All. LcIG ■' QJornrll IGaui ^r^onl library Cornell University Library RA 1051.D28 1873 Principles of medical jurisprudence:desi 3 1924 016 935 177 Cornell University Library The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924016935177 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. PRINCIPLES MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE: DESIGNED FOR THE PROFESSIONS OF LAW AND MEDICINE. By AMOSJJEAN, JOUNSELLOR AT LAW, AND PROFESSOR OF MEDICAL JURISPRtJDENCB IN THE ALBANY MEDICAL COLLEGE. NEW YORK: BANKS & BROTHEES, LAW PUBLISHERS, No. 144 NASSAU STREET. ALBANY: 475 BROADWAY. 1873. ■ Entered accord :.g to Act of Congress, m the year 1850, by GOULD, BANKS & GOULD, In the Clerk's Office of tLe Dismct Court of the Northern District of New-YorV. HON. JABEZ D. HAMMOND, LL. D., WHOSE TALENTS, VIRTUES AND MORAL WORTH ENDEAR HIM TO THE PRESENT AND COMMEND HIS NAME AND EXAMPLE TO THE FUTURI ©I)t0 Book is Inscribed, AS A TESTIMONY OF REGARD AND ESTEEM AND A TOKEN OF GRATEFUL REMEMBRANCE 33g ttje 2totljor. PREFACE. The topics embraced in the Science of Medical Jurisprudence have been constantly acquiring importance jn proportion as the wants of society have in creased, its resources multiplied, and the refinements of civilization become ex- tended and enlarged. Although its principles have ever lain at the foundation of general jurisprudence, yet their clear ascertainment, and embodiment in a scientific form, have been comparatively recent. Within the last half century, great and important advancements have been made in a knowledge ofthem, and their application to the practical affairs of life. The wants and requisitions of society, in regard to this knowledge, have been furnishing a constant stimulus to the human mind, and inciting it to continued effort in discovering new principles, as well as defining, elucidating, and applying, those that were old. The demand of the public, in this respect, is sufficiently evidenced in the mul- tiplication of the means of instruction, that is every where taking place. No medical institution in this country or Europe, could now deem its organization complete, without a department devoted exclusively to an exposition of the facts and principles embraced in Medical Jurisprudence. An experience of some eleven years in teaching in this department, together with a knowledge of the wants of the legal and medical professions in regard to it, have led to the compilation of the work now offered to the public. If does not propose to add new heads, or general topics, for discussion ; to deal in origi- nal disquisitions, upon doubtful or unsettled principles , or to offer mere novel ties to those in pursuit of knowledge on its various subjects. The objects chiefly had in view, have been, a methodical, systematic arrangement of the topics legitimately embraced in the department ; and in the treatment of each, a con- densation of the knowledge now possessed ; and an exhibition of it in a clear, natural, and logical order, together with such illustrations as were deemed necessary to make an application of the principles to practice. In the selection, and narration of cases, both multiplication, and minuteness of detail, have been equally avoided ; the object being simply to illustrate, and facilitate the reduc- tion to practice, of the principles embraced in them. By adopting this course, I am enabled, within the compass of a single volume, to state in concise terms, all, or nearly all, the ascertained facts and well settled principles that are im- portant to be known, with a brief statement of the cases that serve to illustrate them : making, at the same time, a reference to the sources from which they Vl PREFACE. were obtained, and where also a greater number of cases, and more minute de- rails of each may be found. The materials of the work have been derived from many different sources. Without presuming to enumerate all, I acknowledge myself particularly indebt- ed to Dr. Beck's Elements of Medical Jurisprudence, Dr. Guy's Principles of Forensic Medicine, Mr. Taylor's Medical Jurisprudence, Dr. Smith's Principles of Forensic Medicine, Paris and Fonblanque's Medical Jurispru- dence; and on single topics, Dr. Montgomery's exposition of the Signs and Symptoms of Pregnancy, Dr. Watson on Homicide, Dr. Kennedy on Preg- nancy and Auscultation, Dr. Kay on Asphyxia, Dr. Christison on Poisons, Dr. Prichard on the Different Forms of Insanity, Dr. Corribe on Mental De- rangement, and Dr. Say on the Medical Jurisprudence of Insanity. I have been careful as far as possible, in all cases, to make a distinct refe- rence to the source from which the fact, principle, or case stated has been de- rived. I have done this in the hope, not only of possessing the reader with the principle, and a brief outline of the case which illustrates it, but also, at the same time, of placing before him such references as will enable him to make fuller investigations in regard to any point or principle he may be interested in studying. It is not, therefore, the exclusive design of this work, to supersede other and more voluminous works on the subjects embraced in it; but to furnish, in as intelligible and concise a form as possible, the substance of what they contain, with references to them for fuller discussions, and minuter details of cases. At the same time, it aims to be sufficiently full and minute in its expo- sition of facts, principles and illustrations, to possess the mind with such an amount of knowledge as may be necessary for all the general purposes for which it may be required Albany, May, 1850. MEDICAL JUBISPRUDENCE. Medical Jurisprudence is that science winch teaches the ap- plication of the practice and principles of Medicine to the eluci- dation and settlement of doubtful questions arising for investiga- tion in courts of law. This science, unlike many others, admits of no clear logical arrangement of the topics which compose it. It is not itself a complete whole, to the production of which all the several parts conspire in a natural order. It consists of many different subjects or topics, mostly isolated, and having with each other few if any intimate connexions. It is, however, a matter of convenience to bring together those subjects that are at all related to each other ; and with that view I propose to follow out, as nearly as possible, the following arrangement, which appears less exceptionable than any that has come under my notice. All the subjects are included under five general heads or classes. The First Class will include questions arising out of the rela- tions of sex. Under this head or class will be comprised, I. Impotence and sterility. II. Hermaphrodites, doubtful sex, monsters. III. Rape. IV. Pregnancy — its signs and indications. V. Legitimacy. VI. Delivery. The Second Class will include questions arising out of injuries inflicted upon the organization. Z MEDICAL. JURISPRUDENCE. This will embrace, I. Infanticide. II. Wounds. III. Poisons. IV. Persons found dead. The Third Class includes questions arising out of diseases, or affections in the nature of disease, that disqualify both from ex- ercising rights and performing duties, being principally insanity, including all the different forms of mental alienation. Tlie Fourth Class includes qusstions arising out of deceptive practices or pretended disqualifications, principally feigned dis- eases. The Fifth Class will include miscellaneous questions, such as age, identity, presumption of survivorship, life assurance and medical evidence. CLASS I. QUESTIONS ARISING OUT OF THE RELATIONS OF SEX. The harmonious movements of general society depend much upon the proper regulation of the relations growing out of the distinction of sex. It is these that lay at the foundation of the domestic relations, which are among the first to which we are subject, and the last from which we are exempted ; and are, per- haps, more than ah others, replete with sources of happiness, or means of misery. It is, therefore, that questions arising out of these relations, have attached to them a deep degree of interest, and demand a free investigation and discussion notwithstanding the great delicacy with which they are very properly regarded by the popular mind. Among these questions the first we shall notice has reference to, I. IMPOTENCE AND STERILITY. These are usually coupled together, and in one respect have a necessary connexion, inasmuch as the existence of the first is always attended by the second as a natural consequence. By Impotence is meant physical incapacity; an inability, from de- IMPOTENCE AND STERILITY. 3 fective organization, or some other cause, to perfoim the genera- tive aet. Sterility may admit the physical capacity, but leaves the act unattended with any fruitful result. In this view of it, the first is the most generally applicable to the male, the last to the fe- male — although both may be applicable to each. The question of sterility, apart from impotence, is seldom or never raised in our courts of law. It is not clear, that in the female there is any means of deciding the question of sterility, except as it forms a part of the question of impotence. Questions of impotence may arise in three kinds of legal in- vestigations : 1 . In suits for divorce : 2. In accusations of rape : 3. In cases of contested legitimacy. In regard to the first, the law of England (1 Blackstone's Com., 440,) admitted impotence as a sufficient cause for an entire di- vorce, or one a vinculo matrimonii, provided it existed before marriage. But if it arose subsequently, it was no such cause Marriage being regarded as a civil contract, having in view the birth and rearing up of children as one of its principal ends, if the incapacity existed previous to its formation, it was of such importance as to be deemed an element of fraud, and hence was sufficient to vacate it. If, on the contrary, it did not arise until subsequently, it could not affect the contract, which was valid and therefore binding in its inception, and one of the ends of marriage, the procreation of children, may have been answered. This doctrine will be found illustrated and applied, in the cases of Briggs VS. Morgan, 3- Phillimore's Ecclesiastical Reports, 425 ; Greenstreet vs. Cumyns, 2 Phillimore, 10 ; Norton vs. Seton, 3 Phillimore, 147 ; Brown vs. Brown, 1 Haggard's Ecclesiastical Re- ports, 523 ; and Pollard vs. Wybourn, 1 Haggard, 725. The ecclesiastical law of England having never been adopted in this country, it is here pretty generally a matter of statute re- gulation. In this State, the Revised Statutes, 2 vol., 142-3, of 1st edition, provides that a marriage contract may be declared void for physical incompetency in either of the parties, whicr 4 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. existed at the time of the marriage. This proceeding can only be had by the injured party, against the other whose incapacity is alleged, and must, in all cases, be instituted within two years from the time of the marriage. A judicial construction has been put upon this part of the section of our statute, in the case of Bevanbagh vs. Bevanbagh, reported in 5 Paige, 554 ; and also in 6 Paige, 175. This was a case in which an unusually firm, dense and strong hymen pre- sented an insurmountable obstacle to the consummation of thu marriage. The principles settled in that case, were substantially the fol lowing : That if there existed the probability of a physical capa city, the court cannot annul the marriage contract ; that the im potence must exist at the time of the marriage, and must be in- curable ; that the party must submit to a surgical examination, if necessary, to determine the fact of impotence ; and that if a slight surgical operation can restore the competency, it must be done, or that a divorce cannot be decreed because it is not done. , An act was passed in Pennsylvania in 1815, providing that if either party, at the time of the contract, was and still is natural- ly impotent, or incapable of procreation, it shall and may be law- ful for the injured and innocent person to obtain a divorce. Impotence, if established at the time of the commission of the alleged offence, would be a sufficient defence on an indictment for rape. So", also, in contested questions of legitimacy, the fact of impotence existing at the period of conception of the claim- ant, would be controlling. The examination, therefore, the most generally has to be made, not only as to the fact of impotence, but also as to whether it did or did not exist at a particular time. Impotence may exist both in the male and female. It may be either absolute or relative. In the first, there is a total incapa- city ; in the second, the incapacity exists only as between parti- cular parties. Again, impotence may be either organic or func- tional, according as it is produced by physical or moral causes. Questions relative to impotence, seldom arise for Investigation, unless it is absolute and organic, arising from physical causes. The three conditions essential to the full and perfect exercis» IMPOTENCE AND STERILITY. 5 of the physical capacity, is erection, intromission and ejaculation of the seminal fluid. The first and third of these belong exclu- sively to the male, the second to the female. A fatal defect in one or more of these, must necessarily result in impotence. Ryan's Medical Jurisprudence, 99. The physical causes of impotence in the male, or those that are generally productive of it, are — 1. Age; 2. Defect or mal- formation of the penis; 3. Defect or disease of the testicles; 4. Constitutional disease or debility. 1. Age: Youth and old age are equally incapacitated. Prior to the seminal secretion, that is, before the age of puberty, sexual intercourse is either entirely impossible, or certainly as to any productive result. The age at which this occurs, varies with the climate, the food eaten, and mode of life, and probably with the constitutional peculiarities of the individual. Any judgment formed in relation to it, must rest mainly on the general conformation of the body, the character of the voice, the growth of the hair, the development of the organs of gene- ration, and the constitutional indications, hereafter mentioned. The young and old have been termed the frozen zones of exist- ence, the intermediate being the torrid zone. Impotence grows out of the infirmity of age as well as the immaturity of child- hood. But at what particular age it supervenes it is impossible to settle upon. It may perhaps be stated as a general rule that the capacity in the male exists from puberty to*the 65th year, but there are so many differences in individual condition as to render any rule that may be laid down of little or no value. In some men the capacity exists to a remote age. Haller pronoun- ces a man of ninety possessed of the capacity. The celebrated Thomas Parr, who outlived nine kings of England, became a father in his one hundred and fortieth year. Impotence, from age, became a question in the celebmted Ban- bury Peerage case, which came before the house of Lords in the year 1813. It was there insisted that the ancestor of the claimant could not have been the son of Lord Banbury, because that nobleman was eighty years of age when the child was born. It waf, hovever, clearly recognized in that case, that the law of 6 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. England admits of no age at which a man may not become a father. It may, therefore, be considered as settled, that neither law nor science can assign any period. in the life of man, when the power of procreation ceases. Each case must be determined upon the circumstances it presents. 2. Defect or malformation of the penis : The entire want of it would produce impotence. When a part remains, it may be difficult to tell, in any given case, whether the physical capacity does or does not exist. The principle deduced from the great number of cases that have occurred seems to bo pretty clearly settled, that if sufficient, of it remains, to admit of introduction within the orifice of the vagina, and there be no im- pediment to the emission of semen, a fruitful intercourse may take place : Guy^s Principles of Forensic Medicine, 54. Several instances have occurred where the glans has been lost, and yet the faculty of procreation has been retained : 1 Paris §• Fon- llanque's Medical Jurisprudence, 202. One case is related, where both the corpora cavernosa were destroyed ; but as the urethral canal was preserved, it did not result in impotence. In another case, a musket shot carried away so considerable a portion of the penis, that when the, wound healed, the organ remained curved; and yet it proved adequate to the performance of its functions. Even where, in consequence of disease followed by amputation, there was only a very small protrusion of the organ on pressure, the patient afterwards be- came the father of two children.' Guy's Principles of Forensic Medicine, 54. Although not a frequent, occurrence, yet there maybe a pa- ralysis of the muscles of the penis, so as to render it incapable of performing its function. So, also, a continued erection may occasion a temporary impotence; the vigor of the erection so closely shutting up the urethra, as that the powers which throw the semen from the vesiculse seminales, are unable to overcome it. 1 Paris Sf Fonblanque's Medical Jurisprudence, 205. There may exist a contracted state of the prepuce or a Phy- mosis, which may so interfere with the discharge of the semen as IMPOTENCE AND STERILITY. 7 to constitute impotence ; but as this is capable of being removed by an operation, it cannot be considered as a permanent cause. 1 Paris 4r Fonblanque's Med. Juris., 204. Size of organ, when much below or above the natural ordina- ry size, has been considered by some as a cause of impotence. Under this head, a very extraordinary case is related by Mr. Wilson, which should induce a great degree of caution in pro- nouncing upon impotence from this cause. 1 Beck's Medical Jurisprudence, 75. He says he was consulted by a gentleman as to the propriety of his entering the marriage state, as his penis and testicles very little exceeded in size those of a youth of eight years of age. He was then twenty-six, and had never felt desire for sexual inter- course until he became acquainted with his intended wife, since which, he had experienced repeated erections, attended with nocturnal emissions. He married, became the father of a family, and those organs which, at twenty-six, were so much smaller than usual, at twenty-eight, had increased nearly to the usual size of those of an adult man. Excessive development can scarcely be regarded as a cause of impotence, as it can rarely, if ever, go to the extent to render impregnation impossible. Guy's Principles of Forensic Medicine, 54. _ Under the same head is also to be included malformation arising from the unnatural situation of the orifice of the urethra. Some- times it opens in the perineeum, occasionally on the dorsum or back of the penis, and more frequently underneath. 1 Paris # Fonblanque, 203. This is termed hypospadia, and in determining the question in any given case, it will be necessary to ascertain whether the orifice of the urethra is situated in that portion of the penis which would be introduced into the vagina in the act of intercourse. If so, under the principle already mentioned, the party cannot be termed impotent. There are a great number of well authenticated cases in which the orifice of the urethra was situated upon the penis, where nol only the physical capacity fully existed, but where the peculiarity itself has been transmitted to offspring. See Guy, 55 ; 1 Beck, 71. and number of cases collected in a note. f» MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. A much more difficult case to decide is where the urethra opens in the perineum. Dr. John Hunter, in a case of this kind, accomplished the purpose of impregnation by causing the semen to be injected by means of a syringe, previously warmed, into the vagina, immediately after the act of intercourse, and during the existence of the venereal orgasm. 1 Paris fy Fonblanque, 203. This certainly shows that great caution should be practiced before pronouncing a party impotent from the malformation arising from the termination of the urethral canal. Instances of impregnation have occurred where the hymen re- mained unbroken, and also where the male organ was not suffered to enter the vagina at all, in which latter cases it is supposed it must have taken place from the mere deposition of the semen upon the vulva. Guy^s Medical Jurisprudence, 56, and authorities there cited. 3. Defect or disease of the testicle : There was once a period in the history of physiology when the testicles were not considered as necessary to virility. From ob- serving that the bull could impregnate the female after castration, Aristotle abandoned the true theory of the function of the testi- cles, and asserted their use to be to serve as weights to hinder the spermatic vessels from being folded up. 1 Paris fy Fonblanque, 1 97 - 8. Notwithstanding, however, the authority of the Stagi- rite to the contrary, they are now regarded as essential to consti- tute virility. It is true, nevertheless, that their removal in a healthy state, after puberty, is not immediately productive of impotence. The instance of the bull above mentioned is a case in point. There is little doubt but that sexual intercourse may take place for a considerable period of time after the removal of both testicles. Sir Astley Cooper mentions a case in which a party for twelve months after the loss of the second testicle, had sexual intercourse accompanied with emissions, afterwards inter course without emission, which became less frequent until the expiration of about ten years, when both ceased. Guy's Principles of Forensic Medicine, 56. Other instances are also mentioned, going to show that in such cases the capacity may exist after castration, for a longw or IMPOTENCE AND STERILITY. i) shorter period, depending probably somewhat upon the circum- stances, and the age and constitutional strength of the party. The loss of both testicles before puberty, would occasion impo- tence. Their loss subsequently would occasion it; but the ques- tion of time would here occur, which might be one of doubt and difficulty. ' ' As impregnation can be but little dependent upon the quantity of semen introduced into the vagina, it may now be considered as well settled that one testicle, if in a healthy state, may be suf- ficient for all the purposes of effecting it. Guy's Med. Juris., 56. Another difficulty that sometimes presents itself is, that no tes- ticles are to be found in the scrotum. In such case the first thing to be determined is, whether they have been removed. If such be the fact, and their removal has been accomplished by excision, this will be indicated by the cicatrices that remain. If no cica- trices are found, the next thing to determine is whether they have descended from the abdomen. They are formed in the cavity of the abdomen, where they remain until the sixth month, after which usually they gradually descend towards the abdomi- nal ring, through which they generally pass into the scrotum be- fore birth. Sometimes the descent does not take place until a late period, and in a few instances they remain in the cavity of the abdomen during life. The effect this may have upon the generative power has been formerly a matter of some dispute, '"but it may now be regarded as well settled, that provided they are well developed, and in a healthy condition, their situation in the abdomen, or in the inguinal canal, in which they are some- times found, does not divest them of the power of performing their functions. If, therefore, the testicles are to be found neither in the groin nor in the scrotum, and no cicatrix indicates their excision, a resort must be had to the general appearance of the body, sound of the voice, growth of the hair and other indications of virility, to determine whether or not the capacity exists. There are also diseases which affect the testicles, some causing a wasting of their structure, others changing their texture : such, for instance, are the elephantiasis and cynanche parotidea. Gm/s Med. Juris., 57. 10 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. So, also, after severe inflammatory action, they may be absorbed by an operation of nature. A severe bruise of the testicles has resulted in their absorption, and thus been productive of im- potence. Chronic inflammation, from any cause, may result In impotence. Cases are sometimes met with, of arrest of develop- ment of the testicles, where in the adult they are no larger than they are ordinarily found to be in a boy of six or seven years of age. Where the process of wasting does not arise from disease of the gland, the testes usually preserve their shape, but feel soft, having lost their elasticity and firmness. Any organic disease of the testicles, such as schirrhus, medul- lary sarcoma, &c, will be likely to cause impotence, provided the entire structure of both testicles is affected. There may also exist mechanical causes, such as congenital scrotal hernia, which by pressure upon the spermatic vessels, may prevent the secre- tion of semen, and thus be productive of impotence. The observations of Baron Larry, as quoted in the Medico- Chirurgical Review for July, 1831, (see vol. 19, p. 15, 16, 17, &c.,) go to show a most intimate connection between the cerebellum and genital organs. Wounds in the cerebellum, or occipital region of the head, have been found to cause an atrophy in the organs of generation, so far as to render the party impotent. On the other hand, wounds in the genital organs, were found by him to exert a reciprocal influence in the production of atrophy in the cere- bellum and occipital region of the head. Instances may occur, in which the structure of the testicle is defective. One instance is given by John Hunter, in which the epydidymis, instead of passing to a vas deferens, terminated in a cul-de-sac. This anomalous structure would prevent the evacu- ation of the semen by the urethra, and thus render the party impotent or sterile. 1 Paris fy Fonblanque's Med. Juris., 201. Sometimes a similar difficulty occurs in the vesiculse seminales,- which, instead of entering the urethra, terminate, after being joined by the vasa deferentia, in imperforated pouches, or cul- de-sacs, producing incurable impotence, lb., 202. 4. Constitutional disease, or debility : There are many diseases which interfere with the generative IMPOTENCE AND STERILITY. 11 function. These are generally remarked to be of that character that affect the head and sensitive system primarily, and those which are accompanied with great debility. Such, for instance, are imflammatory and catarrhal fevers. On the other hand, there are some diseases that appear actually to stimulate the genital organs. Such are gout and rheumatism, calculus of the kidneys and bladder, and sometimes during convalescence, from yellow and other fevers. Guy's Principles of Forensic Med., 59 ; 1 Beck's Med. Juris., 79. The following are enumerated among the injuries and diseases which, from the changes they produce in the system, are ex- tremely likely to produce impotence : " A mutilation, or severe wounds of the sexual organs, carcinoma of the testicles or penis, gangrene of the lower extremities, immoderate evacuations of blood or bile, or of the fceces, scorbutic cachexia, marasmus, peripneumony and hydrothorax, anasarca in its perfect state, (particularly if accompanied with an infiltration into the sexual organs,) nervous and malignant fevers, (particularly if they af- fect thejsrain, and are accompanied with great debility and loss of memory,) all affections of the head and spinal marrow, whether from a fall, blow, wound, or poison, or from internal causes, as apoplexy, palsy, or other comatose diseases. So, also, if affected with leprosy, venereal ozcena, severe cutaneous diseases, or insanity, a reasonable doubt of the tact of cohabitation may be entertained, from the fear the female may be presumed to ex- perience lest she should be contaminated, or from the dread en- tertained of having communication with the individual. 1 Beck\ Med. Jam., 80-81. A. habitude of chastity, too long indulged in, may in time ex tinguish the desire, and impair or destroy the power of erection In such cases, the organs decay, like all other corporeal organs, whose functions are not exerted. Ryan's Med. Juris., 101. So, also, a habitude of indulgence, long continued, and ex cessive, whether with women or by masturbation, produces the same, or, rather, a much worse result. The state or condition to which this leads, is accompanied by involuntary discharges of semen, which, of itself, occasions great debility, and difficulty or 12 MEJICAL JURISPRUDENCE. impossibility of exciting the turgescence of the penis. Dr. Ryan attributes to this excessive indulgence, the fact, often occurring, of want of family in young married persons. Ryan's Med. Juris., 102. The abuses of narcotics, saline refrigerants, acids, acid fruits, iodine, camphor, and nitre, are enumerated by Dr. Ryan among the causes of impotence, lb., 102. Some facts would seem to show that there may be some dis- eases which so change the state of the system, as to produce an alteration in the generative power. Thus Avenzoar had no children during the period of his youth, but became a father shortly after recovering from a violent fever. There was also an artificer who lived twenty-four years with his wife without issue. Shortly after convalescing from illness he became a father and subsequently had many children. Where impotence arises from the operation of causes develop- ing themselves through the constitution of the individual, the following are described es the most frequently attending concom- itants. The hair is white, fair and thin. There is no beard, The countenance is pale. The flesh is soft and without hair.- The voice is clear, sharp, and piercing. The eyes appear dull and sorrowful. The form is round, shoulders strait, and per- spiration acid. The testicles are small, withered, pendulous and soft. The spermatic cords are small, the scrotum flaccid, and the gland of the testicles insensible. There is no capillary growth on the pubes. A moral apathy prevails, and great pusillanimity and fear is present on the least occasion. These are the usual indications of impotence or sterility in the male. Ryan, 101. The mental or moral causes of impotence have their operation upon the mind ; and by means of the effect they produce there, render the genital organs unfit for the exercise of their functions. They operate only upon the mind of the male, and usually attack one condition essential to the generative act, namely, that of erection. The moral causes of impotence are any excessive passion, ex • trerae timidity, alarm or apprehension, disgust, or any other strong working of the imagination, prevailing at the time. The IMPOTENCE AND STERILITY. 13 principle seems to be — the prevalence at the time of any one ab- sorbing emotion, or other intense action of the mind, the effect of which is to withdraw the system from the influences and power to which it is subjected in order to the performance of the act. There is perhaps no fact in the animal economy, that de- monstrates more clearly the influence and power of the moral over the physical state of man, than is to be found in the opera- tion of these moral causes. Any ruling idea that for the time absorbs the mind by concentrating upon itself all the mental energy, deprives the organization of the use of that mental ele- ment without which the phenomenon of erection is never ex- perienced. Guy,60 ; Ryan, 102-3; Smith's Forensic Med., 56-7. One of the most frequent of these causes is the fear itself of being impotent. This has frequently operated to produce this effect. When the moral state had consumed their desires, or substituted other emotions in their place, men supposed there was no physical power, and they were impotent so long as they supposed themselves so. It was in the operation of these moral causes that the powers of magic and witchcraft, the ingenious charms, and amulets that have been invented, have been ena- bled to produce such successful results. Thus a few obscure and unintelligible words written on paper with the blood of a bat, sowed up with a needle which had been used in making shrouds for the dead, and tied around the neck of a new married man, has produced impotence from a moral cause. Ryan 103. So also among the Athenians, an unsuccessful suitor, on the mar- riage of his rival, by tying the locks of his hair, with a certain form of words, had the power of deferring the bridegroom's hap- piness just as many nights as he tied locks of hair. Smith's Forensic Medicine, 457. It is related that an Archon suffered this calamity during the first month of his marriage. These moral causes can seldom arise for investigation in courts of jus- tice, as they are generally curable, being temporary in their na- ture. There seems, however, to have been one moral cause of a per- manent character, and that is aversion. In the case of the Earl of Essex, reported in 1 Har grave's State Trials, 315 : See alsn 14 MEDICAL JLIUSPR,TL^.NVE. 1 Beck, 69, and Smith 489 . the Earl admitted Ms inability to know the Countess of Essex, bat denied kit) impotence as to other females. So also in a case quoted by Gvy^ page €0, the husband was incapable of emission while cohabiting with his wife, although there was no physical obstacle to prevent it, and the same difficulty was not experienced with other persons, and he had had children by a former marriage. The folio wing have been enumerated among the curable causes of impotence. " An atony of the parts, arising sometimes from local disease or external injury, and at others from masturba- tion ; a retraction of the penis, originating from stone in the bladder, or some other urinary disease, a natural phymosis, which sometimes confines the glans in such a manner as to pre- vent the emission of semen ; obliteration of the canal of the uretha, from stricture or other causes ; and a malconformation as to the place of the aperture of the urethal canal. These have all been successfully obviated by modern surgery. 1 Beck 76-7, There are several causes of impotence in the female, mostly affecting the second condition, viz : intromission. Some of these causes are incurable and some curable. Among the incurable, are reckoned an obliteration or thickening of the sexual organs so as to prevent any intromission. Thus the vagina and womb have been found closed with a dense fleshy substance, see 1 Beck, 81, et seq; the vagina has been found entirely wanting, while the uterus has been present. There may be either a natural or fis- tulous communication of the vagina with the bladder or rectum. A prolapsus or retroversion of the uterus, or a prolapsus of the vagina, although curable in their first stages, may, after a long > standing, become incapable of reduction, and thus incura- ble. A cancer of the vagina or uterus from the extreme pain that accompanies it, becomes an absolute cause. There are also some cases on record of such extreme brevity of. the vagina as to render the female sterile, if not impotent. Among the curable causes of impotence in the female are, a dense fleshy substance covering the orifice of the vagina. This substance is most commonly the hymen, preternaturally enlarged and thickened. IMPOTENCE AND STERILITY. lfr This constituted the difficulty in the case of Devanbagh vs. Devanbagh, reported in Uh and 6th Paige, before referred to. This, however, cannot be considered a complete cause of impo- tence, as conception has actually taken place, notwithstanding the obstacle interposed by it. 1 Beck's Med. Juris., 85. There may also exist extreme narrowness of the vagina, which is congenital. This may be removed by the use of emollients, and careful dilatation, as the cause first mentioned may by a surgical operation. The occurrence of tumors and callosities, cicatrices remaining after the cure of ulcers, the result of lace- rations after difficult labor, with other accidental cause«, may 'also originate nearly the same difficulty in the vagina, which may be cured by the same means. In the adult female, adhesion of the labia sometimes takes place as the result of inflammation, or from neglect of accidental ' excoriation^ Even hard labor has sometimes given rise to pre- ternatural union of the labia. 1 Paris fy Fonblanque, 206. In children, the labia are sometimes found adhering together, leaving but a small passage for the discharge of urine. In what- ever way the adhesion may be produced, it is easily curable by a slight surgical operation. Dr. Ryan arranges all the causes of impotence and sterility in females, under three classes. Ryan's Med. Juris., 106. 1. Those depending on the organs which receive the male fluid, viz., the genital fissure, the vagina, and the uterus. The difficulties to which these organs are subject, and the impedi- ments usually found in the way of their exercising their functions, have already been considered. 2. Malformation, or diseases of the organs that transmit that fluid to the ovaries, and re-convey the embryo to the uterus. These are the fallopian or uterine tubes. These may have been, originally, defective in structure, as they have been found with- out any aperture ; or the fimbriated extremity terminating in a cul-de-sac ; or they may have become so obliterated in conse- quence' of peritonea] inflammation, as to lose the power of con- veying the ovum from the ovarium to the uterus. In some cour- tesans, they have become entirely obliterated by the thickening 16 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. of their parieties, a consequence of the habitual orgasm in which they have been kept by too frequent excitements. 3. Malformation, or diseases of the ovaries or organs which supply the germ for fecundation. Paris # Fonblanque, 214. Instances of diseased ovaria are very common, and may arise from a great variety of causes. 1 Paris fy Fcnblanque, 214. In- flammation, ulceration, scirrhus, cancer, ossification, calcareous deposit, or tumors in any of these organs, may be the cause of sterility. Ryan, 106. Sterility is generally considered as confined to the female. The result of impotence is that the subject of it is also sterile. Steril- ity alone is seldom a matter of enquiry in courts of law. It may result from constitutional debility, leucorrhcea or excess or de- ficiency of the menstrual discharge. Sterility is most frequently attended with corpulency ; this latter arising either from weak- ness of the system, or from want of activity in the ovaria. Spayed or castrated animals generally become fat. 1 Paris §• Fmblanque's Med. Juris., 215. So also there may be exhaustion of the uterine system, arising from the practice of too frequent or promiscuous intercourse. Prostitutes seldom conceive ; and young married people, strong, healthy and vigorous, sometimes remain for years without chil- dren. Ibid, 215 ; Ryan, 108. There are also other causes of sterility that are little under- stood, as the fact not unfrequently witnessed of females remain- ing sterile for a number of years, and then again becoming fruit- ful, and also of those who are sterile with one husband becoming fruitful with another. 1 Paris fy Fonblanque, 215. From a review of the whole subject of impotence and sterility, it will be probably a safe conclusion, that the causes of impotence in either sex are few in number ; that these are physical causes • that they mostly consist of permanent malformations, or acciden- tal lesions, evident to the senses ; and that they are those that art cannot remedy. Whenever examinations become necessary to be made, the age, general appearance, habit of body, and state of health, should be noted, and also the diseases with which the individual may have HERMAPHRODITES DOUBTFUL SEX. 17 been previously afflicted. The sexual parts should undergo a careful examination ; the urethra of the male should be sound- ed, and the state of the prostate gland ascertained. The object will be to determine the physical causes of impotence, and also the length of time during which they have existed. Guy, 61-2. II. HERMAPHRODITES— DOUBTFUL SEX— MONSTERS. Inquiries into the subject of Hermaphroditism have occupied some part of the attention of medical jurists, and have found a place in works on medical jurisprudence. The necessity of 'having an intimate knowledge of it, will depend much upon the laws under which the people live, especially those which regu- late the descent of property. Where, for instance, the law of primogeniture prevails, and the preference is given to males, as in England, it becomes important to determine the question of sex, in order to regulate the descent of property, or to decide upon its ownership. Here, therefore, it becomes necessary to determine the sex with accuracy; and this subject will have, therefore, attached to it, a great degree of importance. In a country like the United States, where institutions are more democratic, where males and females are regarded alike in the descent of property ; where estates are fettered by no entails, and the husband's tenancy by the curtesy, has no dependance on the fact of whether his offspring be a male or female, the subject is comparatively of much less moment. Rightly considered, it is a branch of the great subject of impotence and sterility, as one or both generally result from any very great peculiarities in the formation of sex. Hermaphroditism, strictly, means the union of both sexes in the same individual ; the possession in one of the qualities of each, so as to perform the functions of both. Tins is now clear- ly recognized as an impossibility. So far is it from realization in actual fact, that in most or all those cases termed hermaphrodites, there exists the incapacity of exercising the functions of either. Several cases of what are termed hermaphrodites, are collected by Dr. Beck, in his chapter on doubtful sex. 1 Beck's Medical Ju- risprudence, 94. As this may legally be regarded, in this coun- 2 18 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. try, a subject of minor importance, I will merely state some general conclusions derived from the cases that have thus far occurred, without entering into any statement of the cases them- selves. The causes that lead to sexual peculiarities so abnormal as to create doubt in regard to the real sex of the individual, are of difficult or impossible investigation. They may arise from the arrested development of the organs during the growth of the foetus. Taylor's Medical Jurisprudence, 495. From whatever causes arising, they may, perhaps, all be included in some one of the three following classes. 1. Male individuals with such unusual formations of the gene rative organs as, in many respects, to resemble the female. 2. Female individuals with such unusual formations of the same organs as to resemble the male. 3. Where a mixture of the sexual organs of both sexes is ex- hibited, without either being entire. Guy's Medical Jurisprudence, 43. 1 . The first are called Androgyni. In these cases the ambi- guity very frequently consists in the testes being contained in separate parallel folds of the skin ; in an imperforate penis, and in the urethra opening in the perinseum, on the surface of a blind aperture, having a red and tender appearance, so much so as to be mistaken for the vagina. 1 Beck's Medical Jurisprudence, 100. The penis is here considered an enlarged clitoris ; the folds of the skin containing the testes, the female labia ; and the termina- tion of the urethra, the vagina. 1 Beck's Medical Jurisprudence, 101. This class of individuals may have the testes and vesiculse seminales perfect ; but the imperforate penis, and the opening of the ejaculatory ducts near or •in the perinseum, must render them impotent. The strong muscular- development, tone of voice, tastes and habits possessed, indicate the masculine rather than the feminine gender. There are, however, not wanting cases in which there is an enlargement of the breasts, and a preference manifested for the society of the male.- Guy's Medical Juris., 44. A confinement of the penis to the scrotum, by a particular formation of the integuments, has occasioned the individual to be HERMAPHRODITES DOUBTFUL SEX. 19 called an hermaphrodite. In such case a slight incision liberates the restricted parts, and, if the penis is well formed, restores the competency. 1 Beck's Med. Juris., 101 ; Guy's Med. Juris., 44. 2. The second class mentioned are called Androgyna. One peculiarity, occurring probably the most frequently in this class, is an enlarged clitoris. This is no very unfrequent occurrence in warm climates, but has seldom been found in Europe. 1 Beck's Med. Juris., 193. The clitoris has sometimes been found two inches in length, but has neither prepuce nor perforation, and is therefore easily distinguishable. The absence of testicles, presence of a vagina and uterus, oc • currence of menstruation, either or all proclaim the female sex. Another malformation belonging to this class is a prolapsus uteri. Several cases are on record of this description, in some of which, the individual claimed to possess the organs of both sexes, and to be able to employ both. On reduction of the pro- lapsed uterus, the difficulty disappears : 1 Beck's Med. Juris. Ij05. Guy's Med. Juris. 45. 3. The third class embraces those cases in which there is a mixture or blending of the sexual organs without either being entire. Several examples of this class have occurred, and on close examination of them, the predominance of one sex over the other is clearly discernable. 1 Beck's Med. Juris. 94. The principle which has been deduced from the cases that have oc- curred is, that in the two sexes there are organs which corres- pond to each other, and which may be called analogous organs , the penis to the clitoris, the scrotum to the labia, the testes to the ovaria, and the prostate to the uterus ; and that of these analogous organs, no two were ever found together in the same individual. 1 Beck's Med. Juris. 98. No monster has been described, having both a penis and a clitoris; nor with a testis and ovarium on the same side — we may venture to say with testes and ovaria ; nor one having a prostate and uterus. 1 Beck's Med. Juris. 98 : Guy's Med. Juris. 46. An ovary has been found on the left side and a testis on the right, and also a case in which was the reverse of this. Some- times the external organs have approximated closely to the fe- 20 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. male type, and the internal to the male. In other cases the re- verse of this has occurred. Guy's Med. Juris. 46. In cases of doubt or difficulty the following points are entitled to consideration. The growth of the beard and hair on different parts of the body ; the formation of the shoulders and hips ; their relative widths ; the development of the breasts ; the full- ness of the thighs ; the masculine or feminine character of the voice ; the desires excited by the presence of either sex ; the presence or absence of the menstrual or vicarious discharges. In the sexual organs are to be noted the organ corresponding to the penis or clitoris, and whether it is perforate or imperforate ; the form and mode of attachment of the prepuce ; the presence or absence of parts corresponding to the nymphse ; if the labia ma- jora exist, and the presence or absence of the testicles. Any openings which may be found to exist must be examined with a sound, to ascertain whether they communicate with the bladder or uterus, or are merely culs-de-sac. Examination should also be made in reference to the hymen and the carun- cute myrtiformes. Guy's Med. Juris. 46. An ingenious work on hermaphroditism has been published by M. Geoffry St. Hilaire, a notice of which is to be found in 1 Beck's Med. Juris. 108, &c : and Guy's Med. Juris. 46-7. He di- vides the generative apparatus into six different portions or seg- ments, three on a side, which, in several respects, are inde- pendent of each other. The first and second are the deep seated organs, testicles and ovaries ; third and fourth, the mid- dle organs, womb or prostate, and vesicular seminales ; the fifth and sixth are the external organs ; the penis and scrotum, clito- ris and vulva. It is hardly necessary to carry these out into the different classes, as the general result would not, perhaps, be found to be essentially different from what has already been stated. The occasional, although very unfrequent, occurrence of mon- strosities, renders it necessary to advert to the subject of monsters. The common law of England in regard to monsters, which is also applicable in this country, is, that a monster which has not the shape of mankind, but in every part evidently bears the resem- MONSTERS. 21 blanee of the brute creation ; has no inheritable blood, and can- not, therefore, inherit, although brought forth in marriage. But although it may have deformity of body, yet if it have the human shape, it is capable of inheriting. 2 Blackstone's Com., 246. This, in most cases, will serve to define the duty of the medical jurist. That duty will simply be, to determine whether the shape, the outward appearance, be human ; or whether there is so wide a departure from it, or so great a resemblance to the brute creation, as fairly to exclude it from the human family. In this point of view, the classification of them is of small im- portance, as it is of little consequence whether they are such by excess, or defect, or by alteration or wrong position of parts ; the only use of the classification being to enable the medical jurist to come more satisfactorily to his own conclusions. Were the occurrence of monsters much more frequent than they are, many puzzling questions would arise for settlement. It would be a matter of extreme difficulty to determine what precise degree of monstrosity should be required to divest the oeing of his civil rights. There are monsters, for instance, with- out a head, acephalous, — although such could hardly survive birth. There are others, two-headed, dicephalous ; and two- bodied, disomatous. The rule, according to St. Hilaire, (see Tay- lor's Med. Juris., 483,) is, to consider a dicephalous monster, whether it be disomatous or not, as two beings ; and if it have but a single head, under the same circumstances, as one. This rule he grounds upon the performance of the right of baptism in all Christian countries, upon each head, where the monster was dicephalous. There would appear to be as many moral in- dividualities as there are heads. This might give rise to some curious questions in the administration of criminal law. St. Hilaire relates a remarkable case in illustration of this, which he says actually occurred in Paris, in the seventeenth century. A double-headed monster killed a man by stabbing him with a knife. The being was condemned to death, but was not executed on account of the innocence of one of his component halves. Dicephalous monsters seldom livelong after birth. One, how- ever, born in Sardinia in 1829, being double from the head to 22 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. the pelvis, the left bust being named Christina, and the right, Ritta, lived some -nine months from its birth. The Siamese twins, both dicephalous and disomatous, are still living, posses- sing distinct volitions, but movements simultaneous as if they constituted but a single being. Their separate powers of volition should give each a civil and criminal accountability, and yet no severe punishment could be inflicted upon one without involving the other in the same condemnation. As the external shape is the governing consideration, no re- ference is had to the internal conformation. Malformations, transpositions, defects of internal organs, are of little or no con- sequence in a legal point of view. The law, no doubt for wise purposes, disregards those internal deviations in structure from the ordinary normal state, which can only be revealed by dissec- tion after death. III. RAPE. Rape is the having unlawful and carnal knowledge of a woman by force and against her will. This detestable crime both against the individual and against society, has met with a punishment varying in severity among different nations. The laws of diffe- rent countries in regard to the punishment awarded to this crime, are collected by Dr. Beck, in his chapter upon Rape ; 1 Beck, 129, et seq. As the knowledge of these would contribute but little towards enlightening the medical jurist, in regard to what is demanded of him, I shall omit the consideration of them. It may be well enough barely to remark that the punishment awarded has been either death, or a long term of imprisonment, ■ and in some cases a fine and imprisonment, or both. In England the punishment for unlawfully and carnally know- ing and abusing any female under the age of ten years is a felony, and subjects to the punishment of death. If committed on one above ten and under twelve, it is a misdemeanor and liable to imprisonment. A person committing the crime upon the high seas, but within the jurisdiction of the United States, and not within that of any RAPE. 23 particular State, is also deemed guilty of felony, and must suf- fer the penalty of death. Lewis' United States Criminal Law, 557 j and 4 Peters' Stat. 115. In the several States considerable diversity prevails. In Mas- sachusetts the punishment is death. In Virginia, New-Hamp- shire, Connecticut, Maine, New-Jersey, Ohio, Illinois, Michigan, and Tennessee, it is either imprisonment for life or a term of years. The period of ten years is specified. In Vermont, any individual exceeding 1 5 years of age, abusing any female under 11, either with or without her consent, shall suffer fine and im- prisonment. In Indiana, the age of consent in the female is fixed at 12 years, and the punishment imprisonment for a term of years. In Missouri and Arkansas, the punishment for rape un- der ten years is castration ; in Delaware a fine, standing in the pillory one hour, CO lashes, imprisonment not exceeding two years, and afterwards to be sold as a servant for a term not ex- ceeding 14 years. Guy's Med. Juris. 81. In New- York, the Revised Statutes, n. 552, provide that every person who shall be convicted of rape, either 1 . By carnally and unlawfully knowing any female child under ihe age of ten years, or 2. By forcibly ravishing any woman of the age of ten years or upwards, shall be punished by imprisonment in the State prison not less than ten years. It is also provided that every person who shall have carnal Jcnowledge of any woman, above the age of ten years^ without her consent, by administering to her any substance or liquid, which shall produce such stupor, or such imbecility of mind, or weakness of body, as to prevent effectual resistance, shall, upon conviction, be punished by imprisonment in a State prison not exceeding five years. Thus it will be seen that the punishment awarded for the com mission of this crime, although varying in different countries, is in each of them severe. In England, and some of the northern states of the Union, a male under the age of fourteen years is presumed physically incapable of committing the crime, and hence no indictment can be sustained against him In Ohio the 24 MEDICAX JURISPRUDENCE. prima facie presumption is the same, but that presumption may be rebutted by proof, that he has arrived at the age of puberty, and is physically competent to commit the crime. Lewis'' United States Criminal Law, 565-6. A female is presumed incapable of consent while under the age of ten years, so that no force is necessary to be proved in any such case. All present aiding and assisting in the commission of tins crime are principal offenders in the second degree. Lewis' United States Criminal Law, 558. In the case of Lord Caslehaven : 1 St. Tri. 387 : it was decided that a husband might be convicted of a rape upon his own wife, by assisting another person to violate her. Penetration and emission seem to be necessary to constitute the crime of rape, but after several conflicting decisions in the English courts, the one has come to be regarded as prima facie evidence of the other, and the question of emission is a fact for the jury. In New- York the proof of actual penetration into the body is all the statute requires. 2 R. S. 820, ^ 18. In Illinois, Indiana, Tennessee, Pennsylvania and South Carolina, and probably in most of the other States this is sufficient. Guy r s Med Juris. 81. It has been once decided in this State, that force was not ne- cessary for the commission of a rape, but that stratagem might supply its place. Note 1, Wh. C. C. 381. In the case of The People vs. Abbott, 19, Wendell, 192 ; it was held that the prose- cutrix was not privileged from answering questions asked her relative to her previous illicit connexion with the defendant or with others. That it may also be shown that she is a common prostitute, this fact, if true, tending to repel the allegation of force, and laying a foundation for inferring assent on her part. It was also held in this case that the evidence should not be limit- ed to the general character of the witness for truth and veracity • but that proof might also be introduced against her general moral character ; and that particular acts and associations indicating a want of chastity may be shown. In the case of The People vs. Hulse, 3 Hill, 318, the court by Bronson, Justice, after showing the extreme probability that some force may have been used sufficient to overcome a resistance so feebly exerted as to have invited, rather than discouraged the continuance of it ; and then RAPE. "25 subsequently the operation of some po\> erful motive may have induced the woman to call that a rape which in truth was an offence of a much less odious character, proceed to say that in cases of this character, courts and juries cannot be too cautious in scrutinizing the testimony of the complaining witness, and in guarding themselves against the influence of those indignant feelings which are so naturally excited by the enormity of the alleged offence. That there is much greater danger that injustice may be done to the offender in cases of this kind, than there is in prosecutions of any other character. The crime of rape may be committed upon a virgin, a single or married woman, or even upon a prostitute. The latter being also under the protection of the law. The circumstances, therefore, are very greatly multipled, under which the medical jurist is required to make his examination and give his testimony. As the person injured is the witness and sometimes the only one, a great many assignable motives may operate upon her mind to make that out a crime in another which will exonerate her from all personal blame. This, says Sir Matthew Hale, is an accusation easy to be made, and harder tt> be proved, but harder to be defended by the party accused, i hough innocent. The two main facts to be made out on an indictment for a rape are — 1. Forcible penetration: 2. In case of females over ten years of age, that the force used was against the will of the in- jured party. It is principally in proving or disproving the first, that the testimony of medical witnesses is required. In this en- quiry the main points to which the attention is to be directed are the following : 1. "What are the marks of violence, if any, discoverable in the organs themselves 1 2. What marks or indications of actual violence upon the per- sons, either of the prosecutrix or prisoner * 3. What marks or spots of blood, or stains caused by the spermatic fluid, on the clothes of the prosecutrix or prisoner 1 4. What evidence of the existence of gonorrhea or siphilis in one or. both the parties 1 26 MED1CA1, JURISPRUDENCE. 5. The relative age, strength, constitution, habits, situation, circumstances, mental powers and propensities of both the pros- ecutrix and prisoner. 6. The consideration of some medico-legal questions bearing directly upon the facts in dispute. Each one of these 'will re- quire a brief attention. 1. The marks of violence in or upon the organs. In case the injured party is young, and has never been married, the question will probably arise as to what are the physical signs of virginity, and what degree of confidence is to be attached to their presence or absence. Among these physical signs are to be ranked, 1 . The Hymen. There are a number of respectable authorities both for and against the existence of the hymen. It is somewhat varied in its appearance in different females, and this may have led to some misapprehension. It is usually exhibited in the form of a semi-lunar fold, bounding the entrance of the vagina below ; the extremities losing themselves behind the labia minora in the circumference of the aperture of the vagina ; its concavity being behind and its convexity before. Guy's Med. Juris., 66-7. Sometimes it presents the form of a circular membrane, per- forated in the centre, dnd adhering by its circumference to the opening of the vagina. At other times, it fills up the entire orifice of the vagina, except a small opening above, corresponding to the meatus urinarius. There is also one other unusual form of it, in which filaments of mucous membrane are found uniting together the carunculse myrtiformes. Guy's Med. Juris., 67. Owing to the fact that its free edge becomes relaxed and fold- ed, about the period of puberty, there is reason to believe that, when the rupture takes place, it is chiefly in its folds, or de- pressions ; and that, in this manner, the carunculse myrtiformes are formed. These latter subsequently undergo changes, but rarely if ever entirely disappear. Guy's Med. Juris., 67. There can be little doubt, but that the hymen, in some one of its forms, originally exists in the great majority of females. Nor is there any real difficulty in ascertaining its existence, or its re- cent destruction by violence. Its recent destruction would be RAPE. 27 evidence of the recent employment of force, and thus furnish one of the essentials in the proof of rape. As the carunculse myrtiformes are the remnants of the destroy- ed hymen, their presence would prove the destruction of the hymen at some earlier period. The absence of the hymen must not be assumed as evidence that the female is unchaste. It may have been originally wanting. If not, a number of causes, other than connexion, may have destroyed it. It may have been de- stroyed, if the aperture be small, by the first menstrual iiux, or by the accumulation of other discharges. It may also have been destroyed as the result of accident, or by the intentional intro- duction of foreign bodies, or by the occurrence of disease. On the other hand, the existence of the hymen must not be hastily assumed as evidence of chastity. There are several in- stances on record, where sexual intercourse has taken place, and where conception has actually occurred, while the hymen re- mained entire. What is still more extraordinary, instances are cited, where children have been born without destroying it. Guy's Med. Juris., 67-8 ; 1 BecWs Med. Juris., 113. It seems pretty evident, therefore, that no very great degree of importance should be attached to the presence or absence of the hymen. 2. Narrovmess of the vagina. In the virgin state, the only function performed by the vagina, is the transmission of the menstrual flux from the uterus. For this, a very inconsiderable passage is sufficient. Its natural tendency is to narrowness, both from its'own contractility and the pressure of surrounding parts. The turgescence caused by the greater determination of blood to the organs at the period of puberty, would also tend to place the parts in closer contact with each other. Various inno- cent causes may, however, relax and enlarge it ; such as disor- ders to which the parts may be liable, and also a resort to certain practices. In the virgin state, there are usually to be found rugse on the inner surface of the vagina. These are removed by frequent connexions, and destroyed by one or two deliveries. All these are liable to some variation, from the age, state of 28 MEOICAL JURISPRUDENCE. health, and temperament of the individual. Smith's Forensic Medicine, 410-11 ; 1 Beck, 115. 3. Another indication is drawn from the appearance of the carunculse myrtiformes. When red, tumid, and connected to- gether by fleshy cords, they are said to indicate chastity ; .while in the married slate, they are pale, flaccid, and the cords torn asunder. 1 Beck's Med. Juris., 116. There are also other indications to be derived from an ex- amination of the organs. These are principally the red and tumified appearance of the labia and nympha?, and rupture of the fourchette. There are also others, but of so equivocal a / character, as not to deserve being mentioned. These signs of virginity are the most perfect between the period of puberty and the twenty-fifth year. Ryan's Med. Juris., 161. There have been various degrees of importance attached to their presence and absence. Each and all of them are undoubt- edly equivocal, but there is a reluctanGe in denying that talcing them all together, there is not some considerable importance to be attached to them. It has been asked, whether all can be entirely wanting, without furnishing any inference that the per- son is unchaste 1 The degree of importance attached to them should probably depend very much upon the circumstances ex isting at the time. In regard to the presence or absence of these signs of virginity and the proofs they furnish of penetration by force, the follow ing inferences are obvious : 1. The younger the subject, the less strong will be the signs of virginity ; but the more marked will be the evidence of vio- lence done to the parts. 2. The more recent the injury inflicted, the more clear and satisfactory will be its physical indications. 3. In the case of married women, or those accustomed to sexual intercourse ; or, with the exception of very young sub- jects, where the examination is not made within a very few days after the infliction of the injury, this source of evidenc/3 is of little or no value. RAPE. 29 The object to be accomplished by an appeal to this source of proof, is, 1 . To prove the commission of the crime in subjects so young as to be incapable of giving their consent, and also of being wit- nesses in a court of justice : 2. To corroborate the testimony of the injured party, after she has attained the age of consent, and sufficient understanding to entitle her to be a witness : or, 3. To contradict her evidence after the arrival of the period last mentioned. After the arrival of the age of consent, the crime of rape is not made out by proof of penetration by force. Another mate- rial element is then wanting, viz., that it was against the will of the injured party. In proving or disproving this, it is obvious very little can be expected of the medical witness. What he can furnish, is derived, principally, 2. From marks, or indications of violence found upon the per- sons of the prosecutrix ©r prisoner. On the person of the for- mer, these will be found in the rumpled or torn appearance of the dress, and in the shape of bruises, generally on the groins, thighs, knees, arms and chest. The person of the latter may also exhibit bruises and scratches. In reference to these, should be carefully noted, 1 . Their position. They may be on parts or in positions that would not be exposed to the prisoner, and hence afford evidence that they were self-inflicted, for the purpose of sustaining her testimony. Her willingness or unwillingness to submit to exami- nation, might furnish some indication. 2. Their appearance, particularly their color, as indicating the period of time that had elapsed since the injuries were inflicted, with the view of comparing this time with the statements of the accuser. The variation of ecchymosed or bruised spots, in color, as time elapses after their infliction, will be noticed when on the subject of wounds. It must not, however, be supposed that the presence of bruises or other injuries upon the person of the prosecutrix, is conclusive proof that consent was not given. They may have been, 30 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. 1. Self-inflicted, with the view to sustain her testimony and to make out the case on the part of the prosecution ; or, 2. Notwithstanding the violence, the conduct of the female may have been such as to imply consent on her part ; or, 3. She may have consented after the infliction of the violence The two latter are, perhaps, hardly consistent with a resort to any very great degree of personal violence. 3. The third source of proof is derived from any marks or spots of blood, or stains that may be caused by the spermatic fluid, on the clothes of the prosecutrix or prisoner. In case of recent injury spots of pure blood, presenting an uniform red color throughout, might be found on the clothes. After suflicient time had elapsed for the first haemorrhage to cease, there will be a muco-sanguinolent discharge, staining the linen but less deeply, and uniformly, leaving a spot lighter in the centre but of a deeper color around the circumference. The co-existence of these with marks of violence would be a corroboration of the charge. Guy's Med. Juris., 73. Care must be taken not to confound this with the menstrual discharge. The blood resulting from injuries of this character would be arterial, and the menstrual blood is distinguishable from this — 1 . By its non-coagulable qualities. As it contains little or no fibrine it is not coagulable. 2. By its color. It is darker than arterial blood, and does not, like venous blood, change color by exposure to the air. Guy's Med. Juris., 73-4. In relation to stains caused by the spermatic fluid, if a fluid is found having a seminal appearance it should be examined under the microscope, and if it be found to contain animalculse, little doubt can remain of its being semen. These animalculee are found in the semen of all male animals which have reached the age of puberty. While in motion, they present a spherical figure with filamentous tails. At rest, or dead, the fluid about them being dried up, they appear more oval with a tapering tail. Guy's Med. Juris., 74. These animalculee may be discovered in semen that has be RAPE. 31 ^.jme dry, provided it be carefully moistened. They have even oeen discovered in semen that had become pui.*id. Care must be taken not to rub or injure the pieces, as that would destroy their organization. After steeping the stained pieces thoroughly in distilled, water, they may generally be detected by the micro- scope. These seminal spots are of a color yellowish or grayish, and, when pressed between the finger and thumb, appear slightly stiff as if starched. They are inodorous, but when moistened give out the seminal odor. Exposed to heat, the spots become of a yellow fawn color, and small whitish spots make their ap- pearance. This effect is said, to be' peculiar to the spermatic fluid. Gunfs Med. Juris., 75. A seminal spot placed for some hours in cold distilled water is moistened evenly throughout, and gives out a spermatic odor. The liquid in which it is moistened becomes milky white and flaky, and in its characters or properties is, 1. Alkaline : 2. Mucilaginous. It does not coagulate, although it deposites jtwc glutinous flakes : 3 Evaporated, the residuum becomes semi-transparent, and nhtn agitated in cold distilled, water, divides into two parts, the one greyich yellow, glutinous, and insoluble in water, the other soluble Li water : 4. The watery solution is yellowish, transparent, giving a white flocculent precipitate with chlorine, alcohol, acetate and sub-acetate c\ lead, and corrosive sublimate. Nitric acid gives it a yellowish tir^e, but causes no precipitate. In all these, those which are the irost peculiar to semen are the change of color on exposure to the fire, and the peculiar odor emitted. Guy's Med Juris., 75-6. 4. The fourth source of proof is that derived from the exist- ence of gonorrhea or syphilis in one or both the parties. Should venereal infection coincide, in its appearance, with the time at wMch the crime is alleged to have been perpetrated, it would afford, proof of violation. To do this it should appear from the third to the eighth Jay after the crime is alleged to have been 32 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. committed. Should it manifest itself immediately after it would have no other influence upon the decision of the case except the proof it would furnish that the female was unchaste. Should the examination be made some days after the injury complained of. and the disease should be found present in the female, it would prove her unchaste, provided it were absent in the accused, but if present in both would be a strong corroboration of the charge.. It should be borne in mind, however, that there are discharges from the vagina of young females, especially of children, of a nature entirely different from that resulting from venereal infec- tion. Several instances are on record where mistakes in this respect have come very near resulting in serious consequences See the case of Jane Hampson, as detailed in Ryan's Med. Juris } 165, and also in 1 Beck's Med. Juris., 119. Sir A. Cooper places much stress upon this, and says that children from one year old and even under, up to puberty, are frequently the subjects of a purulent discharge from the puden- dum, chiefly originating beneath the preputium clitoridis. The nymphse, orifice of the vagina, and the meatus urinarius, are in an inflamed state and pour out a discharge. He supposes he has met with thirty cases of it in the course of his life. When this occurs there is a heat of the parts, slight inflammation, and tliis sometimes increases and goes on to ulceration. Ryan's Med. Juris., 168. Dr. Dewees also confirms this statement, and says that we oc- casionally find that very young children have a discharge from within the labia, of a thin, acrid kind, or of- purulent appear- ance. Also that children of a more advanced age have discharges •-if a purulent character, that seem to arise from a morbid action of the mucous membrane of the vagina or labia. This frequently shows itself about the fifth year, and may continue, if neglected, to almost any period. Ryan's Med. Juris., 168. If, therefore, on examination, a discharge should be found, the medical witness should make a thorough examination into the nature and causes of it, before he can pronounce it the result of venereal infection. This disease has been repeatedly observed by American physi- RAPE. 33 cians, and exists independent of external violence or of any sy- philitic aifection. According to Dr. Francis, no case has been noticed among us, where the individual had advanced beyond her seventh year, but this may have been accidental, and should not be relied upon as proving that it does not occur beyond that age. There is, however, no doubt of the fact that its occurence in the very great majority of cases is early in life, and this is a circumstance by no means to be lost sight of by the medical ju- rist. Guy's Med. Juris., 72. 5. The fifth source of evidence relates to the age, strength, constitution, habits, situation, circumstances, mental powers and propensities of both the prosecutrix and the prisoner. This em- braces a very wide range of proofs, and generally constitutes much of the evidence usually introduced on trials of indictments for rape. It is obvious from the statement of it, that the mere ( medical witness cannot, in virtue of what he derives from his profession, throw much light upon this source of evidence. , Medical men, it is true, ought, and most probably do, under- stand much better than others, the precise extent of organic ca- pacity, and the amount of energy and power which are capable, in any given case, of being put forth either by way of subduing or resisting. They cannot only judge more accurately of the con- stitutional capacity, but they can also, better than others, appre ciate the modifying eifect of age, and the influence that may be supposed to be exerted by habits, situations and circumstances. More especially where one of the parties is laboring under the effects of disease, must the medical examiner be relied upon to state what influence or effect that would be likely to exert upon the promptings of desire, and the exertion of physical power. Where the strength of the parties is greatly disproportioned, as where a sound healthy adult male is charged with the commis sion of the crime upon a female under the age of puberty, no doubt can be entertained of the possibility of its commission by force. Prior to the period of menstruation, the female not only labors under a great deficiency of bodily strength, but her mind has fewer resources, and far less power and energy of will. She is also probably ignorant of the consequences of the acty. 3 34 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. and hence her compliance may be more easily induced by fear. So also if she be infirm in body, or laboring under the effects of disease, while the accused exhibits much strength and vigor, her complaint will be much more readily believed. If her imbecility of mind be such as not only to deprive her of the ordinary re- sources to which other minds of her age can resort, but also to destroy its moral tone, and render her incompetent to judge of the morality of her actions, she cannot be supposed competent to interpose any effectual resistance. So on the other hand, if the accuser is a firm, vigorous, strongly constituted female, and the accused is cachectic, or of a weak, sickly constitution, she will hardly, unless under peculiar circumstances, be considered entitled to full belief. Accusations against persons over sixty years of age should in general be re- jected, unless they can be proved to possess an extra amount of strength and virility. 1 Beck's Med. Juris., 122. Where the accused and accuser are both in the full possession of health and strength, and of the ordinary amount of physical and mental power, the perpetration of this crime must be of difficult, if not of impossible, occurrence. The opinion of medical jurists generally, is against the strong- est probability, if not possibility, of its full and perfect accom- plishment, where, under such circumstances, the woman retains her mental powers unimpaired, and also her bodily, except so far as they may be exhausted by her efforts at resistance. Al- though the attempt may be' made, yet its successful consumma- tion, under these circumstances, must be certainly, to say the least of it, a very rare occurrence. It may, however, be true, that the female may possess less coolness and deliberation in husband- ing her strength, and by an early expenditure of more than may be necessary, in efforts of resistance, sooner produce a state of exhaustion. The following are the usual exceptions, where the crime may be perpetrated notwithstanding the parties may approach nearly to a mental and physical equality : 1. Where narcotics or intoxicating liquids have been adminis- tered to her.: RAPE. 35 2. Where she falls into a state of syncope, from terror and exhaustion : 3. Where many are engaged against her, and in such case, there are usually many marks of injury about her person : 4. Where she yields under the influence of some severe threat, such as that of death or duress. Taylor's Med. Juris., 462. The crime may be perpetrated under any of these circumstances, none of which furnish any excuse or palliation. 6. The consideration of some medico-legal questions, bearing directly upon the facts in controversy. Under this head, come up for consideration two questions which have occasionally arisen for discussion in connection with the trial of indictments for rape : 1 . Can a female be violated during sleep, without her know- ledge 1 This question has been answered in the aflirmative by the medical faculty of Leipsic, and in the negative by the ju- ridical faculty of Jena. It must depend much upon the circum- stances of the case. If the sleep has been caused by narcotics, or by intoxication, or in case of syncope, or excessive fatigue, it is certainly a very possible occurrence, and would sustain the charge of rape. The possibility of it is denied in a case of natu- ral sleep, and where the female is a virgin, Guy's Med. Juris., 77 ; 1 Beck's Med. Juris., 148-9. It has been supposed possible, even in natural sleep, with fe- males accustomed to sexual intercourse. Indeed, this would seem to be well established, from the fact that there exist cases where pregnancy has resulted from such intercourse had during the sleep of the female. The case, however, must be of very rare occurrence, in which the sleep, when purely natural, can be so profound, as, with such females, to admit the full act of sexual intercourse without their knowledge. 2. Does pregnancy ever follow rape 1 If it never does, then its subsequent occurrence, with some rare exceptions, would be proof of consent, and would be, therefore, a suflicient defence to an indictment for rape. This might furnish adequate cause to delay the trial of the prisoner until suflicient time had elapsed- to determine whether pregnancy did or did not exist. Those who assert that it never does follow, incline to the be- 36 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. lief that the venereal orgasm is always necessary to conception j and that the fear, terror, horror and aversion that accompany rape, must effectually prevent its occurrence. It has been sug gested, that notwithstanding the sedative effect- of these passions the orgasm may nevertheless take place, as its occurrence o? non-occurrence is not dependent upon volition. 4 Good's Study of Medicine, 100. The more prevailing opinion seems now to be, that the func- tions of the uterine system are independent of the will; and that conception may, therefore, occur, whatever be the volitions of the sexes, or the operation, at the time, of the emotions and passions. The fact that it has taken place when the female was, at the time, under the influence of narcotics, of intoxication, of asphyxia, and in a state of sleep, certainly shows that neither the operations of mind, nor the venereal orgasm, are in any degree necessary to its occurrence. Guy's Med. Juris. , 77 -8 ; 1 Beck's Med. Juris., 149 - 50. It now only remains to direct the attention to the points of inquiry that should arise,- in cases of alleged rape. The complaining party should be immediately inspected, and the time of the inspection compared with that at which the offence is alleged to have been committed. The age, size, strength, and general habit should be observed, and any injuries on her person should be compared with the cause assigned for their infliction. The state of the clothes should also be remarked. The organs of generation should be particularly examined. It should be remarked whether they are natural in appearance, or swollen, inflamed, abraded or ulcerated ; whether there is any discharge, and, if so, from what part it flows; whether the hymen is present and entire, or ruptured ; whether the carun- cute myrtiformes are visible ; whether the fonrchette is injured, and the vagina enlarged or narrow. Ascertain, if possible, whether the alleged violation took place during the menstrual •period, or while laboring under any debilitating discharge. It would be well, if possible, to ascertain the date and origin of all the marks or indications of violence found, with the view of RAPE. 37 determining whether some other cause than that alleged, might not have contributed to their production. Foreign bodies have been sometimes purposely applied to, or' introduced into the parts. Every discharge should be carefully observed, collected and examined, to determine whether it is the result of gonorrhoea, Ieucorrhcea, &c. Any spots, apparently of blood or semen, should be tested in the way already alluded to. In case death has taken place, the body should be examined, to see whether any bruises, fractures, or dislocations are present It should be ascertained whether any foreign bodies have been thrust into the mouth. If practicable, the spot on which the offence is alleged to have been committed, should be examined, to compare it with the appearances discovered on the body of the female. The person of the accused should also be examined, with the view of ascertaining whether any bruises, scratches, or other marks of resistance are discoverable ; whether there are any spots of blood or semen on his linen ; and also what is his size, strength, health, and bodily development. The organs of gene- ration should be examined, to discover whether he is impotent, or capable of producing the amount of injury discoverable on the female ; and also, whether he have the venereal disease, and if so, what is its stage, or how long he has probably had it. Guy's Med. Juris., 78-9. IV. PREGNANCY. There are few subjects within the range of Medical Jurispru- dence, that gather around them a greater degree of interest than the signs and indications of Pregnancy. Independent of the bearing they have, and the influence they exert upon domestic and social life, the occasions when the investigation of them is rendered legally necessary, are neither few nor unimportant. Some occasions exist in England for this investigation which do not in this country. One is that proceeding under the com- mon la-v, where a widow is suspected to feign herself with child. S8 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. in order to produce a supposititious heir to the estate, and thus to defraud the lawful heir. The presumptive heir may in such case have a writ de ventre inspicimdo, by which the sheriff is com- manded to have search made, and the fact determined whether pregnancy exists or not, by twelve matrons in the presence of twelve knights. If the result determine the fact of pregnancy, then she is to be kept under proper guards until she is delivered. If the pregnancy is negatived, the presumptive heir is admitted to the inheritance. The most remarkable case illustrating this, is that of Sir Francis Willoughby, reported in Crokes Elizabeth, 566. The practice has been somewhat modified in a recent case, so as to appoint two medical men with two matrons to visit the female every fortnight, instead of the examination to be made by th< jury of matrons in the presence of the knights as was required by the earlier practice. Another occasion when it becomes necessary to enquire into, and ascertain the fact of pregnancy, is when a woman is convicted of a capital crime and pleads pregnancy. In such a case, if the fact of pregnancy appeared on the examination, the execution was respited until after the delivery. According to the common law of England, in case this plea be made in stay of execution, the judge must direct a jury of twelve matrons, or discreet women, to ascertain the fact ; and if they bring in their verdict quick with child, (for barely with child un- less it be alive in the womb, is not sufficient,) execution shall be stayed generally till the next session, and so from session to ses- sion, till either she is delivered or proves by the course of nature not to have been with child at all. 4 Blackstone's Ccm., 394-5. In Scotland, all that is necessary to be proved to have execu- tion delayed, is the fact of pregnancy, no difference being made whether she be quick with child or not. This is also the provi- sion of the French penal code upon this subject. 1 Beck's Med. Juris., 155-6. These provisions have the merit not only of leaning strongly to the side of mercy, but also of being founded upon just and sound physiological principles. It is not a little singular that with all the light and knowledge PREGNANCY. 39 there is upon that, and other kindred subjects, the late Revised Statutes of New- York, should not have contained mqre enlight- ened provisions on this subject. They provide that in case of pregnancy in a female sentenced to capital punishment, the sheriff shall summon a jury of six physicians, and give notice to the district attorney who has power to subpcena witnesses. If on the inquisition the female is proved to be quick with child, the execution shall be suspended, and the inquisition transmitted to the governor. Whenever he is satisfied that she is no longer quick with child, he is to issue his warrant for execution, or to commute it by imprisonment for life in the State prison. 2 R. S 658. Quickening, as we shall see hereafter, has no certainty as to the time of its occurrence, but it usually takes place about four months after conception. An infant is the inheritor of real estate from the moment of its conception. In this case, therefore, the law presents the singular anomaly of investing an infant, at its conception, with the inheritance, and the rights appertaining to the ownership of real estate, and yet four months afterwards of executing it unheard for the crime of its mother. There is also another case in which the law of England has interfered on the fact of pregnancy being brought to the know- ledge of the court, and that is where a female in this situation is imprisoned. In such case she is admitted to bail to prevent the peril of death to her and her infant. Guy's Med. Juris., 87-8. It is not on these important occasions alone that it may become necessary to ascertain the fact of pregnancy. There are many others where its investigation becomes necessary. It may be attempted to he feigned by the unmarried, with a view to extort money ; or to induce a paramour or seducer to marry ; or in an action brought for breach of promise of marriage, she may al- lege pregnancy as a means of influencing the jury in the assess- ment of damages. Guy's Med. Juris., 85. The married may also feign it to gratify the wishes of a hus- band, to produce a supposititious heir to the estate, to delay the execution of capital punishment, or to escape from imprison- ment 40 MEDiCAL JURISPRUDENCE. There are also motives that may induce its concealment. Both the married and unmarried, particularly the latter, may attempt it to avoid disgrace, or with a view of procuring abortion, or of committing infanticide. Thus the occasions are numerous which may require the medi cal jurist to determine the existence or non-existence of this fact. And it must also be borne in mind that he may, and most com- monly is, called upon to do this under the most unfavorable cir- cumstances. It not unfrequently happens in such cases that he cannot rely on a single statement made by the individual who may be the subject of examination ; but, on the contrary, he must be prepared for every species of falsehood and misrepre • sentation. Montgomery's Signs of Pregnancy, 30. Under these circumstances, and the pressure of these difficul- ties, the medical jurist will naturally resort to all the sources of proof accessible in questions of this character. These sources are various, and widely different, some depending upon the re- port made or the information furnished him, while others consist in the changes induced and cognizable by the senses. The signs and indications of pregnancy are derived principally from-two sources. These are, 1 . The changes that occur in the constitution of the female, consequent upon conception : 2. The sensible changes and indications that are caused by the development of the uterine system. The first change from the normal state which follows concep- tion, is to be found in the uterine system. There is an imme diate determination of blood to this system. A new principle is introduced, whose modifying influence is to extend through the whole economy. There is a great increase of vascularity in the uterus and its appendages. Its vessels are distended with blood ; its tissues infiltrated with serum ; its bulk increased ; texture softened; fibres separated; and such a remarkable increase of vital action takes place in it, that it is thrown into a state which has been termed k ' analogous to inflammation. Hunter on Gravid Uterus, 82 ; Montgomery's' Signs of Pregnancy, 2. Nor is the change limited to the circulating system. The PREGNANCY. 4] nerves of the uterus are observed to increase liotli in number and in size They consequently impart to it a higher degree of sensibility. Their close connexion with the great abdominal plexuses, enables them quickly to diffuse their influence through the general system, which is found soon to sympathize with this local excitement. The changes, therefore, effected in the general system, in con- sequence of the uterine development, may be expected to be somewhat marked and decided. It should, however, be under- stood, that, owing to differences of temperament, and organic peculiarities, the varieties in the female constitution are very great, and hence, that although the changes that can be collected from all the varieties are strongly marked and decided; yet when their application comes to be made to any individual case, very many of them may be wanting. The round ligaments of the uterus are stretched by its en- largment ; from which, and from the increased sensibility of their nerves, an uneasiness is frequently felt, which extends along the nerves of the thigh, producing numbness, cramp, and considera- ble pain along the limb. These symptoms are often among the earliest indications of uterine irritation. Montgomery's Signs of Pregnancy, 4. After pregnancy is somewhat advanced, it is not unusual for the uterus, by its pressure upon the trunks of the veins, to cause anasarcous swellings of the feet and legs, and sometimes varicose veins and hemorrhoidal tumors. As there is also some- times an oedema of the upper extremities and face, there would seem to be, occasionally, a more general cause than the pressure just mentioned. Montgomery's Signs of Pregnancy, 5. The increased vascular action produced in the uterus after con ception, frequently extends through the entire system, inducing a somewhat plethoric state of the blood vessels. So, also, the in- crease of nervous irritability displays itself under a variety of forms, rendering the female more excitable, and more subjected to the influence of the emotions and passions, especially those of fear, joy, sorrow, and anger. Many melancholy instances are on record, of the unfortunate results of the influence of these 4i MEDICAL JUItlSPUUDENCE. passions upon nervous females, during the period of utero-gesta- tion. Montgomery's Signs of Pregnancy, 12-13-14, et seq. The effect of this nervous irritation not unfrequently works a change in the moral temperament, evidenced by depression and despondency, rendering her peevish, irritable, capricious and wayward. This usually disappears, giving place to natural cheer- fulness, as pregnancy advances, especially if it be connected with good bodily health. Montgomery' 's Signs of Pregnancy, 18-19. In other cases, the depression deepens with time, and is ac- companied by an apathetic indifference to circumstances and events. Occasionally the cerebral disturbance proceeds so far as to amount to absolute derangement of some one or more of the faculties of the mind, lb., 20. In some cases, a great tendency to drowsiness exists, which is so great in degree, that it requires the severest effort to overcome it Montgomery' 's Signs of Pregnancy, 1 50 - 51 . An alteration is sometimes to be noticed in the features and expression^ of the countenance, which is termed by the French writers a decomposition of the features. They are observed, especially the nose, to become sharper, and more elongated ; the mouth larger ; the eyes sunk, and surrounded with a brownish or livid areola, having a languid expression. The body, except the breasts and abdomen, becomes more emaciated. Montgomery's Signs of Pregnancy, 150. Strange appetites and antipathies are not anunfrequent attend- ant of pregnancy. Longings for revolting articles, and aversions founded on no reason, characterize this condition of the system. Hid, 151-2. In some females, pains in the teeth and face are invariable accompaniments of pregnancy. There are also some instances in which dark spots or blotches appear upon the face and other parts of the skin, and they have sometimes been permanent. Ibid, 152-3. Some women, during this state, are troubled with frightful dreams, proceeding probably either from disorder of the aliment- ary canal disturbing the irritated nervous system, or from an irregular or undue circulation of blood in the brain. Rid 153. PREGNANCY. 43 Another accompaniment that has been mentioned is a peculiar headache, consisting of an acute pulsating pain in the occipital region, accompanied with giddiness on motion, coming on sud- denly and succeeded by inclination to sleep. As headache may be produced by a variety of causes it cannot be much relied on. Ibid, 153-4. It has been asserted that the blood of pregnant women always presents the buffy coat and other characters of inflammation, but experience has shown that no reliance can be placed On this as an evidence of pregnancy. In females of full habit, sanguine temperament, and where the pulse is accelerated, the blood may present some of the modified characters of inflammation up to the third or fourth month of utero-gestation. Montgomery's Signs of Pregnancy, 155 — 6. Indications have also been sought to be drawn from the appear ance exhibited by the urine of pregnant women. By allowing the urine to stand some thirty or forty hours a deposit is some- times found to take place of white, flaky, pulverulent, grumous matter, being the caseum, or peculiar principle of milk, formed in the breasts during gestation. In many instances the deep color and turbid condition of the urine will prevent the deposit from being observed, but where it is clear, it appears as if a little milk, having been thrown into the urine, had partly reached the bottom, while a part remained suspended and floating through the lower part of the fluid, in the form of a whitish semi-trans- parent filmy cloud. Montgomery's Signs of Pregnancy, 157-8. Although Dr. Montgomery seems from his experience, to at- tach considerable importance to this indication, yet it would seem from some specimens of urine submitted to examination, that a white flocculent precipitate, similar to that described, sub- sided spontaneously after twenty-four hours, not only from the urine of pregnant women, but also in equally great quantity from that of a virgin of the age of fourteen, and that of a woman nurs- ing for two months. Dr. Kennedy supposes this indication of no value. Kennedy on Pregnancy and Auscultation, 56 - 7. There is also an appearance somewhat different from this, upon which reliance has been placed. The urine, after stand- 44 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. ing one or two days, becomes turbid, and in case of pregnancy, fatty globules rise to the surface, forming a pellicle resembling that left on the surface of mutton broth on cooling. This remains swimming on the surface for three or four days, and is termed Kiestein. It breaks up and disappears as the urine becomes putrid. It continues faintly acid until the breaking up, when it developes ammonia. This should not be confounded with the earthy phosphate which forms on the surface of the urine after Jong repose, as that is developed by putrefaction, while this is destroyed by it. Guy's Med. Juris., 92. It should, however, be borne in mind, that many accidental causes are capable of altering the condition of the urine ; so that great caution should be exercised in reference to any deduction to be drawn from this source of proof. An indication is also sought to be drawn from the state of the pulse. This has been so thoroughly refined upon, that some have professed themselves able to discover from it, not only the faet of pregnancy, but also its period of advancement, and even the sex of the child. Montgomery's Signs of Pregnancy , 158. All that can with safety be said on this subject, probably, is, that during the earlier periods of gestation, the pulse is general- ly stronger and more rapid than is natural to the individual at other times. But among the multitude of causes that may ex- cite to increased action, this certainly should have little or no reliance placed upon it. Dr. Osiander has remarked, that during gestation, the uterine artery is enlarged, as is also the vagina], and that the action of the latter is increased, so that its pulsations may be ascertained to be both stronger and harder, and its calibre greater than usual. See Montgomery's Signs of Pregnancy, 1 58 - 9 Many of the signs and indications already mentioned, are only occasional, but their occurrence during the first pregnancy, ren- ders it more probable that they will be present during the sub- sequent ones of the same individual. There are other signs and indications that are found more generally present. Among the most prominent of these are — Suppression of the menses, or catamenia. This is a discharge arising from a secretion from the internal surface of the utejus, PREGNANCY. 45 which occurs at periodical, usually monthly intervals, and con- tinuing, with few exceptions, from puberty to the approach of old age. Kennedy on Pregnancy and Auscultation. The exceptions are when the functions of the organ are al- tered or suspended, as during pregnancy, nursing, or in a state of disease. As a general rule this discharge is suspended during pregnan- cy. But conception may have occurred previous to its com- mencement. Of this there are cases on record. Montgomery's Signs of Pregnancy, 41-2. There are also cases in which women have conceived after menstruation had apparently ceased. There are also cases of somewhat rare occurrence where women have conceived when the menses have been long suppressed in conse- quence of disease. Ibid, 43. Some women are very irregular in the returns of these periods, having them delayed beyond the usual intervals. At the period denominated the change of life, they are sometimes suppressed, for two or three months, and then return profusely. Ibid, 43. • Suppression may arise from many causes independent of con- ception. It may be caused by different forms of disease, by ex- posure to cold and hardship, by severe mental emotions, more particularly by that of fear. Ibid, 43. Of this latter there are/ numerous instances occurring, especially in prisons, where fe- males are confined under very unfavorable circumstances. In young and recently married females it is not unusual that suppression occurs for two or three periods, the breasts at the same time increasing in size and becoming sensitive. After the lapse of two or three months, what appears an ordinary men- struation occurs, and in tins manner these indications of concep- tion pass away. They are frequently supposed to be miscarriages, and it is not at all improbable that conception really took place, but the ovum soon after perishing, ah the signs and indications passed away. Montgomery's Sig?is of Pregnancy, 4A. The high authority of Denman, sustains the rule that " sup pression of the menses is one of the never failing consequences of conception." To this, however, there are certainly excep- tions. There are certainlv instances in which menstruation oe 4(5 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. curs once after conception. There are also individuals who menstruate with regularity for more than one period after con- ception. Sometimes for two or three months these menstrual discharges continue. There are even cases occurring where the menstrual discharge continues through nearly the whole period of pregnancy. But the most extraordinary of all cases are those in which menstrua- tion has either appeared for the first time after conception, or in which it continued only during pregnancy. Montgomery's Signs of Pregnancy, 49 - 50. There are not wanting instances of these most singular and anomalous cases. There are some cases in which the secretion takes places, but the discharge is prevented by some obstacle. This obstacle is usu- ally an imperforate hymen. In such cases an accumulation takes place within the uterus and vagina, distending both and giving rise to several of the sympathies which usually accompany preg- ancy. Several instances of tins are stated by Montgomery. Ibid, 51-52. It may be well in this connexion to advert to one means of de- ception that may be practiced ; and that is that a female really pregnant may pretend to have her periodical discharges regu- larly and imitate the catamenia by blood. This may usually be detected from the fact that the menstrual discharge contains little or no fibrine, and does not coagulate as the blood does. Kennedy on Pregnancy and Auscultation, 1 5. Another constitutional indication which is present in the ma- jority of cases is nausea and vomiting. In some this commences almost immediately after conception. It the most frequently oc- curs between two and three weeks after, and prevails the most during the early periods of pregnancy. In some, however, it does not occur until two or three months after conception, and in others not at all. Montgomery's Signs of Pregnancy, 53. Irritability of stomach may occur from a variety of causes other than conception and pregnancy. Suppressed menstruation may give rise to it. It may be caused by many varieties oi disease. One of the principal criteria by which it is recognized PREGNANCY. 47 as a sign or indication of pregnancy is, that it is unattended by any form of disease. Its occurrence in the midst of good health, when the appetite is good, and in the early part of the day is looked upon as a sign or indication of some value. Montgome- ry's Signs of Pregnancy, 53-4 The sympathetic irritation causing nausea and vomiting some- times extends to the salivary apparatus, and produces there such an eifect as to cause a complete and copious salivation. There have been several' well authenticated instances of this, although it cannot be said to be common. It is easily distinguished from mercurial ptyalism by the absence of the peculiar fcetor of the breath, and also of sponginess and soreness of the gums. Another source of evidence from which many of the proofs of pregnancy are derived, is to be found in the mammary sym- pathies, winch consist principally of the enlargement and sensi- bility of the breasts; the formation of the areola, and the secretion of milk. These, although in themselves sensible signs, derive, nevertheless, their existence through the constitution, and should therefore, come under that class. After conception has taken place, and the menstrual discharge has been suppressed for one or two periods, a change commences in the breasts ; a sensation of throbbing is experienced, accom- panied with a sense of soreness and tingling felt about the centre and in the nipples. This sometimes does not occur until the pregnancy is considerably advanced, but usually commences when about two months of it have become completed. Mont- gomery' 's Signs of Pregnancy, 56 -7. At the same time the breasts themselves grow larger and firmer. This not unfrequently causes pain from the tension of the integu- ments. All these changes in the breast may result from causes other than conception. They may arise 1 . From marriage and the habits thence arising. 2. From becoming fat. 3. By accidental suppression of the menses, or retention by an imperforate hymen, or other causes capable of distending the uterus. Hid, 56 - 7. 4C MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCii;. The enlargement of pregnancy may, in general, be distin- guished from that which arises from becoming fat, by the fact that the breast has greater firmness, and feels knotty and un- even when pressed, and also that a corresponding fullness is not found in other parts of the body. In some irritable habits, swelling and pain in the breasts, accompany each return of the catamenia. In such cases, the tension and uneasiness disappears in two or three days, while that caused by pregnancy continues to in- crease, unless the ovum becomes blighted, when the breasts be- come flaccid, and lose their previous appearances. In females of weak and delicate constitution, less changes will occur in the breast, and those at a more advanced period of pregnancy. Neither may they be expected to be found in those who menstru- ate during the early period of pregnancy. Montgomery's Signs of Pregnancy, 57-8 ; Guy's Med. Juris., 89. It should be borne in mind, that in some individuals, the breasts are naturally much fuller than in others, and that a great- er fullness may also take place at the turn of life, when the menses are suppressed, and the person grows fatter, and the breasts frequently become full, and sometimes painful. From the fact first mentioned, one obvious inference may be derived, and that is, that it is not the absolute size of the breasts that is to be taken into consideration, but the relative size ; that is their comparative greater size than had formerly been observable in the same individual. Another indication very much relied on as affording a proof of pregnancy, is, The Areola. This is a circular disc surrounding the nipple and presents the following peculiarities : 1 . In its dimensions. Its diameter varies with different periods of pregnancy. At its first appearance, it may be about an inch in diameter. It continues to enlarge, until its greatest dimensions may exceed two inches. 2. In its color. At its first appearance, its color is, in genera] little more than a deeper shade of rose or flesh color, slightly tinged with a yellowish or light brownish hue. As pregnancy PJBEGNANCY. -19 advances, the color continues to deepen, assuming a browner and darker appearance. The intensity of the color depends much upon the complexion of the individual, being usually much dark- er in persons with black hair, dark eyes, and sallow skin, than in those of fair hair, light colored eyes, and delicate complexion. In negro women, it becomes jet black, with somewhat of a piu"- ple shade through it. The color of the areola depends on the deposition of an actual pigment between the cuticle and subja- cent skin. In some, the coloring matter is removed after delive- ry ; in others, it remains permanent. Montgomery's Signs of Pregnancy ', 60-65. It is peculiar to some young females to have the areola assume a shade of color resembling that often observed around or under the eyes ; and in women of a swarthy hue, it is sometimes found of a dark shade in the virgin state ; while in such, in a state of pregnancy, it becomes of an intensely dark, almost black, color. Mo tgomery's Signs of Pregnancy, C5 -6. Great importance has, by some, been attached to the color, but Dr. Montgomery remarks, that pregnancy may exist, and the areola remain deficient in that generally supposed to be its most important distinctive mark, viz., the color. This deficiency is not often met with, except in persons of fair skin, blue eyes, and light hair. But when the color is deficient, the other character- istic changes may be well developed. 16., 63. 3. In its raised appearance, turgescence, and glandular follicles. The surface of the areola, especially that part of it lying more immediately around the base of the nipple, exhibits a raised appearance; the integument covering it appearing turgescent, soft, and in a moist state. This may be caused by infiltration of subjacent cellular tissue. There is undoubtedly a greater de- gree of vital action going on there, than in the parts around it. lb., 59-61. One peculiarity in this raised integument is that it is studded over and rendered unequal by the prominence of glandular folli- cles, which vary in number, usually from twelve to twenty.. They project from the' sixteenth to the eighth of an inch, and are not unfrequently bedewed with a secretion sufficient to damp; 4 50 MEDICAL JURISPRTJDElfCE. and color the woman's inner dress. These follicles are sometimes wanting. Hence their absence should not be considered as con- clusive evidence that pregnancy did not exist, while their pre- sence may be received as convincing proof of previous concep- tion. There is by many, and probably with justice, more im- portance attached to the turgescence of the integument, and the presence of the follicles, than to the color ; those being considered as the principal distinctive mark, between the part during preg- nancy and at other times. Montgomery'' s Signs of Pregnancy, 59, et seq. In the centre of the colored circle is observed the nipple, par- taking also of the altered color of the part, and appearing turgid and prominent. Towards the latter period of pregnancy, espe- cially in women of dark hair and eyes, numerous round spots or small mottled patches of a whitish color are to be seen scattered over the outer part of the areola, and for about an inch or more all round, presenting an appearance as if tfie color had been dis- charged by a shower of drops falling on the part. Montgomery's Signs of Pregnancy, 81 -2. The earliest period at which these characteristics of the areola appear is at the end of the second month. At this time is ob- servable not only the alteration in color, but also the puffy tur- gescence of the nipple and its surrounding disc, together with a slight development of the little glandular follicles. From this period all these go on increasing in proportion to the progress of the pregnancy, until its full term is completed. At the end of the fourth month its changes in general become perfected or nearly so, when it exhibits the characters previously mentioned. Should the fetus become blighted in the progress of the preg- nancy, the mammary sympathies cease, and the changes in the areola decline and fade away. The follicles shrink, and no longer bedew with moisture. So also the breasts become soft and flac- cid, lose their sensibility, and cease to exhibit the enlarged con- dition of the veins. Montgomery's Signs of Pregnancy, 60-63. In regard to the conclusiveness of the areola as an indication of pregnancy, there is some difference of opinion. Dr. Mont- gomery, following the authority of Rmellie and William Hunter, PREGNANCY. 51 regards it as the result of pregnancy only. Others claim that the enlargement of the mammae, and the discoloration of the areola, are alterations brought about by several' other conditions. Various disorders of the uterine system, it is said, will produce an augmentation in the size of the breasts and a darkened areola. Guy's Med. Juris., 91. It may, perhaps, be questionable whether those who doubt its sufficiency as evidence may not have con- fined their attention more to some one of its characteristics, such as its color, than to all its distinctive features. From all the evidence offered, it is difficult to come to the conclusion, but that the true areola, when all its distinctive characteristics are present, is a very clear and satisfactory indication of pregnancy. Another usually ranked as an indication of pregnancy is — Milk in the breasts. This is popularly esteemed an infallible proof of pregnancy. It is, however, far from being really such. The secretion of milk has taken place under circumstances inde- pendent of pregnancy and even o£ intercourse. It has taken place at almost all ages, having occurred prior to puberty, and after the cessation of the generative faculty. Montgomery's Signs of Pregnancy, 69. There are even well authenticated cases on record, and some of recent occurrence, where this secretion has taken place in the breasts of men, and where they have given suck to young infants. There have been cases where women have had milk in their breasts from one pregnancy to another, and even for whole years together, although they have not nursed. Guy's Med. Juris, 92. The secretion may occur from morbid causes that are capable of distending the cavity of the uterus. The indication can really be of no great value, as milk is seldom secreted until after deli- very, and should it happen to be, during the progress of utero- gestation, it is only at so late a period of it, that much more un- exceptionable proof can be afforded from other sources than is properly derivable from this. This closes the enumeration of the constitutional signs and in- dications of pregnancy. , It will be obvious, on slight reflection, that the presence or absence of very many of these signs and in- dications, as well as the extent or degree in which they are niani 52 MEDICAL JURISPRUDEt CE. fested, will depend much upon the constitutional peculiarities, state of health, temperament, and mode of life of the individual. The other class of signs and indications embraces -those changes rendered immediately apparent by the uterine enlargement, and the appearances that are consequent thereon ; including, also, the evidence derived from auscultation. These may be termed, the uterine or sensible signs. ' These signs address themselves to three of the senses, viz., the senses of sight, touch and hearing. The eye informs us of the enlargement of the abdomen, and also of the state of the breasts, and character of the areola, al- ready considered. The touch acquaints us with the fact of preg- nancy, by external examination, through the abdominal parietes, by internal examination per vaginam, and by ballottement or re- percussion. The hearing brings to us certain sounds resulting from the state of the circulation in the gravid uterus, and the action of the fcetal heart. Montgomery's Signs of Pregnancy, 112. 1 . Ahdominal enlargement. Subsequent to conception, the ute- rus, becoming developed at its fundus, descends lower into the cavity of the pelvis ; and hence, during the first two months, the abdomen often appears unusually flat, and the umbilicus, at the same time, drawn in and depressed. These changes are in some cases so marked, that some authors place reliance upon them as proofs of pregnancy. Guy's Principles of Forensic Medicine, 93. Before the end of the third month, the abdomen becomes per- ceptibly enlarged, and this goes on increasing during the period of pregnancy, accompanied with corresponding changes in the state of the umbilicus. Montgomery's Signs of Pregnancy, 92. There are females who, from their height, or some peculiarity of form, exhibit very much less than others, this enlargement of the abdomen. In case of the death of the fcetus in utero, the progressive enlargement of the abdomen ceases, and sometimes in such cases, it will appear to diminish. Not only are there cases in which there is not a corresponding enlargement of the abdomen, but there are also others, on the other hand, where the enlargement is owing to other causes than PREGNANCY. 