EX tfi| Lmm ^^.-t" 086191 .%,- •^^■'' ^*^*^'- ^ixT^.. -a-:^ mM' i CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY FROM Cornell University Library TD 430.H84 Water and sewage purification. 3 1924 005 001 478 Cornell University Library The original of tiiis bool< is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924005001478 WATER AND SEWAGE PURIFICATION. By Sir Alexander C. Houston, K.B.E., C.V.O., M.B., D.Sc, Director of Water Examinations, Metropolitan Water Board, London. It is impossible to say for a given year how much it has borrowed from the wisdom and experience of previous years, or to try to measure its influence on the years that are to come. Even present-day tangible discoveries may show, tcj.^the far-seeing eye, some of the honourable rust of antiquity, and indeed the extent to which we borrow on the past ill thought and deed is incapable of measurement. Thus it happens that in trpng to sum up the knowledge gained in a particular year we are always trespassing on the past and, conversely, we may be doing the year in question too little credit in relation to its bearing on future progress. Nevertheless, it is desirable to attempt periodically to take stock of current knowledge, to endeavour to show the general trend of events, and to indicate some of the directions in which future progress is likely to, or should, take, place. The year 1919 has beetFa>,culminating one in the struggle of expediency over sentimentality, and in new ways of looking at things. Some of the events, which during recent years have brought us to-day to this new jumping-ofE ground for more rapid progress, may be briefly described. Water. At the very outset of the war, the pioneer work on chlorine sterilisa- tion at Lincoln ^ in 1905 bore full fruit. Giving full credit to all other preventive agencies at work, it may still be said that the health (thanks to Horrocks and his colleagues) of our Armies in the Field all over the world was considerably, if not largely, influenced by efficient chlorine sterilisation processes. In 1915 a notable event occurred — Aberdeen^ received the assent 1 Fifth Report of the Royal Commission on Sewage Disposal, Appendix IV. pp. 99-166 ; also pp. 84-98 ; also 171. Dr. Reeoe's Report to the Local Govern- ment Board on Lincoln epidemic (No. 226), 1906. 2 Private Legislation Procedure (Scotland) Act, 1899. Aberdeen Corporation Water Provisional Order, Proceedings at Inquiry, October 21-27, 1915 (The Univer- sity Press, Aberdeen). 2 HEPORTS OP THE PBOGEESS OP APPLIED CHEMISTRY, of Parliament to a scheme for purifying the River Dee for waterworks purposes by (1) excess-liming, (2) short storage, and (3) rapid filtration, the saving in capital cost on alternative schemes exceeding £100,000. The way towards this event was paved by the discovery that caustic lime present in water, in even the smallest excess, exercised a strong bactericidal action.* In 1916 the Metropolitan Water Board* decided to save coal by chlorinating raw Thames River water (70-80 million gallons a day) and allowing the treated water to flow by gravity down the Staines Aque- duct, instead of first pumping it up into Staines Reservoirs. The diSerence between the cost of pumping and the cost of chlorinating is about £1000 a month. The treatment is in successful operation to-day. The New River supply* of the Metropolitan Water Board is made up of a variable mixture of New River water (Upper Lea water) and pure well water. During the greater part of the year, owing to the good quality of the well water and the relatively satisfactory state of the river water, the filtered water results are remarkably good, as judged by the ordinary chemical and bacteriological standards, despite the fact that the rate of filtration at the New River works is considerably in excess of that practised at the other works of the Board. During winter fioods, the river water deteriorates so much that the excellent quality of the well water fails to " mask " the deterioration of the mixed filtered water product. The storage reservoirs at Hornsey and Stoke Newing- ton are far too small to afiect the position materially. In 1916 the Metropolitan Water Board started investigations with the object of seeing whether it might not be possible to remedy this state of afEairs by chlorination. It is obvious that to increase materially the filtra- tion area, or to provide adequate storage accommodation, would mean an immense capital outlay in order to improve matters during these transitory periods of deterioration. The experiments have been most satisfactory in a bacteriological sense, but the unfortunate fact remains that when the treatment was carried out uninterruptedly for longer than about a fortnight, the water acquired a decidedly objectionable taste. This was partly due to the filters gradually and progressively adsorbing taste-imparting materials, which eventually escaped into the filtered water, so that even when the treatment was perforce stopped the taste remained for some time in ' Metropolitan Water Board, Director of Water Exfimination's Eighth Besearch Report (see also Ninth and Tenth Research Reports). * Metropolitan Water Board, Director of Water Examination's Twelfth Besearch Beport (see also Eleventh, Twelfth, and Thirteenth Annual Reports). ' Metropolitan Water Board, Director of Water Examination's Eleventh, Twelfth, and Thirteenth Annual Beports. V7ATER AND SEWAGE PtTfttFtCAtlON. 