/rK' y Cornell University Law Librar* The Moak Collection ' PURCHASED FOR The School of Law of Cornell University And Presented February 14, 1893 IN HEnORY OP JUDGE DOUQLASS BOARDMAN * ' . FIRST DEAN OF THE SCHOOL By his Wife and Daughter A. M. BOARDMAN and ELLEN D. WILLIAMS Cornell University Librai7 KF 2994.B78C6 Copyright, its law and its literature /b 3 1924 019 212 228 DATE DUE 1 I "^ OAYLDAD t»itmTet>(NU3 A. Cornell University Library The original of this bool< is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924019212228 COPYRIGHT ITS LAW AND ITS LITERATURE BEING A SUMMARY OF THE PRINCIPLES AND LAW OF COPY- RIGHT, With especial reference to books -> , fS BY R. R BOWKER WITH A BIBLIOGRAPHY OF LITERARY PROPERTY THORVALD SOLBERG. NEW YORK Office of THE PUBLISHERS' WEEKLY LONDON : SAMPSON LOW, MARSTON, SEARLE & RIVINGTON 1886 COPYRIGHT, 1886, By R. R. BOWKER. A II rights reserved. PREFATORY NOTE. The present work is an attempt to give in brief and simple shape a comprehensive view- such as did not exist, despite an evident need — of the principles, history, and present law of copy- right, domestic and international. It was first published, in chapters, as editorial articles in the Publishers' Weekly, July to October, 1885 ; it has since been revised and extended to the spring of 1886. Its preparation has involved careful study, not only of the leading copyright authorities, such as Copinger on the Law of Copyright (2d edition, London, 1881), and Drone on Copyright {Boston, 1879), respectively the foremost English and American legal treatises on the subject, but of numerous other sources of information, such as the early Parliamentary law reports ; the Mor- rill report to Congress in 1873, and the valuable Report, with digest and Evidence, of the British Royal Copyright Commission to Parliament, in 1878 ; the papers of Mr. H. D. Macleod and Mr. G. H. Putnam in Lalor's " Cyclopi^ia ofiPolitical Science ;" Griswold's Synopsis of Copyright Decisions (Bangor, 1883), and Spalding's handy alphabetical abridgment of the Law of Copyright (Philadelphia, 1878) ; besides many volumes, reports, magazine articles, and newspaper clippings, contained in the copyright collection of the Publishers' Weekly office or reprinted in its columns. Mr. A. R. Spofford, Librarian of Congress, has kindly gone over the proofs critically and made valu- able corrections, and I am indebted also to Mr. S. E. Dawson, of Montreal, for revision of the portion relating to Canadian law and practice. It has been impracticable, within the compass of the work, to give references to authorities ; but these can largely be supplied from the tables of cases and indexes of Copinger and Drone ; and most of the bills, reports, etc., of recent years will be found in lull in the volumes of the Publishers' Weekly. I have tried, however, to present a summary which will be found trustworthy as well as readable, which carefully discriminates between settled principles of law, judicial constructions, and mooted points, and which, except in the preliminary chapter, where the theory of copyright Is discussed, and in the last, on copyright reform, avoids for the most part the interpolation of the writer's personal opinions. The frequent use of the word '' probably" or its equivalent suggests how unsettled is the condition of copy- right law. I trust this summary may be of service as well In the reform of domestic copyright as in the promotion of international copyright. The completeness and efficiency of the protection of property by a State is a chief test of Its civilization, and it is to be hoped that the United States will not long remain almost the only exception among civilized nations in rejecting international copyright. This national disgrace should be blotted out. Only those who know by hard experience the difficulties of bibliographical work can appreciate fully the invaluable bibliography of literary property, compiled by Mr. Thorvald Solberg, which complements this little treatise. R. R. BOWKER. New York, February, 1886. CONTENTS. PART I. Page I. The Nature and Origin of Copyright, ... i II. The Early History op Copyright, ... .4 in. Development of Statutory Copyright in England, . . 6 IV. The History of Copyright in the United States, . . 8 V. What can be Copyrighted, . . ... 10 VI. The Ownership and Duration of Copyright, . . 15 VII. The Entry and Protection of Copyrights, ..... 18 VIII. Statutory Copyright in Other Countries, . . .21 IX. International Copyright in Europe, . . .25 X. The International Copyright Movement in America, 28 XI. Copyright Progress — Authors and Publishers, , 33 Copyright Law of the United States, . 37 Copyright Law of Great Britain, ..... -43 Memorial of American Authors for International Copyright, . . 57 PART II. Bibliography of Literary Property, . . .1 A SUMMARY OF THE PRINCIPLES AND LAW OF COPYRIGHT, WITH ESPECIAL REFERENCE TO BOOKS. BY R. R. BOWKER. COPYRIGHT. I. THE NATURE AND ORIGIN OF COPYRIGHT. COPYRIGHT (from the Latin copia, plenty) means, in general, the right to copy, to make plenty. In its specific application it means the right to multiply copies of those products of the human brain known as literature and art. There is another legal sense of the word "copyright" much emphasized by several Eng- lish justices. Through the low Latin use of the word copia, our word' "copy" has a secondary and reversed meaning, as the pattern to be copied or made plenty, in which sense the schoolboy copies from the "copy" set in his copy-book, and the modern printer calls for the author's "copy." Copyright, accordingly, may also mean the right in copy made (whether the origi- nal work or a duplication of it), as well as the right to make copies, which by no means goes with the work or any duplicate of it. Said Lord St. Leonards: "When we are talking of the right of an author we must distinguish between the mere right to his manuscript, and to any copy which he may choose to make of it, as his prop- erty, just like any other personal chattel, and the right to multiply copies to the exclusion of every other person. Nothing can be more distinct than these two things. The common law does give a man who has composed a work a right to it at composition, just as he has a right to any other part of his personal property ; but the question of the right of excluding all the world from copy- ing, and of himself claiming the exclusive right of forever copying his own composition after he has published it to the world, is a totally differ- ent thing." Baron Parks, in the same case. pointed out expressly these two different legal senses of the word copyright, the right in copy, a right of possession, always fully protected by the common law, and the right to copy, a right of multiplication, which alone has been the sub- ject of special statutory protection. There is nothing which may more properly be ca#id property than the creation of the individual brain. For property means a man's very own, and there is nothing more his own than the thought, created, made out 'of no material thing (unless the nerve-food which the brain consumes in the act of thinking be so counted), which uses material things only for its record or manifestation. The best proof of owK-ership is that, if this individual man or woman had not thought this individual thought, realized in writing or in music or in marble, it would not exist. Or if the individual, thinking it, had put it aside without such record, it would not, in any practical sense, exist. We cannot know what " might have beens'' of untold value have been lost to the world where thinkers, such as inventors, have had no inducement or opportunity to so materialize their thoughts. It is sometimes said, as a bar to this idea of property, that no thought is new — that every thinker is dependent upon the gifts of nature and the thoughts of other thinkers before him, as every tiller of Ihe soil is dependent upon the land as given by nature and improved by the men who have toiled and tilled before him, a view of which Henry C. Carey has been the chief ex- ponent in this country. But there is no real copyright: analogy — aside from the question whether the denial of individual property in land would not be setting back the hands of progress. If Farmer Jones does not raise potatoes from a piece of land Farmer Smith can ; but Shaitespeare can- not write " Paradise Lost" nor IMilton " Much Ado," though before both Dante dreamed and Boccaccio told his tales. It was because of Milton and Shakespeare writing, not because of Dante and Boccaccio who had written, that these immortal works are treasures of the Eng- lish tongue. It was the very self of each, in propria persona, that gave these form and worth, though they used words that had come down from generations as the common heritage of English-speaking men. Property in a stream of water, as has been pointed out, is not in the atoms of the water but in the flow of the stream. Property right in unpublished works has never been effectively questioned — a fact which in itself confirms the view that intellectual property is a natural inherent right. The author has ' ' su- preme control" over an unpublished work, and his manuscript cannot be utilized by creditors as assets without his consent. " If he lends a copy to another," says Baron Parks, " his right is not gone ; if he sends it to another under an im- plied undertaking that he is not to part with it or publish it he has a right to enforce that undertaking." The receiver of a letter, to whom the paper containing the writing has un- doubtedly been given, has no right to publish or otherwise use the letter without the writer's consent. The theory that by permitting copies to be made, an author dedicates his writing to the public, as an owner of land dedicates a road to the public by permitting public use of it for twenty-one years, overlooks the fact that in so doing the author only conveys to each holder of his book the right to individual use, and not the right to multiply copies, as though the landowner should not give but sell permission to individuals to pass over his road, without any permission to them to sell tickets for the same privilege to other people. The owner of a right does not forfeit a right by selling a privi- lege. It is at the moment of publication that the un- disputed possessory right passes over into the much-disputed right to multiply copies, and that the vexed question of the true theory of copy- right property arises. The broad view of literary property holds that the one kind of copyright is involved in the other. The right to have is the right to use. An author cannot use — that is, get beneficial results from his work, without offering copies for sale. He would be otherwise like the owner of a loaf of bread who was told that the bread was his until he wanted to eat it. That sale would seem to contain "an implied under- taking " that the buyer has liberty to use his copy but not to multiply it. Peculiarly in this kind of property the right of ownership consists in the right to prevent use of one's property by others without the owner's consent. The right of exclusion seems to be indeed a part of ownership. In the case of land the owner is entitled to prevent trespass to the extent of a shot-gun, and in the same way the law recog- nizes the right to use violence, even to the ex- treme, in preventing others from possession of one's own property of any kind. The owner of a literary property has, however, no physical means of defence or redress ; the very act of publication by which he gets a market for his productions opens him to the danger of wider multiplication and publication without his con- sent. There is, therefore, no kind of property which is so dependent on the help of the law for the protection of the real owner. The inherent right of authors is a right at what is called common law — that is, natural or customary law. So far as concerns the undisputed rights before publication, the copyright laws are auxiliary merely to common law. Rights exist before remedies ; remedies are merely invented to enforce rights. " The seeking for the law of the right of property in the law of procedure re- lating to the remedies," says Copinger, " is a mistake similar to supposing that the mark on the ear of an animal is the cause, instead of the consequence, of property therein." After the invention of printing it became evident that new methods of procedure must be devised to enforce common law rights. Copyright became therefore the subject of statute law, by the pas- sage of laws imposing penalties for a theft which, without such laws, could not be punished. These laws, covering naturally enough only the country of the author, and specifying a time dur- ing which the penalties could be enforced, and providing means of registration by which authors could register their property rights, as the title to a house is registered when it is sold, had an unexpected result. The statute of Anne, which is the foundation of present English copyright law, intended to protect authors' rights by providing penalties against their violation, had the effect of COP Y RIGHT. limiting tliose rights. It was doubtless the in- tention of those who framed the statute of Anne to establish, for the benefit of authors, specific means of redress. Overlooking, apparently, the fact that law and equity, as their principles were then established, enabled authors to use the same means of redress, so far as they held good, which persons suffering wrongs as to other property had, the law was so drawn that in 1774 the Eng- lish House of Lords (against, however,the weight of one half of English judicial opinion) decided that, instead of giving additional sanction to a formerly existing right, the statute of Anne had substituted a new and lesser right to the exclusion of what the majority of English judges held to have been an old and greater right. Literary and like property to this extent lost the character of copyright, and became tiie subject of co^y-privi- lege, depending on legal enactment for the secur- ity of the private owner. American courts, wont to follow English precedent, have rather taken for granted this view of the law of literary property, and our Constitution, in authorizing Congress to secure " for limited terms to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respec- tive writings and discoveries," was evidently drawn from the same point of view, though it does not in itself deny or withdraw the natural rights of the author at common law. II. THE EARLY HISTORY OF COPYRIGHT. Our traditions of the blind Homer, singing his Iliad in the multitudinous places of his protean nativity, do not vouchsafe us any infor- mation as to the status of authors in his day. But there is mention in Roman literature of the sale of " playright" by the dramatic authors, as Ter- ence, and Rome had booksellers who sold copies of poems written out by slaves, and who seem to have been protected by some kind of " cour- tesy of the trade," since Martial names cer- tain booksellers who had specific poems of his for sale. Horace complains that the Sosius brothers, his publishers, got gold while he got only fame ; but this may have been a pre-his- toric " author's grumble," and itis probable that some kind of payment was made to authors. There is, nevertheless, no valid evidence of the protection of book-property until the invention of printing. This raised, of course, many new questions, wherever the guardians of the law were set to their chronic task of applying old ideas of right to new conditions. At first the " privileges " were granted chiefly to printers, but possibly as the representatives of the writers. The first recorded instance is in 1491, when Ven- ice gave to the publicist Peter of Ravenna and the publisher of his choice the exclusive right to print and sell his " Phoenix. ' ' The Italian States encouraged printing by granting to different printers exclusive rights for fourteen years, more or less, of printing specified classics, a practice certainly not founded on authors' rights, but rather on a theory of eminent domain and State monopoly of such property. Similar privileges were issued in Germany, the first at Nuremberg, 1501, for the works of a nun-poet who had been dead for six hundred years, and some of these provided penalties against reprinters. General acts providing both protection and penalties were passed in Germany as early as i65o. In France, from the times of Louis XII., " letters of the king" forbid booksellers, printers, and other persons to " introduce foreign impressions" (meaning, it is supposed, unauthorized reprints) of the books to which such letters were appended. They were usually issued to printers. In 1556 a general ordinance of Henry II. defined literary property. In England a Royal Printer was appointed in 1504, and to his successor, Richard Pynson, in 1518, the first printing " privilege" was issued, in the form of a prohibition for two years of the printing by any other person of a certain speech to which this first English copyright notice was appended. Henry VIII. granted many such privileges, and in 1533 appeared the first com- plaint of piracy, that of Wynken de Worde, who obtained the king's privilege for his second edition of Witinton's Grammar, because Peter Trevers had pirated it from the edition of 1523. In 1530 the first English copyright to an author was granted to John Palsgrave, who, having pub- lished a French grammar at his own expense, received a privilege for seven years. Up to the middle of the sixteenth century " copyrights" were in form printers' licenses, and even in this case Palsgrave seems to have been recog- nized rather because he published his own book than because he wrote it. The "Stationers' Company," chartered in 1556, was in part a device to prevent seditious printing, by prohibiting any printing in England except by those registered in its membership. In 1558, under a second charter, its by-laws pro- vided that every one who printed a book should COP Y RIGHT. register it and pay a fee, and those who failed to do this, or who printed another member's book, were to be fined. In 1559 fines of this last sort, and in 1573 sales of " copy," are entered. The practice now grew up of granting patents or monopolies to persons for a whole class of books, and the Stationers' Company itself held that for almanacs up to a very late period. These monop- olies were defied, and the Star Chamber decree of 1566, disabling offending printers from exer- cising their trade and prescribing three months' imprisonment, did not avail. In 1640 the Star Chamber and all the regulations of the press were abolished, but the abuse of unlicensed printing led to anew licensing act in 1643, which prohibited printing or importing without consent of the ozvner, on pain of forfeiture of copies to the owner, and which renewed the order that all books should be entered in the register of the Stationers' Company. The early registers still exist in Stationer's Hall, near Paternoster Row, London, in quaint and almost undecipherable chirography, and some of them have been re- issued in facsimile. It was against the licens- ing act of this date that Milton, in 1644, printed his " Areopagitica," but he particularly excepts from his criticism of the act the part providing for " the just retaining of each man his several copy, which God forbid should be gainsaid." In 1649 Parliament provided a penalty of ts. %d. and foifeiture for the piracy of registered books, and prohibited presses except at London, Finsbury, York, and the universities, and in 1662 it added the requirement of deposit of a copy at the king's library and at each of the uni- versities. To prevent fraudulent changes in a book after licensing, it was further required that a copy be deposited with the licenser at the time of application — apparently the origin of our record-deposit. With the expiration of these acts in 1679 legislative penalties lapsed, and pi- racy became common. Charles II. in 1684 re- newed the charter of the Stationers' Company, ap- proved its-register, and confirmed to proprietors of books "the sale, right, power, and privilege and authority of printing, as has been usual here- tofore." The licensing act of i649-'62 was re- vived in 1685, and renewed up to 1694, although the booksellers now petitioned against it, and eleven peers protested against subjecting learning to a mercenary and perhaps ignorant licenser, and destroying the property of authors in their copies. The law lapsed because of the indigna- tion of the Commons against the arbitrary power of the license, but the result was the abolition of statutory penalties, leaving the punishment of piracy a matter of damages at common law, re- quiring a separate action for each copy sold, usu- ally against irresponsible people. Piracy again flourished. The right at common law seems, however, to have been unquestioned, and the Court of Common Pleas held that a plaintiff who had purchased from the executors of an author was owner of the property at common law. Owners of literary property petitioned Parlia- ment, 1703 to 1709, for security and redress, declaring that the property of English authors had always been held as sacred among the trad- ers, that conveyance gave just and legal title, that the property was the same with houses and other estates, and that existing "copies" had cost at least £50,000, and had been used in mar- riage settlements and were the subsistence of many widows and orphans. This led to the famous statute of Anne, passed March, 1710, " for the encouragement of learning," which re- mains the practical foundation of copyright in England and America to-day. III. DEVELOPMENT OF STATUTORY COPYRIGHT IN ENGLAND. The statute of Anne, the foundation of the present copyright system, which took effect April 10, 1710, gave the author of works then existing, or his assigns, the sole right of printing for twenty-one years from that date and no longer ; of works not printed, for fourteen years and no longer, except in case he were alive at the ex- piration of that term, when he could have the privilege prolonged for another fourteen years. Penalties were provided, which could not be ex- acted unless the books were registered with the Stationers' Company, and which must be sued for within three months after the offence. If too high prices were charged, the Queen's officers might order them lowered. A book could not be imported without written consent of the owner of the copyright. The number of deposit copies was increased to nine. The act was not to prejudice any previous rights of the universities and others. This act did not touch the question of rights at common law, and soon after its statutory term of protection on previously printed books ex- pired, in 1731, lawsuits began. The first was that of Eyre vs. Walker, in which Sir Joseph Jekyll granted, in 1735, an injunction as to " The Whole Duty of Man," which had been first published in 1657, or seventy-eight years before. In this and several other cases the Court of Chancery issued injunctions on the theory that the legal right was unquestioned. But in 1769 the famous case of Millar vs. Taylor, as to the copyright of Thomson's " Seasons," brought directly before the Court of King's Bench the question whether rights at common law still ex- isted, aside from the statute and its period of protection. In this case Lord Mansfield and two other judges held that an author had, at common law, a perpetual copyright, independent of statute, one dissenting justice holding that there was no such property at common law. In 1774, in the case of Donaldsons vs. Beckett, this deci- sion was appealed from, and the issue was carried to the highest tribunal, the House of Lords. The House of Lords propounded five questions to the judges. These, with the replies,* were as follows : I. Whether at common law, an author of any book or literary composition had the sole right of first printing and publishing the same for sale ; and might bring an action against any person who printed, published, and sold the same with- out his consent ? Yes, 10 to i that he had the sole right, etc., and 8 to 3 that he might bring the action. II. If the author had such right originally, did the law take it away, upon his printing and pub- lishing such book or literary composition ; and might any person afterward reprint and sell, for his own benefit, such book or literary composi- tion against the will of the author ? No, 7 to 4. III. If such action would have lain at com- mon law, is it taken away by the Statute of 8th Anne ? And is an author, by the said statute, pre- cluded from every remedy, except on the foun- dation of the said statute and on the terms and conditions prescribed thereby ? Yes, 6 to 5. IV. Whether the author of any literary com- position and his assigns, had the sole right of printing and publishing the same in perpetuity, by the common law ? Yes, 7 to 4. * The votes_ on these decisions are given differently iu the Reveral copyright authorities. These figures are corrected from 4 Burrow^s Reports, Z408, the leading English parlia- mentary reports, and are probably right. ^COPYRIGHT. V. Whether this right is any way impeached, restrained, or taken away by the Statute 8th Anne ? Yes, 6 to 5. These decisions, that there was perpetual copyright at common law, which was not lost by publication, but that the statute of Anne took away that right and confined reme- dies to the statutory provisions, were directly contrary to the previous decrees of the courts, and on a motion seconded by the Lord Chancel- lor, the House of Lords, 22 to 11, reversed the decree in the case at issue. This construction by the Lords, in the case of Donaldsons vs. Beckett, of the statute of Anne, has practically " laid down the law" for England and America ever since. Two protests against this action deserve note. The first, that of the universities, was met by an act of 1775, which granted to the English and Scotch universities and to the colleges of Eton, Westminster, and Winchester (Dublin was added in 1801) perpetual copyright in works bequeathed to and printed by them. The other, that of the booksellers, presented 10 the Commons Febru- ary 28, 1774, set forth that the petitioners had in- vested large sums in the belief of perpetuity of copyright, but a bill for their relief was rejected. In 1801 an act was passed authorizing suits for damages [at common law, as well as penalties under statute] during the period of protection of the statute, the need for such a law having been shown in the case of Beckford vs. Hood, where- in the court had to " stretch a point" to protect the plaintiff's rights in an anonymous book, which he had not entered in the Stationers' Regis- ter. An act of 1814 extended copyright to twenty- eight years and for the remainder of the life of a surviving author, and relieved the author of the necessity of delivering the eleven library copies, except on demand. These deposit copies were reduced to five by the act of 1836. In 1841, under the leadership of Sergeant Tal- fourd, a great debate on copyright, in which Ma- caulay took a leading part in favor of restricted copyright, was started in the Commons, which resulted in the act of 1842 (5 and 6 Victoria), repealing the previous acts, and presenting a new code of copyright. It practically preserved, however, the restrictions of the Statute of Anne. The copyright term was made the author's life- time and seven years beyond, but in any event at least forty-two years. The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council may authorize publication of a posthumous work in case the proprietor of the copyright refuse to publish. Articles in periodicals, etc. have the same copyright term, but they revert to the author after twenty-eight years. Subsequent acts extend copyright to prints and like art works, designs for manufact- ures, sculptures, dramas, musical compositions, lectures, for various terms and under differing conditions. The present law of England as to copyright, says the Report of the Royal Copyright Commis- sion, in a Blue Book of 1878, " consists partly of the provisions of fourteen Acts of Parliament, which relate in whole or in part to different branches of the subject, and partly of common law principles, nowhere stated in any definite or authoritative way, but implied in a considerable number of reported cases scattered over the law reports." The Digest, by Sir James Stephen, appended to this Report, is presented by the Commission as " a correct statement of the law as it stands." This Digest is, perhaps, the most valuable single contribution yet made to the liter- ature of copyright, but the frequency with which such phrases occur as "it is probable, but not certain," "it is uncertain," "probably," "it seems," show the state of the law, " wholly des- titute of any sort of arrangement, incomplete, often obscure," as says the Report itself. The Digest is accompanied, in parallel columns, with alterations suggested by the Commission, and it is much to be regretted that their work failed to reach the expected result of an Act of Parlia- ment. The evidence taken by the commissioners forms a second Blue Book, also of great value. A new copyright law is now under consideration in England. It seems possible that, under the precedent of the acts of 1775 and 1801, the common law rights practically taken away by the statute of Anne could be restored by legislation. Its re- strictions have not only ruled the practice of England ever since, but they were embodied in the Constitution of the United States, and have influenced alike our legislators and our courts. IV. THE HISTORY OF COPYRIGHT IN THE UNITED STATES. The Constitution of the United States author- ized Congress "to promote the progress of science and useful arts by securing for limited times, to authors and inventors, the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries." Previous to its adoption, in 1787, the nation had no power to act, but on Madison's motion, Con- gress, in May, 1783, recommended the States to pass acts securing copyright for fourteen years. Connecticut in January, 1783, and Massachu- setts in March, 1783, had already provided copy- right for twenty-one years. Virginia in 1785, New York and New Jersey in 1786, also passed copyright acts, and other States were considering them, — thanks to the vigorous copyright crusade of Noah Webster, who travelled from capital to capital, — when the United States statute of 1790 made them unnecessary. This act followed the precedent of the English act of 1710, and gave to authors who were citizens or residents, their heirs and assigns, copyrights in books, maps, and charts for fourteen years, with renewal for four- teen years more, if the author were living at expi- ration of the first term. A printed title must be de- posited before publication in the clerk's office of the local United States District Court ; notice must be printed four times in a newspaper within two months after publication ; a copy must be deposited with the United States Secretary of State within six months after publication ; the penalties were forfeiture and a fine of fifty cents for each sheet found, half to go to the copyright owner, half to the United States ; a remedy was provided against unauthorized publication of manuscripts. This original and fundamental act was fol- lowed by others : — in 1802, requiring copyrigh'- record to be printed on or next the title-page, and including designs, engravings, and etchings ; in 1819, giving United States Circuit Courts original juiisdiction in copyright cases ; in 1831 (a consolidation of previous acts), including musical compositions, extending the term to twenty-eight years, with renewal for fourteen years to author, widow, or children, doing away with the newspaper notice except for renewals, and providing for the deposit of a copy with the district clerk (for transmission to the Secretary of State) within three months after publication ; in 1834, requiring record of assignment in the court of original entry ; in 1846 (the act establish- ing the Smithsonian Institution), requiring one copy to be delivered to that, and one to the Li- brary of Congress ; in 1856, securing to drama- tists the right of performance ; in 1859, repealing the provision of 1846 for the deposit of copies, and making the Interior Department instead of the State Department the copyright custodian ; in 1861, providlngfor appeal inall copyright cases to the Supreme Court ; in 1865, one act again requiring deposit with the Library of Congress, within one month from publication, another including photographs and negatives ; in 1867, providing $25 penalty for failure to deposit. This makes twelve acts bearing on copyright up to 1870, when a general act took the place of all, including "paintings, drawings, chromos, statues, statuary, and models or designs intended to be perfected as works of the fine arts." This did away with the local District Court system of registry, and made the Librarian of Congress the copyright officer, with whom printed title must be filed before, and two copies deposited within ten days after, publication. In 1873-74 COPYRIGHT. the copyright act was included in the Revised Statutes as Sections 4948 to 4971 (also see Sees. 629 and 699), and in 1874 an amendatory act made legal a short form of record, " Copyright, 18 — , by A. B.," and relegated labels to the Patent Ofiice. The act of 1790 received an interpretation, in 1834, in the case of Wheaton vs. Peters (rival law reports), at the bar of the United States Supreme Court, which placed copyright in the United States exactly in the status it held in England after the decision of the House of Lords in 1774. The court referred directly to that decision as the ruling precedent, and declared that by the stat- ute of 1790 Congress did not affirm an existing right, but created a right. It stated also that there was no common law of the United States, and that (English) common law as to copyright had not been adopted in Pennsylvania, where the case arose. So late as 1880, in Putnam vs. Pol- lard, claim was made that this ruling decision did not apply in New York, which, in its statute of 1786, expressly "provided, that nothing in this act shall extend to, affect, prejudice, or confirm the rights which any person may have to the printing or publishing of any books or pamphlets at common law, in cases not mentioned Jn this act." But the N. Y. Supreme Court decided that the precedent of Wheaton vs. Peters nevertheless held. As in the English case of Donaldsons vs. Beckett, the decision in the American ruling case came from a divided court. The opinion was handed down by Justice McLean, three other judges agreeing. Justices Thompson and Baldwin dissenting, a seventh judge being absent. The opinions of the dissenting judges (see Drone, p. 43 ?/ j-^y.) constitute one of the strongest state- ments ever made of nalural rights in literary property, in opposition to the ruling that the right is solely the creature of the statute. " An author's right," says Justice Thompson, "ought to be esteemed an inviolable right established in sound reason and abstract morality.'' The application of copyright law, unlike that re- garding patents, is solely a question of the courts. The Librarian of Congress is simply an officer of record, and makes no decisions, as is well stated in his general circular in reply to queries : " I have to advise you that no question concerning the validity of a copyright can be determined under our laws by any other authority than a United States Court. This office has no discretion or authority to refuse any applica- tion for a copyright coming within the provisions of the law, and all questions as to priority or infringement are purely judicial questions, with which the undersigned has nothing to do. " A certificate of copyright \?, privta facie evidence of an exclusive title, and is highly valuable as the foundation of a legal claim to the property involved in the publication. As no claim to exclusive property in the contents of a printed book or other article can be enforced under the common law. Congress has very properly provided the guarantees of such property which are embodied in the " Act to revise, consolidate, and amend the statutes relating to patents and copyrights," approved, July 8, 1870. If you obtain a copyright under the provisions of this act, you can claim damages from any person infringing your rights by printing or selling the same article ; but upon all ques- tions as to what constitutes an infringement, orwhat meas- ure of damages can be recovered, all parties are left to their proper remedy in the Courts of the United States." The many perplexities that arise under our complicated and unsatisfactory law, as it stands at present, suggest the need here, as in Eng- land, of a thorough re-modelling of our copyright system. V. WHAT CAN BE COPYRIGHTED. The United States law (Revised Statutes, Sees. 4948-71, being the act of Jul)' 8, 1870 ; also amendatory act of June 18, 1874) mentions as subjects of copyright " any boolj, map, chart, dramatic or musical composition, engraving, cut, print, photograph or negative thereof . . . paint- ing, drawing, chromo, statue, statuary . . . models or designs intended to be perfected as works of the fine arts," and excludes (amend- ment of 1874), as subject only to registry in the Patent Office, prints or labels not " connect- ed with the fine arts" but " designed to be used for any other articles of manufacture." The English laws now cover much the same ground. The United States statute expressly provides, however, that "nothing in this chapter shall be construed to prohibit the printing, publishing, importation or sale of any book, map, chart, dramatic or musical composition, print, cut, en- graving, or photograph, written, composed or made by any person not a citizen of the United States nor resident therein." The word "book" covers the great body of copyright property, and has been many times the subject of judicial construction giving the most comprehensive meaning to the term. The English judges early held that protection " could not depend upon the form of the publication ;" "that a composition on a single sheet might wellbeabook within the meaning of the Legislat- ure ;" and that " any composition, whether large or small, is a book within the meaning of this Act." The law of 5 and 6 Vict. (1842) after- ward specifically construed the word " book " " to mean and include every volume, part or division of a volume, pamphlet, sheet of letter- press, sheet of music, map, chart or plan, sep- arately published." The law of the United States makes no definition of the term, but our judges have followed the English precedent, Judge Thompson holding, in Clayton vs. Stone, that a "book" "may be printed only on one sheet," and that " the literary property intended to be protected by the Act is not to be deter- mined by the size, form or shape . . . but by the subject-matter," and Judge Leavitt, in Drury vs. Ewing, that a diagram for cutting dresses, with directions, printed on a single sheet, being " the product of thought and men- tal toil," was a "book" within the benefit of the law. In fact, though all English and American statutes have been avowedly for " the encour- agement of learning" and "the progress of science and useful arts,'' the courts have con- strued the laws to cover in the widest sense any "useful book." They have denied copyright protection only to works having absolutely no literary quality, such as advertisements (unless they contain original literary matter) and ad- vertising cuts, labels, blank-books, or a cricket score-card ; and even booksellers' and other trade catalogues, having descriptive notes or distinctive arrangement and combination, can be copyrighted. Compilations of existing ma- terials, from common sources, arranged and combined in an original and useful form, re- ceive the same protection as wholly original matter, and Mr. Drone schedules English or American judicial constructions extending this principle to : (i) general miscellaneous compila- tioiis ; (2) annotations consisting of common materials ; (3) dictionaries ; (4) books of chro- nology ; (5) gazetteers ; (6) itineraries, road and COPYRIGHT. guide-books ; (7) directories ; (8) maps and charts; (9) calendars; (10) catalogues; (11) mathematical tables ; (12) a list of hounds ; (13) abstracts of titles to lands ; and collections of (14) statistics, (15) statutory forms, (16) rec- ipes and (17) designs. The copyright in such cases may be in the combination and arrangement only, or it may be also in any original material included with other material. Quantity is not an essential element in copyright so much as "substantia! impor- tance ;" an English court protected a passage of only sixty words, and a Scotch justice contend- ed that Walter Scott's change of a single word in " Glenallan's Earl" authorized a copyright for the new edition, though another law lord differed, and the case was decided on other grounds. In the case of new editions, a few colorable alterations or unimportant notes will not justify a new copyright, but, as in the case of Lockhart's notes to Scott, the courts will pro- tect notes of substantial worth, though the copy- right on the text or on other notes printed with them has expired. In any case, the copyright on a new edition, whether made by re-writing, extending, condensing, annotating, or otherwise altering, runs independently, of the term of the original or any other edition, covers only the new parts, and cannot prevent the issue by others of the original or any other edition on which copy- right has expired. " A book must include every part of the book ; it must include every print, design or engraving which forms part of the book, as well as the letter-press therein, which is another part of it," according to the ruling decision of Vice- Chancellor Parker, in the English case of Bogue vs. Houlston. This precedent would doubtless be accepted by American courts, following Drone, who says : " The copyright protects the whole and all the parts and contents of a book : when the book comprises a number of inde- pendent compositions, each of the latter is as fully protected as the whole." The practice of some publishers in copyrighting a magazine and also specific articles or engravings, seems, there- fore, a work of supererogation. On the other hand, copyright cannot extend to any part of a book not subject in itself to copyright, as a part written by a foreigner. The general copyright is not, however, vitiated as to copyrightable portions by its seeming to cover non-copyright- able portions, as was held by Lord Kenyon in Cary vs. Longman. But when copyright is claimed on a work partly composed of uncopy- rightable matter the courts may require the claimant on interrogatories to designate which parts are and which are not original. " If the parts cannot be separated," says Drone, "it would seem that copyright will not vest in any of it." A copyright owner cannot prevent another person from publishing the matter contained in his book, if invented or collected independently, or from making "fair use " of its contents. Two map-makers or cataloguers, collecting accurate- ly and completely at first hand the same data, would naturally make the same map or cata- logue, and each would equally be entitled to copyright. It has even been held that the col- lected material might be used by a second com- piler as a guide in a second compilation, if sub- jected to original verification, as in the case of a street directory. In this respect, copyright law differs from patent law, where a first use bars others from the same field. But under the general rule as to " fair use," the great propor- tion of copyright perplexities are to be found — relating to compilation, abridgment, translation, quotation, and dramatization. Such cases are usually decided on the individual matters of fact in each case. In respect to abridgments and translations, the courts have held to precedents which the best writers, such as Curtis, Drone and Cop- inger, declare to be contradictory to the true principles of copyright law. In 1740 Lord Hard- wicke, deciding against a mere reprint, " color- ably shortened only," of Sir Matthew Hale's "Pleas of the Crown," declared that he would not restrain "a real and fair abridgment," and in 1774 Lord-Chancellor Apsley, after consul- tation with Blackstone, held that an abridgment of Hawkesworth's "Voyages," involving under- standing and skill, was not plagiarism or a copy- right wrong, but "an allowable and meritorious work." In the leading American case of Story's "Commentaries," Justice McLean, while expressing his own opinion that " an abridgment, if fairly made, contains the prin- ciple of the original work, and this constitutes its value," added, " But a contrary doctrine has long been established in England . . . and in this country the same doctrine has prevailed. I am, therefore, bound by precedent, and I yield to it, in this instance, more as a principle of law than a rule of reason or justice." Sim- ilarly, in Lawrence vs. Dana, in 1869, Justice 12 COPYRIGHT. Clifford declared that " an abridgment ought to be regarded as an infringement . . but the opposite doctrine has been too long established to be considered open to controversy." In regard to translations, the only direct prec- edent is the American case of "Uncle Tom's Cabin," in 1853, in which Mrs. Stowe had copy- righted not only the original work, but a German translation which she had caused to be made ; Justice Grier held that she could not recover against another person who was issuing another German translation, since it was not "copies of her book." This case was previous to the stat ute permitting authors to reserve the right of translation. In regard to dramatization, the leading cases are English : it has been held that the mere copyrighting of a book cannot prevent dramati- zation, but that copyright of a work in dramatic form before its literary publication does prevent other dramatization of the literary work. It is not improbable that the prevailing senti- ment of the best authorities will ultimately over- throw the above precedents, but the law as to abridgments should be definitely amended, as proposed by the English commission, so that no abridgment of a copyright work can be pub- lished without the owner's consent. The prec- edents cited apply, of course, only to books copyrighted without reservation of rights ; in England the right of translation may be reserved under the international copyright provisions, notice being given on title page, and in America the Revised Statutes (Sec. 4952) enact that " au- thors may reserve the right to dramatize or to translate their own works," which is done, under the OfBcial Regulations, by notifying the Libra- rian of Congress of such reservation, for record, and by printing the words " Right of translation reserved" or "All rights reserved" below the copyright notice. There is no provision against any translation, abridgment, etc., of a book not copyrighted ; nor can any person do more, in any case, than copyright his own translation, abridgment, etc. He cannot prevent any other person making independent use of the original which he has used unless he is himself the owner of the original. The question of how much quotation is within the limits of "fair use'' is almost entirely a question of fact to be decided by the court in the individual case : the leading case hereafter will probably be that of the publishers of "Gor- don's memoirs" against the Pall Mall Gazette for undue quotation, now pending in Eng- land. The state of the law regarding titles is also somewhat confusing. There seems to be no copyright protection for the title of a 'aooV fer se, but it may be considered an essential part of the book. Judge Shepley held (1872) that "the right secured is the property in the literary com- position — the product of the mind and genius of the author — and not in the name or title given to it. The title does not necessarily involve any literary composition ; it may not be, and certain- ly the statute does not require that it should be, the product of the author's mind ... It is a mere appendage, which only identifies, and frequently does not in any way describe, the literary com- position itself ... If there were no piracy of the copyrighted book there would be no remedy . . . for the use of a title which could not be copyrighted independently of the book." The English rulings are to the effect that a title has no copyright protection except as part of a book, but that the use of a title to attract purchasers on the supposition that they are getting another book previously known by that title is a fraud punishable at common law. General titles can- not in any way be protected : the publishers of the " Post-OfEce Directory," England, and of " Irvmg's Works," America, were both defeated in attempts to prevent the use of those titles. Judge Curtis, in the N. Y. Superior Court, decided in 1874, in the case of a play, that " the use of the word ' Charity' as a designation for any work of art or literature cannot ordinarily be monopolized by any one person. " The specific title ' ' The Two Orphans" was, however, protected at common law in another case. In the case, also, of the specific title " Trial and Triumph," 187(1, Vice- Chancellor Malins enjoined quite another book under the same title, though the title was chosen in ignorance of the first book and in entire good faith. So, also, in the title " Splendid Misery,'' used by MissBraddon in 1879, the English judge was inclined to support the copyright claim of Mr. Hazlewood, who had used it in 1874, until it was shown that a third novelist had used it in 1801, so that it had become, in a measure, com- mon property. Titles are rather to be considered as trade- marks, which may be registered in the United States under Sees. 4937-4947 of the Revised Statutes and protected by the statutory penalties, or may be protected on general principles of equity. In the "Chatterbox" cases, 1884-85, COPYRIGHT. n Judge Wheeler's injunction restraining the use of this " name or word, or any name or word sub- stantially identical therewith," in or upon any juveniles of the general character of the English book of that name, rests on principles of trade- mark and not of copyright, but thus a measure of international copyright is indirectly secured. In the English case of " Belgravia' ' Lord Cairns also seemed to think that there could not be copyright In a single word, but this question is avoided by considering a title as a trade- mark. It was laid down, in the case of " Belgravia," that there can be no claim to protection for the title of an unpublished book, no matter what ex- penditure has been made or advertising done, and this holds in trade-mark as well as in copy- right law. " There is no such thing as property in a trade-mark as an abstract name," ruled Judge Shepley, 1872, for a trade-mark simply shows that certain goods "were manufactured by a certain person." Nor can an abandoned title, in the case of a periodical, be held against a person starting a new periodical of that name, providing it does not purport to be a continua- tion of the old, according to a French case quoted by English