♦ BOUGHT WITH THE INCOME PROM THE _SAGE ENDOWMENT FUND THE GIFT OF Henrg M. Sage 1891 A^^i'rnif sktiiz 97»4 Cornell University Library UB430 .F94 The history and leaal effect ()t brevets olln 3 1924 030 743 110 Cornell University Library The original of tliis book is in tine Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31 9240307431 1 THE HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECT BREVETS ARMIHS OF GREAT BRITAIN AND THE UNITED STATES FROM THEIR ORIGIN IN 1692 TO THE PRESENT TIME. JAMES B. FRY, COLONEL AND ASSISTANT ADJUTANT-GENERAL, BREVET MAJOR-GENERAL U. S. ARMY. 1 < < ~ ro ■ t'.* . <'." % -^ Kl^ Brevets are the cheap and peculiar reward of military prowess or genius.- Brevet Lieut.- General Winfield Scott. NEW YORK: D. VAN NOSTRAND, PUBLISHER, 23 Murray and 27 Warren Streets. '1877- Copyright : 1877. By D. van NOSTRAND. PREFACE. Commissions by brevet have lost much of -their value in this country ; indeed, it is now only in the case of an assignment to duty by the President according to " brevet rank," that the brevet takes practical effect. This has been the result of legislation, which has deprived this kind of military appointment of the powers and privileges which, by the common law military, at- tached to it. It has also, as a consequence of its indiscriminate bestowal, ceased to be a distinguishing mark of honor ; neverthe- less, the subject is not without its interest, even to us. It is, of course, possible that the brevet may hereafter be re-vitalized, but, independently of this consideration, it has become a subject of historical interest. In England, the brevet has been known since the days of William the Third, and has formed so important an ingredient in the military orgaiTization, that it is impossible to arrive at a correct understanding of the military institutions of that country, unless familiar with its precise position and effect. It has there largely affected the whole system of promotion, and has been made the subject of several parliamentary inquiries. With us, it was resorted to in the early days of the Revolution, and from that time to this, has had a place in our history ; it is, therefore, as a matter of historical interest that the subject seems to claim attention. Regarding it in this light, I have embodied in these pages, and arranged chronologically, all the matter which iv PREFACE. I have collected. I have aimed at establishing no particular theory, but have simply given the facts and authorities as I have found them. As some of these have not heretofore been published, and as many have been gathered from sources not easily attainable, I am led to hope that the labor of those inter- ested in the study of English and American military institutions will be facilitated by this historical presentation of the subject of brevets. Promotion by brevet has very recently been considered by a commission of the British Government. Since this work went to press, a London publication — " The Wellington" — in an article upon the general labors of this commission, remarks as follows : " One o£ the questions, and by no means the least important, submitted for the consideration of the late commission, was that of brevet promotion, upon which subject many officers gave much interesting advice. In no other European army is there anything resembling this system of reward ; and there are many experienced ofScers in our army who would entirely abolish the practice. Thus, Lieutenant-General S. J. Hodgson, in his evidence, described the brevet system as ' one of the most fatal systems that our army has almost ever seen,' and declared his opinion that everything done by it in the way of pushing forward deserving officers, might be better done through the system of unattached promotion, or through the system of direct promotion to a vacancy in another regiment. Many experienced officers would have substituted for brevet promotion a decoration with a pecuniary reward for distinguished service. On the other hand there are many officers who consider that the advantages of the system outweigh its dis- advantages and anomalies. H. R. H. the Duke of Cambridge, while wishing he could say that the system of brevet is not essential to the service, does not see how it is to be got rid of. Pressed upon the point, the Duke expressed himself as follows : ' Some have thought, and I think myself, that in many cases if you had a larger power of giving good service rewards, no doubt that would take the place of brevet in some respects. Say £,\Qia j year additional pay, or £^o additional pay to a captain, and so on. That would to a certain extent take the place of brevet, but that would not give the man the pull that he has in army rank, because of course the advantage in army rank is very great. Take the case of an officer who has recently distinguished himself very much. He had very good luck, and he knew how to avail himself of it, but he was only a substantive major when he was promoted to general officer,. PREFACE. V and if he had not had the army rank that he had by brevet he never would have been where he is at this moment. Therefore, if you do away with brevet, I do not think that a good many m;n could ever come to the front at all.' Asked again as to whether his opinion is that brevet is a measure of get- ting deserving officers forward into a position in the army which enables the state to supply them in high commands, the Duke of Cambridge replie d : ' That is exactly what I mean, and I think it much less objectionable than the selection of men for a higher substantive rank, which I think would be very hurtful to miny officers, whereas, this system does not injure the officers at all, and yet puts such a man forward. I do not think that giving a good service pension, which has been suggested, could in any way affect the advantage which a man gains by brevet in the mode which I have described.' After duly considering the evidence laid before them, the commissioners came to the conclusion which must, on reflection, be considered a sound one, and which it is as well to give in thsir own words, as follows : — ' With regard to the' sub- ject of pronjtioi by b-evet,' they say, 'it has been stated to us as nearly the universal opinion of thoia whoie evidence W2 have taken, that of late years promotion by brevet for distinguished service has been much too lavishly bestowed ; at the same tima, it is, at present, almost the only way of reward- ing zeal and efficiency on active service, with the exception of unattached promotion, the objections to which last are, that it encuml)ers the half-pay list, and often removes the deserving officer from active service and his reg- iment at the very moment when he is distinguishing himself in it. We are not prepared, therefore, to recommend that the practice of brevet promotion for dis- tinguished service should be discontinued, but rather that it should be much more sparingly applied, and under som; well defined rules and conditions, which should be uniformly adhered to, and should practically restrict the num- ber so promoted. By way of supplement to it, we think the grant of some decoration, accompanied by a small pension in the nature of brevet pay, would probably be acceptable to the army, and serve to mark your Majesty's approbation." It will be observed that this article says " in no other European army is there anything resembling this system of rewards." Chapter 2 (pages 47 to 50) of this work gives the practice in this regard of the principal armies of Europe, and it will be seen from that chapter, that in several of them there are promotions in the nature of brevets, and that the brevet system of Sweden is quite similar to that practised in the British army and in our own. J. B. F. New York, February ist, 1877. CONTENTS. CHAPTER I. Definition of Brevets, with general remarks on their history in the Army of the United States; purposes for which they were called into operation, &c., 9 to 13. CHAPTER II. Derivation of the terra Brevet, 14 ; Early history of Brevets in the armies of Europe, particularly those of Great Britain and France, 14; Brevet ap- pointments in the French Consular service, 1 5 ; Forms of commissions and. of brevet commissions in the British Army, and inthe Army of the United States, 15 to 19; Difference between corps commissions and brevet com- missions considered, 19; General Scott's comments upon system of brevets in the British Army, 20 to 24; System of promotion and retirement, with schedule of pay in the British Army, 25 to 29; British regulations of the present day in regard to brevets, 29; Lieutenant General Fitzroy Somer- set's testimony on the subject of brevet ranl<, 29 to 46 ; Present system of brevet rank in the armies of Germany, Austria, Hungary, France, Russia, Italy, Belgium, Sweden and Spain, 46 to 49. CHAPTER III. Brevets introduced into the Continental Army in 1776, 50; Resolutions of the Continental Congress conferring brevet commissions, 50 to 55 ; First brevet conferred, November 19th, 1777 : rapid bestowal of them thereafter, 55 to 60 ; General brevet conferred by Resolution of September 30, 1783, 60-61 ; Difficulty of providing for the many gentlemen from France desirous of entering the American Armv, and General Washington's letters to Con- gress in relation thereto, 61 ; General Wilkinson's brevet ; his resignation of it, 61 ; McPherson's brevet, and the dissatisfaction it occasioned ; General Washington's letter to Generals Wayne and Irvine on the sub- ject, 62 to 66; Proclamation of October 18, 1783, disbanding the Conti- nental Army, 66 to 67 ; Peace establishment fixed by Resolutions of June, 1784, and April, 1785. 67 ; Harmar brevetted Brigadier General and placed on duty as General-in-Chief; Harmar's the only brevet conferred between 1783 and adoption of Constitution in 1789, 67. CHAPTER IV. Brevets, from adoption of the Constitution in 1789, until the war of 1812, 67; Washington's nominations of officers on the peace establishment, 68 ; Har- 4 CONTENTS. mar the only ofiScer holding a brevet until 1790, 68 ; Washington's message of May 31st, 1790, recommending Mr. de Poiery, late Secretary to the Marquis de Lafayette, for a brevet Captaincy, 63 ; Mr. Poiery's nomina- tion confirmed by the Senate, being the first under the Constitution, 69 ; The question of Generals Butler and Harrison's brevets, 70 to 71 j Powers of the 24th Article of War during the revolutionary struggle, 72 ; Code of 1806, and change of 24th Article of War of 1776 into 6ist article of 1806, 72-73 ; 62d Article of War, resume of the results which sprang from it, 73 ; Staff and line rank considered, 74. CHAPTER V. Act of July 6, 1812, authorizing the bestowal of brevets, and the powers of the President under it, 75 to 76; Macomb's pamphlet of 1825-6, on the sub- ject, 76 to 77. ; Scott's views as to brevet and other commissions, 77 ; Force of brevets when conferred bv President alone, and when confirmed by Senate, 77; Secretary of War Porter's opinion, 77 ; War of 1812,78; Cases of Generals Swartwout and Burbeck, Brigadiers by brevet, 78-80 ; Regulations of 1814 and 1816 in regard to rank and, command, 80 to 82 ; General Order of March 6, 1816, explaining the meaning of the term " de- tachment " as used in the 6ist Article of War, 82; The words "regi- ments " and " corps " as used in 6ist article held to be synonymous terms, 83 ; Action of Congress in regard to pay and emolume.its of officers holding brevet commissions, 83 to 87 ; Act of April 16, 1818, regulating pay and emoluments of brevet officers, 88 ; Regulations of 1821 and 1825, 89-go. CHAPTER VI. Army reduction of 1821,91 ; Case.s of Macomb, Towson, Bernard; Jones, D. S. Townsend and other.s, under the operations of the reduction, gi to 95; Controversy between Scott and Gaines, 96; The struggle for prece- dence in rank, 97 ; Arguments adduced in support of the rival claims, 98 ; Proceedings of a board of officers convened to decide claims of Scott and Gaines, 99-100 : Gaines' pamphlet and Scott's letter of denunciation, 100 ; Anonymous opinions, loi ; Death of Major General Brown and ap- pointment of Macomb to the command of the army, 103; Scott's protest, 104 ; his refusal to recognize Macomb as General-in-Chief, 104 ; he is re- lieved from command, 1(7 j memoralizes Congress, bu that body does not adopt his views, 117-1 23 ; Jackson elected President ; he relieves Scott from suspension from command and grants him a leave of absence, 123 ; Scott visits Europe, 123; Visits General Lafayette and receives from him some sound advice, 123-124 ; Scott returns to America and accepts the situation, 124; is assigned to the command of the Eastern Department, 125-126; Death of Macomb, and Scott appointed the Major General of the Army, 127 ; Further efforts by Gaines fiir the supremacy, 128 ; End of the strug- gle on the question of brevet rank, 128 to 131. CHAPTER VIL Re-organization of .the Army in 1821-22,132; Important que.stions growing out of brevets, 132; General Order of June i6th, 1827, on command ac- cording to brevet commission, T 32-3 ; Opinion of Attorney-General Ber- rien, 133; Aides-de-camp to bre>/et general officers, 133-4; Proposition in Congress to abolish brevets, 134 ; Secretary of War Porter's views, 134-5; General Orders of 1829 and 1830 in regard to regimental commissions and commissions by brevet, 135. - CONTENTS. CHAPTER VIII. Staff brevets as compared with brevets for service, 136-7 ; Case of Adjutant General Jones, 137 ; General Scott's opinion of staff brevets under act of 1813 as compared with brevets conferred under act of :8i2, 138 ; Attorney General Rush's opinion concerning them, 138; General Order of Septem- ber 7, 181 5, in regard to commissions in the Staff, 13S; Re-organization of April 24, 1816, 139; Proceedings of a Board of Olficers which convened at Philadelphia in March, 1830, to consider propriety of restoring, to their places in regiments, officers of the staff, 139-40; Reduction of 1821,140; Staff rank by brevet disappears from 1821 to 183S ; is again introduced in 1838 in the Adjutant General's Department ; totally abolished in 1861 , 140-41; Official reports in regard to staff brevets, &c., 141-143; Brevet rank in the Marine Corps, 143 ; Acts of 1814 and 1817, 143 ; Attorney Gen- eral's opinions, 143-44; Case of Captain Wainwright of the Marine Corps, &c., 144; Reduction of 1815: bestowal of brevets upon officers reduced in grades ; this species of brevets termed " Razee," 144 ; The method of operation, 144 : Cases of Atkinson, Bradford and Dallibi " razeed of- ficers," 144-5 i ^'^^ °f March 3, 1853, giving to Lieutenants of Engineers and Ordnance promotion for 14 years' continuous service as lieutenants, MS- CHAPTER IX. Brevets for " 10 years' service in any one grade," under act of July 6, 1812, 145-6; Opinions of Attorney-General Wirt, 146; Discussion as to whether "brevets on brevets" could be conferred under the act, 146-7 ; Report of Adjutant-General Jones to the Secretary of War in regard to offi- cers who had served lo years in one grade, 147-48 ; Action of the Senate in regard to the confirmation of brevets, 148; Law authorizing brevets for to years' service repealed in 1834, 151 ; Efforts of Colonel Jones to have the law restored in favor of certain officers, 152 ; Memorial of several officers in favor of the law, 152 ; Failure to get the law restored, r52-3. CHAPTER X. Black Hawk war in 1832, 153; Florida war 1835-42, 153; Brevet rank exer- cised by the Commanding Generals, 153; Regulations of 1835 and 1838, 153 ; Numerous recommendations for brevets for Florida war, 154; Secre- tary of War Wilkins' letter of January 31, 1845, to General Scott, and Scott's reply, 154-59 ; Views of the Senate on brevets, 160 to 61 ; Regula- tions of 1841 and 1847, 161-2 ; General Taylor's letter of October 9, 1845, to Adjutant-General as to the rights of brevet rank, 162-63 ! Adjutant-C5en- eral Jones' reply of November 17, 1845, to General Taylor, giving General Scott's views on the subject of brevet rank, 163-165 ; the celebrated " Cor- pus Christi Memorial" of December 11, 1845, 165-179; Memorial not acted on by Congress, 180; Subject disposed of by General Order of March 12, 1846, 180; Case of General Worth, 181 ; Questions of precedence between h'm and Colonel Twiggs, 181 ; Worth's claim to precedence on account of his brevet, 181 ; Taylor's decision in favor of Twiggs, 182 ; Worth's refusal to be governed by it, 182-3 ! ^^ tenders his resignation and asks for leave until its acceptance, 183; goes to Washington,i87 ; General Scott's remarks on the case, 187 ; the battle of Palo Alto, l88 ; Worth recalls his resignation, and asks to be permitted or ordered to return to the field of operations, 188 ; he returns to Texas and resumes the command he had relinquished, 188 ; 6 CONTENTS. Brevets of graduating cadets, 189 ; War with Mexico breaks out, 190 ; Promo- tion of General Taylor, 190 ; Acts of June 29, 1846, and March 3, 1847, increas- ing number of General Officers, iga-91 ; Close of Mexican war, 191 ; Lib- eral bestowal of brevets, 191 ; Volunteers in war with Mexico, 191-92 ; Appointments of General Officers, 192; Two volunteer Generals re- ceive brevets in the regular army, 192 ; Rights and privileges of bre- vet officers, 192 ; Secretary of War Crawford's report, 192-197 ; Board of officers convened in November, 1850, to consider subject of rank, 197 ; Report of Board, 197-201 ; General Order of January 18, 1851, in case of brevet Lieutenant-Colonel Cooke, 202; Revoked in 1855,202; Case of Captain Ketchum, 202, 203 ; Regulations of 1857, and General Scott's objections thereto, 203-208; Scott's brevet of Lieutenant-General in 1855, 208 ; Joint resolution of Congress, 208 ; Scott's claim for pay of brevet Lieutenant-General from March 29, 1847, 208 ; Antagonism of Jeffer- son Davis, Secretary of War, 208 ; Bitter correspondence between Davis and Scott, 208 ; Scott's triumph, 208, 209 ; Cases of Johnston and Andrews, 210 ; Their brevets as officers of additional regiments raised during the Mexican war, 210; Ruling of the War Department, 210; Johnston's protest, 210, 211 ; Adjutant-General Cooper's views in the case, 211, 213 ; Stability of brevet rank, 213 ; Staff brevets and brevets for service, 213 ; Case of Captain Henshaw, 214 ; Brevets in the Marine Corps, 215 ; Case of Captain Wainwright, 217-218; General review of the whole subject of brevet rank, 218-223; Case of J. C. Fremont, 223. , CHAPTER XL War of the Rebellion, 1861-5, 223 ; Condition of the army at its com- mencement, 223 ; Organization of volunteer forces, 224 ; Brevets over- whelmed and lost sight of, 224; Close of the war and re-appearance of brevets, 224 ; Lavish bestowal of them, 224 ; Boards of officers convened at Washington and St. Louis, to establish system in the bestowal of brevets, 225 ; Reports of Boards of Officers, 225-229 ; Dissatisfaction and confusion in the army from the numerous brevets, 230 ; Act of March 3, 1869, forbidding precedence or command to brevet rank except by special assign- ment, 230 ; Brevets only to be conferred in time of war, 230 ; Brevets to staff officers, 230-231 ; Act of July 15, 1870, forbidding officers to wear, on duty, uniform of brevet grade, 231 ; Practical disappearance of brevets from the army, 231 ; Case of Colonel Hunt, under the act of March 3, 1865, 231 ; Opin- ions of Court of Claims and Supreme Court of U. S., 232-234 ; Volunteer forces organized during the rebellion, 234 ; Act of March 3, 1863, authorizing bestowal of brevets upon volunteer officers, 234 ; Probable origin of the act, 234, 235 ; Act of March ■/., 1867, 235 ; Case of Private Stowe, Connecticut Volunteers, brevetted a 2d Lieutenant, 236; Acts of July 12, 1862, and March 3, 1863, authorizing bestov/al of " Medals of Honor," 236. APPENDIX, f A. — Definition and explanation of the term Rank, 239 ; B. — Extracts from reports of Commissions appointed by the British Govern- ment (in 1840), to inquire into Naval and Military promotion and retire- ment ; Evidence of Lieutenant-General Blakeney, 240-246; C. — Royal warrant of October 6, 1854, establishing rules for promotion and retirement of officers in the British Army, 247-253 ; D.— Resolution of Congress, of November 24, 1778, establishing rules as to rank and promotion in the Army of the United States, 254-256 ; CONTENTS. 7 E. — General Washington's letters to Congress during the revolution, 257 to 262; F Debate in February, 1751, on a clause in the (British) mutiny bill respect- ing half pay cificers, 260 ; Views o£ Sir George Littleton, 263-266 ; G. — Royal Warrant of October 30, 1871, regulating first appointments, Regi- mental promotion, exchanges, &c., 267-274 ; Explanatory memorandum of November i, 1871, accompanying Royal Warrant, 274-277 ; REGISTER. Names, rank, Sec, of all officers of the United States upon whom brevets have been conferred, with the nature of the services for which conferred, from the beginning of the Revolutionary War of 1776, until the present time — alpha- betically arranged, 279-576. ^ f The following table of Errata is issued by the publisher to accompany General J. B. Fry's " History of Brevets." It is due to the author, and to the publisher, to state that none of the errors in the Register, and but few of those in the text, appeared in the proof sheets of the work. After the proofs had / been returned to the printer, he, apparently for the purpose of securing uni- formity in the" face of the type, took out right letters and introduced wrong ones, or none at all. PageiOjInlast line of note, for " hierarchiquimente, " read " hierarchiquement. " Page 49, In note, for "Colonel Von Hylander, " read " Colonel Von Xy- lander." Page 53, In last line but one, for " was," read " as." Page 55, line 25, for " Setwart, " read "Stewart." Pages 56 and 58, for " Norimont." read " Noirmont." Pages 57 and 59, for " Majastram, " read " Mafastram." Pages 62 and 63, The first three lines of page 63 should properly appear as the first three lines of page 62. Page 174, Use 30, for "induce," read "include." Page 220, line 27, for "rate," read " fate." Page 214, line i, for "servitce," read " service." Pcge 293, (Register), for "Abbott, Henry L." read "Abbot, Henry L." Page 340, " for "Chaffee, Adna A. R." read "Chaffee, AdnaR." Page 370, " for " Dunstea, Edward S. " read " Dunster, Edward S." Page 372, " for " Eckerton, Theodore J." read "Eckerson, Theo- dore J." Page 381, " for " Frllett, Frederick M." read " FoUett, Frederick M." Page 391, " for " Giddinas, Grotius R." read " Giddings, Grotius R." Page 422, " The date of "original entry into service" of Bernard J. D. Irwin should read "August 28th, '56 " instead of "August 28th, '66." Page 423, " for " Jenni gs, Gilbert S." read "Jennings, Gilbert S." Page 443, " for "Loosley, Dalien," read " Loosley, Daniel." Page 461, " for "McKenzie, Thom sG." read " McKenzie, Thomas G." Pag 476, " for "Muhenberg, Charies P." read "Muhlenberg, Charles P. " Page 542, " forThorapso James," read " Thompson, James." Page 571, " for "Wood, El=a= D." read "Wood, Eleazer D." Page 575, " for " Wyse, Francis P." read "Wyse, Francis O." New York, D. VAN NOSTRAND, March 8th, 1877. Publisher. CHAPTER I. A brevet under the existing laws affecting the regular military service of the United States may be defined as a commission conferring upon an officer a grade in the army additional to and higher than that which, at the time it is bestowed, he holds by virtue of his commission in a particular corps of the legally established -militaty organization. It makes him eligible, with the rank it confers, for assignment to duty by the President in the army at large, but not in his own corps. In that corps he receives promotion only according to seniority, and performs duty only under his commission therein. Without such assignment by the President, a brevet has no effect on the officer's status. The brevet held by an officer in the United States Army, is bestowed in conformity with express law. It is in due form signed and sealed, and like other com- missions, expresses the rights it confers and the obligations it imposes. The quality of being incident to some other military grade is not an inherent characteristic of it, but is only a feature which it derives from the Act of 1812. With this commission alone, officers have, in numerous cases, exercised command, received and disbursed public funds, admin- istered law as members of general courts-martial, and drawn the pay and allowances in full of the grades which they held by brevet alone. The terms "full" rank,* "actual" rank, — "effective" rank, " real ' raiik, " ordinary " rank, etc., often used in contra- distinction to brevet rank, are apt to produce confusion, as all are " full," " actual," " effective," " real," and " ordinary." Yet it is convenient, if not necessary, to distinguish in brief terms between the grade in a regiment or corps and that in the army at large. Regiment and corps were long ago pronounced synonymous in this connection. Perhaps the desired distinction may be best made by using the terms corps grade and brevet grade. The difference between the two may be thus presented : — In • For an explanation o£ the word Rank, see Appendix A. 2 lO HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS evefry army there is a system of grades. In the military establish- ment of the United States the grades of general and lieutenant- general exist now, but expire as soon as vacated by the present incumbents. The permanent commissioned grades* are : 1. Major-general. 2. Brigadier-general. 3. Colonel. 4. Lieutenant-colonel. 5. Major. 6. Captain. 7. First lieutenant. 8. Second lieutenant. But in each grade there are different offices. For example, in the grade of major there are the offices of major of infantry, major of cavalry, major of engineers, major and assistant adju- tant-general, etc. These offices are held by virtue of corps com- missions. But besides these, there is also, in the grade of major, the office of major in the army at large, — in other words the office of major by brevet. Originally this office was as substantive and perfect in itself as the office of major in a corps. But in the military service of the United States, its substantive and independ- ent character has been abridged by legislation. The very fact, however, that its powers and privileges have been modified in this manner, is proof that they originally existed, and that they remain subject to such restrictions only as are imposed by the statutes. Under the law the brevet office can no longer be held by a person not already in the military service by virtue of a corps commission, but it still retains its character as an office, and may be called into active life by the President. Until this happens, the duties and privileges of the office are suspended. When it happens, it supersedes the corps office and that in turn becomes suspended. Reveniy Johnson, speaking of General Scott's brevet of lieutenant-general, says : " It was not only an honor, but as a com- pensation, that the office was to be conferred," and Attorney- general Gushing says, on the same subject, " General Scott holds, by lawful appointment and commission, the office of lieutenant- general by brevet in the Army of the United States." Brevets being commissions in the army conferred under express law, they can only be annulled in conformity with law. • The French call this system of grades " La Hierarchic," and instead of speaking, as we do, of transmitting a paper " through the proper military chan- nels," they use the expression "suivant les degrfe de la hierarchic," or "trans- mis hierarchiquimente." OF BREVETS. 11 From the very origin of the United States army, more than a hundred years ago, to the present day, brevet rank, though its powers and privileges have changed from time to time, has pre- served its hold upon the military system. During all of this long period its advantages and disadvantages have been matters of earnest discussion. At the headquarters of the army and at the war office it was for years an all-absorbing question. Its extravagant claims after the war of i8 12-14 brought about life- long hostility and discord between the two brigadier-generals who were continued in service after the army reductions which in due time followed that memorable contest. The failure of the claim set up in 1828 to the permanent command of the entire army by virtue of it, very nearly drove from the public service one of the ablest and most distinguished military leaders that the United States have ever produced, and in deference to it a distinguished officer, in whose memory a monument now stands conspicuously in New York city, unwittingly turned his back upon Palo Alto and Resaca, — battle fields upon which one-half of the victorious army was commanded by his rival and the other half by his successor. The code of army regulations, promulgated in 1857 by Jefferson Davis, then secretary of war, opened with the impressive announce- ment that " Superiors of every grade are forbid to injure those under them by tyrannical or capricious conduct or by abusive language" Yet the brevet of lieutenant-general held by General Scott gave rise to a quarrel between him and the secretary of war, which for the ingenuity and bitterness of its " abuse " is unsurpassed in the annals of official military correspondence. But while General Scott had to defend his own high brevet of lieutenant-general, as he years before defended that of major-general, he was compelled, as Washington had been before him, to deal also with grave ques- tions involving the' rights of brevet second lieutenants. The subject of brevet rank embraced in the first articles of war for the army of the United States which were copied almost liter- ally from the British and adopted by the Continental Congress, June 30, 1775 — has not only remained in the articles through all of their changes, but has been the subject of many special acts of Congress. It has engaged the attention of the attorney-general, the secretary of the treasury, and the President, and has been be- fore the court of claims and the supreme court of the United States. Attended with evils and abuses which have disturbed the har- mony, and at times the efficiency, of the service, the retention of brevets has been due probably to the fact that, practically speak- ing, they have been the only special reward for gallant, distin- guished, or meritorious services, by commissioned officers of the army, and that, never expensive, they, now cost nothing. Yet 12 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS they have to a fair degree served the purpose of those military orders and titulary honors which various countries employ to stimulate military pride and reward the zeal, ability, and gallantry of their soldiers. . Beginning in the colonies in 1775, they were in full force during the revolution, but were practically suspended from that time until the second war of independence. Firmly established by the act of July 6th, 1812, authorizing the President to confer brevet rank on such officers of the army as might distinguish themselves, &c., this species of promotion reach- ed its maturity under the care of General Scott, its ablest arid most zealous defender, about the time of the war with Mexico, in which it was used as a means of high command. It served no useful purpose as a system of command during the war of the rebellion, and that great contest certainly resulted in its decline. Though still suffered to exist it has, in the United States, now lost nearly all the effective elements of vitality. Its immediate value to those who received it has consisted mainly in the relative importance it tended to establish among Ofificers on account of past services. This value was greatly depreciated by the inflation — the repeated unnecessary and undeserved issues of it, which took place at the close of the late war. Against this abuse many timely warnings were given by those in power, notably by Mr. Wilkins, secretary of war in 1845. He said, " the value of the brevet commission must very much depend upon the use made by the government of the power of conferring it. And whilst that value can be much enhanced by the caution with which the honor is bestowed, it may be rendered so cheap by its common and lavish distribution, as no longer to be deemed an object of high and noble ambition." But with all its advantages for purposes of special command, and however valuable and desirable it may be as a means of reward, brevet rank, as we have it, has always been and must continue to be attended with evils that are absolutely unavoidable whenever commissions, in two different grades, each conferring eligibility to command, may be held by an officer at the same time. Nothing is more fruitful of disorder in the military service than doubts and disputes in regard to rank and rights to command, and nothing is more fertile in producing these doubts and disputes than a system of double commissions, which, in the case of brevets, has tended to impair the effective organization of the army in proportion to the inherent right of authority conceded from time to time to the brevet commission. It is exceedingly difficult to use, without abusing, a system of brevet promotions. OF BREVETS. 1 3 Legislation has put a check in the United States service to the abuses, but it has done so only by taking the vitality out of the higher of the two commissions which the government confers upon the oiScer. Mr. Clay once said in the Senate, that "honors by military men are more highly appreciated than pay " — the laws have taken from brevet rank a part of its honor and all of its pay. The legislation contributing to the present crippled condition of this once favored feature of the military system, was not brought about solely by any real mischief it did in the service, nor by its too lavish bestowal, but was due, in some degree at least, to the offence which a display of the honor gave. The spectac- ular effect of its insignia was too extended and dazzling for the eye, and the ear could not endure its high-sounding titles when applied to men in the army. This is rather a novel circumstance taken in connection with the fact that out of the army, the grand- est military titles and the gayest trappings are open to all, are assumed by many, and are looked upon with favon The latest laws on the subject, retroactive in their operation, supplementing those cutting off all pay and allowances, forbid officers in their official capacities from wearing the uniform or being addressed by the titles of their brevet grades. That is to say, having received these rewards, of no pecuniary value what- ever, for gallant, distinguished, or meritorious services to the nation, the receipt of which is acknowledged in the certificate, the recipient of the reward is forbidden to make the usual exhibi- tion of it. It may therefore be said that this inducement provided by the laws of the United States, as a special reward for gallant, distin- guished or meritorious conduct on the part of officers of the army, has become almost valueless. Although brevets still exist in name they have lost the privileges which were worth claiming, the rights which were worth exercising, and the honors which were worth contending for. They are occasionally called into opera- tion for purposes of command, but this is done solely for the advantage or convenience of the government, and not for the benefit of the officers holding them. , From the earliest times, special and substantial rewards for notably gallant deeds and highly distinguished conduct, have been regarded as essential parts of the military systems. Whether this feature shall remain practically expunged from the military service of the United States, or if restored, what form it shall take, are questions well worth the careful consideration of the law-makers. 14 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS CHAPTER II. Brevet is. derived from the Latin, breve, brevia, words still preserved in English law meaning a brief ; a parchment contain- ing a notification ; a writ or mandatory precept issued in the name of the Sovereign or State. In early days in France, as well as in other European countries, when the King wanted armies he called for troops upon his feudal lords who were sovereign within their territories. They raised their respective contingents and appointed the officers but could confer on them no authority outside of their respective forces. For the sake of efficiency and harmony it became neces- sary when these contingents were brought together, for the King, the common superior, to confer, first upon the superior officers, and finally upon all, his letters patent rendering them eligible to command according to rank throughout the entire army. Thus all officers came to serve in .the French army by virtue of the King's letters patent, or brevet. Duane, in his Military Dictionary, published in 1810, says : " Brevet Fr. Commission, appointment." " Under the old government of France it consisted in letters or appointments signed by the King by virtue of which every officer was authorized to discharge his particular duty. All officers in the old French service, from a cornet or sub-lieutenant up to a Marshal of France were styled Officiers a'Brevet." This is the same as the definition given by James, in his Military Dictionary, printed in London in 1805. Hoyt's Military Dictionary, pub- lished in Massachusetts in 18 10, says, '^Brevet rank, a rank in the army higher than that under which an officer does duty in his corps '' Referring to the system of promotion formerly observed in the British service, James further defines Brevit as a term express- ive of " promotion in the army from the rank of captain upwards, without additional pay until it reaches to the rank of Major Gen- eral who is now entitled to a quarterly allowance." There is ample authority for saying that in French, the word, as used in a general sense, means any warrant granted by the sovereign or state to an individual, making him eligible to per- form the duty to which the warrant refers. As used in the military service it means Commission, the parch- ment containing the authority of the chief of the state for the officer to perform his functions. There is no other form of com- OF BREVETS. 1 5 mission in the French military service than the one styled Brevet. But in the consular branch of their civil service, there is a dis- tinction between the words Commission and Brevet. ' The warrant or document given as evidence of office to Consuls, is called a commissiori ; whereas that given to vice-consuls is called a Brevet. These instruments differ somewhat in phraseology ; the brevet being the briefest. The consular office conferred by the brevet is subordinate to that conferred by the commission. Both the commissions of the Consuls and the Brevets of the Vice-Consuls sent to this country from France in 1784, just after the close of our revolutionary, war, were signed by the King and countersigned by his minister of foreign affairs ; but the practice now is, for the French Sovereign to sign only the Commissions of the Consuls and the Consuls sign and issue to their Vice-Consuls, Brevets according to a form prescribed by the Government. The papers called " Brevets " and " Commissions " are sub- stantially the same in the military service of the United States as well as in that of Great Britain. They are in foAn as follows : — (FORM OF BREVET, BRITISH SERVICE.) George R. George the Third by the Grace of God, King of Great Britain, France, and Ireland, Defender of the Faith, &c.. To our Trusty and Well-Beloved Captain William Martin of our Royal Regiment of Artillery, Greeting. We, repos- ing especial Trust and Confidence in your Loyalty, Cour- age and good Conduct, do by these Presents, constitute and appoint you to be Major in Our Army, and We do, hereby, give and grant you full Power and authority to command and take your Rank accordingly. You are, therefore, carefully and diligently to discharge the duty of Major by doing and performing all, and all manner of Things therewith belonging: And we do, hereby, Command all Our Officers and Soldiers, whom it may concern to acknowledge and obey you as Major as afore- said. And you are to observe and follow such Orders and i6 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS Directions, from Time to Time, as you shall receive from Us, or any of your superior Officers, according to the Rules and Discipline of War, in pursuance of the Trust. We hereby repose in You. Given at our Court, at St. James's, the Twenty-Third Day of July, 1772, in the Twelfth Year of Our Reign. By His Majesty's Command, SUFFOLK. Entered with the Secretary at War, M. LARIS. Captain William Martin, of the Royal Regiment of Artillery, to have the rank of Major in the Army. (FORM OF COMMISSION, BRITISH SERVICE.) George R. George the Second by the Grace of God, King of Great Britain, France, and Ireland, Defender of the Faith, &c.. To Our Trusty and Well-Beloved William Martin, Esq., # * # * * Greeeting. We, reposing especial Trust and Confidence in your Loyalty, Courage and Good Conduct, Do by these Pres- ents, constitute and appoint you to be one of the Captains in Our Royal Regiment of Artillery, whereof 2.f. 6ei. 2 J. Sd. 2S. (>d. OF BREVETS. 1/ Our Master-General of the Ordnance for the time being is Colonel Commander-in-Chief. You are therefore care- fully and diligently to discharge the Duty of a Captain in the said Regiment by duly exercising all the Officers, Bombardiers, Gunners and Mattrosses under your com- mand, in the use of Mortars and the art of Gunnery, and to keep them in good Order and Discipline ; and they are hereby required to obey you as their Captain, and you are to observe and follow such Orders and Di- rections as you shall from time to time receive from Us, Our Master-General of the Ordnance for the time being, the Lieuten ant-General and Principal Officers of the same, the Commanding Officer of Our said Regiment, or any other, your superior Officer, according to the Rules and Discipline of War, in pursuance of the Trust hereby reposed in you. Given at Our Court of St. James's * * the Second * * Day of April * * ^7S7j i'^ ^^^ Thirtieth Year of Our Reign. By His Majesty's Command, MARLBOROUGH. Entered in the Office of Ordnance this 7th day of April I7S7- W. R. EARLE, CI. Ordnce. No. 2. William Martin, Esq., * * * Captain in the Royal Regiment of Artillery. Entered p. 364. FORM OF A BREVET, U. S. SERVICE. The President Of the United States of America To all who shall see these presents, greeting : Know Ye, That I do hereby confer on of the Army of the United States, by and with the ad- vice and consent of the Senate, the rank of bv Brevet, in said Armv, to rank as such from the Il8 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS day of in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and for having by his skill and valor, defeated with inferior numbers, a numerous and well appointed army of the enemy in the battle of and I do strictly charge and re- quire all officers and soldiers under his command to obey and respect him accordingly ; and he is to observe and follow such orders and directions, from time to time, as he shall receive from me, or the future President of the United States of America, and other officers sqt over him, according to law, and the rules and discipline of War. This Commission to continue in force during the pleasure of the President of the United States for the time being. Given under my hand, at the city of Washing ■ ■ Seal of the ! ^o"^ ^^'^ ^^Y °^ > '" ^^^ Y^^^ °f °^^ : : : Lord one thousand eight hundred and twenty- : : War Office. : four, and in the forty-eighth year of the Independ- ence of the United States. By the President, JAMES MONROE. J. C. CALHOUN, Secretary of War. FORM OF A COMMISSION, U. S. SERVICE. The President Of the United States of America. To all who shall see these presents, greeting : Know Ye, that reposing especial trust and confidence in the patriotism, valor, fidelity and abilities of I have nominated, and by and with the advice and con- sent of the Senate, do appoint him in the service of the United States, to rank as such from the day of eighteen hundred and He is therefore carefully and diligently to discharge the duty of by doing and performing all manner of things thereunto belonging. And I do strictly charge and require all officers and OF BREVETS. 1 9 soldiers, under his command, to be obedient to his orders as and he is to observe and follow such orders and directions from time to time as he shall receive from me or the future President of the United States of America, or the General, or other superior officers set over him, according to the rules and discipline of war. This Commission to continue in force during the pleasure of the President of the United States for the time being. ■ Given under my hand, at the City of Washing- Seal of the '■ ton, this day of , and in the year of our : Lord, one thousand eight hundred and , and War Office ; in the year of the Independence of the United • States. By the President, JAMES MADISON. JAMES MONROE, Secretary of War. The character of these papers is therefore substantially the same ; both of them in our service being termed on their faces " Commissions." Secretary of War Porter, however, in the discussion of General Scott's claims in 1828, argued that there was a marked difference between the phraseology of a regular commission and a brevet, consisting in this, the "former enjoins it on the person to whom it is directed, carefully and diligently to discharge the duties of (the office to which he is appointed), by doing and per- forming all manner of things thereunto belonging," while the latter " simply confers the rank of the office by brevet without referring to the office itself or any specific duties that are attached to it,' the point made seeming to be that the Commission conferred an office while the brevet did not, or, if it did, it was an office with- out duties attached. But this view of the Secretary of War was not affirmed by the Military Committee of either House of Congress, both having considered the subject ; nor was it adopted by the President in his decision on the claim of General Scott, on which the Secretary's argument was made. The conclusion arrived at, as indicated by the general practice of our army, was, that, although brevets became active only on services of a special and temporary nature and some of them only at the will of a higher commander, and that they gave authority which was limited both in its scope and object, yet in this reserv- ed way, they conferred office and duty, and imposed due military obligation. 20 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS Scott went so far as to claim that a brevet was better than another Commission, for the reason that the latter, as is expressed on its face, was conferred only on account of " special trust and confidence entertained (by anticipation) in the patriotism, valor, fidelity, and abilities " of the individual who received it, whereas the brevet is bestowed for extraordinary exhibitions which have been already made of the same virtues and qualities. In one of his elaborate papers on the subject of brevet rank, General Scott says : " In the British army the noun brevet was bor- rowed more than a century ago, and used adjectively, to make brevet-rank signify rank acquired by length of service, gallant actions or other meritorious conduct in contradistinction to reg- imental rank purchased with money," and in describing the system of promotion in the British army by purchase, and by brevet, he endeavored to show that the name given in the latter was because the method it involved was a shorter cut to advancement than that of the former, and he said " hence, from the brnnty of this process, compared with the numerous forms, certificates and agencies with which the sale and purchase of regimental commis- sions are burdened, the term brevet-rank, in accordance with the primitive word brevetum," (short), and he added, speaking of rank acquired in this way, " the brevity of the process not at all affecting the validity of the acquisition." But, as will hereafter appear, brevet rank was introduced into the British army more than seventy years before the process appeared which General Scott describes. As its bestowal was on a civilian, to command as Colonel of Dragoons, it can hardly be said that it was intro- duced for the purpose of signifying rank acquired by length of service, gallant actions, &c., in contradistinction to regiTnental rank. This ingenious and well-put theory must therefore refer to the later applications of the word, and not to its introduction. Regiments were originally raised in the English service by noblemen at their own expense. Practically speaking, the man who raised the regiment, owned it and bestowed its offices to help pay its cost. These regiments, officers and all, were adopted by the king ; he commissioned the officers, but still their authority was limited to their own regiments, and there was a lack of gen- eral control where different commands were brought together. At the time that " Brevet Rank" originated in 1692, the service was emerging from a state of chaos resulting, among other things, from the want of general authority above mentioned. The regu- lar army had just begun its existence. In 1685, it consisted of nine thousand men. " The discipline," says Macaulay, " was lax, and indeed could not be otherwise. The common law of Eng- land knew nothing of courts martial and made no distinction OF BREVETS. 21 in time of peace between a soldier and any other subject, nor could the government then venture to ask even the most loyal parliament for a mutiny bill. A soldier, therefore, for knock- ing down his colonel incurred only the ordinary penalties of assault and battery, and by refusing to obey orders, by sleeping on guard, 6r by deserting his colors, incurred no legal penalty at all." James the Second increased the regular army to twenty thou- sand men, and subsequently to forty thousand, but still he was without power to enforce discipline or order in it, or, as Macaulay says, referring to the condition of aiifairs in 1687, " The King had scarcely formed that army on which he chiefly depended for the accomplishment of his designs, when he found that he could not himself control it. When war was actually raging in the kingdom, a mutineer or a deserter might be tried by a military tribunal and executed by the provost marshal. But there was now profound peace. The common law of England having sprung up in an age when all men bore arms occasion- ally, and none constantly, recognized no distinction in time of peace between a soldier and any other subject, nor was there any act resembling that by which the authority necessary for the government of regular troops is now confided to the Sovereign." The first record of the office of general officer conferred by commission in the British service was in the army just mentioned as created by James the Second. That Sovereign, in 1685, com- missioned two officers as major-generals, and five as brigadiers. It appears that prior to that time " the employment of an officer as a general was authenticated by a letter of service issued to him by the Secretary at War acting on the orders of the Cabinet," and that only regimental officers were commissioned. This addition of commissioned grades, begun by James the Second, was continued by William the Third in 1689, and in the course of five or six years from that time he made the grades of general and lieutenant-general, added brigadiers, and placed a number of foreign officers in high positions in the British army. Throughout his reign there were noblemen and gentlemen serv- ing in the arm)% in some instances, without pay, and in others with- out commissions, and the first Mutiny Act, passed in 1689, hold- ing liable to its provisions only " persons mustered and in pay as officers or soldiers," was subsequently altered so as to embrace both these classes by substituting " or " for " and," making the article read " mustered or paid," etc. In this condition of the military service of Great Britain, William the Third created Brevet Rank. When in Flanders, in 1692, he conferred upon Francis Hawley (May loth) a Brevet to command as colonel of dragoons, and subsequently conferred 22 HISTORY . AND LEGAL EFFECTS brevets on two other civilians to command as colonels, and upon a lieutenant to command as a captain. This was the origin of that Brevet Rank which has always existed in our service and which is the subject of this history. Atthetime spoken of, the number of offi- cers in the organization of regiments and corps was defined, and the warrant or evidence of office in them was called a commission. But the document by which all officers in the French service, from a sub- lieutenant to a field marshal, exercised authority was called a Brevet, and it is probable that the name for the new form of com- mission at large in the English army, introduced by William the Third as mentioned above, was taken by him from the French, to distinguish it from the Commission in regiments, which had been the only one known up to the time of James the Second. It is worthy of remark that although brevet rank is now, and has long been, accepted as meaning rank in the army at large — rank creating eligibility to command one branch of service as well as another — yet the first " brevet " ever conferred was for the limited purpose of " command as colonel of dragoons." So far as can be gathered from the imperfect history existing on the subject, brevets were originally resorted to in the British ser- vice, not as a means of reward for officers already in the army, but for the purpose of securing services which could not otherwise be obtained. It will be seen, in a subsequent chapter, that they were introduced into our service with the same object, and in a similar manner to that in which the British first resorted to them. That is to say they were in the first instance conferred upon per- sons having no military rank on which to base them, as we have fallen into the habit of terming it. Brevets have so long been a constant and important feature in the British service, that an account of the general system of pro- motion in the British army is necessary to a proper understanding of them. In 1735, George the Second introduced the grade of field mar- shal into the British service, and laid the foundation of a system of promotion to that and the different grades of general officers ; the number in each of these grades being limited only by the will of the Sovereign. From 1783 to 1793 the lowest number of gen- eral officers in service in any one year was 157 and the highest 188. All of the incumbents of these offices attained their posi- tions by promotion according to seniority, and the whole operation of carrying them and some subordinates up one grade was called issuing " a brevet." Used in this connection the word brevet has a larger meaning than when used in relation to brevet rank con- ferred for special purposes or distinguished services, and in Great Britain general promotion by a brevet applied to the navy and marine corps as well as to the army. OF BREVETS. 23 The first general promotion through the issuing of a brevet took place in 1760. ,5 The system was established by the war between Great Britain and France which began in 1793. Royal warrants or orders confer- ring general promotion — brevets — were issued in nearly every year up to 18 14. Thereafter they were granted every four or five years at the pleasure of the Sovereign. They gave one grade of promo- tion to all officers from captain to general, inclusive of the ex- treme grades named. They increased the expenses, but it does not appear that the House of Commons ever refused to vote the supplies. The fact that the lieutenant-colonels of 1793 were made colonels in 1796, and major-generals in 1802, illustrates the rapiditywith which promotion was made under this system. But whilst all were promoted, only a part of the general officers thus obtained, were fit for the duties of their new positions. Those who were considered most competent, and whose services were desired, were assigned to duty, and received full pay. The others, on reduced pay, remained unattached, to be called upon if want- ed. They were, however, still in the line of promotion by any subsequent " brevet," provided they at certain intervals offered their services in conformity with regulations governing on the subject. The question of conferring these general promotions was a public measure decided on by the cabinet in consultation with the commander-in-chief of the army. The Sovereign's war- rant announced the scope of the brevet and it was carried out under instructions from the office of the commander-in-chief. It might advance all a grade, or limit the advancement to those who had served a specified length of time in the grade they were holding when the brevet was issued. Although the operation of making these promotions was called a brevet, those who became general officers under it were not brevets in addition to some- thing else as with us. In fact brevet rank, as we understand it, is limited in the British service to the regimental grades of major, lieut. -colonel, and colonel. There is no higher brevet rank than brevet colonel. There was no doubling of commissions in the case of general officers as there is in our army. A major-general could not be that and something else at the same time (a brevet lieutenant-general for example), and hence among them no questions such as we have had to deal with be- tween the " regular " rank and " brevet " rank of general officers could arise ; and hence also the British legal restriction upon brevet commands, adopted by us, for officers of the line, did not embrace, because they had no application to, general officers. It is worthy of special note in this connection that although " a brevet " gave promotion to officers of the navy as well the army there was no such thing as " brevet-rank " in the navy. 24 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS Having attained the rank of general officer, a valuable thing in the British service is the colonelcy of a regiment, as that posi- tion gives pay and perquisites without exacting any actual duty in return. In the British service generally the highest regimental office in the regular line of promotion is lieutenant-colonel. To this grade, which is the real head of the regiment, pt-omotions are made by the commander-in-chief. The office of colonel is somewhat of the same nature as that of general, that is to say it is an office which may be held in the service at large, and, under the old system of general promotion, it was filled by the advance- ment of lieutenant-colonels to the grade of colonels in the army, unde'r the same brevet that carried colonels up to the grade of major-generals (the grade of brigadier being only a local or exceptional one). In one of his reports the Duke of Wellington said, " it must be observed that the grant of the rank of colonel, whether by brevet, or by commission of colonel of a regiment, opens to the grantee the door to command and to all the honor and emoluments of the profession." Although the grant of the rank of colonel opened the door to them, command and emoluments did not necessarily attach to the rank of colonel. Officers after reaching that grade might be unattached on half pay of their grade, or assigned to staff duty, receiving the full staff pay in addition to half pay, or they might command certain regiments. The system of making and advancing general officers by the principle of seniority by issuing "a ^r^j"!?