CQQ- - ■ ■• / ^' CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY @^ FROM — — , . Date Due ji4»^ttfa>LaiL MMi 1 i^iiCT — "Icf^ — »« P OE^ 1 ^--i-n.iijaiaiMiii.. NOT"^ 'iflir c*^^ 1301 in V ^ 4A^ I U13^J8l18p MmM iifeniin4'^w^' ^ v- r .M wwfCTJ f-ffti.^ \^ \&m^ iiiPi^.- X, PRINTED IN U. 5. A. car NO. 23233 olin 3 1924 028 839 913 Cornell University Library The original of tiiis bool< is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924028839913 ^Ixwcev 4. y>^L-^L^L^ HISTORY OF THE Town of Whatei^y, Mass INCLUDING A NARRATIVE OF LEADING EVENTS FROM THE FIRST PLANTING OF HATFIELD: 1661—1899, AS REVISED AND ENLARGED By JAMES M. CRAFTS, WITH FAMILY GENEALOGIES. PRINTED FOR THE TOWN BY D. L, CBANDALL, MAHN'S BLOCK, ORANGE, MaSS. 1899. Entered according to Act of Oongbbss, in 1899, The History op Whately, Revised and Enlarged By JAMES M. CRAFTS, in the OflBce of the Librarian of Congress. ) . . , I \ » ^Vo'^ PREFACE. When we undertake to gather all of practical interest, as well as what will give us a more realistic view of the noble men and women who were pioneers in the settlement of the north part of Hatfield, now the town of Whately, we can but be im- pressed with the importance of the work we undertake, and. wonder at the paucity of the materials at our disposal. But the many years of labor and painstaking investigation leads us to give to our toWn — the place of our birth — among its people we were reared and spent the greater portion of our life, the results of our labors. We here give the salient portion of Mr. Temple's prefatory remarks, fully endorsing what he has said so well: — "Somewhat isolated in position, and with nothing of nat- ural advantages to attract notice — except the quiet beauty, and rich variety, and broad expanse of landscape, as seen from the central village and the hills lying westerly — Whately has held claim to no special distinction among her neighbors. But the public spirit of her people, and the generous liberality displayed in arranging and carrying out to a successful issue the com- memoration of her centenary, and in providing for the preserva- tion of her annals in the printed volume, are worthy of imitation by the other towns in the Commonwealth. Records are perish- able, and are often incomplete; they are at best but the out- lines; the -filling up must come from personal reminiscences of character and actions, and those incidental items of ci^dl and social affairs, which are transmitted by oral tradition, but with enough of truth to explain the records, and enough of reality to help the practical antiquary in giving a life-like picture of the time of which lie treats. The territory comprising the town was included in, and for one hundred years, was a part of Hatfield. The history of tlie colony, then, properly begins with some account of the mother settlement. Whatever is characteristic of the growth is to be found in the germ. What society was in 177 1 is a result of causes preexisting, and working through the preceding genera- tions ; hence, a sketch of leading events, from the first purchase of these lands by the settlers from Connecticut, seemed neces- sary to a clear understanding of any peculiarities of opinion, and the domestic customs and religious faith of our fathers." A few prefatory remarks, relative to our revision of the History and Genealogy of Whately, will be proper at the outset of the work. In undertaking the revision of our Town History and Genealogical records, I must needs say that I am pro- foundly impressed with the importance of the work that is im- posed upon me. It is with much trepidation that I undertake the work of preparing the labor of years for the press. After the issue of Mr. Temple's work, a widespread feeling of dissat- isfaction was manifested by our townspeople. I need hardly' say that this feeling still exists, and hence, for this, and other reasons, the Town desires me to commence the work at once. In many respects I shall adopt the precise language of Mr. Temple and quote page after page of what he has so well given. Where I differ from him, I trust the people of Whately will give me the credit of a lifelong interest in the Town and its History. For many years I have studied to get at basic facts which underlie our early history. While I freely and gladly indorse much of Mr. Temple's work, and reproduce it in these pages, yet, in very many instances, we can but say that we shall change radically some of his statements, as well as his inferences, drawn from what he has stated as facts. The three years that he spent in the early days of his ministry were insuf- ficient to gather all of the truth pertaining to the multifarious transactions of the people of our town, the location of many of the roads, the names of various localities, the hills, brooks and streams, the places where the settlements were first made, etc., and allow me to say that my eighty-t"v^o years' experience will fail to show that I am as fully posted as I ought to be to set myself up as above mistakes. So I trust my readers will kindly judge of my honesty of purpose in giving what I do. Since the publication of our history by Mr. Temple, I have spent much time in the investigation of our history and its genealogy, and give to the public the results of my labors. For several years that painstaking antiquary, Chester G. Crafts, was intimately associated with me in this work. We carefully surveyed and measured much of the central and eastern portion of the town, and only his untimely sickness and death prevented a continu- ance of our work. As soon as the history was issued I commenced to correct the errors, make additions, and arrange them as they were in- tended, more particularly in the genealogical portion of the work. I had prepared this portion of the work and it was agreed that I should correct the proof sheets. But in this I was disappointed, as not a sheet was sent me. In the historical part I had rendered such assistance as I could, furni.shing many old papers, and yet, very few were satisfied with either part of the work. It is quite possible that our enlarged work may fall short of what may be expected by my townspeople. The great majority of our townspeople are now, as in the past, engaged in rural occupations. While I can say they are a people of whom I feel proud, yet few have risen to celebrity, particularly while remaining in town. Still a few of those who left town have been in Congress, and one in the national cabinet, but they and their parents left our town, removed to the West and grew up under a different regime, and freed from any old stigmas resting on the family. It is right for me to say of some families that left town, and New England as well, that the place of their res- idence is unknown. I shall avail myself of every avenue where information can be obtained. I freely acknowledge my indebt- edness to Sheldon's History of Deerfield, Judd's History of Hadley, The Crafts Families, the B^dwell Families and San- dersons, both gathered by me, as well as the Graves' records, in which I assisted in collecting. I shall also reproduce a large portion of Mr. Temple's work verbatim. Where I disagree with him I shall manfully say so, and give my version of the matter. In the Ecclesiastical portion I shall leave out many things like the confession of faith, the covenant and some other things. All proper and right for a history of the church, but seemingly out of place in a town history. I confess to a feeling of pride in the old Congrega- tional church, its establishment in Whately and its influence for good among our people. But this does not afford any reason for inserting it entire in our town history. JAMES M. CRAFTS. Orange, Mass., 1899. HISTORY OF WHATELY. CHAPTER I. INDIAN OWNERSHIP PURCHASE BY PYNCHON AND THE HAD- LEY COMPANY. At the time of the proposed settlement of the part of the valley of the Connecticut River lying between the Mt. Holyoke range on the south, and Sugar Loaf and Toby on the north, this Tract was in the occupancy of the Norwottuck Indians, who were a branch of the Nipnett or Nipmuck tribe, whose chief seat was in the central part of the state. The Norwottucks of the valley were divided into three prin- cipal families, under three petty chiefs, viz. : Chickwallop, Umpanchala and Quonquont. Each claimed ownership of the lands lying for a distance on both sides of the river, and extend- ing indefinitely east and west. Chickwallop held the lands pur- chased by the Northampton planters and eastward. Umpan- chala claimed on the Hadley side as far north as Mill River, and on the Hatfield side from Northampton bounds to the upper side of Great Meadow. Quonquont occupied from Umpanchala's line to Mt. Wequomps, or Sugar Loaf, and Mt. Toby. North of these was the territory of the Pocumtucks, or Deerfield Indi- ans. Collectively, these were called the River Indians. Each of these Indian families had its fort, its planting field and its hunting grounds. The fort was located, for obvious reasons, on a bluff, in some commanding position, and near a stream or spring of water. It was constructed of palisades, or poles about lo feet long set in the ground. Its size depended on the lay of the land and the necessities of each tribe, as their wigwams were placed within the enclosure. The cornfield was always close to the fort. Quonquont, who claimed the lands now comprisng Whately and eastward, had a strong fort on the east side of the Connecti- cut, north of Mill River in Hadley. It, was built on a ridge that separates the east and west School Meadows, and enclosed about an acre of ground. His cornfield, of sixteen to twenty acres, was in the upper meadow. This fort was abandonedvsome time before the attack on Quaboag. The principal fort of Umpanchala was on the high bank of the Connecticut near the mouth of Half-way Brook, between Northampton and Hatfield. This fort was occupied by the tribe till the night of August 24, 1675, and was the last fortified dwell- ing place held by the Indians in this part of the valley. The planting field of this family was the "Chickens," or Indian Hollow, in Hatfield South Meadow. The Indian's home in this valley was then, what it still remains, a scene of abundance and beauty. The mountains reared their bold heads towards the sky for grandeur and de- fence ; the hills, clothed in their primeval forests of variegated hues, arrested the showers, and poured down their tributes in little rivulets, v/hose path was marked by green verdure and brilliant flowers ; the annual overflow of the great river made the valley fat and fertile. Yet these natural advantages appear to have been of small account with the natives. So far as we can judge, convenience and necessity alone influenced them in the selection. The furs and flesh of animals, and the fish of the streams, met most of their ordinary wants ; grass was of no ac- count ; and even the corn which their women raised was a kind of surplus for emergencies, to be relied on in the scarcity of game and the event of war. * The Indian was a savage, with the instincts and ideas of a savage ; and he estimated things accordingly. Personal ease and sensual gratification was his highest happiness ; the pursuit of game was his excitement; war was his highest ambition and fielii of glory ; and outside of these he had nothing to love, and *Josselyn, Voyages, says: "They [the Indians] beat the Corn to powder and put it into bags, which they make use of when stormie weather or the like will not sutfer them to lookout for other food." nothing to live for. All these local advantages he had here ; and war with some rival tribe was always at his option. The red man had long been the occupant of the territory. And he seems to have understood perfectly the validity of his title to these lainds by right of possession. Why then — the que.stion will naturally arise^-was the Indian so ready to part with his title, and transfer his right to the new comers ? The general answer is, because he was a man and a savage. There is a strange fascination accompaning a higher order of intelli- gence, and the power inherent to enlightened intellect, which is irresistible to the untutored child of nature. He looks up with awe, and instinctly yearns for companionship with that higher life. To his apprehension it is allied with the supernatural ; and partakes of the potent, if not the omnipotent. And; aside from any veneration, he sees the advantage every way of civili- zation ; and the manhood in him rises up in hope and expecta- tion. His ideas may be vague as to results to accrue, but he anticipates some great advantage; he expects to become a par- taker of that which draws and inspires. It is only when, by actual contact and contrast, he discovers and comes to feel his inferiority, and his moral weakness, as compared with civilized man, that he becomes jealous of him ; and the jealousy ripens into hatred ; and the hatred ripens into hostility. No doubt acts of injustice and wrong aggravate the jealousy, and hasten the conflict. But civilized and savage life can never coalesce. There is inherent antagonism which necessitates a conflict. And in the struggle the weaker must yield to the stronger. And strength lies not in numbers, but in resources ; the courage which conquers is moral rather than physical. Thus the two orders of society cannot exist together ; one must yield and flee, or become subordinate and be absorbed in the other. In selling their lands to the settlers, the Indians in this val- ley expected to be, and believed that they were the true gaineVs by the bargain. They reserved all the rights and privileges that were of any real value to them ; and calculated on receiv- ing advantages from the skill and traffic of the whites, as well as those indefinite, perhaps imaginary advantages, to which I have alluded. One reason why the River Indians were anxious to sell, at the particular time when the whites came to the valley, was their fear of the Mohawks from the Hudson, who were threatening a war of extermination — just as, sixteen years later, the Pocumtucks and Norwottucks planned a war of extermina- 8 tion against the whites, whom they now so cordially welcomed. The Hadley Planters. The company that formed the original Hadley plantation, covering lands on both sides of the river, was from Connecticut. Their first step was to obtain leave from the General Court to settle within the jurisdiction of Massachusetts ; and the second step was to purchase the lands of the Indians. The negotiation was carried on through the agency of Maj. John Pynchon of Springfield, to whom the deeds were made out, and who assigned his rights to the Company, and received his pay of individuals as they took possession of their assigned lots. Maj. Pynchon paid the Indians in wampum and goods ; and received payment in grain, with perhaps a con- siderable quantity of wampum, and a small amount of silver. Wampum, which was in the shape of beads, was made of seashells. It was manufactured mainly by the Indians of Long Island, and, later, by those of Block Island. It was of two kinds, white, or wampumpeag ; and black or blue, called suck- auhock, which was of double the value of white. In 1650 the Massachusetts government ordered that wampumpeag should be a legal tender for debts (except for country rates) to the value of forty shillings, the white at eight and the black at four for a penny. This law was repealed in 1661, after which wampum had no standard value — the price being regulated by demand and supply. A hand of wampum was equal to four inches. In the Hatfield purchase it was reckoned seven inches. A fathom was ten hands and was ordinarily worth five shillings. It was much used for ornaments, such as belts, bracelets, head-bands, ear-pendants, and by the squaws of chiefs for aprons. Its use in trade was continued for many years by the whites. The first purchase on account of the Hadley settlers was made December 25, 1658, and embraced the lands on the east side of the Connecticut, from the mouth of Fort River and Mt. Holyoke, on the south, to the mouth of Mohawk brook and the southern part of Mt. Toby, on the north, being about nine miles in length, and extending eastwardly nine miles into the woods. The price paid was two hundred and twenty fathoms of wam- pum and one large coat, equal to ;r^62 10. The deed was signed by Ilmpanchala, Quonquont and Chickwallop. Quonquont reserved one cornfield of twelve — sixteen — twenty acres, near his fort ; and all reserved the liberty to hunt deer or fowl, and to take fish, beaver and otter. The second purchase was made July 10, 1660, and com- prised the lands on the west or Hatfield side, from Capawong brook (now Mill river) on the south, to the brook called Wunck- compss, which comes out of the Great Pond, and over the brook to the upper side of the meadow called Mincommuck, on the north, and extending westerly nine miles into the woods. (The north line was probably where is now the meadow road running east and west, just north of the dwelling house of Austin S. Jones, Esq.) The price paid was three hundred fathoms of wampum and some small gifts, equal to ;^75. The deed is .signed by Umpanchala and approved by his brother, Etowotnq. The reservations were the Chickons, or planting field, and the liberty to hunt deer and other wild creatures, to take fish and to set wigwams on the Commons, and take wood and trees for use. The third purchase was the meadow called Capawonk, lying in the south part of Hatfield. The deed is dated January 22, 1663. This meadow had been bought of the Indians in 1657, for fifty shillings, by the Northampton Planters. The price paid by Hadley was ^30. The.se three purchases comprise all the territory noith of Fort River and Northampton, actually possessed by Hadley. No bounds were established for the town by any act of incorpo- ration ; and the'only claim it had to what is now the northerly part of Hatfield and Whately, was a .report of commissioners appointed by the General Court to lay out the new plantation, in which their north bounds on this side of the river are stated "To be a great mountain called Wequomps," — which report of Commissioners seems never to have been accepted. And the last two purchases, viz.: From Northampton bounds on the south, to a line just north of Great Meadow, comprise all the territory west of the river owned by Hatfield at the time the latter town was incorporated. The tract of land lying northerly from Great Meadow (now North Hatfield and Whately) was purchased of the Indians by Hatfield, October 19, 1672. This was Quonquont's land, and the deed was signed by his widow Sarah Quanquan, his son Pocunohouse, his daughter Majesset and two others. The price paid was fifty fathoms of wampum- peag. The south line was from a walnut tree standing by the river in Mincommuck meadow, westerly but into the woods. It was bounded on the north by Weekioannuck brook, where the Pocumtuck path crosses it — the line running east to the great river, and west six miles into the woods. The reservations in these deeds were somewhat varied ■> lO but it was understood by both parties — indeed it was a tradition current in my own boyhood — that the Indians had the right of hunting, fowling and fishing anywhere, and to take what wal- nut and white ash trees they had occasion to use for baskets and brooms." We add here a few words about Weekioannuck brook, I have ascertained by measurements as follows, viz.; going east from Deerfield road on the line of the uppermost lot (No. 70) 2d division of commons, starting from a stone boundary standing on the east bank of an old ditch. This south from the corner stone in the South Deerfield cemetery 41 chains, 37 links, or 165 rods and 12 links to said stone. Thence east, 26 chains and 20 links to ditch top of Hopewell hill, then 37 chains, 97 links to an oak tree on the west bank of the brook, Weekioannuck, 39 chains, 72 links to an oak tree on the east bank of the said brook, 154 rods, 22 links to the east oak tree. The brook run- ning in almost the line of the town line. From this last oak tree it is 112 rods to the bound stone north of the Capt. Parker place, or 124 rods to the centre of the Sunderland road. This is from a careful survey made by C. G, and J. M. Crafts in 1883. CHAPTER I I. SETTLEMENTS — DIVISION OF I^ANDS — INCORPORATION OF HATFIELD. The first planters of Mew England were wholly unaccus- tomed to the work of clearing ofiF woodlands. They had seen and heard nothing of it in the mother country. Hence the ear- liest settlements were uniformly made at places where they could begin immediately to cultivate the ground and find natural pastures and meadows. It was considered scarcely desirable or safe to form a Plan- tation where there was not plenty of "fresh marsh" — what we should call open swamp. And so when the west side people petitioned for a new town, the Hadley Committee, in their an- swer to the General Court, gave as one of the strongest reasons against the separation, that the tract west of the river "does not afibrd boggy meadows or such like that men can live upon ; but their subsistence must be from their Home lots and inter- vals." Both the east and west side settlers found the meadows and adjacent uplands ready for grazing and tillage. There was needed no preliminary work of clearing off the forests. They began to plant corn and sow wheat and flax and mow grass the first season. From early times the Indians had been accustomed to burn over the whole country annually in November, after the leaves had fallen and the grass, had become dry, which kept the meadows clean, and prevented any growth of underbrush on the uplands. One by one the older trees would give way, and thus 12 nianj' cleared fields, or tracts with only here and there a tree, would abound, where the sod would be friable, ready for the plow ; or be already well covered with grass ready for pastur- age. The meadow lands thus burnt over, threw out an early 3nd rich growth of nutritious grasses, which if let alone grew "Up to a man's face." Then there were plots of ground, of greater or less extent, which the Indian squaws had cultivated in their rude way with shell or wooden hoes, and where they had raised squashes and beans and corn. . Strange as it may seem, both timber and fire wood were scarce in the valley when the first settlement was made. At the outset Hatfield passed a vote that no clapboards, shingles or rails, or coopering stuff should be sold "to go out of town." The upland woods, on each side of the river, both above and below the towns, were passable for men on horseback. As already stated, the Hadley planters were from Wethers- field and Hartford, in the Connecticut Colony. They had mostly come over from England in the years 1632 to '34, and landed at the mouth of the Charles river in Massachusetts. A part lived at Watertown till 1635, when they removed to Weth- ersfield. Mr. Hooker, who came over with his flock in 1633, stopped in Cambridge till '36, when they removed to Hartford. Thus they had resided in Connecticut about twenty-five years. The reason for leaving Wethersfield and Hartford, and seeking a new residence in Hadley and Hatfield, was on account of a schism in church government. It was strongly held that infants dying in an unbaptized state were lost forever. This really abominable tenet in the church was strongly opposed by the more liberal element in the church and at length proved suc- cessful, and "persons not of scandalous character," who would consent solemnly to the covenant, really joined the church "half-way." This would allow them to have their children baptized and if the sacrement of baptism was administered it was held that in the event of the child dying before coming to the age of moral accountability, it would be saved. The di- vergence of opinions relative to this matter caused the removal to Hadley and Hatfield. Those who came were the bitter opponents of more liberal practices, edged about by a conscientious desire to worship as they deemed only right and proper. On these questions very warm, if not to say, hot discussions were held not only at Hartford and Wethersfield, but all over New England. It was ♦ . 13' upon this division of sentiment and. other really unimportant matters that they .determined to leave their. pleasant homes and remove to Massachusetts. It is quite probablp that they well understood the condition of Hatfield, even when they formed the agreement to remove in 1659, and probably knew the pre- cise, lot assigned to them. It is generally agxeed, that but one of' the settlers of. Hatfield was actually on the ground, until about the first of October, 1661. Richaxd Fellows came in the spring.. He in 1659 removed to. Springfield and thence to Northampton and in 1661 to Hatfield, where he died in 1663.,, Zecliariah Field came to Northampton in 1659, and as early as 1663 re- moved to Hatfield. But the majority of the first settlers came about the .first of October, 166 1. It is claimed .that ten days w.ere taken for the journey of some less than ,50 miles, . as brooks, creeks and pther streams had to be bridged or fording places found, swamps and mo; rasses, corduroyed to afford safe pas^sage for their carts, heavily loaded with their women and small children and their personal effe.cts. Of course this required an efficient force of pioiieers. They brought with them their stock of various kinds. One could now much easier move to California,- and accomplish it quicker. Availing myself of the assistance of that exceedingly well- posted antiquary, D. W. Wells, Esq., of Hatfield, and long time President of the Smith Charities, enables me to fill up the list of the noble band of Hatfield's first settlers. Richard Fel- lows, in the spring of 1661. Then came later John Coleman, Thomas Graves, Isaac Graves, John Graves, Samuel Belden, Stephen Taylor, Daniel Warner, Daniel White, John White, Jr., John Cowles, or Cole, Ozias Goodwin, Richard Billings, Nathaniel Dickinson, Jr., Samuel Dickinson, Obadiah Dickin- son, William Gull, Eleazer Frary, Samuel Kellogg, John Wells, Philip Russell and , probably John Hawks, Samuel Gillett. Thomas Bull gave up his claim. And it is claimed that Wm. A His and Thomas Meekins came in 1 661, possibly with the others by way of the cart path through Westfield. . Judd's History of Hadle'y sfiys that Hadley in 166 1 allotted 176 acres to the Hatfield settlers, giving most of the settlers eight acres each where they had families; to some young men. four acres each. Thomas Graves, then a very old man, was not given any, as he Uved with his son Isaac. A homestead of eight acres was assigned to Thomas Bull, but for some reason he gave it up aiid went back to Hartford. Thefe Were six tliat only had four acres each, making 24 acres; and nineteen that had eight acres each, making 152 acres, which with 24 added makes the whole 1 76 acres granted by Hadley. It is quite in the line of probability that each settler knew just where his lot was before he came as Samuel Partridge said, "A meeting was held on the west side of the Connecticut River in 1660." And this was doubtless that of a committee sent up to lay out the several lots on each side of the wide street. The location of these lots is fairly well known to the present gener- ation of Hatfield people. Perhaps I may be justified in giving a few words relevant to some of the lots now occupied by public buildings. The meeting house, Town hall and Congregational parsonage are all on the lot assigned to Lieut. William AUis. The Memorial hall is on the lot assigned to Thomas Meekins. The Smith academy on the lot assigned to Samuel Kellogg, all nice struc- tures. The Main street was surrounded by a continuous line of palisades. These extended from the highway to Northampton, north about one hundred and two rods and about 12 rods west and so east of the street. This really enclosed all of the orig- , inal settlers' houses, with good and substantial gates. Settlers who came later were outside of the palisades, and it was that part that was raided by the Indians September 19, 1677, when 12 were killed and 17 captives carried to Canada. The first comers were men of wealth and good social posi- tion, and were regarded by the Massachusetts authorities as a most desirable addition to her population. They had, as their subsequent history proved, the self reliance and earnestness and courage which usually attach to men who strike out a new path for conscience's sake. The agreement to remove to the new purchase was signed April 18, 1659, and some went up that summer to make prepa- ration for a general transfer. Perhaps a few families spent the winter of '59-60 at the new plantation, which at first was called New Town. It received the name of Hadleigh in 1661. Division of Lands. By agreement, made before leaving Connecticut, each original proprietor received an equal share, viz., eight acres of land as a home lot. The street on the Had- ley side was laid out twenty rods wide and the lots extended back from it on each side. The street on the Hatfield side was ten rods wide, and the first home lots at the lower end con- 15 tained eight acres. Those granted afterwards, further north, contained only four acres. Ownership of land in fee simple, by every inhabitant, was a characteristic American idea and was a corner stone of the social fabric built by our fathers. It was personal independence, it was capital, it was power, it was permanence and it was substan- tial equality. The first planters here recognized the principle that every honest citizen, whatever the amount of his cash assets, had a right to so much land as secured him an indepen- dent home, a real property, which could not be alienated except by his own option ; which assured him the means of rearing and educating a family. He was a free man indeed. He had some- thing to build upon, something to fix his affections upon, some- thing to defend, something to leave his children, which they after him could love and build upon and defend. Love of home and love of country are co-ordinate and reciprocal and have their most vital root in ownership of the soil, with the power and privilege it engenders. Our ancestors in this valley could never have stood against the tides of savage warfare, which in rapid succession burst over them, had it not been that they defended their own and their children's iiome and heritage. As we have seen, the first division of home lots was equal. But, after this first equal division, all subsequent allotments of meadows and intervals were made according to estates. Yet here only a nominal inequality was allowed, a single man of twenty-one receiving one-fourth as much as the man of large wealth >and family. The term estates, as used at that time, requires an explana- tion. It did not represent a man's actual property, real or per sonal. Precisely how the thing was brought about we are not informed. But by mutual agreement, evidently satisfactory to all parties, a sum varying from ;^50 for a young unmarried man, to ;^20o for a man of independent means, was set against each proprietor's name and called his estate, and used as a ba- sis of land distribution and taxation. The wealthy planters con- sented to receive less than their jproper share of lands and were held to pay less than their ratable proportion of expenses ; while th^ young man, for the sake of receiving a larger allotment of land, agreed to pay a proportionate part of the plantation taxes. And the principle of substantial equality was further recog- -nized by the peculiar method adopted in distributing the com- i6 mon fields,- where no one received his full share in one lot, in which case he would run the chance to get all good or all poor land, but each meadow was first partitioned off into two or more parts, and each proprietor had a share in the subdivision of the several parts. Thus the North or Great Meadow was first ap- portioned into six parts, and each west side settler hdd a lot in each of the six divisions. Little Meadow was apportioned into two parts and South Meadow ihto three parts, each proprietor receiving a lot in each part. A ;^5o estate drew of mead- ow land thirteen and One-half acres in all ; a ^200 estate drew fifty-four and one-half acres. At the same time the vast extent of upland. was open to all equally for wood, timber .'and pasturage. And now they began to build upon these foundations. As there were no sawmills driven by water, the frame and covering of their houses must be got out by hand. Boards as well as joists were sawed in saw pits, as they were called, i. e., two men, one above on a scaffolding, and one below in the pit, work- ing the saw, but most of the covering stuff for buildings was split or cleft. These cloven boards, or clapboards, were com- monly from four to six feet long, five inches wide and six-eighths of an inch thick on the back. Shingles were all tli^' way from fourteen inches to three feet long, and one inch thick at the thick end. At first all stuff was split from oak. Fences, next in order after roads and houses, were built. .The home lots, which were fenced by the owners, usually with posts and rails, required above twenty miles of fencing. The common fields, except Great Meadow, which' was surrounded by ponds and brooks, were usually enclosed with a broad ditch, on the bank of which were set two poles or three rails, making the whole over four feet in height. The ditch was on the out- side, as the main object was to keep out roving animals. The by-laws regarding fences were minute and strict. Common fences were required to be made good by March 20th of each year, and to be so close as to keep out swine three months old. Each proprietor of a common field was required to fence accord- ing to the number of acres he held in the field, and '"To have a stake twelve inches high at the end of his fence, with the two first letters of his name facing the way the fence runs." The location of a man's fence, like that of his land, was determined by lot. 17 Gates were placed wherever a road crossed a common field. If a person, owner or traveler, left open the gates or bars of a meadow after March 20, he had to pay 2s. 6d.; at a later date the fine was 5 shillings besides all damages. Gates were in existence on the River road and in other parts of the town after the Revolution. All males over sixteen years were required to work one day yearly on the highway and owners of meadow land at the rate of one day for every twenty acres. All over fourteen years were required to work one day in June cutting brush or clearing the commons. ■ At first the tillage lands were devoted mainly to corn, wheat, peas and flax, as these were the essential articles of food and the means of payment of debts and taxes, and an important item of each season's work was the gathering of fire wood and candle wood. The latter was the pitch, or hard pine, and was the only substitute for candles for a. number of years. The first gristmill was built in r662 by Thomas Meekins, on Hatfield Mill River. (The stream in a town on which a mill was first erected was usually called Mill River.) He re- ceived a grant of twenty acres near the mill for building it, and the town agreed to have all the grain ground at his mill "Pro- vided he make good meal." Formation of a Church and Incorporation of the Town. The west side proprietors grew and multiplied so that at the end of 'seven years they numbered forty-seven families. The river was a serious obstacle to the enjoyment of religious ordinances, and as early as 1667 a petition for a separate society was sent to the General Court. The next year the Court granted them leave to settle and maintain a minister, but Hadley objected, and an earnest controversy ensued, the result of which was that the west side was incorporated into a town by the name of Hatfields, May 31, 1670. At the time the Cpurt granted leave foi separate church privileges they determined to have their own preaching whether Hadley consented or not, and at a "side meeting," as it was called, held Nov. 6, 1668, a committee was chosen "To provide a boarding place for a minister and arrange for his maintenance, also to build a meeting-house thirty feet square." No plantation was considered fit for municipal ■privileges till a meeting-house and minister were provided for, and it is likely that their determined action in this matter in- i8 duced the Court to set them off into a town, even before they expected, or were quite ready for it. In addition to preparation for the ordinances it was vot^d, at a side meeting, February, 1670, to lay out a piece of ground twenty rods long by eight rods wide, upon the plain near Thomas Meekin's land, for a burying place. They had also virtually "called" their minister and fixed his salary before incorporation , In the November following Mr. Hope Atherton, the pastor elect, signified his acceptance of the call, and the town voted him, in addition to the home lot of eight acres, the ministerial allotment in the meadows "To build him a house, forty by twenty feet, double story," and allow him ;^6o a year, two- thirds in wheat and one-third in pork, with the proviso. "If our crops fall so short that we cannot pay him in kind, then we are to pay him in the next best way we have," and the further proviso, that if Mr. Atherton left them before his death certain sums were to be refunded the town. The precise date of the formation of the. church is unknown, but there is pretty clear evidence, however, that it took place near the first of April, 167 1. It appears that only six of the male inhabitants were church members. These were Thomas Meekins, Sr., William AUis, John Cole, Sr., Isaac Graves, Samuel Belden and either Rich- ard Billings or William Gull. At a meeting in February, 1671, the town voted that these resident members should "Be those to begin in gathering the church, and that they should have power to choose three persons to make up nine to join in the work." The exact import of this last clause is not apparent. "As seven is the least number by which the rule of church dis- cipline in the eighteenth chapter of Matthew can be reduced to practice, that number has been held necessary to form a church state. [Ency. Rel. Knowl.] And we find that at Northamp- ton, in 1 66 1, seven men, called the "seven pillars," were organ- ized as a church. Also at Westfield, in 1679, seven men, called "foundation men," were selected to be formed into church state. Thus all the essentials of social life — homes, fenced fields, roads, a grist mill, a burying place, a meeting house and min- ister — were secured. Schools, as we now use the term, were not regarded a neces-sity in the first years of a settlement. In- deed, the public or free school system was not a germ, but a growth of our institutions. To give all access to the Holy Scriptures family instruction in spelling and reading was con- sidered obligatory and was common from the first. To secure this a law was passed in 1642 requiring the selectmen of towns to look after the children of parents and masters who neglected to bring them up in "learning and labor." In 1647 it was en- acted that every town with fifty families should provide a school where children might be taught to read and write. Practically this secured an education to only those who were able to pay for it and it was commonly understood to apply only to boys. The first books used were the "Horn Book," Primer, Psal- ter and Testament. The Horn Book was the alphabet and a few rudiments printed on one side of a card and pasted upon a board, and this was covered with translucent horn to prevent its being soiled. They were in use till about 1700 when Dilworth's spelling book was introduced. Hatfield had a school regularly established in 1678, two- thirds of the expense being borne by the scholars and one-third by the town. The first schoolhouse was built in 1681 and Dr. Thomas Hastings was the- first teacher. It was not uncommon to unite the profession of physician and teacher in the same per- son, and as the grandmothers were mainly relied on for prescrip- tions and poultices he seems to have found sufficient time for the discharge of duty in the double capacity. The school year was divided into two terms, beginning respectively about April I and October i. A Separate rate was made for each term, the parent paying for only the .time his child attended. From a record of attendance for 1698-9 it appears that thirty-seven boys were pupils in the winter and thirty-eight in the summer, of whom only four were writers. The salary of the teacher was .^30 to ;^35 per year, payable in grain. This school became free in 1722. Though the statutes relating to schools use the word .child- ren, yet it was understood to apply primarily to boys. Girls were taught to read at home or by "dames" who gathered a class at their private dwellings, but the education of girls seems to have been regarded as unnecessary for the first hundred years of the New England colonies. "" Even so late as the Amer- ican Revolution comparatively few women could write their names. In the grammar schools of most of the older towns no girls were found. Boston did not allow them to attend the pub- lic schools till 1790. Northampton admitted them for the first time in 1802. There is evidence that girls attended the school in Hatfield when it was first opened and for several years thereafter and 20 pursued the same studies as tlie boys. From 1695 to 1699 none are found upon the list. In 1700, during the winter term, four girls and forty-two boys were in attendance. In 1709 there were sixteen girls in a class of sixty-four, which shows a rapid change in public sentiment. Probably the mothers, educated in their girlhood by Dr. Hast- ings, discovered the advantage of an education, (possibly their husbands found out the same fact), and when their daughters arrived at a suitable age they sent them to school, and thus the custom originated and rapidly gained force which resulted in the free school of 1722. With this fact in mind, there is seen to be a striking fitness that a Hatfield woman, Miss Sophia Smith, should be the first to found a female college in Massachusetts. Whately wisely adopted her mother's views, as no one remembers the time when girls did not commonly attend school and pursue the same stud- ies as boys. These early settlers lived mostly within themselves, depend- ing on the produce of their lands and cattle, though some, in addition to farming, did carpenter's or blacksmith's work and coopering. The women helped their husbands, reared children, bolted the flour and spun flax and wool and wove them into cloth. Most families had a few cows a.nd sheep, and many swine. Oxen were used for farm work and to haul grain and flour to market and horses were kept solely for the saddle. Money was scarcely a circulating medium and trade was mostly "in kind" or wampum. Zechariah Field was the first who carried on trade in Hat-, field, but his business was limited and proved unprofitable. Families bought most of their goods of John Pynchon of Spring- field, and paid in wheat, flour, pork and malt. Taxes were paid in grain, and even the sacramental charges of the church were paid in wheat, for which purpose three half-pecks per member per year appears to have been the usual requirement. The only communication with the outside world was with Northampton and Springfield and their old homes in Connecti- cut. There was a cartway to Windsor and Hartford by way of Westfield, and there was a road to Springfield on the east side of the river. The Bay Road, through Quaboag, (Brookfield) was only a horse path till after 1 700. CHAPTER III. THE FIRST INDIAN WAR, 1675 — 1678. Thus .in their quiet seclusion and healthful pursuits, and th«cenjoyment of social! and Christian intercourse, they passed fifteen years. Some who came to the valley with gray hairs had laid them down to rest in the' old grave-yard. The infant had become a youth and the youth had reached manhood. With some homesickness and reverses the sun of prosperity beamed kindly and brightly, and a future full of promise and hope for their children seemed opening upon them. But on a sudden this quiet life was broken up. War in its most frightful form, war, such as the merciless and treacherous savage knows how to wage, burst upon them! Upito this time the whites and red men had lived together on terms of • friendship. There was no social equality and no mingling of races. Each led his own distinctive Ufe and, thoiigh the separation between the two forms became daily more apparent, no conflict occurred, and suspicion, if it existed, was studiously concealed. The English had plowed for the Indians the reserved planting field or, as they sometimes preferred, had rented -their own plowed fields, the squaws planting and tending them -' 'at halves ;" the Indians had dwelt in their Fort or pitched their wigwams on the Commons and sometimes on the home lots and'-gone in and out at pleasure. The only danger apprehended seems to have been from the thieving and begging propensities of the savages and their anger when under the influence of al«€)holic drink. The people erected no fortifications, and the militia men were rather for ornament than use. .Hatfield had only six troopers in 1674. a tt had been the custom for the Indians to apply ^or ground to plant upon and make arrangements for the same, very early in the season, usually in February, but this spring (1675) they were silent on the subject and made no preparation for putting in a crop. They also removed their wigwams, and whatever goods they claimed, from the home lots and adjacent meadows to the fort. And early in summer a favorite squaw counseled goodwife Wright of Northampton "To get into town with her children." These things were known, but attracted little attention. They may have awakened suspicion, but it could hardly be called alarm as it led to no special preparations for defence. In about three weeks after the Brookfield fight, the scat- tered bands of Indians gathered on the Connecticut river. They concentrated at the Fort between Northampton and Hatfield. Capt. Lathrop and Capt. Beers, with their companies, composed mostly of men from the eastern part of the state, having scoured the region of the river, came to Hadley, probably on the 23d of August. As a precautionary measure, rather than from a belief in their hostile intentions, it was judged best to disarm the Indians then in the Fort. And on the next day a parley was held and a formal demand for the surrender of their arms was made. The Indians objected and demanded time for considera- tion. And it was finally agreed that if a deputation should be sent over the next morning, a final answer would then be given. Distrusting their sincerity, the officers determined to surround^ the Fort and secure their arms by force, if need be. To effect this with certainty, about midnight word was sent to the com- manding officer at Northampton to bring up his company to the south of the Fort, "As near as they could without being per- ceived," while the others would post themselves on the north. The two companies then crossed to the .Hatfield side and moved quietly down, reaching the Fort a little before break of day. But the movement was too late to effect its object. The wily savage had' fled, taking arms, goods and all, having first killed an old sachem who opposed their plans. After a brief council of war, the captains resolved to follow and with one hundred men pursued "At a great pace," up the Deerfield path. The Indians had evidently anticipated such a movement and were lying in ambush in a swamp near the road. From the facts that have come to light, it seems probable that the English captains expected to hold a parley rather than to 23 fight, and were marching without special precaution. But on a sudden, as the troops were crossing the head of a ravine, the Indians "Let fly about forty guns at them." Our men quickly returned the fire ; some of them rushed down into the swamp, forcing the enemy to throw away much of their baggage, and after awhile each man, after the Indian manner, got behind his tree and watched his, opportunity to get a shot at them. The fight continued about three hours, when the Indians withdrew. ''We lost six men upon the ground, a seventh died of his wounds coming home and two died the next night, -making nine in all."* Only one of the killed, Richard Fellows, belonged to Hatfield. Owing to an apparent contradiction in the two accounts of this fight extant, Mr. Russell of Hadley placing it at "A swamp beyond Hatfield" and Hubbard saying it occurred "Ten miles above Hatfield, at a place called Sugar Loaf Hill," the location has not been hitherto identified. But there is really no contradiction. Both accounts are agreed that it was a swamp above Hatfield, at a place called Sugar Loaf Hill. It is also clear that our men were pursuing the usual Indian trail between Hatfield and Deerfield. If, then, a spot can be found where the trail skirts the edge of the swamp near the foot of Sugar Loaf, the presumption would be that the ambush was concealed at that point. And if this point furnished a background fitted for a cover, and at the same time afforded good chance of retreating in case of defeat, the presumption would amount to almost certainty. The chief ground of doubt remaining is the "ten miles from Hatfield," stated by Hubbard. But Mr. Hubbard received his information at second hand, while Mr. Russell, who lived at Hadley and gathered his account at the time from the soldiers themselves, names no distance. And this apparent difficulty vanishes when the common estimate (for no measurement had then been made) of distances on this path is considered. As appears from papers relating to the "Dedham Grant" the distance from Hadley to Deerfield was reckoned "twelve miles." Taking this estimated distance as a basis for getting a ratio of the true distance, the "ten miles" would be to the southward of Sugar Loaf. The only remaining difiiculty is as to the exact line of march. By reference to the Indian deed and the act defining the north line of Hatfield, it is plain that the Deerfield path crossfed Sugar Loaf Brook where said •Stoddard's Letter. 24- brook intersects the DeerfieM and Hatfield; (afterwainds. Whatdyr)! line. Starting from "Poplar Spring," a well-known locality on. this path, and following the line of trail towards the point indi- cated, at a point about a fourth of a mile south of Sugar Loaf Brook the traveler comes upon a ravine which exactly meets; all' the published conditions of the fight. The swamp here trends- into the plain, making a triangular depression, wherens- a spring of water that finds its way into Hopewell. Brook. An ambush of forty Indians(the number named by Stoddard) could be hid- den among thte "beaver holes," prostrate stumps and huge hem-' locks, and as their pursuers crossed the head of the ravine tHeir line would be exposed for nearly its whole length, as the Indians could fire up both slopes of the bluff. The peculiar lay of the land also accounts for the fact that "One* of ours was shot iffi the back by our own men," which might readily ha-ppen. if he- pushed down into, the swamp while a part of the' force remained on the oppo.site of the triangle. There is no doubt that the destruction of Quaboag and the successful stratagem by which they escapedfrom the fort at Hat- field and the indecisive struggle at "The Swamp," last de- scribed, greatly encouraged the Indians. The advantage gained was on their side. The loss of the Indians in the Swamp figrht was put by our men at twenty-six, but this is conjecture' and the numbei is improbable. The scattered and isolated si^uatio^of the towns and their almost defenceless condition was in the savages' favor. Our officers and soldiers were not familiar with their modes of warfare and were not uniteld in opinion as to the best method of attack and defence. The settlers were not lacking in courage, but in skill and unity. ' From the date last given, August 25, there were constant alarms, individual surprises and scouting, till the disastrous fight at Northfield and desertion of 'the place, September 2 and 4, and the still more disastrous slaughter of "The flower of Es- sex" at Muddy Brook, September 18. Deerfield was immedi- ately abandoned and her settlers retired to Hatfield and Had ley. The whole valley was a scene of apprehension and moufhing. Fathers went out to cut fire wood or gather corn in the morning and' returned not ; the light of blazing barns at night sent fear tcf'the hearts of the boldest ; the crack of the Indian's gun in the thicket was at once the traveler's warningand death knell. -'Thus passed the month after the battle of Muddy Brook, afterwards appropriately called Bloody Brook. The savages were always- on the alert and usually appeared just when and where they were least expected. Springfield was burned Octo- ber 5, the very day on which an attack on Hadley from the north' waS' expected; An extract from a letter written by Maj. John Pynchon, dated Hadley, September 30, will give a vivid> picture of the situation: "We are endeavoring to discover the enemy and daily send out scouts, but little is effected. Our English are somewhat awk and fearful in scouting and spying, though- we do the best we can. We have no Indian friends here to-help us. We find the Indians have their scouts out. Two days ago two Englishmen at Northampton, being gone out in the morning to cut wood, and. but a little from the house, were both shot down dead, having two bullets apiece shot into each of their breasts. The Indians cut off their scalps, took their arms and were off ia a trice." And in a postcript to another letter," dated October 8, he says: "To speak my thoughts', ail these towns ought to be garrisoned as L have for- merly hinted. To go out after the Indians in the swamps and thickets is to hazard all our men, unless we know where they keep, which is altogether unknown to us." This will explain the defensive policy adopted by the English. On Tuesday, the rgth of October, early in the morning, the Indiaflskindled great fireS' iu the woods to the northward of Hatfield, probably in the neighborhood of "Mother George," to attract the village people,, and! then concealed themselves'in the hushes to await the result. About noon, ten horsemen were sent out to scout, and as they were passing the ambush the Indians fired, killing six and taking three prisoners, one of whom, they afterwards tortured to death. They then fell with all their fury upon the village, evidently hoping to wipe it out as they hadt done to Northfield and Deerfield. But, as the chronicle has it, "According to the good providence of God," Capt. Mosely and Capt. Poole,, who with their companies then garrisoned Hatfield, successfully repelled the assault. After a fierce and protracted struggle the ^Indians fled, having mortally wounded one soldier and burned -Liew buildings. This was the first decided defeat they had suffered , if we except the repulse at Hadley (of which so little is known) through the skiU and courage of Gen. Goffe. Soon after this affair the main body of the Indians withdrew^ from this part of the valley. The people of Hatfield immedi- ately began the construction of palisades arodndthe more thickly 26 built portion of the village, comprising, probably, the southern end of the street ; they also fortified the mill and some of the more exposed houses. Winter set in early and though no attack was made, or seri- ously apprehended, the time passed gloomily enough. Most of the families from Deerfield, and some from Northfield, were gathered here and a company of thirty-six, under Lieut. Wil- liam AUis, were quartered upon the people. Food appears to have been plenty, but the deep snows (north of Brookfield the snow was "mid-thigh", deep) and severe cold prevented much communication with other parts of the Colony. Shut .up and shut out from the world as they were, thoughts of the pfist and apprehensions for the future must have weighed heavily on their hearts. Mr. Russell's report of the numbers slain in Hampshire county in 1675 is as follows. Aug. 2, at Brookfield, 13 Sept. 28, at Northampton, 2 Aug. 25, above Hatfield, 9 Oct. 5, at Springfield, 4 Sept. 1, at Deerfield, 2 Oct. 19, at Hatfield, 10 Sept. 2, at Northfield, 8 Oct. 27, at Westfield, 3 Sept. 4, at Northfield, 16 Oct. 29, at Northampton, 4 Sept. 18, at Muddy Brook 74 Total, 145 The number here given is probably too large by two. Of these not less than forty-four were inhabitants of the county, the rest were soldiers from other parts of the Colony. From the testimony of a Christian Indian, employed as a spy, the River Indians had their main winter quarters on the west side of the Connecticut, above Northfield, though a few wintered to the eastward of Albany. They returned to Hamp- shire county near the end of February. When the fishing season arrived they established them- selves, as usual, about the Falls above Deerfield. They also planted large fields of corn, both at Northfield and Deerfield. This would go to show that" they considered themselves still masterg of the situation, and we can readily credit the testi- mony of Thomas Reed, an escaped captive, that "They are secure and scornful, boasting of great things they have done and will do." About the middle of April, 1676, a party of these Deerfield Indians went down to Hatfield North Meadow and drove off eighty head of horses and cattle. They kept these cattle for a time in the common' field, previously well fenced by the settlers, at the t)eerfield meadow, where Reed saw them, and ''Found the bars put up to keep them in." The report which this man Reed brought in of the defiant manner of the savages and their quiet possession of the culti- vated fields of the expelled settlers, seems to have roused the spirit of the English and induced them to take the offensive. "This being the state of things," writes Mr. Russell, "We think the Lord calls us to make some trial what may be done against them suddenly without further delay ; and therefore the concur- ring resolution of men here seems to be to go out against them to-morrow at night so as to be with them, the Lord assisting, before break of day." ^ This was written May 15th, and the determination was carried into effect the i8th, when about one hundred and fifty mounted men, chiefly from the river towns, with Benjamin Wait and Experience Hinsdale as guides, started from Hatfield, "To assail the Indians at the falls above Deerfield." The expedition was under command of Capt. William Tur- ner. "They found the Indians all asleep, without having any scout abroad, so that our soldiers came and put their guns into their wigwams before the Indians were aware of them and did make a great and notable slaughter among them. Some got out of the wigwams and fought and killed one of the English ; others did enter the river to swim over from the English, but many were shot dead in the waters ; others wounded were there- in drowned, many got into canoes to paddle away, but the pad- dles being shot, the canoes overset with all therein ; and the stream being violent and swift near the falls most that fell over- board were carried upon the falls. Others of them, creeping for shelter under the banks of the great river, were espied by our men and killed with their swords."* The number of Indians slain, most of them women and children, was probably about one hundred and seventy-five, though the account at the time made it much larger. But this first success in early morning was later in the day changed into a most disastrous rout of the English. The Indi- ans, who were camped on the east bank and on Smead's Island, crossed the river and assailed our men in the rear after they had begun, their homeward march. At the same time a report that King Philip with a thousand warriors was at hand got started and produced a panic. ♦History of Hadley. 2^ Our men got scattered ; Capt. Turner was shot as he wa^ passing Green river ; many lost their way in 'the woods ; and though Capt. Holyoke, the second in' command, conducted the retreat with great bravery and skill, he was followed by the vic- torious savages to the south end of Deerfield meadow. In all, thirty-eight of the English were killed, three of whom were Hatfield men, viz. : Samuel Gillet, John Church and William Allis, Jr. The battle was fought on Friday, but some of the. men who got lost wandered about for two or three days. Jonathain Wells, who was wounded, after severe suffering and several narrow escapes, reached Hatfield on the Sabbath. Rev. Hope Atherton of Hatfield, who accompanied the troops, "After sub- sisting," as he says, "The space of three days and part of another, without ordinary food," came into Hadley about noon on Monday. This double defeat had its natural result. The Eng^lish saw the need of a larger force which could crush by its very weight; and the Indians felt weakened by so great a loss, and contented themselves with securing a stock of provisions, partly by the fisheries and partly by plunder. Their first plundering expedition was against Hatfield, which was easiest of access from their camp above Deerfield. On the 30th of May, while most of the men were away at work in their planting field, a large body of Indians, estimated at between two and three hundred, made a simultaneous attack on the line of palisaded dwellings, on the herdsmen tending the cattle and on the men at work in the fields. Holding theseilast at bay they fired twelve houses and barns, killed or drove awaiy many of the cattle and nearly all the sheep. Seeing the flames of the burning buildings, a company of twenty-five young men from Hadley crossed the river in face of a hot fire from the ene- my and by their daring bravery saved the town. This company lost five of their own number, but so far as appears, none of Hatfield were slain. A large body of troops now concentrated in the valley. About four hundred and fifty came up from Connecticut under Major Tailcott. Capt. Henchman, with over three hundred and fifty men, arrived soon after from the Bay. These scoured the ' country northward and eastward, and efiectually scattered the enemy. In one expedition they "Burnt a hundred wigwams upon an island, ruined an Indian fort, spoiled an abundance of f9 fish which they found in barns under ground and destroyed thirty canoes."* Later they destroyed all the standing corn at D'eerfield and Northfield. Few Indians were seen in the county later than July. They were suffering from famine and disease, were hunted from place to place and many were killed. Some of the women and chil- dren gave themselves up or were taken prisoners. The death of Philip, August 1 2th, appeared to put an end to the war. The main body drew off towards Albany where they were harbored and supplied with arms by the authorities acting under Andros. ' The military operations of the preceding spring, as well as the danger imminent at that time, prevented the planting of the usual extent of ground. The North Meadow was probably not_ put in tillage' at all this year, consequently the harvests were light. Hatfield's Great Calamity. The spring of 1677 op'ened propitiously. Our people planted and tended their fields in peace, and in summer gathered the hay from the intervals. Their sense of security is shown by tbe fact that a number who were driven from Deerfield in the fall of '75 now returned there and commenced to rebuild their houses. Though rendered cautious by experience the .settlers were somewhat hardened by danger. They had the courage and some of the recklessness which is always engendered by constant alarms, peril's, escapes and scouting. "They went about their ordinary business with arms in their hands, and to their solemn ' assemblies as one goeth to the battle," but it was as much from habit as a sense of imminent danger. As the fishing season went by without the return of the Indians to their old haunts, and the period of full summer foliage of the trees, usually chosen beca.use of the better facility for ambush and skulking, was past, they seem to have regarded them.selves as safe for the year. Nd scouts were sent'out and no guards were maintained at home. But Hatfield paid dearly for her fancied security. On the 19th of September, more than a year after the war was consid- ered closed, at eleven o'clock in the forenoon, while the princi- pal part of the men were dispersed in the meadows and unsus- picious of danger, a party of Indians suddenly assaulted the few" men left at home, who just then were at work upon the •History of Hadley. 30 frame of a house outside the palisades, killed three of them and then fell upon the defenceless women and children. , Before help could come they fired seven houses, killed nine persons, making twelve in all, wounded four, took seventeen captives and escaped to the cover of the woods. The boldness and suddenness of the movement assured its success. The people seem to have been paralyzed by the shock and made no earnest effort at rescue. Perhaps the fear lest the captives might be tomahawked, if pursuit was made, and the hope that they would be spared if unmolested, may have had weight. The Indians went that day to Deerfield where they killed one and captured four men, and halted for the night. They spent the second night at Northfield west meadow. They proceeded further up the river and camped on the east side, about twenty miles alcove Northfield, where they built a long wigwam and remained about three weeks. About the middle of October the party, augmented by about eighty women and children, taken in the' neighborhood of Waehusett, moved off crossing the country to Lake Champlain and thence to Canada. With perhaps an individual exception these seventeen from Hatfield, and those taken at Deerfield, were the first captives from the valley that had to endure the sufferings and perils of a march through the then almost impassable wilderness. The captives taken in the two preceding years, with two exceptions, were either burned at the stake or otherwise tortured to death. Of those whose descendants settled Whately, Sergeant Isaac Graves and John Graves were killed; Hannah, the wife of John Coleman and her babe. Bertha, were killed ; another child wound- ed and two taken captive; Mary, the wife of Samuel Belden, was killed ; the wife and daughter of John Wells were wounded , and his daughter Elizabeth, aged two, was killed; the wife of Obadiah Dickinson was wounded, fiimself and one child carried off; Abigail, daughter of John Allis, aged six; Martha, the wife of Benjamin Wait, and her three daughters; Mary, the wife of Samuel Foote, her daughter Mary, aged three, and a young son were carried into captivity. Thus in the three years of the war, twenty seven of Hatfield were killed and nineteen made prisoners. In regard to both life and property, the loss of this town was greater in proportion to population than any of the surviving towns in the valley. "From one-third to one-half the houses were burned and the greater part of their kine, sheep and horses killed or driven off." 31 The story of Benjamin Wait, whose house, situated on the west side of Hatfield street, just south of King'shill, was burned, and whose family were among the captives taken on the 19th of September, possesses both a local and a public interest; and as he was the ancestor of many of our families, it should have a place in these annals. At the time of our narrative he was a young man of about thirty. His family consisted of Martha, his wife and three little girls, Mary, six, Martha, four, and Sarah two years of age. Inured to woodcraft and familiar with Indian customs, it is not diflBcult to imagine what was his first impulse when he reached the ashes of liis home and learned the fate of his young wife and babes. But he had prudence as well as haste, and wisely, as the event proved, took counsel of his sec- ond thoughts. But after enduring a month of siispense. Wait, and his friend, Stephen Jennings, whose family was also among the cap- tives, determined to ascertain the fate of their friends and re- deem them if found alive. With a commission from the[gov- ernor of Massachusetts they set out from Hatfield, October 24, to go by way of Westfield to Albany, then the only traveled route to Canada. The authorities at Albany, who were on friendly terms with the French and their Indian allies, blocked their plans and after vexatious detentions, sent them on a false pretense to New York. At length, through the intercession of Capt. Brockhurst, they were sent back to Albany with a pass. It was now the 19th of November and it was the loth of December before they got on their way. A Frenchman whom they hired to act as guide was bribed by the Dutch governor and deserted them, and they were forced, to engage a Mohawk Indian to conduct them to Lake George. This savage, who proved true to them, fitted up a canoe and made a drawing of the lakes by which they were to pass. "They were three days passing the first lakes and then, carrying their canoe two miles over a neck of land, they entered the great lake which the second day they, hoping to trust to the ice, left their canoe, but having traveled one day upon the ice they were forced to return back to fetch their canoe, and then went by water till they came to the land, being windbound six days in the interim ; so as they made it about the first of January, having traveled three days without a bit of bread or any other relief but some raccoon's tlesh which they had killed in an hollow tree. 32 "On the 6th of January they came to Chamblee, a small village of ten houses belonging to the French, only by the way they met with a bag of biscuit and a bottle of brandy in an empty wigwam with which they were not a little refreshed; and jn traveling towards Sorell, iifty mile distant, from thence .they came to a lodging of Indians, among whom they found the wife of Jennings."