m: »'$■ THE GIFT OF y-?^XLir^.^r^jlv^^ \WU.w...... 678-2 ...f\.axip.n.n • »w^^.« Cornell University Library BV4010 .D99 Christian minister and lis duties, by J olin 3 1924 029 353 970 The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://archive.org/details/cu31924029353970 4--"- i THE CHRISTIAN MINISTER AND HIS DUTIES ,«^<1I^ » ^i? >*-*Jf THE CHRISTIAN MINISTER AND HIS DUTIES BY .1 J. OSWALD DYKES, M.A., D.D. PRINCIPAL EMERITUS OF WESTMINSTER COLLEGE, CAMBRIDGE Edinburgh: T. & T. CLARK, 38 George Street 1908 r%^4-^ ,1.1 ;r, llli'.* \\\;:'n '■vil'.ii 6^8-7 Printed by Morrison & Gibb Limited FOR T. & T. CLARK, EDINBURGH LONDON: SIMPKIN, MARSHALL, HAMILTON, KENT, AND CO. LIMITED NEW YORK : CHARLES SCRIBNER'S SONS ^ PREFACE If a ministry of close on fifty years, during about a score of which it was my duty to lecture to Students of Divinity on their future work, do not plead an apology for the following pages, I fear I have no better one to offer. They would never have seen the light but for the repeatedly expressed desire of former students. In their preparation for the press I have aimed less at the formal completeness of a scientific treatise than at practical utility. I have tried to keep in mind the actual requirements of candidates for sacred office and of the junior clergy, not in one Church only, but in every evangelical communion. For the duties of a Christian Minister are in all Protestant communities fundamentally the same. Even in details they approximate more closely than our superficial divisions might lead us, on a casual survey, to perceive. But, while keeping present-day con- ditions steadily in view, I have not forgotten that, like every other theological discipline. Practical Theology must draw its guiding principles from the New Testament, and derive illustration from its own past in the Christian centuries. Without curtailing the two departments of a Minister's ojBfice which, under the names of Homiletics and Pastoral Theology, occupy the bulk of most text-books on the vi PREFACE subject, it will be found that more space than is usual in English works of this class has been given to the conduct of public worship — a duty which in every non-liturgical service lays such a heavy demand on the officiating Minister. The function of a Church Kuler has been omitted, because the Minister's share in the administration of ecclesiastical affairs and in the exercise of discipline varies so much with each separate Church organisation that no treatment of it could find general application. I owe cordial thanks to the Eev. Dr. John Kelman of Edinburgh for kindly revising these sheets in MS., and favouring me with suggestions of which I have frequently availed myself. CONTENTS PART I THE MODERN MINISTER CHAP. I. Official and Non-official Ministey II. The Ministry not a Priesthood III. Lessons from the New Testament IV. The Call to the Ministry ' V. The Minister's Devotional Life VI. Ministerial Character . VII. Ministerial Manners VIII. Home Life .... IX. Citizenship * . . . PAGE 1 10 20 30 43 51 57 66 77 PART II THE MINISTER AS LEADER IN WORSHIP X. Theory of Christian Worship . XI. Worship in the Church of the First Century XII. Sixteenth Century Reforms in Worship XIII. Order of Weekly Worship XIV. S acramenta l Services .... XV. Week-day Services .... 88 101 114 126 149 171 PART III THE MINISTER AS PREACHER XVI. What is Preaching? XVII. Pastoral Preaching : I. vu 180 188 vni CONTENTS CHAP. XVIII. Pastoral Preaching : II. XIX. Evangelistic Preaching . XX. Preparing to Preach : Choice of a Text XXI. Preparing to Preach : Plan of the Sermon XXII. Diction and Delivery . XXIII. Preparation of the Preacher . PAGE 204 216 228 239 264 282 PART IV THE MINISTER AS PASTOR XXIV. The Care of Souls XXV. Household Visitation XXVI. The Sick and the Bereaved XXVII. The Care of the Young XXVIII. Cases of Spiritual Trouble 300 310 321 333 351 INDEX 367 PART I THE MODERN MINISTER CHAPTEE I OFFICIAL AND NON-OFFICIAL MINISTRY The official familiar to the modern Churches under a variety of titles, as pastor, priest, clergyman, parson or minister, is a functionary who had no exact equivalent in the age of the apostles. It is true that we know little of the arrange- ments which obtained in many of those groups of converts, Hebrew or Greek, which were gathered by the labours of apostolic missionaries in the first century. We are de- pendent on casual allusions in the few extant letters addressed to them by theii' founders, or in the Book of Acts. But the ordained officers mentioned there differed in a number of important respects from the modern ministry. Leaving out of view those younger officers called " deacons," our knowledge of whose functions is too slight to found conclusions upon, the closest analogue to a modern minister must be found in the presbyter-bishop — a class of officials selected from the membership of a church or congregation for their age, gravity or experience, to whom was entrusted a general superintendence of the religious welfare of the brotherhood. The earliest men- tion of them is in the Mother Church of Jerusalem, under the Jewish title of Presbyters or " Elders." ^ The only 1 Acts 1130. 2 THE MODERN MINISTER Churches on Greek soil in which we learn from our sources that under the missionary ministry of St. Paul presbyter- bishops were ordained, are the newly-founded communities in Southern Galatia {circa 49), the Church at Ephesus (c. 58), and that of Philippi (c. 62 or 63). At a later date Titus was instructed to appoint them also in Crete.^ But they are not named in Paul's letters to Thessalonica, or to Corinth, or to Kome ; that is, not in any letter of his of earlier date than his Eoman imprisonment. Are we to infer, as Baur did in the case of Corinth particularly, that no such office then existed in those great Churches ? Such an inference e silentio would be a precarious one. Never- theless, it is a mistake to assume, as disputants on Church polity used commonly to do, that there was a uniform organisation in the apostolic Churches, which prevailed over the whole field as well as over the whole half century covered by our New Testament documents. It seems pretty clear, on the contrary, not only that a certain development in Church organisation must be recognised within the apostolic period, but also that different arrange- ments obtained simultaneously in different places. But even if presbyter-bishops were everywhere appointed, they were far from monopolising every form of congregational ministry as they practically do to-day. The earlier letters of St. Paul speak much of freewill services rendered by groups of exceptionally gifted members, who were not set apart as permanent officials. They are found not only in Churches where, as in Corinth, we hear nothing of presbyters, but also, as at Ephesus, where we are sure presbyters existed. No fewer than nine forms of such " charismatic " ministration are named in a single passage of St. Paul's Pirst Letter to Corinth as exercised alongside each other, and exercised by different persons variously gifted.^ Four or five on the list must have ceased with the cessation of supernatural powers. Such as survive, with others as well, have now fallen, mainly, if not exclusively, into the hands 1 Acts 1423, 20", Phil, 11, 1 Tim. Z\ Tit. l'. 2 1 Cor. 128-". OFFICIAL AND NON-OFFICIAL MINISTRY 3 of the regular ordained ministry. It may be that the modern minister is now the nearest representative of the primitive presbyter, otherwise called " bishop." He may even be the historical descendant, by unbroken succession, of that order. But his office covers at least a much wider range of duties. There is no evidence that either the conduct of public worship or the delivery of religious discourses formed at first any part of the official duty of a presbyter-bishop. Their function, wherever found, is described as one of oversight or superintendence : and they may very well have acted as a moderating force on the excesses of enthusiasm. For no great religion ever bursts, new and aggressive, upon the world, to win rapid success, that is not inspired with enthusiastic ardour for the faith it preaches. And in the primitive fervour of Christianity, it was by apostles and prophets that the faith was preached. In the first age, as in every age, conspicuous gifts of im- pressive speech secured for their possessors an influence both wide and deep ; and in the first age, more than in subsequent ones, all might speak, provided only they possessed the gift. The arrangement, one sees, was of a temporary character, suited to the formative age of the new society. Fairly soon it passed away ; but it is no longer possible to trace the steps by which the services of these gifted volunteers were superseded, until every function needed for the life of a Christian community came to be lodged in official hands. We probably detect some of the earliest signs of change in the Pastoral Epistles ; for example, in the special " honour " bestowed on elders who were also competent to " labour in the Word and in teaching," ^ and generally in the increased importance attached by these late documents to ordained officers. Whatever be their date, a stage had by that time been reached when the Church could trust less than at first to impromptu en- thusiasm, and when the need for a "form of sound 1 1 Tim. 517. 4 THE MODERN MINISTER doctrine" was more keenly felt. It is possible, I think, that in places where the Greek element preponderated and the Greek democratic spirit was strong, some Churches may- have retained for a longer period than elsewhere a pre- ference for free and spontaneous services by private members. And the BidoLche is evidence that in a very different part of Christendom, among obscure country churches of Hebrew origin where presbyters were ordinarily in charge, itinerant preachers, "prophets and apostles," still enjoyed exceptional privileges. At the same time, it shows, by precautions taken against the abuse of these high titles, that the palmy days of the " charismatic " ministry were over.^ The process of transition must have stretched over more than a single generation ; and the Montanist movement in the second century, while it meant much more, probably indicates that the primitive system died hard. It was part of the Montanist reaction against change to " reassert," in Hatch's words, " the place of spiritual gifts as contrasted with official rule." ^ The very failure of that reaction no doubt helped to consolidate the power of the official classes in the Church ; but probably a more effective cause was the rapid spread of sacramentarian and sacerdotal ideas. By investing the clergy with the mysterious prerogatives of a priestly caste, and making them indispensable channels of saving grace, this secured to them a monopoly of spiritual functions and fastened on the Ancient Catholic Church the yoke of clerical ascendency. But although, in some later periods of her history, the ministration of non-official members of the Church almost ceased, they have been again and again in various forms revived. The Koman Church itself has known how to utilise such freewill services outside her regular priesthood, by enrolling many groups of devoted servants of Christ, both male and female, who, to the vast enrichment of ^ Didadie, c. xi. ; cf. Hermas, Sim. ix. 25 ; Mand. xi. '^ Organisation of Early Christian Churches^ 1881, p. 120. OFFICIAL AND NON-OFFICIAL MINISTRY 5 her life, have given themselves to specific forms of Christian work, philanthropic or educational. The recent growth in Protestant lands of similar " charismatic " agencies has begun to force upon our own Churches a similar problem. The days are past when every detail in the ecclesiastical life of a parish, every part of the Church's ministry to the poor or the irrehgious, could be left to the ordained clergy. Lay readers, evangelists, Bible-women, and city missionaries are doing the Church's work, though as yet they receive for the most part no ordination nor possess any defined standing among her ministers. Already the visitation of the sick poor by Christian women has been formally recognised in sister- hoods of Deaconesses ; the Church Army, Hke the Salva- tion Army, marks an effort to organise aggressive home-mission operations ; and it may not be very long before the vast array of Sunday-school teachers in England and America will claim, or, if they do not claim, will receive, a quasi-official status. In fact, the present tendency of Church life runs towards the multipHcation of what are called " lay agencies." Should these be kept, as it is desirable to keep them, in close association with the Church, the result must be to make the " Minister " more and more, what he already is in many places, the organising and inspiring Head of a staff of active, though unpaid and unofficial, workers for the Kingdom of God. In the meantime, the ordained Ministry has long ago annexed, and seems likely long to retain, as its exclusive sphere, certain other essential departments of Church work, especially in connection with pubhc worship, which were originally distributed amongst private members gifted for their discharge. Nor is this widening of his official duties the only thing which distinguishes a modern minister of religion from any officer known to the apostolic Churches. The primitive "presbyter" was selected in mature life from the ranks of the local congregation over whose interests 6 THE MODERN MINISTER he was appointed to watch. He received no special training to fit him for so responsible a post; nor did his office in all likelihood entail the abandonment of his ordinary secular avocation. In these