/," has undergone fre- quent examination by the British Parliament, notably in 1833, 1840, 1850 and 1854. The system of promotion in the British army in 1838, is succinctly stated by the following letter of lieu- tenant-general Lord Fitzroy Somerset to a committee of Par- liament : — " The manner in which the whole of the military system is car- ried into effect, in so far as can be shown in writing, will be best explained in the following detail : " The establishment of the army being determined on by the Crown, and voted by Parliament, it is not in the power of the commander-in-chief to increase or to diminish the number of the officers or to alter the proportion of each rank. The regimental promotions, therefore, can, in no case, exceed the number of officers voted in the army estimates. " Regimental promotion may be obtained in two modes, viz. : by purchase and without purchase, according as vacancies occur, and army promotions may be granted in a third mode by brevet, a commission which carries with it military rank and command, but does not necessarily remove the officer thus promoted from OF BREVETS. 2$ his regimental position, unless when it advances an officer to the rank of major-general. "promotions by purchase. " It is believed that from the earliest period of which any mil- itary records are preserved, the practice has existed in the British army of allowing an inferior officer to purchase of a superior upon the latter retiring from duty and relinquishing the military service. " It is certain that such a system has been recognized in regu- lations which date as far back as the reign of Charles II. (of which proof can be adduced to the commission if required) and has been maintained down to the present time, as shown by authorized reports from boards of general officers specially sum- moned at intervals, under regal command, to revise the regulations on this subject. "The last of these regulations, dated in August, 1821, is sub- joined for the information of the commission. It fixes the price which is considered by the board to be a sufficient compensation to the seller on relinquishing his appointment and retiring from the service. This compensation, in accordance with long estab- lished practice, is pg-id by the officers who are promoted to his commission or in his succession. " For more than 100 years it has been held that an officer who desired to retire by sale, should be allowed to receive the value of those commissions he purchased, however short might be the period of his service ; and by a regulation, dating from the time of Queen Anne, the claim of an officer to retire by sale, who had purchased none of his commissions, is also recognized on the condition only that he had rendered a certain period of service in the army. " According to the last regulations on this subject, the periods of service required to give a title to this privilege are, 20 years for a field officer or captain, 15 years for a lieutenant, 12 years for an ensign ; one-half of which must have been passed upon full pay, or in the performance of military duties. " Modifications of this scale of service have occasionally been permitted by the commander-in-chief, but they have been made from consideration of peculiar circumstances in an officer's case, or with a view to facilitate public arrangements, such as the reduc- tion of the half-pay list, and must be taken as exceptions to the rule establishing the quantum of service required. " To enable the commander-in-chief to decide with justice upon the relative claims of regimental officers to purchase promotion, returns are received periodically from every regiment showing the 26 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS names of the officers of each rank who are desirous of purchasing advancement, and the reference they give for the necessary funds to effect their object. These returns are certified by the com- manding officer, who, moreover, states whether the officers so desirous of purchasing promotion are fit- and qualified for the advancement they seek. " From the large number of purchasing officers in the army, a retirement by sale is generally allowed in the regiment to which the officer belongs, and the senior of the next rank prepared to purchase is promoted to succeed him who retires. "To ensure a sufficient knowledge of his duty in the officer to be promoted, His Royal Highness, the late Duke of York, pre- scribed certain periods of service as the minimum of each rank. These periods are : six years to become a field officer,' two years to become a captain. It is not, however, to be understood that an officer having completed the required period of service will, as a matter of course, obtain the promotion on an opportunity offer- ing. Upon this the commander-in-chief always exercises his own discretion and judgment on a comparison of the merits and ser- vices of the respective claimants. " It must be distinctly understood that the purchase of a com mission- does not confer upon the officer the .power or the right to sell it, but with the sanction of the Crown, which can only be ob- tained on the recommendation of the commander-in-chief. - The commission is not therefore a personal property to be disposed of at the pleasure of the holder, but it is a military appointment, held, like all other military offices, at the pleasure of the Crown, and under the direct authority of the royal prerogative. " PROMOTION WITHOUT PURCHASE. " The promotion without purchase can only arise, as before stated, from the casualties of the service, or by an authorized aug- mentation of the establishment, and are made on the recommen- dation of the commander-in-chief to the Crown, not by right in the same regiment in which the vacancies occur, although from the merits and services of the senior officer of each rank, they are generally given regimentally. In 1834, the services and urgent claims of the officers of the army so far exceeded the ordinary means of promotion, that the crown was advised to confer upon the effective officers a portion of the vacant commissions which occurred upon the non-effective list, and the royal warrant, which was issued to this effect, bearing date 27th October, 1834, copy of which is annexed, empowered the commander-in-chief to make one promotion to an unattached or half-pay commission for OF BREVETS. 27 every, three casualties that occurred on the retired full-pay and half pay lists. " In selecting the officers for this promotion from the effective force, the commander-in-chief has. been governed principally by the length of service actually performed by the officer during the period of his employment' on full pay. PROMOTION BY BREVET. " Brevet promotion is regulated by seniority, and no officer who has sold out of the army but has been permitted to retain his rank as an honorary distinction, is eligible to promotion. " The ranks to which officers may be promoted by brevet are : — " Major. " Lieutenant-colonel. " Colonel. " Major-general. " Lieutenant-general. "General, and 1 " Field marshal. " The qualification for the first rank is, that the captain selected for it must be upon full pay regimentally, or if upon half pay, in a staff or garrison appointment. " The major to be lieutenant-colonel would be promoted if upon full pay, or even upon half pay, if he had done duty in that rank or if he had made an offer of his services since his last ap- pointment, provided he had not received the difference when he retired upon half pay. The promotion of a lieutenant-colonel to be colonel, and of a colonel to be major-general, is regulated in the same manner. The major-general to be lieutenant-gen- eral and the lieutenant-general to be general, are the seniors of their respective ranks, without reference to service or offers of service. " The promotion to the rank of field marshal is a matter of special arrangement and favor. A step of brevet rank is also conferred by the crown on the recommendation of the comman- der-in-chief for special service, and on appointment to particular staff situations. "retirement upon full pay. "The arrangement under which an officer may be allowed to retire upon full pay will be best explained on reference to the royal warrant of 1830, from which it will be seen that the officers 28 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS upon active service have not yet derived any advantage from the warrant, nor are likely to do so for some years to come. "retirement upon half pay. " Retirement upon half pay is effected by exchange with officers already upon the half pay list, at the discretioa of the commander- in chief. " The retirement to half pay, unless the service has been long, or ill-health contracted on duty be the cause, is temporary only, a pledge being exacted from the officer retiring that he will be forthcoming for service at the .expiration of the limited period. ' In 1783 a regulation was established on the report of a Board of General Officers, of retiring upon half pay, receiving what is called the difference, that difference being a part of the purchase money of the commission. No period of service has been defined as sufficient to give a claim to this indulgence, but it has been held by the military authorities that the title should be acquired by service. " This sum is paid by the officer selected from the half pay list for the situation on full pay, and is graduated for each rank ac- cording to a scale laid down in the regulations of 1821. " The receipt of the difference entails upon the officer a positive disqualification for military employment of any description what- ever. " In carrying into effect the system of military promotion as above described, it should be stated that the two governing principles which regulate every part of these details are, first, that no officer however deserving, shall be promoted, without purchase, over the head of his senior regimental officer in the same regiment ; sec- ondly, that no officer shall be promoted, by purchase, over the head of his senior regimental officer, provided that such senior officer has stated his claim conformably with the regulation to that purpose. " Nor can any such supersession of a senior be permitted to take place indirectly through the medium of another regiment. " From the foregoing statement of facts, it will be seen that the principle which governs the promotion of the British army through- out every rank, and under all circumstances, is briefly thus : — "• Selection by the crown under the regulations above described, from the first promotion to lieutenant to that of lieutetiant-colonel, zxid from the rank of lieutenant-colonel upwards, the promotion is by seniority, and known to the army under the denomination z thought, from the lower rank, merely in respect to the quesiion of pay and emoluments and that of his retention in the army." The claim is made a little plainer by the following from the body of his argument : — " I have shown, then, that bre^iet Major-General Gaines (like myself) is equally a major-general with Major-General Brown. In OF BREVETS. lOI respect to the rights of rank or command the only difference be- tween them is in the dates of their commissions. As to the words ' brevet ' and ' by brevet ' they are applied merely to show that General Gaines (like myself) is retained in service as a brigadier- general ; that he is borne on the army register as such (with the rank and date as major-general opposite his name) and, that he is, under special provisions of law to be paid as a brigadier when not placed over a body of troops equal to a division. These are the points of difference between Major-General Brown and Major- General Gaines, or between the former and myself ; in other words, between an ordinary commission and a brevet commis- sion." Gaines dissented from these propositions. The difference be- tween the two generals was succinctly stated by a clever anony- mous writer of the times, as follows : — " General Scott contends that the restrictions imposed by this article (6ist) on the exercise of brevet rank, are confined solely to regimental officers having brevets of a prior date to those of the regiment in which they serve, and in nowise affects the operation of brevets held by generals, or other officers, having no regimental rank. " General Gaines, on the contrary, thinks this article restrictive of all brevets, by viewing the term corps used in said article not only as synonymous with the term regimmt but as comprehending the whole army as one corps ; a definition authorizing the conclusion that as ' officers having brevets of a prior date to those of the regiment in which they serve ' can only take place in courts-martial, and on detachments when composed of different corps, according to the rank given them in their brevets a fortiori, General officers attached to the army as one corps cannot take place according to the rank given them in their brevets." The 6ist article of war (act of 1806) is the first law regulating the rights of brevet officers to rank and command. This article contemplates only the brevets held by officers of regiments, troops, or companies, and (as General Scott claimed) it restricted only that class, and so far as it conferred any right to command, it con- ferred it on those officers alone, and not on generals who belonged to no regiment or corps. As stated in preceding chapter although the process of promot- ing general officers in the British service was called " a brevet," the officers were in reality " generals " and not " brevet generals " as we understand the terms. That is to say, they did not hold two offices, the lower by " commission " and the higher " by brevet," as ours did and may now. In the British service therefore the article of war from which we took our 6ist applied only to regi- I02 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS mental officers because "brevets" were not conferred on any others. When we brevetted our generals, that is gave them double commissions, we introduced a state of things which did not obtain in the British service and to which our borrowed article of war (6 1 St) had no application. Scott therefore had to deduce his right to command, as brevet major-general, from some other source, and as there was no specific act in his favor, he labored to establish the general proposition that command necessarily followed rank, that brevet rank was rank, and that having the brevet rank of major-general, he must command as major-general and command all who had not a prior date as major-general to his date of brevet major-general. He was never able to establish these diffi- cult propositions, but they occupied the serious attention of the government, until he ceased by promotion to be concerned in them. The framers of the law (6ist article 1806) certainly did not foresee the claim that General Scott set up under it. It is a very reasonable theory that so far as the law-makers intended to confer authority by brevet rank, they only designed to enlarge the scope of ofScers whose commands were, by their commissions, restricted ordinarily to regiments and companies, and give them in certain cases a general authority which they did not otherwise possess, and that they did not design to enlarge the authority of general officers whose power extended over all branches of service, as well by their ordinary commissions as by their brevets. Samuel in his treatise, says in commenting on brevet rank in the British army, " brevet rank or command, for they are mutative terms, is declared to be effectual for every military purpose in the army at large, but of no avail in the regiment to which the officers holding it belong, unless it shall, in all or in part, be mixed or ~ united for a temporary purpose with some other corps." Hough's Practice of British Courts Martial is to the same effect. But the brevet rank they are speaking of is held only by officers of regiments or corps and not Toy general officers. The double commissions of general officers in our service gave rise to all the trouble. As British generals have only one commission no similar question arose among them. There was no parallel between the commissions in the two services and no applicability in the pre- cedents concerning general officers in the British service, so fre- quently put forward as arguments in favor of brevet rank in our army. It is true that a general officer in the British service may hold the colonelcy of one or more regiments, but this is not a genuine case of double commissions. These military absurdities, British OF BREVETS. IO3 colonelcies, are merely nominal offices, continued as perquisites for the favored holders. «■ General Scott makes an argument of the battle of Vimiera. Lieutenant-General. Wellesley (Wellington) commenced the battle ] while it was going on Lieutenant-General Bullard, who ranked Wellington, arrived, but from feelings of delicacy declined to in- terfere, but before all the advantages were reaped Lieutenant- General Dalrymple, who ranked both Wellington and Bullard, came up, and as General Scott expresses it, " assumed by the seniority of his brevet the general command," and, to enforce a parallel, adds, "all three of the individuals belonged to regi- ments." The nominal position of colonels of regiments held by these officers did not make them similar to the regimental officers- meant in our 6ist article of war, nor did they command as lieu- tenant-generals by virtue of brevet rank as we use the term. Scott and Macomb. The bitter controversy between Scott and Gaines was still unsettled when an event occurred, the anticipation of which had probably given special, though secret, interest to each of the participants in the contest. Major-General Jacob Brown, com- manding the army, died on the 24th of February 1828, and thus exposed to view and competition the prize to which the two brigadiers were most eligible. But the acrimony and personality with which they had conducted the struggle for rank between themselves, now produced its natural fruit and furnished reasons which weighed heavily with the President against choosing either of them for promotion, and he appointed Alexander Macomb, then colonel of engineers, the junior of both of them, major- general, February 24th, 1828, wV^ Brown, and assigned him to the command of the army. So far as Scott was concerned this only removed an old griev- ance by substituting a fresh and a greater one. He had long argued that his brevet major-generalcy dating from July 25th, 1814, was in all respects as ample, as valid, and as forcible in the army as if it had been a major-generalcy (not by brevet) under a specific act of Congress authorizing his appointment. In fact he claimed that it was rather the more honorable and valuable of the two. Holding still to this line of argument he now re-inforced it and with concentrated power and full confidence directed it against the President's action. As soon as the news reached him at Cincinnati — April or May 1828 — that the President had nominated Macomb I04 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS for major-general {^lice Brown) he saw that it was for the purpose of making Macomb general-in-chief. He at once filed his protest in a letter to the President dated May 3d, 1828. He claimed that by virtue of his brevet he would remain Macomb's superior officer even a:fter Macomb's appointment to the office of major- general in the army vice B;own, and he announced his intention of disobeying Macomb's orders. He said " that not a case has ever occurred in any modern army, not even under governments the most arbitrary — certainly not in the British or American armies, in which a junior officer had been made to command an actual senior in the same grade, whether senior by brevet or otherwise, except by consent or within the body of a regiment, as provided in the 6ist article of war in relation to brevets ;" and he contended that the President could not lawfully order him, the senior, to obey Macomb as general-in-chief because such com- mand from the President would not onfy be against the common law of the army but against the 62d article of war, which declares that " the officers highest in rank shall command " and, a fortiori " cannot give a lawful command to a superior." In the extended correspondence growing out of this case, Scott enlarged and presented again the arguments in support of brevet rank which he had used in his contest with Gaines. By the middle of May Scott was in Washington, where he received, on the 30th of that month, Macomb's order of the 28th assuming command of the army. He immediately addressed a letter to the secretary of war requesting that Macomb might be ordered before a court-martial for contempt or disrespect towards his (senior and therefore) commanding officer or 2d. That Scott might himself be immediately relieved from duty and put on trial for his recorded refusal to obey his junior, Macomb, the real object, of course, being not to punish an offence but to get a judicial decision from the highest military tribunal. In a letter, dated June 3d. the acting secretary of war, speaking for the Pres- ident, informed General Scott that the law authorized only one major-general and two brigadier-generals ; that General Macomb, had been appointed the major-general by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, and that he was therefore the officer highest in rank in the line of the army by commission ; that the order was issued by General Macomb under the authority of his appointment and by express command of the. President, and that General Macomb should not be arrested and put on trial for issuing it, nor should General Scott be relieved from duty and put on trial ; and furthermore the President declined to submit the matter in any form to a court-martial. To this General Scott replied from Philadelphia, in a letter OF BREVETS. lOS dated June 8th,i828, answering thg views of the President and renewing the arguments and precedents in favor of brevet rank. On the 19th June the acting secretary of war responded saying that the President's views were unchanged and that he expected a ready obedience to the order in question. In response to this General Scott wrote from Philadelphia asking a furlough until the ist of April, 1829, in. order that he might seek relief from Congress. He was notihed, June 25th, that the reasons he gave for desiring the furlough, presented in themselves insuperable objections to its being granted, and that the leave upon which he was then absent from his command would be considered as ending on the 25th of July following, and that he was expected to be on duty at his proper station on the 26th of- that month. By the 24th of July, 1828, General Scott was on duty at his. post, Cincinnati, Ohio, but instead of yielding to the President's orders and decisions he, on that day, wrote to the secretary of war saying that on his return he found an order from the " general-in-chief," but that as he knew no general-in-chief other than the senior general of the army, and, he being that senior, he denied the legality of the order and stated that he only omitted asking for Macomb's arrest for ^'^ presumption " because he had previously made a like request without effect. He then called attention to his repeated refusal to obey Macomb's orders and again presented an elaborate argument and urged that the question be sent before a court-martial. His request was again denied in a letter from the secretary of war dated August 4, 1828, and the President's commands for him to obey General Macomb's orders were repeated. On the 2ist of August, 1828, General Scott wrote to the secretary of war reviving the subject, and calling attention to his repeated refusal to obey Macomb's orders. In this letter he says : "I do not claim the command of the army (under the President) as positive right. The acts of Congress in force do not create the office of 'Commander-in-Chief,' 'General-in-Chief,' or ' Commander of the Army.' The first and third offices existed in the revolutionary war and in 1788-89 respectively; and were both filled by the same individual — the father of his country. The existing laws do not even-require that the senior general should be called to Washington to aft as Commander of the Army, etc., under the President. So before 1808, when we had but one general officer (Brigadier Wilkinson) he was not, but for a short period, charged with the immediate command of the army, but generally commanded a particular department, or district, whilst other departments or districts were placed under colonels. In 1808 two other brigadiers (Hampton and Gansevoort) were added to the establishment and each of the three charged with separate geo - 6 I06 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS graphical commands. The same arrangement prevailed through- out the late war, and again, on the peace establishment down to 182 1. During all these periods the President held the immediate command of the army (through the war department) in his own hands. In 182 1 for the first time since the death of General Washington, the senior general (Brown) was charged with the command of the entire army, and called to Washington. " It is, therefore, perfectly competent to the President to resume the irrimediate command of the army, through the war department, or otherwise, and to assign the several general officers of the line to separate geographical commands. All that I contend for, then, is this : if either of these generals be charged with the entire command of the army, under the President, it must te the senior general on duty, which senior I am ; for the President cannot require an actual senior to obey a junior." On the 14th of October, 1828, General Scott sent the secretary of war an abridgement of the foregoing correspondence, and receiving no reply to his letter of August 21st, he, on November ist, wrote, asking again for leave of absence until April, 1829. Before a reply to this reached him, he received orders from Gen- eral Macomb to move some companies of his command, in regard to which he, on November loth, 1828, wrote the secretary of war as follows : — " For reasons which have been so frequently stated by me to the war department I can only know General Macomb as my junior and inferior officer, and shall therefore wholly disregard this and all other pretended orders and instructions from him." Scott held that a brevet signified " that the holder would be called to fill the first corresponding vacancy, that might occur and of course according to the seniority of the brevet in its grade," and that Macomb was not the major-general, nor by commission commander of the army, but only at best the one major-general under the act of March 2, 1821, and that he (Scott) was the senior, and therefore the superior in same grade. In support of this view that Macomb was not made commander of the army, he cited the act of June, 1775, by which Washington was made gen- eral and commander-in-chief ; the act of May 28, 1778, granting authority to appoint a " commander of the army, who being com- missioned as lieutenant-general may be authorized to command the armies of the U.S. ;" and the act of March 3, 1779, saying that " a commander of the army of the U.S. shall be appointed and commissioned by the style of general of the armies of the- U.S., and the present office of lieutenant-general shall thereafter be abolished," and from these designations of a commander he rea- soned that Macomb, not being so designated, was not commander. OF BREVETS. 10/ In response to Scott, under date of November 15, 1828, the secretary of war, P. B. Porter, said : — ■ " The respect which the President cannot cease to entertain for your former service, has induced him to extend to the spirit of in- subordination manifested in your late correspondence with this department, a degree of forbearance wliich he has found it difficult to reconcile with the stern principles of military obedience. Be- ing convinced, however, by the earnestness and confidence with which you attempt to maintain them, that you have wrought your- self into a full and honest belief of the soundness of the extraor- dinary pretensions which you advance on the subject of brevet rank ; and being desirous that you should fully understand the ground upon which you stand, and the consequences to which a per- severance in your present contumacious course will speedily and inevitably lead, he has instructed me to explain to you, briefly, his general views on the powers and properties of brevet rank ; and the reasons which determine him not to submit the questions which you have thought proper to raise, either to the decision of a court martial, or to the opinions of a board of officers. You advance the broad proposition that a brevet is, of itself, a commission, conveying equal authority and dignity with a com- mission of appointment, and that it gives to the officer holding it, the same rights of rank and command; and that the 6ist article of the rules and articles of war, so far from having been intend- ed to confer any new and original rank or authority on a brevet officer, was designed to limit and restrict the powers which apper- tain to, and are inherent in, the office, — ^by pointing out particular cases in which, and which only, brevet rank should not avail him. The President, on the other hand, is of opinion that a brevet is, in itself, amere honorary distinction, conferred as a reward for gal- lant, meritorious, or long continued service. That it invests the per- son on whom it is bestowed, with no independent and substantive office. That it conveys no right of command except in the acciden- tal and heterogeneous combinations of troops, described in the 6ist article above referred to. That this, and the next succeeding article, No. 62, contain, substantially, the whole and only law by which a brevet officer, as such, can ever be entitled to command : And further, that the latter clause of the 6ist article, instead of being as you contend, a restriction on the general and prescriptive powers, supposed by you to be inherent in a brevet office, is mere- ly a protracted or negative description, or qualification of the lim- ited authority expressly conferred by the preceding clause of the article. The first law, under our present government, which allows, brevets to be granted at all, was passed in 18 12, and authorizes the President to -confer brevet rank on such officers of the army I08 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS ' as shall distinguish themselves by gallant actions, or meritorious conduct, or who shall have served ten years in one grade.' That the brevet of a major-general conferred by this law (and yours was so conferred) was not intended to invest the person to whom it should be given with a distinct and substantive office, clothed with all the powers which the laws have assigned to that station, is at once apparent on referring to the second section of the second article of the constitution of the United States, which requires that ' the President shall nominate, and by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, appoint ambassadors, other public ministers, and consuls, judges of the supreme court, and all other officers whose appointments are not therein otherwise provided for.' But it authorizes ' Congress to vest, by law, the appointment of such inferior officers, as they may think proper, in the President alone.' The office of a major-general in the army of the United States, is, in regard both to the powers it involves, and the distinction it confers, one of the highest known to our laws ; and in both these respects, is much more elevated than that of a ' consul,' who is enumerated in the constitution as not among the inferior class. The Congress of 1812, therefore, in authorizing the President alone to confer this distinction, could not have considered it in the light of an office ; or if they did, they must have deemed it of so little consequence, on account of the mere occasional and fugitive commands which it authorizes, as to fall within the class of ' inferior officers.' If, on the other hand, they intended to authorize the appointment of an officer with powers such as you contend appertain to a brevet major-general, the law itself, as well as the appointment you received under it, is unconstitutional and void, arid you can claim nothing under either." " The marked difference of phraseology between that part of the law of July 6th, 1812, which authorizes the appointment of certain officers by commission, and that part of the same law, which allows brevets to be given, clearly shows the different lights in which these two species of rank were then considered. By the first section of that act, the President is authorized ' by and with the consent of the Senate to appoint two brigadier-generals,' etc., while the fourth section' ' authorizes the Fresident (2lon&) to confer brevet rank on such officers of the army as shall distinguish themselves,' etc." " In your comments on the letter addressed to you from this department on the 3d of June last, you object to the assertion in that letter that the law ' to reduce the military peace establish- ment of the United States' authorizes only one major-general, and two brigadier-generals, and to the use of the article ' the,' as ap- OF BREVETS. lOQ plied to Major-General Macomb ; and attempt to show by quota- tions from various statutes, * that the laws now in force, do recognize several major-generalSj still more brigadiers, and a host of colonels. " It is true that our laws acknowledge, besides those enumer- ated in the act of 182 1, numerous officers who hold honoraiy rank in consequence of brevets, or commissions of a prior date to those by which they are now mustered ; and these honorary distinctions will entitle them to temporary and occasional command under the 6 1 St article of war. But our military establishment as fixed by the law of 1821, acknowledges no more offices of any particular grade than are therein enumerated, although there may be more officers who claim such honorary distinction. The ■ functions^ for instance, appertaining to the office of major-general in bur present army, are by law, assigned to one person only, and those of brig- adier to two; and these three, strictly speaking, are the only offices of those grades known to the law of 1821. The former is at present fiUed'by General Macomb, and the two latter by General Gaines and yourself, in virtue of regular commissions which have been issued to you respectively. " If any other person than the one assigned to it by this legal organization should be called to perform the duties of either of these offices, he would discharge its functions for the time being, not because he holds the office, but because, holding another office whicB? renders him eligible to this command, the president has temporarily assigned him to it. " To show that your views in regard to the organization and command of the army, under the present establishment, have un- dergone a most important change, and that they were, not many years since, in exact accordance with those expressed in the letter from this department of the 3d of June last, I take the liberty to make a quotation from a letter addressed by you to the secretary of war under date of the 14th of December, 1821. In that letter you say: '"The theory of its (the army's) present organization is simply this : one major-general to command the whole line, under the president, or what is the same thing, in this case, the war depart- ment;— two brigadiers, etc., etc. Since the 17th October last, //S,? major-general' {not Major-General Brown) 'has been confined by mdisposition, at a distance from general headquarters equal to twelve or thirteen days by post. He is, in fact, at this moment to be presumed as much disqualified for the actual command of the army, as he is avowedly disabled from returning to his hab- itual station. On whom, then, does the vacant command devolve, ad interim 1 ' no HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS "I beg, now, to ask, whether the above extract does not most distinctly recognize one, and only one, major-general ; and twD, and only two, brigadiers, as authorized by the present organization of the army ; and whether it does not, also, distinctly recognize (what you have recently thought proper to question) the right of ^the major-general' to command the whole line of the army, including, of course, the two brigadiers ? " The great and fundamental error into which you and other brevet officers, who have addressed the government in support of the pretensions of this species of rank, have fallen, is to be found in the obvious misinterpretation which you have given to the term 'brevet,' as used in the 6ist article of the rules and articles of war and the phrase ' of the line of the army,' as used in the 62d article, to which two articles, forming together the whole brevet code as regards rank and command, I beg leave to call your particular attention. " It is assumed as the base of the argument, that brevet rank is rank in the line of the army, and that the words ' or commissions of a prior date to those of the regiment in which they serve,' as used in the 6ist article, were intended as a definition of the word ' brevet ' which immediately precedes them ; and therefore, that a brevet means a commission of prior date to those of the regiment in which the person holding it serves : whereas it is, I think, obvious that the word brevet, and tlie words following it, quoted above, are intended to indicate two distinct and totally different subjects. " As relates to rank, the wordj ' brevet,' if my examinations have been faithful, is never coupled with the word ' commission ' either in the rules or articles of war, or in any other law of congress passed anterior to the year 1818 ; but on the contrary, they are used in contrast with each other, and as denoting two distinct subjects. The word ' commission ' being evidently in- tended to denote an authority to fill some office specially recog- nized by law to exist, and vacant at the time of the appointment ; and brevet the mere creation of a military rank at large without reference to any place or vacancy to which it is applicable. " Rank in the line of the army, or lineal rank, as understood by the President, is applicable to the existing organization of that portion only of the army which is intended for field operations, or the exertion of physical force against an enemy. It is com- monly used in contradistinction to rank i?i the staff; the business of staff officers being, not to fight in the field, but to supply and superintend what are usually called the muniments of war, such as arms, clothing, subsistence, and whatever regards its health. But the phrase ' lineal rank ' is also used to indicate the rank OF BREVETS. HI which an officer holds in the particular corps in which he is, by law, arranged, aad doing duty, in exclusion of rank which he holds, or may have held, in another corps, although in relation to such other corps, it is, or may have been lineal. . " Suppose, as has already happened in our service, that m consequence of the reduction and reorganization of the army, a colonel of a regiment un-der the old establishment, should be mustered and do duty as a lieutenant-colonel under the new ; his lineal rank in the new regiment would be only that of a lieu- tenant-colonel ; and his old rank of colonel, although lineal at the time it was conferred in relation to the corps in which he then served, becomes extra lineal, or as a lawyer would term it, col- lateral, in regard to the corps in which he is now arranged ; and it is in this sense, and with a view to this distinction, that the words 'of the line of the army' are used in the 62d article. " If you are correct in supposing that brevet rank, is rank ' by commission,' and rank too, ' in the line of the army,' then the 6ist and 62 d articles of the rules and articles of war, if not arrant nonsense, are at least, utterly inoperative and useless, for the effect of them, if any, is to give the command of troops, in all the various situations therein described, to precisely the same officers, and to the identical officers too, who would have been entitled to it, if these articles had never been introduced." " But in the sense in which the President interprets the words 'brevet' and 'of the line of the army' these articles are pecu- liarly appropriate and pregnant with meaning, — and they show by the minuteness of their descriptions, and their obvious anti- thetic arrangement, as contrasted with each other, that they were intended to describe totally different persons. " The laws fixing our military establishment look to a clear and distinct organization which assign to every corps of the army a certain number of officers of a particular grade, and who are regularly appointed and commissioned by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, to such an extent as to complete the legal establishment ; but they also, as has been before observed, recognize certain occasional commands in officers who have only the honorary distinctions of ' brevets or commissions of a prior date,' etc. " In accordance with these principles the 6ist article provides that in ' courts-martial and on detachments when composed of different corps, officers having brevets, or commissions of a prior date to -those of the regiment in which they serve may have com- mand;' and the 6'2d article declares that in certain other situ- ations of the troops (comprehending those not described in article 61) they shall be commanded by ' the officer highest in rank of the 112 HISTORY- AND LEGAL EFFECTS line of the army, marine corps, or militia, by commission there on duty, etc., unless otherwise specially directed by the President of the United States.' " The words ' by commission,' were evidently intended to be put in contrast with, and to exclude ' brevets ' mentioned in the pre- ceding article, and which, as I have before observed, were not, until the year 1818, treated in the light of commissions — and the words ' officer highest in rank, of the line of the army,' it is equally evident, were intended to be placed in contradistinction to officers having ' commissions of a prior date to those of the regiment in which they serve' as described in article 61, and to exclude, not only brevet officers, who are the last persons who can show any claim to ' rank in the line,' but more particularly, those officers ' who held commissions of a prior date,' etc., and who, as regards the regiment or corps in which they are now mustered and serving, are not deemed to be ' officers of the line.' " As long as the integrity of the army or its several parts are preserved, so that each corps acts by itself in conformity with its legal organization, each officer will take command according to the rank or office by which he is mustered into service, but if dif- ferent corps, or parts of different corps, are brought together to act as an integral body or detachment, and all of whom are not under the lineal command of the highest officer of the line pre- sent, then the 6ist article interposes and gives the command of this mixed corps, whose integrity has been thus broken, to an officer 'having a brevet, or commission of a prior date,' etc., if there be one present of a higher grade. Their rank, such as it is, being general, and precisely applicable to this mixed condition of the troops. So, on courts-martial (the other case mentioned in the 6ist article where officers of different corps are combined for the purpose of acting as an entire body), 'brevets or commis- sions of a higher date ' will take effect. " An opinion has been advanced by some, that brevet command is nowhere authorized except in article 61, and, as that article relates to regimental officers only, that general officers can in no case exercise command as such, in virtue of brevet rank : while others, admitting the above construction of the article to be cor- rect, still contend that inasmuch as there was but one general officer belonging to the army when those rules and articles were adopted, and of course the principles applicable to brevet rank and command could not reach him, it is fair to say that on the appointment of numerous officers of higher grade, the same prin- ciple should, by analogy, be extended to them. " The President's views, however, are different from either of these. He is of the opinion, indeed, that article 61 has reference OF BREVETS. 113 to regimental organization only, and that in virtue of this article, no brevet officer, or officer holding a commission of prior date, etc., can claim higher than regimental command ; but he is also of opinion that the Gzd article extends the principle of brevet command (so far as regards the right of selection to the chief command) to officers of every grade, and to military bodies of every size and description associated and doing duty together as described in said article. This article declares, that 'if upon marches, guards, or in quarters, different corps of the army' (thus embracing not only regiments, but brigades, divisions, marines and militia, and supposing too, of necessity in such combinations, the presence of general officers) 'shall happen to join and do duty together, the officer highest in rank of the line of the army, marine corps, or militia, by commission, there on duty, shall command the whole and give orders for what is needful for the service, unless otherwise specially directed by the President of the United States, according to the nature of' the case,' thus giving the. President a discretionary power in all cases to assign a brevet officer to any principal command in the army, although- by doing so he displaces an officer of equal grade ' of . the line of the army by commission.' " The construction which the President puts upon both of these articles when taken in connection, is, that they give to brevet officers a right to regimental rank and command, as matter of course if they think proper to exercise it in detachments and on courts-martial ; but as regards general officers and regimental officers when not on detachment or in courts-martial, brevet rank confers on the. officer holding it, only (to use the significant ex- pression of General Washington), ' eligibility to command,' and that the last clause of the 62d article places the right of elec- tion in the President. The words 'unless otherwise specially directed by the President' as here used, clearly implying a right in him to change the order of command pointed out in that article, and if so, the obvious mode of exercising it is by the substitution of brevet, and other officers mentioned in the preced- ing article, as susceptible of occasional commands. "But assuming that the principles established by the 6ist article are applicable to general as well as regimental officers, there is no possible combination or disposition of the troops of the U. S. which upon these principles, would give you a right to command over General Macomb ; for it is impossible to bring to- gether a detachment, or any mixed corps from the army, over every part of which he has not a lineal command. "The opinion therefore of the President, that General Macomb is your senior officer and has a right to command you, rests, as 6* 114 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS you will perceive, on the facts that he is, in the language of the 62d article of the rules and articles of war, 'the ofiScer high- est in rank, of the line of the army, by commission,' and that he has equally the right to command the whole, and every part of the army, whether that army be considered as one entire corps, or as composed ' of different corps, happening to join and do duty together,' unless the President should think proper specially to assign you or some other officer to such command. " In the various communications which you have addressed to this department, in support of your supposed rights, derived from your brevet, you have had frequent reference to the practice of other armies — particularly of the British army — to precedents which you consider applicable to the case in our own service ; and to acts of the government of the United States, particularly to an intended decision of the late president in your favor, which you consider as conclusive. " The President considers the practice of other armies, as au- thority to be alleged in our own, only in cases for which the law has not provided, and which are compatible with our own institu- tions. In the British army the brevet is a form of promotion to office. General officers have no other commission than a brevet, and it can therefore never give rise to a collision of rank between them. We have nothing analagous to this in our institutions, and therefore this practice is not applied to us. The only //-/««- pie applicable even to this meaning of the term brevet, in the British army, in common with ours, is, that the brevet shall never permanently displace the rank and command of any other officer. " All the instances which you cited from our own service, of brevet commands, exercised by officers in the army of the United States, are cases of special assignment by direction of the Presi- dent, under the authority given him by the 62d article of war. This observation is specially applied to the case of General Gaines, and your commands over Generals Warrall and Bloomfield in 1814, the facts of which the President has fully ascertained. " With regard to the intimation given you in September, 1822, that the president had determined, in the event of the continued disability of General Brown, to call you to the command of the army, it is to be observed, that you had claimed this command upon the authority of the 2d and 3d paragraphs of the third article of the then existing army regulations, sanctioned by an act of Congress : that these paragraphs have since been expunged from the army regulations, as conflicting with positive legislation. The President presumes that Mr. Monroe's intention was founded entirely upon the regulations in those two paragraphs. He OF BREVETS. I 1 5 regrets to observe that, in your controversy with General Gaines in July, 1824, and in your letter to the secretary of war, of i8th of February, 1827, the demand contained in your letter to the secretary of war, of November 12th, 182 1, and the authority upon which you supported it, entirely escaped your recollection. " Finally, upon a full view and examination of the subject, to which the President has devoted a long and laborious investiga- tion, he is satisfied that your claim to command Major-General Macomb by virtue of your brevet, or even of exemption from obedience to his commands as the major-general of the army by commission, is in positive conflict with the 6ist and 62d articles of war ; with the act of Congress of the 6th of July, 18 12 ; with the act of the 2d of March, 182 1, to reduce and fix the military peace establishment ; with the existing army regulations ; with the authority of General Washington, in his letters to Generals Wayne and Irvine ; with the practice in our own service ; with the executive acts and opinions, excepting while the two disputed paragraphs of the army regulations were in force ; and even with the principles of the practice of the British army : and in these opinions, I deem it in candor due to }'0u to say the members of the administration, whom he has more than once consulted on the subject, unanimously concur. "The reasons which have influenced the President in refusing to submit the question, whether you or General Macomb is the senior officer in rank, to the decision of a court-martial, or to the opinions of a board of officers, are : that the right ultimately to decide under the law on the relative rank of all the officers of the army, is vested in him exclusively. " The President is the executive head ol the civil department of our government, as well as of the militay, which by the spirit of our institutions, is always considered as subordinate to the former ; and it is probably in his civil, rather than his military capacity, that he is authorized to interpret the laws in relation to the army, and see them faithfully executed. " That the only law or regulation authorizing officers of the army, or the President (other than is to be found in the gen- eral delegation of powers to the latter by the constitution), to pass upon the question of relative rank, is the army regulation No. 17, which allows questions of rank, in doubtful cases, to be adjusted 'for the time' by courts-martial, before which they may arise, or by a board of three officers, called by an officer having power to order a general court-martial, but subject, in both cases, ' to the final decision of the war department ; ' thus expressly recognizing the right of the President to make such decision. These refer- ences, too, to courts and boards of officers, are only to be made in Il6 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS doultful cases ; and, even then, the spirit as well as the phrase- ology of the regulation, seems to render such reference wholly optiofial : for, surely, the officer who orders the court or board of officers, and more especially he who has the ultimate power of decision, is the proper person to say whether a case is doubtful, and ought to be referred. " That, in a case like the one now presented, in regard to which the President does not entertain the least doubt, it would, to say the least of it, be highly useless, as well as disrespectful to the officers of the army, to precede his decision, by eliciting in this way opinions which, whatever they might be, could not change that decision. " That, a reference in the present case, to a court, or board of officers, would be inexpedient, inasmuch as it would be impossible to constitute a disinterested tribunal from the materials of the present army. On looking to the higher grades of the army for a president of the tribunal, he would find, first. General Macomb, who is directly interested in the issue of the inquiry ; secondly. General Gaines, who, besides being interested in a similar ques- tion of rank, would be still more objectionable on account of the personal hostility known to exist between you and him ; and indeed it would be found that almost every brevet officer would be interested in swelling the importance of that species of rank, and thereby, his own positive rank in the army ; and those hold- ing rank by commission only, would, on the other hand, be in- clined to increase its relative importance by detracting from that of the other. " That although the President is not disposed to call in ques- tion the legal or constitutional right by which his predecessor deemed himself authorized to organize a board of nine officers in 1815, to enquire into, and express an opinion in the case of, con- tested rank between yourself and General Gaines ; yet, allowing the right to exist, he would deem the exercise of it on this occa- sion extremely unadvised. For the abortive issue of the proceed- ing in 1825, to which I have alluded, assures him that a result equally useless would attend a similar proceeding now ; as the same question in substance, would be presented, and the board, if not composed of the same officers, would be filled with others equally interested, and with opinions equally committed. And he is, moreover, admonished by the excitement which this contro- versy on the subject of brevet rank has already produced, not to renew or increase it, by causing the question to be again formally and judicially agitated by the officers of the army. " The President hopes that a dispassionate examination of the reasons for his decision will reconcile to your judgment and OF BREVETS. 