CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY Cornell University Library DS 53.R4T68 Rhodes in ancient times. 3 1924 028 550 980 Cornell University Library The original of tliis book is in tine Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924028550980 n A x.yt,-'^..'^^<:^^ U ^'<-Z7/V^-<^*2-' PREFACE. Much light has been thrown in late years on the ancient condition of Rhodes. Some three hundred and fifty inscrip- tions have been found in the island since Hamilton found the first in 1837, and these have been published in collections of inscriptions and in the various archjeological journals. Large numbers of statuettes, vases, coins, gems, etc. have also been found there within the last thirty years, chiefly in the excavations on the sites of lalysos and Camiros and of some town near the modern village of Siana ; and the finest of these may be seen in the British Museum, the Louvre, and the Berlin Museum. But no complete statement has yet been attempted of the results derived from these new materials as well as from those previously accessible. Apparently the only modern works dealing with the sub- ject are these. Meursius, Rhodus, 1675, contains about two- thirds of the passages from the classics that bear on the subject, and also one inscription found at Brindisi. These passages are heaped together without regard to their relative value, and sometimes with amusing forgetfulness of their contexts ; and the references are very vague. Paulsen, Com- mentatio exhibens Rhodi descriptionem Macedonica CBtate, 18 18, is thorough : but it is very brief and deals mainly with T. R. b VI PREFACE. political affairs. Rost, Rhodus, 1823, is careless and fragmen- tary. Menge, Vorgeschichte von Rhodus, 1827, is accurate but slight. HeffUr, Die Gotterdienste auf Rhodus im Alterthume, 1827 — 1833, and Specielle Geographie der Insel Rhodus, 1830, are thorough : but their subjects are just those on which the inscriptions have since thrown most light. Rottiers, Descrip- tion des momiments de Rhodes, plates 1828, text 1830, contains some remarks on the ancient history of the island, but the plates are almost all of its mediaeval ruins. Hamilton, Researches in Asia Minor, Pontus and Armenia, 1842, Ross, Reisen auf die griechischen Inseln des dgdischen Meeres, vols. III. and IV., 184S and 1852, and Newton, Travels and Dis- coveries in the Levant, 1865, contain the first accurate accounts of the ancient remains and inscriptions in Rhodes. Hamilton travelled there in 1837; Ross in 1843 and 1845; and Mr Newton resided there for the greater part of 1853. fiu&in. He de Rhodes, 1856, deals mainly with the island itself and only incidentally with its ancient history. Berg, Die Insel Rhodus, 1862, touches lightly on the ancient history: but the text is throughout subordinate to the illustrations, many of them very good. Liiders, Der Koloss zu Rhodus, 1 865, exhausts its subject and much else. Schneiderwirth, Geschichte der Insel Rhodus, 1868, deals mainly with political affairs and treats them very thoroughly : but relies entirely upon the classics for material. Salzmann, Ndcropole de Camiros, 1875, contains sixty chromolithograph plates of objects found in the excava- tions at Camiros between 1858 and 1865. The text was not published owing to Salzmann's death. Biliotti et Cottret, L'lle de Rhodes, 1881, briefly sketches the ancient condition of the island. The chapters on the topography and ruins are creditable ; but it is to be feared that many of M. Biliotti's facts have been sacrificed to the Abb6 Cottret's eloquence. The Admiralty Charts of Rhodes Island and of Mediterranean PREFACE. VU Archipelago (south sheet) are admirable maps of the island itself and of its neighbourhood. Heffter promised a history of Rhodes, but did not keep his promise. And a great work on the island by Professor Hedenborg was said to be ready for the press five and twenty years ago ; but he is dead and it has not appeared. The illustrations of this volume have been taken, as far as possible, from antiquities found at Rhodes which have not previously been published. I gladly acknowledge the kind encouragement and advice that I have received throughout the course of my work from Mr A. S. Murray of the British Museum. It is only just to add that his advice has often been neglected, and that he is not responsible for the faults of this book. CECIL TORR. 19, Old Buildings, Lincoln's Inn. NOTE ON REFERENCES. Inscriptions are cited by number from the following collections : — B. = Boeckh, Corpus Inscriptionum Graecarum. ■'^ F. = Foucart, Inscriptions in^dites de I'lle de Rhodes, in the Revue Arch^ologique for 1865, 1866, and 1867. K. = Kirchhoff and Koehler, Corpus Inscriptionum Atticarum. L. B. = Loewy, Inschriften griechischer Bildhauer. L._U. = Loewy, Unediertes aus Rhodos, in the Archaologisch-epi- graphische Mittheilungen aus Oesterreich for 1883. N. = Newton, The collection of ancient Greek inscriptions in the British Museum. R. A. = Ross, Archaologische Aufsatze, Inschriften von Lindos. R. H. = Ross, Hellenica. R. I. = Ross, Inscriptiones Graecse Ineditae. W. = Le Bas and Waddington. Inscriptions Grecques et Latines recueillies en Grece et en Asie Mineure. W. F.=Wescher and Foucart, Inscriptions recueillies k Delphes. Inscriptions are cited by the page and by the year or volume from the following periodicals ; — A. Z.= Archaologische Zeitung. B. C. H. = Bulletin de Correspondance Hell^nique. J. H. S.=Journal of Hellenic Studies. M. = Mnemosyne. M. I. A. = Mittheilungen des deutschen archaologischen Institutes in Athen. Rev. A. = Revue Arch^ologique. CONTENTS. PAGE I. Topography i II. Public Affairs 6 III. At Sea 31 IV. On Shore 53 V. The Gods 73 VI. Art 93 VII. Learning up VIII. Legends 139 Index 153 LIST OF PLATES. Plate i To face Title. A. Gold box, from Camiros, actual size. A. a. Its lid, with relief of Eros. Pollux says (ix. 7) that in the game of i^iavrikiy^m one player made a noose with two cords, and the other had to dis- entangle the cords by a thrust from a little stick without letting the stick be caught in the noose. See Becq de Fouquiferes, Les jeux des anciens, 2nd Ed. pp. 294 ff. A. b. Its foot, with relief of Thetis. B. Gold reel, provenance unknown, actual size. C. Chalcedony intaglio, from Camiros, actual size. On it, a stork with antlers. See Aristotle, Poetics, xxvi. 10, on does with antlers in paintings. D. Alabaster box, from Camiros, two- thirds of actual size. The gold box. A, with another exactly like it now in the Louvre, and the gem, C, were found in the I alabaster box, D, in the tomb at Camiros which contained the ' vase painted with Peleus and Thetis published by Mr Newton ' in the Fine Arts Quarterly Review for 1864, in. p. i. See pp. ^ 115, Ii6. I Plate 2 . ' To face page 1 Plan of the City and Island of Rhodes. Plate 3 To face page 58 Bronze weapons, from lalysos, one-third of actual size. The knives A and B and the sword blade D have nails for attach- ment of handle. The knife F retains its ivory handle. See page 108. PLATES. xi Plate 4 To face page 76 Bronze figure of a bull, from Rhodes and probably from Mount Atabyros, extreme height 6i inches. Part of the tail and- the lower part of the left fore leg and of both hind legs are restored in the drawing. Bronze figure of Helios, provenance uncertain, extreme height 5 J inches. See pp. 75, 76. Plate 5 To face page 112 Terra-cotta " Melian " relief, from Camiros, actual size. Faint traces of black, white, red, yellow and blue paint. See page 113. Plate 6 To face page \\Z A. Terra-cotta hydria, from Camiros, extreme height 13^ inches. Dull orange coloured clay, decoration in black with white and purple accessories, details marked by incised lines. A. a. Its upper frieze. A terra-cotta amphora, from Camiros, extreme height 23I inches, bears the panels B. a. and B. b. on either side. The panels are orange coloured with decoration and details as in A: the body of the vase is black. For other vases with Heracles and Geryon, see Klein, Euphronios, pp. 28 ff. and Mr Cecil Smith in the Journal of Hellenic Studies for 1884, pp. 176 ff. For other vases with Heracles and Cycnos, see Mr Percy Gardner in the Journal of Philology for 1877, pp. 215 ff. and Plates A and B. See pp. 114, 115. The above plates, except the second, are from drawings by Mr Robert Elson from antiquities in the British Museum. • TOPOGRAPHY. The Island of Rhodes lies in the Mediterranean off the south-western angle of Asia Minor. Its greatest length is from N.E. by N. to S. W. by S. and is about 49 English miles: its greatest breadth at right angles to this is about 2 1 English miles. I A chain of mountains runs along the length of the island 1 with many spurs on either side. A mountain about the middle \i[ the chain rises 4070 feet above the sea, and overtops (the rest by some 1300 feet: this must be the Atabyros of ijthe ancients, for it was the highest mountain there'. On the \ 'top are the ruins of the temple of Zeus Atabyrios, and a little 1 flower down in a hollow are those of another temple, probably 1 I of Athene. J The City of Rhodes stood at the north end of the island. There a long point of land runs out toward the mainland, fsome twelve miles distant. The harbours were on the eastern (side of this point, about a mile from the end. On the western jside also about a mile from the end rose the Acropolis, a 'long hill running nearly parallel to the shore and shewing an abrupt front to it, while descending gradually on the other side in terraces toward the harbours. The northern was the Little Harbour, and the southern the Great Harbour. Each opened to the north, and had the shore on the west and south and a mole on the east. The mole of the Little Harbour 1 Strabo, p. 655. T. R, I 2 RHODES. was about 500 yards, and that of the Great Harbour about 300 yards in length. The Greek masonry remains in the lower courses of each. A spit of land sheltered the Little Harbour from northerly winds, while the Great Harbour was exposed to them. As the harbour Acanias was exposed to northerly winds' it may have been the Great Harbour under another name. In late times a rhetorician talks of three harbours : one fitted for receiving ships coming from Ionia, another for ships from Caria, another for ships from Egypt, Cypros and Phcenicia". This third harbour was probably to the south of the others, and like them open to the north with the shore on the west and south and a mole on the east. Some remains suggest that this mole ran to the Khatar Rocks about 600 yards out. Starting from the east side of the point just north of the harbours the city walls crossed to the west side and followed the coast to the north end of the Acropolis : they next ran along the seaward edge of the hill and then leaving its south end made a wide circuit across the point reaching the east side some way to the south of the harbours. At the south end of the Acropolis its highest point, the walls are of poorer work and later dati than elsewhere. The finding there of a dedication' to Zeu Atabyrios has probably fixed the site of his temple. Mith ridates tried to surprise it because the wall near it was weak No other site within the city has been fixed. The temple o Isis was near the walls by the sea°. The temple of Dionyso; and the Deigma were in the lowest part of the city near thi sea, the temple of Asclepios was a little higher up, and thi { Theatre higher again and near the walls^ The positions ol the other public buildings are unknown. There are remain^ of a stadium, of several temples and other buildings, of roads) and a bridge, and of many tombs. \ Lindos stood near the middle of the east coast of the ' island. A promontory there breaks at the end into several small bays : two of these formed the harbours and the city 1 Aristotle, p. 973. < Appian, de bel. Mith. 26. - Aristeides, p. 341. ^ lb. 27. ' N. 346. » Diodoros, XIX. 45, xx. 98. TOPOGRAPHY. 3 lay between them. The harbour to the north is exposed to S. E. gales, the worst on that coast, but the small harbour to the south is well sheltered by high rocks. An abrupt hill rising some six hundred feet from the sea at the end of the city was the Acropolis. At its highest point and on the very edge of the cliff toward the sea are the ruins of a temple marked by its position' as that of Athene Lindia ; and near them those of another temple, perhaps of Zeus Polieus. The entrance to the Acropolis seems to have been by a passage carried up through the hill from an opening at its base , toward the city. On the southern slope of the hill are some rock-cut seats belonging to a theatre ; and close by the ruins af another temple. There are many tombs in the rising ground on the other side of the city. The cities of Rhodes and Lindos still exist : their har- bours have saved them. The other ancient places in the Island have perished, and the sites of few of them are known vith certainty, lalysos was on the west coast, about nine miles from the lorth end of the island". By the shore are the remains of a luole: perhaps at the ancient harbour, Schedia^ On the Dther side of the city rose its Acropolis, Ochyroma'', a long evel hill nearly two miles from the sea. There is a pillar bearing a decree ° of the men of lalysos that the decree tself and certain other matters be engraved on three stone pillars, and the pillars be set up, one in the temple of Alec- trona, another at the entrance for people coming from the ity, and the third on the way down from the city Achaea. his pillar was found on the slopes of Ochyroma some way [from any ruins, and apparently in its original place: so it [must be the third of these. The city Achaea is thus Ochyroma under another name. Ergeias" hints this when he plays on the word Ochyroma (ox'jp'u/J.a.) in talking of " the very strong {ox'JpojTaTri) city called Achaea." Camiros was also on the west coast about twenty miles 1 Strabo, p. 655. •■ Strabo, p. 655. 2 Strabo, p. 655. " N. 349. 3 Dieuchidas, Fr. 7. " Ergeias, Fr. i. I — 2 I 4 RHODES. from the north end of the island. A little cape close by is probably Mylantia', and the ruins of a mole by its side mark the ancient harbour. From this harbour the city ran inland rising with the ground along a series of terraces to the Acropolis, the highest point of the hill and about half a mile from the shore. The tombs are on the landward side of this hill and in the valley below. There is a pillar bearing a decree" of the men of Camiros that the pillar be bought and certain matters be engraved thereon, and the pillar be set in the temple of Athene and fastened there with lead. The finding of this pillar in some rums on the Acropolis has fixed the site. j A hoard of coins of Astyra was found among some ruins' between the modern villages of Archangelo and Malona. As these coins bear Rhodian types, this Astyra was probably in or near the island, and this may be its site. The har- bour Thermydron was near Lindos'. Ixia or Ixiae was tc the south of Lindos", and had a harbour*. Some consider ' able ruins, including a mole in the bay between capes Istros ' and Vigli, may mark its site. Mnasyrion was also in the south of the island®. Netteia was probably near the moderrf village of Apolakia, for an inscribed pillar' that once stood in' a temple at Netteia was found not far from there. The late' excavations near the modern village of Siana shew that there was a large and wealthy town there from early times. This' may be Cretenia : it lay below Mount Atabyros^ Places called Hippoteia and apparently Angyleia and Roncyos are' mentioned in an inscription" found near the modern village' of Embona as if they lay near its original site, which wa^ presumably in that neighbourhood. Near the modern village of Tholo are remains of a temple shewn by inscriptions"' found there to be that of Apollo Erethimios ; and close by are traces of a small theatre. Cyrbe was in the district of 1 Stephanos, s. v. JiUXmHa. « Str.ibo, p. 655. ^N. 35.. ' J. H.S.iI.p.'354. 3 Apollodoros, u. 5. 8 Stephanos, s. v. Kpr)Ti]vla. * Strabo, p. 655. •■> B. C. H. iv. p. 138. ' Stephanos, s. V. 'I^iat. " R. I. 276, 277. R. H. 43, 44. TOPOGRAPHY. 5 lalysos ; and in the plain, for it was overwhelmed by a flood'. Near the city of Rhodes was the sacred plain called Elysion'; and perhaps the fountains Esos and Inessa°. The Thoanteion was the headland just opposite the group of islands round Chalce^ The headland of Pan was on the coast between lalysos and Camiros^ The names of some other places may be inferred from tlieir ethnics which occur in inscriptions. The places whose ejthnics were Argeios, Brasios, Bulidas, Camyndios, Cattabios, Cfclasios, Ladarmios, CEiates, Pagios and Pedieus, were in the Iterritory of Lindos; as also was Netteia, whose ethnic was J ^ett^das^ The places whose ethnics were Amios, Amnistios, J \stypalseeus, Brycuntios, Brygindarios, Casareus, Diacrios, ! Dryites, Erinaeus, Istanios, Neopolites, Pontoreus, Rynchidas ,nd Sibythios were probably not in the territory of Lindos ; ut there is nothing to shew the position of any of these, xcept that Rynchidas may be the ethnic of Roncyos. 1 Diodoros, V. 57. * Strabo, p. 655. ^ Etymologicum Magnum, s. v. *E.\u- ^ Ptolemy, Geographia, V. 3. Irioi/. « N. 357. K. I. 226, 235, &c. 5 Vibius Sequester, de fontibus. II. PUBLIC AFFAIRS. The Rhodians, when history began, were Greek by race! . Earlier settlers in the island had been absorbed or expelled and the whole people called themselves Dorians and claimed Argos for their parent stated In most of the .^gean islands there was but a single city ; but in Rhodes there were three/ and it was called the island of three citie s — T/otVoXt? vaao's — just as Crete was called the island of a hundred cities. These Rhodian cities were I-inHn s. lalysos and Camiros . Then were large towns as well, as the ruins and remains of tha' age shew; but the three cities alone governed the island anc its possessions. With Cos and Cnidos they formed a religious league, the Doric Pentapolis , holding a temple in common on the Triopian Cape. Halicarnassos had once belonged to this league, then the Doric Hexapolis; but it had been expelled in very early times, and the other Dorian cities near had always been excluded ^ From this religious l eague arose a pol itical alliance main ly directed against the alien states o n the mairiland, but there is no trace of joint action here like tliat of the twelve Ionian cities further north that formed the Ionic Dodecapolis'. The Greek cities on the mainland were taken by Cyros in ^46 B.C. Rhodes and the other islands has as yet nothing 1 Thucydides, VII. 57. ' Dionysios of Halicarnassos, IV. 25. 2 Herodotos, I. 144. PUBLIC AFFAIRS. 7 fear, for the Persians could not then command the Phoe- cian fleet and had none of their own'. But this security did bt endure for many years, and Rhod es was among the con - nests of Dareios" . There was a Persian party in the island ; fi was natural among a rich commercial society of f fi t ^ rrVianLs , ffho valued sec urity above liber ty, and wealthy men, like imocreon, with a taste for court life. Leaders of this party I'ere exiled, but there is no record of resistance to the Persian leet in 490 B.C.". The Persians levied troops for the present ind took hostages for the future*; and ten years later there vere Rhodian seamen in the fleet of Xerxes on its way to Salamis". After the battle Themistocles came down to Rhodes with the Athenian fleet, and restored its independ- ;nce°. The Greek islands were soon after united against Persia Q the Confederacy of Delos. At first it was an alliance of jidependent states with Athens at their head; but as time ent on most of the allies found foreign service irksome, and istead of fitting out ships paid their cost over to the Athe- ians who suppIFed them: and thus they put themselves at le mercy of the Athenian fleet. When the pplj^pr^nnPtJ^n /ar broke out in 4^1 B.C. nearly allJJlP is1ands-o.£-^Egeaa^ id Rhodes among the m, \^^A fallpn into the. Athenian Em- ire'. So firm was the grasp of Athens on Rhodes that on ie Sicilian Expedition (415 B.C.) she forced the Rhodians to :rve not merely against their Dorian kinsmen of Syracuse it against their own colonists, the men of Gela'. The struggle between Athens and Sparta proved for the hodians mainly a question of democracy and oligarchy. In le age of the despots Cleobulos had ruled at Lindos and amagetos at lalysos'; but that was long past, and probably j^emocracy had now been established for many years. There Vas, indeed, a strong oligarchic party in the island; but at 1 Herodotos, i. I43, 174. " Timocreon, Fr. i. 2 ^schylos, Persffi, 891. ' Thucydides, I. 99, n. 9. 3 Timocreon, Fr. 3. ° lb- vii. 57. « Herodotos, VI. 99. ' Pausanias, IV. 24; Plutarch de ei 5 Diodoros, XI. 3. Delph. 3. 8 RHODES. the beginning of the war Athens had driven Dorieus and others of its leaders into exile'. Thus when Chios, Cnidos and many other states of the Aigean revolted from Athens in the summer after the disaster at Syracuse, Rhodes for the time remained faithful. But in the autumn (412 B.C.) Dorieus came down to Cnidos with twelve ships and put pressure on the Rhodian merchants by capturing the trading vessels tha* touched at the island on their way from Egypt. The Athe- nians soon stopped this, and then cruised off the coast with twenty ships to keep the enemy in check. But by the end of the year their squadron had been beaten off, and a Spartan fleet of ninety-four ships had assembled at Cnidos. The oli- garchic party in the island asked the aid of this fleet ; and the admirals were ready to give it, as they hoped to raise men and money at Rhodes under an oligarchy. So in the early days of 411 B.C. the fleet appeared off Camiros. The popu- lace knew nothing of the negotiations and took to flight from their supposed enemies. The people of the three cities were, however, soon after called together, and the arguments or the ships of the Spartans persuaded them formally to revolt from Athens. The Athenians at their head-quarters at Samos hac heard what was doing and came down with their fleet to stoj the revolt. They appeared in the offing when it was just toe late, and after a stay at Chalce went back to Samos. Rhode: paid dearly for her new oligarchy. The Spartans levied 32 talents {£7680) on the island, and though their fleet stayec idle there for nearly three months, they did not even protec the coast. The Athenians were allowed to make Chalce, a: island within five miles of Rhodes, their base of operations and from there they came over to ravage the country, oncu landing in force and defeating the Rhodians in battle when' they came out to protect their fields. At last the Spartan fleet moved ofl", and the Athenian followed itl The Rhodians being thus left to themselves tried to revolt from Sparta; but Dorieus came down with thirteen ships to keep them in order 1 Xenophon, Hell. i. 5; Pausanias, = Thucydides, vni. ,=., 41 ., ,, PUBLIC AFFAIRS. 9 and stayed till the winter'. After that there was no further attempt at revolt. In 407 B.C. Alcibiades ravaged the island and carried off vast supplies for the Athenian forces. On taking over the Spartan command that same year Lysander (requisitioned ships at Rhodes, and the year after his successor did the like. Lysander was again there with the whole Spartan fleet just before .