respects he closely resembled a Presbyterian "elder" of the present day, or the "deacon" in a Congregational church. It is very different with the modern "minister/' In nearly every communion, certainly in the older and the national Churches, he has devoted himself, usually in early manhood, to the service of the larger body, of which the local con- gregation where his work lies forms only a small part. He has been, as a rule, required to prepare himself for his life-work by a long, expensive, and scholarly education. In most cases he is ineligible for the care of a parish or of a congregation until the entire Church which he aspires to serve has^ satisfied itself of his quahfications by repeated examination of his gifts or attainments, spiritual and intellectual, and has put upon him its own imprimatur. None of these things could have been said of any official mentioned in the New Testament. Practically, therefore, our present-day ministry, Protestant and Catholic alike, represent a type to which the apostolic Church offered no very close parallel. It is, of course, a perfectly fair question, on which opinions may reasonably differ, whether this concentra- tion of functions in the same official hands has not gone too far for the best interests of the Christian Brotherhood. Two modern forms of ecclesiastical life in this country have answered the question by reverting to primitive usage, leaving free room, especially in worship, for voluntary ministrations by private members. The Society of Friends bases its freedom in worship, as is well known, upon the worshipper's dependence on an immediate inspiration from the Holy Spirit, which is supposed to render every form of cultus or prearranged channel for the Spirit's action superfluous or worse. ^ This, however, ^ Cf. Barclay, Apology ^ x. and xi. OFFICIAL AND NON-OFFICIAL MINISTRY 7 does not exclude officialism in every shape. "Elders," whose duty it is to watch over the young and care for the poor, have long been in existence in the Society. And although no one is educated for the office of preacher or ordained to such a ministry, yet such members as have long proved their possession of gifts for edification may receive from their brethren some sort of recogniti6n or approval.^ It is one thing to widen in this way to the utmost the liberty of private members in the exercise of their gifts, or, in other words, to reduce the number of functions reserved for officials, at the risk even of exaggerating the fortuitous or incalculable element in the Holy Spirit's action to the neglect of His ordinary methods. It is a different thing to object on principle to the exist- ence of office-bearers in the Christian Society altogether. Where such an extreme position is taken up, as it is supposed to be by the " Brethren," ^ the defender of ecclesiastical office has two lines of defence open to him. The one is to show that from the nature of the case, specialisation of functions in the hands of a special class of Church members is necessary, if not for the preservation, at least for the order and effectiveness of the body. As a mere protest against certain types of hard and fast official- ism, repressing free activity in Church life, the reaction of " Plymouthism " in last century was intelligible and may have been useful. But all life tends to organise itself. Every community needs to perform certain common acts through organs set apart for such service. And the Christian Society, being subject to the same conditions as ^ "We do believe and afl&rm that some are more particularly called to the work of the ministry, and therefore are fitted of the Lord for that purpose ; whose work is more constantly and particularly to instruct, exhort, admonish, oversee, and watch over their brethren" {Apology, x. § 26). What Barclay chiefly objects to is the limitation of the ministry to such as have been expressly educated for it in languages and philosophy. ^ I am not sure that in some churches of the "Brethren," an informal ministry is not conceded, as among the "Friends," to certain qualified members. 8 THE MODERN MINISTER other societies, could not do otherwise. It may be going too far to say with Htiffell ^ that, without a ministry of the Word, Christian life would have expired within a couple of centuries. At least the unequal distribution of gifts constituted from the first what Nitzsch ^ calls a " natural or native clergy." And even if our Lord and His Apostles had launched the Church into existence quite amorphous or inorganic, as a loose aggregate of individuals, with none to lead and none to be led, it is quite certain that it would have early addressed itself to the task of self-organisation. But it is easy to show, in the next place, that it was not so launched into being. From its first day, it had its leaders in the Twelve. One of the earliest acts of the Mother Church taken on their initiative was the ordination of " the Seven " to serve tables : a special organ developed to do a special function. In the same Mother Church under the eye of the Twelve we soon read of " Elders." And the first missionary to the Gentiles on his first mission tour " appointed elders in every Church." If the question be put : Did Jesus institute a permanent office in His Church ? the answer must be : By immediate personal appointment — no ; for in that way what He instituted was the Apostolate, which was not permanent. But, through indirect utterance of His will — yes ; and that in various ways. First, by the bestowal of gifted servants fitted for office ; next, through the Apostles as His plenipotentiaries, when they ordained such persons to an office designed to be permanent ; and, lastly, by the results which have ever since sealed the institution. Hence St. Paul does not scruple to speak of the original office-bearers at Ephesus as given and appointed by the Lord Himself.^ If it be further asked : Has the modern office of the Ministry been in this sense instituted by Christ ? I conceive the answer must be : In its present form, not, in so far as the precise shape it has assumed in different communities is due to the ^ Wesen und Beruf des Evang. GeistUchen (4 Aufl. 1843). 2 PraUische Theologie, 1847-1867, i. 16. ^ gph. 4", Acts 202«. OFFICIAL AND NON-OFFICIAL MINISTRY 9 exigencies of modern need met by the discretion of the Church herself. But, in respect of its essence — yes; inasmuch as the place and functions of the Ministry among us do not essentially differ, though they differ in details, from those of the overseers whom Paul in Christ's name set up at Iconium, Ephesus, Philippi and Crete. Fresh duties have been imposed, particularly the conduct of congregational worship. Special care has been taken to secure a steady supply of qualified men. They are become the agents of a larger body than the Christians of a single city. And they receive a salary, that they may devote themselves entirely to their work. But none of these changes, though important, touches the essence of office. That remains what it began by being amongst the earliest converts : — the oversight of the flock of God. They tend, they feed, they watch for, they rule, the charge allotted to them, and are examples to their brethren, exactly like those faithful men of the first Christian generation to whom St. Paul wrote, or St. Peter, or the author of the Epistle to the Hebrews.^ 1 Cf. 1 Pet. 52- 3, Acts 202«-3i, 1 Tim. 5", Heb. 13". CHAPTER II THE MINISTRY NOT A PRIESTHOOD Our conception of office in the Christian Church will be determined by the view we take of the nature of the Church itself; so that, as two very different theories of the Church obtain in Christendom, there have arisen two contrasted ways of regarding ecclesiastical officers. Those who accept the Catholic doctrine of the Church as an institution endowed by its Head with power to convey to men His saving grace through the administration of sacramental rites, necessarily regard the clergy, by whose hands alone those rites can be administered, as invested by Christ Himself with this ministry of mediation. On this theory, the ministry becomes a mediating priesthood, occupying, as the indispensable channels of salvation, an intermediate place between the laity and their Lord. And the act which ordains to office, when legitimately performed, is supposed to convey this exclusive right and power to mediate grace, by an unbroken transmission of it from Christ Himself through His Apostles and their episcopal successors. Against this idea of a mediating priesthood, every Protestant communion, Lutheran and Reformed alike, is in vehement protest ; the best of the Anglican High Church- men as emphatically as any.^ In that sense, we are all agreed that there is but one unique and perfect Mediator ^ Cf. Moberly, Ministerial Priesthood; Gore, The Church and its Ministry ; Liddon, University Sermons (2nd Series) ; Different Conceptions of Priesthood and Sacrifice : Report of a GonfercncQ, edited by Sanday. lO THE MINISTRY NOT A PRIESTHOOD ii and High Priest, who, having by Himself purged our sins and passed through the heavens, presents for ever before the throne His one atoning sacrifice, and by His intercession procures for all His people the saving grace of the Holy Spirit. This leaves neither need nor room for any other to stand between the soul and God, or to open for any man the way to peace. For through His effectual mediation, we all enjoy the same free access into the Holy Presence, and for our persons and our offerings the same gracious acceptance. The conception of the Church to which this leads, and which we believe to be both scriptural and primitive, is that of a priestly Brotherhood of spiritual equals. It makes every believer a priest, not in the Levitical sense of one who has an exclusive privilege of access to God and there- fore can offer sacrifices on behalf of others, but in the wider meaning of one who has for himself direct access as a worshipper to the Divine Presence. The united Church is at once a community of such priests and a priestly com- munity. But, of course, it is so solely in virtue of its union with Christ, brought near to God in Him, and privileged to share His access to the Holy Place. The emphasis, it is obvious, is laid by Protestantism no longer on the ministry, as distinguished from the laity, but on the entire membership of the Church. As a visible society, the Church has been by the will of its Founder organised to be His instrument for a double purpose : for self-edification through the development of Christ-like character in its members, and for self -propagation through- out the world. To this whole Body there have been given for the attainment of both these ends, the Word of God and the sacramental means of grace. These are the specific means by which the Spirit of Christ operates age after age in the work of the Kingdom of God. It is the common belief of the Protestant Churches that Christ has likewise conferred upon His Church a permanent ministry to be her stated organ for the effective 12 THE MODERN MINISTER proclamation of His Word and the valid administration of His sacraments. But if certain functions, expressive of the common life of the Church and required for her common work, come in this way to be ordinarily restricted to such official members, that is merely for the sake of their more orderly, constant, and efficient discharge. The motive for office is that the ends of the Church's existence may be the better secured. The quaHfication for office is excep- tional ability to secure these ends, conferred by Christ upon certain chosen members. But essentially and fundamentally, the work remains that of the whole Society. For its prosecution the entire membership is jointly and severally responsible : each Christian being under law to Christ to exercise in His service and for His ends such gifts as he has received from the Divine Head. What we reach along this line as the Protestant theory of Church office is that ministers are representative organs of the Brotherhood, through whom its public and organised activities can be carried on. The fact that certain functions have been so strictly assigned to officers set apart for their more orderly and effective performance, that ordinarily they are never discharged by any private member, is to be explained simply on the principle that when any community engages in common acts, someone must act for it, in its name, and authorised by its mandate. This lays on him no doubt a special responsibiHty. It even confers on him a certain privilege. But it does not mean in every case, perhaps need not in any case, that all the other members in the body are excluded from exercising in more private and occasional ways services of a similar character for which they too are qualified by their gifts. For example : we have seen that a general oversight of the flock resident in a given locality was very early entrusted, at least in some cases, to local officers set apart for the purpose under the title of " seniors," or " overseers " ; but it still remained the right and even the duty of a private Christian to watch over the religious well-being of THE MINISTRY NOT A PRIESTHOOD 13 his brother, and, upon occasion, to counsel, or to admonish, him.