117 feelings, a prompt and cheerful obedience to all the orders which that decision has rendered obligatory; and that your services, which have heretofore been useful and meritorious, may not be lost to the country. " You will perceive, from the tenor of this letter, that the re- quest for a furlough, which you have renewed in yours of the first instant, cannot be granted.'" To this General Scott, in a letter from Cincinnati, dated No- vember 30, 1828, made an elaborate reply. He apologized for the number and length of his communications, said he had writ- ten on the spur of the occasion and had not had leisure to be concise. "The side of authority," said he, "is always brief." He denied the soundness of the President's views, abandoned all hope of changing them, and added, " my present hasty, disjointed and dispirited efforts will therefore be rather thrown out for my brother officers and more particularly those veterans of the war, now few in number, who, like me, had the misfortune to win rank in the field, and who, surviving me in office may, I hope, profit by my sacrifice." The argument in support of brevet rank was then further extend- ed, but before the letter reached its destination, in fact before General Scott dispatched it, he received a letter from the secre- tary, dated November 26, 1828, saying, "it is not the purpose of the President to take any final action in relation to your late very reprehensible conduct, until a sufficient time shall have elapsed for the receipt of your deliberate answer to the letter addressed to you from this department on the isth instant. The nature of that action will, as you perceive, depend in a great measure on the character of the answer received from you, and which the President hopes may not be wholly uninfluenced by the consider- ations which by his direction have been thus presented to you. " To put a stop in the mean time to the course of insubordina- tion in which you have deemed fit to indulge, the President di- rects that from the receipt of this letter, you will consider your- self as suspended from the command of the Western Department of the Army until his further pleasure shall be made known to you.' General Scott transferred his command to General Atkinson, repaired to Washington and memorialized both houses of Con- gress on the subject in which be had been so long and so deeply interested. As shown by the following reports the military committees failed to adopt liis views : — Twentieth Congress.] No. 394. {Second Session. " On the relative force or effect of lineal and brevet rank, as Il8 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS presented in the memorial of Brevet Major-General Winfield Scott. " Communicated to the Senate, January 7th, 1829. Mr. Ben- ton, from the committee on military afifairs, to whom was refer- red the memorial of Major-General Scott, reported : " The memorialist sets forth that he received the brevet rank of major general in the army of the United States on the 25th of July, 18 1 4, and has retained the same ever since— that General Macomb was appointed a major-geaeral in the line of the army on the 24th of May, 1828 : and immediately thereafter by an order of the President of the United States, placed in command of the army, and all officers and soldiers required to obey him. This order, as it affected himself, the memorialist sets forth that he considered to be illegal and refused to obey it, upon the be- lief that his own rank was superior to that of Major-General Ma- comb, and, of course, that he was not subject to be commanded by him ; and therefore prays that a declaratory statute may be passed determining the rights and duties of brevet rank. " The committee, after duly considering the facts set forth by the memorialist and the questions growing out of them, are of opinion that there is no illegality in the order of the President placing Major-General Macomb in command of the army and re- quiring all officers and soldiers to obey him, and that there is no case set forth in the memorial which requires the rights and du- ties of brevet rank to be determined by a declaratory act. They therefore recommend that the prayer of the memorialist be not granted." Twentieth Congress.] No. 396. [Second Session. " On the memorial of Brevet Major-General Winfield Scott, and the distinction between lineal and brevet rank in the army. " Communicated to the House of Representatives, January 27, 1829. Mr. Drayton from the committee on military affairs, to •whom was referred the memorial of Major-General Winfield Scott, reported : " That the memorialist states that he was appointed a brigadier- general on March 9, 1814, and a major-general by brevet on July 25 of the same year, for services set forth in the body of his com- mission ; that General Brown, by virtue of his seniority in the highest grade in our service, that of a major-general, commanded the army from June, 182 1, to the time of his decease, in February, 1828 ; that after General Brown's death. General Macomb being appointed to fill his vacancy, with the rank of major general, from May 24, 1828, the President placed him in command over the army, requiring all officers, &c., to obey his orders, without any OF BREVETS. I I-Q exception as to the memorialist, who was an older major-general, and therefore, according to law and military usage, could not be subjected to the command of his inferior in rank ; that he pre- tested against this order, believing it to be equally repugnant to his rights and to his honor, and prayed to be sent before a court- martial, on the charge of disobeying the orders of General Ma- comb, that his case might be judicially settled ; that he also suggested an arrangement by which he would be exempt from the command of his inferior officer ; that his application and sugges- tion have been rejected ; and that finally he has been suspended from all command in the army. Under these circumstances, the memorialist prays that Congress, by a declaratory statute, would fix and determine the rights and duties appertaining to brevet rank. " Your committee believe that everything relating to brevet rank in the United States is to be found in the 6ist and 62d of the rules and articles of war, and in two acts of Congress of July 6, 1812, and April 16, 1818. In the 6ist article it is enacted 'that officers having brevets or commissions of a prior date to those of the regiment in which they serve may take place in courts-mar- tial and on detachments, when composed of different corps, ac- cording to the rank given in their brevets or dates of their former commissions ; but in the regiment, troop or company to which such officers belong, they shall do duty, and take, both in courts- martial and on detachments, which shall be composed only of their own corps, according to the commissions by which they are mustered in the said corps.' The act of July 6, 1812, authorizes the President to confer brevet rank upon officers of the army who ' shall distinguish themselves by gallant actions, &c., or who shall have served ten years in any one grade : Provided, That such officers shall not receive additional pay or emoluments, except when commanding separate posts, districts, &c., &c.' The act of April i6, 1818, declares that brevet officers shall receive the pay, &c., of their brevet rank only when their command corresponds with that rank ; and that, thereafter, no brevet commission shall be conferred but by and with the advice and consent of the Sen- ate. In the opinion of your committee, the word ' corps ' (which has various senses, both in its military and ordinary acceptation) IS intended, in the 6ist article of war, to mean a regiment or reg- iments. The article refers to ' officers having brevets or commis- sions of a prior date to those of the regiment ' in which they serve; and in enumeratingwhat may be comprehended in 'corps ' the expressions are ' regiment, troop, or company.' This inter- pretation of the word is corroborated by a decision of the Presi- dent of the United States on the ist of July, 1816, in the follow- I20 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS ing words : ' The terms regiment, and corps, as used in the 6ist article of war will be considered as synonymous.'" (General Regulations of the Arjny, No. i8.) " In the 62d article of war it is said : If, upon marches, guards, or in quarters, different corps of the army shall happen to join or do duty together, the officer highest in rank of the line of the army, marine corps or militia, by commission there, on duty or in quar- ters, shall command the whole, and give orders for what is need- ful to the service, ' unless otherwise specially directed by the President of the United States, according to the nature of the case.' Upon reading these two articles, immediately connected with each other, the inference is irresistible that Congress pur- posed to comprise in them all the positions in which officers, of whatever rank, might be placed; in the 6ist article, on courts martial and in detachments composed of regiments or parts of regiments ; and, in the 62d article, in all other military bodies, however large and however situated. " To ascertain what officer, by the 62d article, is entitled to the command, it is only necessary that the meaning of the technical term ' rank in the line of the army ' should be clearly understood. ' Rank in the line of the army ' is conceived to be rank in a mili- tary body specially organized for the exertion of physical force, or, in other words, for combating an enemy, and an officer in such a body has a direct and permanent command over the troops which compose it. The expressions ' rank in the line,' ' lineal rank,' are generally used in contradistinction to staff appoint- ments, and to rank which confers upon officers only an occasional right to command, including brevet officers and officers having commissions of a prior date to their lineal commissions. It can- not be predicated of staff officers, brevet officers, or officers with prior commissions, that they have a direct ■ajci^ permanent command over a division, brigade, regiment, &c. Staff officers have no direct command over the troops ; they are the organs through which commands or instructions are communicated, or by which various duties necessary for the operations of an army are performed, such as providing subsistence, clothing, arms, &c. They are some- times taken from the line and sometimes not. ' It is at all times competent for the commander, when he shall judge that the good of the service requires it, to put an individual . of the staff tempo- rarily on lineal duties, that is when the individual holds rank in the line. ^ (General Regulations of the Army, No. 125.) " Officers of the staff having lineal rank, or rank assimilated thereto, and officers of the line without troops, may be assigned to temporary or separate command, correspondent to rank, by the general-in-chief." (lb. No. 444.) OF BREVETS. 121 " A brevet officer, as a brevet officer, has no direct ox permanent command over troops ; he may'have z. direct temporary commancl over them in a mixed, detached body, as described in the 6ist article ; but as soon as the parts of which the detachment is com- posed join the regiments to which they belong, the command of brevet officers ceases. A brevet officer, also, has direct command over troops so long as he is in the situation specified in Ihe acts of Congress which have been cited. When not in these situations, he has no other command than that which is attached to his lineal rank. An officer in the line having a prior commission, which he may have held, can have no command corresponding with that prior commission excepting temporarily. The meaning of 'rank in the line of the army' the committee trusts, has been sufficiently explained and illustrated. The only officers in the line of the army, according to its existing organization, are one major-general, two brigadier-generals, and a fixed number of colonels, lieutenant- colonels, majors, captains, and subalterns. There are, neverthe- less, two major-generals, and several brigadiers, colonels, lieu- tenant-colonels, majors, &c., &c., by brevet, who are not of the line, for the reasons already stated, and who could not be so, in- asmuch as the act of 2d March, 182 1, authorizes no greater num- ber of officers than as above enumerated, whereas the number of brevet officers is frequently changing. "Where a detachment amounts to a regiment, composed of companies from different regiments, the highest officer of the line present would be a captain ; when composed of battalions, the highest officer of the same description would be a major ; where the detachment amounts to a brigade, consisting of two regiments, the highest lineal officer would be a colonel. In all these in- stances, supposing the grades of the officers to be no more than adequate to their commands, there would be no officer on duty whose lineal rank would give him the command of the regiment m the one case or of the brigade in the' other. Under these cir- cumstances, therefore, the object of the 6ist article is to give the command of the detachment to the oldest officer present, whether of the line or otherwise. But in every situation in which the troops of the United States, as they are now organized, could be placed, the command of a major-general of the line of the army would extend over the whole. " Where a detachment is composed of brigades, the 6ist,article does not apply ; the 62d article then prescribes the rule, and its language is, that ' if, upon marches, guards, &c., different corps ot the army (which comprehends brigades, divisions, corps d armies, &c.), shall happen to join, &c., the officer highest in rank of the line of the army, marine corps or militia, by commission, 122 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS there on dut}', &c., shall command the whole, unless otherwise specially directed by the President. A brevet officer not being of the line of the army, the command, by this article, could not devolve upon him, and could not be assumed by him, unless by the special appointment of the President. The inference drawn by the com- mittee from the language of the 62d article is not at all affected by the acts of 1812 and 1818, which merely provide that brevet officers shall receive the pay and emoluments of their brevet rank when on duty, and having a command according to their brevet rank, and ' at no other time.' " Should the committee have erred in its construction of the 62d article of war, and should it be considered that, under it, brevet officers, in common with officers of the line, may exercise the commands which are therein mentioned, it would not therefore follow that the oldest major-general, whether by brevet or other- wise, must command the army. That article vests the power of selecting the commanding officer in the President. If a right of the command necessarily devolves upon the officer highest in rank, the power of selection, which the law has expressly given to the President, would be unmeaning and inoperative. " Taking a general view of brevet rank, the committee neither regards it as merely honorary, or as equal to and identical with lineal rank. It is not merely honorary ; for where the contin- gencies occur which are adverted to in the 6ist article, a brevet officer has, of right, the commands which are there given to him ; he is also, of right, entitled to the pay and emoluments which are allowed to him by the acts of 1812 and 1818 ; and under the 62d article he is as eligible to the highest command in the army as a lineal officer. Brevet rank is not equal to or identical with lineal rank, because the existence of it is not necessary to the formation of any corps ; for when a brevet officer dies or resigns, or is pro- moted, only the vacancy left by his lineal rank is supplied ; and because an officer of higher rank by his brevet than a lineal officer in the regular and permanent organization of the army would be commanded by the latter if superior to him in lineal rank. So long as the corps of the army are not broken into de- tachments, so long as they preserve their entire formation, a bre- vet officer, by the rules and articles of war, has no military func- tions to perform ; and under the acts of 1812 and i8i8, except- ing in the situations therein described, he is equally without com- mand by virtue of his brevet commission. " It seems to the committee to be a corollary, deducible from what they have premised, that, without any interference of the Executive, the regular army of the Union would at this time be subject to the command of Major-General Macomb, he being the OF BREVETS. 12^3 officer highest in rank in the line of the army ; and even were this proposition questionable, the committee entertains no doubt of his being entitled to that command, having been specially ap- pointed to it by the President of the United States, under the authority conferred upon him in the 62d of the Rules and Articles of War. " The committee being of opinion that our legislation is clear and explicit upon the subject under its consideration, has there- fore altogether refrained from any inquiries into the military regu- lations or usages of other nations. " For the reasons submitted by it, the committee recommends the adoption of the following resolution : " ' Resolved. — That it is inexpedient; for Congress to pass any law relating to the rights and duties of officers of brevet rank.' " In the meantime a new administration had come in. Jackson had succeeded Adams as President; and Eaton had replaced Porter as secretary of war. Although all branches of the Government, competent to deal with the subject, had decided against General Scott's claims, the deep interest felt by the new President in the distinguished sol- dier, who had shared with him the perils and glories of the late war, led to an early consideration of his case. One of President Jackson's first acts was to relieve Scott from his suspension from command and grant him, ia April, 1829, a leave of absence for six months with permission to go abroad. Scott left the country with every indication of an intention to return to private life when he came back. It is reported that while in France, he con- ferred with the venerable and honored Lafayette, and received ad- vice in the following terms : — " A sordid man would, in your position, return to duty from the paltry consideration of pounds and pence. A second-rate man, superior to so low a motive, but of limited understanding, would lay down his commission from mere misapprehension of what was fit and proper ; and even a magnanimous man. General, equally free from the imputations of imbecility and meanness, might in the first moment of feeling, determine in favor of the last course but would ultimately be governed by the first. Accustomed to venerate the laws of his country, he would yield up his particular judgment of their scope and effect, to that of those who must be admitted to be their legitimate interpreters. -However pure the teelmgs that prompted him to discharge himself from his official trust, he would soon perceive that the act might admit of great and dangerous misconstruction— that it involved no less a respon- sibility than the extinction of subordination, that vital principle of all armies. 124 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS " If such have been your determinations, consider, I beseech you. General, consider it maturely. Be assured that your great services and your high rank have put it out of your power to fol- low, in this matter, the bent of your inclinations. Who so proper, in fact, to set the example of obedience, that great virtue of the soldier, as he who has purchased fame and station with his blood ? Who so fit, by a contrary course, to become an instrument of evil, as he whose acts take an irresistible degree of moral authority from their past unexceptional tenor." On the 13th of August, 1829, the following general order was published, confirming the views of the President and the commit- tees of Congress which practically settled the controversy concern- ing brevet rank that had so long disturbed the harmony of the service : — Adjutant-General's Office, "Washington, 13th Augi'ft, 1829. " Order No. 54. " The subjoined regulation, approved by the Pres-ident of the United States, has been received from the war department, and is published for the information and government of all concerned : " Regulation concerning Rank and Command. " I. Brevet rank will give no command, except on detachments composed of different corps, and within the meaning of the 6ist article of war. "2. Detachment means a body of troops sent out from the main body to perform a particular service, and to be absent for a limited time ; when such a detachment is composed of different corps brevet rank will take effect in conformity with the 6ist arti- cle of war. " 3. Under the same article of war, brevet rank will take place on courts-martial, when composed of officers of different corps. " 4. In regularly constituted commands, such as garrisons, posts, departments, regiments, corps, companies, battalions, bri- gades, divisions, corps a'armee, or the army itself, Brevet rank is not to be exercised except by special assignment. "5. Officers having rank in the line of the army, the staff, or by brevet, though eligible to command, will not assume the com- mand, unless specially put on duty with that intention. " 6. An officer intrusted with the command of a post, detachment, guard, or separate command, will not surrender it to another, un- less regularly relieved from the duty assigned him, except in case of sickness or inability to perform his duty, when the officer next OF BREVETS. 125 in rank, present and on duty with such command, will succeed as a matter of course. " 7. An officer not on duty with, nor belonging to any of the companies, battalions, regiments or corps composing a command, cannot assume the command. He must first have been put on duty by some competent authority to make him a part of the com- mand, before he can assume or exercise the command. " 8. If different corps happen to join and do duty together, the officer highest in rank by his commission in the line of the army, present on duty, has the right to command the whole and to give the orders needful to the service : brevet officers or officers hav- ing brevets or commissions of a prior date to those of the regi- ment in which they serve, cannot by virtue of such brevets or commissions of a prior date assume the command. " By command of the President. "JOHN H. EATON, " Secretary of War. " By order of Alexander Macomb, commanding the Army : " R. Jones, " Adjt.-General." On his return to the United States, General Scott decided to accept the situation and wrote the following letter : — " New York, November 10, 1829. " Sir,— I have seen the President's order of 13th August last, which gives a construction of the 6ist and 62d articles of war relative to rank and command. "Humbly protesting that this order deprives me of rights guaranteed by these articles and the uniform practice of the army under them from the commencement of the Government down to the year 1828, when the new construction was first adopted agamst me ; in obedience to the universal advice of my friends who deem it incumbent on me to sacrifice my own conviction and feelings to what may, by an apt error, be considered the repeated decision of the civil authority of iny country, I have brought my- self to make that sacrifice, and therefore withdraw the tender of my resignation now on file in your department. " I also beg leave to surrender the remainder of the furlough the department was kind enough to extend to me in April last and to report myself for duty. " Very respectfully, &c., &c., „T, „ ^ „ ^ "WINFIELD SCOTT. To Hon. J. H. Eaton, . " Secretary of War." 126 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS In response to this he received the following letter and order : — "War Department, " Nov. 13, 1829. "Sir, — Your letter of the loth instant is received, and I take pleasure in saying to you that it affords the department much satis- faction to perceive the conclusion to which you have arrived as to your brevet rights. None will do you the injustice to suppose that the opinions declared by you upon this subject are not the result of reflection and conviction ; but since the constituted authorities of the government have, with the best feelings enter- tained, come to a conclusion adverse to your own, no other opinion was cherished, or was hoped for, but that on your return to the United States, you would adopt the course your letter indicates, and with good feeling resume those duties to your country, of which she has so long had the benefit." " Agreeably to your request, the furlough, heretofore granted you, is revoked from and after the 20th instant. You will accord- ingly report to the commanding general, Alexander Macomb, for duty, &c., &c. "J. H. EATON. "To Major General Winfield Scott." " Adjutant-General's Office, "Washington, 20th November, 1829. " Orders, No. 74. " Brevet Major-General Gaines will assume command of the Western Department." " Brevet Major-General Scott will assume command of the Eastern Department." " Brevet_ Major-General Gaines will continue the inspection in which he is now engaged, and when completed will make his report thereof to the general-in-chief for his information. " By order of Alexander Macomb, " Major General, Comdg. the Army. " ROGER JONES, "Adjt.-General." In his annual report, November 30, 1829, the secretary of war, J. H. Eaton, said : " the long controverted question respecting brevet rank in the army has been decided in a n anner which is believed to be in conformity with existing laws on the subject. I am happy to add that as far as opinions have been ascertained, OF BREVETS. 12/ the officers of the army are disposed to acquiesce in the decision, because of the certainty which has been arrived at, and the ip- creased harmony which it is expected will be consequent upon that certainty." Scott and Gaines. As General Scott did not rank Gaines otherwise than by brevet, any more than he did Macomb, the final decision adverse to his brevet claims, in the latter case governed in like manner in the former, and he was arranged as the second brigadier, instead of the first major-general in the service, and the brevet struggle at the head of the army subsided and did not appear again until 1841, when it attained for a brief period a ludicrous prominence. On the 25th June, 1841, Macomb died, and Brigadier-General Winfield Scott was appointed "the Major-General of the army of the United States," {vice Macomb), to date from June 25, 1841, and by the following general orders, was announced and assumed command. "War Department, Adjutant-General's Office, "Washington, July 5th, 1841. " General orders : " Brevet Major-General Winfield Scott having been appointed by the President, by and with the consent and advice of the Sen- ate, the Major-General of the army of the United States, he is directed to assume the command, and enter upon his duties accordingly." " By command of the President of the United States. " R. JONES. " Adjt.-Genl." " Headquarters of the Army, "Washington, July sth, 1841. " General Orders, No. 37. " Conformably to the order of the President of the United States, in the case, Major-General Scott assumes the command of the Army." " His aides-de-camp are First Lieutenant B. R. Alden, 4th In- fantry, and First Lieutenant E. D. Keyes, 3d Artillery." " Until a successor in his late commission be appointed, the reports, returns, and applications, made to the headquarters of the Eastern Division will be addressed to the assistant adjutant 128 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS general at Elizabethtown, N. J., whence they will be forwarded to general headquarters, Washington, for consideration. "WINFIELD SCOTT. " By command of the major-general, " R. Jones, " Adjutant General." He accepted the appointment with the date named, and enter- ed on duty under it, notwithstanding all of his previous allegations and proofs in support of the older and better rank of major- general by brevet, which he now abandoned. But he had no sooner been tempted away from his powerful brevet guns, than they were seized with all their ammunition by his old enemy, and the fiery bolts he had forged for others were poured into his own camp. The position of major-general-in-chief which he now oc- cupied, had, however, been so strongly intrenched by the govern- ment, against his attacks while it was held by another, that he could occupy it in a state of security. The situation was comical but not critical. The facts in more detail are as follows : — Gaines and Scott, both brigadier-generals and brevet major-generals, held, under considerate arrangements of government, the command, and con- sequently drew the pay and emoluments of major-generals, nearly all of the twenty-seven years from 1815 to 1842. Scott had become general-in-chief in 1841, and in 1842, a general order — No. 40 — was issued from his headquarters, discontinuing the two military geographical divisions in which the country was divided, and substituting nine separate and distinct military departments. Gaines, who had commanded, one of the divisions, now fell to one of the departments, which not only limited his authority, but he thought would reduce his pay and emoluments to those of brigadier-general. This order, although promulgated by General Scott, bore upon its face the fact that it was made by the President ; but it followed closely upon the heels of General Scott's advancement to the chief command in the army, and, ever mindful of the bitter hostility which existed between these two generals, Gaines' friends evidently considered the order as prompted by Scott, and through malice. They therefore seized upon it as the pretext for attacking General Scott with his own weapons. The inconsistency of Scott's different positions was how one of the telling charges against him. Gaines escaped the direct effect of a like charge against himself, to which he was equally exposed, by not appearing personally in the dexterous manoeuvre. His grievance was presented by his friends. William Wallace Whitney, in March, 1844, presented to Congress a memo- OF BREVETS. 1 29 rial praying that a bill be passed dividing the United States into two military districts, and requiring that one of the brigadier-generals in the line of the army be assigned to the command of each. He alleged in his memorial that the general order in question (No. 40 of 1842) presented the " anomalous and insubordinate proceeding of a junior officer issuing to his senior an order for obedience, while that junior was shielded from responsibility to the army and country." He then presented in detail the points of the old question of rank between Generals Scott and Gaines, and adapted to the present case, in his own way, the arguments General Scott had used to prove that Macomb, as general-in-chief, could not give him (Scott) orders. But he reached in the argument a more remote point than Scott himself had ever attained. He said that Scott " in July, 1841, was promoted from the lineal rank of briga- dier-general to that of major-general, whereby he became shorn of his commission as brigadier, and consequently that of brevet- major-general : for the moment the lineal commission on which the brevet commission is based is taken away, that moment the brevet commission is taken away \ " — that is to say, by going upward he had gone downward. Scott, therefore, according to this memorialist, was nothing else than a major-general, ranking as such from 1841. But Gaines was still a major-general by brevet from 1814, and " what," asks the memorialist, " are the rights which flow to Edmund P. Gaines from his brevet commission of major-general } " and he answers, " a// the rights which appertain to a major-general's com- mand, which is 2l division" and he went on to explain that having his proper command, a division, Gaines ranked Scott, and that it was in his endeavor to defeat this that Scott had Order No. 40 published, abolishing divisions. Congress was also in this connection memorialized in the in- terest of General Gaines by a number of citizens in Western New York where he fought during the war, and by a public meeting held at Memphis, Tennesee. General Scott was permitted to sub- mit his remarks on the subject, but he confined himself mainly to explanations of the order, and its bearing, and to matters personal to General Gaines. He was not lured into under- taking to answer the powerful arguments in support of brevet rank which he had formerly used in his own behalf, but which were now turned against him. In fact he had, in conformity with the rulings of the government, merely accepted the situ- ation, probably without having changed his opinions on the subject. He held what he desired and deserved— the com- mand of the army — but probably not by the tenure that he preferred. Congress declined, as it had done before, to legis- 7 130 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS late upon the subject. The matter went so far, however, that the military committee of the House called upon the secretary of war for his views on the subject of "abolishing the office of commanding general-in-chief." To this the secretary, Mr. Spencer, replied : " In answering it I beg to submit the views of a former secretary of war, General P. B. Porter, from which the following extract is made : — " ' My opinion, therefore, is, that there should be at the head of the army of the United States — ^whether its numbers continue as at present, or whether they be enlarged or diminished — an individual higher in rank than any other officer, and who should have' the immediate command of the whole ; that he should be stationed, in times of peace at least, at the seat of government, where he can most readily receive the advice and orders of the President, and where he can hold the most direct and expeditious communication with every part of his command.' " The present organization being in conformity with the preced- ing views, it will readily be perceived that my opinion is against the expediency of abolishing the office of major-general. " If it be said that the office of major-general being abolished, the army will then have a head in the President, or the secretary of war, by whom his military functions are discharged, the answer is that the department of war does not form an integral part of the military machine. The numerous civil avocations of the secretary of war would put it wholly out of his power to attend to the daily orders and routine of duties which appertain to the command and discipline of an army ; and the effect of a simi- lar abolition of the office of major-general, would, in the present state of the army, be to divide it into two separate, independent, and probably conflicting commands, under the two brigadiers ; unless they should be connected thrpugh the instrumentality of the adjutant-general, or some other subordinate officer stationed at the seat of government under the secretary of war, and who would in fact perform the appropriate duty of the chief of the army." " These views," said Mr. Spencer, " are adopted, and fully and entirely concurred in by me. Their soundness and accuracy, it is . believed, will commend them to the favorable consideration of all. A few of the topics suggested by General Porter are susceptible of some modification, although probably without much addition to their strength. The civil avocations of the secretary of war, which, fourteen years ago, he stated to be so numerous ' as to put it wholly out of his power to attend to the daily orders and com- plicated routine of duties which appertain to the command and discipline of an army,' so far from diminishing since that period, OF BREVETS. I3I have been augmented and multiplied to an extent that renders the argument perfectly conclusive. The functions of a secretary are of a civil and not of a military character, and are administrative rather than executive. His business is more to superintend the general arrangements of the service, regulate its expenditures, and enforce responsibility, than to exercise command. It can rarely happen that he possesses an acquaintance with the details of ser- vice, or experience in the art of war. By associating with him, at the seat of Government, an officer of rank having these quali- fications, the system is rendered complete, and the various talent requisite to the faithful and successful administration of the con- cerns of the army may be brought into operation. To devolve the peculiar duties of a commanding general upon an adjutant- general would be making him in fact the commanding general. All that would be gained would be a change of title, and instead of a major-general commanding the army, an adjutant-general would do so. The nature of the duties of the office of adjutant- general is wholly different from those of a commander ; he is, in fact, the adjutant of the commander; and we might as well abol- ish the office of colonel of a regiment and place its adjutant in command of the lieutenant-colonel and major, as to place the ad- jutant-generals, whose official rank is that of colonel, in com- mand of brigadiers. After the expression of these views it is scarcely necessary to add that, in the opinion of this department, it is impracticable, consistently with the existence of our army, to dispense with the performance of the duties appertaining to a commanding general-in-chief." This was practically the end of the most protracted and ex- hausting struggle on the question of brevet rank that has ever oc- curred. On March 7th, 1844, the secretary of war, Mr. Wilkins, in answer to an inquiry from the military committee of the house, reported that Brevet Major-General Gaines, whilst in command of the 3d Military Department, received the pay, &c., of major- general, that having relinquished the command and gone on leave of absence, he was only entitled to pay, &c., of a brigadier, but that as soon as he resumed his command, he would again receive the pay, &c., of a major-general, which compensation, it may be stated, he enjoyed all, or nearly all, the remainder of his life. 132 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS CHAPTER VII. After the re-organization of the army in 182 1-2, the questions growing out of brevet ranli, assumed greater importance than ever before, and letters and pamphlets bearing upon them were writ- ten, not only by officers of the government, but, in some cases, by civilians. One writer,, probably General Armstrong, formerly secretary of war, says : — " The care of the government, as abundantly proved by its different acts, has been to make and inculcate a distinction between lineal and brevet rank, and that distinction is — " ist. Brevets are in their own na.tuve personal, dying with those who hold them, and are in no case the subjects of transfer or succession ; whereas, lineal rank survives the present incumbent, and is generally coeval with the existence of the corps in which it is exercised. " 2d. Brevets become active only for special and temporary purposes, and not even for these, excepting on the designation of the commanding general ; in other words, they possess no inhe- rent right to command, under any circumstances ; whereas, lineal rank is vested with the rights of commanding within its peculiar sphere, under all circumstances. " 3d. Certain services, not merely important, but indispensable to the well-being of an army, are forbidden to be exercised by irevet officers." " A brevet commission becomes active only on services of a special and temporary character and with the will of the command- ing general. It gives only a limited authority both as to the scope and object of its powers." Questions frequently arising as to when brevet rank took effect, an order, as follows, was issued from the war department on the i6th June, 1827. " I. Brevet officers on duty, and having a command equal to double the commands which their ordinary or regimental rank ha- bitually authorizes them to exercise or assume, shall be deemed to be on duty, and have command according to their brevet com- missions : — " For example — " When a brevet major-general commands a division ; " A brevet brigadier-general a brigade ; " A brevet colonel a regiment ; OF BREVETS. 1 33 " A brevet lieut.-colonel a battalion, composed of not less than four companies, or when on duty as lieut.-colonel of a regiment. " A brevet major a detachment, composed of not less than two companies, or when on duty as major of a regiment. " A brevet captain a company ; " II. When any field-officer is on detached service or otherwise absent from his regiment, the senior captain thereof, having a brevet and on duty in the line, may exercise command according to his brevet commission, during the time such .field-officer is absent from regimental duty ; " Provided that brevet officers who may come within the pro- visions of this paragraph shall be announced in general orders, before they shall be authorized to exercise such command, or re- ceive the pay and emoluments of their brevet rank. III. The captain or other company commander who may be entitled to receive ten dollars per month additional pay, as com- pensation for his duties and responsibilities with respect to the clothing, arms and accoutrements of the company, shall not forfeit his claims to such additional allowance when temporarily absent on duty, for any period less than one month ; or when absent with leave, if not to exceed three days at any one time." This order in 1829 went before the attorney-general, Mr. Berrien, and he held it to be " a manifest innovation in prin- ciple of the act of 18 18. The principle on which that act allows brevet pay is, that the command of the officer is according to his brevet rank. The order dispenses with the requisition of the law, and substitutes another and an essentially different prin- ciple, namely, that the command of the officer shall be equal to double his ordinary or regimental command, not according to his brevet rank, but double that of his rank in the line. The act of Congress is thus modified and controlled by the order of the war department." Brevet majors and brevet lieutenant-colonels were the only officers affected by the opinion. By the order the former could draw major's pay when commanding two companies, and the lat- ter lieutenant-colonel's pay when commanding four companies, but by the opinion, based on the regulations and laws governing the organization of the army, four and six companies, respectively, were necessary to give these officers brevet pay. It appears that prior to August, 1828, general officers by brevet appointed aides-de-camp. On the 4th of that month the President ordered as follows : " Officers having the rank of general by brevet, will not here- after appoint aides-de-camp in consequence of holding, such rank, 134 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS without the permission of the war department. Whenever a brevet-general requires an aide-de-cg,mp, he will, through the proper channel; communicate the necessity of such aid, with his reasons for desiring it, that the secretary of war may be enabled to determine on the propriety of granting it." It was proposed in Congress in 1829, to abolish brevet rank. On being called upon for his views the secretary of war (Porter) reported as follows : " Department of War, January 14, 1829. * * * * * # * " In relation to the proposition for annulling the power to con- fer brevet rank except in time of actual war, much may be said on both sides of the question. The two principal inducements to the introduction of this species of rank, seem to have been to re- ward gallant and meritorious service on the one hand,, and on the other, to avail the country of its best talents in time of war, with- out a direct violation of the rights of lineal succession to command. The principle of honor and the love of distinction are amongst the most powerful incentives to great and useful military actions ; and it is the policy of the government to cherish these sentiments. To take a subordinate officer from the line of the army and place again in the line over the heads of those whom he has been ac- customed to obey, is a direct degradation of those who are thus superseded, and is calculated to destroy their ambition and useful- ness. To adhere, on the other hand, implicitly to the principal of regular succession, might place the army or an important branch of it, on the most critical occasions, in the hands of an officer wholly incompetent or unfitted for its command. The brevet is a specious and, at the same time, useful device to avoid such a dilemma, and to save the point of honor by doing that indirectly and for temporary purposes which the temper of military men would not permit to be done directly and permanently. The practice of rewarding gallant and meritorious conduct by brevets is too alluring not to meet the approbation of military officers whose objects are rank and fame ; and all are willing to take the chances of reaping its benefits. Even those who fail to ac- quire this distinction have little reason to complain, for if they have been overlooked by the government it is probably only be- cause fortune has overlooked them. The brevets of others re- flect no disgrace on them, and but rarely displace or incommode them in their regular commands in the army. By conferring on meritorious officers brevet rank, corresponding with the various rades in the line of the army, a corps of officers of rare and di- OF BREVETS. 135 versified talent is placed at the disposal of the commander-in- chief, from which he may select with great advantage to the service, those whom he may wish to employ for great or peculiar occasions." WT 'SF "TP * tP tF tF On looking, therefore, to the various considerations which the subject presents, I am of opinion that it would be better to sub- mit to the expenditure of some $30,000 or $40,000, which is an- nually disbursed to satisfy the clairns of brevet rank, than to de- prive these officers of this moderate, but, in most cases, hard earned pittance." In 1829 and 1830 orders as follows were published : " Adjutant General's Office, " Washington, 28th July, 1829. " Orders 46. " Colonels and captains, when on duty with their respective regiments and companies, although they may hold higher rank by brevet, are not absolved from the responsibility incidental to the regimental commissions, nor from any of the established duties of the rank in which they are mustered, except they be relieved in orders issued by some ' Superior.' " Accordingly all regimental and company returns, and other documents will be signed by the colonels and captains respective- ly, when stationed with their regiments and companies, agreeably to regulations." " Adjutant General's Office, "Washington, 14th June, 1830. " Order. " The subjoined order from the war department, is published for general information." " Department of War, "June i2th, 1830. " Payments on account of brevet rank, are prohibited except in cases which, having already been admitted at the department under established regulations, are founded upon settled usage. " Experimental receipts intended merely to ascertain the opinion of the department upon doubtful points, are also prohib- ited, and no pay-master, or disbursing officer, will hereafter for- ward any account, or claims for settlement with a receipt attached unless payment has been actually made by him. On matters of doubt, he will, before making payment, lefer the case to the de- partment for decision." 136 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS CHAPTER VIII. STAFF BREVETS. The act of July 6th, 1812, authorized the President "to confer brevet rank on such officers of the array as shall distinguish them- selves by gallant actions or meritorious conduct, or who shall have served ten years in any one grade." Prior to this date no stafE officer had held his position by brevet, and the act clearly designed to furnish means of reward for officers already in service, and not to create staff officers by brevet appointments. On the 3d of March, 18 13, an act was passed for the better organization of the staff of the army. The adjutant-general's department was made to consist of one adjutant ^nd inspector-general, eight adjutant-generals, sixteen assistant adjutant-generals ; the inspector-general's department, of eight inspector-generals, and sixteen assistant inspector-generals ; the quartermaster's department, of one quartermaster-general of prin- cipal army, seven quartermaster-generals, eight deputy quarter- iViaster-generals, and thirty-two assistant deputy quartermaster- generals ; the topographical department, of eight topographical engineers, and eight assistant topographical engineers. This act was exceptional in case of the adjutant and inspector- general. It provided that he should have the rank, pay and emoluments of a brigadier, and authorized the President to assign a brigadier-general of the army to that position. It specifically authorized brevet rank for the officers who might be called to the other positions named. The brevet rank of brigadier was pro- vided for the quartermaster-general of the principal army ; the brevet rank of colonel of cavalry for the eight adjutant-generals ; the brevet rank of colonel of infantry for the eight inspector- generals, and seven quartermaster-generals ; the brevet rank of major of cavalry for the sixteen assistant adjutant-generals, the sixteen assistant inspector-generals, the eight deputy quarter- master-generals, the, eight topographical engineers ; and the brevet rank of captain of infantry for the eight assistant topographical en- gineers, and the thirty-two assistant deputy quartermaster-generals. The act further provided " that the assistant adjutant-generals, the assistant inspector-generals, and the assistant topographical engineers be taken from the line. The adjutant-generals, inspec- tor-generals, quarterinaster-generals, deputy quartermaster-gen- erals, topographical engineers, and assistant deputy quartermaster- generals, may be taken from the line or not, as the President may deem expedient. And officers taken from the line and transferred OF BREVETS. 137 to the staff, shall receive only the pay and emoluments attached to the rank in the staff, but "their transfer shall be without prejudice to their rank and promotion in the line according to their said seniority, which promotion shall take place according to usage, in the same manner as if they had not been thus transferred." Although this act required that some of the staff officers for which it provided should be taken from the line, it permitted the remainder to be taken from civil life. The brevet was the commission by which all were to hold their positions in the staff. But brevet rank authorized by this act was in fact j-/rtjf-rank, and it was probably not the intention of the law- makers that it should be the same as the brevet rank conferred under the act of July 6, 1812, on officers of the army as a reward for meritorious services. This was strikingly exemplified soon after its passage, in the ease of Roger Jones, a captain of artillery, who was appointed an assistant adjutant-general with the brevet (or staff) rank of major on thQjd of Augjist, 181J. On the 5th of July, 1814, Brevet- Major and Assistant Adjutant-General Roger Jones was brevetted major in the army (under the act of July 6, 1812), " for distinguish- ed services at Chippewa." With a part of the staff the brevet rank was in the cavalry, and with another part in the infantry, thus indicating that it was limited in its character, these arms of service being mentioned as furnishing the measure for pay and allowance. In these cases the staff office conferred the brevet rank. An adjutant-general, for example, was, ex officio, a brevet colonel of cavalry. He was recommended to the Senate and confirmed to the office of adjutant-general with the brevet rank of colonel of cavalry. " In other words, they were not recommended for appointment to two distinct offices, one of adjutant-general and one of brevet colonel ; but to one office only, which office by law confers a certain rank." It followed from this that -"^en the staif office was lost, the brevet rank attached to said office went with it. This state of facts was peculiar to the staff brevets con- ferred under the act of 1813, and did not apply to the brevets conferred upon " officers of the army under the act of July 6, 1812." It was for the purpose of marking, in the practical affairs of the army, a distinction between these two classes of brevets that the regulation of 18 13 said : " Brevet rank gives no prece- dence nor command, except on detachments, nor shall persons having such rank only be included in the roster of officers for any duty other than that performed by detachments, and to which they shall be specially assigned." 7* 138 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS General Scott said that while the brevet rank acquired by distinguished services under the act of July 6, 1812, was held in high esteem, the staff brevets, under the act of 1813, became odious to the army and that the officers of the line clamored against them, and hence the regulation above given forbidding them to assume command and requiring them to await special assignments. The distinctive character of these staff brevets is further shown by the action taken in regard to them upon the return of peace in 1815. Richard Rush, attorney-general, on the ist of September, 18 1 5, gave the following opinion concerning thein : — "I have examined the act of Congress, 3d March, 1813, for the better organization of the general staff of the army of the United States in connection with the act of 3d of March, 1815, fixing the military peace establishment of the United States, and am of opinion that the brevet commissions which may have been issued under the authority of the former, have lost their force, and are no longer of avail to confer either emolument or rank." In conformity with this opinion, a gerieral order as follows was issued from the adjutant and inspector-general's office, September 7, 181S :— ■ " The several laws and articles of war relative to brevet rank having been duly considered by the President of the United States, he is pleased to direct, for the future government of the army, that commissions in the staff shall confer neither rank nor emolument to officers in the line who hold brevets by virtue of appointments in the general staff of the army which are superseded by the act of March 3, 18 15." The act of 18 15 here referred to fixed the peace establishment and omitted from it the staff officers created by the act of 1813. The result was that when the staff office ceased to exist, the brevet attached to it ceased also. But the brevets created under the act of 1812 were upon an entirely different basis. They, in each case, conferred office in the army at large, separate and distinct from the office in a particular regiment or corps held by the officer on whom they were bestowed. These brevets were not embraced in the opinion of Attorney-General Rush, nor in the general order, given above, of September 7, 1815. Although the act of March 3, 1815, made no provision for the staff officers created by the act of 1813, it authori-zed the President to provisionally retain such of these staff officers as he might deem proper until circumstances would admit of their discharge. Under this authority it was announced in general order of May 17, 1815, that the President had decided to retain of the generals and OF BREVETS. I39 Staff, two major-generals, four brigadier-generals, an adjutant and inspector-general, two adjutant-generals, four brigade-inspectors, one quartermaster-general, two deputy quartermaster-generals, four brigade quartermasters, an apothecary-general and two assistant apothecaries, five hospital-surgeons, fifteen hospital-surgeon's mates, two garrison-surgeon's mates, a pay-master of the army, two deputy paymaster-generals, and two assistant deputy pay- master-generals. Soon afterwards Congress took the matter of the general staff into consideration, and on the 24th of April, 1816, passed an act for its organization which re-established the act of March 3d, 1813, so far as to provide for one adjutant and inspector-general, three topographical engineers, and one quartermaster-general, with one deputy quartermaster-general to a division, and an assistant of each to every brigade, and two assistant apothecaries to the apoth- ecary-general ; these officers of the staff to receive the pay and emoluments and to retain all the privileges secured to the staff of the army by the act of March 3d, 1813. This gave them the staff rank by brevet established by that act. The act of April 14, 18 18, dispensed with several of the staff officers provided for in the act of April 24, 1816, but made no change in the status of the remainder. By general order of March 3, 1820, a board of officers- consist- ing of Major-General Brown, Brevet Major-General Scott, and Lieutenant-Colonel Arbuckle was directed to meet at Philadelphia to consider the subject of restoring again to the regiments and corps, from which their names had been taken, the several officers of the staff appointed under the act of April 24, 1816, and to report their opinion to the secretary of war. The Board, on the 30th of March, 1820, rendered the following opinion : — " By the law of March 3, 18 13, for the organization of the staff, it appears that the officers who were transferred from the line of the army to the performance of staff duties were secured in their right of promotion and in their lineal rank ; their promotion was to take place in the same manner as if they had not been thus transferred. The law of April 24, 1816, for the organization of the staff of the peace establishment confirms to officers transferred from lineal to staff duties all the privileges secured to the staff of the army by the act of March 3, 1813. As. the officers who claim the lineal rank on the authority of the preceding laws do not ap- pear to have made a voluntary relinquishment of it ; on the con- trary as they have constantly asserted their claim to it, and as no evidence is adduced to show that they have been formally dis- missed, the Board is of the opinion that those officers who were at, 146 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFF.CTS and who have been since, the organization of the peace establish- ment transferred from the line of the army to the staff are entitled and ought to be restored to the lineal rank which they would now hold in their respective corps had they not been thus transferred." On the loth of April 1820, a general order was issued approv- ing the report of the board and announcing by name, the officers of the staff whose lineal rank was, under the report, restored to them. The order further intimated that when a new army register was prepared, the officers named would be arranged to their proper places in the line, &c. On the 2d of March, 1821, an act was passed reducing and fixing the military peace establishment. It reorganized the staff of the army, but the staff rank by brevet entirely disappeared. There was to be one adjutant-general with the rank, pay, &c., of a colonel of cavalry. Staff rank by brevet was not again introduced until the passage of the act of July 5, 1838, which provided for it, to a limited extent however. The act authorized the President to appoint two assist- ant adjutant-generals with the brevet rank, pay and emoluments of major, and four with the brevet rank, pay and emoluments of captain of cavalry ; the officers appointed under the authority to be taken from the line of the army. From 1838 to 1861 the assistant adjutant-generals were the only officers whose rank on the staff was by brevet. The act of June 18, 1846, directed that "appointments in the line, and in the general staff which confer equal rank in the army, shall not be held by the same officer at the same time, and when any officer of the staff who may have been taken from the line shall, in virtue of seniority, have obtained or be entitled to a grade in his regiment equal to the commission he may hold in the staff, the said officer shall vacate such staff commission, or he may, at his option, vacate his commission in the line." For instance an assistant adjutant- general with the brevet of captain, who was a first-lieutenant in the line, was, when he attained, or became entitled to, a captaincy in the line, either to resign his position on the staff or in the line. Under this act most of the officers on the staff resigned their com- missions in the line. It will be observed that this act of June 18, 1846, speaks of ap- pointments in the line, and in the general staff (some of which gave rank by brevet) as conferring equal rank in the ariny, and the practice under the act, was universal in support of the idea that commissions on the staff by brevet, and commissions in the line were of equal value. It has been argued that, on the ground that brevet rank was military rank- in- the army-as distinguished from rank in a par- OF BREVETS. I4I titular corps, and therefore of a larger and more catliolic char- acter, it was, by the act of 18 13, bestowed on the general staff not as an inferior, but as a superior kind of rank as measured by its wider application. But no such purpose on the part of the law- makers has been proved. In fact there was something approach- ing absurdity in giving, these officers brevet rank in the staff, for there they belonged \.o particular corps, and, holding their positions in them only by brevet and the law forbidding the operation of brevet rank in the corps to which an officer belonged, they were ■without the authority which they most needed, that is, authority in their own corps. As before mentioned the officers of the adjutant-general's de- partment were, from 1838 to 1861, the only officers of the staff corps left in this condition. In 1861 they sought the change from brevet rank and cheerfully accepted the commissions issued under the act of August 3d of that year, which re-organized the department and gave to all its officers rank in the corps. Staff rank by brevet has not been revived. About two years previous to the passage of this latter act, the adjutant-general of the army (in an official report made in 1859), remarked as follows concerning these staff brevets : — "Notwithstanding this opinion and this order (which eventually became a standing regulation) the official Army, Register, prepared by the adjutant-general, and published to the army, contained for the years 1815 and' 1816 under the heads 'brevets and former commissions,' evidence of this staff rank opposite to the names of the officers who had formerly held the same. But this practice was discontinued after 1816 and was not revived until 1825, when in the Army Register for that year a list was appended contain- ing the names of certain officers ' who have heretofore held appoint- ments in the staff of the army with brevet rank of a higher grade than that which they lineally hold at present.' This list appears to have been discontinued from the register from that time, probably owing to the decision of a general court-martial at Fort Monroe in December, 1825, when an effort was made on the part of some of the members of the court to take their seats in virtue of their former staff rank, which the court resisted, declaring ' that brevet rank conferred on staff commissions did not take effect." An effort was again made in 1842 to give vitality to these old staff commissions by placing a similar list in the Army Register for that year, which list was continued in subsequent Army Reg- isters until February, 1848 ; since which time the question appears to have been given up by the department. In April 1843, the question again came up for consideration before a general court-martial, assembled at Fort Columbus, New 142 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS York harbor, when the court decided to reject the claims of the officers to take their seats according to their former staff rank. The case was referred to the commanding general who made an argument in favor of this staff rank, notwithstanding which the court adhered to their former decision, whereupon the com- manding general submitted all the papers in the case to the secretary of war, and on their being carried up to the President, the following decision was made thereon. " The rank of the officers composing the court-martial within mentioned having been settled by the Army Registers of 1842 and 1843, and the order detailing the court having conformed to the Register, the President is of opinion that the court should be organized accord- ing to such detail and proceed in the discharge of the duties assigned to them without prejudice to their claims of rank. The President being of opinion that these questions should be settled, if at all, upon a review of the army list, and neither hastily nor without an opportunity for full consultation." No final written decision appeared to have been made on the subject, but from the fact of discontinuing the list in the registers subsequent to the year 1848, as above stated, it may be reasonably inferred that the rank conferred upon staff officers by virtue of appointments which have been taken away by resignation or disbandment is no longer recognized by the Department. It may be proper here to state that the practice which pre- vailed in the service, arising from introducing into the army list the claims of these staff appointments to precedence of rank in certain cases, was one of the causes which led the officers of the army assembled at Corpus Christi in 1846* to memorialize the Senate on the subject of staff rank and brevet rank. Pending the consideration of this memorial by the committee to whom it was referred, the President of the United States on the i2th March, 1846, published an order directing that the regulation of Presi- dent Jackson of the 13th August, 1829, concerning rank and command, be re-established and confirmed. And on the i8th March, 1846, the committee on military affairs in the Senate to whom was referred the memorial in question made the following report : " That they have seen the order of the President of the United States dated the 12th day of this month re-establishing the regu- lation of August 13, 1829, by President Jackson, in relation to brevet and staff rank, and abrogating all subsequent regulations * This memorial was made December 12, 1845. The document is given in full, page 166, 167. The latter part of it is referred to in connection with the subject of j'^a^brevets. It is omitted in this chapter to avoid repetition. OF BREVETS. 