53 pregnancy. It may result from morbid conditions not affecting the uterus, as disease of tie liver, spleen, ovarian tumor, or ascites ; but in any such case, the length of time the enlargement has ex isted, the diseased condition of the system, the character and situation of the tumor, the state of the umbilicus and breasts, and the want of correspondence in the symptoms and conditions of the case, if it were pregnancy, will furnish sufficient indica- tions. i&., 93. They will also generally be sufficient, either alone or in con- nexion with vaginal examination, if the uterus itself be dis- tended. In case of the distension of the abdomen with fat, it will be indicated by the soft and yielding condition of the part, under the hand, taken in connexion with the absence of any solid tumor, and also of the ordinary symptoms of pregnancy. Ascites may be distinguished from pregnancy, 1 . By the fluctuation that is present and the absence of any solid tumor, 2. By the form of the abdomen when standing or lying down, which in case of pregnancy retains about the same degree of prominence, but in dropsy subsides, flattens down, and spreads out. 3. In dropsy the constitutional disturbance will increase with the increase of size, in pregnancy it will diminish. 4. In the former, there is much thirst and scanty urine, not in the latter. 5. In the former, the swelling of the feet is usually prior to that of the abdomen, in the latter subsequent. It is, however, possible that both may exist together, in which case the state of the breasts should be examined, particularly the areola, and recourse may also be had to the examination of the uterus per vaginam. Montgomery's Signs of Pregnancy, 95. There may also be morbid growths within the uterus, such as moles, hydatids, and membranes produced in dysmenorrhea, which will have the effect not only to distend the uterus, and thereby produce abdominal enlargement, but will also at the 54 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. same time give rise to many other of the usual indications of pregnancy. Guy's Principles of Forensic Med., 93. These will be more fully considered under the head of sub- stances expelled from the uterus. Another sensible sign con- nected with the enlargement of the abdomen is the State of ilve Umbilicus. During the first two 'months this is rather retracted and more depressed than usual. In the third month it becomes restored to its natural state : in the fourth, is found less hollow than before conception ; in the fifth or sixth, is nearly on a level with the surrounding integuments j in the sixth or seventh, completely so ; and towards the close of gestation pro- jects, in most persons, considerably above the surface. Any solid tumor enlarging the abdomen will also have the effect of elevat- ing the umbilicus. Montgomery's Signs of Pregnancy, 97-8. Another source of evidence of great value is that derived from Quickening and the fcetal motions. The time of quickening is rendered of great importance by the law fixing upon that as the period when the fetus in utero first becomes endowed with life We have already seen what effect the law gave to it when the mother was under judgment of condemnation for some capital crime. We shall hereafter see what a wide difference it makes in reference to injuries inflicted on a fcetus in utero, whether they were inflicted prior or subsequent to the period of quick- ening. Physiology, for the clearest reasons, denies the assumption of the law, that at the period of quickening, life is first infused into the foetus. As physiology has here the better right and the clearer reason, we shall allow it to define quickening, which it does by stating that it is the first sensation experienced by the mother of the life of the fetus in utero. Montgomery's Signs of Pregnancy, 75. This definition of quickening subjects this source of evidence to this difficulty, that it is rendered dependant on the statements of the mother. Allowing that these statements are intended to be truthful, she is very liable to be mistaken. Sometimes when the fetal motions are perceptible to the hand of another, the mother has no sensations indicating the existence PREGNANCY. 55 of such motions. There are also examples of women, as in the instance of Queen Mary, who have supposed and firmly believed that they have quickened when no such thing had occurred. In some instances festal motions, from some cause difficult to explain, become suddenly suspended, without the occurrence of any injury to the child. A strong mental emotion on the part of the mother has had this effect. Montgomery's Signs of Preg- nancy, 81. Some have supposed they felt these movements when there was no state of pregnancy existing. This naturally leads to an enquiry as to how a deception of this kind can occur, and what are the causes of it. They may arise, 1. From air in the intestines passing quickly from one part to another : 2. From the effect of nervous irritability in the female : 3. By spasmodic twitching of some of the abdominal muscles or a partial contraction of those of the uterus when distended with air or fluid : 4. From the pulsation of the great arteries, more especially when felt acting on a tumor, as in the case of an enlarged ovary. There are two singular facts connected with these deceptions. 1 . They are perceptible to the female and recognised by others. 2. At the termination of the imaginary period of gestation there has been an accession of pains strongly resembling those of labor. Montgomery's Signs of Pregnancy, 83 -4. It is asserted that some women possess the power of simulating the motions of the child by means of certain actions of the abdo- minal muscles. Instances of this kind must be very rare. One is recorded in the case of Joanna Southcott. Ibid, 84-5. Quickening has been very generally supposed to take place when the uterus rises out of the pelvic cavity into that of the abdomen. Kennedy on Pregnancy and Auscultation, 22. There is no fixed, uniform time for its occurrence. An idea is of common prevalence that it takes place exactly in the middle of gestation. This is not borne out by experience. It happens from the tenth to the twenty-fifth week, and the greater number 56 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. of cases will be found occurring between the end of tlie twelfth and sixteenth weeks after conception. Dr. Hamilton says it takes place at the end of four calendar months after conception. After quickening has occurred many of the signs and indica- tions that mark the early period of pregnancy disappear, perhaps owing to the altered position of the uterus. When pregnancy is complicated with ascites, the quickening will not occur until a later period, and will be perceived less fre- quently and less distinctly. There are also occasionally the en- tire absence of these movements through the whole period of gestation, notwithstanding the child may be born alive and healthy. These latter cases will be more likely to occur in ex- tremely sluggish and lymphatic temperaments. Montgomery's Signs of Pregnancy, 87-8. These movements may sometimes be excited by a sudden ap- plication of the hand, having been previously rendered cold by immersion in water, on to the front of the abdomen. Tins fre quently has the effect to make it start. Another method is to apply one hand against the side of the uterine tumor and, at the same time, to impress the opposite side quickly with the fingers of the other hand. At first, and during the fourth or fifth months, the movement communicates only a slight pat or throb, or merely a flutter, which sometimes is more strongly felt at particular times of the day. In the sixth and seventh months the movements are greatly increased in distinct- ness, and in the last two months they not unfrequently cause a distinct elevation of the abdominal parieties, so as to be visible through the ordinary dress of the female. Montgomery's Signs of Pregnancy, 89-90. It is necessary to bear in mind that there are two species of movements ; the one is passive, consisting in a mere change of place, and may occur whether the fcetus be living or dead. The other consists in muscular movements, and is therefore only con- sistent with life. The mother is not unfrequently deceived, mistaking the merely passive for active movements. The next subject of enquiry may properly be, 27t« state of the cs and cerinx uteri. In the virgin or unim PREGNANCY. 57 pregnated state, the os, and lower portion of the cervix, are found projecting from a quarter to half an inch into the cavity of the vagina. The part thus projecting feels firm, is conical in its form, and at its termination in the vagina has a transverse opening, whose lips or margins are firm and well defined. At conception and subsequently, all these characters change. The uterus and its appendages become not only much altered in texture but also increased in size and weight. The cervix be- comes fuller, rounder, softer and more elastic. The lips or mar- gins are tumid, softer and less distinct, the orifice feeling circular instead of transverse. These changes, however, do not become very perceptible until the third month after conception. During the three first months the os uteri is lower in the vagina, project- ing forward. When the uterus has risen from the pelvis into the abdomen, its fundus leans forward, in consequence of which the os uteri is directed backward. Its margins are now soft and relaxed, and will admit the finger to a considerable depth into the cavity of the cervix. From this period the os uteri becomes further and further removed from the external parts, so that in the latter part of gestation it is reached with difficulty. The orifice at last is hardly distinguishable, appearing like an opening in a flat surface and without any elevated margin. Montgomery's Signs of Pregnancy, 101-2. It is not pregnancy alone that will produce this change in the os and cervix uteri. The os uteri becomes somewhat similarly affected from the irritation of the uterus, caused by the near approach of menstruation. A diseased growth, such as a poly- pus or hydatids, is much more effectual in the production of this change. Although, therefore, other causes than pregnancy may be instrumental in effecting this change, yet the transverse orifice and well defined margins will always afford satisfactory evidence that the uterus is in an unimpregnated state. From the state and condition of the cervix uteri, are drawn many important indications, not only as to the fact of the ex- istence of pregnancy, but also as to its progress. During the first four months after conception, the cervix becomes fuller OS MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. rounder, softer, and more elastic ; but no particular change takes place in its form or length. In the fifth month, the cylindrical part of the cervix begins to diminish in length, a portion of it becoming a part of the body of the uterus. Thus, as pregnan- cy advances, the uterus continues to enlarge, and at the same time the cervix continues to diminish ; that diminution going on as its successive portions are taken up and become, by their expansion and enlargement, a part of the body of the uterus itself. Montgomery's Signs of Pregnancy, 104. Changes in the uterus. The uterus begins to be developed first, at its fundus. Its capacity here is increased, to enable it to receive and accommodate the ovum. It is next developed in the body, and lastly, in the cervix. During the first three months, the degree of development is hardly possible to be ascertained. In the fourth, the fundus may be felt above the anterior wall of the pelvis. In the fifth, it rises half way between the symphisis pubis and the umbilicus. In the sixth, it rises as high as the umbilicus. In the seventh, the fundus uteri may be felt half way between the umbilicus and the end of the sternum. At the end of the eighth, it has risen as high as the ensiform cartilage, and fills the whole abdomen, which is now prominent and tense, with a projection of the umbilicus. In the ninth, the uterus continues to enlarge, but the degree of its increase is not very observable. lb., 107-8. During the first four months, the uterus has the feel of a soft, firm, fleshy tumor, not sensitive, and of a smooth surface. From the fifth month, its distinctness is somewhat lost in its greater expansion ; but in the same proportion as its parieties become indistinct, its solid contents become more easily distinguishable. These changes in the uterus may be produced by any cause creating a distension of that organ. It becomes, therefore, im- portant, on this account, as well as on every other, to be able to ascertain what are the contents of the uterus, and whether its enlargement is owing to foetal development, or to some other cause. The senses of touch and hearing are those laid under contribution for the purpose of solving the problem as to the true cause of the uterine development. rKEGNA^Y. 59 During the first three months, but few indications can b« drawn from the altered state of the uterus. In the fourth month, its changes in the gravid state acquire a distinctness that gene- rally enables the practitioner to recognize them, both externally and per vaginam. Prior to examination per vaginam, the bowels and bladder should be emptied of their contents. The examina- tion is made by the index finger, having been previously im- mersed in oil ; and the object of its introduction into the vagina is mainly to ascertain the changes, if any, that have taken place in the os and cervix uteri. The female should be placed on her side, with the knees drawn up, and kept slightly apart with a pillow. Montgomery's Signs of Pregnancy, 114-116. The result of this examination will only show the uterus in a state of enlargement, which may proceed from pregnancy, hyda- tids, polypus, dropsy, accumulated menses, or a schirrhous thickening of the substance of the uterus. Ballotement, as the French term it, or repercussion, (the English term,) has been devised to ascertain whether the contents of the uterus are fce'al or not, and in practiced hands, is a means of great value. One mode of doing this, is by placing one hand on the side of the abdomen, (the female lying supine, or on her side,) and making a pressure towards the opposite side, while the ends of the fingers of the other hand impress the uterus in the con- trary direction, by means of which, the foetus may be thrown into contact with the hand, which is kept spread on the abdo- men. If the examination is made while in the supine state, or if made while the female is lying on her side, the fcetus may be felt to drop on the points of the fingers, which should be kept in close contact with the integuments. Montgomery's Signs of Pregnancy, 117. Another, which is the internal method, is performed while the female is in the upright position ; or, which is better, if placed lying with the shoulders much raised. The latter better enables an examination of the supra-pubic region. One or two of the fingers are to be introduced into the vagina, and carried forward and upward to the anterior portion of the cervix uteri, as high up as they can conveniently reach, and they must be kept in contact £0 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. with the spot to which they have been applied. The other hand must be placed on the abdomen, over the uterine tumor, which should be pressed downwards, towards the cavity of the pelvis. Immediately upon this being done, the fingers in contact with the cervix should be impressed against it with a quick and slightly jerking motion, upwards, when something will be felt to have bounded away from the fingers, upon which it will, in the course of three or four seconds, be felt to drop again, with a gentle pat, and this proceeding may sometimes be repeated as often as we please, lb., 118. This, if satisfactory, is conclusive proof of a fcetus in utero ; but it is impossible to discriminate, by means of it, a living from a dead fcetus. It is best made from the end of the fourth to the end of the sixth month. It has sometimes failed of revealing the fact of pregnancy, although it existed at the time. Care should also be taken not to mistake the movements of the uterus for those of the fcetus, and to avoid that, the fingers should be kept constantly in contact with the cervix. We now approach the consideration of another means which the ingenuity of modern times has devised, and brought to a state of comparative perfection, for discovering the uterine con- tents. In this the sense of hearing is employed, and it consists in the application of auscultation, or the use of the stethescope. This is applied for the purpose of discovering the existence or non-existence of two facts : 1 . The souffle or placental sound : 2. Tlie pulsations of the fatal heart. The first mentioned is the one which is first capable of being examined, and may be heard as soon as the uterus is sufficient- ly developed for its fundus to rise above the anterior wall of the pelvis, usually in the fourth month of gestation. Tliis is called the placental sound, from its being supposed to be con- fined to that part.of the uterus to which the placenta is attached. Montgomery's Signs of Pregnancy , 120-21. This is described as a low murmuring, or somewhat cooing sound, resembling that made by blowing gently over the lip of 3 wide-niouthed phial, and accompanied by a slight rushing noise, PREGNANCY. • 61 but without any sensation of impulse. The following peculiari- ties are to be noticed : 1. It is exactly synchronous with the pulse of the mother, varying with any variation in the maternal circulation : 2. Its situation varies not during the course of the same preg- nancy : 3. Its seat in the abdomen varies in proportion to the progres- sive advance of the pregnancy. It will be frequently heard about the fallopian tube of the right side, but may be detected in any of the lateral or anterior parts of the uterus : 4. It is liable to intermissions. The second fact i3 totally different from the first in almost all its characteristics : 1. It is heard in rapid pulsations, numbering from 120 to 160 in a minute ; and if the maternal pulse exceeds the ordinary standard, that of the foetus will remain unaffected. These pulsa- tions, are feeble and delicate, and resemble the ticking of a watch heard through one's pillow at night : 2. These pulsations are not 5< in general, heard until the end of the fifth month ; and as pregnancy advances, the sound be- comes more and more distinct : 3. The source of these pulsations being the fcetal heart, then* seat will, of course, vary with the varying position of the fcetus It is, however, the most frequently heard on one side or the other, and more frequently on the left side than on the right. This last mode of examination, if successful, is the most satis- factory of all, as it discloses not only the fact of pregnancy, but also the life of the fcetus. Montgomery- 's Signs of Pregnancy, 121-2-3. But this benefit is attended by its corresponding disadvantage, that is, if fife be extinct in the fcetus, auscultation is of not the slightest value in determining the fact of pregnancy. Also from the fact that in esse of life both these phenomena are occasionally inaudible, the medical jurist, if he finds them wanting, will not be justified in giving a negative opinion. Great nicety is required in the applicatim of auscultation. The placental sound may be imitated art'fjcially as by pressure oi 62 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. by disease. Pressing the end of the stethescope over the region of the iliac arteries, may lead to deception in regard to the teta] pulsation. The sounds sought for may sometimes be detected by the naked ear with perfect accuracy, but the use of the steihe- scope is preferable, and when used, the end of the instrument should be pressed down with a considerable degree of force, so as to displace any intermediate fluid, whether air or water, in- tervening between the ear and the source of the sound. Mont- gomery's Signs of Pregnancy, 123-4-5. Another evidence of pregnancy has been proposed, and that is a bluish tint of the vagina, extending from the os externum to the os uteri. This discoloration is said to commence as early as the fourth week in pregnancy, to increase till the delivery and to leave only with the lochia. It is described as being a violet color, or like lees of wine and very distinct. This must be caused by the increased vascularity of the genital system consequent upon conception, and hence causes, other than pregnancy, that produce congestion of that system must produce these same, appearances. The purple hue of the mucous membrane of the vagina has been perceived at the time of menstruation. Should, however, pregnancy be found to be invariably attended by this appearance, it would be an in- valuable indication as it is found at so early a period of gestation. Montgomery'' s Signs of Pregnancy, 126-7-8. The knowledge which it is incumbent on the medical jurist to possess on the subject of pregnancy, is by no means complete without including as a part of it, the examination of substances that, under certain conditions of the uterine system, may be ex- pelled from the uterus. These substances are four in number. 1. An early ovum. 2. A mole. 3. Uterine hydatids, and 4. False membranes. When any thing is expelled from the uterus, the proper subjects of enquiry are two in number, viz : Is the substance fetal in its character, and if not, is it the result of conception or not 1 The main fact to be arrived at is, has there been a conception and state of pregnancy 1 1 Jin early ovum. A product of conception expelled within PREGNANCY. 63 the first month cannot be recognized. If expelled soon after the expiration of that time, it will hardly be recognized except by one acquainted with it, and who will take sufficient time to examine it. When thus expelled it is generally infiltrated with co-agulated blood, and requires to be immersed in water for a day or more, when, by agitation and washing, the coagulated blood must be removed, while with delicate blunt instruments the examiner gently separates the component parts of the mass under water, until its real character may be ascertained. This may require three or four days or even a week. If the examiner fail to dis- cover constituent portions of the foetus in this early period of its development, he may be able to identify the ovum by its mem- branes. Thus it may be covered with the decidua, characterized Dy its soft, rich, pulpy appearance and strong red color, with its rough external surface perforated by small foramina and its in- ternal surface smooth, covering, either partially or completely, the substance under examination. Within this may be found the inner decidua, with its smooth outer surface, and its internal one covered with filaments which receive the arborescent villi from the surface of the chorion. Guy's Med. Juris. , 102-3. These are appearances that characterise the ovum, and are never ex- hibited as the product of disease or of morbid growth. They are, therefore, to be taken as evidence of the fact of pregnancy. 2. Moles. There is considerable difference of opinion as to what constitutes a mole, and about equally as great, whether it is the result of conception, or an accidental formation of a mor- bid character. The latter question depends very much or en- tirely on the former. According to the most popular opinion, every coagulum of blood which continues long enough in the uterus to assume its form, and to retain only the fibrous part, is denominated a mole. This definition would cover many cases that may exist independent of conception. But in regard to the solid fleshy masses that are occasionally expelled from the uterus, and are more properly termed moles, there is great doubt whether they ever exist except as the result of sexual intercourse. Mont- gomery's Signs of Pregnancy, 134, et seq. The safer rule seems to be that suggested bj Dr. Montg miery 64 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. that it would not be justifiable to pronounce any such mass ex- pelled from the uterus a proof of pregnancy, unless there can be detected in it either a foetus or some part of it, or some other of the component structures of the ovum ; and even then it might be possible that the placentula might have formerly remained in the uterus in an abortion not much noticed at the time, and thus have given rise to this fleshy structure. Portions of placenta appear at times to be long retained in utero, from which they are afterwards expelled in the form of moles, when the women were advanced in life or many years widows. 3. Uterine hydatids. In regard to these also, there exists much contrariety of opinion, some supposing them not necessarily the result of conception, while others consider them as the product of disease attacking the ovum. The existence of hydatids in utero is always accompanied by the ordinary symptoms of preg- nancy. The balance of authority is very clearly on the side that uterine hydatids do not occur except after sexual intercourse, and as a consequence of impregnation. Still there should be some doubt in pronouncing, unless some constituent part of the ovum can be detected along with them, or in case of an exami- nation after death a true corpus luteum be found in the ovary. It may, however, occur that a female miscarrying in the third or fourth month of pregnancy, the placenta or some portion of the ovum is retained, and long afterwards gives rise to the pro- duction of hydatids. These may be retained for many months, and when they come to be expelled give rise to many unjust sus- picions. The length of time during which they are retained in utero before expulsion has been variously stated. In many cases they are not retained longer than seven months. But in many others they have been expelled at ten, eleven, twelve and a half, and fourteen months after conception. It also seems that they may be retained in utero many years. They sometimes are found accompanying an otherwise healthy preg nancy. In one remarkable instance a lady four or five months pregnant expelled a quantity of uterine hydatids, and subsequent PREGNANCY. 65 ly, at the proper time, gave birth to the celebrated Beclard. Montgomery's Signs of Pregnancy, 138. 4. False membranes or those expelled in dysmenorrhea. In dys- menorrhcea the female may have pains resembling those of labor, accompanied by red discharge, and followed by the expulsion of a substance somewhat resembling the decidual covering of an ovum. In these cases, however, the symptoms of pregnancy are not observed, and the occurrences are often habitual with the person at every menstrual period. The substance expelled will be found deficient in many of the characters of the true decidua. It is a morbid product, and is not furnished with a structure such as would only be required for the performance of the office of furnishing nutrition to the ovum. The balance of authority is here very clearly on the side that the production of these membranes is referable entirely to causes independent of inter- course, and they are not therefore the results of conception. It may sometimes become necessary to examine the uterus and its appendages after death, with the view of determining the ex- istence or previous occurrence of pregnancy. ■ The first thing that will naturally occur to the examiner in regard to the uterus will be to observe its size and vascularity. If found of its ordi- nary diminutive size it is clearly in a virgin state. If enlarged and vascular, its contents should be carefully examined. If the ovum be detected, or any of its component structures, or any clear and well defined portions of a foetus, no doubt can remain but that pregnancy was present. But the uterus may be found enlarged and empty, exhibiting increased vascularity, and several of the changes which accom- pany gestation. Its contents may have been expelled, and the appearances remaining, together with the structural changes that may be present, may be insufficient to enable the examiner to arrive at any clear conclusion as to the fact of pregnancy. We may not be able to derive from the uterus itself a satisfactory answer to the enquiry. But what it fails to furnish may, per- haps, be derived from its appendages. Montgomery's Signs of Pregnancy, 213-14. The appendage of most value, and to which reference should 5 66 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. be had in all such cases, is the ovary ; and the attention should be directed to that part of it, if it exist, called the, corpus glandu- losum or corpus luteum. Amid the uncertainties that so con- stantly attend organic phenomena, especially those connected with the mysterious processes of generation, it is truly delight- ful to find any one thing that is fixed, certain, and reliable. It is claimed, that the true corpus luteum is an infallible evidence of conception, and the want of it within certain limits of time, as reliable evidence that there has been no conception. It is true, the medical profession are not all united as to the conclusiveness of this evidence. The whole subject is very thoroughly consider- ed, and the authorities making for and against it, are very ably reviewed in Dr. Montgomery's work on the signs of pregnancy ; and the conclusion he arrives at, from all the authorities, and from his own very extended experience, is to affirm the truth of both of Haller's propositions, viz., the one, that conception never happens without the production of a corpus luteum ; and the other, that the corpus luteum is never found in virgin animals, but is the effect of impregnation. Montgomery's Signs of Pregnancy, 244. If this be so, as the strong balance of authority seems to have very satisfactorily settled, it is of the highest importance that the phenomena attending the corpus luteum should be thorough- ly understood. The corpus luteum is the place or spot in the ovarium from whence the impregnated ovum has proceeded. The ovum is found, originally, contained in the graafian vesicle, and is sur- rounded by two membraneous envelopes, the outer one of which is the stronger, and gives transmission to several blood vessels, passing to the inner, which is softer and more vascular. Immediately upon conception, there is a determination of blood to the ovary and vesicle, the coats of which become per- vaded by a very fine net-work of vessels. The consequence is, that the vesicle itself increases in size, and becomes a kind of temporary uterus, performing an office analogous to that which is afterwards discharged by the uterine decidua, and subsequent- ly still, by the placenta. The ovum is discharged by the burst- ing of the coats of the vesicle. FKEGNANCY. 67 After the escape of the ovum, there is a cicatrix, or appear- ance as of a rent imperfectly united. The peritoneal coat around it appears abraded, and a twining of the vessels there is distinct- ly observable. In the centre, there is a cavity filled with coagu- lated blood, and surrounded by a yellowish organised substance. The peculiar appearances that mark the corpus luteum are more distinctly observable in the earlier periods of pregnancy. The central cavity is then much more apparent, and there are stronger evidences of vascularity and vital action. The true corpus luteum is distinguishable, 1. By its color. That is a dull yellow somewhat similar in appearance to the buffy coat of the blood : 2. By its form. That is oval or fabiform : 3. By its size. This depends on the size of the Graafian vesicle ; upon the rapid or retarded closure of the central cavity ; and upon the degree of vascular activity existing at the time. It is , largest during the earlier periods of pregnancy, gradually dimin- ishing afterwards, slowly during gestation, more quickly after delivery. Its size will be found to be in the inverse proportion to the time elapsed after conception. It usually occupies from one-fourth to one-half the area of the ovary. At the end of two months it has been found to measure in length 9 J lines, in breadth 8 lines, the central cavity being three lines by two, and the ave- rage thickness of the glandular structure from 3 to 3^ lines. In the sixth month the longer axis was 6 fines, the shorter 5, the thickness 3, and the central cavity 2 by 1. In the ninth month the longer axis was 5 or 6, and the shorter 4 or 5 : 4. By its structure. This is glandular, presenting a lobulated appearance. Slight convolutions are traceable like a section of a kidney, or that part of the brain called the centrum ovale : 5. By its vascularity. The vessels run from the circumference to the centre. If the spermatic vessels going to the ovary be - injected, the vessels of the corpus luteum will be filled with color- ing matter : 6. By the appearances presented at its centre. These are either a cavity or a white line. Up to the end of the fourth month, and sometimes later, is to be found the cavity. It ha? nevr 68 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. been found open after the sixth month. The white line is formed by the closure of the inner coat of the vesicle. After the termination of the period of gestation, or of the ex- pulsion of the contents of the uterus, the corpus luteum begins to alter in its character, until it is no longer found in the ovary. The exact time of its disappearance is unknown, but it has not been found later than the end of five months after delivery. It has been supposed by many that the corpora lutea are per- manent, and that their number indicate the number of concep- tions. This is an error. Their number is always the same as that of the fcetuses lodged in utero in one gestation. There may sometimes be found a greater number of corpora lutea than of foetuses born. In such cases one or more to make up the num- ber are aborted. There may be a smaller number of corpora lutea than of fcetuses born, as a single vesicle is sometimes found to contain two ovula. There may, therefore, be twins with but one corpus luteum. The birth of a child is not necessarily inferrible from the fact of finding a corpus luteum. The only necessary inference is that conception has taken place. But the ovum may have been blighted or destroyed, or converted into a mole or hydatids. A cicatrix on the surface of the ovary must not be mistaken for a corpus luteum, such may occur as the result of inflamma- tion or of small abscesses. - The difference of opinion among members of the profession, in regard to the conclusive character of the evidence furnished by the presence of the corpus luteum, has probably originated from the fact that there are sometimes appearances resembling corpora lutea, which have, nevertheless, no other real affinity with the true ones than a similarity in color. These spurious or false cor- pora lutea are supposed to be formed by an accidental or morbid determination of fluids towards a vesicle, by which it becomes distended with fluid, and sometimes bursts and discharges its contents, in which event an external cicatrix is found. Sometimes instead of bursting and discharging, the fluid is ab- sorbed. In either case, there is often found deposited on the in- ner surface of the vesicle, a substance resembling the true cor- PREGNANCY. 69 pus luteum in color, not more than one sixteenth of an inch thick, much smaller than the real ones, and lacking all their es- sential characteristics, with the single exception of color. The following are the principal points of difference between them. The spurious ones differ from the real ones in that. 1 . There is no prominence or enlargement of the ovary over them: 2. The external cicatrix is almost always wanting : 3. There are often several of them found in both ovaries : 4. There is no trace of vessels to be found in their substance, and hence there is no possibility of injection : 5. The texture is infirm, never presenting the soft, rich, lobu- lated, glandular appearance of the true corpora lutea : 6. In form, they are often triangular, or square, or some figure bounded by straight lines. 7. They never present the central cavity, or the radiated stel- liform white line, which is the 'result of its closure. These several points of difference will enable one to distinguish the spurious from the true, without the danger of confounding them together. In regard to the formation of the false corpora lutea, Dr. Pa- terson remarks, that they may arise— 1. From the bursting and subsequent filling of a vesicle with blood, as in menstruation : 2. From partial effusion of blood into a vesicle, either with or without rupture of it : 3. By re-absorption of the fluid of a morbidly enlarged graafian vesicle, giving rise to a puckered cyst : 4. From effusion of blood into the tissue of the ovary, the apoplexy of the organ : 5. From tubercular deposits , and, 6. From cysts filled with yellow, fatty matter. Guy's Princi- ples of Forensic Medicine, 106. / On the trial of Angus, reported in 1 Beck, 219, et. seq., it was important, under one count in the indictment, to make out the fact of recent pregnancy. There was much conflict of opinion 70 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. in relation to it ; but the discovery of a corpus luteum was. deemed siinicient to settle the question in its favor. It remains to consider some questions of a medico-legal charac- ter, that may arise for investigation. Of these, we shall notice, 1 . The age, or period in the life of the female, within which conception may occur. The limits of the generative faculty in women, are generally those of the function of menstruation. This differs in different climates. Guy, 106. In warmer climates, it occurs earlier than in colder. Dr. Montgomery, speaking in reference to the British climate, assigns as their limits the fifteenth and forty-fifth year. Montgo- mery's Signs of Pregnancy, 160. Dr. Beck says, that in our climate, a female, not previously barren, cannot, in general, be impregnated under thirteen years of age, nor beyond fifty. 1 Beck's Med. Juris., 182. In Abyssinia and Bengal, mothers are found of the age of eleven years. Whatever may be assigned as the general rule, on this subject, it is obvious it can never be received except as sub- ject to many exceptions. These exceptions apply to both the limits of this term. About the ytar 1828, a lady was to be seen at the Ballston Springs, who was a grandmother at not quite the age of twenty- eight years. In the Transylvania Journal, vol. 7, 447, is recorded a case of menstruation at one year, and of pregnancy at nine. On the other hand, pregnancy seldom takes place beyond fifty ; but instances of a very extraordinary nature have been noticed, in whieh it has been found to occur considerably beyond that period, in women who had formerly borne children. Instances are cited from Capuron and others, by Dr. Montgomery, in which pregnancy occurred at the age of 60. lb., 165. A case is mentioned in the Boston Medical and Surgical Jour-'' nal, of a woman at Whitehall, (New-York,) becoming a mother at 64. Guy's Principles of Forensic Medicine, 99. From a great number of cases that have been collected, the age of fifty-four has been fixed upon as the probable limit of fruitfulness ; although no one can deny the possibility of its being extended beyond that period, lb., 100 PREGNANCY. 71 In a recent case argued and decided in the English Coiut of Chancery, a large amount of property hung upon the single issue whether a woman might have a child at sixty years of age. The attorney general challenged the production of a single well re- corded instance of a woman's having a child at that age. No such instance was produced, and he succeeded. Montgomery's Signs of Pregnancy, 165-6. There sometimes occurs what has been called a spurious preg- nancy, which should be understood, in order to be able to discri- minate between it and a real one. This is often observed about the turn of life, when the menses become irregular, being not unfrequently suppressed for a few periods prior to their final cessation. The stomach, at the same time, is generally out of order, nausea and vomiting experienced, the breasts enlarge, and often become sensible, and even slightly painful. Sometimes a serous or sero 7 lactescent fluid exudes from the nipples and orifices of the areolar tubercles. The abdomen, at the same time, grows fuller and more prominent ; the enlargement progressively increasing, owing, in part, to a deposition of fat in the integu- ments and in the omentum ; but more, still, to a distension of the intestines, by flatus, which, passing from one part to another, communicates a sensation like that produced by the motions of the foetus. AH this is frequently accompanied with a disturbed state of the nervous system, the woman herself being firmly convinced of her pregnancy. As if to render the delusion com- plete, at the end of the supposed gestation, periodical pains fre quently occur, strongly resembling those of labor. Although this generally takes place at the turn of life, yet it is not confined to that period, but has also been met with in young women, and those who had borne children both before and after- wards. Several instances of this are given by Dr. Montgomery, in his Signs and Symptoms of Pregnancy, pages 170-71, &c. These phenomena are not even confined to the human species, but have been observed in the lower animals, particularly in the dog species. It cannot, therefore, be attributable to the imagina- tion. In cases of this kind, and where it becomes necessary to dis- 72 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. criminate, little reliance can be placed upon most of what we have termed the constitutional signs and indications of pregnan- cy. We are to trust, principally, to a careful manual examina- tion, by which the abdomen, however enlarged, is found to be soft, puffy, and compressible ; the umbilicus sunk ; no abdomi- nal tumor ; and the uterus, when examined per . vaginam, i9 found unaltered. It is sometimes the fact, that pregnancy is found complicated with disease, in such a manner, that much difficulty is experi- enced in determining its existence. This is more particularly the case with those diseases that increase the size of the abdo- men, especially dropsy. The difficulty in deciding, is greater in those cases where the dropsy existed previous to impregnation ; because, in such a case, the system is so disturbed before concep- tion, that the natural sympathies and changes which should fol- low that occurrence, are either prevented from taking place, or are so imperfectly manifested, or actually disguised, by the pre- existing disease, that they are incapable of being recognized. In the majority of cases, however, it supervenes on pregnancy, when its usual indications are more marked, and less doubt and difficulty is realized in forming a conclusion. Other cases may present themselves, of an embarrassing char- acter, where the uterus contains morbid growths; such as hyda- tids, and moles. In those cases of pregnancy in which hydatids, or a mole, are formed, many, or most, of its usual signs are generally present, accompanied with irregular uterine discharges, and a distended uterus ; but its contents are not disclosed to us until some of the hydatids, or a mole, are discharged. There are, it is true, several points of discrimination, but they all occasion- ally fail. In many instances of hydatids, the uterus has been observed to acquire, quickly, a size quite disproportionate to the period of pregnancy, and to be at the same time much softer than usual ; but both these circumstances are subject to great variety. Occasionally, also, in the case of hydatids, there is the discharge from the uterus, of an almost colorless watery fluid. Montgomery's Signs of Pregnancy, 180-81. The only rule that Dr. Montgomery thinks can be laid down PREGNANCY. 73 " with safety, is, " that if the woman, after experiencing the ordi- nary symptoms of pregnancy up to the third or fourth month, is observed to be growing large with unusual rapidity, so that her s&e corresponds to a period much more advanced than her preg- nancy really is, or is supposed to be, and she then becomes affect- ed with irregular discharges from the vagina, sometimes of blood and at other times of water, and, although perhaps the sixth or seventh month has arrived, no motion of a fcatus has been per- ceived by her, nor can it be felt by any mode of manual exami- nation, or re-percussion, but the uterus is ascertained to be dis- tended, and feels as if it were Med with something of a gela- tinous consistence, the case is likely to prove, eventually, one of hydatids. But if, in conjunction with the same combination of collateral symptoms, the uterus be found of unusually firm consistence, irregular in form, and painfully sensitive, the case will probably terminate in the expulsion of a solid, or fleshy mole ; but that these can only be received as general rules, liable to very nume- rous exceptious." Montgomery's Signs of Pregnancy, 181-2. Another disturbing element, is the formation of tumors, par- ticularly of the hard, fibrous kind, which, if they happen to be large or numerous, very much complicate the condition of preg- nancy, and greatly disguise its result. In such cases, a manual examination may detect the fcetal motions, or auscultation may reveal the true nature of the case. All the usual signs and indications of pregnancy must be par- ticularly noticed, especially the mammary changes, and the areola. 2. A second medico-legal question is, can a woman conceive while in a state of unconsciousness 1 This question was formerly considered while on the subject of rape, and any further discus- sion of it here is deemed unnecessary. From the instances that have actually occurred, it may now be considered as well settled, that with married women, or those accustomed to sexual inter- course, it is possible to have such a connection as shall lead to a fruitful result, while they are in a state of unconsciousness, pro- duced by deep sleep or the action of narcotics upon the system. This effectually disposes of the ancient doctrine, that consent and 74 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. pleasurable sensation on the part of the woman, are conditions necessary to conception. It also goes to show further that con- ception, when the physical conditions under which it takes place are complied with, is a result entirely independent of the volitions of the sexes : 3. A third medico-legal question is, can a woman remain igno- rant of her pregnancy up to the time of delivery 1 Three classes of cases may here be presented. The first will include all those cases where conception occurred without consciousness, and where of course all the symptoms of pregnancy will be likely to be attributed to any cause but the true one. The second class includes those where the female has yielded to the solicitations of the male in consequence of solemn assu- rances that, under certain circumstances, connexion may take place without danger ; as in the case of the female who yielded to the solicitations of her seducer in a bath, under solemn assu- rances from him, that, under those circumstances, no conception could take place. In this class there is more or less weakness of intellect. There would be the same tendency as in the other to refer the symptoms of pregnancy to some other cause than the true one. In the third class are included all those who are conscious of having been exposed, and are laboring under no delusion in reference to any supposed exemption from the probable results of the exposure. Those of the first and second class may be very likely to refer any changes they experience to a state of disease, and thus re- main honestly ignorant of their real condition up to nearly or quite the time of their delivery. Those of the third class may by possibility persuade themselves that the changes are the re- sults of disease, but their consciousness of exposure must cer- tainly give rise to many misgivings in their own minds on the subject. A very interesting trial took place in Monroe county, New- York, in 1842, in which the facts as alleged were that Miss Sophia Murdock, a young lady of fifteen years of age, had a single con- uexion with a clergyman, in his study, in his own house, in the PKEGNANCY. 75 daytime. She had no connexion with any other, and never di- vulged it until concealment was no longer possible. The ques- tions raised were — 1. Whether it was possible to have complete connexion with a young virgin on the first attempt, and whether a first and sole connexion could result in impregnation 1 2. Whether in such case it would not always be attended with pain, and the usual signs of forcible deflorescense 1 3. Whether a woman could be unconscious of her pregnancy until within five or six weeks of the usual period of gestation, and whether two hundred and ninety-two days intervening be- tween the alleged intercourse and birth of the child, would ren- der an impregnation, at that period, improbable 1 There was considerable contrariety of medical testimony upon these points. Dr. J. W. Francis stated that both the facts em- braced in the first question were possible. That the second was among the possibilities, but was improbable. In regard to the third, that it was not probable that a woman conceiving for the first time should remain thus unconscious, nor that she should go beyond the nine months, the usual period, as first pregnancies more commonly fell short of it. A number of other physicians concurred in stating that there were variations of time in the period of pregnancy, the first, how- ever, being more likely to fall short than to exceed the ordinary time, viz., two hundred and eighty days. That they were aware of no physical impediments that should preclude conception from following the first coition, although the probabilities were against it. That they knew of no reason why conception might not follow when the connexion was forcible, as the mind, in their opinion, had nothing to do with the matter. The result was the conviction of the defendant, although an ecclesiastical court subsequently, and after a very full investiga- tion, pronounced a judgment of not guilty. There is little doubt but that there are many instances occur- ring, both in the virgin and the married state, in which concep- tion has resulted from a single act of intercourse. So also from the well known fact, that, in some instances, the motions of the 76 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. fcetus in utero are never perceived by the mother, and that the ordinary symptoms of pregnancy vary very much in different individual cases, being sometimes many of them obscured, and some not appearing at all ; it may be readily supposed that there may be cases where the female will remain ignorant up to a very late period of gestation. Guy's Principles of Forensic Medicine, %\,et seq. 4. A fourth medico-legal question relates to the possibility of superfoztation. This is denned as the conception of a second embryo during the gestation of the first, the products of the two distinct conceptions being born either at the same or at different times. This question has a bearing upon legitimacy, and in that view only becomes important to be considered in medical juris- prudence. Upon the possibility of this the medical profession are not probably as much divided in opinion as they once have been. The ancient physiologists were very generally believers in it. In modern times much scepticism is entertained in rela- tion to it. Those who doubt, or deny it, urge as reasons, 1 . That shortly after conception the os tincse, as also the inter- nal apertures of the fallopian tubes, are closed by a thick tena- cious mucus : 2. That the deciduan membrane, which is formed soon after conception, lines the uterus, and aids in obliterating the openings into its cavity : 3. That when the uterus is impregnated, the fallopian tubes, instead of running horizontally to the ovaria, lie parallel to the sides, so that if a second embryo were formed within the ovari- um, the tubes could not embrace it in order to convey it to the uterus : 4. The arrival of a new embryo in the uterus, would prove destructive to the first, inasmuch as the functions which have already been performed for the first conception, would have to be repeated, and an additional decidua and placenta would have to be formed. To the first two objections it is answered that neither the mu- cus, nor the decidua, adhere so firmly to the orifices and cells of PREGNANCY. 77 the uterus, as to exclude the passage of the aura seminis, or even the semen itself. That the tact of the occasional occurrence of the menstrual discharge during pregnancy proves this. To the third objection it is answered that although this obstacle may- exist in the fully developed uterus, yet that in the early stage of utero-gestation the ovary and fallopian tubes are not in the least prevented from coming into contact with each other, and that it is only during that early stage that superfcotation is alleged to take place. The answer to the fourth objection is, that it is founded too much on assumption alone to require any particular reply. Guy's Principles of Forensic Medicine, 113 - 14. In the alleged cases of superfcetation that have, at different times occurred, reference may be made to 1 Beck's Med. Juris., 194, et seq. One case occurred in Charleston, South Carolina, in 1714, and was that of a negro woman who was delivered of twins within a very short time, the one of which was found to be black, and the other white. This led to an investigation, in which it turned out, that she had been compelled, by threats, to suffer the em- braces of a black man immediately after her husband had left her bed. A case very similar to this occurred in Jamaica, where a negro woman brought forth two children at a birth, nearly of a size, the one being a negro and the other a mulatto. This, on investigation, had the same explanation as the other. These and all others of a like character, are obviously not cases of su- perfcetation, but simply of twins. There is also another class of cases where the birth of two children is separated by a short interval, or by an interval cor- responding to their respective size and degree of development, so that the fact that their conception took place about the same time, is by no means excluded. Such, for instance, is the fol- lowing. Eight months after the husband's death, the widow was deli- vered of a deformed child, which did not survive its birth. One month and a day thereafter she was delivered of a perfect living child. The husband's relations contested its legitimacy, on the 78 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. ground that it was the result of superfcetation, and Zacchias was consulted. He decided it to be a case of superfcetation, and supposed that the first was the product of a superfcetation, and conceived a month after the other. There seems little reason for this con- clusion. The most reasonable explanation of this would seem to be, that it was a case of twins conceived at the same time, but of which one was discharged before the other. Guy's Principles of Forensic Medicine, 110-11. Very many of the cases recorded as instances of superfcetation belong to the last mentioned class of cases. In cases of twins the growth of one, may, from some cause or other, happen to be retarded, while that of the other proceeds at the usual rate of development. There is still another class of cases more difficult of explana- tion. Of these, the following is an instance. A woman in Lyons married at 22, became pregnant five years thereafter, but had an abortion at the 7th month, and on the 20th May, 1779. She conceived within one month thereafter, and on the 20th January, 1780, eight months after her delivery, and seven months from her second conception, she brought forth a living child. Her delivery at this time was not accompanied with the usual symptoms. No milk appeared. The lochia were wanting, and the abdomen did not diminish in size. An examination was had, when it was declared by Dr. Desgranges that she had a se- cond child in the womb. Three weeks after this delivery, she quickened, and on the 6th July, 1780, five months and sixteen days after the first birth, she was again delivered of another living daughter. The milk now appeared, and she was enabled to nurse. Guy's Principles of Forensic Med. 111-12; 1 Beck's Med. Juris. 196-7. There is also another well authenticated case in which t\\ o male children,- both born perfect, were brought forth at an inter- val of nearly three calendar months. There are also other cases to be found in writers on Medical Jurisprudence. The clearest instance is probably that of the woman of Lyons. The instances LEGITIMACY. 7 9 are possessed of little value as proving superfcetation, unless the interval between the births is considerable. If the interval be small, it may be accounted for by the difference in maturity be- tween the children. In the instances recorded there has not perhaps been a sufficient amount of observation made upon the size or the mature and immature condition of the children born. The products of the conception may differ greatly in size and yet both be healthy children. As an explanation of those cases that seem the most strongly to make out superfcetation, like that of the woman of Lyons, it is urged that there are occasional cases of double uteri, and that this peculiarity of formation probably existed in those remarka- ble cases. There are many instances of the occurrence of these double uteri. A long enumeration of them may be found in 1 Beefs Med. Juris. 199-200. They are more numerous than the instances that have been recorded of superfcetation. In some of them, not only were found double uteri, but also double vagi- nee. There is one recorded instance in which superfcetation ac- tually occurred where, on examination, the uterus and vagina were both found double, each vagina having a separate orifice. Other cases may have depended on the same malformation. Amid the doubt aud uncertainty that now rests on the subject, the conclusion arrived at by Dr. Beck is probably the safest, viz : that should this doctrine arise in medico-legal cases, we must be guided by the laws of legitimacy, both as to premature and protracted births. The latest born should fall within the legal term, or be excluded from the privileges attendant on it. 1 Beck's Med. Juris. 201-2. V. LEGITIMACY. Under this head often arise questions of both a difficult and delicate nature. The law of England, and of this country, re- gards the illegitimate as nullius fillius, as possessing no inheri- table blood, and as utterly excluded from any participation either in ancestral honors or property. This wide difference which the 80 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. law creates between the legitimate and the illegitimate, invests all questions of legitimacy with a high degree of interest. The general rule of the law is, that all children born in lawful wedlock are legitimate. The law, it will be noticed, regards the birth, not the conception, as the test of legitimacy. Again the legal presumption is that the husband always has access to the wife, so as to render him the father of any child born in wedlock. This, however, like any other presumption, may be rebutted by proof; and hence in contested questions of legitimacy, it is competent to prove impossibility of access on the part of the husband ; or the fact of impotence ; or any phy- sical defect going to show that the act of intercourse was impos- sible. There is one case in which the law inclines particularly to favor offspring on the score of legitimacy. The rule as laid down by Blackstone and Coke is — that if a man dies, and his widow soon after marries again, and a child is born within such a time as that, by the course of nature, it might have been the child of either husband, in that case, he is said to be more than ordinarily legitimate, for he may, when he arrives at years of discretion, choose which of the fathers he pleases. There are several occasions where this question will arise ; as where a wife gives birth to a child more than nine calendar months after the absence or death of her husband. The point here to be settled is whether the period of utero-gestation can be so extended beyond the usual time, as to render this the child of the absent or deceased husband. So again a woman at an unusually short period after her marriage may give birth to a child, when the question may arise as to how short a period of utero-gestation a child may be born, possessed of sufficient power to be reared to maturity. Again, it may become necessary, if a child is born in the seventh or eighth month after marriage, and presents the appearance of a child having gone the full term, to examine carefully its state of growth and maturity, in order to draw a conclusion as to what has been the actual period of utero-gestation LEGITIMACY. 81 The most important question involved in the consideration of this subject is the duration of pregnancy. This has what is term- ed its usual period, which is nine calendar months, ten lunar months, forty weeks, or two hundred and eighty days. There is, however, a difference between nine calendar months on the one hand, and ten lunar months, forty weeks, or two hundred and eighty days on the other ; as the nine calendar months ma^ consist either of two hundred and seventy-three, two hundred and seventy-four, two hundred and seventy-five or two hundred and seventy-six days, thus falling short a few days of the two hundred and eighty. Blackstone says — from what has been said it appears, that all children born before matrimony a^re bastards by law ; and so it is of all children born so long after the death of the husband, that by the the usual course of gestation they could not be begot- ten by him. But this being a matter of uncertainty, the law is not exact as to a few days. 1 Blackstone' 's Com. 456. This leaves it as a question of fact to be settled in each con- tested case by medical testimony. In the settlement of this question, one of the limits of this period is clearly ascertainable, viz : that of the birth of the child. The other, that of its con- ception, is, in most cases, involved in a very considerable degree of doubt. There are commonly reckoned four means of ascertaining the time of conception. These are, 1 . Peculiar sensations experienced by the mother : 2. Cessation of the menstrual discharge : 3. The period of quickening : 4. A single coitus. No dependence can be placed on the first, for the reasons, that . these sensations are not defined, so that those conceiving for the first time could recognize them. They are not constant in their occurrence in the same female, and they do not take place at any particular time. Guy's Principles of Forensic Medicine, 200. The second means mentioned is undoubtedly the most relied upon ; but to this there are great objections. Their irregularity in many respects was noticed while on the subject of pregnancy. 82 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. At best, there is an interval occurring between the menstrual discharges, of nearly twenty-eight days, on any one of whicfy conception may take place. This shows that although the sup- pression may be evidence of the fact, yet only an approximative result can be arrived at. The time generally assumed, is the middle point of time between the last discharge and the time when it would have again recurred had not pregnancy super- vened. Some calculate from the first week after the cessation. As to the third means, the period of quickening, that is much more variable than the one last mentioned. According to the best authorities, it has a range of six weeks, and according to others, of sixteen ; so that it could be very little relied upon as a basis for calculation. The fourth, a single coitus, presents, really, the only sure basis of calculation. This, however, must be of very unfrequent occurrence. Dr. Guy has collected seven cases, in all which, the average was found to be two hundred and eighty-four or twu hundred and eighty-five days ; the minimum, two hundred and seventy-three, or two hundred and seventy-six ; the maximum, two hundred and ninety-two or two hundred and ninety-three, The range was found to be sixteen, seventeen, nineteen or twen- ty days. The excess over two hundred and eighty was twelve or thirteen days. Guy's Principles of Forensic Medicine, 201. From these few facts, it may be easily collected, that there is no fixed period of utero-gestation, but that all is subject to a greater or less degree of variation. This receives strong addi- tional confirmation from the facts collected, and observations made, by M. Tessier and Lord Spencer, in reference to the period of gestation among animals. These were principally made in reference to the cow and horse, and the results arrived at show- ed that there is much more variation in both these, in the period of utero-gestation, than has ever been noticed in the human species. IJ:,.202-3. It furnishes, also, a very good reason why we should expect to find the period of utero-gestation a variable period, that all the functions of the human body, that have been carefully ex- amined, such as the pulse, the respiration, the secretion of urine, LEGITIMACY. 83 the cutting of teeth, &c, are all variable, and sometimes vary within wide limits. It is also a fact, that those who advocate a fixed period, are unable to agree among themselves as to what that period shall be. Although they all agree that it is fixed, yet each names a different period of time, varying from thirty-seven to forty weeks. Guy's Principles of Forensic Medicine, 203 -4. Premature Birth. Suspicions are sometimes entertained that the period of birth, and the development of the foetus, do not correspond to the period which ought to have been that of gestation, dating from the time of the marriage, or the return of the husband after a long absence. Some have considered this as embracing the question of viability, or the earliest period of time at which it could be born and reared up. But this question does not appear to arise here. It is the comparison between the state of the in- fant at birth, as to its maturity or immaturity, and the alleged period of gestation, that is here presented to the medical jurist, and upon which his conclusion is to be founded. There are some women to whom it is peculiar, always to have tie time of delivery anticipated by two or three weeks, so that they never go beyond the end of the thirty-seventh or thirty- eighth week, for several pregnancies in succession. Montgomery's Signs of Pregnancy, 264. This should be borne in mind, as also the further fact that great variety is constantly observable in the size, weight, strength and appearance of children at the full time. Most of them weigh from six to seven pounds, while occasionally we meet with instances where they are double that weight. This should induce a caution in determining, especially where the period has advanced to within a month of its usual termination. The indi- cations of maturity and immaturity will be considered under the head of delivery. In 1838, occurred the case of the Rev. Fergus Jardine, before the Scotch Presbytery, which arose upon a charge made against Mr. Jardine, for having committed fornication with his wife be- 84 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. fore marriage. He was married on the 3d of March, 1835, and on the 24th of August following, Mrs. Jardine was delivered of a girl. This, reckoning from the day of marriage, was only 174 days, or fire calendar months and twenty-one days over. The infant survived nearly seven months and then died. The weight of the child at birth was three pounds, but few observations were made relative to its maturity or immaturity. Fourteen medical witnesses, among whom was Dr. Christison, were sworn. It appeared that the mother had menstruated as usual the week before her marriage ; that she was both before and after in a very weak state of health ; that she was herself a seven months child, and that she had a second child which she believed to have been born at the commencement of the eighth month of her pregnancy. The case was a puzzling one to th? Scotch Presbytery, but it finally resulted in their finding the libel " not proven." Guy's Principles of Forensic Med., 208 - 9. Dr. Montgomery has thought it important to notice that from the results of accident, or the existence of disease in some of the structures of the ovum, especially in the placenta, the size and external characters of the fcetus may not correspond to the real period of gestation ; and that for the reason, that, in consequence of the diseased condition of the medium of support, an insufficient and unhealthy nutrition is afforded to the child, by which both its growth and natural development are retarded so much, that, at a given period, it will be found to present appearances properly belonging to a much earlier period of intra-uterine life. Mont gomery's Signs of Pregnancy, 259. Protracted Gestation. Many cases have arisen in the course of judicial proceedings, involving the question whether the period of gestation had a fixed limit, or was capable of being protracted beyond the usual term ; and in some cases the further question how far such pro- traction could, by possibility, reach. The opponents of protracted gestation urge, that the laws of nature on this subject are immutable ; that the fcetus, at a fixed period, has received all the nourishment of which it is susceptible LEGITIMACY. 85 from the mother, and becomes, as it were, a foreign body ; that married females are very liable to error in their calculations ; that the decision of tribunals in favor of protracted gestation cannot overturn a physical law ; and finally, that the virtue of females in these cases, is a very uncertain guide for legal decisions. They deny that experience shows that the children of old people are any longer in coming to maturity than any others. . They deny also that grief and the depressing passions possess or exercise any delaying power, insisting that they are more apt to produce abortion than protracted gestation. They urge that married women, usually basing their calculations upon suppres- sion of the menses, may be mistaken from the fact that they may be suppressed not only from disease, but also from affections of the mind, or accidental causes which do not immediately impair the health ; while the increase of volume in the abdomen may originate from this, or from numerous other causes. They also suggest a difficulty in distinguishing a delayed child from one that is born at nine months, as the evidences of delay or pro- traction, so far as regards the appearances about the child, do not seem to be clearly settled. 1 Beck's Med. Juris., 461 -2. In answer to these, besides the arguments already alluded to, it is urged that experiments prove that the impregnation of the ovum does not take place immediately upon the act of inter- course, but that a greater or less portion of time elapses between that act and the communication of the vivifying influence to the germ in the ovary ; leaving it probable, almost certain, that a variety of physical, and perhaps moral causes, may operate to cause delay in the impregnation. After impregnation the ovum is transferred from its seat in the ovary along the fallopian tube into the cavity of the uterus. Here also it is urged that every successive step in the progress of this transfer is liable to interruption. The ovulum may lie deeper than usual in the substance of the ovary. The texture of the latter may be thickened and indurated. There are also, says Mr. Burns, some causes that we cannot explain or discover, that have the power of retarding the process, the woman carry- ing the child longer than nme months ; and the child when born 86 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. being not larger than the average size. How long, he remarks, it is possible for labor to be delayed beyond the usual time, can- not be easily ascertained. It is also urged that the weight of authority in the medical world is decidedly in favor of the possibility of protracted gesta- tion. Among the names found in favor of it are those of Buffon, Burns, Capuron, Denman, Desormeaux, Dewees, Fodere, Gardien, Haller, Hamilton, Harvey, W. Hunter, La Motte, Lebas, Leroy, Levret, Mauriceau, Merriman, Murat, Petit, Richerand, Roussel, Smellie, Velpeau, and Zacchias, besides many others of no incon- siderable authority. Montgomery's Signs of Pregnancy, 269-70, and 271. Petit informs us that many faculties of medicine, forty-seven celebrated authors, and twenty-three physicians and surgeons, concluded pregnancy might be protracted to the eleventh or twelfth month. It is also urged that the laws of most civilized countries admit the possibility of protracted gestation, thus showing that legis- lators, and the common sense of the community, have favored this idea. Thus the law of France provides that the legitimacy of a child born within three hundred days after the death or departure of the husband shall not be questioned, and one born after that lapse of time may have its legitimacy contested. The Prussian civil code declares, that an infant born three hundred and two days after the death of the husband shall be considered legitimate. The Scotch law provides that to fix bastardy on a child, the husband's absence must continue till within six months of the birth, and a child born after the tenth month is accounted a bastard. The English and American law fixes no precise limit, but whenever the question has arisen for judicial determination, the decisions have always favored the possibility of protracted gesta- tion. Montgomery's Signs of Pregnancy, 277. There are some very extraordinary cases on record, which have been adjudged to be cases of protracted gestation. In 1638, a female brought forth a child one year and thirteen days after LEGITIMACY. 87 the death of her husband. She had labor pains during the whole previous month, and the parietal bones of the infant at birth were united. She had previously borne seven children, and had always been irregular in her calculations. The medical faculty of Leipsic being consulted, replied that there might be a frigidity of the genital organs, so as to cause a slow increase of the foetus ; and that the long continuance of the labor pains proved this to be a preternatural case. They decided that the offspring was legitimate. 1 Beck's Med. Juris., 458. A great number of cases are cited by Dr. Montgomery, and by Dr. Beck, in his chapter on legitimacy ; the former princi- pally from the statements of physicians and the works of medi- cal writers, and the latter of cases that had arisen for investiga- tion in judicial proceedings, all going to demonstrate the possi- bility of protracted gestation. The former remarks, in reference to the cases cited by him, that those appear to carry with them the fullest demonstration of their truth, in which the ordinary term was not extended by more than three or four weeks. Montgomery's Signs of Pregnancy, 271. A brief reference to a few cases that have been judicially in- vestigated, in which this question has arisen, and also on questions of contested paternity, will conclude the present subject. The case of Foster and others vs. Cook, reported in 3 Brown's Chancery Cases, 349, occurred in the English Court of Chancery. " Cook died on the 15th January, 1780, and on the 9th Novem- ber next following, (forty-three weeks wanting one day,) his widow was delivered of a son. This posthumous child was held to be the heir at law." The case termed the Gardner Peerage Case, is a leading case on this point, and much more celebrated than any other". The facts briefly are, that Capt. Gardner, afterwards Lord Gardner, married Miss Adderly in 1796. They lived together until 30th January, 1802, when he went to the West Indies, and returned to England on the 11th July following. For some time before, and during ills absence, Mrs. Gardner carried on an adulterous intercourse with one Henry Jadis. On the 8th December, 1802, Mrs. Gard- ner was privately delivered of a male child, which was christen- 88 medical ju:rispb.ude:nxe. ed by the name of the paramour, and brought up and treated as his son. Capt. Gardner subsequently obtained a divorce on the ground of the adultery of his wife, and married again. He suc- ceeded to the peerage in 1808, and died in 1815, leaving a son by his second marriage, who was a minor. In the year 1824, this son presented his petition to the King, praying to be entered on the Parliament roll as a minor Peer. In this he was opposed by Henry Fenton Jadis, alias Gardner, who claimed to be the eldest son of Lord Gardner, and therefore entitled to the peer- age. In this case there were two principal questions proposed to the medical witnesses : 1. Could a child, born on the 8th December, have been the result of sexual intercourse either on the 30th January, or an- terior to it, being 311 days 1 2. Could a cMld, born on the 8th of December, and living to manhood, have been the result of sexual intercourse on or after the 11th of July, a period of 150 days, or two or three days short of five calendar months 1 Thus, if the child were legitimate, he must have been either a five months child, or a three hundred and eleven days child. The first alternative was abandoned, there being no evidence to show its immaturity at the time of its birth. In regard to the second, involving the question of protracted gestation, there were several medical gentlemen examined, many of whom were then the most distinguished accoucheurs in London. Of the seventeen that underwent examination, five gave their opinion in favor of a fixed period of pregnancy, although each one fixed upon a period of different length from every other. The other twelve gave their opinion in favor of protracted gestation. Their different opinion's are given somewhat at length in 1 Beck's Elements of Medical Jurisprudence, 463, et seq. The weight of medical testimony was decidedly in favor of pro- tracted gestation, but the decision was made to turn upon other questions, viz., the concealment of the birth from the husband, and the well established fact of the adultery of the mother. The son of Lord Gardner by the second marriage obtained the peerage. LEGITIMACY. 89 Vexed and difficult questions sometimes arise in consequence of a widow marrying a second time, almost immediately after the death of the first husband. She may, in such case, be delivered ,)f a child within ten months from the time of her husband's leath, and then the question would arise, to which husband would the infant belong ? The Romans endeavored to avoid this juestion, by forbidding the widow to marry until after the ex- piration of ten months, and subsequently, until the expiration )f twelve months. As neither the English nor American law has any such pro- rision, a question of that kind arising, must be solved on physi- )!ogical principles. Li the reign of Richard II., a woman immediately after the leath of the first husband, took a second, and had issue born ibrty weeks and eleven days after the death of the first husband. ] t was held to be the issue of the second husband. Another case is stated in Hal-grave's Notes, and also in Croke Jac, 686 : " Thecar marries a lewd woman, but she doth not cohabit with him, and is suspected of incontinency with Dun- comb. Thecar dies ; Duncomb within three weeks of his death, names her ; and two hundred and eighty-one days and six- l een hours after his death, she is delivered of a son. Here it was agreed, 1 . If she had not married Duncomb, without question, the issue should not be a bastard, but should be adjudged the son of Thecar : 2. No averment shall be received that Thecar did not cohabit with his wife : 3. Though it be possible that the son might be begotten after the husband's death, yet being a question of fact, it was tried by a jury, and the son was found to be the issue of Thecar. The case of John and Jacob Redlion vs. Woolverton, as quoted in 1 Beck, 484, from Hazard's Register of Pennsylvania, 7, 363, is an American case of some interest. The plaintiifs were brothers of Christian Redlion, deceased, upon whose death with- out issue, they were entitled, under the will of Michael Redlion, their father, to a considerable sum of money. Christian, the 90 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. deceased, Avas married to Catharine Stout in the spring of 1825, and died on the 5th November of the same year. Catharine, his widow, married Thomas Woolverton, the defendant, on the 16th of March, 1826 ; and on the 15th of September., 1826, she had a t son born, who survived. The question was, who was the father, the first or second husband"? The first husband committed suicide, and from his death to the birth of the child was ten months and fourteen days, while from the marriage with the second husband to the birth, was only six months. The cause was decided in favor of the plaintiffs, the child being considered as the issue of the second husband, or at least not as the issue <>£ the first. It has been suggested that the resemblance of the child to its supposed father, might be a valuable means of determining its paternity. This, however, on examination, will turn out to be a very uncertain source of evidence to be relied upon. Although, as a general rule, there is little doubt but that fea- tures and physical forms, as well as mental and moral characteris- tics and peculiarities, are transmissable from parents to children j yet they do not always show themselves in the next succeeding generation. Instances are not unfrequent, of the reappearance of both the physical and mental and moral peculiarities of pa- rents, in the second and even the third generation of their suc- cessors. In cases of very marked resemblance, that fact should undoubtedly be taken into consideration in determining the question of paternity. But if there were no such resemblance, it should not be considered as equally conclusive testimony on the other side, as the resemblance might be greater to a more remote ancestor, and that either on the side of the father or mother. It is however stated, that much reliance can be placed upon the fact of color, to prove paternity ; that when the appearance of the child evidently proves that its father must have been of a different race from the husband, as when a mulatto is born of a white woman whose husband is also white, that must afford a clear indication of parentage. There is, however, a singular fact in relation to this, related in Fowler's work on hereditary L£&it11»*CY. 91 decent, 34 V Two white parents in New Jersey had a child bearing unstpiSocal icarks of African race and blood. It had the flat nose, thick lips, curly hair, and dark skin of a mulatto. It came near creating difficulty in the family, until, on visiting a town in France where the family of the wife had resided for several generations, it was found that her- great grandfather was an African. Thus, although the peculiarities of that race had disappeared in two or three generations, yet it again reappeared , very unexpectedly in this fifth generation. The case of The Commissioners of the Almshouse vs. Whistelo, which was tried in New-York in 1808, and will be found report- ed in 3 Wheeler's Criminal Cases, 194, was one not less curious in its facts than in the discussions contained in it. Lucy Williams, a mulatto woman, was delivered, on the 23d of January, 1807, of a female bastard child, which became a public charge. She charged it upon Alexander Whistelo, a black man. Upon the production of the child, it was found that its color was somewhat dark, but lighter than the generality of mulattoes ; and that its hair was straight, and had none of the peculiarities of the negro race. The woman in this case made oath that the defendant was the father of the child, but she admitted that a white person on one occasion had been in bed with her, and she had connexion with him. Physicians were sworn to the number of fourteen, several of whom stood high in the foremost ranks of the profession. With the single exception of Dr. Mitchell, they were very unani- mous in the opinion that by the laws of nature, the defendant could not be the father of the child ; and in their judgment, he was not. Dr. Mitchell admitted that it presented an anomaly in its appearance, but was nevertheless inclined to the opinion that the paternity was rightly charged. The whole proceedings on the trial, and especially the examination of Dr. Mitchell, and the summing up the cause by the celebrated Sampson, are in the highest degree amusing, and possessing a lively interest. The mayor, De Witt Clinton, gave the opinion of the court in favor of the defendant, deciding against the express oath of the woman. 92 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. on the strength of the medical testimony, and the fact that she had sworn to her having connexion with a white man. VI. DELIVERY. The last subject included under the first general division or class, embracing the consideration of things growing out of the sexual relations, is Delivery. It becomes necessary to under- stand this principally with the view, not alone of being able to recognize it on its occurrence, but also of detecting cases of con- cealed and pretended delivery. The first may be undertaken for the purpose of destroying the offspring immediately after birth, or of hiding the shame of the individual by preventing a public exposure. The motive prompting to the second may be various. It may be done 1 . To produce a supposititious heir to an estate, 2. To influence the feelings of a paramour with a view to mar- riage, or 3. To satisfy the wishes or appease the anger of a husband. In relation to concealed delivery, the physician in suspected cases, should make enquiries as to the following points. 1 . What are the proofs of previous pregnancy 1 And this en- quiry should be conducted particularly in reference to the sensi- ble signs and indications of pregnancy, particularly enlargement of the abdomen, and whether such enlargement was connected with any apparent disease. 2. To the proofs of recent delivery hereafter noticed. 3. To the connection between the supposed period of delivery and the state or condition of the child found as to its maturity or immaturity. Pretended delivery usually presents itself, 1. Where the female has never before been pregnant, or 2. Where one or more deliveries have previously occurred, or 3. Where there has been an actual delivery and the female substitutes a living for a dead child. The first is the most easily detected. There are signs of real DELIVERY. 93 delivery which cannot be feigned. "An enlargement of the orifice of the uterus, and a tumefaction of the organs of generation should always be present ; and if wanting are conclusive against the fact." 1 Beck's Med. Juris., 213. A case is mentioned by Dr. Male, in winch a physician was called to a pretended labor, and a dead child was presented to him, but there was no pla- centa. On examining he found the os tincse in its natural state, nearly closed, and the vagina so much contracted as not to admit the hand. It turned out to be'a case of deception, the object of which was to appease the wrath of her husband. Another case is also mentioned by Dr. Beck. 1 Beck, 214, in which the physician was enabled to detect the deception from the following named facts : 1 . The infant produced instead of being 53 hours old as stated, presented every appearance of being from five to seven days old. 2. The cord had evidently been secured by some one under- standing it. 3. The breasts presented no enlargement, nor any marks of the secretion of milk. 4. There were no linese albicantia on the abdomen. 5. There was no discharge from the vagina which was con tracted and the labia natural. 6. The mouth of the uterus was neither tumefied nor irregu- lar. 7. The uterus itself was light and easily raised, and had the feel of perfect contraction. The fraud was subsequently confessed. In regard to the second, the difficulty in determining is some- what increased, especially if the examination is not made within eight or ten days, ' while in reference to the third, that can only be decided by physical proofs, unless some persons have been present at the delivery. The following are the principal questions that arise for discus- sion under this head. 1. Can a woman be delivered and be, at the time, unconsci- ous of it ; and can she remain unconscious after the occurrence of such an event 1 94 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. 2. Can a woman, if alone at the time of the delivery, prevent her child from perishing after the event. 3. What are the signs and indications of recent delivery, and within what time should the examination be made ] 4. Are there any, and what diseases, the effects of which may be mistaken for the traces of a recent delivery 1 5. Are there any signs or indications by which it may be de- termined, whether a woman has ever borne a child, although at a period remote from that of the examination 1 6. What is the possible number of children that may be pro- duced at one birth 1 7. Under what circumstances, and by what means is it moral- ly, legally and medically proper, to induce premature labor ? 8. The changes that occur in the fcetal state and the signs of maturity or immaturity of the child. 9. An enquiry into the state necessary to enable a new born infant to inherit, including the question of viability. 10. What are the signs and indications of the life or death of the child before or during delivery 1 11. Delivery after the death of the mother and Caesarian operation. 12. In case of the death of the mother, what are the signs and indications of delivery that may be revealed by dissection 1 It will be perceived that here are grouped together a great number of subjects of investigation, nearly all of which may be- come important in reference to the perpetration of frauds and impositions ; in cases of alleged infanticide ; and in questions relating to the descent of property. We shall treat them briefly in the order stated. 1 . Can a woman be delivered, and be at the time unconscious of it, and can she remain unconscious after the occurrence of the event 1 The first part of the question must be answered in the affir- mative under peculiar circumstances. These may be I. The influence of narcotics or ardent spirits. In 1G41 the Countess de Saint Geran, was delivered of a boy whilst stupified by narcotics. On awaking in the morning she found herself DELIVERY. 95 bathed in blood and the infant gone. Her relations had done it from interested motives. 2. Its occurrence is also possible, without consciousness, in cases of coma, delirium, and puerperal convulsions. A case is mentioned by Dr. Cheyne, where a female was delivered of a living child during an attack of apoplexy. 3. It has even occurred during sleep, two cases of which are cited by Dr. Montgomery. The one was a case of great respec- tability, being the wife of a peer of the realm, who was actually delivered in her sleep. The other case is stated on the authority of Dr. Douglass. Guy's Principles of Forensic Med., 120 ; Mont- gomery's Signs of Pregnancy , 313. 4. It has also occurred during suspended animation, or even after the death of the mother. This is certainly an extraordinary fact, but it rests on high authority. It is attested by Fodere, Buffon, Bichat, and others. Guy's Med. Juris., 120 ; Montgomery's Signs of Pregnancy, 312 ; 1 Beck's Med. Juris., 228. Dr. Sloyer of Mulhausen, has given an account of a female dying in labor, who was put on the bier for interment, and while there, an infant was suddenly born. This must be owing to the independent contractile power of the uterus, and shows the con- i,. nuance of the nervous and muscular, after the cessation, or reparation from the organism, of the sensorial power, which lat- ter is what constitutes death. Thus the possibility of this event is clearly shown, but it must occur under peculiar circumstances, and it may well be doubted whether it can ever occur during a natural sleep to a woman in her first pregnancy, or to any one unless she have borne many children, and have naturally a very easy delivery. But in relation to the second branch of the question, it is hardly possible, under any of these circumstances, that a woman can be afterwards ignorant that she has been delivered. This cannot happen except in cases of mental alienation or disturbance lasting through a considerable period of time. An extraordinary case of this kind is related by Dr. Montgomery, in which the woman lost her power of recollection for the preceding six months, her 9(5 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE delivery occurring during that time. Montgomery's Signs of Pregnancy , 311-12. 2. Can a woman, if alone at the time of the delivery, prevent her child from perishing after the event 1 This question has its most important bearing on the subject of infanticide, and is by many medical jurists discussed in con- nexion with that subject. The answer to it would probably be in the affirmative, if the mother were self-possessed, and had enjoyed her ordinary health and strength, unless under peculiar circumstances. Thus if the delivery be early and very rapid, there may be such a conformation of the pelvis, and so powerful an action of the uterus, that the membranes and foetus are sud- denly expelled together. In such case the child might fall, and its death ensue, if she remained unassisted. So also it is possibL i that a woman may be taken in labor and delivered while passing her feces. Instances of this have occurred but rarely if at all in a first pregnancy. The delivery may also be attended with haemorrhage, fainting or convulsions, and the female be unable to assist her offspring. The child may also have its face to the sacrum, and be delivered with it downwards ; in which position it cannot breathe unless it be turned ; and a very slight cause suspending respiration at its very commencement, would have the effect to destroy it. The infant from weakness at birth, may perish for want of warming and other applications. 1 Beck's Med. Juris., 229, et seq. It is also obvious that the infant may perish without any de- fault of the mother, when the umbilical cord has not been tied after being cut, broken or torn. In reference to all this, the principle laid down by Dr. Beck (see 1 Beck, 232,) is undoubt edly true, viz : " That every woman is more or less acquainted with the time when she is to be in labor, and that it is her duty never to be so far alone as to render assistance accidental." 3. What are the signs and indications of recent delivery, and within what time should the examination be made 1 The following are relied upon as the signs and indications of recent delivery : 1 . Face paler than usual, eyes depressed, and surrounded by DELIVERY. 97 a slightly brownish circle ; the expression of the countenance resembling that of a person recovering from a slight indisposition ; the pulse somewhat accelerated ; the skin soft-, warm, and relaxed, with a moisture having a peculiar and sometimes un- pleasant odor. 2. The breasts, if examined the third or fourth day after de- livery, will be found full, tense and hard or knotty, and if pressed will yield a lactiform fluid. The nipples appear turgid, and the areola fully developed as hereinbefore described. The first se- cretion of the breasts has generally a yellow color, is thick, tena- cious and ropy, and coagulates by heat, acids and alcohol. Mont- gomery's Signs of Pregnancy, 303. 3. The abdomen is full, its integuments relaxed, or thrown into folds ; the skin remarkably moveable on the subjacent mus- cles. The light colored, broken streaks or cracks are present, called the linese albicantia. These are the most numerous from the groins andpubes towards the umbilicus, which is often found projecting and of a conical form. The uterus does not imme- diately contract and resume its original form', and hence if the hand be pressed over the pubic region, a tumor is felt, produced by the imperfectly contracted uterus, which is about the size of the head of a new born child, and rises three or four inches above the brim of the pelvis, inclining more to one side than the other. 4. The external parts of generation are swollen and sometimes contused or torn, especially after a first or a difficult labor ; and they also partake of the relaxed state of the internal parts. The vagina is greatly relaxed and dilated, its internal surface ren- dered smooth, its natural rugse being obliterated by the recent distention of its tissues. ' If examination be made shortly after delivery, the orifice of the os uteri is found in such a patulous state that its margins cannot be distinctly recognized, as they ap- pear to be merely the continuation of the vagina itself. The state and condition of the uterus and os uteri must be made by an examination per vaginam. The first is found very much enlarged, and its identity with the abdominal tumor is es- tablished. The latter is found gaping open so wide in a woman: 7 98 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. recently delivered, that two or three fingers might be introduced into it with ease. Its margins are flabby and much relaxed, and often feel as if divided by several small fissures. 5. Laceration of the perineum. In the case of delivery for the first time, it frequently happens that the fourchette is torn, and sometimes the rent extending backwards divides the perineum to a greater or less extent. This, however, is simply a contin- gency that may or may not happen according to circumstances. 6. The lochia. This is a sanguineous discharge flowing from the ruptured blood vessels in the interior of the uterus. It is not, therefore, like the last, an occasional, but a constant attendant, commencing from the time of delivery, and continuing for a pe- riod varying between four or five days to as many weeks. Thif discharge generally continues red for the first three or four days, then becomes nearly colorless or acquires a brownish or greenish hue, from which it is sometimes called the green waters, and af- ter a week or eight days it generally altogether ceases. This fluid is best known by its peculiar odor, by which it is distinguished from menstruation, leuchorrhcea, or other morbid discharges. It has been spoken of as resembling ' fish oil,' while others call it a sour smell, and the peculiar odor of it, as stated by some, it is impossible to destroy. Montgomery's Signs of Pregnancy, 303, et seq ; Guy's Med. Juris., 117 ; 1 Beck's Med. Juris., 207-8. In relation to the time, within which examination should be made, in order that any reliable evidence can be drawn from these signs and indications, it is extremely difficult to fix upon any general rule. Owing to differences in constitution, states of health, and habits of life, there is great diversity observable among women in regard to the time required in recovering from a delivery. While some require scarcely a day, others are en- feebled for weeks. Still as there is a period in all when the parts return to their natural state, and all the indications of recent de- livery disappear, and it is extremely desirable to have some rule stated, the term of eight or ten days has been fixed upon by the majority of writers, beyond which an examination can disclose nothing possessing any value as evidence. After thst period the DELIVERY. 99 signs become so equivocal as, if relied upon, very often to lead to error. 1 Beck's Med. Juris., 209. 4. Are there any, and what, diseases whose effects may be mistaken for the traces of a recent delivery 1 In regard to the first indication mentioned, it must be obvious that many diseases will render the face paler than usual, give ac- celeration to the pulse, and probably cause the other appearan- ces mentioned to be presented. As to the other signs and indi- cations, it is remarked by Paris and Fonblanque, that " dropsi- cal discharges from the uterus, uterine hcemorrhage, the expul- sion of a mole, hydatids, or polypus j or the removal of any of those diseases which constitute what has been termed a false con- ception, have been said to occasion effects which simulate the signs of parturition. There are some signs common both to the diseases in question, and to the delivery, but there are at the same time others that exclusively indicate the occurrence of the latter ; the irruption of fluids from the womb, menorrhagia, and leucorrhcea, may mimic the lochia! discharge, but they will not remain nor will they present that characteristic odor by which the latter is so pre-eminently distinguished. So again, the re- laxation of the soft parts may be the consequence of disease as well as of delivery, while the paleness of the visage is the usual concomitant of profuse evacuation ; but then the distention of the vagina, and the state of the neck of the uterus, and the ab- sence of all contusions, lacerations and discolorations will obviate the possibility of deducing any erroneous conclusioa from these phenomena. The wrinkles and marks upon the abdomen may certainly follow any considerable change in the reduction of its bulk, whether it be the result of parturition, ascitic discharges or the absorption of fat ; but we may easily disarm such signs of their treachery, by a previous enquiry into the state of the wo- man's health, and into that of her robustness and general strength. Burns, also remarks, that other circumstances may concur in confirming the opinion of the practitioner, as, for instance, if the patient give an absurd account of the way in which "her bulk suddenly left her, ascribing it to a perspiration, which never, in a single night, can carry off the size of the abdomen at the end 100 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. of a supposed pregnancy. 1 Paris §• Foriblanque's Med. Juris. , 254-5. From these remarks will arise the obvious reflection, that no inconsiderable degree of importance must be attached to the con- currence of a great number of the signs and indications of de- livery. As Chaussier very well remarks, there is no disease or affection, besides parturition, which can possibly produce the whole series of signs above described. Montgomery's Signs of Pregnancy, 305. It may be proper here to remark that it is not every pregnancy that terminates in a delivery. A woman may be pregnant and the fruit of her womb may be blighted at any period of gesta- tion. Notwithstanding that, it may be retained in utero, until the full time is accomplished, while the size of the abdomen happen ingj from some other accidental cause, to continue increasing. until the expulsion of the blighted ovum occurs, the woman may be suspected of having brought forth a child. Strange as it ma y appear, when even the full term of utero-gestation has been ac- complished, and the life of the foetus has been distinctly recog- nized, it has not been followed by the birth of a child. Dr. Montgomery gives a remarkable case of this kind occurring in his own practice, and also quotes one from Morgagni. Mont- gomery's Signs of Pregnancy, 300 - 1 . Upon the strength of these cases he very properly remarks, that these demonstrate the im- perfection of the rule of law concerning concealment of birth, in order to prove which, it is held sufficient to ascertain, that there has 'been a pregnancy, or a delivery ; for in those cases pregnan- cy was clearly ascertained, the motions of the child were strongly felt, and the full term of gestation was accomplished, and yet no child was born, lb., 302. 5. Are there any signs or indications by which it may be de- termined whether a woman has ever borne a child, although at a period remote from that of the examination 1 There is, probably, little under this head of enquiry that can be possessed of much real value to the medical jurist. The fol- lowing indications are chiefly collected from Paris and Fon- blanque ; but they very properly remark, that singly, they can DELIVER V. furnish but very slender evidence; and should they even all occur together, they must be regarded as affording only a strong presumption of the fact. 1 . The loss of the signs of virginity : 2. The orifice of the uterus has not its usual conic figure ; its lips are unequal, and it is more open than in those who have never borne children : 3. There is a roughness of the abdomen, the parietes of which are also more expanded and pensile : 4. There are small, white, and shining lines running on the surface of the abdomen, the linsea albicantia : 5. The frsenum of the labia obliterated : 6. The breasts are more flaccid and pendulous, and the lines on their surface are white and splendid : 7. The nipples are prominent, and the color of their discs brown. 1 Paris # Fonblanque's Med. Juris., 256. 6. What is the possible number of children that may be pro- duced at one birth 1 Paris and Fonblanque say, that according to the most accurate estimates, twin cases, on an average, occur about once in ninety labors ; and triplets are considered more rare. They are stated not to take place more than once in three thousand times. The occurrence of four at a birth is so rare an event, that no calcu- lation has been formed upon the subject. Dr. Osborne states that he has distinctly traced as many as six foetuses in an abor- tion. 1 Paris §• Fonblanque's Med. Juris., 259. 7. Under what circumstances, and by what means, is it moral- ly, legally, and medically proper, to induce premature labor 1 The means by which premature labor may be effected, belong entirely to the medical profession. In cases where this became necessary, the practitioner would be held responsible for a resort to the best means the profession had it in its power to furnish. The most certain, efficient, and generally resorted to, are me- chanical. It is well known, that premature labor may be in- duced by a mechanical operation. The most difiicult medico-legal question is, to determine under what circumstances it is proper or necessary to bring on prema 102 MEOICAL JURISPRUDENCE. ture labor. Cases occur of a pelvis so distorted that a fuL grown fcetus cannot pass through without mutilation, and in which this operation may be performed with perfect safety to the mother, and sometimes to the child also. Dr. Denman re- lates, that in 1756, there was a consultation of the most eminent men at the time in London, to consider of the moral rectitude, and the advantages which might be expected from this practice, and that it met with their general approbation. 1 Paris # Fon- blanque^ s Med. Juris., 271. Mr. J. Barlow had recourse to this practice, in cases of dis J torted pelvis, eighteen times in five women ; the result of which was, that all the women recovered, and of the children thus brought into the world, six were dead and twelve born alive, some dying soon after birth, one living ten months, and five were living at the time the account was published. His method con- sisted in exciting premature labor early in the seventh month of pregnancy Ibid., 272. Dr. Hull, as quoted by Paris and Fonblanque, doubts the pro- priety of resorting to this practice in any deformed woman, be- fore the crotchet has been found necessary, and employed in a previous labor. He says, it has happened in a number of in- stances, that where the perforator and crotchet have been resort- ed to in the delivery of the first child, the women have subse- quently been delivered of one or more living children at the rail time. Dr. Merriman observes, that a regard to his own character should determine the acteoucheur not to perform this operation, unless some other respectable practitioner has seen the patient, and has acknowledged that the operation is advisable. 1 Paris fy Fonblanque 's Med. Juris., 273. It; would seem as if the law ought to interpose no obstacle to resorting to this practice, at any period of gestation, for the pur- pose of saving the life of the mother ; and yet the legislation of this State is of a character to throw a degree of distressing em- barrassment upon this question. The statutory provisions at present in force, are to be found in the act passed May 13th, 1845, Session Laws, 285 ; the first section, however ', being amend- DELIVERY. 103 ed by an act passed at the next session. That first section, as amended, substantially prohibits every person from administer- ing to any woman pregnant with a quick child, any medicine, drug, or substance, or from using any instrument or other means, with intent to destroy such child, unless the same shall have been necessary to preserve the life of the mother ; otherwise, in case of the death of the child or mother, it should be manslaughter in the second degree. The next section prohibits every person from administering to any pregnant woman, or prescribing for such woman, or advising or procuring any such woman to take any medicine, drug, sub- stance or thing whatever, or from using or employing any instru- ments or other means whatever, with intent to procure the mis- carriage of any such woman ; and prescribes the punishment to be, imprisonment in a county jail not less than three months nor more than one year; It will be perceived that there are at least two marked differ- ences between these two sections. In the first, the woman must be pregnant with a quick child ; in the second, she may merely be pregnant without having quickened. In the first is contain- ed the exception of its necessity to preserve the life of the mother; in the second there is no such exception. We are, therefore, re- duced to the sad humility of admitting, that by the legislation of this State, in all cases of distorted pelvis, or other anomalies of a kindred character resulting from malformation or disease, the physician, in order himself to escape the consequences of vio- lated law, must delay affording relief to the mother until the period of her quickening, when perhaps it would come too late ; and then he may be safe in affording it, if it be necessary to pre- serve her life. Legislatures are much better versed in the mise- rable tactics of party, than in the well settled and permanent laws of physiology. What ..tends, in a peculiar manner, to sub- ject this to animadversion, is, that a section of this act repeals a statutory provision previously existing, in which the same ex- ception was contained in the second section above mentioned as in the first, which of course would entirely remove the objection 104 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. above made to that section. The act of 1845 was, therefore, not only sinning against light, but knowledge also. It may be urged, it is true, that the act of the physician being to save the life of the mother, is done with no criminal intent, and therefore can no more be considered illegal, than a surgical operation. But the section alluded to, does not, in terms, re- quire a criminal intent. It only requires the intent to procure the miscarriage; and this intent is certainly that of the physician whose only object is relief to the mother. Besides, if this is an implied exception, why express it in the previous section 1 Its insertion in one section and omission in the next, ought, in jus- tice to the Legislature, to have some meaning attached to it. 8. The changes that occur in the foetal state, and the signs of maturity and immaturity of the child. It is important, in reference to many questions connected with Medical Jurisprudence, that the medical jurist should be enabled to trace the progress of foetal life, and to understand the changes it undergoes while in its intra-uterine state. The following brief outline, designed to sketch off the most striking characteristics of that progress, is collected mainly from the works of Drs. Beck and Guy. It requires some period of time, and, (if the human subject is, in this respect, analogous to some species of the brute creation,) some days must elapse, before the impregnated ovum is convey- ed through the fallopian tube into the uterus. It is generally stated to require some twenty days to elapse, before a denned ovum, containing a denned embryo, can be discovered in the uterus. It has undoubtedly been seen earlier, and within twelve days from conception. It has been even said to be visible only eight days after impregnation. In two weeks, the embryo mea- sures one-twelfth of an inch ; in three, one-tenth ; and in four, three to five lines. At this last mentioned time, it is of the size of a large ant, a bailey-corn, or a house fly. Its weight is now about twenty grains. Its form resembles that of a serpent ; a swelling indicating the head, while the other extremity is slender and terminates in the umbilical cord. A cleft indicates the mouth, two black points the eyes, the liver occupies the whol* DELIVERY. 105 abdomen, the bladder is large, while the members begin to appear as nipple-like protuberances. At six weeks very considerable changes are found to have taken place. Its length varies from seven to ten lines. Its weight from forty to seventy-five grains. The face is now dis tinct from the cranium. The head appears distinct from the thorax. The apertures of the nose, mouth, eyes and ears are perceptible. The hands, fore-arms and fingers are distinct. Legs and feet are near the anus. The umbilicus is disiinct. The placenta begins to be formed. The umbilical vesicle is large. There are even points of ossification in the clavicle and maxillary bone. At two months another series of changes present. Length about two inches, weight from three to five drachms. We have now the rudiments of the nose and lips. The arms and legs are detached from the trunk. The anus is marked by a dark spot, and the clitoris or penis is apparent. We can discern the rudi- ments of the lungs, spleen and supra-renal capsules. The pla- centa begins to assume its regular form ; the umbihcal vessels are becoming twisted. There are points of ossification in the frontal bone and .in the ribs. At three months, the length varies from two and a half or three to six inches ; its weight from one and a half to two and a half ounces. The head has now a considerable volume ; the mouth is closed ; the fingers separated. The eyes are shut ; the eyelids adhere together. The head is longer and heaviei than the rest of the body ; the umbilical cord is formed ; the genitals are dis- tinct, the penis or clitoris relatively very large ; the nymphse are projecting and the labia are thick. The two ventricles of the heart are distinct. The placenta is completely isolated. At four months, the length is from five to six, seven or eight inches ; the weight from five to seven or eight ounces. The ex- ternal parts are now all developed except the hair and nails. The main characteristics now are, that the skin is rosy and dense ; the mouth large and open ; genital organs and sex distinct ; gall bladder beginning to appear ; meconium in duodenum ; coecal valve visible ; umbilicus placed near the pubes ; points of ossifi- 106 MEDICAL JUB.ISFKUDENCE. cation in the inferior part of the sacrum ; the great relative pro- portion of the fluid of the membranes disappears, and the i'cetus nearly fills the cavity of the uterus. At five months, length from seven to nine inches ; weight from five to seven ounces. The volume of the head is yet compara- tively great. The brain is pulpy and is destitute of circumvolu- tions or furrows. Heart and kidneys are voluminous ; nails are now distinct j hair begins to appear ; skin is without sebaceous covering ; the gall bladder is distinct j points of ossification in the pubis and os calcis ; the germs of the permanent teeth are perceptible. At six months, the length is from nine to twelve inches ; the weight between one and two pounds. The skin now begins to present the appearance of a fibrous structure, and some traces of fat are found under the integuments. The head now begins to become smaller in comparison with the body. It is still large and soft and the fontanelles expanded. The brain acquires more consistence but is still easily dissolved. The eyelids are still ag- glutinated. The scrotum is slightly developed in males, and of a bright red color ; the testicles are still in the abdomen. In females the vulva is projecting, and the labia separated by the protuberance of the clitoris. The face is of a purplish red ; the hair is white or silvery ; sebaceous covering beginning to appear ; meconium in the upper part of the large intestines ; lungs small and compact ; liver very large and situated near the umbilicus, and of a dark red color ; the gall bladder contains insipid serous fluid ; the bladder is hard and pyriform, and has a very small cavity. Points of ossification are in the four divisions of the sternum. The middle point of the body is at the lower end of the sternum. At seven months, the length is from twelve to fourteen inches, the weight from two to four pounds. The skin is now of a rosy hue, thick and fibrous, and covered with sebaceous matter. The eyelids no longer adhere together. The cerebral mass becomes more consistent, and its surface a little furrowed. The meconium increases in quantity and occupies nearly the whole of the large intestines. The hair on the head is longer and takes a deeper DELIVERY. 107 hue. The nails acquire more firmness. Vulvuke conniventes are beginning to appear. The gall bladder begins to contain bile. Point of ossification is in the astragalus. The middle point of the body is a little below the end of the sternum. At eight months, the length is from fifteen to seventeen inches, and the weight from four to five pounds. The skin is now paler, has acquired more density, is covered with fine short hairs, and with a sebaceous envelope. The nails are firmer and reach to the extremity of the fingers. The membrana pupillaris disap- pears. The testicles descend into the internal ring. The lungs are of a reddish color ; the liver preserves nearly its former rela- tive size, but is more remote from the navel. The fluid in the gall bladder is of a yellowish color, and has a bitter taste. The point of ossification is in the last vertebra of the sacrum. The middle point of the body is nearer the umbilicus than the sternum. At nine months, or the full term, the length varies from seven teen to twenty inches, the weight is six and a half pounds. The head is covered with hair frequently an inch in length. The skin is covered with sebaceous matter. The membrana pupil- laris is absent. The bones' of the cranium touch each other with their membranous margins, the fontanelles becoming smaller. The nails become more solid and are prolonged to the extremity of the fingers. The white and gray substances of the brain are distinct, and the circumvolutions on its surface are* more nume- rous. The cerebellum and the basis of the cerebrum have ac quired a remarkable consistence. The lungs are redder and more voluminous ; the liver descends to the umbilicus ; the testes have passed the inguinal ring, and are frequently found in the scrotum. The head measures longitudinally from four to four and a quarter inches, and between the parietal protuberances from three and an half to four. Point of ossification is in the centre of the cartilage at the lower end of the femur ; the os hyoides is not yet ossified ; four portions of occipital bone remain distinct ; the external auditory meatus is still cartilaginous. The bladder contains urine. The meconium is found at the termina- tion of the large intestine. The digestive apparatus, the heart 108 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. and the lungs, are in a condition to commence extra-uterine life. The middle of the body is at the navel or a very little below. The following are the changes that occur in the brain. " Al the fourth week the mass corresponding to the head in the em- bryo is transparent, containing a limpid fluid. At the seventh and eighth weeks the form and disposition of the brain and spinal cord can be distinguished. The dura mater may be also observed adhering to the inner surface of the skull. During the third month, the tubercula quadrigemina, the optic thalami, and cor- pora striata are developed ; and in the eleventh week, the cere- bellum and the hemispheres were recognised. At the fourth month, the tuber annulare and the pituitary gland were observed. The corpus callosum, in the sixth month, is only half as long as the hemispheres of the brain. The choroid plexus is formed in the seventh month, and the corpora olivaria do not protrude till between the sixth and seventh, but the corpora pyramidalia are fully formed a month sooner ; and in both, the protrusion is owing to the development of cineritious matter. It is not till near the termination of pregnancy, that the cineritious substance is formed in the spine, or even very manifestly in the convolu- tions of the brain. 