^ In the same way, the modern restriction of preach- ing in congregational worship to men trained and appointed to that office, by no means implies, either that other Christian men are not also taught of God by the " anointing from the Holy One " ; or that they have not liberty, if qualified, to proclaim at fit seasons the way of salvation ; or that room and opportunity ought not to be made for what is termed " lay -preaching," so that much ampler use may be made than at present of all the ability which God giveth. Of all Church acts, the administration of a sacra- ment is that which for obvious reasons has most need to be, and has been, limited to authorised persons. Yet so far does the inherent right of private members extend, to fulfil in case of urgency the most jealously guarded offices of religion, and so widely has it been by implication recognised, that a right to baptize in articulo mortis, and where no priest is available, is conceded by the most ritualistic of all Churches not only to laymen, but even to women. Were it conceiv- able that at any time the succession of duly ordained ministers could be wholly interrupted and fail, it follows from the Eeformed doctrine of the Church that the duty of providing for the discharge of every indispensable function of Church life would devolve on the united membership. The Church lives on, officers or none. The King's work must be done ; and men gifted by Him for the doing of it can never fail. At first sight it might appear as if the change at the Eeformation from Catholic priests to Protestant pastors had been for the Ministry a serious descent in influence or in dignity. In proportion as the laity recovered spiritual independence and rehgious privilege, in that proportion did the clergy seem to suffer loss of position. They lost their sacrosanct character. They ceased to be indispensable to the very being of the Church. They no longer occupied an elevation above the flock and nearer God. They came 1 Cf. 1 Thess. 5"- ", 2 Thess. S^^, Rom. 15", Col. S^^. 14 THE MODERN MINISTER to stand on the level of the people as their spiritual equals. And their office exhausted itself in ministering to the people's wants. I question, however, if, as a matter of history, the Protestant ministry has suffered either in usefulness or in esteem. For one thing, it still retains in the belief of the faithful the weight which attaches to a Divine sanction. Christ's original gift of ministers to His Church is felt by us to cover the office of a present-day presbyter — not to say, the bishop in Episcopal communions — quite as truly at least as it has ever apphed to Eoman priests ; all the more truly in so far as they more closely reproduce the apostolic " elder " or " bishop." Not only so : there has not even occurred any material breach in the transmission of office from one generation to the next. Such an unbroken succession is hard to prove in detail, and does not possess in the eyes of most Protestants the consequence which High Churchmen assign to it. But at least it is a valuable witness to the continuity of the Church's life. It serves for all of us as a precious link with the apostolic age ; and it transmits to each new generation of ministers the inheritance of a long and honourable ancestry. At the Eeformation no sudden or widespread hiatus occurred. There was on the whole a transmission of office. Many of the first presbyters and bishops in the Eeformed Churches had been in orders before the change. They took part in the ordination of their successors. And whatever be the value of transmission of orders, continuity has ever since been maintained with as much security in Presbyterian as in Episcopal communions. But what gave to the post-Reformation ministry its real power and dignity was this, that it was a ministry of the Word of God. It has been usual to say that under the new era the pulpit took the central place previously assigned to the altar. No doubt, preaching did become the chief method employed by the Eeformed for bringing the Word of God to bear on the consciences and hearts of THE MINISTRY NOT A PRIESTHOOD 15 men. But, in truth, every part of the ministerial calling, not the pulpit alone, was regarded as an application of the Word of God, and as deriving from that Gospel Word its value and its efficacy. As a pastor of souls, the minister's instrument was still the same. If he catechised, the religious instruction of the young was instruction in revealed truth. Even the sacraments held an ancillary position as signs to set forth, and seals to confirm to faith, the Gospel Word of promise. It is this prominence assigned to the Word of God, spoken as well as written, as the one great instrument given to the Church for the begetting and for the training of Christian life in the soul, which enables us to appreciate the position ever since accorded to Ministers in the Churches of the Keformation. This, and this alone, accounts for the note of authority which has characterised their utterances. As authorised exponents and proclaimers of the Divine Word, they have been clothed with some- thing of its own authority. Not with the authority of the Church merely, as holding a mandate from it, but with the authority of God whose Word is on their lips. In Calvinistic Churches, the usual title of their officers has been neither pastor nor priest, but " Minister of the Word." And their traditional arrangements for ministerial education have been modelled on the same conception of office. A careful training in the original languages of Holy Scripture and in the theology of the Confessions, is designed to fit the future minister before everything else for the exposition, both in the pulpit and out of it, of the Bible and of the truths which it is believed to contain. The very omissions to be noted in the usual divinity curriculum of these Churches find the same explanation. For instance : that the minister is to be a pastor of souls has been constantly recognised ; yet it has not been customary to subject him to much separate training for that portion of his task. Still less has it been deemed necessary to familiarise him in his student days with questions of Christian ethics, or i6 THE MODERN MINISTER with cases of conscience, as in a Eoman seminary for priests. Still more noticeable is the neglect of any proper preparation of future ministers for the conduct of divine service. In Churches of the Protestant faith where forms of prayer are prescribed, some previous instruction in the use of the prayer-book is usual, although here it might more easily be dispensed with. But where everything is left, as in Congregational or modern Presbyterian worship, to the minister as sole leader, his training for this high function has been notoriously and unaccountably neglected. Nor has even catechetics, or the art of teaching the young, entered into the education of a Presbyterian minister as it does into that of a Lutheran Pfarrer; in spite of the fact that the Keformed have never been behind their Lutheran brethren in providing catechisms as aids for the instruction of their children. It may be that too much attention has not been devoted by the Eeformed Churches to theology and the sacred languages, but at least it has been a too exclusive attention ; and I can only account for the omission of other subjects by supposing that one who fully knew and could rightly teach the Word of God was presumed to be sufficiently equipped by that alone for an office, all whose varied functions centred in the interpreta- tion and enforcement of that Word. The legitimate authority with which ministers have been accustomed to speak as interpreters of the sacred text and stewards of Divine mysteries was for a long time, and to some extent still is, strengthened by the wide interval which for generations elevated the scholarly and expert minister above his untrained flock. Sometimes, it must be confessed, ministerial authority has been claimed, and has been conceded, too much on such personal grounds. It has rested more than is meet either on the minister's scholarship as a learned student whose dicta the illiterate are not qualified to question, or on his piety as one exceptionally taught of God. Hence it has not always been sufficiently remembered, either by the pastoral THE MINISTRY NOT A PRIESTHOOD 17 preacher or by his congregation, that however superior his gifts for edifying address may be, he is here also an organ and representative of the Christian society, bearing its testimony, as well as his own, to the common Christian faith, as that which is taught by the anointing Spirit to the humblest believer. For the better instruction of the people, to increase their knowledge of Scripture, to correct mistakes and clarify their conceptions of the Gospel, and to enforce the admitted duties of their Christian profession — for such ends has he been raised above his hearers in sacred learning. But that personal experience of the Gospel which alone can make his word living and powerful, is their experience as well ; and the testimony which he bears to Christ is the united testimony of the witnessing Church in which dwells the Spirit of illumination. If I mistake not, it is not in the sermon only, but likewise in other parts of Divine service where their repre- sentative character is more evident, that some ministers are apt to overlook it. When the collective Church assembles in one place to draw near to God, each wor- shipper makes approach for himself and has his own spiritual offering to present. Only a leader is required, a spokesman to voice the common acts of all. This is the minister, who is thereby made a representative, to whose words they all make response, if not audibly, yet, surely, in their hearts. It is at this point that the question arises whether the leader in worship ought not to be, or at least may not legitimately be, described as a priest — not a mediating, but a representative, priest. For, of course, the universal priesthood of all believers as one with Christ, in the New Testament sense of the word, is to be fully recognised. Their acts of common worship are the " spiritual sacrifices " of what St. Peter calls a Updrev/jLa dytov, a ^aaikeiov Updrevfia.^ " The sacrifices of God are a broken spirit," and this each penitent brings with him. The whole 1 1 Pet. 24-10. i8 THE MODERN MINISTER congregation join to " offer up a sacrifice of praise to G-od continually, that is, the fruit of lips which make con- fession to His name." ^ Nor is it in the eucharist alone, but throughout the service, that they "present their bodies — themselves — a living sacrifice, holy and acceptable to God." 2 But I do not think all this requires us to term the leader a priest in any exceptional sense. For the sacrificial character inherent in the worship of Christian men pertains no more to the minister than to any other worshipper. He is a priest, but not in virtue of his ministry. When Anglican Churchmen, if Evangelicals, excuse, or, if High Churchmen, warmly applaud, the use in the rubrics of the Prayer Book of both terms as alternatives — " Minister " and " Priest " — they do it on the ground that he who represents and acts for a priestly community in its priestly acts may be styled in a certain eminent sense a priest. As an apology this may be allowed to pass, but 1 cannot join in the applause. Canon Moberly's definition : " ministerial organs of the Church's priesthood,"^ we may accept without accepting his con- clusions. When regard is had to the history of the word " priest," and to its employment over the greater part of Christendom, the risk of confusion between the two senses in which it is taken — ^its Levitical and Eoman use on the one hand, its New Testament connotation on the other — is so serious that those Churches of the Keforma- tion have surely done more wisely which have dropped the misleading title altogether. In this judgment, as Canon Moberly himself has told us,* some of the most judicious of Anglican divines have concurred. Eichard Hooker's words are well known : " To pass by the name, let them use what dialects they will, whether we call it a Priesthood, a Presbytership, or a Ministry, it skilleth not; although in truth the word Presbyter doth seem more fit, and 1 Heb. 13^^ 2 ^Q^ 121. ^ Report of Conference, ut supra, p. 142. ' Minist. Priesthood, p. 238-239, footnotes. THE MINISTRY NOT A PRIESTHOOD 19 in propriety of speech more agreeable than Priest with the drift of the whole Gospel of Jesus Christ." ^ And with this the more recent language of the late Bishop Light- foot is in accord : " It might have been better if the later Christian vocabulary had conformed to the silence of the Apostolic writers, so that the possibility of confusion would have been avoided." ^ ^ Eccl. Polity, Bk. v. Ixxviii. 3. ^ Diss, on the Apostolic Age, p. 235. CHAPTEE III LESSONS FROM THE NEW TESTAMENT The fundamental ideas which govern service in the kingdom of God, and even more the spirit in which it is to be rendered, remain substantially the same at all periods. The wise office-bearer of to-day will therefore draw largely for direction, warning, or stimulus upon the experience of the past. Biographies of eminent servants of Christ in every age may serve as models ; but in especial the records preserved in Sacred Scripture were written for his admonition. The example even of Old Testament prophets, in spite of obvious differences, can be made in many ways instructive. Their surrender to a divine call, their public spirit, their watchman-like vigilance, their courage, their loyalty to the truth as they received it from God — have all been put to use by in- genious authors for the profit of the Christian minister. But naturally the New Testament is richer both in lessons and in examples apposite to his case. From the charge which Jesus gave to the first messengers whom He sent out into the villages of Galilee, down to St. PauFs directions for the choice of elders at Ephesus or Crete, its pages abound in material which has been worked out by a host of writers on this subject, but which the conscientious minister can best study for himself in its original setting. Supreme over all is, of course, the ministry of our blessed Lord Himself, who, both as a religious teacher and as the Chief Shepherd and Bishop of souls, set once for all the pattern which His servants 20 LESSONS FROM THE NEW TESTAMENT 21 have to copy till the end of time. Next to this in value, though longo intervallo, must be put the autobiographic passages in the letters of His foremost follower, St. Paul. From these sources mainly, but indeed from the whole New Testament, endless guidance as well as inspiration comes to the minister who knows how to use it.