1 43 in relation thereto, and believing the said regulation of August 13th, 1829, to be a correct exposition of the rules and articles of war in relation to the subject, and that the re- establishment of' said regulation has applied the adequate and appropriate remedy to the evils complained of in the memorial, and has superseded the necessity for legislation on the subject, the committee bring back into the Senate the memorial committed to them, and pray to be discharged from its further consideration." Although neither this order of the President nor the report of the committee touched the question of former commissions or commission of a prior date, further than related to brevets, yet there is no doubt that the memorial and the action of the Executive and the Senate thereon, caused the list of former staff offices to be omitted from the register of the army after February, 1848. BREVETS IN THE MARINE CORPS. The laws concerning brevet rank 'in our service have applied to the marine corps as well as to the army, but they have given rise to' comparatively few questions in that branch, from the fact that all of the officers belong to the same corps, and with the exception of the chief, who is a brigadier-general, there is no higher rank than colonel. The act of i6th April, 1814, authorized an increase of the marine corps by one major, fourteen cajDtains, twelve first-lieuten- ants, twenty second-lieutenants, sixty one sergeants, forty-two drums and fifes, and six hundred and ninety-six privates. At this time all of the usual regimental grades existed in the corps, and brevets were conferred upon officers holding them. ■ But the act of March 3d, 1817, fixing the peace establishment of the corps, retained no majors, the corps being left to consist of one lieutenant-colonel commandant, nine captains and forty subalterns. In this state of the case certain officers claimed that they were still in service as brevet majors and entitled to position and pay accordingly. The subject went twice before the attorney-general. In the first instance he held that " as no such office as that of brevet-major in the marine corps is recognized by any act of Congress now in force, the President cannot confer that rank under the act of 1814." In an opinion given in 182 1 he further considered the subject, elaborating and re-affirming his former ruling, saying : " It seems to me a palpable solecism in military language to talk of the existence of brevet rank after the lineal rank by commission (of 144 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS which the brevet is merely the shadow) has been destroyed ; and not less so to talk of pay graduated by a rank which no longer exists, having been abolished by positive law." A "brevet" in this opinion was regarded as a more shadowy thing than it had formerly been considered, and far more so than it subsequently proved to be. But it must be borne in mind that the attorney-general was treating of the question of brevets to grades which had no existence in our service. The grade of major in the marine corps did not exist, and therefore brevets in that grade could not exist. In a subsequent opinion dated December nth, 1822, in the case of Captain Wainwright of the marine corps, the attorney-general ruled that, while Captain Wainwright could not be brevetted a major in the marine corps, as the grade of major did not exist, he was, if entitled to promotion at all, entitled to the brevet rank of lieutenant-colonel in the marine corps. RAZEE. The reduction of the array in 18 15 introduced a novel species of brevet, which was then generally known and designated by the term " razee." Several officers were reduced one grade in corps rank, but were, simultaneously with the reduction, brought up by bfevet, so called, to the same grade from which they had been precipitated. For instance, a captain, retained in service as a first lieutenant, had the brevet of captain conferred upon him. This does not seem to have been in unison with the spirit or letter of the act of July 6th, 18 12, wherein alone was then to be found the authority to confer brevets. The 6ist article of war furnishes the more proper term in these cases, and that term is " commission of a prior date. " The Army Register for the year 1815, when the first " razee " took place, did not indicate by any special remarks those who held brevets under this peculiar system, the names of all officers who held brevet rank, no matter for what conferred, being therein exhibited alike and without remark. The following are specimens of the way in which this declension of corps rank and elevation by brevet were effected : — In the reduction of 1815, Major James Dalliba, of the Ordnance, was arranged as captain of the ist Artillery, to rank as such from August 5th, 1813, with the brevet rank of major from February 9th,i8i5 (the date of his appointment as major of Ordnance). In the reduction of 182 1, Major William Bradford, of the Rifles, was arranged as captain of the 7th Infantr)-, to rank.as such from July 6th,i8i2, with the brevet rank of major from November loth, i8i8 (the date of his appointment as major of the Rifles);* Brig- OF BREVETS. 145 adier General Henry Atkinson (who declined the office of adjutant general) was arranged as colonel of the 6th Infantry, to rank as such from April 15 th, 18 14, with the brevet rank of brigadier general from May 13th, 1820 (the date of his appointment as brigadier general). Act of March 3d, 1853, giving to lieutenants of engineers and ordnance promotion for fourteen years' continuous service as lieutenants. Sec. 9 directed " that when any lieutenant of the corps of engineers, corps of topographical engineers, or ordnance corps, shall have served fourteen years' continuous service as lieutenant, he shall be promoted to the rank of captain, provided that the whole number of officers in either of said corps shall not be in- creased beyond the number now fixed by law, and provided fur- ther that no officer shall be promoted before those who rank him in his corps." This act is somewhat in the nature of the act of July 6th, 181 2, authorizing brevets to be conferred for ten years' faithful service in any one grade, but it only refers to the engineer and ordnance corps. It has this advantage over the act of July 6th, 1812, that whereas the brevet obtained under the latter brought no additional pay or allowances, unless the officer receiving it was assigned to duty according to his brevet, the former gave to the lieutenants of engineers and ordnance coming under its provisions an actual pro- motion, with contingent pay and allowances — a very substantial species of brevet. It is still in force. CHAPTER IX. TEN years' service IN ONE GRADE. The act of July 6th, 1812, authorized the President to confer brevet rank on such officers of the army " as shall distinguish themselves by gallant actions or meritorious conduct, or who shall have served ten years in any one grade." The act further directed that officers brevetted under it were not to receive any additional pay or emoluments, except when commanding separate posts, districts or detachments, when they were to receive the same pay and emoluments as oflScers of the same grades, etc. The act of April, 16, 1818, said that "officers having brevet 146 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS commissions, shall receive the pay and emoluments of their brevet rank when on duty, and having a command according to their brevet rank." No case arose in the reduction of 1815 or 182 1, in which an officer who had been brevetted for ten years' service in one grade was arranged to a grade lower than he had been holding. If an officer who had served ten years as captain, and for that reason had been brevetted a major, had, in the reduction, been arranged as a first-lieutenant, it would have a cruel ruling to deprive him of the reward for the ten years' service already rendered as a captain, because he had to surrender that grade for a lower one. The law did not require such action, and it would not have been taken, as may be inferred from Macomb's case. On the 5th of April, 1824, Attorney-General Wirt, in response to a question of the secretary of war as to whether the act of July 6th, 1812, relating to ten years' service in one grade, applied to brevet officers generally, or more particularly to the officers of the topographical engineers, of the general staff, and such as had been brevetted, under the act, for gallant services, rendered an opinion that the act in question made no distinction of corps, that it operated on all officers of the army, that the evident intention of the act was to enable the President to anticipate a vacancy in the line by conferring a brevet on a commissioned officer, and that there his authority under the act stopped, and that he could not confer a second brevet for length of service on the same officer so long as the latter stood upon the same commission in the line which he held when the first brevet had been conferred. Understanding that the practice, sanctioned by Congress, had been to confer brevet upon brevet, for gallant actions, Attorney-General Wirt was of opin- ion that, while there was nothing in the law forbidding it, there were obvious motives of sound policy to indulge it. He discussed the question, how the principle (of conferring brevet upon brevet) would operate in regard to brevets for ten years' service in any one grade, and gave it as his opinion that "the service actually rendered for ten years in any one grade is the ground of promotion, and every officer who has performed the appropriate duties of any one grade for ten years, whether he holds that grade by commis- sion or by brevet, is entitled to promotion." For example : a captain who was brevet major, and had performed the duties of a captain for ten years, was not entitled to the brevet of a lieu- tenant-colonel, but a captain, who was a brevet major and had for ten years performed the appropriate duties of a major, was entitled to the brevet of a heutenant-colonel. On the 6th of December, 1826, the adjutant-general of the army OF BREVETS. 147 (Roger Jones) submitted to the secretary of war a list of officers who had been brevetted since 182 1, and with reference to those who had served " ten years in one grade," and who had not been brevetted, made a special report, in which he divided the officers who considered themselves entitled " to this species of promo- tion " into four classes : ist. Officers of the line who have " served ten years in one grade." 2d. Topographical engineers (brevet) who have " served ten years in one grade." 3d. Officers of the general ' staff ^h.o have " served ten years in one grade," and 4th. Officers of the line who hold brevets and who have been ten years so " brevetted." With reference to the 4th class, Colonel Jones remarked that it included every brevet officer of more than ten years' standing in their respective grades by brevet, but that there were no satisfactory data as to whether any of the officers of this class had " served ten years " according to their brevet commissions, and the presump- tion was that there was no such instance. Again, on the 20th of January, 1827, Adjutant-General Jones submitted a list of all officers entitled to " brevets " under the act of July 6t;h, 1812, for " ten years service in one grade." On the 20th of February, 1828, Attorne3'-General Wirt rendered an opinion upon a claim made by Major Worth which introduced the question whether the ten years' service in the same grade must be ten consecutive years, or whether the ten years may be made up of irregular and desultory services at different times in the brevet grade, interspersed with service in the lineal grade, the latter not being taken into account, and the former added to- gether so as to make an aggregate of ten years. The attorney- general referred the secretary of war to his opinion of April 5 th, 1824, and further stated that " the ten years' service contemplated by Congress was a service for ten consecutive years." He also took occasion, in this opinion, to call attention to the fact that the act of July 6th, 1812, merely authorized Xh& President to con- fer brevet rank, but did not command him to do so, leaving it to his discretion to say whether the gallant actions and meritorious conduct had been sufficiently important to deserve such a mark of distinction, and whether the grade and the ten years' service in that grade had been of sufficient importance to deserve it. On the 25th of November, 1829, Adjutant-General Jones sub- mitted to the secretary of war a special report on the claim of certain officers to " brevet on brevet," and to ordinary brevet pro- motion for ten years' faithful service " in one grade," deemed by: 148 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS them to be over due, but not considered by the Executive to be within the established rules of service. In this report, the adjutant- general took occasion to trace the progress of the principle which had governed in the case of brevet promotion on a ten years' brevet. He affirmed that the records of the war department proved that brevets had never been recognized by the President as an uniform basis of further promotion by brevet in time of peace, unless the officer claiming such brevet promotion had actually /^^r»«^^ the appropriate duties of his brevet for ten consecutive years, save on one special occasion. He referred to the opinions of the attor- ney^general of April 5th, 1824, and February 20th, 1828 (already cited), and said that while the practice of the government, in time of peace, for the most part had been in accordance with the lead- ing principles laid down in the attorney-general's official opinion, nevertheless there was no written rule or record for the guidance of the war department whenever the intricacies of the question of brevet promotion might arise. To insure uniform decisions and uniformity of action in this matter, a general regulation, dated May 17th, 1828, was framed, but was not published to the army. This regulation read as follows : 1. Brevets cannot be conferred for ten years' service in one grade unless such service shall have been performed for ten con- secutive years. If the ten years' service, therefore, " in any one grade " be made up by an union of separate and disjointed pe- riods, it would not entitle the officer to brevet promotion. 2. Brevet on brevet, for ten years' service in any one brevet grade, maybe conferred when the officer has performed the appro- priate duties of his brevet rank during ten consecutive years. If he should have performed duty, or have been mustered, in any grade inferior to his brevet during any portion of a ten years' service, the additional brevet would not be conferred. 3. If an officer's rank in the army be suspended by sentence of a general court martial, during any period of a ten years' ser- vice in one grade, he is not eligible to brevet promotion for the ten years' service which may have been interrupted by the suspen- sion of his rank." The only exception to the restrictive operation of the foregoing rule relative to " brevet on brevet " was in the case of eighteen officers, nominated in February, 1829, for "brevet promotion on war brevets conferred for gallant actions and meritorious con- duct," and this was the only occasion on which the chief magistrate consented to recognize such brevets as the basis of an additional brevet for ten years' service in one grade. In 1829, the Senate confirmed a number of brevets for ten years' service, and then ceased confirming them for a period of three OF BREVETS. 14^ years. The secretary of war, in his annual report, made on the 2ist of November, 1831, adverted to the subjects of these brevets, and urged the confirmation of those then before the Senate. He said that, so far as regarded the services and compensation of officers holding these commissions, the regulations then in force were just, and well calculated to prevent any injury to the public service, and that no officer could receive the pay of his brevet rank unless serving in that capacity when on duty, and having a command according to it. He then went on to make the follow- ing argument, showing the wisdom of conferring brevets " for ten years' service in one grade : " These brevet commissions presuppose experience in the officer, and are founded upon the presumption that circumstances may arise when his services may be useful in a more extensive sphere than that in which, by his lineal commission, he is required to act, and these circumstances will oftener be found in our ser- vice than in any other. Our regular troops and militia must frequently act together. When thus co-operating, the officers of the regular army take rank of all militia officers of the same grade, whatever may be the date of their respective commissions. This rule is highly beneficial to the public interest, because, with- out creating invidious distinctions, it gives to experience its proper weight. By granting brevet commissions, after ten years' service in one grade, agreeably to the present rule, experienced officers will be provided for command upon detachments, or at posts where the objects are important or the danger is imminent. " The construction which has been given to the law upon this subject has restricted the granting of brevet commissions upon prior ones to those cases only where ten years' service have been rendered under such prior commissions." " There may be some dOubt respecting the correctness of this view, and also the expediency of the restriction. "These commissions, except in the few instances stated, and those very proper, occasion no expense to the government. They are, in their operation, rewards for past good conduct, and incen- tives to future. They cannot be abused, for ten years' services certainly qualify an officer for a higher grade, and to attain by brevet promotion the rank of brigadier general, from the com- mencement of the term of a captain, requires a period of forty years ; and if to this be added the necessary progress through the two lower grades of first and second lieutenant, the prospect of a young man, on entering our service, is not very flattering. Nor has he much to hope for from his pay. It is barely suflicient to enable the officers, with rigid economy, to live respectably ; and few of them leave for their children any inheritance but a g-ooH 150 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS name. It is important that a just pride of character, personal and professional, should be encouraged in a class of men whose usefulness depends essentially upon the cultivation of such a feeling. This system of promotion, so useful in war and economical in peace, offers honorable objects of ambition, and cannot fail to stimulate the exertions of officers of the army." Notwithstanding this strong representation of the secretary of war, the brevets were not confirmed by the Senate. This inaction arose from the fact that the Senate had it then under consideration to revise the entire brevet law ; probably in consequence of Scott's controversies with Gaines and Macomb. The law in regard to brevets for " ten years' service," was a peace measure, and that authorizing their bestowal for gallant and meritorious conduct, a war measure. In 1832, a bill was introduced into the House of Representa- tives to repeal the law authorizing the conferring of brevets on officers of the army " who shall have serv.ed ten years in any one grade." Several officers conceiving themselves likely to be in- jured thereby, framed and presented, on the 2d of June, 1832, a memorial to the House, expressing a hope that the bill would not become a law. The memorialists stated that, in their opinion, the institution of brevet rank for continuous faithful service was peculiarly adapted to a state of peace, and to a military organi- zation such as that of the United States ; that in time of war the provision would be almost inoperative, but that in time of peace the system (brevet promotion for ten years' service in one grade) supplied a stimulus to exertion, without which, in the military service, as in all other conditions of human life, advancement in knowledge and usefulness could not be expected. The memorialists further urged that the additional expense caused by the system, under the law then existing relative to the pay of brevet officers, was very small in comparison with its bene- fits ; that only about one-half of the officers holding brevet rank were in receipt of brevet pay, and that the arrangements and exigencies of the service would prevent any considerable increase in the number. They also, in support of their petition, adverted to the fact that in case of the militia having to be called out, which often happened, " a major of the local militia, elected per- haps yesterday, may be to-day associated with, and would com- mand a captain of" fifteen years' standing, whose whole life had been devoted to the military profession." They expatiated as to the justice of the measure, and contended that, as the law in regard to brevets for ten years' service had been in force since 1812, the officers in service had a right to regard the prospect of OF BREVETS. I5I brevet promotion as one of the considerations for their services ; that to snatch the reward from those especially who seemed to have it almost within their grasp, whilst others, not more merito- rious, enjoyed its benefits, seemed excessive hardship and injus- tice ; and that to abolish all brevets (an impracticable measure), and to give the proposed repeal of the ten years' service brevet a distinct prospective operation, seemed to them to be the only alternatives consistent with good faith. In his annual report, dated November 29, 1833, the secretary of war again brought up the subject of these brevets. He said, " I have had the honor heretofore to submit to your consid- eration my views in relation' to brevet commissions in the army, and I am induced, as an act of justice to those entitled to them, again to present the subject. If no new legislation is contem- plated, nor any action of the Senate which shall change the principle or practice heretofore prevalent, no objections occur to me to delay any longer these promotions. The officers have earned them by length of service, agreeably to the established usage, and to make a discrimination, without any previous declar- ation, so as to exclude from diis advantage those who at this time are entitled to it, does not seem called for by the exigency of any circumstance connected with this subject, and, in fact, there are no very obvious reasons occurring to me wliy these profes- sional honors, which, in common cases, make no demand upon the treasury, but serve to foster those professional feelings which give elevation to the military character, should not be granted as they have heretofore been. " Under ordinary circumstances they would produce no practi- cal operation either with relation to emolument or command. When they should do either it would be precisely when their value would be enhanced by the very state of things producing this change in their operation, and when the greater experience of the brevet officer would entitle him to an enlarged command, and to a corresponding rank over those, whether in the regular army or in the militia, whose qualifications, so far as these depend upon service, are less than his." Neither these repeated efforts of the secretary in favor of brevet rank for ten years' service, nor the memorial before referred to, seem to have had the desired effect, as, on the 30th of June, 1834, Congress passed an act repealing so much of the act of July 6, 1812, as authorized the President to confer brevet rank "for ten years' service in any one grade," with a proviso, however, that " nothing herein shall affect any right already acquired by ten years' expired service." The subject was again brought up, on the 4th of February, 152 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS' 1835, by Adjutant-General Jones, who submitted to the secretary of war a report urging the repeal of the act of June 30, 1834, in favor of nineteen officers of the army, who, at the date of its passage, held brevets for more than ten years, and asking that, if approved, it be laid before the President for his favorable decision as to conferring upon the officers named a " brevet upon brevet." The list comprised the names of nineteen veteran officers of the arm}', of whom five were captains, four of them of more than twenty years' standing, and all of them more than ten years majors by brevet ; and seven majors, all of whom had served more than twenty years, and some more than twenty-five years. The list embraced all the officers of the army who, on the 30th of June, 1834, held brevets for more than ten years, but the rea- son they did not receive their brevet promotion was because the rule, adopted by the Executive in April, 1824, and never departed from (except in the cases of the war brevets before referred to), forbade the granting of brevet on brevet, unless the officer had actually performed the appropriate duties of his brevet rank. Colonel Jones was of opinion that this rule was adopted more to restrict the operation of the system to the narrowest limits — to service only in lineal or staff grades — than to any disability believed to be imposed by the law, and he argued that with the repeal of the law, the inference was that the policy of restriction ceased, and that the system of brevets for ten years' service being at an end, from and after the 30th of June, 1834, there could be no more repetition, — no more like cases, — if the list now submitted by him should be approved by the President. His efforts were fruitless. On the 26th of February, 1845, Adjutant-General Jones made another appeal to the secretary of war, in behalf of several officers of the army "who, prior to the repeal of the law (of 18 12) — in June, 1834 — for more than ten years respectively held rank, by brevet, of higher grade than their commissions in the line." In this report, he adverted to the one made by him ten years before, (the report of February 24, 1835, previously mentioned), and urged that the cases now presented for the consideration of the Executive were greatly changed in two important points : first, the number of officers interested was then nineteen — now there were only eight ; second, every one of the number would then have been advanced to a new or higher grade — now only two of the present number would be advanced (General Brady and Major Craig), and the effect of the brevet in the other six cases would only be to give to each ^ prior date of rank in the grade in which they held commissions in their regiments or corps. This appeal did not have the desired result, there being, an OF BREVETS. I S3 unwillingness on the part of the proper authorities either to repeal the law of June 30, 1834, or to make any exceptions to its provisions. War with Mexico soon afterwards broke out, and, in the competition for honors on the field of battle, the question of brevet rank for " ten years' service " seems to have died a natural death. CHAPTER X. BLACK HAWK WAR. The " Black Hawk" War occurred in 1832, in which the regu- lar troops, under Colonel (afterwards President) Zachary Taylor, participated. This war virtually terminated with the battle of the "Bad Axe," fought on the 2d of August, 1832, and, although important services were rendered by the army during its continu- ance, no brevets appear to have been conferred for them. FLORIDA WAR. The war with the Seminole and Creek Indians in Florida, or the " Florida War," as it is generally called, commenced in August, 1835, and lasted until 1842. In this war a large part of the regu- lar army was engaged from time to time, and brevet rank was exercised by various officers in it, especially by the commanding generals. This was done in accordance with regulations issued in 1835, which contained the following paragraphs on the subject of brevet rank : " I. Whenever different corps, or regiments, or parts of regi- ments, happen to join and do duty together upon marches, guards, or in quarters, the officer highest in rank of the line of the army, present on duty, has the right to command the whole, and give the orders needful to the service. Brevet officers, or officers having brevets, or commissions of a prior date to those of the corps or regiment in which they serve, cannot, by virtue of such brevets or commissions of a prior date, assume the com- mand." " 3. An officer not on duty with, or belonging to, any of the companies, battalions, regiments or corps, composing a command, cannot assume the command thereof." An^extension of these regulations was made in 1838 (November S 154 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS 2d), by Mr. Poinsett, secretary of war, in an order saying, " Brevet rank takes effect on courts-martial and courts of inquiry when composed of officers of different corps." So much of the act of 1812 as authorized the President to con- fer brevet rank for ten years' service in one grade was repealed in 1834, but those provisions were still in force by which he could brevet officers of the army who might distinguish themselves, ist, by "gallant actions," or, 2d, by "meritorious conduct." Not- withstanding the fact that the Florida war furnished about the only field for " gallant actions " since the war of 1812, the recom- mendations for brevets under the two heads were numerous. The following letters from the secretary of war and general-in-chief show the state of the case in 1845 : — " War Department, January 31, 1845. " Sir : — I refer to you the papers which have accumulated upon my table, presenting the claims of many gallant and meritorious officers of the army to brevet commissions. " By adding the transmitted papers to those you have yourself received, my object is to throw the delicate duty upon you of mak- ing out such a list, as may be deemed just and proper to be sub- mitted to the President, of those officers who may have so emi- nently distinguished themselves as to be entitled to the special mark from the government of brevet promotions. " I take this course, not for the purpose of avoiding responsi- bility myself ; but because it is proper that those cases should be first submitted to the commanding general of the army, whose long services, experience and knowledge of military affairs will enable him justly to discriminate and judge correctly of those signal acts upon which are founded the claims of officers to the honor of bre- vet rank. " It has not been my personal good fortune to have had oppor- tunities — so happily for many years thrown in your way — of wit- nessing the gallant and patriotic acts of officers who have been under your command and immediate inspection. Hence it is, that all the knowledge I possess of the gallant conduct of many of the officers of our army, in the field, and of the high merits of others in their professional pursuits, is derived from public and general reports — a very different knowledge from that which you possess. " In subinitting this subject for your consideration and report, t is proper I should invite your grave attention to the policy which in my opinion should govern the Executive in the distribu- tion of those special appointments which beslow, out of the spe- OF BREVETS. ISS cific course of promotion, peculiar honor and privileges upon the military officer who has had the good fortune presented to him, of eminently distinguishing himself in the service of his country. " The value of the brevet commission must very much depend upon the use made by the government of the power of conferring it. And whilst that value can be much enhanced by the caution with which the honor is bestowed, it may be rendered so cheap, by its common and lavish distribution, as no longer to be deemed an object of high and noble ambition. "You must be well aware of my anxiety to guard the rights, promote the just interests and secure the general welfare of the officer and soldier. But let us take care, that we do not lose sight of and impair those objects, in regard to the whole army, whilst we employ ourselves in the consideration and advancement of the claims of particular members of the body, however meritori- ous and patriotic may have been their public services. " I have the honor to be, very respectfully, " Your obedient servant, "WILLIAM WILKINS, " Secretary of War." To Major Gen. W. Scott, commanding, &c., &c. " Head-Quarters of the Army, Washington, February 6, 1845. Sir : — Your instructions of the 31st ult., respecting applications for brevets, together with all the papers in the respective cases, have been duly weighed and considered. " I fully concur with you that the subject is one of extreme delicacy, and that the policy of multiplying brevets ought to be most gravely considered. " As a proof of that concurrence, I beg leave to state that, al- though an active officer -in the war of 1812, and present, with commanding rank, on many particular occasions, then deemed of interest, I cannot remember having recommended more than twelve, I believe I may say ten, officers for brevets, in that war, although there were hundreds under my immediate orders, who rendered gallant and effective service — services to which I was mainly indebted for any little credit I myself personally obtained. For the immense number of brevets granted at that period, on the recommendations of other high and better commanders, to the great disparagement of that sort of rank, I was, therefore, not in any degree, responsible. "The same strict views which then governed me in such mat- ters, will be found embodied in The General Regulations for the Army, originally drawn up by me in i8?o-i (and re-published in 156 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS a second edition, 1825), in these words : (^Battles — general disposi- tion ' for, Art. 53). " ' 647. A written report of the day will be made by the several commanders including those of battalions and squadrons, to their respective chiefs, each in what concerns his corps. From the reports of those next below him, corroborated or corrected by his own observations, and those of his staff, the general-in-chief will make his detailed; report to the secretary of war, and put in orders, the name of every individual, without regard to rank, who may have distinguished himself in an extraordinary manner.' "'648. As reports and orders relative to battles, and other mil- itary operations, constitute, in the case of subordinates, the found- ation of military fame, and this fame the principal reward of merit [brevets, &c.], too much care cannot be observed by the general- in-chief in collecting information, before he offers the names of his companions in arms to the notice of government, and the ad- miration of the country. Justice and policy equally require that the names of individuals or of corps, failing to do their duty, should be given in like manner. Indeed, reports of military affairs are highly defective, which do not notice faults committed, as well as strokes of extraordinary courage or of genius exhibited.' "'649. To enable the general-in-chief to execute, with impar- tiality and fidelity, this high and delicate trust, his first despatch to the government ought, briefly and simply, to state the general and more important results of the affair, making his detailed re- port af terwardSr on full deliberation.' " Soon after the declaration of war. Congress gave authority for conferring ' brevet rank on such officers of the army as shall ' — 1. 'Distinguish themselves by gallant actions,' or — 2. ' By other meritorious conduct.' Sec. 4, act July 6, 1812. (These provisions are still in force.) " To bring any officer within either provision, it was then held, by strict military critics (and I professed myself one), necessary : " I. That he should render some signal service — that is per- form some act over and above what government might reason- ably have expected, under the particular circumstances, from a good officer or officer of medium merit. " 2. That the officer or the service should be susceptible of iso- lation — that is, easily separated, and not confounded with like services of many on the same occasion, and under the same cir- cumstances. To illustrate : an entire regiment or battalion of ten companies, executes a brilliant and successful charge — or, (thrown into a square), repels a heavy shock of cavalry on every side at once. In such a case, it might be impossible to distin- guish one captain or one lieutenant from another- of the same OF BREVETS. IS7 grade. The colonel, however, there being but one, as also^the adjutant, might be isolated and brevetted, and no other officer. (Such is the fortune of war, at which no soldier ever repines), unless, indeed, other regiments in the same line gave way under the same general charge, or unless again the distinguished regi- ment emphatically decided the victory, or saved the army — and then, in either case, government would probably think it no less just than politic to brevet, without exception, every individual offi- cer in the regiment so isolated in distinction ; and " 3. The scale of the service — the operation or duty must bear some proportion to the brevet in question. Thus, a lieutenant, at the head of some twenty men, beats or captures a like detach- ment ; or a major with two companies has a like success against about an equal force. Each commander ought clearly to be bre- vetted. Brevets are the cheap and peculiar rewards of military powers or genius. But it does not follow that they are to be cheaply won. Suppose a major, in the first case above, or a colo- nel, in the second, to have been the accidental commander. Ex- cept after a series of disasters, between like parties, I should certainly refuse to recommend the major for the brevet of lieu- tenant-colonel for having beaten twenty men, or the colonel for the brevet of brigadier-general, for having beaten two companies. The proportion between rank and command, on the one hand, and brevets to be conferred on the other, ought always to be ob- served — both in respect to open conflicts, and the other services contemplated by the law. To lose sight of this consideration would be to confound and level all grades of rank and all occa- sions of distinction. "During the long period from 1815 to 1841, although at least as actively employed as any other general officer of the army, I do not remember to have recommended more than the following officers : 1. In 1822 or 23, Brevet Major Thayer, the refounder and superintendent of the military academy (an officer of rare merit), recommended' for lieutenant-colonel by brevet. It was granted. 2. " In 1840, 0/(?«e/ 7(7//^«, chief of corps of engineers, planner and superintendent of national defence, by fortifications (also an officer of rare merit and services), for brigadier-general by brevet. Not acted upon. "3. Same date. Major Z'^/iT/f^/;/, superintendent of the mili- tary academy (an officer of high merit), for lieutenant-colonel by brevet. Not acted upon. "Jul}') 1841, I was called to this city as general-in-chief of the army, and in that year recommended to the secretary of war, for brevets, three officers serving in Florida. Their names were not then sent to the Senate. 158 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS " Prior to my coming into this office (July 5, 1841), there had already been nominated to the Senate, for brevets, on account of services in the Florida war, thirty-nine officers, of which nomi- nations, twenty-one had been confirmed. " By February, 1842, the number of new applications for brevets on account of the same war, had much accumulated. It was then that I received instructions from Mr. Secretary Spencer, to take the whole correspondence of the several commanders of the Florida army into hand, and to glean therefrom, the name of every officer whose services, in that war, seemed to entitle him to the distinction of a brevet. " A list of thirty-seven names was accordingly presented by me, in May, 1842, which was nominated by the President and confirmed at that, and the next session of the Senate. Four brevets, including two marines, were added at the session of 1843-4 (not at my suggestion), making, in all, sixty, which have been conferred on account of that war. " The new applications having again become numerous, I was a second time required (at the end of May) to report a list, and, accordingly, handed in one, June 5, 1844, embracing thirty-three names, all but five for services in the same war. Six of those names would have been included in the list of 1842, on account of the same war, if General Worth's letters, specially recommend- ing them, had been received in time. " It is understood that this second list recommended by me, June 5, 1844, was immediately nominated by the President, and at the same time yet another list, containing perhaps as many names of other officers which had been handed in from some volunteer source, without any agency or knowledge on my part. In my ignorance of the names on this volunteer list, and the grounds on which they were severally recommended for brevets, it is not for me to say that some of these officers may not be as worthy of the reward of merit as any who have been regularly pre- sented through this office. " It is understood that the nominations of June, 1844 (the two lists just mentioned), were not taken up, or not acted upon, at the session of the Senate which terminated in that month. Whether they have been renominated by the President at the present ses- sion, I have not learned. " Considering the great number of brevets which have been conferred within a few years, and that some sixty nominations yet remain to be acted upon by the Senate ; and considering the strict rules laid down above which ought never to have been de- parted from, rules substantially reproduced and confirmed in the instructions of the department under which I am now acting, I OF BREVETS. 1 59 beg leave, at least for the present, to decline presenting any new- list of officers for brevets. '• I have the honor to remain, " Sir, with high respect, " Hon. Wm. Wilkins, " Your obedient servant, '' Secretary of War. "WINFIELD SCOTT." " War Department, "March ist, 1845. "To the President of the United States, Sir: — "My attentionsince June last has been more particularly called to the subject of brevet appointments. I am now satisfied that the nomination of so large a number as were on the lists presented at that time to the Senate, would, if confirmed, lessen the merit of that distinction and render the honor which should pertain to it too common. Under these circumstances it became necessary, if I made any recommendations, to have the number reduced. For that purpose I referred the whole matter, with some general views of my own, to the general-in-chief of the army. His report, with ray letter — which I have the honor to lay before you — seems drawn up on the most correct military principles. After ofEering all the considerations which should fornt a basis in the selection of the names of officers for the honor of brevet appoint- ments, the major-general declines presenting a new or modified list of officers. He, however, places one name so markedly and prominently forward, as to be isolated from the mass of those under consideration, saying that ' in 1840 (he recommended) Col- onel Totten, chief of the corps of engineers, planner and superinten- dent of national defence by fortifications (also an officer of rare merit and services), for Brigadier General by brevet,' which rec- ommendation was not acted upon. Colonel Totten was recommend- ed to the Senate, in 1836, by President Van Buren for the brevet of brigadier-general. This officer is certainly entitled to the com- mendation , bestowed upon him and to the approbation of his government. The official intercourse between the Bureaux and this Department has thrown me in almost daily intercourse with the gentlemen at the heads of them, for each of whom I have contracted the highest esteem, both officially and personally. Although I cannot have the gratification, under the rule which I have adopted for my action in this respect, to present their names to you, it cannot be long before their merits will draw upon them the honors of brevet appointments. "I cannot refuse to concur with what I believe to be the opinion of the army generally, that it is both proper and expedient to put l60 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS some limit to the bestowal of brevets for services during the Flor- ida war. A number already exceeding one-third of those grant- ed for the many acts of gallantry illustrating the war, which is often and quite properly termed the second war of Independence, has been bestowed. One hundred and fifty brevets only, includ- ing nine officers who received two brevets, were given in the war of 1812, whereas fifty-nine brevets have already been given for services during the Florida war. " Were I noW to take up and recommend a list composed of the many officers whose names are pressed upon my consider- ation, it would swell the number to about one hundred and forty- nine. " Very respectfully, " Your obed't. servant, "W. WILKINS." The brevets for distinguished services in the Florida war are shown in the Register. The following liberal view concerning brevet rank and the rights under commissions generally was expressed by the military committee of the Senate, January 5, 1838 : Mr. Wall, from the committee on military affairs, to whom was referred the petition of Mary A. Patrick, widow of Captain Mat- thew Alexander Patrick, late captain ist Regiment U. S. Artillery, reported as follows : " The petitioner prays for an act of Congress authorizing the payment to her of the difference between the pay and emoluments of a first lieutenant and a captain, from the nth August, 1830, to the 4th Februaiy, 1833, to which he would have been entitled had he lived until the Senate confirmed his nomination, which had been made for three successive years and not acted on by the Senate. " The facts, as stated by the petitioner, are confirmed by the records of the war department. " It appears that the attorney-general has given an opinion, that, to entitle an officer to brevet pay, under the law of 1812, the officer must be 'brevetted,' and, under the law of 1818, he must have a ' brevet commission ; ' in other words, that he was not entitled to the pay and emoluments of his brevet rank for the period that he exercised a command equal to the brevet rank, between the time he became entitled to that rank and the date of his confirmation. This opinion conflicted with that of the secre- tary of war, and appears also to be contrary to former military usage, and does not now govern the action of the war depart- ment ; and the attorney-general, while he feels himself bound to OF BREVETS. l6l adhere to tlie opinion before expressed, tliinks it just that Con- gress should allow the increased pay in all cases where the officer had a command agreea.bly to the higher grade, after the brevet rank was actually due. " The committee are of opinion that, according to military usage, the commission confers rank, pay, and emoluments from the time of irs date, without reference to the period of its confirm- ation. During the continuance of the law conferring brevet rank, when the length of an officer's service brought him within its pro- visions, he was subject to perform all the duties, and to incur all the responsibilities and expenses, of his advanced grade, and took brevet rank from the dat:; of his commission, which, in all cases, corresponded with the time when he became entitled to such rank, without regard to his confirmation. Had Captain Patrick lived until the Senate acted upon his nomination, which had been duly made by the President from time to time, there is no reason to doubt that it would have been confirmed. The President, on his part, executed the law by making the nomination according to its provisions, and, had the Senate acted, his right would have been perfected by the confirmation of the nomination. The non-action of the Senate ought not, in the opinion of the committee, to deprive a meritorious officer of the right vested in him by law, and deprive him of his brevet, pay, and emoluments.. " The committee, therefore, think that the petitioner is entitled to relief, and submit a bill accordingly." The rules of 1835, in regard to brevet rank, already mentioned, governed until 1 841, when new regulations were issued, which contained the following on rank and command : — " 12. Whenever different corps or regiments happen to join or do duty together upon marches, guards, or in quarters, the officer highest in rank of the line of the army shall command the whole. " 13. Brevet rank, or commission of a prior date to that of the regiment or corps in which an officer serves, can onl)' entitle him to command when on detachments composed of different regi- ments or corps, and takes place in courts-martial and courts of inquiry when similarly composed. '' 14. An officer not on duty with, or belonging to, any of the companies, battalions, or regiments or corps, comprising a com- mand, cannot assume the command thereof. " 15. An officer intrusted with the command of a post, detach- ment, guard, or separate force, will not surrender it to another officer unless regularly relieved, except in case of sickness or in- ability to perform his duty, when the officer next in rank, of the line of the army, present and on duty with such command, will succeed as a matter of course. 8* 1 62 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS " i6. Officers having rank in the line of the army in the staflf, or by brevet, though eligible to command, will not assume the command unless specially put on duty with that intention." The regulations of 1841 continued in force until 1847, when new regulations were adopted, which, with regard to the subject of rank and command, were substantially the same as the regula- tions of 1835. MEXICAN WAR. The "Army of Occupation" assembled in Texas in 1845. It was commanded by Brevet Brigadier-General Zachary Taylor, colonel of the ist infantry, on duty according to his brevet, and it contained officers both of the line and staff who held brevets in addition to commissions in tlijeir respective branches of the service. Questions speedily arose as to the rights of brevet rank, which General Taylor decided adversely to the brevets, but submitted the matter to the headquarters of the army in Washington in the following letter : — " Headquarters Army of Occupation, Corpus Christi, Texas, October gth, '45. The Adjutant-General of the Army, Washington, D.C. " Sir : — I respectfully enclose for the consideration and decision of the proper authorities the following papers, viz. : "No. I. Letter from Brevet Major Rains, 7th Infantry, claim- ing the command of the zd brigade, Army of Occupation, in vir- tue of his brevet rank. " No. 2. Copy of reply to No. i, declining to make any change in the command of the brigade. ■• " No. 3. Letter from Brevet-Major Rains appealing to general headquarters. " I respectfully solicit a decision in this case, and beg leave at the same time to invite the attention of the general-in-chief to the subject of brevet rank generally, with a view to avoid difficul- ties that may arise in the Army of Occupation. " First, the case of Gen. Worth and Col. Twiggs. Is the as- signment of the former to his brevet rank in Florida effective here ? or would he, without such assignment, command Col. Twiggs on the general principles of brevet rank ? This case would become of vast importance in a certain contingency, and I deem it necessary for the good of the service that it should be settled in advance beyond the possibility of cavil. " Again the case of Brevet Lieutenant-Colonel Childs. It will OF BREVETS. 1 63 be perceived from my orders that I have assigned him formally to the command of the artillery companies serving as infantry, com- posing the rst battalion of the ist brigade. I have dqne this in pursuance of the suggestions from your office, communicated September ist, but there can. hardly be a doubt that Major Ewing, who is daily expected from St. Joseph's Island, will protest against serving under the orders of Brevet Lieutenant-Colonel Childs, and I certainly shall not require him to do so, without specific orders from general headquarters. " I have cited the two most prominent cases, in addition to the one presented by Major Rains. Others may arise, and at mo- ments when the safety of the army and honor of the service would require the most harmonious action. It is much to be desired that these points should be settled. It is well known that differ- ent views are entertained on the subject of brevet rank by the most intelligent officers. These views cannot, perhaps, be recon- ciled without further legislation, but the recurrence of difficulties may to a considerable extent be avoided by executive assign- ment. " I am, sir, very respectfully, " Your obedient servant, " Z. TAYLOR, "Bvt. Brig.-Genl. U. S. A., comdg." To this the following reply was made : " Headquarters of the Army, " Adjutant-General's Office, "Washington, Nov. 17, 1845. " Brevet Brigadier-General Taylor : "Sir: — In reference to your letter of the loth October, 1845, oil the subject of brevet rank, I am directed by the general- in-chief to say that he promptly laid it before the secretary of war for the consideration of the highest authority. In the mean- time, and by the desire of the secretary of war [he not having leisure at this time fully to examine the question himself], the general-in-chief gives the following as his own general answers to the queries you have presented :— "'Paragraphs 11, 14, 15 and 16, in the General Regulations for the Army, are all, more or less, repugnant to the law of the land, and therefore, to that extent, null and void. See the 6 ist and 62d of the rules and articles of war, and als(^ " the custom of war in like cases " — a rule of construction given by Congress in the 69th of the same articles. 