* They found the remainder of the captives at Sorell and, to his great joy, Wait found a little daughter added to his family, Pe named her Canada.* Unable to secure all the captives without the assistance of. the French authorities, they went down to Quebec. Here they were well entertained by the governor, who granted their desire and assigned them a guard of eleven soldiers for the journey to Albany. They left Quebec on the 19th of April and Sorell on the 2d of May, hav- ing redeemed all the captives then living. They reached Albany on their return May 22. From Albany a messenger was sent to Hatfield with letters telling of their success and need of assistance. But Wait's let- ter will tell its own story: Albany, May 23,1678. To my loving friends and kindred at Hatfield: — These few lines are to let you understand that we are arrived at Albany now with the captives, and we now stand in need of assistance, for my charges are very great and heavy; and therefore any that have any love to our condition let it move them to come and help us in this strait. Three of the captives are murdered, — old Goodman Plympton, Samuel Foote's daugh- ter, Samuel Russell. All the rest are alive and well and now at Albany, namely: Obadiah Dickinson and his child, Mary Foote and her child, Hannah Jennings and three children, Abigail Allis, Abigail Bartholomew, Goodman Coleman's children, Samuel Kellogg, my wife and four children and Quintin Stock- well. I pray you hasten the matter for it requireth great haste, Stay not for the Sabbath nor shoeing of horses. We shall en- deavor to meet you at Kanterhook ; it may be at Housatonock. We must come very softly because of our wives and children. I pray you hasten them, stay not night nor day, for the matter requireth haste. Bring provisions with you for us. Your loving kinsman, BENJAMIN WAIT. ♦Hubbard's New England. ♦Canada Wait m. Joseph Smith, son of the John Smith of Hadley who was slain in Hatfield Meadow, May 30, 1676 ; she was the grandmother the late Oliver Smith. 33 P. S. — At Albany, written from mine own hand. As I have been affected to jours, all that were fatherless, be affected to me now, and hasten the matter and stay not, and ease me of my charges. You shall not need to be afraid of any enemies. After stopping at Albany three days they started, May 27, and walked twenty-two miles to Kinderhook, where they met men and horses from Hatfield. They rode through the woods to Westfield and all reached home saffely after an absence of eight months. "The ransom of the captivfes Cost above ;^2O0, which was gathered by contribution among the English," Copies of this letter and one from Stockwell were carried to Medfield and thence sent to the governor and council at Boston. On their receipt, the following official notice was issued: "Knowing that the labour, hazard and charge of said Ben- jamin Wait and his associate have been great we recommend their case with the captives for relief to the pious charity of the elders, ministers and congregations of the several towns ; that on the fast day [previously appointed] they manifest their char- ity by contributing to the relief of said persons. And the min- isters are desired to .stir up the people thereunto. For quicken- ing this work we do hereby remit a copy of Benjamin Wait's letter to be read publickly, either before or upon that day; and what is freely given is to be remitted to Mr. Anthony Stoddard, Mr. John JoylifF and Mr. John Richards, or either of them, who are appointed to deliver and distribute the same for the ends aforesaid." Signed, "Edw. Rawson, Sec'y. Wait rebuilt his burned house, but it is not strange that he was a changed man. The next few years were years of peace. He reared a family of three hardy boys, in addition to the girls already named. When the news reached Hatfield of the French and Indian attack on Deerfield, Feb. 29, 1704, though nearly sixty years old, he was the first to start for her relief. He was killed by a musket ball in the meadow fight of that morning. We cannot refrain from saying, all honor to the brave scout and Indian fighter ! His name is not often mentioned among the heroes of those wars, but among them all, among those who did most for their country's welfare and stood firmest in the hour of her early peril, who dared, suffered, made no boasts and claimed no official distinction, who offered his life in sacri- fice for those he loved, among those whose heroic deeds have made this beautiful valley immortal, no name is brighter and no 34 one's memory is more worthy to be cherished than, that of Ben- jamin Wait. Thus did our fathers receive early the baptism of blood, by which they did enter into living covenant with Him who was their "Life and breath and all things; " whose Providence was their strength and defence and whose grace was their hope. And thus by a "fiery trial" were they fitted to give vital force to the life, shape to the character and firm foundation to the social and religious institutions which are our favored heritage to-day. CHAPTER IV. AN INTERIM OF PEACE., 1678 — 1700. Among the names of interest, as connected with these an- nals, added to the list of settlers since our last enumeration, were those of Robert Bard well, who is first introduced to the valley in a military capacity, Thomas Crafts, a refugee from Deerfield, earlier from Roxbury, Eleazer Frary of Medfield, Benjamin Wait, William Scott, probably from Waterbury or Farmington, Ct., Samuel Marsh from Hartford, Samuel Gillet from Windsor, John Wells from Stratford, Ct., and Dr. Thomas Hastings from Watertown. The wastes of war had been great. With the loss of life and buildings, the neglect of the fields and the derangement of trade, everything had been set back. Farm employments had been so difficult and dangerous that only the necessaries of life had been obtained — no more had been attempted — and the brush and wild grasses had made encroachments and the fences were fallen down. In many respects it was like beginning anew. But though sorely crippled the settlers seem not to have been disheartened. They ."-.et themselves in earnest to repair the waste, re-establish their homes and add to their comfort and conveniences. Apple and quince trees were more commonly planted, and now, for the first time, houses were built on the "Hill." west of Mill River. A larger breadth of land was put in corn, wheat, flax, and barley for malting was more commonly raised. The destruction of their sheep had made a scarcity of wool, and these agricul- tural products and malt were needed to meet the increased 36 demand for taxes and as a medium of exchange for some for- eign luxuries which now, for the first time, appear to have been introduced into this part of the valfey. War always loosens the restraints and vitiates the simpler tastes of home life. It engenders a heedless, arrogant spirit, destructive alike of habits of economy and regard for the rights and feelings of others, and brings into play the more selfish passions. Its maxim is that "Might makes right," and hence too often, even in wars of necessity and defence, it comes to be an acknowledged principle that the end sanctifies the means. With the return of peace there usually comes a period of extrav- agance and lawlessness. The quartering upon our people of so many officers and soldiers from the older settlements, many of them of the wealth- ier classes, had introduced new social ideas and awakened a desire for dress and other accompaniments of rank. These mil- itary men were looked upon as their saviors, and,, of course, demandedtheir gratitude and kind consideration. They gladly shared with them their homes and the best provisions their straitened circumstances permitted . . A petition sent to. the Gen- eral '.Court by the. friends of Rev. Mr. Russell of Hadley, whose house was the headquarters of the array, gives us some insight into, this matter. They -say: • i"The .chief gentlemen improved in the affairs of' the war were entertained there, which called for provisions answerable, and was of the best to be had ; that he had to draw divers bar- rels of ale and much wine', arid fruit suitable to the company; and had ho uiore crediffor sufch Company by the week or meal than other men [had] -for ordinary entertainment." Perhaps all couM not command for their guest,s such meats and drinks, but there is no doubt that all furnished "The best to be had." ' Very naturally these- officers, especially the lower grades, who were brought more directly in contact with- the peo- ple, instilled some of their own feelings and social theories into the minds of the young men and maidens. Very naturally the' latter wanted to appear well in the eyes of the former and adopted some notions not exactly consistent with their present impoverished condition. Very naturally they coveted the lux- uries and copied the fashions prevalent at Boston and Hartford. Very naturally linse5'-woolsey had ' to give place to silk&, and laces and ornaments came to be regarded as essential to fully set off natural charms, to the great grief of staid old fathers and mothers and the offepce of the magistrates. 37' The laws of the colony which regulated matters of dress and ornament, and family expenses, and restrained excesses, have been much criticised and often held up to ridicule, and sometime adduced in proof of Puritan intolerance and narrow- mindedness. These early fathers certainly differed greatly in opinion from us, but they differed as greatly in condition. Per- haps in their circumstances they were as wise and tolerant as their children. To show the grounds and reasons for their sumptuary laws, as understood by themselves, the act "Against excesse in appar- rell," passed 14 October, 1651, is here copied in full: Although severall declarations and orders have bin made by this Courte against excesse in apparrell, both of men and weomen, which have not taken that effect as were to be desired, but, on the contrary, wee cannot but to our, greife take notice that intollerable excesse and bravery hath crept in uppon us, and especially amongst people of mean condition, to the dishon- uor of God, the scandall of our profession, the consumption of estates, and altogether unsuiteable to our povertie ; and although we 'acknowledge it to be a matter of much difiScultie, in regard to the blindnes of mens minds and the stubbornes of their willes, to sett downe exact rules to confine all sorts of persons, yett wee cannot but account it our duty to commend unto all sortes of persons the sober and moderate use of those blessings which, beyond expectation, the Lord hath bin pleased to affoard unto us in this wilderness, and also to declare our utter detestation and dislike that men or weomen of meane condition should take uppon them the garbe of gentlemen, by wearing gold or silver lace or buttons,, or points at their knees, or to walk in greate bootes, or weomen of the same rancke to weare silke or tiffany hoodes or scarfes, which though allowable to persons of greater estates, or more liberall education, yett wee cannot but judge it intollerable in persons of such like condition ; itt is therefore ordered by this Courte, and the authority thereof, that no per- son within this jurisdiction, of any of their relations depending uppon them, whose visible estates, reall and personall, sha'U not exceede the true and indifierent valew of two hundred pounds, shall wear any gold or silver lace, or gold and silver buttons, or any bone lace above two shillings pr. yard, or silk hoods, or scarfes, uppon the penaltie of tenn shillings for every such offence, and every such delinquent to be presented by the graund jury. And forasmuch as distinct and particular rules in this case suiteable to the estate or quallitie of each person, cannot easily be given, itt is further ordered by the authoritie aforesaid, that the selectmen of every tonne, or the major part of them, are heereby enabled and required from time to time to have regard and take notice of apparrell in any of the inhabitants of their 3^ geverall tounes respectively, and whosoever they shall judge to exceede their rancks and abillities in the costlines or fFashion of their apparrell in any respect, especially in the wearing of rib- bons or greate bootes (leather being so scarce a commoditie in this cojntrie), lace pointes, &c. silke hoodes or scarfes, the selectmen aforesaid shall have power to assesse such persons so offending in any of the particulars above mentioned, in the country rates, at two hundred pounds estates, according to that proportion that such men use to pay to whom such apparrell is suiteable and allowed, — provided this lawe shall not extend to the restraint of any magistrate or publicke officer of the jurisdic- tion, their wives and children, who are left to their discretion in wearing of apparrell, or any settled millitary officer or souldier in the time of millitary service, or any other whose education and imploiments have bin above the ordinary degree, or whose estates have bin considerable, though now decaied. Undei; this law, at the March term of the court for Hamp- shire county, 1676, "The jury presented sixty-eight persons, viz., thirty-eight wives and maids and thirty young men, some for wearing silk and that in a flaunting manner, and others for long hair and other extravagancies." Joseph Barnard and his wife Sarah, and his sister Sarah, Thomas Crafts, Jonathan Wells and the wife of Thomas Wells, Jr., "Were fined ten shil- lings." In September, 1682, the selectmen of the five River towns were all "presented" to the Court for "Not assessing, according to law," those of the inhabitants of their several towns that "wore silk" and "Were excessive in their apparel." But the public sentiment had undergone a change. The young man could fight the Indians as well as his father, and personal courage was a passport to favor; and the young men and young women combined and declared their independence. They — the young women — put on all the silks, scarfs and gold rings>they could induce their brothers and beaux to purchase for them and defied the law ! Of course the law was a dead letter. There is another law of the colony, not often referred to but important, as showing the temper of the times, which I will quote in this connection. It will help explain some of the cus- toms of the early settlers, to be described more fully hereafter. It is the order of the court of 14 May, 1656, "Requiring ye improovement of all hands in spinning:" This Court, taking into serious consideration the present streights and necessities that lye uppon the countrie in respect of cloathing, which is not like to be so plentifully supplied from 3$ forraigne parts as in times past, and not knowing any better way and nieanes conduceable to our subsistence than tlie im- prooveing of as many hands as may be in spining woole, cot- ton, flax, &c. Itt is therefore ordered by this Court and the authoritie thereof, that all hands not necessarily imploide on other occa- sions, as weomen, girles and boyes, shall and hereby are en- joyned to spinn according to their skills and abillitie; and that the selectmen in every toune doe consider the condition and capacitie of every family, and accordingly to assesse them at one or more spinners ; and because several families are necessa- rily emploied the greatest part of theire time in other busines, yet, if opportunities were attended, some time might be spared at large by some of them for this worke, the said selectmen shall therefore assesse such families at half or a quarter of a spinner; according to theire capacities. ' Secondly, that every one thus assessed for a whole spiner doe, after this present yeare, 1656, spinn, for thirty weekes every yeare, three pounds pr. weeke of linin, cotton or woollen, and so proportionably for half or quarter spinners, under the penal- tie ot twelve pence for every pound short ; and the selectmen shall take speciall care of the execution of this order, which may be easily effected, by deviding their several tounes into tenn, six, five, and to appoint one of the tenn, six or five to take an account of theire division, and to certifie the selectmen if any are defective in what they are assessed, who shall im- proove the aforesaid penalties imposed upon such as are negli- gent, for the encouragement of those that are diligent in their labour. This "mind" of the court was in force not latterly as a law, but as a custom, for nearly one hundred and fifty years. As a further illustration of the condition of families in those early times and the convenience of housekeeping, and the kind and value of stock and tools upon a good farm, the inventory of Lieut. William Allis, taken Sept. 18, 1678, is herewith ap- pended: In purse and apparrell. Arms and ammunition, Beds and their furniture. Napkins and other linen. Brass and pewter pieces, Iron utensils, Cart and plow irons, chains, stilliards. Tables, pitchforks, cushions, sythe. Barrels, tubs, trays, Woolen and linen yarne, Several sorts of grain, flax, 2 horses, 3 cows, 2 steers, 2 calves, i heifer. ^9 13 ■6 I 9 5 2 I 5 10 2 II 6 7 5 I 19 3 9 6 18 6 II 12 7 20 40 Swine and sheep, ^lO 8 Houses and home lot, ICG Land in South meadow. 114 Land in Great and Little meadow, 136 Land in Plain and Swamp, 20 Land in Quinepiake, 28 13 £4g6 06 6 Pastures. — Cows and sheep were pastured on the "Com- mons" lying to the west and northwest of the street. Young stock of all kinds was "marked" and turned out to run at large. As soon as the cattle became sufficiently numerous, i. e., about 1680, a cow-herd was employed. An agreement is recorded by which a man agreed to keep the town herd from early in May to Sept. 29, for twelve shillings a week, payable in grain. He was to start the herd in the morning by the time the sun was an hour high, take them to good feed, watch them and bring them in seasonably at night. The date, Sept. 29, is named because this was the time when all crops on the intervals were required to be gathered, and after which the proprietors pastured the cows in their enclosed fields until the snow fell. The care taken that none should be deprived of religious ordinances, is evinced in the vote of the town requiring every owner of cows or sheep to take his turn in tending the herd on the Sabbath. Thus giving the cow-herd or shepherd an equal share in the rest and privileges of holy time. Hatfield had two hundred and seventy-three sheep in 169 1. By a law of the colony a dog that bit or killed sheep was to be hanged. Usually the guilty dog was taken to the woods, a leaning staddle was bent down, and a cord was fastened to the top and to the dog's' neck; the clastic sapling then sprung back, with the dog dangling in the air. Sometimes both cats and dogs were hanged at the short end of the well-swipe, as is relat- ed by Sylvester Judd in the History of Hadley. Bashan. — About this time, probably in 1682, the meadows lying north of Great meadow were divided and allotted among the inhabitants. No doubt the planters and mowers, as they worked close up to Little Pond, had often looked wishfully over the ridge to the goodly and fruitful land beyond. No wonder, as they saw its noble oaks and walnuts and its fat pasturage, they named it Bashan. Like the other meadows, this tract was first divided into 41 two parts, now known as Old Farms and West Farms and each of the then fifty-eight proprietors received a lot in both parts. Three or four houses were built on Bashan near this date. The cellar holes of two of these houses and stones used for the chim- neys may now, or could till recently, be seen on land of R. H. Belden, Esq. One of these houses was "fortified," as appears from the records of 1695, but owing to their great distance from the vil- lage and the difficulty of getting to and fro, especially during the spring freshets, and their exposure to Indian assaults, they were abandoned for a time, perhaps permanently, about the time of the breaking out of the war of 1703. When David Graves built in the Straits, thirty years later, some of the timbers from on^ of these Bashan houses was trans- ferred and used in the frame of his dwelling house (the old Stockbridge Tavern). Possibly the Bashan settlement was not finally abandoned till about 1728. The Major Daniel Dennison grant, lying north of the Great Pond in Hatfield and extending one rod into said pond, contain- ing 500 acres, was given by his will to his daughter, Elizabeth, who married John Rogers of Ipswich, Mass. The will was dated 5 Nov., 1688. After she was a widow she sold the whole tract to William Arms for ;^ioo in current money. It was bounded east on Great river, north on Bradstreet's grant, west on Hatfield commons and south on the Great mekdows. This was bought by Mr. Arms as an agent for a company of seven, viz. : William Arms, Joseph Field, Robert Bardwell, Samuel Field, Daniel Warner, Stephen Jennings and Samuel Gunn. The Four Divisions of Commons. — Up to 1683 only a small portion of the lands in Hatfield township had been dis- tributed among the inhabitants. All the River meadows north of Bashan, and all the uplands west of the "Hill" and the Straits road, were lying common and used for general pasturage. But now these upland Commons were divided and apportioned among the settlers. Oct. 21, 1684. — "The town hath agreed t(? divide the Com- mons in the town (except what is reserved for home lots, sheep pastures, etc., ) to every inhabitant, according to his present val- uation of estates ; and the said Commons shall be laid out in four divisions, the first to begin upon the plain behind the Mill and end at the northerly line of the uppermost lot laid out in 42 Mill River swamp ; the second to begin at the north side of the uppermost lot in the Mill River swamp and end at the north: side of the town bounds ; the third division to begin at the northwest side of the highway that goeth towards Northampton and from the hill commonly called Sandy Hill and end at the rising up of the side of the hill called the Chestnut mountain; the fourth division to begin where the third division endeth and to end at the outside of the town bounds.", As will appear from this vote, the whole territory lying westof the River meadows was marked off into two parallelo- grams, one embracing the land between the said River meadows and Chestnut plain road, and the other the tract west of this road. These main divisions were then cut by an east and west line running nearly parallel to though not coincident with the present south line of Whately. The whole of the second and fourth, and nine lots in the third division, also nine lots in the first division lay in Whately. Each Hatfield inhabitant then holding real and ratable estate, sixty-nine in number, received a lot in each of the four divisions. The principle of distribution, i. e., the size of each man's lot was, "According to the present valuation of estates." This, of course, made great diversity in the size of the lots. The allotment thus made in 1684 was confirmed in 1716, and re- confirmed in 1735. The eastern boundary of the second division of Commons was very irregular. For a short distance, it ran on the bank west of the wet swamp, afterwards called Hopewell ; then on the west line of the Gov. Bradstreet farm; and from the north line of this farm to the north line of the town it extended to the Connecticut river. After the division of the Commons according to the vote, of the town of Hatfield, passed 21 Oct., 1684, confirmed in 1716, and reconfirmed in 1735, it was discovered that after settling the boundary line between the towns of Deerfield and Hatfield, that several of the most northerly lots did not run through to Chestnut Plain street, which was the western boundary of the second division of Commons, as they should. We find that the town of Hatfield passed the following preamble and vote relative thereto: "Whereas, the lots in the .second division of Commons in Hatfield were originally laid out running west and by north and east and by south, and the said division was to run to the north 43 side of the town bounds, agreeable to the town of Hatfield records, in ye year 1684. And, whereas, the dividing line be- tween the towns of Hatfield and Deerfield is a line running east and west, as finally settled by the general court. And the com- mittee that was employed to stake out the several divisions of Commons in the year 1743, found several of the northernmost lots in this division were cut ofi' and by running the course of the division met with the dividing line between the said towns, so as to make the said lots triangular. And the proprietors — owners of said lots — are cut off from their just proportion of land, as originally granted them. And it appearing to the pro- prietors that a line run north and south at the west end of the second division is 885 rods, 7 feet and i inch, which is 135 rods, J 2 feet and 5 inches less than the width of said- lots at ye east end. And that each proprietor hath a just claim to have his lot run through said division from east to west. "Therefore, voted thatsaid division be staked out anew and ^ that each proprietor have his proportion, as to the width staked out to him both on the east end and on the westerly part, upon a north line from the northwest corner of the uppermost Mill swamp to Deerfield bounds (according to the true intent of the original grant, as near as may be), and that the several lots in the division be staked out so much narrower on the westerly part, as that the said triangular lots may run through to the highway, on the west side of Mill River swamp, and have their proportion on said west line with the other lots in said division, ' ' We also here give a copy of the record of a preamble and vote recorded in the Hatfield town records, in reference to the fourth division of Commons : At a meeting of the proprietors according to adjournment upon Nov. 14, 1748. It was voted : "Whereas, the committee that was employed in the year 1743 to stake out the second division of Commons in the six- mile grant, in Hatfield, have reported at this meeting that in staking out the fourth division they found there was wanting of land to complete the breadth of each proprietor's lot, as staked out in the year 1716, 124 rods, 3 feet and 6 inches, which les- sens each lot two feet upon ye rod (occasioned by the settlement of the line between this town and Deerfield). The committee have, therefore, lessened each lot in that proportion and set up stakes, marked with the two first letters of each original pro- prietors's name, accordingly." 44 At a meeting of the proprietors of four divisions of Com- mons, in Hatfield, held by adjournment Dec. 5, 1748. "Voted, that the committee chose the third of November last to search the records and enquire of those learned in the law, what method they shall proceed in affect to the second division, and be directed to perform said service as soon as may be, and make report to this meeting at the time it may be adjourned. Then voted, that this meeting be adjourned to Monday, the 12 inst., at one of the clock in the afternoon, then to meet at ye house of Mr. Elisha Allis, innholder in Hatfield." At a meeting of the aforementioned proprietors held by adjournment Dec. 12, 1748, at the house of Elisha Allis: "The committee, chosen Nov. 3, 1748, report agreeable to the direction of the proprietors. They have searched the rec; ords and obtained the advice of some gentlemen of ye law respecting the Commons, particularly the second division, which the gentlemen reduced to writing, and is as follows : Northampton, Dec. 6, 1748. — In the case of the Commons, Hatfield, referred to us. We are of the opinion that the Com- mons are legally brought, a propriety, that each proprietor must have his right in the second, division, this from east to west. The vote in the margin that the course of the lots is to be east by south and west by north, notwithstanding, and to have their proportion at each end. Signed, Tim° . Dwight, Phineas Ly- man, John Worthington." From the foregoing votes of the inhabitants of Hatfield is our authority for the correction of the figures giving the width of the several lots in the second division of Commons, Mr. Tem- ple copying the first, or erroneous records, instead of the records of 1748. As will be seen, the difificulty was at the west end of the division (on Chestnut Plain street). The second division measured from the northwest corner of the Mill swamp lots 885 rods, 7 feet and i inch, while the east end measured 102 1 rods and 3 feet, making a difference of more than 135 rods. These lots in the second division were laid out in half miles and called the first, second, third and fourth half miles. The first half mile extended from Chestnut Plain street east to Alon- zo Crafts' corner, or Claverack road; the second half mile extended to the remains of an old drain about two rods west of C. R. R.R. station ; the third half mile extended to within about 16 rods of the west line of the Gov. Simon Bradstreet grant. The average widening of the lots, as you go from the west to the east, is 31. 19 15 rods to the half mile. We now give the following, copied from Hatfield records, dated Oct. 21, 1684. The first division of Commons began upon the plain behind the mill. The lots run west and by north and east and by south, abutting against a highway westerly ; part of them against the clay pits and stone pits ; part against Mr. Williams' lot, against the land of John Wells, Benjamin Wait and Samuel Belding ; part against the hill ; part against the pond, and part against the hill by the Great swamp, all east- erly, containing in all 69 lots as follows: No. I, Samuel Graves, 33 rods wide. No. 2, Nathaniel Dickinson, Jr ., 9 rods 12 feet. No. 3, Thomas Mason, Jr., 8 rods — No. 4, Town lot, 7 rods — prob. for road No. 5, Mr. Atherton's heirs, 12 rods 14 feet. No. 6, Martin Kellogg, 5 rods 14 feet. No. 7, Samuel Marsh, 9 rods 12 feet. No. 8, William Gull, 26 rods 6 feet. No. 9, John Allis, 48 rods — No. 10, Mr. Chauncey, 5 rods 12 feet. No. II, Benjamin Wait, 20 rods — No. 12, William Arms, 13 rods — No. 13, Philip Russell, 19 rods — A highway. 10 rods — No. 14, John Cowles, 37 rods — No. 15, Widow Graves, ID rods — No. 16, Edward Church, 25 rods — No. 17, Richard Morton, 28 rods 6 feet. No. 18, Obadiah Dickinson, II rods 2 feet. No. 19, Samuel Gunn, 5 rods 8 feet. No. 20, Samuel Allis, 19 rods — No. 21, Widow Fellows, II rods 12 feet. No. 22, Samuel Taylor, 21 rods 6 feet. No. 23, John Hubbard, 17 rods — No. 24, John Coleman, 37 rods 6 feet. No. 25, John Wells, 25 rods — No. 26, Daniel Belding, r3 rods II feet. No. 27, Thomas Bracy, 5 rods — No. 28, Samuel Baldwin, 27 rods 6 feet. No. 29, Thomas and Noah Wells, come in lot 48. No. 30, Thomas Hastings, 9 rods 5 feet. A highway, 10 rods — No. 31, Eleazer Frary, 25 rods — 46 No. 32, Samuel Foote, II rods 14 feet. No. 33> Isaac Graves, 14 rods • 6 feet. No. 34. Walter Hixon, 7 rods 12 feet. No. 35, Joseph Boardman, 5 rods 14 feet. No. 36, Beriah Hastings, 10 rods — No. 37. Samuel Partridge, 10 rods — No. 38, Hezekiah Dickinson, 9 rods — No. 39. John White, 14 rods 13 feet. No. 40, John Field, 20 rods 8 feet. No. 41. Robert Page, 4 rods 8 feet. No 42, Joseph Field, 9 rods 4 feet. No. 43. Stephen Tailors' heirs, 3 rods 10 feet. No. 44. Samuel Kellogg, 15 rods 8 feet. No. 45. Samuel Gillett's heirs, 5 rods 4 feet. No. 46, Daniel White, 24 rods 12 feet. No. 47. Samuel Field, II rods — No. 48, Noah Wells, 7 rods 10 feet. No. 49. John Steel, 5 rods 10 feet. No. 50. John Graves, 15 rods 10 feet. No. 51. Samuel Carter, 5 rods 8 feet. No. 52. Ephraim Beers, 6 rods 8 feet. No. 53. Samuel Billings' heirs, 6 rpds — No. 54. Samuel Wells, 10 rods 2 feet. No. 55. Thomas Loomis, 18 rods — No. 56, John Smith's heirs. 5 rods 3 feet, No. 57. Daniel Warner, 37 rods — No. 58, Joseph Belknap, 24 rods 8 feet. No. 59. Benjamin Barrett, 5 rods 4 feet. A highway. 10 rods — No. 60, Nathaniel Dickinson, 40 rods — The remaining 9 lots are in Whately. No. 61. William King, 5 rods 14 feet. No. 62, Thomas Meekins, Sr., 13 rods 2 feet. No. 63. Samuel Graves, Jr., 9 rods 2 feet. No. 64. Stephen Jennings, 14 rods 10 feet. No. 65, William Scott, 14 rods I foot. No. 66, Samuel Belding, Sr., 31 rods 6 feet. No. 67, Stephen Belding, 14 rods 12 feet. No. 68, Samuel Dickinson, 32 rods — No. 69. Robert Bardwell, 10 rods 4 feet. 1086 rods 1 1 feet. 47 The lots in Whately measure 146 rods, i foot, 6 inches. The second division of Commons, abutting upon a high- way on the west side of the Mill River swamp (Chestnut Plain street so called), and part against the wet swamp and part against the Great river easterly. This measurement is on the west end. No. I, Daniel White, No. 2, Stephen Tailor's heirs No. 3, Walter Hixon, No. 4, Samuel Gunn, No. 5, John Smith's heirs, No. 6, Widow'Graves, No. 7, Thomas Hastings, No. 8, Samuel Allis, No. 9, Mr. Chauncey, No. 10, Richard Morton, No. II, Hezekiah Dickinson, No. 12, Benjamin Wait, No. 13, Edward Church, No. 14, William King, No. 15, John Allis, ^ No. 16, Samuel Kellogg, , No. 17, Martin Kellogg, No. 18, Joseph Belknap, No. 19, John Wells, No. 20, Samuel Marsh, No. 21, John Coles, No. 22, Samuel Dickinson, No. 23, Philip Russell, No. 24, Town lot. No. 25, Ephraim Beers, No. 26, Robert Page, No. 27, Samuel Graves, Jr., No. 28, Thos. Meekius, Jr.'sheirs, 6 No. 29, Daniel Belding, No. 30, Robert Bardwell, No. 31, Samuel Partridge, No. 32, Benjamin Hastings, No. 33, Stephen Belding, No. 34, Samuel Wells, No. 35, Samuel Field, rods feet Inches 28 5 2 3 4 8 2 I 5 6 II 3 16 4 9 II 9 8 9 5 18 9 II 6 14 I 27 7 4 8 9 5 19 12 3 24 14 8 5 6 II 45 II 10 II T3 II 5 6 II 22 5 2 21 2 — 10 — 4 31 12 2 28 5 2 18 4 3 6 14 I 6 14 I 4 9 I 7 II 7 ,6 9 6 12 9 6 9 2 6 9 7 3 9 7 3 12 14 3 9 2 6 ID 15 2 48 No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No; No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. rods feet Inches 36, John Coleman, 31 12 2 A highway, Christian lane, ID — — 37, Thomas Bracy, 5 2 6 38, Isaac Graves, 13 6 6 39, Samuel Belding, Sr., 28 I 5 40, William Scott, 12 14 3 41, Joseph Field, 8 13' II 42, Samuel Foote, II 2 5 43, Nathaniel Dickinson, Jr. , 6 4 4 44, Samuel Carter, 4 9 I 45, Samuel Gailord, 22 5 2 46, Widow Fellows, II 7 10 47, Samuel Billings' heirs, 5 12 — 48, William Gull, 25 2 2 49, Thomas Meekins, Sr., 12 H 5 50, Samuel Gillett's heirs^ 5 6 11 51, John Steel, 5 6 II 52, Joseph Bodman, 5 6 II 53, John Graves, 9 — — 54, included in Noah Wells' . 55, John Field, II 16 5 56, Thomas Loomis, 9 12 7 57, John Hubbard, 9 10 10 58, Stephen Jennings, 7 15 ' 2 59, Samuel Belding, Jr., 15 9 10 60, Samuel Graves, Sr., ^ 8 12 2 ' 61, John White, 8 12 2 62, William Arms, 7 9 II 63, Noah Wells, 4 7 4 64, Mr. Atherton's heirs. 7 10 II 65, Obadiah Dickinson, 6 2 8 66, Benjamin Barrett, 4 2 6 67, Daniel Warner, 20 4 5 68, Eleazer Frary, . 14 8 7 69, Nathaniel Dickinson, Sr. ,21 7 5 70, overplus to Mr. Williams 8 3 ID 879 00 4 The third division as copied from Hatfield records as laid out 21, October 1684, beginning at the northwest side of the highway that leadeth to Northampton and all the sandy hill. 49 rofls feet No. I, Samuel Graves, Sr., 137 — No. 2, Nathaniel Dickinson, Sr., 217 — No. 3, William King, 5 9 No. 4, John Wtite, 13 12 No. 5, Samuel Carter, 5 2 No. 6, William Scott, 13 — No. 7, Eptraim Beers, 6 I No. 8, Joseph Boardman, 5 10 No. 9, Obadiah Dickinson, 13 — No. lo, Robert Page, 4 3 No. II, John Graves, 14 8 No. 12, Samuel Tailor, 19 12 No. 13, Eleazer Frary, 23 I No. 14, Thomas Bracy, 4 12 No. 15, John Field, 18 16 No. 16, Stephen Jennings, 13 9 No. 17, Town lot, 6 8 No. 18, John Smith's heirs, 5 2 No. 19, Walter Hixon, 7 2 No. 20, Widow Graves, ID I No. 21, Benjamin Barrett, 4 15 No. 22, Samuel Foote, II I A highway. 10 — No. 23, William Gull, 25 5 No. 24, Thomas Meekins, 12 3 No. 25, Samuel Wells, 9 5 No. 26, Samuel Balding, Jr., 26 7 No. 27, Daniel White, 23 — No. 28, John Cowles, 34 3 No. 29, Daniel Belding, Sr., 13 2 No. 30, Samuel Dickinson, 29 II No. 31, John Hubbard, 15 12 No. 32, Robert Bardwell, 9 6 No. 33, Martin Kellogg, 5 7 No. 34, Rev. Hope Atherton's heirs. 12 12 No. 35, Thomas Loomis, 7 6 No. 36, Mr. Chauncey, 5 7 No. 37, Stephen Belding, 13 II No. 38, Noah Wells, 7 2 No. 39, Thomas Hastings, > 8 10 No. 40, Samuel Graves, Jr., 8 5 so No. 41, Joseph Belknap, No. 42, Joseph Field, No. 43, Philip Russell, No. 4'4, Thomas Meekins, Jr., No. 45, John AUis, No. 46, Hezekiah Dickinson, No. 47, Isaac Graves, No. 48, John Steel, No. 49, Stephen Tailor, No. 50, Samuel Partridge, No. 51, Daniel Warner, No. 52, Samuel Gillett's heirs, No. 53, Samuel AUis, No. 54, Thomas Wells, with Noah Wells, No. 55, Samuel Marsh, No. 56, John Wells, No. 57, Samuel Field, No. 58, William Arms, No. 59, Samuel Belding, No. 60, Samuel Kellogg, No. 61, Samuel Gunn, No. 62, Edward Church, No. 63, Benjamin Hastings, No. 64, Widow Fellows, No. 65, Richard Morton, No. 66, Nathaniel Dickinson, Jr., No. 67, John Coleman, No. 68, Samuel Billings' heirs. No. 69, Benjamin Wait, No. 70, an overplus of about 1281 6 Ending with ye uppermost lot laid out in Mill River swamp. These lots were laid out east and west bounded by Mill swamp lots highway east, and on the end of the six miles from Great River west. Nine last lots of this third division are in Whately, 147 rods, 16 feet wide in all. The fourth division of Commons, laid out 29 April, 17 [6. This division is bounded east by Chestnut Plain street,, north by Deerfield and Conway, west by the west town line and south by the third division. rods feet 22 II 8 8 12 I 7 5 44 4 9 4 13 5 5 . 4 4 6 9 3 34 3 5 2 17 9 9 I 23 3 10 3 12 2 29 3 14 5 5 2 23 2 9 4 ID 15 26 5 9 I 34 II II — 18 9 6 51 No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. rods feet incbes I, Joseph Field, 9 9 — 2, Widow Graves, 9 15 3 3, Samuel Foote, II 7 — 4, William Arms, 7 12 9 5, Stephen Belding, 13 3 — 6, Robert Bardwell, 9 6 — 7, Samuel AlHs, 19 — 6 8, Samuel Dickinson, 29 — — 9, Rev. H. Atherton's heirs . 9 15 — lo, John Coleman, 32 8 6 II, Hezekiah Dickinson, 8 13 — 12, Samuel Wells, 9 6 — 13, David White, 29 — — 14, John Smith's heirs. 4 I 6 15, John Field, 12 5 — 16, Widow Fellows, II II 4 17. John Steel, 5 8 ID 18, Edward Church, 25 8 — 19. Nathaniel Dickinson, Sr. ,21 16 — 20, Daniel Warner, 20 12 3 21, Eleazer Frary, 14 5 4 22, Samuel Gailor, 22 14 — 23, John Cowles, 32 8 6 24, William King, 5 8 10 25, Samuel Gillett's heirs, 5 II 6 26, John Hubbard, 9 14 6 A highway. 9 — — 27, John White, 8 15 7' 28, Samuel Belding, Jr., 15 16 I 29, Samuel Field, II 2 — 30, Samuel Belding, Sr., 28 13 4 31, Ephraim Beers, 7 — 6 32, Daniel Belding, 12 14 6 33, William Gull, 25 12 4 34, Samuel Carter, 4 10 10 35, Stephen Tailor's heirs. 3 2 7 36, Thomas Wells, with Noah. 1 37, Samuel Partridge, 9 II — 38, Thomas Loomis, 9 16 2 39, Samuel Kellogg, 16 3 II 40, Obadiah Dickinson, 8 , II — 52! No. 41. No. 42 No. 43 No. 44 No. 45 No. 46, No. 47 No. 48 No. 49 No. 50 No. sr No. 52 No. 53 No. 54 No. 55 No. 56 No. 57 No. 58 No. 59 No. 60 No. 61 No. 62 No. 63 No. 64 No. 65 No. 66 No No. No rods 67 68 69 Tlios. Meekins, Sr.'s hr's, 13 Ricliard Morton, Mr. Chauncey, Robert Page, John Allis, Samuel Gunn, Samuel Graves, Sr., Martin Kellogg, Thomas Meekins' heirs, Isaac Graves, Benjamin Barrett; Thomas Bracy, Town lot, Benjamin Hastings, Samuel Graves, Jr., Joseph Boardman, Samuel Billings' heirs, John Graves, Joseph Belknap, Samuel Marsh, Philip Russell, Noah Wells, Thomas Hastings, Walter Hixon, Stephen Jennings, Benjamin Wait, Nathaniel Dickinson, 'Jr., 6 JohnWells, 23 William Scott, 13 28 7 4 45 5 8 5 7 13 4 5 7 9 7 5 7 9 22 10 19 4 8 8 6 20 teet 3 2 10 14 8 15 8 3 II 6 4 6 1 1 15 8 6 3 t4 4 5 9 13 6 2 3 5 12 3 I Inches 6 10 ID ID 7 10 I 8 6 6 10 II 5 6 10 887 I 3 It is proper to say that the lot left for a highway between lots 26 and 27 was never used for that purpose. This would have made the road west between the houses of Horace Man- ning and Donovan brothers, while it actually was built near the house of W. I. Fox, but later changed to south of the pres- ent hotel and the Doctor Bardwell house to accommodate Elijah Allis at the time he built the hotel in 1820, the town assent- ing thereto. Perhaps In this connection it will be proper to say that the method of division of the Commons was upon the estates as Si inventoried by the assessors. The following schedule will show the difference in a few of the valuations : Ichabod AUis, 132;^, 7s; while Josiah Scott, 25;^, i8s; Joseph Scott, 28jC ; Benjamin Scott, 6£ and David Graves, 23;^, 4s, 6d. So the large inven- tory received a wide piece of land, while the small tax payer but a narrow one. The same method of division was used in the dividing of the three-mile addition, now a part of Williams- burg, and also in the division of the 8064 acres, known as the Hatfield Equivalent (the eastern part of Hawley). The three- mile addition was granted by the General Court in 1695 and allotted to the inhabitants in 1740. The Hatfield Equivalent was granted and the allotment made in 1744, on the basis of estates. The man of large estate received a large area, while the man of small estate received but a small amount of it. As the history of Hawley.says: "Verily, to him that hath shall be given, and to him that hath not shall be taken away even that which he hath . ' ' The lots were from two to four miles in length , over hills and swamps and arable lands, but perhaps not over five or six rods wide, wholly unsuited for a farm, while the wealthy man, like Mr. Allis, had a strip" 293 rods wide and three miles long, making over 1500 acres. Among the Whately inhabitants I find the names of John Waite, Abner Dickinson, David Graves, Josiah Scott, Josiah Scott, Jr., Joseph Scott, Benjamin Scott, Elisha Smith, Joseph Belden, Ebenezer Bardwell, who were among the number who had lands in the three-mile addition and Hatfield Equivalent. It will be noticed that allusion is often made to the Mill swamp division . This was a meadow on both sides of Mill riv- er, varying in width from 40 to about 55 rods. These lots were divided among Hatfield residents, only three or four of them lying in Whately. The north lot is now owned by Rufus M. Swift, east of Mill river, and on the west side by Ashley G. Dickinson. It was intended that the north line of the Mill swamp divi- sion should be coincident with the south line of the second divi- sion of Commons. There is really only about 15 feet of differ- ence. The Mill swamp line is about that much too far north to exactly correspond. The lines in the second division run at a different point of compass than those in the Gov. Bradstreet grant, so when the lots extended past the Gov. Bradstreet grant to the Connecticut river there were several lots from 15 to 20 rods wide on the bank of the river that were gores, running to points before reaching 250 rods, the width of the Bradstreet farm. S4 Each lot was reduced in width about two feet to the rod, at the west end of the second division of Commons, so each lot is wedging, and we here give the per cent, of increase in width from Chestnut Plain street to the Connecticut river, for each half mile. The width on Chestnut Plain street is 886 rods, 7 feet, 4 inches, or in decimals 886.4394 rods. Pirst lialf mile, 917.7250 rods. Second half mile, 947.6823 rods. Third' half mile, 979.4722 rods. Fourth half mile, loi i .2054 rods. Increase in all for the second division, 124.7660 rods. The Major Gen. Dennison grant and the Gov. Simon Brad- street grant demand considerable of our attention. In 1659 a grant was made to Gov. Bradstreet of 500 acres, to be located by him by some unoccupied lands on the west side of the Con- necticut river. Gov. Bradstreet had the first choice, and took 500 acres in Hatfield north meadow, and Maj. Dennison took his 500 acres north, of Bashan. This last extended from one rod in Hatfield pond north on the line of the river one mile, and west from the Connecticut river, 250 rods. After much agitation over Gov. Bradstreet's location, the town exchanged with him, allowing him 1000 acres lying and abutting upon the Maj. Dennison farm, and extending north on the line of the Connecticut river two miles, with the width of 250 rods west from the river. This brought the whole of the Bradstreet grant into Whately. In addition to the increased amount of land, the town had to pay Gov. Bradstreet 200 pounds sterling. Gov. Bradstreet died in 1697 and after his death Edward Church, Robert Bardwell and Samuel Partridge were among the syndicate who purchased the farm of his heirs. It is probable that there was a company of 10 interested in the purchase, as I find that Samuel Partridge, Jr., sold to John Belden of Hatfield his interest (i-io) one-tenth part of the Gov. Bradstreet farm. The deed bears date of 11 Jan., 170^^ , really 1702, and conveys his right, viz.: one lot in each of the four divisions ; two lots in the north, or upper mile, containing 50 acres ; the two lots in the southern mile, containing 14 acres, lying east of the highway, as agreed upon by the proprietors, the remaining 36 acres lying west of the said highway, and as yet undivided, to be divided as the proprietors may agree. 55 The boundaries then were as follows: The first half mile, south on the Maj. Dennison farm, north on land of Robert Bard- well, east on Connecticut river and west on the highway ; the second half mile bounded south on land of Robert Bardwell (he owned the north lot in the first half mile and south in the sec- ond^ half mile), east on Great river, west on the highway and north on the south lot in third half mile ; the third half mile bounded east on Great river, west on second division of Com- mons, south on Dea. Church land and north on Robert Bard- well land; the fourth half mile, east on Great river, west on Hatfield woodlands, or second division of Commons, south on Robert Bardwell land and north on Dea. Church land and sec- ond division of Commons. Speculation in land was active and the owners were often changed, and the names' we give as the owners in 1719 were soon entirely changed as settlements in the north part of Hat- field progressed. The proprietors of the Dennison and Bradstreet grants were finally found acting together 'in holding' their meetings and in keeping their records. And having made copious extracts from their book of records, and realizing the importance from a historical point of view, I will now make some extracts from my notes. In 1883 I helped survey out the Bradstreet farm, measuring carefully from south -to the north side and from the Connecticut river west on three points, and found it slightly in excess of 250 rods, perhaps the slight curving in the river bank would account for that, yet at each place measured it was slightly in advance of 250 rods. We will give an extract from the deed of Josiah Scott, Sr . , who owned the uppermost lot, to his son , Josiah , Jr., and he gives the boundaries thus : "Weston second division of Commons, east on Great river, south on land of Dea. Dickin- son and north on the second division of Commons, containing 37J^ acres, 24 rods wide, 250 rods long east and west on which I now live, with the buildings thereon, dated 6 Nov., 1745." Mr. Scott was then 84 years old and was in his old age cared for by Josiah, Jr. But he had formerly lived in the Straits, on the place owned by the heirs of Charles F. Pease, as will appear from these votes passed by the proprietors of the Brad- street farm. "At a legal meeting 16 May, 17 18, voted by said proprietors to allow a highway to run from the upper end of the first (or lower mile) mile, three rods wide to Deerfield road," 56 Thii language is plain and explicit. The upper end of the first mile was near the paint mill of Elihu Belden, the site of Belden's sawmill. This road was afterward moved to accommo- date Mr. Scott, as shown by the following vote ; "Voted, 1 1 May, 1730, by the proprietors of Bradstreet farm. That they allow Josiah Scott, Sr., the use and pre-improvement of the highway to the country road, Josiah Scott, Sr., binds himself and his heirs to said proprietors, that he will allow them a good 'sofish- ant' highway from time to time, and at all times, for the use and benefit, and also to provide and maintain a 'sofishant' great gate, to lead out to Deerfield road." This allowed Mr. Scott to move the road south where the hill was less difiicult. At the meeting held 16 May, 17 18, it was also voted by said proprietors "That we will have a highway to run through the upper mile in the most convenient place." And now we find that Josiah Scott and ifibenezer Bardwell were appointed to make and set up great gates, convenient for carts to pass through. Then the proprietors voted : "The said Scott shall set his up between the' lower and 'upper farm (doubtless mean- ing between the upper and lower mile), and Ebenezer Bardwell shall set his up at the upper end of the two miles." Then they voted to complete the fencing of the lower mile. This was passed by vote of Nov. 27, 1721, and was to be suf- ficient to secure the first or lower mile and, when completed, the fence between the lower mile and the Dennison farm could be removed. And they had a fence at the upper end of the two miles, as they voted March 29, 1726, to maintain their propor- tion of the fence between said farm and Canterbury field and that they in fact took turns in fencing down the river banks. We have sought to show by these extracts that a road existed through the Bradstreet farm two miles, connecting it with Canterbury road to Sunderland, and was practically where it now runs. And also that houses were built in the Straits sooner by some years than has been generally supposed. To further elucidate this last point, I will quote from a deed dated 17 Jan., 1728, from Samuel Wells to Nathaniel Coleman, two lots in Bradstreet's grant, both of Hatfield. After describing the boundaries it says: "With all the buildings standing thereon." These buildings sold by Samuel Wells probably had been the home of Mr. Wells soon after his marriage, about 1710. He removed to Connecticut a few years later. It seems very probable that these buildings were occupied 57 before 1720, as houses were built at an early date on tbe Den- nison farm. It is perhaps proper to say that a syndicate of seven Hatfield men bought the 500 acre Dennison farm about 1700, perhaps a little earlier. These were John Field, Joseph Field, Robert Bardwell, William Arms, Samuel Field, Samuel Gunn and Andrew Warner. They laid it out in seven divisions. Each proprietor was given a lot in each of the divisions from five to 16 acres and 19 poles. They also had in the second division, seven house lots with roads or streets .through the center, on the east side and the north side. There were four house lots on the east portion and three on the west. The west lots were assigned to Robert Bardwell, Samuel Field and Joseph Field. The four ea.st ones were to S. Jennings, Samuel Gunn, William Arms and Daniel Warner. Just how many of these house lots had farm buildings erect- ed upon them I do not know, but several of them did as within my recollection the old cellar holes and debris of demolished buildings remained in plain view, but repeated plowings have wiped out all remains of the cellars. It was and is valuable farm land and found ready purchasers. Even before the hovise lots were assigned we find that John Field had sold to Stephen Jennings. Later David Graves was found here and perhaps his brother, Abraham Graves. The settlement was compact, as our ancestors well knew that in case of Indian wars, isolated dwellings werfe sure to be pillaged and burned and the occupants murdered or dragged into a terrible captivity. As it was they were often fired upon by the bands of ma- rauding Indians and many a bullet hole was made in the board covering to their buildings — some pieces of boards were pre- served for a long time —and the writer was shown one fully 75 years ago as taken from the buildings of his great-grand- father, David Graves. The people of the present day have but a slight idea of the troublous times when at any moment they might be called upon to defend their wives and little ones from the assaults of prowl- ing Indians, aside from attacks of wild animals. Names of the proprietors of Bradstreet grant, 1719. First, or lower half mile. No. I, Samuel Gunn. No. 2, Joseph Smith. No. 3, Ebenezer Bardwell. Second half mile. No. I, John Waite. No. 2, Ebenezer Morton. No. 3, Joseph Smith, 58 No. 4, Samuel Belden. No. 4, Thomas Field. No. 5, John Belden. ■No. 5, John Crafts. No. 6, John Crafts. No. 6, Zachariah Field. No. 7, Josiah Scott. No. 7, Jonathan Smith, No. 8, John Waite. No. 8, Josiah Scott. No. 9, Ebenezer Morton. No. 9, Nathaniel Coleman. No. lo, Nathaniel Coleman. No. 10, Samuel Gunn. No. II, Thomas Field. No. II, John Belden. No. 12, Jonathan Smith, No. 12, Ebenezer Bardwell. No. 13, Zachariah Field. No. 13, Samuel Belden. Third half mile. Fourth half mile. No. I, Jonathan Cowles. No. I, Ebenezer Bardwell. No. 2, Zachariah Field. No. 2, John Belding. No. 3, Joseph Smith. No. 3, Samuel Belding. No. 4, John Crafts. No. 4, Nathaniel Coleman, No. 5, John White. No. 5, John Waite. No. 6, John Smith. No. 6, Ebenezer Morton. No. 7. Ebenezer Morton. No. 7, Jonathan Smith. No. 8, John Waite. No. 8, John White. No. 9, Nathaniel Coleman. , No. 9, John Crafts. No. 10, Samuel Belding. No. 10, Joseph Smith. No. II, John Belding. No. II, Zachariah Field. No. 12, Ebenezer Bardwell. No. 12, Josiah Scott. It now appears satisfactorily that the town of Whately was constituted, or made up, from the whole of the second and fourth divisions of Hatfield Commons or Woodlands, as they were often called, together with nine lots from the north side of the first and third divisions. The nine lots in the first division were 146 rods, i foot and I inch wide ; and the nine lots in the third division measured 147 rods, 16 feet wide, as measured on Chestnut Plain street, which was the dividing line between the divisions, On the west end it measured in all 1025 rods, i foot and 5 inches, while at the east end on the Connecticut river, including the Gov. Bradstreet grant two miles up the river, it measured 1 157 rods, 4 feet and 11 inches, or about 124^ rods on the east end more than on the west end, and the same diminishing of width con- tinued in the fourth division, making all the lots wedging, while in the first and third divisions no such discrepancy appears. The importance of retaining the numbers of the lots will appear when we say that most of the old deeds are for such a lot of land in such a division in the first, second, third or fourth half mile, as the land conveyed might lay. Roads. — The location of the public (in distinction from the proprietors') roads properly deserves attention in connection with 59 the division of Commons, as both were parts of a common plan. Taken together the system devised was at once simple and con- venient, giving each land owner the readiest access to his several lots. The general plan was roads running nearly parallel with the river, at about a mile distant from each other, intersected at nearly right angles by cross roads at convenient distances. All these highways were originally lo rods wide. The "base line" of all the roads was the "Straits," which followed nearly the Indian trail from Umpanchala's Fort to Pocunituck. This was practically the dividing line between the meadows on the one hand and the Commons on the' other. It was very early accepted as a county road. The next in importance, if not in time, was the read over Chestnut plain. When the Commons were first marked off into two parallel divisions in 1684 a space ten rods wide was left between them unappropriated, to be used when occasion should require. This is recognized as a road in the records of April, 1716. The vote of the town laying a public highway here bears date 1756, though several houses had been built on the line some years earlier. And, what is worthy of note, this highway was not surveyed and definitely located till it was done by Whately in May, 1776. Probably the Poplar hill road, the road from Spruce hill south over Chestnut mountain, and the Claverack road, were designated early, but no vote laying them out as highways has been found on Hatfield records. The highway from Deerfield line by Abraham Parker's (previously a "close road," with bars), to the Bradstreet proprietors' highway, near R. T. Mor- ton's corner, was laid out in 1756 and, at the same time, the said proprietors' highway was accepted as a public road. This ran originally south of the cemetery and struck the Straits below the John Waite place. In 1755 a road was laid from the Straits eastwardly "by Ebenezer Morton's" to the road dividing Old farms and West farms, thence to Dennison's farm. Considerably earlier than this a path had been marked out and traveled from the Straits, near "Mother George," northwesterly through "Egypt," to Chestnut plain. This had several branches, one of which was the Conwf^y path, used by the emi- grants from the Cape, in 1763. This was the only feasible road for teams between the east part and the centre of Whately till near the time of its incorporation. The road now known as Christian Lane was originally a reserved lot in the second divi- 6o sioh of Commons and was only a bridle path, or at best a log causeway, for many years. Private roads — or proprietors' highways — all of which had bars or gates, were laid when needed. Such was the path from Hatfield street to Great meadows, and later to Bashan, and later still continued northerly through Dennison farm by the "Old Orchard." Such, also, was the road from the county road near "Mother George" and "Hopewell" and another, further north, from Benjamin Scott's to near Joshua Belden's. But to return to our narrative. The tide of settlement which started northward into Bashan in 1682, was arrested by the breaking out of King William's war in 1688. Taught by past experience the Hatfield settlers had not neglected prepara- tions for a possible renewal of hostilities. They had extended the lines of palisades so that they reached two hundred and twenty-nine rods on one side and two hundred and forty-six rods on the other, enclosing the greater part of the village. The house of Mr. Williams was fortified, as were three houses on the Hill and one at the farms. "Watches" were set at night and "warders," or day watches, were employed from May ist to the time of "The fall of the leaves," the Indians, as a rule mak- ing their attacks while the leaves were on the trees, for better concealment, or in the dead of winter. A guard was always stationed in or near the meeting-house upon lyord's days and lecture days and public meeting days. All males from sixteen to sixty, except those exempted by law, were required to train four days in a year. But now for a time stricter watches, and wards and almost daily scoutings were kept up and, though there were no important battles in the neighborhood, small skulking parties of Indians kept the people on the alert. As early as 1687, Hatfield had a full militia com- pany of sixty-four men. John Allis was the first captain. In 1690, Hatfield had eighty soldiers. To understand the care and cost of these military precau- tions it may be stated that at this time the pay of a private sol- dier was six shillings per week ; drummer and corporal, seven shillings; clerk and sergeant, nine shillings ; ensign, twelve shil- lings; lieutenant, fifteen shillings; captain, thirty shillings; the pay of mounted men, and most of the scouting was performed by troopers, was twenty-five per cent, higher. For subsistence, the price of board for soldiers on the march was eight pence per day, soldiers in garrison, three shillings and six pence per 6i week. Many were billeted in families and fared the same as their hosts. The ordinary rations were poik or beef, bread or dry biscuit and peas. When on expeditions they often carried the Indian food called Nocake, i. e., Indian corn parched and beaten into meal. Sometimes rum, sugar, pipes and tobacco • were furnished the troops. When horses were fed at grass the price per full day was three pence , at hay and provender, six pence. Sept. i6, 1696, the Indians came suddenly upon Deerfield village and took Daniel Belding and two children, Nathaniel and Esther. They killed Elizabeth, his wife, also three children, Daniel, John and Thankful, and wounded Samuel and Abigail, .who recovered, though Samuel's skull was fractured. The remaining children hid among some tobacco which had been hung to dry in the attic, and were not discovered. The middle of July, 1698, four Indians came into the upper part of North Meadow, where men and boys were hilling corn, and killed John Billings, aged twenty-four, and Nathaniel Dick- inson, Jr. , thirteen, and took Samuel Dickinson, aged eleven, and a lad named Charley. They shot at Nathaniel Dickinson, Sr., and killed his horse, but he escaped. This war lasted ten years. Taxes. — The burden of taxation, on account of the Indian wars, was heavy on the young settlement. The "Country rates," nearly the same as our state taxes, assessed on the estates and polls of. Hatfield for the three years, 1675-6-7, amounted to ^117. In 1692 this tax was ^^184. A part of this was payable in grain and part was a money tax. The latter was regarded as especially severe for, according to a statement in a petition sent to the government, "Not one in ten of the inhabitants of the county have any income of money in any manner." In a like petition, Hatfield said "Money is not to be had here." In one or two instances the Court agreed to com- pound the money rates by receiving "Corn at two-thirds the country pay prices." Sometimes a respite or abatement was granted. "In ans' to them of Hattfeild, it is ordered, that the rates of those of that toune who have bin impoverished by the late cruelty of the innemy burning doune their habitations, shall be respitted and left in their hands untill the Court shall give further order therein." [Colony Rec, 30 Oct., 1677]. A single "country rate" was an assessment of one shilling and eight pence on males over sixteen years old and one penny 62 per pound on real and personal estate. Once only m tax was levied on iemal«s. In June, 1695, it was ordered that siaigle women who earn a livelihood should pay two shillings each, be- ing one-half as much as the poll tax of males for that year. The prices at which "country pay" was receivable for taxes were from time to time fixed hy law. Oct. 15, 1650. "litt ds ordered by this Courte that all sortes of corn shall be paid irtto the country rate at these prizes following, viz.: Wheate and bar- ley at five shillings pr. bushell ; rye and pease at four shillings ; Indian, at three shillings, marchantable." The payment of the Province tax of Hatfield in time of war required no transportation. This being a frontier town, *sal- diers were constantly quartered upon the inhabitants who were 'expected to charge the stipulated pricefor subsistence, etc., and this amounted to a much larger sum than the town tax. The charges allowed Hatfield, up to May i, 1676, for -feeding men and horses and supplies for various expeditions, footed up ;^788. In October, 1680, there was still due the town on these war charges ;^400. This was fully paid by the Government feefore i'6'84. Besides the country rate there was a county rate, payable like the former, and at the same prices, in grain; the minister's rate, payable in grain at town prices (which were lower than ■country prices) ; the town rate to discharge town debts ; and various others of special character, -stich as scholars' rates, herds- men's and shepherds' rates, bridge rates, etc. When a rate was duly assessed by the rate-makers the list and the whole matter of adjustment was put in the hands of the constable who settled with each individual and carried the balance (of grain) due to whomsoever was entitled to receive it. To show how accounts with the town were balanced some ^examples, copied from the constable's book, are subjoined; Hatfield, January -20, 1693. Ensign Frary Togoeing to ye Bay deputy 29 days ditto, goeing to ye Bay 10 days at 3s ditto, goeing to ye Bay 20 days at 3s more writeings at money To keeping ye Bull one winter ] To Assessing 3 days at 2-9 j By his Money Rate 4 07 1 MJ 3 00 08 I 05 6 ^10 10 6 04 ir ^3 JSy his Come Rate By Dea. Church 3-1 1 : Wid. Russell pay 2-6 By Rich. Morton 11 -9 By Noah Wells 13-7 : pd. in money ;^3 5 3 By John Wells 6-2 ; Wid. Warner 3-9 ] By money paid him at ;^i 4 9 ) By money paid him at By payment by Sergt. Belding By Stephen Belding, Constable 6i ^ 06 5 II 9 3 18 10 I 14 8 I 08 I GO 3 i? 5 £jo 10 Thomas Nash To bnrneing woods 2 days 4s To goeing out with ye Committee 1-6 By his Corne Rate 3-8 : Sam'l Partrigg i-io Deacon Coleman To assessing 4 days los : allow'ce for trooper 4d jCo By Noah a trooper 4jd : I'art of Town R-ate* los Samuel Graves, Drummer, To- his Sallery for 1695 £1 ; Sam'l Partrigg for Mr. Williams By His Corn Rate 4-4 ; Isaac Graves 7s By his Money Rate 2-7 : Sergt Belding 6-7 /o 05 6 ^0 05 6 £0 10 4 10 4 £1 00 6 II 4 9 T £1 Doctor- Hastings To make up his Salary ;^i2 18 6 ; one Trooper 3d By Sergeant Hubbirt By D. Church 2-9 ; B. Hastings 279 By Dea. Coleman 2-5 ; Doctor's Rate 2-6 By Joseph Field 3-1 1 ; Stephen Taylor 1-9 By Sam. Billing 5.6; D. Coleman 3-8 By Sergt. Wait 6-11 ; Jona. Smith 6-2 By Jno. Cowls i8s ; N. Wells 6-2, Lt. Wait 2-7 By S. Kellogg, Jr., 2-11 ; Wm. Gull 3-10 By Nath. Foote 2-1 ; Jno. Field 13-9 Bypd: to ye Doctor by several By pdi to ye Doctor by several 12 18 * 08 05 6 04 II 03 8 09 2 13' f I 07. 3 od 9 15 ID 4 i6- 2 3 06 5 £12 l& CHAPTER V. SETTLEMENT OF THE NORTH PART OF HATFIEIvD. One reason why the north part of Hatfield remained so long unsettled is already apparent. The Whately plains, Mill-river swamp and Hopewell were favorite hunting grounds for the Indians. Bears, deer and wild turkeys, as well as smaller game, were plenty, and fur-bearing animals abounded in the brooks. Both deer and bears were found here till 1750, and wild turkeys were not uncommon in 1825. Till 1697, eight or ten families of red men, known as Albany Indians, but perhaps a mixed remnant of the Norwottucks, continued to come yearly to Hopewell and, in one or two instances, they remained through the winter. One of their camping grounds was on land now owned by Stephen Belden, Esq. They roamed the woods at will and often came to the village to beg or barter. They were com- monly considered peaceful though they were distrusted and sometimes watched. Two years before, in 1695, a party of these Indians, while hunting near Ashuelot, were attacked and eight or nine of them killed. The English charged the assault upon hostile Indians, but the tribe charged it upon the English. From this date, these visitors became more unwelcome and some restrictive measures were adopted. The number of Indians in the Hopewell camp at this time was twelve men, nine squaws and twenty-three children. Early in October, 1696, four of them, while on a hunting excursion on the east side of the river, shot Richard Church out of revenge for some real or supposed insult received from Hadley men. The murderers were tracked, captured, 65 ■identified, tried, convicted and sentenced, and two of them, Mowenas and Moqiiolas, were "shot to death" at Northampton. This murder led to the disarming of all the Indians then resident in the immediate neighborhood and to such stringent measures as induced them to quit the valley the next spring. Another reason which had an influence to discourage settle- ment here was that plain lands, such as the tract lying next west of the river bottoms, were considered worthless for all pur- poses except for wood and pasturage. But another, and of itself a sufiicient reason, was that Hat- field did not own the intervals north of Bashan, except a narrow strip near the Deerfield line. The Indian deed covered the whole territory, but this conveyed a doubtful title as against the right of eminent domain vested in the Government, and in the act of incorporation there was the condition "Reserving propri- eties formerly granted to any person." For the first forty years the Colonial Government was accus- tomed to give away lands in large tracts to individuals of high civil and ecclesiastical rank, often as an acknowledgment of, rather than in payment for, services rendered the Colony, though in some cases it was in settlement of claims. These individual grants were often made arbitrarily, with little regard to town lines, or even existing town grants. Sometimes the General Court made grants, leaving the location optional to the grantee. Hence a clause was usually inserted in tcywnship grants "Reserv- ing proprieties formerly granted to any person." Most com- monly the grantee had a choice in the selection and commonly chose the most valuable lands. As an instance of the careless way in which the General Court disposed of territory the following may be cited : A grant of eight thousand acres was made to Dedham in 1665, and laid out at Pocumtuck. But when Hatfield was incorporated, five years later, its north line was placed "Six miles from Northamp- ton north line," to conform to the line specified in the Indian deed, which carried said line over into the eight thousand acre grant one and three-quarters miles. The duplication was of course unintentional, and was remedied by granting the Dedham proprietors an equivalent lying northwardly of their first sur- veyed grant. Settlements. — Mr. Temple gives several reasons why Whately was not earlier settled. We deem one or two reasons, not mentioned by him, as more potent than those enumerated. 