I ill 7721 A535 T83 QJnrnpU ICaui ^rlynnl ICibrary Cornell University Library KF7721.A535T83 An analytical digest of the pension and 3 1924 020 607 341 The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924020607341 AN ANALYTICAL DIGEST OF THB PENSION BOUNTY LAND LAWS, DECISIONS OF SECRETARIES AND OPINIONS OF ATTORNEY-GENERALS THEREON, FOKMS AND REGULATIONS PRESCRIBED BY THE PENSION OFFICE, AND EXPLANATORY COMMENTS. THE WHOLE SO ARRANGED AS TO BE INTELLIGIBLE TO EVEEY CLAIMANT. BY F. F. C. TRIPLETT, IiATE CHIEF CLERK OP THE PENSION OFFICE. WASHINGTON, D. C. 1864. / (Surgeon- General's and Paymaster's). Per day, $2. (Aprils 1777), Assistant rfo. to (^0., per day, $0.66|. (Same date.) ' (Of Com'y of A. C. G.). Per month, $35. (June 16, 1777.) " ®50- (August 7, 1777.) (Of Ass't Com'y). Per month, $50. (May II, 1779,) W Provosts). " $33J. (May 27, 1778.) \'VOo">'y of ^i^ii'^'m Stores). Per month, $40. (February 11 1778 ^ (Of Field-Commissary). Per month, $40. (February 18, 1779) REVOLtTTIONARY PAY-TABLE. 71 CLERK (contiHued). (Of Clothier-General). Pay of Army Auditor's Clerk. (April 15, 1779.) to/ the Scales). Pay, per month, $35. (May 11, 1779). (Of Adfi-Gen'l). Pay of Captain. (May 17, 1779.) COMMISSARY (General, of Stores and Provisions). Pay, per month, $80. (June 16, 1775.) (Deputy do.) Pay, per month, $60. (July 29, 1775.) i General, of Purchases). Pay, per day, $8. (June 16, 1777.) Deputy do.) " " $5. " " Assutant). " " $4. " " lU Purchasing Commissaries allowed a commission instead of salary. (Mar«b 13, 1778.) 'A. 0. G. of P., at Head-Quarters). Pay, per day, $5, (April 14, 1778.) 'C. G. of P.) Pav, per annum, $4,000. (January 1, 1780.) D. C. G. of P.) " per month, $125. (November 30, 1780.) lA. 0. of P.) " " $75. Superintendent of Live Slock). Pay, per month, $50. (November SO, 1780.) Deputies employed by said Superintendents, pay, per month, $27. (June 16, 1777.) (Of Musters). Pay, per month, $40. (June 16, 1775.) " " of Colonel. (August 7, 1777.) y>'y C. G. of do.) Pay, per month, $100. (August 7, 1777.) *Dep'yG.ofdo.) " " $60. " " * Of Artillery). " " $30. (July 29, 1775.) *D. C. of do, in H. Department). Pay, per month, $33J. (March 14, 1777.) 'D. C- of Stores at N. Y.) " " $30. (October 9, 1776.) 'C.G.ofdo.) " " $100. (Febnjary 11, 1778.) 'D. O. G.ofdo.) " " $60. " " (A. a of do,) " " $50. (0. of Clothing). Pay of Major. (October 16, 1776.) C. to Surgeon). " per day, $2. (April 8, 1777.) C. G. of Prisoners). PayofColoneL (June 6, 1777.) 'D.C.ofdo.) " of Major. " " 'C. G. of Issues). Pay, per month, $150. (June 16, 1777.) D. C. of do.) " " $75. 'AssistC.ofdo.) " " $40. < Surgeon's Mate, " " $0.66f. " " Storekeeper, " per month, $4. " " Nurse, " " $2. " " Deputy Director-General, pay, per day, $5. (April 8, 1777.) Assistant do. " " $4. (February 6, 1778). Commissary, " " $4. n f the United States in such cases provided. [Approved, April 25, 1808.] An act authorizing the President of the United States to raise certain companies of rangers for the protection of the frontier of the United States. Sec. 1. Be it enacted by the Senate and Mouse of Representatives of the United States of America in: Congress assembled, That the President of the United States, whenever he shall have satisfactory evidence of the actual or threatened invasion of any State or Terri- tory of the United States, by any Indian tribe or tribes, be, and he is hereby, authorized to raise, either by the acceptance of volunteers or enlistment for one year, unless sooner discharged, as many com- panies as he may deem necessary, not exceeding six, who shall serve on foot, or be mounted, as the service in his opinion may require, shall act on the frontier as rangers, be armed, equipped, and ol-gan- ized, in such manner, and be under such regulations and restrictions, as the nature of the service, in his opinion, may make necessary. Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That each of the said com- BETWEEN REVOLUTIONARY WAR AND WAR OF 1812. 85 panics of rangers shall consist of one captain, one first, one second lieutenant, one ensign, four sergeants, four corporals, and sixty privates. Sec. 3. And he if further enacted, That when the said rangers arm and equip themselves, and provide their own horses, they shall be allowed, each, one dollar per day, and without a horse, seventy- five cents per day, as fuU compensation for their services, rations, or forage, as the case may be. The commissioned officers shall receive the same pay and rations as officers of the same grade in the army of the United States. ,_ Sec. 4, And be it further enacted, That the officers, non-commis- sioned officers, and privates, raised pursuant to this act, shall be entitled to the like compensation in case of disability, by wounds and otherwise, incurred in the service, as officers, non-commissioned officers, and privates, in the present military establishment, and with. them shall be subject to the rules and articles of war, which have been established, or may hereafter by law be established ; and the provisions of the act entitled "An act fixing the military peace esta- blishment of the United States," so far as they may be applicable, shall be extended to all persons, matters, and things, within the in- tent and meaning of this act, in the same manner as if they were inserted at large in the same. This act shall take effect, and be in force, from and after the passage thereof, and continue in force irampus, and for other purposes. Sec. 1. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Jiejoresentativea (f the United States of America in Congress assembled, That for the purpose of fixing the time at which shall commence the pensions, under the existing laws, of the ■v^idows of the officers, seamen, and marines, who were lost in the United States schooner Grampus, as well as the time to which the pay of said officers, seamen, and marines, shall be allowed, the twentieth day of March, one thousand eight hundred and forty-three, shall be deemed and taken to' be the day on which the said schooner Grampus foundered at sea ; and that, for the like purposes, the first day of May, one thousand eight hun- dred and thirty-nine, shall be deemed and taken to be the day on which the United States' schooner Sea Gull was lost in like manner. Sec. 2. And be it further enacted. That if any of the said officers, seamen, or marines, shall have left no widow, or having left a widow, she shall have died before the passage of this act, and there shall be living at the date of the passage of this act a child or children of said officers, seamen, or marines, under sixteen years of age, such child* or children shall be entitled to the same pension to which the widow, had there been one as aforesaid, would have been entitled, for the like period of five years ; but in case of the death or intermar- riage of the widow before the expiration of the said term of five years, the said pension for the remainder of the said term shall go to the PRINCIPLES AND DECISIONS. 153 ^ild or children of the said deceased officer, seaman, or marine : Provided, That such pension shall cease upon the death of such child or children. Sec. 3. And he it further enacted, That the proper accounting officers of the Treasury Department be, and they are hereby, autho- rized and directed to settle the accounts of James S. Thacher, late purser in the navy, who was lost in said schooner Grampus, with all his accounts and vouchers for expenditures and payments made by him, and with all the money, stores, and supplies, procured for the use of said vessel, and to allow him a credit for whatever sum appears to be due from him on the books of the department. [Approved, June 15, 1844.] PRINCIPLES AND DECISIONS. No. 1. Over-payments, when to he retained. Assuming that the pension of Mrs. Gardner ought not to have been continued under the acts of 1819 and 1824, it does not follow that she is to be regarded as a debtor to the government for the amount received under these two acts. On the contrary, I think that, inas- much as the tribunal to whom the construction of these laws was con- fided by the government decided that Mrs. Gardner was embraced by their provisions, and the pension was paid to her under that decision, she is entitled to hold the money. The interpretation then given by the comp*etent authority having jurisdiction of the subject cannot now be revised or reversed by their successors in the same office, so as to affect the rights of those who have received pensions, although the construction then given should now be deemed erroneous. The case would be different if any mistake of fact had been com- mitted, or the government imposed on by false testimony^. The act of the last session of Congress in relation to these pensions, conforms in its language to the act of 1817 ; and Mrs. Gardner is entitled to a pension under this law. Being so entitled, she has, in my opinion, the right to receive her pension J and the money which was paid to her under the laws of 1819 and 1824 cannot be set off against it. She is not debtor to the public for what she has before received under the decision of the tribunal established by the govern- ment to decide on her rights; and that sum cannot, therefore, be retained as a set-off against the money which, under the late law, is due to her from the public. [Opinion of Altoriiey-Greneral, October 24, 1839.] The act for the relief of the widows and orphans of the officers, seamen, and marines of the sloop-of-war Hornet, fixes the 10th day of September last as the day up to which their arrears of pay should be calculated. Any moneys advanced for pay supposed to have accrued after that period, were advanced by mistake, and may be recovered. The same act gives to the widows, children, parents, &c., a sum equal to six months' pay of their respective deceased relatives. 154 NAVT AND MARINE -WIDOWS' PENSION ACTS. Where over-pay has been advanced to the same parties entitled to this bounty, they are both debtors and creditors to the United States. In such cases, the right of retainer, by deducting the amount advanced, would seem to be allowable. But when the money was advanced to a person other than the one entitled under the provisions of the act to the bounty which it allows, such deduction cannot be permitted. Even against the right of retainer in the first place,. it may be urged that Congress has provided expressly for the exercise of this right in certain cases, not including that under consideration ; but it seems to me that these provisions may be considered as direc- tory, and for the enforcement of a principle of retainer which exists independently of them. [Opinion of Attorney-General, June 4, 1830.] No. 2. Pension claim is a vested right. The case and question submitted for my opinion are the following : " During the late war a person lost his life on board a private armed vessel, while acting in the line of his duty, leaving a widow, and chil- dren under the age of sixteen years. By the acts of Congress on the subject of pensions, the widow was entitled to a monthly allow- ance from the privateer pension fund. She omitted, however, pre- ferring any claim for several years ; but now, having intermarried, she has applied for the pension on behalf of the children, some of whom are yet under the age of sixteen years, and also for the portion of pension to which she was entitled during her widowhood. " Question. — Is the applicant, having ceased to be the widow, legally entitled to receive a pension for the interval between the death of her former husband and her second marriage ?" Here is a certain right which the law says shall accrue to the widow on the happening of a certain event — that of her husband having died by reason of a wound received in the line of his duty on board of a private armed vessel. The law does not require either that an application should be made by her, or that anything else should be done in order to consummate her right. It is consummated by the mere fact of the death of her husband under the circumstances already mentioned. It is a vested right to so much money per annum, for five years, subject, however, to be discontinued and defeated by her death or marriage at any time within that term, but a vested and perfect right during the time that she continues to live the widow of her deceased husband ; and not defeated by her subse- quent intermarriage, except from the time at which such intermar- riage takes place. [Opinion of Attorney-General, June 9, 1825.] A woman after her marriage, or rather her husband in her right, may receive that portion of the pension which grew due during her widowhood ; but all the laws discontinue the pension on her marriage. [Opinion of Attorney-General, July 22, 1828.] PRINCIPLES AND DECISIONS. 155 Althougli the observations made by the Attorney-General in his opinion of June 9, 1825 Isupra], were made in reference to a case arising under the 1st section of the act of 1814 (which section relates to private armed ships), the principle laid down by the Attorney- General is equally applicable to other cases. He also says that the right of pension does not depend on the necessities of the parties. " It is given to the widows and children of officers and men, of rich and poor, without regard to their circum- stances. It is in the nature of an absolute engagement or promise made to those officers and men, that if they fall in the service of their country ,_ so much shall be paid to their wives and children, without inquiry into the factVhether they stand in need of it or not. Nor is there any condition annexed to the promise, that the money shall be paid^ if applied for in a given time, or in a given state of things. It is bottomed only on the single condition that the husband and father shall die in the service of his country ; on the happening of which condition, the public engagement becomes a debt, which is as much property/, and the property of the widow and children, as any bond which the deceased may have left to them by his will." [Opinion of Attorney-General, April 5, 1836.] No. 3. Children, how long entitled, The uniform practice, I understand, has been to discontinue the pension after the child had reached the age of sixteen ; and although the laws do not expressly declare that it shall be so, yet the manifest policy and reason of the provision, and the uniformity of the limit of sixteen years in every act, would seem to justify the construction which has thus practically been put upon the laws, as giving the sense of Congress. [I''-] No. 4. Half Mood. The civil law of the Roman empire admitted the half blood to an equal participation in the inheritance with the whole blood, prior to the novel ordinance of Justinian, which allowed them to inherit only on failure of whole blood. The half blood is entirely excluded by the law of England ; but this is the result of an extremely artifi- cial rule of evidence. This English rule of evidence is inapplicable to the condition of things in the United States, and the principle which flows from it has, consequently, been disregarded. As, however, the regulation of descent belong to the different States, the legislation on this subject is various and conflicting. The tendency of legislation in the differ- ent States has been, to restore the half blood to the rights from which they were excluded by the civil law and by the law of England. 156 NATT AND MARINE WIDOWS' PENSION ACTS. The fund to be distributed is a bounty of the government, awarded for faithful service, and for the sacrifice of life in the discharge of pdblic duty. The colMeral relatives of the half blood are, in iny Opinion, entitled to participate equally with those of th« whole blood. [Opinion of Attorney-General, November 19, 1830.] No. 5. ^ate of pension. The law takes the half pay of the dece^sfed ofBcer> seaman, or marine, as the measure of his pension, so that twenty years' pension cannot exceed twenty years' half pay. [(pinion of Attorney :Geher'al, July 32, 1828.] The act of March 3d, 1817, prOvidesi, that if any officer belonging to the navy of the United States shall die in consequence of disease contracted, or of casualties or injuries received, while in the line of his duty, &c., leaving a widow, such widow shall be entitled to receive " half the monthly pay to which the deceased was entitled at the time of his death," to continue for the term of five years, &e. This law must undoubtedly be regarded as furnishing the general rule by which the rights of Mrs. Henley are to be settled ; and although we are obliged to refer to other laws regulating the pay of officers of the navy, yet, so long as such pay was made by the month, no difficulty could arise in its application. Even where the monthly pay may have been increased sinde 1817, the principle would be the same ; the language of the act of 1817 being such as to accommodate itself to the monthly pay, whatever it may have been, to which the deceased officer Was entitled at the time of his death. Until the enactment of the late act " to rfegulate the pay of the navy of the United States," passed March 3d, 1835, captains in the navy were paid at the rate of one hundred dollars per month when commanding ships of thirty-two guns and upwards. Commodore Henley's case would have been governed by this law, had it not been for the new provision inserted in the act of 1835, which virtually repeals all former laws on the subject, and adopts the principle of towMaZ instead of monthly pay; fixing that of captains in command of squadrons on foreign Stations at four thousand dollars. To this annual pay Commodore Henley, as I understand, was entitled at th6 time of his death ; and it is therefore urged, in behalf of his widow, that she is entitled, under the act of 1817, to the one-half of this sum per year, or the twelfth part of it per month, as her pension. On the other hand, the Secretary of the JNaVy is of opinion that the act of 1835 was passed without any reference to pensions, and haS decided that, until Congress otherwise direct, pensions mast be granted according to the mohihiy pay to which the officer Was entitled, hf law, at the time When the act grafting such pehsions was passed. It is upon this decision, from which Mrs. Henley has appealed to the Presidept, that my opinion is required. PRINCIPLES AND DECISIONS. 157 It may be admitted as highly probable that the act of 1835 was framed without any special regard to the pension law, and that its effect was not considered by Congress ; but I cannot entirely subscribe to the opinion that pensions are to be limited to one-half the monthly pay established by the former laws. I think it very certain that Congress, in passing the act of 1835, intended to raise the pay proper to naval oflBcers ; and, so far as this was intended to be done, it appears, to me it ought to produce a corresponding increase of the pension. The mere fact that the pay, instead of being fixed at a monthly sum, is to be paid quarterly or annually, and that it is spoken of as annual pay, does not, in my judgment, prevent the application of the rule given by the law of 1817, provided it be prac- ticable to ascertain the precise amount of pay proper given by the new law. The pension law of .1817 seems to have been framed with a view to meet the case of an increase in the monthly pay, as well as of differences in the amount to which the officer may be entitled, arising from other circumstances ; and therefore expressly provides that the pension shall be, not " one-half of the monthly pay given and established by the laws now in force" (which is the construction adopted by the Secretary of the Navy), but " one-half the monthly pay to which the deceased was entitled at the time of his death." We are, therefore, as it seems to me, obliged to resort to the law of 1835, by which Commodore Henley's pay was regulated and fixed at the time of his death ; and are not at liberty to take the amount fixed by the former law, which, as already observed, is repealed by the act of last session. But I am by no means prepared to say that the widow is entitled to one-half the gross sum prescribed by the act of 1835. It is ob- vious, from the history of this law, and from its, provisions, that Con- gress intended to include in the gross sum fixed by it, not only a cer- tain amount of pay proper, (considerably increased beyond the monthly pay given by the former law,) but also to embrace an allow- ance for all the rations but one, and for sundry other perquisites. And as the pension laws have never been so framed as to give any part of those rations and perquisites to the widow or children of the officer, but, on the contrary, are carefully limited to one-half of the pay proper, I think the pension to be allowed to Mrs. Henley ought to be confined to one-half of so much of the annual sum of four thou- sand dollars as may be found to be referrable to pay proper. The rations, (over one ration per day,) and the other perquisites, to which an officer in the situation of Commodore Henley at the time of his death would have been entitled under the laws in force on the second of March, 1835, must be deducted from the sum of four thousand dollars ; and the one-half of the residue, after such deduction, will, in my opinion, be the proper annual pension to be allowed to Mrs. Henlev [Opinion of Attorney-General, July 20, 1835.] The act of 1835 allows one ration per day, besides the annual pay ; but all the rations allowed by previous acts are merged in the gross sum given for annual pay, and should therefore be deducted, together 158 NAVY AND MARINE "WIDOWS' PENSION ACTS. with the other perquisities so merged, in order to ascertain what was really intended to be allowed for pay proper. [Opinion of Attorney-General, August 17, 1835.] Mrs. Coxe now claims the same pension to which she would have been entitled had her husband been actually appointed a lieutenant before his death, on the ground that he had been acting as lieutenant, and in that capacity had rendered very meritorious services ; and on the ground, also, that he had been nominated by the President to the Senate for promotion to a lieutenancy ; and which nomination would undoubtedly have been confirmed, had he not died before the action of the Senate could be had thereon. The question for my opinion is, whether she is to receive a pension on account of her deceased husband as a midshipman or lieutenant ? My opinion is, that his acting as lieutenant, and his being nominated by the President for promotion, could not change his rank until the confirmation of the Senate. This confirmation was prevented by his death. He died a midshipman, and his widow must receive a pen- sion accordingly. [Opinion of Attorney-General, April 27, 1839.] The monthly pay on the 1st January, 1835, governs the rate of pension, and not the increased annual pay given by the act of March 3, 1835. [Secretary of the Interior, case of Sarah Mersereau.] This decision, made by the present Secretary, overturns the one made by the Attorney-General, on the 20th July, 1835, given above. No. 6. Arrears, to whom payable. The case stated in your letter of the 26th January is as follows : — " During the late war with England, an individual was killed on board of a private armed vessel of the United States, in an action with a British ship^ His widow did not apply for a pension. She married again ; but the second husband, during her life, did not prefer the claim. After her death, he demanded the pension from the date of the first husband's death to the time of the second mar- riage. The woman had no children." On this case you inq-uire — 1st, Whether a pension shall be paid ? and, if so, 2d, Who is the proper person to receive it ? The opinion of the Attorney-General dated the 9th of June, 1825, and transmitted on that day to the Secretary of the Navy, settles the first of these questions in the affirmative. Your second question must be solved by applying to the present case the rules of law in regard to the right of the husband in the property of his wife, in force in the State where the parties resided at the time of his wife's death. By the law of England, the husband, if he survives his wife, is entitled to administer on her estate, and to recover all debts due to her at the time of marriage, and all her other outstanding choses in action, for his own use, subject only to his liability for debts contracted by her whilst a femme sole, to the extent of the assets received by him. This is the general rule in the PRINCIPLES AND DECISIONS. 159 American States ; though in Maryland, and perhaps in some other States, the husband has been relieved from the necessity of taking out letters of administration. [Opinion of Attorney-Genera!, April 5, 1835.] To entitle a woman, as the widow of an officer, seaman, or marine, to the pension given by the law, she must have remained in a state of widowhood. The party serving must die leaving a widow ; and it is ^^siich ividow" — that is, the widow left by the decedent, and the widow of the decedent — who is entitled. Mrs. Timberlake, having remarried, can therefore claim no benefit under the act. "Where the decedent has left a widow and children, and the former has married before the passage of the act, the children, within the equity of the law, and by a liberal construction of its provisions, are entitled to its benefits. I am accordingly of opinion that the children of Purser Timberlake are entitled to the half pay granted by the first section of the act, from the death of their father, to cease on their death, or on their attaining the ago of twenty-one years. [Opinion of Attorney-General, April 7, 1837.] I have the honor to inform you, that, as Mrs. Murray died before the passage of the act under which the claim is made, I am of opinion no right to any of the benefits granted by that law was vested in her, to be passed to her representative. In similar cases arising under the general pension law of the fourth of July, 1836, I had occasion to adopt this principle ; and, though many considerations may well be urged in favor of extending the law so as to reach these cases, yet it is only to Congress that they can properly be addressed. [Opinion of Attorney-General, April 11, 1837.] I have the honor to inform you, that if (as I understand is the fact) the steward serving on board a ship-of-war is borne on the ship's books as one of the crew, and is amenable to martial law, I think he must be regarded as a seaman, within the pension laws, so as to en- title his widow to a pension. In the particulars stated, such a case is entirely distinguishable from that of the hospital steward to which VOU refer [Opinion of Attorney-GencrEil, November 18, 1837.] So soon as this law passed, the pensioner became entitled, in my opinion, to his arrearages of pension, as fully as he was to the pen- sion itself; and although he died without having received what was due to him, still the money does not belong to the Navy -Pension Fund, but must be paid over to his legal representatives. [Opinion of Attorney-General, March 23, 1839.] No. 7. Special acts. It is very possible that the Congress which passed the_ act of March 2, 1821, (a special act in Mrs. Perry's favor,) may, in point of fact, have been ignorant of the act of March 3, 1817, and of the rights of Mrs. Perry under it. But the legal presumption is directly 160 NAVY AND MARINE WIDOWS* PENSION ACTS. the reverse ; and as there is. nothing in the act of 1821 to exclude Mrs. Perry from the benefits of the former law, or to limit her in the enjoyment of the rights vested in her thereby, I do not see upon ■what principle it can now be done. I am accordingly of opinion that the act of 1821 is to be regarded as a grant to her and her family, over and above her pension under the act of 1817. [Opinion of Attorney-Generalj November 3, 1836.] It is assumed, in your statement of the case, that Mrs. Decatur would be entitled to the pension granted by the act of the third ulti- mo, "for the more equitable administration of the Navy Pension Fund," were it not for the doubt created by the passage, on the same day, of the joint resolution for her special benefit. And, on these two laws, you inquire whether she is entitled under the resolution, or under the act, or under both ? This case differs from that of Mrs. Perry, referred to in the note of Mrs. Decatur, accompanying your letter^ inasmuch as the law un- der which Mrs. Perry ultimately obtained her pension was in exist- ence at the time of his death ; at which time she was also entitled (although not aware of the fact) to its benefits. I held, in her case, that the law granting her annuity (for such it was called) could not deprive her of a pension given by a pre-existing law ; and that, as Congress were presumed to be acquainted with the laws in force, the legal intendment must be that the annuity was designed as an addi- tional provision, and, consequently, that she was entitled to both. After maturely considering the history of the general and special provisions on which the present case depends, I am of opinion that but one pension can be allowed ; but if the general provision includes the case of Mrs. Decatur, then I am of opinion she is entitled to take under that provision, or under the joint resolution, at her election. [Opinion of Attorney-General, April 11, 1837.] One entitled to a pension, both under a general law and a special act, must elect between them, and, having made the election, is bound by it. [Secretary of the Interior, case of Mary A. Tliompson.] No. 8. Twenty years' service. Doctor Page was commissioned as a surgeon in the navy in 1811; resigned in 1824 ; was reappointed in 1827, and died in the naval service in 1832. His widow now claims a pension as having been the wife of a sur- geon of more than twenty years' standing in the navy. My opinion is, that she is not entitled to a pension upon the principle set up by her. The two commissions, and the service under them, cannot be united for the purpose of justifying a claim for the amount claimed by the petitioner. When he resigned his first commission, he became a private citizen; and had he died before his second appointment, his widow would have been entitled to no pension whatever ; and it is- only by virtue of his second commission that she is entitled to a pen- PRINCIPLES AND DECISIONS. 161 sion at all ; and, in my judgment, the law will not warrant the taking mto view his services under the first commission, in computing the time which is to determine the amount of the pension of his widow. Therefore, it seems to me, she is entitled to a pension as the widow of a surgeon who was commissioned in 1827 and died in 1832. [Opinion of Attorney-General, June 1, 1839.] No. 9. Suicide. Suicide in a fit of insanity, superinduced by disease contracted in the line of his duty, entitles the widow to a pension. [Secretary of the Interior, case of R. G. Cooper.] No. 10. Construction of Acts. Acts of January 20, 1813; March 4, 1814; March 3, 1817; May 23, 1828; and June 28, 1832. Considering the force of the word ^'■officer" in the act of January 20, 1813, and of the word '■'■'belonging" in the second section of the act of March 4, 1814, I am of opinion that, in the true construction of the acts in question, the death must take place while the party is in service. If he dies after his discharge, it is not " an officer of the navy or marines," nor "an officer, seaman, or marine, belonging to the navy of the United States," who is killed or dies; but a person who has been such officer, seaman, or marine. The idea that the death must have occurred in the service, was evidently entertained by Congress, when they passed the continuing acts ot May 23, 1828, and June 28, 1832, which may be regarded as a legislative construc- tion of the acts of 1813 and 1814 ; and when, in addition to this, we have the express provision of the act of March 3, 1817, confining the death to the period of service, I am now satisfied, (though I confess I see no great justice in such restriction,) that these acts were in- tended to be confined in the same way. [Opinion of Attorney-General, July 1, 1838.] Acts of January 20, 1813; March 4, 1814; March 3, 1817; March 3, 1819; and January 22, 1824. With regard to public armed vessels. — The act of January 20, 1813, "providing navy pensions in certain cases," enacts, "that if any officer of the navy or marines shall be killed or die, by reason of a wound received in the line of his duty, leaving a widow, or if no widow, a child or children, under sixteen years of age, such widow, or if no widow, such child nr children, shall be entitled to receive half the monthly pay," cS' i have given the punctuation of this act as it stands printed in tlic fourth volume of the Laws of the United States, page 486 ; according to which punctuation, the construction of the law would seem to be, that, if any officer of the navy or ma- ll 162 NAVY AKD MARINE WIDOWS' PENSION ACTS, rines should, 1st, be killed by reason of a wound received in the line of his duty, or, 2d, die by reason of a wound received in the line of bis duty, his widow and children should have the provision made by the act. According to this construction, the only difference between the two cases consists in the officer's being killed immediately, upon the spot, or dying some time afterwards, in consequence of the wound. But, in both cases, the death is to be produced by a wound ; — by a wound received how? The act answers, in the line of his duty. Does this mean a wound in battle, and does it mean such wound only? The act does not say so, unless he can be considered in the line of his duty only while he is engaged in battle. But fhe line of Ms duty is much more extensive and diversified. It extends to all the operations of the ship, whether civil or military ; and takes in the whole of her navigation during the entire cruise. The officer who is killed, or dies by reason of a wound received by the falling of a spar in a tempest, is as entirely within the description of being killed, or dying by reason of a wound received in the line of his duty, as the officer who is killed or dies by a wound in battle. But the punctua- tion is, in my opinion, erroneous, and throws a false construction upon the act. It should, I think, be thus : " If any officer of the navy or marines shall be killed, or die by reason of a wound received, in the line of his duty," &c. — that is, if any officer shall, 1st, be killed in the line of his duty ; or, 2d, die by reason of a wound received in the line of his duty — so as to embrace the case of all officers who are killed in the line of their duty, whether killed in bat- tle or in storm, by wounds or drowning, or any other cause growing out of their duty, and inflicting death. Now, according to this con- struction, the widows and children of all officers who have perished by either of the causes set forth in the above three questions^ would be entitled to the provisions prescribed by that act, because those questions do, one and all, put the case of persons killed in the line of their duty ; unless it can be said, with truth, that a man who is drowned is not killed. If this act were to be considered in itself, and it were important, fOr the benefit of the widows and children of the officers of the navy, to insist upon this construction which I have in- dicated, I should have no hesitation in doing so ; more especially when it is considered that the humane and liberal policy in which these acts originated justifies and demands a liberal interpretation of them. The next act upon the subject is that of March 4, 1814, " giving pensions to the widows and orphans of persons slain in the public. and private armed vessels- of the United States." The first section relates to private armed vessels, and embraces the case of officers, seamen, and marines, who shall die, or shall have died, since the 18th day of June, 1812. The second section, which alone relates to the navy, or public armed ships, is curiously constructed, and is in these words : " That if any seaman or marine belonging to the navy of the United States shall die ; or, if any officer, seaman, or marine, shall have died since the 18th day of June, 1812, by reason of a wound received in the. line of his duty, leaving a widow," ka. So that this act makes no provision for the case of officers who should PRINCIPLES AND DECISIONS. 