1 Beck's Med. Juris., 245 ; Guy's Principles of Forensic Medicine, 126-7. The relative proportions between the cerebrum and cerebellum become changed as pregnancy advances. At five months, the proportion is as 18^ to 1 ; at eight months, as 13/ ? to 1 ; and at the full time, as 12| to 1. The following exhibits the results of Beclard's observations on the foetal skeleton : At two months, length of skeleton, four inches and three lines ; spine, two inches. At three months, length of skeleton, six inches ; spinal pro- portion, as two and two-thirds to six. At four months and a half, length of skeleton, nine inches ; spir_e, four inches. At six months, length of skeleton, twelve inches ; spine, five inches. DELIVER?. 109 At seven and a half months, length of skeleton, fifteen inches ; spine, six and one-third inches. At nine months, length of ikeleton, eighteen inches ; spinal proportion, as seven and three-fourths to eighteen. Each vertebra is formed by three principal points of ossifica- tion ; one anterior, forming the body or solid part of the bone, and two lateral, constituting the apophysaical masses, which, uniting with the former, complete the annular structure. 1 Beckys Med. Juris., 246. Both the weight and length of the fcetus, at the time of delive- ry, have been the subjects of many observations. Considerable discussion on these subjects will be found in 1 Beck's Med. Juris., 247, et seq., and Guy's Principles of Forensic Medicine, 127, et seq. The weight is found to differ considerably, owing, proba- bly to a variety of causes. The weight varies in different na- tions ; or, what is more probable, in the different races of men as identified by ethnography. It varies in the two sexes ; and it varies according to the health, habits, and peculiar idiosyncra- cies of the parents. -In France, the weight is less than in England. The average weight in the former, according to Camus, and also to a great number of observations subsequently made at Paris, is six and one-quarter pounds. From a great number of observations made in England, and from the results of Dr. Joseph Clark's enquiries, it appears that the far greater proportion weigh from five to eight pounds; that the average weight of male children was seven pounds five ounces and seven drachms ; and that of fe- male, six pounds eleven ounces and six drachms; and that, taking the average, weight of both sexes, twelve males are as heavy as thirteen females. It is stated as a probable fact, that in this country the average weight exceeds seven pounds. This was the opinion both of Professor Dewees, and also of Professor Willoughby. Instances of much greater weights are on record. Several are given of *welve pounds, twelve and three-quarters, thirteen pounds thir- teen ounces, fourteen pounds ; two by Dewees, of fifteen pounds ; one of sixteen and a half, in New- York. The largest weight. 110 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. recorded by Billard is twenty-seven pounds. 1 Beck's Med. Juris.., 250; Guy's Principles of Forensic Medicine, 129. On the other extreme, in one instance, a child at the age of six weeks, weighed but two and a half pounds, with its clothes on. Two cases have occurred in Brooklyn, (N. Y.,) in one of which, a child born at the full time weighed one pound and nine ounces, and lived five months. The other child weighed, at birth, but one pound, and lived five weeks. The smallest weight among several thousand children recorded by Billard, is two pounds thir- teen ounces and four drachms. Guy's Principles of Forensic Medi- cine, 129. In cases of twins, the united weight is generally greater than where there is a single foetus, although their individual weight is less. The average weight' of twelve twins was eleven pounds the pair, or five and a half each. Among four hundred and forty- four pair weighed in Paris, the average weight was four pounds each, and the extremes were three and eight pounds. In a case which occurred at Fairfield, (N, Y.,) there were four children born, which all lived a day. Their aggregate weight was eleven pounds fourteen ounces. In Glastonbury, (Ct.,) triplets were born, whose united weights was eighteen pounds. Still-born children are generally heavier than those born alive. There is about as much variety in the length of a fcetus born at the full time, as in its weight. Roedere, from his examination, concludes that the average length of a male is twenty inches and a third, and that of a fe- male nineteen inches and seventeen eighteenths. Dr. Dewees once delivered a child that measured 27 inches. Both the weight and length, and general dimensions of the fcetus will be more or less dependent upon the age and vigor of the mother, her mode of life, the diseases to which she may have been subject, and probably the climate in which she fives. 1 Beck's Med. Juris., 253. In drawing inferences relative to the maturity of the fcetus from its length, a good deal of reliance is placed upon the rela- tive position of the centre of the body. The greater the relative length of the superior over the inferior parts of the body, the younger and more immature the fcetus. The equilibrium be- DELIVERY. HI tween the upper and lower parts generally occurs at the time of birth, at which time the navel will be at the middle of the body or nearly so. lb. 252. The characters that mark the maturity of the child are the following as quoted from Fodere & Capuron, by Dr. Beck and Dr. Guy. 1 Beck's. Med. Juris., 253 ; Guy's Principles of For- ensic Med., 212. The abihty to cry as soon as the child reaches the atmospheric air, or shortly thereafter, and also to move its limbs with facility, and more or less strength ; the body being of a cleai red color ; the mouth, nostrils, eyelids, and ears per- fectly open ; the bo^es of the cranium possessing some solidity, and the fontanelles not far apart ; the hair, eye brows, and nails perfectly developed ; the free discharge of the urine and meco- nium in a few hours after birth ; and finally, the power of swal • lowing and digesting, indicated by its seizing the nipple, or a finger placed in its mouth. The signs of immaturity are the following : The length and volume of the infant much less than those of an infant at full term : it does not move its members, and makes only feeble motions ; it seems unable to suck, and has to be fed artificially ; its skin is of an intense red color, and traversed by numerous bluish vessels ; the head is covered with down, and the nails are not formed ; the bones of the head are soft, and the fontanelles widely separated ; the eyelids, mouth and nostrils are closed ; it sleeps continually, and must be preserved by artificial heat ; and lastly, it discharges its urine and meconium imper- fectly, and often after a long interval. As additional signs of immaturity, may be mentioned the presence of the membrana pupillaris, the position of the centre of the body already mentioned, the non-descent of the testicles from the abdomen, the large size of the head as compared with the body, the great prominence and deep red color of the parts of generation, and the total absence or scanty deposit of sebace- ous matter on the skin. Guy's Principles of Forensic Medicine, 212. 9. An enquiry into the state necessary to enable a new bom infant to inherit, including the question of viability. 112 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. To enable the infant to succeed to property according to the Roman law, it was necessary that it should be perfectly alive. An old French law ordained that it should live an hour, and be able to see the four walls and ceiling of the chamber before it could inherit. It was subsequently altered, directing that it should cry. The present French law simply directs, that in or der to succeed it must be born viable, and the word life, or being born alive, is construed to mean complete and perfect respira- tion. In England, the question of life or death at birth, and of ability to inherit at birth, arises frequently in those cases where a man claims as tenant by the curtesy of England. This is denned by Blackstone and substantially by Coke, to be " where a man marries a woman, seised of an estate of inheri- tance, and has by her, issue born alive, which was capable of inheriting her estate. In this case he shall, on the death of his wife, hold the lands for his life, as tenant by the curtesy of Eng- land." 2 Blackstone's Com., 127. This feature has also been adopted into American Jurispru dence, in those States where the English common law has been adopted as the law of the land. It forms a part of the Juris- prudence of this State. The most important question that has arisen under this, is as to what constitutes being born alive. Some have said it must be heard to cry, but this is a mistake. Crying, indeed, says Black- stone, is the strongest evidence of its being born alive ; but it is not the only evidence. Coke says, " if it be born alive it is suf- ficient, though it be hot heard to cry, for peradventure it may be born dumb. It must be proved that the issue was alive ; for mortuus exitus, non est exitus ; so the crying is but a proof that the child was born alive, and so is motion, stirring and the like. Coke's Institutes, lib. 1, Chap. 4, §35-30 a. These doc- trines are sustained in Dyer's Reports, 25, and in Fame's Case, reported in 8 Coke's Reports. In the case of Fish or Fisher vs. Palmer, tried in the Court of Exchequer, at Westminster Hall, in 1806, the question arose di- rectly whether the infant was still born at birth. The physician DELIVERY. 113 who was deceased at the time of the trial, had declared an horn before the birth that the child was alive, and a warm bath hav- ing been prepared under his directions, the child, when born, was given to the nurse to be immersed in it. It neither cried, nor moved, nor showed any symptoms of life ; but while in the water, there twice appeared a twitching and tremulous motion of the lips. Upon being informed of that, the physician directed the attendants to blow into its throat, but no other signs of life were ever exhibited. The facts thus presented led to considerable discussion. Two physicians give it as their opinion that the twitching and tremu- lous motion could not have happened, had the vital principle been quite extinct, and they, therefore, inferred that the child was alive. Dr. Denman thought the child was not alive. He drew a distinction between uterine and extra-uterine life, and attributed the motion to the remains of the former. The jury empanneled to try the case found that the child was born alive. This decision has elicited considerable discussion. Its correct- ness has been very properly questioned on sound physiological grounds. These convulsive motions, it has been said, merely show that the muscular fibre has not yet lost its contractility. Even still born infants are sometimes observed to open their mouths, and extend their arms and legs. It has been suggested that it may be merely the relaxation of a contracted muscle, or the stimulus of the atmospheric air on a body unaccustomed to it. 1 Beck's Med. Juris., 260. The looseness of the law on this subject was very extensively discussed, on an appeal to the Minister of Justice in France, by Chaussier . He dwelt on the insufficiency of the signs relied upon ; that the pulsation at the umbilical cord, and the spouting of Wood from it when cut, only proved the fluidity of the blood and that some action was left in the vessel. That the evacuation of the meconium should not be deemed a sign of life, nor does he admit the position of Lord Coke, that the deaf and dumb can- not cry, but he asserts that experience and observation show that they do cry when perfectly alive. He insists that the proofg- of life in disputed cases should be positive and manifest, such as- S 114 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. the high red color and warmth of the skin ; a free and full res- piration, sharp and continued crying, a motion of the heart and limbs, and these continuing for some time. See 1 Beck's Medical Juris., 261 -2. The Scotch law absolutely requires, that, as a proof that the child was born alive, it shall be heard to cry ; and in one case, where the child breathed, raised one eyelid, and expired in the usual convulsions about half an hour after its birth, but was not heard to cry, it was decided that the tenancy by the curtesy was not made out. 1 Beck's Med. Juris., 362. In a case which occurred at Turin, in 1818, the Csesarian operation was performed after the death of the mother, the child was still alive, but died at the end of thirteen minutes, and A?as not opened. The facts evidencing life Avere, that motion of its legs and feet were discovered during, and after the operation ; it opened its hands, which were closed ; blood sprung out of the umbilical cord on being cut, and pulsations were felt in the cord, the carotid arteries, and region of the heart ; water being poured on its head in administering baptism, a motion of the lips and mouth was perceived, and an impression which produced an in- spiration ; the natural heat remained ; after having lived about thirteen or fourteen minutes, some drops of blood came from its nose, it became pale, stretched its limbs, closed its eyes and died. A commission named by the faculty of Strasburgh, found no difficulty in this case, in finding that the child lived a life which rendered it capable of succeeding ; that the operation had rendered it thus capable, and that it had really breathed. 1 Beck's Med. Juris., 263. A case somewhat involving this question, occurred in this State, in 1830 — the case of Marselis vs. Thalhimer, reported in ■2 Paige, 35. The question related to the disposition of proper- ty, as between the widow and the heirs of the deceased husband. She claimed one-third, under the statute of distribution, and the remainder as heir of her child, which was born two months after the death of the husband, which was full grown but had never breathed. It was claimed that a child in ventre sa mere was a life in being, both as regarded its own benefit and that of DELIVERY. ] 15 other persons ; and that, upon establishing the fact of birth, the legal presumption was, that it was born alive, until the contrary appeared. The court decided against any legal presumption of life at birth, laying down the doctrine, that the existence of life at birth was a fact which, like any other, should be proved by the party seeking to claim any benefit from it ; that the evidence given before the surrogate did not prove that the child was born alive, and that prior to birth, the presumption of life in the child was merely for its own benefit, and contingent upon its subsequent birth alive, and that the rights of others must remain unaffected, no such presumption existing in their favor. In connexion with this subject, should be briefly considered the question of viability, (as the French term it,) that is, the earliest period of gestation after which a child is considered capable of living, or sustaining an independent existence. This means " an aptitude for extra-uterine life, characterized by the ma- turity of the infant, the good conformation of the principal organs of the economy, and the healthy state of those organs at the epoch of birth." The true question presented in any enquiry of this character, is the earliest period of gestation at which a child has been born, and has survived its birth so long as to prove that there was no physical obstacle to its attaining the kdult age. Guy's Principles of Forensic Medicine, 209 - 10. If a child survive its birth a week or ten days, that may fair- ly be considered as evidencing the fact that it was born viable. It is universally admitted, that a child may be born at the seventh month of utero-gestation, and live to manhood. It has been supposed by many, that the chance of living is greater at seven than it is at eight months of gestation. But recent expe- rience seems to contradict this. 1 Beck's Med. Juris., 257. The difficulty, therefore, can only exist in reference to periods of time anterior to six months. It is now considered a safe posi- tion to take, that a viable child cannot be born before five calen- dar months, or one hundred and fifty days after conception. Guy's Principles of Forensic Medicine, 210 ; 1 Becks Med. Juris., 255. There are., some extraordinary instances, in which it is said 116 MEDIC \L JURISPRUDENCE. ehildren have been born at an earlier period of gestation, and yet been reared. Fortunio Liceti was said to be born at four and a half months, and to haye lived to the age of eighty years. Such cases are not perfectly reliable, as a mistake may have been made in the calculations. A very extraordinary case is men- tioned by Dr. Rodman, (the particulars of which are given in Guy, 213,) in which the mother was delivered of a living male infant, and, as she was confident, at less than nineteen weeks from the time of conception. Neither its weight, nor the length of its body, could be ascertained until it was three weeks old- It was then found to be thirteen inches in length, and weighed one pound and thirteen ounces. At the age of four months, its functions were all regular, and at five was doing well. A case is also related by Dr. Outrepont, of Bamberg, the particulars of which are also to be found in Dr. Guy, 215-16, in which, a,s was pretty clearly ascertained, the child was born at the expira- tion of twenty-five weeks after conception. Dr. Francis has given an instance of a male foetus, born at the twentieth week of gestation, which lived one hour, and weighed one pound six drachms ; its length being ten inches. He also gives another cage of a foetus born in the twenty-third week of pregnancy, which survived. The means resorted to for the pur- pose of rearing children of early birth, makes probably some difference in the numbers who survive. 10. What are the signs and indications of the life or death of the child before or' during delivery 1 i This may become an important enquiry, where the succession to an inheritance is questioned, or where, in a criminal proceed- ing,the object is to punish for maltreating a pregnant woman, by means of which her offspring is supposed to have died. It is also impprtant, in its bearing upon the subjects of Abortion and Infanticide. The three great facts from which the life of the foetus is in fcrred during pregnancy, are — 1 . The good health of the mother : 2. The progressive increase of the abdomen in size : 3. From the motion of the foetus, either as exr«»neneed by DELIVEHY. 117 the mother, or ascertained in any of the ways heretofore alluded to. Each and all these may he deceptive, as will be apparent to any one who properly understands the signs and indications of pregnancy. The evidence of life during delivery is also lacking in the elements of certainty. The proofs enumerated as relied upon for that purpose are, 1. The limpidity of the waters : 2. The regularity of the pains, and their gradual increase in strength : 3. The pulsation of the heart and umbilical cord Of the foetus, or the pulsation at the anterior fontanelle : 4. The swelling, tension,, and elasticity of the presenting part. These, taken all together, are considered as furnishing strong evidence of life during delivery ; although separately, they are comparatively of little value. 1 Beck's Med. Juris., 234. In regard to the indications of the death of the fcetus, re- ference must be had to the causes that may have produced it, such as the general state of health and condition of the mother ; the excesses of which she may have been guilty ; the passions to which she may have been subject, and the good or bad influences that may have been brought to' bear upon her. The signs of death during pregnancy are, 1. A want of motion in the child, the uterus feeling as if it contained a dead weight : 2. The navel is less prominent than it should be : 3. The milk recedes, and the breasts become flaccid : 4. The mother feels a sense of lassitude and coldness, accom- panied with headache and nausea. 1 Beck's Med. Juris., 235. These may all prove more or less deceptive, and separately are of little force. The marked presence of. them all would be regarded as furnishing a very clear indication. The death of the fcetus sometimes occurs without exciting any general or local disturbance; the health of the mother remaining good, and nothing to excite suspicion except the suspension of the ordinary proofs of progressive pregnancy. Auscultation may here be practiced generally with success by those who'lia^e a correct 118 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. understanding of it. The pulsation of the foetal heart would clearly settle the question in favor of life, but the absence of any evidence of it would not so clearly indicate death. When the fcetus is actually dead and long detained in the uterus, putrefaction generally takes place. In such case the membranes loose their vitality, and blackish fetid discharges are present. The signs during the progress of delivery of the death of the fcetus are, 1 . Absence of motion and fetid discharges : 2. An cedematous or emphysematous feel of the presenting part : 3. The skin is soft and easily torn : 4. The bones of the cranium lose their natural connexion and vacillate on one another : 5. The umbilical cord is found without pulsation and some- times withered and rotten. 1 Beck's Med. Juris., 236-7. The medical jurist should, however, be cautious and not pro nounce hastily upon the sufficiency of these proofs. Dr. Blun- dell conceives that none should be relied upon except the three following : 1 . The cuticle coming away from the head in large flakes, de- squamating as from dead bodies : 2. The bones of the cranium being detached from each other, and floating, as it were, in the mollified brain : 3. The umbilical cord cold, brown, flaccid, and destitute of pulsation for half an hour or an hour. These three ought certainly to be regarded as furnishing clear if not conclusive evidence of death, during the progress of de- livery. 11. Delivery after the death of the mother and Csesarian ope- ration. This is an operation by which a fcetus is extracted from the uterus of the mother through a wound, made for that purpose, in the abdomen. It has generally been supposed to be termed Csesarian, from the circumstance that to it Julius Ceesar is said to have owed his life. This operation is more generally per- DELIVERY. 119 formed on the eastern continent, particularly in France, than in England or this country. The life of the woman there is not always sacrificed. But it generally is in England and this country 1 Paris fy Fonblanque's Med. Juris., 275-6, 7. Indeed the operation both here and in England, is seldom or never resorted to, unless in case of the death of the mother, or in desperate cases where her death is inevitable. How long after her death the child may survive in utero is an unsettled que3tio». Twenty-four or even forty-eight hours have been mentioned, but the more sensible writers affix to that statement simply a note of admiration ! Ibid, 280. The legal effect of the Caesarian section in England and in this country, when performed, as it most generally is, upon the dead mother, is that it destroys the tenancy by the curtesy. One condition of that is that the issue must be born during the life of the mother, and therefore, says the great commentator, if the mother dies in labor, and the Caesarian operation is performed, the husband in this case shall not be tenant by the curtesy : Because at the instant of the mother's death, he was clearly not entitled, as having no issue born, but the land descended to the child while he was yet in Ms mother's womb ; and the estate, being once so vested, shall not afterwards be taken from him. Hence, in a reference out of chancery to the justices in the case of one Reppes, of Northumberland, upon whose wife the Caesarian operation was performed, she having died in labor, they resolved that he should not be tenant by the curtesy, for it ought to begin by the birth of the issue, and be consummated by the death of the wife. 2 Blackstone's Com., 128 ; 2 Paige's Rep., 35. In 1 Beck, 264, a case is related of a wife who died of a violent illness in the seventh month of gestation. A quarter of an hour after her death an infant was taken from her by the Caesarian operation. The father claimed to be its heir. The point was, whether the child was alive when it was extracted. The proof was, that after its extraction it was carried into a cold cellar, that it had opened its eyes, and made some slight motions. Zacchias was consulted in the case, and gave it as his opinion that the child was alive when extracted ; that the inotions ob- 120 MEDICAL JUK.ISPKUDE1S-CE. served were mechanical, and the effect of the cold air upon the body. The decision was given in conformity with this opinion. 12. In case of the death of the mother, what are the signs and indications of delivery that may be revealed by dissection 1 The appearances presented on dissection will of course vary much according to the period of time intervening between de- livery and the post-mortem examination. The attention will of course be directed almost exclusively to the uterus and its ap- pendages. Should the examination take place immediately after delivery, the changes will be great and easily perceptible. The uterus is found resembling a large flattened pouch from nine to twelve inches long, its mouth open, its parieties soft and relaxed, its cavity containing coagulated blood, and its internal surface covered with the remains of the decidua. The marks of the attachment of the placenta are often visible, and are known by exhibiting a dark color, so much so as to resemble gangrene. The vessels of the uterus, especially that part to which the pla- centa was attached, are very large and numerous. The uterine appendages, the fallopian tubes, round ligaments, and surface of the ovaria are extremely vascular, so much so, that they have a purplish appearance. The spot from which the ovum escaped is more vascular than the rest of the ovarian surface. This state of these appendages continues until the return of the uterus to its unimpregnated state. 1 Beck's Med. Juris., 216 ; Guy's Prin- ciples of Forensic Medicine, 119; Montgomery's Signs of Preg- nancy, 314. When time has been suffered to elapse after the delivery, and before the examination takes place, changes wilL be found to have occurred in the uterus proportioned to the length of that time and to the energy with which the organ may have exerted its contractile powers. An examination made within a day or two after a delivery at the full time, will find the uterus about seven or eight inches. long and four broad, its internal surface being vascular, and frequently presenting patches of a purplish color. Its substance is from an inch to an inch and an half thick, and of nearly the consistence of museular fibre. At the end of a week the uterus has diminished to a length of DELIVERY. 121 between five and six inches. After a fortnight it does not ex- ceed five inches in length. Its vascularity is also very much diminished, and the thickness of its parieties reduced about one- third. But this reduction is accompanied by a corresponding increase in density of structure, and the orifices of the vessels are much less distinct, and the color of the muscular substance is paler. These changes in the uterine system depend not only on the time that has been suffered to elapse after delivery, but also on the period of gestation at which the contents of the uterus have been expelled. In a delivery occurring, for instance, in the sixth month, the uterus will be found as small two or three days after it takes place, as it would at the end of two or three weeks at the full time. After the third week no examination of the uterus will be likely to afford much information. It requires about four weeks to elapse before the return of the uterus to its original unim- pregnated condition. But any alterations that may be observed to take place in it towards the conclusion of tins period, are too liable to have been induced by contingent causes, to allow of our attaching value to them as proofs of delivery. Montgomery's Signs of Pregnancy, 315 -16. In examining the ovaria the at- tention will of course be directed to the enquiry, whether a cor- pus luteum is to be found or not, as the actual finding of one or more of these bodies, is to be regarded as undoubted evidence of a conception having taken place. The discussion relative to these bodies was pretty fully gone into when on the subject of pregnancy. A valuable summary of many things connected with delivery is thus given by Dr. Montgomery. Montgomery's Signs of Preg- nancy, 317-18. 1. The signs of delivery are most distinct after the birth of »a full grown child, and least so, when the uterine contents have been expelled at an early period of pregnancy. 2. The proofs are more distinct in proportion to the recency of the delivery, and any examination made after the lapse of ten 122 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. days from the time of the delivery, is not likely to afford satis- factory information ; the most decisive signs, in general, disap- pearing within a week. 3. The third or fourth day, generally, presents the results of delivery very distinctly, the condition of the breasts being then most remarkable, from the active secretion of milk. 4. A first delivery is more easily detected than subsequent ones. 5. We cannot, safely, rely on any of the signs of delivery viewed separately, but, must consider them collectively, their mutual relation and correspondence with each other, and with the other collateral circumstances of the woman's case and his- tory. 6. The chief points of attention ought to be the state of the uterus, the external parts, and of the breasts. 7. There are certain physical signs which, when present, are sufficient to establish a negative decision ; such are, for instance, a perfect hymen, or an imperforated state of the parts. 8. But, on the other hand, a woman may have borne children and no one mark remain, by which the fact of delivery could be proved, after the lapse of even a few weeks. 9. A woman may be delivered while in a state of insensibility, or even during deep natural sleep ; so that her child may perish, merely from want of attention, and without any moral delin- quency on her part. 10. A woman may be naturally pregnant, and the life of her child ascertained, and yet, child birth may not occur ; the child perishing and being decomposed, before the time of delivery. This brings to a close the first class, including questions aris- ing out of the relations of sex. These questions were properly first considered, not only because many of them lay at the foun- dation of being, but because the problems involved in very many of them require first to be solved, before we can be adequately prepared to enter upon the topic that will first present itself in the next class, viz : the deeply interesting and important one of Infanticide. INFANTICIDE. 123 CLASS II. QUESTIONS ARISING OUT OF INJURIES INFLICTED UPON THE ORGANIZATION. The questions arising in this class can only be exceeded in the frequency of their occurrence, by their immense magnitude and importance. There is, probably, neither one of the classes, into which I have divided the general subject, that presents questions more interesting in themselves, or to the public, than this, or those which the public are more interested in having thoroughly understood. Among these, it will be proper to select for con- sideration, I. INFANTICIDE. The investigation of the questions included under this .head, very naturally succeeds the class of questions we have just been considering. Several of the topics we have already discussed, are clothed with an importance they would not otherwise possess, in consequence, simply, of the bearing they have on the subject of infanticide. The questions which arise here for discussion, will be perhaps the more advantageously considered, under the following heads : 1. The legal provisions in reference to this crime, and the bearing they have upon the points necessary to be investigated and determined : 2. At what period of gestation is the fcetus to be considered as endowed with life % 3. Has a fetus in utero been destroyed, and what are the proofs of it, as derived — 1 . From an examination of the reputed mother ; and, 2. From an examination of the fetus 1 The latter embracing two subjects of inquiry — 1. Whether it be a fetus that is really expelled 1 and, 2. If so, what is its probable age and cause of expulsion 1 4. What are the means by which abortion may be produced ' 124 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. 5. Has the child attained that size and degree of maturity which would enable it to maintain an independent existence 1 6. Was the child born alive 1 and what are the organs or sys- tems of vessels that can furnish proofs relative to this enquiry 1 7. What proofs are afforded by the circulating system 1 8. What proofs are derived from the respiratory system 1 9. What is the value, objections, and method of using the hydrostatic test 1 v 10. What inferences relative to life, are to be deduced from the state of the diaphragm, discharge of the meconium, and state of the bladder 1 11. If born alive, how long did the child survive its birth 1 12. How long has the child been dead 1 , 13. Is the child really that of the prisoner, the reputed mother 1 Has she been recently delivered, and how do the signs of delive- ry correspond as to time with the appearances exhibited by the child'? 14. What are the different modes by which the life of the child may have been destroyed 1 15. What are the various criminal modes usually resorted to for the purpose of destroying life, and the proofs that evidence them? 16. What are the natural or accidental modes by which the life of the child may have been destroyed 1 17. What are the principal points to which the attention should be drawn, and the most approved methods to be pursued in the making of examinations in cases of alleged infanticide 1 1. The legal provisions in reference to this crime, and the bearing they have upon the points necessary to be investigated and determined. It is a subject of deep interest to the student of general his- tory, or to any one desirous of acquainting himself with tfcft elements of human progress, to investigate the history of infaii' ticide, and enquire into the ideas and practices of different nar tions, ancient and modern, in reference to it. The prevalence of these ideas and practices; their universality among ancient, and generally among savage and barbarous nations ; the gradual INFANTICIDE. 125 entertainment of more and more correct ideas, as nations moie civilised and of more purely natural and elevated moral feelings have appeared and exerted their influence in the world's history; all point to this as an excellent barometer by which the feelings of men in different nations and ages may be tested, and their progress in reference to correctness of ideas and purity of feelings and principles ascertained. The limits I have prescribed to myself do not permit me to go into this history, but those who would feel an interest in such an enquiry may profitably refer to the very excellent chapter on Infanticide by John B. Beck, M. D., in 1 Beck's Med. Juris., 271, et seq. The same necessity of consulting brevity will compel me to omit all reference to the laws on this subject of ancient and modern nations, confining myself simply to a brief statement of the laws of England and this country. Blackstone thus states the English law on this subject. " If a woman is quick with child, and, by a potion, or otherwise, kill- eth it in her womb, or if any one beat her, whereby the child dieth in her body, and she is delivered of a dead child, tills, though not murder, was by the ancient law homicide or man- slaughter. But the modern law doth not look upon this offence in quite so atrocious a light, but merely as a heinous misdemeanor. But if the child be born alive, and afterwards die in consequence of the potion or beating, it will be murder." 1 Blackstone' s Com., 129, and note. In 1803 was passed what was called the Ellenborough act, which enacted in substance that any person wilfully and mali- ciously administering or taking any medicine, drug or substance, or using or causing to be used any instrument with intent to procure the miscarriage of any woman, not being, or not being proved to be quick with child at the time, and all counsellors, aiders and abettors, shall be declared guilty of felony, and be liable to fine, imprisonment, public whipping and transportation for a term not exceeding fourteen years. The same act also provided that if the same thing was done after quickening it should be punished with death. Other acts were subsequently passed, the last of whicb, viz., 1 Vict. Cap., 85, enacted that 126 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. whosoever with intent to procure the miscarriage of any woman, shall unlawfully administer to her or cause to be taken by her, any poison or other noxious thing, or shall unlawfully use any instrument, or other means whatsoever, with the like intent, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable, at the discretion of the court, to be transported beyond the seas, for the term of his or her natural life, or for any term not less than fifteen years, or to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding three years. It will be observed that by the provisions of this statute, the absurd distinction between women quick and not quick with child is not retained. The legislation of New- York, in reference to the causing or procuring abortion, is embraced in three sections, one of which provides substantially that the wilful administration to any preg- nant woman of any medicine or substance, or the employment of any instrument or other means with intent to procure mis- carriage, shall be punished by imprisonment in a county jail, not less than three months nor more than one year, Session Laws of 1845, 286, § 2. In this provision it will be perceived the dis- tinction of quick or not quick is omitted. Another provision embracing the case of a woman quick with child, and providing in the same terms against the administration of any medicine or substance, or the employment of any instru- ment or other means, with intent to destroy the child, and con- taining the exception of the necessity of the prescription or ope- ration to preserve the life of the mother, and provides, that in case of the death of the child, or of the mother, it shall be deemed manslaughter in the second degree, Session Laws of 1845, 28, § 1 ; the punishment for which is imprisonment in the state prison not less than four nor more than seven years. An additional section still provides that the wilful killing of an unborn quick child, by any injury to its mother, which would be murder if it resulted in her death, shall be manslaughter in the first degree, the punishment of which is imprisonment in the state prison for not less than seven years. These are the statute provisions of this state on the subject of INFANTICIDE. 127 abortion. The case of The People vs. Jackson, 3 Hill, 92, decides that under an indictment for producing an abortion of a quick child which is felony, the prisoner may be convicted though it turn out that the child was not quick, and the offence, therefore, a mere misdemeanor, as stated in the statutory provision first mentioned. The laws of Connecticut provide that the administering any noxious or destructive substance to procure the miscarriage of a woman quick with child, shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison during life, or for such other term as the court shall determine. Revised Laws of Connecticut, 1 52. The legal provision in Ohio, makes the same distinction in relation to the mother's being quick with child or not as the laws of New- York, and there is also the same exception contained in them, but the punishment inflicted is less severe. The laws against the murder of the new born infant are much more severe. In almost all civilized countries they inflict capi- tal punishment. In England an act was passed in the reign of James I. rendering the drowning or secret burying of an infant, which if born alive would have been a bastard, prima facie evi- dence of murder, and subjecting the mother to the penalty of t/eath, unless she could prove that the child was born dead. This cruel law was modified in 1803 by the passage of an act declaring that women tried for the murder of bastard children should be tried by the same rules of evidence and presumption as are allowed to take place in other trials of murder. Annexing, however, a penalty, or authorising the court to inflict one, in case of acquittal, upon the mother who was proved secretly to have buried, or otherwise endeavored to conceal, the birth of her child ; which penalty was the committing to gaol or the house of correction for any time not exceeding two years. In most or all the states of the Union trials for destroying the life of the new born infant are subject to the same rules and con- ducted on the same principles as trials for murder, and if found guilty the offender is subjected to the same penalty. The law upon broad general principles recognizes no difference between destroying a life that is capable of sustaining an independent 128 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. being, however early it may be in its career of existence, and taking away the same life at any subsequent period. All the attending circumstances, therefore, such as concealment of birth, secretly drowning or burying the body, would be so many facts going to show the criminal intent of the party; but such facts would not alone prove such intent, as they may be accounted for upon other reasons. Irrespective of the effect which the concealment of the birth or death of a bastard child has upon a trial for infanticide, such concealment itself has been made either a felony o gravity varies with the tempe- rature. If the water be too hot, it will expand the lungs and thus tend to make them float ; if too cold, it may contract the air cells, expel some of the air and thus give them a tendency to sink. Saline matters give the water a greater specific gravity, and im- part to it a buoyancy that the pure fresh water does not possess. 1 Beck's Med. Juris., 289. 5. Place the lungs, together with the heart, in the vessel of water, and observe whether they float or sink ; and if the former, whether above the surface of the water or under it ; and if the latter, whether they do so rapidly or gradually. 6. They should then be taken from the water, the pulmonary vessels tied, the lungs separated from the heart and weighed. 7. Next replace the lungs, without the heart, in the water, and see whether they float or sink, and in what way. 8. The two lobes should then be separated from each other. Each one of them should be subjected to the test in the same manner as both had been. It should be carefully noticed whether 170 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. there is any difference in their floating or sinking, and which, if dither, floats or sinks the most readily. 9. Each lobe should then be divided into a number of pieces, some of which should be taken more from the surface and others from the centre, taking care to keep separate the pieces from each lung. 10. While cutting into the lungs, care should be taken to ob- serve whether there be any crepitus, whether the pulmonary vessels are charged with blood ; or whether there be any traces of disease. 11. Subject each piece to the test, and observe whether they all float or sink, and whether readily or not, and keep separate those that do, from those that do not. 12. If any float, submit them to a firm pressure between the thumb and finger, or in a twisted cloth, or mould them with the thumb in the palm of the hand. Then replace them in the water and observe whether they still continue to float. 13. In all unskilful attempts to inflate the lungs of a child through the mouth, air is introduced in considerable quantity into the stomach. There should be, therefore, an examination of that organ, with the view of ascertaining whether there is in it any contained air. The absence of it would tend to prove that artificial inflation had not been practised. Guy's Principles of Forensic Medicine, \14t. 10. What inferences relative to life are to be derived from the state of the diaphragm, discharge of the meconium, and state of the bladder'? The state of the diaphragm is essentially modified by the act of respiration. Previous to .that act, it is found high up in the thorax. As soon as respiration commences, the dilated lungs require more room, and the cavity of the chest must necessarily enlarge itself in every direction. From being compressed and flattened, it becomes elevated and arched. The necessary con- sequence is, that internally the diaphragm descends. The best mode of measuring the elevation or depression of the diaphragm, is by the corresponding ribs. 1 Beck's Med. Juris., 391. The discharge of the meconium shortly after birth, if the child INFANTICIDE. 171 is born alive, affords another indication of life at birth. This is a dark, pitchy matter, contained in the intestinal canal of the fcetus. It is considered by many to be bile collected in the fcetal liver, and propelled from that organ into the intestinal canal by the compression sustained by the liver on the commencement of respiration. The same compression, it is supposed, afterwards expels it from the intestinal canal. It has been asserted, that there is no instance in which infants born at the end of the ninth month have ever suffered this evacuation previous to their birth, but there is at least one instance to the contrary, mentioned on the authority of Denman. Ibid, 391. As to the state of the bladder, it contains a considerable quan- tity of urine prior to birth. If found empty, it would raise a presumption that the child had been born alive, and had lived sufficiently long to pass its urine by its own efforts. This is not, however, deemed of much value. A child may possibly void its urine before birth, or it may be born alive and die before doing it. It would, therefore, be unsafe to place reliance upon that, especially when unattended by other proofs. 1 Beck's Med. Juris., 391 -2. 1 1 . If born alive, how long did the child survive its birth 1 The indications of the time which has intervened between the birth of the child and its death, are derived principally from the changes which take place in the organs of circulation, in the state of the umbilical cord, and in that of the skin. It may become desirable to ascertain this period of time in order to connect the deceased child with the supposed mother, or for other purposes included in the general investigation. The peculiarities of the fcetal circulation have already been briefly alluded to. It is principally in the gradual closure of the fcetal openings, which occurs on the change in the circulation which takes place at birth, that the proofs of this intervening period of time are to be sought. These changes will be noticed : 1. In the umbilical arteries and vein. The change in these becomes sooner manifested than in any other of the fcetal peculi- arities of circulation. The umbilical arteries, which are continu- ations of the iliacs, and whose office it is to carry the blood of 172 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. the foetus to the placenta, are the soonest obliterated. Still, their obliteration is gradual, and is accomplished by a continual dimi- nution in their caliber, and an increase in the thickness of their coats, more especially in the immediate neighborhood of the umbilicus. This is observable at the end of the first twenty four hours. At the end of two days, these changes extend from the umbilicus, embracing a greater part of the length of the arteries ; and at the end of the third day, reach nearly to their termination in the iliacs. The degree and extent of their obliteration will therefore afford some indications of the length of time the child has survived its birth. 1 Beck's Med. Juris., 343 ; Guy's Prin- ciples of Forensic Medicine, 177. The changes proceed somewhat slower in the umbilical vein, the office of which is to carry the blood from the placenta to the foetus. Very little change is observable in this during the first three days after birth, except that a slight contraction is noticed to take place. On the fourth day, this is more marked j and on the fifth, it is generally complete. Indications of the desired period of time may be collected from comparing the more rapid obliteration of the umbilical arteries with the slower obliteration of the vein. 2. The ductus venosus, the office of which is to convey a por- tion of the blood of the foetus directly from the umbilical vein to the ascending cava, and through that to the heart. The establish- ment of respiration so changes the circulation that this organ is soon found in a collapsed state and empty of blood. The period at which this change takes place is variable. In twenty infants who had lived three days, this duct was found empty and oblite- rated. 1 Beck's Med. Juris., 341 -2. The changes that take place in it are generally found to be the next that succeed those of the umbilical vein. 3. The ductus arteriosus. The office of this, in the foetal state, is to convey a large portion of the blood sent into the trunk of the pulmonary artery directly into the aorta. The succession of changes by which this becomes divested of blood and converted into a ligament, usually next succeeds those of the ductus veno sus. This succession has been made the subject of close ibves INFANTICIDE. 173 tigatiou by Professor Bernt, of Vienna, and hence is known as the Vienna test. The vessel itself is about half an inch in length, cylindrical, and as large as the pulmonary artery. According :o the observations of Professor Bernt, a very few respirations pro- duce the effect of destroying the shape of the vessel, and of causing it to contract towards the aorta. 1 Beck's Med. Juris., 339-40; Guy's Principles of Forensic Medicine, 178. It then assumes the shape of a truncated cone, the base of which is to- wards the pulmonary artery, and the apex towards the aorta; although he says sometimes the contrary of this is observed. If the child has survived its birth for some hours, or for a day, the cylindrical shape is again resumed, but very much diminished both in length and diameter. If life has continued for some days, or a week, the duct becomes wrinkled and shortened to the length of a few lines, while its diameter becomes diminished from the size of a goose quill to that of a crow quill. At the same time, there will be found to be a corresponding increase in the diameter of the branches of the pulmonary artery. At the eighth day, the duct is obliterated in half the children; and about the ninth or tenth, in all of them. Some experiments have been subsequently made by others, particularly by Orfila, with the view of testing the correctness of Professor Bernt's conclusions. In eight cases detailed by Or- fila, only four were found to present the appearances stated by Bernt. Considerable doubt is thus thrown upon the strict accu- racy of the Vienna test. Nevertheless, this duct ought to be examined whenever it becomes desirable to ascertain the pro- bable length of time the infant has survived its birth. 1 Beck's Med. Juris., 340-41 ; Guy's Principles of Forensic Medicine, 178. 4. The foramen ovale. This is a septum between the right auricle and the left, its office being to afford a passage for a part of the blood directly from, the right to the left auricle. This, in the great majority of cases, is the ftetal- opening that last closes. The time of its closure is found to be extremely variable. Its final closure leaves a depression called the fossa ovalis. In one out of eighteen infants of a day old, it was found closed. So, also, in four out of twenty-two of two days old ; in three out of 174 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. twenty-two of three days old ; and in two out of twenty-seVen of four days old. No precise period can be fixed for the oblite- ration of this aperture. It sometimes continues open for years, and there are some cases on record where it has never closed, and yet no dangerous consequences have resulted to the indi- vidual. Professor Bernt, of Vienna, has here also called the attention of medical jurists to a succession of changes, preceding its final closure, which he supposes will indicate the period the child has survived its birth. These changes consist principally in the position of the aperture of the foramen. Anterior to respiration, this is found at the lowest part of the valve. As soon as respi- ration commences, it is gradually turned towards the right. It moves upward on the right side, until, after revolving around the right edge of the valve, it is found at the upper instead of the lower side of it. Here it usually disappears. These changes, according to Bernt, not only indicate the existence of respira- tion, but also the different periods of time during which it has continued. Although there is, no doubt, something in this succession of changes, yet there is probably much less of regularity than is here stated ; and so much accuracy is required in order to de- rive any safe conclusions from them, that to the generality of physicians it must be possessed of little value. It may be, how- ever, useful in confirming other tests, and ought not, therefore, to be entirely disregarded. Beck's Med. Juris., 337-8 ; Guy's Principles of Forensic Medicine, 178. 5. The umbilical cord. This comprises the umbilical arteries and the umbilical vein. In the child recently born, the cord is fresh, firm, round, and of a bluish color. Its vessels contain blood, and its size varies according to the quantity of gelatinous fluid it contains. The changes which occur in it, and which in- dicate the longer or shorter continuance of life, are — 1 . The withering of the cord. This commences at the ligature, and gradually extends to the .umbilicus. The time of its com- mencement is various, sometimes beginning directly after birth, sometimes not until some hours have elapsed, but being rarely INFANTICIDE. 175 delayed longer than thirty hours, or two days, or at the farthest three days. Thus the withering of the cord takes place from the first to the third day alter birth. 2. The desiccation or drying of the cord. It first assumes a reddish brown color, becoming semi-transparent. It then ex- hibits a flattened, shriveled appearance, finally becoming trans- parent, and, of a color resembling parchment. Its vessels are obliterated, and it becomes tortuous and dry. The commence- ment of this process dates from one or two to four days after birth. The period at which it becomes complete varies from one to five days, the most usual period being three days. This desiccation is a vital process. This is inferred, because the portion of the cord beyond the ligature, which is attached to the placenta, does not desiccate, but decomposes and putrefies like any other dead matter ; and also, because the desiccation ceases as soon as life ceases ; because it does not desiccate at all in a foetus which is born dead ; and because, on the dead subject, the cord undergoes a real putrefaction, which is altogether different from this desiccation. 3. The separation or dropping off" of the cord. The period after birth at which this takes place is very various. From the fourth to the fifth day after birth, is the ordinary period at which the cord falls off, although it sometimes happens sooner and sometimes later. As a genera] rule, then, the cord withers during the first day ; desiccation commences at the end of the first, and is complete on the third day. Between the fourth and fifth days, the cord drops off. All this must of course be liable to nume- rous variations and exceptions. 1 Beck's Med. Juris., 346, et seq. ; Guy's Principles of Forensic Medicine, 178-9. It has also been remarked, that during the process of desiccation, there is a red or inflammatory circle formed around the umbilicus. This is regarded as the result of vital action, and hence as af- fording an indication that the child was born alive. It would seem, however, to be more frequently absent than present. I has also been present in still born children. It cannot, therefore, be regarded as furnishing much evidence either by its presence or absence. 176 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. 4. Cicatrization of the umbilicus. This is the last change which occurs, and. takes place usually from the tenth to the twelfth day. The general inferences to be drawn from this source are the fol- lowing. If the cord be found withered, the child must have lived from a few hours to three days ; if desiccated, from one to five days ; if it have fallen off, from one to seven days ; and if the umbilicus have cicatrized, from ten to twelve days. 1 Beck's Med. Juris., 348 - 9 ; Guy's Principles of Forensic Medicine, 179. Another source of proofs indicating the length of time the child may have survived its birth is derived from changes in the skin. There is a process of exfoliation of the epidermis which commen- ces on the abdomen, and extends from thence successively to the chest, groins, axillse, intercapular space, limbs, and finally to the hands and feet. The skin sometimes comes off in layers or scales, and sometimes in the form of a dust. This process va- ries in the time of its commencement, and also in its progress! It sometimes begins when the child is but a day old, and occa- sionally is delayed until the third or fourth day. It continues sometimes for thirty days, and, often in feeble and delicate children for two months. It is a vital process, differing from the separation of cuticle, which occurs as a consequence of putre- faction. Guy's Principles of Forensic Medicine, 179 -80. The following is a brief summary of the appearances that may be expected to be presented during some of the first days next succeeding the birth, and which indicate the period of time which has elapsed since that event. After twenty-four hours. Skin firm and pale, or less red 1 than at birth. Umbilical cord somewhat shriveled. Meconium dis- charged. Lungs generally more or less distended with air. Um- bilical vessels, ductus venosus, ductus arteriosus and foramen ovale all open. From the second to the third day. Skin possesses a yellowish tinge, epidermis sometimes appearing cracked, a change which precedes exfoliation. Umbilical cord brown and withered. From the third to the fourth day. Skin more yellow, evident exfoliation of the cuticle on the chest and abdomen; Cord desic- cated, of a brownish red color, flattened, semi-transparent and INFANTICIDE. , 177 twisted, sometimes the red or inflammatory circle around the umbilicus. But this has been met with in children still born. From the fourth to the sixth day. Cuticle separating in the form of minute scales, or of a fine powder. Umbilical cord separating from the abdomen usually on the fifth day. The process of sepa- - ration is — that the membranous coverings become first detached, then the arteries and afterwards the veins. The fcetal openings, the ductus venosus, ductus arteriosus, foramen ovale and um- bilical vessels in the majority of cases found closed. From the sixth to the twelfth day. Cuticle desquamating on the extremities, cicatrization of the umbilicus generally complete by the tenth day after birth. There is sometimes an oozing of mu- cus from the cord which retards the formation of the cicatrix. Taylor's Med. Juris., 380-81. From all this we may be safe, perhaps, in deriving the follow- ing inferences. 1. That the closure of the fcetal openings, or of any one of them, is clear proof that the child was born alive, and had con- tinued to live for some hours at least, and more than one day. 2. Their being found open affords no proof that the child was born dead. 3. From the succession of changes noticed in the closing of the ductus arteriosus and the foramen ovale, from the different appearances exhibited by the cord, and from the changes which take place in the skin, some conclusions may safely be drawn as to the length of time the child has survived its birth ; although from the great variations noticed in these changes, it will be im- possible to fix the time with any precision, or to make any other than general statements in reference to it. 12. How long has the child been dead 1 It may become important to settle this question in reference to the reputed mother. Suppose it ascertained that she was deliver- ed at a certain known time, the time a child had been dead, taken in connection with the period, if any, that had elapsed between its birth and death, would become a material question to settle. The question last under investigation can only be settled by a reference to the changes that take place jnthe Hving body ; the pre- 12 178 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. sent, by reference to those which occur in a body divested of life. The solution of this question involves the examination of the putrefactive process. This will be made a subject of sepa- rate discussion hereafter, and to that discussion reference must be had in the settlement of this question. All the causes, heat, humidity, access to air, that conspire to hasten on the putrefactive process in the adult, produce the same effect on the body of the infant. It has been remarked that the body of the infant putrefies more rapidly than that of the adult. It parts with its animal heat very fast, and the rigidity which fol- lows is as great, and lasts as long in the infant, as in the adult. Accurate experiments are yet wanting to determine the length of time occupied by the several steps of the putrefactive process, in infants and adults respectively. All that can safely be said now on this subject is — that, other things being equal, the pu trefactive process is more rapid in infant, than adult bodies, and this should be taken into consideration in any question of this kind that may be presented. Guy's Principles of Forensic Medi- cine, 183; Taylors Med. Juris., 381. 13. Is the child really that of the prisoner, the reputed mo- ther ? Has she been recently delivered, and how do the sign' of delivery correspond, as to time, with the appearances ex- hibited by the child 1 The answer to the second question would furnish some means of answering the first. Most, or all of the subjects of enquiry involved in the second, have already been made matters of disr cussion, and need not be here repeated. In reference to the first question, the attention should be di- rected to ascertaining the duration of the pregnancy, and com- paring this with the probable age of the fcetus, No mere exami- nation will be likely to acquaint one with the duration of preg- nancy. To ascertain that, the probable age of the foetus should be compared with the appearances the female exhibits, and the account given by her of its duration. The nature of the delivery may also be enquired into with the view of ascertaining whether it was natural or laborious. If the latter, there might be marks of injury upon the child. The re- INFANTICIDE. 179 ported age of the infant should be compared with the changes, which the parts of the reputed mother may have undergone since her delivery, to ascertain as to their agreement or disagreement. Its probable age may also be compared with the state of the gen- ital organs of the mother as to marks of injury or recent delivery. Watson on Homicide, 284 - 5. There may be also circumstances of a moral nature involved in this enquiry, with which the medi- cal jurist, as such, has no concern. 14. What are the diiferent modes by which the life of the child may have been destroyed 1 This question assumes that several previous ones have been proved. It assumes that an infant, divested of life, is produc- ed ; that its birth is ascertained, so far as to connect it with its mother, whose conduct in relation to it whether innocent or criminal is the subject of investigation. It assumes also that proof has been furnished that it was born alive, otherwise no oc- casion would exist of enquiry into the modes by which its life may have been destroyed. This, therefore, is one of the last en- quiries presented in infanticide. These modes of death may be very various, but they may all be ranged under two classes, viz., those which are criminal and those which are accidental. As it may, in every case, be neces- sary to discriminate to which of these two the death is owing, it becomes important to examine both somewhat in detail. 15. What are the various criminal modes usually resorted to for the purpose of destroying life, and the proofs that evidence them? Some of these modes are unattended with any external appear- ances indicating a resort to violence. In such cases as there is nothing clearly indicating a resort to destructive means, it may, and more probably will, be impossible for the medical witness to say whether the death was brought about intentionally or not. Such, for instance, is 1. Suffocation. Here, slight changes only will be effected. All that is commonly noticed is lividity about the head and face, and slight congestion in the lungs. This mode of death may occur either prior to respiration or subsequent to it. A child may be 180 MEDICAL JURISPKCDENCE. born so enveloped in the membranes as to be suffocated before it is liberated, and where for many minutes, it has shown strong signs of life. So, also, immediately on being born, it may faH into the midst of discharges, or on a soft bed, or may be prevented by some similar obstacle from breathing at all. An infant, especially prior to respiration, may be easily destroyed by suffo- cation. So also after the commencement of respiration, and when the pulmonary tests may show the establishment of that function, life may be destroyed by suffocation, which may be either acci- dental or intentional. The child after breathing, may fall into fluid discharges, or be overlaid in bed, or have its mouth ob- structed by accumulations of mucus, and thus its death, from suffocation, may innocently occur. So also its death may crimi- nally be brought about by placing wet cloths over its mouth, or thrusting them into it, or by allowing the child to remain closely compressed under the bed clothes, or by its head being thrust into straw, feathers, or such substances. An examination ought always to be made of the mouth and fauces to ascertain if any foreign substances, such as wool, straw, feathers, &c, are to be found there sufficient to indicate the cause of death. In the case of the Queen vs. Mortiboys, tried in 1841, the body was discovered in a box containing wool, was lying on its abdomen with its face raised and mouth open, a small quantity of fine flocks of wool was found in its mouth, and a comforter had been passed twice round the neck, having been tied the second time in a single knot over the chin. The ligature had produced no mark around the neck either externally or internally. The brain was con- gested. The pulmonary tests showed respiration or inflation of the left lung. Death was referred to obstructed respiration, caused partly by the ligature, and partly by the wool, but prin- cipally by the latter. The prisoner was acquitted. Taylor's Med. Juris., 385-6. 2. Drowning. A woman may cause herself to be delivered in a bath, the child being forcibly retained under water until its life was extinct. In such case no evidence of the mode of death would be found upon the body. If the drowning be subsequenl INFANTICIDE. 181 to the commencement of respiration, then precisely the same questions will present themselves, as in the case of persons found dead from drowning, and the same indications of death, from that cause, are to be sought for in the organism of infants as in those of adults. These questions and indications are subsequent- ly discussed. 3. Cold. Death from cold, as we shall see hereafter, leaves few traces' upon the organization. The evidence is mostly circum- stantial. The situation in which the body is found, the season of the year, the temperature of the air, &c, are all matters to be considered. The body should be examined to ascertain if ' there is not some other cause of death to be found. A new born infant is no doubt more easily affected by a low temperature than an adult, and its death is, therefore, more readily effected by ex- posure to cold. Taylor's Medical Jurisprudence, 387 ; 1 Beck's Med. Juris., 397. 4. Starvation. It is not clearly settled how long a new born in- fant is enabled to exist without food. Foedere says the neglect of it for twenty-four hours is not unattended with danger. This mode of death necessarily implies that life has been for some time enjoyed, and in this case, therefore, all the tests that go to es-. tabiish the fact of life, should be resorted to in the first place. The signs of death by starvation are the same in the infant as in the adult, and will, therefore, find a more appropriate place for consideration hereafter. Generally starvation will also be found accompanied with exposure, but whether they are wilful or ac- cidental will be a question of fact for the jury. Taylor's Med Juris., 387 ; 1 Beck's Med. Juris., 397-8. 5. Wounds, fractures and injuries of various lands. Under this head is included a very numerous class of agencies, which are probably among those the most frequently resorted to for the pur- pose of destroying the life of the new born child. In case wounds, contusions or other injuries are found upon the body of the child, the same questions substantially will arise, as in the case of per- sons found dead from that cause. Some additional questions arise, growing out of the peculiarity of the case. One of these is, whether the injury ->ccurred in the course of labor. Until 182 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. quite recently the general supposition has been, that fractures of the cranium in new born children were always indicative of violence. It was not supposed possible that there existed any cause, prior to delivery, that could produce such an effect. It is now, however, well settled that fracture of the bones of the cranium may be produced during labor. A case is related by Siebold, of a woman with a very narrow pelvis, who was de- livered by the efforts of nature alone, of a well formed still born female infant, having three fissures in the left parietal bone, and one in the left frontal bone. Michaelis also reports the case of a woman with a well formed pelvis, who was delivered of a child alive at birth, but which expired shortly afterwards, and on the right parietal bone, which during birth had been diverted under the promontory of the sacrum, there were found no less than five fractures. A number of cases of fractures that occurred during labor, are collected by Dr. Schworer, and altogether a sufficient number have been observed to establish clearly the possibility of their occurrence. Taylor's Med. Juris., 389 ; Guy's Principles of Forensic Med., 190. The fractures, thus arising, are generally observed to be slight, commonly presenting merely the appearance of a fissure in the bone, usually commencing at the sutures and extending down- ward for about an inch or less into the body of the bone. They are accompanied with extravasation of blood in the same manner as fractures produced after birth. The question that will here occur is, whether there are any points of distinction that will enable the medical jurist to discriminate between those which oc- cured during delivery, and those which were produced at a sub- sequent period. No very satisfactory answer can be given to this question. No other difference can be expected than one in de- gree ; these fractures, as already remarked, being generally slight, and those which are the result of violence, inflicted with the in- tent to kill, being usually much more severe, extensively lace- rating the scalp ; the bones being driven in, and the brain pro- truded. A question, however, may arise whether even the latter class of injuries, may not have arisen from the suddenness of the la INFANTICIDE. 183 bor, the expulsion of the foetus by the violent contractions of the uterus, so that its head coming in contact with a hard sub- stance, as the floor or pavement, may have thus been the inno- cent cause of their production. In order that such a result should be brought about, it is important, if not necessary, that the wo- man should be delivered while in the erect posture. Although this is by no means common, yet there are instances of its oc- curring, sufficient certainly, to establish the possibility of it. The question of its possibility occurred in a case mentioned in the American Journal of Medical Science, vol. 17, p. 329, in which there was a contrariety in the medical testimony upon that point. As it, however, appeared that instances of that kind of delivery had actually been witnessed, no doubt seems to have been enter- tained but that it was a possible occurrence and might, therefore, take place. Many cases of that kind are mentioned by writers. See Guy, 188 ; Ryan, 142, &c. From the numerous experiments and great number of cases collected by Dr. Klein, it would seem that fractures of the crani- um, under, these circumstances, must be of very rare occurrence, He reports one hundred and eighty-three cases, in which the women were rapidly delivered while sitting, standing, or inclined on the knees, the child falling either on the ground floor, or on bare boards, or the pavement, and yet out of the whole number, there was only one instance in which the child was killed, and, so far as could be ascertained by external examination, there was no case in which the bones of the cranium were fissured or fractured. Of these instances one hundred and fifty were de- livered standing. He asserts that there was not one infant in the kingdom of Wurtemburgh, who had experienced this acci- dent Whose skull was fractured, and that all recovered. Ryan's Med. Juris., 142 ; Guy's Principles of Forensic Medicine, 189-90. The experiments made by Chaussier upon the dead bodies of children would seem to lead to a different conclusion. Fifteen still-born children were allowed to fall perpendicularly, and head foremost from a height of eighteen inches on a stone floor. In twelve of the number one or other of the parietal bones was broken. The fractures were greater in proportion as the lengtb 184 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. of fall was increased. There are two points of difference in the two cases. In the first the direction in which the body is pro- jected is more oblique, and the fall is not so instantaneous. Whether these are sufficient to explain the difference in the result or not, it is perhaps difficult to say ; but as the cases col- lected by Dr. Klein are precisely those in which the question would arise in trials for infanticide, they will have much more confidence attached to them than the experiments of Chaussier. It will follow then that instances in which fractures occur from this cause are very rare, although the possibility of their occur- rence is clearly established. Whenever a suspicion that this may have been the cause of death exists, examination should be had into the circumstances both anterior and subsequent. The volume of the infant's head may be compared with the dimen- sions of the pelvis. The duration of the labor should, if possible, be ascertained ; the position of the woman when the infant was expelled ; the height of the fall ; the substance with w T hich the head might have come in contact ; and particularly the state of the umbilical cord, which, in such a case, ought to be ruptured either at the placenta or umbilicus, and not in the middle, while its extremity should present the sign of laceration. Ryan's Med. Juris., 142 - 3. The somewhat peculiar requirements of the law have thrown considerable embarrassment in the way of medical testimony. According to the decisions in the English courts a child is not considered living in law, so that its destruction can be murder, until its body is entirely born. Taylor's Med. Juris., 388. Several cases on this point are collected in Taylor, 377. In Rex vs. Brain, it was held that a child must be wholly in the world in a living state to be the subject of murder. In Rex vs Sellis, Mr. Justice Coltman held, that to justify a conviction for child murder, the jury must be satisfied that the entire body of the child was actually in the world in a living state, when the violence was offered to it. This doctrine is perhaps more clearly expressed by Baron Parke in a case of infanticide tried in 1841, reported in Guy's Hospital Reports, April, 1842. He charged the grand jury that " with respect to all cases of infanticide, there INFANTICIDE. 185 Is a degree of doubt whether the infant has been born alive. The law requires that this should be clearly proved, and that the whole body of the child should have come from the body of the parent. If it should appear that death was caused during de- livery, then you will not find a true bill." It should be here, however, remarked, that the law regards the time at which the death occurred, in fixing the character of the crime, and not that at which the act was committed. The following case reported in Archhold, 345, will illustrate this. A man by the name of Senior was tried in 1832 for manslaughter, in killing an infant by inflicting injuries on it at its birth. The evidence showed that when the head of the child presented, the prisoner, who practiced midwifery, by some mismanagement, fractured, and otherwise so injured the cranium, that it died immediately after it was born. The point was here taken that as the child was not born at the time the wounds and injuries were inflicted, the prisoner could not be guilty. The judge held that as the child was born alive and died, the case might be one of manslaughter. This opinion was afterwards sustained by the other judges. Thus the criminality is made to depend upon the period at which the injuries proved fatal, and not upon the period at which they were inflicted upon the body of the child. It must be easily seen that it will be difficult, if not impossible, for a medical witness to satisfy an enquiry as to whether the whole body of the infant was born or not at the time of the in- fliction of the injury ; because the fact as to whether the body was in part or wholly born would make no difference as to the appearance of the wounds. The most legitimate inferences de- rivable from them are whether they were inflicted during life or after death, and whether the whole body was in part or wholly born at that time can make no difference. In addition to the questions already stated, the medical witness will be expected to state whether, in his opinion, the wounds were inflicted before or after birth ; whether they were in fact the cause of the death ; and whether they originated in accident or criminal design. These questions all arise for discussion in 186 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. the case of persons found dead, and to that head the further consideration of them is referred.' A mode of death that has been sometimes resorted to with success, is the introduction of sharp pointed instruments in different parts of the lody. Some time since, a midwife was executed in Paris for murdering several children by plunging a needle into the head, while it was presenting at the os externum. A similar murderous practice is mentioned by Brendel and Belloc. Sharp pointed instruments, as a means of destroying life, have been thrust into other parts of the child, such as the temples, inner canthus of the eye, spinal marrow, the neck, the thorax, about the region of the heart, and the abdomen. Sometimes, also, down the throat, and up into the rectum. 1 Beck's Med. Juris., 398-9 ; Taylor's Medical Jurisprudence, 388 ; Guy's Principles oj Forensic Medicine, 186. In cases of this kind, dissection is the only means likely to re- veal the cause. Where suspicion is entertained that an instru- ment has penetrated the brain, the head should be thoroughly shaved ; when, upon examination, it will present a slight ecchy- mosis around the puncture. Pressing this into the substance of the brain, the nature and extent of the injury will be ascertain- ed. The same course must be pursued in punctures which are discovered in other parts of the body. Another mode of death sometimes resorted to, is luxation and fracture of the neck. This is accomplished by forcibly twisting the head of the child, or pulling it backwards. In these cases, the vertebrae are fractured, the ligaments ruptured, and death produced by the injury inflicted upon the spinal marrow. The local derangements will, in such cases, reveal the cause of death; the position of the head, the fracture of the first or second ver- tebrae, and the extravasation of blood among the cervical muscles, the latter, more particularly, showing that the violence was com- mitted upon a living subject. 1 Becks Med. Juris., 401. This form of injury cannot take place prior to the delivery of a part of the child, and is therefore evidence of intentional vio- lence. It may, however, occur before the entire delivery. 6. Strangulation. This is not an unfrequent form of child INFANTICIDE. 187 murder, and in its investigation are presented many difficult and embarrassing questions. In the first place, it may be stated that the general signs or indications of death from strangulation are essentially the same in the infant as in the adult, but there are several questions arising in the former case, which do not in the latter. But although in the adult a red and swollen appearance of the face and head is indicative of death from strangulation, yet in the infant such appearances must not be hastily assumed as affording such clear indications. In natural births, nothing is more common than for the head and face of the infant to appear swollen and of a deep color at birth, which gradually disappears in a few days, if the child live. Where appearances indicate that strangulation has been the mode of death, the first question, perhaps, which would natural- ly present itself, would be, whether that had been effected by the accidental twisting around the neck of the umbilical cord, or whether it was the intentional act of the mother. When the cord happens to be long, it sometimes occurs that during delive- ry, it becomes accidentally twisted around the neck of the infant so tight as to cause death by strangulation. It has been by some supposed, that, in such case, there would be no livid or ecchy- mosed mark or depression on the neck, such as indicates death in the adult from this cause. To this, however, it is answered, that this is not a constant, although an usual accompaniment of death in the adult from this cause ; and also, that it is now as- certained that the umbilical cord may produce a livid or ecchy- mosed depression. Taylor's Med. Juris., 391. Still, the fact remains certain, that when the mark is found to be deep and much ecchymosed, with extravasation of blood be- neath it, accompanied with ruffling or laceration of the skin, it cannot proceed from the umbilical cord, but must be attributed to other means. Ibid, 392. Here, also, it should be observed, that the legal requirements are of such a character as to render death, by the accidental twisting of the umbilical cord, a matter of difficult if not of impossible occurrence. The rule has already been adverted to, that the entire and complete birth of every part of the child 188 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. must be effected before it could be considered as. legally alive. Another rule has also been laid down, which, although not in all respects inconsistent with the one just mentioned, is nevertheless a very different one. That is, the rule announced by Justice Parke, in the case of Rex vs. Enoch, Archibald, 367 : " that there must be an independent circulation in the child, before it can be accounted alive." This occurs upon the establishment of res- piration, when the blood no longer passes from the mother to the child. It may .take place when it is half born, and if it be taken as the only test of life, would, in that respect, conflict with the rule above mentioned. However that may be, let either or both rules be adopted, it is quite obvious, that after the estab- lishment of an independent circulation, or after the entire birth of the child, the accidental twisting of the umbilical cord around its neck so as to produce strangulation, would be a very rare and difficult occurrence. Cases have occurred, in which the umbilical cord has been made use of as a means of strangulation. Taylor's Med. Juris., 391-2. Thus a case of this kind is stated : The umbilical cord was twisted once around the neck, passed under the left arm, over the shoulders, a.id round the neck again, forming a noose or knot ; which, pressing upon the throat, must have caused stran- gulation, as the tongue was protruded, and there were other clear indications of the child's having been strangled. The hydrostatic test showed that the child had respired. Taylor's Med. Juris., 3Q2. The other questions that arise, the principal one of which is, whether the strangulation was the cause of death, or intended merely to conceal that cause, belong equally to Infanticide and persons found dead, and require, therefore, no discussion here It should, however, be remarked, that, so far as the external marks of strangulation are concerned, there is no difference in the appearances, whether the constriction takes place during life or immediately after death, and while the body is yet warm Ibid, 393. Strangulation may also be effected by the pressure of the fin INFANTICIDE. 189 gers on the throat, in which ecchymosis may be found corres- ponding with the cause. 7. Poisoning. This is a form of death rarely resorted to in cases of infanticide. A case is mentioned by Mr. Taylor, as the earli- est he had ever known, in which the child was. two months of age. Arsenic was administered, and the child died in three hours and a quarter. This could hardly be termed a case of infanticide. If cases of this kind should occur, the rules to be observed in the examination of the stomach and intestines, and the substances contained within them, are the same for the in- fant as for the adult, and may therefore be referred to the sub- ject of poisons. 8. Intentional neglect of tying the umbilical cord. It has been a matter of much dispute whether the tying the umbilical cord, in case it be either cut or torn, is a necessary precaution to save the life of the infant. By those who deem it unnecessary, it is urged, that the umbilical vessels, whether cut or torn, have a sufficient contractile power to prevent any great loss of blood ; that in other animals, this tying of the cord is unnecessary, and therefore it must be useless in the human species ; and finally, that as, in some surgical operations, the arteries contract sponta- neously, so they should have a similar contraction in the cord. To the first, it is answered, that it is but another mode of say- ing, that, under such circumstances, a fatal haemorrhage does not take place. To the second, that there are points of difference between the structure of the human cord and that of animals. In animals, the umbilical vessels are full of rugae or folds ; the cord is also smaller than in the human species ; and when the animal is born, the vessels are in a manner closed by a kind of cellular structure. Besides, in them, the cord is never cut, but is torn asunder, which gives to the vessels a strong tendency to contract. To the third, it is answered, that arteries of small size may contract, but in those of the same magnitude as the umbilical, fatal haemorrhage may result from not securing them. There are, however, some instances on record going to show, that fatal haemorrhage may result from a neglect in tying the umbilical cord. There are also a number of other cases men- 190 MEDICAL JUB.ISPRCDENCE. tioned by M. Klein, in which the cord was ruptured, and in some cases close to the abdomen, without being attended by fatal umbilical hgemorrhage. The mere absence of the ligature should, therefore, never be taken as affording, of itself, conclusive evi- dence of death by haemorrhage. 1 Beck's Med. Juris., 393, etseq. The following are enumerated as the indications of death by haemorrhage from the umbilical cord : 1. Paleness of the surface, with a peculiar waxy appearance : 2. Paleness and want of color in the muscles of the internal viscera : 3. Absence of the usual quantity of blood in the heart and blood vessels. It is not necessary to raise an inference of this kind, that the vessels should be found entirely empty. It is said that if three ounces of blood can be collected, it may be pre- sumed that the child has not died of haemorrhage. 9. Causing the child to inhale air deprived of its oxygen, or gases positively deleterious. This is a species of suffocation, and might have been included under that head. It occurs when the child, as soon as it is born, is shut up in a tight box, and thus excluded fiom the atmosphere. Infants are in general less able to sustain the deprivation of oxygen, than adults. In one case, one was suffocated by some drunken men repeatedly blowing out a candle and holding the wick under its nose. In such cases, the absence of any other assignable cause of death, together with the circumstances under which the child is found, may furnish the means of arriving at conclusions as to the way by which death has been effected. 16. What are the natural or accidental modes by which the life of the child may have been destroyed 1 There may be reckoned three classes of causes which may, either at the time or immediately subsequent to delivery, result in producing the death of the infant, without any blame being attached to the mother or any one else. These'are — 1. Certain accidental circumstances occurring either during, or immediately after delivery, such as the following : The child sometimes comes into the world in a state of supination, and INFANTICIDE. 191 may loose its life in consequence of not being removed from that state. 1 Beck's Mel. Juris., 404. The manner in which death is produced from this cause, is that the mouth of the infant is so closely applied to the bed- clothes, or 'other substances in its way, or is so completely im- mersed in the pool made by the uterine discharges, as entirely to prevent the occurrence of respiration. The labor may also be so sudden and rapid, that the child may loose its life from that cause. There are instances on record, where the expulsion has been so sudden, that the child has been thrown out on the floor, or in the utensil under a night-chair. The labor, in such cases, may very probably be attended with faintings or convulsions of the mother, so as to render her in- competent to afford any assistance to the child. 1 Beck's Med. Juris., 405. In such cases, the child may die from the injury, or expire from suffocation. It is obvious, however, that although these are cases of possible occurrence, yet their probability is very re- mote, and when they do happen innocently, there is generally sufficient evidence to be gathered from all the attendant facts and circumstances. There may be accidental hsemorrhage from the umbilical cord prevailing to a sufficient extent to destroy the life of the child. We have already seen that there may be an intentional neglect to tie the umbilical cord. This haemorrhage may occur from an accidental rupture and neglect properly to tie it. It should be borne constantly in mind, that those cases which are the most likely to become subjects of medico-legal examination, are the very ones in which we should expect to find the greatest degree of ignorance on the part of the mother. A case involving this question arose in the Queen vs. Dash, in 1842, referred to in Taylor, 383. There was no doubt in that case but that the child had breathed, and that its death had been caused by hsemorrhage from the lacerated umbilical cord. The .medical witness testified that the cord might have been torn through by the weight of the child during labor, and the jury acquitted the prisoner on 19'i, MEDICAL JURISPBUDENrir the ground that she might have been ignorant of the necessity, or not have had the power, to tie the cord. The child may die from compression of the cord during labor. In the case of a foot or breach presentation, the cord, under strong uterine contraction, may be so compressed, as to arrest the circulation between the mother and the child, which would result in the death of the latter. So also during delivery, the cord may become twisted around the neck of the child, and f hus prove the cause of its death. This latter has sometimes pro- duced death before parturition. This is not properly strangula- tion, as it occurs before the es>TaDhshment 01 respiration. It is simply the arrest of the circulation. A child may also die from prematurely tying the umbilical cord. It is well known that circulation by the cord and respire >- tion are vicarious functions. That both cannot exist together, and that the one must cease before the other can become established. It is accordingly laid down as a principle, that the cord should never be tied, or divided, until respiration has become perfectly established. Dr. Dewees states, " that he has seen several in- stances of death, and this of a painful and protracted kind, from the premature application of the ligature." Its too hasty appli- cation, in such cases, has been followed by breathlessness and lividity of countenance. The death of the child may also be caused by a protracted de- livery. This may result either from an injury being inflicted on the head during the violent contractions of the uterus, or to an interrupted circulation before respiration is established. In either case, a child, if delicate and feeble, may die from exhaustion. So also death may arise from the debility of the child. This would be the most likely to occur in a premature birth. In such, existence may continue for several hours with a very feeble res- piration, and then death may supervene. These cases may ge- nerally be recognized by a want of development in the body, and evident signs of immaturity. 2. The second class of causes embrace all congenital malforma- tions of organs of such a character as to produce death at birth or soon afterwards. INFANTICIDE. 193 These malformations, in order to be fatal, must be of large and important organs. Those of the heart and vascular system may be — a congenital opening between the two ventricles ; the heart consisting only of one auricle and one ventricle ; the aorta arising from both ventricles ; and the pulmonary artery impervi- ous at its origin. There may also be malformations of the. res- piratory organs ; of the alimentary canal ; the stomach, and the intestinal canal, especially that part of it constituting the rec- tum. 1 Beck's Med. Juris., 409, et seq ; Taylor's Med. Juris., 384. It is not at all important to go into a minute consideration of these, because if they are of so marked, and severe, a cha- racter, as to be entirely inconsistent with the continuance of life at birth, they will be obvious, and present themselves as the cause of death on a very slight examination. 3. The third class includes various diseases, either congenital, or occurring immediately after birth. Those which are of so se- vere a character, as to prevent the establishment of new vital processes at birth, or to render the continuance of any such im- possible, have their seats in three of the most essential organs, viz : the heart, lungs and brain. In regard to the first, there are none on record that result in the destruction of life so suddenly, as to raise any questions of a medico-legal nature. Guy's Principles of Forensic Medicine, 183. There is, however, the Morbus caruleus, cyanosis, or blue disease, formerly attributable to the foramen ovale remaining open after birth, which sometimes produces death in a few hours. Besides the peculiar color of the skin during crying, or any other effort, from which the name is derived ; the symptoms are — disordered circulation, disturbed respiration, diminished temperature, some- times accompanied with laborious breathing, fainting, palpita- tion, and suffocation. It is during the prevalence of these latter symptoms, that life is endangered and not unfrequently lost. Diseases of the lungs may be hepatization, pulmonary apoplexy, pulmonary tubercles, cedema, and cedema lardariforme, being a mixture of cedema and schirrhus. These may either affect the entire structure of the lungs, or any part of them. Where the 13 194 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. entire structure is affected, life can continue but fo a very briel period, and in such cases the pulmonary tests wil? jenerally de- cide that no respiration has taken place. Whert the disease is partial, the medical witness may be required to state what agency it had in the production of death. These cases cm seldom be attended with much difficulty ; as the presence of \ke disease, whether affecting the whole organ or only a part ci it, will be apparent on examination. That peculiar condition 01 ihe lungs termed atelectasis, consisting in imperfect expansion, is not here included, as that probably depends on a defect of innervation, and not on disease. The brain and spinal marrow may become diseased from ac- cumulations of fluid and morbid softening. The accumulation of serum must be very considerable, and the morbid softening prevail to a great extent, in order to be either of them the cause of death. It must, however, be remembered, that the brain of the foetus is naturally softer and much more vascular than that of the adult, which should be fully taken into consideration in the investigation of medico-legal questions bearing upon this point. " All these diseased affections are of rare occurrence, and when they are found to be present, it is rarely to such a degree as to affeet the question of infanticide. It is only when they exist in a marked form and to a considerable extent, that they can be received in explanation of the early death of the child." Guy's Principles of Forensic Medicine, 185. It is children of a relatively large size, as compared with that of the pelvis, that are the most likely to perish in the birth. One general fact must here be kept in mind, and that is, that among legitimate children, according to statistical tables extend- ing over a series of years', and embracing not less than eight mil- lions of cases, the proportion of still-born varies from one in eighteen to one in twenty. Among illegitimate children the proportion is one in eight or ten, which is certainly a very im- portant circumstance. Taylor's Med. Juris., 382 ; Guy's 'Prin- ciples of Forensic Medicine, 186. 17. What are the principal points to which the attention should INFANTICIDE. 195 be drawn, and the most approved methods to be pursued in the making of examinations in cases of alleged infanticide 1 1. The attention should be directed to the body of the child. That should be weighed and measured, the position of its centre ascertained ; its size should be noted, the condition of the umbili- cal cord, whether it be torn or cut ; the dimensions of the head and thorax ; every thing relating to its external appearance, shape, conformation, condition as to putrefaction, spots, ecchy- mosis, &c. 1 Beck's Med. Juris., 418 ; Guy's Principles of Foren- sic Medicine, 193. 2. Any marks of violence on the surface of the body must be carefully inspected, with the view of determining, if any be pre- sent, whether they might have been produced during birth, or resulted from accidental causes acting after birth, or were inflicted by design. The mouth, fontanelles, orbits, &c, should be care- fully examined for wounds inflicted by sharp pointed instruments. In order to examine the mouth, an incision may be made from the under lip to the top of the sternum, and another along the lower edge of the inferior maxillary bone ; after which the in- teguments may be dissected back. Divide the lower jaw at its symphysis, and separate the two portions. By bending the head back, a view of the cavity of the mouth may be obtained and the position of the tongue examined. Attention should be directed to the mouth to ascertain whether any and what foreign matters are to be found in it. In this connection also the larynx and trachea should be laid open and examined, together with so much of the oesophagus as can now be seen. 3. Divide the ribs and sternum in the ordinary manner, a scissors being the more convenient instrument. After examin- ing the configuration and size of the thorax, and laying it open, its contents should be carefully observed. The general appear- ance, position and color of the lungs should be noted. It should be observed whether they are of a uniform liver color and com- pact consistence throughout, or spongy like the adult lung, or mottled with developed air cells, as in imperfect respiration. Divide the trachea near the lungs, tie the aorta and vence cavse, and cut them beyond the ligature. Remove the lungs from the 196 MEDICAJ, JURISPRUDENCE. thorax, and see if there are any parts of a lighter color than the rest, observing whether the structure of the lung itself is devel- oped in those parts, and carefully distinguishing the developed air cells from air contained beneath the pleura, the result of pu- trefaction. The lungs should now be subjected to the static and hydrostatic tests, in the manner already directed. The heart should also be thoroughly examined, to see whether the auricles and ventricles are filled with blood, and particularly what is the state and condition of the ductus arteriosus and foramen ovale. 4. Attention may next be directed to the abdomen. To do this continue the first incision down to the lower part of the sternum, and from this point make an incision, through the in- teguments, to the spine of the ilium on each side. Turn down the triangular flap thus made, and examine and tie the umbilical vessels. The first thing to be observed is the diaphragm. Ex- amine the extent of its arch towards the thorax. Observe the condition of the ductus venosus, whether it be pervious or con- tain blood. Tie the vessels leading to the liver, separate them beyond the ligature, take out the liver and weigh it. After having tied the two ends of the intestinal canal remove it, to- gether with the stomach. Observe whether there be any appear- ance of inflammation in any part of the canal, and if so, particu- larly if the stomach exhibit any evidence of inflammatory action, test its contents with a view to the discovery of poison. It should be observed whether there is any evidence of the com- mencement of the putrefactive process. The contents of the stomach should also be examined to see whether there are in it any foreign substances, going to show that the child had been fed. The intestines should undergo a like examination to. deter- mine the presence or absence of meconium. The state of the gall bladder and urinary bladder, particularly of the latter, should be examined to see whether they are empty, or if not, how full they may be of contents. . 5. As injury causing death is sometimes inflicted on the spine, it becomes necessary to direct the attention to that part. It should be ascertained whether there is any dislocation or frac- ture of the vertebra?. To make a more perfect examination, a INFANTICIDE. 197 longitudinal incision should be made from the occiput to the sacrum, the muscles being separated and turned back. Divide the vertebrae on each side by means of strong scissors. Remove the posterior part of the spine, and the whole canal will be ex- posed for examination. 1 Beck's Med. Juris., 420. C. Attention may next be directed to the head. Make an in- cision from the lower part of the frontal bone, quite down to the second or third cervical vertebras, and another at right angles to this, from ear to ear. Dissect back the integuments thus di- vided, and the cranium will be completely exposed. Examine the bones of the skull both at the vertex and base, to see if there be any fractures, punctures or wounds. Separate the bones by a scissors passed along their membranous connexion with each other, and then remove them. The brain and its 'membranes should now be examined, to see whether they are in a healthy condition, or whether there is any effusion of blood or serum. If any puncture or wound appear upon the cranium, that por- tion of the brain immediately beneath it must be the subject of careful examination. 7. Attention must also be directed to the suspected female, to iscertain whether she has been recently delivered, and how long, and whether the signs of delivery correspond with the appear- ances discovered on examination of the child. Should the re- sult of this examination render it clear that the female is the mother of the child, it may become necessary to enquire into the state of her mind, with the view of determining whether she be, in fact, a responsible agent. It should be borne in mind, that puerperal insanity is, by no means, a rare disease, and that it sometimes takes the form of homicidal mania, theatening the life of the child. It is true, this species of insanity does not usually supervene sooner than the third day after delivery, and sometimes not for a fortnight ; yet there are exceptions. 3 Paris 8f Fcmblanque's Med. Juris., 129. An interesting case in which this question arose, is reported in 1 H: P. C, 36. It occurred in 1668, at Aylesbury. "A married woman of good reputation being delivered of a child, and not having slept many nights, fell into a temporary phrenzy, and 19? MEDICAL Jt'RISPRUDENCE. killed her infant in the absence of any company ; but, company coming in, she told them she had killed her infant, and there it lay. She was brought to jail presently, and after some sleep she recovered her understanding, but marveled how or why she came thither. She was indicted for murder, and upon her trial, the whole matter appearing, it was left to the jury with this di- rection, that if it did appear that she had any use of reason when she did it, they were to find her guilty ; but if they found her under a phrenzy, though by reason of her late delivery and want of sleep, they should acquit her ; that had there been any occa- sion to move her to this fact, as to hide her shame, which is ordi- narily the case of such as are delivered of bastard children, and destroy them; or if there had been jealousy of the husband that the child had been none of his ; or if she had hid the in- fant, or denied the fact, these had been evidences that the phren- zy was counterfeit ; but none of these appearing, and the honesty and virtuous deportment of the woman in her health, being known to the jury, and many circumstances of insanity appearing, the jury found her not guilty." These are the principal points and methods to be pursued in the investigation of questions of Infanticide. II. WOUNDS. All the topics to be discussed under this head, can be best presented in the following order : I. Definition. What is included under the term 1 II. Division into two main classes : 1 . Those unaccompanied by solution of continuity, in- cluding all contusions, fractures, concussions, dislocations and sprains : 2. Those accompanied by solution of continuity, in- cluding all incised, lacerated, punctured, sword and gun- shot wounds. III. Wounds as they affect the several parts and systems of the body. IV. General medico-legal questions that may arise in the in- WOUNDS. 199 vestigation of all wounds, however or whenever inflicted, inclu- ding the legal principles applicable to this head. I. Definition. What is included under the term wound ? This term must have a different meaning attached to it, in legal medicine, from what it has in surgery. In the latter, it is more generally understood as being confined to those organic lesions that are accompanied by solution of continuity. In the former, it is much more comprehensive, embracing every species of injury inflicted on the body by mechanical agents. 2 Beck's Med. Juris. ,178 ; Guy's Principles of Forensic Medicine, 446. Some difference of opinion has arisen in relation to what is really included under the term wound, which has sometimes created embarrassment in medico-legal examinations, and even in the framing of indictments. Dr. Watson, in his work on homicide, page 18, says, that " in legal medicine, under the term wound is to be included every local alteration of any part of the body, produced by violent means, whether the cause has been directed against the body, or the body against the wound- ing cause." Hence he says, " we refer to wounds, incisions, lace- rations, contusions, concussions, fractures, dislocations, sprains and burns, whether by fire or by escharotics." This is a more comprehensive definition than is generally adopted. The law, as expounded by the English and American courts, asserts that in order to constitute a wound, the skin should always be broken or injured. It excludes burns, whether produced by heated metals or corrosive liquids, although they would seem to be included in the above definition. So, also, would the definition exclude the fracture of a bone which was unaccompanied with a solution of continuity. Taylor's Med Juris., 232. I shall adopt the first definition given, which is that of Dr. Guy, viz., that every species of injury inflicted on the body by me chemical means or agents, is, in a medico-legal sense, a wound. II. Division: All wounds are to be included within one or the other of two large classes. These are, 1. Those unaccompanied by solution of continuity • 200 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. 2. Those which are accompanied by solution of continuity. First class of wounds : Under this class are included all contusions, concussions, frac- tures, dislocations and sprains. A contusion is a bruise of the soft parts, without cutting or laceration of the skin, caused by a blunt, hard, or firm and heavy body. Watson on Horn., 21. There are various degrees of this injury. There may be simply a rupture of the capillary vessels, or a dilaceration, consisting in abrasion of the tissues, or a complete attrition or disorganization of the soft parts. Contusions may affect, more or less, all parts of the body. They are rendered formidable by the commotion they may cause in important organs, by rupture of tissue, by inflammation, sup- puration, and gangrene, lb., 22. A contused wound is generally what in common language is termed a bruise, and in scientific, ecchymosis. The investigation of this form or result of a wound, becomes of peculiar impor- tance, connected, as it very frequently is, with many nice and difficult questions of a medico-legal eharacter. Ecchymosis, literally meaning, to pour out, consists of an in- filtration, or effusion of blood, into the cellular tissue of any part of the body. It may be of the superficial or deep-seated parts. It is more frequently of the superficial parts, and, if very slight, no external mark is presented. When the cellular tissue under the skin is only affected, and a tumor slightly elevated is formed, it is called ecchymosis by infiltration ; but when blood is accumulated in a considerable mass, forming a soft, prominent and elastic swelling, it is called ecchymosis by congestion. The subject of ecchymosis will be best treated, by considering, 1. Its cause ; 2. Its seat; 3. Its form; 4. Its history; 5. Its diag- nosis ; and, 6. Its production before and after death. 1 . Its cause. By far the most common, are blows, falls, or bring- ing any soft part of the body suddenly and violently into contact with any hard, unyielding substance. It may, however, occa ■ sionally be referred to other causes. Narrow and oblique punc tured wounds may occasion it; so, also, may certain diseased states, such as scorbutic and hemorrhagic complaints. It may WOUNDS. 201 also, be caused by any great exertion of the body, continued foi a length of time, or any violent movement, such as occurs in leaping, lifting a heavy weight, vomiting, the stretching and compression of the parts in child-birth, (Watson on Horn., 23 ;) or any other species of effort, or movement, that is sufficiently violent, or long continued, to produce a rupture of the capillary vessels. Its presence is not, therefore, perfect evidence of the infliction of injury. 2. Its seat : The seat of the ecchymosis may be stated, in general terms, to be the cellular membrane or tissue. It is not, however, confined to this, but may involve, more or less, the whole substance of the cutis. Guy's Principles of Forensic Medicine, 449. It may be situated immediately under the epidermis, or the blood may be infiltrated among the muscles, beneath the tendinous aponeu- rosis ; it may be under the periosteum, between the viscera and the membrane which covers them ; it may be found in the sub- stance of the organs, between the peritoneum and the parieties of the abdomen, or between the nerves and blood-vessels, being effused into the cellular tissue which forms their sheath. In some cases, the blood which is effused is small in quantity, and the space occupied consequently small. In others, the quantity is larger, and the space occupied considerably increased. Watson on Horn., 23. It is in general superficial, affecting only the layers of the skin ; but in some instances, may be found deep-seated, the blood being effused among the muscles and beneath the fascise. In the latter case, it will be found much more difficult to determine the ex- tent of it from the discoloration, which will be commonly slight. Taylor's Med. Juris., 239 Sometimes the ecchymosis will not show itself immediately over or around the seat of the injury, but at some distance from it. Dr. Chowne mentions a case where a young man received a severe bruise on the inner side of the ankle, the ecchymosis ap- pearing in two days afterwards, around the outer ankle. There is also a case mentioned of a compound fracture of the tibia, about one- third down, produced by the wheel of a carriage pass 202 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. » ing over the leg, in which there was no ecchymosis around the seat of the injury, but after some days, the skin of the knee and lower part of the thigh became ecchymosed. Taylor's Med. Juris., 239-40. Where deep-seated, as under the tendinous aponeurosis of the muscles, or among the muscles themselves, there is frequently no external mark. Watson on Horn., 24. 3. Its form. The form of the bruise or ecchymosis will de- pend on the shape of the weapon with which it has been inflicted ; and this is a fact which may sometimes become of great impor- tance. Guy's Principles of Forensic Medicine, 248, Taylor, 240. In death caused by hanging, or by strangling with a cord, the ecchymosed line around the neck will generally indicate its cause with precision, as well as evidence the cause of death. So, also, where the death has been caused by strangulation by means of the hands, the ecchymosed spots caused by the appli- cation of the fingers will generally render apparent the cause of death. A very remarkable case is mentioned by Starkie, under title, circumstantial evidence, vol. 1 of his work on evidence, which goes to show the importance of attending to the form of an ecchymosis. In an attempt at murder, the person assaulted, in his own de- fence struck the assassin violently in the face' with the key of the house door, this being the only weapon he had near at hand. The ecchymosis which followed the blow, corresponded precisely in shape to the wards of the key, and it was chiefly through this very singular and unexpected piece of evidence, that the assassin was afterwards identified and brought to trial. 4. Its history. It becomes important to understand the changes that take place in the ecchymosed spot, and the order of their succession, with the view of arriving at the probable time at which the injury was inflicted. When the superficial parts are contused, especially the lax and yielding portions of the skin, the color makes its appearance at once. When the effusion is deeper seated, some days may elapse before any discoloration of the skin takes plade ; and if it be under the tendinous aponeuro- WOUNDS- 203 sis of the muscles, or among the muscles themselves, there is frequently no external mark whatever. When the injury has been inflicted upon the superficial parts, the color is not developed to its full extent at once, but continues to deepen for five or six hours, and sometimes longer. After a time, the serum becomes effused and inflammation supervenes, by which the extent of the ecchymosis is increased. The follow- ing are substantially the changes that occur. " In most cases the ecchymosed part at first exhibits a red or bluish color, which soon becomes livid, lead-colored, or black. This takes place from the blood situated under the skin. But as the effused blood ceases to circulate, it undergoes certain changes before it is ab sorbed, which cause a variation in the color of the part. In a few days the color lightens, acquires a violet tint, then becomes greenish, yellowish and finally disappears. The time of the change in color is marked by an extent of the spot, the centre of it being always of a deeper color than the circumference. These changes arise from the effused blood loosing its color, becoming brownish, coagulated, undergoing daily absorption, as also being diluted with the secretion from the cellular tissue, by which it becomes more diffused. The age, constitution, habits of life of the individual, the extent and situation of the ecchymosis, and the cause by which it has been occasioned, have a remarkable influence upon the time necessary for its complete resolution. It has been found distinct when cut into, though probably much lessened in size, several weeks after the infliction of the injury. In the case of an old man it was distinct five weeks after. Wat- son on Horn., 234 ; Guy, 448 ; Taylor, 240. When the cellular membrane is dense, the ecchymosis is less rapidly formed, and when formed the changes occur less rapidly, than when a loose portion of it is effused." The complete disappearance of the ecchymosis is owing to the entire absorption of the effused blood. This disappearance, as might reasonably be expected, commences at the circumference or margin of the ecchymosis, and gradually extends towards the centre. The central part of it often retains its deep blue color, after the marginal parts have completely changed their ap- 204 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. pearance. Guy's Principles of Forensic Medicine, 448 j Taylor') Med. Juris., 240. 