66^ First. The population of Hatfield had not becoinesufr- ficiently numerous to compel, or even induce, the sparse popular tion; to leave their pleasant homes, where each additional matr served to add to the feeling of security — that could not be founid by isolation. Roaming bands of Indians were liable to attack any weak or comparatively defenceless position or habitation,, even as' late as 1745, and so in the war at a later period, 1 750 to 1761,. when we finally captured Canada. It will be noticed that from the commencement of thia war our forces acted upon the defensive. In 176 1 we finally stopped the incursion of Indian marauders by capturing Canada. Our forces commenced acting on the aggressive early in that wan.. It had been a time of general peace fiom 1726 to King Geovg*i's war in 1744. During the time of peace settlements had been, made in the Straits, which Mr. Temple considered worthless, except for wood and pasturage. Then Hatfield did not owirthe. meadows north of Bashan, not as a town, yet Hatfield, people did; having purchased the Dennison and Bradstreet. grants. So it will be seen his reasons assigned are fallacious. Second. The Commons comprising the whole town- of Whately were outlying lands. These were cut into narrow strips extending from c m and one-half miles to two or three and a. half long, some of them were not over four or five rods. Forty- nine of the sixty-seven lots in each division were less than 15, rods; wide; with several less tjian five rods. Now, while these- lots were held by persons to whom they were granted, the idea of; settling, on the lot for the purpose of making a farm was practir cally out of the question. As soon as these lots began to be sold off, we find that settlements were made. But you can but notice that after the capture of Canada, and safety was assured', settlers, came in with rapidity and in a short space of time, only about ten years later, the settlement was incorporated as a- dis' tinct.town.- As an illustration of the method taken to acquit a farm, suitably; compact to warrant a location and the erection of suitai- ble farm buildings, we will give a few examples. Deacon Joel Dickinson bought a part of lots on the west end, extending, east oDEihalf mile, Nos, 29, 30, 31, 32 and 33, giving, him a width of a little over 53 rods, or a farm of 53 acres. Benoni Grafts: bought on the east side of the road, in the second' divi- sion, lots 57, 58, 59, 60 and 61, extending east half of amile; giving, ai width: of some over 53 rods. Here were four lots from 67 seven tomnerods each and only one lot of 15 rods. No oncof thaesE would have sufficed for a farm alone. So until tire owners .were willing ±0 sell -so as to make a compact farm, there was no .attempt'-to build. We think I3ie owners of the Gov. Bradstreet grant were dif- TferentlyTsituated as Samuel Wells built on his lot about ryro to irjrs, as near as we can now get at it. He sold in 1728 aradre- mioved to -Hartford, Ct., where he died. Josiah Scott, ;Sr., buiilt on the Deerfield road, yet in Bradstreet's, probably as early as -171&. lifter, about 1728, he built farm buildings one and one- half miles north for his son, Josiah, Jr. After the d«ath df his iwife she went to live with Josiah, Jr., and March 6, 1745, deeded :hrmlh« upper iarm, located at the extreme north part of Bxad- cstreet's, for 400 pounds. His son, Josiah, Jr., ■was a man 46 years cofagfe at this time, and was living on land that his father owned and buildings that he had built for his son, after .the close of Queen-Anne's war, in 1713. ZBnilding in the Straits commenced after the close of tiie war, from 17:23 to 1726, and quite a number of houses were Ijuilt, but you will notice that they were all in the Bradstreet ^rant, and in no other part of the town until the aggressive war in 1754-61 against Canada was commenced, and ended in its capture from the French, and all fear of Indian raids from that prolific source had ceased. B(RADSTREET'S GRANT AND DENNISON'S GrANT. — In 1659, about the time the township of Hadley was allowed to the petitioners from Connecticut, a grant of 500 acres was made to Mr. Simon Bradstreet, one of the magistrates and afterwards Governor of the Colony, and five hundred acres to Maj. Gen. Daniel Dennison. They had liberty to locate these lands "At any place on the west side of the Connecticut river, provided it be full six miles from the place intended for Northampton meet- ing-house, upon a straight line." Bradstreet, who had the first choice, took his five hundred acres in Hatfield North meadow ajad Dennison took his north of Bashan. Dennison'sfarm ran one mile north and south on the river and west two hundred and fifty rods. As the North meadow included nearly one-fourtlj part of the valuable interval granted to Hadley and was not "Six mites from Northampton meeting-house," the town petitioned to have Bradstreet's grant vacated, but without avail. After a five years' struggle the town, out of justice to the west :side pro- 68 prietors, was obliged to purchase of Mr. Bradstreet the North meadow, for which he exacted 200 pounds and one thousand acres of land elsewhere. "In answer to the petition of Samuel Smith, for and on the behalfeof the touneof Hadley, the Courte judgeth it meete to grant the thousand acres of land mentioned in their petition, next to Maj. Gen. Dennison's land, to the toune of Hadley, on condition that they make agreement with the worshipful Mr. Bradstreete for the five hundred acres lying within the bounds of their said toune. 18 May, 1664." From this act of the Court, it would appear that Dennison's and Bradstreet's farms adjoined, though Bradstreet's west line was one mile from the river, while Dennison's was only two hundred and fifty rods. Bradstreet's north line was the upper side of the wood lot lying northward of the Elijah Allis farm and his west line was a little to the westward of the Straits road. His length on the river was one and a half miles. Gen. Dennison died in 1682, and some years after his farm is found in possession (probably by purchase) of John Field, William Arms, Robert Bardwell, Daniel Warner, Samuel Field, Samuel Gunn, Joseph Field and Andrew Warner, who, with their successors, held and managed it as joint proprietors till after 1735, and is all in Hatfield. Gov. Bradstreet died in 1697. His farm, like Dennison's, was purchased and held in joint proprietorship, though each owner had his specified lots. It appears from the proprietors' records, that this farm was first divided into two parts, the northern part, known as "The upper mile," the southern part, known as "The lower mile." Each of these was cut in by a road running north and south where the present river road runs. For the purpose of regulating fences, highways, etc., the two proprietaries of the Dennison and Bradstreet grants united and held joint meetings and kept common records. Hopewell. — The original name of this tract was "Wet Swamp," but it was called by its present name as early as 1700. The name appears to have been at first applied to the swampy lands lying west of Dennison's farm. It now has a more gen- eral and indefinite application. "1700, J.nnuary 3. A record of eight lots in the Wet Swamp, alias Hopewell, in Hatfield: To Samuel Partridge, Sen., the first lot, being fourscore rods in length, twenty-six rods in breadth, the lines running west by north half a point, from the west, E. by S. half a point, containing thirteen acres. To Ensign Eleazer Frary, second lot ; Et. Dan'l White, third ^9 lot; To Ensign Eleazer Frary, fourth lot; John Graves, Sen'., fifth lot; To Samuel Graves, Sen., deceased, his heirs, the sixth lot; To John Graves, deceased, his heirs, the seventh lot ; To Samuel Dickinson, Senior, the eighth lot." All projected improvements in this portion of the town were arrested by the war known as Queen Anne's war, which broke out in 1703 and lasted till 1713. It was during this war, Feb. 29, 1704, in the dead of winter, that the combined French and Indians made the memorable assault on Deerfield, where a nominally Christian nation outdid in cruelty the barbarities of savage warfare. It does not fall within the scope of this narra- tive to depict the terrible scenes of this massacre, as they have often been faithfully portrayed. Twenty-two Hatfield men were in this fight, three of whom, Samuel Foote, Samuel Allis and Sergt. Benjamin Wait, were killed. Those of our name taken captive were : Mary Allis, Hepzibah Belding, Sarah Dickin- son, Mary Field, Mary Field, Jr., John Field and Mary Frary. No more severe battles occurred in the valley, but the Indians in small parties hung around all the towns and kept the settlers in a state of constant alarm. Ebenezer Field of Hatfield was slain at Bloody Brook, Oct. 26, 1708. No traveler was safe by night or by day. Ordinary business was transacted only under protection of the militia. April II, 1709, Mehuman Hinsdale of Deerfield, while re- turning from Northampton with his team, was captured by two Indians and taken to Chamblee. Probably the capture took place in what is now Whately. He had no apprehension of danger because the leaves were not out. In the ten years of the war the number slain in the county was one hundred and three. One hundred and twenty-three captives were taken, of whom twenty-four were killed or died on the, way to or while in Canada. As it was determined by the Colonial Government to main- tain the Deerfield settlement at all hazards, this became the frontier town ; and consequently Hatfield was less exposed than in previous wars and the local history has less of public interest for record. In this war the Government paid a bounty of ;^io for Indian scalps, when taken by enlisted soldiei^s, and ;^ioo for each scalp brought in by the volunteers. Massachusetts passed an act November, 1706, "For raising and increasing dogs, for the better security of the frontiers." In 70 October, 1708, Connecticut appropriated ^50, "to bring up and maintain dogs to hunt after Indians." It does not appear, how- ever, that they were of any service in killing or capturing armed Indians. Indians. — Indians continued to reside in Whately for many years after its incorporation at intervals, at least, if not permanently. Three families or "lodges" were in the west part of the town, as within the distinct recollection of Orange, Chester and Charles Bardwell, sons of Lieut. Noah. One cabin was north of where Edwin Bardwell built his house. He — Edwin — told me that he had often heard his uncles relate stories regarding them. "The old brave would get bravely under the influence of liquor and then fall to abusing his .squaw and the young ones. They often had to interfere and calm him 4own." The land west of Edwin's house contained large quantities of black ash suitable for making baskets and they made and peddled these. There were two more huts or cabins southwest of the southwest schoolhouse, one near the peculiar round knoll, and another east of the house of Willis F. Wait, some twenty-five or thirty rods just under the hill near the Haydenville road. These Indians were all well known by the Bardwell brothers after they were men grown. Then just north of the land known as "Old Fields," west of Wells Dickinson's, was an Indian known as Samson Johnson or Johnson Samson. He had several sons, Eph, Dave and Cyrus, the last named being half negro. The boys used to work around in Whately, Conway and Deerfield as late as 1835. After the birth of Cyrus, the old brave tied up his squaw and whipped her most unmercifully and gave her a lecture that I have often heard, but will not relate here. An anecdote is related of Josiah Scott, Sr. , to the effect that for three successive nights he dreamed that a family of Indians, living somewhere about a mile from his house, were in a starving condition. He was profoundly impressed by the vivid recurrence of the same dream that something was wrong with his Indian neighbors, and, after eating his breakfast, took his gun and started out in the deep snow. On the way to the Indian's cabin he shot a bear. Upon reaching the cabin he found them sick and entirely destitute of food — really in a starv- ing condition. He went back, dressed the bear and gave them the meat, and afterwards carried them other things. For this kind act, it is said, that in all the wars between the settlers and 71 Indians there never was one bearing the name of Scott harmed by the Indians. These or other Indians lived just south of Sugar Loaf mountain, on land now owned by John N. White, Esq., or the Fuller place. One more'story is related of Joseph Scott. One Sabbath morning a deer was seen eating hay where he had fed his cows and his wife urged him to shoot it, but he said no, if the Lord intended that he should have the deer he would send him again on some other day. This proved true for the deer came and he shot him. Snowshoes. — These were Indian inventions to enable them to travel over deep snows in hunting. Their value was demonstrated in the attack on Deerfield, as the country was then deemed impassable from the great depth of snow lying on the ground. In March, r704, the General Court ordered five hun- dred pairs of Jsnowshoes and as many moccasins, for use on the frontiers. One-fourth of the number were intended for Hamp- shire county. On the return of peace, in 1713, the frontiers were pushed out northerly and westerly. A permanent settlement was effected on the Housatonic river, at Sheffield. Northfield, after being twice abandoned, was permanently occupied in 17 14. From this time to the close of the fourth Indian war, which lasted from 1722 to 1726, nothing of general interest occurred in this part of the valley. A block house, named Fort Dummer, after the then Governor of Massachusetts, William Dummer, was erected in the spring of 1724, about two miles south of the present village of Brattleboro, where a garrison was main- tained which served a valuable purpose in protecting the lower towns. The only notice extant of any incursion into this town is the foUcJiCving : "June 18, 1724. Benjamin Smith, son of Jo- seph of Hatfield, was slain, and Aaron Wells and Joseph AUis taken when they were loading hay, about three miles north from Hatfield street." There was just enough of danger to make people cautious and put them constantly on their guard. The period from 1726 to 1744 appears to have been one of assured peace. The out lands for home lots were now more freely tiken, houses were built in more exposed situations and the proprietors of Bradstreet's farm prepared to locate nearer to their valuable intervals. One house in each neighborhood was "picketed," and the settler depended upon this and his own vigilance and musket for defence. CHAPTER VI. WHATELY SETTI,ED. During the intervals of peace the owners of the lands in the north part of Hatfield, now embraced in the town of Whately, began to build farm buildings. Before Queen Anne's war one house was built within our town bounds, that of Samuel Wells, in 1710. This was a half mile or more north of the cluster of houses on the Major Dennison farm. This was afterwards sold to Nathaniel Coleman and was near the site of Jerry Hafeys' present house. Later, Josiah Scott, Sr., built where is now the house of the late Charles F. Pease. As early as 1718 the pro- prietors built a road from near Frank D. Belden's to Deerfield, or Straits road, and the said Scott was to erect gates to prevent the incursion of cattle. Next, we find several families located near the fortified house of Joseph Belden, probably not later tha^n 1730. Joseph Belden's house was on the site of the present Bartlett house, on what we term Bartlett's corner; so then, we have south of Bel- den's, Josiah Scott, Sr., David Graves, John Waite and Elisha Smith while at the north we have Josiah Scott, Jr., Lieut. Ebenezer Bardwell, and probably Elijah Scott (perhaps he lived with his brother. Josiah, Jr.,) and Benjamin Scott, who lived with his father, Josiah, Sr. When about 75 years of age he lived, or was living with his son, Jo.siah, Jr., north of Bartlett's and he made a deed of that portion of his farm to his son, Josiah, Jr. Lieut. Ebenezer Bardwell, and perhaps a Mr. Goss, built north of Bartlett's corner, near the Scotts. So we find that the 73 josepli Belden house was central, and was the one to be forti- fied, and was enclosed with palisades, surrounding from a half to three-fourths of an acre of land. There the families and their stock could be secure from molestation by predatory bands of Indians. We will only mention a few of the more prominent early settlers : Abraham Parker, who built in Canterbury, on the north lots in Hatfield, near the Deerfield line, in 1749, Joseph San- derson, 1752, both from Groton, and brothers-in-law; David Scott, 1752; Thomas Crafts built in 1751; Benoni Crafts, in 1760 or '61, built his house; Dea. Joel Dickinson built in 1750 or sooner; perhaps 1748, directly east of the stockade monument ; Moses Frary built where is now the fine residence of George B. McClellan, at an early period; Dea. Simeon Waite built on Christian lane in 1760; Daniel Morton built on the Rufus Dick- inson place in 1758 or '59 ; Samuel Carley built on the R. M. Swift place, from 1764 to '56. As we give in detail all of these we will use no more space in metitioning others. Having given much time and labor to the subject of the place of location, or residence, of many of the earlier settlers of Whately, and had valuable assistance from that untiring and persistent antiquarian student, Chester G. Crafts, Esq., I have endeavored to give as near as may be the several places of resi- dence of those who first occupied the premises, with lists, more or less complete of those who have succeeded them, to near the present time. Also giving, when practicable, the original number of the lots in the several divisions and, when known, the year of building the house, or as close an estimate as we are able from data in our possession. I will give them in alphabet- ical, rather than in chronological order. Ai,Lis, Elisha, of Hatfield bought of Thomas Crafts the western end of the Crafts farm, beginning 190 rods west of Chestnut Plain street, of lots number 44 and 45, in 1769, and erected farm buildings on the Easter or Mt. Easter road to Con- way. The house was built some 20 rods jiorth of the present house of Irving AUis. This was first occupied by Capt. lyucius A His and subsequently by his son Col. Josiah Allis, who came on the place in the spring of 1775, then by his son Elijah Allis. In 1826 Daniel Dickinson bought the farm and built the present commodious house and some of the extensive farm buildings. The Dickinson heirs sold to Elliot C. Allis, and it is now owned by^his son, Irving Allis. 74. Allis, Elijah, removed to the center of the town and was in trade several years where William Cahill now lives. In 1820 he built the hotel where he remained until 1830 and then built on the farm, in Bradstreet's grant, where Silas W. AUis, his grandson now lives. This farm had several owners — two houses were upon it. The hotel property was sold to Levi Bush and has had many owners, among them being Loren Hayden, Darius Stone and several others. Allis, Russell, lived several years where now is the Alonzo Crafts house. He bought, April 13, 18 14, the place first owned by Joseph Belden, now known as Bartlett's corner. His son-in-law, Zebina Bartlett, lived with Deacon Allis and kindly cared for the old people in their declining years. Then Zebina W. Bartlett occupied the place and since his decease, George D, Bartlett has resided there. Before Deacon Allis was Joseph Belden, Jr., then Aaron Pratt. Deacon Allis built the small cottage house east on the road to the cemetery for his son-in-law, Thomas Marsh, about 1816. Allis, Daniel, owned and lived on the farm since owned by David Morton, Capt. Rufus Smith and son, Henry. The house was removed 1855, or thereatfbuts and the farm was sold to Hiram Smith and E. Smith. Munson. The farm is off the main road about 60 rods north, with a private road leading to it. Allis, Austin, a son of Daniel, lived at what used to be called "The City," on the east side of Poplar Hill road next north of the bridge over West brook, formerly owned by James Cutter, built about 1815. The place has since been owned by Sumner Smith and his heirs. There was an old house on this site, torn down to give place for the new structure. It was then an old house and no clue to the original builders can be obtained. AsHCRAET, John, lived in the Straits, about opposite the old Gad. Smith place, and Ashcraft built the cottage house about 1848. It is now ow'ned by Henry C. Pease. There had previously been a set of buildings on the place and probably occupied by Nathan Hastings and others before him. This place is in the Bradstreet grant. Ashcraft, David, lives on the place built by Chapman Smith about 1842. This is also in Bradstreet's grant, and is about 40 rods south of the road leading to the cemetery. Atkins, Solomon, Sr., lived in a house in the Straits on the east side of the road, near where is the house built by John 75 Woods and now owned by the heirs of Charles F. Pease. The old house, torn down, was built probably by Josiah Scott and occupied by his son. Mr. Atkins came from Middletown, Conn. , about 1778. Atkins, Solomon, Jr., a tanner and shoemaker, bought the place where Hubbard S. AUis now lives and built the house before 1788, as he owned the place before Martin Graves bought it in 1788. As near as I can learn he bought in 1786. He also built the square house, now the Congregational parson- age, for one of his sons, probably Enoch. These are on lot No. 34, second division of Commons, on the east side of Chestnut Plain street. Sold to Stalham AUis, March 20, 1826 and the square house in 1834. Abercrombie, Robert, about 1779, built a house on the place now owned by William H. Atkins. He came to Whately in 1776. He married a daughter of Abiel Bragg and bought 55 acres of land of Mr. Bragg and put up a house. This has been owned by niany people, among them Pliny Graves and E. A. Atkins. Alexander, Joseph, lived about 1795 or '96, on the Ru- fus Sanderson place, or where old Peter Train and his son, Tvcmuel, lived. The house was built about 1761, on Poplar Hill Toad, fourth division of Commons. * Alexander, I^evi, about 1831, built the house at Canter- bury, since owned by Alfred Gray, George Bates, William H. Fuller and now by John N. White, probably on lot 68 or 69, second division of Commons. Allen, Thomas, came from Connecticut, 1770, and lived in a house at the lower end of the Straits, west side of Deerfield road, probably on lot 13, second division of Commons, south of Josiah Gilbert's some few rods. Afterwards occupied by Ben- jamin Bacon and was sold in 1791 to Elijah Smith. The houste was gone at least seventy-five years ago, when I was a boy. Bacon, Benjamin, came from Connecticut in 1774 or '75. Lived in the Allen house at the south end of the Straits and sub- sequently removed to the gamble-roofed house, afterwards vacated by Martin Graves, 1788, now owned by the Quinn fam- ily. He lived with his son, Philo, and died in 1814, aged 87 years. Bardwell, lyiEUT. Ebenezer. As early as 1736, he built a house a half mile or more above Bartlett's corner, jtoTj- ably on land that was owned by his father, in the upper half 75 mile in the Bradstreet grant. This contained 50 acres. His father died in 1732. In 1752 he sold the place to David Scott and built in the fourth division of Commons, on lot No. 63. This was then on the road that was afterwards built across the wet land north of G. W. and A. J. Crafts' house, where it was originally laid. This he sold to David Scott Dec. 30, 1760. He then built what is generally known as the Dexter Dickinson house. This he sold to Gideon Dickinson, the father of Dexter, and it is now owned by Jonathan W. Dickinson. Then he and his son, Ebenezer, Jr., lived at first in a log house in Clayerack about two and one-half rods south of the present structure, in 1778, then built the farm house now going to decay (1899). This is on lot 22, second division of Commons. Bardwell, Samuei,, son of Lieut. Ebenezer, in 1766 lived on lot No. 68, fourth division of Commons, at the place now owned by Wells Dickinson. He sold in 1768 to Nathaniel Hawks and removed to Ashfield. He bought the east end of lot 68, fourth division of Common^, of Joseph Billings,, March 5, 1760. Bardwei,l, Ebenezer, Jr., son of lyieut. Ebenezer, com- monly known as "Captain George," lived and died at the house built by his father and himself in Claverack, as did his son, Asa and grandson Horace, who left the place to Walter W. Bardwell. BardwelI/, Lieut. Noah, came from Hatfield in 1762, bought part of lot 20, fourth division of Commons, a.nd built a log house the year before his marriage. At a later period he built the large house that he opened as a hotel. This is on the Poplar Hill road. When he came out to Whately, a good dis- tance from West. brook, there was no road and travelers had to go by marked trees. The large house has had many owners and is now owned by Samuel Wills. BardweIvL, Orange and Chester, bought the farms on "Dry hill" that were owned by Capt. Amasa and Jonathan Edson, and occupied both places. I do not know whether the Edson brothers built the farm buildings or not. The Bardwells bought the two farms in 1797. Bardwell, Charles, built an addition to the house where George W. Moore lives, on Poplar Hill road. There was a small house or shop built there before, but for or by whom, I do not know. Bardwell, Capt. Seth, built the house, about 1833, on 77 the site where Abram Turner, Jr., lived, at the foot of the hill from the Chester Brown place and next above the Elder Good- nough house, on the west side of Poplar Hill road. He also built, about 1840, on the new road near the woolen factory that was burned, the house occupied by Lyman A. Munson. Baedwell, Edwin, built, about 1850, a house and farm buildings nearly opposite his grandfather's, where his son, Charles E., now resides. Bardwell, Otis, built a house and farm buildings east of the southwest schoolhouse near the bridge over the West brook, in 1830. The place is now occupied by his son, Henry W. Bardwell. Bardwell, Dr. Chester, built the house, recently owned by Dennis Dickinson, in 18 16 or '17. It is now occupied by Mrs. G. W. Reed. Bardwell, Chester, Jr., boughtthe Dea. Daniel Brown place about 1859. Now owned by his son, Hiram Bardwell. Bardwell, Spencer, bought the Elder Goodnough place. He sold that and bought the Dea. Davis Saunders place on Mill hill, opposite the mill pond, about 1865. Now owned by Dea. Francis G. Bardwell, his son. Bardwell, Chester 3D, son of Asa, built the house and farm buildings, in r840, on lot 50, second division of Commons. Since owned by Charles R. Crafts, then by Thomas Flinn. Bardwell, Sherman, built the house at the Straits, since owned by Luther G. Stearns. Now occupied by Dwight Dick- inson.. Bragg, Abial, came from Watertown and bought the Calvin S. Loomis place and 115 acres of land of Dea. Simeon Waite and his son, Gad. The buildings are on lot No., 37, but his farm included parts of lots 37, 38 and 39, on the north side of Christian lane and south of the road, and parts of lots 34, 35 and 36. Mr. Bragg sold in 1787 to Dr. Benjamin Dickinson. Eleazer Frary bought of Mr. Bragg five acres, now known as the Alonzo Crafts place. After Mr. Frary came Simeon Graves, Luther Wells, Amasa Lamson and Franklin Graves who pulled down the old house and built the present one. Alonzo Crafts built a large barn and tobacco barn. It is now owned by Fred L. Graves, the blacksmith. Bardwell, Cotton, bought the Wm. Mitchell place, sold that and bought the Chester Brown farm about 1870. This place is now owned by Victor D. Bardwell. His son, Edward W., bought the John and David Scott place. 7» BartIvETT, Zebina, bouglit in 1.803, the Plioy Oravses place. He afterwards bought the Dea. Russell AUis. place, now known as Bartlett's corner, and since owned by Zebina W., and now by his son, George D. Bartlett. Barnard, Ebenezer, perhaps with his father; Joseph- Barnard, bought the part of the Capt. Oliver Shattuck farm which was annexed from Deerfield, in 1787. They came, from Sunderland, and were succeeded by William, and another house was built for Ebenezer. William was followed by his twin sons, William and Walter, and the last named sold to Noah Dickinson. It is now owned by his son, Hiram R., or the heirs of Noah. ^ Belden, Joshua, from Hatfield, built near Belden's ferry where Frank D. Belden now resides. Joshua was succeeded. by his sons, Reuben and Aaron. Aaron removed to Amherst and Reuben to North Hatfield. Elihu took the old farm and now Frank D. has possession. This is near the north part of the second half mile in Bradstreet's grant. The place- was bought of many different parties, and some west of the road, as late as 1806. Belden, Dea. Elisha, built on Chestnut Plain street about the time of his marriage in 1764. The house is on lot 22, second division of Commons. Since his decease it has been owned by Jacob Walker, William Mather, Chester Wells, LuJte B. White, J. Pomeroy Dickinson, J. A. Elder, and now by William Cahill. Deacon Belden sold to Jacob Walker in 1883, his house and home lot, reserving a fine farm farther east. He built the house on lot 22, second division of Con>mons, on the Claverack road, where he died in 1808. His son, Elisha, Jr., and his son, Allen, and son, Edwin M., followed. It is now owned by John Halloran and son. Belden, Joshua, Jr., settled near the south line of Whately in the Bradstreet grant. He bought the farm, Feb. 5, 1796, including the buildings thereon. It was probably on this farm that the first set of farm buildings in the limits of Whately were built, by Samuel Wells, about 1 710 or '12, and afterwards sold to Nathaniel Coleman; most likely where Jerry HafiFey lives. An old house was torn down by Richard Tower Morton early in his married life and the present structure erected. The old Joshua Belden house was built about 17^7 or '88, now owned by Nicholas Haffey. Belden, Augustus, built a house that stood where now 79 are the more pretentious premises of Stephen Belden, on the west side of tlie Straits road in the Bradstreet grant. Beiden, Seth, built the house that stood where A. W. Nash built his nice residence, now occupied by his son, Charles W. Nash. Belden, Francis, built first a small house and afterwards ■put i»p a brick house. This was burned and his son, Alfred, built anew. The farm was partly a portion of his father's land and the first house was built in 1797. This was all in Brad- street's grant. Belden, Shaylor F., built a house next north of Jerry Haf- fey's about 1840. This has been occupied by his son, Alfred S. Bird, Enoch, built a house and farm buildings on "Grass hill," about 1790 to '94. His farm was located one mile from the east line of the three-mile addition to the east line of his farm, on the road from the Jonathan Waite house and the Capt. Rufus Smith place on the east side of the road, probably in the •fourth division of Commons. The buildings have been gone a long time. Brown, Edward, built as early as 1761 on the west side of the Poplar Hill road, where now stands the barn of Austin Brown,, his great-grandson. He bought parts of lots 27, 28, 29 and 30, fourth division of Commons. Probably his house was on lot 28. Brown, Isaiah, son of Edward, built from 1795 to 1800, a hous" on part of the old farm of his father, and south some 20 rods or more. The house was built on the west side and barns on thfi east. This was later owned by Dea. Daniel Brown, and now by Hiram Bardwell. Brow.n, Josiah, son of Edward, bought the Abraham Turner farm, 116 acres and sixty-three rods, in November, 1782, for ;^fi6t). The deed describes him as of Colchester, Ct. Two exceptions are made in the deed, one of two acres sold to Ed- mond Taylor, and forty rods sold to Nathan Starks, in the southwest corner, where is the house known as the Elijah San- derson place and the Austin Allis place now owned by Sumner Smith's heirs. The farm contained parts of lots 39, 40, 41 and f2, in the fourth division of Commons, bounded west by Poplar Hill road. The house .stood north of the Easter road and has been gone for years, but the barn remains. Brown, Lieut. John, built on the west side of Poplar Hill i©ad on parts of lots 46 and 47, fourth division of Commons. 8o He bought these lots in 1769 and built about 1772 or '73, but I do not know which lot he built upon. He kept house here be- fore his marriage, Dec. 5, 1776, when he married his house- keeper. This was afterwards owned by his son, Chester, who built a new house, and then by his son, Myron, who sold to Cot- ton Bardwell, and it is now owned by Victor D. Bardwell. Brown, William Austin, built a house on the ea^ side of Poplar Hill road opposite of where the liouse of Edward Brown stood, and on part of the old farm, about 1840 or '41. Now owned by his daughter, Mrs. Elisha L. Grover, Brown, Joseph, about 18 10, bought a house about twen- ty-five rods south of the house built by Elijah Allis and his son, Josiah, in 1830. This house was probably built by Abner Nash, a brother of Joseph, who had a house a little north of Abner 's. Both houses are gone, the one vacated by Joseph Brown being pulled down about 1833. These two houses were both in the Bradstreet grant. The Nashes were here some time before 1783. When first married he lived in the Isaac Smith house, in thq Straits. Bush, Lkvi, Jr., came to Whately about 1823. He bought the Dr. M. Harwood place where William lyoomis lived. When Loomis removed to Haydenville Mr. Bush bought the place. It has been occupied by C. R. Chaffee since the death of Dr. Harwood. Chapin, Dr. PevEz, bought the Dea. Joel Dickinson place east of Stockade monument, at the junction of the "Mother George" road. It is probable that Dr. Chapin built the present house. The land now belongs to David P. Wells. Dr. Chapin bought this farm in 1778. It was made up by parts of lots 29, 30. 31, 32 and 33, second division of Commons, fifty -three rods, eight feet. This extended north from land of Rev. Rufus Wells to land of Martin Graves. John Lamson bought the lot later owned by John Crafts, where Lamson built the old gable- roofed house that was for many years a hotel kept by Lamson, and later by John Crafts. It was destroyed by fire. In its dilapidated condition it was a nest for gamblers and worse criminals, and was doubtless burned by general consent some- wh^ere in the 40's Thus the good people disposed of what was an intolerable nuisance. Crafts, Thomas, from Hatfield, built on the west side of Chestnut Plain street, fourth division of Commons. He bought parts of lots 44 and 45 and built his house in 1751, as the book 8i account of his brother, Benoni, charges Thomas for labor, a part of which was for tending mason on his house. After his death his son, Seth, continued on the homestead then his sons. Dexter and Noah, and now Seth R. Crafts owns the place. Crafts, Benoni, brother of Thomas, came from Hatfield, probably with Thomas and Gains. In 1760 or '61 he built a house on the west side of Chestnut Plain street in the fourth division of Commons, having bought parts of lots 59, 60, 61 and 62, running west one-half mile, and built a house in 1760 where now stands the house of George W. and Asa J. Crafts. It is Supposed that his brother. Gains, was a half owner of these lots, as he built a house a little farther west, but for some reason failed to marry. He sold oyt his interest to Joel Graves, and he later to the sons of Reuben and grandsons of Benoni. Eras- tus lived in the Joel Graves house where his children were bom, while Cotton and Caleb lived at the old house. The Gains Crafts house, which was never plastered, was torn down about 1837. ' Crafts, John, son of Thomas, bought the gable-roofed house of'Joel Lamson, about 1773. This was near the site of Samuel Lesure's house. Justin Morton informed me that the year he was 14 years old the Lamson house and Moses Graves house were built. The Moses Graves house was built by John Waite. Jr., before his marriage and his first son, Solomon, was born Oct. 15, 1768, and as Uncle Justin was boni in 1760 the probabilities are that he got two stories mixed, as he told me one day that a butternut root would travel as fast as his old black mare could and he could easily drive her forty miles in a day. The lots were No. 32 and 33. Crafts, Moses, built a log house, north of where George Brown lived, on the north part of his father's farm, on the west side of the road, abcut 1778. This he removed to Claverack, near the crossing of the Northampton Extension railway, on lots of No. 14 and 15 in the second division of Commons. This was pulled down and farm buildings erected in 1806 by his son, Thomas. This is now the ell part of the house erected by Thomas and Elbridge G. Crafts in 1840. John M. Crafts now lives there. Crafts, Graves, bought in 1785, of Benjamin Wait, a log house where nearly all of his great family were born. About the time that his son, Israel, was married he built a frame house which has been remodeled, raised up a story and otherwise im- 82 proved, making it a beautiful residence. The place contains parts of lots 51, 52 and 53, fourth division of Commons and extends west. Graves Crafts was succeeded by Israel and be by his son, Charles D., and the property is now owned by Dan- iel Dickinson's heirs. Crafts, Joseph, built a house on Mt. Esther; on the road to West Whately known as Easter road, west of the place known as "Coon dens." This was about 1785. This house has long been gone and a butternut tree is growing in the cellar hole. A large family was raised here, and some strange thoughts passed through my mind as I sat upon the beautiful grass plot and followed in my mind the eight or nine children born to them. I thought of their childish gambols and plays more than a hundred years ago, and traced their active and useful lives in the several states where they were scattered. Then looking over the ground where never more will a house exist, I won- dered why a man of common sense should ever locate insuch an out-of- the-way, as well as unsuitable,, locality. Crafts, Eli, built the house now owned by Micajah Howes about 1855, on the street sometimes called "lyover's lane." Crafts, Sii,as, built the house on the east side of Chest- nut Plain street on lot 55, second division of Commons, now occupied by Dwight L. Crafts. The house aud farm buildings were erected about 1847. Cutter, James, lived in a house on the east side of Pop- lar Hill road, on the .south side of the bridge, several years. This he sold, with an acre of land, in 1829 to Reuben JeMBey for $200. Who built the house, or when, I do not know, and it has been gone more than fifty years. Crafts, Rufus, built a house in Claverack, on tbe'east side of the road, in 1810 or '11. This was afterwards owned by his son, Ralph E. Crafts, and now by his son, Bela K. Craite, Crafts, Chapman, built the house on the opposite side cff the road in 1842. He moved to Wisconsin, and Prof. Robert D. Weeks lived on the place several years. Then Ralph ^E. Crafts bought it. Crafts, James M., built a house on the Daniel Morton place in 1866. This was burned in 1873, with most of the other buildings, together with over 100 cases of tobacco and most of the farming implements and household fixtures, entailing a loss of fuUy $10,000 above the insurance. 83 Crafts, Chester G., built the house east of the depot at Bast "Whately, in 1867. This is now owned by John H. Pease and is on lot 37, second division of Commons. Coleman, Nathaniel, lived in a house where Jerry Haf- fey now lives. This was probably occupied by many families-, a« this is the place where it is supposed Samuel Wells built not far from 17 10. In a few years he sold it to Nathaniel Coleman, perhaps after he removed to Hartford somewhere about 1712 to '15. The deed, dated 17 June, 1728, conveys the property to Mr. Coleman probably removed from Whately, and. it is quite probable that the Nathaniel, who lived and died in Whately, spiihgs from the same stock. H« was born in 1742 and died in 1-816 and, I think, this was the first house built in our town limits, about 1820. R. Tower Morton tore down the old house and built the present structure. Carlos Swift lived there some years and several others, including George Dane, before it was bought" by Mr. Hafiey. Nathaniel Coleman was in town in 1771, and was taxed. CoLKMAN, Noah, came from Hatfield. He bought of Moses Frary the George B. McClellan house and owned the land on both sides of the road. That on the east side was in the Mill swamp division, while that on the west side was in the third division of Commons. It is possible that the first house on this farm was built by Moses Frary as he owned a large lot in the Mill swamp division, but he only remained in Whately a very few years when he sold out and removed to Ashfield, but if he sold to Noah Coleman, as it looks as though he did, then it is sure- that as he was well off financially, that he fitted up the place in good shape, had no children, and they adopted Seth Frary, son of Eleazer of Hatfield, and he inherited the entire estate. Coleman, Niles, came from Connecticut in 1773 on lot No* 2-1, second division of Commons. The house was a little north of Thomas Flinn's. At that time the land belonged to Reuben Belden who owned the mills at West brook, and it was this farm that Belden gave by will to Whately for educational purposes, but his conditions were such that the town felt compelled not to accept the gift. Castwell, TnoiiAS, built a house about 1779 or '80 on "Grass hill, " about a third of a mile south of the Jonathan Waite place, on the east side of "Grass hill" road, near the house of Mr. Bird. This, I think, was burned. 84 Carley, Samuel, owned a house as early as 1771. He built, as early as 1766, where now stands the house of Rufus M. Swift. Carey, Richard, was a son of Dea. Joseph Carey of Williamsburg. He built a house, probably as early as 1788, on the road leading to Williamsburg some thirty rods west of the house of Elihu Harvey, just on the southwest corner of the lot where the Dry hill road crosses the Williamsburg road.' The house has been gone probably fully sixty years. CooLEY, Benjamin, was born in Deerfield in 1773. His mother died in 1776 and Benjamin was taken by Benjamin Scott, Sr., and brought up by him in the old house that occu- pied the site of the present one. The old house was torn down and Mr. Cooley built the present structure which he sold to Israel Scott about 1830. This lot contained twenty acres, twelve of which were in Bradstreet's grant and eight in the second divi- sion of Commons. He was a civil engineer and manufactured surveyors' implements, a very ingenious man. CooLEY, I/EMUEL, lived for some years where R. M. Swift resides, when he removed to "Gillett's island" in North Hat- field, as that neighborhood used to be called. He was succeed- ed by Erastus Graves and he by R. M. Swift. The old house was small and inconvenient and Mr. Graves built the present house. CooivEY, Dennis, a brother of lyemuel, bought the house next north of Ashley G. Dickinson, on the west side of Chestnut Plain street, and it is in the fourth division of Commons. It was built by Israel Wells about 18 10, perhaps a few years ear- lier. Then Thomas Crafts owned it and sold to Mr. Cooley, and it now belongs to David Callahan. Cooley, Justin Morton, son of Dennis, bought the store where Morton & White traded, and moved it from near the site of the Town house to just below the Congregational church. He remodeled it for a house and it is now owned by Horace Manning. It had many owners before Mr. Manning, Dr. Phil- emon Stacey, Giles Barney, (a blacksmith) Robert and Dexter Frary, and perhaps others have lived there. Mr. Cooley moved to Springfield and built and kept the famous Cooley house. Curtis, Hosea, was here before 1770. Tradition locates him at two places, one on what has been known as the Todd place, west of Poplar Hill, and again at the Chapman place where James Nolan now resides, west of Mt. Esther. I think he lived on the Chapman place. 8s Dickinson, Dea. JoeI/, built a house as early as 1751. perhaps two years before, directly east of the Stockade monu- ment erected by James M. Crafts in 1884. His farm adjoined the ''Mother George" road and was parts of lots 29, 30, 31, 32 and 33. It extended east to the "Island" road as then called, now Claverack, all in the second division. In 1754 his prem- ises was surrounded by a stockade. The land enclosed con- tained about three-fourths of an acre and in times of danger from Indians the inhabitants resorted to this place for safet}', with their stock. The writer well recollects of hearing his great aunt, Martha (Crafts) Rosevelt, tell the story "That she had helped milk the cows there a fortnight in succession." Dea. Dickinson sold and removed to Conway, and in his old age lived at Phelps, N. Y. He and his sons were tories. Dickinson, Samuei., built a house, about 1774, where Samuel and Horace Dickinson, his grandsons, have since built a fine house. Since the decease of the brothers and two sisters, Mary and Irene, all unmarried; it has been sold to Robert Dick- inson. Salmon Dickinson owned parts of lots 4 and 5 in the fourth division. He built a dairy house about forty or fifty rods west of Chestnut Plain street. This constitutes part of the land on the east side — was parts of several lots — commencing with No. I , and contained as many as eight lots in second division of Commons. About three lots were set off to Oliver, his son, the rest are in the present farm. The house is on No. 4, probably. Dickinson, Oi-iver, son of Samuel, built his house in. 1809 or '10, on lot No. 2, second division of Commons, perhaps on No. I, as that lot is twenty-eight rods, five feet, two inches wide, while No. 2 is only three rods and tour feet wide, and No. 3 is eight rods, two feet and one inch wide. This place is now owned by Cooley B. Dickinson, a son of Champion B. Dickinson, Gideon, from Hatfield, bought in 1770, the farm of I,ieut. Ebenezer Bardwell who built the house, known as the Dexter Dickinson hotise, about 1766. This is almost exactly at the north end of Chestnut Plain street. The land was in both the second and fourth division of Commons, and by a resurvey of the lines between the towns, this place was thrown into Deerfield, but came back when that portion was annexed to Whately, 5 March, 1810, and on lot No. 69, whichever divi- sion claims it. These premises were owned after him by his sons, Dexter and Giles. Dexter occupied the old homestead now owned by his son, Jonathan W. Dickinson, who has erect- 86 ed a new and commodious house in the second division, built in 1862. His new barn is probably on lot 70, second division. Dickinson, Giles, built a house about 1820, on lot 69, fourth division of Commons. After his death it was occupied by his son, Myron, and is now owned by the heirs of Elon San- derson. Dickinson, Asa, son of Gideon, bought the Lemuel and Noah Wells property and the Samuel Bardwell place that was sold to Nathaniel Hawks in 1768. He lived there, after pulling down the Wells' house, many years ago. Since Asa died his son. Wells, has owned the place. , Dickinson, Daniel, son of Gideon, bought the place formerly owned by Col. Josiah Allis, built a new house in 1826 and died in 1830. His sons, Dennis, Rufus and Daniel, re- mained here a few years and sold the farm to their brother-in- law, Elliott C. Allis, and it is now owned by his son, Irving Allis. Dickinson, Dennis, bought the Dr. Chester Bardwell place, ju.st across "Lover's lane" from the hotel, now owned by George and Frank Dickinson, sons of Rufus. Dickinson, Rufus, bought the Dea. Levi Morton farm and the house built on the farm by Horace Morton, son of Dea. Levi, about 1844. This is on "Pleasant hill." After the death of Arnold Morton, he bought the old Daniel Morton property, including the house built by Capt. Charles Morton, a grandson of Daniel Morton, who died in i860. Mr. Dickinson bought it soon after and built a new house and barn in modern style. It is now owned by his heirs, George and Frank Dickinson. The Capt. Charles Morton house was built in 1 8 1 2 . They were all in the fourth division of Commons. The south line is at the cem- etery and extends to the land of Seth B. Crafts, which is lots 44 and 45 so, of course, 43 is the north lot. It quite likely takes parts of lots 39,. 40J 41, 42 and 43 in the fourth division. Perhaps No. 39 should not be included. Dickinson, Daniel, Jr., bought the Graves Crafts prop- erty, about i860, and has done much to improve it. Dickinson, Abnek, came from Hatfield about 1772. He built some twenty-five rods south of the Lyman Dickinson place on the west side of Chestnut Plain street, and of course in the fourth division of Commons. He was succeeded by his son, Alpheus. He sold (and removed to New York state 'and later to Sandusky, O.,) to Eurotus Dickinson. The house was pulled 87 down after 1834, as I^eander Clark lived there, as did George Brown, probably as late as 1840 to '45. Dickinson, Jehu, son of Abner, built the house where his son, Lyman, lived and died, now owned by Ashley G. Dickin- son. This was in the fourth division of Commons, but the bulk of the farm is in the second division, next south of Dea. Elisha Belden's and his lot was No. 22. It includes several lots then owned by Jehu and Capt Henry Stiles, as far south as the cross- road leading to Claverack. Dickinson, Eurotus, was a blacksmith by trade but was also an extensive farmer. About 1833 he bought the house built by Reuben Winchell, postmaster and trader, about 1809 or '10. Bought by Rev. Lemuel P. Bates in 1822. It is now owned by the heirs of Edmond Donovan with the bulk of the Abner Dick- inson estate. Dickinson, Dr. Benjamin, bought in 1786 or'87 the farm of Abial Bragg, with the buildings erected by Dea Simeon Waite. He sold, in ) 804, to Asa Frary and he sold to Jonathan C. Loomis. It is now owned by his son, Calvin S. This is on lot No. 37 in the second division of Commons. Dickinson, Charles, son of Dr. Benjamin, built the house next east of his father's on lot No. 37, second division of Commons, and kept a hotel for a few years. He then, in 1803, sold to Oliver Graves, Jr., a Revolutionary soldier and son of Dea. Oliver Graves. He was succeeded by his sons, Sylvester and Horace, and they by their sister, Harriet Graves, who was a Daughter of the Revolution, of the Betty Allen chapter at Northampton. When she died the chapter passed these resolu- tions to her memory : Whereas, The hand of Divine Providence has removed Miss Harriet Graves, daughter of a Revolutionary soldier, from the scene of her temporal labors. Therefore, be it Resolved, That the Betty Allen chapter at Northampton testify to its respect for her memory and to its sympathy with the relatives and friends deprived of her presence. Resolved, That we mourn the departure of our respected member and Real Daughter. Resolved, That we offer to Mrs. Crafts, of the Betty Allen chapter, our special sympathy. Resolved, That these resolutions be placed upon the records of the Betty Allen chapter, a copy sent to the relatives and to the American Monthly magazine. Signed by the committee and by the regent, 9 March, 189S, Ella Cleveland Clark, Mary Cotton Bassett, Lucy Wright Pearson and Louise Stewart Bartlett Cable, regent. Dickinson, J. Pomhroy, bought the Dea. Elisha Belden house, on Chestnut Plain street, and lived there from 1840 until his death in 1862. Now owned by William Cahill. DouGHKRTY, SAMUEL, lived for some years at the Straits, in the gambrel-roofed house, after Martin Graves sold in 1788. Perhaps he succeeded "Wicked Lige," as they used to call Elijah Smith who was a great trader of horses. Dougherty removed to Belchertowu about 1800. Donovan, Edmond, bought the Dea. Nathan Graves farm on Chestnut mountain, in 184-- Then bought the Hiram Smith place, now owned by the heirs of E. Smith Munson. This he sold and bought the Eurotus Dickinson farm and the Winchell- Bates house on lot 26, fourth division of Commons. The farm is now owned by his sons, John and Peter. Dickinson, Asa, Jr., bought the Lyman Harding farm about 1850, and still resides there. This place was in Deerfield until 1810, and was formerly owned by Samuel Harding, grand- father of Lyman, and he came in 1776. Dickinson, Noah, bought the Walter Barnard farm about r866. This was in Deerfield until 18 10 when it was annexed to Whately. Joseph Barnard and his son, Ebenezer, bought, in 1787, the farm of Capt. Oliver Shattuck and William Barnard. His twin sons, Walter and William, followed him and now Hiram R. and his sisters possess this fine farm. Edson, Lieut. Jonathan, built a house on lot 51, second division of Commons, as early as 1770, about thirty or forty rods north of Cornelia M. White's house, on the east side of Chest- nut Plain street. This was gone years before I could remember. In 177s his daughter, Mehitabel, married Martin Graves, and she told ms about his coming to see her, how he came and how he was dressed, and I give it here to show the contrast with modern times. Then they lived on "Great Plain" up the hill beyond Aaron Dickinson's place towards Williamsburg. She said he had a good horse, with a breast-plate harness with ropes for traces and lines. A jumper, made of two shaved and bent birch poles, with oak poles for shafts or thills, a board across the jumper with a half-bushel measure bottom up and on this a meal bag for upholstery, i Instead of holdback irons a knot in each thill served the purpose. There was no breeching to the harness. Graves wore a good, nice woolen coat and waistcoat that his mother made for him, leather breeches and nice, thick shoes with good buckles, and a cap made from a coon skin with 89 the tail hanging do\#n his back. Really, he was a noble look- ing man she said. They were well-to-do people at that time, stern old Congregationalists, but it shows the change wrought in 125 years. Mr. Graves was nearly 31 years old and his lady- love seven years younger. This she told me while enjoying her after-dinner pipe. I remember well that the muscular old gen- tleman at 75 was as trim and stalwart as a modern athlete. On her table were the books she read — the Bible, Watt's Psalms and Hymns, Guide to Christ, Bunyan's Pilgrim's Progress and the Catechism, These she read regularly every day until a few days before she passed away at the ripe old age of 86 years. Edson, Jonathan, built a house on "Dry hill" about 1785. Afterwards Chester Bardwell bought it in 1797. He sold and removed to Brookfield, Vt., then Dea. John M. Bard- well lived there. I think the house is gone now. Edson. Capt. Amasa, built the house, in 1785, where Orange Bardwell lived and died. The latter bought the place in 1797 and after the death of Orange I do not know who lived there. This house, too, has gone. Elder, James Austin, owns the house built by J. C. Loomis about 1855. Am not sure as to the date. He lived some years on the J. Pomeroy Dickinson place, about 1866. Fay, Capt. William, bought, in 1809, the Israel Scott place in the Straits, on the west side of the road, and in the Bradstreet grant and a portion of it in the second division of Commons. After his removal it was bought by Phineas Frary and then by his son, George W. The house was probably built by Benjamin Scott, Jr., about 1790. Field, Zen as, son of Eliakim, probably built the house where John Field and his sou, Paul W., have since lived, on lots 12 and 13, fourth division of Commons. The first purchase was made May 8, 1764. The house was probably built before his marriage in 1777 or '78. He also built what is generally known as Osee Munson place, in 18 15 or '16. After his decease the original farm was owned by his son, John, and now by Paul Warner Field. Field, Noah, son of Moses of Northfield, bought parts of lots 37, 38 and 39, in the fourth division of Commons and west of Poplar Hill road, 1773, and sold it Feb. 17, 1780, to Asa San- derson. The house was built by Mr. Field, on lot 37, soon after the purchase. The farm is now in possession of Asa T. San- derson, grandson of Dr. Asa. go PooTE, Ai^DEN A., bought the Olivei* Morton homestead after the decease of Mr. Morton in 1844. He bought in 1849 and died in 1858, when Horace B. Fox bought the place Ferguson, Rev. John, bought the Asa Smith place. This house was built about 1825 by Asa Smith. There were several owners before Mr. Ferguson bought in 1837, or therea- bouts. George W. Reed bought it, and now Henry A. Brown owns it. Fox, Selah W., bought the J. C. Loomis house on "I/Over's lane," west of the hotel, about the time of his sec- ond marriage, 8 Nov., 1877. Now owned by J. A. Elder. Fox, Horace B., bought the Oliver Morton place, after Mr. Foote died, and remodeled it, chfs,nging its whole appear- ance and it is now as nice a place as there is in town. The present owner is W. Irving Fox who so nobly cared for his parents in their declining years. Frary, EIvEazer, Jr., son of Eleazer, built the house on the corner of Christian Isne and Claverack road to South Deer-^ field, on lot 37, second division of Commons, in 1779, where, since his removal to Conway, have lived Dea. Russell AUis, Zebina Bartlett. Simeon Graves, Luther Wells, Amasa Lamson, Franklin Graves, who pulled down the old and built the pres- ent house, then Alonzo Crafts. It is now owned by Fred h. Graves. Frary, Lieut. Elisha, was a son of Isaac of Hatfield. In January, 1770, he built a house on a lot of sixty-five acres that he had bought, 2 Dae, 1769, of Silas Smith. It is proba- ble that he had lived with his brother, Moses, on the McClellan farm before he moved to his new home. Frary, Moses, was a brother of Lieut. Elisha. In a plan made of Chestnut Plain street, in 1770, the house of Moses Frary is located on the west side of the street. He sold to Noah Coleman and removed to Ashfield. It has since been owned by Capt. Seth Frary, John B. Morton audE. B. McClellan. Capt. Seth lived with Noah Coleman and inherited his large estate since owned by John Bardwell Morton, his son, Eurotus, Elias B. McClellan and now by his sou, George B. McClellan. Mr. Frary bought, on the east side of the road, thirty-seven acres in the Mill Swamp division and twenty four acres west of the road, in 1790. Frary, Thomas, a son of Capt. Seth, built the Gad Crafts house on Claverack, in 1887. He removed to Hatfield and Mr. Crafts bought it in 1828. It is now owned by Thomas Crafts. 9t I^RARY, Isaac, son of Lieut. Elisha, bought the Eleazer Frary place at West brook, where ^he died 4 Feb., 1850. He also bought the saw and grist mill near Foster Y. Warner's. The house was in the Mill Swamp division, afterwards owned by Isaac Frary, Jr., then by his son, Solomon Munson Frary, and then by his sons, Eugene M., Ernest A. and Edward Frary. Owned by lyincoln B. Sanderson since 1886.. Frary, Maj. Phineas, son of Phineas of Hatfield, bought forty-six acres 20 Feb., 1780, the southerly side of the house where John Smith lived, in the fourth division of Commons. When Capt. Salmon Graves removed from the center his son, Lyman, took the place and now his son, Chauncey A., resides there. Frary, Phineas., Jr., son of Maj. Phineas, lived on the John Smith place and it has since been occupied by Hiram Sraithj E. Donovan, and it is now owned by E. S. Munson's heirs, Lyman A. and Herbert S. Munson. Frary, Silas, son of Maj. Phineas, lived at the foot of Chestnut mountain, on the west side of the road. I do not know who built the house, probably David Ingram. It was an old house 75 years ago, as long as I recollect it. His son, Silas B., lived here until he died in 1851, then Cotton Bardwell. It was torn down 15 or 20 years ago, about 1885. Frary, Horace, lived on the Spruce Hill road some fif- teen rods or so north from the E- S. Munson place. This was built by him about the time of his marriage 1818. I should think it was a small building moved there, as I well recall its old appearance as early as 1825 or '26. Frary, Robert, son of Dexter, removed the upright part of the Samuel Grimes house to the lot on "Lovers lane" when Leonard Loomis built the new part to his house between the Martin Woods and Eli Crafts places, and fixed it over into a dwelling. Now owned by Elisha and Elijah Bardwell. Fuller, William Henry, bought and remodeled the house in Canterbury now owned by John N. White. It was built by Levi Alexander, about 1831, on lot 68 or 69, second division of Commons. Flavin, Michael, bought of Mr. Twoigg about 1870. This was formerly the site of the house of Dickinson Belden which was removed from Chestnut Plain street, having been the house of Capt. Henry Stiles, near the walnut tree in Ashley G. Dickinson's east lot about fifteen rods north of the crossroad leading to Claverack. This was rebuilt by John Callahan, and there have resided here Willard M. Belden and Timothy Two- igg, before Mr. Flavin. Flynn, Thomas, bought of Charles R. Crafts, in 1889, the Chester Bardwell place, built in 1840 and remodeled by Mr. Crafts. Fleming, Thomas, lives on the place built by Jeremiah Waite in 1809, since owned by David Belden, Martin Crafts, who remodeled it, and W. M. Belden. Mr. Fleming has added to the barn and built a large tobacco barn, corn house, etc. He is an excellent farmer. Graves, Dea. Nathan, bought lots No. 4 and 5, in the fourth division of Commons, 20 March, 1761, and on one of these lots built the house and farm buildings. This is on Chestnut mountain. He soon bought part of lots 3 and 6, same division, and in 1762 twenty-nine acres in No. 7, and in 1780 fifteen acres in lot No. 2, making his whole lot sixty-eight rods, ten feet wide. After his decease, in 1786, the place was owned by his son, Reuben, then by his son, Reuben, Jr., and then by his son, Dwight, who sold the farm to J. A. Elder, and it was sold by him to Edmond Donovan. The original house was burned about 1835 and rebuilt by Reuben, Jr. The buildings have gone down. Graves, Dea. Oliver, from Hatfield, built the house now known as the Jerre Graves house,, probably as early as 1766, possibly earlier, and it is now owned by Seth B. Crafts. This is on lot 38 or 39, probably 38, second division of Com- mons, extending east one-half mile. After his death his son, Elijah, and his son, Jerre, lived there. Graves, Oliver, Jr., bought in 1803, the house on lot 37, second division of Commons, in Christian lane built by Charles Dickinson, son of Dr. Benjamin. It had been kept as a hotel. After Oliver's decease it was owned by Sylvester and Horace Graves, and after their death by their sister, Harriet Graves. She died 10 March, 1898, in her 92d year. Graves, Selah, son of Dea. Oliver, built about 1785, on Spruce hill. He bought lots, or parts of lots, 22, 23, 24, 25 and 26, in the fourth division of Commons, beginning one-half mile west of Chestnut Plain street and extending west 240 rods — 114 acres and no rods of land — for which he paid .1^217, i8s. After his death, William and Justus owned the place and after them the farm was cut up. Patrick Daltou new owns the buildings and part of the home lot. w y R M tn W O > ^ bushel of parsnips at 2 010 To 2 lbs 5 oz tobacco at 4d,4 lbs 2 oz salt pork 034 To 9 lbs 10 oz salt pork 059 To 4 lbs 3 oz rolled tobacco 015 8. To 7 lbs 10 oz salt pork, 2 lbs suet at 6d 061 To 6 lbs 9 oz flax 044 To 6 lbs fresh offal, beef, i bushel parsnips 031 To 5 lbs 5 oz salt pork; 17th, 8^ lbs do., 2 lbs sugar at 7d o 10 2 To I lb I oz rolled tobacco, good 004 To I lb do., 4 lbs 15 oz salt pork o 3 7 To 5 lbs 9 oz salt pork, 7 lbs cheese 064 To 5 lbs 10 oz salt pork at 8d, one cheese 4 lbs 9 oz o .5 s 24. To 6 lbs 12 oz cheese, 7 lbs 10 oz salt pork 3 7 3 To 2 lbs sheep's wool at is 6d, i lb tow at 4d o 3 4 To 4^ lbs salt pork, 4 lbs 10 oz cheese at 4d o 411 To 7 pounds 12 ounces flour at is 010 To I2S of Mr. Marsh, old way los o 10 o To I bushel Indian corn 3s of Mr. Graves 030 23. To cash delivered your brother Elijah is id o i i To I oz indigo of Dr. Chapin o o 10 To 6 shillings received of Martin Graves 060 To 2 bushels of rye of Mr. Adkins at 3s 060 £S 4 10 A "run" of yarn consisted of twenty knots, a knot was composed of forty threads and a thread was seyenty-:^our inches in length, or once round the reel. A "skein" of yarn consisted of seven knots. . An ordinary day's work was four skeins, when the spinner carded her own wool ; when the wool was carded by a machine, she could as easily spin six skeins in a day. Dyes. Logwood and indigo were the common dyes in use early; later, madder was sometimes obtained. Cloth made of lamb's wool and of the finer grades of sheep's wool, as well as linsey-woolsey took a beautiful shade of color and was much prized by the young ladies A red riding hood set off to good advantage the plump face and natural tresses of the girls of that day, as did also, the white sunbonnet. Many families did all their own tailoring and dressmaking. Others employed some woman who had special taste and skill ill these arts, w'.io would come to the house twice a year and in a week or so cut and make, with the help of the inmates, the supply for the season. I30 The first professional weavers in town were Robert Aber- crombie in 1779, Abijah Marsh in '82 and William Henderson in '89, but they had to depend for a living in considerable part on jobbing with the fanners. Perez Myrick, the clothier, was here in 1796, Capt. Amos Pratt in 1800. Values and Prices. At this date all values were reck- oned in pounds, shillings and pence. A pound was equal to three dollars, thirty-three and one-third cents, and prices were estimated in currency instead of grain. There was, however, the "cash price" and the "barter price," the latter one-third higher than the former, and ordinary business was largely car- ried on by exchange of produce and homemade manufactures and labor. The wages of labor for an able-bodied man was three shillings (50 cents) a day in haying time, and two shillings for ordinary farm work. The common price of wheat was four shillings per bushel ; rye, 3s; meslin, 3s lod ; corn, 2s; barley, 3s; malt, 2S 5d; flax seed, 4s 6d ; turnips, 8d ; parsnips, 2s; good cheese, 5d per pound ; salt pork, 8d; flax, 8d ; tow, 4d; sheep's wool, 6d ; hops, is ; indigo, lod per ounce. Agriculture. The lands in the valley were found well adapted to wheat and this, with peas and flax, was the first crop raised on the intervals. When these became exhausted wheat was raised on the newly cleared uplands. Peas were at first a favorite and profitable crop, but the yield soon diminished, or was kept up only by manuring, and the pea bug made its appearance and the crop was neglected. After a while, beans took the place of peas as an article of food, though not of traflSc. Rye was not much raised till the wheat crop began to fail when it became, and long continued to be, an important crop. Barley was raised chiefly for the purpose of malting. Meslin, or raixt- ling, which was a mixture of wheat and rye, was pretty generally raised and used both for flour and malt. Indian corn was, however, the staple product of this as of all other parts of the country. The season opened in spring quite as early as at the present day. Plowing began commonly the second or third week in April. Peas, oats and rye were sowed by the middle of the month, barley and flax by the first of May, and corn planting frequently began by May 5th. This crop was hoed three times, the hilling coming in July, as soon as the farmers had finished gathering the first crop of English hay. The corn was picked the last week in September and the first week in October. i3t They conitnenced to mow upland English grass the last of June; and the meadows the second week in July. Rowen was cut the last of August. Rye, wheat and nieslin were ready for harvest- ing about the 25th of July, barley a week later, and oats still later, though before August 15th, Peas were gathered the last of August. Flax was commonly pulled the first week in August, spread and turned in September and was ready to be taken up for "breaking" the last of October. Food. Early in winter every family of considerable means killed fatted hogs and later a cow, the tender parts of which were used fresh and the balance dry-salted, or put in brine for summer use. This salted meat was the basis of the "boiled dish," which was the common dinner of the farmers. Very little fresh meat was used in the warm season. Next in importance, perhaps, came the boiled Indian pudding, which wa."; regarded an almost indispensable part of a good dinner. Many families could say that they had as many puddings as there were days in the year. Indian was also commonly used for hasty puddings and Johnny, or journey cakes and samp. Josselyn, 1674, says of Indian corn: "It is light of diges- tion, and the English make a kind of loblolly of it to eat with milk, which they call sampe.; they beat it in a mortar, and sift the flour out of it ; the remainder they call homminey, which they put in a pot of two or three gallons, with water, and boil it over a gentle fire till it is like a hasty-pudding ; they put this into milk, and so eat it. Their bread, also, they make of the homminey so boiled, and mix their flour with it, cast it into a deep basin, in which they form the loaf, and then turn it out upon the Peel, and presently put it in the oven before it spreads abroad ; the flour make excellent puddens. ' ' Milk and bread or hasty pudding and milk, was a common breakfast and supper dish for children and old people. Pea soup or porridge and stewed peas had not gone out of date, though beans had largely taken their place. Baked beans, as a regular weekly dish, came into use as early as this town was first settled, though it was a dish unknown to our early English ancestors. The bread commonly used was made of rye or meslin flour,- and pie crust was sometimes made of this flour. Wheat flour was used to a considerable extent especially among the well-to-do farmers. Bolts to run by water power were set up in the mills and some families had hand bolts. The flour was not so fine as t32 that now in use and, consequently, was much more healthful. Cakes and pastry made of wheat flour were kept on hand fof "company" and for all extra occasions. Turnips were in uni- versal esteem and use as an essential part of the "boiled dish." By early sowing a summer vegetable was secured, and by sow- ing a second crop to succeed barley, or on new land burned over, they were tender and juicy through the winter. Parsnips were more rare. Pumpkins. Josselyn in his New England Rarities, pub- lished in 1674, speaks of pumpkins, squashes and watermelons as grown by the Indians and also by the English. He mentions a peculiar sort of i-ound ysUow squash which, when cooked and prepared with butter, spice and vinegar, was "The ancient New England standing dish." This is believed to refer to our pumpkin. In his Wonder Working Providence, written 1651. Johnson says, "I,et no man make a jest of pumpkins, for with this fruit the l/ord was pleased to feed his people till corn and cattle were increased." Baked pumpkin and milk was a dish much relished by many. The art of drying pumpkins seems to have been learned of the Indians. In spring and summer this could be soaked and used for sauce as well as for pies. In those early days "pumpkin parings" were as common in the fall as "apple parings" have been since, and made as merry an evening. Apples. A few apples were brought from Hatfield and' Hadley as a luxury, but they did not, of course, come into gen- eral use till the trees had time to grow. The first orchards in our limits were planted by Abraham Parker whose widow made five barrels of cider in 1771, by Joseph Belding, who made that year four barrels of cider, by Benjamin Scott, who made three barrels, and Martin Graves, who made five barrels. I/ieut. Ebenezer Bardwell probably set an orchard where he first built OH the Deerfield road, and also another where he built a mile north of the meeting-house. Parson Wells set trees extensively on his land in the center of the town soon after i77r. He begaii to sell cider and vinegar as early as 1785. The price for apples was IS 6d per bushel, for vinegar, is 6d per gallon and for cider, 5s per barrel. Potatoes. Potatoes were unknown to the first settlers of Whately as an article of food. Justin Morton stated to the author, that "David Graves brought the first potato into town in his saddle bags on his return from Boston about 1765." He 13.1 added, "The boys loved to go over to the Straits and do chores for Mr. Graves for he would give them a potato as pay and we used to carry it home and plant it. I can remember when they did not have any potatoes on the table for dinner." "The culture of the potatoe, in this part of America, was first introduced by the Scotch who settled Nutfield. now lyon- donderry, N. H., in 1718-21." [Everett's Life ot Stark. The same people settled Pelham, Mass., about 1740, and started the cultivation of the potato there. It found its way into Hadley before 1760. At first it was regarded by our peo- ple as an unfit article of food, and the prejudice against it was slow in giving way. Many of the older folks refused to taste it till the day of their death. In some towns it was looked upon as a sort of forbidden fruit. The Rev. Jonathan Hubbard cff Sheffield, who died in 1765, came near being dealt with by the church for raising twenty bushels of potatoes in one year. About 1780, potatoes are mentioned in Parson Well's account book, sold in small quantities of from one-half to one and two bushels. The price was is 6d per bushel. Drinks. — Beer, made from malt and hops, was the com- mon artificial drink used in families at the time Whately was settled. Hops grew wild in many places, but most house- holders had a few hills in their gardens, or beside the pigpen. , Malt was made of barley and meslin and a poor grade of winter wheat mixed with chess. A small family would lay in eight bushels of malt for a year's supply, while larger families would lay in as many as fifteen bushels. There is no record of a malt- house in Whately. The malting for our families was done by Joshua Dickinson of Hatfield, and afterwards by Mr. Wilkie. A strong ale was sometimes made, but the beer for common use was weaker, and was brewed in the summer time as often as once a week. Flip was made from this weaker beer. Barley coffee was considerably used as a breakfast drink — acorn coffee occasionally. Tea and foreign cofifee were rarities at the tables of the common farmers. After apples became plenty, though beer continued to be used, cider became the family drink. Milk punch and flip were the favorite drams for home use, flip of the tavern loungers, and the latter was sold by the mug. After cider took the place of beer, cider brandy largely took the place of flip. MapIvE Sugar. The Indians appear to have learned the art of making syrup from the sap of the maple. As soon as 134 they obtained kettles by barter with the whites they made sugar in considerable quantities, though of an inferior quality. They had manufactured it as early as 1750. It was made by the Chestnut Plain settlers ever after they became established, though at first in small quantities. Before the Revolution some families depended on it for their year's supply and, in 1784 or '85, it became to some extent an article of trade. The price at first was 6d per pound. Maple sugar was made by most of the farmers living in the central and west parts of the town from a very early period. In the east part of Whately the maple was the soft or white maple and the sap flowing from this variety has but little saccharine matter in it. Early in the history of Hatfield large quantities of sugar were made on Mt. Esther, as well as other localities in Whately. The name of Easter is the way that old people called Esther, and that hill is still more often spoken of as Easter than any other way. It gets its name from some one of the Hatfield dames who not only had a dairy house, but a sugar camp on that natural home of the sugar maple. It was fertile and pro- duced a rich supply of succulent food for the cows, and so the cows were driven to Easter, and the dairying was done near where the cows procured their food. But who the Easter or Esther was I do not know. A dairy house was built by Salmon Dickinson, about 1745 to '50, on the lot owned by him adjoining a piece of woodland in the White pasture. This was about forty rods west of Chest- nut Plain road and the land is now owned by Robert Dickinson. This was used in the spring for the making of maple sugar and later in the season for dairy purposes. A daughter of Salmon Dickinson, Mary, married Samuel Dickinson who built where Samuel and Horace Dickinson lived so long, now owned by Rob- ert Dickinson. I have heard of others, but only know cer- tainly of one. John Crafts built a dairy and sugarhouse on Easter about the time of the siege of Boston. He bought a number of cows with the view of taking them near to Boston and supplying the soldiers with milk, but the evacuation of Boston by the British and the removal of the army to near New York spoiled his plans, so he built the dairy and sugarhouse as mentioned above. His sister, Martha, did the work there several summers and I have often heard her relate many incidents of her life there. 