i no G73 BOUGHT WITH THE IIJCOME FROM THE SAGE ENDOWMENT FUND THE GIFT OF HettTQ ^. Sage 1891 .A.c/Af.3S-Q. ^3pJ4.<^-.an. 5474 Date Due 5 ii ..«?=«3 i ■3','. - , , _— rf*'^ l^^^^'^^ir^ ,^ ^^^f"^"^ ife^ -a£i-^'^ t> ' J3T^ * DP^M- x-^mM. ^ ■VilM 1 '•^- m^ ' '^^^^^^~-~.- — L'.LSli ' "«• J^AAi.:-^ -j-rHh" APSH^' ^l^*^8§8^' nT^gfcw«sJ (^^ „ Cornell University Library DT 170.G73 Roman Africa 3 1924 028 722 134 The original of tiiis book is in tine Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924028722134 ROMAN AFRICA ROMAN AFRICA ^ AN OUTLINE OF THE HISTORY OF THE ROMAN OCCUPATION OF NORTH AFRICA BASED CHIEFLY UPON INSCRIPTIONS AND MONUMENTAL REMAINS IN THAT COUNTRY BY ALEXANDER GRAHAM F.S.A., F.R.I.B.A. WITH THIRTY REPRODUCTIONS OF ORIGINAL DRAWINGS BY THE AUTHOR, AND TWO MAPS LONGMANS, GREEN, AND CO. 39 PATERNOSTER ROW, LONDON NEW YORK AND BOMBAY 1902 All rights reserved TO THE READER The inscriptions in the following pages have mostly been published in various forms and at different periods, especially during the latter half of the last century. From the time of Shaw, whose volumes were first published in 1738, so many travellers in North Africa have recorded their interpretations of inscribed lettering that it is difficult, in some cases, to assign credit where credit is due. And since the French occupation of Algeria and Tunisia opportunities have been offered of publish- ing these interpretations in many noteworthy periodicals, such as the Revue Africaine, commenced in 1856, and the Annuaire de la Sociiti archMogique de la Province de Constantine, which was issued as far back as 1853. To collate and systematise the great mass of inscriptions" has been the laborious work of such well-known epigraphists as L6on Renier, Gustavus Wilmanns, and others, whose names appear in footnotes in the following pages. Most of them can be better studied in the volumes of inscriptions mentioned on pp. 32 and 33, and referred to hereafter under the letters C.I.L. and I.R.A. Incompleteness of lettering, arising either from exposure or destruction, has given rise to difference of opinion in filling up many omissions of importance, but it is satisfactory to note that a general agreement prevails on most of the inscriptions of historic value. Whenever an alternative reading is admissible, the titles of the books that may be referred to are given in the text or in one of the footnotes. PREFACE For many generations the interest attached to the progress of civilisation in Central and Southern Africa has diverted men's minds from a somewhat analogous process which was being evolved nearly 2000 years ago in the Northern regions of this great Continent. History very often repeats itself in an un- accountable way. The methods of civilisation adopted in one age differ in a marked degree from those of another, varying with the habits of national life, and governed by the insuperable natural laws affecting climate or race. But the outcome of human progress is invariably the same, exhibiting respect for and obedience to ruling authority, a mute recognition of the unwritten rules of social life, and greater regard for personal preservation. The gradual development of North Africa as a great Roman colony was spread over a period of more than 500 years, and culminated in an era of peace and prosperity to a vast population enjoying the highest civilisation of the time. Asia and Africa took rank as the greatest of Rome's colonial possessions, and it is a question whether the latter did not take the lead, in the third and fourth centuries, in all matters affecting the maintenance of the Empire and the general welfare of its citizens. However successful Roman rule may have proved in the Asiatic provinces, we have in Africa in- disputable testimony to the wealth and resources of this fair appendage of the Empire, to the growth of municipal life, the spread of education, and the high attainments of many of its citizens iii literature, philosophy, and art. viii Roman Africa To the archaeologist no country in the world possesses greater attraction, or offers a more useful field for his re- searches, than this vast region on the southern shores of the Mediterranean, known to the ancients by the simple word Africa.^ Its long and chequered career, the rise and progress of national life, the spread of civilisation amongst hordes of barbarians whose origin still remains an unsolved problem, and the romantic lives of the chief actors in its eventful history are mainly recorded on imperishable stone or exhibited in the ruined monuments which still greet the traveller's eye on the hillsides or deserted plains of North Africa. From the borders of Egypt to the Atlantic Ocean, from the shores of the Mediterranean to the trackless plains of the Great Desert, marble and stone are there in abundance, telling their own tale of nations and communities long passed away, of deeds of heroism and benevolence, of thoughtful men and kindly women. The history of the country may truly be said to be written on stone. The untameable Libyan, the enterprising Phoenician, the crafty Carthaginian, and the indomitable Roman, followed by the destructive Vandal, the half-civilised Byzantine, and the wandering Arab, have all left enduring marks of their occupa- tion. But the mark of the Roman predominates everywhere. And interwoven with the declining years of the greatest Empire the world had yet seen we have records of the early career and struggles of the Christian Church in North Africa. For the illustration of this period there is abundant material— a period when temples and basilicas were to become the home of a new ' The Greeks, in the days of Homer, only knew of North Africa as Libya, and in the time of Herodotus would not believe that Africa had been circumnavigated by Phoenicians. The Persians, however, believed it, and it is recorded that Xerxes pardoned Sataspes, who was condemned to death, on condition that he made a voyage round Africa. Sataspes, we are told, returned quickly, ovring, as he said, to fabulous obstacles that he encountered in the Straits of Gades. Xerxes declined to accept such excuses, and ordered him to be beheaded. (L' Univers pittoresque.) The earliest mention of Africa is by the poet Ennius, B.C. 239-169, who styled himself the Homer of Latium. Suidas says that Alrica was the ancient name of Carthage itself. Preface ix Titual, when sculptured deities were to be overthrown, when symbols of a despised creed were to be carved on post and lintel, and when the names of Tertullian, St. Cyprian, and St. Augustine were to add new lustre to a country entering upon the last stages of imperial decay. From the time when the first adventurers from the Syrian coast entered the sheltered inlets of the African shore — a remote period, even before Saul was made king of Israel and while Priam sat on the throne of Troy — down to the seventh century of the Christian era, when the Arabs passed over it like a whirlwind, this fair land has been the battle-field where destinies of nations have been sealed, and where heroes and warriors have sought their last resting-place. The myths that surround its earlier development and shed a halo, of romance over the career of its primitive races are somewhat obscured by the sterner facts of later times — by wars innumerable, wars of invasion and local disturbances, succeeded by a long period of piracy and power misused, and finally by neglect, abandonment, and decay. The legend of Dido still hangs over Carthage hill, the spirit of Hannibal haunts the fateful Zama, and the banks of the Medjerda hold in everlasting memory the story of Regulus and his affrighted army. The air is full of myths and old-world stories which faithfully represent the traditions of the country in its varying fortunes ; and slight as may be their connection with events in pre-historic times, yet they serve as foundations for an historic superstructure of never-failing interest. The earlier records are fragmentary, but we learn that the library of the Carthaginians, written in Phoenician characters, was presented by the Romans, after the fall of Carthage, to the kings of Numidia ; and that Sallust, as pro- consul of that province in the time of Julius Caesar, borrowed largely from it while writing his history of the Jugurthine war. In all probability Sallust was unacquainted with either the Libyan or the Phoenician tongue (the former being the language of the primitive inhabitants of the country), and consequently X Roman Africa obtained much of his information through interpreters. More- over, he must have felt little interest in a people who had been for so many centuries the sworn enemies of Rome. Punic literature was probably limited, Greek being usually spoken by educated Carthaginians. Hannibal, we are told, wrote in Greek. There is little doubt, however, that most of the earlier records passed to Alexandria, which became the rival of Athens as a seat of learning. With the burning of its library by fanatical Arabs in the seventh century many a link between the old world and the new was severed, and reliable information concerning the laws and traditions, and the manners and customs of a people, who were the fathers of navigation and the founders of commerce, was swept away. Writers of antiquity who have recorded their impressions of North Africa are numerous enough, but their statements are not always accurate, and their descriptions of localities and monumental remains too frequently untrustworthy. Many of them derived their knowledge from various sources, especially from enterprising navigators, Phoenician or Greek, who sailed to various commercial ports on the shores of the Mediterranean. They wrote without personal knowledge of the country or its extent, and had limited acquaintance with its inhabitants or the Libyan tongue which then prevailed. Herodotus, Polybius, Sallust, Strabo, Pliny the Elder, Plutarch, and the Spanish geographer Pomponius Mela are the chief authorities down to the close of the first century.' These were followed by Suetonius, the favoured secretary and friend of the Emperor ' As an instance of looseness of statement, Strabo the geographer, in the time of Augustus, says it was the general impression that the sources of the Nile were not far off the confines of Mauritania, crocodiles and other animals found in the Nile being indigenous in the rivers of that country (lib. xvii. p. 454). Dion Cassius also sa,ys : ' I have taken particular care to inform myself about the Nile. It visibly takes its rise from Mount Atlas. This mountain, which is near the ocean on the west side, is infinitely higher than all the rest upon earth, which gave the poets occasion to feign that it supported the heavens. Never did anybody ascend to the top. The foot of this hill is marshy, and from these morasses proceeds the Nile. ' ( Vide Dion Cassius, abridged by Xiphilin, Manning's translation, 1704, vol. ii. p. 277.) Preface xi Hadrian, Apuleius of Madaura, Ptolemy the renowned geo- grapher of Alexandria, Dion Cassius the Bithynian, and Aurelius Victor, a Roman biographer of the fourth century In later times we have Procopius, the Greek secretary attached to the army of Belisarius ; Leo Africanus, an Arab of Granada in the sixteenth century ; and numerous African authors, among whom El-Bekri and El-Edrisi, who flourished in the eleventh and twelfth centuries, are the most conspicuous. Then, after a long interval, we have a succession of European travellers, whose voluminous notes paved the way for more systematic research. The most noticeable are Shaw, an Oxford divine ; Peysonnel, a professor of botany ; Bruce, British consul at Algiers ; and Sir Grenville Temple, a cavalry officer. It seems invidious to select a few names in more recent times where so many are worthy of recognition, but the labours of those who have best served the cause of archaeology, and whose names are inseparably associated with the literature and monumental remains of North Africa, cannot be passed over. The con- tributions of Berbrugger, De la Mare, Gu6rin, Ravoisi^, PelHssier, Cherbonneau, Leon Renier, and Charles Tissot in the last century, supplemented in our own days by a long array of valuable notes by our late Consul-General Sir Lambert Playfair, have added largely to our knowledge of the topography and antiquities of the country. To De la Mare we are indebted for an illustrated, though unfortunately incomplete, work on monumental Algeria ; to Ravoisi^ we owe some careful mea- surements and restorations (on paper) of the principal re- mains in the northern regions ; and to Renier, Wilmanns, and others a wealth of deciphered inscriptions which constitute in themselves a fair outline of many centuries of national life in this great Roman colony. The researches also of officers attached to the ' Bureau Arabe,' as well as the expert know- ledge of many curators of local museums, have filled up numerous gaps in the general history of Roman Africa. And in the present generation the establishment of a ' Commission xii Roman Africa des Monuments historiques ' has not only resulted in more intimate acquaintance with matters of topography, but has brought into the field of African literature many French authors of known repute. Again, the bibliography of the entire country, including Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, and Tripoli, has also been the subject of much thoughtful and enlightened labour. Some idea of the extent of the literature associated with North Africa may be gathered from the fact that the five English volumes devoted entirely to its bibliography comprise no less than 1215 pages.' The rise and progress of Roman Africa are necessarily interwoven with the history of the Roman people, and form some of its most interesting chapters during the long period which elapsed between the close of the second Punic war, B.C. 201, and the fall of Rome, A.D. 455. Gibbon's scholarly pages treating of this branch of his subject are masterpieces of erudition, and are the outcome of diligent investigation of the works of Greek and Roman authors. But he wrote at a time when archaeological inquiry was hardly recognised as a branch of knowledge, when little assistance could be given by observant travellers, who hesitated to explore a trackless region inhabited by barbarian hordes, and when the historian had to rely on his own interpretation of many conflicting statements by authors of antiquity. Mommsen has lived in a more favoured age. He has had at his disposal the notes of a long array of modern travellers and antiquaries, and has been able to correct or substantiate the statements of ancient authors by the light of recent research. It is difficult for the traveller, as he journeys across the now ' A Bibliography of Algeria. By Sir R. Lambert Playfair. Pp. 430. London : John Murray. 1888. A supplementary volume by the same author and publisher. Pp. 321. 1898. A Bibliography of Tunisia. By Henry Spencer Ashbee, F.S.A. Pp. 144. London: Dulau & Co. 1889. A Bibliography of Tripoli and the Cyrenaica. By Sir R. Lambert Playfair. Pp. 58. London : 1889. A Bibliography of Morocco. By Sir R. Lambert Playfair and Dr. Robert Brown. Pp. 262. London; John Murray. 1892. Preface xiii deserted plains of North Africa, to realise, in these far-off days, the extent and completeness of Roman colonisation. No other nation has left so many enduring marks of its presence as the Roman, and in no other country, outside Italy, is there such a wealth of inscriptions as in North Africa. Stone and marble, bearing the impress of human agency, are scattered over the land, and the familiar lettering is there also as a mute memorial to widespread contentment and prosperity. It is not within the scope of this outline of historic inquiry to trace the methods by which the Romans achieved success in colonisation where other nations have failed. This branch of the subject has proved attractive to many authors of high repute, especially in the present generation, and still presents an unexhausted field for further critical investigation. Nor does the writer of the following pages claim originality in the treatment of this subject, or any ability to impart special information not open to students of Roman history, who may care to pursue their inquiries in some of the more remote regions of Northern Africa. Notes and observations during frequent journeys in various parts of the country,' and a study of the inscriptions and monumental remains of the Roman occupation, have supplied a large proportion of the material embodied in this volume. Archaeology is the willing handmaid of history. Without such help the history of the Romans in Africa would be less attractive, and our acquaintance with their progress and decline more fragmentary. Every week the spade of the explorer contributes something to our knowledge ; either some undiscovered monument on the plains, or an inscribed stone to tell its own unvarnished tale of place or person long passed away. The chief aim of the present work is to trace as far as possible the extent of the Roman occupation, the degree of civilisation attained in the first four centuries of the Christian era, and to show how conspicuous a part was played by North Africa in the building up of a great Empire. ' Travels in Tunisia. By Alexander Graham and Henry Spencer Ashbee. London : 1887. CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE I. Carthage and Rome. b.c. 201-46 i II. Africa under the C^sars. b.c. 46-A.D. 96 . III. Africa under Trajan, a.d. 97-117 IV. Africa under Hadrian, a.d. 117-138 V. Africa under Antoninus Pius. a.d. 138-161 . VI. Africa under Marcus Aurelius. a.d. 161-180 VII. Africa under Septimius Severus. a.d. 193-21 i VIII. Africa under Alexander Severus. a.d. 222-235. IX. Africa under the Gordians. a.d. 236-244 X. Africa under the later Emperors, a.d. 244-454 Conclusion 19 55 103 120 15s 196 209 220 235 297 APPENDICES. I. List of Abbreviations usually found in Roman Inscrip- tions . . . 309 II. List of the principal known To v^^ns in the African Provinces of the Roman Empire, or the Sites of others which have been identified by Inscriptions. 311 III. Chronology OF the Principal Events in North Africa during the Roman Occupation and, subsequently, till the Invasion of the Country by Arabs . . 316 INDEX 321 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS The Three Temples at Sufetula (Sbeitla), restored FronHspiece View of Utica (Bou Chater) To face p. 22 Mosaic in the British Museum, representing the Walls of Roman Carthage ,,24 Tomb of Juba II „ 27 Plan of Tomb of Juba II „ 28 Entrance to Tomb of Juba II „ 29 Tombs of Numidian Kings, restored >, 3° Plan of Basilica at Theveste (Tebessa) . . . . „ 46 The Quadrifrontal Arch of Caracalla at Theveste „ 48 Temple of Minerva at Theveste, restored . . . „ 50 View of Bulla Regia (HammAm Darradji). . . . „ 71 Trajan's Bridge at Simittu (Chemtou) . . . . „ 72 Monument at Scillium (Kasserin) „ 81 Arch of Trajan at Thamugas (Timegad), restored . „ 96 Aqueduct of Carthage ...,....„ 109 Cisterns outside Kairouan „ iii Aqueduct of Carthage in the Medjerda Plain, SHOWING Construction ,,114 View of Mount Zaghouan „ 116 Entrance to the Hieron at Sufetula . . . . „ 122 The Bridge at Sufetula (Sbeitla) ,,127 View of Sufetula (Sbeitla) ,,128 The Capitol at Thugga (Dougga) ,,171 The Pr^torium at Lamb^sis (Lambessa) . . . . „ 186 Amphitheatre at Thvsdrus (El-Djem) . . . . „ 228 j> »» >) )» **••»» 230 The Four Principal Amphitheatres compared . . 232, 233 Amphitheatre at Uthina (Oudena) „ 234 Front of a Marble Cippus in the Museum at Philippe- VILLE ,,296 Mosaic Slab in the Museum at Constantine (Byzantine Period) „ 308 MAPS North Africa To face p. 4 North Africa at the Close qf the Third Century . At end ROMAN AFRICA CHAPTER I CARTHAGE AND ROME Errata Page lo, line i6, _/^ historian r«a,/ historians „ 212, last line but one, /or Julia Domna yeaoT Bassianus and dismay. Success to the Romans on the first encounter oil land mattered little to a maritime people like the Carthaginians, whose fleets were to be found in every port and inlet of the Mediterranean, and who reigned supreme as the one commercial people of the known world. The career of these ancient rulers of North Africa, illustrious from their spirit of adventure, unflagging energy, and wondrous commerce, is a chapter of romance. Hemmed in originally between mountain and sea on the Syrian coast, a little colony of Phoenicians spread itself in a comparatively short period along the whole seaboard of the Mediterranean ; then passing the Pillars of Hercules it reached Sierra Leone in the south, eastward it touched the coast of Malabar, and northward skirted the inhospitable shores of the German Ocean. It seems strange that these Canaanites or Phcenicians, the scorn of Israel, and the people against whom Joshua bent all his powers, should have enjoyed such an LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS The Three Temples at Sufetula (Sbeitla), restored Frontispiece View of Utica (Bou Chater) To face p. iz Mosaic in the British Museum, representing the Walls of Roman Carthage ,24 Tomb of Juba II , „ 27 Plan of Tomb of Juba II ,,28 Entrance to Tomb of Juba II „ 29 Tombs of Numidian Kings, restored ,,30 Plan of Basilica at Theveste (Tebessa) . . . . „ 46 The Quadrifrontal Arch of Caracalla at Theveste „ 48 Temple of Minerva at Theveste, restored . . , „ 50 1 mz> uKiuiyir AT aUFETULA (^SBEITLA) „ 127 View of Sufetula (Sbeitla) ,,128 The Capitol at Thugga (Dougga) ,,171 The PrjEtorium at Lamb^esis (Lambessa) . . . . ,,186 Amphitheatre at Thysdrus (El-Djem) . . . . „ 228 )> )> )) )) • * • • ij 230 The Four Principal Amphitheatres compared . . 232, 233 Amphitheatre at Uthina (Oudena) „ 234 Front of a Marble Cippus in the Museum at Philippe- ville „ 296 Mosaic Slab in the Museum at Constantine (Byzantine Period) • >, 308 MAPS North Africa To face p. 4 North Africa at the Close of the Third Century . At end ROMAN AFRICA CHAPTER I CARTHAGE AND ROME B.C. 201-46 The history of Roman Africa commences at the close of the second Punic war, B.C. 201. The fall of Pyrrhus, the adven- turous king of Epirus, B.C. 272, whose ambition was to surpass Alexander the Great in warlike achievements, had made the Romans masters of Southern Italy, and brought them face to face with the Carthaginians in the fair island of Sicily. For nearly two centuries and a half these rival nations had been watching each other's movements across the sea with jealousy and dismay. Success to the Romans on the first encounter oil land mattered little to a maritime people like the Carthaginians, whose fleets were to be found in every port and inlet of the Mediterranean, and who reigned supreme as the one commercial people of the known world. The career of these ancient rulers of North Africa, illustrious from their spirit of adventure, unflagging energy, and wondrous commerce, is a chapter of romance. Hemmed in originally between mountain and sea on the Syrian coast, a little colony of Phoenicians spread itself in a comparatively short period along the whole seaboard of the Mediterranean ; then passing the Pillars of Hercules it reached Sierra Leone in the south, eastward it touched the coast of Malabar, and northward skirted the inhospitable shores of the German Ocean. It seems strange that these Canaanites or Phoenicians, the scorn of Israel, and the people against whom Joshua bent all his powers, should have enjoyed such an *. B LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS ■The Three Temples at Sufetula (Sbeitla), restored Frontispiece View of Utica (Bou Chater) To face p. 22 Mosaic in the British Museum, representing the Walls of Roman Carthage ,,24 Tomb of Juba II , „ 27 Plan of Tomb of Juba II „ 28 Entrance to Tomb of Juba II ,,29 Tombs of Numidian Kings, restored >, 3° Plan of Basilica at Theveste (Tebessa) . . . . „ 46 The Quadrifrontal Arch of Caracalla at Theveste „ 48 Temple of Minerva at Theveste, restored . . , „ 50 .^-.