164 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS " ' But it is further held that the repugnant paragraphs in ques- tion were subsequently rescinded by the heading to the General List in each annual Official Army Register since 1841. See that of the present year, p. 28. That heading, first inserted in the Register of 1842, was the well-considered act of the Executive. By it, and the General List, the rank, precedence and command of every commissioned officer in the army, down to captains in- clusive, " whether by brevet, former commissions, or otherwise," will be found to have been settled, annually, since 1841. " ' Any military rank (giving the command of troops) which enables an officer to join in mixed duty with an officer or officers of any other permanently established corps (as a regiment, a corps of engineers, or the marine corps) is, for that precise reason, " rank of the line of the army," in the language of the 62d article of war, as well as in accordance with the express terms of the 6 1 St [first part] and the heading oi the General List of the Army Register. Hence brevet and former commissions, as well as militia commissions [on mixed duty] give rank in the line of the army. " ' All military rank, derived from law, must be equally valid, except so far, only, as it may be restricted by law. The only legal restrictions on military rank, known in the United States, are to be found in the 6ist, 63d, and g8th articles of war. In the 6ist, brevet and former commissions are restricted in an officer's own unmixed corps, and, but for the 98th, any senior militia officer would, on mixed service, command all junior regular officers of the same grade, " whether by brevet, former commissions, or otherwise." No further restrictions can be imposed except by the same authority — the Congress of the United States. " ' The exception at the end of the 62d article — " unless other- wise specially directed by the President of the United States, according to the nature of the case " — evidently does not contem- plate that a junior officer should ever be placed over a senior ; but only that a senior officer may be prohibited from interfering with some special command of a junior. The military academy is an instance. That, although under the rules and articles of war, is, by a valid regulation, carved out of a military department, a division, and the general command of the army. " ' President Madison decided, in General Orders of July ist, 1816, that "regiment and corps, as used in the 6ist article of the rules and articles of war [are] synonymous terms," — that is, both are permanently "established corps" according to General Washington, in the case of Brevet-Maior McPherson. Rogers' American Biography, p. 325. " ' In General Orders, No. 11, of April 15, 1845 (signed by the OF BREVETS. l6$ Secretary of War), a brevet is decided to be, as it is called on its face — a commission. " ' If there were a regimental colonel in the present army of occupation, in Texas, senior to Brevet Brigadier-General Taylor's regimental rank, it would not change the command of that army, unless such colonel also held a senior commission as brevet brigadier-general ; and this independent of assignment — a term not more applicable to brevet rank than to any other rank. That army is a detachment from the army of the United States, and is, moreover, composed of different corps, and what is appli- cable to the whole, is equally applicable to- its smaller temporary corps when mixed. " ' The formation of such — whether temporary brigades, battal- ions, or smaller detachments — mixed or otherwise — depends on the discretion of the commander of the army of occupation — governed by usage, the actual slate and wants of the service. But when corps become mixed, whether specially or by accident, the senior officer in each " whether by brevet, former commission, or otherwise," becomes entitled to command from the happening of the junction. " ' In respect to staff officers, in the presence of seniors, assign- ment, by the common senior, is necessary, because to him it belongs to say whether such officers may, without prejudice to staff duties, and the rights of others, be assigned to the command of troops. In the absence of a senior, a staff officer, with senior military rank, as above, would clearly have the right to decide that question himself. " ' In the battalion of eleven artillery companies (of different regi- ments), serving in the army of occupation as infantry, should an additional field officer be deemed necessary with that battalion, by the commander of that army, the second officer of the battalion, whether such by brevet or otherwise, would be entitled to be assigned as major.' " I am, sir, very respectfully, your obedient servant, "R. JONES, " Adjutant-General." The foregoing letter was printed as a circular for the informa- tion of the army, and produced the following celebrated "Corpus Christi Memorial," a document remarkable for the ability it displayed, and for the number of its signers as well as the dis- tinction which many of them attained : — 1 66 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS MEMORIAL FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF THE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES. To the President of the Senate :^- SiR, — The undersigned officers of the United States Army, feel themselves imperatively called up(5n to present their opinions upon the subject of brevet rank, and respectfully ask that the same may be laid before the Senate of the United States, in order that the subject may be properly brought before Congress, to the end that a question which has more or less agitated the army ever since the war of 1812, may be legally and finally put to rest. The immediate occasion we now have for presenting this subject to your attention, may be seen in a letter from the headquarters of the army, under the direction of the major-general command- ing the army, dated "Adjutant-General's Office, Washington, November 17th, 1845," addressed to Brevet Brigadier-General Taylor, and which was printed " as a circular for the information of the army," by order of the major-general commanding, on the igth of November, 1845. Copies of this letter, it is presumed, may be had at the office of the adjutant-general of the army. The letter appears to have been written in reply to certain ques- tions on the subject of brevet rank, submitted by Brevet Brigadier- General Taylor, which seem to have been proposed with a view of obtaining the decision of His Excellency the President of the United States. The general in-chief proceeds to say, that the letter of General Taylor was " promptly laid before the secretary of war, for the consideration of the highest in authority," but that, by desire of the secretary of war (he not having leisure at this time fully to examine the question himself), the general-in- chief gives the following as his own general answers to the queries " proposed by General Taylor, and then follow the answers of the general-in-chief. (See Appendix A.) We cannot avoid expressing our regret that the questions sub- mitted by General Taylor, did not reach " the highest in authority," for we are persuaded that the unprejudiced and uncommitted OF BREVETS. 1 6/ mind of that high functionary, would have found ample reason to re-affirm the decisions of his predecessors in office, and which have been, as we believe, invariably adverse to the opinions of Major-General Scott. We know that the opinions of the late Presi- dent Adams were of this character, and that a comprehensive and remarkably lucid report upon this subject was made by General Porter, whilst secretary of war, under the administration of Mr. Adams, adverse to the views of General Scott, which report was printed by order of the Senate or House of Representatives, and may be found among the printed documents of Congress, about the year 1828. We further know that President Jackson, in a formal order, published to the army in the year 1829, decided the question of brevet rank, also adverse to the views of General Scott, the principles of which decision continued for a time to govern the army, but they have been gradually, step by step, undermined and must now be regarded as abrogated, if the principles expressed in the letter of the 17th of November, 1845, are to be considered valid. We repeat that we deeply regret that the peculiar position of Major-General Scott, with respect to the brevet question did not restrain him from acceding to " the desire of the Secretary of War," and prevail with him to withhold from the army the expression of his individual opinion, sustained as it is, by the weight of his authority and high character, upon this much con- troverted subject, in which he had been through a great part of his life an interested controvertialist, which makes it impos- sible to suppose that his opinions can be unbiassed, without regarding him as possessing a nature elevated above that of humanity. We believe that in common with the rest of the army, he might well have been willing to trust the decision of the question to the constitutional commander-in-chief of the army, and that it would have sustained his character for magnanimity, had he carefully and studiously abstained from forestalling and anticipating the decision of the Executive. It is not our wish, however, to occupy your time by general reflections upon matters which, however pertinent in themselves, may be regarded as collateral and aside from what we hope to exhibit as a clear argumentative view of the brevet question, and will, therefore, proceed at once to the merits of the question itself. In all questions of controversy, where men are divided in opinion, there must be some point where men separate from a common ground of argument ; and, on a close examination, this will always appear to be, among conscientious men, either the misunderstanding of some fact, or the misapprehension or mis- application of some principle. We expect to show, with the utmost clearness, that the real ground of what: we regard as the 1 68 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS erroneous views of Major-General Scott, so far as those views assume the appearance of argumentfounded on law, is the assump- tion of a wrong principle, one of the most erroneous and danger- ous that has ever been discussed among men ; a principle which has been warred against by the intelligence and liberty of nations since the dawn of modern history ; a principle by which King John was brought into conflict with his nobles, who compelled him so far to relinquish it as to sign the great charter regarded as the foundation of English liberty; a principle, in the struggle to support which Charles I. was brought to the block ; a principle, the partial destruction of which, deluged France with the blood of her people, and that is the principle of the despot, claim- ing to rule by divine right, and regarding itself as possessed of all power, except so far as in early ages it was restrained by the blind law of necessity, but which has been in more recent times, put under some restraint by laws, emanating from the wisdom and love of liberty of the people. We find this principle stated in the letter of Major-General Scott, in the following few words, to wit : — "All military rank, derived from law, must be equally valid, except so far only as it may be restricted by law." In these few words we see, indeed, that it is implied that military rank must be derived from law, which, in this country, is certainly true ; but we see also that it claims for military rank validity for all purposes, except so far as it may be restricted by law ; and this is the despotic principle upon which General Scott's argument rests ; thus placing in the foreground a false principle instead of that true one, congenial to the genius of our govern- ment, that all military rank is valid so far only as made so by law, and not in so far as it is not restricted by law. To see the force of this, we appeal to the Constitution of the United States, an instrument by which the people, or the States, have created, by a grant of powers, what we call the general gov- ernment, the power of which is not valid when not restricted, but valid only so far as granted ; all powers not granted being express- ly reserved to the people or the States ; and this principle apper- tains to every officer, both civil and military, created under the government, not one of whom has, or can have, one particle of power which is not granted by law. General Scott infers, upon his principle, that brevet rank is valued to the full extent of lineal rank, except so far as it is restricted by the 6ist, 63d and 98th articles of war; but why he has confined the extension of it to lineal rank he has not explained, which he should have done, since, upon his prin- ciple, brevet rank must be equally valid in all the staff corps of the army, for, in . the articles of war, there is found no restriction OF BREVETS. I 69 upon brevet rank forbidding those who hold it from claiming rank and consideration in those staff corps. If this be so, and General Scott's principle be correct, there is no reason why not only brevet ■ officers but line officers also, should not claim rank and consideration in all or any of the staff corps respectively ; for even the 63d article of war does not restrict line officers from assuming rank and consideration in the corps of engineers, but restricts the engineers from being subject to be ordered on any duty beyond the line of their immediate profession, except by special order of the President of the United States. What answer can be made to this order than by setting up the true principle in opposition to that of General Scott, to wit, that the officers of the various corps and departments of the army have such power and privileges of rank as are granted to them by law, and not such as those wherein they are not restricted by law ; and how can it be pretended that brevet rank is exempt from the operation of this principle, or how can the assumption be defended that brevet rank is valid for all purposes except wherein it is restricted by law, instead of regarding it as a creation of statute law, and thus looking to the law itself to ascertain its rights and privileges. So far then from regarding the 6ist article" of war (as General Scott does), in a negative light, as restrictive in its principle, it can only be considered as positive, and as containing within itself a grant of power and rights to brevet rank, and what is not therein, or in some other law, granted to brevet rank, it neither has, nor can have, under our free institutions. In order to show that the design of Congress, in the creation of brevet rank in our service, was entirely in accordance with these, to us, clear principles, we have only to look at the history of the service. We shall see that Congress reserved to the Senate of the United States the power, and made it the duty also of the Senate, to advise and consent to the commissions of officers of the army, and this, too, where officers attained to rank, even by regular succession upon the occurrence of vacancies. But they did not require during a period of many years, this advice and consent in the case of brevet commissions. This peculiarity cannot have originated in a disposition to clothe the President with powers to grant brevet commissions at pleasure, with the intention that brevet rank should be valid, as General Scott supposes, for all purposes except where restricted by law; and it can only be understood as implying the belief, that brevet rank is chiefly an honorable distinction, the .evidence of gallantry, ability or good conduct, and not possessing powers by which it would come into conflict with the advised and consented to commissions of other I/O HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS officers, except under the direct sanction of law, as under the 6ist article of war. When, however, in the course of time it appeared, as we sup- pose, that the distinguishing characteristic of brevet rank was somewhat obscured by the too frequent and indiscriminate grant of it by the President, the Congress of the United States saw fit to require tliat brevet commissions, in common with all others in the army, should be submitted to the Senate of the United States, and that is now the law of the land. It cannot escape observation that President Jackson and Secretary Porter, whose opinions have been referred to, had both been distinguished soldiers, and that the former continued for several years a major-general in the army after the close of the war of 1812. President Jackson was intimately acquainted with the question of brevet rank, and no less acquainted with the feelings of the army upon the whole subject ; neither had he ever been brought into collision with brevet rank in his own person, and must thus be supposed to have been in the most desirable condi- tion to form an accurate and unbiassed opinion in relation to that rank. That opinion was, as already observed, the very opposite to that now published to the army by the major-general command- ing. See Appendix " B," which is a copy of the order of President Jackson on the subject of brevet rank. If will be seen at a glance, that the principal portion of it has been almost literally transcribed into the general regulations of T841 for the army, as may be seen by a comparison of it with the 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and i6th paragraphs of those regulations, and of which the II, 14, 15 and i6th paragraphs are now designated for the information of the army by the general-in-chief, as " more or less repugnant to law, and therefore so far null and void." The possible contingent alternatives to which officers of the army may feel themselves reduced, by these conflicting opinions and authorities of the highest officers of the government compel- ling officers on both sides of the question to assert their sup- posed rights, at the hazard of their commissions, and if need be, their lives, cannot fail to be of the most dangerous character, " prejudicial to good order and military discipline " if not threat- ening their entire destruction ; and to this allusion the under- signed would, with all solemnity desire to call the serious attention of Congress, as a point of sufficient importance in itself, to show the necessity for legislation upon this subject. It is not our design to enter into a minute criticism of the details of the letter of the 17 th of November, believing it to have been sufficient to have shown, as we think we have shown, that its main feature and leading principle, is a false one, OF BREVETS. I /I wholly alien to the genius of all free governments : that it is a despotic principle with which the reason and intelligence of man has been in conflict for ages ; but, nevertheless, we cannot help adverting to a remarkable contradiction on the face of the letter, which shows how completely the general- in-chief was blinded by his preconceptions and determinations. He sets forth that "paragraphs ii, 14, 15 and 16, in the general regulations for the (army) 1841, are all more or less repugnant to the law of the land, and therefore to that extent null and void ; " and he undertakes to show this, by claiming for officers holding staff and brevet rank by virtue of their commissions, positive rights under the 6ist and 62d of the rules and articles of war. These rights, as he supposes, they are restricted in the exercise of, by those paragraphs of the regulations for the army. And yet towards the close of his letter, he says, that " In respect to staff officers in the presence of seniors, assignment by the common senior is necessary, because to him it belongs to say whether such officers may, without prejudice to staff duties and rights of others, be assigned to the command of troops." In other words, the President of the United States, cannot, in General Scott's view, restrict staff officers in the exercise of the rights they hold under the law, but a subordinate commander on a distant station, separated from all immediate appeal to the commander-in-chief, may restrict those officers in the exercise of those same rights, and may determine when they shall or shall not be " assigned to the command of troops." We cannot close this communication without remarking that we fully appreciate, and believe we understand the real intention and importance of brevet rank, and that the noble emulation it may give rise to in the army, when properly regulated, is of incal- culable value. But when not properly regulated, when rights and privileges are unlawfully added to the honors of that rank, making an unholy conjunction, the rank itself will be sought for under the influence of lowered, not to say degraded impulses. Those have little knowledge of human nature, who do not perceive that just so far as an unworthy object can be sought for under the cloak of a noble one, the means employed in its pursuit, will by a necessary contagion, become adapted to the inferior object and take their character from it ; and it is from this cause, as we believe, that some few have resorted to means and shifts to obtain the advantages of brevet rank, which men of unperverted feelings would not deign to use. By these remarks, we trust you will perceive that we do not aim to destroy brevet rank, but to purify it, by elevating it to an honor possessing only lawful privi- es, and divesting it of those intrinsic advantages which have 1/2 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS gathered around it by an unlawful war upon the proper rights and privileges of the line of the arm)^. We believe this object would be fully attained by a declaratory act of Congress, affirming that the rights of brevet rank shall be deemed to be valid, so far only as they exist by positive grants of law, and no farther ; adding that a detachment is a body of troops sent from the main body to perform a particular service and to be absent for a limited time. We therefore submit for your consideration, and through you for the consideration of the Congress of the United States, the propriety and necessity of passing such a dec- laratory act. It will be perceived that this communication has thus far a special reference to the unlawful extension of the rights of brevet rank ; but we desire to add that, in regard to the principles of the letter of the 17th of November on the subject of the staff, we feel called upon to express our dissent from the correctness of those principles. We have been accustomed for many years to regard what is called rank, in the organization of the quarter- master's department, as rank in that department, and so also the rank of officers in the commissary and other departments of the army has been regarded as rank in those departments respect- ively ; and we are persuaded it was not designed by Congress to authorize the officers of those departments to exercise command in the line. The first encroachment by which the officers of the quarter- master's department, since its establishment under present laws, began to consider themselves possessed of the right of command in the line, was in 1836, when an officer of that department was assigned to the command in the Creek county and subsequently in Florida. It was not until several weeks after the arrival of troops at this place, that an order was received from the major- general commanding the army (see general order No. 44, 1845), assigning several officers of the quarter-master's department to duty with the army of occupation, containing a significant para- graph in the following words : " they will be obeyed and respect- ed according to their rank in the army." This order on the face of it implies the promulgation of a new principle in regard to staff officers, as if their rank in the army had not hitherto been properly respected. The principles of the letter of the 17th of November can leave no doubt as to the origin and purpose of that clause in the order referred to. The order that the officers of the quarter-master's department are to be " respected accord- ing to their rank in the army," is now, by the letter of the 17th of November, to be understood as a command that they are to be respected according to their rank in [the line of] the army. The OF BREVETS. 173 senior officer of that department now with us, a colonel in the staff, might declare that if his" seniors in rank were to leave the Army of Occupation, he would assume the command, and this position we have a right to suppose would be sustained by the general-in-chief, notwithstanding the 62 d article of war, which requires that the commanding officer shall have a commission " of the line." What then has become of the distinction between the line and the staff recognized in all our laws, those passed dur- ing the war and subsequently ? See Cross' Laws, 1838. It will be seen that where the legislation is for the " army of the United States,," the act of Congress is so defined as the act of June 29th, 1812,* in the 5th section of which, the lines of artillery, light artillery, dragoons, riflemen and infantry are distinctly named. Sometimes the legislation is for " an additional military force," as the act of January 9, 1813. Again the legislation is for the " better organization of the general staff oi the army," — as the act, March 3, 1813, in which there is no legislation for the line, the line not being mentioned, except where authority is given to transfer officers from the line to the staff, as in section 4, &c. Occasionally we find acts of Congress for particular branches of the staff, as that of the 2d of August, 1812, and that of Feb- luary 8, 1815. The act of April 14, 1818, like that of March 3, 1815, is for "regulating the staff oi the army," and this act is im- mediately followed in Cross' Laws by the act of April 16, 18 18, for "regulating the pay and emoluments of brevet officers," which act is exclusively confined to that distinct class of officers. A few years ago, and down to about the 17th of November last, the expressions lineal rank, staff rank, and brevet rank, had each a distinct if not a definite meaning ; and it would have been as irrational to undertake to prove that a man is a man, or a horse a horse, as to attempt to prove that lineal rank was one thing, staff rank another, and brevet rank still another ; — but by the new principles just now communicated by the general-in-chief, "for the information of the arrov," those old distinctions are all broken up, brevet rank now means lineal rank, and staff rank is par excellence lineal rank, while lineal rank is neither staff rank nor brevet rank. Whether it is wise to regard the line of the army (we use the expression in its old and familiar sense) as a mere convenience for the staff corps or not, must be decided by the government of the country. Officers of the staff, by the late order, and by the letter of the 17th of November, may exercise command in the * Vide, also Sec. 12, act March 30th, 1814. 174 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS line, but in their own departments can elevate themselves and say to the line, " stand aside, we are better than thou, — we can exer- cise command in your branch of the service, but you must not presume to give an order in ours." How many years it will require, under the operation of these principles to break down the line of the army, will be estimated differently, according to men's sensibility to honor ; but the most dull and stupid must see that the usual 'order of military organization is now to be reversed, and the line of the army converted into an appendage to the staff. The wisdom of Congress might well consider the probable effect of this state of things upon the efficiency and character of the army, and by timely legislation provide against a consummation of evil in store for the country, under existing pretensions, orders, and the letter of the 17th of November. The major-general com- manding, has in that letter, but just now announced the discovery that the 11, 14, 15, and i6th paragraphs, of the general regulations for the army, published by authority of the President of the United States, are more or less in conflict with law, and so far " null and void." If the general-in-chief is thus forward to declare to the army that the regulations of the President, the constitutional com- mander-in-chief of the army, are null and void, he ought not to be surprised if he should find among his subordinates in the army, not a few who might he both able' and willing to emulate his example and improve under his instruction, until his own orders and letters may be pronounced illegal, null and void. To guard against this extremity we would respectfully suggest that the provisions of the 63d article of war, omitting the first paragraph, might be extended beyond the engineers, so as to in- duce the other staff corps and departments of the army ; as the undersigned, cannot entertain a doubt was the intention of Con- gress in the organization of those corps and departments. We would, in conclusion, declare, one and all, that there has been no " meeting for discussion " on the subject embraced in this communication, and necessarily no opportunity for arranging the details or the manner of presenting it, so as to guard against the possibility of passages that might seem to be exceptionable ; and we therefore desire it to be distinctly understood, that we disclaim all intention of personality in affixing our signatures to this communication ; and we emphatically declare that our only object is to present the subject in such form, as to awaken atten- tion in the great deliberative and legislative body of the nation, who have the power, and we trust will see the necessity, of legis- lating out of existence the causes of the present discontent in the OF, BREVETS. I7S army, which we are assured is on the increase and rapidly tending to disorganization. All of which is respectfully submitted. Corpus Christi, December 12 th 1845. Copy of Signers' Names. D. E. Twiggs, Colonel 2d Dragoons, S. B. Thornton, Captain 2d Dragoons, C. A. May, Captain 2d Dragoons, W. J. Tiardie, Captain 2d Dragoons, H. H. Sibley, Adjutant 2d Dragoons, A. Lowry, ist Lieut. 2d Dragoons, Lewis Neill, 2d Lieut. 2d Dragoons, Geo. T. Mason, 2d Lieut. 2d Dragoons, Croghan Ker, Captain 2d Dragoons, Delos B. Sacket, Brevet 2d Lieut. 2d Dragoons, O. F. Winship, ist Lieut.-2d Dragoons, F. Hamilton, ist Lieut. 2d Dragoons, James S. Woods, Brevet 2d Lieut. 2d Dragoons, Randolph Ridgely, ist Lieut. 3d Artillery, J. P. McCown, ist Lieut. 4th Artillery, C. F. Smith, Captain 2d Artillery, R. C. Smead, Captain 4th Artillery, R. A. Luther, ist Lieut, zd Artillery, J. S. Hatheway, ist Lieut, ist Artillery, C. B. Daniels, ist Lieut. .2d Artillery, Seth Williams, 2d Lieut, ist Artillery, J. Bankhead Magruder, ist Lieut, ist Artillery, R. B. Screven, Captain 8th Infantry, R. S. Garnett, 2d Lieut. 4th Infantry, M. Knowlton, ist Lieut, ist Artillery, W. Sidney Smith, 2d Lieut, ist Artillery, Thomas J. Curd, Brevet 2d Lieut, ist Artillery, H. F. Clarke, Brevet 2d Lieut. 2d Artillery, A. A. Gibson, 2d Lieut. 2d Artillery, Chas. G. Merchant, Brevet 2d Lieut. 8th Infantry, Edward Deas, ist Lieut. 4th Artillery, A. B. Lansing, 2d Lieut. 2d Artillery, ,W. H. Fowler, ist Lieut, ist. Artillery, William Gilham, ist Lieut. 3d Artillery, J. J. Reynolds, Brevet 2d Lieut. Artillery, S. Mackenzie, Captain 2d Artillery, John B. Scott, Captain 4th Artillery, Heniy M. Whiting, 2d Lieut. 4th Artillery, 176 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS D. H. Hill, 2d Lieut. 4th Artillery, Thomas W Weld, Brevet 2d Lieut, ist Artillery, William Whistler, Colonel 4th Infantry, John Garland, Lieut-Colonel 4th Infantry, Geo. W. Allen, Captain and Brevet Major 4th Infantry, John Page, Captain 4th Infantry, Pitcairn Morrison, Captain 4th Infantry, J. H. Porter, 2d Lieut. 4th Infantry, C. Hoskins, 1st Lieut, and Adjutant 4th Infantry, R. E. Cockrane, ist Lieut. 4th Infantry, Jenks Beaman, 2d Lieut. 4th Infantry, R. H. Graham, ist Lieut. 4th Infantry, Sidney Smith, 2d Lieut. 4th Infantry, Robert C. Buchanan, Captain 4th Infantry, P. A. Farrally, Brevet 2d Lieut. 4th Infantry, John A. Richey, Brevet 2d Lieut. 4th Infantry, George A. McCall, Captairi 4th Infantry, G. O. Huller, 2d Lieut. 4th Infantry, C. H. Jamard, Captain 5th Infantry, S. D. Dobbins, ist Lieut. 3d Infantry, George Sykes, 2d Lieut. 3d Infantry, E. B. Halloway, 2d Lieut. 8th Infantry, Alexander Hays, Brevet 2d Lieut. 4th Infantry, H. Ridgely, 2d Lieut. 4th Infantry, James M. Smith, ist Lieut. 3d Infantrj', Henry Bainbridge, Captain 3d Infantry, Wm S. Henry, ist Lieut. 3d Infantry, L. S. Craig, ist Lieut. 3d Infantry, J. Van Home, Captain 3d Infantry, P. N. Barbour, Brevet Captain 3d Infantry, D. S. Irwin, Brevet ist Lieut, and Adjutant 3d Infantry, A. J. Williamson, 2d Lieut. 3d Infantry, W. T. H. Brooks, 2d Lieut. 3d Infantry, J. J. C. Bibb, Brevet 2d Lieut. 3d Infantry, Robert Hazlitt, 2d Lieut. 3d Infantry, Geo. C. McClellan, Brevet 2d Lieut. 3d Infantry, D. C. Buell, 2d Lieut. 3d Infantry. Barnard E. Bee, Brevet 2d Lieut. 3d Infantry, Geo. P. Field, Captain 3d Infantry, D. T. Chandler, ist Lieut. 3d Infantry, John Munroe, Captain and Brevet Major 4th Artillery, John F. Reynolds, 2d Lieut. 3d Artillery, James Duncan, ist Lieut. 2d Artillery, J. F. Roland, ist Lieut. 2d Artillery, J. P. Johnstone, Brevet 2d Lieut. Artillery, OF BREVETS. 1 7/ Braxton Bragg, ist Lieut. 3d, Artillery, J. F. Irons, zd Lieut, ist Artillery, John J. Peck, Brevet 2d Lieut. 2d Artillery, W. Hays, 2d Lieut. 2d Artillery, J. C. Pemberton, ist Lieut. 4th Artillery, Geo. H. Thomas, ist Lieut. 3d Artillery, Arnold Elzey, ist Lieut. 2d Artillery, J. S. Mcintosh, Lieut. Colonel 5th Infantry, T. Staniford, Major 5th Infantry, Martin Scott, Captain sth Infantry, M. E. Merrill, Captain sth Infantry, E. K. Smith, Captain 5th Infantry, A. S. Hooe, Captain 5th Infantry, J. Lynde, Captain sth Infantry, J. L. Thompson, Captain sth Infantry, C. C. Sibley, Captain sth Infantry, Wm. Chapman, Captain sth Infantry, A. Drane, Captain sth Infantry, Daniel Ruggles, ist Lieut, sth Infantry, J. H. Whipple, ist Lieut, sth Infantry, Wm. Root, ist Lieut, sth Infantry, C. L. Stevenson, ist Lieut, sth Infantry, N. B. Russell, ist Lieut, sth Infantry, J. A. Whitall, ist Lieut, sth Infantry, George Deas, Adjutant sth Infantry, S. H. Fowler, 2d Lieut, sth Infantry, Robert L. Brooke, 2d Lieut, sth Infantry, Spencer Norvell, 2d Lieut, sth Infantry, John C. Robinson, 2d Lieut, sth Infantry, H. Whitney, 2d Lieut, sth Infantry, Pinkney Lugenbeel, 2d Lieut, sth Infantry, M. Rosecrans, 2d Lieut, sth Infantry, J. Smith, Brevet 2d Lieut, sth Infantry, T. G. Pitcher, Brevet 2d Lieut, sth Infantry, Jacob Brown, Major 7th Infantry, E. S. Hawkins, Captain yth Infantry, Francis Lee, Captain 7th Infantry, D. S. Miles, Captain 7th Infantry, S. W. Moore, Captain yth Infantry, R. C. Gatlin, Captain 7th Infantry, T. H. Holmes, Captain 7th Infantry, R. H. Ross, Captain 7th Infantry, N. Hopson, ist Lieut. 7th Infantry, J. R. Scott, ist Lieut. 7th Infantry, F. N. Page, Adjutant 7th Infantry, 9 178 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS F. Gardner, 2d Lieut. 7th Infantry, W. H. Wood, Brevet 2d Lieut. 7 th Infantry, C. L. Kilburn, 2d Lieut. 3d Artillery, S. K. Dawson, 2d Lieut, ist Artillery, D. P. Whiting, Captain 7th Infantry, A. Crozet, Brevet 2d Lieut. 7'th. Infantry, J. H. Potter, 2d Lieut. 7th Infantry, C. H. Humber, ist Lieut, 7th Infantry, L. Gault, 2d Lieut. 7th Infantry, Thomas Jordan, 2d Lieut. 3d Infantry, Edmond Bradford, ist Lieut. 4th Artillery, S. G. French, Brevet 2d Lieut. Artillery, W. H. Shover, ist Lieut. 3d Artillery, A. Doubleday, 2d Lieut, ist Artillery, L. N. Morris, Captain. 3d Infantry, J. C. McFerran, Brevet 2d Lieut. 3d Infantry, E. A. Hitchcock, Lieut. Colonel 3d Infantry, M. M. Payne, Lieut. Colonel 4th Artillery, M. McKavett, Captain 8th Infantry, J. V. Bomford, Captain 8th Infantry, R. P. Maclay, 2d Lieut. 8th Infantry, T. L. Chadbourne, 2d Lieut. 8th Infantry, Henry M. Judah, Brevet 2d Lieut. 8th Infantry, George Lincoln, ist Lieut. 8th Infantry, J. Selden, ist Lieut. 8th Infantry, A. L. Sheppard, ist Lieut. 8th Infantry. ADDENDUM. In order to put the question of the complete separation of the quartermaster's department from the line, beyond a doubt, so far as their commissions in that department are valid, reference must be had to the 9th section of the act of July 5, 1838, which is in the following words : " And be it further enacted, that the Presi- dent of the United States be, and he is hereby, authorized, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, to add to the quartermaster's department, not exceeding two assistant-quarter- master generals, with the rank of colonel, two deputy-quartermas- ter generals, with the rank of lieutenant-colonel, and eight assistant-quartermasters with the rank of captain ; that the assistant-quartermasters now in service shall have the same rank as is provided by this act for those hereby authorized j and that the pay and emoluments of the officers of the quartermaster's de- partment shall be the same as are allowed to officers of similar OF BREVETS. 1/9 rank in the regiments of dragodfis ; Provided, that all appointments in the quartermaster's department shall be made from the army, and when officers taken for such appointments hold rank in the line, they shall thereupon relinquish said rank, and be separated from the line of the army : and that promotion in said department shall ta,ke place as in regiments and corps." This section was qualified, so far as relates to captains, by the 3d clause of the supplementary act of July 7, 1838, in the follow- ing words : " that so much of said act as requires assistant- quartermasters to be separated from the line, shall be, and the same is hereby, repealed." By this clause in the supplementary act, the captains who may be appointed in the quartermaster's department, under the author- ity of the 9th section of the act of July 5th, 1838, are permitted to retain their previous commissions in die line, but the supple- mentary act does not extend the same privilege to the other officers (the colonels and lieutenant-colonels) appointed under the same section of the act of July 5th ; and, therefore, this act being in full force with respect to them, they are required to be taken from the army, and if taken from the line of the ai'my (thus distinguishing the line from the staff corps and departments), they are required to " relinquish " their " rank " in, and be " separ- ated from the line of the army." Be the line, therefore, what it may, the colonels and lieutenant-colonels of the quartermaster's department are absolutely, and without qualification, separated from it, for this is the very language of the law itself. And further, with respect to their rank, as if to guard against the possibility of misconstruction, the colonels of the department are declared, by the 9th section above quoted, to have, not the rank, pay and emoluments of colonels of dragoons, but to have the rank of colonel (in the quartermaster's department of course); and in another part of the section it is provided that they shall have the pay and emoluments of officers of similar rank in the regiments of dragoons ; thus, with the most pointed care, sepa- rating the rank from the pa}' of the dragoons, and it is the same with the lieutenant-colonels of the department. On no pretense whatever, therefore, can these officers of the quartermaster's department be assigned to command in the line by a " common senior," as General Scott supposes, and still less, in the absence of a senior, can these officers decide themselves whether they may or may not, " without prejudice to staff duties and the rights of others," assume the " command of troops," for this question is decided absolutely, by the 62d article of war, against them. Corpus Christi, December 12 th, 1845. l80 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS This paper was laid before Congress, as heretofore stated, but no action was taken upon it, for the reason that the President dis- posed of the subject in what the Senate considered a proper way, by republishing the order of President Jackson, of August 13th, 1829 : — General Orders, No. 5. " War Department, ' "Washington, March 12th, 1846. " The President of the United States orders that all regula- tions in relation to brevet rank and staff rank, promulgated since the 13th of August, 1829, be annulled and abrogated, and that the regulations made and promulgated on that day by President Jack- son be re established and confirmed, and forthwith communicated to the army in General Orders for its information and government. " (By order of the President), "W. L. MARCY, " Secretary of War." The following are the regulations promulgated August 13th, 1829, referred to above : — Regulations concerning Rank and Command. I St. Brevet Rank will give no command, except on detachments composed of different corps, and within the meaning of the 6ist article of war. 2d. Detachment means a body of troops sent out from the main body to perform a particular service, and to be absent for a limited time ; when such a detachment is composed of different corps, brevet rank will take effect in conformity with the 6isl article of war. 3d. Under the same article of war brevet rank will take place on courts martial, when composed of officers of different corps. 4th. In regularly constituted commands, such as garrisons, posts, departments, regiments, corps, companies, battalions, bri- gades, divisions, corps d'armie, or the army itself, brevet rank is not to be exercised, except on special assignment. 5th. Officers having rank in the line of the army, the staff, or by brevet, though eligible to command, will not assume the com- mand, unless specially put on duty with that intention. 6th. An officer entrusted with the command of a post, detach- ment, guard, or separate command, will not surrender it to an- other, unless regularly relieved from the duty assigned him, except in case of sickness or inability to perform his duty, when the officer next in rank, present and on duty with such command, will succeed as a matter of course. 7th. An officer not on duty with, nor beloneine to any of the OF BREVETS. 181 companies, battalions, regiments or corps composing a command, cannot assume tlie command. He must first have been put on duty by some competent authority to make him a part of the com- mand before he can assume or exercise the command. 8th. If different corps happen to join and do duty together, the officer highest in rank by his commission in the line of the army, present on duty, has the right to command the whole, and to give the orders needful to the service ; brevet officers, or officers having brevets or commissions of a prior date to those of the regiment in which they serve, cannot, by virtue of such brevets or commis- sions of a prior date, assume command. Case of General Worth. Prior to this order brevet rank was receiving throughout the army the high consideration which naturally flowed from the favor- able views entertained of it by the General-in-Chief. As the forces — all regulars — constituting the Army of Occupation in Texas came together, the claims in behalf of brevet rank became more difficult to deal with. The general result of the internal conflicts growing out of the questions which arose, is indicated by General Scott's letter of November 17, 1845, the Corpus Christi Memorial of December 12th, 1845, 3-"^ the General Order from the War Department of March 12th, 1846, all of which are given in full above. But, notwithstanding the terms and evident pur- pose of the General Order last mentioned, it failed to secure prompt and cheerful obedience. The Army of Occupation itself was commanded by Zachary Taylor, colonel 6th Infantry, April 4th, 1832, and brigadier-general by brevet, December 25th, 1837. One of the brigades in it was commanded by David E. Twiggs, colonel 2d Dragoons, June 8th, 1836, who had no brevet rank. The other brigade was commanded by William J. Worth, colonel 8th Infantry, July 7th, 1838, who was also brigadier-general by brevet, March ist, 1842. A question of rank arose between Twiggs and Worth, the latter claiming precedence by virtue of his brevet, although the former was the senior colonel. Fortunately, Taylor was the senior, both by corps and brevet commission, so that the dispute did not in- volve him. Worth's claims, based upon his brevet, were known to be in harmony with the views of the general-in-chief of the army, and perhaps they derived some force from the official Army Register. While General Macomb was general-in-chief, the Re- gister contained a set of tables, in which the field-officers and cap- 1 82 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS tains' of artillery, cavalry, and infantry were arranged according to ranlc in their respective arras of service ; also another table, in which the officers of all three of these arms were arranged accord- ing to rank — that is, by the dates of their corps commissions in each grade, tliere being no classification by brevet. General Macomb died June 2Sth, 1841, and General Scott suc- ceeded him as general-in-chief. The Army Register for 1842 contained the first set of tables just mentioned, but the second was omitted, and in its place there was " A list of the general officers of the army and of the field-officers and captains, arranged so as to designate their relative rank, whether by brevet, former commission, or otherwise, when serving on courts-martial, or on detachments composed of different corps." This list contained ofi&cers of the staff as well as line. Prece- dence was accorded to the highest commission held, whether corps commission, former commission, or brevet. This arrangement reappeared in all the Registers up to and including that for 1845. I" this table Worth, though still colonel of the 8th In- fantry, and as such, junior to Twiggs, appeared under the head of " Brigadier Generals ;" whereas Twiggs, who had no brevet, was classed under the head of " Colonels." This form, while it could not affect the rights involved, was expressive of the views enter- tained at army head-quarters, and doubtless served as an encour- agement to Worth in the controversy he entered upon. The form disappeared from the Army Register after 1845, probably as a consequence of the Corpus Christi Memorial and War Depart- ment General Order of March 12th, 1846, heretofore given. General Taylor directed, on February 24th, 1846, that Twiggs, " senior officer," should take command of the field on a general review of the army. Worth decided to test the matter of rank on this order, declined to yield precedence to Twiggs, and submitted the following letter to General Taylor : — ■' Head-quarters First Brigade, Army of Occupation, "Corpus Christi, Texas, 24th Feb., 1846. " Sir, — I have the honor to acknowledge the receipt this even- ing of your after order of this date, in which it is directed that, on the muster of the army for general review and inspection to-morrow. Colonel Twiggs, 2d Dragoons, as 'senior officer,' is to take com- mand on the field. While I deny that seniority in our respective positions, circumstances, and rank in the army, I am fully aware that my own previous action, %vithin my own b?-igade, in apparently analogous cases, involved apparent inconsistency. That action looked solely to the harmony and real interests of the service in hand, and resulted from a failure to get a decision from superior OF BREVETS. 1 83 authority. Nevertheless, instead of discussing these matters in a camp, highly excited, I reserved my own rights, held myself in readiness to resist, under law and military usage, any invasion thereof, and if such be the termination of a long service, to sacri- fice myself on the issue. " I have, therefore, in the spirit of subordination and entire personal respect, to say, that I cannot, without surrender of every consideration which gives value to my commission, render myself subject to the appointed authority. " The pain I experience in prescribing to myself this course, can be to no one more apparent than the veteran and gallant commander of this army." " Copy of indorsements on the above : " Remark, — " This letter was not designed as an argument, much less a protest ; for that I reserve myself when standing upon my rights before a competent authority, or a tribunal of my peers, — but simply as a respectful notice to my commanding general, that I should absent myself from the parade, and encounter the painful consequences, whatever they might be. "(Signed,) W. J. WORTH. " This paper was furnished me by Genl. Worth, with the request that I would enclose it to Genl. Scott. "(Signed,) S.CHURCHILL, "Ins. Genl. " This letter will be placed on file. "(Signed,) R. JONES." Worth had now fully entered upon the course which General Scott had, long before pursued in relation to General Macomb. That is, he insisted that his brevet made him senior to Twiggs, although Twiggs was the senior by corps commission, and he refused to obey the orders of their common commander, requir- ing him to act under Twiggs' direction ; looking for justification to a " tribunal of his peers." As the sequel shows, he shared the fate of his illustrious model. On the 2d of April, he sent — from camp opposite Matamoras — his resignation (addressed to " the Honorable the Secretary of War,") in the following terms : " I have the honor herewith to tender the resignation of my commis- sion as colonel of the 8th Regiment, U. S. Infantry, and my higher commission as brigadier-general by brevet in the U. S. Army." The prominence which he gave to his " higher commission " will not escape notice. 184 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS It probably did not occur to him that while he claimed the right to resign both of his commissions, the doubtful point might be disposed of for the time by his giving up the latter one only. In that case, his command, the ist Brigade, would have remained the same, and the government would not have lost his services during important operations. At the same time he wrote requesting General Taylor to do him the favor to forward his resignation by the first opportunity, adding, " as the prospect is so slight, and daily diminishing, of active field service, I feel at liberty to ask a leave of absence for sixty days, and to be permitted to withdraw from the army at the earliest moment that the General will be pleased to dispense with my services." General Taylor simply indorsed the resignation " Respectfully submitted," but on the 15th of April, evidently with this case among others in his mind, he said in a letter to the Adjutant-General, " Several resignations of officers have been tendered since our arrival here. While I regret that such has been the case, I have still deemed it my duty to throw no obstacle in the way of their acceptance." Later in the day (April 2d) General Worth, with evident mis- givings as to the wisdom of his course, wrote a second letter to General Taylor in which he somewhat modified his request to retire, and at the same time graciously offered to serve General' Taylor " out of authority." His letter is as follows : — " Hd. Qrs. 1ST Brigade, Army of Occupation, " Camp near Matamoras, 2d April, 1846. " General, " The bearer of your despatches having left, I cannot permit a moment to pass before pressing upon your kind consideration the hope that you will be pleased immediately to relieve me from a command which you had the confidence to confer, and in which, with all the ardor of my nature, and to the best of my ability, I have sought to serve you and the country. If there is any form or manner in which, out of authority, I can serve you, it is hardly necessary to say with what alacrity I shall always be at your command. " At the earliest moment when you may feel assured that no conflict is at hand, I shall feel much gratified by being allowed to retire, and not before." General Taylor acted in the matter with fairness, firmness, and consummate ability. On the 8th of April, he published the following order : — of brevets. i 85 " Hd. Qrs. Army of Occupation, " Camp near Matamoras, Texas, April 8th, 1846. " Orders. ) No. 42.) Extract. "i. Bvt. Brig.-Genl. Worth, having tendered his resignation has leave of absence until the 31st of May, and will be relieved in the command of the ist Brigade by Bvt. Lt.-Col. Belknap. Lieut. L. Smith, 8th Infantry, A.D.C. to the General, will accom- pany him and receive his orders and instructions. "2. In announcing the withdrawal of General Worth from the Army of Occupation, the Commanding General takes occasion to express his thanks for the zeal and ability with which that officer has discharged the important duties confided to him, and his regret that circumstances should deprive the army of his services. " By order of Brig.-Genl. Taylor. " (Signed,) W. W. S. BLISS, " Asst. Adjt. Genl." General Worth started north, but was detained some days at Point Isabel by bad weather. On the 13th of April, having left the army, he wrote General Taylor from that place, saying, " my services are entirely at your command at any time, place, or moment." To this General Taylor, on the i4tli April, replied as follows : — " Head Qrs. Army of Occupation, "Camp near Matamoras, April 14th, 1846. " General, " Your esteemed letter of yesterday's date was duly received, and I sincerely thank you for the offer of your services. Had we been attacked, or there was a decided probability that such would be the case from the other side, I would gladly have availed my- self of them, as I know your head, heart and hand would have been with us even to the death if necessary in such a contingency. "When I wrote to Major Monroe the other day. General Ampudia had just reached Matamoras with a small reinforcement of cavalry, assumed command and at once ordered all Americans in the city to leave for Victoria, one hundred and fifty miles in the interior, in twenty-four hours, and the next day, the 12th, notified me to leave for the east bank of the Nueces, also in 24 hours, in case of my not doing so, war would be the result. I in- formed him that I had been ordered by my government to take and occupy a position on the left bank of the Rio Grande, which I had done, and from which I could not recede except by an 9* 1 86 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS order from the same quarter that brought me here ; the movement in question was expected by my government, would have been a peaceful one, and that he was fully at liberty to make it otherwise at any moment he might see fit to do so, in which case he would be responsible for all the consequences resulting from the same. Since when I have heard nothing further from him, and I imagine I will not except in the way of protests, remonstrances, &c. At any rate until ray communication can go to the city of Mexico, be acted on there, the measures to be pursued growing out of it, de- cided upon and received at Matamoras before anything stronger than paper bulletins will be received by us. At the same time I must be if possible fully prepared at all times to meet any event or occurrence which may arise. Under this state of things I could not ask you to return. " The weather here since you left has been wretched, and from present appearances will continue so for some time, which has made us all quite miserable ; I presume it was no better at Point Isabel, if so you must have had anything but a comfortable time of it there. We have heard nothing certain as regards the fate of Col. Cross. ■' Wishing that matters at Washington may be so arranged as will do away the necessity of your retiring from the service, " I remain with respect and esteem, " Your obedient servant. "Z. TAYLOR." On the i6th of April, with a heavy heart. Worth wrote the fol- lowing letter to General Taylor : — " Point Isabel, 20th ult. P.M. April i6th, 1846. " General, " I am this moment in receipt of your kind and obliging favor of the 14th, and shall, in half an hour, embark with a heart lessened in some degree of its oppressive burden. I con- gratulate you on the turn of events ; the enemy has now fired his gun and will surrender the boundary as submissively as he pro- fessed the determination heroically to resist. Your duties will be those of pacification, the more agreeable, because, more conform- able to the policy of our government. Would to God I could go better assured of the fate of Cross. I strongly incline to the belief that CanaHes' people, acting on the suggestion of Carabahal, may have laid a snare for him in the hope it might provoke you to commence hostilities. Recollect what I reported to you of the language which the latter addressed to me after his parting with OF BREVETS. 1 8/ you at Isabel. It is possible I may go to Washington as you advise. Wishing you all success and honor, I remain, General, very truly." Having dispatched this communication, General Worth, in de- ference to his brevet, embarked and unwittingly sailed away from battle-fields upon which half the army would have been under his command. His resignation had preceded him to Washington. It was en- dorsed as follows by General Scott on the 7 th of May : — " It is with the deepest emotions, arising out of ancient friend- ship and companionship in battle, that I respectfully lay this letter before the secretary of war, hoping that it may be held under advisement until the arrival of Brevet Brigadier-General Worth, who may now soon be expected. It need scarcely be added, that, in my humble opinion, the United States have not had, in ray time, an airmy officer superior, in general merit, according to his re- spective grades, to General Worth, and certainly but very few who are his equals. His loss to the service now, when in the highest usefulness, would be seriously great-^=-nay, irreparable. " This letter only got here by the last night's mail, with one from Brevet Brig.-Genl. Taylor, dated April 15th. The accom- panying order oEGenl. T. was transmitted, by him, about the 13th, and was received here the 29th. " But Genl. T. has not even yet transmitted another letter to him from Genl. Worth, of the same date (I think) with April 2d. I saw a copy of it in the hands of a third person here, eight days ago. In that letter, also official (like this) Genl. W. distinctly says he does not wish his resignation accepted, or that he does not wish to leave that army, if (of course, in the opinion of Genl. T.) there is any probability of any conflict between it and the Mex- ican forces. Genl. Taylor's order, herewith, relieving Genl. W. of course, negatives that probability, and Genl. T. was the best judge of probabilities. Genl. Worth's second or separate letter is material and ought to have been transmitted. The two were evidently intended by him to go together. I fully concur with both Generals Taylor and Worth, that, without a formal declar- ation of war, published here or at the capital of Mexico, there is no likelihood of a conflict of arms on the Rio Grande del Norte. " Respectfully submitted " WINFIELD SCOTT. " It did not become necessary for the authorities to consider the partial plea made in the foregoing indorsement by General Scott for General Worth. While he was writing that there was no 1 88 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS likelihood of an early conflict of arms, the guns of Fort Brown, far beyond his hearing, were announcing the impending battle. Palo Alto was fought next day. May 8th, one-half of the victorious army being commanded by General Worth's rival, and the other half by his successor. Then he fully realized the position in which the brevet contro- versy placed him, and on the 9th of May, being still in Washing- ton, he wrote to the Adjutant General as follows : " Reliable information which I have this moment received from the headquarters of the army in front of Matamoras makes it not only a duty but accords with my inclination to request permis- sion to recall my resignation, and that I be ordered, or permitted, forthwith to return to, and take command of the troops from which I was separated on the 6th of April by Order No. 43, Army of Occupation." This v;as " fully approved " by the secretary of war, and on the nth of May, General Worih started back to Texas, and without securing any concession on the brevet claim, to which he had sacrificed so much, resumed the position he had so unfortunately relinquished. In relation to the memorial of the officers from Corpus Christi, General Scott, the ablest and most earnest champion of brevet rank, maintained, in a letter dated February 18, 1846, as he had alwa3'S done, that "rank, in the military acceptance, always implies command." In support of this view, he quoted author- ities, among them, Samuel, who, in commenting on the British articles of war, says that rank and command are " mutative terms," and Washington, who said " Military rank and eligibility to com- mand are ideas which cannot be separated." The quotation from Washington manifestly fails to support the view in favor of which it is adduced, for he does not say rank and command, but rank and eligibility to command, evidently implying the necessity of assignment to make rank effective. That this is his meaning is further shown by the fact that he used the language quoted in relation to an officer holding rank by brevet, but who had no command until assigned by Washington, and the controversy which arose was not upon the officer's rank but upon his assign- ment. Whereupon Washington defended his action upon the ground that the officer's rank rendered him eligible to command, and that the question of the propriety of and necessity for the assignment, according to the rank held, was one which belonged to him. Washington did not pretend that the officer — Major McPherson — had a right to the command, nor did Major McPher- son set up such claim. The position held by Scott (the general-in-chief of the army) that rank always implied command=^breye|: rank being rqnk:^ OF BREVETS. I 89 though of a special kind — covered so much, that it doubtless had some influence in producing the reaction which finally set in, and overthrew the institution he had so jealously defended. It has now become quite generally accepted, that rank, whether by brevet or otherwise, is but the degree of dignity conferred by a commission, arid that its attributes and privileges depend upon the laws, regulations, and orders which competent authority may make concerning it ; and among them, in the military service are command, pay, emoluments, uniform, etc. The distinction be- tween rank and its incidents is to be observed alike in brevet rank and in all other species of military rank. The general-in-chief of the army learned, in 1845, that doubts were entertained by officers — several of them of high rank — whether brevet 2d lieutenants were commissioned officers in tlie meaning of the law, and, at his suggestion, the following order on the subject was issued : — " War Department, March 30, 1845. " Under the Act of Congress of the 29th of April, 1812, relative to the Military Academy, etc., the President of the United States is authorized " when any cadet shall receive a regular degree from the Academical Staff after going through all the classes, he shall be considered among the candidates for a commission in any corps, according to the duties he may be judged competent to perform ; and in case there shall not, at the time, be a vacancy in such corps, he may be attached to it at the discretion of the President of the United States by brevet of the lowest grade as a supernumerary officer." Under the act the President is not required either to commission such graduate when there is a vacancy, or to attach him as a supernumerary officer by brevet of the lowest grade when there is no vacancy, but he may do so at his discretion, and having exercised that discretion, such grad uate, so commissioned and attached, becomes an officer of the lowest grade in the corps, and is entitled to all consideration as a commissioned officer. " W. L. MARCY. " By Order : " R. Jones, " Adjutant General." A memorandum of March, 1845, from the head-quarters of the army, on this subject, says : "It is said that the 65th and 66th articles of war speak of courts-martial as composed of ' commissioned officers,' and although brevets have been proved to be commissions, it has been 1 90 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS agreed that by sec. 4, act of April 29, 1812, any cadet who shall receive a regular degree from the academical staff only becomes a ' candidate for commission.' This is granted ; but the cadet is a '^^^(/zi/flfe for commission ' only from the point of graduation up to the receipt of his commission or brevet, for the President (though not compelled) has always given commissions, by brevet or otherwise, to the members of every graduating class, the ac- ceptance of which renders the recipients no longer candidates but already commissioned ofScers, in the sense of that act, the one containing the articles of war, and [of] every other act touching the army ; and as commissioned officers, the supernumeraries are as liable to every duty, and as much entitled to every right, as other 2d lieutenants of their respective corps." Hostilities with Mexico commenced in 1845. At that time, the number of general officers authorized by the existing mil- itary establishment was three, viz: one major-general and two brigadier-generals. Scott was the major-general and Gaines and Wool were the brigadier-generals.