135 Among them that the pigeons were so abundant that when she fired a gun at them one time, just as they flew up in a huddle, she gathered up twenty-eight either dead or more or less disabled . ^ CHAPTER VIII. THE TOWN INCORPORATED. Before the town of Whately was incorporated, the town of Hatfield, at a meeting held 23 May, 1770, passed the follow- ing vote : "Voted to set off the town or district to be made from the north part of Hatfield, on petition of the northern inhabitants." Then follows the boundary lines of the new town as given in the act of incorporation. Recorded in Hampshijre Registry, book 67, pages 474-475- From this it will be seen that the vote was taken nearly a year before the incorporation, showing that the subject had been agitated and the terms of the division agreed upon, includ- ing the rather sharp operation of so carefully arranging the line as to throw the expense of maintaining the bridge over the west brook on Chestnut Plain road. In this chapter it is proper to give in full the Act of Incor- poration, as copied from the original parchment, and to insert copies of letters, showing the origin of the name adopted, as well as other ofiicial documents of permanent value and inter- est. All these papers are copied from originals in the ofiSce of the Secretary of the Commonwealth. Anno Regni Regis Georgii Tertii Undesimo. An Act for erecting the northerly part of the town of Hat- field, in the County of Hampshire, into a town by the name of Whately. Whereas the inhabitants of the northerly part of the town 137 of Hatfield, in the County of Hampsliire, have made application to this Court, that the northerly part of said town may be incor- porated into a distinct and separate Town, Be it enacted by the Governor, Council and House of Rep- resentatives, That the northerly part of the said town of Hatfield, which is contained within the lines and limits following. That is to say. Beginning at the northeast corner of the General Field, there called the North Meadow and Farms, thence in the north line of the: said General Field to the northwest corner thereof, from the said northwest corner of that Field the said line to run in a direct course to the southeast corner of the Mill Swamp, which belongs to Moses Dickinson, thence in the south line of the said Mill Swamp to the southwest corner thereof, adjoining there to the east side of that way called the Chestnut Plain road, thence south on the east side of the said way to a point where a line at right angles with the east line of said way and one rod south of the bridge there, called the West brook bridge would intersect the aforesaid east line of the said way ; from the said point of intersection to continue such right angular line as aforesaid to the west side of the said way ; thence to the northeast corner of the lot laid out to Samuel Kellog in the Third Division of Com- mons ; thence west in the north line of the said lot to a point at which a line parallel to and half a mile distant from the east lipe of the Three Mile Additional Grant, so called, would intersect the said north line of the lot last mentioned ; thence in such parallel line last mentioned to the District of Con- way ; thence in the line dividing between Hatfield and the town of Deerfield and District of Conway to the Connecticut River ; thence on the west side of the said River to the station first mentioned; be, and hereby is, erected into a separate Town by the name of Whately : And that the inhabitants of the said town be, and are hereby invested with all the powers, privileges, and immunities that towns in this Province enjoy by law, that of sending a Representative to the General Court only excepted : And that the said town of Whately shall have full right and liberty from time to time, to join with the town of Hatfield in the choice of Representative, to be chosen of the towns of Hatfield or the said town of W^hately indifferently, to represent them in the General Assembly : And that the said town of Whately shall from time to time bear their proportion 138 of tlie expense of such Repres'entatives with the said town of Hatfield, according to their respective proportion of the Prov- ince tax : And the freeholders and other inhabitants of the said town of Whately shall be notified of the time and place of elec- tion, by a warrant from the selectmen of Hatfield directed to the constable or constables of the said town of Whately, requiring such constable or constables to warn the freeholders and other inhabitants of the said Whately qualified to vote in the choice of a Representative, to meet at the time and place of election, which warrant shall be returned by such constable or constables, with certificate of his or their doings thereon, to the selectmen of the town of Hatfield, before the time for holding every such meeting. Provided nevertheless, and be it enacted. That the inhabi- tants of the said town of Whately shall pay their proportion of such Province, County and Town Taxes as already set on them by the town of Hatfield, in like manner as though this Act had not been made ; and the constables chosen by the town of Hatfield, at their annual meeting in March, anno domini one thousand seven hundred and seventy, are hereby fully author- ized and impowered to levy and collect all such taxes assessed upon the inhabitants and lands in the said town of Whately, and are directed to pay in the same in the same manner they would and ought by law to have done, had not this Act been made. Provided nevertheless, and be it further enacted, TJbat the treasurer of the town of Hatfield be, and he is hereby impow- ered and directed to pay the town treasurer of the said town of Whately, and for the use of the said town, such a proportion of the sum of Thirty Pounds, which was raised by the town of Hatfield at their meeting on the first Monday in December last, ■ for providing Preaching in the said town of Hatfield in the year then next ensuing, as has been assessed upon the inhabitants and lands within the limits of the said town of Whately, agree- able to the I/ist last taken by the assessors of Hatfield ; and the treasurer of the said town of Whately is hereby fully authorized and impowered to demand and receive of the treasurer of Hat- field such proportion of the said Thirty Pounds as aforesaid. And be it further enacted. That William Williams, Esq., be, and hereby is impowered and directed to issue his warrant to some principal inhabitant of the said town of Whately, requir- ing him to warn the inhabitants of the said Whately, qualified 139 as hereinafter mentioned, to meet at some suitable time and place in said town, to choose such officers as towns in this Prov- ince are impowered and enjoined by law to choose in the month of March annually, which they are hereby impowered to choose at such meeting. And be it further enacted, That the inhabitants of the said town of Whately, who "in the last tax in the town of Hatfield were rated one-half part so much for their Estates and Faculties as for a single Poll, shall be allowed to vote in their first meet- ing, and such other meetings as may be called in the said town of Whately, until a valuation of Estates shall be,made by assess- ors there. And be it further enacted. That no person happening to reside or be within the limits of the said town of Whately, at the end of the present session of this Court, who would not then have become an inhabitant of Hatfield had not this Act been made, shall become an inhabitant of the said town of Whately, or have legal claim or right to any of the privileges of an inhab- itant there, anything herein before contained to the contrary notwithstanding . And the said town of Whately shall be, and hereby is fully impowered to proceed with all such persons residing there, vvho at the end of the said present session of this Court, would not have been inhabitants of Hatfield, in the same manner the town of Hatfield then, or at any time before, might have proceeded with them touching their removal. Consented to by the Gov- ernor, April 24, [as appears from the Journal, not actually signed till April 26], 1771. Thomas Sanderkon, Justin Morton and Ebenezer Barnard asked consent of the town, i Dec, 1806, to be set off to Whately, giving the bounds. The town refused its consent. The peti- tioners, failing in that, applied to the General Court and in Jan., 1808, the Legislature ordered notice to be served on Deerfield and Whately. Deerfield held a town meeting and chose a commit- tee of three to oppose the petition. The petitioners sent another petition, dated May 8, 1809. Again Deerfield opposed it, and again was an order of notice served on both towns. Deerfield chose another committee of three of her most influential citizens to oppose the annexation to Whately, but the state granted the prayer of the exultant petitioners and, 5 March, 1816, the deed was done, though bitterly opposed by Deerfield. 146 An Act to set off Thomas Sanderson and others from Deerfield and annex them to Whately. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by authority of the same, That from and after the passage of this Act, Thomas Sanderson, Rbenezer Barnard and Justin Morton, with their polls and estates, together with the lands and the inhabitants thereon, within the limits hereafter described — that is to say. Beginning at the southwest corner of Thomas Sanderson's land in the north line of Whately, thence running northerly on a line parallel with the original east line of Conway to the north line of Lot Num- ber Sixteen in Long hill, west Division, so called, thence run- ning eastwardly on the north line of said Lot No."i6 to the east end of Justin Morton's land, thence southerly on the east line of Justin Morton's land, to the south Line ofWilliam Tryon's land, thence eastwardly on the south line of William Tryon's land, to the east side of the County road leading from Deerfield to Whately, thence southwardly on the east line of said County road, to the north line of Whately, including all lands within the said running line and the north line of Whately, be," and they hereby are set off from the town of Deerfield, and annexed to the town of Whately. Passed 5 March, 1810. The sixteen Deerfield lots, contained in the section annexed to Whately in March, 18 10, were as follows: No. I Nathaniel Shurtliff, 12% rods wide. No. 2 Samuel Hinsdale, 18 rods wide. No. 3 Thomas Root, 5K rods wide. No. 4 Joseph Selden, igji rods wide. No. 5 William Barnard, 21 rods wide. No.^ 6 John Hinsdale, 12 rods wide. No. 7 Thomas Selden, 4J^ rods wide. No. 8 Thomas Allison, 15 rods wide. No. 9 Joshua Catlin, ig% rods wide. No. 10 Zacharia Field, i9>^ rods wide. No. II Joseph Brown, iSj4 rods wide. No. 12 Richard Weller, 9 rods wide. No. 13 Thomas Hunt, 6 rods wide. No. 14 David Belding, 15 rods wide. No; 15 John Broughton, ioj4 rods 'syide. No. 16 Benjamin Barrett, 15 rods wide. 216 The above lots are in what is known as Long hill division and the names are those of the original proprietors, about 1700. 141 The Name of the Town. It is a singular fact that the origin of the name, Whately, has been hitherto wholly un- known. No tradition, or conjecture, has existed in relation to it. The memory of a. single individual, in 1848, furnished the writer with the following hint : Mr. Oliver Graves (born 1761) said, '"I was ten years old when Mr. Salmon White came to our house and read the warrant for the first town meeting. My father asked him why it was called Whately ?" He answered, "It is the name of a man." The inference from this incident, as well as from the absence of any tradition, is, that the name was not suggested by the inhabitants of the territory. An ex- amination of the records and files of the General Court for 1771, renders it pretty certain that no petition for an Act of incorpo- ration, signed by residents, was sent in. The wording of the preamble seems to imply that there was no such petition "Have made application to this Court, ' ' probably through Israel Wil- liams, Esq., the representative from Hatfield for that year. And the original draft of the Act of incorporation discloses the singular fact, that the bill passed through its several read- ings in the lower House, and received the concurrence of the Council, with the name left in blank. The inference is, that the name was not selected by the House of Representatives nor by the Council. And further examination shows that the name was not inserted on the parchment by the engrossing clerk, but was inserted by the Governor) in his customary handwriting when it was presented to him for his ofiBcial signature. This g^ves the clew to the man for whom the town received its name. From letters preserved in the State Archives, it appears that a gentleman by the name of Thomas Whately was at this time connected with the British government ; that he took a special interest in, and was thoroughly conversant with the affairs of the Massachusetts Colony, and was an intimate friend and trusted adviser of Governor Hutchinson. There is hardly room for doubt that the Governor inserted the name Whately in the Act of incorporation, out of compliment to his I/Ondon friend. The letter above alluded to is here inserted, partly for its historic value, as throwing light on the British view of our polit- ical affairs, and partly as a memorial of a man of whom nothing has hitherto been known by us, and in whom every citizen of the town must feel a personal interest ; London, nth February, 1769. Sir: — I have deferred answering your favors of 17 October Hi and ro December till the consideration of American affairs was over : .1 am sorry to say how little has been done ; I am afraid no more is intended. I will therefore give you a full, tho' I doubt not a satisfactory account of our proceedings, as I appre- hend for ye winter. The manner in which Mr. Danforth's petition was received appears in the votes of 23 January. The manner in which it had been obtained was known to ye Ministry, and stated to the House; but their great desire to admit some American petition induced them to receive it, entering it only as a petition of indi- viduals, not of the Council ; to some, however, the implied assertion of the Right, was an insuperable objection ; the Minis- ters overlooked' it, and yet the next day insi.^ited on rejecting a petition of Mr. Bollan, tho' perfectly innocent, and tho' because it was so, Mr. Grenville with many more . strongly pressed to have it received. These were all the material events previous to the consider- ation of the Rosolution and Address sent down by the IvOrds. The Commons have agreed to them, with some amendments in point of accuracy. I cannot pretend to state to you all that pa,ssed in two days' debate upon them ; tho' inefficacy and the locality of the plan proposed were much insisted on; I^ord Rockinham's and lyord Shelburne's friends objected to the whole ; Mr. Grenville, tho' he ridiculed and disapproved of such plan for such a crisis as much as any body, and particularly urged the absurdity of exasperating a deluded people with angry words, while the Tameness of the measure would encourage them, yet as the facts had been stated by the I/Ords, he would not, by a negative to the Resolutions, give any reason to sup- pose that he countenanced the transactions therein condemned : nor, on the other hand, by assenting to the Address, shew any approbation of a measures so inadequate to the occasion. You, will easily see what must have been suggested on these topics. I will not trouble you with arguments which so obviously occur, but confine myself to what was said on the Statute of Henry the Eighth. They who oppose the whole plan, generally not uni- versally, disputed the application of the Act to the Colonies : it was passed before they existed : the Title and the preamble pre- vent such an application, unless upon admission that ye Colonies are not within the King's dominions. Some doubted whether it was an existing law, but that point was given up. Mr. Gren- ville declared that he, upon the words of the preamble and title had been inclined to think the Statute not applicable, and won- dered the Ministers had not rather rested on the Statute of Edward the Sixth, which was less doubtful ; but said that the precedents and authorities cited by the Attorney General had convinced him that the Act did extend to ^ every part of the King's dominions. Those authorities were many. InO'rooke's Case, reported in Anderson, the twelve Judges were unanimously of opinion that the Act extended to treasons committed in Ire- 143 land, tho' there is a separate parliament, and every species of Jurisdiction for constituting and trying any offences. Lord Hale in many passages maintains that treasons committed in Ireland and Guernsey and in the Remains of the Duchy of Normandy are triable under that Statute in England : Even a Peer of Ire- land, the' amenable there only before the House of Lords, may be and often has been tried here by a common Jury. At the latter end of Queen Anne's reign, one Kirby was bro't from Antigua to be tried on that statute here, for a treason commited there. The proceeding was on an opinion of Northey, Attorney General, and Raymond, Solicitor General, and passed ye Coun- cil, when Lord Chancellor Harcourt and Lord Chancellor J. Parker, afterwards Lord Chancellor Macclesfield, were present ; he was indicted and pleaded, as appears from ye Record of King's Bench, but afterwards broke prison. Not one Lawyer in the House supported a doctrine contrary to such authorities : As I cite them from memory, you will pardon any little inaccu- racies : In ye material points I am exact, and I thought yoti would wish to be furnished with them as, after debate upon the subject here, I conclude it will be a matter of controversy with you. I do not hear of any design to bring in a bill to explain or amend ye Mutiny Act, though I have not been wanting to sig- nify thro' proper channels ye difficulties which you have in- formed me occur in ye execution of it : but perhaps they stay till further experience has shown' ye whole extent of what may be necessary to alter. I fear all parliamentary proceedings rela- tive to America are at an end for the present, and that this, with the long letter I wrote you on the 14 Nov. is the whole history of ye session. As to ye Ministerial measures, tho' when Parlia- ment was called upon to approve of them ye Ministers were in return called upon to declare, whether they meant to abide by them, especially ye suspension of ye Assemblies, no answer could be obtained, but there has not appeared the least idea of withdrawing ye Troops from Boston, nor will the last Revenue Law be repealed, or I believe altered, whilst the right to impose duties is questioned. The opinion without doors on the claims of the Colonies, and the behaviour of ye Bostonians seem to me the same as they have been for some time past, and the concur- rence of ye other Colonies in the Principles of Boston only con- firm those opinions. I have the honour to be, with great respect, Your most obe- dient, humble serv. , THOMAS WHATELY. To The H0NORABI.E Lieut. Gov. Hutchinson. Since these pages were prepared for the press, the following letter has been discovered among some old papers in the State Department. It explains itself: 144 Boston, 14 May, 1771. Dr. Sir: — Permit me to congratulate you upon the Honour done you in your late appointment. It is what I have long wished for, and I hope the junction of so many of Mr. Gren- ville's friends will strengthen Government and render the pres- ent Administration of long continuance. A durable Ministry, and a few examples in England of punishment for the seditious principles and practices so prevalent there, would discourage the disturbers of the peace here. They triumph when their cor- respondents write that you are in danger of a great convulsion : as soon as their hopes of it are over, they are depressed and hide their heads. Among the Acts passed in the late session of the General Court, you will see one for incorporating a Township by the name of Whately. This is but a poor mark of respect. I wish it may be in my power to give you further proof of my being, with very great regard and esteem, Sir, Your most humble and most obedient servant, T. HUTCHINSON. Thomas Whatei^y. There is a natural desire to know who lived in Whately, who owned houses here, and what were their pecuniary circum- stances when the town, first started. And as a full, accurate and reliable account of the condition of affairs at this date, the following I/ist of the Polls and Estates of the inhabitants of the Town is here subjoined. Though the month is not given, it was evidently made out in May, 1 77 1 . It will be seen that some early settlers are not included in the list. Lieut. Ebenezer Bardwell was at this date a resident of Deerfield. Adonijah Taylor and Gideon Dickinson were living north of the line, in what was afterwards annexed to the town from Deerfield. Noah Wells had probably removed, temporarily, to the Equivalent Lands, afterwards Hawley. Joel Dickinson had removed to Conway. Capt. Lucius Allis had removed to Conway. 145 Polls and Estates, Whately, 1:771. Polls •Hru'L"^H<''«««-C"WS. Oxen Bushels No. acre Grain. Tillage La Daniel Morton 2 I I 3 2 159 12 Oliver Graves 2 I I 2 2 130 '3 David Graves i I 2 2 80 12 Elisha Belding 1 r 2 60 II' John Crafts i 2 15 3 Joseph Crafts i I 15 3 Israel Graves i I 1 2 2 33 5'A Simeon Wait 2 I 2 4 2 200 20 Henry Stiles i I I 2 64 4 Oliver Morton i I I 2 4 85 8J^ Benj. Smith, Jr. i I I 48 8 Moses Crafts i 3 sheep Peter Train i I I 2 2 45 5 Edward Brown 3 I 3 6 2 26 4 Abraham Turner 2 3 2 24 4 Benoni Crafts i I I 2 I 35 5 Paul Belden i I I 2 2 24 3 Ezra Turner i 2 16 2 Hosea Curtis i 2 Joseph Kellogg i Joseph Belding, Jr. i 3 2 150 23 Nathaniel Sartle 1 2 60 12 Thomas Sanderson 2 3 2 164, 24 Nathaniel Coleman . i Abel Parker i I 2 1^0 20 Jonathan Smith ' 2 2 2 39 6 Elisha Frary i 3 2 30 5 . I^emuel Wells i 2 John Wait 2 I I 132 22 Joseph Scott 3 I 84 14 Seth Wait i 3 4 140 20 Thomas Crafts i 2 2 80 8 Philip Smith i 2 86 16 David Scott . 3 2 4 88 II Noah Bardwell i 4 4 48 6 Paul Smith i I 32 4 Nathan Graves 2 a 2 56 8 Wid. Lois Parker i 3 4 35 7 John Wait. Jr. i 2 I 21 3 Joshua Beldin i I I 3 140 20 146 Polls P'w'l'ng Horses Cowa Oicpn Bushels No. acres rous. Houses. *i<"^se8. t.owa. uxen. Q,.ain. Tillage Land. Benjamin Seott 2 2 3 140 23 Benj. Scott, Jr. I 112 1 19 17 Elisha Smith 2 I 2 80 10 Martin Graves I I 71 10 Salmon White I 3 2 88 II Perez Bardwell 2 I 56 8 Samuel Carley I Benjamin Smith I I 66 II Thomas Allen I 12 2 William Kellog I John Graves Elihu Graves David Scott, Jr. I NON-RESIDKNTS. Elisha Allis I 40 5 Nathaniel Hawkes I Acres English Mowing Acres Pasturage i Acres English Mowing Acres' Pasturage Daniel Morton [2 20 Jona. Smith 6 7 Oliver Graves 6 12 Elisha Frary 7 12 David Graves 3 5 Moses Frary 6 Elisha Belding 2 4 John Wait 7 2 John Crafts 10 Joseph Scott 2 5 Israel Graves 4 26 Seth Wait 6 16 Simeon Wait 13 20 Thomas Crafts 9 8 Henry Stiles 6 8 Philip Smith 6 6 Oliver Morton II 25 David Scott 18 12 Benj. Smith, Jr. 9 Noah Bardwell 6 30 Peter Train 6 20 Paul Smith 3 20 Edward Brown 6 20 Benj. Scott 7 Abraham l^urner 16 4 Elisha Smith 3 Benoni Crafts 6 7 Martin Graves 5 3 Paul Belding 6 12 Salmon White II 18 Ezra Turner I iJ^ Perez Bardwell 20 8 Hosea Curtis 6 John Graves 30 Jos. Belding, Jr. 10 10 David Scott, Jr 6 Nathaniel Sartle 4>^ Nathan Graves II 18 Thos. Sanderson 9 3 Wid. Ivois Parker 6 3 Abel Parker 4 ID Joshua Beldin 10 30 147 Acres NON-RESID TS Bnglisli, Mowing Acres Pasturage Acres a~,.c9 So^^ifgratS^go Elisha Allis 20 60 Eliakim Field 14 Nathaniel Hawks 4 Medad Field 10 Reuben Belden 8 Samuel Church 8 Gideon Dickinson 3/. Noah Nash 30 Simeon Morton 72 Elijah Dickinson 16 Noali Coleman 30 Benj. Wait 8 Abner Dickinson 16 Jonathan Morton II Eleazer Frary 2 Moses Wait 4 Daniel Graves II Israel Williams Esq. 30 Sam'l Dickinson 14 30 David Morton 16 Rem'br'ce Bardwell 30 Oba. Dickinson .20 Eleazer Allis 3 Mary Smith 20 Elijah Morton 3 Joseph Smith 6 Joseph Billings 8 Elisha Wait 2 David Billings 8 Benj. Wait, Jr. 9 Jonathan AlUs 28 Moses Frary 6 Four residents were not taxed, viz. : Rev. Rufus Wells, Joseph Sanderson, Sr., Joseph Belden, Sr., Richard Chauncey. Of the non-residents, Eleazer Frary had 6 acres of tillage land and raised 48 bushels of grain; Daniel Graves had s}i acres and 38 bushels ; Obadiah Dickinson had 7 acres and 42 bushels ; Mary Smith had 10 acres and 90 bushels; Benjamin Wait, Jr., had 3 acres and 2 1 bushels. Edward Brown had a sawmill ; Reuben Belden, a sawmill and gristmill; Paul Belden had a tan house. ■ Summary. Number of Polls, ratable 71 Number of Polls, not ratable 4 Number of dwelling houses 40 Number of tan houses i Number of horses 45 Number of cows 99 Number of oxen 64 Number of sheep 375 Number of swine, over three months old 56 Number of bushels of grain raised 3495 Number of barrels of cider made 1 7 Number of tons of English hay 182J4 Number of sawmills, 2 ; gristmills, i 3 Number of non-resident land owners 32 148 Though a little out of their proper places yet, for the sake of ready comparison, the following certificate and assessors re- turn are inserted here : This may certify that the number of males from sixteen years old and upwards iri the town of Whately is one hundred and six (106) white persons and two (2) negroes. JOSEPH BELDING, ) Selectmen JOHN smiTh, y of OLIVER GRAVES, ) Whately. Whately, Jan. '20, 1777. VAIvUATION OF ESTATES AND POLLS IN WHATELY, AS ESTAB- LISHED BY THE GENERAL COURT, I786. Number of Polls, ratable i35 Number of Polls, not ratable 6 Number of dwelling houses 68 Number of tan hoiise ' i Number of gristmill — Samuel Belden i Number of sawmills 2)4 Number of barns 45 Number of young neat cattle 177 Number of horses — 3 years old and upwards . 95 . Number of oxen 88 Number of cows — 3 years pld and upwards 171 Number of sheep .. 264. Number of swine — over three months old 149 Number of barrels of cider 96 Number of acres of tillage land 619^^ Number of acres of English mowing 220 Number of acres of fresh meadow 256 Number of acres of pasture land i6o8j4 Number of acres of woodland 161 Number of acres unimproved land 5325 Number of acres of unimprovable land 953 Stock in Trade £ 57 The first meeting for the election of town ofiicers was held at the house of Daniel Morton, innholder, May 6,1771. The ofiicers chosen were as follows : Salmon White, town clerk and treasurer; Joseph Belding, Jr., and Henry Stiles, constables ; John Wait, Simeon Wait, Edward Brown, Salmon White and I'hilip Smith, selectmen ; Edward Brown, Philip Smith and Sal- mon White, assessors ; Thomas Crafts, sealer of weights and 149 measures; Thomas Sanderson, sealer of leather; Peter Train, Oliver Graves and Benj. Smith, surveyors of highways; Israel Graves, Noaih Bardwell and John Wait, Jr., fence viewers ; Benj. Scott, Jr., John Brown and Joseph Crafts, field drivers; Elisha Belding and Noah Bardwell, tythingmen; Benj. Smith, Perez Bardwell and Abraham Turner, wardens ; John Crafts, Martin Graves and Elisha Frary, deer reeves ; Thomas Crafts, surveyor of shingles; Peter Train, Gad Smith and Lemuel Wells, hog- reeves. The leading interests of the town will be treated in sepa- rate chapters, but some votes, characteristic of the times, which were passed at the earlier meetings, are here copied ; Voted, To build a pound forty feet square. Voted, That the Selectmen provide a Law book and a Record book. Voted, To provide a grave cloth for the use of the town. Voted, That David Scott and Joseph Scott be a Committee to provide two biers for the use of the town. Voted, That hogs may run at large from May i to October 15, being properly yoked and rung. Voted, To let two milch cows to a family run on the Commons. It will be seen that the last section of the Act of Incorporation provided that the town shall have full power "To proceed with" persons "Touching their removal." This provision shows the extreme care taken by our fathers to guard the rights and priv- ileges of citizenship. They wanted in every citizen moral worth and habits of industry and economy, and a purpose of permanent settlement. Hence the custom prevailed generally throughout the Province of "Warning out of town" all transient persons, all who did not purchase real estate and all strangers not vouched for by some inhabitant. And when a stranger came into town to reside the person into whose family or tene- ment he came was required to give notice to the Selectmen of the name of the person, or persons, the place from which he came, his pecuniary circumstances and the date of his coming to town. The authorities would then, at their discretion, allow him to remain or order him to be "Warned and cautioned as the law directs." A person so warned was prevented from gaining a settlement and the town escaped liability for his support. In several instances this town availed itself of the right in question as the following warrant will show : ISO Hampshire, ss. To either of the constables of the town of Whately, in said county, Greeting: In the name of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, you are directed to warn Sam- uel Brass and Sabra Andross, transient persons, lately come into this town for the purpose of abiding therein, not having the town's consent therefor, that they depart the limits thereof with their children and others under their care, within fifteen days, and make due return of your doings to the clerk of the town. Signed by the Selectmen. The names of others, "warned" at different times are: Robert Durfy, Jonathan Bacon, John I,amson, Benjamin Bacon, Jonathan Clark, Zebina Lyon, Enoch Bird, Noah Coleman, William Brown, William Brown, Jr., Elisha Frary, Jr., Josiah Brown, Nathaniel Coleman, Isaac Frary, Thomas Castwell. , Some of these became permanent residents and were among our best citizens. Rev. Rufus Wells. CHAPTER IX. ECCLESIASTICAL HISTORY. In anticipation of a town organization steps had, been taken to secure regular Sabbath ordinances. In the February preced- ing, David Scott, acting in behalf of the others, had engaged Rufus Wells of Deerfield, to preach, and he had supplied them from March 6 to April 28. The first entry in Mr. Wells' account book gives the full history of this preliminary transac- tion: 1771. David Scott Dr. Mar. 6 to Apr. 28. To preaching to the people in Whately eight Sabbaths, by your engagement, on whom my demand is, and not ye said people ;C^ o o 1 77 1. Contra Cr. April 29. By cash received of Mr. Brown ;^o 6 .0 May 15. By cash received of Daniel Morton 060 May 17. By cash received of EUsha Frary 050 Junes. By cash received of yourself 250 July 9. By cash received of Joseph Belding, Jr. 0130 Oct. 25. By cash received of Thomas Crafts 06a Dec. Z3. By cash received of Peter Train 054 Jan. 22. By cash received of Benoni Crafts 050 Apr. 7. By cash received of Salmon White 060 June 22. By cash received of Elisha Belding 040 May and June. By yourself making plow, 6s — Work hewing and framing my house to balance 218 8 /8 o o At a meeting held, probably by adjournment. May 9th, 152 three days after the formal organization of the town, it was voted, " To raise thirty pounds for preaching." June 4, 1771, the town voted to hire Rufus Wells of Deerfield to preach six weeks upon probation. Simeon Wait, John Wait and Philip Smith were chosen a committee to engage him. The same committee were instructed to provide a place for him to board This committee attended to the duty and engaged board at Dan- iel Morton's. At the expiration of the six weeks' probation, the town voted to give Mr, Wells a call to settle there in the Gospel min- istry. The conditions offered were as follows: A "settle- ment," as it was termed, of one hundred and thirty-three pounds, six shillings and eight pence ; a salary of fifty-five pounds for the first year ; and to raise forty shillings yearly till it amount to seventy-five pounds. It was also voted, that Mr. Wells be allowed six pounds yearly tor wood, to take place at such time as he sets up housekeeping. The committee to make these pro- posals to Mr. Wells were Nathan Graves, Daniel Morton and Salmon White. A pound as then reckoned was equal to three dollars, thirty- three and a third c^nts. Hence the "settlement" would amount to $45o,and the full salary, including the allowance for wood, to $270 per year. This sum sounds small compared with minis- ters' salaries at the present day, but it is to be considered that money is valuable according as it procures the necessaries of life. Taking the price of wheat as a standard $270 then was equal to about $360 now; with the wages of labor for a standard, which is probably more just, the $270 was equal to $550 at the present time ; taking the price of land as the standard, $270 then equal to $2,000 now. The settlement was paid in land, the town making over to Mr. Wells the lot lying east of the old parsonage, extending from land of Calvin Wells on the north to land of J. P Dickin- son on the south and containing nearly sixty acres. After giving Mr. Wells a call (as above) the town, it appears, applied to some of the neighboring ministers for advice' in the case and received an answer as follows : Whereas the inhabitants of Whately have applied to us for our advice respecting the settlement of Mr. Rufus Wells in the work of the ministry among them; we -hereby signify that we well approve of their choice of the said Mr. Rufus Wells, and do freely advise to his settlement in the ministry in, said \ 153 Whately ; provided no sufficient obstacle shall appear in the way of his settlement there. JOSEPH ASHLEY. JONATHAN ASHLEY. JOHN EMERSON. August ye 2d, 1771. Formation of a church. As preliminary to the forma- tion of the church, at a town meeting held. 13 August, 1771, it was voted "That Wednesday the '21st day of this August be kept as a day of Fasting and Prayer by ye inhabitants of ye town of Whately. ' ' Voted, That Messrs. David Parsons of Amherst, Joseph Ashley of Sunderland, Jonathan Ashley of Deerfield, Samuel Hopkins of Hadley and John Emerson of Conway, V. D. M., be the persons to perform the services of the day of Fasting. August 21, 1771. On this day of Fasting and Prayer, (writes Mr. Wells in his Church Records) there being present on the occasion, Rev. Messrs. Parsons, Jona. Ashley, Hopkins and Emerson, after the public services of the day were finished, the members in full communion in Whately were embodied into a church, being recommended by the church of Christ in Hat- field, to which church by far the greatest part that were embod- ied did belong,- and had communed there in all the ordinances of the Gospel. The Certificate of recommendation, above alluded to, was in the following' words : These may certify, that the within-mentioned persons are members of the church of Christ in Hatfield, in regular stand- ing ; and as such are recommended to be embodied in a church state among themselves. By vote of the Ch. OBA. DICKINSON. Hatfield, August 19, 1771. One of the preliminary requisites for organizing and incor- porating a town in the early days was the fact that an Orthodox church had been formed and a learned minister procured, and these statements were properly set forth in the petition to the Great and General Court as an argument, or a fact, showing the fitness of that locality to assume the municipal functions. And Whately, desiring to be in the prevailing fashion, took steps to secure regular Sabbath services. For this purpose a 154 subscription paper was drawn up and signed by Edward Brown, Daniel Morton, Sr., Elisha Frary, David Scott, Joseph Belden, Jr., Thomas Crafts, Peter Train, Benoni Crafts, Capt. Salmon White and Elisha Belding, giving in all £8, 6 March, 1771. They employed Rufus Wells to preach for them. He was a recent graduate from his theological studies, and he preached for them six Sabbaths, to April 28th. The town was organized and town officers elected 6 May, 177 1. At a meeting adjourned from May 6th to May 9th, the town voted to raise thirty pounds for preaching and, 4 June. 1771, the town voted to hire Rufus Wells to preach six weeks on trial. At the end of the six weeks the town voted, "To give Mr. Rufus Wells a call to settle in the Gospel ministry with us." The conditions were a "settlement," as it was termed, of ;^I33, 6s and 8d, probably paid in land, and a salary of ;^55 for the first year, and to raise it 40s yearly until it amounted to ^75. It was also voted, "To a^low him /^6 more per annum for wood, to take place at such time as he should set up house- keeping." A pound was reckoned as equal to $3,335^. The land was on the east side of Chestnut Plain St., and was com- posed of lots 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 and 28, in the second division of Commons. He also had a lot on the west side of the road, in the fourth division. The lots on the east side extended to the Claverack road, one-half mile. It is evident that he commenced preparation to build, as Dea. Sanderson, in 1772, charges him with labor of himself and his two brothers, John and Asa, for digging the cellar and a team for drawing stone for the cellar, in all eighteen days, as per book of Dea. Thomas Sanderson. The next thing done was the formation of a church. To make this more impressive, the town held a meeting 13 August, 1771, when it was voted, "That Wednesday, the 21st of August, be kept as a day of fasting and prayer by ye inhabitants of ye town of Whately," and the town voted to invite five clergymen from the neighboring towns to assist in the exercises of the day. During the day, after the public services were over, the mem- bers in full communion, as certified to by the clerk of the Hat- field church, were embodied as a church. The names of the members were as follows : David Graves, Sr., Joseph Belden, Sr., Salmon White, Simeon Waite, John Waite, Richard Chauncey, Nathan Graves, David Scott, Thomas Crsfts, Daniel Morton, Israel Graves, Sr., Benjamin Smith, Philip Smith, Elisha Frary, Joshua Belden, Elisha Bel- 155 ding, John Waite, Jr., David Graves, Jr., and Oliver Graves, Sr., nineteen in all. There also should be added the names of the following ladies : Elizabeth Bardwell, wife of I/ieut. Ebe- nezer; Elizabeth BeWen, wife of Paul; Martha Waite, wife of Dea. Simeon; Submit Scott, wife of David; Abigail Smith, daughter of Elisha ; Eunice Graved, wife of Israel; Mary White, wife of Capt. Salmon ; Ruth Belding, wife of Dea. Elisha; Mary Waite, wife of John, Sr.; Abigail Crafts, wife of Benoni; Lydia Stiles, mother of Capt. Henry; Ruth Stiles, wife of Capt. Henry ; Sarah Smith, wife of Elisha ; Sarah Smith, daughter of Elisha; Abigail Graves, wife of David, Sr. ; Jemima Scott, wife of Benjamin, Sr. ; Abigail Scott, wife of Benjamin, Jr. ; Anna Belden, wife of Joshua; Margaret Belden, wife of Joseph; Sarah Wells, wife of Thomas of Deerfield; Eleanor Morton, (2) wife of Daniel; Miriam Frary, wife of Lieut. Elisha; Elizabeth Chaun- cey, wife of Richard; Abigail Smith, wife of Jonathan; Rebecca Graves, wife of Dea. Oliver, twenty-five in all ; and George ^ratt, a slave to Mr. Chauncey. He died 18. Sept., 1794, aged 75 years. The neict step was the ordination of Mr. Wells. A council of thirteen members was invited from neighboring towns. Capt. Salmon White was agreed with to provide for and entertain the council which probably convened at his house, some three- fourths of a mile from the center, where the services of ordina- tion were held. The council met and Mr. Wells was "Set apart to the work of the ministry, being made an overseer of the church, or flock of Christ, in Whately, by the laying on of the hands of the Presbytery," 25 Sept., 1771. The services were held under the shade of two large oak trees standing on the west side of Chestnut Plain St., just south of the present resi- dence of C. R. Chaffee. A stage was built for the ministers and the congregation was seated in front on temporary seats. This was a proud day for our young town and, doubtless, for the young minister now empowered to perform all the acts custo- mary for the ministerial order. The halfway membership then prevailed of admitting per- sons of fair character to the church far enough to have their children baptized, but were not allowed to partake of the em- blems of Christ's body and blood until they became members in full communion by confessing Christ or, as they expressed it, "Persons to come to full communion shall be. of competent knowledge, in the opinion of the pastor ; that they publicly pro- 156 fess their faith and consent to the church covenant." This con- tinued until i8 March, 1816. Brother Joel Waite (a rumseller, by the way) stated that it was a matter of grief and an offence to him that' this church admitted persons to the privilege of bap- tism for their children by consenting to the covenant, and yet neglected to attend upon the' sacrament of the Lord's supper, when he conceived that this practice was not countenanced by the word of God. After due consideration the question was put and the .heretofore practice was condemned by a unanimous vote. Then the pastor closed the meeting with solemn prayer: To go back now to the early days when was commenced the effort to build a church or meeting-house. And now we will allow Mr. Temple to tell the story. Of course, he has to omit much of the strife, the wrangling and the heartburnings of this people, of which I have heard so much. The Meeting-house. At the time of the organization of the church and settlement of Rev. Mr. Wells no meeting-house had been built. The people first met for religious worship in the dwelling house of Oliver Morton. The meetings were held here for perhaps two years. December 2, 1771, the town voted, "To allow Oliver Morton three pounds for his house to meet in for the term of one year." March 6, 1774, voted, "To pay Mr. Morton one pound, ten shillings for the use of his house six months." Meetings for public worship were also held for a time, perhaps a year, at the house of Rev. Mr. Wells, the town, as compensation, agreeing to assist him in finishing his house. December 2, 1771, a vote was passed, "To make provision for a meeting-house." A committee, consisting of David Scott, Thomas Crafts, Joseph Belding, Jr., Noah Bardwell and David Graves, Jr., was appointed at the same time to carry out the above vote. At a meeting a few weeks later the town instructed the above committee to provide four thousand feet of pine boards, clapboards, window frames and sash and timber sufi&cient for said meeting-house. The timber was cut wherever it could be easiest procured. The boards and joists were sawed at the mill of Adonijah Taylor, where Silas Sanderson's mills are now located. The next spring (March 30, 1772,) the town voted, "To provide shingles this present year for the meeting house." These were purcha.sed at about ten shillings per thousand. In the fall of this year (Optober 5, 1772,) it was voted, "That the meeting- house be set up next spring. ' ' It was also voted at the same time "That the meeting-house be placed in the Chestnut Plain streert 157 (so called) at the most convenient place between the dwelling house of Oliver Morton and that of Rufus Wells, V. D. M., in Whately." Salmon White, Edward Brown, Oliver Graves, Joseph Belding, Jr., and David Scott were chosen building committee. The spot they selected was where the meeting- hou.se of the First Parish stood. At the same meeting it was voted to raise eighty pounds to build said meeting-house, the money to be levied by tax on the ratable polls and property of the inhabitants. At a town meeting, held a few months later, it was voted, "To build one porch to the meeting-house," but the vote was never carried into effect. During the winter of 1772-73 the timber and materials were collected and at a meeting, held 10 May, 1773, the town granted additional money and voted that David Scott be master work- man to frame the house. In the course of the two following months the house was framed, raised and partially covered. At a town meeting held 8 July, 1773, it was voted, "To raise forty pounds to go on and finish the meeting-house." The "finish" then put on, however, was not of the highest order, as will be seen in the particular description which follows : On the outside the roof was well shingled, though it had no steeple or tower ; the sides and ends were covered with rough boards, chamfered together. , The windows in the lower story were pretty fully glazed ; those in the upper story were boarded np. There were three doors to the house, one each on the north, east and south sides — that on the east side being reckoned the front door. These were made of rough boards and not very tightly fitted. Thus uniform was the covering upon the outside. The inside had no "finish" at all except a ground floor. The sides were destitute of both plastering and laths, and the frame work of the galleries, the beams, girths and rafters were all naked. A rough board pulpit, raised a few feet, was placed in the centef of the west side. Directly in front of /the pulpit, a carpenter's work- bench was left. The seat which was placed before this bench was claimed by the old ladies, that they might hear better, and have a support for the back. The seats were nothing more than low slab forms ; these were arranged without much regard to order, and were free to all. After some years Mr. Wells nailed up a couple of boards on the left of the pulpit, for the better accommodation of his wife; and a sort of pew or bench, with a back fixed to it, capable of seating six or eight persons, was fit- ted up by a few of the young men, on the east side near the door. 158 The house remained in this state twenty-four or twenty- five years. During this time it was hardly more respectable in appearance or more comfortable than an ordinary single boarded barn. In those days no stoves or fireplaces were found in the meeting-house. The men kept their feet warm by thump- ing them together ; the women carried foot stoves filled with coals from the hearth at home. Families who lived at a dis- tance hired a "noon room" somewhere in the village where they could eat their lunch, get warm and fill their foot stoves with fresh coals. An article was once inserted in the town warrant, ''To see if the town will grant leave to people that live at a dis- tance from meeting, to build a fire in the schoolhouse on Sab- bath noons." Passed in the negative. It is quite probable that some of his good friends were accustomed to make the pastor's kitchen their noon room, and that the genial fire and genial fare were the cause of a little tar- diness in reaching the sanctuary for the afternoon service. Otherwise it is not easy to account for the following vote of the town : Voted, "That the intermission on Sunday be one hour, and that the selectmen be a committee to inform the pastor when to begin the exercises and to be punctual." In winter drifting snows found easy entrance, and in sum- mer the swallows, in great numbers, were accustomed to fly in and build their mud nests on the plates and rafters. On the Sabbath these social little intruders, twittering as merrily as ever, seemed entirely regardless of the people below ; plainly having it for their maxim to mind their own business, however much the minds and eyes of those below might be attracted to themselves. It is said that during the few months of their annual stay Mr. Wells seldom or never exchanged with his brethren of other towns, giving as a reason, that he feared the swallows, to which habit had familiarized him, would be too great an annoyance to strangers. He could say with the Psalm- ist, "The sparrow hath found a house, and the swallow a nest for herself, where she may lay her young, even thine altars, O Lord of Hosts." There were two reasons which prevented the further com- pletion of the meeting-house. The first was the war of the Rev- olution, which broke out soon after the town was incorporated. This for some years absorbed the chief attention of the com- munity, and the taxes levied to support it drained the people of money. The other reason was a division of sentiment about the 159 location of the house. A part demanded that it should be moved half a mile to the southwest, to a spot south of "Spruce Hill," (in the lot owned in 1849 ^Y the Rev. John Ferguson) and a majority insisted that it should remain on the old spot. Many votes were passed and afterwards reconsidered. Many expedients were devised by both parties. Numerous commit- tees, both of the town's people and disinterested men from abroad, were appointed on this question with various results. At the town meeting in March, 1788, a vote was passed and insisted, "To raise seventy pounds to repair the meetingrhouse." This led to the drawing up of the following/ "protest," which was presented to the town at a meeting in April : "We, the subscribers, the people of the westerly part of the town of Whately, whose names are under written, do enter a protest to this meeting, 10 April, 1788, against the proceedings of the other parts of the town, that is, in finishing up the meeting-house in the place where it now stands. For we have been to the cost of having a committee to determine where the just spot for the meeting-house to stand is, who determined in the centre of the town, and there we are willing to finish it up, and nowhere else. "John Smith, Elisha Frary, Phineas Frary, Elihu Waite, Simeon Morton, Edward Brown, Joel Waite, Reuben Graves, John Brown, Moses Munson, John Starks, Bernice Snow, Isaiah Brown, Reuben Taylor, Asa Sanderson, Noah Bardwell." This protest not being heeded, the signers and others with- drew and formed a new society. They afterwards erected a meeting-house on the Poplar Hill road. This was the origin of the Baptist society of Whately. The feelings engendered by this long and, at times, bitter controversy about the location of the meeting-house were not at once subdued. Those who attached themselves to the new organization and paid the expenses incidental to maintaining separate ordinances, claimed that they ought to be released from liability to pay theirproportionof the expenses of the old church. The law was against them, and the majority of the town was against them, and for a series of years they bore the .double .burden. But in 1794 the town voted, "That the treasurer pay to all such persons their ministerial rates, as shall procure proper certificates of their attending on other teachers, and shall profess to diflfer in sentiment from those Christians called Congregationalls," i6o Although the town voted at this date to raise money to repair the meeting-house it does not appear that any funds were actually expended for this purpose till 1797. The seventj' pounds was paid to Mr. Wells for arrearages of his salary. Various moneys were raised in different years for repairs, and then otherwise expended. The town voted, 5 December, 1796, "To raise three hundred pounds for repairing the meeting-house," and appointed a com- mittee to carry out the vote. In January following, twenty pounds additional was granted, and in the spring the work was commenced. In the course of the year 1797 the house was thoroughly repaired The outside was clapboarded and painted, the vacant win- dows of the upper story, which had afforded access to the swal- lows for so many years, were glazed and paneled doors were put in. The inside was also "finished," galleries put up and pews built. The pews were square, enclosed with paneled work, according to the fashion of the times. The pulpit, situated as before, was a plain structure, very high, square corners and pro- jecting center, with a hexagonal sounding-board suspended above. No formal consecration of the house appears to have been made at its first opening in 177.3. But now that it had been made more seemly a day was specially set apart and it was solemnly dedicated to God. Seating the Meeting-House. At the town meeting, held Dec. 4, 1797, it was voted not to sell the pews and, instead, a committee of nine persons was chosen, "To seat the meeting- house," i. e.. to assign to each family the particular pew they were to occupy for a year or longer as the case might be. The principle of "seating," at first adopted, is not known. The practice prevailed in some years of seating by age and some- times by property. At a town meeting, held 19 May, 1800, it was voted, "That in seating people, one year in the age of a person shall be reckoned equal to one dollar on the list." This custom, which prevailed for upwards of twenty years, was the occasion of much strife and many jealousies and heart- burnings. Individuals and families, disliking their seat mates, would sometimes absent themselves entirely from meeting, and, in one instance, an individual made an appeal to the town at a regular meeting of the inhabitants, and a vote was passed assign- ing him a given pew. The pews and internal fixtures erected at this time remained in the same state and fashion till 1843. i6i In the spring of 1819 the town voted, "To sell the pews in the meeting-house," and in this and the following years, a large number of them were sold. Of the avails of this sale of pews, a steeple was built upon the south end of the house and a bell purchased. This was done in 1821-22. The people now for the first time heard the sound of the "church-going bell. In the early days of the town, perhaps till 1795, it was custo- mary to call the people together on the Sabbath, by blowing a conch. (In 1795, it was voted, "That the town will not improve anybody to blow the conch as a signal for meeting." The iden- tical shell is now in possession of Porter Wells.) It was blown once an hour before the time of service, and again as the minis- ter was approaching the house. From 1795 to 1822 no public signal was given, the people assembling at their pleasure. In 1843 the meeting-house was entirely remodeled, but the original frame erected by Master Scott in 1773, being found per- fectly sound, was left unaltered. After the reunion of the First and Second parishes this house was sold and taken down (1867) and the united congre- gation removed to the house built by the Second parish, stand- ing just south of the old parsonage. Statistics. The original number who subscribed and assented to the covenant of the church was forty-three. The number of person admitted to full membership during Rev. Mr. Wells' pastorate, i. e., up to 1822, was, according to the church records, 374. But as many who were received to "covenant privileges" were accustomed to partake of the sacrament some names were unintentionally omitted from the records, and the actual number in communion is believed to be 488. The total number of members received to church fellowship, from 1771 to 187 1 is 740. Rev. Mr. Wells. In accordance with the customs of the times Mr. Wells managed the affairs of a large and productive farm in connection with his ministerial duties. He was emi- nently successful in both callings. His accounts, often quoted from in these pages, filled a large sized folio of 285 pages. He also acted as conveyancer and counselor in drawing up con- tracts, filling deeds and writing wills. His charge-for drawing up a lease or writing a will, was one shilling ; for drawing up a bond, two shillings. After the death of his first wife, in 1796, to whom he was tenderly attached, he suffered for a time from mental depression which amounted to partial insanity. While l62 he was in this state, by advice of the Association a day of fast- ing and prayer was appointed by the church, as it appears, with- out consulting the pastor. It was arranged that Rev. Mr, Tay- lor of Deerfield should preach in the morning, and Rev. Mr. Porter of Ashfield in the afternoon. Mr. Taylor prepared a ser- mon on the subject of mental derangement not expecting that Mr. Wells would attend the meeting. But just before the ser- mon was to commence, he entered the meeting-house and took a seat. The preacher was a good deal disconcerted and begged of Mr. Porter to preach in his stead. But the latter declined and insisted that Mr. Taylor should preach the sermon which he had prepared. It proved to be a wise arrangement. Before this Mr* Wells had not realized his mental condition, but thought that his friends treated him strangely and acted like enemies. Towards the close of the afternoon service, which he also attended, while pondering the question why his friends had thus treated him, he was led to the conclusion that something was wrong in himself, that he was in fact deranged. A reac- tion at once began and his mind recovered its former tone and strength. Mr. Wells continued to discharge in full the duties of pas- tor till 1822, a period of fifty years, when the infirmities of age, then apparently about to break down his constitution, induced him and the people to seek a colleague. At the same time he consented to a reduction of one hundred dollars from his yearly salary. After this date, however, he recovered in a measure his strength and would occasionally exercise the functions of his ofiice till near the time of his death. His last (recorded) public act was the marriage of his granddaughter. Miss Sarah Wells, to Silas Rice 8 November, 1 83 1. The entry of this in the church record in his own hand, now tremulous and uncertain, forms a striking contrast to the plain, bold penmanship of his early prime. He died 8 November, 1834., in the ninety-second year of his age. The sermon at his funeral was preached by Rev,. Nathan Perkins of Amherst,, who was then the oldest survivor of Mr. Wells' particular associates. It would be foreign to my purpose to give an extended analysis of the character of Rev. Mr. Wells. I^et it suflBce to say that he was a man of undoubted piety, his sermons were largely scriptural and practical, rather than doctrinal ; he rebuked and exhorted with all his long-suffering and gentleness. As a 163 preacher he held a respectable rank among his cotemporaries, as a pastor he was pre-eminently a peace-maker, as a man he was very affable and of good social qualities. He made no ene- mies and was kind and faithful to his friends. In the course of his ministry Mr. Wells married three hun- dred and five couples and administered baptism to nine hundred and fifty-six persons. He wrote about three thousand sermons, a few of which were printed. His last sermon, written probably with no idea that it would be the last, was on Heb. iv. 9: "There remaineth therefore a rest to the people of God." But to return to the thread of our narrative. At a town meeting held 21 December, 1821, Capt. Salmon Graves, moder- ator, it was voted, "To give Mr. I/emuel P. Bates (of South- ampton) a call to settle in the gospel ministry as colleague pas- tor with the Rev. Rufus Wells. Voted, "To give Mr. Bates three hundred and fifty dollars salary per year, during Mr. Wells' natural life and four hundred fifty dollars per year dur- ing his ministry with us after the decease of Mr. Wells." Voted, "To give Mr. Bates five hundred dollars settlement to be paid in three annual instalments, and if he leaves us before the three years are expired he draws only in proportion to the time he preaches with us." Voted, "That Mr. Bates have the privilege of being dis- missed, by giving the town one year's notice, and the town have the privilege of dismissing Mr. Bates by giving him one year's notice, provided either party holds that mind during the year." This last vote was the occasion of some distrust on the part of the ordaining council. Dr. I,yman of Hatfield warmly pro- tested against the conditions therein implied, and it was not till the parties concerned declared it was their understanding, "That Mr. Bates could not be dismissed without the advice of an eccle- siastical council," that the council consented to proceed to the examination of the candidate. Mr. Bates was prdained 13 February, 1822. The order of exercises was as follows: Introductory prayer. Rev. James Taylor of Sunderland; sermon. Rev. Zephaniah Swift Moore, D. D., president of Amherst college; consecrating prayer. Rev. Dr. Lyman of Hatfield ; charge to the pastor. Rev. John Emer- son of Conway ; right hand of fellowship. Rev. Wm. B. Sprague of West Springfield; charge to the people, Rev. Henry Lord of Williamsburg ; concluding prayer, Rev. Vinson Gould of South- ampton. 