3 the water as supplied to consumers. It should pertaps be explained that for technical reasons it was impossible to chlorinate the water subsequent to filtration. Although a filtered water may require less chlorine for sterilisation purposes than an unfiltered one, the writer's experience has been that with some waters, at aU events, there is a greater liability to taste troubles if the chlorine is applied subsequent to the filtration process. In 1918 a system of super-chlorination and de-chlorination was adopted, it having been found in the laboratory that even a grossly-super-chlorinated water had no taste after de- chlorination. In practice, however, the results were only moderately successful with regard to absence of taste, although yielding excellent results bacteriologicaUy, nevertheless it did seem as if the kind of taste was considerably modified in character by this method of treatment. The matter is being further investigated, and it is hoped that some satisfactory solution of the difficulty may yet be found. The writer has recently discovered that potassium permanganate in doses of 2-8 lb. per million gallons is most effective in preventing or removing the taste' of chlorinated waters whether added before, simultaneously with, or after the chlorine. It appears, however, to be ineffective if the permanganate is added before, and the chlorine after filtration, although the converse plan yields successful results, as does also their joint use either before or after filtration. Sodium manganate may be used successfully instead of permanganate of potassium. The matter has gone beyond mere laboratory experiments. For example, 33 milhon gallons per day flowing down an open channel were treated with chlorine (1 in 1 mUlion). The .water a little way below the point of treatment (about J hour's flow) had, after de-chlorination, a decided " chemist's shop flavour " or " iodoform " taste. Next potassium permanganate (8 lb. per million gallons) was added immediately below the point at which the chlorine entered the water. After a suitable interval it was again, after de-chlorination, tested at the same spot as before, and it no longer gave any taste. The experiment was repeated twice more with exactly the same satisfactory results. By this " see-saw " experiment it was proved conclusively that permanganate under practical out-door conditions can prevent or remove the objec- tionable taste of, at all events, some chlorinated waters. With a longer contact the dose of permanganate may so-metimes be reduced four times. The point that the writer desires to emphasise is that the New Eiver experiments constituted an attempt to tide over economically periods of crisis, and it is difficult to say how far such efiorts may eventually lead us. For example, speaking more particularly of river-derived water supplies, there are normally two periods of the year when the filtered water results are apt to be relatively unsatisfactory. In summer, during very hot weather, the consumption of water may be so materially 4 REPORTS OF THE PBOGBBSS OF APPLIED CHEMISTRY. increased as to lead to considerably increased rates of filtration, and in the winter the water about to be filtered may be much less pure than the normal, and, in addition, there are a variety of circumstances which increase the difficulties — for example, the rate of filtration may have to be increased during exceptionally cold weather, owing to increased consumption of -water consequent upon burst pipes and taps left running overnight. Further, frosty weather may lead to mechani- cal interference with the filtration process, and a seasonal deficiency in the water of those growths which form a skin on the surface of the sand in the filter may also be a factor in influencing the results. It is at times such as these that sterilisation processes seem specially attractive, for the interest on the capital cost and the working costs are inconsiderable, or, at all events, immeasurably small, in comparison with the alternative of an increase of filtration area not really needed except in periods of stress. Developments in the foregoing direction seem likely to attract considerable notice in the near future. There is also the point that consequent upon the war all engineering projects have been greatly delayed and that a considerable time must elapse before new works can be completed. Meanwhile, the consumption of water may be progressively increasing, leading to increased rates of filtration and to a worse water being supplied to consumers. Here again chlorination as a temporary measure may be found extremely useful. In 1917 Rotherham decided on