authorities. There can be no copyright in an immoral book, and Lord Eldon, in Southey vs. Sher- wood, carried this doctrine so far as to deny the common law right of an author in a non-inno- cent manuscript, because there could be no right to hold what there was no right to sell. His opinion, resulting in the wide sale of a book which the author desired to suppress, has been severely criticised by later authorities. There can be no copyright in blasphemous, seditious, or libellous books ; but though this rule was very strictly enforced by English judges a century ago, the later courts hesitate to rule strictly on this point, lest the rule be perverted to sectari- anism or despotism. There can be no copyright in books involving fraud, as those which spuri- ously obtain salable value by being represented to be the work of writers who did not write them, or to contain matter which they do not contain ; but this rule does not extend to books under assumed names or innocently pretending to be what they are not, as when Horace Wal- pole's " Castle of Otranto" was put forward as a translation from the Italian. There can be no statutory copyright in books not yet published, but simply projected, just as there can be no copyright in a title not representing any book. There is nothing in copyright law corresponding to the caveat in patent law. In regard to periodicals and books published in parts, as also in regard to encyclopaedias and other composite books, there are no specific stat- utory provisions in the United States, but they come under the general designation of books. Each issue of a magazine or other periodical must therefore be separately entered as though a separate book, although the title may be reg- istered as a trade-mark once for all. All copy- rightable matter contained in the issue would then be copyrighted, as before noted. It seems probable that even a daily newspaper could thus be copyrighted day by day at a cost of $365 per year, so as to protect all its original material of substantial literary value. A daily Price-List of the New York Cotton Exchange was so entered day by day for some time, but the question of maintaining such a copyright seems never to have been tested in court. The New York Sun copy- rights its Sunday cable letter separately. A specific act to protect news for twenty-four hours has been proposed in Congress, but never passed. A book, published in more than one volume or part, the portions not complete in themselves, is probably protected by copyright entry of the first part ; but, of course, all parts must be deposited in the Library of Congress. The statutes of Great Britain provide specifi- cally that a work published in parts or a period- ical may be fully protected by copyright entry of the first part, but the word "newspaper" does not occur In the definitions of the Act. When the London Times' s memoir of Beacons- field was reprinted as a penny pamphlet, the Times brought suit as a matter of common-law right, but the judge held that a newspaper was copyrightable under the statute, and therefore that a couimon-law suit could not hold. It was held by Mr. Justice Molesworth, in Melbourne, Australia, that a newspaper proprietor had copy- right in special news telegrams, and another paper was enjoined from using them. Lectures are protected in England by statu- tory provision, provided the lecturer gives no- tice to two justices at the place of reading that he reserves his rights. There is no statutory provision in this country, but the courts seem disposed to protect a lecturer on the common law ground that the lecture read is not published by reading, and can be controlled as a manuscript. Newspapers have, however, in practice freely re- published lectures. Probably, when this Is done 14 COPYRIGHT. with consent of the author, he loses copyright, on the ground that non-copyrighted articles in a non copyrighted periodical cannot have protec- tion ; but if done without his consent, the publi- cation by another party cannot deprive him of his rights. It is suggested that the law should permit free report without vitiating book copy- right, unless the lecturer forbids such report pre- ceding his lecture. The general rules as to books govern the other articles of publication mentioned in the Revised Statutes, but it should- be noted that in the case of dramatic and musical compositions, in addition to copyright covering publication in print, there is " playright, " covering perform- ance. This rests partly upon principles of com- mon law and partly upon the statute ; it opens a wide field, into which this summary will not enter. VI. THE OWNERSHIP AND DURATION OF COPYRIGHT. The English law secures copyright to an au- thor or his assigns ; the United States Constitu- tion mentions " authors and inventors," and the Revised Statutes name " any citizen of the United States or resident therein, who shall be the author, inventor, designer, or proprietor of any kind, and the executors, administrators, or as- signs ot any such person" as the persons in whom copyright may lodge. The Librarian of Con- gress accordingly issues copyright certificates for books as to an " auti.or ''or " proprietor " only, assuming usually that an editor is the " author " and a publisher the " proprietor," and never go- ing behind the claim set forth in the application. The author of a book is the person primarily entitled to copyright. He may sell or otherwise transfer his production before it is copyrighted, in which case the new proprietor obtains all the common-law rights of property, both in the manuscript and its publication, including the right to copyright. This common-law right, including the right to copyright, may extend, Mr. Drone argues, to the finder of an unpub- lished manuscript, provided no one successfully disputes his ownership of his find, if the manu- script be copyrightable ; but there are no deci- sions on this point. Or a copyright may be taken out by another person (as the publisher of the bookl, impliedly in trust for the author, as is a usual custom among American publishers. The proprietor is defined to mean " the repre- sentative of an artist or author who might him- self obtain copyright." The copyright officer makes no inquiry into the right of the claimant, and that question, in any of its bearings, must be settled by the courts. When one person is employed by another to prepare a book, or an article which is part of a book, the authorship may inhere in the employer, if the design of the work is so far his as to make him the virtual creator and the actual writer a dep- uty merely ; but the courts have held that he is not an author who "merely suggests the subject, and has no share in the design or execution of the work." In any case, however, the proprie- tary right, including the right to secure copy- right, depends upon the contract, implied or ex- press, between employer and employed, and the courts will decide this according to the com- mon law of contracts. In the case of a book " with illustrations by John Leech," where Leech retained the copyright of the designs, though the publishers owned the wood on which he had drawn them, an English court held to a dis- tinction between the copyright and the right to the material, and directed the publishers to waive their lesser right and surrender the cuts, in view of the circumstances of the contract. Most of the cases arising as to ownership are in fact issues at common property law and not at copyright law, (as the American case in which Mr. Clemens vainly sought to restrain the use of his name, " Mark Twain," in a collection of his uncopyrighted papers, the court holding that whoever has a right to publish has a right to state authorship, though an author can restrain from the publication over his name of things he did not write,) and this summary does not un- dertake to present the laws of contract between author and publisher. The copyright is in the author, unless he has consented to part with it ; but this consent may be implied in the cir- cumstances of employment. The particular ap- plication of this general principle must be deter- mined by the facts in each case. When a salaried law reporter had been em- t6 COP y RIGHT. ployed by the State of New York under a law that the copyright of the Reports should vest in the State, Judge Nelson held as valid an entry by the Secretary of State, " in trust for the State of New York," though no formal assignment had been made. When, as in the case of a cyclopae- dia, many persons are employed at the offices of an employer, using his materials and facili- ties, and especially if on salary, the courts would undoubtedly uphold his full proprietorship in their work. Where outside persons contributed special articles, the presumption would probably be that the ownership of the copyright, for that special publication, vested in the employer, but that neither he, without the author's consent, nor the author, without his consent, could publish the article in other competing shape. There may be joint authorship in a work of common design, in which case the joint authors will be- come owners in common of the undivided prop- erty ; but mere alterations or work on specific parts could not justify claim to more than such alterations or pans. No person, though a citizen, can obtain copyright in work of which any but a citizen or resident is the author, though the lat- ter be in his employ. But it seems that a for- eigner may enter copyright in the work of a citi- zen or resident author — it being foreign author- ship, not ownership, which the law refuses to protect, though this point has not been judicially determined. A resident, under the American decisions, is a person who intends to reside permanently in this country. It is decided by the intention of the resident. A person who is residing here without intention of permanence cannot maintain copyright. For English copyright, on the con- trary, a person temporarily residing in Her Majesty's dominions is considered a resident. The assignment of copyright opens vexed questions. The Revised Statutes provide for penalties against any one who shall print, pub- lish, or import a copyrighted book," without the consent of the proprietor of the copyright first obtained in writing, signed in presence of two or more witnesses," as also against any one who shall sell or expose for sale such issue. They also provide that " copyrights shall be assign- able in law, by any instrument of writing, and such assignment shall be recorded in the oflSce of the Librarian of Congress within sixty days after its execution ; in default of which it shall be void against any subsequent purchaser or mortgagee for a valuable consideration, without notice." The section first cited follows the phrase- ology of the early English statute, under which the English courts have held that assignments mast be in writing, attested by two witnesses ; the later statute of Victoria modifies this lan- guage, and the later English decisions, as to whether an assignment must be in writing, are confusing, if not contradictory. The section providing for the record of assignment somewhat patterns the method of registration of assignment provided by the English statute, but there left optional. The American law on this point has not been judicially construed ; it seems probable that a written transfer would be required, but possibly not its attestation by two witnesses. The safe method of transfer, both in England and this country, is by writing, under attest of two witnesses, duly recorded in the copyright office. But assignment of common-law rights (as in an unpublished manuscript) may doubtless be by word of mouth. A proprietor can probably as- sign part of his copyright, as the right to drama- tize ; he can probably assign his rights for a por- tion of the term of copyright, or for another country, but probably not for a limited portion (as a particular State) of this country. But none of these points are judicially determined. Only an author, his widow, or children can obtain a re- newal, but this renewal right can probably be assigned. It is possible that an author who as- signs in specific words his entire rights bars him- self as well as his assignee from the benefit of renewal. The duration of all copyrights in this country is uniformly twenty-eight years, dating from the time of recording the title, with a renewal of fourteen years, securable only by the author, or, if he be dead at the expiration of the term, by his widow or children. No other heirs or persons can renew. In England the term of book copy- right is the life-time of the author and seven years after his death, or forty-two years from first publication, whichever is the longer. The copy- right in other articles varies according to the specific law. The Copyright Commission pro- pose, for all copyright articles as well as books, a term of life and thirty years after the author's death, according to the German fashion, or in case of anonymous and posthumous books and encyclopaedias, thirty years from the date of de- posit in the British Museum, an anonymous author to have the right during the thirty years to obtain the full term by publishing an edition with his name. COPYRIGHT. 17 The English law contains a specific provision that in the case of articles in periodicals (but not in an encyclopaedia) the right to publish in sepa- rate form shall revert to an author after twenty- eight years ; the Commission purposes a term of three years, during which time also the author as well as the general owner may bring suit against piracy. No specific provision on this point ex- ists in this country. VII. THE ENTRY AND PROTECTION OF COPYRIGHTS. In the United States the Revised Statutes and the official " Directions for securing copyright" promulgated thereunder by the Librarian of Con- gress, prescribe exactly the method of entering copyright, and unless the statute is precisely com- plied with, the copyright is not valid. Said Mr. Justice Sawyer, in Parkinson vs. Laselle : " There is no possible room for construction here. The statute says no right shall attach until these acts have been performed ; and the court cannot say, in the face of this express negative provision, that a right shall attach unless they are performed. Until the performance as prescribed, there is no right acquired under the statute that can be vio- lated." And in the case of the play " Shaugh- raun," Boucicault vs. Hart, in 1875, Mr. Justice Hunt held, as regards copyrights in general : ' The work must be published within a reason- able time after the filing of the title-page, and two copies be delivered to the Librarian. These two acts are by the statute made necessary to be performed, and we can no more take it upon our- selves to say that the latter is not an indispens- able requisite to a copyright than we can say it of the former. " The Supreme Court laid down this general doctrine in Wheaton vs. Peters, in reference to the statutes of 1790 and 1802, and the later statutes are most explicit on this point. In the same case of Wheaton vs. Peters, Mr. Justice McLean, in delivering the judgment of the Supreme Court, held that while the right " accrues,'' so that it may be protected in chan- cery, on the recording of the title of a book, it must be perfected by complying with the other requisites before a suit at law for violation of copyright can be maintained. Under the present laws, the statutory requisites are : I. The delivery at the oflSce of the Librarian of Congress, or deposit in the mails to his ad- dress, before publication, of a printed copy of title, or, in the case of a painting, etc., of a descrip- tion of the same. Any postmaster is required, if requested, to receipt for such title or descrip- tion. No affidavit or form of application is pre- scribed ; but the applicant should give his full name and address, and state whether he claims copyright as author, designer, or proprietor. With each application should be sent one dollar, of which fifty cents is for recording the entry and fifty cents for the certificate of entry which the Librarian returns by mail. If the certificate is not desired at this time, only fifty cents need be sent. "The printed title required may be a copy of the title-page of such publications as have title- pages. In other cases, the title must be printed expressly for copyright entry, with name of claimant of copyright. The style of type is im- material, and the print of a type-writer will be accepted. But a separate title is required for each entry, and each title must be printed on paper as large as comniercial note. The title of a periodical must include the date and number." 2. The insertion, in every copy published, on the title-page or page following, in the case of a book, or the inscription on the face or mounting of other articles, of the notice, "Entered ac- cording to Act of Congress, in the year .... by .... in the office of the Librarian of Con- gress at Washington," or of the short form, "Copyright, 18 . . , by . . ." This exact phraseology and order of words must be fol- lowed, and it has been held that any inaccuracy in the name of the copyright proprietor (as in the English case of Sampson Low, Son & Co., COP YRIGHT. vs. Routledge, by Vice-Chancellor Kindersley) or in ihe date of the entry (as in the American case of Baker vs. Taylor, when 1847 was put for 1846) makes the copyright invalid. A later de- cision of an American'court held, however, that where a copyright notice gave the year 1866, while the true date was 1867, there was no harm done to the public, because a. year of the copy- right (which really ended in 1895 instead of 1894) was given to the public, whereas in the pre- vious case an additional year was claimed. This decision, however, is not a safe precedent. A microscopic objection that N. Sarony (instead of Napoleon Sarony) was not a name was promptly quashed. The original copyright entry must appear in every reprint of the first edition ; and it would seem that this entry should also appear in every new edition newly copyrighted, as well as the new notice, so long as it is desired to protect the matter contained in the old edition. But the decision of Justice Clifford, in Lawrence vs. Dana, rules this to be superfluous. The stat- ute does not expressly prescribe that the notice shall appear in successive volumes after a first, and in Dwight vs. Appleton, 1840, it was held that this was not necessary ; but it is safer to print in all, especially if issued at different dates. The official " Directions" indeed prescribe that a separate copyright is to be taken out for each volume ; but this seems to be unsettled in the law, although it has been the general practice from the beginning. Theliw imposes a penalty of $100 upon any person who shall use the copyright notice without obtaining copyright. 3. The deposit, within ten days after publica- tion, of two copies of the best edition of each book or other article, or, in the case of a paint- ing, etc., within ten days after completion, of a photograph of the same (at least of cabinet size), with the Librarian of Congress or in the mails to his address. It is safer to address "To the Librarian of Congress" than to that officer by his personal name. The Librarian furnishes " free penalty labels" fcr mailing deposit copies, on application, and any postmaster is required, if requested, to receipt for such copies. -The Libra- rian furnishes blank receipts fur publications, if desired. The Librarian of Congress may re- cover a penalty of $25, by an action of debt, for omission to make such deposit. Under the laws existing in 1843, the Attorney-General held that if a book were deposited after the statutory time, copyright would avail nevertheless from the date of such deposit ; but the judicial interpretations of the existing law hold that a copyright is not valid if deposit is not made within the ten days. The nature of this requirement is apt to be over- looked. The Librarian of Congress has been in the habit of sending out a reminder after the expiration of the ten days ; but response to this would not help the copyright owner. The vol- ume may be sent before publication, for instance, with the title-page at the time of entry. The law also requires the deposit of " a copy of every sub- sequent edition wherein any substantial changes shall be made," but there is no decision as to whether omission to do this would in any way invalidate the original copyright. Publication consists in publicly offering for sale, or gratuitously circulating, from which act the ten days would count. A consignment of an edition, in which sale before a certain time is prohibited, is not publication, but a consign- ment which is practically a sale is, for " a sale naturally imports publication." It is not certain whether first publication abroad defeats copy- right here. The official "Directions" declare that "the time within which any work copy- righted may be issued from the press is not limited by any law or regulation, but depends upon the discretion of the proprietor ;" but Jus- tice Hunt held, as before quoted, that it must be " within a reasonable time." The official " Di- rections," say that "" a copyright may be secured for a projected work as well as for a completed one," — but this refers, of course, to entering the title of books about to be published, and is not meant to contravene the legal decisions that there can be no copyright in works not in being. The Copyright Office is required by law to give copyright certificates for fifty cents each, and for the same fee it furnishes information as to a given copyright to any person. The origi- nal application and printed title are filed away together, after the title has been copied into one of the prepared blank books known as the "Copyright Record," in which there is a con- tinuous numbering for the year, and which becomes the main record. From this Index- cards are made, and kept in an alphabetic card- catalogue, giving the name of the book, the author, and the publisher, so that information can be obtained at once. This card- catalogue is not accessible to the public, but its information is furnished on request. In each certificate of copyright the title and claimant of copyright are entered upon a prepared blank, and the entries 20 COPYRIGHT. in the Record book are fac similes of the certifi- cates given. The date of deposit of volumes is given in the Record book, and also in the certifi- cate when the title and volume are sent at one time. To procure the fourteen years' renewal beyond the original twenty-eight years, " the author, in- ventor, or designer, if he be still living and a citi- zen of the United States or resident therein, or his widow or children, if he be dead," must, " within six months before the expiration of the first term," record the title or description a second time, and comply " with all other regula- tions in regard to original copyrights." The fees are the same as for original copyrights "Applications for renewal," according to the ofiScial "Directions," "must be accompanied by explicit statement of ownership, in the case of the author, or of relationship, in the case of his heirs, and must state definitely the date and place of entry of the original copyright. Within two months from the date of said renewal the renewer must publish a copy of the record " in one or more newspapers printed in the United States, for the space of four weeks. ' ' An assignee cannot obtain a renewal, although an author may contract with the assignee to take out and to con- vey to him the benefit of a renewal ; he may also contract not to renew, and so bar his own right. An assignment, made by any Instrument of writing, " shall be recorded in the office of the Librarian of Congress within sixty days after its execution ; in default of which," says the statute, " it shall be void as against any subse- quent purchaser or mortgagee for -a. valuable consideration, without notice.'' The fee for this record and certificate is $i, and for a certified copy of any record of assignment $i. 'V\ic penalties a.-a& procedure va. cas^% under the copyright law are specifically determined by statute. The penalty for false use of the copy- right notice is $ioo, recoverable one half for the person who shall sue for such penalty, and one half to the use of the United States. The pen- alty for printing, publishing or importing, or knowingly selling or exposing for sale unlaw- ful copies of any book whose title is duly re- corded, without consent 5f the proprietor " first obtained in writing, signed in presence of two or more witnesses," is forfeiture of all copies to the proprietor, and such damages as may be recovered in a civil action by such proprietor in any court of competent jurisdiction. An Eng- lish decision holds that an importer is not inno- cent because he does not know that an importa- tion includes copyright matter ; and the wording of our law implies the same, though an American decision held that' a partner or employer is not chargeable with statute penalties for acts done without his knowledge by a partner or agent. The penalty against an Infringer in the case of all other copyright articles, except books and dra- matic compositions, is forfeiture to the proprietor of all plates on which the article shall be copied, and every sheet thereof, and $i for every sheet thereof ; or, in the case of a painting, statue or statuary, $io for every copy thereof found in his possession — one half to go to the proprietor and the other half to the use of the United States. The penalty for infringement of " play-right" is damages to be assessed by the court, at not less than $100 for the first and $50 each for subsequent performances. A person who unlawfully prints a manuscript is liable to the proprietor " for all damages." Any action must be commenced within two years after the cause has arisen. The general issue may be pleaded, and special matter given in evidence. The Circuit and District Courts having circuit jurisdiction may grant injunctions for copy- right wrongs upon bill in equity. The Circuit Courts have jurisdiction " of all suits at law or in equity arising under the patent or copyright laws of the United States," with writ of error or appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States. VIII. STATUTORY COPYRIGHT IN OTHER COUNTRIES. Copyright in America has been so much modelled on English statutes, decisions, and precedents, that previous papers have presented many of the points of copyright law in the United Kingdom. There are two essential points of difference, however, between the British and American copyright systems. Copyright there depends essentially upon first publication, not upon citizenship ; and registration and de- posit, which are here a sine quA non, are there only necessary previous to, and as a basis for, an infringement suit. A book first published in the United Kingdom (England, Scotland, Wales, and Ireland) is ipso facto copyright throughout Her Majesty's Dominions, whether it be from a natural born or naturalized subject of the Queen, wherever resident ; or from a person who is at the time of publication on British soil, colonies included, and so "temporarily a subject of the crown — bound by, subject to, and entitled to the benefit of the laws," even if he made a journey for this express purpose ; or, probably but not certainly, by an alien friend not resident in the United Kingdom nor in a country with which there is a. copyright treaty. Under the statute of Anne, it was decided by the Law Lords, in the case of Boosey vs. Jefferys (overruling Jefferys vs. Boosey), that a person not a British subject or resident was not entitled to copyright because of first publication in England, but the statute of 5 and 6 Victoria was construed to alter this. In the ruling case under the last-named statute, Routledge vs. Low (on appeal from Low vs. Routledge), Lords Cairns and Westbury laid down explicitly that first publication was the single necessity, and that copyright was not strengthened by residence ; but Lord Cran worth objected and Lord Chelmsford doubted whether this was good law. It is because of this doubt that American authors have been accustomed to make a day's stay in Montreal on the date of English publication of their books — possibly a wise precaution, though probably unnecessary. It was unanimously held, in the case last cited, that to acquire copyright throughout the British Dominions the work must be pub- lished within the United Kingdom ; it is prob- able, but uncertain, that first publication in one of the colonies, for instance, confines copyright to that colony under its local law alone. Simul- taneous publication elsewhere does not, how- ever, vitiate British copyright. If a portion of a work only be first published in the United Kingdom, that portion is protected and only the other parts of the book can be reprinted without permission. The practical efltect of all this is to give an international copyright under provisions of the domestic law. Registration in England is made at Stationers' Hall, London ; the requirement should certify that the applicant is the proprietor of the copy- right of the book, should give accurately the title, name of publisher, and place of publication, name and place of abode of the proprietor of the copyright, and date of first publication ; and should be dated, signed, and witnessed. The fee is five shillings ($1.25) for registration, and five shillings for certificate of entry. Assign- ments are also to be recorded— the fee being also five shillings. Blank forms are furnished by the Stationers' Company. No suit can be brought for the piracy of a book until this regis- tration is made, but after registration the copy- right proprietor may obtain penalties for piracy 22 COPYRIGHT. committed before registration — an anomaly which the Copyright Commission propose to correct by confining penalties to acts committed after registration. The law also requires the deposit of one copy of the best edition with the British Museum, within one month if published in London, three months if elsewhere in the Kingdom, twelve months if elsewhere in the British Dominions ; and the delivery to the Sta- tioners' Company, if demanded in writing within twelve months from publication, of one copy of the edition of which the largest number is printed, for each of four designated libraries, at Oxford, Cambridge, Edinburgh, and Dublin. Neglect to deposit does not vitiate the copyright, but in- volves a penalty of five pounds. The British statute, unlike the American, does not require any notice of copyright registration to appear in the work, proceeding, apparently, upon the pre- sumption that all publications are registered, without notice. There is also a registry for paintings, draw- ings, and photographs kept at Stationers' Hall, and on these no suits can be brought for acts committed prior to registration. In other arti- cles, as drama, no registry is required. The terms and conditions for the various articles other than books subject to copyright vary greatly under the several acts protecting them. The universities have perpetual copyright in works given to them outright, so long as these are printed by their own presses for their sole benefit and advantage. The Crown seems to have the right to grant patents to the Crown printers for the exclusive printing of the author- ized version of the Bible, of the Book of Com- mon Prayer, and probably of Acts of Parlia- ment. To prevent suppression of books, the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, on com- plaint that a copyright proprietor, after the death of an author, withholds a work from republica- tion, are empowered to authorize the complain- ant to issue it, under conditions within their dis- cretion. Copyright in Canada is a perplexity uf per- plexities, because it is regulated by two sets of statutes — the Imperial, applicable to the whole British Empire, and the Canadian, applicable to the Dominion of Canada alone. A work copy- righted in the United Kingdom is copyright in Canada, but a Canadian copyright holds only for Canada. The " Foreign Reprints act," passed by the British Parliament in 1847, authorized the suspension of that portion of the Imperial statute which forbade the importation of foreign reprints of English books into Canada. As a condition of the permission so granted, the Canadian Legislature passed a law subject- ing reprints so admitted to a customs duty of twelve and one half per cent, to be finally paid over to the British author. The returns were ridiculously small — only £lo%\ in the ten years ending in 1876. In 1875, the Dominion Legislat- ure passed a Copyright act, limited in its ap- plication, of course, to Canada, which after some delay was approved by the Queen. The English lawyers, however, thought it necessary to pass another Imperial act, by which it was provided that when English authors authorized the reprint- ing of their books for the Canadian market, such reprints (although not piracies) could not be im- ported into Great Britain. This law makes it possible to issue in Canada cheap reprints of English works without interfering with the more costly English editions. These laws, apparently so complex, do not con- flict. Each is goodj>ra tanto. The net result of the whole mass of combined legislation mayie summarized as follows : 1. The works of a British author cannot be reprinted in Canada without his permission, but, if he does not comply with the Canadian law, reprints may be imported into Canada from for- eign countries. 2. The works of a British author who complies with the Canadian law can neither be reprinted in, nor imported into, Canada without his per- mission. The circuitous way in which American authors are able to avail themselves of both these laws results from judicial interpretations of the Im- perial statute. Canada grants copyright for twenty-eight years to such as are bona fide residents of Canada, or who are citizens of any country which has an international copyright with the United King- dom. The condition essential is printing and publication in Canada. The plates may be made elsewhere, but the impressions must,be printed in Canada. Prior, or even simultaneous, publi- cation is not necessary. The copyright will not commence until publication and registration. The cases of serial publications are provided for, and under certain conditions a temporary pro- tection of a month is afforded to books passing through the press. As an instance of the operation of these laws, the case of " Prince and Pauper," by Mark COPYRIGHT. n Twain, may be cited. Tliis boolc is copyrighted in England — therefore it cannot he prinled in Can- ada. But an edition can be and has been quietly printed out of Canada and imported and sold freely in Canada. The French copyright system is the most lib- eral in existence. All copyrights, whether for literary, dramatic, musical, or artistic worlcs, now extend fifty years beyond an author's death (law of 1866) ; the State has copyright in per- petuity over worlds published by its order or by its agents, but in a private copyright lapsing to the State for lack of heirs, the exclusive right is extinguished. To obtain a right of action in cases of piracy, the law requires the deposit of two copies of a book at the Ministry of the Inte- rior at Paris (or at the Prefecture, if in the depart- ments), for which a receipt is given. The decree of March, 1852, still in force, protects works of foreigners published abroad from piracy on French territory, on the sole condition of deposit as above, and any foreigner who publishes in France is on the same footing as a French author. Copyright throughout the German Empire ex- tends thirty years beyond an author's death— a period which the British Copyright Commission propose to adopt. Works of academies, etc., and anonymous works are protected for thirty years from date of publication ; but an author by disclosing and registering his name can obtain copyright on an anonymous booTc for the full term. On -a joint work the thirty years counts from the death of the last survivor. An author may reserve rights of translation by so announc- ing on his title-page, provided an authorized translation be commenced within one and finish- ed within three years. Translations are protected as though original books. Piracy is punished by forfeiture, damages, and fine or imprisonment. The law provides for expert associations in each German State, nominated by the government, to advise the judges. Proceedings must be begun within three years from the act of piracy and within three months of its coming to the knowl- edge of the aggrieved party. A general registry book is kept at Leipzig, open to public in- spection, for every entry in or extract from which fifteen sgr. (about thirty-six cents) is charged, and the entry is printed in the Borsen- blatt, at the expense of the copyright proprietor. The law protects all works of native authors, whether published in or out of the German Em- pire, and works by a foreigner published by a firm having its place of business or a branch oflice within the German Empire. In both Holland and Belgium copyright in books has been for the author's life and twenty years after, "but only on works printed and pub- lished within the country, and of which three copies, signed by printer and publisher, have been deposited with the communal authorities. New and more liberal systems are under consid- eration in both countries. Previous to the French Revolution Holland acknowledged the author's right as a perpetual one. Norway grants copyright for life and fifty years, and formerly required no registration. But by a new law of June 20, 1882, a literary register was established at the University in Christiania, in which register must be entered all claims of copyright — literary and artistic — a fee of one crown (about twenty-seven cents) being charged for each entry. And of each new work and new edition so entered, one copy of the work must be deposited in the University Li- brary at the time of publication ; and in addition the law demands that of each book, print, litho- graph, wood-cut, and musical composition, published during the year, a complete and per- fect copy must be sent, not later than the end of January of the year next following, to the Uni- versity Library. The printer is responsible for this last deposit, and a failure to deposit is sub- ject to fine of from two to fifty crowns for each work. But for such deposits a claim for pay- ment may be made when a work costs over ten crowns (12.68). Spain grants copyright for life and eighty years thereafter, — publishers of anonymous and pseudonymous works having the same rights as authors until proof of the real author is made, — providing entry is made in the Register of Intel- lectual Property within one year and two copies deposited. In default of registry a work be- comes public property. Portugal grants copy- right for life and thirty years ; six copies must be deposited at the Lisbon Library. Italy grants full copyright for life or forty years, whichever is longer. After forty years from first publication, or. If the author live be- yond that date, after his death, a second term of forty years begins, in which any person, on duly declaring his intention, may republish a work, on condition of paying five per cent royalty to the copyright proprietor. The State may expro- priate any work after the death of an author on paying to the proprietor a compensation named H COPYRIGHT. by three experts. Government and society pub- lications are copyrighted only for twenty years. An author may reserve rights of translation for ten years. Three copies must be deposited, and a declaration maide of reservation of rights ; these declarations are published for each six months in the Official Gazette. Hayti, within a year, has adopted a copyright law with some unusual features. An author holds exclusive right during life ; the widow through her life ; the children for twenty years further, or other heirs, if there are no children surviving, for ten years. Unauthorized reprints are confiscated on the complaint of the proprie- tor of the copyright ; and the author recovers from the reprinter the price of a thousand, or from a bookseller of two hundred copies, reck- oned at the retail price of the author's edition. Copyright also exists in Austria-Hungary — for life and thirty years after, no registry or deposit being required ; Sweden, formerly perpetual, now for life and fifty years, no registration ; Denmark, for life and thirty years, no registra- tion or deposit ; Switzerland, for life or thirty years ; Russia, for life and fifty years, registra- tion but not deposit being required, with com- plicated provisions as to new editions ; Turkey, for forty years, or twenty for translations ; Greece, for fifteen years, subject to royal extension ; Mexico, which has perpetual lit- erary copyright, registration and deposit being obligatory ; Venezuela, for life and fourteen years, or deposit and registration ; Chili, for life and five years ; Brazil, for life and ten years ; Japan, for thirty years, with extension to forty-five. IX. INTERNATIONAL COPYRIGHT IN EUROPE. With the growth of civilization, the practice of protecting in all countries the property of the citizen of any one has also grown, umil it is now a, generally recognized principle. This principle, applied to literary property, has re- sulted in international copyright among most civilized nations. The United States remains a not honorable exception. The first provision for international copyright was made by Prussia m 1836, by a law which provided that any country might secure copy- right for its authors in Prussia on granting re- ciprocal privileges. A copyright convention was concluded between the members of the Ger- man Confederation in 1837. England followed, in 1838, with the Act i and 2 Victoria, an " Act for securing to authors, in certain cases, the benefit of international copyright," which em- powered the Queen, by an Order in Council, to direct that the author of a book first published in a foreign country should have copyright in the United Kingdom, on certain conditions, provid- ing that country conferred similar privileges on English authors. The act of 1844 (7 and 8 Vic- toria) extended this privilege to prints, sculpt- ure, and other works of art, and provided for international playright. It expressly denied the privilege, however, to translations of foreign works, and it was not until 1852 (act of 15 and 16 Victoria) that provision was fully made for translations and dramatic compositions, the lat- ter with the proviso that " fair imitations or adaptations' ' of foreign plays or music might be made. The latest act on international copyright, that of 1875 (38 Victoria), repealed this proviso, and authorized the Queen, by Orders in Council, to protect foreign plays against this kind of piracy. The domestic copyright acts, however, provide, on the condition of first publication in the United Kingdom, a practical measure of in- ternational copyright. Great Britain has copy- right treaties with Germany (1846-55, those with Prussia and the minor States extended to the Empire, but apparently not including WUrtem- berg and Bavaria), France (1851), Belgium (1854), Spain (1857), and Italy (i86o, that with Sardinia extended to the Kingdom). Copyright by treaty, under approval of Orders in Council, for works first published in other, countries, is restricted to the terms provided by British domestic law for the several copyright articles, but may vary within these terms accord- ing to the treaty with each country. As a con- dition of copyright, each work musi be regis- tered, and a copy of the first edition and of every subsequent edition containing additions or alterations deposited, at Stationers' Hall, for transmission within a month to the Brinish Museum. The time and place of first publica- tion abroad must be included in the registry ; the fee for registration is one shilling only. Translations are protected for five years, on the additional conditions that the original shall have been registered and deposited in the one country within three months after first publica- tion in the other ; that the author notify his re- servation on the title-page of the original, and that the authorized translation shall begin to appear within one year, and be completed with- in three years, from the registration and deposit. The several treaties of Her Majesty with the powers above-named are in almost identical language, and grant the full terms provided by the British domestic laws. The treaties gen- 26 COPYRIGHT. erally include a proviso that duties on books, etc. , imported into the treaty country shall not be above a stated sum. In the case of France there is to be no duty either way. The British Copyright Commission have pro- posed that registration and deposit in London shall not be necessary, but that a copy of entry in any foreign register, attested by a British consular agent, shall be prima facie evidence of title ; and that the right to translate shall in any case abide with the author for three years, and if within that time an authorized translation be published, it shall be copyright for ten years. France, by the decree of 1852, protects works published abroad without regard to reciprocity, providing the formalities of deposit are complied with previous to a suit for infringement ; but it also has treaties with several nations. In none of them, except those with England and Spain, is deposit required in the foreign country, and four of the countries which require registration permit that it shall be performed at their lega- tions in Paris. A curious outcome results from the wording of the Anglo-French treaty taken in connection with French law. Any foreign work being en- titled by the latter to copyright on publication and deposit in France, and British protection being assured by treaty to all works copyrighted In France and properly registered and deposited in England, it seems to follow that an American, for instance, by obtaining French copyright under French law can obtain English copyright under the Anglo-French treaty. This might hold in the case of books already published in America and not first published in England. Germany extends copyright privileges to for- eign works issued by publishers having a place of business or branch ofBce in Germany, without regard to reciprocity. Otherwise the rights of foreign authors are regulated by the several treaties in force with other nations. In Belgium and Holland the law protecting works published and printed in the country, on deposit of certified copies, seems to cover books by foreign authors. Belgium has definite trea- ties with Great Britain, France, Germany, Hol- land, Spain, Portugal, Italy, Switzerland, and Russia, guaranteeing to their citizens the rights of Belgian subjects, with reciprocal provisions. The law proposed extends its privileges alike to native and foreign authors, but to the latter for no longer than the term of copyright in their country, In Norway and Sweden the domestic law provides for its extension to citizens of other countries, on condition of reciprocity. In Sweden every anonymous or pseudonymous book Is considered as of Swedish authorship in default of proof to the contrary. Spain bases international copyright on " com- plete reciprocity between the two contracting powers," each of which shall treat the other as "the most favored nation," and does not require the fulfilling of any formality. It thus extends the protection of Its domestic law to subjects of any foreign State whose law recognizes the right of intellectual property, and it has treaties with Great Britain, France, Bel- gium, Holland, Portugal, and Italy. Under Spanish law, it is stated, the foreign proprietor can exercise his right of property in Spain in ac- cordance with the laws of his own country. Portugal gives protection to foreigners on condition of reciprocity. Italy, Austria, and Russia have copyright treaties with other coun- tries. Greece protects foreigners for fifteen years, on condition of reciprocity. Switzerland offers treaty protection to citizens of "foreign States who exercise reciprocity, and who by moderate duties on the production of Swiss literature and art facilitate their sale ;" but such treaties are binding only in the cantons which agree to them. At the time of the Universal Exposition in Paris in 1878, the French Sociit^ des Gens de Let- tres issued invitations for an International Lit- erary Congress, which was held in Paris, under the presidency of Victor Hugo, commencing June 4, 1878. From this came the International Literary Association, which held subsequent Congresses at London in 1879, at Lisbon in 1880, at Vienna in 1881, at Rome in 1882, at Amster- dam in 1883, at Brussels in 1884, and at Antwerp in 1885, at which the extension of international copyright was discussed and advocated. The Congress at Antwerp, in 1885, ratified the following proposition : " The author's right in his work constitutes an Inherent right of property. The law docs not create, but merely regulates it." Partly at the initiation of this Association, and at the invitation of the Swiss Government, semi- ofBcial conferences of representatives of the several nations were held at Berne in Septem- ber, 1883, and September, 1884. At the first of these, the following draft, submitted by the In- ternational Literary Association, was substan- COPYRIGHT. i1 tially adopted as the basis for a general conven- tion of civilized nations : I. The authors of literary or artistic works published, represented, or executed in one of the contracting States, shall enjoy, upon the sole condition of accomplishing the formalities required by the laws of that State, the same rights for the protection of ^}ieir works in the other States of the Union, whatever the nationality of the authors may be, as are enjoyed by natives of the States. £. The term literary or artistic works comprises books, pamphlets, and all other writings ; dramatic and dramat- ico-musical works ; musical compositions, with or without words, and arrangements of music ; drawings, paintings, sculptures, engravings, lithographs, maps, plans, scientific sketches, and generally all other literary, artistic, and scientific works whatsoever, which may be published by any system of impression or reproduction whatsoever. 3. The rights of authors extend to manuscript or unpub- lished works. 4. The legal representative^ and assignees of authors shall enjoy in all respects the same rights as are awarded by this convention to authors themselves. 5. The subjects of one of tjie contracting Slates shall enjoy in all the other States of t^e Union during; the subsist- ence of their rights in their original works the exclusive right of translation. This right comprises the right of publication, representation, or execution. 6. Authorized translations are protected in the same manner as original works. When the translation is of a work which has become public property, the translator cannot prevent the work from being translated by others. 7. In the case of the infringement of the above provisions, the courts having jurisdiction will apply the laws enacted by their respective legislatures, just as if the infringement had been committed to the prejudice of a native. Adap- tation shall be considered piracy, and treated in the same manner. 