164 It is a somewhat remarkable fact that one of the above council, Rev. John Emerson of Conway, was a member of the council which ordained Rev. Mr. Wells, the first pastor of the church fifty years before. By the terms of his settlement ■ Mr. Bates could claim but three hundred and fifty dollars annual salary, as the senior pas- tor was still living. But in 1828, '29 and '32 the parish (which was organized separate from the town 30 April, 1828,) granted him one hundred dollars additional. He held the ofiice of pastor for the term of ten years and was dismissed 17 October, 1832. After the dismission of Rev. L. P. Bates the church remained destitute of a pastor for four years. The pulpit was regularly supplied the while by various ministers and candidates, among whom were Rev. Messrs. Packard of Shelburne and Rev. John Eastman. The third pa^stor was Rev. John Ferguson of Dunse, Ber- wickshire, Scotland, previously settled in Attleboro. The terms of his settlement were five hundred dolfers annual salary, with the condition, "That the existing connection may he-dis- solved at the pleasure of either party by an ecclesiastical coun- cil." He was installed 16 March, 1836, the sermon being preached by Rev. John Todd of Pittsfield. Mr. Ferguson was dismissed 17 June, 1840. The church now continued without a settled ministry five years. The pulpit was supplied during the interim by Rev. Moses Chase, Rev. Sumner Lincoln, Mr. Porter H. Snow, Mr. John W. Salter and the faculty of Amherst college. Mr. Salter was invited to settle 17 February, 1843. Mr. Snow was invited 10 April, 1845, but both declined. The fourth pastor was Rev. J. H. Temple of Framingham, who was ordained 30 September, 1845, the Rev. Joel Hawes, D. D. of Hartford, Conn., preaching the sermon. The terms of his settlement were "Five hundred dollars a year as a salary as long as he is our minister, with liberty to take a vacation of three Sabbaths a year; that when either party becomes dis- satisfied, one month's notice shall be given, and this contract shall end and the connection be dissolved in the usual way." Mr. Temple was dismissed 24 March, 1852. The fifth pastor was Rev. Charles N . Seymour of Hartford, Conn., who was installed 9 March, 1853. The sermon was preached by Rev. Nahum Gale, professor in the Theological i65 seminary at East Windsor Hill, Conn. He was dismissed 27 April, 1859. The sixth pastor was Rev. John W. Lane of South New- market. N. H., who was ordained 17 October, i860. Professor Austin Phelps, D. D., of Andover Theological seminary preached the sermon, and W. A. Stearns, D. D., president of Amherst college, made the ordaining prayer. Mr. Lane's salary was fixed at eight hundred dollars a year. In the century since its organization the church has had a settled pastorate for eighty- nine years. Communion Furniture. The two flagons and the two tankards were purchased in 1797 from funds bequeathed to the church by Deacon Obadiah Dickin.son of Hatfield. The two silver cups and four tumblers were presented to the church in 1822 by Messrs. Francis, Reuben and Aaron Belden. The sil- ver baptismal basin was presented by Miss Judith White. In 1865 two silver plated plates were purchased. Singing. Choristers, "To set the psalms in meeting," were chosen by the church till 1821 when they were elected by the choir. The persons first chosen by the church, 16 Oct., 1771, were: John Waite, Jr., John Graves and Elihu Graves. Those chosen by the choir in 1821 were R. B. Harwood and Luther Warner. In 1798 the town voted, "Twenty dollars to revive singing in the town : That four pounds of it be laid out in the ea.st part of the town for the above purpose, and forty shillings be laid out in the west part to support a ciphering school or a singing school, as the inhabitants of that part shall decide, both schools to be free for all parts of the town and be under the direction of the selectmen." Sabbath SchooIv. It is believed that the first effort to gather children into classes on the Sabbath for religious instruc- tion in Whately was made by Misses Chloe Adkins and Ruth Dickinson. This was probably in the yeari820. The children learned verses of Scripture and hymns of their own selection. Mr. Wells was accustomed to go into the centre school on Sat- urday to see if the children had selected and committed to mem- ory the lesson for the next day. No regular school was organ- ized till after the settlement of Mr. Bates — perhaps not till 1826. The early teachers, besides the two already named, were Lucinda Bates, Ann Edwards, Harriet Frary, Lydia Allis, Dea. 1 66 James Smith, Dea. Justus White, Spencer Bardwell, Luther Warner, John White. One of the deacons was probably the first superintendent. For a number of years after its organiza- tion the school drew in most of the children and many of the older church members, who formed adult classes for the study of the Bible. Clergymen wtco Okiginated in Whately. Alvan Sanderson, born 13 December, 1780, son of Thomas and Lucy Sanderson ; graduated at Williams collfege 1802 ; stud- ied theology with Rev. Dr. Hyde of Lee and Rev. Dr. Lyman of Hatfield ; licensed by Berkshire association 17 October, 1804 ; ordained an evangelist at Westhampton 4 Feb., 1807, (sermon by Rev. Rufus Wells) ; installed colleague with Rev. Nehemiah Porter, Ashfield, 22 June, 1808, died 22 June, 1817. Pomeroy Belden, born 15 March, 181 1, son of Aaron and Sarah Belden; graduated at Amherst college in 1833; Andover Theological seminary 1836; ordained an evangelist at Warwick 8 August, 1837; preached as stated supply at Deerfield from 1837 to 1842 ; installed in Amherst, East Parish, 14 September, 1842 ; died 2 March, 1849. Alonzo Sanderson, born 24 June, 1808, son of Joseph and Content Sanderson ; graduated at Amherst college in 1834; An- dover Theological .seminary in 1837; ordained at Ludlow in January 1839; installed at Tolland 12 July, 1843; installed at Wellington, Ohio, i March, 1854. Mr. Sanderson was born in Bernardston, but regarded Whately as his ancestral home. William Bardwell, born 13 October, 18 13, son of Orange and Euphame Bardwell ; studied at Wesleyan university. Middle- town, Conn.; ordained by Methodist conference May, 1846; died at Northampton 1851. Perez Chapin, born 29 April, 1783, .son of Perez (M. D.) and Elizabeth Chapin; graduated at Middlebury college 1808; studied theology with Rev. Abijah Wines, Newport, N. H. ; licensed in Cornish, N. H., March, 18 10; ordained at Pownal, Me., 20 March, 181 1; died 27 January, 1839. He was a "Model of a minister of Jesus Christ." ■ Lucius W. Chapman, born 7 January, 1820, son of Isaac and Hannah Chapman ; studied at Shelburne Falls academy ; licensed in Westmoreland county, Pa., 5 February, 1842, and ordained as a Baptist minister in Jefferson county, Pa., 14 Octo- ber, 1842 ; became a Presbyterian and was installed pastor of 167 the Presbyterian church at Lycoming Centre, November, 1849; residence in 1854 Munroetown, Pa. Riifus Porter Wells, born 4 February, 1818, son of Thomas and Mary Wells; graduated at Amherst college in 1842 ; gradu- ated at Union Theological seminary. New York, 1845 ; licensed by Third Presbytery of New York 18 April, 1845 ; ordained an evangelist in Jonesboro, E. Tenn., by the Holston Presbytery 26 September, 1846; installed at Jonesboro 17 August, 1850. When the civil war broke out in 1861 Mr. Wells declined to pray for the success of the new confederacy and lost the sympa- thy of a large portion of his church ; and rather than suffer con- fiscation and imprisonment with other Union men, after long and perplexing delays and a journey with his family to Richmond and back, he procured a pass and went through the lines by way of Murfreesboro, Lebanon and Gallatin, Tenn., crossing the Cumberland river in a canoe 27 November, 1862. He preached to the United Presbyterian and Congregational churches of Prairie du Sac, Wis., till March, 1864, then one year to the Second Presbyterian church of Thorntown and the Bethel Pres- byterian church of Boone county, Ind. He spent the year 1865 in labors with the Second Presbyterian church of Knoxville, Tenn. In April, 1866, he commenced gathering a Congrega- tional church at Gilbertsville in the town of Hardwick. The church was organized 7 March, 1867, with thirty-eight members and increased to fifty-three. He left Gilbertsville December, 1868 ; was installed pastOT of the Congregational church at Southampton 5 January, 1869. George R. Ferguson, born in Attleboro 19 March, 1829, son of Rev. John and Margaret S. Ferguson ; graduated at Am- herst college 1849; studied at Andover Theological seminary 1858-59; licensed by Franklin County association July 1858; acting pastor at Northeast, Dutchess county, N. Y., for many years. Horace B. Chapin, who was installed colleague with Rev. Enoch Hale of Westhampton 8 July, 1829, dismissed i May, 1837; installed at Danville, Me., 24 July, 1839, was son of Dr. Perez and Elizabeth Chapin of Whately, but was born after his parents removed to Benson, Vt. The church was instituted 21 August, 1771. • These may certify that the following named persons, viz. : Salmon White, Simeon Waite, John Waite, Richard Chauncey, Nathan Graves, David Scott, Thomas Crafts, Daniel Morton, i§8 Israel Graves, Benjamin Smith, Philip Smith, Elisha Frary, Joshua Belding, John Waite, Jr., David Graves, Jr., Elisha Belding, Oliver Graves are members of the church of Christ in Hatfield in regular standing, and as such are recommended to be embodied in a church state among themselves. By vote of the church, DBA. DICKINSON. Hatfield, 19 Aug., 1771. In addition to these, the following persons consented to the covenant and were embodied into church state, viz.: Ebenezer Bardwell, Elizabeth BardweU, Elizabeth Belden, Submit Scott, Abigail Smith, Martha Waite, Eunice Graves, Mary White, Ruth Belden, Mary Waite, Abigail Crafts, I,ydia Stiles, Ruth Stiles, Sarah Smith, Sarah Smith, Jr., Abigail Graves, Jemima Scott, Abigail Scott, Anna Belden, Margaret Belden, Sarah Wells, Eleanor Morton, Miriam Frary, Elizabeth Chauncey, Abigail Smith and George Prutt. The latter was a slave be- longing to Richard Chauncey and died 18 Sept., 1794, 75 years of age. Of the above Elizabeth Belden was the wife of Paul, Mar- tha Waite wife of Dea. Simeon, Ruth Belden wife of Dea. Elisha, Mary Waite wife of John, Jr., Abigail Crafts wife of Benoni, Margaret Belden wife of Joseph, Sarah Wells mother of Rev., Ruf us, Eleanor Morton wife of Daniel, Abigail Smith wife of Jonathan, Elizabeth Belden Wife of Paul and a daughter of Lieut. Ebenezer Bardwell. There were eighteen males including George Prutt, a pious old slave of Richard Chauncey, and Lieut. Ebenezer Bardwell who seems to have been admitted at the same time, thus increas- ing the number to nineteen male members and twenty-four females, in all forty-three. To this number was speedily added quite a number of both sexes. Great efforts were made to sustain the preached word for quite a time and quite through the war of the Revolution, the efforts of the people to maintain their meetings, though pinched for the want of ready money, foregoing school as well as dispensing with everything that was deemed a luxury, but which would now be regarded as absolute necessities. Money raised for the support of the public schools was used to pay Mr. Wells' salary, as well as seventy pounds raised by a tax levy voted at the March meeting in 1788, five years after the close 1 69 of the Revolutionary war. This was raised to repair the meet- ing-house. This, too, was paid to Mr. Wells. Mr. Temple well observes, "That Mr. Wells managed the afiairs of a large and productive farm in connection with his ministerial duties." He was eminently successful in both call- ings. He was not personally required to pay a tax on his nice farm. He was an excellent accountant and seemed determined that his book should balance without any loss to himself. The confession of faith and the covenant are in the usual form in the Congregational denomination. The ordination of Mr. Wells was in the usual form, thirteen churches of the neigh- borhood being invited as a council. They met ''And set apart Mr. Rufus Wells to the work of the ministry,, being made an overseer of the church or flock of Christ in Whately by the lay- ing on of the handset the Presbytery, 25 Sept .,1771." The ser- vices were held under the shade of two large oaks, on the west side of the street, near the residence of the late Dr. Myron Har- wood. The sermon was by Rev. Jonathan Ashley of Deerfield, I Timothy, iv : 6. The halfway covenant prevailed for many years that per- sons not of scandalous character, could solemnly confess the covenant. This permitted such persons to have their children baptized. It was deemed efficacious in case of the death of the child in infancy, as only such could be saved. This was changed in 18 16, and only full fledged church members were accorded the right to have their children baptized. When one reflects for a moment he finds who among our people was so aggrieved that he could not endure the "grief and ofiense" that the church should continue the practice of baptiz- ing the children of such persons, and asks, who was Joel Waite? Why a man who sold rum for years at his hotel in the Straits. How often it is that men of this class are very ostentatious in their professions of possessing sensibilities. At the time of the ordination of Mr. Wells, Capt. Salmon White provided for the council. His house was nearly a mile from the place where the ceremony was performed. And we who live in a different environment are led to wonder at the unusual trouble they took to go so far. Then there were but two houses between the house of Capt. White and the place where the meeting was held, and probably both were small and inconveniept for such a council to convene in. I have often tried to picture that gathering of our grandsires and great- 170 grandsires, witli their wives and children, all intent upon per- forming this most important step in building a foundation for our new town, filled with pious zeal and anxious that this im- portant work should be done well and properly. And with what satisfaction, not to say exultation, they clung to the young man who had cast his lot with them and was, this beautiful autumnal day, made their minister, their friend and guide. This was the culmination of all their aspirations. They had settled on their farms and had labored and hoped aye, prayed. Oh! how earnestly, for the time when they could wor- ship their God in their own little town. And now looking back upon their efforts to progress to higher and better conditions, we should be ingrates did we not regard their labors with pride and gratification, that they so boldly worked for the upbuilding of religion, of good morals in the* community, for without such a foundation to build upon, their organization as a town would have lost its best, its crowning glory. The next thing was to have a meeting-house. As Mr. Temple has so eloquently told the story of the town's struggles to surmount the various obstacles that for years compelled them to worship in a building not as good as the ordinary barn of to- day, I will only add that my hearty respect for the pluck and endurance of our grandsires can only make me wish that their descendants were equally meritorious. When the bell was purchased, late in the fall of 1821, the writer was in his fifth year and well recollects hearing it rung when it was swung up on the south plate of Capt. Salmon Graves' woodshed, and it was rung amid the cheers of hosts of men and women, as well as of a crowd of girls and boys. This was on Thursday and it was rung by Mr. Simeon Reed, and that evening the first curfew was rung. The Sunday following it was rung at the same place for meeting and at noon when it was rung, I was there to see it as well as to hear its tones. It seemed as though the whole town thronged the grounds of Capt. Graves. In those days, all went to meeting and stayed to both services. The next week it was hoisted into the belfry, and every evening at 9 o'clock it rung out cheerfully, until about i860 when clocks were so abundant that the town declined to continue the practice. I well recall the facts related about its journey, its being hoisted by willing hands to its place. It was slid up on long smooth poles to the belfry window. 171 In December, 1821, the town voted to give Mr. l,enmel P. Bates a call to settle as a colleague pastor with Mr. Wells at a salary of $350 per year, to be increased to $450 after the decease of Mr. Wells, and what was called a "settlement" of $500 to be paid in three installments. He wasprdained 13 Feb., 1822, and was dismissed 17 Oct., 1832. He is remembered for his unsav- ory reputation. The town ceased its control about 1828 or '29 and the parish was organized. There has since been settled quite a number of different clergymen, among them Rev. John Ferguson, Rev. J. H. Temple, Rev. Charles N. Seymour, Rev. John W. Lana, Rev. M. F. Hardy and ao^r (1899) Rsv. George I/. Dickinson. In the interim between settled ministers I recall Rev. Mr. Snow, Rev. Mr. Chase, Rev. Mr. Lincoln, Rev. Mr. Salter, Rev. Mr. Curtis, and there were others that I do not now recall. At the second church Rev. J. S. Judd was settled in October, 1843, and dismissed in 1855. He was succeeded by Rev. Charles I/Ord, who was settled in 1856 and dismissed in i860. The second church was formed by the secession of seven- teen members from the first one who withdrew on account of the lack of sound orthodox preaching. They claimed that the preaching was verging towards Methodism. These seventeen were soon followed by others to the number of seventy-five in all, and were properly organized into a church. I well recollect hearing one Sunday a discourse, largely upon. free agency, and seeing the scowls that covered the faces of some of the good people. One lady who sat in a chair became so much incensed that she arose and, grasping her chair with both hands and turning her back to the minister, set down her chair with a bang that attracted every eye. So it was the straight laced Calvinist that seceded and then, as more liberal thought pervaded the community after the decease of the original members, the two churches were again happily reunited in 1867. They enlarged the new meeting-house, raising and fitting it up in good shape so that it is a matter of pride to the whole town. The Baptist church probably grew out of the fierce quarrel over the location of the meeting-house. There were, perhaps, a few full-fledged Baptists living in town that believed in the necessity of immersion, and others in the adjoining towns who joined with them. They built a meeting-hoase, on Poplar Hill road, two stories high, with a gallery on three sides. In 1817, the parish voted, "To cut it down four (4) feet and remove the 172 galleries." This was done by sawing oif the posts and studding, thus lowering the church, and then finished off into what was called slips. This was rededicated in October, 1817, the sermon being given by Rev. David Pease of Ashfield. The first minis- ter was Rev. Asa Todd from Westfield. He was doubtless an excellent man, but very deficient in educational qualifications, judging by the church records that he kept. He was followed by Rev. Stephen Barker from Heath, Rev. John R. Goodnoiigh, Rev. Lorenzo Rice, who remained several years, then Rev. James farker and then Rev. George Bills, an Englishman. Since Mr. Bills they have had occasional preaching, but gave up their organization 23 Aug., 1850. After 1818 a small Methodist society was organized and a certificate reciting the facts was filed with the town clerk. It is quite likely this was to avoid taxation by the regular orthodox church, as then every taxpayer was taxed by the town for the support of the regular order, and many avoided this by filing their certificates with the town clerk that they were members of some other religious society. The Universalist society was organized 20 May, 1839. The warrant was issued for the first regular meeting by Luke B. White, Esq., on a petition of fourteen of its members dated 18 April, 1839. A constitution and by-laws were adopted with the understanding that as many Sabbath meetings should be held as the funds raised would allow. It began with one Sunday per month for the first year and ended in i860 with preaching half of the time. On the formation of the Unitarian society, in 1865, the members of the Universalist all joined heartily with those who favored the forming of the Unitarian society, and a meeting-house was built and dedicated 17 Jan., 1867. The pas- tors were Rev. E. B. Fairchild, three years. Rev. George H. El- dridge, two years, and Rev. Leonard W. Brigham, about three and one-half years, with several young men in the interim of settled pastors. A large number of the wealthiest members removed to other towns, and the society ceased to exist about the year 1876. CHAPTER X. WHATELY ROADS. The system of highways originally adopted by Hatfield, and partially carried out before the incorporation of this town, has been already mentioned. The idea was to give every land- owner ready access to his several lots. The system was roads running north and south through the town, crossed at right angles by east and west roads, extending from the meadows to the town limits. This could be easily effected because the sys- tem was devised before the Commons were divided. The Straits road was the Indian trail and practically di- vided the River Meadows from the Upland Commons. The Chestnut Plain road was a space of ten rods wide left between the two main divisions of Commons. The east and west roads were reserved lots in the Commons. The only cross roads within Whately limits, laid out by Hatfield, were the Christian Lane, between lots No. 36 and 37 in the second division, and Mt. Esther road, between lots No. 26 and 27 in the fourth division. These two roads, as laid out in 17 16, were coinci- dent at the Chestnut Plain crossing, and taken together ex- tended from the west line of the Bradstreet farm, to "the end of the six miles from the great river." The course was not quite a straight line, as the Mt. Esther road from Chestnut Plain bore due east and west. All the roads laid by Hatfield were ten rods wide. • It seems to have been the original intention to lay the north and south through roads at about half a mile distant from each other, and it was pretty well understood where the line of a road would be. This is shown by the location of the earliest houses. 174 Capt. Lucius AUis, Lieut. EHsha Frsry, Edward Brown, Simeon Morton and other settlers knew where to build, and a road was sure, in due time, to come to them. The road north and south over Spruce Hill and Chestnut mountain to Hatfield line was laid out by Whately in 1772, and the same year the town voted, "That Samuel Dickinson have liberty to make bars or gates near the southerly end of this road for his convenience." These gates were ordered to be removed and the road made an open highway in 1783. The road from Conway line over Poplar hill by the Baptist meeting-house, and so on over Hog mountain to the south line of the town, was laid out 1773 and was early accepted as a county road. A road from Conway line to the south line of Whately, west of the Poplar hill road was laid out in 1774. Probably the following has reference to this road: 1785, "Voted, To open and clear the road running southerly from Simeon Morton's by Paul Smith's to Williamsburg line." A road was laid in 1778 from Conway line southerly to the highway south of Elisha Frary's, and from the above highway between said Frary's house and barn, southeasterly. Probably this was a designated line of a through road but its history is obscure. It seems to have been continued to West brook, and along the north bank of said brook to meet the Stony hill road, and the road running southwesterly, by the southwest school- house, was probably a branch or continuation of it in that direction . The line of the Claverack road, probably so named by the soldiers who returned from an expedition to Claverack, N. Y., in 1779, perhaps from a real or fancied resemblance to thatplace, seems to have been established by tradition and worked as houses were built. The following votes probably refer to this line: 1777, a committee was chosen to view a road from the Egypt road north to the Deerfield line and survey the same. 1780, a road three rods wide was laid from Eleazer Frary's to Hatfield line, "Beginning half a mile east of Chestnut Plain street, to lands reserved by the proprietors of Hatfield for a road at the east end of Mill Swamp." 1779, Voted, "To lay a road to the dwelling house of Ebenezer Bardwell, Jr." It is likely that the whole line was originally known as the "Island road", and that it was actually opened from Christian Lane south in 1780, To "lay out" a road, and to "accept" a road, as the terms were then used, probably fail to convey a true idea to us now. 175 A vote to that effect did not show that a highway was put in complete order and well graded, but meant that a way was marked oul! and was made passable or possible. Sometimes it only meant that if a person traveled the designated. route he should not be liable for damages for crossing his neighbor's land and that if he got mired the survej'or was bound to help him out without charge. In 1771 the town granted £16 for repair- ing highways and allowed 2S. 6d. per day for highway work, which would give only 128 days' work for all the roads. The plan of east and west roads, as actually laid out, is very complicated and the record very confused. Excepting Christian Lane, and the Mt. Esther road from Spruce hill west- ward, scarcely one remains to-day as originally established, and the line of many of the early crossroads would be wholly unin- telligible to the present generation. A "close" road was often laid to accommodate a single individual. The roads leading from Chestnut Plain street to Belden's mills, were laid, and re- laid, and altered, and discontinued as new interests sprung up. And the same is true of the roads in the southwest and north- west parts of the town. Convenience for the time being was, perhaps unavoidably, the rule of location and discontinuance. In 1772 the town voted that both the westerly and easterly (i. e. from Chestnut Plain as a base line) crossroads be laid out three rods wide. And where not otherwise specified this is believed to be the uniform width. The road from Chestnut Plain near the old meeting-house, southeasterly through ''Egypt" to Hatfield, does not appear to have been accepted as a highway by either Hatfield or Whately, though it was the convenient and the traveled way from the earliest settlement of the territory. Christian Lane and the road over Mount Esther, as already stated, were reserved lots ten rods wide and were in a continU' ous line. The lane was a ''bridle path" in 1756 and a rough log ''causeway" in 1761, and Mill river was then crossed by a fordway. In 1773 the town voted to build a foot bridge over the Mill River swamp, near the house of Dea. Simeon Wait (the J. C. Loomis place.) Originally the lane extended only to the Straits. The road from Bartlett's corner to Canterbury, north of the cemetery, was laid in 1820. From Chestnut Plain westerly the road, as first traveled, followed nearly the line of the reserved lot, varying only to escape "The gutter" and to get ■ an easier ascent up t-hehilh 176 That part "From the foot of Mt". Esther through land of Ensign Elisha Allis to Abraham Turner's barn on Poplar Hill" was .laid out in 1773. From the foot of Mt. Esther to the Chestnut Plain street the location has been changed several times. In 1786 the town voted to establish the alterations in the highway from Whately meeting-house to Conway, beginning four rods south of the brook and running through the northeast part of Jonathan Allis' land on the old road, etc., and to the old road near the foot of the hill near Dea. Samuel Wells' house in Con- way. In 1801 record is made of a new location from Chestnut Plain road on Levi Morton's north line to the old road near the pound. West lane, as it now runs, was laid out in 1819. Probably the Hatfield authorities had no thought of a new town when they marked off the Commons and reserved the lots for highways. But the intersection of those reserved highway lots determined where the central village of the new town should be. And this line from Bartlett's corner to Poplar Hill was the natural location for a road. Great swamp could not be so readily crossed at any other point, and the ascent of the hills was most feasible here. , This was the earliest opened of any of the crossrcais and was the most important, as it furnished a convenient way for the Canterbury and Straits people, on the one hand, and the West Whately families on the other, to get to meeting on the Sabbath and to town meeting. After ready access to the meeting-house had been obtained the next important care was to secure a convenient way to mill. Taylor's mills, which best accommodated many families, were over the line in Deerfield and consequently the road up Indian Hill is not noticed on our records. Belden's mills at West brook were accessible from the Straits by means of the road on the Hatfield side of the line running west, near where the pres- ent road runs and so across West brook bridge. Roads for general convenience -Were established early. In 1776 a committee was appointed to view a road from Poplar Hill road, beginning seven rods north of West brook bridge, and running .southwesterly to Dry Hill, and another committee to view a road running northwesterly from Poplar Hill road, beginning at the north end of Noah Field's land, to Conway line. This last was laid out the next year. In 1779 the town voted, "That the road which leads from the Straits to Nathaniel Coleman's be an open road, with this restriction, that Benjamin Scott, Jr.j shall keep a good gate at Deerfield road, another on 177 Hopewell Hill one month, another the whole of the year at the south side of his land in Hopewell." Mention is made Jan. 8, 1778, of a road laid across land of Abial Bragg and Oliver Graves. In 1779 a road was laid to Joseph Nash's and the next year from Joseph Nash's to the Conway line. In 1780 the road east of Ebenezer Scott's land was discontinued. In 1783 a road was laid from Asa Sanderson's westerly to the Williams- burg line. In 1785 a close road three rods wide was laid out from the river road, at a point eight rods north of Joshua Bel- den's house to the Connecticut river, and near the same time Mr. Belden opened a ferry across the river. A way was also laid out that year from Poplar Hill road by the Elijah Sanderson place to Moses Munson's mill. A road was laid out the same year from the road running west from John Smith's northerly to Poplar Hill road near Peter Train's house. Of the roads laid in comparatively modern times one from Chestnut Plain to the Island, between lands of Capt. Henry Stiles and Lieut. John White, was established in 18 10. The highway from Dea. James Smith's mills down the valley by Capt. Seth Bardwell's, was laid out in 1824. The road from the foot of Spruce Hill, southwesterly to the Hiram Smith place, was laid out in 1834. The road to South Deerfield, from Gutter bridge through Great swamp, was established in 1835, and the next year the way leading from the lane north was relocated, and near the swamp moved to the west. The Deerfield road was in use probably as early as the set- tlement of Deerfield, about 167 1, and was in constant use in 1764 as the only way to communicate with the people of Deer- field. This road leaves the Main street in Hatfield between the houses — when I was a boy — of Solomon Dickinson and his brother's widow, Nancy Dickinson, then by the Elisha Waite place, up Clay Hill, so called, on to the second level then fol- lowed a northerly course through the Straits to South Deerfield, keeping on the Plain to the Straits and so over the North plain. For many years the direct road much of the way was sandy and difiBcult to travel with loaded teams. It doubtless struck the Indian trail after getting some fifty or sixty rods from the top of Clay Hill and very likely that trail was utilized for a road. It ran nearly one and one-half miles on' the limits of the Gov. Bradstreet grant, as all of the Straits and quite a strip north of Bartlett's corner is on this grant, then into the second Division 178 of Commons through which it passes to South Deerfield. This was the main road up the valley for over a hundred years, or until about 1840, when the roads were built through Great swamp and the hills were graded, and now the old Deerfield road is seldom used. The river road passes through a lovely region as well as a very fertile and well-cultivated section of our town. The writer of this had a plan of the survey of the Chestnut Plain street in his possession, but gave it to Irving Allis, but preserved this description of it. It was the survey of the road from the top of Clay Hill in Hatfield through Whately to Conway, over Indian Hill, to where it intersects the Conway and South Deerfield road under the authority of the town of Hatfield before the town of Whately was incorporated. This survey was made in 1770. We here present the following extract from the Hatfield town records : "At a legal meeting of the proprietors of the Com- mons in Hatfield lying in the six mile grant, 21 Nov. 1743. Voted, by the proprietors that the highway between the second and fourth division, run as follows : To begin where the high- way ends that is laid out on the west side of Mill river swamp, and from thence to run to the upper or north side of the forty- fifth lot in said fourth division, as staked out by the proprietors' committee in the present year. And from thence to run north- west fifty-eight rods to the north side of lot No. 50, staked out as aforesaid, and from thence north to Deerfield line. At this point it veers to the northwest, up to Pete Hill and so on up Indian Hill and on to Conway." This road I presume to be the real base line of the roads afterwards laid. This, as all the roads, was laid ten rods wide, but since some have been reduced to three rods. The Chestnut Plain street still retains its original width. Please note that Chestnut Plain street began "Where the high- way ends." Here allow me to say that Silas G. Hubbard, who fully understood the Hatfield roads, told the writer that each side of the Mill swamp division was a road one-half mile apart. From this fact I certainly tliink, as did Mr. Hubbard, that the Claverack road^as now called — was a continuation of the road on- the east side of Mill swamp. How early these roads were laid I do not know, certainly before 1743. So we have good rea- son to suppose that the Claverack road existed from about 1716 to 1743- . It -was doubtless true that the north and south roads were 179 intended to be about one-half mile apart, particularly from Chestnut Plain street east. Then the places where roads were to be worked were indicated so plainly that when Simeon Mor- ton settled on the Dry Hill road he well knew where the road was to be. The same is also true of L,ieut. Noah Bardwell and Peter Train. Edward Brown built on the proposed Poplar Hill road, that was laid out in 1773, from Conway line to the south line of Whately. The Dry Hill road was laid in 1774. Our theory about these and other roads is that the people well understood where the toads were eventually to be worked, as in 1777 the tovvn chose a committee to view a road from Egypt road north to the Deeriield line, and then in 1780 the Claverack road was laid from Eleazer Frary's to Hatfield line. Eleazer Frary lived on the Alonzo Crafts place in the lane, so it is very evident that the road was there, by the action of Hat- field prior to this, as Niles Coleman lived there then. As will be seen by reference to the will of Reuben Belden, dated 27 Nov., 1775, he gave the town of Whately "The farm or land in said Whately, with the dwelling house standing there- on, lying on the Island, so called, in which Niles Coleman now lives." The evidence is simply culminative and to the effect that the people of that day well knew where the roads had b'een es- tablished by Hatfield. How long Niles Coleman had lived there we do not know or who had built the house that was a log house we cannot tell, but it was pulled down and the present house built very soon. Mr. Temple doesn't give any dates of the laying out of the highway from Deerfield line past the Abraham Parker place to connect with the highway running through the Gov. Bradstreet farm, but the records of the proprietors of Bradstreet 's grant say: "At a legal meeting of the proprietors, held 16 May, 1718, it was voted, that we will have a highway to run through the upper mile in the most convenient place," and a great gate was to be built at the north end that leads out to Canterbury. This was built by Ebenezer Bardwell and another at the end of the upper mile, built by Josiah Scott, and this was the direct road to Sunderland, and as we find the date of 1718 we can but conclude that the road past the Abraham Parker place was in existence as early as 1718. The road from the river road to the Deerfield road Mr. Tem- ple says was laid in 1 756 and struck the Straits below the .John Waite place running south of the cemetery. This has since i8o been straightened. Then he says: "In 1 755 a road was laid from the Straits eastwardly by Ebenezer Morton's to the road dividing Old farms and West farms, thence to Dennison's grant." Who was Ebenezer Morton ? Where did he live ? And where is the road ? Most certainly not in Whately. Considerably earlier than this a path had been marked out and traveled from the Straits near "Mother George" north- westerly through "Egypt" to Chestnut Plain street, so Mr. Temple says. Now the Mother George road did not lead to or from the Straits, as the Mother George road had its mouth or junction exactly where the Ferguson house stands, now owned by H. A. Brown, then running east to a ford of Mill river thence running southerly, west of the barns of John M. Crafts and Pat- rick Conolly, thence southeasterly to the south line of R. M. Swift's land, bought of Orrin Dickinson, and so on in the same southeast course to the Egypt road, crossing it diagonally and keeping the same course across the Capt. Smith lot, formerly owned by the writer, and met the Deerfield road about fifteen rods north of the Joseph Scott place, owned later by Elijah Bel- den, on the west side of Deerfield road in Hatfield. The writer has been over this Mother George road for seventy years. The wet spots were corduroyed, and the old, much-de- cayed poles are still in existence. This was the route over which our earlier settlers went to Hatfield. And one going then from Northampton would have to go through Hatfield then over Mother George to Whately and Conway, either by the Indian Hill route or else by the Mt. Esther route. We have no other date for the Christian Lane road than that of its being laid out or left for a road 29 April, 1716. This lot was 8 rods, 11 feet and 4 inches wide at Chestnut Plain street and some wider at the Straits. Mr. Temple says: "Christian I^ane and the road over Mt. Esther, as already stnted, were in a continuous line." Here I must differ from Mr. Temple, as the lot left for a road in the fourth division was between lots No. 26 and 27, and was between Horace Manning's house and the house of Dono- van brothers. From the north side of lot 26, in the fourth division of Commons, to the s,outh line of the Christian Lane road is 224 rods, so the two roads could not have been in con- tinuous line. But there was never a road built on the lot left for a road between 26 and 27. But the road turned from Chest- nut Plain street just north of the Oliver Morton blacksmith shop just south of the W. I. Fox house and then ran diagonally I8l from that' point to the "Pound" and then up the hill and on over Easter to West Whately, striking the Poplar Hill road near the house of Abraham Turner, just north of the Baptist meeting-house. Had Hatfield located the West Whately road between lots 36 and 37 instead of 26 and 27, it would have been some twenty-five rods too far south to have been coincident, as Mr. Temple claimed. The road over Easter was laid by Whately in 1773. The Lover's Lane was laid out, as it now runs, in 1819 at the in- stance of Elijah Allis, who was then about to build the hotel. Dr. Bardwell had then built his house and where the hotel stands was the location for horse sheds. These were torn down or removed, probably torn down, as there were no sheds any- where about the church as early as 1825, as I well recollect. When the West Whately road over Easter reached the lowlands north of Irving Allis' house it branched off from the Conway road, running under Mt. Easter, or Esther, up by the house of Dea. Samuel Wells, more recently owned by Seth B. Crafts. The Spruce Hill road was probably early designated, but was really laid out by the town in 1773. This ran on the top of the hill starting from the Conway road, a little west of the house of George Dickinson, and south over Chestnut mountain. That this was a designated road at an early date we have proof in the fact that Dea. Nathan Graves built on the west side of this road, on the top of Chestnut mountain, in 1762 and in 1772 the town records say it was accepted as a town way. The Poplar Hill road, leading from Conway line to the south line of the town, was laid on and over Shingle Hill, past the residences of Lieut. John Brown, Abraham Turner, Noah Field, Edward Brown, Peter Train, Lieut. Noah Bardwell and Zenas Field and was, doubtless, designated by the Hatfield authorities and formally accepted by the town in 1773. South of Zenas Field's the Grass Hill road commenced and led to Williamsburg and, as Mr. Temple well says, "In 1785 the town voted to open and clear the road running southerly from Simeon Morton's by Paul Smith's to Williamsburg line." This was the Dry Hill road running by Elihu Waite's, Simeon Morton's and Col. Ames' houses. In 1824 the road, leading from the Mitchell corner up the brook to intersect with the road leading from Poplar Hill road to Dea. James Smith's mill, was laid and worked. The road from Poplar Hill road to Munson's mills was laid in 1785. The mills were built in 1784. 182 In 1788 a road was laid from near West brook bridge to Belden's mills. It is well known that Samuel Belden was a cousin of and successor to Reuben Belden who died in 1776. In 1788 there were iron works, used probably for melting scrap iron and possibly smelting from iron ore, bi^t most likely the working of scrap iron. This mill, or factory, stood near the site of the barn on the lyemuel Waite place. About this date the iron works ceased and the mill was turned into a distillery for the manufacture of rye, gin or whiskey, by a company consisting of Gen. Seth Murray, Gen. Dickinson, Seth Bardwell, Samuel Belden and others. To accommodate this mill the road was laid as follows: "Beginning at Hatfield line at West brook bridge, running north one rod, then west two and one-half degrees, north fifteen rods, then west thirty-one degrees, north seven rods to the northeast corner of the mill, then north five rods to the top of the hill for the convenient turning of teams." This was voted at a legal town meeting held 2 March, 1789. It is quite probable that the mills were either burned or torn down before 1804, as no trace of them is found or any party who could tell what became of them since I was old enough to be interested in such historical matters. I have heard my father speak of this mill and distillery and of Chester Harding having sketched the appearance of some of the people who brought rye to the mill. He had a natural ability to sketch them in a ludicrous manner when a mere boy. "Egypt" road was built early and affords a passage from Deerfield road to Claverack road. I have never seen any record of the laying out of the road through "Egypt" and yet it fur- nished the people living in the Straits a way to go to mill and the sawmill, as well as to Northampton. When this road was laid, or by whom, I do not know, but it has long been a trav- eled roadway leading from Claverack to the Deerfield road, cer- tainly for more than seventy-five years, and been repaired by the town all these years. There has been only one change made in it within my recollection, when my father's uncles, Rufus and Caleb, bought the lands of Israel and William Dick- inson, now partly owned by the town of Whately. The road was mostly owned by Caleb Dickinson until the Plain was reached, then it veered to the north and ran on to the land that the Crafts brothers bought. The Dickinsons bought of Caleb Dickinson a strip two rods wide from that point to Deerfield road, and the roadway was thus straightened, Caleb reserving 183 the wood, but after chopping it off the stumps would average from twelve to fifteen inches high. This was in 1825 and then we used to drive through there, the wheels sometimes going over a dozen stumps in driving the fifty rods or so. Then my father used to go and cut down the stumps, as we had a dozen acres or so in corn. At noon, after eating his dinner, he would work on that road until he cut them out clean, the town paying him for the work. And so it has been occupied. The Stony Hill road was laid in 1777 from the Poplar Hill road, near Nathan Waite's and his son, Jeremiah's, who had bought first on Shingle Hill and subsequently of Capt. Church and his sister, the house and land where his son, Nathan, then his son, John Bement Waite, and his son, Willis F., now lives. So it was from here that the road was laid in 1777, between the houses of John Smith and Maj. Phineas Frary on Spruce Hill road, over Stony Hill to connect with the road that was in existence up Mill Hill, north of George B. McClelan's to the mill. The people had that road up Mill Hill as early as 1778. This, after getting up the hill, turned a square corner and ran south to the mill about thirty rods. This road over Stony Hill was discontinued when the county laid the road down by the brook, about 1830, and about that time the road from the mill to Chestnut Plain street, north of George B. McClelan's, and then a road was laid down by the brook, where it now is. What is called the crossroad runs between the lands of Capt. Henry Stiles and Dea. John White and ran from Chestnut Plain street to Claverack. A brick schoolhouse was erected at the time of the opening of the road, in 1810. This opened the way to the schoolhouse for the children living in Claverack and shortened the distance to the post ofi&ce. The schoolhouse was at the junction of the crossroad and Chestnut Plain street. And now a few words to emphasize the improvements that have been going on from year to year relative to the roads and bridges. This we conceive to be an element in the history of our town that should be laid fairly before our readers. The chairman of your board of selectmen infor6ied me that all of the bridges of sixteen feet in length and over were now built of iron or steel. When the town commenced replacing the old wooded structures with iron, they nsed wooden "joists or sleepers. These are now being taken out and steel joists used in their places, thus eliminating the danger of a collapse in the near future. We all 1 84 know that highway workers are quite apt to say without due and thorough examination "O, I guess it's safe and all right" and, first you know, down goes the bridge. Only a few years ago an omnibus load of young people, some twelve or fifteen of them, drawn by four horses, descended the hill on the South Deerfield road at a smart gait and struck the wooden bridge with such force that the bridge fell. This struc- ture was about thirty -five to forty feet long. The horses and all fell into the water and were saved with great difiSculty. The weather was cold and their clothing was frozen, and great ap- prehensions were felt for their ultimate recovery. The town had to settle, the best it could, the damages incurred by this acci- dent (if we may so term it). The approach to the bridge was as low as the bridge. Few people properly consider the blow a bridge receives when a four-horse team rushes at a high rate of speed, with its heavy load of human beings, and strikes the bridge. Of course, this was replaced by an iron structure. The solid stone abutments were raised higher, making a rise to the bridge in its approach as you came down the hill. The wooden sleepers have given place to solid steel, and thus a serious danger is avoided. When it is feasible, stone abutments for the small runs have taken the place of an old log, placed on each side of the brook, ' or run. When the writer was a boy, seventy to seventy-five years ago, there was no effort to grade down the short though steep pitches, or build up the bridge. Sleepers were laid across the logs and, instead of planks, they used fairly straight poles, of from four to six inches in diameter, and as one drove down the little hill it was necessary to be on your guard or you would be thrown out of the wagon. Now good stone abutments are in use and often the bridge or covering is made of large flat stones, or arched over and raised sufficiently to afford abundant room for the water flow in times of heavy freshets. The town seems to be waking up to the necessity of using some of the surplus cobble stones in macadamizing the clay hills, like the Dr. Dickinson Hill and Gutter Hill. In the spring these hills are fearful, and the improvements come slowly but surely, and if only a small distance is done in a year it will soon be completed and all these improvements are now going on. The advocates of thorough work are in the ascendency and it is this kind of work that tells for the benefit of the town. Good roads and bridges that carry you safely over help i85 greatly to induce outsiders, of a class that is needful to build up the town, to come in. It also stimulates, to an extent, improve- ments in our houses and farm buildings, promotes a pleasant feeling when we ride out orhear this remark from those who occasionally ride through our town: "You seem to be doing something to improve your town." The old method of building our roads over the hills has largely given place to the construction of roads in the valleys following the streams, thus facilitating travel and the ease of drawing loads from town to town or in one's own town. For- merly we had to mount the hills and either go over Mt. Esther or reach the Poplar Hill to get to the west part. Since 1825 we have been saved all of that tedious drive by the building of the road up the valley of West brook, affording a fine, feasible route and a pleasant roadway, and so of others. Think of the fearful hills to climb to get over Shingle Hill to go to Haydenville. Now we have a fine road at the foot of the hill, affording a pleasant drive, following a little brook quite a portion of the way. Then there was also the Spruce Hill road, now seldom used since the completion of the road down the valley from the E. S. Munson place to the center of the town. I might mention other improvements, but these seem sufficient to illustrate my point. The foregoing is an imperfect sketch of the highways of Whately. Some roads were established and opened, of which no record can be found. In some cases the town ordered the survey and location of a road and afterwards reconsidered its action but, in the meantime, the road had actually been opened to travel. Thus the records fail to furnish data for a complete history of our private and public highways. These details may seem to be of trivial importance, but they were vital questions in their day. Individual and district pros- perity hinged on the establishment or refusal to locate a road, on the adoption of this or that line, or whether it was an open or a close way. And these details have in themselves a certain historic value. There is always a reason for locating a road. The reason may lie at the beginning or the end of the line, it may be a per- sonal or a public reason, the reason may be apparent or it may be concealed. And a careful study of the subject never fails to educe some valuable facts illustrative of sectional and general interests, illustrative of wise forethought or foolish afterthought. 1 86 The name of a road is expressive like the name of a town or the baptismal name of a person. The direction of a road indicates the course of settlement or the opening of a new industry or out- let of a trade. The general history of its highways, is the history, in out- line, of the rise and progress or the decay of the industrial pur- suits of a town. Now in closing our talk upon the roads we would congratulate our townsmen upon the evidences of thrift and prosperity everywhere visible. CHAPTER XI. EDUCATION. As the early action of this town on matters pertaining to education had reference only to the town's own interests and was influenced by the varying circumstances of local growth and prosperity, this chapter is necessarily made up largely of votes and incidents, often apparently trivial. But these incidents and votes are worth preserving because, while they reveal the senti- ment and plans of each succeeding generation and the conflict- ing interests of different sections, they also show that the public free school system is the one best adapted to our state of society and best answers the demands of a growing people and a free government. Its flexibility is an advantage. Its voluntary character is an advantage. Its dependence on an annual vote of the citizens is an advantage. Even the suspension of the schools for a year, in case of great emergency, has its compensa- tions, for then the father and mother are made to realize their personal responsibility for their children's welfare, and are led to put forth efibrts and make sacrifices which directly and indi- rectly promote true education and which furnishes an illustration of life's exigencies which benefits both parent and child. To kilow the world is as important as to know books. To acquire the habit of observing and thinking and- putting forth the energies to master difficulties, is as much a part of school duty as to recite lessons. The Puritan fathers had a broad and true conception of what education is, and among the earliest acts passed, was one requiring the selectmen of towns to see to it that parents and masters train up their children "In learning i88 and labor and other employments which may be profitable to the Commonwealth." For the learning and habits of industry and knowledge of some profitable employment, here enjoined, not only fitted the child to become a useful member of the state, but at the same time fitted him for individual excellence and happiness. The proper aim of school instruction, as of all instruction to children, is to fit them for eflBcient duty. There is need of knowledge, need of culture and need to learn the dangers of life and how to shun them, as well as the best way to use its advantages. The child needs to get a true idea of his dependence on others for his happiness and influence, and to believe in and respect the rights of others, as well as to believe in his personal independence and claim his own rights. He needs to have his wits sharpened early if he is to be a successful competitor for position and power. Our public schools, where all classes mingle and where courses of study are adapted to the various capacities and where restraint and liberty are wisely adjusted and where parents and teachers co-operate, as they do in every successful school, and home and school discipline supplement each other, our public schools, thus administered, furnish the best preparation for prac- tical life. Probably parochial and patronage schools and pri- vate tutors would insure a higher standard of merely scientific attainment to particular classes in the community, but the true education of the people is, beyond question, best promoted by (Our free school system. The first year the town made no provision for schools. The season was well advanced before the new order of things got fairly established, and there were no schoolhouses. In 1772, at the annual meeting in March, it was voted, "To raise ^^13, 6s, 8d for schooling, and that the selectmen lay out the money in Chestnut Plain, Straits and Poplar Hill streets, said school money being proportioned to each street agreeably to whgt they respectively paid in the last year's rate." The schools in each street, for this and several succeeding years, were kept at pri- vate houses. A frame of a schoolhouse was put up this year in Chestnut Plain street, directly south of the meeting-house, but it was not finished. Probably it remained unfit for use for sev- eral years, as in 1774, the question came before the town to see if any conveniences should be made in the meeting-house for schooling. The town voted in the negative — very wisely it would appear, as the meeting-house was quite as unfinished as 1 89 the schoolhousei The sum of £15, 63, 8J appears to have been raised for schooling during each of the next three years and the money was divided and expended as in 1772. In 1775 the following school committee was chosen : Benjamin Smith, Joseph Scott, Joseph Belden, Jr., Thomas Crafts, Elisha Belden, Perez Bardwell, John Smith, Peter Train, Deacon Nathan Graves. The pressure of the war now became severe, and for several years no public money was raised for schooling, and it is not likely that any schools were maintained. An English School. At a meeting held r Dec, 1777, the town voted, "To accept the piece of land given by Reuben Belden, deceased, for the use of schools in the town of Whately, upon conditions named in his will." In explanation of this vote an extract from the will of Reuben Belden of Hatfield, who died 1776, is here given : "Furthermore, I give and bequeath to the inhabitants of the town of Whately, in the County of Hampshire, for the sole use and benefit of an English School to be kept there, as hereafter mentioned, the estate, hereafter described, (the same to remain unalienable by the said town, ) viz, : That farm, or tract of land in said Whately, with the dwelling house standing thereon, in which Niles Coleman now lives, lying on the Island, so called, between the lands of Henry Stiles and Elisha Balding, and bounded west upon the Mill River, and extending thence east two hundred rods, and carrying the width of seventeen rods the length aforesaid : And I hereby appoint and impower the selectmen of the said town of Whately for the time being for- ever hereafter to take the care and direction of the improvement of the said farm, and the issues and profits of the same, and the buildings thereon and appurtenances thereof to employ for the benefit of the said school. And this gift and bequest I make upon the' following conditions and no otherwise, viz. : That the said school be kept in that street in the said town called the Chestnut Plain street, near where the present itieeting-house stands, and that the same be set up within two years from the time of my decease, and be not suffered at any time thereafter to cease or fail to be kept up and maintained for the term of six months in any future year : And in case such schools as afore- said shall not be set up at or near the said place in the said street, and within the time above limited, and be kept and main- tained in manner as aforesaid, then it is my will that the said estate shall be and remain to my kinsmen hereafter named and their heirs." The tract of land above specified was lot 21, in the second division of Commons. It appears that the town failed to take igo the necessary steps to carry out tlie provisions of the will, and consequently the bequest was forfeited. The will of Reuben Belden was dated 27 Nov., 1775, pro- bated 3 Sept., [776. Mention is made of his sisters; Kunice, wife of James Porter of Hatfield, Dorothy, wife of EHsha Billing of Hardwick, Submit, wife of David Scott of Whately, Martha, wife of Warham Smith of Hadley. He also names his late wife's sisters, Mary, wife of Samuel May, Hannah, wife of Joseph Flowers, Susannah Pierce, all of Wethersfield, niece, Mary, wife of Jona." Pierce of Hartford, cousins, Samuel Bel- den and Silas Porter of Hatfield. His inventory amounted to ;^2,486, 4s, 6d. He owned grist and sawmills on West brook — the Isaac Frary privilege — before 1770, afterwards owned by his cousin, Samuel Belden. He owned real estate in Hatfield, Whately, Hatfield Equivalent and Ashfield. He bequeathed to the inhabitants of New Township No 7 (Hawley) in the county of Hampshire, lot No. 115 in that township for the sole use and benefit of an English school to be kept there, etc. In 1780 the town voted to build three schoolhouses and the next year voted to put off building the same. But about this time a schoolhouse sixteen feet square was built in the Straits, on the corner southwesterly from the Zebina Bartlett place, another was built on Poplar Hill road, by private individuals, and there is some evidence that one was built on Spruce Hill, wHich was used for a time by the dwellers on Chestnut Plain street. In 1782-83-84 Mary White, Jr., taught a school in Chest- nut Plain street, but whether in a schoolhouse or private house the record does not say. In 1784 the town raised ^18 to be divided into three equal parts, £(i for each street, and Noah Bardwell, Josiah Allis and Thomas Sanderson were appointed a committee to lay it out. Zilpah Stiles was employed to teach in the center nineteen weeks. In 1785 ;^i8 was granted, to be divided as in '84, and a schoolmaster was employed for ten weeks, beginning June II. The reasons for a summer term probably were that the first schoolhouses had no fireplaces, and it was inconvenient for fam- ilies to let their rooms during the cold season, and the cost of fuel would subtract too much from the scant funds at the dis- posal of parents and committees. Mr. Backus was schoolmaster in 1787. Miss Stiles was again employed in '89. She appears to 'have been a very useful person in the new town, teaching school 191 as occasion required, and at other times doing the tailoring and dressmaking of the families until her marriage with Peter Clark. In 1789 the town voted, "To appropriate the money raised for schooling to pay arrearages in Mr. Wells' salary." The town voted, 6 Dec, 1790, "To provide five school- houses for the use of the town ; that the house now built in the east district, which is sixteen feet square, be sufiBcient for that part of the town ; that the Chestnut Plain schoolhouse be 20 x 16 feet; that the Spruce Hill, district schoolhouse be 20 x 16 feet ; that the Poplar Hill schoolhouse be 15 x 18 feet, and that the town will give the proprietors of the house now in that street the sum of £11, los; that the Grass Hill schoolhouse be 15 x 18 feet." The Straits schoolhouse stood as already described. The one in the center was directly south of the meeting-house. The one on Spruce Hill was about forty rods south of Levi Morton's, now the Rufus Dickinson place. The house for the Poplar Hill district was built on land of Lieut. Noah Bardwell, about ten rods south of the west burying ground, on the west side of the road, (The old stepstone may now be seen on the spot.) In the same year ^30 was appropriated for schooling, the money to be. proportioned on the children in each district from eight to twenty-one years of age. The rule of apportioning the school money varied — in some years it was divided equally to each district, sometimes one-half on the scholar and one-half to a district. In 1827 the town voted to number the children on the first of May, from seven to twenty, and divide the money on the scholar. After a schoolhouse was built on Spruce Hill, Judith White sometimes kept there and sometimes in the centre. "Master Roberts," whose, full name was George Roberts, taught in town many years, certainly from 1795 to 7804 and perhaps longer. Other early teachers were Rebecca Baker, Electa AUis, Thomas Clark, Mr. Osgood, John Parmenter, Benj. Mather, Thomas Sanderson, Jr. In 1785 Simeon Morton, Lieut, Noah Bardwell, Capt. Phin- eas Frary, John White, Joel Waite, 2d, were chosen school committee. In 1798 the town voted to reduce the number of school districts from five to four. In 1799 ;^5o was voted to build a schoolhouse in Chestnut Plain street, 30 x 24 feet. As this was the first large and fin- ished schoolhouse in town, and was evidently looked upon as a 192 model house of the day, it 11:35' be wf 11 to give the specifications: Contracted with Benjamin Scott, for ;^42,i7s, to luild the new schoolhouse, to be rough boarded and clapbcarded and shingled, a chimney built and a hearth laid, the house to be glazed win- dow shutters on the outside and the outside door hung. As is often the case when men begin to be extravagant the money first appropriated proved insufficient to fully carry out the idea and later in the year a committee consisting of John White, William Mather and Solomon Adkins was appointed, who sold the finishing of the house to Luther White, the lowest bidder, for $6 7. This house stood on the east side of the street, a little way south of the old meeting-house. And now another perplexity arose. The people living on the outskirts had consented to be taxed heavily for the large and comfortable centre schoolhouse, with a fireplace, and now as they thought, it would be no more than just that they should be allowed to use it as a "noon room" on the Sabbath, where they could warm themselves and chat away the intermission. But the town voted, "Nay." Nor was this all. The dwellers on Spruce Hill became jealous, and in 1 801 a vote was carried in town meeting, "To move the school- house on Spruce Hill to the guideboard near Nathan Waite's, and add four feet to the length, and put it in as good repair as the schoolhouse near the meeting bouse." Previous to this last vote, however, 'and about the time when the new center schoolhouse was completed, having got three schoolhouses more comfortable than the rest, a vote was passed "To divide the town into three school districts, the lines to be Mill river, between the east and center districts, and a line running north and south between Elijah Allis' and Daniel Allis' and between Maf. Phineas Frary's and .Reuben Graves', giving Joseph Crafts, Daniel Allis and Reuben Graves liberty to choose which district they shall belong to." This vote was not at once carried into full, even if it was into partial, efiiect. In 1801 the town voted to build a schoolhouse in the northwest district, 26 x 22 feet, and finish it in imitation of the one in the centre district, "Only twenty lights to a window." The next year the town voted, "To buy the old schoolhouse near Josiah Brown's for a workhouse." No new movements in relation to schools or schoolhouses appear on the records for the next ten years. In 181 1 the .school- house in the Straits was replaced, on the old spot, by a new one '93 i8 X 24 feet, at a cost of one hundred dollars. This house had two fireplaces^ one at each end of the room. The same year the middle district was divided, and two new schoolhouses built, each 20 x 24 feet, one where the north center house now stands, the other near Stiles' corner. In 1813 schoolhouses were built in the southwest and northwest districts. As early as 1824 the families living in Canterbury moved to secure a new schoolhouse for their accommodation, but the town negatived the plan. In 1827 the families living south of Sugar Loaf united and built by subscription a house just on the north line of J. C. Sanderson's land, near where the witch left his print in the ground when he jumped from Sugar Loaf. The next year the town voted to allow tlje Canterbury families their portion of the school money and also to move the Straits school- house to the corner of the proprietor's highway. In 1829 the town voted that the inhabitants of the east district have liberty to build a house for a select school on the land owned by the town, where the old schoolhouse formerly stood. A special effort on behalf of the schools appears to have been made this year, the result of which was the adoption by the town in 1830 of the following rules: Resolved, i. That the boys have the privilege of attend- ing the schools in the summer, till they are ten years old, and the winter schools when they are seven years old. Resolved. 