„^ uRiuv^E. AT 3D'FEn3TrA""('SBETTE*A)"- . . \ View of Sufetula (Sbeitla) The Capitol at Thugga (Dougga) .... The Pr^torium at Lamb^esis (Lambessa) . Amphitheatre at Thvsdrus (El-Djem) . » »j J) >» ... The Four Principal Amphitheatres compared Amphitheatre at Uthina (Oudena) .... Front of a Marble Cippus in the Museum at Philippe VILLE Mosaic Slab in the Museum at Constantine (Byzantine Period) 127 128 3» )1 171 186 228 »» 230 232 233 )) 234 f> 296 3> 308 MAPS North Africa To face p. 4 North Africa at the Close or the Third Century . At end ROMAN AFRICA CHAPTER I CARTHAGE AND ROME B.C. 201-46 The history of Roman Africa commences at the close of the second Punic war, B.C. 201. The fall of Pyrrhus, the adven- turous king of Epirus, B.C. 272, whose ambition was to surpass Alexander the Great in warlike achievements, had made the Romans masters of Southern Italy, and brought them face to face with the Carthaginians in the fair island of Sicily. For nearly two centuries and a half these rival nations had been watching each other's movements across the sea with jealousy and dismay. Success to the Romans on the first encounter ori land mattered little to a maritime people like the Carthaginians, whose fleets were to be found in every port and inlet of the Mediterranean, and who reigned supreme as the one commercial people of the known world. The career of these ancient rulers of North Africa, illustrious from their spirit of adventure, unflagging energy, and wondrous commerce, is a chapter of romance. Hemmed in originally between mountain and sea on the Syrian coast, a little colony of Phoenicians spread itself in a comparatively short period along the whole seaboard of the Mediterranean ; then passing the Pillars of Hercules it reached Sierra Leone in the south, eastward it touched the coast of Malabar, and northward skirted the inhospitable shores of the German Ocean. It seems strange that these Canaanites or Phoenicians, the scorn of Israel, and the people against whom Joshua bent all his powers, should have enjoyed such an fe . B 2 Roman Africa unchecked career, making themselves sole navigators of every sea, and finally founding a city which stood unrivalled for more than 700 years. Through their hands, as Mommsen has observed, passed grain, ivory, and skins from Libya, slaves from the Soudan, purple and cedar from Tyre, frankincense from Arabia, copper from Cyprus, iron from Elba, tin from Cornwall, wine from Greece, silver from Spain, and gold and precious stones from Malabar. As a nation of traders and navigators they established themselves on the coast, and wherever they settled depots and factories of various kinds were erected. We do not find them in the interior of a country. Neither do we hear of alliances with the people with whom they came into contact, nor of their impressing barbarian tribes with any notions of the advantages of civilisation. In the field of intellectual acquirements the Carthaginian, as the descendant of the Phoenician, has no place, and his skill in the gentler arts of life has no recognition. We find no native architecture, nor do we hear of any industrial art worth recording. Carthage, it is true, became the metro- polis of their widespread kingdom, and one of the wealthiest cities of the world. But this was due, in a great measure, to its central position, and its convenience as an outlet for the vast produce of North Africa. Temples and stately edifices adorned its streets, and the remains of great constructional works still attest the solid grandeur of the city. But the architecture was the work of Greek, and not of Punic, artists ; and the few sculptures of note, which may be assigned to a period anterior to the last Punic war, have nothing in common with the rude carvings which bear the impress of Carthaginian origin. On the other hand the art of navigation, the science of agriculture, the principles of trading, and a system of water supply combined with the construction of gigantic cisterns, which may still be seen at Carthage and on the outskirts of many towns in North Africa, became Rome's heritage from Phoenicia. The distinguish- ing characteristic of Phoenician architecture, or rather of building construction, is its massive and imposing strength, singularly deficient in fineness of detail, as M. Renan has observed, but with a general effect of power and grandeur. The few Phoenician buildings existing are constructed with immense blocks of stone, such as the ramparts of Aradus, the foundations of the temple at Jerusalem, and the earlier portions of the great temple at Baalbec. Carthage and Rome 3 From the day when the two nations crossed arms in the vicinity of Syracuse a kind of fatality hung over them. It seemed as if there were no room in the world for two such ambi- tious rivals ; and that, the struggle having once commenced, it should continue till one or the other ceased to exist. The want of an efficient fleet to enable them to do battle with the Carthaginians in their own element preyed heavily upon the Romans in their Sicilian campaign. But Rome was not dis- couraged. With that strength of will which always charac- terised her people, she set to work to create a navy. In sixty days, we are told, a forest of timber was cut down, and 140 galleys, fully manned and provisioned, sailed out under M. Attilius Regulus to attack the Carthaginian fleet on their own coasts.^ This intrepid general, inspired by the temporary success of Agathocles ^ the Sicilian, in his invasion of Cartha- ginian territory, contemplated a similar adventure. He captured more than 200 towns and villages and, landing Italian troops for the first time on African soil, paved the way for a more permanent occupation which was to take place after the lapse of nearly 100 years.^ Then came the close of the first Punic war. Carthage retreated. All Sicily, except the little kingdom of Syracuse, then wisely governed by the renowned Hiero II., was abandoned to the Romans. Sardinia, which the Cartha- ' Polybius, i. 66. The Romans began to build ships (or rather coasting vessels) B. c. 338, and seventy years later the maritime services had assumed such importance that four quaestors of the fleet, stationed at different ports of Italy, were appointed. This provoked the jealousy of Carthage, whose supremacy at sea had for so long a period remained undisputed. (Rawlinson's Manual of Ancient History.) The Romans occupied the old Phoenician ports on the coast of Africa, and did not attempt, till a much later period, to form any new ones. ^ Agathocles, an adventurous Sicilian and tyrant of Syracuse, invaded North Africa B.C. 306 and nearly ruined Carthage, either destroying or taking possession of nearly all the towns. Recalled to Sicily, he left the war in the hands of his son Archagathus, who was unsuccessful. The Carthaginians regained all they had lost. The army of Agathocles consisted of 6,000 Greeks, about the same number of European mercenaries, 10,000 Libyan allies, and 1,500 horse. [V Univers pittoresque.) ' There is nothing on record, to indicate that the Roman people, so little accustomed to maritime warfare and with a superstitious dread of the sea, encouraged so hazardous an undertaking. Regulus followed the banks of the Bagradas, laid siege to Uthina, and subsequently took Tunis. The Carthaginians engaged Greek mercenaries, led by Xantippus the Lacedemonian, who brought the war to a close. The Romans were defeated, and their fleet destroyed by a tempest. Polybius (i. 66) says that the Romans had 330 galleys and 140,000 men, and that the Carthaginian fleet consisted of 350 galleys and 115,000 men. B 2 4 Roman Africa ginians had held for 400 years, shared the same fate. Peace was declared, or rather a respite was agreed upon by the two rivals, utterly wearied and worn out by continuous warfare of twenty years, preparatory only to a trial of strength on a more extended scale. The twenty-three years' interval of watchful unrest which preceded the outbreak of the second Punic war was among the most eventful in the whole history of the struggle. It is this period, prior to the renewal of hostilities when the fate of Carthage and her people was to be decided, which is peculiarly attractive, partly on account of the events that preceded the fall of a great nation, and partly from the dramatic career of the chief native rulers of Africa. In order to form an idea of the vast extent and litnits of Africa of the ancient world, it is necessary to glance at a map of the southern shores of the Mediterranean, to note how the country was then divided, and to sketch, as briefly as possible, the history of the tribes who contributed by their endless rivalries to hasten the Roman occupation of the entire region. Commencing westward of Cyrene ' (a Greek colony founded about B.C. 630, and though afterwards part of the Roman Empire yet never recognised as part of North Africa) we come to Africa proper, the little corner afterwards known as Africa Provincia, of which the capital was Carthage.^ Westward of this was the country of a people whom Greeks and Romans were accustomed to call Nomades or Numidians, divided between the Massylians on the east and the Masssesylians on the west. Beyond was the land of the Mauri, stretching round the shores of the, Atlantic. Now all this vast region, from Cyrene to the Atlantic, with a seaboard of not less than 2,000 miles, had been for many centuries under the control of Carthage, furnishing large bodies of troops in time of war and contributing to the preservation of the kingdom of their enterprising masters. ' Cyrene was founded by Greeks from the island of Thera, one of the Sporades group in the i^gean Sea, now called Santorin. It became the capital of the region known as Pentapolis, whose five cities were Cyrene, Apollonia, Ptolemais, Arsinoe, and Berenice. 2 Sallust divides North Africa into four regions : (l) Cyrenaica and the country of the Syrtes, the modern Barca : Tripoli, with the Fezzan in the interior ; (2) the territory of Carthage, now known as Tunisia ; (3) Numidia, now corresponding to Algeria ; and (4) Mauritania, the modern Morocco. ( Vide Vivien de Saint- Martin, JVord de PAfrique dans I'antiquiti. ) Carthage and Rome 5 The boundaries of Punic territory appear to have been determined at a very remote period, when the neighbouring country of Cyrene had attained power and prosperity, and when the tribes of North Africa had recognised the supremacy of the Phoenician colony settled at Carthage. The river Tusca, sepa- rating Carthage on the west from the land of the Massylii, formed a natural boundary. The borders of the Desert were also a natural boundary on the south, peopled at all times, even at the present day, by numerous tribes wandering from place to place and living in incessant rivalry.^ But the limitation of the eastern frontier, separating the Carthaginians from the Greek colony of Cyrene, did not admit of easy solution. No river or watercourse was there to mark the line of territory. No fortress or earthwork had been raised in testimony of a settlement of ancient claims. Nothing was there but shifting tracts of sand and an undefined coastline. Physical force was at last resorted to for the purpose of deciding a long-pending controversy, not the force of arms or skill with weapons, but strength of limb and endurance in a long and harassing journey. And this was the simple expedient. Two deputies on either side, probably athletes, were to leave home at a given hour, and the spot where they met should be the boundary between the two States. The names of two brothers, deputies on the Carthaginian side, are recorded ; but those despatched from Cyrene have not been handed down. Neither have we any description of the race, or circumstances attending the journey. All we know is that the spot where the race terminated is designated in most charts of the ancient world as Philcenorum Arcz, and we are told that the Cyrenians, having covered but a small distance compared with their opponents, accused them of having started before the time agreed upon. Like many a school- boy, who is worsted in a youthful encounter, they endeavoured to account for their defeat by imputing to their adversaries that ' The country in the south between Mount Atlas and the Sahara, as far as the Niger, was inhabited by the Getuli and Melanogetuli, the Moslem Tuariks, or, as they are now called, Touaregs. (Niebuhr's Lectures.) Pliny also speaks of the inhabitants of the south as Getulians. They are a distinct people in African ethnology. Owing to their geographical position they were not subject to external influences. Their neighbours, the Garamantes, who occupied the country south of Tripoli as far as Ghadames, may be classed with them. ( Vide Tissot, Geogr. comparh de VAfrique, i. 447. ) The limits of the country occupied by either of them are not known. 6 Roman Africa they had not played fair. A quarrel ensued, but the Philaeni brothers, as the representatives of Carthage, stood firm, rooted, as it were, to the spot. To end the dispute without resorting to arms, the men of Cyrene said, ' You shall be buried alive on the spot which you claim as the boundary for your people, or we, on the same condition, shall be allowed to proceed on our journey to whatever point we may think proper.' The Philaeni, it is said, accepted the terms imposed upon them, and, sacrificing themselves in the interest of their country, were forthwith buried alive. If we are to assume that the Carthaginians started from CarthUge and the Greeks from the city of Cyrene, the whole story may be regarded as a fable, for the two mounds that once marked the legendary spot are not midway, but about seven- ninths the distance between the alleged starting-points. We may be permitted to suppose that the wind favoured the Philaeni, and that a sand-storm, such as is prevalent in those parts, blew into the faces of their opponents and retarded their progress. To give the tale an appearance of reality we may imagine that the Carthaginians started from Leptis ^ and not from Carthage, for the mounds or altars consecrated to these heroic brothers were nearly midway between that city and Cyrene. Now Leptis was, at that period, a city of wealth and magnitude, and took rank with Utica as one of the chief Phoenician colonies. Founded by Sidonians in a prehistoric age, it grew into importance long before Carthage had attained the climax of its prosperity, and was regarded by the Car- thaginians as one of their choicest possessions. Whether this old-world story of the Philaeni is to be read in the light of a fable, or is based upon some incident in the settlement of a long- disputed boundary, matters little after a lapse of more than 2,500 years. The historian and the geographer have accepted the legend, and honoured it with a place in their records which time will never obliterate. But whether true or not we may receive the narrative in the form in which it has been handed down. It is good for us to think that the spirit of patriotism inspired men, in the old world as in the new, in the exercise of ' Leptis Magna, now Lebda, was one of the earliest Phoenician settlements in Africa. The fertility of the soil favoured colonisation, and the inhabitants, under Roman rule, were allowed to retain their old laws and customs. Commercial intercourse and intermarriage with Numidians forced them to alter their language and to adopt the Numidian tongue. (Sallust, /«^. Ixxviii.) Carthage and Rome 7 heroic deeds, and that self-sacrifice in a country's honour has never been found wanting in the hour of need.^ The territory occupied by Carthaginians formed only a small portion of North Africa, as we have already observed. At the time of the Roman invasion, which may be regarded as the open- ing of the last chapter in the history of the second Punic war, the country west of Carthage was under the rule of Gala, the tribes beyond being governed by Syphax, the most powerful of African kings at that period. The rivalry of these two poten- tates and their wavering policy contributed largely to the success of the Romans in the impending war. It was impossible for both these kings to form simultaneous alliances with either Roman or Carthaginian. Traditional policy seems to have in- spired them with perpetual animosity ; and so soon as it was known that one favoured the invading Roman, the other imme- diately, without any settled line of action or forecast of the con- sequences, formed an alliance with the Carthaginian. Both were jealous of the supremacy of Carthage, and both awaited the coming of the Roman that they might eventually participate in spoiling the Carthaginians. Syphax was at first inimical to Carthage, and subsequently a friend in an hour of need. But he changed sides again and made a treaty with Publius Scipio, who commanded the invading force. The conditions were the sup- port and good will of the Roman Senate and people in exchange for his assistance in the field of battle. A small embassy, con- sisting of three centurions, was despatched from Rome with instructions to remain in Africa till a formal treaty was con- cluded with this potent but wayward Numidian. Syphax was flattered by the attention, entertained the ambassadors with princely hospitality, and requested that one of the centurions should be allowed to instruct his soldiers in the Roman methods of warfare. ' Numidians,' he said, ' are only horsemen. They know nothing about infantry. Teach them.' The request was complied with, and bodies of Numidians, drilled after the manner of Roman infantry, were at once formed for the purpose of defeating Carthage in the plains when the next war broke ' Strabo says that a tower called Euphrantas was the boundary between CjTene and Carthaginian territory. The altars of the Philseni were a little to the east of this. They fell to ruin about B.C. 350. These mounds or altars, if they ever existed, may have had some resemblance to the tombs of the two Horatii near Alba, erected B.C. 673-640. These had s. podium or wall of stone surmounted by a cone of earth. 8 Roman Africa out. Carthage was thunderstruck at these proceedings, and, nothing daunted, sent envoys to King Gala, who responded in a spirit of friendship, and at once entered into an alliance, offensive and defensive, more for the purpose of crushing his old antagonist Syphax than of maintaining the integrity of the Punic kingdom. Now Gala had a son who had just attained his seventeenth year when the embassy was despatched. This fearless youth, who lives in history as Masinissa, the hero of Numidia, was a warrior from his cradle. Without hesitation he seized the first opportunity of offering battle to Syphax. Not once only but twice he defeated him, but on the third occasion his rival was victorious. To commemorate his success over so redoubtable a warrior as Masinissa, Syphax vowed eternal friendship with Rome. Forthv/ith ambassadors were despatched to Italy, and in return officers of state were sent by the Roman Senate to his capital at Cirta, bearing costly presents of various kinds, including a toga, a purple tunic, an ivory throne, and a gold cup. But Syphax's happiness was of short duration. In an evil hour he fell in love with Sophonisba, the fair daughter of Hasdrubal, the Carthaginian general, and, to prove his affection for the country of his bride, thoughtlessly deserted the Roman alliance, and quartered his army in the opposing camp. This step was not lost on Masinissa, who immediately favoured the Rgman cause and encamped his troops with the army of Scipio. Such a powerful alliance laid the foundation of Masinissa's for- tune, and to his credit it should be said that throughout a long career he never swerved from the attachment, but remained to the close of his active life a loyal friend to Rome. The sad story of Sophonisba is soon told. On the defeat of Syphax by the all-conquering Masinissa, the victor hastened to take posses- sion of Cirta, the capital and stronghold of his rival. At the gates he was met by the unfortunate queen, whose love and beauty had tempted the amorous Syphax to commit an act of the grossest perfidy. On bended knees and with tearful eye she im- plored the conqueror not to suffer her to fall into the hands of the Romans, dreading the fate that might befall her as a captive in the streets of Rome. Love and pity combined sealed her fate. Masinissa, we are told, was so struck with the beauty of Sophonisba that he sent her to his camp, and, with that im- petuosity which characterises Orientals in their relations with the Carthage and Rome 9 fair sex, married her forthwith. But love and pity had, in this case, a direful termination. Masinissa was summoned before Scipio for having taken to wife the daughter of their sworn enemy, the Carthaginian general. It may be that the Roman desired to claim Sophonisba for himself as part of the spoils of war, but history is silent on this point. All we know is that Scipio, regarding her presence in the camp as a stumbling-block to success, demanded her immediate dismissal. Such was Masinissa's dread of the exercise of Roman authority that he dared not disobey. With a tearful face he entered Sophonisba's tent, and, telling her he was powerless to deliver her from the jealousy of the Romans or the dread captivity that might befall her, besought this ill-fated bride, in pledge of his love for her and her person, to die in the manner worthy of the daughter of Hasdrubal. Silently and unmoved Sophonisba obeyed, and swallowed the poison which Masinissa ordered to be conveyed to her tent at the close of their interview.' The success of Scipio, aided by his brilliant Numidian ally, had placed Carthage in sore distress. Syphax was taken prisoner to Italy, and soon closed his career ingloriously. The fleet, which had once reigned supreme, was of little service, and the army, largely composed of mercenaries, was sadly reduced in numbers and without a reliable commander. An armistice was agreed upon, and the conditions imposed by Scipio, heavy as they may seem to modern ideas, were accepted. Carthage had to surrender her territories in Spain and her island posses- sions in the Mediterranean, to hand over all her war vessels ex- cept twenty ships, to pay a money fine equivalent to nearly one million sterling, and finally to transfer to Masinissa the kingdom of his adversary Syphax. The events which followed, termi- nating on the fatal day when Scipio and Masinissa were to crush the Carthaginian army on the plain of Zama, and to close the career of one of the greatest generals in ancient or modern times, ' Corneille's dramatised version of this tragic story is little in accord with the statements of ancient authors. The Sophonisba of the stage had been married by Hasdrubal her father to Masinissa, but the Carthaginians, ignoring this husband, married her afresh to Syphax. Such was her affection for him that she declined to forsake his cause, although he had been twice defeated, and was prepared to bury herself with him in the ruins of his capital, even if he had suffered defeat a third time. Her attachment to her country was no less sincere than her avowed hatred of Rome. lo Roman Africa have been so ably described by historians of all ages from Livy to Mommsen that they need only brief recapitulation in these pages. But it should be observed that the rise of Numidia at this period, as a powerful nationality under such a potentate as Masinissa, introduces a new factor in the history of Roman Africa. For fifty years Numidia is destined to play a leading part in the affairs of the country, and to contribute in a larger measure to the ultimate success of Roman arms than Latin historians are wont to acknowledge. It might be thought that researches in recent years, coupled with the diligent investiga- tions of so many learned archaeologists, would have thrown additional light on this period of African history, and cleared up many doubtful points in ancient records. But neither stone nor marble has yet been unearthed to tell its own unvar- nished tale, nor has any writer succeeded in refuting the de- scriptive account by our great Roman historian^of the last pitched battle between Carthage and Rome. The recall of Hannibal, who for thirty-six years had not set foot on his native land, and who was then devastating the plains of Italy and threatening Rome with destruction, was the signal for Rome and her allies to prepare for battle. Scipio and his army were then encamped in the valley of the Bagradas, not far from Carthage. Hannibal, who had landed at Hadrumetum, was arranging his forces, and securing, by the magic of his name, the aid of the tribes who had recently fought under the banner of Syphax. The opposing armies met at Zama, which was then a large city and stronghold of the king of Numidia, and con- tinued to remain so at a later period. Sallust informs us that it was built on a plain, and was