8. This convention applies to all works that have not yet become public property in the country in which they were first published at the time of coming into force of the convention. 9. The States of th? Union reserve to themselves the right of entering into separate agreements among them- selves for the protection of literary or artistic works, pro- vided that such agreements are not contrary to any of the provisions of the present convention. 10. A Central International Office shall be established, at which shall be deposited by the Governments of the States of the Union the laws, decrees, and regulations af- fecting the rights of authors which have already been or shall hereafter be promulgated in any of the said Govern- ments. This office shall collect the laws, etc., and publish a periodical print in the French language, in which shall be contained all the documents and information necessary to be made known to the parties interested. At the 1884 Conference the draft was modified to the following : I. Authors placing themselves within the jurisdiction of the contracting countries will be afforded protection for their works, whether in print or manuscript, and will have all the advantages of the laws of the different nations em- braced in the Union. ss. These privileges will be dependent upon the carrying out of the conditions and formalities prescribed by the legislation of the author's native country, or of the country in which he chooses to first publish his work, such country being, of course, one of those included in the convention. 3. These stipulations apply alike to editors and authors of literary works, as well as to works of art published or created in any country of the Union. 4. Authors within the jurisdiction of the Union will enjoy in all the countries the exclusive rights of translation of their works during a period of ten years after publica- tion in any one country of the Union of an authorized translation. 5. It is proposed that it shall be made legal to publish extracts from works which have appeared in any country of the Union, provided that such publications are adapted for teaching or have a scientific character. The reciprocal publication of books composed of fragments of various authors will also be permitted. It will be an indispensable condition, however, that the source of such extracts shall at all times be acknowledged. 6. On the other hand, it will be unlawful to publish, without special permission of the holder of the copyright, any piece of music, in any collection of mu^c used in musical academies. 7. The rights of protection accorded to mu'^ical works wilt prohibit arrangements of music containing fragments from other composers, unless the consent of such composer be first obtained. This is to form the basis of a proposed Inter- national Copyright Union, similar to the Postal Union, and steps have already been taken in Great Britain to amend the English law to per- mit association with it. X. THE INTERNATIONAL COPYRIGHT MOVEMENT IN AMERICA. Simultaneously with the earliest legislation for international copyright among European states, there was a movement in the same direc- tion in the United States. In February, 1837, Henry Clay presented to the Senate a petition of British authors asking for copyright privileges in this country. It was referred to a select com- mittee, whose members were Clay, Webster, Buchanan, Preston, and Ewing, which reported favorably a bill for international copyright. The report took high ground in favor of the rights of authors : " That authors and inventors have, according to the practice among civilized nations, a prop- erty in the respective productions of their genius, is incontestable ; and that this property should be protected as effectually as any other property is, by law, follows as a legitimate consequence. Authors and inventors are among the greatest ■ benefactors of mankind. . . . It being established that literary property is entitled to legal protec- tion, it results that this protection ought to be afforded wherever the property is situated. . . . We should be all shocked if the law tolerated the least invasion of the rights of property, in the case of merchandise, whilst those that justly belong to the works of authors are exposed to daily violation, without the possibility of their invoking the aid of the laws." No action was taken on this report, nor on an invitation extended by Lord Palmerston the suc- ceeding year, 1838, for the co-operation of the American Government in an international copy- right arrangement. Mr. George P. Putnam, himself a publisher, revived the question in 1840, in a pamphlet pre- pared by him and by Dr. Francis Lieber, " An Argument in behalf of International Copyright," said to be the first publication on this subject in this country. In 1843 he procured the signa- tures of ninety-seven publishers, printers, and binders to a petition which was presented to Congress, setting forth that the absence of inter- national copyright was " alike injurious to the business of publishing and to the best interests of the people." A counter-memorial from Phil- adelphia objected that international copyright " would prevent the adaptation of English books to American wants." Mr. Dickens's tour in 1841 stimulated interest in this subject, and there were high hopes of some result. In 1853 Edward Everett, then Secretary of State, negotiated through the American Minister in London, John F. Crampton, a treaty provid- ing simply that authors, etc. entitled to copyright in one country should be entitled to it in the other, on the same conditions and for the same term. The Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate reported the Everett treaty favorably, but it was tabled in Committee of the Whole. Five New York publishers addressed a letter to Mr. Everett, supporting a convention, providing the work should be registered in the United States before publication abroad, issued here within thirty days after publication abroad, and wholly manufactured in this country. It was in this year that Henry C. Carey published his famous " Letters on International Copyright," in which he held that ideas are the common prop- erty of society, and that copyright is therefore indefensible. In 1858 Mr. Morris, of Penn- sylvania, introduced into the House a bill on the basis of remanufacture by an American publisher within thirty days of publication abroad, but it does not seem to have been considered. The matter slumbered until 1868— after Mr. Dickens's second visit in 1867 — when a com- COPYRIGHT. 29 mittee consisting of George P. Putnam, S. Irenseus Prime, Henry Ivison, James Parton, and Egbert Hazard, issued an appeal for " Jus- tice to Authors and Artists," calling a meeting, which was held under the presidency of W. C. Bryant, April gth, 1868. A "Copyright As- sociation " was then organized, with Mr. Bryant as President and E. C. Stedman as Secretary, whose primary object was " to promote the en- actment of a just and suitable international copy- right law for the benefit of authors and artists in all parts of the world." A m°morial to Con- gress, asking early attention for a bill " to se- cure in all parts of the world the right of authors, ' ' but making no recommendations in detail, was signed by one hundred and fifty-three persons, including one hundred and one authors and nineteen publishers. A bill was introduced in the House this same year by J. D. Baldwm, of Massachusetts, which provided for copyright on foreign books wholly manufactured here and published by an American citizen. This was reported favorably by the Library Committee, which said : " We are fully persuaded that it is not only expedient, but in a high degree important, to the United States to establish such international copyright laws as will protect the rights of American authors in foreign countries and give similar protection to foreign authors in this country. It would be an act of national honor and justice in which we should find that justice is the wisest policy for nations and brings the richest reward." The bill was, however, recommitted and never more heard of. In 1870 what has since been known as the Clarendon treaty was proposed to the American Government by Lord Clarendon on behalf of the British Government, through Sir Edward Thorn- ton, then British Minister at Washington. This was modelled on the treaties existing between Great Britain and other European nations, and provided that an author of either country should have full protection in the other country to the extent of its domestic law, on the sole condition of registration and deposit in the other country within three months after its first publication in the country in which it first appeared, the con- vention to continue in force for five years, and thence from year to year, unless twelve months' notice of termination were given. This was criticised (in Messrs. Harper's letter of Novem- ber 25th, 1878) as a scheme " more in the inter- est of British publishers than either of British or American authors," on the ground that British publishers would secure American with British copyright, and give no opportunity to American houses to issue works of English authors. The next year the following resolution, offered by Mr. S. S. Cox, was passed by the House, December i8th, 1871 : "Resolved, That the Committee on the Library be directed to consider the question of an in- ternational copyright, and to report to this House what, in their judgment, would be the wisest plan, by treaty or law, to secure the property of authors in their works, without injury to other rights and inteiests ; and if in their opinion Congressional legislation is the best, that they report a bill for that purpose." Mr. Cox had himself presented, December 6th, 1871, a bill for international copyright on a. basis of reciprocity, providing foreign works should be wholly manufactured In the United States and published by American citizens, and be registered, deposited, and arrangements for such publication made within three months of first publication In the foreign country. This bill was supported in Committee of the Whole by speeches from Mr. Archer, of Maryland, and Mr. Storm, of Pennsylvania, but opposed by Mr. Kelley, of Pennsylvania, who presented the following resolution : " Whereas, It is expedient to facilitate the re- production here of foreign works of a higher character than that of those now generally re- printed in this country ; and whereas it is in like manner desirable to facilitate the reproduction abroad of the works of our own authors ; and whereas Mi^ grant of monopoly privileges, incase of reproduction here or elsewhere must tend greatly to Increase the cost of books, to limit their circulation, and to Increase the already ex- isting obstacles to the dissemination of knowl- edge : Therefore, "Resolved, That the joint Committee on the Library be and it hereby is instructed to Inquire Into the practicability of arrangements by means of which such reproduction, both here and abroad, may be facilitated, freed from the great disadvantages that must inevitably result from the grant of monopoly privileges such as are now claimed in behalf of foreign authors and domestic publishers." Mr. Cox's resolution was acted upon In 1873 by the new Library Committee, which invited the co-operation of authors, publishers, and oth- ers interested In framing a bill. At meetings of New York publishers, January 23d and February 6th, 1872, a bill prepared by Mr. W. H. Apple- ton and accepted by Mr. A. D. F. Randolph, Mr. Isaac E. Sheldon, and Mr. D. Van Nos- trand, of a committee, was approved by a ma- 30 COPYRIGHT. jority vote. It provided for copyright on for- eign books issued under contract with an Ameri- can publisher, " wholly the product of the me- chanical Industry of the United States," and reg- istered within one month and published within, three months from the foreign issue, stipulating that if a work were out of print for three months the copyright should lapse. This was in line with a letter printed by Mr. W. H. Ap- pleton in the London Times, October, 1871, de- nying that there was any disposition in the United States to withhold justice from English authors, but objecting to any " kind of legal sad- dle for the English publisher to ride his author into the American book-market ;" in response to which Herbert Spencer, John Stuart IMill, Froude, Carlyle, and others had signed a memorial to Lord Granville expressing a willingness to ac- cept a copyright on the condition of confining American copyright to American assigns of Eng- lish authors, and excluding English publishers. Mr. Appleton's bill was opposed in a minority report by Mr. Edward Seymour, of the Scribner house, on the ground that it was " in no sense an international copyright law, but simply an act to protect American publishers" ; that the desired " protection" could be evaded by English houses through an American partner ; and that the act was objectionable In prohibiting stereos, in fail- ing to provide for cyclopsedias, and in enabling an American publisher to exclude revised edi- tions. A meeting of Philadelphia publishers, January 27th, 1872, opposed international copy- right altogether, in a memorial declaring that " thought, when given to the world, is, as light, free to all ;" that copyright is a matter of munici- pal (domestic) law ; that any foreigner could get American copyright by becoming an American citizen ; and that " the good of the whole people and the safety of republican institutions" would be contravened by putting into the hands of for- eign authors and " the great capitalists on the Atlantic seaboard" the power to make books high. The Executive Committee of the Copy- right Association met in New York, February 2d, 1872, and put forward Mr. Charles Astor Bristed's bill securing copyright, after two years from date of passage, to citizens of other coun- tries granting reciprocity all the rights of Amer- ican citizens. The Library Committee gave several hearings on the subject, February 12th and later, and among other contributions to the discussion re- ceived a letter from Messrs. Harper taking ground that " any measure of international copyright was objectionable because it would add to the price of books, and thus interfere with the edu- cation of the people ;" and a suggestion from John P. Morton, of Louisville, to permit general republication on payment of a ten per cent roy- alty to the foreign author. The same suggestion, providing for five per cent royalty, as brought forward by Mr. John Elderkin, was introduced, in a bill, February 21st, 1872, by Mr.Beck in the House, and Mr. Sherman in the Senate. The Committee, in despair over these conflict- ing opinions, presented the celebrated MorrlU report of February 7th, 1873, Senator Lot M. Morrill being the chairman, including a tabular comparison of the prices of American and Eng- lish books. It said that " there was no unanim- ity of opinion among those interested in the measure," and concluded : In view of the whole case, your committee are satisfied that no form of international copy- right can fairly be urged upon Congress upon reasons of general equity, or of constitutional law ; that the adoption of any plan for the pur- pose which has been laid before us would be of very doubtful advantage to American authors as a class, and would be not only an unques- tionable and permanent injury to the manufact- uring interests concerned in producing books, but a hindrance to the diffusion of knowledge among the people, and to the cause of universal education ; that no plan for the protection of foreign authors has yet been devised which can unite the support of all or nearly all who profess to be favorable to the genera! object in view ; and that, in the opinion of your com- mittee, any project for an international copy- right will be found upon mature deliberation to be Inexpedient. This was decidedly a damper to the cause, and the movement lapsed for some years. The question rested until 1878, when, under date of November 25th, Messrs. Harper ad- dressed a letter to Mr. Evarts, Secretary of State, suggesting that previous failures were due " to the fact that all such propositions have origi- nated from one side only, and without prior joint consultation and intelligent discussion," reiterat- ing " that there was no disinclination on the part of American publishers to pay British authors the same as they do American authors," and that ■' American publishers simply wished to be assured that they should have the privilege of printing and publishing the books of British au- thors ;" indicating " the likelihood of the accept- ance by the United States of a treaty which should recognize the interests of all parties ;" COP YRIGHT. 31 and proposing a Conference or Commission io| eighteen Americans and Englishmen — three au^ thors, three publishers, and three publicists to be appointed on each side, by the American Sec- retary of State and the British Secretary fof Foreign Affairs — which should consider and pre- sent the details of a treaty. They also presented, as a suggested basis of action, what came to be known as the " Har- per draft," a modification of the Clarendon treaty, providing that there should be registra- tion in both countries before publication in the country of origin ; that international registration should be in the name of the author — if a citizen of the United States, at Stationers' Hall, Lon- don ; if a subject of Her Majesty, at the Library of Congress, Washington ; and that " the author of any work of literature manufactured and pub- lished in the one country shall not be entitled to copyright in the other country unless such work shall be also manufactured and published therein, by a subject or citizen thereof, wiihin three months after its original publication in the country of the author or proprietor ; but this proviso shall not apply to paintings, engravings, sculptures, oi" other works of art ; and the word " manufact- ure ' shall not be held to prohibit printing in one country from stereotype plates prepared in the other and imported for this purpose." This draft was approved by fifty-two lead- ing American authors, including Longfellow, Holmes, Emerson, and Whittier, in a memorial dated August, 1880. The American members of the International Copyright Committee, ap pointed by the Association for the Reform and Codification of the Law of Nations, Messrs. John Jay, James Grant Wilson, and Nathan Appleton, also memorialized the Secretary of State", under date of February nth, 1880, in favor of this general plan, specifying " within from one to three months" as the manufacturing limit. It was also approved by the great body of American publishers, although Messrs. Put- nam, Scribner, Holt, and Roberts in signing took exception to certain of the restrictions, es- pecially to the time limit of three months. Mr. George Haven Putnam set forth the views of his house in a paper before the New York Free Trade Club, January 29th, 1879, afterward printed as Economic Monograph No. XV., " Interna- tional Copyright considered in some of its rela- tions to ethics and political economy." In this he suggested simultaneous registration in both countries, republication within six months, and restriction of copyright protection here for the first ten years of the term to books printed and bound in the United States and published by an American citizen. An interesting series of replies from American authors, publishers, etc., as to methods for inter- national copyright, to queries from the Pub- lishers' Weekly will be found in v. 15, com- mencing with No. 7, Feb. 15, 1879. The " Harper draft" was submitted in Sep- tember, 1880, by Mr. Lowell to Earl Granville, who replied, March, 1881, that the British Gov- ernment favored such a treaty, but considered an extension of the republication term to six months essential, and to twelve months much more equitable. In the same month the Inter- national Literary Association adopted a report favoring an agreement, but protesting against the manufacturing clause and time limit. This posi- tion was also taken at several meetings of Lon- don publishers, and Mr. F. R. Daldy was sent to America to further the English view. Sir Edward Thornton, British Minister at Washing- ton, was instructed to proceed to the considera- tion of the treaty, provided the term for reprint could be extended, and both President Garfield and Secretary Blaine were understood to favor the completion of a treaty. With the death of Garfield the matter ended for the time. It was revived once more in 1S84. A new copyright association, the American Copyright League, had been organized in 1883, chiefly through the efforts of George P. Lathrop, Ed- ward Eggleston, and R. W. Gilder, and there was a general revival of interest in the question. On January 9, 1884, Mr. Dorsheimer, of New York, introduced into the House his bill for in- ternational copyright, which provided for the extension of copyright to citizens of countries granting reciprocal privileges, so soon as the President should issue his proclamation ac- cepting such reciprocity, for the life of the author, or for twenty-five years, providing he should live longer than that time. This bill was the occasion of a general discussion. The Copyright League addressed a letter to Mr. Dorsheimer urging the modification of the above limitations, and it was particularly pointed out that the confining of copyright to an author's life- time would render literary property most In- secure. The League also addressed a letter to the Secretary of State, urging the completion of a treaty with Great Britain, to which Mr. Fre- linghuysen replied, January 25, 1884, that while COPYRIGHT. the negotiation as to tiie Harper draft had not been interrupted, he thought the object might be attained by a simple amendment to our pres- ent copyright law, based on reciprocity, after which a simple convention would suffice to put the amendment in force. Mr. Dorsheiraer's bill was referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary, and reported favorably, with amend- ments extending the copyright term to twenty- eight years, without regard to the decease of the author, with renewal for fourteen years. The amended bill also provided that such copyright should cease in case reciprocity was withdrawn by another country ; that there should be no copyright in works, already published, and that the provisions of the domestic copyright law should as far as applicable extend also to foreign copyrights. On the igth of February Mr. Dor- sheimer moved to make his bill the special order for February 27, but his motion failed of the necessary two-thirds, vote, 155 voting aye, 98 nay and 55 not voting. There was considerable opposition on the part of those who insisted upon the re-manufacture of foreign books in this coun- try, and Mr. Dorsheimer privately expressed himself as willing to accept, although not willing to favor, amendments in that direction if they were necessary to insure the passage of the bill. A circular letter of inquiry sent out by the Publishers' Weekly in March, 1884, showed a general desire on the part of American publish- ers in favor of international copyright. Of fifty- five leading publishers who answered, fifty-two favored and only three opposed international copyright. Out of these, twenty-eight advoca- ted International Copyright pure and simple ; fourteen favored a " manufacturing clause ;" the others did not reply on this point. Congress adjourned, however, without taking definite action. President Arthur, in his message of December, 1884, put himself on record as favoring copyright on the basis of reciprocity. The Dorsheimer bill was re-introduced by Mr. English, January 5, 1885, and on January 6 Senator Hawley in- troduced "the Hawley bill" into the Senate. This latter, which covered all copyright arti- cles, while Mr. Dorsheimer's had been con- fined to books, was understood to be favored by the Copyright League ; it extended copy- right to citizens of foreign States, on a basis of reciprocity, for books or other works published after the passage of the bill, by repealing those parts of the Revised Statutes confining copyright to "citizens of the United States or resident therein." No action was taken, however, on either the Dorsheimer or the Hawley bill. A bill brought forward in the Publishers' Week- ly of December 6, 1884, was intended, by a form admitting of easy amendment, to facilitate the passage of some kind of bill extending the prin- ciple of copyright to citizens of foreign countries under limitations set forth in subsequent sections of the bill. In his first annual message, 1885, President Cleveland referred favorably to the negotiations at Berne, and with the opening of the Forty-ninth Congress two bills were introduced into the Senate, that of Senator Hawley (December 7, 1885), being essentially his bill of the previous year, and that of Senator Chace (January 21, 1886), a new bill, based on a plan put forward some years previously by Mr. Henry C. Lea and now supported by the Typographical Union and other labor organizations. The Hawley bill is on a simple basis of reciprocity ; the Chace bill requires registry within fifteen days and deposit of the best American edition within six months from publication abroad, at a fee of $1, to be used in printing a list of copyright books for customs use ; the prohibition of importations ; and the voiding of copyright when the Ameri- can manufacturer abandons publication. They are both before the Senate Committee on Pat- ents, which has given several hearings to those interested in the subject. XI. COPYRIGHT PROGRESS— AUTHORS AND PUBLISHERS. The unsettled and confused state of copyright law, as «hown in the previous chapters, makes desirable a thorough revision of our domestic copyright code, and the pending organization of an International Copyright Union, similar to the existing International Postal Union, with the proposed revision and assimilation to a general system of the domestic law of England and other countries, makes the time opportune. The copyright term adopted by Germany, of the author's life and thirty years thereafter, promises to become the standard statutory term, giving the control and returns of all his works directly to the author and his heirs or assigns into the period of a third generation and avoiding all questions as to the date of commencement of copyright or the lapse at dif- ferent times of copyright on different works. With an adequate term, extending the benefit of an author's works into the days of his children and grandchildren, the question of perpetuity of copyright, except as an acknowledgment of an author's inherent right in his own product, is comparatively unimportant. There are, indeed, two considerations which go far to reconcile the upholders of authors' rights to a statutory term, waiving rights at common law. An indetermi- nate copyright would bring, if sold by the author, little if any more " outright" price than one for the term designated ; and if the author retains copyright for his own proper heirs, his duties to his own posterity are fairly limited (as in the precedent of the law of entail) to his grandchil- dren. Beyond the term designated, the pub- lisher or other beneficiary holding the exclusive right would have little natural relation to the original producer, and the reversion may very fairly be to the public. Moreover, in the case of material property, where a material exists, it is difficult enough to keep a title clear from gener- ation to generation ; it might be still more diffi- cult in the case of immaterial property. The adoption of an adequate term, the freeing of the copyright system from mere technicalities which tend to forfeit rights for inadequate reasons, the recognition in the law itself of the present status of copyright as determined by judicial interpretations, the adoption into our law of useful features found in the copyright sys- tems of other countries, are all desiderata for our domestic code, and the appointment by Congress of a Commission of experts to report a revised and comprehensive system, at an en- suing session or to a later Congress, would be most desirable. The relations between authors and publishers is not properly within the scope of such a code — a fact overlooked by the advocates of what is called " the royalty system." The law, whether as to copyright or other matters, should afford a basis of certainty for business, but it cannot wisely interfere with freedom of contract be- tween the parties to a busin-iss transaction. " The royalty plan," whether for domestic or international copyright, proposes that the law shall permit any person to publish the work of any author, on payment to him of a specified royalty, say of ten or five per cent, or a fixed sum per copy, on each copy sold. In reply to the criticism that the author would thus be put at the mercy of irresponsible persons, unless the Gov- ernment undertook an elaborate system of ac- counting and guarantee to the author as its ward, the suggestion has been made that the royalty 34 COP YRIGHT. should be paid by means of stamps affixed to each copy publislied, sold by the auti.or to the pub- lisher — a system actually in' practice in the shoe business, under the royalty scheme of the McKay Sewing-Machine Company. The an- swer to both is that the author is now at liberty to make such arrangements, by contract with one publisher or with many, and that a law to compel him to adopt any one plan of marketing his wares would interfere with his freedom of choice and his natural return. The reason that an author chooses one publisher instead of many is the simple one that the original cost of mak- ing and advertising a. book is, in this way, re- duced to one oullay instead of multiplied in many, and that this cost is minimized by being •distributed over the largest possible edition. It is the practice of any successful publisher to plan for such an edition as will command the widest sale, and so distribute the original cost over as many copies as possible, and when a copyright book proves to be of such general demand that different styles of editions can be sold, such editions are in fact made by the same publisher. " The royalty plan" would only protect the pub- lic against the unwisdom of publishers whose mistakes are presently corrected by business failure or by the transfer of his books by the author to more enterprising houses. The relations between author and publisher are simply those between principal and agent, or, where an author sells " outright," between buyer and seller. The "outright" pi ice of a book is purely a matter of bargain, and no gen- eral rule applies. The author may reserve the " renewal " for his own, benefit, or contract to renew as part of the oiiginal bargain. In the case where the publisher acts as agent for the author, the arrangement may be one of several different kinds. Either the author or the pub- lisher may bargain to defray the cost of setting the type or making " plates," in which last case the plates usually remain the property of the party paying for them. An allowance of about ten per cent on the actual manufacturing cost of plates is -a. fair charge of the publisher for his oversijht of them. Either the author or the publisher may bargain to defray the cost of mak- ing the edition (paper, press-work, and binding), and of the advertising, usually a large item, and like expenses. The remaining profits may be equally divided, which is the " half profits" sys- tem used in England. Or a definite percentage, usually calculated on the retail price (excluding the price of fancy bindings), may be paid the author — usually in America fifteen or twenty per cent when the author pays for the book and takes the risk ; ten per cent on general, and five per cent on school and subscription books when the publisher does these. Or the author may ar- range to pay the publisher a definite commission of ten or twenty per cent, as selling agent, and take all risk. An author's copyright is reckoned almost invariably not on copies printed, but on copies sold, and accountea for yearly or half- yearly. The " half-profits" system is apt to lead to much misunderstanding as to the actual ex- penses (e.g., general office expenses of a pub- lisher,) to be deducted before profits are reck- oned, and the American ten per cent system is, on the whole, most satisfactory. The publisher does not, as is sometimes naively assumed, get the other ninety per cent as profit ; he* gets the difference between the returns from the trade or public on copies actually sold — averaging perhaps two thirds of the "retail price," on which the author's ten per cent (really thus fifteen per cent) is reckoned — and the cost of making the entire edition and of advertising and marketing the book. The author, in any event, gets a re- turn proportioned to the success of his bOok. If its sales are small, the publisher makes a loss if large, the publisher makes a prorit increasing proportionately with each extra thousand sold. It is by means of this profit on successful books that the publisher is able to take risks with new books and new authors. It has been said that of five books, three fail, one covers its cost, the fifth must pay a profit to cover the rest. The element of risk in the book business is, in fact, very large ; if the author complains that his suc- cessful book ought not to pay for others' unsuc- cessful books, he can get over the difficulty by taking the risk himself, and making correspond- ing terms with a publisher. On a dollar cloth- bound book, it may usually be roughly estimated that the cost is 30 cents, the trade discount 30 cents (covering the bookseller's expenses, risk, and profit), the author's royalty 10 cents ; out of the remaining 30 cents the publisher covers expenses, risk, and profit. On the average, he nets probably less than the 10 cents of the au- thor, and the system is essentially on an equita- ble basis. The publisher's larger returns come from the fact that he handles more books than any one author writes. The publisher has usu- ally in bargaining with the author the advantage of larger experience and superior business abil- COP Y RIGHT. 35 ity, and of the fact that the author seeks him rather than he the author ; but no law can better the author in these respects. As a matter of practice, the better publishing houses treat with new authors on the same terms as with old, and have a form of contract on which transactions are based. It is usually understood in these contracts that a book remains with the publisher so long as he keeps it in the market ; if an author wishes to retain control of his book, that should be specified. The true secret, in fact, of satis- factory relations- between author and publisher lies in a full understanding of the conditions of the arrangement in settling the terms of a con- tract, and these details of customary arrange- ments have here been given to correct the com- mon confusion between copyright law and a business relation, which rests solely upon the common law of contracts. In regard to international copyright, this country has yet to put itself on a par with other civilized nations, and blot out what has become a national disgrace. There are two great rea- sons for international copyright — the general principle of justice inciting us to pay foreign authors for the service they do us, and the un- wisdom of discouraging home literature by sub- jecting home authors and home books to com- petition with absolutely unpaid labor. The plea against the first, that a nation legislates chiefly for its own citizens, is met by the second, as well as by the increasing disposition of civilized nations mutually to recognize and protect prop- erly of all kinds and of any owner. The reasons commonly advanced against international copy- right are (i) that we have got on well without it, and may best leave things as they are, instead of "forcing the people to pay for what they can now have free ;" (2) that it would make books dearer, whereas American civilization depends on cheap education, which in turn depends on cheap books ; (3) that the benefit would be, not to the foreign author, but to the foreign pub- lisher, who "would foist on us English editions and take work from our mechanics ; (4) that the best foreign authors stimulate our own to greater efforts, so that they can supply the Amer- ican market and diive out poor foreign books ; (5) that copyright gives a monopoly to a few authors against the interest of the many readers, and is kindred to patents, depriving new-comers of the benefit of what they might have invented for themselves. The answers to these objections may be briefly outlined as follows: (i) "Things as they are" are against the present standard of international honesty, and against the interest of American authors. Moreover, people would not be " forced to pay for what they now have free,'' for international copyright would not be retro- active, and the cheap reprints from Shakespeare to Tennyson could still be had. (2) It would make the new books of foreign authors dearer, but by affording opportunity for wider sale of American books, it would tend to make them cheaper, distributing the original cost among larger editions. The novel-devourer, buying " the last new novel," now takes an English re- print at 10 or 20 cents instead of an American work at 50 cents or $1. IVIoreover, even in England, while three-volume novels, etc., are higher priced than here, the many li nes of popular new books are often cheaper than here {e. g., two shillings sixpence to our seventy-five cents), so that the question of relative prices has not the bearing alleged by the opponents of interna- tional copyright. The French copyright litera- ture, with full copyright, is the cheapest in the world. American cheap education has come from cheap school-hoo)iis, which are American and are already copyright. Further, " there is one thing better than a jcheap book," as Mr. Lowell says, " and that is a book honestly come by ;" and, above all, American civilization de- pends on the honesty and justice of the people. (3) The foreign author would soon learn to bar- gain for his American market, and American editions would best meet American wants. The increased demand for American books would also operate to give our mechanics more to do. At worst, this objection would be met by the proposed manufacturing clause (which logically, however, has no more to do than the tariff with copyright), confining copyright to books printed here. Such a clause should not, however, pro- hibit the use of imported stereotype plates and electros of illustrations, since otherwise we should have to pay twice for doing work that can be done once for both countries, and should cut ourselves off from printing many illustrated books. The amount of type-setting involved is exaggerated — it is probably less than that of two or three of our daily papers together, and is largely the cheap work of women or machines. The manufacturing clause is advocated by some publishers for a term of years only, until foreign authors get into the habit of dealing for the American market separately. (4) American au- 36 COP Y RIGHT. thors would still be " stimulated " by the best foreign authors, but they would no longer be disheartened by the underselling rivalry of poor books, from unpaid labor, included by the cheap libraries to keep up their periodical character and thus keep themselves within the low postal rates. " Genius" will doubtless have its say, pay or no pay, but much useful literature comes from men who must earn their own bread and butter and support their families, and who are now underpaid or kept from authorship by the narrow market to which they are reduced. Moreover, although American authors now get British copyright by domestic law, that source of income might be taken away by change in Brit- ish law, if we deny reciprocal rights to foreign authors. The author needs the widest market he can get, to give him similar return for his brain-work to that obtained by men in other in- tellectual or business pursuits. (5) The " few" authors have a right to ask from the " many" readers (even if it were i against 100,000,000) fair pay for the service which the reader is glad to enjoy. Moreover, copyright is not kindred to patents in the sense alleged. The first inventor of the telephone can prevent any one else patent- ing a telephone and utilizing the force of nature involved in it ; the author cannot do anything of the kind. No other author can be worse off be- cause he has written. Copyright is a "mo- nopoly" only as anything which a man produces and owns is a monopoly ; in this sense all prop- erty is monopoly, and the opposition to copy- right becomes communism. There has been a continuous growth in the Uni- ted States, though displayed somewhat intermit- tently, of an active sentiment in favor of inter- national copyright. For some years the question was less insistent, from the practical point of view, because of what was called " the courtesy of the trade," by which a publisher who was the first to reprint an English work was not dis- turbed by rival editions of that and succeeding works by the same author. Under this custom, the leading American publishers voluntarily made payments to foreign authors, in many cases the same ten per cent paid to American authors, and reaching in one case of " outright" purchase of " advance sheets" $5000, though there was no protection of law for the purchase. American and English works then competed on much the same terms. In 1876 the cheap quarto " libraries" were started, reprinting an entire English novel, though on poor paper and often in dangerously poor type, for 10, 15, or 20 cents. They presently obtained the advantage, by reg- ular- issue (one " library" at one time issuing a book daily, others weekly) of the low postal rates for periodicals, of two cents a pound, and thus ob- tained a further advantage over American books. These quartos are gradually giving way to the " pocket edition," in more convenient shape, but not always in better print, at 20 or 25 cents. The normal price of these novels, in better type and print, under international copyright, would prob- ably be 35 to 50 cents. The sales of corresponding American books has meanwhile definitely fallen. The history of the movements for international copyright here show that there has been no con- tinuous and well-defined policy on the part of the Government authorities, or of publishers, or of authors. While authors almost unanimously, and publishers generally, favor international copyright, the division lines as to method are not between authors and publishers, but between some authors and other authors, and between some publishers and other publishers. There are those, in both classes, who object to any bill which does not acknowledge to the full the in- herent rights of authors, by extending the pro- visions of domestic copyright to any author of any country, without regard to other circum- stances. There are others, at the other extreme, who oppose international copyright unless it is restricted to books manufactured in this country, issued simultaneously with their publication abroad, and of which the importation of other than the American copies is absolutely pro- hibited. But the number is steadily increasing of those willing to waive the abstract principle in favor of any moderate measure which shall be at least a first step of recognition, and which may justify by its results, even to the present opponents of international copyright, future steps of further progress. It is to be hoped that an International Copyright Union may, not many years hence, include all civilized nations on a mutual basis which shall do full justice to that class of producers who themselves do so much for the progress of the world. COPYRIGHT LAW OF THE UNITED STATES. The following sections of the Revised Statutes and subsequent acts constitute the existing copyright law of the United States : Revised Statute of the United States, being the Act of July 8, 1870, as contained in the Re- vised Statutes, Second Edition, 1878, /^^^ 957. Section 4948. All records and other things relating to copyrights and required by law to be preserved, shall be under the control of the Li- brarian of Congress, and kept and preserved in the Library of Congress ; and the Librarian of Congress shall have the immediate care and supervision thereof, and, under the supervision of the joint committee of Congress on the Li- brary, shall perform all acts and duties required by law touching copyrights. Sec. 4949. The seal provided for the office of the Librarian of Congress shall be the seal there- of, and by it all records and papers issued from the office and to be used in evidence shall be authenticated. Sec. 4950. The Librarian of Congress shall give a bond, with sureties, to the Treasurer of the United States, in the sum of five thousand dollars, with the condition that he will render to the proper officers of the Treasury a true ac- count of all moneys received by virtue of his office. Sec. 4951. The Librarian of Congress shall make an annual report to Congress of the num- ber and description of copyright publications for which entries have been made during the year. Sec. 4952. Any citizen of the United States or resident therein, who shall be the author, in- ventor, tfesigner, or proprietor of any book, map, chart, dramatic or musical composition, engrav- ing, cut, print,* or photograph or negative * See Act of 1874, =>■ 3, post, p. 40. thereof, or of a painting, drawing, chromo, statue, statuary, and of models or designs intended to be perfected as works of the fine arts, and the ex- ecutors, administrators, or assigns of any such persons shall, upon complying with the pro- visions of this chapter, have the sole liberty of printing, reprinting, publishing, completing, copying, executing, finishing, and vending the same ; and, in the case of a dramatic composi- tion, of publicly performing or representing it, or causing it to be performed or represented by others. And authors may reserve the right to dramatize or to translate their own works. Sec. 4953. Copyrights shall be granted for the term of twenty-eight years from the time of re- cording the title thereof, in the manner herein- after directed. Sec. 4954. The author, inventor, or designer, if he be still living and a citizen of the United States or resident therein, or his widow or chil- dren, if he be dead, shall have the same exclu- sive right continued for the further term of four- teen years, upon recording the title of the work or description of the article so secured a second time, and complying with all other regulations in regard to original copyrights, within six months before the expiration of the first term. And such person shall, within two months from the date of said renewal, cause a copy of the rec- ord thereof to be published in one or more news- papers, printed in the United States, for the space of four weeks. Sec. 4955. Copyrights shall be assignable in law, by any instrument of writing, and such as- signment shall be recorded in the office of the Librarian of Congress within sixty days after its execution ; in default of which it shall be void as against any subsequent purchaser or mortgagee for a valuable consideration, without notice. Sec. 4956. No person shall be entitled to a 38 COPYRIGHT. copyright unless he shall, before publication, de- liver at the office of the Librarian of Congress or deposit in the mail addressed to the Librarian of Congress, at Washington, District of Columbia, a printed copy of the title of the boolc or other article, or a description of the painting, draw- ing, chromo, statue, statuary, or a model or de- sign for a work of the fine arts, for which he de- sires a copyright, nor unless he shall also, within ten days from the publication thereof, deliver at the office of the Librarian of Congress or deposit in the mail addressed to the Librarian of Con- gress, at Washington, District of Columbia, two copies of such copyright book or other article, or in case of a painting, drawing, statue, statu- ary, model, or design for a work of the fine arts, a photograph of the same. Sec. 4957. The Librarian of Congress shall record the name of such copyright book or other article, forthwith, in a book to be kept for that purpose, in the words following : " Library of Congress, to wit : Be it remembered that on the day of , A. B., of , hath deposited in this office the title of a book (map, chart, or otherwise, as the case may be, or description of the article,) the title or description of which is in the following words, to wit ; (here insert the title or description,) the right whereof he claims as author, (originator, or proprietor, as the case may be,) in conformity with the laws of the United States respecting copyrights. C. D., Librarian of Congress." And he shall give a copy of the title or description, under the seal of the Librarian of Congress, to the proprietor whenever he shall require it. Sec. 4958. The Librarian of Congress shall receive, from the persons to whom the services designated are rendered, the following fees : First. For recording the title or description of any copyright book or other article, fifty cents. Second. For every copy under seal of such record actually given to the person claiming the copyright, or his assigns, fifty cents. Third. For recording any instrument of writ- ing for the assignment of a copyright, fifteen cents for every one hundred words.* Fourth. For every copy of an assignment, ten cents for every one hundred words.