the policy of re-using the abandoned and severely censured Ulley gatheri]jg ground, and, subject to the approval of the Local Government Board, to supply water from this source, after being rendered safe by sterilisation processes, to the inhabitants of that town. Somewhat later, Cardiff ® determined to adopt a similar course in regard to a portion of their gathering ground, which had been pro- visionally given up as not wholly satisfactory for waterworks purposes. The saving involved if these two decisions could be successfully carried out was of a very material kind. In 1917 Accra was faced with a very unsatisfactory position as regards its water supply. The water (swamp water, liable to pollution) deterio- rated to a remarkable extent in the relatively large storage reservoirs, absolutely necessary for purposes of quantity. Exhaustive experi- ments were made, and it was found that by applying the " excess lime " method of treatment the water was freed from excremental bacteria [e.g., B. coli) and remained clear, odourless, and free from ° C. H. Priestley, " Temporary Sources of Supply in Times of Emergeucy," Water, July, 1919, p. 175. WATER AND SEWAGE PURIFICATION. 5 growths under conditions of storage. The saving on alternative puri- fication works represented a large sum of money. This is the first occasion on which the excess-lime method has been used for the express double purpose of destroying " plankton " development and rendering water safe from the epidefniological point of view. In the present year Sheffield ' conceived a scheme for the utilisation of river water as compensation water, which, despite its bold and unprecedented character, received, with certain reservations, the assent of Parliament. It is of interest to consider this unique proposal at some length, because its influence on future procedures may be far- reaching. Sheffield was obliged by Act of Parliament to pass about 10 million gallons daily of pure moorland water from the Dam-Flask and Rivelin reservoirs down the course of the grossly polluted river Don (which, of course, was not used for drinking purposes) as compen- sation water. The proposal was to reserve this pure water to increase the domestic supply to Sheffield and to abstract from the Don below the point where the sewage effluent from the city, together with many other impurities, entered the river an approximately similar amount of water, to purify and soften it, and to pump the purified river water back about eleven miles up-stream and pass it through the statutory mill gauge in lieu of the unnecessarily pure water discharged from the reservoirs for compensation purposes. The word " unnecessarily " in this connection is used advisedly, for the river Don water was only used for trade purposes and was so heavily polluted with ochre streams, trade effluents, and waste liquors near and below the point of discharge of the compensation water that to " feed " it with water of a high degree of purity was a wasteful procedure. Sheffield considered that if they purified and softened the river water abstracted below Sheffield to a standard at least equal to that proposed by the Royal Commission on Sewage Disposal, and softened it as well, they were in no way injuring trade interests, destroying the amenities of the district, or endangering health. Indeed, by utilising a pure moorland water for augmenting the domestic supply of Sheffield, they were greatly contributing to the prosperity and welfare of that import- ant city, and conserving the water and financial resources of the country, inasmuch as any alternative project for providing an equal quantity of potable water would have involved the ratepayers in a capital outlay of approximately 3 million pounds, compared with £350,CC0. The proposed method of purification was by lime and soda treat- ment, followed by efficient filtration. In proof of ability to purify the water efficiently an experimental plant was erected and elaborate tests made. The following table shows some of the results obtained : ' Sheffield Corporation's Bill (1919), Part II.— Waterworks. b KEPORTS OF THE PROGRESS OF APPLIED CHEMISTRY. Analyses of Uiver Analyses of river Don water taken at water after proposed intake. treatment. Parts per 100,000. Parts per 100,000. Solids in suspension ... Nil to lO'OO Nil Hardness 10-35 to 30-50 3-71 to 8-71 Oxygen absorbed in 4 tours . 0-32 to 2-38 0-19 to 0-80 Acidity Nil — Total alkalinity — 5-00 to 8-25 Chlorine 2-00 to 21-60 2-00 to 21-00 It may be said that Parliament endorsed the wise proposals of Sheffield on all points of principle, but imposed certain reservations and modifications, as a measure of precaution, in view, no doubt, of the unique and unprecedented nature of the project. Briefly these were as follows : 1. The maximum quantity of water which may be abstracted from the Eiver Don and pumped back for use as compensation water is roundly 5 million gallons per day. 2. The treated water is to be discharged with at least an equal quantity of reservoir water subject to an addition of 10% in the quan- tity of treated water. 