better fortified by art than by nature. The same authority tells us that the city existed as the bulwark of that part of the kingdom a century after the battle, for Metellus, the Roman commander, laid siege to it during the Jugurthine war. We also read of it as Zama regia, the capital of Juba I. in the time of Julius Caesar. It is difficult, after a lapse of more than 2,000 years, to mark the exact site of the city, for destruction and neglect have left no tangible remains. The geography of Ptolemy, the chart of Peutinger, and the Itinerary of Antoninus where distances are given, form the only clue to the position of the battlefield, which appears to have been between the towns of El-Kef, Taoura, and Kalaat-es- Carthage and Rome ii Saan. Bruce, who traversed the country in 1766, says that in proceeding in a north-easterly direction after leaving Zanfour, and traversing the plain a distance of twelve miles, ' we came to Djebel Mesaood, ■on the other side of which upon an eminence is a small town built from the fragments of a larger and ancient one, whose name is still called Zama, and was probably the ancient capital of Juba I.' So decisive a victory enabled the Roman general to name the conditions of peace. Had Scipio been prompted to subject Carthage to the same fate that only a few years previously Hannibal had desired to inflict on Rome, there was nothing to prevent him. He granted peace, but on heavy conditions. Carthage was to pay, in addition to the penalties previously enforced, a sum of money equivalent to 48,000/. sterling annually for a term of fifty years, and not to engage in arms with Rome or her allies, either in Africa or else- where, without the permission of Rome. It was not without grave discussion in the Senate, or the expression of many con- flicting opinions, that these conditions were agreed to. As usual on such momentous occasions, when the very existence of a nation trembles in the balance, there was a peace party and a war party. The former, headed by Scipio, whose valour was only equalled by his magnanimity, prevailed. Carthage was allowed to exist for another fifty years as a tributary of Rome. But the ill-fated city was doomed to a long period of unrest and disturbance as soon as the treaty was signed and the Roman army had been withdrawn. The adversary was no longer the Roman but the powerful Numidian, who had con- tributed so largely to her defeat on the decisive field of Zama. There is no name in African records which is so conspicuous, or exercised so extraordinary an influence on the career of Numidia and its people, as that of Masinissa. Fearless in action, a steadfast friend or a merciless foe, unscrupulous and of unbounded ambi- tion, this powerful chieftain ruled for more than sixty years over a conglomeration of tribes who knew no will but his, and recog- nised his authority as though he were a god from Olympus. In the whole range of ancient history there was no one ever invested with kingly power who enjoyed such a career of unchequered good fortune as this remarkable man. Sober in habit and, after the manner of his race, never drinking anything but water, his physical powers were extraordinary. Riding without saddle, 12 Roman Africa sometimes for twenty-four consecutive hours, and jumping on his horse like an athlete, even after he had atttained his ninetieth year, there is little wonder'that history should have claimed him as the hero of Numidia. Generous in disposition, a firm ruler, and skilled in the crafty statesmanship of his time, he was free from crimes so common among uncivilised tribes. Of his domestic life we have no record, but we are told that he had forty-four children, and at his death, when he had passed his ninetieth year, his youngest son was only four years old. But his boundless activity proved disastrous to Carthage, and in later years contributed to the downfall of his own kingdom. So restless a spirit could not remain satisfied with the large terri- tory which Rome had transferred to him. The policy of Rome was to preserve antagonism between Carthage and Numidia and to give tacit encouragement to Masinissa in his encroach- ments upon Carthaginian territory. Not content with appro- priating the rich lands which lay in the upper valley of the Bagradas, to which he had no legal claim, he must needs occupy the old Sidonian city of Leptis Magna in Tripoli, and ultimately hem in the Carthaginian within the tract of country now repre- sented by Tunisia. There is little doubt that, if opportunity had offered to shake off the Roman yoke without a disturbance of friendly relations, this enterprising Numidian would have occu- pied Carthage and made it the capital of an extended kingdom. So irritating a procedure, which continued for nearly forty years, became at last unbearable to a people who, in spite of all their shortcomings as a governing power, and their absence of respect for treaties with other countries, desired only to exist peacefully as a commercial nation, and to carry on unrestricted trade in every part of the world. An appeal to Rome was at first dis- regarded. Subsequently commissioners were despatched to Carthage by the Senate for the purpose of settling the long- pending disputes, and to determine the boundaries of Carthage and Numidia, but without result. Carthage was exasperated, and, not being able to make terms with either friend or foe, took the field against Masinissa, and on the first encounter suffered defeat. This action, being in direct contravention of the treaty entered into after the defeat of Hannibal, gave the Romans a pretext for declaration of war. It is but just to the Cartha- ginians to observe that the sacrifices they were prepared to Carthage and Rome 13 make to avert a conflict were unlimited in respect of ships, war material of all kinds, and personal weapons. But the decree of the Senate and people of Rome was irresistible. Carthage must be destroyed, and the city must cease to exist. The events which followed the issue of this terrible edict, terminating the third and last Punic war and erasing the metropolis of the Phoenician world from the book of nations, are too well known to need recapitulation.' They form the last chapters of African history prior to the Roman occupation. In the opening paragraph of this chapter it was said that the history of Roman Africa commences with the close of the second Punic war, B.C. 201 ; and, in support of this assertion, it may be fairly added that, till the fall of Hannibal and the recognition of Carthage and Numidia as powerful States subject to the will of Rome, Africa held no place in the Roman mind as a country adapted either for the establishment of military strongholds or for the future settlement of a civil population. To keep Carthage in subjection, to destroy her fleet, and to force her to supply the Roman army with money and provisions, seem to have met the immediate requirements of the Senate. Continuous wars in other parts of the world had decimated the Italian army, and caused sad havoc in the ranks of the male population. Colonisation on any organised plan was not even contemplated, nor do we hear of any attempt, so far as African possessions were concerned, till Julius Caesar set the example. It is true that inhabitants of Rome and of the Italian provinces, prompted by a love of change and adventure, had migrated to towns on the African coast, and had even located themselves at Cirta, the capital of Numidia. But they were not the repre- sentatives of any organised system. All we know is, that when Jugurtha laid siege to the town, B.C. 107, he found it mainly defended by Italians, who were put to death by his orders on the surrender of the place.^ Indeed, after the destruc- tion of Carthage, when the ploughshare had passed over the site, and merchants from Italy crossed the Mediterranean in search of new fields for commercial enterprise, we hear of little ' To use the words of Polybius, the Carthaginians, at the suddenness of their fall, perished from off the face of the earth. Their annihilation as a people made them insensible of their misfortunes. The whole subject is admirably treated in Mr. R. Bosworth Smith's Carthage and the Carthaginians, London, 1877. ' Sallust,y«^. xxvi. 14 Roman Africa movement in the direction of permanent settlement in the newly acquired country. It satisfied the Roman Senate to take actual possession of the diminished territory of the Carthaginians, extending from the river Tusca in the north (now known as the Oued-ez-Zan, River of Oak-trees, or Oued-el-Kebir, the Great River) to Thenae on the south-east (the modern Zina, not far from Sfax), and to appoint a Roman governor, whose head- quarters were to be at Utica. In order to define the boundary of this territory, a ditch was cut round it on the land frontier, extending from Thabraca in the north to Thense on the coast. Towns and villages, which had shown loyalty to the Cartha- ginians, were razed to the ground, and the inhabitants sold as slaves. Confiscated lands were divided into three classes. The first became the property of the State, who let it to the inhabitants on payment of rent, or to censors who farmed the revenues. The second was sold to adventurous individuals, giving rise to the formation of extensive latifundia, and laying the foundation of a system of land-grabbing which excited the ire of Horace, Pliny, and other writers.' The third was at first held by the State, but was subsequently apportioned to the colonists of Caius Gracchus. It is stated on reliable authority^ that no less than six thousand indigent persons, including women and children, were shipped to Carthage from Rome and the Italian provinces by this intrepid demagogue. So noble an enterprise, conducted at a time when colonisation was unknown, has given the name of Gracchus a place in history, for having established on a proper basis the principles of emigration beyond the sea. This benevolent undertaking was not attended with immediate beneficial results, and gave little encouragement to a furtherance of the scheme on a larger scale. So slow, indeed, was the progress of colonisation that, as a recent writer has observed,' it was not seriously commenced till two years after the battle of Actium, B.C. 29. ' The idea was one which Caesar and his successors inherited from the democratic party, and of which the restoration of Carthage and Corinth by the dictator were the first-fruits. The objections felt to any Such ' Horace, Carm. i. i, 10, iii. 16, 31 ; Pliny, Hist. Nat. xviii. 6 ; Frontinus, Geom. p. 53. " Appian, Bella Civil, i. 24 ; Plutarch, C. Gracchus, 10, 14. ' J. Toutain, Les Cith Romaines de la Tunisie, p. 27. Carthage and Rome 15 scheme of colonisation were founded on foolish jealousy and a fear of creating possible rivals to the world-ruling Romans.' ' The short period of rest, resulting from a more peaceful atti- tude of the native tribes, enabled the Romans to establish them- selves securely at Utica, and to construct fortified posts on the line of frontier. But it soon came to an end. The kingdom of Numidia, which had been powerful and united under the firm rule of the great Masinissa, was destined to crumble away almost as rapidly as it had been formed. Amongst his numerous family there were only three sons having legitimate claim to his possessions. Their names were Micipsa, Mastanabal, and Gulussa. The two last died, or were removed early in life, leaving Micipsa in sole possession. This potentate had two sons, Adherbal and Hiempsal. He also took under his charge an illegitimate son of his brother Mastanabal, named Jugurtha, whom he educated and trained in the arts of war, and subse- quently adopted, making him joint heir with his own children. The name of Jugurtha has been immortalised by the pen of Sallust, and figures largely in the early history of Roman Africa. A true Numidian, knowing neither fear nor fatigue, unscrupulous and cunning, and skilled in the arts of war and diplomacy, he stands conspicuously in the pages of the Roman historian, more on account of his heroism and endurance in the field of battle than for his conduct as the prince of a great country. The skill and generalship of Quintus Metellus and Caius Marius, combined with the treachery of his father-in-law Bocchus, king of Mauritania, brought about his downfall, after having carried on war against Rome uninterruptedly for nearly six years. There are few characters with which the schoolboy is taught to be more familiar, and which more readily excite transient admiration, than that of Jugurtha. The manly form and fair countenance of this Numidian prince, his vigour and intelligence, his wisdom in council, his skill with weapons, and a certain youthful modesty of demeanour, bearing out the state- ment of Sallust that ' he performed very much but spoke very little of himself,' gained for him the affection of his people and the admiration of his adversaries. It is at this period that Mauritania, the land of the Moors, begins to occupy a place in Roman history. At the ' Quarterly Review, 1879. 1 6 Roman Africa commencement of the Jugurthine war, B.C. ii2, the country- was governed by Bocchus, who (to use the words of Sallust) ' was ignorant of the Romans except by name, and who, prior to this time, was as httle known to us, either in peace or war.' ^ The immediate result of the war was that all Numidia. lay at the m.ercy of the Romans. So vast a territory could only be held by a large army and the establishment of fortified posts on the southern and western frontiers. Rome was not prepared for so great an undertaking, preferring to reduce the strength of the country by dividing the kingdom of Masinissa into territories or provinces. The western portion of Numidia was transferred to Bocchus as the reward of treachery to his kinsman. Tripoli and the adjacent parts, that had formerly belonged to Carthage, were appropriated by the Romans. The rest of the country, still retaining the title of Numidia, was placed under the rule of an imbecile prince named Gauda, the grandson of Masinissa and the rightful heir to the throne. At the close of his brief reign Numidia was divided between his two sons Hiempsal and Hierbas, whose joint career was one of lifelong war and interminable rivalry. In the civil wars of Sylla and Marius they took opposite sides. Hierbas joined the Marian party, was besieged in the city of Bulla by the combined forces of Sylla and Pompey, defeated and put to death B.C. 8i. Hiempsal, the ally of the victors, was thus established on the throne of Numidia, and had every prospect of preserving, by the exercise of tact and good government, the splendid heritage of his great grandfather Masinissa. But ill-fortune tempted him in his later days into the wrong camp, and prompted him to oppose the invading army of the all-conquering Csesar. The sovereignty of the world was then in dispute between two noble Romans. At the outset the parties seemed fairly matched, the one, headed by Cneius Pompeius, upholding the maintenance of the authority of the Republic ; the other, under the leadership of C. Julius Caesar, advocating the principles of democracy and fore- shadowing a revolution in Roman policy. During the first ' Bocchus died about B.C. 91. He left the western portion of his dominions to his eldest son Bogud, and the newly annexed portions to his second son Bocchus. Fifteen years later the names of the kings were reversed, Bogud ruling in the east and Bocchus in the west. (Vide Rev. Afr. xiv. 45. ) Carthage and Rome 17 triumvirate, when Caesar, Pompey, and Crassus divided the provinces among themselves, Africa fell to the lot of Pompey. And when the final rupture terminated in the signal defeat of Pompey in the plains of Pharsalus, Caesar crossed the Medi- terranean and invaded Africa. His first attempt to land an army at Leptis Parva (Lemta), B.C. 47, was successfully pre- vented. But in the following year, when the opposing forces met at Thapsus ' (Dimas), the army of Pompey, commanded by his father-in-law Metellus Scipio and Marcus Cato, acting in conjunction with the Numidian forces under Juba I., son of Hiempsal, was utterly routed. Scipio killed himself rather than fall into the hands of Caesar. Cato fled to Utica, and on the approach of Caesar's army to lay siege to the city, perished by his own hand. Juba, attended by one companion, fled to Zama, where he had left his household and all his treasures. The gates of the city were closed against him by the terrified inhabitants, so the poor king, deserted and broken-hearted, fled to the woods and made away with himself. Numidia thus fell into the hands of the Romans, and became a province of the great Empire which was then being established by the first of the Caesars.^ The battle of Thapsus changed the whole aspect of African affairs, and enabled the conqueror to apportion the country in the manner best adapted to serve the Roman cause. For valuable assistance rendered during the campaign by Bogud, king of Eastern Mauritania (afterwards designated Mauritania Csesariensis), the eastern boundary of his kingdom was extended as far as the river Ampsaga (Roumel) ; and for the services of P. Sittius Nucerinus, whose valour was conspicuous on the ' Shaw says that Thapsus was the largest city on the coast south of Carthage, judging by the extent of the ruins. Portions of the old harbour can still be traced, and the lines of the concrete retaining walls give indications of exceptionally massive construction. Thapsus has had a long history, and was noted as a commercial port in the earlier days of Carthaginian rule. * The early history of Numidia is somewhat obscure and involved in mystery. Eusebius tells us that Hercules, after his conquest of the giant Antaeus, about fifty years before the foundation of Utica and 287 years before that of Carthage, founded the town of Capsa ; and that larbas, king of the nomadic Libyans or Numidians, sought the hand of Dido at the time that Carthage became the capital of the State. Sallust describes the Numidians as a mixture of Persians and Getulians. The word Numidians is the same as Nomades, or wanderers, a term applied in ancient times to pastoral nations without fixed abode. When the Romans took possession of Numidia they made it into a province entitled Africa nova, to distinguish it from Carthaginian territory, which was styled Africa vetus or Africa Pravincia. C 1 8 Roman Africa battle-field, and to whom the fall of Cirta (Constantine), the capital and stronghold of Numidia, was mainly due, Caesar allotted the towns of Milevum (Mila), Chullu (Collo), and Rusicada (Philippeville), as well as the capital itself and the adjacent country. In the same year the little kingdom of Cyrene, which had been subservient to Rome since B.C. 74, and had been regarded as a Roman province, was handed over by the ruling king, Ptolemy Apion. All North Africa, from the borders of Egypt to the Atlantic Ocean, was now under the control of the Romans. Mauritania was preserved as a separate kingdom, remaining for nearly a century in quasi- independence. With this new order of African affairs a form of government had to be inaugurated which should prove acceptable to the native tribes and their rulers, which should respect their ancient forms of religion, and should hold in check the turbulent spirit of the populous tribes of the south. With the fall of the Roman Republic and the dawn of imperial rule commences a fresh chapter in the history of Roman Africa. In the foregoing pages an outline of the principal events which paved the way for Roman occupation gives a fair idea of the difficulties which had to be surmounted at each succes- sive stage. They form a prelude to a long career of peace and prosperity, disturbed at intervals by harassing warfare with untameable tribes on the Desert frontier, of successful colonisa- tion, of progress in civil life, of encouragement of the arts of peace, and of decline in later years when the great Empire was tottering to its fall. 19 CHAPTER II AFRICA UNDER THE CiESARS B.C. 46-A.D. 96 The long interval between the destruction of the capital of the Carthaginians and the building of Roman Carthage is frequently lost sight of After the fall of Punic Carthage a century elapsed before Julius Caesar landed on the shores of Africa, and another century and a half passed before the reconstructed city became of sufficient importance to be recognised as the metropolis of the new colony. It is during the latter part of this interval that the old Tyrian settlement at Utica, founded about B.C. 1200, played a prominent part in political and commercial life. At first an emporium on the coast, then a walled town with a large mercantile population, governed by a Senate and suffetes, it became the chief Phcenician colony in Africa long before the foundation of Carthage. Utica retained its independence as a free republic for many centuries, but at last, being dragged un- unwillingly into the Sicilian wars which preceded the first en- counter between Rome and Carthage, it closed an independent career by acknowledging the supremacy of its more powerful countrymen. Such was the strength of its walls and magnifi- cent fortifications at the outbreak of the second Punic war that not even the genius of Scipio nor the gallantry of his soldiers could effect an entry into the city till after four years' protracted siege. In the troublous times that preceded the last Car- thaginian war, Utica, forecasting the result of further opposition to the Romans, threw open its gates to the invading army. This step was the commencement of nearly 200 years' re- vived prosperity. Utica became the residence of the Roman proconsul and the metropolis of Africa Provincia. Under Augustus it obtained the rank of a municipium, and had a population of 40,000 within the walls. The ruined monuments 20 Roman Africa covering a large tract of land bear testimony to the wealth of the city in Roman times, even at a period subsequent to the recognition of Carthage as the metropolis of Africa at the end of the first century. Under Hadrian it became a colonia. In its last days it was an important centre of Christianity, and the bishop of Utica held a conspicuous position among the prelates of the African Church. One of the chief causes which contri- buted to its final extinction as a place of renown, and which any traveller can attest, were the vagaries of the Bagradas (Medjerda) which once skirted its walls. This remarkable river, which rises in the beautiful valley of Khamisa in Algeria, and winds in a devious way across the Medjerda plain for a length of about fifty miles, has altered its course more than once. After crossing a marsh it now falls into the sea south of the lake at Porto-Farina, which is a little to the north of Utica, and about eighteen miles farther in that direction than at the period when Carthage was destroyed. The wayward action of the stream, cutting through the banks at one place and depositing its slime at another, has been a source of wonderment to many gene- rations of men inhabiting the Medjerda plains. Legendary history, or rather tradition, asserts that on the banks of the Bagradas the great combat between the army of Attilius Regulus and a monstrous serpent took place, B.C. 225. Pliny repeats the fable, and tells us that the Romans attacked the creature with balistcB and other weapons of war, laying siege to it as though it were a city. It was 120 feet long, and the skin and jaws were preserved in a temple at Rome till the outbreak of the Numantian war, B.C. 133. To the vagaries of the river may be attributed this old-world legend : — at one time a sluggish stream easily traversed at any part, at another time a swollen torrent deluging the adjacent country and carrying with irresistible force sheep and oxen, houses and trees, and anything that happens to be on the verge of its troubled waters.