2. That the girls have the privilege of attend- ing the summer schools till they are thirteen years old, and the winter schools when they are ten years old. Resolved, 3. That the southwest district and the east district shall be permitted to send scholars to the several schools at an advanced ratio of age provided that the prudential com- mittee of the district and the superintending committee shall judge the increase of scholars will not injure the school. Resolved, 4. That one-third of the money which each district shall draw from the town, be apportioned for the benefit of the small scholars, and the remainder for the large scholars in winter. Voted, That the school money be divided, the one-half on the district and the other half on the scholar, the ensuing year. In 1832 it was voted to divide the town into three districts for the benefit of large scholars, to be called the east section, the middle section and the west section. And the minor arrangements under this division appear to have been left to the 194 discretion of the school committee. In 1833 the east district was divided, and a schoolhouse built south of Elijah Allis' place. The six districts, into which the town was then divided, remain substantially unchanged to the present day. Select or High School. The question was several times agitated of erecting a building near the meeting-house for a school of higher grade. In 1829 the people of the east part made a move to get such a building there, and the town so far favored the plan as to give them leave to erect a schoolhouse on the town's land, at Bartlett's corner. In 1831 the matter of building a Town house came up, and the town voted, "To raise one hundred and fifty dollars, to be given by the town, together with the town land lying near Justin Morton's barn, to the pro- prietors of a schoolhouse, provided they have a hall in said building sufficiently large to do all the town business in." The scheme did not succeed. In the winter of 1838 several citizens associated and raised the necessary funds, and the next season built a select school- house on West Lane. A school was kept here in the fall and winter of 1839-40 by Addison Ballard of Framingham, then a member of Williams college. This school was maintained for a single term, annually, with a good deal of interest, for a num- ber of years. The building was sold and converted into a dwell- ing house about 1854. In 1 87 1 the Town hall was raised up sufficiently for a sec- ond story and enlarged by the addition of twelve feet to the length. The lower story was divided and finished for the uses of a select school, a town library and town offices. I desire to say a few words relative to the nonacceptance of the farm left to the town by Reuben Belden by his will in 1776. At a meeting held i Dec, 1777, it was voted, "To accept the land given by Reuben Belden," and on the conditions upon which the bequest was made, but they made no attempt to carry out the instructions of the testator. It should be remembered that at this time a mere handful of brave and patriotic men were struggling for national existence and to free themselves and their children from the hated yoke of British tyranny. Money was scarce and business was carried on by the inter- change of commodities. The taxes were paid in grain, pork, beef, etc., the prices of which were fixed by the General Court, and the selectmen had lists of prices that they could allow : wheat, six shillings per bushel ; rye, four shillings ; potatoes, 195 one shilling ; barley, four shillings ; pork, four pence per pound ; beef, three and one-half pence, and so on clear through the list. Continental bills were largely counterfeited by the British, so really they were nearly worthless. All these things combined to prevent our people from attempting to open a school as Mr. Beldeu's will directed. Even the little stipend appropriated for schools was taken to pay Mr. Wells for his services. His pay, to the last farthing, was rigorously demanded. If it ran overdue the interest was also to be paid, school or no school. Continual calls for men to fill the quota of the town, to get substitutes for those who had property, as well as the constantly recurring taxes to meet the constantly recurring wants of the town (perhaps two or more tax levies in a year) was a great burden upon the people. It is no wonder that the town allowed the legacy to lapse. , Then the inventory of the property was but £i^, or $86.66. I/caving this matter, we will speak of other schools in the town at a later period. The first schoolhouse erected in the Straits was on the east side of the road, near the house of Rich- ard Phillips. The counters were so constructed that they were back of the scholars. When the time came for writing they had to turn around facing the walls of the house, but none but the older "scholars were allowed to write. The teacher gave up the time to making pens or in mending the old ones, which were, of course, goose quills, and in examining the writing, seeing how they held the pen and in making suggestions to the pupils. This house was burned. Before building another, the school was kept in a building that had been used for a store by Gad Smith. One of the early teachers was Cotton Nash, son of Joseph Nash. The Canterbury schoolhouse was on the west side of the road and stood partly on land now owned by Walter W. Sander- son and the heirs of J. C. Sanderson. This was built in 1824. It was afterwards sold to Judethan Eaton, who removed to South Deerfield, and he fitted it up for a dwelling house. It was later owned bjf his son, L, L. Eaton. The two center districts each built in i8roabriok school- house. These were built by John and Salmon White and Thomas Crafts. Mr. Crafts made the brick and had them laid into the buildings. That in the north center has been remod- eled, the walls laid higher w^ith gables, while the old ones were covered by a foursquare roof running to a point. 196 The one in the south center district was on ground that, when it frozf, was such that it was wholly unsuited for the pur- pose, and it was considered unsafe. About fifteen years later it was torn down and a new house was built of wood on the hill very near the site of the present house. The writer .well recollects the house vacated in 1825. There was a large fire place on the north and south sides of the room, and the amount of wood consumed was immense. There were seats on the east and west sides, three rows with counters, and small seats in front of the last counter for the young children. ^ The school averaged about sixty scholars. The girls were seated on the west side and boys on the east side. To spell they were arranged on the floor space and they took places, everyone striving to get to the head and often drilled by spelling two or three pages in Webster's spelling ^ook. There were no blackboards for examining our methods of .solving the problems in Adams' arithmetic, the only general exercise in mathematics. The teacher would call upon anyone whom he chose to rehearse the rules as far as given in our books and asking us many questions to test our understanding of the principles involved in the rules. If the answers were not satis- factory another one was told to rise and give his views and if not particularly satisfactory he would sa)', "Laj' aside your -slates and attend to learning the rules." Our schools were divided into two terms of twelve weeks each. The boys were kept at home summers after they were about eight years of age, but went winters until they were about fifteen. Very few had an opportunity to attend a select school until after 1830. About 1838 or '40 the northwest and the south center dis- tricts built an additional room and each winter graded the schools. The older scholars were given superior opportunities . These schools ceased in a few years for the want of scholars. In 1854 the town opened the Town hall for use as a high school and the increased educational advantages were enjoyed by a large number from all parts of the town. The pupils from the west part would hire rooms and bring needed articles for housekeeping and food for the week. These schools were continued for a number of years, afford- ing untold benefits to a great number of scholars. The town built an addition to the Town hall and raised the hall one 197 story higher. The lower portion finished for use as a school- room, a room for the town library, the selectmen's room, etc. Of late years scholars go and come on the railway to Deerfield or Northampton and some few have graduated there. A , better educated class of teachers is required for our schools, and they also have whatever of advantage there may be in having a competent superintendent. I wish here to say that our town has for many years been earnest in its efforts to fur- ther the interests of the schools and has made liberal appropri- ations for their support. But to again recur to the old time studies and the methods of instruction since the writer can recollect, say from 1822 wh^n he was 'five years old. The previous summer we had mastered the alphabet, standing at the side of the teacher who pointed with her penknife to each letter and telling what its name was. After the second year I was furnished with the New England primer, which contained many Bible stories, and the catechism, and a spelling book. These two occupied my time until I was seven years old. I had to learn the catechism and rehearse daily. About every two or three weeks Mr. Wells would come in and catechise us. We had to go out onto the floor and stand in a. row, ten or twelve of us, and the good old man, dressed in knee breeches and long black stockings, morocco shoes with knee and shoe buckles, (apparently silver) with his gray hair braided and tied in a cue with a black ribbon hanging down his back about eight inches, with the ribbon three or four inches lower and surmounted by a black silk frock or mantle open in front, with rather wide sleeves, would question us. He needed no book, as he was perfectly familiar with the questions and answers. Then, for a wonder, I was the best posted in the class, and often had to answer when no one else could or would, and many is the time that the kind-hearted, old man has laid his trembling hand upon my head and said, "James, you will m^e a man that your parents will be proud of." Strange to say, that then I had not a doubt but that every word in that catechism was true and now, though the minds of the young are thoroughly imbued with doctrines pertaining to the trinity, redemption, justification, sanctfication and damna- tion, yet many of us have outgrown these awful tenets warping the minds of many of us. Really the twig was bent only to re- bound eventually. The reading books were ill adapted to the wants of the scholars. The American Preceptor and Scott's Lessons, both unfit for pupils under twelve. Later, when attending win- ter terms, we had for a reading book the First Class Book, and the smaller scholars had Easj- Lessons and the Young Reader, Webster's Speller, Woodbridge's Geography, Murray's Gram- mar and Adams' Arithmetic printed in 1815. The Woodbridge Geography was accompanied by an atlas and was the earliest one I had ever seen — before that we had Morse's and Dwight's. The bulk of our school books would not be tolerated in our schools to-day. I have before me a proprietary rate made for schooling, done for the following persons in Whately and Deerfield, between 16 May and 5 Oct., 1781, being five months complete after the deduction of two absent days, at ye rate of ;^i, 12s, od per month, inclusive of board : Lieut. Tho's Sanderson, 2 scholars at gs, 2d £0 18 4 Joseph Belden, ij^ scholars at gs, 2d o 13 g Benjamin Scott, i scholar at gs, 2d o g 2 Benjamin Smith, i scholar at gs, 2d o g 2 Joel Waite, i scholar at gs, 2d o g 2 Philip Smith, 2 scholars at gs, 2d 0184 These above belonged to Whately and the following from Deerfield : Lieut. David Stebbins, 2 scholars at gs, 2d £0 18 4 Aaron Pratt, 2 scholars at gs, 2d o 18 4 Jonathan Russell, ij^ scholars at gs, 2d o 13 g Benoni Farrand, 2 scholars at gs, 2d o 18 4 Solomon Jepherson, 1% scholars at gs, 2d o 13 g ^8 00 5 This school was probably kept at Canterbury in the house of some one of the people, or possibly at some house in the edge of Deerfield, as the Hon. H. S. AlHs well recalls ihis first year at school. They had a room in what was known as the Stebbins house, where later has lived A. A. Jewett. The old house was a large one, and there he. attended school when four years of age. An effort has been made to establish a new system of school- ing in town, which is to build one large schoolhouse for the accommodation of all the pupils in town and have them trans- ported at public expense to the center of the town, and this to be a central graded school. This is the recommendation not only of _ our school committee, but of your former, as well as 199 present superintendent of schools. For one, I very much doubt whether such a plan could be well carried out, for several rea- sons. The condition of Sunderland is cited as the main argu- ment in its favor. The conditions of Sunderland and Whately are far from be- ing similar. The population of Whately is scattered over a larger extent of territory and much of it hilly and rough. This would cause much unnecessary inconvenience and consequent suffering. It is true at the present time there is a paucity of number of scholars, and it seems more desirable to allow the two west schools to be taken to one schoolroom, and so of the two east at one place. When we consider that the little tender child, of just school age, is compelled to be hurried off through storms and drifting snows and, sick or well, is obliged to remain all day amid suffering, only to get home at a late hour, it seems to me to be a pretty strong inducement for the loving par- ents to dispose of their property and leave the town. When he bought his farm his deed conveyed all the rights, privileges and appurtenances thereto belonging. Among those privileges largely inducing the man to buy, was the nearness of the schoolhouse. Had he for a moment expected that his little loved daughter was to be transported by ever so kind-hearted a man he would never, for an instant, have con- sidered the question of locating in such a locality, and now, after he is compelled to submit to such arrangements, he must feel as though he was deprived of a portion of his actual rights — and for what ? Who is benefited by such a concentration of all the scholars in one building ? Is a better class of teachers to be employed ? Are the dul- lards to be brightened and they induced to renewed efforts. Where I live the schools are all graded. Are the scholars, all of them, any more efficient than those who, like myself, attended the district school ? We then had some bright scholars and some were. Oh, so dull. So it is with our schools here. We had scholars of eight years that were better readers and spellers than many great louts of double the age. Fathers have rights, but con.sider for a moment, the terrible strain to the tender, loving and anxious mother as she thinks of her loved one plodding through drifts and amid the storms, coming home cold and sick. But, having had much to do in school direction in years gone by, I can be classified as an old fogy and so will drop the matter. As there are but few now living in Whately who can recall 200 incidents occurring in tlie schools seventy-five years ago, as well as the methods of teaching, and knowing well the excellent mem- ory of my old-time .schoolmate, Hon. Hubbard S. Allis, I asked him to contribute a sketch for the chapter on education, and I am now in receipt of his paper. Simply promising that the inci- dents he relates have much of historic value, we give the moiety of space for its publication, as a sort of relief to the recital of Simple, tame and not over-interesting matters. Mr. Allis has returned to our own well-loved town in his old age, where we hope he may enjoy his fine residence for a good long time. Whately, Mass., May 7, 1899. Hon. J. M. Crafts, Orange, Mass., My Dear Sir : — You requested me to write out some of the incidents of my school days in Whately, and of the location of the schools and the teachers thereof, within my recollection from 1823 to 1839, the year I left Whately for Rochester, where I resided until 1896. Now, I think you are eighty-two and as I am only eighty, you have two years' more knowledge of Whately early schools than myself; at any rate I used to think you had more brains when we sat together in the old south school, figuring on an old slate addition and subtraction of fractions when we were young kids. I remember all about that school and I had reason to for, between us both, I got the biggest pounding from the teacher that I ever had for my boyish deviltry. It occurred in this way : You made up wads of paper and paissed them under the bench to me and, when teacher's back was turned, I would shy them across the room to the girls, hitting their faces. They would scream out, disturb the school and they would not know who sent them. We worked that dodge several times, and finally I was caught. The teacher came by the desk, took me by the neck, hauled me out of the seat, as you would a trout out of a brook,- cuffed my ears and bent my back, putting my head under his long table filled with his books, inkstands and other traps. I had been in that position about one-half an hour, when my disposi- tion for fun got the better of me, by turning my head towards the girls and by making up faces towards them to make them laugh, etc. I was caught at that, when the teacher's two and one-half ft. ruler 'came down upon my back like a cyclone. I made one jump on purpose, raised my body with extra strength, turning over the heavy table, scattering his books and ink all over the floor. He then went for me like a crazy man and pounded me all around the room. Oh! such a pounding, no scholar ever had in the town of Whately. It cured me of deviltry from that day on. My first recollection of schools I attended was in 1823. My father lived at the Major Sanderson house in Canterbury, oppo- site the shoe shop. The house was burned a few years since. I was sent to school kept in the Stebbins house, standing near the west end of Sunderland bridge. The teacher was Hannah Clapp from Northampton. The scholars I remember were Levi and Emerson Parker, sons of Capt. Asa Parker, William and George Sanderson and Harriet Smith and other children as far south as Frances Belden, for I remember Roxana Belden coming to the Stebbins house school, and she sat beside me. On one occasion she came to school with a new yellow dress and I thought she looked so very nice and pretty, and after that we used to walk hand-in-hand as far as my home. She was a sister of Alfred Belden. Capt. Parker's first wife died 11 April, 1822, and Miss Clapp's school was moved from Stebbins' house to Parker's house, and he married her, how soon after his first wife's death, I do not know, but I know she gave me the first whipping I ever had in school. I had been making some trouble in some way and she shut me up in a large closet, very dark. I yelled loudly to get out and she said I could not until school was over. Now, this closet contained a quantity of walnuts. I threw the walnuts against the door so continually that she could not keep school. She finally let me out, gave me a good whipping, sent me home and father doubled the dose. The marriage of Miss Clapp probably ended scjiool at the Parker house, and a schoolhouse was built between J. C. San- derson's and Dwight Sanderson's houses in 1824. I saw the. building raised, sitting on a board between Diana Sanderson and Harriet Smith, sister of Cutler Smith. I recall an incident that occurred at that time, thus: When the frame was raised, ladders down, etc., the last man down was scolded far not driv- ing in a peg to a brace. .Some man said. "Call Orrin Brown with his axe, he can reach it." Orrin was over six feet tall, and 202 took his axe and at two strokes drove the pin home, and three cheers were given for Orrin. Joseph Brown was the grandfather of Theophilus Brown, and lived in an old house about twenty-five rods south of S. W. Allis' house. I went to school in the new house for a short time, and then we moved to Whately street in 1825, to the place where I now live. The first school I attended after we moved to Whately street was at the north center brick house, which stands there to-day. The teacher -was Fanny Crafts, sister of Cotton, for I remember of her taking all the school children to her home to eat maple sugar. The second school I attended in the street was a private school, kept in a store that stood about where the Town house now stands. This building was afterwards moved to the west side of the street, where Horace Manning now lives, by J. M. Cooley and remodeled. When he went to Springfield, Mr. Temple occupied it. Our teacher was the Rev. Mr. Perkins, afterwards one of the first missionaries to China. He was a rigid disciplinarian, and gave me my first whipping wrongfully. I pleaded with him not to whip me, as I was not the one who did the mischief, but I did not give away the other boy, but took the dose manfully. I made up my mind I would get even with him. About a month after I went to the schoolroom at noon time, put a large bent pin in his big arm chair seat, and when he opened the afternoon school, and sat down in the chair he jumped half over the room, pitching his table and books before him. He never could find out the boy rogue who did it, for that boy's head was close to his slate all that afternoon, wrestling with the mysteries of fractions and, occasionally, seeking his advice to unravel them. S. B. White attended this school, also Albert Sanders, Deacon Reuben H. Belden, Zabina W. Bartlett, Charles D. Stockbridge, Rufus P. Wells, Mary Morton, Experience Wells, Harriet Frary, John H. Bardwell and sisters, and many of the older scholars from other districts. About this time the people north of the old church, this side of Gutter brook, got set off to the south district school, taught by Lydia Allis, afterwards Mrs. Dr. Myron Harwood, who took the place of Salmon White, son of Justice White, who died while a te&cher there, if I am not mistaken. It was a summer school, and I don't think you attended. I think there is no one living now who attended school in that district, except myself 203 and yourself and Mrs. Rufus Dickinson. We children were in- structed by our pious parents in the street, as we passed to and fro from the schools, if we met old Parsons Wells, to form two lines, take off our hats and bonnets, and let him pass through the lane with his chapeau hat, black gown, silk stockings, clasped above his knees with silver buckles, also the same fas- tened his shoes. I also attended a private school kept by a student from Am- herst college, in the basement of Austin Elder's house, on the West Lane. I remember as scholars there, two sons and a daughter of Stephen Clark of West Whately, John Bardwell, Hopkins Woods and sisters, Angenette and Elizabeth Loomis, Sybil and Clarissa Bardwell, daughters of Dr. Bardwell, Expe- rience Wells and Mary Morton, Rufus Wells and Morris Morton and Porter Wells. The next school I attended was a private school, kept by Rev. Mr. MacKinstry, in the hall of the hotel owned by Mr. Bush, who was also the town merchant in the store attached. This was a large and fine school, and many a Whately boy and girl, from sixteen to twenty, from all over the town made great progress under his teachings in their education for a future business life. I remember as scholars from East Whately, George W. Sanderson, Reuben H. Belden, Albert Sanders; from Christian Lane, Elizabeth Loomis ; from West Whately, Stephen Clark's children ; from the center, Hopkins Woods, Morris Morton, John and Charles Bardwell and sisters, Experi- ence Wells, Mary Ferguson and brothers and Mary Morton, My father was one of four or five men that subscribed to build a private schoolhouse which stood on the lot west of the hotel. This was run as a private school for some years and then, for some reason, it was given up, the building sold and it is now the Bennett house on the west end of the lane. I do not recollect of going to that school. I presume the reason was that I was sent to Deerfield academy for two years about that time. I recollect of going around with a subscription paper to get money for a writing school. I succeeded and procured H. G. Knight of Easthampton to give lessons to some seven or eight of us boys in a room in Dr. Bardwell's house, he donating the use of the room., Mr. Knight was afterwards, I think, Lieut. Governor of Massachusetts. I recollect also of doing the same thing for a singing school and procuring Col. Barr for a teacher, and we had a large 264 school and a jolly good time, but I never heard that any of the young ladies turned out Jenny I,inds or the boys famous tenor singers. I know in that role I was a failure. The environment here was so contracted, in regard to music, that I suppose we all fell from grace in that regard. We all fell back into old Ste- phen Clark's and Reuben Graves' style of singing through the nose, after Reuben pitched the tune in church by biting* his tun- ing fork and starting in to praise the Lord with a tenor scream that would have frightened an eagle on top of the high moun- tain in West Whately where he lived. The same old controversy about schools and their location that you and I heard seventj' years ago, is in existence here to- 'day, for at the last Town meeting in March, it was voted, "To raise $6000 for a new schoolhouse, subject to the approval of a special Town meeting, held 29 April," when the vote in March was reversed by a large majority. The first vote would have compelled all the scholars to come to one school in the center. The true course to pursue is to make three districts out of the six now in existence, one to be at the Straits four corners, one in West Whately and one large building at the center for small children and advanced scholars from all over the town. Very truly yours, H. S. ALIvIS. Libraries. It has always seemed to me as strange that the subject of libraries should have escaped the attention of Mr. Temple. While the town has nothing to be overproud of in this direction, yet we deem it of some importance that due atten- tion should be given to so important a matter as a library. So we beg our readers to note carefully what we may say. The first library of which I have any knowlege in Whately was formed sometime between 1790 and '95, perhaps earlier even than 1790. To commence with, each subscriber paid one shil- ling and six pence, and in the original document, which is with- out date, it is written in ancient form as 1-6. This was doubt- less in English money. To show our authority for claiming a date prior to 1800, I find that Abner Dickinson died 28 Sept., 1799, aged seventy-five years, and he was one of the subscrib- ers, so it must have been before his death and qtjite a number died soon after. I will give an exact copy of the names and the amounts credited as paid : 205 LIST OF THOSE WHO PAID ONE SHILLING, SIX PENCE. Rev. Rufus Wells, Capt. Henry Stiles, Joshua Belden, Ivieut. Abel Scott, Eleazer Frary, Jeremiah Waite, Maj. Phineas Frary, Oliver Graves, Jr., Salmon White, Philo Bacon, Moses Graves, Samuel G. Morton, Capt. Salmon Graves, Jehu Dickinson, Elijah Allis, Aaron Dickinson, Moses Munson, Jr., William Mather, Dea. Levi Morton, Salah Graves, Oliver Morton, Gad Smith, Nathan Waite, Salah Scott, John White, Consider Morton, Daniel Morton, Capt. Seth Frary, Solomon Atkins, Asa Sanderson, Graves Crafts, Charles Bardwell, John Smith, Zen as Field, Reuben Graves, Isaac Frary, Samuel Dickinson, Gideon Dickinson, Luther White, Simeon Morton, Samuel Grimes, Thomas Wells, Thomas Marsh, Levi Graves, Joel Monson, Martin Graves. Abner Dickinson, In all forty-seven names of the most prominent people in Whately prior to 1800. The youngest of these was Thomas Wells, born in 1781. After this, about 1820 or perhaps a year or two earlier, another library association was formed of probably a larger con- stituency, and continued until about 1832 or thereabouts, when quite a number of the subscribers refused to be governed by the regulations, and refused to pay annually the stipencj agreed up- on and, after much altercation, they agreed to sell the books at auction. I well recollect of being present at the sale and buying a few books, and I heard Dr. Miron Harwood say at that time, "That this was just the way the old library was sold off at pub- lic auction and that he bought one or more books" (I do not recall how many books he said he bought.) At that time, 1832, there had been many removals from town , and others were going. The next effort was to avail ourselves of the right to establish school district libraries, about 1842 or '43, the state contributing towards the expense. Several of our school districts procured a 2o6 library of standard works. This continued for awhile and the in- terest in these books decreased, as the books were of a different nature from those the young desired to read. The next library was an agricultural library, formed in- i86r. A meeting was duly called and a goodly number of our people gathered in the evening of 7 Nov., 1861, and made choice of Dr. Chester Bardwell as president, Elihu Belden, Esq., as vice president, and James M. Crafts as secretary. A committed of five, con- sisting of Dr. Chester Bardwell, Elihu Belden, Esq., Edwin M. Belden, Elliott C. Allis and James M. Crafts, were chosen to select a list of books to constitute an agricultural library. Each member paid in five dollars to the fund for books, with an annual stipend of one dollar to be invested in new books. The interest continued and much good resulted. At a meeting held after the establishment of the Town library, in 1874., it was voted unanimously, "To place all such books as remained, in the Town library, to be used as town custodians might see fit," and thus ended this agricultural library after a continuance of some fifteen years. It is certainly proper that we should speak somewhat in de- tail relative to the establishment of the Town free library. There had long been a strong desire for the establishment of a library, either by an association of interested citizens or, some- how, by the town. At last, at a meeting held 6 April, 1874, action war; taken on the following article: "To see what action the town will take to establish a Town library and to choose a committee for the same." Under this article the town chose as the committee: Salmon P. White, Seth B. Crafts, David Scott, Samuel C. Wood, Charles F. Pease and Paul W. Field, and they were to appoint a librarian. They outlined the needful steps to be taken and made report to the Town meeting the next March. Then the town appropriated the amount of the dog fund. The first books were bought and were soon in the hands of hungry readers, a room in the Town house being set apart for the storage of the books. This room was intended for the Town clerk's office, but was only used to store the weights and meas- ures and an old trunk or two that contained old papers, valua- tion books and a badlj' mixed assortment of town orders, etc. The sum of the dog fund, often increased by an extra appropri- ation, has been given annually for its support. Aside from this the town has paid the needed expense of the librarian, as well 207 as the expense of repairing and rebinding the books. I can only give the amount of three years' appropriations, for the lack of Town reports, but I ihink they represent about a fair average of the yearly appropriations: For 1885-86, the sum was $155.75 and service of librarian $26, in all $181.75 ! for 1887-88, the sum for both was $142.69; for 1898-99, the sum for both was $199.00. Under the town's fostering care we now have 2,279 volumes, besides numerous public documents. The number of new books added in 1898 was 120 volutaes of the latest works of the best authors, with several standard works, and the intelligent com- mittee will tell you "The patronage of the library increases each year. The library room has been enlarged, giving additional space for at least 2,000 volumes, the floor covered with linoleum and new lamps put in, all of which greatly improves the appear- ance of the place." And now I may be permitted to say in con- cluding this account of the efforts of ovir town's people to have a library commensurate with the wants, not to say necessities of the people of our town — perhaps I shall be excused when I say that but a moiety of our people have ever opposed liberal appro- priations of money for the constant increase of the books and their care — that the library stands to-day as a permanetit fixture of the town, not only as an adjunct in our educational sj'^stem, supplementing, as it does, our schools where the ele- ments of an education are obtained, only to be developed by reading the best thoughts of intelligent writers. To-day it is not unusual to find a large class of our people well informed in current literature and capable of interesting con- versation on topics allied thereto. True, works of fiction form the larger portion of the books read, yet they are often found to contain much of historic value, as well as a refined method of expression, all of which is educational. One more thought presses upon my mind, and that is the fact of a library not being mentioned by Mr. Temple. Yet, when he was settled over the Congregational church, three libra- ries had existed and two of them had run their course and been closed up. And one would be left to conclude that the sources of information of our people were confined to listening to the long-drawn-out discourses of the clergymen and the small and uninteresting county papers. Yet, we had had two comfortable sized circulating libraries, the first dating back to about 1790, and the other to about 181S to '20, started by a fund raised on each share and an annual payment of a stipulated amount. 208 In the first library, each member or shareholder contributed annually the sum of is, 6d English money, so the amount of an- nual collections would be ;^3, los and 6d, or in federal money (calling a pound equal to $3.33) would make not far from about $12 in round numbers. This sum had been annually expended for books up to near the time of its sale. Copies of these books are yet in existence. It is nevertheless true that our schools, though they gave us the primary elements for an education, were largely the hot beds of instilling into the minds of the young, certain theological notions calculated to uphold the dominant order. I am now past fourscore-and-two years, and yet, the impress on my mind still exerts an influence upon my modes of thinking. I left school for summers when I was eight years old. Up to this time, the only study in school had been the New England Primer and Assembly's Shorter Catechism, and we were cate- chised not only by the teachers, but often by the minister, who not only asked the usual questions, but took occasion to impress itiany points upon the scholars. The primer contained twenty-four coarse woodcuts, one, as I recall it, was a picture of the devil. He was represented as having legs like a big rooster, with spurs ; another represented a biblical scene of the driving of a large nail into a man's head; another scene was the burning of John Rogers at the stake, and as a recent writer well says,, accompanied with couplets and triplets as follows : In Adam's fall 1 Zacheus he ?- and did climb a tree We sinned all ) our I,ord to see and others of a similar nature. It is claimed that the primer was of English production. A recent magazine article well says: "They are full of piety of a ghoulish sort, or of the teachings of that stern school of theology to which those men belonged who lived in the idea that they had been ransomed by the sweat of no vulgar agony, by the blood of no earthly sacrifice," for whom "The sun had been darkened and the rocks rent, the dead had arisen and all nature had shuddered at the sufferings of an expiring God." All these things were taught us in the hope that the mind of the young would receive such impressions as would in after •life control our religious belief, doubtless with a commendable purpose, when viewed from their standpoint. So works of fie- 209 tion were deemed of little wortt. and people urged the commit- tees to purchase books that should largely consist of history, biography and travels, with a liberal sprinkling of scientific works. It was soon apparent that these kind of books did not often leave the shelves of the library, aad the committees were obliged to cater to the wants of the readers. The conditions in which we live are changed, our educational system is up with the times. Our new.spapers are now filled with suitable read- ing. Liberal and advanced thought permeates the minds of our people, and their reading must correspond to their advanced wants. So by all means cherish your library, CHAPTER XII. WHATELY IN THE WARS. — THE FRENCH AND INDIAN WAR, I754-1763; THE WAR . OF THE REVOLUTION, T775-1783; THE SHAYS' REBELLION, 1786-1787; THE WAR OF l8l2- 18 14; THE REBELLION OF 1861-1865. Although the war of 1754 antedates the incorporation of the town, yet as permanent settlements had been made, and these families are identified with its social and civil life, and their indi- vidual acts illustrate its public history, there is an evident pro- priety that the war records of the time should be included in the annals of Whately. These earlier- struggles against the encroachments of the French, were a preparation for the later struggle for Colonial independence. The private soldier received a training which fitted him for the post of com-mand. And thus the discipline of the camp and the smell of gunpowder were not new experiences to the Minute Men of '75. As will be seen, several of the men, whose record is given were, at the time of their enlistment, inhabitants of other and distant towns. Some saw the lands on which they afterwards settled, for the first time, when marching to and from the scene of warfare northward and westward, and some were then and continued to be citizens of Deerfield till the south part of that town, on which they were located, was annexed to Whately in 1810. The ages of these soldiers varied greatly and, in some cases, father and son were members of the same company. Ebenezer Bardwell, Sr., was fifty, Gaius Crafts was thirty, Joseph San- derson, Jr., was eighteen. Some were out in a single campaign, - 211 others took part in nearly every expedition during the seven years of active warfare. Although the list may be incomplete, yet even this brief record will help do justice to the memory of many brave men, who gave the flower of their youth to rheir country, and some of whom, through the neglect or inability of the government, failed to receive a proper return for their sacrifices of time, money and health. The scope of this work does not include a history of the causes and progress of these wars, it does not eve^n include an extended account of any single campaign. Indeed, so far as the French war is concerned, our account will be confined to a bare record of the names of those who were at the time, or afterwards became inhabitants of Whately, and a list of the ex- peditions in which each soldier served. Abraham Parker. In Capt. Israel Williams' company, Aug., 1754, to March, 1755. Henry Stiles. In Capt. Ephraim Williams' company at Fort Massachusetts, 23 Sept., 1754. In Capt. Israel Williams' company, 11 Dec, 1755, to 10 March, 1756. In Capt. John Burke's co'Hipany, expedition to Crown Point, 29 March to 30 Dec, 1756. Sergeant in Capt. Isaac Wyman's company, 25 Dec, 1756. to 26 Jan., 1757. Sergeant in Capt. John Burke's com- pany, expedition to Fort William Henry, 12 Feb. to 4 Nov., 1757- Richard Carey. In Capt. Elijah Williams' company, 1755. In Capt. John Burke's company, 2 March to i April, 1757. Philip Smith. In Capt. Elijah Williams' company, 1755. In Capt. William Lyman's company, 10 Sept. to 30 Dec, 1756. Simeon Graves. In Capt. E. Williams' company, 1755. In Capt. William Lyman's company, 10 Sept. to 30 Dec, 1756. Joel Dickinson. In Capt. Lyman's company at Lake George, 1755. Sergeant in same company, 10 Sept. to 30 Dec, 1756. • Samuel Carley. In Capt. Benjamin Ballard's company. Mar. to Oct., 1755, and Dec. 1755, to March, 1756. In Capt. Samuel Howe's company, 1756. In Capt. John Burke's company, ex- pedition to Fort William Henry, Feb. to Nov., 1757. Gaius Crafts. In Capt. Moses Porter's company, expedi- tion to Crown Point, 1 April to 8 Sept., 1756. In expedition to Canada, campaigns of 1758 and 1759. In Capt. Elijah Smith's company, expedition to Crown Poiat, April, 1759, to Jan., 1760. Perez Bardwell. Enlisted at eighteen years old. In expe- dition to Crown Point, 1756. In Capt. John Burke's company, 2 March to i April, 1757. In Capt. Salah Barnard's company. 1757. In same company, expedition to Canada, 1758 and 1759. 212 Corporal in Capt. Barnard's compan}', expedition to Canada, Feb. to Dec. 1760, and in Capt. William Shepard's company, April, 1761, to Jan., 1762. Paul Smith. In Capt. Moses Porter's company, expedition to Crown Point, 1756. In expedition to Canada, 1759. David Graves, Jr. In Capt. Moses Porter's company, expe- dition to Crown Point, 1756. Seth Waite. In Capt. Moses Porter's company, expedition to Crown Point, 1756. In Capt. Elijah Smith's company, expe- dition to Crown Point, April, 1759, to Jan., 1760. Ebenezer Bardwell. Lieutenant in Capt, Moses Porter's company, ex'pedition to Crown Point, 1756, also in Capt. Jona. Ball's company, same year. In Capt. Salah Barnard's com- pany, expedition to Canada, 1757 and 1758. In Capt. John Burke's company, engaged in bringing deserters, from 30 March to 25, Dec. 1759. Ebenezer Bardwell. Jr. In Capt. Salah Barnard's company, expedition to Canada, 1757 and 1758. Joseph Belden, Jr. In Capt. Whitcomb's company, 1756. Nathaniel Sartwell. In Capt. Whitcomb's company, 1756. In Capt. John Burke's company, 1757. Israel Graves. In Capt. Israel William's company, 1756. Salmon White. Corporal in Capt. William layman's com- pany, 1756. Elisha Frary. Drummer in Capt. William Lyman's com- pany, 1756. Abner Dickinson. In Capt. William Lyman's company, 1756. Joseph Byram. In Capt. John Burke's company, 1757. Ensign in Col. Jona. Hoar's regiment, 1761. Ensign in com- mand of Invalid company at Crown Point, Nov., 1761, to March, 1762. Samuel Bardwell, brother of Perez. In Capt. Barnard's company, 1757. In expedition to Canada, 1758 and 1759. Olivef Graves and Nathan Graves. In Lieut. Billings' company, marched for relief of Fort William Henry, 1757. Paul Belden. In Capt. John Burke's company, expedition to Canada, 1759. Silas Smith. In Capt. Burke's company, as above. Jeremiah Waite. In Capt. Salah Barnard's company, expe- dition to Canada, 1760. War of the Revoi.,ution, 1775-1783. — The letters of Thomas Whately and Governor Hutchinson, copied at length in a preceding chapter, have given intimation of an impending struggle between the colonies and the mother country. The original charter of the American colonies were under- 213 stood to guarantee to the people all the rights and liberties of Englishmen. One of the dearest of theserights was, immunity from taxation, except by their own consent, i. e., by their rep- resentatives in Parliament. A.nd, as the colonists had no rep- resentation, they claimed that they were rightfully exempt. And this exemption had not before been called in question. For near one' hundred and fifty years this guarantied privilege had not been disturbed. But after the close of the war with France in 1763, Great Britain found herself burdened alike with debts and with domestic taxes, and, as a measure of relief, the minis- try devised the plan of raising a revenue by impost and other duties, levied on articles of prime necessity to her American subjects. These measures were resisted by the colonies, not so much because the burden first imposed was oppressive, but because the right to raise a revenue in this way implied the right to levy more direct taxes, and thus made the internal management of American affairs subject to the will of Parliament. It was a first move in a course which would undermine their liberties. Remonstrances and petitions and appeals to the king were sent home and had their effect. The first revenue laws were repealed or modified, or allowed to remain inoperative. But the repeal of the Stamp act was accompanied with the passage of an act, declaring "That Parliament has, and of right ought to have, power to bind the colonies in all cases whatsoever." Other plans for taxing the Americans were adopted, and new causes of irritation sprung up, which developed and tested the temper of men on both sides. But what aroused most deeply the )spirit of the colonies was an address to the king, adopted by Parliament in February, 1769, requesting that orders might be sent to the Governor of Massachusetts to transport to England for trial all who should be suspected of treason. This was an unexpected move, and was looked upon as hostile and vengeful. Nothing could be more odious to a freeman, who had all his life enjoyed equal rights in his native land, than the idea of being torn from his country and tried for his life by strangers. The British view of this measure is presented in the letter of Mr. Whately. The American view of this and the measures that immediately followed it, is set forth in well-known declara- tions of the colonial legislatures, in the destruction of the tea in Boston harbor and the war of the Revolution. Massachusetts was the first of the colonies to resist the arbi- 2i4 trary acts of Parliament, and her capital was singled out as the first to receive exemplary punishment. She led the way in devising ways and means of revolution, and bore her full share ill the sacrifices and sorrows of the contest. Although the people of the Connecticut valley were less directly affected by the restrictions on, commerce, and the pres- ence of foreign troops, than the seaboard towns, yet thfe princi- ples involved were felt by all to touch the vital issues of civil life and political liberty. And our people were qtiick to respond to the alarm of danger, and entered with the whole heart into the struggle for independence. In the fall and winter of 1772-73 a plan was originated by the leading patriots of this state, which had a most important bearing on the progress and ultimate success of the revolution, and the subsequent union of the colonies. This plan was the appointment of a central committee of correspondence and inquiry in Boston, and like committees in every town in the province. Similar committees were appointed by Virginia and other colonial assemblies. By this means the counsels and action of the entire people were brought into harmony, and efficiency and strength given to every movement. A circular, accompanied with a pamphlet, wherein "The rights of the colonists, and the infringements thereof," are set forth, was' sent to the inhabitants of the several towns in the state. A copy of this was received by the Whately authorities early in 1773. A town meeting was immediately called, and a Committee of three, Edward Brown, Elisha Frary and Joseph Belden, Jr., was chosen to answer the said letter. The-commit- tee drew up, and forwarded (by vote of the town) the following reply: . Gentlemen: The proceedings of the town of Boston under the present exigencies, we esteem very laudable and worthy of a metropolis. We concur in general with your sentiments in stating the rights of the colonists and province, and of the in- fringements of these rights. We hold fast loyalty to our sover- eign, yet we groan under our burden, but do not despair of re- dress. If the importunity of a poor widow may move an unjust judge to avenge her how much more may we hope for redress by frequent applications to a gracious king. We shall at all times heartily join with you, in all legal and constitutional meas- ures, for the keeping of these inestimable privileges wrested from us, and firmly to secure those that remain. For we are sensible that, should we renounce our liberty and privileges, we should renounce the rights of man, the rights of humanity and, 215 even our duty to God and man. We have no doubts but that the Parliament of Great Britain will hereby understand that 'tis not the discontedness of a faction, but that the whole people are sensible of the burdens they labor under. This letter is indicative of the general popular sentiment. The people were still strongly attached to their sovereign, and had not given up hope of securing redress for their grievances, btit they were ready to stand by their leaders and to defend thteir ancient rights and privileges. In this town, as in other places, the use of tea and most West India goods, had almost entirely ceased. Foreign calicoes and woolens, which had largely taken the place of homespun, were now discarded. The spinning- wheels were restored to their places in the living rooms, the looms were repaired, and the younger girls became ambitious to learn all the mysteries of making and dyeing cloth, and men and women alike returned to the wool and flaxen garments of their grandparents. Great care was taken to increase the number of sheep. The acreage of flax sown was doubled. All projected public improvements were stayed, and family expenses were cut down to the lowest point. Lawsuits were taken out of court and settled, alienated neighbors became friends. 1774. This was a year of active preparation. The central committee of correspondence called for money to help the dis- tressed citizens of Boston, and further the plans of armament and organization. And at a town meeting in Whately, held 21 July, it was voted, "To pay out of the town stock the sum sent for by the committee."' Oliver Graves was chosen deputy to attend the Provincial congress to be holden at Concord the second Tuesday in Octo- ber. Elisha Frary was delegate to the second congress, held at Cambridge, 5 Feb., 1775, Noah Wells and Salmon White went to the third congress, which met at the meeting-house in Watertown the last of May, 1775. During this fall — 1774 — a company of minute men was organized. As was natural, the men who had been trained in the French and Indian war were looked to as best fitted to lead in this new struggle. Lieut. Ebenezer Bardwell, who had seen most military service, was now sixty-eight years old, and Henry Stiles, now in the prime of life and next him in military expe- rience, was selected to command the company. The best men of the town enlisted and took their place in the ranks. At a meeting in December the town voted, "To provide one 2l6 hundred weight of powder, two hundred weight of lead and tw{ hundred flints for the use of the town." 1775. Early in January a committee of correspondence was chosen, consisting of Oliver Graves, Benjamin S\mith, Olivei Morton, Joshua Belden, John Smith, Elisha Frary and Pau Smith. And at the same town meeting it was voted, "To raisi money for the minute men." Voted, "That the minute men be allowed 8d for each hal day spent ; the sergeants, lod; the lieutenants, i2d." Voted, "That the minute men train four half days betweei this and the first day of May next." The I/Exington Ai :- /-^ -r> d 11 «« it T 243 John Brown, aged 42, enlisted Sept., 1862, in Co. H, Eighth Regiment Infantry. Three years men who served in Co. C, 27th Reg. M. V.: Irving B. Crafts, 18, enl. 24 Sept., '61, dis. 31 Mar., 63, sickness. Wm. McCoy, 30, enl. 23 Aug., '61, dis. 30 May, '63, sickness. Arthur A. Waite, 20, enl. 15 Mar., '62, d. Portsmouth, N. C, 27 Jan., '63. Bartholomew O'Connell, 19, enl. 18 Sept., '61, prom, to rst Sergt., 12 June, '63, discharged to re-enlist 23 Dec, '63. Bartholomew O'Connell, 21, re-enl. 24 Dec, '63, killed Kings- ton, N. C, 8 Mar., '65, was in command of his company when killed. Patrick Murphy, 30, enl. 24 Sept., '61, dis. 30 Aug., '63, disa- bility. Patrick Murphy, 32, re-enl. i Dec, '63, died Andersonville, Ga., t6 Mar., '65. Andrew M. Wetherell, 22, enl. 24 Sept., '61, died Anderson- ville, Ga., 20 Aug. Three years men who served in the 21st Reg. Inf. M. V.: Charles R. Crafts, 21, enl. 23 Aug., '61, in Company G, dis- charged r Jan., '64, expiration of service. Charles R. Crafts, 24, re-enl. 2 Jan., '64, in Company G, dis- charged 12 Aug., '64, disability. James L. Waite, 21, enl. 12 Mar., '62, in Co. I, deserted. John Huxley, 24, enl. 3 Mar., '62, in Co. I, dis. 15 Mar., '64. Johft Huxley, 26, re-enl. 15 Mar., '64, in Co. I, transf. to 36th Reg., transf. to 56th Reg., dis. 12 July, '65, expiration of service. David Amell, 18, enl,. 7 Mar., '62, in Co. E, d. 23 Aug., '62. James I^yndon, 19, enl. 26 Feb., '64, in Co. I, transf. to 36th Reg., transf. to 56th Reg., dis. 12 July, '65, expiration of service. Three years men who served in the 37th Reg. Inf. M. V.: Chauncey Waite, 33, enl. 21 July, '62, Co. P, died of wounds, Wilderness, Va., 27 June, '64. Charles S. Bardwell, Sergt., 26, enl. 22 July, '62, Co. P, prom. 2d Lieut. 20 June, '63, ist Lieut. 15 May, '64, acting Capt., Sept., '64, died at Winchester, W. Va., 6 Oct., '64, of wounds received in battle 19 Sept. Stephen G. Stearns, 21, enl. 22 July, '62, Co. P, dis. 21 June, '65, expiration of service. Nehemiah J. Tilden, 42, enl. 22 July, '62, Co. K, died at White Oak Swamp, Va., 28 Dec, '62. Henry Amell, 23, enl. 22 July, '62, Co. P, dis. 21 June, '65, ex- piration of service. Luther G. Stearns, 28, enl. 22 July, '62, Co. P, dis. 21 June, '65, expiration of service. 244 Samuel E. Sanderson, i8, enl. 22 July, '62, Co. F, dis. 21 June, '65, expiration of service. Ernest A. AUis, 19, enl. 22 July, '62, Co. F, dis. 10 Mar., '63, sickness. John F. Pease, 21, enl. 21 July, '62, Co. F, dis. 21 June, '65, expiration of service. Edgar W. Field, 18, enl. 21 July, '62, Co. F, died Anderson- ville, 15 Aug., '64. Edward E. Sanderson, 24, enl. 21 July, '62, Co. F, dis. 9 June, '65. Orange Bardwell, 19, enl. 23 July, '62, Co. F, killed, battle of the Wilderness, Va., 6 May, '64. Austin A. Waite, 19, enl. 23 July, '62, Co. F, dis. 21 June, '65, expiration of service. Frederick A. Farley, Sergt., 30, enl. i Aug., '62, Co. F, prom. 2d Ivieut., 21 May, '65, dis. i July, '65. Robert Brown, 18, enl. 10 Nov., '63, Co. F, transf. to 2otli Reg. Inf., 21 June, '65, dis. 28 July, '65. Charles H. Walker, 18, mustered 23 Nov., '63, Co. H, dis. 2 May, '65, disability. Henry M. Wood, 20, mustered 9 Oct., '64, unassigned, dis. 28, Aug., '65, expiration of service. Three years men who served in the loth Reg. Inf. M. V. : William A. P. Foster, 24, enl. 17 Aug., '61, Co. C, transf. to 37th Reg., dis. 31 Aug., '64, expiration of service. " Dwight Morton, 33, enl. 13 July, '63, Co. C. Frank D. Bardwell, 20, enl. 28 Aug., '62, Co. H, dis. i Jtily, '64, expiration of service. Had arm shattered in first day's fight in the Wilderness, Virginia. Three years men who served in the 17th Reg. Inf. M. V.: Henry R. Sanderson, 21,' enl. 11 April, '62, Co. G, dis. 5 Sept., '62, disability. Wm. T. Parks, Sergt., 26, mustered 17 Nov., '64, Co. D, dis. 22 July, '65. Three years men who served as indicated : Sylvester R. Walker, 40, enl. 20 Nov., '61, Co. C, 31st Reg. Inf., dis. 31 Aug., '63, disability. Henry R. Sanderson, Corp., re-enl. 18 Feb., '64, Co. C, 57th Reg. Inf., dis. 3 Dec, '64, disability. Henry D. Smith, 21, enl. 8 Aug., '62, Co. G, istMass. Cavalry, dis. 31 Oct., '64, expiration of service. William A. Pearson, enl. 12 Nov., '63, Co. C, ist Mass. Heavy Art., transf. to Navy, 28 April, '64. Foster Meekins, Sergt., 31, enl. 22 Jan., '62, Co. F, 34th Reg. Inf., dis. 16 June, '65, expiration of service. Dwight L. Dickinson, 19, enl. 31 July, '62, Co. G, 34th Reg. Inf., dis. 16 June, '65, expiration of service. 245 Alonzo J. Hale, 26, enl. 4 Jan., '64, 5th Battery Wght Art., dis." 12 June, '65, expiration of service. Samuel S. Smith, 40, re-enl. 25 June, '64, Co. E, 57tli Reg. Int., dis. 30 July, '65, expiration of service. John Brown, 43, re-enl. 25 Jan., '64, Co. E, 57th Reg. Inf., d. Andersonville, Ga., 12 Oct., '64. Franklin E. Weston, 21, enl. 22 Nov., '61, Co. B, 31st Reg. Inf., dis. 22 Nov., '64, expiration of service. William R. Waite, 24, enl. 5 Jan., '64, Co. B, 32d Reg. Inf., killed, Petersburg, Va., 18 June, '64. Three years men, recruits credited to Whately, whose place of birth and residence are unknown : James Barrett, 38, enl. .21 July, '64, 28th Reg. Inf. M. V. Alfred Micollete, 21, enl. 21 July, '64, 28th Reg. Inf. M. V. William Whiting, 21, enl. 8 Oct., '64, Co. B, 55th Reg. Inf. M. v., dis. 29 Aug., '65, expiration of service. John Doherty, 42, enl. 12 Jan., '64, Co. E, 56th Reg. Inf. M. v., died at Boston, 10 Feb., '64. James Anderson, 21, enl. 25 Feb., '64, Co. K, 56th Reg. Inf. M. v., dis. 4 Sept., '65, disability. Charles W. Ellis, 19, enl. 25 Feb., '64, Co. K, 56th Reg. Inf. M. v., dis. 16 June, '65. Jacob Nelson, 24, enl. 25 Feb., '64, Co. K, 56th Reg. Inf. M. v., dis. 15 June, '65. William Tassell, 24, enl. 25 Feb., '64, Co. K, 56th Reg. Inf. M. v., deserted 20 April, '64. Joseph Perro, 23, enl. 10 Feb., '64, Co. I, 57th Reg. Inf. M. V., dis. 30 July, '65, expiration of service. John Ryan, 28,' enl. 30 Nov., '64, Co. D, 24th Reg. Inf. M. V., dis. 20 Jan., '66, expiration of service. David Sheilds.. 18, enl. 3 June, '64, Co. I, 19th Reg. Inf. M. V., dis. 30 June, '65, expiration of service. James Prince, 19, enl. 30 June, '64, Co. G, 20th Reg. Inf. M. v., dis. 12 June, '65. Thomas Doody, 20, enl. 30 June, '64, Co. I, 20th Reg. Inf. M. v., died of wounds, i Oct., '64. I^ewis Bushey, 20, enl. 13 July, '64, Co. K, 20th Reg. Inf. M. v., dis. 28 July, '65, expiration of service. Charles Williams, 25, enl, 31 Oct., '64, 15th Battery I/ight Art., deserted i Jan., '65. Charles Toomey, 31, enl. 26 Aug., '64, Co. B, 2d Reg. Heavy Art., dis. 26 June, '65, expiration of service. George Shannon, 19, enl. 30 Dec, '63, Co. D, 2d Reg. Cavalry, deserted 23 Feb., '65. Julius Schneider, 23, enl. 2 Jan., '64, 2d Reg. Cavalry. Anton Braun, 33, enl. 19 Feb., '64, 3d Reg. Cavalry, deserted May, '64. Richard F. Stanton, 25, enl. 29 Jan., '64, Co. B, 5th Reg. Cav- alry, dis. 31 Oct., '65, expiration of service. 246 John Stewart, 26, enl. 29 Jan., '64, Co. B, 5th Reg. Cavalry, deserted 20 May, '64. Frank Strotliers, 24, enl. 24 Feb., '64, Co. F, 5th Reg. Cavalry, dis. 31 Oct., '65, expiration of service. Robert Robinson, 25, enl. 20 Oct., '64, 5th Reg. Cavalry. John Choiswell, 41, enl. 25 Oct., '64, Veteran Reserve Corps. James B. Kennedy, 20, enl. 31 Oct., '64, Veteran Reserve Corps. Charles Robinson, 20, enl. 21 Oct., '64, Veteran Reserve Corps. Thomas McDonald, 22, enl. 14 June, '64, 27th Reg. Inf. M. V. Names of Whately men who were in service as indicated. Most of them enlisted from other states, but they deserve a place in our annals : Moses W. Jewett, enl. for three years, 20 Aug., '61, in Co. B, 6th Conn. Vol., transf. 22 Feb., '63, to Co. D, ist U. S. Art. ; re-enl. for three years, 4 Feb., '64, dis. 4 Feb., '67, expiration of service. Was in twenty-five engagements, be- ginning at Hilton Head, S. C, and ending 9 April. '65, with the surrender of Gen. I^ee. Henry A. Brown, Sergt. , 24, enl. for three years from Northamp- ^ ton. 21 June, '6r, in Co. C, loth Mass. Reg. Inf., prom. 2d Lieut., 29 Sept., '62. Frederick R. Brown, 30, enl. for three years from Boston, 3 Nov., '63, in Co. G, 12th Mass. Reg. Inf., died Culpepper, Va., 17 Jan., '64. Francis C. Brown, enl. from Rockford, Winnebago Co., 111., in Co. G, 74th 111. Reg. Inf. James E. Brown, enl. in Co. C, 93d Reg. Ohio Inf., served three years. Was taken prisoner, escaped, was re-taken, and held eighteen months at Andersonville, Ga., and Florence. Henry A. Dickinson, 21, enl. for nine months from Hatfield, II Oct., '62, in Co. K, 52d Reg. Mass. Inf., died Baton Rouge, La., 22 March, '63. Oscar F. Doane, 23, enl. for two years, 21 May, '61, from Gaines, N. Y., Co. H, 27th Reg. N. Y. Vols., dis. 31 May, '62, re-enl. for three "years, 14 Dec, '63, Co. C, 8th Reg. N. Y. Heavy Art., killed on the picket line in front of Petersburg, Va., 22 Nov., '64. Lucius Allis, 21, enl. for three years, 23 Feb., '65, from Marl- boro, in Co. C, 31st Reg. Mass. Inf., died. Mobile, Ala., 23 June, '65. Dwight W. Bardwell, 21, enl. for three years from Deerfield, 8 Oct., '63, Co. F, 2d Reg. Mass. Heavy Art., died 7 Dec, '64, Newbern, N. C. Wells Clark, 18, enl. for three years, from Hatfield, 26 Dec, '6[, in Co. G, 31st Reg. Inf. M. V., re-enl. 17 Feb., '64, died of wounds, 23 May, '64, New Orleans, La. AlvahS. Frary, 18, enl. '62, died 23 July, '63, at Vicksburg. A list of recuits, mostly colored men, to fill our quota at Boston: 247 Henry R. -Egtion, 6th Reg., colored. Duncan R. Morrill, James Stanton, Alexander Ross, William Hill, Ambrose McKenna, William M. Shaw, Edward Coburn, James Gorman, John Stewart, 5th Cavalry. William Hill, ist Battery Heavy Artillery. Alexander McDonald, 59th Reg. These men cost the town from $125 to $175 each, the latter sum being paid for the larger proportion of them ; and nine other men, previously mentioned, enlisted on the same terms. CHAPTER XIII. I^OCAI, INDUSTRIES. The meclianical industries of every locality are always im- proved where suitable facilities are furnished for water power. This see'ms to be the most natural and easily acquired source for the encouragement of mechanical work of all kinds, and our early settlers seemed to fully appreciate the advantages to them of the proper improvement of the town by utilizing the several privileges afforded for the erection of mills on the West brook. This stream rises in Conway and enters Whately at its ex- treme northwestern limit and runs through the western part of the town in a southeasterly direction until it falls into the Capa- wong, or Mill river, some fifty rods east of Chestnut Plain street. In this distance, of some over three and a half miles, it falls nearly, or quite, 350 feet, and in this distance fourtefen privileges have been improved first and last, while other oppor- tunities exist that have never been improved. Those that have been used are said to average seventeen feet fall; The largest fall is at the one we designate as No. 13, where a forty feet fall is obtained, and if this was conveyed by a conduit pipe to the level, a fall of 125 feet, at least, could be obtained. This stream is formed by the union of Avery brook, the western branch, and Sinkpot brook, the eastern branch, a half mile or so in Conway and from there it takes the name of West brook. Into it flow a number of smaller brooks and many small runs furnished by, springs. The largest of these brooks has long been known as Harvey's brook. This rises in Wil- liamsburg and is of such magnitude as to afford considerable 249 water power. Mr. Harvey used it for years in his mill, or stop, where he carried on quite a business. Other brooks come in from Willidmgburg way, while on the north side we have Todd's brook and Poplar Hill brook, both rising in Conway and flow- ing southerly unite with West brook. On Poplar Hill brook old Mr. Moses Munson and his son, Joel Munson, built a mill, or shop, where they manufactured cider mill machinery of wood, consisting of the needed screws and beam for pressing and the nuts for grinding the apples, and many other articles, as cheese presses, chairs, cofifins, etc. The hills bordering the West brook, which form its water shed, are somewhat .steep and this causes, in times of heavy rains, sudden rises of the water and sometimes damage. Beginning up the stream, the following is the list of the several privileges that have been occupied and, as near as may be, the dates when first occupied and the purpose, or use, con- templated and, as far as we can, the subsequent owners. The numbers prefixed are arbitrary and are used for the sake of con- venience in referring to them : No. I. A sawmill was built by Dexter Morton, south from the house of Rufus D. Waite some fifty rods, on the Dry Hill road, about 1830. After the death of Mr. Morton, the farm was sold off in sections and the mill property was purchased by Elliot A. Warner. No. 2. On the West brook, Reuben Jenney and his son, Reuben, Jr., bought 26 May, 1816, this privilege where had long been carried on the blacksmith business, with a trip ham- mer attachment, by James Cutter, but who built it I do not know. For many years Elisha A. Jenney, son of Reuben, Jr., has used it for wood turning. No. 3. This is not on West brook, but a tributary of West brook that comes down from Williamsburg, often called Har- vey's brook. On this Elihu Harvey built a large shop that had been used for various purposes, for the manufacture of broom handles, brush handles and a variety of wood turning, garden rakes, saw-sets, etc. Then for a husk mill and, after the death of the Harvey family, Lieut. Oscar W. Grant bought and used it as a repair shop. It was burned in 1883. No. 4. A mill was built on the Harvey brook, near the house of Elisha A. Jenney, but then owned by Ashley Smith. Here, about 1828 or '29, Hiram Smith carried on the manufacture of many implements of iron and steel ma- 250 chinist tools, etc. This was afterwards used by Thomas Nash to manufacture satinet cloth. It was burned about 1850 and never rebuilt. No. 5. This was occupied long before Jonathan Waite owned it. Who built it I do not know, but Nathaniel Moore and his son, John, manufactured spinning wheels and many other arti- cles here as early as 1792. As Capt. Seth Bardwell's mother was a daughter of Nathaniel Moore, and as Capt. Bardwell well knew of his grandfather's ownership, he must have written up these industries for Mr. Temple. The Moores sold out to Pliny Merrick, the clothier, 22 Jan., 1795, also a house known as the Elijah Sanderson house. In 1823, Capt. Seth Bardwell bought it and carried on cloth dressing until 1829, when he commenced manufacturing woolen cloth, with power looms, starting with four. He sold, in 1833, to the Nashes. It has long been owned by Sumner Smith and his heirs, and used for the manufacture of cabinet ware and cane. On the south side of the brook, at No. 5, Nathan Starks had a blacksmith shop, with a power trip hammer, after him James Cutter, then Solomon Graves and another, whose name I don't recall. Elijah Sanderson had wood turning, making wagon hubs, broom handles, and doing a general wheelwright business. Nathan Starks probably occu- pied his blacksmith shop here as early as 1784, or earlier. He removed to Williamsburg about 1816. No. 6. A sawmill was built about 1765 by Edward Brown and sons. About 1792, I,ieut, Noah Bardwell, Asa Sanderson and Moses Munson, Jr., bought the property and run it for the sawing of lumber. Later Rufus Sanderson owned it, then Luther Sanderson, then Charles E. Bardwell and now, I think, Arthur A. Atkins is operating it. No; 7. Moses Munson, Jr., built a gristmill here as early as 1784, and had a shop in which he manufactured a variety of wooden implements such as vises, cheese presses, chaise springs and other materials. In 1806, Dea. James Smith bought the property, and the gristmill was run until about 1830. An addi- tion was built and the power was used in the manufacture of bits, gimlets and similar goods, for about ten years, employing ten or twelve hands. Since then his son, J. R. Smith, has put in a planing machine and used the plant for general jobbing work. In 1875, Asa T. Sanderson bought the property and C. A. Covin manufactured basket rims and, while thus occupied, the old mill was burned. 