^ That the present-day minister, by whatever title he is known, is virtually the only acting official in many of our Churches, and in all of them the one most in evidence, who unites in his single person almost every form of official activity, is the fact which justifies us in transferring to his work, under one or other of its departments,- nearly every significant title or picturesque metaphor applied by sacred writers to Christian ministers of their own generation.^ He combines the duties of an ambassador on Christ's behalf, of a steward over the house of God, of a bishop and shepherd of the flock, of a presiding elder and ruler, of a leader to animate, and of a pattern to be imitated. In this collection of expressive terms, the foremost thought (as might be expected) is responsibility for the oversight of souls ; although with that is blent, so that the two can hardly be kept apart, the further task of religious instruction. The idea of oversight comes out ^ On the lessons to be learned from the example and directions both of our Lord and of His apostles, the student may consult Beck's Pastoral Theology of the N. T. (T. & T. Clark, 1885). On our Lord as an example, see Blaikie, Public Ministry and Pastoral Methods of our Lord (Lond. 1883) ; and cf. Bruce's Training of the Twelve, and Latham's Pastor Pastorum. Of St. Paul as a model, an old book is The Portrait of St. Paul a true Model for Christians and Pastors (1806), translated from a French MS. of Fletcher of Madingley. The more recent work of Canon Newbolt, Speculum Sacerdotum (1894), is based on 2 Cor. 6*-i«. Dr. Stalker's Yale Lectures for 1891, The Preacher and his Models, draw lessons from Hebrew prophets and (in the last four lectures) from St. Paul. See also Fairbairn on The Pastoral Epistles (1874); Stirm, "Die Pastoral-theologischen Winke der Pastoral- briefe," in Jahrb. /. deut. Theol. B. 17 ; and Chadwick, The Pastoral Teaching of St. Paul {Ijondi. 1907). 2 This was done long ago by Gilbert Burnet, bishop of Sarum, in his Dis- course of the Pastoral Care ; whom Vinet follows in his Th^ologie Pastorale. 22 THE MODERN MINISTER best perhaps in the Greek iiriaKOTro^;, an officer whose vigilance cannot be accused of meddlesomeness, because it has been laid upon him to watch over, superintend, and act for the community. The same idea is suggested by the historical associations of the Jewish title " Presbyter " or " Elder " ; but with this added suggestion, that the authority of the official ought to be sustained by such natural influence or power to lead as comes from gravity, experience, and the wisdom of years. Of wider compass is that lovely metaphor of Shepherd or "Pastor"; for it embraces also instruction, or the nurture of old and young on the pasture of the Word. But its primary sense is still surveillance or tendance of the flock, recovery of the strayed, defence in danger ; before all else, personal and self-sacrificing devotion to its safety, with a peculiar tender flavour of belonging each to the other — flock to shepherd, and shepherd to flock. No other word sends us so straight to Jesus as the model of our office, or so dignifies our relation to His people by associat- ing it with His own, or is steeped in more touching and poetic associations. We are the under-shepherds of the one great and good Chief Shepherd.^ Next to shepherd comes Steward. Kooted in Jesus' own use of the word in this connection, it finds illustration both from St. Paul and St. Peter.^ Like shepherd, it too carries the same idea of responsible oversight ; but its special reference is probably to the provision of the house- hold of God with supplies of divine truth out of the storehouse of the Word. Eesponsibility for what is taught in God's house ; for its abundance, variety, suitableness, and purity : — this is what the modern minister of the Word has to be for ever learning from this image. ^ The full compass of this image is to be studied in Ps. 23 and the great chapter in Ezek. 34 : next in our Lord's own exposition of it in John 10 ; then in the restoration of St. Peter to office, John 21, which is illustrated finally by Peter's own pathetic reference to the subject, 1 Pet. 5^*^. 2 See Luke 12^1-^8^ 1 Cor. 4i-5, 1 Pet. 410. LESSONS FROM THE NEW TESTAMENT 23 It is less in his relation to those within the Church than to the world without that a minister, but especially an evangelist or missionary, inherits St. Paul's bold metaphor for him'self and his brother missionaries : " Herald " or Ambassador of Peace, bearing abroad to men the divine Word of reconciliation.^ But however much the pastoral side of one's office may under modern con- ditions preponderate in the field allotted to many of the clergy, there is no minister of Christ who will not find manifold occasion, as well as opportunity, to become a preacher of God's peace to the conscience ill at ease, or a herald of His grace to sinners yet unreconciled to God. Each of these titles brings a contribution of its own towards a complete conception of ministerial work. When the variety no less than the difficulty of all these solemn duties is suffered to make its due impression on the mind, no one, I should think, can escape the feeling that too much has surely been laid by our modern system on the shoulders of one man. Where ecclesiastical arrangements permit of a division of functions, one is inclined to say, it must be easier to find agents gifted, one for this, and another for that department. Nor is there anything in Scripture to forbid such distribution of the parts of ministerial duty. That in our ordinary congregations and parishes, where a single servant of Christ carries the whole load, things are not worse than they are, may be an indication that after all the various functions of the office stand closer to one another than is at first sight apparent. Between one department of his work and another, however dissimilar on the surface, there may be found in practice such an inward unity or affinity that the same gifts of mind and heart — the same training by observation and experience — which qualify a man for one part of his office, go far at least to qualify him also for the rest. ^ Only the verbal form irpea^e^xM is found (2 Cor. ^'^ and Eph. G^"). But cf. the closely allied Kripv^ in 1 Tim. 2^ and 2 Tim. 1", which yields the very frequent verb so characteristic of the Gospel — Kripijcrffeiv. 24 THE MODERN MINISTER One thing at least does lend unity to the manifold duties of the ministerial office ; one supreme gift there is which is called for by all of them alike. It is the Christ- like spirit — the temper of lowly and loving service to the brotherhood — in which all ministry within Christ's kingdom ought to be discharged. The New Testament word which we render by " service " or " ministry " (hiaKovla), while it has yielded a title to the deacon as the humblest officer in the society, describes an attitude which is characteristic of them all from the lowest to the very highest. It is the attitude of the Lord Himself. " I am in the midst of you as he that serveth/' said Jesus.^ St. Paul in one place calls his Master a " minister (that is, servant) of the circumcision." ^ To the Apostolate the term is frequently applied.^ Indeed, every gifted member bestowed on His Church by Christ is given " unto the work of ministering." * What is to be noted about this New Testament use of the word is not that church officers are servants of Christ. That goes without saying : " Ye call Me Master, and Lord : and ye say well ; for so I am." ^ The Christian minister is one whose obedience is due to an unseen Lord, whose discharge of official duty must bear ceaseless reference to Christ's future judgment, and whose reward will lie in the King's ultimate verdict of approval.^ This primary and indefeasible relationship underlies and governs every other. In particular, it has a most im- portant bearing on the minister's relation to his brethren both as their commissioned representative and as their minister. Yet the exceptional feature about Christian office is not that it is service paid to a Master, — all service is that, — but that it is a serving of one's fellow-servants for the Master's sake. It is a fundamental law of the 1 Luke 2227. 2 lioijj 158^ 3 See Acts !"• ^^ 20^4 2P», Rom. ll^^ i Qor. 3°, 2 Cor. S^-a 6^ 1123. ^ Eph. 4'2. 5 John 13", cf. Matt. 23'0- « Cf. Matt. 24^6 2521, Luke l^^\ 1 Cor. ^'^•'^ LESSONS FROM THE NEW TESTAMENT 25 new kingdom, that whoever will serve Christ is set by Him to minister to Christ's brethren ; and to the officer in His household this law applies with peculiar force. " If any man would be first," said our Lord, "he shall be last of all, and minister of all."^ Nay, St. Paul does not scruple to accept for himself a much stronger word : " We preach not ourselves," he writes, " but Christ Jesus as Lord, and ourselves as your bond-servants (SouXou?) for Jesus' sake." 2 Such language, standing alone, might easily lend itself to an interpretation offensive to the instincts of the Christian brotherhood ; as if our ministry lay in a servile subjection to our fellow-Christians, or in the humouring and flattering of others. From this it is saved, partly by its voluntary character,^ but much more by that supreme responsibility to the common Master of us all, of which I have just spoken. That forbids obsequiousness to men. It frees the minister from any temptation to serve their mere pleasure, to be the slave of their whims, to live upon their favour, to covet their applause, or to cringe for their approval. " If I were still pleasing men, I should not be a servant of Christ." ^ This danger of men-pleasing is not less excluded by the ends which the ministry is designed to effect. The whole work of the Church on earth, and in particular of its officials, is not rightly apprehended until it is viewed as a co-operation with Christ for securing the results of His own mission into the world. Of that mission the design, as we well know, was primarily the salvation of individuals from sin, but ultimately the formation and perfecting upon earth of the kingdom — the reign — of God. To that aim was His personal ministry in life and death consecrated. Toward that aim He continues to work on 1 Mark 935. 2 2 Cor. 4^. ^Cf. 1 Cor. 91*: "Though I was free from all men, I brought myself under bondage to all, that I might gain the more." 4 Gal. 11". 26 THE MODERN MINISTER through the ages, using now as His chief earthly instru- ment the Church which is His body. For the outward and visible society into which He has been pleased to organise His followers has this for its chief use and raison d'etre, not to be, but to bring about, the realm of God among mankind. So long as we still need to pray, " Thy kingdom come ! " so long has the Church as an organised society its work to do. It has to perpetuate itself from one generation to another through the Christian training of its own immature members ; to edify itself by cultivating a devout and holy life ; to keep itself pure, and therefore effective for its purpose, through internal discipline; to bear witness, by worship and proclamation of the Gospel, to its Lord and His truth ; and to propagate itself in missionary evangeHsm to the ends of the earth. All these things ifc has to do as a fellow- worker with Christ ; and it does them largely through its official members. Strictly speaking, these things are not ends in themselves. They are means which the King, the Lord of the enterprise, employs toward His ultimate end, namely, the perfect realisation at last of the divine kingdom. Nevertheless, while subordinate in view of that supreme and final end, these activities of the Church's life are the immediate ends for which the ministry exists. As a practical guide, therefore, in the duties entrusted to him, no minister need set before himself any higher aim than the growth and perfecting of the Church as Christ's own living organ or instrument for the saving of the world ; nor dare he set himself any lower. The test which St. Paul applied to public worship at Corinth applies to every detail of a minister's work : " Let all things be done unto edifying." ^ If this canon be duly pondered to regulate the several functions of his office, it is obvious that it must deliver him from unbecoming subjection to the people's likes and dislikes. A ministry that seeks the very same result which Christ seeks cannot be an obsequious man-pleasing ^ 1 Cor. 1426. LESSONS FROM THE NEW TESTAMENT 27 ministry. It is not the pleasure of his fellow-members that the minister has to consult, but their profit ; not what they wish, but what will do them good. But the same canon, while it guards his legitimate independence, equally forbids him to prostitute his office into an instrument of self-assertion or self-aggrandisement. The spiritual interests of the Church (which in the case of a pastor must mean primarily those of his own con- gregation) are to be his first consideration, to which private interests must give way. The minister's comfort or ease, his personal feelings even, and reputation, are secondary when they come, as may sometimes happen, into competi- tion with the spiritual welfare of the people entrusted to his care. He exists, he labours, for their sake ; not they for his. Still less, of course, dare he permit himself to trade upon his sacred office as a means of worldly advantage, profit, or dignity. To treat the clerical calling simply as a profession of emolument and of some social importance, in which a cultured gentleman, by a decent attention to his duties, may pass creditably and comfortably through life, is an abuse common enough at certain periods, from which I think our Churches are to-day comparatively free. But temptations abound from which aspirants to the office or holders of it can never hope entirely to escape : tempta- tions to seek the " priest's office " for " a piece of bread," to be ambitious of preferment, to grow self-important over the influence which office confers or the respect in which it is held. Especially must danger always lurk for proud or wilful natures in those parts of his work which lift the minister in some respects above the ordinary Christian, as a teacher, for instance, a counsellor, or a ruler. Church- men in all ages have been prone to " magnify " their office in a sense of which St. Paul would not have approved ; forgetting what that stout assertor of his own position tells us, that even Apostolic authority was given him for no other use than to build up the Church.