f^pWMl Cornell University Library BR60 .W71 1846 olin 3 1924 029 189 979 Cornell University Library The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/cletails/cu31924029189979 THE GENUINE EPISTLES APOSTOLICAL FATHERS, ST. ^MENT, ST. IGNATIUS, ST. POIYCARP, ST. BARNABAS, THE PASTOR Of HERMAS; AND AN ACCOUNT OF THE MAETYRDOMS OF ST. IGNATIUS AND ST. POLYCARP, WRITTEN BY THOSE WHO WERE PRESENT AT THEIR SUFFERINGS. BEIKG, TOGETHEK WITH aijc f olg 0aiptnws of tl)e Ncto ecestament, A COMPLETE COLLECTION OF THE MOST PRIMITIVE ANTIQUITY FOR ABOUT A HUNDRED AND FIFTY TEARS AFTER CHRIST. TRANSLATED AND PUBLISHED, WITH PRELIMINARY DISCOURSES, BY THE MOST REVEREND FATHER IN GOD, WILLIAM, LATE LORD ARCHBISHOP OF CANTERBURY. PBOM THE SEVENTH LONDON EDITION. PHILADELPHIA: PUBLISHED BY AN ASSOCIATION OF GENTLEMEN. AGENT, Bet. R. DAVIS, assisted bt GEO. W. GORTON, Esq. Office, No. 66 North Thibd Street. steeeoxyped by l. johnson and co. — libraky edition. 1846. GENUINE REMAINS OF THE APOSTOLICAL FATHERS, PART I. IN \7HICH ARE COMFRISED I. The Epistle of St. Clement to the Corinthians. II. The Epistle of St. Polycarp to the Phihppians. III. The Epistles of St. Ignatius. IV. A Relation of the Martyrdom of St. Ignatius, V. A Relation of the Martyrdom of St. Polycarp. PART II. IN WHICH ARE COmFRISED I. The Epistle of St. Barnabas. II. The Shepherd of Hennas. AND III. Part of the Second Epistle of St. Clement to the Corinthians. ui THE ARCHBISHOP'S PREFACE. Having, in the second edition* of "The ApostoUcal Fathers," so far improved the translation I hefore pubhshed of them, as to render it almost a new work, it will be neces- sary for me to give some account of the changes that have been made in it, and what advantages I have had for the making of them. The Epistles of St. Clement had been so correctly set forth from the Alexandrian manuscript, by the learned Mr. Patrick Young, that having no other copy to recur to, there are no considerable alterations to be expected in the present edition of them. And yet, even in these, I have not only carefully reviewed my translation, and compared it with the original Greek, and corrected whatsoever I thought to be less exact in it, but, by the help of a new and more accu- rate collation of Mr. Young's copy, with that venerable MS. from which it was taken, I have amended some places in the text itself, which had hitherto escaped all the editors of these epistles. For this I was beholden to the friendly assistance of the very learned and pious Dr. Grabe ; to whose ready help these Apostolical Fathers owe a great part of that ex- actness, with which, I presume, they will appear in this edition of them. * The present is a reprint from the seventh edition. VI PREFACE. The Epistles of St. Ignatius having been lately pub- lished at Oxford, by our Reverend Dr. Smith, not only with a much greater correctness in the text than ever they V(rere before, but with the advantage of his own and Bishop Pearson's observations upon the difficult places of them, it cannot be thought but that I must have very much improved my translation of those epistles, from the learned labours of two such eminent masters of antiquity ; and who had taken such great care, not only to restore those venerable pieces to their primitive purity, but to render them clear and intel- ligible to the meanest capacities. One of these epistles had never been set forth from any good MS. in its original Greek, when I published my first edition of them. This, together with the martyrdom of that blessed saint, has since been printed by Monsieur Ruinard at Paris, and from thence by Dr. Grabe at Oxford. I have compared my translation of both with their copy ; and not only corrected it where it disagreed with that, but have noted in the margin the chief variations of this last edition, from those which had been published by Archbishop Usher, and Isaac Vossius before. Of the Epistle, and Martyrdom, of St. Polycarp, and the Epistle of Barnabas, I have little to say more than that I have revised the translation of them with all the care I could, and rendered it much more correct (especially the Epistle of Barnabas) than it was before. But as for the Books of Hermas, I may without vanity affirm, that they are not only more exact in the translation than they were before, but that the very books themselves will be found in greater purity in this than in any other edition that has ever yet been pubhshed of them. The old Latin version has been entirely collated with an ancient manuscript of it in the Lapibeth library ; and from thence amended in more places than could well have been imagined. And that very version itself has been farther improved from a multitude of new fragments of the original Greek never before observed ; and PREFACE. Vii for the most part taken out of the late magnificent edition of the Works of St. Athanasius ; though that piece he none of his, but the work of the Younger Athanasius, patriarch of the same church, who Hved about the seventh century. [See torn. II. p. 251, Doctrin. ad Antioch. Bucem.'] Both these advantages I do hkewise owe to the same learned person" I before mentioned ; who not only purposely collated the one for me, but readily communicated tb me the extracts he had made for his own use out of the other. Having said thus much concerning the several pieces themselves here set forth, and the translation of them, I shall not trouble the reader with any long account of my own introductory discourse ; in which I have added some things, and corrected others. I hope, as it now stands, it may be of some use to those who have not any better opportunities of being acquainted with these matters ; and convince them of the just regard that is due to the discourses which follow it, upon this double account, both that they were (for the most part) truly written by those whose names they bear, and that those writers lived so near the apostolical times, that it cannot be doubted but that they do indeed represent to us the doctrine, government, and discipline of the church, as they received it from the apostles; the apostles from Christ, and that blessed Spirit, who directed them both in what they taught, and in what they ordained. What that doctrine, government, and discipline is, I have particularly shown in the eleventh chapter of my discourse. I shall only observe here, that it is so exactly agreeable to the present doctrine, government, and discipline of the church of England by law established, that no one who allows of the one can reasonably make any exceptions against the other. So that we must either say, that the immediate successors of the apostles had departed from the institutions of those holy men from whom they received their instruction "Dr. Grabe. VIU PREFACE. in the gospel of Christ, and by whom they were converted to the faith of it ; or, if that be too unreasonable to be sup- posed of such excellent persons, who not only lived in some of the highest stations of the Christian church, but the most of them suffered martyrdom for the sake of it, we must then conclude, what is indeed the truth, that the church of Eng- land, whereof we are members, is, both in its doctrine, government, discipline, and worship, truly apostolical; and in all respects comes the nearest up to the primitive pattern of any Christian church at this day in the world. GENERAL CONTENTS. PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE RELATING TO THE SEVERAL TREATISES, AND THE AUTHORS OF THEM. CHAPTER I. FACE Introduction 1 CHAPTER II. That the pieces here put together are all that remain of the most primitive and apostolical antiquity 2 CHAPTER III. Of the authority of the following Treatises ; and the deference that ought to be paid to them upon the account of it . . 14 CHAPTER IV. Of the subject of the following Discourses, and of the use that is to be made of them 23 CHAPTER V. Of the manner after which these Discourses are written, and the simplicity of style used in them 30 b CONTENTS. THE FIRST PART. Preliminary Discourse on the First Epistle of St. Clement to the Corinthians 33 The First Epistle of St. Clement to the Corinthians. ... 42 I. II. He commends them for their excellent Order and Piety in Christ, before their Schism brake out. III. How their Divisions began. IV. v. YI. Envy and Emulation the Original of all Strife and Disorder. Exam- ples of all Mischiefs they have occasioned. VII. VIII. He exhorts them to look up to the Rules of their Religion, and repent of their Divisions, and they shall be forgiven. IX. X. To encourage them whereunto he sets before them the examples of Holy Men whose Piety is recorded in the Scriptures. XI. XII. And particularly such as have been emineVit for their Kindness and Charity to their Neighbours. XIII. Wliat Rules our Religion has left us to this purpose. XIV. XV. Which he applies to the Case of the Corinthians, exhorting them to put an end to their Contentions so contrary to their Duty. XVI. XVII. XVIII. In order to this, he advises them to be humble ; and that from the Examples of our Saviour, and of holy Men in all Ages. XEX. XX. He returns to the Business of their Divisions, which, by more Argu- ments, he again persuades them to compose. XXI. He exhorts them to Obedience, from the consideration of the Goodness of God, and of his Presence in every Place. XXII. XXni. XXIV. Of Faith ; and particularly what we are to believe as to the future Resurrection. XXV. to XXVn. This Article at large proved. XXVni. He again exhorts them to Obedience : That it is impossible to escape the Vengeance of God, if we continue in Sin. XXIX. This farther enforced ftom the consideration of their Relation to God, as his Elect. XXX. How we must live that we may please God. XXXI. XXXn. We are justified by Faith. XXXni. Yet this must not lessen our Care to live well, nor our Pleasure in it CONTENTS. XI XXXrV. This enforced from the Examples of the holy Angels, and from the ex- ceeding greatness of that Reward which God has prepared for us. XXXV. XXXVI. We must attain unto this Reward by Faith and Obedience. XXXVII. Which we must carry oh in an orderly pursuing of the Duties of our several Stations, without Envying or Contentions. XXXVIII. The necessity of different Orders among Men. We have none of us any thing but what we received of God: whom, therefore, we ought in every condition thankfiiUy to obey. XXXIX. &c. From whence he exhorts them to do every thing orderly in the church, as the only way to please God. XLn. The Orders of Ministers in Christ's Church, established by the Apostles, ac- cording to Christ's command. XLin. And after the example of Moses. XLrV. Therefore they who have been duly placfed in the Ministry, according to their order, cannot, without great Sin, be put out of it. XLV. &c. He exhorts them to Peace, from Examples out of the Holy Scriptures. XL VII. XLVm. Particularly from St. Paul's Exhortation to them. XLIX. The Value which God puts upon Love and Unity : The Effects of a true Charity. L. Which is the Gift of God, and must be obtained by Prayer. LI. Ln. He exhorts such as have been concerned in these Divisions to repent, and return to their Unity, confessing their Sin to God. LIII. LIV. Which he enforces from the example of Moses. LV. Nay, of many among the Heathen; and of Judith and Esther among the Jews. LVI. The Benefit of mutual Advice and Correction. LVII. He entreats them to follov? that which is here given to them. LVni. Recommends them to God. LIX. Desires speedily to hear that this epistle has had a good Effect upon them. LX. And so concludes. Preliminary Discourse on the Epistle of St. Polycarp to the Philip- pians 69 The Epistle of St. Polycarp to the Philippians .... 78 Afteh the Saiutatiotst, 1. He commends the PHrLippiAns for their respect to those who suffered for the gospel, and for their own faith and piety. I. XU CONTENTS. 8. He exhorts them to continue in both ; and that particularly, from the considera- tion of the resurrection and judgment to come. II. For their better accomplishing whereof, 3. He advises them to call to mind the doctrine which St. Pin had taught them, whilst he was in person among them, and after wrote to them in his epistle, m. The sum of all which he now goes on particularly to set before them : I. As TO Practicai Duties. 1. Faith, hope, charity. III. 2. Against covetousness. IV. 3. The duties of husbands, wives, widows. lb. 4. Of deacons, young men, virgins. V. 5. Of presbyters. VI. All which he again enforces with the consideration of that account we must one day give to God of all our actions. II. As to Matters of Faith. 1. What we are to believe concerning our Saviour Christ, his nature, and suffer- ings. VII. 2. Of the future resurrection and judgment. lb. Which being thus set forth, he finally exhorts them, 1. To prayer. VII. 2. To steadfastness in their faith. VIII. Enforced from the examples of the patience and constancy Of our Saviour Christ. lb. Of his apostles and saints. IX. 3. To carefulness in all well-doing. X. And more particularly yet, from the miscarriage of Valens, who had been a presby- ter among them, he exhorts them, 4. To beware of covetousness. XI. 5. Not to be too severe towards such persons, either in their censures of them, or behaviour towards them. XII. He prays for them, and then exhorts them, 6. To pray for all others. lb. And having thus done with what was instructive of his epistle, he advertises them of his sending Ignatius's epistles to them. XIII. And desires an account of him from them. XIV. CONTENTS. xiii And, lastly, he recommends Crescens, by whom he wrote this epistle, together with his sister, to their favour and assistance, lb. Preliminary Discourse on the Epistles of St. Ignatius The Epistle of St. Ignatius to the Ephesians .... 