* All fees so received shall be paid into the Treasury of the United States. Sec. 4959. The proprietor of every copyright book or other article shall deliver at the office * See Act of 1874, s, 2, post^ p. 40. of the Librarian of Congress, or deposit in the mail addressed to the Librarian of Congress at Washington, District of Columbia, within ten days after its publication, two complete printed copies thereof, of the best edition issued, or de- scription or photograph of such article as herein- before required, and a copy of every subsequent edition wherein any substantial changes shall be made. Sec. 4960. For every failure on the part of the proprietor of any copyright to deliver or deposit in the mail either of the published copies, or de- scription or photograph, required by sections four thousand nine hundred and fifty-six, nnd four thousand nine hundred and fifty-nine, the proprietor of the copyright shall be liable to a penalty of twenty-five dollars, to be recovered by the Librarian of Congress, in the name of the United States, in an action in the nature of an action of debt, in any district court of the United States within the jurisdiction of which the delin- quent may reside or be found. Sec. 4961. The postmaster to whom such copyright book, title, or other article is deliv- ered, shall, if requested, give a receipt therefor ; and when so delivered he shall mail it to its des- tination. Sec. 4962. No person shall maintain an action for the infringement of his copyright unless he shall give notice thereof by inserting in the sev- eral copies of every edition published, on the title-page or the page immediately following, if it be a book ; or if a map, chart, musical com- position, print, cut, engraving, photograph, painting, drawing, chromo, statue, statuary, or model or design intended to be perfected and completed as a work of the fine arts, by inscrib- ing upon some portion of the face or front there- of, or on the face of the substance on which the same shall be mounted, the following words, " Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year , by A. B., in the office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington." * Sec. 4963. Every person who shall insert or impress such notice, or words of the same pur- port, in or upon any book, map, chart, musical composition, print, cut, engraving, or photo- graph, or other article, for which he has not ob- tained a copyright, shall be liable to a penalty of one hundred dollars, recoverable one half for the person who shall sue for such penalty, and one half to the use of the United States. * See Act of 1874, s.. \^post^ p. 39. COPYRJGH'l. 39 Sec. 4964. Every person who, after the re- cording of the title of any book as provided by this chapter, shall within the term limited, and without the consent of the proprietor of the copyright first obtained in writing, signed in presence of two or more witnesses, print, pub- lish, or import, or knowing the same to be so printed, published, or imported, shall sell or ex- pose to sale any copy of such book, shall forfeit every copy thereof to such proprietor, and shall also forfeit and pay such damages as may be re- covered in a civil action by such proprietor in any court of competent jurisdiction. Sec. 4965. If any person, after the recording of the title of any map, chart, musical composi- tion, print, cut, engraving, or photograph, or chromo, or of the description of any painting, drawing, statue, statuary, or model or design in- tended to be perfected and executed as a work of the fine arts, as provided by this chapter, shall, within the term limited, and without the con- sent of the proprietor of the copyright first ob- tained in writing, signed in presence of two or more witnesses, engrave, etch, work, copy, print, publish, or import, either in whole or in pari, or by varying the main design with intent to evade the law, or, knowing the same to be so printed, published, or imported, shall sell or expose to sale any copy of such map or other article, as aforesaid, he shall forfeit to the proprietor all the plates on which the same shall be copied, and every sheet thereof, either copied or printed, and shall further forfeit one dollar for every sheet of the same found in his possession, either printing, printed, copied, published, imported, or exposed for sale ; and in case of a painting, statue, or statuary, he shall forfeit ten dollars for every copy of the same in his possession, or by him sold or exposed for sale ; one half thereof to the proprietor and the other half to the use of the United States. Sec. 4966. Any person publicly performing or representing any dramatic composition for which a copyright has been obtained, without the consent of tlie proprietor thereof, or his heirs or assigns, shall be liable for damages therefor, such damages in all cases to be assessed at such sum, not less than one hundred dollars for the first, and fifty dollars for every subsequent per- formance, as to the court shall appear to be just. Sec. 4967. Every person who shall print or publish any manuscript whatever, without the consent of the author or proprietor first obtained. if such author or proprietor is a citizen of the United States, or resident therein, shall be liable to the author or proprietor for all damages occa- sioned by such injury. Sec. 4968. No action shall be maintained in any case of forfeiture or penalty under the copy- right laws, unless the same is commenced with- in two years after the cause of action has arisen. Sec. 4969. In all actions arising under the laws respecting copyrights, the defendant may plead the general issue, and give the special matter in evidence. Sec. 4970. The circuit courts, and district courts having the jurisdiction of circuit courts, shall have power, upon bill in equity, filed by any party aggrieved, to grant injunctions to pre- vent the violation of any right secured by the laws respecting copyrights, according to the course and principles of courts of equity, on such terms as the court may deem reasonable. Sec. 4971. Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to prohibit the printing, publishing, importation, or sale of any book, map, chart, dramatic or musical composition, print, cut, en- graving, or photograph, written, composed, or made by any person not a citizen of the United States nor resident therein. Act of June 18, 1874. An act to amend the law relating to patents, trade-marks , and copyrights, as contained in the Supplement to the Rev. Stat. , V. I, 1881,/. 40. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Repre- sentatives of the United States of Ameiica in Con- gress assembled, [Section i] That no person shall maintain an action for the infringement of his copyright unless he shall give notice thereof by inserting in the several copies of every edi- tion published, on the title-page or the page im- mediately follow ing, if it be a book ; or if a map, chart, musical composition, print, cut, engraving, photograph, painting, drawing, chromo, statue, statuary, or model 01 design intended to be per- fected and completed as a work of the fine arts, by inscribing upon some visible portion thereof, or of the substance on which the same shall be mounted, the following words, viz.: "Entered according to act of Congress, in the year , by A. B. , in the office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington ;" or, at his option the word " Copy- right," together with the year the copyright was entered, and the name of the party by whom it was taken out ; thus — " Copyright, 18 — , by A. B." 40 COP YRJGHT. Sec. 2. That for recording and certifying any instrument of writing for the assignment of a copyright, the Librarian of Congress shall re- ceive from the persons to whom the service is rendered, one dollar ; and for every copy of an assignment, one dollar ; said fee to cover, in either case, a certificate of the record, under seal of the Librarian of Congress ; and all fees so received shall be paid into the Treasury of the United States. Sec. 3. That in the construction of this act, the words " Engraving," " cut" and " print" shall be applied only to pictorial illustrations or works connected with the fine arts, and no prints or labels designed to be used for any other arti- cle of manufacture shall be entered under the copyright law, but may be registered in the Patent Office. And the Commissioner of Pat- ents is hereby charged with the supervision and control of the entry or registry of such prints or labels, in conformity with the regulations pro- vided by law as to copyright of prints, except that there shall be paid for recording the title of any print or label not a trade-mark, six dollars, which shall cover the expense of furnishing a copy of the record under the seal of the Com- missioner of Patents, to the party entering the same. Sec. 4. That all laws and parts of laws incon- sistent with the foregoing provisions be and the same are hereby repealed. Sec, 5. That this act shall take effect on and after the first day of August, eighteen hundred and seventy-four. Approved, June 18, 1874. Provisions of the Revised Statutes of the United States which, with section '4970 {ante, p. 39), govern furisdiction in Copyright Cases. Sec. 629. The circuit courts shall have original jurisdiction as follows : First. Of all suits of a civil nature at common law or in equity, where the matter in dispute, exclusive of costs, exceeds the sum or value of five hundred dollars, and an alien is a party, or the suit is between a citizen of the State where it is brought and a citizen of another State. . . . Ninth. Of all suits at law or in equity arising under the patent or copyright laws of the United States.* Sec. 699. A writ of error [to the Supreme Court of the United States] may be allowed to review any final judgment at law, and an appeal shall be allowed from any final decree in equity hereinafter mentioned, without regard to the sum or value in dispute : First. Any final judgment at law or final de- cree in equity of any circuit court, or of any dis- trict court acting as a circuit court, or of the supreme court of the District of Columbia, or of any Territory, in any case touching patent-rights or copyrights. f DIRECTIONS FOR SECURING COPYRIGHTS UNDER THE REVISED ACTS OF CONGRESS. The following " Official Directions for Secur- ing Copyright," in explanation of the law, are issued by the Librarian of Congress : I. A printed copy of the title (besides the two copies to be deposited after publication) of the book, map, chart, dramatic or musical composi- tion, engraving, cut, print, photograph, or a de- scription of the painting, drawing, chromo, statue, statuary, or model or design for a work of the fine arts, for which copyright is desired, must be sent by mail or otherwise, prepaid, addressed Librarian of Congress, Washington, D, C. This must be done before publication of the book or other article. The printed title tei\n.mA may be a copy of the title-page of such publications as have title- pages. In other cases, the title must be printed expressly for copyright entry, with name of claimant of copyright. The style of type is im- material, and the print of a type-writer will be * U. S. Rev. Stat., 'p. no, III. The Act of March 3, 1875, Supp. to Rev. Stat. v. i, p. 173, provides that " the circuit courts of the United States shall have original cognizance, concurrent with the courts of the several Stakes, of all suits of a civil nature at common law or in equity, where the matter in dispute exceeds, exclusive of costs, the sum or value of iive hundred dollars, and arising under the Constitution or laws of the United States, or treaties made, or which shall be made, under their au- thority, or in which the United States are plaintiffs or pe- titioners, or in which there shall be a controversy between citizens of different States or a controversy between citizens of the same State claiming land under grants of different States, or a controversy between citizens of a State and for- eign states, citizens, or subjects." t U. S. Rev. Stat., p. 130. COP Y RIGHT. 41 accepted. But a separate title is required for each entry, and each title must be printed on paper as large as commercial note. The title of a periodical musx. include the date and number. 2. A fee of fifty cents, for recording the title of each book or other article, must be inclosed with the title as above, and fifty cents in addition (or one dollar in all) for each certificate of copy- right under seal of the Librarian of Congress, which will be transmitted by early mail. 3. Within ten days after publication of each book or other article, two complete copies of the best edition issued must be sent, to perfect the copyright, with the address Librarian of Congress, Washington, D. C. The postage must be prepaid, or else the publi- cation inclosed in parcels covered by printed Penalty Labels, furnished by the Librarian, in which case they will come free by mail, accord- ing to rulings of the Post Office Department. Without the deposit of copies above required the copyright is void, and a penalty of $25 is in- curred. No copy is required to be deposited elsewhere. 4. No copyright is valid unless notice is given by inserting in every copy published, on the title- page or the page following, if it be a book ; or, if a map, chart, musical composition, print, cut, engraving, photograph, painting, drawing, chromo, statue, statuary, or model or design in- tended to be perfected as a work of the fine arts, by inscribing upon some portion thereof, or on the substance on which the same is mounted, the following words, viz. : " Entered according to act of Congress, in the year , by , in the ojffice of the Librarian of Congress, at Wash- ington," or, at the option of the person enter- ing the copyright, the words : " Copyright, 18 — , by ." The law imposes a penalty of $100 upon any person who has not obtained copyright who shall insert the notice, "Entered according to act of Congress," or " Copyright," etc., or words of the same import, in or upon any book or other article. 5. Any author may reserve the right to trans- late or to dramatize his own work. In this case, notice should be given by printing the words " Right of translation reserved," or " All rights reserved," below the notice of copyright entry, and notifying the Librarian of Congress of such reservation, to be entered upon the record. Since the phrase all rights reserved refers ex- clusively to the author's right to dramatize or to translate, it has no bearing upon any publica- tions except original works, and will not be en- tered upon the record in other cases. 6. The original term of copyright runs for twenty-eight years. Within six months before the end of that time, the author or designer, or his widow or children, may secure a renewal for the further term of fourteen years, making forty- two years in all. Applications for renewal must be accompanied by explicit statement of owner- ship, in the case of the author, or of relation- ship in the case of his heirs, and must state defi- nitely the date and place of entry of the original copyright. Advertisement of renewal is to be made within two months of date of renewal cer- tificate, in some newspaper, for four weeks. 7. The time within which any work entered for copyright may be issued from the press is not limited by any law or regulation, but de- pends upon the discretion of the proprietor. A copyright may be secured for a projected work as well as for a completed one. 8. A copyright is assignable in law by any instrument of writing, but such assignment must be recorded in the office of the Librarian of Con- gress within sixty days from its date. The fee for this record and certificate is $1, and for a certified copy of any record of assignment $1. 9. A copy of the record (or duplicate certi- ficate) of any copyright entry will be furnished, under seal, at the rate of fifty cents each. 10. In the case of books published in more than one volume, or of periodicals, published in numbers, or of engravings, photographs, or other articles published with variations, a copyright is to be entered for each volume or part of a book, or number of a periodical, or variety, as to style, title, or inscription, of any other article. But a book published serially in a periodical, under the same general title, requires only one entry. To complete the copyright on such a work, two copies of each serial part, as well as of the com- plete work (if published separately), must be de- posited. 11. To secure a copyright for a painting, stat- ue, or model or design intended to be perfected as a work of the fine arts, so as to prevent in- fringement by copying, engraving, or vending such design, a definite description must accom- pany the application for copyright, and a photo- graph of the same, at least as large as " cabinet size," should be mailed to the Librarian of Con- 42 COF Y RIGHT. gress within ten days from the completion of the work or design. 12. Copyrights cannot be granted upon trade- marks, nor upon mere names of companies or articles, nor upon prints or labels intended to be used with any article of manufacture. If protection for such names or labels is desired, application must be made to the Patent OfBce, where they are registered at a fee of $5 for labels and $25 for trade-marks. 13. Citizens or residents of the United States only are entitled to copyright. 14. Every applicant for a copyright should state distinctly the full name and residence of the claimant, and whether the right is claimed as author, designer, or proprietor. No affidavit or formal application is required. Office of the Librarian of Congress, Washington, 1885. COPYRIGHT LAW OF GREAT BRITAIN. The following are the dates and titles of the laws constituting the existing copyright law of Great Britain : DOMESTIC COPYRIGHT. 8 Ceo. 2. c. 13. An Act for the encouragement of the arts of designing, engraving, and etching historical and other prints by vesting the proper- ties thereof in the inventors and engravers dur- ing the time therein mentioned. 7 Geo. 3. c. 38. An Act to amend and render more effectual an Act made in the eighth year of the reign of King George the Second for encour- agement of the arts of designing, engraving, and etching historical and other prints ; and for vest- ing in and securing to Jane Hogarth, widow, the property in certain prints. 15 Geo. 3. c. 53. An Act for enabling the two universities in England, the four universities in Scotland, and the several colleges of Eton, West- minster, and Winchester, to hold in perpetuity their copyright in books given or bequeathed to the said universities and colleges for the ad- vancement of useful learning and other purposes of education ; and for amending so much of an Act of the eighth year of the reign of Queen Anne as relates to the delivery of books to the warehouse keeper of the Stationers' Company for the use of the several libraries therein men- tioned. 17 Geo. 3. c. 57. An Act for more effectually securing the property of prints to inventors and engravers by enabling them to sue for and re- cover penalties in certain cases. 54 Geo. 3. c. 56. An Act to amend and render more effectual an Act of His present Majesty for encouraging the art of making new models and casts of busts and other things therein men- tioned, and for giving further encouragement to such arts. 3 Will. 4. c. 15. An Act to amend the laws relating to dramatic literary property. 5 & 6 Will. 4. t. 55. An Act for preventing the publication of lectures without consent. 6 & 7 Will. 4. c. 5g.' An Act to extend the pro- tection of copyright in prints and engravings to Ireland. 5 & 6 Vict. c. 45. An Act to amend the law of copyright. 25 & 26 Vict. I. 68. An Act for amending the law relating to copyright in works of the fine arts, and for repressing the commission of fraud in the production and sale of such works. 38 & 39 Vict. c. 53, in part. An Act to give effect to an Act of the Parliament of the Domin- ion of Canada respecting copyright. Section 4 only repealed. INTERNATIONAL COPYRIGHT. 7 & 8 Vict. c. 12. An Act to amend the law relating to international copyright. 15 & 16 Vict. c. 12, in part. An Act to enable Her Majesty to carry into effect a convention with France on the subject of copyright ; to ex- tend and explain the International Copyright Acts ; and to explain the Acts relating to copy- right in engravings. Repeal not to extend to sec- tion 14. 38 Vict. c. 12. An Act to amend the law re- lating to international copyright. The following is the Digest of these laws, pre- pared by Sir James Stephen, Q.C., and presented in the Report of the Royal Copyright Commis- sion, 1878, as the most authoritative statement of British copyright law : Article i. Copyright in Private Documents. The author or owner of any literary composi- tion or work of art has a right, so long as it re- 44 COP Y RIGHT. mains unpublished, to prevent the publication of any copy of it by any other person. Article 2. Effects oj Limited Publication of Private Docu- ments. The publication of any such thing as is men- tioned in the last article for a special and limited purpose, under any contract, or upon any trust express or implied, does not authorize the per- son to whom such thing is published to copy or reproduce it, except to the extent and for the purposes for which it has been lent or intrusted to him. Article 3. Letters. A person who writes and sends a letter to an- other retains his copyright in such letter, except in so far as the particular circumstances of the case may give a right to publish such letter to the person addressed, or to his representatives, but the property in the material on which the letter is written passes to the person to whom it is sent, so as to entitle him to destroy or trans- fer it. Article 4. No other Copyright except by Statute. There is (probably) no copyright after publica- tion in any of the things mentioned in Article i, except such copyright as is given by the express words of the statutes hereinafter referred to. Publication in this article means in reference to boolcs (as defined in the next article) publica- tion for sale. It is doubtful whether in relation to works of art it has any other meaning. There is (it seems) no copyright in dramatic perform- ances except by statute. Article 5. Book defined — Law of Copyright in 'Books. In this chapter the word "book" means and includes every volume, part or division of a vol- ume, pamphlet, sheet of letter-press, sheet of music, map, chart, or plan, separately published. The word "copyright" means the sole and exclusive liberty of printing, or otherwise multi- plying copies of any subject to which the word is applied. When a book is published in the lifetime of its author, the copyright therein is the personal property of the author and his assigns from the date of such publication, for whichever may be the longer of the two following terms, that is to say : (i) A term of 42 years from publication. (2) The life of the author, and a term of seven years, beginning from his death. If the publication takes place after the author's death, the proprietor of the author's manuscript and his assigns have copyright in his book for a term of 42 years from its first publication. If one person employs and pays another to write a book on the terms that the copyright therein shall belong to the employer, the em- ployer has the same copyright therein as if he had been the author. If the publisher or proprietor of any encyclo- paedia, review, magazine, or periodical work, or work published in parts or series, employs and pays persons to compose any volume, part, essay, article, or portion thereof, on the terms that the copyright therein shall belong to such publisher or proprietor, such publisher or pro- prietor has upon publication the same rights as if he were the author of the whole work (with the following exceptions) : 1. After 28 years from the first publication of any essay, article, or portion in any re- view, magazine, or other periodical work of a like nature [not being an encyclo- paedia], the right of publishing the same in a separate form reverts to the author for the remainder of the term for which his copyright would have endured if the same had been originally published by him elsewhere. 2. During the said term of 28 years the pub- lisher or proprietor may not publish any such essay, article, or portion, separately or singly, without the consent of the au- thor or his assigns. The author of any such magazine as aforesaid may, by contract with any such publisher or proprietor, reserve the right of publishing any work, his composition, in a separate form, and if he does so he is entitled to copyright in such composition when so published for the same term as if such publication were the first publication, but without prejudice to the right of the pub- lisher or proprietor to publish the same as part of such periodical work. In order to provide against the suppression of books of importance to the public, the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council are empowered, on complaint that the proprietor of the copy- COP YRIGHT. 45 right in any book after the death of its author has refused to republish or allow the republica- tion of the same, and that by reason of such re- fusal such book may be withheld from the pub- lic, to grant a license to such complainant to publish such book in such manner and subject to such conditions as they think fit, and the com- plainant may publish such book accordingly. The whole of this article is subject to the lim- itations contained in the subsequent articles of this chapter. It applies — 1 To all books published after 1st July, 1842. 2 To all books published before that day in which copyright was then subsisting, un- less such copyright was vested in any publisher or other person who acquired it for any consideration other than that of natural love or affection, in which case such copyright endures for the term then provided for by law, unless the author, if living on that day, or if he were then dead his personal representative, and (in either case) the proprietor of the copyright, reg- istered before the expiration of the term of copyright to which they were then en- titled, consent to accept the benefits of the Act 5 & 6 Vict. c. 45 in a form provided in a schedule therein. Article 6. Who may obtain Copyright in Books. In order that copyright in a published book may be obtained under the provisions of Article 5, the book must in all cases be published in the United Kingdom. The author or other person seeking to entitle himself to copyright may be either — (a) A natural born or naturalized subject of the Queen, in which case his place of residence at the time of the publication of the book is immaterial ; or [b) A person who at the time of the publica- tion of the book in which copyright is to be obtained owes local and temporary allegiance to Her Majesty by residing at that time in some part of Her Maj- esty's dominions. It is probable, but not certain, that an alien friend who publishes a book in the United King- dom while resident out of Her Majesty's domin- ions, acquires copyright throughout Her Maj- esty's dominions by such publication. Article 7. Previous and Contemporary Publication out of the United Kingdom. No copyright in a book published in the United Kingdom can be obtained under Article 5, if the book has been previously published by the author in any foreign country, but the contem- poraneous publication of a book in a foreign country and in the United Kingdom does not prevent the author from obtaining copyright in the United Kingdom. It is uncertain whether an author obtains copy- right by publishing a book in the United King- dom, after a previous publication thereof in parts of Her Majesty's dominions out of the United Kingdom. It is uncertain whether an author acquires copyright under Article 5 in any part of Her Majesty's dominions out of the United Kingdom (apart from any local law as to copyright which may be in force there) by the publication of a book in such part of Her Majesty's dominions. Article 8. J^o Copyright in immoral Publications. No copyright can exist in anything in which copyright would otherwise exist if it is immoral, irreligious, seditious, or libellous, or if it pro- fesses to be what it is not, in such a manner as to be a fraud upon the purchasers thereof. Article g. What is Infringement of Copyright in a Book, and what not — Fair Use of Books. The owner of the copyright in a book is not entitled to prevent other persons from publishing the matter contained in it if they inventor collect it independently, nor to prevent them from mak- ing a fair use of its contents in the composition of other books. The question, what is a fair use of a book, de- pends upon the circumstances of each particular case, but the following ways of using a book have been decided to be fair : (a) Using the information or the ideas con- tained in it without copying its words or imitating them so as to produce what is substantially a copy. {b) Making extracts (even if they are not ac- knowledged as such) appearing, under all the circumstances of the case, rea- sonable in quality, number, and length. 46 COP Y RIGHT. regard being had to the object with wnich the extracts are made and to the subjects to which they relate. (r) Using one book on a given subject as a guide to authorities afterward indepen- dently consulted by the author of an- other book on the same subject. ((/.) Using one book on a given subject for the purpose of checking the results indepen- dently arrived at by the author of an- other book on the same subject. An abridgment may be an original work if it is produced by a fair use of the original or orig- inals from which it is abridged, but the republi- cation of a considerable part of a book is an in- fringement of the copyright existing in it, al- though it may be called an abridgment, and al- though the order in which the republished parts are arranged may be altered. Article io. Crown Copyright. It is said that Her Majesty and her successors have the right of granting by patent from time to time to their printers an exclusive right to print the text of the authorized version of the Bible, of the Book of Common Prayer, and pos- sibly the text of Acts of Parliament. Article ii. University Copyright. The Universities of Oxford, Cambridge, Edin- burgh, Glasgow, St. Andrew's, and Aberdeen, each college or house of learning at the univer- sities of Oxford and Cambridge, Trinity College, Dublin, and the colleges of Eton, Westminster, and Winchester, have forever the sole liberty of printing and reprinting all such books as have been or hereafter may be bequeathed or given to them, or in trust for them, by the authorsthere- of, or by their representatives, unless they were given or bequeathed for any limited term. Article 12. How such Right forfeited. The exclusive right mentioned in the last article lasts so long only as the books or copies belonging to the said universities or colleges are printed only at their own printing presses within the said universities or colleges respectively, and for their sole benefit and advantage. If any university or college delegates, grants. leases, or sells its copyright or exclusive right of printing books granted by 13 Geo. 3. c. 53, or any part thereof, or allows or authorizes any person to print or reprint the same, the privilege granted by the said Act becomes void and of no effect, but the universities or colleges may sell the copyrights bequeathed to them as for the terms secured to authors by the 8 Anne c. ig. Article 13. Term of Copyright in Dramatic Pieces. The author, or the assignee of the author, of any tragedy, comedy, play, opera, farce, or any other dramatic piece or entertainment or musical composition not printed and published by such author or assignee, has, as his own property, the sole liberty of representing or causing to be rep- resented or performed, any such dramatic piece or musical composition at any place of dramatic entertainment whatever in Her Majesty's do- minions (possibly in perpetuity, but more proba- bly for) whichever is the longer of the two fol- lowing terms, viz. — (i) Forty-two years from the first public rep- resentation of such dramatic piece or musical composition. (2) The life of the author and a further term of seven years beginning from his death. The singing of a single song of a dramatic character in a dramatic manner may amount to a dramatic entertainment within the meaning of this article. Any place at which a dramatic entertainment is given [ ? for profit] on any particular occasion is a place of dramatic entertainment within the meaning of this article. Article 14. Condition of Copyright in Dramatic Pieces. The exclusive right of representing or per- forming a dramatic piece or musical composition cannot be gained if such dramatic piece or musical composition has been printed and pub- lished as a book before the first representation thereof. Or, if it has been publicly represented or caused to be represented by the author or his assigns in any place out of Her Majesty's do- minions before it was publicly represented in them, except under the International Copyright Act. COP YRIGHT. 47 Article 15. Copyright in and Representation of Dramas. Copyrigtit in a book containing or consisting of a dramatic piece or musical composition is a riglit distinct from the light to represent such dramatic piece or musical composition on the stage, and no assignment of the copyright of any such book conveys to the assignee the right of representing or performing such dramatic piece or musical composition unless an entry of such assignment is made in the registry book men- tioned in Article 23, expressing the intention of the parties that such right should pass. • Article 16. Representation of a Drama no Infringement of Copyright. A dramatic piece or musical composition pub- lished as a book may (it seems probable) be pub- licly represented without the consent of the au- thor or his assigns. Article 17. Dramatization of Novels. The public representation of a dramatic piece constructed out of a novel is not an infringement of the copyright of the author of the novel or his assigns, but the printing and publication as a book of such dramatic piece so represented may be such an infringement. If two persons independently of each other convert a novel into a dramatic piece, each has an exclusive right of representing his own dra- matic piece, though one #f them may be the au- thor of the novel so dealt with and though the two pieces may have parts in common. Article 18. Infringement of Copyright in a Musical Composi- tion. Copyright in a musical composition is infringed when a substantial portion of the music in which copyright exists is reproduced either without any alteration or with such alterations as are re- quired to adapt it to a different purpose or in- strument, the alterations being of such a char- acter that the substantial identity between the original and the altered version can be recog- nized by the ear. Article 19. Copyright in Lectures. The author of any lecture, or his assign, has by statute the sole right of publishing any lect- ure, of the delivery of which notice in writing has been given to two justices living within five miles from the place where such lecture is de- livered two days at least before it is delivered, unless such lecture is delivered in any univer- sity, public school, or college, or on any public foundation, or by any person in virtue of or ac- cording to any gift, endowment, or foundation. The author of any lecture has [probably] at common law the same right as by statute, with- out giving such notice as is required by statute, but he cannot recover the penalties provided by the Act and specified in Article 35, for an in- fringement of his copyright. Article 20. Copyright in Sculpture. Every person who makes or causes to be made any new and original sculpture, or model, or copy, or cast, . . .* has the sole right therein for the term of 14 years from first putting forth or piiblishing the same, provided that the proprietor causes his name, with the date, to be put on every such thing before it is published. If the proprietor be living at the end of the term of 14 years, his right returns to him for a further term of 14 years, unless he has divested himself thereof. Article 21. Copyright in Paintings and Photographs. The author, being a British subject or resident within the dominions of Her Majesty, of any original painting, drawing or photograph, not having been sold before the 2gth July, 1862, has the sole and exclusive right of copying, en- graving, reproducing, and multiplying such painting or drawing, and the design thereof, or such photograph and the negative thereof, by any means or of any size, whether made in the Queen's dominions or not, for the term of his life and seven years after his death, but this right does not affect the right of any other person to represent any scene or object represented by any such painting. If any painting or drawing, or the negative of any photograph, hereinbefore mentioned, is made by the author for or on behalf of any other person for a good or valuable considera- tion, such person is entitled to copyright therein. If any such thing is, after the 29th July, 1862, for any such consideration transferred for the first time by the owner to any other person, * Here is a reference to a note, scheduling the usual subjects of sculpture, but explaining that the section of the law here concerned "is a miracle of intricacy and ver- bosity'' and involves much doubt.— Ed. 48 COP Y RIGHT. the owner may, by an agreement in writing signed at or before the time of such transfer by the transferee, reserve the copyright to him- self, or he may, .by an agreement, in writing signed by himself or by his agent duly author- ized, transfer the copyright to such transferee. (If no such agreement in writing is made, the copyright in such painting ceases to exist.) Article 22. Copyright in Engravings. Every one has for 28 years from the first pub- lishing thereof the sole right and liberty of mul- tiplying, by any means whatever, copies of any print of whatever subject which he has — (a) Invented or designed, graved, etched, or worked in mezzotinto or chiaro-os- curo ; or which he has — (i) From his own work, design, or Invention, caused or procured to be designed, en- graved, etched, or worked in mezzotinto or chiaro-oscuro ; or which he has — (c) Engraved, etched, or worked in mezzo- tinto or chiaro-oscuro, or caused to be engraved, etched, or worked from any picture, drawing, model, or sculpture, either ancient or modern : Provided that such prints are truly engraved with the name of the proprietor on each plate and printed on every print. Prints taken by lithography and other mechan- ical processes are now upon the same footing as engravings. Article 23. The Registration of Books. A book of registry must be kept at Station- ers' Hall, in which the proprietor of copyright in any book, or of the right of representation of any dramatic piece or musical composition. whether in manuscript or otherwise, may upon the payment of a fee of 5j. enter in the register the particulars stated in the form given in the foot-note.* The proprietor of the copyright in any ency- clopzedia, review, magazine, or periodical work, or other work published in a series, is entitled to all the benefit of registration on entering in the book of registry the title of such work, the time of publishing the first volume or part, and the name and place of abode of the proprietor and publisher when the publisher Is not also the proprietor. Every such registered proprietor may assign his interest or any portion of his interest by mak- ing an entry in the said book of such assign- ment in the form given in the foot-note, f Licenses affecting any such copyright may also be registered in the said register. Any person aggrieved by any such entry may apply to the High Court, or any judge thereof, to have such entry expunged or varied, and the court may make such order for that purpose as it thinks just. It is a misdemeanor to make or cause to be made any false entry In such book wilfully. The officer in charge of the book is bound to give sealed and certified copies of the entries contained therein on payment of a fee of 5^. , and such copies are primd facie proof of the matters alleged therein. The fee for the registration of university copy- rights and for copies of them is bd., and they may be inspected wltl^jut fee. Article 24. Effect of Registration in case of Books. No proprietor of copyright in any book can take any proceedings in respect of any infringe- ment of his copyright unless he has, before com- * {a) Original Entry of Proprietorship of Copyright of a Book. Time of making the Entries. Title of the Book. Name of the Publisher and Place of Publication. Name and Place of Abode of the Proprietor of the Copyright. Date of First Publi- cation, + (3) Form of Entry of Assignment of Copyright in any Book previously registered. Date of Entry. Title of Book, Set out the Title and refer to the Page of the Registry Book in which the Original Entry of the Copyright thereof is made. Assignor of Copyright, Assignee of Copyright. COP Y RIGHT. •49 mencing such proceedings, caused an entry to be made in the said register under the last article. The omission to make such entry does not affect the copyright in any book, but only the right to sue or proceed in respect of the infringe- ment thereof. Article 25. Registration in respect of Dramatic Copyright. The remedies which the proprietor of the sole liberty of representing any dramatic piece has under Article 32 are not prejudiced by an omis- sion to make any entry respecting such exclusive right in the said register. Article 26. Registration of Copyright in Paintings, etc. A book entitled the Register of Proprietors of Copyright in Paintings, Drawings, and Photo- graphs, must be kept at the Hall of the Station- ers' Company. A memorandum of every copyright to which any person is entitled under Article 21, and of every subsequent assignment of any such copy- light, must be entered therein ; such memo- randum must contain a statement of : {a) The date of such agreement or assign- ment ; {b) The names of the parties thereto ; (c) The name and place of abode of the person in whom such copyright is vested by virtue thereof, and of the author of the work ; ((/) A short description of the nature and sub- ject of such work, and, if the person registering so desires, a sketch, out- line, or photograph of the work in ad- dition thereto. No proprietor of any such copyright is en- titled to the benefit of 25 & 26 Vict. t. 68 until such registration, and no action can be main- tained, nor any penalty be recovered, in respect of anything done before registration ; but it is not essential to the validity of a registered as- signment that previous assignments should be registered. The three paragraphs of Article 23, relating to the correction of errors in the register, the making of false entries, and the giving of cer- tificates, apply also the book in this article men- tioned. Article 27. Penalties for infringing Copyright in Books. Every one is liable to an action who, in any part of the British dominions — (a) Prints or causes to be printed, either for sale or exportation, any book in which there is subsisting copyright, without the consent in writing of the proprietor ; (*) Imports for sale or hire any such book so having been unlawfully printed from parts beyond the sea ; (c) Knowingly sells, publishes, or exposes to sale or hire, or causes to be sold, pub- lished, or exposed to sale or hire, or has in his possession for sale or hire any book so unlawfully printed or imported. The action must be brought in a Court of Rec- ord and within 12 months after the offence. Article 28. Special Penalty for unlawfully importing Copy- right Books. The following cori^equences are incurred by every one, except the proprietor of the copyright of any book, or some person authorized by him, who imports or brings, or causes to be imported or brought [for sale or hire], into the United Kingdom, or into any other part of the British dominions, any printed book in which there is copyright, first composed, written, or printed [and published] in any part of the United King- dom, and reprinted in any country or place out of the British dominions ; Or, who knowingly sells, publishes, or ex- poses to sale, or lets to hire, or has in his pos- session for sale or hire any such book, that is to say : (a) Every such book is forfeited, and must be seized by every officer of Customs or Excise, and in that case must be de- stroyed by such officer. {b) The person so offending must, upon con- viction before two justices, be fined 10/. for every such offence, and double the value of every copy of any such book in respect of which he commits any such offence. Provided that if the Legislature or proper leg- islative authorities in any British possession pass an Act or make an Ordinance, which, in the opinion of Her Majesty, is sufficient for the pur- 5<^ COPYRIGHT. pose of securing to British authors reasonable protection within such possessions, Her Majesty may approve of such Act, and issue an Order in Council declaring that so long as the provisions of such Act remain in force, the prohibition hereinbefore contained shall be suspended so far as regards such colony. Article 2g. Pirated Copies forfeited to Registered Owner. All copies of any book in which there is a duly registered copyright unlawfully printed or imported without the consent in writing under his hand of the registered proprietor of the copy- right are deemed to be the property of the registered proprietor of such copyright, and he may sue for and recover the same, with damages for the detention thereof, from any person who detains them after a demand thereof in writing. Article 30. Copies of Books to be delivered for Public Libraries, and Penalties for non-delivery. A copy of the first edition and of every subse- quent edition containing additions and altera- tions of every book published in any part of the British dominions must be delivered at the British Museum between 10 a.m. and 4 p.m. on some week-day, other than Ash Wednesday, Good Friday, or Christmas Day, within a month after its publication, if it is published in London, within three months if it is published in the United Kingdom elsewhere than in London, and within 12 months if it is published in any other part of the British dominions. It may be delivered to any person authorized by the Trustees of the British Museum to re- ceive it, and such person must give a receipt in writing therefor.