^Egospotamoe (405 B.C.), and at the end of the war in 404 B.C. Rhodes remained in the power of Sparta ^ f Meanwhile the ancient cities of Lindos, lalysos and Camiros [had joined in founding (408 B.C.) the city of Rhodes, and had 'surrendered to it the government of the island'. Though the icities had always acted in concord, they had been separate states — for example, they had separately joined the Confeder- Ijicy of Delos, for there was a dispute about the tribute payable luo Athens by Lindos* — and they remained separate states, imach with its senate and commons, in the days of the Roman teZmpire. The Rhodians, who had hitherto been at the mercy bf the strongest fleet in the ^gean, found formidable means irpf defence in the fortifications of the great city; and the (Rapidly increasing wealth and power that enabled them to. [found it soon allowed them to have a policy of their own. \ I After the war the annoyances inflicted by Sparta through the oligarchy led the Rhodians to set the example of revolt in 395 B.C. A Spartan fleet of 120 ships was lying in the harbours of the great city; but this was driven out, and Conon who came up with an Athenian fleet from Caunos was allowed to enter. Next year Conon utterly defeated the Spartans off Cnidos, and thereby freed the Rhodian democracy from any danger from abroad. The revolt had been so unexpected that a convoy of corn coming from Egypt for the Spartans had sailed into harbour without suspicion and been captured". Some coins shew that an alliance, presumably for maintaining independence, was now formed between Cnidos, lasos, ' Xenophon, Hell. I. i ; Diodoros, ' Diodoros, XIII. 75. XIII. 38, 45. * Uarpocralion, s.vv. direinetv, &c. 2 lb. Hell. I. S, 6, II. I ; Diodoros, " Diodoros, XIV. 79. XIII. 6g, 70. lO RHODES. Ephesos, Samos and Rhodes. The leaders of the oligarchic party who were expelled at the revolt found their way tc Sparta, and urged on the government the danger of allowJ ing a great island like Rhodes to be ruled by a democracy pledged to Athens. A Spartan squadron was at length sent, over— the first that had ventured across the ^gean sinci) the defeat at Cnidos : but when it arrived oiif Rhodes (39c B.C.) the admiral found the democrats carrying all before them ashore and afloat, and cruising with a squadron twice as large as his own. After a time the Spartan squadron was made up to 37 ships and then gave some support tc, the oligarchic party. The Athenians were alarmed, and next year Thrasybulos was sent out with forty ships. He did not go straight to Rhodes, thinking he could not easily damage the oligarchic party, as they held a fort and had thd: Spartan squadron there to help them; while the democrat;! held the cities and had defeated their opponents in battle, and; so could be in no need of support'. — There is another versiorVj of these events. The year before the Spartan ships camt 1 over, the oligarchic party had risen against the democrac^ I and seized the great city, while the democrats retired to a fort ; The oligarchy had then defeated the democrats in battle witl great loss and proscribed the fugitives ; and after that hac sent to Sparta for aid as a rising was expected ^ The forme) : version is on the better authority. — The fleet under Thrasy S bulos came down to Rhodes after his death (389 B.C.) ancf gave some aid to the democrats, but the Spartan squadron was off the island most of that year, and returned again the nextl The Peace of Antalcidas in 387 B.C. must have put an end to this civil war: its result is not known, but the oligarchy was in power a few years later. The Persian party of a cen- tury before was not yet wholly extinct, for it was believed at Athens in 380 B.C. that if the Persians got a really firm hold on the Greek cities on the mainland ceded to them at the Peace of Antalcidas, Rhodes would throw in her lot with them*. But when the new Athenian Confederacy was formed 1 Xenophon, Hell. IV. 8. 3 lb. xiv. 99. Xenophon, Hell. v. i. 2 Diodoros, xiv. 97. * Isocrates, p. 75. PUBLIC AFFAIRS. II in 378 B.C. the Rhodian democrats at once expelled the oli- garchy and joined Athens'. This Confederacy, like that of Delos a century before, began in alliance on equal terms but soon tended to Athenian empire. Rhodes was now too powerful to submit. Thus when Epaminondas hoped to make Thebes a naval power (363 B.C.), the Rhodians readily assented to his plans^ At last Byzantion, Chios, Cos and Rhodes formally seceded (357 B.C.) from the Confederacy on the pretext that Athens had designs on them. Mausolos of Halicarnassos for his own ends urged them on, and supported them against Athens'. The Athenians at once made war on the seceding states, and sent out an expedition to Chios where the allied forces had assembled. There was an action on shore without result, but the Athenian fleet was repulsed in an attack on the harbour and the expedition retired. After this the allies with their fleet of a hundred ships sailed about as they pleased, plunder- ing the Athenian islands. At length Athens made an effort to finish off the war, and fitted out sixty ships to join sixty others already at sea. These went up to besiege Byzantion, but the allied fleet followed and overtook them in the Helles- pont. A general action was stopped by a storm. One of the Athenian admirals tried to attack, but the other two did not support him as they thought the sea too rough; and the affair ended in nothing. The pugnacious admiral was then incautious enough to fight a battle for a rebel Persian satrap against the king's forces. It was soon rumoured that the king would reply by joining the allies with a fleet of 300 ships. The Athenians therefore thought it well to make peace, and recognised the secession of the states. The war had lasted three years*. Mausolos used the influence acquired through his support during the war to establish an oligarchy at Rhodes''. But when he died and was succeeded by his widow, Artemisia, the Rhodians with unwarranted contempt for a woman as a ruler 1 Diodoros, XV. 28. K. U. 17. « Diodoros, xvi. 7, 21, 22. 2 lb. XV. 79. ^ Demosthenes, p. 191. ' Demosthenes, p. 191. 12 RHODES. ejected this oligarchy and tried to seize Hah'carnassos. Arte misia by a stratagem seized Rhodes instead'. She reinstate! the oligarchy, and secured it by executing the democrat! leaders and stationing a Carian garrison in the Acropolis The Athenians in spite of the late war gave the Rhodians a least diplomatic aid; partly out of sympathy with democracy but chiefly in their own interest. They thought that if th Egyptian revolt against Persia prospered, Artemisia wouh hand over Rhodes to Egypt; and if the revolt failed, th island would remain an outpost for her suzerain the Persiai king: and Rhodes in the power of either Persia or Egyp would be a standing menace to Greek freedom. Besides, the} fancied that if Athens shewed herself in earnest, neither Arte misia nor the Persian king would care to fight^ It is noi known when or how Artemisia's troops were driven out: bu' the fact is certain, for her successor, Idrieus, had to seize the place afresh a year or two later (346 B.C.)'. But in a few years Rhodes was again free and had no more troubles frorr this source, for Caria and Persia itself were soon after crushec^ by Macedon. On the first advance eastward of the Macedonians, Rhode; joined Athens and other Greek cities in forcing Philip tc raise the siege of Byzantion (340 B.C.)*. Six years latej when Alexander the Great marched through Asia Minor, the Persian fleet (then commanded by a Rhodian admiral) kepi the islands from him. But during the siege of Tyre teri Rhodian ships came to assist him^ and upon its capture iri 332 B.C. Rhodes formally submitted^ A Macedonian garriil son was placed in the city. Alexander next year promised to withdraw it', but it was still there when he died. On hearing of his death in 323 B.C. the citizens expelled it, and declared themselves again independent^ Alej^anderhad greaUy advanced Rhodes, and her most famous age now ' Vitruvius, ii. 41. « Quintus Curtius, iv. 5 ; Justin, XI. 2 Demosthenes, pp. 190 — «oi. 11. ' lb. p. 63. ' lb. IV. 8. 4 Diodoros, xvi. 77. » Diodoros, xviii. 8. ^ Arrian, Anabasis, 11. 20. ' PUBLIC AFFAIRS. 1 3 ebegan : she was no longer merely an equal of Chios or .(Byzantion, hiif i;h f Jxal^naval power of the -fEgean'. i I In the wars between Alexander's successors it was no [Jfeht thing to maintain independence or even neutrality. The aJJ-hodians easily repelled an attack by Attalos'' ; but they had yniiore to fear from Antigonos, the strongest and nearest of i^hese kings. At first they declined to join him in attacking [jCassander, though allowing him to have ships built at [(Rhodes : but when he made the freedom of the Greek cities ([3 pretext for the war, they became his allies (312 B.C.), and 3|fitted out ten ships of their own ; and in the end some degree ,of freedom was given to Athens'. But they could not risk a J, war with Ptolemy, for tVip bul k of their revenue cameJ mm )| dues on the tra ding vessels running to Egypt, and most„of ii t heir s up plies^ we re drawn thence] Solvfien Antigonos sent jhis son DemetrioB FoUorcetes to ask their alliance against I Ptolemy they refused it, saying their policy was universal . neutrality. While observing this policy in their public acts, I they betrayed their sympathy with Egypt ; and Antigonos, fearing they would join Ptolemy during the war, forced a crisis by sending a squadron to plunder the Rhodian trading vessels on their way to Alexandria, The traders, however, refused to be plundered, and beat off his men of war. Upon this he charged the Rhodians with beginning a war without provocation, and prepared to invade them. They did not ^ want to fight. They decreed various honours to Antigonos, and sent envoys to point out that they had treaties of amity with Ptolemy. Then, finding that Demetrios was actually marching against them, they granted the alliance. But Demetrios now required them to give a hundred of their chief men as hostages and admit his fleet to their harbour. This suggested some design on the city and negotiations were broken off. Still, even after he had landed on the island, they treated again before the fighting began ; but without resulf*. On finding war inevitable, they allied themselves with Ptolemy of Egypt, Cassander of Macedon and Lysi- ^ Diodoros, XX. 81. ' Diodoros, xix. 57, 58, 77. ^ Arrian, de rebus successorum, 39. ' * lb. xx. 46, 81, 82. 14 RHODES. machos of Thrace, who had been for some years in albancj against Antigonos'. Thg political relations of Rhod egjyit R ome seem to have beg iUL.aJaout-tlM»4i«ie ^ Demetrios Poliorcetes landed in the spring of 304 B.« without opposition, and established a camp and harboi' near the great city. His assaults were at first mainly directe' against the harbours. The city was for a time in grave peril but at last the Rhodian sailors inflicted such damage on th( floating siege-engines that attacks by sea were abandoned and with them all hope of starving out the garrison. Afte this the Rhodian cruisers cut off the invaders' supplies, whilf provisions were thrown into the city by Ptolemy, Cassande and Lysimachos, and reinforcements came in from Egyp and Crete. Some months were now spent in building th( Helepolis and other engines for the assaults by land. Witl these the walls were breached, and the decisive action wai fought in the very streets of the city. But at the end of ; year Rhodes was still untaken^ Mediation had already been attempted by Cnidos ant then by Athens and many other Greek states. But now Antigonos directed Demetrios to make peace ; and Ptolemy who was the mainstay of the defence, advised the Rhodian< to accept any reasonable terms. A treaty was soon mad( on the mediation of the ^tolian League, or else of Athens The terms were these : Rhodes to be an ally of Antigono against all his enemies except Ptolemy, and (probably) excep Cassander and Lysimachos : a hundred hostages for this to be chosen by Demetrios from the citizens, but no one holding office to be named : Antigonos to respect the independence and revenues of Rhodes, and to place no garrison in the| city^ I The Rhodians had now proved their power, and they used it skilfully. Though most states were seeking alliancd with them, they bound themselves to none : even with Rome ' Diodoros, xx. 84. « lb. xx. 95, 99; Plutarch, Deme- ^ Polybios, XXX. 5. trios, 22. ^ Diodoros, XX. 82—88, 93—98. PUBLIC AFFAIRS. 1$ their treaty was merely of friendship and equality*. They were thus at liberty to take either side in a dispute, and strong enough to turn the scale in most wars. Few states Tailed to conciliate their favour with gifts, and become in Isome sense their tributaries^ When the city was shattered by a great earthquake about 227 B.C. the immense gifts sent by Ptolemy of Egypt, Seleucos of Syria, Hiero and Gelon of Sicily, Prusias, Mithridates and the other sovereigns of Asia Minor, Antigonos of Macedon and by independent cities without number shewed the width of Rhodian influ- ence^ But it was not the policy of this commercial people to take any active part in the quarrels of other states : they seldom fought unless their home or their trade was threatened ; and not then if the danger could be averted by diplomacy. They interfered in 220 B.C. in the interests_oOrade_whenjthe Byzantines began to jevy^u^s on the exports from the Black Sea to Greece. War was not declared till remonstrances, backed by preparations for war, had failed. Even then the Rhodians employed very few ships, and no troops. But they incited Prusias of Bithynia, who had grievances against the Byzantines to advance on the Bosporos. Byzantion met this by an alliance with Attalos of Pergamos and with Achseos, an independent sovereign in Asia Minor who could invade the dominions of Prusias or the Rhodian possessions on the main- land. The Rhodians thereupon fell back on negotiations and left Prusias to carry on the war alone. Meanwhile they obtained from Ptolemy the release of Andromachos, the father of Achaeos, who was then a prisoner at Alexandria ; and so won over the strongest ally of Byzantion. The negotiations soon after ended in a treaty binding the Byzan- tines not to levy the dues*. Some years later, when Eumenes of Pergamos tried to blockade the Hellespont during a war with Pharnaces of Pontos, a Rhodian squadron stopped him without actual fighting". Again, Rhodes supported Sinope, another commercial city, against the kings of Pontos. When ' Polybios, XXX. 5 ; Dio Cassius, ^ Polybios, v. 88—90. Fr. 161 ; Livy, xlv. 25. ' lb. m. -2, IV. 46— S2. 2 Diodoros, XX. 81. '^ lb. xxvii. 6. l6 RHODES. Mithridates attacked the place in 220 B.C. the Rhodians vot^ 140,000 drachma (;£'S,6oo) to purchase supplies for the de fence'; and when Pharnaces captured it in 182 B.C. they sen envoys to the Roman Senate to complain": but in neithe case did they fight. Some of the ships fitted out for thf war with Byzantion in 220 B.C. were sent to assist Cnossos it Crete against Eleutherns, another Cretan city ; and Eleu thernje replied by threatening reprisals and then declaring wa against Rhodes'. In sending these ships the Rhodians seen to have abandoned their policy of neutrality. It may b that they had a defensive alliance with the Cnossians, and i is notable that the first reinforcement thrown into Rhode during the great siege came from Cnossos* : but probabi there ^»rag ^, fjnp<;tinn of piracy. Sixt een year s_l ater sev e: pirate^ips were fitted out by t he Cr^ans, and Rhodes m g^ >var onHBehalf of the tra ding~w"orld ". Piracy in general fKe RHo3iar[S~put down Tinheir own interest °, and they alsc stopped pillaging by belligerents. When Demetrios of Pharo: began plundering the Cyclades in 219 B.C., they drove him o: without involving themselves in the war'. The advance of Macedon under Philip V seemed to thi Rhodians to threaten more than their trade. They fanciec that if that great monarchy became closely involved in the politics of Greece proper, it would be a standing menace tc their liberty. So, when the Macedonians marched down intc southern Greece in 208 B.C. Rhodes joined Chios, Athens and Egypt in sending envoys to arrange a peace. For over twc years these Rhodian envoys urged peace on Philip, followin§ him about on his marches, and getting from him nothing but civil and evasive answers. They also met the Romans who were now in active war with Macedon. At last they gained their point : Philip made peace (205 B.C.) with his Greek enemies, and soon after with the Romans*. The' ' Polybios, IV. 56. u lb. xx. 81. 2 lb. XXIV. 10; Livy, XL. 2. ' Polybios, IV. 16, 19. 3 lb. IV. 63. 8 lb. V. 24, 100; Livy, xxvii. 30, * Diodoros, XX. 88. xxviii. 7. 5 lb. xxvii. 3. PUBLIC AFFAIRS. 1/ elnodians suspected the king's sincerity, and readily believed liisj admiral Heracleides when he appeared at Rhodes as a euppliant saying he had been dismissed for dissuading his lln4ster from a war against Rhodes, and gave up despatches tjr^m Philip to the Cretans urging them to carry through I heir war with the Rhodians. But as soon as the wind suited Ifiis purpose, Heracleides set fire to the dockyard and went off (jn a boat. Philip disclaimed the act, but did not dismiss his gfdmiral'. In 201 B.C. the Macedonians crossed into Asia lifVIinor and began to seize the independent cities. Rhodes Ifind Pergamos at once reported this at Rome. The Senate ItTeplied that it would attend to the matter, but referred the ilitnilitary question to the consuls ; and nothing was done^. jMeanwhile Philip had taken Cios; and while his envoys at jRhodes were proclaiming that as a proof of goodwill to the jRhodians their master would not harm the Cians, news came jin that he had razed the city and sold the people into slavery^ (After this Rhodes did not hesitate, and Pergamos and |Byzantion soon joined her in declaring war against Macedon. It was now known that Philip was allied with Antiochos of ijSyria for the conquest of Egypt and the division of its (Possessions* : so great Rhodian interests were at stake. ij Macedonian squadrons attacked Chios and Samos while jPhiHp with the main body of his fleet blockaded Pergamos, thinking the allies would come too late to save the city, if {they came at all. But Theophiliscos the Rhodian admiral, who was almost the only man that felt himself a match for Philip, prevailed on the allies to sail at once instead of wait- ing till their preparations were complete ; and the blockade was raised. The Macedonian fleet slipped away to join the squadron at Samos before the engagement, but it was over- taken in the Straits of Chios and forced to fight there. The allies, though vastly outnumbered, were stronger in ships of the largest size and far superior in seamanship ; and they had the best of the action. Thinking, however, that Attalos the ' Polybios, XIII. 4, 5; Polyaenos, v. ^ Polybios, xv. 23. jy. * Livy, x.KXi. 14. ■ Livy, XXXI. 2. T. R. 2 1 8 RHODES. king of Pergamos had been killed when his ship went ashol they lost heart and did not follow up their advantage. S1| they destroyed half Philip's fleet, while their own loss ^| slight'. The remains of the Macedonian fleet went soutt followed by the Rhodians alone, and another action w| fought off Lade near Miletos. The Rhodian ships sheerd off one by one, and their station at Lade was left in the han.| of the enemy'. While the Rhodian fleet retired to Cc Philip marched through Caria, seizing the Rhodian cities the mainland. But the approach of winter forced him recross the Hellespont. Here the allies made their fatj blunder in failing to cut off his retreat with their fleet! they might then have secured the liberty of Greece withoJ aid from Rome. After allowing him to retire to Thrace prepare for another campaign, they could merely sail over ^gina and induce the Athenians to join them in the wJ After this the Rhodian fleet went round the islands af brought them all over to the alliance except three whj| were held by Macedonian garrisons ; and then went ho^ for the winter. Next spring (200 B.C.) Philip secured 1k| passage of the Hellespont by taking Abydos. The Rhodf^ fleet moved up to Tenedos to observe ; but a single ship froil this fleet and 300 men from Attalos were all the reinforcemenf sent to the unfortunate city, though the allies could easHj have raised the sieged The Rhodians were now hesitatiri about the war, and readily listened to an embassy from tbl Achaeans in the interests of peace. They had reported il Rome the designs of Philip and Antiochos on Egypt and ii possessions* ; but Rome had so far contented herself wi Appian, de reb. Macedon, 3. = lb. XVI. 15. 6 Polybios, XVI. 35. ' Livy, XXXI. 14 — 17. PUBLIC AFFAIRS. 1 9 °iomans. These were used as a squadron of observation on 'lae Macedonian fleet during 199 B.C., but went home early for '^be winter as there was no fighting. Next year Flaminius '""rrived in Greece and the war was pushed on with more 'igour. The twenty Rhodian ships joined the Pergamene '''"nd Roman squadrons ; and the fleet thus formed, after some '"liccesses in Euboea, toolc Cenchreae, the port of Corinth, ^hile Corinth was itself besieged'. During the siege most 'Hf the Achaean cities declared against Philip, and in the "' Vinter he was treating for peace. But the negotiations fell through, and in 197 B.C. Flaminius utterly defeated him at •'tynoscephalae. The Rhodians had meanwhile retaken their I ""cities on the mainland captured by Philip in 201 B.C. Their' 'general Pausistratos invaded Caria with about 3000 mer- ''cenaries and defeated the Macedonians, who were in nearly "■equal force, at Alabanda, taking the phalanx in flank and 'Inflicting great loss. But he did not follow up his victory, %nd spent time in occupying outlying posts and villages "instead of marching at once on Stratoniceia, the chief fortress 'of the country. He thus gave time for the garrison to ^recover from its panic and the remains of the Macedonian 'forces to come in, and found the place too strong for him^ .'Peace was concluded in 196 B.C., but a year later a Rhodian ssquadron went to help the Roman and Pergamene in putting down Nabis of Sparta, who was still holding out^ In the abortive negotiations for peace before Cynoscephalee Philip offered to restore to the Rhodians the Peraa — the itract comprising their ancient possessions on the mainland — but refused the rest of their claims. These were for the evacuation of the Carian cities and of Sestos and Abydos on the Hellespont : for the freedom of all the markets and ' ports in Asia Minor : and for the restoration to Byzantion of its subject state Perinthos^ When the negotiations were referred to Rome the Rhodian envoys went further and sup- ported the general demand of the Greeks that Philip should ' Livy, XXXI. 18, 22, 28, 46, 47, ' lb. xxxiv. 26. XXXII. 16, 23. * Polybios, XVII. 2, 6; Livy, XXXII. ■^ lb. XXXIII. 18. 