5. Its Diagnosis. Under this head is included the means and methods of discriminating between real ecchyniosis, and cada- verous ecchymosis or suggillation. The latter is so called from sugillatio — a black mark, and is frequently found upon the dead body, and occasionally upon the living. In living persons, who are very aged, it is not unusual to find upon the legs and feet livid patches, sometimes mottled, and at others, possessing uniformity of color. They are owing to the languor of the capillary circulation, and are found upon those parts of the body the farthest removed from the centre of circu- lation, and where the blood has to contend with the law of gravity in ascending from the lower extremities. Taylor's Med. Juris., 242. The age of the individual, the place where found, the ab- sence of all abrasion of the skin, the extent, enveloping often the whole circumference of the leg, and other means of discrimi- nation, rendered more apparent hereafter, will afford sufficient data from which, in any such case, a true judgment can be formed. In those who have died from scurvy, typhus, and other ady- namic diseases, similar discolorations are sometimes noticed. In those severely affected with scurvy, a very slight pressure on any part of the skin will produce a spot resembling ecchymosis, which arises from a rupture of minute cutaneous vessels. The extra- vasation, however, in such cases is the more generally wholly confined to the superficial layers of the true skin. An examina- tion of the gums, of the surface of the skin generally, and of the mucous membranes, will, in such cases, enable any one properly to discriminate and judge. Guy's Principles of Forensic Medir cine, 449. Discolored spots, under certain states of the system, sometimes occur spontaneously, and often cover the body to a great extent. When small they are termed petechise. When extensive, they constitute the chief pathognomonic character of the disease termed purpura. In distinguishing these, especially the latter, a difficulty may sometimes exist, but the appearance of the sub WCUNDS. 203 ject, the general diffusion over the whole body, together with their existence on the mucous membrane of the fauces and ali- mentary canal, will, at least, indicate that their existence is not owing to violence. Taylor's Med. Juris., 242-3. To all these discolorations, as well as those presently to be no- ticed as occurring after death, the term suggillation has been ap- plied. Guy, 449; Taylor, 242-3. The meaning of the term — a black mark, embraces equally a real ecchymosis, as all other spots or discolorations, whether pro- duced on the living or dead body. To remedy this, it has been proposed to confine the term suggillation simply to those appear- ances that are presented after death, and that make their first appearance in the dead body. These appearances are somewhat various, differing also as to the times in which they occur. One of them may be said to be a consequence of death, but is not fully developed until the body has cooled. It is presented in the form of diffused livid, purple, or mottled patches, over the chest, neck, sides, or abdomen, and often covering the external or internal surfaces of the upper or lower extremities. These patches are commonly well defined in their extent by the whiteness of the surrounding skin. The color is confined to the upper surface of the cutis, and never ex- tends through it. These appearances will generally be present in those who have died suddenly, or by a violent death ; as in those who perish from apoplexy or asphyxia, and they are as- cribed to the congestion which takes place in the capillary sys- tem at the moment of death in subjects which are full of blood. They indicate vigor in the circulating system at the time of death, and suddenness of dissolution. There is little danger of confound- ing them with real ecchymosis. Taylor' 's Med. Juris., 243 ; Guy's Principles of Forensic Medicine, 450. Another appearance presented is, when the discolorations, in- stead of presenting in patches, are found distributed in stripes, crossing and intersecting each other over the body, and bearing son* -t resemblance to those caused by flagellation. They have heiice been termed vibices. They occur on different parts of the body, but the most frequently on the sides, upper part of the 206 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. shoulders and" back. In color they vary from a scarlet to a da/k red or livid hue. It has been supposed by some that their cause is attributable to wrapping the body in a sheet or other covering soon after death, and to the accumulation of the blood in those parts of the skin which are exposed to the least degree of pres- sure. The sound state of the cuticle and the superficial nature of the discoloration, will generally be sufficient to enable any one to discriminate between this, and the ecchymosis which is the result of violence. • Taylor's Med. Juris., S43 -4 ; Guy's Principles of Forensic Medicine, 450. One other appearance still, is that observed in the dead body and which is not to be found until some time after death. It is supposed by some to be owing to incipient putrefaction. It is usually confined to the skin covering the back, loins, buttocks, and occiput, and is caused by the infiltration of blood into the most depending parts of the body. The entire cutis becomes injected, and the adipose tissue filled with sanguineous serum. The color increases as putrefaction advances, passing from a dark red to a green, and then to black. These are distinguishable in several ways from the real ecchymosis. 1. They are found in the most 'depending parts of the body, being principally, if not entirely, the result of gravitation. A change in the position of the body will not unfrequently cause these appearances to change, also, disappearing from the parts that are elevated, and following those that are the most depending. 2.. In these there is simply congestion of blood in Ijhe capillary tissue alone, not extending to the subcutaneous. The removal of a layer of the skin, where these lividities are present, will show that it is confined to this organ, and is not attended with infiltration of blood into the cellular membrane. 3. They are of a uniform color, whereas in real ecchymosis the central part is generally found to be of the deepest color. 4. In real ecchymosis, the blood, on cutting into it, will be found to be thick, concrete blood ; but in these cadaverous lividi- ties, thin, fluid blood. This remark was made by Zacchias. Guy's Principles of Forensic Medicine, 449 ; Taylor's Med. Juris.. 245 ; 2 Beck's Med. Juris.j 14-15. WOUNDS. 207 In the great majority of cases, the medical jurist will fiiid no difficulty in determining whether the appearance presented, be a real ecchymosis or the result of causes operating towards the close of life or after death. A case, however, is given by Mr. Taylor, page 244, which shows that doubts and difficulties may occur in some extraordinary cases. A man aged 33, died sud- denly of disease of the heart. He had been laboring under ana- sarca. The body was examined 18 hours after death, and the skin was found covered in different parts with patches of ecchy- mosis, some being small and others several inches in diameter, and all closely resembling ecchymoses, which are the results of violence. Around many of them was the wide border or ring of straw color, with various shades of green, similar to those witnessed in the disappearance of an ecchymosis upon the living subject, and which has generally been considered as peculiar to it. On cutting into these patches, the layers of the cutis as well as the cellular tissue beneath, were throughout reddened by con- gested blood. There could hardly be said to be extravasation of blood, but small rounded semi-coagulated masses oozed out from the cells on slight pressure. The border or ring of straw color, was owing to the individual having labored under anasarca, the effused serum having diluted the blood as it oozed out from the cells. These patches, it was remarked were presented on the most recumbent or depending parts. Notwithstanding their close resemblance, there were here three indications that these were cadaverous, and not real ecchymoses. 1. Their seats being the most recumbent or depending parts. 2. The skin was in a natural state and entirely unruffled. 3. The very slight extravasation of blood compared with the extent of the ecchymosed surface. This case must clearly show that there may be considerable difficulty, in some cases, in ar- riving at clear conclusions upon this subject. G. Its production before and after death. The resemblance which contused wounds, inflicted after death, bear to those inflicted previous to it, will depend upon their se- verity, and the time that has elapsed after death before their in- fliction. If sufficient time have elapsed to admit of vital r< -ac- 208 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. tion, the swelling of the part will proclaim its infliction during life, or a change of color, or other sign of inflammation, may afford conclusions equally clear. Coagula of blood may afford a remote presumption of bruises inflicted during life, but they are not positively certain in their indications, as they may be found in bruises inflicted soon after death. Fluidity of blood has been cited by some as proving the contusion to have been inflicted during life, but this cannot be relied upon, as blood ef- fused into the brain and spinal canal is often fluid. Another means of distinguishing, and to which considerable reliance can be attached, is the extent of the effusion. In contused wounds which are inflicted after death, there can be very little effusion, unless some large vein be ruptured. Guy's Principles of Forensic Medicine, 451 - 2 ; Taylor's Med. Juris., 243 -4 ; 2 Beck's Med. Juris., 16-17; Watson on Horn., 24-5. According to Dr. Christison, the best diagnostic mark of bruises inflicted during life, and after death, is the discoloration of the cutis, from the effusion of blood into its texture. If inflicted during life, the ecchymosed portion of cutis is dark and dis- colored by the infiltration of blood through its whole thickness, the skin being increased in firmness and tenacity. Where contused wounds are inflicted soon after death, while the body still retains its warmth, and the muscles their contrac- tility, they bear a very great resemblance to those inflicted dur- ing life. Dr. Christison made some experiments upon the re- cently dead, from which he arrives at the following conclusions. " For some hours after death, blows will cause appearances which, in point of color, do not differ from the effects of blows inflicted recently before death. The discoloration, like lividity or suggillation, generally arises from an effusion of the tbinest possible layer of the fluid part of the blood on the outer surface of the true skin, but sometimes also, from an effusion of thin blood into a perceptible stratum of the true skin itself. Dark fluid blood may even be effused into the subcutaneous cellular tissue in the seat of the discolorations, so as to blacken or redden the membranous partitions of the adipose cells, but this last is never extensive." The general conclusion of the whole deduced WCCNDS. 209 by Dr. Beck is, " that severe blows inflicted after death, ivill exactly imitate slight contusions inflicted during life." 2 Beck's Med. Juris., 17. The time at which blows inflicted after death, will so nearly resemble those inflicted during life, must be limited to the lapse of two, or at most three hours after the extinction of life. If the body be allowed to become cold, and the muscles to acquire rigidity, contusions, although severe, will produce little effect. A question may here be properly raised, whether contused wounds always produce the appearances ascribed to them ; and whether, therefore, if these appearances are not to be found, the conclusion must necessarily arise that no contusion has been in- flicted. This is a very important question, as it has been often asserted in courts of justice, that no severe blow could have been inflicted on a deceased person, because there was no ecchymosis to be found upon the part alleged to have been struck. The general conclusion on this subject may be stated to be — that the presence of ecchymosis may be considered as the presumptive evidence of the infliction of violence ; but that its absence does not negative this presumption. The question above suggested arose on a trial before the jus- ticiary court of Glasgow, in the year 1837. Taylor's Med. Juris., 246. A woman was found dead in her house, and her husband was accused of having murdered her. There was no mark of violence externally ; but on opening the abdomen, the liver was found extensively lacerated, and there was no doubt that this was the cause of death. A medical witness asserted, that as there was no appearance of injury externally, the rupture could not have been caused" by a fall or a blow. He attributed the absence of the marks of ecchymosis to the rupture having been occasioned by the forcible pressure of some heavy rounded smooth body to the abdomen. The prisoner was acquitted on a verdict of not proven. Many instances have been collected, and may be found in Tay- lor, Guy and Watson, in which blows and injuries sufficiently severe to cause death, have been inflicted, and yet no mark, as evidence of their infliction, could be found externally. In one 14 210 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. case a man, aged about thirty, having stumbled and fell on his back, a large iron pipe, for conveying Croton water, rolled on to his body. He lived about a week, and on dissection, the liver was found ruptured. There was no external ecchymosis found, but after two or three days, a yellow suffusion appeared over the abdomen, which gradually became livid. Another was struck by a chain, which broke from violent ex- tension, and knocked him down by a blow over the region of the liver. He ultimately recovered. There was at no time any marks of ecchymosis present. A boy was ran over by the wheel of a cart which passed directly over his abdomen. He recovered, but there was no ecchymosis or discoloration at any time. In another case the wheel of a cart, loaded with brick, passed over the chest of a boy ten years of age. He lived a few hours, and there was no external marks of violence. Guy's Principles of Forensic Medicine, 453 ; Taylor's Med. Juris., 245-6, 7. A laboring man died some hours after fighting with another. On inspection the peritoneum was extensively inflamed, owing to an extravasation of the contents of the jejunum, which was found ruptured to a considerable extent. There was no ecchy- mosis or mark on the skin externally, and the medical inspectors were inclined to affirm, contrary in this case to direct evidence, that no blow could have been struck ; but others were appealed to who at once admitted, that the laceration of the- intestine might have been caused by a blow, even although there was no appearance of violence externally. A girl, aged nine years, received a blow upon the abdomen from a stone. She immediately complained of great pain ; col- lapse ensued, and she died in twenty-one hours. On inspection there was no mark of injury visible externally. A man received a kick from a horse on the abdomen. He died in thirty hours, from peritonitis. The ilium was found completely torn across in its lower third. Although the blow was here struck by the hoof of a horse, a somewhat angular or pointed body, yet there was not the slightest trace of ecchymesis externally. A case of some interest occurred in Scotland in the year 1836,, WOUNDS. 21 1 in which a woman named Finlay was indicted for the man- slaughter of her husband. The deceased, during a quarrel with his wife, met with a severe compound fracture of his leg, but there was no ecchymosis whatever on any part of the limb. Five medical witnesses swore that the fracture must have been produced by a blow, and not by an accidental fall. On cross- examination, one witness said that a blow adequate to cause sim- ple fracture, would produce ecchymosis ; another, that ecchy- mosis seldom occurred until some hours after such an accident. Here the man lived several days and no ecchymosis appeared. Mr. Syme stated that in an open wound, when the blood was allowed to flow away, there would be no ecchymosis ; a statement in general correct, although such might not be a contused wound Other witnesses thought that ecchymosis ought to be produced by blows inflicted on any part of the body, and judging from ex- ternal appearances, they should have supposed that no blows could have been inflicted on the deceased. Another said the fracture must have resulted from a fall and not from a blow. That had it resulted from a blow, he should have expected to find ecchymosis, tumefaction, and ruffling of the skin in the vicinity. That such violence as would have produced the frac- ture, must have caused these appearances. The prisoner was found guilty of a minor offence. It should have been borne in mind in this case, that ecchymosis may be produced by a fall as well as a blow ; and, therefore, that its absence could furnish no proof whatever that the fracture had been caused by a fall. A case is mentioned as occurring in Massachusetts in 1818, in which a small stone was thrown so as to strike the side of the head, causing death in ten minutes, and yet leaving no external mark or bruise. The cranium was very thin, the ventricles filled with coagulated blood, and the pia mater and vessels of the brain gorged with blood. Verdict manslaughter. Guy, 455. A girl was accidentally struck on the back by a log of timber ? and died in a few minutes afterwards. On inspection the right lobe of the liver was found torn through, and the stomach greatly lacerated. There was, notwithstanding, no trace of ecchymosis, or any mark of violence externally. 212 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. Another was struck by the seat of a car, the wheel of which was supposed to have passed over her. She was killed on the spot ; but on examination there were no external indications of violence whatever, although the heart was ruptured. In another case, a man was run over by a wagon, and survived thirty-six hours. All the ribs on the right side of the chest were found broken ; the right pleura was filled with blood, the lung collapsed, and other internal injuries ; and yet there were no ex- ternal marks of bruise or ecchymosis, and the skin was un- injured. The fact that the skin is possessed of great elasticity, is assign- ed as a reason why that may remain uninjured in these severe cases of violence ; but how the vessels can escape rupture where there is a bone beneath them, is difficult to explain. These cases should certainly admonish the medical jurist to be extremely cautious in pronouncing against the possibility of an injury where the usual external indications of it are wanting. They are all difficult of explanation, but some more so than others. For the purpose of explaining the instances in which death took place shortly after the injury, without the occurrence of ecchymosis, it has been suggested, that the individual should survive, for some hours, in order that ecchymosis should be ob- served in the part injured. It is certainly true, that ecchymosis is not always the immediate result of a bruise. It does not, at times, appear for six or eight hours, or until the second day, and in one instance, not until after the fourth day. Probably the superficial or deep seat of the effusion may exert some influence in reference to the time of its external manifestation. But as severe blows on the recently dead body are productive of ecchy- mosed appearances nearly resembling those upon the living, there should be no good reason why a blow during life should not be followed by the usual external indications developed either du- ring life or immediately after its cessation. Taylvrh Med. Juris., 246. It has also been suggested, that many of these blows were in flicted upon the abdomen, and that, in order to have the appear- ance of a bruise produced, it is necessary there should be com- WOUNDS. 213 paratively hard and unyielding parts beneath the skin. Guy's Principles of Forensic Medici?ie, 452. It will be obvious, however, that some of the cases mentioned, especially that of the girl struck on the back by a log of timber, are inconsistent with the entire correctness of this position. A concussion or commotion is a derangement of the functions of any part or organ of the body, arising from the shock occa- sioned by sudden violence. It may, or may not, be accompanied with derangement of structure. In the former case, it is much more dangerous, particularly when it occurs in large and impor- tant organs, and those which are more immediately necessary to life. Watson on Horn., 25. A fracture is a rupture of a bone, or of a cartilage, by exter- nal violence, by a violent exertion, or a fall. Fractures are iden- tified by a change of form, by unnatural immobility, and by a crepitation of the fractured part. Their danger depends on their situation, simplicity or complication, and on many modify- ing circumstances, which have also an application to all other forms of wounds. A fracture produced shortly after death, would not be likely to present any very marked characters that would distinguish it from one produced during life, but very soon after followed by death. If sufficient time after its pro- duction was allowed for the development of inflammatory action, that would afford clear evidence that it was produced during life. So, also, the occurrence of much bloody effusion would indicate the presence of life. Guy's Principles of Forensic Medicine, 456. , Another means of determining whether the fracture was pro- duced prior or subsequent to death, is to examine the muscles These are usually broken in the dead subject, at the same time with the bone, and exhibit no effusion of blood, which would al- most unavoidably occur if the injury preceded death. All the medical witness can be expected to state, in reference to a fracture, is the fact of its existence, and the kind of instru- ment with which it was inflicted ; whether it was produced before or after death, or whether it was not caused by the use of the spade or mattock, during the process of exhumation, are points 214 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. which, if -he can throw any light upon, he must derive it from circumstances other than simply the inspection of the fracture. A dislocation is a derangement of the position of the bony sur- faces forming joints, which is the immediate result of a stroke, fall, external violence, or muscular action, accompanied with pain and alteration of form. Watson on Horn., 25. These also may be simple or compound, but the latter are- much the most dangerous. A sprain is an affection of the joint, occasioned by a twist or a sudden jerk, or violence ; characterized by a painful swelling: and difficulty of movement, and generally attended with more or less rupture of the ligaments of the joint. Watson on Homi r 25-6. Second class of wounds : These are accompanied by solution of continuity. They in- clude all incised, lacerated, punctured sword, and gun shot wounds. Of these, the incised are of much the most frequent occurrence. All wounds accompanied by solution of continuity, have two; eifects or consequences following them. The first and immediate one, is haemorrhage ; the other, and more remote, is inflamma- tion. It is- chiefly by means of one or both of these, that the medical jurist is expected to solve the problem, at times so neces- sary and difficult of solution, whether the wound was inflicted during life or after death. , Hsemorrhage is assumed . as evidence of the existence of the circulation, at the time of its commencement, and hence as proving the fact of life when the violence was committed. 2 Beck's Med. Juris.,. 12. This conclusion, however, should not be received without some qualification. Blood often flows from incisions on the dead body, ' on altering its position, but the quantity will not be very con- siderable. If the large- vessels are found empty, and the blood of a florid red color, it will tend to prove the wound was inflict- ed during life. Lacerated wounds 'are attended with but very little hsemor- V.OUNDS. 215 rhage. Even where an arm has been torn off, the haemorrhage has been observed to be very trifling. In regard to incised wounds, recently inflicted during life, the following are their principal characteristics : 1 . The edges are everted, owing principally to the vital elas- ticity of the skin. The cellular tissue around is also found deep- ly reddened by effused blood. The hemorrhage will be abun- dant, and mostly of the arterial character. 2. Between the lips of the wound, if it have not been inter- fered with, there will be found coagula of blood. Blood that has fallen upon surrounding bodies, will also be found coagulated. 3. If sufficient time have elapsed after the infliction of the wound, say from eighteen to twenty-four hours, and life have continued during that time, there will be found present the usual signs of inflammation, viz., increased redness, swelling, and effusion of coagulable lymph. Guy's Principles of Forensic Medi- cine, 456 - 7 ; Taylor's Medical Jurisprudence, 237. If incised wounds be inflicted upon the body some twelve or more hours after death, their characteristics will be as follows : 1. The edges, instead of being everted, are in close proximi- ty, and are soft, yielding, and destitute of elasticity. The cellu- lar tissue around, is either not at all infiltrated with blood, or to a very limited extent. There is usually little or no bloody effu- sion, but whatever there is, is venous, proceeding from a divided vein. 2. The blood is fluid. As it falls on surrounding bodies, it forms no coagula. Neither are there any coagula between the lips of the wound. 3. There are, of course, no signs of inflammatory action. Guy's Principles of Forensic Medicine, 457 - 8. The difficulty, here, as in ecchymosis, consists in discriminating where the wound is inflicted soon after death, and while the body is still warm. Mr. Taylor has given the results of several experiments made by him upon limbs recently amputated. See Taylor, 238. In one case, an incision, three inches in length, was made in the calf of the leg, two minutes after its amputation. The skin retracted considerably, causing a protrusion of the adi- 216 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. pose substance beneath. But little blood escaped, owing, appa- rently, to the sudden protrusion forwards of the cellular mem- brane, mechanically preventing its exit. After the lapse of twenty-four hours, the edges were found red, bloody and evert- ed ; the skin not in the least degree tumefied, but merely a little flaccid. On separating the edges, a small quantity of fluid blood escaped, but no coagula were seen adhering to the muscles. At the bottom of the wound, in close contact with the fasciae, was a small quantity of coagulated blood ; but the coagula were so loose, as readily to break down under the finger. In another experiment, an incision of the same dimensions was made on the other side of the leg, penetrating through the peronei and into the flexor longus pollicis of the deep-seated layer of muscles, ten minutes after its separation from the body. In this case, scarcely any blood escaped, and the edges of the wound became but slightly everted, the skin appearing to have lost its elasticity. Twenty-four hours afterwards, the edges of the incision were pale, and perfectly collapsed, presenting none of the characters of a'wound inflicted during life. At the bot- tom of the wound, and enclosed by the divided muscular fibres, there were some coagula of blood, but fewer than in the other experiments. A portion of liquid blood had escaped, owing to the, leg having been moved. Other experiments were made after a longer period of time had elapsed, and the appearances were less distinctly marked. If the incision was not made until two or three hours after the removal of the limb, although -a small quantity of liquid blood was effused, no coagula were found. , "When the medical witness has an opportunity of examining the body previous to its removal and being washed, the quantity of blood lost by haemorrhage should be a special object of atten- tion. If the wound be the cause of death, whether immediate or after the lapse of some period of time, and that death arises from exhaustion, the quantity of blood effused will be very great, and the large vessels found comparatively empty ; whereas if the wound be inflicted soon after death, and while the body is still warm, the quantity will be small, unless the weapon happens to WOUNDS. . 217 cut a large vein, in which case the cause of the greater effusion may be attributed to that circumstance. It is not always, how- ever, that death from haemorrhage occurs in consequence of ex- haustion. It may arise from the effused blood being confined, so as mechanically to compress and impede the functions of some of those organs which are immediately necessary to life. There may be, for instance, an effusion of blood within the cranium, compressing the brain, within the spinal canal, into the pericar- dium or within the substance of the lungs ; all which may pro- duce death without any great quantity of haemorrhage. But in such cases it will be apparent from the locality of the heenior- rhage. A question in relation to the time of the infliction of a wound arose in the case of Greenacre, tried in 1837, for the murder and mutilation of a female. Taylor's Medical Jurisprudence, 238 - 9. The head was found severed from the body, and the question was, whether the severance took place during life or after death. The medical evidence went to show that the head was severed from the body while the female was alive, but probably after she had been rendered insensible by a blow on the head, the marks of which were visible. This evidence was founded on two circum- stances. 1. The muscles of the neck were found retracted, and 2d. The head was completely drained of its blood. The last furnished a strong inference ; for, although the severing of the head from the body after death, will be attended with some ef- fusion from the jugular veins, yet the quantity will not be suffi- cient materially to affect the contents of the cerebral vessels. In connection with the subject of haemorrhage, some attention should be bestowed upon the means of identifying spots of blood found on the body itself, on the soil, furniture or clothes, or on the instrument with which death has been inflicted. There is no direct chemical process by which blood can be identified. This renders it necessary, in cases of doubt and dif- ficulty, to resort to the physical character and appearances, and also the action of chemical agents. A small quantity of blood forms, on the surface of steel, a 218 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. transparent red spot ; a greater quantity a deep reddish brown crust. The crust scales off under a moderate heat, leaving a clean surface beneath. On placing it within a tube, and subject- ing it to a high v temperature, ammonia is given of, which will be rendered evident by its re-action on test-paper. Guy's Prin- ciples of Forensic Med., 458. We are indebted principally to the French medical jurists, for our knowledge of what light chemistry can throw over tl is sub- ject. ( In relation to steel instruments there are two kinds of spots resembling those of blood. These are 1 . Spots of lemon juice. The agent here is the citric acid. When the lemon juice is not wiped off the acid produces thin spots of a reddish yellow color, the thicker being of a reddish brown, nearly resembling those of blood. They separate, like blood spots, on the application of a moderate heat. Subjected to heat, a volatile matter is thrown off, having an acid re-action, while that from blood has an alkaline. Both are soluble in dis- tilled water, but the solution from the former is a light yellow ; that from the latter, red. ' That from the former has an acid re- action ; from the latter, neutral. Infusion of galls with the for- mer yields a black precipitate ; with the latter, a red. 2. Spots of rust. These are sometimes mistaken for blood. They resemble the lemon juice spots in color, but, unlike those, or spots of blood, they will not scale off on the application of heat. They resemble blood spots in giving off a sufficient quan- tity of ammonia, to have an alkaline re-action on test-paper, when subjected to heat in a glass tube. The blood spot is dissolved by maceration in water, while the rust spot is merely detached, and is capable of being completely separated by nitration, so as to leave the water quite clear, and unaffected by the tests of iron. Muriatic acid dissolves iron rust, leaving the metal clean ; the solution affording evidence of the existence of iron when subjected to the appropriate tests. The same effect is produced by the same agent on the lemon juice spot, but the blood spot is not removed, nor is the resulting so- lution affected by the tests for iron. If the instrument, having WOUNDS. 219 bloody spots upon it, has been long exposed to the air, spots of rust will be mixed with those of blood, and will be partially de- tached by maceration in water. They can, in such case, be readily separated by filtration. Another difficulty may present itself in determining whether appearances resembling spots of blood on clothes, are really ow- ing to blood or to madder, or some other coloring matter. It has been objected that a mixture of madder and albumen, possesses all the characters assigned to blood. Mr. Taylor asserts that mixtures of serum or albumen with cochineal, lac and madder, can in no respect, except in color, be confounded with blood ; that they can deceive no one who does not trust to the red color alone. Taylor's Med. Juris., 271 -2. The piece of linen or other stuff, on which the red spot is found, must be cut out and macerated in distilled water. " If the spot is of any thickness, the albumen or coloring matter, will separate and sink to the bottom of the liquid, while the fibrin adheres to the surface in the form of a white filamentary mass. If attempts have been made to remove the stain, or if it has been formed merely by contact with another stain, no fibrin will be found attached to the cloth." Gvy's Med. Juris., 459. The application of acids changes the color of madder to yellow, and that of alkalies to violet. A drop of the acetic acid will have this effect, but the blood spot will remain unaltered by it at a low temperature, and acquires a deep brownish hue by boiling. The coloring matter of blood in solution, remains unaltered on the addition of ammonia, and the albuminous part of the blood will be detected on boiling, or on the addition of a mineral acid. On macerating stains of blood and red dyes in water, the former are dissolved, while the latter remain unaffected. Guy's Principles of Forensic Medicine, 460. Simple maceration in cold water is the most effectual to remove a blood stain, but the process of re- moval is sometimes slow. Taylor's Med. Juris., 273. Iron moulds on linen have sometimes been mistaken for stains of blood. The distinction is easily made. The coloring matter of blood is discharged by water. That of iron is not. Muriatic 220 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. acid dissolves out the iron, which may be discovered by its cha- racteristics. Guy's Principles of Forensic Medicine, 460.- It has been made a question, if it be possible to tell from a blood stain, whether it be the blood of a man, or of some ani- mal. As the difference in the microscopic character is not suf- ficiently appreciable, except by the most experienced, and then must fail, unless the spots had been entirely undisturbed ; it has been proposed to adopt Barruel's aromatic test, and to attempt distinguishing by the characteristic odor given off on adding to the blood strong sulphuric acid. In the male, he finds the odor of perspiration ; in the female the same, but in a less degree. In the horse, that of horse dung ; and so also with sheep, the ox, dog, &c. Taylor's Med. Juris., 275 ; 2 Beck's Med. Juris., 92-3. It is now very generally conceded that this test, and these means of distinguishing, are altogether too uncertain to be relied upon in judicial proceedings. The remote effect, or consequence, resulting from wounds of the second class, is inflammation. This is rendered evident principally by the presence in the part of pain, preternatural heat and swelling. The fact of inflammation, resulting, as it does, from living reaction, is of course evidence that the wound was inflicted during life. Lacerated wounds combine, to a considerable extent, the cha- racters both of incised and contused wounds. They are accom- panied with less haemorrhage than the incised, and with some of the discoloration of the contused. They are more generally the result of accident than design, and not unfrequently indicate, by their appearance, the means by which they were produced. Punctured wounds occupy an intermediate space between in- cised and lacerated wounds. When inflicted with a sharp in- strument, and attended by profuse hsemorrhage, they resemble the former ; but when caused by a blunt instrument, and accom- panied by slight effusion of blood, they are more like the latter They are not unfrequently more dangerous than incised wounds, because they penetrate deeper, and divide imperfectly the nervous filaments . and aponeurotic parts, affording a less free egress to matter effused from them. WOUNDS. 221 The considerations connected with sword and gun-shot wounds' are reserved to the. fourth general topic, or that of medico-legal questions. III. Wounds as they affect the several parts and systems of the body. This may be made the subject of very extended remark, and, even with a consistent degree of brevity, will claim considerable consideration. 1 . Wounds of the head, injuries of the brain, spinal cord and nervous system. These should be considered, because they are of frequent occurrence ; and either cause death or produce ef- fects dangerous to life ; and are often the subjects of medico- le- gal examination. Wounds of the head may either injure the integuments, frac- ture the cranial bones, or penetrate into and injure the substance of the brain. An injury to the integuments may be followed by an erysipelatous inflammation, or by inflammation of the occi- pito-froritalis tendon. The danger is less from incised wounds than from punctured and contused, as punctures may injure the tendon, and contusions disorganize the texture of the skin. A contused wound, if accompanied with much laceration of the in- teguments, is always dangerous on account of the tendency to erysipelatous inflammation. The same remark applies to wounds of the integumentary parts as to all other parts of the head, viz : that all prognosis in reference to them must be extremely uncertain. Those which apparently inflict but a slight injury, may be attended with fatal results, while those which seem much more severe, often turn out perfectly harmless. Simple fractures of the cranial bones, which are attended with no injury to the membranes, afe not usually followed by any dan- gerous consequences. A blow suflicient to cause a fracture,, may also produce concussion or other injury of the brain. It is im- portant to notice that the injured part of the bone may feel de- pressed, from the fact that the outer table may be driven into the diplce, while the inner one and the brain remain uninjured. The 222 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. brain, in such a case, is less liable to suffer from concussion, as the force of the blow is expended upon the fracture. It is also important to notice, that the fracture is not always found in that part of the skull on which the blow was inflicted. The skull having the form of an arch, a blow upon one part of it, is not unlikely to produce the fracture at the part directly opposite. Hence, a blow on the vertex, will often occasion a fracture at the base of the skull ; and that more particularly when the force is applied at once to a large surface. Fractures at the base, occurring before re-action of the occi- put upon the atlas, occasioned by violence applied at the top of the head, or in whatever other way produced, are more danger- ous than fractures of any other part, for the reason that they are very generally accompanied with a laceration of the brain at its base, or an effusion of blood which compresses it at this vital part, where many of the nerves take their rise. Watson on Horn., 58. In such cases, bleeding from the ears is often observed, which is attributable to injury of the lateral sinuses. Fractures of the skull are often found to be greatly dispro- portioned to the amount of force used. The same degree of force will cause different extents of fracture when applied to different parts. This is caused principally by the varying thickness of the skull. A blow on the temple, for example, would produce much greater injury than one of equal force applied to other parts of the cranium. So, also, the orbitar plate offers another point easily injured; and the cribriform plate of the ethmoid bone is fractured by a smaller amount of force than any other parts. The brain itself may receive injury from three prominent causes. These are, concussion, compression, and inflammation. 1 . Concussion. This may arise from a severe blow or a violent shock. When it is violent, the symptoms follow immediately, death occurring without re-action. There are several instances of death from this cause, where no lesion of the brain could be discovered ; where there was even no fracture, no effusion, or ■iny lesion to be found on dissection. This is more likely wounds. 223 to happen where death is the immediate result of the injury. A shock is given to the "whole nervous organ, which, being un- relieved, speedily lapses into annihilation of function." " A prize fighter was taken off the ground insensible, and ap- parently apoplectic, and died in eight hours. No lesion or extra- vasation could be discovered on careful inspection of the brain." Blows on the head with the fist may cause concussion, and are not unfrequently made medico-legal subjects of inquiry. In such cases, the person on whom the injury is inflicted, is generally knocked down, and falls upon the ground with some degree of violence. It may hence be doubtful whether the blow, or the fall, caused the concussion. In such cases, if there is effused blood within the cranium, an indication may be drawn from the place where it is found. It will be found opposite to, and cor- responding with, the external mark of injury, whether resulting from the blow or fall. In such cases, however, the culpability of the assailant is generally the same. Where concussion is not the immediate cause of death, it may ultimately produce it from an effusion of blood occurring from the ruptured vessels, or from inflammatory effusion or softening of the brain. In such cases, no immediate inconvenience may arise from the injury; but after the lapse of some days, or even weeks, symptoms of compression or inflammation of the brain may supervene, which may result in death after intervals of days, weeks, months, or even years. Hoffbauer mentions a case where a death from concussion took place eleven years after the receipt of the injury. In the case mentioned by Mr. Potts, the woman who received the injury on the head remained well for twelve days. She then fell ill, and died with symptoms of com- pression of the brain. The ventricles were found to contain bloody serum, and a small coagulum of blood. A girl fell from a swing, striking her head violently against the ground. Sh<> complained of headache for six weeks after; then came feverish symptoms, followed by slight delirium and coma. She died in two months after the fall. The ventricles were found distended with serous fluid, but no other morbid appearances presented In cases of chronic inflammation following concussion, the person 224 MEDICAL JURISPRl-DEIKCE. may suffer from pain in the head and vomiting. Gw/s Principles of Forensic Medicine, 482-3 ; Taylor's Med. Juris., 304 ; Watscn on Horn., 46-7. The most prominent symptoms of concussion are immediate stunning and insensibility, accompanied with headache, a small, weak and irregular pulse ; as also coldness of the extremities and surface of the body ; sometimes attended with delirium, at others with syncope and convulsions. There appears to be a depression of the vital powers by which the blood is circulated, which occasions syncope and death. Simple concussion is dis- tinguished from compression and inflammation, by the weakness and irregularity of the pulse, vomiting and coldness, which ac- companies the insensibility in the former ; while in compression, there is a full, strong, and often irregidar pulse, natural heat of the body, relaxation of the muscles, dilatation of the pupilfi, stertorous breathing, and paralysis. Watson on Horn., 31 — 34 . 2. Compression. This may result from concussion, in either of two ways : 1. By a portion of the bone becoming depressed into the brain : or, 2. By an effusion of blood or serum into its substance. When produced by the cause first mentioned, and death fohWs, there is usually no difficulty, as' the cause will be clearly revealed on post-mortem examination. When death follows compression, resulting from the second cause, it is very possible to urge that the effusion of blood or serum is due to some condition of the system, or to some cause other than the injury. Guy, 483. The conditions of the system favorable to effusion are, habits of intoxication, a plethoric habit, an apoplectic make, advanced .age, intense excitement arising out of a contest ; and more espe- cially, a diseased state of the vessels of the brain. These will come more especially to be considered, when we investigate the question of the cause of death. Compression from either of the causes enumerated, is attend- ed with the same symptoms. These consist of insensibility, coma, so deep that the sufferer cannot be aroused from it, palsy, slow but otherwise natural pulse, stertorous breathing, dilated wounds. 225 pupils. These are sometimes followed by sudden death; bur more commonly, death does not take place until after the lapse of one, two, or several days. Watson on Horn., 58. The effect of the concussion, by depressing the state of the circulation, will produce, at first, a slow effusion of blood from the ruptured vessels. When re-action takes place, the quantity of effused blood becomes greater, lb., 52. The points to be noted, in cases where death results from com- pression caused by effusion, are, the age and habits of the de- ceased, the condition of his system, whether plethoric or other- wise, his make, his state of excitement at the time, the healthy or diseased condition of the vessels of the brain, and the rela- tion which the effusion bears to the external injury. In refe- rence to the latter point, it may be remarked here, that the prin- ciple formerly brought to view in the case of fractures, is again disclosed in the case of injuries to the brain, viz., that the injury is not always found under the spot where the blow was inflicted, but often, by counter-stroke, on the surface of the brain directly opposite. 3. Inflammation. Inflammation and its consequences are likely to follow, when injuries to the brain are not immediately fatal. They may follow slight injuries as well as severe ; and those, not only of the organ itself, but also of its common integuments. The time, after the injury, at which the inflammation occurs, is exceedingly various. It sometimes sets in after one or two days ; in others, after one or two weeks ; in others still, it proceeds for several months, insidiously, without affording distinct indications of its existence, until near the approach of a fatal termination. In general, it does not supervene until one week after the acci- dent, nor can the person injured be considered out of danger un- til two or three weeks after the injury. Watson on Hem., 01 -2 ; Guy's Principles of Forensic Medicine, 484. A case is given in "Watson on Homicide, C3, which may illus- trate the principle of the supervention of inflammation : «T. Kerr, aged 22, was struck on the forehead with a hoe, caus- ing a compound, comminuted and depressed fracture of the 15 226 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. skull. On the day after receiving the injury, Kerr was brought to the Royal Infirmary. He walked up stairs to his bed, and did not seem very ill. Symptoms of inflammation came on, and he died seven days after the injury. On dissection, there was in- flammation of the membranes, and an abscess in the substance of the brain, below the seat of the injury. The symptoms indicating inflammation either of the brain 01 its membranes, are, fever, pain of head, flushing of face, delirium, quick and sharp pulse ; and when the inflammation has advanced to the effusion of lymph, or suppuration, these symptoms are followed by rigor, convulsions, stupor, insensibility, coma and death. Watson on Horn., 62. It should be remarked, that ir juries of the head may at first appear of very little consequence ; but, after a considerable in- terval, dangerous symptoms may arise, and prove fatal. Guyh Principles of Forensic Medicine, 484. Injuries to the spinal cord are not of such frequent occurrence as to become often the subjects of medico-legal investigation, as this part is extremely well protected from external violence. The medulla oblongata may be wounded, or compressed by bloody effusion, or by fracture and dislocation of the vertebra, and instant death caused in consequence of the suspension of the circulation and respiration. The penetration of this part with a very small instrument speedily occasions death. An effu- sion of blood at the base of the cranium, may compress this part, and thus quickly occasion death. Injuries to the spinal cord will vary in their effects according to the degree of violence used, and the part of the spine which has been wounded. When deeply penetrated, or severely in- jured, at its upper part, death takes place immediately. Such a result may be anticipated, when the wound is above the third cervical vertebrae. If the neck is bent forward, a fatal wound may be very easily inflicted here, and yet leave but a trifling ex- ternal mark of injury. Injuries to the spinal cord may arise from falls or blows, the most commonly inflicted on the head or lower part of the spina' wounds. 227 column. Injuries inflicted upon the middle or lower portion of the spinal cord, are attended with a loss of power and sensation in the parts below the seat of the injury, and also with a dis- turbance of the functions of the viscera, which sooner or later proves fatal. Injuries which produce neither fracture nor dislo- cation, may occasion death by causing inflammation and soften- ing of the spinal cord. Guy's Principles of Forensic Medicine, 484 ; Watson on Horn., 68 - 9 ; Taylor's Med. Juris., 313-14. Wounds of the face. Injuries to the face may produce deformi- ty, and thus result in a damage much greater than the injury actually experienced. This is the most likely to occur when the wound is deep-seated. The distribution of important nerves over the face creates a source of danger to be apprehended from wounds there, which does not exist in many other parts of the body. There is also much danger resulting from the near prox- imity of the principal features to the brain. In several instances, trials for murder have taken place, in which the death has been caused by a penetrating wound of the orbit, fracturing the orbi- tar plate, and injuring that organ. It is not even absolutely necessary that the orbitar plate should be fractured or perforated ; but a severe injury there, unattended with fracture or perforation, has caused a fatal inflammation of the brain. Guy's Principles of Forensic Medicine, 484-5 ; Taylor's Med. Juris., 311. Wounds of the throat and neck. may become subjects of medico- legal enquiw. The infliction of these, is a mode of death select- ed by many suicides. The murderer sometimes inflicts them, in the hope that they may be attributed to suicide. Wounds on the side of the neck are generally less dangerous than those on the anterior part of the throat. The danger to be apprehended is derived from two sources, viz., the position of the wound and the parts that are injured by it. Wounds inflicted on the lower part of the throat are less dangerous than those of the upper part. A section of the carotid artery is almost invariably fatal, and that almost instantaneously, from the excessive haemorrhage. There are one or two rare cases on record, where immediate ana continued pressure has succeeded in stopping the haemorrhage 228 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. sufficient to save life. A division of the internal jugular vein is about on the same footing as that of the carotid artery. Wounds of the pharynx and oesophagus are dangerous for two reasons ; one is, that the nourishment of the system must be carried on through them, and deglutition, by the motion it ren- ders necessary, is opposed to an adhesion of the parts ; the other is, that other important parts are generally injured along with them. A wound of the larynx is likely to have an injurious effect on the voice, deranging or weakening it. The trachea may be partially divided, without being attended with much danger. There is always a difficulty in its healing, from the opposition re- sulting from its unquiet state to any re-union of the parts. A complete division of it is generally mortal. Guy's Prin. of Foren. Med., 485 -6 ; 2 Beck's Med. Juris., 206, 7, 8. Wounds of the chest or thorax may be either contused or incised. The danger in case of the former is generally in a ratio to the degree of violence used. Injuries of this kind may prove fatal either, 1 . From syncopal asphyxia, or the depression of the con- stitution resulting from the shock ; or, 2. From the inflammation and fever occasioned by the violence. Injuries of this descrip- tion are very generally accompanied by fractures of the ribs or sternum ; or by a rupture of some of the viscera within the cavity ; by a profuse haemorrhage ; or by subsequent inflamma- tion of the organs. The danger resulting from fractur* of the ribs, will depend very much upon whether they are splintered by the fracture, and the points driven inwards, so that they are not reducible. In such a case there is usually a fatal termination. A greater degree of violence is required to fracture the upper ribs than the lower, and hence more danger is to be apprehended from fractures of the former than the latter. Fracture of the sternum may be accompanied with such a degree of concussion as to disturb the internal organs, or the bone may be depressed as well as fractured ; in which case great danger is to be appre- hended from injuries done to the viscera behind it. Otherwise the fracture of this bone may not be considered as dangerous. Taylor's Med. Juris., 314-15; Watson on Horn., 179; 2 Beck's Med. Juris., 209. wounds. 229 The danger resulting from incised wounds will depend upon the direction taken by the weapon or instrument inflicting them, and the consequent injury done to the contained viscera. The chances are, that the lungs or heart will be injured, and that the rupture of some blood vessel may give rise to internal hemor- rhage, which will be likely to have a fatal termination. The lungs are subject to concussion termed wind concussion, which is usually fatal. Incised wounds of the lungs are attended with a degree of haemorrhage depending upon the size and im- portance of the ruptured blood vessel. As the great mass of the blood circulates through the pulmonary vessels for the purpose of oxygenation, it will be readily perceived, that the rupture of one of those vessels, especially if it be one of the larger trunks, will cause the individual very speedily to sink. The quantity of blood escaping from the wound, is here no criterion of the extent of the injury. It may be also discharged by expectora- tion, or it may accumulate in the cavity of the pleura, until it excludes the respiratory process. One of the criteria by which a wound of the lungs may be known, is the fro thin ess and florid color of the blood which issues from the orifice or is expectorated. The expectoration of it is also another indication. An injury to the substance of the lung is not necessarily fatal. Portions of lung have been entirely removed, and a recovery, nevertheless, taken place ; and a bullet enclosed in a cyst has remained in the substance of the lung for years. Guy's Principles of Forensic Medicine, 487 ; Taylor's Med. Juris., 315 ; 2 Beck's Med. Juris., 209-10. The heart is also liable to be injured by a penetrating wound in the thorax. All wounds of this organ were formerly con- sidered as necessarily mortal, and that too with very little delay. A more widely extended knowledge, however, has settled the point, that they are not necessarily immediately fatal. Some even appear to be not necessarily mortal. The manner of occa- sioning death is almost invariably by haemorrhage. The rapidity and extent of this will depend very much upon the position and circumstances attending the wound. "Wounds of the base are less speedily fatal than those of the apex ; superficial, less so than 230 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. those which penetrate the cavities. Wounds which are parallel to the axis of the heart are less rapidly fatal than those which are transverse to it. Wounds of the ventricles are less rapidly fatal than those of the auricles. A weapon may pass so obliquely through the parieties, that the flap may act like a valve ; or the presence of the weapon in the wound, may mechanically obstruct the effusion of blood ; and thus in each case, the fatal result will be retarded. All these circumstances render the time very uncertain at which death occurs. In one case, a soldier had the apex of the heart cut with a long and slender sword, and survived twelve • hours ; the heart, at every stroke, losing a small quantity of blood, till, at the expiration of that time, there was a sufficient quantity entirely to fill the chest, and he died of suffocation. In another case, the point of the sword cut the coronary artery, which threw out its blood so slowly, that two hours elapsed be- fore the pericardium filled with blood, when, after great anxiety, he died. There have been instances of recovery from wounds of the heart, but they are very rare, and generally under peculiar circumstances. Taylor's Med. Juris., 315-16 ; Guy's Principles of Forensic Medicine, 487-8 ; 2 Beck's Med. Juris., 210-11. Wounds of the large arteries and veins around the heart are necessarily mortal. Wounds of the thoracic duct are mortal from the extravasation of its contents. Those of the cesophagus would be likely to be so, as the passage of food would be pre- vented, and the function of nutrition impeded or destroyed The diaphragm may be wounded by a weapon penetrating either the thorax or abdomen ; but it is seldom injured by any weapon without an injury occurring also to sprue of the impor- tant organs that are in contact with it. A puncture of the diaphragm alone is not necessarily attended with fatal consequences, although it may be fatal in its ultimate results, as it is sometimes followed by hernia of , the stomach. The most serious wounds of the diaphragm are those produced by violent contusions. A severe blow or fall may rupture it, and this will occur the most readily while the stomach and viscera are distended. In such cases the muscular fibres are generally WOUNDS. 231 found ruptured. The death may occur immediately from a fata] shock to the nervous system. It may also occur after a consider- able interval, from a protrusion of the viscera of the abdomen into the chest, thus disturbing the functions of the organs con- tained in those cavities. . Guy's Principles of Forensic Medicine. 488 - 9 ; Taylor's Med. Juris., 318 - 19. Wounds of the abdomen may arise either from contusion or in- cision. Contused wounds of the abdomen are generally more dangerous than those of the thorax, as the abdominal parieties have less power to resist external shocks. Incised and punctured wounds, without even penetrating the cavity, maj r prove fatal by wounding the epigastric artery. Their danger, however, usu- ally arises from touching the peritoneum, or injuring one or more of the viscera contained in the abdomen. In the latter case particularly, very difficult medico-legal questions may arise. Wounds in the region of the abdomen may prove dangerous in a variety of ways as, 1. By the shock made upon the nervous system. 2. By the haemorrhage which results from them. 3. By subsequently occurring inflammation. 4. By preventing the nutrition of the body, or other conse- quences remote from the time of the injury. Severe and even slight blows on the region of the stomach may produce death immediately, without' any lesion of the internal organs, or- subsequent inflammation. " A man walking through Fleet-street, happened to quarrel with a woman, when another came up and gave him a blow in the region of the stomach, which caused almost instantaneous death. On dissection, no cause could be found to account for his sudden death." Dr. Holland maintains that in such a case, the fatal result is attributable to the sudden propulsion of arterial blood into the left ventricle ; this retrograde movement so overpowering the action of the heart as to cause death. By others it has been generally ascribed to the shock transmitted to the system, through a violent impres- sion produced on the solar plexus. , There are also other instances, where the internal organs, as the stomach, intestines, gall bladder, or urinary organs are per- 232 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. forated, and their contents become extravasated into the perito- neal cavity. In such cases, such intense pain is immediately oc- casioned, that, before inflammation begins, and without hsemor- rhage, the powers of the nervous system become depressed, and death occurs by the failure of the action of the heart. There are also instances where blows, and other injuries of the abdomen, have proved fatal by inducing inflammation, although the internal organs are not injured. A death was caused by blows inflicted on the abdomen with fists, and a kick on the right groin ; and on dissection, the peritoneum was found much inflamed, and covered with purulent effusion. There are also other instances where, from a rupture of the intestinal canal, or other viscera of the abdomen, an effusion of foreign matter takes place into the peritoneal cavity, causing vio- lent inflammation, and attended with so great a depression of the nervous energy, that death very soon follows. In such cases there is a feeble pulse, feeling of depression, exhausted look, coldness of the surface and extremities, and collapsed appear- ance, indicating great depression of the action of the heart through the medium of the nervous system. It should be con- stantly kept in view, that a rupture of some part of the bowels may occur spontaneously, and that even without previous dis- ease. Penetrating wounds of the abdomen are not always fatal ; and even wounds of the stomach are not necessarily so, many cases of recovery being recorded, when the wound was extensive, and the stomach, at the time, distended with food. Watson on Horn. 183, et seq ; Guy's Principles of Forensic Medicine, 489 ; Tay- lor's Med. Juris., 319 -20 ; 2 Beck's Med. Juris., 213-14. Wounds of the intestines, may prove injurious in many of the ways already mentioned ; more generally, however, by hsemor- rhage, effusion of contents, and inflammation. They are by no means necessarily fatal, and in the absence of extravasation, there is a fair chance of recovery, as coagulable lymph easily be- comes effused and organized about the edges of the incision. Wounds of the smaller intestines are more dangerous than those of the large, as they are supplied with a greater number of wounds. 233 nerves, have more important functions confided to them, and there is much more danger of extravasation of their contents, being in a more fluid state. So also wounds of the duodenum are more dangerous than those of the other small intestines. Guy's Principles of Forensic Medicine, 490 ; 2 Beck's Med. Juris.) 216. Wounds of the liver may occur from rupture, or from pene- trating instruments. The former may be occasioned by blows or falls ; or it may happen, (as occurred to an individual who was endeavoring to avoid a fall from his horse,) merely by a very sudden action of the abdominal muscles. The rupture generally appears on the convex surface, running from before backwards with a small obliquity, the lacerated edges slightly separated, and the surfaces presenting a granular appear- ance. Ruptures are generally more certainly fatal than penetrat- ing wounds. The latter, if extending to any depth, may prove fatal by dividing some of the large vessels. In other cases, dan- ger may arise from inflammation of the organ. Guy's Principles of Forensic Medicine, 489 ; Taylor's Med. Juris., 320-21. Wounds of the gall bladder are generally fatal, owing to the ex- travasation of bile inducing peritonitis. Wounds of the spleen are very similar to those of the liver. When deep, they usually prove fatal from hemorrhage. When superficial, they usually admit of recovery. Guy's Principles of Forensic Medici7ie, 489 ; 2 Beck's Med. Juris., 218. Wounds of the kidneys are the most likely to arise from blows and stabs in the loins. The dangers to be apprehended from penetrating wounds, are haemorrhage, extravasation of urine, and inflammation. Wounds of these organs are not necessarily fatal, and there are many chances of recovery, provided the ef- fusion of urine into the peritoneal cavity can be prevented. Guy's Prin. of For. Med., 490-2 ; 2 Beck's Med. Juris., 218. Wounds of the bladder are the most likely to occur as the re- sult of blows on the lower part of the abdomen. Rupture may also be caused by an accidental fall. The part of it most subject to rupture is the upper and posterior, where the organ is co- vered by the peritoneum. The general effect is, that the urine 234 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. becomes extravasated, and death takes place as the result of pe ritoneal inflammation. The time at which the fatal termination occurs, is usually from three to seven days, occasionally longer. One fact to be specially noticed is, that a rupture may be caused Dy a blow so severe in its consequences as to produce death, and yet no mark of ecchymosis or injury to the skin be visible. This furnishes a very plausible defence, and should certainly lead to a more thorough examination of the part, to determine whether some diseased condition may not have led to a spontaneous rup- ture. The medical jurist must, however, be aware, that, owing to the yielding and elastic nature of the parieties, ruptures of the viscera of the abdomen from violence, may take place with- out such ecchymosis or marks of injury. Spontaneous eruption may be very reasonably expected to occur, where a paralysis de- prives of the power to expel the urine, or where the bladder is diseased, or some obstruction exists in the urethra. A blow will seldom, if ever, produce rupture of the bladder, unless it be distended with urine, which is at times its natural condition: The pressure of the child's head during parturition, may occasion rupture of the bladder. This, in England, has furnished the occasion for a case of mal-practice. The danger may be avoided by the use of the catheter. Ruptures of the bladder are com- monly attended with intense pain, sickness, and prostration of strength. The cavity of the pelvis is very frequently the reci- pient of extravasated blood, or other fluids, that may escape in consequence of wounds, or other injuries, to the abdominal viscera. Taylor's Med. Juris., 322, et seq; Guy's Principles of Forensic Medicine, 490. Wounds of the genitals may be dangerous from the profuse haemorrhage that sometimes follows. But for the danger arising from this cause, the penis, and even the entire male genitals, may be removed, without being followed by a fatal result. They have in many instances been so, and yet a complete recovery taken place. There have been instances where lunatics and idiots have removed them, and in some cases others, as in the case of Origen, from conscientious motives ; and yet have sur- vived, although the haemorrhage may have been quite profuse wounds. 235 The entire removal of the testicles appears to be less dangerous than a severe contusion or bruising them, which may prove fa- tal by the shock communicated to the nervous system. Deep wounds of the labia of the female are dangerous from haemor- rhage. Taylor's Med. Juris., 224 ; 2 Beck's Med. Juris., 220. Wounds of the extremities are not generally to be considered as dangerous. When only the integuments, and the first layer of muscular fibres are wounded, they will heal without difficulty. Injuries inflicted on the tendons, are generally very slow in heal- ing, and can often be only imperfectly healed. Compound frac- tures are sometimes hazardous, and comminuted, extremely te- dious in curing. All fractures are much more easily healed in young than in old persons. 2 Beck's Med. Juris., 221 . Equal de - grees of force will more readily produce fractures in the old than in the young, and in the young rather than in the adult. There are also certain diseases, such as syphilis, arthritis, cancer, scurvy, and rachitis, that render the bones fragile, and much more liable to fracture from the same degree of force. Success- ful defences have sometimes been sustained upon this abnormal condition of the bones. Some bones, such as the olecranon, os calcis and patella, have at times been fractured by violent mus- cular exertion alone, but this can seldom happen to the long bones. Taylor's Med. Juris., 325. IV. General medico-legal questions that may arise in the in- vestigation of all the wounds, however or wherever inflicted, including the legal principles applicable to this head. Under this division arise a great many interesting subjects of inquiry. These, as far as possible, should be presented in a natural order. They are the following : 1. What was the weapon with which the wound was inflicted, and what are the questions generally arising in the case of sword and gun-shot wounds 1 2. Was the wound self-inflicted or accidental, or the act of another 1 3. What circumstances can be gathered relative to the motive or intent of the inflictor 1 236 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. 4. What acts indicate volition or locomotion after the infliction of mortal wounds 1 5. How long has the wound been inflicted 1 6. Was the wound the direct cause of death 1 7. What are the circumstances that modify the medicolegal character of wounds, and that vary the liability of the inflictor 1 8. What are the questions that arise in the case of maiming? 9. How should the medico-legal examination of wounds be conducted 1 1 . What was the weapon with which the wound was inflicted, and what are the questions generally arising in the case of sword and gun-shot wounds 1 It may become important, for many reasons, to ascertain the kind of weapon by w'hich the wound was inflicted. It may be a means of identifying the murderer. It may serve to qualify, in some measure, the nature of the action, rendering it murder- ous or not, according to the weapon made use of. Murder, in the State of New-York, may consist in killing another, either 1 . From a premeditated design to effect the particular death effected, or any death : 2. When the death is perpetrated by any act imminently dan- gerous to others, and evincing a depraved mind, regardless of human life, although without any premeditated design to effect the death of any particular individual : 3. When it is perpetrated without any design to effect death, by a person engaged in the commission of any felony. The character of an act imminently dangerous to others, and evincing a depraved mind, regardless of human life, can be, to a considerable extent, identified by a reference to the instrument used, coupled, also, with the manner of using it. Hence, so far as these are to be inferred from the nature of the wound, medi cal testimony will go towards identifying the crime of which the person committing it may have been guilty. In the case of The People vs. Rector, for the murder of Shep- ard, tried some years since in the city of Albany, the prisoner was charged and found guilty, on one trial, of perpetrating that crime, because he made use of the bar by which his door was wounds. 237 fastened, striking the deceased with it a blow or two en the head, in such a manner, and under such circumstances, as that the act was imminently dangerous, and evinced a depraved mind, regardless of human life. It was claimed in defence, that the injury which caused the death was not inflicted by the blow, but arose from the fall of the deceased on the side-walk or curb- stone. The probable manner, force, and weapon employed, are to be collected from the nature and extent of the wounds inflicted, judging from the known effects ot certain weapons when applied with different degrees of force. Watson on Horn., 252. The remarks to be offered in the discussion of this question, wfll be the best arranged under three heads, viz., those affecting contused, incised and gunshot wounds. 1. Contused. The variety of means by which contused wounds may be inflicted, the diversity of instruments that may be em- ployed in their infliction, and the varying degrees of force that may have been made use of, all create a greater difficulty in as- certaining the manner of their infliction, and the weapon which had been employed, than is found to exist in any other class of injuries. It is not easy, it is often impossible, to say whether such a wound has resulted from a weapon, or a blow of the fist, or from the person injured having fallen against a hard body. There are but few indications that can enable a witness to say, that a wound on the head was produced by a weapon, and' not by a fall. If the wound be inflicted on the top of the head, it is probably produced by the use of a weapon. So also if there be contused wounds on several parts of the head, with copious effu- sion of blood beneath the skin. Taylor's Med. Juris., 249. It is possible to infer,, to some extent, how the injury had been inflicted, from the superficial or deep seated character of the contusion. If a stone is struck smartly with a small hammer, the blow is principally expended on the surface, while the inte- rior remains uninjured. But if the same is struck a slow, heavy blow, with a ponderous hammer, the force penetrates the interior, and shivers its centre, producing little or no injury of the surface. This principle applied to contusions on the human body justifies 238 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. the general inference, that contusions of a superficial character have been inflicted by the smart stroke of a comparatively light body, while those which are deeper seated have been occasioned by heavy blows from a more ponderous weapon. Watson on Horn., 253-4. It is much upon this principle, that we can explain the fact heretofore mentioned, that there are many instances on re- cord where death has resulted from a violent contusion, without leaving any external mark of injury. 2. Incised, including punctured wounds. In this class, a close attention to the nature of the wound will justify an inference as to the probable weapon by which it was inflicted. Reference must be had more particularly to its form, the appearance of its edges, its situation, extent, and termination. Watson on Horn., 255. Punctured wounds generally take the shape of the instrument by which they are caused. This, however, is not always true, as a cylindrical pointed weapon may produce elongated wounds, having two edges, the direction of the wound being the same as that of the muscular fibres of the part. The wound is more usually round where there is much adipose matter. In stabs or sword thrusts, the form and depth of the wound will generally indicate the kind of weapon employed. These are ap- parently smaller than the weapon, owing to the elasticity of the skin. In those sword thrusts, or stabs, that have traversed the body, it is important to notice that the entrance aperture is gene- rally larger than that of the exit. The edges of the former are sometimes found everted, owing to the rapid withdrawal of the instrument. Taylor's Med. Juris., 248. In incised wounds, the cleanness and regularity with which the edges are cut, will furnish an inference in regard to the sharp- ness of the instrument ; and in the case of a punctured or an incised wound, it is important to ascertain the situation of the edges, to see whether they are lacerated and irregular, or clean cut, indicating that a sharp instrument has been employed. The defence interposed not unfrequently is, that the deceased had fallen on glass or some other substance that had caused the in jury- wounds. 239 A case, strikingly illustrating this, is cited by Mr. Watscn, that of Mrs. Pollock, page 256. On examining the body, and sepa- rating the labia pudendi, a wound about an inch and a quarter in length was found upon the inner side of the right nympha. It was a clean, straight incision, and internally admitted the in- troduction of the finger in four different directions to the depth of about two and a half inches each. In each direction the wound had nearly the same diameter, and an obtuse termination. None of the large vessels had been wounded, nor the peritoneum penetrated. The indications afforded by the cleanness of the cut, the obtuse termination of the wounds, their small depth, and the absence of any injury of the important neighboring parts, all pointed to an instrument having a sharp edge and a round or blunt point. The medical witnesses, therefore, had little doubt but that this instrument was a razor, and in confirmation of their conclusion, one was afterwards found, concealed in a piece of cloth, having its. blade and handle covered with blood. One of the defences here interposed was, that the deceased had fallen upon a piece of broken earthen-ware and cut herself; but the answer made was, that in such a case the wound would have been a lacerated one ; of no great depth, not larger internally than externally, in no part greater than the size of the wounding body, and probably not having different directions internally. In the case of Mrs. Calderhead, also stated by Mr. Watson, page 258 - 9, the death was caused by the haemorrhage, which proceeded from a wound upon the middle of the left labium pu- dendi. It was a clean incision about three-quarters of an inch in length, having a straight direction parallel with the margin of the labium. The wound consisted of a bloody cavity, from which the finger passed to a greater depth in three different di- rections. The greatest depth was between two and three inches. The divided vessels, and the internal surface of the wound, had the appearance of having been very clean cut by a sharp instru- ment. Near her was found some pieces of a broken wine glass, and the question was whether the wound could have been occa sioned by her falling upon these broken pieces of glass. For the reasons assigned, it was judged by the medical witnesses t( U 240 , MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. scarcely possible, and very improbable, that the wound could have been thus produced ; and from the straight, clean incision, the length, extent and cleanness of the wound internally, and its different directions, it was rendered very evident that the instru- ment was a knife, and that the wound was produced by several tirusts of it, each varying in the direction taken. In another case, one man was struck by another and knocked against a window. No weapon had been seen in the hand of the prisoner, but there were three deep cuts on the face of the de- ceased. The medical witness deposed that the wounds appeared to have been inflicted by a knife or razor blade, and that no par- ticles of glass had been found in the wounds, as would have been likely to have been the case had they been inflicted by the broken glass. Wounds made by glass are characterised by their great irregularity and the unevenness of their edges. Taylor's Med. Juris., 248. 3. Gun-shot wounds. Many questions may arise, and some of a very difficult nature, in cases of gun-shot wounds. They are of the contused kind, but differ from that class generally, in hav- ing the vitality of the part struck destroyed, leading rapidly to the process of sloughing. Taylor's Med. Juris., 328. A gun-shot wound can, in general, be easily distinguished from any other. The death resulting from it may proceed from the haemorrhage or shock. Unless some large blood vessel happens to be severed, or torn by the ball or shot, the haemorrhage is not likely to be very extensive. Death is sometimes occasioned by the shock given to the nervous system, as in the case of Daly, (Taylor, 328,) who died in a few seconds, the bullet having tra- versed the distended stomach at the cardiac end from behind forwards. One of the questions the most frequently arising, is, was the wound inflicted before or after death 1 This is extremely diffi- cult to answer. If the ball has struck and injured a large blood vessel, the haemorrhage, and formation of coagula, may afford a pretty clear indication that it was inflicted during life. A ball penetrating a body after death, would cause no haemorrhage, un- less it happened to wound a large vein. If the ball, in its rvi'rse, ros. 211 has injured no large vessel, the simple inspection of the wound will hardly enable the medical witness to say whether the wound was inflicted previous or subsequent to death. Another question frequently arising is, was the ball fired near the deceased, or from a distance 1 When the muzzle of the piece is placed near the surface of the body of the deceased, the fol- lowing are the characteristics of the wound, as given by Dever- gie. Taylors Medical Jurisprudence, 329. 1. A superficial bluish color of the skin, arising from the con- tusion caused by the explosion : 2. Particles of charcoal and ignited powder imbedded in the skin : 3. Slight burning : 4. Coagulation of blood, mixed with the powder, on the lips of the wound. If the muzzle be in direct contact, the skin will be found torn and lacerated, in addition to being burnt ; but if not, the wound will exhibit a rounded appearance. This rounded appearance, however, will not be presented, unless the ball strike the body at right-angles, or nearly so. If it strike it obliquely, the orifice is of an oval or valvular form ; and this may furnish something of an indication relative to the position occupied by the assailing party. The parts of the body traversed by the ball, and the varying degrees of resistance interposed, may afford some indication as to the distance from which it was fired. As the force will be so much modified by the strength of the charge, this, perhaps, should be but little relied upon. If fired from a moderate dis- tance, the entrance hole will be found well defined, round or oval; the skin slightly depressed inwards, the edges being in- verted, and presenting a faint bruised appearance. The exit hole is considerably larger, sometimes three or four times, than the entrance; more irregular, the edges being everted, and the skin lacerated, but free from marks of blackness or burning. When the ball has perforated flat bones, the same difference, but less in degree, is observed between the size and appearance of 16 212 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. the two openings. 2 Beck's Med. Juris., 76 ; Taylor's Med. Juris., 329. The living skin is so elastic that the entrance aperture wilJ generally have the appearance of being smaller than the ball. So, also, if the dress be composed of an elastic material, the hole made in it is smaller than that made by the ball in the integu- ments. , The appearances presented by a wound made by a rifle ball will be different from those made by one from a common musket. The former acquires a spiral motion from the spiral groove made in the barrel, and hence makes a ragged hole, much larger than itself. 2 Beck's Med. Juris., 78-9 ; Taylor's Med. Juris., 339. Some indications can be sometimes drawn from the hole made in the dress, as to the direction from which the ball was fired. If from a moderate distance, the entrance aperture is round, and the margin regularly defined ; but the exit, aperture is irregular and torn. Taylor's Med. Juris., 330. It sometimes becomes very material to determine, whether the gun was fired near the deceased, or from a distance. A case in- volving this question, occurred in Ireland, in 1834. The ques- tion, whether, in a scuffle, a pistol had accidentally gone off, and oc- casioned the death, or whether the person had deliberately fired at him from some distance. The sons of the deceased swore thatthe pistol was fired from some distance, the prisoner taking delibe- rate aim. This was confirmed by the priest, who deposed that such was the dying declaration of the deceased. But on a care- ful examination of the body, which was disinterred for that pur- pose, the surgeon was enabled to swear positively, that the pistol must have been fired close to the body of the deceased, as there distinctly appeared the marks of powder and burning on the wrist. So conclusive was this evidence deemed, that the prisoner was acquitted, and the parties who had appeared as witnesses against him, were indicted and convicted of perjury. Taylor's Med. Juris., 330. So, in another case, a soldier placed as a sentry, was found severely wounded, the calf of his leg having received a discharge from a musket, and being greatly torn. He attributed it to a wounds. 243 shot from the enemy ; but on examination, the skin of the leg was found completely blackened with charcoal, thus rendering it perfectly clear that the wound had proceeded from the discharge of his own musket, his object being to get a discharge from his regiment. Taylor's Med. Juris., 331. It is important to observe, that, under some circumstances, one ball may produce several wounds on or in the body, owing to its splitting and taking different directions. This has repeatedly occurred, where the ball has encountered an angular surface, or a projecting ridge of bones ; and sometimes, without encounter- ing an angular surface. One instance is mentioned, in which the ball, having struck the ridge of the tibia, divided itself into two parts, which, after having traversed the calf of that leg, pene- trated into that of the other ; thus inflicting no less than five wounds — three of entrance and two of exit. So, also, a ball which struck the parietal bone, divided into two portions, one of which passed out through the integuments, while the other penetrated into the substance of the brain. lb., 331 -2. There are also some singular, and indeed very extraordinary, instances on record, where the ball has been deflected from its rectilinear course, and pursued an extremely circuitous route. This is apt to occur when it strikes obliquely a curved surface, and it seems unnecessary that it should come in contact with bone, but may also take place on meeting with skin, muscles, tendons and fasciae. Thus, where two openings in the scalp were found nearly opposite each other, it was found that the ball had not penetrated the bone, but had followed the curve of the cra- nium to its place of exit. lb., 332 - 3. A ball entering at the ankle made its exit at the knee. Another entering at the back of the left shoulder, was found below the right mastoid process. A ball which had entered near the thy- roid cartilage, passed quite round the neck, and was found at the spot at which it entered. Another instance is mentioned by Dr. Hennen, where the ball struck the breast and lodged in the scrotum, the man standing erect in the ranks. Taylor's Med Juris., 333 ; 2 Beck's Med. Juris., 78. In the case of The King vs. Morgan, which occurred in 1835, 244 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. (Taylor, 333,) the question was raised, whether in case the gun bursts, the ball will take the direction which it would otherwise have taken, had it remained entire. It was held that the burst- ing of a gun is posterior to the impulsive direction given to the charge, and that therefore it will take the same direction it would have taken if the gun had not burst. It is generally a very material enquiry, to ascertain the direc- tion from which the ball has been fired. This can be easily and quite satisfactorily ascertained, if two fixed points can be found where the ball has touched without being reflected. The follow- ing case occurred, illustrating this. Several shots had been fired into a church ; some balls entered at a window, and also struck against a wall on the opposite side of the church. A line con- necting these two, and extended out, would reach a window on the opposite side of the street, from which the shots had been fired. Taylor's Med. Juris., 333. Another question which sometimes becomes important to settle, regards the position of the party shot, at the time the charge takes effect; whether he were* standing, falling, or lying down; or whether he was advancing or retiring. This depends much upon the circumstances of each case. In case of a person shot standing, the gun being pointed from the shoulder, the course of the ball will generally be transverse ; although, as we have al- ready seen, it may become deflected. A trial involving some of these questions, will be found re- ported by Dr. Gordon Smith ; also, in 2 Beck, 76 - 7, and in Taylor, 335-6. A man in company with a party of smugglers, was shot in the night. The prisoner and Ms men were pursuing them, and while so pursuing, he tripped, and in the fall, his gun went off. The smugglers also were firing on the prisoner and men in pursuit. The point to determine was, from which party the fatal shot came, as the deceased was between his own party, who were retreating and firing, and the prisoner and his party who were pursuing. If, therefore, the ball entered in front, it must have come from his own party ; if in the rear, from the prisoner. One of the witnesses examined was a navy surgeon, who found the wound in the upper part of the groin much small wounds. 245 er than that m the lower part of the buttock, the lattei being twice or three times the size of the former, and quite ragged and uneven. In the hinder opening were also found fragments of bone, but none in the cavity of the pelvis. He was therefore of opinion, that the ball had entered in front, and had come from the smugglers. Another case is reported in the English State Trials, of one Richard Annesley, who asserted that his gun had accidentally gone off in attempting to secure the deceased, who was a poach- er. The evidence of the surgeon was, that the direction of the wound was upwards, and that, in his opinion, therefore, the fowling-piece had not been levelled from the shoulder. 2 Beck's Med. Juris., 77; note. "Where the charge consists of small shot instead of a ball, a more certain evidence is furnished in regard to the distance from which it was fired. This arises from the tendency of the shot to scatter after leaving the gun barrel. When the discharge is very near, the shot strike without spreading, and make a round hole, but produce very extensive lacerations. In order to do that, however, the distance cannot be greater than ten or twelve inches from the surface of the body. When the distance ex- ceeds twelve, and ranges between twelve and eighteen, the open- ing is irregular, and borders much lacerated. When fired from a distance of thirty-six inches, the central opening becomes en- tirely lost, and the surface of the body more or less covered with shot. Thus after the distance becomes so great that the central opening is lost, the greater the spaces between the pellets of shot, the greater must have been the distance from which the gun was fired. This, it is true, will be modified by the goodness of the gun, and the strength of the charge, as well as by the distance. Taylor's Medical Jurisprudence, 336. Another question connected with gun-shot wounds which has arisen for investigation and settlement, is, whether a person firing a gun or pistol in a dark night, can be identified by means of the light produced by the discharge. Two or three cases have occurred in which this question has arisen. In the case of Rex vs. Haines, (see Taylor, 338,) same police officers were shot at by 246 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. a highwayman during a dark night. One of the officers stated that he was enabled, by the flash of the pistol, to see that the robber rode a dark brown horse of such a remarkably shaped head and shoulders, that he could identify him, and had since done so at a stable in London ; and also that the person firing it had on a dark brown great coat. In the case of the Queen vs. White, which occurred in 1839, a gentleman was wounded in the elbow by a shot fired at him. while riding home in a gig on a dark night. He observed the flash of the gun, saw it was levelled towards him, and was enabled by the light of the flash, to recog- nize the features of the accused. He was quite sure he was not mistaken in his identity. Many experiments have been made with a view to the settle ment of this question, the result of which seems to be, that on a very dark night, and away from every source of fight, a per- son who had fired the gun might be identified within a moderate distance. But if the flash were very strong, the smoke very dense, and the distance great, he could not be identified by such means. Taylor's Med. Juris., 337-8. 2. The second general question that arises is, was the wound self-inflicted, or accidental, or the act of another 1 The settle- ment of this question must depend much upon the peculiar cir- cumstances of each individual case. It may be important to at- tend 1 . To the situation in which the body is found. A body found in a room locked on the inside, the throat cut, and the instrument of death near at hand, would not only justify, but require the inference that the act was suicidal. So also it would be about equally clear, if a body were found divested of life by a similar wound, in a room accessible to others, the wea- pon of death being removed, that it was neither suicidal nor ac- cidental, but the act of another. Where there has been a secret burial, or an attempt to wash away stains of blood, or to conceal any of the evidences by which the nature of the transaction would be likely to be revealed, the inference of suicide would be negatived, and the fact of murder be rendered apparent. Any cut or thing clearly evincing design, would go far towards mak- wounds. 247 ing out a case of intenticial homicide. Where a body is found at the foot of a precipice, having upon it the marks of severe contusions, the inference of accident or suicide- is very strong Watson on Horn., 264 - 5. 2. The nature and situation of the wound or injury, may in- dicate the manner in which this question should be settled . So far as the nature of it is concerned, it may be assumed that contu- sions are seldom self-iuflicted, but they may result either from accident or homicide. They may, it is true, be produced by one's throwing himself over a precipice or out of a window, but in such cases the cause of death is very apparent. The marks of injury found upon a body, at the foot of Salisbury crags, con- sisted of a black eye, and slight cuts on the head, a large wound on the sacrum, and a severe fracture of the left ancle joint. These left little doubt, but that the death was due either to accident or suicide. It is very important to examine the situation of a con- tusion. It may be found on a part of the body which could not well have been injured by an accidental fall, as on the inner side of the arms or legs. Those very severe contusions or lacerations that must necessarily have been produced by a ponderous wea- pon, such as an axe or hammer, have, in all probability, been inflicted by another for a murderous purpose. Watson on Horn., 269-70. The anterior or lateral parts of the body, are the more gene- rally wounded in case of suicide, as they are the most easily ac- cessible. Where cutting instruments are employed, the throat and chest are the parts the most commonly selected. Where fire arms are made use of, the region of the heart, the mouth, the orbit and the temples, are the parts frequently chosen. In more general terms, the most exposed parts of the body are the most likely to become the recipients of wounds which result from ac- cident or suicide, while those which are inflicted in a concealed, or rtot easily accessible part, afford presumptive evidence of mur- der. It is a fact generally true, that all accidental wounds are to be found in exposed parts of the body. There are, however, several wounds of exposed parts that are of such a nature as al- most to preclude the idea of their being accidental ; such, for in- 248 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. stance, as deeply incised wounds of the throat, and gun-shot wounds of the mouth and temples. Taylor's Med. Juris., 251-2. It sometimes becomes necessary to determine whether the in- dividual met his death by falling on the weapon, or by having it t'mist into him. This question arose in the case of J. Scheffer, who was found dead with a wound two fingers breadth below the nipple, and between the second and third ribs. The defence was, that he had met his death by rushing on the sword of the accused. Taylor, 251 -2. To this it was answered, that this was impossible, as the wound was on the right side, and that it could not, therefore, have been inflicted unless he had run sideways. The medical faculty of Giessen, gave their opinion in favor of the defence, for the rea- son, that the deceased being at the time drunk, and in a great rage, probably assumed that kind of motion which the French call passade, by which the wound could have been inflicted in the manner it actually presented. 2 Beck's Med. Juris., 70. 3. The direction of the wound will sometimes afford an indi- cation whether it be suicidal, accidental or homicidal. In suici- cal wounds affecting the throat, the direction of the cut is the most commonly observed to be from left to right, either trans- versely or obliquely from above downwards. In suicidal stabs and punctured wounds, the direction is commonly from right to left, and from above downwards. This, however, is on the supposition that the individual was right handed, which is not al ways the fact. One good method that has been recommended is to place the -weapon in the hand of the deceased, and then, by moving the hand and arm, ascertain whether the wound could possibly have been inflicted by him or not. Oblique wounds pas? .sing from above downwards are very common both to homicide and suicide. Taylor's Med. Juris., 255. Those wounds which take an oblique course from below up wards, are more commonly the result of homicide. The inStru ment should be carefully compared with the wound. Its adapta- tion to the edges of the incision should be ascertained. Its sharpness should aho be compared with the cleanness and even- ness of the cut, and its length with the depth of the incision o WOUNDS. 219 stab. The regularity of the wound, and the cleanness and even- ness of the cut, have been considered by some as affording pre- sumptive evidence of suicide, and by others, of homicide. Some assert that an incised wound which is self inflicted, is likely to be jagged and uneven, arising from the supposed inquietude and want of resolution of the suicide. Again, others suppose that such jaggedness and unevenness will be much more likely to oc- cur in homicide, where there is undoubtedly resistance made to the attempts of the murderer. Sir Everard Home, in the case of Sellis, the servant of the Duke of Cumberland, says "I went to his apartment, found the body lying on its side on the bed, without his coat and neckcloth ; the throat cut so effectually, that he could not have survived a minute or two. The length and direction of the wound was such as left no doubt of its being given by his own hand ; any struggle would have made it irregu- lar. He had not even changed his position, his hands lay as they do in a person who has fainted ; they had no marks of vio- lence upon them, his coat hung upon a chair, out of the reach of blood from the bed ; the sleeve, from the wrist to the shoul- der, was sprinkled with blood quite dry, evidently from a wounded artery P 2 Beck's Med. Juris., 82. The direction of the wound, together with some other circum- stances, became material in a case cited by Dr. Beck from Fodere. See 2 Beck, 71 . A contest arose between a miller and a butcher. The former was killed, but the latter pretended he had no inten- tion of killing him, but had only threatened him with his knife ; that the miller renewed the attack, and in attempting to pursue him, made a false step and had fallen on the weapon. An ex- amination disclosed the fact, that there was a single external wound, which led downward to two wounds of the left ventricle of the heart, separated from each other by an interval of two lines. This showed very clearly that the accused had employed the same method to destroy his victim, as that used by butchers in Germany to kill cattle ; that is, after having driven the knife into the heart, they withdraw it some distance, and re-plunge it, so as to make a second internal wound. This peculiarity in the direction of the wound, compared with the respective statures 250 MEDICAL JURISFRUDEJSXK. of the two parties, the miller being much the larger of the two, proved that the blow had been inflicted obliquely from above downwards, and must have been so inflicted while the miller was sitting at his door, and not by a fall after getting on his feet, in which case the wound must have taken an opposite direction. Another rather remarkable instance is mentioned by Taylor, page 253. The body of a farmer was found lying on the high road, the throat severely cut, and the death having obviously been caused by the great hsemorrhage that had taken place. At some distance from the body a bloody knife was discovered, and his pockets were found to have been rifled of their contents. The wound of the throat, on being examined by a surgeon, proved conclusively from its direction, that it could not have been self- inflicted. It was not cut in the manner of suicides, by carrying the cutting instrument from before backwards. 1 The knife had been first passed in deeply under and below the ear, and then brought out by a semi-circular sweep in front, all the great ves- sels of the neck, together with the oesophagus and tracliEea,having been divided from behind forwards. It was obviously done in the same manner that the throats of sheep are cut when slaugh- tered by a butcher. This circumstance not only negatived the idea of self-murder, but served also to detect the murderer, who was subsequently tried and executed, and proved, according to the indication furnished, to have been a butcher. A very singidar case, that of Augustus Dautun, occurred in Paris in 1814. The body was found cut into four or five parts, the head having contusions on it, and there being wounds in the chest. All the different portions were carried to the Morgue, and a model in plaster taken of the bust. By means of this , plaster model the body was afterwards identified, a wart being found on the upper Up, and the bones of the thigh proving that the individual had been lame. The principal wound was in the chest, which was found to have penetrated to the heart. It was larger within than at the surface, and a second wound was discovered in the aorta two inches higher than the other. The. appearances very clearly WOUNDS. 251 justified the conclusion, that a second blow had been given with 'the dagger, before withdrawing it, merely altering its direction. The murderer was found to have been his brother Charles Dautun. The means of his identification, as related by Zerah Colburn, were very curious, and sufficiently so, to merit insertion . "In the teeth of the dead body, tightly compressed, was a piece of human flesh, apparently torn out in the dying struggle. After some time, Dautun, the brother, was gambling at the Palais Royal, and becoming angry, threw a glass at the waiter. It was shivered into pieces, and a fragment was carried into Dautun's wrist, under the cuff of his coat. The spectators wished to examine the injury, but he obstinately refused. At last, suspect- ing something mysterious, they pushed up the sleeve by force, and there beheld a scar recently healed, as if made by the tear- ing out of flesh. The landlord had been at the Morgue, and seen the plaster model. He therefore delivered him to the legal authorities, as probably the murderer." A companion in debauchery of Dautun was implicated and tried as an accomplice; and on the trial, Depuytren was ask- ed the important question, if any marks on the dead body could indicate whether the murdered person had been attacked by one or more persons. He replied, that he could say nothing except as to probabilities, but that it appeared to him that a plurality of persons had been engaged in the murder, and he assigned the following ingenious reasons : " When a man is struck, his first act is to present his hands as a defence against the blow. In this case, there was not the slightest mark of injury on them. The same person that inflicted all these wounds could not, at the same time, have held them. Again, the wounds on the head must have preceded those on the chest. These were mortal, the thorax containing four pounds of blood. While the hands were held, might not the head have been interposed to prevent the wounds in the chest." 2 Beck's Med. Juris., 88-9. " In a case mentioned by Orfila, a body was found divided into two parts by means of a cutting instrument pressed into the fibro-cartilage, uniting the third and fourth lumbar vertebrae 252 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. The articulating process of the vertebrae had been cut trans- versely through, as butchers are accustomed to cut through the spines of animals. M. Ouvrard was led to suspect that the man who had committed the murder was a butcher ; and this turned out to be the case." Guy's Principles of Forensic Medicine, 478. It is stated generally, by Watson, that if a self-destroyer effects his purpose by a cutting instrument, or incisions, he selects the throat ; that if he stabs himself, he selects the chest or belly ; and if he shoots himself, he generally does it through the head. Watson on Horn., 276. It is to be observed, that suicidal gun-shot wounds are almost always directed to a vital part, either to the brain or to the' heart. Another important thing to notice is, that they possess the character of wounds inflicted near the body, such as the blackened and burned skin, the wide and lacerated wound, the discharged pistol near the hand, often blackened by its discharge, and sometimes within its grasp. Taylor's Med. Juris., 334. An interesting case illustrating this last remark, occurred in France, in 1835. The body of the deceased was found sitting in a chair by the side of the bed, his elbow resting on the bolster, and his right hand laying over the right thigh, and grasping a pistol which appeared to have been recently discharged. The death was evidently caused by a severe gun-shot wound of the head. The son slept in the same room with the deceased, and he was accused of having murdered his parent, and then of having placed the pistol in his hand-, to give the whole the ap- pearance of suicide. There were some moral circumstances against the son ; but the fact principally relied upon, was, that when the hand, with the pistol within it, was carried to the posi- tion in which the weapon must have been held by the deceased, to have committed the fatal act himself, and the hand was after- wards allowed to fall by its own weight, the pistol each time fell from the hand to the floor. The medical witness, after some re- flection, satisfactorily accounted for the hand retaining the pistol after death, by the contractile state of the muscles continuing under the form of cadaverous spasm. The fact that knives and razors, as well as pistols, are not unfrequently found grasped in wounds. 253 in the hands of suicides, is accounted for on the same principle. It is owing to the muscular spasm persisting after death, and which is quite distinct from cadaverous rigidity. Taylor's Med. Juris. , 261. Suicidal gun-shot wounds will very seldom bt fired from be- liind, so that if the entrance is at the posterior surface of the body, the presumption is against suicide, and in favor of homi- cide. A gun-shot wound in the mouth or temples, would not generally be considered as accidental. 4. The number of the wounds is another circumstance, from which, it is said by some, an inference can be drawn in reference to their being of accidental, suicidal, or murderous infliction. It may perhaps bcasserted, as a general rule, that the suicide in- flicts but one wound, viz., that which destroys life; and with those who are determined, and inflict it with a lethal instrument, the rule is most likely to hold good. At the same time, it is per- fectly clear, that the murderer can kill by one wound. So also the suicide may inflict upon himself several wounds. The prin ciple is, that the infliction of two mortal wounds, by the suicide, is not a credible supposition ; because, by the infliction of one, his mind would be so much impaired, and his strength diminish- ed, that he would be unable to inflict another. If the first were of a nature to stun him, and thus deprive him of sensation, or if the trunk of a great artery were cut, or the heart or brain traversed, this would probably be true. .But many wounds are necessarily mortal, and yet permit many acts of volition to be afterwards done by the person upon whom they are inflicted. Taylor's Med. Juris., 257 ; 2 Beck's Med. Juris., 79-80 ; Guy's Principles of Forensic Medicine, 478. To illustrate this, the following case may be mentioned : A gentleman of Rouen was found dead in his chamber ; in the room were found two pistols, one near the body, and the other on the bed, at some distance from it. It was ascertained that the deceased had shot himself in two places. One wound had completely traversed the left side of the chest, breaking a rib before and behind, perforating the lung through its middle por- tion, and passing near to the roots of the pulmonary veins. This 254 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. was apparently inflicted while he was lying on the bed, and had caused a very large quantity of blood to become extravasated in the thorax. Notwithstanding the infliction of this mortal wound, it appeared that he must have risen from his bed, and walked to a closet to procure another pistol, with which he inflicted a sec- ond wound, that must have proved instantly mortal, the ball having entered at the frontal bone, and, after traversing the left hemisphere of the brain, had become lodged against the os occi- pitis. This was established to have been an act of deliberate suicide. Guy's Principles of Forensic Medicine, 478. It is, however, true, that the greater the number of wounds inflicted, the more are multiplied the chances of demonstrating that they must have been of homicidal infliction. A case occur- red in New -York in 1839, under the following circumstances : A woman was found dead, with many wounds upon her body. The husband, who was suspected, asserted that she had destroy- ed herself. On examination, there were found eleven stabs, eight on and about the left side of the thorax, one of which had penetrated the pericardium, and divided the trunk of the pul- monary artery at its origin, while the others were on the back, near the left scalpula. There was every reason to suppose thaf the stabs in front and at the back were inflicted at the same time ; and it was obviously quite impossible that the latter could have been self-inflicted. Taylor's Med. Juris., 257-8. When several wounds are self-inflicted, it is often only one that is mortal, and has caused the death. The multiplicity of the instruments that have been employed, causing several different wounds, may not unfrequently lead to the conclusion that the act was murderous. A' woman was found dead nearly twelve months after she was first injured. Her body was identified. A handkerchief was drawn tight round the neck, while a wound from a pistol ball was traced through the left side of the chest, passing out at the right orbit. Three other wounds were also found, all made by a sharp instrument, and one of which had entered the heart. The defence was, that the deceased had com- mitted suicide, but the great variety of the means and instru- ments employed to produce death, together with the fact that the wounds. 255 gun-shot wound in the head, the stab in the heart, and the act of strangulation, were, each one of them, sufficient to account for speedy death, left no doubt that it was an act of murder. Tay- lor's Med. Juris. , 259. It must not, however, be forgotten, that suicides, especially if laboring at the time under insanity, often inflict upon themselves many wounds., and sometimes those of a singular character. A gentleman, for instance, was found lying in a state of insensibility in his kitchen, with a cleaver by his side. Upwards of thirty wounds were found to have been inflicted over the posterior por- tion of the occipital bone. Many of these were superficial, and they all had a horizontal direction from behind, forwards. A portion of the skull, from the middle of the lambdoidal suture, had been removed by one, and from this, a part of the brain had escaped. The person afterwards recovered so far as to ad- mit that he had inflicted the wounds on himself. He died at the expiration of four days, and was a lunatic. Taylor's Med. Juris., 253. The general remark has been made, that suicides, when foiled iu a first attempt at self-destruction, continue to use the same weapon, lb., 257. This is probably generally true, but sometimes a severe in- cision in the throat has been succeeded by shooting themselves, or adopting other methods of self-destruction. 5. Some indications may possibly be gathered from the coun- tenance of the deceased. That of suicides is usually haggard, the eyes sunken, and this kind of physiognomy continues while there is any vitality remaining. The victims of assassination, on the contrary, have a greater degree of paleness and fear im- printed on the countenance. 2 Beck's Med. Juris., 75 6. Circumstantial evidence. This embraces a wiae range of enquiry, and may very well include several considerations al- ready alluded to. Very much of it may also belong to the non- professional witness. A brief allusion to a few circumstances, is ill that can here be attempted. Very few crimes of great er_ormity, and involving a resort to violence in their perpetration, can be committed without leaving 256 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. such traces in the circumstances, by which they are attended, as to lead to the detection and conviction of the perpetrator. It is rare indeed, that any amount of coolness and calculation, any degree, of ingenuity, or any power of foresight, has ever been sufficient to disentangle one from the meshes of that intermin- able web of circumstances, which is interwoven around, and into, the nature and character of every criminal act. It consti- tutes one of the great guarantees which God has given, that tht perpetrators of crime shall not go unpunished. Sometimes the slightest circumstance has led- to the detection of the criminal. In 1806, a Mr. Blight was mortally wounded by a pistol-shot. No clue seemed to be afforded as to the person who had discharged it, until Sir Astley Cooper, from an exam? nation of the localities, was enabled to say, that the shot mus t have been fired ly a left-handed man. There was only one pel son of that description near the premises, a Mr. Patch, a par- ticular friend of the deceased, and not in the least suspected. Through this disclosure, he was afterwards tried and convicted of the crime, and made a confession of his guilt. Taylor's Med. Juris., 260. The presence or absence of the weapon with which the wound was inflicted, taken in connexion with the extent and mortal character of the wound, must afford strong circumstantial evi- dence of suicide or homicide. In the case of Courvoisier, who was tried for the murder of Lord William Russel, there were two facts relied upon to show that it was not a case of suicide. One was, that a napkin was placed over the face of the deceased, and the other, that the instrument of death did, not lie near the body. Guy's Prin. ofForen. Med., 480 ; Taylor's Med. Juris., 262. The presence of a lethal instrument near the body is, by no means, a proof that the case is one of suicide. A pistol has been found near the deceased, of such a calibre that the ball which had caused the death was of too large a size to enter it. In the celebrated case of the Earl of Essex, which gave rise to much contrariety of opinion, there were several points of circumstantial eviderce, of which I shall notice only one : wounds 257 In July, 1683, he was found dead in the tower, with his throat cut, and a razor lying near him. The throat was smoothly and evenly cut from one side to the other, and entirely down to the vertebral column. Notwithstanding this the razor w r as found to be much notched on the edge. This fact those who favored the view of suicide were asked to explain. They could do so no other way than by supposing that the deceased had notched the razor by drawing it backwards and forwards on the neck bone. This he could hardly be deemed competent to Jo after all the great vessels of the neck had been divided. Taylor's Med. Juris., 262 ; 2 Beck's Med. Juris., 82 - 3, 4. The case of Jane Norkott which occurred during the reign of Charles I., afforded a striking instance of a conviction upon cir- cumstantial evidence. She was found dead in her bed with her throat cut. There were here two circumstances going to show that it was not a case of suicide as at first supposed. The one was that the bloody knife was found sticking in the floor, a good distance from the bed, but as it stuck the point was towards the bed and the haft from it. The other was that on the left hand of the deceased, was the bloody impression of a left hand. 2 Beck's Med. Juris., 86-7; Guy's Principles of Forensic Medicine, 480. It should here be remarked without dwelling upon it, that the marks of blood afford much material for circumstantial evidence. 