23i No. 8. About twenty or twenty-five rods down the stream, Capt. Amos Pratt built a clothier's shop before rSoo. The ma- chinery was moved, about 1829, up to No. 5. Since then the power has not been used. It has always been claimed that the first wool carding and rolls in town were made at this place. This was a great improvement, as every housewife spun her yarn for all her household wants. The statement that it was moved to No. 5, 1 have some doubts about, as I well recollect that when Justin R. Smith was married, he lived from 1831 to about 1837 in that old mill, altered into a house. It is probable that Capt. Seth Bardwell bought and moved the machinery to No. 5. It seems as though the building was wrecked at the time of a great freshet and then pulled down. No. 9. Luther Warner, an uncle of Elliot A., built a mill, in 1824, on the line of the new road built up the brook. He probably built his house and mill about 1827. The mill was used for several years for the manufacture of carpenters' bits and augers. Then it passed into the hands of Samuel B. White. In 1849, George C. Holden hired the mill of Mr. White and made woolen yarn and satinet cloth, and then Davis Graves, a great-grandson of Dea. Nathan Graves, rented the property and made woolen cloth. It is now owned by Charles A. Covill, who runs a sawmill and makes rims for a Northampton basket factory. No. 10. In 1833, Capt. Seth Bardwell, in company with Levi Bush, Jr., and David Wells, built a woolen mill on this privilege. It had ten looms. This was burned in 1839, and Capt. Bardwell rebuilt the factory and run twenty looms. This fell into the hands of Henry L. James, who operated it until it was burned in March, 1872, and has never been rebuilt. No. II. Lieut. Noah Bardwell built an oil mill, about 1780, which was used for this purpose until about 1805, when a flaS; dressing machine was put in. Aside from this, some iron casting was done here, probably by Charles Bardwell, a son of Lieut. Noah Bardwell, before his removal to Stafford, Conn. A new building, owned by Capt. Seth Bardwell, was built near the site of the oil mill and rented to a firm for making fine cut tobacco. They used Kentucky tobacco. Then Capt. Bardwell made wool yarn, and then fitted it up to make files and to cut over old ones. It was burned in 1877. No. 12. Hiram Smith first occupied this privilege about 1848, where he had lathes for wood turning, then later it was 252 used as a husk mill. It has been used as a cider mill, and now as a gristmill by Hafvey Moore and son. No. 13. This is the best privilege on the brook, having a fall of about forty feet. A sawmill and gristmill were built here by Reuben Belden of Hatfield, as early as 1767. After his de- cease, in 1776, these mills passed into the hands of his cousin, Samuel Belden. About 1792, a company was formed, of which Col. Josiah Allis was the head man, and they bought of Samuel Belden the mills. At that time the general government was looking for a place to build an armor5' for the manufacture of firearms and, for a time, it was thought to be a sure thing that this privilege would be purchased, but Springfield was finally taken. Col. Allis died in April, 1794. The property was sold, about 1798, to Isaac Frary and it is thought that he run the mills awhile before he purchased. They have since been owned by Maj. Wm. Hale, Dea. David Saunders, Foster Y. Warner, then by Charles and P. M. Wells and now by Dea. Samuel Wilder and son. The mills were wrecked by a freshet about 1875. No. 14. This is the site of a gristmill built by Charles Wells and Justin Waite. Mr. Waite sold out his share* to P. M. Wells and the Wells brothers carried on an extensive busi- ness of from $20,000 to over $30,000 per year. Wells brothers sold to Dea. Samuel Wilder and son about 1885. No. 15. This site has had a great number of owners and many kinds of business has been carried on here. Stephen Orcutt had a clothier's shop here about 1805. Then Hannum & Taylor had a shop for cloth dressing and wool carding, in 1810. Mr. Fairman was in the same business from 1820 to '26. Mr. Cowan continued the business and was here for several years. In 1832, a new factory was built and used as a pocket comb factory. This was commenced by Col. R. B. Harwood, Wright Boyden and Josiah Allis. After a few years they sold out and it was used for the manufacture of woolen goods by Buf- fum & Harding, and afterwards owned by Justin Brown, a Mr. Sykes and Justus Starks. It was burned about 1840. It was afterwards bought by Justin Waite, who built the present plan- ing mill. He was succeeded by his son, Frank J. Waite, and it is now owned by I,uman S. Crafts who runs a planing mill, a general repair shop and builds new wagons and sleds, with needed blacksmith work, and makes about 1500 to 2000 barrels of cider a year. 253 No. i6. This was the place used by Reuben Belden of Hatfield for his iron works, and it stood about where Charles Potter's barn was built. This was quite a large establishment. He not only used iron ore and smelted it here, but did a large and profitable business by pounding scrap iron into bar iron: When he died, in 1776, the iron works were apprai,'?ed at ^^240, while his gristmill and sawmill, on No. 13, were inventoried at ^102. "In 1789, the town laid a road beginning at Hatfield line at West brook bridge, running north from said bridge one rod, then west two and one-half degrees, north fifteen rods, then west thirty-one degrees, north seven rods to the northeast cor- ner of the mill, then north five rods to the top of the. hill for the convenient turning of teams." The mill here alluded to was the building used for grinding the grain used for making rye gin. This was carried on for some years by a company formed for that purpose, consisting of Gen. Seth Murray, Gen. Dickin- son, Seth Bardwell, Samuel Belden, Aaron Dickinson and one other. They sent to Providence, R. I., and obtained a compe- tent foreman, Mr. Abial Harding, formerly of Whately, for that purpose. This was said to be the first gin distill ety in Massachusetts. It was here that Abial Harding's son, Ches- ter Harding, commenced sketching the profiles of parties bring- ing loads of rye, upon the sides of the mill. He was, in after years, a renowned portrait painter. I have heard my father, who was intimately acquainted with Mr. Harding, speak of these offhand portraits, drawn on the rough boards of the mill, as being neatly done. After these industries had been given up, Stephen Orcutt carried on a pottery on the same premises, grinding his clay by water power. The water was brought several rods in boatd troughs about fifteen inches wide and deep, and elevated tea or twelve feet on trusses. These were in use as late as 1830 by the Waites, who succeeded Orcutt. Isaac Frary's bark mill was what we used to Call the lower mill on No. 13 that could only run while the tipper mill was in use, as it used over the water, that ran the upper mill. It was built for grinding bark for the tanneries. William Wing at one time ran Orcutt's clothier's or carding mill on shares. Hopewell brook. The only valuable privilege oii this brook, or combination of streams flowing from springs all alOflg under Hopewell Hill, was the site of the Belden mill. About 100 years ago, in 1798, Joshua Belden started in a rude way a saw- 254 mill. This was not used many years. In 1850, Charles D. Stockbridge started here a factory for making paste blacking and also, at a later time, a factory for making stockings and employed at least ten or fifteen girls, perhaps more. After this, Elihu Belden used this factory for the preparation of colors for fresco painting, and had ovens for baking the umber and sienna, as this changed the colors. Roaring, brook. Saw and gristmills were early built on this stream by Adonijah Taylor, George Sheldon says, "before 1766." This was a great accommodation to those living in the north part of Whately which, when those were built, was in Deerfield. There was at first a gristmill some ways up the stream, while the sawmill was near his house, and now the saw and gristmill are contiguous, near the house of George E. San- derson. Eli Sanderson had a cloth dressing and wool carding shop still further down the stream. Poplar Hill brook. Joel Munson, usually called "Silver Joel," to designate him from Joel, the son of Reuben, built on this brook a .shop in which he and his father worked a portion of their time, in making cider mill screws of wood, and also the blocks, or nuts, that crushed the apples. These screws were about four and a half feet long, and six or eight inches in diam- eter. Also the beams, some eighteen to twenty inches or more square, made of hard maple. They also made coffins and many other things, as plows, ox yokes, etc., etc. Tanneries were generally built where there was a small stream or brook. Paul Belden, before the organization of the town, had built on the road leading from Samuel Wells' house to the Baptist meeting-house, a tannery, and used it until his removal, about 1795, to Brookfield, Vt. After he left, I think George Rogers used it. Dea. Thomas Sanderson built a tannery on the east side of Canterbury road, and also carried on an extensive shoemaking business during the Revolutionary war, or until his removal to Indian Hill in 1803. He was suc- ceeded by his son, Maj. Thomas, and he by his son, John Sanderson. Solomon Atkins, Jr., built a tannery on Gutter Hill brook, just west of the bridge, and used it many years. He was succeeded by Stalham Allis, both in the tannery and shoe business, and Mr. Allis was followed by Dexter Frary, who carried on the business on a larger scale than his predecessors. Asa Sanderson was a tanner and shoe- maker and, as he bought the Noah Field property in 1783, he 255 probably started a tannery soon after his removal to the west part. I well recollect his tanyard and shoe shop as early as 1825. Graves Crafts had a small tannery in connection with his shoemaking business. Capt. Eleazer Frary carried on a tannery near where he built the house now owned by Lincoln B. San- derson. Phineas Graves lived where C. R. Chaffee does now and was a tanner and shoemaker, his tannery being west of Mr. Chaffee's barn. Stephen Orcutt was a tanner and shoemaker and was always doing something at it, but not as a regular business. Blacksmiths. John Lamson, in 1773 or '74, had a shop near the Samuel Lesure place and continued it until 1791. About the same time a blacksmith shop was built at the Straits, but by whom occupied I have never learned. Jehu. Dickinson built, near his house, a large shop and here his son, Eurotus, David Graves and several others learned the trade, about 1798 to 1803. He started in business as early as 1782. David Cook had a shop, I think in the Straits about 1792, and was in town about four years. Oliver Morton, Jr. , built a nice, commodious shop near his house in 1798. Among his apprentices was Levi Gunn, who removed to Conway. The Morton shop has had many occupants, the most prominent being Leander Clark and Horace B. Fox, the latter carrying on the business there a good many years. Isaac Chapman had a shop near his residence on the Easter road. Roswell Train had a shop near his house on Poplar Hill road, about 1807. James Cutter, in 1804, probably succeeded Nathan Starks, who had a blacksmith shop at (the city) West Whately, with trip hammer, and used the West brook for his power. This shop was bought by Reuben Jenney Jr., Mr. Cutter selling to him and removing to Hatfield, about 1818 or '20. Israel Scott, who was born in 1766 and lived on the Capt. Fay place, had his shop near his house, between that and the house of Benjamin Cooley. Justin Smith had a shop in the Straits. S. W. Fox run a shop at the Straits some years ; Michael Kennedy, several years. At Claverick, Chester Wells opened a shop south of Perez Wells' house, about 1803, and Benjamin Larrabee continued it until after 18 16. Mr. Wells removed to Chestnut Plain street, bought the William Cahill place and carried on an extensive bu.siness with Leander Clark, his brother-in-law. Later a syndicate of citizens built a shop, in the rear of the Town house, which has been 256 run by several different parties, among them we will name Henry D. Smith, son of Col. Oliver, who, after his service in the army, came here and occupied that shop. Herbert L. Bates succeeded him, and later Fred L. Graves. Arthur I^. Atkins opened a shop in Christian Lane, and later H. L. Bates run it for several years. Now owned by Fred L. Graves. This does not include all of the trade, as it is well known that S. W. Fox had a shop on Lover's Lane. Several of the Barnards were blacksmiths, as was probably Luther Warner. Hatters. A hatter named Amasa Smith, came to Whately not far from 1785 and worked at his trade here six or seven years. In 1799, Benjamin and Joseph Mather ha.d a shop at the southeast corner of the C. R. Chaffee lot, on Chestnut Plain street. Joel, Benjamin and Osee Munson had a shop south of the southwest schoolhouse as long ago as I can remem- ber. It was an old. building and has been gone more than sixty years. It was a two-story building and, if I recollect aright, was painted red. Jerry Allis learned his trade there about 1798 to 1803. Then it was common to carry all the furs to this shop and they made the hats on shares or bought the furs, as one chose. Brick Making. In 1778, the town voted, "That John Locke have liberty to make brick in the road near the house of, Capt. Henry Stiles." Daniel Morton and Lewis Stiles carried on the business from 1782 to about 1795, and then Daniel Mor- ton and Capt. Henry Stiles were in company in 1799. After this Daniel Morton continued the business until 1827. Thomas Crafts and John White made brick together and built two schoolhouses of brick in 18 10, one for each of the center dis- tricts. Justus Crafts and Chester Wells were probably in com- pany with Capt. Luke Wells, on Capt. Wells' land, near Mill swamp. Oliver Dickinson made biick on the West side of Chestnut Plain road, below the Whites, for several years. About 1832, Levi Bush, Jr., made brick on the south side of the crossroad, I think, about two years, each year a kiln of about 200,000. His foreman was Jehiel Barber. Since then a smaller quantity has been made at the Drain Tile works on James M. Crafts' place, ea,st of the Connecticut River road. PoTTBRY Ware. In 1797, Stephen Orcutt commenced the manufacture of common brown earthenware. Prior to his com- 257 mencing this business Jonathan Pierce had a shop just south of the line in Hatfield. Orcutt built the place since known as the Lem. Waite place. It was here where the first pottery was established. This was carried on for many years by the sons of Mr. Waite. About 1802 Thomas Crafts commenced in the pot- tery business near where Lyman A. Crafts now resides, but removed it to Claverack in 1806, and was interested as owner or in company with others until 1847, manufacturing common brown earthenware until 1821. From then until 1832, he kept six or eight hands at work making black teapots to the value of some $4000 per annum. He remodeled his shops and commenced, in 1833, the manufacture of stoneware, continuing fifteen years; then James M . Crafts and brother continued the business some years. They were followed by E. A. Crafts in company with D. D. and I. N. Wells, and they by Martin Crafts, and it was closed out entirely about i860. Quartus Graves had a pottery where Fred L. Graves now owns, for about ten years. A pot- tery was built on the Quinn place — who built or started it I never knew — but Heman Swift was the last occupant. Mr. Orcutt, in company with Obadiah and I/uke Waite, started a stoneware pottery south of the McClelan place, on land now owned by Samuel Wilder. This was never successful for rea- sons which I need not relate. Sanford S. Perry & Co. built a pottery and made black teapots, not far from 1820. This too, was not run on strictly business principles and only continued about three years. The shop was bought by Simeon Reed, moved from the lot now owned by Mrs. M. W. Jewett and used by him for a wheelwright shop. It is now owned by David Cal- lahan. A small pottery was built on the Israel Wells place, then owned by Thomas Crafts, and occupied first by Justus Crafts, about 1825, and afterwards by Rufus Crafts. About 1831, Justus Crafts built a house on Claverack, north of the Allen Belden place, and used one end of it for a pottery. Ralph E. Crafts built a small pottery on land of Thomas Crafts, which was used for making flower pots, burned in 1843, and he re- built, in 1844, on his own land. This was afterwards used for a broom shop. At that time the pottery business added much to the town, giving employment to a good many men, there being twenty-one native born potters in town, aside from many journeymen, but now there is not a single one of that occupation here. 258 Carriages and Wagons. Two-wheeled carriages, or chaises, came in use before those with four wheels, but they were not made in Whately. Rev. Rufus Wells owned the ftrst chaise in town as early as 1784; Dea. Thomas Sanderson had one very soon after. Prior to this, the only mode of travel was either on foot or horseback, the roads not being worked to per- mit any other method of travel, except on routes from one large town to another. It is said that in the old Hampshire county, as late as 1753, there were only two private carriages, the county then including Hampden and Franklin counties. These were owned by Col,. Israel Williams of Hatfield and Moses Por- ter of Hadley. Horse sleds, or sleighs, were simply a box with a seat set on runners used for winter travel. When Moses Mun- son came from Farmington, Conn., in 1784, all his household goods, his wife and children came upon a one-horse sled, these being in use before carriages on wheels. Lieut. Perez Bardwell had what was called a pung of extra finish, in 1773, and Salah Graves had one in 1782, Col. Allis had a pung that was painted in 1776, Dr. Dickinson had a sleigh in 1790 and Dr. Francis Harwood had one about the same time, though I never saw Dr. Harwood on his rounds visiting his patients except astride his faithful horse and in his old age he sat so firm that he seemed really a part of the horse, with his saddle bags con- taining his medicines. Jacob Rosefield had a shop opposite Bartlett's corner, where he made cart wheels, about 1790. Coming down to a later date, about 1808 or '09, Elijah Sander- son came from Conway and he, soon after, had a shop on the south side of the brook, on privilege No. 5, where he turned hubs for wheels and commenced manufacturing one-horse pleas- ure wagons, and about the same time Charles Bardwell, who lived where George W. Moore does now, commenced making wagons. In 1812, Thomas Crafts had several hands at the work. Simeon Graves in Christian Lane, Sylvester Morton, Chester Wells and his brother Luther, and perhaps others were engaged in making and selling these vehicles, and salesmen were sent all over the territory where they could dispose of their goods. One horse would draw about four of them over our poor roadways. In 1807, there were eleven carriages and wagons assessed to the following persons: Lieut. John Brown, one, Isaiah Brown, one, Lieut. Noah Bardwell, one, Charles Bardwell, one, Reuben and Aaron Belden, one, Capt. Seth Frary, one, Maj. Phineas Frary, one, Martin Graves, one, Maj. 259 Thomas Sanderson, one, David Stockbridge, one, Capt. Salhion White, one. These wagons were buih strong and were inno- cent of any kind of springs, except the seat, which had a "slight spring. But it was a long time before the horse block could be dispensed with, as people as late as 1824, went to meeting Sun- days husband and wife on the same horse, the man on the sad- dle, the wife on the pillion, perhaps with a baby in her arms, and thus they traveled. When Erastus Crafts and Maria Lam- son were married 4 Nov., 18 17, Uncle Erastus related the incident to me; he said that Uncle Graves Crafts made a string of verses about them. They rode horseback, his bride seated upon the pillion. The horse was known as old "White eye," and he had borrowed old Doctor Harwood's loaded whip for the occasion and instead of going to Europe or some great city they went to Rowe. I have one stanza which runs as follows : "There's Erastus and Mrs^ Maria They both can have their heart's desire ; The Doctor's whip will make "White eye" go And they will gallop straight for Rowe." I mention this incident to show conditions as they then existed as a sort of an exhibit in contrast to the present fashion of managing such marriage trips now-a-days. Erastus Crafts was a highlj' respected citizen, as well informed as men in general, and his wife was one the best of women. They lived together as husband and wife over fifty-four years. In 1803 or '04, there were no chaises or wagons taxed in town, though Rev. Rufus Wells had a chaise, he was not taxed for any of his property. Dea. Thomas Sanderson then lived on Indian Hill, in Deerfield, which has since been annexed to Whately. Saltpeter was made at the part of the town on the road leading from the Straits to the Frank D. Belden place, on land formerly owned by James Whalen, on a small flat piece of ground partly down Hopewell Hill. Another site for this busi- ness was some twenty rods north of the Giles Dickinson place, just across the bridge over Roaring brook, and the hill there has long been known as "Pete Hill." These places seem to have been selected for boiling the lye. This was procured by leach- 26o ing'soil from underneath buildings and similar sources. Then the high price for such commodities doubtless served as the incentive, as well as its need for the manufacture of powder. Nail Making. Spencer Graves, when in his ninetieth year, told me that he well recollected when a boy, of going to the mill on Indian Hill and seeing Amos Marsh and his son, Thomas, who not only attended the mill, but also engaged in making nails, and he had often seen a Mr. Hicks, who succeeded the Marshes, at work with the machine cutting nails. The iron was in strips of suflScient width to slice off a nail of the size to be made, then these were headed by hand. The machine, he thought, was worked by lever power. This was the way in which Asa Marsh, "the aged," made nails, about 1804 or '05. Tar KiIvNS. There were two or three of these kilns, one being owned by Graves Crafts and was a little north of the north center schoolhouse on the east side of the road ; another by Dea. Thomas Sanderson, and we learn from his account book that he employed Nathaniel Sartwell at his tar kiln, in 1778. Where they disposed of the tar, or the amount produced, I do not know, but in the east part of the town there was a heavy growth ofyello\v, or pitch pine, and as they cut off the forests the stumps and roots that were charged with pitch were used for its manufacture. Potash was made near the residence of Col. Josiah Allis, by whom I do not know, but have supposed by Col. Allis. Then there was another potash works near the house of Paul Belden, but whether this was carried on by Mr. Belden, George Rogers or by some other party I have no means of determining. Needles. About 1806, Widow Elizabeth Phelps came from Northampton and bought the house where William Bard- well lived. Later it was sold to L. S. Wilcox and raised up a story. Mr. Phelps was a silversmith and from him their son, Edward, obtained much of his skill in mechanics. At one time he undertook to manufacture sewing needles. How long he continued in this business I do not know, or whether he con- sidered it a success. The writer has samples of his make, and I am certain the market for them now would be rather small. Distilleries. When cider became abundant in Whately, the market was quite limited. So to dispose of the surplus, dis- 26l tilling became quite common. Cider brandy was sent by tlie boats to Hartford and by large vessels to New York. Some years the quantity was quite large, amounting to fifty barrels or more. The distillery on the east side of Gutter bridge, near where the road to South Deerfield branches off from Chestnut Plain street, was run for many years by Rev. Daniel Hunting- ton, Edward Phelps and Leonard Loomis. They were partners, running a general merchandizing and the distilling of cider brandy. They dissolved partnership about 1825 to '27, Phelps keeping the distillery. Prior to this, Reuben and Aaron Belden run a distillery some years, Zenas Field early in this century, lyieut. John Brown before 1820, Dexter and Noah Crafts, Jerre Graves, John E. Waite, G. W. and A. J. Crafts and now LumanS. Crafts. Possibly there were others, that I do not recall. Merchants in Whately. Pea. Simeon Waite and his son. Gad Waite, kept a small assortment of goods and groceries where Calvin S. Loomis lives and sold intoxicating liquors, soon after he came fo the town in 1760. They sold by the quart or gallon, or they mixed and sold flip by the mug, etc. Samuel Grimes opened a store, in 1797, where he kept dry goods, gro- ceries and liquors, mixed flip and sold to customers. Gad Smith opened a store in the Straits as soon as 1778, and David Stock- bridge about 1 801. The Straits was, for many years, the most populous and enterprising part of the town. Levi Bush, Jr., came in 1823 or '24, selling dry goods and groceries, including intoxicating liquors, until about 1828. Eurotus Morton came about that time, 1828, and associated with him was Samuel B. White at the center, east of the old meeting-house. They kept an assortment of merchandise, including spirits. William W. San- derson sold dry goods and groceries, Samuel Lesure the same. The Whately Co-operative store was in existence several years, from 1859 or '60, to '66, then Ashley Hayden, Darius Stone, and since him A. W. Crafl;s, Micajah Howes and son, Ryland C, have had possession. E. H. Woods opened a store near Ashley G. Dickinson's, but soon went to the railroad station. After this there was a union store, with thirty or forty owners, then Caleb L- Thayer, Horace H. Hastings, Eugene E. Wood, John H. Pease, Henry C. Ashcraft and it is now owned by Arthur J. Wood. At West Whately we first had a Mr. Lull on Poplar Hill, Reuben Winchell at the center, Childs & Jenuey at the west 26-2 part, then some one who bought them out whose name I forget. At the centre Huntington, Phelps & Loomis, and earlier still, at the center, Lefnuel and Jvistus Clark had a store near the stockade monument. They bought out Dr. Perez Chapin who, I think, kept a grocery store. Elijah AUis and Chester Wells run a general store, and after them Salmon White AUis, and perhaps others that I don't recall. PoCKETBOOKS. This branch of business was for many years a very important one, furnishing work for a large number of the women and children of the town besides tho.se who were kept in constant employment at the factory. This, it must be remem- bered, was before the invention of the sewing machines and all the stitching upon thousands of dozens of pocketbooks, wallets and bill books had to be done by hand. This work was given oht to be done at the homes of our people, while the cutting, pasting and pricking the holes for the stitches was done at the factory, as well as other needful work in finishing and packing the work for the market. There was a force of from five to seven men and probably a dozen or more young ladies in con- , stant employment, and a much larger force of stitchers scattered over the town. Col. Harwood was a great manager and under his management the town was much benefitted. True, the pay- ment to the outside help was paid from the store, yet many a boy and girl was able by their own labor to obtain many nice articles of wearing apparel, while the employment of their spare time and the earning of this money taught them a useful lesson, raised their self respect and exerted a refining influence that was far reaching. All of this will apply to the manufacturing by Stephen Belden and Lemuel Graves. They were each doing the same kind of business, but not on so large a scale. Between them all they probably had as many as sixty families engaged in the work of stitching, and were distributing thousands of dol- lars each year for this purpose. Aside from these there were some others from South Deerfield that used to send out a team with work to be done. Then our old friend. Miles B. Morton, was in the same business seven or eight years, and William F. Bardwell took contracts to manufacture tor Luman Pease, I think of South Deerfield, and Samuel W. Steadman and his brother-in-law, R. B. Hawks, did some business in the same line. 263 Broom Corn and Brooms. Broom com was planted, at first as a curiosity, as early as 1780 to '85. Sylvester Judd mentions its growth at these early dates, but its worth was not appreciated by the public, as they were apparently satisfied with their birch brooms. Broom corn is probably a species of sor- ghum, or guinea corn, with a jointed stem like the sorghum and Indian corn, and grows to the height of eight or nine feet according to the fertility of the soil. The head or brush pro- duces a seed like the sorghum plant only the brush is longer and, when allowed to ripen, is used for grinding with corn for provender. When the seed ripens the brush turns to a reddish color, and is more brittle and of less worth than when harvested in the blossom. The first one mentioned by Mr. Judd, to com- mence its cultivation with a view of utilizing it for manufactur- ing brooms was Levi Dickinson of Hadley. This was about 1797. His first brooms were sold by peddlers through the adjoining towns. Its culture soon spread through the river towns, and in 1805, several Whately men commenced to culti- Hate it. The most prominent at this early period were Reuben, Aaron and Francis Belden, three brothers. They not only grew the corn, but essayed to manufacture the brooms, but they did not meet with popular approval on account of their poor manu- facture. They would soon get loose on the handle, and the women did not like them. The method of making them was to take a sapling of suitable size, peel off the bark and after it was seasoned they would attach a string to the side of the room, long enough to fasten the brush for a broom, then fastening the string to the handle commence to walk forward, rolling the broom around and drawing it as closely as the strength of the string would allow until sufficient brush was used to make the broom of the proper size. These were of course round and then to flatten them they used an axe or a heavy mall, and later flat- tened them under the cider mill press. About 1820, they began to use a spool, or as they termed it roller, some fifteen inches long. On this the twine was wound and the workman sat at his bench and held the spool under his feet and by properly placing the bru.sh and using a suitable implement called a "pounder" the broom was made flat. This "pounder" was made of steel, about two and one-half inches wide and six inches long with edges a quarter of an inch thick, and weighed fully two pounds. This was used to crush down the stalks of the brush so as to fasten the broom so tight that it would seldom 264 get loose. Then when sewed the broom was placed in between the jaws of the sewing horse and allowed to spread sufficiently to meet the wishes of the workman and then sewed with twinei as at present done. CHAPTER XIV. AGRICULTURE. It would seem passing strange if I, to the farm born, should neglect to say something upon this very important topic. The fact that Whately has always been, and now is, a farming town no one will for a moment dispute. Our first settlers were all farmers, obtaining their bread by industridusly stirring mother earth to induce the best and richest returns in exchange for their tireless labor and watchful care. s The soil of course is varied, the eastern portion containing the rich alluvial meadows skirting the Connecticut river, and the second level all free from stone, but of a lighter and more sandy nature, yet warm, quick to respond to culture, and where it is fertilized is among^its best lands. The ease of culti- vation induced its owners to sow it with rye continuously until it was ryed to death. Then they used to let it lay over a year and then sow rye again. If by chance a piece was planted with corn and from four to six loads of pretty poor compost put in the hill often twenty-five to thirty bushels of corn would be har- vested. But fearful that some of the manure used would leach from the soil the land would be sowed to rye again as soon as the corn could be put into the stook, and the much-abused land would yield eight or ten bushels of rye to the acre. Then the straw, for which there was no market, was often put in the barn- yard on top of the muck or soil, and at every clearing of the yard earth was removed. The land was flat or level, not admitting of drainage, and the cattle and cows would go to the bottom at every step, so then 266 the straw would be littered over tlie porridge-like barnyard, and by the time that it would freeze so as to bear up the cattle, the straw would be to some extent mixed with the muck and the droppings of the cattle. The cattle, by the way, were turned into the yard to drink at about lo o'clock a. m., and cold oi storm, left there to hook and chase each other until the boys came home from school. Then they were tied up, and either hay or corn stalks were fed, the men going to the barn generally twice to feed after the boys were through. The milking was not a long job. I very well recollect that my sister and I had to milk the four cows and the amount of milk would not exceed eight quarts in the morning and less at night. They were fed no grain or mess of any kind and the amount of butter fat would only make comment by its paucity. Most every year an old cow that had been to pasture out on the hills during the latter portion of the season was fed com6 fall and winter until killed, a peck basket full of small potatoes morning and night and I had to do that as part of my chores. The oxen when worked were fed corn on the ear. The horses were fed as much as two quarts of oats per day as a rule. It was somewhat difi&cult to make what butter our large family wanted, but it had to go as none would be bought. Our methods were simply typical of many others. The ground planted was fertilized by the manure drawn out of the yards in the fall, it being placed in piles, six or eight loads in each, so as to be handy for use in the planting time, and almost invariably used in the hill for all kinds of hoed crops. Seventy to seventy-five years ago the principal thing sold from the farm was stock, cattle and pork, aside from a small amount of butter that was taken at the stores in exchange for goods. Then rye, corn, oats and broom corn were the principal crops. Some few raised flax, but that soon ceased. The broom corn was usually or quite frequently used on the farm, as broom makers were seemingly as numerous as shoemakers in Lynn, and it was thus turned into cash together with needful labor. Tobacco from Virginia pressed into plugs sold at about five cents a plug or thirteen cents per pound. Butter in i8i 6 was twelve and one-half cents, in 1811 oats sold for 2s 6d, or forty two cents when sold by the single bushel, corn fifty cents, rye sixty-seven, wheat seventy-five. The market for grain was largely local, as there was no means of transporting it except by teams. As for butter, the stores would buy it at from ten to twelve and 267 one-half cents, work it all over, pack it in firkins or tubs and send it by teams to Boston. The people of to-day, with railroads traversing the country in every direction, even carrying milk by the thousands of cans I to Boston and meats by hundred of car loads, also butter and ' cheese, at but a modicum of the former cost receive a much larger price for their commodities. Then there were only the local markets, now Northampton, Holyoke, Chicopee and Springfield afford excellent, as well as near-by markets, for any surplus products the farmer may have. Formerly fruit was only raised for home use. Apples it is true yielded some income, as the cider would sell at from seven- ty-five cents to one dollar a barrel for drinking purposes and dis- tillation and large quantities of cider brandy were sent to Hart- ford and New York, going by boat down the river. Eggs were seldom sold for more than twelve and one-half cents a dozen and then only in the heighth of the season. TOBACCO. Tobacco was raised by most of the farmers to a greater or less extent from the earliest settlement of the Connecticut val- ley, and was a source of trade mostly confined to a sort of retail trade among the people living in hill towns. This was prepared for market by sweating it in a rather primitive manner. It seems that it was hung up to dry or cure for awhile, and then when it had begun to cure they took it down and piled it in smallish heaps to induce heat or fermentation until it was in condition for use, occasionally repacking it so as to secure as even a sweat as possible in that way. When the sweat was fin- ished the leaves were stripped from the stalks and done up in hands and packed away to keep moist until winter. Those who made a business of sending out peddlers would in the winter strip out the center stem and either braid it in rolls, or in some other way make it attractive and thus dispose of it. After the Revolutionary war the crop was more extensively grown, and I recall the fact of a purchase of quite a large tract of land, some sixty acres, by Reuben and Asa Crafts, pay- able one-third in silver money, one-third in tobacco and the balance in stock. I have this from a son of Reuben Crafts, his uncle Asa taking the silver monej- and carrying it on his horse to some town in New York state and paid the first installment. This is in part the valuable lands now owned by the Hon. Lyman A. Crafts near the railway station in Whately. 268 Mr. Sheldon says: Tobacco was raised in Deerfield in 1696, and Daniel Belden liad hung a portion of his crop in the attic to dry before the Indians attacked Belden's house in Sep- I tember of that year, and some of his children hid among it and • they in that way escaped capture by the savages." After the incorporation of the town, in 1771, we find that the young minister, Rev. Rufus Wells,- was accustomed to raise quite a quantity, selling it to anyone wishing to buy. The price for the hand not stripped was usually six pence per pound. He however sold some to Parson Emerson, the Conway minister, for five pence, bub sometimes his price was eight pence a pound. Among the largest growers in town were Joshua Belden, his sons, Reuben and Aaron Belden, Dea. lyCvi Morton, Reuben and Asa Crafts and Perez Wells. It isn't probable that at that pferiod the whole acreage devoted to tobacco culture would ex- ceed fifteen acres. After the introduction of plug or pressed tobacco from Virginia the growing entirely ceased, except in isolated instances where some one who was accustomed to the use of the leaf raised a supply' for his own use. About 1-843, Stephen Belden procured some tobacco seed and raised a quantity of tobacco in 1844, shipping it to New York with his brooms. His tobacco was packed in barrels and he sold it for four cents a pound. This was the commencement of raising Connecticut seed leaf tobacco in Whately. The next year Lewis Wells, S. and H. Dickinson and Isaac Frary, Jr., each commenced with a small patch of tobacco and after it was cured they drove over to Hadley where they sold it for six cents a pound to Loomis of SuEEeld. The next year they had about an acre each, and Mr. Loomis came to Whately and bought their crops, paying about twelve cents foi the wrappers and four, cents for the fillers. The amount of money brought to these men for their crops induced others to commence its growth, and at the end of ten years there were about seventy acres devoted to its culture. Prices varied from ten to fourteen cents, average about twelve and one-half cents a pound. These prices stimu- lated its production. In 1865, we had some over 300 acres in cultivation. Of course values were increased as a result of the deprecia- tion of our paper money, though if reduced to a gold basis they were very low. The price in 1865 was about twenty cents per pound in greenbacks, really less than ten cents in silver or gold. As paper depreciated the price rose so that one year I sold my 2^9 crop at thirty-five cents and the world seemed to go wild over our profits and every effort was used to increase the acreage. New and valuable buildings were erected for curing the crop, at great expense, in the place of old and tumbled-down structures and in this present year (1899) new and elegant buildings are being erected. It is' claimed that ten large barns, of from seventy-five to one hundred and twenty-five feet by thirty, having a hanging capacity of at least forty acres, have been erected. The methods of fertilization have kept pace with the march of investigation by our agricultural experiment stations and in- stead of fertilizing wholly with stable manures and Peruvian guano, they now use extensively cotton seed meal and potash in some available form as it is an absolute necessity to produce a leaf that can be used for a wrapper in order to obtain a price that will compensate the grower for his outlay of time and money. A good, desirable leaf always finds buyers and those that don't haggle over a reasonable price. This is by far the leading interest of our townsrijen and we have occupied consid- erable space to trace its history. Now I will close with a little incident of church inteference. Rev. C. N. Seymour came to Whately and was installed, 9 March, 1853, and remained about six years. He was a liberal preacher and well liked by the townspeople. During his stay in town the association of ministers met in Whately and among the ultra-pious men were many that believed it was an awful sin to use the vile Indian weed and of course that added the men who grew it to a sinful class. They discussed the question with much eloquence, and it ended in resolutions recommending the ministers in the tobacco growing towns to use every effort by prayer and exhortation to stop raising it, and they called on their good Brother Seymour to give his views. Until then he had maintained a discreet silence, but he arose and all eyes were upon him, and he very wittily remarked, "That he didn't particularly care what his parishioners raised if they would only raise his salary," and took his seat. The panic of 1873 was successful in ruining most of the parties living in town who had entered into the trade in tobacco. Tobacco that cost nearly or quite thirty cents a pound dropped down to some eight or ten cents a pound, carrying-most of the local dealers in Franklin and Hampshire counties into insol- vency. We mention this to show the unfavorable side of the tobacco trade. Abandoned farms in whatei 1* W to 3 o 28r a few rods on his lot, then crossing the Claverack road near the house of Sherman B. Bardwell and empties into Mill river. The next brook, always known as Schoolhouse brook, rises from springs under Stony hill, crosses the Chestnut Plain road near the junction of the crossroad with Chestnut Plain road, runs thence southeasterly and empties into Mill river. White's brook is at the foot of the hill south of the Salmon P. White place. The next is Frary's brook, rising in springs northwest of Lincoln B. Sanderson's, crosses the road and runs on San- derson's land, and running between his house and barn, finds its way to Mill river. Mill river, that has received all these tributaries, rises in the eastern portion of Conway, passes into the southwest part of Deerfield ; then through Whately and empties into the Connec- ticut river after passing through Hatfield, affording some water power in Hatfield and also in what we call Mill river in Deer- field. There are several large drains on the east side that dis- charge considerable water into it. Great Swamp drain has its outlet across Claverack and enters Mill river, and from this junc- tion takes the name of Little river. We have as tributaries of Roaring brook : Clark's brook which empties east of the place owned by Seth B. Crafts on the Easter road, Marsh's brook which rises in the southeast part of Conway, and also Burgess brook. West brook rises in Conway, and the two streams that unite to form this brook are known as Sinkpot brook and Avery's brook. They unite in the south part of Conway, flow into the northwest corner of Whately, and flows southeasterly to its junc- tion with Mill river at a point near the line between Hatfield and Whately. This stream furnishes a large amount of water power. Its tributaries are first the Todd brook, which rises in Conway and runs southerly east of Rufus D. Waite's, and emp- ties into West brook. The next and largest tributary is known as Harvey's brook. It comes from Williamsburg and has long been used to furnish power for two sizable shops. Poplar Hill brook is between Poplar hill and Mt. Esther. On this brook "Silver" Joel Munson and his father, old Uncle Moses Munson, had a mill for wood turning. Mitchell's brook, a small stream on the north side of West brook, and Potash brook empties east of the Otis Bardwell place. This unites, or receives several small streams that runs from under Mt. Esther and Bull hill, and takes its name from Potash hill. 282 A small stream rises north of the E. S. Munson plaee and empties into W.est brook. Then to go back we will find a small brook tinder the hill near the West Whately cemetery. Then Munson's brook empties into West brook on the land of Otis Bard well ; this runs under Shingle hill and comes along near the JJaydenville road, and is sometimes called "Still brook," frqm the fact that near it was one or more distilleries. All empty into West brook. Horse Mountain brook rises in the southr west part of Whately in that section known as Grass hill, flows southerly into Williamsburg uniting with the Joe Wright brook. The two united are afterwards known as Beaver brook. The other brooks empty into the Connecticut river. Begin- ning at the north side of the town we have what the Indians called "Weekioannuck," but now known as Sugar Loaf brook. TMs rises in South Deerfield, crosses the Whately and Sunder- latidroad, near the house where Abraham Parker settled, and runs southerly emptying into the Connecticut on land owned by E, A. Scott's heirs. This affords power for a grist and sawmill. Hopewell brook rises from springs under Hopewell hill and runs southerly, crossing the road near the East cemetery, then crosses the River road and empties on land of S. W. AUis. The fight known as the Swamp fight with the Indians was near tke head of this brook. It has a small tributary from a small run near where the Wilcox house stands opposite Bartlett's cor- ner, and also takes the water from Poplar spring. Tbare is a small brook that crosses the River road near Frank D. Belden's- house. The water from all these brooks can be turned into one channel, and has been so used at Belden's mill. There is a small one near the south line of the town, near the Shaylor E. Belden place, sometimes called the Great Drain from Hopewell. NAMES OF HILLS AND LOCALITIES. "Old fields," so called, is a piece of ground tolerably level and rather free from stone, lying west of the Giles Dickinson house. These were old cultivated fields when the town was first settled. It is evident that the Indians planted the land for per- haps ages upon ages, as many relics of their manufacture were found here. Miron Dickinson found a complete stone pot or bowl and thoughtlessly broke it to pieces with his hoe. Arrow heads and other utensils such as pestles for pounding their corn, etc., were found here, and near "old fields" was an Indian resi- dent known as old Samson Johnson. He, had three sons that i 283 recollect as late as about 1830 to '35, Eph, Dave and Cyrus. They used to work for the farmers by the month or otherways. Beach island is located east of the Barnard farm and is a barren spot in Great swamp. It is related of a man named Tryon that he lived there in a shanty for sometime to escape arrest. Swamp hill is on the east side of Mill river lying mostly on the farms of Jonathan W. and Wells Dickinson and the Scott brothers, Frank O. and Lewis. Staddle hill is northwest from George E. Sanderson's, on the road to Conway, this side of Long pond woods. Indian hill ; this name has long attached to this hill. Here Adoniiah Taylor built his house, a gristmill and sawmill, which is now owned by George E. Sanderson. The widow Waite's woods are west of Ambrose Scott'-s place and south of "old fields." A place much frequented by partridges and squirrels. The name Widow Waite's woods is de- rived from the widow of John Waite, son of Benjamin, the Indiaa scout. Capt. Salmon White married her daughter, Mary Waite. The mother, after the death of her husband, lived some years with Capt. White and wife, and she died 18 Aug., 1791, aged ninety-nine years. She owned this lot and the name still clings to that portion covered with wood. I think it is on lot No. 66, fourth division of Commons. Weller hill is west of Asa and Noah Dickinson's places. It takes its name from its first owner, Richard Weller. The Park is the hill east of the Easter road to Conway and is mostly in a pasture owned by the Scott brothers. It extends into the northwest corner of the Doctor Harwood farm. Mount Esther, or Easter as it is generally called, is. the ratig^ of hill or hills lying north of Irving AUis' place. This eminence was called Easter from some woman who had a dairy and sugarhouse camp or ranch. Her name was spelled Esther, but that was pronounced Eayter in those early days. Such dairy houses were frequently established where an abundance of good grazing lands were found, and as much df the sugar used was home made so Hatfield people went to the sugar trees and boiled the sap, and this hill has always been a famous place for grazing and for maple sugar making. Bull hill commences north of the residence of George Dick-, inson and extends north into the Doctor Harwood farm, now owned by W. P. Crafts. Spruce hill is a fertile and excellent tract of land extending nearly or quite to the West brook. Stony Hill ; this long range of hills west of Chestnut Plain Street about a mile and a half, full of stones and ledges, is wholly unfit for cultivation and kept mostly for wood. Over the west side there are pastures. The hill extends from opposite the old meeting-house to the West brook, back of Round knoll and Round hill. Chestnut mountain ; this is a remarkably fer- tile elevation, and the "West brook seems to have worn a channel through between Stony hill and the mountain. This seems ap- parent to the most careless observer. Round'hill, so called from its singular form, is east of the lower end of Stony hill and rises some 200 feet above its eastern base. Round knoll, just north of Round hill, is similar in its configuration to Round hill, but not so high into probably fifty or seventy-five feet. This last is about west from the Luke B. White place. Going west from Chestnut mountain is Shingle hill, which lies south of Paul W. Field's, extending into Wil- liamsburg. On this hill Nathan Waite and his son, Jeremiah, lived in 1782; after them Benjamin, a son of Jeremiah, then Gilbert Smith and his son, Harwood Smith. Now the house is torn down and the road discontinued. Hog mountain lies west of Willis F. Waite's house and C. E- Bardwell's, and south to Grass hill. This hill was thus named from a party of hunters from Hatfield ; while on this hill they were frightened by hearing some sounds that they mistook for the guttural sounds of Indians; they fled hastily to Hatfield. The alarm was given and a squad of men fully armed started to investigate. They carefully went to where the hunters had first heard what they had thought proceeded from Indians, and they soon found that the ominous sounds came from an old sow vshile suckling her pigs. From this circumstance this eminence has since borne the euphonious name of Hog mountain. Grass hill is south and west of Hog mountain. It has a fertile soil and at one time had quite a number of houses. It is now principally used for pasturage. In my opinion the best soil adapted to apples and other fruit growing of any portion of the town. The Pinnacle; a high hill or summit north of Grass hill and south of what is known as New Connecticut, which extends most up to the John Starks or Caleb Beals place, on the old Williamsburg road, and west of Samuel Sanderson's place. Dry hill, running north from the old John Starks place into Conway, where first lived Jonathan and Amasa Edson and after 285 them Orange and Chester Bardwell. The name was given in consequence of its being overrun by fire, destroying the wood. Poplar hillis that hill extending north from the Baptist meet- ing-house, past the Chester Brown place and on northerly into Conway. It is east of the West brook and west of Easter ; an excellent fruit growing section. The road takes its name from this hill. Pleasant hill, where George Dickinson now resides. This place affords one of the finest views of the Connecticut River Valley, embracing many towns east of the river. Coon's Den, west of Irving AUis' house, a rough, rugged, ledgy locality filled with loose rocks, affording a cover for wild animals ; for- merly a great place for coons, wild-cats and other animals to escape pursuit, and reach a place of refuge. Gutter hill, near the center cemetery, has reference only to the roadway. Dr. Dickin.son's hill ; this is the hill west of Christian I^ane bridge over Mill river as you go to the centre. The Doctor lived on the Calvin S. I/Oomis place several years before 1800. Chestnut Plain hill has sometimes been called an unsavory name in consequence of the great number of geese that were pastured on its wide plats of grass. It seemed in my younger days pretty sharp work to avoid their droppings. Mill hill, as you rise from Chestnut Plain road to the mill near E. C. Warner's. Great Swamp Bridge hill, on Claverack road as you go north from the Gad Crafts place, just beyond the Egypt road, has been graded so the ascent is slight. Trumbul's hillis the knoll south of the Stephen Belden place and north of the Gilbert place. It has often been said that a man by the name of Trumbul was killed here by the Indians. Burying Ground hill, near the east cemetery. This is the ascent from the meadows up Hopewell hill to the Straits, and only refers to the road. White's hill, where Capt Salmon White settled. Alpha Dickinson hill, only a reference to the Chestnut Plain road as you go south toward Schoolhouse brook, from where Ashley G. Dickinson lives. Old Boy hill, a rise in the Grass hill road thirty rods or so west of where IvUther Thompson's house stood. Hopewell hill is the hill that rises from the meadows to the second level. It extends the entire width of the town, and it rises about fifty feet on an average. Egypt is that portion of the Egypt road from about twenty- 286 five rods east of the Connecticut River railroad and continues across the wet land to the point where the Mother George road leaves it. There was for many years a heavy growth of hem- lock and pine trees that grew along both sides of the roadway, and near it the overhanging branches shut out the light, so that at night it was as dark as Egypt. Hence the name. Christian Lane proper is understood to refer only to the houses east of the Lane bridge to the houses of Moses and I/evi Graves, now owned by Fred Iv. and L. F. Graves, while it is sometimes alluded to as the I,ane road from Bartlett's corner to the railroad station. While west of the station to the crossing of the Northampton extension has always been spoken of as the causeway. This was corduroyed before 1788, as my mother has often told of riding over it in an ox cart when the family re- moved to Christian Lane. Why it should be designated "Chris- tian" I don't know for certain, but presume from the fact that Deacon Simeon Waite, the earliest settler, was a stanch old- school Christian, whose mouth was always giving pious exhor- tations even while he dealt out liquor by the jug full or con- cocted the beverage of the times, "phlipp," to his ungodly cus- tomers. Straits. This is a portion of the Deerfield road contained between Bartlett's corners south to and including the houses of Josiah Gilbert and Benjamin Bacon. The reason of its name, "The Straits," is supposed to be that it was a strip of land that was dry, making a fine roadway between the wet lands both east and west of it, Hopewell proper and Great Swamp. This last until drained was very wet. For a long time it was the most populous portion of the town, being the traveled route to the north, and had at one time two quite large stores and three hotels. Canterbury was so called as early as 1718 and probably earlier, but I can give no reason for its name. It is now spoken of as including the S. W. AUis place to the Deerfield line. Claverack probably takes its name from some fancied re- . semblance to Claverack, N. Y. It is level, free from stone and airly fertile. In the time of the Revolutionary war we had a squad of Whately men located at Claverack, N. Y. Dead Meadow is a portion of land west of the road to South Deerfield and south of the John Waite farm house on that road. Its peculiarity that gives it the name is that it has no wood growing upon it, but to the extent of some acres is covered with 2^7 a coarse sedge that has sometimes been mowed for bedding for the stables; while all about it is a heavy growth of wood. This has been its condition from the earliest tradition. CHAPTER XVI. PHYSICIANS OF WHATBLY. As I look upon the subject I am inclined to think that a good doctor is of more importance than a full fledged minister, even though he is dubbed a Doctor of Divinity. For many years it has seemed that the man of pills accomplished more than the tinkerer of theology. I suppose this is all according as we view these matters. Those who differ from me and still be- lieve that the claim they have always made that they have a divine call, are certainly entitled to the privilege of thinking as they do. But our kind-hearted, noble physician, who braves heat and cold, rain or snow, day or night, seemingly only desir- ous to relieve suffering ; and perhaps at the dead of night com- pelled to leave his comfortable home and hasten to the bedside of the suffering, and with cheering and hopeful words strives to allay the fears of both patient and surrounding friends. He thus strengthens the courage of the sufferer, and then by the giving of some simple remedy great good results. Such ef- forts tell upo 1 us all; while of the other class, I only wish I could say something of them of a similar nature. Our first doctor was Perez Chapin. He was with us ten years and left his mark upon our young town. He was con- stant in his efforts to help the cause of independence, as well as to cheer the hearts of the despondent or the sufierings of those who were really sufiering from disease. When he came to Whately, in 1778, it was a dark time for the patriots, and his voice was often raised in words of encouragement ; thus ' he did 289 all ttat he could to help on the good cause. His first child was bom in Whately in November, 1778. Dr. Benjamin Dickinson came from Sunderland in 1787, and bought the Abial Bragg property, the present Calvin S. Loomis place, and remained here until 1804, being quite promi- nent as a physician. He was born about 1740, and was about forty-five years old when he came to Whately. He- remained here about seventeen years, so was about sixty-five to sixty-seven years old when he removed to Hudson, N. Y. During his stay in town a Dr. Oliver Norton came in 1788, but left in 1789. Of him I haven't even a tradition, and do not know where he came from or where he went. Dr. Francis Harwood came in 1794 at the age of thirty-one years. He had married his wife in Belchertown, and two chil-. dren were born before they came here. He was a fine talker, of gentlemanly appearance; a smart, well-balanced man. He continued his practice till near the end of his life, 20 May, 1835, aged seventy-two years. He was a Free Mason. His oldest son, Joshua Dickinson Harwood, was educated for the profes- sion and practised with his father. He died in 1820, his habits not being favorable to longevity. Dr. Chester Bardwell came to Whately from Hatfield in 1 8 16, and built his house on the corner of Chestnut Plain street and West lane, or Lover's lane. This street was laid after he had built, a couple of ye'ars or so. He continued to practice his profession until his death, 14 May, 1864. He was a man that the town took a decided interest in, sending him three times to- the House of Representatives, and twice the county made him their senator. He was a noble man. Dr. Miron Harwood was a son of Dr. Francis. After graduat- ing from his medical schools he commenced practice in his na- tive town, and a.t once secured a fair practice. His pleasant address, his ability as a surgeon, the tender touch of his hands seeming to have a soothing effect on every one needing surgical assistance, as well as his success as a physician, made him ex- tremely popular. Our two long-life doctors, Harwood and Bard- well, are as yet honored names in our town. The next doctor was James Hannum. He came from Westfield about the time of Dr. Harwood' s decease in 1877. He only stayed a little over a year, and was succeeded by Dr. James D. Seymour, in 1878. He is a son of Dr. Seymour of Greenfield. He has probably had a better preparatory practice 290 than any of his predecessors, and aside from his studies and hos- pital practice, has undoubtedly superior natural ability to prac- tice his honored profession. On the whole, Whately is to be congratulated upon having had so many skillful physicians. BOATING ON THE CONNECTICUT RIVER. The portion of the boating which we more particularly wish to mention is in relation to those firms who owned the boats that our town was interested in. These were owned by Stockbridge, Culver & Co., and later Stockbridge, Allen & Root. Mr. Stockbridge was of Whately, while Allen and Root were of Greenfield. They owned a large number of ■ boats of a size to carry about fifty tons. These were generally rigged with a mast and carried one sail of a considerable size, and when the wind was southerly they came up the river at a very pleasant rate of speed. The companies also owned several small steamers with a power sufficient to bring the loaded boats up the river. These steamers were made expressly for towing, with the wheel on the stern. The Ariel Cooley was a stern wheeler, ninety feet long and eighteen feet wide, with two high-pressure engines of twenty horse power each. This enabled the boats to make com - paratively quick trips. When other companies' boats offered they often towed them up. The work of boating usually commenced in the spring as soon as the water was low enough for the steamers to pass under the bridges between Northampton and Hadley, Sunderland and Deerfield. The boats, when I first became acquainted with them, used to load and unload at Belden's ferry. About 1834 a dock or wharf was built directly east of David Stockbridge's new hotel ; a great improvement on the landing place at Bel- den's ferry. My father was engaged in the manufacture of stoneware pottery. The clay came from New Jersey and from Hartford by these river boats, and when two or three boat loads came at a time he would have twelve to fifteen teams at work di awing it to the factory, about three miles away. We usually kept a yoke of oxen to help up the hill, and a boy like myself to drive them, so I write from my own observation. Prior to the use of the steam tugs the boatmen, when the winds were not favorable, had to resort to what they called a "white ash breeze," meaning white ash poles about two inches 291 in diameter, nicely turned from the best of timber, with a socket spike at the lower end and a nice head on the upper end for the shoulder; these were from twelve to twenty feet in length. On each side of the boat was what they called the "wale." This was raised about three and one-half feet above the bottom of the boat, and was a walk some eighteen inches wide; so on the wale of the boat the men walked when poling the boat up the stream. I used to see two men on. a side when poling the boat. They used to bring all the heavy lading from Hartford, landing it where it was most convenient for the merchant or manufacturer, and the return freights were made up of wood, shingles, staves, wooden ware and fine lumber, brooms and other manufactured material, hops, nuts, etc. They were taken on at the landing places, .sometimes a boat would take down hundreds of dozens of brooms piled on top of the other heavy freight. In the latter half of the eighteenth century there were large quantities of beef in barrels sent on these river boats for shipment to the West Indies. This industry furnished employ- ment for a good number of men, as the slaughtering and the coopering was all done at the Straits. Gad Smith was the leading spirit in the beef business. David Stockbridge had charge of all the boating interests in the section above Northampton to Greenfield, or Cheapside ; and I will close this condensed account by giving the brief allusion of my life-long friend, Capt. Tim Dewey. He says: "I have many pleasant remembrances of Mr. Stock- bridge. His table was always well loaded with the best of fare ; and this, with his open, pleasant countenance and relish for ,i good joke, especially a boatman's joke, was a strong inducement to all of his men to reach Stockbridge wharf in time for meals and, peradventure, to spend the night. He was very accommo- dating to all his customers and would make great sacrifices in order to take along their freight '6y the next boat.' For this purpose the old white horse and gig would spin up and down the valley at a marvelous rate of speed at all times of day or night ; and yet while courteous, he was dignified and con- servative, commanding the respect of all." Mr. Stockbridge had an interest in boating and rafting as early as 1800, and per- haps earlier. If he came into possession of his father's interest, and this seems quite probable, he may have been engaged in boating even before his marriage." 292 INNKEEPERS, OR ORDINARY KEEPERS. Public inns for rest and refreshment are as old as civilized society. Some of the earliest laws passed by the Massachusetts Colony relate to this subject, and are here copied: "In 1634, 3 Sept. It. is ordered that no person that keeps an ordinary shall take above 6d a me^l for a person, and not above id for an ale quart of beer out of meal time, under the penalty of los for every offence, either of diet or beer. Likewiye that victualers, or keepers of^n ordinary, shall not suffer any tobacco to be taken in their houses, under the penalty of 5s for every offence, to be paid by the victualer, and i2d by the party that takes it." "i635) 4 March. It is ordered that no person whatsoever shall keep a common victualing house, without license from the court, under the penalty of 20s a week." "1638, 6 Sept.. The inn- keepers, or ordinary keepers, shall have liberty to brew the beer which they sell in their houses, or to agree with the brewer as they can." The first settlers in the valley used great care in the selec- tion of their innkeepers. Men of high character — perhaps the oldest deacon, and only old men were chosen deacons then — were licensed to sell wine to persons "in real need." In March, 1678, Samuel Partridge had liberty to sell liquors "to the neigh- bors," "for their helpfulness," first in Hadley, and after 1685, in Hatfield. The county court always held its sessions at the inns; and it not only required good men to be licensed, but it required them to keep good liquors. In 1674, Nathaniel Ely, ordinary keeper at Springfield, was fined 40s "for not keeping beer that was according to law, ' ' made with four bushels of bar- ley malt to the hogshead. The laws forbidding the sale of strong waters of every kind to the Indians, were strict, and were commonly enforced ; though sometimes the temptation to exchange six quarts of rum for a good beaver skin, or one quart for two fathoms of wampum, was more than a trader could resist. An illicit traffic was carried on with the natives, greatly to their injury and the injury of the whites. And though Indian testimony was not commonly allowed in court, yet in this matter, the General Court in 1666, ordered, that "If any Indian do accuse any person of telling or delivering strong drink unto them, such Indian accusation shall be accounted valid against any such persons accused . ' ' 293 In 1670 a law was passed enjoining the selectmen of towns to take special care and notice of all and every person, or persons, that spend their time and estates by drinking and tippling in taverns and alehouses and require him or them to for- bear frequenting such houses or taverns; and if, after such warning, any person be legally convicted of drunkenness and misspending precious time and estate, he shall forfeit 5s for every offence, or sit in the stocks, as the judges shall see meet. AVine and beer were the liquors first imported from England. ■ Brandy was distilled from the wine ; and a strong liquor, called usquebaugh, was made from beer. Barbadoes rum, from the West Indies, came in use as early as 1650. New England rum, made from molasses, was in use about 1700. TAVERNS IN WHATELY. The first "baiting place" in town was "Poplar Spring," situated about forty rods north of the Zebina Bartlett place, on the Indian trail. Teamsters in going between Northampton and Deerfield, would take with them the feed for their cattle and lunch for themselves, and stop here for the noon rest and refreshment. Daniel Morton opened a house of entertainment for the emigrants on their way to settle the districts of Conway, soon after he built, in 1759, and kept a tavern for many years. John Lamson is named as an innkeeper in 1779. His house stood a little north of where Samuel Lesure now lives. John Crafts succeeded Mr. lyamson, probably in 1788. In 1789 he was taxed on "faculty," or income, 8d. He kept accounts with his regular customers by a chalk score ; a long mark was his charge for a mug of flip, a short mark for half a mug. Samuel Grimes had an inn in connection with his store as early as 1798. Elijah Allis opened a tavern at the house opposite Reuben Winchell's brick dwelling house, in 1818; he afterwards kept tavern on the corner west of the old meeting-house. Gad Smith kept a house of entertainment, in connection with his store, in the Straits. He was in business as early as 1779. His faculty tax in 1789 was 4s. A few years later, Joel Waite, known far and near as "Landlord Waite," opened a tavern in the Straits, which was a noted stopping place for stages, when these public conveyances were first started. His faculty tax in 1789 was is 8d. 294 David Stockbridge, Jr., bought the David Graves place in the Straits, and opened a tavern, perhaps as early as 1803. He continued in the business here till 1833, when he opened a public house at his new stand, on the river road. As early as 1794 Joshua Belden opened a tavern at his dwelling house, which was continued by his sons for several years. In the west part ol the town, Lieut. Noah Bardwell kept a tavern at his house on the Poplar hill road. The records show that he was in the business from 1783 to 1799. Charles Dickinson built and occupied the Oliver Graves place, in Christian lane, as a tavern from 1801 to 1803. Deacon Simeon Waite built the house where Calvin S. Loomis now lives before or in 1764. This he opened as a hotel and sold spirituous liquors, like Samuel Partridge, to the neigh- bors "For their helpfulness" I suppose; by the mug or half mug, or rum by the quart or gallon. He and his son kept some groceries up to about 1785 or thereabouts. As Mr. Temple gave the li.st down to 182 1 we will continue it to the present time : Elijah Allis, 1821 to 1830; Levi Bush, Jr., 1830 until 1841 ; Samuel Lesure, about two years ; Jehiel Barron, who died in i8 1-3 tn !