^ The silting up of the Gulf of Utica, which is now four miles inland, may be assigned as another reason for the decline of the city. These geographical changes appear to have occurred in the ' Turbidus arentes lento pede sulcat arenas Bagrada, non ullo Libycis infinibus anine Victus limosas extendere latius undas Et stagnante vado patulos involvere campos. Silius Italicus, vi. 141 et seq. Africa under the Caesars 21 latter days of the Empire, for we learn that Genseric, the Vandal king, A.D. 440, used the harbour of Carthage for the purposes of the fleet with which he contemplated ravaging the coast of Sicily. One may therefore suppose that the harbour of Utica, which was so renowned for its facilities of access and so adapted for warlike purposes, was at that time useless. Again, we find no traces of Byzantine constructions, or reconstruction of Roman work so common throughout North Africa, clearly proving that Utica had lost its value as a mercantile town and a stronghold for defence. The melancholy interest attaching to the site of any city of the old world is experienced in a marked degree when we contemplate and study the Phoenician and Roman remains of Utica. The town was built on a promontory, and appears to have been divided into two parts, one occupying a series of heights, the other, which was washed by the sea, being probably the commercial centre. Plutarch, in his life of Cxsar, says that the place was very strong and well defended, that Cato strengthened the fortifications considerably, raised the towers, and surrounded the walls with a deep ditch. Hirtius, who accompanied Caesar in his African campaign, also informs us that the fortifications were magnificent, that the walls were twenty feet thick, with a height up to the battlements of thirty-four feet. In many respects the arrangement of the city was similar to that of Punic Carthage, and was not disturbed by the Romans when they took possession. There was a war-port of monumental character, similar to the Cothon ' at Carthage and other coast towns, a palace for the admiral situated on an islet in the centre, a commercial harbour of great extent, a Byrsa or acropolis, and cisterns of vast dimensions. Among the buildings of Roman date were a hippodrome, a magnificent theatre, an amphitheatre and museum, temples and baths. It is difficult, in the present day, to trace the lines of all these monumental structures, many of which are indicated by undulations of the ground rather than by masses of ruined masonry. According to M. Daux, the hippodrome or circus ' The term cothon may be regarded as of Phoenician origin. We may accept ■the meaning attached to it by Latin commentators, and as used by the Greek historian Appianus, a.d. 123: ' Cothones appellantur portus in mari arte et manu facti.' (M. J. Toutain, Les Citis Romain.es de la Tunisie, p. 150 ; also cf. Ch. Tissot, ■Ghgraphie comfarle de la Province Romaine d'Afrique, p. 603. ) 22 Roman Africa was 1 ,730 feet long and 250 feet wide. The amphitheatre, which is clearly defined, was hollowed out of a plateau on the summit of a hill. The great cisterns are six in number, side by side, each measuring 135 feet by 20 feet, with a height to the crown of the vault of 24 feet. Three of these cisterns are in good condition, and are occupied as farm-stables. Their construc- tion is Phoenician, but the vaulting is Roman. The streets of the city were narrow, not exceeding fourteen feet, and they were paved. Servius says that the Romans borrowed the idea of street-paving from the Carthaginians — a statement which is borne out by Isidore of Seville and other writers. ' The adjacent country,' says Caesar in his Commentaries, 'is of great fertility. The trees supply quantities of timber. The fields are covered with corn, and there is water in abundance.' To testify his appreciation of the commercial wealth of the inhabitants, Csesar, we are told, mulcted three hundred merchants of the city in a sum equivalent to one million sterling. Plutarch also informs us that, on his return from Africa after a campaign of three whole years, Csesar spoke of his triumph in magniloquent terms. He said that the country he had just conquered was so extensive that the Roman people might draw from it every year two hundred thousand Attic bushels of corn and three million pounds of oil. The remains of Utica, as well as of other towns on the coast, present opportunities of comparing the Punic and Roman methods of building, in the use of stone and rubble, as well as the application of concrete or rammed earth commonly known as pisi. At Utica the distinction is very marked. The earliest walls, which are massive, are entirely of rubble, but the stones being small and the lime being made from the same stone, they have the appearance of concrete construction. The vaulting of Punic times is with the same materials, but the art of constructing arches by voussoirs, or of vaults on the same principle, was unknown to these Phoenician builders. The inner faces of walls appear to have been coated with thin lime, and from the absence of cut stones, the bold rounding of angles, and the prevalence of rounded forms, it would appear that implements for the dressing and squaring of stone were then unknown. The remains of the admiral's palace, which form a conspicuous mass among the ruins of Utica, are a good example of this kind of building with ii'jt- -•~-:.Mi^2. M H < X u D O S u H X, Africa under the Caesars 23 rubble. At Thapsus (Dimas) the Punic sea-wall, nearly a quarter of a mile long, not yet quite destroyed, was built up in frames with small pebbles and mortar, like modern concrete construction. To use the words of Shaw, the traveller, ' the walls are so well cemented and knit together that a solid rock cannot be more hard or durable.' In walking over the ploughed fields and marshy lands of Bou-Chater, as Utica is now called, from which the sea has receded several miles, it is difficult to believe that some thirty or more feet under the surface lie the paved streets and foundations of one of the oldest known cities in the world. Although the plough literally turns up marble, it is the marble of the Roman city. Older Utica lies below. The investi- gations of the late M. Daux and of M. le Comte d'Herisson, and their researches into the origin and development of Phoe- nician emporia^ are of comparatively recent date. A tribute of gratitude is certainly due to them for having, under great difficulties and with little information at their command, made a careful study of Utica and of the remains of other coast towns prior to the Roman occupation. Homeric Troy has been unearthed, and Mycenae has given up its treasures. Perhaps old Utica, which flourished 3,000 years ago, may engage the attention of a future Schliemann, and throw additional light on the history of an ancient people. A few words must suffice for the Carthage of the Romans, which has been ably described by so many writers of note. Built on the site of the older city but occupying a smaller area, it attained the climax of its prosperity early in the second century. Some idea of its magnificence can be obtained from the borrowed remains in marble and porphyry which still enrich the principal mosques and palaces in North Africa, which help ' M. A. Daux, Recherches stir P Origins et P Emplacement des Emporia phiniciens dans le Zeugis et le Byzacium, faites par ordre de P Empereur, Paris, 1869 ; Le Comte d'Herisson, Relation d'une Mission archeologiqiie en Tunisie, Paris, 1881. The tract of country designated the Emporia comprises the coast of the lesser Syrtes, with the towns located there. The principal city was Leptis Minor (Lemta), where there was a considerable mercantile population. Under Carthaginian rule Leptis paid tribute to Carthage amounting to one talent a day. Another important town and port was Tacape (Gabes). Zeugitania or Zeugis, so called by Pliny and other ancient geographers, is the old Phoenician territory, afterwards peopled by Cartha- ginians. Byzacium or Byzacena included the country between Zeugis and Lake Triton, together with the emporia, on the coast. Both these regions constitute modem Tunisia. 24 Roman Africa to make Cordova one of the wonders of the Western worldj and to which the sumptuous beauty of Pisa is chiefly due. El- Bekri, the Arab writer of the eleventh century, says : ' Marble at Carthage is so abundant that, if all the inhabitants of Africa were to assemble to carry away the blocks, they could not accomplish the task ; ' and speaking of the columns of the amphitheatre he quaintly adds : ' Two men could sit on one of the capitals cross-legged with plenty of room for a table in the middle. The shafts are fluted, white as snow, and shining like crystal.' And now of all this monumental grandeur not one stone remains on another. But it is some satisfaction to know that, if the later Carthage with its wealth of marble and mosaic no longer exists, yet the paved streets of the Punic metropolis still await the spade of the explorer some forty feet below the present surface. The few sculptures and mosaics appertaining to Roman Carthage that may be seen in the local museum, as well as those deposited some years ago by the late Mr. Davis in the British Museum, represent only a small portion of discovered remains. The majority have served to enrich many private collections. Among the mosaics recovered by Mr. Davis is one which represents some dwelling-houses ap- parently built against or near the city walls. This mosaic, which is of the fourth century, is a portion of a large compo- sition representing a hunting scene, the figures being nearly half life-size. Judging from the appearance of the roofs and the general scale, these houses could not have been less than seven stories high. We know that buildings in Rome were erected of an enormous height before the time of the Empire, that during the reign of Augustus a law was promulgated by the Senate which restricted the height of buildings in the streets of Rome to 60 feet, and that subsequently in Trajan's time a limit of 70 feet was allowed, without regard to the widths of the streets. It is quite possible that the Augustan law prevailed in the rebuilding of Carthage, which was commenced during his reign, and that the Senate was powerless to impose restrictions in later times, when building ground within the city walls was of abnormal value.' ' Appianus, the Greek historian, who flourished in the time of Hadrian, says that the streets of Roman Carthage were narrow and irregular, and that they were paved with large flat stones. He also adds that some of the houses were six stories MOSAIC IN THE BRITISH MUSEUM REPRESENTING THE WALLS OF ROMAN CARTHAGE. Africa under the Caesars 25 The establishment of the principles of monarchy, dating fronl the time when Csesar and Pompey acted in unison to overthrow the aristocratic constitution of Rome, became permanent after Caesar's decisive victory at Thapsus. The new order of things, far from interfering with the liberty enjoyed by the native races, left them undisturbed in nearly everything except a recognition of their dependence upon Rome. Numidia, the latest acquired territory, became a Roman province under the title of Africa nova to distinguish it from Africa Provincia, which was now called Africa vetus. And as a first step towards establishing a permanent form of government, a proconsul of Numidia was appointed to reside at Cirta, the old capital of Eastern Numidia and of Masinissa's kingdom. Caesar, in the exercise of his monarchical powers, appointed Sallust, the historian, to the post for one year, ' nominally,' says Dion, ' to govern it, but in reality to ravage and plunder it.' His recall to Rome to answer the charges of extortion made against him by Numidian chiefs was followed almost immediately by the assassination of his imperial patron. No successor was appointed. On the accession of Augustus Numidia was handed over to its rightful heir, the son of Juba I., and the direct descendant of Masinissa. This step was taken with a view to conciliating the people of the country, but chiefly for the purpose of making their king subservient to the will of Rome. The incidents in the life of this last native ruler of the Numidian kingdom are very touching, and shed unusual lustre on the closing pages of its history. This young prince, afterwards known as Juba II., was but a child when his father terminated his career so ingloriously after his defeat at Thapsus. Taken captive to Rome,'he followed the chariot wheels of Caesar in his triumphal entry into the city, and might have perished in a dungeon or met with that summary injustice which was too often meted out to the conquered in war. But a better fate was in store for him. The comely looks of the lad and his marked intelligence attracted Ihe attention of the great Augustus, who committed him to the charge of his sister Octavia, the discarded wife of the ill-fated Antony. Devoting himself to literature and high, especially in the oldest part of the town, and that the external walls, where exposed to the sea, were coated with tar. According to Livy, Roman Carthage was twenty-three (Roman) miles in circuit. Carthago in circuitu viginti tria millia passus fatens. (Liv. Epit. li. ) 26 Roman Africa the arts of peace, the young Juba became one of the most learned men of his time. On arriving at man's estate, Augustus seated him on the throne of his ancestors, and bestowed on him the hand of Cleopatra Selene, the daughter of Antony and his Egyptian queen. Shortly afterwards the Emperor, finding it necessary, mainly on military grounds, to occupy the eastern portion of the country as a Roman province, and to establish a seat of government at Cirta, transferred Juba to the western portion, the capital being the old Phoenician city of lol, and for a short period the capital of Mauritania.^ This was renamed Julia Caesarea, and is now known by its Arab name of Cherchel. Here, on this beautiful spot, washed by the shores of the Mediterranean, Juba II. reconstructed the city on a magnificent scale and embellished it with works of art from Greece and Rome. Here, during a prosperous rule of nearly fifty years, he gathered around him all the celebrities of his time in literature and art, introducing into his kingdom elements of civilisation unknown to the unruly tribes of North Africa. His only son Pompey, who succeeded him, took up arms against Cssar, and paid the penalty of his rashness by the sacrifice of his kingdom. His daughter Drusilla, who died in a foreign land, married Felix, the governor of Judaea, before whom Paul was arraigned.^ Had Juba II. lived in other times, his career would have entitled him to a far more conspicuous position, but the dazzling rule of the Caesars and the stirring events in other parts of the world at the dawn of the Chris- tian era cast into the shade the unobtrusive labours of so peaceful a monarch, affording but few materials for the historian. Such was his popularity throughout a long reign that the Athenians raised a statue in his honour, and the tribes of the ' The origin of the word lol is uncertain, attempts having been made to asso- ciate the word with lola, the name of one of the reputed wives of Hercules. As a Carthaginian port it was well known ; but the town itself, according to Pomponius Mela, does not appear to have been of any importance in his time. He speaks of it as lol ad mare aliquando ignobilis (P. Mela, iii. c. vi). At a later date Pliny refers to it as oppidum cekberrimum, and Procopius, in the sixth century, makes special reference to the splendour of the city and its numerous population. Vide ' Life and Writings of Juba,' by I'Abb^ Sevin, in the Mimoires de VAcadimie des Inscriptions, iv. 457. ^ According to Suetonius, Felix married two princesses bearing the name of Drusilla, the first being the daughter of Juba, and the second a Jewess, the daughter of Agrippa. (Suet, in CI. i8. Tacit. Ann. xii. c. 14.) Mir «- Jt" Africa under the Caesars 27 Desert worshipped him as a deity : Et Juba, Mauris volentibus, deus est. Of his numerous literary works fragments only remain. It is enough that Strabo, Pliny, and other less prolific writers bear testimony to the value of his researches, and quote freely from his histories of Rome and Arabia, as well as treatises on various subjects. And it is enough for us that the monu- mental edifice which he erected to contain the ashes of himself and his Egyptian queen is still standing, though in a ruined condition, on the summit of a lonely mountain some ten miles east of his capital — an enduring memorial of the most learned, if not the greatest, of Numidians. The form of this tomb is polygonal, surmounted by a trun- cated cone composed of a series of steps each 22 inches high, and terminating in a platform. The diameter of the polygon, which appears to be cylindrical, is 198 feet. It stands on a square stone platform measuring 210 feet each way. Around the polygon or podium of the structure are 60 engaged columns of the Ionic order, with Attic bases and capitals of a Greek type, and surmounted by a frieze and cornice which, as far as one can gather from the scattered fragments, had only a slight projection. The total height of the monument was originally about 1 30 feet, but the top courses of masonry having been thrown down it is now about no feet. At four places in the colonnade, corre- sponding to the cardinal points, are false stone doors about 14 inches thick and 20 feet high. The entrance to the tomb, which is under the eastern false door, was discovered by MM. Berbrugger and MacCarthy in 1866. The plan of the monu- ment, shown on the accompanying illustration, with its spiral gallery and sepulchral chambers, is taken from the elaborate notices and measurements by those eminent Algerian scholars. After descending seven steps the gallery commences, averaging 6 feet 6 inches wide and 7 feet 10 inches high, with a total length of nearly 500 feet. The gallery terminates in two vaulted chambers 1 5 feet high. The first, measuring 1 3 feet by 4 feet 9 inches, is commonly known as ' The Chamber of Lions,' on account of a rudely sculptured lion and lioness on the door- head. The second or central one measures 13 feet by 9 feet 6 inches. Stone doors formed of single stone slabs, fitting loosely and moving in grooves in the jambs, shut off the two chambers as well as the gallery. There are niches at 28 Roman Africa intervals in the walls of the gallery to receive lamps, and in the central chamber are two niches for similar purposes or for cinerary vases. Outside and about lO feet in front of the entrance are indications of a raised stone platform, where the ceremony of cremation was probably performed, and where the funeral urn or cinerarium was deposited. The external masonry of the monument is of coarse hard limestone, but the interior filling is of tufa, solidly constructed. The courses of stone are laid with great regularity, breaking bond from top to bottom. They were put together with metal cramps which have long since dis- appeared, though the mortices in the blocks to receive them are very conspicuous. The masonry of the gallery and the cham- bers is still in good preservation, having been constructed with large blocks of squared and dressed limestone, and finely jointed. Mortar, if used at all, must have been very thin, and the gallery was apparently faced with thin plaster. The dilapidated condition of the monument externally is attributable to numerous unsuccessful attempts to penetrate the interior in search of treasure, more than once with the aid of artillery. So solid is the construction that, even in its exposed situation, it might have resisted the wear of nineteen centuries and remained fairly perfect to the present day if the destructive Arab had never passed over the land. During a long period succeeding the Roman occupation of North Africa, when the country was overrun successively by Vandals, Byzantines, and Arabs, the traditions associated with this gigantic tomb and the purposes of its erection seem to have been forgotten. So recently as the time of Shaw it was known by the Arab name of Maltapasi, or Treasure of the Sugarloaf. How it came to receive the absurd appellation by which it is now universally known, ' Le Tombeau de la Chr^tienne,' is not difficult to explain. Hear what Dr. Judas, a learned Orientalist, says on the subject. The term Kubr-er-Roumiah of the Arabs is the ancient Phoenician designation which, taken in its original sense, means ' Tombeau Royal.' The natives, instead of trans- lating this foreign word Roumiah, as they ought to have done, have given it the same meaning as a similarly sounding word in their own language, Roumi, viz. ' Strangers of Christian origin,' the feminine being Roumiah. And the French mis- translation originated in a misinterpretation of a feature in the 4!>? »*»^^ E^ -* s. V*. )T| fUN Of TO^B Of JOBA 1( ^===^ w PPOIUNI Of 6UppO5e0 TON|B Of ^^A551NI55\ . Africa under the Caesars 29 architecture, the stiles of the four-panelled stone doors being mistaken for crosses. Hence it was inferred that such a tomb must have been that of a Christian ! ' The name is preserved,' says Dr. Judas, ' but nevertheless we must protest against its absurdity.' Leaving this tangle of French and Arabic, we turn with satisfaction to the pages of Pomponius Mela, a geographer of the first century who had seen this monument, probably in the lifetime of Juba II., and we find it described in simple language as ' Monumentum commune regice gentis.' That it was intended as the common sepulchre of Juba and his descendants is clear enough ; but his dynasty, as we have said, was short- lived. It is worthy of mention, in concluding an account of this edifice, that vegetation is so luxuriant on its conical top that some years ago M. Jourdain, the naturalist, found ample matter for a pamphlet entitled Flore murale du Tombeau de la ChrMenne. Mention should here be made of a similar tomb about fifty-two miles south of Constantine, called by the Arabs the Medrassen, probably after a tribe known as the Madres, who occupied a neighbouring territory on the northern slopes of the Aures mountains. By some it has been thought to be the sepulchre of Syphax, and there is a tradition that the monument was raised by the Emperor Pfobus in honour of the African chief Aradion, who fell bravely in his last struggle with the soldiers of the Empire. We may pass by these conjectures, for it is tolerably certain that the edifice was built by Masinissa as a sepulchre for himself and his descendants, or by his son and successor Micipsa. Its situation in the centre of his kingdom, and at a convenient distance from his new capital Cirta, favours this supposition. There is no sufficient ground for supposing it to have been built by Syphax, for it must be remembered that, till the last year of his reign, his capital was at Siga, on the western frontier of his dominions. Moreover, Syphax was led captive to Rome and died in prison. The form of the tomb is cylindrical, surmounted by a trun- cated cone composed of a series of steps, each being 21 inches high. The cylinder, having a diameter of about 190 feet, is ornamented by 60 engaged columns with a frieze and cornice, and stands on three steps forming a base to the entire monu- ment. The material of the facework is a fine sandstone, but 30 Roman Africa the mass of the structure is formed of thin slabs of inferior stone in regular courses, having at a distance the "appearance of bricks. The columns and cornice are Egyptian in character. The capitals are Greek. The monument, in fact, is one of the few existing buildings in North Africa which mark the transition between Egyptian and Greek art, and was probably the work of an architect from the neighbouring colony of Alexandria towards the close of the second Punic war, B.C. 201. The entrance to the sepulchral chamber, which Is nearly in the centre of the monument, is above the cornice on the west side, and is approached by a series of steps and a straight narrow gallery. The tomb has been ransacked from time to time in search of treasure, and, from the charred appearance of some of the masonry, attempts must have been made to set it on fire. It was not till 1873 that the French engineers succeeded in finding and effecting an entry, and, after much patient labour, discovered the sepulchral chamber measuring 10 feet 3 inches by 4 feet 7 inches. Nothing of value is stated to have been found during the exploration. The points of resemblance between these two monuments, the Medrassen and the so-called Tombeau de la Chrdtienne, are very striking, leaving no room for doubt that one furnished the idea for the other. Their value must be estimated, not on the ground of any special artistic merit, but as links in a long chain of architectural history, and as memorials of two men whose names will be for ever associated with that old-world country Numidia.' The remains of Juba's renowned capital, splendidissima