92 Atteb the Salutatiok, I. He thanks them for sending Onesimus, their bishop, to him, whom he greatly commends, and expresses his joy to receive from him so good a character of them. II. He mentions the rest of their members who were sent with Onesimus to him, and exhorts them to unity, by a due subjection to their bishops and presbyters. III. He excuses the liberty he takes of admonishing them, and so returns to his ad- vice to them ; IV. Which is still the same ; namely, by a due subjection to their bishop, to pre- serve unity among themselves : V. The benefit of which he particularly sets out to them. VI. That they ought not to respect their bishop the less, because he is not forward in exacting it from them ; but should rather honoiu: him the more ; which he also commends them for doing. Vn. He warns them against heretics ; bidding them stick to their Master, Jesus Christ, whose divine and human nature he declares to them, Vm. IX. He commends them for their care to keep themselves from false teachers, and shows them the way to Ood. X. He exhorts them to prayer, and to behave themselves unblamably towards those that are without ; XI. Xn. To be careful of their salvation ; to pray for lumsel^ whose own worth he much lessens in comparison of theirs ; especially, Xm. XrV. To be frequent in public devotion : to live in unity, in faith and in cha- rity: and XV. To show forth the truth of their profession by their works : XVI. XVn. To have a care that the gospel of Christ be not corriqited : XVIII. Upon which occasion he treats particularly of the three great mysteries of Christianity, viz. the virginity of Mary, and the incarnation and death of Christ, which he says were hid from the Devil. XIX. How the birth of Christ was, in a most extraordinary manner, revealed to the world. XIY tONTENTS. XX. XXI. Of all which he promises to write more largely in a second epistle, and then finally undertakes for their salvation, if they continued, as he had eihorted them, to pursue it, by unity among themselves and piety towards God. The Epistle of St. Ignatius to the Magnesians ... 98 After the Saiutation, he ssciAitES, I. The occasion of his writing to them, and to the other churches that were about them ; and then mentions, II. The arrival of Damas, their bishop and of the rest whom they had sent unto him. III. He exhorts them to all due reverence and subjection to their bishop ; notwith- standing he " was but a young man, and had not long been in that great office among them. rV. Which also they must show if they will be Christians indeed. V. That we must all die in a little time ; and then be for ever either happy or mise- rable. » VI. He exhorts them, therefore to live orderly, and to maintain a unity among each other. VII. And that especially by a due subjection to their bishop and presbyters. VIII. K. X. He cautions them against false opinions, especially those of Ebion ' and the Judaizing Christians. XI. He apologizes for this advice, which he gave not to reprove, but to forewarn them. Xn. Whose faith and piety he here greatly commends ; and XIII. Exhorts them to go on and increase in both. XrV. He desires their prayers, both for himself and his church at Antioch. XV., And then concludes all with the salutations of those who were present with him at the VTriting of this epistle. The Epistle of St. Ignatius to the Trallians .... 102 The SALUTATioif L He acknowledges the coming of their bishop, and his receipt of their charity by him. II. He commends them for their orderly subjection to their bishops, priests, and deacons ; and exhorts them to continue in it. » Coteler. in loc. ' Pearson. Vind. Ign. par. ii. cap. 4. CONTENTS. XV ni. He enforces the same exhortation, commends their bishop, and excuses his not writing more fully to them of this matter ; IV. Which he does not, lest he should seem to take too much upon him, and be too much exalted in his own conceit, which would be very dangerous to him, who is afraid even of his over-great desire to suffer, lest it should be prejudicial to him. V. Another reason why he did not write more largely to them was, that at present tbey were not able to bear it. YI. He warns them against heretics who poison the sound word of Christ ; and Vn. Exhorts them, by humility of mind, and unity with the church, to guard them- selves against them : Vin. And this he does, not that he knows of any present need they had of his ad- vice, but to prevent any mischief from falling upon them : JX. To which end, he briefly sets before them the true doctrine concerning Christ ; X. And particularly exposes the error of some, who taught that he seemed only to die, but did not really suffer. XI. From these he would have them flee. Xn. He returns again to his exhortation of them to unity ; and desires their prayers of which he was much in need ; Xm. Which also he begs for his church at Antioch. And having given them the salutations of those who were with him, and once more exhorted them to due submission to their bishop, &c., he concludes. The Epistle of St. Ignatius to the Romans 106 The Salutation. I. He testifies his desire to come unto them; and his hopes of suffering for Christ unless they prevent it, — n. Which he earnestly entreats them not to do ; III. But rather to pray for him, that God would strengthen him to the combat unto which he had called him. IV. He expresses the great desire he had to suffer martyrdom, v. VI. And the mighty advantage it would be to him so to do ; vn. Vni. And therefore again entreats them, that they would not do any thing to prevent it. IX. He desires their prayers for his church at Antioch ; and expresses the kindness of the Christians to him on his way to them: XVI CONTENTS. X. And then concludes, with liis recommendations of those who came from Syria with him, and were gone before to Rome, to their favourable acceptance. In the Second Edition this Epistle was compared with the Greek set out by Dr. Gbabe in his Spicileg. torn. ii. p. 13, &c. The Epistle of St. Ignatius to the Philadelphians . . .110 The Saldtatiow. I. He begins with a very great commendation of their bishop, whom they had sent unto him. II. He warns them against divisions ; and exhorts them to stick close to their bishop, as the best means to avoid &Iling into errors and false doctrines; III. rV. Which exhortation he again enforces, and shows them the danger of follow- ing any persons, to the making of a schism in the church. V. He excuses the length of this advice, which proceeded from his love towards them ; desires their prayers ; and shows how the holy men under the law, as well as since imder the gospel, were all united in Christ : VI. Yet this must not prompt them to receive their doctrine who would tempt ihem to Judaize. Vn. He declares what his own conduct had been whilst he was amongst them ; ym. IX. And exhorts them, afier his example, to maintain a pure doctrine, in unity with one another. X. He recounts to them how he had heard that the persecution was stopped in his church at Antioch ; and directs them to send some messenger thither to con- gratulate with them thereupon. XI. He tells them what persons were still with him ; and thanks them for the kind entertainment they gave to some of them : and so concludes with the common salutation of those who were present at his writing of this epistle to them. The Epistle of St. Ignatius to the Smyrnasans . . . .114 The SALUTATioif. I. He declares the joy he had to hear of their firmness in the gospel : the substance of which, as to what concerns the person of Christ, he briefly repeats to them : II. And this against such as pretend that Christ suffered only in show, and not really. Against these, in. He assures them that he knew Christ was a true man, even after his resurrec- tion ; and did give manifest proofs to his disciples of his being such. CONTENTS. Xvii IV. He exhorts theiUi therefore, to have nothing to do with those heretics whom he here opposes ; nor believes that he would suffer so much for the faith of Christ, unless he were very sure of the truth of it. V. He shows them, farther, the danger of the doctrine before mentioned ; and how they who held it did, in effect, deny Christ. VI. How dangerous this is ! And bow different those who maintain this doctrine are, in all other respects, from the church of Christ ! yn. That it will, therefore, become them to guard themselves against such persons. Vm. To this end he exhorts them to follow their bishop and pastors ; but especially their bishop. TX. He thanks them for their kindness to himself. X. And to those which were with him, which God will reward. XI. He acquaints them with the ceasing of the persecution at Antioch : he exhorts them to send a messenger thither, to congratulate with them on this occasion. XIL He concludes with his own salutation, and the remembrance of those that were with him, to them all in general, to several in particular. The Epistle of St. Ignatius to St. Polycarp . . .118 The Salutatioit. I. He blesses God for the firm establishment of Polycarp in all piety, and gives him many particular directions for his improvement in it. n. But especially with relation to the church over which he was bishop. m. IV. He continues his advice to him ; and V. Teaches him what advice he should give to others : VI. In which he continues ; and especially enforces unity among themselves, and subjection to their bishop. Vn. He recounts to Polycarp the peace of his church in Syria : and directs him to appoint some messenger to go to Antioch to rejoice with them on that occasion. vm. He desires Polycarp to write to the same effect to the neighbouring churches, which he had not himself time to do ; And then concludes all with his salutation both to Polycarp and to several of the church of Smyrna, by name. Preliminary Discourse on the Martyrdom of St. Ignatius, written by those who were present at his sufierings 131 A Relation of the Martyrdom of St. Ignatius .... 138 Preliminary Discourse of the Martyrdom of St. Polycarp, and of the Epistle written by the Church of Smyrna concerning it . . 133 c XVm CONTENTS. Circular Epistle of the Church of Smyrna, concerning the Martyrdom of St. Polycarp 140 THE SECOND PART. Preliminary Discourse of the Catholic Epistle of St. Barnabas . 148 The Catholic Epistle of St. Barnabas 161 I, The salutation and preface to the following epistle. n. in. That God has abolished the legal sacrifice, to introduce the spiritual right- eousness of the Gospel. IV. The prophecies of Daniel concerning the ten kings, and the coming of Christ. V. VI. That Christ was to suffer proved from the prophecies concerning him. Vn. The scape-goat an evident type of this. Vni. The red heifer another type of Christ. IX. Of the circumcision of the ears ; and how, in the first institution of circum- cision, Abraham mystically foretold Christ by name. X. That the commands of Moses, concerning clean and unclean beasts, &c., were all designed for a spiritual signification. XI. Xn. Baptism and the cross of Christ foretold in figures under the law. Xm. The promise of God not made to the Jews only, but to the Gentiles also. XIV. And fulfilled to us by Jesus Christ. XV. That the Sabbath of the Jews was but the figure of a more glorious Sabbath to come — XVI. Their temple of the spiritual temples of God. XVII. The conclusion of the former part of this epistle. XVni. He goes on to the other part, which relates to practice : this he divides into two considerations ; the former of the way of light ; the latter of the way of darkness. XIX. Of the way of light ; being a summary of what a Christian is to do, that he may be happy for ever. XX. Of the way of darkness ; that is, what kind of persons shall be for ever cast out of the kingdom of God. XXI. The close of all ; being an earnest exhortation to them to live so that they may be blessed to all eternity. Preliminary Discourse on the Shepherd of St. Hermas ; and on the Second Epistle of St. Clement to the Corinthians . . . .182 CONTENTS. xSx The First Book of St. Hermas, which is called his Visions . 191 Vision I. AoAiNST filthy and proud thoughts; also the neglect of Hennas in chastising his children. II. Again, of his neglect in correcting his talkative wife and his lewd sons. HI. Of the building of the church triumphant; and of the several orders of repro- bates. IV. Of the trial and tribulation that is about to come upon men. The Second Book of St. Hennas, which is called his Commands 207 AH INTBOnUCTIOH TO THE FOILOWIIfO COHHAKDS . C'ommand I. Of believing in one God. n. That we must avoid detraction, and do our alms-deeds with simplicity. III. Of avoiding lying : and the repentance of Hermas for his dissimulation. IV. ,0f putting away one's wife for adultery. V. Of the sadness of the heart, and of patience. YI. That every man' has two angels; and of the suggestions of both. Vn. That we must fear God, but not the devil. Wll. That we must flee &om evil, and do good. EX. That we must ask of God daily, and without doubting. X. Of the sadness of the heart; and that we must take heed not to grieve the Spirit of God that is in us. XI. That the spirits and prophets are to be tried by their works ; and of a two-fold spirit. Xn. Of a two-fold desbe : that the commands of G6d are not impossible ; and that the devil is not to be feared by them that believe. The Third Book of St. Hermas, which is called his SimiUtades . 226 ^Similitude I. That seeing we have no abiding city in this world, we ought to look after that which is to come. II. As the vine is supported by the elm, so is the rich man helped by the prayers of the poor. n HI. As the green trees in winter cannot be distinguished from the dry ; so neither can the righteous from the wicked in this present world. XX CONTENTS. IV. As in the summer the living trees are distinguished from the dry by their firuit and green leaves ; so in the world to come, the righteous shall be distinguished from the unrighteous by their happiness. V. Of a true fast, and the reward of it; also of the cleanness of the body. VT. Of two sorts of voluptuous men ; and of their death, defection, and of the con- tinuance of their pains. VII. That they who repent, must bring forth fruits worthy of repentance. Vin. That there are many kinds of elect and of repenting sinners : and how all of them shall receive a reward proportionable to the measure of their repentance and good works. IX. The greatest mysteries of the militant and triumphant church which is to be built. X. Of repentance and alms-deeds. The Second Epistle of St. Clement to the Corinthians . . 