163 he slain thereafter: the whole provision /or tU future being confined to the case of seamen and marines ; while, with regard to the past, (back to the 18th day of June, 1812,) it provides for the case of officers, seamen, and marines, who had been slain in the -public vessels of the United States, (according to the language of the title,) or who had died by reason of wounds received in the line of their duty. With regard to seamen and marines, this is the first act which provides for their widows and children ; and the provision is clearly confined to the widows and children of such as had been, or should be, slain in the public armed vessels of the United States ; or, according to the language of the enactment, such as had died, or should die, by reason of wounds received in the line of their duty ; — language too pre- cisely fixed by usage to embrace the cases put in the questions, of persons who had been drowned. By this law, therefore, no provision is made for the widows and children of seamen and marines who had been, or should be, drowned in the line of their duty. With regard to officers, I do not consider this act as altering their condition under the act of January 20, 1813, except so far as it looks back before that act, up to June 18, 1812. For the act of January 20, 1813, was entirely prospective, and consequently made no provision for the case of officers who had been killed theretofore since the day of the declaration of war, (June 18, 1812.) This omission is supplied by the act of March 4, 1814, so far as relates to officers who had died in that interval of wounds received in the line of their duty, but does not embrace thc/Case of those who had been drowned in that interval. But after January 20, 1813, the act of that date took eifect in behalf of the widows and children of officers who had either been killed in the line of their duty, or had died of wounds received in the line of their duty. This act is not repealed by the act of March 4, 1814, either expressly or impliedly ; for there is no express repeal, and no incompatibility between the provisions of the two acts — the act of March 4, 1814, only repealing one of the provisions of the act of January 20, 1813, leaving the other cases provided for by that act untouched ; and the act of March 4, 1814, dealing only with the past cases of officers, and making no provision for future cases, but leaving the future to stand solely upon the provisions of the act of January 20, 1813. But whatever doubt may have existed as to the construction of the antecedent acts, seems to have been removed by the act of March 3, 1817, passed for the express purpose of amend- ing and explaining the act of March 4, 1814, as its title declares ; and produced, no doubt, by the case of the Epervier, — the recent knowledge of whose loss had awakened a strong feeling of sympathy in the community, as is evinced by the act of the same date, for the temporary relief of the widows and children of those who had been lost in that vessel. The act now under consideration provides that if any officer, sea- man, or marine, belonging to the navy of the United States, shall die, or shall have died, since the 18th day of June, 1812, in conse- quence of disease contracted, or of casualties or injuries received, while in tlie line of his duty, and which shall be satisfactorily proved 164 NAVY AND MARINE WIDOWS' PENSION ACTS. to the Commissioners of the Navy Pension Fund, leaving a widow, &c. The cases put in the three questions appear to me to be clearly and completely covered by this law, so far as officers, seamen, or marines, belonging to the navy of the United States, are concerned ; for those are all cases of persons who had died while in the line of their duty, and who had died in consequence of casualty which had occurred while in the line of their duty. If any doubt could fairly arise as to the intention of the Legisla- ture in the use of language so broad and general as this, it would seem to be removed by subsequent laws, where a different phraseology is adopted to express the understanding of Congress as to the effect of this law, and to continue this effect. Thus, the act of March 3, 1819, is entitled "An act extending the term of half pensions to the widows and children of certain officers, seamen, and marines, who died in the public service." And the first section provides, that "in all cases where provision has been made by law for five years' half pay to the widows and children of officers who were killed in battle, or died of wounds received in battle, or who had died in the naval service of the United States during the late war, the said provisions shall be continued," &c. So, also, the act of January 22, 1824, is entitled "An act further extending the term of half pay pensions to the widows and children of officers, seamen, and marines, who died in the public service." And the first section provides, " that in all cases where provision has been made by law for five years' half pay to' the widows and children of officers, seamen, and marines, who were killed in battle, or ivho died in the naval service of the United States during the late war," &c. This general language — "ipAo died in the public service" and "w)Ao died in the naval service of the United States " — more espe- cially when taken in connexion with the other classification contained in the act of March 3, 1819, can have no application to any antece- dent act, except that of March 3, 1817, and may well be considered as a legislative exposition of that act : in which light it seems to me to place beyond controversy death from any species of casualty occur- ring in the line of their duty ; and thus to present an affirmative answer to all three questions submitted for my opinion. These questions are confined to the period between the 18th June, 1812, and the 22d January, 1824, the date of the last mentioned act ; which whole period is filled up by the operation of the act of 3d March, 1817 : that act operating retrospectively as well as prospec- tively. And although it is repealed by the 2d section of the a#t of 22d January, 1824, yet there is a saving of all pensions granted, and all rights which had accrued under it. [Opinion Attorney-General, March 31, 1835.] Acts of January 20, 1813; March 4, 1814; March 3, 1817; March 3, 1819 ; January 22, 18S4; and May 23, 1828. The act of January 20, 1813, is the first which makes provision for the widows and children of officers, seamen, or marines ; and it provides for the widows and children of officers of the navy or ma- PRINCIPLES AND DECISIONS. 165 nnes who shall he hilled or die hy reason of wounds received in the line of their duty. This law, though passed during the war, takes no notice of the fact. It is not limited to the war. It does not look back to the beginning of the war. It is solely prospective, and it is permanent ; but it is limited to the widows and children of officers. The act of March 4, 1814, in its 2d section, cures the omissions of the act of 1813, and extends the benefit of the pension fund to the widows and children of seamen and marines who shall die, and to those of any officer, seaman, or marine, who shall have died since the 18th June, 1812, by reason of any wound received in the line of his duty. The objects of the law were manifestly to place the widows of seamen and marines, prospectively, on the same ground on which the act of 1813 had placed the officers alone ; and its fur- ther object was to give the whole body all the retrospective benefits of the same provision, back to June 18, 1812, the day of the date of the declaration of the late war. The law is thus retrospective to June 18, 1812 ; but, prospectively, it is permanent. It is not, there- fore, limited to those who shall be killed or die of wounds during the war. It takes no notice of the war, further than to carry back the provisions to June 18, 1812 ; the reason of which date we are to learn from another law, which shows us that the war was declared on that day. The laws of 1813 and 1814, then, making properly one law, and presenting a system of pensions commencing June 18, 1812, are prospective and permanent from that day. But it is proper to ob- ■ serve, distinctly, on this law of 1813-'14, (considering them, as they ought to be considered, as one law,) — 1. That it is not confined to cases of persons killed in battle, or dying of wounds received in battle, but that its provisions extend to the representatives of all who shall die, or shall have died, by reason of a wound received in the line of their duty. Thus, a death in- flicted by the falling of a mast in a storm would bring the case as clearly within the laws as a death inflicted by battle. 2. That it is not confined to persons killed or dying of wounds during the late war, or during any future war. The 18th of June, 1812, is referred to, only for the purpose of fixing the commencement of the act. But that point given, the law applies equally to all per- sons killed or dying of wounds received in the line of their duty, whether in peace or in war, through all futurity, so long as the act shall be suffered to stand as a permanent one. The practical construction given by the commissioners of the navy fund to these laws was, I believe, that which their language most obviously imports, to wit : that the pensions were confined to the widows and children of those who had been killed, or who had died of wounds received in the Une of their duty. But Congress seems to . ive thought that there were other persons equally entitled to the benefit of that fund ; and hence the law of March 3, 1817. This law accordingly extends the benefit of that fund to the widows and children of officers, seamen, and marines, who shall die, or who 166 NAVY AND MARINE WIDOWS PENSION ACTS. shall have died since June 18, 1812, in consequence of diseases coti- trOeted, or of casualties or injuries received while in the line of theit duty. This law, like that of March 4, 1814, looks tack to the be- ginning of the war : and like that, too, it looks forward, not to the end of the war, but permanently. We have now two classes of pensioners, placed predisely oft the same footing : 1. The representatives of those who have been killed, or who have died of wounds received in the line of their duty, tinder the act of 1813-'14. 2. The representatives of those who had died in consequence of disease contracted, or of casualties or injuries received in the line of their duty., hy the act of 1817. Both classes standing upon the satne date — June 18, 1812; both" classes standing on the same permanent provisions ; both classes standing on the same rate of pensions — ^to wit, the half pay for five years. Nfext in order came the act of March 3, 1819, which demands pair- ticular attention ; for, on the correct construction of this act depends, I think, the answer to the question we are considering. The words of the act are these : " That in all cases where provi- sion has been made by law for five years' half pay to the widows and children of officers, seamen, and marines, who Were killed in battle, or died of wounds received in battle, or who died in the navcCl service of the United States during the late war, the said provision shall be continued for the additional term of five years, to commence at the end of the first term of five years in each case respectively, making the provision equal to ten years' half pay." The question is, whether it was the intentron of this law to con- tinue the benefit of the pension fund to both the elasses above men- tioned, or to the class only who had been provided for by the law of 1813-'14? To me, it is very apparent that it was to continue as to both. For if the intention was to limit it to those who were hilled in battle, or had died of wounds received in battle, (the class provided for by the acts of 1818-'14,) why are the words added, " or who died in the naval service of the United States?" These emphatic words become senseless, unless they are understood as pointing to a class distinct from that which had been previously mentioned ; and there was no other class to which they could possibly point, but that created by the law of 1817. To be sure, the description is not so expanded as it is in the act of 1817, by the addition of the wor^s, "of disease contracted, or of casualties or injuries received, while in the line of their duty." Nor was this at all necessary to manifest the intention of Congress ; because the first description, of " those who had been killed in battle, or had died in consequence of wounds received in battle," clearly contemplated the class provided for by the act of 1818-'14. The turning to another and distinct class, who had also been provided for — to wit, those who had neither been killed in battle, nor had died in consequence of wounds received in battle, hut who PRINCIPLES AND BECISIONS. liS^ had nevertheless died in the naval service of the United States, indi- cated necessarily the «lass which had heen provided for by the act of 1817 ; there being no other elass which had been provided for. With regard to the words, during the late war, they prove nothihg, ■with reference to the first point, either way; for the opei^ation o'f the law of 1813-'14 was not more limited to the late wair than the act of 1817. In this respect, as has been shown, the laws were exactly upon the same footing, having precisely the same commencement — June 18, 1812 ; and the same duration^ being bdth of them perma- nent. These words, therefore, are jast as ineffectaal to 8h6\V the intention of Congress to he limited to the one law as the other. As a descriptive circumstance of an existing law, they are just as appli- cable to the one law as to the other. In truth, they are not applica- ble to either as a descriptive circumstance of an existing law ; for neither law had linrited the benefit of its provisions to the representa- tives of those who bad either heen killed or had died during the late war. The argument which woiM rest upon tliese Words to show that the act of 1819 meant to continue only the provision which had been made for the benefit of those who had been killed or had died of wounds received during the late war, must show that there was suck a provision, to which ahne these words could apply. But we have seen that there was no such provision; but, on the contrary, the provision alluded to extended not only over the war, but over the peace which followed it, and over all futurity, till it should be re- pealed. And as to the act erf 18i3-'14 covering the period of the war, so also does the act of 1817^ In short, I cannot surmount the circumstance of a second class being distinctly introduced in the act of 181^., after the class covered by the act of 1813-'14 had been already provided for. The words which introduce that second class are presented too emphaticaHy, and are too important in themselves, to be rejected as surplusage. It is against one of the best established rules of construction of statutes to consider as inoperative words which are manifestly intended to have an operation, and which have a sensible subject on which they can operate. The rule is, ttat every word shall take effect if it can ; and here these words take effect. There was a elass of persons on whom they could operate — a class for which Congress had a,lready shown so much regard as to place them on the same footing with the first class under the act of 1813-14. Not only was ihere a cl^s on whom these words could operate, but it was the only class in whose favor they could operate ; the first class having been already covered by the previous part of the section, and there remaining no other class to which these words could have any possible application, but the class described in the act of 1817. I find myself eonstrained, therefore, to concur in the opinion which I see expressed m the margin of the act of March '3, 1817, as printed in the 6th volume of the Laws of the United States, that the act " was extended b|y the act of 1819," But I do not think that the act of 1819 gives the additional five years to the whole either of the first or second class. 168 NAVY AND MARINE WIDOWS' PENSION ACTS. With regard to the first class : the act of 1813-14, according tO" my construction of it, provides 'for all who had been killed or died of ■wounds received in the, line of their duty, whether in battle or not in battle — whether in peace or war. But the act of 1819, in its operation on this class, gives the addi- tional five years to those only who had been killed in battle, or had died of wounds received in battle ; and that, too, during the war. So in regard to the second class created by the act of 1817 : thait act provided for all who had died or should die of disease contracted, or casualties or injuries received while in the line of their duty, from June 18, 1812, through all futurity, till this act should be repealed. But the act of 1819, in its operation on this class, gives the addi- tional five years to those only who had died in the naval service during the late war. Thus, while it continues partially the provisions which had been made for both classes, this act of 1819 places limits on both, and confines the additional five years to portions only of each general class, in the manner which has been stated. My reading of the act of 1819 is, that it gives the additional five years — ft 1. To the widows and children of such of the officers, seamen, and marines, provided for by the act of 1813-'14, as had been killed in battle, or had died of wounds received in battle, during the late war. 2. To the widows and children of such of the officers, seamen, and marines, provided for by the act of 1817, as had died in the naval service during the late war, in consequence of disease contracted, or of casualties or injuries received, while in the line of their duty. Thus the broad construction which the acts of 1813-'14 and 1817 present upon their faces, and which they must have received, and still must receive (except so far as repealed) on an original applica- tion for a- pension under them, becomes narrowed by the operation of the act of 1819, so far as the additional five years is concerned, and no farther. Such is my construction of the act of 1819. The next act in order is that of January 22, 1824. This act is composed of two sections. The first is this : Be it enacted, &c.. That in all cases where provision has been made by law for five years' half pay to the widows and children of officers, seamen, and marines, who were Mlled in battle, or who died in the naval service of the United States, during the late war; and also in all cases where provision has been made for extending the term of five years, in addition to the first term of five years, the said provi- sion shall be further extended for an additional term of five years, to commence at the end of the second term of five years, in each case, retrospectively, making the provision equal to fifteen years' half pay." It IS observable that the same recognition of the two classes of pensioners on which I have already remarked, under the act of 1819, IS here still kept up, and five years of additional pension is added to both. It is further observable that the first class is here again, in the first PRINCIPLES AND DECISIONS. 169 instance, narrowed. According to the act of 1819, a person dying after the late war, of a wound received in battle during the war, would tjave clearly presented a case within the act. Is 'it so under the act of 1824 ? The words of the act of 1819 are, "who were killed in battle, or died of wounds received in battle, or who died in the naval service of the United States during the late war." These words, "during the late war," I understand as applicable to both classes; and they are to be used as belonging equally to both classes. Then the first class, as described by the act of 1819, is this : " Those who were killed in battle, or died of wounds received in battle, during. the late war." "While, under the act of 1824, the first class is described thus : " Those who were killed in battle during the late war," omitting those who died after the war, of wounds received in battle during the war. Whether this omission was designed or not — whether it could have been supplied by construction — or what would have been the eSect of this description, had it stood alone — it is needless to inquire ; because the acf of 1824, after thus describing the classes, cures all omissions by adding, "And also in all cases where provision has been made for extending the term of five years, in addition to the term of five years." This is an adoption of all who have been provided for by the act of 1819 ; and five years additional were now given by the act of 1824, to all who were embraced by the act of 1819. So that, if I am right in my construction of the act of 1819, that portion of the second class who died in the naval service during the late war, in consequence of disease contracted, or casualties or injuries received, while in the line of their duty, are again provided for by the act of 1824, and another five years is given them. Such is my construction of the first section of the act of 1824. The second section of that act repeals the act of March 3, 1817. What is the effect of this repeal ? Simply to destroy its original character as a prospective permanent law, from the day of the repeal. Up to the day of its repeal, it was an existing law, and in its charac- ter permanent. Up to that time it covered all deaths from the causes it enumerates, from June 18, 1812. The rights which it gave through that whole period were vested rights ; and were not divested, nor proposed to be divested, by the repeal of the law. I hold, therefore, that in all cases where officers, seamen, or marines, have died in the naval service of the United States, between June 18, 1812, and June 22, 1824, in consequence of disease con- tracted, or disabilities or injuries received in the line of their duty, the widow and children of such deceased are entitled to the five years' pension given by the act of March 3, 1817. From January 22, 1824 (the date of the repeal), no death from these causes could give the widow ind children any such right. But this was the whole eff'ect of the repeal ; it left the rights already vested under the act of 1817, in full force ; and it does not profess to repeal the act of 18l9, which had already taken up and provided for a portion of these pensioners (the representatives of those who have died in the naval service during 170 NAVY AND MARINE WIDO-WS' PENSION ACTS. *fe late war) ; nor to impugn tke first section of this act ■(1824), which had already continued the provisions of the act of 1819. So that, if 1 am right in tny constr'uction of the act of 1819, that it covered this portion of these pensioners ; and of the first section of the act of 1824, that it contStiued this cover — the repeal of the aot of 1817 leaves them untouched; because their new rights for the additional five years did not depend on that act (1817) at all, Isut solely on the acts of 1819 and 1824. We come now, lastly, to the act in (question ^ — that of May 2S, 1828 ; the first section of whicli is word lor word with the first section of the act of 1^24, mutatis mutandis. So that my construction of tie first section of the act of 1824 is my constraction of tte first section of the act of 1828. And the soundness of the -whole opinioa depends on the construction of tlie act of 1S19, which I consider the hinge of the controversy. The 'first section of the act of 1828 4oes hot extend all j>rovisio'ns given by the law of 1814, but ■S'ach part of them only as, undef the operation of tha;t act, had been assigned or belonged to the widoiSr and children of those ofiicers, searmeta, and marines, who had been killed in battle, or who had died of *ou»ds received in battle during the late war. And so far, and so far only, as the awt of 1817 operated to give pensions to the widows and children of officers, seamen, and marines, who died in the naval service chcrinff the late war, in conse^ztinee of disease contracted, and casualties and injuries received in the iin& of their duty, these provisions have *been regulai-ly and Buccessiveiy continued by the acts of 1819, 1824, aiad 1828 -; and are, conse- quently, so far embraced by the first section of the last mentioned act. [Opinion of Attomey--Geijepal, July 22, 1828.!] Acts of 1813, 1814, 1817, 1819. The act of 1813 provides that a pension shall be allowed to the widow, and, if there be nowidow,tothe child or children (being under sixteen years of age) of any twicer of the navy or marines, who shall be killed, or die by reason of a wound received in tJee line of his duty. This act, it will be oljserved, is confined to tJhe -widows and children of officers ; a;nd simply requires tliat t-he death, or -wound from which death Las ensued, shall have been received by such officer " in the line of his duty." The act of 1814 extends the provision -prospectively "to the -frido-ws and children of "seamen" and "marines;" and then, including officers, provides retroactively 'iov all deaths which may have oecuTred since the 18f A June, 1812, 'the date of tihe declaration of war against Great Britain ; using the same words to describe the nature of the death which shall entitle to pension — that is to say, that it shall have been occasioned by a -wound received in the -line of duty — as are used in the act of 1813 ; and, like that act, not requiring that the death shall occur prospectively, within any specified time. It is the purpose of the act of 1817, which is amendatory of the PRINGIPLES JL-NJ) decisions. 171 preceding act, to give to this' provision a still greater extension ; and, accordingly, in relation to the same class of persons, provides for deaths which shall occur, or shall have occurred since the 18th June, 1812, ''in consequence of 'disease contracted,' or of 'casualties,' or ^injuries received,' -while in the line of duty." The former acts pro- vided only for cases of death in consequence of wounds ; while this extends the provision to cases where death has ensued from " disease contracted," or '> casualties or injuries received." In neither of the acts is there any prospective limitation of the time when the death must occur to entitle the widow or children to the benefit of the pension. These three acts, it will have been seen, provide, permanently, for the allowance of a pension to the widow, or child or children under sixteen years of age (if there be no widow), of every officer, seamen, or marine, of the navy of the United States, who has died since the 18th June, 1812, or who shall die after the date of the acts, in consequence of wounds, diseases, casualties, or injuries, received or incurred in the line of his duty ; that is, as I understand it, who shall come, or who shall have come to his death, since the prescribed period, in whatever manner, and either presently or remotely, in the discharge of his duty. Prospectively, the provision is unlimited. Retrospectively, it is restrained to the 18th June, 1812. These are the several acts which relate to the original grant of pensions. Those which follow provide for the renewal of them. We are now prepared to examine the act of 1819, to which your inquiry relates, and concerning which you ask, in substance — Whether-, to entitle a widow, or child, to the renewal of a pension under that act, it is necessary that the officer, seaman, or marine, through whom it is claimed, should have been wounded during the war, and should also have died during the ivar ? The act under consideration provides, " that in all cases where provision has beea made by law for five years' half pay to the widows and children of officers, seamen, and marines, who were killed in battle, or died of wounds received in battle, or who died in the naval service of the United States, during the late war, the said provision shall be continued," &c. If I were required to interpret this act strictly, with a view to narrow, as much as its terms would permit, the bounty which it pro- vides ; — if I were obliged (overlooking what I conceive to be the spirit and intention of the act, to found my answer on its letter), and to construe that most strongly against the grantee, — I should per- haps be constrained to acquiesce in the opinion given by my prede- cessor to yours, on the 22d July, 1828, which is before you. But, after a very carefuT and anxious consideration of the subject, I cannot divest myself of the conviction that such was not the intention of Congress, and that the words of the act are fairly susceptible of a different interpretation. I do not propose to trouble you with an elaborate argument on this question, but will content myself with such an exposition of my views as may suffice to render them intelligihle. 172 NAVY AND MARINE WIDOWS' PENSION ACTS. In framing the act of 1819, Congress had it in view to provide for an extension of the bounty which had been therefore granted to the widows or children of certain persons who had " died in the public service." This intention is expressed in the title of the act, which, although it cannot be used to extend the provisions of the enacting clauses, ought not to be wholly disregarded in searching for the in- tention of the law-makers. The mode resorted to, to carry this intention into effect, was by an enactment which should, in terms, extend the provisions of the former pension, laws. Congress, in the act of 1819, have not enacted substantively that the widows, &c., of officers, &c., who were killed in battle, or who died of wounds received in battle, or who died in the naval service of the United States during the late war, shall receive five years' additional pension. But, referring to the former laws, they have declared that, where provision has been made by law for persons of that description, their pensions shall be renewed. To give effect, then, to the act of 1819, it is obviously necessary that there should be some pre-existing laws which make such provision as it specifies. If one construction of its terms shall be found to corre- spond with pre-existing laws, and another not to do so ; — ^if, according to one interpretation, the provision to which it refers has in fact been made by law, while another supposes a reference, to which no an- swering provision can be found to have been made by law — the former is, without doubt, to be adopted, in order to give effect to the act. With this idea in view, let us proceed in our examination. The persons to whom this bounty had been granted before 1819 were the widows or children — 1st. Of officers, seamen, or marines, who, since the 18th June, 1812, had been killed in battle. * 2d. Of the same classes, who, since the same period, had died by reason of a wound received in the line of their dufy. 3d. Of the same classes, who, since the same period, had died in consequence of diseases contracted, or of casualties or injuries re- ceived, while in the line of their duty. These provisions had been made by the several acts of 1813, 1814, and 1817 ; and it is observable, that the widows or children of these several classes of persons were entitled to the pensions provide^ for by the acts above referred to, without regard to the time when the death occurred, except that it must have happened after the 18th June, 1812. These were the only acts which Congress can be supposed to have had in contemplation in framing the act of 181il; and the pensions which they granted were so granted, without reference to the fact whether the death had occurred in war or in peace. No such dis- tinction was recognised by pre-existing laws. No act had made pro- vision for five years' half pay to the widows and children of officers, seamen, and marines, who had been killed during the war, or who had died during the war, of wounds received in battle, or who had died in the naval service of the United States during the war. It PRINCIPLES AND DECISIONS. 173 was not possible, in reading those acts, to affix such limitations to either of them. It was true, indeed, that the widows or children of persons killed during the war, or dying during the war, of wounds received in battle, or who had died in the naval service of the United States, during the war, had been placed on the pension list, and were in the receipt of the five years' half pay ; but this was under the more general provisions of these acts, which were equally applicable to them and to others — to those who had died in war, as well as to those who had died in peace ; and they were not so placed on the pension list because these events had occurred during the war, but because they had occurred after the l%th June, 1812. If, then, it had been the intention of Congress, in the act of 1819, to limit the renewal of pensions to cases where the death had occurred during the war, it seems to me that they would have done this by a distinct and substantive enactment to that effect — not by a reference to the provisions of former laws ; and for the obvious reason, that no act containing such restrictive provisions as this construction ascribes to the act of 1819 was to be found. I think, moreover, that the words of the act of 1819 are fairly susceptible of a different interpretation from that which excludes all persons except those who died during the war. These words are "where provision has been made hy law for the widows," &c., "of officers," &c., '■'■who were hilled in battle, or died of wounds received in battle," or "who died in the naval service of the United States during the late war." These latter words ("during the late war") are words of limitation — of restriction. Now, I think it may be well questioned whether their operation ought not to be confined to the last member of the sentence — whether it was intended that they should do anything more than to qualify the grant to the third class of per- sons enumerated, namely, those who had died in the naval service of the United States. Then the classification would' stand thus: ^To the widows or children — 1. Of those who had been killed in battle. 2. Of those vi'ho had died of wounds received in battle. 3. Of those who had died in the naval service of the United States during the late "War. In support of this suggestion, I would remark — 1st. That it was obviously unnecessary to apply this restriction to the first class. The wound and the death were cotemporaneous in such cases. 