colonia Ccesariensis, as it is designated in one of the numerous inscriptions, are very extensive. Sacked by Firmus in the fourth century, it was razed to the ground by the Vandals a century later. Under Barbarossa it regained something of its former splendour, but the city was almost entirely overthrown by an earthquake- in 1738. After such vicissitudes it is not surprising to find the remains in a fragmentary condition. ' A somewhat similar monument is that of El Djedar in Oran. And in Western Algeria, not far from the village of Frenda, is a group of smaller tombs in the form of low pyramids supported on square, instead of circular or polygonal, podiums. The largest is about forty-three feet high, the podium being about ten feet. The entrance was from the top of the podium, descending by a flight of steps to a vaulted corridor communicating with the sepulchral chambers in the centre of the monu- ment. Tomb of Juba II. RESTORED.) Scale of Feer Supposed Tomb of Massinissa. (RESTORED.] Africa under the Caesars 31 ' Nothing,' says Shaw in 1730, ' could have been better contrived, either for strength or beauty, than the situation of this city. A strong wall, forty feet high, buttressed, and winding nearly two miles along the shore, secured it from all encroachments from the sea.' The outlines of the amphitheatre, choked with some twelve feet of earth, may still be traced in the middle of a ploughed field. Nearly all the steps have disappeared, and the blocks of stone and marble with which the edifice was constructed have been regarded as a quarry for many centuries past. The great cisterns, storing more than four million gallons, are still used as reservoirs, and in connection with the same system of supply as the ancient city. The principal thermce, the fa§ade of which was more than 300 feet long, are scarcely traceable in outline, though the huge masses of solid walls still standing give a fair idea of the magnificence of the edifice. There were at one time two other palatial baths, the remains of one of them being still visible by the seashore. The hippo- drome, which some seventy years ago was in fair preservation, with its portico and columns of marble and granite, is now a mere undulation of its surface. The blocks of stone have been removed, and the ddbris accumulated during this long interval has almost obliterated the outline. There is little doubt that Julia Caesarea remains to be unearthed. Whenever excavations have been made, architectural fragments have been brought to light : columns of black diorite, shafts of white marble, busts and broken statuary, many of them replicas of Greek statuary ordered by Juba for the embellishment of his city. Some of them are still stored in the little museum at Cherchel, suffi- ciently attesting the splendour of Juba's capital and his ap- preciation of the work of Greek artists. Outside the city are the remains of the aqueduct which conveyed the waters of Djebel Chennoua. Eighteen arches only remain. When Bruce visited Cherchel in 1765 he found the aqueduct in much better condition. A drawing made by him has been preserved, show- ing a triple series of arches, rising in one part to the height of 116 feet' ' The construction of this aqueduct, which is a conspicuous object in the land- scape, is very irregular, and will not bear comparison with the great aqueduct of Carthage. The span of the arches is about nineteen feet, and the thickness of the piers averages fourteen feet. 32 Roman Africa The administration of the provinces which constituted Roman Africa in the early days of the Empire presented many difficulties, owing to the uncivilised and restless character of the natives in the interior, and the uncertain attitude of the tribes on the Desert frontier. Prior to the accession of Caligula, A.D. 37, the general commanding the Roman army in Africa was proconsul of Africa and Numidia, but that emperor sepa- rated the civil establishment from the military. Under his successor Claudius the system of government was definitely organised, and the older province, Africa vetus, was admi- nistered by a proconsul nominated by the Senate and selected from that body. His functions were both civil and military. He was chosen for his merits as a ruler and for his high social position, much in the same way as the governor of a colony of the British Empire. He held office for one year, resided at Carthage, and received a fixed salary equivalent to 8,000/. sterling. The newer province of Numidia, Africa nova, was administered by a legatus, or lieutenant-general, selected from the Senate and approved by the Emperor. He resided at Cirta, had the command of the Roman troops permanently stationed in Africa, and was responsible for the security of both provinces, as well as the maintenance of order on the frontiers. He held command at the pleasure of the Emperor, and was called legatus A ugusti pro prcstore legionis III A ugustce, abbre- viated generally to legatus Augusti pro prcstore} Beyond Numidia, extending from the river Ampsaga (Roumel), lay Mauritania, which was divided by Claudius (after the murder of Ptolemy, son of Juba H, by his predecessor) ihto two pro- vinces, the eastern portion being called Mauritania Caesariensis, with Caesarea for its capital, and the western portion Mauritania Tingitana, deriving its name from the chief town in that region, Tingis (Tangiers). Each of these provinces was governed by a ' (C. /. L.) No. 10165. Ann. de Const. 1858-59, p. 181. Corpus Inscripiionum Latinarum (C. /. Z.), vol. viii. part I, entitled /bjc?-^- tiones Africa Latince, Gustavus Wilmanns, Berlin, 1881. A supplement entitled Inscriptiones Africa Proconsularis Latince, Renatus Cagnat and Johannes Schmidt, Berlin, 1891. Vol. viii. part 2, entitled Inscriptiones Africce Latince, Gustavus Wilmanns, Paris, 1 88 1. A supplement entitled Inscriptiones Provincia Numidia LatincB, Renatus Cagnat, Johannes Schmidt, and Hermannus Dessau, Berlin, 1894. Africa under the Caesars 33 procurator,^ who, according to Dion Cassius, was of equestrian rank.^ This continued till the third century, when the title pro- curator vfa.s superseded hy presses. These four Roman provinces of Africa constituted four gradations of civilisation, the first bidding fair to rival Rome and Alexandria in wealth, culture, and general prosperity, and the last scarcely removed from barbarism, inhabited by tribes whose petty rivalries were the cause of constant disturbance. The Roman occupation of Mauritania dates from the fall of Ptolemy, A.D. 39. In contrast with the career of his distin- guished father, the short reign of this unworthy prince was marked by misgovernment and debauchery. It is to be regretted that the name of Juba II does not appear on any inscribed stone yet discovered, but the name of the son is recorded on a slab of marble at Saldae (Bougie) : ' REGI ■ PTO LEMAEO REG ■ IVBAE • F Another discovered at Algiers and deciphered by Renier runs thus : Regi Ptolemceo, regis Juba filio, Lucius Cacilius Rufus, Agilis filius, honoribus omnibus patrice sua consummatis de sua pecunia faciendum, curavit et consecravit.* The earliest attempts at colonisation in Africa by C. Gracchus, after the destruction of Carthage, proved, as already remarked, unsuccessful, and Colonia Junonia, as it was called, was abandoned. To Julius Caesar and his successor must be accorded the honour of establishing on a permanent basis a system of colonisation which soon spread through the Roman provinces. By imperial order 3,000 Italian colonists were located in Carthaginian territory, and under the protection of Rome and Carthage throve with amazing rapidity. Utica, hitherto the capital and principal commercial city in the province, had already received the privilege of Latin rights as some compensation for the favours shown to its distinguished com- petitor, and was in a position to reassert its claims as one of the chief ports of the Mediterranean.^ In Numidia an advance ' C. I. L. Nos. 9362, 9363. '^ Dion Cassius, Ix. 9. ' C. I. L. No. 8927. ■* Inscriptions Romaines de PAlgirie (/. R. A.), par Leon Renier, Paris, 1858 ; /. R. A. No. 4049. Berbrugger, Rev. Afr. i. p. 57. = Mommsen's History of Rome, iv. 544. D 34 Roman Africa was made by conferring the rights and privileges attached to Roman military colonies upon Cirta the capital, as well as on other towns which had been assigned to Publius Sittius and his troops, for great services rendered to the State. Many towns in the interior, which the insane fury of Juba I had rendered desolate, were not revived till a later period, but the great Julian colonies, Carthage and Cirta, became at once the centres of Africano- Roman civilisation. ..-, From the date of the decisive battle of Actium, B.C. 31, to the latter days of the reign of Tiberius, an interval of more than sixty years. North Africa enjoyed a period of rest which helped forward the cause of civilisation. The gentle rule of Juba II in the western province, and the endearing regard with which he was held by turbulent tribes on the frontier, checked insur- rection and spread the arts of peace among a lawless population ^scarcely removed from barbarism. But no sooner had his worthless son Pompey ascended the throne of Mauritania, and commenced a career of misgovernment and debauchery, than a revolution broke out. Tacfarinas, a Numidian and a deserter from the Roman army, where he held command of an auxiliary force — a bandit rather than a warrior — raised the standard of revolt, and drew to his camp a motley herd of miscreants, adventurers, and cut-throats. Amongst them was a Moor named Mazippa, to whom Tacfarinas gave the command of the scum of his army, with permission to carry on the war with fire and sword, and to show no mercy to town or village in his march of destruction. Reserving for himself the better disci- plined troops, whom he trained and armed after Roman methods, this daring Numidian drew the Roman legions after him, some- times in the plains, at others on the hillsides, in the vain hope of tiring them out with the fatigue of constantly shifting their camp and countermarching in a difficult country. For seven whole years Tacfarinas carried on this predatory warfare with varying success, and, in the words of Tacitus, sparsit bellum. Rome was alarmed for the safety of her African possessions, for we are told that the Emperor Tiberius, in addressing the Senate, implored them to select for proconsul a man of military experi- ence, blessed with a vigorous constitution, and capable of bringing this disastrous war to a close. Tacfarinas was at last taken by surprise near Tubusuptus (Tiklat) by the army of Africa under the Caesars 35 p. Cornelius Dolabella, proconsul of Africa ; and, finding his forces decimated and no hope of retreat, he rushed fearlessly into the fight and died like a true Numidian. The war was over, and a cry of deliverance went through the land : is demum annus populum Romanum longo adversum Numidam Tacfari- natem bello absolvit. To encourage growth of population and to promote assimi- lation of the Roman with native races, the first Emperors established on the old Carthaginian highways colonies of veterans, as they were called, all men of approved military experience. They were exempt from taxation and had many privileges, but held themselves in readiness to bear arms in times of war or local disturbance. Some of the native towns, which had been partly deserted after the overthrow of the Carthaginians, were peopled with Italians, and fortified villages were built at points of vantage near the frontiers. There are records of nearly fifty such towns at this period, many of which had been Punic or Numidian. These were renamed by order of the Emperors. It may be assumed that the principal ones were occupied by colonies of soldiers who had done good service in battle, or had lost their substance in the service of the State. Among the most noticeable were Uthina (Oudena), Maxula (Mascula), Thuburbo major (Tebourba), and Sicca Veneria (El-Kef). Their monumental remains bear ample testi- mony to the prosperity they attained at this remote period. The constitutional difference between municipia and colonics has given rise to much controversy, and it is only by a com- parison of the opinions expressed by able authorities that a clue can be found to a fairly accurate interpretation of these terms. Suetonius says that municipia were foreign towns which had obtained the rights appertaining to Roman citizens. They were of different kinds. Some enjoyed all the rights of Roman citizens, except those which could not be held without residing in Rome, while others were invested with the right of serving in the Roman legions, but could not hold civil office, nor had they the privilege of voting. The municipia had their own laws and customs, and they were not obliged to accept Roman laws unless they chose. Gibbon is quite explicit on the subject. He tells us that ' a nation of Romans was gradually formed in the provinces, by the double expedient of introducing colonies, 36 Roman Africa and of admitting the most faithful and deserving of the pro- vincials to the freedom of Rome. Throughout the Empire districts were reserved for the establishment of colonies, some of which were of a civil, and others of a military nature. In their manners and internal policy the colonies formed a perfect representation of their great parent ; and as they were soon endeared to the natives by the ties of friendship and alliance, they effectually diffused a reverence for the Roman name, and a desire, which was seldom disappointed, of sharing, in due time, its honours and advantages. The municipal cities in- sensibly equalled the rank and splendour of the colonies ; and in the reign of Hadrian it was disputed which was the preferable condition of those societies which had issued from, or those which had been received into, the bosom of Rome.'' Liddell, another able authority, says that, in considering this question of colonice, we must dismiss from our minds those conceptions of colonisation which are familiar to us from the practice of ancient Greece or of the maritime States of modern Europe. Roman colonies were not planted in new countries by ad- venturers who found their old homes too narrow for their wants or their ambition. The colonies of Roman citizens consisted usually of 300 men of approved military experience, who went forth with their families to occupy conquered cities of no great magnitude, but important as military positions. The 300 families formed a sort of patrician caste, while the old inhabitants sank into the condition formerly occupied by the plebeians at Rome. The heads of these families re- tained all their rights as Roman citizens, and might repair to Rom€ to vote in the popular assemblies.^ The same author says with regard to municipia that 'they furnished certain contingents of troops, which they were obliged to provide with pay and equipments while on service, provisions being found by the Romans. Their privileges consisted in freedom from all other taxes, and in possessing more or less completely the right of self-government. They were thus exempt from all tribute or toll paid to Rome, except military service. They administered their own laws. They exercised the civil or private rights of Roman citizens ; but none, without special ' Gibbon's Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, vol. i. p. 172. 2 Liddell's History of Rome, vol. i. B. 3, c. 27. Africa under the Caesars 37 grant, had any power of obtaining political or public rights. There was considerable diversity of condition among the 'municipia! Another writer ' defines a colony as ' part of the Roman State. There were Roman colonies and Latin colonies. The members of a Roman colony, colonia civium Romanorum, must have always had the same rights which, as citizens, they would have at Rome,' but the conquered people among whom the Romans sent their colonists were not Roman citizens. The power of Rome over her colonies was derived, says Niebuhr, ' from the supremacy of the parent State, to which the colonies of Rome, like sons in a Roman family, even after they had grown to maturity, continued unalterably subject' On the subject of municipia a well-known writer ^ says they ' had a narrower import after B.C. 90, and signified the civitates sociorum and colonicB Latin(B, which then became complete members of the Roman State. Thus there was really no difference between municipia and colonicB, except in their historic origin and in their original internal constitution. The Roman law prevailed in both.' M. J. Toutain, the most recent writer on the subject, says that the terms colonia and municipium, used as the official titles of . several African cities, had each its own meaning, and that the conditions of the municipia were inferior to those of the colonics? But he adds that the words lost their respective significations at a later period of the Empire, and were employed indifferently. The colonies sent out by Augustus and his immediate successors were essentially of a military character, and differed in many respects from those referred to by Tacitus a century later."* Whereas the former were composed of veterans commanded by military tribunes, the latter were chosen hap- hazard from the army, but not banded together by old associa- tions or the ties of mutual interest. Tacitus speaks deploringly of this class of colonics, and almost refuses to mention them by that designation. We learn from Pliny, who speaks of colonies ' Smith's Diet, of Class. Antiq. art. ' Colonia. ' ' Ibid. ' Toutain, Les Citis Romaines de la Tunisie, Paris, 1895, P- 324- ■■ It is worthy of mention that Londinium (London) was not even a colonia when C. Suetonius Paulinus, the general, and afterwards governor of Britain, A.D. 60, marched through the town (Tacitus, Ann. lib. xiv. c. 33). Richard of Cirencester mentions nine colonia in Britain, of which Londinium was one ; and two municipia, \Eboracum (York) and Verolamium (St. Albans). 38 Roman Africa in the province of Africa as colonics, and municipia as oppida civium Romanorum, that classification extended still further. There were oppida libera, which had the privilege of self-govern- ment, and there were oppida simply. These were probably- inhabited entirely by natives having their own laws and pre- serving their own language. Pliny also mentions one oppidum stipendiarium, which paid a fixed tribute to Rome ; one oppidum Latinum, which had only Latin rights ; and one oppidum im- mune, which was free from tribute. In short, colonics were communities founded by genuine colonists, municipia were towns in which all the inhabitants had rights of Roman citizen- ship, oppida Latina were towns enjoying the same privileges as were formerly accorded to members of the Latin confedera- tion, and the rest wei'e provincial communities and towns with varying privileges. The spread of colonisation and municipal life was restricted to towns on the coast or a few fortified cities in the interior, till about the time of Vespasian. Absence of roads, general ignorance of the country and its inhabitants, and the want of fortified outposts checked the enthusiasm of the Cassars in their eagerness for the entire subjugation of Africa. The peculiar configuration of Africa, from Tripoli westward to the Atlantic, and from the Mediterranean southward to the Great Desert, has always been a bar to permanent civilisation. Until the arrival of the Romans no one of the native tribes, however successful in predatory warfare or distinguished for those daring qualities which were so conspicuous in Masinissa and Jugurtha, had ever contem- plated the conquest of the inhabitants of mountainous regions. On the southern frontier it was as impossible then as it has proved, to be after a lapse of 2,000 years. Looking southward from the Mediterranean we have the coast country, known as the Tell of modern Algeria, a region of undulating fertile soil, v aryingin width from fifty to a hundred miles, intersected by ravines and attaining considerable altitude in those parts now occupied by Khabyles. Behind are the high plateaux, mostly lying between two long crests of mountain ranges, where the soil is variable, some highly productive, but hardened by a tropical sun, dotted with salt-marshes and rising in terraces till they attain an alti- tude of nearly 7,600 feet. These table-lands, which once contributed largely to the wheat supply of Rome, were in high Africa under the Caesars 39 cultivation long before the arrival of the Romans. The general aspect must have been much the same as in the present day. Road communication had been established by the Carthaginians along the coast and to a few towns in the interior, but it was not till the time of Trajan that impetus was given to any organised system of road construction. When the southern territory of the Carthaginians, extending from Thenae on the coast to the borders of Tripoli, had been handed over to Masinissa by the Romans at the close of the second Punic war, that enterprising Numidian attempted to alter the nomadic lives of his people by settling them in small towns or villages, linked together by a chain of roads. We have no record of the success of his scheme. All these roads formed part of a network of military highways which traversed the country in all directions early in the second century, and portions of which still unexpectedly greet the traveller's eye in journeying through regions which are appa- rently trackless. From Carthage, the new metropolis of Africa, there were only two roads. One went in a north-westerly direction to Utica, and then by way of Membro to Hippo- Diarrhytus (Bizerta). The other, skirting the north side of the Lake of Tunes (Tunis), had two branches. One went direct west to the banks of the Bagradas (Medjerda), and, crossing the river at a place called Djedeida, went to Teburbo minus (Tebourba), Bulla Regia (Henchir Hammam Darradji) and Simittu (Chemtou), terminating at Hippone (Bone). The other branch, after passing the salt lake of Tunis, now called Sebkha es-Sedjoumi, continued as far as Theveste on the southern frontier. From Czesarea (Cherchel) one road followed the shore, and another passed through the valley between the Great and Little Atlas. But the principal highway from this city traversed the banks of the Chelif and went by way of the plains to Sitifis (Setif) and Cirta (Constantine), the capital of Numidia. From Cirta there was a road to the coast at Rusicada (Philippeville), and from Kalama (Guelma) in the interior two roads — one to Hippo Regius, and the other by way of Naragarra and Sicca Veneria (El-Kef) to Bulla Regia, and so on to Utica and Carthage. A southern road went through Zama to Hadru- metum (Susa) on the coast, continuing to Thysdrus (El-Djem) and Thenae ; whilst another highway of considerable importance linked together the well-known towns of Lambaesis (Lambessa), 40 Roman Africa Thamugas (Timegad), Theveste (Tebessa), Ammaedara (Hydra), and Telepte. Still further south, some few leagues north of Lake Triton, there was a road from Capsa (Gafsa) binding together a long line of military outposts, and extending eastward as far as Cyrene. Hippo Regius was the starting-point of seven roads, and Lambsesis, the great military centre of the country, was provided with three highways, one going north to Sitifis, another to Cirta, and a third to Theveste. This last town was the junction of not less than eight roads, and, during the first century of the Christian era, took rank as one of the most important towns in North Africa. Of any highways in Mauri- tania west of Cassarea we have no mention till a later period. The Tabula Itineraria Peutingeriana, as it is termed, now in the library at Vienna, makes no reference to them, and the Itineraries of Antoninus, in the form handed down to us, throw no light upon the course of any military highways in the western provinces. A dearth of inscriptions in the days of the Caesars leaves us in considerable doubt as to the actual course of many of the roads in more elevated regions, and the absence of milliary columns, so numerous in the time of Trajan and the Antonines, has made it difficult to ascertain the correctness of statements by ancient authors and geographers. Still there is sufficient evidence of the thoughtfulness of the Romans, as a great road-making nation, in covering the country, wherever practicable, with a