270 I. That we ought to entertain a worthy opinion of our salvation, and to do the ut- most that in us lies to express the value we put upon it, by a sincere obedience to our Saviour Christ and his gospel. II. That God had before prophesied by Isaiah that the Gentiles should be saved. ni. IV. That this ought to engage such especially to be very careful to live well, without which they will still miscarry. V. That whilst we secure to ourselves the favour of God, and the reward of the other world, we need not fear what can befal us in this. VI. That we cannot serve God and Mammon ; nor, if we follow the interests of this present world, is it possible for us to escape the punishment of the other. Vn. The consideration of which ought to bring us to repentance and holiness. Vni. And that presently ; knowing that now, whilst we are in this world, is the only time for repentance. IX. We shall rise, and be judged in those bodies in which we now are ; therefore we must live well in them. X. That we ought, as we value our own interests, to live well, however few seem to mind what really is for their advantage ; XI. And not to deceive ourselves with any vain imaginations, as if no punishment should remain for us who do evil, or good happen unto us hereafter, if we be- have ourselves as we ougbt to do ; seeing God will certainly judge us and render to all of us according to our works ; and how soon this may be we can none of us tell. General Index 295 PEELIMINAEY DISCOURSE KELATINQ TO THE SEVEEAL TREATISES HEREIN CONTAINED, AND THE AUTHORS OF THEM. CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION. 1. Had I designed the following collection either for the benefit or perusal of the learned world, I should have needed to say but very little by. way of introduction to it, the editors of the several treatises here put together having already observed so much upon each of them that it would, I believe, be difficult to discover — I am sure would be very needless to trouble the reader with — any more. 2. But, as it would be ridiculous for me to pretend to have designed a translation for those who are able with much more profit and satis- faction to go to the originals, so, being now to address myself to those especially who want that ability, I suppose it may not be amiss, before I lead them to the discourses themselves, to give them some account both of the authors of the several pieces I have here collected, and of the tracts themselves, and of that collection that is now the first time made of them in our own tongue ; though, as to the first of these, I shall say the less by reason of that excellent account that has been already given of the most of them by our pious and learned Dr. Cave, whose Lives of the Apostles and Primitive Fathers, with his otlier admirable discourse on Primitive Christianity, I could heartily wish were in the hands of all the more judicious part of our English readers. 3. Nor may such an account as I now propose to myself to give of the following pieces be altogether useless to some even of the learned themselves, who, wanting either the opportunity of collecting the several authors necessary for such a search, or leisure to, examine them, may not be unwilling to see that faithfully brought together, under one short and general view, which would have required some time and labour to have searched out, as it lay diffiised in a multitude of writers, out of which they must otherwise have gathered it. ' 1 A 1 PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE. CHAPTER ir. THAT THE PIECES HERE PUT TOGETHER ARE ALL THAT REMAIN OF THE MOST PRIMITIVE AND APOSTOLICAL ANTIQUITY. That there are several other Treatises pretended to have been written within the com- pass of this period ; but none such as truly come up to it — Of the Epistle of our Saviour Christ to Abgarus, and the occasion of it — That it is not probable that any such Letter was written by him — The Epistles ascribed to the Virgin Mary spurious ; so is the Epistle pretended to have been written by St. Paul to the Laodiceans — Of the Acts, the Gospel, the Preaching, and Revelations of St. Peter — Of the Liturgy attributed to St. Matthew, and the Discourse said to have been written by him con- cerning the Nativity of the Blessed Virgin — Of the Liturgies ascribed to St. Peter, St. Mark, and St. James — Of the Gospels attributed to several of the Apostles — Of the Apostles' Creed, and the Canons called Apostolical — Of the other pieces under the names of St. Clement and St. Ignatius ; and particularly of the Recognitions and Epitome of Clement — Of the History of the Life, Miracles, and Assumption of St. John, pretended to have been written by Prochorus, one of the seven Deacons — Of the Histories of St. Peter, and St. faul, ascribed to Linus, bishop of Rome — Of the Lives of the Apostles, attributed to Abdias, bishop of Babylon — Of the Epistles of St. Martial — Of the Passion of St. Andrew, written by the Presbyters of Achaia — Of the Works ascribed to Dianysius the Areopagite — That, upon the whole, the pieces here put together are all that remain of the apostolical times, after the Books of the Holy Scripture. « 1. Having said thus much concerning the several pieces here put together, and the authors of them,* it is time to go on to the other part of this discourse, and consider what may be fit to be observed con- cernihg them all together, as they are now set forth in our language, in the following collection. 2. Now the first thing that may be fit to be taken notice of is, that the following collection is truly what the title pretends it to be, a full and perfect collection of all the genuine writings that remain to us of the apostolical fathers, — and carries on the antiquity of the church, from the time of the Holy Scriptures of the New Testament, to about a hundred and fifty years after Christ. 3. To make this the more evident, it will be necessary for me to consider what those other writings are which some have endeavoured to raise up into the rank of apostolical antiquity, and to show that they are indeed writings either of no credit nor authority at all, or, at least, not of such as they are falsely pretended to be. And, to the end I may proceed the more clearly in this inquiry, I will divide the several now to be examined into the three following ranks : The first, of those which are antecedent to any I have here collected ; as being pretended to have been written either by our Saviour Christ himself, or by the Virgin Mary, or by the apostles. The second, of such other tracts as ______ • Reference is here made to the preliminai-y discourses now prefixed to the respective treatises to which they belong. TREATISES FALSELY CALLED APOSTOLICAL. 3 are ascribed to some of those fathers whose genuine remains I have here put together. And the third, of such pieces as are said to have been written by some other authors who lived in the apostolical times, and wrote, if we will believe some men, several books much more considerable than any I have here collected. 4. Of the first of these kinds is that pretended letter of our Blessed Saviour to Abgarus king of Edessa, a httle city of Arabia," a part of which country was subject to him. Now this may seem to be of so much the better credit, in that Eusebius' tells us he had himself faith- fully translated it out of the Syriac language, as he found it in the Archives of Edessa. Nor was it very long after that Ephraem," a deacon of that church, made mention of this communication between our Saviour and Abgarus, as the occasion of the first conversion of that place ;" and exhorted his people upon that account, the rather to hold fast to their holy profession, and to live worthy of it. Evagrius," who wrote about two hundred years after this, not only confirmed aR that had been said by both these, but added from Procopius several other circumstances, unknown, for aught that appears, to either of them ; particularly that of the impression which our Saviour had made of his face upon a napkin, and sent to that prince, which he tells us was of no small advantage to them m the defence of their town against Chosroes, king of Persia, who, by this means, was hindered from tak- ing it. How this circumstance came to be added to this relation, or by whom it was first invented, I cannot tell. But that both the inter- course reported by Eusebius* between our Saviour and this Prince, and the report of this picture being brought to him, have been received as a matter of unquestionable truth in those parts, the authority of Gregorius Abulpharjus' will not suffer us to doubt, who in his history, published by our learned Dr. Pococke, both recites the letters, and records the story in terms very little different from what the Greek writers before mentioned have done. 5. And now since the addition of this new circumstance to the old account of this matter, it is not to be wondered if the patrons of images among the Greeks, from henceforth, contended with all earnestness for the truth of both, insomuch that we find they instituted a particular festival in memory of it, August the 16th, and transcribed at large the whole history of this adventure into their Menseon, and recited it upon it. 6. It is, I. suppose, upon the same account that some of our 'ate authors, though they do not care to assert the truth of this story, are yet « Vid. Annot. Valesii in Euseb. pp. 18, 19. 'Hist. Eccles. lib. i. c. 13. « I'es- tam. S. Ephrsem. inter Oper. p. 788. "* Evagrii Hist. Eccles. lib. iv. cap. 27. • Eo clesiastical History, translated by the Rev. C. F. Cruse, A. M. 8vo. Bags'sr, Ijonioo. Hist. Dynast. Lat. p. 71, 73. 4 PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE. unwilling to deny all credit to it. Baronius" reports both the relation and the epistle from Eusebius, but will not answer for the truth of either. Spondanus' delivers the same from the cardinal that he had done from Eusebius, and passes no censure either one way or other upon it ; only in his margin he observes that Gretser the Jesuit, in his Discourse of Images, &c., had vindicated the authority of our Saviour's epistle to Abgarus from the exceptions of Casaubon, in his Exercita- tions upon Baronius, against it. Gerard Vossius," in his Scholia upon the Testament of St. Ephraem, contents himself to refer us to the au- thority of the ancients for the truth of this relation, who he pretends did, without controversy, look upon it to be authentic. And Velesius" himself, though he plainly enough shows that he was not out of all doubt concerning the truth of this story, yet neither does he utterly reject it, but rather endeavours to rectify those errors that seemed the most considerable in it. 7. But others, even of the church of Rome, have not observed so much caution in this particular. They roundly stand by the censure of Pope Gelasius,' who pronounced this epistle of our Saviour's to be apocryphal, and not only show by many probable arguments the false- ness of it, but, what is yet more, pass the same censure upon the story of the image too that Casaubon^ had done, notwithstanding all that Gret- ser could say in favour of it. Natahs Alexander^ delivers this con- clusion concerning it : " The Epistle of Abgarus to our Saviour, and his answer to it, are supposititious and apocryphal ;" and at large an- swers all that is usually urged in favour of them. And Du Pin" after him, yet more solidly convinces it of such manifest errors as may serve to satisfy all considering persons that Eusebius and Ephraem were too easy of belief in this particular, and did not sufficiently ex- amine into it when^they delivered that as a certain truth .which from several circumstances appears to have been evidently otherwise. 8. I shall not need to say any thing of the opinions of the learned men of the' reformed religion as to this matter, who generally agree in the same censure. But yet, seeing both Eusebius and St. Ephrtem have spoken with such confidence of this story, whose authority ought not to be lightly esteemed, I shall choose rather, with the middle sort," to leave it to every one to judge as he pleases, than determine any thing in this case. And, that they may the better do it, I will subjoin at length the two Epistles — as they are rendered by Eusebius from the " Annal. Eccl. ann. xxxi. num. 60. ' Epitom. Annal. Baron, annal. xxxi. num. 22. Annot. ad Oper. Ephraem. Syr. p. 796. ■' Annot. in Euseb. Hist. Eccles. p. 25, a. «Apud Gratian. Dist. xv. c. c. Simon Hist Crit. du N. T. chap. iii. p. 23. /Exercit. in Baron, xiii. sec. 31, p. 289. sSajcul. vol. i. p. 266. '■Nouvelle Bibl. vol. i. p. 1. * Vid. apud Basnagium Exercit. Hist. Crit. in Baron, ad ann. xliii. num. 18, p. 430. * Casaubon. Exerc. in Baron, xiii. p. 289. Montacutius, Orig. Eccles. torn. i. part 2, p. 63. Cave Hist. Litcraria, sec. i. p. 1, in Jesu Christo. TREATISES FALSELY .CALLED APOSTOLICAL. 5 original Syriac into Greek, and from him translated into our own tongue, Th£ Epistle of Ahgarus to our Bkssed Saviour. 9. « Abgarus, prince of Edessa, to Jesus the good Saviour, who has appeared in the country about Jerusalem, health. I have received an account of thee and thy cures, how without any medicines or herbs they are done by thee. For report says that thou makest the blind to see, the lame to walk; that thou cleansest the lepers, and castest out unclean spirits and devils, and healest those who have laboured, under long diseases, and raisest up the dead. And having heard all this concerning thee, I have concluded with myself one of these two things; either that thou art God, and that, being come down from heaven, thou doest all these mighty works, or that thou art the Son of God, seeing thou art able to perform such things. Wherefore by this pre- sent letter I entreat thee to come unto me, and to cure me of the infir- mity that lies upon me. For I have also heard that the Jews murmur against thee, and seek to do thee mischief. For I have a small but faii^ city, which may be sufficient both for thee and me." The Answer of our Saviour to Abgarus. 10. " Abgarus, thou art blessed, in that though thou hast not seen me thou hast yet believed in me. For it is written concerning me that those who have seen me should not believe in me ; that so they who have not seen me might believe and live. As for what thou hast writ- ten unto me that I should come to thee, it is necessary that all those things for which I was sent should be fulfilled by me in this place, and that having fulfilled them I should be received up to him that sent me. When therefore I shall be received into heaven, I will send unto thee some one of my disciples, who shall both heal thy distemper, and give life to thee and to those that are with me." 11. Having said thus much concerning this pretended intercourse between our Saviour Christ and this prince, I should in the next place mention the letters ascribed to his mother, the blessed Virgin Mary, but that there is not the least shadow of truth to give credit to them, nor any arguments brought in favour of them that may deserve a refu- tation. I shall therefore say nothing to these, but pass on without any more ado to those pieces which have been attributed either to some particular apostle or evangehst, or else are pretended to have been composed by the whole college of the apostles together. 