33, 35- 2 — 2 20 RHODES. give up 'the three fetters,' Chalcis, Corinth and Demetrias', This support by the Rhodians of claims that did not concern them very closely and their refusal of the restoration of the Peraea alone mark their altered policy : nojonger nigrely to securethecityandJUljade,_bul^^ to'^overn~th rGreeirdtie s_ofAMa-Mi -^^ ^^^ treaty of peaceTir79§^C. the Carian cities that Philip had occupied were granted to the Rhodians who now held most of them, But the Romans did nothing to carry out the treaty as regards Stratoniceia, which the Rhodians had not yet takeii, and it was Antiochos of Syria who obtained the place for Rhodes". During the war (197 B.C.) Antiochos had moved up along the south coast of Asia Minor with his fleet to support Philip and had taken many of the coast towns. The Rhodians saw the danger of allowing his forces to unite with the Mace- donians, and their envoys told him in his camp before Cora- cesion that he must not pass the Chelidoniae by sea or by land ; and that their fleet and army would stop him if he tried. These islands were chosen as an ancient boundary fixed by Athens and Persia. This bold message was put in civil terms, and the king gave a civil answer that he purposed no injury to them or their allies, offering at the same time to renew the treaties between Syria and Rhodes. Just then news came of the defeat of the Macedonians at Cynoscephalae, so the Rhodians saw no further need for the present of opposing the advance of Antiochos. They merely helped the cities threatened by him, sending information of his movements to some and auxiliaries to others". -The war did not begin k, earnest till 192 B.C. At first the Rhodians had little share * it : their squadron was too late for the defeat of the Syrial fleet by the Roman and Pergamene off Cyssos in 191 B.6, and merely joined in blockading the enemy at Ephesos'. They sent out thirty-six ships under Pausistratos in good time ' Appian, de reb. Macedon, 6. jo. 2 Polybios, XXXI. 7; Livy, xxxiii. ■> Livy, xxxvi. 45; Appian, de reb. 18, 30. Syria, 22. ' Polybios, xviii. 24; Livy, xxxiii. PUELld AFFAIRS. 21 next year. These were surprised in harbour at Samos through the treachery of the Syrian admiral Polyxenidas, a Rhodian exile ; and only seven ships escaped, while Pausistratos himself was killed. Twenty fresh ships were sent out in a few days, and these joined the Romans at Samos, and went with them to make a demonstration off Ephesos. Polyxenidas did not respond, and there seemed so little chance of further fighting that some of the Rhodian ships were detached to act as convoys*. A descent on Patara, the metropolis of Lycia, was now planned, with the double object of capturing the ships fitting out there for Antiochos, and of setting free the Rhodian forces employed in defending their possessions on the mainland against the Lycians. Some Roman and Rhodian ships came down from Ephesos, picked up others at Rhodes and sailed for Patara. A storm prevented them from making the harbour and they ran for shelter to Phcenicos : there they had a struggle to keep off the citizens and some Syrian troops, and so went on to Telmessos. After this miscarriage the design on Patara was given up. Later on the main body of the Roman fleet was brought down to seize the place ; but after getting as far as Loryma, just opposite Rhodes, the admiral found an excuse for going backl Meanwhile the Syrians had laid siege to Pergamos. The Roman and Rhodian fleet moved up to Elsea to support the city, and then to Adramyttion when that place was threatened: but the Syrians retired, and the fleet returned to Samos. During this siege Antiochos offered to treat for peace, and the Rhodians were ready to come to terms, but Eumenes of • Pergamos utterly refused and the matter ended'. The fleet coming up from Syria under Hannibal was now expected. The Rhodian ships at Samos went home to wait for it ; but were sent on with the others, thirty-six in all, first to Phaselis, which was untenable for fever, and then to the mouth of the Eurymedon. Hannibal soon came up with forty-three ships, most of them larger than his opponents'. In the 1 Livy, xxxvil. 9—14; Appian, de * Polybios, xxi. 8; Livy, xxxvii. teb. Syria, •24, 25. 18 — 21. ' lb. XXXVII. 15 — 17. 22 RHODES. action the Rhodians at first fell into confusion in forming, but as soon as they were fairly engaged, the better build of their ships and their seamanship told, and more than half the enemy's fleet was disabled. They could not follow up their victory as most of their rowers were weak after the fevers. Hannibal went on to Patara, and a Rhodian squadron lay off there to prevent a junction with Polyxenidas. The Romans would have nothing more to do with Patara, though the Rhodian admiral was ordered to use all his influence to bring them there'. The operations round Ephesos soon after ended in the decisive action off Myonnesos. The Syrian fleet of eighty-nine ships under Polyxenidas engaged the allied fleet of eighty ships, — twenty-two of them Rhodian and the rest Roman. At first the S5'rians were likely to outflank the Romans, but the Rhodians threw part of the enemy's line into confusion, and then the Romans broke through and took it in the rear. In the end nearly half the Syrian fleet was sunk, burnt or taken. The Rhodian squadron next went to the Hellespont to help in transporting the Roman troops into Asia, and then went horned Scipio soon after defeated Antiochos with a loss of fifty thousand men at Magnesia. Polyxenidas, seeing that the war was over, retired from Ephesos and sailed as far as Patara ; but hearing there that a Rhodian squadron was cruising near Megiste, he left his ships and continued his retreat overlandl By the treaty of peace Antiochos gave up his fleet, and the Syrian ships at Patara, to the number of fifty, were burnt there by the Romans'*. After the defeat of Antiochos Rhodian envoys arrived in Rome and were received with honours second only to those granted to Eumenes of Pcrgamos. The Rhodians asked for the independence of the Greek cities in Asia Minor, intendinf.. to be first their patrons and afterwards their sovereigns ; while' Eumenes, who was already the sovereign of some of them and had designs on the rest, of course opposed this. They 1 Livy, xxxvn. 22 — 24; Appian, de reb. Syria, 27. leb. Syria, 22, 28. s lb. xxxvij. 45. 2 lb. XXXVII. 29—31; Appian, de * lb. xxxviii. 39. PUBLIC AFFAIRS. 23 also asked for the independence of Solce, with a view to getting a hold on Cilicia; but did not press the claim. The Senate, by way of compromise, granted Lycia and Caria as far as the Mzeander to the Rhodians and the rest of the dominions of Antiochos west of IVIount Tauros to Eumenes: and confirmed the independence of all the Greek cities of Asia Minor that had paid tribute to Antiochos except those that had previous- ly been tributaries of Pergamos. Ten commissioners went over to Asia Minor to settle the details\ The treaty of peace made upon their report in 189 B.C. excepted Telmessos from the grant of Lycia to Rhodes, the Romans having meanwhile seized the place and given it to Eumenes^ When the Carians and Lycians were thus handed over to Rhodes, their relations with her were not clearly settled; and while they sent envoys suggesting an alliance, she sent comrnjssioners to regulate their affairs^ A war followed; and when the Lycians were beaten they complained at Rome of Rhodian oppression. The Senate pointed out to the Rhodians that by the records of the ten commissioners the Lycians were to be their friends and allies, and not their slaves. On hearing this the Lycians took up arms again and seem to have been fighting for the next three years. The Rhodians thought the Senate had been misled and sent envoys to Rome to argue the point*. Rhodes now became somewhat estranged from Rome. The growth of Roman power in the East clearly threatened Rhodian independence, and a strong party in the island held that the true policy for the Rhodians was to support the other states of the East against Rome, and if necessary to oppose her themselves. Thus when Perseus, the young king of Macedon, married Laodiceof Syria, the bride was escorted to hernewhome' by the Rhodian fleet, which had been fighting a few years be- fore against the Macedonians and Syrians : and then there were ostentatious manoeuvres of the whole of this fleet as a hint to the Romans^ The estrangement of Rhodes from Pergamos, 1 Polybios, XXI. 14, xxii. 1—7; xxxviii. 38, 39. Livy, xxxvn. 52 — 56; Diodoros, xxix. ' Polybios, xxiii. 3. 11; Appian, de reb. Syria, 4+. ' lb. xxvi. 7, 8; Livy, XLI. 6, 25. 2 Polybios, xxn. 26, 27; Livy, » polybios, XXVI. 7. 24 RHODES. the firm ally of Rome, had begun in the contest for Asia Minor. Then the attempt of Eumenes to blockade the Hellespont during his war with Pharnaces was an interference with com- merce that a Rhodian squadron had checked almost by force. Moreover, Pergamene troops ostensibly sent to assist the Rhodians against the Lycians had been plundering in the Pera;a\ At last when Eumenes brought on the war between the Romans and Perseus in 171 B.C., his sacred- embassy to the festival of Helios at Rhodes was turned back^ and he was violently attacked by a Rhodian envoy before the Roman Senate. In this attack the envoy shewed too much sympathy with Perseus, and another was sent to protest the fidelity of Rhodes to Rome. But the Roman legates who were then in the island to renew the treaties of friendship, reported that the people were wavering'. A strong partizan of Rome, however^ just then became head of the Rhodian government, and deter- mined its policy for a time. Further legates who came from Rome to secure the assistance, or at any rate the neutrality, of a fleet of forty ships then fitting out at Rhodes, went back convinced that the people could be trusted. Envoys sent by Perseus to suggest that the Rhodians might arrange terms of peace and if necessary enforce them, were dismissed with an answer that though Rhodes desired peace she could not en- danger her friendship with Rome. Five Rhodian ships were .sent to the Roman admiral when he asked for them. His request had not been forwarded by the proper official, and the anti-Roman party fixed on this irregularity to cast doubts on the authenticity of the despatch : not doubting it them.selves, but wishing to shew the Romans that Rhodes would not go out of her way to help them. The ships soon returned as there was no fighting*. As the war dragged on and was more and more mismanaged by the Roman commanders, the Rho- dians declared themselves more plainly; and it became noto- rious in Rome that parties were now nearly evenly balanced in the island. But the Senate ignored this, and confirmed the 1 Polybios, XXV. 5, xxvii. 6. <> Polybios, xxi'ii. 3, 4, 6 • U\y " Appian, de reb. Macedon, 9. XLU. 45, 46, 56. ' ' ' ' Livy, XLII. 14, 19, 26. PUBLIC AFFAIRS. 25 treaty of friendship with the Rhodians in i5g^.C. without remark, and also gave thenii£asieJ;a_ex£ort_corn from Sicily. But the Consul Quintus Marcius very curiously hinted to a Rhodian envoy at his camp that Rhodes might arrange a peace, as she was the power from whom an offer of mediation could best come; and privately asked him to mention the matter at home. Rhodes soon after offered to mediate be- tween Egypt and Syria, who were now at war, but nothing was then done as to Rome and Macedon\ The Consul's request came to the ears of the anti-Roman party and con- firmed their opinion that Rome was unequal to the task before her. They went so far as to inform Perseus, who was now in alliance with Genthios of Illyria, that they were ready to join him in the war. Envoys from these kings were received with marked honour at Rhodes; and after a stormy debate on their proposals for an alliance against Rome, the anti-Roman party carried the day. Rhodian envoys were sent to Perseus and the Consul at the seat of war and to the Roman Senate^ Before the Senate they spoke as a superior power, saying they had determined to put an end to the war in the interests of commerce and would attack any state that declined their mediation". The Consul was even more angry than the Senate when the Rhodians arrived with their message a few days before the battle of Pydna, but he merely said he would answer in a fortnight*. After his victory the envoys who were still in Rome were sent for by the Senate. Their chief calmly said they had desired peace in the best interests of Rome, and now had only to congratulate the Romans on their glorious victory. They at once retired without waiting for an answer, but the Senate replied by a despatch pointing out the facts °. The blunder of the Rhodians lay less in their action against Rome than in the time of taking it. Had war followed then, they could perhaps have destroyed several Roman fleets 1 Polybios, xxviii. ■2, 14, 15, 19; ^ Livy, xLIV. 14; Diodoros, XKX. 24; Appian, de reb. Macedon, 15. Dio Cassius, Fr. 159. 2 lb. XXIX. 2, 4, 6; Livy, XLIV. 23, * Uvy, XLIV. 35. ig. " Polybios, XXIX. 7; l-ivy, xlv. 3. 26 RHODES. before they submitted; but they might have checked the east- ward advance of the Romans for many years, had they joined Perseus while he was still successful. It was believed at Rome that the suggestion of mediation to the Rhodians by the Consul Quintus Marcius was intended simply to make them commit themselves^ Some Roman legates now refused to touch at the island on their way to Egypt, and went to Loryma on the mainland instead. The Rhodians at last per- suaded them to cover over, and on a hint from one of them ordered the execution of all who had spoken or acted against Rome during the war. Many had anticipated this decree by flight or suicide, but it was carried out as far as might be''. At Rome a Praetor would have proposed to the people a war against Rhodes, had not a Tribune of the Plebs very irregu- larly pulled him down from the rostrum. This Tribune then introduced to the Senate some further envoys from Rhodes who had previously been refused audience and ordered to leave the city. The senators who had served in the war were bitterly opposed to Rhodes, and she would have fared badly had not Cato taken her part. He reminded them that Rhodes had not actually taken up arms, and could not in any case be blamed for protecting her independence'. In the end the Senate cancelled the treaty of friendship with the Rhodians and ordered them to evacuate those parts of Caria and Lycia granted them after the war with Antiochos. Their admiral came over next spring (167 B.C.) to negotiate a treaty of alliance now that a treaty of friendship was out of the question, for they thought it necessary to determine their relations with Rome even at the cost of fettering their policy for the future. Meanwhile they put down a revolt of Caunos, Mylassos and Alabanda, fearing that if they lost Caria and Lycia their other possessions would revolt or be seized by the neighbouring states; but the negotiations at Rome for the treaty hindered them from crushing the rebels*. An order for the evacuation 1 Polybios, xxvni. 15. Cataline, 51. " Livy, XLV. 10; Dio Cassius, Fr. ^ Polybios, xxx. 4, 5 ; Livy, XLV. '^°- -20— 25; Dio Cassius, Fr. i6i. 3 Aulus Gellius, VI. 3; cf. Sallust, PUBLIC AFFAIRS. 2/ of Caunos and Stratoniceia was then obtained from the Roman Senate by those cities, and the Rhodians who were still anxious for the success of the negotiations, obeyed. The alliance was refused for the present, but was granted a year later (164 B.C.) chiefly through the influence of Tiberius Gracchus. Rome had deprived the Rhodians of Caunos and Stratoniceia as well as of the territory she had herself granted them twenty-five years before ; and also of all return for their sacrifices in putting down the revolts in Lycia and for the money spent there. She had also damaged them indirectly by proclaiming Delos a free port to divert trade from the island. None of these measures were withdrawn, though a year later the Rhodian claims to private property in Lycia and Caria were allowed by the Senate and the city of Calyd- nos was permitted to exchange Caunos for Rhodes as its sovereign. But the power of the island was not broken, though it suffered in repute'. Rhodes had been on good terms with Crete during the war between Perseus and the Romans, sending envoys in 168 B.C. to the several Cretan cities as well as to the assembled Cretans to renew their treaties of friendship. A dozen years later Rhodes declared war against the Cretans as pirates : but some reverses reduced her to despondency, and she sought foreign aid. The Achseans were inclined to assist her, but could do nothing without the consent of Rome. The Romans would do nothing decided, and the most that the Rhodian admiral could obtain from the Senate (153 B.C.) was an offer of mediation. Meanwhile the Rhodians had probably dropped the war, for some of the ships they had fitted out for it went in 154 B.C. to assist the Pergamene fleet against Prusias". The reputation of Rhodes was restored by her resistance to Mithridates. The king easily occupied the whole of Asia Minor (88 B.C.) but his progress southward by sea was stopped at Myndos by the Rhodians. His fleet was the stronger, but the ships were badly built and the sailors no match for their opponents ; and he was completely defeated'. When the ' Polybios, XXX. ip.xxxi. 1,7, 16,17. " Memnon, Fr. 31; Appian, de bel. 2 lb. XXIX. 4, xxxui. II, 14, 15. civ. iv. 71, 28 RHODES. Romans were shortly afterwards massacred throughout Asia Minor by his order, the few that escaped found refuge at Rhodes. The great city was at once prepared for a siege, and was soon attacked. The Rhodian fleet was almost surround- ed when it went out to oppose the landing of the enemy and had to retire without fighting; and in the small engagements that occurred during the siege it gained only slight advan- tages. Following the example of Demetrios, Mithridates pitched his camp close to the city and made his first attacks by sea. The citizens repulsed these and destroyed the float- ing siege-engines: they baffled an attempt to surprise the harbours and the Acropolis by a night attack : and at last they forced the king to raise the siege'. Next year Rhodes sup- plied LucuUus with three ships when he went round to stir up the allies of Rome, and then with some part of the fleet •with which he gained successes in 85 B.C. off Lectum and again off Tenedos^ At the peace (84 B.C.) the Rhodians received some reward from Sulla for their fidelity to the Romans': probably the confirmation of their title to Caria and Lycia, for Caunos was in revolt against Rhodes soon after*. When Mithridates renewed hostilities with the Ro- mans, twenty Rhodian ships served against him at the siege of Heracleia'. Rhodes next became involved in the party politics of Rome. The leaders of the Civil War were well known in the island; but the people merely desired to be on the winning side and did not follow either party very eagerly. Pompey was popular for his campaign against the pirates in 67 B.C., in which many Rhodians had served under him^; and when he raised forces in the East in 49 B.C. to oppose Caesar, Rhodian ships formed one of the squadrons of his fleet. This squadron was wrecked in the Adriatic, and Caesar then gained some favour by sending the survivors of the crews safe home'. There were also Rhodian troops among Pompey's forces at 1 Appian, de bel. Mith. 24—27. s Memnon, Fr. 50. ^ Plutarch, Lucullus, 2,3. 6 Florus III 6 3 Appian, de bel. Mith. 61. 7 c^,„; je bei. civ. ,11. 5, ^6, «. * Strabo, p. 651. ..> 1 / PtTBLIC AFFAIRS. 29 Pharsalos. After the battle Pompey himself escaped from Lesbos on Rhodian ships'; but when some of his party came to Rhodes, the people sent them off, thinking it was high time to change sides. When Caesar crossed to Egypt soon after this, it was with ten Rhodian ships^ One of these deserted on the way, but the rest did all the hardest fighting at the cap- ture of Alexandria. Their admiral was afterwards lost with his ship in an action off the Canopic mouth of the Nile, but the others went on with Caesar to his African campaign ^ After Caesar's death the Rhodians fitted out ships for Dola- bella in 43 B.C., but refused any to Cassius; saying, when he pressed his demand, that they would be no parties to a civil war and had merely intended the ships with Dolabella as an escort. Upon this Brutus and Cassius determined to crush Rhodes before they marched on Rome: partly to secure their advance from the Rhodian fleet, and partly to fill their mili- tary chest. The populace thought they could resist Cassius as well as Demetrios or Mithridates, but the more sensible people dreaded a contest with Romans. After abortive nego- tiations at Myndos, where Cassius was fitting out, the Rho- dians attacked the Roman fleet there. At first their seaman- ship gave them the advantage; but they were far inferior in the number and size of their vessels, and at length retired with a loss of five ships. In another action when the enemy approached the island they lost two more ships. The great city was then invested by sea and land; and its capture was inevitable, for there had not been time to provision it. It was believed that some of the leading men, knowing that resist- ance was hopeless, agreed to open the gates. At all events, the Romans suddenly appeared in the middle of the "city. Cassius kept his troops in order, and beyond executing some fifty of the citizens and proscribing a few more, did no harm to the city or the people: but he seized all gold and silver, clearing the temples and the treasury and even the wells and tombs in which valuables had been hidden. He left 3000 legionaries to hold the city, and then went on his way to 1 Appian, de bel. civ. 11. 7r, 83. ^ Auhis Hirtius, de bel. Alexand. = CjEsar, debel. civ. III. 102, 106. 11— IS. ^5 ; de bel. Afric. 20. 30 RHODES. Philippi'. After the battle this garrison was withdrawn; Cassius Parmensis had carried off all the Rhodian ships he could man and burnt the rest, and it no longer mattered what side Rhodes might take". The Rhodians never recovered from this blow. Antony granted them several islands as some compensation for their losses: but these they governed so harshly that he revoked the grant'. Under the Empire Claudius withdrew their inde- pendence in 44 A.D. because they had crucified Romans, but in 53 he restored if*; and after that it was several times forfeited for intrigues against Rome and then regained by services in war^ At last Vespasian placed Rhodes among the Roman provinces''. 1 Appian, de bel. civ. IV. 6o — 74; Claudius, 25. Dio Cassius, XLVii. 33. ° Tacitus, Annates, xn. 58. ^ Appian, de bel. civ. v. 2. ^ Eutropius, VII. 19 ; Suetonius, Ves- ^ lb. de bel. civ. v. 7. patian, 8. " Dio Cassius, LX. 24; Suetonius, III. AT SEA. In the lists of powers holding the Thalassocratia, the sovereignty of the seas, Rhodes stands sometimes fourth and sometimes fifth, holding it fnr fwpn<-3^-#Hs«<'=-y^nr-'i nbniit 900_RC.' This probably means that the power standing next below Rhodes in the lists began to be reckoned among the sovereigns of the seas twenty-three years after Rhodes was itself first reckoned among them. This Thalassocratia could be claimed on many grounds, and it is not clear on what grounds it is here assigned to Rhodes. More is learnt from the statement that before the Olympic games were founded (.' 884 B.C.) the Rhodians for years together sailed far from home for the safety of mankind, voyaging a ^; far as .Spai n and founding divers colonies ^ T he use of naval power for putt ing dosgx.^>i*acy and f or trade and colonization gave a claim t o the Thalassocra tia. Little is known of the Rhodian colonization of this age in the West. There was Rhodos, Rhode, or Rhoda at the north- east corner of Spain ^ Rosas inherits the name, but the site of the old town is toward the headland at San Pedro de Roda. It was doubted in ancient times whether it was founded by Rhodes or by the neighbouring city of Emporion, itself a colony of the Phocaeans of Massalia (Marseilles). The place • Eusebios, anno iioo. Syncellos, ' lb. pp. 160, 654; Pomponius Mela, p. 181. II. 6; Stephanos, s.v. 'PiS?;. ' Strabo, p. 654. 