network of roads, and constructing the chief military highways with such imperishable materials that portions of them remain to the present day. Roman roads in North Africa were of two kinds, either paved with flat stones or macadamised. The paved roads were constructed with stone slabs in squares, or laid diamond-wise. The others were made with broken rubble or gravel, differing from English roads of that type by being laid with cement, and having kerbs of cut stone at the sides. Although the rule of the Caesars may be regarded as experi- mental, yet it laid the foundations of a system of government which resulted in a long era of wealth and prosperity. *Few of the Caesars had personal acquaintance with this splendid append- age to the Empire. Carthage claims the distinction of having been the first Roman colony established out of Italy, and Hadrian was the first of the emperors to make a systematic tour through nearly every part of his dominions ; and, conse- Africa under the Caesars 41 quently, personal acquaintance with the native races he was called upon to govern contributed largely to his success as a ruler of mankind. It is true that Julius Caesar spent three entire years in Africa, but this was in the declining years of the Republic, prior to his assumption of the dictatorship. Many of his successors, too, were acquainted with Africa, having filled the office of proconsul in the earlier portion of their career. The work of Augustus consisted in maturing a system of govern- ment, both civil and military, on the lines laid down by his predecessor, quelling disturbances on the frontier, and forming an African army which was destined to play an important part as the third Augustan legion. We are told that this legion was first quartered in Asia, but, by the orders of Tiberius, was removed to the neighbourhood of Theveste (Tebessa) at the time of the insurrection of Tacfarinas. It appears to have been encamped there till Theveste was rebuilt by Vespasian. Caligula's work in Africa seems to have been restricted to the murder of Ptolemy, the misguided son of Juba II., and the last of a line of Numidian kings. The only act of Claudius worth mentioning was the division of Mauritania into two provinces, but this was an imperial necessity. The record of Galba, like that of Nero, is a blank, although it must be admitted that, as proconsul of / Africa, his career was distinguished for great activity, and by the exercise of sound judgment in the discharge of the duties of his high office. Vitellius also was proconsul in his earlier years, and, notwithstanding the ignominy attached to his name as an emperor, governed Africa with singular integrity for two years, acting in the latter year as deputy for his brother who succeeded him as proconsul. Vespasian's active career of ten years proved of great service in the cause of good government. During his reign the third Augustan legion was established at Theveste, and_, the town rebuilt and enlarged. Among the principal places associated with his name Icosium is worthy of passing mention, especially as its modern representative, the city of Algiers, has played so great a part in the life and progress of North Africa, A modest inscription on a stone built into the wall of a house in Algiers attests the existence of the old Roman town.' Beyond this it has no value. ' /. R. A. No. 4052. Berbrugger, Notice sur les Antiquites Romaines iT Alger, fig. H. 42 Roman Africa P • SITTIO • M ■ F • QVIR PLOCAMIAN ORDO Publio Sittio, Marci filio, Quirina ICOSITANOR tribu, Plocamiano, ordo Icositanor^m, M • SITTIVS • P • F • QVR Marcus Sittius, Publii filius, Quirina CAECILIANVS tribu, Cacilianus pro filio pientissimo PRO • FILIO honore recepto impeTisam remisit. PIENTISSIMO H • R ■ I • R The short rule of Titus, which was conspicuous for propriety and restraint, was followed by the persistent cruelty of his brother Domitian, who brought to a disgraceful end the reign of the twelve Caesars. It has been already observed that there is a dearth of inscrip- tions in North Africa relating to the earlier emperors. Most of those which have been discovered are so fractured as to be scarcely legible, but mention may be made of a slab found at Ain Khenchla, the ancient Mascula, on which is recorded a simple dedication to the Emperor Augustus by the Roman colonists and the natives of that city.' DIVO AVGVSTO SACRVM CONVENTVS CIVIVM ROMANOR ET NVMIDARVM QVI MASCVLAE HABITANT Another inscription of about the same date was found near the ruins of the supposed city of Zama, and is of special interest as a memorial of the celebrated Empress Livia, who exercised her powers of fascination over Augustus, and ultimately became his third wife.^ As Livia died A.D. 29 at the advanced age of eighty- six, it is probable that the dedication is of that year. IVNONI ■ LIVIAE • AVGVSTI • SACRVM L • PASSIENO • RVFO • IMPERATORE AFRICAM OBTINENTE CN • CORNELIVS • CN • F ■ COR • RVFVS ET ■ MARIA • C • F • GALLA • CN CONSERVATI VOTA • L • M ■ SOLVONT ' C. I. L. No. 15775- * C. I. L. No. 16456. The proconsul L. Passienus Rufus was honoured with a triumph on account of his successful rule, and the title of Imperator. Africa under the Caesars 43 Further interest is attached to this, inscription, as it records the name of Rufus Passienus, who achieved great success in the subjugation of Numidia. Tiberius also is represented in the form of a dedication by C. Vibius Marsus, who was proconsul for the third time.^ The slab bearing the inscription was discovered by M. Tissot on a bridge over the river Badja near Vicus Augusti. The date would be A.D. 29-30. TI • CAESAR • DIVI AVG • F ■ AVGVSTVS PONTIF • MAX • TRIE POTEST • XXXI • COS IIII DEDIT C ■ VIBIVS ■ MARSVS • PRO COS • III • DEDIC Another dedication to this Emperor is on a milliarium at Tacape (Gabes) on the road to Capsa, the date, A.D. 14, being the year of his accession on the death of Augustus.^ IMP CAES AVG TIF AVGVSTVS TRI POT XVI L ASPRENAS COS PROCOS VII VIR EPVLONVM VIAM EX CASTR HIBER NIS TACAPES MVNI ENDAM CVRAVIT LEG III AVG CIX A similar one has been brought to light on the same highway, some fifty miles beyond Gabes. The two dedications to the Emperor Claudius have no special interest, and the name of Nerva appears only on one inscription. Of the other Caesars, the names of Titus and Vespasian may be traced on a few much- worn milliaria, and a dedication to the latter by diflamen perpetuus of Chusira, in the province of Byzacene, may still be read on the base of an altar, bearing the date A.D. 70-71. ' C. I. L. No. I43!i6. ^ C. I. L. No. 10018, deciphered by Temple and Wilmanns. Sir Grenville Temple, Excursions in the Mediterranean, London, 1835, vii. p. 321. 44 Roman Africa I The history of Theveste is so associated with the Emperor ! Vespasian that it seems fitting, in this stage of inquiry, to give .^ some little account of its progress and of its many interesting > monumental remains. We have no record of its early career, texcept that it was not occupied by Carthaginians till the first i Punic war ; but its situation, so well adapted for a commercial / centre as well as for a military station, induced the Emperor to , make Theveste the head-quarters of the African legion.' The subjugation of this part of the country was attended with many \ difficulties, chiefly on account of the lawless character of adjacent tribes ; and consequently the presence of a large number of disciplined troops was absolutely necessary for the security of its I inhabitants. Neither Sallust, nor Tacitus, nor Pliny makes mention of Theveste, its name appearing for the first time in the geography of Ptolemy.^ The oldest inscriptions are of the reign of Vespasian, but, with the exception of its being for more than fifty years the chief military centre of Africa, Theveste was of little importance till the close of the second century, when it became one of the richest and most populous of Roman colonies. Among the ruined monuments of the city, none have attracted more attention than the Basilica. Built not later than the end of the first century, and probably commenced during the reign of Vespasian, it appears to have been almost destroyed, with the city itself, during the incursions of the Moors and wild tribes of the Aures in the sixth century. When Solomon, the successor of Belisarius, arrived at the gates of Theveste he found the whole place in ruins ; and we learn from an inscription on a triumphal arch assigned to the third year of Justinian's reign, A.D. 539, that Theveste civitas a fundamentis (Bdificata est? The interpretation by Renier fully attests the rebuilding of the city, and, as Sir Lambert Playfair has observed, this Byzantine inscription is the ' In the reign of Tiberius the imperial army, irrespective of native troops raised in the different provinces, consisted of 25 legions. In the time of Trajan there were 30, and under Septimius Severus 32. Each legion comprised 10 companies, the first company having a full strength of 1,105 infantry and 132 cavalry. In each of the nine other companies there were 555 infantry and 66 cavalr)', altogether 6,600 foot- soldiers and 726 mounted. Each legion was accompanied by 10 great military engines, and 55 catapults for discharging stones and arrows. From Trajan to Con- stantine companies were divided. (Duruy, Histoire Romaine, vol. v. , also Vegetius, Mil. 4, 22.) '^ M. Letronne, Ann. de Const. 1858, p. 29. ' I. R. A. No. 3089. Africa under the Cassars 45 only one yet found in Africa, which makes direct allusion to the expulsion of the Vandals. Nutu divino felicissimis temfioribus piissimorum, dominorum nostrorum Justiniani et Theodora Augustoruni post abscissos ex Africa Vandalos extinctamque ;per Solomonem gloriosissimo magistro militum ex consulte Prafecto Libya ac patricio universam Maurusiam gentem providentia ejusdem aminentissimi viri Theveste civitas a fundamentis adificata est. This Roman Basilica stood on the north side of a forum, approached through two lofty gateways, one of which is still standing. A broad flight of thirteen steps, now partly destroyed, gave access to an open court, 65 feet by 60 feet, surrounded by an arcade. The Basilica had a nave and aisles separated by piers and engaged shafts in two superimposed orders, the whole being arcaded. The nave had an apsidal end, and the aisles had galleries. The material of the walls is a finely grained limestone, in large stones of regular size, the courses being about 20 inches high, and the stones bedded in very little thin mortar. The columns were of granite and grey marble, not fluted, and the capitals of both stages were of the Corinthian order of pure white marble, the carving showing great delicacy of form and execution. The simplicity of the arch construction is remarkable. There were no archivolts, and the faces of the voussoirs were polished like marble. The entire floor surfaces were covered with beautiful mosaics, portions of which are still in fair preservation. It has been suggested that the Basilica of Theveste, as we now see it in ruined condition, was a work of the sixth century, and that Solomon rebuilt it, as well as the city, a fundamentis. Had this been the case, the stones of the older Roman work would have been re-used, and the facework, like other masonry at Theveste of the Byzantine period, would have been irregular. It should be observed that when Constantine removed the seat of empire to Byzantium, A.D. 328, the basilica form of plan, which had been adopted for the purposes of the early Christian Church, underwent many changes, the most noticeable being 46 Roman Africa the introduction of the cupola, which received its full develop- ment under Justinian, two centuries later. And it so happens that the Byzantine restorations at Theveste were commenced the same year that Justinian laid the foundations of the great Basilica of Sta. Sophia. At Theveste the Byzantine additions are clearly distinguishable, the masonry being of a different character and not even attached to the old work. The quatre- foil chapel on the east side, with its adjoining chambers, and approached from an aisle of the Roman basilica by a descent of thirteen steps, was one of these additions. The eight internal shafts of the chapel were of green marble, and the walls to a considerable height were faced with marble. Large quantities of gilt and coloured tesserae having been found on the site favour the supposition that the vaulting, as well as the upper parts of the walls, was decorated with mosaic. The entire floor surface was of mosaic, large fragments still remaining in one of the apses. In the centre of the floor appears to have been a tomb, the enclosing walls being constructed with stones of the Roman period. South of the chapel is a large burial- chamber, in which several tombs were found, bearing inscriptions of the sixth and seventh centuries. Having restored the Basilica, Solomon surrounded it on three sides with shops or small dwellings, portions of which are still standing. He then enclosed the entire ranges of buildings with a wall about 25 feet high, strengthened with numerous towers. This wall of defence is irregularly built' with blocks and slabs of stone in great variety, and the presence of tombstones in the construction seems to indicate that the edifices round the forum had been recklessly destroyed and the materials used for building purposes, The object of Solomon's fortification is not quite clear. He had already enclosed a large portion of the city by a high wall with ramparts, and in the centre had constructed a citadel of great strength. Most of these are still in existence. One may assume, therefore, that in time of siege this fortified Basilica and its surrounding buildings would serve as an additional refuge for the inhabitants of the adjacent settlements. Procopius, in his work entitled ' War with the Vandals,' throws light upon this subject. He tells us that ' inside the walls of Carthage is a church, under the charge of men devoted to the service of God, whom we call monks. Solomon, who had built this church a Africa under the Caesars 47 little time before, surrounded it with walls in order that, in case of necessity, it might serve as a fortress. Areobindas, governor of Africa, took refuge there, having previously sent his wife and his sister.' The work at Theveste fully bears out this description. Among other monumental remains of this city the quadri- frontal arch of the time of Caracalla is a conspicuous object, and demands notice on account of the rarity of this form of architectural composition. It will compare favourably with the arch of Janus at Rome, but is in every way inferior to a similar edifice at Tripoli. From inscriptions we learn the complete history of the structure, how the youngest of three brothers, members of a wealthy family at Theveste, bequeathed all his pro- perty to his two brothers on condition of their erecting a triumphal arch in his native town, to be surmounted by two tetrastyles ' enclosing statues of the two Augusti. This Caius Cornelius Egrilianus, who commanded the 14th legion Gemina, quartered in Pannonia, must have been a man of considerable substance, for in addition to this munificent bequest he enjoined his brothers to place in ^^ forum statues of Juno and Minerva, to appropriate a sum of 250,000 sesterces for the purpose of afford- ing free baths to the inhabitants in the public Therinm, and lastly 170 pounds weight of silver and 14 pounds weight of ' A tetrastyle is a square edifice, adorned with four columns, surmounted by a dome or cupola {tholus). It was sometimes called adicula tetrastyla, and frequently a statue of marble or bronze was placed within it. Here is an inscription found at Constantine relating to the dedication of a tetrastyle with a tholus (Archceolog. Joum. vol. xxix. 1882) : — C • IVLIVS Q • F • QVIR POTITVS TETRASTV LVM • ET THOLVM D • E • D The word tholus is correct Latin, signifying a round roof or a cupola. The word cupola is of Arabic origin. Tholus is applicable to a building of circular form, having the same meaning as SiKns, which was used with reference to the round chamber or rotunda at Athens, in which the Prytanes dined. Cupola, like alcove and the verb ' to cove,' is derived from the Arabic word gobba, which was originally applied to the hump on a camel's back, and afterwards to the cup-shaped tents of nomadic tribes. This word is now pronounced ' koubba,' and is applied generally to native tombs roofed with a cupola. The Italian language retains the word, in its primitive signification, vagobbo, a hunchback. 48 Roman Africa gold were to be deposited in the Capitol for purposes that this much-worn inscription fails to enlighten us about. The rendering of the inscription, that may still be read on the left side as one passes out of the modern town (Tebessa), has proved an attractive study to many eminent epigraphists, including Renier, Wilmanns, and Mommsen.' According to the last two the wording is as follows : — Ex testamento C. Cornell Egriliani, prafecti legionis XII I I Gemince : quo testamento ex US CCL millibus nummum arcum cmn statuis Augus- torum in ietrastylis duobus cum statuis Junonis et Minerva, qua in foro fieri pracepit, prater alia HS CCL millia numm,tnn, qua rei pmblica ita ut certis diebus gymnasia populo publice in thertnis praberentur legavit, datasque ad Kapitolium argenti libras CLXX, id est lances IIII . . . ef auri libras XII I I, id est pihalas (sic) III, scyphos II fieri iussit; qua omnia diligenier secundum voluniatem eius in contione . . . Cornell Fortunatus et Qulntus fratres et heredes conslgnaverunt et opus perfecerunt. The reading by Renier varies in a few particulars, the most noteworthy being in the third line, cum statuis divi Severi et Minerva. The substitution of the goddess Juno for the Emperor Septimius Severus is immaterial, though it should be observed that the defaced portion of the stonework at this part of the inscription would admit the insertion of the words divi Severi. This monument is commonly known as the Arch of Caracalla, the two Augusti referred to in the testament being Caracalla and his brother Geta. It appears to have been built just after the murder of Geta by his brother, A.D. 2 1 2. The eastern fagade has an inscription dedicated to Severus, father of the Augusti,^ and on the keystone of the arch is the head of an emperor enclosed in a medallion and resting on the head of Medusa. DIVO • PIO ■ SEVERO • PATRI IMP • CAES • M • AVRELI ■ SEVERI ■ ANTONINI PII • FELICIS • AVG • ARAB ■ ADIAB • PARTH • MAX • BRIT ■ MAX • GERM • MAX • PONT ■ MAX • TRIE ■ POT • XVII • IMP II COS IIII • PROCOS • P ■ P • On the frieze of the west fagade is a dedication in honour of Julia Domna, wife of Severus and mother of the Augusti.' ■The bust sculptured on the keystone, representing a young ' C. I. L. No. 1858 ; /. R. A. No. 3085. ■^ I. R. A. No. 3087. . ^ I. R. A. No. 3088. w H in > a H H <: < 1-1 <: u < < o fa o X u pi < < H Z O si Q w X H Africa under the Caesars 49 female surmounting an eagle on a thunderbolt, cannot be intended for the Empress, who at the date of the erection of this monument had already passed middle age. It was probably a symbol of Theveste as a young and rising city. IVLIAE • DOMNAE • AVG • MATRI CASTRORVM ■ ET • AVG • ET • SEN ET • PATRIAE The inscription on the south fa9ade is illegible, and on the northern side no longer exists, this part of the edifice having been restored in recent times. Both these inscriptions were probably in honour of Caracalla and Geta. The peculiarities of this architectural composition are the exceptional width of the frieze, and the absence of an attic — a marked feature in triumphal arches. For the latter, two tetrastyles, as a crowning feature of the edifice, are substituted. It has been suggested that there were similar tetrastyles on each of the four facades, but there is no mention of that number on any inscription or document, nor is there any indication on the monument itself of there having been more than the two mentioned in the testament of Caius Cornelius Egrilianus. Triumphal arches form a class of monuments that is ex- clusively Roman. The Greeks raised columns in honour of men distinguished in war and intellectual attainments, bearing out a statement by Pliny the Elder, Columnarum ratio erat attolli supra ceteros mortales, quod et arcus significant novitio invento. Arches came in with the Empire as permanent structures. In the days of the Republic they were made of wood, after the manner of the Etruscans, and, like similar erections of our own time, were taken down on completion of a public ceremony.' These monumental gateways, which generally served as ap- ' It may be as well to quote the opinion expressed by Gibbon on Roman triumphs, which is generally accepted : ' A Roman triumph could only be obtained by the conquerors of nations who had never previously acknowledged the authority of the Romans ; the reduction of a revolted province did not suffice ; the Senate took no account of victories which did not extend the frontiers of the Empire. This seems to have been the rule ; but when Titus and his father triumphed over the Jews, and when the Senate commemorated their victories by medals and that triumphal arch which has subsisted to the present day, they did nothing more than triumph over a revolted province, which had been subdued by the arms of Pompey, and governed by Roman magistrates for the space of fifty years.' (Gibbon, Miscellaneous Works, Classical, vol. iv. p. 369. ) E 5Q Roman Africa proaches to cities and towns, are very numerous in North Africa. It would be safe to assert that one or more are to be found in every town, however remote or little known. At Lambaesis for instance, no less than forty arches were traced by Peysonnel 150 years ago, and fourteen were then still standing. There is no reason to suppose that they formed part of the enclosure of a walled town. Those that have been discovered in Africa are all isolated structures, though in some instances the defensive walls built during the Byzantine occupation have been brought close up to them on both sides. This remark is equally applicable to triumphal arches generally in the various provinces of the Empire. The cost of their erection was sometimes de- frayed by the inhabitants of a town who wished to honour a victorious emperor, and sometimes by private individuals. At Seressitanum, for instance, a small town in the interior, long forgotten and now a mass of ruins, there are the remains of four triumphal arches. One of these, according to an inscription found some fifty years ago, was the gift of a citizen, the cost being borne by himself, his mother, and his sister ; and the edifice, when completed, was surmounted, as the two last lines inform us, by a quadriga at the public expense.' TESTAMENTO C ■ M FELICIS ARMENIANI EQVO • PVBLICO • ADLECTI • OPTIMAE lAE ■ CIVIS • ARCVS AD ■ CVIVS • ORNAMENTA ARMENIA • AVGE • MATER • ET ■ BEBINIA • PAVLIANA SOROR • LIBERALITATE • SVA HS XXV MIL N EROGAVERVNT • ET • DIE • DEDIC • SPORTVLAS • DECV RIONIS ■ ET • EPVLVM ■ ET • GVMNASIVM • MVNICIPIB DEDERVNT ITEM • MVNICIPIVM ■ SERESSITANVM ■ AD • AMPLIANDA ORNAMENTA • QVADRIGAM • PVBLICA • PEC • FEC Another edifice at Theveste worthy of a notice is a little tetrastyle temple, apparently dedicated to Minerva or Jupiter. The date of its erection is about A.D. 300. Although in a ruinous condition externally, its portico being kept standing by the aid of iron straps and rods, modern ingenuity has utilised the building for a variety of purposes never dreamt of by its pious > C. I. L. No. 937. Victor Guerin, Voyage archiologique dans la Rigence de Tunis, Paris, 1862, vol. ii. p. 354- l^^^g^^^J^^g^^^^^^lj V." . \ ' i TEMPLE Oh MLNLRVA AT THEVESTE (Resloreii). T Africa under the Caesars 51 founders. It was at one time a soap factory, then converted into a prison, and at a subsequent date did duty as a canteen. Lastly, as a bit of irony that could not be exceeded, this temple of the gods was converted into a parish church, and fitted up for that purpose in the worst possible taste. Little wonder that, after undergoing so many vicissitudes, a doubt has been ex- pressed as to the name of the deity in whose honour this sanctuary was founded ! But it is an interesting edifice, and, like the triumphal arch of Caracalla, shows a departure from the recognised proportions and treatment of a Classic order. It stands