12. Of the former kind is the Epistle of St. Paul to the Laodiceans, set out by Hotter in his Polyglott New Testament, and inserted by Sixtus Senensis" into his Bibliotheque, together with the other epistles " Bibl. Sanct. lib. ii. in Paulo. Add. Frassenium Disq. Biblic. p. 731, &c a2 6 PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE. that are in like manner pretended, though without any just ground, to have passed betv?een the same apostle and Seneca the philosopher. Now that which gave occasion to the forging of such an epistle was, that St. Paul himself seems to speak (Coloss. iv. 16) as if he had writ- ten an epistle to that church. For having commanded the Colossians, when they should have read the epistle which he wrote to them, " to cause it to be read in the church of the Laodiceans," he adds, that " they likewise should read the epistle from Laodicea." But not to mention that St. Paul's words may be understood of an epistle written from Laodicea," (as Theophylact' thinks the First Epistle to Timothy, which, nevertheless, I suppose, was written after that to the Colossians,) or of an epistle written by the apostle to some other church, but ordered to be communicated to the Laodiceans, as the Second Epistle to the Corinthians was directed not only to that one place, but to all the churches of Achaia, (2 Cor. i. 4,) and as in the very passage under debate, the Epistle to the Colossians is ordered to be sent to the Laodi- ceans, and to be read in the church there ; — I say, not to insist upon these explications, there are reasons sufficient to induce one to believe that the Epistle to the Ephesians, as it now is, and was very early en- titled, was originally inscribed to the Laodiceans : this at least is sure, that it is so called by Marcion, who, though a rank heretic, and reproved by Tertullian as a falsifier of the title of an apostolical epistle," yet in a matter of this nature may be admitted to give his evidence, especially considering that he lived within threescore years after this epistle was written. 13. But to suppose that this epistle was primarily written to the Ephesians, yet this does not hinder but that St. Paul might have ordered it to be communicated, as to other churches, so in particular to that of Laodicea, and from thence to be sent on to the Colossians, which, as I have before observed, will sufficiently answer all that can be collected from the passage produced but of his epistle to them. Now that which favours this conjecture is, that Ephesus was in those days looked upon, even in the civil account of the empire, as the chief city and metropolis of the Lesser Asia. Here it was that the empe- rors* ordered their edicts relating to that province to be published, in like manner as we find in several' laws of the Theodosian code, that they were wont to be proposed at Rome for Italy, and at Carthage for Africa. Here the common councils of Africa assembled, and, to name no more, here^ the public sports and sacred rites, &c., that concerned the whole community of that province, were usually transacted. Hence » So Chrysostom and Theodorct. ' Theophylact. in loc. " Of this see Dr. Mill's Proleg. to his N. T. p. ix. '>■ Vid. Euseb. Eccles. Hist. lib. iv. e. 13, ' Vid. Annot \' lies, in Euseb. p. 60, A. /Vid. Obs. Menag. in Diog.'Laert. p. 23, b, ed. 4to. TREATISES FALSELY CALLED APOSTOLICAL. 7 St. Chrysostom" calls it, in express terms, " the metropolis of Asia ;" and in the order* of the metropolitan churches it is accordingly styled the first and most honourable of Asia. 14. And much greater was the respect which it had with relation to ecclesiastical matters, both as it was a church founded by St. Paul," and as it was the seat of the beloved disciple St. John, who continued there to the very time of Trajan, above one hundred years after Christ. Hence TertuUian* — directing those who were desirous to know what the true faith of Christ was, to inquire among the chiefest churches in every part what had been delivered to them, and was the faith received and taught amongst them — bids them, if they were in Italy, go to Rome ; if in Achaia, to Corinth ; if in Macedonia, to Philippi ; if in Asia, to Ephesus : insomuch that, as Evagrius' tells us, the bishop of Ephesus had a patriarchal power witliin the diocese of Asia till the time of the fourth general council. And, long after that, Theodorus, bishop of this see, subscribing to the acts of the sixth general council, calls himself bishop of Ephesus, the metropolis of the province of Asia. And, even in the times of which we are now discoursing, St. John, writing to the seven churches of Asia, (of which Laodicea was one,) places Ephesus' at the head of them, as that which had the precedence of all the rest in those parts. 15. Nor is it any small confirmation of this opinion, that, when St. Paul passed through Asia to Jerusalem, we read (Acts xx.) that, not having time to go himself to EphesuSj he ordered the elders of that church to meet him at Miletus, and there gave his last charge to them. Now who those elders were we are plainly told, (v. 28 ;) they were the bishops of that church. But it is certain that m those days there was but one bishop, properly so called, in a church at one time ; and therefore these could not be the bishops of that city alone,« but must have been rather the bishop of Ephesus, together with the bishops of the other neighbouring churches within that district; and it was pro- bably Timothy who now came at the head of them. And wha:t kind of a bishop he was, St. Paul's epistles will not suffer us to doubt: he was indeed a bishop over other bishops ; the first, to say no more, of all the bishops in those parts. 16. Seeing then such was the prerogative which the church of Ephe- sus had from the beginning over all the othfir churches of the Asian diocese, and that St. Paul himself had first planted Christianity there,— and seeing it appears, from liie command which he gave to the Colos- sians, (chap, iv, 16,) to cause the epistle which he had written to them to be read in the church of the Laodiceans, that'he was wont to order "Arg. in Epist. ad Ephes. 'Ad calcem Codini. 'Acts xviii. 19; xix. 1, 10. ■iTertull. dfi Praescript. cap. xxxvi. p. 215. 'Hist Eccles. Ub. in, c. 6,. p. 339. /Rev. i. 11 ; ii. 1. ^ IrenaBus, lib. iii. c 14. O PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE. the epistles which he wrote to one church to be sent to, and read in, the others that were near unto it, — seeing, lastly, we are told both by Tertullian" and Epiphanius, that the Epistle to the Ephesians was an- ciently called by some the epistle to the Laodiceans ; — I think it may not be improbable but that by the epistle from Laodicea he may have meant the epistle which he wrote to the Ephesians," at the same time and by the same person that he wrote to the Colossians, and which, being from them communicated to the Laodiceans, might be ordered by St. Paul to be sent on to the Colossians, who were a neighbour church to Laodicea, and afterwards subject to it as their metropolitan. 17. But whatever becomes of this conjecture — whether by the Epistle from Laodicea we are to understand some epistle written from that place, and that either by St. Paul to some other church or person, or by the Laodiceans" to him, or whether we are to understand by it some epistle that was to be communicated from thence to the Colos- sians, which seems to me the more probable, and particularly that which he wrote by Tychicus to the Ephesians at the same time that he wrote by him to the Colossians — certain it is that the epistle now extant under that title is none of St. Paul's writing ; but is made up of several parcels of his genuine epistles, and the expressions contained in them. 18. It would be endless to insist upon all the other spurious pieces of the like kind that have been attributed to this great apostle. It is sufficient to observe that neither Eusebius" nor St. Jerome' knew any thing more of his writing than what we have in those epistles that are still extant in our Bibles under his name, except it were the epistle to the Hebrews, which, though doubted of by some in the primitive church, is yet ascribed to him by Eusebius, who expressly accounts fourteen of his epistles, and speaks of that to the Hebrews as his ; though he adds that, " being not received by the Church of Rome, it was by some suspected whether it were indeed the true epistle of St. Paul." 19. But much greater is the authority of those supposititious pieces which the same Eusebius-f tells us were, even in those days, attributed to that other great apostle St. Peter, namely the acts, the gospel, the preaching, and the revelation of St. Peter. Nevertheless, seeing he at the same time declares that they were not catholic, nor universally received, and since from other ecclesiastical writers it may be proved that some of them were wholly composed, and others interpolated by "TertuU.adv.Marcion. lib. v. c. xvii.p.481. Epiphan. Hares. xlii. num. xii. »Vid. I'Histoire Critique de Monsieur Simon sur le N. T. t. xv. p. 166. See Dr. Mill's Pro- legom. ad N. T. p. ix. "Frassenius, Disq. BibUc. pp. 730, 731. ''Euseb. Hist. Eccles. lib. iii. c. 3. "Hieron. de Script. Eccles. in S. Paulo. /Euseb. Hist. Eccles. lib. iii. t. 3, et 35. Comp. Hieron. in Catal. Script. Eccles. in S. Petro. TREATISES FALSELY CALLED APOSTOLICAL. 9 heretics, the better to gain thereby credit to their doctrine, how ancient soever they may otherwise be, yet they will not fall within the com- pass of the present collection : nor indeed is there any thing of them remaining to us, except the names, and a few fragments, scattered up and down in the quotations that have been made by the ecclesiastical writers out of them. 20. To these let me add, in the third place, the discourses ascribed to St. Matthew," the first of the evangelists. Two books are still re- maining under his name — a liturgy, pretended to have been composed by him, and a discourse concerning the nativity of the Blessed Virgin ; but both rejected by learned men as the works of some impostor many ages after the death of that holy apostle. As for the liturgies ascribed in like manner to some others of the aposdes, namely, to St. Peter, St. Msfrk, and St. James, there is not I suppose any learned man at this day who believes them to have been written by those holy men, and set forth in the manner that they are now pubHshed. They were indeed the ancient liturgies of the three, if not of the four, patriarchal churches, viz., the Roman, (perhaps of that of Antioch too,) the Alex- andrian, and Jerusalem churches, first founded, or at least governed, by St. Peter, St. Mark, and St. James. However, since it can hardly be doubted but that those holy apostles and evangelists did give some directions for the administration of the blessed eucharist in those churches, it may reasonably be presumed that some of those orders are still remaining in those liturgies which have been brought down to us under their names ; and that those prayers wherein they all agree (in sense at least, if not in words) were first prescribed in the same, or like terms, by those apostles and evangelists ; nor would it be difficult to make a farther proof of this conjecture from the writings of the ancient fathers, if it were needful in this, place to insist upon it. 21. For what concerns the gospels set out under the names of several of the apostles, though some of them are very ancient, yet is it ge- nerally agreed among the most judicious of all sides that they were not only not written by those holy persons, but were for the most part set out by suspected authors, and for ill ends, after their deaths; 22. As for the writings of the whole college of apostles, two pieces there are, besides the synodical letter spoken of by St. Luke, (Acts XV. 23,) which not only go under their names, but have been by some ascribed to them as the authors of them ; and those are, first, the Creed, and secondly, the canons of the apostles. 23. For the former of these, the appstles' creed, it has been thought by many that it was so called, not only as being a summary of the "Vid. Cav. Hist. Literar. p. 9. Natal. Alex. sec. i. vol. i. p. 65. Du Pin Bibl. vol. i. p. 21. 2 10 PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE. apostles' doctrine, but because it was really composed by them ; and that either in their first assembly after our Lord's resurrection, (Acts i.,) or else immediately before their dispersion, upon the breaking out of Herod's persecution, (Acts xii.,) which Baronius and others esteem the more probable. It is not my intention to enter on any particular ex- amination of this matter, which has been so fully handled, not only by the late critics of the church of Rome, Natalis Alexander," Du Pin," &c., but yet more especially by Archbishop Usher," Gerard Vossius," Suicer,' Spanhemius,-'' Tentzelius,s and Samuel Basnage," among the Protestants. It shall suffice to say that, as it is not likely that had any such thing as this been done by the apostles, St. Luke would have passed it by without taking the least notice of it, so the diversity of creeds in the ancient church, and that not only in expression but in some whole articles too, sufficiently shows that the creed which we call by that name was not composed by the twelve apostles, much less in the same form in which it now is, although' the articles of it may for the most part have been delivered by the apostles to their first con- verts, much in the same order that they now stand, and have been by them confessed at their baptism, and on other occasions. 24. But much less is it probable that the canons yet extant under their name were truly compiled by them, but rather, as our late pious and learned bishop Beveridge* has shown, were a collection of the canons made by tlie councils of the first ages, put together at several times, and finished, as we now see them, within 300 years after Christ, before the assembling of the first general council of Nice. This is the earliest date that is at present ascribed to them by the most judicious' writers of the Roman communion, as well as of the reformed religion ; and some" there are who will by no means allow them to be so ancient as even this opinion supposes them to be. 25. It is evident, then, that except the Holy Scriptures there is nothing remaining of the truly genuine Christian antiquity more early than those pieces I have here put together. Nor have the authors whose tracts I have now set forth any other pieces yet remaining be- sides those that appear in the following collection. Indeed, for what concerns two of the fathers here mentioned, St. Clement and St. Igna- "Nat. Alex. sec. i. vol. i. p. 490, &c. 