- Copies of every edition of every book pub- lished must, if demanded, be dehvered to an officer of the Stationers' Company for each of the following libraries : the Bodleian Library, the Cambridge University Library, the Advo- cates Library at Edinburgh, and the Library of Trinity College, Dublin. The demand, in writing, must be left at the place of abode of the publisher, within 12 months after the publication of the book, and the copies must be delivered within one month after such demand, either to the Stationers' Company or to the said libraries, or to any one authorized to receive the copies on their behalf. The copy for the British Mujeum must be bound, stitched, or sewed together, and upon the best paper on which the book is printed. The copies for the other libraries mentioned must be upon the paper of which the largest number of copies of the book or edition are printed for sale in the like condition as the copies prepared for sale by the publisher. The copies must in each case include all maps and prints belonging thereto. Any publisher making default in such delivery as is hereinbefore mentioned, is liable to a maximum penalty of 5/. and the value of the copy not delivered. This penalty may be re- covered upon summary proceeding before two justices of the peace, or a stipendiary magis- trate, at the suit of the librarian, or other officer properly authorized, of the library concerned. Article 31. Penalty for Offences against University Copy- Every one incurs the penalties hereinafter mentioned who does any of the following things with any book of which the copyright is vested in any university or college under Article 11 ; (that is to say,) (a) Who prints, reprints, or imports, or causes to be printed, reprinted, or imported, any such book. {t) Knowing the same to be so printed or re- printed, sells, publishes, or exposes to sale, or causes to be sold, published, or exposed to sale, any such book. The penalties for the said offences are : (a) The forfeiture of every sheet being part of such book to the university or col- lege to which the copyright of such book belongs, which university or college must forthwith damask and make waste paper of them. {b) One penny for every sheet found in the custody of such person printing or printed, published or exposed to sale, half to go to the Queen, and half to the informer. None of the penalties aforesaid can be in- curred — ^ Unless the title to the copyright of the book in respect of which the' offence was committed was registered either before 24th June, 1775, or within two months after the time when COP YRIGHT. SI the bequest or gift of the copyright of any book came to the Icnowledge of the vice- chancellor of any university or the head of any college or house of learning ; Or unless the clerk of the Stationers' Com- pany, being duly required to make the entry, refuses to do so, and the university adver- tises such refusal in the Gazette, in which case the clerk incurs a penalty of 20/. to the proprietors of the copyright. The penalty must be sued for in the High Court. Article 32. Penalty for performing Dramatic Pieces. Every person who, without the consent in writing of the author or other proprietor first obtained, represents or causes to be represented at any place of dramatic entertainment in the British dominions any dramatic piece or musical composition is liable to pay to the author or pro- prietor for every such representation an amount not less than 40J., or the full amount of the benefit or advantage arising from such represen- tation, or the injury or loss sustained by the plaintiff therefrom, whichever maybe the greater damages. The penalty may be recovered in any court having jurisdiction in such cases. Article 33. Penalty for Infringetnent of Copyjight in Works of Art. Every one (including the author, when he is not the proprietor) commits an offence who, without the consent of the proprietor of the copy- right therein, does any of the following things with regard to any painting, drawing, or photo- graph in which copyright exists ; (that is to say,) (rt) Repeats, copies, colorably imitates, or otherwise multiplies, for sale, hire, ex- hibition, or distribution, any such work ; or the design thereof ; (/') Causes or procures to be done anything mentioned in (a) ; if) Sells, publishes, lets to hire, exhibits, or distributes, offers for 4ny such purposes, imports into the United Kingdom any such repetition, copy, or other imitation of any such work or of the design there- of, knowing that it has been unlawfully made ; ((/) Causes or procures to be done, any of the things mentioned in (r) ; I {e) Fraudulently signs or otherwise affixes or fraudulently causes to be signed or otherwise affixed to or upon any paint- ing, drawing, or photograph or the neg- ative thereof, any name, initials, or monogram. (_/") Fraudulently sells, publishes, exhibits, or disposes of, or offers for sale, exhibi- tion, or distribution, any painting, draw- ing, or photograph, or negative of a photograph, having thereon the name, initials, or monogram of a person who did not execute or make such work ; {g) Fraudulently utters, disposes of, or puts off, or causes to be uttered or disposed of, any copy or colorable imitation of any painting, drawing, or photograph, or negative of a photograph, whether there is subsisting copyright therein or not, as having been made or executed by the author or makers of the original work from which such copy or imita- tion has been taken ; {h) Makes or knowingly sells, publishes, or offers for sale, any painting, drawing, or photograph which after being sold or parted with by the author or maker thereof, has been altered by any other person by addition or otherwise, or any copy of such work so altered, or of any part thereof, as the unaltered work of such author or maker during his life and without his consent. Every one who commits any of the offences ('^). (^). ('■)i or C'^) forfeits to the proprietor of the copyright for the time being a sum not ex- ceeding 10/., and all such repetitions, copies, and imitations made without such consent as afore- said, and all negatives of photographs made for the purpose of obtaining such copies. Every one who commits any of the offences Wi (/)> {S)< o"^ (''') forfeits to the person ag- grieved a sum not exceeding 10/., or double the price, if any, at which all such copies, engrav- ings, imitations, or altered works were held or offered for sale, and all such copies, engravings, imitations, and altered works are forfeited to the person whose name, initials, or monogram are fraudulently signed or affixed, or to whom such spurious or altered work is fraudulently or falsely ascribed ; provided that none of the last- mentioned penalties are incurred unless the per- son to whom such spurious or altered work is so S2 COP YRIGHT. fraudulently ascribed, or whose initials, name, or monogram is so fraudulently or falsely as- cribed, was living at or within 20 years next be- fore the time when the offence was committed. The penalties hereinbefore specified are cumu- lative, and the person aggrieved by any of the acts before mentioned may recover damages in addition to such penalties, and may in any case recover and enforce the delivery to him of the things specified, and recover damages for their retention or conversion. The penalties may be recovered either by action or before two justices or a stipendiary magistrate. Article 34. Im-portation of pirated Works of Art prohibited. The importation into the United Kingdom of repetitions, copies, or imitations of paintings, drawings, or photographs wherein, or in the de- sign whereof, there is an existing copyright under 25 & 26 Vict. c. 68, or of the design thereof, or of the negatives of photographs, is absolutely prohibited, except by the consent of the proprietor of the copyright or his agent au- thorized in writing. Article 35. Penalty for pirating Lectures. Every person commits an offence who, hav- ing obtained or made a copy of any lecture, prints or otherwise copies and publishes the same, or causes it to be so dealt with without the leave of the author or his assigns ; Or, who, knowing it to have been printed or copied or published without such consent, sells, publishes, or exposes it to sale or causes it to be so dealt with ; Every person who commits such offence for- feits such printed or copied lectures, together with one penny for every sheet thereof found in his custody, half to the Queen and half to the informer. The printing and publishing of any lecture in any newspaper without leave is an offence' within the meaning of this article. This section does not apply to the publication of lectures which have been printed and pub- lished as books at the time of such publication. The penalty must be sued for in the High Court. Article 36. Penalty for pirating Sculptures. Every person is liable to an action for dam- ages who makes or imports, or causes to be made or imported, or exposed to sale, or other- wise disposed, anything of which the copyright is protected by the 54 Geo. c. 56. This article does not apply to any person who purchases the right or property of anything pro- tected by the said Act of the proprietor by a deed in writing, signed by him with his own hand in the presence of and attested by two credible wit- nesses. Article 37. Penalty for pirating Prints and Engravings. Every person commits an offence who, with- out the consent of the proprietor in writing, signed by him and attested by two witnesses — (a) In any manner copies and sells, or causes or procures to be copied and sold, in whole or in part, any copyright print ; or (If) Prints, reprints, or imports for sale any such print, or causes or procures any such print to be so dealt with ; or ( for the benefit of persons interested in similar works first published in Her Majesty's domin- ions. Article 39. Orders in Council as to International Copyright. Her Majesty may by Order in Council (stating as the ground for issuing the same that such protection as aforesaid has been secured as afore- said) direct that the authors of all or any of the things mentioned in the last Article, being first published in any such foreign country as is men- tioned in that Article, shall have copyright therein in Her Majesty's dominions for a term, to be specified in the Order, not exceeding the term of copyright which authors of things of the same kind first published in the United Kingdom are entitled by law at the date of the Order. The terms so to be specified and the terms for registration and delivery of copies of books as hereinafter mentioned may be different for works first published in dififerent foreign coun- tries, and for dififerent classes of such works. Article 40. Term of International Copyright. The authors of the works specified in the Order are entitled to copyright therein as follows — Under 5 & 6 Vict. c. 45, and the other Acts relating to copyright in books, except the sections relating to the deposit of copies in certain libraries, if the works specified in the Order are books ; Under the Engraving Copyright Acts, the Sculpture Copyright Acts, or the Paintings Copyright Act respectively, if the works specified in the Order are prints, engrav- ings, articles of sculpture, pictures, draw- ings, or photographs ; Under the Dramatic Copyright Acts, provided that such copyright does not extend to pre- vent fair imitations or adaptations to the English stage of any dramatic piece or musical composition published in any for- eign country, if the works specified in the Order are dramatic pieces or musical com- positions, unless the order directs that it shall extend to them. Subject in each case to such limitations as to the duration of the right as may be specified in the Order, and subject also to the provisions hereinafter contained. Article 41. No Work Copyright without Registration. No author of any such work as is referred to in this chapter is entitled to any benefit under the provisions contained in it, unless such work is registered, and a copy of the first edition and of every subsequent edition containing additions or alterations, but of no other editions of it, is delivered at the Hall of the Stationers' Com- pany, within a time to be specified in the Order of Council, and in the manner prescribed in the schedule in the footnote hereto.* *SCH The register must show if the work ib — A book Dramatic piece or music- al composition printed. Dramatic piece or music- al composition in MS. Print. The title. Do. Do. Sculpture Descriptive title Painting, ■ drawing, or i Short description of photograph. nature and subject of work, and a sketch outline or photograph thereof, if the person registering pleases. Name and place of abode of author (unless the book is anonymous, 7 & 8 Vict. c. 12. s. 7). Do. Do., Do. of inventor, de signer, or engraver. Do. of maker. Name and author. Time and place of first publication. Do. and time and place of first repre- sentation or per- formance. Do. First publi- cation in foreign country. Do. 54 COP YRIGHT. The three paragraphs preceding the last par- agraph of Article 23 apply to such entries. The copy so delivered must within one month of its delivery be deposited in the British Mu- seum by the officer of the Stationers' Company. Article 42. No International Copyrightin Newspaper Articles. Articles of political discussion published in any newspaper, or periodical, in any foreign country may, if the source from which the same are taken is acknowledged, be republished or translated in any newspaper or periodical in this country, notwithstanding anything hereinbefore or hereinafter contained. Articles on other subjects so published may be dealt with in the same manner on the same condition, unless the author has signified his in- tention of preserving the copyright therein, and the right of translating the same, in some con- spicuous part of the newspaper or periodical in which the same was first published, in which case such publication is to be regarded as a book within the meaning of Article. Article 43. Translations of Foreign Books. Her Majesty may by Order in Council direct that the authors of books published, and of dramatic pieces first publicly represented, in the foreign countries referred to in Article 38, may, for a period not exceeding five years from the publication of an authorized translation thereof, prevent the publication in the British dominions of any unauthorized translation thereof, and, in the case of dramatic pieces, the public represen- tation of any such translation. Upon the publication of such Order the law in force for the time being for preventing the in- fringement of copyright, and the sole right of representing dramatic pieces, in the British do- minions applies to the prevention of the publica- tion of such unauthorized translation. Provided that no such Order prevents fair im- itations or adaptations to the English stage of any dramatic piece or musical composition pub- lished in any foreign country. But Her Majesty may by Order in Council direct that this proviso shall not apply to the dramatic pieces protected under the original Order in Council. If a book is published in parts, each part is re- garded, for the purposes of this article, as a sep- arate book. Article 44. Conditions of International Copyright in Transla- tions. No author, and no personal representative of any author, is entitled to the benefit of the pro- visions of the last preceding article unless he complies with the following requisitions : 1. The original work from which the transla- tion is to be made must be registered, and a copy thereof deposited in the United Kingdom, in the manner required for original works by the said Inter- national Copyright Act, within three calendar months of its first publication in the foreign country : 2. The author must notify on the title-page of the original work, or, if it is published in parts, on the title-page of the first part, or, if there is no title-page, on some conspicuous part of the work, that it is his intention to reserve the right of trans- lating it : 3. The translation sanctioned by the author, or a part thereof, must be published either in the country mentioned in the Order in Council by virtue of which it is to be protected, or in the British do- minions, not later than one year after the registration and deposit in the United Kingdom of the original work, and the whole of such translation must be pub- lished within three years of such regis- tration and deposit : 4. Such translation must be registered, and a copy thereof deposited in the United Kingdom, within a time to be mentioned in that behalf in the Order by which it is protected, and in the manner provided by the said International Copyright Act for the registration and deposit of orig- inal works : 5. In the case of books published in parts, each part of the original work must be registered and deposited in this country, in the manner required by the said In- ternational Copyright Act, within three months after the first publication thereof in the foreign country : 6. In the case of dramatic pieces the transla- tion sanctioned by the author must be published within three calendar months of the registration of the original wotk ; COPYRIGHT. 55 7- The above requisitions apply to articles originally published in newspapers or periodicals, if the same be afterward published in a separate form, but not to such articles as originally published. Article 45. Importation of Pirated IVorks. The importation into any part of the British dominions of copies of any work of literature or art, the copyright in which is protected by the provisions of this chapter, and of unauthorized translations thereof, is absolutely prohibited, un- less the registered proprietor ol the copyright therein, or his agent authorized in writing, con- sents, and the provisions of Article 28 apply to the importation of such copies into any part of the British dominions. The undersigned American citizens who earn their living in whole or in part by their pen, and who are put at disadvantage in their own country by the publication of foreign books without payment to the author, so that American books are undersold in the American market, to the detriment of American literature, urge the passage by Congress of an International Copyright Law, which will protect the rights of -authors, and will enable American writers to ask from foreign nations the justice we shall then no longer deny on our own part. ^ICMA^ ../^^^^. t^^:t>t^ ^ ^M4r lo'jjjjLA>^>v^wt^ (WJU^ , £r,3. '^4~^H. '0-. ^Z-c^C^if-^Cji^ ^l-^'ir-^f /^C€^ lfSk>^^\y,^ Kat £te^ CL-ny> -^X:)Q^^^JV^XA> '^'/vo.a/vaaJc, |v, Cccu^ r^ '^'^ 't^. CKi^JWJ, (^Ui^ c^ 7^^2^ 'z&ufte^. ^/^tyct^^rl — ^^^^XAi^i-^K^^-Wl^^^ jYJ^^^SLj^ '^♦^^^"^/^rO ji-oi^e^J^^Ljvi^ fry^ t£^:^"^^Yf^ /h: M. misiifi^ "/ ' j^w^ d- k^-iwvA;^-*^ w/C(hr. /T^^^vw^-^ {Xax^^'?^ ^*-KV^<^-lO ^^^Z^,,U^ ^/^^^n..^>cUj^ IMju^Uj^ J^/j^<^,^,^^fer y^^^<>^^^ - ^fi;^ ^ :m^..^^^^^^:^^^^ <==^-/ ^e- «>ux»^ •7.^<^^-oc. /^. l^\^ (hZ *^^AA\ '1^^/^^>^^ '^croY'U />'«_^t<_ ^ "- ■ /CiJ-(-^ 6.1/ S, '/^. Paris, no. 18, 15 juin 1879, P- 454, 4SS. Flourens (Abel). Origine et dfeveloppement en France de la legislation sur les droits d'auteur. Commentaire de la loi de 1866. 8°. Paris, F. Pichon, 1874. Folleville (Daniel de). See Daniel de FoUe- ville. Fonscolombe (Henri de). Essai sur la propri- 6te litteraire. 8°. Paris, Marescq, 1880. Fontpertuis (Adalbert Front de). See Fliniaux (Charles). La proprieie industrielle et la pro- priete litteraire. Foucher (Victor). De la propriete litteraire et de la contrefa9on. 8°. Paris, 1837. Note. Originally published in " Revue ^trangire et fran- caise de legislation et d'oeconomie politique." v. 4. 8*", Paris, 1837, p. 321—, 361—, 506—, 573—. LITERARY PROPERTY. 13 FoucHER (Victor). Le Congrfes de la propriStS J, littSraire et artistique i Bruxelles. [1858]. In " Revue contemporaine." yhme ann^e, 2e s^rie. V. 5. 8°. Paris, 1858, p. 812-853. Same. About I36 p. 12°. Paris, M. L6vy frferes, 1858. Frage (Die) des literarischen eigentliums. [Anon.] In " Unsere zeit. Deutsche revue der gegenwart." Neue folge. 2ter jahrgang. iste halfte. 8°. Leipzig, 1866, p. 801-823. France. Commission tie la profrie'U littiraire. Collection des procfes-verbaux. About 348 p. 4°. Paris, Pillet atn6, 1826. Rapport de la commission charg^e de preparer un projet de loi sur la propri6t6 litt^r- aire. 8°. Paris, 1826. Anon, notice with translation of the report: French law of literary properly. /«" The Jurist." v. i. 8". London, March 1827, p. 113-120. See also Auger (Louis Simon). — Cham- pein (Marie Frangois Stanislas).— Lally Tol- lendal (Trophine Gferard, marquis de). — Le- mercier (N6pomuc6ne Louis). — Portalis (Le comte Joseph Marie). Ministlre d'itat. (Commision de la profriiU litUraire et artistique^ Dfecrets, discours de s. exc. le ministre d'6tat. Legislation. Docu- ments. About 44 p. 4°, Paris, imp, Panc- koucke & cie, 1862. Rapports i I'erapereur. Ddcrets. Collection des procfes-verbaux. Documents. 2B6 p. I 1. 4°. Paris, imprimerie imp6riale, 1863. Fraser (James). A handy-book of patent and copyright law English and foreign for the use of inventors, patentees, authors, and pub- lishers, xvi, 242 p. 12°. London, S. Low, Son, & CO., i860. [Copyright, p. 168-228.] Anon, notice in "The Jurist." N. s, v, 7, part 2. 8". London, no. 322, March 9, 1861, p. 97. Fresquet (Raymond de). See Nion (Alfred). Friedlander (Max). Der einheimische und auslandische rechtsschutz gegen nachdruck und nachbildung. Rechtswissenschaftliche und fiir den praktischen gebrauch bestimmte darstellung der heutigen gesetzgebung und des internationalen rechts zum schutz schrift- stellerischer und ktinstlerischer erzeugnisse. About XV, 227 p, 8°, Leipzig, Brockhaus, 1857. Froude (James Anthony). The copyright com- mission. [Anon.] In " The Edinburgh re- view." V. 148. 8°. Edinburgh, no. 304, Oct. 1878, p. 295-343. Further reasons addressed to parliament [etc.] 1737. See Carte (T:) Gambart (Ernest). On piracy of artistic copy- right. 8°. London, W. Tegg, 1863. Anon, notice in " The Art-journal," N. s. v. 2. 4°. Lon- don, June I, 1863, p. 128. — Anon, review in " The Athe- njeum." 4**. London, no. 1862, July 4, 1863, p. 16, 17. Garnier (Joseph). See Calmels (Antoine Edouard). Gastambide (Joseph Adrien). Hlstorique et thfeorie de la propri6t6 des auteurs. 132 p. 8°. Paris, Cosse & Marchal, 1862. Traits thfeorique et pratique des contre- fagons en tous genres, ou de la propriety en matiSre de littferature, theatre, musique, pein- ture, dessin, etc. viii, 496 p. 8°. Paris, Legrand & Descauriet, 1837. Review by Louis Nigon de Berty in " Revue €trangSre et fran^aise de legislation et d'oeconomie politique." v. 4. 8°. Paris, 1837, p. B^i-seg. Gay (Jules). Ce qu'on appelle la propiSte lit- tferaire est nuisible aux auteurs, aux editeurs et au public. 8°. Paris, J. Gay, 1862. Gerber (Karl Friedrich von). Ueber die na- tur d. rechte d. schriftstellers und verlegers. In " Jahrbiicher fiir die dogmatik d. heutigen romischen und deutschen privatrechts. Her- ausgegeben von R. Jhering." v. 3. 8°. Jena. Gerhard (Frederick). Will the people of the United States be benefited by an international copyright law, or, will such a law be an injury to them ? 27 p. 8°. New York, 1868. Note. The author thinks an international copyright law would not be a benefit, but an injury to the people of the United States. Germany. Bericht der 6. koramission iiber den gesetz-entwurf, betrefFend das geistige urheberrecht an schriftwerken u. s. w. nebst zusammenstellung der prasidial-vorlagen mit den von der kommission gefassten beschlus- sen. About 27 p. fol. Berlin, Kortkampf, 1870. [Aktenstiicke des Reichstags. Session 1870, nr. 7.] Entwurf eines gesetzes betreffend, a. das urheberrecht von schriftwerken, abbildungen &c. b. schutz der photographien gegen un- befugte nachbildung mit motiven. About 25 p. fol. Berlin, Kortkampf, 1870. [Akten- stucke des Reichstags. Session 1870, nr. 3.] Gesetz, betrefFend das urheberrecht an schriftwerken, abbildungen, musikalischen kompositionen und dramatischen werken. Vom ir. Juni 1870. In Bundes-Gesetzblatt des Norddeutschen bundes. 1870. 4°, Berlin, No. 19, p. 339-353- Same. About 15 p. 8°. Berlin, von Deck er, 1870. Same. About 24 p. 16°. Berlin, Kort- kampf, 1870. Same : Nach den amtlichen materialien erlautert und mit ausfuhrl. alphabet, sach- register versehen, fiir den praktischen hand- gebrauch herausgegeben von Robert Fischer. About xvi, 52 p. 8°. Gera, Griesbach, 1870. Same. 2. Aufl. About xvi, 52 p. 8°. Gera, Griesbach, 1872. Same : Mit den vertrSgen zum schutz des geistigen eigenthums zwischen Deutschland und Italien, der Schweiz, England, Frank- reich und Belgien. Von Wilhelm Endemann. About 152 p. 8°. Berlin, Kortkampf, 1871. Same : Erlautert von Otto Dambach. About iv, 298 p. 8°. Berlin. T, C. F, Enslin, 1871. 14 LITERARY PROPERTY. Germany. Same : Systematisch dargestellt von Rudolf Klosterraann. About iii, 74 p. 8°. Berlin, Guttendag, 1871. Same : Loi du 11 juin 1870 concernant le droit d'auteur. Traduction et notes de Paul Gide. In Annuaire de legislation 6trang6re. 1870-1871. 8° Paris, 1872, p. 205-223. Loi du 9 Jan. — 11 Jan. 1876 concernant le droit d'auteur. Notice, traduction et notes par Andrfe Morillot. In Annuaire de legisla- tion fetrangfere. 1876. 8°. Paris, 1877. p. 88-134. Germond de Lavigne (Leopold Alfred Gabriel). La protection de la propriety littSraire k retranger. Conference faite au Cercle de la librairie, le 18 mars 1881. About 24 p. 8°. Paris, Fillet et Dumoulin, 1 88 1. Gide (Paul). See Germany. Loi du 11 juin 1870 concernant le droit d'auteur. Gilder (R: Watson). See Scribner's monthly. GoDKiN (Edwin Lawrence). See Nation (The). Godson (R:) A practical treatise on the law of patents for inventions and of copyright ; with an introductory book on monopolies; illus- trated with notes of the principal cases, xxxiv p. I 1. 452 p. 8°. London, for J. Butter- worth & Son, 1823. Same : With an abstract of the laws in force in foreign countries. 2d ed. xxxv, 496, 118 p. 8°. London, Saunders & Ben- ning, 1840. Same: 2d ed., to which is added a sup- plement, containing the law to the present time. I p. 1. [xxxv], 496, 94 p. viii, 158 p. 8°. London, W. Benning & Co., 1844. Same : Supplement, with an abstract of the laws in force in America, Spain, Austria, Netherlands, and France. 8°, London, 1832. Same: A supplement to the 2d edition of A practical treatise on the law of patents for inventions and of copyright, viii, 158 p. 8°. London, W. Benning & Co., 1844. De la propriety litteraire et du droit de copie en gfenferal, ou du droit de propriety dans ses rapports avec la littferature et les arts en Angleterre. Traduction de I'Anglais, par Theodore Regnault. 8°. Paris, Waree, 1826. See also Burke (P:) A supplement to Godson's practical treatise on patents and copyright. 1851. Goepel (Ernst). Ueber begriff und wesen des urheberrechtes. Inaugural dissertation, Jena. 54 P- i2°- Altenburg, S. Geibel & co., 1881. GoLTDAMMER (Dr. — ). Ueber die strafbare nachbildung von kunstwerken. About 43 p. 8°. Berlin, von Decker, 1864. [Aus Archiv fur preussisches strafrecht besonders abge- druckt.] GoujET (Charles) «»^ Merger (C. B.) Diction- naire de droit commercial. 2e ed., mise en harmonie avec la legislation nouvelle jusqu'au 30 mars 1852. v. 4. 8° Paris, A. Marescq, and Cotillon, 1852. _ Contains; Propriety artistique, p. 298-323. Proprietc litt^raire, p. 363-411. GoujON (Alexandre Marie). Essai sur la ga- rantie des proprietes litteraires. 8° Paris, Goujon, 1801. GouRNOT (Achilla Louis). Du principe des droits d'auteur etde la perpetuite. 2 p. 1. 48 p. 8°. Paris, E. Dentu, 1862. Govi (Gilberto). Delia proprieti intellettuale, considerazioni di G. Govi. About 16 p. 8°. Firenze, tip. Cellini, 1867. Graff (Er. Mor.) Versuch einer erlauternden darstellung des eigenthums und der eigen- thumsrechte des schriftstellers und des ver- legers und ihrer gegenseitigen rechte und ver- bindlichkeiten. 8°. Leipzig, Wienbrack, 1794- Graham (Catherine Sawbridge). See Macaulay (Mrs. Catherine Sawbridge). Great Britain. Acts relating to copy right in books, 8 Ann. [1708-9] c. 19. 15 Geo. 3. [1774- 5] c. 53. 41 Geo. 3. [1800-1] c. 107. 28 p. 12°. London, G. Eyre & A. Strahan, i8i2. Acts relating to literary and artistic copy- right. In The Statutes. Revised ed. 15 v. sm. fol. London, 1871-78. Summary/ : v. 2. An act for the encouragement of the arts of designing, engraving, and etching historical and other prints, by vesting the properties thereof in the in- ventors and engravers. 8 Geo. II. 1734-5, chap. r3, p. 399, 400. An act to amend and render more effectual an act made in 8 Geo. II. for encouragement of the arts of designing, engraving, and etching prints. 7 Geo. III. 1766-7, chap. 38, p. 707, 708. — V. 3. An act for enabling the two universities m England, the four universities in Scotland and the several colleges of Eton, Westminster and Winchester, to hold in perpetuity their copy right in books. 15 Geo. III. 1774-S, chap. 53, p. 81-84. An act for more effectually securing the property of prints to invent- ors and engravers, by enabling them to sue for and re- cover penalties in certain cases. 17 Geo. III. 1776-7, chap. 57, p. 130, 131. — v. 5. An act to amend and render more effectual an act of his present majesty for encouraging the art of making new models and casts of busts and other things therein mentioned. 54 Geo. III., i8th May 1814, chap. 56, p. 29T, 292. — V. 7. An act to amend the laws relating to dramatic literary property. 3*4 Will. IV., loth June 1833, chap. 15, p. 353, 356. An act for preventing the publication of lectures without consent. 5 & 6 Will. IV., gth Sept. 1835, chap 6s, p. 898, 899. An act to extend the protection of copyright in prints and en- gravings to Ireland. 6 & 7 Will. IV., 13th Aug. 1836, chap. 59, p. 1055, 1056. An act to repeal so much of an act of the S4 Geo. III. respecting copyrights, as requires the deliveiy of a copy of every published book to the li- braries of Sion college, the four universities of Scotland, and of the King's Inns in Dublin. 6& 7 Will. IV., 20th Aug, 1836, chap, no, p. ir75, T176.— v. 8. An act to amend the law of copyright. 5*6 Vict., 1st July 1842, chap. 4Si p. 1152-1162. Abstract z« " The Jurist." v. 6, part 3. 8". London, no. 291, Aug. 6, 1842, p. 278-281. — v. g. An act to amend the law relating to international copy- right. 7 & 8 Vict., loth May, 1844, chap. 12, p. 224-232. —V. 10. An act to amend the law relating to the protectum HI the colonies of works entitled to copyright in the United Kingdom. 10 & 11 Vict., 22d July, 1847, chap. 95, p. 275, 276.— V. 11. An act to enable her majesty to carry into ef- fect a convention with France on the subject of copy- right ; to extend and explain the international copyright acts J and to explain the acts relating to copyright in en- gravings. 15 & 16 Vict., aSth May 1852, chap, la, p. 283-287J— V. 14. An act for amending the law relating to copyright in works of the fine arts, and for repressing the commission of fraud in the production and sale of such works. 25 & if, Vict., 29th July i86a, chap. 68, p. 163- LITERARY PROPERTY. IS 167. Same in " The Journal of the Society of arts.'' v. 10. sm. 4". London, no. 507, Aug. 8, 1862, p. 592-594. Great Britain. Same. In " The Law reports. The public general statutes, v. 1-17. 8°. London, 1866-81. Sujnmary .- v. 10. An act to amend the law relating to international copyright. 38 Vict., 13th May 1875, chap. 12, p. T33, 134. An act to give effect to an act of the Par- liament of the dominion of Canada respecting copyright. 38 & 39 Vict., 2d Aug. 187s, chat). 53, p. 338-345. An act to amend the copyright of designs act. [Copyright in sculpture.] 38 & 39 Vict., 13th Aug. 1875, chap. 93, p. 1042-1044. — V. II. An act to consolidate the customs laws. 39 & 40 Vict., 24th July 18^6, chap. 36. sections 42, 44, 45 & 152 : Importation of foreign reprints of copyright books, p. 181, 183 & 210. Extracts from the evidence taken before the select committee of the House of Com- mons, on the copyright acts, in April and May, 1818. 16 p. 8°. London, Strahan & Spottis- woode, [1818.] Same. 22 p. 8°. [London, Barnard & Far- ley, i8i8.] Legislative documents relating to literary and artistic copyright. 1800-1880. In Par- liamentary papers : Bills ; Reports from com- mittees ; Accounts and papers, fol. London, 1800-80. Note. — Papers, etc., relating to the copyright of designs have been omitted. Summary : A bill for securing the copyright of printed books to authors or their assigns. Parliamentary papers, V. I. Session 1801, no. 112. A bill for securing copies of books to universities, and copyrights to authors. Par. pap. v. 1. Sess. 1808, no. 314 and 321. A bill to amend the several acts for securing copyrights. Par. pap. v. 2. Sess, 1813-1814, no. 184, 2x4, 307 and 321. A bill to amend an act passed in the 54Lh year of the reign of his present majesty, intituled, ** An act_ to amend the several acts for the encouragement of learning, by securing the copies and copyright of printed books to the authors of such books, or their assigns." Ordered, by the House of Cqmmons, to be printed, 16 March, 1818. 2 p. z 1. Par. pap. v. i : Bills. Sess. 27 Jan.-io June 1818, no. 126. A bill to alter and extend the provisions of the 54th George third, cap. 156, with respect to dramatic writings. Ordered, by the H. of C.,to be printed, 24 Feb. 1830. 6 p. Par. pap. v. 2 : Bills v. a. Sess. 5 Feb.-23 July 1830, no. 78. A bill to authorize the purchase of the rights of literary property enjoyed by the King's and Marischal colleges in Aberdeen. C5rdered, by the H. of C , to be printed, i Aug. 1832. 4 p. Par. pap. v. i : Bills v. 1. Sess. 6 Dec. 1831-16 Aug. 1832, no. 670. A bill to amend the laws relating to dramatic literary property. Ordered, by the H. of C., to be printed, 13 March 1833. 4 p. Par, pap, v. 2 : Bills v. 2. Sess. 2 Jan. -29 Aug. 1833, no. 73. A bill, intituled, an act for preventing the publication -of lectures without consent. Ordered, by the H. of C, to be printed, 20 Aug. 1835. 2 p. i 1. Par. pap. v. 3 : Bills V. 3. Sess 19 Feb. -10 Sep. 1835, no. 546. A bill to repeal so much of an act of the fifty-fourth year of king George the third, commonly called "The copy- right act," as requires the gratuitous delivery of eleven copies of every published book to eleven of the public li- braries of the kingdom, in the said act named, and to provide other means for the encouragement of learning. (Prepared and brought in by mr. Buckingham, colonel Thompson and mr. Ewart.) Ordered, by the H. of C, to be printed, 10 May 1836. 4 p. Par. pap. v. 2 : Bills v. 2. Sess. 4 Feb.-2o Aug. 1836, no. 252. — Same. As amended by the committee. Ordered, by the H. of C, to be print- ed, 14 July 1836, 2 pp. I 1. Par. pap. v, z : Bills v, 2, Sess. 4 Feb.-2o Aug. 1836, no. 441. A bill to extend the protection of copyright in prints and engravings to Ireland. (Prepared and brought in by mr. Buckingham and mr, Aglionby.) Ordered, by the H. of C, to be printed, 14 June 1836. z p. Par. pap. v. 2 ; Bills v, 2, Sess. 4 Feb,-2o Aug. 1836, no. 333.— ^aw^ As amended by the committee. Ordered, by the H. of C, to be printed, 11 July 1836. 2 p. Par. pap. v. 2 : Bills v. a. Sess. 4 Feb, -20 Aug. 1836, no. 431. A bill to consolidate and amend the laws relating to copyright in printed books, musical compositions, acted dramas and engravings, to provide remedies for the viola- tion thereof, and to extend the term of its dui'ation. (Pre- pared and brought in by mr. serjeant Talfourd, mr. chan- cellor of the exchequer, lord viscount Mahon, and sir Robert Harry Inglis,) Ordered, by the H, of C., to be printed, 6 June 1837. 16 p. Par. pap. v. i : Bills v. i. Sess. 31 Jan.-i7 July 1837, no. 380. A bill to amend the law refating to copyright. (Pre- pared and brought in by mr. serjeant Talfourd, lord vis- count Mahon, sir Robert Inglis, and mr. chancellor of the exchequer. Ordered, by the H. of C, to be printed, 37 Feb. 1838. 14 p. I 1. Par. pap. v. i : Bills v. i, Sess, 15 Nov. 1837-16 Aug. 1838, no. 164. — Same. As amended by the committee. Ordered, by the H. of C, to be printed, 6 June 1838. 18 p. Par. pap. v, 1; Bills v. i. Sess. 15 Nov. 1837-16 Aug, 1838, no. 461. — Notice in " Tait^s Edinburgh magazine," v. 5, n. s. 8°. Edinburgh, no. 53, May 1838, p. 332-334- A btU for securing to authors, in certain cases, the bene- fit of international copyright. (Prepared and brought in by mr, Poulett Thomson and lord John Russell.) Ordered, by the H. of C, to be printed, 11 April 1838. 6 p. Par. pap. v. I : Bills v. i. Sess. 15 Nov. 1837-16 Aug. 1838, no. 295.— Sawff, As amended by the committee. Ordered, by the H. of C, to be printed, 8 June 1838. 6 p. Par. pap. V. I : Bills v. 1. Sess. 15 Nov, 1837-16 Aug. 1838, no. 5c^. A bill to amend the law of copyright. (Prepared avd brought in by mr. serjeant Talfourd, mr. chancellor of the exchequer, sir Robert Harry Inglis, and lord viscount Mahon,) Ordered, by the H. of C, to be printed, 12 Feb. 1839. 18 p. Par. pap. v. i: Bills v. i, Sess. 5 Feb.-z? Aug. 1839, no. XQ. A bill to amend the law of copyright. (Prepared and brought in by mr. serjeant Talfourd, sir Robert Harry In- flis, lord viscount Mahon, and mr. Gladstone.) Ordered, y the H. of C, to be printed, 11 Feb. 1840. z6 p. i 1. Par. pap. v. i : Bills v. i, Sess. 16 Jan.-ii Aug. 1840, no. 61. — Same, Ordered, by the H. of C, to be printed, 29 Jan. 1S41. 16 p. I 1. Par. pap. v. i *. Bills v. i. Sess. 26 Jan. -22 June 1841, no. 6. A bill for the registering of cojiyrights and assignments thereof, and for the better securing the property therein. (Prepared and brought in by mr. Godson and mr. Bulkeley Hughes.) Ordered, by the H. of C, to be printed, 8 Feb. 1842. 4 p. I 1. Par. pap. v. i : Bills v. z. Sess. 3 Feb.-i2 Aug. 1842, no. 9. — A non. re.vieiv in " The Jurist. V. 6, part 2. 8". London, 1842, no. 267, Feb. 19, p. 49, 50: no 271, March 19, p. 89-91 : no, 276, April 23, p. 141, 142. A bill to amend the law of copyright. (Prepared and brought in by viscount Mahon, sir Robert Harry Inglis, mr. Gladstone, and mr. Charles Howard.) Ordered, by the H. of C, to be printed, 4 March 1S42. 16 p. x 1. Far. pap. v. i : Bills v. i. Sess. 3 Feb.-i2 Aug. 1842, no 79. — Same As amended by the committee. Ordered, by the H. of C, to be printed, 23 March 1842. z8 p. Far. pap. V. I : Bills v. z. Sess. 3 Feb.~zz Aug. 1842, no. 139. — Same As amended by the committee, and on re-commit- ment. Ordered, by the H. of C, to be printed, 21 April 1842. z6 p. Par. pap. v. z : Bills v. i. Sess. 3 Feb.-i2 Aug. 1842, no. Z94. — Satne. Amendments made by the lords. (Ordered, by the H. of C, to be printed, 27 June 1842. 4 p. Par. pap. v. i : Bills v. i, Sess. 3 Feb.-za Aug. 1842, no 370. A bill to amend the law relating to international copy- right. (Prepared and_ brought in by mr. Greene, mr. Gladstone, and mr. Bingham Baring.) Ordered, by the H. of C, to be printed, 12 March 1844. iz p. i 1. Par. pap. V. z : Bills v. i. Sess. z Feb. -5 Sept. Z844, no. loi. A bil* to amend the law relating to the protection in the colonies of works entitled to cop^^right in the United Kingdom. (Prepared and brought in by mr. Milner Gib- son and mr. Parker.) Ordered, by the H. of C, to be printed, i July Z847. 2 p. i. 1. Par. pap. v. i : Bills v. i. Sess. 19 Jan .-23 July 1847, no. 598. A bill to enable her majesty to carry into effect a con- vention with France on the subject of copyright ; to extend the international copyright act \ and to explain the acts relating to copyright in engravings. (Prepared and brought in by mr. Labouchere and mr. attorney general.) Ordered, by the H. of C, to be printed, x8 Feb. 1852, z p, I, 8 p. Par, pap. v. i : Bills v. x. Sess, 3 Feb.-i July 1852, no, 85, LITERARY PROPERTY. A bill for consolidating the laws relating to copyright in works of literature and art. (Prepared and brought in by mr. Wilson and the chancellor of the exchequer.) Ordered, by the H. of C, to be printed, 20 July 185^. I p, 1. 23 p. Par. pap. v. i : Bills v. j. Sess. 30 April- 28 Aug. 1857, no 142. — Criticism in " The Jurist." N. s. V. 3, part 2. 8°. London, no. 134, Aug i, 1857, p. 311- 316, A bill for amending the law relating to copyright in works of the fine arts, and for repressing the commission of fraud in the production and sale of such works. (Pre- pared and brought in by mr, Massey, mr. attorney general, sir George Lewis, and mr. solicitor general.) Ordered, by the H. of C, to be printed, 15 April 1861. i p. I. 12 p. Par. pap. v. i : Bills v. i, Sess. 5 Feb.-6 Aug. i86t, no. 104. — Same (Prepared by mr. Massey, mr. solicitor general, and mr. attorney general.) Ordered, by the H. of C., to be printed, 27 Feb. 1862. 8 p. Par. pap, v. i : Bills v.z. Sess. 6 Feb.-? Aug. 1862, no. 26. — Same K% amended in committee. Ordered, by the H. of C, to be printed, 20 March 1S62. i p. I. 6 p. 1 1. Par. pap. v. i : Bills V. I. Sess. 6 Feb.-? Aug. 1862, no. 53. — Notices in " The Athenaeum" 4**, London, i86z, no. 1814, Aug. 2, p. 146, 147 : no. 1815, Aug. 9, p. 180 : no. 1829, Nov. 15, p. 630, 631. A bill to consolidate and amend the acts relating to copyright in works of literature and the fine arts. (Pre- pared and brought in by mr. Black, mr. Stirling, and mr. Massey.) Ordered, by the H. of C, to be printed, 6 April 1864. I p. 1. 24 p. 1 1. Par. pap. v. i : Bills v. i. Sess. 4 Feb.-29 July 1864, no. 59. — Sa^me in "The Jurist. N. s. V. 10, part 2. 8°. London, 1864, no. 485, •April 23, p. 146-148 : no. 486, April 30, p. 156-160 : Edi- torial observations, no. 491, June 4, p. 211, 212. A bill for amending the law relating to copyright, so far as regards the delivery of periodical publications at the British museum. (Prepared and brought in by mr, Ayr- ton and mr. chancellor of the exchequer. Ordered, by the H, of C, to be printed, 22 April 1869. 2 p. i 1. Par. pap. V. 2: Bills V. 2. Sess. 10 Dec. 1868-11 Aug. 1869, "°* 93- .... A bill to amend the law relatmg to mternational copy- right. (Prepared and brought in by mr. Bourke and sir C. Adderley.) Ordered, by the H. of C, to be printed, 8 July 1874. 2 p. 1 1, Par. pap. v.z: Bills v. 2. Sess. 5 March-^ Aug. 1874, no. 197, A bill intituled an act to give effect to an act of the Parliament of the Dominion of Canada respecting copyright, (Brought from the lords, 8 July 1875.) Ordered, by the H. of C, to be printed, 9 July 1S75. 10 p. Par. pap. v. i ; Bills v. i, Sess. 5 Feb.-i3 Aug. 1875, no. 246. A bill to amend the law relating to international copy- right. Par. pap. v. 3 : Bills v. 3. Sess. 5 Feb.-ig Aug. 1875, no 56. A bill to consolidate and amend the law relating to copyright. (Prepared and brought in by lord John Manners, viscount Sandon, and mr. attorney general:) Ordered, by the H. of C, to be printed, 29 July 1879. iv, 34 p. 1 1. Par. pap. v. 2 : Bills v, 2. Sess. 5 Dec. 1878- 15 Aug. 1879, no. 265, — Review in " The Athenseum," 1880, 4". London, I, — no, 2723, Jan. 3, p. 25, 26. IL — no. 2725, Jan. 17, p. 94, 95. III. — no. 2728, Feb. 7, p. 1S9, 190- IV. — no 2730, Feb. 21, p. 255, ^^f>.^Notice in " The Journal of the Society of Arts, ' v. 27. 8°. London, no. X396, Aug. 22, 1879, p. 879, 880. Convention between her majesty and the free Hanseatic city of Hamburg, for the establishment of international copyright. Signed at Hamburg, Aug. 16, 1853, 12 p. Par. pap. v. 72 : Accounts and papers v, 34, Sess. 31 Jan. 12 Aug. 1854, no. 37 or 1700. Convention between her majesty and the French re- publiCf for the establishment of international copyright. Signed at Paris, Nov. 3, 1851. 12 p. i 1. Par, pap. v. 54 : Ac. and pap. v. 27. Sess. 3 Feb.-i July 1852, no. 34 or 1432. Convention between her majesty and the king of Hanover, for the establishment of international copyright. Signed at London, Aug. 4, 1847. 10 p. Par, pap. v. 65 : Ac. and pap. v, 37. Sess. 18 Nov. 1847-5 Sept. 1848, no. 200 or 88g. — Accession of the grand duke of Oldenburg to the convention concluded Aug, 4, 1847, between Great Britain and Hanover, for the establishment of inter- national copyright. Signed at Hanover, Dec. 28, 1847. 6 p. 1 1. Par. pap. v. 65 : Ac. and pap. v. 27. Sess. 18 Nov. 1847-5 Sept. 1848, no. 51 or 898. Convention between her majesty and the king of Prussia, for the establishment of international copyright. Signed at Berlin, May 13, 1846. 10 p. Par. pap. v. 52 : Ac. and pap. v. 28. Sess. 22 Jan.-28 Aug. 1846, no 93 or 715. — Accession of the duke of Anhalt to the convention concluded 13 May 1846, between Great Britain and Prussia,' for the establishment of international copyright. Signed at Berlin, 8 Feb. 1853. Par. pap. v. loz : Ac. and pap. v, 46. Sess, 4 Nov. 1852-20 Aug. 1853, no. 1598. — Accession of the duke of Brunswick, to the convention concluded May 13, 1846, between Great Britain and Prussia. Signed at Berlin, March 30, 1847. 6 p. i 1. Par. pap. v. 70: Ac. and pap. v. 37. Sess. 19 Jan.-23 July 1847, no. 140 or 804. — Accession of the grand duke of Hesse to the conventions concluded May 13, 1846, and June 14, 1855, between Great Britain and Prussia. Signed at Berlin, Nov. 19, 1861. i p, I. 4 p. Par. pap, v. 63 : Ac, and pap. v. 35. Sess. 6 Feb.-? Aug. 1862, no, 39_ or 2908, — Accession of the king of Saxony to the convention concluded May 13, 1846, between Great Britain and Prussia. Signed at Berlin, Aug. 24, 1846, 6 p. x 1. Far. pap. v. 70: Ac. and pap. v. 37, Sess. 19 Jan. -23 July 1847, no. 17 or 770. —Accession of the states forming the Thuringian union, to the convention concluded^ May 13, 1846, between Great Britain and Prussia, Signed at Berlin, July i, 1847. 8 p. Par. pap, v. 70 : Ac. and pap. v. 37. Sess. iQ Jan.-23 July 1847, no. 193 or 849. Convehtion between her majesty and the king of Prus- sia, additional to the convention concluded at Berlin, May 13, 1846, for the establishment of international copy- right. Signed at London, June 14, 1855. S p. Par. pap. v. 61 : Ac. and pap. v. 24. Sess. 31 Jan.-zg July 1856, no. 248 or 2013. Convention between her majesty and the king of Sar- dinia, for the establishment of international copyright. Signed at Turin, Nov. 30, i860, i p. 1. 8 p. Par. pap, v. 67 : Ac. and pap. v, 34. Sess. 5 Feb,-6 Aug. 1861, no. 47 or 2758. _ Convention between her majesty and the king of the Belgians, for the establishment of international copyright. Signed at London, Aug. 12, 1854. 1. p. 1. 10 p. i 1. Par. pap. v. 55 ; Ac. and pap. v. 26. Sess. 12 Dec. 1854-14 Aug. 185s, no. 42 or 1872. Convention between her majesty and the queen of Spain, for the establishment of international copyright. Signed at Madrid, July 7, 1857. i p. 1. 8 p. z 1. Par. pap. V. 60 : Ac. and pap. v. 28. Sess. 3 Dec. 1857-2 Aug. 1858, no. 260 or 2300. Copies of or extracts from correspondence between the colonial office and any of the colonial governments on the subject of copyright • and of colonial acts relating to copyright which have been allowed by her majesty. (Mr. Edward Jenkins.) Ordered, by the H. of C, to be printed, 13 April 1875. 30 p, I 1. Par. pap. v. 51 : Ac. and pap. V. 10. _ Sess. s Feb. -13 Aug. 1875, no. 144. Copies of two orders of her majesty in council, of loth Jan. 1852, issued in furtherance of the copyright treaty with France. Ordered, by the H. of C, to be printed, 18 Feb. 1852. 4 p. Par, pap. v. 51 : Ac. and pap. v. 24. Sess. 3 Feb. -I July 1852, no. 81. Copies or extracts of correspondence between the co- lonial office, the board of trade^ and the government of Canada, which preceded the passing of the act 10 & 11 Vict, c. 95 ; and, of any recent correspondence on the subject of that act and of proposals for amending or extending the same. (Sir Charles Adderley.) Ordered, by the H. of C., to be printed, 29 July 1872. viii, 80 p. Par, pap. v. 43 ; Ac. and pap. v. 8. Sess. 6 Feb.-io Aug. 1872, no. 339. Copy of treasury minute, dated 17th July 1832 ; respect- ing the purchase of the rights of the University of Aber- deen fto certain copies of books. Ordered, by the H. of C, to be printed, 28 July 1832. 2 p. Par, pap. v. 26. Sess. 6 Dec, 1831-16 Aug. 1832, no. 656, Copya-ight commission. The royal commissions and the report of the commissioners, xc p. Par. pap. v. 24 : Re- ports from' commissioners v. 6. Sess. 17 Jan.-i6 Aug. 1878, no, C.-2036. Contents: The commissions, p. iii-vi. Report: Home copyright, p. vii-xxx : Colonial copyright, p. xxx-xxxvi : International copyright, p. xxxvi-xliv : Dissent etc. p. xlv-lx. Digest of the law of copyright. By sir James Stephen, p. Ixi.-xc. Notice by Moy Thomas in " The Academy," 4". Lon- don, 1878. I.-v. 13, no. 321, June 29, p. 578, 579 : II.-v. 14, no- 333».July 13, p. 36-38: III.— v, 14, no. 324, July 20, Pi'rS^~^3* Anon, review [by James Anthony Froude] in The Edinburgh review." v, 148. 8". Edinburgh, no. 304, Oct. 1878, p. 295-343. Notice in "The Nation." v. 2j. 4". New York, no. 680, July 11, 1878, p. 24, 25. Review in "The Popular science monthly," v, 13, 8", LITERARY PROPERTY. 17 New York, no. 77, Sept. 1878, Editor's table, p. 618-620. Anon, review i« " The Saturday review." v. 45, fol. London, no. X1S3, June 29, 1878, p. 819, 820. Anon no- tice in " The Spectator." 4". London, June 22^ 1878, p. 789, 790. See also Carmichael (C: H: E:) Correbpondence between the foreign office and her maj- esty's representatives abroad, and foreign representatives in England, on the subject of copyright : 1872-75. 1 p. 1. 38 p. z 1. Par. pap. v. 78 : Ac. ana pap. v. 37. Sess. 5 Feb.-i3 Aug. 1875, no. 0.-1285. Correspondence respecting colonial copyright, i p. 1. 30 p. Par. pap. v. 44 : Ac. and pap. v. 10. Sess. s March- 7 Aug. 187^ no, C.-1067. Declaration cancelling section 3 of article IV. of the copyright convention between Great Britain and France of Nov. 3, 1851. Signed at London, Aug. 11, 1875. 2 1. Par. pap. v. 82: Ac. and pap. v. 41. Sess. 5 Feb. -13 Aug. 1875, no. C.-1358. Extracts of so much of the returns made by the univer- sities of Oxford and Cambridge, (pursuant to the orders of the ist July 1817 and 20th Feb, last) as state, whether any of the books claimed under the late copyright act have been omitted to be placed in their respective li- braries, and how otherwise disposed of. Ordered, by the H. of C., to be printed, 6 Marcn 1818. 6 p. i 1. Par. pap. V. 15: Ac. and pap. Sess. 27 Jan.-io June, 1818, no. 98. Minutes of evidence taken before the committee on acts of 8 Anne, and 15 & 41 Geo. lU. for the encouragement of learning, by vesting the copies of printed books, in the authors or purchasers of such copies. Ordered, by the H. of C., to be printed, 20 July 1813. 33 p. i 1. Par. pap. V. 4 : Rep. from com. v. 2. Sess. 24 N0V.-22 July 1812- 1813, no. 341. — Same. Ordered, by the H. of C, to be reprinted, 13 April 1818. i p. I. 33 p. Par. pap. v„ g : Rep. from com. Sess. 27 Jan.-io June 1818, no 177. Minutes of evidence taken before the select committee on the copyright acts of 8 Anne, c. 19 ; 15 Geo. III. c, 53 ; 41 Geo. III. c. 107 ; and 54 Geo. III. c. 116. Ordered, by the H. of C., to be printed, 8 May 1818. 132 p. Par. pap. V. g : Rep. from com. Sess. 27 Jan.-io June 1818, no. 280. Minutes of the evidence taken before the royal commis- sion on copyright together with an appendix, v, 409 p. Par. pap. v. 24 : Rep. from com. v. 6. Sess. 17 Jan.-i6 Aug. 1878, no. 0.-2036,-1. Report from committee on acts of 8 Anne, and 15 & 41 Geo. III. for the encouragement of learning, by vesting the copies of printed books, in the authors or purchasers of such copies. Ordered, by the H. of C., to be printed, 17 June 1813. 2 p. I 1. Par, pap. v. 4 : Rep. from com. V 2. Sess. 24 N0V.-22 July, i8i2-i8t3, no. 292. Report from the select committee on dramatic liter- ature : with the minutes of evidence. Ordered, by the H. of C, to be printed, 2 Aug. 1832. 250 p. i fol'd chart. Par. pap. v. 7 : Rep. from com. v. 3. Sess. 6 Dec. 1831- 16 Aug. 1832, no. bji^.— Notice in " The Legal observer." V. 5. 8". London, no. 107, Nov. 3, 1832, p. 6, 7. Report from the select committee on the copyright acts of 8 Anne, c. 19; 15 Geo. III. c. 53 ; 41 Geo. III. c. 107 ; and 54 Geo. III. c. 116. Ordered, by the H. of C, to be printed, 5 June 1818. 8 p. Par. pap. v. 9: Rep. from com. Sess. 27 Jan. -10 June 1818, no. 402. Report from the select committee on the copyright bill; together with the proceedings of the committee, and min- utes of evidence. Ordered, by the H. of C, to be printed, 29 June 1864. 10 p. T 1. Par pap. v. 9 : Rep. from com. v. 5. Sess. 4 Feb.-2g July 1864, no. 441. Return of literary works and books of prints entered at Stationers' Hall, 1709-1826. Ordered, by the H. of C, to be printed, 9 May 1827. Par. pap. v. 20: Ac. and pap. V. 4. Sess. 21 Nov. 1826-2 July 1827, no. 322, Return of the amount of wholesale prices of one copy of each book entered at Stationers* Hall during the years 1833, 1834 and 1835. (Mr. Arthur Trevor.) Ordered, by the H. of C, to be printed, 22 June 1836. 2 p. Par. pap. V. 47 : Ac. and pap. v. 11. Sess. 4 Feb.-2o Aug. 1836, no- 357. Return of the colonies and British possessions in fa- vour of which orders in council have been issued under the act 10 & II Vict. c. 95, suspending the prohibition of importation of reprints of British copyright works ; also, of the nature and terms of the provision made for securing or protecting the rights of British authors in such colo- nies, &c. (Mr. Headlam.) Ordered, by the H. of C, to be printed, 25 Aug. 1857. 4 p. Par. pap. v. 28 : Ac. and pap. V. 4. Sess, 30 April-28 Aug. 1857, no, 30^. A return of the manner in which the books received under the copyright act, 54 Gei. 3, c. 156, and stated by a return made to an order of this house, dated 20th Feb. 1818, as not placed in the public library of the University of Cambridge, — have been disposed of. Ordered, by the H. of C., to be printed, 9 April 1818. 4 p. i 1, Par. pap. V. 15: Ac. and pap. Sess, 27 Jan.-io June, 1818, no. 168. Return of the number of volumes received from Sta- tioners' Hall by the British Museum, under the late copy- right act; from the ist of Jan, to the 31st of Dec. 1817. Ordered, by the H. of C, to be printed, 3 March 1818. 2 p. Par. pap. v. 15 : Ac. and pap. Sess. 27 Jan.-io June, 1818, no. 81. Return relating to the registration of works of literature, &c. (Mr. Black.) Ordered, by the H. of C, to be printed, 16 March 1864, 2 p. Par. pap. v. 50 : Ac. and pap. V. 19. Sess. 4 Feb.-2g July 1864, no. 129, Griesinger (Ludwig Friedrich). Der biicher- nachdruck, aus dem gesichtspunkte des rechts, der moral und politik betrachtet. 88 p. 16°. Stuttgart, A. F. Macklot, 1822. See also Schmid (Karl Ernst). GuAY (Marcel). De la propri6t6 intellectuelle, l^tudes de legislation compar6e. fitats-Unis. Dispositions de I'acte du 8 juillet 1870 rela- tives aux droits de copie. 13 p. 1 1. 8° Paris, E. Duchemin, 1877. De ia propri6t6 littferaire, dramatique at artistique dans les divers 6tats de rAm6rique latino, fitudes de legislation compar^e. i'*. Mexique. About 20 p. 8°. Paris, E. Duche- min, 1876. De la propriety littferaire, ou explication de la loi frangaise des 14-19 juillet 1866 sur les droits des h6ritiers et des ayants cause des auteurs. About 61 p. 8°. Paris, E. Duchemin, 1876. De la repression de la contrefa9on en matifere de propriety litt6raire, d'aprfes la science rationnelle et les legislations posi- tives. About 59 p. 8*'. Paris, E. Dentu, 1877. GuiDA pratica degli ufEcj comunali per la tutela dei diritti d'autore sulle rappresenta- zioni teatrali. [Anon.] 72 p, 8°, Milano, N. Battezzati, 1870. GuiFFREY (Georges). De I'unite k introduire dans la legislation internationale de la pro- priete litteraire et artistique. About 12 p. 8°. Paris, Guiraudet, 1855. De la propriete intellectuelle au point de vue du droit et de I'histoire. About 68 p. 8**. Paris, Beauie, 1862 (?) La propriete litteraire au i8e sifecle. i860. Se£ Association pour la defense de la pro- priete litteraire. S^e also Diderot (Denis). GuiLLOT (Adolphe). Examen du projet de loi sur la propriete litteraire. 8°, Paris, Jousset, 1863, H. (J. L,) See Drone (Eaton Sylvester). H. (R.) Further reasons addressed to parlia- ment [etc.] 1737. See Carte (T:) Habberton (J:) See The Publishers' weekly. Hale (E: Everett). See The Publishers' weekly. Halliwell-Phillips (James Orchard). Obser- vations on some of the manuscript emenda- tions of the text of Shakespeare, and are they copyright? 16 p. 8°. London, J, R. Smith, 1853. LITERARY PROPERTY. Hammond (W: A.)' See The Publishers' weekly. Handy-book (A) on the law of the drama and music : being an exposition of the law of dramatic copyright, copyright in musical com- positions, dramatic copyright in music, and international copyright in the drama and music. \Anon.'\ viii, 79 p. 16°. London, T. H. Lacy, 1864. Hargrave (Francis). An argument in defence of literary property. 2 p.l. 52 p. 12°. London, printed for the author, [1774]. Anon, review in "The Monthly review." v. 51. 8'. London, Sept. 1774, p. 209-213. Harper & Brothers. [Memorandums in regard to international copyright between the United States and Great Britain.] 16 p. 8°. [New York, 1879.] Contents: I. A suggestion to the Department of State, p. 3, 4. II.-III. Convention proposed in 1870 by- lord Clarendon, p. 5-11. IV. Bill proposed by W: H. Appleton, p. 12. V. Extracts from W: H. Appleton's letter to the " London Times," p. 12, 13. VL Extracts from G: Haven Putnam's address on international copy- right, p. 14-16. Same. In "The Publishers' weekly." v. 15. 8°. New York, no. 374, March 15, 1879, p. 317-324. Same : [Second issue.] 