^ w tn W o w 30t military duty. That is was required when duly warned to meet at the time and place specified, with all the necessary equip-, ments ; that is a gun, bayonet, cartridge box, belt, two flints, priming wire and brush. If deficient in any of these things he was liable to a fine which was at once assessed upon him. They usually met for the May training at i o'clock, p. m., and their equipments examined, and then they were drilled in marching by company and platoon. The music was a fife, a snare drum and base drum. Some kept fair time with the music, and if they could all have been in one section they would have ap- peared pretty well. But alas, such a mess as they made of it! Then they always met for a day just before the general muster ; this was usually held at Northampton and was a great occasion. This continued up to 1835, the year that I was old enough to be a soldier. At that time the whole thing was so unpopular that no one could be found to serve as an officer. James S. Whitney then of South Deerfield, I think was colonel of the reg- iment, and he appointed a day for meeting for the election of officers — captain, lieutenant and ensign — and we were duly warned to appear and fill the vacancies ; and Col. Whitney pre- sided. The company met at the hotel of Capt. Luke Wells. We all knew Gen. Whitney, and when the company was formed in line, the general gave us his views in pretty plain English and the necessity of a proper effort to elect good efficient men that would reflect honor upon our company as well as the town; that he should not allow any acts of insubordination, etc., etc. Then the ballots were collected and a captain was elected, but he as promptly declined the honor ; then the votes were again cast and another one was chosen, and he also declined to serve, and so one after another was chosen, but no one was elected ex- cept those who it was well understood would not serve ; and at last the presiding officer was convinced that it was useless to continue his efforts any longer and he, after a few deprecatory remarks, gave the order, "Right about face," and then "For- ward, march." We were on the west side of the main street which is ten rods wide, and near the east side of the street Capt. Wells had a long pile of manure some four or five rods long and probably three and one-half or four feet high, and when we reached that dizzy height the word "Halt" came, and then "You are dismissed." Now what a shout was heard, and for a time there was some pretty loud talk between the officer and the men. 302 That was the last of the training in Whately until after the close of the war, when those liable for duty in Williamsburg and Whately were ordered to meet and organize by choosing the needed officers. They met at Haydenville.and elected a full complement of officers. Charles R. Crafts, a veteran soldier, was elected captain and properly commissioned. They met a few times, but the whole thing fell through, the act being re- pealed, and since then militarism has been at a low ebb. POLITICAI, PARTIES. Party spirit has always run pretty high, each partisan seem- ing to think, at any rate act, as though, the welfare of the country hinged upon his individual action, and each party could only be satisfied as they succeeded in downing the other fellows, but inuch of the time it was "nip and tuck," sometimes one, then the other; and so, of course, the country was on the high road to success, or otherways ruin was imminent. The ordinary voter neither knew nor cared for any of the principles underlying our country's needs. They were simply true-blue Democrats or iron-clad Whigs. Both parties were opposed to the so-called Abolitionists, and the leaders did not mean to allow such disturbers of the peace as Parker Pillsbury, or any of that kind of lecturers to even speak in town, and they mobbed Mr. .Pillsbury, using such convincing arguments as eggs that had been kept too long for other uses, and he had to make his escape as best he could to save life and limb. Persecution of this sort^ only fed the fires of the anti-slavery party. I could name the parties who thus determined to .squelch free discus- sion, but I think it hardly necessary. > The division of the parties usually carried the greater bulk •of the family of that name, as the Allis families were Democrats so were the Crafts and Dickinson families, and the Whites up to 1840. The Sandersons, descendants from Isaac, were all Democrats, while descendants of Deacon Thomas were Federal- ists, then Whigs ; the Frary families always affiliated with the Feds and then the Whigs ; the Beldens about evenly divided ; the Harwoods, Feds then Whigs ; the Browns were divided, as were the Bardwells and Graves; and so they run, and so they fought as bitteily as intense politicians could, even as to who should fill a town office. When the Abolitionists had secured some sixteen voters, all men of fine abilities who professed to be governed by high 303 moral influence and principlies, they would unite with the Dem- ocrats, and thus be able to outnumber the Whigs by about two votes. In 1842 Thomas Nash, an intelligent anti-slavery man, was run by the Democrats and Abolitionists and Deacon Justus White, who had gone over in the Hard Cider campaign from the Democrats to the Whigs, was his opponent, and everyone who could vote was on hand. The meeting was held at the old meeting-house I think, perhaps at the public house of Capt. I^uke Wells, but most probably at the meeting-house. The motion was made and put "That we do not send a representa- tive this year," and was declared carried. The vote being doubted the house was polled, and the vote not to send was neg- atived by two or three majority ; then the voting commenced in earnest. Each party then had several of their leading men to chal- lenge and also to insist upon the right of the challenged to exer- cise the right of franchise, and such displays of oratory and of ability to handle legal questions, and such pungent thrusts at each other of opposing counsel was seldom excelled by the bar of legal antagonists. Well tho result was that Mr. Nash was elected, but his seat was contested by Deacon White, and the facts in the case were obtained by a week's hearing at Whately, the Whigs employing Hon. George T. Davis to conduct their case, and a young Methodist minister was engaged by Mr. Nash, and the people turned out en masse to attend the trial. Mr. Nash retained his seat. Now what a change has come over the political world. There are no such hidebound partisans to the right of one man to hold in bondage his fellow man whether he has a black skin or not. Everyone now is an anti-slavery man. Going back further we had questions raised that had their day and were then dropped out. Among those that I recall dis- tinctly was the anti-raasonic raid; that was raised by the alleged abduction of Mr. Morgan. The excitement was intense, and I well recall the abusive language used against Masonry and against Masons. The threat was that if they didn't cease hold- ing their accursed conclaves the people would arise in their might, and if needful armed and equipped, and end their plot- ting to overthrow the liberties of the people. There were a nanlber of Masons among our residents, who by their quiet and" gentlem^iily course,- rather had a dampening 304 effect upon their hot-headed opponents, and here and there was found a common sense man who tried to pour oil on the troubled waters. These won the sobriquet of "Jack Masons," and were roundly abused by the anti-masons. Rev. John R. Goodnough, pastor of the Baptist church at the west part of Whately, was told by his local associates of ministers that he must renounce his Masonry or stop preaching in their fel- lowship. This he utterly declined to do and said to them : "Gen- tlemen. I have hitherto acted independently, and with the ap- proval of my conscience, and have never intentionally injured any one. You can stop me from preaching if you will, but I shall never give up my membership in Masonrj'." His parish was against him, and he sought other business. From that time began the downfall of that church. It lingered for a time, but the withdrawal of such men as Jonathan Smith, Chester Brown, Deacon James Smith and others sealed its destiny. The election of Gen. Jackson as president, and his action in removing the deposits from the United States bank, and the fight for that moneyed institution was the commencement of a series of events that have, as I think, led up to the division of the two great parties on the questions of finance and the estab- lishing of monopolies and great trusts. Against these are arrayed the old Democratic party, and so the fight goes on. I think that I will close this political history by quoting verbatim one of the songs the Abolitionists used to sing at their gatherings, with a gusto that was very charming. It was fur- nished me by Rev. Mr. Pillsbury. It is a parody on an old- time hymn as it used to be sung by a full-voiced choir at negro meetings, as well as at gatherings at the north : Come saints and sinners hear me tell How pious priests whip Jack and Nell, And women buy and children sell. Then preach all sinners down' to hell. And sing of heavenly union. They'll talk of Heaven and Christ's rewards. And bind his image with a cord, And scold and swing the lash abhorred. And sell their brother in the Lord To hand-cuffed heavenly union, 305 They'll church you if you sip a dram, And damn you if you steal a lamb, Yet rob old Tony, Doll and Sam Of human rights, and bread and ham; Kidnappers' heavenly union. They'll raise tobacco, corn and rye, And drive and thieve and cheat and lie. And lay up treasures in the sky By making whip and cowskin fly, In hope of heavenly union. They'll crack old Sambo on the skull. And preach and roar like Bashan's bull Or braying ass of mischief full ; Then seize old Jacob by the wool And pull for heavenly union. CHAPTER XVII. COPY OF VALUATION BOOK FOR THE YEAR iSlO, GIVING AI^ 13 20 32 3 4 4 68.50 I y-^ 15 4 2 2 6 28-53 2 3 34 30 70 3 2 6 129.70 II 2 I 17.00 I I 2 II 6 2 I 23.40 I I 2 II 6 2 23.40 2 II 6 2 23.40 14 5 16 I 18.22 I % 8 2 2 21.89 I 2 9 I I 2 2 15.46 I 2 42 58 53 I 2 2 109.18 3o8 Mowing Un- Builcl- unrl Acres Iiii- Hor- Ox- Reilaoed Polls ingH TU'ge Past're pr'd ses en Cows V'altiiition Frary, Isaac, 22 4 7122 $71.75 Frary, Seth, Jr., i 16 i 20.34 Frary, Dexter, 11 5 i ' 20.44 Frary, Maj. Phineas, i 3 29 no 40 3 4 5 116 80 Frary, Silas, 112 12 19.41 Frary, Horace, i i 5 i 12.50 Frary, Phineas, Jr., i ij^ 8 i 16.50 Field, Zenas, 3 2 22 36 100 223 80.15 Gibbs, Paul, 12 r i 14.40 Gunn, Dr. lyUther, i i 2.40 Gray, Nathaniel, i 2 9 20 9 2 22.40 Gilbert, Josiah, i 2 13 13 16 20.82 Graves, David, i 15 23 30 22.65 Graves, Moses, 2 3 14 2 45.68 Graves, Ivcvi, i i 15 23 30 2 1 44.03 Graves, Martin, 2 2 26 14 46 2 4 63.86 Graves, Capt. I/Ucius, I i 9 5 5 22.10 Graves, Simeon, 11 3^ 5 5 38.50 " Capt. Salmon, 3 3 3° 34 49 3 3 63.50 Graves, Dea. Oliver, 12 10 2 -41.60 Graves, Oliver, Jr., i 2 14 38 37 2 6 78.44 Graves, Elijah, i i 10 11 20 i 2 4i>58 Graves, John, ) Graves, Justus, j 35 I 2 42.60 Graves, Selah, '22 8 20 60 2 2 2 55-42 Graves, William, i 8 15 7 21.00 Graves, Erastus, i Graves, Plyna, 2 Graves, Reuben, i 2 15 20 12 3 2 3 39.54 Graves, Israel, 12 11 19.50 Graves, Perez, i i 14 7 25.10 Murray, Hart, i 2 12 13 5 i 1 32.10 Hill, Joseph, 2 1% 14 40 20 51.00 Hill, Moses, i J^ 7 20 10 3 28.44 Harwood, Dr. Fran's, 2 3 7 3° 45 2 2 59.18 Hastings, Nathaniel, 1277 i i 15.50 Hale, James, i i 1.20 Hicks, Nathan, r i 541 i 31.26 l/oomis, Jona. C, 2 money at interest, 18.00 Loomis, Abner, i 36^ Polls Marsh, Thomas, i Marsh, Isaac, i Morton, Daniel, 2 Morton, Sam'l, G., i Morton, Dea. I,evi, 3 Morton, Oliver, 3 Morton, Simeon, i Morton, Dexter, i Morton, Reuben, r Morton, Capt. Chas, i Morton, Consider, 2 Morton, Justin, 2 Morton, Lewis, 1 Moor, Otis, I Moor, Lewis, i Mather,Capt.W., 3 Mather, Joseph, i Mather, Samuel, i Munson, Moses, 2 Munson, Joel, 1 Munson, Reuben, 2 Mosher, Jacob, i Orcutt, Stephen, 2 Parmeter, John, i Parker, Benja'n, and son Asa, ''' Pratt, Capt. Amos, 2 Pierce, Jonathan, i Nash, Cotton, i Rogers. George, ) ^ Rogers, Daniel, j Ruddock, Justin, i Smith, Gad., Jr., i Smith, Bezaliel, 2 Smith, Gad, i Smith, Joseph, i Smith Seth, ) Smith, David, j ^ Smith, Capt. Rufus, i Smith, Dea. James, i Buiin- IngH and Til'ge Acres iiii- Past'ie pr'd Hor- ses Ox. en Cows Reduced Valuation I $ -90 I .90 2 20 10 74 I 2 53-60 2 21 47 38 I 2 4 83.76 6 29 60 70 2 5 133-72 3 15 10 10 2 2 65.26 2 20 20 40 I I 44-74 2 7 12 17 I 3 32.40 18 I 2 4 18.16 9 15 17.28 3 28 50 53 2 2 4 101.98 3 22 41 37 I 2 3 87.40 5 5 4 I I 11-75 3 24 9 29 2 I I 108.46 1. 14 5 3 4 II 29 2 44.09 I 7 I 16.44 3 10 26 9 2 2 3 48-93 I I 1. 14 money at interest 2 2 24.60 I 'A ; I 2.40 2 21 12 2 42.98 3 4 8 33 2 r 57-17 money at interest. 18.00 I 10 10.60 2 12 34 36 I 44.67 3 16 16 80 3 2 3 77-58 2 20 72 69 2 3 94.20 2 12 28.00 3 65 6 40 I 4 6 129.40 2 13 35 82 I 2 3 60.85 3 7 II 4. I I 75.30 310 I Polls Suilcl- ngs and Til'ge Acres Past'ie iui- pr'd Hor- ses Ox- en Cows Reduced Valuation Scott, Benjamin, 4 I I 5 I 63.30 Scott, Consider, I 2 9 5 12 I 14.80 Scott, Lt. Abel, and son Abel, Jr., 3 2 62 28 72 2 3 2 129.53 Scott, Selah, I 2 40 38 8 2 2 2 76.26 Scott, Israel, I 2 44 26 30 2 I 77.28 Sanderson, Elijah, I 2 44 26 30 2 I 62.53 Sanderson, Asa, 2 2 8 17 6 r 2 77.28 Sanderson, Isaac, I 3 14 9 10 2 35-30 Sanderson, Luther, I 2 I I I 11.64 Sanderson, Elijah, 2d 2 \ I T 11.32 " Maj. Thos., 2 2 29 20 44 2 3 80.66 " Dea. Thos., 2 5 46 30 214 3 4 8 271.96 Sanderson, Chester, 40 28.80 Starks, John, 2 13 5 2 2 17.80 Stockbridge, David, 6 61 18 I 4 120.14 Stiles, Capt. Henry, 2 17 15 20 43.58 Wright, Seth, interest money I 12.12 Waite, Joel, ist, 2 7 22 6 I 14.20 Waite, Joel, 2d, 3 28 90 2 2 70.80 Waite, Joel, 3d, I ■90 Waite, Aaron, I 22 1 1 15.96 Waite, Luke, 30 10 2 I 18.90 Waite, Jeremiah, Sr. I 9 20 25 I 3 63.60 Waite, Nathan, I 9 20 25 I 3 37-12 Waite, Benjamin, 2 3 2 20.52 Waite, EHhu, 2 16 6 26 3 29.48 Waite, Calvin, 20 I I 18.48 Waite, Capt. Luther ) ^ 20 I I 18.48 Waite, Consider, 3 2 18 39 20 2 4 70.22 Waite, Jonathan, 4 3 14 18 2 34.64 Woods, Martin, 4 2 4-48 Woods, Jonathan, Wing, William, Wells, Perez, 2 ID 2 13 I 3 24.00 Wells, Chester, and interest money 15.00 Wells, CaLvin, Wells, Israel, I I 2 2 10.00 Wells, Thomas, I 4 8 4 6 33-55 Wells, Capt. Luke, I ri 8 4 I 30.17 311 Mowing Un- Build- anfl Acres im- Hor- Ox- Reducert Polls ings Til'ge Past're pr'd ses en Cows Valuation White, Capt. S., | i and son, John, J 2 White, Salmon, Jr. ) and son, Justus, ) 3 2 I 39 21 9 80 69 25 94 70 2 2 2 7 2 6 3 205.56 120.37 231 2162 2795 3933 165 117 307 $8,643:47 Other cattle as enumerated 619. Sheep and swine not enumerated. Amount of reduced valuation, $8,643.47. If the reduced value was six per cent, the whole valuation was $146,058.50. The reduced valuation was then divided, giving to the Con- gregational church for taxation, $6,785.47. To the Baptist church for taxation, 1,858.00. Polls paid for state and county tax, $0.42. Polls paid for minister's tax, $0.52. Polls paid for town tax, $1,30. One dollar in town tax, $0.02. One dollar in minister's tax, $0.02 8-10. Number of acres set to residents, 8,890. Number of acres set to non-residents, 1,85234^. Of which, mowing and tillage to residents, 2,162 acres. Of pasturage, 2,795 acres. Of unimproved (wood land), 3,933 acres. Total number of acres taxed, 10,7421 /i- Buildings, houses not specified as all buildings are together. The horses, 165. The oxen, 117. The cows, 307. The other stock cattle, 619. The number giving interest money, 20. Rev. Rufus Wells not taxed, and several aged men not taxed for the poll. The money at interest was mostly held by young men just come of age, and in order to exercise the right of suffrage some one would give them a note for a sum sufficient to enable them to vote. At that time politics ran pretty high and every young partisan's vote must be secured. I recollect of hearing old men tell who helped them with a note to enable them to vote. 312 COPY OF A CHECK 1, 1ST OF Allis, Dea. Russell, Elijah, Daniel. Stalham, Daniel, Jr., Osee, Anderson, Henry, Atkins, Solomon, Enoch, Henry, Bardwell, Lieut. Noah, Cotton, " Justin, Orange, Chester, " Asa, " Ebenezer, Barnard, Ebenezer, " Ebenezer, Jr., William. Bartlett, Zebina, " Samuel, Belden, Elisha, " Dickinson, Seth, ' ' Augustus, " Francis, " Reuben, " Aaron, ' ' Joshua, " Joseph, Chester, Brown, Lieut. John, Isaiah, " Daniel, " Joseph, Chapman, Isaac, Clark, Peter, Coleman, Nathaniel, Cooley, Benjamin, " Lemuel, VOTERS IN WHATELY IN 1816. Crafts, Thomas, Rufus, John, Asa, Cotton, " Erastus, Seth, ' ' Graves, Israel, David, " Moses, Cutter, James, Dickinson, Alpheus, Charles, Oliver, Asa, " Daniel, Giles, Dexter, " Eurotus, Frary, Maj. Phineas, " Thomas, ■' Orange, Silas, " Horace, " Phineas, Jr., Capt. Seth, Capt. Seth, Jr., Dexter, " Isaac, " Asa, Field, Zenas, " \ John, Graves, Erastus, Oliver, Jr., ' ' Moses, Levi, " Martin, " Capt. Lucius, Linus, " Rowland, 313 Graves, Capt. Salmon, Oliver, John, " Reuben, " Ensign Pliny, " Charles, " Salah, " Spencer, William, Israel, Gerry, Stephen, Gray, Nathaniel, Grimes, Samuel, Gilbert, Josiah, Harwood, Dr. Francis, " Dr. Joshua D., Col. Roderick B., Hastings, Nathan, Hill, Joseph, " Ruggles, Jenfiey, Reuben, Loomis, Jonathan C, William, Morton, Justus, Horace, David, Samuel G., " Ivieut. Oliver, " Dea. Levi, " Simeon, ' ' Dexter, Reuben, Consider, Charles, " Arnold, " Justin, ' ' Sylvester, Marsh, Thomas, " Isaac, Mosher, Jacob, Mather, Capt. William, " Joseph, Munson, Moses, Reuf)en, Joel, John, Nichols, Daniel, Perry, Ira, Parker, Lieut. Asa, " Isaac, Pratt, Capt. Amos, , Russell, Levi, Rogers, George, ' ' Daniel, Reed, Simeon, Ruddock, Edward, Smith, James, Bezaliel, " - Gad, Gad, Jr.. Horace, Seth, ' ' David, " Justin, Capt. Rufus, Sanderson, Thomas, Silas, Eli, " Ensign Elijah, Asa, Asa, Jr., " Isaac, Scott, Israel, Aretas, " Benjamin, Lieut. Abel, Abel, Jr., " Ambrose, Selah, Stockbridge, David, Jr., Starks, John, Waite, Joel, ist, Joel, 2d, Luke, 314 Waite, Jeremiah, " Benjamin, Elihu, Calvin, " Consider, " Jonathan, " I/cmuel, " James, " Henry, ' ' Thomas, Wells, Perez, Luther, " Rev. Rufus, In all one hundred and ninety-five legal voters. A LIST OF NAMES, WHO IN l8l2 WERE ASSESSED BY THE TOWN, AND THE AMOUNT PAID TO THE BAPTIST SOCIETY BY THE TOWN TREASURER, AND THE TAX OF EACH. Wells, Calvin, Chester, " Capt. Thomas, " lyieut. I/Uke, " Israel, Winchell, Reuben, Warner, Luther, Woods, Martin, " Jonathan, White, John, Salmon, " Justus, AUis, 'Russell, $ -77 Munson, Joel, $r^'3 Daniel, 2.09 Morton, Dexter, T.29 Daniel, Jr., ■94 Reuben Osee, •37 and Simon, 1. 10 Brown, Lieut. John, 6.43 Pratt, Capt. Amos, 2.15 Prescott, .87 Rogers, Geo. and Daniel, 1.85 Spencer, 1.23 Smith, Bezdid, 1.80 " Isaiah, 2.64 Seth, 2^95 " Daniel, 1-45 David, 1. 10 Bardwell, Lieut. Noah, 2.08 Capt. Rufus, 2.20 Orange, 1. 14 Sanderson, Isaac, 1,66 Chester, 1-45 Waite, Joel, ist. .42 Charles, 1.79 Joel, 3d, •53 Cotton, 2.07 ' ' Obadiah , .90 Justin, 2.04 Elihu, .84 Belden, Seth, ■85 Luther, .84 Crafts, Elijah, .62 Calvin, .68 Cutter, James, •95 Rufus, •47 Chapman, Isaac, •44 ' ' Consider, 2.35 Graves, John and Justin, , J .53 " Jonathan, 1.04 Gerry, Stephen, .42 Winchell, Reuben, •37 Hill, Joseph, 2.32 Hill, Moses, 1.20 Total amount. $61.81 Munson, Moses, 1.20 315 STATISTICS OF POPULATION, ETC., FROM 1771 TO 1899, COM- PILED FROM THE CENSUS RETURNS. 1 77 1. Number of males over i6 years, 75 ; total population, estimated, 320. Number of dwelling houses, 40 ; number of families, 48. 1776. Total white population, according to Colonial cen- sus, 410. 1786. Number of males over 16 years, 141; total popula- tion, estimated, 544; number of dwelling houses, 68. 1790. Number of males under 16, 199 ; over 16, 184; num- ber of females, 352 ; total, 735 ; number of dwelling houses, 120; number of families, 130. 1800J Total number of inhabitants, 773. 1810. Number of males, 433; number of females, 457; total, 890. 1820. Total number of inhabitants, 1,076. 1830. Number of males, 573; number of females, 538; total', 1, 1 1 1. 1840. Total number of inhabitants, 1,072 ; number of polls ratable, 291 ; number of polls not ratable, 19 ; number of dwell- ing houses, 168 ; number of barns, 160. 1850. Total number of inhabitants, 1,129. i860. Number of males 544; number of females, 513; total, 1,057; 2 females over 90; dwellings, 216; families, 227. 1865. Number of males, 538; number of females, 474; total, 1,012; I female over 100; dwellings, 222 ; families, 223. 1870. Total number of inhabitants, 1,068. 1890. Total number of inhabitants, 779. DEATHS. 1771 to '81, 70; 1781 to '91, 64; 1791 to 1801, 92; 1801 to 'II, 107; 181 1 to '21, 151 ; 1821 to '31, 165; 1831 to '41, 131; 1841 to '51, r66; 1851 to '61, 209; 1861 to '71, 198; 1871 to '81, 150; 1881 to '91, 163; 1891 to '99, 126; total for 128 years, 1,982. Died under 5 years, 571 ; between 70 and 80 years, 222; between 80 and 90 years, 175; between 90 and too years 23; over 100 years, i. VALUATION, ACCORDING TO OFFICIAL RETURNS. 1830, $206,858. 1840, $220,927. 1850, $438,772. i860, $624,902. 1865, $665,972. 1870, $802,511. 1882, $440,124. 3i6 SBI,ECTMEN, FROM THE INCORPORATION OP THE TOWN. John Waite, 1771. Simeon Waite, 1771. Edward Brown, 1771. Philip Smith, 1771, '72. Salmon White, i77i-'75, '77, '78, '84-'86, '90-'92, '94; 14 years. Noah Wells, r772-'75, '78, '82, '83, '88; 8 years. - David Scott, 1772. Elisha Frary, 1772^ '80. Thomas Sanderson, i773-'75, '77, '78, ■83-'87, '89, '90, '92-'96, '98-1803, 'i2-'i7; 29 years. Oliver Graves, 1776, '77. Joseph Belden, Jr., 1776, '77, '83. John Smith, 1776, '77, '80, '87-'89. Perez Chapin, 1780. Silas Smith, 1781. Noah Bardwell, 1781, '90, '91. '93> '96. David Graves, Jr., 1781, '82. Col. Josiah Allen, 1783- '89, 'gi-'93; 10 years. Maj. PhineasFrary, i794-'99, i8o3-'6, '9, 'iz-'is; 15 years. Asa Sanderson, 1795, 1803- '5, '12, '13; 6 years. John White, 1795, '98-1800, '2-' II ; 14 years. Capt. Seth Frary, 1800, 'i, '2, '4, '5, '14, '15; 7 years. I^evi Morton, 1801, '3. Bezaliel Smith, 1804, '5, '11. Gideon Dickinson, 1806-' 8, '10, '11. Zenas Field, 1807, '8, '10, 'II, '(6. Oliver Graves, jr., 1809, '16, '18, '19. Capt. Rufus Smith, 181 1. Consider Morton, 1812, '13. Capt. Salmon Graves, 1812, '13- Oliver Morton, 1814, '15, '16. i Orange Bardwell, 1814, '15. Lemuel Waite, 1816, '18. Isaac Frary, 1817, '19. Silas Frary, 1817, '18, '20. Seth Smith, i8i9-'2i, '24- '27; 7 years. Thomas Crafts, i82o-'22, '25, '28, '30, '32-'36; II years. Capt. William Fay, i82i,'29. Charles Morton, 1822. Dea. James Smith, 1822. David Stockbridge, i823-'26, '28, '31, '40, '43; 8 years. Dea. Justus White, 1823, '24, '31- Dexter Morton, 1823. Dr. Chester Bardwell, 1826. Calvin Wells, 1827, '35-'39, '45 ; 7 years. David Saunders, 1827. , Daniel Brown, 1828, '29, '30, '45- lycvi Bush, Jr., 1829. Capt. Ivuke Wells, 1830. Chester Brown, i83i-'36, '40, '41 ; 8 years. Luke B. White, 1832, '33, '34- Hiram Smith, i837-'39, '46, '55, '61 ; 6 years. 3t7 J. C. Sanderson, 1837, '44, '45 > '49. 50; 5 years. Arnold Morton, 1838, '39, '43. '44. '57. '41 ; 6 years. Dexter Crafts, 1 840. Rufus Graves, 1841, '46, '61. Stalham Allis, 1841. Rodolphus Sanderson, 1842, '47- Plyna Graves, 1842. Capt. Sett Bardwell, 1842, '51- Lyman Dickinson, 1843, '44, '55- Daniel F. Morton, 1846. Thomas Waite, 1847, '49, '50, '52, '53; five years. Samuel B. White, i848-'50, '52, '53, '56, '57. '6i-'66, '68, ,69; 15 years. John Field, 1848. Abel W. Nash, 1848. Capt. Asa Parker, 1851. Stephen Belden, 1852, '53, '59- Elliott C. Allis, 1854. Zebina W. Bartlett, 1854, '67. Isaac Frary, Jr., 1854. James M. Crafts, 1855. Rufus Dickinson, 1856, '57, '59, '69- J. W. C. Allis, 1856, '68, '69. Alonzo Crafts, 1857, '60, '62,- '64, '67; 6 years. Alfred Belden, 1858. Dennis Dickinson, 1858. Edwin Bardwell, i858-'6o, '62-'67, '70, '71; II years. L. W. Hannum, i860, '61. Elihu Belden, 1865. EliphasH. Wood, 1866. Harvey Moor, 1868. Samuel Lesiire, 1870. Samuel C. Wood, 1870. Elbridge G. Crafts, 1871. David Ashcraft, 1871. Silas W. Allis i872-'8i; 10 years, Dennis Dickinson, 1872. Edwin Bardwell, 1872, '73, '79; 14 years. Elbridge G. Crafts, 1873. Chester K. Waite, i874-'78, 5 years. Elliott C. Allis, 1874. Seth Bardwell, 1874, '75. Hiram Bardwell, 1877, '78, '80. Chester G. Crafts, i88i-'84; 5 years. Elliott A. Warner, i88i-'85; 5 years. Rufus M. Swift, 1879, '84- '89, '91 ; 8 years. Salmon P. White, 1880. Wilham Barnard, 1882, '83. Franklin D. Belden, 1886, '89; 4 years. Lyman A. Crafts, 1886, '.89; 4 years. Frank Dickinson, 1890. David Ashcraft, 1890, '95; 6 years. Charles E. Bardwell, 1890. Seth B. Crafts, 1 891 -1900; 9 years. Victor D. Bardwell, 1892- '97; 5 years. Lemuel F. Graves, r897, '98. Willis F. Waite, 1897, '98, '99- George F. Pease, 1899. 3f8 TOWN CLERKS, FROM I771 TO 1900. Salmon White, ijji-'jg; 8 years. Dr. Perez Chapin, 1780, '81. Thomas Sanderson, i782-'86, 'Sg-'gS, 1800, 'i ; 17 years. Col. Josiah AUis, 1787, '88. Dr. Benj. Dickinson, 1799. William Mather, 1802, '9, '12, '13; 9 years. . Elijah AUis, 1810, '11. Thomas Wells, 1814. Luke Wells, 1815, '25; 11 years. Edward Phelps, 1826. Chester Wells, 1827, '30. Martin Woods, 1831, '32. Eurotus Morton, 1833, '34. Dr. Myron Harwood, 1835, '36, '38-'4i; 6 years. Stalham Allis, 1837. Samuel I/^sure, i842-'56, '6o-'7i ; 27 years. Dennis Dickinson, 1857, '58, '59- Samuel Lesure, i872-'82; in all 37 years. ■ Dr. James D. Seymour, 1882- '91 ; 9 years. George A. Elder, 1891-1900; 9 years. TOWN TREASURERS, FROM 1771 TO 190Q. Salmon White, i77i-'79; 8 years. Dr. Perez Chapin, 1780, '81. Thomas Sanderson, i782-'86, '92-1802. Josiah Allis, i787-'90. Elijah Smith, 1791. Bezaliel Smith, 1803. Solomon Adkins, Jr., 1804- '8, '15, '16. Jehu Dickinson, 1809-'! i. Samuel Grimes, 1812, '13. William Mather, 1814. Oliver Morton, 1817, '18, '21, '23- Lemuel Waite, 1819, '20. Luther Wells, 1822. Calvin Wells, i824-'28. • Col. Caleb Crafts, 1829. Leonard Loomis, 1830, '31, '33. '45. '69; 5 years. Levi Bush, Jr., 1834, '35. Eurotus Morton, 1832, '36, '37- Charles D. Stockbridge, 1838, '40. Samuel B. White, i84i-'44, '48; 5 years. Elliott C. Allis, 1841, '58, '63, '64. Franklin Graves, 1847, '52, '53- Rufus Graves, 1849. James M. Crafts, 1850, '61, '71- John White, 1851. Zebina Bartlett, 1855, '57, '59- Henry K. White, 1856, '59, '60. S. E. Allis, 1862. Horace B. Fox, 1865. Apollos Clary, 1866. E. H. Wood, 1867. 319 Edward C. Sanderson, 1868. Elbridge G. Crafts, 1870. James M. Crafts, 1872; in all 5 years. Caleb Iv. Thayer, 1873, George D. Bartlett, 1874, '75. Perez M. Wells, i876-'78, '83, '84; 4 years. Horace B. Fox, 1879. William Barnard, 1880, '81, '82 ; 3 years. Stalham E. Allis, 1885. Chester K. Waite, 1886, '87, '88, '89 ; 4 years. Micajah Howes, 1890, '91, '92, '93. '94. '95 ; 6 years. Rj-land C. Howes, 1896, '97, '98. '99; 4 years. ASSESSORS, FROM THE INCORPORATION OF THE TOWN. Edward Brown, 1771. Philip Smith, 1771, '72, '95. Capt. Salmon White, 177*1, •82, '84-'86, '90, '92, '94; - 18 years. Elisha Frary, 1772. Thomas Sanderson, 17^3, '74, '77-'79> 82. '84-'86, '89, '9i:-'94. '99. 1800, '2, 'i2-'i4; 27 years. Israel Graves, 1 793-' 96. Noah Wells, 1773, '74, '78, '79, '82, '83, '88. Benjamin Smith, 1775, '76. Oliver Graves, 1776. JohnSmith, i775-'77. '87. '89- Amos Marsh, 1780. Noah Bardwell, 1781, '87, '90, '91. '94-'96; 7 years. Joseph Belden, Jr., 1781, '83. Josiah Allis, i783-'93; loy'rs. Phineas Frary, 1794, '99- 1802, '5; 7 years. Asa Marsh, Jr., 1796. John White, 1797, '98, 1801,' '5- Dr. Francis Harwood, 1797. WilUam Mather, 1 797-1807, '9 ; 12 years. I/cmuel Wells. 1798. Jonathan Smith , Jr . , 1 803- ' 06 . Seth Frary, 1805. Asa Sanderson, 1805, '13. Bezaliel Smith, 1805. Elijah Allis, i8o7-'ii. Isaac Frary, 1808, '10, '11. Charles Bardwell, 18 10, 'it. Thomas Crafts, 1812, '30. Orange Bardwell, 18 12, '13. Thomas Wells, 1813, 'i5-'20, '26. Silas Frary, i8i4-'i6, '19. Ebenezer Barnard, 1814, '15. Dexter Morton, 1816, '19, '21, '31. Chester Wells, 1817, '18, '25, '27-'29. Seth Smith, 1817, '18, '22, '23, '28, '29, '32, '34. David Stockbridge, 1820. Daniel Brown, 1820, '25, '26, '30. , David Saunders, i82i-'25. Asa Dickinson, 1821. Justus White, 1822. Edward Phelps, 1823, '24. Chester Brown, 1824. Charles Morton, 1826. Capt. WilliamFay, 1827, '31. Elijah Sanderson, 1827. Arnold Morton, 1828, '29, '36, •38. 320 Luke Wells, 1830. Eurotas Dickinson, 1831, '32, '33- Abel W. Nash, 1832, '47. Asa Sanderson, Jr., 1833, '45. Rodolphus Sanderson, 1833, '35, '36, '39, '40, '45, '56; 7 years. Dexter Crafts, 1834, '35. Col. Caleb Crafts, 1834. Capt. Seth Bardwell, 1835, '62. Thomas Waite, 1836, '46. Calvin Wells, 1837, '38, '47. John C. Sanderson, 1837, '43, '57, '62 ; 4 years. Hiram Smith, iH37-'39, '42, '48, '50, '57, '57; 8 years. I^eonard Loomis, 1839, '40, '42, '59- Dennis Dickinson, 1840, '41, '43. Reuben Jenney, 1841. John B. Morton, 1841, '45. Alfred Belden, 1842, '54. Samuel Dickinson, 1843, '44. Justin R. Smith, 1844. Josiah AUis, 1844, '46. Samuel B. White, 1846, '61. Elliott C. AUis, 1847, '52, '53, '60. John L. Morton, 1848. Jabez Pease, 1848. Lewis Wells, 1849. Charles D. Stockbridge, 1849- '51, '60, '65, '65; 6 years. Franklin Graves, 1849. Rufus Graves, 1850, '51. Isaac Frary, Jr., 1852, '53. Zebina W. Bartlett, 1852, '53, '58. Porter Wells, 1854. E. S. Munson, 1854, '56. Aaron S. Stearns, 1855. William C. Smith, 1855, '60. Charles D. Crafts, 1855. Henry K. White, 1856, '57. L. W. Hannum, 1857. Harvey, Moor, 1858. - George W. Crafts, 1858, '64. ' Edwin W. Warner, 1859. Dr. Chester Bardwell, i860, '63- Paul W. Field, 1861, '64-'66, '70, '71. Samuel C. Wood, 1861. Edwin M. Belden, 1862. Eurotas Morton, 1863, '67, '68, '69. Alvin N. Claghorn, 1863, '64. Chester Bardweil, Jr., 1863. James M. Crafts, 1865, '66, '71- Edward C. Sanderson, 1867, '68, '69, '71. Myron Brown, 1867, '68, '69. Chester K. Waite, .1870. Edwin C. Parker, 1870. James M. Crafts, 1872, '73, '80, '83, '84, '85; in all 9 years. Paul W. Field, 1872, '73, '74, '77, '78, '81, '82, '83, '85, '86 ; 10 years. Edward C. Sanderson, 1872, '73> '77. '79. '81 ; 5 years. John Donovan, 1879, '81, '82; 3 years. George W. Crafts, 1874, '75. George D. Bartlett, 1874. Albert Bartlett, 1875, '76. Erastus S. Munson, 1875. Rufus Dickinson, 1876. Hiram Eardwell, 1876. 321 Chester G. Crafts, 1877, '78, '80. Franklin D. Belden, 1884. George N. Smith, 1884. Edmond B. Crafts, 1885. William Cutler Smith, 1883, '86, '90. George R. Graves, 1886, '87. Victor D. Bardwell, 1887, '88, '89, '90; 4 years. Edmond A. BeWen, 1887, '88. George A. Elder, 1888, '89, '92, '93. '94; 5 years. REPRESENTATIVES TO THE GENERAL COTJrT John Smith, 1783. Elijah AUis, 1839. Thomas Sanderson, 1784, Thomas Nash, 1842. Warren P. Crafts, 1890, '91. Arthur H. Jenney, 1891. George F. Pease, 1881, '92, '93- Willis F. Waite, 1892, '93, '94, '95. '96 ; 5 years. Michael J. HoUoran, 1894, '95. '96, '97. '98, '99; 6 years- Charles H. Waite, 1895, '96, '97. '98, '99; 5 years. Cooley B. Dickinson, 1897, '98, '99 ; 3 years. 1812, '13. Capt. Salmon White, 1785. Col. Josiah Allis, 1787, '88. Maj. Phineas Frary, 1805, '8, '10, '14. John White, 1825. Rev. I,, p. Bates, 1829. David Stockbridge, 1830. Thomas Crafts, 1831; May and November. Capt. Luke Wells, 1832. Chester Brown, 1833. Leander Clark, 1834, '40. Calvin Wells, 1835. Asa Dickinson, i 36. Rodolphus Sanderson, 1837. Samuel B. White, 1838, '46. Jabez Pease, 1844. Dr. Chester Bardwell, 1847, '48. '51- Deacon Justus White, 1849. Abel W. Nash, 1852. Josiah Allis, 1853. Edwin Bardwell, 1854. Hiram Smith, 1855. William H. Fuller, 1858, '59. I,. W. Hannum, r86i. Capt. Seth Bardwell, 1864. Alfred Belden, 1868. Seth B. Crafts, 1871. Eliphas H. Wood, 1875. Chester K. Waite, 1879. Silas W. Allis, 1882, '83. George A. Elder, 1892. DELEGATES TO CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTIONS. Col. Josiah Allis was delegate to the convention to ratify the Federal- constitution in 1788, and on the vote of acceptance, he voted "No." Deacon Thomas Sanderson was delegate to the convention to revise the constitution of Massachusetts, 1820. Josiah Allis was delegate to the convention to revise the constitution in 1851. CHAPTER XVIII. STOCKADE. On page 6i of Temple's history is an account of tlie build- ing of the fort or stockade enclosing the premises of Deacon Joel Dickinson. Evidently Mr. Temple was not properly in- formed as to its location, as it was not where the house of Calvin Wells stands. It is however true that it enclosed the buildings of Deacon Joel Dickinson which were near the south side of the farm. As I desired to obtain all the information I could in regard to the stockade I secured the services of Mr. Porter Wells, who was born on the farm in 1813, and then sev- enty-five years of age, and together we went to the spot where he said the old cellar hole was in his boyhood days and which is now discernable. He had helped his father plow in the cellar and helped to fill in the well within a couple of feet or such a matter, then he planted an apple tree in the upper portion of the well, filling good soil around the tree. He helped me to make the measurements which are as fol- lows : From the well to the east line of Chestnut Plain street, one hundred and nine feet; from the well to the east side of the cellar, thirty feet ; from the well to the south line of the original farm, seventy-two feet. The house, long known as the Fergu- son house, was built by Asa Smith very near the north line of the lot bought of Rev. Rufus Wells. Since the place has been owned by other parties I think Eurotus Morton bought a strip, some thirty feet wide, to enable him to get around his buildings and also to make a better looking front yard. Mr. Wells assisted me in properly marking the site and gave me the privi- 323 lege of setting up a suitable stone as a monument to mark tie site. Indeed, we worked together. He furnishing his oxen and stone boat to draw the stone to fill the excavation to place the monument upon, and George W. Moor came with horses and contributed the pedestal which he brought from his house, and then drew the yellow flint boulder from Spruce Hill road. Then this was suitably marked, "Site of stockade, 1754-1888." . A meeting of the citizens of this and adjoining towns was held 19 Sept., 1888, at the Town hall, presided over by Lyman A. Crafts, Esq. Addresses were made by Jame:* M. Crafts, followed by Hon. George Sheldon of Deerfield, his topic being relative to the Indians of New England ; then they adjourned for a collation served in the vestry of the Congregational church. After reassembling sprightly speeches were made by Thaddeus Graves, Silas G. Hubbard, Daniel W. Wells, Esqrs., and Rev. R. M. Wood, of Hatfield; Rev. Eugene M. Frary of Colraine, and Rev. W. C. Curtis of Whately. An excellent choir, under the leadership of Micajah Howes, furnished fine vocal music, and the Whately brass band also contributed largely to the success of the celebration. A large and enthusiastic audience filled the hall even to standing room. In every way the meet- ing was a success, largely due to the labors of the committee in charge. As all the expense attending this was borne by Mr. Crafts, he now says, "That on account of its success the citizens kindly passed in their money to an extent that nearly equaled the expenditure, without solicitation. The first dollar came from that public-spirited man, E. F. Orcutt, while others over- whelmed by the success, even against many expressed doubts, gathered about the writer and thanked hira for what had been done and nailed their thanks by financial assistance towards the expenses." The remarks by Mr. Crafts were published and we will give a short extract: "In attempting to give a historical sketch of the early settlement of this town we are met at the outset with the difficulty of finding documentary material from which we can weave our history. Our only resource is to draw upon the memory of aged individuals who, in the days gone by, have heard the fathers relate the story of their trials and their perse- vering efforts to overcome the difficulties that lay thick in their pathway. It was not simply the taking up of new land, build- ing houses and barns in peace and security ; all about him was to be found the hostile Indian, waiting and watching for an 324 opportunity to steal upon him and secure his scalp, and thus add to the list of such blood}' trophies that ornamented his dis- tant wigwam. "To secure our hardy ancestry from harm we find that forts and stockades weie erected. War was almost continuous be- tween France and England and this, of course, opened the flood gates of war between their dependencies, Canada and New England. The last of these wars was from 1754 to 1763, and our little settlement cast about for some means of safety and de- fense. In 1754. it was determined to build a stockade about the buildings of Deacon Dickinson. This was done, probably under the direction of Col. Israel Williams of Hatfield, then in com- mand of the Hampshire county troops, who was experienced in the construction of means of defense against the attacks of the Indians, and it is claimed that while he directed, the citizens of Hatfield assisted our people in the construction of the stockade. The stockade is supposed to have surrounded from one-half to three- fourths of an acre of ground. It was built of hewed logs set firmly in the ground and securely fastened on the inside by stout poles fastened by substantial pins so that no single post could be removed. In times of alarm or danger the families fled to the stockade. Here their cows and other stock were brought and kept until the danger was over. I have heard old Great-aunt Martha Crafts say that she had lived in the fort for two weeks at a time and helped to milk the cows. She was born 28 May, 1748, and died 28 August, 1836, and would have been fourteen years old before the war was over. Her memory of the fort was full and perfect, and from her I learned much. 'Why,' she said, 'Our cows, horses and pigs were all there and those of the other neighbors.' My father, born in 1781, had often heard all the details of life in the fort, and Uncle Perez Wells, a Revolutionary soldier, and many others from whom we gathered much of the information that we have obtained. "There was another stockade about -the house of Joseph Belden that stood where now is what we call Bartlett's Corner. Of its size I have no knowledge, but it was large enough to afford protection for the families of Benjamin Scott, Josiah Scott, Jr., David Graves, Elisha Smith, John Waite and any others living near, with their stock. Each family while in the fort appeared to have a domicile of their own and, notwithstand- ing the danger, the young people had great times together." 325 COPY OF OLD LETTERS. We give here a letter written by Weutenant Abel Scott of Whately, wbile in the Revolutionary army, to his "betrothed sweetheart," Miss Martha Graves, a daughter of David Graves, Jr., of Whately: Irvington, N. Y., 15 Oct., 1780. "I having a opertunity, I cannot forbear riting to let you know that I through the goodness of god, I am well as I hope these lines will find you and the rest of friends and acquainteces. Sept. the 6th I reseived about ten of the clock at night a letter from you which was pleasant and was very good to hear from you for it came very unexpected to me sent th^e and for the notis that you had in writing. I am very much obliged to you for it aspeshally for that branch of doing my duty. Your cor- shon is good, but needless. And as for news we have a plenty concerning the afares of the enemy, but that don't concern you very much, but I will give you a few hints of the afare of Sept. the twenty-six. General Arnul deserted to the enemy and the agedant general of the british army came out as a Spy and he is in our hands at present, and a Capt. of the same tropes is with him. And so no more concerning the enemy. "But for the afare of the flesh pleasing life we have fruit, apples and peaches very good, and good sider, but the best of all are the duck gates are very plenty so that there (here are a few words that I can't decipher). Graves Crafts desires to be remembered to you and all the rest that inquire after him aspa- shilly to Joan and tell her that he cannot forget her how that he did in old times. The hole that went from Whately sends their complyments to you and all the rest that inquire after them, aspeshally to the girls. So no more at present. I remain your well wisher, ABEL SCOTT. I desire to be remembered to Mr. Eleazer Frary and to his frow, and let them know that I am well." I have a letter written by Paul Belden, who was irf Capt. John Burke's company, expedition to Canada, 1759, one hun- dred and forty years ago : Camp at Albany, May 29, 1759. loving brother and sister after my love to you and your children hoppin thes lynes will find you in good helth as tha leav me through the goodness of God and some of our men have 326 gon up the mohork river cutten. And when we shall march from this place we dont no. We have mete a noufe and that is good some butter and rise today and thare wasaman shot to deth for desartion which was a orfful site to se. And I would have you remember me en your prays that god wold cep me from all danger and return me en safety to my frinds and quantans agan. And I reman your loovin Brother and well Wisher PAUIv BELDING. (his hand) ESCAPE OF SERGEANT O'CONNEtL. Among the soldiers in the 27th Regt. of Infantry were a number of Whately boys, prominent among them Bartholomew O'Connell. He was killed at the battle of Southwest Creek, 8 March, 1865, while in command of his company, being then the ranking sergeant. The commissioned ofiScers were either wounded or away on detached service. Bartie, as we all knew him, was a bright, .scholarly boy and a general favorite in Whately. He was taken prisoner at Drury's Bluff in Virginia, in 1863. The prisoners were placed in a freight car and started for Andersonville, Ga. After they left Augusta, Ga.'j- Sunday, 29 May, 1863, Sergt. O'Connell set to work with others to cut a hole through the bottom of the car with the view of escaping. There was a guard of three confederate soldiers in the car, but a number stood up so as to screen them from the view of the guard and they worked diligently. They succeeded in getting the hole large enough to let a man through when they stopped. Three of them slipped out and escaped to the woods, his com- panions being Corporal Brizee and Private Taylor. The plan they first formed was to strike north towards Nashville, Tenn., distant fully 350 miles. They traveled nights and lay concealed days. They were fed by the black men who would not take a cent from them, but were only too glad to help them. It was May 29th when they escaped and June 16 they reached the coast and were taken on board of one of our gun-boats, "The Winona," and taken to Port Royal, S. C, where they were cared for by Admiral Dahlgren and by him sent to Philadelphia, and through the kindness of friends were enabled to reach their homes. We have the history of their escape from Bartie, and Corporal Brizee furnished an account to the historian of the regiment. 327 Among his Whately companions were Andrew M. Weth- erell, brought up by Elbridge G. Crafts. He died at Anderson- ville 20 Aug., 1864, aged twenty-five years; and Patrick Mur- phy, a fine young Irishman, who worked for the writer. When my son, Irving B. Crafts, and Andrew M. Wetherell enlisted Pat said "If the boys are going I'll go too." He died at Ander- sonville 16 March, 1865. Two other of Whately's soldiers died at Andersonville, viz., John Brown, Jr., who was in the 57th Regt., taken prisoner and died 12 Oct., 1864, leaving a widow and two or three children. He was born in Whately in 1820; and Edgar Howard Field, an adopted son of Paul W. Field, who was in the 37th Regt., captured at the battle of the- Wilderness 6 May, 1864, died 15 Aug., 1864. My son, Irving B., was discharged for disability in 1863 and so escaped this imprisonment as he was in the same company the bulk of whom were captured. THE GREAT SWAMP DRAIN. The Great and General Court authorized Governor Hutch- inson to appoint a board of commissioners to take charge of the work of constructing the great drain and apportion the tax on the proprietors of the land benefitted in the so-called Great Swamp in Hatfield and Deerfield. (The drain extended into that part of Deerfield that was annexed to Whately.) The first rate or tax made bore date 21 Aug., 1770. From the size of the tax it is presumed but little had been done before this date. We find the amount assess(;d to one of the proprie- tors, Nathaniel Hawks, 21 Aug., 1770, was ijC 9s sd if; at a subsequent time, to wit, 12 April, 1774, 6;C is gd 2f. This he refused to pay and the collector, John Waite of Whately, levied on nine acres of land west of the road by the Barnard place, being lot No. 8 now held by Noah Dickinson's heirs. _The col- lector made a lease of this lot for nine hundred and ninety-nine years to Capt. Oliver Shattuck, the said Shattuck yielding and paying therefor to the said Hawks "One pepper corn" annually as the rental for the same. It is not known that anything further was done on the drain after 1774 until 1795, this time under authority of the state of Massachusetts. At this time the old drain was cleaned out, enlarged and new lateral ones opened. The commissioners for this last work were Gad Smith, Gideon Dickinson and William Tryon of South Deerfield, the work being finished 12 Sept., 1799. I will copy an account from their books : Martin Graves 328 is d^jeditedfor labor done in Great Swamp Drain, by. clearing out 92)^ rods at 8d, jCs is lod 78 rods at gd, 218 06 44 rods at 3>4d 12 10 £6 13s 2d We have the names of David Graves, Reuben Crafts, Lieut. Zebadiah Graves, Azoniah Cooley, 'Squire Cooley, Eliakim Ames, Capt. Abner Cooley, I/ieut. Elihu McCall, Rev. Rufus Wells, Perez Wells, Samuel Marsh, James Hale, Eber Allis, Elisha Belden, Asa Bardwell, Benjamin Parker, Moses Crafts, Graves and Seth Crafts and 'twelve or fifteen others who all worked and earned from one pound to six or eight pounds. The number of rods dug was 3,810^^, or 11 miles, 290^, rods, making a cost in all of ;^i58 i8s 3d, the average cost per rod being a trifle over ten pence. Probably the owners of the land were allowed to work out their proportion of the tax. There were many branch drains. These facts are gained from the book kept by the commissioners and are deemed perfectly reli- able. I have an extended copy of their account. The section of land still known as Great swamp extends into Hatfield, through Whately into South Deerfield, about four miles north and south, and before it was drained from about fifty rods to near a mile in width. What is now known as the North swamp, above Christian lane, was the widest and furnished much the largest amount of water. This was mostly carried off by what we call I,ittle river. The South Great swamp had its outlet near Egypt road, and it crosses Claverack road, and the hills on each side have always been known as Great swamp hills. The drain enters Mill river, near the Hat- field line, on the Gad Crafts farm. CHAPTER XIX. CENTENNIAL CELEBRATION. A meeting of the citizens of Whately was held May i, 1871, to take some action relative to the celebration of the centennial of our town ; Capt. Seth Bardwell presided, and t,evi Ford was secretary. It was voted unanimously "That we observe the town's centennial anniversary on the Fourth of July next." It was voted to choose a committee of twelve, two from each school district, to solicit funds and make all necessary arrangements for the celebration, and the following persons were chosen as the committee : Southwest district, Capt. Seth Bardwell and Edwin Bardwell ; Northwest district, David Scott and Hiram Bardwell ; North centre district, Elon C. Sanderson and Walter Crafts; South centre district, Francis G. Bardwell and James M. Crafts; Southeast district, EHhu Belden and Charles F. Pease; Northeast district, Edward C. Sanderson and Silas White AUis. At a subsequent time the committee organized, by choosing Capt. Seth Bardwell chairman and Elon C. Sanderson as secre- tary. Voted, "To raise by subscription $500 to pay the neces- sary expenses of the celebration," and the following sub-com- mittees and ofiScers were appointed: Treasurer, Dennis Dickinson; Committee on correspondence, James M. Crafts; Committee on location, Edward C. Sanderson, Walter Crafts Francis G. Bardwell ; Committee on music, Edwin Bardwell, Capt. Seth. Bardwell, Walter Crafts ; 33° President of the day, Elihu Belden, Esq. ; Vice presidents, James M. Crafts, John Chapman Sanderson, Esqs. ; Chiet marshal, Capt. Seth Bardwell ; Assistant marshals, I/ieut. Henry Brown, Francis G. Bardwell; Toast masters, Rev. J. W. Lane, William H. Fuller, Esq. The committee on selection of a suitable place for the hold- ing of the gathering reported that the beautiful maple grove on the farm of Seth B. Crafts could be had, and their report was accepted by the committee. This is on the original Thomas Crafts farm (the writer's great-grandfather), where he settled in 1 75 1. It was, and still is, a beautiful location. Great interest was manifested by our people, and from the first success was assured. The day was beautiful and the crowd of people that surged into the fine, shady grounds was in every way gratifying to all that had labored so constantly to make it a success. Descend- ants of many families were present to add something to the glad- some time. We had the pleasure of meeting and greeting friends from Vermont, New Hampshire, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Ohio, Illinois, Michigan and Canada. The neigh- boring towns furnished many hundreds of interested visitors, all intent upon listening to the many interesting as well as eloquent speeches that were made. A large platform was erected for the speakers and invited guests, and seats were arranged for about three thousand peo- ple. The aged people, who were present in large numbers, had reserved seats directly in front of the speakers. There were some present who had passed their four score and ten years. The large audience was regaled with lemonade and a substan- tial collation, with more than twelve baskets left. Indeed, the whole thing was a success. We would be pleased to present many of the speeches, as well as the beautiful poem written by Rev. Rufus P. Wells, but our limit forbids, so we will only reproduce the opening speech by Elihu Belden, Esq. This was preceded by the singing of America by the entire audience led by the bands, and a prayer by Rev. John W. I^ane. Then Esquire Belden gave the open- ing address of welcome : "ladies and gentlemen: It has fallen upon me as a representative of the descendants of one of the earliest settlers in this town, and in behalf of its 331 citizens, to extend to you to-day our kindly greetings ; and I assure you that I but express the feelings of all our hearts when I bid you a cordial welcome. We welcome you to the old homesteads and all that is left to remind you of bygone years. We welcome you to our firesides and all that is new. We wel- come you to the festivities and associations of this our hundredth birthday. Some feelings of sadness will mingle with our joys on an occasion like this, as we look around and miss familiar faces ; as we recall the past, which returns not, and recount the perils and hardships of our ancestors, when these now pleasant fields and meadows were almost a wilderness. And yet we come as dutiful children, with our votive offerings of affectionate remem- brance. And there is a special fitness, which I need not take pains to set forth at length, that we, their descendants, should gather ourselves together on this centennial anniversary of the incorporation of the town, to testify our admiration of their vir- tues, to review the scenes and deeds of their eventful lives, and unite in commemoration services, which may transmit their names to the generations yet to come who will occupy the places now allotted to us. We can speak with pride and gratitude of those great-grand- fathers and great-grandmothers, those grandfathers and grand- mothers, those fathers and mothers, who toiled and struggled for us; who dared the onsets of savage warfare, endured the privations of frontier life and made any required sacrifices in order to secure for us the inheritance we now enjoy. We welcome with feelings of peculiar interest those who were once our citizens or children of our citizens, who have come from the more distant parts of our land and from the Queen's dominions, to keep jubilee with us to-day. We extend to you the right hand of fellowship ; we receive you with a happy greeting, and rejoice that your prosperity in your new homes has not extinguished your interest in your old native town. We welcome the citizens of Hatfield, and are especially glad that our mother town has not forgotten us, and we hope to prove to you that we are proud of the relationship. We welcome the citizens of Williamsburg, our sister town,. "Twinned at a birth." We welcome all who share with us common memories and kindred blood. 332 May God grant that the impressions received here to-day from our rehearsals of the past, our common ofiferings upon the old home altars and our rekindled hopes may but strengthen the cords that bind us together and make us better friends, neighbors and citizens. But it is not well for me (even if I could) to occupy more of your time. We have those present who are capable of holding your silent attention at their will, and whose words of wisdom you are waiting to hear." «> CHAPTER XX. SECRBT ORDERS. There has been for many years a few of our citizens con- nected with orders of Free Masons and likewise of the Odd Fel- lows, and I deem it of sufficient importance to give, so far as I can, the names of such members as I can recall as belonging to either of these orders. First, we will give those of the Free and Accepted Masons, and as far as I can, will give the year they were initiated : Peter Clark, 1796, Asa Frary, ist, 1797, Elijah Allis, 1797, Selah Munson, 1801, David Stockbridge, 1800, Zebina Bartlett, Capt. Salmon Graves, Deacon James Smith, Rev. John R. Goodnough, Chester Brown, Jonathan Smith, 18 18, Austin Allis, Dr. Richard Emmons, Elijah Sanderson, David Sanderson, Dr. Francis Harwood, Hubbard S. Allis, 1846, Martin Crafts. 1843, Justin R. Smith, 1866, James M. Crafts, 1869, Thomas S. Dickinson, Myron Brown, Nov., 1870, William H. Fuller, W. I. Fox, Albert S. Fox, Miles B. Morton, I^uther W. Clark, C. H. Stockbridge, Edwin T. Smith, Joseph L. Smith, John C. Faulkner, Dr. J. D. Seymour, Rev. E. B. Fairchild, William B. Orcutt, W. W. Sanderson, Freeman A. Crafts, Charles E. Crafts, George E. Sanderson, 334 Dwight L. Dickinson, 1 866, Victor D. Bardwell. ^ L. Iv. Eaton, i868. During the excitement growing out of the alleged abduc- tion of William Morgan, Jerusalem lodge at Northampton, though it did not surrender its charter, yet in accord with the demands of the Anti-masonic party, suspended its meetings at Northampton, yet the members continued to hold meetings, in connection with their brethren from Greenfield and adjoining towns, at Whatelyat the hotel of David Stockbridge in his hall, where the insignia painted on the walls is still visible. This w&,s soon noised abroad, and then they had a commodious room fitted up in the two-story house of Capt. Salmon Graves, on the site of the present house of C. A. Graves. I have seen both of these places of meeting, and there is also similar insignia on these walls. After the excitement had in a great measure abated the various lodges were reopened and, for a wonder, are very popular, and the Connecticut river still flows on as peacefully as of yore. In consequence of the violent and unreasonable opposition raised to Masonry Rev. John R. Goodnough, pastor of the Bap- tist church in Whately, was compelled to renounce Masonry or leave the fellowship of the churches, and he decided to retain his connection with the Masons and his personal independence. The Independent Order of Odd Fellows organized lodges at Greenfield and Northampton. Nonotuck, No. 6i, was insti- tuted in Northampton, ii March ,1845; Pocomptuck, No. 67, perhaps two years later; Alethian, No. 128, 13 Sept., 1848, at Shelburne Falls. These lodges became at once popular and quite a number of our citizens joined them, mostly Nonotuck, No. 61. I will give a list of the names, as fully as I can, of Whately citizens: Col. R. B. Harwood, ) Samuel Lesure, I Josiah Allis, Samuel B. White, E. H. Woods, J. R. Smith, James M. Crafts, Edwin Bardwell, Paul W. Field, Salma W. Field, Charles H. Field, All f before I 1847. George W. Moore, Rufus M. Swift, Samuel C. Wood, George E. Wood, Micajah Howes, Ryland C. Howes, Charles A. Coville, Leander F. Cfafts, Charles R. Crafts, Edmund B. Crafts, Henry S. Higgins, 335 Charles E. Bardwell, John C. Field, Hiram Bardwell, Nelson H. Damon, Edgar M. Bardwell, Selah Smith Graves, Lyman A. Munson, Hubbard S. Allis, 1841. Henry J. Hoar, REMINISCENCES. Sometimes the memory of old times will impress me with some curious scenes that used to occur in the old meeting-house at Whately, and I seem to see clearly the old-time faces that were then so familiar to me. As I think over these incidents I seem to live over again the scenes that then impressed them- selves upon my mind. Seventy^four years ago I was a boy of eight years of age and my parents, having great confidence in me that I should behave myself properly, allowed me to occupy a seat in their pew in the gallery, but didn't want me to sit be- hind the singers, as it was called, where a good many mischiev- ous young men and boys congregated. Then people, old and young, went to meeting forenoon and afternoon and often at five o'clock ixnlessthe day was extremely unpleasant. In warm weather the boys went barefoot and the men, if they took a coat, carried it on their arm often not put- ting it on during the day. Wagons were not as plentiful as now £^nd many walked two or three miles, carrying their shoes and"Jtockings in their hands until they were near the meeting- house, and when going home they would take them off again and walk home barefoot. But what we have to relate has to do with some of the scenes enacted in the church. The singers' seats comprised a double row of seats on three sides of the gallery. The singers occupied the east side of the gallery facing the pulpit, while the other seats on the south side were filled with young men and boys, and the north side by young ladies and girls. It is need- less to say that various flirtations were in progress between the boys and girls, to say nothing of laughing and giggling, snap- ping apple seeds and throwing apple cores and other missiles. If they failed to reach across the 30-foot space they would fall upon the older people on the ground floor. To keep order among the young bloods of both sexes one or more tything men were among the singers. The particular one of which I shall speak was Deacon James Smith, a really pleasant man, but he fully understood his business. He was a large man of 336 over two hundred pounds avoirdupois, with long, bushy eye- brows and sharp eyes that would fairly flash when with his great hand he would rap on the counter with a force that was easily heard all over, the house, and with a scowl on his face, he would point at the disturbers who would most generally sub- side. If not, he would march in among them and by his pres- ence overawe the mischief makers. I well recollect one Sun- day, the latter part of September, some seven or eight tough, roistering young fellows occupied the pew adjoining the one where I sat. To reach our pew one step up was needed and the next one two steps up, fully eighteen inches. These boys had been down into Parsons Wells' orchard and filled their pockets with apples and when the services commenced they be- gan to munch the apples and- "whiz" would go a core across to the girls on the north side of the gallery. They had taken off the door to the pew and had laid a board across in front from the sides of the seats. This they had weakened so that it wouldn't bear the weight of an ordinary-sized man for a purpose. They laughed, whispered and threw the apple cores, all the more lively as the deacon's rapping became louder. At last the deacon arose and came with thunderous tread and mounted into the pew, and every eye was on him to see what would happen. He had straddled over the board and plunked himself down ; the board broke and he fell backward into the aisle, striking on his head and shoulders, making things jar. His fall caused much laughter, but not dismayed he regained his feet and marched into that pew, the boys making a seat for him, even without his demanding it. Everybody laughed, and even the good old dominie could with difficulty restrain an out- burst at the grotesque figure cut by the pious old deacon, but you may safely bet your last sixpence that you never saw a pen of lambs that were any more quiet than were these fun-loving chaps. Tything men were endowed with constabulary powers, and at an earlier day used to be armed with a pole four or five feet long, with some feathers tied on one end, and when one of the tired old ladies fell asleep and was making too much noise in her open-mouthed respirations, the tything man would use the feather end to tickle her face and thus awaken her, and the other end was used to arouse some old man if he snored too loud. Jeremiah Waite, an uncle of mine, was chosen to the high position of a tything man of Whately. He had I^evi Graves 337 arrested for using these wicked and profane words following, that is to say: "God damn you, to the great displeasure of Almighty God, against good morals and good manners, against the peace of the said Commonwealth, contrary to the form of the statute in such cases made and provided," dated at Whately 13 April, 1826. Two days later he was arrested and arraigned for the crime. The trial was held and the aforesaid Levi Graves was acquitted. A few years before this, while good old Nathaniel Coleman and his excellent wife were seated on the back of his faithful, old black mare, going to meeting, it seems that Jacob Mosher, the cooper, was drawing sortie water and the pole turning on the pin made a loud, screeching noise. This so shocked their pious sensibilities that he went to see Benjamin Cooley, the tything man, and ordered him to notify Mr. Mosher that if he didn't grease his well sweep and stop that unearthly noise he would have him arrested. Suffice it to say that a ladder was procured and the offending well sweep was duly annointed. CEMETERIES. These cemeteries were early located in Whately. That in the center of the town is on the west side of Chestnut Plain street at or near the top of Gutter hill. Most of the land is measurably free from stone and is of a light gravelly soil, while the north part is underlaid with stiff clay which is retentive of moisture. This is more particularly true of the northeast corner which has now been underdrained with tile and is largely available for the purposes of burial. This has been en- larged by the addition of land purchased from the farm of Ches- ter K. Waite and son at two different times. These additions have been made by private enterprise by parties who desired a lot for family use. The town has made liberal appropriations for the fencing and care of cemeteries, and chooses a set of commissioners to keep the grounds in order. This dates back somewhere near 1880, as near as I can estimate it. Quite a number of our citi- zens in this way get excellent lots. About 1875 Rev. John W. Lane commenced agitating the subject of arranging the ground by setting over very many of the headstones so as to conform to plans of the ground furnishing suitable walks between the head- stones, thus giving easy access to every part of the older portion of the grounds where it seemed as though everyone only cared 338 for one's own self. Great credit is due to Mr. Lane for his ad- mirable work in this cemetery. It had the effect to induce the town to do what they have since done under the leadership of Leander F. Craftj, who is the sexton as well as the chairman of the board of commissioners. Mr. Crafts fully understands the subject of improving the grounds- Since the work done by Mr. Lane, very many cc-itly monuments have been placed in the cemetery. The Eastern cemetery is located on the south side of the road leading from the Straits to the River road, just at the top of Hopewell hill, and east from Bartlett's corners. For some years Mr. David Ashcraft has had the control of this cemetery, and under his able supervision the grounds have always had a cleanly, tidy look, showing that they have been well cared for. The soil is easily handled, wholly free from .stone, dry and well adapted to the purpose for which it is used, and the small sum appropriated by the town serves, with the assistance of the good people, to keep it in a creditable condition. Probably the first one buried here was Joseph Sanderson whose headstone is dated 20 March, 1772. The Western cemetery is on the east side of Poplar Hill road south of the Isaiah Brown farm. This too is a well kept ground. It is largely free from stone arid boulders, easy of dig- ging and dry. It shows intelligent care of its grounds, and is in evidence that the money furnished by the town for its care is used to good advantage. The oldest headstone is that of Cla- rissa Bardwell, a daughter of Lieut. Noah Bardwell, who died 15 Dec, 1776. It has been claimed that Miss Charity Brown, who died 24 Nov., 1800, aged forty years, was the first adult person buried there. This can't be true, as Mrs. Ezra Turner died 7 Jan., 1777, aged thirty-five years, Peter Train 21 Jan., 1793, and fully seven or eight others before Miss Brown. The oldest grave in the Central cemetery is that of Esther (Bardwell), wife of Daniel Morton, who died 27 Oct., 1762, while the oldest headstone is that of Jemima, wife of Captain Lucius Allis, who died 9 June, 1864. "We can but commend the liberality of the town not only for the present care of the grounds of all the cemeteries, but for providing a good, substantial tomb for the use of the whole town during the severities cS our winters, and affording a suitable hearse and biers for the accommodation of our people in giving suitable service for the burial of our dead. 339 The first hearse was given to the town in 1824 by the heirs of Deacon Thomas Sanderson. This Deacon Sanderson had ordered, but he died before its completion. I,ONGEVITY. In looking over the list of marriages where the couple had lived together over fifty years we find the following : Allis, Elijah and Electa, 59 years ; AUis, Deacon Russell and Sarah, 57 Bacon, Benjamin and Rebecca, 61 Bardwell, I,ieut. Noah and Lucy, 60 Bard well, Spencer and Sophia, 60 Bardwell, Ebenezer and Sarah Tute, 58 Bartlett, 'Zebina and Demis, 59 Belden, Joseph and Margaret, 58 Brown, Edward and Hannah, 62 Brown, George and Almira, 63 Chauncey, Richard and Elizabeth, 61 Crafts, Thomas and Sarah, 61 Crafts, Thomas and Mehitable, 57 Dickinson, Eurotus and Sarah, 68 Dickinson, Jehu and Eleanor, 54 Dickinson, Abner and Sarah, 62 Frary, Isaac and Sarah, 59 Graves, David Sr. and Abigail, 61 Graves, David Jr. and Mary, 50 Graves, Matthew and Hannah, 53 Graves, Deacon Oliver and Rebecca, 56 Graves, Oliver Jr. and Abigail, 58 Graves, Spencer and Lura, 54 Graves, Edward and Elizabeth, 56 Graves, Lyman and Electa, 58 Lesure, Samuel and Lucy, 55 Loomis, J. C. and Electa, 54 Mather, Capt. Benjamin and Abigail, 54 Morton, Justin and Esther, 67 Morton, Consider and Mercy, 64 Morton, Randall and Crissa A., 59 Morton, Joel aiid Violet, 53 Munson, Reuben and Sibyl, 60 Robinson, Hiram and Sophia, 53 34° Scott, Phineas and Rhoda, 67 years ; Smith, Elisha and Sarah, 57 Smith, Bezaliel and I