- It soon became neces- sary, however, to increase this number, and, to meet the exigency, an act was passed on the i8th of June, 1846, authorizing the President, by and with the consent of the Senate, to appoint an additional major-general and two additional brigadier-generals, with the proviso that, at the termination of the war with Mexico, the number of general officers should be reduced to three, as provided for prior to its commencement. Colonel Zachary Taylor, of the 6th Infantry, who had been brevetted a brigadier-general for distinguished services in the Florida war, was appointed major-general, on the 29th of June, 1846, agreeably to the provisions of the act just mentioned — a fitting reward for his then recent brilliant services at Palo Alto and Resaca de la Palma ; and Colonels Twiggs and Kearney, of the Dragoons, were appointed the additional brigadier-generals. Another addition to the number of general officers was made by the act of March 3, 1847, which authorized the President to appoint two additional major-generals and not to exceed three additional brigadier-generals, who were to be discharged at the close of the war. Under this latter act Gideon J. Pillow and John Anthony Quit- man, who were then in service as brigadier-generals of volun- teers, raised under the act of May 13, 1846, hereafter referred to, were appointed major-generals in the army, and Franklin Pierce, who entered the army from civil life as a colonel of Infantry, on the i8th of February, 1847, and George Cadwalader, were ap- pointed brigadier-generals. The army was largely increased, and to encourage the rank an^i OF BREVETS. I9I file, it was enacted on the 3d of March, 1847, that "when any non-commissioned officer shall distinguish himself or may have distinguished himself, in the service, the President of the United States shall be and is hereby, authorized, on the recommendation of the commanding officer of the regiment to which such non- commissioned officer belongs, to attach hiin, by brevet of the lowest grade of rank, with the usual pay and emoluments of such grade, to any corps of the army ; provided that there shall not be more than one so attached to any one company at the same time : and when any private soldier shall so distinguish himself, the President may, in like manner, grant him a certificate of merit which shall entitle him to additional pay at the rate of two dollars per month." The provisions of this act were further increased and extended by the act of August 4, 1854. Attorney-General Toucey gave an opinion on the 4th of Sep- tember, 1848, that the brevet commissions issued by the President under this act were valid, though the persons upon whom they were bestowed were not non-commissioned officers at the date of their bestowal ; that the act invested the President with au- thority to issue such brevets as a reward for the distinguished services of non-commissioned officers, rendered in that capacit)', upon certain evidence that they had thus served, whether they should retain the same rank when the reward should be bestowed, or should have been transferred elsewhere to act in an humbler capacity. At the close of the war, in 1848, the President bestowed brevets with great liberality. Brigadier-Generals Twiggs and Kearney, appointed under the act of June 18, 1846, were brevetted major- generals. Taylor, who was a major-general and could go no higher, soon afterwards rode on his laurels straight into the Pres- idential chair. Of the additional general officers appointed under the act of March 3, 1847, Quitman and Cadwalader received the brevets of major-general, that of the former dating from September 23, 1846, when he was a brigadier-general of volunteers, and that of the latter from September 13, 1847. So liberally were the brevets bestowed,, that, of 964 officers re- maining in service after the termination of the war, no less than 224 held brevets higher than their commissions in regiments and corps, and soon the officers of the army began to consider that the liberality had degenerated into an abuse, and a desire was expressed by them that the distinction should be conferred only on the recommendation of a board of officers high in rank. Their desire, however, was never fulfilled. Reference has already been made to officers of volunteers in 197 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS the service of the United States. Soon after the commencement of the war, it was deemed necessary to call out the militia and to raise a volunteer force. An act was accordingly passed on the 13th of May, 1846, authorizing the President to employ the mili- tia, and to call for 50,000 volunteers, and on the 26th of June, 1846, an act was passed, authorizing him to appoint, by and with the consent of the Senate, such number of major-generals and briga- dier-generals (of volunteers) as the organization of the volunteer forces into brigades and divisions might render necessary. Under this act, four major-generals and seven brigadier-generals appear to have been appointed, two of whom (Pillow and Quitman) were, as has already been stated, appointed general officers in the regular army. There was, at this period, no law authorizing the bestowal of brevets on officers of the volunteer forces, but, notwithstanding that fact, there appear to have been at least two cases where they were so bestowed, viz. : the cases of brigadier-generals Joseph Lane and James Shields. Lane was appointed, from civil life, colonel of Indiana volunteers, on the 2Sth of June, 1846, a briga- dier-general of volunteers, on the ist of July, 1846, and was brevet- ted a major-general in the army, to date from October 9th, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct in the battle of Humantla. He was disbanded on the 20th of July, 1848. Shields was ap- pointed, from civil life also, a brigadier-general of volunteers, on the lit of July, 1846, and was brevetted a major-general in the army, to date from April 18, 1847, ^o'' gallant and meritorious conduct in the battle of Cerro Gordo. He was disbanded on the 20th of July, 1848. Neither Lane nor Shields ever appear to have held commissions in the regular array, except those by brevet, as just stated. Not long after the close of the war, the question of the rights and privileges of officers holding brevet commissions seems to have been brought to the special attention of the executive and legislative branches of the government. On the 26th of June, 1850, Mr. Crawford, secretary of war, made the following report on the subject to the chairman of the' committee on military af- fairs, House of Representatives : — " War Department, " Washington, June 26, 1850. " Hon. A. Burt, "Chairman of the Committee on Military Affairs, House of Representatives : "Sir: — Referring to the verbal request made by you, I beg leave to submit my views on brevet rank and pay in thear my, in explanation of that part of the annual report from this depart- OF BREVETS. 193 ment, accompanying the President's message to Congress whicli refers to this subject. " The existing laws on brevet rank and command are the 6ist and 62d articles of war ; and on brevet pay, the law of April 16, 1818, in connection with these articles of war. " After many years of controversy in the army, the construc- tion of the articles of war in this matter has been settled. The last authoritative exposition of the article, upon the recommenda- tion of the committee on military affairs in the Senate, to whom the subject had come on a memorial from the army at Corpus Christi, in 1846, was made by President Polk, by re-publishing the orders and decisions of President Jackson, and revoking and abrogating all other orders on the subject. "This construction of the 6ist article now determines that brevet rank, by direct operation of law, can take effect only on courts-martial and detachments composed of different corps, that detachment means, not any mixed command, but a force de- tached from the main body for a temporary service, and that bre- vet rank does never take effect in the regiment, troop or company to which the brevet officer belongs. " And by the construction of the 62d article, it is determined that in all permanent and organized commands in the array (ex- cepting the temporary detachments referred to, in the 61 st article,) brevet rank does not take effect, but the command is in the sen- ior officer of the line ; unless and where different corps join, the President shall otherwise specially direct in the particular case, which exception is construed to authorize the President to con- fer the special comrhand of such mixed corps upon a brevet or staff officer according to his brevet rank or staff rank. "This restriction on the exercise of brevet rank has removed a portion of the inconveniences which necessarily resulted from the existence and conflict of different ranks held at the same time by many officers. But the evils of such a system still appear in the occasions and to the extent to which brevet rank is still allowed to operate. " In regard to brevet rank and command, I think that the con- struction now given to the a' tide of war is co rect ; but much doubt still exists on the law of 1818 in regard to brevet pay. "The law of i8t8 prohibits brevet pay in all cases, except where the officer is on duty, and has a command according to his brevet rank. And the 6ist article of war is equally precise in directing that the brevet officer shall not do duty, or take rank, according to his brevet, in his regiment, troop or company. These laws are pari materia and to be construed together. They use nearly the same terms and in the same sense. It would seem, therefore, 194 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS quite clear that these laws very distinctly forbid brevet pay in the regiment, troop or company. " But such has not been the construction. On the 8th May, 1818, so soon following the law of April 16, 1818, a regulation, fixing brevet pay, was published from the War Department, as follows: [May 8, 1818. Brevet officers shall receive the pay and emoluments of their brevet commissions when they exercise com- mand equal to their brevet rank ; for example, a brevet captain must command a company ; a brevet major and a brevet lieutenant- colonel, a battalion ; a brevet colonel, a regiment; a brevet brig- adier-general, a brigade ; a brevet major-general, a division.] " Standing alone, without reference to the law of 18 18, or any other regulation, this regulation would be read to allow brevet pay to every brevet captain who should command a company, to every brevet major who should command a battalion, &c., &c., and no distinction would be drawn in regard to command in or out of the regiment, &c. It is true that in another part of the same book of regulations was a regulation in regard to brevet rank, which declared ' that brevet rank gives no command, except on detach- ment, and which defined detachment to extend to temporary service only, and not to the regular command of departments, or permanent posts and garrisons.' Still, in determining the question of pay, the regulation in regard to pay only was consulted, and brevet pay came to be allowed whenever the command corre- sponded to the grade of the brevet, whether the brevet rank was allowed to operate or not ; that is to say, whether the command was in the body of an unmixed regiment or otherwise. " After such a lapse of time, it is not very easy now to ascertain whether the war department at that day intended the construction which was practically put on the regulations ; whether it was intended to construe the regulation in regard to pay without refer- ence to the regulation in regard to rank, or to construe the law of 1818 without reference to the articles of war. But the practice here stated has resulted, and brevet pay has been allowed in the regiments equally as on detachments. " In 1829, the subject of brevet pay was referred to the attorney- general by the President. In the opinion then given, Mr. Berrien considered that the law of 18 18 did not allow brevet pay in any case where, by the articles of war, the operation of brevet rank was excluded, and that, if the army regulations allowed brevet pay in the officer's own regiment, troop or company, these regula- tions were in opposition to law. This opinion appears to have produced no change in the practice which prevailed in the allow- ance of brevet pay. " Although, if it were a new question, I should now entertain OF BREVETS. 195 no doubt as to the construction of the law of iSi8, and should have no difificulty in concludiag that brevet pay cannot, by that law and the articles of war, be allowed in the regiment, troop or company, to which the brevet officer fcelongs, still, I have not felt called upon to reverse, by the mere action of this department, what may claim to have been the contemporaneous interpretation of the law, and what has certainly been the practice under it from that time to the present, the more especially as it appears that the attention of the President was called, by the opinion of the attorney-general, in 1829, to the practice, under the regulation, apparently at variance with the law, and the same practice was nevertheless still continued, and has been to this time. I now lay the question before the appropriate committee of Congress, in view of the enforcement of the existing law ,by further legislative action, if you should agree with me in the opinion which I enter- tain as to what the law now is and what it ought to be. " It is in place here to advert to another practice which has existed at intervals in regard to brevet pay. Officers of the staff corps have received brevet pay for commands assimilated to their brevet grades. Mr. Taney was of opinion, in 1832, as Mr. Berrien had been, in 1829, that the ''command' contemplated by the law of 1818, to which brevet pay is restricted, must be the military command of troops. This would confine the benefits of brevet pay to officers of the line, at least, to commands in the line. Subsequently, however, to Mr. Taney's opinion, the practice again obtained of allowing, in certain cases, brevet pay in the staff corps ; when, at length, the rule, as given in the opinions above cited, was revived by Mr. Marcy, in the latter part of his administration of the war department ; and so I found the rule and have continued it, and now no brevet pay is allowed to officers in the engineers, topographical engineers, ordnance or in any sta £f department. Nor does it appear to me necessary to rest thi s decision upon a strict or narrow interpretation of the word ''command' in the act of 1818, because staff officers are excluded from brevet pay while serving in their particular corps in like manner as from the exercise of their brevet rank, and are to do duty, take rank, and receive pay according to the commissions by which they are mustered. " But even if the allowance of brevet pay were in all cases strictly confined, with the operation of brevet rank, to actual command on detachments of mixed corps or on assignments by the President, there would yet remain very grave objections to any systein which introduces, or tends to introduce, any confusion or conflict of rank in the military service, by conferring different ranks, each to operate according to circumstances, on the same 196 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS officer. I remain, therefore, of the opinion expressed in my annual report, that brevet rank should not be allowed to operate in any case, directly by law, to confer rank, command, or pay, and only under a provision similar to the construction now placed on the 62d article of war, by which the President is allowed, by a special direction in the particular case, to assign a brevet officer to his rank. This discretion would be rarely exercised, and only on occasions of sufficient importance to the public service. It would enable the government, for high military commands, where seniority by line commission might not afford a suitable com- mander, to select from among the officers who had earned the distinction which the brevet supposes, and to give effect to brevet rank in such case. The provision of law which now limits brevet pay to an actual command equivalent to the rank, might still be applied, and would sufficiently guard against the inducements to seek or confer such rank in reference to pay only. " I cannot see any reason to continue the existing operation of brevet rank on detachments, or why the senior and more experi- enced officer, who holds rank and command in his regiment and in all permanent arrangements of the troops, whether in marches, guards or quarters, posts or garrisons, shall, on detachments, give place, and be subjected, to his junior. I do not see that the law offers a single compensating advantage for the many mischiefs which it causes. It confounds military rank, and weakens its effect ajid authority, by alternating the command, and occasionally subjecting the senior officer to the command of his junior. In thus interchanging the command among junior and senior officers, it shifts the responsibility for the execution of military orders, the care and government of the troops, and the preservation of the public property. It produces discontents and controversies, and has, in our army, on several critical occasions, threatened serious consequences. " But whatever may be the judgment of Congress as to the continuation of the present brevet law, there is one part of it which now needs legislative interpretation ; to determine whether the officer who has received different grades of brevet appointment continues to retain and hold them all at once ; so that he may elect, or others may elect for him, which shall be operative. In the ordinary commission where an officer is promoted to a higher, he is considered to be removed from the lower, which he held at his promotion, and which another fills in his stead. And he can derive no advantage from claiming to retain the lower, as he takes all the benefits of rank, command and pay, which attach to his promotion. But in brevet commissions it appears to be con- sidered that the lower is not merged in the higher, in respect of OF BREVETS. I 97 pay at least, however it may be in respect to rank. The brevet officer can get no pay except he hold the actual equivalent com- mand. A captain of the line may have received three brevets. He could hardly hold the command of a colonel which would con- fer the pay of that grade. But he may have a command equal to that of a major ; and then, if his brevet of major is available, he may receive the pay. Brevet officers, therefore, claim, in com- mands which confer pay, the exercise of their inferior brevets. But the brevet law seems to contemplate only one brevet rank. It defines when the brevet rank shall take effect. It was never doubted that on a court-martial the brevet officer has one, and but one, brevet rank, that he must take his place accordingly, and that he cannot choose among his brevets which to exercise. And in the absence of any provision of law to the contrary, the promo- tion by brevet must follow the analogies and principles of promo- tion by ordinary commission. It may appear to Congress that there is an equitable distinction between these cases, and that there ought to be a legal ; that, as in the ordinary promotion, the officer never suffers loss of pay, so he ought not, by any consequence of brevet promotion. In this case, however, a provision by law would be necessary to exclude the obvious legal conclusion to the contrary. " I have the honor to be, " Very respectfully, " Your obedient servant, "GEO. W. CRAWFORD, " Secretary of War." No legislation was effected by this report, the subject being left to executive action. In November, 1850, the President con- vened a Board of officers (of which General Scott was the Pres- ident), to consider the subject of rank generally, including brevet rank. The Board, on the 27th of November, 1850, submitted the following report : — Washington, November 27th, 1850. To the Hon. C. M. Conrad, Secretary of War, Sir : — The undersigned officers of the army, constituted by the Presi- dent of the United States a board to consider and report upon a resolution that passed the House of Representatives, July 18, 1850, touching rank and command within the army and within the navy, and the order of precedency between the officers of the two arras of the national defence, beg leave, on so much of the igS HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS resolution as relates exclusively to the army, to offer through you this separate report. The parts of the resolution here to be separately considered are all of a kindred nature, and four in number : — 1 . " The gradations of rank for the officers and non-commis- sioned officers of the military staff and the line of the army. 2. " The order of succession to command among the officers and non-commissioned officers of the array. 3. " The order of precedence between the officers of the non- military staff of the army and the officers of the army having staff or lineal rank, etc. 4 " The extent to which officers and non-commissioned officers of the staff in the army shall be subject to the command of offi- cers and non-commissioned officers of the line of the array." It is to be regretted that all these points have not been theo- retically or at least practically, settled with us, as they had been settled, a century before American Independence, in the British service, from which service Congress early borrowed all our titles and descriptions of rank, and at the same time every written rule for the government of rank. But in England, as in the United States, there is no written law solving, in express terms, the rights and duties, except very partially, of regimental rank, brevet rank, oir staff rank, toward each other ; nor has the code of either country any table or scale of rank, to show the regular subordina- tion of titles or grades. Indeed the articles of war in the two countries (almost identical), on the subject of rank, would have been almost unintelligible but for the military common law, viz. : " the custom of war in like cases," applied as a rule of construe - tion or explanation to those articles. This " custom " being in all cases strictly followed in the British army, uniformity of practice therein has been the result. Not so in our service. With substantially the same articles of war, adopted by Congress, September 30, 1776, and again re-enacted April 10, r8o6, it can- not be denied that doubts and difficulties have, in the last thirty odd years, arisen with us on every head of rank and command nov/ under consideration. The resolution of the House of Representatives, before the Board, is the proof and reflection of the fact. Whether these doubts and difficulties have arisen in conse- quence of slight differences of organization between our army and that of Great Britain, or from other causes hitherto in opera- tion among us, the board does not feel called upon to express an opinion, but proceeds to offer such modifications of the laws on this subject as it earnestly hopes, if adopted, may in future pre- vent contrariety of construction and practice. OF BREVETS. 199' To accomplish this important object, the board, after much reflection, submits for tlie approbation of the President and Congress the following : — SECTIONS PROPOSED FOR AN ACT OF CONGRESS. 1. Be it enacted, etc.. That under the President as " commander- in-chief of the army and navy of the United States," the follow- ing, until otherwise provided by law, shall be the titles and grades of army rank, or rank in the line of the army ; number one being the highest rank and each succeeding number higher in rank and command than the following number, viz. : — i, major-general ; 2, brigadier-general ; 3, colonel ; 4, lieutenant-colonel ; 5, major; 6, captain ; 7, first lieutenant ; 8, second lieutenant ; 9, cadet ; 10, ordnance sergeant; 11, sergeant-major; 12, quartermaster sergeant; 13, principal musician; 14, orderly or first sergeant; 15, sergeant; and 16, corporal, who shall be also entitled to command all private soldiers, including private musicians, artifi- cers and the like; s.r\A provided, that all persons subject to the rules and articles for the government of the army of the United States, and not commissioned, shall be subordinate to any com- missioned officer in the army, though of the civil staff or without array rank. 2. £e it further enacted. That rank, as laid down and graduated in the foregoing section, shall be considered, in respect to com- mand, alike valid and effective, whether in the army, marine corps, or militia, and whether by ordinary commission, brevet commission, or staff commission, and whether in regiments, corps, or departments of the staff, other than the medical and pay departments, observing differences in grades, and seniority within the same grade ; and with the further restrictions provided in sections three and four of this act, and in article ninety-eight, section one, of an act entitled " an act for establishing rules and articles for the government of the armies of the United States," approved April 10, i?>o6,— provided, that the President of the United States, when in his opinion it may be necessary or proper, specially exempt any officer, military department or station, from such command. 3. And be it further enacted. That officers having brevet com- missions or staff commissions of a grade or grades higher than those in the regiment, corps, troop, or company, to which such officers belong, shall do duty and take rank, when serving in their own regi- ments, corps, troop, or company, or in courts, detachments, boards and councils, which shall be composed only of their own corps, according to the commissions by which they are mustered in 200 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS said corps. And provided also, that no brevet or staff officer shall assume the command of troops by virtue of such commis- sion, unless assigned thereto by the President of the United States or a general officer commanding in the field ; except, that when different corps join or do duty together, a brevet or staff officer, on duty with the same, may assume the command in cases where he would otherwise fall under the orders of an officer of inferior army rank belonging to another regiment or corps. 4. And be it further enacted. That accidental vacancies in the command of divisions, brigades, regiments, battalions, com- panies, detachinents, departments, or posts, shall, under the restrictions provided in the foregoing section, devolve on the officer or non-commissioned officer next in rank in each particular command, and so continue with him until the vacancy shall be supplied by regular promotion, appointment or detail ; but in the mean time the President of the United States, or a general officer commanding in the field, may assign to the vacant command any staff, brevet or other officer, provided, that the assigned officer may not supersede an actual commander of equal or supe- rior grade, except at the request or by the consent, of the latter. 5. And be it further enacted. That the rank conferred by section eight, of the act approved February 11, 1847, entitled "an act to raise for a limited time an additional military force, and for other purposes," upon the officers of the medical department, and by section thirteen of an act entitled " an act making provision for an additional number of general officers, and for other purposes," approved March 3, 1847, upon officers of the pay department, shall entitle the officers holding such rank to choice of quarters, and to precedence according to rank on courts, boards and and councils, and to the military honors of their rank ; and when they chance to be at a post, or with a detachment, commanded by a junior officer, they shall not absent themselves from the post or detachment, except in urgent cases, and then not without notifying the commanding officer, though of inferior rank, of their intention so to do. 6. And be it further enacted. That the non-military staff of the army shall, in respect to precedence and the choice of quarters, be classed as follows : — chaplains, being commissioned officers, with majors ; chaplains and schoolmasters of posts, and also military storekeepers, with captains. 7. And be it further enacted. That all vacancies occurring in the adjutant-general's, inspector-general's, quartermaster-gener- al's, subsistence and pay departments, shall be filled by selection from the whole axmy,— provided, that no officer shall be advanced more than one grade by such selection. OF BREVETS. 20I 8. And he it further enacted^Thiit all commissions conferring rank which shall be vacated by disbandment, resign ition or otherwise, shall cease to be effective for all purposes in the array, —provided, that the question of priority between officers of the same grade and date may be determined by reference to such former commissions. 9. And be it further enacted, That the following parts or pro- visions of acts be, and the same are hereby repealed, viz. : — articles sixty-one, sixty-two, and sixty-three, section first, of the act entitled " an act for the government of the armies of the United States," approved April 10, 1806 ; also, but without prejudice to the rank of the present officers of the medical and pay departments, so much of the two acts recited in section five -of this act as gives qualified army rank to medical officers and paymasters ; and likewise, but without prejudice to the rank of the present judge-advocate for the army, so much of section four of the act entitled " an act for the increase of the medical staff and for an additional number of chaplains of the army of the United States," approved March "2, 1849, as might give to a suc- cessor of the said judge-advocate the army rank of brevet major ; provided, that nothing contained in this section shall be so con- strued as to affect the pay and emoluments now authorized by law to such officers. We have the honor to remain, Sir, with high respect. Your most obedient servants, WiNFiELD Scott, Major-Genl., and President of the Board. Thos. S. Jesup, Bvt. Maj.-Genl. John E. Wool, Maj.-Genl. by brevet. J. B. Crane, Col. ist Regt. Arty. E. A. Hitchcock, Lt.-Col. 3d Inf., Bvt. Col. Benj. F. Larned, Dep. P. M. G. T. S. Mower, Surg. U. S. A. This did not result in any legislation, and the vexed question was left to stand where it had stood before the report of the board was made. In 1851 the authority of brevet rank was still further extended, as will be seen from the following general order, issued on the i8th of January of that year : — 202 history and legal effects General Orders. > War Department, No. 4. I Adjutant-General's Office, Washington, January 18, igSi- Major P. St. George Cooke, of the 2d Regiment of Dragoons, lieutenant-colonel by brevet, detailed to serve as a member of the military board ordered to assemble in this city, Wednesday, the 15th instant, pursuant to "General Orders," No. 48, 1850, having made objection in writing to the order of precedence observed in the arrangement of the names of the officers com- posing the said military board, and the objection having been duly weighed and considered the following is the decision thereon : War Department, January 15, 1851. The question presented by Brevet Lieut.-Colonel Cooke's appeal, was carefully considered in organizing the board which was recently convened to consult on rank in the army, and rela- tive rank between officers of the army and navy. The view then taken on the subject was this : — "The 6ist article gives effect to brevet rank on " courts martial and on detachments composed of different corps." A military board is, perhaps, strictly speaking, neither a court martial nor a detachment, but it is strikingly analogous to both ; and it is a well settled principle that where the law has omitted, as in this instance, to provide for a particular case, the rule laid down for analogous cases will be applied to it. The officers on that board having brevet rank were accordingly directed to take precedence according to that rank. After again maturely examining the question, that decision is considered correct and will be adhered to in the organization of all military boards. " C. M. CONRAD. " Secretary of War." The foregoing decision is published for the instruction and guidance of the commissioned officers of the army. By Order, R. JONES, Adjutant-General. The subject was again considered in 1855, when the general order of January i8th, 185 1, was revoked, as will be seen from the following synopsis of a " protest " made by Captain W. S. Ketchum, and the decision of the secretary of war thereon : — " Brevet Lieutenant-Colonel Hoffman, commanding Fort Lara- mie, having ordered a council of administration, composed of two OF BREVETS. 303 officers of the 6th infantry and one of the 9th, and ranged the members thereon according' to their brevets, Captain W. S. Ketchum, the senior of the three by ordinary or regimental com- mission, denies that brevet rank is operative in such a case, and claims that he is rightfully the president of the council. Colonel Hoffman grounds his procedure on Mr. Secretary Con- rad's opinion of January 15th, 1851, published in general orders, No. 4, of that year, prior to the issuing of which order, breves rank, where officers only came together, was restricted to courtt martial and (under Mr. Secretary Poinsett's regulation of October 31st, 1838) courts of inquiry, when composed of officers of different regiments or corps. " Lieutenant-Colonel Hoffman, referring to the fact that garri- son courts martial can only be ordered at posts where there are different corps, asks ' if the officers of the court happen to be of the same regiment, does brevet rank take effect or not ?' This inquiry seems to be very distinctly answered in the negative by the 6ist article of war. " Respectfully submitted to the secretary of war. "S. COOPER, " Adjutant-General." Decision of the secretary of war on the above : " In the case of the Post Council of Administration assembled at Fort Laramie, it is held that brevet rank could not take effect, the cases specified in the act of April loth, 1806 (rules and articles of war), being those of courts martial and detachments composed of different corps, and the accidental junction of different corps of the army serving temporarily together but not constituting an organized corps. A detail of officers, to constitute a board, or council of administration, to inspect property, or to attend to the fiscal affairs of a military post, cannot be considered as a court martial, or as a detachment from the post at which the officers were serving. General order, No. 4, 1851, will be rescinded. "JEFFN. DAVIS, " Secretary of War." War Department, Oct. loth, 1855. A new edition of army regulations was issued in 1857, dated January ist, in which the article concerning brevet rank is as follows : 204 history and legal efffxts Article ii. Rank and Command. 5. * * * In case of equality of rank, by virtue of a brevet commission, reference is had to commissions not brevet. 8. An officer not having orders from competent authority cannot put himself on duty by virtue of his commission alone. 9. Brevet rank takes effect only in the following cases : ist, by special assignment of the President in commands composed of different corps ; 2d, on courts-martial or detachments composed of different corps. Troops are on detachment only when sent out temporarily to perform a special service. II. In regularly constituted commands, as garrisons, posts, departments ; companies, battalions, regiments ; corps, brigades, divisions, army corps, or the army itself; brevet rank cannot be exercised except by special assignment." The general-in-chief of the army, Scott, on the 28th of March, , 1857, filed objections to these regulations in the following re- marks : — REMARKS. " On the book called General Regulations of the Army, purport- ing on the second page (under the printed signature of the secre- tary of war), to have received the approval of the President of the U. S., January ist, 1857. 1. The book is posthumous, not having been published until after the approvers were officially defunct, that is to say, replaced by a new President and a new secretary of war. At least, I know it was not received at the head-quarters of the army (New York), till the 7th of March, 1857. 2. The book is not only spurious, for the reasons stated, but a most extraordinary number of copies (perhaps five times the usual number) were printed, as if to fasten, for the longest possible time, the peculiar and offensive views of the late secretary upon the army, by making the publication (on account of cost) more difficult to suppress with a view to a new and corrected edition. 3. The constitution gives Congress (not the President) power to make rules for the government of the land forces, which power has been executed (for the time being) in what are usually called OF BREVETS. 205 the rules and articles of war. The Executive cannot alter or change one of these ; but it is admitted that he may make rules or standing orders, strictly in subordination to the letter and spirit of the legislative code. The loth and nth paragraphs of the new book violate this principle. They lay a restriction on brevet irank (not in common with any other rank) over and above the guarded restrictions provided in the 6ist article of war ; and hence those paragraphs are void. In other words (and I am obliged, in so plain a case, to use a truism), rank is rank ; that is, all army rank, created by law, is equally valid, except in cases excepted by the law. The 6ist, 63d and 98th of the rules and articles of war contain every exception or restriction, in respect to every sort of army rank, to be found in our statutes at large. The obnoxious paragraphs in question bring up the rear, with a ven- geance, and by the doctrine of 'special assignment,' superadded to the burden of congressional restrictions, nearly annihilate brevet rank, and render it a mere object of Executive favor or dis- pleasure. I need scarcely add that, in this instance, I am a disinterested commentator ; for my rank, by brevet, cannot be affected by this interpolation and usurpation upon law. Nevertheless, I trust the paragraphs may be expurgated, and for the additional reasons : the 10th contains a false description of the word 'detachment ;' and the nth falsely places 'garrisons, posts, departments/ also 'brigades, divisions, army corps, or the army itself,' in respect to brevet rank, on the same footing, a 'regiment,' independent ' troop,' or ' company,' in which, only, officers are ordinarily ' mustered.' There is a great deal of learning connected with these ques- tions—all to the same effect — which I forbear to quote in this place, preferring to rest my conclusions on the plain common sense views I have taken above. 4. The same doctrine of special assignment by the President is reproduced, in respect to pay, in paragraph 1176, of the same book, against law. See the 'preceding paragraph and the 6ist article of war. 5. See paragraphs 1283 and 1284, of the same book, 'lieuten- ants to take charge of the recruiting parties,' ' the adjutant- general will detail,' etc., etc. Here again the commanding general is ignored ; and regimental captains are indefinitely banished from civil life. They are in future not to be detailed for recruit- ing purposes. No doubt their presence with companies is im- portant ; but the extreme doctrine of this paragraph degrades it to a mere crotchet. , 6. There are many other arbitrary and capricious changes in 2o6 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS the new book, some of which affect, very seriously, particular departments of the general staff ; but as they will, it is presumed, be pointed out by the chiefs of those departments respectively, I will here conclude my remarks on the new book, by noticing a very remarkable omission, evidently designed to affect my office and authority in the army." ^^ EXTRACT FROM THE ARMY REGULATIONS OF 1847. Article X. The Commander of the Army. 48. . . . The military establishment is placed under the orders of the major-general commanding-in-chief, in all that regards its discipline and military control. Its fiscal arrangements prop- erly belong to the administrative departments of the staff, and to the treasury department, under the direction of the secretary of war. 49. . . . The general will watch over the economy of the service, in all that relates to the expenditure of money, supply of arms, ordnance and ordnance-stores, clothing, equipments, camp- equipage, medical and hospital stores, barracks, quarters, trans- portation, fortifications, military academy, pay and subsistence, — in short, every thing which enters into the expenses of the mili- tary establishment, whether personal or national. He will also see that the estimates for the military service are based upon proper data, and made for the objects contemplated by law, and neces- sary to the due support and useful employment of the army. In carrying into effect these important duties, he will call to his counsel and assistance the staff, and those officers proper in his opinion to be employed in verifying and inspecting all the objects which may require attention. The rules and regulations estab- lished for the government of the army, and the laws relating to the military establishment, are the guides to the commanding general in the performance of his duties. " The whole of the foregoing article, drawn up with care under the eye of Mr. Secretary Marcy, and approved by President Polk, while I was absent in Mexico, has been dropped from the new book ! ! ! # * * * * * * "WINFIELD SCOTT. " Head-quarters of the Army, ), March 28, 1857." | OF BREVETS. 20/ The views of the general-in-chief, however, produced no change in the code, and the paragraplis concerning brevet rank appeared, without alteration, in the editions of the regulations issued in 1861 and 1863. The secretary of war replied to General Scott's remarks as follows : — " War Department, "Washington, 25 Sept., 1857. " Sir : — I have carefully examined the articles of the army regulations now in force under orders from the President of the United States, through the war department, dated January ist, 1857, to which you call my attention. "I think the articles on rank and command by virtue of brevet commissions stand now as they have stood since 1829, a long period of time ; so long that I do not feel at liberty to alter them. If it were a new question, I should incline to your construction of the articles of war. But the repeat- ed decisions of the Executive Department of the Government construing the law uniformly in one way, acquiesced in by the legislature whenever brought to their attention, must now be taken to settle the law, and in this, as in a matter of public ad- ministration, and not of private right, the doctrine is especially applicable, that it is more important to settle the rule than to consider whether it was well declared in the first instance." "The regulations for brevet pay (pars. 1175, 1176) are in ac- cordance with the well considered opinion of the attorney-gener- al of the United States in 1829. This is, in my opinion; the true construction of the law, and is accurately expressed in the terms of the law. " The failure to insert in the new regulations a definition of the duties and authority pertaining to the office of commander-in- chief of the army, which was contained in the old regulations, I am satisfied, does not, in any degree, take from it any power, authority, honor or command conferred upon that high office by law. Definitions are always difficult, sometimes impossible. The definitions in the old regulations, attempting to define the duties of the principal officers of the army, are not, in my judg- ment, satisfactory ; and I think the new regulations wisely fol- low the example set by those which you prepared in 1825, in which no definitions were attempted. *-* * * * * * " With the highest regard and esteem, " Very truly, your obedient servant. "J. B. FLOYD, " Secretary of War." 208 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS. During the two or three years following the Mexican War the distinguished services in that contest were generally and liberally rewarded by brevet promotion. Scott, the general-in-chief, holding the highest grade then in existence in our service, — that of major-general, — and holding that grade also by brevet dating from July 25, 1814, could receive no additional brevet without further legislation. On the 15th of February, 1855, a joint resolution, as follows, was passed : — ■ " Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, that the grade of lieutenant-general be, and is hereby, revived in the army of the United States, in order that, when in the opinion of the President and Senate it shall be deemed proper to acknowledge eminent services of a major-general of the army in the late war with Mexico, in the mode already provided for a subordinate grade, the grade of lieutenant-general may be specially conferred by brevet, and by brevet only, to take rank from' the date of such services : Pro- vided, however, that when the said grade of lieutenant-general by brevet shall have once been filled, and have become vacant, this joint resolution shall thereafter expire and be of no effect." The resolution was manifestly for the promotion of General Scott, and he was, in accordance therewith, brevetted a lieutenant- general, to date from March 29, 1847. On the 8th of March, 1855, General Scott presented accounts for the difference of com- pensation between the grades of major-general and lieutenant- general for a period of about seven years, beginning with the date of his brevet and oimitting the time when he was not on duty. This claim was opposed by the secretary of war, Jefferson Davis, who at the prior date, when chairman of the military committee in the Senate, had opposed the resolution for General Scott's pro- motion. Mr. Davis held that "the purpose was for eminent ser- vices in the war with Mexico, to confer a complimentary distinc- tion, not to grant a pecuniary reward." A bitter and protracted correspondence between Mr. Davis and General Scott grew out of the subject. General Scott submitted the question to the following named eminent lawyers, Henry D. Gilpin, Reverdy Johnson, James W. Gerard, Hiram Ketchum, Ogden Hoffman, and George Wood; and the opinion of all was to the effect that the law entitled him to the compensation he sought. The claim was submitted to Attorney-General Gushing, who decided, August 24, 1855. that General Scott held "by lawful appointment and commission the office of lieutenant-general by brevet in the army of the United OF BREVETS. 209 States, and that he was entitled to the pay and emoluments of the office," under the act of May 28, 1798, "fixing the pay of the grade of lieutenant-general." On the 12th of October, 1855, the secretary of war laid the subject before the President of the United States, with an elaborate report, in which he says : " the attorney general has given an opinion differing from the views held by me. His reasoning does not carry convicti on to my mind, nor do I see clearly IwwJtJ-'^.-sonclifeJas'-src-nr'ofe^ppUed to-Li'ib-"^,a3e, ortrjg^'^HneFal doctrines advanced be conceded, without involviilgquestions detrimental to the service. I have, therefore, concluded to submit the case to you," etc. In a letter to the secretary, dated October 29, 1855, the President confirmed, substantially, the views of the attorney-general, and said : " Bre- vet Lieutenant-General Scott is entitled to the pay and allowances of his brevet rank since March 29, 1847, during such period of time in peace as he may have been on duty as commanding-gen- eral of the army, and at all times in the field with a command not less than eight regiments." The secretary of war endorsed the President's letter as follows : " To be filed in the war office, and a copy to be furnished to the paymaster-general. The opinion' of the department, as hereto- fore expressed, remains unchanged. See files of the office. (Signed) Jefferson Davis, Secretary of War." The joint resolution to appoint a lieutenant-general by brevet was of far greater value to General Scott than one would have been creating the grade of lieutenant-general. This, Mr. Davis did not fail to observe and point otit. In one of his letters to General Scott, he says : " Had the grade of lieutenant-general been revived, to be held by ordinary .commission, you could not, under any construction, have had back pay, for the pay of such commission was only from date of acceptaqce ; hence the advan- tage of the provision that it should be held by brevet only, an advantage which members of Congress could hardly appreciate, for few besides army officers would know that, by the construction given to the law regulating brevet pay, you might be allowed, by virtue of that brevet, for additional services, long before per- formed and paid for under another commission." To this. Gen- eral Scott replied : " True ; hence the advantage of holding it by brevet only. No doubt such was the patriotic liberality of Con- gress." The back pay accruing to General Scott from his promotion amounted to thirty-two thousand seven hundred and forty-six dollars and seventy-six cents. The brevet in this instance was certainly the " full " rank. 10* 210 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS Andrews and Johnston. On the Tith of February, 1847, ^" ^^t was passed authorizing ten regiments to "be raised for and during the war with Mexico. ' Major T. P. Andrews, paymaster, was appointed colonel, and Captain Joseph E. Johnston, topographical engineer, lieutenant- colonel, of one of these regiments, and several other officers were ^^^appoiTTt5a~TiT^triTOra;-i£ jjOjiAvons in them^ _0n^ entering the new regiments, all of these officers vacatea aisj,^ ^JSi'nons'm tile" old regiments and corps, and their places were filled by ordinary promotions. Several of them were brevetted for gallant services in the war, notably Colonel Andrews to the grade of brigadier- general, and Lieutenant-Colonel Johnston to the grade of colonel. When the war with Mexico closed, and the " ten regiments " were disbanded as required by the act creating them, these officers, if no saving act had been passed, would have ceased to be officers of the army, both by brevet and regimental commis- sion. But instead of permitting this, a law was made continuing them in the army, with the rank in their former regiments that they would have had if they had not left them. They still held their brevet rank in the army at large. The brevets were conferred upon these officers in exact conformity to law, for what they actually did in the higher grades in which the government had placed them. The nature and value of the services- rendered were set forth, in the commissions bestowed as a lawful, just, and proper reward for them. The department ruled, without a shadow of law for it, that these commissions should be taken away, and, in lieu of them, subordinate "ones should be given, based upon services which, it was assumed, the officers would have rendered, if they had served in the lower grades which they had once oc- cupied in other regiments and corps to which they were restored at the close of the war. In his letter of January 31, 1849, to the President, submitting the names of these officers, the secretary of war says : " It hav- ing been determined by the department that the brevet commis- sions, conferred on them while officers of the ten regiments, ceased to be effective when they ceased to be officers of those regiments by reason of the expiration of the term for which they were commissioned to serve in that corps, and as, by the act of CongreiS referred to, they received commissions in the regular army reaching back beyond the time when they performed ser- vices for which they were brevetted as officers of the ten regiments, it is respectfully recommended that they be promoted by brevet as follows," &c. Andrews and Johnston protested against being deprived of the OF BREVETS. 2 1 1 brevets they had already earned and received. Adjutant-Generil Jones, in resisting their protest, made the argument, and it was subsequently used by his successors, that the Senate had given its approval to the ruling of the war department, because, in con- firming the subordinate brevets, it had used the precise language used by the department in making the nominations given above in the letter from the secretary of war. It was quite natural for the Senate to confirm the lower brevets, as that was the only measure of justice it could contribute in the case. In adopting, for the confirmation, the precise language used in the nomination, the Senate followed a custom which is general, if not invariable. In fact it could not well have clone otherwise. It " consents," or not, to what the President pro- poses, and the way to give that consent in the most unquestion- able terms is to adopt the President's terms. But the " advice and consent '' of the Senate applies only to the proposed appoint- ment — not to the manner in which the vacancy was created, that being a matter in which the facts are not before the Senate, and over which it has no jurisdiction. If the President says, " I nom- inate Captain A. to be Major, vice Major B. dismissed," and the Senate uses this precise language in the confirmation, it cannot be said that the Senate has confirmed the justice and legality of Major B.'s dismissal. Yet, in an official letter to Colonel Johnston, dated March 24, 1849, the adjutant-general told him that, because the Senate in con- firming him for a subordinate brevet adopted the precise language in which he was nominated, the action of the war department, in depriving him of another and higher brevet, had been " confirmed by the senate in its executive session." Although the other offioers concerned dropped the subject. Colonel Johnston persistently urged his rights, and the following report shows how the case was regarded when brought up by him in 1859 :— Report on the claim {April 75, 185S) of Lieutenant-Colonel John- ston, 1st Cavalry, to the rank of brevet colonel. " This case is settled by the previous decisions. When Mr. Marcy was secretary of war, the department decided against this case, with other like cases, and that decision was confirmed by the Senate on the 2d of March, 1849. On the 13th of March, this case was again presented to the department by Colonel Johnston, and on the 24th, Secretary Crawford decided that the previous decision was '■final.' On the nth of July, 1855, Colonel Johnston presented it to Secretary Davis, who decided 2 12 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS that the case '■ had been settled by his predecessors and could not be opened.' A decision was also made by Secretary Davis, i8th Januar}', 1856, against Colonel Johnston's claim to the benefit of his/ormer commission of lieutenant-colonel of voltigeurs. "As the law (April 16, 1818) provides that no brevet com- missions shall be conferred without the consent of the Seriate, and as the Senate has confirmed the decision of the department against Colonel Johnston's claira to this brevet, it cannot now be conferred on him without their consent. " If the department desires now to consider whether the case ought again to be submitted to the Senate, the following are the facts in regard to it : " On the 19th of April, 1848, Colonel Johnston, then a lieutenant-colonel of the regiment of voltigeurs, raised by the act of February 11, 1847, to serve 'during the war with Mexico' was brevetted a colonel ^for gallant and meritorious conduct, to date from the 12th of April, 184J, when he was severely wounded under the enemy's works at Cerro Gordo, Mexico, whilst on recon- noitering duty.' This ' reconnoitering duty,' spoken of in the brevet, was performed in the commission he then held of captain of topographical engineers, and for the gallant service then ren- dered he was entitled, by the usage of service, to receive, and doubtless would have received, had he remained in that corps, a brevet of the next higher grade, that is to say, a brevet of major. But at the time of conferring the brevet he was a lieutenant- colonel in the temporary regiment of voltigeurs, and was advanced one grade on that commission, which expired at the end of the war, and with it the brevet founded on it, as the government then decided in this case, and the other cases similar to it. The principle of these decisions will be found in an opinion of the attorney-general, Mr. Wirt, August, 1821. At the end of the war, however, the act of July 19, 1848, was passed, which pro- vided that all the officers of the old army who had taken com- ' missions in the temporary regiments should be restored to their old corps, and have the benefit of any promotion in them, to which they would have succeeded, if they had remained in them. The same liberal principle, though there was no provision in the law for it, was extended to them in regard to brevet commissions, which were conferred on them for their war services, as if they liad in fact retained throughout the war their old regimental com- missions. Two brevets, as his gallant services well deserved, were thus conferred on Colonel Johnston, then a captain of topographical engineers — one of major for Cerro Gordo, and one of lieutenant-colonel for Chapultepec. " Would it be equitable to give these officers the double benefit of restoring; their commissions in the old armv. and of eivino' OF BREVETS. 