on a podium, twelve feet high, and is approached by a broad flight of stone steps. Originally there was an enclosing wall, the space in front of the temple being about 80 feet and at the sides 50 feet. Like other large Roman towns, Theveste had a forum, civile and a forum venule. The former, according to Vitruvius, was usually surrounded by public buildings, such as the basilica, the curia, the mint, or the prison. At Theveste the open court on the south of the basilica, measuring about 180 feet by 165 feet, was undoubtedly the forum civile, but all traces of buildings at the southern end have disappeared. The other forum was probably removed by Solomon, on account of its obstructing his lines of defence. It occupied the open space, now planted with trees, in front of the modern citadel. LThe beneficent rule of the aged Nerva, who succeeded the t and worst of the twelve Caesars, was too short for the display of any activity in the African provinces. But it was marked by the establishment of a colony of veterans in a town of old Numidia, which has retained to the present day its name and prosperity. The ancient Sitifis CSetif), as Ptolemy the geographer informs us, was an important mercantile town long before the arrival of the Romans. Its admirable situation on high table-land, 3,570 feet above the sea-level, in the midst of fertile plains, with a soil capable of producing cereals and fruit and oil in abundance, and at the junction of no less than nine highways communicating with every part of the country, made Sitifis a commercial centre at a very early period. The dis- covery of more than 250 inscribed stones on the site of the old town gives an insight into its long career of prosperity and the lives of its inhabitants. The very few memorials of soldiers or 52 Roman Africa their families seem to indicate that the population was civil, and not military, during the Roman occupation. From one of the inscriptions we learn that Nerva conferred on the town the title of Colonia Nerviana Augusta Martialis Veteranorum Siti- fensium. There are inscriptions also relating to the erection of a theatre, an amphitheatre, and several temples ; also the dedication of statues of the Emperors Trajan, Hadrian, An- toninus, M. Aurelius, and L. Verus. The town was embellished with noble monuments, and marble and mosaic were freely used in its public buildings. Many of the votive tablets were en- riched with sculpture, and, from the character of the inscriptions generally, we may assume that a high tone of culture prevailed among the inhabitants. One memorial in the public gardens is worth noticing. It is a dedication by one Maurusius, apparently a Moor, to his two beloved children, Prsetorianus and Prima, a boy and a girl. The father indicates with precision and loving care the exact time of their decease. He educates his son for a notarius (secretary), and sends him to Rome, where he died, A.D. 225, at the age of seventeen.' MEMORIAE MEMORIAE PRAETORIAN I PRIMAE FILI DVLCISSI FILIAE DVL MI HOMINI CISSIMAE INGENIOSIS V ■ AN • VIII • M • V. SIMO NOTA DECESSIT V KAL RIO V • AN • XVII SEPT • A • P • CLXXXVII M • VIII • D • XVII • ROMAE DECESSIT • XV • K • NOV • A • P • CLXXXVI. MAVRVSIVS FILIS At all times an agricultural town, it is not surprising to find that Saturn, the deity of agriculture of the Latins, figures largely in many dedications, and the names of Saturus and Saturninus given to many residents in the city and the neighbourhood. Sitifis has had a long history, but during its occupation as a Roman colony was not associated with any great movement, nor with any change in its constitution, till the time of Dio- cletian at the close of the third century. At that period a great increase in the population of Mauritania Caesariensis rendered a division of the province necessary. Diocletian, therefore, gave ' C. I. L. No. 8501. Mauritanie Charienne, par Ed. Cat, Paris, 1891, p. 164. Africa under the Caesars 53 the name of Mauritania Sitifensis to the eastern portion, with Sitifis for a capital, and retained the old name for the western portion, with Caesarea for its capital as heretofore. But the separation must have been more nominal than real, for the two provinces had the same troops, and sometimes they were both administered by the same governor. Sitifis suffered during the insurrection of Firmus, the chief of a powerful Moorish tribe, A.D. 369, and was partly destroyed by an earthquake, A.D. 419. Like most of the cities and towns in North Africa, it fell a victim to the Vandal and Arab invasions, but recovered its position at a later period. In the Middle Ages it was still prosperous, for El Bekri speaks of Sitifis as in a flourishing condition and thickly populated. But in his time the city walls, which had been noted for great solidity and thoroughly restored during the Byzantine occupation, no longer existed. The history of the rise, progress, and decline of a people is •generally divided into periods, sometimes dynastic, at other times tribal or accidental. Roman history, after the fall of the Republic, is divisible into several periods. We have the Empire under the Caesars, including the Flavian epoch, which covers twenty-seven years under the reigns of Vespasian, Titus, and Domitian. The line of the so-called twelve Caesars terminates with Domitian, but Nero, as the last representative of the Julian family, should be the sixth and last of the Caesars, his successors, Galba and Otho, who preceded the Flavian family, being created emperors for their services to the State, and not for dynastic or family reasons., After the twelve Caesars we have the rule of the Emperors Nerva, Trajan, and Hadrian, all raised to the purple for distinguished services, civil or military, f Then came the age of the Antonines under the imperial rule of Antoninus Pius, Marcus Aurelius, Lucius Verus, and Commodus. And lastly a long line of emperors, selected sometimes on the score of distinction in the Senate or on the field of battle, but generally as nominees of party factions. This last period covers more than 263 years, commencing with the death of Commodus and terminating with the occupation of Carthage by Genseric, A.D. 439, and the sacking of Rome, A.D. 455. In the first chapter of this outline of North African history, an attempt has been made to trace the causes which contributed to the invasion of the country and its occupation by the Romans. 54 Roman Africa Its progress under the Caesars, the successful establishment of a form of government adapted to the traditional habits of the native races, and the permanent settlement of a military force on the frontier, have been the subject of inquiry in this second chapter. We have now reached a period which demands more than one chapter for its special consideration — a long era of peace and prosperity, of good government, and of a higher tone prevailing in municipal as well as in domestic life. Verily for Africa this was the Golden Age of Empire. 55 CHAPTER III AFRICA UNDER TRAJAN A.D. 97-117 The history of North Africa, during the eighty-three years that Trajan and his three successors sat on the throne of the Czesars, may truly be said to be written on stone. In nearly every province of the Empire, which extended almost to the gates of India, the names of these illustrious rulers figure, largely on ruined monuments in far distant lands. In Africa this is especially the case. Were it not for inscriptions on panel or frieze, on milliary stone or votive pedestal, we should have but a poor record of Trajan's magnificence as a ruler, or of his solicitude for the welfare of his colonists and protection of native tribes. Nor should we have reliable information about the honours bestowed upon him by all classes of his subjects for deeds of thoughtfulness and beneficence. Among the first acts of Trajan's reign was the regulating the supply of corn from Africa, and framing edicts for the administration of justice to the producer and the merchant in their commercial transactions with Rome. For a long period not only Rome, but Italy also, had depended upon large shipments of corn from abroad, and had looked to Egypt and Africa for one third at least of their annual requirements, equivalent to about six million bushels. Italy and Spain provided the rest. The African provinces were called upon to deliver a certain amount of produce in the form of imperial tribute, under the superintendence of a high func- tionary who resided at Carthage. Some years ago M. Renier discovered at Kalama (Guelma) an inscription of the time of Trajan, which clearly showed that this important officer of state was charged with the control of the wheat supply to the metro- polis. The small amount produced in Italy was only sufficient for the soldiers. War in Africa meant famine in Rome, and this was an evil to be guarded against at all costs. Historians 56 Roman Africa inform us of scarcity and distress in the reigns of Augustus and Tiberius. Under Claudius there was dearth of corn for three consecutive years, and famine caused great hardship in various parts of the Empire during the rule of Domitian and some of his successors. Under the later emperors there are records of several others, but one may reasonably suppose that the admirable system of corn storage in years of plenty, inaugurated by Trajan, lessened the evil in a time of need. During his strug- gles with Caesar Pompey stopped the export. Such was the distress in the capital that the populace implored Csesar to terminate his differences with his rival. A treaty was then arranged, the chief condition being that grain-ships were to be allowed to leave the African ports and to cross the Mediter- ranean unmolested. It is difficult in these days of abundant food supply, and with the control of so large a portion of the earth's surface to meet the growing requirements of mankind, to measure the anxiety of the Roman people when the days of harvesting were drawing near. Their very existence was at one period at the mercy of the waves, and tempestuous weather off the ports of Africa or on the coasts of Sicily and Spain was too often the cause of deep anxiety in the metropolis.' As far back as the time of Caius Gracchus, the socialist of his time and hero of the hour, poor citizens were allowed their doles of wheat at half the current prices in the market, and what were known as tessercB frumentaria, equivalent to modern soup and coal tickets, were distributed freely by civil functionaries to all persons in need. So pauperising a measure attracted to the capital the idle and worthless from all parts of Italy, and ultimately created an evil which the earlier emperors had great difficulty in checking. It was not likely that the populace would remain satisfied till they had ultimately acquired the right of demanding bread unstinted and without payment, nor was it possible for the resources of the treasury to be equal to supplying a demand which was both arbitrary and impolitic. In the last days of the Republic no less than 320,000 persons claimed their weekly doles, and it required all the popularity of a Caesar and the combined efforts ' Tacitus, Ann. iii. 54 • Vita populi Romani per incerta maris et tempestatum quotidie volvitur. Africa under Trajan 57 of the Senate and the wealthier classes to reduce the number to 150,000. This number was increased to 200,000 by Augus- tus, who, according to Suetonius, was personally inclined to abolish for ever this objectionable custom.' The general fertility and capabilities of the soil of North Africa are attested by numerous authors. According to Plutarch, the town of Leptis alone, after Caesar's decisive victory at Thapsus, was condemned to a fine of 2,500,000 pounds of oil ; and Hirtius, who accompanied Caesar on this expedition, tells us that this was a very moderate demand. The use of oil was indispensable for lamps as well as for baths. For the latter purpose the consumption in the days of the Caesars was enor- mous, and the production of this article, imposed as a tax on Africa for the benefit of Rome, amounted annually to about 300,000 English gallons. Tacitus also mentions that Vespasian, in disputing the throne with Vitellius, conceived the project of invading Africa by sea and land, and seizing the granaries. On the death of his rival he charged with wheat every ship of the Empire. At Rusicada (Philippeville) may still be seen the remains of enormous granaries ; and we learn that when Caesar's army landed in the neighbourhood of Leptis, an immense wheat supply stored at Thysdrus (El-Djem) was placed at the service of the troops. Pliny the Elder is profuse in his praises of Africa, and tells us that the climate is so good, so kind, and so beneficial, that after the seed is sown the land is not visited for nine months, and then the corn is cut down and laid on the threshing-floors ; the reason being that the drought keeps down all weeds, and the dews that fall by night are sufficient to refresh and nourish the corn. In another of his comments ^ he says that there is a city called Tacape (Gabes) in the midst of the sands, the neigh- bourhood of which is so fruitful that it passes wonder and is incredible. There may be seen a mighty date-tree under which grows an olive, under that a fig-tree, and that overspreads a pomegranate under the shade whereof is a vine, and under the compass thereof they sow corn and then herbs, all in one and the same year. The vines in the neighbourhood bear twice a year and yield ripe grapes for a double vintage. Once again, ' Suetonius, Aug. 42. '' Pliny, Hiit. Nat. xviii. 22. 58 Roman Africa Pliny refers to the land of Byzatium or Byzacene,' which was represented on Roman coins in the guise of a young girl with her arms full of wheatsheaves, and says that when the season is dry the strongest team of oxen cannot plough it, but that after one good shower one poor ass with the help of a silly old woman will be enough, as he has observed many a time and often. The Emperor Commodus, whose reign was not remarkable for acts of munificence or utility, built a fleet of ships especially for the grain supply. He had an African and an Alexandrian fleet. It was in a ship of the latter, whose sign was Castor and Pollux, that St. Paul embarked from Malta when he was journeying to Syracuse. In the fourth century, especially during the reign of Constantine, wheat from Egypt was shipped entirely to Constantinople, and wheat from Africa supplied the Roman markets. In the time of Caesar a maximum price of wheat was fixed in Rome, and certain ports were named on the coast of Italy to which it should be exclusively shipped. This arbitrary measure, which appears to have been in force more than a century, was little in accord with the statesmanlike views which characterised the Emperor Trajan in all his public acts. He abolished restrictions, declined to fix a legal price for any articles of production, and allowed shippers and merchants to adopt their own methods in all commercial transactions. The merits of this enlightened policy were put to a severe test on one occasion during his reign. The waters of the Nile had refused to rise, and famine in the land of Egypt seemed immi- nent. But wheat from Africa and Sicily came of their abun- dance to the ports of Italy, and there was enough to spare for the distressed population of Alexandria. We cannot wonder at the interest taken in those days in the shipment of grain, ' The region called Byzacene was originally inhabited by a Libyan people called Byzantes, and comprised the southern portion of Africa Provincia. At a later date it became a distinct province, with the title of Provincia Byzacena. It was separated from Tripolitana by the river Triton, and the marshes Palus Tritonis, with a stretch of desert on the south and south-west, formed a natural boundary. Hadrumetum (Susa) was the capital. Other important towns on the coast were AchoUa (no existing remains), Leptis minor (Lemta), Ruspina (Monastir), Thapsus (Ras Dimas), add Thense (Henchir Tina). In the interior of the country were Assuras (Zanfour), Capsa (Gafsa), Sufetula (Sbeitla), Terebintha (no existing remains), and Thysdrus (El-Djem). All these were flourishing towns till the fall of the Empire. Africa under Trajan 59 nor can we be surprised at reading that the safe arrival of the fleet at a certain period of the year was a matter of grave anxiety to the people of Rome. From Seneca we have a graphic description of the arrival of the Alexandrian fleet in the port of Puteoli, how the population mounted the hill-tops in expectation, how they scanned the broad waters for the first glimpse of the convoy, and how great the rejoicing when the laden vessels were brought safely into harbour. Similar scenes occurred at the still more important port of Ostia at the mouth of the Tiber. Any one who has visited in recent times this almost deserted sand-choked region, with its silent waters and still more silent plains, experiences a difficulty in conjuring up from these mute surroundings a picture of Ostia of old times — the port of Rome, and the pride of the Emperors. Undulations of the surface and fragments of marble and pottery upturned by the plough or spade are the chief indication of the old city buried far below. The harbour which Claudius caused to be made for his increasing fleet, and the splendid pentagonal basin of Trajan's time, may still be traced on the marshy land which has swallowed up the Mediterranean on these inhospitable shores. And the foundations of the great granaries which stored the wheat supply of Northern Africa are there to tell their own tale of a period of marked prosperity and great commercial activity.^ From the epistles of Pliny the Yoynger and his panegyric on his noble patron we obtain an insight into the principles which actuated Trajan in his government of the provinces of the Empire. Africa and Asia were the two senatorial provinces of the first rank, and, as Roman colonies were more numerous in Africa, we may assume that this enlightened ruler adopted a large-minded policy in so important an adjunct of his dominions. Had Pliny been governor of a province of Mauri- tania in Africa instead of Bithynia in Asia, we should have been acquainted with many subjects which can only be in- ' Ostia and its remains have been an attractive field for archaeologists of many countries. The intelligent labours of Visconti, Canina, and Texier have thrown con- siderable light on the history and value of Ostia and its harbours in the days of the Empire. And so eminent an authority on all questions of Roman archaeology as Signor Lanciani has cleared up many points in numerous papers on the subject, fully attesting the splendour of Ostia at the commencement of the second century. ( Vide Lanciani, Ancient Rome, pp. 235-246. ) 6o Roman Africa differently explained by an interpretation of fragmentary inscriptions found in the country. Anyhow, the letters addressed to Trajan and the Emperor's replies to his dear ' Secundus ' are of special interest, because they convey a faith- ful impression of the manners of the time and the honest attempts to do justice to every subject of the Empire. It must, however, be borne in mind that Pliny was not only the governor or proconsul of Bithynia, but that he acted as the Emperor's own lieutenant with extraordinary powers, and was privileged to hold direct communication with his august master on all matters relating to his office. From the time of Augustus the proconsuls had ruled over the provinces more or less despotically. When any of the Emperors exercised arbitrary powers in Rome by exorbitant demands, or exacted heavy tribute from the more prosperous colonies, the proconsuls, after satisfying the needs of the imperial treasury, did not hesitate to serve their own interests. To plunder the towns seemed to be one of the duties of their high office, till at last the title of proconsul became identified with robbery and extortion. So long as the farmers of taxes throughout the Empire paid certain fixed sums into the treasury at Rome, and gave security for the payment, the proconsuls did not trouble themselves about the way in which taxes were collected. If the collector suc- ceeded in enriching himself at the expense of the people, the proconsul expected to share the plunder. As a governor invested with almost despotic powers he could prevent extor- tion, but ultimately found it to his interest to promote it ; and as a senator he was not amenable to the ordinary laws, but was responsible to the Senate only for his actions. Tacitus tells us that in the western provinces of Mauritania Csesarea and Tingitana, plunder and depredation were tacitly recognised. Nero placed the former under the governorship of Albinus, who was master of a considerable body of troops, with nume- rous auxiliary companies raised in the country, all of whom lived more or less by rapine and depredation.^ Nerva was the first Emperor to initiate a better order of things, but to Trajan may be credited the, establishment of a form of provincial government, which was honourable in the demands made upon his subjects, progressive in its policy, and inimical to all kinds ' Tacitus, Hist. ii. 58-59. Africa under Trajan 6i of corruption and bribery. An outcry against the exactions of a provincial governor reached its climax during his reign, when the Emperor was petitioned by his African subjects to bring to trial Marius Priscus, the proconsul of Africa, and his lieutenant Hostilius Firmanus, on the ground of their cruel and extortion- ate demands. Both Pliny and Tacitus held briefs for the unfortunate provincials, and the hearing of the case, which lasted three days before the Senate in Rome, was under the presidency of the Emperor Trajan himself, as Consul. From Pliny we learn that his speech for the plaintiffs occupied five hours, and from the graphic description of the trial in two of his letters we may assume that he acted as his own special reporter. Anyhow, the petitioners won their case. M. Priscus was mulcted in a heavy fine and was banished ; and H. Firmanus was declared incapable of serving as a proconsul. To wind up the whole matter, Pliny tells us with pardonable pride that both he and Tacitus received the congratulations of the Senate for their successful impeachment of two such distinguished officers. The trial was remarkable on account of the high position of M. Priscus, who had been Consul, and was a person of great distinction. Similar proceedings, we are told, were taken against Julius Barrus, governor of Bithynia, and Rufus Varenus.' Such praiseworthy endeavours to administer justice to all classes in every part of the Empire are fully corroborated in the correspondence between Trajan and his friend the pro- consul of Bithynia. When Pliny petitioned the Emperor to sanction the introduction of Roman methods of local govern- ment to displace the irregular systems in operation in various parts of the province, Trajan replied that it seemed best, and was even the safest way, to leave each city to exercise its own peculiar laws. On another occasion when Pliny complained to the Emperor of the ruinous condition of the bath at Prusa (Broussa), and asked his approval of its being rebuilt, ' Yes,' said Trajan, ' provided no new tax be levied for this purpose, nor any of those taken off which are appropriated to necessary services.' Only once did the Emperor appear to show any signs of irritation with his exacting correspondent. ' The theatre and gymnasium in course of construction at Nicaea,' ' Pliny. These names appear in several letters. 