^ That this tempta- ^ 2 Cor. IS^o, 28 THE MODERN MINISTER tion to a lordly temper was to prove during the history of His Church one of its most inverterate and serious dangers was early foreseen by its divine Founder. So much, I think, we may with reverence infer from the exceptional pains He was at to guard against it, and the frequency with which He enforced the duty of humility.^ Not only did He again and again define with precision the moral contrast which His servants were to exhibit in this respect with secular rulers, He pointedly proposed Himself as their typical example of humility in service. Two classical passages in the Gospels deserve here especial attention. The one is that curious incident when the mother of a pair of brothers solicited on their behalf the two most favoured seats in Messiah's future kingdom.^ Of this opportunity everyone remembers how Jesus took advantage to warn against the ambition and lust of pre-eminence which inspire the intrigues of earthly courts, and to teach from His own example the novel lesson that a lowly temper, stooping with unselfish devotion to minister to others, is in His spiritual realm the one pathway to distinction. With this should be compared that strange pathetic scene of the feet-washing in the Fourth Gospel.^ Again was the same much-needed lesson enforced ; this time not by word only, but also by symbolic action. The sole relation betwixt brethren which is absolutely prohibited is lordship ; competing for priority, the one forbidden attitude. The services we are called on to render to one another — so the Master teaches — can never be too obscure or menial or distasteful for a humility and a love that have taken Him for their model. Nay, just in proportion as they are lowly, are they to be accounted precious or honourable. Certainly there is a " pride that apes humility." Imitations even of the feet- washing have been known to degenerate into ^ Besides passages cited below, cf. Matt. 23^-^2^ Mark S^'^', Matt. 18^-*, and Luke 9^-^\ 2 Matt. 2020-28, Mark lO^^-^ 3 131-17^ ^f^ j^^^^ 2224-27. LESSONS FROM THE NEW TESTAMENT 29 caricature. We escape such risks to the quality of our ministry just in the degree in which it is our Master's own aim that we pursue, and the spirit, not the form, of His great ministry that we copy. " Whosoever would be first among you shall be your bond-servant ; even as the Son of Man came not to be ministered unto, but to minister, and to give His life a ransom for many." CHAPTEK IV THE CALL TO THE MINISTRY Like the priesthood of which the writer to the Hebrews speaks, the holy ministry is an honour which no man taketh to himself, but when he is called of God.^ Yet this is not a distinction marking it off sharply from ordinary secular avocations. It is only the highest instance of a general rule. When St. Paul counselled his converts to abide each man in the calling wherein he had been called to be a Christian, he taught by implication the important truth that every man's position in society — even a slave's — was that appointed for him by Divine Providence.^ In the humbler pursuits of life, where little turns on the selection of a trade or craft, small causes commonly serve to fix a youth's choice. A fortuitous circumstance, a slight fancy, the calling of his father or his mere pleasure, a hopeful opening at the right moment, may be enough to determine one's whole career. In proportion as the services which a man is to render to society are more distinguished, or require an exceptional combination of gifts, do we find him marked out for his vocation by a more decided natural fitness, or by strong predilection or some imusual train of events. Artistic or literary genius, for example, indicates to a few the line of life which is to prove their path to fame. An irresistible hunger for adventure urges others into the career of a pioneer or discoverer. From such cases that of a minister does not essentially 1 Heb. 5^ 2 1 Cor. 7"-3*, 30 THE CALL TO THE MINISTRY 31 differ. Nor does his "calling" always disclose itself so strongly, or so early in life, as these. Only because it is a call to the most solemn and sacred form of service to God and man, where the consequences of mistake are more fatal and lasting than anywhere else, is it reasonable to take the utmost pains to discover the will of God, not only correctly, but with a sufficient degree of certainty. The ways in which a young Christian's thoughts are first directed towards the holy ministry, or his desire for it awakened, are manifold. Parents' wishes, or their early dedication of their son ; a studious and quiet disposition ; a marked crisis in religious experience ; or some facility in public address : such things may have given rise to the idea. No sensible person will permit himself to drift under influences so casual as these into a permanent office, or conclude without much closer investigation that because motives of that sort, legitimate as they may be, have bent his mind in this direction, therefore he has a divine vocation to be a minister. If for his future success it is essential that Christ's minister be truly chosen and sent by his heavenly Master, — as truly, though not so supernaturally or unmistakably as Jeremiah under the Old, or Paul under the New, Testament, — it is no less requisite for his own comfort that he should become well assured of his vocation ; able at every season of discouragement or disappointment or hardship to stay himself upon this, that a stewardship has been entrusted to him.^ In order to reach a rational and fairly confident persuasion on this point, it is needful to receive a two- fold " call " : one inward, which is personal and private ; the other exterior, public and official. Not the one without the other, but the one to sustain and confirm the other. What makes this double call requisite is, of course, the twofold relation which he who holds ecclesiastical 1 1 Cor. 917. 32 THE MODERN MINISTER of3&ce sustains, at once to the unseen Master to whom his whole life-work is due, and to the society whose agent and minister he is to be. For other kinds of religious work, it is immaterial whether a Christian's fitness be recognised by the society or not. It is enough that the man has heard in his own heart a personal summons to this form of service. Still, as in primitive days, we are constantly seeing laymen led through circum- stances and their own pronounced gifts to initiate or carry forward valuable enterprises of Christian activity; and neither they themselves nor anyone else questions that for such a task they have been really equipped and designated by a divine hand, although no hands of bishop or presbyter have been laid upon their heads. But for functions which are to be discharged in the name of the Church or under her authority, it is obvious that no supposed inward call can suffice. Into her ministry may no man intrude himself on the allegation that he is conscious of a call from Christ. Through whatever organ any particular branch of the Church is accustomed to express its will, some valid act of " ordination " must testify to the satisfaction of the Church body with the fitness of a candidate for office and set him apart for definite services. On the other hand, the ecclesiastical presupposes a personal vocation. The importance attached to this act differs in different communions; but no body of Christians, I think, professes to substitute it for an inward call of Christ, expressed to the conscience and heart of the man himself — a secret and personal convic- tion, antecedent to anything the Church may do, that it is the Lord's will he should serve, if permitted, in this and in no other vocation. I. How then shall a man perceive and judge of this private call from the Lord ? The question is one which not seldom occasions prolonged and severe searchings of heart in serious-minded young men ; and, in so far as a matter so intimate and personal, lying between the soul THE CALL TO THE MINISTRY 33 and God, admits of general rules at all, it deserves to be carefully answered. Let it be said, then, to begin with, that, like all similar questions regarding God's will for individuals, it can only be determined with greater or less probability after weighing well a variety of concurrent considerations. We have no right to look for such extraordinary and compelling signs as would silence all misgiving or render superfluous the exercise of the reason in the balancing of opposed considerations. This is not said merely of out- ward signs. Few are likely to attach much value to external messages from the unseen, such as dreams or voices or visions. But it sometimes happens that an inward impression on the mind is suffered to overmaster cool judgment, and is taken by an enthusiastic young person for a quite dominant and irresistible command from God. Now, unquestionably, a powerful and settled desire to enter upon the holy ministry is in every case a most important element, and one that can hardly be dis- pensed with in any case. Yet it is not to be taken simply by itself for conclusive proof that God means him who has it to be a minister. Few things, indeed, require more to be cross-examined than just this strong desire, especially when it is of sudden origin, or when it occurs in early life, or immediately after conversion to God. No wish more natural or honourable can spring up in the bosom of an ardent young believer. But it may have many sources, some of them anything but Divine. If the desire be of God, it will be attended with great tenderness of conscience, fear to be found unworthy or presumptuous, and a trembling solicitude lest one mistake the path of duty. To be genuine, moreover, it needs to be a longing, not for the sweets or honours of office, but for its spiritual successes, with a willingness to face for their sake sacrifices and toils. It must therefore be able to stand the test of delay and difficulty in the attainment of its object, and not shrink from strenuous labour in acquiring through years 3 34 THE MODERN MINISTER of training the requisite preparation for the right discharge of ministerial duty. Where the inclination for the ministry has thus proved itself a genuine and enduring outcome from the deepest religious experiences of the soul, and not a passing breath of enthusiasm, though it is not yet conclusive evidence of a " call," it does constitute the most important fact to start from as a basis. It not only entitles, it requires, the man to go on to search with prayerful conscientiousness for other indications that will confirm it. 1. High on the list of "gifts," the possession of which is an indication of fitness for the ministry, I am disposed to place the specific quahty of a man's piety. I do not mean merely that his piety be deep and strong. There is much strong deep piety of a too cloistered type, immured in the interior life, expressing itself in quiet meditation or secret prayer, which feels little need and betrays little desire to throw its energies out upon the evil world. The piety which finds in ministerial work its congenial sphere is of another type. Keenly alive to the religious needs of the society around, it is marked by profound sympathy with the Saviour in His saving work, an active compassion for the sinful, and an impulse to engage in whatever efforts for the kingdom of God lie to its hand. Where such features of the religious life are lacking, even a very devout person may prove ill-adapted for the winning and the upbuilding of souls. Where they are present in con- spicuous strength, they are so valuable that they make up for much else. A passion for saving others is to the Church what " public spirit '' is to the citizen in the State. It qualifies the citizen of the kingdom of God for official life. It stands high, therefore, among those gifts which mark out followers of Christ as fitted to "become fishers of men." 2. Next come, I think, certain combinations of moral and intellectual aptitudes, not often found united, but much in demand as promising ministerial success. A THE CALL TO THE MINISTRY 35 combination, for instance, of intellectual sobriety and good sense, with a capacity for being kindled into enthusiasm over great moral issues or high moral enterprises. A com- bination of prudence and self-control, with a frank, familiar, and winsome disposition which lays itself readily alongside of other people and gains their confidence. A combina- tion of the studious temperament, delighting in close study and severe thinking, with tact in dealing with men, and a fair amount of talent for practical affairs. Given such qualities as these, in rare but precious combination, you have a reasonable likelihood that such a man will make a useful minister, and a corresponding probability that his desire for the work is inspired of God. Of his possession of such qualities no man is himself the best judge. One's early advisers and those who know one most intimately are counsellors whom on these matters one does well to consult, since there is no doubt that it is here mistakes are most often made. Probably few ministers turn out badly through want of piety ; but who has not known instances in plenty in which some defect of character, even some fault in manner, or idiosyncracy of temperament, perfectly obvious to his companions, yet discovered too late, if discovered at all, by the man himself, has neutral- ised far more imposing qualities of mind and heart, or even wrecked in the end ministerial usefulness ? 