3. The third general question proposed for discussion was — What circumstances can be gathered relative to the motive or intent of the inflictor 1 It is well known that to constitute crime, the moral element must enter, as a constituent part, into the action which it essen- tially qualifies, It is this that creates the wide difference between a mere injury, and a wrong. The first may be caused by the kick of a horse, or the blow of a maniac. The last can only pro- ceed from a rational creature, a free moral agent. The first is ximited in its effects to the mere physical nature which it injures. The last extends to, and embraces the moral nature, and is there felt as a wrong done to that nature. Hence the law always re- quires a felonious intent to be clearly shown, either directly or inferentially, before conviction can be obtained for the commis- 17 258 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. sion of a crime. Any circumstances, therefore, attending its commission, which will throw any light upon the question of intent, provided the fact of homicide be first established, should be seized hold of and eagerly appropriated. In the general ques- tions already discussed, especially the last one, many remarks, and some cases will be found bearing directly upon this question. These, it will be unnecessary to recapitulate. What then are the facts and circumstances from which the intent of the party can be gathered 1 1 . We must look at the nature, situation, direction, and extent of the wound. When found inflicted in a concealed part, such as a superficial observer would not be likely to notice, the in- ference of intent is strong. The female organs of generation have been selected as a part where a mortal wound could be in- flicted, and the greatest chance of escape from its consequences afforded. The inflictors of such wounds must have entertained the impression either that they could escape entirely from the want of observation, or that the blood, if observed and traced to the organs, would be attributed to flooding, to which females are frequently subject, or that, if the wound was actually discovered, it might be accounted for by the female's having accidentally injured herself by sitting down upon some sharp body. So con- fident have they been of success that in some cases they have been the first to go for medical aid for the deceased. Watson on Horn., 272-3. In the case of Pollock, which occurred in Edinburgh in 1826, see Watson, 104, a wound about an inch and a quarter long, was found, on separating the labia pudendi, upon the inner side of the right nympha. It was a recent clean incision, admitting the point of the finger which could be inserted in four several direc- tions, where the cellular membrane had been divided in each of these directions to the depth of two and a quarter inches. None of the large vessels had been wounded and death had obviously resulted from haemorrhage. In the case of the Duncans, also reported in Watson, 105, the wound was a clean incision, three- quarters of an inch in length, inflicted in the middle of the left labium pudendi. The greatest depth was about three inches, wounds. 259 several large blood vessels being severed. In the case of Mc- Teat, in 1830, reported by Watson, page 106, two wounds were found, one on each side of the right nympha. They were found to be clean cuts of a sharp instrument, about half an inch long, and the deepest an inch and a half in depth. They were recent, and the death had resulted from haemorrhage. These were all clearly cases in which the nature, situation and extent of the wound must clearly proclaim the intent of the party. They also go to prove that where a highly vascular part is wounded by an incision, death may take place in a very short time from the haemorrhage, although no large blood vessel be divided. The direction of the wound may also be an important circum- stance to show the intent. This question arose in the case of Campbell, who was tried in 1831, for shooting a man who came to his house at night under suspicious circumstances. See Wat- son, 24b. The defence was that the ground being rough and slippery, the prisoner stumbled, and both barrels of the gun had gone off by accident. This account of the matter was confirmed by tracing the direction of the shot in the body of the deceased, which was found to be slanting upwards. 2. We must also look at the nature of the weapon employed, and the manner in which the death was occasioned. Although every weapon, down to the fist, by the use of which death is effected, is, in the eye of the law, a " lethal weapon," yet with a view to collect the intent, it is obvious we are to have reference to the character of the weapon, and its agency in producing im- mediate death. A person must be held to intend the production of such a result, as the means employed would justify any rational being in infering must be produced by them. Hence the use of fire-arms, a sword, an axe, or any other such kind of weapon, in such a manner as evidences a design to take life, affords a very clear inference that such was the original intention. But where the fist only was used or a slight walking cane, or some other slender weapon, and the wound has proved fatal, the intent to produce such a result may well be doubted, unless it is proven from other circumstances. A repetition of the blows, however, may be evidence of the malicious intent, or it may be 260 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. established from other circumstances. A single wound, or a number of them, inflicted by repeated efforts, .would go to show the existence of malicious intent, as also would be the infliction of a wound in a cruel or atrocious manner ; as in the case of a female related by Watson, page 194, who after becoming stupified by drink and mal-treatment, had sharp pieces of stone and hay thrust into the vagina and rectum by which she died in two or three days. And also in the case of Brown, the father, who held the deceased, while his son repeatedly struck him on the head with a stick of which he died ; the father remarking " there is no wounding by rule, so as to pay well and spare the life." Watson, 239. But if the injury seemed at first to be only of a trivial nature, but afterwards, from some cause or other, proved to be fatal, the malicious intent could hardly be inferred. Watson on Homicide, 244-5. 4. The fourth general subject of enquiry is, as to the acts which indicate volition or locomotion, after the infl'ction of mor- tal wounds. It sometimes becomes important to determine what possible efforts can be made by an individual after the receipt of a mortal wound. Wherever this question has arisen, it has been generally in cases of injuries to the head, wounds of the heart, large blood vessels, diaphragm and bladder. Important infer- ences are sometimes sought to be drawn from the position in which a body is found, considered relatively with the supposed position of the murderer ; without adverting to the possibility, or perhaps, probability, of the murdered person's having changed his position after receiving the mortal wound. As the object in this enquiry is to arrive at the maximum, or utmost extent of effort, which is possible after the infliction of the severest wounds, it may be well briefly to mention a few cases which have occurred, in which this maximum seems the clearest to have been shown. A man fell from a scaffold on the summit of his head. He was at first stunned, but on reaching the hos- pital dismounted, and walked up stairs with but little assistance. He died in three days, remaining perfectly rational, and going to the water closet the day before his death. On examination af- WOUNDS. 261 terwards, the skull was found split from the frontal bone back- wards through the saggittal suture to the foramen magnum. In both hemispheres there was a large quantity of eifused blood in a semi-coagulated state, more than two ounces being found at the base of the skull. Taylor's Med. Juris., 297-8. A boy fired a pistol which burst, and the breach of it disap- peared, but it was supposed to have entered the brain. The boy remained sensible for two days, and even showed some signs of amendment, but finally died 24 days after the accident. On ex- amination the brain was found much disorganized, and the breach of the pistol weighing nine drachms was found lying on the ten- torium. Taylor, 298. This question arose in a medico-legal case reported by Dr. Wallace. A man was found dead in a stable, with a severe frac- ture of the temporal bone, which had caused the rupture of the middle meningeal artery. A companion was accused of his mur- der, but alleged that the deceased had fallen from his horse the day previous and met with the accident. It appeared that after the fall, the deceased had gone into a public house and remained there sometime drinking, afterwards returning to the stables. The question was whether it was possible, after such an exten- sive fracture with extravasation of blood, for a man to do what the accused represented the deceased to have done. The medi- cal witness denied its probability, but admitted that it was pos- sible. The excitement of the drinking might in this case have increased the quantity of blood extravasated, which was the im- mediate cause of death. Taylor, 298. Wounds of the heart have generally been considered as imme- diately fatal. This has not been found to be invariably the fact from experience. A man who had been stabbed in the right ventricle ran eighteen yards after having received the wound. He then fell and died in six hours. ' A punctured wound was found extending into the right ventricle in an obliquely trans- verse direction, dividing in its course the coronary artery. The pericardium was nearly filled with blood, and about four pounds were extravasated on the left side of the thorax. Watson, 98. In a case reported in the Medical Gazette, XIV, 344, a boy 262 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. survived five weeks, employing himself during that time in va- rious occupations, in the substance of whose heart, after his death, was found lodged a mass of wood. Taylor, 298. This question has frequently arisen where some or all the great blood vessels of the neck have been injured. In one case a wo- man who had the right carotid artery and jugular vein, together with the trachea and oesophagus completely divided, was able afterwards and before death, to escape from the house where the deed was perpetrated into a garden at some distance, where the body was found lying. Taylor, 299. In another, a man committed suicide while walking along Ox- " ford-street, by cutting his throat with a razor. Immediately af- ter inflicting the wound, he was observed to hold a handker- chief to his neck and run forwards. He ran about four yards from the spot where the wound was inflicted, and then fell dead on the pavement, the razor firmly grasped in his hand. The ca- rotid artery and several of its branches, with the jugular vein on one side, together with the trachea, had been all cut through. Taylor, mi. The particulars of a very extraordinary case are given in Tay- lor, 299-300, from which it appears that a woman, after being knocked down by a blow on the temple, and while down having her throat cut in such a horrid manner as to divide the trunk of the carotid artery, and all the principal branches of the external carotid, with the jugulars, was nevertheless able, after that, to get up, leave the hovel in which the act was done, climb over a gate outside, and find her way to a distance of twenty-three yards, where the body was found. It will readily occur to any one, that although the power of locomotion may remain after the division of the trachea, yet that all power of voice is entirely lost, and hence no calls for assist- ance can be made, at however short a distance the murder may be perpetrated. Taylor's Med. Juris., 301. In a case of rupture of the diaphragm, a man, in an intoxi cated state, who was mal-treated by anolher, returned home walking two hours and died in 15 hours afterwards. On exami- nation, a recent longitudinal rupture of the diaphragm was found wounds. 2G3 extending about two inches and an half, through which the stomach had protruded. The question was when the rupture had taken place, and whether it was possible for the man to have walked for that space of time after its occurrence. The medical witnesses thought it improbable, but, admitted the possibility of it. No other cause could be assigned than the mal-treatment. Taylor, 301. There are also many cases where locomotion, to a considera- ble extent, has been exercised after ruptures of the bladder, and extravasation of urine. In one case a man, while intoxicated, was made sober by a blow on the lower part of the abdomen. Taylor, 301. He felt cold immediately on receiving the blow, but walked home the distance of a quarter of a mile, although suffering great agony. He died four days after the accident. No ecchymosis was found on any part of the abdomen, but the bladder was rup- tured in its upper and posterior portion about an inch in length. Taylor, 301. In connection with this subject it should also be remarked, that although the infliction of a mortal wound may admit of subse- quent acts of volition and locomotion, yet that it will not admit of struggling, and violent exertion, especially if accompanied with extensive hsemorrhage. In view of this fact, a medical witness may be called upon to determine whether a mortal wound, found on the deceased, was inflicted for the purpose of murder, or in self defence. This the following case will illustrate. A woman was stabbed in the chest in an affray in Liverpool. The prisoner, the deceased, and two other females were quarrel- ling in the passage of the house. A struggle ensued between the prisoner and the deceased, which lasted about ten minutes. The defence was, that being attacked by several persons, he had stab- bed the woman in self defence. The point to determine was, when the blow was struck ; if, with premeditation, before the struggle, it would be murder ; if during the struggle, it would only amount to manslaughter. The medical evidence showed that the blow could not have been struck before the struggle, be- cause it was of a speedily mortal nature, and the deceased would 264 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. not then have been able to struggle with the prisoner for ten mi- nutes afterwards. In all medical probability, the deceased must have received the blow towards the conclusion of the quarrel, and it might, therefore, have been inflicted in self defence. The verdict was manslaughter., Taylor, 302 - 3. 5. The fifth general question regards the length of time that has elapsed since the wound was inflicted. The length of time that has occurred between the infliction of the wound and the time of the examination, is often a material subject of inquiry. In the case of The Queen vs. Raynon, tried in 1841, the prison- er was charged with maliciously cutting and wounding the prose- cutrix. There was a cut on his thumb, which he attempted to explain, by saying it was from an accident which occurred three weeks before. The medical testimony went to show that it could not have been done more than two or three days, which coincid- ed in time with the murderous assault. This, and other circum- stances, led to his conviction. Taylor, 293. An incised wound, inflicted on the living body, has its suc- cessive stages of progress to the time it becomes healed. The first is the inflammatory stages when the edges of the wound begin to swell, which usually takes place in eight or ten hours from its infliction. Redness is exhibited and heat is developed, which is followed by the secretion of lymph, this liquid being poured out for about thirty-six or forty-eight hours. It is at first semi-transparent, but afterwards becomes thicker, more tenacious, and on the second or third day, white. It afterwards is pene- trated with vessels, forms the connecting medium of the cicatrix, and becomes confounded with the tissues. The color of the cicatrix, in the first periods of its formation, is of a bright red ; it afterwards grows paler, until it becomes whiter than the color of the skin. The second is the purulent stage. Usually, on the third day the secretion acquires a purulent character. As early as the fourth and fifth day, suppuration is fully established, and it lasts some five, six, or eight days. The third stage is where cicatrization follows the purulent stage. Tins is commenced by a fibrous layer, which makes its wounds. 265 appearance between the edges, and is at first soft, and easily broken down. This is complete about the twelfth or fifteenth day, when the wound is simple, of little depth, and only affecting parts endowed with great vitality. The time occupied in these successive stages will depend con- siderably, 1. Upon the situation of the wound. Wounds of the lower extremities are longer in healing, than those on the upper part of the body. 2. On its extent. Where many different structures are in- volved, the wounds are longer in healing than when the skin and muscles are alone affected. 3. On the age and health of the wounded party. The processes, whether inflammatory, purulent, or of cicatrization, are slower the more diseased and infirm is the individual. Taylor's Med. Juris., 293 ; Watson on Horn., 19-20. The form of the cicatrix varies with the wound. In incised wounds, it is generally straight and regular. When newly form- ed, it is red, vascular, injected with blood, and tender. At sub- sequent periods, it becomes smooth, white, and less tender. Where there is a loss of substance, or if it be a lacerated or con- tused wound, the cicatrix exhibits an irregular appearance, and the healing process is accomplished by granulation. The time here required may be five, six, or eight weeks, according to cir- cumstances. The doctrine of cicatrization is important to be understood, not alone in reference to ascertaining the time that has elapsed since the infliction of a wound, but also as a means of identify- ing both the living and the recently dead. They are among those permanent marks and indications that usually remain for a series of years, or during life. In reference to this, the enquiry may be made in this connection, whether a cicatrix, once form- ed, is ever removed, or so altered, as to have its character entire- ly changed. In answer to this, it may be stated, that the tissue of which a cicatrix is formed, is different from that of the skin, being hard- er, less vascular, and destitute of the rete-mucosum, which it 2G6 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. never again acquires. It has a peculiar whiteness, more parti- cularly remarkable on the cicatrized skin of a negro. In those of lacerated and contused wounds, the form of the weapon is sometimes indicated. The true cicatrix, when so produced in the true skin, as to be easily perceptible, is looked upon as in- delible, as undergoing by time no sensible alteration in form or character. Taylor's Med. Juris. , 294. During the healing process, there is a contraction of the skin, which results in rendering the cicatrix of smaller size than the original wound. The wound itself is apparently smaller than the weapon, and the cicatrix still smaller than the wound. That formed at the exit aperture of a ball is larger and more irregu- lar than that formed at its entrance, lb., 294-5. There may be said to be still a fourth stage in the progress of wounds, viz., that of gangrene. This is the incipient stage of mortification, is attended with diminution of feeling, and livid discoloration. This never supervenes until at least fifty hours have elapsed after the infliction of the wound, unless in the case of very old persons, where it may occur earlier. It should also be remembered that putrefaction commences sooner in a wound than in any other part, but its effects must not be confounded with gangrene. Appearances on other parts of the body will be likely to afford indications by which it is easy to tell whether putrefaction has commenced or not. Taylor's Med. Juris., 295. A case occurred in which it became necessary to determine whether contusions on the body were all produced only a few hours before death, or for some time previous. The prisoner alleged that he had struck the deceased, his wife, but once, and that but a few hours before her death. The medical testimony went to show, that there were some rings of color peculiar to a disappearing ecchymosis, in some of the spots, while in others there were not, proving that the deceased had received more blows than one, and that some of these had been struck several days before her death. This was corroborated by other evidence. Taylor's Med. Juris., 295. Although the history of ecchymosis has been formerly adverted to, yet it may be well here to remark, that twenty-four or thirty- wounds. 267 six hours usually elapses before changes of color appear ; that the livid circumference gradually passes into a green circle ; this, in its turn, becoming gradually diffused into a wide straw yellow band, completely encircling the ecchymosis ; that the dark livid color slowly disappears from the circumference to the centre in four, five, or six days, while the colored bands spread more widely around ; that a central dark spot is perceptible after ten days or a fortnight, and that, in the case of a very extensive ecchymosis, some weeks usually elapse before all traces of it are lost. Taylor's Med. Juris., 295. 6. The sixth question we propose to discuss is — Was the wound the direct cause of death 1 The requirements of the law render it necessary to answer this question. In order that a person can be convicted of murder or manslaughter, it is neces- sary that the individual should die of the injury inflicted. The law can indulge in no speculation on the subject. It requires that the death should be clearly traced to the injury, and un- equivocally shown to have been caused by it. In a combat be- tween two, one receives a wound which may, or may not, prove mortal, and is left upon the field. Subsequently he is attacked by ruffians, who strip and rob him and beat out his brains. No indictment in such case would lie against the first assailant, be- cause the deceased dies by the hand of others, and not of the wound inflicted in the first combat. The following case, reported in 2 Beck, 74, will serve as an illustration. In 1808, some dro- vers had a quarrel at an inn in France. In the course of it, one of the party was wounded with a knife on the face, hand and upper part of the thorax, near the right clavicle. The injuries were found on examination to be superficial and slight. The wounded man having washed himself soon after, started for his home. He was found dead the next morning bathed in blood. The left lung and pulmonary artery were found cut. The medi- cal witnesses swore that this last was the cause of death, and that it must have been inflicted after the superficial wound upon the thorax, which was not bloody, but surrounded by ecchymosis. The fact was, that on his way home he was robbed and murdered. If a person of a weakly habit 3 receives a wound of which he 268 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. afterwards becomes cured ; but owing to the long confinement he has been made to suffer, he is taken ill of a consumption, or some other malady incident to such a state of weakness, and dies of this consumption or malady ; no charge of homicide could be sustained, as the death is directly attributable, not to the wound, but to the consumption or other malady, which might, or might not, have supervened, had no wound rendered the confinement necessary. There must also be a certainty as to tho cause of death. If the injury sustained be one only, among many causes, that have contributed to the fatal result, and the agency it has had in its production not very clearly ascertained, no conviction can be obtained. Thus in the case of William Duff and others, ( Watson, 202,) who broke into a house and so affrighted a poor woman in child-bed, that she fell into a fever and died. The indictment was held not sustainable. So also in a case somewhat similar, where the prisoner broke into a house and so alarmed a woman recently delivered, as to be injurious to her health, and cause th« death of the infant at her breast. Where, however, the death is traceable directly to the injury, and has been clearly produced by it, no matter what may have been the situation or circumstances of the deceased, the prisoner is responsible. If the deceased were on his death-bed, and in the last stage of a mortal disease, still if he were shot through the head, or stabbed with a lethal weapon, in such a manner as to produce death sooner than it would have resulted from the dis ease, it is murder equally as if he had been in the vigor of health. To avoid repetition the remainder of what might properly be- long to this question will be discussed under the next, viz : 7. What are the circumstances that modify the medico-legal character of wounds, and that vary the liability of the inflictor 1 This is a very important enquiry, as it will be found to involve an investigation into the direct causes of death, as compared, in several instances, with those which are indirect. 1. The first circumstance to be mentioned, is the interval of time which elapses between the receipt of an injury, and the death of the individual. In some countries the law fixes a definite WOCNDd. 2C9 period within which the individual must die of the injury, in order that a conviction for murder or manslaughter can be ob- tained. In Lombardy, for instance, the death must occur within a year, in England within a year and a day, in France within forty days, in Prussia within nine days. In Scotland there is no limitation, nor is there at present in the state of New- York, al- though the statute formerly prescribed six months as the requisite period. Watson on Horn., 203. In this state then, there is no obstacle in the way of connecting the death with the injury, however distant they may be separated from each other by lapse of time. In the majority of cases, wounds destroy life within two or three months after their inflic- tion, but many times the fatal catastrophe is long delayed. A case is mentioned by Sir Astley Cooper of an individual, who died from the effects of an injury to the head received about two years previously, there having been during that whole period a continuance of the symptoms of cerebral disturbance. Taylor's Med. Juris., 283. Another case is mentioned, where a man died in consequence of a rupture of the liver, which occurred eight years before. Another very extraordinary case is stated, where a ball remain- ed lodged in the left lung, during a period of twenty-five years, causing fits of suffocation and haemoptysis, under which the in- dividual at last sunk. The important point, in such protracted cases, is to connect the death with the infliction of the injury, in such a manner, as to show that the one has resulted from the other. If the wound be originally severe, or become so from its extent and long continuance, and if it keep on in a regular pro- gression from bad to worse, so that the person wounded continu- ally languishes, and is consumed by it as by a disease, the case •differs not in reason or in law from the infliction of such a wound as would have produced death upon the spot. The interval of time thus elapsing, may be important to the prisoner,-in furnishing him with greater opportunities to urge exculpatory circumstances in his favor. Thus, there may have been improper conduct on the part of the injured party, or bad medical treatment, or the accession of some other disease, either 270 medical Jurisprudence. of which, as we shall hereafter see, may form circumstances modifying the medico-legal character of wounds. 2. Jlge, as a modifying circumstance. There is a difference in the efl'ect produced by wounds on persons of different ages. The least effect is generally produced on adults and persons of middle age. A greater strength and vigor both of mind and body, enable such to withstand the shock caused by severe inju- ries better than others. They are also less affected by their sec- ondary results. The very young, and the very old, have far less vis vitee, and are therefore much more easily affected by injuries. It is to be remarked, however, that fractures of the limbs are less dangerous, and more speedily cured, in young subjects than in adults. 3. Constitutional peculiarities, as a modifying circumstance. These may be, 1. Malformation or transposition of parts. These, in relation to important parts, are not of common occurrence. The possi- bility of them, however, is clearly established. Bichat relates a case as falling under his own observation, in which the stomach, the spleen, the sigmoid flexure of the colon, the point of the heart, the aorta, and the lung with two lobes, were all on the right side. The liver, the ccecum, the base of the heart, the vena cavse, the vena asygos, and the lung with three lobes, were on the left side. All the organs placed beneath the middle line, as the mediastinum, the mesentery, the duodenum, the pancreas, the division of the trachsea, were reversed. The heart may be found on the right side of the thorax, the spleen in the place of the liver, the stomach descending into the umbilical region, and the bladder rising into the abdomen. In all such cases, where death results from an injury, and would not have so resulted had there been no transposition, unless the malicious or felonious in- tent is made out from other sources of evidence than what is derivable from the infliction of the wounds, the charge of mur- der cannot be sustained. The prisoner, so far as concerns any inferuice deducible from the act itself, of inflicting the injury, can only be held responsible for what would have been the re- sult, had the parts had their usual, natural location Under this WOUNDS. 271 view, it will devolve upon the medical witness to state what is the peculiar malformation or transposition in the given case ; wherein it differs from the usual normal state ; what precise effect is to be attributed to the injury in consequence of the deviation, and what would have been the result nad no such malformation or transposition existed. Could the prisoner be proved to have known the fact of such malformation or transposition, it would then go to prove the malicious or felonious intent. 2. There may be a preternatural thinness of the cranium, unknown to the prisoner. Several cases of this kind are on re- cord. A man caught a boy in the act of robbing an orchard, and struck him a blow on the head with a stick. This caused a fracture pf the skull, and the boy subsequently died. A mere chastisement was intended, the stick being of so small a size, as not to have caused injury, under ordinary circumstances. The fatal result was owing to a preternatural thinness of the skull. Guy, 462. A case somewhat similar occurred in Massachusetts. Taylor, 287. A blow was inflicted from a small stone, on the side of the head, of which the individual died in ten minutes. There was no fracture of the bones, or external bruise visible. The skull was found unusually thin, and the ventricles filled with coagulated blood, and all the vessels in a congested state. The same principle prevails here in regard to liability, as that just mentioned. 3. There may be a preternatural phlogistic, or hsemorrhagic diathesis. There are many cases of this kind upon record. The slightest wound, or abrasion of the skin, will cause alarming dis- charges. Even the scratch of the thumb nail, in the case men- tioned by Metzger, produced death. 2 Beck's Med. Juris., 185. Many authorities are cited by Dr. Beck, (see notes, 2 Beck, 185,) which go to show, not only that this diathesis is liable to be he- reditary, but that it is generally found to prevail in the male, and not in the female, line. The same principle must also prevail here in reference to liability in case of wounds or injuries, as that already mentioned. 4. Previous injury, or disease, as a modifying circumstance 272 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. Under this head, many cases may present themselves involving no small amount of difficulty to the medical witness. It is really one of the most important topics that comes up for discussion in the whole range of Medical Jurisprudence. A person while la- boring under the effects of an injury, or of some chronic disease, may be killed by a very slight blow, or even a sudden fit of pas- sion. The question then arises, as to the cause of death. Was it the disease or the blow 1 And would the blow have been suffi- cient without the disease 1 And did the blow accelerate the fatal result, which would otherwise have been unavoidable 1 " The law, as laid down by Lord Hale, is, that " it is sufficient to prove that the death of the party was accelerated by the ma licious act of the prisoner, although the former labored under a mortal disease at the time of the accident." The following principle, laid down by Starkie, will meet the case, where a knowledge of the peculiar state and condition of the deceased existed on the part of the prisoner : " It seems that in general, notwithstanding any facts which tend to excuse or alleviate the act of the prisoner, if it be proved that he was ac- tuated by prepense and deliberate malice, and that the particu- lar a icasion and circumstances upon which he relies, were sought ' for, and taken advantage of, merely with a view to qualify ac- tual malice, in pursuance of a preconceived scheme of destruc- tion, the offence will amount to murder." Several interesting cases will be found in the works upon Medical Jurisprudence, illustrative of this point. A gentleman was tried for the murder of his servant, killed by a blow on the loins. It was shown that the kidney of the deceased contained a calculus, the ragged points of which, by puncturing the blood vessels, had occasioned a fatal haemorrhage. An acquittal fol- lowed upon the capital charge. Guy, 463. The wife of a play-actor stabbed her husband in New-Orleans, in 1842, during a quarrel at the theatre. He died in about ten minutes, as it was supposed, from the effect of the wounds, one of which was on the right arm, and the other in the region of the stomach. The medical evidence showed that there was a con- siderable quantity of effused blood in the stomach, which was found wounds. 273 to proceed from the rupture of a large aneurism of the abdomi- nal aorta, the parieties of which were so much thinned, that the least excitement was sufficient to cause the accident. The prison- er was acquitted. Guy, 468. A husband, on returning home one night, found his wife in a gin-shop, where she had been drinking and dancing. He struck her twice, and carried her home on his shoulders. A short time after, the husband described her as taking a fit, on account of which, he laid her in bed, and some of the neighbors coming in, found her to be dead. Sir Charles Bell found on the head, marks of several bruises. The skull was uninjured, but an extravasa- tion of blood was found at the base of the brain, and into the ventricle. The anterior artery of the cerebrum was half torn across, and from this the extravasation had taken place. Were the blows the cause of this rupture 1 Mr. Bell thought that such a shock was very likely to have caused it, because a slighter injury would probably have produced it in consequence »f her state of intoxication, and the struggle she had with her husband, than would have been required in other circumstan- ces. Watson, 214. Cases of this kind, presenting peculiar difficulty, are those in which the symptoms and effects both of the previous disease, "and of the injury, are similar, so that it is difficult or impossible to say which proved fatal. This class of cases may arise when injuries have been inflicted on the head or chest, where there already exists chronic disease of the brain and lungs. In such cases, enquire, 1. Was the injury sufficient to cause serious mischief in a healthy person, under ordinary circumstances 1 The answer to this, question must depend upon an extensive knowledge of physiological principles ; of the laws of life, and of the conse- quences of their invasion. These we shall not discuss here. There are cases, however, which have arisen under this inquiry, in which no doubt could be entertained. A slight injury, for instance, causes death by the rupture of an aneurism, or other- wise diseased blood vessel, or by that of a hernia, or diseased bowel. 16 274 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. Two men, having been at enmity with each other, accidental 1 ly met in the street, when one of them, while passing on horse- back, struck the other across the shoulders with a whip. The man struck, immediately pursued the other, in a strong passion, but had hardly advanced a dozen steps, when he fell, uttered a few indistinct syllables, and died instantly. On examination, no outward mark of injury could be seen. It was subsequently found that an aneurism of the aorta had burst within the chest. Watson, 215. In 1744, Lydia Alien Was tried for the murder of her hus- band, by having kicked him in the groin. He had an inguinal rupture, and the injury proved fatal. Watson, 216. Whether injuries inflicted on persons laboring, at the time, under serious disease, might, or might not, cause death in a healthy person, is often a very nice and difficult question. Where the injury was of such a character as to have proved fatal in a healthy person, not, at the time, afflicted with any weakness or disease, the existence of a previous ailment would not mitigate the nature, of the crime. Watson, 216-17. 2. Did the injury, or the previous disease, occasion the death 1 Tins is frequently a very difficult question, more especially when the injury and the disease each produce the same symptoms and appearances. The occurrence of a violent passion, or a state of intoxication, may develope a previously latent disease, so as to cause apoplexy with extravasation ; and at the time of such de- velopment, an injury may be inflicted on the head. Some cases illustrating this may be cited under the next enquiry. In such cases, it may be impossible to say which was the cause of the death. The disease and the injury may also act upon each other sympathetically. 3. Did the alleged previous disease really pre-exist, or was it the consequence of the injury 1 The greatest difficulty is likely to arise here where the injury and the disease affect the same or- gan, as the brain, lungs or alimentary canal. Fatal inflamma- tory action may have been going on for a considerable time un- observed previous to the injury, and when the effects of it be- come suddenly developed, simultaneously with the infliction of wounds. 275 the injury, there is often much difficulty in deciding to which of the two the result is attributable. The following case, reported in, Watson, 218-19, will serve to illustrate. David Kennoway was tried for parricide in 1825. The sister, on Sunday evening, left him at home in a state of intoxication, quarrelling and struggling with his father, an old man of seventy. Shortly after the prisoner followed her down stairs and went away. She immediately returned, having been absent about seven mi- nutes, and found her father stretched dead upon the floor, with a slight wound upon the nose, and a severer one upon the fore- head. She had left him apparently in good health. On opening the body there was found half a pint of red serosity in the ven- tricles of the brain, but no fracture of the skull, no extravasa- tion of blood beneath it, no laceration of the brain. There was also an effusion of reddish serum in each pleural sac, but no other morbid appearances, in the chest or elsewhere. The countenance was very black, which was incompatible with the supposition that the blows produced the result by caus- ing a violent concussion of the brain ; as in cases of death from concussion the countenance is pale. After determining that it could not be the result of concussion, perhaps the next question that would present itself would be, whether the effusion was a vital one, or one of those pseudo-morbid appearances, which occur after death, and are apt to simulate the results of disease. The change was undoubtedly a vital one, no instance being known in which the vessels poured out so large a quantity of serum af- ter death. The next question that arises is, was it the result of the injury and the struggle, or was it previously in existence, without producing any symptoms of disordered health ? It could not well have been the result of the injury and struggle, because if so, it would have been blood and not serum. The serum must be regarded as a sort of secretion or separation from the blood, and could not therefore be the sudden production of an injury. In connection with this, should also be taken into con- sideration the fact, that there was the same sort of bloody serum effused into the cavities of the pleura, which would seem to ne 276 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. gative the conclusion that the effusion in the brain was the result of violence. It is rendered pretty clear from all the facts and reasonings upon this subject, that the serum was effused previously to the injury. The difficulty then is to account for its existence unac- companied by any symptom of disease. Mr. Watson supposes that the man had a latent hydrocephalic effusion, which proved suddenly fatal by the shock of thp blow, or his, struggles, or his violent passion. He cites some cases to prove this. Watson on Horn., 219. One was that of a young woman, who had complained, for four days, of some headache and occasional vomiting, but was able to go about. She was suddenly seized with ratling in the throat, and died unexpectedly in the full possession of her senses. On examination of the body, there was found in the ventricles of the brain, three ounces of serosity and a watery vesicle. Another case is mentioned by Dr. Abercrombie, very similar to that of Kennoway, except that the effusion was external tp the brain. Morgagni has also mentioned a case of fatal pneumonia, where no less than eight ounces of serosity were found in the ventricles of the brain after death, without any corresponding symptoms during life, which must have been a case of true la- tent hydrocephalus. < " In the case of Kennoway, the surgeons attempted to get rid of all these difficulties by ascribing the effusion to the blows, and death to the effusion. But this is manifestly at variance with sound pathology. Kennoway was convicted of culpable homi- cide, and transported for life." Several other cases are mentioned by Watson and others, but the one above stated presents. features fully as important as any other under this head, and may, therefore, serve as its illus- tration. 5. Of subsequent injury or disease, as a modifying circum- stance. This presents a class of cases, involving almost as much difficulty, as the immediately preceding. We have already seen, that the deceased must die of the injury inflicted, in ordgr to sustain an indictment against the inflictor. This involves tht wounds. 277 necessity of being able to trace the cause of death clearly to the injury. Sometimes a subsequent injury may be received to which the death is properly attributable. One Williams, of Glasgow, in 1833, received an injury which brought on a fever. He then received some severe blows, which caused gangrene of the fin- gers and arm, fever, delirium and death. Watson, 223. The most difficult cases, however, are those in which the wounds become modified by the supervention of diseases which occur in their progress. These are the most commonly fever, erysipelas, inflammation, gangrene, haemorrhage or tetanus. The intervention of any one of these, after the receipt of a se- vere wound, must render the case more or less doubtful and dan- gerous. If traced clearly to the wound as their cause, the ae cused will be held responsible, as they must then be regarded as the consequences of his own wrongful act. Janet McLar en received an injury upon the head in July, 1823. The scalp was wounded, and the skull fractured and depressed, but there were no symptoms of any brain affection. An inflam- matory fever supervened ; and, several weeks after the injury of the head, violent inflammation of the chest came on and she died in two days after. Watson, 223. There were found three pounds of serous effusion mixed with flakes of lymph in the chest. The iight lung adhered to the walls of the chest, and formed an ab- scess. There was also purulent matter in the substance of the lung. It was thought that the diseased states of the head and chest were each sufficient to have caused death, but that the lat- ter appeared to be the immediate cause of it ; the inflammation of the former being transferred to it. As both were traceable in a very direct manner to the injury, there was no doubt but that the wound was the cause of death. The most difficult cases are those in which fever, erysipelas, and tetanus, supervene upon the reception of a wound. It is not easy to distinguish between fever which occurs as a consequence of the injury, and that which arises from other causes. But in case of an injury of the head, and the subsequent' occurrence of fever, if lymph or pus is found effused on the membranes of the brain, the fever has most probably been the consequence of the 278 MEDICAL JURISPB.UDEtvXE". injury, as this is frequently found in fever so caused. ' So also wheu erysipelas is caused by a wound, it generally begins around the wound itself. Reference should also be had to the prevalence or non-prevalence of these diseases at the time. Watson, 224. " Fever with coma in a case of injury of the head, inflamma- tion of the lungs with a wound of the chest, spontaneous rupture uf an intestine where a blow had been inflicted, are cases which may be attended with much difficulty." Watson, 224. An extremely difficult case for a decision is, where a slight wound is followed by tetanus. This disease is the most likely to supervene as a secondary consequence of lacerated or contused wounds which affect nervous or tendinous structures. It gives no warning of its approach, and may succeed very slight wounds. It may occur spontaneously, and may come on in consequence ol exposure to cold and wet. When it is the result of a wound, it generally appears after about the third or fourth day. Taylor, 289. Several cases have occurred and are reported, illustrating the supervention of tetanus. One is the case of Mackenzie, tried for the murder of Clark, in 1827, Watson, 208-9, in which a small, ragged, lacerated wound was inflicted upon the nose, and also some contused wounds upon the right elbow, and left hip joints. The injury took place on the 8th of January. Although some- what unwell, he was enabled to be about his business some days. He died on the 19th. The report of the medical witnesses was, " that Clark's death had been occasioned by tetanus, which had supervened upon the injuries he had received on the 8th of Janua- ry ; and that, though this was an occasional, yet it was not a common or necessary consequence of wounds." The prisoner was found guilty of assault, but absolved from the charge of murder. The case of Capt. Moir, tried in 1830, reported in Taylor, 290, was also an important one. The deceased had been a poacher upon the premises of the prisoner. He had furnished great pro- vocation; and, on this occasion, the prisoner had rode back to his house, which he had left shortly before, and, having pro- cured his pistols, fired at the deceased, and wounded him severe- wounds. 279 ly in the arm. The muscles, vessels and nerves were extensive- ly lacerated. The deceased lingered for some time ; tetanus su- pervened, under which he died. The medical evidence adduced on the trial, showed that death was caused by tetanus, brought on by the gun-shot wound inflicted by the prisoner. The priso- ner was found guilty and executed. The connexion in this case was clearly traced between the disease and the injury inflicted. In all such cases, very important inferences may be drawn from the nature and character of the wound, and also from the instru- ment with which it is inflicted. A slight wound, inflicted with a trivial instrument, would go far to negative all malicious or felo- nious intent ; whereas a severe wound, produced by a lethal weapon, or under circumstances implying malice, would go equally far to establish that intent which forms the gist of the crime. 6. The sixth and last modifying circumstance I shall mention, is misgovernment on the part of a wounded person, or his medi- cal attendant — Malum Kegimen. The difficulty here frequently consists in the inability to state how much of the fatal event is to be ascribed to the injury, and how much to the individual's own want of care, or to the inattention or improper treatment of the physician. Mr. Watson properly considers this subject under three heads, the first of which is, 1. Was the want of assistance or attendance accidental, and inevitable, or was it intentional 1 In the former case, the prisoner is responsible ; in the latter not. The question involved in that first mentioned, arose in the case of the Queen vs. T/wmas and others, tried in 1841. Guy, 373. The deceased died from the effects of severe injury to the head, no medical assistance having been called. The judge said it was possible, that if he had had medical advice he might not have died ; but whoever did a wrongful act must take the whole consequences of it. That it never could make any difference, whether the party injured had, or had not, the means, or the mind, to apply for medical advice. The prisoners were convicted. "If, however, the neglect to call assistance is intentional ; if it 28( MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. proceed from carelessness ; or if a quack is employed, when a regular practitioner might have been had, and the person dies, the prisoner could not he considered responsible for the whole damage. This would form a valid plea of exculpation, or, at least, of mitigation of punishment." 2. Irregularities, or misgovernment, on the part of the patient. These may be of various kinds : 1 . He may refuse to undergo the treatment prescribed : 2. He may be intemperate ; may expose himself to cold or heat ; or give himself up to the indulgence of inordinate passions. 2 Beck, 195. Of all these, intemperance is perhaps the most common. In the case of Turner, reported in Watson, 228 - 9, a severe blow was inflicted towards the back of the right side of the chest, and several cuts on the head, by an earthen-ware dish, which fell from the top of a screen, and broke into fragments. He was seized, on the next evening, with great shivering, complaining of pain in his side and breast. He refused to apply to a phy- sician, and continued to drink whiskey. He died on the 18th, three days after the injury. Externally, there were no marks of severe injury. Internally, serous effusion was found between the membranes of the brain, such as often exists in drunkards ; about four ounces of sero-sanguineous fluid effused into the right side of the chest ; the lungs adhering to the parieties at the lateral and middle part of the right side, by firm old membranous ad- hesions ; the lobes on the right side adhering to each other by old appearing membranous adhesions ; the lower and middle lobes much condensed, hepatised and fleshy ; the color red, and air cells obliterated ; the liver enlarged, hardened, uniform ; the kidneys enlarged, the right one encysted. The injury on the right side of the chest appeared to be connected with the inflam- mation of the lungs which proved fatal. In another case, originally reported by Dr. Christison, see Watson, 231, one prostitute, in a drunken revel, struck another with a smoothing-iron, inflicting a denuding wound of the skull. The wound never healed, and the woman constantly complained of headache. . Eight weeks after the accident, she was attacked WOUNDS. 281 with erysipelas of the head and face, which ended fatally in ten days. An indolent ulcer occupied the seat of the wound, from the bottom of which, a small hole proceeded inwards, and per- forated the bone. The woman, after the injury, kept up her old habit of getting intoxicated, even dancing with great spirit, and getting dead drunk at a ball, only a few days before the erysipelas began. She continued to lead the very kind of life which was calculated to induce serious consequences. The medical wit- nesses testified, that the death could not with any certainty be ascribed to the wound. The prisoner was convicted merely of an assault. In addition to the irregularities or misgovernment referred to, it should also be mentioned, that the patient may conceal from the medical attendant some fact or circumstance, the knowledge of which may be important in the treatment of the case. Thus in the case put by Watson, 232. A medical attendant is called in a case where erysipelas has supervened in consequence of a wound of the scalp. The fact of the wound is concealed, and the case is treated as a spontaneous erysipelas. The person dies, perhaps from the neglect of having that method of treatment pursued, that would have been, had the physician known the fact of the injury. 3. There may be misgovernment on the part of the medical attendant, which may arise from ignorance, inattention, or mis- management. This would form no exculpation if the wound was necessarily mortal, but it might, if it were simply dangerous. This ignorance, inattention, and mismanagement, may be mani- fested in a variety of ways, not necessary to be mentioned. One case will serve to illustrate this. J. Bell was tried for the murder of John Kerr. He struck him a severe blow on the forehead, with a hoe, on the 20th of July. His death took place on the 28th. On the day after the injury, Kerr did not seem very ill, and was able to walk to his bed, having been admitted into the Royal Infirmary. On post-mortem examination, there was found, about an inch above the right orbit, and close to the mesial line, a circular, compound, com- minuted, and depressed fracture of the middle part of the frontal 282 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. bone, presenting the appearance of a shallow cup, of about half an inch in depth. The pericranium was in a sloughy state. The wound had suppurated. Internally there was purulent matter between the broken cranium and dura mater. Some spiculss of bone were found attached to the dura mater ; several of which had penetrated through it into the brain. There was also some purulent matter and lymph below the dura mater ; and softening, with abscess, in the substance of the' brain, about an inch deep at the seat of the injury. The medullary substance of the" brain was inflamed, and had a yellow appearance to the extent of about an inch and a half around the abscess. The de- pressed portions of bone had not been removed. The death obviously occurred from inflammation of the brain, and the in- flammation itself, was caused by the irritating action of the de- pressed portions of bone on the membranes and substance of the brain. Those portions should have been elevated and removed. This should have been done prior to any symptoms of inflamma- tion or effusion having been developed. Watscm, 236 - 7. Lord Hale attempts to distinguish between death as it results from a wound rendered mortal by improper treatment, and death as it results from the improper treatment, irrespective of the wound. He thus lays down the rule. " It is sufficient to con- stitute murder, that the party dies of the wound given by the prisoner, although the wound was not originally mortal, but be- came so in consequence of negligence or unskilful treatment ; but it is otherwise, where death arises not from the wound, but from unskilful applications or operations used for the purpose of curing it. Guy, 472. In the case of surgical operations, the principles that should govern are ably set forth by Mr. Taylor. Taylor, 290-91. " Should an operation be unnecessarily and unskilfully performed, the responsibility of an agressor would, of course, cease, if the death of a wounded party could be clearly ascribed to it. Thus, if in carelessly bleeding a wounded person, the brachial artery should be laid open, or if in performing amputation, a large artery be imperfectly secured, so that the patient, in either case, die from hemorrhage, the prisoner is not responsible, because it wounds. 283 would be punishing him for an event depending on the unskil- fulness of the medical practitioner. But if the bleeding or am- putation is performed with all proper care and skill, and yet, in the one case, phlebitis, and in the other, tetanus, gangrene, or fever should destroy life, the prisoner will be differently situated. The practice of the law is strictly consistent with justice. If the operation be absolutely required for the treatment of a wound, if it be performed with ordinary skill, and still death ensue as a direct or indirect consequence, the prisoner will be held respon- sible for the result. It is presumed in these cases, that if the patient were left to himself, he would, in all probability, die from the effects of the wound. If, therefore, a surgeon, knowing that an operation would give a chance of saving life on such an occa- sion, did not perform it, it might be successfully contended in the defence, that the deceased had died, not from the wounds, but from the incompetency and neglect of his medical attendant ; thence it follows, that if during this very necessary treatment, unforeseen, though not unusual causes, cut short life, no excul- pation should be admissable, if it went to attack the best directed efforts made for the preservation of life." 8. What are the questions that arise in case of mayhem or maiming 1 Mayhem -was always an offence at common law. It was there denned to be a bodily hurt, whereby a man is rendered less able in fighting to defend himself or annoy his adversary. Therefore the cutting off, or disabling, or weakening a man's hand or finger, or striking out his eye, or fore-tcoth, or depriving him of those parts, the loss of which in all animals abates their courage, are held to be mayhems. But the cutting off an ear, nose, or the like, would not, at common law, be mayhem, because the effect would be simply to disfigure, not to weaken. To render the act indictable it must be done maliciously. United States' Criminal Law, 509. New-York, and most, of the other states, have statute enact- ments upon this subject. In New- York it is enacted, that " every person, who, from premeditated design, evinced by lying in wait 284 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. for the purpose, or in any other manner, or with intention to kill or commit felony ; shall, 1 . Cut out or disable the tongue ; or, 2. Put out an eye ; or, 3. Slit the lip, or slit or destroy the nose ; or, 4. Cut off or disable any limb, or member of another, on pur- pose; upon conviction thereof, shall be imprisoned in a state prison, for such term as the court shall prescribe, not less than seven years. 2 R. S., 664, § 27. The statutes of other states make some difference both in de- fining the offence, and prescribing the punishment. Connecticut punishes the putting out of the eye or eyes of a person, so as to cause blindness, with imprisonment in the state prison for life ; Delaware and North Carolina, the cutting oft" the genitals, with death. 9. How should the medico legal examination of wounds be conducted 1 A few practical suggestions are all that can here be offered under this head of enquiry. It is important, if possible, to ex- amine a wound that presents externally, before the body has been removed from the position in which it was first found. The relations sustained by the body, and the wounds, With things external to them, can then, and then only, be properly ascertained. After examining with reference to these relations, the next thing to be remarked is the kind of wound inflicted. Is it a contused wound or a lacerated, gun-shot, incised, or punctured wound 1 If either, what was the probable instrument by which it was inflicted 1 Is the form and impress of the instrument de- fined by the contusion, as is occasionally the fact 1 Can any- thing be collected from the lacerated, incised, or punctured wound, in reference to the instrument of its infliction 1 If it be a sword or gun-shot wound, are the entrance and exit holes clear- ly ascertainable 1 The existence of all foreign bodies should be carefully noted, and they should be preserved. The depth of the ball may serve to indicate the distance from which it was fired. The wadding has identified the murderer. In one case, wounds. 285 half a ballad was found in it, and the other half in the pocket of the accused. The bullets should be preserved, to compare with fire-arms in the possession of the accused. If the wound be incised or punctured, the quantity of hsemor- rhage should be ascertained, with the view of determining wheth- er it was inflicted during life. The bloodless state of the vessels is best ascertained by a reference to the organs of the abdomen, and also to the state of the brain. Watson, 381. It should be observed whether there is a clot of blood over the cut surface, and also whether any signs of living action are ob- servable. Any appearance of inflammation, of suppuration, or of gangrene, would be evidence of infliction during life. The length, breadth and depth of the wound, should be carefully as- certained. The external, or other parts of the wound, should not be destroyed. As far as possible, they should be kept entire. The custom observed in Paris is very admirable, and worthy of imitation ; that is, to make a cast in plaster, of all wounds in cases where bodies are found divested of life by wounding, and preserve them in one particular place, called the Morgue, where they may ever afterwards be seen, and, if necessary, appealed to, for the purpose of discovering the murderer. The external wound should be carefully compared with the internal injury, whether it be of blood vessels, nerves, bone, or viscera. Fractures require a careful examination, to determine whether they were produced before or after death. The seat of wounds should be described by actual measurement from known points ; their figure and nature also carefully noted, and their direction ascertained with exactness. The latter may serve to show from what point the wound has been dealt. The most approved mode of examining injuries is, if they be not situated over great cavities, to expose the successive layers of muscles in the manner of an ordinary dissection, observing carefujly what injuries have been sustained by the parts succes- sively exposed, before they are divided. Watson, 379. All the great cavities should be examined, and every impor- tant organ in each, however distinctly the cause of death may seem to be indicated in one of them, lb., 375. 286 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. After examining the position of the body, things external to it should be noted ; all the objects in its vicinity, with a view to discover on what it rested, or fell upon, or had been suspended from ; all the marks of a struggle taking place near it ; signs ot the presence of a second party about the time of death, or after it ; weapons or other objects, the property of the deceased, or of some other individual; all the remains of poisons, marks of vomiting, &c, that may be found near. To a shrewd and cau- tious observer, many indications of a character similar to the preceding, will present themselves. III. POISONS. This very extensive division of the second class, will be found to possess an importance second to none we have yet con- sidered. That importance is increased, rather than diminished, by the fact, that it may be secretly administered, in the solitude and retiracy of the sick room, or amid the thousand occasions that are offered in the transactions of social and domestic life ; and that its successful discovery, and complete disclosure, is at- tended with more or less of doubt and difficulty. Before bring- ing to view the several individual poisons, the effects of which are the most frequently made the subjects of investigation in courts of law, it will be proper and necessary to present some general considerations, which will be done in the following order 1 . The definition : What is a poison ? 2. The law, and legal enactments in reference to its adminis- tration : 3. The art of secret poisoning, or of preparing poisons in such a manner that, in their effects, their poisonous quality shall be concealed : 4. The various methods by which poisons may become intro- duced into the system : 5. Their mode of action, when once introduced : 6. The various causes, or circumstances, which modifv theii action, with some hints relative to their treatment poisons. 287 7. The general sources of evidence of the administration of poisons : 8. The most approved methods of medico-legal examination in case of poisoning : 9. The arrangement and classification of poison : 10. The consideration of the different classes, their orders or groups, and the substances composing them, or the individual poisons. 1. The definition : What is a poison 1 The great number and variety of substances that come under the denomination of poisons, taken in connexion with the wide diversity that characterizes their action upon the human system, creates a difficulty in fixing upon any definition comprehensive enough to include the whole, and yet sufficiently distinctive to have an application to them, and to nothing else. There are sub- stances which act mechanically, such as pins, needles, pounded glass, but which are not poisons. So, also, the same substance may, from some peculiarity of constitution, injuriously affect one person and not another. Such is not a poison. A large draught of «old water, taken into the stomach of a person heated by vio- lent exercise, may prove suddenly destructive to fife, but cannot be considered as a poison. So, also, hot water, taken into the system, may prove destructive, but is not poisonous. In view of all this, the definition given by Dr. Guy, 520, seems the most unexceptionable, viz., that " a poison is any substance which, when applied to the body externally, or in any way introduced into the system, wit/tout acting mec/ianically, but by its own inherent quali- ties, is capable of destroying life." 2. The law, and legal enactments, in reference to its adminis- tration. -If one resorts to poison, as an instrument to accom- plish the destruction of fife, it is equally murder, as if he had employed any other agency to effect the same purpose. Even where the person intended to be destroyed, does not take it, but one not intended does, and death is the result, the crime of mur- der is legally consummated, and morally too, as the intention was to destroy life. This principle was established in Saunders' case. See Plmoden 1 * 288 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. Reports., 473. Saunders, intending to kill his wife, gave her a poisoned apple, which she, in ignorance of its true character, gave to his child, against whom he never meant any harm. The child died, and Saunders was convicted of murder. The perpe- tration of murder by means of poison was in England, anciently, punished more severely than the accomplishment of death by any other means. One was sentenced to be boiled to death. At one time, the offence was adjudged high treason. But subser quently, these distinctions in punishment were done away. But the law not only punishes the use of poison which is suc- cessful in destroying life, but also, the employment of it with the intent to destroy it, although the attempt may fai-i. The English statute (1 Vict, c, 85,) enacts, "that whosoever shall administer to, or cause to be taken by, any person, any poison o.r other destructive thing, with intent to commit murder, shall b», guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof, shall suffer death:" Guy, 519. The Revised Statutes of New- York enact, that " if any person shall be convicted of having administered, or of having caused and procured to be administered, any poison to any other human being, and which shall have been actually taken by such human being, whereof death shall not ensue, he shall be punished by imprisonment in a state prison for a term not less than ten years." 2 R. S., 665. So, also, it is made an offence to mingle poison with any food, drink, or medicine, with intent to kill or injure any human be- ing; and wilfully to poison any spring, well, or reservoir of water ; and to administer or expose any poisonous substance, so that it shall be taken by any horse, cattle, or sheep. 2 R. S., 666, 689. " If any physician, while in a state of intoxication, shall, with- out a design to effect death, administer any poison, drug or medi- cine, or do any other act to another person, which shall produce the death of such other, he shall be deemed guilty of man- slaughter." 2 R. S., 662. If, under the same, or similar circumstances, a physician, or poisons. 289 any other person, prescribes either of the above, and life is en- dangered, it is declared a misdemeanor. In nearly or quite all the states, wilful attempts to destroy life by poison, although unsuccessful, are ranked among the higher crimes. 3. The art of secret poisoning, or of preparing poisons in such a manner, that, in their efliects, their poisonous quality shall be concealed. The history of this singular art will be found in 1 Beekman's History of Inventions, 74, et seq. Although it has once occupied a conspicuous place in history and Medical Jurisprudence, yet the investigation of it, at the present day, belongs rather to the curious than the useful. Under the term secret poisons, were understood to be included all those which can be administered imperceptibly, and which gradually terminate life like a linger- ing disease. The art of preparing and administering these poi- sons was known to the Greeks and Romans, particularly to the latter. It was much practiced in Rome, about 200 years B C. About 150 ladies of the first families were convicted and punish ■ ed for preparing and distributing poison. The art, however, was preserved ; arid we subsequently find the infamous Locusta, condemned to suffer death, but pardoned in order that she might be employed for state purposes. She afterwards prepared the poison with which Nero dispatched Britanicus, the son of Ag- rippina. The poisonous substances were derived from plants, particularly aconite, hemlock and poppy ; or extracted from ani- mals. The ancients seem not to have been acquainted with mi- neral poisons. This dangerous art appears to have been carried to the greatest height in Italy, in the 17th century. The most infamous prac- ticer of it was the celebrated Toffania, who first resided at Paler- mo. She prepared the Aqua Tophania, which she distributed by way of charity, to such wives as wished to have other husbands. From four to six grains were sufficient to destroy a man, and it was asserted that the dose could be so proportioned, as to operate in a cei'tain time, such a number of days, weeks or months, for instance, after it was administered. This, without a knowledge 19 290 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. of the constitution, and manner of living of her victims, would clearly have been impossible. She distributed her poison in small glass vials, labelled Manna of St. Nicholas of Bari, and or- namented with the image of the Saint. She was at length seized and thrown into prison, where she acknowledged that she had caused the death of over 600 persons. She was afterwards strangled, and her body thrown, at night, into the area of the convent, from which she had been taken. This was to mitigate the arch bishop for invading the right of sanctuary. This singular preparation was colorless, transparent and taste- less like water. Its poisonous quality was ascribed to arsenic, and it was said to be a solution of arsenic in aqua cymbalaria, the dose being from four to six grains. The symptoms as given by Hahnemann, see Christison, 296, were "a gradual sinking of the powers of life, without any violent symptom — a nameless feeling of illness, failure of the strength, slight feverishness, want of sleep, lividity of the countenance, and an aversion to food and drink, and all the other enjoyments of life. Dropsy closes the scene, along with black, miliary eruptions and convulsions, or colliquative perspiration and purging." In 1659, it was observed at Eome, that many young married women were left widows, and that many husbands died when they became disagreeable to their wives. It was at length dis- covered that the mischief proceeded from a society of young married women, whose president, a little old woman, pretended to foretell future events, and who had often predicted, very exactly, many deaths to persons who had cause to wish for them. The old lady's name was Hieronyma Spara. She was a Sicilian, and had acquired the art from Tofifania, at Palermo. She, her assistant and three other women were hung. This detestable art also excited great attention in France, about the year 1670. The principal agent of destruction, through its practice, was the Marchioness de Brinvillier, a young and beau- tiful female, whose outward attractions concealed a heart of most uncommon atrocity. She became the intimate of one Godin de Sainte Croix, who, poisons. 291 while confined in the Bastile, learned of one Exili, an Italian, the art of preparing secret poison. This art, after his liberation, he communicated to the marchioness ; who, assuming the garb of a nun, distributed food to the poor, and nursed and gave medicines to the sick in the Hotel Dieu, for the sole purpose of trying the strength of her different poisons. She was so success- ful that it was said, in Paris, that no young physician, in intro- ducing himself to practice, had ever so speedily filled a church yard as Brinvillier. She caused her father and brother to be poi- soned, and endeavored in the same way, but without success, to destroy her sister. Sainte Croix was, at length, found dead in his laboratory ; the glass mask, which he always wore while preparing his poisons, having accidentally dropped off, he became suffocated. In his possession was found a small box, to which was affixed a written request, that, after his death, it might be delivered to the Mar- chioness Brinvillier ; or if she should not be living, that it should be burnt. The authorities did neither, but opened it, and found it to contain an abundance of poisons of every kind, with labels on each, describing their effects, as proved by experiments made on animals. The Marchioness endeavored to obtain possession of the box, by bribing the officers of justice, but finally failing in all her attempts, she left France. She was subsequently taken by stratagem from a convent, whither she had fled for protection and conveyed to Paris. She was there tried, convicted, beheaded and afterwards burnt. The execution of the Marchioness did not suppress the prac- tice. Both in high and low life, there continued to occur occa- sional instances of secret poisoning. These were so frequent that in 1679, a court called the Chambre de poison, or Chamber Ar- dente, was organized, charged with the special duty of watching, searching after, and punishing poisoners. Two women, La Vi- goreux and La Voisin, were detected by it in carrying on a great traffic in poisons. Besides selling secret poison they distributed philtres, thus hot only ridding women of bad husbands but also recovering lost lovers. On the 22d of February, 1680, they were burnt alive, after their hands had been bored through with 292 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. a red hot iron and cut off. There were also several other exe- cutions by the common hangman. Difficulties have always existed in obtaining an accurate know- ledge of the composition of secret poisons. Governments have endeavored to conceal the recipes at the time of the criminal pro- cedures. In France they were burnt, together with the criminals. At Rome, Pope Alexander VII., caused them to be shut up in the Castle of St. Angelo. It is therefore, to some extent, a, matter of conjecture, what were the component parts of there secret poisons. In the casket of Sainte Croix were found sublimate, opium, regulus of antimony, and vitriol. Besides these, a large quantity of poison was found ready prepared, the principal in- gredients of which, the physicians were unable to distinguish. The poisons prepared, both by Toffania and Brinvillier, were in all probability, arsenical mixtures, or arsenical neutral salts. The symptoms, such as loss of appetite, faintness, gnawing pains in the stomach, loss of strength without any visible cause, a continual indisposition, followed by a wasting of the lungs', a slow fever, &c. ; all appear to indicate the action of that d.in- gerous poison. There may, however, have been different kinds of poisonous preparations, as opium and cantharides have been, by many, supposed to have been the principal ingredients. There now exists little apprehension of secret poisoning, in the sense in which that term has been understood. The great ex- tension of medical and chemical knowledge, has tended both to unveil the true nature and composition of the secret poison, and also to destroy those sources of credulity in which it found so strong a hold, to exercise a power and influence over the imagi- nations of men. It has, therefore, ceased to be of much impor- tance, except as a curious page in the history of man and of Medical Jurisprudence. 4. The methods by which poisons may become introduced into the system. These methods are various, but require simply a brief enu- meration. The most usual mode of finding their way into the system, is by the mouth and oesophagus. Where large quanti- poisons. 293 ties are required to produce the proper effect, it may be doubt- ful whether any other avenue maybe sufficient. Those of the more active kind, and such as are easily volatilized, may be in troduced through the nose, in the form of odors. The process of inspiration may introduce them through the lungs. They may also be injected into the rectum, in the form of injection. They may be introduced directly into the circulating system, by opening and inserting them into a blood vessel. It is also as- serted by some, although it is denied by others, that in some in- stances they may find their way through the skin by the process of absorption. 2 Beck's, 240. In whatever way they may be introduced, the next enquiry is 5. As to their mode of action. This is of two kinds local and remote. Of the local mode of action, there are three varieties. 1. Corrosion. This is a chemical decomposition of the tissue to which the poisonous substance is applied. A familiar instance of this may be found in the concentrated mineral acids, which corrode and disorganize the textures with which they come in contact. The fixed alkalis have also a similar operation. 2. Irritation. This is a much less powerful effect than the pre- ceding. Its immediate result, and the evidence of it, is inflam- mation. This is not only the first, but is also the slightest eflect, produced by this class of substances. There are many instances of this variety. Alcohol reddens the stomach. The. mineral acids in their diluted state, arsenic, nitre, cantharides, euphor- bium, may all cause irritation, and consequent inflammation in the stomach and intestines. From the first, or inflammatory state, the part may pass into that of ulceration, and ultimately of gangrene, its severest effects. By inflammation, ulceration and gangrene, a breach may be made in the texture of the organ, but this is different from corrosion. These two effects may be produced in any tissue or organ of the body ; as the skin, mu- cous membrane of the stomach and intestines, cellular tissue, se rous membranes of the chest and abdomen, or in the muscular fibre. Chrislison on Poisons, 3. 294 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. 3. Nervous impressions. These consist of peculiar impressions made on the sentient extremities of the nerves, which are un- accompanied by any visible change of structure. For instance, monkshood, when chewed, causes numbness and tingling in the lips and tongue ; opium, applied to the inner coat of the intes tines of a rabbit during life, immediately paralyzed their muscu- lar contractions, without, for some time, affecting the general sys- tem. The prussic acid, applied to the hind leg of a frog, palsied it in thirty-five minutes, while the other hind leg continued per- fectly sensible and irritable. These facts go clearly to show, that there may be local impressions of a purely nervous nature, with- out any perceptible organic change. Remote action defines the power which certain poisonous sub- stances possess, of affecting an organ remote from that to which they are applied. Thus cantharides irritates the organ with which it is brought into contact, and also affects remotely the urinary and generative organs. Morphine, applied to a wound, or thrown into the stomach, exercises a direct influence upon the brain. So, also, the strychnia tribe affect the spinal marrow. A distinction is taken, by some, in relation to the manner of action ; a few appearing to have a common, but most poisons a specific action. Thus, ±he oxalic acid exerts a corrosive action upon the lining membrane of the stomach and bowels, exciting inflamma- tion around the parts destroyed. The same constitutional shock attends the action of this acid, as accompanies all severe local in- juries. Arsenic, taken into the stomach, irritates and inflames its lining membrane, and also causes cramps in the extremities ; these being the usual attendants in all acute inflammations of the lining membrane of the stomach and bowels. When applied to the skin, or inhaled into the lungs, it also excites inflammation of the same lining membrane of the stomach, with which it does not come in contact. This shows, that the production of in- flammation of this membrane, is its specific action. The remote action of poisons naturally leads to the inquiry, as to the manner in which the poison is conveyed from one or- gan to another. Two channels present themselves. These are poisons. 295 the bood vessels, and nerves. The conveyance by the first being by absorption ; that of the second, by sympathy. 1. In regard to the blood vessels, and their action by absorp- tion, several facts go plainly to show, that many poisons act through the blood. 1. They disappear, during life, from the shut cavities into which they have been introduced. They are absorbed. Four ounces of a solution of oxalic acid were injected into the peri- toneal sac of a cat, which was killed in fourteen minutes after ; and yet, on opening it, although none of the poison had escaped by the wound, scarcely a drachm was found remaining. Christi- son on Poisons., 9. 2. Many poisons are found to act with rapidity, when they are applied to a part which is attached to the body of arteries and veins only. This has been proved in regard to opium, to nux vomica^ hydrocyanic acid, and diluted oxalic acid. Many poisons will not act, when they are applied to a part of which the circulation has been arrested, although the connection, by nerves, has been left with the body entire. The hydrocyanic acid, when introduced into the hind leg of an animal, after the abdominal aorta has been tied, will not act until the ligature is removed, and then acts with rapidity, lb., 9-10. 3. It has been clearly ascertained that there is a difference in the absorbing power of the different tissues. A poison introduced into a wound, or injected into a vein, is absorbed with the great- est degree of rapidity. The surface of serous membranes less rapidly absorbs ; and that of the mucous membrane of the ali - mentary canal, exercises the least of all absorbent power. No doubt can, therefore, remain, but that poisons are absorb- ed, and pass into the circulating system. But are they necessa- rily detected in that system, or in parts of the body remote from the place of their introduction 1 Some poisons have been dis- covered in the blood, and soft parts of, the body. For instance, sal ammonia has been detected in the serum of horses ; camphor in the blood of the vena cavse ; copper in the liver, and lead in the liver, spinal cord, and muscles. 296 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. It is not often, however, that poisons can be detected in the blood, although they may have entered it. 1 . The quantity of poison that enters it is so small, when comJ pared with its entire mass, as to render it of difficult detection; after being distributed through the whole body. 2. The poison may have passed off with the excretions, during life, and thus have gone beyond the reach of analysis. Iodine, for instance, passes off rapidly by the urine, and alcohol by the breath. 3. Some poisons are, in a short period of time, removed from the blood, and concentrated in particular organs. Where ani- mals have been poisoned slowly, by small doses of the prepara- tions of copper, no part of the body was found to contain any of the poison, except the liver. So, also, sugar of lead, admin- istered in the same way, could be discovered no where else, ex- cept in the liver, muscles, and spinal cord. Christison on Per- sons, 16. 4. The poison may be decomposed in the blood. Some ob- viously act upon that fluid, which implies that corresponding changes are effected in them. Nitric oxide gas gives the blood a chocolate color, and deprives it of its power of coagulating. Sulphuretted hydrogen and hydrocyanic acid effect obvious changes in the blood. Other poisons, in all probability, are de-. composed in the blood. Eight and an half grains of oxalic acid were injected into the femoral vein of a dog, causing its death in thirty seconds. Here it was impossible that the poison could have passed off by the excretions, and yet not a particle could be detected in the blood after death. It must, therefore, have been decomposed by the blood. Many other poisons are destroyed in the same way. 2. In regard to the nerves, and their action by sympathy. Although all toxicologists seem fully agreed that poisons are absorbed, and are conveyed to the different organs by means of the circulation, yet there has ever failed to be an equal unanimity of opinion, in reference to their transference, by sympathy, through the medium of the nerves. The correct settlement of the ques- tion is of some importance practically, because, if absorption is poisons. 297 the only medium of diffusion, the use of ligatures, and cupping glasses, might always be resorted to with, at least, some prospect of success, wherever circumstances and opportunities favored the application. The advocates of sympathy urge, that impressions, other than those of the external senses, are conveyed, from one organ to another, by means of the nerves ; that acute inflammation of the stomach, for instance, proves fatal before death can result from the suspension of digestion ; that severe wounds of the stomach may cause death, even before inflammation can commence ; and that rupture, from over distention, may produce almost instant death, without any inflammation, or any material haemorrhage. Christison on Poisons, 5, 6. So also in the swallowing of corrosives, as the mineral acids, the fatal result follows in a short space of time, and the symptoms are imperceptible pulse, fainting and excessive weakness. These are not only identical with those that accompany injury from disease or violence, but are also such as show very clearly that remote organs are affected. Again, dilution of the concentrated mineral acids actuaEy facilitates their more rapid absorption, but, at the same time, diminishes or entirely destroys," their re- mote action. But the argument the most generally urged is, that some poi- sons produce so instantaneous an effect, as to preclude the pos- sibility of their diffusion, through any other means, than a nervous agency. The hydrocyanic or prussic acid, for instance, acts with a celerity, which is compared by Magendie to the swiftness of a cannon ball, or thunderbolt. From some experiments made with the diluted acid, several dogs were brought under its in- fluence in ten, eight, five and three seconds. One animal was killed outright in four seconds. Christison, 7. Strychnia has been known to commence acting in fifteen seconds. So also has alcohol on animals. The answer to this is, that from recent experiments, it has been ascertained, that poisons are much more rapidly diffused, through the medium of the circulation, than was formerly sup- posed. From experiments made by Mr. Blake, see Guy, 525-6, 298 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. it appears, that in the dog the time required for a poison to pass from the jugular vein to the lungs, was from four to six seconds ; from the same vein to the coronary arteries of the heart seven secoDds ; from the same vein to the carotid artery, from five to seven seconds ; and from the aorta to the capillaries, four seconds. Introduced into the jugular vein, it was distributed through the whole body in nine seconds. The time required for it to com- plete its circulation through the system of the horse, was from twelve to twenty seconds. From these, and some other facts, Dr. Guy is of the opinion, that absorption and diffusion through the blood vessels, is the only method, by which, the poisons are transferred from one organ, or one part of the system, to another. The physiologist Muller was also of the belief, that all poisons entered the circula- tion before producing their injurious effects. To account for the rapid diffusion of the prussic acid, he supposed it possessed great volatility, and power of expansion ; by which it was enabled to diffuse itself through the blood more rapidly than that fluid cir- culates ; to permeate the animal tissues very quickly, and in a manner independent of its distribution by means of the blood ; and thus to produce the peculiar material changes in the central organ of the nervous system more quickly in proportion as it is applied nearer to it. Guy, 527. There are some facts, however, that are very diflicult of ex- planation except upon the ground of diffusion by sympathy. " If the nose of a rabbit be introduced into a receiver filled with hydrocyanic acid vapor, the animal drops dead instantly." Ani- mals have been seen to fall prostrate on being bit by a Viper, and " others void their urine and excrements at the very instant, as if their spincters had become paralytic at the moment of their being bit." Guy, 527. The probability therefore is, that both absorption and sympathy are among the instrumentalities, by which, poisons are enabled to work out their injurious effects upon different organs or parts of the human system remote from the place of their introduction. When sympathy is the mode of action, if death is the result, it must be ascribed to the shock impressed on the general nervous system, from the contact of poisons. 299 the poison with the nerves of the living tissues. Taylor's Med. Juris., 27. 6. The causes, or circumstances, which modify the action of poisons. These are various, and may be briefly summed up in the following. 1. The quantity administered. Here, as a general rule, the larger the quantity, the more severe the effect produced. What is very remarkable, the effect, in some cases, varies with the difference in quantity. For instance,, arsenic, in small doses, may cause inflammation of the stomach ; in a large one, it may affect the action of the heart. Probably the most remarkable poison of this description is the oxalic acid. That, according to the dose given, may corrode the stomach, or act on the heart, or spine, or brain. 2. The state of aggregation in which it is administered. The general law is, that poisons act far more energetically, in a state of solution, than in the solid state. In the former state, they are more quickly diffused over a large surface, and are also better fitted for entering the bibulous vessels. Poisons must be dis- solved, previous to being absorbed. In some cases, the mode of action is different when administered in the solid or liquid state. Camphor in the former state, generally causes inflammation of the stomach ; in the latter, delirium, or tetanus, and coma. Some poisons act still more efficiently when reduced to a state of vapor. Christison on Poisons, 21 . 3. Chemical combination. The effect of this varies with differ- ent poisonous substances. Those which possess a purely chemi- cal action, like the alkalis and mineral acids, lose a part, or all, their active properties, when brought into combination with other substances. The resulting substance possesses new proper- ties, being more or less active according to its solubility. All those poisonous substances, which possess a specific action, con- tinue to exert it in their different combinations. The salts of morphia, for instance, all possess the same specification whatever be their combinations, the difference being only in degree. The same is true of strychnia, arsenious, hydrocyanic, and oxalic acids. 300 MKDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. 4. Mixture. The effect of this varies considerably with differ- ent poisons. So far as they are diluted by the mixture, their activity should be lessened, both because the quantity is smaller, and the time necessary for their absorption is prolonged. But if the poison is an irritant of a powerful character, and acts through the blood, a moderate dilution will enable i't to enter the vessels more easily. This is particularly the case with the oxalic acid. Concentrated, it is feebly irritant or corrosive. Diluted, it speedily enters the blood and causes death. There is another effect of mixture totally different, viz., that which arises from the fact, that by means of it, a mechanical impediment is thrown in the way of the poison's acting so directly upon the animal membranes. This is aptly illustrated by sup- posing arsenic to be taken at the same time that a meal of vic- tuals is eaten. If the meal consists of solid food, the effects of the poison would be very slowly manifested. If taken with liquids, such as porridge, and still more if mixed with tea, beer or water, those effects would be developed much more rapidly. This furnishes a reason why many poisons, when taken with a meal, are much longer in producing their usual effects than when taken at any other time. They are also in general less dangerous, because, as in the case of arsenic, a small portion only touching the membrane of the stomach, may produce vomiting to such an extent, as to throw up the entire contents of the stomach in-, eluding the poison also. An indication is here furnished in regard to remedies. Finely powdered charcoal or magnesia, when taken in sufficient quan- ' tities, may so envelop the poison as to prevent it from exerting its hurtful effects. So also mucilaginous substances, freely ad- ministered, may afford relief upon the same principle. Chrisii- son, 22-3; Guy, 528-9. 5. Difference of Tissues and Organ. In the case of corrosive and irritants, a difference of tissue can cause no essential varia, tion in their action. It is in those poisons which are absorbed, and act through the medium of the blood, that difference of tissue works a variation. The point in which the difference consists, POISONS. 301 in reference u the speedy action of poisons, consists in the dif- ferent absorbing powers of the tissues. Poisons act the most speedily and energetically when injected into a vein. No obstacle is then presented to their immediate diffusion through the entire system, by means of the circulation. They also act about as speedily and effectively on the mucous mem - brane of the pulmonary air cells, and that whether introduced in a fluid or gaseous form. The serous membranes possess great activity of absorption. Next to injection into a vein, or introduction into a wound, this tissue affords the most readily the means of introducing and cir- culating a poison through the system. Hence many poisons act much more rapidly through the peritoneum, than they do through the stomach. The mucous membrane of the stomach and intestines, next to the serous, affords the most rapidly absorbing surface. The power of the cellular tissue to absorb, has never been very clearly ascertained. The cutaneous absorption of poisons is always slow. The cu- ticle and intricate capillaries of the true skin, present many ob- stacles in the way of a rapid absorption. Some have even de- nied that poisons can be absorbed through the unbroken skin. It is a fact, however, that most gaseous poisons, and some solid ones, when volatilized, will act when simply placed in contact with the skin. In regard to nervous tissue, there are many active poisons, being all of the narcotic class, that appear to act on the sentient ex- tremities of the nerves, and indirectly, through the nerves, upon the brain and spinal marrow. It is a curious fact, that not one of these acts at all on the cut surface of the brain or nerves, or upon any part of the course of the nerves. Christison, 24 - 5. 6. Habit. So far as this has any effect, it is generally to lessen the action of poisons. The system, from having become habi- tuated to their action, grows less and less affected by them. This has a more special application to the narcotic class, where the poison is specific, and acts by virtue of its own inherent pecu- liar qualities. The two poisons, in regard to which the power 302 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. of habit is the most frequently exercised, are opium and alcohol. The opium eaters and the intemperate, sometimes astonish us by the mighty power which habit comes to possess in them. This is probably owing to the rapid decomposition of the poison in some of the tissues. The stomach acquires an increased power of decomposing the poison, in much the same manner, as it ac- quires an increased facility in digesting some substances at first indigestible. All those poisons, however, to which the system can become habituated, produce in the end extremely injurious effects upon it. Many of the inorganic poisons, particularly the corrosives, re- main little affected by the force of habit. Those that enter the blood, are supposed to have their activity rather increased than diminished by this force. ' The effects of cumulative poisons, or those which are capable of gradually accumulating in the system, and of ultimately producing their injurious effects, ought not to be considered as acting under the dominion of habit. 7. Idiosyncrasy. By this term is understood that peculiarity of constitution, which subjects the organism to be affected by the action of agents, in a different manner, or in a different degree from others. Both this and habit, enter as a disturbing force, into the ordinary normal effects of poison, and the extent of the variety they are enabled to produce, should be capable of being fully appreciated by the medical jurist. Idiosyncrasy may operate in three different ways. 1 . It may render less or more affected than others through the action of the same agent. A few grains of mercury may sali- vate one man, without in any perceptible degree, affecting an- other. So also, it is perfectly well known, that alcohol, in the same quantities, produces extremely different effects in degree, in its action upon different systems. So also the same quantities of arsenic will produce different effects upon different constitu- tions, and that entirely irrespective of any diseased affec tion. 2. It is possible for a substance, which ordinarily produces the same effect upon individuals, to produce in one, having a pecu- liar idiosyncrasy, a very different one. Thus Epsom salts have poison's 303 been known to act like opium, and opium to have a purgative effect. Guy, 530. 3. Owing to this same peculiarity, some substances are actually poisonous to some individuals, which, to the generality of man- kind are not only harmless, but even nutritious. Different kinds of fish act upon some in the manner of poisons, producing faint- ing, sickness, pain of the stomach, and sometimes attended with dangerous consequences. The same has also occurred in the case of mushrooms. There are probably few articles of food, in regard to which, such idiosyncrasies may not, in a few rare in- stances, be met with. Christison on Poisons, 28. 8. Disease. This, like habit, tends in general to impair the ac- tivity of poisons ; the system being rendered by it less suscepti- ble of being influenced by them. The extent, as well as the de- gree of influence, depends much upon the kind and nature of the poison, and also upon the character and severity of the dis- ease. The poisons chiefly influenced are from the organic king- doms. They beloag principally to the narcotic class. Those from the inorganic kingdom are much less affected. So also much depends on the disease. In severe dysentery and cholera, the susceptibility of the system to be influenced by opium is very much diminished. One reason may be, that the poison is then carried with great rapidity through the alimentary canal. So also when the system is laboring under great weak- ness, the power of absorption is much diminished ; and hence the poison is not taken up with the usual quickness by the ab- sorbent vessels. There are perhaps no diseases that impair, more powerfully, the activity of poisons, than tetanus and the more active forms of mania. In both these, the nervous system is in a state of peculiar excitement, by means of which, the ordinary action of the poison is, to a great extent, counteracted. There are a few diseases which increase the susceptibility of the system to the action of poisons. This occurs whenever the poison and the disease both tend to bring on the same pathologi- cal state of the system, or of any particular organ. Thus, in cases where apoplexy has actually supervened or is threatened, opium administered produces a much more powerful effect. So 804 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. in case of inflammation of the alimentary canal, any irritating substance may produce a dangerous impression. Christison,Bl. It ought to be here remarked, that sleep has a strong effect in delaying the action of poisons. All the organic functions are then carried on more slowly, and there is, therefore, less suscep- tibility in the system, to be influenced by the action of those agents. Hence, when sleep either supervenes, or is produced immediately upon the taking of a poison, the ordinary effects of it may be expected to be delayed. Guy, 530. As the duties of the medical jurist may be said to be accom- plished when he has ascertained the fact of the existence of a poison, and has rendered clear to others the evidence upon which it rests, very little time can be occupied in remarks upon the treatment in case of poisoning. Antidotes are given with two views: One is, to alter the chemical nature of the poison, and thus deprive it of its delete- rious quality, before it comes within its sphere of action ; the other is, to excite a contrary action in the system, and thus to control its poisonous action after it has begun. An instance of the first, is the neutralization of a mineral acid, by the administration of an alkali. In regard to the sec- ond, we have little knowledge of any substances that are capable of acting as counter-poisons, or in any way to excite a contrary action in the system, and thus to control the poisonous action after it has begun. The following are the antidotes, as enumerated by Christison, in his work on poisons, 33 : When given in time, magnesia or chalk is a complete antidote for the mineral acids, and oxalic acid ; albumen for corrosive sublimate and verdigris ; bark for tartar emetic ; common salt for lunar caustic ; sulphate of soda or magnesia for sugar of lead ; muriate of baryta, chloride of lime, or soda, for liver of sulphur ; vinegar or oil, for the fixed alkalis ; and these substances act either by neutralizing the cor- rosive power of the poison, or by forming with it an insoluble compound. Where a poison has not been taken into the stomach, but some external application has been made of it, the object is, to poisons. 305 prevent its entering the blood, or to remove it from the local ves- sels into which it has found entrance. One mode of doing this, is to apply cupping-glasses to the part where the poison has been introduced. This may prevent its further absorption, and suck the blood out of the wound, washing the poison away with it. Another method, is to check the circulation by the application of a ligature. By the gradual tightening and loosening of it, the poison may sometimes be so gradually introduced into the gene- ral system, as to be productive of little or no injury. It has also been proposed to withdraw as much as possible of the blood be- low the ligature, for the purpose of extracting the poison ; or as much of it as can readily be done, together with the blood. Ckristison on Poisons, 34-5. 7. The general sources of evidence of the administration of poisons. Under this head is embraced a reference to those sources of evidence, which may be appealed to in all suspected cases of general poisoning, no regard being had to any particular poison given. The object is, to render the general fact of poisoning possible, probable, or certain ; or improbable, or impossible. These sources of evidence are five in number, viz : 1 . The symptoms developed ; 2. The appearances presented on a post- mortem examination ; 3. Chemical analysis ; 4. Experiments on animals; and, 5. Moral circumstances. Of these in their order, 1. The symptoms. These were formerly mwch relied on as evi- dence of general poisoning. They are not now regarded as fur- nishing anything more than a high probability. There are cer- tain peculiar features of the symptoms that are to be regarded. These have reference — 1 . To the suddenness of their occurrence. The symptoms devel- oped by the more active poisons, whether irritants or narcotics, are extremely sudden ; some are instantaneous, and most of them occur within an hour after the poison has been taken. But the most violent may be so administered in small doses, as to cause the symptoms to be developed slowly. Even corrosive sublimate may be so administered, as to cause at first only a mild salivation. In criminal cases which arise for investigation 306 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. in courts of justice, the more active poisons are commonly given, and the dose administered is very large ; so that the fact general- ly remains true, that the symptoms are sudden in their occur rence. 2. The second feature to be noticed, is the regularity in their increase. This feature cannot be universal. Where the poison- ing is by repeated small doses, there will be remissions and ex- acerbations, the same as in natural diseases. Some poisons ad- mit of exacerbations and remissions, even when given in one large dose, while others produce violent symptoms in frequent paroxysms. Of these latter, the strychnia tribe afford instances. In poisoning with arsenic, after the first five or six hours, there is often a remission, and a subsequent return with increased vio- lence. Christison^ 42. It is, nevertheless, generally true, that the symptoms of poi soning are steady in their progress. 3. The third feature is uniformity in their nature. This, al- though stated as a general characteristic, is nevertheless true in the case of but comparatively few poisons. Many poisons cause very different symptoms at the close, from what they do at the beginning. The first symptoms of arsenic, may be inflamma- tion of the alimentary canal ; afterwards, palsy or epilepsy. Nux vomica may excite, at first, violent tetanus; afterwards, inflammation of the stomach and bowels. Even the fact of change is sometimes cited as evidence of poisoning. Although, therefore, the presence of this feature generally adds little, if any weight, to the evidence in favor of death by poison ; yet its absence may sometimes afford even positive proof in favor of natural death. Changes may occur in the symptoms, during their progress, that may be incompatible with the known effects of poison, and capable of being accounted for only on the sup- position of natural disease. Chrislison, 46. 4. The fourth feature is, that the symptoms begin soon after a meal. Although poisons, as mushrooms, may remain for a long time in the alimentary canal before their effects commence, yet the more common poisons, such as arsenic, corrosive sublimate, the mineral acids, oxalic acid, nux vomica, and some others, be- poisons. 307 gin to develope their symptoms soon after they have been taken. It must, however, be borne in mind, that poisons may be intro- duced into the system through other avenues than the oesopha- gus and stomach. So, also, there are causes that may delay, for some time, the action of poisons. One of these is certain diseases, as already mentioned j another is sleep, occurring immediately or soon after taking the poison. This should always be taken into consideration, in connexion with the time intervening be- tween the taking of a meal and the commencement of the symp- toms. 5. The fifth, and last feature noticeable, is the appearance of the symptoms during a state of perfect health. This, although generally, is by no means universally, true. It has no applica- tion in case of slow poisoning. Poisons may also be administer- ed to a person at the time diseased. The symptoms developed by the poison may be analogous to those produced by the disease, which would render the case extremely embarrassing. Christi- son, 44-5. We have brought under review, briefly, the principal features .')f the symptoms which characterize general poisoning. It now remains to examine how far they are distinctive, or can be dis- tinguished from those of natural disease. 1 . As to suddenness of occurrence. This is also a peculiarity of many diseases. The plague, inflammation of the stomach, in- flammation of the intestines, cholera, may, for the most part do, all develope their symptoms suddenly ; generally running on speedily to a fatal termination. Diseases of the heart, and apo- plexy, may also prove suddenly fatal, without previous warning. This feature, therefore, except what can be collected from par- ticular poisons, cannot be regarded as distinctive. 2. The regularity of increase is also to be noticed in many diseases. Apoplexy, cholera, most acute diseases, when they prove rapidly fatal, are marked by a regularity in the increase of their sypmtoms. 3. In their uniformity they are hardly less distinctive. . Many diseases are characterized by the same uniformity. i. The symptoms beginning soon after a meal. This also occmy 308 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. in some diseases. Apoplexy is likely to take place after a hearty meal. So also is cholera, occurring from some causes. Disten- tion of stomach, rupture of its coats, are likely to happen soon after an ingestion of food and drinks. As the diseases, however, that have this characteristic, are comparatively few in number, and of unfrequent occurrence, this feature is justly regarded as entitled to considerable weight. It is not alone as positive evidence, that this feature is entitled to consideration. Its negative force is often greater than its posi- tive ; that is, where the symptoms are such as usually character- ize the most active poisons, but their occurrence is so long after taking any food, drink, or medicine, as to exclude all reasonable probability that they could have been produced by the action of any poison which was taken with any such food, drink or medi- cine. This was particularly exemplified in the case of the crown Piince of Sweden, which occurred in 1810. While reviewing his troops, he was observed suddenly to waver on his horse, and soon afterwards fell. He was immediately found insensible, and ex- pired in half an hour. A rumor was circulated that he was poisoned. It appeared in proof, that he had taken nothing after he had breakfasted, which was about four hours previous to his falling from his horse. No other poison than an active narcotic could have caused the symptoms developed in the case, and such could only have produced them when given in a large dose. No poison of this character, could have had its eifects suspended for four hours, and then have proved so suddenly fatal. It was un- doubtedly an attack of apoplexy, of which he had already had some warnings, and of which some marks were found about the head after death. Christison en Poisons, 47-8. The practice is sometimes resorted to, of substituting poison- ous mixtures, for medicinal drafts or powder. In the case of Sir Theodosius Boughton, who was poisoned in 1781, by his brother-in-law, Donnellan, the most important evidence against the prisoner was the fact, that alarming symptoms came on in two minutes after the deceased had swallowed what was sup- poisons. 309 posed to be a simple medical draught. Laurel water was sub- stituted for the medicine. 5. The symptoms first appearing while the body is in a state of perfect health. Although almost all acute diseases commence during health, yet those of the inflammatory kind, seldom begin without some adequate ■and obvious natural cause. From a careful review of every thing relating to symptoms, it is obvious, that the medical jurist cannot be justified in placing any very great reliance upon them alone in any case of suspected poisoning. They should by no means be neglected, as they may furnish the first hints of the cause of mischief. They may fur- nish evidence of probability, but not of certainty. They may demonstrate the impossibility of the poisoning. They may also furnish a necessary link, in the chain of proof, to determine whether the poison was the cause of death. In illustration of the last remark, Dr. Christison cites the case of Charles Munn tried in 1824, for procuring abortion and of murder by poisoning The evidence went to show, that arsenic had been given, under the effects of which, the deceased labored for twelve days. After that, she recovered, and in two weeks was free of every symp- tom, except weakness and pains in the hands and feet. She soon afterwards became affected with headache and sleeplessness, and died in nineteen days under symptoms of obscure general fever, but without any local inflammation. The medical witnesses in that case decided, that, admitting the first symptoms to be owing to arsenic, the death could not be ascribed to it with any degree of certainty. 2. The second source of evidence consists in the appearances which present themselves on a post-mortem examination. These also were formerly much relied upon, but with little reason. There are but very few poisons that leave any distinctive marks upon the organization. Dr. Christison thus briefly states his conclusions in reference to this source of evidence. " The ap- pearances after death, which are really morbid, and which may be produced by poisons, are in one great class, the signs of in- flammation of the alimentary canal in its progressive stages, in another class, the signs of congestion within the head, and in a 310 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. third, a combination of the effects of the two preceding classes ( that neither set of appearances is invariably caused by the poi- sons which usually cause them ; that congestion within the head is really seldom produced by those which are currently imagined to produce it ; and that most of the appearances of both kinds are exactly similar to those left by many natural diseases." It is of little use here to dwell further on this source of evidence. It will be found, when we arrive at the mineral acids, that the corrosives, and some of the simply irritant poisons, leave distincl traces in the body, although sometimes not so easily distin guishable from those left by some natural diseases. It was formerly supposed that unusual blackness pr lividity ol skin afforded a general indication of death by poisoning. A more enlarged experience has given to this a decided negative, and has also affirmed as true, that there is no difference in kind; between the lividity that succeeds death by poison, and that which follows death from disease. Nor does early putrefaction, as was once supposed, follow death by poisoning. It is not generally caused by poisons, and in some cases, as in that of arsenic, the putrefactive process is delayed by the action of the poison. It should be remarked, that post-mortem appearances may sometimes furnish negative evidence that may be valuable. Where, for instance, it is alleged that corrosives have been ad- ministered, the absence < of all corrosion would serve to disprove the charge. So also the entire absence of all inflammation, in a case of alleged poison by irritants, would render doubtful or en- tirely disprove, the truth of the allegation. If a poison is introduced into the body after death, with a view to inculpate an innocent person, the post-mortem appearances may become important. The absence of the peculiar appear- ances produced by the poison would, in such cases, frustrate the malicious purpose. 