213 them rank in it by brevet according to their brevets founded on their temporary commissions ? It cannot be done without the con- sent of the Senate ; and is it lil^ely the Senate will consent to it ? If it is done in Colonel Johnston's case, it must be done in the other cases. Captains Walker, ist Cavalry, and Tracy, loth In- fantry, to be captains ; Captain Archer, gth Infantry, to be major ; Major Woods, pay department, to be lieutenant-colonel ; and Lieutenant-Colonel Andrews, same department, to be brigadier- general, according to their dates of respective brevets in the Mexicaii war. " I would remark, also, as proof of the temporary character of these brevets, that they were conferred, in like manner,_orL,tlae - officers of volunteers; for...example, -Brigadier-Generals Joseph Lane, John A. Quitman, and James Shields, of the Volunteers, had brevets of major-general in the army. " During the war of 1812, certain officers of the line were ap- pointed in staff departments with increased rank by b7'evet, at the same time retaining their line commissions, agreeably to the act of March 3, 1813. After the reduction of the army in 1815, when these staff appointments were abrogated, these officers returned to their former positions in the line ; and it was claimed that they carried with them the brevets which attached to their ap- pointments in the staff. Although this claim was often urged, it was never recognized by the department, nor was such brevet rank exercised after the reduction of 1815. " S. COOPER, A. G. Office, Apr. 1859. " Adjutant-General." There is an oversight in the last paragraph of the foregoing report which is the foundation of serious misapprehension concern- ing the stability of brevet rank. It has already been pointed out in the chapter on staff brevets. It consists in treating brevets conferred, under the act of 1812, for distinguished services, in the same manner as the brevet rank of staff officers conferred under the act of 1813. Tliey were entirely different. The brevet rank in the latter was staff rank. The staff office conferred the brevet rank. The officer was nominated and confirmed, to the one office of assistant adjutant-general, for example, with the brevet of captain. It followed from this that the two parts of the one office fell together. The breVet was in this case " based " upon the staff office, and ceased when the office ceased. But an entirely different state of facts existed in relation to brevets under the act of 1812. There, the brevet conferred an additional and distinct office, the only condition being that this second office should be bestowed upon an officer of the army, and for gallant conduct or meritorious services. To ingraft the limitations and conditions of 214 HISTORY AND, LEGAL EFFECTS the staff brevets upon the servitce brevets, as the department did, viras to estabhsh a precedent for error and injustice. Adjutant-General Thomas, in 1862, in reporting upon the case of Captain Henshaw, enlarged upon this error and made a closer connection between an officer's commission in his corps and his brevet than any of his predecessors had done. They had held simply that these commissions died together, but General Thomas decided that they not only died together but that they came to life together. He said, " the brevet commission is but a graft on that which the officer already holds in the army ; deriving all its vitality from the latter, it lives and dies with it, and can oniy be~ revived by reviving the latter. Had Captain Henshaw, for example, succeeded in his~efEorts To be re-instated in the army, it would only have been necessary to nominate him to the Senate for restoration as captain in the 7th Infantr)', for, with that com- mission, the brevet which grew out of it would instantly and of itself have revived, being so to speak a part of it." These extravagant views were undoubtedly based on the mistaken notion, already adverted to, that the commission in a corps, and the brevet in the army at large under the act of 1812, like the stafF brevets under the act of 1813, formed parts of one office. The theory, adopted by one adjutant-general after another, that a brevet for gallant or meritorious services must be based upon a commission of the next lower grade, and that it ceased tr exist if that grade was vacated, has never been consistently observei, by the Bureau itself. The grade, on which a brevet depends under this theory, is vacated as effectually if the officer goes up, as if he goes down, the military scale. The captaincy in a corps serving on this theory as the " basis " for a brevet majority in the army is actually vacated and filled by another as soon as the captain is promoted to major, but the Bureau never disputed the officer's right to all the benefits in date, etc., of his majority by brevet, and the record of it has always been preserved. A similar state of things obtains in relation to transfers. In these, officers have changed regiments, corps, and grades, giving up the grades on which it is said their brevets were based, and taking others, without any question having been raised as to the validity of their brevets. This was the case with Lieutenant R. C. Drum, trans- ferred, in 1848, from the gth Infantry to the 4th Artillery, and also with a number of officers transferred from old to new regiments, in 1861. Adjutant-General Cooper in his report (heretofore given in extenso), said that " the principle of these decisions will be found in an opinion of the attorney-general, Mr. Wirt, August, 1821." The fact that this opinion of Mr. Wirt should have been so OF BREVETS. 215 construed, furnishes a remarkable example of the astonishing results which may follow the constnidion of laws and decisions. The opinion had no relation whatever to such a case as that of Johnston, and announced no principle bearing upon that case. While the grade of major existed in the Marine Corps, during the war of 1812, several officers of that corps received the rank of major by brevet. On the return of peace, the corps was reorgan- ized and the grade of major abolished by act of Congress. After the grade had ceased to exist, captains, who had been brevetted toTrrrtaTfr re ri'ii) - ljl, ■■Tr t -.i^w £Dtitled tq _the position, pay, etc, of major by brevet. It was upon this claim that"ievSraropihi6nJ, liiLi'i!(il(Ji!i*j«" the one in question, were rendered. They held that, as there was no such grade as major, there could be no brevet major, that an officer could not be brevetted to a grade which had not existence. This was so plain, that, in discussing the question, the attorney- general was embarrassed by its very simplicity, and hence he says : " It seems to me a palpable solecism in military language to talk of the existence of a brevet rank, after the lineal rank by commission (of which the brevet is merely the shadow) has been destroyed." When first presented to him, 1820, the attorney-general considered the point so plain, that he disposed of it in a single sentence, saying : " It is my opinion that, as no such office as that of brevet major in the Marine Corps is recognized by aay act of Congress now in force, the President cannot confer that rank under the act of 1814." In 182 1, he said to the secretary of the navy :. " Office of the Attorney-General. ■"Sir: I have, in compliance with your request of the 15th instant, reconsidered the question wliich you submitted to me on the 17th of February, 1819, and on which I then gave an opinion adverse to the claims of the officers of the marine corps for brevet pay. With the most perfect willingness to retract that opinion if I should find it wrong, I have been the more confirmed in it, and can see nothing even like legal plausibility for the claim. "The act of i6th April, 1814, authorizing an augmentation of the Marine Corps, and for other purposes, authorized the President, in the 3d section, to confer brevet rank on such officers as should distinguish themselves, etc., with this proviso, that ' nothing herein contained shall be so construed as to entitle officers so brevetted to any additional pay or emolument, except when commanding separate stations or detachments, when they shall be entitled to and receive the same pay and emoluments which officers of the same grade are now, or hereafter may be, allowed by law.' The President, under the authority of this law, appointed several brevet majors. On the 3d of March, 1817, the act to fix the peace 2l6 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS establishment of the Marine Corps was passed, by which no majors were retained in service ; the only officers that were retained being one lieutenant-colonel commandant, nine captains and subaltern officers. The brevet majors consider themselves as being retained in service still, — at least for the purpose of receiv- ing the pay of brevet major under the proviso of the act of 1814, before quoted. But if they are in service as brevet majors for one purpose, they are so for all purposes. If the act of 1814 be in force for one purpose, it is for all, and the P resid ent may still go on to appoint breoiei^ ma u xs to the m^aa^'^WP^Sf^SiraTJfTr'uie 'j|2e^^^8?Si?SssTf!5wrTfi mat corps recognizes no such grade. It seems to me a palpable solecism in military language to talk of the existence of brevet rank after the lineal rank by commission (of which the brevet is merely the shadow) h-as -been destroyed, and not less so to talk of pay graduated by a rank which no longer exists, having been abolished by positive law. On what ground of reason can the brevet major claim to stand on a better footing than he would himself have stood if, instead of holding a brevet, he had held a commission ? Is the brevet more stable, or of higher grade, than the commission ? Or, is there more of contact in the one case than in the other ? I cannot perceive even the shadow of a foundation for the claim. ***** The argument seems to me to be worse, if possible, than the claim which it is adduced to support." On the Tith of December, 1822, the same attorney-general (Wirt) gave a third opinion, which makes it perfectly plain that the sole point which he was dealing with was as to the power of the President to brevet an officer to a grade not in the legal organ- ization. It will be observed, too, from the following extract, that he closes his opinion by positively asserting the "propriety of brevetting a captain to the grade of lieutenant-colonel, without the intermediate grade of major. He said : Office of the Attoeney-General, December 11, 1822. " Sir : The question submitted for my opinion on the 22d of April, 1820, was, whether the President was authorized to confer the brevet rank of major in the marine corps. The case which pro- duced the question was stated to be this : — Under the 3d section of the act of i6th April, 1814, in relation to the marine corps, the President had conferred the rank of brevet major on several cap- tains of corps, while the rank of major belonged to the organiza- tion of that corps. But one captain, equally meritorious with the rest, and equally entided, had been accidentally pretermitted. OF BREVETS. 21/ On this posture of things came the act of the 30! March, 1817, to fix the peace establishment of the Marine Corps, Avhich abolished the grade of major in that corps ; the single qiiestion therefore was, whether the President could now confer this grade in that corps by brevet, to relate back to the time when it should have been conferred. And my answer, on the 22d of April, 1820, was, that as the rank of major no longer existed in the corps, the President could not confer it by brevet. Captain Wainwright (the same gentleman, I presume, whose case is above stated) has renewed his application for brevet promotion, under the act of i6th April, 1814, on the ground that he has served ten years in the grade of captain ; and the case is again submitted for my opinion' on the question. " I. Whether Captain Wainwright is entided to brevet pro- motion ; " 2. If he be so entitled, whether it is to the rank of lieutenant- colonel, or that of major. " On the first question I think there can be ne' doubt. The act of i6th of April, 1814, is still in force ; and, in the 3d section, it expressly authorizes the President to confer brevet rank on such officers of the marine corps as shall have served ten years in any one grade. Captain Wainwright had served ten years in his present grade ; and, therefore, the brevet rank which the Presi- dent is authorized to confer there can be no propriety in withhold- ing, especially towards an officer so meritorious as, from the doc- uments with which you have accompanied your letter, Captain Wainwright appears to be. " The second question is one of more difficulty, and is, I humbly think, rather a military than a legal question. Laws on military subjects, as you know, Sir, seldom fall within the sphere of a lawyer's practice or consideration, and he is, consequently, without that key of experience in the subject-matter which is so essential to their just construction. The origin and nature of brevet rank, for example, the cases in which it is conferred, and the effects which it produces, are purely questions of military experience with regard to which we have no written laws, and all questions in regard to that rank must be, of necessity, beyond the province of the mere jurist, but the question which you have submitted to me demands all this military knowledge, and, although I shall proceed, according to my sense of duty, to give it the best answer in my power, yet I submit it, whether the Presi- dent would not be much more safe in resting on the opinion of military men, in this case, than on mine. " I had always supposed that brevet rank was the mere shadow of real, or commission, rank ; that the power of organizing our armies, and all the corps of our armies, belonging to Congress, it .A«(i^ r_\ 2l8 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS was theirs alone to say what officers there should be ; that these officers constitute the substantial commission grades or ranks of honor in the army, of which the brevets are the mere reflection ; and, consequently, that the President cannot confer brevet rank, except in relation to a correspondent rank by commission, which has been previously created by Congress. I had supposed that the reason of resorting to brevets (in our service, at least), was because the post to which the brevet pointed was already full, and, therefore, as the President could not promote to the commis- sion, he was authorized to confer the rank by brevet, which, beside the present honor, produced the fiyther effect of giving the brevet officer a priority to the correlative commission, whenever it should become vacant by the death or resignation of the present incumbent. ********* * * * But, in this country, Congress alone has the power to raise and support armies, to provide and maintain a navy, and to make rules for the government and regulation of the land and naval forces. The power to raise armies is a power to decide the quantum of the army that shall be raised ; that is to say, how many officers and privates, and of what grades the offi- cers shall be — a power which Congress has uniforml)' exercised. * * * It was from this view of the subject that I sup- posed that, when Congress had, by the act of 3d March, 1817, an- nihilated the office and rank of major in the marine corps, the President could not restore it by brevet. * * * * * * * If the power be not thus limited to the demar- cation of rank, as prescribed by Congress, I do not see what is to affix any limit to this power of conferring brevet rank, nor why the President may not, if he choose, confer by brevet the rank of lieutenant-general or field-marshal. ***** * * * It is my opinion, however, that the only brevet rank of major which the President can safely confer, under the law, as it stands, is that of major in the army of the United. States. * * * * If this rank cannot be conferred, then my opinion is, that Captain Wainwright should be brevetted as a lieutenant-colonel in the marine corps, be the consequences what they may." There is nothing in these opinions as to what grade an officer should hold as " the basis " of a brevet. The law settled that, by requiring simply that he should be an officer of the army. Neither did the opinion nor the law call for any particular sequence or re- lation between the grades to be held respectively in corps and by brevet. As it was the practice to confer a brevet commission upon an officer for each of his gallant deeds, and as those deeds were usually performed at long intervals apart, it is manifest that. OF BREVETS. 219 as a rule, the several brevets , of the same officer would be con- ferred in a regular series of ascending grades, the first being one grade higher than that held by him in his corps at the time it was conferred. But this was by no means the necessary course of pro- ceeding. If his services justified it, the officer could be immedi- ately brevetted to any grade which existed in the army, as indi- cated in Mr. Wirt's decision that the captain of marines should be brevetted a lieutenant-colonel. In fact, the brevet was a sys- tem of promotion in the army at large, and it was not required to occur in regular sequence, any more than the promotion among general officers was. When General Taylor gained the battles of Palo Alto and Resaca he was a colonel of infantry. As a reward for his distinguished services he was appointed a major-general in the army without being appointed a brigadier-general. It would be absurd to say, that with no restraining act on the subject, the power which could make an officer a major-general without the intermediate grade, could not make him a brevet major-general without the intermediate grade by brevet. The same applied to the case of Sheridan, who, when a captain, was appointed a briga- dier-general without filling any of the intermediate grades. The law demands only that the person on whom the brevet is conferred shall be an officer, and even that was not required until the act of 1812. The construction of the law by Mr. Wirt simply was, that the brevet must be to a grade — any one — existing in the legal military organization. This was the accepted, probably the unquestioned view of the subject, from 1812 down to about 1825, and under it Macomb's brevet of major-general stood entirely in- dependent of the loss of the grade (of brigadier-general) which he held when he received it. Allusion has already been made to the dissatisfaction which ex- isted during the war of 1812-14, concerning the rank, &c., of staff officers. Some of the old feeling still existed, though there was not much against which it could be directed. Roger Jones, in 1826-27 was about the only subject of it. He entered the service on the 3d of July, 1812, as a lieutenant in the marine corps. Im- mediately after war was declared against Great Britain he was transferred to the army, with the commission of captain of artil- lery. At the close of the war he was brevetted to major, and then to lieutenant-colonel for distinguished services. He had, in the meantime been appointed on the staff in the adjutant-general's department, and in i8i8 was adjutant-general of the northern di- vision, with the rank and pay of colonel. He remained in this staff position until the reduction of 1821, when, no provision being made for adjutant-generals of divisions he reverted to his cap- taincy in the artillery. In 1825 he was appointed adjutant-gen- 220 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS * eral, with the rank of colonel, still, however, holding his captaincy in the line. In 1834 he was brevetted brigadier-general. Soon after going to Washington, in 1825, to assume the duties of adjutant-general, he was urged to relinquish his captain's com- mission ; but, remembering his experience in the reduction of 1821, when, if he had not held the commission of captain of artil- lery — his office of adjutant-general being abolished by law, — he would have been out of service, he felt disinclined to surrender his commission in the line, for fear of being again placed in a like predicament. In the uncertainty of army affairs, especially as it concerned the staff, he naturally desired to hold his commission as captain of artillery as well as the office of adjutant-general. But holding two offices kept some one out of promotion, and offi- cers of the line insisted upon his giving up his captaincy. He made every possible effort not to yield this point, and, finally, to magnify the sacrifice he was asked to make, and thus furnish an additional plea against making it, he originated and ad- vanced the argument, that relinquishing his line commission would annihilate the evidences of his gallantry in the field. He said, in a report, dated February 28th, 1827 : — " I will here introduce an extract from the paper I respectfully submitted to the President in 1827: — ' My resignation at this juncture would doubtless be pleasing to some of those who might be benefitted thereby, either immediately or prospectively ; but these individuals should re- member the rights of others' — they should not forget that, in thus ' magnanimously ' throwing away this lineal commission, with its rate would be annihilated two honorary brevet field commis- sions.' " And again, in February, 1834, he made use of the same argument in more specific terms, saying : — " The value of Colonel Jones' commission in the line, it will be seen, is greatly enhanced in consequence of his holding also three honorary and highly prized brevets; the lineal commission being the predicate or basis on which those depend and now stand, according to a decision of the war department." There was no such decision of the war department, other than the rulings made by the adjutant-general himself. It is perhaps unnecessary to point out the fact, that although the functions of the lower grades which an officer may have held are superseded by his acceptance of higher commissions, he does not thereby lose the honor or advantage conferred by the lower commissions, whether they be in a particular corps or by brevet in the army at large. Adjutant-General Jones's argument that he would lose his brevets if he gave up his captaincy in the artillery was unsound. For the sole purpose of justifying himself in holding at the same time both his captaincy in the line OF BREVETS. 221 and his colonelcy in the staff, he assumed for brevets an insecurity which did not exist. Probably, without designing to depreciate the value of these commissions, he made a ruling concerning them which has been quoted by all his successors, only to be over thrown by higher authority whenever brought to the test, as was finally done in Johnston's case. In i860 that officer obtained a further hearing and a favorable decision, as shown by the following order, which has never been countermanded : — General Orders, No. 5. "War Department, "Adjutant- General's Office, " Washington, March 6th, i860. " I. The following orders have been received from the Secre- tary of War : — "War Department, March 6th, i860. " My attention having been called to the claim of Lieutenant- Colonel J. E. Johnston to the rank of brevet colonel, I have ma- turely considered the same, and arrived at the conclusions herein set forth : — " Lieutenant-Colonel J. E. Johnston, ist cavalry,United States Army, was commissioned brevet colonel, to date from 12th April, 1847, commission bearing date 19th of August, 1848. " He was subsequently commissioned brevet major and brevet lieutenant-colonel, to date respectively from 12th April, 1847, and 13th September, 1846, commissions bearing date 3d March, "On the 12th April, 1847, he was in commission as lieutenant- colonel of the then existing regiment of Voltigeurs, U. S. army, in which he served until he was restored to his original rank and date, in the corps of topographical engineers, in pursuance of the law of Congress, approved July 19th, 1848, — entitled, ' An act to amend an act,' entitled ' An act supplemental to an act,' — entitled ' An act providing for the prosecution of the existing war between the United States and the Republic of Mexico,' and for other purposes." Whatever may appear anomalous in the provision of law that authorized and enabled the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, thus to transfer Lieutenant-Colonel John- ton to the corps of topographical engineers, and restore to him the rank and date he held when he was commissioned lieutenant- colonel of Voltigeurs, must be considered as wholly independent of those other provisions of law, in pursuance of which he was com- 222 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS missioned brevet colonel, brevet lieutenant-colonel, and brevet major. " The law applicable to brevet commissions is entirely indepen- dent of the particular laws under which lineal commissions are conferred. " Lieutenant-Colonel Johnston was commissioned lieutenant- colonel, in pursuance of the law that created the regiment of United States Voltigeurs, and he was subsequently transferred to the corps of topographical engineers, — and commissioned as captain, to date from a day anterior even to the existence or creation of the said regiment of Voltigeurs ; in pursuance of the law specially authorizing such transfer. " The commission of brevet colonel conferring rank from 12th April, 1847, was a commission conferred in pursuance of the general provisions of law authorizing brevet commissions, and is perfectly valid in itself, without reference to any question that might arise concerning the commissions held by Lieutenant-Colonel Johnston in the corps of topographical engineers and in the regiment of Voltigeurs." " The commissions of brevet lieutenant-colonel and brevet major, subsequently conferred on Lieut.-Col. Johnson, cannot deprive him of his legal right to the commission of brevet colonel, al- though these latter may have been conferred on him by the President and Senate to compensate for the supposed loss of the former. " At previous reductions of the army, officers who had received brevet commissions, and who were commissioned anew or trans- ferred to a grade and rank less than that which they held, when the brevet commissions in question were conferred, retained their brevet commissions, notwithstanding the absolute loss of their original lineal commission. " In this connection, the cases of the late generals, Macomb and Towson, may be particularly cited. The former, retained on the peace establishment of 1815, as a brigadier and brevet major- general, was reduced, on that of 182 1, to the grade of colonel of engineers [his office of brigadier-general being abolished by law], but his brevet of major-general remained in full force. The latter, when captain of artillery and brevet lieutenant-colonel, was ap- pointed paymaster-general — an office then conferring no military rank. His right to the brevet lieutenant-colonelcy was never questioned, and Gen. Jackson conferred upon him the brevet of brigadier-general, passing over that of colonel, because he had twice been brevetted lieutenant-colonel. " The usage and precedents of the service, therefore, as well as the actual law and facts of the case, render it an imperative duty OF BREVETS. 223 to recognize the claim of Lieut.-Col. Johnston to the rank of brevet colonel. " He will, therefore, be recognized as of that rank from the date of April 12, 1847, according to the terms of his commission. "JOHN B. FLOYD, " Secretary of War. " II. Brevet Col. J. E. Johnston is assigned to duty as acting inspector-general of the army, according to his brevet rank. " By order of the Secretary of War, "S. COOPER, " Adjutant-General." No specific decision appears to have been made in the case of Andrews, doubtless for the reason that, not a long while after the order deciding the case of Johnston, he was raised to the position of paymaster-general, with rank of colonel. The case of J. C. Fremont differs from all others. While 2d lieutenant of topographical engineers, in 1845, he was nominated for the brevet of ist lieutenant, but he was confirmed by the Senate as captain by brevet "for gallant and highly meritorious services " in two expeditions commanded by himself, the first to the Rocky Mountains, which terminated July 31st, 1844, " to take rank from the last mentioned date." The President commissioned him ac- cordingly. Mr. Benton was at this time chairman of the military committee of the Senate. CHAPTER XI. THE WAR OF THE REBELLION. 1861-S. Although brevet rank is not limited to the regular army, it finds its legitimate field of operation only in that branch of the public service. At the commencement of the rebellion of 1861-5 there were 216 officers in the army holding brevet grades higher than the grades they held in their regiments and corps. When the war burst upon the country, suddenly and in huge proportions, the little band of regurlars consisted [January ist, 1861,] of i,og8 commissioned officers, present and absent. 15,304 enlisted men. Total, 16,402 224 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS This force was scattered over the vast territory of the United States, from the Atlantic Ocean and Gulf of Mexico to the British possessions, and to the Pacific Ocean. Nothing was more patent to the government, and to the country at large, than that this force was totally inadequate to cope with the insurrection. Although speedily concentrated upon the theatre of action, the regular army, from its limited numbers, was of comparatively little im- portance as a distinct combatant military organization. On the 15th of April, 1861 (the third day after the attack upon Fort Sumter), 75,000 three months militia were called into service, and after the disastrous battle of Bull Run, on the 2ist of July, 1 86 1, when people began to realize that the rebellion was not going to be so easily crushed, a million of volunteers were called to arms. Officers of every grade, from major-general down to 2d lieutenant, were authorized and provided for, and the brevet rank which then existed in the regular army was totally overwhelmed and lost sight of, officers of almost every grade being called to fill positions higher than they had attained, either by corps com- mission or brevet. The captain of to-day might be a brigadier- general to-morrow. During the war, there was, therefore, no occasion for conferring brevet rank ; but, towards its close, the country was eager to show its gratitude for the eminent and faith- ful services of its gallant defenders. The grades of lieutenant- general and of general were created, and brevet rank was again resorted to as a suitable recognition of military services which there were no other means of acknowledging. The government appeared not to know where to stop in the bestowal of these military honors, and no one who had earned reward, even in the smallest degree, was knowingly overlooked. Brevet shoulder straps were showered down " as thick as leaves in Vallambrosa." With a view to the establishment of a proper system in the bestowal of brevets, a board of distinguished officers was con- vened to meet at St. Louis, on the 14th of March, 1866, pursuant to the following order : Head-quarters of the Army, Adjutant-General's Office, Washington, March i, 1866. # * * * # * * 10. A board of officers will assemble at St. Louis, Missouri, on March 14, 1866, or as soon thereafter as practicable, to make rec- ommendations for brevet promotion, from any brevet or actual rank for which the appointment is already confirmed, to the grades of brigadier and major-general in the regular army. In making recommendations, the Board will be governed by OF BREVETS. 225 their personal knowledge of the officers they recommend, and by the otRcer's record of service during the war. The board will make its recommendations either from tli.e list of appointments to these grades already made but not confirmed, or from officers not so appointed. The recommendations will be of two classes : 1st. For " gallant and meritorious services." zd. For " faithful service." Recommendatio:is of the first class will only be for specific actions and campaigns, in which the officer recommended has been present; and where more than one brevet is recommended, the special action or campaign should be stated for which each brevet is recommended. The adjutant-general will at once forward to the senior officer of the board at St. Louis, Missouri, the recommendations for brevet, and other information necessary for the action of the board, in the case of all officers nominated or recommended for brevet promotion to the grades specifi^xl. Detail of Board — Maj.-Gen. W. T. Sherman, Maj.-Gen. George G. Meade, Maj.-Gen. P. H. Sheridan, Maj.-Gen. Geo. H. Thomas, Brevet Lieut.-Col. L. M. Dayton, Assistant Adjutant-General, Volunteers, recorder. ******* By command of Lieut. -Gen. Grant. E. D. TOWNSEND, Assistant At/jutant- General. The board, after much deliberation on the subject laid before it, submitted the following report to the adjutant-general of the army : " St. Louis, Mo., Marchj 24, 1866. , " General, — The undersigned, general officers, assembled in the city of St. Louis, Mo., on the 14th of March, 1866, pursuant to paragraph 10, of special orders. No. 92, from the adjutant- general's office, of March i, 1866, respectfully report that, being personally and officially acquainted with nearly all the officers whose names have been submitted to us, and whose most honor- able record is now before us, we feel an embarrassment, from an earnest and sincere desire to do all a full and liberal justice, whilst considerations of duty to the future interests of the regular array lead us to approve of a different course. We are now at the close of a ' four years' war,' in which vast armies have been engaged in more than a hundred great battles, with sieges, con- flicts, and marches innumerable. In all these armies, officers of the old regular army have borne an honorable and conspicuous 226 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS part, either with their appropriate commands, or as general officers of the volunteer organizations, and out of their number we are required to select the names of such only as should receive the brevet commissions of general officers in the new regular, army. This new army, we assume, will consist of about fifty regiments of infantry, twelve of cavalry, and five of artillery, aggregating not more than thirty-five or forty thousand men, and sixteen general officers, exclusive of the staff corps. The object of military rank is to clearly determine the right to command with the consequent responsibility to government ; and as in certain contingencies, officers holding brevet rank are entitled to command troops, it is manifest the same care should be exercised in conferring this grade as in selecting general officers for regular commissions ; and, for like reasons, the number of brevet generals should not be in undue proportion to the rank and file, or combatant part of the army itself, — ^apt to produce the very confusion whiclr military rank was designed to prevent. If the question were a perfectly new one, we would be inclined to recommend the abolition of the whole system of brevet rank, and to substitute in its place some other mode of reward for special gallantry in action, such as medals commemorative of the event, or to make actual promotions to vacancies without regard to prior rank. But brevet commissions have been conferred in all past wars, and during the present one, so that we are estopped and compelled to regard them as precedents binding on our judgment. We have, therefore, limited our action to a strict compliance with the terms of special orders. No. 92, and have selected lists of names for major-generals and brigadier-generals, arranging each in the order of rank by brevet which we think they should hold, specifying clearly the action or campaign for which the brevet should be conferred, but fixing subsequent dates from which the rank should take effect, arranging the dates so that no doubt will exist as to the order of their rank. We have also named the actions and campaigns for prior brevets, to connect their present army rank with maximum rank proposed. It may be superfluous to add, that we are clearly of opinion that brevet rank should never be conferred for any kind of military service but for distinguished services in the field in presence of the enemy ; and that, if meritorious conduct in the discharge of non- combatant duty be entertained, there would be no end to the confusion created by the very great disproportion of officers with high rank in comparison with the limited number of men. CM course, a great number of most meritorious officers will be sadly disappointed ; but, in the present case, these officers have already received brevet rank in the volunteer anny, which, with their OF BREVETS. 22/ honorable record, remains to them as evidence of past service, and forms a just title to future promotion in case of other wars or further increase of the regular army. We, at the same time, transmit to you lists of all the names whose claims we have examined for these brevet promotions, and we further state we have also examined all names in the army register of 1865, of the rank of captain and upwards. These papers, together with the journals of our sessions, are herewith transmitted and respectfully submitted." Another board of officers, to recommend brevet promotion in the infantry, was convened at Washington, by par. 3, special orders. No. 109, Head-Quarters of the Army, A. G. O., March loth, 1866. On the 24th of May ensuing, this board submitted the following report to the Adjutant-General of the Army : "Washington, D. C, May 24th, 1866. " Gen. E. D. Townsend, Asst. Adjt.-Gen., U. S. A. "The board of officers, convened by virtue of paragraph 3, special orders, No. 109, from the Head-Quarters of the Army, March loth, 1866, to recommend for brevet promotion in the infantry, report as follows : "The board met on the 18th day of March, 1866, and at once entered upon its duties, and have •continued from day to day to the present time. Circulars were sent to every officer whose claims came before it, soliciting narratives of their own services in the war, and that of their comrades. The replies to these circulars, information furnished by the war department, personal knowledge possessed by members of the board, evidence of many officers who have been invited to appear before the board, and other sources, have given very full and complete inforrnation of the military history, during the rebellion, of every officer of the infantry arm of the service. " The board has acted deliberately and, in their opinion, justly upon all these cases, and submit the enclosed lists of recom- mendations as the result of their labors. " It has not been deemed expedient, in but few cases, to recom- mend brevet promotion, except for service in face of the enemy, and then with the expectation that legislative action will define the relative positions of the two classes of officers so recom- mended. " The board have not deemed it expedient to limit their action with reference to the supposed future size of the army, but have in every case recommended such grades as, by fidelity, zeal, and 228 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS actual service in the field, appears to them to have been earned, and express their decided belief that, in no other way, can certain and impartial justice be arrived at. " The board is further of the opinion that brevet promotion for special acts of gallantry should take date and rank from such actions, and have so recommended. "It has recommended brevets for officers killed in action or died from wounds, and officers who, during the war, rendered dis- tinguished services and have since honorably retired, and respect- fully recommend the same action in their cases as with living officers now in the service. " Very respectfully, " Your obedient servants, "JOHN H. KING, " Col. 9th Inf. and Bvt. Brig.-Genl. "JOHN C. ROBINSON, " Maj. 2d Inf., Bvt. Brig.-Genl. "W. B. HAZEN, " Bvt. Brig.-Genl. "EUGENE CARTER, " ist Lieut. 8th U. S. Inf., " Recorder.'' A similar board of officers, to recommend brevet promotion in the staff, staff corps, cavalry and artillery, was also convened at Washington, by par. 2, special orders. No. log, Head-Quarters of the Army, A. G. O., March loth, i866, and, on the 2ist of June, submitted its report to the Adjutant-General of the Army, as follows : "Washington, D. C, June 2ist, i866. " To the Adjutant-General, U. S. Army, " General : — " The undersigned, members of the board convened by par. 2, special orders. No. 109, dated Head-Quarters of the Army, A. G. O., March loth, 1866, have the honor to submit, herewith, their recommendations for brevets in the staff, staff corps, cavalry and artillery. "An attempt to make out a list of recommendations for 'faith- ful and meritorious services ' soon led us to the conclusion that a failure to recommend any officer would be equivalent to saying that the officer had not performed his duty, thus making the lack of a brevet a more distinctive mark than the possession of it. We, therefore, submit but one list — that for ' gallant and merit- orious services in action.' OF BREVETS. 229 " We recognize, to the fullest extent, the valuable services of a large class of meritorious officers who have performed non-com- batant duties in and out of the field ; but we respectfully submit that a distinction should be made in the rewards given for services so different in their nature from those rendered by the officers embraced in the list herewith submitted. " We have not included in our recommendation the names of a large number of highly meritorious officers who served during the war as volunteers, and who have since been appointed in the regular army. " As their services were rendered when not in the regular army, and have been, in most cases, recognized by brevets in the volun- teer service, additional legislation would seem to be necessary to secure to them the brevets they desire in the army. " Indeed, it is no more than just that the claims of all ofificers, whether confirmed or not in their brevet rank, for services in the late war, should pass through the same ordeal. " A few distinguished officers have been confirmed in brevet • rank of low grades, at a date subsequent to their active service in the field, who, in our opinion, merit higher brevets, and they would have been so recommended could we have considered their cases under the order convening the Board. The only remedy for this, in our opinion, is to annul those brevets already confirmed, and subject the claims of the recipients to the same ordeal through which those of their brother officers have been passed. "We desired to submit, for such action as the proper authority might deem best, a list of deceased officers who had distinguished themselves during the war, but the large number, concerning whom no information could be obtained, rendered any attempt to prepare a just list of this description abortive. " Every effort has been made to obtain cerrect information con- cerning the services of all officers, and if we have failed to make the proper decision in some cases, it has not resulted from the lack of a sincere desire to do justice, nor from a want of earnest search into such material as was placed in our hands. Respectfully submitted, A. J. Smith, Lt.-Col., 5th Cavalry. Bvt. Maj.-Genl., Jno. G. Parke. Maj. U. S. Engrs. Bvt. Brig.-Genl., John Gibbon, Capt. 4th Arty. 230 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS Although the general subject of conferring brevet rank had been submitted for the consideration of these Boards, the bestowal of brevets which had begun before they were created was not a matter to be controlled by their reports. They may, indeed, have influenced action in particular cases, but certainly did not affect the general practice which had been adopted by the authorities, and the evils which resulted were in no wise removed by them. As time progressed, and the regular army settled down into its customary duties in time of peace, the lavish bestowal of brevets began to produce results — ^foreseen indeed by many — ^not conducive to the discipline and welfare of the service. The value of the honor had become depreciated from the lack of practicable means of equalizing it, where so many of every grade had ren- dered conspicuous service. This produced great dissatisfaction. Moreover, confusion, even in the ordinary details of service, resulted. For instance, brevet rank gave precedence oh general courts martial, and almost every officer detailed for that duty held brevet rank. This complicated the preparation of details, and produced discontent, from the fact that it might happen that a captain would sit as president of a court, while his colonel, as a member of the same court, would sit below him ; and from other similar incongruities. Such a state of things could not long exist, and brevet rank broke down mainly by its own weight. The result was the pas- sage of the act of March 3, 1869, which directed that "brevet rank shall not entitle an officer to precedence or command, except by special assignment of the President, but such assignment shall not entitle any officer to additional pay or allowances." The beneficial effect of this law was soon apparent in the service. On March i, 1869, two days prior to the passage of the act just mentioned, an act was passed repealing the 6ist article of war, approved April 10, 1806, and directing that "hereafter commis- sions by brevet shall only be conferred in time of war, and for distinguished conduct and public service in the presence of the enemy," and that " all brevet commissions shall bear date from the particular action or service for which the officer was bre- vetted." The appearance of this act may be explained as follows : — Prior to its passage, and especially at the close of the rebellion, brevets were freely conferred for meritorious services other than those in " the field." This was particularly the case in relation to the staff officers on duty in Washington in the various bureaux of the war department. The secretary of war and the President, under whose eyes these officers acted, considered that their OF BREVETS. 23 I services were faithful, distinguished and meritorious, and that the act of 1812, in authorizing the President to confer brevet rank on "such officers of the army as shall distinguish themselves b}' gal- lant actions or meritorious conduct" especially pointed to that species of reward in their cases. As the law provided the brevet as the reward for the meritorious services by which these officers were distinguished, its bestowal was inevitable. But complaints very naturally arose when it was found that long, arduous and hazardous field service, accompanied by gallantry in battle, on the one hand, and ability, industry and fidelity in the bureaux on the other, received rewards not only of the same degree but of exactly the same nature. It was further enacted, on the isth of July, 1870, that "no officer shall be entitled to wear, while on duty, any uniform, other than that of his actual rank, on account of having been brevetted ; nor shall he be addressed, in orders or official communications, by any title other than that of his actual rank." The brevet uniform, title, and right to command except by special assignment, were thus effectually banished from the army. Many officers were, of course, naturally unwilling to part with the last shred of their justly earned honor.s, but the law was impera- tive. A decision from the adjutant-general's office, dated Sep- tember 23, 1870, was however promulgated, that, under the act of July 15, 1870, " officers, if they please, have the right to affix their brevet titles to their signatures,, there being no prohibition in the law." Just prior to the close of the war, an act was passed (March 3, 1865,) which, though of no special bearing upon the subject in hand at the lime of its passage, yet afterwards gave rise to a dis- cussion which, in the course of its progress, went over almost the whole field of brevet rank. The act in question directed that, from the 1st of March 1865, until the close of the rebellion, the commutation price of officer's subsistence should be fifty cents per ration, with the proviso that such increase should not apply to the commutation price of the rations of any officer above the rank of brevet brigadier-general. Under this act, Henry J. Hunt presented a claim to the war departnlent, stating that he was a brigadier-general of volunteers from March 1, 1865, to Novem- ber, 22, 1865, and maintaining that, " as a matter of law and usage, a brigadier is not above the rank of a brevet brigadier." He claimed therefore the difference between the amount actually received by him for commutation of rations estimated at thirty cents, and the amount (estimated at fifty cents per ration) author- ized by the act. The claim was disallowed by the War Depart- 232 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS ment, and General Hunt then filed a petition in the Court of Claims. To this petition the United States demurred. The Court of Claims, however, gave judgment for the claimant, but the case being appealed to the Supreme Court, this judgment was reversed. (14 Wallace, 550.) In his argument before the Court of Claims, General Hunt urged that the question was substantially one of rank, and that there was no difference in the grade of the two officers, there being no intermediate grade known to the law between a colonel and a brigadier, or a brigadier and major-general (Article 2 of Army Regulations, Sections 6, 10, and 11). That our system of army rank, and rules and articles of war, being copied with great exactness from the English, it would be necessary to study the latter, in order more fully to understand the question. Rank was described as of two kinds, rank lineal and rank by brevet, the first being an officer in some particular troop, company, regiment, or corps of the army, and the second, in no particular subdivision of the army, but in the army generally ; so that, if there were any difference in grade of rank between the two offi- cers, it would seem to be in favor of the brevet rank, for the rea- son that an officer in the whole army would be superior to one in 2, part of it. General Hunt then referred to Worcester and Web- ster as deriving the word " brevet '' from the French word brevet, and as defining it to mean document, title, or paper. In military parlance, it is descriptive of the " tenure " by which rank is held, as distinct from the rank itself. Rank by brevet being conferred for meritorious services, and giving the persons upon whom it is conferred rank above that which they hold in their own corps (to be exercised on courts martial, or when serving with detachments composed of different corps, or by special assignment of the President), to hold that it is inferior to any other rank of the same grade, would be to degrade the rank earned by meritorious ser- vices, and r.ubordinate it to rank acquired by regular promotion, accidental circumstances, or political favoritism. It was further urged, that " if the two offices of brevet briga- dier-general and brigadier-general are equal in rank, no matter what the inferiority may be in other respects, in pay, command, value, or duration, it can have no influence in determining the question at issue, for, by the terms of the statute, the solution of the question turns solely upon the quality of rank, and of rank alone." On the part of the government, it was maintained that the words grade and rank, as used in the 4th and 5th paragraphs of the army regulations of 1863, are not synonymous, grade being a step in the series of officers in the army, and relating to a class. OF BREVETS. 233 or number, of persons who are in the same situation in, and with respect to, the series ; and rank being tlie relation an individual officer bears to some other officer or officers. Grade is a term applicable to a class ; rank, to an individual. So that two or more persons can be of the same grade, but not'of the same rank. Now the grade of an officer depends, it was said, on the title of his office or commission, but his rank depends consecutively on the grade, date of commission, time of appointment, and com- missions /^r se, and, in the case of officers never before in the ser- vice, on lottery. But these rules, being clearly intended to govern the question of rank of officers appointed to a regiment or corps, do not apply to brevet officers, whose services begin by appoint- ment to commands composed of different corps or detachments. In respect to these, the regulations provide that, " in case of equal- ity of rank by virtue of a brevet comrnission, reference is had to commissions not brevet." This, it was held, was the only part of paragraphs 4 and 5, of the regulations, applicable to brevet com- missions, and " consequently the comparison between ordinary and brevet commissions, equal in every respect save that of the quality of the commissions, can be made only by applying the last quoted rule." From these premises it was deduced that " the brevet brigadier-general's commission, inevitably confers the rank of an inferior grade ; while the brigadier-general's commission by its own inherent strength and character, confers on the brigadier- genei al a rank superior to that of the brevet brigadier-general." The opinion of the Supreme Court was as follows : " Our duty in construing acts of Congress is to give the mean- ing to the words which Congress evidently intended. It may be that, in the strict sense of the military term, the rank of brigadier and brevet brigadier is the same ; but it is well known that prac- tically they are by no means identical, and that the position of the former is in many respects better than that of the latter. Bre- vet rank is conferred, in theory at least, for special and merit- orious services, by commissions from the President, under author- ity of an act of Congress. It does not entitle the holder to cor- responding pay or command, except under special circumstances defined by law. When an officer, holding rank by brevet, receives a regular commission of the same grade, he is said to be promo- ted, and to become a full officer of that "rank. These circum- stances make it evident that there is a difference of military posi- tion between an officer by brevet and an officer by regular com- mission, and that the one is less eligible than the other. And Congress seems to have referred to this distinction of position rather than to technical rank, in the provision under consider^- 234 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS tion. If they did not, why employ the word brevet at all ? Why use the term brevet brigadier, when it was so easy to say briga- dier and thus avoid all ambiguity ? We think that Congress had in view the distinction between brevet rank and regular rank to which we have referred, and regarded the latter as above the for- mer. The practice of the department of war, as we understand, and of the accounting officers, has been in accordance with this view, and seems to us correct." This case was, therefore, finally decided adversely to General Hunt, not upon the ground of a difference between a brevet brig- adier-general and a brigadier-general, for the Supreme Court avoid- ed expressing any decided opinion upon that point, but upon the ground that there is a difference in position in favor of the latter, and that it was this difference which Congress had in view in using the word " brevet," instead of entirely omitting it, as it is reasonable to presume, it would otherwise have done. Volunteer Forces. At the commencement of the war of the rebellion, 1861-5, ex- isting laws provided for the conferring of brevets, upon officers of the regular army, but there was no law authorizing their bestowal upon officers of the volunteer forces called into service. The gallant services in the field, rendered by so many of these officers, naturally led to the passage of the act of March 3, 1863, which authorized the President, with the advice and consent of tlie Sen- ate, " to confer brevet rank upon such commissioned officers of the volunteer and other forces in the service of the United States, as have been, or may hereafter be distinguished by gallant actions or meritorious conduct ; which rank shall not entitle them to any increase of pay or emoluments." It is extremely probable that this act had its origin in a report made by General D. C. Buell to the war department, soon after the battle of Mill Spring, in the early part of 1862. This report was as follows : Head-Quarters, Department of the Ohio, Louisville, Feb. 9th, 1862. Adjutant-General Thomas, U. S. A., Washington, D. C. Sir : — I have the hcfhor to transmit Gen. Thomas's report of the battle of Mill Spring, and to commend the services of his troops to the approbation of the general-in-chief for their forti- tude under discomforts and difficulties, and their gallantry in battle. The question of rewards to meritorious persons will naturally present itself in this connection. It is one which requires to be OF BREVETS. 235 treated with very great caution. It is one which produces jeal- ousies and dissatisfaction in a regular army, and, composed as ours is, may lead to a most injurious condition of things. I would suggest that rewards for services in battle be conferred exclusively by brevets, leaving the full promotion (to the grade of brigadier) to flow exclusively from fitness for office, as shown by service. The advantage of this rule, in fact the necessity for it, I think obvious. ******* I am. Sir, very respectfully, Your ob't serv't, D. C. BUELL, Brig.-Gen'l Com'dg. Under the act mentioned, brevets in the volunteer forces were conferred upon many officers of the volunteers, and also upon many officers of the regular army who had received appointments in the volunteer army, still, however, holding their commissions in the regular array. The Army Registers exhibit, opposite names of officers of the army now in service, the positions and brevets held by them in the volunteer forces ; but as the General Govern- ment has issued no list of the volunteer officers who were mus- tered out at the close of the war, it has not been practicable to pl-epare a register showing who of them held brevets, and for what. As speedily as possible after the termination of hostilities, and the surrender of the Confederate armies, the volunteer forces were mustered out of service. Many volunteer officers received commissions in the regular army, but the majority went back to civil life. To keep green in their memories, and the memories of the American people, the heroism displayed in the long and arduous struggle. Congress enacted, on the 28th of July, 1866, that "all officers who have served during the rebellion as volunteers in the armies of the United States, and who have been, or may hereafter be, honorably mustered out of the volun- teer service, shall be entitled to bear the official title, and upon occasions of ceremony, to wear the uniform of the highest grade they have held by brevet, or other commission, in the volunteer service. In case of officers of the regular army, the volunteer rank shall be entered upon the official x^g\^\.