'Du Pin Biblioth. Eccles. vol. i. p. 25, &c. = Diatrib. de Symb. '' Voss. Dissert, de tribus Sy mbolis. ' Suicer. Thesaur. Bccles. torn. ii. Voce tnififfoXov, p. 1086, &c. /Spanhem. Introd. ad Hist. Eccles. sec. ii. c. .3. s Ernest. Tentzel. Exercit. select. Exercit. i. '' Sam. Basnage, Exercit. Hist. Crit. ad ann. xliv. num. 17, 18, "See Dr. Grabe's Annot. to Bishop Bull's Judic. Oath. Eccles. cap. 6. 'Annot. in Pfindect. Canon. Oxon. torn. ii. p. 1. Id. Codex. Cant. Vindicat. c. 11, &c. 'Vid. Albaspin. obs. lib. 1, c. 13, p. 28. De Marca apud Bevereg. Annot. in Pandect, p. 4, num. xii. Coteler. Not. in Patr. Apostol. pp. 327, 328. Du Pin, Bibl. Eccles. tom. i. p. 36. Natal. Alex. sec. i. vol. ii. p. 138. "■Daill^ de Pseudep. Apostol. lib. iii. Larroque Observat, in Bevereg. Hoornbcck Theolog. Patr. p. 3.'i, &c. TREATISES FALSELY CALLED APOSTOLICAL. 11 tius, several treatises there are, and some that may seem much more considerable than any I have subjoined, that have been sent abroad under the authority of their names, but which are at present universally acknowledged by all learned men not to have been written by them. Such are the Constitutions and Recognitions of St. Clement, the col- lection called from the same father the Clementines, the Epitome of Clement, and the other epistles ascribed to Ignatius, besides the seven here set out, which alone were either mentioned by Eusebius, or known to the church for some ages sifter." 26. ' I shall not here enter upon any particular inquiry when th^se several pieces were first sent abroad into the world, or how it came to pass that some, even among the ancients' themselves, received several of theni for the genuine writings of these holy men, only corrupted, as many others were, by the heretics of those first times, the better to give some colour to their errors. I will only observe that the Recog- nitions of St. Clement — not only the most learned but the most ancient too of any of these, as near as we can guess — were not set forth till about the middle of the second century, and are rejected by Eusebius" as none of his, but as one of those many impostures which M'ere even then pubUshed under his name. And for the rest, though some of ihem have been reputed ancient too, yet it is evident that none of them come up to the period of which I am now speaking, nor even to the age of the Recognitions before mentioned.'' 27. As for the Epitome of St. Clement, Cotelerius" esteems it to have been yet later than any of the rest. Perhaps it was collected by Metaphrastes, whom I take to have been the author of the martyrdom of that holy man, set out by Surius-'' and Allatius,^ and reprinted by Cotelerius at the end of the works ascribed to St. Clement. This is 'certain, that it was composed in some -of the latter ages, as was also the account of the miracle pretended to be wrought at his martyrdom, which goes under the name of Ephraem, archbishop of Cherson ; where (if Du Pin" be not mistaken) there never was any. And this Cotelerius seems to have been aware of ; and therefore in his annotations upon this relation, calls him archbishop, or bishop, of Cherson. Now that there was such a bishop appears both from the ancient Notitiae' of the • See this discussed at large by Archbishop Usher, Dissert, ad Ignat. cap. v. vi. xix. p. 2. ' Bpiphan. Hffires. xxx. Ruffinus de Adulterat. lib. Origen. Tract, xxxv. in Matthieum. Author Oper. Imperfect, in Matth. inter Oper. Chrysost. ad Mat. x. et xxiv. « Vid. Coteler. Not. in Script. PP. Apost. p. 343. Natal. Alex. sec. i. A. torn. i. p. 126. Du Pin. Bibl. vol. i. pp. 80, 81. i* Coteler. Annot. in Script. PP. Apost. p. 113. A. 115. D. 403, 431, C. D. Sixt. Senens. Biblioth. lib. ii. in Clement. Possevin. Apparat. p. 328. Bellarm. de Script, sec. i. in Clement. Natal. Alex, sec.i. torn. i. p. 129. Id. ibid. cap. de St. Ignat. p. 139. Du Pin Biblioth. pp. 81, 83, 102, &c. 'Not* in Script. PP. Apost. p. 431, C. D. /Sarins ad Nov. 23. e AUatius in Diatrib. de Symeonum Scriptis. »Du Pin Biblioth. torn. i. p. 89, r. >Vide Geogr. Sacr. a. S. Paulo, pp. 11,43. 12 PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE. province of Europe under the patriarch of Constantinople, and from the subscription which Peter," bishop of this place, made to the coun- cil of Chalcedon for Cyriacus, archbishop of Heraclea, in whose pro- vince that see lay. And the Disposition of Leo the Sixth," made towards the latter end of the ninth centurj-^, mentions it among the archbishoprics subject to the patriarch of Constantinople ; to which degree therefore, about that time, or not long before, it seems to have been raised. 28. There is nothing then in any of those pieces which make up the rest of Cotelerius's collection, (and are indeed all that still remain under the names of those fathers of which we are now speaking,) that can with any good grounds be relied upon as the genuine products of those holy men. Let us see, in the last place, whether any of those discourses which have been sent abroad under the names of some others of the apostolical fathers may deserve to be received by us as coming truly from them. 29. And here I shall, in the first place, take it. for granted that what those who are usually the most fond of such spurious pieces (I mean the writers of the church of Rome) have yet almost unanimously re- jected as false and counterfeit, may securely be laid aside by us, without any farther inquiry into the condition of them. Such are the History of the Life, Miracles, and Assumption of St. John, pretended to have been written by Prochorus his disciple, and one of the seven deacons chosen by the church of Jerusalem, (Acts vi.,) — the Histories of St. Peter and St. Paul, said to have been written by Linus, one of the first bishops of Rome, — the Lives of the Apostles, ascribed to Abdias, bishop of Babylon, and supposed to have been written by him in the Hebrew tongue, — the Epistles of St. Martial, who is said _ to have been one of the seventy disciples appointed by our Saviour, and one of the first preachers of the gospel in France. These are all so evidently spurious that even Natalis Alexander" himself was ashamed to undertake the defence of them ; and not only he, but all the other writers of the same church, Baronius, Bellarmine, Sixtus Senensis, Possevine, Espenceeus, Bisciola, Labbe, &c., have freely acknow- ledged the little credit that is to be given to them. 30. But two pieces there are which Alexander is still unwilling to part witfi, though he cannot deny but that the most 'learned men even of his own communion have at last agreed in the rejecting of them, and those are the Passion of St. Andrew, written (as is pretended) by the presbyters of Achaia, and the works set out under the name of Dionysius the Areopagite. " Geogr. Sacr. p. 233, in Chersonense. - ' Vide Jus Grseco-Rom. Francofort. arjio 1596, part i. p. 88. 'Eccles. Hist, sec. i. torn. i. pp. 95, 115. TREATISES FALSELY CALLED APOSTOLICAL. 13 31. As for the former of these, I confess there have not been want- ing many, from the eighth century downwards, who have undertaken the defence of it. Etherius" mentioned it about the year 788 ; Re- migius, after ; Peter Damian, Lanfranc, and St. Bernard, still later ; and, in this last age, Baronius, Bellarmine, Labbe, and a few others, have yet more endeavoured to establish its authority. "But then," as Du Pin' well obsen^es, " we, do not find the ancients knew of any Acts of St. Andrew in particular ; nor are the Acts we now have quoted by any before the time of Etherius before mentioned ; and yet, how they could have escaped the search of the primitive fathers, had they been extant in their days, it is hard to imagine." 32. But much less is the credit that ought to be given to the pre- tended works of Dionysius the Areopagite ; which, as Alexander" con- fesses two very great critics" of his own communion to have denied to have been written by that holy man, so has a third" very lately given such reasons, to show that the writings now extant under his name could not have been composed by him, as ought to satisfy every con- sidering person of their imposture. For, not to say any thing of what occurs everywhere in those discourses utterly disagreeable to the state of the church in the time that Dionysius lived, can it be imagined that, if such considerable books as these had been written by him, none of the ancients of the first four centuries should have heard any thing of them ? Or shall we say that they did know of them as well as the fathers that lived after, and yet made no mention of them, though they had so often occasion to have done it, as Eusebius and St. Jerome, not to name any others, had ? 33. In short, one of the first times that we hear of them is in the dispute between the Severians and Catholics about the year 532, when the former produced them in favour of their errors, and the latter rejected them as books utterly unknown to all antiquity, and therefore not worthy to be received by them. 34. It is therefore much to be wondered that, after so many argu- ments as have been brought to prove how little right these treatises have to such a primitive tentiquity, nevertheless, not only Natalis Alex- ander, but a man of much better judgment, I mean Emanuel Schel- strat,-*" the learned keeper of the Vatican library, should still undertake the defence of them. When they were written, or by what author, is very uncertain ; but, as Bishop Pearson^ supposes them to have been first set forth about the latter end of Eusebius's life, so Dr. Cave" con- »Vid. Natal. Alex. sec. i. torn. i. p. 109. Labbe de Script. Eccles. torn. i. p. 3, &c. 'Nouvelle Biblioth. torn. i. pp. 47, 48. 'Natal. Alex. sec. i. vol. i. p. 136. Labbe de Script, lorn. i. in Dionysio. '' He might have added several others : see Bellaim. de Script, p. 56. 'Du Pin Nouvelle Biblioth. torn. i. p. 90. /Vide Cave Hist. Lit. sec. iv. p. 177. e Vindic. Ignat. part i. c. 10. * Loc. supr. cit. B 14 PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE. jectures that the elder ApoUinarius may very probably have been the author of them. Others" there are who place them yet later, and sus- pect Pope Gregory the Great to have had a hand in the forgery. And indeed the arguments which our very learned Mr. Dodwell" brings, to prove that they were originally written by one of the Roman church, are not without their just weight. But whatever becomes of this, thus much is certain, that these books were not written before the middle of the fourth century, and therefore are without the compass of the pre- sent undertaking. 35. And now, having taken such a view as was necessary for the present design of all those other pieces which have been obtruded upon the world for apostolical writings, besides what is either here col- lected, or has been before pubhshed in the sacred books of the New. Testament, — I suppose I may with good grounds conclude that the little I have now put together is all that can with any certainty be de- pended upon of the most primitive fathers ; and therefore that from these, next to the Holy Scriptures, we must be content to draw the best account we can of the doctrine and discipline of the church, for the first hundred years after the death of Christ. CHAPTER HI. OF THE AUTHORITY OF THE FOLLOWING TREATISES, AND THE DEFER- ENCE THAT OUGHT TO BE PAID TO THEM UPON THE ACCOUNT OF IT. This is shown from the following considerations : — 1 . That the autliors of them were contemporary with the apostles, and instructed hy them. — 2. They were men of an eminent character in the Church ; and therefore, to be sure, such as could not be igno- rant of what was taught in it. — 3. They were very careful to preserve the doctrine of Christ in its purity, and to oppose such as went about to corrupt it — 4. They were men not only of a perfect piety, but of great courage and constancy ; and therefore such as cannot be suspected to have had any design to prevaricate in this matter. 5. They were endued with a large portion of the Holy Spirit, and as such could hardly err in what they delivered as a necessary part of the Gospel of Christ — And, 6. Their writings were approved by the Church in those days, which could not be mistaken in its approbation of them. 1. But, secondly, and to proceed yet farther: the following collec- tion pretends to a just esteem, not only upon the account of its perfec- tion, as it is an entire collection of what remains to us of the apostohcal fathers, but yet much more from the respect that is due to the authors themselves whose writings are here put together. ' Daille apud Pearson, loc. supr. cit ' Dodwell de Sacerdot Laicor. cap. viii. sec. iii. p. 389. AUTHORITY OF THE FOLLOWING TREATISES. 15 2. If, first, we consider them as the contemporaries of the iioly apos- tles, some of them bred up under our Saviour Christ himself, and the rest instructed by those great men whom he commissioned to go fortli and preach to all the world," and endued with an extraordinary assist- ance of his blessed Spirit for the doing of it," we cannot doubt but that what they deliver to us must be, without controversy, the pure doc- trine of the gospel — what Christ and his apostles taught, and what they had themselves received from their own moutlis. This is the least deference we can pay to the authors here set forth, — to look upon them as faithful deliverers of the doctrine and practice of the church in those most early times, when heresies were not as yet so openly broke out in it, nor the true faith so dangerously corrupted with the mixture of those erroneous opinions which afterwards more fatally in- fected the minds of men, and divided the church into so many opposite parties and factions. So that here, then, we may read with security, and let me add, with respect too, and not doubt but that what these holy men deliver to us, in all the fundamental articles of it, is as cer- tainly the true doctrine of Christ as if we had received it, like them, from our Saviour and his apostles. 