55 p. 8° [New York, 1880.] Contents ; Memorandums, p. 3-16. International copyright. Papers relating thereto in Macmillan's mag- azine [by S. S. Conant and " C," i.e. Leonard H; Courtney], With rejoinder [by S. S. Conant], p. 17-40. Copyright by Matthew Arnold, p. 41-55. Notice by Moy Thomas in " The Academy." v. 15. 4*. London, no. 36T, n. s., April 5, 1879, P- 303i 304- Anon, notice in "The Athenaeum." 4*. London, no. 2684, April 5. 1879, P* 439* Notice in " The Popular science monthly.'' v. 15. 8*. New York, no. 86, June 1879, Editor's table, p. 265-268. See also Messrs. Harper and the interna- tional copyright question. [Letter in reply to Moy Thomas, by W. J. Sillman, and re- joinder by Moy Thomas.] In "The Acad- emy." V. 15. 4°. London, no. 364, n. s., April 26, 1879, p. 371. Harper's new monthly magazine. 8°. New York. Contains; v. 46, 1873. International _ copyright. [Anon.}^ p. 906-911. — V. 58, 1879. tluternational copy- right.^ Editor's easy chair, p. 929-931. — v, 61, 1880. [Wiikie Collins on copyright.] Editor's easy chair, p. 469, 470. — V. 62, 1881. [International copyright with Great Britain.] Editor's easy chair, p. 946, 947. Harum (Peter). Die gegenwSrtige osterreich- ische pressgesetzgebung. Systematische dar- stellung uiid eriauterung der gesetzlichen bestimmungen ttber das autorrecht und der presspolizeigesetzgebung mit einer einleiten- den abhandlung liber das autorrecht im allge- meinen. About x, 350 p. 8° Wien, Manz, 1857- ' Die pressordnung vom 27. Mai 1852 nebst jenen bestimmungen des neuen allgemeinen strafgesetzes, welche auf druckschriften an- wendung finden und den sonstigen noch in kraft bestehenden darauf bezuglichen verord- nungen, insbesondere dem allerhiJchste pat- ente zum schutze des geistigen eigenthumes vom 19. October :846. About vi, 77 p. 8°. Pesth, Geibel, 1852. Hastings (G; Woodyatt). On copyright and trade marks. Cantor lecture, Monday, Jan. 15, 1866. In "The Journal of the Society of Arts." V. 14. 8°. London, no. 687, Jan. 19, 1866, p. 135-137- Hauman ( A.) De la rfeimpression en Belgique. 31 p. 8°. Bruxelles, Meline, Cans & comp., 1851. Hawks (Francis L.) 5«i? American copyright club. Hay (J:) See The Publishers' weekly. Headley (J: Tyler). See The Publishers' weekly. Hedde (Philippe). Propri6t6 littferaire, initia- tive, prioritfe, plagiat [etc J About 16 p. 8°. Paris, Baillifere, 1851. Helps (Sir Arthur). International copyright be- tween Great Britain and America : a letter to Charles Eliot Norton, Esq. [^non. Signed A British author.] In " Macmillan's magazine. ' V. 20. 8°. London, no. 116, June 1869, p. 89- 95. Same. In " Every Saturday." v. 7. 8°. Boston, no. 180, June 12, 1869, p. 742-745. Hen (Charles). La rfiimpression. fitude sur cette question considfer^e principalement au point de vue des int6rets beiges et franjais. [Anon.] 116 p. 12°. Bruxelles, A. Decq, 1851. Henley (Robert Henlej', 2d baron Henley). A treatise on the law of injunctions. 8°. Lon- don, for J. Butterworlh & son, 1821. Contains: Injunctions to restrain the infringement of copyright, p. 264-289. Also in the same : 1st Am. ed. 8°. Albany, W. Gould £ CO., 1822, p. 190-208. Also in the same : With notes by T: W. Waterman. 3d ed. 2 V. 8°. New York, Banks, Gould & CO., 1852. X13 p. in V. 2. Herculano de Carvalho e Araujo (Alex- andre). Da propriedade litteraria e da recente conven9ao com Franca. Carta ao sr. viscon- de de Almeida Garrett. About 34 p. 8°. Lis- boa, na imp. nacional, 1851. H£reau (Edme Joachim). Propri6t6 littferaire. Droits d'auteurs en Russie. In " Revue encyclopfedique." v. 34. 12°. Paris, mai 1827, p. 533-537- HiROi.D (Ferdinand). Sur la perp6tuit6 de la propri^tfe littferaire. Extrait de la Revue pra- tique de droit frangais du ler mai 1862. 46 p. 8°. Paris, A. Marescq, 1862. Hertslet (Lewis) and Hertslet (E:) A com- plete collection of the treaties and conventions subsisting between Great Britain & foreign powers. V. 1-12. 8". London, H. Butterworth, 1827-71. Note. — Contains copyright conventions, acts of parlia- ment and orders in council relating to cop. The index to the series, in v. 12, contains 150 references under " Copy- right. Hetzel (Pierre Jules). Deux lettres publifies en mai 1862 [?], dans le Journal des d6bats, contre I'assimilation de la propri6t6 littferaire avec la propri6t6 du droit commun, et pour LITERARY PROPERTY. 19 la creation du domaine public payant. About 36 p. 12°. Paris, Hetzel, 1878. Hetzel (Pierre Jules). La propri6t6 littferaire et la domaine public payant. 8°. Bruxelles, Van Buggenhout, i860. Sonne. About 32 p. 8°. Paris, E. Dentu, 1862 [?]. See also Paillottet (Prosper). Examen du systferae de m. Hetzel sur la proprifetfe litt6- raire. Heydemann (Ludwig Eduard). Sammlung der gutachten des Koniglich-preussischen liter- arischen sachverstandigen-Vereins heraus- gegeben von L. E. Heydemann. Nebst einem vorworte liber die praxis des vereins und einem anhange von gesetzen und re- scripten. About xlvi, 310 p. 8°. Berlin, T. C. F. Enslin, 1848. and Dambach (Otto). Die preussische nachdrucks-gesetzgebung erlautert durch die praxis des koniglichen litterarischen Sacli- verstandigen-vereins. About xxviii, 632 p. 8°. Berlin, T. C. F. Enslin, 1863. \i.e., 1862.] HiGGiNSON (T: Wentworth). See The Publish- ers' weekly. High (James Lambert). A treatise on the law of injunctions. 8°. Chicago, Callaghan & CO., 1873. Contains: Injunctions against the infringement of copjrrights, p. 361-385. A Cso in the same ; 2d ed. 2 v . 8°. Chicago, Callaghan & CO., 1880, V. 2, p. 622-687. See also Drone (Eaton Sylvester). HiLLERN (Hermann von). Streitfragen aus dem autorrecht mit bezug auf zwei entscheidun- gen des reichsoberhandelsgerichts. 8i p. 8°. Freiburg i. Br., F. Wagner, 1876. HiLLiARD (Francis). The law of injunctions. 8°. Philadelphia, Kay & Brother, 1865. Contains: Copyrights, p. 390-398. Also in the same : 2d ed. 8°. Philadelphia, Kay & Brother, 1869, p. 469-480. Also in the same: 3d ed. 8**. Philadelphia, Kay & Brother, 1874, p. 524-539. HiNTON (J :) vs Donaldson (Alexander), et al. See Boswell (James). History (The) of international copyright in Congress. 1866. See Spofford (Ainsworth Rand). HiTZiG (Julius Eduard). Das konigl. preus- sische gesetz vom 11. Juni 1837 zum schutze des eigenthums an werken der wissenschaft und kunstgegen nachdruck und nachbildung. Dargestellt und erlautert durch J. E. Hitzig. viii, 122 p. I 1, 8°. Berlin, F. Diimmler, 1838, Hoffmann (— ). De la propri6t6 littferaire sous le point de vue international. In " Revue de legislation et de jurisprudence." v. 14. 8° Paris, 1841, p. iyii-seq. Ueber das urheberrecht an briefen. Inau- gural dissertation. 12°. St. Gallen, 1874. Hoffmanns ( — de). De la propri6t6 littfe- raire, sous le point de vue international. In " Revue de bibliographie analytique." v. 2. 8°. Paris, 1841, mai, p. 467-480. Same. About 16 p. 8°. Paris, Mme. Don- dey-Duprfe, 1841. Holland (Josiah Gilbert). See The Pub- lishers' weekly. See also Scribner's monthly. Holmes (Oliver Wendell). See The Publish- ers' weekly. HOlzl (Joseph). Abhandlung iiber den biicher- nachdruck und die sicherung schriftstel- lerischer rechte. 2 p. 1. 48 p. 8°. Wien, L. Grund, 1840. Hood (T:) Copyright and copy wrong. Let- ters L-HI. In " The Athenseum." 1837. 4°- London, no. 494, April 15, p. 263-265. no. 495, April 22, p. 285-287. no. 496, April 29, P 304-306. Same : Letters IV.-V. In " The Athen^- um." 1842. 4°. London, no. 763, June 11, p. 524-526. no. 764, June 18, p. 544, 545. Same : Letters L-V. In Prose and verse by T: Hood. Part 2. 12°. New York, Wiley & Putnam, 1845, p. 73-122. Same: Letters I.-V. /» The Works of T: Hood. Edited by his son. 12°. London, E. Moxon & CO., 1862. V. 4, p. 185-221. v. 6, p. 91-114. Petition. In The Works of T: Hood. V. 5. 12°. London, E. Moxon & co., 1862, p. 365-367- Same. In "The Monthly magazine : edited by J: A. Heraud." V. 3. 8°. London, no. 15, March 1840, p. 326, 327. Same. In " The Publishers' weekly.'' v. 19, 8°. New York, no. 468, Jan. i, 1881, p. 18, 19. See also Lowndes (J: James). — Talfourd (Sir T: Noon). Hooper (H:) See Fisher (Robert Alexander). A digest of cases relating to patents and copyrights. HOpfner (Ludwig). Der nachdruck ist nicht rechtswidrig. Eine wissenschaftliche eror- terung, begleitet von einigen bemerkungen zu dem beigefiigten, den versammelten stan- den des konigreichs Sachsen am 21. Novbr. 1842 vorgelegten gesetzentwurfe, den schutz der rechte an literarischen erzeugnissen und werken der kunst betrefFend. 2 p. I. 94 p. 8°. Grimma, verlagscomptoir, 1843. Hotten (J: Camden). Literary copyright. Seven letters addressed by permission to the right hon. the earl Stanhope. 2 p. 1. vii-155 p. 12°. London, J. C. Hotten, 1871. Anon, review in "The Athenaeum." 4'. London, no. 2299, Nov, iS, 1871, p. 649. Howe (U. Tracy). International copyright. In " Western law journal." v. 2. 8°. Cincinnati, no. 8, May 1845, p. 347-352. Note. — " I shall endeavor to maintain that we ought to establish an international copyright for three reasons ; i;. In justice to authors ; 2, .Because it would afford some 30 LITERARY PROPERTY. protection against the indiscriminate introduction of for- eign literature ; 3. Because it would aid us to build up a sound, healthy national literature/' p. 347. HowELLS (W: Dean). See The Publishers' weekly. HuARD (Adrien). Dialogue des morts sur la propri^tfe littdraire. 1862. See Beaume (Alex- andre) and Huaid. fitude comparative des legislations fran- jaise et 6trang6res en matifere da propri6t6 industrielle, artistique et littferaire. 242 p. 12°. Paris, Cosse & Marchal, 1863. See also Pelletier (Michel) and Defert (Henry). Hugo (Victor Marie, comte). Discours d'ouver- ture du Congris litt^raire international. [Stance publique du 17 juin.] Le domaine public payant. [S6ance du 21 juin et sfeance du 25 juin.] 30 p. I 1. 8°, Paris, C, L6vy, 1878. HuGUET (Auguste). See Annales de la pro- priet6 industrielle, artistique et littferaire. See also Collet (Emile) and Le Senne (C.) HuiSH (Marcus B.) The year's art. A concise epitome of all matters relating to the arts of painting, sculpture, and architecture. 1880. 12°. London, Macmillan & co., 1880. Contains: The copyright commission, p. i35-rS3. Same: 1881. 12°. London, Macmillan & CO., 1881. Contains: Copyright, p. 177-182. Hunt (W: Holman). Artistic copyright. In "The Nineteenth century." v. 5.8° Lon- don, no. 25, March 1879, p. 418-424. Huntington (Jedediah Vincent). Dr. Hun- tington on copyright. [Letter to " The Morn- ng chronicle," New York, July 26, 1851.] In "The International magazine." v. 4. 8°. New York, no. 3, Oct. i, 1851, p. 303-306. Huxley (T: H:) Professor Huxley before the English copyright commission. [Ques- tions and answers.] In " The Popular science monthly." v. 14. 8°. New York, no, 80, Dec. 1878, p. 166-182. Inquiry into the copyright act. 1819. See Sou- they (Robert). International copy-right. {Anon.} In " The American law journal." v. 8, n. s. v. i. 8°. Philadelphia, Aug. 1848, p. 49-62. In iEKNATlONAL copyright. [Anon.] In "The American law register." v. 2. 8°. Philadel- phia, No. 3, Jan. 1854, p. 129-144. International copyright. [Anon.] In' 8°". New York The no. Knickerbocker." v. 22. 4, Oct. 1843, p. 360-364. International copyright. [Anon.] In " The New-Yorker." v. 8. 4°. New York, H. Gree- ley & CO., no. 4. Oct. 1839, P- 49> 5°- International copyright. [Anon.] In " Put- nam's magazine." v. 9. 8°. New York, no. 49, Jan. 1857, p. 85-91. International copyright association. See Copyright (The) association for the protection and advancement of literature and art. International copyright between Great Britain and America. 1869. S?« Helps (Sir Arthur). International copyright. — Injustice to au- thors. [Anon.] In "The Democratic age." V. I. 8°. New York, 1859, P- 34-39- International (The) copyright question. [Anon.] In " The United States magazine and democratic review." N. s. v. 12. 8°. New York, no. 56, Feb. 1843, p. 115-122. International copyright. — The claims of lit- erature. [Anon.] In " United States demo- cratic review." N. s. v. 42. 8°. New York, no. 6, Dec. 1858, p. 454-464. International copyright with Great Britain. See Carter (Timothy Harrington). Is an abridgment an infringement of the copy- right of the original work ? [Anon.'] In " The American law register." v. 3. 8°. Philadel- phia, Jan. 1855, p. 129-136. Is copyright perpetual ? 1875. See Drone (Eaton Sylvester). 1st der nachdruck schon nach gemeinen deutschen positiven rechten fiir unerlaubt zu halten ? [Anon.] 8°. Halle, Curt, 1796. Italy. Ministero di agricoltura, industria e commercio. (Direzione delP industria e del com- mercio). Annali dell' industria e del commer- cio 18S1. Num.33. Legislazione sulla pro- prieta letteraria ed artistica. Convenzione tra ritalia e la Spagna : legge e regolamenti vigenti in Spagna sulla proprieti inlellettu- ale. 52 p. 8°. Roma, E. Botta, 1881. See also Annuaire de legislation 6trang6re, 1875. Jacob (Ephraim A.) An analytical digest of thje law and practice of the courts of England, comprising the reported cases from 1756 to 1878, founded on the digests of Harrison and Fisher, v. 2. 8°. New- York, G; S. Diossy, 1879. . Contains : Copyright, col. 2376-2432. Jacob (Giles). The law-dictionary. Enlarged by T: E. Tomlins. ist Am. from 2d London ed. 6 v. 8° New-York, I. Riley, 1811. Contains : Literary property, v. 4, p. 183-189. Note. — The same article with additions in The law- dictionary. By sir T : Edlyne Tomlins, 4th ed. by T : C. Granger. 4°. Loudon, for J. & W. T. Clarke etc., "835, 7 cols, in V. 2. Jefferys vs. Boosey. House of lords. Aug. I, 1854. Reported by James Paterson. In " The Law times :" Reports, v. 23. fol. Lon- don, 1854, p. 275-282. Same. In Leverson (Montague R:) Copy- right. 8°. London, Wildy & sons, 1854. Appendix, p. i-lxii. Same. Editorial remarks. In " The Ju- rist." v. 18, part 2, 1854. 8°. London, no. 919, p. 285, 286, no. 920, p. 293, 294. Jerrold (Sidney). A handbook of English and foreign copyright in literary and dramat- ic works, being a concise digest of the laws regulating copyright in some of the chief countries of the world, together with an an- LITERARY PROPERTY. 21 alysis of the chief copyright conventions ex- isting between Great Britain and foreign countries, xiv p. i 1. 112 p. 12°. London, Chatto & Windus, 1881. .<4«fl«. Mo^iV^ /« " The Athenaeom." 4°. London, no. 2818, Oct. 29, 1881, p. 558, 559. JoBARD (Jean Baptiste Ambroise Marcellin). Nouvelle 6conoinie sociale, ou monautopole industriel, artistique, commercial et litt^raire. xii, 5-475+4 duplicate p. 8°. Paris, Mathias : Bruxelles, chez I'auteur, 1844. Contains: Propri^t6 littSraire, p. 172-175. Question des limites de la propri^te intellectuelle, [With letter from J. Meeus Vandermaelen], p. 268-277. Uii pas vers la propri^t6 intellectuelle en Angleterre, p. 333-341. Organon de la proprifetfe intellectuelle. 353 p. 12°. Paris, Mathias, 1851. Review by Gustave de Molinari in "Journal des ccon- omistes." V. 30. 1851. 8". Paris, p. 176, 177. Jolly (Julius). Die lehre vom nachdruck. Nach den beschlussen des deutschen bundes dargestellt. vi, 314 p. 8°. Heidelberg, J. C. B. Mohr, 1852. [Archiv fiir die civilistische praxis. Beilageheft. 35. band]. JONA (Giovanni). Alcune parole sulla pro- prieta letteraria. About 46 p. 8°. Padova, coi tipi della Minerva, 1841. Same. Delia proprieta letteraria, discorso pronunciato nel giorno della sua promozione alia laurea legale da Giovanni Jona . di Gorizia. About 48 p. 8°, Padova, coi tipi della Minerva, 1841. Jones (T. E.) See Britton (J:) The rights of literature. JORDAO Paiva Manso (Levy Maria). A proprie- dade litteraria nao existia entre os romanos. 15 p. In Academia real das sciencias de Lisboa. Historia e memorias. Nova serie, V. 2, part 2. 4°. Lisboa, 1863. Same. De la propri6t6 littferaire chez les Romains. Traduit du portugais par L. Bon- neville de Marsangy. /»" Revue critique de legislation et de jurisprudence." v. so. 8°. Paris, 1862, p. 441-457. Same. 8°. Paris, Cotillon, 1862. Journal (The) of the Society of arts. v. 1-29. 1852-1881. Sm. 4°. London, 1853-81. Contains : v. 6. Cop. in fine arts. [Committee appoint- ed], p. 91, [Circular signed by the secretary of the com- mittee, P. Le Neve Foster], p. 103. Art cop. [Notice of report by D. R. Blaine], p. 167. Report of the art. cop. com., p. 293-296. Mr. Blaine's report to the com. on art. cop., p. 296-301. [Circulars], p. 302. Art. cop. [Petition to the House of Lords], p. 455, 456. Literary and art. cop. [Congress at Brussels], p. 578, 579. [Resolutions of the congress], p. 707, 708.*— v. 10. Art. cop. [Address by sir T: Phillips], p. 12, 13. Literary and art. cop. in France, p. 164. Art. cop. [Efforts to amend the law], p. 511. Art. cop. An act for amending the law relating to cop. in works of the fine arts, 29th July, 1862, p. 592-594. — V. Z2. [Art. cop. com. and Mr. Black's bill], p. 364. Cop. in engravings ; cop. bill in House of Commons, p. 577. Cop. act of engravings : case of infringement, p. 631.' — v. 14. On copyright and trade marks. By G: W. Hastings, p. 135- 137. Cop. in works of art ; [Report of the councilj, p. 544. Law of cop. in France, p. 560. A case of cop. [Litho- graph from engraving of a picture by Pils], p. 019. Law of cop. [with America], p. 695. — v. 17. Case of art. prop- erty. [Photograph], p. 147. Cop. convention between France and Belgium, p. 399. Cop. in works of fine art : [A bill for consolidating and amending the law of cop. in works of fine art. Speeches in the House of Lords, 30th April 1869 by lord Westbury, earl Stanhope, and the earl of Kimberley], p. 469-472. — v. iS. Cop. in newspaper ar- ticles, p. 124. — v. ig. Int. cop., p. 28. — V. 20. Cop. associa- tion, p. 358, 359. — V. 27. Cop. [Lord J: Manner's bill], p. 879, 880, — V. 29. Cop. [Com. of the Social Science associa- tion] p. 418, 419. Cop, [Law amendment society bill], p. 6s4. Joyce (W:) The doctrines and principles of the law of injunctions. 8°. London, Stevens & Haynes, 1877. Contains: Copyright, p. 153-163. The law and practice of injunctions in equity and at common law. 2 v. 8°. London, Stevens & Haynes, 1872. Contains : Copyright, v. r, p. 270-311. Also in the same. v. I, 8", (.incinnati, R. Clarke A CO., 1872, p. 270-308. JUDEiCH (Edm.) Vortrag Uber das recht der schriftsteller und kilnstler an ihren werken. Gehalten am 13. Marz 1867 zu Dresden. About 29 p. 8°. Dresden, [Burdach], 1867. Kaiser (Hermann). Die preussische gesetzge- bung in bezug auf urheberrecht, buchhandel und presse. Zusammenstellung aller auf diesen gebieten zur zeit giiltigen gesetze und verordnungen nebst gerichtlichen entschei- dungen,anmerkungenunderlauterungen her- ausgegeben von H. Kaiser, xliv, 304 p, 8°. Berlin, E. H. Schroeder, 1862. Same : Erganzungsheft. xxii p. 1 1. 168 p. 8°. Berlin, E. H. Schroeder, 1865. Kant (Immanuel). Von der unrechtmSssig- keit des bilchernachdrucks. 1785. In his Sammtliche werke. Herausgegeben von Karl Rosenkranz und Friedr. Wilh. Schubert, 7ten theils iste abtheilung. 8°. Leipzig, L. Voss, 1838, p. 155-167. Note. — Originally published in " Berliner monats- schrift," May 1785. Same. Analysis of Kant's doctrine of the rights of authors. [By Luther Stearns Gush- ing.] /» "The American jurist." v. 22. 12°. Boston, 1840, p. 84-92. Same. Over het onregtmatige van het na- druk. In "Tijdschrift voor staathuishoud- kunde en statistiek." (2de serie. 5de deel), 8°. Zwolle, 1859, P- 92-IOI- Kapp (Friedrich). Der deutsch-amerikanische buchhandel. In " Deutsche rundschau." 4ter jahrgang. 8°. Berlin, heft 4, Jan. 1878, p. 42-70. Kayser (Albert Cristopher). Die abstellung des buchernachdrucks, als ein in der neuesten kaiserlichen wahlkapitulation der reichsober- hauptlichen abhulfe ebenso nothig als unbe- denklich zu iibertragender gegenstand be- trachtet. 8°. Regensburg, 1790. Kenrick (W:) An address to the artists and manufacturers of Great Britain [etc.] To which is added, an appendix, containing strictures on some singular consequences at- tending the late decision on literary property. 4°. London, Domville, 1774. Anon, review in '* The Monthly review." v. 51. 8% London, Oct, 1774, p, 276-381. LITERARY PROPERTY. Kent (James). Commentaries on American law. V. 2. 8°. New York, O. Halsted, 1837. _ Contains^ : Personal property. III. Of original acquisi- tion by intellectual labour, p. 298-313. Also in the same : 12th ed., edited by O. W. Holmes, jr. V. 2. 8®. Boston, Little, Brown, & co., 1873, p. [474-511]. Kern (J. Conrad). La convention entre la Suisse et la France sur la proprietfe littferaire, artistique et industrielle, du 30 juin 1864, et son application en Suisse, avec le texte du traite et d'autres documents officiels. 8°. Paris, J. Cherbuliez, 1867, Kerr (W: Williamson). Injunctions against the infringement of copyright. In A treatise on the law of injunctions. By W: W. Kerr. 8°. London, W. Maxwell & son, 1867, p. 439-473- Also in_ the same: Edited by W: A. Herrick. 8". Boston, Little, Brown, & Co., 1871, p. 456-492. Also in the same : 2d ed. 8°. London, W. Maxwell & son, 1878, p. 317-356, Also in the same: 2d Am., from the 2d Eng. ed. edited by W: A. Herrick. 8°. Boston, Little, Brown, & CO., 1880, p. 256-291, or p. *3i7-*356. Kletke (G. M.) Gesetzgebung des konigreichs Bayern ilber den schutz des eigenthums an erzeugnissen der literatur und kunst gegen veroffentlichung, nachbildung und nach- druck, sowie musikalischer und dramatischer werke gegen unbefugte auffuhrung ; ferner iiber die freiheit der presse und des buch- handels, und bestrafung des missbrauchs der presse. About 103 p. 8°. Regensburg, Pus- tel, i860. Klostermann (Rudolf). Das geistige eigen- thura an schriften, kunstwerken und erfin- dungen, nach preussischem und iniernation- alem rechte dargestellt. i. Bd. Allgemeiner theil. — Verlagsrecht und nachdruck. xii, 452 p. 8°. Berlin, L Guttentag, 1867. Note. Volume 2 treats of patents. Same : i. Band. Das urheberrecht und das verlagsrecht nach Deutschen und aus- landischen gesetzen systematisch und ver- gleichend dargestellt. Nebst einem anhange : Das urheberrecht an schriftwerken etc. nach dem reichsgesetze vom ii. Juni 1870. 2 p. \. xii, 452 p. 2 I. 74 p. 8°. Berlin, I. Gutten- tag, 1871. Das urheberrecht an schrift- und kunst- werken, abbildungen, compositionen, photo- graphien, mustern und modellen, nach deut- schem und internationalem rechte systema- tisch dargestellt. viii, 282 p. 8°. Berlin, F. Vahlen, 1876. Das urheberrecht an schriftwerken, abbil- dungen, musikalischen compositionen und dramatischen werken nach dem reichsgesetze vom II. Juni 1870 systematisch dargestellt. 2 p. 1. 74 p. 8°. Berlin, L Guttentag, 1871. Knigge (Adolph Franz Friedrich Ludwig, freiherr von). Ueber den biichernachdruck, an Joh. Gottwerth Miiller. 8°, Hamburg, A. Campe, 1791. Kohler (J.) Das autorrecht, eine zivilistische abhandlung. In " JahrbUcher fiir die dog- matilc d. beutigen romischen und deutschen privatrechts. Herausgegeben von R. Jher- ing." V. 18. 8°. Jena, 1880, p. 129-478. Kohler (J.) Same : Zugleich ein beitrag zur lehre vom eigenthum, vom miteigenthum, vom rechtsgeschaft und vom individualrecht. (Separatabdruck mit register versehn). i p. 1, 352 p. 8°. Jena, G. Fischer, 1880. Korb (Ferdinand). Was heisst und ist das geistige eigenthum an literarischen erzeug- nissen. Ein beitrag zur theorie des nach- drucks und verlagsrechts. i p. 1. 96 p. 1 1. 8°. Breslau, A. Gosohorsky, 1869. Kowalzig (F.) Das reichsgesetzliche urheber- recht an schriftwerken, das reichshaftpflicht- gesetz, das reichs- und territorialgesetz- liche versicherungsrecht, die altpreussischen und gemeinrechtlichen bestimmungen iiber schiedsgerichte erlautert. About iv, 163 p. 8°. Berlin, Springer, 1877 p. e. 1876.] Kramer (Wilhelm August). Die rechte der schriftsteller und verleger. Ein versuch. 2 p. 1. 164 p. 8°. Heidelberg, C. F. Winter, 1827. Krause (Chr. Sigismund). Ueber biichernach- druck. [Motto] That's wormwood. — Hamlet. 4 p. 1. 52 p. 12°. Stuttgart, A. F. Macklot, 1817. Krug (Wilhelm Traugott). Schriftstellerei, buchhandel und nachdruck rechtlich, sitt- lich und kluglich betrachtet. Eine wissen- schaftliche priifung des Wangenheim'schen vortrags dariiber beim bundestage. viii, 123 p. 8°. Leipzig, F. A. Brockhaus, 1823. KUhns (Friedrich Julius). Gesetzentwurf der deutschen kunstgenossenschaft betreiTend das recht des urhebers an werken derbilden- den kilnste nebst einerrechtfertigenden denk- schrift. About 54 p. 8°. Berlin, E. H. Schro- der, 1864. Der rechtsschutz an werken der bildenden kunste. Eine denkschrift im namen der deutschen kunstgenossenschaft. About 53 p. 8°. Berlin, I. Guttentag, 1864. Laboulaye (Edouard Renfe Lefebvre). De la propri6t6 littferaire en Angleterre. In " Revue de legislation et de jurisprudence." Nouv. coll. v. I. 8°. Paris, 1852, p. 129-187. Same : (26me article). Legislation de la propriety littSraire (copyright) en Angleterre [et aux !filats-Unis.] In " Revue de legisla- tion et de jurisprudence." Nouv. coll. v. 2. 8°. Paris, 1852, p. 289-321. Etudes surlaproprieteiitteraireen France et en Angleterre, suivies des trois discours prononcfes an parlement d'Angleterre par sir T. Noon Talfourd, traduits de I'anglais par Paul Laboulaye. 3 p. 1. liv p. i 1. 200 p. 8°. Paris, A. Durand, 1858. Contents: I. De la propriete litt^raire en France, I 1. p. i-liv. II. De la propriiit^ litt^raire en Angleterre : Histoire du droit de propriite litteraire (copyright) en Angleterre, p. 1-82 : Discours par M. Talfourd [18 May 1837, 25 April 1838 and 28 Feb. 1839], p. 83-151: Lois anglaises sur la propriete litt6raire et convention avec la France. [Edited by Paul Laboulaye] , p. 153-199. See also Association pour la defense de Is propriete litteraire. LITERARY PROPERTY. 23 Laboulaye (Paul), fitude sur le droit de pro- prifetfe littSraire en Allemagne. In " Revue historique de droit franfais et Stranger." ifere annfee. 8°. Paris, 1855. Same. About 36 p. 8°. Paris, A. Durand, 1855-. .See also Talfourd (Sir T: Noon). Three speeches in favour of copyright. Trois discours [etc.] 1858. Lacan (Adolphe Jean Baptiste) ««in." v. 30, p. g8. Patent right (Cop. and), v. 6, p. 168. Perpetual cop. v. 21, p. 293. Philadelphia cop. scheme, v. 31, p. 420, 442, 458. Piracy by memory. *. 33, p, 224. v. ^, 34, P- 434- Pirates of Penzance." v. 30, p. 97. Plays. V. 20, p. 78. Prince-Smith (J:) v. 14, p. 422. Prints from paintings, v. 2, p. 6ir. "Protection" cop. v. 31, p. 420, 442, 458.. "Publishers and int. cop." v. 29, p. 340- Putnam (G: Haven), v. 29, p. 341. Quaas (Eduard). v. 30, p. 177. Rae (W: Eraser), v. '32, p. 236. Sedgwick (Arthur G:) v. 27, p. 190. V. 28, p. 303. V. 29, p. 340. v. 33, p. 22Q. _ V. 34, p. 7. "Simple justice." v. 6, p. 265. Songs (cop. in), v. 3, p. 24. Stage-right decision, v. 33, p. 224. Thomas (Moy). v. 27, p. 84. Ticknor & Fields vs. Bunce and Hunt- ington. V. I, p. 437. Twain (Mark) see Clemens (S: Lang- home). Van Voorst vs. Hogg. v. ai, p. 151. Walker (Alfred Eastman), v. 6, p. 168. Wingate- Laidley controversy. v. 29, p. 401 . "Who owns an author's ideas?" v. 4, p. 520. LITERARY PROPERTY. 31 National association for the promotion of so- cial science. Transactions 1859-1880. 8°. London, 1860-81. Contains; 1839. On the protection of property«in in- tellectual labour as embodied in inventions, books, de- signs, and pictures. By T:' Webster, p. 237-244 ; On international copyright property in works of literature and the fine arts. [Summary of paper by Delabere Roberton Blaine], p. 27:^ 273. — 1862. On international copyright in works of liteTatute, music, and the fine arts. By D. R. Blaine, p. 866-869.— 1866. On the best means of extending and securing an interoational law of copy- right. By Anthony Trollope, p. 119-125, and discussion, p. 243, 244. — 1874. On patent and copyright monopolies. By Robert Andrew Macfie, p. 256-261. — 1879. What ac- tion should be taken on the report of the Royal commis- sion on copyright ? By C; H: E: Carmichael, p. 193-204 ; [Review of the evidence of the copyright commission on the royalty system. By J. N. Porter], p. 446, 447. — 1880. Trade marks and copyright. How can the international difficulty with regard to trade marks and copyright, caused by recent judgments of the supreme court of the United States^ best be met? By C: H: E: Carmichael, p. 15^-164 ; Literary copyright : how to practically deal with It. By R. A. Macfie, p. 164-171 ; Copyright. Re- port of a sub-committee appointed Dec. 3, 1880, and adopted by the council, Feb. 17, 1881. [Siened by J: Westlake, J: Leyboum Goddard, and W: Fooks], p. 86z- 865. Neff (Paul). Ueber die eigenthumsrechte der schriftsteller und kUnstler und ihrer rechts- nachfolger. 16 p., 8°. Stuttgart, P. NeiF, 1838. Neumann (Max). Beitrage zum deutschen verlags- und nachdrucksrechte bei werken der bildenden ktlnste, im anschluss an die frage vom rechtsschutze derphotographiege- gen nachdruck. xii, 142 p. 8°. Berlin, I Guttentag, 1866. Der rechtschutz der photographie gegen nachdruck nach den deutschen nachdrucksge- setzen. Eine denkschrift. About 50 p. 8°. Leipzig, R. Hoflfmann in comm., 1866. Neustetel (Leopold Joseph). Der biicher- nachdruck, nach rftmischem recht betrachtet. ip. 1. 84p. 12°. Heidelberg, C. Groos, 1824. New (The) copyright bill. ^Anon.y In " The Eclectic review." N. s. v. 3. 8 . London, June 1838, p. 693-704. New (The) copyright law. [Atton.] In "The American monthly magazine," v. 11, or v. 5, 11. s. 8°. New York, no. 2. Feb. 1838, p. 105-112. Newcomb (Simon). See Andrews (E: L.) Neyron (Pierre Joseph, translator). See Put- ter (Johann Stephan). La propri6t6 littfe- raire dfefendue, 1774. NicKLiN (Philip Houlbrooke). Remarks on literary property. 144 p. 16°. Philadelphia, P. H. Nicklin & T. Johnson, 1838. Contains also : Copyright by Joseph Lowe, p. g;[-i44. A non. review signed C. [Luther Stearns Cushing ?] in " The American jurist." v. 19. 8°. Boston, p. 476- 479- Anon, revieiv [By Willard Phillips] in " The North American review, v. 48. 8*. Boston, no. 102, Jan. 1839, p. 257-270. Seeaho Literary property. NicoLSON (James Badenach). [Law of copy- right.] In Erskin (J:) An institute of the 8°. Paris, 1846, p. \Anon.\ In I. fol. New , no. 7, Feb. law of Scotland, v. i. 4°. Edinburgh, Bell & Bradfute, 1871, p. 264-269. NiGON DE Berty (Louis). See Gastambide (Jo- seph Adrien). NiMROD. Pseud. Common-law rights to lit- erary property. In " The Albany law jour- nal." V. 15. 4°. Albany, June 9, 1877, p. 445-447 ; June 16. 1877, P- 465-468. NiON (Alfred). Droits civils des auteurs, ar- tistes et inventeurs, ou application des dispo- sitions des codes civil, de commerce et de procedure, aux droits attribu6s par les lois existantes aux auteurs et inventeurs en ma- tifere d'art, de science, de littferature et d'in- dustrie. 2 p. 1. iii, 488 p. 8°. Paris, Jou- bert, 1846. Anon. Review by G. M. [Gustave de Molinari ?] in "Journal des economistes." v. t6. 8°. Paris, 1847, p. 88, 89. Review by Raymond de Fresquet in " Revue de droit frani^ais et fitranger." v. 13, part 2. ~~ 18 seq. No international copyright law. "The American athenaeum." v. York, no. i, Jan. 4, 1868, p. — 15, 1868, p. 105, 106. NocH einige worte iiber den bilchernachdruck und zugleich uber den buchhandel. [Anon.^ 8°. Pappenheim, 1823. Norman (J: Paxton). The law and practice of the copyright, registration and provisional registration of designs ; and the copyright and registration of sculpture ; with practical directions : the remedies, pleadings & evi- dence in cases of piracy : with an appendix of statutes [etc.]. xii, 185 p. 16°, London, S. Sweet, 1851. Norton (C: Eliot). See The Publishers' week- ly- Norway. See Annuaire de legislation fetran- gfere. 1875, 1876 & 1877. NoTf. sur la propri^te littferaire, 1836. See Baudouin (Alexandre). NovELLo (Joseph Alford.) The true theory of literary copyright. In " The Athenaeum. 1862, part 2. 4°. London, no. 1821, Sept. 20, 1862, p. 371, 372. Same. Abstract in "The Jurist." N. s. v. 8, part 2. 8°. London, no. 404, Oct. 4, 1862, p. 447, 448. Observations occasioned by the contest about literary property. 1770. ii,? Law (Edmund). Observations on the law of copyright. 1838. See Webster (G;). Observations sur I'article 18 du projet de loi contenant la propri6t6 littferaire. [Anon.] 8°. Paris, Crapelet, 1839. Of the copy-right and good will of newspapers. [Amn.] In "The United States law intel- ligencer and review." Ed. by Joseph K. Angell. v. 3. 8°. Philadelphia, no. 12, Dec. 1831. P- 443-450. On international copyright. [Anon.'] /« "Tins- ley's magazine." v. 9. 8 . London, Dec. 1871, p. 528-533. 32 LITERARY PROPERTY. On the justice and expediency of establishing an international copyright law. [Anon.] In " The Metropolitan magazine." American ed. V 2. 8°. New York, Aug. 1836, p. 63-68. Same. De la proprifetl littferaire en Eu- rope, et de la nfecessit^ d'en rfegler Taction par une loi internationale. lAnon. A free translation with additions.] /» " Revue britannique." 4e s6rie. v. 4. 8°, Paris, aout 1836, p. 255-274. {_Note. This, together with an article from " Revue de Pari," 9 Oct. 1836, was published without title, about iv- 16 p. 8°. Paris, Everat, 1836. Oppen (Otto Heinrich Alexander von). Bei- trage zur revision der gesetze : i. Biicher- nachdruck. 2. Duell. 3. Ehe und scheid- ung. 4. Gesinderecht. vi, 161 p. 8°. Koln am Rhein, J. P. Bachem, 1833. Contains : tjeber buchernachdruck, p. r-44. Ortloff (Hermann Friedrich). Das autor- und verlagsrecht als strafrechtlich zu schfltz- endes recht. In "Jahrbucher fiir die dog- matik d. heutigen ramischen und deutschen privatrechts. Herausgegeben von Rud. Iher- ing. v. 5. 8° Jena. Osgood (S:) See Copyright (The) association. Paillottet (Prosper). Examen du systdme de M. [Pierre Jules] Hetzel sur la proprifetfe lit- tferaire. /« " Journal des ^conomistes." 2e s6rie. v. 34. 8°. Paris, 1862, p. 430-444. See also De la propri6t6 intellectuelle. 1859. — Vermeire (P.) Palfrey (J: Gorham). International copy- right. In "The North American review." V. 55. 8°, Boston, no. 116, July 1842, p. 245-264. Parsons (Theophilus). Laws of business. Re- vised ed. 8°. Hartford, S. S. Scranton & CO., 1875. Contains : The law of copyright. [With forms.] p. S91-598. . Also in the same: 1876, p. 59^-598; 1879, p. 695-702 ; 1880, p. 695-702. Parton (James). International copyright. In " The Atlantic monthly." v. 20. 8°. Bos- ton, Oct. 1867, p. 430-45 r. Same. In Topics of the times. By J. Parton. 12°. Boston, J. R. Osgood & co., 1871, p. 95-131- Same. Abridged. In Duyckinck (Evert A:) «»>-.) v. 14, p. 781. Harper's Weekly, v. 19, p. 17, 432. v. 21, p. 302, 599. v. 22, p. 547, 837. Hart (James Morgan), v. 15, p. 397. v. 22, p. 839. Hastings (G: Woodyatt). v. 19, p. 459. Hay (J:) v. 16, p. 881. Hazard (Willis P.) v. i, p. 199,208, 363. Headley (J: Tyler), v. 15, p. 398. Higginson (T: Wentworth), v. 17, p. 82. HilUT:) v. 15,0.562. Hoby vs. The Grosvenor Library, v. 17, p. 335. Holland (Josiah Gilbert), v. 10, p. 537. V. 15, P' 352- V. 17, p. 425, 426. V. 19, p. 459. Holmes (Oliver Wendell), v. 16, p. 881. Holt (H:) & CO. V. 14, p. 115, 281, 844. V. 22, p. 907. Hood (T:). v. 19. p. 18. Houghton, Mifflin & co. v. 22, p. 866. " Howard." v. 10, p. 474, 569. Howard (Bronson), v. 15, p. 713. Howells (W: Dean), v. 15, p. 262. Imported cop. books, v. 14, p. 534. Ingelow (Jean), v, 18, p. 236, 302. v. 21, p. 406, Int. Literary Association, v. 19, p. i6o» 333. 432, 532- V. 20, p. 851. Irving (Washington), v 16, p. 805, 807. V. 17, p. 23, 298. Italian cop, case. v. 9, p, 476. James (H:, jr.) v. 20, p. 164. Japan, v. X9i P< 694< '* Justice," Letter by. v. i, p. 95. King (E:) Authors' rights, v. 20, p. 491. Lathrop (G: Parsons), v. 18, p. 12. Law Amend. Soc. v. 19, p. 433. Law Times (London), v. 16, p. 474. Lawrence vs. Cupples. v. 9, p. 327, Lea (H: C:) v. 15, p. 696. v. 16. p. 220. V. 19, p. 17. L6vy (Calmann) vs. Reveil newspaper. V. 17, p. 457. Leypoldt (F:) See Editorial. Library Com. of Congress, v. i, p. 135, 231. v. 3, p. 191. Lindsay & Blakiston. v. 15, p. 239. Lippincott (J. B.) & co. v. 1, p. 184. V. 15, p. 197. V. 22, p. 866. Lippincott (Walter), v. 18, p. 550. Literary Congress (London), v. 15. p. 711, 712. V. 20, p. 608. V. 21, p, 509. (Madrid), v. 20, p. 405. (Milan). V. 20, p, 405. (Paris). V, 13, p. 405, 442. V. 14, p. 13, 119. (Rome). V. 21, p. 602, 644. (Vienna), v. 20, p. 164, 405, 491. Literary World, v. 19, p. 18. v, 21, p. 644. Liverpool Congress, v. 22, p. 254. London Bookseller. See Bookseller. London Daily Telegraph, v. 19, p. London Law Times. See Law Times. London Publishers' Circular. See Pub- lishers' Circular. London Times. See Times. Longfellow (H: Wadsworth). v. 15, p. 262. v. 21, p. 453. "Hyperion. v. 21, p. 406,429. " Outre-mer." v. 21, p. 406, 429. Longman (C: James), v. ig, p, 408. Longman (T:) v. i, p. 441. Lossing (Benson J:) v. 15, p. 582. Lovell (J: Wurtele). v. i8, p. 303. v. 31, p. 406, 429. Low (Sampson), v. 22, p. 838, 867, 886. Lucas vs. Cooke, v. 17, p. 335. Lucas vs. Luks. v, 17, p. 335. M. (E.) Sie Marston (E:) Macfie (Robert Andrew), v. 15, p. 699. v. 16, p, 12, MacmiUan (Alexander), v, i, p. 36. Macquoid (Katharine S.) v. 22, p. 868. Mailing (Free) of cop. copies, v. 16, p. 807. Manuscript (cop. in), v. 14, p. 237. Mark Twain. See Clemens (S: I-.) Marsh (G: Perkins), v, 15, p. 469. Marston (E:) v. 15, p. 341, 508, 581, 601. v. ig, p. 407. V. 20, p. 467, 492, 519. V. 21, p. 56. v. 22, p. 868. Martineau (Harriet), v. 21, p. 194. Medical literature and int. cop. v. 21, p. 138. Medical news. v. 21, p. 138. Miller (Andrew) vs. Taylor (Robert), v. 15, p. 78. Mitchell (Donald Grant), v. 15, p. 468, Morgan (James Appleton). v. 9, p. 355. V. 14, p, 299. v. 15, p. 511. v. 16, p. 221, Morrill (Lot M.) v. 3, p. 194, Mullen (S:) v. 15, p. 398, Musical cop. v. 21, p. 644, v. 22, p. 548. Nation (New York), v. 12, p. 446. v. 17, p. 297, V. 18, p. 857. Newcomb (Simon), v, 20, p. 577, 6og, New York Evening Post. v. 15, p. 147. y. 18, p. 236, 518. V. 20, p. 491. V. 21, p. 303> 454. V. 22, p. 230, 430, 431. 547i 651. New York Herald, v. 18, p. 264, 486, 518, 857, 861. V. 19, p. 406. V. 32, P- 234. LITERARY PROPERTY. 39 New York Publishers, v. i, p. gi, 134- ^ New York Sun. v. 14, p, 780, v.«22, p. 432- New York Times, v. 17, p. 335. v. 18, p. 487. V. 19, p. 16, 306, 694. V. so, p. 884. V. 22, p. 838, 886, 906. New York Tribune, v. 13, p. 246. v. 18^ p. 610, 857. V. 20, p. 163, 519, 547, S77> 798* 825. V. 21, p. 56, 275, 303. V. 22, p. 612, 838, 866. Nimmo (J: C.) v. 13, p. 527, 631. Nineteenth tThe) century, v. 21, p. S31. Norton (C: Eliotj. v. 15, p. 353, 583. " One of the Committee. ' v. i, p. 231. Opinions of publishers and authors. V. 15, p. 197, 239, 262, 306, 352, 396, 468. V. 16, P* 881. V. 17, p. 82. Osgood (J. R.) V. IS, p. 582. " Ouida.**^ See De la Ram^. Our Continent, v. 21, p. 358,550. Pall Mall Gazette, v. 22, p. 33. Palmer (E: H:) v. 2, p. 653. Parton (James), v. 15, p. 353. v. 16, p. 221. Payne (Prof.) v. 20, p. 163, 164. Phelps (Elizabeth Stuart), v. 15, p. 397- Philadelphia bill. v. 19, p. 17. Philadelphia Book Trade Association, . V. 22, p. 517, 546. Philadelphia Ledger, v. 18, p. 547. Philadelphia North American, v. 18, p. 488, 547. Philadelphia Publishers, v, i. p. 6g, 71, 182, 208. V, j8, p. 518, 547. Philadelphia Telegraph, v. 18, p. 488. Photographs, v. 21, p. 508. Pierson (Hamilton W.) v. 21, p. 139. Piracy, v. 22, p. 230, Pirate ^The new), v. 22, p. 431 . Poole (W: F:) v. 16, p. 881, v. 18, p. 836. Postal matters, v. 19, p. 461. Prang (L.) & co. v. 19, p, 487. Prices of books abroad, v. 22, p. 33. Prime (S: Iraneus). v. 15, p. 396, Prime (W. I.) v. 15, p. 79. Publishere' Circular (London), v. i, P- 36) 37' V. 2, p. 134, V. 19, p. 266, 305, 406, 459. V. 21, p. 275. V. 22, p. 548. Putnam (G: Haven), v. 15, p. 73, 151, 193, 194, 236, z6o, 283, 305, 350, 509, 699. V. i8,p. 856, 858. Putnam (G: Haven) vs. Pollard (Wal- ter F.) V. 17, p. 23, 384. Putnam's (G: P.) sons. v. 16, p. 807. V. 20, p. 798. V. 22, p. 866. Putnam^s (G: P.) sons. vs. Meyer (Leo. F.) V. 17, p. 384. Pym (Horace N.) v. 22, p. 868. Quaas (Eduard), v. 17, p. 297. Rae (W: Fraser). v. 20, p. 825. Randolph (Anson Davis Fitz). v. 1, p. 134- Reade (C:) v. 14, p. 534, 535. v. 18, p. 859. Ripley (G:) v. 15, p. 167. Roberts Brothers, v. 15, p. 197. v.17, p. 237. v. 18, p. 236, 302. Robinson (F. W.) v, 22, p. 838, 868. Robinson's cop, bill. v. 21, p. 454. Roe (E; Payson), v, 15, p. 396. v, 20, _P- 547. Royal cop. com. See British cop com. Royalty scheme, v. 15, p. 580. Russell (W. Clark), v. 22, p. 612, 867, 886. Schuberth (E.) & co. vs. Shaw (W. F.) V. 17, p. 212. Scribner us. Stoddart. v. 17, p. 23, 25. Scribner's (C:) sons. v. 22, p. 866. Scribner's Monthly, v. 20, p. 163. Sedgwick (Arthur G:) v. 15, p. 77. Seizure of imported cop. books, v. 22, p. 230. Sherman's (J:) bill, v. i, p. 199, 209, 2631 295- V. IS, p. 440. Silver Gray. v. 21, p. 408, 430. Sraalley (G. W.) v, 14, p. 114, 115, 1x9. V. 20, p. 163, 519, 825. V. 21, p. 275> 303. V. 22, p. 612, 838. Smiles (S:) vs, Belford Brothers, v. lo, p. 700. Smith (Walter), v. 19, p. 487. Solberg (Thorvald). Bibliography of literary property. Announced, v. zo, p. 147 : Index to cop. art. in the Pub- lisher^ Weekly^ v. zo, p. 205 : Cata- logue (A, J. K.-Carey), v. 21, p. 381- 384; (Carlyle-Congr^s), p. 473-475 ; (Congr^s-Drone), p. 504-506 ;(Drone- Fischer), p. 529-530 ; (FisheivGou- jon), p. 548-549 ; (Goumot-Great- Britain), v. 22, p. 30-32 ; Griesinger- Kapp), p. 578-581 ; (Kayser-Le Senne), p. 609-611 ; (Letter-Mac- leod), p. 904-905. Sower, Potts &co. v. 15, p. 239. Spain. V. 15, p. 198. Spencer (Herbert), v. 19, p. 512. SpofFord (Ainsworth Rand) , v . j., p. 42. V. 9, p. 529. Springfield Republican, v. zo, p. 884. Stanley (H: M.) suits, v. 14, p. 357, 534, 536, 596. V. 15, p. 490. Stedman (Edmund Clarence), v. 15, p. 353- V. 17, p. 604, 605. V. 18, p, 857. V. 20, p. 163. Steiger (E.) v. 22, p. 517. Stevenson (J. B.) v. 22, p. 907. Stillman (Mr.) v. i, p. 36. Stoddart (J. M.) & co. vs. Key, Hall ; and Scribner, Armstrong & co. v. 17, p. 516. Stoddart (J. M.) & co. vs. Warren (Mo- ses). v. 15, p. 341, 355. Syndicat pour la protection de la pro- pri^t^ httiraire, v. 21, p. g. Sypher (J. R.) v. 15, p. 355- Tarm on books, v. 22, p. 517, 546,547, 839, 869, go6. Tauchnitz editions, v. 22, p. 432. TawseCG:) v. i,p. 68. Terhune (Mary Virginia), v. 15, p. 353. Thomas (Moy), v. 14, p. 214. Three months stipulation. v. 20, p. 798. V. 21, p. 56. THton (Frances E.) vs. Gill(W: F.) v. ^, P' 476- Times (London), v. 15, p. 699. v. zS, p. 265. V. 20, p. 467, 519. Tomlinson (J: H.) v. 10, p. 472. Tourgee (Albion Winegar). v, aij ^P- 358, 550. Treasury Department ruling, v. 22, p. 230, 839. Treaty (Cop.) v^. 18, p. 323, 610, 835. Twain (Mark). See Clemens (S: L.) Tyler (M.C.) v. 15, p. 511. Van Antwerp, Bragg & co. v. 15, _p. 306. Victor (O, J.) V. 15, p. 469. W. (J. V.) Letter, v. i, p. 182. Ward (U. D.) v. 10, p. 473. Warner (C: Dudley), v. 17, p. 82. Warner (Miss Susan), v. 15, p. 396. Wells (D: Ames), v. 15, p. 352. West (Sackville). v. 20, p. 147. Whipple (Edwin Percy). v. 15, p. 583. Whitaker (Joseph) . v. i, p. 393. White (R: Grant), v. 19, p. 304, 333, 407. Whitney (Adeline D. Train), v. 17, p. 82. Wiley (J:) v. 15, p. 239. v. 22, p. 866, 889. Wingate-Laidley case. v. 17, p. 213, Winsor (Justin), v. 16, p. 881. Wood (WO & CO. V. iSj p. 262. Woolsey (Theodore Dwight). v. 15, p. 352- Woolsey petition, v. 19, p. 17. Young's Concordance, v. 21, p. 476. PuRDAY (C: H:) Copyright. A sketch of its rise and progress : the acts of parliament and conventions with foreign nations now in force, with suggestions on the statutory re- quirements for the disposal and security of a copyright, literary, musical and artistic. 2 p. 1. 132 p. 8°. London, Reeves & Turner, 1877. Putnam (G: Haven). International copyright considered in some of its relations to ethics and political economy. An address deliv- ered Jan. 29, 1878, before the New York free- trade club. 2 p. 1. 54 P- 8*". New York, G. P. Putnam's sons, 1879. [Economic mon- ographs, no. 15.] Same. About 54 P- S'*- London, 1879. Same. In " The Publishers' weekly." v. 15. 8°, New York, 1879, "o- 37o. Feb. 15, p. 194-196 ; no. 371, Feb. 22, p. 236-238 ; no. 372, March i, p. 260-261 ; no. 373, March 8, p. 283-285 ; no. 374, March 15, p. 305- 306 ; no. 375, March 22, p. 350-352. v. 18, no. 467, Dec. 25, 1880, p. 858-859. Same: Internationaler schutz gegen den nachdruck. In einiger seiner beziehungen auf ethik und politische oekonomie betrachtet. Ein vortrag, gehalten am 29. Januar 1879 im Nev^- Yorker free-trade club. Deutsch von Eduard Wiebe. 59 p. 8^ Berlin, F. Vah- len, 1880. Anon, notice in " The Academy." v. 15. 4". London, no. 364 new series, April 26, 1879, p. 365. Anon, notice in "Triibner's American and Oriental literary record." v. 12. 4°. London, nos. 9, 10, p. 112. Messrs. Putnam and international copy- right. [Letter from G: H. Putnam, New York, April 29, 1S79. -^« **The Academy." V. 15. 4°. London, no. 367* May 17, 1879, p. 437. and Putnam (J: R.) Authors and pub- lishers. A manual of suggestions for be- 40 LITERARY PROPERTY. ginners in literature, comprising a description of publishing methods and arrangements. [Anon.'] 2 p. 1. 96 p. 8°. New York, G. P. Putnam's sons, 1883. Contains : Securing copyright, p. 27-43. VS. Pollard (Walter F.) See Alexander & Green. Putnam (G: Palmer). The copyright question. /» " The Literary world." v. i. 4°. New York, no. 26, July 31, 1847, p. 611-612. Putnam's monthly magazine, v. i-io and new series, v. 1-6, 1853-1857 & 1868-1870. 8°. New York, G: P. Putnam & co., 1853-70. Contains : v. i, 1853. International copyright, edito- rial notes, p. 335-— V. 2, 1853. Notes from H: C: Carey, p. 220-231 ; Letter from H: C: Carey [International copy- right], p. 342-344. — V. 3, 1S54. Literary piracy. [Anon. review by C: F: Briggs of " Letters on international copyright." By H: C: Carey. Philadelphia, A. Hart, 1853], p. 96-103 : Letter to the editor [regarding H: C;- Carey's views on international copyright ; signed by G. W. E., PhillipSj Me., Jan. ai, 1854], p. 332-333. — v. 9, 1857. International copyright. [Anon."], p. 85-91. — Newseries, V. i, 1868. Int. cop., editorial, p. 517: The right of copyright. A concise statement of the question. [Anon."], p. 635-637 : Brief editorial notice of the organ- ization of the Copyright Association, p. 776. — v. 2, 1868. Int. cop., [editorial notice of the proceedings of the In- ternational copyright association], p. 120. — v. 3, 1869. £Int. cop. Auerbach's " The Villa on the Rhine," editori- si]i p. 754-755. — V 4, i86g. [Two letters from Sir T: Noon Talfourd to Mr. G: P. Putnam on int. cop., dated Feb. 23 & 28, 1844], p. 559-560 : *^ Copyright" courtesies. [Remarks on the authorized translation of ^' The countess Gisela" by E. Marlitt, i.e. Eugenie John], p. 639-640. — v. 6, 1870 [Ed. notice of J: C. Hotten's '* Literary copy- right,'^ p. 240. Putter (Johann Stephan). Der bilchernach- druck nach achten grundsatzen des rechts gepriift. 7 p. 1. 206 p. 4°. Gottingen, im verlage der wittwe Vandenhoeck, 1774. Anon, review in "Gottingischeanzeigen von gelehrten sachen." v. i. i6''.' G5ttingen, 78. stiick, den 30. Junii 1774, p. 665-669. La propri6t6 littSraire d^fendue, ou bik- moire abrlg6 dans le qvel on examine jusqu'i quel point la contrefa^on pent etre legitime. Traduit de I'allemand [par Pierre Joseph Neyron.] 3 p. 1. 48 p. 8°. a Goettingue, chez la veuve d'A. Vandenhoeck, 1774. QUELQUES observations sur le projet de loi relatif i la propri6t6 littferaire. [Anon.} 4°. Fans, y. Renouard, 1839. Question (The) concerning literary property, determined by the court of king's bench on 2oth April, 1769, in the cause between Andrew Millar and Robert Taylor: with the separate opinions of the four judges [E; Willes, R: Aston, Joseph Yates and W: Murray, earl of Mansfield] ; and the reasons given by each, in support of his opinion, iv., 127 p. 4°. London, W. Strahan & M. Woodfall, for B. Tovey, 1773. A'i'/*,— Edited by Sir James Burrow. Willes's opinion occurs, p. 9-40; Aston s, p. 40-62; Yates's, p. 62-111; Mansfield's, p. 112-127. Rae (W: Fraser)„ English views of international copyright. [Anon, letter], London, March 18, 1881. /« "The Nation." v. 32. 4°. New York, no. 823, April 7, 1881, p. 236. International copyright. In " The Nine- teenth century." v. 10. 8°, London, no. 57, Nov, 1881, p. 723-734. Ralph (James). The case of authors by pro- fession or trade, stated ; with regard to book- sellers, the stage, and the public. No matter by whom. [Anon.] About 68 p. 8°. Lon- don, Griffiths, 1758. Ravelet (Armand). Code manuel de la presse, comprenant toutes les lois sur I'imprimerie la librairie — la presse p6riodique — I'affichage le colportage — les dfelits de presse et la pro- pri6t6 littferaire mises en ordre et annotfees d'apr^s la jurisprudence. About vii, 208 p. 16°. Paris, imp. Balitout, Questroy & cie, 1868. Same ; 26me 6d. 2 p. 1. viii, 225 p. 16°. Paris, F. Didot frferes, fils & cie, 1872. Contains ; De la propriety litteraire, p. 185-202. Reade(C:) The eighth commandment. 2 p. 1. 162 p. 5 1. 181-379 Ps I port- I facs. 8°. Lon- don, Triibner& co., i860. Note. — Deals entirely with the production of transla- tions from French dramas upon the English stage. Notice by James Fraser, in A handy-book of patent and copyright law. By James Fraser. 12". London, S. Low, son & tx}., i860, p. 223-238. [Letter on literary property.] In France. . Ministlre d'etat. (Commission de la propria liti&aire et artistique). Rapports 4 I'empe- reur. 4". Paris, 1863, p. 83-88. See also Mathews (C: James). — The Pub- lishers' weekly. Reasons for a modification of the act of Anne [etc.] 1813. See Turner (Sharon). Recht (Das) der briefe und photographien. 1863. See Wachter (Oscar). Recht (Das) des kiinstlers. 1859. *S'« Wach- ter (Oscar). Rechte (Die) der autoren auf dem congress zu Brilssel und in dem Entwurfe des Bbrsenve- reins der deutschen buchhandler. [Anon.] In " Deutsche vierteljahrs-schrift." 22ster jahrgang. 1859 : istes heft. 8°. Stuttgart und Augsburg, p. 185-217. Rechtliches und vernunftmassiges bedenken eines unpartheyischen rechtsgelehrten iiber den schandlichen nachdruck andern gehSri- ger bilcher. [Anon.] 8°. Frankfurt und Leipzig, 1774. Reflexionen fiber den biichernachdruck, be- sonders zu gewinnung eines neuen gesichts- punktes in betreff seiner widerrechtlichkeit. Aus veranlassung des vortrags der konig- lichen Wilrtembergischen gesandtschaft bei der hohen deutschen bundesversammlung. [Anon.] About 48 p. 8°. Heidelberg, Groos, 1823. Regnault (Theodore). See Godson (R:) De la proprifetfi littferaire. 1826. Reich (Ph. Erasmus). See Linguet (Simon Nicolas Henri). Betrachtungen Uber die rechte des schriftstellers. 1778. ReimArus (Johann Albert Heinrich). Der bUcherverlag, in betrachtung der schriftstel- ler, der verleger und des publikums noch- mals erwogen. [Anon.] 8°. Hamburg, 1773. ErwSgung des verlagsrechts in ansehung LITERARY PROPERTY. 41 des nachdrucks. About 35 p. 8°. Hamburg, Hoffman, 1792. Reimpression (La). 1851! See Hen (Charles). Renaudin (Edmond). Le congrfes interna- tional de la propriety artistique tenu k Paris en Septembre 1878. In " Journal des 6cono- raistes." 4e s6rie, v. 4. 8°. Paris, no. 10, Oct. 1878, p. 104-109. Le congrfes international littferaire tenu k Paris en 1878. In "Journal des 6cono- mistes." 46 serie. v. 3. 8°. Paris, no. 9, Septembre 1878, p. 395-398. Renault (Louis). De la proprifetfe littferaire et artistique au point de vue international. /» "Journal du droit international privfe." sme ann6e. 8°. Paris, 1878, nos. 3-4, p. 117- 138 ; nos. g-io, p. 454-477. Same: Extrait du Journal du droit inter- national privfe. About 47 p. 8°. Paris, Marchal, Billard & cie, 1879. Rendu (Ambroise). Le congrfes littferaire de Rome. /«"Le G6nie civil." v. 2. 