62 Roman Africa said Pliny, ' are being built on marshy ground, and the walls are already cracked. The gymnasium is not only of irregular shape, but it is badly planned. The present architect, who is a rival of the one first engaged on the work, tells me that the foundations, which are twenty feet thick and loosely built, are unequal to support the superstructure. Send me some archi- tects from Italy to advise me in the matter, which is urgent.' Trajan's reply was very brief. ' As to architects,' said the Emperor, ' there is no province which has not trained men of skill and ingenuity to do what you require. Such experts are not produced in Italy. We have several in Rome, but they come to us from Greece.' ' The confidence inspired by the just and beneficent rule of Trajan soon spread to the more distant parts of the Empire. The magic of his name, associated with unbounded success as a warrior, checked the turbulent tribes on the frontiers of his African provinces ; and the native races subject to the will of Rome were left to cultivate their fields in peace, or change a nomadic life for one of settlement in towns and villages. Public works were in progress everywhere, roads were multiplied or repaired, and harbours constructed or enlarged. With the aid of the renowned Apollodorus of Damascus, the great architect of his time, rivers were spanned by stately bridges far exceeding in magnificence anything the world had ever seen ; triumphal arches — tributes of gratitude to a wise and thoughtful Emperor — graced the entry of provincial towns ; and temples and theatres, baths and aqueducts, rose, as if by magic, to do honour to the Emperor in his lifetime. But the name of Trajan, as a patron of architecture and a man of princely tastes, will for ever be associated with the great forum at Rome which bears his name, and with the stately column which has happily defied the ravages of time. When the Emperor Constantius IL made his triumphal entry into Rome A.D. 356, he stood amazed at the beauty and grandeur of the forum, with its splendid embellishments in marble and stone. In despair of ever doing anything that would rival such magnificence, he said, as he turned away, that he would be content to match the horse which figured in the equestrian statue of Trajan. ' You can ' This letter of Trajan's testifies to the widespread influence of Hellenic art, and the indebtedness of the Roman world to the more cultured Greek. Africa under Trajan 63 imitate the horse,' said the Persian prince Hormisdas, who accompanied him, ' but how about the stable ? ' It is also stated that when the Persian was asked on a subsequent occa- sion what he thought of Rome, he replied, ' I am trying to forget that men are but mortal.' In his epitome of the history of Rome Eutropius speaks of Trajan as orbem terrarum cBdifi- cans, but he might have coupled his name with that of Hadrian, his successor, as his equal in the encouragement given to the building of public monuments worthy of a great Empire. To the honour of Trajan it may be said that he raised these costly edifices for the people and not for himself, and that during the twenty years he sat on the throne of the Caesars not one single gallery or room of state was added to the imperial palace on the Palatine hill. But his name, inscribed on marble or stone, was so much in evidence everywhere that Constantine, two centuries later, humorously compared it to the pellitory on the wall. Yet with all this magnificence Art in Trajan's time was not the Art of the Augustan age. It had lost its vitality, and the high ideal inherited from the Greeks had departed. Human thought, said Plutarch, had descended from its throne and had wings no longer. ' Poetry did not hold the same place in the Roman mind,' says an intelligent French author. ' Elo- quent prose was heard where song was once triumphant. The gods had departed, and mortals only remained. In art as in policy the era of Trajan was one of truth, but not of the ideal ; of good sense, but not of genius.' ' There were several cities and towns in Roman Africa which became associated with Trajan's name on account of some public work or act of watchful benevolence. Leptis Magna, for instance, was favoured by his notice, and coins were struck in his honour bearing the words Colonia Ulpia Traiana Leptis. Mention should also be made of Hippo Diarrhytus or Hippo Zarytus (Bizerta), which was founded by some Phoenician colo- nists from Tyre at an early date, and subsequently became a commercial port under the rule of Carthage. Its importance for strategic purposes attracted the attention of Agathocles, who invaded Africa B.C. 309. He remained there long enough to fortify the town and construct a harbour, of which the lines ' Le Comte de Champagny, Les Antonins, Paris, 1875, vol. i. p. 387. 64 Roman Africa can still be traced. According to Pliny, Hippo was a well- known colony in his time : est in Africa Hipponensis colonia mari proxima. And he adds, Adjacet ei navigabile stagnum, ex quo in modum fluminis, czstuarium emergit quod, vice alterna, prout cBSius aut repressit aut impulit, nunc infertur mari, nunc redditur stagno} With reference to this latter quotation, M. V. Gu^rin remarks that the statement is perfectly correct. Any one who has visited Bizerta must have noticed the currents spoken of by Pliny, as moving sometimes one way and some- times the other. The sea enters the lake by two branches of a canal when the wind is westerly, and when it is in a contrary direction the current is reversed. The monumental remains of Hippo have entirely disappeared, the materials having been re-used in the construction of the uninteresting Arab town of Bizerta. Two inscriptions were discovered here about forty years ago by M. Gu6rin, one being on a milliary column dedicated to Marcus Aurelius, and the other on a block of marble from some edifice presented to the colony by the inhabitants of an adjacent colony styled Julia Carpitana, near Carthage.^ IMP • CAES GENIO • COL • IVLIAE M • AVRELIVS HIPP • DIARR • SACR ANTONINVS COLONI ■ COL • IVLIAE PIVS ■ FELIX • AVG CARPIT PARTHICVS • MAX GVLV GERMAN I CVS • MA X QVIS TRIE • POT • XVIII IVSTISSIMIS COS • nil • P • P D ■ D • P ■ P RESTITVIT XLIX This town still preserves its ancient name of Carpis, pro- nounced by the Arabs Kourbis. The city of Hippo received the affix of Zarytus to distinguish it from Hippo Regius (Bone), the word Zarytus being translated by the Greeks into SidppvTos (diarrhytus), on account of a canal which passed through the town. Hadrumetum (Susa) is another town of importance which bears testimony to the beneficence of Trajan and to its rank as a colony, Coloni Colonics Concordice Ulpics Trajance Augustce Pliny, Epist. ix. 33. ^ V. Gu&in, vol. ii. pp. 22-23. Africa under Trajan 65 FrugifercB Hadrumetince. According to Sallust it existed as a PhcEnician colony before Carthage, and its original name is supposed to have been Adrymes or Adramytos. It was the capital of Byzacene and suffered terribly during the campaign of Julius Caesar. As a city of wealth it was condemned to pay a heavy fine at the close of the war. Procopius speaks of Hadrumetum in the sixth century as a large and populous town. It was destroyed by the Vandals, but rebuilt and fortified by the Byzantines. For a short period it changed its name to Justiniana in compliment to the Emperor, and in later times became conspicuous as a seat of Christianity and the residence of a bishop. It is difficult, in the present day, to trace the lines of the Cothon or harbour mentioned by Hirtius, or the position of the eight gates described by El-Bekri, as well as of the immense tower at the entrance of the harbour called Dar-es- Senaa (signifying arsenal, and from which our word is probably derived). M. Daux, who made a special study of Phoenician remains at Hadrumetum, as well as of other places and emporia on the coast already referred to, says that the Byzantine oc- cupation was most destructive. The exactions of Justinian, under pretence that money was wanting for reconstructing the defences of the country, while it really went to swell the cofTers of the insatiable Emperor at Byzantium, drove away the popula- tion. Procopius, the historian of the time, says that five millions left the country, but this is probably an exaggeration. During the Byzantine occupation, which was purely military, the in- cursions of the Moors proved a source of considerable trouble. The Christian population was roused to action, and for protec- tion they constructed a class of buildings outside the towns, answering the double purpose of convents and fortresses, of which mention has been already made. The occupants were soldier- monks, and the buildings, which were enclosed by surrounding walls of defence, were called Monasteria. Several of these still exist. There is one at Leptis Parva (Lemta) ; another at Ruspina (actually Monastir, to which it gave the name) ; and another at Hadrumetum called Kasr-er-Ribat, mentioned by El-Bekri. This was partly reconstructed by a prince of the Aghlabite dynasty A.D. 827, and converted by the disciples of Mahomet into a place of retirement for marabouts. There are also the remains of two other monasteria on the coast between F 66 Roman Africa Hadrumetum and Carthage. The internal arrangement of these buildings was similar, and for the most part consisted of a series of vaulted chambers, which were originally occupied by foreign mercenaries in the pay of Carthage. These chambers were afterwards converted into cells for monks. This hybrid institu- tion was the origin of orders of a similar kind so celebrated in the Middle Ages, and especially familiar to us under the names of Templars and Knights of St. John. Among the many useful arts which are associated with the Roman name, and received direct encouragement from Trajan, that of road-making stands pre-eminent. In the days of the Republic the maintenance and repair of public highways and streets were under the charge of censors, the highest rank in the magistracy of Rome. From the time of Augustus roads were of three classes : publicce, sometimes designated as consulares, militares, or pratorice ; privatcz, sometimes called agrarice ; and vicinales. The first were under the charge of men of praetorian rank, to whom two Hctors were assigned. To give additional weight to their high office, the Emperor appointed them for life, instead of for a term of five years which had hitherto been the rule, and nominated men of senatorial or equestrian rank according to the relative importance of the roads committed to their care. According to Isidore of Seville, the kind of roads supposed to have been borrowed from the Carthaginians were called vice munitce, which were paved with rectangular blocks of any hard local stone, or with polygonal blocks of lava.^ From Ulpian^ we learn that there were several different kinds of roads known to the Romans. There was the via terrena, which had an ordinary surface of levelled earth. A second kind was the via glareata, having a gravelled surface, referred to by Livy,' who speaks of the censors of his time as being the first to contract for paving the streets of Rome with flint stones, for laying gravel on the roads outside the city, and for forming raised footpaths at the sides. A third kind was the via munita, which in course of time became identical in meaning with viapublica.^ ' Orig. XV. l6, 6. Primum Pani dicuntur lapidibus vias stravisse ; postea Romani per omnem pane urbem disposuerunt, propter rectitudinem itinerum et ne plebs essetoHosa. ^ Ulpian, Dig. 43, ii, 2. » Livy, xli. c. 27. * Smith's ZJjVA of Gr. and Rom. Antiq. art. 'Vise.' According to Signor Lan- ciani, munita means levelled, straightened, and macadamised. Vide Livy, ix. 29. Africa under Trajan 67 During the Empire the office of superintendent of public roads was of such honour and distinction that it became the custom to confer it upon those who had been consuls. Julius Caesar is mentioned by Plutarch as curator or superintendent of the Appian Way, and we learn that he spent his own money on its maintenance. Augustus also, we are told, personally accepted the office of curator in the vicinity of Rome. The roads ex- tended to a considerable distance from the capital, the length of the Appian Way being computed at 350 miles. A recent traveller, speaking of this great highway, remarks that though it is much broken in several places and travelling over it very uncomfortable, it is wonderfully well preserved. So hard indeed is the material that it may be said to be polished rather than worn, and in some parts the entire width appears to have been paved with single slabs.' Siculus Flaccus, who lived in the reign of Trajan, designates the public roads as vice puhlicce regalesque, under the charge of curatores, and says that they were repaired at the public expense by redemptores (contractors), a fixed contribution being levied from adjacent landowners. The use of the word corresponding to regales may be traced to Herodotus, who speaks of the oZol ^aa-lXsioi of the Persians, probably the first organisers of the system of public highways. In the book of Numbers we read of the children of Israel asking permission to 'go by the king's highway,' ^ and in our own time we constantly use such expressions as the king's highway and the royal road. There is sufficient evidence from the Geography of Ptolemy, who lived in the reigns of Hadrian and Antonine, and from the Itinerary of Antoninus, which was written in the form handed down to us prior to the time of Constantine, that extraordinary attention was bestowed on the service of the public roads in the provinces of the Empire, as well as in Italy. Among the inscriptions found in Africa relating to curatores viarum, the following dedication on a pedestal at Tiddis* (Kheneg) of the time of Hadrian possesses some interest. It gives an idea of the high distinction attached in those days to a seat on a highway board, quatuorviro viarum curandarum. ' Smith's Diet, of Gr. and Rom. Antiq. art. 'Viae.' * Numbers xx. 17. ' l.R.A. No. 2322. Vidi Annuaire de Constantine, art. by General Creuilly, 1853, p. 87. F 2 68 Roman Africa Q • LOLLIO • M ■ FIL QVIR • VRBICO ■ COS LEG • AVG • PROVING ■ GERM INFERIORIS • FETIALI • LEGATO IMP • HADRIANI ■ IN • EXPEDITION IVDAICA ■ QVA • DONATVS • EST HASTA_- PVRA • CORONA ■ AVREA • LEG LEG • X • GEMINAE • PRAET ■ CANDIDAT CAES • TRIB • PLEB -CANDIDAT • CAES • LEG PROCOS • ASIAE • Q VAES T • VRBIS • TRIB LATICLAVIO ■ LEG • XXII • PRIMIGENIAE nil • VIRO • VIARVM • CVRAND PATRONO D-D P - P Quinto Lollio, Marci filio, Quirina tribu, Urbico, consuli, legato AugusH provincicB Germania inferioris, fetiali, legato Imperatoris Hadriani in expeditione Judaica, qua donatus est hastapura, corona aurea, legato legionis decima Gemina, prcetori candidato Cmsaris, tribuno plebei candidato Cessans, legato proconsulis Asia, quastori Urbis, tribuno laticlavio legionis vicesimce secundce Primigenice, quatuorviro viarum curandarum, patrono. Decreto decurionum. Pecunia publica A long score of indebtedness to the Roman world tempts us to ignore our obligations in such small matters as the placing of milliary columns or milestones on our highways, and to forget that Caius Gracchus, 1 20 years before the Christian era, was the first to recognise their utility for civil as well as military purposes. The system which he adopted was afterwards brought to perfection by Augustus, and from his time no public road in the Empire was without them. The milliaria in general use were short columns, generally of marble, but sometimes of stone. The inscriptions upon them gave the distance from a capital or town expressed in paces, a thousand paces {inille passus) repre- senting a Roman mile, equivalent to 4,854 English feet. Some- times the initial letters M.P. were omitted. The inscription further gave the name of the constructor of the road, coupled with that of the emperor in whose honour it was dedicated. Africa under Trajan 69 As a central mark in Rome, Augustus set up a gilt bronze column in the Forum, called the Milliarium Aureum, near a flight of steps which led up to the Temple of Saturn.' On this column were inscribed the names and distances of the chief towns on the roads mentioned by Pliny as radiating through the thirty-seven gates of Rome.^ Outside the city walls the respective measurements were taken from the gates. It may be inferred that each city in the province had a similar milliarium., though not necessarily aureum. Ordinary milliaria abound in North Africa, and by many of them we obtain a clue to several lines of roads which would otherwise have been lost, the date of their construction, and a reliable means of correcting loosely written statements by ancient authors. Few milliary columns of the period of the Casars have been discovered, but those inscribed with the names of Trajan and his successors have been brought to light in nearly every part of the country occupied by the Romans. The port of Thabraca (Tabarca), which lies on the northern coast midway between Utica and Hippo Regius, and the road running direct south connecting the town with the main high- way from Carthage, received the attention of Trajan in the early part of his reign. Pliny speaks of Thabraca as a Roman city on the river Tusca, which forms the eastern boundary of Numidia, and quaintly adds that besides Numidian marble and wild beasts 'there is nothing worth noting.'* The port was evidently used for the shipment of wild animals to Ostia for the service of the amphitheatre in Rome, for the export of the rich products of the Medjerda plains, and for the transport of timber for building purposes, and possibly firewood. The Roman remains at Tabarca are scattered over a large area, but, from the absence of refinement in any architectural or deco- rative work yet discovered, the town may be regarded as having been purely commercial. The chief interest of the place in rtiodern times is centred in a rocky island about half a mile from the mainland, crowned by a citadel of picturesque aspect and considerable strength, constructed by Charles V. on the ' Middleton's Ancient Rome in 1885, p. 166. Otho and the Praetorian con- spirators who murdered Galba met ad Milliarium Aureum sub cede Satumi. (Plutarch, Galba, 24.) ^ Pliny, Hist. Nat. iii. 5. ' Ibid. v. 3. 70 Roman Africa completion of his expedition against Tunis in 1535. The edifice, with the walls of defence, has been partly built with the stones of old Thabraka, but no inscriptions relating to the occu- pation of the island by the Romans have yet been discovered. When Peysonnel visited the spot in 1724 the castle was occu- pied by Genoese troops, and the fortifications were armed with bronze guns bearing the arms of the Lomellini, a noble family of Genoa. He speaks of the island as strong and safe, and in a condition neither to fear the Turk nor the Arabs of Barbary. The old road into the interior, which followed for a considerable distance the banks of the ancient river Tusca, now known as the Oued-el-Kebir (the Great River) or the Oued-es-Zan (the River of Oak-trees), appears to have been reconstructed by Trajan. Close to the southern boundary at Fernana, about 32 miles from Tabarca, is a milliary column, and 12 miles further south, at the foot of the mountains, another is still existing. This region lying between the Mediterranean and the Medjerda plains, occupying an area of about 480 square miles, with a seaboard of less than 16 miles, has been known for a long period as the country of the Khomair (sing. Khomiri). Prior to the French occupation, and dating back many centuries, it was practically an unknown country, avoided by travellers on account of the lawlessness of its inhabitants, and generally marked as a blank on maps of Northern Africa. A tribute in money was paid annually to the emissaries of the Bey of Tunis representing the Sultan of Turkey, but this was invariably done with the payment in one hand and the pistol in the other.^ In fact, these uncivilised people refused to recognise the authority of the Bey on one side of their territory, or that of the Dey of Algiers on the other, preferring independence and a lawless life coupled with poverty and hardship to the doubtful ad- vantages of living under Turkish rule. The configuration of the country, and the capabilities of the soil to produce a suffi- ciency of food with the smallest amount of labour, were all ' This historic spot, known as Fernana, where tribute was paid, derives its name from a gigantic cork oak, the branches of which spread considerably over 100 feet. It is a conspicuous object in the landscape, as there is no other tree within many miles. The story goes that, if any soldier of the Bey had attempted to advance beyond the tree, the taxes would have been paid in powder and shot. r-'--^' J-; \ f#4 A t ■ \ J*' < Q o w Africa under Trajan 71 in their favour, and so they have lived on through countless generations in penury and rags, without one thought of striving for a higher life, or the slightest regard for the beauty of the country they called their own. No part of North Africa has been more favoured by nature than this little-known land of the Khomair. Hill and dale clothed with soft verdure succeed each other in pleasant variety ; mountain slopes rugged and picturesque ; forests of cork and olive ; an undergrowth of myrtle and juniper and wild rose ; a land thinly peopled, but a landscape to charm the eye of poet or painter,^ Faint traces of the Roman road are apparent in traversing the country, and remains of farm establishments give sufficient indications of a civilised condition in the days of the Empire. It is probable that this road of Trajan's followed the course of a road or track used in earlier times by the kings of Numidia, because it lay in a direct line between the coast and their ancient capital Bulla Regia, now known as Hammam Darradji. It is unfortunate that we have so little knowledge of this old-world metropolis which has a history without records, and ruined monuments without inscriptions. A few years ago a triumphal arch elaborately ornamented was a conspicuous feature on the rising ground. The Thermce, judging from their remains, were on a large scale and covered a considerable area of land. The theatre, the walls of which are still intact, built with large blocks of finely dressed stone, was beautifully situated on a spur of the mountain ; and as the ground at the present time is on a level with the top of the proscenium, some idea may be formed of the alteration of the surface since the final destruction and abandonment of Bulla Regia by the Arabs in the seventh century. The amphitheatre is only indicated by undulations of the surface, and the entire site of the city, nearly a mile long, is so choked with weeds and undergrowth that recognition of the different public buildings is difficult. The Byzantines in their turn contributed largely to the destruction of Roman edifices here as elsewhere, and, as usual, paid no respect to monumental buildings, whether Roman or Numidian, but used them as a kind of quarry for the erection of fortresses and walls of defence. In the centre of the city are the remains of a large Nymphceum, semicircular in plan, a favourite form ' ' Umbriferos ubi pandit Tabraca saltus.' (Juvenal, Sat. x. 194.) 72 Roman Africa with the Romans. From the appearance of the fragments this was a work of great beauty, and was ornamented with colon- nades, like other well-known examples in Italy and elsewhere. It is lamentable to add that an inexcusable concession of the stones in this district, for the purposes of the Tunisian railway completed some fifteen years ago, was followed by a destruction of numerous monuments, as well as of a number of inscribed stones which might have thrown some light on the early history of this royal city. According to M. Tissot,^ who made careful investigations of the site in recent years, Bulla Regia appears to have long preserved its Punico- Libyan character, and coins discovered here bearing the crescent and the disc indicate the worship of Baal joined to that of the great goddess of the Carthaginians, Tanith or Virgo Cselestis. The Numidian marble referred to by Pliny in his mention of Thabraka came from the quarries at Simittu (Chemtou), one day's journey west of Bulla Regia. Trajan's interest in the town and its beautiful products was marked by the erection of a colossal bridge ovpr the Medjerda, two arches of which and the remains of a quay are still standing. Two hundred feet distant are the ruins of a much older bridge, carrying us back to the time of the Numidian kings. An immense slab oi giallo- antico marble lying in an adjoining meadow bears an inscription relating to Trajan's monumental structures.^ The date of its erection is A.D. 112, when the Emperor was Consul for the sixth time, being the same year in which the stately column was raised in the Forum at Rome in honour of his Dacian victory. CAESAR DIVI VAE F NERVA AIANVS OPTIMVS G • GERM • DACIC PONT X TR^B POT • XVI IMP VI COS VI P • P TEM NOVVM A FVNDAMENTIS ERA MILITVM SVORVM • ET PECVNIA SVA ROVINCIAE AFRICAE FECIT ' C. Tissot, Le Bassin du Bagrada et la Vote Romaine de Carthage h Hippone par Bulla Regia. Paris, Imp. Nat. 1881. 2 C. Tissot, ibid. o H w X o H H H