32 RHODES. fell into the hands of the Massaliots, and the belief that it was founded by them may have arisen after that. There was also Rhode, Rhoda, or Rhodanusia somewhere near Massalia itself. It was also doubted whether this was a colony of Rhodes or of Massalia. It was said that the city had its name from Rhodes and gave it to the Rhodanos (the Rhone); but it seems more likely that the river gave the name to the city, and that the name then suggested Rhodes as the parent state. The Rhodians also founded Parthenope among the Opici". This Parthenope would be Neapolis (Naples). That city, however, was commonly held to be a colony of Cuma, and it may be that these settlers founded the neighbouring Palaeopolis. On the other side of Italy, Salapia, just to the south of the Lago di Salpi by the Gulf of Manfredonia, was founded by colonists from Rhodes and Cos under a certain Elpias in one ancient account; but in another Diomed founded it together with Canusium and Arpi, of which it was the port'. Lastly, the Rhodians under Tlepolemos after the return from Troy planted colonies in the parts about Sybaris on the Gulf of Taranto and in the Balearic Islands*. Other states joined Rhodes in sending out some later colonies ; and it may be that in these early migrations the colonists were of several stocks and that each stock afterwards claimed for itself alone the honour of founding the city. The Rhodian colonization in Sicily belongs to a later age and is well known. Their chief colony was Gela ; for a time the most powerful city in Sicily and itself the founder of Camarina and Acragas. When Greek colonists first came to the island they planted five Greek cities there in little more than five years. These were all upon the eastern coast. There was a pause for nearly forty years, and then a body of Dorians from Rhodes and Crete founded Gela (Terranova) about the middle of the south coast (690 B.C.). Antiphemos the Rhodian and Entimos the Cretan were reverenced to- gether as joint founders ; but the Rhodians probably had the 1 Strabo, p. i8o; Pliny, in. 4; Ste- ' lb. p. 654; Vitruvius, I. 39. phanos, s. v. 'Podavovala. ' Aristotle, p. 840; Strabo, p. 654; ' Strabo, p. 6^4. Silius Italicus, in. 364. AT SEA. 33 greater share in the colony, for the Acropohs was called Lindice after Lindos, which was the city of Antiphemos and his followers. The name Gela was taken from the river close by\ In the Sicilian Expedition of 415 B.C. both Rhodians and Cretans fought for Athens against the Geloans who were fighting for Syracuse: the Rhodians from necessity, the Cretans for pay^ Further to westward on the south coast, Acragas, afterwards Agrigentum and now Girgenti, was founded by the Geloans in 582 B.C., and the Dorian customs that their fathers had brought from Rhodes were established in the new city'. The statement that Acragas was colonized directly from Rhodes is on less authority*. But the famous bronze bull of Phalaris recalls certain bronze kine that bellowed on mount Atabyros in Rhodes ; while Phalaris himself seems to have been born at Astypalsea near Rhodes, and to have been building a temple to that great god of Lindos, Zeus Polieus, when he seized the supreme power at Acragas^: and no doubt many Rhodians came over to help the Geloans in peopling their new colony. Camarina also lay on the south coast, but to the east of Gela. Its ruins are not far from Vittoria. It was at first a colony of Syracuse, but the colonists revolted against their parent state and were expelled. Hippocrates, the despot of Gela, acquired the place in 492 B.C. in exchange for the Syracusan prisoners taken at the Heloros, and planted there a colony of Geloans. Seven years later these colonists were transported to Syracuse, which had been seized by Gelon, the successor of Hippocrates ; and Camarina was destroyed. But on the fall of the Gelonian dynasty in 465 B.C. Camarina was refounded by Gela, and probably peopled with its former colonists who had now been expelled from Syracuse. This Gelon, the greatest sovereign of the age, and Hiero, the brilliant despot of Syracuse, were de- scended from a native of Telos near Rhodes who had come 1 Thucydides, VI. 3, 4; Herodotos, ^ Polybios, IX. 27. VII. 153. ° Pliny, xxxiv. 19; Scholia to Pin- ^ Thucydides, VII. 57. dar, Ol. VII. 87; PolyKnos, v. i ; cf. ' lb. VI. 4. Epistles of Phalaris, 4, 119. T. R. 3 34 RHODES. over to Gela with Antiphemos'. The city of Inessa on the southern slopes of Etna, commonly called a colony of Syra- cuse, was said to take its name from the fountain at Rhodes^ About 580 B.C. a body of colonists from Rhodes and Cnidos sailed for Sicily and landed at the western end of the island. They found Selinos at war with Egesta, and took part with Selinos. Many of them were killed when the Selinuntines were defeated in battle ; whereupon the rest agreed to go home again, and sailed off round the north coast of Sicily. On their way they touched at the island of Lipara, and were welcomed there by the Children of iEolos. These now num- bered only five hundred, and the new comers joined them in founding their city afresh. The Cnidians probably outnum- bered the Rhodians in this colony, for the leader was a man of Cnidos, and when he fell in the battle three of his kinsmen succeeded him'. Passing over a vague statement that in Macedonia there dwelt a race of Cypriots and Rhodians*, no records remain of any other distant colonies of Rhodes but Apollonia and Naucratis. Apollonia, now Sizeboli, on the Roumelian coast of the Black Sea, was founded in 609 B.C. by Milesians and Rhodians'. Probably few of these colonists came from Rhodes, as the place is also called a colony of Miletos alone. The ruins of Naucratis have lately been found near Teh el Barud in the Delta of the Nile. The city seems to have been founded in the reign of Psametik I. (666 — 612 B.C.) by a body of Mile- sians'. It was never a colony in the usual sense, but merely a trading station : Miletos had no exclusive claim on the place and was not among the nine cities that were presidents of the market and founded the chief temple there, the Hel- lenion. Four of the nine cities were Doric : Rhodes, Cnidos, Halicarnassos and Phaselis'. As to these four: Cnidos and Halicarnassos belonged to the Doric Hexapolis ; Phaselis was ^ Thucydides, VI. 5; Herodotos, VII. ^ Epiphanios, contra h^ereses, p. 150. 153 — 156; Diodoros, XI. 76. ' Stephanos, s.v.'AwoWavla. - Vibius Sequester, de fontibus. ^ Strabo, p. Soi. ' Diodoros,' V, 9. 7 Herodotos, II. 178. AT SEA. 35 a colony of Lindos ; and Rhodes must mean Lindos, for lalysos and Camiros had little to do with Egypt. It is said that the Rhodians levied custom dues at the island of Pharos off Alexandria till Cleopatra made the island part of Egypt by building the Heptastadion, the great mole joining it to the mainland'. The Heptastadion, however, was built before then, and the whole story is very doubtful. A little island in the eastern harbour of Alexandria with a palace and a port was called Antirrhodos, as if a rival of Rhodes^ On the coast of Asia Minor, Soloe in Cilicia was commonly called a colony of Rhodians from Lindos and of Argivesl But when the Rhodians asked the Roman Senate for its inde- pendence in 189 B.C. they merely said that its people were like themselves colonists from Argos*. The place afterwards decayed, and Pompey refounded it in ^'j B.C. as Poiipeiupolis^. Its ruins are near Mersina. Phaselis on the eastern coast of Lycia, now Tekrova, was a colony of Rhodians from Lindos. It was founded in 690 B.C. at the same time as Gela ; and the colonists were led by Lacios, the brother of Antiphemos, who led the Rhodians to Sicily. The Delphic Oracle, it is said, bade Lacios sail toward the sunrise ; and when Antiphemos laughed at this, the Oracle bade him sail toward the sunset and found a city of Laughter (Gela). The report that the migration to Phaselis was from Argos probably refers only to the worship of Apollo". A few miles south of Phaselis were Corydalla, a city of the Rhodians', and Gagse, a Rhodian colony*. The island of Megiste, now Castel Rosso, off the Lycian coast seems from the types of its coins to have been very closely connected with Rhodes : but this only after 408 B.C. when the great city was founded. It is not clear whether Corydalla and Megiste were true colonies of the Rhodians or merely places held by them. The southern ' Ammianus Marcellinas, XXII. i6. " Athenffios, pp. 297, -JgS ; Stepha- 2 Strabo, p. 794. nos, s. v. KXa; cf. Aristophanes, A- ' lb. p. 671; Pomponius Mela, I. charn. 606. I,. ' Stephanos, s. v. Kopi)5aXXa. <■ Polybios, xxn. 7; Livy, xxxvn. ' Etymologicum Magnum, 5. 1. Va.- 56. T"^'- 5 Strabo, p. 671. 3—2 36 RHODES. seaboard of Caria was called the Rhodian Peraea. It had a coast line of about 175 miles from Dsedala on the Lycian frontier at the Gulf Glaucos, now the Gulf of Makri, to Mount Phcenix on the tongue of land just opposite Rhodes\ This tongue of land was sometimes called the Rhodian Chersonese''. Rhodes bought the city of Caunos, which lay in the Peraea, from Ptolemy's generals', presumably just after its capture by the Egyptians in 309 B.C. ; and probably took the rest of the district about the same time. The city of Stratoniceia in Caria was acquired by the Rhodians shortly before their war with Antiochos* ; and after his defeat in 189 B.C. the rest of Caria south of the Maeander and the whole of Lycia except Telmessos was granted to them by the Roman Senatel They did not have undisturbed possession, but under the Roman Empire they still held Caria and some part of Lycia". In the south of Caria there were some Rhodian colonies'. Further north, Teos in Ionia is spoken of as a city of the Rhodians'; and ^antion in the Troad is said to have been founded by them'. In the .^gean the Rhodians justified their claim to the Thalassocratia by venturing before all others to an island that was upheaved between Therasia and Thera (Santorin) in 196 B.C. and founding a temple there". They also occupied Nisyros when the colonists from Cos who dwelt there had perished in a plague". Under Antony they held the more distant islands of Andres, Tenos and Naxos for a short time'". Under the Roman Empire they governed Chalce (Karki) and the other islands ofif the west coast of Rhodes; Casos and Carpathos (Scarpanto) further to the south; and Syme, Nisy- ros, Calymna, Leros and others to the north off the coast of Asia Minor". ' Strabo, pp. 651, 652. ' Pomponius Mela, I. 16. ^ Pliny, XXXI. 20; Seneca, Nat. * jEneas, Poliorc. 18. QuEES. in. 26. ^ Pliny, v. 33. ' Polybios, XXXI. 7. '» Strabo, p. 57. " lb. XXXI. 7; Livy, XXXIII. 18. " JDiodoros, V. 54. ^ Polybios, XXII. 27 ; Livy, XXXVIII. '^ Appian, de bel. civ. v. 7. 39- " Pliny, V. 36. ^ Dio Chrysostom, p. 620. AT SEA, 37 Lindos was the parent state of Gela, of Phaselis and of SoIce; and of these three alone among the Rhodian colonies is the parent state known. lalysos and Canniros, with poorer harbours and more fruitful territories, had less reason to seek fortune abroad. The Rhodians had to extend their territory in Asia Minor inland to obtain supplies for the great city when it had outgrown the resources of the island'; but the rest of their settlements were by the coast where their, mari- time genius could have free play. Bold voyages to distant parts of the Mediterranean in very early times and constant warfare with pirates are implied by this widespread coloniza- tion, but the naval power of Rhodes did not rise till the new city was founded (408 B.C.) and culminated two centuries later. In the Catalogue of the Ships Rhodes^ sends only nine out of 1 186 sent by all the Greeks, while Syme sends three, and Nisyros, Carpathos, Casos, Cos and Calymna send thirty be- tween them. Thus at the date of the Catalogue Rhodes could have been no stronger than the neighbouring islands; and these must all have been weaker than the Greek states in Europe. When the fleet of Xerxes was numbered at Doriscos on its way to Salamis in 480 B. C. there were present 307 trieres sent by the Greeks of Asia and the islands ; but of these the Dorians of Asia and the islands, including Rhodes, sent only thirty'. Thus Rhodes and her neighbours were still weak. It is said that Xerxes prepared the trieres and the Greeks merely manned them^ Rhodes may, however, have sent some of the three thousand smaller vessels of the fleet. When the Peloponnesian War broke out in 431 B.C. Rhodes was paying money to Athens instead of supplying ships^; but she may have supplied ships herself in the earlier years of the Confederacy of Delos. Two Rhodian pentecontors served with the Athenians on the Sicilian Expedition in 415 B.C., but these were small vessels". — The lists of the money pay- ments to Athens are so much broken that very few of the ' Livy, XLV. 25. ' Diodoros, XI. 3. 2 Homer, Iliad, n. 654. " Thucydides, II. 9. 3 Herodotos, vii. 93. " lb. vi. 43. 38 RHODES. sums paid by the Rhodians are quite certain. In 454 B.C.' the Lindians paid something over 840 drachms, while the CEiatse of the Lindians paid 55. The Lindians paid 1000 in 449 B.C.^ and the lalysians the same sum in 450 B.C." and 447 B.C.* The Lindians paid 600 in 445 B.C.^; and the same sum was paid by the Lindians and by the Camires in 443 B.C.", by the Lindians in 442 B.C.', and by the Lindians, by the lalysians, and by the Camires in 441 B.C.* The Pedieis from Lindos paid I drachma 4 obols in 445 B.C. and 441 B.C. The Lindians again paid 1000 in 436 B.C.'; and also in 428 B.C.", although the lalysians and the Camires paid only 600 that year. The Pedieis paid something over 80 in 428 B.C. In a list of uncertain date, but apparently later than 425 B. c", the Lindians paid as much as 1 500 while the lalysians paid only 500: the Pedieis paid 100 and the Diacrioe in Rhodes paid 200. The Erines, the Brycuntia:, and the Bricindarice are named in the lists, and' may be the Rhodians with similar ethnics. Thus the direct payments of the Lindians sometimes exceeded those of the lalysians and the Camires, apart from their indirect payments through the OEiatae of the Lindians and the Pedieis from Lindos. This may have been the ground of the dispute between Athens and Lindos about these pay- ments'^ The sums in these lists ranging from I drachma 4 obols (16 d.) from the Pedieis to 1500 drachmae {£60) from the Lindians can be only small fractions of the whole sums due. They are out of all proportion to the 32 talents (;^768o) levied by the Spartans on the island a few years later; nor could the Athenians have proposed to exchange these for a 5 per cent, duty on exports and imports '°. They may be a sixtieth payable to Athene. — In 412 B.C. the Spartan admirals wished to bring Rhodes over to their side, because of the multitude of its seamen". They requisitioned war ships there in 407 and 406 B.C.'", Lysander thus taking all the ships the 1 K. I. 226. e lb. 237. " lb. 262. 2 lb. 231. 7 lb. 238. '2 Harpocration, s. w. iireiireTi', &c. ' lb. 230. » lb. 239. 13 Thucydides, VII. 28, vm. 44. * lb. 233. » lb. 244. 14 lb. vni. 44. = lb. 235. » lb. 256. 15 Xenophon, Hell. I. 5, 6. AT SEA. 39 cities had*. This was after the great city was founded, but the separate fleets of the three cities are not mentioned again. In 390 B.C. the Rhodians had over sixteen trieres at seal In the Social War of 357 B.C. Rhodes, Cos, Chios and Byzantion had a fleet of a hundred ships: but it is not known how many were sent by each of the alliesl The Rhodians sent ten ships to Alexander at the siege of Tyre in 332 B.C.; or rather, the ship called Peripolos and with her nine trieresl They also sent ten ships with Ptolemy on his expedition to Athens in 312 B.C.'' During the great siege of 304 B.C. they once sent out a squadron of three cruisers, and afterwards three squad- rons of three cruisers each ; but they did not use the rest of their fleet". Among the gifts to Rhodes after the great earth- quake about 227 B.C. were ten penteres fully equipped from Seleucos, and timber for building six others from Ptolemy'. In the difficulty with Byzantion in 220 B.C. the Rhodians sent out ten ships, but four of these were supplied by their allies. Later on in the same year they sent three of the six ships with three smaller vessels to aid Cnossos*. The allied fleet of Rhodes, Pergamos and Byzantion at the battle of Chios in 201 B.C. numbered "jj ships, 65 of them being larger than trieres: but it is not known how many were sent by each of the allies". Next year three Rhodian tetreres joined the Roman fleet at the Peirseus, and there were twenty Rhodian ships with the Romans during the two following years ; and three years later (195 B.C.) eighteen Rhodian ships helped the Romans in putting down Nabis'". In 191 B.C., the first year of the naval war with Antiochos, the Rhodians sent out 25 ships. Next spring (190 B.C.) they sent out 36; but these were surprised' at Samos and only five escaped. Still they sent out 20 others in a few days; and in the autumn they engaged Hannibal off the Eurymedon with 36 ships — 32 1 Diodoros, xiii. 70. ' Polybios, V. 89. " Xenophon, Hell. IV. 8. ' lb. IV. 50, 52, 53. 3 Diodoros, xvi. ■21. ' lb. xvi. 1. * Arrian, Anabasis, II. 20. " Livy, xxxi. 22, 46, x.xxii. 16, " Diodoros, xix. 77. xxxiv. 26. * lb. XX. 84, 93. 40 RHODES. tetreres and 4 trieres — and seem to have had eight ships with the Romans at the same time. A little later they had 20 ships off Patara and 22 others with the Romans at the battle of Myonnesos\ Thus the Rhodians had over 70 war ships at sea in 190 B.C.: the greatest number they had at sea in any single year. In late times a rhetorician talks of their fleets of a hundred ships^ but there is no trace of them in history. Forty ships were fitted out in 171 B.C. for the war with Per- seus, but only five of them went on service": and only five trieres served with Attalos during the war with Crete in 154 B.C.* They did not use a large fleet against Mithridates in 88 B. C.^ Twenty of their ships served against him in the Black Sea in 74 b.C.° In the' Roman Civil War they fitted out 16 ships for Pompey in 49 B.C., and next year sent ten others with Csesar to Egypt'. They used 33 picked ships against Cassius in 43 B.C. After the great city was taken by him 30 of their war ships were carried off and the rest burnt except the Sacred Ship". At the naval games held by Clau- dius at the Lake Fucinus, some fifty miles inland from Rome, a contest was given between the fleets of Rhodes and of Sicily; each consisting of twelve, or of fifty, trieres*. As to the ships used, trieres, tetreres and penteres are of course ships with three, four and five banks of oars. The dicrotce seem to be dieres, ships with two banks. In late times there were in the dockyards ships with as many as seven and nine banks". It is not clear that trieres were used by Rhodes before about 400 B.C., when they had been three centuries in use, and tetreres and penteres were first being used. Nor is it clear that Rhodes had any ships larger than trieres till some penteres were given her about 227 B.C. The pentecontoroe were vessels of fifty oars, presumably in one bank. In the legend of Danaos and his fifty daughters, the ' Livy, XXXVI. 45, xxxvii. 9, II, tt, bel. Mith. 24. 16, -2 2, 23, -24, 26, 30. ° Memnon, Fr. 50. 2 Dio Chrysostom, p. 620. ' Caesar, de bel. civ. III. 5, 27, 106. * Polybios, X.XVII. 3, 6; Livy, XLii. ^ Appian, de bel. civ. IV. 66, V. 2. 45, 56. ^ Suetonius,CIaudius, 21 ;DioCassius, •■ Polybios, XXXIII. n. LX, 33. ' Diodoros, xx.xvil. 28; Appian, de '" Aiisteides, p. 341. AT SEA. 41 first ship that came from Egypt to Greece came by way of Lindos and was called the Pentecontoros*. Possibly the Lindians introduced this type of ship for long sea voyages. The celoces or celetes, swift vessels also with one bank of oars, were invented by the Rhodians''. The triemioliae were fast vessels without a deck; that is, without a fighting deck from end to end. The aphractcE seem to be of the same class. The Rhodian aphractce are said to have been bad sea boats'. The ship called Peripolos was perhaps the guardship at the great city, and the phylacides cruisers to defend the coast of the island. A Sacred Ship was maintained by most Greek naval powers. The Rhodian traders plying to Egypt must have been well armed, for in 305 B. C. they beat off the war ships of Antigonos*. In the Social War of 357 B.C., the first that the Rhodians waged on their own account, they managed to bribe the enemy's admirals not to attack them; and the action at the Hellespont ended in nothing^. In later wars they relied on their seamanship ; and they were generally successful, though very often opposed by fleets vastly stronger than their own in number and in size of ships. At the great siege of 304 B.C. Demetrios had 200 ships and 170 galleys besides transports, and had the pirates for aUies: yet he was at the mercy of the Rhodian cruisers. Three of these suddenly attacked his ships as they were ravaging the coast of the island, sank many of them, ran others ashore and burnt them, and then went safe home. After this three phylacides went to Carpathos, three triemioliae to Patara and three others round the islands: these sank and burnt his ships with impunity and captured his sup- plies on their way to the island and the plunder that was being carried off; and they also took many of the pirates and the Arch-pirate himself ^ The usual tactics of the Rhodians in action were to run through the enemy's line and break the oars of his ships as they passed ; and then turn and ram them 1 The Parian Marble, Epoch 9. ' Deinarchoi, pp. 92,110; Diodoros, = Pliny, VII. 57. XVI. 21. ' Cicero, ad Atticum, v. 12, 13. " Diodoros, XX. 82, 84, 93, 97. * Diodoros, XX. 82. 42 RHODES. in the stern or on the beam, always carrying away something needed for working the ships even if they did not sink them. At the battle of Chios in 201 B.C. the enemy's small craft hampered them in this by crowding round them and spoiling their skilful steering and fast rowing. When thus reduced to ramming stem to stem the Rhodians in some way depressed their prows, and so received the enemy's blow high up while striking him deep. One pentere, however, left her ram fixed in a vessel she thus sank, and herself filled and went down'. In the action off Lade a few weeks later the Rhodians suffered severely under the enemy's rams, and sailed out of action one by one to stop their leaks till few were left to fightl At the battle of the Eurymedon in 190 B.C. the enemy were discon- certed by the Rhodian tactics and the sinking of a Syrian ship of seven banks of oars by a single blow from the ram of a Rhodian of much smaller size^ At the battle of Myonnesos that same year the anchor of a Rhodian caught in a vessel she rammed ; and, as she tried to back off, the cable became entangled in her oars, and she was disabled and taken. At this battle the Rhodians carried braziers of fire hung over their prows ; and in trying to avoid these, the Syrian ships exposed their sides to the Rhodian rams^ These braziers had alone saved the ships that had escaped at Samos a few months before. The Syrians surprised the Rhodians by night, when lying in harbour there. The Rhodian admiral at once occupied the two cliffs that form the harbour's mouth, hoping to keep out the enemy by a cross fire from above. But here he was attacked by troops that had been landed on the other side of the island ; and supposing in the dark that these were part of a large force, he re-embarked his men and tried to fight his way out to sea. Five Rhodian ships and two from Cos carried braziers, and the enemy opened to let these pass; but all the rest were lost^ The Rhodians were much embar- rassed by the swift little vessels of the Cretan pirates in ' Polybios, XVI. 4, 5. Syria, 27. ' lb. XVI. 15. 