2d. That no sufficient motive can be assigned for an intention, on the part of Congress, to apply it to the second. They meant to provide for the widows and children of those who died of wounds received in fighting the battles of their country ; and whether the death was instanta- neous, or occurred after an interval, if it c6uld bo certainly traced to the wound, the motive in either case would be the same. 3d. We may readily understand why the restriction was applied to the third class. That class includes deaths from every other cause, except wounds received in battle. To excite the crew of a national ship to deeds of heroism in time of war. Congress might be willing to allow a pension to the widow, &c., of a seaman who fell from the mast- 174 NAVY AND MARINE WIDOWS' PENSION ACTS. head and was killed; and yet not think proper to extend the saipe bounty, in a case of similar casualty, occurring in time of peace. It wouldj then, be useless to apply these restrictive words to the first class. It would be improper to extend them to the second; but a very sufficient motive is found for their application to the third. It is fair to presume that Congress was actuated by a corresponding intention. But let us suppose these words of restriction applicable to each of the three classes. of cases specified, and not exclusively to the last ; — the inquiry is, do they relate to the time of the death, or to the time when the cause occurred which occasioned it ? Apply the inquiry to the second class, to which your question more particularly refers— to those who died of wounds received in battle — and consider them as restricting the cases of that class to which*the renewal should extend. In this case, they must be read in immediate connexion with the words which they are supposed to limit. Put these restrictive words, then, in juxtaposition with the descriptive words which relate to that class, and you will have the following collocation : " Who died [of wounds received in battle] during the late war?" Here is a sentence which consists of three members: .t^e first, "who diedj" relates to the death, the primary motive to the allowance of the pension : the second specifies the cause of that death, in the words " of wounds received in battle;" the third defines the time cf their being received — "during the late war." It may, perhaps, be said that these last words relate to the time of the death, and not to that of receiving the wound; because the term " battle" supposes a state of war, and that a wound received in battle must have been received during the war. If this be conceded, I think it may be satisfactorily answered that sufficient effect may be given to the words "in battle," without ascribing to them this forced operation. A man may have received a wound during the late war which occasioned his death, and yet- have furnished no meritorious claim to his widow or children to the allow- ance of a pension. His wound may have been received in a mutiny, from the hand of an assassin, or in private combat. To exclude such cases, the expression "in battle" is used ; and the efiect is to confine it to wounds received in fighting the enemies of hi^ country. Jx is still open, then, to us to inquire what is the fair interpretation of this sentence ? Do the restrictive words apply to the fii'st or last member of it ? to persons who died during the last war, or to those who died — no matter when — of wounds received in battle during the last war? In fair grammatical construction, the last member of the sentence is the immediate antecedent, and the operation of the restrictive words cannot go beyond it. Test this by an example. If the opinion of the physicians who were consulted was correct, the late Major-General Brown ultimately fell a victim to the wounds which he received on the Niagara frontier. Admitting this to be true, may it not be said of General Brown that he " died of wounds received in battle during the late war ?" and would any one understand the speaker to intend thereby to assert that he ^"^ died during the late war?" I think not; and yet these PRINCIPLES AND DECISIONS. 175 are the identical words of the act to which that construction has been given. If we look to the intention of Congress — to the motive which would probahly influence them in granting the renewal of a pension — this construction is confirmed. What conceivable difference can it make: in the justice of the claim to a pension, whether the officer, &c., dies at the instant of receiving his wound, or languishes until the end of the war, and then breathes his last? What conceivable difference is. there between the two cases, as relates to the wants of his loidow and children ? It is. the heroism which impels him to the conflict which you would reward in the person of his widow or chil- dren ; and theij are equally objects of your bounty in either case. I think, then, that the widow or children of an officer, seaman, or marine, who has died since the late war, of a wound received in battle during the war,, is, or are entitled to a renewal of his, her, or their pension, under the act of 1819 ; and I found this opinion upon the following considerations : — 1. That, unless this interpretation be given to that act, there are no such pre-existing laws as those to which its provisions could be made to refer. 2. That this interpretation is sanctioned by the rules of gramma- tical construction applicable to the sentence on which the question arises ; and that such a sentence would be similai'ly understood in common parlance. 3. The interpretation thus deduced from the reference of the act of 1819 to pre-existing laws, and from the grammatical construction and familiar use of the sentence, is confirmed by a consideration of the motives which may reasonably be presumed to have influenced Congress in passing the act. [Opinion of Attorney-General, September 6, 1830.'] Acts of 1813, 1814, 1817, 1819, 1824, 1828, 1832, and 1834. In your letter of the 10th of February last, you state that on the 18th of May, 1815, Benjamin White, master-at-arms in the navy of the United States, died in consequence of a fall through the hatch- way'of the United States' ship Ontario, leaving a widow, who now for the first time claims a pension. I infer from your letter, (though the facts are not distinctly stated,) that Mr. White was killed in the line of his duty, and also that Mrs. White has not been married since her husband's death. After referring me to various acts of Congress applicable to the subject, you request me to inform you "whether, in my opinion, the benefits of theSe laws ought to be now extended to Mi;^. White ; and if not, whether she is entitled to any pension ; and if entitled, at what time the pension should commence, and for what period should it be allowed?" The acts of Congress in relation to navy pensions are so numerous and intricate, that I have found it a task of no little labor and diffi- culty to extract from them a satisfactory reply to your queries; 176 NAVY AND 5IAEI.VE WIDOWS" PENSION ACTS. especially as I find, on a careful examination of the records of this office, that many of their provisions have, from time to time, been referred to this office for construction, and that, on several of these occasions, the decision appears to have been founded rather on the usage of your Department than on the language of the Legislature. To secure uniformity of judgment, and conform, as far as I can, to the practice which has heretofore obtained in analogous cases, I shall take up the case of Mrs. White at the date of. her husband's death, and, by the aid of the decisions made by my predecessors, endeavor to dispose of it in accordance with the principle of those decisions. On the 18th of May, 1815, the only laws applicable to the subject were the acts of February 13, 1813, and of March 4, 1814. According to the construction given to the act of 1813 by the Attorney-Q-eneral, in his opinion of March 31, 1825, it embraces every case of an officer killed in the line of his duty, whether killed in battle or by casualties ; and the case of Benjamin White Was therefore within it, provided he is to be considered as an officer — for the act does not extend to"^ seamen. I am by no means certain that a master-at-arms is an officer of the navy, within the meaning of the act of January 20, 1813. In the acts of Congress then in force, he was called and treated as a petty officer, as contradistifi- guished from seamen. I am, therefore, inclined to think he was an officer within the act of 1813, and that his widow was, accordingly, entitled to the benefits of that law; but, as this is a question which belongs rather to the naval service than to this office, I shall not express a positive opinion thereon. If the act of February, 1813, did not embrace this case, then Mrs. White, at the time of her hnsband'.s death, was not entitled to any pension ; because the act of March 4, 1814, as expounded in the above-cited opinion, was confined to persons sZam by wounds ; and so far as officers are concerned, its provisions were entirely retro- spective — covering those (Jases, and those only, in which officers had been slain in the line of their duty, between July 18, 1812, and the date of the law. According to the construction thus given to these two acts, White, if an officer, was embraced in the act of 1813, and not in that of 1814 ; but, if not an officer, he was not embraced in either ; not in the act of 1813, because that act is confined to officers; and not in that of 1814, because that is confined to persons slain, and did not extend to deaths by casualties. But it is to be observed, that the act of March 4, 1814, was sub- sequently extended,, by the amendatory act of March 3, 1817, so as to include officers, as well as seamen, in all cases, and so also as to include deaths by disease and casualties ; and that, under this amen- datory act, Mrs. White would have been entitled to a pension, whether her husband be considered as an officer or a seaman. It is true that the amendatory act of 1817 was repealed by the act of January 22, 1824, but with a saving of pensions already granted, and of all rights accrued under it. PRINCIPLES AND DECISIONS. 177 So much, then, may be considered as certain, viz. : that Mrs. White, provided her husband be regarded as an officer, was entitled, under the act of 1813, at her husband's death ; and if not an officer, then under the act of March 3, 1817, from the date of that act, to the ordinary pension of five years' half pay. Then comes the act of April 16, 1818, in addition to the act of March 4, 1814 ; but, as both sections of this law relate exclusively to persons who served in private armed ships, they have no bearing on the present case, and may be laid out of view. Next in order of time is the act of March 3, 1819, extending the term of half-pay pensions previously granted by law to the widows and children of certain officers, seamen, and marines, who had been killed or died in the naval service, /or an additional term of five years. But this act did not apply to Mrs. White's case, whether her right be regarded as commencing under the act of 1813, or under that of 1817 ; because it is expressly confined to the cases of persons killed or dying "during the late war;" and White was killed in May, 1815, after the termination of the war. The same remark must be made as to the act of January 22, 1824, " further extending the term of half-pay pensions," &c. ; the acts of April 9, 1824, or of May 26, 1824, (which are, moreover, confined to private armed ships ;) and the first section of the act of May 23, 1828, " extending the term of certain pensions chargeable on the Navy and Privateer Pension Funds." By the act of June 28, 1832, "further to extend the pensions heretofore granted to the widows of persons killed, or who have died, in the naval service," is not confined to cases which occurred during the war. It provides "that, in all cases where provision has been made by law for the five years' half pay to widows and children of officers, seamen, and marines, who were killed in battle, or who died in the naval service of the United States ; and, also, in all cases where provision has been made for extending the term of five years, in addition to any term of five years, the said provision shall be, and is hereby, further extended for an additional term of five years, so far as respects widows only ; to commence at the end of the current or last expired term of five years, in each case respectively." This latter act embraces the case of Mrs. White, and adds five years to the five years before allowed by act of 1813, if her husband was an officer ; and by that of 1817, if he be regarded as a seaman merejy : thus making the pension equal to ten years' half pay. The last act to be referred to is that of June 30, 1834, which pro- vides, among other things, that all the provisions and benefits of the act of June 28, 1832, " be continued for another term of five years to all those widows who have heretofore had the benefit of the same." Having thus collected and examined the various statutes by which, as I suppose, the case must be determined, I proceed to inquire whether the benefit of these laws, or any of them, ought now to be extended to Mrs. White. I find this question substantially answered by the opinions of my 12 178 KAVT AND MARINE WIDQ-WS' PENSION ACTS. predecessoFS. In an opinion dated June 9, 1825, and ^;ransmitted under that date to the Secretary of the Navy, the Attorney- General speaks of the rights acquired by the widow under the first section of the act of March 4, 1814. Here is a certain right which the law says shall accrue to the widow on the happening of a certain event — that of her husband having died by reason of a wound received in the litie of his duty on board of a private armed vessel. The law does not require either that an application shall be made by her, or that any thing else should be done in order to consummate her right. It is consummated by the mere fact of the death of her husband under the circumstances already mentioned. It is a vested right to so much money per annum, for five years — subject, however, to be discon- tinued and defeated by her death or rnarriage at any time within that term ; but a vested and perfect right during the time that she continued to live the widow of the deceased husband, and not defeated by her subsequent intermarriage, except from the time at which such intermarriage takes place. Such I understand to have been the uniform practice under this act, ever since its adoption ; and I confess that I see no reason for changing the practice. Although the foregoing observations were made in reference to a case arising under the first section of the act of 1814, (which section relates to private armed ships,) the prin- ciple laid down by the Attorney-General is equally applicable to other cases. He also says that the right of pension does not depend on the necessities of the parties. " It is given to the widows and children of ofScers and men, of rich and poor, without regard to thei? circum- stances. It is in the nature of an absolute engagement or promise made to those oiScers and men, that if they fall in the service of their country, so much shall be paid to their wives and children, without inquiry into the fact whether they stood in need of it or not. Nor is there any condition annexed to the promise, that the monfiy shall be paid if applied for in a given time, or in a given state of things. It is bottomed only on the single condition that the husband and father shall die in the service of his country ; on the happening of which condition, the public engagement becomes a debt, which is as much property, and the property of the widow and children, as any bond which the deceased may have left to them by his will." He therefore affirmed the validity of the practice which had ob- tained, as then stated- to him, in the Navy Department. In accordance with these views, I am therefore of opinion that Mrs. White is now entitled to receive the pension for five ^years, secured to her by the act of 1813, or by the act of 1817, as you may decide in respect to the class to' which her husband belonged- — (in the first, the five years will have ended May .18, 1820 ; in the latter, March 3, 1822 ;) — and also for the additional five years given by the act of 1832. In an opinion dated October 27, 1882, and transmitted to the Secretary of the Navy, the Attorney-General decided that the act of June 28, 1832, embraced in its provisions the widows of the differ- PRINCIPLES AND DECISIONS. 179 ent classes therein mentioned ; " and that the pension of the widow, in each case, is to commence at the end of the current or last expired term of Jive years." The five years added by this law will therefore have expired, in the one case, May 18, 1825 ; and, in the other, March 3, 1827. J ^ > , In regard to the law of June, 1834, my first impression was that it did not include Mrs. White's case ; because it seemed to me, on a cursory examination of the act, that "she had not therefore had the benefit" of the act of June 28, 1832. But, on further reflection, I am inclined to think that Congress, by those words, meant merely to require that the widow should be one who was embraced within the law of 1832, and therefore entitled to its benefits ; and who, in that sense, might be said to have " had the benefit of the same ;" and that they did not intend to make the actual receipt and enjoyment of the pension prior to June 30, 1834, a condition precedent to the operation of the act of that date. I am confirmed in this opinion by another point adopted and decided by the Attorney-General in the opinion of June 9, 1825, before referred to. He remarks, in refer- ence to the language of the acts of April 16, 1818, and April 9, 1824, extending pensions previously, granted, (the first of which ex- tending acts is confined to cases " where a person has been put on the pension list or granted a certificate of pension," under the former law; and the other of which is confined to the "pensions of persons teho now are in the receipt thereof") that he understands, "If a widow, whose rights commence under the act of 1814, now, for the first time, makes an application for her pension under all the past acts, no diiEculty arises as to her now receiving all that these acts give her, provided that she still remains the widow of the deceased. I understand, also, that even where she has since intermarried before she has made any application, or has died before she has made any application, the uniform practice of the Department has been not to consider the application too late for all that was due at the time of her intermarriage or death ; the Department having heretofore con- sidered that as having been done which ought to have been done. It is a liberal exposition of these acts, in advancement of the public policy on which they were founded ; and I see no sufficient cause to disturb it by recommending a change." The language of the act of 1834 is certainly not so strong as that used by either of the acts referred to ; and I have, therefore, the less hesitation in applying the principle of the above extract. This will add another term of five years, to commence from the passage of the act of 1834. The result, then, is, that according to the laws, usages, and deci- sions above stated, Mrs. White is entitled to a pension of ten years prior to the act of June 30, 1834 ; and, under the latter act, to a pension oifive, to commence from the day of the passage thereof. [Opinion of Attorney-General, April 5, 1836.] 180 NAYT AND MARINE WIDOWS' PENSION ACTS. Act of June 28, 1832. I think Mrs. McCormick is entitled to her pension during the time she remained the widow of Lieutenant Leary. If the act of June 28, 1832, stood alone, and was to be construed without reference to any of the preceding acts of Congress on the same subject, the expressions "so far as respects widows only," con- tained in this law, would leave it very doubtful whether its benefits were not to be confined to those who were widows at the time of its passage. But this act must be taken in connexion with the previous laws on the same subject. And T find, by the opinion of the Attorney- General of June 9, 1825, to which you have referred me, that, under the acts of Congress passed before that time, extending the periods for which the pension was allowed, widows who had married before the passage of the law, or before the application for the pension, had been uniformly held to be entitled up to the time of their marriage. As this opinion of the Attorney-General sanctioned the construction which had been given by the Government, the same practice has, I presume, since prevailed in the execution of those laws, the same interpretation being given to them. The act of 1832 appears to have contemplated nothing more than a further extension of the public bounty in favor of the widow, prolonging the period of the pension, upon the same principles and in the same cases in which it had been extended by the previous laws, so far as they were concerned, but refusing to extend it in behalf of the children. And the words " so far as respects widows only," are not, I think, intended to change the policy of the former acts of Congress, so far as concerns the widows, but to exclude the children, who, under the former laws, upon her marriage became entitled for the remainder of the time of extension. Acts of 1817, 1819, 1824, 1832, 1834. It appears, from- the papers accompanying your communication, that the applicant is the widow of sailingmaster William Stevenson, who died in service in 1818, hut not in consequence of disease con- tracted, or of injury received, while in the service ; and the question arises, whether, under these circumstances, the laws respecting the navy pension fund, now in force, entitle her to be placed on the pension list. By the act of the 3d of March, 1817 (Laws of the U. S., vol. 6, p. 2l2), pensions were granted for five years to the widows and chil- dren of any ofiicer, seaman, or marine, who shall die, or shall have died since the 18th day of June, 1812, " in consequence of disease contracted, or of casualties or injuries received, while in the line of his duty." It is obvious that Mrs. Stevenson was not entitled to the benefit of this act, because her husband did not die in conse- quence of disease contracted, or of casualties or injuries received '■'■while in the line of his duty." By the acts of the 8d of March, 1819 (vol. 6, p. 399), the 22d of June, 1824 (vol. 7, p. 213), and the 28th of June, 1832 (pamphlet ed., p. 32), some supplementary pro- PRINCIPLES AND DECISIONS. 181 visions have been made ; the effect of which, so far as the present question is concerned, was simply to continue the act of 1817, except that the second section of the act of 1832 extended to the widows of all those who may " have died by reason of wounds received during the war." This enlargement of the pension list did not, how- ever, include the case of Mrs. Stevenson, because her husband did not die by reason of any wound received during the war. The act of the 30th June, 1834 (pamphlet ed., p. 90), continues the benefit ot the act of 1832, for another term of five years, to those who had theretofore had the benefit thereof; and also extended the same "to the widows of officers, seamen, and marines, who have died in the naval service since the 1st day of January, 1824, or who may die in said service by reason of disease contracted, or of casualties by drown- ing or otherwise, or of injuries received while in the line of their duty." This last provision fails also to reach the case of the present claimant ; because her husband died before 1824, and not of an injury received Vfhile in the line of his duty. I am, therefore, of the opinion that the department is not authorized to afford her any relief. [Opinion of Attorney-General, October 17, 1834.] Act of June 15, 1844. {Vide acts in special cases.) Under the second section of this act, construed in connexion with that of June 30, 1834, when a widow dies after having received a portion of the pension, the children are entitled only to the remainder of the five years. [Opinion of Attomey.General, January 4, 1845.] Act of 1834. I have examined the papers in the case of Mrs. Sarah Heberd, and submit the following opinion for your consideration : — The applicant in this case claims a pension under the act of June, 1834, to commence from the date of the act. She is the widow of Andrew Heberd, late a chief engineer, who died on the 4th of August, 1847. The law authorizing the employment and regulating the pay of engineers was passed on the 31st August, 1842. The first section of the act provides " that the Secretary of the Navy shall appoint the requisite number of engineers and assistant engineers, not exceed- ing one chief engineer, two assistant, two second assistant, and three third assistant engineers, for each steam ship-of-war for the naval service of the United States." By the fourth section the Secretary is directed to appoint " a skilful and scientific engineer-in-chief, who shall receive for his services the sum of three thousand dollars per annum, and shall perform such duties as the Secretary of the Navy shall require of him touching that branch of the service." The seventh section of the naval appropriation act, approved March 3, 1845, provides " that, in lieu of the mode heretofore provided by law, the engineer-in-chief and chief engineers of the navy shall be appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate." It is worthy of special notice, in the outset, that the act to regulate 182 NAYY AND MARINE WIDOWS' PENSION ACTS. the appointment and pay of engineers, while it prescribes the neces- sary rules for the distribution of prize-money, is entirely silent in relation to the allowance of pensions. The same remark applies to firemen and coal-heavers authorized to be enlisted by the second section of the same act. The closing sentence of the fifth section, in my opinion, has no reference whatever to pensions. It. relates exclu- sively to the laws, rules, and regulations for the government of the naval service, to which engineers are made subject. The questions submitted are : Ist. Is an engineer's widow enti- tled to a pension ? 2d. If so, at what rate per month shall she be paid? The first question depends upon the construction to be given to the act of the 30th June, 1834, and the previous laws upon the same subject. The first section of the act of 1884 provides " that all the provisions and .benefits of the act of the twenty-eighth of June, one thousand eight hundred and thirty-two, 'entitled 'An act further to extend the pension heretofore granted to the widows of persons killed or who died in the naval service,' be continued for another term of five years to all those widows who have heretofore had the benefit of the same ; and the same are hereby extended to the widows of officers, seamen, and marines, who have died in the naval service since the first day of January, one thousand eight hundred and twenty-four, or who may die in said service by reason of disease contracted, or of casualties by drowning or otherwise, or of injuries received while in the line of their duty ; and the pensions of such widows shall com- mence from the passage of this act." The efiect of that provision was, first, to continue all the provisions and benefits of the act of 1832 for another term of five years to all those widows who have heretofore had the benefit of the same ; secondly, to extend those provisions and benefits to the widows of officers, seamen, and marines, who have died in the naval service since the 1st day of January, 1824 ; and, thirdly, to extend the same provisions and benefits to the widows of officers, seamen, and marines, who mai/ die in the naval service by reason of disease contracted, or of casualties by drowning or otherwise, or of injuries received while in the line of their duty. It is insisted that, by a liberal interpretation of the act, Mrs. Heberd's case may be included in the third class. To efiect this object, it is contended that the act should be regarded as prospective in a double aspect : that it applies to offices subsequently created in the naval service, as well as to subsequent appointments to offices previously authorized by law. No doubt the pension, being annexed to the office, inures as fully to the widows of officers subsequently appointed as to those whose husbands were in the service at the date of the act. It embraces not only the widows of those officers, sea- men, and marines, who have died in the naval service since the first day of January, 1824 ; but the widows of those who may die in said service, under the circumstances therein mentioned. It is clear. PRINCIPLES AND DECISIONS. 183 therefore, that it includes subsequent appointtnents to offices then recognised by law. Whether it can be extended to other employ- ments to offices then recognised by law — whether it can be extended to other employments in the naval service, unknown to the law at the passage of the act — must depend in a great degree upon the nature and character of thie previous acts, whose provisions and bene- fits were continued and extended by the act under consideration. The language of the act of 1834 is peculiar, and should be kept dis- tinctly in view. Whatever may be its effect, it is reasonable to pre- sume that it was based upon the offices in the navy as they existed at that time. It must be admitted that it does not, in terms, purport to include those not in existence. The legislation bf Congress, in relation to pensions, does not favor that conclusion. It has not been the habit of Congress to legislate upon this subject in advance. The pension acts, which are very numerous, haVe generally been limited in their operation to short periods, and carefully restricted to oases of urgent demand. The truth of this remark is strikingly exemplified by the act of 1832, to which I now invite y-our attention. The first section provides that in all cases where provision has been made by law for five years' half pay to widows and children of officers, sea- men, and marines, who were killed in battle, or who died in the naval service of the United States^ and in all cases where provision has been made for extending the term of five years, in addition to any term of five years, the said provision shall be, and is hereby, extended for an additional term of five years, so far as respects widows only, to commence at the end of the current or last expired term of five years, in each case respectively. Ail will admits I pre- sume, that the provisions of these two acts must be considered to- gether, in order to collect the true meaning of the act of 1834. It will be perceived that pensions under the law of 1832 were strictly limited to cases where provision had been previously made^ or the term extended, for the five years' half pay of widows. The act of 1834, in adopting that act as its basis, adopts the same limitations, which clearly restrict its operation to the offices in existence at the time of its passage. No . one will pretend that any provision was ever made for the widow^f engineers prior to that time. The phrase "in all cases where provision has been made" is twice repeated in the law of 1832, and cannot be regarded as insignificant or without meaning ; and unless it be so, it is impossible, it seems to me, to maintain the construction assumed by the claimant. The prospective words in the act of 1834 are fully satisfied without ex- tending their application to offices subsequently created. The words "may die" unquestionably refer to time to come; but they have reference in this case to the death of the husband, and not to the office which he filled. In other words, widows whose husbands may die after the passage of the act of 1834 are entitled to a pension, whether the husband was appointed before or after that time, pro- vided he filled an office in the navy which was in existence at the date of the act. In other cases, pensions cannot be allowed, unless 184 NAYT AND MARINE WIDOWS* PENSION ACTS. they are authorized by the act creating the office. The contrary rule would produce this absurdity — that, whenever a new office is created in the navy, silence on the part of Congress would be equiva- lent to the granting of a pension. No office could be created without this result, unless Congress saw fit to negative the inference by ex- press enactment? In my judgment, fto such interpretation of the act of 1834 should ever receive the sanction of the Department. These views will be much strengthened by Reference to the second section of the act of August 24, 1842, which provides that all pensions to officers and seamen in the naval service shall be regulated according to the pay of the navy as it existed on the first day of January, one thousand eight hundred and thirty-five. At that time, there was no corps of engineers attached to the navy ; and, of course, the pension in this case, if one were allowed, could not be adjusted in accordance with the requirements of that act. There being no other law upon the subject, the Department is left without any guide. It cannot bie admitted that Congress has authorized a pension without presenting some mode to ascertain the amount. The rule contended for by the claimant (half the present pay) might be a very good one, if it had any legal sanction ; but, unfortunately for the argument, it reposes upon no authority of law. The conclusion, it seems to me, is irre- sistible, that no pension can be allowed, there being no law prescrib- ing at what rate such pension shall be paid. Probably, at the sug- gestion of the Department, Congress will at once correct the omission. The argument for the claimant suggests the case of passed mid- shipmen as furnishing a precedent in favor of this claim. Not so. It appears from the Naval Register that the grade of passed midship- men was recognised as early as the year 1820. No doubt it was instituted in pursuance of the authority reposed in the President to fix the pay of petty officers, midshipmen, seamen, ordinary seamen, and marines. This authority was first conferred by the seventh sec- tion of the act to provide a naval armament, approved March 27, 1794, and was embraced by subsequent provisions, till the passage of the pay law of 1835. On the 25th of- June, 1827, the following general order was approved by the President : " Passed midshipmen will receive warrants as such, will take rank of all other midshipmen, and will receive the pay of twenty-five dollars per month and two rations per day." This regulation, certainly made in pursuance of law, so far as regards pay, remained unchanged on the' first day of January, 1835, and continues to this time as the rule of the Depart- ment in relation to the allowance of pensions to the widows of passed midshipmen under the act of .1834. Their pensions are paid at the rate of twelve dollars and fifty cents per month. After a careful investigation, I am of the opinion that none of the cases cited in the argument will justify the present claim. Assistant surgeons, mentioned in existing laws, are the same as surgeons' mates in the previous acts. The same remark applies to commanders and masters, whose titles PRINCIPLES AND DECISIONS. 