3. Last come, what it seems scarce needful to name, since of these the Church as well as the candidate has to take account, a past life free from flagrant vice,^ the absence of incapacitating physical defects, sound health with a good voice ; and, of course, adequate scholarship, or at least means and ability to acquire it. ISTot one of all the matters I have named, greater or smaller, can be safely left out of reckoning when a man would settle with himself, /oro conscientice, tbe grave issue of his call to the ministry. It is not meant that every ^ This is, as a rule, desirable ; though, in vieAv of a few famous instances to the contrary, it cannot be called indispensable. 36 THE MODERN MINISTER qualification must be possessed in the highest, or in an exceptional, degree ; for then no man would be called. Some things can be better dispensed with than others. Some shortcomings can be compensated for by other advan- tages. What is meant is that a man's religious life, his natural aptitudes, his physical state, and his theological education need to be, each of them singly, and all of them together, fairly satisfactory. They are all matters in which any marked deficiency ought to be viewed as a grave disqualification, casting doubt on his fitness for office, and doubt by consequence on his vocation to enter upon office. Every student contemplating the ministry should be encouraged, at one stage of his preparation for it aftei* another, to review his conclusion on this momentous question of a " call " ere it be too late. Eor, as he advances, the favourable indications on which his judgment is built ought to emerge into greater clearness and to become more, not less, constraining. Absolute certainty it is scarcely reasonable to expect until actual trial of the ministry shall have put the seal of success in after years upon the judg- ment both of the man himself and of the Church. Yet a high and growing probabihty inferred, by calm and prayerful reflection, from many signs which multiply as step after step is taken on the path which leads to office — this a student of divinity may reasonably ask for and ought steadily to seek after. He who strives humbly and with earnestness to ascertain the mind of Christ in a matter which touches so closely the welfare of His kingdom, shall not always be left at a loss, but may count on secure guidance in the way the Master would have him go.^ 11. The action of the Church in conferring office constitutes a second " call " : an outward one, of which the result is to test and to confirm the conviction already 1 Consult Vinet, Theologie Pastorale, Introd. § 7 ; Blaikie, For tlie Work of the Ministry, cliap. 2 ; and Fairbairn, Pastoral Theology, chap. 2. Dr. Howard Crosby's Yale Lecture for 1879-80, entitled The Christian Preacher^ is devoted to the qualifications for the ministry. THE CALL TO THE MINISTRY 37 reached by the man himself in the secrecy of his own soul, that he has been qualified and called by Christ. It consists of two parts : first, an " examination " or inquiry to ascertain whether the conditions for ordination laid down by the particular Church are in this case satisfied ; and, next, the act of ordination itself. Each of these has an interest for us here, chiefly as it affects the confidence with which a young minister enters On his duties, or the success with which he is likely to discharge them. The points upon which it has always been and still is usual for the Church to satisfy itself before conferring office, are such as these : — 1. Age and physical health. The canonical age for a presbyter, originally fixed at thirty years,^ was in 1314 reduced to five and twenty ; and this was retained by most Eeformed Churches,^ although in this country at least I do not think any age limit is now strictly enforced. The absence of disabling defects, mental as well as physical, has always been insisted on. 2. Previous character and repute for Christian conduct, as testified by those who know him — usually his own minister or parish priest, and the head of his school or college. It has also been customary, immediately before ordination, publicly to call for objections to the candidate's life and conduct, and sometimes this step has also been taken in the parish to which he belongs. 3. The purity of his motives in desiring office is a matter variously inquired into ; often at a private interview, but usually by demanding in pubHc, if nothing more, at least a solemn disclaimer of simonaical practices or mercenary aims. 4. His orthodoxy : whether his beliefs are in sufficient accord with the creed of the Church. In many modern ^ By the Council of Neo-Csesarea in 314, and sanctioned by later councils and by the civil law, of. Edwin Hatch's art. " Holy Orders " in Smith and Cheetham's Diet, of Christ. Antiquities. 2 In the Dutch Church it is twenty-three (Van Oosterzee, PraUische Theologie, i. 50) ; and practically that may be regarded as the minimum acted on by the majority of British communions. 38 THE MODERN MINISTER communions this test has been attenuated to a minimum ; but, unless where a Church has no professed creed at all, it cannot be omitted. 5. His scholarship, general and theological. Whatever evidence on this head a Church requires, has, of course, been furnished at an earlier stage than the ordaining act : although a final examination in divinity may still (as with the Calvinistic Methodists of Wales) form part of the ordination services. Bodies which, like the State Churches of Germany, England, and Scotland, draw their students from national universities, can, of course, accept an academic degree as evidence of general scholarship. 6. Any proof the candidate may have already given of capacity for religious work, such as preaching, or of success in it. So far as I know, the Methodist Churches are those which have been led by their traditions to give to this last point the greatest attention. Naturally, details vary considerably in different com- munions ; but such diversities in practice are of minor consequence. The important thing for the individual minister is that the Church shares with him the responsi- bility of decision as to his fitness, and, consequently, to some extent as to his " call." I am far from saying that this task has always been discharged with thoroughness, or in the best way. Nevertheless, it can have no design but to safeguard the Church from unsuitable officials ; and, wher- ever it is gone about with care, the ordinand is entitled to accept the judgment of his Church as a weighty confirmation of his own — in respect at least to qualifications upon which the Church is competent to pronounce. It is not only the latest, it is one of the best pieces of evidence available, that he has not misread the will of God. Coming when it does at the critical moment of his career, it supplies a welcome support in his final act of self-dedication to the holy ministry. On this examination and testimony to fitness there has always followed in the ordinals of East and West a declara- THE CALL TO THE MINISTRY 39 tion of appointment, constituting the Church's own formal and solemn " call " to office. Originally this was probably the one essential part of admission to orders, succeeded at once by the ordinand's discharge of some characteristic duty of his office.^ But, of course, it was always befitting that at some stage in the ritual of ordination, the assembled Church should unite in a great act of intercession for the brother whom it was setting apart to sacred responsibiUties, and this was almost invariably accompanied by the im- position of the hands of the ordaining bishop. Eespecting the spiritual value of this part of the rite, there has grown up a serious divergence of opinion ; especially how far its virtue depends on the Church's prayers, how far on manual contact by episcopal hands. To lay hands on the head of one who is being ap- pointed to office was a Hebrew ceremony, of which two instances occur in the Book of Numbers.^ The ancient practice seems to have been in use among the Jews of later times at the installation of their judges,^ and thence to have passed naturally into the Apostolic Church. But the New Testament cases of its occurrence fall apparently into two distinct classes. When the Seven were set apart to serve tables, when Barnabas and Saul were designated as missionaries to the Greeks by the Church of Antioch, when presbyters were ordained by Timothy at Ephesus * — it is possible to regard the gesture which accompanied intercession as simply meant to designate the person prayed for, and by a significant action to express his setting apart for a special work. This is probably what Augustine meant by his often-cited words : " Quid aliud est manuum impositio, quam oratio super hominem ? " ^ By his time, however, a different interpretation of the act was ^ See Hatch, art. ** Ordination" in Smith and Cheetham. 2 When the Levites were set apart for service, Num. 8^°, and when Joshua was appointed as Moses' successor, ih. 27^^'-^, cf. Deut. 34^. ^ See Schiirer, Gcsh. d. jud. VolJces, ii. 152. '* Acts 6^ 133, 1 Tim. 5^2. ^ j^^ ^^^^, c. Donat, iii. 16. 40 THE MODERN MINISTER being introduced, based on the other class of Apostolic precedents. When the Apostles prayed over their converts that they might receive the Holy Ghost, they also laid their hands on them, as St. Paul, for example, did to Timothy to qualify him as his missionary delegate.^ Here the act has been taken to express a conveyance in some measure of that spiritual power which the Apostles possessed. So soon, therefore, as the idea entered that bishops were successors of the Apostles, it was inevitable to transfer to them this ability to convey the special gifts of the Spirit which qualify for office, and to connect with that the laying on of their hands in ordaining priests, as well as in confirming the baptized. This theory of ordina- tion is as old as the time of Cyprian, and had therefore been very long current before the awful words "Accipe Spiritum Sanctum " found their way into any ordinal. That did not happen in the West before the twelfth century. The Church of England has retained these words in her " Ordering of Priests " ; and this fact lends support to the claim of High Churchmen that admission to Anglican orders, though not a sacrament, as the Church of Kome teaches,^ does nevertheless convey through the bishop a '^^apiafia or grace of office. This effect ascribed to the rite was stated bv Hooker in these terms : " When we take ordination, we also receive the presence of the Holy Ghost, partly to guide, direct, and strengthen us in all our ways, and partly to assume unto Itself for the more authority those actions that appertain to our place and calling." That is to say, as he futher explains it : " Whether we preach, pray, baptize, communicate, con- demn, give absolution, or whatsoever, as disposers of God's mysteries, our words, judgments, acts and deeds are not ours, but the Holy Ghost's." ^ There is no need to take this widely accepted view of ordination in a crass materialistic fashion, as if manual 1 Acts 8"-i9, 2 Tim. l^. 2 Canons of Trent, Sess. vii. c. 9. 3 Eccl. Pol. Bk. V. 77-78. THE CALL TO THE MINISTRY 41 contact could be, or were imagined to be, a vehicle or medium by which spiritual grace is conveyed. Indeed, apart from the direct address : *' Eeceive the Holy Ghost," there is nothing even to suggest that the divine gift is bestowed by the bishop, of and from himself. No doubt he is supposed to effect what in the first age the Apostles effected. But it is open to say with St. Augustine, that the Apostles prayed for the Spirit to come upon those on whom they laid hands, did not themselves bestow Him, and that the Church in the person of its leaders observes still the same custom.