5 Livy, xxxvil. 11 ; Appian, de reb. ^ Livy, xxxvii. 24. Syria, 24. * Livy, XXXVII. 30; Appian, de reb. AT SEA. 43 154 B.C.'. But they easily defeated the unwieldy ships of Mithridates in 88 B.C. off Myndos'. In the next action, how- ever, the king seemed likely to surround them with his huge fleet, and they thought it prudent to retire without fighting. But their usual tactics again succeeded in a smaller action arising from an attack by a Rhodian dicrotos on one of the king's transports and the arrival of supports on both sides. In the end the Rhodian admiral found himself with six ships opposed to twenty-five of the enemy, and before these he kept giving way ; but as they were turning to go back at dusk, he attacked them and sank two by ramming. And when the king's transports were in difficulties in a storm, a Rhodian squadron came down on them and inflicted great loss'' Off Heracleia in 74 B.C. twenty Rhodians began the attack on the Heracleots, thirty in number, and at the first shock three Rhodians and five Heracleots went down*. In the Adriatic in 48 B.C. a Rhodian squadron of sixteen ships under Copo- nius sighted some of Cffisar's ships crossing from Italy to Greece and went in pursuit. When the enemy had just made the harbour, the wind suddenly changed ; and the whole squadron went ashore and broke up. This is the only case of the loss of Rhodian war ships through bad weather; and also the only case in which a Rhodian squadron was commanded by a foreign admiral. In one of Csesar's actions off Alex- andria that same year four Rhodians, which had engaged the enemy to give time for the rest of his fleet to get into line, were attacked by some forty ships at once ; but they were so well handled that they gave their opponents no chance of ramming them or breaking their oars. In the action off the Canopic Mouth soon after this the admiral's ship was not supported by the rest, either through a blunder or from cowardice, and was surrounded and sunk^ The Rhodians once more used their old tactics with success in the action off Myndos in 43 B.C. till Cassius, having 80 ships to 33, closed ' Diodoros, XXXI. 38. " Memnon, Fr. 50. ^ Appian, de bel. civ. IV. yi ; Mem- " Caesar, de bel. civ. in. 26, 27; non, Fr. 31. Aiilus Hirtius, de bel. Alexand. 15, 25. ^ lb. de bel. Mith. 24—26. 44 RHODES. in on them and confined the fighting to ramming stem to stem, in which they were no match for the heavy Roman ships: and in the second action he followed the same plan'. During the sieges there was some fighting by the harbours. In 304 B.C. Demetrios built two towers and two shelters for throwing shot, and floated each of these four engines on two merchant ships. In rough weather, however, they proved unmanageable; and an engine that he afterwards built three- fold the former in height and width foundered in a squall before it came into action. Deck-houses with portholes were fitted on the strongest galleys for the long-ranged catapults and the Cretan archers. And to protect the engines from the Rhodian ships a long raft was built with an iron-plated bul- wark along it. On the first day of the attack the Rhodians drove the raft and engines out to sea by means of fire-ships. A week later three of their best ships with picked crews rammed the raft to bits, sank two of the engines and damaged " many of the enemy's ships. All this was done under a heavy fire, but only one of the three Rhodians was lost. The city walls were raised, as they were overtopped by the floating towers ; but they were soon breached by shot from the ships. The citizens held the breach against the enemy's troops, and burnt the boats they had landed in. The Little Harbour was defended by booms and by engines placed on merchant ships near its mouth. There were engines on the mole of the Great Harbour, and a wall across it about half way down. The end of this mole was surprised and held for a fortnight by four hundred of the enemy under shelter of barricades, the citizens recapturing it on a stormy day when the enemy's ships could not support its garrison. Fire balls were thrown from the enemy's fleet into the Rhodian ships with great effect^ The booms were again used for the defence in 88 B.C. Mithri- dates built a huge engine, the Sambuca. It was floated on two ships, and armed with battering rams: boats followed it carrying soldiers with scaling ladders to climb from it to the ' Appian, de bel. civ. iv. 71, 72. s Diodoros, xx. 85—88. AT SEA. 45 city walls. But it effected nothing, and at last collapsed'. In 43 B.C. the Roman ships were able to attack the walls for they had towers on board that took to pieces and were put up for the siege^ Thus the city walls were close to the water at some point in the days of Mithridates and Cassius: apparently not so in the days of Demetrios, for he could only batter with missiles and his storming party had to cross some ground to get to the breach. A change was perhaps made about 227 B.C. after the great earthquake. Later on there was space for merchant vessels touching at the great city to be drawn up on shore and for their crews to pitch tents near them^ This was perhaps inside the harbours : there would be no walls there, for command of the harbours gave command of the city. Thus when the Rhodians went over to deliver Halicar- nassos from Artemisia in 351 B.C. the ships on returning dressed with laurel as if for their victory were admitted to the harbours without suspicion; and the city was taken. The queen had seized the empty ships when their crews had landed to occupy her city and had sailed back to Rhodes in them with her own troops on board''. For this reason again the citizens would not allow Demetrios to bring his fleet into harbour in 304 B.C.^ On the other hand, they had driven the Spartan fleet out of harbour in their revolt of 395 B.C.; but this perhaps by surprised The dockyard was maintained at great cost long after the Thalassocratia had passed from the Rhodians'. Intruders into some parts of it were punished with death as at Carthage and elsewhere*. When Heracleides set fire to it in 204 B.C. thirteen of the sheds were burnt, each with a triere in it". The sheds were thus like those at the Peiraeus : those at Syra- cuse and some other places held two trieres each. Besides building for themselves, the Rhodians built ships for Antigo- nos; but he supplied his own timber'". Long afterwards 1 Appian, debel. Mith. 54, 27. ' lb. xiv. 79. 2 lb. de bel. civ. IV. 72. ' Aristeides, p. 341. = Lucian, Amoies, 8.' * Strabo, p. 653. < Vitruvius, 11. 41. " Polysnos, v. 17. = Diodoros, XX. 82. " Diodoros, XIX. 58. 46 RHODES. Herod of Judsea had a large triere built at Rhodes'. Im- mense quantities of ship timber were presented to Rhodes after the great earthquake about 227 B.C., and fifty years later Perseus presented morel The presents for the dockyard after the earthquake also comprised iron, lead, pitch, tar, resin, hemp, hair and sailclothl Once in time of need the Rhodian ladies cut off their hair and gave it for making ropes, just as the ladies of Carthage and Massalia had given theirs*. These ropes were long afterwards shewn to strangers who came to Rhodes I The Rhodian commissioners appointed to send stores to Sinope when besieged by Mithridates in 220 B.C. spent the vote of 140,000 drachmae (^^5,600) in sending 1 50 cwt. of hair, 50 cwt. of sinew, 4 catapults with men to work them, 1000 suits of armour, 3000 pieces of gold and 10,000 jars of wine". Subscriptions for the navy are partly in wine and partly in money in a Rhodian list perhaps belonging to 190 B.C. when a fresh fleet was sent out after the disaster to Pausistratos'. In the list 99 drachmae 4 obols are given for rations for six months, and 265. 3 for some other time. If i obol be for some fee and 99. 3 be for rations for six months, 265. 2 would be for rations for 16 months. After the earth- quake Ptolemy sent 20,000 artabes of corn as rations for ten trieres'. Taking each crew at 200 men, the daily ration at one choenix, and the Egyptian artabe at 15 choenices, this corn would last five months. These figures point to commis- sions for six months and for five months. In the list 151 drachms are also given for rations for a year, and 302 for two years. By the treaty with Hierapytna in Crete each Rhodian triere serving there was to be paid 10,000 drachms per month". In the list the man who proposed the subscription gave 7000 drachmae (^^280) while the rest gave from 5000 drachmae (;^20o) down to 50 drachmae {£2). Aliens and stran- gers gave as well as citizens. Many of the subscriptions are for ^ Josephus, de bel. Jud. i. 14. ^ Polybios, IV. 56. ' Polybios, XXVI. 7. ' N. 343. ' lb. V. 88—90. 8 Polybios, v. 89. <■ Frontinus, I. 7. " M. 1852, p. 79. ^ Aristeides, p. 355. AT SEA. 47 self and son; for self and daughter; for self, children and wife ; for self and father: and one child gives for self and grand- papa. A Rhodian squadron went out every year, the trieres going as far as the Atlantic. The custom remained under the Roman Empire; but then only one or two aphractos went out, and sailed no further than Corinth^ In decrees 'service on ship during war' is distinguished from 'service on ship' simply: this last being perhaps on these yearly voyages^ There is no trace at Rhodes of the Athenian trierarchy, the duty of fitting out a ship for the public service, though many voluntary payments for the navy were expected'. The demo- cracy had to supply pay for the seamen, and was once over- thrown for refusing to hand it over to the trierarchs*. Thus a Rhodian is called trierarchos of an aphractos, being apparent- ly its captain °, and the trierarchos, the master of the trieres, seems an officer lilie the nauarchos, the master of the ships". The nauarchos was at the head of naval affairs and was of high political rank, having power to make alliances for the state'. Other offices were pilot of trieres and master of aphractoe^ Rhodian squadrons were commonly of three ships, or of multiples of three ships; and there may have been an officer to command every three, for nothing in their tactics accounts for these numbers. A Rhodian fleet commonly had one commander. At the Eurymedon the fleet had three ; but it had been formed from three separate fleets". It was a proverb that ten Rhodians were worth ten ships'", r;/iej5 Siica 'FoSioi SiKa vyjef. and their fine seamanship was acknowledged as much by Romans as by Greeks. There is a story" of a Rhodian captain muttering while expecting to lose his ship in a storm, "Well, Poseidon, you must own I'm send- ing her down in good trim." And they were fine swimmers. 1 Dio Chrysostom, p. 621. '' Polybios, xxx. 5. <> F. i; N. 353; R.H. 23; B. ^525. » F. i. ' Strabo, p. 653. ' Livy, XXXVII. 22, 23. * Aristotle, Tolitics, V. 3, 5. ^ Diogenianos, Parcemioe. * B. 2524. " Aristeides, p. 346. ^ Diodoros, XX. 88. 48 RHODES. At the battle of Chios in 201 B.C. they lost only sixty men though four of their ships were sunk, while the Macedonians lost 9000 men besides prisoners': and when they went out to burn the siege engines of Demetrios in 304 B.C. they simply swam home if their own vessels took fire^ It is notable that Rhodian youths of the noblest families eagerly served under Pausistratos at sea, though he commanded only foreign mer- cenaries ashore'. He perhaps doubted how long the zeal of these sailors would last, for when they assembled in gorgeous armour he took them on board and ordered them to stow their armour there, and then put sentries to see that it re- mained as security for their return*. Just before the siege by Cassius in 43 B.C. the somewhat degenerate Rhodians cruised off the mainland to shew his troops the fetters they had col- lected for them'. The ships' ornaments captured from Deme- trios in 304 B.C. were dedicated'; and in late times trophies of ships' rams and other spoil stood in many parts of the city, some of it taken from the Etruscan pirates'. The Rhodians had put down piracy on their early voyages to the western Mediterranean*, and these trophies may date from that age. Piracy in the Levant they never put down thoroughly. The pirates there were well organised under an arch-pirate, and made alliances with Demetrios and with Antiochos against Rhodes". With regard to Cretan piracy, Hierapytna agreed with Rhodes to attack the pirates by land and hand over them and their ships to the Rhodians'". Caesar was captured by pirates on his way to Rhodes. His friends were six weeks in getting together his ransom of 50 talents (;^i 2,000), but directly he was free he got some Rhodian ships and took the pirates. The Romans always sent pirates to the cross; but Caesar in return for some courtesy these had shewn him, had their throats cut before they were nailed up". When Pompey ^ Polybios, XVI. 7. ^ Aristeides, p. 342. 2 Diodoros, XX. 86. ' Strabo, p. 654. 2 Livy, XXXIII. 18, XXXVII. 12. " Diodoros, XX. 82; Livy, xxxvn. * PoIyKnos, V. 27. 11. » Dio Cassius, XLVII. 33. '» M. 1852, p. 79. " Diodoros, XX. 87. " Suetonius, Cresar, 4. 74. AT SEA. 49 with the aid of the Rhodians crushed the pirates a few years later {^"j B.C.) he could not crucify twenty thousand prisoners; and he settled most of them in the old Rhodian colony of Solce'. Piracy was again familiar in late times, for the plot of a novel written about 200 A. D. turns on the capture of the hero and heroine by a Phoenician pirate triere that had been lying in harbour at Rhodes as a merchant ship and had fol- lowed theirs out to sea^ Trade was sometimes attracted by dubious means. After the battle of Chsroneia in 338 B.C. an Athenian called Leo- chares fled to Rhodes, saying that Athens was taken, the Peireeus besieged, and he was the sole survivor. Thinking the power of Athens was really broken, the Rhodians sent out men of war to bring in passing merchant ships; apparent- ly to enforce some right of preemption ^ So in a case at Athens, in which a ship chartered to carry corn there from Egypt had discharged at Rhodes on the way, Demosthenes congratulates himself in his speech for the charterers that he is not before a Rhodian court, for in that case the owners might be favoured for bringing corn to the island. The owners, it appears, had desired Rhodes as an alternative port to Athens in the charter-party; presumably by the direction of Cleomenes, satrap of Egypt, in whose service they were*. This satrap, who had a monopoly of the export of corn from Egypt, must therefore have favoured the trade with Rhodes. A little later most of the supplies of the great city were drawn from Egypt'. Merchant ships touched at the great city on their way from Egypt to Greece; and even before its founda- tion they came round the north end of the island, probably touching previously at Lindos like the Pentecontoros in the legend*. Corn was also imported from Sicily : but after Rome made that her granary, this was only by leave of the Senate and in limited quantities. Thus in 169 B.C. leave was 1 Strabo, p. 67 r. 1296, i«97- 2 Xenophon of Ephesos, de amoribus ^ Diodoros, XX. 81. Anthiset Abrocomaa, I. 13. e xhucydides, VIII. 35; Diodoros, ' Lycurgos, p. 150. xiv. 79. * Demosthenes, pp. 12S4, 1285, T. R. 4 50 RHODES. given to import 20,000 quarters'. Wine was largely exported from Rhodes both to Egypt and to Sicily, the handles of the jars being found throughout Sicily and at Naucratis and Alexandria. Many of these are stamped like the coins with the head of Helios or the wild rose. They bear the name of some priest of Helios — the dignitary that gave his name to the year at Rhodes — in all cases; and in many cases the name of some month as well. An emblem probably belonging to some magistrate is often added. The stamp would certify the capacity of the jar: it can hardly refer to the vintage, for the names of all the Doric months occur. These handles are found at many other places on the Mediterranean and the Black Sea. Wine and oil were the staple exports from Greece to the Black Sea, while the imports were cattle and slaves, and also honey, wax and pickles. It was to maintain the freedom of this trade that Rhodes, as the chief naval power amo}^ the commercial states, went to war with Byzantion in 220 B.C.'''. Rhodian myrrh- oil seems to have been exported to Athens'. There was a commercial treaty between Rhodes and Rome as early as 306 B.C.: and among the products of the island exported thither under the Empire were chalk, white-lead, glue, verdigris, sponges, purple, and the saffron unguent^ After the great earthquake about 227 B.C. the Rhodians were exempted from all custom dues in Syria and in Sicily^ The continuance of this exemption in Syria was secured for them by the Romans under the treaty with Antio- chos in 188 B.C.; as were also their real property and rights of action in his dominions^ They had long before been encouraged to settle there, for when Antigonos went to war with Rhodes in 304 B.C. he directed that the Rhodian mer- chants in Syria, Phoenicia, Cilicia, and Pamphylia should be unmolested'. The Rhodians occupied a central position for the commerce of the ancient world, and their recognized 1 Polybios, xxviii. i. p. 688; Vitruvius, vii. 63, 65. = lb. IV. 38. 5 Polybios, v. 88, 89. ' Arislophanes, Lysist. 944. * lb. xxii. 26; Livy, XXXVIII. 38. ■• Pliny, xiii. -i, XXIV. 1, XXVIII. 71, ' Polyrenos, iv. 6. XXXI. 47, XXXIV. 26, 54; Alhenffios, AT SEA. 51 policy of neutrality brought many foreign merchants to settle in the island'. Thus the report of the taking of Athens brought to Rhodes by Leochares was spread over the whole earth by the merchants residing there'^ And young men were sent there to learn business'. It is said that when the Romans offered a general remission of debts after the Civil War, the Rhodians alone refused it^: and at Rhodes a son remained liable for the full payment of his father's debts long after he could escape liability at Rome by renouncing the inheritance^ Rhodes had close commercial relations with Cnidos, lasos, Ephesos and Samos soon after 400 B.C., as appears from the issue by these states of coins of a uniform standard and with the same type on the obverse. This standard seems to be the Persian: but the Rhodians, on founding the great city, had issued coins of a new standard, commonly called the Rhodian, of about 60 grains to the drachma. This was soon adopted by Cos, Cnidos, Halicarnassos, Samos, Chios, Cyzicos and other states as far north as ALnos and Byzantion; which thus appear to have been under the commercial influence of Rhodes, In a century and a half this standard fell to about 50 grains to the drachma, and probably became the unit of the cisto- phorce, coins that circulated throughout the Levant. A Rhodian talent of 4,500 cistophorce is mentioned, but the passage is probably corrupt^. Early in the Ilnd century B.C. Rhodes and several other states of the ^gean were striking coins with the types of Alexander the Great and of the Attic standard: a measure necessary for their trade with European Greece now that the Rhodian standard had fallen. These are sometimes a trifle heavier than the corresponding Athenian coins: and in a certain payment made at Tenos shortly before 167 B.C. 100 Rhodian drachmae seem to have been reckoned equal to 105 Athenian'. The Rhodian standard fell still further, for at Cibyra in 71 a.d. a Rhodian drachma was 1 Diodoros, XX. 82, 84. "■ Sextus, Hypotyposes, i. 149. ' Lycurgos, p. 149. * Festus, s. v. Talenta. ' Plautus, Mercator, prologue, 11. '^ B. ■2334. ■■ Dio Chrysostom, p. 602. 52 RHODES. worth only ten sixteenths of a denarius when that coin weighed about $2 grains'. The maritime law of Rhodes was adopted by Rome. The response of Antoninus Pius is preserved": — "I rule the land, but the law rules the sea. Let the matter be judged by the naval law of the Rhodians, in so far as any of our own laws do not conflict with that. This same judgment did Augustus give." This last sentence is perhaps doubtful. The com- ments of Salvinus Julianus, who flourished under Antoninus Pius, are the earliest now extant on the only principle of Roman naval law that is certainly Rhodian. This is the principle of general average': — "that if cargo be jettisoned to lighten the ship, all contribute to make good the loss in- curred for the benefit of all." This principle still obtains among all maritime nations; and probably much else of the naval law of to-day has come down from the Rhodians. Nothing is heard of these laws at Rhodes itself. The Jus Navale Rhodioriim is a forgery of the Middle Ages. ' B. ad. 4380, a. '^ The Pandects, xiv. II. 9. ' lb. xiv. II. i. IV. ON SHORE. The City of Rhodes was built in the closing years of the Peloponnesian War. It is strange that its site was not occupied before. The corn ships passing round the north end of the island on their way from Egypt to Greece must often have anchored where its harbours afterwards were while waiting for the prevailing N.W. winds to fall. The site, how- ever, demanded a large city, for the only hill that could serve as a citadel was more than a mile from the harbours ; and perhaps the islanders could not previously have peopled it. Hippodamos of Miletos was the architect : the man to whom Pericles had entrusted the rebuilding of the Peiraeus'. It is notable that a Deigma — a bazaar of the Oriental type — was found in few Greek cities but the Peirseus and Rhodes. Covering the level ground near the harbours and then rising gradually along the terraces of the Acropolis hill to the vast circle of walls with their lofty towers, the city was compared to the body of a Greek theatre^ Thus the people could watch the fleet of Demetrios as it crossed the strait, the men stand- ing on the walls and the women and the old men on the roofs of their houses^ But in storms all the rain water rushed down to one place, and in the first century of the city there were three serious floods. The first of these was soon after the city was founded, while there was still much vacant 1 Strabo, p. 65+. ' Diodoros, XIX. 45, xx. 83. '' lb. XX. 83, 54 RHODES. ground ; and was the least destructive. More damage was done by the second : and more still by the third, when five hundred lives were lost. This was in 315 B.C. The lower part of the city was inundated till the walls gave way under the pressure and let the water fall into the sea. There were channels under the walls to prevent these floods ; but the people had not kept them clear, as they fancied the winter rains were over\ A few years later (304 B.C.) Demetrios destroyed all the trees and buildings near the city for material for his camp. The walls by the sea were raised during the siege, and a second line of defence, probably temporary, was built within the walls on the landward side; stones from the outer wall of the theatre and from some of the temples being used for this. When the siege was over, a grove within the city was enclosed with porticos and dedicated to Ptolemy ; and the theatre, the walls and the temples were rebuilt with greater splendour than before^. A marble theatre was after- wards promised by Eumenes, but was not built ^ The city was ruined by a great earthquake about 227 B.C., when the Colossos and the greater part of the dockyards and the walls were overthrown ^ It was soon rebuilt by aid of immense gifts from foreign powers ; but it was again shaken by the earthquake of 196 B.C.' Some Rhodian monuments to the victims of earthquakes still exist; and also inscriptions record- ing repairs to older monuments that had been thrown down". The extension of the south end of the Acropolis was earlier than the siege by Mithridates in 88 B.C.; but apparently much later than the rebuilding of the walls after the great earth- quake, for the wall there is of very inferior work. The suburbs were levelled by the citizens before this siege'. It was the city of this age that called forth Strabo's opinion that " in harbours, in streets, in walls, and in other buildings it so sur- passes all other cities that we cannot call any its equal, much less its supsrior®." Two centuries after him, the rhetorician 1 Diodoros, XIX. 45. " Justin, xxx. 4. 