185 were changed by the act of March 3, 1837. It is very clear that this act furnishes no ground of argument in favor of the present claim. It provides that "such change of title shall not affect the rank, pay, or privileges, of any master commandant or sailing-master now in the service." I am of opinion, therefore, that the existing laws do not authorize the allowance of a pension to the widow of an engineer in the navy. Such being my opinion, it follows, of course, in. my view of the case, that there is no law prescribing at what rate such pension shall be paid. In answer to the further inquiry of the Commissioner, I have to remark that the practice of the Department in relation to the com- mencement of pensions is unquestionably correct. Where the death of the husband occurred prior to the passage of the act of 1834, the pension should commence from the date of the act. In all other cases, it should commence from the time of the husband's death. Otherwise a widow might be entitled to receive a pension retro- actively during the whole period her husband was in office. In some other cases, probably, as in this case, if allowed from the date of the act, the pension would commence from a period before the husband entered the service ; and when a few more years have elapsed, the rule, if followed, would allow a pension to a widow to commence before her husband was born. The rule adopted by the Department should be adhered to. [Opinion of Attomey-General, October 14, 1847.] Acts of 1813, 1814, and 1837. In reply to the question arising in the case of Peter Gordon, and proposed by your letter of February 6, 1838, I have the honor to state that, in my opinion, the first section of the act of March 3, 1837, is confined to cases where the death occurred whilst the person was in the naval service. But, under the navy pension act of Janu- ary 20, 1813, and the second section of the like act of March 4, 1814, it does not appear to me that the death need occur in the naval service, provided it be proved to have been occasioned by a wound received whilst in the service and in the line of his duty. [Opinion of Attorney-General, April 6, 1838.] Act of 1837. The act of March 3, 1837,. was passed for the purpose of securing a more uniform and equal distribution of the Navy Pension Fund. It introduces several new principles ; and, among others, establishes as an equitable rule, that where a pension is granted to the children, it ought to continue until they attain the age of twenty-one years. As the act is not only prospective, but retrospective, in its operation, I think it equitable in itself, and fully warranted by the liberal con- struction which should be given to such a law, to pay to those chil- dren, whose pensions expired under former laws at an earlier age 186 NAVY AND MARINE tflDOWS' PENSION ACTS. than twenty-one, the half pay for the balance. Tarn accordingly of opinion that the claim of Miss Grennell is authorized by the late act'. [Opinion of Attorney-General, April 10, 1837.] In answer to the question proposed in your letter of the 24th ult., I have the honor to inform you, that, as Captain Joseph Bainbridge left no widow, but left an only child, then under the age of twenty- one, who is yet living, though now over that age, I am of opinion that such child is entitled to a pension, under the act of the 3d of March, 1837, from the death of her father to the time when she at- tained the age of twenty-one. This result is in accordance with the rules already settkd by me in the interpretation of this law. [Opinion oif Attorney-General, April 11, 1837.] It appears from the papers enclosed in your letter of the 8th in- stant, that Commodore Samuel Barron died in the year 1810, leaving a widow and two children (a son and daughter) of tender age ; that his widow died in 1818 ; that the son. Lieutenant Barron, of the navy, is yet living, and is now 28 years of age ; tbat the daughter died in 1821, being then 23 years of age, leaving one child, (a daughter,) who is yet living, and now the wife of G. W. Camp ; and that the son and granddaughter now claim a pension under the act of the 3d of March last, " for the more equitable administration of the navy pension fund." On the validity of this claim you ask my opinion. In accordance with the decisions already made on this law, I am of opinion that the son of Commodore Barron will be entitled to one- half of the pension given by it from his father's death to the death of his sister ; and to the whole peilsion from that time to the time when he arrived at the age of 21 years ; provided (as I presume was the fact) no pension was received by his mother. On the other band, it is evident that Mrs. Camp, the granddaughter, is not entitled by the terms of the law ; because the pension, in the event of there be- ing no widow, is confined to the children of the decedent ; and, when received by them, is to cease on their death, or on their attaining the age of 21 years. Grandchildren are thus plainly excluded. Accord- ing to the opinion expressed by me in the case of the personal repre- sentatives of Mrs. Murray, the widow and daughter of Commodore Barron, having each died before the passage of the law, had no right which they could transmit to their personal representatives ; and con- sequently Mrs. Camp's claim is, in this respect, also invalid. [Opinion of Attorney-General, April 12, 1837.] The communication of the Commissioner of Pensions, under date of the 12th, transmitted with yours of the 13th instant, has been considered, and I am of opinion that the second section of the act of August 23, 1842, operates a total repeal of the first section of the act of March 3, 1837, and that the case recently presented to the Commissioner of Pensions cannot therefore be entertained by him. PRINCIPLES AND DECISIONS. 187 The effect of the act of August 16, 1841, was temporarily to con- tinue m force the act of March 3, 1837, in regard to a class of claims to which that now hefore the Commissioner clearly belonged, but which not having been preferred within the period limited by that act, and the_ whole power conferred on the Commissioner of Pensions by the original act having been revoked by the repealing law, can now be allowed by Congress alone. The case is an equitable one, for which, upon a proper application to the legislative branch of the government, nrovision would doubtless be made. [Opinion of AttornBy-General, April 15, 1844.] This decision was reversed by Secretary Ewing, on the ground that the pension acts confer vested rights, and that consequently all re- peals of them are prospective, but do not extinguish any claim which may have arisen while they were in existence. The present Secretary has, however, reinstated the rule established by the Attorney-General. Act of 1845. In your communication of the 14thinstant, you request my opinion on a question submitted to you by the Commissioner of Pensions in relation to the proper construction of the naval pension act of 3d March, 1845. The Commissioner states the question to be: "Whe- ther the pensions granted by this act shall commence when the last five years' pensions ended, or when the last pensions, under the act of 1837, were paid to the pensioners respectively." The act of 3d March, 1845, embraces only the cases of those widows whose hus- bands have died under circumstances to entitle them to pensions under the provisions of the pension act of 30th June, 1834. Pensions granted by that act terminated in 1839. By the act of 1837, a pro- vision was made for pensions to widows of officers, seamen, and ma- rines, who had died in the naval service, without specifying the mode of the death. Its terms were more comprehensive, and embraced many cases which were not within the provisions of the act of 1834 ; while those entitled under the act of 1834 were clearly entitled under the act of 1837 ; .and many thus entitled applied and received the benefits of this act. The question submitted depends on the inquiry whether the act of 1837 may be regarded as a renewal of the pen- sions previously granted. If it be not so construed, a widow whose pension expired in 1839, granted under the act of 1834, may have received, under the act of 1837, her pension, by reason of the death of her husband, from the 30th June, 1839, to 31st August, 1842 ; and by the act of the 3d March, 1845, receive the same pension for the same cause, during the same time ; thus receiving a double pen- sion for the same period of time. This cannot be presumed to have been the intention of Congress ; nor will such a construction give effect to the proviso to the act under consideration. I am^ therefore, of opinion that the act of 1837 was a renewal of the pensions pre- 188 NATY AND MARINE WIDOWS' PENSION ACTS. viously granted for five years, withia the meaning of the act of 3d March, 1845 ; and that widows' pensions, under this act, shall com- mence from the period at which they ceased, whether under the act of 1834, or that of 1837, or the act of the 16th August, 1841. [Opinion of Attorney-General, March 19, 1845.] I have considered the general question presented in your letter of the 10th instant, as to the effect of the act of March 3, 1845, re- viewing certain naval pensions for the term of five years, and its application to the particular case of Mrs. Ann J. Ross, widow of Lieutenant Eoss of the marine corps, who was killed in battle with the Seminole Indians in the month of December, 1836, the facts of whose case are set forth in the letter addressed by the Commissioner of Pensions to the Secretary of the Navy on the 3d instant. In the letter which I had the honor to address to you on the 19th ultimo, I expressed the opinion that the act of 1837 was a renewal of the pensions previously granted to widows entitled under the act of 1834 within the meaning of the act of March 3, 1845. By the death of her husband in battle, Mrs. Ross was entitled under the act of 1884. The fact of her being placed on the pension roll by virtue of the more comprehensive terms of the act of 1837, does not affect her rights under the act of March 3, 1845. The purpose of Congress was manifestly to extend a pension for five years to those widows who had previously received pensions in consequence of the death of their husbands, (being ofiBcers, seamen, and marines,) who had been killed in battle, or who had died by reason of a wound received in the line of their duty, or who had died from disease contracted, or of a casu- alty by drowning or otherwise, or of injury received, while in the line of their duty. This intention would be defeated in cases of the most meritorious character, if the words employed be construed to embrace only such cases of pension as were granted for five years. The terms of the act are fully satisfied by extending its provisions to cases which were within the act of 1834, although the pensions were granted for an indefinite period ; and I am of opinion that this may be done whether the pensions were granted by the Commissioner of Pensions under the act of 1834, or under that of 1837, provided the pension granted would have been authorized by the act of 1834. Mrs. Ross is, therefore, entitled to the benefit of the act of March 3, 1845, subject to its restriction. [Opinion of Attorney-General, April 14, 1845.] I had the honor to receive your letter of the 2d ult., requesting my opinion on the claims of Elizabeth B. Chandler and Catharine L. Armistead, for a renewal of their pensions, under the act of March 3, 1845. By that it is provided " that the pensions for the period of five years, which have been heretofore granted out of the naval pension fund to the widows of officers, seamen, and marines, who have been killed, or died by reason of a wound received in the line of their duty, or who have died by reason of disease contracted, or of a casualty by drowning or otherwise, or of injury received while PRINCIPLES AND DECISIONS. 189 in the line of their duty, and which pensions have ceased in conse- quence of the expiration of the period for which they were originally granted, or for which they were subsequently renewed, shall be con- tinued for another period of five years to such of said widows as may have remained unmarried, to commence from the day on which such pensions respectively terminated." According to the statement con- tained in your letter, the husband of Mrs. Chandler died in July, 1841, of a olsease contracted while he was in the performance of his duty. She was, therefore, entitled to a pension either under the law of 1834 or that of 1837 ; the language of both acts including her case. She received a pension under the latter, commencing from the date of her husband's death, and continuing until August, 1842 — a period of one year and a month, when the law of 1837 was repealed. It was subsequently decided by the department that in all cases where a widow who was equally entitled under the law of 1834 had received her pension under the act of 1887 for a less period than five years, and by the repeal of that law had been cut short of her five years' pension, might still be pensioned for the remainder of the term under the law of 1834. Under this decision Mrs. Chandler's pension for the residue of her term was renewed on the 11th day of March, 1845, to take effect from August, 1842, and expired in July, 1846. The case of Mrs. Armistead is similar in all respects neces- sary to be considered in the decision of the question submitted. Her husband died on the 14th day of April, 1841 ; and on the 17th day of July following she was allowed a pension under the act of 1837, after the repeal of that law ; being within the class of widows entitled to a five years' pension under the act of 1834. A pension certificate was issued in her favor under that law on the 16th day of May, 1845. Her pension commenced from the 14th of April, 1841 ; but the amount previously paid her under the act of 1837 was directed to be deducted. Her five years expired on the 14th of April, 1846. Upon this statement of facts the question submitted by you for my conside- ration is whether Mrs. Chandler and Mrs. Armistead may now have properly the benefit of the act of the 3d of March, 1845, as widows whose pensions had expired at the time the act passed ; or whether they are concluded by the renewal of their pensions and the receipt of the same, under the act of 1834, subsequent to the passage of the law of 1845. It is very clear that the act of the Commissioner of Pensions, in renewing their certificates, cannot change the law, or in any respect impair their rights, if any they have, to claim the bounty of the government under that act. And it is not less clear that the receipt of the periodical payments, secured by the certificates, is equally inefficacious to any such result. The true construction of the act took date from its passage, uninfluenced by any extraneous cir- cumstances or subsequent event. Its meaning must be gathered from its language, in connexion with the general system of legislation upon the same subject matter. While, therefore, I am of opinion, after a careful examination of the act in question, that the cases_ of Mrs. Chandler and Mrs. Armistead do not come within its provisions, it is 190 NAVY AND MARINE "WIDOWS' PENSION ACTS. proper to remark that my opinion is not based in any respect upon the ground assumed in the inquiry submitted, that these parties are estopped or concluded by any act or event subsequent to the passage of the act under which they now claim. That doctrine cannot be sustained ; nor is it necessary to invoke it in this case. Neither of the cases submitted is provided for in the terms of the law relied upon in their behalf. The act, you will observe, is confined to cases where widows have already enjoyed a five years' pension under previous laws, and which had ceased in consequence of the expiration of the period for which it had been granted or renewed. When the law of 1845 went into operation, neither Mrs. Chandler nor Mrs. Armistead had been a widow for the period of five years. The husband of the former died in July, 1841, and that of the latter on the 14th of April previous. Both, therefore, were then entitled to an unexpired portion of their first five years under the act of 1834. Neither had exhausted their five years' pension under a law then in full force. It is true they were not in the actual receipt of the money ; they had not obtained their certificates, as no decision had been made by the proper department. The answer to this is readily given. The act under consideration is not based upon the action of the department, but upon the previous statutes in pari materia, espe- cially upon the law of 1834. They were entitled by an existing law; and if entitled, then their pensions had' not ceased within the language or spirit of the act of 1845. Their first five years had not expired. The act gives another term of five years to those only whose primary right, whether by original grant or renewal, had ceased in conse- quence of the expiration of the period for which they were originally granted or renewed. The continuation is extended to those pensions only which have been theretofore granted for the period of five years, to commence from the day on which such pensions respectively ter- minated. The language is too plain, it seems to me, to admit of a doubt, that Congress intended to include such cases only as had actu- ally expired at the date of the law. No other construction can be given short of downright legislation. The terms of the act apply so explicitly to past cases, that it cannot be made to include such as have expired since its passage. No provision being made for future cases, they must be left to the justice of Congress, where I have no doubt an appeal might well be made in behalf of all similar claimants. [Opinion of Attorney-General, January 23, 1847.] Act of 1848. I think the first section of the act renewing certain naval pensions, &c., passed August 11, 1848, is not to be regarded as embracing only those widows and children to whom pensions had been granted, in single instances, by private acts. Such a restricted construction is obviously opposed to the intention of Congress. The description of the first class is in these words, viz : " all those widows and such child or children as are now receiving a pension under any of the PRINCIPLES AND DECISIONS. 191 laws of Congress passed prior to the 1st of August, 1841." The words are, " any of the laws." not ''private laivs," as it would have been, it such only were intended. The exception which follows shows the^same intention, becftuse the excepted law passed on the 3d March, 18oi was one of the broadest and most general pension laws which had been enacted ; and there was no room for the exception, unless It was included in the general description of the persons entitled to the renewal. This is quite decisive of what was in the mind of the legislature. The description of the other class entitled to the renewal IS equally general — " those widows and children who have received pensions at any time within five years prior to the passage of this act." All these persons are, by the express words, within the pur- view of the act, and are declared to be entitled to a renewal. But then comes the supposed restriction, which by a violent construction would throw out the greater part — almost all who had before been included by a precise and definite description : they " may and shall continue to receive the same amount as they have received under any special act from the time such special act expired." The word "special" here does not mean "private," but particular. I think the word is used in that sense. It comports with the general tenor and language of the whole section. The other sense of which the word in another connexion would be susceptible, would, if applied to it here, o\'erturn and control all the other language used in the direct description of the persons intended, explicit and unequivocal as it is, contrary to the apparent intention of Congress. As to the question under the 2d section, there might be more room for doubt. In enacting that " the pension of a first assistant engi- neer " shall be " the same as that of a lieutenant of marines, and the pension of the widow of a first assistant engineer the same as that of the widow of a lieutenant of marines," Congress seems to have lost sight of the fact that there was a second lieutenant of marines, and might therefore be supposed to have referred to the first lieuten- ant only. But, in common parlance, "the lieutenant," without further designation, whether of marines or of infantry, would uni- versally be understood to mean the senior lieutenant and not the second lieutenant; and this familiar and reasonable rule- — the mean- ing of language in common use, which is always a most sure guide to the true legislative intent — may be applied in this instance, where the law seems to have been enacted without a minute or particular attention to the previously existing law. [Opinion of Aftorney-General, Sopternber 6, 1843.] A widow was pensioned under the act of March 3, 1837, which was repealed by another in August, 1842, when her pension expired. On the 16th May, 1846, she was pensioned under the act of June 30, 1834, deducting what she had received under that of 1837. Her five years expired on the 14th April, 1846. She applied for the benefits of the acts of March 3, 1845, and March 3, 1847. The Pension Office rejected the application on the ground that, under the 3d March, 192 NAVY AND MARINE WIDOWS* PENSION ACTS. 1845, no one could claim whose pension expired after its passage. On appeal, it was decided that as the last mentioned act was in exis- tence when she was placed under the act of 1834, she should be allowed the benefit of the act of 1845 ; her pension to commence on the 1st September, 1842, and to be renewed under the 11th August, ■j^g^g^ [Secretary of the Interior, case of Catharine L. Armistead.] FORM OF APPLICATION FOR WIDOW'S NAVY PENSION. To the Commissioner of Pensions : The memorial of the undersigned , the widow of , who was a in the Naval service of the United States, respectfully showeth : That the said entered the service in the year , and died therein, while holding the ranlc above mentioned, on the (a) by reason of (6) in the line of duty. That the undersigned was married to the said » o^ the day of , in the year , and that the following is a correct statement of the name... and age... of the child... of such parties now living: (c) That your memorialist remain... unmarried, and widow of the said i to the , and referring to the evidence filed (d) , claims the benefit of the laws granting Navy pensions to the widows of Officers, Sea- men, and Marines, who have died in the Naval service, and requests that her name may be inscribed on the roll of pensioners, payable at the Navy Pension Agency, (e) Sworn and subscribed before me on this day of ■ the year Pension Office, May 23, 1853. Sir : — For your information, I enclose a form of application for widow's Navy pension, together with a printed sheet exhibiting the description of evidence furnished to this office under the General Order of the 17th February, 1851, in every case of disability or death in the Naval service. In all claims for widow's pension, or renewal thereof, it must be shown by evidence, accompanying the application, or already on file, that the husband lost his life while in the Naval service, by reason (a) state date, and whether on board ship or in hospital, and at what place or station. (6) State whether by wounds, injuries received, casualties incurred, or disease con- tracted. (c) Insert names and ages of children. The memorial should be accompanied by the certificate of the magistrate and the affidavit of credible witnesses, showing the identity and widowhood of memorialist. The official character of the magistrate must in every instance be certified by the clerk of the county under his seal of office. Herewith, or already on file in the Pension Office. Insert location of Agency. FORM OF APPLICATION. 193 of wounds or injuries received, casualty incurred, or disease contracted in the line of duty. In cases of date subsequent to that of the Gen- eral Order, such evidence may generally he found here ; but if of prior date, must, if practicable, be furnished by the certificates of medical or otiier commissioned officers of the Navy, cognizant of the facts. If, after using due diligence, such certificates cannot be obtained, the applicant can then present such other testimony as would be taken in a court of justice. The usual legal proof of marriage must be produced, accompanied by a statement of the names and ages of all children of the par-ties, whether the fruit of their own or of former marriage. This last is to be desired, not only as a security to the Government, but as facili- tating any future claim on the part of the children. The widowhood and identity of the applicant should be stated in the memorial, and certified by the officiating magistrate, or established by the affidavit of credible witnesses ; and all evidence (excepting the official certificates of Naval officers) must be given by affidavit before a magistrate, whose official character shall be certified by the clerk of the county (in which he acts) under his seal of office. Applications for Orphans' Navy Pension may be made in the fol- lowing cases : — 1. Death of mother before the father. 2. Death of mother since the father, but without having received the benefit of the pension laws. 3. Death or intermarriage of their mother since having received such benefit. In the 1st and 2d cases, the same testimony would be required as in widows' applications, together with legal proof of the names and ages of the children. In the 3d case, the latter only. Orphans' applications can be made by the legally appointed guar- dian, in any form embracing a statement of facts. Claims for arrearages of pension may be paid to the orphans themselves, if adults, or to an administrator, for the sole and exclusive use and benefit of the children of the deceased parties. FORM OF APPLICATION OF A WIDOW IN ORDER TO RENEW HER PENSION, UNDER THE ACT OF To the Ccrmmissioner of Pensions : The memorial of the undersigned, the widow of the late •••"••••, ' ^ho ^^s a in the navy of the United States, respectfully shows : That her husband, the aforesaid .■. entered the service of the United States in the year ; that, while m the said service, and- 13 194 NAVT AND MARINE WIDOWS' PENSION ACTS, holding the rank above mentioned, he departed this life, at (a) ,,, on tlu; day of , in the year ; that the undersigned waa married to the said on the day of , in the year , and in proof thereof, she refers to papers on file in the Pension Office, upon which she obtained a pension for five years. She therefore claims the benefits of the act of Congress of the , granting pensions to the widovi^s of officers, seamen, and marines, who have died in the service aforesaid; and she requests that her name may be inscribed on the roll of pensioners under that law, who are paid at , in the State of Sworn to and subscribed before me, on this day of , fn the year [The certificate of official character and signature of the magistrate who may admi- nister the oath to be here subjoined.] (o) If at a navy yard, the fact must be stated, and the name of the navy yard ; if on board of a vessel of war, the name of the vessel mi»t be given. PART VI BOUNTY LAND LAWS. No. 1. IN BEHALF OP OFFICERS AND SOLDIERS OF THE REVOLUTION WHO ENGAGED FOR THE WAR. To provide for the raising of eighty-eight battalions to serve for the volt. Resolved, That, in addition to a money bounty of twenty dollars to each non-commissioned oiEcer and private soldier, Congress make provision for granting lands, in the following proportions, to the officers and soldiers who shall engage in the service, and continue therein to the close of the war, or until discharged by Congress, and to the representatives of such officers and soldiers as shall be slain by the enemy. Such lands to be provided by the United States ; and whatever expense shall be necessary to procure such land, the said expense shall be paid and borne by the States, in the same propor- tion as the other expenses of the war, viz : to a colonel, five hundred acres ; to a lieutenant-colonel, four hundred and fifty acres ; to a major, four hundred acres ; to a captain, three hundred acres ; to a lieutenant, two hundred acres ; to an ensign, one hundred and fifty acres ; each non-commissioned officer and soldier, one hundred acres. [Resolution — In Congress, September 16, 1776.] Resolved, That the bounty and grants of land ofi"ered by Congress, by a resolution of the l^th instant, as an encouragement to the officers and soldiers to engage to serve in the army of the United States during the war, shall extend to all who are, or shall be, en- listed for that term ; the bounty of ten dollars, which any of the soldiers have received from the continent on account of a former enlistment, to be reckoned in part payment of the twenty dollars ofi'ered by the said resolution : That no officer in the continental army be allowed to hold more than one commission, or to receive pay but in one capacity, at the same time. [Resolution — In Congress, September 18, 1776.] (195) 196 BOUNTY LAND LAWS. Resolved, That the provision for granting lands, by the resolution' of September sixteenth, one thousand seven hundred and seventy- six, be, and is hereby, extended to the general officers, in the follow- ing proportion : to a major-general, one thousand one hundred acres ; to a brigadier-general, eight hundred and fifty acres. [Resolution — In Congress, August 19, 1780.] Congress resumed the consideration of the report of the committee on the Medical Department; and, on the consideration of the follow- ing, it was Resolved, That the several officers of the, Medical Department, except the clerks and stewards, shall, at the end of the war, be entitled to a certain provision of land, in the proportion following, to wit : The director to have the same quantity as a brigadier-general ; chief physicians and purveyor the same as a colonel ; physicians and surgeons, and apothecary, the same as a lieutenant-colonel; regi- mental surgeons and assistants to the purveyor and apothecary, the sarfle as a major ; hospital and regimental surgeons' mate, the same as a captain. [Resolution — In Congress, September 22, 1780.] \ On the 3d October, 1780, Congress reorganized the army, the effect of which was to throw many of the officers out of service. They therefore, at the same time, adopted the following RESOLUTION. And wbereas, by tbe foregoing arrangement, many deserving officers must become supernumerary, and it is proper that regard be had to them : Resolved, That from the time the reform of the army takes place, they be entitled to half pay for seven years, in specie or other cur- rent money equivalent, and also grants of land at the close of the • war, agreeably to the resolution of the 16th of September, 1776. The government organised under our present Constitution has made provision for redeeming the promises of the Continental Con- gress in this regard, and the officers and soldiers, (or, in the event of their death, their heirs,) who have not yet received the Bounty Land thus promised them, can still obtain it. REGULATIONS FOR THE OFFICERS AND SOLDIERS OF THE REVOLU- TIONARY WAR WHO ACQUIRED A RIGHT TO LAND FROM THE UNITED STATES, BUT HAVE NOT RECEIVED IT. • By an act of Congress, of the 16th September, 1776, it is pro- vided, that the officers and soldiers who engaged for, and continued to serve, during the war, or until discharged by Congress, shall re- ceive land in proportion to their rank. N. B. — Those who engaged for three years, or for any other period than during the war, are not entitled to land from the United States. The following declaration must be filled up and sworn to by the claimant : IN BEHALF OF THOSE ENLISTED FOE THE WAR. 197 State of i Cmntyof ^**- I. , aged years, do upon oath testify and declare, that, I entered the service of the tFnited Slates on the day of , in the year 17..., for the term of years, and that I served in the company commanded by ., in the regiment No , commanded by , of the line, and was honorably discharged on , in the year 17..., from the regiment commanded by I further declare, that I have never received a warrant for the Bounty Land promised to me on the part of the United States ; nor have I ever assigned or transferred my claim in any manner whatsoever ; therefore. Know all men by these presents. That I, aforesaid, do hereby consti- tute and appoint to be my true and lawful attorney, for me and in my name to demand and receive from the Secretary of War of the United States, a warrant for the quantity of land due to me as aforesaid ; and my said attorney is hereby fully authorized and empowered to constitute and appoint one or more substitutes or attorneys Amder him for the special purposes above expressed. Attest, I, , aged years, do upon oath, declare that I have been long acquainted with , who has subscribed the above declaration in my pre- sence, and well knowithat he is the identical person he therein represents himself to be; and fiirther, I do believe, that he did perform the military service therein stated. Attest, Before me, , personally appeared the above named , sub- scriter to the foregoing declaration, and in my presence acknowledged the power of attorney thereto subjoined, to be his free act and deed ; and, likewise, personally ap- peared , who bath subscribed the above certificate of identity, both to me well known to be men of respectability and truth, and made solemn oath to the truth of the depositions by them respectively subscribed, this day of , 18... , Justice of the Peace, In testimony that the above-written was a magistrate authorized to administer oaths, and take acknowledgments, &c., in the State of , at the above date, and that his name there subscribed appears to me to be his usual signature, I have hereunto affixed the county seal, and subscribed my name and quality, at , this day of , 18... * , Clerk, &c. Should the party apply directly, he will omit the power of at- torney. A Revolutionary Bounty Land claim descends to heirs general, and will be applied for after the following form : REGULATIONS FOR THE HEIRS OF OFFICERS AND SOLDIERS OF THE REVOLUTIONARY ARMY, WHO WERE SLAIN BY THE ENEMY, OR WHO HAVE DIED SINCE THE WAR, AND HAVE NOT RECEIVED LAND FROM THE UNITED STATES. By an act of Congress of the 16th September, 1776, it is provided that the ofScers and soldiers of the army upon the continental establishment, who engaged for, and continued to serve, during the war, or until discharged by Congress, and the heirs of such officers and soldiers as shall be slain by the enemy, shall receive land in pro- portion to their rank. N. B,— Those who engaged for three years, or for any other period than during the war, or who died of sickness, fatigue, or casualty, are not entitled to land from the United States. 198 BOUNTY LAND LAWS. The following declaration (and enclosed blank form of heirship) must be filled up and signed by the proper authorities. State of County of I, , heir at law of , do, upon oath, testify and declare, to the best of m)' knowledge and belief, that did enter the service in 17..., for the term of and served as a in the Regiment No. , under the command of Colonel , of the line; and that he continued in the service aforesaid until I further declare that I have never received a warrant for the bounty land promised to on the part of the United States; nor do I believe that he ever received it, or transferred his claim to it in any manner whatsoever : Know all men by these presents, That I, aforesaid, do hereby consti- tute and appoint to be my true and lawful attorney, for roe, and in my name, to demand and receive from the Commissioner of Pensions, a warrant for the quantity of land due to me as aforesaid ; and my said attorney is hereby fully autho- rized and empowered to constitute and appoint one or more substitutes or attorneys under him, for the special purposes above expressed. Attest, Personally appeared the above named , subscriber to the foregoing declaration, and made oath to the same, and in my presence acknowledged the power of attorney thereto subjoined to be free act and deed, for the purposes therein mentioned. Attest, ^Justice of the Peace. In testimony that the above written was a magistrate authorized to administer oaths, and take acknowledgments, &c., in the State of at the above date, and that his name there subscribed appears to me to be his usual signature, I have hereunto affixed the county seal, and subscribed my name and quality, at , this day of , 18... .J , Clerk, &c. Should the heirs not apply through an attorney, of course the power in the above form will be omitted. No. 2. ■J » FOR NON-COMMISSIONED OEFICERS AND SOL- DIERS OF THE WAR OF 1812, ENLISTED FOR FIVE YEARS OR THE WAR. An act for completing the existing military establishment. Sec. 2. And he it further enacted, That there be allowed and paid to each effective and able-bodied man, recruited or re-enlisted for that service, for the term of five years, unless sooner discharged, the sum of sixteen dollars; and * * * * -whenever any non-commissioned ofiicer or soldier shall be discharged from the service, who shall have obtained from the commanding officer of his company, battalion, or regiment, a certificate that he had faithfully performed his duty whilst in service, he shall, moreover, be allowed and paid, in addition NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICERS, &C.— WAR OF 1812. 