^ It is therefore quite possible for a High Churchman to hold, as evangelical Churchmen do, that the effective portion of the rite is the bishop's inter- cession, and not the imposition of his hands. But, of course, he will still hold that the gift invoked by a successor of the Apostles, and by him alone, is as certainly bestowed and as abiding, as when the Apostles conferred the Spirit on the Christians of the first century. Nor does the Eeformed view, on the other hand, over- look the value of the Church's intercession, or reduce that to a bare form. It rejects the theory of episcopal suc- cession with the consequent limitation to bishops of the power to ordain. It does not suppose that under all circumstances the mere act of ordination secures to the ordained the abiding inward presence of the Spirit, although it does qualify him to administer the sacraments. Nevertheless the Eeformed Church has retained what seems to me to be of spuitual value in the rite ; that is to say, the solemn intercession of the Church as the Body of Christ in which His Spirit dwells. When the Eeformed Church, with or without the expressive and venerable usage of imposition of presbyters' hands, invokes from her living Head in heaven the gift of the Holy Ghost to equip His servant, at his entrance upon ^office, for every ^ " Orabant [apostoli] ut venirat in eos qiiibus manus imponebant, non ipsi eum dabant ; quern morem in suis prsepositis etiam nunc servat ecclesia " {De Trin. xv. 26). 42 THE MODERN MINISTER official duty, it asks for the very same blessing which episcopal ordination is believed to confer. The difference seems to be, that the divine answer to that prayer, as to all prayers, is here acknowledged to depend upon moral conditions of faith and obedience. More turns than on the CathoHc theory upon the spiritual condition of the man who is being ordained. If the Church, when it sets apart to office, possesses unconditional power to qualify for office by a supernatural " donation," irrespective of the man's rehgious receptivity, then it matters less whether he has been beforehand qualified by the secret and inward grace of Christ or not. Whereas, on the evangelical theory, ordination proceeds upon and recognises an existing fact. It presumes the man to be already prepared and equipped by the possession of spiritual gifts ; in particular, by such a hving fellowship with Christ through faith, as will enable him hereafter to receive from day to day, as the need arises, every grace-gift (;j^a/9tcr/Lta) which is called for by the sacred duties of his office. On this assumption, it asks for him as his constant endowment the abiding presence of the Spirit. The minister knows he has still his personal part to take in stirring up the gift of God which is in him.^ Upon his own fidehty and pray erf ul- ness, he knows, will largely depend the daily assistance of the Holy Ghost in every detail of His work. Never- theless, the ordination prayer is no empty word ; nor is it by any means the last, though it is the earhest, solemn act of intercession on his behalf in which the Church of God engages. Every conscientious minister who carries on his ministry in the spirit of that united prayer, — pray- ing for himself the while without ceasing, — feels that he can rely on the unceasing intercession on his behalf of the faithful upon earth, as well as of their High Priest above. Eeassured by this, he labours in confident expectation of an ample and a gracious answer. Nor can his hope be disappointed. He does receive the 'x^apla/jua of his office. 1 2 Tim. 1«. CHAPTEK V THE MINISTER'S DEVOTIONAL LIFE To maintain and to perfect his personal fitness for the work of ministry, so that his official functions shall become more and more the natural expression of his real hfe — this has now become for the young minister the first of duties. He has been approved and set apart to office simply on the ground that both he himself and the Church have judged him to be suited for it. By natural temperament, by inward graces of the Spirit, and by intellectual attain- ments, he is believed to have already reached, not com- pletely, yet to a promising degree, such adaptation to this calling that person and office answer to one another. In other words : he is what an official Christian needs to be ; on the other hand, the functions of the ministerial office are precisely such forms of activity as his life will most naturally run into of its own accord. For the supreme instance, ever-to-be-studied, of what this means, — the person and the official work quadrating or fitting into one another, — let him look to his blessed Lord Himself. Of the opposite, sad examples have been plentiful enough : ecclesiastics who mistook their calling ; men of quite alien tastes and aptitudes, on whom the clerical profession hung like an ill-fitting dress — something outside their real self and out of harmony with it. Cases of that sort give rise to " officialism." There is no " officialism," in the sinister sense which clings to that word, where the duties of a man's office are just what he loves best to do, that into which the deepest tides of his nature run spontaneously, 43 44 THE MODERN MINISTER and in the doing of which all that is best in him finds both satisfaction and reward.^ Such a correspondence between the man and his office can never be complete at the outset, that is, at his ordi- nation. Whatever general sympathy may already exist between his inner life and the service to which he is set apart, there must be a crowd of details about official life, its engagements and its methods, which are still strange to him. No one can quite know what his duties are to be or how he is to address himself to their performance, till he actually begins to do them. This is nothing peculiar to the ministry. In every calling the workman's hand has to get subdued, like the dyer's, to the stuff he works in. In every calling, moreover, the first enthusiasm of a young practitioner needs to be slowly replaced by conscientious habits of duty. More often perhaps than in other profes- sions does it happen that a young minister sets out with exaggerated or rose-coloured anticipations, or in a mood of exalted feeling which dies down as the commonplace realities of ministerial experience grow famihar to him. He will have to train himself always to obey the call of duty, even when it is unwelcome, and always to do his best, whether he be in a mood for it or not.^ About a process like this there are risks to be escaped or to be overcome, not without labour and self-discipline. It must not be taken for granted that the mere discharge of sacred offices for a certain length of time will of itself and without more ado bring about that perfect stage at which a minister's whole being is subdued to his work, and his work has become the spontaneous expression of himself. It is true that there is no better means of grace nor any finer training for the ministry, than just to do the work of it : provided always that it be done in the very spirit of it, ^ Cf. Schweizer, Pastor altheorie (1875), p. 223 ff. ^ For a realistic sketch of a minister's work, showing how unlike it is to the ideal with which one sets out, see Dr. Watson's Cure of Souls (Yale Lectures, 1896), pp. 227-234. THE MINISTER'S DEVOTIONAL LIFE 45 not as a function, perfunctorily, but as the utterance of a soul in fellowship with Christ. But then that is precisely the condition which it is so excessively hard to secure and to maintain. For of all plagues in ministerial life this is the most common, the most inveterate, and the sorest — that its duties tend to become perfunctory, professional and nothing more ; done correctly to the public eye, but without heart in the sight of God. For when a sacred duty becomes customary, it ceases to be so sacred to us. The sense of responsibility weakens by repetition. Holy awe at the solemn issues of one's work rubs off the soul with long practice, like bloom from the peach when it is handled. With this melancholy result in innumerable cases, that, in proportion as a minister gets used to the conventional way of conducting divine service and dis- charging other functions in his daily routine, does he find it difficult to do them in the old spirit, with a tender solemn fear, and a scrupulous care not to pro- fane them, and a humbling of his soul because of unworthiness. Now the only cure for perfunctory service is the cultivation of the interior hfe of devotion. This includes a sharpening of the conscience to perceive one's hidden faults ; a deepening of contrition for them when discovered ; a more abiding sense of the divine presence ; a firmer and less unstable reHance on the aid of the Holy Spirit : — every- thing, in short, which goes to make a holy man of God. In particular, I think that feature in personal religion is to be cultivated which we signahsed as the first to be asked after when one begins to contemplate the ministry at all : I mean, sympathy with the heart of Jesus in His Saviour- hood ; in His zeal for the Father's honour ; His pity for the lost ; His seeking till He find ; His lowly service of meanest needs ; His surrender of all things, even of life, for the salvation of others. To maintain this spirit of his Master, so far as he has it, and to deepen it, and to perfect it, ought to be, as I think, the first care of a true minister ; 46 THE MODERN MINISTER for none of his qualifications is so apt to be lost, and of none is the loss so disastrous. The means to be used for the cultivation of the inner life are so simple and well-known that they hardly need to be named. It is much to be wished, indeed, that the whole surroundings of a minister's life, his daily habits, his companionships, and his domestic arrangements, should as far as possible be of a kind to favour, and not repress, religious ardour, especially ardour in his Master's cause. Mainly, however, like every other Christian, he has to be dependent on seasons set apart for devotional reading, meditation, and prayer. The difficulty in the experience of most lies less in lack of will than in lack of leisure. Present-day ministers stand at a disadvantage, compared with their brethren of an older generation. The days are past when a clergyman's life could be described as a quiet one, with stated, but not too frequent, public appearances, separated by considerable intervals free from interruption, which could be devoted to other pursuits, to study, or to devotion. Survivals of this state of things may still be found in rural parsonages or in Highland parishes ; but in the industrial town or large city, the pressure on every minister's time, due to a whirl of public engagements, has crowded out the leisure which was once enjoyed for retire- ment, reflection, and prayer. His days are spent in public. His hours are claimed by ceaseless demands, arising in part from the organisation of the modern congregation, and in part from the so-called " religious world " outside. It has come to be a serious problem with many of us how far one is justified in surrendering to the social, phil- anthropic or semi-political " causes " for which a minister's active co-operation is expected, indeed, is all but demanded, hours which are required for higher things. Even the machinery of committees and societies by which ecclesiastical affairs have come to be carried on exacts from not a few active and willing men a waste of time against which they are beginning to rebel. Our modern methods of doing THE MINISTER'S DEVOTIONAL LIFE 47 Christian work of all kinds need, it seems to me, to be overhauled and simplified. Endless wheels revolve with small result. There is room for a better distribution of responsibility for what is every Christian's affair, a lightening of the load that is laid by tacit consent upon the shoulders of the clergy, with possibly an enhstment of larger aid from such of the laity as have leisure. At all events, no busy pastor ought to be suspected either of laziness or of lack of proper interest, who ventures firmly to decline outside engagements on the plea that his closet or his study is being starved. Another modern burden under which the minister, like other men in public office, sometimes groans, is his correspondence. His daily post-bag may be counted by dozens, yet courtesy requires a prompt return to every correspondent, who, writing on his own affairs, has forgotten, nevertheless, to enclose a stamp for reply. Even the harmless post- card is hardly accepted as a substitute for a letter. Nor does professional etiquette sanction as yet the cutting down of epistolary style to the curtness of a city office, and periphrastic politeness costs trouble. It is a ceaseless drain upon time and temper, as well as on the purse ; but it is one which a busy minister must tutor himself to accept as simply a part of his daily task. What makes the matter worse is that much of all this daily business is really of a secular character, only in name rehgious work at all. Therefore it not only squanders one's scanty leisure, it absorbs one's spiritual energies. By its multiphcity and pettiness, it conceals the sacredness of the minister's vocation. It renders more needful than ever that quiet brooding over divine themes which happier generations enjoyed, till in the stillness of devout musing a holy fire burned. If it never was so difficult, it has rarely been more necessary, for the minister to be a man of much private devotion. It is of no use to quarrel with the conditions of one's age. Granted that there are drawbacks in the din and 48 THE MODERN MINISTER stress of modern society, there are doubtless compensations also. Let the sensible minister take stock of his situatioji and make the most of it ; note its perils, and set himself to escape them. Let him cultivate intimacy with like-minded brethren. Let him seek inspiration from the most fervid evangehsts or missionaries he comes across. Let him be careful not to lose touch with the actual needs of the world — its sin and its suffering. Let him learn to utilise for self-recollection the few spare moments that are intercalated between the engagements of the busiest day, and cultivate the habit of ejaculatory prayer. All these things