3. The standard of purity and the terms and conditions prescribed by the Act may be varied by the Ministry of Health on the representa- tion of the Corporation, the West Riding Rivers Board, the Associated Millowners, or any other body or person having a substantial interest in the matter, after the expiration of four years from the date when the treated water is first used for Compensation purposes. 4. Prescribed standard : Solids in suspension, 2 parts per 1G0,C00 ; hardness CaCOj (soap .solution), 8 parts ; oxygen absorbed from N/80 potassium permanganate, in 4 hours, at 80° F., 1 part per lOO.CGO, or on the average of 3 consecutive days not more than G-75 part. The Report of the Select Committee on Local Legislation which con- sidered the Sheffield Bill stated : " The Sheffield Corporation Bill contained entirely novel proposals with regard to water supply. The Corporation were allowed, after full evidence being given, to substitute for compensation water, which they are now under statutory obligation to discharge into certain rivers, an effiuent from their sewage works purified to a standard required by the Bill, and which standard is based to a considerable extent on the findings of a Royal Commission of some years ago. The urgent need for, and difficulty in obtaining, a further supply of water for domestic purposes, combined with the special circumstances affecting Sheffield, make this case suitable for testing an experiment, which, if as successful as the evidence suggested, would be of incalculable advantage in other cases, where suitable conditions exist for its application." In the preparation of these notes the writer is greatly indebted to the courtesy of Mr. Terry. WATER AND SEWAGE PURIFICATION. Within the last few years a great deal of attention has been directed to the suspended matters ^ (particularly the " plankton "^) in river and reservoir waters, owing to their efiect in choking sand filters and some- times in giving the water an ofiensive taste. At the Metropolitan Water Board's Laboratories it is the practice to examine bi-weekly all the samples of pre-filtration water (20-25 in number), river water, all the stored waters, gravel water, etc. The methods adopted are as follows : The " resistance to filtration " (by this is meant the degree to which the suspended matters^ — -living and dead — ^in a water interfere with its filtration) is tested in the following manner : A piece of linen of superfine quality (96 meshes to the Unear inch) is folded four times, moistened with water and tied round the end of a glass tube (J in. diameter) by means of a rubber band. It might be conjectured that a layer of sand would be more suitable than linen. The writer has tried it, and it gives a most disappointing range of results, unlike linen, when the results vary from 0"0 to over 300 according to the amount of suspended matter in the water. The tube is passed through a rubber bung which is fitted into a filtering flask, connected with a filter pump. The other projecting end of the glass tube has a piece of rubber tubing attached to it, and into this is inserted the end of a pipette containing 100 c.c. of the sample of water to be examined. The water passes through the linen into the flask, and practically all the suspended matter is retained on the inside of the hnen. The rubber bung and glass tube are then detached and fitted on to the additional piece of apparatus. This is merely a convenient arrangement for supplying tap water under a constant head (about 5 ft.). The water is filtered through the linen, with its skin of suspended matter derived from 100 c.c. of the original water, for the space of one minute, and the filtrate is then measured. A water having little or no suspended matter will, in these circumstances, give a filtrate of, say, 2C0-3C0 c.c.*'' A water badly affected with algal growths may yield no measurable filtrate, and between these two extremes all kinds of results are obtained (see charts pp. 472-3). As regards the microscopical appearances of the suspended matters, the following photographic method of examination is used in order to obtain qualitative and quantitative pictures of the condition of the * On pp. 35 and 37 of " Studies in Water Supply " (Messrs. John Bale; Sons & Danielsson, Ltd.) diagrams will be found fuUy illustrating the methods employed. See also Metropolitan Water Board, Director of Water Examination's Twelfth Research Report, and Ninth, Tenth, Eleventh, Twelfth, and Thirteenth Annua Reports. ' Photomicrographio illustrations of the various growths in water will be found in "Studies in Water Supply" (Messrs. Macmillan & Co.), "Rivers as Sources of Water Supply " and " Rural Water Supplies and Their Purification " (Messrs. John Bale, Sons & Danielsson, Ltd.), and also in the Director of Water Examina- tion's Reports to the Melropolitan Water Board. EEPORTS or THE PEOGEESS OF APPLIED CHEMISTKY. Eesistance to Filtration 'Experiments. Number of c.o. filtered per minute. c.c. JAN. FEB. MAR. APR. MAY. JUNE. JULY. AUG. SEP OCT NOV. DEC. c.c. ZOO 280 Z6Q„ 140 Z20 ZOO ■1'80 19 > .