3. But, secondly, the authors of the following pieces had not only the advantage of living in the apostolical times, of hearing the holy apostles and conversing with them, but were most of them persons of a very eminent character in the church too — men raised up to the high- est pitch of dignity and authority in some of the most famous churches of the world, chosen by the apostles to preside in their own proper sees, at Rome, at Antioch, at Smyrna — one of them set apart by the express command of the Holy Ghost to be the companion of St. Paul in his work of the ministry, and the rest for the most part commended for their raYe endowments, in the inspired writings of the Holy Scrip- tures delivered to us ; and therefore we may be sure that such men as these must needs have been very, carefully instructed in the mystery of the gospel, and have had a most perfect knowledge of the faith as it is in Jesus. 4. Had they been some ordinary and obscure writers, even of the apostolical times, men of no note, no authority in the church — though still, whilst we had a good account of their integrity, the very advan- tage of the age wherein they lived would have rendered their dis- courses justly venerable to us, yet should we not perhaps have been obliged to pay such a deference to their writings as not to make al- lowance for some lesser defects or mistakes that might have happened to them. But, having to do with men not only instructed in common by the apostles with the other Christians of those days, but particularly "Matt, xxviii. 19. Maikxvi. 15. ' Luke xxiv. 49. Acts i. 8. Acts ii. 16 PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE. bred up and instituted by them for the work of the ministry, — having here the writings of men who had attained to such a perfect knowledge in the mystery of godliness, and were judged to have been so well grounded and settled in it as to deserve to be raised up by the apostles themselves to the government of such eminent churches as those over Avhich these holy men were overseers, — it is plain we cannot, with any reason, doubt of what they deliver to us as the gospel of Christ, but ought to receive it, if not with equal veneration, yet but with a little less respect than we do the sacred writings of those who were their masters and instructors. 5. Yet farther, thirdly, the following authors were not only such eminent men, and bred up under such mighty advantages, and so weU instructed in the knowledge of the gospel, as I have now ob- served, but they were, moreover, persons of a consummated piety, adorned with all those Christian virtues they so affectionately recom- mend to us ; but especially they were zealous watchmen over their churches, careful to instruct them in the true faith and doctrine of Christ, and no less careful to preserve them against the contagion of those heresies which even in their days began to corrupt the purity of it. Hence we read with what a holy zeal that blessed martyr Ignatius, first, and then his fellow-disciple St. Polycarp, set themselves against those who would instil some other doctrines into the minds of their people than what the apostles had delivered unto them, what wise directions they gave them for the discovery of such false teachers," and how earnestly they exhorted them, by keeping firm to their respective bishops and presbyters, and to the apostolical doctrine delivered by them, to prevent their gaining any advantage against them. 6. With what assurance do they deliver the doctrine which they had received ! How confidently do they declare it to \fe the true doctrine of Christ, and exhort the churches to whom they write not to give any heed to such as would insinuate any other doctrine into their minds ! And how did they themselves show them, by their own ex- amples, how they should avoid such persons ! Insomuch that Irenseus' tells us that, if St. Polycarp at any time chanced to hear any one de- liver any other doctrine than what he had been taught, he did not only not give any countenance to such an one, but was wont to stop his ears at him, and cried out Avith astonishment and grief, " Good God ! to what times hast thou reserved me, that I shall endure this !" Nay, he would not tarry in the same place with such a person, but would leave the house if he knew that any heretics were in it. 7. But of the care which these holy men had to keep close in every » Euseb. Hist. Eccles. lib. iii. c. 35. ' Epist. ad Florinum, apud Euseb. Hist. Eccles. lib. V. c. 20. AUTHORITY OF THE FOLLOWING TREATISES. 17 the least circumstance to the doctrine and practice of the apostles, we cannot, I think, desire a fairer instance to convince us, than what Eusebius" has recorded of the same blessed martyr ; how that, hear- ing of the difference between the eastern and western churches about the time of keeping Easter, he thought it worthy his pains, at an ex- treme old age, to take a journey as far as Rome for the composing of it. And notwithstanding all that Anicetus, who was then bishop of that church, could say to move him from his practice, yet having this ground for it, that St. John was wont to keep Easter as he did, the good man held close to it, and would not hear of changing a custom which that blessed apostle had delivered to him. 8. And when such was the care which these holy writers had of holding fast, even to the least particular, of what they received from the apostles, that they would not comply with the rest of the church in such an indifferent matter, only because by so doing they should depart from the practice of one of them, surely we may with confi- dence depend upon the doctrine which they deliver, as most pure and genuine — what our Saviour taught his apostles, and his apostles them. And what Irenaeus once said of his master Polycarp, we may with equal truth and assurance apply to aU the rest of those fathers whose treatises I have here put together: " that they taught evermore what they had received from the apostles, which also they delivered to the church, and which only is the true doctrine of Christ.'" 9. To this general piety of their lives, and care for the truth and purity of their religion, let -me add, fourthly, their courage and con- stancy in the maintaining of it. How great this was I have already shown, in the particular accounts which I have given of the several fathers whose writings are here subjoined.* It shall suffice in this place to observe that the most of them, after having spent their lives in a careful administration of the great charges to which they were called, were at last made perfect by martyrdom, and underwent the most exquisite cruelties with a courage and constancy worthy both of the rehgion they professed, and of the eminent characters which they had obtained in the church. 10. Now though this does not immediately argue the purity of their doctrine, yet being added to what I have before observed, it will give us a new ground to rely upon the truth of what they deliver. For since we cannot reasonably doubt but that such persons as these must needs have known what tiie doctrine of the apostles was, and have been perfectly instructed in that religion which they were esteemed able and worthy to preach to others, we have 'in this a clear demon- " Buseb. Hist. Eccles. lib. v. c. 26. 'Iren. adv. Hieres. lib. iii. c. 3. * See the preliminary discourses prefixed to the several Epistles, 3 b2 18 PRELIMINAEY DISCOURSE. stration of their integrity, both in their teaching and writing of it, and must conclude that they who lived such excellent lives, and took so much pains in the ministry of the gospel — ^who stuck with such firm- ness to it, notwithstanding all the endeavours of their enemies to the contrary, and chose rather to undergo the most bitter deaths than they would in any wise depart from it, — have doubtless dealt most up- rightly in this matter, and delivered nothing to us but what they took for the true doctrine of Christ, and what therefore we may conclude undoubtedly was so. 11. Such good reason have we, upon all these accounts, to look upon the writings of these holy men as containing the pure and un- corrupted doctrine of our blessed Saviour and his apostles. But now, fifthly, and to advance yet higher, these writers were not only thus qualified by these ordinary means to deliver the gospel of Christ to us, but in all probability were endued with the extraordinary assistance of the Holy Spirit too ; so that what they teach us is not to be looked upon as a mere traditionary relation of what had been delivered to them, but rather as an authoritative declaration of the gospel of Christ to us, though indeed as much inferior to that of the apostles and evangelists as both their gifts and their commission were inferior to theirs. 12. For, first, that the extraordinary gifts of the Holy Spirit jwith which the apostles were endued — and which the holy scriptures" them- selves tell us were in those days distributed to other believers as well as unto them — continued still in the church after their departure, we have the express testimony of Justin Martyr," one of the most ancient writers, after those I have here subjoined, to assure us. They were communicated not only to men but women." And, that we may be sure he spake nothing in this matter but what he could undeniably have made out, we find him boasting of it against Trypho the Jew, and urging it as an unanswerable argument in behalf of Christianity, and against the Jews, from whom these gifts had a long time been de- parted. And, even in the fathers whose writings are here put together, there appear suflicient indications of the continuance of these extraor- dinary powers. 13. This St. Clemenf manifestly declares, in his first epistle to the Corinthians: he tells us that some in that church not only had such" gifts, but were even proud and conceited upon the account of them. " Let a man," says he, "have faith,"" (i. e. such a faith by which he is able to work miracles ;) " let him be powerful to utter mystical know- ledge," (for to that his expression manifestly refers ;) "let him be wise "See 1 Cor. iv. 12. Ephes. i. 6, &c. Acts viii. 14, 17; xix.6, &c. 'Vid.Euseb. Hist Eccles. lib. iv. c. 15. Just. Mart. Dial, cum Tryph. p. 308. ' Ibid. p. 315. <* See below, c. xlviii. ' Clem. Alex. Strom, lib. vi. Hist. Eccles. lib. ii. c. i. p. 30. AUTHORITY OF THE FOLLOWING TREATISES. 19 in discerning of speeches," (another gift common in those times:) " still," says he, " by how much the more he seems to excel others," viz., upon the account of these extraordinary endowments, "by so much tlie more will it behove him to be humble-minded, and to seek what is profitable to all men, and not to his own advantage." And St. Ignatius" not only supposes that such gifts might be in others, but plainly intimates that he himself was endued with a large portion of them. 14. Which being so, we cannot doubt, secondly, but that, as it was most reasonable, both the apostles were careful to set those in the chiefest places of honour and authority in their several churches who were the most eminent for those gifts, and that God was also pleased to grant to such persons a more than ordinary portion of the Holy Spirit, for the~> better discharge of those eminent places to which they were called. 15. Concerning the former of these, we are told by St. Paul, (Acts vi.,) that when the apostles thought it necessary to establish a new order of ministers in the church, that might take care of those things which they who were of a higher rank could not find leisure to attend to, though their ministry were of the lowest order, and which required much less capacities in those who were to discharge it than theirs whose business it was to govern and instruct the church of Christ, yet they particularly laid it down to the brethren, as one of the qualifica- tions that was to be required in those whom they chose for that pur- pose, that they should be " men well approved of and full of the Holy Spirit, and of wisdom," v. 3. And of one of them, viz., St. Stephen, it is particularly observed, (v. 8,) that he was " full of faith and power, and did signs and great wonders among the people." And when the Jews disputed against him, we read (v. 10) that they were not able to stand against the wisdom and spirit by which he spake." 16. Now, if such was the care which they took in the choice of those who were to be admitted into the lowest ministry of the church, we cannot doubt but that they were certainly much more careful not to admit any into the highest rank 'of honour and authority in it but what were, in a yet more eminent manner, endued with the same gifts. Hence St. Clement tells us that " the apostles did prove by the Spirit the first fruits of their conversions, and out of them set bishops and pastors over such as should beUevCi"" By which we must understand one of these two things, (and very probably they were both meant by it,) either that the apostles made use of their own extraordinary gift of the Spirit (one use of which was to discern and try the spirits of others^) in choosing persons fitly qualified for the work of the ministry, or else " See the Salutation to the Smyrnffians. ' Epist. to the Philadelphians, sec. vii. To the Trallians, sec. v. ' Clem. Epist. num. xlii. xliv. ^ 1 Cor. xii. 10. Heb. iv. 13. 20 PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE. that, by the extraordinary gifts of those whom they pitched upon, they perceived that they were worthy of such an employ, and therefore chose them out for it. And the other Clement yet more plainly speaks the same thing: that "St. John, being returned from his banishment in Patmos, went about the country near unto Ephesus, both to form and settle churches, where he saw occasion, and to admit into the order of the clergy such as were marked out to him by the Spirit."" 