3. Evidence from chemical analysis. To this source of proof is justly attached a high degree of importance. Although its fail- ure, for reasons which will presently be rendered apparent, can- not be received as evidence that no poison has been administered, POISONS. 31] yet its clear detection of the poison, must always satisfy the af- firmative enquiry. In order, however, to rest upon this evi- dence, the poison should be found either in the stomach, intes- tines or gullet ; or in the matter vomited ; or in articles of food, drink, or medicine, of which the sufferer has partaken; or in articles found in the possession of the prisoner, and unaccounted fur. The main enquiry should always be in relation to the cause of death. Although other apparent causes may develope them- selves, yet this should not supercede the investigation of any suspicious substance, exhibiting the appearance of a poison. An interesting case is given by Dr. Christison, 55-6, quoted from Dr. Willdberg, of Rostock, of a girl, who actually expired, while her father was chastising her severely for stealing. Her death was supposed to have been the result of the beating, but, on the examination, although there were found the marks of many stripes on the arms, shoulders and back, with extravasated blood under them, yet they did not appear, by any means, sufficient to account for death. On opening the stomach it was found very much inflamed, and lined with a white powder which chemical analysis proved to be arsenic. The girl had taken arsenic through fear of her father's displeasure after being detected, had vomited during the flogging, and died in slight convulsions. If, on the closest examination, no poison can be detected, it does not therefore folliw that none has been administered. For, 1 . It may have been discharged by vomiting and purging. In the case of Thorn, tried in 1821, although the deceased had clearly died of poisoning by arsenic, yet none could be detected in the stomach or its contents. He had lived seven days, and all the time had labored under frequent vomiting. In another case, arsenic could not be found in the matter vomited twenty- four hours after it had been swallowed. In another case, a grocer died eight hours after swallowing an ounce of arsenic, and yet chemical analysis could detect none whatever in his body. It is nevertheless true, that poisonous substances not easily soluble, and which have been taken in a state of minute^division, do ad- here to the villous coat of the stomach with such strong tenacity 312 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. as not to be easily dislodged by vomiting. Many instances of this have occurred in the case of arsenic. Christison, 56-7. The length of time a poison, which has excited vomitirsg, may remain in the stomach, will depend on its solubility; the fre- quency of the vomiting ; the remedies taken ; and other similar circumstances. 2. The poison may have been absorbed, and may thus have disappeared. This is more especially the case where poisons are taken in a liquid form, particularly laudanum. It has taken place where solid opium has been taken. In a case of laudanum, which occurred in 1823, none could be detected, although the circumstances left no doubt but that it had been swallowed seven or eight hours before death. The readiness and celerity with which the absorption would take place, must depend much upon whether the poison was in a liquid form ; or, if it was not, whether it was easily soluble. Some mistakes have been made in arriving at hasty conclusions that no poison has been taken, because none could be found in the stomach, which have occur- red in consequence of overlooking its disappearance through the means of absorption. 3. Poisons may be decomposed, and hence not be found in the stomach or its contents. Many poisons are destroyed by the pro- cess of digestion. Some of the mineral poisons are also decom- posed in the stomach. Among these are corrosive sublimate, lunar caustic, and hydrochlorate of tin. Their decomposition is owing to a chemical, not a vital process. Other poisons become changed by entering into combination with other substances, without themselves undergoing decompo- sition. The decay of the body, prior to examination, may also have caused the disappearance of the poison. Where any con- siderable portion of time has elapsed between dissolution and the examination, " some poisons, such as oxalic acid, might be dissolved and then exude ; others, such as the vegetable narco- tics, will undergo putrefaction ; and others still, such as prussic acid, are partly volatilized, partly decomposed, so as to be undis- tinguishable in the course of a few days only." The results of experimental enquiries conducted by Orflla and poisons. 313 I esueur were, that after a time the acids become neutralised by the ammonia disengaged during the decay of animal matter ; that by the action of the animal matter the salts of mercury, anti- mony, copper, tin, gold, silver, and likewise the salts of the vegetable alkaloids, undergo chemical decomposition, in conse- quence of which the bases become less soluble in water, or alto- gether insoluble ; that acids may be detected after several years interment, not always, however, in the free state ; that the bases of the decomposed metallic salts may also be found after inter- ment for several years ; that arsenic, opium and cantharides un- dergo little change after a long interval of time, and are scarcely more difficult to discover in decayed, than in recent animal mix- tures, but that hydrocyanic acid disappears very soon, so as to be undistinguishable in the course of a few days-. Chrislison on Poisons, 61. The discovery of poison, by means of the chemical tests, af- fords undoubtedly the clearest and most satisfactory evidence that can be obtained. Some have even gone so far as to insist that no case of poisoning should be considered as proven, unless the roison had been discovered by these tests. A case, however, is related by Dr. Christison, 62-3, in which although the tests f died to discover any, yet no doubt could really exist but that poison had been administered. A man, known to have some design on another, persuaded him to breakfast with him at a tavern. They had beef-steaks, fried potatoes, eels, claret and rum. Soon after commencing, the guest complained of feeling unwell, and began to vomit violently. This continued, with ex- cruciating pain in the abdomen, long before a physician was pro- cured. The physician, at first, imputed the whole to cholera, but on returning in the evening and finding him dead, said he had been poisoned. The body presented much external lividity, contraction of the fingers, great inflammation of the stomach and intestines, the appearance resembling that of gangrene. Some fluid was found in the stomach, but on analyzing it, no ar- senic or other poison could be detected. The attention was turned particularly to arsenic, as the priso- ner was proved to have bought that poison, and to have made 314 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. a solution of some white powder in bis kitchen not long before the occurrence of this event. The deceased also presented symp- toms of stupor, and other signs of derangement of the nervous system, remarked in rapid cases of poisoning with arsenic. Un- der all these circumstances, " the kind and character of the symp- toms, their commencement during a meal, the rapidity of death, the signs of violent inflammation in the stomach after so short an illness, and the facility with which the absence of poison in the contents of the stomach may be accounted for, more espe- cially if it be supposed that the poison was administered in solu- tion," leave little doubt but that arsenic had been administered, most probably in solution, although none could be detected in the stomach or its contents. 4. Experiments on Animals. The results obtained from this source of evidence are not often introduced in courts of justice. Several objections have been made to their introduction. It is objected 1. That what is> poison to man is not always such to the lower animals. From the experiments of Orfila, it would seem, that the cat and dog are two animals generally affected by poisons in nearly the same way as man. And although poisons act on them, yet they do not act to the same extent, nor do all of them in the same manner. In general they act on them less violently than on man, but alcohol acts more powerfully. Opium, and some other poisons, produce different symptoms in man from what they do in animals. Most of the active poisons, however, pro- duce nearly the same effects on all animals. 2. It is objected that it is difficult or impossible, to administer poison to animals in such a state of concentration, as to prevent it from being discharged by vomiting. To obviate this objection, it is directed to make a small opening into the gullet of the ani- mal, having previously detached it from its surrounding con- nexions. All the liquid part is then introduced by a funnel thrust into the opening, and the solid portions made into little pellets are squeezed down. The gullet is then to be tied under the aperture. All this can onlv be done successfully by a prac ticed operator. poisons. 315 3. When the experiment is to be made of the vomited matter or contents of the stomach, it is objected that the poison may have been, either in part or wholly, vomited before hand or ab- sorbed, or transmitted into the intestines, or decomposed by the process of digestion. Or that it may be so much diluted as to have no effect The validity or force to be attached to these ob- jections will, of course, depend upon the circumstances of each particular case. 4. It is objected that animal fluids, secreted during disease, may occasionally act as poisons. Animal fluids are no doubt poisonous when putrid. The introduction of such fluids into an external wound, causes spreading inflammation of the cellular tissue. As to the effect of disease in rendering the contents of the stomach actually poisonous, there is one known fact going to prove it, which certainly demonstrates its possibility. Mor- gagni states, that in the case of a child that died of the tertian ague, an aruginous bile was found in the stomach, of so delete- rious a character, that a little of it given with bread to a cock caused convulsions and death in a few minutes, and that a scal- pel stained with it, and thrust into the flesh of two pigeons, killed them in the same manner. On the whole, this will not be a source of evidence upon which can be placed a very great degree of reliance. It may be useful as a means of testing a suspected substance, and of de- termining whether it possessed poisonous qualities or not. So also it may be resorted to as a means of experimenting on different poisons, but usually, in medico-legal cases. When a sufficient quantity of suspected substance is found to subject to this test, it is also sufficient to subject to other and better tests. 5. Moral circumstances. With these the skilled witness, as such, has nothing to do. There are, nevertheless, not unfrequently things connected with them, that do require his examination and testimony. All that can be necessary, therefore, is to state briefly the circumstances and the occasions where medical aid may be required. 1 . The first circumstance relates to suspicious conduct on the part of the prisoner before the event ; such as dabling with poi- 316 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. sons, conversing about them, and showing a knowledge of their properties. The medical witness may here be called upon to state the extent and accuracy of the knowledge, which the prisoner manifests by his acts and conversation. 2. Another circumstance relates to the purchase or possession of poison, at or about the time of the alleged crime, and the pretence under which it was procured, and whether the pretence turns out to be true or false. 3. The circumstances attending the administration of poison either in food, drink, medicine or otherwise. The great object, in case of any suspected administration, is to ascertain the fact and the intent. Two cases may be found in Dr. Christison, 75, which will serve to illustrate. The one occurred where the poi- son, arsenic, was contained in a bowl of porridge. A past of the meal, from which the pomdge was made, was preserved. Another portion was obtained from the family stores. The for- mer was shown by chemical analysis to contain arsenic, which the latter did not. There were also other circurastaiAces going to show, that the poison must hare been mixed with flie me*d in the morning, before any strange*- entered the houo», The ac- cused was convicted. The other case is cited from Barrael, and in that "he arsenic was found mixed with a large mass of flour, of wli 5 f obtaining octohedral chrystals of arsenious acid. Taylor, 135. Before any step is taken in testing organic fluids, a transparent solution should be obtained. In subjecting these fluids to the test, it is important, first, to destroy the animal matter, to con- centrate the poison, and subsequently, to reduce it. In order to accomplish the first, the nitrate of potash, the nitric acid, and the sulphuric acid may be employed. Arsenic, when really present in the stomach at death, dees not readily disappear afterwards. Many instances have occurred, in which it has been detected in the dead body long after death. In one case, it was found fourteen months after interment ; in another, at the end of three years ; and in another still, after seven years interment. In such cases, it will generally be found attached to the coats of the stomach, in the form of a sesquisul- phuret of arsenic, formed by the union of the arsenious acid, with the sulphuretted hydrogen generated in the process of pu- poisons. 345 ticfaction. It may be collected, dried, and reduced with black flux. Guy's Principles of Forensic Medicine, 596. In relation to the action of arsenic upon the living system, several important points of enquiry present themselves. These are, 1. The quantity required to produce fatal effects : 2. The time within which its effects begin to be developed : 3. The course and character of the symptoms, including the periods of time, within which, it proves fatal : 4. The treatment : 5. The post-mortem appearances. 1 As to the quantity. This, of course, will be found to vary with the strength and power of the constitution to be subdued. In a child four years old, four and a half grains in solution de- stroyed life in six hours. Fifteen grains destroyed the life of a young man of twenty-two years of age in four and a half days. In the case mentioned by Alberti, six grains destroyed the life of a man. Hahnemann says, that, " in circumstances favorable to its action, four grains may cause death within twenty-four hours, and that even one or two grains may prove fatal in a few days. Small quantities have often given rise to very alarming symptoms. So larger quantities, as much as one ounce, have beeD taken, and yet the patient, under the use of sulphate of zinc and magnesia, has recovered. Christison, 275 - 6 ; Guy, 600. 2. The time within which its effects begin to be developed. This is various, depending much upon circumstances. When taken in solution, the effects begin to be manifested much sooner than when administered in the solid state. In a case in which arseniate of potass was taken, the symptoms began violently in fifteen minutes ; where the oxide was mixed in coffee, the effects were manifested immediately on taking the second cup. In anoth- er case, the symptoms began in eight minutes. The assertion, therefore, made by some, that arsenic never begins to operate under half an hour, is a mistake. It may however be admitted, and laid down as a general rule, that this poison, under ordinary circumstances, does not begin to. operate within half an hour body is found, would indicate the accidental character of the event. In 1828, the city of Edinburgh was the scene of excitement, arising from the discovery that two persons, by the names of Burke and Hare / were in the practice of killing individuals by smothering, and then selling their bodies for the purpose of dis- section. The course pursued was, first to intoxicate the victim, and when he was on the floor, one would keep him down by throwing on him the weight of his body, covering the mouth and nose with one hand, applying the other under the chin, thus continuing to hold for ten or twelve minutes, until life was ex- tinct. 2 Beck, 145. In the case of Margery Campbell, the last one of Burke's vic^ tims, the body presented the following appearances ; the exami^ 5J9 450 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. nation having been made two days after death : The joints flac- cid ; features composed, red, and rather more turgid than natu- ral ; lips dark ; conjunctivse of the eyes, even in the horizontal position of the body, much injected with blood ; a little fluid blood on the left cheek, apparently from the nostrils ; tongue not protruded ; the scurf skin under the chin much ruffled, and the surface of the true skin dry and brown when denuded, but with- out blood or surrounding ecchymosis ; the integuments every where free from lividity, except on. the face ; no injury or effu- sion about the wind r pipe or cartilages, but the os hyoides and thyroid cartilage were further apart than usual, in consequence of the stretching of the interposed ligament. The internal or- gans were healthy, and particularly the lungs. The blood throughout the bqdy was black and fluid, and accumulated in the large veins, and in the right cavities of the heart. This mode of death, particularly where opium or alcohol has previously been administered, to stupify and render the system insensible, leaves very few and imperfect traces upon the organi- zation. The rapidity with which, death takes place leaves no opportunity for the accumulation of blood in the venous system. There will be, therefore, no discoloration of skin, no turgescence of veins, no engorgement of pulmonary vessels. 10. Of persons found dead from Cold : Cases of this kind will sometimes arise for medico-legal investigation, but the exposed condition and circumstances under which the body is found ; the season of the year ; the absence of any injuries, or other obvious cause of death, will generally be sufficient to indicate the true cause from which it has proceeded. The effect of a moderate degree of cold is to invigorate the system, but when it becomes intense, it creates a sensation of •numbness and stiffness in the muscles of the limbs and face, accompanied with paleness of the skin. Loss of sensibility, tor- por, and profound sleep follow, all the vital functions gradually, becoming more and more languid, until life entirely ceases. The effect of cold upon the surface, is to contract the capilla- ries of the skin, and thus drive the blood into the internal or- gans. The great vessels of the spleen, liver, lungs, and brain PERSONS FOUND DEAD 451 arc more or less gorged with blood. The nervous system, under the influence of intense cold, gives rise to various phenomena, such as numbness, torpor, somnolency, giddiness, dimness of sight, tetanus, and paralysis. The effects of cold vary much according to the age, strength, and habits of the individual. Of these, the young, the aged, the weak and infirm, and those accustomed to habits of intoxication, are much sooner frozen to death than those possessing firm, vig- orous, healthy constitutions. Some individuals seem to have a peculiar power of resisting cold far beyond others. From the calm, quiet manner in which death generally supervenes, and from the absence of all acute suffering, it seems probable that the principle of vitality is equally diminished in every part, and that the functions of no particular organ are exclusively dis- turbed. It was remarked by the French soldiers in their retreat from Moscow, that those affected by cold, often reeled about as if in a state of intoxication ; that they complained of vertigo and indis- tinctness of vision ; and, under a feeling of lassitude, finally sank into a state of lethargic stupor, from which it was impossible to rouse them. The traces left in the system, by this kind of death, are not very peculiar or well marked. There is paleness of the surface, and general congestion of the internal organs, particularly of the lungs and gastro enteritic mucous membrane. So also there is congestion, but not extravasation, of the vessels of the brain. There has been observed to be serum effused in the ventricles of the brain. The lethargic state has been attributed by some to the greater determination of blood to the brain. 11. Of persons found dead from Burning : The first question that will here naturally arise, regards the accidental or intentional character of the burn. If accidental, it will have occurred during life. If intentional, its occurrence will be after death, the object being to conceal the real cause and mode of death. This directly involves the question whether tht burt,vng took place during life or after deathl The merit of in- 152 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. vestigating and settling this question, appeals t j be due to Di . Christison. The following are the conclusions be arrived at : A burn inflicted during life, presents these appearances, viz : Immediately surrounding the burnt spot, there is a narrow white line; external to this, a second, of a deep red tint; and this lat- ter, at its outer edge, runs by insensible degrees, into a diffused redness. The diffused redness may be removed by gentle pres- sure, and disappears after death. The deep red line, however, is permanent. These appearances are observable in from five to fifteen, and occasionally as late as thirty seconds after the burn. The next appearance, in point of order, is that of blisters filled with serum. The period at which the blisters rise has not been accurately determined, but in most cases, a very few minutes only are required. If, therefore, life is extinct within a few minutes of the injury, blisters may be altogether absent. After scalds, vesications make their appearance in a very few minutes, but in young children it is said that some hours trans- pire before they appear. Vesication" is not an invariable effect of the application of heated bodies. Guy, 495. The Doctor also made experiments testing the effect of fire upon bodies soon after the extinction of life. He was unable at all to produce in such, the deep red line not removable by pres- sure. In some of the experiments, blisters were produced, but there was this material difference between those, and such as were raised during life, the former were filled with air, and the latter with fluid ; and on the removal of the cuticle, the cutis was found free from moisture. In experiments made an hour after death, there were no ap- pearances presented that could be mistaken for vital changes ; all the effect beiDg a ruffling of the cuticle, and a drying up of the parts to which the heated body was applied. From all his experiments, therefore, the deep red line, and the vesicle filled with serum, are to be regarded as vital changes and the results of vital reaction. Another medico legal question that may become important to settle, regards the possibility of spontaneous combustion, human combustion, or the preternatural combustibility of the human body. PERSONS FOUND DEAD. too This, if it occurs at all, is so seldom, that it seems unnecessary to dwell upon it at much length. There are several curious cases on record, that seem, some of them, so well attested, as to incline the belief to their possibility. Orfila has described, par- ticularly, the phenomena attending spontaneous human combus- tion. He says a bright flame appears over the part that is about to be attacked. The flame is not readily extinguished by water, and, indeed, frequently the addition of water only serves to in- crease its activity. Deep eschars form on the part affected, ac- companied by convulsions, delirium, vomiting, and diarrhoea, followed by a peculiar state of putrefaction and death. The pro- cess is said to advance with extreme rapidity, but the body is never entirely consumed. While some parts are half burnt, others are completely incinerated, a carbonaceous, fetid, unctu- ous ash remaining. The hands and feet commonly escape de- struction, while the trunk is usually entirely dissipated. The wooden, or other combustible articles of furniture, situated near the individual, are either uninjured, or but imperfectly con- sumed. The clothes covering the body are commonly destroy- ed. The walls and furniture of the apartment are covered with a thick, greasy soot, and the air is impregnated with an offensive •Mnpyreumatic odor. This phenomenon is stated to have been chiefly observed in corpulent females, advanced in life, and especially in those sub- jects who had been long addicted to the abuse of spirituous liquors. Guy, 497. There seems to be no authenticated case on record, of the oc- currence of spontaneous combustion, that is, of combustion taking place merely from the operation of internal causes. In all the recorded cases, an ignited body has been present, so as to afford a very clear presumption that the fire was communicated to the dress of the individual. That some peculiar circumstances have rendered the human body preternaturally combustible, and that some occasions have occurred when this has been fully demonstrated, seems now to admit of little doubt. What those circumstances are, is not clearly settled. As the subjects to whom this has occurred, have 454 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. been almost, or quite, uniformly addicted to the use of spirituous liquors, it has been urged that an alcoholic impregnation of the body may be sufficient to account for all the phenomena. By others, this seems, with very good reason, to be doubted. The facts that have been observed and recorded, are probably too few in number, as yet, to admit of our coming to any very satis- factory conclusion in regard to the cause or causes of this singular phenomenon. In a late number of the Liverpool Mercury, is a statement of the following singular case : A man noted for his intemperate habits, while drinking with his comrades, laid a wager that he would eat a lighted candle. His bet was taken, and scarcely had he introduced the naming candle into his mouth, when he utter- ed a slight cry and fell powerless to the ground. A bluish flame was seen to flicker about his lips, and on an attempt being made to offer him assistance, the bystanders were horror-struck to find that he was burning internally. At the end of half an hour, his head and part of his chest were reduced to charcoal. 12. Of persons found dead by Lightning : The electric fluid seems to be guided in its direction by the best conductors. Where, in this respect, there is an equality, lofty objects are more likely to be struck than low ones. Hence tho human body, unless under circumstances that create an excep- tion, is likely to escape when surrounded by more elevated ob- jects. As the human body is itself a very good conductor, it is not perfectly safe during a thunder-shower, when in an open space, and at a distance from any other object, as it would then be the most prominent, and the best conductor. Whenever the electric fluid strikes an individual, it produces a shock upon the brain and entire nervous system. It was the opinion of Dr. John Hunter, that it caused the instantaneous and entire destruction of the vital principle in every part of the body,-and as a consequence, produced a great relaxation of the muscles. Where it does not prove immediately fatal, it causes insensibility ; deep, slow and interrupted respiration ; pulse soft and slow, and pupils dilated, but sensible to light. A slight shock produces a stunning effect. PKJRSONS FOUND DEAD 455 The post-mortem appearances exhibit considerable variety. In some cases, no marks of violence will be discovered on the body ; in others, there will be found marks of violence which will be sometimes very severe. More generally, a contused or lacerated wound will be found about the spot where the electric fluid en- tered and passed out. Sometimes an extensive ecchymosis will appear, the more commonly on the back, along the course of the spinal marrow. In cases where the clothes have been set on fire, there may be seen marks of burns, but these will not be produced by the electric fluid. The clothes are very generally torn and singed, giving off a peculiar odor. If there are metal- lic substances about the individual, they will present traces of fusion. The wounds are sometimes of such a character that they re- semble injuries produced by mechanical force, and are liable to be confounded with them. Thty generally present the appear- ance of lacerated punctures, similar to a stab produced by a blunt dagger. In one case, a deep wound was produced in one thigh, almost laying bare the femoral artery. This should induce great caution to avoid mistaking the effects of the electric fluid for vio- lence effected by mechanical means. ' In doubtful circumstances, the situation of the, body and the place where it is first discover- ed, may afford an indication as to the cause of death ; also, the melted state of any metallic substances found about it, together with the rent or torn and burnt condition of the clothes. 13. Of persons found dead from starvation. Death by starvation may be the result of accident or homicide, but very rarely the latter. It has, also, been a means of suicide ; but seldom, unless in case of insanity. When abstinence has been for a long time practiced, there is pain experienced in the epigastrium, which is relieved by pressure ; a general emaciation of the body ; the eyes and cheeks sunken ; the bones projecting ; the face pale and ghastly ; the eyes Wild and glistening ; the breath hot ; the mouth dry and parched ; an intolerable thirst prevails ; delirium ; great prostration of strength ; a fetid odor exhaling from the body ; some of the mucous membranes becom- ing red and inflamed ; and finally death takes place in a fit of 456 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. maniacal delirium, or in horrible convulsions. Guy, 516 ; Taylor, 456. There is considerable difference in the period of time at which death takes place from this cause. It will differ with the age, sex and strength of the individual. It will, also, depend much upon whether free access has been had to liquids during the period of abstinence. It has been ascertained, by experiment, that animals live more than twice as long when they have access to water, as when they are excluded from it. It is said, that where the abstinence was perfect, death would not probably take place under a week or ten days. There are, however, some cases of voluntary starvation on record, in which life has been prolonged for a considerable period of time. In the case of Viterbi, death was protracted to the twenty-first day ; and in the more remarkable case of Guillaume Granet, who resorted to star- vation to avoid punishment, life was prolonged to the fifty-eighth day, when he expired in convulsions. The post-mortem appearances are, great .emaciation of body, and the exhalation from it of a fetid odor. The eyes are found red and open, the skin, mouth and fauces dry, and the stomach and intestines empty and contracted. The gall-bladder is large, and distended with limpid, greenish yellow bile. The heart, lungs and large vessels are collapsed and destitute of blood. The process of putrefaction commences soon after death, and runs its course very rapidly. The post-mortem appearances are hardly sufficient to furnish ' alone clear and satisfactory indications of death from starvation. It is seldom, probably, that the medical jurist will be called upon to decide from these alone, whether death has resulted from that cause or not. When accidental, it is usually coupled with cold or exposure, in which case all the accompanying circumstances will generally afford proof quite sufficient, at least when sustained by the post-mortem appearances. MENTAL ALIENATION. 457 CLASS III. Under this class will be embraced questions arising out of diseases, or affections in the nature of disease, that disqualify ; principally insanity, including all the different forms of mental alienation. This is, probably, the only topic in this class that will require discussion. It is not very material by what name it is called. Its usual appellation has been Insanity ; but that term, according to its true signification, will not cover all the different forms intended to be included under it. Perhaps, the better term to select is mental alienation ; although even that will hardly be deemed broad enough to apply to those diseased affections which, like idiocy, are congenital. MENTAL ALIENATION. What we have to say upon this general subject will be em- braced under the following heads, viz. : 1. Its definition. 2. Its seat. 3. Its history. 4. It's causes. 5. The principle upon which legal exemption proceeds, the division legally recognized, together with the methods of proce- dure known to the law. 6. Its classification ; its different forms ; each being considered m reference to the appearances and proofs that establish it ; and the legal consequences that attach to each. 1. Its definition. To define Insanity, or mental alienation, in such a way as shall cover all its phenomena, and yet be suf- ficiently distinctive, is a matter of extreme difficulty. So widely have definitions varied, that " some," says Dr. Good, " are so narrow as to set at liberty half the patients at Bethlehem or the Bicetre ; and others so loose and capacious, as to give a straight- waistcoat to half the world." The difficulty has generally been 458 MEDICAL JURISPKCDENCE. that definitions have been adopted based only upon some parti- cular forms or phases of the disease, and although true as to them, are untrue as to others. Dr. Reid, for instance, places the seat of the disease in the imagination, and says that " exalted imagination is insanity." John Locke considered madmen as not having lost the reasoning faculty, but that in joining together in- congruous ideas, they mistake them for truths, and err as men do that argue right from wrong principles ; the violence of their imaginations taking their fancies for realities. Dr. Battie defines madness to consist in false perceptions. Dr. Arnold divides the disease into two grand species, one of which he calls notional, and the other ideal insanity. Dr. Criehton defines the disease as con- sisting in general derangement of the mental faculties, in which deceived perceptions are mistaken for realities ; with incoherent language and unruly conduct. Dr. Conolly considers mental de- rangement to consist in the impairment of any one or more facul- ties of the mind, accompanied with, or inducing, a defect in the comparing faculty. Mr. Neville defines it to consist in disordered "function of the brain generally, or of one, or of several of its parts, without consciousness of this derangement on tbe part of the individual affected, and without notable or necessary impli- cation of the functions of any other system in the body. Idiocy, he defines to be deficiency of mental manifestation, from lesion, imperfect development, or absence of one or more of the cerebral organs. Dr. Spurzheim defines insanity to be an aberration of any sensation or intellectual power from the healthy state, with out being able to distinguish the diseased state ; and the aberra tion of any feeling from the state of health, without being able to distinguish it, or without the influence of the will on the actions of the feeling. In other words, the incapacity of distinguishing the diseased functions of the mind, and the irresistibility of our actions, constitute insanity. The last definition is, perhaps, the most elaborate, but is not in all respects true ; as there may be derangement on a particular topic, with the perfect ability to distinguish it from the sounder views of others. Perhaps the definition the least exceptionable is that suggested by Dr. Spurz- heim, viz. : An aberration of the manifestations of the mind from MENTAL ALIENATION. 459 their ordinary, normal, healthy stale. This, it is true, is very genera], little distinctive, and cannot be said to cover all its forms, •is the term aberration can hardly be applied to those diseased affections which, like idiocy, are congenital. Still, as the defini- tion is plain and obvious ; has a direct reference to the mental character of the disease ; and really embraces the great fact which in any given case always presents itself as a distinct subject of inquiry, viz.- : The nature and extent of change which has taken place in the action of the faculties composing the mind, in refer- ence to which the enquiry is made, we shall adopt it. 2. Its seat. This, in reference to its bearings on medical juris- prudence, is not very material to be considered. It must either be seated in the mental faculties themselves, and thus be a dis- ease of the spiritual nature ; or in the brain, the material organ, through which the mind here displays itself. We suppose its seat to be the latter, for the following briefly alleged reasons. 1. It is more reasonable in itself than the supposition of a diseased soul ; because, if the latter be diseased, we can perceive nothing in the nature of death to divest it of that disease ; and, also because, as far as our experience goes, whatever is subject to disease is also subject to death. 2. It is in harmony with all other diseased affections, as they all proceed from suffering organs. 3. It is quite obvious from an investigation of some of the causes. Idiocy, for instance, may result from defective develop- ment of brain, or from structural derangement. Blows, or other injuries affecting the brain, may result in mental alienation. 4. From the physical phenomena attending it, is drawn an ar- gument. The increased pulsation, the furred tongue, the consti- pation of the bowels, the peculiar caste of countenance, and the preternatural heat, sometimes observable, either of the whole brain or of some one particular part of it, are all indicative of physical disease. 5. The morbid phenomena, or pathological changes, sometimes discoverable in the brains of those who have been afflicted with mental alienation. These, it is true, are not always such obvious lesions as are perceptible on dissection. The brain is an ex- 460 .MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. tremely delicate organ, and it is not every kind of irritation that will leave its traces there after death. Some pathological changes may exist, without becoming the objects of the senses. Where- ever the alienation has been long continued and severe, and the death has finally resulted from it, there will be likely to be such lesions occurring in the brain as will be obvious on dissection. But, although a disease of the material organ, yet the symp- toms disclosing it to the medical jurist, consist in the defective, deranged, or perverted action and manifestation of the faculty or faculties of the mind. 3. Its history. There are fewer pages in the history of human progress more marked or peculiar, than those on which are re- corded the varying views of men in reference to mental aliena- tion. It was once looked upon' as a special judgment from God; as beyond the reach of remedies ; as an infliction that would justly warrant barbarity and savageness of treatment, and right- fully exclude its suffering subject from all the privileges of so- cial intercourse, and all sympathy with human feelings. Hence, chains, and imprisonment, and darkness, and dungeons, with the infliction frequently of horrid cruelties, have, in times past, been the almost invariable lot of those whose only crime was the loss of their reason. It is shocking to know that men could ever be led to commit such horrid enormities. Nor have their views, or their conduct, been changed until within the last half century. The early part of the nineteenth century was signalized by the strong efforts of Pinel in France, to impress upon the mind ot man different views in relation to mental alienation, and more especially to the conduct to be pursued towards the insane. He knocked the chains from his swollen limbs, gave Mm free access to the atmosphere and to light, and showed that he reposed con- fidence in himas a moral being. The result was successful be- yond all measurable calculation. The world owes a debt of gratitude to Pinel, which it will never find it in its power to re- pay. He had the moral courage to stand up against the public opinion of his fellow-men, and the raving of the maniac, and in the face of both to proclaim and enforce the truth. Since his time, public opinion has essentially changed. This terrible in- MIINTAL ALIENATION. 4C1 friction is now mourned as a misfortune, instead of being visited as a crime. It is no more regarded as furnishing just matter of reproach, than the bereavement of motion in a paralyzed muscle. The sounder views that have been entertained in reference to mind, both in its normal and abnormal action, have also resulted in more clearly understanding the deranged or diseased condi- tions to which it is occasionally subject. 4. Its causes. With these, the mere medical jurist has little concern. A very brief allusion, therefore, will only be made to them. The brain is the centre of many distinct and differing rela- tions. Of these there are at least three different kinds : 1. The first set of relations are those which it sustains with the different organs in the organism in which it is found. It supplies to these the nervous power or energy, and derives from, them that which contributes to its growth and continued support. Hence a system of mutual and reciprocal influences exists between the brain and every other important organ in the animal economy. These may be termed organic relations. 2. The brain is the great sensitive centre. Between it, there- fore, and external nature, exist the relations of sensation. In virtue of these, the objects in the material world make their im pressions, and are recognized as pleasant or painful. These are the physical relations. 3. In the brain are the organs of thought, reflection, emotion, volition ; all, in fine, that goes to constitute the mind. Here, then, is the source of the higher relations, those existing be- tween it and the unseen, spiritual world. It is in virtue of these that man becomes a being of, reason, and a subject of God's moral government. These may be termed the moral relations. It is proper to premise here, that we know little or nothing of the essence of mind. Our knowledge of it is derived from what we are conscious of in ourselves, and from what we observe of its sane and deranged action in others. From all we are able to glean from these two sources of knowledge, we are not disposed to regard the mind as a unit, or single general power, capable, originally, of acting with equal energy in every direction or dis- 462 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. tinct department, to which its operations might extend; but rather as a congeries, or assemblage of faculties, connected to- gether by a common consciousness, and by modes of activity en- joyed by all those which possess the same general character. These faculties are so many powers or instruments of thought or of feeling, of a definite nature, and having specific functions. In virtue of that nature and of those functions, each is indepen- dent of every other ; may act or rest singly ; be strong or weak ; sane or deranged in its manifestations. Upon this principle only is mental alienation intelligible ; and hence its general assumption by the most approved writers upon that subject. The causes of mental alienation are in accordance with the three systems of relations just enumerated. They are organic, physical, and moral. 1. The organic, or, as they have been termed, sympathetic causes, are to be found in the relations existing between the brain and other large organs of the body. The existence of these admits of the transference of disease from other organs to this. Thus erysipelas, gout, rheumatism, and repelled cutaneous affections, may be productive of mental alienation. More espe- cially will suppressed lochia, menses, milk in nurses, hsemo- rhoides, old drains dried up, as setons, issues, &c, result in de- rangement. Sometimes general diseases, such as small pox, measles, scarlatina, and fevers of various sorts, affect the whole body, but occasionally they are productive of morbid changes in the brain, resulting in mental alienation. 2. The physical causes of mental alienation may arise either, 1 . From defective development, or derangement of structure of the brain, from the operation of internal causes. From the first may result idiocy, and from the second, hydrocephalus imer- nus. Or it may arise, 2. From external violence, or from the action of local causes expending their hurtful influence upon the brain. A severe blow on the head may entirely suspend all mental action ; a fracture of the skull and wound of the brain, may give rise to acute in- flammation, to delirium, and sometimes to more permanent men- MENTAL ALIENATION. 463 tal derangement. Intense cold may derange the operations of the mind. Baron Larry states that in the retreat of the French army from Moscow, many cases of insanity, in every variety of form, accompanied by a great number of deaths, were produced by the continued action of the intense cold upon the brain. So also great heat may derange the health of the brain, and give rise to mental alienation. If the uncovered head be long exposed to the direct rays of the sun, a severe and long continued paroxysm of mania may be the result. It may also give rise to more acute cerebral disease, accompanied, or in part manifested, by violent delirium. Thus it must be apparent, that the physical causes of mental alienation are very numerous. 3. The moral causes are probably the most fruitful in the pro- duction of all the forms of mental alienation. There may be two distinct modes in which these causes may operate : 1 . One or more of the mental faculties may be possessed of such inordinate, disproportional strength, as that by its own in- herent activity, it may be pushed into an abnormal state or con- dition : 2. One or more faculties possessing less comparative strength, may, in consequence of their union with others, be urged on to an intenser degree of action than they are able to endure, and thus become deranged in their manifestations. The attainment of wealth, honor, power,' furnish to some the strongest possible inducements, and lash up those faculties that are the most in- strumental in procuring them to their highest possible degree of action : And then all the sentiments and emotions, hope and fear, joy and sorrow, are in unremitted activity, and often at the extremest degree of tension. Losses, failures, unfortunate oc- currences, strike with a force severe in proportion to the antici- pated success. Whatever stirs deep emotion, or excites to in- tense and continuous thought, may be productive of excessive and irregular action. These causes, operating upon the patient, have been known to affect even the unborn child. Esquirol has observed that during the agitated periods of the French re- volution, many ladies then pregnant, and whose minds were kep J 46 1 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. constantly on the stretch by the anxiety and alarm inseparable from the epoch in which they lived, and whose nervous sys- tems were thereby rendered irritable in the highest degree com- patible with sanity, were afterwards delivered of children whose brains and nervous systems had been similarly affected by the state of the parent, to such a degree, .that, in future life, as chil- dren, they were subject to spasms, convulsions, and other ner- vous affections; and in youth, to madness, imbecility, or de- mentia, almost without any exciting cause. He relates one instance of a pregnant woman being terrified by the threats of her husband when intoxicated, and the child, after its birth, was so much affected by its mother's agitation, that it continued subject to panic terrors until the age of eighteen , and then became completely maniacal. Combe's Insanity, 98-9 It is principally from these causes that an advanced civiliza tion is so productive of the different forms of mania. It carries in its train so much that contributes to the excessive excitement of the different faculties, and that which administers to the mor- bid growth of some, that much insane manifestation is the in- evitable result. Among the savage tribes of men on this conti- nent, insanity was unknown. It has followed in the wake of civilization, and seems to prevail the most extensively where there is the largest liberty of thought, speech, and action. In Great Britain it abounds much more than on the continent, and in England it is more frequently to be met with than in other ' parts of Great Britain. Spurzheim's Insanity, 123. In the United States it is probably much more frequently to be found in proportion to the population, than among any other people. The exciting scenes of our politics, the deep and ab- sorbing interest that sometimes attaches to religious revivals, the rage for pecuniary speculation that occasionally seizes upon a whole community, are all in themselves peculiarly well fitted to impart intense activity to those moral causes that dethrone the reason, and subvert the laws of mind. 5. The principle upon which legal exemption proceeds, the division legally recognized, together with the methods of pro- cedure known to the law. MENTAL ALIENATION. 465 Law is understood to mean " a rule of civil action, prescribed by the supreme power in the state, commanding what is right, and prohibiting what is wrong." The rule of civil action thus prescribed is specific, and has its own appropriate sanctions, consisting in the rewards offered to the obedient, and the punish- ments inflicted upon the disobedient. In order, however, that any law should be binding, two conditions are essential ; the one is, that the being who is the subject of it, should possess suffi- cient mental capacity to understand the rule and comprehend the consequences of its violation ; and the other is, that super- added to that capacity, he should be a free moral agent, the mas- ter of his own actions, and capable of proceeding upon motives common to the race to which he belongs. All, then, on the one hand, in any civilized community, who are sunk so low in intel- ligence and comprehension as that the rule and its sanctions are beyond their reach, should be visited only for the purposes of protection against the injurious acts of others ; and all those on the other, who by reason of delusion or halucination, or from perversion of the intellectual or moral powers, are unable to act upon commonly received motives, or who have ceased to be mas- ters of their own actions, should be visited also for the purpose of protection ; but very frequently it would be required to be a protection of the community against them. Thus the principle of legal exemption is derived from the moral nature of the law itself; it being as manifestly absurd and irrational to punish either one of these classes for disobedience, as it would be to punish a mere machine, either because it would not go at all, or because when it did go, it went all wrong. The jurisprudence of all civilized nations has never failed to recognize these two great classes of human beings who are de- prived of their reason. The Roman law divided the insane, or dementes, as they were termed, into two classes. In the one was included all the mente capti, or those whose understanding was weak or null ; and in the other, all the furiosi, or those who were restless and furious. The French and Prussian codes make use of the terms demence, fureur and imbecilite, without undertaking to define them. 30 466 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. The English common law originally recognized but two forms of mental alienation, and these were termed idiocy and lunacy. An idiot was legally defined by Fitzherbert, at a very early period, to be a person who cannot count or number twenty pence, nor tell who was his father or mother, nor how old he is, or that hath no understanding or reason — what shall be for his profit, or what for his loss : but if he have such understanding that he knows and understands his letters, and to read by teaching i or information of another man, then it seems he is not an idiot, which seems more properly to belong to one who has had no un- derstanding from his birth, and is, therefore, by law, presumed never likely to attain any. Fitz. N. B., 583, ed. 1652. This de- finition the medical profession, and probably the legal also, would now consider altogether too restrictive for the term idiot, as there are some degrees of idiocy much in advance of those necessarily embraced in this definition.. Lunacy was derived from the term luna, the moon, and was so called from the supposed influence which the moon exerted, or was presumed to exert, over the disorder. This term signifies in its legal acceptation, one who has had understanding, but, by disease, grief, or other accident, hath lost the use of his reason. A lunatic is properly one that hath had lucid intervals, sometimes enjoying his senses and sometimes not. 4 Coke, 123 ; 1 Black. Com., 304. At. a very early period a general term was sought, under which might be included all the possible forms of mental alienation. For this purpose the term non compos mentis was adopted, and it was used to signify a person " out of his senses." The English phrase equivalent to it is " of unsound mind," which was once understood to import a total deprivation of sense./ After thus including under one generic term all cases of de- ranged mind, an effort was made by Lord Coke to define the dif- ferent classes that are included under it. He divides them into four classes : 1. Idiot, or fool natural, who from his nativity by a perpetual infirmity is non compos mentis : 2. A person who was of good and sound memory, but by sick- MENTAL ALIENATION. 467 ness, grief, or other accident, wholly loses his memory, and un- derstanding : 3. A lunatic — lunaticus, who has sometimes his understanding and sometimes not ; qui guadet lucidis intervallis, and, therefore, he is called non compos mentis so long as he has not understand- ing: 4. A person who by his own vicious act, for a time deprives himself of his memory and understanding, as he that is drunken ; but such a person has no privilege by this voluntary contracted madness. Co. Litt., 247, a; 4 Bl. Com., 25 ; Shelford on Lunacy, 1-2. The law interferes on three different occasions to afford relief to the non compos mentis : 1. On the occasion of their general action while in that state and condition. The object and effect of this interference is to establish the general fact of unsoundness of mind, upon the well ascertained proof of which, they are deprived of all control over their property 5 divested of their civil rights in relation to their estates ; absolved from all duties ; and protected against the in- jurious acts of others. This has reference to the future : 2. On the occasion of a single act done, as a contract made, property conveyed, or any thing of that kind transacted ; the object of which is, to avoid the act as done by a mind deranged, and therefore incompetent to its performance. This has reference to the past, and not the future : 3. On the occasion of a criminal act done, as the taking, with- out consent, the property of others ; the commission of incendi- arism ; or the taking away of life. The object of interference here is to exonerate the non compos from the legal consequences of an act, in others criminal., but in him innocent, on account of the malady under which he labors. This also has reference to the past. The first is accomplished by the issuing, execution, and return to a commission. The second, by the trial of an issue upon the very act sought to be avoided ; and the third, by his triai upon the commission of an alleged crime, in which his sanity or in- sanity is tested in reference to such commission. 4GS MEDICAX JURISPRUDENCE. Originally commissions were issued for the purpose of enquir- ing whether the individual was an idiot ex nativitate, or a luna- tic, and in consequence thereof, incapable of governing himself and managing his worldly affairs. The finding in the one case had a different consequence attached to it from what it had in the other. An idiot ex nativitate, having been such from his birth, was legally presumed to remain so through life, while a lunatic, having once had the possession of his reason, was pre- sumed capable of again regaining it. Hence the commission might be superceded in the latter case, and the individual on his recovery, be restored to his rights and property, but not in the former. In the former case, it is usual to state in the inqui- sition the period of time during which the person under exami- nation has been a lunatic or of unsound mind, but not in the latter, although if stated, it is regarded as surplusage and does not vitiate. In England the jurisdiction over all cases of idiocy, lunacy and unsoundness of mind, has been exercised by the lord chancellor, not, however, acting as the court of chancery, but under a special separate commission from the crown, authorising him to take care of the property, and for the benefit of the lunatic. . The care and custody both of the idiot and lunatic, and their estates respectively, originally belonged to the king alone. Shelford en Lunacy, 10 ; ex parte Phillips, 19 Vesey, 122. Anciently the king could grant the care of an idiot's person, and the profits of his estate during his lite, without account, except for necessaries; but since the revolution, the crown has always granted the sur- plus to some of his family, note c in 1 Paris fy Fonllanque, 290. In New- York, the Revised Statutes, 2 R. S., 52, §1, provide that the chancellor shall have the care and custody of all idiots, lunatics, persons of unsound mind, and persons who shall be in- capable of conducting their own affairs in consequence of habitual drunkenness ; and also of their estates whether real or personal. In consequence of the recent abolition of the court of chancery, the same power and jurisdiction devolved upon the supreme court. The method by which it is ascertained whether any one is a MENTAL ALIENATION. 469 fit subject for the exercise of this power and jurisdiction, both in England and in this country, is by the issuing of a commission, and the proceedings based upon it. "When persons non compotes mentes became divided into the two classes of idiots and lunatics, distinct commissions in the nature of the old writs were framed for each of them ; one de , idiota inquirendo, and the other de lunatico inquirendo. Shelford on Lunacy, 52. After the general term unsoundness of mind came into more general use, and as it was sometimes difficult to deter- mine in advance whether the examination would result in show- ing idiocy or lunacy, the commission took a different style, and was called a commission in the nature of a writ de lunatico inquir- endo. The general method pursued, both in England and in this country, in the issuing of the commission, and the proceedings under it, is much the same. The following is a brief summary of the method of procedure. A petition is presented to the chan- cellor, or, in this state, to the supreme court, by some near rela- tive of the alleged lunatic, accompanied by affidavits setting forth the facts on which the application is founded. The application is ex parte. If a case is made out sufficient to justify or require the interference of the law, a commission now generally styled in the nature of a writ de lunatico inquirendo, is issued, directed to a certain number of commissioners, generally three, who are named therein, and who are required to execute the commission. This must be done by means of a jury, consisting of at least twelve disinterested men, who are to meet for that purpose hear the place of abode of the supposed lunatic. In the execution of the commission, the commissioners constitute the court, and as such, lay down the law to the jury, to whom it belongs, as in all other cases where their aid is invoked, to find the facts that are submitted to them. The alleged lunatic must have due notice both of the time and place of executing the commission, so that he can, if he desires, appear and contest the finding of the jury. Witnesses may be sworn, and the trial proceed as in ordinary cases, except that the cause must be submitted to the jury with- out the arguments of counsel. The jury either disagree and are 470 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. discharged, or agree upon the verdict embraced in the inquisition, which is intended to be the answer to the commission, and to furnish a full and precise response to all the enquiries contained in it. The legal questions that have generally arisen have had refer- ence either to the form and contents of the commission, or to the inquisition which furnishes the response to it. One great point in controversy has been, how far relief can legitimately extend in cases of alleged unsoundness of mind and incapacity to con- duct the ordinary affairs of life. This point first distinctly arose in the case ex parte Barnsley, ZAtk,, 168, in which on a commis- sion to inquire whether Barnsley was a lunatic, the inquisition found that from weakness of mind he was incapable of governing himself or his estate. This case was elaborately discussed, and Lord Hardwicke finally quashed the inquisition for insufficiency, holding that the finding must be that he was a lunatic, or, what was correspondent to it, that he was of an unsound mind. It was not sufficient in his judgment that he was weak and worn out with age, and incapable of managing his estate; The same doctrine was subsequently declared in Lord DonegaPs case, 2 Vesey, 407. The first departure from the strict technical rules laid down by Lord Hardwicke relative to these commissions is in 6 Vesey, 273 ; where Lord Eldon lays down the principle, that evidence may support a commission not of lunacy, but in the nature of a writ de lunatico inquirendo, in which he says it must be remem- bered, that it is not necessary to establish lunacy ; but it is suf- ficient tltat the party is incapable of managing his own affairs. In the case of Ridgeway vs. Darwin, 8 Vesey, 65, the subject under- went a still further investigation, and in ex parte Cranmer, 12 Vesey, 4A5, Lord Erskine distinctly held that the jurisdiction of the chancellor embraced cases of imbecility resulting from old age, sickness, or other causes. The question he said was whether the party had become mentally incapable of managing his affairs. Previous to this, Lord Eldon had held that on the execution of a commission it was not necessary to establish lunacy, but that it was sufficient if the party was shown to be incapable of managing MENTAL ALIENATION. 471 his own affairs. In all these cases, however, it was deemed ne- sgssary, in order to support the commission, that the jury should find the fact of unsoundness of mind, which Lord Hardwicke un- derstood as correspondent with lunatic, and which Lord Eldon denned to be " such a state of mind as to be contradistinguished from idiocy, and also from lunacy, and yet such as made one a proper object of a commission in the nature of a commission to inquire of idiocy or lunacy." This point came up for investigation and decision in the courts of New-York, in the matter of Barker, 2 Johnson's Chan. Rep., 232, in which Chancellor Kent gave a somewhat elaborate opinion, sustaining the commission where the inquisition found the party an old man of eighty-five years of age, to be of " unsound mind and mentally incapable of managing his affairs." In the matter of Wendell, 1 John. Chan. Rep., 600, the same chancellor directed an issue to be made and settled to try the question, whether Wendell " be a lunatic or mentally incapable of managing his own affairs," thus clearly indicating, by placing these terms in the alternative, that he considered the one as equivalent to the other. In the matter of Mason, 1 Barbour's Supreme Court Reports, 436, the sufficiency of a commission came up for adjudication, in which the inquisition simply found that the party was " so far weakened and impaired in the faculties of his mind, as to be mentally incapable of the government of himself, and of the man- agement of his goods and chattels, lands and affairs," without finding any unsoundness of mind. The subject is ably discussed by Harris, J., in which he sustains the commission and inquisi- tion, suggesting as a reason why a stricter technicality is insisted upon in England than in this country in reference to commis- sions of this character is, that there the inquisition on its return may be traversed by the party returned a lunatic or of unsound mind, and hence the necessity of certainty in the form of the finding ; and as the right of traverse does not here exist, there can be no necessity of any strictness of form. This decision places the jurisprudence of this state in reference to these commissions on a proper foundation. It does away with the useless distinction between a mind that is incompetent for 472 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. the transaction of business through unsoundness, and one equally incompetent through age and the decay of its faculties. Prior to this decision, no one could realize the protection he required, without being judicially branded with mental alienation, which in reference to himself and more especially his descendants, was a thing extremely painful to submit to. Now, no imputation of that kind is necessarily incurred, as the mere decay of the facul- ties which is so frequently incident to old age, is alone sufficient to warrant legal interference, and the extension of that protection so necessary under the circumstances of the case. In relation to the investigation of a civil or criminal act done by a person alleged to be mentally alienated, there is no peculiar method to be observed in conducting the trial, and, therefore, nothing necessary need be said here in reference to it. 6. Its classification, its different forms, each being considered in reference to the appearances and proofs that establish it, and the legal consequences to which it is subject. The classification which appears to be the least objectionable, and which is essentially that adopted by Dr. Guy and Dr. Ray, is the following, thrown into a tabular form : o From defective development, 'Congenital, or "1 occurring in > childhood. J Amentia, (1. Idiocy. (_2. Imbecility. < w diminished activity of the faculties. Occurring' sub- ] sequent to the l development of f the faculties. J Dementia f 1. Consequent on mania, J mental shocks, or iuju- | riesofthe brain. 12. Senile. < H K From deranged, ex- cessive action, or undue excitement of the faculties, ! { Mania, (1. General, 2. In.eUecma^ ™ [ 3 .Mo ra >, (l;Ge S . This method of classifying, it will be perceived, is psychologi- cal, not physiological. It is founded on the deviations from the normal state, observable in the faculties themselves, and not in the brain. This is the view which is proper, if not essen- tial, to be taken in reference to medical jur'sprudence ; while, in a mere medical point of view, reference should be had to the diseased organ. One great division, it will be perceived, em MENTAL ALIENATION 173 braces all those cases which occur in consequence of a preter- natural defect in the development, or a greatly diminished activity of the faculties. One branch of this division is congeni- tal, embracing Idiocy. To this, the law has given various definitions ; as, that an idiot is of non-sane memory, a nativitate, as one who from his nativity, by a perpetual infirmity, is non compos mentis, as one who has no understanding from his nativity. Again, that he is such a person who cannot count and number twenty, and tell who was his father or mother, nor how old he is, so that it may appear that he hath no understanding of reason what shall be for his profit, or what for his loss. Again, it is stated, if he be able to beget either son or daughter, he is no fool natural. The difficulty seems to be, that the law attempts to give too rigorous a definition, not seeming to concede that idiocy admits of degrees, which every one knows to be the fact. Idiocy may be defined to be " that condition of mind in which the reflective, and all, or part, of the affective powers are either entirely wanting, or are manifested to the slightest possible ex- tent." Ray's Medical Jurisprudence of Insanity, C9, § 37. This condition may be recognized and known, 1. By the size of head. The brain is generally much below the usual size. The deficiency is more particularly noticeable in the anterior lobes. The circumference over the obitar arch and most prominent part of the occipital bone, is put down at between eleven and one-third and fourteen and one-half inches, about equaling that of a new-born infant. The convolutions of the brain, particularly in the anterior part, are less thick, less deep, and often less numerous. Besides a great depression of the forehead, there is usually a flattening of the sides, the head being frequently grotesquely shaped. Pinel and Esquirol mention one who re- sembled a sheep in her inclinations, manner of action, as well as in the shape of her head. Pritchard on Insanity, 210. In the form of head there is observable about as much variety as in that of adults. 2. In the features there is much irregularity. The forehead low ; the eyes deeply set, small, often squinting, meaningless and 474 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. objectless ; the lips thick, mouth large, open and gaping ; gums spongy ; teeth imperfect ; limbs ill-formed, crooked and defective in their motions. 3. There is great imperfection in the senses. They are dull, or altogether wanting. The sight and hearing are often defec- tive ; the smell and taste so much so, as to make it entirely im- material what food they subsist upon. They are short-lived, seldom living beyond the twenty-fifth year. They have little, if any, use of articulate speech. There is some variety in the power of mental manifestation by idiots. While some are sunk below the brute creation, in the scale of animal existence, there are others that display faint glim- merings of intelligence. They are the most uniform in mani- festing some or all the propensities. Of these, that which seems to be the most commonly possessed is the sexual propensity. They are, also, sometimes cunning, combative and destructive. Although some of them arise to the possession of the power of perceiving, and hence of becoming acquainted with surrounding objects, their nature and qualities, yet they seem uniformly to lack the power of reflection. They are unable even to compare two ideas together. Sometimes, they are found to possess some of the moral sentiments, as self-esteem, love of approbation, religi- ous veneration, and benevolence. Dr. Rush speaks of one who was remarkable for kindness and affection, and even spent his life in acts of benevolence, though he showed no one mark of reason. Others have showed inclination for religious worship. Some can recollect names, numbers, or 'historical facts, and repeat them mechanically ; but have no power of combining them. Others are able to sing a few airs, and even 'to play on musical instruments. Idiotism is more frequently met with in mountainous, than in \. plain districts of country. There is a form of it, termed cretin- _ ism, endemic in the Vallais, among the Alps of Switzerland, and in some other mountainous countries. There are three classes, viz. : cretinism, semi-cretinism, and cretinism of the third degree. In the first, life is little more than automatic. In the second, there exists the powor of bestowing a slight attention upon sur MENTAL ALIENATION. 475 rounding objects ; of remembering simple events, and of using language to express their common wants. In the third, there is a higher degree of intellect ; a stronger power of recollecting events ; a capacity to learn even reading and writing, but with- out any adequate conception of their purposes. Some can even learn music, drawing, painting, and machinery ; while others have attempted poetry, succeeding, however, in nothing but the rhyme. It is unnecessary to consider separately the legal consequences of idiocy : so far as they are peculiar to that state, they will be noticed hereafter. Imbecility. This is defined to be " an abnormal deficiency, either in those faculties which acquaint us with the qualities and ordinary relations of things, or in those which furnish us with the moral motives that regulate our relationsand conduct towards our fellow-men ; and frequently attended with excessive activity of one or more of the animal propensities." Ray's Medical Juris- prudence of Insanity, 74, § 41. There are two somewhat important particulars in which this state or condition is distinguishable from that which immediately preceded it. The first is, that it is not congenital, but occurs subsequent to birth ; although in it the development of the moral and intellectual powers is arrested at a very early period of ex- istence. The second is, that there is a higher decree of intelli- gence, and more moral power possessed by the imbecile than the idiot. In regard to the legal responsibility and liability of the former, there often occur vexed and difiicult questions, but never as to the latter. It becomes, therefore, important that this state or condition of mind should be well understood. While in idiocy reason was never enthroned, and articulate speech rarely made use of, in imbecility there is possessed some intellectual and moral capacity, and some use, though a limited one, of speech. The imbecile is generally susceptible of some degree of educa- tion. He can rise to the comprehension of a few simple ideas. He is capable, under some circumstances, of making some pro- gress in reading, writing, arithmetic, music, and the mechanic arts. There seems, however, to be an impassible barrier in the 476 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. way of their attaining that degree of knowledge and practical skill which those, in other respects, of their own station in life generally attain. In their character, both moral and intellectual, there is observable the same kind of variety as that which pre- vails among sound minds. While, for instance, some are fickle and changeable, others exhibit great firmness, and even obstinacy, in their pursuits. Some are capable, assisted by the occasional advice of others, of managing their property, and of attending to some of the simpler business pursuits. They are often capable of conversing ordinarily well on such every day matters as are constantly brought before their minds ; but are utterly incapable of argument, or of carrying out a well sustained conversation. They are, in general, thoughtless, improvident, timid and way- ward ; incapable of strong attachment ; strangers to the higher sentiments ; are uneasy, and manifest a constant restlessness of disposition. The German writer, Hoflf bauer, has endeavored to systematize imbecility, and to define and mark out, by precise limits, the different degrees of which it is ■ susceptible. He first distin- guishes the two forms under which it is manifested. The one, he styles imbecility or silliness; the other, dullness or stupidity. The first, he supposes, arises from a defect of the intensity, or power of the mind to examine the data presented to it by the senses, corresponding to a defect in reflective power. The last flows from a defect in the extensity, or power by which the mind is enabled to perceive and embrace all the data furnished from without; clearly corresponding to a defect in the perceptive power. The great distinction between the two, in reference to the faculty of judgment is, that while the imbecile can, with great difficulty, arrive at any conclusions at all, the stupid can with greater facility, arrive at them, but is the most liable of the two to be erroneous. This error arises, not from judging erroneously in regard to these subjects to which his attention has been di- rected, but from his neglect of some considerations which ought to have formed the ground work of his judgment. The imbecile, on the contrary, finds it difficult to arrive at the most simple MENTAL ALIENA'lION. 477 act of judgment. The stupid will more readily correct his mis- takes, on the suggestion of the circumstance which has led to it ; while the imbecile is unable to concentrate his attention suffici- ently on any particular subject to enable him to do it. Weak- ness of intellect is displayed in both ; and when the defect is well marked, it is displayed in the same manner, viz., by a pro- pensity to talk to themselves. The stupid is much more apt than the imbecile to imagine himself equal, if not superior, to other men in intelligence. He acts precipitately, and without reflection ; while the imbecile can hardly bring himself to act at all. He has assigned to imbecility five gradations or degrees, and to stupidity three, which he has done for the purpose of facilitating the application to them of legal principles. In the first degree of imbecility, there exists the inability to form a judgment respecting any new object, when the proper data are furnished, and the question not one of difficulty. When called upon to judge in reference to objects with which he is daily familiar, he is found to exercise a tolerably correct judg- ment. He is subject to sudden gusts of passion, which are as easily appeased as they are easily excited. The second degree applies also to dementia, hereafter to be considered. The third degree unfits for all matters requiring more than a mechanical mode of action. There is found in this degree a con- sciousness of weakness and inferiority. His memory is defective, as ideas have made no strong impression on his mind. He has a great propensity to pass rapidly from one subject to another : is irritable and suspicious in reference to the designs and inten- tions of those around him. In the fourth degree there is a clouded state of the understand- ing and memory ; great insensibility, but a confused idea of his weakness. The fifth degree corresponds to the last stage of dementia, or the fatuity which is the result of some cerebral disease. In stupidity, the first degree only incapacitates when it be- comes necessary, in judging, to weigh opposing motives. 478 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. In the second degree he is embarrassed in any train of reason ing. His memory is slow, but his judgment may still be accu- rate in reference to things by which he is habitually surrounded, although he is incapable of exerting any vigor of judgmet. In the third and highest degree, the individual is incapable of going beyond a single idea; and must completely lose that one, before he can pass to another. As judgment is always based more or less upon a comparison of ideas, it will be perceived that this degree renders the individual more incapable of exer- cising this faculty than the imbecile. The classification, thus briefly alluded to, certainly has its merits, and^may be useful in its practical application. It will be perceived, however, that it has reference solely to man's intel- lectual nature, afibrding no guide whatever to determine the ex- tent of imbecility when it happens to occur in the moral nature. The French writer Georget has, to some extent, supplied this deficiency ; his large experience enabling him td do that with great correctness. He remarks that in hospitals for the insane, there is always a certain number of imbeciles who do the coarse work of the house, or serve as domestics and assistants to the regular officers. They are sufficiently intelligent to perform their duties, sweep the courts, carry burdens, move machines, execute some com- missions, know the use of money, and procure various enjoy- ments. They have a very imperfect idea, if any, of society, laws, morality, courts and trials ; and though, they may have the idea of property, yet they have no conception of the conse-, quences of theft. Although they may have been taught to re- frain from injuring others, yet they are ignorant of what would be done to them if guilty of incendiarism or. murder. Theft is extremely common both among imbeciles and idiots, and one great reason is, that some of them have no conception of pro- perty, nor of the distinctions of meum and tuum. When capable of experiencing the sentiment of fear, they are solely actuated by the dread of punishment, and by their own desires. Others have some notions of property, but neither a sense of morality, nor a fear of punishment, furnish motives sufficiently powerful to pre MENTAL ALIENATION. 479 vent them from stealing. The sentiment of cunning, too, may be very much developed, while the other faculties are more or less deficient. Among the lower orders of society are many imbeciles a little more intelligent than these, and not considered as utterly devoid of understanding, who, nevertheless, have but vague and imper- fect notions of social duties, and of justice. They engage in occupations that require no great extent of intellect, and even in the simplest of the mechanic arts. If they do not pass among their acquaintances for imbeciles, they are at best regarded as singular beings, with feeble understandings, and are teased and tormented in innumerable ways. Many of them, for want of some powerful restraining motive, indulge in drinking, and be- come lazy, drunken and dissipated, and finally fall into the hands of justice in greater numbers than is generally suspected- They steal adroitly, and hence are considered as very intelligent; they recommence their offences the moment they are released from con- finement, and thus are believed to be obstinately perverse ; they are violent and passionate, and the slightest motive is sufiicient to plunge them into deeds of incendiarism and murder. Those who have strong sexual propensities, soon become guilty of outrages on female chastity. I have had occasion, says Georget, to see many examples of this class in prisons, who had been judicially decided to be ra- tional, but whose demi- imbecility was manifest enough to me. Ray's Medical Jurisprudence of Insanity , 82-3. The character of the imbecility has generally been supposed to be sought only in the intellect. By means of this deficiency, they have been found to lack depth in thought and reasoning. They have failed to perceive the remoter relations, and higher purposes of things. They lack the power of forecast, and are beings of the present rather than the future. They seem in- capable of adopting any settled plan or purpose, and are with- out any definite, final aim or object in their efforts. Imbecility may as well attach to the moral as the intellectual faculties of man. The remarks of Georget just cited, bear di- rectly upon that point. 480 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. Dr. Ray, page 84-5, cites the case of one E. S., as one in which there was the greatest difficulty in drawing the line be- tween extreme moral depravity and insanity, and in deciding at what point an individual should cease to be considered as a re- sponsible moral agent, and amenable to the laws. He was entire- ly callous to every moral principle and feeling ; totally uncon- scious of ever having done anything wrong ; and completely des- titute of all sense of shame or remorse when reproved for his vices or crimes. He was utterly incorrigible through life ; was dismissed several times from the asylum, and was returned again, the last time, for attempting to poison his father. There was never any symptom of diseased action of the brain, bat he was obliged to be kept under restraint as a moral lunatic. This was indeed a most extraordinary case; and it would seem as if he were denied by Dature the possession of those moral powers, the due exercise of which, is essential to render an individual accountable. Moral imbecility is probably of more frequent occurrence than is generally supposed. Dr. Rush, in the course of his life, was consulted in three cases of moral imbecility. In all these, he says, there is probably an original defective organization in those parts of the body which are occupied by the moral faculties of the mind. It might, perhaps, be possible for one having the ingenuity of Hoflbauer, to attempt successfully a classification of the different degrees of moral imbecility. There are probably as many differ-' ent degrees of this, as of the intellectual, and possibly as dis- tinctly marked. There may, and often does exist, the usual in- tellectual power ; but coupled with it, a feebleness of purpose, inaptitude for business, disregard of duty, want of probity, and sometimes strength of passion, clearly indicating that the lack is not in the intellectual, but in the moral department. The dis- play of passion, which not unfrernently occurs, arises probably from the relatively greater strength possessed by the propensi- ties over the higher sentiments which ordinarily control and di- rect them. The harmonious movement of the mind is destroy- ed by this relative disproportion of strength, the higher senti- MENTAL ALIENATION. 481 meats being unable, through weakness and imbecility, to influ- ence and direct the action of the propensities, in consequence of which, they rush into irregular manifestations. Such individuals may pass through life weak, wavering, fickle, and self-willed; frequently the prey of designing knaves, and often " the inmates of jails and lunatic asylums. No attempt could be successfully made to prove them imbecile, in a court of justice, because they are possessed of intellect, and hence can- not in public estimation be imbecile. Their imbecility essential- ly consists in an absence of moral feeling, and a corresponding want of self-control. Sometimes a singular fancy takes posses- sion of the mind, and exerts over it a power very similar to a delusion or hallucination in a case of intellectual mania. This was manifested in the case of one William 0. Tillard, who entertained a childish fancy for wind-mills, with an equally strong aversion to water-mills. On one occasion, he cut the calves of a child's legs through to the bone, and stated that he should have taken away its life, in order that he might be tried for his act, and removed from a place where there were no wind-mills. The legal (consequences of imbecility will be deferred until we come to treat of those of Dementia The third form of alienation arising from defective ( develop- ment, or deficient power of mental manifestation, is Dementia. This form of mental alienation is attended by a general enfeeble- ment of the moral and intellectual faculties, and is consequent on mania, mental shocks, or injuries of the brain, or sometimes it exists in old age, and is then termed senile dementia. One great point of difference between this and idiocy, and imbecility, is, that in both the latter, the faculties are imperfect, while in the former they are enfeebled. In idiocy, the effect is congeni- tal ; in imbecility, it occurs in early life, while in dementia, it supervenes in a mind which is already fully developed. In idiocy and imbecility, the faculties are always childish, al- ways bear upon them the stamp of an original weakness. Their action is like the stream that never rises above its fountain-head, although it always rises to it. In dementia, there still remains the foot prints of manhood, the evidences of a power that is 31 482 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. gone, the glimmerings of a light that is nearly extinguished. It is like the efforts of a stream to rise as high as its fountain-head, but is unable to accomplish it, from obstructions or other causes. The former are congenital, or appear in early life, while the lat- ter never takes place until after puberty ; is most apt to occur as the sequel of other diseases, especially of the more active forms of mania, or to manifest itself at the close of a long life. When once firmly seated, it may continue for years, as in the case of Dean Swift ; and not unfrequently, after death, lesions of struc- ture, or diminutions in size, are found to have taken place in the brain. There are_ several points that serve to distinguish it from mania. While mania arises from a morbid excess of activity, and is characterized by great force and unusual rapidity ; de- mentia proceeds from enfeeblement in the action of the faculties, and consequent weakness and inefficiency in their displays. The maniac discerns not the ordinary characters of objects, and re- lations of things, amid the mass of ideas that crowd upon his* mind. The demented, through failure of strength, mistakes things, and is unable to rise to the comprehension of general truths. The maniac fails not so much in the force and logic of his conclusions, as in the incorrectness of his assumptions. In dementia, there is a paucity of ideas, a general feebleness of the perceptive and reflective powers. The memory of the maniac is defective because new ideas crowd in and mingle with the past. In dementia, there is an obliteration of impressions from insufficient power to retain them. Hurry and confusion are characteristic of mania ; slowness and suspension of the think- ing power, of dementia. When the dementia arises from a sudden mental shock, the disease generally takes its hue from that circumstance, and often presents great singularity in its character. The mind, in such a case, may remain fixed for the remainder of life upon one single event. This may be illustrated by the following case, found in Guy's Principles of Forensic Medicine, 296 : A fisherman in Norway was about to be married to a girl who resided in a distant vil MENTAL ALIENATION 483 lage, and Ihe day previous to that appointed for the wedding, he took his boat to go to his bride's house, to spend the night in feasting. She came to meet him, accompanied by her parents, and while the two boats were returning together, a sudden squall overset the boat which carried the bride, and she and her friends perished. From that moment, the fisherman became insane, his insanity having impressed upon it a peculiar character. He was accustomed to sit from morning till, night upon a small stool, which he fancied a boat, his arms and body constantly in the at- titude of rowing; and if any one appeared at the door, he warned his visitor to beware how he approached, as the water was deep. In another case, a man of great strength, of understanding, having performed important negotiation, under a promise of re- ceiving £300,000, upon being suddenly informed that he was to have nothing, fell back insensible, into the arms of his attend- ants ; his mind, from that time, sinking gradually into imbecility. He squandered the remains of his fortune in childish trinkets, and loved to exhibit himself dressed in rich garments, and hung with precious stones. One of the most striking characteristics that are observable in dementia, and which goes to show that the faculties are really deranged, as well as enfeebled, is the occurrence of incoherence. This feature we have not observed either in idiocy or imbecility. This incoherence is sometimes found to prevail in every intel- lectual department Persons, places, times, circumstances, are jumbled together; occur disjointedly ; succeeding each other without any regular order. It may be in part accounted for from a failure in the power of clearly distinguishing one thing from another. Objects dissimilar are mistaken for each other; and different times, as morning, neon, and evening, are blended to- gether. " Dementia," says Esquirol, " deprives men of the faculty of adequately perceiving objects, of seeing their relations, of com- paring them, of preserving a complete recollection of them, whence results the impossibility of reasoning correctly. De- mented persons are incapable of reasoning, because external ob- 484 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. jects make too feeble an impression on them ; because the organs of transmission have lost a part of their energy ; or, lastly, be- cause the brain itself has no longer sufficient strength to receive and retain the impression which is transmitted to it ; hence it necessarily results, that the sensations are feeble, obscure, in- complete. Being unable to form a true and just idea of objects, these persons cannot compare them, or exercise abstraction or association of ideas. They are not capable of a sufficiently strong attention ; the organ of thought has not energy enough ; it has been deprived of that vigor which is necessary for the integrity of its functions. Hence the most incongruous ideas succeed each other ; independent of each other, they follow without order and connexion. Patients repeat words and entire sentences without attaching to them any precise meaning ; they talk without be- ing conscious of what they say. It seems as if unreal expres- sions were heard by them, in their heads, which they repeat in obedience to some involuntary or automatic impulse, the result of previous habits, or of fortuitous association with objects which strike their senses." Senile dementia, or that which sometimes occurs to the aged, presents an instance of what is often termed chronic dementia. It does not consist alone in enfeeblement of the faculties, be- cause if it did, we should find every old man demented. There are several degrees or stages of it. In the first occurs a loss of memory, particularly of recent events, without any serious im- pairment of the reasoning faculties. Early impressions and ideas long retained, now come up fresh from their long resting place From forgetfulness of recent events, accompanied by recollec- tions of early ones, occur many of those gaps in ideas and inco- herences that, in part, constitute dementia. This defect, or loss of memory, generally marks the commencement of dementia from this cause, but not invariably. Sometimes it begins with nervous excitement, accompanied with the excitement of some faculty, function, or active power, which may act with great energy. Some become irritated by the slightest circumstance ; others experience venereal desires long since extinguished ; while others still, of regular, temperate, and sober habits, all at once MENTAL ALIENATION. 485 manifest an appetite for high seasoned dishes, and intoxicating drinks. These symptoms are soon succeeded by those of de- mentia. The second degree is characterized by a loss of the reasoning power. Either the reflective faculties are so completely impair- ed that they are unable to exercise their functions, or the other faculties, particularly the affective, are so much enfeebled, that the will does not possess sufficient strength and energy to carry- out any process of reasoning. The premises are scarcely laid down, before they are forgotten. Hence the inability to draw any conclusions from them. The transaction of any business which requires a sustained attention, becomes impossible. Any slight or irrelevant idea, by disturbing the attention, draws the mind off from what it was considering, and thus destroys all at- tempts at continuous efforts. Some individuals in this stage re- cognize their friends, but seldom display signs of emotion on see ing them. The next stage, or third degree, is termed incomprehension, and is attended by inability to comprehend the meaning of any prin- ciple, or proposition, however simple, that is proposed. Atten- tion, memory, reason, all but the mere instincts, are entirely lost. Here is sometimes found a great degree of physical activity ; some jumping, running, walking ; others dancing, singing, and vociferating. Some are talking unmeaning jargon ; others mut- tering half sentences, or broken expressions ; while others are found sitting in silence, scarcely pronouncing a syllable for weeks, months, or even years. The fourth and last degree, consists in a loss of instinctive ac- tion. The very animal instincts are here lost. The mode of existence is merely organic. There is neither desire or aversion, hardly a consciousness of life. The following description of those reduced to this last stage of dementia, is taken from Dr. Prichard's Different Forms of Insanity, 238-9: " Sometimes an individual may be seen standing erect, and im- movable, with his head and neck bent almost at right angles with his trunk; his eyes fixed upon the ground, never appearing, by 486 MEDICAL JtTBISPRUDENCE. any movement or gesture, to be conscious of external impres- sions, or even of his own existence. Another sits on a rocking- chair, which she agitates to and fro, and throws her limbs into the most uncouth positions, at the same time chaunting or yell- ing a dissonant song, only capable of expressing a total inanity of ideas and feelings. Many sit constantly still, with their chins resting upon their breasts, their eyes and mouths half open, un- conscious of hunger or thirst, and almost destitute of the feel- ings which belong to mere physical life ; they would never rise or lie down, were they not placed in bed. A great proportion of the patients who are reduced to this degree of fatuity, are found to have lost the use of their limbs, in a greater or less de- gree, by partial or general paralysis." The second class embraces that extensive range of cases in which the insane character arises from the excessive and de- ranged action of the faculties. We have here the active forms of mania, which in their exhibition give rise to many varieties. This in general does not consist so much in manifesting any par- ticular extravagance of thought or feeling, as by a change of character, or a departure from ordinary habits of life. It has been well laid down by a distinguished writer, that " it is the prolonged departure, without an adequate external cause, from the state of feeling, and modes of thinking, usual to the indi- vidual when in health, that is the true feature of disorder in mind." To judge, therefore, of the existence of mania in any alleged case, it is as important to know what have been the temper, dis- position, and habits of the individual, as the present symptoms which are supposed to evidence the disease. Mania is generally preceded by what has been termed its in- cubation. This is marked by several pretty clear indications. The individual often becomes conscious of having new and odd notions, unusual inclinations ; his affections changing ; he be- comes sleepless, his appetite diminishes, constipation supervenes, the features alter ; the gay and communicative become sad, mo- rose, and averse to society ; the economical, prodigal ; the open and candid, suspicious and jealous. Business is neglected, tears MENTAL ALIENATION. 487 and laughter succeed each other without any apparent cause or reason. This state may continue longer or shorter, according to cir- cumstances. In one case, it was in progress for fifteen years. When this state has continued for some time, a disappointment, a slight contradiction, or a paroxysm of anger, may give rise to the sudden explosion of mania. In the active forms of mania, the physical indications are not to be disregarded. A febrile excitement prevails ; the pulse is accelerated ; the eye is wild and glassy ; the sensations have be- come changed, being either more acute or more obtuse. They are -frequently erroneous. The countenance is changed, exhibit- ing physical pain or mental disquietude. There is often a great insensibility to external impressions; heat, cold, hunger, and thirst, being more or less entirely disregarded. The muscular- power is often inordinately developed, giving rise to the perform- ance of acts far beyond the presumed strength of the individual. He sleeps little, and his slumbers are much disturbed. One great difficulty seems to consist in the destruction or per- version of that influence which, in the healthy state, is mutually exercised by the faculties over, or in relation to, each other ; the right exercise 'of which constitutes the harmonious result of all the possible exhibitions of mind. The control of mind over it- self seems to be lost. In a state of sanity, the different faculties, like the different parts of a machine, all conspire together in their mutual action to one harmonious result. In mania, the same faculties may act with power and energy, but independent- ly of each other, and thus the result be discord, derangement, and disorder. That modification of mind which constitutes a sane will is wanting, and hence the strange perversions and sin- gular eccentricities exhibited. ' It is probably beyond the power of the sane man to conceive the confusion which reigns in the mind of the madman. " A series of delusions, the offspring of some one excited passion or emotion, or one single delusion, the work of fancy, the interpre- ter of every sensation, the source of every thought, the main- spring of every action, holding every faculty in stern subjection, 488 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. making the senses its dupes, the reason its advocate, the fancy its sport, and the will its slave ; now whispering in the ear things unspoken, now painting on the eye things unseen ; changing hu man beings at will into fiends or angels; converting every sen- sation into a vision ; every sound into articulate speech ; the un- real world within in constant conflict with the real world with- out ; understood of no one, yet believing himself to be compre- hended by all ; punished for the very actions which he supposes his tyrants to have commanded ; controlled in everything which he thinks it his duty to perform. There is no wish, however presumptuous — no fancy, however monstrous — no action, how- ever absurd — no crime, however heinous, that his delusion can- not create, prompt, and justify. That a sane man might form a conception, however faint, of the distraction of such a state as this, it would be necessary to combine into one whole, the strange confusion of a dream, and the sleeper's entire belief in its reality ; the varying impressions and changing scenes of his waking hours, and the conduct, to him wholly unintelligible, of those about him." Guy, 328. Mania has two divisions : The first embraces Intellectual Mania, both General and Partial : The second, Moral Mania, both General and Partial. This division or classification of the active forms of Mania, will fail to be clearly understood, except by those who have ac- customed themselves to look at the mind, in its sane state, as be- ing made up of intellectual and moral powers and faculties, and of clearly discriminating the differences between them. The dis- tinct office of the one, is to originate and elaborate all the diver- sified forms of thought ; to perceive, conceive, imagine, remem- ber, judge, associate, reason. That of the other, is to produce every modified form of feeling, to give birth to emotions, pas- sions, desires, everything that impels, or in any degree feels. The relations in which these two departments stand to each other, are in the highest degree interesting. The moral faculties, embracing as they do, all the instincts, propensities, sentiments, and affective powers, are, in themselves, perfectly blind, and ab- MENTAL ALIENATION. 489 solutely require the aid of the intellect to enlighten, to guide and to enable them to work out their various purposes. On the other hand, the intellectual faculties derive all their motives to exertion from the moral department, without the promptings of which, they probably never would exert them- selves except in the feeblest manner. In the moral or affective department is lodged the immense magazine of motives, that ex- ert their ceaseless, and widely diversified influence, over all the stirring activities of life. The relations of mutual dependence in which these two depart- ments stand to each other, are very nearly analogous to those ex- isting between the heart and brain in the animal economy. The continuance of the heart's action is -necessary to enable the brain to furnish that nervous influence without which that action would cease ; while, on the other hand, the brain must continue to fur- nish that influence, or the heart would speedily cease its pulsa- tions. The first we shall here take up is, GENERAL INTELLECTUAL MANIA. This form of mental alienation is accompanied with the utmost Cu.ixusion and disorder in the action of the intellectual faculties. The exalted and perverted action of all these must produce a complete chaos of intellect. It is extremely difficult to define in what intellectual mania essentidly consists. In regard to consciousness, which is a mode of action common to all the faculties, intellectual and moral, the maniac undoubtedly possesses it. Not only is he conscious of his state, but also very frequently of the legal relations in which it places him. A madman had contrived to give a piece of iron the shape of a dagger, and had firmly fixed into it a handle. On its being taken away from him he became excessively abusive, and, in a fit of fury, exclaimed to the keeper, " Vll murder you yet : I am a madman and they cannot hang me for it." The firing of York Minster by Martin, gave rise to a discussion in relation to his probable fate in a neighboring mad-house. In the midst of it one of the inmates exclaimed, " he (Martin) will not be 490 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE hanged, of course lie will escape." " For what reason," asked several. " They cannot hang him" replied the lunatic, " because he is mad, he is one of ourselves." The sensation of the maniac is often influenced by some dis- eased affection. The female mentioned by Esquirol, who fancied she had a living animal in her stomach, was found to lr ve beet laboring under a cancer of that viscus ; and the woman who be- lieved that the pope and his cardinals were holding a co'incil in her belly, was discovered to have labored under a chronic 'nflam- mation of the peritoneum. Independent of disease, the senses do not always seem to furnish correct reports to the semorium. In the autobiography of the maniac he says : " My senses were all mocked at and deceived. In reading, my eyes saw words on the paper which, when I looked again, were not. The forms of those around me, and their features, changed even as I looked on them : I heard the voices of invisible agents, and notes so divine, so pure, so holy, that they alone, perhaps, might recom- pense me for many sufferings: My sense of feeling was not fchfi same ; my smell, my taste, gone or confounded." The perception of the maniac may be correct, although morbid impressions may influence the judgments based upon them. For instance, an insane female entertained the firm conviction that her husband was dead, and when he came jto visit her she insisted upon it that it was the devil in his shape. The perception of what constituted her husband was correct, but her judgment based upon it was erroneous. The memory, so far as the simple recollection is concerned, does not appsar to be affected in this form of mania. The maniac undoubtedly exercises memory, but he remembers his own halu- cinations or delusions, as much or more clearly than he does real events. The judgment is the most generally perverted. The lady who insisted that a tooth which a dentist had removed, had slipped from his fingers and stuck in her throat, and that she could not swallow a morsel, while she eat and drank heartily all the time, was wrong both in her premises and conclusion ; and Bellingham, who imagined that the government had been culpably negligent MENTAL ALIENATION. 491 of his private interests, and, therefore, he proceede to take the life of a man whom he believed to be perfectly innocent, in order that he might have an opportunity of bringing his affairs before the country, erred in almost every act of his judgment. The mere judgments formed, however, are often correct in themselves, although they may be exercised in reference to some erroneous impression, or utterly unfounded notion, which may constitute the main feature of the alienation. The man who imagines Ms legs to be made of glass, entertains a very erroneous impression, but in acting upon that imagination, he judges very correctly when he avoids a blow with a stick, because on the supposition that they were glass, they might, in that manner, easily be broken. So also the man who supposes himself a plant, and, under that impression, stationed himself in his garden to be watered, judged correctly admitting the truth of his supposition. The reasoning power of the maniac is by no means abrogated, but the misfortune is, that it is exercised in reference to his de- lusions or hallucinations, and not to facts as they really exist. The power of reasoning is sometimes very acute. An instance is given of a Jesuit, named Sgambari, who believed himself a cardinal, and claimed to be addressed by the title of eminence. A friend was anxious to convince him of Ms error, and obtained, on one occasion, a patient hearing. When he had finished the madman replied, " Either you consider me insane or rational ; on the latter supposition you do me injustice by your remon- strances ; on the former, I hardly know which is most mad, I for believing myself a cardinal, or you, for tMnking to cure a madman by such reasonings." The associations of the maniac are wild, strange, and unnatural. This mode of activity of the faculties, is usually extremely dis- ordered. The power of association remains, but its exercise is strangely perverted. It is obedient to the prevailing delusion or hallucination. The maniac, for instance, who wrote his auto- biography, associated the inmates of the asylum and his keepers with supernatural beings. There was a maniac there whom his spirit called the Lord Jehovah, supremely omnipotent, the trinity in unity ; and one of the keepers was supposed by Mm to be the 492 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. Savior of mankind. At other times these same persons assumed other shapes, and according to the state of his mind, were either fiends or angels. This delusion could give to any object any shape it pleased. Gwy's Principles of Forensic Medicine, 324. The feature which the most distinctly characterises intellectual mania, both general and partial, is the entertainment of delusion or hallucination. This is of two kinds. In the one, the maniac believes in the reality of things that never existed, and acts in conformity with his belief. In the other, he seizes upon things that are not wholly unfounded, and carries them to erroneous and extravagant lengths. The strange antics of the maniac, and his violent conduct, are often traceable to the delusions that ty- rannize over the movements of his mind. As intellectual mania arises from the perverted action of the faculties that form ideas, and moral mania from those that furnish feelings, emotions, motives, and passions, we should naturally expect to find the first more characterised by the conversation, and the last, by the conduct, of the individual. This accordingly will be found to be the fact, and it affords one of the best means of discriminating between the two. The maniac almost uniformly entertains the conviction of his own sanity. He trusts in the truthi'ulness of his own feelings and ideas, and no force of argument can, in the slightest degree, shake his confidence in his opinions. The state of highest mani- acal excitement has been ably described by Pinel. " The patient," he says, " sometimes keeps his head elevated, and his looks fixed on high ; he speaks in a low voice, or utters cries and vocifera- tions, without any apparent motive. He walks to and fro, and sometimes arrests his steps, as if excited by the sentiment of ad- miration, or wrapt up in profound reverie. Some insane persons display wild excesses of merriment, with immoderate bursts of laughter. Sometimes also, as if nature delighted in contrasts, gloom and taciturnity prevail, with involuntary showers of tears, or the anguish of deep sorrow, with all the external signs of acute mental suffering In certain cases a sudden reddening of the eyes, and excessive loquacity, give presage of a speedy explosion of violent madness, and the urgent necessity of a strict seclusion, MENTAL ALIENATION. 493 One lunatic, after long intervals of calmness, spoke, at first, with volubility ; he uttered frequent shouts of laughter, and then shed a torrent of tears ; experience had taught the necessity of shutting him up immediately, for his paroxysms were, at such times, of the greatest violence." When intellectual mania prevails alone, there is no perversion of the moral faculties. But it is often, perhaps, more generally than otherwise, found complicated with moral mania. To this fact is to be attributed the peevishness and unevenness of tem- per, the sensitiveness and utter disregard of the proprieties of life, and the great and apparently radical change that sometimes takes place in the affections, that is oftentimes observable in cases of intellectual mania. Partial Intellectual Mania. This was formerly known by the term melancholia, but more recently has been styled mono- mania. , This last mentioned term is not quite as distinctive as it should be, as it is equally applicable to any partial derange- ment of the moral powers. The first appearance, and most simple form of this species of derangement, consists in the entertaining of some strange and fantastic notion, against which the verdict of common sense would be most unqualifiedly rendered. Thus, in the case mentioned by Sir George Makenzie, the individual seemed a discreet person, and could converse appropriately on every subject until the moon was mentioned ; and, upon hearing that named, he would fall instantly a-staring, and into great extravagancies, believing himself to be secretary to that satellite. Guy, 305. Many find singular have been these notions. Some have imagined they had a living animal within them, and that they were gradually dying from other animals preying upon different parts of their bodies. Others, that they are converted into animals of other species, such as geese, a cock, a dog, a cat, a hare, a cow, and the like. In such cases, they adopt the noises and gestures of the animals into which they suppose themselves to be transformed. Rush on Diseases of the Mind, 78-9, 80. A prince of the house of Bour- bon supposed himself a plant. Some have supposed themselves transformed into glass. One believes that by discharging the 494 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. contents of his bladder, he shall drown the world ; another, thai he is dead, stretching himself out, and assuming the semblance of his final sleep. One remarkable instance is the Reverend Simon Brown, who for many years before his death, entertained the belief that he had lost his rational soul. He supposed that God had caused it gradually to perish, and that he had only re- maining the animal life, which he enjoyed in common with the brutes. A lunatic in Wartsburgh supposed there was a per- son concealed within his belly, with whom he held frequent com- munication, and that too, although he was, at the very time, struck with the absurdity of the idea. The delusive idea in which the derangement consists, may be sometimes traced to some bodily sensation or disease. Thus, a woman insisted that she was pregnant with the devil, and in her womb, after death, was found a mass of hydatids. Another imagined that a regiment of soldiers lay concealed in her belly, and that she could feel them struggling and fighting with each other. After death, the intestines were found agglutinated to- gether, in consequence of chronic peritonitis. But this is not always the cause, otherwise it would not admit of the kind of curejthat may sometimes be effected, viz., an impression made upon the mind. This was illustrated in the person who sup- posed himself cured of a serpent in his bowels by a pretended surgical operation, but suddenly took the idea that it had left }ts ova behind, from which a brood of young ones would be hatched. This delusion was quickly banished by the dexterous reply of the physician, that this was impossible, because the snake was a male. Guy's Principles of Forensic Medicine, 306. The delusion not unfrequently bears a near relation to the for- mer habits of business, or to the usual occupation, of the mono- maniac. The son of an attorney who was frequently employed in criminal prosecutions, fancied himself suspected of some hor- rible crime, for which a process had been issued against him, and whenever the door of Ms room was opened, he supposed the officers of justice were coming to apprehend him. The monomaniac, unlike the maniac, is often conscious of his own derangement, and frequently succeeds, for a long period of MENTAL ALIENATION. 