4°. Paris, no. 16, 15 juin 1882, p. 383. Trait6 pratique du droit industriel ou ex- pose de la legislation et de la jurisprudence sur les fetablissements industriels, les brevets d'invention, la propriety industrielle, artis- tique etlitt^raire [etc.], par. A. Rendu, avec la collaboration de m. Charles Delorme. 8°. Paris, Cosse, 1855. Review by Charles Verge in "Journal des 6cono- mistes." ae s6rie. v. 9. 8". Paris, 1856, p. 287-289. RenouARD (Augustin Charles). Des droits des auteurs sur les produits de leur intelli- gence. In " Revue de legislation et de ju- risprudence." v. 5. 8°. Paris, 1837, p. 241- 274. Same.- [With changes and additions: ThSorie du droit des auteurs.] In Traite des droits d'auteurs, par A. C. Renouard. V. I. 8°. Paris, J. Renouard & cie, 1838, p. 433-475- Same : Theory of the rights of authors. [Translated by L. S. C, i.e. Luther Stearns Cushing, who has added : — Analysis of Kant's doctrine of the rights of authors.] In " American jurist and law magazine." V. 22. 12°. Boston, C: C. Little & J. Brown, Oct. 1839, pp. 39-92. Same : Theory of the rights of authors in literature, sciences, and the fine arts. (Trans- lated for and republished from the American jurist and law magazine for October, 1839.) [Signed L. S. C, i.e. Luther Stearns Cush- ing.] 56 p. 8°. Boston, C: C. Little & J. Brown, 1839. Thfeorie des droits des auteurs sur les pro- ductions de leur intelligence. In " Archives de droit et de legislation." v. i. 8°. Brux- elles, 1837, p. 27-49 of ist pagination. • Propriety litteraire, artistique, industrielle. In " Dictionnaire universel thfeorique et pra- tique du commerce et de la navigation." 2me fed. V. 2. 8°. Paris, Guillaumin & cie, 1863, p. 1255-1257- Renouard (Augustin Charles). Traite des droits d'auteurs, dans la littferature, les sci- ences et les beaux-arts. 2 v. 3 p. 1. 480 p. ; 2 p. 1. 501 p. 8°. Paris, J. Renouard & cie., 1838-39. Anon, review in " Archives de droit et de legislation." V. 3. 8*. Bruxelles, 1840, p. 220-224, See also Blanc (Etienne)3«(/Beaume (Alex- andre). — Pic (Fran9ois Antoine). Report (A) of the proceedings of a meeting (consisting chiefly of authors), held May 4th [1852], at the house of Mr. John Chap- man, 142 Strand, for the purpose of hasten- ing the removal of the trade restrictions on the commerce of literature. 3d ed. 30 p. 8°. London, J. Chapman, 1852. Note. — Reported by Mr. J: Chapman. Restelli (Francesco). Sulla proprieti let- teraria ed artistica. Memoria letta nelle tornate I5e 29 dicembre 1859. In " Atti del Reale istituto Lombardo di scienze, lettere ed arti." v. 2. fol. Milano, tipografia Ber- nardoni, i860, p. 28-44. RiCHTER (Karl). Kunst und wissenschaft und ihre rechte im staate. 2 p. 1. 220 p. 8°. Ber- lin, G. Jansen, 1863. RiDDER (J. Herman de). Beschouwingen over kopierecht. 8°. Utrecht, 1875. Right (The) of copyright. A concise state- ment of the question. [Anon.'] In "Put- nam's magazine." New series, v. i. 8°. New York, no. 5, May 1868, p. 635-637. Right (The) to sue for infringement of literary copyright. [Anon.] 7k "The Jurist." v. 17, part 2. 8°. London, no. 883, Dec. 10, 1853, p. 486-490. Ripley (G:) See Drone (Eaton Sylvester). RiTTER ( — Zand und stadtgerichis-ratK). Ueber nachdruck nach preussischem recht. About 96 p. 8°. Berlin, Mittler& sohn, 1845. Robertson (Edmund) and Drone (Eaton Syl- vester). Copyright. 7» " The Encyclopaedia Britannica." 9th ed. v. 6. 4°. Edinburgh, A. & C. Black, 1877, p. 356-367. Also in the same: " The Encyclopaedia Britannica," 9th ed. V. 6. 4". Boston, Little, Brown, & Co., 1877, p. 356-367. Also m ike same ; (American reprint), v, 6. 8*. Phila- delphia, J. M. Stoddart & co., 1877, p. 316-325. Robin (Eugene). De la contrefagon Beige. La situation r&elle. La librairie frangaise. In " Revue des deux mondes." Tome s^me I46me annfee, nouvelle sferie. 8°. Paris, 15 Janvier, 1844, p. 204-239. Contains: I, De la contrefa9on dtrangire : II, His- torique de la contrefagon des livres francais ; III. Situa- tion ac^uelle de la contrefagon beige : IV. De I'abolition de la contrefa^on beige. ROCCHIETTI (Joseph). Why a national litera- ture cannot flourish in the United States of North America. 84 p. 12°. New York, J. W. Kelley, 1845. Contains : International copyright, p. 61-69. Roe (E: Payson). See The Publishers' weekly. Rogers (H; Wade). Literary property. In 42 LITERARY PROPERTY. "The Central law journal." v. 12. 8°. St. Louis, no. 14, April 15, 1881, p. 338-343. In " The Irish law times." v. 15. Dublin, no. 749, June 4, 1881, p. Same. large 8°. 266-299. Same. In ' Pittsburgh legal journal." v. 11, old series, V. 28. 8°. Pittsburgh, no. 46, June 29, 1881, p. 417-419 ; no. 47, July 6, 1881, p. 427-429- Literary property at common law, [etc.] /»" The Federal reporter. " v. 17. 8°' Saint Paul, West publishing co., 1883, no. 7, Sept. 18, 1883, p. 593-603- Romberg (^douard). Compte rendu des tra- vaux du Congrfes de la propri^tfe littfiraire et artistique, suivi d'un grand nombre de docu- ments et d'un appendice contenant les lois de tous les pays sur les droits d'auteur, avec notices historiques. 2 v. 2 p. 1. xvi., 350 p. ; 2 p. 1. ii., 324 p. 8°. Bruxelles et Leipzig, 'k. Flatau, 1859. RoscOE (E:) A few words about copyright. In "The Victoria magazine." v. 19. 8°. Lon- don, August 1872, p. 340-345. R5SSIG (Karl Glo.) Handbuch desbuchhandels- rechts systematisch dargestellt fUr rechtsge- lehrte, buchhandler und schriftsteller. About 476 p. 8°. Leipzig, Hinrichs, 1804. ROTTECK (Carl Wenzeslas Rodecker von; and Welcker (Carl Theodor). Das staats-lexilcon. V. 9. 8°. Altona, J. F. Hammerich, 1847. Contains: Nachdruck. By P. Pfizer, with appendix by Carl Theodor Welcker, p. 326-333. RouTH (J: Martin). The law of artistic copy- right : a handy book for the use of artists, publishers, and photographers. With explan- atory dialogues. 2 p. 1. iv., 147 p. 12°. Lon- don, Remington & co., 1881. RiipiGER (Johann Chr. Eph.) Juristisch-phy- siokratischer briefwechsel uber verlagseigen- thum und nachdruck, auch andere gegen- stande der teutschen literaturpolizey. Erstes sendschreiben. [Anon.'} 8°. Dessau & Leip- zig, 1783. Juristisch-physiokratischer briefwechsel Tiber buchernachdruck und eigenthum an geisteswerken, mit herren von Sonnenfels, Ehlers, Becker und Krause. [Anon.] 8°. Halle, Dreissig, 1791. S. See Lowndes (J: James). S. The international copyright question. Pro- test against the doctrine of the Democratic review thereon. [Anon. With note by editor added.] In "The United States magazine and Democratic review." New series, v. 12. 8°. New York, no. 60, June 1843, p. 609- 616. S. (G.) British copyright in foreign works. [Anon.] /« "The Jurist." v. 12, part 2. 8°. London, no. 605, Aug. 12, 1848, p. 322-324. English copyright in foreign composition. [Anon.] In " The Jurist." v. 14, part 2. 8°. London, no. 684, Feb. 16, 1850, p. 46-49. Same. In "The United States monthly law magazine. Edited by J: Livingston." v. 2. 8°. New York, no. 6, Dec. 1850, p. E24-532. Same : English copyright in foreign com- positions. Reprinted from the Jurist. [Anon.] 8°. London, 1850. The importation of reprints of English books into the United Kingdom and the colo- nies. [Anon.] In "The Jurist." New series, v. 6, part 2. 8°. London, no. 266, Feb. II, i860, p. 44-46. Registration of literary copyright. [Anon.] /» " The Jurist." New series, v. 6, part 2. 8°. London, no. 265, Feb. 4, i860, p. 33-35. S. (V.) Ein wort uber die lage deutscher ver- leger von werken nicht deutscher urheber. [Anon.] In " Deutsche vierteljahrs schrift." 2tes heft, 1846. 8°. Stuttgart und Tubin- gen, nr. 34, p. 196-204. Saint Germain (J. T. de) pseuif. See Tardieu (Jules Romain). Sainte-Beuve (Charles Augustin). Rapport sur la proprifetfe littferaire. [6 juillet, 1866.] In Nouveaux lundis par C. A. Sainte-Beuve. v. 9. 12°. Paris, L6vy frferes, 1867, p. 453- 461. Salvandy (M. — de). Projet de loi sur les droits de propri6t6 litteraire et artistique, pr§- sentfe par m. de Salvandy, et votfe par la chambre des pairs en 1839. In Legislation de la propri6t6 litteraire et artistique par Jules Delalain. 8°. Paris, 1862, p. 97-102. Saunders (Robert) and Benning (W:) vs. Smith (J:W:)a«(/MAXWELL (Alexander). Copyright in law reports. The case of Saunders v. Smith. Before the vice-chancellor [June 8th and 9th, 1838] ; and on appeal before the lord chancellor [June 22d and 23d, 1838.] With a preface, table of cases cited, notes, and an appendix. By G: Morland Crawford, vii. p. 2 1., 60 p. 8°. London, A. Maxwell, 1839. Sauvage (Ren6 Eugene). Rfepublique des lettres, constitution de la propriety littferaire et de la librairie. About 20 p. 8°. Paris, E. Dentu, 1861. Saxony. Gesetz, den schutz der rechte an lite- rarischen erzeugnissen und werken der kunst betreflend ; vom 22sten Feb. 1844. [Also] Verordnung zu ausfiihrungdes gesetzes uber den schutz der rechte an literarischen erzeug- nissen und werken der kunst ; vom 22sten Feb. 1844. In " Gesetz- und verordnungsblatt fiir das kSnigreich Sachsen vom jahre 1844." 4°. Dresden, C. C. Reinhold & sohn, p. 27- 31 and p. 32-36. Same : Mit kritisch-exegetischen erlauter- ungen von dr. F. W. Meinert. 8°. Leipzle Teubner, 1844. ScHAFF (Philip). See Copyright (The) associa- tion. ScHAFFLE (Albert Eberhard Friedrich). Die nationalakonomische theorie der ausschlies- senden absazverhaitnisse insbesondere des litterarisch-artistischen urheberrechtes, des LITERARY PROPERTY. 43 patent-, muster- und firmenschuzes nebst bei- tragen zur grundrentenlehre. x., 286 p. 8°. Tubingen, H. Laupp, 1867. Contains : Das autorrecht als kunstUche sicherung der lohn- und der lohnrentenfunction, p. 102-330. Dcrschuz von schriftwerken, musikalien und kunstwerken im posi- tiven rechte und in der juristischen doctrin Deutschlands, p. 321-238, Der artistische autorschuz Insbesondere, p. 239-258. I^oie. — Originally published in " Zeitschrift fur die ge- sammte staatswissenschaft." ScHELLWiTZ (Hartmann). Das recht des autors an seinen werken nach den grundsatzen des preussischen landrechts in einer kritischen beleuchtung eines erkenntnisses des konig- lichen appellationsgerichts zu Koln, den Becker'schen nachdruck von Theodor Ker- nel's Sammtllchen werken betreifend. Dar- gestellt von H. Schellwitz. iv. p. il., 41 p. 8°. Berlin, verlag der Nicolai'schen buch- handlung, 1855. Ueber den grund, das wcsen und die gren- zen des rechtes der erzeuger an den schopf- ungen der kunst und wissenschaft. In " Deutsche vierteljahrs schrift." istes heft, 1839. 8°. Stuttgart & Tiibingen, nr. 5, p. 252-281. SCHENK (Johann). Der franzosische gesetzent- wurf zum schutze des literarischen und artis- tischen eigenthums. (Publicirt am 13. April 1863.) 38 p. 8°. Wien, F. Manz & comp., 1863. SCHLETTER (Hermann Theodor). Handbuch der deutschen press-gesetzgebung. Samm- lung der gesetzlichen bestimmungen iiber das literarische eigenthum und die presse in alien deutschen bundesstaaten, nebst ge- schichtliche einleitung. xxxii., 352 p. 8°. Leipzig, E. F. Steinacker, 1846. Contents: Sammlung der gesetzlichen bestimmungen iiber literarisches eigenthum, p. 1-141. Sammlung der gesetzlichen bestimmungen iiber press-recht, p. 143-345. ScHLiCKEYSEN (C.) Die anerkennung des geistigen eigenthums, eine soziale frage. About 25 p. 8°. Berlin, Berggold, 1871. SCHMID (Karl Ernst). Der biichernachdruck aus dem gesichtspunkte des rechts, der moral und politik : Gegen dr. Ludvvig Friedrich Griesinger. Der hohen deutschen bundes- versammlung verehrungsvoU zugeeignet. 168 p. 12°. Jena, F. Frommann, 1823. ScHNAASE (Karl ?) Ueber das kunstlerische eigenthum. Aus den Annalen fiir die rechts- pflege und verwaltung. 8°. Trier, 1843. ScHOLZ (Christian). Actentnassige darstellung meiner gerichtlichen verfolgung durch die literarische anstalt zu Frankfurt a. M. wegen angeblichen nachdrucks des Struwelpeter durch Ubersetzung desselben in das Schwe- dische, Hollandische und Englische. Meine freisprechung in erster und meine verurtheil- ung in zweiter instanz. Beitrag zur lehre vom nachdruck. Nebst bemerkungen iiber die deutschen vertrage mit England und Frankreich wegen gegenseitigen schutzes filr literarische und artistische erzeugnisse, sowie liber die ungUltigkeit solcher durch Preussen Oder andere staaten des ZoUvereins abge- diesem gegeniiber. Darmstadt, Leske, ■ Neue folge. Leipzig, 7tes 8tes heft, 15. schlossenen vertrage About vi., 105 p. 8° 1852. ScHRECK (August Hermann). Die deutsche reichsgesetzgebung Uber den schutz des geistigen eigenthums. In " Unsere zeit. Deutsche revue der gegenwart." I3ter jahrgang. istehalfte. 8°. heft, I. April 1877, p. 511-527 ; April 1877, p. 621-634. ScHROTER (L.) Das eigenthum im allgemeinen und das geistlge eigenthum insbesondere fiir gelehrte undlaien natur-und rechtsgeschi'cht- lich dargeslellt. viii p., i 1. 62 p. 8°, Bres- lau, G. P. Aderholz, 1840. SchUrmann (August). Der rechtsschutz gegen iibersetzungen in den internationalen vertra- gen zum schutze des literarischen urheber- rechts. Vora standpuncte des literarischen verkehrs. v., 42 p. 8°. Leipzig, selbstverlag des verfassers, [druck von C, P. Melzer], i860. Schutz der autoren gegen iibersetzung. 1855. See Wachter (Oscar). Scott (Leonard). Piratical publishers. In " The Popular science monthly." v. 22. 8°. New York, no. 5, March, 1883, p. 656-659. Scribner's monthly. (The Century magazine.) 25 v. 8°. New York, 1870-83. Contains .■ v. 3, 1872. International copyright, edito- rial, p. 375-376. — V. 10, 1875. International copyright, editorial, p. 378-379. — v. 11, 1875. Foreign dramatists under American laws. By Eaton S. Drone, p. 30-97 ; also Appendix, p. 136 : American authorship, editorial, p. 280-281. — V. 14, 1877. Dr. Appleton on copyright, edi- torial, p. 108-109. — V. 16, 1878. Points in the copyright discussion. By J. Brander Matthews, p. 897-899. — v. 17, 1879. Drone on copyright, p. gn. — v. 20, 1880, Congress and international copyright. By Eugene L. Didier, p. 132-138: International copyright, editorial, p. 146-147. — V. 32, 18S1. Copyright at home and abroad, editorial p. 144-145. — V. 33 " The Century magazine," 1882. The copyright negotiations. [By Arthur G: Sedgwick], p. 667-671 : Authors' rights,_editorial, _p. 779 : Two letters on the international copyright question : i. Harriet Mar- tineau, Tynemouth, Dec. 24, 1843, p. 781-782 : ii. P. A. Towne, New York, Jjan. 12, 1882, p. 782 : The blessings of piracy. [By E: Eggleston], p. 942-945. ScRUTTON (T: E:) The laws of copyright. An examination of the principles which should regulate literary and artistic property in Eng- land and other countries. Being the Yorke prize essay of the University of Cambridge for the year 1882, revised and enlarged. About xix., 335 p, 8°, London, J; Murray, 1883, Sedgwick (Arthur G:) The copyright nego- tiations. In "The Century magazine." [Scribner's monthly.] v. 23. 8°. New York, no. 5, March 1882, p. 667-671. [International copyright. Anon.'] In " The Atlantic monthly." v. 29. 8°. Boston, no. 173, March 1872, p. 387-388. International copyright by judicial deci- sion. In " The Atlantic monthly." v. 43. 8°. Boston, no. 256, Feb. 1879, p. 217-230. See also Drone (Eaton Sylvester). . Seidenstukker (Johann Heinrich Philipp). 1st der staat, nach reinen grundsatzen des ge- 44 LITERARY PROPERTY. sellschaftlichen vertrags und nach den ge- meinen grundsatzen des biirgerlichen rechts befugt, den bilchernachdruck zu verbieten, Oder nicht ? Gegen den freiherrn von Knig- ge. 8°. Helmstadt, Fleckeisen, 1792. Select foreign cases. Copyright. In " The Law magazine and review." 4th series, v. 2. 8° London, no. 244, May 1877, p. 381- 387.- Seufpert (Lothar). Das Autorrecht an litera- rischen erzeugnissen. 44 p. 8°. Berlin, E. G. LUderitz'sche verlagsbuchhandlung, 1873. [Sammlung geraeinverstandlicher wissen- schaftlicher vortrage, herausgegeben von Rud. Virchow und Fr. v. Holtzendorff. 8. serie, heft 186.] Shaler (Nathaniel Southgate). Thoughts on the nature of intellectual property and its importance to the state, i p. 1. 16 p. 8°. Cambridge, Welch, Bigelow & Co., 1877. Contends : Thoughts on the advantages of patent and copyright laws to the state. The nature of intellectual property. Same, iv., 75 p. 8°. Boston, J. R. Os- good & CO., 1878. Contents : Considerations on the nature of intellectual property, p. 1-16. Effect of invention on national cul- ture, p. 17-31. American communism, p. 33-44. Does the fostering of inventiveness profit a state?, p. 45-57. International property in patents and copyrights, p. 59- 75- Sheard (H.) Brief statement on assumed foreign copyright. 8°. London, 1851. Shepherd (H: J:) The law of copyright. A bill to amend the law relating to copyright. [Signed S., Anon.'] In " The Law magazine." V. ig. 8°. London, May 1838, p. 365-378. See also Wheaton (H:) and Donaldson (Robert) vs. Peters (R;) and Gugg (J:) Shoard (J:) A handy-book of the law of copy- right. 1863. See Chappell (F: Patey) and Shoard. Short (A) view of literary property. [Anon.] In Millar (Andrew) vs. Taylor (Robert). Speeches or arguments of the judges of the court of king's bench, April 1769. 8°. Leith, for W. Coke, 1771, p. 113-128. Shortt (J:) The law relating to works of literature and art; embracing the law of copyright, the law relating to newspapers, the law relating to contracts between authors, publishers, printers, &c., and the law of libel. With the statutes relating thereto, forms of agreements between authors, publishers, &c., and forms of pleadings, xxii., 780 p. 8°. London, H. Cox, 1871. Review by James Appleton Morgan. In "The Fo- rum." V. 3. 8°. New York, no. 5, Jan. 1875, p. 35-51. Anon. wo/rViT i« " The Journal of jurisprudence. ' 1871. V, 15. 8". Edinburgh, no. 178, Oct. 1871, p. 517, Anon, notice in "The Solicitors' journal and re- porter." V. 15. 8°. London, no. 43, Aug. a6, 1871:, p. 787. SIMMS (W: Gilmore). International copyright. [Anon.] In "The Southern quarterly re- view." V. 4. 8°. Charleston, no. 7, July 1843, p. 1-46. International copyright law. Views in re- gard to an extension of the privileges of copyright in the United States, to the citizens of other countries, in a letter to the hon. Isaac E. Holmes, of S. C, Member of Congress. In " The Southern literary messenger." v. 10. 8°. Richmond, 1844, no. i, January, p. 7-17 ; no. 3, March, p. 137-151; no, 6, June, p. 340-349 : no. 8, August, p. 449-469. See also Campbell (J :). — Dabney (J : Blair). — Mathews (Cornelius). Simon (Jules). See De la propri6t6 intellectu- elle. 1859. Socifixfi d'feconomie politique de Paris. Compte rendu du Congrfes de la proprifetS littferaire et artistique. Discussion sur la nature de cette propri6t6. In "Journal des feconomistes." ze s6rie. v. 20. 8°. Paris, 1858, p. 134-153, p. 284-313, p. 442-470. Same : Discussion de la Socifitfe d'fecono- mie politique de Paris sur la question de la propri6t6 litteraire et artistique. In " Compte rendu des travaux du Congr6s_,de lapropri6t6 litteraire et artistique, par Edouard Rotn- berg." V. 2. 8°. Bruxelles & Leipzig, E. Flatau, 1859, p. 261-311. Soci^Tfi de legislation comparfee. See Annu- aire de legislation etrangdre. Soci£t£ des gens de lettres. Proposition de loi sur la propri6t6 intellectuelle, par le comit6 de la Soci6t6 des gens de lettres. About 24 p. 8°. Paris, Bri6r6, i86i. La propriety litteraire et les traitfes inter- nationaux. Lettre h m. le ministre des af- faires etrangferes au comitfe de la Soci6t6 des gens de lettres et rfeponse du comit6 a m. le ministre des affaires etrangferes. About 7 p. 8°. Paris, Soci6t6 des gens de lettres, 1879. Socifixfi pour la defense de la propri6t6 litte- raire et artistique. See Association pour la defense de la propriSte littferaire. Society for obtaining an adjustment of the law of copyright. [Prospectus.] About 4 p. 8°. London, 185 1. Society of arts. London. Artistic copyright. [A report prepared at the request of a com- mittee of the society, by Delabere Rober- ton Blaine.] /» " The Athenaeum." 1858. Part I. 4°. London, no. 1580, Feb. 6, 1858, p. 179-181. Same. In " The Journal of the Society of arts." V. 6. sm. 4°. London, no. 279, March 26, 1858, p. 293-301. Same. /»" The Jurist." New series, v. 4, part 2. 8°. London, no. 163, Feb. 20, 1858, p. 86-90. Artistic copyright. Reasons ip favour of a bill to establish artistic copyright, prepared by the council of the Society of arts. fol. London, 1861. Report of the artistic copyright committee. [With protest by D. R. Blaine upon the decis- ion as to the registration of works of art.] In "The Athenaeum." 1858, part I. 4°. Lon- don, no. 1587, March 27, 1858, p. 401-403. LITERARY PROPERTY. 45 Same. In "The Jurist." New series, v. 4, part 2. 8°. London, no. 170, April 10, 1858, p. 168-170. See also Journal (The) of the Society of arts. Some remarks on the law of copyright. [Anon.'] About 15 p. 8°. [London, 1848?] Anon, notice in "The Jurist." v. 12, part 2, 8°. London, no. 597, June 17, 1648, p. 240-241. Some thoughts on the state of literary property, humbly submitted to the consideration of the public. [Anon.'] S°. London, Don^dson, 1764. Southern (The) literary messenger. 8°. Rich- mond, 1837-44. Contains: v. 3, 1837. Rights of authors. \Anon.']^ !'■ 37~39. — V. S, 1839. International law of copy-right. AnonAt p. 663-666. — v. 6, 1840. Rights of authors. Signed H. G.], p. 69-^2. — v. 10, 1844. International " copyright law. By W: Gilmore Simms, p. 7-i7; 137-151, 340-349, 449-469 : Cheap literature. [Signed E. D.] .-,.,-,,.,,,,, - -. [Signed E. D.l, p. 33-39: Reply to E. B. and Mr. Simms. [Signed!. B. D., i.e. J: Blair Dabney] , p. 193-199, 289-296: E. D. to J. B. D., \i.e. J: Blair Dabney], p. 415-422. SouTHEY (Robert). Inquiry into the copyright act. [Anan.l In " The Quarterly review." V. 21. 8°. London, no. 41, Jan., 1819, p. 196-213. Same : Copyright. Extract from the cri- tique on the copyright question. In Brydges (Sir S: Egerton). The anti-critic. 8°. Geneva, W. Fick, 1822, p. 132-133. Southey, ttttti ^""^ Wordsworth on the copyright question. [Two letters and a poem.] In " The Athenaeum." 4°. London, no. 549, May 5, 1838, p. 323-324. Spalding (Hugh Mortimer). The law of copy- right. With practical forms and notes. Brevier ed. 2 p. 1. 17-114 p. 24°. Philadel- phia, P. W. Ziegler & CO., [1878.] (Handy law series.) Speeches or arguments of the judges of the court of king's bench, 1771. See Millar (An- drew) vs. Taylor (Robert). Spencer (Herbert). Herbert Spencer before the English copyright commission. [Ques- tions and answers.] In "The Popular science monthly." v. 14. 8°. New York, no. 81, Jan. 1879, p. 296-303 ; no. 82, Feb. 1879, P- 440-460. [Letters on the Law amendment society's copyright bill.] In " The Publishers' circu- lar. V. 44. 8°. London, no. 1046, April 16, i88i, p. 301-303. Same. In "The Publishers' weekly." V. 19. 8°. New York, no. 486, May 7, 1881, p. 512-513. SpennAti {Cav. — ) Consultazione suUa pro- priety letteraria del Discorsi del sommo pon- tefice Pio IX., pronunziati in Vaticano, rac- colti e pubblicati dal padre don Pasquale de Franciscis. About 24 p. 16°. Napoli, tip. di Luica di Tomaso, 1874. Spofford (Ainsworth Rand). Copyright in its relations to libraries and literature. In " The Library journal." v. i. 4". New York, nos. 2-3, Nov. 30, 1876, p. 84-89. The history of international copyright in congress. [Anon.'] /»" The Round table. " V. 3. fol. New York, no. 28, March 17, 1866, p. 161-162 ; no. 29, March 24, 1866, p. 178-179. See also The Publishers' weekly. Spondlin (R.) Ueber das wesen des verlags- rechts und dessen verletzung durch den Nachdruck mit rilcksicht auf das deutsche, franzosische und schweizerische recht. Inau- gural-dissertation zur erlangung der juristi- schen doctorwiirde. Der hohen staatswissen- schaftl. facultat der universitat Zurich vorge- legt. 2 p. 1. 81 p. 1 1. 8°. Ziirich, F. Schulthess, 1867. Stedman (Edmund Clarence). See Copyright (The) association. — The Publisher's weekly. Steiger (E.) Der nachdruck in Nord-Araerika. Mein wirken als deutscher buchhandler. Zwei aufsatze von E. Steiger. Als manu- script gedruckt. About 119 p. 16°. New York, 1867. Steinitz (Heinrich). Die neuen deutschen reichsgesetze, betreffend das urheberrecht an werken der bildenden kunste, den schutz der photographieen gegen unbefugte nachbil- dung, und das urheberrecht an mustern und modellen. About 112 p. 8°. Berlin, Hem- pel, 1876. Stephen (Sir James). Digest of the law of copyright. In Great Britain. Royal commis- sion on copyright. Report, fol. London, G. E. Eyre & W. Spottiswoode, 1878, p. Ixi-xc. Stevens (H:) The universal postal union and international copy-right. [A paper read be- fore the Library association at Oxford, Oct. 3d, 1878.] In Library (The) association of the United Kingdom. The transactions of the first annual meeting. 1878. 4°. Oxford, p. 108-120. Stoupe (J. G. Antoine). Reflexions sur les contrefa9ons en librairie, suivies d'un zak- moire sur ler6tablissementdela communaut6 des imprimeurs de Paris. 8°. Paris, Stoupe, [1804.] Same: M6moire sur le rfetablisseraent de la communautS des imprimeurs de Paris, suivi de Reflexions sur les contrefa9ons en librairie, et sur le stferfeotypage. About 39 p. 12°. Paris, les marchands de nouveautfes, 1806. Stubenrauch (Moritz, edler von). Entwurf eines gesetzes zum schutze der autor-rechte an werken der literatur und kunst. Projet d'une loi garantissant les droits des auteurs aux oeuvres de littferature et d'art. /»Compte rendu des travaux du congrfes artistique d'An- vers par Eugfene Gressin Dumoulin. 8°. Anvers & Leipzic, M. Kornicker, 1862, p. 339-364. Die neuesten bestrebungen zum schutz des urheberrechtes an erzeugnissen der kunst. 8°. Wien, 1862, 46 LITERARY PROPERTY. Stylus, pseud. American publishers and Eng- lish authors. By Stylus. 23 p. 8°. Balti- more, E. L. Didier, 1879. Notice in " The Publishers' weekly." y. 15. 8". New York, no. 370, Feb. 15, 1879, p. 196-197. Summary of evidence on the copyright amend- ment bill. 8 p. 8°. [London, Barnard & Farley, 1818?] Sumner (C:) [International copyright. Letter on this subject, February 17, 1868.] In The Copyright association for the protection and advancement of literature and art. Interna- tional copyright. 8°. New York, 1868, p. 15-16- Same. In his Works, v. 12. 8°. Boston, Lee & Shepard, 1877, p. 270-271. Sweden. See Annuaire de legislation 6tran- gfere. 1877. Synopsis taken from the record of testimony of Dana. See Lawrence (W: Beach) vs. Dana (R: Yi:,jr.)et als. Talfourd (Sir T: Noon). A speech delivered in the house of commons, on Thursday the i8th of May 1837, on moving for leave 10 bring in a bill to consolidate the law relating to copyright, and to extend the term of its duration. 8°. London, E. Moxon, 1837. Same. In his Critical and miscellaneous writings. 2d American ed. 8°. Philadel- phia, Carey & Hart, 1846, p. 159-164. Same: Amendment of the law of copy- right. [An abridgement ot his speech.] In "The Legal observer." v. 14. 8°. Lon- don, Richards & co., 1837, p. 65-68. Anon, notice in " The Athenaeum." 4*. London, no. 501, June 3, 1837, p. 402. Anon, review [by T: Watts?"] In "The Mechanics' magazine." v. 27. 8". London, no. 725, July i, 1837, Anon, review : The copy-right law, in " The Monthly review." v. i, new series. 8". London, no. i, Jan. 1838, p. 52-61. A speech delivered in the house of com- mons on Wednesday, 25th April 1838, on moving the second reading of the bill to amend the law of copyright. About 22 p. 8°. London, E. Moxon, 1838. Same. In his Critical and miscellaneous writings. 2d American ed. 8° Philadel- phia, Carey & Hart, 1846, p. 165-171. Sergeant Talfourd's speech on the copy- right question, delivered in the house of com- mons, February 28, 1839. To which is added Mr. Tegg's Letter to the 'Times,' on the copyright monopoly. 8°. London, Foster & Hextall, 1839. Anon. «.3/«« £»" The Eclectic review." New series, V. 5. 8". London, April 1839, p. ^z'r^VI' Same. In his Critical and miscellaneous writings. 2d American ed. 8° Philadel- phia, Carey & Hart, 1846, p. 171-176. Three speeches delivered in the house of commons in favour of a measure for an ex- tension of copyright. To which are added, the petitions in favour of the bill, and re- marks on the present state of the copyright question, xxxi., 148 p. 16°. London, E. Moxon, 1840. A nan. notice in " The monthly magazine : edited by J: A. Heraud." v. 3. 8°. London, no. 15, March 1840, p. 325-327. Review by T: Hood in "The works of T. Hood. Edited by his son." v. 5. 12°. London, E. Moxon & CO., 1862, p. 363-365. Same : Trois discours prononc6s au parle- ment d'angleterre par Sir T. Noon Talfourd ; traduits de I'anglais par Paul Laboulaye. In "fitudes sur la proprifeife littferaire en France et en Angleterre, par £douard Laboulaye." 8°. Paris, A. Durand, J858, p. 83-151. Serjeant Talfourd's copyright bilk In " The Jurist." 8° London, no. 19, May 20, 1837, p. 321-323: " Th« Legal observer." 8°. London, v. 14, 1837, p. 125-126 ; v. 15, 1838, p. 449-451 : " The Monthly magazine, edited by J: A. Heraud." v. i. 8°. London, no. 5, May, 1839, p. 583-584- Speech for the defendant in the prosecu- tion of the Queen v. Moxon, for the publica- tion of Shelley's works. 8°. London, 1841. Tallichet (fidouard). La propriety littSraire. Un congrfes de gens de lettres^ Paris. In " Bibliothfeque universelleet revue Suisse." v. 63. 8°. Lausanne, July 1878, p. iio-t28. Tarantini (Leopoldo). In difesa della pro- priety letteraria dei discorsi del sommo Pon- tefice pel rev. D. Pasquale de Franciscis, contro il sig. Girolamo Milone. About 34 p., 2 tab. 8°. [Napoli, 1876.] Tardieu (Jules Romain). De la perp6tuit6 en matifere de littSrature et d'art. Lettre a I'Academie imp6riale des sciences, belles- lettres et arts de Rouen ; par J. T. de Saint Germain [fseud.'] About 16 p. 8° Paris, J. Tardieu, 1858. See also Curmer (Henri LSon). Tegg (T:) Remarks on the speech of sergeant Talfourd, on moving for leave to bring in a bill to consolidate the laws relating to copy- right, and to extend the term of its duration. About 23 p. 8°. London, Tegg & son, 1837. A non. review : The copy-right law. In '* The Monthly review." v. i, new series. 8". London, no. i, Jan. 1838, p. 52-63. Same: Produce of copy-right. Extract from letter of Mr. Tegg, in answer to ser- geant Talfourd's copyright bill. In " The American almanac." 1840. 12°. Boston, D. H. Williams, p. 100-102. T£nint (Wilhelm). De la proprifetfe littferaire. In "La France littferaire." Nouv. sferie. v. 4. 8°. Paris, 7 mars 1841, p. 249-256. Terhune (Mary Virginia). 5«The Publishers' weekly. Thomas (ifimile). Contrefaqon. In Coquelin (Charles) and Guillaumin (Urbain Gilbert). Dictionnaire de I'feconomie politique. 3' 6d. V. I. 8°. Paris, Guillaumin & cie., 1864, p. 477-479- Thomas (J; Penford). A legal and constitu- tional argument against the alleged judicial right of restraining the publication of reports LITERARY PROPERTY. 47 of judicial proceedings, as assumed in the King V. Thistlewood and others, enforced against the proprietor of the Observer by a fine of £500, and afterwards confirmed by the court of King's bench. 2 p. 1. 148 p. 8°. London, I. L. Turner, for S. Sweet, 1822. Thomas (Moy). See Appleton (C: E: Cutts Birchall). — Great Britain. Royal commission on copyright. Report. 1878. — Harper & Brothers. Thompson (G: Carslake). Remarks on the law of literary property in different countries, and the principles on which it is founded. 31 p. 8°. London, The National press agency, 1883. Thornton (W. W.) The universal cyclopaedia of law. 8°. Northport, N. Y., E: Thomp- son, [1883.] Contains ; Copyright, p. 230-238. Thulliez (Louis), fitude legislative, historique et juridique sur la propriety littferaire. 306 p. 8°. Paris, E. Thorin, 1876. TiCKNOR (G:) International copyright. In "Life, letters, and journals of G: Ticknor." V. 2. 8°. Boston, J. R. Osgood & co., 1876, p. 27S-280. Titles of newspapers and books. \Anon. From the Solicitors' journal.] In " The Cen- tral law journal." v. 10. 8'. St. Louis, 1880, no. 5, Jan. 30, p. 82-84; no. 6, Feb. 6, p. 104-106 ; no. 7, Feb. 13, p. 123-126. TOMLINS (Sir T: Edlyne). Literary property. See Jacob (Giles). ToMMASEO (Nicol6). Lettera di N. Tommaseo di Librai Italiani sulla propriety letteraria. 8°. Venezia, 1839. ToscANi (Odoardo). Studio sulla propriety let- teraria ed artistica. About 147 p. 8°. Roma, 1881. Tourg6e (Albion Winegar). The law of copy- right. In "Our Continent." v. i. fol. Philadelphia, no. 7, March 29, 1882, p. 104. Tournachon-NadAR (F61ix) contre Tournachon (Adrien, jeune) & cie. 1857. See Tribune (La) judiciaire. Towne (P. A.) See Scribner's monthly. Tribune (La) judiciaire. Recueil des plaidoy- ers et des rSquisitoires les plus remarquables des tribunaux fran9ais et Strangers par J. Sabbatier. v. 5. 8°. Paris, C. Borrani, 1857. Contains: Cour impiriale de Paris. Pr^sxdence de m. ]e premier president Delaogle. Audience du 12 d^c, 1857. Revendication de la propri6t£ exclusive du pseudo- nyme Nadar. F^lix Tournachon-Nadar, contr« A. Tour- nachon jeune et cie., p. 295-323 (Plaidoirie de me Henry Celliez, p. 29S-311 : Plaidoirie de me Ernest Desmarest, p. 311-322 : Arr^t, p. 322-323). Trollope (Anthony). On the best means of extending and securing an international law of copyright. In National association for the promotion of social science. Transactions. 1866. 8°. London, Longmans, 1867, p. 119- 125 : Discussion on this paper, p. 243-244. Tromp (T. van Hettinga), De Koninklijke akademie van wetenschappen en de zooge- naamde letterkundige en kunsteigendom, 8°. Leeuwarden, 1863. TucKERMAN (H: Theodore). Violations of lit- erary property. The Federalist. — Life and character of John Jay. In " The Continental monthly." v. 6. 8°. New York, no. 3, Sept. 1864, p. 336-355. TuRCHiARULO (A.) La proprieti letteraria. 8°. Napoli, 1857. Turner (Sharon). Reasons for a modification of the act of Anne respecting the delivery of books, and copyright. [Anon.] ip. 1.6op. 8°. London, Nichols, son, & Bentley, 1813. To the chairman of the committee upon the copyright laws. 16 p. 8°. [London, Barnard & Farley, 1818.] Turner (T;) On copyright in design in art and manufactures. With addenda [of statutes in force and rules of registrar of designs.] viii., 124 p. 8°. London, F. Elsworth, 1851. Tyler (Moses Coit). See The Publishers' weekly. Tyndall (J:) Professor Tyndall before the English copyright commission. [Questions and answers.] In " The Popular science monthly." v. 14. 8°. New York, no. 79, Nov. 1878, p. 39-44. Underdown (Emanuel Maguire). The law of art copyright. The engraving, sculpture and designs acts, the international copyright act, and the art copyright act, 1862. With an in- troduction and notes. Also an appendix, containing the evidence communicated to the Society of arts on piracy of works of art, and forms for the use of artists, etc. 2 p. 1. 211 p. 12°. London, J. Crockford, 1863. Anon, notice in "The Art journal." New series v. 2. 4**. London, April 1, 1863, p. 84. Anon, review in "The Athenseum." 4*. London, no. 1852, April 25, 1863, p. 549-550 : Note from P. Le Neve Foster, no. 1853, May 2, 18G3, p. 587. Underhill (Arthur). A summary of the law of torts, or wrongs independent of contract. 12°. London, Butterworths, 1873. Contains : Infringement of copyright, p. 173-180. Same .■ Principles of the law of torts. 1st American from the 2d English ed., by A. Un- derhill, assisted by Claude C: M. Plumptre. With American cases, by Nathaniel C. Moak. 8°. Albany, W: Gould & son, 1881. Contains; Infringement of copyright. [Prepared by J:T. Cook], p. 666-689. United States. Acts passed by the United States Congress relating to copyright. In " The Statutes at large." v. 1-22. 8°. Bos- ton & Washington, 1845-83. Summary : An act for the encouragement of learning by securing the copies of maps, charts, and books, to the authors and proprietors of such copies, during the times therein mentioned, [ist congress, 2d session, chapter 15, May 31, 17^0], V. I, p. 124-126. An act supplementary to an act, intituled "An act for the encouragement of learn- ing [1790], and extending the benefits thereof to the arts of designing, engraving, and etching historical and other prints. [7th cong., 1st sess., chap. 36, April 29, X802I, v. 2, p. 171-172, An act to continue a copyright to J; Kow- lett. [aoth cong., zst sess., chap, 145, May 24, 1828]^ v. 6, p. 389, An act to amend the several acts respecting 48 LITERARY PROPERTY. copyrights, [sist cong,, 2d sess., chap. i6, Feb, 3, 1831], V. 4, p. 436-439. An act to amend "An act to continue a copyright of J: Rowlett." [21st cong., ist sess., chap. 13, Feb. 11^ 1830], v, 6, p. 403. An act sup- plementary to the act [1831] to amend the several acts respecting copyrights. [23d cong., ist sess., chap. 157, June 30, 1834], V. 4, p. 728. An act supplementary to the act of 24th May, 1828, to continue a copyright to J: Rowlett. [27th cong., 3d sess., chap. 140, March 3, 1843], V. 6, p. 897. [Enactment that of coi)yrighted books one copy shall be deposited with the Smithsonian Institution and one copy in the Library of Congress, agth cong., ist sess., chap, 179, sec. 10, Aug. 10, 1846], v. g, p. 106. [Copyright deposits maybe sent free by mail. 33d cong., 2d sess., chap. 201, sec. 5, March 3, 1855], v. 10, p. 685. An act supplemental to an act entitled '' An act to amend the several acts respecting copyright," ap- proved Feb. J, 1831. [34th cong., ist sess., chap. 169, Aug. 18, 1856], V. II, p. 138-139. [Act removing copy- right deposits from the Department of State to the De- partment of the Interior. 35th cong,, 2d sess., chap. 22, sec. 8, Feb. 5, 1859, v. 11, p. 380-381. An act to extend the right of appeal from decisions of circuit courts to the Supreme court of the United States [in copyright cases, 36th cong,, 2d sess., chap. 37, Feb. 18, i86r], v. 12, p. 130-131. An act supplemental to an act entitled "An act to amend the several acts respecting copyright," ap- proved Feb. 3, T831, and to the acts in addition thereto and amendment thereof. [38th cong., 2d sess., chap. X26, March 3, 1865], v. 13, p. 540-541- An act amendatory of the several acts respecting copyrights. [39th cong., 2d sess., chap. -43, Feb. 18, 1867], v. 14, p. 395. An act to revise, consolidate, and amend the statutes relating to patents and copyrights. [41st cong., 2d sess., chap. 230, (sec. 86 to no concerning copyrights), July 8, 1870, v. 16, p. 108-217. An act to amend the law relating to patents, trade-marks and copyrights. [43d cong., ist sess., chap. 301, June 18, 1874], V. iS, p. 78-79. An act for the relief of W: Tod Helmuth, of New York. [Authorizing him to enter for copyright a corrected title of " A system of sur- gery, by William Tod Helmuth," and to deposit two copies of the book with the Librarian of Congress, in lieu of an imperfect title entered in 1872. 43d cong., ist sess., chap. 534, June 23, 1874], v. 18, p. 618. [Act forbidding the transmission through the mails of any publication which violates any copyright granted by the United States. 45th cong., 3d sess., chap. 180, sec. 15, March 3, 1879], V. zo, p. 3sg. An act to amend the statutes in relation to copyright. [Relating to the position of claim of copy- right upon designs. 47th cong,, ist sess., chap, 366, Aug. I, 1882], V. 22, p. 181. Acts in force as to the jurisdiction of copyright cases. In " The Revised Statutes of the United States." 2d ed. 8^ Wash- ington, Government printing office, 1878. Summary : Circuit courts, acts of 8 July, 1870 and 16 Feb., 1875, sec. 692, clause 9, p. iii. Supreme court, act 8 July, 1870, sec. 699, clause i, p. 130. Jurisdiction of United States courts exclusive of the courts of the sev- eral states, act 8 July, 1870, sec. 711, clause 5, p. 135. Procedure, act 8 July, 1870, sec. 972, p. 183. Copyrights. [The laws now in force]. In *' The Revised Statutes of the United States." 2d ed. 8° Washington, Government print- ing office, 1878, title Ix., chap. 3, p. 957-960. The copyright laws of the United States, as revised, consolidated, and amended by act of congress approved July 8th, 1870. 8 p. 8°. Washington, Government printing office, 1870. Directions fof securing copyrights under the revised act of congress which took effect August I, 1874. 4 p. 8^ [Washington, Library of Congress, 1874.] Note. — Furnished, upon application, by the Librarian of Congress, Washington, D. C. The law of copyright in the United States. In force August i, 1874. From the Revised Statutes of the United States, in force De- cember 1, 1873, as amended by act approved June 18, 1874. 4 p.*8°. [Washington, Li- brary of Congress, 1874.] Note. — Supplied, upon application, by the Librarian of Congress, Washington, D. C. The law of patents and copyrights, as re- vised, simpliiied, arranged, and consolidated, by the commission appointed for that pur- pose, from the various acts of congress now in force, in whole or in part. 24 p, 8°. Wash- ington. Government printing office, 1868. Contains : Chapter III. of copyrights, p. 20-24. The patent, trade-marli and copyright laws of the United States of America. From the Revised Statutes of the United States, with the amendments since 1874. And a full index. 48 p. 8*^, New York, Baker, Voor- his & CO., 1878. Contains: Chapter 3. Copyright, p. 38-44, Revision of the United States statutes. Title Ixiii. : Patents, trade-marks, and copy- rights. As drafted by the commissioners appointed for that purpose. Title leaf, 34 p. 4". Washington, Government printing office, 1872. Contains .' Copyrights, p. 27-33. United States Digest ; a digest of decisions of the various courts within the United States to the year 1870. By B: Vaughan Abbott. 14 V.' 8°. Boston, Little, Brown & co., 1874-76. Contains .' Gopyright, v. 3, p. 607-612. Same : New series, v. 1—9. Annual di- gest. 1870-1878. By B: V. Abbott. 8°. Boston, Little, Brown & co., 1872-79. Contains .• Copyright, v. i, 1870, p. 167-168 : v. 2, 1S71, p. 166-167 : V. 3, 1872, p. 159-160 ; V. 4, 1873, p. 182-183 '• V. 6, 187s, p. 176 : V, 7, 1876, p. 177-178 : V. 8, 1877, p. 172-173- Same : New series, v. 10. Annual di- gest, 1879. By J: E. Hudson and G: F: Williams. 8°. Boston, Little, Brown & CO., 1880. Contains : Copyright, p. 152. Same: New series, v. 11-14. Annual di- gest, 1880-1883. By G: F: Williams. 8°. Boston, Little, Brown & co., 1881-84. Contains ; Copyright, v. ii, 1880, p, 162 : v. 12, 1881, p. 164 : V. 13, 1882, p. 176-177 : V. 14, 1883, p. 165-166. University of Cambridge. England. Further statement ordered by the syndics of the Uni- versity of Cambridge to be printed and cir- culated. 8°. Cambridge, 1818. Same : In " A vindication of the right of the universities of the United Kingdom to a copy of every new publication. By E; Chris- tian." 3d ed. 8°. Cambridge, J. Smith, 1818, p. 1S9-193. Note.— Tor a reply see Brydges (Sir S: Egerton). An- swer to the Further statement by the syndics of the University of Cambridge. x8i8. Observations on the copy-right bill, print- ed by order of the vice-chancellor, heads of colleges, &c. of the University of Cambridge. 8°. Cambridge, 1818. Same . In " A vindication of the right of the universities of the United Kingdom to a copy of every new publication. By E: Chris- tian." 3d ed. 8°. Cambridge, J. Smith, 1818, p. 181-188. University (The) of Cambridge against H; LITERARY PROPERTY. Bryer. Judgment, 20th \Anon. report.] 15 p. & Preston, n. d.' November 1812. [London, Strahan Same : In " A vindication of the right of the universities of the United Kingdom to a copy of every new publication. By E: Chris- tian." 3d ed. 8°. Cambridge, J. Smith, 1818, p. 85-107. Same : In " Reports of cases argued and determined in the court of king's bench. By E; Hyde East." v. 16. 8°. London, A. Strahan for J. Butterworth & son, 1814, p. 317-334- Same : In " Reports of cases in the court of king's bench. By E: Hyde East." v. 16. New ed., by T: Day. 8°. Philadelphia, M. Carey & son, 1817, p. 315-333. Unpartheyisches bedenken, worin aus alien natiirlichen, gOttlichen und menschlichen, civil- und criminalrechten und gesetzen klar und deutlich ausgefiihret und bewiesen wird, dass der unbefugte nachdruck privilegirter und unprivilegirter biicher ein grob- und schandliches, alien gottlich- und menschlichen rechten und gesetzen zuwiderlaufendes ver- brechen, und infamer diebstahl sey. 8° Coin, 1742. I/ote, — According to Weller (Emil) Die falschen und fingirten druckorte, v. i, Leipzig, 1864, it was printed by Piittner in Hof. Unreciprocated copyright. [Anon.] In " The New monthly magazine and humorist. Ed- ited by W. Harrison Ainsworth." v. 93. 8°. London, no. 369, Sept. 1851, p. 122-126. Urheberrecht und nachdruck. In " Die Grenzboten. Zeitschrlft fur politik und lit- eratur." 20. Jahrgang, i. semester, i. band. 8°. Leipzig, 1861, p. 52-63 ? Vatimesnil ( — de). Opinion de m. de Vati- mesnil, sur TeflFet des prorogations accordefes par le projet, quant aux privileges dont I'au- teur ou ses hSritiers auraient trait6 avec un tiers. In France. Commission de la ptofriitl littlraire. Collection des precfes-verbaux. 4°. Paris. Pillet aln6, 1826, p. 305-307. Veit (Moritz). Die erweiterung des schutzes geg«n nachdruck zu gunsten der erben ver- dienter autoren. 8°, Leipzig, Veit & co., 1855. Velden(M. B. J. van den). Over het kopij- regt in Nederland. 8°. 's Gravenhage, S. de Visser, 1835. VERGfi (Charles Henri). See Lacan (Adolphe Jean Baptiste)a»(f Paulmier (Charles Pierre Paul). — Pataille (Henri Jules Simon) and Huguet (Auguste). — Rendu (Ambroise). Vermeire (P.) Le libre travail, ou abolition des brevets, droits d'auteur, garantie de des- sins, remplacfe par un systfeme plus efBcace et plus naturel, suivi d'une critique par Ch. Le Hardy de Beaulieu et P. Paillotet. 8°. Bruxelles, A. Decq, 1864. Vernet (Jean fimile Horace). Du droit des peintres et des sculpteurs surleurs ouvrages. In " La France littferaire." Nouvelle sferie, V. 4. 8°. Paris, 7 mars 1841, p, 257-268. Verplanck (Gulian Crommelin). The law of literary property. In " Discourses and ad- dresses on subjects of American history, arts, and literature. By Gulian C. Ver- planck." 12°. New York, J. & J. Harper, 1833, p. 215-227. Vertheidigung des eigenthuras gegen den raub Oder priifung der schrift : Wider und fur den biichernachdruck, aus den papieren des blauen mannes. \Anon!\ About 70 p. 8°. Schwaben, 1790. Vesque von Putthngen (Johann, freiherr). Das muslcalische autorrecht. Eine juristisch- musicalische abhandlung. Mit unterstiitz- ung durch die Kaiserliche Academie des wissenschaften. x., 205 p. 8°. Wien, W: Braumiiller, 1864. Oesterreichs gesetzgebung ilber literar- isches und artistisches eigenthum. In " CEster- reichische zeitscrift fiir rechts- und staats- wissenschaft." 23. Jahrgang. 8°. Wien, 1847, p. i)2-seg. ViETOR Q. Fresemann). Eene bijdrage tot het leerstuk van den intellectueelen eigendom. About 106 p. 8°. Utrecht, J. L. Beijers, 1868. Het auteursrecht. Kantteekeningen op het ontwerp van wet tot regeling van het auteursrecht. 66 p. 8°. Utrecht, J. L. Beijers, 1877. ViGNY {Le comte Alfred de). De mademoiselle S6daine et de la propri6t6 littferaire. Lettre a, messieurs les d6put6s. In " Revue des deuxmondes." v. 25, 4feme s6rie. 8°. Paris, 15 Jan. 1841, p. 220-252. ViLLEFORT (Alfred). De la propri6t6 littSraire et artistique au point de vue international. Aper9u sur les legislations fetrangferes et sur les trait6s relatifs i la repression delacontre- fafon, suivi d'un appendice contenant : 1° le texte des conventions diplomatiques con- clues ; par la France avec la Grand e-Bre- tagne, la Sardaigne, le Portugal et le Han- ovre ; par la Grande-Bretagne avec la Prusse et la Hanovre : 2° le texte en franjais de la loi portugaise sur la propriete litteraire. 2 p. 1.,I03 p. 8°. Paris, Cosse, 1851. Villemain ( — ) Projet deloi sur les droits de propriety litteraire et artistique, presente par m. Villemain, vote par articles et rejete au vote final par la chambre des deputes en 1841. In " Legislation de la propriete litteraire et artistique, par Jules Delalain." 8°. Paris, 1862, p. 102-108. Vincent (C: E: Howard). The law of criticism and libel. A handbook for journalists, au- thors, and the libelled. 58 p. i5°. London, E. Wilson, 1876. Vindication (A) of the exclusive right of au- thors to their own works : a subject now un- der consideration before the twelve judges of England. [Anon.] About 45 p. 8°, London, 1762. ViOTTA (H. A.) Het auteursrecht van den componist. Academisch proefschrift. About so LITERARY PROPERTY. 4 p. I., 83 p. 8°. Amsterdam, L. Roothaan, 1877. Vivien (Alexandre Fran9ois Auguste). De la rSpression de la contrefason en France des ouvrages publics en Sardaigne. — Rapport de m. Vivien. In " Revue de legislation et de jurisprudence." loe annfee, nouv. s6rie. v. 20. 8°. Paris, 1844, p. 512-525. VOLKMANN (Adalbert Wilhelm). Ein wort uber die lage deutscher verleger von werken nicht deutscher urheber. [Signed V. S. anon.] In "Deutsche Vierteljahrsschrift." 2tes heft, 1846. 8°. Stuttgart & Tubingen, nr. 34, p. 196-204. Das getheilte eigenthum unter dem be- stehenden gesetze gegen nachdruck. In " Zeitschrift fiir rechtspflege und verwaltung, zunachst fiir das konigreich Sachsen." Neue folge, bd. 14. 8°. Leipzig, 1855, heft 2, nr. iv., p. 110-125. 1st der unbefugte nachdruck des recht- massigen verlegers, welcher In der ueber- schreitung der vertragsmassigen anzahl der exemplare liegt, ein betrug? In "Neue jahrbiicher fiir sachsisches strafrecht." 4. bd. 8°. Dresden & Leipzig, 1846, nr. 7, p. 117- seq. Ueber die grenzen des den geisteswerken gebiihrenden rechtsschutzes. Mit besonderer riicksicht auf das gesetz vom 22. Febr. 1844. In "Zeitschrift fur rechtspflege und verwal- tung, zunachst fUr das konigreich Sachsen." Neue folge, 6, bd. 8°. Leipzig, 1847, nr. 9, p. 262-282. Ueber die strafrechtliche seite der verletz- ungen des urheberrechts. In "Neue jahr- bucher fiir sachsisches strafrecht." 5. bd. 8°. Dresden & Leipzig, 1848, nro. 2 & 9. Die werke der kunst in den deutschen ge- setzgebungen zum schutze des urheberrechts. Mit besonderer bezugnahme auf das koniglich- sSchsische recht beleuchtet. 8°. Miinchen, 1856. Widerlegungderhauptsachlichstengriinde der vertheidiger des nachdrucks. In " AUge- meine presszeitung. Annalen der presse, der literatur und des buchhandels. Redigirt un- ter der leitung von dr. J. E. Hitzig." Jahr- gan? 1845. 8° Leipzig, 1845. Zusammenstellung der gesetzlichen be- stimmungen iiber das urheber- und verlags- recht. Aus den bundesbeschliissen den deutschen territorialgesetzgebungen und den franzosischen und englischen gesetzen in auf- trag des BSrsenvereins der deutschen buch- handler bearbeitet. xviii., 174 p. 8°. Leip- zig, E. Polz, 1855. Same : Deutsche gesetze und vortrage zum schutze des urheberrechts. Im auftrage des Borsenvereins der deutschen buchhandler, zusammengestellt von A. W. Volkmann. 2. abdruck. About 177 p. 8°. Leipzig, 1877. A nun. notice in " Journal du droit international priv6." 5me ann^e, 1878. 12°. Paris, no. 11-12, p. 659. W. The law of copyright with respect to abridgments. 1847. &< Walker (Timothy). Wachtek (Oscar), Das autorrecht nach dem gemeinen deutschen recht systematisch dar- gestellt. viii., 352 p. 8°. Stuttgart, F. Enke, 1875. A non. notice in " Journal du droit international priv^." 2me ann^e. 8**. Paris, no. 11-12, nov.-dec, 1875, p. 480. Das recht der briefe und photographien. [Anon.] In " Deutsche vierteljahrs-schrift." 26ster jahrgang, 1863. 8°. Stuttgart, 2tes heft, nr. 102, 2te abtheilung, p. 173-203. Das recht des kunstlers. [Anon.'\ In " Deutsche vierteljahrs-schrift." 22ster jahr- gang, 1859. 