-<•' I /\ 6-1 ■■S....A4-W X >r 1 Nr I9i6-ia \ / r *,,' \ / 19 O \ ^ / 1 r \ / 500 280 '=-.,?60 Z40 ZZO ZOO 180 S. AND V. Walton Stoeed Water. JAN. FEB. MAR. APR. MAY JUNE. JULY AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC. West Middlesex No. 1. Resebvoie Stoeed Water. c.c. 300 280 260 ZW ZZO ZOO 180 J60 JfO AV. 120 WO 80 60 40 20 WATER AND SEWAGE PDKLFIOATION. 9 JAN. FEB. MA R. APR. MAY JUNE. JULY AUG. SEP OCT. NOV. DEC. c.c 500 280 260 2W 220 200 180 160 AV. 120 . 4 - ■ l^ 1 1 1 \ ,^'" 1 1 t 1 1 / \n y 1 1 f / \ .' J r t t t \ i y 1 1 1 « \ \w6 la t * t t 1 t t i/ If If ( \ 1^ Y , f /s/e- 18 1 % 1/ if ' \ ' \}. W».| i/ I \ k / 1 11919 N 1919 100 80 60 20 Raw Thames Water. various waters : 20 c.c. of the water are placed in a glass tube and centrifuged, the result being that aU matters in suspension are driven to the bottom of the tube. The contents are then carefully poured ofE to a little above the 0-2 c.c. top mark on the narrower portion of the tube. The pipette is then used to suck out the water to exactly the level of the 0-2 c.c. top mark, care being taken not to disturb the sediment. This water is expelled from the pipette, which latter is then used to mix thoroughly the deposit with the water remaining in the tube. Between the two marks is exactly O-l c.c, and this amount, or one- half of the whole of the suspended matter in 20 c.c. of water, is trans- ferred with the pipette to the small cell. A trace of formalin is added to prevent the movement of any motile organisms that may be pre- sent, and now we have 0-1 c.c. or the suspended matter pertaining to 10 O.C. of water, lying in the cell ready to be photographed.^' ' The slide is next centred, so that the middle of the cell hes exactly below the centre of the lens. A magnification of 50 diameters is employed, '• " See footnotes on page 471. 10 REPORTS OP THE PROGRESS OF APPLIED CHEMISTRY. as this, in most cases, is quite large enough for diagnostic purposes, and it gives a reasonably flat and a relatively large field. Of course, the whole of the 0-1 c.c. is not photographed, but it has been found experimentally that about one-twentieth part appears in the picture, which corresponds to the suspended matter in J c.c. of the original water (see plate illustrating some of the growths found in water) . The river water usually filters badly in winter, due to the mud, silt, and dirt brought down by the floods, relatively badly in spring and early summer, due to growths {e.g., synedra, -pkurosigma diatoma, navicuta, tabellaria, etc.), but for the remainder of the year the results are usually satisfactory. The stored reservoir water varies enormously, some reservoirs yield- ing excellent water all the year round, whilst in other cases the results deteriorate, due to an over-development of growths in the late winter siJid early spring, and again perhaps in the summer and early autumn months. The growths in the reservoir water are usually difierent from those commonly present in the river water, are much more abundant and of more varied character {e.g., jragilaria, asterionella, tabellaria, faidorina, cyclotclla, itejihanodiscus, ceratium, glenodinium, synura, 'staurastrum, pediastrum, scenedesmus, eudorina, voloox, oscillaria, etc.). In the absence of any over-development of these growths, stored water filters much better than river water. The further study of the con- ditions which foster the development of these growths is highly import- ant, as they sometimes give water a most objectionable taste and smell, and, apart from this, their choking efiect on filters is often a serious matter. The choking effect may actually lead to a shortage of available water and interfere so markedly with the normal working of the filters that an impure water may be supplied to con- sumers. As regards remedial measures, copper sulphate, in doses of 1 in 1 to 1 in 5 millions, has been found to be most effective, especially if applied at an early stage of " plankton " development ; and potassium per- manganate (dose 5 lb. per million gallons) has a remarkable influence in removing the objectionable taste produced by excessive development of undesirable growths in water. Despite the extension of rapid filtration plants, the advocates of the slow sand filters remain, rightly or wrongly, absolutely unshaken in their belief in the advantages of this well-tried method of purification. The question, however, which is at present receiving considerable attention is this : Is it permissible with, possibly even without, the use of aluminium sulphate as a coagulant to filter at an exceedingly rapid rate, to condone any falling-ofi in the chemical results, and to secure the safety of the consumer by a post-fiJtration clilorination pro- I 1 1*^ io 1. fedMW^rMm x 400. 2. Pleurosigma X 50. 3. Olenodinium X 150. 4. .4s>-f%^^ .lAv. '-.^ -^iJf- K'^^Hpi^^^E ^BKiflSK^0kJFwniir^ L ' m .^-^^ fe^ i, ■■• *. .. t¥^-':-.V4-. ^>-;^* _-:^-«i^^^ V