495 time, in concealing it. He thus furnishes evidence of the convic- tion on his part, that the common sense of mankind believes him insane on one particular topic, or train of ideas, at the same time that he clings to that topic or train with a strong and unyielding tenacity. It must not be supposed that every affection of an intellectual faculty amounts to mental alienation. Many of the perceptive faculties may be disordered in their functions. Some of them may be even entirely obliterated, and yet the mind retain the general integrity of its powers. This, however, cannot probably happen where those faculties that discern the relations of things are disordered in their functions. There are instances where the faculty of language has been impaired, and sometimes totally des- troyed, without at all appearing to injure the general action of mind, or to render it less sane in its operations. In one re- markable instance, a gentleman of sixty totally lost the memory of places, so that he could not recollect bis own house ; although his intellect was sound in reference to all other things. The simplest form of this species of alienation is where the in- sane delusion is confined to a single topic, and this will, some- times continue unchanged for a number of years. At other times, t ae features of the derangement vary, and different delusions or ljallucinations prevail, either successively or together. The original tendency to become monomaniac on one subject, appearf to render it less difficult to become so on any other, or a numbei of others. Where the alienation relates to a single topic or idea, the in- tellect may be sane on all other subjects. There is, however, much difficulty in marking out the precise barriers of insane de- lusion. The particular topic or idea in which it consists, may be so blended with others, as to pervert or derange them. It may also happen that many cases of so called monomania, are ex- amples of general mania, characterized by the immoderate activity of some one faculty. Of Mobal Mania. Hitherto, the attention has only been di- rected to the exaltation and perverted action of those faculties that constitute the intellectual part of man's nature. It is per 496 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. fectly obvious, however, that the affective or moral powers are equally as essential as the intellectual, in constituting a complete human mind. Nor can the organs of these faculties claim an exemption from disease ; nor the faculties themselves from per- version and derangement. Hence, another form of active mania, which has been termed moral mania. This was never recognized as a distinct form of mental aliena- tion, until the time of Pinel. He was the first to observe, about the commencement of the present century, that where there was no lesion of the understanding, no delusion or hallucination of intellect, there might exist a kind of instinctive or abstract fury, which could be referable only to the affective power's. It is now very universally admitted by the most approved writers on mental alienation. It is defined to consist in a morbid per- version of the natural feelings, affections, inclinations, temper, habits and moral dispositions, without any notable lesion of the intellect or knowing and reasoning faculties, and .particularly without any maniacal hallucination. Guy's Principles of Forens'ic Medicine, 306. Moral mania, like intellectual, is divided into general and partial. General Moral Mania. This form of mania consists in a general exaltation, perversion, or derangement of function, of ?11 the affective or moral powers. Those who have observed, and written upon this form of mental alienation, unite in describing those who labor under it as persons of singular, wayward, and eccentric character. Their antipathies are violent, and suddenly taken ; their suspicions unjust and severe, and their propensities strong and eagerly indulged. They are generally proud, con- ceited, ostentatious, easily excited, and obstinate in the main- taining of absurd opinions. It will be often found, on enquiry, that there is in the family an hereditary tendency to insanity ; and, possibly, that the individual himself has been afflicted with it in an earlier period of his life. A strict enquiry must be made in relation to his former habits, disposition, and modes of feeling and action. This will, probably, result in the discovery of one of two things. Either a marked change will be found to have occurred, which will be likely to MENTAL ALIENATION. 497 date from the period when he sustained some reverse of fortune, or experienced the loss of some near and dear relative ; or the alteration will be found to have been gradual and imperceptible, consisting in an exaltation or increase of peculiarities which 'were always natural or habitual. There is, also, another tolera- bly extensive class of cases, in which the change has been con- sequent upon some shock which the bodily constitution has undergone ; and this has been either a disorder affecting the head, an attack of paralysis, a fit of epilepsy, or some fever or inflam- matory disorder. The change, however brought about, is always found in the temper, disposition, habits, and moral qualities of the individual ; and is uncomplicated with any delusion or other evidence of de rangement of the intellectual faculties. It is properly described by Hoffbauer as being " a state in which the reason has lost its empire over the passions, and the actions by which they are manifested, to such a degree, that the individual can neither re- press the former nor abstain from the latter. It does not follow, that he may not be in possession of Ms senses, and even his usual intelligence ; since, in order to resist the impulses of the passions, it is not sufficient that the reason should impart its counsels, we must have the necessary power to obey them. The maniac may judge correctly of his actions, without being in a condition to repress his passions, and to abstain from the acts of violence to which they impel him." To an acute and accurate observer, a marked contrast will be here presented between the intellectual and moral faculties. In the former, there is no diminished force or perverted action. The power of reasoning not only remains unimpaired, but gene- rally displays a greater strength than natural, in accounting for those eccentricities, and waywardness of character, and peculiar displays of temper and passion, that mark the course of the moral maniac. He can paint, with unabated force, the beauties of vir- tue, and the excellency of truth, justice, mercy, and every other moral quality ; while his conduct exhibits only the extreme of folly, and is in direct opposition to all moral propriety. This general derangement of the moral powers is very likely 32 498 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. to pass into and affect the intellectual. Indeed, so frequently does this occur, that it has actually been described by Georget and others as belonging to the initiatory stage or incubation of madness. It is, however, well settled, that either form of the disease may exist independent of the other, and that either one of them may be made the subject of distinct medico-legal inves- tigation. Whenever this form of mania, becomes the subject of legal investigation, great difficulties are always presented. The popular mind is accustomed to recognize insanity only in delusion, and to couple it with raving, and lesions of intellect, never observable in pure moral mania. Hence the extreme difficulty in proving this form of it, and the different kinds of testimony offered by the witnesses. One has seen the individual in connection with his business, and observed him regular and methodical in all his busi- ness arrangements, and to all appearance perfectly regular in the use of his intellect. Another has had some opportunity of no- ticing some strange and unaccountable eccentricity of conduct, totally irreconcilable with the possession and exercise of a sane mind. The facts, to which these two would testify, would ap- parently be wholly at variance with each other, and yet when the real form of the malady is known, would be entirely consis- tent. One general remark here will be found to be universally ap- plicable. As we found the conversation to affordthe means of indicating the existence of intellectual mania, so the conduct is equally as clear a means of indicating that of moral mania. This follows from the fact, that intellectual mania, resulting as it does from a derangement of the faculties that form ideas, would be recognized more readily in the derangement of those ideas of which the conversation would be evidence ; while the conduct being under the prompting and guidance of the affective or moral powers, would naturally be regarded as affording clear in- dications of the state and condition of those powers. Many cases, illustrating this peculiar form of mania, are to be found in writers on insanity, particularly in the works of Ray and Priehard. The following, given simply as an illustration, is MENTAL ALIENATION. 499 one quoted from Prichard by Ray. Ray's Medical Jurisprudence of Insanity, 172-3. " J. K., a farmer, several of whose relatives had been the sub- jects of mental derangement, was a man of sober and domestic habits, and frugal and steady in his conduct, until about his forty-fifth year, when his disposition appeared to have become suddenly changed, in a manner which excited the surprise of his friends and neighbors, and occasioned grief and vexation in his family. He became wild, excitable, thoughtless, full of schemes and absurd projects. He would set out and make long journeys into distant parts of the country to purchase cattle and farming- stock, of which he had no means of disposing ; he bought a number of carriages, hired an expensive house ready furnished, which had been inhabited by a person much above his rank, and was unsuitable to his condition ; he was irascible and impetuous, quarrelled with his neighbors, and committed an assault upon the clergyman of the parish, for which he was indicted and bound to take his trial. At length, his wife became convinced that he was mad, and made application for his confinement in a lunatic asylum, which was consequently eifected The medical practi- tioners who examined him were convinced of his insanity, by comparing his late wild habits and unaccountable conduct with the former tenor of his life, taking into consideration the tendency to disease which was known to prevail in his family. The change in his character alone had produced a full conviction of his mad- ness in his friends and relatives. When questioned as to the motives which had induced him to some of his late proceedings, he gave clear and distinct replies, and assigned with great ingenu- ity some plausible reason for almost every part of his conduct." In some instances, old men in the decline of life, who have led long and virtuous lives, become amicted with this form of mania. In such case, the whole moral character becomes changed, the pious becoming impious ; the economical, profuse ; the liberal, penurious ; the sober, drunken. Impulses that had long been effete become suddenly excited, and a .strong tendency to the formation of vicious habits is manifested. It would seem as if the lower propensities, or some of them, had been gathering fresh 500 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. vigor through a long life, in order to make their peculiar and offensive displays near the close of it ; or, (what, perhaps, is the most probable,) the guards placed over them in the in.ellect and high moral feelings are relaxed through weakness, and hence leave unrestrained the play of propensity and passion. Partial Moral Mania consists in the deranged or perverted action of one, or a few, of the aifective or moral powers and facul- ties. The effect of it is to place the individual under the domin- ion of some one vice, or ruling idea, which exercises a sway, perfectly tyrannical, over the entire man and his actions. Every moral power or faculty is liable to be perverted or deranged in its manifestation ; but those which are the most prominent, and the most frequently exhibited in the affairs and conduct of life, are the most liable to deranged action. Hence, the propensities are, in general, more frequently found deranged than the senti- ments, and some of the sentiments much more frequently than others. We will notice a few of the affective or moral sentiments that are liable to derangement. The sexual propensity is liable to deranged action, arising from a morbid or diseased condition of its organ. An individual of either sex, under the influence of it, is constantly haunted by a crowd of voluptuous images, and hurried away into the perpetra- tion of acts of the grossest licentiousness. It is known by the term erotic mania. An instance is mentioned of a very intelligent lady, who was tormented, from early life, with the most inordinate desires. Her good education alone, for some time, saved her from the rash in- dulgences to which this propensity so violently urged her. Ar- rived at maturity, she abandoned herself to the gratification of her desires, but this only increased their intensity. Frequently, she saw herself on the verge of madness ; and, in despair, she left her house and the city, and took refuge with her mother, who resided in the country, where the absence of objects to excite desire, the greater severity of manners, and the culture of a gar- den, prevented the explosion of the disease. After having changed her residence for that of a large city, she was, after a while, threatened with a relapse, and again she took refuge with MENTAL ALIENATION. 501 her mother. On her return to Paris, she complained like. a woman in perfect despair. " Everywhere," she exclaimed, " I see nothing but the most lascivious images ; the demon of lust unremittedly pursues me, at the table, and even in my sleep. I am an object of disgust to myself, and feel that I can no longer escape either madness or death." Ray's Med. Juris, of Insanity, 188. The case of Lord Dudley reported in 3 HowePs State Trials, 401, furnishes a remarkable instance of the perverted action of this propensity. He was tried, found guilty and executed, k. committing a rape upon his own wife, and for the crime against nature. The testimony on this trial developed, to an extraordi- nary degree, the action of this propensity. It appeared as the constant theme of thought, and in all the possible varieties of sexual intercourse, he appeared to take an intense and peculiar interest. A number of instances of this kind of mania are cited in Ray, 186, &c. A very remarkable fact is stated in Morrison's Physiog- nomy of Mental Diseases, 76, going to show the extreme tenacity with which insane ideas adhere to the mind. During the first attack of the Asiatic cholera in the Lunatic Asylum at Hanwell, in September and October, 1832, when only females were the subjects of it, several patients, laboring under erotic mania, ex- hibited lasciviousness in their words and actions, in the highest degree, long after the pulse at the wrist had ceased to be percep- tible, and the skin and the tongue had become quite cold, indeed, until a very short time before they expired. To show the irresistable character of the promptings of this propensity, and the entire deprivation of moral liberty to which it leads, reference may be had to Graham's Lecture, 201, in which he gives extracts from a letter written by the chaplain of one of our State prisons, in reference to the practice of self -pollution among the prisoners. He speaks of one prisoner in particular, who, when he first knew him, had a full and ruddy cheek, which, in a little time, became pale and sunken, and who confessed that he had become a slave to that vice, and feared it was doing him harm ; for, said he, " 1 seem to have no power over myself. I awake 502 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. from my sleep and find myself in the act. Three times a night, for weeks in succession, I have yielded to it, and frequently without being voluntary in the thing." The deranged action of this propensity sometimes leads to a more general form of mania. Cleptomania, or propensity to steal, is another instance of partial moral mania. This form of it was observed by Dr. Rush. He remarked " that there are persons who are moral to the highest degree as to certain duties, but who, nevertheless, live under the influence of some one vice. In one instance, a woman was ex- emplary in her obedience to every command of the moral law but one, — she could not refrain from stealing. What made this vice more remarkable was, that she was in easy circumstances, and not addicted to extravagance in anything. Such was the propensity to this vice, that when she could lay her hands on nothing more valuable, she would often, at the table of a friend, fill her pockets secretly with bread. She both confessed and lamented her crime." Rush's Medical Inquiries and Observations, 1 Many remarkable instances of the morbid action of this pro- pensity may be found in writers on insanity, as Prichard, Ray, and Guy. It sometimes exhibits itself as a leading feature, if not sole characteristic, of moral mania ; as, in the lunatic who would only eat what he had stolen, and his keeper made it a constant practice to conceal his food, that he might find and get possession of it furtively before eating it. It is sometimes found coupled with abnormal conditions of brain ; as, in one case, where it was ill organized and ricketty, and another, where it was preternaturally small. It is often found complicated with general mania. Instances are given by Pinel of persons who, in their lucid intervals, were considered models of probity, but who could not refrain from stealing and cheating during the paroxysm. It has been observed to follow diseases or injuries of the brain. A young man, of correct habits, received a severe blow on the temple, for which he was trepanned, and afterwards manifested an invincible propensity to steal. Ray, 183. The late Dr. Smith, of New-Haven, observed a similar effect to follow an attack of typhus fever. MENTAL ALIENATION. 503 It is sometimes followed by general mania, as in the case that fell under the observation of Fodere. It has, in some cases, been found connected with certain states and conditions of the animal economy. There are instances of women who, when pregnant, were violently impelled to steal, though perfectly upright at all other times. The recorded instances are extremely numerous, showing the lerangement of this propensity ; but the most extraordinary one is of recent occurrence, in the case of Charles Sprague, reported in 6 Vol. of American Journal of Insanity, page 254. He was the son of a respectable clergyman. His paternal grandmother, great- grandmother, and some other relatives on the same side, had been insane. When young, and only about seven years of age, he ex- perienced several severe injuries of the head, and would, at times, complain of the headache, and, at such times, was observed to have an unnatural prominence and dullness or glassiness of his eyes, which continued after the headache had ceased. Simulta- neously, or closely succeeding the first occurrence of these facts, it was found that the shoes of the female members of the family, occasionally the pair, although more generally one of them, were missing ; and, after some time, would be found thoroughly soaked in water, twisted up like a rope, and hid away in some secret part of the house. After a time, it was traced to Charles. This strange habit continued from that time forward, with occasional inter- missions of perhaps three or four months, until in August, 1849, he overtook a young lady in the street, in Brooklyn, threw her down, snatched a shoe from one of her feet, and ran off with it, for which he was indicted and tried for highway robbery. His own account of the transaction to his father was, that he did not know much, if anything, about it, except what the witnesses told him ; that he did not deny it ; that he thinks he was going along in the street, and caught sight of a shoe, and it flashed into his mind like lightning that he wanted it, and he dove, for it ; that he did not know what he wanted with it, nor what he ever wanted with one; that he did not know how he got the girl down ; that the whole affair was a kind of haze before his mind, that his first distinct recollection of what took place that morn- 504 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. ing was of being near the printing office, after the affair had hap- pened, about half a mile beyond where it occurred. In every other respect, his moral character was shown to have been per- fectly faultless, and his habits all correct. He was respectably married, and had one child. Of the hundreds of instances in which he had exercised this singular propensity, he had been seen to take a shoe but twice. He never took any but women's slioes. It seems clearly to have been a case of irresponsibility. Another insane manifestation occasionally witnessed is that of lying, in persons otherwise of irreproachable morals and good education. This seems to result from an inability to tell the truth, rather than from any other cause. It must be admitted, however, that this vice may be owing to circumstances purely moral, such as faulty education, evil examples, and a lax morality, and hence that there may be great difficulty in discriminating between that which proceeds from moral and physical causes. If it proceed from the physical, and be a case of partial moral mania, there will most probably have been a change observable in the individual. There may also be present some physical indications of mental alienation. That it does occasionally pro- ceed from those causes appears pretty evident from the fact, that it is liable to degenerate into unequivocal mania, and is also quite a common feature of this disease. Another faculty in the moral constitution of man which is ex- tremely liable to derangement is cautiousness, or that w r hich gives birth to the sentiment of fear. The influence of this sentiment, in the sane state, is all-pervading. When, therefore, it becomes deranged, we may reasonably expect to witness great, if not frightful results. The derangement here is probably more fre- quently functional than physical in its causes. There is hardly a single event or movement in all life's vicissitudes, that does not make some appeal to the sentiment of fear. The force and power of the appeal must depend upon the natural inherent strength of the sentiment. The direction taken by the sentiment, in its manifestation, will be governed by the other faculties with which it may happen to be associated. When united with adhesiveness, it fears the lo^s MENTAL ALIENATION. 505 of friends or of friendships ; when with acquisitiveness, that of wealth or worldly possessions ; when with love of approbation, it fears the miseries of a blasted name ; and when with the re- ligious feelings, the terrible and afflictive visitations of the Su- preme Being. The melancholic is described as generally thin and emaciated, the hair straight and black, the skin cold and clammy, the look fixed and motionless. He seldom sleeps much, and when occa- sional slumber visits his eyes, a thousand ugly phantoms present themselves to his disturbed imagination, and terrify him into wakefulness. So entirely is the mind absorbed in one single idea, that com- mon sensation, to a great extent, seems to have abandoned the bodily organs. They are unsusceptible to impressions, and the intellectual faculties, in extreme cases, suspend the exercise of their functions. The mental misery in that state termed despair is truly apall- ing. A clergyman who passed four years and an half in that state in describing his own feelings says, that " he felt the bodily pains and mental anguish of the damned ; that he slumbered only, but never slept soundly during the long period of four and an half years ; that he lost his appetites and passions, so as to desire and relish nothing, and to love and hate no one ; that his feet were constantly cold and the upper part of his body warm ; that he lost all sense of years, months, week", days and nights, and even of morning and evening, and that in this respect time was to him no more. During the whole period of his misery, he kept his hands in constant motion towards his head and thighs, and ceased not constantly to cry out, wretched man that I am ! I am damned ! oh ! I am damned everlastingly ! " Rush on the Mind, 93. But the horrors of deranged cautiousness sometimes end not with despair. There are symptoms even beyond this terrible picture. Even the deep seated principle of the love of life is occasionally extinguished, and the ardent wish to die originate? from the severity of mental suffering. In such cases life is some- times destroyed by the frenzied energy to which itself gives birth. 506 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. and suicide is actually perpetrated in order to escape from the horrors of existence. But there is a state of mind even beyond this, and which is still more distressing. It is where both the desire and the fear of death operate alternately upon the same mind. Dr. Rush says he has seen this state. It was in a lady who wished to be re- lieved from the horror of her thoughts by the complete loss of her reason. v This is beautifully expressed by Shakespeare in his King Lear : " Better I were distract ; So should my thoughts be severed from my griefs, And woes, bi/ wrong imaginations, lose The knowledge of themselves." So almost infinite are the sources of misery in the human 1 mind. Who shall say that its sources of enjoyment are not cor- respondingly extensive 1 Hope is perhaps as strong a sentiment as fear, and as influen- tial in the conduct of life. A derangement of this faculty is sometimes, although not near so frequently met with, in which the torch of the malady may be said to be lit up at the fires of a joyful heart. Those affected with this species of derangement are always happy ; no cloud rests on their horizon, no apprehen- sion dampens their enjoyment. Their eye sees nothing but beauty, their ear hears nothing but music, their tongue talks nothing but rapture. Theirs is a course of light, and whether in their own mansion or a mad-house their present is full of joy, and their future of hope. The mind riots amid its own ruins, and invests even them with the hue of the rainbow. There are several other sentiments such as benevolence, vene- ration, self-esteem, &c, that are occasionally met with in a de- ranged state, but they are of such unfrequent occurrence, and so seldom become subjects of medico-legal investigation, that the particular consideration of them here is unnecessary. The most interesting, the most fatally destructive, the most frequently met with in courts of justice, and the most difficult of comprehension, is a perversion or derangement of the destruc- tive propensity. There are two forms of this, viz : 1. Pyromania or destruction by fire. Incendiarism. MENTAL ALIENATION. 507 On the European continent considerable attention has been devoted to this particular form of monomania, and several cases have there occurred in illustration of it. It has generally been found either excited by the ordinary causes of insanity, or by that constitutional disturbance which often accompanies the menstrual periods ; or it occurs about the age of puberty, and seems to be connected with retarded evolution of the sexual organs. Ray, 190. One of the first cases noticed was that of Maria Franc, a married woman of intemperate habits, who, from the moment of witnessing a burning building, felt a desire to fire houses which, upon drinking, became an irresistible impulse. This impulse was the only reason she could give. In other re- spects her mind was sound. Within five years she fired twelve houses, and was arrested and executed on the thirteenth attempt. In a village near Cologne, a girl of a quiet, inoffensive disposi- tion, and of exemplary character, made seven different attempts at incendiarism. When enquired of as to her motives, she shed tears, confessing that at certain periods she felt her reason for- sake her, and that then she was irresistibly impelled to the com- mission of a deed which, when done, she bitterly repented. She was acquitted of all criminal intentions. Guy's Principles of Fo- rensic Medicine, 312. In one instance given, the derangement was connected with imbecility. Sometimes this insane propensity has been found coupled with delusions, as in the instance reported by Platner, as quoted by Prichard on the Different Forms of Insanity, 14-1-5. This was a country girl, who twice attempted to set fire to a house. She said she was incited by a voice which continually commanded her to burn, and then destroy herself. The first burning she witnessed with calmness and delight ; the second, she gave an alarm, and attempted to hang herself. She had been subjected to a spasmodic disorder, which degenerated into fits resembling epilepsy. Another instance is the case of Jonathan Martin, who set fire to the cathedral church at York, and when accused of having stolen the golden fringe and other ornaments of the choir, de- 508 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. clared that he had no design to steal anything, but that an angel from God, having commanded him to set fire to the church, he wished to furnish himself with proof that he alone had commit- ted the act, and that no other person might bear the punish- ment. Prichard, 145 - 6 - 7. As this deranged propensity is frequently connected with, or proceeds from, the retarded evolution of the sexual organs, the age of the individual should be noticed, to determine whether it be about the age of puberty. So also the symptoms of irregular developement, and of marked critical movements, suc'.i as rapid increase of stature, small sexual development, uncommon lassi- tude and sense of weight and pain in the limbs, glandular swell- ings, and cutaneous eruptions, should all be carefully observed. Irregularity in the menstrual discharge may exert a strong in- fluence on the mental condition. Symptoms of disturbance in the circulating system, and also in the nervous, may indicate an arrest or delay in the development of the sexual functions. Ray, 195. 2. The second form of derangement of the destructive pro- pensity, is found where life is the object of it. This has two subdivisions : 1 . Self-destruction : Suicide, commonly called suicidal mono- mania. This, for legal purposes, is not so necessary to be inves- tigated as it once was. Still, it may occasionally be necessary^o settle the question whether the act of suicide really furnish evi- dence of mental alienation or not. With some, it is regarded as always the effect of insanity ; with others, as never the effect of it. The ancients seem very generally to have arrogated to them- selves the right to destroy their own lives, whenever, in their judgment, it should be proper. Pliny was accustomed to term it the greatest privilege the gods had left in the power of men amid the calamities of human life. Suicide was of very frequent occurrence in Eome ; and in China at the present time, where a mandarin falls into disgrace, he most commonly has recourse to self-destruction. Tins is no doubt frequently the result of moral depravity, as, for instance, where men of cultivated intellects and refined pas- MENTAL ALIENATION. 509 sions, put a period to their existence when they have derived from it all they can reasonably expect of sensual gratification. But in a very great number of cases, and Esquirol thinks in all, the suicidal act is the deed of a monomaniac, and results from a pathological change in the brain, or some part of it. In some cases, a morbid cautiousness may inspire a greater fear of the miseries of life than the evils of death. There have also occurred cases, where insane impulse has act- ed in this direction, and the individual has been led, in a man- ner unaccountable to himself, to attempt his own self-destruction. There are many circumstances going to show that it frequently originates from a deranged mind. One is, that although conside- rable forethought and ingenuity may have been evinced in pre- paring the means, yet when the attempt fails, in many cases, the individual, after his recovery, has either no recollection, or a very faint one, of the fact itself, receiving it upon the testimony of others. Another fact going to show its connection with insanity, is its hereditary character, and as Falret asserts, it is more hereditary than any other form of insanity. There are certainly many cases on record, showing it hereditary. Another feature which it possesses in common with other forms of mental' alienation, is the occasional exacerbations that are witnessed, when its symptoms, for a time, disappear, the clouds of melancholy seeming to vanish, and all appearances in- dicating a return to life and its enjoyments. Again the propen- sity will reappear, and generally in the end accomplish its pur- pose. Another fact tending to show its connection with mental de- rangement, is that it sometimes prevails epidemically, and is pro- pagated by sympathy. A soldier at the Hotel de Invalids hung himself on a post. His example was followed in a short time by twelve others, who hung themselves on the same post. On cut- ting down the post, the epidemic ceased. In 1793, no less than 1300 are said to have destroyed themselves in Versailles. In the French army, a grenadier killed himself. His example was followed by another, and it was feared it was assuming an 510 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. epidemic character. Napoleon, then First Consul, issued the fol- lowing order : " The grenadier Groblire has committed suicide, from a dis- appointment in love. He was in other respects a worthy man. This is the second event of the kind that has happened in this corps within a month. The First Consul directs that it shall be notified in the order of the day, that a soldier ought to know how to overcome the grief and melancholy of his passions ; that there is as much true courage in bearing mental afflictions man- fully, as in remaining unmoved under the fire of a battery. To abandon one's self to grief without resisting, and to kill one's, self in order to escape from it, is like abandoning the field of battle before being conquered !" This proved sufficient to check effectually the growing epi- demic. 2 American Journal of Insanity, 93. One additional fact may be mentioned, tending to identify this with insanity or other nervous diseases; and that is, that in many instances, the brain or abdominal viscera have been found, by examination after death, to have suffered organic lesions, the latter having affected the mind by sympathetic irritation. This has been found the fact where no indications of disease preceded the fatal act, or anything that would create a suspicion that any such act was intended. 2. The second form is homicide, (the destruction of others,) generally termed homicidal mania. This, at the present day, is a subject of immense interest throughout the civilized world. Here, in a most peculiar manner, and with most appaling results, is shown the amazing strength of insane impulse ; which by a pow- er and energy resistless as the fiat of God, impels the wretched bei?ig to destroy life, without a motive to actuate, or an end to be attained, or object to be accomplished. Individuals in the full possession of their usual powers of intellect, whose social and moral organization, to all appearance, remain unaffected, have imbrued their hands in the blood of the innocent, frequently in that of their own wives and children, simply because they felt that they must destroy. The records of insanity are full of such instances, and I am sorry to be compelled to add, that those of MENTAL ALIENATION 511 our srlminal courts of justice have too frequently shown, that those who could destroy without motive, and without a sane will, could, as their reward, be murdered under the fori is of law. The discovery of this form of partial moral mania, dates back only to the commencement of the present century. It was first distinctly described by Pinel. It is now very universally admit- ted by writers on Medical Jurisprudence. Ray, 198. It is remarked by Esquirol, that there are two forms of homi- cidal insanity. In one of these, the monomaniac is actuated by avowed motives, which are more or less irrational, and is gene- rally looked upon as mad. In the other, there are no motives acknowledged or discernible ; the individual being impelled by a blind, irresistible impulse. The first, being complicated with delusions or hallucinations, is only a form of partial intellectual mania. It is the last only that, in strictness, constitutes homici- dal mania ; although both these appear occasionally to be com- bined with each other. The recorded instances in which this form of derangement has displayed itself, are very numerous, as may be seen by re- ference to the works of Ray and Prichard on Insanity. All that can be introduced here, is simply sufficient to illustrate, to show the application of the principle. A carrier on the route between Untre Cobingen and Hussen- hofen met a woman, whom he struck several times with his hatchet, and left her lying in a ditch by the road-side. Next he encountered a lad thirteen years old, whose head he split open. Shortly after, he split the skull of a man thirty years old, and scattered his brains in the road ; and after hacking the body, left his hatchet and carriage, and proceeded unarmed towards Hus- senhofen. He next met two Jews on the road, whom he attack- ed, but who, after a short struggle, escaped him. Near Hussen- hbfen, he assaulted a peasant, whose cries brought several per- sons to his aid, by whom the maniac was seized and carried to Gemunde. They afterwards led him to the bodies of his victims, when he observed, " It was not I, but my bad spirit, that bas committed these murders." Ray, 200. 512 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. William Brown, in 1812, strangled a child whom he acciden- tal met one morning, while walking in the country. He took up the body and laid it on some steps, and then went and told what he had done, requesting to be taken into custody. He said he had never seen the child before ; had no malice against it, and could assign no motive for the dreadful act. He bore an exem- plary character, and had never been suspected of being insane. He was convicted and executed. In some cases of homicidal mania, the presence of some physi- cal or moral disorder may be detected j in others, not. Its ex- istence, however, is very possible, in cases where it has not been detected. Sometimes homicidal desires of the intensest kind will Hit through the mind of the perfectly sane, and while in the enjoyment of usual health. This form of mania has been known to occur in women, and seems connected with those constitutional changes produced by parturition, menstruation, and lactation. The victim selected is generally a young child. Several instances of this kind are given by Dr.* Ray. There are several cases in which the exciting cause is of a moral nature, and the unhappy subject feels under an imperious necessity of destroying life. Instances have not unfrequently occurred, in which were manifested deliberation and design, the act having been perpetrated under the most appalling circum- stances, with the utmost calmness and composure. The case of Henriette Cornier, which occurred in France, in 1825, is justly regarded as a leading case under this head. She was a female servant, aged twenty-seven years, of a mild and lively disposition, full of gaiety, and fond of children. In June, a change was observed, in her character. She became silent, melancholy, and sank into a kind of stupor. No cause of her dejection could be obtained from her. In September, she at- tempted to commit suicide, but was prevented. In October, she entered into the service of Madame Fournier, but was still melan- choly and desponding. No cause could be ascertained. She would talk only of her misfortune in losing her parents at an euly age, and of having received bad treatment from her MENTAL ALIENATION. 513 guardian. On the fourth of November, her mistress went out to walk, having previously told her to prepare dinner at the usual hour, and to go to a neighboring shop, kept by dame Belon, to buy some cheese. She had frequently been there, and maniflst- ed great fondness of Belon's little girl, about nineteen months old. On this occasion, displaying unusual fondness for it, she persuaded its mother to let her take it out with her to walk. She hastened back with the child to her mistress' house, and laying it across her own bed, severed its head from its body with a large kitchen knife. She subsequently declared she felt no particular emotion either of pleasure or of pain. She stated that shortly after, the sight of the horrible spectacle brought her to herself, and she experienced some emotions of fear, but they were of short duration. At the end of two hours, dame Belon came and enquired for her child, from the bottom of the stair-case. " Your child is dead," said Henriette. The mother went up stairs, and pushed forward into the chamber ; and at that moment, Cornier snatched up the head of the murdered child, and threw it into the street, from an open window. An alarm was raised ; the officers of justice, with others, came and found Henriette sitting on a chair near the body of the child, gazing at it, with the bloody knife by her, her hands and clothes covered with blood. She did not attempt to escape, nor did she deny the crime. She confessed all the circumstances, even her premeditated design, and the perfidy of her caresses. She displayed no emotion of remorse or grief, replying with indifference, " I intended to kill the child." She said she had no particular reason for it ; that the idea had taken possession of her mind : and that she was destined to do it. When asked why she threw the head into the street, she answered that it was for the purpose of attracting public at- tention, so that people might come up to her chamber, and see that she alone was guilty. This case, attended with these circumstances, presented great difficulty. The jury returned a very singular verdict, viz.: That she was guilty of " committing homicide voluntarily, but not with premeditation ;" and she was sentenced to hard labor for life. Ray, 215, et sea. 33 514 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. This case excited a great sensation in France ; and, what ia very remarkable, Esquirol states that six cases occurred within his own knowledge, immediately after it, showing the strange tendency to imitate acts of this atrocious character. Sometimes, as formerly stated, some motive is alleged, which, although well founded, is altogether inadequate. This is illus- trated in the case of Rabello, a Portuguese. He was employed as a mechanic in Litchfield county. His conduct had appeared singular, but inoffensive. One day, a little son of his employer, only twelve years old, accidentally stepped upon his toes; Ra- bello was exceedingly angry, and threatened the boy's life. The next day he appeared sullen, refused his food, and looked wild and malicious. The following morning, he went to the barn- yard with the boy, seized an axe, and killed him on the spot, mangling him in the most shocking manner. He went delibe- rately away from the house, but was soon overtaken by those in pursuit. He acknowledged that he had killed the boy, and gave as a reason, that he had stepped on his toes. It was found from the evidence produced at his trial, that this ivas an offence considered most heinous, and not to be forgiven. To test the reality of this, one of the physicians, while counting his pulse, stepped, apparently by accident, upon his toes. The pulse rose immediately forty strokes in a minute ; his counte- nance flushed up, and he appeared instantly in a rage. He was acquitted on the ground of insanity, and after the trial, it was ascertained that he had been previously deranged. Ray, 220-21. In some cases, religious fanaticism, and excitement of the re- ligious sentiments, have roused into activity the murderous pro- pensity. Pinel gives the instance of a vine-dresser, who thought himself commissioned to procure the eternal salvation of his family by killing them, or by the baptism of blood, as he call- ed it. He killed two of his children, when he was arrested and confined. Fourteen years after, he conceived the project of offering up an expiatory sacrifice, by killing all who might come within his reach, and actually wounded the keeper, and cut the throats of two other lunatics, before he could be arrested. MENTAL ALIENATION. 515 Sometimes the insane delusion is that he shall come to want ; and under the influence of that, he kills his family, and general- ly himself. As in the case of James Purington, who, under that apprehension, killed his wife and five of his children. See Ray, '222-3. In some cases, the desire to commit an atrocious act was ac- companied by a clear conception of its enormity, and a horror at the idea of its perpetration. The desire has been resisted and overcome, or a warning given to the person to escape. A young man, aged twenty-one years, was of a sombre disposition, lost his father at the age of fourteen, and never exhibited much affection towards his mother. At eighteen, his dejection increased; he shunned society, yet worked industri- ously, displaying no other sign of insanity than declaring that he felt a strong inclination to commit murder ; and there were mo- ments when he felt that he could feel pleasure in killing his sis- ter or mother. When the horrible nature of these suggestions were set before him, and their consequences, he exclaimed, " I am no longer master of myself." On several occasions, after hav- ing embraced his mother, his face became red, his eyes sparkled, and he cried out, " Mother, take care of yourself, I am forced to kill you !" On one occasion, he met a Swiss soldier in the street, who was a stranger to him ; he seized his sword, and made a sudden effort to take it from him and stab him. On another occasion, he found his mother in the cellar, and attempted to kill her with a bottle. For six months he was agitated with this impulse, slept little, complained of his head, and kept in solitude ; was insen- sible to the grief of his family, but exhibited in his discourse no sign of mental aberration. He was subsequently perfectly re- stored. A young lady experienced homicidal desires, for which she could assign no motive. She was rational on every subject, and whenever she felt the approach of this dreadful propensity, she shed tears, entreated to have the straight-waistcoat put on, and to be carefully guarded, till the paroxysm, which sometimes last- ed several days, had passed. Ray, 199 516 MEDICAL JURISPRUDEISXE. The numerous eases that have occurred, will, it is thought, justify the following general deductions, most of which are laid down substantially, by Dr. Ray, 224 - 5 : 1. In general, the criminal act has been preceded by, some physical disturbance, originating in the head, digestive system or uterus ; o£ by an irritable, gloomy, dejected or melancholy state : 2. The act will also generally be succeeded by the same, or more marked indications of disturbance of function, and having a more direct reference to derangement of mind, either wholly or partially : 3. The destructive impulse is strongly excited by the sight and proximity of murderous weapons ; by favorable opportuni- ties ; by contradiction, disgust, or some trivial or imaginary cir- cumstance : 4. The victims selected are either unknown or indifferent, or among his most loved and cherished objects, frequently children and offspring ; 5. Some deplore the propensity by which they are controlled, and beg to be restrained ; others conceal it ; others openly avow it, declare their murderous designs, and form schemes for their execution : 6. Some, after gratifying the destructive propensity, confess the act, and give themselves up to the authorities ; a few fly, and persist in denying the act : 7. Some interpose insanity in defence of their conduct, or as- sert their ignorance of the act ; while others deny that they la- bored under any such condition. Delirium. The organs of mind are not here primarily affect- ed They only sympathize with the general system, the state of high febrile excitement being propagated through the entire or- ganization, and affecting the brain in common with other organs. It rarely occurs in long protracted chronic diseases, such as can- cer, dropsy, or pulmonary consumption ; but except these, few diseases terminate in death without the subjects of them being more or less delirious, particularly near their close. Delirium may occur suddenly, but more commonly comes on MENTAL ALIENATION. 517 gradually, preceded by pain or throbbing in the head, heat, and ilushiDg of the cheeks. The patient at first talks during sleep, and is momentarily forgetful on waking. During the intervening period, his senses are collected. Gradually the delirium becomes more intense. The eyes are open, presenting a dull, listless look. He becomes regardless of persons and things around him, talk- ing to himself in a. low, muttering tone. His mind seems entire- ly occupied with past scenes and events, which occur without order or apparent connection, and to which the tongue gives ut- terance in broken and disjointed sentences. As the delirium becomes more deep and intense, the voice grows more indistinct ; the fingers pick at the bed-clothes, and there is a total incapacity of being roused to any further effort of attention. Sometimes the excitement is much more intense, and a higher degree of nervous symptoms. Ray, 296 - 7 ; Guy, 267. Many curious instances have occurred, in which, under the influence of delirium, words and ideas that had long lain dor- mant in the mind, and had become utterly forgotten, are recalled in all their original freshness. A patient in St. Thomas' Hospital, after receiving an injury of the head, and becoming delirious, was observed to speak a language that nobody could understand, but which at length was ascertained to be Welch. He was originally a Welshman, but had been from his native country about thirty years, during which he had entirely forgotten his native tongue, and acquired the English language. Ray, 297. Dr. Rush, see Diseases of the Mind, 282-3., mentions the fact that the old Swedes of Phila- delphia, when on their death-beds, would always pray in their naive tongue, although they had not spoken it for fifty or sixty years, and had probably forgotten it before they were sick. He quotes from Dr. Muhlenburgh the further observation that people generally pray, in their last hours, in their native language ; a fact which he had noticed in innumerable cases among his German hearers, although hardly one word of German was spo- ken by them in common life, and in days of health. A physi- cian who, in early life, had renounced the Roman Catholic faith, 518 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. in the delirium of a fever which preceded his death, prayed only in the forms of that church. These facts would seem to furnish some reason for entertaining the opinion, that nothing acquired by the mind is ever entirely lost, but that all its buried recollections may be rendered avail- able under some of its states or conditions. Delirium occasionally disappears a few days or hours before death, leaving the mind much enfeebled by disease, but in pos- session of its natural soundness. Delirium more closely resembles mania than any other mental state. Still, to the close observer, there is little danger of their being confounded with each other. Mania is an independent disease, while delirium is only a symptom of another disease, and" as such, is influenced or varied, as the disease diminishes or in creases in severity. The first seldom occurs until after puberty ; the second attacks all ages. In the first, persons and things are clearly recognized ; in the second, little attention is paid to things without. In the first, the patient reasons, although incorrectly ; in the second, there is an entire abolition of the reasoning power. In the first, the muscular power is not diminished, and quite fre-- quently is very much increased ; in the second, there is invaria- bly great muscular debility. In the first, sensation, both general and special, is most frequently unimpaired ; in the second, all these avenues to the understanding seem entirely closed. In the first, many of the bodily functions remain undisturbed ; in the second, every function suffers. Ray, 298 - 9. Somnambulism. There is an extensive class of mental manifes- tations hitherto unnoticed, that present many curious and inte- resting phenomena. In it are included spectral illusions, dream- ing, and somnambulism. The two first are unnecessary to be considered in connection with Medical Jurisprudence, and the third may perhaps be looked upon as more curious than useful. The power which the mental faculties occasionally manifest, of using, without being conscious of it, the voluntary muscles ; and even of possessing an intimate knowledge of the objects of per- ception around them, while the senses, or channels of sensation, thi ough which they are ordinarily admitted, are locked in slum- MENTAL ALIENATION. 519 bers as profound, for the time, as are those of the grave ; are problems in existence, which no eftort of human ingenuity has ever been found entirely capable of solving. The peculiarity that seems to pervade this class of cases, is, that a part or all the mental faculties are preternaturally active ; that they are in a state of exaltation, and hence morbid in their displays; and that the senses, or that which is equivalent to them, are in fact so modified as to adapt themselves to the state or condition of mind at the time prevailing. Hence the ear sometimes remains insensible to the loudest sound, and at others will catch, the slightest whisper. Such attention or inattention depends upon whether the sound is in harmony with what happens at the time to be passing within the mind. The somnambulist's senses of taste and smell are, at times, acute and accurate ; while at others, they are quite the reverse. Negretti, the Italian servant, did not distinguish between sea- soned cabbage and salad. He drank water instead of wine, which he had called for ; and snuffed ground coffee instead of snuff. The occasional greater acuteness of the senses during this state, may be owing to the fact, that the faculties having concen- trated their energies upon one object, are endowed with more and greater strength of perception. Another fact going to show that the mind is the all-powerful agent, is, that external objects are often transformed by it into the instruments which it then happens to have occasion for. Thus the somnambulist described by Hoffman, dreaming that he was about going on a journey, strided across the sill of an open window, kicking with his heels, and exerting his voice, as if he supposed himself riding on his horse. In some cases, vision, or some power analogous to it, seems to be exercised. Castelli was one night found translating Italian into French, and was observed to look for the words in a dic- tionary. His light having gone out, he found himself in the dark, groped about for a candle, and went into the kitchen to light it. He would also get up and go into his master's shop, and weigh out medicines for supposed customers. Another, a priest, would arise from his bed and compose ser 520 MEDICAL JT'RISpnUDEKCE. mons, reading over each page -when finished, and erasing and correcting with the utmost accuracy. Ray, 390-91. Another case seems to demonstrate the possession of the power of vision to an almost incredible extent. Jane Ridder was able, in a dark room, to make out the date of coins, the figures of which were nearly obliterated, and to read the motto of a seal, which others had been unable to decipher by the light of a lamp. With her eyes covered by several folds of handkerchief, she could still read and write as if nothing intervened, and play at backgammon understandingly. Ray, 391. The senses of hearing and taste are also much modified. But little attention is paid to what is taking place around them, un- less it happen to be connected with what is passing in their own minds. There is little doubt but that somnambulism is connected with a morbid condition of the system involving in it the organs of the mental faculties. Like mental alienation it is hereditary, showing its physical origin. As in the active forms of mania, there is sometimes a most remarkable exaltation of some of the faculties. Jane' Ridder would sing correctly, although she had never learned music, nor been known to sing when awake. She would also play at backgammon with considerable skill, though she had never learned the game in the waking state. She also evinced a power of imitation, of which she showed no trace while awake. Ray, 395. There are some very striking instances in which the sentiments and propensities of the somnambulist are exhibited in a remark- able degree of activity. A Carthusian monk, although very cor- rect and exemplary in his waking state, yet in his sleeping, was occasionally a thief, a robber, and a plunderer of the dead. A pious clergyman would in his sleep-walking steal, and even plunder his own church. A somnambulist in Maine was strongly disposed to commit suicide. He succeeded one night in escaping from the house, but an outcry being heard from a neighboring pasture, he was found suspended from the limb of a high tree. The rope was fortunately attached to his feet instead of his neck, so that very little injury was experienced, Ray, 395. MENTAL ALIENATION. 521 The psychological, as well as physiological facts, 'developed by the somnambulist, are of an exceedingly curious character. Some or all the mental faculties appear, during the paroxysm, to pos- sess an inherent power of acting independent of external in- fluences ; and they also, unconsciously to themselves in a differ- ent state, can bend in subserviency to their own purposes the material organization with which they are connected; and all this, unless we admit two separate and responsible states of being, is without will, motive, or responsibility. One of the interesting forms in this class of cases is what is termed ecstasis, or cataleptic somnambulism, in which this ex- altation of the faculties is coupled with a cataleptic affection. Ecstasis is defined to be a state in which certain ideas so com- pletely absorb the mind, that the external sensations are sus- pended, the voluntary movements arrested, and even the vital action retarded. In the paroxysms of cataleptic somnambulism, the patient appears in a deep quiet sleep, conversing with fluency and propriety, and evincing very often extraordinary activity of Litellect. What is the most remarkable fact connected with it i-, that after the paroxysm has passed off, no recollection remains o)' what was either said, done, thought, or felt, during its con- t ii aance ; but on its again recurring, the recollection of all that to( k place in previous paroxysms revives, but the memory of these events that transpired intermediate tiie paroxysms is lost. Thj individual thus has, in a manner, a two-fold existence ; the one being independent of the other ; and the idea of a double consciousness has been suggested, with the view of attempting to explain the strange phenomena presented. We cannot pro- bably expect, in the present state of our knowledge, a perfectly satislactory explanation. Drunkenness. This, including its sequel delirium tremens, is a state or condition of mind necessary to be examined on account of its legal consequences. The first effect of a psychological character, noticed after the drinking of alcoholic mixtures, is an increase in the power and activity of the mental faculties. The impulses furnished by the propensities are stronger ;. the emo- tions contributed by the sentiments more vivid ; and the ideas 522 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. originating from the intellect more brilliant. The inevitable consequence of this is a rapid expenditure of sensorial power, soon inducing a state of exhaustion. The faculties seem at first about equally affected by the stimu- lus. The balance, after a time, becomes lost. The high reflect- ing powers of intellect, together with the higher moral sentiments, become weak, imperfect, vacillating and finally temporarily par- alytic. The exhibitions continue to partake more and more strongly of the peculiar promptings of the propensities, and to become constantly more decidedly animal. This effect is owing not only to an increase in their strength, but also to the dimin- ished power and influence ordinarily exerted over them by the higher sentiments and powers of intellect. The effect of habitual and repeated inebriation, is to render the organs of mind continually less and less liable to be influenced by their ordinary, accustomed stimuli. That physical law which graduates organic action in accordance with the ordinary stimuli adapted to elicit it, is violated ; and the consequences of such violation can no more be avoided, than the author of that law can cease to be immutable. There is a striking uniformity between the peculiar effects of a single tit of intoxication, and the final results of a course and habit of inebriation, fully carried out. In both, the torpor and exhaustion are first manifested in the reflective faculties and the high moral powers. The intellectual grasp is impaired, and the power of originating moral distinctions, and of appreciating the nature and efficacy of moral forces, is very greatly diminished. The propensities in both cases, released from the restraint of that higher nature, become more energetic in their action. They seem actually improved and invigorated, as if deriving strength and energy by feeding on the corruptions of that moral death which has thrown its oblivious pall over the intellect and higher sentiments — like the worm, increasing from the consumption of its coffined banquet. An habitual indulgence in alcoholic drinks, by keeping up a constant irritation of the cerebral organs, results in permanently deranging their structure. The fibres become hardened, and MENTAL ALIENATION. 523 stjous effusions sometimes take place. Those pathological changes are effected, which, in turn, react upon the habit, ren- dering its bonds absolutely indissoluble. Hence the inebriate whose case is mentioned by Macnish, replied to the remonstrances of his friend, who painted the distresses of his family, the loss of Ms business and character, and the ruin of his health ; " my good friend, your remarks are just, they are indeed too true ; but / can no longer resist temptation. If a bottle of brandy stood at one hand, and the pit of hell yawned at the other, and I were con- vinced that I would be pushed in as sure as I took one glass, 1 could not refrain. You are very kind. I ought to be grateful for so many kind, good friends, but you may spare yourselves the trouble of trying to reform me ; the thing is out of the ques- tion." And the thing probably was out of the question. The habit had so vitiated the organs of mind; and the depraved organs had so reacted on the habit, that each had become bound to the other, by bonds that death only could sunder. Drunkenness is often periodical. Individuals are guilty of excesses at particular times, who are perfectly sober during the intermediate periods. Esquirol has noticed this periodicity in drunkenness, and whether continued or periodical, he treats it under the term dipsomania, attributing it to the influence of pa- thological changes in the brain. He, therefore, does not consider its unhappy victims as morally responsible. The craving of the stomach for strong drink he thinks imperious and irresistible. He insists that the unfortunate victims obey an impulse which they have not the power of resisting ; that they are true mono- maniacs ; and that if carefully observed, we should find in them all the characteristic features of partial madness. It has been remarked that it sometimes occurs in women at the turn of life, as a result of the important physiological changes which, at that period, take place in the female constitution. Ray, 425. There is a singular disease, to which the continued use of in- toxicating drinks very frequently leads, called delirium tremens or mania a potu. The delirium that here supervenes is not at first constant, but becomes so after a few days ; and constitutes 524 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. the most prominent feature of the disease. This is not the de- lirium of a fever, because no sufficient febrile symptoms are present. It is distinguished from mania by the previous history of the individual, and the peculiar symptoms of the disorder. The delirium bears a strong resemblance to dreaming. It seems as if dreams were mistaken for realities. The patient is suspicious, mistrustful, and subject to constant fears, alarms, and apprehensions. One of the most common hal- lucinations is, that he is constantly seeing devils, snakes, vermin, and all manner of offensive and unclean things around him ; and 'peopling every nook and comer of his apartment with these loathsome objects. The extreme terror which these delusions often inspire, produces in the countenance an unutterable expres- sion of anguish, and, in the hope of escaping from his fancied tormentors, the wretched patient often endeavors to cut his own throat, or resort to some other mode of self-destruction. Although generally tractable, and not inclined to be mischievous, yet, under the influence of these terrible apprehensions, he sometimes mur- ders his wife or attendant, whom his disordered imagination identifies with his enemies. After perpetrating an act of this kind, he generally gives some illusive reason for his conduct, re- joicing in his success, and expressing regret at not having done it before. The tremor from which this form of delirium is named, is rarely altogether absent, and where present, is very characteristic. Legal Applications ; or the Legal Consequences which at- tach TO THE DIFFERENT FORMS OF MENTAL ALIENATION. Having examined the different forms of mental alienation, or unsoundness of mind, and endeavored so to define and describe each form, as to lead to its clear identification whenever it oc- curs, the next object is to make the application to them of the legal principles which human wisdom has devised, and human prudence adopted, with the view both of saving the insane from the consequences of their own actions, at the same time that a sufficient protection is thrown over the community in which they reside. It should here be remarked, however, that the different forms under which mental alienation has been considered, have MENTAL ALIENATION. 5C5 been adopted from mere convenience, and as presenting a means of more thoroughly understanding, and clearly explaining, the extremely tangled web of mental alienation. The law seeks only to know whether there exists, in any given case, unsoundness of mind. Whether that unsoundness proceeds from preternatural defect, indicated by idiocy, imbecility, or dementia, or from ex- alted and perverted action of the faculties, as in the active forms of mania, is to it not of the slightest consequence. Whether the unsoundness exists, and is sufficient to absolve from liability, are all it seeks to know. Such, however, is now the extent of know- ledge within the reach of the medical jurist on this subject, that neither courts nor juries could have much confidence in his tes- timony, unless he could designate the forms under which mental alienation presents itself, and describe that then under considera- tion. The law, it is true, as we have already seen, does recognize two forms, viz., idiocy and lunacy ; intending, undoubtedly, to include under them the two great divisions of mental alienation, the one originating from preternatural defect, and the other from excess and perverted action of the intellectual and moral powers. , Under the term unsoundness of mind, may be included all that cannot come in under idiocy and lunacy. We have already noticed the principle upon which exemption from liability proceeds ; the division recognized by the law ; the occasions in which it interferes ; and the general means or methods by which its interferences are effected. Before proceed- ing to notice the legal consequences which attach to the different forms of unsoundness of mind, it may be proper to direct the attention to a few general considerations. The presumption of law is always prima facie in favor of sanity. Whenever, therefore, exemption from liability is claimed, on the ground of mental unsoundness, it devolves on the party claiming to allege and prove it. That allegation and proof being furnished, the legal presumption changes, and the mental un soundness is presumed to continue, until the allegation and proof of a complete restoration, or a lucid interval. This latter is so 526 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. frequently made the subject of discussion in courts of law and equity, that some attention should be devoted to it. . Lucid Iintervals once formed much more prominent subjects of inquiry than they do at present. Even the term lunacy ori- ginated from a supposed connexion of mania, and its intermis- sions, with the changes of the moon. At the present time, the ' medical profession do not appear to attach so much importance to lucid intervals. Mr. Haslam declares that, "as a constant observer of this disease, for more than twenty-five years, he cannot affirm that the lunatics, with whom he had daily inter- course, have manifested alternations of insanity and reason." On the other hand, Esquirol, who also states facts from personal observation, fully recognizes the existence of insanity with lucid intervals, and identifies it with what others have termed " re- current," and with what he terms "intermittent insanity." The mania, says Fodere, which is accompanied by fury, is very often periodical. Georget speaks of lucid intervals as returns to reason ; but says, that patients in this state have some distur- bance of their ideas, and weakness of mind, impairing their power of attention. Dr. Combe in his Observations on Mental Derange- ment, 2 Vol., insists that the patient, however calm and rational he may appear, is, nevertheless not in as perfect possession of his senses as if he had never been ill. That although in ordinary excitement, and under ordinary circumstances, his perceptions may be accurate, and his judgment sound, yet a degree of irri- tability of brain still remains behind, which renders him unable to withstand any unusual emotion, any sudden provocation, or any unexpected and pressing emergency. This will, probably, ex- press the general views of the medical profession in reference to lucid intervals. The next and most important inquiry is what the law regards as a lucid interval. D'Aguesceau, in his pleading in the case of the Abbe d'Orleans, see Evans' Pothier on Obligations, Appendix, 579, says, " It must not be a superficial tranquility, a shadow of repose ; but, on the contrary, a profound tranquility, a real re pose. It must be, not a mere ray of reason, which only makes its absence more apparent when it is gone — not a flash of light- MENTAL ALIENATION. 527 niag, which pierces through the darkness only to render it more gloomy and dismal — not a glimmering which joins the night to the day — but a perfect light, a lively and continued lustre, a full and entire day, interposed between the two separate nights, of the fury which precedes and follows it. And, to use another image, it is not a deceitful and faithless stillness which follows or forebodes a storm, but a sure and stedfast tranquility for a time, a real calm, a perfect serenity ; in fine, without looking for so many metaphors to represent our idea, it must be, not a mere diminution, a remission of the complaint, but a kind of temporary cure, an intermission so clearly marked, as in every respect to resemble the restoration of health." These same views substantially seem to have been early adopted by the Court of Chancery in England. In The Attorney-General vs. Parnthier, 3 Brovm's ch. Cases, 234, Lord Thurlow says, " By a perfect interval, I do not mean a cooler moment, an abatement of pain or violence, or of a higher state of torture — a mind re lieved from excessive pressure; but an interval in which the mind, having thrown off the disease, had recovered its general habit." In regard to the continuance of a lucid interval, D. Aguesceau 1'urther remarks, that " as it is impossible to judge in a moment of the quality of an interval, it is requisite that there should be a sufficient length of time for giving a perfect assurance of the temporary re-establishment of reason, which it is not possible to define in general, and which depends upon the different kinds of fury ; but, it is certain, there must be a time, and a considerable time, that an action may be sensible in appearance, without the author of it being sensible in fact ; but an interval cannot be per- fect, unless you can conclude from it that the person in whom it appears is in a state of sanity ; the action is only a rapid and momentary effect, the interval continues and supports itself ; the action only marks a single fact, the interval is a state composed of a succession of actions. Its duration must be sufficiently long to admit a judgment of its reality. Nothing can be more distin- guishable than a reasonable action and an interval. The one is an act, the other a state ; the act of reason may subsist with the 528 MEDICAL JUKISPEUDENCE. habit of madness ; and, if it were not so, a state of folly cou'd never be proved." So, also, in the case before referred to, Lord Thurlow says, " that the evidence in support of a lucid interval, after derange ment at any period has been established, should be as strong and demonstrative of such fact as where the object of the proof is to establish derangement. The evidence, in such a case, applying to stated intervals, ought to go to the sta,te and habit of the per- son, and not to the accidental interview of an individual, or to the degree of self-possession in any particular act." The courts of law and equity, in their subsequent decisions, have not essentially modified the rule as above laid down. In the English Ecclesiastical Courts, the rule has, in some instances, been very much relaxed, the disposition having been always strongly manifested to sustain the validity of last wills and testa- ments, when their provisions were reasonable. Perhaps, the strongest case is that of Cartwright vs. Cartwright, 1 Philli- moreJs Rep., 90, in which a will was contested on the ground of insanity in the testatrix. The woman, both before and subse- quent to the making the will, was afflicted with many of the worst symptoms of mania. For some time previous to its date, she was very importunate for the use of pen, ink, and paper, which were withheld from her by the direction of her physician. He at length consented, in order to quiet and pacify her. They were brought to her, and her hands, which had been constantly tied, were unloosed, and she sat down to a bureau to write. She wrote on several pieces of paper in succession, which she tore up and threw into the grate, walking up and down the room in a wild and ferocious manner, and muttering to herself. After spending some time in this manner, she finally wrote a will that suited her, and which occupied but a few lines. Under these circumstances, the court, Sir William Wynne, decided that she had a lucid interval at the time of making the will, which, for that reason, was established as valid. The grounds were, that the will made a natural and consistent distribution of her pro- perty ; that it " was a rational act, rationally done," and hence the inference was, that her mind was visited with a lucid inter- MENTAL ALIENATION. 529 val at the moment of making it. The court distinctly took the ground that the act itself afforded the strongest and best proof of the existence of the interval. This principle has not been affirmed by subsequent decisions, although a strong tendency has ever existed to infer capacity from the nature and quality of the act done. In White vs. Driver 1 Phil., 84, a greater amount of proof was required to establish the fact of a lucid interval ; and in that of Groom and Thomas vs. Thomas and Thomas, 2 Hagg's Eccl. Rep., 433, the court, Sir John Nicholl, laid down the doctrine, that where there is not actual recovery, and a return to the management of himself and his concerns, by the unfortunate individual, the proof of a lucid in- terval is extremely difficult. When the sanity is confessedly of a doubtful character, the agent may be inferred rational from the character, broadly taken, of his act. Scruby and Finch vs. Fordham, 1 Addam?s Eccl. Re- port, 74. While the law restores to the insane his civil responsibility during a lucid interval, it is much more cautious in restoring his responsibility for crimes. For this caution there are sound phy- siological reasons. Crimes are usually the results of momentary excitement, produced by sudden provocations. These provoca- tions re-produce that pathological condition of the brain called irritation, the essential cause of the mental derangement. The temporary cure, therefore, that constituted the lucid interval, is put an end to, and the diseased condition of the brain is again resumed. In the earlier periods of the law, a distinction was made be- tween acts done by those of unsound mind in pais, as it is termed, and those done in courts of record. The latter, such as fines and recoveries, and declarations of their uses, were not voidable, be- cause it was presumed that had they been under these disabilities, the judges would not have admitted them to make these acknow- ledgments. There was, besides, another reason, viz. : The law could allow no averment against the verity of a record ; a record, as Lord Coke observes, importing such absolute verity, that Lt is always proved by the production of itself. 34 530 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. The acts done in pais could be avoided by heirs and personal representatives, but not by the individual himself. The reason assigned was, that " no man should be allowed to disable himself, for the insecurity that may arise in contracts from counterfeit madness and folly. Besides, if the excuse were real, it would be repugnant that the party should know or remember what he did in such a state." This doctrine is now entirely exploded. In 3 Bay's Rep., 90, it was held that a man might show he was non compos mentis in avoidance of his deed. Judge Story, in 1 Story's Equity Juris- prudence, § 225, remarks, in reference to the early doctrine, that K it is matter of wonder and humiliation, how so absurd and mis- chievous a maxim could have found its way into any system of jurisprudence professing to act on civilized beings." The case of Bagster and Others vs. Portsmouth, 7 Bowling and Ryland, 614, establishes the principle, that, in the absence of all fraud and imposition, and where the goods supplied appear to be suitable to the condition and degree of the party receiving them, and which, in his ordinary habits of life, he would be likely to require, the fact of his being of unsound mind, and legally inca- pable of making his own contracts, would not deprive a trades- man of his right of suing in a court of law for the value of the goods for which he had given him credit. The great difficulty is referred to of being able to discriminate, at first view, between a person of sound and of unsound mind. It may be as well to examine, in this connexion, the progress of the law in relation to the criminal responsibility of the insane. There are here two anomalies that strike us in the outset. The one is that a different rule or principle of responsibility should be established between civil and criminal acts; that _ the same degree of incapacity should be exonerated from the civil, and yet held responsible for the criminal conduct. This seems to have been successfully claimed and maintained by^ the Attorney- General of England, in the case of Bellingham, in 1812, and had previously to that been conceded by Lord Erskine, on the trial of Hadfield, in 1800. The concession of Lord Erskine went even beyond what the law requires, as he admitted that a civil act MENTAL ALIENATION 531 might be avoided, even although it were not connected with the delusion which constituted the insanity. But to establish the doctrine, that a capacity so diminished or deranged from disease of the organ, as is sufficient to exempt from liability for civil acts, should, nevertheless, be held responsible for those that are crimi- nal, appears strange and unaccountable. Criminal acts, which are usually consequent upon undue excitement, are much more likely to spring from minds just on the verge of derangement, than civil acts, which seem more to follow each other in the ordinary natural course of things. Why, then, should an individual be divested of his property, and absolved from all his civil liabilities incurred while in that state, and yet be held to the utmost degree of accountability for all aggressions upon liberty or life 1 There appears to be no reason, physiological or psycho- logical, for making this distinction. Another anomaly is in the character of the evidence adduced to prove capacity or incapacity. When the capacity for the per- formance of a civil act is testing, the nature and character of the act itself is insisted upon as furnishing some proof either of the capacity or incapacity of the person performing it. " A rational act, rationally done," raises, at least, a presumption, that .its source may be rational. So, also, an irrational act, irrationally done, affords a like presumption of incapacity. Does the same rule obtain in acts that are criminal 1 A man imbrues his hands in the blood of his own family, or, as in the case of Freeman, hereafter alluded to, destroys the lives of an entire family that had done him no injury. Instead of its being regarded as an insane act, the individual is more frequently looked upon as a monster of iniquity, who can hardly find a parallel in the records of crime. It cannot, perhaps, be said that the law itself, in direct terms, affixes to these acts these different characters, as it no where lays down distinctly such a principle. The objection is, that causes are generally conducted, and permitted to go to juries, upon these principles. The principles that serve as a guide in determining the capa- city or incapacity in relation to civil responsibilities, are either totally inapplicable, or stop far short of exonerating from crimi- OoZ MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. rial acts. It becomes then a matter of anxious inquiry what are the tests of capacity or incapacity, and what are the principles that lie at the foundation of irresponsibility for crimes. These have furnished more or less of a puzzle to courts, from the days of Lord Hale to the present time. The earliest attempt worthy of notice to define these tests and principles was made by Lord Hale. In his Pleas of the Crevm., 39, he says, " There is a partial insanity and a total insanity. The former is either in respect to things quoad hoc vel illud insanize. Some persons that have a competent use of reason, in respect of some subjects, are yet under a peculiar dementia in respect of some particular discourses, subjects, or applications ; or else it is partial, in respect of degrees ; and this is the condi- tion of very many, especially melancholy persons, who, for the most part, discover their defect in excessive fears and griefs, and yet are not wholly destitute of the use of reason ; and this partial insanity seems not to excuse them in the committing of any offence for its matter capital, for, doubtless, most persons that are felons of themselves and others, are under a degree of partial insanity, when they commit these offences. It is very difficult to define the invisible line that divides perfect and partial insanity ; but it must rest upon circumstances, duly to be weighed and considered by the judge and jury, lest, on the one side, there be a kind of inhumanity towards the defects of human nature, or, on the other, too great an indulgence given to great crimes." Again, as a measure of responsibility, he says, " Such a person, as laboring under melancholy distempers, hath yet ordinarily as great understanding as ordinarily a child of fourteen years hath, is such a person as may be guilty of treason or felony." This goes clearly to show that, in the opinion of that learned judge, it is the strength and capacity of the mind only that are affected by insanity ; and hence he attributes to " melancholy distempers," the power of diminishing, instead of perverting and deranging, the action of the mental faculties. It is not strange that such doc- trines should have been laid down in the infancy of knowledge even of the most common forms of mental alienation ; but it is somewhat singular that they should be so long adhered to, either MEKTAL ALIENATION. 533 in letter or spirit, amid the constantly increasing lights which have emanated from the medical profession in reference to this dark and mysterious subject. This doctrine of Lord Hale has had a prodigious effect upon all subsequent jurisprudence in reference to this condition of mind. It is, perhaps, more in the constructions given to it, than in the doctrine itself, that the objectionable features are to be found. The first echo to this doctrine is found in the trial of Arnold, for shooting at Lord Onslow, in 1723; see 8 Margrave's State Trials, 322. Arnold was a weak, idle being, strange, and some- times mad ; leading an irregular, disordered life ; living solitary ; lying about in barns and under hay-ricks ; cursing, swearing, laughing, and throwing tilings about, and disturbed in his sleep by fancied noises. Lord Onslow lived in the neighborhood, and was believed by him to be the cause of all the tumults, distur- bances and wicked devices that happened in the country.' He declared that he sent his devils and imps into his room at night to disturb his rest, and that he constantly plagued and bewitched him, by getting into his belly or bosom, so that he could neither eat, drink, nor sleep for him. He said much about being plagued by the' Bollies or Bolleroys, declaring it was better to die than live so miserably. Under the influence of these delusions, he shot at and wounded Lord Onslow. In this case, Mr. Justice Tracy laid down the law to be, " that it is not every kind of frantic humor, or something unaccount- able in a man's actions, that points him out to be such a madman as is exempted from punishment ; it must be a man that is totally deprived of Ms understanding and memory, and doth not know what he is doing no more than an infant, than a brute, or a wild beast. Such an one is never the object of punishment." And I think all would agree that such an one never should be the object of pun- ishment. This would define a state, if possible, below the idiotic. This rule wbuld leave every other but the lowest in the scale of idiocy, fully possessed of all the elements of responsibility. The result was that the jury found him guilty, and he was sentenced to be hung. Lord Onslow, however, was convinced of his ir- 53-1 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. responsibility, and on liis application, the sentence was not ex- ecuted, and he was continued in prison during his life. On the strength of this case, it might fairly be assumed that the law, in order to exempt the insane from criminal responsibility, required an entire destitution of intellect, an absolute depriva- tion of reason. This ground was met, and completely over- thrown, by Lord Erskine, in the case of Rex vs. Hadf,eld : in the year 1800. He very justly remarks that if a total deprivation of memory was to be taken in its literal sense, then no such mad- ness ever existed in the world. That it is idiocy alone which places a man in this helpless condition ; but that lunatics have not only had memory, in his sense of the expression, — they have not only had the most perfect knowledge and recollection of all the relations they stood in towards others ; and of the acts and circumstances of their lives, — but have, in general, been remark- able for subtlety and acuteness. The trial of Hadfield took place in the King's Bench, before Lord Kenyon, in 1800, and is fully reported in 27 Howell's State Trials, 1281. He was indicted for high treason in shooting at the King in Drury Lane Theatre. The defence interposed was insanity. .He had been a soldier, received many severe wounds in the battle near Lisle, and was dismissed from the army on account of insanity, or partial derangement, caused by those wounds. He was afterwards subject to an annual insanity from the beginning of spring to the end of dog days. He had been confined as a lunatic. When affected by the disorder he im- agined himself to hold intercourse with God, sometimes calling himself God, or Jesus Christ, and other blasphemous expressions, committing acts of the greatest extravagance, but at other times appearing rational, and discovering no symptoms of mental in- capacity or disorder. The offence was committed on the 15th of May. On the 1 1th of May next preceding, his mind was very much disordered, and he used many blasphemous expressions. At two o'clock A. M., on the following morning, hcjumped sud- denly out of bed, said he was about to dash out, against the bed- post, the brains of his little son, about eight years old, of whom he was remarkably fond, and that God had ordered him to do so MENTAL ALIENATION. 535 On the same and the following day, he used many incoherent and blasphemous expressions. On the morning of the 15th he was worse, went to his master's work-shop, returned to dinner at two, but said he stood in no need of meat and could live without it. In the evening, after repeating his irreligious expressions, he went out and repaired to the theatre. He sat there nearly three-quarters of an hour, when the King entered. As the au- dience rose up to receive him, he got above the rest, and, pre- senting a pistol loaded with slugs, fired it at the King's person, and then let it drop. This situation was favorable, and he took deliberate aim at the King. When apprehended he said he knew perfectly well his life was forfeited, that he was tired of life, and regretted nothing but the fate of a woman who was his wife, and would be his wife a few days longer, he supposed. He spoke calmly, and without any apparent derangement ; said he did not intend any thing against the life of the King, that he knew the attempt only would answer his purpose, repeated that he was tired of life, and that his plan was to get rid of it by other means. These were the most material facts bearing on the subject. On this occasion Lord Erskine brought his great talents to bear directly upon the subject of insanity, and with a felicity of ex- pression peculiarly his own, exhibited in bold relief some of its leading and prominent features. The grounds he took and en- forced, and in which the court acquiesced, were substantially — 1 . That it is the reason of man which makes him accountable for his actions, and that the deprivation of reason acquits hirn of crime : 2. That it is unnecessary that reason should be entirely sub- verted, or driven from her seat, but that it is sufficient if dis- traction sits down upon it along with her, holds her trembling hand upon it, and frightens her from her propriety : 3. That the law will not measure the sizes of men's capacities, so as they be compos mentis : 4. That there is a difference between civil and criminal re sponsibility. That a man affected by insanity is responsible foi his criminal acts where he is not for his civil : 535 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. 5. That a total deprivation of memory and understanding is not required to constitute insanity : 6. The then new and all important ground, that the individual is irresponsible where the insanity consists in hallucination ; where the disease springs directly from the delusive sources of thought ; and all their deductions, within the scope of the malady, are founded upon the immoveable assumption of matters as real- ities, either without any foundation whatever, or so distorted and disfigured by fancy, as to be almost nearly the same thing as their creation : '7. That the act complained of, and sought to be avoided, must be the immediate unqualified offspring of the disease. Although there are some concessions contained in the doctrine that cannot now be admitted as correct, yet, on the whole, the. speech and the case itself was a splendid triumph of reason over prejudice and error. Its great merit consists in showing that insanity is not idiocy ; and in extending the protection of the law, as well to embrace the delusions of the one, as the intellect- ual destitution of the other. The result was the acquittal of the prisoner. After this clear, and it would appear, satisfactory exposition and settlement of the law as applicable to insanity, it is painful to advert to the case of Bellingham, 1 Collinson on Lunacy, 650, which occurred only twelve years after. He was tried for the murder of the Honorable Spencer Perci- val, in 1812. He appears to have labored under many insane delusions. The principal of these were that his own private grievances were national wrongs ; that his country's diplomatic agents abroad neglected to hear his complaints and assist him in his troubles ; that his losses would be made good by the govern- ment ; that the government would not interfere in his affairs ; and he determined, by assassinating its head, to bring his affairs before the country, supposing then he would have an opportu- nity of making a public statement of his grievances, and of ob- taining a triumph over the attorney-general. These were all delusions, and under their influence he shot the prime minister, Spencer Percival. MENTAL ALIENATION. 537 In this case Lord Mansfield charged the jury in substance, that the single question for them to determine was whether, when he committed the offence charged upon him. he had sufficient understanding to distinguish good from evil, right from wrong, and that murder was a crime not only against the law of God, but against the law of his country. He was convicted and exe- cuted. In this case the test assumed as the only one, was the power of distinguishing good from evil, right from wrong. And this, or more definitely, the power of distinguishing right from wrong, has ever since been adopted as a test, and sometimes as the only one, that marks the line between sanity and insanity, responsibility and irresponsibility. This test was adopted only twelve years after Lord Erskine's exposure of its entire fallacy as an exclusive test, in his great speech on the trial of Hadfield. He makes the supposition that the character of an insane delusion consisted in the belief that some given person was any brute animal, or an inanimate being, (such cases having existed) ; and that on a trial for murder, it should be made to appear, that he firmly be- lieved the man he had destroyed was a potter's vessel, his mind in every other respect being sane. Then suppose further, that he believed the man whom he destroyed, but whom he destroyed as a potter's vessel, to be the property of another, and that other his enemy, whom he had sought to injure by this destruction of his property. As tins may now be regarded as the test best known to the law, it may be important to enquire as to the elements that com- pose it, and what effect they exert upon the insane mind. The knowledge of right and wrong implies two tilings : 1. A perception or recognition, by the mind, of those actions or things, in themselves or others, in regard to which right or wrong may be predicated : and, 2. The feeling of what is right or wrong, in itself, in reference to such actions or things. •The first belongs to the intellectual department, the second to mat of feeling. The first consequently depends upon the action Alt' those perceptive faculties that take cognizance of actions and 538 MEDICAL jrKISPRUDENCE. things ; the second upon the faculty of conscientiousness, the moral sense of the metaphysicians. To enable one to judge of the moral qualities of actions and things, both these are neces- sary. Both are susceptible of cultivation and improvement. Both may exist together, or be wanting together, or the one may exist without the other. The one does exist without the other in the brute creation. They perceive actions and things, but feel not their moral relations. They are utterly unable to dis- tinguish, between an injury and a wrong, between a blow that is accidental, and one that is intentional. •With us, the one may be so much wanting, from original de- fect, or subsequent occurring disease, as to divest of the elements of responsibility ; or the intellectual faculties may be so warped or perverted by insane delusions, as to deprive the other of all power of exerting its agency in reference to those acts or things involved in the delusion. Dr. Eay, whose long experience with the insane enables him to speak from observation, thus eloquently remarks : " In no school of logic, in no assembly of the just, can we listen to closer and shrewder argumentations, to warmer exhorta- tions to duty, to more glowing descriptions of the beauty of virtue, or more indignant denunciations of evil doing, than in the hospitals and asylums for the insane. And yet many of these 1 very people may make no secret of entertaining notions utterly subversive of all moral propriety, and perhaps are only waiting a favorable opportunity to execute some project of wild and cruel violence. The purest minds cannot express greater horror and loathing of various crimes, than madmen often do, and from precisely the same causes. Their abstract conceptions of crime, not being perverted by the influence of disease, presents its hideous outlines as strongly defined as they ever were in the healthiest condition ; and the disapprobation they express at the sight, arises from sincere and honest convictions. The particular criminal act, however, becomes divorced, in their minds, from its relations to crime in the abstract; and, being regarded only in connexion with some favorite object, which it may help to ob- tain, and which they see no reason to refrain from pursuing, is MENTAL ALIENATION. 539 viewed, in fact, as of a highly laudable and meritorious nature. Herein, then, consists their insanity ; not in preferring vice to virtue, in applauding crime and deriding justice, but in being unable to discern the essential identity of nature, between a par- ticular crime and all other crimes, whereby they are led to ap- prove, what, in general terms, they have already condemned." Ray, 289, § 17. In confirmation of these views, Baron Hume, a Scotch writer, speaking in reference to this test, says, that " every judgment in the matter of right and wrong, supposes a case, or state of facts to which it applies, and though the person may have that ves- tige of reason, which may enable him to answer in the general, that murder is a crime, yet if he cannot distinguish a friend from an enemy, or a benefit from an injury, but conceives everything about him to be the reverse of what it really is, and mistakes the ideas of his fancy in that respect, for realities, those remains of intellect are of no sort of service to him in the government of his actions, in enabling him to form a judgment as to what is right or wrong on any particular occasion." Although there are conflicting decisions upon this point, yet it may on the whole fairly be assumed, that an advance has been made by the law in this respect ; that the enquiry is not limited to the ideas of right and wrong entertained by the prisoner, in the general or abstract, but is to be made in reference to the identical act complained of as criminal. Mr. Chitty, in Chitty's Medical Jurisprudence, 354, says : " In practice, to prevent the jury being embarrassed by any techni- calities respecting the import of this term insane, the substantial question presented to the jury in this and all cases, whether of alleged idiocy, lunacy, or insanity, either in general or mono- mania (that is, delusion confined to a particular subject,) is, whether, at the time the alleged criminal act was committed, the prisoner was incapable of judging between right and wrong, and did not then know he was committing an offence against the law of God and of nature 1 " In the case of The King vs. Bowler, which occurred in 1S12, (1 Collinson on Lunacy, 673,) the defence interposed was insanity. 540 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. Mr. Justice Le Blanc, in that case, charged the" jury, that it was for them to determine whether the prisoner, when he commit- ted the offence with which he stood charged, was incapable of distinguishing right from wrong, and not under the influence of any illusion in respect to the prosecutor, which rendered his mind at the moment insensible to the nature of the act he was about to commit ; since, in that case, he would not be legally re- sponsible for his conduct. But if they should be of opinion that when he committed the offence, he was capable of distinguish- ing right from wrong, and not under the influence of such an illusion as disabled him from discerning that he was doing a wroug act, he would be amenable to the justice of Ms country, and guilty in the eye of the law. The late case of The King vs. Orford, (5 Carrington # Payne, ] 68,) was a trial for the murder of a man named Chisnall. The defence was insanity, evidenced by delusion. He labored under the delusion that the inhabitants of Hadleigh, and particularly the deceased, were continually issuing warrants against him, with intent to deprive him of liberty and life. Under the influence of that insane idea, he would frequently abuse persons whom he met in the street, and with whom he never had any dealings or acquaintance of any kind. In his waistcoat pocket a paper was found, headed " List of Hadleigh conspirators against my life." The name of the deceased was among them. There was also found among his papers, an old summons, about a rate, at the foot of which he had written, " This is the beginning of an attempt against my life." In this case, Lord Lyndhurst charged the jury, that they must be satisfied, before they could acquit the prisoner on the ground of insanity, that he did not know, when he committed the act, what the effect of it, if fatal, would be, with reference to the crime of murder. The question was, Did he know that he wa? committing an offence against the laws of God and nature ? The prisoner was acquitted on the ground of insanity. The language of courts, in reference to this test, is always more or less ambiguous, arising from the fact, that the feeling of right and wrong may, and more generally does, prevail, amid the MENTAL ALIENATION, i 541 most unfounded delusions. Whether, therefore, the courts have reference simply to the feelings and the laicwledge consequent upon it, or to its being exercised in reference to things as they actually exist, or as any sane mind would understand them to exist, may make a most material difference. The latter might be a proper test of insanity, but the former would by no means be necessarily so. If the verdicts rendered by juries are to be received as evidence of the construction put upon the charge, they will generally fa- vor the idea that their action has been upon the former. Another test proposed, and upon which considerable reliance has at times been placed, is the design or contrivance manifested in the commission of the act. Mr. Russell (1 Russell on Crimes and Misdemeanors, 13,) lays this down as one of the established principles that are to guide us in our conclusions on this subject. In the case of Arnold, great stress was laid on the fact of his having purchased shot of a much larger size than he usually did when he went out to shoot, with the design, then formed, of committing the murder he afterwards attempted. In the case of Bellingham, the Attorney General declared, that " even if insanity in all his other acts had been manifest, yet the systematic correctness with which the prisoner contrived the mur- der, showed that he possessed a mind, at the time, capable of distinguishing right from wrong." It would probably have been very difficult for the Attorney General to have shown how the one was connected with the other; the real connection being about the same as that which exists between the motion of a muscle and the secretion of a gland in the living subject. The sufficiency of this as a test, can be best settled by referring to the opinions of those who have a practical acquaintance with the in- sane. " What," says Br. Ray, page 37, § 21, "must be thought of the attainments of those learned authorities in the study of mad- ness, who see in the power of systematic design a disproof of the, existence of insanity, when, from the humblest menial in the service of a lunatic asylum, they might have heard of the in- 542 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. genuity of contrivance, and adroitness of execution, that pre- eminently characterize the plans of the insane V This power of systematic design is, when analyzed, nothing but the sentiment of cunning developing itself by means of intellectual combinations. The sentiment itself is a primitive power or fa- culty of the mind, and is of a low order, in fact, a mere animal instinct, being found in the brute creation. It is one of those powers that are generally found specially active among the in- sane. Very extraordinary instances are given, in works on in- sanity, going to show the very great extent to which this faculty has developed itself among that unfortunate class of individuals. See iJcM/,39-40, §21. Independent of its being generally affected in connection with other powers of the mind, the fact of its being a primitive power or faculty, independent in its function and action, renders it liable itself to deranged manifestation ; and in that case, accord- ing to this doctrine, we should have the actual derangement of one faculty cited as proof of the sanity of the entire mind. So far as relates to its displaying itself through intellectual combi- nations, or the exercise of those faculties that adapt means to ends, we have the instance given by Pinel of the maniac who endeavored to discover perpetual motion, and in his efforts to discover it, constructed some very curious machines. Also in the one mentioned by Esquirol, of the mad general who invent- ed an improvement in the construction of a military weapon, which was subsequently adopted in the army. It may well be doubted whether the plans and proposed arrangements for the management of his kingdom, which are formed in the brains of the maniac who conceives himself a king, might not furnish very useful hints to those who are really such ; or, if their station de- pends on a delusion, it happens to be one very generally prevail- ing among all those who yield them obedience. These remarks are not intended to exclude the legitimate in- ference deducible from the resort to design and contrivance by the sane mind. In such, when preceding, and connected with the criminal act, it affords evidence of deliberate intention to commit it, and hence of the evil intent and malice which consti- MENTAL ALIENATION. 543 tute the highest elements of crime. The only object is to rescue the really irresponsible from the operation of a test entirely in- applicable to their case, and therefore insufficient to prove any- tliing whatever in relation to their sanity or insanity. We now come to another test, that proposed by Lord Erskine, viz., Delusion. The correctness of this test rests not alone on the authority of Lord Erskine, and its approval by Lord Kenyon in the case of Hadfield. It is also sanctioned by Sir John Nicholl, in the case of Dew vs. Clark, (3 Addams, 79,) who says, " The true criterion, the true test, of the absence or presence of in- sanity, I take to be, the absence or presence of what, used in a certain. sense of it, is comprisable in a single term, namely, delu- sion. In short, I look upon delusion, in this sense of it, and in- sanity to be, almost, if not altogether, convertible terms." This test, as we shall presently see, has been adopted in this country. To enable us to judge properly of the value and suf- ficiency of it, we should understand both its nature and its sources. As understood by medical jurists, it means the as- sumption, by the mind, of things as realities which have' no ex- istence as such. It is the substitution of the baseless creations of one's own mind, and the action upon them, instead of things as they really exist. Such being their nature, their source must be obvious, viz., the intellect. It is alone the province of the intellect to form ideas, and as delusions consist in ideal creations, it is clear they can be referable to no other source but that of the intellect. Their existence, therefore, may be received as evidence of intel- lectual mania, either general or partial. Delusion, where it is proved to exist, may fairly be received as a test of insanity ; but is its absence equally a test of sanity 1 This would undoubtedly be true, if the human mind consisted of nothing but intellect. But that, as we have already seen, is made up of propensities, sentiments, and emotions, as well as ideas ; or, in other words, it feels as well as thinks.. These pro- pensities and sentiments, as we have already seen, are liable to derangement, giving rise to the phenomena of moral mania. This form of derangement can hardly yet be said to be distinct- 544 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. ly recognized by the courts, although its existence may be affirm- ed to be clearly established. That form of it which has the most frequently come up for investigation, and afforded the greatest puzzle to courts, is the derangement of the destructive propen- sity, giving rise to homicidal mania. This will properly arise for more especial investigation in another connection. Although jurists have in many cases acquitted the prisoner, who was shown clearly to have destroyed under the insane impulse, yet the law can hardly yet be said to have framed a principle, under which the exemption from liability can be claimed. It will be readily perceived from all this, that the course of decisions has been somewhat vaccinating in reference to the tests of mental alienation. The old test of total deprivation of under- standing, adopted in the case of Arnold, has certainly been laid aside. That of delusion, adopted in the case of Hadfield, was laid aside in that of Bellingham, tried only twelve years afterwards, and the power of distinguishing right from wrong adopted in its place. This latter test was lost sight of in the trial of Martin for setting fire to the York Minster, and that of delusion again adopted. The power of distinguishing right from wrong was again adopted in a somewhat modified form, in the case of The King vs. Orford, and the test of delusion entirely disregarded. Again, in a late case occurring in 1837, that of Greens7nith, (see statement of the case in Taylor, 513,) Mr. Justice Parke told the jury that, as regards the effect of insanity on responsibility for crime, . " it is merely necessary that the party should have suffi- cient knowledge and reason to discriminate between right and wrong," thus rejecting the modification of Lord Lyndhurst, and leaving it simply on the power to discriminate between right and wrong in the abstract, and not as applied to the particular act in question. In the case of The King vs. Oxford, for shooting at the Queen, which occurred a short time after the last, and is reported in 9 Carrington fy Payne, 525, Chief Justice Denman told the jury " that the question for them to decide was, whether the prisoner was laboring under that species of insanity which satisfied them that he was quite unaware of the nature, character, and conse- MENTAL ALIENATION 545 quences of the act he was committing; or, in other words, whethtr he was under the influence of a diseased mind, and was really unconscious at the time he was committing the act, that it was a crime." In 1843 occurred the trial of McNaughton for killing Drum- mond, which excited through England a great degree of interest. In this case, it was shown that the prisoner was latterly of a sul- len and reserved character ; that he imagined himself the object and victim of unrelenting persecution ; that he was surrounded by persons who had formed a conspiracy against his comforts, character and life, and that these persons were always in' pursuit of him. The deceased was a stranger to him, but imagined to be one of his persecutors, and that it was necessary to kill him in order to free himself from persecution. In other respects, he appeared sound, and was shrewd in his business transactions, carefully managing his own affairs. The medical witnesses, eight in number, testified that at the time he committed the act, he was laboring under a delusion, and that he was led on by an im- pulse, so irresistible that nothing but a physical impediment could have prevented Ms committing it.. Lord Chief Justice Tindal in this case instructed the jury, that before convicting him, they must be satisfied that, when committing the criminal act, he had that competent use of his understanding as that he was doing a wicked and wrong thing ; that he was sensible it was a violation of the law of God and man. The prisoner was acquitted. This trial occasioned the submitting of certain questions, by the House of Lords, to the fifteen judges, with the view of elicit- ing their opinions in regard to criminal responsibility. As these questions and answers were designed to settle the law in England on this subject, it is proper to notice here those that have reference to the tests to be employed : Question I. "Whatsis the law respecting alleged crimes com- mitted by persons afflicted with insane delusions in respect of one or more particular subjects or persons ; as, for instance, when at the time of the commission of the alleged crime, the accused knew he was acting contrary to law, but did the act complained of 35 546 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. with the view, and under the influence of some insane delusion, of redressing or avenging some supposed grievance or injury, or of producing some supposed public benefit 1 Jlnswer. The opinion of the judges was, thdt, notwithstanding the party committed a wrong act, while laboring under the idea that he was redressing a supposed grievance or injury, or under the impression of obtaining some public or private benefit, he was liable to punishment." Question II. " What are the proper questions to be submitted to the jury, when a person alleged to be affected with insane de- lusion, respecting one or more particular subjects or persons, is charged with the commission of a crime — murder, for example — and insanity is set up as a defence 1 Jlnsvjer. Before a plea of insanity should be allowed, undoubt- ed evidence ought to be adduced, that the accused was of diseased mind, and that at the time he committed the act, he was not conscious of right and wrong. Every person was supposed to lenow what the law was, and therefore nothing could justify a wrong act, except it was clearly proved that the party did not know right from wrong. Question IV. If a person, under an insane delusion, as to, ex- isting facts, commits an offence in consequence thereof, is he hereby excused 1 Jlnswer. If the delusion were only partial, the party accused was equally liable with a person of sane mind. If the accused killed another in self-defence, he would be entitled to an acquittal, but if the crime were committed for any supposed injury, he would then be liable to the punishment awarded by the laws to his crime. 1 '' What the judges meant by a delusion that is only partial, is perhaps difficult of explanation. I am not aware of any known instance of general delusion; that is, of delusion universally en- tertained in reference to every thing. If the judges intended that the partial character of it should be understood in reference to the particular delusion entertained ; that is, that the individual alleged to be insane, had some glimpses of truth, and some de- lusive ideas in reference to the particular thing or act done or complained of, then it is apprehended there would be great and insuperable difficulties in ever making any application of it. MENTAL ALIENATION. 547 Again, the judges seem to have adopted the right and wrong test, without even annexing to it the qualification proposed by Lord Lyndhurst, unless they use the terms " right and wrong " as synonymous with those of "lawful and unlawful," which there is no sufficient reason for presuming. In the trials that have taken place in this country, where the plea of insanity has been interposed, so far as they have become generally known, the tests adopted by the common law of Eng- land, with the exception of the law as recently laid down by the fifteen judges, have in general been adopted. In 1835 occurred at Washington the trial of Lawrence, for shooting at General Jackson, then President of the United States. See Vol. 48 of Nile? Register, 119. The delusion under which he was shown to have labored, was that he supposed himself entitled to the English crown, and General Jackson refused to grant him a sufficient sum of money to enable him to assert his right to it, wherefore he supposed himself justified in shooting him. The correctness of the doctrine as laid down and asserted by Lord Erskine, and acquiesced in by Lord Kenyon in the case of Hadjield, was admitted by the court, and upon the strength of it Lawrence was acquitted. In the case of Theodore Wilson, tried in York county, Maine, in the year 1836, for the murder of his wife in a paroxysm of insanity., the court charged the jury that if they were satisfied the prisoner was not of sound memory and discretion, at the time of committing the act, they were bound to return a verdict of acquittal. Ray, 49, § 27. In the trial of Corey for the murder of Mrs. Nash, in New Hampshire, in 1829, the court, Chief Justice Richardson, stated in his charge to the jury, that the only question for them to settle was, whether he was of sane mind when the deed was done. Ray, § 27. On the trial of Prescott for the murder of Mrs. Cochran, sub- stantially the same language was made use of. On the trial of Rogers, in July 1843, for the murder of Mr Lincoln, in the State Prison of Massachusetts, the court, Chief 548 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. Justice Shaw, charged the jury, that insanity or delusion is an excuse for crime, in two ways ; first, where it amounts to a firm belief that one is liable to lose his own life, or suffer some great bodily harm; secondly, where some violent outbreak occurs, which, taken in connexion with former acts, indicates that the will was overborne. The questions for them to decide were, whether such a delusion existed in the mind of the accused ; whether he did the act under an insane, but firm belief, that the deceased was going to shut him up with some dangerous design, or not for a slight punishment ; whether the facts indicate that the deed was done at a moment when the delusion was uncon- trollable, Ray, 49 - 50, § 27. On the trial of Abbot by the Superior Court of Connecticut in 1841, for the murder of his wife, the jury were instructed to acquit the prisoner, " if they found that, at the time of commit- ting the act, he was insane ; had not sufficient understanding to distinguish right from wrong, and did not know that the murder of his wife was an offence against the laws of God and nature." Ray, 50, §27. In this State, the Revised Statutes (2 R. S., 697, § 2,) provide that no insane person can be tried, sentenced to any punishment, or punished, for any crime or offence, while he continues in that state ; and that no act done by a person, in a state of insanity, can be punished as an offence. If the last clause were allowed a construction as broad as its terms indicate, it would be only necessary to prove any species of mental alienation, although entirely unconnected with the act complained of, and the exemption from liability would follow of course. This part of the section received a construction in the case of Freeman vs. The People, (4 Denio, 9,) in whch Mr. Justice Beards- ley says that the clause is very comprehensive in its terms, and at first blush, might seem to exempt from punishment every act done by a person who is insane upon any subject whatever. The court in that case interpreted the phrase as if it had read " no act done by a person in a state of insanity," in respect to such act, " can be punished as an offence." It required an insane act, and MENTAL ALIENATION. 