2 lb. XX. 83, 85, 87, 93, 100. " B. C. H. u. 617, V. 33i;L.U. 9. ' lb. x.xxi. 36. ' Appian, de bel. Mitli. 24, 26. * Polybios, V. 88 — 90. * Strabo, p. 652. ON SHORE. 55 Aristeides talks of the sacred groves in the Acropolis ; the symmetric building of the rest of the city, so that it seemed a single house rather than a town ; the long, broad streets ; and the absence of vacant ground between the walls and the build- ings — a thing rare in Greek towns'. This city perished in the earthquake of 157 A.D. The sea went back, and returned in a wave ; the buildings fell in a shapeless mass of ruin ; and then fires broke out that burnt on day and nightl The Emperor Antoninus Pius rebuilt the city'; and in a few years Aristeides could again call it the fairest of Greek cities*. It was probably after this rebuilding that Pausanias reckoned the city walls among the finest he had seen^ Six thousand citizens and a thousand aliens bore arms at the great siege of 304 B.C. The aliens that refused to bear arms had been expelled : they were chiefly merchants who had been attracted to the island by its steadfast neutrality in that age of warfare, and not more than one man in six of this class would care to fight. Thus in times of peace the aliens may well have been as numerous as the citizens. In a census taken at Athens a few years earlier 21,000 citizens, 10,000 aliens, and 400,000 slaves were returned. Allowing for women and children, this implies a free population of about 150,000; and assuming that the 400,000 slaves include women and children, the free are to the slaves as three to eight. If this proportion held at Rhodes, 6000 citizens and 6000 aliens would imply 60,000 free persons, and so 160,000 slaves ; or 220,000 for the whole population. This was before the city's great prosperity : but most of the islanders must have come into the city for protection during the invasion. The slaves were armed for the siege. Many, no doubt, had gone away with their alien masters, and many would not be trusted : still, if half the able bodied slaves were armed, they added some 16,000 to the 7000 free men for the garrison. The reinforcements were 150 men from Crete and 500 from Egypt: and later on, 1500 more from Egypt. The whole 1 Aristeides, pp. 342, 343. * Arisleides, p. 396. 2 lb. pp. 345, 349, 351, 353. •' Pausanias, IV. 31. ^ Pausanias, vill. 43. S6 RHODES. garrison would thus be about 25,000 men. The attacking force was 40,000 men, besides the cavalry, the engineers and the sailors*. For the attack Demetrios built the Colossos of siege engines, the Great Helepolis. This was a moveable tower ; the base square and the sides sloping inward. Its size is variously given : Plutarch puts it at 99 feet high by 72 broad: Diodoros at 150 feet by 75: Vitruvius at 125 by 60, and gives its weight as 125 tons. It moved on wheels, going very steadily though with much creaking and straining ; and was propelled by a body of soldiers underneath. There were portholes for discharging shot at each story of the tower, and huge tridents were carried for breaking away obstacles. On either side of the Helepolis were four shelters to cover the miners and two others with huge battering rams like ships' prows. These shelters also moved on wheels, and were con- nected by a covered way for the men working them. At the first attack a very massive tower built of squared stone was thrown down and the wall on either side so damaged that the citizens could not get to the battlements. These siege engines were built only of wood and so were covered with basket v/ork and raw hides to resist fire balls and the heavy stone shot. The citizens once knocked off some of this covering with their shot and set fire to the woodwork ; but there were water tanks in the upper parts of the engines, and the fire was put out. The Helepolis itself was designed to resist stone shot of 2J cwt., but no stone shot heavier than J cwt. seem to have been used at the siege. In a night attack many were killed because they could not see the stone shot and the pointed shot coming and get out of their way, so the velocity was low. Pointed shot nearly two feet long were used. In this night attack over 1500 pointed shot and 800 fire balls were discharged by the citizens. It is said that a little before the siege a certain Callias of Arados came to Rhodes with a design for a huge crane to stand on the city walls ; it would grapple a common helepolis as it came up and lift it over the walls into the city. The Rhodians forthwith made him state ' Diodoros, XX. 82, 84, 88, 98. ON SHORE. 57 architect in place of Diognetos, who then held that office. But the Great Helepolis was too much for the crane. Diog- netos would do nothing, till at last he was moved by the prayers of ingenuous maidens and youths escorted by priests. He then diverted the sewage of the city toward the Hele- polis, which soon clave to the swamp and could not be moved. After the siege he brought it within the city and dedicated it to the people. It was designed by Epimachos of Athens'. Besides the second line of defence erected within the walls during the siege, half-moons were built to cover weak points and a great trench was dug round the first breach made by the Helepolis. Fifteen hundred picked men, however, got through this breach by night, killed the guards at the trench, and occupied a portion of the city near the theatre. But next day they were attacked by the best of the Rhodian troops and the fifteen hundred mercenaries from Egypt, and very few of them escaped. The mines were met by countermines: these the enemy tried to seize by bribing the officer of the guard, a certain Athenagoras, but with very poor success. The citizens rewarded him with a golden chaplet and five talents (;^I200) for betraying this attempt. He was not a Rhodian, but of Miletos and in command of the mercenaries from Egypt: and they hoped by this to attach the other mer- cenaries. They attached the slaves by a decree that all who fought well should be purchased by the state and enrolled as citizens: and the decree was carried out. The citizens them- selves were encouraged by a decree that those who fell should be buried at the public cost, their parents and children main- tained out of the treasury, their daughters dowered on mar- riage and their sons on reaching manhood crowned in full armour in the Theatre at the Festival of Dionysos. The rich had readily given their money for the defence, and the work- men their work; some at arms and ammunition, but most at strengthening the walls. Ransoms were arranged with Deme- trios at looo drachmae (^40) for a free man and half that sum ' Diodoros, XX. 91, 95 — 97; Plutarch, Demetrios, 21; Vitruvius, X. 46 — 48; Ammianus Marcellinus, XXIII. 4. 58 RHODES. for a slave'. It is said that at the siege of 88 B.C. Mithridates exchanged all his Rhodian prisoners for Leonicos, who had saved his life, thinking it better to endanger his success than prove ungrateful ^ In that siege there was little fighting by- land, and in the sjege by Cassius none at all. Mithridates intended to surprise the south end of the Acropolis by night and thence give the signal by a fire for his troops to attempt the city walls with scaling ladders while his ships attacked the harbours. But the citizens discovered his plans and lighted the fire themselves; and his troops finding the walls manned did not deliver the attack °. Among the mercenaries sent in from Egypt during the siege of 304 B C. were Rhodians who had taken service with Ptolemy'. Telephos of lalysos who has carved his name on the leg of one of the colossi at Abu Simbel seems to have come there among the Greek troops in the service of Psametik II. nearly three centuries earlier. A coin with the lion's head of Lindos and the silphion tree of Cyrene on the obverse and the eagle's head of lalysos on the reverse was probably struck as pay for Rhodian mercenaries in the army of Arcesilaos III. on his restoration at Cyrene in 530 B.C. Seven hundred Rhodians served on the Sicilian Expedition of 415 B.C. as slingers^ Early in the retreat of the Ten Thousand in 401 B.C. Xenophon found there were Rhodians among them and formed a body of two hundred slingers. Their leaden bolts carried twice as far as the stones from the Persian slings and further than most arrows ; and in the next action Tissaphernes soon retired out of range, for not a Rhodian missed his man. They had obtained the cords and lead from the villages they passed'. Some sling bolts lately found in the island are about an inch in length and shaped like filberts, bearing in low relief an arrow head on one side and on the other their owner's name, Bagyptas. In later times the Rhodians kept mainly to the sea. The force with which Pausistratos recovered the Peraea ' Diodoros, XX. 84, 93, 94, 97, 98, " Diodoros, XX. 88. 100. '■ Thucydides, vi. 43. ^ Valerius Maximus, v. 7, Ext. 2. ^ Xenophon, Anabasis, ill. 3, 4. ^ Appian, de bel. Mith. 26. ON SHORE. 59 in 197 B.C. comprised Achseans, Gauls, Pisuetas, Nisuetas, Tamiani, Arei from Africa and Laodiceni from Asia, but no Rhodians: yet when this same Pausistratos commanded the fleet the best men among the Rhodians eagerly served under him'. By the treaty with Hierapytna two Rhodian trieres could be demanded for service off Crete and two hun- dred heavy armed Cretan soldiers for service in Rhodes. Transport for these was to be provided by the Rhodians and pay from the date of arrival at the rate of nine obols (15^'.) a day a man and two drachmas (201^.) a day for officers com- manding not less than fifty men. Hierapytna was to aid Rhodes in levying mercenaries in Crete, and Rhodes was to do the like for Hierapytna in Asia Minor" The forts in the Rhodian possessions in Asia Minor were garrisoned with foreign mercenaries'. The Rhodian sailors were capable of service on shore. In Cento's descent on Chalcis in 200 B.C. they forced Philip's strongest jail, and liberated his political prisoners. In the war with Nabis five years later they helped to construct the works for the siege of Gytheion and took part in the assault on Sparta*. At Ruspina in 46 B.C. Caesar employed them as light armed troops to act with his cavalry^. It is character- istic that when the Ten Thousand were stopped in their retreat by the river Tigris a Rhodian came forward with a plan for crossing it on a pontoon of inflated skins". Polyxenidas, the Rhodian exile who commanded the fleet of Antiochos the Great against his own countrymen, had thirty years earlier commanded Cretan mercenaries in Hyrcania'. In 190 B.C. he treated with Pausistratos the Rhodian admiral for his recall from exile in return for the surrender of the king's fleet, ap- parently compromising himself irrevocably by letters written with his own hand and sealed with his seal, and then surprised Pausistratos in his false security*. Memnon the Rhodian, ' Livy, XXXIII. 18, XXXVII. 12. ° Xenophon, Anabasis, ill. 5. 2 M. 1852, p. 79. ' Polybios, X. ig. 8 Dio Chrysostom, p. 611. ' Livy, xxxvil. 10, 11; Appian, de ' Livy, XXXI. 23, xxxiv. 29, 38. reb. Syria, 24. * Aulus Hirtius, de bel. Afric. 10. 60 RHODES. who commanded the Persian fleet against Alexander the Great, had previously commanded against him on land at the battle of the Granicos and at the siege of Halicarnassos, and had alone urged the true policy of Persia when the war began — defensive operations in Asia and an attack on Macedon by sea\ He was satrap of the west of Asia Minor, as was his brother Mentor before him. Mentor had held a joint com- mand in Egypt with Bagoas, the chief eunuch of the Persian l N. 357; R. A. 21, 24; F. 68. " Demosthenes, p. 194. ^ Cicero, de jepub. HI. 35. T. R. 5 66 RHODES. to upset the democracy established in the other'. As late as Domitian's time the clumsy government of the democracy caused serious disturbancesl Later still, the Rhodians were still meeting daily for deliberation, though other Greeks seldom met^ Even under the Antonines they had energy enough for political disturbances, and it was a saying that they would refuse immortality itself unless assured of eternal democracy*. The revenue was large. About 170 B.C. the harbour dues reached a million drachmae (;^40,000) a year. Most of Lycia and Caria was at this time tributary ; the cities of Stratoniceia and Caunos alone paying 120 talents (;£"28,8oo), though Caunos had been purchased rather more than a century before for only 200 talents (;£'48,ooo). Rome replied to the conceit of the Rhodians during the war with Perseus by making Delos a free port; and by 164 B.C. their harbour dues had fallen to 150,000 drachmae (£6,oooy. But Lycia and Caria remained subject, with some intervals, as late as the Roman Empire ; and in those days there were many other tributary states^ Besides the immense gifts from abroad, large sums used to be presented to the state by private citizens for public purposes and especially for maintaining the poor. An ancient custom, moreover, required the rich to see that the poorer citizens did not want'. Fees must have been paid to the state on admission to citizenship, for after the great earth- quake about 227 B.C. Hiero and Gelon sent ten talents (i!'2.40o) to increase the number of citizens^ Many of the slaves were made citizens after the siege of 304 B.C., and in one case of much later date a slave was emancipated by the City and made Guest of the Senate and Commons'. He was of foreign birth. The slaves, or emancipated slaves, whose dedications have been found in numbers near the great city, were mostly natives of Asia Minor. There were slaves belong- ^ M. 1852, p. 79. * Dio Chrysostom, p. 670. ^ Plutarch, prjEcept. ger. reip. 19. ^ Strabo, pp. 652, 653, " Dio Chrysostom, p. 567. ' Polybios, V. 88. * Aristeides, pp. 384, 385. " R. I. 278. ' Polybios, XXXI. 7. ON SHORE. 67 ing to the City, and probably a board of masters to manage them : they seem once to have rebelled \ Adoption was very popular. Nearly half the Rhodians named in inscriptions are described as 'son of so-and-so, but by adoption son of so-and- so.' Pliny in one instance has evidently mistaken the Rhodian phrase Ka0' vodecriav by adoption for Kad' inr66e(Tiv by hypo- thesis ; and has founded a curious story on his blunderl Public life brought many dangers. Cassius and Arte- misia killed the leading men on capturing the great city. Hostages were taken by Demetrios after his siege and by the Persians just before Marathon, while the leaders of the Persian party were exiled by their fellow-countrymen. After the war with Perseus the citizens tried to exonerate them- selves by executing the leaders of the anti-Roman party. There was civil war in the island soon after the great city was founded. A little earlier the leading aristocrats had been driven into exile by Athens. Dorieus, the most famous of these, retired to Thurii and there fitted out ships to serve against Athens during the Peloponnesian War. His men were devoted to him : and when Astyochos once raised his staff against him, the act nearly cost the Spartan admiral his life at the hands of the indignant soldiers and sailors^ He was taken in 407 B.C. and brought to Athens. The people had already decreed his death : but on seeing a man so famous for his Olympic victories in chains before them, they set him free without even a ransom. Twelve years later he was in Peloponnese when news came that Rhodes had again gone over to Athens : and he was put to death at Sparta in blind vengeance for the revolt. When his ancestor Dama- getos, the despot of lalysos, enquired of Apollo at Delphi whence he should choose for himself a wife, the god bade him wed a daughter of the best man among the Greeks, and Aristomenes did not refuse him his daughter's hand. The hero of the Messenian Wars came with his daughter to the island and there ended his days'". ^ N. 346. ■* Xenophon, Hell. i. 5 ; Pausanias, ' Pliny, XXXVI. 4. IV. 24, vi. 7. ^ Thucydides, vin. 84. 68 RHODES. lalysos and Camiros were in ruins before the earthquake of 157 A,D., though lalysian decrees occur down to the time of the Emperor Titus'. The chief remains at Camiros are of structures for the supply of water. At the top of the Acropolis a gallery about two feet wide and six high runs under the surface for about 230 yards in a straight line, having on one side three branches of about 27 yards each, one at the centre and one at each end. From these main galleries many others diverge, generally one or two yards in length and none longer than ten yards ; and these all end in shafts opening to the surface. It is clear they were for water supply and not for drainage, as the bases of the shafts are always lower than the galleries leading to them. The city was supplied by a conduit hewn straight through the eastern limb of the Acropolis hill to a cistern on the east side ; and this was itself fed by another conduit running southward under the hill to a spring. These conduits are about four feet high and two wide. Pliny mentions a Rhodian marble with golden veins'', but the ruins throughout the island are of stone. The gymnasion in the great city was a magnificent building, full of famous pictures and statuesl No less than 75 talents (;£'i8,ooo) were sent by Hiero and Gelon to supply oil for it after the great earthquake about 227 B.C." Under the Roman Empire the gymnasiarch of the young men in the great city gave his name to the year, but presumably only for purposes of the gymnasion °: and a great athlete and officer of the gymnasion at Philadelphia was made citizen and senator of Rhodes'. The Rhodian builders invented a type of courtyard that was afterwards adopted in many of the wealthier houses at Rome : it had a colonnade on all the four sides, and that facing the south was carried on higher columns'. "They build for eternity, but they eat as though they were to die to-morrow" was an ancient saying against the Rhodiansl They judged a man by what he ate. A ' Aristeides, p. 354; R. H. 23. ' R. A. 26. ' Pliny, XXXVII. 62. ^ B. 3426. 5 Strabo, p. 652. ^ Vitruvius, vr. 50. * Polybios, V. 83. * Plutarch, rle ciipid, divit. j. ON SHORE. 69 connoisseur in fish was at once pronounced a gentleman : and a man who was content with meat, a mere shopkeeper'. Lynceus of Samnos in an epistle** written about 250 B.C., in which he compares the delicacies of Rhodes and of Athens, calls the island admirable in its fish and praises the aphye (.' anchovy), the ellops (.' sword-fish), the orphos {? sea-perch) and a kind of shark called the alopex, the fox. A popular saying advised a gourmet who could not afford a Rhodian alopex to steal one even if he died for it. Varro and Pliny, however, thought the ellops the greatest delicacy of the island'. Then in the matter of milk cakes, Lynceus thought highly of the Rhodian echinos at the second course of a dinner. For dessert he approved the Rhodian escharites, a sweet cake that made drinkers sober and restored to gour- mands their appetites. Martial, however, suggests that a Roman gentleman need not break his slave's jaw with a blow: he might give him a Rhodian cake*. The peach tree, when introduced from Egypt, proved sterile and tantalized the people by merely flowering^. But the wild figs were admired by Lynceus, and also the custom of eating them before dinner instead of after. The figs had a fine flavour and were known in Rome°. The dried figs called brigindarides were a local growth in the island, for the ethnic of one of the demes is Brygindarios'. Lynceus also commends a grape called hipponios that ripened in July. The Rhodian grape was a well-known species, and must have been largely grown throughout the island'. A bituminous earth found there about 100 B.C. proved very useful in killing the insects off the vines'. The Rhodian wine was in repute at Athens and at Rome", and was widely exported. Some of it was sweetened with boiled must, but most of it was pure : and a delicate ' ^lian, var. hist. I. 28. " Athenseos, p. 80; Pliny, XV. 19. ' AthenEeos, pp. 75, 109, 285, 295, ' Athenaeos, p. 652. 360, 647, 654. * Pliny, XIV. 4; Macrobius, Sat. II. " Varro, de re rust. 11. 6; Pliny, IX. 16. 79. ' Strabo, p. 316. ^ Martial, XIV. 68. " Vergil, georg. 11. 102; Aulas Gel- " Theophrastos, hist, plant, iii. 5 ; lius, xiii. 5. Pliny, XV. 13, xvi. 47. 70 RHODES. flavour was imparted by just the right quantity of sea water'. Cato economized by flavouring his home-made wine in this way, and flattered himself that it passed for Rhodian or the kindred Coanl The Rhodians frequently drank theirs mulled with myrrh, cinnamon, mint, etc., with divers beneficial results'. There was much drinking and gambling with dice among the Rhodian aristocrats in early times, often for very curious stakes*; and cock-fighting was common. Their fighting cocks rivalled those of Tanagra, and became favourites at Rome^ A sumptuary law could not be enforced even against shaving^ And in many ways the austerity of these Dorians was tempered with Oriental luxury'. The Rhodian youths disturbed Diogenes by appearing at the Olympic Games in more costly attire than any of the Greeks': and in later times the Roman satirists did not spare them". On the other hand there is a story of a grave Rhodian rebuking a Roman lictor for fussiness". Wealthy Romans frequented the island. Its sunny climate attracted them". Caesar, Brutus, Cassius and Cicero, all stayed there to study rhetoric. Pompey halted there in 6"] and 62 B. c. on his way between Rome and his commands in the East''. Herod of Judaea came there to meet Octavian after Actium". Nero, who had as a boy pleaded the cause of the Rhodians before Claudius, afterwards talked of abdicating the Empire for a life of leisure at Rhodes". Titus visited'' the island in 68 A.D. before he became Emperor. Tiberius lived there for seven years. He had been struck with the climate and the beauty of the island when touching there on ' Athenaeos, pp. 31, 32. » Juvenal, vi. igS, viii. 113; Te- ' Pliny, XIV. 10, 12; Cato, de re rence, eunuch. III. i, 29; Plautus, epid. rust. 112. II. 2, 115. ^ Athenaeos, p. 464. '" Plutarch, de cohib. ira. 10. * lb. p. 444. " Horace, Odes, I. 7, i ; Martial, iv. " Pliny, X. 24; Martial, III. 58, 17; 55, 6, X. 68, i; Pliny, II. 62. Columella, viii. 2, 11. '^ Strabo, p. 492; Pliny, vii. 31. ^ Athenaeos, p. 565. ^* Josephus, de ant. Jud. XV. 6. ^ Anacreon, xxsii. 16; Athenaeos, pp. ^"* Suetonius, Nero, 7, 34. 129, 352. " Tacitus, hist. II. 2. ^ /EHan, var. hist. IX. 34. ON SHORE. 