199 to the aforesaid bounty, three months' pay, and one hundred and sixty acres of land ; and the heirs and representatives of those non- commissioned officers or soldiers, who may be killed in action, or die m the service of the United States, shall, likewise, be paid and al- lowed the said additional bounty of three months' pay, and one hundred and sixty acres of land, to be designated, surveyed, and laid off, at the public expense, in such manner, and upon such terms and conditions as may be provided by law. [Approved, December 24, 1811.] - An act to raise an additional military force. Sec. 1. Be it enacted hy the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That there be immediately^ raised ten regiments of infantry, two regiments of ar- tillery, and one regiment of light dragoons, to be enlisted for the term of five years, unless sooner discharged. Sec. 12. And he it further enacted. That * * * * whenever any noa-commissioned officer, or soldier, shall be discharged from the ser- vice, who shall have obtained from the commanding officer of his company, battalion, or regiment, a certificate that he had faithfully performed his duty whilst in service, he shall moreover be allowed and paid * * * one hundred and sixty acres of land ; and the heirs and representatives of those non-commissioned officers or soldiers who may be killed in action, or die in the service of the United States, shall likewise be paid and allowed * * * one hundred and sixty acres of land ; to be designated, surveyed, and laid oif, at public expense, in such manner, and upon such terms and conditions, as may be pre- scribed by law. [Approved, January 10, 1812.] An act authorizing the President of the United States to accept and organize certain volunteer military corps. The first section authorizes the President to accept of any company or companies of volunteers, either of artillery, cavalry, or infantry, who may associate and offer themselves for the service, not exceeding 50,000 men. The second section prescribes that any company, battalion, regi- ment, brigade or division, thus offering itself for the service, shall be liable to be called upon to do duty at any time the President may deem it necessary, within two years after the offer, and shall be bound to continue in service for the term of twelve months after they shall have arrived at the place of rendezvous, unless sooner discharged. Sec. 6. And he it further enacted, That the heirs and representa- tives of any non-commissioned officer or soldier, who may be killed in action, or die in the actual service of the United States, shall be entitled to receive one hundred and sixty acres of land ; to be de- signated, surveyed, and laid off at the public expense, in such man- ner, and upon such terms and conditions as may be provided by law. [Approved, February 6, 1812.] An act in addition to the act entitled "An act to raise an additional military force," and for other purposes. Sec. 18. And he it further enacted, That the act, entitled "An act authorizing the President of the United States to accept and or- 200 BGUNTT LAND LAWS. ganize certain volunteer military corps," and the act, entitled "An act supplementary to the act, entitleti 'An act aut&frrizing the Presi- dent of the United States to aecept and organize) certain rolunteer military corps/ " be, and the same are hereby repealedj from and after the first day of Februaiy next : Frotfidedf That nothing herein contained shall be so construed as to deprive the officers and men who may have entered the service as volunteers, under the said acts, of any rights, immunities, or privileges therein secured, or the United States of the services of stich volunteers, agreeably to the provisions of said acts. [Approved, January 29, 1813.] Sec. 1. Be it enacted hy the Senate and HouM of Mepresen- tatiDes of the United States of America in Congress asgenMedf That there be immediately raised ten regiments of infantry ^wo regiments of artillery, and one regiment of light dragoons^ to be enlisted for the term of five years, unless sooner discharged, * * * * Sec. 12, And he it further enacted, That there shall be allowed and paid to each effective able-bodied man, recruited as aforesaid, to serve for the term of five years, a bounty of sixteen dollars ; but the payment of eight dollars of the said bounty shall be deferred until he shall be mfistered, and have joined some military corps of the United States for service. And whenever any non-commissioned officer, or soldier, shall be discharged from the service, who shall have obtained from the Commanding officer of his company^ battalion, or regiment, a certificate that he had faithfully performed his duty whilst in Service, he shall, moreover, be allowed" and paid, in addition to the said bounty, three months' pay, and one hundred and sixty acres of land ; and the heirs and representatives of those non-commissioned officers or soldiers who may be killed in action, or die in the service of the United States, shall likewise be paid and allowed the said additional bounty of three months' pay, and one hundred and sixty acres of land ; to be designated, surveyed, and laid ofi", at the public expense, in such manner, and upon such terms and conditions, as may be provided by law. [Approved, January 11, 1813.] An act to provide for designating, surveying, and granting, the military bounty lands. SeO. 4. And he it further enacted, That no claim for the military land bounties aforesaid shall be assignable or transferable in any manner whatever^ until after a patent shall have been granted in the manner aforesaid. All sales, mortgages, contracts, or agreements, of any nature whatever^ made prior thereto, for the purpose or with intent of alienating, pledging, or mortgaging any such claim, are hereby declal-ed and shall be held null and void ; nor shall any tract of land, granted as aforesaid, be liable to be taken in execution or sold on account of any such sale, mortgage, contract, or agreement, or on accotmt of any debt contracted prior to the date of the patent, either by the person originally entitled to the land, or by his heirs or legal representatives, or by viftile of any process, or suit at law, or judgment of court, against a person entitled to receive his patent as aforesaid. [Approved, May 6, 1819.] NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICERS, &C. — ^WAR OF 1812. 201 An act supplementary to the act entitled "An act for the more perfect organization of the army of the United States." Sec. 1. Be it enacted hy the Senate and House of Representatives ^ the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the President of the United States be, and he is hereby, authorized, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, to appoint one addi- tional major to the first regiment of light dragoons, the regiment of light artillery, each regiment of infantry, and the rifle regiment, in the army of the United States, Tvho stall receive the like pay, rations, forage, and other emoluments, as officers of the same grade and corps of the present military establishment. * * * * Sec. 4. And he it further enacted, That, in order to complete the present military establishment to the full number authorized by law, with the greatest possible dispatch, there shall be paid to each effective able-bodied man, who shall be duly enlisted into the service of the United States, after the first day of February next, to serve for the term of five years, or during the war, an advance of twenty- four dollars, on account of his pay, in addition to the existing bounty ; one-half of such advance to be paid at the enlistment of the recruit, and the other half when he shall be mustered and have joined some military corps of the United States, for service ; and a bounty of one hundred and sixty acres of land, as heretofore established by law. [Approved, January 20, 1813.] An act to amend the "Act in addition to the act entitled 'An act to raise an additional military force, and for other purposes.' " Sec. 1. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That five of the regiments which were authorized to be raised by "An act in addition to the act entitled 'An act to raise an additional military force, and for other purposes,' " * passed the twenty-ninth day of January, one thousand eight hundred and thirteen, may, at the dis- cretion of the President of the United States, be enlisted for and during the war, unless sooner dischurged, and be Kmited, as to service, to the defence of the seaboard of the United States, or of such part thereof as the President may elect and determine." Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That each man recruited under the authority of this act, be allowed the same bounty, in money and land, as is allowed by law to men enlisted for five years, or for the war ; and that the officers, non-commissioned, officers, musicians, and privates, shall receive the same pay, clothing, subsistence, and forage, be entitled to the same benefits, be subject to the same rules and regulations, and be placed, in every respect, on the same footing as the other regular troops of the United States. "[Approved, July 5, 1813.] *Thi3 act provides for raising a number of regiments, not to exceed tvrenty, to serve one year, and to receive all the emoluments of the then existing military establishment — the land and bounty excepted. 202 BOUNTi' LAND LAWS. An act to auttorizo the President to receive into service certain volunteer corps. Skc. 1. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the President of the United States be, and he is. hereby, authorized to receive into the service of the United States such proportion of the volunteers, authorized by the act of sixth February, one thousand eight hundred and twelve, and the act supplementary thereto, of the sixth July, one thousand eight hundred and twelve, and accepted under the authority of said acts, as, in his judgment, the public service may require : Provided, That the volunteers so received shall engage to serve for five years, or during the war, unless sooner discharged. Sec. 2. And be it furtlter enacted, That the volunteers which shall be taken into service under the authority of the preceding section, shall be entitled to the same bounty, pay, rations, clothing, forage, and emoluments of every kind, and to the same benefits and allow- ances, as the regular troops of the United States. Sec. 3. And be it further enacted. That the officers of corps of volunteers which shall be taken into service, shall rank, according to grade and the dates of their commissions or appointments, with other officers of the army. [Approved, February 24, 1814.] An act making further provision for filling the ranks of the army of the United States. Sec. 1. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That from and after the passing of this act, each and every commissioned officer who shall be employed in the recruiting service shall be, and he hereby is, authorized to enlist into the army of the United States, any free, effective, able-bodied man, between the ages of eighteen and fifty years; which enlistment shall be absolute and bindings, upon all persons under the age of twenty-one years, as well as upon persons of full age ; such recruiting officer having cornplied with all the requi- sitions of the laws regulating the recruiting service. * * * Sec. 4. And be it further enacted. That in lieu of the bounty of one hundred and sixty acres of land, now allowed by law, there shall be allowed to each non-commissioned officer and soldier hereafter enlisted, when discharged from service, who shall have obtained from the commanding officer of his company, battalion, or regiment, a certificate that he had faithfully performed his duty whilst in service, three hundred and twenty acres of land, to be surveyed, laid ofi", and granted under the same regulations, and in every respect in the same manner now prescribed by law; and the widow and children, and if there be no widow nor child, the parents of every non-commissioned officer and soldier, enlisted according to law, who may be killed or die in the service of the United States, shall be entitled to receive the three hundred and twenty acres of land as aforesaid ; but the same shall not pass to collateral relations, any law heretofore passed to the contrary notwithstanding. Sec. 5. And be it further enacted. That any person subject to militia duty, who shall, according to law, furnish a recruit for the PRINCIPLES AND I'KCISIONS. 203 army of the United States at his own expense, during the war, shall thereafter be exempt from militia duty during the war ; and every recruit thus furnished shall be delivered to some recruiting officer of the United States, who shall immediately grant his receipt for such recruit, to the person furnishing him, and shall forthwith report the same to the Department of War, and shall specify in the report the name of such person, and hrs place of residence, as well as the name and description of the recruit ; whereupon it shall be the duty of the Secretary for the Department of War to grant to the person furnish- ing such recruit a certificate of exemption from militia duty during the war, upon calls made upon authority of the United States, which certificate shall be good and available to all intents and purposes for that object; and every recruit thus furnished shall be entitled to the bounty land, in the same manner, and upon the same conditions as the other recruits in the army of the United States. [Approved, December 10, 1814.] An act making further provision for military services during the late war, and for other purposes. Sec. 3. And he it further enacted, That all soldiers who have been enlisted to serve for five years or during the war, and were above the age of forty-five, or under the age of eighteen years, who have faith- fully served during the late war, and have been regularly discharged, and the representatives of such soldiers as shall have died whilst in the service of the United States, and all soldiers who have been en- listed and have faithfully served during the late war, until they have been promoted to the rank of commissioned officers, who, if they had served during the war under their enlistment, and been regularly dis- charged, would have been entitled to a bounty in land, shall be en- titled to one hundred and sixty or three hundred and twenty acres of land, according to the term of enlistment ; the warrants and pa- tents to issue in the same manner as in the case of soldiers enlisted of proper age, and discharged under similar circumstances. [Approved, April 16, 1816.] PRINCIPLES AND DECISIONS RELATING TO BOUNTY LANDS FOR THE WAR OF 1812. No. 1. Who entitled. I think that every non-commissioned officer and soldier enlisted since the 10th of December, 1814, is entitled to a bounty of 320 acres of land, provided that he obtain, on his discharge from service, a certificate from the commanding officer of his company, battalion, or regiment, that he had faithfully performed his duty whilst in ser- yj(.g_ [Opinion of Attorney-General, August 1, 1815.] Mr. Sterling is an applicant for land bounty, under the 3d section of the act of the 16th of April, 1816, entitled "An act making fur- ther provisions for military services during the late war, and for other 204 BOUNTY LAND LAWS. purposes." He states that he enlisted as a soldier, and served during the late war, until he was promoted to the rank of a commissioned officer, which commission he resigned before the conclusion of the w&'r. And the single question presented by his. case is, whether thst re- signation cuts him off from the bounty provided by the section of the act in question ; or, in other words, whether, to entitle him to the land bounty, he was not bound to have served under Ms eommissien until the end of the war ? In considering the just construction of tbia section, it is observable that it provides for those classes of persons for whom no previous provision has been made, to wit : 1. All soldiers above the age of forty-five, or unfer the age of eighteen, who had been enlisted to serve for,five years or during the war, and who had faithfully served during the war, and had been re- gularly discharged. 2. The representatives of such soldiers as had died whilst in the service of the United States. 3. All soldiers who had been enlisted and had faithfully served during the war until they had been promoted to the rank of commis- sioned officers, who, if they had served during the war under their enlistment and had been regularly discharged, would have been en- titled to a bounty in land. Under this third provision, the only questions in relation to Mr. Sterling are^ 1st. Was his enhstment as & soldier of that character, that if he had served under it during the whole war, and been regularly dis- charged, he could not have been entitled to the land bounty ; i. e. was he enlisted for five years, or during the war ? 2d. Did he serve under that enlistment until he was promoted to the rank of a commissioned officer f If the facts of the case answer both these questions in the affirma- tive, he is, in my opinion, clearly entitled to the bounty under this act. To require that he should have served under his commission till the end of the war, in order to entitle him, is to require what the act of Congress does not require. If Congress intended the service so to continue, they have not said so. Their words are, " all soldiers who have been enlisted and have faithfully served during the late war, until they had been promoted to the rank of commissioned officers." The moment the soldier is so promoted, his right attaches, and he is from that moment placed exactly on the footing of the soldier who had served during the war, a;nd until regularly discharged. Any other construction would render the words " until they had been promoted to the rank of commissioned officers" utterly senseless ; whereas they are obviously used, and used for the express purpose of marking the very epoch and the event on which the right to the bounty was intended to attach. The policy of the law, I presume, was to promote emulation in the ranks, and to reward the successful competitor. [OpinioB of Attorney-General, July 29, 1819.] In reply to your inquiry of this morning, I have the honor to state that, in my opinion, a soldier, who during the late war was enlisted PRINCIPLES AND DECISIONS. 205 to serve for the term of five years, and was honorably discharged before the expiration of his term of service, in consequence of his having provided a substitute, (who, however, afterwards deserted,) is entitled to one hundred and sixty acres of land from the United States, under the act of Congress of January 11, 1812. The United States, in accepting the substitute, receives what they regard as an equivalent for the services of the soldier ; and I do not think that he is responsible for the future conduct of the person thus agreed to be accepted. As soon as he is discharged from service, and obtains the certificate that he has faithfully performed his duty whilst in ser- vice, he becomes entitled to the land ; and no subsequent contingency can destroy his right. [Opinion of Attomey.General, November 4, 1831.] No. 2. Fraud. A warrant obtained by fraud is of no value_ to the holder, and I cannot, therefore, conceive any injury which can result from can- celling it. On the contrary, the fraud being fixed, I consider it the duty of the Secretary, both towards the Government and towards society, to disable the warrant from being used as an instrument of further mischief. But, since the evidence which fixes the fraud must, from the necessity of the case, be always ex parte in relation to the holder of the warrant, whose character as well as rights are staked on the correctness of the Secretary's decision, I submit as the better course to cancel the warrant in such a way as to incapacitate it for circulation, without rendering it illegible ; noting on the warrant, in a few words, the cause of its cancellation, and then handing it back to the person who presented it, to seek any redress to which he may be entitled before the tribunals of his country. [Opinion of Attorney-General, December 26, 1819.] The former warrant and patent were issued to an impostor, who personated the proper claimant. An imposition practised on the department ought not to prejudice an innocent person, who in no way contributed to the wrong done to the public; and I think the son and heir is entitled to a v^arrant for his bounty lands, notwithstanding a warrant and patent have been heretofore fraudulently obtained by another person for the same lands. [Opinion of Attorney -General, March 19, 1832.] No. 3. Bounty land descends and is devisable as real estate. From the statement before me, I think that Thilia Porter, as the heir and devisee of Lieutenant John Thorp, deceased, is entitled to the bounty lands due to him. The case is this : John Thorp, at the time of his death, left issue two daughters, Elizabeth Serring and Thilia Porter, who were his 206 BOUNTY LAND LAWS. heirs-at-law. The two grandsons mentioned in his will were the children of his daughter, Mrs. Serring. The bounty land is not expressly devised to any one, nor is there any express general devise of the residue of his. real estate. And if there had been nothing in the will to exclude Mrs. Serring from a share of the bounty lands, they would have descended equally to his two daughters, who were his heirs-at-law. But the testator directs that the devise of certain real and personal estate made to Mr. and Mrs. Serring should go in full satisfaction of all right, title, interest, claim, and demand, whatsoever, which they might or could in any way pretend to have or claim to all or any part of his real or personal estate, except the bequest of the one- half of the residue of his personal estate, which, by a preceding clause in his will, he had given to her. This strong language of exclusion from everything but the pro- perty aboveraentioned appears to me to be, by necessary implication, a devise to Mrs. Porter, his only remaining heir-at-law, of the share of the residue of hisTeal estate, which, in the absence of this clause of exclusion, would have descended to Mrs. Serring. The bounty .lands, not being devised to any one, would be left to descend to the heirs-at-law. And when the testator gives to one Of his heirs the one-half of the residue of his personal estate, and excludes her in express terms from any share of the residue of his estate, the portion of that heir in the residue of the real estate is, in my opinion, by necessary implication, given to his remaining heir. And Mrs. Porter is therefore entitled to these lands. This opinion is expressed under the belief that the will of Mr. Thorp is sufBciently attested to pass real estate, and that his two daughters, Mrs. Serring and Mrs. Porter, were both living at the time of his death. The officer in charge of the Bounty Land Office will, of course, satisfy himself on these points before he acts on this opinion. [Opinion of Attorney-General, October 25, 1832.] In reply to your letter of to-day, I have the honor to state that it appears, from the papers before me, that Jacob Brice, of Maryland, who was entitled to the bounty land in question, died many years ago, intestate, leaving a widow and three children ; that the children all died intestate and without issue, in the life of the widow ; and she died about the year 1817, intestate, without leaving issue, she not having married again. The present applicants for the land make claim to it as her heirs-at-law. Upon the facts, as set forth in the papers before me, the present applicants do not show themselves entitled to the land. It descended, on the death of Jacob Brice, to his children, and vested by descent in the surviving child. The mother was not the heir of that child, unless there was no representative to be found in the paternal line. And there is no evidence to show that there were not brothers and sisters of Jacob Brice, or some one of kin to him in the paternal line, who was competent to take, upon the death of the surviving child. The claim of the present applicants cannot, therefore, be allowed. [Opinion of Attorney-General, September 5, 1833.] PRINCIPLES AND DECISIONS. 207 No. 4. Lost or omitted discharge. An act providing for cases of lost military land warrants and discharges for faithful services. Sec. 2. And he it further enacted, That in all cases of discharges from the military service of the United States, of any soldier of the regular army, when it shall appear to the satisfaction of the Secre- tary of War that a certificate of faithful services has been omitted by the neglect of the discharging officer, by misconstruction of the law, or by any other neglect or casualty, such omission shall not pre- vent the issuing of the warrant and patent as in other cases. And when it shall be proved as aforesaid that any soldier of the regular army has lost his discharge and certificate of faithful service, the Secretary of War shall cause such paper to be furnished such soldier of the regular army as will entitle him to his land warrant and patent : Provided, Such measure be justified by the time of his en- listment, the period of service, and the report of some officer of the corps to which he was attached. [Approved, April 27, 1816.] No. 5. Free negroes entitled. Had I been called on, d priori, to give a construction to the several acts of Congress which are the subject of Mr. Cutting's letters of the 21st May, 1821, and 30th January, 1823, of Major Charles J. Nourse's of the 20th January, 1823, and Mr. J. W. Murray's of 22d December, 1822, I should have had no hesitation in expressing the opinion that it was not the intention of Congress to incorporate negroes and people of color with the army any more than with the militia of the United States. But the acts of Congress under which this body of people of color are understood to have been raised during the late war uses no other terms of description as to the re- cruits than that they shall be " eff"ective able-bodied men" — [act 24th December, 1811, "for completing the existing military establish- ment," and act 11th January, 1812, "to raise an additional military force,"] or " free, efi'ective able-bodied men," [act December 10, 1814, "making further provision for filling the ranks of the army of the United States"]. As either of these descriptions was satisfied by the persons of color, in question ; as the recruiting officers, who were quoad hoc the agents of the United States, recruited these persons on a contract for the pay and bounty stipulated by law; as the officers of government recognise them as a part of the army, by their regular returns of this corps, who received, till the close of the war, the same pay and rations with other troops, were subject to the same military law, and performed the same military services, it seems to me that a practical construction has been given to the law in this particular, from which it is not in the power of the Government justly to depart. I think, therefore, that they ought to receive the promised land bounty. But without some further and more explicit 208 BOUNTY LAND LAWS. declaration of the purpose of Congress, I would not recommend a repetition of such contracts, on any future occasion, on laws worded like those under consideration — by which I mean not merely the three laws which I have cited, but the whole military system of the United States, militia included. The papers are returned. [Opinion of Attorney-General, March 27, 1828.] DEC3LARATI0N AND REGULATIONS. There is no prescribed form of declaration, and th* applicamt may model his after the -one given under the Revolutionary act, or may govern himself by the following regulations : . The existing laws providing land bounty to the soldiers of the war of 1812 are applicable to those men only who enlisted in the regular armj for "five years," or for "during the war," and were "honor- ably discharged" or died whilst in service. A surviving soldier of the war of 1812, on his application for bounty land, is required to produce his original discharge, and his oath, duly authenticated, showing that he is the individual mentioned in the discharge ; but if the discharge is lost, he must identify himself by his affidavit ac- cording to the printed form for that purpose, headed " Form for Lost Discharges." The heirs of a deceased soldier of the war of 1812, in their appli- cation for bounty land, are required to state as explicitly as practi- eable when and where the soldier enlisted, the name or- number of the regiment to winch he belonged, the name of liis captain, -or tlie names of some ef the other -officers under wliom he served ; for -this latter pur-pose no forms are prescribed. The faets, however, must be set forth under oath, and the affidavits must be duly ^authenticated. The magistrates who may administer the oaths must eertify to the credibility of the witnesses, and the official character and signature of the magistrate must be certified by the proper officer under his seal of office. Heirship must be established by p-roof taken before a court of re- cord according to the laws of the State in which the heirs reside. The forms will direct the clerk of the courts how to draw up their certificates, to which must be attached their official seals. „ , / FORM FOR LOST DISCHARGES. Vounty, I, , do declare that I was late a ., in the company commanded by , of the regiment of ; that I was enlisted at ,, by ,. , on the day of , one thousand eight hundred and , for the term of , and served faithfully, until the , one thousand eight hundred and , when I was honorably dis- charged at , by , on account of , and was last paid by , Paymaster; and my discharge, which duly testified all these particulars, was lost by , Sworn and subscribcM before me., this ., day of , one thousand eight hundred and ,. N. B. The official attestation of the Secretary of the State, or the County Clert, or -.other proper officer, to the quality and signature of the Magistrate before whom the de- positions were taken will be required ; excepting, ho-weyer, when the depositions shall have been made before a Notary Public; hisi^ial attestation in such case is deemed sufficient ; but the certificate of a Notary, to the quality and signature of another Magistrate, is inadmissible. BOUNTY LAND SCRIP — MEXICAN -WAR. 209 No. 3. BOUNTY LAND OR SCRIP FOR NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICERS AND SOLDIERS OF THE REGULAR ARMY AND VOLUNTEERS IN THE WAR WITH MEXICO. An act to raise for a limited time an additional military force, and for other purposes. Sec. 1. Be it enacted ly the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That in addition to the present military establishment of the United States, there shall be raised and organized, under the direction of the Presi- dent, for and during the war with Mexico, one regiment of dragoons and nine regiments of infantry, each to be composed of the same number and rank of commissioned and non-commissioned officers, buglers, musicians, and privates, &c., as are provided for a regiment of dragoons and infantry, respectively, under existing laws, and shall receive the same pay, rations, and allowances according to their respective grades, and be subject to the same regulations, and to the rules and articles of war, &c. Sec. 9. And. be it further enacted, That each non-commissioned officer, musician, or private, enlisted or to be enlisted in the regular army, or regularly mustered in any volunteer company for a period of not less than twelve months, who has served or may serve during the present war with Mexico, and who shall receive an honorable discharge, or who shall have been killed, or died of wounds received or sickness incurred in the course of such service, or who shall have been discharged before the expiration of his term of service in conse- quence of wounds received or sickness incurred in the course of such service, shall be entitled to receive a certificate or warrant from the War Department for the quantity of one hundred and sixty acres, and which may be located by the warrantee, or his heirs at law at any land office of the United States, in one body, and in conformity to the legal subdivisions of the public lands, upon any of the public lands in such district then subject to private entry; and upon the return of such certificate or warrant, with evidence of the location thereof having been legally made, to the General Land Office, a patent shall be issued therefor. That in the event of the death of any such non-commissioned officer, musician, or private, during service, or afte^ his discharge, and before the issuing of a certificate or warrant as aforesaid, the said certificate or warrant shall be issued in favor, and inure to the benefit of his family or relatives, according to the following rules : first, to the widow and to his children ; second, his father ; third, his mother. And in the event of his children being minors, then the legally-constituted guardian of such minor children shall, in conjunction with such of the children, if any, as may be of full age, upon being duly authorized by the Orphans' or other court having probate jurisdiction, have power to sell and dispose of such certificate or warrant for the benefit of those interested. 14 210 BOUNTY LAND LAWS. And all sales, mortgages, powers, or other instruments of writing, going to aflfect .the title or claim to any such bounty right, made or executed prior to the issue of such warrant or certificate, shall be null and void to all intents and purposes whatso|ver, nor shall such claim to bounty right be in any wise affected by, or charged with, or subject to, the payment of any debt or claim incurred by the soldier prior to the issuing of such certificate or warrant : Provided, That no land warrant issued under the provisions of this act sha,ll be laid upon any lands of the United States to which there shall be a pre-emption right, or upon which there shall be an actual settlement and cultiva- tion : Provided^ further, That every such non-commissioned officer, musician, and private, who may be entitled, under the provisions of this act, to receive a certificate or warrant for one hundred and sixty acres of land, shall be allowed the option to receive such certificate or warrant, or a treasury scrip for one hundred dollars ; and such scrip, whenever it is preferred, shall be issued by the Secretary of the Treasury to such person or persons as would be authorized to receive such certificates or warrants for lands ; said scrip to bear an interest of six per cent, per annum, payable semi-annually, redeemable at the pleasure of the government. And that each private, non-commis- sioned officer, and musician, who shall have been received into the service of the United States, since the commencement of the war with Mexico, for less than twelve months, and shall have served for such term or until honorably discharged, shall be entitled to receive a warrant for forty acres of land, which may be subject to private entry, or twenty-five dollars in scrip, if preferred ; and in the event of the death of such volunteer during his term of service, or after an honorable discharge, but before the passage of this act, then the warrant for such land or scrip, shall issue to the wife, child, or chil- dren, if there be any, and, if none, then to the father, and, if there be no father, then to the mother of such deceased volunteer : Pro- vided, That nothing contained in this section shall be construed to give bounty land to such volunteers as were accepted into service, and discharged without being marched to the seat of war. [Approved, February 11, 1847.] An act making land warrants assignable, and for other purposes. Sec. 4. And he it further enacted, * * * * That the last proviso of the ninth section of the act of eleventh of February, eighteen hundred and forty-seven, be and the same is hereby repealed. [Approved, March 22, 1852.J Joint resolution relative to tlie evidence v/bich shall be considered satisfactory in appli- cations for bounty land. Be it resolved hy the Senate and House of Hepresentatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That in all cases of application for bounty land warrants under the act approved Feb- ruary eleventh, eighteen hundred and forty-seven, the honorable discharge of the applicant, showing the same was predicated on a surgeon's certificate of disability, shall be considered as satisfactory BOUNTY LAND FOR MARINES, &C. 211 evidence to the Commissioner of Pensions that the disability was incurred in the course of service. [Approved, March 24, 1848.] An act explanatory of the act entitled "An act to raise, for a limited time, an additional military force, and for other purposes," approved eleventh February, eighteen hundred and forty-seven. Sec. 1. Be it enacted hy the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the term "relatives," as used in the ninth section of the act entitled "An act to raise, for a limited time, an additional military force, and for other purposes," approved 11th February, eighteen hundred and forty- seven, shall be considered as extending to the brothers and sisters of those persons whose services, under that act, may have entitled them to the land therein provided ; the order or priority of right, however, shall remain as declared in that act; and those failing, the right shall accrue, fourthly, to the brother or sister, or in equal proportions to the brothers and sisters of the deceased, as the case may be. Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That the' benefits of the said act of eleventh February, eighteen hundred and forty-seven, shall not be construed as forfeited by the privates and non-commissioned ofiBcers who have been, or may be, promoted to the grade of commissioned officers during their service in Mexico, and who shall have subse- quently fulfilled the condition of their engagements : Provided, Such promotion shall have been made subsequent to the original organiza- tion of the company, corps, or regiment to which such privates and non-commissioned officers may have belonged. [Approved, May 27, 1848.] No. 4. BOUNTY LAND FOE MARINES AND ORDNANCE CORPS, IN THE MEXICAN WAR. Joint resolution concerning certain portions of the marine and ordnance corps. 1. Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the officers, non-commissioned officers, privates, and musicians, of the marine corps, who have served with the army in the war with Mexico, and also the artificers and laborers of the ordnance corps serving in said war, be placed, in all respects as to bounty land and other remunera- tion', in addition to ordinary pay, on a footing with the officers, non- commissioned officers, privates, and musicians of the army : Provided, That this remuneration shall be in lieu of prize-money and all other extra allowances. [Approved, August 10, 1848.] 212 BOUNTY LAND LAWS. PRINCIPLES AND DECISIONS RELATING TO BOUNTY LAND FOR SERVICE IN jMEXICO. No. 1. An election between land and scrip is final. The papers in the case of David Stutsman, which you referred to me on tiie 23d instant, present but a single question, which is : Can a discharged soldier, who is entitled either to a certificate for bounty land or treasury scrip under the act of the 11th February, 1847, after he has made his election of the one, and it has been issued to him, surrender the same, and take the other ? I think not, under the circumstances of this case. It appears that the scrip was regularly issued to Stutsman on the 25th September, 1847, in pursuance of an application in writing pre- viously made and signed by the party and subscribing witness. The evidence that he has exercised the " option " secured to him by the second proviso in the ninth section of the act aforesaid, is full and uncontradicted. This being so, and the Commissioner of Pensions having certified that there was no error in the issuance of the scrip, the law is fully executed, and Stutsman must abide by his own deci- sion in the premises. By that proviso the party has but one election ; and when that is made known, it becomes the duty of the department to conform to it by issuing the proper evidence of the claim, which completes the proceedings. [Opinion of Attorney-General, October 30, 1847.] No. 2. Who is entitled, and what bars. A volunteer was honorably discharged by special order of General Taylor. In the absence of any explanation to the contrary, it is no more than a reasonable inference that the discharge was granted at the request and for the benefit of the party receiving it. The claimant must show that he enlisted, and was regularly mustered into the service, and that he continued in the service for twelve months, and received an honorable discharge, or else that he was discharged on account of wounds received or sickness incurred in the course of his service, before he can claim under the act of 1847. [Opinion of Attorney-General, March 17, 1848.] The explanatory act of May 27, 1848, enacts "that the term ' relatives,' as used in the ninth section of tke ^ct entitled 'An act to raise, for a limited time, an additional military force, and for other purposes,' approved 11th February, 1847, shall be considered as extending to the brothers and sisters of those persons whose services, under that act, may have entitled them to the land therein provided. The order or priority of right, however, shall remain as declared in that act ; and those failing, the right shall accrue, fourthly, to the brother or sister, or in equal proportions to the brothers and sistens PRINCIPLES AND DECISIONS. 213 of the deceased, as the case may be. Thomas J. Luxen, entitled to bounty land, died, leaving a brother of the whole-blood and a sister of the half-blood, they being children of the same mother. The question is, whether the children of the same mother, but not of the same father, are brothers and sisters within the meaning of this act of Congress ? There is no question here of the descent of ancestral estate. The land, or the money in its stead, is not given to the " heir," which might have created greater doubt ; but it is given to the brothers and sisters ; and if the half-sister was the sister of the deceased, she is within the description of the persons entitled to take. It cannot be said that she is not a sister ; and as the act makes no distinction between the whole-blood and half-blood, she cannot be excluded upon any ground contained in the law itself, and from the nature of the case, the policy of no one or more States can apply here ; and there is no general principle of law or policy that can be permitted to vary or control the construction of this section of the act, but the plain import of the words must prevail. I think, there- fore, that the sister of the half-blood is entitled to a share. The claim of John Hasson, late a sergeant in the general recruiting service, to the benefit of the bounty land provided by the 9th section of the act of the 4th February, 1847 {Session acts, p. 14), submitted by you to this oflSce, I have carefully considered. It rests altogether upon what is the proper construction of that section. The facts are these : The claimant was enlisted on the 29th January, 1846, and on the 14th April, 1849, honorably discharged. The discharge was made against his wish, and in consequence of the reduction of the army after the termination of the Mexican war. The term of his enlistment was five years. The Pension Office thinks the claim unfounded, and has so decided. Its interpretation of the section is, that it embraces only those who served out their full term, or were prevented in consequence of wounds, disabilities, or death. I construe it differently. In my opinion, it embraces three classes: 1st. Those of the regular army enlisted for twelve months or for a longer period ; volunteers regularly mustered into a volunteer com- pany, " who have served, or may serve, during " the war with 3fexico, and are then, at the end of the war, honorably discharged. 2d. Those killed, or dying of wounds received or sickness incurred, "in the course oi such service." 3d. Those who are discharged before the expiration of their term of service, " in consequence of wounds received or sickness incurred in the course of such service." The first class need only to serve during the war, and to be hono- rably discharged at its termination, to entitle them to bounty. It is not necessary to show service in the army for the whole period of the enlistment. The second : death from wounds or sickness received or incurred during service in the war, and not during the terni of enlist- ment, when that extends beyond the close of the war. Third : those who, by reason of wounds or sickness occurring in the war, are dis- charged before the close of the war. 214 BOUNTT LAND LAWS. The view taken by the Pension Office is, that the express provision for this latter class shows that the terms " and who shall receive an honorable discharge," applicable to the first class, were not meant to embrace any other such discharge than one granted after the full period of enlistment had been served out. This construction evidently renders it necessary to add to that part of the section these words : " at the expiration of his term of service." The terms actually used neither imply nor justify such an addition. They are, in themselves, perfectly clear. A non-commissioned officer, &c., enlisted in the regular army, or such a volunteer as is described mustering in a volunteer company, and serving during the war, not during the period of enlistmeut, and then honorably discharged, is to receive the bounty. The words necessary to be superadded by the construction in question manifestly changes the entire sense of the language used : nor is such an interpretation called for by the object of the provision. That evidently was to hold out an incentive to faithful and gallant service during the war. It did not look to service during a state of peace. The increased peril of a war service, and the increased occasion it furnished for skill and daring, gave rise to the bounty. This being so, it would seem strange that the soldier who so served during the very exigency, and that ceasing, was hono- rably discharged, should not be entitled to the very benefit designed to meet it. The express provision for the third class, upon which the other view rests, is susceptible, I think, of a mear^ing perfectly con- sistent with the one I give to the provision for the first class. It is this : That it includes those who are discharged before the end of the war, and the termination of the enlistment, in consequence of wounds or sickness happening during the war. In my opinion, the words "in course of such service," applying to the second and third classes, are equivalent with the words applicable to the first class, "who has served, or may serve, during the present war." The service meant is not a service commensurate with the term of enlistment, but -with the continuance of the war, wholly irre- spective of the term of enlistment. The words relied upon by the Pension Office for its decision, in my opinion, therefore, mean this : A discharge during the war, prior to the expiration of enlistment, in consequence of wounds or sickness occurring during the war. So far from qualifying, by limiting, the antecedent provision for the first class, they embrace another which would not have been otherwise provided for. Under the first, an honorable discharge at the end of the war is required. Under this, a discharge during the war, and before its end, in consequence bf w^ounds, &c., is sufficient. But there is another ground in ray judgment sufficient to sustain the claim. The objection is not that the claimant did not serve during the war, and was not afterwards honorably discharged, but that he did not serve out his term of enlistment. The enlistment being on the 29th of January, 1846, was, under the law as it then stood, for a term of five years. But the act of the 13th of May, 1846, {Session acts, p. 16,) authorized the President to increase the army by in- creasing each company to one hundred privates, and the enlistments PRINCIPLES AND DECISIONS. 215 to he made for the purpose are to " be for the term of five years and no longer, unless sooner disbanded by the President" The increase was to be made when the President thought "the exigencies of the pubhc service" required it, and he was to reduce it when such exigen- cies ceased. Under this power, when the war ended, the reduction was made ; and in making it, as he clearly had the right to do, he caused to be discharged some of those who were enlisted before May, 1846, as well as some who were afterwards enlisted. The claimant was among the former. The power to reduce was thought to be (and I think properly) independent of the character of the enlistment. The effect clearly was, to place those enhsted prior to the act of 1846 and those enlisted under that act upon the same footing as those enlisted after, as far as a discharge before the expiration of the term of enlistment was concerned. The consequence of this clearly was, to make the enlistment of both classes to be for five years, " unless sooner dis- banded by the President." The latter qualification was, by the act of 1846, made as much a part of the antecedent enlistments as of those it authorized. This being the case, it is, in my opinion, per- fectly clear that the present claimant, having been discharged under the reduction provided for by that act, and such discharge having been an honorable one, is entitled to the benefit of the act of 1847, even conceding the view of the Pension Office to be right, that the terms "and who shall receive an honorable discharge," found in the first part of the 9th section of the act, mean only a discharge at the end of the enlisted term, if he was so discharged. His term of ser- vice after the act of 1846 was five years, unless sooner disbanded by the President. If so disbanded, that was the expiration of his term of enlistment. But, in addition to all this, unless the words of the law admitted of no other meaning, would it be just to Congress to give them that interpretation ? The nation was then at war, and the purpose was, because of the war, to encourage enlistments and good conduct in the army. This is done by the incentive of the promised bounty. The soldier is told : enlist, serve during the war, and be honorably discharged, and the bounty is yours. The pledge of the public faith is apparently complete. Now, if the construction of the Pension Office is the sound one, is it not clear that this pledge is but a false and deceitful instead of a fair one ? Service, says the office, during the entire term of enlistment, is necessary, unless a prior dis- charge is caused by wounds or sickness. Before the term expires, then, (which may well happen, and in the present instance did hap- pen,) Congress may direct or authorize the disbanding the army. Is it possible, in that event, the soldier having fully complied up to his discharge with his part of the engagement, and been prevented against his will and by the act of the government from complying throughout, that he is not to be entitled to demand compliance on the part of the government ? Every principle of justice and fair dealing is on the side of such a demand, and it cannot be that Con- gress designed to deny it. Upon the whole, then, I am of opinion that the claim of Hasson should be allowed. [Opinion of Attorney-General, July 27, 1849.] 216 BOUNTY LAND LAWS. A soldier discharged in consequence of a disease he was laboring under when he enlisted, is not entitled to land bounty. [Secretary of the laterior, June 2, 1849.] A volunteer not mustered into service with his company, but re- gularly mustered out with it, is entitled. [Secretary of the Interior, November 12, 1849.] It appears that the act of March 16, 1802, gives a pension to the soldier " who shall be disabled by wounds, or otherwise, while in the line of his duty in public service." The act of February 11, 1847, giving bounty land to soldiers, does not follow the language of the above act. It gives the bounty land to soldiers who, having served to the end of the war, shall receive an honorable discharge, or who may be discharged in consequence of wounds received " in the course of such service, or to the heirs of such as shall have been killed, or died of wounds received, or sickness incurred in the course of such service," omitting the restrictive words "in the line of his duty." This change of phraseology cannot be presumed to be accidental. It was doubtless intended to save all inquiry as to the manner in which wounds were received, diseases contracted, or 'death occasioned, provided it was in the course of the service — that is, while the sol- dier was in the service and subject to duty. This construction is the more reasonable as it is for the enlistment and service, and not for the wounds, disease, or death that the bounty is given. The soldier undertopk on his part to serve to the end of the war, if he were able to do so, and the Government undertook to give him the bounty land if he so served, and if he became unable to serve by reason of wounds received, disease incuried, or if he shall be killed in the course of his service. This soldier had served through the war ; he had earned his land, was waiting for his discharge when he was killed in an affray. His death rendered his discharge impossible, and it is a substitute for it. His heirs, on full proof, are entitled to the bounty land. [Secretary of the Interior; February 28, 1850.] The claimant was discharged at Monterey by General Taylor, but no cause for his being discharged is assigned in his certificate of dis- charge, The rolls show that he was " discharged by order of General Taylor." He has made an affidavit in which he states 'that he was discharged in consequence of sickness incurred in the service. It appears to me that inasmuch as there is no record proof of the fact, he should prove it by other testimony than his own affidavit. He has been advised by the Pension Office, that if he would prove by a commis- sioned officer that he was discharged in consequence of disease con- tracted in the service, his claim would be allowed. He swears that he has made diligent search for his commissioned officers, and is un- able to ascertain the residences of either of them. I am^ therefore of the opinion that the evidence now on file should be held insufficient to establish the claitn, but that he should be in- PRINCIPLES AND DECISIONS. 217 formed that the facts necessary to make out the case may be proved by credible persons, though not commissioned officers. [Secretary of the Interior, March 9, 1850.] I have examined the papers in the case of Charles Krohne, who was a private in the 1st regiment U. S. dragoons. It appears that said Krohne was enlisted on the 30th November, 1844, for five years, and was honorably discharged the 9th May, 1847, by reason of having received a commission as 2d lieutenant in Captain Korponay's company mounted volunteers, from the Governor of Mississippi. The records of the Adjutant-General's office show that Krohne was mustered into service a« 2d lieutenant, 21st May, 1847, and mustered out of service 13th October, 1848. The 9th section of the act of February 11, 1847, says " that each non-commissioned officer, musician, or private enlisted, or to be en- listed in the regular army, or regularly mustered in any volunteer company for a period of not less than twelve months, who has served or may serve during the present war with Mexico, and who shall re- ceive an honorable discharge, shall be entitled to receive a certificate or warrant from the War Department for the quantity of 160 acres." The applicant comes within the letter of the law. He enlisted for more than 12 months ; he served to the end of the war, and was honorably discharged ; and I do not think he is excluded by the spirit and meaning of the act. He rendered as effectual service to the last as if he had remained in the ranks ; and that good conduct and efficiency which induced promotion ought not to deprive the en- listed soldier of his bounty. The papers are herewith returned. [Secretary of the Interior, March 28, 1850.] I herewith return the papers in the case of James Thompson, pri- vate in the company of Captain Gillespie, 1st regiment of Texas mounted volunteers, and I am of the opinion that his land bounty should be allowed, as sickness, and his being in the hospital in Ca- margo, was the reason why he was not mustered into the service with the other members of his company. [Secretary of the Interior, July 1, 1850.] Volunteers under the act of May 18, 1846, who were mustered into service and went wherever their services were required, whether to Mexico, Florida, or elsewhere, are entitled under the act of 1847. [Secretary of War, December 22, 1847.] A soldier furloughed to act as a wagoner, and continuing so to act until his discharge, is entitled. [Secretary of War, June 29, 1847.] A soldier who left Mexico with his company, but was discharged on reaching New Orleans a few days before the expiration of his time, is entitled. [Secretary of War, April 24, 1848.] A rejected recruit has no claim to bounty land. [Secretary of War, January 6, 1849.] 218 BOUNTY LAND LAWS. A soldier discharged before his terra expires, in order that he may re-enlist, is entitled. [Secretary of War, July 24, 1847.] A company raised for twelve months, stationed in Iowa, but dis- charged before the expiration of the period for which it was enlisted, on the recommendation of a general officer, is entitled. [Secretary of War, February 7, 1849.] A party discharged on account of syphilis, is entitled under the act of 1847, as explained by that- of the 24th March, 1848. [Secretary of War, April 3, 1848.] Volunteers mustered in for 12 months, but discharged before that period had elapsed, are entitled. [Secretary o" "'.,>; May 13, 1847] A soldier served to the end of the Mexican war, and was then dis- charged at the request of his friends ; though his term of enlistment had not expired, he received his bounty land. [Secretary of the Interior, case of S. Reese.] It is not necessary for the heirs to show that the death occurred from wounds received or sickness incurred in the line of duty, to entitle them under this act. [Secretary of the Interior, case of J. F. Talbert.] Clerks employed in the Quartermaster's Department in Mexico are not entitled, unless they were regularly mustered into service. [Secretary of the Interior, case of A. C. Wakcman.] One enlisted after the 30th May, 1848, which was the close of the Mexican war, is not entitled. [Secretary of the Interior, case of R. E. Kelly.] I have considered the question submitted by you to this office, as to what is the proper construction of the joint resolution of the 10th of August, 1848, [Session acts, p. 225,) making certain provision for the officers, &c., of the marine corps " who have served with the army in the war with Mexico." * Two battalions of the corps, under the separate commands of Lieutenant-Colonel Watson and Major Harris, were, as you inform me, " detached from the navy, and transferred pro tempore to the army," to serve with it, under Major-General Scott's command, in the war. That these are entitled to the benefit of the resolution, is considered by you, and properly, " as clear and indisputable ;" but the doubt is, whether any other part of the corps is entitled ? Upon this point, my opinion is decisive. With all proper deference to the judgment of my predecessor in the department, who, as I understand, gave the resolution that limited construction upon which as yet it has been executed, my opinion is that such construction is neither con- sistent with its spirit nor language. The interpretation I give to it is, that all the officers, non-commissioned officers, privates, and musi- cians of the corps who belonged to the vessels of the United States despatched to the Mexican coast, to aid in subduing the cities and PRINCIPLES AND DECISIONS. 219 ports of the enemy, and conquering the country, and who were there for the purpose, are equally embraced by the resolution with the particular detachments under Lieutenant-Colonel Watson and Major Harris. All that is necessary to bring any portion of the corps within the scope of the provision is, that they should have "served with the army in the war with Mexico." Whether such service was on the land, or on the water, if it was rendered in connexion or association with the army, and to efiFect a common end — victory over, and con- quest of, the enemy — it w8,s serving "with the army in the war." The resolution prescribes no particular theatre of service. It is couched in general terms. Neither land nor ocean is, in any way, in words referred to. It is service generally, anywhere, and in any mode, during the war, in union with the army, that is intended to be nrovided for. [Opinion of Attorney-General, September 17, 1849.] A soldier died entitled to bounty land, leaving a mother, who did not receive it during her life'; her heirs are entitled. [Secretary of War, March 24, 1848.] The soldier who first enlisted, and not any substitute he may em- ploy to serve out his term, is entitled. ^ ■ [Secretary of War, November 3, 1848.] No. 3. Devise. Right to bounty^and is not devisable under this act. [Opinion of Attorney-General, June 28, 1850.] No. 4. Fraud. The person legally entitled is not to lose his warrant because an- other has fraudulently obtained one upon the same service. [Secretary of the Interior, May 16, 1849, and March IG, 1850.] No. 5. Evidence of the term of enlistment. The rolls show that a soldier enlisted for five years, he is dis- charged, on writ of habeas corpus, by a civil court, on the ground that he enlisted only for the war; the rolls must govern, and the soldier loses his land warrant. [Secretary of War, November 13, 1848.] Where the rolls show an enlistment for five years, but the soldier is discharged on A«Seas corpws on the ground that he enlisted only for the war, the judicial opinion is to govern, unless fraud be shown, and the party is entitled to his land. ^ •' [Secretary of the Interior, August 18, 1849.] 220 BOUNTY LAND LAWS. No. 6. Meissue of an assigned land warrant. In reply to the inquiry contained in your letter of the 21st instant, I have the honor to state that the instructions from this department, dated the 25th ultimo, " are intended to apply to cases where the certificates, after heing assigned, have been lost in their transmission by mail from one pfece to another." The duplicate certificate would, as a matter of course, issue to the party to whom the original was issued, and be delivered to the per- son claiming to be the assignee, after he had in the usual manner before court established the execution of the last assignment. [Secretary of the Interior, March 23, 1850.] I am of the opinion that if you are fully satisfied of the loss of the certificates in the mail, you may issue duplicates and deliver to the person entitled to the possession of the originals. As to the assignments transferring the property, you can take no notice of them, no matter what the proof may be. The transfer of the title where the assignment is lost is a matter to be settled in a court of justice, and a decree in chancery may be obtained either before or after the issuing of the duplicate certificates, which will settle the title between the parties. [Secretary of the Interior.] No. 7. Commencement of the Mexican war. The war with Mexico commenced on the 24th April, 1846. [Secretary of the Interior, June 10, 1850.] No. 8. A warrant for each service. If a soldier performed two or more tours of duty, during the Mexican war, he shall receive a warrant for each service. [Secretary of War, July 21, 1847.] FORM OF APPLICATION AND REGULATIONS Stateof County of On this day of ...., in the year one thousand eight hundred and , personally appeared before me, the undersigned, a Justice of the Peace for the county and , abovementioned, ....,,.,, who, being duly sworn according to law, declares that he is the identical , who was a in the company commanded by Captain , in the regiment commanded by , that he enlisted on the day of , for the term of , and was discharged at , on the day of , by reason of Sworn to and subscribed before me, the day and year above written. PRINCIPLES AND DECISIONS. 221 The discharge of the soldier, if he has one, must always accompany his declaration. It is proper to state, for the information of claimants under the 9th section of the act of February 11, 1847, that, in every instance in -which a volunteer soldier was discharged on a surgeon's certificate, that paper must be sent to the Pension Office with the claimant's affidavit, unless it has been otherwise disposed of. If lost, he should state the fact, under oath. The official character and signature of the magistrate who may administer an oath must be certified by the proper officer, under his seal of office. The certificate must accompany every case, and be attached to the paper on which the affidavit is written. No affidavit taken before a notary public can be admitted as evidence, except in the States of New Hampshire, Connecticut, Virginia, South Caro- lina, Wisconsin, and Indiana, in which States laws have passed giving such officers power to administer oaths for general purposes. The relinquishment of the right to bounty land must be signed by the claimant, if he wishes to receive scrip in lieu of land, and the relinquishment must be witnessed by some one who writes a legible hand. Volunteers in some cases have been discharged from the service without ever having received a certificate to that eifect from the officer who discharged them. Such cases have occurred where an entire regiment has been mustered out of the service. In such a case the claimant must make the oath of identity required by the regulations, and add to the statement as to his service the following words: "I never received any discharge. The regiment to which I belonged was mustered out of the service." No assignment of land or scrip can be made until after a land warrant has been issued from the Pension Office, or a certificate of scrip, as the case may be. As there wer-e some six months' volunteers, who did not march to the seat of war, it is indispensably necessary that every soldier who was so engaged, should produce the certificate of the commanding officer of the regiment, or company, to which he belonged, showing that he was at the seat of war. The post to which the soldier marched should be mentioned. For the purpose of preventing the numerous frauds that are daily attempted upon this office, the following rules, having been approved by the Secretary of the Interior, will be strictly enforced : In all applications for pensions, renewals of pensions, and for bounty land, the signature of the applicant must be attested, and his or her personal identity established by the affid:ivits of two witnesses, whose residences must be given, and whose credibility must be sus- tained by the certificate of the court or magistrate before whom the application is verified. No certificate of facts found by any court will be deemed sufficient in any case, unless the facts are certified to be within the personal knowledge of the Judge who shall sign the certificate ; or the names 222 BOUNTY LAND LAWS. and places of residence of the witnesses by whom tli,; fi^t.-^ ■i"'" established be given ; or their affidavits, properly authenticated, be appended to the certificate. INSTRUCTIONS AND FORMS To be observed by persons applying to the Pension OfBce for Bounty Land, under the acts of February 11, 1847, and May 27, 1848, or for money in lieu of land under the act of March 3, 1849. Every person applying for bounty land, or money in lieu thereof, must send his discharge to the Pension Office, if he over recciveii one, and has it in his power to send it. If his discharge has been lost (ir destroyed, he must swear to the fact of its loss or destruction. If discharged on surgeon's certificate of disability, that certificate must be sent with the discharge, unless it has been otherwise disposed of; in which case it must be shown how it has been disposed of. Volunteers in some cases have been discharged from the service without ever having received a certificate to that effect from the officer who discharged them. Such cases have occurred where an entire regiment has been HQustered out of the service. In such a case the claimant must make the oath of identity required by the regulations, and add to the statement as to his service the following words : " I never received any discharge. The regiment to which I belonged was mustered out of the service." In case the claimant should desire money instead of land, he must make his request in writing, according to the following form, and he must sign it, and the same must be witnessed by some one who writes a legible hand : Sir : I request that my claim to bounty land, under the 9th section of the act of the 11th of February, 1847, entitled "An act to raise for a limited time an additional military force, and for other pur- poses," may be examined; and if I am entitled to land, I wish to relinquish, and do hereby relinquish, my right thereto, and in lieu thereof to receive one hundred dollars, [or twenty-five dollars, as the case may be.] I am, respectfully, your obedient servant, To THE Commissioner of Pensions, Washington City. No copy of a discharge, or any other pape;r, can be admitted as evidence, unless the original be on file in some public office ; in which case a duly certified copy from the office where the original is on file must be produced. Every applicant for bounty land or scrip must swear to a declara- tion, before an officer duly a,uthorized to administer oaths for general purposes, according to the following form : FOR EXCEPTED OFFICERS AND SOLDIERS, &C. 223 State of County of *^" "''^ day of , in the year one thousand eight hundred and •■• ' personally appeared before me, the undersigned, a Justice of the Peace for the county and abovementioned , who being duly sworn accord- ing to law, declares tliat he is the identical who was a in the company commanded by Captain , in the regiment com- manded by ; that he enlisted on the day of , for the *erm of , and was discharged at , on the day of , by reason of Sworn to and subscribed before me, the day and year above written. The following description of persons are not entitled to land or money in lieu thereof : 1. Those who are discharged on account of disability not incurred while in the service. 2. Those who deserted. 3. Those who were not honorably discharged. 4. Those who were discharged at their own request. 5. Rejected recruits, or persons who were not fit for service when they enlisted. No. 5. BOUNTY LANDS FOR ALL OFFICERS AND SOLDIERS NOT INCLUDED IN THE PRE- CEDING LAWS, WEO SERVED IN ANT WAR SINCE 1790, AND THE "WIDOWS AND MINOR CHILDREN OF THE DECEASED. An act granting bounty land to certain officers and soldiers who have been engaged in the military service of the United States. Sec. 1. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of Ainerica in Congress asseonhled, That each of the surviving, or the widow or minor children of deceased commis- sioned and non-commissioned officers, musicians, or privates, whether of regulars, volunteers, rangers, or militia, who performed military service in any regiment, company, or detachment, in the service of the United States, in the war with Great Britain, declared by the United States on the eighteenth day of June, eighteen hundred and twelve, or in any of the Indian wars since seventeen hundred and ninety, and each of the commissioned officers who were engaged in the military service of the United States in the late war with Mexico, shall be entitled to lands, as follows : Those who engaged to serve twelve months or during the war, and actually served nine months, shall receive one hundred and sixty acres, and those who engaged to serve six months, and actually served four months, shall receive eighty acres, and those who engaged to serve for any or an indefinite period, and actually served one month, shall receive forty acres: Provided, That wherever any officer or soldier was honorably dis-« charged in consequence of disability in the service, before the expira- tion of Jjis period of service, he shall receive the amount to which he would nave been entitled if he had served the full period for which 224 BOITNTY LANDS. he had engaged to serve : Provided, The person so having heen in service shall not receive said land, or any part thereof, if it shall appear, by the muster rolls of his regiment or corps, that he deserted, or was dishonorably discharged from service, or if h-e has received, or is entitled to, any military land bounty under any a(jt of Congress h^etofore passed. Sec. 2. And he it further enacted. That the period during -which any officer or soldier may have remained in captivity with the enemy shall be estimated and added to the period of his actual service, and the person so detained in captivity shall receive land under the pro- visions of this act in the same manner that he would be entitled in case he had enter€d the service for the whole term made up by the addition of the time of his captivity, and had served during such time. Sec. 3. And he it further enacted. That each commissioned and non-commissioned officer, musician, or private, for whom provision is made by the first section hereof, shall receive a certificate or warrant from the Department of the Interior for the quantity of land to which he may be entitled, and which may be located by the warrantee or his heirs-at-law, at any land-office of the United States, in one body and in conformity to the legal subdivisions of the public lands, upon any of the public lands in such district then subject to private entry ; and upon the return of such certificate or warrant, with evidence of the location thereof having been legally made to tlie General Land Office, a patent shall be issued therefor. In the event of the death of any commissioned or non-commissioned officer, musician, or private, prior or subsequent to the passage of this act, who shall have served as aforesaid, and who shall not have received bounty land for said services, a like certificate or warrant shall be issued in favor, and enure to the benefit of his widow, who shall receive one hundred and sixty acres of land in case her husband was killed in battle, but not to her heirs : Provided, She is unmarried at the date of her applica- tion : Provided further, That no land warrant issued under the pro- visions of this act shall be laid upon any land of the United States to which there shall be a pre-emption right, or upon which there shall be an actual settlement and cultivation, except with the consent of such settler, to be satisfactorily proven to the proper land officer. Sec. 4. And he it fwther enacted. That all sales, mortgages, let- ters of attorney, or other instruments of writing, going to aflect tlie title or cla,im to any warrant or certificate issued, or to be issued, or any land granted, or to be granted, under the provisions of this act, made or executed prior to the issue, shall be null and void to all intents and purposes whatsoever ; nor shall such certificate or war- rant, or the land obtained thereby, be in any wise affected by, or charged with, or subject to, the payment of any debt or claim incurred by such officer or soldier, prior to the issuing of the patent : Provided, That the benefits of this act shall not accrue to any person who is a member of the present Congress: Provided further^ That it shall be the duty of the Commissioner of the General Land Office, under such regulations as may be prescribed by the Secretary of the Interior, to DECISIONS UNDER THE ACT OF SEPTEMBER 28, 1850. .225 cause to be located, free of expense, any warrant -whicli the holder may transmit to the General Land Office for that purpose, in such State and land district as the said holder or warrantee may designate, and upon good farming land, so far as the same can be ascertained from the maps, plats, and field-notes of the surveyor, or from any other information in the possession of the local office, and, upon the location being made as aforesaid, the Secretary shall cause a patent to be transmitted to such warrantee : And provided further, That no patent issued under this act shall be delivered upon any power of attorney or agreement dated before the passage of this act, and that all such powers of attorney or agreements be considered and treated as null and void. [Approved, September 28, 1850.] An act making land warrants assignable, and for other purposes Sec. 5. And he it further enacted, That where any company, battalion, or regiment, in an organized form, marched more than twenty miles to the place where they were mustered into the service of the United States, or were discharged more than twenty miles from the place where such company, battalion, or regiment was organized ; in all such cases, in computing the length of service of the officers and soldiers of any such company, battalion, or regiment, with a view to determine the quantity of land any officer or soldier is entitled to under said act, approved 28th of September, 1850, there shall be allowed one day for every twenty miles from the place where the company, battalion, or regiment was organized, to the place where the same was mustered into the service of the United States ; and also one day for every twenty miles from the place where such com- pany, battalion, or regiment was discharged, to the place where it was organized, and from whence it marched, to enter the service. [Approved, March 22, 1852.] DECISIONS UNDER THE ACT OF SEPTEMBER 28, 1850. No. 1. Marines entitled. I have to inform you that where any portion of the marine corps in the several wars referred to in the act of the 28th September, 1850, were embodied with the army in the field, and performed service as a portion of the line of the army, they are entitled to the benefit of the aforesaid act. [Secretary of the Interior, October 12, 1850.] No. 2. One person can receive only one warrant. It has also been decided, that although not expressly provided by the terms of the law, yet its tenor throughout contemplates that the same person shall not receive more than one warrant, although he may have performed service which, if rendered by several individuals, would entitle each to a warrant. [Secretary of the Interior, October 12, 1850,] 15 226 BOUNTT LANDS. If a soldier served longer than is sufficient to entitle him to forty acres, he may agglomerate all the time of his several services, and receive a land warrant for the aggregate. N"o. 3. What widows entitled. The second marriage of the widow deprives her of the benefit of the act, unless she was a widow at the time of the passage of the law, and of her application for the land bounty. [Secretary of the Interior, Oetdber 26, 1850.] The present Secretary of the Interior has decided that if the widow of the soldier remarried after his death, she can claim nothing for his services, though a widow when applying. No. 4. Who not entitled. Troops called out by a proclamation of the President of the United States, but not mustered into service, are not entitled. [Secretary of the Interior, February 3, 1851.} The Winnebago disturbances in 1827, did not amount to sucb a state of war as to authorize bounty land to the soldiers engaged in their suppression. [Secretary of the Interior, May 23, 1863.] Widows of soldiers who themselves received bounty land for ser- vices in the war of 1812 are not entitled. [Case of Maiy Ballard, decided November 10, 1853.] No. 5. Warrant issued after the soldier's death. A warrant which issues after the death of the soldier in whose name it is granted, should be cancelled. If he left a widow, a new one will issue to her ; if no widow, then to his minor children ; if neither widow nor minor child, the warrant lapses to the government. [Secretary of the Interior, December 27, 1851.] No. 6.' Evidence of Desertion. If a soldier be returned on the rolls as a deserter, this charge can- not be obviated by parole proof. [Secretary of the Interior, case of Adam Carver, June 23, 1853.] If the charge be unfounded, the party should satisfy the War Department of that fact, and the rolls being corrected there, the Pension Office will grant the bounty land. No. 7. Captivity. The time a soldier was in captivity will be computed as part of his service, but not that while he was on parole. [Secretary of the Interior, case of R. E. Kelly, March 16, 1852.] DECLARATION AKD REGULATIONS. 227 No. 8. Minors. No child can claim as a minor under this act unless such as con- tinues to be a minor at the date of the warrant. [Secretary of the Interior, May 30,1853.] No. 9. Substitutes. The substitute, and not the employer, is entitled. [Secretary of the Interior.] FORM OF DECLARATION AND REGULATIONS. In every application for the benefit of this act, whether made by the surviving officer or soldier himself, or by his widow or minor child or children, a declaration, under oath, must be made as nearly ac- cording to the following forms as the nature. of the case will admit. In such declaration the signature of the applicant must be attested, and his or her personal identity established by the affidavits of two witnesses, whose residences must be given, and whose credibility must be sustained by the certificate of the magistrate before whom the application is verified. No certificate of facts will be deemed sufficient in any case, unless the facts are certified to be within the personal knowledge of the magistrate or other officer who shall sign the certificate ; or the names and places of residence of the witnesses by whom the facts are estab- lished be given, and their affidavits, properly authenticated, be ap- pended to the certificate. The official character and signature of the magistrate who may administer the oath must be certified by the clerk of the proper court of record of his county, under the seal of the court, and a certificate to that efiiect must accompany every case. In every instance where the certificate of the certifying officer who authenticates the paper is not written on the same sheet of paper which contains the affidavit or other papers authenticated, the certifi- cate must be attached thereto by a piece of tape or narrow ribbon, the ends of which must pass under the official seal, so as to prevent any paper from being improperly attached to the certificate. As the act of 1850 grants bounty land to " each of the surviving, or the widow or minor children of deceased commissioned and non- commissioned officers, musicians, and privates," those applying for this bounty upon services rendered in any other capacity must fur- nish satisfactory proof that they were regularly detailed from the line for that particular purpose ; and members of the marine corps must have served with the army in the field, in the several wars re- ferred to in the act of 1850, as a portion of the army, in order to give them the benefits of the act. 228 BOUNTY LANDS. When the name of a person on whose service a claim is asserted is not found on the rolls of the company designated, or of some other company of the same regiment or corps, the testimony of persons who were in a situation to know the facts about which they testify will be received to prove the service ; but in no case will any testi- mony be allowed to vary or discredit the length of service shown by the rolls. When no rolls of a company in which service is alleged to have been rendered are found in the files of the proper department, satis- factory proof of payment for such service by the United Stages will be required ; and in that case the positive testimony of at least two witnesses who have received bounty land for the same service, or who were in a position to know the facts about which they testify, will be required to establish the service of the claimant. Where a party dies hefore the issue of his land warrant under the act of 28th September, 1850, the right to it dies with him, unless there be a widow, or children who are minors at the time of the issue of the land warrant. If he left a widow, the application may be renewed in her name ; or if none, then in the names of such minor children. If there be neither widow nor minor children, no right vests in any one. If the claimant die after the issue of the warrant, the title thereto vests in the heirs in the same manner as real estate, and can be as- signed only by those who could convey a tract of land descended from the ancestor. Where the service has been rendered by a substitute, he is the person entitled to the benefit of the law, and not his employer ; and where his name does not appear on the rolls as such, an affidavit to that effect of the person who employed him should be furnished. FORM OF A DECLARATION TO BE MADE BY THE SURVIVING OFFICER OR SOLDIER. State OF , \^^ County of , ^ On this day of , A. D. one thousand eight hundred and , personally appeared before me, a Justice of the Peace, (or other officer authorized to administer oaths for general purposes,) within and for the county and State aforesaid, , aged years, a resident of , in the State of , who, being duly sworn according to law, declares that he is the iden- tical who was a in the company(o) commanded by Captain , in the regiment of , commanded by , in the war with Great Britain,'declared by the United States on the 18th day of June, 1812, (or other war embraced in said act, describing what war;) that he enlisted {or volunteered, or was drafted) at , on or about the day of A. D , for the term of , and continued in actual service in said war for the term of , and was honorably discharged at , on the day of , A. D (b) (o) If the claimant was a regimental or staff ofKoer, the declaration must be varied according to the facts of the case. (6) If the claimant was discharged in consequence of disability incurred by the ser- vice, or if he was in captivity with the enemy, he hiust vary his declaration so as to set forth the facts of the case. FORM OF DECLARATION BY A WIDOW. 229 .♦'"V-^t^i.''"" *° ^^^ service above described, he claims for miles, from at Which he was enrolled, to , where he was mustered into service, and for miies, trom .. at which he was discharged, to the said place of his enrolment. „ "\™* f-^,' J ^ '*''^''°" ^°' "'^ purpose of obtaining the bounty land to which he may ne entiUed under the "act granting bounty land to certain officers and soldiers lS«l"'^w engaged in the military service of the United States," passed September 28th, loou. Me also declares that he has not received a warrant for bounty land under this or any other act of Congress, nor made any other application therefor, {Signature of the claimant.) State of i City {or toum) of Jgg. County of ^ Personally came and , residents of the (county, city, or town,) persons whom I certify to be respectable and entitled to credit, and who, being duly sworn, say, that they were present and saw make his mark (or sign his name) to the foregoing declaration ; and they further swear that they have every reason to believe, from the appearance of the applicant, that he is the identical person he represents himself to be ; and that they, deponents, do reside in the (county, city or town) aforesaid. {Signature of loitnestes;) Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of (Signature of Justice, or other officer.) FORM OF A DECLARATION TO BE MADE BY THE WIDOW OF A DECEASED OFFICER OR SOLDIER. State OF , ^ County of , ^ On this day of , A. D. one thousand eight hundred and , personally appeared before me, a Justice of Ihe Peace, (or other officer authorized to ad- minister oaths for general purposes,) within and for the county and State aforesaid, , aged years, a resident of , in the State of , who, being duly sworn according to law, declares that she is the widow of , deceased, who was a , in the company commanded by Captain , in the regiment of ....: , commanded by , in the war with Great Britain, declared by the United States on the 18th day of June, 1812, {or other war, as the case may be;) that her said husband enlisted {or volunteered or was drafted) at , on or about the day of , A. D , for the term of , and continued in actual service in said war for the term of , and was honorably discharged at , on the day of A.D (o) (a) The notes to the preceding declaration are also applicable to this. In some cases it will, perhaps, be impossible for the widow to state the facts in relation to her hus- band's services with the particularity as to dates, &c., indicated by the above form. In such ease she must set forth the facts with as much accuracy as possible. It will be indispensable for her to state the company and regiment in which he served. If her husband was killed in battle, that fact must be set forth in the declaration. This declaration must be accompanied by satisfactory proof of the marriage, and of the husband's death. If there be a public record of the marriage, a duly certified copy of it should be forwarded, if possible. If there be none but a private or family record, such family record, or a certified copy of the same, should be forwarded, with the affi. davit of some disinterested persons proving the genuineness of the original and the correctness of the copy. If no public or private record of the marriage exist, or can be procured, that fact should be set forth in the declaration ; and in such case, other evidence — such as the testimony of persons who knew the parties in the lifetime of the 230 BOUNTY LANDS. She makes this declaration for the purpose of obtaining the boanty land to which she may be entitled under thrf "act passed September 28, 1850." (^Claimant's signature.) Sworn to and subscribed before me the day and year above written, (Officer's signature.) APPLICATION BY MINOR CHILDREN. If any oflScer or soldier who would have heen entitled to hounty land under this act be dead, leaving no widow who still survives him, but a child or children under the age of majority, at the time of the issuing of the warrant, such minor child or children are entitled to the same quantity of land that the father would have been en- titled to. In such case, the guardian, or next friend of such minor child or children, must make a declaration as nearly corresponding with the foregoing forms as the nature of the case will admit. He must state the time of the father's death, the fact that no widow survives him, and the name or names, and exact age or ages, of his surviving minor child or children. This declaration must be accompanied by satisfactory proof of the father's death, that no widow survives him, and of the ages of the minor children. If there be any family record showing the ages of the children, that or a certified copy of it should be forwarded, with the afiSdavit of some disinterested person, proving the genuineness of the original, and that the copy certified is a true and correct one. husband, and knew them to live together as husband and wife, and to be so reputed — will be admissible. ICr In no case, however, will the mere statement of witnesses that the claimant is the icidote of the deceased, be taken as evidence of the marriage ; but the witnesses must state the facts and circumstances from which they derive their knowledge or opinion that she is the widow of the deceased. A certificate from the clergyman or magistrate who solemnized the marriage is not competent evidence, unless the genuineness of the certificate be proved, and the person who gave it be shown to have been authorized to solemnize marriages. She further states that she was married to the said in , on the day of , A. D , by one , a , and that her name before her said marriage was , ; that her said husband died at , on the day of , A. D , and that she is still his widow, (a) (a) A widow forfeits her title by a subsequent marriage (except those widows whose husbands were killed in battle ;) and in such case it descends to the minor child or children, if any. GENERAL EULES. 231 No. 6. BOUNTY LANDS FOE ALL MILITIA OR VOLUNTEER OFFICERS AND SOLDIERS WHO HAVE BEEN PAID FOR MILITARY SERVICES SINCE THE 18tH JUNE, 1812. An act making land warrants assignable, and for other purposes. Sec. 4. And he it further enacted, That in all cases where the militia or volunteers or State troops of any State or Territory were called into military service, and whose services have been paid by the United States subsequent to the eighteenth of June, eighteen hun- dred and twelve, the officers and soldiers of such militia, volunteers, or troops, shall be entitled to all the benefits of the act entitled "An act granting bounty land to certain officers and soldiers who have been engaged in the military service of the United States," approved September twenty-eighth, eighteen hundred and fifty, and shall receive lands for their services according to the provisions of said act, upon proof of length of service as therein required ; and that the last proviso of the ninth section of the act of eleventh of February, eighteen hundred and forty-seven, be and the same is hereby repealed: Provided, That nothing herein contained shall authorize bounty land to those who have heretofore received or become entitled to the same. [Approved, Marcii 22, 1852.] The benefits of the act of September 28, 1850, were confined to those who had served in the field during some war declared or recog- nised by Congress. This act, it will be perceived, extends to all militia, volunteers, and State troops who, since the declaration of the last war with Great Britain, had been paid by the United States for military services, whether at the seat of hostilities or not, and whether during a time of acknowledged war or not. With this exception, all the remarks relative to the act of 1850 apply to this. The form of declaration is the same with that under the act of 1850, except in the recitation of the act, which of course is named as that of March 22, 1852. GENERAL RULES RELATING TO ALL LAND WARRANTS. A warrant obtained by fraud will always be cancelled by the Department, unless in the hands of an innocent purchaser. In the latter event, the Secretary of the Interior, on the 10th November, 1851, decided that the government was responsible. The fact that a party has fraudulently obtained a land warrant for a particular service, does not preclude the party really entitled. Land warrants, at first expressly made incapable of transfer, were all made assignable by the following act : — 232 BOUNTY LANDS. An act making land warrants assignable, and fi>r other purposes. Be it enacted hy the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That all warrants for military bounty land, which have been or may hereafter be issued under any law of the United States, and all valid locations of the same, which have been or may hereafter be made, are hereby declared to be assignable, by deed or instrument of writing, made and executed after the taking effect of this act according to such form, and pursu- ant to such regulations as may be prescribed by the Commissioner of the General Land Office, so as to vest the assignee with all the rights of the original owners of the warrant or location : Provided, That any person entitled to pre-emption right to any land, shall be entitled to use any such land warrant, in payment of the same, at the rate of $1.25 per acre, for the quantity of land thenein specified : Provided, That the warrants which have been or may hereafter be issued in pursuance of said laws, or of this act, may be located, according to the legal subdivisions of the public lands,^ in one body, upon any lands of the United States, subject to private entry at the time of such location, at the minimum price : Provided further, That when said warrants shall be located on lands which are subject to entry at a greater minimum than $1.25 per acre, the locator of said warrants shall pay to the United States in cash the difference between the value of such warrants at $1.25 per acre, and the tract of land located on. [Approved, March 22, 1853.] PART YII. PAY TABLES, MISCELLANEOUS RULES» &C. ARMY PAY. PAY OF THE ARMY, ACCORDING TO THE PAY TABLE OF 1852. Bank or Grade. Pay per montli. Itlajor general $200 Aid-de-camp, in addition to pay, &c., of lieutenant „ 24 Brigadier general 104 Aid-de-camp to brigadier general, in addition to pay, &c., of lieu- tenant 20 Adjutant general 90 Assistant adjutant general, 'with rank of It. colonel..'. 75 Assistant adjutant general, with rank of major 60 Assistant adjutant general, with rank of captain 50 Quartermaster general 104 Inspector general.\ 90 Assistant quartermaster general... 90 Deputy quartermaster general 75 Quartermaster 60 Assistant quartermaster 60 Paymaster general, $2,500 per ann. Deputy paymaster general 75 Paymaster 60 Commissary general of subsistence 90 Assistant commissary general of subsistence 75 Commissary of subsistence, with rank of major 60 Commissary of subsistence, with rank of captain •••. 50 Assistant commissary of subsist- ance, in addition to pay, &c,, of lieutenant 20 Surgeon general, $2,500 perann. Surgeon of ten years' service in that grade 60 Surgeon, less than ten years' ser- vice 60 Rank or Grade. Pay per month. Assistant surgeon of ten years' ser- vice $ 50 50 33J 60 50 60 50 Assistant surgeon of five years' service Assistant surgeon, less than five years' service Prof, of natural and experimental philosophy 75 Assistant prof, of natural and ex- perimental philosophy 50 Professor of mathematics and com- mander of corps of cadets, each Assistant professor of mathematics Professor of engineering Assistant professor of engineering and instructor of practical engi- neering, each Professor of chemistry, mineralogy, and geology 60 Assistant professor of chemistry, mineralogy, and geology,, and assistant professor of ethics, each 50 Chaplain and professor of ethics... 60 Teacher of French language 50 Teacher of drawing 50 Master of the sword 46; Military storekeeper, clothing de- partment, $1,250 per annum... Storekeeper of ordnance at arsenals of construction, $1,250 per ann. Storekeeper of ordnance, $800 per annum. Chaplain not to exceed 40 Colonel of engineers, topographical engineers, ordnance, dragoons, or mounted riflemen Lt. col. of do. do. do. do. do. Major of do. do. do. do. do. (233> 90 75 60 234 PAT TABLES. Rank or Grade. Faj per month. Captain of engineers, topographical engineers, ordnance, dragoons, or mounted riflemen $ 50 Lt. 1st & 2d do. do. do. do. 33^ Adjutant of dragoons, in addition to pay, &c., of lieutenant 10 Begimental quartermaster of dra- goons, in addition to pay, &c., of lieutenant 10 Serg. maj. of drag, or m't'd riflemen 17 Q'rmaster serg. of drag. do 17 Chief bugler of do. do 17 First sergeant of do. do 16 Sergeant of do. do 13 Corporal of do. do 10 Bugler of do. do 9 Far. & blacksm'h of do. do 11 Private of do. do 8 Master armorer, master carriage maker, master blacksmith, of ordnance 30 Armorer of ordnance 16 Blacksmith of do 16 Carriage maker of do 16 Artificer of do 13 Laborer of do 9 Hpspital stewardj'at a post of more than four companies, pay of ord- nance sergeant 18 Hospital steward, pay of 1st serg't. 16 Matron 6 AKTIILEKT AND INPANTBT. Rank or Grade. Fay per month. Colonel 75 Lieutenant-colonel 60 Major 50 Adjutant, in addition to pay, &c. of lieutenant , 10 Kegimental quartermaster, in addi- tion to pay, &c., of lieutenant ... 10 Captain..... 40 First lieutenant 30 Second lieutenant 25 Cadet 24 Sergeant-major 17 Quartermaster-sergeant ,, 17 Principal musician of infantry 17 First sergeant 16 Ord. serg., in addition to pay, of sergeant 5 Sergeant 12 Corporal 9 Artificer of artillery 11 Musician 8 Private 7 SAPPEBS, MINEKS AND P0NT0N1EE3. Sergeant 30 Corporal 16 Musician , 8 Private, of the 1 St class 13 Private, of the 2d class 9 NAVY PAY, AS IT EXISTED ON THE IST JANUAEY, 1835. Pay per month. $100 75 Rank or Grade. Captains Do. of vessels above 20 and un- 1 der 32 guns. J Masters Commandant 60 Lieutenants Commanding 60 Lieutenants 50 Surgeons — Under 5 years — onshore 50 at sea 60 Over 5 years — onshore 55 at sea 65 Over 10 years — on shore 60 at sea 70 Over 20 years — on shore 70 at sea 80 Surgeons of the Fleet — Under 5 years 60 Over 5 years 65 10 years 70 20 years 80 Assistant Surgeons — Under 5 years — onshore 30 Over 2 years — at sea 35 ...... 5 years — on shore 35 at sea 40 Ten years — on shore 40 Rank or Grade. Pay per month. Assistant surgeons at sea 45 Pursers 40 Chaplains 40 Passed Midshipmen..^ 25 Midshipmen 19 Sailing Masters 40 Boatswains 20 Gunners 20 Carpenters , 20 Sail-makers ; 20 School-masters 25 Captains' Clerks 25 Masters' Mates Boatswains' Mates . Carpenters' Mates Coxswains Quarter-Gunners .,., Master-at-Arms Armorers Stewards Coopers Cooks Seaman Ordinary Seaman ... Landsman 20 9 9 8 Boys 6 to 8 MISCELLANEOUS RULES, ETC. 235 The rate of pension of Engineers, Firemen, &c., is fixed by the act of August 11, 1848. MARINE PAY. Rank or Grade. Pay per month. Colonel-Commandant $ 75 Lieutenant-Colonel At sea or on leave 60 Commanding 60 Majors ^_ At sea or on leave 50 Commanding 50 Staff Captains — Adjutant and inspector 60 Pay and quartermasters, each ... CO Staff Lieutenants — Assistant quartermaster 50 Captains — • At sea or on leave — of 30 years' service 40 At sea or on leave — of 25 years' service 40 At sea or on leave — of 20 years' service 40 On shore duty — of 30 years' ser- vice 40 On shore duty — of 25 years' ser- vice 40 On shore duty — of 20 years' ser- vice 40 Commanding a guard in receiving ship or squadron — of 30 years' service 40 Commanding a guard in receiving ship or squadron — of 25 years' service 40 Commanding a guard in receiving Rank or Grade. Pay per month. ship or squadron — of 20 years' service 40 First Lieutenants — At sea or on leave — of 20 years' service 30 At sea or on leave — of 15 years' service 30 At sea or on leave — of 10 years' service 30 On shore duty — of 20 years' ser- vice 80 On shore duty — of 15 ys. service 30 On shore duty — of 10 ys. service 30 Commanding guard in receiving ship or squadron — of 20 years' service 30 Commanding guard in receiving ship or squadron — of 15 years' service 30 Commanding guard in receiving ship or squadron — of 10 years' service 30 Second Lieutenants — At sea or on leave — of 10 years' service 25 At sea or on leave — of 5 years' service 25 Orderly Sergeant 16 Sergeant 13 Corporal 9 Musician 8 Private 7 APPLICATION WHERE A PENSION CERTIFICATE IS ILLEGALLY WITHHELD. The pensioner must state, in its place in the affidavit here ap- pended, the H mount of pension to which he is now entitled, which, in some cases, varies from that in the original certificate ; and he must sign and make oath to the affidavit. The oath may be administered by any officer properly qualified to take an affidavit. Such officer will state, in the place indicated in his certificate here appended, the evidence of identity of the affiant or pensioner ; whe- ther personal knowledge, or the affidavits of respectable persons — giving their names. 236 PAY TABLES, AFFIDAVIT OF THE PENSIONER. State OP , } CouTtty of , S Be it known, that before me , u. Justice of tiie Peace in and for the county aforesaid, personally appeared , and made oath, in due form of law, that he is the identical named in an original pension certificate now ille- gally withheld by , [Here state the facts respecting the detention of the pension certificate.'] that he is entitled to a pension of dollars per month on account of the wounds and disabilities received, or of services rendered to the United States during the war; that he served in Captain 's company of , in the regiment; that he now resides in , and has resided there for the space of years past;, and that, previous thereto, he resided in [Signed] A B Sworn and subscribed this „ day of , 18... . [^Certificate of the officer who administers the oath.] State of , ) County of , ^ Conformably to the regulations of the War Department of the 27th of October, 1832, I, , a magistrate in the county above named, do hereby certify that I have the most satisfactory evidence, viz.: , [Here state the evidence of identity, ichether personal knowledge, or the affidavit of respectable persons,] that ., who this day appeared before me to take the oath of identity, is the identical pensioner he declares himself to be in the annexed affidavit ; and I am also satisfied that the state- ment made by him in relation to the pension certificate is true. Given under my hand at , the day and year above written. C D J. P. [ Certificate and seal of the Clerk of the Court.] I, , clerk of the court of county, certify that is a magistrate as above, and that the foregoing certificate, purporting to be his, is genuine. In testimony whereof^ I have hereunto affixed my seal of office, and subscribed my name, this day of , in the year [l. s.] C C , Clerk of the Court of county. APPLICATION WHERE A PENSION CERTIFICATE IS LOST. The oath of the pensioner must be taken before a duly qualified magistrate, whose official character and signature must be properly authenticated. The pensioner's oath must be supported by another person as to identity, who must swear that he well knows him to be the same per- son described in the affidavit. The magistrate must certify that the deponent is a person of vera- city. And his official character must be authenticated by the certi- ficate of the proper officer, under his seal of office, setting forth that the officer before whom the affidavit may be made is a justice of the peace, judge, or notary public, (as the case may be.) In every case where the clerk of the court or other certifying officer has no public seal of office, the certificate of a member of Congress, proving the official character and signature of the certifying officer, should be sent with the papers. MISCELLANEOUS RULES, ETC. 237 When^ a person acting as an agent or attorney for a pensioner loses the certificate, the affidavit of that person is also required, whicli must be authenticated as above. No attention will be given to applications from persons who act as agents, unless they are known at the War Department, or are vouched for as respectable persons by some one who is known to the Depart- ment. FORM OF APPLICATION FOR A NEW CERTIFICATE OF PENSION. County if , ss. On this day of , 18..., before me, the subscriber, a Justice of the Peace for the said county of , personally appeared , who, on his oath, declares that he is the same person who formerly belonged to the company commanded by Captain , in the regiment commanded by Colonel I in the service of the United States; that his name was placed on the pension roll of the State of ; that he received a certificate of that fact under the signature and seal of the Secretary of War, which certificate, on or about the day of , 18..., a< »r near he [Signed] A B Sworn and subscribed to before me, the day and year aforesaid. C D , J. P. [Here should be /innexed the testimony of some respectable person to identify tire pen. sionerJ] [Here the magistrate must certify that the deponent is a person of veracity,] [And here the Clerk of Court, Secretary of State, or other officer, must certify, under his seal of office, the official character of him, who administered the oaths,] APPLICATION FOR INCREASE OF AN INVALID PENSION. No application for an increase of an invalid pension will be exa- mined, unless the proof be first presented to the pension agent where the payment is made. He will forward the "surgeons' affidavit," the " pension certificate," &c., to the War Department. [Now to the Department of the Interior.] If the applicant was pensioned on account of a wound received previous to the late war, he should be examined by two surgeons, under a commission issued by a judge of one of the United States courts, in order to obtain an increase of his pension. The magistrate who may administer the oath to the surgeons must certify that they are respectable in their profession, or believes, on the information of others, that they are so. And the official character and signature of the magistrate must be certified by a proper officer under his seal of office. If the claimant be within thirty miles of an army surgeon, he must obtain his testimony. The oath may be made before any officer duly authorized to admi- nister oaths. SURGEONS' AFFIDAVIT FOR AN INCREASE OF INVALID PENSION. It is hereby certified that , formerly a of Captain 's company, in the regiment of ; who it appears by the accompanying , was placed on the pension roll at the rate of dollars per month, on account, as he states, of having received a while in the line of his duty, and in the said service, on or about the „.,,., day of ....,.