17. And then for the other thing observed : it is clear that the very imposition of hands did, in those days, confer the Holy Spirit in an extraordinary manner upon those who were ordained to the ministry of the Gospel. This St. Paul intimates to Timothy, where he exhorts him to stir up to ^d^ia-f^a, the gift, (i. e. the extraordinary power of the Holy Spirit,) "which," says he, "is in thee by the imposition of my hands," 2 Tim. i. 6. And, would you know how this ceremony of setting him apart for such a service came to endue him with such an extraordinary power, the same apostle will tell you (1 Tim. iv. 14) that it was given unto him by prophecy, with, or through, the imposition of hands upon him ; that is to say, God — who, by his prophets, had before designed and marked him out for that great office, (1 Tim. i. 18) — upon the actual admission of him into it by the outward rite of lay- ing on of hands, and upon the solemn prayers that were then withal made for him, did bestow the gifts of his blessed Spirit in an extraor- dinary manner upon him. 18. Now, as this will give us a good ground to conclude that those holy men, whose writings we have here collected, were endued with a very large portion of the extraordinary gifts of the Holy Ghost, whe- ther we consider the frequency of those endowments in the age in which they lived, or the extraordinary strictness and piety of their lives, or the greatness of those stations to which they were called in the church, or, lastly, the judgment which the apostles, who called them to those high offices, were by the Spirit enabled to make of them ; — so, thirdly, if we look to those accounts which still remain to us of them, they will plainly show us that they were endued, and that in a very eminent manner, with this power and gift of the blessed Spirit. 19. Of Barnabas, the holy scripture itself bears witness, that " he was a good man, full of the Holy Ghost, and of faith." (Acts xi. 24.) Hermas is another of whom St. Paul himself makes mention (Rom. xvi. 14) as an early convert to Christianity. And what extraordinary revelations he had, and how he foretold the troubles that were to come upon the church, his following visions sufficiently declare. 20. Clement is not only spoken of by the same apostle, but with this advantageous character too, that he was the fellow-labourer of that « Clem. Alex, de Divit. Salv. num. xlii. Euseb. Hist. Eccles. lib. iii. c. 33. AUTHOEITY OF THE FOLLOWING TREATISES. 21 great man, and had Ms name written in the hook of life. (Phil. iv. 3.) And, when we shall consider to how much inferior and worse men these gifts were usually communicated at that time, we can hardly think that so excellent a man, and the companion of so great an apostle, em- ployed first in the planting of the gospel with him, and then sent to govern one of the most Considerable churches in the world, should have been destitute of it. 21. As for St. Ignatius, I have before observed that he had this gift ; and, by the help of it, warned the Philadelphians' against falling into those divisions which he foresaw were about to rise up amongst them. 22. Polycarp not only prophesied of his own death, but spake often- times of things that were to come ;" and has this witness from the whole church of Smyrna, that nothing of all that he foretold ever failed of coming to pass according to his prediction. 23. It remains, then, that the holy men whose writings are here subjoined were not only instructed by such as were inspired, but were themselves, in some measure, inspired too ; at least were endued with the extraordinary gifts of tlie Holy Ghost, for the better fulfilling of those great offices to which God had called them in his church. And therefore we must conclude that they were not only not mistaken in what they deliver to us as the gospel of Christ, but in all the neces- sary parts of it were so assisted by the Holy Ghost as hardly to have been capable of being mistaken in it ; by consequence that we ought to look upon their writings," though not of equal authority with those which we call, in a singular manner, the holy scriptures, (because neither were the authors of them called in so extraordinary a way to the writing of them, nor endued with so eminent a portion of the gifts of the blessed Spirit for the doing of it ; nor have their writings been judged by the common consent of the church in those first ages of it, when they were so much better qualified than we are now to judge of the divine authority of these kind of writings, to be of equal dignity with those of the apostles and evangelists ;) yet worthy of a much greater respect than any composures that have been made since ; how- ever men may seem to have afterwards written with more art, and to have shown a much greater stock of human learning than what is to be found, not only in the following pieces, but even in the sacred books of the New Testament itself. 24. I shall add but one consideration more, the better to show the true deference that ought to be paid to the treatises here collected; and that is, sixthly, that they were not only written by such men as I »Epist. to the Philadelphians, c. vii. Add The Martyrdom of Ignatius, num. xii. » Euseb. Hist. Bccles. Ub. v. u. xx. p. 1 53, a. ' Vid. Dodwell. Dissert, in Iren. Praefat. et Dissert. 2. Bt Irenseum apud Euseb. Hist. Eccles. loc. cit. p. 153. 22 PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE. have said — instructed by the apostles, and judged worthy by them, both for their knowledge and their integrity, to govern some of the most eminent churches in the world, and, lastly, endued with the extraordinary gift of the Holy Ghost, and upon all these accounts to be much respected by us — but were moreover received by the church, in those first ages, as pieces that contained nothing but what was agreeable to sound doctrine, which could scarcely be mistaken in its judgment of them. 25. The epistle of St. Clement was a long time read publicly with the other scriptures in the congregations of the faithful, made a part of their Bible, and was numbered among the sacred writings, how- ever finally separated from them. And not only the apostolical canons, but our most ancient Alexandrian manuscript, gives the same place to the second that it does to the first of them ; and Epiphanius, after both, tells us that they were both of them wont to be read in the church in his time." 26. The epistle of St. Polycarp, with that of the church of Smyrna, were not only very highly approved of by particular persons, but, like those of St. Clement, were read publicly too in the assemblies of the faithful. And for those of Ignatius, besides that we find a mighty value put upon them by the Christians of those times, they are sealed to us by this character of St. Polycarp : " that they are such epistles by which we may be greatly profited, for (says he) they treat of faith and patience, and of all things that pertain to edification in the Lord." 27. The epistle of Barnabas is not only quoted with great honour by those of the next age to him, but in the ancient stichometry of Cotelerius," we find it placed the very next to the epistle of St. Jude, and no diflTerence put between the authority of the one and the other. 28. And for the book of Hermas, both Eusebius and St. Jerome tell us that it was also wont to be read in the churches. In the same stichometry before mentioned, it is placed in the very next rank to the Acts of the Apostles ; and, in some of the most ancient manuscripts of the New Testament, we find it written in the same volume with the books of the apostles and evangelists, as if it had been esteemed of the same value and authority with them. 29. So that now, then, we must either say that the church in those days were so little careful of what was taught in it as to allow such books to be publicly read in its congregations, the doctrine whereof it did not approve, or we must confess that the following pieces are de- livered to us, not only by the learned men of the first ages of the church, but by the whole body of the faithful, as containing the pure "Epiphan. Uteres, xxx. num. 15. ' Annot. in Barnab. pp. 9, 10. SUBJECT OF THE FOLLOWING DISCOURSES. 23 doctrine of Christ, and must be looked upon to have nothing in them but what was then thought worthy of all acceptation. 30. Now how much this adds to the authority of these discourses, may easily be concluded from what I have before observed. For since it is certain that, in those times, the extraordinary gifts of the Holy Ghost were bestowed, not only upon the bishops and pastors of the church, (though upon them in a more eminent degree,) but also upon a great many of the common Christians too — since one particular design of these gifis was for the discerning of prophecies, to judge of what was proposed by any to the church, or written for the use and benefit of it — we cannot doubt but that what was universally approved of and allowed, not by a few learned men, but by the whole church in those days, — what was permitted to be read to the faithful, for their comfort and instruction, — must by this means have received the high- est human approbation, and ought to be looked upon by us, though not of equal authority with those books which the same church has delivered to us as strictly canonical, yet as standing in the first rank of ecclesiasticEil writings, and containing the true and pure doctrine of Christ in all things necessary to our salvation, without the mixture of any of those errors which have since been so unhappily brought into the church, and have been worthily censured as dangerous to, if not destructive of it. CHAPTER IV. OF THE SUBJECT OF THE FOLLOWING DISCOURSES, AND Oi" THE USE THAT IS TO BE MADE OF THEM. That, in the following Treatises, there is delivered to us a good account both of the Doc- trine and Discipline of the Chwrch in the Apostolical times — This shown in several Particulars — What they taught concerning God the Father, our Saviour Christ, and the Holy Ghost — Of Angels and Spirits — Of the rest of the Articles of the Apostles' Creed — Concerning the two Sacraments of Baptism and the Lord^s Supper — Of the Holy Scriptures, and the Divine Authority of them — What we meet with in these Treatises concerning the Government of the Church — Of the necessity of communi- cating Vfith the Bishops and Pastors of it — Of Schismatics, Heretics, and Apostates — Of their pubUc assembling for the Service of God, and what was done by them in those Meetings — Of several other instances of their Discipline, particularly of their Fasting and Confession of Sins — Of the care which their Bishops had of the whole Church — Of the respect that was paid to them — Of their Martyrs, and the veneration which they thought due to them — Of their practical Instructions, and how severe theh Mo- rality was, shown in several particulars — That, upon the whole, we may here see what the state of Christianity then was and still ought to be. 1. And now havmg shown in the foregoing chapter what deference we ought to pay to the authority of those holy men, whose writings I 24 PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE. have here collected, it may not be amiss, in the third place, to inquire what it is which they deliver to us — what account we find in them of the doctrine and discipline of the church, m those times in which they lived. 2. It would be endless for me to go about to make a just catalogue of all the particulars of this kind that occur in the followmg pieces ; and I have already, in a great measure, performed it in the index which I have for that purpose subjoined to them. I shaJl therefore here consider only a few particulars, in such points as may seem most worthy to be remarked ; and by them (as by a short specimen) show how the judicious reader may himself improve it into a more particular history of the faith and practice of the church in this first and purest period of it. 3. And, first, for what concerns the doctrines of those times, there is hardly any point that is necessary to be believed or known by us that is not very plainly delivered in some or other of the following pieces. 4. Here we may read what we are to believe concerning thp first article of our creed, God the Father :» That he is One, Almighty, In- visible, the Creator and Maker of all things : that he is Omniscient, Immense ; neither to be comprehended within any bounds, nor so much as to be perfectly conceived by us; that his providence is over all things ; and that we can none of us flee from him, or escape his knowledge ; that we are to believe in him, to fear him, to love him ; and, fearing him, to abstain from all evil. 5. If from thence we go to the next person of the blessed Trinity, our Saviour Jesus Christ,* here we shall find all that our creed teaches us to profess concerning him, or that any Christian need to believe : — that he existed not only before he came into the world, but from all eternity — that he is not only the Son of God, but is himself also God — that in the fulness of time he took upon him our nature, and became man ; was born of the Virgin Mary, was crucified under Pontius Pilate — that he suffered for our salvation, and was raised again from the dead, not only by the power of the Father, but by his own also — that he is our high priest and protector now, and shall come again at the end of the world, to judge the whole race of mankind' — that there is no coming unto God but by him; insomuch that even the ancient fathers, who died before his appearing, were yet saved by the same means that we are now- 6. As for Tvhat concerns the Holy Spirit, the third person in the glorious Godhead, he is here set out to us° as the Spirit of God, who is glorified and worshipped together with the Fallier and the Son, » See Index, God. ' See Index, Christ. ' See Index, Trinity. SUBJECT OF THE FOLLOWING DISCOURSES. 25 (although distinct from both,) and communicated by the Son" to the prophets, who also sanctifieth and endueth the faithful with many gifts for the edification of the church. 7. And now I am mentioning the Holy Spirit, let me add that we may here see what is needfid to be known concerning all the other spirits* of an inferior nature, — how the holy angels minister unto us, but especially then when we have the most need of them, at the time of our death, — and that though the devil may attack us, and use all his arts to draw us away from our duty, yet it must be our own fault if we are overcome by him, and that therefore we ought not to be afraid of him. 8. But to return to our creed, and the articles of it : here we farther see both what a great obligation there lies upon us to keep up a com- munion" of saints in the unity of the church on earth, and what is tha,t true fellowship that we ought to have with those who are gone before us to heaven : that it consists not in the worship of any, though never so gloriously exalted by God, but in love and remembrance; in thanks- giving to God for their excellencies ; and in our prayers to him, joined with hearty endeavours of our own, to imitate their perfections. 