71 his return from Armenia, and so chose it for his retreat. He was tribune ; but he lived as a private gentleman with a moderate house in the great city and a villa outside, and would stroll about the gymnasion without lictor or attendant, mixing with the Greeks on almost equal terms. One day when he was going to visit the sick, some blundering official caused them all to be brought down to one place and arranged in groups according to their complaints for his convenience: and there was not one of them, however humble, to whom he did not apologize. When the term of his office as tribune expired in 2 B.C., Augustus forbade his return to Italy; and he stayed on at Rhodes. He was now in daily fear of assas- sination. He gave up exercise with horse and arms, ex- changing the Roman toga and sandals for the Greek cloak and slippers — probably the peculiar Rhodian shoes' — and retired to the country to avoid the visits of the Roman officials touching at the great city. There he devoted himself to the study of astrology, keeping a stalwart slave in attendance to throw untrustworthy astrologers down the cliff to the sea as they left his house. At last an eagle, a bird then rarely seen in the island ^ perched on the gable; and in a few days news came of his recall. When Emperor he once wrote a friendly letter to a Rhodian acquaintance inviting him to Rome. He was absorbed in his enquiries into the murder of Drusus and was torturing everyone for evidence when the guest arrived, and he absently ordered him to be tortured. On finding out the blunder, he had the man killed that he might not go about talking of it'. He had been virtually an exile during the last years of his stay in the island; and many Romans must have lived there in like case, for Rhodes was excepted in the decree of II A.D. that exiles interdicted from fire and water should live in no island within forty miles of the continent ^ Amid the general corruption of the Greeks in the Hnd century A.D. the Rhodians retained much of the old Doric severity and quiet good sense. They kept gladiators out of 1 Pollux, vn. 22. Tacitus, annales, I. 4, vi. 20, jr. 2 Pliny, X. 41. * Dio Cassius, LVI. 27. ' Suetonius, Tiberius, 11 — 14, 62; 72 RHODES. the island, just as they kept the public executioner out of the city and held trials for murder outside the walls. The rest of the Greek world could not rival them in wealth or culture. The every-day duties of life were performed with perfect finish, and even the rustics seemed less clumsy than usual in the gymnasion there. At the Theatre they listened in silence and did not applaud till the end. They dined quietly like men who knew how to order a dinner, and cared more for conversation than for drinking. Their dress was simple and strangely moderate in the use of purple. They did not bustle about the streets ; and if strangers failed to fall in with their pace and walked about without looking where they were going, they called them to order\ It is significant that a word that elsewhere meant a jester, at Rhodes meant a liar^ ^ Dio Chrysostom, pp. 620, 632, 650, ^ Hesychios, s.. v. TryXatatrrT/s. 651,679; Aristeides, pp. 353, 360, 373. V. THE GODS. Helios was the great god of Rhodes. The whole island was sacred to him, as Cythera was sacred to Aphrodite or Delos to Apollo. The people revered him, the grandsire of the heroes Lindos, lalysos and Camiros, as ancestor of their race'. His priest gave the name to the year. The Colossos was in his likeness, and the coins of the great city bore his image. The worship, however, was not so marked in early times : Athene of Lindos had then the greatest honours. But when the great city was founded, some worship must have been needed in which lalysos and Camiros should have as large a share as Lindos : and it was probably then that Helios took the first place. His temple in the great city is often mentioned; but there is no record of any temple to him in the ancient cities. The festival of Helios was yearly, in September ^ A team of four horses was then sacrificed to him by casting them into the sea'. Horses were sacrificed to him in many places ; but not in teams of four, nor were they cast into the sea. The team was in this case referred to the chariot of the sun : and within the temple was a statue of the god standing in the chariot with its four horses\ But every ninth year in Illyricum a team of four horses was devoted to Poseidon ' Diodoros, V. 56. ' Festus, s. v. October. = Scholia to Pindar, Ol. VII. 80. * Pliny, xxxiv. 19. 74 RHODES. Hippios and cast into the sea^: and at Lindos Poseidon was worshipped as Hippios I Thus the custom may have arisen from some blending of the worships. The ancient sacrifice to HeHos of white or tawny lambs was also offered in the island'. In the games at the festival there were races for horses and for chariots, gymnastic contests for men and for boys, and contests in music*. The prize was a wreath of white poplar^ The contests were severe ; for victors there were victorious also at the Pythia, the Isthmia and the Nemea ; and great athletes from abroad, like Marcus Aurelius Ascle- piades, thought it worth their while to compete". In the great days of Rhodes the neighbouring independent states and the kings of Pergamos sent envoys to the festival': and it was still flourishing centuries afterwards*. Athene Lindia was greatly reverenced throughout the island and abroad. Though Diagoras was of lalysos, it was in her temple at Lindos that Pindar's ode in his praise was dedicated'. From over the sea Egyptians, Phoenicians and Greeks sent offerings to her. Even after her eclipse by Helios, the Roman Marcellus on taking Syracuse in 212 B.C. sent gifts to her temple". She was worshipped " with flame- less sacrifices." Fire, it would seem, was made ready and the victim was slain on an altar of burnt offering in a grove on the Acropolis, but the fire was not set to the altar". The sacrifice , was daily, and the victims were eaten within the temple". A rock-cut inscription on the Acropolis records the planting of a grove of olive trees there in honour of Athene". The ruins shew that the temple consisted of a cella, measuring externally some sixty feet by twenty-five, with two columns in antis in both pronaos and posticum, and probably a portico of four columns at each end. The order cannot be traced, but ' Festus, s.v. Hippius. ^' Athenseos, p. 561; Xenophon of ■■' R. A. 7, 12. Ephesos, v. 11. = R. H. 45. » Gorgon, Fr. 3. * R. H. 2i; F. 10, 12, 13; B. 3208, 1" Plutarch, Marcellus, 30. 5913; L. U. 2; L. B. 201. " Pindar, 01.VIi.48;Diodoros,v.56. ' Scholia to Pindar, 01. vii. 80. ^' Suidas, s. v. 'Podliov xp^^t^^' ' F. 12, 13; B. 5913. " L. U. 55; Anthologia Palatina, ' Appian, de reb. Macedon. 9. xv. 1 1 . THE GODS. 75 was presumably Doric. About the middle of the Acropolis are the ruins of another small temple, which was certainly Doric and of the best period of Greek art. This perhaps belonged to Zeus Polieus, guardian of the city, who was com- monly worshipped with Athene Lindia'. Athene Polias and Zeus Polieus were worshipped together both at Camiros" and in the great city': where Athene lalysia Polias and Zeus Polieus Camires were also worshipped*. Zeus was also worshipped in Rhodes as Paean, the healer^; as Endendros, protector of trees'; as Eridimios, guardian of the people''; at Netteia as Patroios, guardian of the family"; at Camiros as Teleios, fulfiller of prayer'; and on Mount Atabyros as Atabyrios^ Athene was worshipped with Zeus Atabyrios at Acragas, and therefore probably with him on Mount Atabyros ^ In the ruins of his temple on the top of the mountain the walls of a cella measuring some forty-five feet by thirty-five can be traced, and also the walls of a peri- bolos about forty yards square ; but no columns have been found. On the Acropolis of the great city was another temple of Zeus Atabyrios'". In the temple on the mountain were certain bronze kine that bellowed when any evil was to happen". The bronze bull of Phalaris at Acragas bellowed when a man was put inside and a fire lighted beneath. And it is to be feared that when the bronze kine were heard bellowing on Atabyros the priests were offering baked sacrifices to avert the coming evil. Then a man was always sacrificed to Cronos in August. This custom endured after the founding of the great city; but in later times the victim was a criminal already con- demned to death. He was led outside the city gates and then, near the temple of Artemis Aristobule, wine was given him to drink and he was slain'^ Human sacrifices to Cronos were common among the Phoenicians, and Zeus Atabyrios 1 R. A. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, lo, 14, 15, 16, <> J. H. S. 11. 354. 19, 28 ; F. 63, 65, 66, 71. ' N. 353 ; F. 59. ' B. C. H. V. 337. 8 Diodoros, V. 59; Strabo, p. 655. s F. 17. ' Polybios, IX. 27. 4 lb. 71. '" Appian, de bel. Mith. 26. 5 Hesychios, s. vv. naidf, "EvSei'- " Scholia to Pindar, Ol vii. S7. Spas, 'EpidliMio!. " Porphyry, de abstineiitia, II. 54. 76 RHODES. seems closely related to the Canaanite Molech of Mount Tabor. These rites would therefore have been brought to Rhodes by the Phcenician settlers, either directly from their homes or by way of Crete. The custom that no herald should enter the shrine of Ocridion' may point to human sacrifices like those of the Athamidse at Alos. If the eldest of the lineage of Athamas entered the prytaneion there, the people straightway decked him with garlands and offered him to Zeusl Small bronze figures of bulls (Plate IV.) which proba- bly served as offerings to Zeus Atabyrios are sometimes found upon Mount Atabyros. Zeus and Hera were worshipped together in the deme Pontoreia as Orolytoe, whatever that may be'; and Hera was worshipped in the great city as Basileia, the queen'. Dionysos was much honoured in the great city. His altar was probably the chief place in the Agora*. His temple was the richest in offerings, and was crowded with works by the greatest painters and sculptors'. There also the tripods given as prizes at his festival were dedicated'. At his festival at Lindos there were contests, processions and sacrifices : and both citizens and foreigners, whether holding land or merely resident, could be called on to supply a choros'. Lambs were sacrificed to him in the island'. The Pagladia, a Rhodian festival when the vines were trimmed, must have been sacred to him'. He was also worshipped in Rhodes as Thyonidas, child of Semele : a phallic rite'. In the great city there was also a worship of Dionysos Bacchos ; to which belonged the festival of Bacchos, celebrated with greater pomp every third year as the Trieteris". The Roman Trieteris, which was also kept in the island, did not fall at the same time ". Hermes was worshipped in Rhodes as Epipolaeos, protector of traders '^ and as Chthonios, guide of the dead". 1 Plutarch, qiisest. grsec. 27. ' J. H. S. IV. p. 352. ^ Herodotos, VII. 197. ^ Hesychios, s. vv. na7Xii5ta, Qvu 3 F. 71. Mas. " N. 343. i» B. 2525, b. ' Strabo, p. 652 ; Lucian, amor. 8. " R. I. 277. ® Aristeides, p. 399. ^^ Gorgon, Fr. 2. ' R. H. 47. " Scholia to Aristophanes, pax, 6jo. THE GODS. -j-j Apollo was worshipped at Lindos as Pythios', as Olios', averter of death, and as Loemios^ averter of pestilence; at Camiros as Epimelios^ guardian of flocks, as Aeigenetes^ perpetual giver of increase, as Mylas', guardian of mills, as Carneios*, god of corn, and again as Pythios*; at Ixia, as Ixios"; again as Pythios in the great city"; as Erethimios, Erythibios, or Erysibios, averter of mildew, near the modern village of Tholo, where the temple and a marble omphalos forming part of the statue have been found'; and as Smin- theus, destroyer of mice, both at Lindos and in the great city, for there were sacred enclosures for the festivals at both places' : and these festivals differed from the Sminthia else- where, for Philodemos or Philomnestos wrote a book con- cerning the Sminthia in Rhodes^ Artemis was worshipped together with Apollo Erethi- mios"; also at Lindos" and near the modern hamlet of Arta- miti on Mount Atabyros'^ as in Cecoea or simply as Cecoea, whatever that may be; as Aristobule", admirable in counsel, near the great city; in the island, as Euporia", goddess of plenty; and at Lindos as Pergsea'", apparently of Perge in Pamphylia. And it was a custom in Rhodes to crown the statues of Artemis and of Persephone with asphodel'", pro- bably as deities of the nether world. The worship of Poseidon at lalysos was in the hands of a priesthood of Phoenician origin", but nothing further is known of it. On occupying the volcanic island upheaved between Thera and Therasia in 196 B.C. the Rhodians built there a temple to him as Asphaleios, bringer of safety". He was worshipped at Lindos" and in the great city"" as Hippios, 1 R. I. 272; R. A. 7; F. 65. " R. A. 4, 6, 8, 15; R. I. 272; F. ' Macrobius, Sat. I. 17. 65, 66, 71. 3 J. H. S. IV. 351. '- B. C. H. IX. 100. * B. C. H. V. 337. '^ Porphyry, de ahstinentia, II. 54. ^ Stephanos, s. v. 'l^^ac, ^^ Hesychios, s. v. EyTrop^a. " F. 71. '" F. 67. ' Strabo, p. 613; R. I. 276, 277; ^' Suidas, s. v. 'Acri^iSeXos. R. H. 43, 44. " Diodoros, V. 58. 8 Strabo, p. 605. '* Strabo, p. 57. ' Athenaeos, pp. 74, 445. '" R. A. 7, 12. » R. H. 43. 2" F. -I. 78 RHODES. creator of the horse; also as Gilseos', apparently of Gela in Sicily, in the great city; as Cyreteios^ apparently of Curfis in Italy, at Camiros; and near the modern village of Yannathi as Phytalmios, giver of life, with sacrifices of mature pigs'. Hestia was worshipped with Zeus Teleios at Camiros^ References to the worship of Apollo Telchinios at Lindos, of Hera Telchinia at lalysos and at Camiros, and of the Nymphs Telchiniae at lalysos shew only that the statues of the deities in certain temples were held to be the handiwork of the Telchines\ At Lindos there was a strange worship of Heracles. While the sacrifice was offered, the priest heaped curses and abuse upon the hero; not, however, at random, but in a fixed sequence handed down from early times*. There was no- thing like this elsewhere in Greece; and it may have arisen from some outburst of the Egyptian settlers at Lindos against the sacrifice of animals that they held sacred. "Lindians at their sacrifice" or "Rhodians at their sacrifice" became a pro- verb for bad language in sacred places'. The sacrifice was probably of one ox of the plough. Lactantius, however, says that two oxen of the plough were sacrificed yoked together on an altar called Buzygon. If this was so, the rites of Heracles Buthcenes, the beefeater, had been blended with those of the harvest festival Buzygia at which a yoke of oxen was thus sacrificed. The temple of Asclepios was an important place in the great city*. The guild of the Asclepiadae, however, was ex- tinct at Rhodes in the Ilnd century A.D., though the guilds at Cos and at Cnidos were still flourishing'. The worship pro- bably came from Epidauros in very early times, but the legends about this have perished". The ancient tree worship perhaps survived at Lindos in 1 F. 71. tius, I. 21. 2 g_ Q^ fj. V. 337. ' Hesychios, s. vv. AlvSloi ttJc Ou- 3 ji3_ II, 5ig. fflav, 'PdStot T7}V Qvaiav. * F. 59. ' N. 343. ' Diodoros, V. 55. ' Galen, de meth. med. i. « Conor), Nar. 11 ; ApoUodoros, 11. " Aristeides, p. 396. 5; Philostratos, imag. II. 74; Lactan- THE GODS. 79 that of Helen Dentritis': and all running streams were reve- renced in the island, as in many parts of Greece, by the wor- ship of the river Acheloos^ Among the characters in Rhodian history or legend Halia', the bride of Poseidon, was worshipped as an immortal under the name Leucothea and therefore as a sea goddess: while Alectrona', Phorbas'', Althaemenes of Crete', Aristomenes of Messene*, Ocridion^ and Tlepolemos" had the honours of heroes. It is not clear in what part of the island the temple of Tlepolemos stood. Every year there was a solemn assem- bly there with a procession, a burnt sacrifice of sheep, and contests wherein the prize was a wreath of white poplar. There is extant a curious decree for keeping holy the temple and precinct of Alectrona near lalysos. "There shall enter in to the precinct no horse, donkey, mule, jennet, or any other beast of burden, nor shall any man drive any of these into it; nor shall any man bring in shoes or anything made of pigskin: whosoever breaketh this law shall purify the temple and pre- cinct and offer sacrifice or else be liable for impiety: but if any man drive in sheep, he shall pay one obol (twopence) for each sheep'." To Phorbas the Rhodians sacrificed for good luck before setting out on a long voyage". Mylas, one of the Telchines, was held to be the founder of the sacred rites Mylanteia, presumably some festival of the millers, at Cami- ros'; and a promontory near there was sacred to him". In like manner another promontory was sacred to Pan"; and a third to a certain Thoas, of whom nothing is known 'I There was also in Rhodes a worship of the Macrobioe, the elderly nymphs". Egyptian gods of course found followers in Rhodes. Sarapis was worshipped in the great city" and at Lindos". 1 Pausanias, in. ig. ° Hesychios, s. v. MuXas. ^ Scholia to Homer, II. xxiv. 6i6. '" Stephanos, =. v. M-vXavTla. ^ Diodoros, v. 55, 56, 58, 59. " Ptolemy, geographia, v. *. " Pausanias, IV. 24. ^2 Strabo, p. 655. ' Plutarch, qusest. grsec. 27. i' Hesychios, s. v. ' Scholia to Pindar, Ol. vii. 77. " F. 71. ' N. 349. " R. A. 12. ^ Polyzelos, Fr. i. 80 RHODES. The temple of Isis in the great city stood near the walls by the sea, and during the siege by Mithridates a spectre of the goddess was seen to hurl down a mass of fire upon his floating siege engines'. Thus the Rhodians gained something from the wisdom of the Egyptians : the phantom goddess that came to the Greeks at Salamis gave only good advice. After the siege by Demetrios the Rhodians by leave of the oracle of Zeus Ammon began to worship their ally Ptolemy Soter. They dedicated to him a square grove within the great city, and built on each side of it a portico a furlong in length; and this they called the Ptolemaeon^ Long afterwards it re- mained their custom to chant a paean in his honour'. The goddess Pistis, good faith, seems of Roman origin*. Although religious zeal was then dying out in Rhodes, the walls and towers of the Acropolis of Lindos were thoroughly restored as late as the time of Hadrian^ The panegyreis, the solemn assemblies, of the Lindians were yearly. An inscription found at the temple of Apollo Erethimios mentions "the panegyris after the war" and also a festival called Dipanamia". A festival called Episcaphia was celebrated in the island, presumably when the seed was sown, and at Lindos there was a sacrifice called Telesthia'. The festival of the Doric Pentapolis at the Triopian Cape brought over the islanders with their wives and children, and led to much friendliness between the people of the three Rhodian cities and those of Cos and Cnidos. They met at the temple of Apollo and sacrificed together; and then there were races for horses and gymnastic and musical contests. The prizes were bronze tripods, but the winners were expected to dedicate these in the temple. Once a man from Halicar- nassos, Agasicles by name, carried off the tripod he had won to his own house and fixed it there with nails. The dispute arising from this ended in the expulsion of Halicarnassos from the league ". 1 Appian, de bel. Mitli. 27. ' R. A. ix; R. I. 277. ° Diodoros, XX. 100. ' Hesychios, s. vv. 'ETrur/cd^ia, Te- ^ Athenasos, p. 696. Xeadla. ' A. Z. 1878, p. 163. ' Dionysios of Halicarnassos, IV. 25;. ° B. C. H. IX. p. 109. Herodotos, i. 144. THE GODS. 8 1 At the Olympic games Leonidas of Rhodes was the greatest of all runners. He was four times victor in the race itself, and was twelve times crowned as victor in the heats. No family could rival the Diagoridae of Rhodes. Diagoras himself won the boxing for men in 464 B.C. Of his sons, Acusilaos also won the boxing for men, Damagetos won the pancration, and after him Dorieus the youngest won the pan- cration in 432, 428 and 424 B.C. Of his grandsons by his daughter Callipateira, Eucles won the boxing for men and Peisirrhodos that for boys. Rhodes did not reap all the glory of these victories, for Dorieus and Peisirrhodos were in exile when they won and entered as men of Thurii. Diagoras was at Olympia with Acusilaos and Damagetos when they won, and the young men carried him on their shoulders through the assembly while all the people cast flowers on him calling him blessed in his sons. Callipateira was the only woman that ever ventured to the Olympic games. After her husband's death she accompanied her son Peisirrhodos thither disguised as his trainer. She was discovered, and there was a law that any woman found there should be cast from a certain rock; but they considered of what family she was and sent her away unharmed. The statues of the Diagorid^ formed a notable group in the Altis at Olympia. Near them was a statue bought with a fine paid by the Rhodians to Olympian Zeus because a wrestler from Rhodes had cheated, and another bought with a bribe offered by a Rhodian in 68 B.C. to the wrestler Eudelos\ Replicas of the statues of the victors would have been set up in their native island. At Lindos there is the base of a statue of Agesistratos who won the wrestling for boys at Olympia : the men of Lindos set it up^ Diagoras claimed descent from Heracles in the male line through Damagetos the despot of lalysos who was moreover of the royal line of Argos, and in the female line through Aristomenes the Messenian hero who had thrice offered the sacrifice of him v/ho had slain a hundred foemen: and he was himself a huge man and 6ft. 5in. in height'. He was also victor four times at the Isthmia, twice ' Pausanias, V. 6, ^i, VI. 7, 13; cf. " R. A. 25. Aulus Gellius, III. 15. ' Scholia to Pindar, 01. vii. 15. T. R. 6 82 RHODES. at the Nemea and often elsewhere'. His son Dorieus besides his three victories at the Olympia, gained eight at the Isthmia and seven at the Nemea; while at the Pythia no one would face him I Another Rhodian was afterwards victor at the Isthmia, the Nemea, the Pythia and several other festivals'. The Rhodians were generous to the gods abroad. At Delphi the Lindians set up a statue to Apollo*. In a list of plate in the temple of that god at Miletos are entries: — vase, plain, on pedestal ; offering of Peisicrates the Rhodian : another, on pedestal six feet high ; offering of Sophanes chief envoy and the other envoys from Rhodes^ At Odessa a Rhodian was honoured for giving money to pay for the sacri- fices°. Near Beyrut in Syria a drinking fountain was set up by a man "from afar, from island Rhodes; a desired piece of handiwork, a bronze image of horned Ammon, pouring out for mortals holy running water'." When certain Greeks set up a statue of the god Tanos near Memphis in Egypt, where they were probably serving with Agesilaos and Chabrias about 360 B.C., a Rhodian was among those who dedicated the table of libation^ Other Rhodians, however, shewed little respect for the deified Pharaohs by scrawling up their own names on the tombs of the kings at Bab el Moluk near Thebes ; one of these names was written in 75 B.C." The gods at Rhodes were in their turn largely endowed from abroad. For ex- ample, after the great earthquake about 227 B.C. Hiero and Gelon of Sicily sent ten talents (^^2,400) for sacrifices, and Pto- lemy of Egypt sent stores of corn for sacrifices and games'". Sometimes the Rhodians imposed the worship of their own deities on foreign countries. When Naxos was subjected to Rhodes about 40 B.C. the worship of Rhodos was introduced there, and her priest took precedence of all others". And the priests of Hierapytna were bound by the treaty with Rhodes to pray to Helios, to Rhodos, and to the rest of the gods and 1 Pindar, Ol. VII. 80—87. ' B. 4535. 