«... , in the year , at 238 PAY TABLES, a place called , in the State [or Territory] of , ia not only BtiU disabled in consequence of the said injury, but, in my opinion, is entitled to more than he already receives as a pensioner, being disabled to a degree amounting to of 0- total disability E F. , ) gurgems. Sworn to and subscribed before me, C D , J. P. [Here should follow the certificate of the magistrate, thai the surgeons are respectable in their profession.] [And here the Clerk of Court, Secretary of State, or other officer, should certify, under his seal 0/ office, the official character (f the magistrate who administered the oath.] APPLICATION FOR TRANSFER OF PAYMENT OF PENSION. The oath of the applicant must be taken before a duly qualified magistrate, whose official character and signature must be certified by the proper officer, under his seal of office. The county clerk, Secretary of State, or some other officer, will certify under his seal of office, that the officer who administered the oath is a justice of the peace, judge, mayor, alderman, or notary public, (as the case may be,) and that the signature purporting to be his is genuine. The oath must be supported by the testimony of some respectable person, as to the pensioner's identity. He must swear that the per- son who has taken the oath is the person described in the affidavit. The magistrate must certify that the witness is a person of veracity, and the affidavit must also be authenticated in the manner above directed. In every case where the clerk of the court, or other certifying officer, has no public seal of office, the certificate of a member of Congress, proving the official character and signature of the certify- ing officer, should be sent with the papers. FORM OF APPLICATION FOR A TRANSFER OF PENSION. County of , ss. On this day of 18..., before me, the subscriber, n Justice of the Peace for the said county of , personally appeared , who, on his oath, declares that he is the same person who formerly belonged to the company com- manded byCaptain , in the regiment commanded by Colonel , in the service of the United States ; that his name was placed on the pension roll of the State of , from whence he has lately removed; that he now resides in the State [District or Territory] of , where he intends to remain, and wishes his pension to be there payable in future. The following are his reasons for removing from to : [Signed] A B Sworn and subscribed to before me, the day and year aforesaid. C D J. P. [Here should be annexed a certificate, to identify the pensioner, by some respectable person.] [Here the magistrate must certify that the vjitness is a person of veracity,] [And here the Clerk of Court, Secretary of State, or other officer, must certify, under his seal of office, the official character of him who administered the oaths.] A. APPLICATION WHERE THE PENSION IS TO BE DRAWN BY AN ATTORNEY. State or )^ County of , { Be it known, that before me, , a , in and for the county aforesaid, duly authorized by law to administer oaths, personally appeared , MISCELLANEOUS RULES, ETC. 239 and made oath in due form of law, that he is the identical person named in an original certificate in his possession, of which (I certify) the following is a true copy : (a) [Here insert a copy of his certificate oj pension.] that he now resides in , and has resided there for the space of years past; and that previous thereto he resided in ; and that he has not been employed, or paid, in the army, navy, or marine service of the United States from the day of to [Signed] ' A B Sworn and subscribed this day of , 18..., before me. C D J. P. :::. !■ B. State of County of 18.... I, •••••, a magistrate in the county above named, do hereby certify that 1 have the most satisfactory evidence, (6) viz: , that who has this day appeared before me to take the oath of identity, is the identical per son named in the pension certificate, which he has exhibited before me, numbered , and bearing date at the War Office, the day of , 18... ; and signed by , Secretary of War. Given under my hand at , on the day and year above written. C D J. P. State OF , I County of ,5 I, , clerk of the court, of the county and State aforesaid, do hereby certify that is a Justice of the Peace, in and for said county, duly commissioned and qualified ; that his commission was dated on the day of , 18..., and will expire on the day of , 18..., and that his signature above written is genuine. Given under my hand and the seal of said county, this day of , 18... [I..S.] C C ,Chr]c. Know all men by these presents. That I, , of , (c) pensioner of the United States, do hereby constitute and appoint my true and lawful attorney, for me, in my name, to receive from the agent of the United States for paying pensions in , State of , my pension from the day of , 18..., to the day of , 18.... Witness my hand and seal, this day of , 18.... [Signed] A B Sealed and delivered in presence of [L.S.] C D ,J.P. (a) Where the pension has been increased since the certificate has been given, the magistrate will note the fact. In case of a revolutionary pensioner, the part of the above form which requires the pensioner to depose that " he has not been employed, or paid," &c., is not required. The law of April 30, 1844, forbids the payment of an invalid pension to any person while in either of the military services, " unless the disability, for which the pension was granted, be such as to have occasioned his employment in a lower grade." (6) Here state what the evidence is ; whether personal knowledge, or the aflSdavits of respectable persons, giving their names. Where the pensioner is personally known to the agent, and he will certify to his iden- tity, the above form (B) may be dispensed with. (c) In this blank insert the word invalid, or revolutionary, as the case may be. 240 PAY TABLES, ite. State OF , County of Be it known, That on the day of , 18..., before the Bubscriber, a in and for said county, duly authorized by law to administer oaths, person- ally appeared , above named, and acknowledged the foregoing power of attorney to be his act and deed. In testimony whereof I have hereunto set my hand, the day and year last above mentioned. C D J. P. State OF , > County of , \ Be it known, That on the day of , 18..., before me, a. , in and for said county, duly authorized by law to administer oaths, personally appeared , the attorney named in the foregoing power of attorney, and made oath that he had no interest whatever in the money he is authorized to receive, by virtue of the foregoing power of attorney, either by any pledge, mortgage, sale, assignment, or transfer, and that he does not know or believe that the same has been so disposed of to any person whatever. Sworn and subscribed the day and year last above mentioned, before me, C D ,J.P. D. APPLICATION BY THE PENSIONER'S GUARDIAN. State OF , i County of , \ ' Be it known, That before me, , a in and for said county, duly authorized bylaw to administer oaths, personally appeared : , guardian of , and made oath in due form of law that the said is still living, and is the identical person named in the original certificate in his possession, of which (I certify) the following is a true copy : [Here insert a copy of his certificate of pension,] that he now resides in , and has resided there for the space of years past, and that previous thereto he resided in , Guardian. Sworn and subscribed this day of , 18..., before me. C D ,J.P. If the application is made by the pensioner himself, the same form will be observed as in applications by an attorney, omitting form C. and the oath of the attorney. E. APPLICATION BY A WIDOW. State, [or Territory] of , > County (f , ^*''' Be it known, That before me , a , duly authorized bylaw to administ^ oaths, in and for the county aforesaid, personally appeared , and made oath in due form of law, that she is the identical person named in an original certificate in her possession, of which (I certify) the following is a true copy ,• [Here insert a copy of her certificate of pension.] that she has not intermarried, but continues the widow of the abovemetitioncd ; and that she now resides in , and has resided there for the space of years past; and that previous thereto she resided in ; of the truth of which statements I am fully satisfied. [Signed] A B Swornto and subscribed this day of , 18..., before me. C D.'.....,J.P. MISCELLANEOUS RULES, ETC. 241 F. APPLICATION BY THE WIDOW OR CHILD OF A DECEASED PEN- SIONER FOR ARREARS. State OP 1 County of ^««- Be it known, That before me ,a in and for the county atoresaid, duly authorized by law to administer oaths, personally appeared and made oath, m due form of law, that she is the widow (or son, or daughter, as the case may be,) of , the identical person who was a pensioner, and is now dead, and to whom a certificate of pension was issued, which is here- with surrendered. That the deceased pensioner resided in [Signed] A B Sworn to and subscribed this day of , 18..., before me. C D.. '...., J. P. G. POWER OF ATTORNEY FOR THE WIDOW OR CHILD OF A DECEASED PENSIONER. Know all men by these presents. That I, , of , in the county of , State of , widow, (or child, as the case may be,) of , who was a pensioner of the United States, do hereby constitute and appoint my true and lawful attorney, for me, and in my name, to receive from the agent of the United States for paying pensions in , State of , the balance of said pension from the day of , 18..., to the day of , 18..., being the day of his death. Witness my hand and seal this day of , 18... [Signed] A B Sealed and delivered in presence of [l. 8.] C D J. P. H. CERTIFICATE OF THE COURT AS TO THE DEATH OF THE PENSIONER State OF , ( County cf , \ I, , clerk of the court of , holden at in and for , do hereby certify that satisfactory evidence has been exhibited to said court that was a pensioner of the United Stales at the rate of dollars per ; was resident of the county of , in the State of , and died in the , in the State of , in the year , on the day of ; that he left a widow [or no widow] (or children, as the case may be) whose name is (or are, as the case may be.) In testimony whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my seal of office at .this day of , in the year of our Lord 18... . ' ■ [l. s.] C C , Clerk of the If the application be by an executor or administrator, insert their description where "widow" or "child" occurs. The above are for the payment of money on pension certificates, and are to be presented to the pension agent at the agency where the certificate is payable. 16 242 PAT TABLES, APPLICATION FOR RENEWAL OF A LOST LAND WARRANT. The following instructions apply as well to Land Warrants under any other act, which the claimant has lost, as to those under 1850 : In all applications for the reissue of land bounty warrants granted under the act of September 28th, 1850, in lieu of the originals which may have been lost or destroyed, the following regulations, approved by the Department of the Interior, will be observed : When a warrant has failed to reach the- hands of the party entitled to receive it, and to whom it was sent, or has been lost after being received, the party should at once enter a caveat in the General Land Office, to prevent the issuing of a patent to a fraudulent claimant, and should give public notice of the facts in the case at least once a week for six successive weeks in some newspaper of general circula- tion at or nearest the place to which the warrant was directed, or where the loss occurred. In such publication the intention shall also be expressed to apply to the Commissioner of Pensions for a duplicate of such warrant, wluch, of course, should be minutely described, in order to guard against the improper use of the one first issued. The identity of the applicant must be satisfactorily established, and the facts upon which the application for the reissue is based must be fully and clearly set forth under oath, the warrantee stfeiting in his affidavit (if such be the fact) that he has never himself located, nor empowered any person to locate for him, the warrant in question. In cases where the claim for a duplicate is founded upon the non- reception of the original, the agent, if there be one, is required to unite with the warrantee in the application for renewal. It is requisite that the credibility of each and every affiant be duly certified by the magistrate administering the oath, and that his official character and signature be verified by the proper officer under. his seal of office. FORM OF ASSIGNMENT OF LAND WARRANTS. General Land Office, March 23, 1852. By the first section of the act of Congress, entitled "An act making land warrants assignable, and for other purposes," approved March 22, 1852, it is provided : " That all warrants for military bounty land which have been, or may hereafter be issued, under any law of the United States, and all valid locations of the same, which have been, or may hereafter be made, are hereby declared to be assignable, by deed or instrument of writing, made and executed after the taking efiiect of this act, according to such form, and pur- suant to such regulations as may be prescribed by the Commissioner of the General Land Office, so as to vest the assignee with all the rights of the original owners of the warrant or location." In accordance with the provisions of this Section, the following forms are prescribed for the assignment of the warrants and locations referred to, to wit : MISCELLAJ^EOTTS RULES, ETC. 24S 1. FORM FOR THE ASSIGNMENT OF THE WARRANT. For value received I, A. B., to whom the within warrant No was i«M6d, !,„ I T*^ *'''^° ™'° ^- °-' <><■ .^"d to his heirs and a«ign^ therefor """''•''nt, and authorize him to locate the same, and receive a patent Witness my hand and seal, this dav of IR Attest: E. P. ■' , lo... . ^ w A. B. [SBAL.J FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT WHERE THE VENDER IS KNOWN TO THE OFFICER TAKING THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT. State OP '., ; County cf , ^ **■ On (.his day of , in the year , personaliy appeared [Here insert the name of the warrantee] to me well known, and acknowledged the forego, ing assignment to be his act and deed 5 and I certify that the said [Here insert the name of the warrantee] is the identical person to whom the within warrant issued, and who executed the foregoiifg assignment thereof (Officer's signature.) FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT WHERE THE VENDER IS NOT KNOWN TO THE OFFICER, AND HIS IDENTITY HAS TO BE PROVED. State OF i County of 5'** On this day of , in the year , personally came before me [Here insert the name of the warrantee] and [Here insert the name and residence of a wit- ness,] and the said [Here insert the name of the witness] being well known to me as a credible and disinterested person, was duly sworn by me, and on his oath declared and said, that he well knows the said [Here insert the name of the warrantee,] and that he is the same person to whom the within warrant issued, and who executed the foregoing assignment, and his testimony being satisfactory evidence to me of that fact, the said [Here insert the name of the warrantee] thereupon acknowledged the said assignment to be his act and deed. [Officer's signature.) 2. FORM FOR THE ASSIGNMENT OF THE LOCATION. For value received, I, A. B., to whom the within certificate of location was issued, do hereby sell and assign unto C. D., and to his heirs and assigns forever, the said certifi- cate of location, and the warrant and land therein described, and authorize him to re. ceive the patent therefor. Witness my hand and seal, this day of ,18.... Attest: E. F. A. B. Tseai.] G. H. FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT WHERE THE VENDER IS PERSONALLY KNOWN TO THE OFFICER TAKING THE SAME. ■State OF ^^ County of On this day of , in the year personally appeared [Here insert the name cf the person to wham the certijicate of location issued] to me well known, and acknowledged the foregoing assignment to be his act and deed j and I certify, that the said [Here insert the name of the person to whom the certificate of location issued] is the identical person to whom the within certificate of location issued, and who executed the foregoing assignment thereof (Officer's signature.) 244 PAY TABLES, ETC. FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT WHERE THE VENDER IS NOT PERSON- ALLY KNOWN TO THE OFFICER, AND WHERE HIS IDENTITY HAS TO BE PROVED. .State OF ) County of ("• On this day of , in the year , personally came before me [Here insert the name of the person to whom the certificate of location issued,] and [Here insert the name and residence rf a untness,] and the said [Here insert the name of the wit- ness] being well known to me as a credible and disinterested person, was duly sworn by me, and on his oath declared and said that he well knows the said [Here insert the name of the person to whom the certificate of location issued,] and that he is the same per- son to whom the within certificate of location issued, and who executed the foregoing assignment; and his testimony being satisfactory evidence to me of that fact, the said [Here insert the name tf the person to whom the certificate of location issued,] thereupon acknowledged the said assignment to be his act and deed. (^Officer's signature.) APPENDIX. Since this work went to press, Congress has passed the following acts, enlarging and amending the acts therein described. An act to repeal the first proviso of the fourth section of the act entitled " An act grant- ing- bounty land to certain officers and soldiers who have been engaged in the mili- tary service of the United States," approved September twenty-eighth, one thousand eight hundred and fifty. Be it enacted ly the Senate and Souse of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the first pro- viso of the fourth section of the act entitled. " An act granting bounty land to certain officers and soldiers who have been engaged in the military service of the United States," approved September 28th, 1850, be and the same is hereby repealed. [Approved, August 4, 1854.J The effect of this act is simply to admit members of the Congress of 1850 to the benefit of the bounty land act referred to. An act making appropriations for the support of the army, for the year ending the thir- { tieth of June, one thousand eight hundred and fifty-five. Sec. 3. And he it further enacted. That the act approved Septem- ber twenty-eight, one thousand eight hundred and fifty, entitled "An act granting bounty land to certain officers and soldiers who have been engaged in the military service of the United States," the act approved March twenty-second, one thousand eight hundred and fifty- two, entitled " An act to make bounty land warrants assignable, and for other purposes," and the act approved February third, one thou- sand eight hundred and fifty-three, entitled " An act to continue half- pay to certain widows and orphans," shall not be so construed as to deprive any widow from the benefits therein granted for the services of her husband, though she may have married again ; Provided, however, that the applicant is a widow at the time of making the claim : Pro- vided, such party shall not receive pension during coverture. [This section removes the disability which, it will be found under the appropriate heads, heretofore attached to widows who have re- married after the death of the husbands for whose services they claim.] Sec. 4. And he it further enacted. That the Secretary of War be and he is hereby authorized and directed to receive, and cause to be placed on the files of his department, such additional muster-rolls of the battalion of volunteers commanded by Lieut. Col. J. C. Fremont, 245 246 APPENDIX. in California, duly authenticated by the proper officers, aa have not heretofore been received and filed, and to cause such corrections of the muster-rolls to be made in regard to the periods of enlistment and terms of service, and the omission of names of members of said battalion, as upon satisfactory proof he may deem right and proper, and as far as possible to correspond with the pay-rolls of Major P. B. Reading, paymaster of said battalion, irith respect to the period of service ; so that all who served in the military service of the United States in California during the late war with Mexico, whether under the command of naval or military officers, may be entitled to all the benefits of the acts of Congress providing for the enrolment of volun- teers in the Mexican war : Provided, that no payment shall be made in consequence of this section beyoijd the sum heretofore appropriated. [AppfOT^d, August 5, 1854.) [The object of this section appears to be merely to jgrjant pensions and bpnnty lan<^ to J'r^paont's meii under t^ same cpnditions under which they have heretofore been grafted to volunteers in the Mexican war.] An act fgr the relief of the United States troops who werp si^exer^ by the r^c^nt ^laSkOr ter to the steamship San fVaneisoo. Sbo. 2. And he it further enacted, * * * That the widows and minor children of those officers, non-commissioned officers, and pri- vates, who perished by this disaster, or who died from disease in cpii^ sequence thereof, shall bp allowed pensions in the same manner in all respects as if the said officers, non-commissioned officers and privates had been killed in battle. [Ajjp»o?gd. March 2?, J8S4,] INDEX. Relating to Revolutionary Pensions. ACTS. Mareh 2, 1829 page 5 June 19, 1840 5 May 20, 1836 8 March 18, 1818 13 May 1, 1820 14 March 1, 1823 15 May 15, 1828 16 May 31, 1830 18 July 14, 1832 18 June 7, 1832 19 Februaryl9, 1833 20 March 2, 1833 22 July 14, 1832 22 May T, 1846 30 July 4, 1836 32 March 3, 1837 33 July 7, 1838 37 August 16, 1842 ; 38 August 23, 1842 38 April 30, 1844 38 January 23, 1845 38 March 3, 1843 40 June 17, 1844 40 February 2, 1848 42 July 29, 1848 43 February 3, 1853 44 July 5, 1832 47 Relating to Army and Militia Invalids. April 10, 1806 77 April 30, 1790 81 MarchS, 1792 81 March 3, 1795 81 March 23, 1796 82 247 248 INDEX. Eblating to Army and Militia Invalids. ACTS. May 30, 1796 page 82 May 28, 1798 83 « March 2, 1799 83 " March 16, 1802 83 April 12, 1808 84 April 25, 1808 84 " January 2, 1812... 84 " January 11, 1812 85 " February 6, 1812 85 April 8, 1812 86 " April 10, 1812 86 " January 29, 1813 87 " July 5, 1818 87 " August 2, 1813 88 " February 24, 1813 89 " January 28, 1814 89 " March 3, 1815 89 « April 16, 1816 90 " June 15, 1832 90 March 2, 1833 91 " March 19, 1836 91 " May 23, 1836 92 « May 13, 1846 92 " July 10, 1848 ; 93 " April 14, 1842 93 July 26, 1813 93 (( Eelating to Army and Militia Widows and Orphans. « June 7,1794 107 March 14, 1798 108 » March 16, 1802 108 '' April 12, 1808 108 » January 2, 1812 i 108 " January 11, 1812 109 " April 10, 1812 109 " January 29, 1813 110 " August 2, 1813 110 " March 3, 1815 110 ' April 16, 1816 Ill " March 3, 1817 Ill " April 20, 1818 112 " March 2, 1833 112 " March 19, 1836 112 " July 4, 1836 114 " July 21,. 1848 114 " February 22,1849 115 " February 3, 1853 -. 116 (( « INDEX. 249 Relating to Commutation op Land for Pension. ACTS. April 16, 1816 page 122 Relating to Navy and Marine Invalids. " July 1, 1791 123 " March 2, 1799 124 " April 23, 1800 124 " March 26, 1804 125 " August 11, 1848. '.v..'.'.'.'."."! 125 " July 11, 1798 ;■.;;;; 126 " June 26, 1812 126 February 13, 1813 127 August 2, 1813 127 Relating to Navy and Marine Widows and Orphans. January 20, 1813 141 " March 4, 1814 145 March 3, 1817 147 " January 22, 1824 •. 147 " March 3, 1837 148 " August 11, 1848 149 " June 28, 1832 150 « June 30, 1834 151 " April 2, 1816 152 " June 15, 1844 152 Relating to Bounty Lands. " December 24, 1811 199 " January 10, 1812 199 " February 6, 1812 199 " January 29, 1813 199 " January 11, 1812 200 " January 20, 1813 201 " July 5, 1813 201 " February 24, 1814 202 " December 10, 1814 202 " April 16, 1816 203 « April 27, 1816 207 " February 11, 1847 209 " March 22, 1852 210 « May 27, 1848 211 " August 10, 1848 211 « September 28, 1850 223 " March 22, 1852 225 Act, Special, Construction of 9, 159 " Pension, to whom it applies 12 Administration, On a pensioner's estate, where to be had 12 250 INDEX. Adjutant-General. See Pay Table. Aid. See Pay Table. Apothecary. See Pay Table. Armorer. See Pay Table. Artificer. See Pay Table. Abmt, (Revolutionary,) Organization of .....page 55 " Disbandment 68 " Pay of. See Pay Table. " Pension of. See Regulars, MUitia, Volunteers, Rangers, Ordnance. Arrears, Of Revolutionary pension, to whom payable.. 5 " Under Act of June 7th, 1832, to whom payable 21 " Of Half-pay, to whom payable 52 " Of army invalid pension , 102 " Of navy " 135 " Of navy and marine widows' pension ,.., . .154-158 Barrack Master. See Pay Table. Baker. See Pay Table. Boatswain. See Pay Table. Bombardier. See Pay Table. Bounty Land. See 'Regulars, Volunteers, Militia, Marines. " Who entitled to, under Acts of December 24, 1811, to December 10, 1814 203 " Descends, and is devisable under these acts... 205 " Who entitled to under Act of 1847 212 " What bars under that act 212 " Not devisable under it 219 " How many warrants the same person may receive 220 " How many warrants the same person may re- ceive under Acts of 1850 and 1852.......... 225 Bounty Land Warrant. See Warrant. Brigade Major. See Pay Table. Brigadier General. See Pay Table. Captivity, Time spent in, counted as service under Act of 1832 82 " Same rule under Act of 1850 226 Captain. See Pay Table. Carpenter. See Pay Table. Cadets, Entitled to pension , 96 Certificate. See Pension Certificate. Chaplain. See Pay Table. Cherokees, Invalid pensions to , 98 Clerk. See Pay Table. Clothier. See Pay Table. Continentals. See Regulars. Commutation (Continental) 45 (Virginia) 58 Bears half-pay 51 U. S. does not now pay 54 Connecticut, Her quotas of troops in the Revolutionary War.. 59 ii li INDEX. 251 Corporal. See Pay Table. Cornet. See Pay Table, Coxswain, See Pay Table. Colonel. See Pay Table. Cooper. See Pay Table. Cook, See Pay Table. Conductor. See Pay Table. Commissary. See Pay Table. Construction, Of Navy and Marine Widows' and Orphans' Pension Acts page Wl Declaration, For pension, not good if made before a justice of the peace 11 " For revolutionary pension under Act of 1828... 19 " " " " 1832... 23 " " " " 1836... 84 " " " " 1838... 41 " " " February 2, 1848... 42 " " " July 29, 1848... 44 " . " " February 3, 1853... 44 " For invalid army pension 102 " By army widow or orphan 119 " For invalid navy pension 139 " For increase of navy pension 139 " By navy widow or orphan....,., 192 " By same for renewal 193 " For bounty land for revolutionary services 197 " For same by heirs 198 " " war of 1812 208 " When discharge is lost 208 " Under Act of 1847 220 " " 1850 229 " By minor under same , 230 " Under Act of 1852 232 " Where pension certificate is illegally withheld, . . . 235 " Where it is lost 236 " For increase of army invalid pension 237 " For transfer of payment 238 " For payment to an attorney 238 " " to a guardian 240 " " to the pensioner 240 " " to a widow 240 " For arrears due a widow or child 240 Delaware, Her quotas of troops in the Revolutionary War.... 60 Desertion, Forfeits all right to a pension 11 " What amounts to , 11 Director, To General Hospital. See Pay Table. Discharge, Lost or omitted, how supplied 207 Divorce, Binds the party applying for it 32 Drummer. See Pay Table. Election, Between land and scrip, final 212 Engineer. See Pay Table. 252 INDEX. Ensign. See Pay Table. Evidence, In application by revolutionary widows page 30 " " " army widows, &c 118 " " " navy widows, &c 130 " " " for bounty land under Act of 1847.. 219 " " " " « " 1850.. 226 Executioner. See Pay Table. Express Rider. See Pay Table. Farrier. See Pay Table. FiFER. See Pay Table. Forage Master. See Pay Table. Foreign Officers, Whether entitled under Act of 1832 21 Fraud, Vitiates a warrant obtained by it 203 " Does not deprive the party entitled 219 General. See Pay Table. Georgia, Her quotas of troops in the Revolution 60 Gunner. See Pay Table. Half-Pat (Continental) 45 " (Virginia) : 47 " When the latter commences to a paroled officer 50 " Barred by acceptance of commutation 51 " (Virginia,) When citizenship of Virginia is requisite to entitle to 51 " Dependent on actual rank 52 " Not barred by pension due for both line and staff service 53 Half-Blood, Shares pension with the whole blood 156 Hospital. See Pay Table. Insanity, Proceedings where the claimant labors under 11 Invalid Pension, Does not bar from Act of 1828 18 " Nor from Act of 1832 20 " (Army) What injury entitles to 94 " Rate of. 95 *' In militia cases 96 " Governed by rank in the line 97 " When it commences 97 " What bars it 98 " (Navy) What injury entitles to 130 " When it commences 130 " What bars it 132 Identity, Proof of by applicant for invalid pension 103 Interest, Not allowed on half-pay 50 Inspector. See Pay Table. Judge Advocate. See Pay Table. Land. See Bounty Land. Land Warrant. See Warrant. Law, Not repealed by implication, unless the latter law is in- consistent 100 " Repeal of one under which a pensioner was dropped, does not restore him 101 INDEX. 253 Limitation, None to pension claim: page 10 " Nor to half-pay 50 Lieutenant-Colonel. See Pay TaUe. Lieutenant. See Pay Table. Location, Assignment of 243 Major. See Pay Table. Maryland, Her quotas of troops during the Revolutionary "War 61 Marines, All who served six months in the Revolution entitled to pension 20 " Invalid pensions to 123-126 " Of the Mexican war, rate of pension to 138 " Of the Mexican war, entitled to bounty land 211 " Entitled under Act of 1850 225 Massachusetts, Her quota of troops during the Revolutionary War 61 Master-at-Arms. See Pay Table Master. See Pay Table. Mate. See Pay Table. Matross. See Pay Table. Mexican War, Commencement of 220 Militia, Who served six months in the Revolution, entitled to pension 19 " Continental, called out by Congress 59 " Invalid pensions to, for services from 1790 to June 18, 1812 .' 82-84, 86 " From 1812 to Mexican War 88-90, 91 " Officers and soldiers of the, entitled to bounty land,. 223— 231 Minor, Entitled to invalid pension, though discharged for mi- nority 102 " When entitled under Act of 1850 22T " Declaration by, under that act 230 Navy, All who served six months in, during the Revolution, entitled to pension 20 " Invalid pensions 123 " Rate of pension to navy widows, &c 156 Negroes, Free, entitled to bounty land... ._ 207 New York, Her quotas of troops during the Revolution 62 New Jersey, Her quotas of troops during the Revolution 63 New Hampshire, Her quotas of troops during the Revolution. 63 North Carolina, Her quotas of troops during the Revolution. 64 Offices, Inconsistent, not to be united in granting pensions.... 10 Officer, Entitled though never commissioned 11 Organization, Of the Revolutionary Army 55 Ordnance, Invalid pension to 93 " Of the Mexican war, bounty land 211 Orphans, (Army) Pensions to • 107 " Entitled if widow re-marries before the passage of the act under which the claim is made 117 " (Navy) pensions to 141 " How long entitled 155 254 INDEX. OrpAans, Suicide of thefather.. Mge l6l Over-Payment, Not to be retained in Rerolutionary pensions.. 8 " When to be retained from navy widows 153 Pat Table, (Revolutionary) 69 " (Post Revolutionary) Army 233 " Navy 234 " Marines - 285 Pat MaStEb. See Pay Table. " His widow and orphans entitled to pension 117 PiROtB, Time spent on, counted as service under Act of 1832. 22 " Not under Act of 1850 , 226 " Naval ofiBcer on, entitled to half-pay 50 Paupers-. See Regularsi Pension Certificate. See Declaration. " Process when illegally withheld 10, 235 Pension. See Regulars, Volunteers, Militia, Rangers, Ma- rines, Navy, Widows, Orphans, Invalid Pension. Of a defaulter, not to be withheld 8 Governed by- legal pay 11 A vested right under 1828 l8 Governed by length of service in different grades. ... 21 Whether a vested right under 1882 34 To army widowj &c., when it commences 117 Barred if husband's death caused by intemperance... 118 Pensioner, Under 1818 cannot claim under 1832 and 1833.... 22 Peace, After the Revolution ; when signed 58 " When ratified 59 Pennsylvania, Her quotas of troops during the Revolution 65 Pilot. See Pay Tahle. Pbivatbbrs, Not embraced by Act of 1832 21 " Invalid pensions to 121 Private. See Pay Table. Purser. See Pay Table. Quarter Master. See Pay Table. Quarter Master Sbr«eant. See Pay Table. Quarter Master of Marines, His rate of pension 1-36 Rang-ers, Invalid pensions to in 1812 ....84-90 " " " 1832 91 " Serving since 1790, entitled to bounty land 223 Review, Of a secretary's decision, within What time to be had. 10 " Of erroneous allowance cannot be made by another secretary.. 100 Revolutionary War, End of 12, 58, 59 Resolution, Relating to Revolutionary pensions 33 " 39 " " 43 Relating to bounty lands 195 196 210 INDEX. 255 Regulars, "Who served in the Continental army nine months^ if paupers, entitled to a pension page 13 Who served to the end of the war of the Revolution, to a pension 16 Who served six months during the Revolution, enti- tled to a pension 19 " Invalid pension to, from 1794 to 1812 81 Serving through the Revolution on Continental es- blishment, entitled to bounty land 195 " Enlisted for five years or the war, during the war of 1812, entitled to bounty land 198 " Of the Mexican war, entitled to bounty land 209 " Serving since 1790, entitled 223 " Since 1812 231 Resignation, Of an officer must be proved by the government. 51 Rhode Island, Her quotas of troops during the Revolution.... 66 Riding-Mastee. See Pay Table. Sail-Maker. See Pay Table. Saddler. See Pay Table. Sapper and Miner. See Pay Table. Secretary. See Pay Table. Sergeant. See Pay Table. Steward. See Pay Table. Seaman. See Pay Table. Service, (Revolutionary,) When to be counted to the treaty of peace 22 " Must be actual to entitle the widow 81 " Twenty years', in the navy, how computed 160 Sea Fencibles, Invalid pensions to, in the war of 1812 90-93 Store-Keeper. See Pay Table. South Carolina, Her quotas of troops in the Revolution 67 Substitute, Not entitled to bounty land under Acts 1811, &c.. 204 Entitled under September 28, 1850 227 Surgeon, Highest rate of pension under Act of 1828 28 Pay. See Pay Table. Superintendent. See Pay Table. Suicide, When it does not bar pension to widow or orphan 161 Trumpeter. See Pay Table. Virginia. See Half-pay, OommutaHon. " Is responsible for half-pay, notwithstanding the Act of July 5, 1832 51 " Where citizenship of is requisite to entitle to half- pay • 51 " Decision of her courts binding in half-pay cases.... 52 " Her quotas of troops during the Revolution 67 Volunteers, Who served six months during the Revolution, entitled to pension 19 Invalid pensions to 82, 84, 85, 86, 88, 90, 91, 92 " In war of 1812, entitled to bounty land 199 « In Mexican war, " " " 209 256 INDEX. PAGE "Volunteers, For service since 1790, entitled to bounty land... 223 War's Men, (Revolutionary,) Entitled to pension 16 " " " Bounty land 195 " (War of 1812) " " 198 Wagon-Master. See Pay Table. Wagon Conductor. See Fay Table. Warrant, Re-issue of assigned 220 " Issued after soldier's death under 1850, to be can- celled 226 " General rules relating to 227 " Application, when lost 241 " Assignment of 243 " See Fraud. Widow, Commencement of pension to in special case 31 " (Revolutionary) Married before her husband's last ser- vice, entitled to a pension '. 32 May claim, though married a second time 33 May claim, though not a widow on July 4, 1836 33 Married before January 1, 1794, entitled to a pension. 37 May claim, though her husband lived after June 7, 1832 38 May claim, though re-married 38 May claim, though not a widow July 7, 1838 39 Pension under July 4, 1836, not entitled under July 7, 1838 41 Married before January 2, 1800, entitled to a pension. 43 Married since January, 1800, " " " 44 Half-pay to 47 (Army) Pension to 107 (Navy) " 141 Rate of pension 156 When entitled by suicide of her husband 161 When entitled to bounty land under Act of 1850....... 226 Yeoman. See Pay Table. THE END.