help. Above all, let him jealously guard such private hours as he can compass, remembering that times for devotion, if not likely to be found, have at any cost to be made. Among the High Church clergy, as in the best circles of the Catholic priesthood, a good deal of value is put upon " retreats " : prearranged seasons, that is, of deliberate withdrawal from ordinary ways for the discipline of the devout life through exercises which are partly social, but largely solitary. Such methods do not suit Protestant taste so well. Yet small fraternal conventions for similar purposes have been tried in other sections of the Church and found useful. These things may supplement, they cannot replace, daily and weekly periods of lonely devotion in the closet. Each man must arrange these as he best can. The morning half-hour, or hour, ere the day begins, before letters or newspapers have distracted one's thoughts ; a longer season once a week, preferably on Saturday evening as the Lord's Day approaches : these, with, of course, as I have just suggested, an occasional summons to oneself in the course of the day to recall the presence of God, and silent petitions shot up to Heaven at moments of conscious need: — these may be all that a busy pastor can afford. At rarer intervals, a whole day spared from holiday recreation for prolonged self-scrutiny and meditation is advisable. Many a minister, I am afraid, would confess THE MINISTER'S DEVOTIONAL LIFE 49 here to a record of failure — plans formed again and again, only to be broken. But he must never give in. This is the key of the position. For such hours of solitude with God he must fight as for the breath of his life. To let engagements, no matter how clamant, rob him of such hours, and to acquiesce in the loss of them, means failure. There is no sorer battle in ministerial hf e ; but defeat here is fatal. How the precious moments redeemed for secret worship can be best used, or what aids to devotion he shall employ, must be left to each man's own experience. Many will confine their reading at such times to Holy Scripture ; but it needs to be read meditatively and with self-application, not for scholarly study or to find material for sermons. Devotional books of the best class are not too numerous, but they are to be had. Some have found stimulus in the lives and diaries or letters of saintly men like Kutherford, Brainerd, Henry Martyn, or M'Cheyne. To others these memoirs do not appeal. One of the most searching and widely helpful books in English literature is Baxter's Reformed Pastor, which one American writer counsels the minister to read through once a year.^ Others find they can use with benefit a few choice manuals of Catholic devotion. Every man/ must be guided by what he finds most helpful. But such helps, however valuable, are not for everyday use, nor at any time of the first consequence. The great thing to aim at surely must be to come into the closest and most living contact with the Father of our spirits through His Son, reviewing in His presence one's work and the spirit in which it is done, that, having confessed with contrition its defects, one may catch afresh a holy enthusiasm from the altar of Jesus' Passion. For this must lead every earnest servant of Christ to register fresh vows of fidelity and to re-dedicate himself to his ministry with revived ardour. How it is done matters little. But the minister's communion with his Lord needs to 1 Shedd, Homiletics and Pastoral Theology (Edin. 1869), p. 281. 4 so ' THE MODERN MINISTER be intimate and unreserved. May we not fitly regard the hour of prayer as a workman's confidential interview with Him whose work he is doing, at which everything is talked over, with infinite reverence, yet frankly, with the generous Master, and instructions and assistance are received in view of fresh labours now to be attempted ? CHAPTEK VI MINISTERIAL CHARACTER Betwixt the interior life with its secret exercises, through which the minister strives to bring himself into ever closer accord with the spirit of his ministry, and the public functions of his office, there lies a wide intermediate region of action common to him with other men. It does not enter into the Protestant conception of a presbyter or clergyman that, like a Catholic priest, he should be separated as far as possible from ordinary life, social or domestic. Ever since the idea entered the Church at an early period in her history, that Jesus had counselled for certain of His followers a superior grade of virtue and of merit, which is optional, not obligatory upon all, the order of the priesthood has come to lead a removed or isolated existence, aiming at this more perfect type of saintship. Freedom from family ties, segregation in separate dwellings, ascetic self-discipline, virginal purity, a daily routine ordered by artificial rules, and a life wholly devoted to religious exercises : all these were steps in a historical process which has ended in denaturalising the presbyter into the priest, and concealing him behind a halo of unearthly sanctity, genuine or imaginary. Neither the seclusion of a celibate nor the ascetic- ism of a monk attaches to the ideal of an evangelical minister. For one reason, because he is simply the first in a brotherhood of saints, all of whom are his spiritual equals, sharing and sustaining his responsibilities. Also, because it contributes to his legitimate influence as a 51 52 THE MODERN MINISTER leader, counsellor, and exemplar, that he should mingle with little reserve in those social relationships which bind men to one another ; be husband and father, friend and neighbour, subject and citizen, like the rest. Above all, because true Christianity does not know of two ethical standards of conduct — two codes of moral duty : a lower level which is all that a man can reach who has to lead the secular life, and a higher to which he only may attain who abjures marriage, flees worldly society, and observes a peculiar style of living. That the holiness which suffices for a layman is too poor a degree of virtue to become the ecclesiastic who handles sacred things, is not a notion confined to persons trained in Catholic teaching. It has been found to creep in wherever an exalted reverence for clerical office has possessed the popular mind. Nor is there any security against artificial or imreal distinctions in morals, save by holding firmly to the principle that there can be but one standard of character for all alike — one perfect Christian walk in the Holy Spirit, obligatory on the humblest believer as much as on the bishop of souls. At the root of this exaggerated demand for ministerial sanctity, there is nevertheless a truth which it is of con- sequence for the minister to bear in mind. It is not unreasonable for the common people to expect their spiritual guides to be on the whole better men and better Christians than themselves. For although the same principles of conduct bind the pastor and the flock, yet they bind the pastor even more than his flock. All Christians alike ought to aim at the perfection of Christ, for we dare measure ourselves by no inferior model. But to approach that standard is popularly believed, not without reason, to be easier for the man whose days are screened in some measure from the usual temptations which beset life in the world, and are spent so largely in the things of reUgion. To fall below the standard, on the other hand, is worse and more discreditable in one who is set before the eyes of other men as a selected representative MINISTERIAL CHARACTER 53 of how a Christian ought to act. According to one ex- planation of the word " parson," it means the persona who represents the Church, in whom its ideal is embodied or its character illustrated.^ The reason assigned for this derivation, as Dr. Skeat remarks, " may well be doubted without affecting the etymology." ^ But the idea is a just one nevertheless. For, beyond doubt, every minister of Christ is, in Vinet's phrase, "I'homme symbole."^ He stands before the Church and before the public as an embodiment of the Christian ideal, a specimen Christian, from whom men may learn what a Christian ought to be. His life, as Philip Henry put it, " should be the book of the ignorant." No doubt, the public voice pushes this too far. Too much is popularly expected from ministers ; and religion is reproached for their defects to an extent which is excessive and unfair. That is true, I think, even where the inconsistencies of " the cloth " are not made by the profane a mere pretext for hostile attacks upon religion itself. Yet, however it may serve tlie purpose of irreligious critics to hold the Gospel responsible for the faults of its public servants, it remains true, and is to be seriously pondered by every minister, that he who has undertaken to be Christ's assistant in the task of showing others the way to heaven, has need himself to walk very closely in the Good Shepherd's footsteps. To say that he ought to be a follower of his Master is to say too little. He is called to be " an ensample to them that believe " ; ^ one who, with whatever modest misgiving or reserve, may yet borrow without flagrant presumption the bold exhortation of St. Paul : " Be ye imitators of me, even as I also am of Christ." ^ If we who hold office in the Church do not lay to heart as we ought this more urgent reason for blameless conduct which lies upon us, other people do not forget it. The world never does. The Church rarely does. 1 Shedd, ut supra, p. 282. ^ Etymological Diet., S2ch voce. 3 TMol. Pastorale, 2me ed., Paris, 1854, p. 140. *» 1 Tim. 412, cf. Tit. 2\ ^ 1 Cor. US cf. 4i«. 54 THE MODERN MINISTER So that, while the very highest type of honourable and irreproachable character is never deemed anything to boast of in a minister of Christ, very slight faults call down severe censure from all but the most charitably-minded persons. ]S"or is it without good cause that by some modern German authorities this subject of clerical morality is handled in connection with pastoral duty, as at once the prime condition for its right discharge, and the chief source of the pastor's influence.^ But, in truth, it is not his pastoral usefulness alone, it is the success of his ministry as a whole, which requires the minister to be an exceptionally good man. No doubt ministerial success of the highest kind is conditioned on the superhuman power of the Spirit of God. In so far, however, as it is affected by the human instrument at all, it is far more affected by his goodness than by intellectual ability. The most useful ministers are by no means always the ablest, still less the most eloquent. The influence which a minister wields is moral influence, built on the confidence, respect, and affection which men always give to one whose life re- commends his message and puts detractors to shame. Words have little weight unless backed by a consistent example ; private dealing in such a case only provokes contempt ; ministrations without heart are instinctively detected and leave no blessing. The whole value of our work, in short, is put in hazard when it is not penetrated by that indefinable sense of moral authority which belongs to character and to nothing else. Says Baxter : " One proud, surly, lordly word, one needless contention, one covetous action, may cut the throat of many a sermon, and blast the fruit of all you have been doing." To name all that a minister ought to be would be to rehearse the complete circle of Christian graces. But within the ideal of the all-round Christhke character, incumbent ^e.g. Schweizer, op. cit., Dritter Theil ; Palmer, Pastoraltheologic (1863), pp. 143-209 ; Achelis, Praktische Thcol. (1890) p. 467 flf. MINISTERIAL CHARACTER 55 on him as on every Christian, there is a specialised type, determined by the conditions of his calling, which it is usual to speak of as the ministerial character; just as there certainly are faults which deform it more than others do, and which more quickly dissipate his official influence. For both of these we cannot do better than study the indications scattered through the New Testament as to what a church officer is expected to be ; especially the directions given in the Pastoral Epistles for the selection of presbyters, as well as for the guidance of Timothy and Titus themselves.^ To some extent, it is true, these are coloured by local conditions and by the habits of the time. Yet in the main they are applicable everywhere and in every age of the Church. Guided by these inspired directories, we reach the following as leading features in ministerial character : — 1. The groundwork of the character described seems to consist in that grave or serious frame of mind which goes with habitual self-command.^ Obviously this befits the sacred and responsible position of a minister. It is not inconsistent with constitutional cheerfulness or even with playfulness on occasion. But it excludes uncontrolled outbreaks of temper ; it requires all indulgence of the senses to be severely temperate ; and it suggests sobriety or moderation in one's judgments on men and things, as well as a gravity of deportment which is neither austere nor sour. The passionateness of a hasty nature and the frivolity of a shallow one are equally out of place. 2. Close on the heels of this follows the gentle or pacific temperament, tutored to meet opposition with patience, and to bear contumely or wrong without undue resentment. " The Lord's servant must not strive, but be ^ Fully treated by Fairbairn in his work on The Pastoral Epistles j cf. also Vilmar, Lehrhuch d. Fastoraltheologie (1872), pp. 39-56. ^ The student should examine the precise force of (rib