2 Pausanias, vi. 7. « B. 4702. ' F. 14. " B. ad. 4778, b, 4789, b, ad. 4789, a=, * Pausanias, X. 18. ad. 4807, d. <• B. 2860. " Polybios, V. 88, 89. •' B. ad. io6o, c. " B. ad. 2416, b. THE GODS. 83 goddesses and founders and heroes of the city and country of Rhodes*. The priests were not a caste; except perhaps in the wor- ship of Poseidon at lalysos. At Lindos they were to be chosen from the Lindians alone, and probably there was the like rule in the other cities ^ In late times when some families had died out and others had grown too poor to hold the office, this rule must often have brought several priesthoods to one man or the same priesthood to several members of one family. Thus at Lindos a man was priest of five deities', and in the great city a man and his two sons successively held the priest- hood of Helios*. Most priesthoods were held for a year, but in one case at Lindos a man held the office for thirteen months', and in late times it may have been held for life". The priesthood of Helios was at one time obtained by lot'. Perhaps a retired priest had some status in a temple, for the public secretary in the great city, who had been priest of Zeus Atabyrios, dedicated to that god on behalf of the masters of the public slaves ^ At Camiros there was an Archiaristas, or Exieristes, a chief purifier; and presumably other purifiers'. At Lindos", and in the great city", there were Hierothytse: fiifteen of them at Lindos with an Archierothytes. They had a hall there, the Hierothyteion, and maintenance in it was granted by the Lindians just as maintenance in the Pryta- neion was granted by other cities '^ There was also a hall of feasting, the Histiatorion, in the temple of Alectrona near lalysos". In most places the Hierothytae were attendants who slew the victims, but in Rhodes they apparently formed a board appointed by the state to manage public worship. There were twelve Hieropoece at Camiros and six at the temple of Apollo Erethimios : and the office existed at Lindos". 1 M. 1852, p. 79. 9 N. 353; B. C. H. V. p. 337. ' N. 357. 10 N. 35j; F. 6,. R. A. 9, 16, 17; ^ R- A. 7. R. I. ^^l ; B. C. H. IX. p. 112. * F. 16. 11 F. I. = B. C. H. IX. p. 108. 12 R. A. I, 21, 21. * F. 71. 13 N. 349. ' B. C. H. IX. p. 96. " N. 351, 353, 357; R. I. 276; « N. 346. B. C. H. V. 337. 6—2 84 RHODES. The Hieropoeoe generally were magistrates who saw that the victims were without blemish: and at Camiros they were to see that no intruders beheld the sacrifice. In one instance a Rhodian was sent as Hieropceos to Lemnos and to the Didymaeon near Miletos, presumably to attend sacrifices offered there by his city. At Lindos there was a Hierota- mieus, and at Camiros and at the temple of Apollo Erethimios a Tamieus, treasurer of the temple'. A man could be Hiero- tamieus more than once. Dionysios the historian was priest of Helios and a retired priest became public secretary^: but the men who held these other offices were of another type; they became admirals, ambassadors or Prytaneis". At Lindos these officers were, like the priests themselves, to be chosen from the Lindians alone. In the great city and at Lindos and Camiros there was the office of Agonothetes, judge in the festal contests*; and in the great- city the office of Pro- phetes, interpreter of oracles^ At the temple of Apollo Erethimios there were Hierophylaces, guardians of the temple. They probably managed its property, for they had a secretary and an undersecretary^. The territories of the three ancient cities were, for religious purposes, divided into districts called Ctoenae'. Those of Camiros extended to the mainland of Asia Minor and to the island of Chalce, the islanders having some sort of home rule. The inhabitants of each district who had the right to share in the sacrifices to Athene at the city in whose territory the district lay were called Ctoenatae. This right passed by de- scent: and perhaps also by adoption. Apparently it was sometimes claimed by intruders who were seeking the position of Ctoenatae, for it was ordered at Lindos that no one should in future share in the sacrifices who had not before, and at Camiros that the Ctcena should be registered and the Ctoenatae admitted to the sacrifices only in the presence of the Hieropceoe. For such registration the Ctcenats in I N. 351; R. A. 17; R. H. 23; R. ^ R.I. 279;B.C.H. V. 337, IX. 106. I. 276. » B. C. H. IX. p. 96. ^ N. 346; Suidas, s. v. Aioj/foios « R. I. 276. Movataviov. ' N. 351, 357; B. C. H. IV. 138, ' N. 353; R. H. 13; F. I. IX. 1 14. THE GODS. 8S each Ctoena elected an officer, the Mastros, the election being held in the most holy temple in the Ctcena. These Mastrce superintended religious matters in general. Thus at lalysos they passed a decree for keeping holy a certain temple: and at Lindos they conducted the election of choregce, they set up statues to men for their piety, and they passed a decree in honour of men who had carried on lawsuits against intruders to the sacrifices'. There was a secretary of the Mastrce both at Lindos and at Camiros^ The form of the decrees is "by the Mastrce and the Lindians," or as the case maybe: so the Mastrce probably acted as a senate in initiating the decrees to be laid before the people'. Some of these decrees are made "with the consent of the Epistatae," who were pro- bably the chief officers in religious matters. There was, how- ever, in the great city an "Epistates of the boys*". Certain Epistatae sent out by the Commons of Lindos apparently to some of the neighbouring islands are mentioned, but these were natives of the islands to which they were sent'. At the temple of Apollo Erethimios there were three Epistatae and also an Episcopos". At Lindos there were again three Epis- tats, and thirty men were elected to aid them in carrying on the lawsuits against intruders'. These numbers point to election by the three Doric tribes and their thirty clans. Other tribes" existed in the island, apparently named from the legendary leaders of the peoples that had migrated thither; for example, from Althaemenes. These were divided into clans, Phratriae, and these again into families, Patrae. It is notable that some family names are found more than once in the same clan and also in more clans than one. These tribes apparently survived as religious societies based on the sacred rites of the family. The guilds, Erance, were open to all, women as well as men', and the highest offices in them could be held by foreigners and persons born in slavery'". ' N. 349, 351, 357; R. A. 26; R. H. « R. I. ^^6. 47;R. I. 271. 'N. 357. 2 N. 353 ; R. A. 15 ; R. H. 47. 8 n. 345, 352 ; F. 6. ' Hesychios, s. v. luuTrpoi.. " F. 20; B. C. H. IX. 121 ; L. U. 61. * F. 1. w B. 2625, b; B. C. H. v. p. 331. » R. A. 9. 86 RHODES. These guilds were the Heliastae and Heliads, the Diosataby- riastas, the Diosxeniastee, the Athenaistae, the Panathenaista, the Athenaistae Lindiastae, the Poseidoniastae, the guild of Apollo Strategics, the Dionysiastae, the Hermaistae, the Pani- astae, the Asclepiasts, the Serapiasts, the Heroeistae, the Soteriastai, the Euthalids, the Agathodaemonaistae, the Thia- sitae, the Pyrganida, the Nacoreioe, the Lemniastae, the Samo- thraciastae and the Lapethiastas". These guilds broke up into groups probably named from their founders: the Diosataby- riasts of Euphranor; the Dionysiastae of Chaeremon ; the Soteriastae of Lysistratos ; the Agathodaemonaista; of Philon ; the Samothraciastffi of Meson. Then these groups, the guilds themselves, or unions of guilds broke up into temporary branches: the Diosatabyriastae of Euphranor, those with Athenffios of Cnidos ; the Athenaistae Lindiastae, those with Gaius; the union of the Samothraciastae and the Lemniastae, those who went to sea with so-and-so. These unions were of two or three members, and the members might be entire guilds or groups or branches. They were probably temporary or for limited purposes, for the same guild often figures in different unions. When named together entire guilds take precedence of groups or branches. The guilds Lemniastae, Samothraciastae, and Lapethiastae may have been for people from Lemnos, from Samothrace, and from Lapethos in Cypres, respectively: the Union of the Islanders that set up a statue to a certain Rhodian at Delos seems such a society^ At the great city there was a union of the young men'. The officers of a guild were the Epistates, the president; the Grammateus, the secretary ; the Hierotamieus, the treasurer; the Hieroceryx, the herald; and the Logistae, the auditors. The members were called Eranistae, and there was an Archeranistes. This office could be held for many years together and was quite distinct from that of Epistates. The festivals, Hiera, were yearly; pro- bably at the Baccheia. There was a meeting, Synodos, the second day after the festival; and another, Syllogos, the 1 B. 2525, b, 2528;N. 353, 358; R. 1-281; F. I ; J. H. S. II. p. 354; Rev.A. 1864, p.469; B. C.H. IX. p.122; L. U. I, 50, 61, 64. 2 B ad. 2283, c. ' F. i. THE GODS. 87 month after the synod, and perhaps every month. The Epi- chyseis, the libations, was another of their ceremonies. Land was held by guilds and by unions of guilds for their festivals and also for the burial of their members. Thus, an eranist gave his guild a piece of land 50 yards by 32 in extent as a burial-ground: another paid 550 drachms {£22) costs in a lawsuit to defend the title to the grounds of a union of guilds, 560 to put the grounds in order, 100 for buildings on them and another 100 probably for furniture: and an archera- nist rebuilt certain walls and monuments after an earthquake at his own cost and paid over to the guild the money col- lected for the rebuilding. These men were all rewarded, as were others who had enlarged a guild or paid for its sacrifices'. In one case an archeranist receives rewards from his fellow eranists, but in all others the rewards are granted by a guild or by a union of guilds. The rewards were the title of Euer- getes, the benefactor : a laudatory speech : remission of all dues payable to the society for one or for two years : a wreath of gold, of young olive or of white poplar : a proclamation at the synods of a man's good works and his rewards : the dedication in a temple of a pillar engraved with a decree in a man's honour. With chaplets of gold the degree of the reward could be measured by the size: thus, one is to be made from ten pieces of gold {£^), another of the largest size allowed by law. With chaplets of leaves it was an honour to be crowned first at the synod. The chaplet of gold was most commonly granted 'for virtue.' One decree orders that a man's tomb be crowned with a chaplet of gold every year in Hyacinthos (July — August), and that his good works and rewards be proclaimed at the yearly synods for evermore; and for this it provides a sinking fund, trustees, and a separate account; imposes a fine of 100 drachmae {£4) on any one failing to carry out any part of these honours or bringing forward a motion to discontinue them; and declares that such motion should be of no effect. The dedication in a temple of a pillar bearing the decree of a guild in a man's honour > B. 2525, b; N. 358; J. H. S. 11. p. 354; B. C. H. IV. p. 138, v. p. 331. 88 RHODES. required the consent of the Senate and Commons of the city in whose territory the guild was established'. The end of setting up such engraved pillars was, as one decree puts it, "that it may be manifest to all that may here- after be born that the Lindians make a memorial of their worthy men to all time." The Mastroe and Lindians who ordered this decree, which referred to their sacrifices, to be set up in the temple of Athene at Lindos, directed the priest of Athene to pay for the pillar and inscription and the epi- statae to see that the work was done. The Camires directed the three men conducting the registration of the Ctoenae to contract at the lowest tender for supplying a pillar, inscribing and engraving the Ctcen^ thereon, setting it in the temple of Athene and fixing it there with lead in all security and seem- liness; and the treasurer was to pay the cost. The guild of the Euthalidje directed their treasurer to spend no more than fifty drachma {£2) in setting up a pillar engraved with a decree in honour of a member in the temple of Zeus Patroios at Netteia. The mastroe and lalysians, when ordering the temple of Alectrona to be kept holy, directed the treasurers to see that three pillars were made and the decree engraved thereon, and that one was set in the temple and the others on roads leading to it. The decree forbad various things to be brought into the temple, and these two last pillars must have served as notice boards. Three copies of a subscription list for the navy were set up in the great city; one in the Theatre, another in the temple of Asclepios, and the third in the Agora near the altar of Dionysos : presumably for greater publicity. The poletae were to contract for making these pillars and putting them up. The treaty between Rhodes and Hiera- pytna was to be engraved on two pillars, one for Hierapytna and the other for the temple of Athene in the city of Rhodes. The poletae were to contract for the Rhodian copy at a price not exceeding 100 drachmae {£^, and the treasurers were to pay for it. Foreign states sometimes engraved their decrees in honour of Rhodians on pillars and set them up at Rhodes. 1 B. 2525, b, 2528; N. 358; R. I. 282; F. I, 20, 52; J. H. S. II. p. 354; Rev. A. 1864, p. 469; L. U. 50, 61, 64. THE GODS. 89 Some of the decrees order the stone of the pillars to be Lartos, probably a local name: it is in fact foetid limestone'. The law against sacrilege protected material honours. Thus it was sacrilege to erase a word on an inscribed pillar, to steal a spear or a shield or a horse's bit from a statue, or even to carry off a faded wreath from a tomb: and for sacri- lege a man was liable to torture on the wheel or to death. Mere portrait statues were protected by this law if the for- mula "to the Gods" was added to the inscription on the base^ On capturing the great city, Artemisia set up there a bronze group of herself scourging Rhodes and dedicated it to the gods. The citizens held that it was not lawful for them to cast it down: but they removed it from their sight by building a wall round it and roofing it over, and then pro- claiming the place holy ground so that none might go therein I Just before the siege of 304 B.C. when there was still hope of peace the citizens set up statues of Antigonos and Demetrios. During the siege the Assembly was urged to cast these down, as it was not seemly that men who besieged the city should be honoured like those who aided it: but the motion was angrily thrown out*. And during the siege of 88 B.C. they respected the statue of Mithridates, though they were daily shooting at the king himself. In late times the custom of setting up statues was abused. At Lindos and in the great city statues were set up not only to the Csesars and their wives" and the officials of the province' but to nearly every Roman who touched at the island. Indeed, Romans cared more for a statue at Rhodes than at Athens or Byzantion. To meet this demand the Rhodians used up their old statues. The strategos would take off the old inscriptions and put up others till some figures had done duty for Greeks, Romans, Macedonians and Persians. Sometimes the strategos was careless and assigned an old man's statue to ' N. 343, 349, 351, 357; J. H. S. * Diodoros, xx. 81, 93. II. p. 354; M. 185-2, p. 79; F. 5. ' Cicero, in Vetrem, 11. 2, 65. ' Dio Chrysostom, pp. 6io — 612, " R. A. 2o, 28, 29, 30; L. U. 54. 614. ' F. 7, 8, 9. ^ Vitruvius, II. 41. 90 RHODES. a young man, or an athlete's to an invalid, or that of a general on horseback marshalling his troops to some man too lazy to leave his litter. But when a statue was once named after a Roman they hesitated about changing the name, and the Caesars were always allowed new statues'. Portrait statues were often set up by the people themselves or by their rela- tions. Thus a girl's statue was set up by her mother, her sister, her maternal grandfather and grandmother, her maternal uncle, and her mother's second husband". A cheaper honour was to set up a silver mask: this could be done for nine drachmae {7l6y. At Camiros they engraved the names and honours of commanders on shields of white marble*. At Lindos the same group of honours was commonly granted ; and women could receive it with a few variations. It con- sisted of a laudatory speech, a wreath of gold, a bronze statue, the right to wear a wreath and sit in a place of honour at the sacred games or at the solemn assemblies, maintenance in the Hierothyteion, and proclamation of those honours for ever- more. A similar group was granted in the great city'. Such honours served for international courtesies. Thus the Com- mons of Ilios crowned the Commons of Rhodes". In 201 B.C. the Athenians sent a wreath of gold to the Rhodians for their valour; and in 167 B.C. the Rhodians sent to the Romans a wreath made from ten thousand pieces of gold (;^8,ooo), or from twenty thousand according to another account; and then set up in the temple of Athene in the great city a statue of the Commons of Rome forty-five feet in height'. Hiero and Gelon set up in the great city a group of the Commons of Syracuse crowning the Commons of Rhodes'. In some cases a tenth or a firstfruit was spent in setting up a statue^ The road leading up to the Acropolis of Camiros on its landward side seems to have been a sacred way bordered ' Dio Chrysostom, pp. 569, 589, 613, 68, 69, 70; B. C. H. ix. p. 96. 6i2, 623, 648 ; cf. R. A. 20. * B. 3598. 2 F. II. ' Polybios, xvi. 26, xxx. 5, xxxi. ' R. H. 23; B. 1570. 16; Livy, xxxi. is, XLV. 25. " N. 353. ' Polybios, v. 88. 5 R, A. I, 21, 22; R. H. 23; F. 4, 'J R. A. 10, 13; B. C. H. ix. 106. THE GODS. 91 with statues, of which fragments have been found. Many of the tombs in the valley below are rock-cut chambers ap- proached by vertical shafts, like the typical Egyptian tombs ; and in many cases large jars containing children's bones have been buried in these shafts after the tomb chambers them- selves had been filled. Curiously the finest tombs contained coins of the great city, and therefore were in use when Camiros was presumably falling to decay. The finest tomb at Lindos apparently belongs to the Ilnd century B.C. In front there have been twelve Doric columns about 15 feet high hewn in the rock, four in the centre standing clear and giving access to the tomb chamber, the other eight engaged. Above these have been architrave, frieze and cornice: and upon that four marble altars. Just to the south of the present city of Rhodes are remains of a remarkable monument, hewn out of a sand- stone hillock. On a square base of about 90 feet each way it rose vertically to a height of about 20 feet, and above that there was probably a pyramid. Three steps led to the base, and from the highest of these rose twenty-one en- gaged columns on each side. These are unfluted and their capitals are lost : but they were probably Doric, as they have no bases. Within are two chambers surrounded by various niches. These chambers together occupy only about a quarter of the area of the base, and there may be others entered by some hidden door. The entrance to these is ostentatiously marked by the altered spacing of the columns. The monument is rather Phcenician than Greek in character, but there is nothing to shew its age. In late times the authorities merely followed public opinion in changing the inscriptions on the statues of the gods so often that it was hard to know one from another, for all the gods were then commonly regarded as a single power and force. Nor did they spend more on sacrifices than on new statues: they put on their garlands and went to the altars, but they made no offering, and then went their way deeming they had sacrificed'. There is, however, little trace of other religions. When Tiberius was living in the island there were ^ Dio Chrysostom, pp. 569, 570. 92 RHODES. many Chaldseans there, who gained a livelihood by casting horoscopes and teaching astrology'. About this time Dio- genes the grammarian disputed only on the seventh day". This points to the Jewish influence, that might be expected in a great commercial city. And the Jewish community in Rhodes was of importance a century before'. The Apostle Paul passed Rhodes on the return from his third journey, but apparently did not land*. There is a tradition that he afterwards preached at Lindos : probably when he visited Crete and Ephesos in the time of the Pastoral Epistles. ^ Tacitus, Annales, vi. 20, 21. ^ Maccabees, I. xv. 23. ^ Suetonius, Tiberius, 32. * Acts, xxi.' i. VI. ART. The materials for the history of ancient art in Rhodes fall into two groups. On the one hand are passages from ancient writers and inscriptions referring to the works of art in the island or to the men who made them. Of the works thus noticed there remain only the Laocoon in the Vatican and the group commonly called the Tore Farnese in the Museum at Naples. On the other hand are several thousand antiqui- ties discovered in the island of late years. These all belong to minor arts that were ignored by ancient writers : but they are of interest now in the absence of greater works. The groups are so distinct that they are best treated apart. Rhodes was an abode of the legendary Telchines ; and in historic times certain ancient statues were called after them, Apollo Telchinios at Lindos, Hera and the Nymphs Tel- chinis at lalysos, and again Hera Telchinia at Camiros'. These statues must have been of metal, for the Telchines were the patrons of metal work just as the Cyclopes were the patrons of stone work. The. earliest metal statues in Greece were made of wrought plates nailed to a framework of wood ; and these were presumably of that class. The Telchines probably reappear in a Rhodian legend as the Heliadas. Athene granted them to master with cunning hands every art of mortals, and the highways bore their handiwork in the likeness of men and creeping things. Indeed, they chained 1 Diodoros, v. 55. 94 RHODES. up their statues by the legs to hinder them from walking abroad'. The Homeric legend of the golden handmaidens of Hephsestos and the gold and silver dogs that kept watch over the palace of Alcinoos belongs to this order of thought. In the temple of Athene at Lindos was a cup made of electron-; that is, of mingled gold and silver. Tradition said it was the gift of Helen and had been moulded on her breasts^ The notion recalls the electron masks moulded on the faces of the dead heroes at Mycenae. There was also " a notable bronze caldron, fashioned to the ancient form and bearing an inscription in Phoenician letters." It was accounted the gift of Cadmos'. This reference to the legendary founder of the Phoenician priesthood of Poseidon at lalysos suggests that the caldron was the gift and perhaps the work of the Phoenicians in that city. The earliest statue of Athene Lindia was a post, just as the earliest statue of Hera at Samos was a plank. Tradition ascribed its dedication to Danaos, the legendary founder of the temple^ Like other primitive Greek statues, it was draped. There is extant a subscription list for the renovation of Athene's robes at Lindos^; and possibly it was for this statue that Amasis of Egypt sent to Athene Lindia a cuirass of fine linen, wherein each thread was spun from as many strands as there were days in the year°. There was another statue of Athene Lindia. Cedren, who apparently had seen it, says that it was six feet in height and made of 'Kldo