9. And, whilst we do this, we are assured of the forgiveness* of our sins, through the merits and satisfaction of Jesus Christ ; and that not only of those which we committed before our baptism, but of all such as we shall chance to fall into after, if we truly repent of them, except only the great sin of wilfully and maliciously blaspheming God and his Holy Spirit, which was thought to be hardly, if at all, remissible, either in this world or ia the other. 10. As for the next point, the resurrection of the body,' it is not barely asserted, but is at large proved too, in the following discourses. There we are told, not only that there shall be a future resurrection, but a resurrection of the flesh, — that we shall be raised in the very same bodies in which we go down into the grave, — and that, being raised, we shall be judged by Christ, according to our works, and be either unspeakably rewarded, or exceedingly punished, to all eternity.-'' 11. If from the articles of our creed we go on to the holy sacrament ^ of the church, here we have set out to us the great benefit of our bap- tism, and of what a mighty concern it is to us in the business of our salvation. And, for the other sacrament, here we are taught that the elements of bread and wine* are the same (as to their substance) after consecration, that they were before ; and are only in a spiritual sense » See Mart. Ignat. sec. 14. Polyc. sec. 14, 32. » See Index, Angel, Deoil. ' See Index, Feace, Unity, Martyrs, Reliques, &c. •' See Index, Repentance. ' See Index, Seswredion. fSeelniex, Punishment. s Seelndex, Sacrament, Baptism. "See Index, Transubatantiation. 4 C 26 PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE. the flesh and blood of our Saviour Christ, by the participation of which we shall be immortalized, and live for ever. 12. And lastly, for that great, comprehensive point of our religion, the foundation of our faith, the holy scriptures," here we may see what opinion the holy men had of the divine inspiration of them, what defer- ence they paid to them, and how they looked upon them to contain the true words of the Holy Ghost. 13. Such is the doctrine of faith that is here delivered to us. If from thence we pass, secondly, to what concerns the public order and government of the church, in the first establishment of it, here we may see by what persons' it was directed, and how exactly our own church does in this particular resemble the primitive, perhaps beyond any other at this day in the world, in the apostolical orders of bishops, priests, and deacons. 14. How necessarily they esteemed it their duty to keep up a strict communion" with these governors, and how little they thought the very name of the church could belong to those who separated from them, we are here likevrise taught. And, how light soever some may make of the business of schism" now, yet it is plain these holy men had a very different apprehension of it, aiid hardly thought that such could be saved as continued in it. 15. And the same, or rather much worse, was their opinion of here- tics and apostates :" to the latter of which, as they seem even to have denied repentance, if that apostasy was joined with blasphemy, so it is manifest that, without it, they thought the others must perish. And in the mean time they declare that we ought not to have any communica- tion with them : only we must pray for them, that they may be con- verted, which yet they supposed would be very hard. 16. As for those who continued in the doctrine and communion of the church,^ here we may see how zealous they were in attending all the public offices of it, — how constantly they assembled together for the worship of God, notwithstanding all the malice and fury of their enemies against them upon the account of it. Here we may observe how, from the beginning, they had their set times and places of wor- ship, and how they looked upon such offertories both as more accept- able unto God and more prevalent with him than any private addresses that they could make to him. 17. In these assembhes they not only put up their prayers to God, but received also the holy sacrament* of the Lord's Supper; and in that part of the service none officiated but either the bishop himself or he who was appointed, or allowed of, by him. " See Index, Scripture. ' See Index, Bishops. ' See Index, Bishops. ^ See Index, SrAism. ' SeelaAex, Herelic, Jpostate. /See Index, TFbrs/iip, &c. fSee Index, Sacrament, Bishc^. SUBJECT OF THE FOLLOWING DISCOURSES. 27 18. For this purpose they had in every such place of their assembling one table or altar, upon which their oblations were presented to God by the bishops and priests ;" and they communicated after the same manner that our Saviour Christ had set them the example — that is to say, both of the consecrated bread and wine ; and the former taken from one common loaf, which was broken and distributed to them, not in little, separate, and unbroken wafers, as some now do. 19. Nor was this all ; in these assemblies the Holy Scriptures were read to them ; and, as I have before shown, some of the very treatises I have here subjoined, together with them : and the bishop himself instructed the people, and expounded the doctrine of Christ to them." 20. By the bishop were the Christians blessed, and joined together in the holy state of matrimony :" and indeed without him was nothing done of all that pertained unto religion. 21. In those times the clergy*" were married as well as laity ; nor do we find it esteemed the least scandal for them so to be. 22. Here we may see what the ancient manner of fasting' was, and what was thought requisite to render such exercises acceptable to God and profitable to our own souls. 23. In short, here we may perceive what their opinion was of re- pentance for sins,*" and how hardly they thought of those who were still repenting and yet still continued to sin on, notwithstanding their frequent repentance. But, especially, here we are told that we must finish our repentance before we die, for that there is no place for re- pentance after. 24. And though they prescribed confession^ as one act of repent- ance, and necessary to be performed in order to our forgiveness, yet we find no confession mentioned to be made to any but to God only, which therefore seems to intimate to us that they accounted that alone tt) have been sufficient. 25. But the care of their bishops* in those first times was not con- fined within the narrow bounds of their own churches, but extended to all the faithful, wheresoever they were: and they were still ready to look to those who were at the greatest distance from them, whenever they thought their advice or authority might be either useful to them or for the honour and benefit of their leligion. 26. From this, and from the general piety and excellence of their lives,' joined to the greatness of their character in the church, came that mighty respect that was paid to the bishops in those days ; and how great it was, the following treatises abundantly show. <■ Ipiat. Epist. to the Ephes. sec. 5. » Ignat. Mart. sec. 2. 'See Index, Marriage, , Msh^. ''See Index, Priest. "See Index, Fast. /See Index, Repentance. eSee Index, Confesmn. "See Ignatius's Epistles and Martyrdom, &c. ''See Index, Bishop. 28 PRELIMINARY' DISCOURSE. 27. But much greater was their veneration for those who not only governed well, and adorned their holy profession by an exemplary life, but confirmed the truth of it with their blood." They are indeed of opinion that no man ought causelessly to expose himself unto suffer- ing ;' but if God called any one to it, they doubted not but that our Saviour Christ would both support him in his conflicts and most gloriously reward him for the enduring of them. Hence was it their opinion that martyrdom blotted out all sins, — that they who suffered for the faith should have a degree of glory peculiar to themselves, above all other saints in God's kingdom ; and, when God showed such regard for them, they concluded that they could never do enough to testify their respect to them. 28. To this we must ascribe the care they took to gather up their remains," the honour which they paid to them, and the solemnities with which they deposited them in the earth ; hence came their custom, which we here find, of writing down the particulars of their conflicts, and sending theni abroad to the churches round about ; hence their anniversary meetings at their tombs and monuments, where they re- cited the acts of their martyrdoms, and sometimes made express dis- courses in praise of their martyrs, and to exhort one another to the like constancy. 29. But, not to insist any longer upon these particulars, there is yet a third sort of matters contained in these discourses, and those of no less use to us than either of the foregoing, and that is the practical rules of life that are here delivered to us. 30. Here we may see what care we are to take, not only not to sin* ourselves, but, as far as in us lies, not to let any that belong to us con- tinue in sin, lest we also become partakers of their evil doings. 31. Here we are taught not only to have a care of our words and actions,' but of our very thoughts and desires, which must not be in- dulged in any instances of sin, nor be suffered, if it be possible, to wander on any thing that is in the least measure wanton or irregular. 32. If we will hearken to these holy men, we must learn not only to do the will of God, but, if it be his pleasure, must prepare our minds to endure patiently whatever he shall think fit to lay upon us. We must consider that troubles and afflictions are sent upon us both to punish us for our sins and as monitors to draw us off from them. 33. To convince us the more effectually of this, we are here shown the mighty danger of riches,-'' especially where men's hearts are in any degree set upon them, and how very hardly such persons shall be saved ; we are taught what use we should make of our abundance. "See Index, Mm-tyrs. 'See Index, Suffer. 'See Index, Rdiques, Martyrs. i" Scie. Index, Sm. 'Harm. Vis. i. /See Index, Riches, Almsgiving, &c. SUBJECT or THE FOLLOWING DISCOURSES. 29 that so it may not prove a snare to us ; but especially we are shown the great advantage of almsgiving to this end, and what mighty en- gagements there lie upon us to the practice of it. 34. And then, as for our Hves, we are here told that a Christian" must not only be good, but exemplary ; he must show the truth of his profession by a suitable conversation, and be known by his actions rather than by his words. 35. He must pray for all men, even for his enemies ; nay, for the very enemies of the church, for heretics and schismatics, for those of whom there is but little hope that they will ever come to repentance, or that God will give them grace so to do. 36. He must be land and charitable to all- men, free from envy and contention ; he must neither raise any differences among his brethren, nor follow any in the doing of it. To this end he must carefully ob- serve those duties which relate to his neighbour, as well as those he is to pay to God. He must obey magistrates, must respect the aged, must have, a due regard to all men.^ Is he a husband, a parent, or a child ? He must be sure to exercise himself in the several duties be- coming those several relations. In short, in the foUow'ing writings we may see — in all the parts of our duty towards God, our neighbour, and ourselves — what we are to do, and what to avoid ; and are assured that God both sees all our actions now, and will reward or punish us for them hereafter to all eternity. 37. And thus have I given a short prospect of what is more largely contained in the following collection. I need not say either how use- ful a variety of matter it is, or how wortliy to be known by all of us ; but sure I am, whosoever shall take the pains impartially to compare what is here found with the sacred writings of the New Testament, he may be able, both with clearness and certainty, to understand what- ever is requisite to his eternal salvation, and that with much more satis- faction, and security too, than from many volumes of our later writers, who, for the most part, spend a great deal of time, and take much pains, to obscure, rather than explain, the most easy and intelligible points of our religion. See Index, Christian. c2 30 PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE. CHAPTER V. OF THE MANNER AFTER WHICH THESE DISCOURSES ARE WRITTEN, AND THE SIMPLICITY OF STYLE USED IN THEM. That the Writers of those times used no aiFectation of Human Eloquence, but delivered themselves with the greatest Plainness that they were able. — This manner of writing the best, and most proper, for Instruction. — A short Account of the Occasifln of the present Collection, and the Translation that is here made of the following Treatises. 1. There is yet one thing to be observed by me with reference to the discourses here subjoined, and that is, fourthly, concerning the manner after which they are written, and that true primitive simplicity which appears in all the parts of them. 2. It is one property of truth that, as it does not need any disguises, so neither does it seek, by any vain ornaments of human eloquence, to recommend itself to the approbation of those to whom it is tendered. When the apostles preached the gospel to the world, they did it not " with excellency of speech, nor with enticing words of man's wisdom, but in the demonstration of spirit and of power;" they gave such con- vincing proofs of their divine mission, as forced all indifferent persons to acknowledge their authority ; and they thought it, after that, too mean a thing to endeavour to catch men's ears, when, without any such arts, they had before captivated their reason, and forced them to confess the truth of what they delivered. 3. And the same was the method of those holy fathers who succeeded them : they knew the excellency of their doctrine, and the mighty in- fluence which the revelations it made of the future state would be sure to have upon the minds of all considering men ; and therefore they contented themselves to lay these things before them in a plain and simple manner, and yet with such efficacy and power as surpassed all the rhetoric in the world; "for," indeed, <