8°. Stuttgart, 4tes heft, p. 178- 223. Same : Das recht des kiinstlers gegen nachbildung und nachdruck seiner werke. Nach den in Deutschland geltenden rechten und den neuesten legislativen antrSgen dar- gestellt. Aus der Deutschen vierteljahrs- schrift abgedrukt. About 48 p. 8°. Stutt- gart, J. G. Cotta, 1859. Schutz der autoren gegen iibersetzung. [Anon.] In " Deutsche vierteljahrs-schrift." 1855. 8°. Stuttgart & Augsburg, 2tes heft, p. 278-327. Das urheberrecht an werken der bildenden kunste, photographien und gewerblichen mustern. Nach dem gemeinen deutschen recht systematisch dargestellt. vii., 348 p. 8°. Stuttgart, F. Enke, 1877. Das verlagsrecht mit einschluss der lehren von dem verlagsvertrag und nachdruck nach den geltenden deutschen und internationalen rechten mit besonderer riicksicht auf die ge- setzgebungen von CEsterreich, Preussen, Bayern und Sachsen systematisch dargestellt. 2 parts. I p. 1. X., 484 p. I 1. 485-920 p. 8°. Stuttgart, J. G. Cotta, 1857-58. Walker (Timothy). The law of copyright with respect to abridgments. [Anon, signed W. With appendix : Case of Story v. Holcombe, from notes by J: McLean.] In "The West- ern law journal." v. 5. 8° Cincinnati, no. 3, Dec. 1847, p. 97-108 : no. 4, Jan. 1848, p. 145-154- WalrAs (L6on). De la propriety intellectuelle position de la question economique. In "Journal des ficonomistes." 2e s6rie, v. 24. 8°. Paris, 1859, p. 392-407. * Warburton (W:, bishop of Gloucester). A letter from an author to a member of parlia- ment, concerning literary property. [Anon] About 23 p. 8°. London, Knapton, 1747. Same : In " The Works of W: Warbur- ton." A new ed. v. 12. 8°. London, for T. Cadell & W. Davies, 181 1, p. 405-416. Warner (C: Dudley). See The Publishers' weekly. Warner (Susan). See The Publishers' weekly. Washburn (P: Thacher). The law of copy- right. Laws of the United States, now in force, relating to copy-rights ; with notes and references to adjudged cases. In Blake (Alexander V.) The American bookseller's trade list." 4°. Claremont, N, H., S. Ide, 1847, p. 225-232. Waterman (T; Whitney). Of injunctions to LITERARY PROPERTY. SI restrain the infringement of copyright. In Henley (Robert Henley, 2d baron Henley). A compendium of the law and practice of in- junctions. 3d ed. 8°. New York, Banks, Gould & CO., 1852, 113 p. of vol. 2. Webster (Dr. G:) Observations on the law of copyright, in reference to the bill of mr ser- geant Talfourd, in which it is attempted to be proved that the provisions of the bill are op- posed to the principles of English law ; that authors require no additional protection ; and that such a bill would inflict a heavy blow on literature, and prove a great discourage- ment to its diffusion in this country. [Anon.} About 48 p. 8°. London, Scott, Webster & Geary, 1838. Webster (Noah). Origin of the copy-right laws in the United States. /» " A collection of papers on political, literary and moral sub- jects. By N. Webster." 8°. New York, Webster & Clark, 1843, p. 173-178. N'ote, — For an account of Mr. Webster's efforts to se- cure a copyright law see an anonymous communication from the New York Commercial advertiser, entitled ; Copyright law, in *' Niles' Weekly register," v. 40, or v. 4, 4th series. 8°, Baltimore, no. 1032, July 2, 1831, p. 319-320; and *' Noah Webster. By Horace E. Scudder." (American men of letters. Edited by C: Dudley War- ner.) 12**. Boston, Houghton, Mifflin & co., 1882, p. 52- 68. Webster (T;) On the protection of property in intellectual labour as embodied in inven- tions, books, designs, and pictures, by the amendment of the laws of patent-right and copy-right. In National association for the promotion of social science. Transactions. 1859. 8°. London, J. W. Parker & son, i860, p. 237-244. Weiske (Dr. Julius). Rechtslexikon fur juris- ten aller teutschen staaten, redigirt von dr. Jul. Weiske. 8°. Leipzig, O. Wigand, 1838- 43- Contains: Buchhandel, v. 2, 1840, p. 495-501. Eigen- thum, literarisches, artistisches, v. 4, 1S43, P' 170-196. Weisser (Friedrich). Ueber den biichernach- druck. 8°. Stuttgart, Macklot, 1820. Welcker (Carl Theodor). See Rotteck (Carl Wenzeslas Rodecker von) and Welcker. Wharton (G: MifHin). See Lieber (Francis) On international copyright. 1840. Wheaton (H:) and Donaldson (Robert) vs. Peters (R:, jr.) and Grigg (John). Report of the copy-right case of Wheaton v. Peters. Decided in the supreme court of the United States [Jan. term, 1834]. With an appendix, containing the acts of congress relating to copy-right. 176 p., i slip errata. 8°. New York, J. van Norden, 1834. Same : In " Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the supreme court of the United States. By R: Peters." v. 8. 8°. Phila- delphia, Desilver, jun., & Thomas, 1834, p. 591-699. A non. review^ signed S. [i. e. H: J : Shepherd ?] : Law of copyright in America. /«*'The Law magazine; or quarterly review of jurisprudence," v. 13. 8*. London, May, 1835, p, 331-342. „, .„ Anon, rfvtew in '* The Westminster review, v. 24, 8*. London, no, 47, Jan., 1836, p. 187-197, Whelpley (James Davenport), Ideal property. In "The Atlantic monthly." v. 22. 8°. Boston, no. 130, Aug. 1868, p. 167-173. Whipple (Edwin Percy). See The Publishers' weekly. White (R: Grant). The American view of the copyright question. By an American author. [Anon.] In "The Broadway annual." 8°. London & New York, May 1868, p. 656- 667. Same .■ The American view of the copy- right question. Reprinted from the " Broad- way magazine " [i. e, Broadway annual] May, 1868, With a postscript. 70 p. 12°. London & New York, G: Routl edge & Sons, 1880, Contents: Prefatory, _p, v,-viii. The American view of the copyright question, p, 9-29, ^ Postscript, [An account of the efforts of the Copyright association to secure copyright legislation], p. 30-62. Appendix. The right of copyright. By S. Irenaeus Prime, p. 63-68. Extract from mr. G: Haven Putnam's address on inter- national copyright. [Delivered in New York, Jan. 29, 1879], p. 69-70. . „, . , , , , Anon, review m The Athenaeum, 4®. London, no. S782, Feb. ig, 1881, p. 257-258, AnoH. notice [by Eaton Sylvester Drone] in ''New York Herald," March 28, i88i,p, 10. Editorial notice in '* The Publishers' weekly,'' v, ig, 8°, New York, no, 480, March 36, 1881, p, 333, The copyright question as it stands. In The Copyright association for the protection and advancement of literature and art. Inter- national copyright. 8°. New York, 1868, p. 35-40. Whitman (C: Sidney). Patent laws and prac- tice in the United States and foreign coun- tries ; including copy-right and trade-mark laws. xi. p. il., 708 p. 12°. Washington, W. H. & O. H. Morrison, 1871. Whitney (Adeline D. Train). .?« The Pub- lishers' weekly. Whittlesey (C:) Rights of authors outside of copyright. (Hesperian,- September, 1839.) In "Fugitive essays. By C: Whittlesey," 12°. Hudson, Ohio, Sawyer, IngersoU & co., 1852, p. 75-90. Wider und fiir den buchernachdruck aus den papieren des blauen mannes. Bey gelegen- heit der zukiinftigen wahlkapitulazion ; ged- ruckt im reich und fiir das reich. \^Anon.'\ About. 79 p. 8°. [». p.\ 1790. WiEBE (Eduard, translator). See Putnam (G: Haven). Internationaler schutz gegen den nachdruck. 1880. Wilson (Daniel). The law of copyright. Pike vs. Nicholas. In "The Canadian journal of science, literature, and history : conducted by the editing committee of the Canadian institute." New series, v. 12. 8°. Toronto, no. 71, or V. 12, no. 5, April 1870, p, 415- 429. WiNSOR (Justin). See The Publishers' weekly. Witzleben (C. D. von). Das Norddeutsche Bundes-nachdruckgesetz. In " Deutsche vierteljahrs-schrift." 33 ter jahrgang, 1870. 8°. Stuttgart, i stes heft, nr. 129, p. 98-161. Zur frage einer einheitlichen deutschen nacbdrucksgesetzgebung, Mit besonderer 52 LITERARY PROPERTY. beziehung auf die dem bundestag vorgelegten gesetzentwttrfe der osterreichischen regierung und des Borsenvereins der deutschen buch- handler. [Anon.] In "Deutsche viertel- jahrs-schrift." 26 ster jahrgang, 1863. 8°. Stuttgart, heft i, nr. loi, p. 219-292. Zur frage Uber die anwendbarkeit des gesetzlichen schutzrechts gegen nachdruck auf erzeugnisse der tagespresse. In "Zeit- schrift fUr rechlspflege und verwaltung, zunachst fiir das konigreich Sachsen." Neue- folge, band 14. 8°. Leipzig, 1855, heft i, p. 1-33- WOLOWSKI (Louis Franfois Michel Raymond). Projet de loi sur la propri6t6 littferaire en AUemagne. In " Revue de legislation et de jurisprudence." v. 2. 8°, Paris, 1835, p. WooLSEY (Theodore Dwight). See The Pub- lishers' weekly. Wordsworth (W:) See Southey (Robert). Worms (Fernand). £tude sur la proprifetfe litteraire, d6cret du ler germinal an xiii [March 22, 1805.] Avec une preface de m. E. Pouillet. Suivie du procfes des oeuvres posthumes d'Andr6 Ch6nier, de la juris- prudence, des lois et trait^s diplomatiques, des rapports et exposes des motifs de 1777 & 1866 par F. Worms. 2 v. i p. 1. viii., 411 p. ; 2 p. 1. 480 p. 16°. Paris, A. Lemerre. 1878. ■ Contents : v. i. Pr6face [Signed Eugdne Pouillet], p. i.-viii. Etude sur le decret de I'an xiii., p. 1-63. Tribunal .civil de la Seine. Audiences des 7, 14, 21 etzS juillet, et II ao^t 1876. Comte rendu du proces relatif aux oeuvres posthumes d*Andr& Ch6nier. MM. Charpentier & cie, £diteurs, contre m. Gabriel de Ch6nier et m. Alphonse Lemerre, Sditeur, p. 64-147: Cour d'appel de Paris, audiences des 8, 15, 22 f^vrier, et ler, 15 et 29 mars X878, p. 149-306, Jurisprudence relative aux questions soule- v4es par le procds Chinier, p. 307-408. v. 2. Historiqua : I. Rapports et exposes des motifs des lois et projets de loi sur le droit des auteurs de 1777 & 1866, p. r-337: IL Legislation litteraire et artistiquc, p. 338-415 : III. Analyse des conventions diplomatiques entre la France et les pays Strangers, p. 416-476. _ A non. notice in " Journal du droit international privi. sme ann^e, 1878. 12°. Paris, no. 11-12, p. 658-659. Questions de propriety litt6raire. Les oeuvres posthumes au point de vue 16gal et critiques du dfecret de I'an iii. In " Le Livre." 2e annfee, tome 2: Bibliographie moderne. 8°. Paris, 3e livraison, 10 mar, 1881, p. 139-144. See also Delalande (E.)— Pouillet (Eugdne). Wrangell (Dr. baron Constantin von). Die prinzipien des literarischen eigenthums mit specieller riicksicht auf dessen juristische form, oconomische, sociale und internation- ale bedeutung, sowie auf die nattirliche begrenzung seines inhaltes und seiner aus- dehnung. 4 p. 1. iii., 150 p. I 1, 8°, Ber- lin, H. Peters, 1866. WuRM (Christian Friedrich). Der schutz des verlagsrechts gegen auswartigen nachdruck. In "Deutsche vierteljahrs-schrift." 3 tes heft, 1841. 8°. Stuttgart & Tubingen, nr. 15, P- 237-312. Zur frage einer einheitlichen deutschen nach- drucksgesetzgebung. 1863. See Witzleben (C. D. von). Zur verstandigung iiber ein allgemeines deut- sches pressgesetz. Mit besonderer beziehung auf die schrift : Ideen zur einfiihrung eines deutschen pressgesetzes, Berlin, &c. 1845. Von einem SUddeutschen. [Anon.'\ In " Deutsche vierteljahrsschrift." i stes heft 1846. 8°, Stuttgart & Tiibingen, nr. 33, p. 248-286. SUPPLEMENTARY TITLES. Abbott (B ; Vaughan). History of copyright. In " The Literary world." v. lo. 4°. Boston, no. 109, March i, 1879, p. 73-74. The year book of jurisprudence for 1880. 8°. Boston, Little, Brown, & co., 1880. Contains: Copyright, p. 113-118. a«(/ Abbott (Austin). A digest of the re- ports of the United States courts, to the year 1867. 4v. 8°. New York, Diossy& Cock- croft, 1867-69. Contains ; Copyright. Revised by G : Ticknor Curtis, V. 2, p. I-II. Same. Supplements. By B : Vaughan Ab- bott. T 868-80. 4 V. 8°. New York, Diossy& CO., 1872-80. Contains : Copyright, v. 5, p. 144-147 : v. 6, p 170-172 ; y. 7, p. 213-215: V. 8, p. 241-242. Same. Abbott's national digest. [Re- vised] to 1885, by B: V. Abbott, v. 1-2. 8°. New York, G. S. Diossy, 1884. Contains : Copyright, v. 2, p. 1-32. AcTEs de la Conference Internationale pour la protection des droits d'auteur reunie £ Berne du 8 au 19 septembre 1884. 3 p. 1., 7-87 p., I 1. fol. Berne, imprimerie K. J. Wyss, 1884. Adam (G. Mercer). New aspects of the copy- right question. In " Rose-Belford's Cana- dian monthly and national review." v. i. 8°. Toronto, no. 3, Sept. 1878, p. 369-376. Alfonso (Luis) and Lermina (Jules). Rap- port pr6sent6 au Congrfes litt6raire inter- national ; au nom de la 3e commission. About 31 p. 8°. Paris, Chaix & ce., 1878. Allezard (Charles). Considerations fecono- miques et juridiques sur la propriety intel- lectuelle. (Article extrait de " La France ju- diciaire.") 8°. Paris, G. Pedone-Lauriel, 1882. Amar (Moise). Dei diritti degli artisti in Italia ed air estero : studii. About 106 p. 8°. To- rino, tip. Camilla, 1880. Ancillon de Jouy (George). De la propri6t6 littferaire et artistique en droit romain ; de la proprifetfe artistique en droit frangais. About 319 p. 8°. Nancy, imp. Crfepin-Leblond ; Paris, Larose,i88o. Anders (Josef, freiherr von). BeitrSge zur lehre vom literarischen und artistischen urhe- berrechte. Eine civilistische studie mit be- sonderer beziehung auf das deutsche und os- terreichische recht. i p. 1. xviii p. i 1., 298 p. I 1. 8°. Innsbruck, Wagner, 1881. Archives de droit et de legislation, v. 1-4. 8°. Bruxelles, Soci6t6 Beige de librairie, 1837-41. Contains : Th^orie des droits des -auteurs sur Ics S reductions de leur intelligence. [By Augustin Charles Lenouard], v. i, p. 27-49 (of ist pagination.) Traitfe des droits d'auteur. Par. A. C. Renouard. [Anon review]^ V. 3, p. 220-224. Arnold (Matthew). Copyright. In " Irish essays and others by Matthew Arnold." 12°. London, Smith, Elder & co,, 1882, p. 244-280. Association for the reform and codification of the law of nations. London. Report of the ninth annual conference, held at Cologne, August i6th-i9th, i88i. x p. i 1. 243 p. 8°. London, W : Clowes & sons, 1882. Contains; International copyright, p. 145-165: (Re- port of committee on international copyright, p. 146-153: Remarks, P.153-15S : The Scandinavian copyright laws. [By Alfred Kirsebom], p. 155-162: Industrial and ar- tistic copyright [By C: H: E: Carmichael], p. 163-165.) Atlantic monthly, v. 22. 8°. Boston, 1868. Contains : Ideal property. By James D. Whelpley, p. 167-173. Atlas (The) company of Scotland v. A. Fullar- ton and company. Report of the trial at the instance of the Atlas company of Scotland against A. Fullarton and company, publish- ers, Edinburgh and London. "Tried before a jury at Edinburgh on the 27th, 28th, and 29th daysof July 1853. By I. M. Duncan, advocate. 2 p. I. 44 p. 8°. Edinburgh and London, W: Blackwood & sons, 1853. Auger (Louis Simon). Observations lues en la stance du 26 dfecembre 1825. In France. Commission de la propriM littiraire. Collection des procfes-verbaux. 4°. Paris, Pillet Aln6, 1826, p. 73-78. AzEVEDO (Fernand d'). fitude sur la propriety littferaire, pferpetuitfi, droit international. About 72 p. 16°. Paris, ve Aillaud, Guillard & cie, 1873. Baer (H. J.) Der Internationale vertrag zum schutze literarischer erzeugnisse mit speziel- ler beziehung auf Frankfurt am Main vom theoretisch-moralischen und praktisch-ma- teriellen standpunkt au's beleuchtet. (Als manuskript gedruckt.) 8°. [n. p., n. d., Frankfurt a. M., 1856.] Same. II. Nachtragliche bemerkungen und erlauterungen. (Als manuskript gedruckt.) 8°. Frankfurt a. M., 1857. Balzac (Honor6 de). Notes remises ^ MM. les d6put6s composant la commission de la loi sur la propriety littferaire. About 24 p. 8°. Paris, Hetzel & Paulin, 1841. Bartoccini (Nicola). I diritti ed i doveri degli autori delle opere d'ingegno in rela- zione all'arte della pittura. About 80 p. 4°. Roma, tip. frat. Pallotta, 1881. Becker (Rudolf Zacharias). Das eigenthums- recht an geisteswerken, mit einer dreyfachen beschwerde iiber das bischoflich-augsbur- gische vikariat wegen nachdruck, verstiimme- lung und verfSlschung des noth-und hulfs- biichleins. About 94 p. 8° Frankfurt & Leipzig, F. C. W. Vogel, 1789. Review by Chr. Sigismund Krause in " Neuen teutschen museum." v. 3. 8"*. Leipzig, Sept. 1790, p. 934-962. BergsOe (J6rgen Vilhelm). Provinspressen eg den literaere ejendomsret. 8°, Kjoben- havn, 1882, 54 LITERARY PROPERTY. BiEDERMANN (Karl). Das geistige eigenthum mit bezug auf zeitungen und zeitschriften. Ein referat fur den dritten deutschen jour- nalistentag. 8°. Berlin, F. Duncker, 1869. BlELlTz (Gustaf Alexander). Versuch, die von dem verlagsrecht gelteriden grundsatze aus der analogic derpositiven gesetze abzuleiten. 8°. Dresden, Grimmer, 1799. BiGNON (Louis Pierre lEdouard). Lettre a M. Ambroise Firmin Didot, sur la contrefa^on 6trang6re. [Verclives, 5 Octobre 1837.] In " Histoire de France sous Napoleon. Par M. Bignon." v. 7. 8°. Paris, F. Didot freres, 1838, pp. i.-xxxvi. BiRNEAUM (J. A.) Eines aufrichtigen patrioten unpartheiische gedanken iiber einige quellen und wirkungen des verfalls der jetzigen buchhandlung, worin insonderheit die betru- gereien derbucherpranumerationen entdeckt, und zugleich erwiesen wird, dass der unbe- fugte nachdruck unprivilegirter biicher ein alien rechten zuwiderlaufender diebstahl sei. 8°. Schweinfurt, 1733. Blaine (Delabere Roberton). On the laws of artistic copyright, and their defects. For the use of artists, sculptors, engravers, printsel- lers, etc. viii., 85 p. i 1. 8°. [London], J : Murray, 1853. Report to the committee on artistic copy- right [of the Society of arts. With the report of the committee.] In " The Journal of the Society of arts." v. 6. 4°. London, no. 279, March 26 1858, p. 293-301. Blanc (Etienne). Traits de la contrefajon en tous genres. 4e fed. 2 p. 1. xvi., 820 p. 8°. Paris, H. Plon; Cosse, 1855. and Beaume (Alexandre). Code g6n6ral de la proprifetfe industrielle, littferaire et artist- ique. 2 p. 1. viii., 643 p. 8°. Paris, Cosse, 1854- Bluntschli (Johann Caspar). Rights of au- thors. In " Cyclopaedia of political science. Edited by J: J. Lalor." v. i. 8°. Chicago, Rand, McNally & co., 1881, p. 182-183. Bohn (H: G:). The question of unreciprocated foreign copyright in Great Britain. A report of the speeches and proceedings at a public meeting held at the Hanover square rooms, July I, 1851, Sir E : Bulwer Lytton. bart., in the chair. With notes, viii., 68 p. 8°. Lon- don, Bohn, 1851. BoswELL (James). The decision of the court of session, upon the questid^ of literary prop- erty ; in the cause J: Hinton of London, bookseller, pursuer ; against Alexander Don- aldson and J: Wood, booksellers in Edin- burgh, and James Meurose bookseller in Kilmarnock, defenders, i p. 1., iv., 37 p. 4°. Edinburgh, J. Donaldson, for A. Donaldson, 1774- Bozzo-Bagnera (Giovanni Battista). Sulla perpetua proprieti letteraria ed artistica. Studio. 2a edizione riveduta e corretta. 48 p. 12°. Milano, C. Barbini, 1871. Breulier (Adolphe), Du droit de perp6tuit6 de la proprifetfe Intellectuelle. Thfeorie de la proprifite des fecrivains, des artistes, des in- venteurs et des fabricants. About 140 p. 8°. Paris, A. Durand, 1855. Brief (A) statement on the subject of assum- ed foreign copyright ; addressed to British authors, publishers, and others interested in British literature. About 16 p. 8°. London, 1851. Briggs(C: F:). Literary piracy. [Anon, review of " Letters on international copy-right. By H. C. Carey." Philadelphia, A. Hart, 1853.] In " Putnam's monthly magazine." v. 3. 8°. New York, no. 13, Jan. 1854, p. 96-103. Brito (Jos6). Legislacion Mexicana. Indice alfabetico razonado de las leyes, decretos, reglamentos, ordenes y circulares que se ban expedido desde el afio de 1821 hasta el de 1869. [Apendice, i870-'7i.] 3 v. 8°. Mexico, imprenta del gobierno, a cargo de J. M. San- doval, 1872-3. Contains : Propiedad litcraria, v. 3, p. 194-2CX), apen- dice, p. 7S5-789. Britton (J:). The rights of literature. 77 p. 8*. London, for the author, by A. J. Valpy, 1814. Contains : A catalogue of tracts concerning literary property, etc. 35 titles, p. 71-77. Brousse (M. — ). Propri§t6 littferaire. In " Re- pertoire de la nouvelle legislation civile, commerciale et administrative ; par Favard de Langlade." v. 4. 4°. Paris, 1823, p. 618- 661. Bruzzo (Gian Carlo). Del diritto di propriety suUe produzioni dell'ingegno. About 51 p. 8°. Genova, tip. del R. istituto sordomuti, i88i. Bump (Orlando Franklin). The law of patents, trade-marks, labels and copyrights. 2d ed. ccxviii., 667 p. 8°. Baltimoi'e, Cushings & Bailey, 1884. (Copyrights, p. 492-526.) Burger (Gottfried August). Vorschlag, dem biichernachdrucke zu steuern. In " G. A. Burger's Sammtliche werke. Herausgege- ben von Karl v. Reinhard." v. 6. 8°. Ber- lin, 1825. Burke (P:) The copyright law and the press : an essay to show the necessity of an imme- diate amendment of the copyright law upon the removal of the stamp duty from news- papers. 8°. London, S. Low & son, 1855. Society for promoting the amendment of the law. 20th session. The present state of the law of copyright in literature and the fine arts, with a view to its amendment. (A paper by mr. Serjeant Burke, read at a general meeting of the society, held on monday, ist June, 1863, and ordered to be printed.) 15 p. 8°. [London, M'Corquedale & CO., 1863.] Caillemer (Exupfere). fitudes sur les anti- quitfes juridiques d'Athfenes. 6" 6tude. La proprifetfe littferaire iAthfenes. 8°. [Caenl • Paris, E. Thorin, 1868. ' Callender (E: B.) The law for playwrights. In Southern law review." New series. LITERARY PROPERTY. 55 V. 8. 8°. St.'Louis, no. i, April-May, 1882, P- 13-32. Calmels (Antoine Edouard). De la propri6t6 et de la contrefajon des oeuvres de I'lntelli- gence, comprenanl : les productions litt6- raires, dramatiques, musicales ; les oeuvres artistiques de la peinture, du dessin, de la gravure et de la sculpture ; les litres d'ou- vrages, [etc.] Avec le texte des lois et dfe- crets sur la matiSre. vii., 866 p. i 1. 8°. Paris, Cosse, 1856. Projet du code p^nal portugais. Ob- servations sur le chapitre viii. concernant la repression des contrefajons et autres d6Hts en matifere de propri6te littferaire et artist- ique, [etc. J Adress6es d m. Levy Maria Jordao. 2 p. 1. 51 p. 8°. Paris, au bureau des annales de la propri6t6 industrielle, artistique et littferaire, 1862. Cappellemans (Victor). De la propriety lit- t6raire et artistique en Belgique et en France. Histoire, legislation, jurisprudence, conven- tion du 12 aoiit 1852 avec commentaire. Rfeglements d'exfecution en Belgique et en France. Notes explicatives, etc. 2 p. 1. xxvii., 375 p. 12°. Bruxelles, Delevingne & Callewaert ; Paris, J. Renouard & comp., 1854. Cases (The) of the appellants and respondents in the cause of literary property. \Anon.'\ 4 p. 1. 59 p. + 3 p. 4°. London, printed for J. Bew, W. Clarke, P. Brett, and C. Wilkin, 1774- Cattreux (Louis), fitude sur le droit de pro- priSte des oeuvres dramatiques ct musicales. About 217 p. 8°. Bruxelles, imp. A. Le- f&vre ; lib. F. Larcier, 1883. Celliez (Henry). Plaidoirie de me Celliez. [Cour imperiale de Paris, 12 dfec, 1857. Re- vendication de la propriety exclusive du pseudonyme Nadar.J In "La Tribune judi- ciaire, par J. Sabbatier." v. 5. 8°, Paris, C. Borrani, 1857, p. 295-311. Champein (Marie Francois Stanislas). Reflex- ions de m. Champein, lues dans la seance du 27 fevrier 1826. In France. Commission de la propriiU litUraite. Collection des procfes- verbaux. 4°, Paris, Pillet atn6, 1826, p. 241- 249. Chapman (J:) The commerce of literature. [Anon.] In "The Westminster review." [v. 57], n. s., V. I. 8°. London, J: Chapman, no. 112, n. s. no. 2, April i, 1852, p. 511-554. Same : Cheap books, and how to get them. Being a reprint of the article on " The com- merce of literature," together with a brief ac- count of the origin and progress of the re- cent agitation for free trade in books. To which is added, the judgment pronounced by lord Campbell, 8°, London, J; Chapman, 1852? Chatain (Marcel). Faculty de droit de Paris. De Tin bonis en droit romain. De la pro- priete littSraire en droit frangais. Thise pour le doctorat, L'acte public sur les ma- tieres ci-aprfes sera presente et soutenu le 23 decembre, 1880. 3 p. 1. 5-86 p. i 1. 5-190 p. 8°. Paris, F. Pichon & A. Cotillon, 1880. De la propriety litt^raire, 5-igo p. Cleveland (H.) Copy-right [and] Copy-right law. In "The American monthly maga- zine.'' New series. 8°. Philadelphia, Boston andNew York, 1837: (No. i, To the writers of America. Anon.), v. 3, Feb., p. 153-158 : (No. 2. To the publishers of America. yi«o».), V. 3, March, p. 283-287 : (No. 3. To the readers of the United States. Anon., signed H. C), V. 4, Oct., p. 374-377- Clunet (fidouard). Extrait du compte rendu stfenographique du Congrfes international de la proprifete artistique, tenu k Paris du 18 au 21 septembre 1878. 40 p. 8°. Paris, impri- merie Nationale, 1879. Same. In " Congrfes international de la propriety artistique. Compte rendu." 8°. Paris, imp. Nationale, 1879, p. 119-158. Commerce (The) of literature, 1852. 5'« Chap- man (J:) CONGRES de la propriety littferaire et artistique tenu a Bruxelles, les 27, 28, 29, et 30 septem- bre 1858. I. Organisation du congrfes et ad- hesions. 2. Analyse des seances du congrfes. 3. Discours et rapports. 4. Resolutions du congrfes. In. " Annales de la propriete in- dustrielle artistique et litteraire." v, 4, 8°. Paris, 1858, p. 401-454. CoNGRBS international de la propriete artis- tique. See France. Constant (L.) De la propriete en general et de la propriete litteraire. [Seances du 30 juin et du 7 juillet 1844.] In Societe litte- raire de I'universite catholique de Louvain. Choix de memoires. v. 3. 8°, Louvain, Fonteyn, 1845, p. 185-254. I. De la propri^t^ en £6n6ral, p. 187-225 : II. De la propriete litt6raire, p. 225-254. Copyright. [/i«i>«.] In "The Leisure hour." v. 14. 4°. London, 1865, I., in no. 728, Dec. 9, P- 774-776 : II., in no. 729, Dec. 16, p. 788- 791 : III., in no. 730, Dec. 23, p. 804-807. Copyright (The) act. The law of copyright, regarding authors, dramatic writers, and musical composers ; as altered by the recent statute of the 5 & 6 Victoria [ist July 1842], analysed and simplified: with an explanatory introduction, and an appendix, containing, at full, the new copyright and the dramatic property acts. By a barrister. [Anon.] 40 p. 8°. London, J. Gilbert, [1842.] Copy-right (The) law. [Avon.'] In " The Monthly review." [v. 145], new series v. i. 8°. London, E. Henderson, no. i, Jan, 1838, p. 52-63- A review of i. " Speech of mr. Serjeant Talfourd on literary property, i8th of May 1837." London, Sherwood & CO. 2. " Remarks on the speech of Serjeant Talfourd. By T: Tegg." London, Tegg, 1837. Cdrtis (G; Ticknor). Copyright. /»"Alaw dictionary. By John Bouvier." 14th ed. v. I. 8°. Philadelphia, J, B. Lippincott & co., 1882, p, 363-366. S6 LITERARY PROPERTY. Curtis (G: Ticknor). See also Abbott (B: Vaughan) and Abbott (Austin). A digest of reports. 1867-69. Cyclopedia of political science. See Lalor (J: J., editor). Dambach (Otto). Der deutsch-franzosische lit- terar-vertrag vom 19. April, 1883. Mit er- lauterungen. About vi. , 74 p. 8°. Berlin, T. C. F. Enslin, 1883. Einige bemerkungen zur lehre von ur- heberrechte. In " Zeitschrift fur die deut- sche gesetzgebung und fiir einheitliches deutsches recht." v. 6. 8°. Berlin, 1872, p. 51-60. Die strafbarkeit des vorsatzes und der fahrlassigkeit beimrergehen des nachdrucks im preussischen rechte. About 32 p. 8°. Berlin, I. Guttentag, 1864. [Aus Preussi- scher anwaltszeitung, 1864, besonders abge- druckt.] Dawson (S. E.) Copyright in books : an insight into its origin, and an account of the present state of the law in Canada : a lecture ; being one of the occasional lectures delivered be- fore the law school of Bishop's college at Sherbrooke, Thursday, Jan. 26, '82. About 40 p. 8°. Montreal, Dawson brothers, 1882. Anon, notice in " The Albany law journal," v. 26. 8°. Albany, no. ii, Sept. g, 1882, p. 201. A non, notice in ** The Popular science monthly." V. 21. 8'. New York, no. 5, Sept. 1882, p. 704. Anon, notice in "The Publishers' circular." v. 45. 8®. London, no. 1077, Aug. i, 1882, p. 655-656. Delalain (Auguste Henri Jules). Lfegislation de la propri6t6 litteraire et artistique suivie des conventions Internationales. Nouv. 6d., revue et augmenlfie. x., 240 p. 8°. Paris, typographic et librairie Delalain, 1858. Nouvelle legislation des droits de pro- priete litteraire et artistique accompagnee de notes explicatives et suivie d'un resum^ de la legislation des pays etrangers. 66me ed., revue et augmentee. x., 84 p. 12°. Paris, J. Delalain, 1867. Denkschrift tiber den biichernachdruck ; zu- gleich bittschrift um bewiirkung eines deut- schen reichsgesetzes gegen denselben. Den erlauchten, bei dem congress zu Wien ver- sammleten gesandten deutscher staaten ehr- erbietigst uberreicht im namen deutscher buchhandler. 3 p. 1. 38 p, 8°. Leipzig, P. G. Kummer, 1814. Signed by Friedrich Justin Bertuch, Weimar ; Johann Georg Cotta, Stuttgart ; Johann Friedrich Hartknoch, Paul Gotthelf Kummer, Carl Friedrich Enoch Richter, Friedrich Christian Wilhelm Vogel, Leipzig. Deschamps (E.)^ fitude sur la propriete in- dustrielle, litteraire et artistique au point de vue de la cession des droits de I'inventeur, du fabricant et de I'auteur. About 120 p. 8°. Paris, Larose & Forcel, 1882. Desmarest (Ernest). Plaidoirie de me Des- marest. [Cour imperiale de Paris. 12 dec, 1857. Revendication de la proprifitfi ex- clusive du pseudonyme Nadar.] In " La Tribune judiciaire. ParJ. Sabbatier." v. 5. 8°. Paris, C, Borrani, 1857, ?■ 311-322. Dublan (Manuel) and Lozano (Jose Maria). Legislacion mexicana 6 coleccion completa de las disposiciones legislativas expedidas desde la independencia de la republica. Edicion oficial. v. i-ii. [1687-1871.] fol. M6xico, imprenta del Comercio, a cargo de Dublan y Lozano, hijos, [etc.], 1876-79. Contains: Decreto de lode Junio de r8i3, — Reglas para conservar ^ los escritores la propiedad de sus obras, V. I, p. 412. Diciembre 3 de 1846. Decreto del gobiemo. Sobre propiedad literaria, v. 5, p. 227-228. Duncan (I. M.) See Atlas (The) company of Scotland, vs. A. Fullarton and company. Duval (Alexandre). Observations de m. A. Duval, lues k la seance du 3 fevrier 1826. In France. Commission de la propriety litti- raire. Collection des procds-verbaux. 4°. Paris, Pillet atne, 1826, p. 181-190. Ebers (Georg). Der nachdruck deutscher biicher in Holland. Eine zuschrift an das Magazin. In " Dag Magazin fiir die littera- tur des in- und auslandes." 53. jahrgang. 4°. Leipzig, nr. 2, den 12. Januar 1884, p. 29-30 : nr. 6, den 9 Februar 1884, p. 93-94. Ehlers (Martin). Ueber die unzulassigkeit des buchernachdrucks nach dem natiirlichen zwangsrecht. About 194 p. 8°. Dessau und Leipzig, 1785. Enslin (Adolph). Ueber Internationale ver- lagsvertrage mit besonderer beziehung auf Deutschland. About 41 p. 8°. Berlin, T. C. F. Enslin, 1855. " Entered at Stationers' hall." A sketch of the history and privileges of the company of stationers. With notes on Francis Moore, John Partridge, and other distinguished per- sonages. [Anon.] 2 p. 1. 32 p. 12°. London, printed by M. Thomas, sold by E. Truelove, 1871. Entwurf eines gesetzes fiir Deutschland zum schutzedeseigcnthums an werken derwissen- schaft und kunst gegen nachdruck und nach- bildung, nebst motiven. Als manuskript gedruckt. About I72p. 4°. Berlin, J. Sittenfeld, 1857. Faider (Charles). Note sur le congr^s de la propriety littferaire et artistique, tenu i Brux- elles, en Septembre 1858. In " Bulletins de I'Acad^mie royale des sciences, des lettres et des beaux-arts de Belgique." 27e ann^e, 2me s6rie, v. 5. 8°. Bruxelles, Hayez, 1858, p. 521-531. Same. In "Compte rendu des travaux du congrfes de la proprifetfe litteraire et ar- tistique, par Bdouard' Romberg." v. 2. 8°. Bruxelles & Leipzig, 6. Flatau, 1859, P- 312- 318. Ferrari (Paolo). Introduzione storica. See Rosmini (Enrico). La legislazione e la giur- isprudenza dei teatri e del diritti d'autore. 1872-73. Fichte (Johann Gottlieb). Beweis der unrecht- massigkeit des buchernachdrucks. Ein ra- sonnement und eine parabel. In " Berliner monatsschrift." v. 21. 8°. Berlin, Mai 1793, p. 443-483. LITERARY PROPERTY. 57 FiCHTE (Johann Gottlieb) Same. /« "Johann Gottlieb Fichte'ssammtliche werke. Heraus- gegeben von J. H. Fichte." 8 ter bd. 8°. Berlin, Veit & comp., 1846, p. 223-244. Field (G: W. ) Field's lawyers' briefs, con- sisting of treatises on every important legal subject, alphabetically arranged, v. 2. 8°. Albany : New York, Banks & brothers, 1884. Contains : Copyright, p. 136-153. FiNNAMORE (J:) Imperial copyright law, as af- fecting the colonies. /« " The Victorian re- view." v. 4. 8°. Melbourne, no. 24, Oct. i, 1881, p. 712-722. Fliniaux (Charles). Essai sur les droits des auteurs Strangers en France et des auteurs fran5ais en pays Strangers. In " Revue gfen- 6rale du droit." 8°. Paris, 1879, p. 25-50, 140-150. France. Minis/he de l' agriculture et du com- merce. Exposition universelle internationaie de 1878, ^ Paris. Congrfes et confferences du Palais duTrocadfero. Comptes rendus st6no- graphiques publics sous les auspices du co- mite central des congrfes et conferences et la direction de m. Ch. Thirion. Congrfes in- ternational de la proprifetfe artistique tenu i Paris du 18 au 21 septembre. no. 27 de la sferie. 2 p.l. 213 p. 8°. Paris, imprimerie Nationale, 1879. Franzos (Karl Emil). Autorrecht und leih- bibliothek. In " Das Magazin fiirdie littera- tur des in-und auslandes." 53. jahrgang. 4°. Leipzig, nr. i, 5. Jan. 1884, p. 4-6 : nr. 2, 12. Jan. 1884, p. 18-20. Froriep (Robert). Schutz vor nachbildung der kunstwerke. Nach dem konigl. preuss. gesetz vom 11. Juni 1837 filr kiinstler und kunstverleger erlautert. 8°. Berlin, Sachse & comp., 1839. Ganz (Johann Friedrich Ferdinand). Ueber- sicht der griinde wegen des strafbaren des biichernachdrucksund vorschlage, wiediesem ilbel durch ein allgemein verbindliches reichsgesetz vorgebeugt werden konne. About 66 p. 3°. Regensburg, 1790, Gauthier (Hippolyte). De la propri6t6 litter- aire sur les livres d'feducation. Question de jurisprudence. ArrSt de la cour imp6riale de Paris dans le procfes Jeannel et Delagrave contre Taulier et Eug. Belin. About 16 p. 8°. Paris, imp. Rouge fr6res, Dunon et Fresnfe, 1868. Gerber (Carl Friedrich von). Ueber die natur der rechte des schriftstellers und verlegers. In " Gesammelte juristische abhandlungen von C. F. von Gerber." 2. Bd. 8°. Jena, DuflFt, 1872, p. 261-310. Gerhard (Friedrich). Der nachdruck deutscher schriften in den Vereinigten Staaten, und seine gegner. 50 p. 12°. New York, [Randel & Bloemeke], 1867. " Wird gratis ausgegeben und kann in beliebigen Parthieen vom Verfasser bezogen werden." Germany, Gesetz, betreffend das urheberrecht an schriftwerken, abbildungcn, musikalischen kompositionen und dramatischen werken. Vom II. Juni 1870. 24 p. 16°. Berlin, F. Kortkampf, 1870. Geschichte des bilchernachdrucks. In "Jour- nal ftlr Deutschland, historisch politischen inhalts, herausgegeben von Fr. Buchholz. " 8°. Berlin, 2. Bd., 1815, p. 581-620: 3. Bd., 1816, p. 44-67, 198-216. Glaser (Matthaus Christian). Ueber kauf und verkauf dergedanken, oderkonnengedanken marktwaare sein ? 8°. Kulmbach & Coburg, wittwenversorgungsanstalt, 1820. Same. Ueber den diebstahl der nachdruck- er. Ein nachsttlck zu " Ueber kauf und verkauf der gedanken." 8°. Kulmbach & Coburg, 1821. Godson (R:) A practical treatise on the law of patents for inventions, and of copyright in literature, the drama, music, engraving and sculpture, and also in ornamental and useful designsfor the purposes of sale and exhibition. 2d ed. To which is added a supplement, bringing the patent and copyright law down to the present time. 2 p. 1. vii.-xxxv., 496 p. -hg4 p. -l-viii., 236 p. 8°. London, W : Ben- ning &CO., 1851. Copyright, p. 305-496 (ist pagination); p. 57-102 (3d pagination.) Great Britain. The law reports. The public general statutes. 1882-1884. v. 18-20. 8°, London, 1882-84. Contains : An act to amend the law of copyright re- lating CO musical compositions. [45 & 46 Victoria, chapter 40, loth Aug. 1882], v. 18, p. 144-145. GrolmAnn (Karl Ludwig Wilhelm von). Der bllchernachdruck in seiner neuesten gestalt. In " Bibliothek filr die peinliche rechtswis- senschaft und gesetzkunde." i. Bd. 8°. Her- born, 2. stuck, 1798, p. 269-278. Gutachten des konigl ich preussischen gehei- men ober-tribunals iiber den begrifFdes straf- baren nachdrucks und der demselben nach § 3 des gesetzes vom 11. Juni 1837 zum schutze des eigenthums an werken der wissenschaft und kunst gegen nachdruck und nachbildung, gleichzuachtenden vergehungen, auf veran- lassung des justiz ministers Muhler abgege- ben am 13. Februar 1844. 4°. Berlin, Hey- mann, 1884. [Aus dem Justiz-ministerial-blatt, 1844, besonders abgedruckt.] Heydemann (Ludwig Eduard). Der Inter- nationale schutz des autorrechtes. In " Ge- sammelte aufsatze und mittheilungen aus dem BSrsenblatt fiir den deutschen buch- handel." 8°. Leipzig, 1875, p. 278-297. International copyright. — The claims of literature. [Anon.] /»" The United States democratic review." New series, v. 42. 8°. New York, Dec. 1858, p. 454-464. Italy. Ministero di agricoltura, industrid e com- mercio. {Direzione dett'industfia e del commer- cio.) Annali dell'industria e del commercio 1879, num. 7. Notizie statistiche intorno ai diritti d'autore sulle opere d'ingegno ed Alle privative industriali, marchii e segni distin- S8 LITERARY PROPERTY. tivi e disegni e modelli di fabbrica. 26 p. 12°. Roma, tipografia E. Botta, 1879. Notizie statistiche intorno ai diritti d'autore suUe opere d'ingegno, p. 5-13. Jenaische responsum juris sammt vfilligem beifall dreyer juristenfacultaten, worinnen dargethan wird, dass denen autoribus der in druck gegebenen biicher und deren cession- ariis, welche von hohen obrigkeiten keine privilegia darilber ausgewirkt, kein mono- polium solches biicherverkaufs zustehe, noch vor weltlichen gerichten ein recht zukomme, andern den nachdruck solcher biicher zu verbieten oder wider selbige desshalben um bestrafung anzusuchen. 8°. Erfurt, 1726. Kaerger (Karl). Die theorien iiber die juri- stische natur des urheberreciits. Eine kriti- sciie studie. Inaugural-dissertation zur er- langung der juristischen doctorwiirde in der rechts- & staatswissenschaftlichen facultat der universitat Strassburg. 47 p. 8°. Berlin, Puttkamraer & Muiilbrecht, 1882. Kaiser (Hermann). Entwurf eines gesetzes fiir den norddeutschen Bund, zum schutze der original-photographien gegen unbefugte nachbildung. Nebst erlauterungen und ei- ner denkschrift iiber die schutzberechtigung der orig.-photographien. About 72 p. 8°. Berlin, Scliroeder, 1868. Kent (James). Commentaries on American law. 13th ed., edited by C: M. Barnes. 4 v. 8°. Boston, Little, Brown, & co., 1884. Contains: Copyrights of authors, v. z, p. 521-538. KiRSEBOM (Alfred). The Scandinavian copy- right laws. In "Association for the reform and codification of the lawof nations. Report of the gth annual conference, Cologne, Aug. 1881." 8°. London, W; Clowes & sons, 1882, p. 155-162. Knigge (Adolph Franz Friedrich Ludwig, Freiherr von). Ueber schriftsteller und schriftstellerei. 8°. Hannover, Hahn, 1793. Krisis (Die) des teutschen buchhandels, her- beigefiihrt durch teutschebuchhandler. Oder abgedrungene beleuchtung der denkschrift liber den biichernachdruck. About 39 p. 8°. Reutlingen, 18:5. Lachmann (Karl). Ausgaben classischer werke darf jeder nachdrucken. Eine war- nung fiir herausgeber. 8". Berlin, Besser, 1841. Concerning the reprinting of certain works by Lessing. out of the collected edition by Lachmann. Lahure (Charles). Observations sur la de- mande faite par des libraires reunis en com- mission, de reconnattre chez nous, et sans condition, la propriete litt6raire des Stran- gers ; et moyen de paralyser les contrefafons beiges sans nuire \ aucune des branches de notre Industrie. About 32 p. 8°. Paris, imp. de Crapelet, 1840. Lalor (J: J., editor). Cyclopsedia of political science, v. 1-3. 8°. Chicago, Rand, McNally & co., [etc.], 1881-84. Contains : Rights of authors (by Johann Caspar Bluntschli), v. I, p. 182-183. Copyright (by H: Dunning Macleod), v. i, p. 642-648. Literary property (by G: Haven Putnam), v. 3, p. 392-411. Last (Albert). Das autorenrecht und die leihbibliotheken. Vortrag, gehalten auf dem schriftstellertage zu Darmstadt am 10. Sep- tember 1883. 8°. Wien, E. Last, 1883. Lea (H; C:) International copyright. An open letter [to Hon. S: J. Randall, M.C. ; Phila- delphia, February 18, 1884.] 8 p. 8°. [Phila- delphia, 1884]. Lloyd (E:) Consolidation of the law of copy- right. In " The Solicitors' journal and re- _ porter." v. 6. 8°. London, 1862, no. I. in ' Tune 28, p. 626-7 ; no. II. in July 5, p. 645- 6; no. III. in July 12, p. 663-5; no- IV. in July 19, p. 68i-'2 ; no. V. in July 26, p. 702- '3 ; no. VI. in Aug. 16, p. 75i-'3 ; no. VII. — The new copyright act, in Aug. 23, p. 767-8. Loose leaves by a literary lounger. About authors and copyrights. [AnonJ] In "The United States magazine, and democratic re- view " New series, v. 12. 8°. New York, no. 57, March 1843, p. 290-300. Luthereau (Jean Guillaume Antoine). Opin- ion d'un voleur artistique et litteraire sur la contrefagon ; moyens de I'abolir sans leser les int^rSts materiels du pays. 8°. Bruxelles, 1852. Macaulay (T: Babington, baron Macaulay). Speeches. In two volumes. 8°. New York, W. J. Widdleton, 1866. Contains: The copyright bill. February 5, 1841, V.I, p. 387-403. The copyright bill. April 6, 1842, v. 2, p. 78-88. McCrary (G: W.) The literary property of authors. In "The Central law journal." V. 17. 8°. St. Louis, no. 14, Oct. 5, 1883, p. 268-271. Menzel (Wolfgang). Antrag, die Wiirttem- bergische regierung um ein gesetz zu bitten, wodurch der nachdruck als ein, das eigen- thum beeintrachtigendes, der ofFentlichen moral schadliches, und die ehre des Wiirt- tembergischen namens vor dem auslande verunglimpfendes institut unbedingt aufge- hoben wiirde, vorgetragen in der sitzung der kammer der abgeordneten vom 2. Juli. 8°. Stuttgart, Metzler, 1833. Mertens (G.) Ueber nachdruck, mit rUck- sicht auf C. M. von Weber's clavier-compo- sitionen. Erste rechtmassige gesammtaus- gabe revidirt und corrigirt von H. W. Stolze. Eine skizze aus der tagesgeschichte. (Als manuskript gedruckT.) 8°. Berlin, 1857. Modifications proposfies au projetde loi pr6- sentfe 4 la chambre des dfeputfes le 18 Janvier sur la proprifetS litteraire, et observations soumises au gonvernement par des libraires de Paris. 4°. Paris, imp. de F: Didot, 1841. MuquArdt (Charles). De la contrefagon et de son influence pernicieuse sur la littferature, la librairie etles branches d'industrie qui s'y rattachent ; suivi d'un projet de convention entre la Belgique et la France pour I'aboli- tion de la contrefagon, Mimoire adress6 & la LITERARY PROPERTY. 59 chambre des reprfisentants beiges. 8°. Brux- elles, 1844. Noll (Ferdinand). " Suum cuique !" (Jedem das seine !) Das geistigeeigenthum oder das urheberrecht an werken der arbeit jeder art, wie an schriften, tonwerken.erfindungen von maschihen &c. gegen nachahmung. Mit einem gesetzentwurfe und erlSuterungen zu demselben. (Schutz der werke der wissen- schaft und kunst, musterschutz, erfindungs- patente.) About 51 p. 8°. Berlin, Reichardt & Zander, 1862. [Betrachtungen tiber die gesammten erwerbsverhaltnisse des preussls- chen staates. 4. heft.] "Suum cuique'" (Jedem das seine!). Die staats-vertrage, das eigenthum iiber- haupt, das urheber-eigenthum (geistigeeigen- thum an schrift-, ton-, bild-werken, an soge- nannten mustern und andern erfindungen) insonderheit. About 47 p. 8°. Berlin, Geelhaar, 1865. [Betrachtungen iiber die gesammten erwerbsverhaltnisse des preussis- chen staates. 5. heft] Norway. Kongeriget Norges 25de ordentlige Storthings forhandlinger i aaret 1876. 4°. Kristiania, [1B76]. Contains : Om udfEerdigelse af en lov om beskyttelsc af den saakaldte skrifteiendomsret, v. 3, oth. prp. no. S, 29 p. Indstilling fra justltskomiteen angaaende den kon- gellge proposition til lov cm beskyttelse af den saakaldte skrifteiendomsret, v. 6 B., p. 14S-153. (The law pro- tecting literary property, as now in force in Norway, is contained, p. 149-153). 26de ordentlige storthings forhandlinger i aaret 1877. 4° Christiania, [1877]. Contains : Ang. udfserdigelse af en lov om beskyttelse af den saakaldte kunstneriske eiendomsret^ v. 3, oth. prp. no. 13, 12 p. Indstilling fra justitskomiteen, v. 6 B., p. 51-53. An|r. udfaerdigelse at en lov om beskyttelse af fbtografiske bllleder, v. 3, oth. prp. no. 14, 6 p. Indstil- ling fra justitskomiteen, v. 6 B., p. 54-55. (The two re- ports contain the texts of the laws, now in force in Nor- way, protecting artistic property and photographs). Orelli (Aloys von). Das Schweizerische Bun- desgesetz betrefiFend das urheberrecht an wer- ken der litteratur und kunst, unter beriick- sichtigen der bezilglich-staatsvertrage erlaU- tert. About viii,, 174 p. 8°, Zurich, Schult- hess, 1884. Parsons (Theophilus, jr.) The law of con- tracts. 6th ed. 3 V. 8°. Boston, Little, Brown, & CO., 1873. Contains : The law of copyright, v. 2, p. 338-360. Same. 7th ed. With additions by W: V. Kellen. 3 v. 8°. Boston, Little, Brown, & co., 1883. Contains : The law of copyright, v. 2. p. 329-349. Pknzenkuffer (Christoph Wilhelm Friedrich). Beitrag zur endlichen festen bestimmung des rechtsverhaltnisses zwischen autor und ver- leger. 8°. Nurnberg, Verfasser, 1823. Pic (Franjois Antoine). Code des imprimeurs, libraires, ^crivains et artistes, ou recueil et concordance des dispositions legislatives qui dfeterminent leurs obligations et leurs droits. 2 V, 8°. Paris, Corby, 1826. Pleadings (The) of the counsel before the house of lords, in the great cause concerning liter- ary property, iv,, 39 p, 4°. London, printed for C. Wilkin, S. Axtell, J. Axtell, and J. Browne, [«. d., 1774.] Popular (The) science monthly, v. 22. 8°. New York, 1883. Cf7»^az»f.- Piratical publishers. By Leonard Scott, no. 5, march, p. 656-659. Law against right. [Editorial], no. 5, march, p. 699-702. " Piratical publishers,^' or a pirati- cal go\ eminent. [Editorial], no. 5, march, p. 702-704. Pressgesetz (Das), nebst den gesetzen Uber das urheberrecht, dem musterschutz- mar- kenschutz und patentgesetz. Textausgabe mit kurzen anmerkungen und sachregister. Herausgegeben von einem prakt. juristen. [Anon.] About 134 p. 16°. Leipzig, P. Rec- 1am jun., 1883. [Universal - bibliothek, nr. 1704.] Same : 2. Auflage. 134 p. 16°. Leipzig, P. Reclam jun., 1884. Putnam (G: Haven). Literary property. /» " Cyclopaedia of political science. Edited by J: J. Lalor." v. 3. 8°. Chicago, M. B. Cary & co., 1884, p. 392-411. Same. 8°. Chicago, A. H. Andrews & CO., 1884. Anon, notice in "The Nation." v. 39. 4*. New York, no. 1016, Dec. l8, 1884, p. 523-524. Renouard (.Augustin Charles). ThSorie des droits des auteurs sur les productions de leur intelligence. In "Archives de droit et de legislation." v. i. 8°. Bruxelles, 1837, p. 27-49 (of 1st pagination.) *'Cememoire a ^t6 lit k TAcad^mie des sciences mo- rales et politique^ dans la stance du 7 Janvier 1837." Rogers (H: Wade). Literary property at common law, [etc.] In " The Federal re- porter." v. 17. 8°. Saint Paul, West pub- lishing CO., 1883, no. 7, Sept. 18, p. 593-603. RosMim (Enrico). La legislazione e la giuris- prudenza del teatri e del diritti d'autore. Trattato dei diritti e delle obbligazioni degli impresari, artisti, autori delle direzioni, del pubblico, agenti teatrali, ecc, contenente le leggi, i regolaraenti e decreti, nonche le note ministeriali, i pareri del consiglio di stato, le decisioni dei tribunali e delle corti, anche straniere, in materia teatrale, e sopra i diritti degli autori d'opere drammatiche, musicali e coreografiche, coi trattati internazionali, ecc. Preceduto da introduzione storica del prof. Paolo Ferrari. 2da edizione. 2 v. c, 564P. ;782p. 8° Milano.F. Manini, 1872-73. Saunders (Robert) and Benning (W:) vs. Smith (J: W:) and Maxwell (Alexander). Copy- right in law reports. The case of Saunders v. Smith. Before the vice-chancellor [June 8th and 9th, 1838] ; and on appeal before the lord chancellor [June 22d and 23d, 1838]. With a preface, table of cases cited, notes, and an appendix. By G: Morland Crawford, vii p. 2 1. 60 p, 8°, London, A. Maxwell, 1839. Seton (Sir H: Wilmot). Forms of decrees, judgments, and orders ; with practical notes, ist American from the 4th English edition, by Franklin Fiske Heard, xvi., 862 p. 8°. Boston, Little, Brown, & co., 1884. Contains; Injunctions; section vii. Infringement 6a LITERARY PROPERTY. of copyright, p. 126-135, sec. viii. Letters and docu- ments, p. 13S-139. Shortt (J:) The law relating to works of liter- ature and art. 2d ed. About 840 p. 8°. London, Reeves & Turner, 1884. Slater (J: Herbert). The law relating to copy- right and trade marks, treated more partic- ularly with reference to infringement. Forming a digest of the more important English and American decisions, together with the practice of the English courts and forms of informations, notices, pleadings, and injunctions, xvii. p. i 1. 466 p. 8°_. London, Stevens & sons, 1884. Contents ; Copyright, p. 1-229. Trade marks, p. 230- 331. Appendix A. Forms, p. 335-354; B. Statutes, p. 355- 424. Anon, noticf : Sundry law books, in *' The Nation," V. 39. 4*'. New York, no. 1016, Dec. 18, 1884, p. 526. Switzerland. Uebereinkunft mit Deutsch- land vom 13. Mai 1869, 23. Mai 1881 be- treffend den gegenseitigen schutz des lite- rarischen und kiinstlerischen eigenthums. — Convention avec I'Allemagne du 13. Mai i86g, 23. Mai 1881 concernant la garantie r6ci- proque de la propriety litt^raire et artistique. In " Entscheidungen des Schweizerischen Bundesgerichtes aus dem jahre 1882. Amt- lichesammlung. 8. band." 8°. Lausanne, imprimerie G. Bridel, 1882, p. 762-769. Thompson (Joseph Parrish). On international copyright. (Prepared for the conference of the "Association for the reform and codi- fication of the law of nations," held at Ant- werp, August 28, 1877.) In " American com- ments on European questions, international and religious, by Joseph P. Thompson." 8°. Boston, Houghton, Mifflin & co., 1884, p. 151-167. Ueber den rechtlichen schutz gegen plagiate an literarischem und artistischem eigenthume. VerofFentlicht dutch die k. b. priv. kunst- anstalt von Piloty und Lohle in Miinchen aus anlass der von der A. H. Payne'schen kunstanstalt zu Leipzig in dem werke " Der Kunstverein IIL serie" publizirten stahl- nachstiche der gesetzlich deponirten litho- graphien jenes institutes aus den k. b. galle- rien zu Miinchen und Schleissheim, 8°, Munchen, 1853. Ueber die verhaltnisse der buchhandlung F. A. Brockhaus in Leipzig zu herrn hofrath dr. J. P. Eckermann in Weimar in beziehung auf das werk " Gesprache mit Goethe in den letzten jahren seines lebens." Aus den acten zusammengestellt und als manuskript ge- druckt. 8°. Leipzig, 1846. Unfehlbares mittel den bilchernachdruck zu verhindern ; zum besten rechtmassiger ver- leger und der schriftsteller. \Anon.'\ 4°. Tubingen, 1790. Vergara (Mariano). De la propriedad literaria, discurso leido en el acto de recibir la investi- dura de doctor en la facultad de derecho, sec- cion de derecho administrative. About 87 p. 8°. Madrid, impr. de M, Areas y Sanchez, 1862. ZALDivAR (Luis G.) Diccionario de la legis- lacion mexicana, que comprende las leyes publicadas desde el 1° de enero de 1870, hasta el 31 de diciembre de 1871. Fol. Mexico, imprenta del gobierno, a cargo de J. M. Sandoval, 1872 [i. e., 1871-74.] Contains: Propiedad literaria [Orden, Marzo i5de 1871, & Abril 23de 1871], p. 705-706. KF 299^ B78 C6 Author Bowker, Richard. Rogers Vol. Title Copyright, its xaw and its literature . Copy Date Borrower's Name IMlItJtl jtl IMjMIII 111