549 not merely the act of an insane person, in order to have applied to it the rule of exemption. In the case of Kleim, tried before Judge Edmonds, May 21, 1845, (see 2 Vol. American Journal of Insanity, 245,) we find some judicious and sound remarks relative to the rule of law to be applied to the insane condition. The judge begins by stating that the enquiry to be made under the rule of law, as now estab- lished, was as to the prisoner's knowledge of right and wrong, at the time of committing the offence. He takes the clear dis tinction between that knowledge in the abstract, and as applied to the act in question, by stating that the question whether the accused knew the difference between right and wrong is not to be put generally, but in reference to the very act with which he is charged ; and the inquiry therefore is, had the accused a suf- ficient degree of reason to know that he was doing an act that was wrong, or was he laboring under that species of mental ab- erration which satisfied the jury that he was quite unaware of the nature, character, and consequences of the act he was com mittiDg. Again he broaches another ground which if not new, has cer- tainly been but little known to the law. " If," says he, " some controlling disease was in truth the acting power within him, which he could not resist, or if he had not a sufficient use of his reason to control the passions which prompted the act com- plained of, he is not responsible ; but we must be sure not to be misled by a mere impulse of passion, an idle frantic humor, or unaccountable mode of action, but enquire whether it is an ab- solute dispossession of the free and natural agency of the human mind." Again, he remarks, " It must be borne in mind that the moral as well as the intellectual faculties may be disordered by the disease, so as to deprive the mind of its controlling and directing power. " The first clear legal recognition I have noticed of moral insanity. In order, continues the judge, " to constitute crime, a man must have memory and intelligence to know that the act that he is about to commit is wrong — to remember and understand that if he commits the act, he will be subject to punishment j and 55C ' MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. reason and will, to enable him to compare and choose between the supposed advantage or gratification to be obtained by the crimi- nal act, and the immunity from punishment which he will secure by abstaining from it. If, on the other hand, he have not intel- ligence and capacity enough to have a criminal intent and pur- pose ; and if his moral or intellectual powers are either so deficient that he has not sufficient will, conscience, or controlling mental power ; or if, through the overwhelming violence of mental disease, his intellectual power is, for the time, obliterated, he is ' not a responsible moral agent, and is not punishable for criminal acts." He further instructed the jury that they were to consider, as aids to a just conclusion, the extraordinary and unaccountable alteration in his whole mode of fife ; the inadequacy between the slightness of the cause and the magnitude of the offence ; the re- cluse and ascetic life which he had led ; his invincible repugnance to all intercourse with his fellow-creatures ; his behavior and con- duct at the time the act was done, and subsequently during his con- finement in prison ; and the stolid indifference which he alone had manifested during the whole progress of the trial, upon the result of which his life .or death was dependent. The prisoner was acquitted, and subsequently confined in the Asylum in Utica, where it was stated, , in 1846, that his bodily health was good, but his mind was nearly gone, quite demented. Another criminal trial which, taking the wonderful interest it excited, in connexion with the importance of the principles it involved, has perhaps never been equalled in this State, was that of William Freeman, for the murder of John G. Van Nest, tried in Auburn, July 6, 1846. This has been reported in full by Benja- min F. Hall, Esq., of Auburn. The volume will be found to contain an immense amount of valuable information on the sub- ject of mental alienation, and the application of legal principles to an insane condition of mind. The prisoner had been a convict in the State's Prison at Auburn, for the term of five years, for stealing a horse, of which he was probably innocent. On his liberation, he entertained the idea that as he was sent to the State's prison innocently, and had there labored for five years, he MENTAL ALIENATION. 551 was entitled to be paid for that labor, and endeavored to com- mence suits against some individuals to obtain his compensation. Failing to obtain anything in this way, he next seems to have sup- posed he must commence killing for that purpose, and accordingly began with the family of Van Nest, residing about four miles from Auburn, where he killed four and badly wounded another. There were many other facts in the case which cannot here be alluded to. On the arraignment of the prisoner, his counsel, the Hon. William H. Seward, tendered, in behalf of the prisoner, a plea of insanity, upon which the district attorney took issue. The court then proceeded to the trial of that issue, which was preliminary, and to have the effect only of determining whether the prisoner was then insane, or sufficiently sane for the trial to proceed. The jury of triers having heard much testimony on the subject, finally returned for a verdict, " We find the prisoner sufficiently sane in mind and memory to distinguish between right and wrong." To the sufficiency of this verdict, the prisoner's counsel ob- jected, atad asked the court to instruct the jury to find a verdict upon the issue raised by the plea of insanity, that is, whether the prisoner is " sane or insane." The court refused, and the counsel excepted, and this constituted the most important point raised on the bill of exceptions, and which was presented to the Supreme Court. It was, in fact, no other than the finding whether the capacity to distinguish between right and wrong was a finding of sanity ; or, in other words, whether sanity, and the capacity to distinguish between right and wrong, were equivalent terms. On this point, in the case of The People vs. Freeman, before re- ferred to, the court say, that " in the case at bar, the court profes- sed to furnish a single criterion of sanity, that is, a capacity to distinguish between right and wrong. This, as a test of insanity, is by no means invariably correct ; for while a person has a very just perception of the moral qualities of both actions, he may, at the same time, as to some one in particular, be absolutely insane, and consequently as to this be incapable of judging accurately be- tween right and wrong. If the delusion extends to the alleged crime, on the contemplated trial, the party manifestly is not in a tit condition to make his defence, however sound his mind may 552 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. in other respects be." This may certainly be regarded as set- tling the question in this State, that the power of distinguishing between right and wrong, in the abstact, and insanity, are not convertible terms. On his trial, under the arraignment, the prisoner's counsel re- lied much on the law as laid down by Judge Edmonds in the case of Kleim. The Attorney-General, Hon. John Van Buren, insisted, that to render a man irresponsible the law required an incapacity to distinguish between right and wrong in regard to the particular act committed, or an inability from disease to resist the commission of the act. A rigid construction of this rule would ex- clude those acts which resulted from delusion. Judge Whiting, in his charge to the jury, instructed them to- consider that sanity consists in having a knowledge of right and wrong, as to the particular act charged to have been done by an individual, and in possessing memory, intelligence, reason, and will. The judge further laid down the law to be, " That if the jury find that he was unaware, from insanity, of the nature of the act he committed, the prisoner should be acquitted. If dis- ease was the acting power within him, which he could not resist, he should be acquitted. If he had not sufficient use of his reason, from insanity, to control the passions which prompted the mur- der, he is not responsible. If the jury are satisfied that there was a dispossession, by disease, of the free and natural agency of Ms mind, he is not responsible." The judge also instructed the jury to inquire whether the prisoner was laboring under a delusion, and submitted to them whether his acts were the effects of delusion, or of an unsound and erroneous judgment as to his rights, and the way of redres- sing his supposed wrongs. The jury found a verdict of guilty, and sentence of death was passed upon him, to be executed on the 18th day of December then next. A writ of error was allowed upon the bill of excep- tions taken, and on review before the Supreme Court, a new trial was granted upon the points raised in reference to the pre- liminary trial or proceeding, the principal one of which I havt' already alluded to. MENTAL ALIENATION. 553 While these proceedings were pending, the prisoner was sink- < ing into a lower state of bodily health and mental imbecility, until finally he died in his cell, on the 21st August, 1847. A post-mortem examination was made of his brain, in the presence of a number of highly respectable physicians, the result of which was that the brain was found extensively diseased, and of a character showing very satisfactorily that the disease, in its in- cipient stages, must date back to a period anterior to the sup- posed criminal act for which he was tried and convicted. It will be seen, from a careful review of the whole matter, that the legal principles hitherto laid down as applicable to the crimi- nal responsibility of the alleged insane, are either too deficient, or of too vague and indefinite a character, justifying the remark of Judge Edmonds, in the case of Kleim, that " the law, in its slow and cautious progress, still lags far behind the advance of true knowledge." One difficulty seems to be the attempt to apply the same prin- ciple to different conditions of deranged mind. Of these, there are at least four different conditions. 1 . The first of these is where there is a clear mental deficiency ; where the very notion of crimes, laws, and punishments is either confused and imperfect, or not entertained at all ; and where the test of ability to distinguish right from wrong, if it should be ap- plied anywhere, has an application. 2. The second is where delusion lies at the sources of thought, and where the act itself is directly traceable to it. 3. The third is where the act results from insane impulse, and is irresistible ; and, as in the first, there is a want of intellect, so ' here there is a lack of will. 4. The fourth is where decided symptoms of derangement have been manifested, but the immediate act is prompted by the receipt of a real injury, as in the case of Lord Ferrers. See Ray's Med. Juris, of Insanity, § 128. The three first mentioned have, on different occasions, although not uniformly, been recognized by the law. The last has not yet Deen recogttized. Insanity may exonerate from punishment, if it occur after the 854 MEDICAL JURISPRU1/ENCE. crime is committed. The law will not permit a man while in aii insane state, whenever it occured, either to be tried, or have judg- ment passed upon him, or to have that judgment executed. Legal Consequences or Idiocy, Imbecility, and Dementia- comprising ALL CASES OF DEFECTIVE DEVELOPMENT OR, POWER OF Mind. The legal consequences attaching to this condition of mind has reference both to criminal and civil responsibility. So far as respects the first, the law always primarily regards the intent to injure, and hence requires that to be first made out to the satis- faction of the court or jury. It also regards the intent to com- mit the kind of injury legitimately deducible from the act. What then are the elements of the intent to injure ? They may be summed up in, 1 . A perception by the intellect, and an appreciation by the moral powers, of the relations in which rational human beings stand towards each other : 2. Sufficient power of propensity to furnish the impulses necessary to invade the rights of others : 3. Sufficient intellectual power to perceive the relevancy of means to ends, and the ruinous results to others to which those impulses, if followed, would naturally or necessarily lead ; and 4. Sufficient strength of moral power, or of the faculty of con- scientiousness, to feel the deviation from right, and to know that the act contemplated is a wrong, and not simply an injury. A radical, fatal defect in either one of these should render the being irresponsible. The questions then in any given case to be asked and answered are, 1 . Are the relations of human beings perceived 1 2. Are the impulses sufficiently strong that lead to the act 1 3.. Are the nature of the means employed, and end accom- plished, understood 1 4. Are the moral results felt to be wrong 1 The cases of Schmidt, Delepine, Prescott, Barclay, and Lecouffp are given by Dr. Eay, to which the reader is referred as instances illustrating this branch of enquiry. It was probably in reference to this condition of mind that the test of power to distinguish MENTAL ALIENATION 555 between right and wrong was first adopted, and to this only that it can have a proper application. In reference to the civil liabilities of the mentally defective, or the principle that divests them of their property, and absolves them from their contracts, some considerable difficulty has been experienced. The issuing, execution, and return of a commis- sion, has already been briefly adverted to. The difficulty mostly arises out of the individual case presented. One very curious in its details is that of Mr. Edward Davies, which may be found in Guy, 320-21. He was a tea dealer in London, and had grown rich in the business. He was of a timid and yielding dis- position, so that although twenty-seven years of age and carrying on an extensive and lucrative business, he was completely sub- ject to the authority of his mother. He neither carried nor spent money without her permission, and dared not quit the house without her leave. He was easily agitated, anxious and fanciful about his complaints, vain of his literary acquirements, abject and timid, but an able and successful tradesman, and thoroughly competent to conduct his business. He became restive under his mother's restraint, and under the influence of it his bodily health and mental tranquility became impaired. He exhibited cccasional incoherence and excitement and antipa- thy to his mother, which was considered by some as a delusion. Proceedings were instituted against him, and it was remarked that the very persons who were trying to confine him as unfit to take care of his business, were themselves consulting him about the management of that very business. After a brief period of confinement his agitation subsided, his incoherence diminished, and nothing but his antipathy to his mother and certain sus- picions, considered as delusions, remained. A commission was granted, but on its execution he was restored to liberty, and the management of his property. The foregoing, if an instance of incapacity at all, must have resulted from the defective develop- ment of some of the mental powers coupled with a tendency to intellectual mania or the entertainment of delusion. The legal principle in relation to contracts applicable to this condition of mind is thus laid down by Kent, 2 Kenfs Com., 452. 556 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. " Imbecility of mind is not sufficient to set aside a contract, when there is not an essential privation of the reasoning faculties, or an incapacity of understanding and acting in the ordinary affairs of life. This incapacity is now the test of that unsoundness of mind which will avoid a deed at law. The law cannot under- take to measure the validity of contracts by the greater or less strength of the understanding ; and if the party be compos mentis, the mere weakness of his mental powers does not incapacitate him." In the case of Jackson ex dem. Cadwell and others vs. King # King, 4 Cowen, 207, the point in controversy was the validity of a deed executed by a grantor, claimed on the one part to have been incompetent, but whose competency was asserted on the other. Many authorities will be found cited in the case. The court there lay down the doctrine that it must be shown that the grantor was non compos, within the legal acceptation of the term ; that it was not a partial, but an entire loss of the understanding. The ground is taken that the common law draws no discrimina- ting line by which to determine how great must be the imbecility of mind to render a contract void, or how much intellect must remain to uphold it. That mere weakness of understanding is not, of itself, any objection in law to the validity of a contract. That if a man be legally compos mentis, he is the disposer of his own property, and his will stands for a reason for his actions. Substantially the same principles were affirmed in the case of Odell vs. Buck, 21 Wend., 142. But although. courts of law refuse to interfere and declare void a contract made by an imbecile, unless the imbecility be of such a character, and prevail to such an extent, as to amount to un- soundness of mind, yet courts of equity and even of law, interfere to vacate contracts, and all other acts entered into by a party laboring under a great degree of weakness or imbecility of mind, on the ground of fraud. 1 Story's Equity Jurisprudence,- 227 '. The difference between courts of law and equity in relation to taking cognizance of matters of fraud is, that the former require the fraud to be proved, while the latter will, under certain cir • cumstances, presume it. Jackson vs. King, 4 Cowen, 207 - 220 MENTAL ALIENATION. 557 It is, therefore, principally in courts of equity that causes of this character come up for investigation, and whenever a case is presented for equitable interference, the whole matter is thorough- ly sifted, all the circumstances examined, all the presumed in fluences inquired into, the consideration of the contract, the in- ducements held out, the nature of the contract, in fine, every thing that can possibly aid in throwing any light upon the act of the parties, and the knowledge, views and motives under which the transaction has occurred. Whenever, from the nature of the transaction, there is not evidence of entire good faith, or the contract or other act is not seen to be just in itself, or for the benefit of these persons, courts of equity will set it aside, or make it subservient to their just rights and interests. 1 Story's Ejuity Jurisprudence, \ 228. The doctrine, in general terms, may be stated to be — that the acts and contracts of persons of weak understandings, and who are thereby liable to imposition, will be held void in courts of equity, if the nature of the act or contract justify the conclusion, that the party has not exercised a deliberate judgment, but that he has been imposed upon, circumvented, or overcome by cun- ning, or artifice, or undue influence. 1 Story's Equity Jurispru- dence, 250, §238 ; Gartside vs. hherwood, 1 Bro. Ch. R., 560-61. The great rule of the court as announced by Lord Eldon in the case of Gibson vs. Jeyes, 6 Vesey, 266, page 278, is that " he who bargains in a matter of advantage with a person placing confi- dence in him, is bound to show that a reasonable use has been made of that confidence ; a rule applying to trustees, attorneys, or any one else." The same principle is asserted with approval in the case of Whelan vs. Whelan # Whelan, 3 Coweris Rep., 537, in which on page 572, the court say that " a contract obtained from one party, so much in the power of the other, cannot be sanctioned, if confidence has been abused, if there is inadequacy of price, or the inference is plain, that advantage has been taken of age and imbecility." This may justly be considered as a leading case on this subject, and very important in reference to the doctrine discussed and settled by it. Inadequacy of consideration alone is not considered as sufficient 558 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. to authorise equity to interfere and presume mental weakness sufficient to vacate contracts entered into between parties other- ways competent, unless it is so very great as to demonstrate some gross imposition, or some undue influence ; or, in other words, unless it is made out to such extent as to shock the conscience, and amount, in itself, to evidence of fraud. In such case it would be deemed sufficient. 1 Story's Equity Jurisprudence, 257, ^245-6; Coles vs. Trecothick, 9 Vesey, 246; Under hill vs. Har- wood, 10 Vesey, 219 ; Gwynne vs. Heaton, 1 Bro. Ch. R., 1. ^ The case of Portsmouth vs. Portsmouth, 1 Haggard, 359, involves the consideration of the extent of capacity requisite to enable the party to enter into a valid matrimonial contract. A great num- ber of witnesses were examined, from which it appeared, that the Earl of Portsmouth possessed a capacity equal to the ordinary transactions of life ; that he had a good memory when at school, and made progress in arithmetic and the languages ; that he set- tled accounts with agents, attended public meetings and commit tees, prosecuted an offender, and was examined as a witness. On the contrary it appeared that he had always been treated by his family as one of feeble capacity ; that his servants were his play-fellows, upon whom he was in the habit of playing all sorts of tricks ; that he was fond of driving a team, and that one was kept for his amusement, as a toy or plaything for him ; that he had a propensity for bell-ringing, was fond of slaughtering cattle, and indulged in wanton cruelty towards man and beast. That a medical man, taken into the family, obtained complete ascendency over him. That he finally delivered him up to the earl's trustees in London, one of whom, within one week after, married him to his own daughter. And it was the validity of this marriage that was called in question. The court, Sir John Nicholl, observed that the capacity for instruction and improvement is possessed even by the brute cre- ation, and, therefore, did not, of itself, disprove the fact of im- becility ; that his testifying in a court of justice required little, if anything, more than memory; that his behavior in company, and his few observations on the state of the weather, horses and forming, were not incompatible with great imbecility of mind MENTAL ALIENATION. 559 oecause under the restraint produced by formal company, and by the sense of being observed, the more prominent features of imbecility would be shaded, and the individual might pass as possessing a considerable degree of understanding. He declared the marriage null and void. Another case in which the marriage contract was annulled on the ground of imbecility in one of the contracting parties, was that of Miss Bagster, reported in 1 Beck's Med. Juris., 579. She was a lady of fortune and had perpetrated a runaway match with a Mr. Newton. Her friends applied for a dissolution on the ground that she was of unsound mind. The facts stated were that she had been a violent, self-willed, and passionate child ; that this continued as she grew up ; that she was totally ignorant of arithmetic, and therefore incapable of taking care of her pro- perty ; that she had manifested a great fondness for matrimony, having engaged herself to several persons, and that, in many re- spects, she evinced little of the delicacy belonging to her sex. She appeared to have memory, but to lack judgment and reason- ing power. Dr. Gordon did not consider her capacity to exceed that of a child of seven years of age. On her examination before the commissioners her answers were pertinent and in a proper manner. Both Drs. Morrison and Haslam had visited her and did not consider her imbecile or idiotic. The jury, however, brought in their verdict that she was of unsound mind since November 1, 1830, and the marriage was consequently dissolved. Questions involving the testamentary capacity, or legal com- petency to make a last will and testament, are those which, per- haps, the most frequently arise for investigation in courts of justice. The execution of a will is not unfrequently one of the last acts of life, and its provisions are seldom of a character to meet the views of all the expectants. Hence the disposition, so frequently manifested, of calling in question the legal capacity of the testator. A will is the legal declaration of a man's intentions of what he wills to be performed after his death. Nuncupative or unwritten wills, both in this state and in England, are of no validity unless made by a soldier, while in actual military service, or by a mari 560 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. ner while at sea. In all other cases wills are required to be in writing. No particular form of words is necessary to constitute it. The construction given to it, is that which carries out, the most effect- ually, the intentions of the testator, which are to be gathered from the whole instrument taken altogether. In this state, the will is executed by the testator's signing it at the end of it in the presence of two witnesses, declaring it to be his last will and testament, asking them to sign it as attesting witnesses, and they, at his request, signing their names as such witnesses, and also stating their respective places of residence. Many points relative to what constitutes a legal mode of exe- cuting a last will and testament will be found discussed and de- cided in the case of Remsen and another vs. Brinkerhqff and others, 26 Wend. Rep., 325. A valid will cannot be executed by an infant, an idiot, or a person of insane memory. The diseases which are the most likely to invalidate a will, or to throw a doubt over the testa- mentary capacity of the testator, are all lethargic and comatose affections, whether arising from an internal cause, or an external injury. The effect of these is to suspend the intellectual facul- ties. Apoplexy also produces the same effect, and in case of recovery the patient is often left in a state of imbecility. Phren- itis, delirium tremens, and those inflammations which are accom- panied with delirium, also impair the mind. 1 Beck's Med. Juris., 637. It is often a point of extreme difficulty to decide where an in- dividual's disposing capacity really terminates. Apoplexy, hemi- plegia, phrenitis, delirium tremens, and all other diseases affect- ing primarily the brain or organs of mind, are, in their nature, disqualifying only so far as they actually impair or destroy the power of manifesting the mental faculties. The fact of their ex- istence, therefore, either previously or at the time a will is exe- cuted, should have no other effect than to induce a suspicion of incapacity, and thus lead to a more strict investigation of the real situation of the party. There is another class of diseases not primarily affecting the MEKTAI. ALIENATION. 5(jl Drain, but expending themselves upon other organs, such, for instance, as the pulmonary consumption, which furnish but slight, if any, presumption that the mental powers suffer any degree of diminution. In fact the very reverse frequently occurs, these powers appearing brighter, more active, more energetic, as the sources of life in the organism are wasting away ; as if while the one was returning to its kindred dust, the other was awaking to a higher life. Many cases have occurred in which great difficulties were pre- sented. In Bennett's case, cited in 9 Vesey, 186, Shelford on Ln nacy, 179, Lord Chief Justice Eyre stated to the jury that the point was, whether the testator knew perfectly what he was doing, at the time the will was executed. In Ingram vs. Wyatt, 1 Haggard's Ecclesiastical Reports, 88-1, the court, Sir John JVicholl, remark that mental imbecility seems to proceed from want of quickness, activity and motion in the intellectual faculties ; that sometimes different faculties are found failing in different persons ; that the memory is sometimes per- fect where higher powers of the understanding are greatly de- fective ; that in an individual of imbecile mind the understand- ing has made little progress with years ; that it has not matured and ripened in the usual manner ; that in such a case, unless the imbecility be extreme, by help of memory, imitation, habit, some improvement may take place, some progress in knowledge made. so that ideas may be acquired, facts, circumstances, places, and hacknied quotations recollected, and the individual will even conduct himself orderly and mannerly, make a few rational re- marks on familiar and trite subjects, retain self-dominion, spend his own little income in providing for his wants, as a boy spends his pocket money, and yet may labor under great infirmity of mind, and be very liable to fraud and imposition. Sir John Nicholl appears to have well understood the leading characteristics of the imbecile mind. The principal marks and features of imbecility, he remarks in the same case, are the same which belong to childhood, varying in degree in different indi- viduals. That these are frivolous pursuits; fondness for, and stress upon, trifles ; inertness of mind , paucity of ideas ; shy 36 •I MEDICAL JURISI'RULENCE. ness ; timidity ; submission to control ; acquiescence under in- fluence, and the like. Hence these infantile qualities have ac- quired for this species of deficiency of understanding, the name of childishness. The effect is, that where imbecility exists at all, and in proportion to its degree, it becomes necessary, especially in a case exposed to other adverse presumptions, to ascertain its extent with some accuracy, to see how tar the individual was liable to be controlled by influence, to submit to ascendency, to acquiesce from inertness and confidence in those acts, upon the validity of which the court has to decide. In a case in 8 Massachusetts Rep., 372, the court instructed the jury, " that if they should think that the testatrix, at the time of dictating the will, had sufficient discretion for, that pur- pose ; and that, at the time of executing the will, she was able to recollect the particulars she had so dictated, they might ;find her of sound disposing mind and memory at the time of exe- cuting." Swinburne says, " if a man be of a mean understanding, neither of the wise sort, nor of the foolish, but indifferent, as it were, betwixt a man and a fool ; yea, though he rather incline to the foolish sort, so that, for his dull capacity, he might worthily be called grossum caput, a dull pate or a dunce ; such an one is not prohibited to make a testament," and again, " it is said that old age is of itself no incapacity, unless it produce mere childishness, or idiocy, as where the testator forgets his own name." In Van Alst. vs. Hunter, 5 John. Chan. Rep., 148, the validity of a will made by a person between ninety and one hundred years of age was contested. The chancellor there says, " it is well un- derstood that age alone will not disqualify a person from making a will, provided he has a competent possession of his mental faculties. The law looks only to the competency of the under- standing ; and neither age, nor sickness, nor extreme distress, or debility of body will affect the capacity to make a will, if suffi- cient intelligence remain. The failure of memory is not sufficient to create the incapacity, unless it be quite total, or extend to his immediate family and property. The Roman law seemed to apply the incapacity only to an extreme failure of memory,- as MENTAL ALIENATION. 563 for a man to forget his own name. The want of recollection of names, the chancellor observes, is one of the earliest symptoms of a decay of the memory, but this failure may exist to a very great degree, and yet the solid power of understanding remain. The case of Clarke vs. Fisher, 1 Paige, 171, is important as in- volving the question of weakness of mind, and also the practice of fraud and imposition. That was the case of a will made by an old man of about eighty years of age, who, for about four years previous to his death, had been paralytic and mostly con- fined to his bed, his speech being much impaired. About three years before his death, he was married to a sister of his first wife, in whose favor, shortly before his death, he made the will in question ; at first giving all his property to his wife, but sub- sequently, in the same will, giving one-fourth after the death of his wife to a supposed daughter of his deceased brother, Law- rence Fisher, who, it was shown, was imposed upon him as his niece, and the other three-fourths to the heirs of Eleanor Clark, Maria Clark, Ann Smith, and Isaac Rapelye. The Chancellor set aside the will, and remarks that " the general principles of law in relation to the capacity of a person to make a will, are well under- stood. He must be of sound and disposing mind and memory, so as to be capable of making a testamentary disposition of his property with sense and judgment, in reference to the situation and amount of such property, and to the relative claims of the different persons who are, or might be, the objects of his bounty." The validity of the same will was also the point in controversy in the case of Clarke et al. vs. Sawyer et al, which was sustained by the Assistant Vice-Chancellor of the first circuit, see 3 Sandf. Rep., 351, but on appeal, was reversed by the Chancellor, from which an appeal was taken to the court of appeals. The same cause there will be found reported in 2 Comstoclc's Reports, 498. in which the decree of the Chancellor is affirmed, and on the same ground, viz., that it was obtained through undue influence. At the same time, the doctrine contained in the cases of Stewart's Executors vs. Lispenard, 26 Wend., 255, and Blanchard vs. JYestle, 3 DeniojWl, hereafter mentioned, was referred to and adopted. The provisions of the will itself are regarded, as furnishing n* 564 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. small amount of evidence in relation to testamentary capacity. Swinburne says, " If a lunatic person, or one that is beside him- self at sometimes, but not continually, make his testament, and it is not known whether the same were made while he was of sound mind and memory or no, then in case the testament be so conceiv- ed, as thereby no argument of phrenzy or folly can be gathered, it is to be presumed that the same was made during the time of his calm and clear intermissions, and so the testament shall be ad- judged good ; yea, although it cannot be proved that the testator useth to have any clear and quiet intermissions at all, yet, never- theless, I suppose that if the testament be wisely and orderly framed, the same ought to be accepted for a lawful testament." This reasoning has always exerted a very strong influence in all adjudications relative to the testamentary capacity — a "rational act, rationally done," presuming its source to be rational. Along with the nature of the act, should also be considered its attendant circumstances, such as the situation of the testator at the time ; who were his associates ; by whom he was surrounded ; to what influences he was subject ; whose interests he has favored ; and what have been the relations existing between him and those so favored. We have already seen that a will will not be set aside on the ground of imbecility in the testator, if the party knew perfectly what he was doing when it was made. The best evidence of this, is instructions in reference to the provisions of the will, coming from the testator himself. If these cannot be proved, the defect may possibly be remedied by showing that something passed at the execution tantamount to instructions; or, if that be incapable of proof, then to show subsequent recognitions of its provisions of a clear and decided character. The suggestion made by Mr. Taylor in reference to this is worthy of attention, viz., that if a medical practitioner is present at the time the will is executed, he can easily satisfy himself of the state of mind of the testator, by requiring him to repeat from memory the way in which he has disposed of his property. If, upon such request, he repeat the leading provisions of the will correctly, he may be presumed to have understood himself while making, or directing the provi MENTAL ALIENATION. 5C5 sions to be made. Taylor's Med. Juris., 512. In case no suspi- cion of fraud exists, a will consistent with previous affection and declarations, and supported by recognition and circumstances showing volition and capacity, is valid, though made in extremis, or at the very termination of life, and though the instructions were conveyed through the party benefited. 1 Hagg. Eccl. Rep., 227. So, also, it has been held that the clearest and most consistent evidence of capacity and volition is required to support a codicil conveying bequests of such extent as to be irreconcilable with the character of the deceased, and with her intentions, as proved by her affections and former testamentary dispositions ; and where the deceased, at the time of its execution, was in a state of ex- treme weakness and debility, all her confidential friends being excluded or absent, and those only about her who were benefited under, or engaged in, the preparation or execution of the instru- ment. 1 Hagg. Eccl. Rep., 256. A case was tried *n Northampton, Massachusetts, in 1848, in which the only question was the capacity of one of the attesting witnesses to a will. It was the case of Oliver SmitKs Will, re- ported in 4 Vol. American Journal of Insanity, 226. The heirs at Jaw claimed that Theophilus P. Phelps, one of the attesting wit- nesses, was in a state of mental alienation at the time of its attes- tation, and, therefore, that there had not been a compliance with the provisions of the statute. The sufficiency of the defence, admitting it to be established, was fully conceded, but the point at issue was whether it was made out. The jury sustained the will, finding the attesting witness competent. The law admits a testamentary capacity, where there exists a degree of mental imbecility that would incapacitate for the transaction of ordinary business. In 3 Wash. C. C. R., 587, Judge Washington says, "The capacity may be perfect to dispose of property by will, yet very inadequate for the management of other business ; as, for instance, to make contracts for the pur- chase and sale of property." " It is sufficient, if the testator has such a mind and memory a? enable him to understand the ele- 566 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. rnents of which a will is composed, the disposition of his property in its simplest form." The question as to what constitutes a legal capacity to make a will, was the most extensively discussed and clearly settled in the great case of Stewart's Executor vs. Lispenard and Others, decided in the Court of Errors of this State, and reported in 26 Wendell, 255. The point in controversy in this suit was the validity of the will of Mice Lispenard. The ground upon which it was claimed to be invalid was, that during her whole life, she labored under such a degree of imbecility of mind as to incapacitate her from making a valid will. The surrogate decided against its validity, refusing to admit it to probate. On appeal to the circuit judge of the first circuit, the surrogate's decree was affirmed. The Chancellor on appeal affirmed the same decree ; and from the decree of the Chancellor an appeal was taken to the Court of Errors. The references to authorities, discussions and decisions in this case are all deeply interesting, and it is probably a case that best settles the lowest amount of capacity necessary to the making of a last will and testament. The facts were very numer- ous, and may be found on reference to the case, and also an abridged statement of them in Guy's Principles of Forensic Medi- cine, 291, et seq. The doctrines essentially established in this case may be laid down to be the following : 1. The right of testamentary disposition of property is a natural right, and not a mere institution of positive law. It is subject to the restrictions and regulations of civil legislation, but is not its mere creature. 2. That a man's capacity may be perfect to dispose of his pro- perty by will, yet inadequate for the management of other busi- ness ; as, for instance, to make contracts for the purchase and sale of property. 3. That affirmative facts prove the existence of mind ; and, when that is once shown, the negative go to show only its defects and weakness, not its entire deprivation. That a wise man does not always show reason, a fool never. 4. That imbecility of mind in a testator will not avoid his last MENTAL ALIENATION. 5C7 will and testament. That idiots, lunatics, and persons non com- pos mentis, are disabled from disposing of their property by will ; but that every person not embraced within either of these classes, and not laboring under any particular disability, as in- fancy, &c, is competent to make a will, be his understanding ever so weak. That in passing upon the validity of a will, courts do not measure the extent of the understanding of the testator, and that if he be not totally deprived of reason, whether he be wise or unwise, he is the lawful disposer of his property, and his will stands as a reason for his actions. 5. That the principle upon which the incapacity to make con- tracts and transact ordinary business mainly rests is, that those acts are held to be void, not on account of the general and posi- tive disability of the party to perform all similar acts, but because the whole transaction, with its accompanying circumstances, in- cluding, of course, the fact of mental imbecility, evinced that his consent was wanting to the particular act the subject of adjudica tion. 6. In the case of the will of a person of imbecile mind, a want of consent by the testator to a particular will may be urged from Ids inability to comprehend its effects and nature ; from the dis- positions of the property being contrary to what naturally might have been expected from the relative situation of the parties ; the preferences, partialities, and former testamentary declarations of the testator ; the absence, at the makirjg of the will, of those to whom he commonly looked for advice ; and generally from the surrounding circumstances, into which the court called upon to pass upon the validity of the will will look with vigilance. And so, on the contrary, evidence of the general knowledge and under- standing of the testator that he is the owner of property, and has the power of disposing of it by will ; of his previous declarations and intent as to its disposition ; of his gratitude and attachment to the donee for long and persevering care and kindness ; and the will itself being in a simple form, intelligible to the plainest mind, will be sufficient to justify the court to pronounce it a genuine and valid instrument. Substantially the same doctrine, in regard to the mental capa- 568 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. city sufficient to make a will, has since come under the review of the, Supreme court in the case of Blanchard vs. Nestle, 3 Denio, 37^ and was adopted and applied by the court in that case. Legal Consequences of Mania : The principle upon which exemption from legal liability here rests, is entirely diiferent from that we have just 'been consider- ing. There may be here no lack of intelligence ; no want of in- tellectual power to comprehend the law to which obedience is required. The difficulty consists not in the inability to under- stand, but to obey. It toes, not in a deficient intellect, but in an erroneously directed or perverted will. Legal Consequences of Intellectual Mania : When a maniac commits a trespass upon the person or proper- ty of others, the law renders him amenable in damages to be re- covered in a civil action. Weaver vs. Ward, Hobarfs Rep., 134. The same question has recently arisen in this State, in the case of Krorn, vs. Schoonmaker, 3 Barbour's Supreme Court Reports, C47. It is there decided by Harris, Justice, that a lunatic can- not be punished for a crime, but he may be prosecuted for an in- jury done to another ; that he is not a free agent, capable of in- telligent, voluntary action, and therefore is incapable of a guilty intent, which is the very essence of crime ; but that a civil ac- tion, to recover damages for an injury, may be maintained against him, because the intent with which the act was done is not ma- terial. The principle upon which this distinction rests, reaches to the measure of damages in a civil action. Where the intent to injure is established, the jury may take that into consideration, and give severe exemplary damages . But a maniac has, in strictness, no will, and hence the only damages that can be properly claim- ed against him, is the mere compensation of the parly injured. The legal consequences of general intellectual mania, are easily ascertained and settled. The prevalence of mania, or deranged and perverted action of the intellectual faculties generally, must necessarily be productive of those insane delusions or hallucina- tions, that entirely unfit the individual from basing his conduct upon the ordinary principles of human action. The distorted MENTAL ALIENATION. 5(j9 \ if w which the intellect then takes of things ; the intermingling and confounding together of relations ; and the assumption of, and action upon, fancies for facts, all have the effect to disqualify the individual from enforcing his rights, or performing his du- ties, as a citizen or a subject. The commonly received principles of human action affect not him. He is a being by himself, act- ing upon assumptions having no existence except in his own mind, and in accordance with principles unacknowledged by his race. The law, therefore, wisely takes him from his own guid- ance, and while it divests him of his rights, releases him also from his duties. It allows him the use, but not the abuse, of his property ; and holds him irresponsible for any aggression upon life, because he is wanting in those elements of accountability which must be possessed in order to constitute crime. The legal mode of determining incapacity by issuing, executing, and re- turning a commission, has already been considered. The cases of difficulty that have presented themselves are those of partial intellectual mania, in which the derangement exists on one or a few topics, leaving the operations of intellect sane upon every other. We apprehend the true principle to be, that whether partial intellectual mania does, or does not, invali- date an act, must depend upon the connection of the act with the peculiar derangement ; that where the act proceeds from, or is intimately connected with, the insane delusion, the actor is ir- responsible, because in respect to such an act, he has ceased be- ing a five moral agent. Court; of justice have shown a reluctance to the admission of this principle. It presented itself in the case of Greenwood, Ray's Mtiical Jurisprudence of Insanity, 238 ; White vs. Wilson, 13 Vesyh Rep., 88. He was a maniac of intelligence, having been bred to the bar. In the delirium of a fever, he received a draught n om the hand of his brother, and immediately enter- tained the delusion that his brother had given him a potion with a view to destroy him. He recovered from the fever, but never from the delusion. That morbid idea ever afterwards haunted him, and in the will which he subsequently made, he disinherit- ed his brother. The question arose upon the validity of the will. 570 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. A verdict had been obtained in the Court of Common Pleas against the will, but the judge strongly advised the jury to find the other way, and they did accordingly find in favor of the will. Subsequently, further proceedings took place, which finally re- sulted in a compromise. The same kind of question arose in the case of Johnson vs. Moore's heirs, 1 Little's Rep., 371, in Kentucky. The point in question was the validity of the will of George Moore, which was made by him in 1822, and shortly before his death. About four years previously, he had a dangerous fever, during which he imbibed a strong antipathy against his brothers, imagining they intended to destroy or injure him, which was entirely with- out foundation. This antipathy continued ever afterwards, with the exception that at one time he made a will in their favor, but afterwards cancelled it. The will he left executed, gave all his property to others, he declaring to one of the witnesses that they had endeavored to get his estate before Ms death. The court set aside the will, remarking that the testator could not be accounted a free agent, in making his will, so far as his relatives were concerned, although free as to the rest of the world. In the case of Dew vs. Clark, 3 Ma'ams' Reports, 79, the ques- tion of partial intellectual mania, or its effect upon the' mind of a testator, was extensively discussed. The testator, a man of in- telligence, a surgeon and medical electrician, left a personal es- tate of nearly ,£40,000, bequeathing to the complainant, a daugh- ter and only child, a life-interest in a small portion of it, bestow- ing the most of it upon his nephews. He had managed his pe- cuniary affairs, and conducted his business, in a rational and suc- cessful manner, but was shown by the daughter, from an early period of her life, to have manifested towards her an insane aversion. The particulars given, leave no room for doubt but that he was laboring under a complete delusion in regard to her character. The court, Sir John Nicholl, considering it fully proved that the will was the direct, unqualified offspring of the morbid delusion concerning the daughter, pronounced it to be null and void in law. MENTAL ALIENATION. 571 In 2 FWiier en Obligations, Appendix, 24, is laid down, as we suppose, the true doctrine, by Mr. Evans, the translator: "I cannot but think," says he, " that a mental disorder operating on partial subjects, should, with regard to those subjects, be at- tended with the same effects as a total deprivation of reason ; and that, on the other hand, such a partial disorder, operating only on particular subjects, should not, in its legal effects, have an influence more extensive than the subjects to which it applies, and that every question should be reduced to the point, whether the act under consideration proceeded from a mind fully capable, in respect to that act, of exercising free, sound, and discriminat- ing judgment; but in case the infirmity is established to exist, the tendency of it to direct or fetter the operations of the mind, should be in general regarded as sufficient presumptive evidence, without requiring a direct and positive proof of its actual ope- ration." In accordance with these views, the rule or principle to be followed in reference to any act, is — 1. To establish the delusion, which must be entertained as true, and must be false in fact : 2. To trace the act in question directly to the delusion, either as being actually produced by it, or so intimately connected with it as to lead to the presumption that it never would have occur- red had not the delusion existed. It has been made a question by many, whether the rule should be so restricted ; whether the necessity should exist, of connect- ing the act with the delusion, in order to render it invalid. Lord Erskine, in his speech in the case of Hadfield, before re- ferred to, states that when delusion is entertained, it can be set up in avoidance of a civil act, although entirely unconnected with it. So also it has been urged, and with a considerable de- gree of force, that a mind insane upon any subject or topic, is unsound ; that it becomes utterly impossible to know how ex- tensive is the circle embraced within the insane action ; that in many cases, the delusion itself is constantly changing, and hence its character must be undefined, and its influence unascertain- able ; that our knowledge of the insane mind is at best extreme- 572 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. ly imperfect, and hence where the sources of thought are delu. sive, our judgment in relation to the sanity of any act may well be doubted. Our experience certainly justifies the conclusion, that a partial insanity, consisting in derangement on one subject or topic, is likely to lead to a more general form of mania ; the circle of insane influence continuing constantly to enlarge, until it comes to embrace the entire mental action. When we consid- er, in addition to all this, that the laws of association are per- verted or annulled through the insane influence; that all the operations of mind, in the least degree tainted with delusion, are withdrawn from the empire of cause and effect, and beyond the limits of all rational estimate or calculation, it is certainly a rea- sonable doctrine that every act of such a mind, whether trace- able to the delusion or not, should be regarded with doubt and suspicion. It may, however, well be doubted, whether in view of our present state of knowledge of the insane mind, a sounder rule can be adopted than the one already mentioned. The effect of partial intellectual mania upon the contract of marriage, has been made a question. This kind of contract dif- fers from others, in being vague and undefinable ; in giving rise to rights, duties, and obligations, which can be but little known or appreciated until the occasions occur, out of which they arise. Many harmless delusions may undoubtedly be entertained which might not tend to render the individual less able or competent to perform the duties demanded by the marriage state. Any delu- sion connected directly with the idea of marriage, would proba- bly invalidate the contract. So also would delusions of such a nature or character as to give rise to a course of conduct incon- sistent with the duties and obligations growing out of that rela- tion. An anonymous case in 4 Pickering's Rep., 32, consisted in an application for a divorce on the ground of insanity in the wife, at the time of marriage. The proof was, that she was subject to dejection of mind and singularities of conduct. The court said they felt bound to require such evidence of insanity, as in a civil action would justify the jury in finding a party incapable of making a contract, and that the fact of a party's being alle to MENTAL ALIENATION. 573 go through the marriage ceremony with propriety, was prima facie evidence of sufficient understanding to make the contract. In the case of Browning vs. Reid, 2 Phillimore's Rep., 69, Six John Nicholl lays down the doctrine directly the reverse of this, stating that " going through the ceremony was not sufficient to establish the capacity of the party ; and that foolish, crazy per- sons might be instructed to go through the formality of the cere- mony, though wholly incapable of understanding the marriage contract." In a similar case, Lord Stowell (then Sir William Scott,) re- marked, that much stress was not to be laid on the circumstance that the party had manifested perfect propriety of behavior du- ring the ceremony, as persons in that state will nevertheless often pursue a favorite purpose, with the composure and regularity of apparently sound minds. * The partially insane should clearly be divested of no right which he can exercise with safety to himself, or those around him. It is not every kind of delusion or hallucination that can justify the law in taking from a man his property, and placing him under the care and custody of a committee. It should be one which, if acted upon, would be likely to prove injurious to himself or others ; or destructive to his property. It must, how- ever, be admitted as true, that no man laboring under any delu- sion, can be considered perfectly safe. It is impossible to pre- dict the course it may take, or the changes to which it may be subject. In all cases, therefore, the individual should be watch- ed, however slight or trivial may be the delusion under which he labors. Where the testamentary dispositions are such as indicate that they are founded on motives that might be supposed to govern a sane mind, and no insanity is apparent in them, they ought not to be disturbed, although the mind may be laboring under some degree of derangement. The effect of delusion upon criminal responsibility lias already been considered. Hoffbauer has made an ingenious suggestion in relation to the measure of this responsibility. He proposes that the delusive idea shall be considered as true, and that the &74 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. individual shall be regarded and judged, as if he were really placed in the circumstances in which he imagines himself to be. Thus, if he is deluded with the idea that he is commanded by the Supreme Being to destroy the life of a human being, and de- stroys it in obedience to that command, he must be justified, be- cause had he really been so commanded, it would have been his duty to have done so. On the other hand, if, on the receipt of a trivial injury, the individual, under the influence of a delusion originating from, or connected with, the injury, destroys life, he should be held responsible, because the injury, if truly received, would not justify the act. It is obvious that such a principle can never be acted upon in criminal jurisprudence without being guilty of monstrous in- justice to the insane. A man really deranged, who, under the influence of delusion, destroys life upon the receipt of a small injury, is no more the master of himself in that act, than if he had done it under a supposed command of the Almighty. The error of those who adopt the reasoning of Hoffbauer, consists in applying to the action of the insane mind, the same tests, and the same rules of judgment, which are applicable to the sane. Those in the slightest degree acquainted with the action of the insane mind, well know, that the practical effect of such a rule would be, in almost every case, to withdraw from the maniac that pro- tection which the law, for wise reasons, has thrown around him. Legal Consequences of Moral Mania : Irresponsibility in moral mania rests on a different principle from that of intellectual. There is here no delusion, no false assumption of fancies for facts. The intellectual faculties may remain undisturbed in their operations, while the moral are ex- hibiting every variety of derangement. This, it is true, seldom occurs ; as extensive derangement of the moral powers is com- monly accompanied with some perversion of those of the intel- lect. Nevertheless, as the one set of faculties is independent of the other, there exists the possibility of their separate derange- ment. As the moral powers embrace the motives, impulses and MENTAL ALIENATION. 0. o promptings to action, the derangement of one or more of tY±em must seriously affect the volition upon which the act depends. Actions are volitions carried to their extremest limit. They take place when nothing is wanting to render the volition com- plete, and they are themselves its most perfect evidence. With- out the proof they furnish, there is no accountability to human law ; as man can be accountable to God only for the volitions he forms in his own mind, but leaves unexecuted. The principle of forming volitions, and of carrying them out into acts, must be fully possessed to render a being accountable. When, there- fore, the first is necessarily rendered incomplete, or the last pre- vented by some insurmountable obstacle, all accountability is destroyed. It is in the first only that we witness the agency of moral mania. It is a disturbing element thrown into the very sources whence volitions are derived; and either contri- butes, in large measure, to the formation of those that would otherwise remain unformed, or prevents the formation of others that would otherwise be formed. In either way, it disturbs the ordinary normal operations of mind, and thus absolves it from ac- countability. It is not easy to define in what respect this new element modi- fies the volition or the act. The enquiry in relation to the for- mer is unnecessary, except so far as it qualifies the latter. In regard to the manner or respec£ in which it modifies or affects the latter, so as to absolve from its consequences, there can never be expected an entire agreement among writers, or think- ers, or even the decisions of judicial tribunals. I have supposed we might find in irresistibility a principle upon which all might agree. That whenever this quality should be found attached to an act, so far as to control it, the actor, in respect to such act, should be deemed irresponsible. Without moral liberty, there can be no responsibility for crime. In the normal, sane state of the faculties, this enters as an essen- tial element. In the deranged state of the moral faculties, where the sources of impulse, motive, and feeling are perverted and deranged, this liberty is destroyed, and with it the accountabili- ty for actions 0,> MEDICAL JURISPRUDEICCE. Irresistibility, where it arises from deranged or perverted a> tion, should absolve frdm all accountability, because — 1 . The act is unavoidable, and the actor therefore no more a subject of punishment, than a machine for going wrong when some part of its machinery is out of order. To administer pun- ishment under such circumstances, would shock all the moral sympathies of men. 2. One of the purposes of punishment could never . be an- swered by it, viz., the reformation of the criminal. If the act be irresistible, the whole effect of punishment upon the indi- vidual must be lost. 3. Another of the purposes of punishment would remain equal- ly unanswered, viz., the salutary effect to be produced by it upor the minds of others. That effect, instead of being salutar} , would be in a high degree injurious, as it would shock all mond sensibilities, and create a horror of the law itself which could thus needlessly sacrifice life without answering any good end c r purpose. But suppose this principle admitted, another grave subject of enquiry presents itself, viz. : How is it to be applied in practice 1 What are the tests of irresistibility'? By what indications is it attended, and how is it established in proof 1 Little direct evi- dence can be expected ; and the indirect, is unfortunately less clear and conclusive than it ought to be. It is gathered princi- pally from the nature of the act itself; the circumstances under which it took place ; the things and events that preceded and succeeded it ; the presumed influences that were brought to bear upon the actor ; and the agreement or contrast existing between the act and the entire course of conduct of the individual. This question the most frequently arises in cases of homicide, where tne plea of insanity is interposed as a defence. In such, it usually presents great doubt and difficulty, and creates embar- rassments not easily overcome. The circumstances under which the act was done will come in for a fair amount of consideration. If it were in open day, in a public place, in sight of witnesses, it would appear more like in- sane impulse, than the secret movements of the criminal. The MENTAL ALIENATION 577 impulse, it is true, might act in private as well as in public ; so that the negation of these should not be regarded as conclusive- ly proving it the act of a sane mind. If a case of homicide, the relations existing between the par- ties are worthy of much consideration. If the person slain were a parent, a child, a wife, or some near friend or relative, and no particular cause for the act was assigned, it might raise a fair presumption that it was due to insane impulse. If the individu- al slain be an object merely of indifference, towards whom no peculiar feelings either of friendship or enmity can be presumed to be entertained, the presumption, although much less strong, is still in favor of its being an insane act. The mere motiveless destruction of life can with difficulty be regarded as the act of a sane mind. If, on the contrary, a motive exist, or if feelings of enmity, originating in no delusion, be entertained towards the person slain, the presumption will be that it is a sane act. It will also be proper and necessary that enquiries should be instituted into the things and events that have preceded, and may succeed the act. There may have been previous derange- ment, or some symptoms of cerebral disease. So also there may be subsequent derangement, the very act itself being an ex- plosion of mania, which may be succeeded by clear evidence of insanity. The particular influences that may be brought to bear upon the individual should also be enquired into. The sight and prox- imity of murderous weapons have been known to excite to fear- ful activity the destructive propensity. Favorable opportunities for accomplishing the act, have been at times laid hold of for that purpose. So also contradiction, sudden and unfounded dis- gust, or some trivial, insignificant, and even imaginary circum- stance, has aroused that propensity to terrible activity. In some instances, the monomaniac is fully aware of his mala- dy, and begs to be restrained, so as to be rendered incapable of doing an act which he knows to be wrong, but which he feels to be unavoidable. In some cases, after doing it, he makes a volun- tary confession, and gives himself up to the proper authorities. In others, he takes to flight, and if apprehended, denies it. 37 578 MEDICAL JUMSPItUDEKCE. Dr. Ray, in his work on the Medical Jurisprudence of Insanity, pages 225, et seq., § 189-90, lays down some principles that may be adopted in doubtful or difficult cases. The criminal never acts without a motive. It may be the avoidance of some per- sonal inconvenience ; it may be the acquisition of property ; it may be the gratification of revenge. It is always to accomplish some selfish object. The monomaniac acts either without a mo- tive, or upon one so glaringly inadequate, as to be itself evidence of derangement. With the criminal, death is, therefore, simply a means, by which he seeks to accomplish some ulterior end ; with the monomaniac, it is entirely divested of that character, and becomes the end in view, or that which must be so regarded in a sane mind. Hence the criminal never sheds more blood than is necessary for the attainment of his object, while the monomaniac often sacrifices all within his reach, to the cravings of his destructive propensity. The criminal always lays plans for the execution of his de- signs. Time, place, and weapons, are all suited to his purpose. The monomaniac may do the same, but seldom or never, unless he is acting under the influence of some delusion. The pure homicidal monomaniac consults none of the usual conveniencies of crime. His act is the act of a moment, regardless of time, place, or witnesses. The criminal often has accomplices ; always vicious associates. The monomaniac neither. In the real criminal, there is delibe- ration ; a cool, collected, and often judicious selection of time, place, weapon and circumstance. In the monomaniac, if un- accompanied with delusion, these are all wanting.. Another leading line of investigation is the correspondence of the act with all the previous acts and conduct of the individual. Insanity, as generally understood, consists in a perverted faculty, consequent upon a diseased organ. The insane act, therefore, should stand out in strong contrast with all the previous acts done or attempted by the individual. If such prove to be the fact; if, when held up and examined in connection with the great context of existence, it stands alone, unsustained and un- supported by any other of a similar character, it certainly fur- MENTAL ALIENATION. 579 nishes strong evidence of derangement. Unfortunately, if found to correspond in character with previous acts, it cannot always be regarded as clear proof of sanity. A propensity may have been originally strong, but the organ healthy; and hence, al- though the calls for gratification may have been clamorous, yet they were controllable. Those calls, however, may have been frequently obeyed; indulgence has only added to the original strength, until the propensity is pushed beyond its normal, healthy state, and becomes perverted, deranged, and irresistible. In such a case, the act will compare well with all the previous acts of life. While, therefore, we might regard the disagreement as affording proof of derangement, yet in case of agreement, we ought not to rest equally clear in a contrary conclusion, but to resort to other indications and sources of proof. The subject of moral mania seldom arises for legal investiga- tion except in the administration of criminal law. The tests here adopted, have been already considered, and it is, therefore, unnecessary again to advert to them. The Legal Consequences of Delirium : Questions of doubt and difficulty often arise in regard to the legality of acts, contracts, and wills, done, made, and executed in a delirious state. Febrile delirium incapacitates, not so much by weakening the powers of mind generally, as by deranging their regular functional operations. Delirium, as we have al- ready seen, is usually but a symptom of some other disease, and almost universally, an acute one. The establishment of its ex- istence, during any part of the disease, throws a doubt over all the contracts entered into subsequently, and during its continu- ance. That doubt may be dissipated by clearly showing the fact of a lucid interval at the time the contract was made. The same strength of proof will not here be required to establish the fact of a lucid interval, as the law renders necessary in the case of mania. The character of the delirium, in reference to its being tempo- rary or permanent, will be a materia] subject of inquiry. When merely temporary, and only of occasional occurrence, a less amount of proof will be required. Thus in the case of Brogden vs. Brawn, 2 Jlddams' Rep., 441, 580 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. the last will and testament of a widow which was executed on the evening of the day previous to her death, her disease being acute, and of ten days continuance, on the last two or three of which, she was more or less delirious, was contested on the ground of a want of testamentary capacity. The medical testimony was divided on die subject, but the attending physician attributed the delirium to the paroxysms of severe pain suffered by the deceased, it being scarcely perceptible when these were absent, and he believed that in the intervals she had perfect capacity. It also appeared that the will had been prepared from instruc- tions received from her ; that it was read over to her, and was subscribed by her in the usual form, with a dash below. Its validity was established ; Sir John Nicholl very justly ob- serving, that " in cases of permanent, proper insanity, the proof of a lucid interval is a matter of extreme difficulty, and for this among other reasons, namely : that the patient so affected is not unfrequently rational to all outward appearance, without any renl abatement of his malady ; so that in truth and substance, he is just as insane in his apparently rational, as he is in his visible raving fits. But the apparently rational intervals of persons merely delirious, for the most part, are really such. Delirium is a fluctuating state of mind, created by temporary excitement, in the absence of which, to be ascertained by the appearance of the patient, the patient is, most commonly, really sane. Hence, as also indeed, from their greater presumed frequency in most instances in cases of delirium, the probabilities, a priori, in favor of a lucid interval, are infinitely stronger in a case of delirium, than in one of permanent, proper insanity ; and the difficulty of proving a lucid interval is less, in the same exact proportion, in the former, than it is in the latter case, and has always been so held by this court." Questions involving the legal consequences of delirium seldom, if ever, arise in the administration of criminal justice. Neither can they be said to be frequent in matters of contract or other common business transactions. The muscular debility, and great reduction of physical energy, which usually accompany the disease, of which the delirium is a symptom, place the patient MENTAL ALIENATION. 581 in a position extremely unfavorable for the performance of any action. It is in the execution of last wills and testaments that questions of this character generally arise, and here very puzzling questions frequently present themselves. In the decision of these questions, involving the testamentary capacity, the nature of the act itself, together with its attendant circumstances, are to be principally regarded. " If it be agreeable to instructions or declarations previously expressed, when un- questionably sound in mind ; if it be consonant to the general tenor of his affections ; if it be consistent and coherent, one part with another ; and if it have been obtained by the exercise of no improper influence, it will be established, even though the medical evidence may throw strong doubts on the capacity of the testator. On the contrary, when these conditions are absent, or are replaced by others of an opposite description, it will as generally be annulled, however plain and positive m;iy be the evidence in favor of his capacity." Ray's Med. Juris, of Insanity, 305,^261. In the case of Evans vs. Knight and Moore, 1 Jlddams, 229, the testator made his will on the 21st, and died on the 24th of April, of an attack of pneumonia, during the latter stages of which he had considerable delirium. A physician who saw him on the 21st testified that he was not in a state of sound mind, memory, and understanding, or capable of doing any act requiring the ex- ercise of thought, judgment, and reflection. Another who saw him on the 23d thought it extremely improbable that he should have been free from wandering and mental affection on a day so shortly before he saw him as the 21st. He, however, gave in- structions for a will, without any suggestions from the legal adviser who reduced them to writing, and approved and sub- scribed them after they were read to him. He also, while giving instructions, appeared rational, and conducted with propriety. The testamentary capacity was held to have been sufficiently made out. Those interested in looking at authorities on this subject may refer to Cook vs. Goude and Bennett, 1 Haggard, 577 ; King and Thwaits vs. Farley, lb., 502 ; Waters vs. Howlett, 3 Haggard, 79'' ; 582 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. Bird vs. Bird 2 Haggard, 142 ; Martin vs. Wotton, 1 Lee's Ecel Rep., 130 ; Bittleston vs. Clark, 2 iee, 229 ; Marsh vs. Ti/rre/, 2 Haggard's Eccl. Rep,, 84 ; Holy vs. iMy, 1 Haggard, 146. In some head affections, the patient isin a comatose state, from which he may be roused to apparent consciousness for a short time, so as to recognize persons and answer questions ; but he soon subsides into a state of sleep. In such cases, the testamen- tary capacity does not exist. So, also, in case of an injury to the head, the patient, after rallying from its immediate effects, may answer questions rationally, appear collected and intelligent, and yet, at the same time, remain so utterly unconscious, that in subsequent times he recollects nothing of it. A case is mentioned by Dr. Ray, page 301, § 257, quoting it from Dr. Woodward, of a legal gentleman who, in the course oi an acute pneumonic affection, began to have slight delirium on awaking in the morning, but it was observed at no other time. At this period of time, he requested his physicians to apprise him if they considered his case dangerous, as he wished to alter his will which had been previously made by him. They did not consider him in much danger, but it was thought advisable that he should make the alteration, and he did so. He recovered, and some months after, found this altered will among his papers, and had not the slightest recollection of ever having made it, and was much dissatisfied with its dispositions, as great injustice was done by them to two of his sons. This should certainly induce a caution against deciding too hastily in favor of the testamentary capacity. Legal Consequences of Suicide : The English common law appears, by its provisions, to have entertained a great horror of suicide. The man who had per- petrated self-murder was deemed a felon, and his goods were forfeited to the crown. He was denied christian burial ; but, without any funeral ceremony, was interred in a four-road-way, with a stake passed through the body. These severities induced juries very generally to regard the act as itself evidence of mental derangement. The law of England still treats suicide as a felony, unless the MENTAL ALIENATION. 583 fact of derangement is established. Those, therefore, who have attempted its commission and failed, are treated as sane and res- ponsible agents. Insanity, as in any other case, may be inter posed as a defence, but is not to be presumed. In the case of the Queen vs. Rumball, see Taylor's Med. Juris., 520, the prisoner was charged with attempting to drown her child. She had fastened the child to her dress, and threw herself into a canal, with the intention of committing suicide. She was rescued, and tried and convicted of attempting to murder her child by drowning. In the case of the Queen vs. Gathercole, same reference as above, a man was charged with manslaughter under the follow- ing circumstances. The prisoner threw himself into a canal, for the purpose of drowning himself. The deceased, who was pass- ing, jumped in and rescued him, but was himself drowned in the humane attempt. The defence was that the prisoner was insane, and therefore irresponsible. This was negatived, and he was convicted. So a man attempting to shoot himself, accidentally shoots another, is held responsible for it, unless insanity is shown. Suicide, in its medico-legal relations, possesses, at the present day, but little interest beyond the bearing it may be deemed to have on mental alienation. It may be either a sane or an insane act, and the difficulty lies in distinguishing the one from the other. It may be resorted to in order to escape disgrace or ruin, and a lesser evil of the two, in which case it would be the act of a sane mind ; or it may proceed from delusion, or from a sudden irresis- tible impulse, in either of which cases it would be the result of insanity. Under the head of suicidal monomania, many circumstances are mentioned going to show that there are many things in com- mon between the suicidal tendency and mental alienation, lead ing to the conclusion, that very frequently the one was only a form of the other. A fact is mentioned in the 18th Report of the Superintendent of the Hartford Asylum, see Guy's Principles 'of Forensic Medicine, 315, which further shows its connexion with general mania. Of the fifty-six discharged cured, eleven strongly manifested the suicidal propensity, scarcely a moment, 584 MEDICAL JURISrRUDEKCE. day or night, passing, but they seemed intent upon killing them- selves ; and some did not refrain from attempting it even in the presence of their attendants. The means resorted to were strangling, wounding, starving, throwing themselves from win- dows, and endeavoring to obtain poisons. Yet these all finally recovered, and were among the most perfect recoveries ever witnessed. The cases which have presented the greatest difficulty have been those in which a will was made a short time prior to the commission of the act ; and where, therefore, the effect of the act upon the will became necessarily involved in the decision. In such, if the act was the result of insanity, then it would still re- nain to be investigated whether that insanity was of such a cha- racter as to destroy the testamentary capacity. The possession and exercise of that capacity is perfectly consistent with the ex- istence, at the time, of some forms of mental alienation. If no delusion clogs or misguides the judgment, and no frenzy controls the will, a mind possessing ordinary power, or even less, may exercise the testamentary capacity. The course which courts have deemed it the safest to take, in cases of this character, is to inquire into the previous conduct of the testator, and to examine the provisions of the will. If those provisions are such as to indicate the exercise of sense and judg- ment, the will will be sustained. In the case of Burrows vs. Burrows, 1 HaggaroVs Eccl. Reports, 109, the act of suicide was committed three days after the ex- ecution of the will. As no insanity was shown at the -time the instructions for drawing the will were given, Sir John Nicholl decided in favor of its validity. In the case of Brooks and Others vs. Barret and Others, 7 Pick- ering's Reports, 94, Chief Justice Parker held that suicide, com- mitted fifteen days before the execution of the will, was not sufficient, in the absense of other evidence, to prove him insane, and thus invalidate the will. If the provisions of the will are unreasonable, or inconsistent with the previoiis declarations of the testator in reference to them, the commission of suicide shortly after its execution will MENTAL ALIENATION. 585 bo regarded as one of the evidences of a want of testamentary capacity. Legal Consequences of Somnambulism: It must be seldom that this condition of mind comes up foi investigation in courts of law. It may incapacitate an individual from the performance of the duties required by his situation, and thus impair the validity of contracts to which he may be a party. It may, if concealed at the time of entering into them, annul con- tracts of service, as it may render the individual troublesome, mischievous, and even dangerous. As the acts, while in that state, are done unconsciously, none can properly be imputed as crimes ; although for wrongs done to others, the individual would probably be held accountable, to the same extent, and on the same principle, as in the case of the lunatic. Legal Consequences of Drunkenness : As there are different degrees of drunkenness, it is obvious that the same legal rule should not have an equal application to all cases that may arise. In the first stage, where there is merely excitement and preternatural activity of the faculties, although the rapidity of their movements may prevent all deliberate thought, and produce a confusion of ideas, yet the law cannot exempt the individual either from civil or criminal responsibility. In the second stage, the senses are retained, although in an enfeebled state, but the judgment and memory, if exercised at all, are so only in the slightest possible degree. He has no idea of the consequences of his actions ; realizes little, if at all, the re- lations in which he stands to others ; and is awakened to un- bounded rage on the slightest provocation. In such a state, it is obvious he can no more be responsible for his acts than he is for his drunkenness. In the last stage, he is entirely divested of reason, and no longer conscious of his external relations. In settling the extent of legal liability which attaches to these lower degrees of drunkenness, it becomes necessary to decide the important question, how far an individual is answerable for acts done in such a state or condition as must excuse the acts themselves, but which state or condition has been voluntarily 586 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. induced. This question has been very differently settled among different nations. The Grecian law awarded a double punish- ment for a crime committed under the influence of inebriation, not only punishing the crime, but also the drunkenness that gave rise to it. The Roman law allowed the plea of drunkenness in exculpa- tion for acts committed under its influence, except in the case of women, and those it punished capitally. In the French penal code no mention is made of drunkenness, but the highest French tribunal has decided that drunkenness being both voluntary and reprehensible, could never constitute a legal or moral excuse. In Austria, under the code of 1803, drunkenness is made a ground of exculpation from responsibility when not voluntarily induced for the purpose of committing the crime. The German jurisprudence takes substantially the same view. In France, England and Scotland, a different principle has prevailed. In France, as early as the reign of Francis I., an ordinance was made declaring that drunkenness shall, in no case, absolve from the ordinary punishment of crime. The present penal code is silent on the subject, but the court of cassation, the highest judicial tribunal in the kingdom, has decided that drunkenness, being a voluntary and reprehensible state, could never constitute a legal or moral excuse. Ray's Med. Juris, of Insan., § 392-3. The common law of England, in early periods, regarded un- favorably all attempts to set up drunkenness in exculpation or avoidance of any act. " A drunkard, who is, voluntarius demo, hath no privilege thereby, whatever ill or hurt he doth, Lis drunkenness doth aggravate it." Thomas' Coke's Littleton, 46. The principle proceeded upon, and which many regard as un- sound, is that because the act of drinking is voluntary, therefore the person is responsible for whatever actions it may lead him to commit. An act, therefore, which is entirely unintentional, is visited with the same consequences with one that is intentional. But the law, it should not be forgotten, regards the act of drink- ing as in itself reprehensible, and purely voluntary. It, there- fore, lends the weight of its sanctions against the act, by refusing to permit its consequences to be mitigated or modified by it. MENTAL ALIENATION. 587 The rule of law, however, varies according to the nature of the act. A civil act is visited with different consequences from a criminal one. Courts of equity early interfered to relieve against acts done, and contracts entered into, while in the drunken state, where they were procured by the fraud or imposition of the other party. 1 Story's Equity Jurisprudence, §230; 3 Pier. Will., 130, note (Jl.) In order to lay a foundation for affording «uch relief, it was long required that the contrivance of the other party, in effecting the intoxication, should be a necessary element. This would be evidence of fraud and imposition, and hence would avoid it on the application of him upon whom it was practiced. It may now, however, be regarded as settled, that drunkenness itself, however induced, when so excessive and absolute as to suspend the reason, is a complete defence to a contract entered into while in that state. The parties do not contract on equal terms. The one has no consenting mind. It can, however, be ratified in the sober state, being voidable, and not absolutely void. Story on Contracts, § 27 ; Kent's Com., 2, p. 451 ; Pitt vs. Smith, 3 Camp., 33 ; Burratt vs. Buxton, 2 Aiken's Vermont Rep., 167 ; Dorr vs. Munsell, 13 John. Rep., 430. A criminal act is regarded differently. To such, the law will never allow drunkenness to be interposed as a defence. It may possibly in mitigation of sentence, and perhaps reduce the class of the particular offence. Story ,on Contracts, § 28 ; Pennsylvania vs. McFall, Addison's R., 257; 1 Russell on Crimes, 11. Under this head comes also to be considered the legal respon- sibility for criminal acts done while laboring under delirium tre- mens. This is a remote result of drunkenness, but characterised by most of the elements that constitute the active forms of mania. This question arose in the case of Brew, tried for the murder of Clark ; see 3 American Jurist, 7-9; 5 Mason's Rep., 28 ; Ray's Med. Juris, of Insan., §403-4. Mr. Justice Story in that case says : " The question made at the bar is whether insanity, whose remote cause is habitual drunkenness, is, or is not, an excuse in a court of law, for a homicide committed by the party while so insane, but not at the time intoxicated or under the influence of liquor. We are clearly of opinion that insanity is a competent 588 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. excuse in such a case. In general, insanity is an excuse for any crime, because the party has not the possession of his reason, which includes responsibility. An exception is, when the crime is committed while the party is in a fit of intoxication, and while it lasts ; and not, as in this case, a remote consequence, super- induced by the antecedent exhaustion of the party arising from gross and habitual drunkenness. Had the crime been committed when Drew was in a fit of intoxication, he would have been lia- ble to be convicted of murder. As he was not then intoxicated, but merely insane from abstinence from liquor, he cannot be pronounced guilty of the offence. The law looks to the imme- diate, and not to the remote cause, to the actual state of the party, and not to the cause which remotely produced it." The jury acquitted the prisoner. Another instance in which this condition of mind became a subject of medico-legal enquiry was in the case of Theodore Wil- son, who was tried for the murder of his wife, in York county, Maine, in 1835. The facts are reported in Ray's Medical Juris- prudence of Insanity, §405. He was acquitted on the ground of insanity. In another case, that of John Birdsell, see Ray's Med. Juris, oj Insanity, §406, this condition of mind came up for adjudication in the supreme court of Ohio. The prisoner had delirium tre- mens several times, and on this occasion had been drinking so freely as to become intoxicated some three days before the act was committed. He labored under several hallucinations, one of which was that his wife was in combination with three of his neighbors, and that they had conspired to take his life. He fancied that these were in the loft manufacturing ropes to hang him, and would go up, and come back pretending to have in his hands their fragments, having cut the ropes to pieces. He killed his wife in the evening, by striking her on the head with an axe. When taken he manifested no compunction for the act ; said he knew he should be hanged for it ; that he ought to have done it nine months sooner, and evinced no dread of punishment for his crime, but still continued to be in great apprehensions from the peisons who, he believed, had intended to kill him. The question MENTAL ALIENATION. 589 submitted to the jury was, whether the prisoner was capable of discriminating between right and wrong. They found that he was, and accordingly returned a verdict of guilty. The punish- ment was commuted by the governor to that of imprisonment, but previous to the commutation, he became permanently in- sane. The general principle extracted from these cases, and which may now'be considered as forming a part of American jurispru- dence, is, that where the jury are satisfied that the criminal act was committed in a state of insanity, that is to exempt from its legal consequences, whatever may have been the cause that pro- duced it : That the legal consequences of insanity are the same, whatever causes may have been in operation contributing to its production. Cases of great difficulty sometimes occur, in which an indi- vidual has formerly received some injury, as a blow on the head, or has been afflicted with some disease of the brain, which has left that organ in a very irritable condition, and liable to be se- riously affected by very slight causes. Under such circumstances, drunkenness will often produce a temporary madness, which will continue only during the drunken fit, leaving the mind in the possession of its usual sanity. It is asked whether insanity is here to be urged as an excuse, the act being perpetrated while under the immediate effect of intoxicating liquor. There are instances of soldiers, who have received wounds in the head, and who well know from experience that excesses in drinking will render them mad. What shall be the rule adopted in such cases 1 The high authority of Judge Story sustains the position, that in- sanity is not a competent excuse for crime, if it be committed while the party is in a fit of intoxication, and while it lasts. This principle is illustrated in the case of McDonough , who was indicted and tried for the murder of his wife, before the su- preme court of Massachusetts, in 1817. Ray's Medical Jurispru- dence of Insanity, §398. Some years previous to the commission of the act, he had received a severe injury of the head, in conse- quence of which there occurred occasional paroxysms of insanity, although his mind was generally sane and clear. These were 690 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. often produced by intoxication, although they sometimes took place without any apparent exciting cause. In one of these fits of insanity, induced by drinking, and while actually under the influence of liquor, he murdered his wife. The court, in charging the jury, observed, " that if they be- lieved the prisoner was in a fit of lunacy when he committed the act, he should be acquitted ; but if they believed he was of sound mind, or, if his reason were impaired, that it was caused by in- toxication only, the fact being proved, and no palliating circum- stances existing, he must be convicted." The prisoner was found guilty. This seems to have been a case in which the act was very clearly traced to a pathological condition of the brain, and this should have formed " a palliating circumstance " in exoneration. The very thirst for liquor itself may have been the result of morbid action in the brain, induced by this pathological condition. Alison, in his Principles of the Criminal Law of Scotland, page 654, makes the following sensible remarks: "If either the in- sanity has supervened from drinking, without the panel's (the prisoner's) having been aware that such an indulgence in his case leads to such a consequence ; or if it has arisen from the combination of drinking with a half crazy or infirm state of mind, or a previous wound or illness which rendered spirits fatal to his intellect, to a degree unusual in other men, or which could not have been anticipated, it seems inhuman to visit him with the extreme punishment which was suitable in the other case. In such case the proper course is to convict ; but in consideration of the degree of infirmity proved, recommend to the royal mercy." The laws of New- York, and several other states, provide for the care and custody of the person and estate of an habitual drunkard in the same manner as in case of lunatics. Nor is the committee discharged, and the property restored, without proof of a permanent reformation. The amount of proof required must be in a great measure dependent on circumstances, but as a general rule a voluntary refraining from the use of intoxicating drinks for at least one year immediately preceding the a; plica- tion will be required. 3 Edward's Rep., 380. FEIGNED DISEASES. ^91 CLASS IV. This class includes all questions arising out of deceptive practices, and these may all be summed up in the general topic of FEIGNED DISEASES. This subject presents certainly a matter of curious enquiry. It is curious to observe the power achieved by some individuals over their own organization. It is no less curious to notice the agents and instrumentalities they have discovered, or become possessed of, having the power to produce in their material sys- tems the appearances or indications of disease ; their ingenuity and adroitness in turning to the best account all such agents and instrumentalities ; and the extent of change they are capable of effecting in different parts, or in their entire systems, by a simple effort of volition. The utility of occupying much time or space in the discussion of this subject may well be doubted, as, with a few exceptions, the medical profession are seldom called upon in this country to decide upon the feigned or real character of the disease. In Europe it is much more necessary to understand this subject. The great source which furnishes the occasion from which far the greatest number of feigned diseases have arisen is the military service. The large standing armies constantly kept on foot by the dif- ferent powers of Europe have done a violence to human nature by merging the man into the soldier. We might naturally ex- pect that all the possible means which art could invent, or inge- nuity devise, would be here put in requisition to effect an escape from so unnatural a bondage. Accordingly we find Fodere ob- serving of his own nation, at the time when conscription was in full force there, that the art of feigning diseases was then brought to such perfection as to " render it as difficult to detect a feigned disease, as to cure a real one." Fortunately we are almost en 592 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE. tirely exempt from this great political evil, which brings in its train so many moral and physical evils. There are nevertheless occasions in which diseases are and will continue to be feigned among us, although they are fewer in number and less frequently resorted to. One instance is the mendicant, who hopes to be enabled by means of it to live on in habits of idleness, and to have his necessary wants supplied by an appeal to the benevolent feelings of the liberal. Another is the criminal, who resorts to them with the view of avoiding all liability for crime. So also the desire of gratifying revenge has sometimes furnished the motive for feigning, and injuries actually received maybe greatly aggravated in appearance for the purpose of recovering heavier damages. Zacchias has laid down five general rules which are extremely judicious, andt consists in, 605. difficult of imitation, 606. have reference to motive, 606. feigned cases over act, 606. observe the moral displays, 607. really insane disregard the decencies and proprieties of life, 608. sleeplessness accompanies real insanity, 608. morbid irritability characterizes the really insane, 609. INTELLECTUAL MANIA, how characterized, 492. how described, 492. INTENT TO INJURE, ELEMENTS OF, 554. INTESTINES, wounds of the, 232. inflammation of; distinction between arid irritant poisoning, 323. IRRESISTIBILITY absolves from accountability, 575. why it so absolves, 576. how this test applied in practice, 576. IRRITANT CLASS OF POISONS, what included under, 320. what substances it embraces, 320. 61S INDEX. IRRITANT CLASS OF POISONS— (ContUned.) what symptoms it develops, 321. orders divisible into, 330. IRRITANTS, morbid appearances caused by, 325. vegetable, 381. vegetable, what they are, 381. where poisonous property resides, 381. symptoms developed by, 381 . morbid appearances caused by, 382. treatment in case of poisoning by, 382. IRRITANTS, ANIMAL, 383. IRRITATION, what, 293. J. K., case of instance of moral mania, 499. JACKSON vs. KING, case of, 556. JARDINE, REV. FERGUS, case of, 82. JOHNSON vs. MOORE'S HEIRS, case of, 570. JURY, CORONER'S, their duties, 425, 624. K. KENNOWAY, DAVID, case of, 275. li fcjK.£V j J ., rase of, 225. KIDNEYS, wounas of the, 233. KLEIM, case of, 549. LABOR, when it may be prematurely induced, 101. LACERATED WOUNDS, what, 220. LANARGAN, case of, 317. LA VIGOREAUX AND LA VOISON. account of, 291. INDEX. 649 LAW, applicable to wounds, 272. cases illustrating its application, 272. On what occasion interferes, in cases of non compos mentis, 467 presumption of, 525. LAWRENCE, case of, for shooting at President Jackson, 547. LEGAL APPLICATIONS, 524. LEGAL CONSEQUENCES, of mental deficiency, 554. of mania, 568. of intellectual mania, 568. of moral mania, 574. of delirium, 579. of suicide, 582. of somnambulism, 585. of drunkenness, 585. LEAD, why interesting, 373. its compounds, 374. its tests, 374. the symptoms it developes, 376. effects of constant use of, 378. post mortem appearances caused by, 378. treatment in case of poisoning by, 379. its use for culinary and domestic purposes, 379. LEGITIMACY, consequences of illegitimacy, 79. who are legitimate, 80. legal rule relative to, 80. questions in, when and how arising, 80. what questions involved in, 81. legal rule governing, 81. LEMON JUICE, spots of, mistaken for blood, 218. LIFE, the orders of functions necessary to, 413. at what period of gestation fostus endowed with, 129. of child, by what modes destroyed, 179. LIFE ASSURANCE, how defined, 621. void from neglect to state name of actual medical attendant, 623 void from neglect to state intemperate habits of assured, 623. LIGHTNING, persons found dead by, 454. how it operates, 451. post-mortem appearances caused by, 455. LIQUID TESTS OF ARSENIC, 343. LIVE BIRTH, meaning of term, 140. ' " 650 INDEX. LIVE BIRTH— (Continued.) proofs of from circulating S}stcm, 141. LIVER, wounds of the, 233. LOBELIA, cases of poisoning by, 382. LOCHIA, what and how known, 98. LOCUSTA, account of, 289. LUCID INTERVALS, what, 526. D'Aguesceau's statement of, 526. their continuance, 527. evidence in support of, 528. LUNACY, how derived, and what signifies, 466. LUNGS, how 1 prior and subsequent to birth, 145. what changes in their volume by raspira'.ion, 150. what changes in their situation by respiration, 151. what changes in their shape by respiration, 151. what changes in their color by respiration, 151. what changes in their consistence and density by respiration, 152. what changes in their specific gravity by respiration, 154 injuries of the, 229. LYING, species of insane manifestation, 504. LYNDHURST, LORD, charge in case of King vs. Orford, 540. M. MACKENZIE, case of, 278. MALFORMATION OR TRANSFORMATION OF PARTS, 270. MALUM-REGIMEN, a modifying circumstance, 279. MANIA, active forms of, 486. its incubation, what, 486. its physical indications, 487. its divisions, 488. general intellectual, what it consists in, 489. " " how characterized, 492. legal consequences of, 568. intellectual, legal consequences of, 568. moral, legal consequences of, 574. irfAR, EARL, case of, 623. INDEX 651 MARRIAGE, eii ct of partial intellectual mania on contract of, 572. MARSELIS vs. THALHIMER, case of, 114. I MARSH'S HYDROGEN TEST FOR ARSENIC, 343. MARTIN, JONATHAN, case of, 507. MATURITY, has child arrived at, 140. evidence of, 140. MAYHEM, questions arising in, 283. statute law concerning, 283. Mcdonough, case of, 589. McNAUGHTON, case of, 545. McLAREN, JANET, case of, 277. MECHANICAL MEANS OF PROCURING ABORTION, 135. MECONIUM, what, 171. MEDICAL EVIDENCE, 624. MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE, definition of, 1. classification of subjects in, 1. MEDICO-LEGAL EXAMINATION OF WOUNDS, how made, 284. MEMBRANES RUPTURED BY INSTRUMENTS, 136. MENINGITIS, what, 389. liable to be confounded with narcotic poisoning, 389. MENSES, what, 44. suppressed during pregnancy, 45. MENTAL ALIENATION, subjects discussed under, 457. , its definition, 457. its seat, 459. its history, 460. its causes, 461 . organic or physical causes of, 462. moral causes of, 463. principle on which legal exemption proceeds, 465 forms of recognized by law, and division, 466. classification of subjects embraced in, 472. MERCURY, general consideration of, 357. its preparations, 357. its tests, 357. 6*>2 INDEX. U 42RCU RY— ( Continued.) the symptoms it develops, 359. the three varieties of symptoms of poisoning by, 360. difference between symptoms of poisoning with arsenic and mer- cury, 360. second variety of poisoning with, 361. third variety of poisoning with, 362. symptoms characterizing mercurial erethysm, 363. secondary effects of, 365. inertness of, in metallic state, 366. strength of evidence resulting from symptoms, 367. post-mortem appearances caused by, 367. treatment in case of poisoning by, 369. MILK IN THE BREASTS, a sign of pregnancy, 51. MISCARRIAGE, exciting or immediate causes of, 131. MIXTURE, a. modifying circumstance in case of poisoning, 300. MOIR, CAPT., case of, 278. MOISTURE, essential to putrefaction, 422. MOLES, what, 63. when proof of pregnancy, 64. MONROE, TIMOTHY, case of, 616. MONSTERS, what the law regards such, 20. MORAL CIRCUMSTANCES, as evidence of poisoning, 315. MORAL MANIA, 495. how defined, 496. its division, 496. general, in what it consists, 496. change in the moral powers, 497. most observable in conduct, 498. MORGAGNI, interesting case of poisoning, related by, 317. MURDOCK, MISS SOPHIA, case of, 74. MUSCULAR FUNCTION, necessary to life, 413. MUSCULAR IRRITABILITY, extinction of, a sign of death, 419. MUTILATIONS, singular instances of, 604. INDEX. 553 N. NAPOLEON, his order to stop suicidal mania, 510. NARCOTIC CLASS OF POISONS, what included under, 320. NARCOTIC POISONS, on what act, 385. usual symptoms of, 385. morbid appearances caused by, 385. chemical analysis of little use, 3t0. NARCOTIC GASES, what, 402. NARCOTICO-ACRID POISONS, 404 whence derived, and how act, 404. NARCOTICO ACRIDS, the symptoms caused by them, 405. post-mortem appearances caused by, 405. Orflla's division of them, 405. NARCOTICO IRRITANTS OR ACRIDS, what included under, 320. NAUSEA AND VOMITING, a sign of pregnancy, 46. NEGRETTI, somnambulist, case cf, 519. NERVES OF NECK, compression of, a cause of death by hanging, 44s. NERVOUS FUNCTION, necessary to life, 413. NERVOUS IMPRESSIONS, 294. NICOT1ANA TOBACCUM tobacco, 406. NORKOTT, case of, 257. NUX VOMICA, how exhibited, 408. its symptoms, what it acts on, 408. morbid appearances caused by, 409. treatment in case of poisoning by, 409. 0. OPIUM, head of narcotic class of poisons, 390. where obtained, and its preparations, 390. chemical tests unable to discover, 391. how detected, 391. how it acts, 391. how it affects animals, 392. 6."1 INDEX. OPIUM— ( Continued.) how it affects man, 392. ^ how soon it begins to operate, 393. symptoms of poisoning by, 394. quantity required for fatal dose, 394. morbid appearances caused by, 394. treatment in case of poisoning by, 395. OPTHALMIA, how imitated, 600. ORFORD, KING vs., case of, 540. ORGANS, malformations of so as to cause death at birth, 192. diseases of same, 193. ORGANS, GENITAL, state of indicating death from hanging, 445. OS AND CERVIX UTERr, state of in virgin, 56. changes in consequent «n conception, 57. " from what other causes, 57. " proofs of progress from, 57. OXALIC ACID, 334. how it acts, 335. symptoms of poisoning by, 335. post-mortem appearances caused by, 336. treatment in case of poisoning by, 337. OXFORD, KING vs., case of, 544 PAIN, under what forms feigned, 595. means of detecting when feigned, 59b. PALLOR OF FACE, sign of death by drowning, 434. PARALYSIS, how feigned and detected, 597. PARTIAL INTELLECTUAL MANIA, its peculiarities, 493. delusive ideas entertained in, 494. PARTIAL MORAL MANIA, what it consists in, 500. TARTIE3, strength and situation of, in case of rape, 3S. PENIS, malformation or defect of, 6. PEOPLE vs. HULSE, reference to, 24. INDEX. 65S PERINEUM, laceration of in delivery, 98. PERFORATION, 328. from corrosives, 328. from ulceration, 328. from softening (luring life or after death, 328. PERSONS FOUND DEAD, questions arising in, 412. PLACE WHERE BODY IS FOUND, 431. PLOTT, Dr., case of suspension mentioned "oy, 440. PLOUQUET'S TEST, what, 146. objections to, 146. POINTS to be attended to in case of suspected poisoning, 318. POISON, mode of administration in experiments on animals, 31.' POISONING, . as a means of destroying life of new born child, 189. art of secret, 289. history of art of secret poisoning, 289. POISONS, questions discussed in, 286. definition of, 287. the law applicable to, 287. statute of New-York applicable to, 288. how introduced into the system, 292. their mode of action, 293. how conveyed from one organ to another, 294. circumstances which modify action of, 299. their arrangement and classification, 320 POLLOCK, Mrs., case of, 239. PORTSMOUTH, vs. PORTSMOUTH, case of, 558. POSITION, in which body is found, to be noted, 431. POST-MORTEM APPEARANCES, produced by mercury, 367. produced by copper, 372. POWER OF DISCRIMINATING RIGHT FROM WRONG, a test of insanity, 537. ■ analysis of, 537. PREGNANCY, occasions for investigating, 37. may be feigned, 39. may be concealed, 40. sources of signs, and indications of, 40. spurious, when and how occurring, 71. libfa INDEX. PREGN ANCY— ( Continued.) when complicated with disease, 72. ignorance up to time of delivery, 74. signs of death during, 117. PREMATURE BIRTH, 83. PRKSSURE, its effect on artificial inflation, 159. PRESUMPTION UF ACCESS, and that husband is father, 80. PREVIOUS INJURY OR DISEASE, modifying medico-legal character of wounds, 27t. PiYALISM MERCURIAL, duration of, 364. PULSATION OF FCETAL HEART, its characlers, 61. PULSE, changes in, indicative of pregnancy, 44. PUNCTURED WOUNDS, what, 220. PURULENT STAGE, what and when, 264. PUTREFACTION, as a sign of death, 421. how distinguished from gangrene, 421. several circumstances that modify it, 423. PUTREFACTIVE PROCESS, objections to hydrostatic test, 156. PYROMANIA, incendiarism, 506. cases of, 5U7. Q. QUALITIES TRANSMISSIBLE, 90. QUANTITY ADMINISTERED, a modifying circumstance, 299. QUEEN vs. RUMBALL, case of, 583. QUEEN vs. GATHERCOLE, case of, 583 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS OF THE FIFTEEN JUDGES, in regard to law governing insanity, 545. QUICKENING, what, 128. why important, 54 definition of, 51. what may be mistaken for, 55. time of, 55. INDEX. 657 R RABELLO, case of, 514. ft APE, what, 22. laws relating to, 22. laws of New-York relating to, 23. upon whom may be committed, 25. what to be made out on indictment of, 25. points to which attention should be directed, 25. may be followeu ny pregnancy, 35. summation of points to which to direct attention, 36 RAYNOR, cas-? of, 264. RECTOR, HENRY, case or, 236. REDLION vs. WOOLVERTON, case of, 89. REDNESS OF STOMACH AND INTESTINES, pseudo-morbid, described, 326. REINSCH'S TEST OF ARSENIC, oiJ. RELATIONS OF BODY with surrounding objects, 431. REMOTE ACTION OF POISONS, what, 294. REPERCUSSION, what, and how done, 59. RESEMBLANCE TO PARENT, as proof of paternity, 90. RESPIRATION, prior to birth, 162. while in womb, 163. a voluntary act, 414. connecting link between sensorial, nervous and muscular functions, 41* cessation of as a sign of death, 418. RESPIRATORY SYSTEM, proving life or death at birth, 149. RESPONSIBILITY, difference between civil and criminal, 53(1. REX vs. PHILIPS case of, 128- REX vs. HAINES, case of, 245. RIDDER, JANE, case of, 520. RIGIDITY OF MUSCLES, a sign of death, 420. 42 C 58 INDEX. RODMAN, Dr., remarkable case mentione ! by, 1 .6. ROGERS, case of, 547. ROSS, SIR JAMES, case of, 621. RUST, spots of mistaken for blood, 218. SALIVATION, mercurial, in what manner it proves fatal, MHB. SAUNDERS, case of, 288. SAVINE, as an abortive agent, 133. SATTERTHAITE vs. POWELL, case of, 620. SCROFULA, how imitated, 600. SENSATIONS, in case of death from hanging, 412. SECRET POISONING, art of, 289 SENSORIAL FUNCTION, necessary to life, 414. SEMEN, how distinguishable, 30. SEMINAL SPOTS, how appearing and distinguishable, 31. SENILE DEMENTIA, when feigned, what proceeds fro n, 611. SEPARATION of the umbilical cord, 175 SEX, questions arising ont of relations of, it. SEXUAL ORGANS, blending or mingling of, 19. SHAPE OF LUNGS affected by respiration, 150. SHOT, distance between, indicates distance fired from, 24£ SYPHILIS, as proof of rape, 31. SIMPLE CHOLERA, distinction between and hritant poisoning, 322. SITUATION OF LUNGS, affeclcd by respiration, 150. INDEX. (559 SUN, state of as a sign of death, 419. changes in, after birth, 176. SKELETON, FCETAL, progress of, 108. SOFTENING, 327. SOMNOLENCY, how feigned and detected, 600. SMOTHERING, death by, how accomplished, 449. signs or indications of death by, 450. SOMNAMBULISM, 518. rases of, 520. legal consequences of, 585. SPECIFIC GRAVITY, of lungs increased by disease, 164. SPLEEN, wounds of the, 233. SPARA HIERONYMA, account of, 290. SOUFFLE, OR PLACENTAL SOUND, what, 60. its seat and characters, 6!. how imitated, 61 STARVATION, persons found dead from, 455. symptoms attending death by, 455. time in which death is produced by, 456. post-mortem appearances caused by, 456. a means of destroying new-born child, 181. SPINAL CORD, injuries to, 226. SPRAIN, what, 214. SPRAGUE, CHARLES, remarkable case of, 503. STANWIX, GENERAL, case of, 620. STEWART'S, EXECUTOR, vs. LISPENARD case of, 566. STATIC TEST, what, 145. STERILITY, what, 3. generally confined to female, 16. causes of, 16. STOMACH, inflammation of, distinction between, and irritant poisoning, 323. distention of, distinction between, and irritpnt poisoning, 324. rupture of, distinction between, and irritan poisoning, 324. water in, in death from drowning, 435. 66 1 INDEX. STOMACH AND INTESTINES, redness of, how caused, 325. STRANGULATION, differences observable between, and death from hanging, 446. whether cause of death, or resorted to afterwards, 447. whether accidental, suicidal or homicidal, 448. means of destroying life of new-born child, 186. / STRYCHNIA, a destructive poison, 407. SUICIDE, legal consequences of, 582. facts showing it insane, 509. SUICIDAL MONOMANIA, 508. SULPHURETTED HYDROGEN GAS, 403. symptoms, and post-mortem appearances caused by, 404. SUFFOCATION, a means of destroying life of new-born child, 179. SUGILLATION, a cadaverous lividity, 205. how distinguished from ecchymosis, 206. SUPERFCETATION, possibility of, 76. reasons against, 76. answers to same, 77. cases of, 77 - 78. explanation of, 79. SURVIVORSHIP, when necessary to be enquired into, 618. when between mother and child, 618. when two or more destroyed by common accident, 619. provisions of Code Napoleon in relation to, 619. cases illustrating, 620. SUSPENSION OF RESPIRATION, a cause of death by hanging, 440. SWETE vs. FAIRLIE, case of, 622. SYMPATHY, action of poisons by, 296. reasons for, 297. answer to reasons, 298. SYMPTOMS, one source of evidence in case of poisoning, 305. suddenness of their occurrence, 305 regularity in their increase, 306. uniformity in their nature, 306. beginning soon after a meal, 306. appearing during a state of health, 307. comparing them with those of natural disease, 307. developed through irritant class of poisons, 321. of poisoning with arsenic, arranged under three heads, 34" INDEX. , 661 SYMPTOMS— (Continued.) of poisoning with copper, 371. of poisoning with lead, 376. SYNCOPE, what, 426. what it arises from, 427. SYNCOPE AND HYSTERIA, how feigned and detected, 59.4. TAYLOR, case of, 620. TEMPERATURE, high, essential to putrefaction, 422. TENANT, Rev. WILLIAM, extraordinary case of, 416. TENANT BY THE CURTESY, what, 112. TESTICLE, defect or disease of, 8. one sufficient for impregnation, 9. TESTICLES, when not found in scrotum, 9. diseases to which they are subject, 9. connection between and cereuelitim, 10. structure of, defective, 10. TESTS OF COPPER, 370. THECAR, case of, 89. THOM, case of, 311. THOMPSON ADS. COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, case of, 382. THORAX, changes effected in by respiration, 149. wounds of the, 228. THROAT AND NECK, wounds of the, 227. THURLOW, LORD, his definition of lucid interval, 527. TIME, interval of, a circumstance modifying the medicolegal character ol wounds, 268. TISSUES differ in their power of absorption, 301. TOFFANIA, account of, 28i TONGUE, position of in persons drowned, 434. 662 INDEX. TOWNSEXD, Col., extraordinary ease of simulating death, 116. TRACHEA, water found in, in case of death from drowning, 435. or larynx, laceration of, cause of death by hanging, 44k. TRANCE, state resembling death, 416. TREATMENT in case of poisoning by mercury, 369. in case of poisoning with copper, 372. TUMORS AND ENLARGEMENTS, how feigned, 602. TURNER, case of, 280.- u. ULCERATION, 328. ULCERS, how feigned, 603. false, how detected from the real, 604. UMBILICAL VESSEL, what, 144. changes in, 171. UMBILICAL CORD, successive changes in, after birtn, 174, witheiing of, 174. dessication, or drying of, 175. • separation of, 175. neglect of tying, 189. UMBILICUS, state of during pregnancy, 54. cicatrization of, 176. URETHRA, unnatural situation of, 7. URINE, changes in, indicating pregnancy, 43. UTERINE, a sensible sign of pregnancy, 52. UTERINE HYDATIDS, how occurring, 64. how long retained, 64. UTERUS, changes in, on conception, 40. continuation of changes, 41. ordsr of changes in, 58. changes, how produced, 58. how appearing when examined after death, 6t morbid growths in, 72. I.NI5EX Ci** V. V A (JIN A, narrowness of, in virgin state, 15. same as connected with rape, 27. bluish tint of evidence of pregnancy, b'2. VAN ALST., vs. HUNTER, case of, 562. VENESECTION, as a cause of abortion, 131. VIABILITY, what, 115. VINE DRESSER, case of, 514. VIOLENCE, marks of, in bodies found in water, 43S. VIRGINITY, signs of, when most perfect, 28. inferences from, 28. VOLITIONS AND ACTIONS, what, 575. VOLUME OF LUNGS, affected by respiration, 150. VOMITING, how feigned, and detected, 51/7. w. WAGNER, Dr., remarkable case related by, 137. WALLACE, Dr., case reported by, 261. WATSON, V3. MAINWARiNG, case of, 622. WEAKNESS, how caused and feigned, 597. WEAPON, with which wound was inflicted. '•'-«•- employed, nature of it, 259. WEBSTER, Dr., case of, 615. * WEIGHT, of the foetus at birth, 109. WHELAN, vs. WHELAN, case of, 557, WHISTELO, case of, 91. WHITING, JUDGE, charge to the jury in the case of Freeman, 5o2. 6'H INDfcX. WILDBERGH, case related by, 311. WILLIAMS, LUCY, case of. 91. WILL, what, 559. how to be executed, 560. what diseases disqualify, 660. WILSON, case of impotence related bv 7 WILSON, THEODORE, case of, 547, 5R8 WITHERING, of the cord, when, 174. WITNESSES, either common or skilled, 625. duties of, when called on to the stand, 625. direct examination, object of, 626. " " value of, 626. cross-examination, object of, 626. duties as to citing medical authorities, 626. confessions to lawyers, clergymen and physicians, 627. duties as to confessions of parties, 627. refusing to testify, consequence of, 628. testifying to confession, 628. testifying to dying declarations, 628. before coroner; duties and compensation, 426 WOUND, was it the direct cause of death? its nature and situation, 247. its direction, 248. WOUNDS OF THE HEAD, 221. WOUNDS, what circumstances modify their medico-legal character, 267 general consideration of, 198. definition of, 199. division of, 199. medico-legal questions arising in, 235. whether self-inflicted or pnt. ?46. incised, different stages ot, zo4 - inflammatory stage, 264. puru'ent stage, 264. cicatrization stage, 264. gangrene stage, 266. a means of destroying life of new born child, 181. ;.sfe?as&