&r,— provided, that these privileges shall not entitle any officer to command, pay, or emoluments." At the close of the war, many volunteer officers received com- missions in the regular army, and, as a reward for their services during the rebellion, an act was passed on the 2d of March, 1867, authorizing the President, by and with the consent of the Senate, to confer brevet rank on officers of the army of the United 236 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS OF BREVETS- States, on account of gallant, meritorious and faithful conduct in the volunteer service, prior to appointment in said army of the United States." The brevets conferred under this act were made to date from its passage, March 2, 1867. Brevets on the officers of the volunteer forces were liberally bestowed, and, as an instance of the latitude in this matter, it is recorded that the brevet of 2d lieutenant was bestowed on Private Frederick W. Stowe, of the ist Connecticut Light Artillery, "for meritorious services," to date from June 12, 1865. MEDALS OF HONOR. By the acts of July 12, 1862, and March 3, 1863, the President was authorized to bestow "medals of honor" on "such officers, non-commissioned officers and privates as have most distinguish- ed, or who may hereafter most distinguish themselves in action." Medals have been besto\yed, in some cases, under these acts, on enlisted men, but they have not been adopted as a species of reward for commissioned officers. APPENDIX. JSTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS OF BREVETS. 239 APPENDIX. A. Rank. The word " rank " is used in relation to military matters with various significations. 1. It means a line of soldiers standing side by side. In this sense of the word, we speak of the "front "and "rear" ranks. Rank and file is an expression used to designate collectively the men whose place is in the ranks. Thus we say, " there were so many rank and file." Sergeants do not, apparently, belong to the rank and file, but corporals do. [Duane's Mil. Die, "Rank."] 2. It is used to indicate the holding of a military commission ; as when we say, " a man has military rank," or " has the rank of captain." In this sense, it is synonymous with grade, and designates a class. 3. But " rank has also a quite different technical meaning in military language. In every array there is a series of grades, constituting what the French call "Za Hierarchie" There is, in our own service, for example, the grade of major-general, the grade of brigadier-general, the grade of colonel. Every colonel is of the same grade ; but is every colonel of the same rank? Certainly not. In each grade, say our reg- ulations, rank is to be determined by date of commission or appoint- ment. Indeed, much care is taken to establish rules which will sooner or later furnish a test for the rank of officers ; whereas, therefore, a number of officers may be of the same grade, no two can be of the same rank. Rank, in this sense of the word, then applies to the posi- ■ tion of the individual in relation to others. Under existing laws, it would [in this sense of the word] be, in gen- eral, inaccurate to speak of an officer having brevet rank. It is only when assigned to duty according to his brevet that this expression could be so. used, for in that case alone the brevet would furnish the means of determining his rank as to others. To say that brevet rank does not entitle an officer to command, except when assigned to duty according to his brevet, is to put the cart before the horse. He has no brevet rank until he is so assigned, unless we use the word rank in its more general and loose signification. Our laws provide that certain officers shall have the rank of colonels, lieutenant-colonels, and majors, of cavalry. What is the rank of a " colonel of cavalry ? " There is no such rank. There is not even such a grade. The grade is colonel, and the term " colonel of cavalry " designates an office to which the grade of colonel is attached. But the colonel of cavalry has distinct pay and emoluments, and it being the intention of the law to give these, the whole was lumped together as " rank, pay, and emoluments of colonel of. cavalry." Would it not have been more accurate to have said, " grade of colonel, and pay and emoluments of colonel of cavalry ? " 240 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS B. [Copy from report of commissioners for inquiring into naval and military promotion and retirement. par- LIAMENTARY PAPERS, 1840, Vol. XXII. to be found in the AsTOR Library, New York City. Evidence of Lt.-Genl., THE Rt. Honble. Sir E. Blakeney, K. C. B., Co.mdr. of the Forces in Ireland, commencing with question 1416, and continuing to the end of his evidence on p. 93.] 1416. Are you of opinion that a system of brevet promotion, after an officer has acquired the ranlc of lieutenant-colonel, should, as at present, go by seniority, or would you introduce any system of selec- tion, such, for instance, as an officer having greatly distinguished him- self in the field ? I think I should adhere to the present system. I should be afraid of the other creating great dissension and disappoint- ment on the part of the others. I think the circumstance of a man in the field getting promotion upon the spot is very stimulating, but I think the other is very questionable. 1417. The exception to promotion by selection or by purchase, stopping at the rank of lieutenant-colonel, as in the case of Sovereign's aides-de-camp, would you allow a commander-in-chief in the field to recommend a lieutenant-colonel to the Sovereign for the brevet rank of colonel, as he now does for the two inferior ranks, with a view to obtain active and distinguished major-generals at an earlier age ? I should be afraid of that exciting great dissension among the senior.-^. I should prefer a retired list a great deal. 1418. Have you ever found that promoting a major to be lieutenant- colonel by brevet, when acquired by service in the field, has on just grounds, given any mortification to others ? I think it very frequently has. 1419. Has it had that effect in such a proportion of cases as would justify an abolition of the system of giving brevet promotion for merit in the field ? I think for distinguished service in the field it is desirable to do it at the moment, but I do not think I should take out of the list of officers certain officers to promote them. 1420. That selection at present extends up to the rank of lieutenant- colonel, where is the objection to extend t' is power of the general com- manding an army in the field to recommend a- very distinguished lieutenant-colonel for the rank of full colonel ? I do not see any objection to it, if it be done in service in the field, if the commander- in-chief chooses to promote him to a colonel ; but I think it ought to be for really distinguished conduct in the field, not for anything else. 1421. You think, with this exception, that any other system than that of promoting colonels by the seniority of a brevet to be general officers would be liable to great objections ? I think it would. 1422. You are aware that in the French service the system of selection principally begins where ours ends, namely, with the senior officers, and that promotion goes on in a great degree by seniority in the lower ranks, there being no system of purchase in the French army ? Yes. OF BREVETS. 24I 1423. Do you conceive that jn a representative government like ours, where, to a cert-.in extent, pohlical influence must prevail, it would be detrimental to the cordial feehng, which at present exists among officers of the army, if officers were promoted by the command- er-in-chief, not for distinguished service, but selected for some supposed merits, to brevet field officers and even major-generals? 1 should think it objectionable, and I think it would be very detrimental. 1424. Practically you are an instance that, when the government want to employ an officer in a higher command than his rank usually confers, they can do it ; for instance, you were only a major-general when employed as a lieutenant-general commanding the forces in Ireland .'' I was. 1425. And local rank in our colonies can, when the emergency arises, eqvially be given according to the custom of the service ? It can. 1426. And also in the field ? Yes. 1427. The principle of the service is rise by seniority from the rank of lieutenant-colonel ? Yes. 1428. Up to the rank of lieutenant-colonel, it is a system of selection ? Yes. 1429. But it has always been, at least as far as we can recollect it, a system of rise by seniority from the rank of lieutenant-colonel, with the only exception of promotion made by the Sovereign of his aides-de- camp ? Yes. 1430. Would it not be deemed a departure from the usual practice of the service, and from the system of rise by seniority from the rank of lieutenant-colonel, if the commander-in-chief was to promote heutenant- colonels to be colonels ? I think it would be a decided departure from the system of the service. 1431. Do you not conceive that by the existing system the choice of the commander-in-chief of officers for comtnands is considerably re- stricted ? I do not think it is ; there is a large hst of different ranks. There are a great number of officers of great experience. 1432. During peace, officers have generally attained a very consider- able age before they arrive at the rank of major-general ? They have. 1433. Supposing it to be necessary for any particular service to appoint some younger men to be major-generals, according to the exist- ing system, it would be necessary by a general brevet to promote to that rank a large number of persons, many of whom would be unfit for the duties of the situation ? Yes. 1434. Do not you conceive that this is a system liable to considerable objection ? It depends upon what your object is. If you fix upon a particular portion for the senior rank, you must have a great confidence in them, or it must be partiality on the part of the person selecting. 1435. Under the existing system, in order to obtain the services of five or six efficient major-generals, it is probably necessary to promote to the rank of major-general 50 or 60 persons who are not efficient for their duties, from age, from ill-health, and from various circumstances ? I think that is a liability that any army is exposed to during peace, when promotion has been very slow. 1436. It entails a very considerable burden upon the public? It does ; but, then, what I would wish is a retired list between the rank of colonel and general 242 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS 1437. Under the existing system, of necessity tlie commander-in-chief fills up the colonelcies of regiments by selection ? He recommends, I believe. 1438. Those colonelcies are not filled up by any regard to seniority, but by selection, according to what are supposed to be the merits and claims from past service of different general officers ? Certainly. 1439. Without regard to seniority ? I think the commander-in-chief exercises his judgment very frequently with regard to seniority in some instances. 1440. In the same manner, by selection, all vacant commands are filled up ? They are. 1441. Do you conceive it to be impossible that any system should be established by which general officers should be appointed by selection to commands from the whole class of colonels and lieutenant-colonels, when wanted ? I should be afraid of its creating great discussion and disappointment, and that they would be plagued to death by officers making representations, and it would take time to know whether the choice would be incorrect or not ; it would depend upon the opinion of the commander-in-chief of that particular person. 1442. Assuming the system to be this, that commands were only held by major-generals for a definite period, and that when a vacancy took place in a command it was filled up from the list of colonels and lieutenant-colonels, would that create greater discontent among those passed over in that list than it now creates in the list of major-generals when one particular person is selected for a command ? I fear it would,, because we have so few opportunities of providing for general officers on the staff that they are most of them looking forward to get situations by which they could be employed. There is no possibility of retire- ment ; every man thinks he is capable of serving. 1443. You would object to any system by which the rank of major general should be permanently retained by a person doing duty as a colonel for a certain definite period ? Yes, I think that a major-general should be a major-general, that he should not be a colonel made a major- general for that particular duty. I believe there have been instances in which colonels have been appointed brigadier-generals. 1444. Practically, is not tlie difficulty referred to got over by selection at this moment, and at all times when you enter upon campaign ? Yes. 1445. Are not colonels appointed brigadier-generals? Yes. 1446. Are not general officers selected from those supposed to be the most efficient for the service when colonels are appointed brigadier- generals ? Yes, they get the rank of brigadier-general only to serve in a particular part of the world. 1447. So that any inconvenience which may be supposed to arise from officers being promoted by seniority is got over by making that selection ? Yes. 1448. You consider the British service, in which more than half the officers of the army on full pay are employed in the colonies abroad, to be much more severe than any other service in Europe, owing to the fact that other countries have few or no colonies ? Decidedly. Our army is exposed to much more extensive service than ainy other army in Europe. OF BREVETS. 243 1449. Many old officers, by adhering to their regiments for several years in unhealthy climates, may be obliged to retire from ill health, or other cause, with the rank of lieutenant-colonel, having efficiently and ably served the public 30 or 40 years — do you conceive it would be just for these officers, having a pride in their profession, and having spent their best years in the service, to exclude them from the rank of major- general upon the occasion of a brevet, and to stop their future pros- pects of reward when no longer able to go on with the active duties of the profession, in a great degree owing to severe colonial service already performed ? The rank of general has a responsibility that requires youth and everything else as much as you can secure it, and therefore I consider that an officer having arrived at a certain age, and having served in the colonies, where his health has been very much affected, can be of no use as a general officer; and if you gave him the rank of colonel and an honorary badge, I dare say he would be satisfied. 1450. Do not you think that, after that description of service, he has acquired a claim to the rank of major-general ? He may have a claim to the rank, but the country would not benefit by his services, and then you load the list of general officers, and it is said you have 500 or 600 general officers, and they have no army to command, and people do not understand that is a retirement almost. 1451. Your answer is given as meeting a prejudice which may per- vade a part of the public, but the question refers to the justice due to old officers of the army, whether it would be just after these officers have spent their lives in the severest service in the world, even in time of peace, to stop them when they are about to obtain the rank of major- general, because they are no longer able to perform active service ? Yes ; but that is taking up the case at the moment the officer is to be made a. major-general. I take it up long before that period, when he is a lieutenant-colonel with his regiment. I want to give him the rank of colonel, and an honorable badge and a certain pay, and stop him from being a general officer. I want to induce him to accept of that. 1452. The question had not reference to the mode of inducing officers •'.o leave the service for the sake of making vacancies, but it had refer- ence to the justice of the general system of brevet promotion, whether it would be just after officers had served in the field and in bad climates for 30 or 40 years, and were about to obtain the rank of major-general upon the ancient system of brevet, for the mere purpose of keeping down the list of general officers, the difference of expense to the public not being great between the two modes, whether, under all these circum- stances, you would stop the brevet promotion, as at present carried on, for the sake of adopting any other system ? — I should prefer that the retired list was fixed to colonels. 1453. How would you make new major-generals ? You come to the general list again. After you have made an opening of a certain num- ber of officers in the highest part of the lieutenant-colonel's list, you then get a younger class of officers. 1454. You still go on promoting by seniority, after taking out this certain number of colonels, whom you lay aside by providing for them the same pay that they would have as major-generals, ;£4o6 a-year ? Yes. 244 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS 1455-6. Then you still would have to select for the service of the regiments, and for the rewards of the service, from this new class ? Yes. 1457. Would there be any such great advantage from this system as would justify the laying aside of so many old officers who had served 30 or 40 years in bad climates ? I am looking forward to the efficiency of the general officers, and I want the rewards to stop at the colonels. 1458. The general officers are now selected from service abroad in the army, wherever it may be, from the whole list of general officers and colonels of the army, because, if they wanted, the colonels of the army may be taken and employed upon service abroad ? Yes. 1459. Would any advantage be derived from taking out a certain number from that class and laying them aside ? Would it be worth the expense, which you calculate to be ^100,000 a-year? If the list of generals were by that means reduced to about 250 or 300, then you would not have to provide for the generals you now have, and you would have 100 colonels to provide for with the present promotion for major- general ; and then an officer, seeing that he was likely to stop at colonel, would either sell his commission, or take the advantage of retirement as a full colonel. 1460. Are you proposing the system as a system to be adopted for one turn, and then to be laid aside, or do you mean it as a permanent system to be adopted in the army ? 1 should say a permanent system ; and that the system should be to adhere to the exact number of general officers, whatever number is fixed. The number I thought of was about 300. 1461. Is it possible that there ever could be a necessity with the British army for the employment of 300 major-generals ? Certainly not. 1462. Then why have 300 ? I mentioned that because we have got such a large number now, and we want in the first instance to make the reduction. 1463. Would it be desirable, in your opinion, to bring them down to the exact number that could be employed ? It is difficult to say. 1464. Supposing they were brought down to the exact number that could be employed, would you not still have to make a selection from the senior colonels or lieutenant-colonels in the army ? Certainly. I am satisfied of the great difficulty there is in the whole question ; but still I think that in the position the senior officers are in now, it would be a great deal to do something that would improve the system. 1465. Would not there be the same difficulties under those circum- stances that there are now in making a selection ; would not the only difference be that, instead of having three or four or five hundred major-generals, you would have the same number of colonels placed upon pensions and retired allowances of ;^4oo and ;£3oo a year, and the rest of the army would be in the situation of commanding officers of regiments to pass through this rank of colonel, and then be major- generals ? Yes, it comes to the same thing. 1466. Would the advantage to be derived from the system be other than that of stopping the clamor upon the subject of the number of major-generals there are in proportion to the size of the army, and the OF BREVETS. 245 means of employment tor them? It would lessen it a little ; but I do not suppose it would do it awaf entirely. 1467. By the present system, when once an officer obtains the rank of lieutenant-colonel, the consideration of whether he is a wealthy man, or whether he is a man of interest with the government of the day, or any other consideration, ceases to operate ; he is sure of rising to the rank of major-general if his health is good and his conduct good ? Yes. 1468. You say that the advantage you would propose from selecting officers to become major-generals, and placing old officers of the rank of colonel upon the shelf, would be that you would have younger major- generals for service ? I should hope so. 1469. When you came to select for regiments, how would you deal with the old colonels ? You have placed aside men who have passed their lives and sacrificed their health, perhaps after 30 or 40 years' ser- vice in our colonies ? Then I would consider that they had voluntari- ly accepted of these retirements, having got the honorary badge and the annuity. ^ 1470. Then you would make the retirement voluntary ? Voluntary. My feeling about an officer of old standing is,, that he does not like to go out a fourth or fifth time to the colonies, and therefore he would accept the rank of colonel for his life and would not look forward to be a general officer. 1471. Supposing an old officer, so worn out, would not accept the temptation you offer, would you still allow him to become a major- general in his turn ? The custom of the service sometimes now is, that an officer who is inefficient for doing the active duties of the ser- vice gets a letter to be permitted to sell. 1472. Supposing this officer has got to the rank of colonel before he has become in that state as to be sent away, but still is so old that you think he ought not to be made a major-general, if he was obstinate and thought he could do his duty, you would not force him out ? I think I should. 1473. How would you decide upon a man's being unfit ? What board or what officer should have the decision of it ? I would not take a step of that kind unless the man was so infirm that he was not equal to the active duties of a regimental officer. 1474. To whom would you leave it to decide that ? To the com- mander-in-chief, upon the report of a medical board. 1475. Is there not a power now of having a medical board upon officers ? Yes. 1476. Therefore that would be no alteration from what now exists ? No. 1477. You are aware that it has frequently been a subject of discus- sion whether the Guards ought to have the advantage of the increased rank which they now possess. What is your opinion upon that sub- ject ? I think that, as they are the Queen's household troops, I have never heard the army complain of it. 1478. Do not the larger proportion of officers who rise to the rank of major-general acquire their rank in the Guards, and not in the corps which are subject to all the vicissitudes of colonial service ? I should say, certainly, that a difference is felt ; that is to say, the Guards are 246 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS considered to be favored as compared with the line, in consequence o one being at home getting rank, and the other being abroad and not getting it ; but I do not think the line ever think of complaining of it, as they consider the Guards a body of honorary troops about Her Majesty. I have never heard it complained of. 1479. There is no wish among the officers of the line that commis- sions in the Guards should be given away as a reward for good ser- vice in the line, or that any other system should be adopted ? We have always been very distinct, the Guards and ourselves. I have never heard it mentioned ; I never heard of officers being jealous or complaining of it. 1480. Is not it the fact that exchanges between officers of the line and officers of the Guards are going on constantly ? Constantly^ 1481. And this advanced promotion of the officers of the Guards is, in fact, enjoyed in that way by the line ? It is. 1482. Was it not the case at the end of the last war, that when there was a promotion in the Guards a considerable number of the commis- sions of that promotion were given to officers of the line who had served with the army abroad ? Yes, a large number. - 1483. Sir Henry Hardiiige was one ? Yes. 1484. With regard to the relative proportion of the Guards and of the line, are you aware that the number of the battalions of the Guards at present is exactly the same as it was in Charles the Second's time, whilst the line has been augmented to be about two thirds stronger than it was at that time .' — I am not aware of that. 1485. Supposing that to be the case, any disproportion that formerly existed is rendered much less now ? Yes. OF BREVETS. 247 VICTORIA R. Whereas, We have approved the recommendations of the Commis- sion appointed by Our authority to inquire into the several modes of promotion and retirement in Our military forces : Our will and pleas- ure is, that from and after the date hereof [October 6, 1854], the following rules shall be established for the future promotion and retire- ment of officers in the army, and that by these Our rules, Our com- mander-in-chief shall govern himself in recommending officers for promotion and retirement; — PROMOTION. 1. That the rank of field-marshal be given without reference to seniority. 2. That the general periodical brevets be, for the future, abolished. 3. That there shall be a fixed establishment for Guards and line of 100 general officers upon unattached pay, in addition to the general officers who are colonels of regiments, majcing in all 234, of whom 50 shall be generals, 70 lieutenant-generals, and 114 major-generals. 4. That until the existing establishment of general officers be reduced to 234, the senior colonels on the list shall be promoted, or the supernumerary previously promoted for distinguished service shall be admitted alternately after the third vacancy on the fixed general officers' list, this limitation being observed until the excess is reduced. 5. That the major-generals hereafter promoted for distinguished service shall, after the number of generals on the fixed establishment has been reduced to 234, be placed on the permanent general officers' list in the proportion of one major-general for two vacancies, the second vacancy being filled by seniority from the colonels' list. 6. That those general officers in the receipt of half-pay only of their last regimental commissions, be not included in the 234 above men- tioned, but that their names be printed, according to seniority, on the same list with the others as now, but with an asterisk prefixed to them. 7. That the rank of full colonel be given to officers after serving for three years with the rank of lieutenant-colonel in the actual command of regiments, or for the same period as second lieutenant-colonels of regiments, or as majorand lieutenant-colonel, or major, in the household cavalry, or as mounted officers of the guards, or on the staff in the fol- lowing situations, viz. : assistant adjutant-general, assistant quarter- master-general, military secretary (or assistant military secretary where there shall be no military secretary) to such general officers alone as are exercising the supreme command on a station, or commissioner to the head-quarters of an allied army, or after serving six years as a lieu- tenant-colonel as equerry to the sovereign. 248 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS 8. That field officers, commissioned as such before the 20th of June, 1854, be allowed to rise, by brevet, as under the regulations then in force ; but no officer promoted to the rank of field officer, on or after that dat'i, is to rise from the rank of lieutenant-colonel to that of a colonel, otherwise than by three years' service in the former rank, as above described, or as a reward for distinguished service or by appoint- ment to be Queen's aide-de-camp. 9. That in cases where colonels shall be appointed, without regard to seniority, to commands.as majors-generals, their temporary rank, if they shall have conducted themselves to our satisfaction, may be made per- manent, after having held such commands five years in peace, or after any shorter period in war. upon the recommendation of our cowminder- in-chief. That, in like manner, the temporary rank of general and lieu- tenant-general may be given, whenever the convenience of the service requires it, and may be confirmed in a similar manner. 10. That in addition to the colonels promoted by seniority to be major-generals, colonels shall be eligible for promotion to the rank of major-general, major-generals to the rank of lieutenant-general, and lieutenant-generals to the rank of general, for distinguished service in the field. In the case of officers promoted to the rank of general officers, as a reward for distinguished service in war, the recommenda- tion, on which the service of the officer shall be detailed, shall be pub. lished in the general orders of the army and in the ^'■Gazette" what it view to insure the responsibility attaching to an appointment thus made out of the regular course of army promotion. ti. That every vacancy in the fixed establishment of general officers shall be filled by the promotion, where there is no supernumerary, of the senior colonel qualified to succeed to the rank of major-general, and to be placed on the fixed establishment, under the regulations now in force, and that vacancies in the ranks of general and lieutenant-gen- eral be filled in the same manner. If there be more than one super- numerary who has been promoted for distinguished service, the promo- tion of the senior colonel shall take place on every second vacancy only, until the supernumeraries be reduced by the appointment alter- nately of a supernumerary and the promotion of a colonel. 12. That promotions shall be made in the ranks of fiefd officers, below the rank of colonel, from time to time, or as vacancies occur in the major-general's fixed establishment. 13. That any captain, major, or lieutenant-colonel, maybe rewarded by promotion for distinguished services in the field. In cases, however, where such promotion would deprive the officer of regimental employ- ment, by which the interest, either of the service or of the officer might be prejudiced, brevet rank may be given, to be converted into regi- mental (or substantial) rank at an early subsequent period. 14. That the commands of general officers,. and other situations on the staff, both at home and abroad, shall not be held for more than five years, unless by appointment. 15. That the privilege of selling out of the army, retaining the name of the officer in the army list in italics, which is now confined to full colonels and officers having the Order of the Bath, be extended, with permission of the commander-in-chief in each case,Xo all field officers,. OF BREVETS. 249 16. That no officer shall be promoted* to the rank of captain until he shall have been two years an effective subaltern. 17. That no officer shall be promoted to the rank of major until he shall have been six years effective as subaltern or captain. 18. No medical candidate, who has not passed his examination at the Royal College of Surgeons of London, Edinburgh, or Dublin, shall be eligible for the commission of assistant surgeon, and he must have served as such on full pay, five years, before he shall be eligible for pro- motion to the rank of staff surgeon of the second class. 19. Staff surgeons of the second class must have served ten years in the army on full pay, before they shall be eligible for the next step of rank. A staff surgeon of the first class must have served three years at home, or two years abroad, in this rank, before he shall be eligible for promotion. 20. A deputy inspector-general of hospitals must have served five years at home, or three years abroad, in this rank, before he shall be eligible for promotion to the highest rank of inspector-general. UNATTACHED PAY, RETIRED FULL PAY, AND HALF PAY. It is our further will and pleasure, that the grants of unattached pay and other rates of pay to general officers not being colonels of regi- ments, and of retired full pay, to officers of our army, shall be regulated by this royal warrant, to be administered and interpreted by our secre- tary at war as the sole and standing authority for regulating such grants. UNATTACHED PAY. 2t. Officers removed from their commissions as field officers in regi- ments of foot guards, in consequence of being promoted to be general officers, shall receive unattached pay according to the following scale, viz. : lieutenant-colonel, 600/. a year ; major, 550/. a year. 22. Officers promoted to be general officers, from full or half pay commissions in the line, shall, if duly qualified, receive unattached pay of i/. 5j. a day. 23. The number of general officers upon the establishment of un- attached pay of i/. 5 J. a day, or upwards, not being colonels of regi- ments, shall be limited to 100. 24. A general officer, not being colonel of a regiment, in the event of his regiment being reduced, may be placed in the first instance, as supernumerary upon the sai^ establishment of unattached pay at i/. ss. a day, but shall fall into the vacancy that shall occur therein, until re- appointed colonel of a regiment. 25. _A colonel promoted to the rank of general officer, as a reward for distinguished service in war, or in consequence of having held a command with temporary rank as general officer, shall be placed, in the first instance, as supernumerary on the said establishment of un- attached pay at 400/. a year, until he shall fall into a vacancy on the fixed establishment of general officers. 12 250 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS 26. An officer now on the list of general officers, •whether on full or half pay at the time of his promotion, but who is in excess of the limited number of 100 entitled to unattached pay of \l. ss. a day or upwards, shall receive, if duly qualified by service, an allowance in lieu of unattach- ed pay at the rate of 400/. a year, or, if lieutenant-colonel of cavalry at the time of his promotion, the next full pay of that rank until elected to the establishment of unattached pay at il. $s. a day, or appointed to be colonel of a regiment. 27. To entitle an officer to the unattached pay of a general officer, or to the allowance in lieu of such unattached pay, such officer must have ?iCt\i3\\.y served six years with the rank of a regimental field officer, either with a regiment of the line, or in some other substantial military employment in the public service, or as field officer of the Foot Guards, or on the staff appointment of assistant adjutant-general, assistant quartermaster-general, military secretary or assistant military secretary (where there shall be no military secretary) to such general officers alone as are exercising the supreme command on a station, or as commis- sioner to the head-quarters of an allied army ; or, having obtained the rank of regimental field officer, shall have been obliged to go upon half pay on account of reduction, or in consequence of ill health contracted in the service (as estabhshed by the report of a board of medical offi- cers), or in consequence of wounds received in action, before he had served the six years above described. 28. To the limitations contained in the preceding article, the follow- ing exceptions only will be admitted, viz. : Appointment of major-general on the staff ; Appointment to a military government. In these cases, the insufficiency of service as a regimental field offi- cer will not render an officer ineligible for the unattached pay. 29. The benefit of unattached pay shall not be extended to any gen- eral officer who, when he last went on half pay, received the differ- ence ; nor to any officer who went upon half pay at his own request, in time of war, before he had completed an aggregate full-pay service of 30 years, of which period six years shall have been with the rank of regimental field officer, nor to any officer whb went upon half pay, at his own request, in time of peace, before he had served six years with the rank of regimental field officer. Officers thus situated shall continue to receive the half pay only of which they were in receipt at the time of their promotion to be general officers. RETIRED FULL PAY. 30. The retired full pay list of field officers and captains shall be prospectively fixed at 60,000/. a year ; all officers who were on the full pay retirement previously to the Royal Warrant of October, 1840, be- ing considered supernumerary to the establishment of 60,000/. 31. The colonels, lieutenant-colonels, majors and captains, allowed to retire upon full pay, shall be selected and recommended according to their regimental, and not according to their brevet rank ; but no offi- cer shall be placed on the retired full pay list who has not served on full pay for 2 1 years and upwards, unless he ha.sbeen obliged to go upon OF BREVETS. 251 half pay in consequence of ill health contracted in the service (as es- tablished by the report of a board of medical officers), or in conse- quence of wounds received in action, before he had served the 21 years prescribed. 32. Each officer placed on the retired full pay list shall receive a step of brevet rank, together with the full pay of the rank from which he re- tired ; but such officer cannot be furtlier promoted. 33. Officers appointed to veteran battalions shall not, on their reduc- tion or retirement therefrom, acquire any claim to retired full pay. TEMPORARY ALLOWANCES IN THE NATURE OF HALF PAY. 34. An officer, having served less than 3 years, will, if reduced, re- ceive only a temporary allowance of half pay, according to the follow- ing scale : Services on full pay. Temporary allowance. Under i year For i year. 1 and under 2 years. .... For 2 years. 2 and under 3 years For 3 years. The temporary allowance ceases at the termination of the above re- cited periods ; or previously, if the officer shall have been previously placed on full pay. 35. But an officer, who has been placed on temporary half pay, is eligible to be appointed to a full pay commission, either by exchange or otherwise, provided his appointment take place within five years after he has ceased to receive ternporary half pay, in which' case his former service is allowed to reckon. 36. The exchange to full pay, under the preceding article, may be made with a full pay officer entitled to half pay. 37. An officer who has been reduced with only a temporary allow- ance, having purchased his commission, may receive the regulated price thereof from the pubhc, through our secretary at war, and the public shall be re-imbursed by the sale of a first full pay commission which would otherwise have been conferred without purchase ; but these sales shall not be required in any greater proportion than one for every two such vacated commissions. HALF PAY. 38. The half pay of the army is granted as a remuneration for past military services, and also as imposing an obligation on the officer to re- turn to his military duties whenever called upon ; therefore, any officer not obeying the call is liable to forfeit his half pay. 39. An officer shall be entitled to be placed upon the half pay estab- lishment, if compelled to retire in consequence of wounds received in action. 40. An officer, having served more than three years, shall be enti- tled to be placed upon the half pay establishment, if compelled to re- tire in consequence of ill health contracted on duty, as certified by the medical board, or medical officers, to whom he has been referred for ex- amination. Unless the result of such examination shall be received by 2S2 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS our commander-in-chief and secretary at war, he will be considered to have retired upon half pay for his own convenience. 41. An officer, having actually done duty in some regiment or corps, or in some other miUtary capacity in the public service, for a period of at least three years, shall be entitled to be placed on the half pay estab- lishment on reduction from full pay. 42. No officer shall be permitted to retire upon permanent half pay until after a full pay service of 21 years, except on account of unfitness for service from wounds received in action or from certified ill health contracted in and by military service. 43. No garrison commission or appointment shall give an officer any claim to half pay or retirement. 44. The residence of the half pay officer is to be stated every quar- ter in his declaration, whether his half pay be received by an agent or by himself. 45. No officer of haH pay shall, of right, have a claim to sell or com- mute his half pay ; the permission shall be governed by such consider- ation of the individual case as may induce our commander-in-chief and secretary at war to recommend it. 46. If a subaltern officer, whose service confers a claim to half pay, be desirous of retiring from the army by the sale of his commission, the following rules should be observed : — 1st. If he purchased his commission, the regulated price may be granted (whether he should be receiving half pay or a temporary allow- ance in the nature of half pay). 2d. If he did not purchase his commission, and had served less than seven years on full pay in the army, he may be allowed to receive 100/. for each year of service as a commissioned officer, not, however, ex- ceeding the regulated price of the commission he held. 3d. If a non-commissioned officer shall have been promoted to the rank of an ensign, or cornet, or adjutant, he shall not have a claim to retire by the sale of his commission, unless he shall have served in the army as an officer of full pay upwards of one year, in which case he may be awarded the full price of the commission which he shall have received without purchase, or such portion thereof as, with reference to the length of his actual service, shall be deemed proper by our com- mander-in-chief and secretary at war. 47. An officer of any of the undermentioned ranks, having entered the service since the termination of the war in 1815, and having been permitted to exchange to half pay, not on account of ill health, but for his private convenience, before he has served seven years on full pay, shall be allowed only the old rate of half pay specified in the following schedule : OF BREVETS. 253 Cavalry. New rate. Old rate- Colonel - ■ Lieutenant-Colonel Major . . .... Captain of infantry having superior brevet rank, and provided he shall have served as captain on full pay for at least two years immediately before retirement oil half pay - Captain of cavalry with brevet rank, exchanging to half pay, after two years full pay service, with a cap- tain of infantry - - Lieutenant ■ - - .... Lieutenant of infantry, if commis- sioned seven years as a lieutenant in the regular army at the date of being placed upon half pay - Lieutenant of cavalry of five years standing, if entitled to reckon two years for the battle of Waterloo Cornet - - ..... Second lieutenant and ensign Adjutant, if not commissioned as lieutenant - . - ■ Per diem. Per diem. s. d. 12 6 10 48 3 6 New rate. Old rate. Per diem. 13 10 2 6 4 Infantry. s. d. 14 6 II 96 76 4 46 Per diem. s. d. 12 8 6 76 2 4 I 10 4 If the retirement should be for the public convenience, by reduction or otherwise, or in consequence of ill health certified by a medical board, the officer will be allowed the new rate of half pay. 48. For every three vacancies occurring by death in the British half pay list, in the ranks of colonel and lieutenant-colonel, one major serv- ing upon full pay may be promoted to the unattached rank and half pay of a lieutenant-colonel of infantry. In like manner, for every three vacancies in the rank of major, one captain may be promoted from the full pay to the unattached rank and half pay of a major ; and for every three vacancies in the rank of captain, one lieutenant may be promoted to the unattached rank and half pay of a captain. The officers so pro- moted under the regulation shall retain their claims for pensions to their widows at the rate accorded to their new rank. The vacancies which these promotions will create on the full pay list shall, in all cases, be filled from the half pay list. 49. The additional 100/. a year to 20 lieutenant-colonels on the half pay list, established by former Royal Warrants, shall be dismissed, sub- ject to existing interests. 254 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS D. Copy of Resolutions of November 24, 1778, giving rules with regard to rank and promotion : — Tuesday, November 24, 1778. Congress took into consideration the report of the Committee of ar- rangement, and thereupon came to the following resolutions : Whereas, the settlement of rank in the army of the United States has been attended with much difficulty and delay, inasmuch as no general principles have been adopted and uniformly pursued : Resolved, therefore, That, upon any dispute of rank, the following rules shall be hereafter observed : 1. For determining rank in the Continental line, between all colonels and inferior officers or different States, between Uke officers of infantry, and those of horse and artillery appointed under the authority of Congress, by virtue of a resolution of September i6th, 1776, or by virtue of any subsequent resolution prior to January ist, 1777, all such officers shall be deemed to have their commissions dated on the day last mentioned, and their relative rank, with respect to each other, in the continental line of the army, shall be determined by their rank prior to the i6th day of Sep- tember, 1776 : this rule shall not be considered to affect the rank of the line within any State, or within the corps of artillery, horse, or among the 16 additional battalions, where the rank hath been settled ; but shall be the rule to determine the relative rank within the particular line of artillery, so far as the rank remains unsettled. 2. In the second instance, preference shall be given to commissions in the new levies and flying-camp. 3. In determining rank between continental officers, in other respects equal, proper respect shall be had to their commissions in the militia, where they have served in the continental army for the space of one month. 4. All colonels and inferior officers appointed to vacancies since the 5th day of January, 1 777, shall take rank from the right to succession in such vacancies. 5. In all cases where the rank between two officers of different States is equal, or between an officer of state troops and one of cavalry, artillery, or of the additional battalions, the precedence is to be determined by lot. 6. All officers who have been prisoners with the enemy, being ap- pointed by their State, and [who] again into service, shall do it agreeably to the following rule, that is to say : all of the rank of captain, and under, shall enter into the same regiment to which they formerly belonged, and if theregiment is dissolved, or otherwise reduced, they shall be entitled OF BREVETS. 255 to the first vacancy in any regiment of the State in their proper rank, after the.officers belonging to such regiment have been provided [for ?]. 7. The rules of rank above laid down between officers of different States are to govern between officers of the same State, except in cases where the State has laid down a different rule or already settled their rank. 8. A resignation shall preclude any claim or benefit from former rank under a new appointment. Whereas, from the alteration of the establishment and other causes, many valuable officers have been and may be omitted in the new ar- rangement as being supernumerary, who, from their conduct and services, are entitled to the honorable notice of Congress, and to a suitable provision until they can return to civil hfe with advantage : Resolved, therefore. That Congress gratefully acknowledge the faithful services of such officers, and that all supernumerary officers be entitled to one year's pay of their commissions respectively, to be computed from the time such officers had leave of absence from the commander-in-chief on this account. And Congress do earnestly recommend to the several States, to which such officers belong, to make such further provision for them as their respective circumstances and merits may entitle them to. Resolved, That all officers who have been in the service, and, having been prisoners with the enemy, now are, or hereafter may be, exchanged, or otherwise released, shall, if appointed by the authority of the State, be entitled, in case of vacancy, to enter into the service of their respective States in such rank as they would have had if they had never been captured ; provided always, that every such officer do within'one month after his exchange or release, signify to the authority of the State to which he belongs, his release and his desire to enter again into the military service. Resolved, That every officer so released, and giving notice as ' aforesaid, shall until entry into actual service, be allowed half-pay of the commission to which, by the foregoing resolve, he stands entitled ; provided always, that in case of his receiving any civil office of profit, such half-pay shall henceforth cease. Whereas, it will be for the benefit of the service that some rule of promotion be established ; therefore. Resolved, That it be recommended to the several States to provide, that, in all future promotions, officers rise regimentally to the rank of Captain, and thence into the line of the State to the rank of Colonel, except in cases where a preference may be given on account of distin- guished merit. Resolved, That no brevets be, for the future, granted, except to officers in the line, or in case of very eminent services. Resolved, That a brigadier, out of brigadiers of the infantry, be ap- pointed by General Washington to command the cavalry. Resolved, That paymasters, not being of the rank of Captains, quartermasters and [or ?], adjutants, be entitled to receive 20 dollars per month subsistence-money, in lieu of rations. Resolved, That all officers and persons employed on the staff shall receive for subsistence-money one third of a dollar for each extra ration heretofore allowed them. 256 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS Resolved, That Lieutenant-Colonel Stevens, of the artillery, now holding that rank by brevet, be appointed a lieutenant-colonel of artillery ; and that his commission bear date from that of his brevet ; and that he be entitled to take command on the first vacancy that may fall in the artillery. Resolved, that adjutants, paymasters and quartermasters, taken from the line, be again admitted into the rank they would have been entitled to, had they continued in the line ; and [that] such adjutants, paymasters and quartermasters, not taken from the line, may be admissible into the line, in such subaltern rank as, by a signed certificate from the field oflScers of their respective corps, they shall be deemed competent to. Resolved, That the regiment commanded by Col. Moses Hazen be continued on its original establishment ; and that no new appointments or promotions of officers be made therein until the further order of Congress. Ordered, That the committee of arrangement transmit to the board of war lists of the oificers of the army, arranged by them in the several regiments and corps, specifying the time of their respective appoint- ments, or promotions, to their present rank, to be registered in the war office ; and that commissions be issued to the said officers accord- ingly, and the secretary of the board of war is hereby ordered to transmit copies of the said arrangement to the commander-in-chief of the army. Resolved, That the board of war be authorized to finish the arrange- ment of the army agreeably to the^resolutions of Congress, and that the committee of arrangement furnish the board with such papers and documents as they are possessed of respecting the same ; and that all disputes about rank in the army be referred to the commander-in-chief, to be determined according to the rules of the army. Ordered, That the board of war forthwith lay before Congress a list of the continental brigadiers and battalions, together with the states to which they respectively belong. Adjourned to ten o'clock to-morrow. OF BREVETS. 257 WASHINGTON'S LETTERS TO CONGRESS. Head-Quarters, Heights of Haerlem, October 7 .776. Sir:— * * * * Before I conclude, I must take the liberty to observe that I am under no small difficulties on account of the French gentlemen that are here in consequence of the commissions they have received — having no means to employ them, or to afford them an opportunity of rendering that service they themselves wish to give, or which perhaps is expected by the public. Their want [of knowledge] of our language is an objection to their being joined to any of the regi- ments here at this time, were there vacancies, and not other obstacles. These considerations induce me to wish that Congress would adopt and point out some particular mode to be observed respecting them. What it should be, they will be best able to determine. But to me it appears that their being here now can be attended with no valuable consequences, and that, as the power of appointing officers for the new army is vested in the conventions, &c., of the several States, it will be necessary for Congress to direct them to be provided for in the regiments to be raised, according to the ranks they would wish them to bear (or I am con- vinced they will never be taken in, let their merit be what it may), or to form them into a distinct corps, which may be increased in time. They seem to be genteel, sensible men; and I have no doubt of , their making good officers, as soon as they can learn as much of our language as to make themselves well understood; but, unless Congress interfere by their particular direction to the States, they will never be incorporated in any of the regiments to be raised, and, without they are, they will be entirely at a loss, and in the most irksome situation, for something to do, as they now are. I have the honor to be, &c., G. W. Head-Quarters, Morristown, Jany. 20, 1777 Sir : — I would beg leave to remark here, that, except we can throw the many foreigners, who have commissions in our army, into a corps together, they will be entirely useless, as they can neither converse with officers nor men in any other kind of regiment. ****** I am. Sir, &c., G. W, T O* 258 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS Head- Quarters, Morristown, February 20, 1 777. Sir;— I have often mentioned to you the distress I am every now and then laid under by the application of French officers for commissions in our service. This evil, if I may call it so, is a growing one ; for, from what I learn, they are coming in swarms from old France and the islands. There will, therefore, be a necessity for providing for them, or discoun- tenancing them. To do the first is difficult ; and the last, disagreeable, arid, perhaps, impolitic, if they are men of merit ; and it is impossible to distinguish these from mere adventurers, of whom, I am convinced, there are the greatest number. They seldom bring more than a com- mission and passport, which, we know, may belong to a bad, as well as to a good, officer. Their ignorance of our language, and their inability to recruit men, are insurmountable obstacles to their being ingrafted into our continental battalions ; for our officers, who have raised their men, and have served through the war upon pay that has hitherto not borne their expenses, would be disgusted if foreigners were put over their heads ; and, I as- sure you, few or none of these gentlemen look lower than field-officers' commissions. To give them all brevets, by which they have rank and draw pay without doing any service, is saddling the continent with a vast expense ; and to form them into corps would be only establishing corps of officers, for, as I have said before, they cannot possibly raise any men. Some general mode of disposing of them must be adopted, for it is ungenerous to keep them in suspense and at great charge to them- selves ; but I am at a loss how to point out this mode. Suppose they were told, in general, that no man could obtain a commission except he could raise a number of men in proportion to his rank ? This would effectually stop the mouths of common appliers, and would leave us at liberty to make provision for gentlemen of undoubted military character and merit, who would be very useful to us as soon as they acquired our language. If you approve of this, or can think of any better method, be pleased to inform me as soon as you possibly can ; for, if 1 had a decisive answer to give them, it would not only save me much trouble, but much time, which I am now obliged to bestow in hearing tlieir different pre- tensions to merit, and their expectations therefrom. I have the honor to be, &c., G. W. Head-Quarters, Middlebrook, June s, 1777. Sir:— I had, this morning, the honor of your letter of the fifth with its in- closures. The resolution of the 30th of May, respecting the French gentlemen who came passengers in the Amphitrite, reached me before OF BREVETS. 259 your letter, and has excited much uneasiness in the artillery corps. The inclosed copy of a letter from General Knox will convey their anxiety on the subject, which [copy] I think it necessary to transmit, as well from duty as on account of his request. The difficulties upon this occasion arise from the peculiar circum- stances of most of the officers composing the artillery regiments at this time. I do not know, for my own part, what operation Congress pre- cisely meant the resolution should have ; but if the commissions which these gentlemen are to receive should give them rank from the date of those they had from the King of France, or from the compact with Mr. Deane, there are but few officers now in the artillery who will not be superseded in their command, unless some method is adopted to prevent it. This, I am persuaded, Congress had not in contemplation, because it is opposed to policy and to justice ; and I am led to believe the reso- lution was come into for want of the information how matters were cir- cumstanced in this instance. The officers now in the artillery, I am obliged to consider of great merit. Experience has proved them to be most warmly attached to the rights of their country ; and their conduct in the line of their profes- sion has been such as does the highest honor to themselves and the gentleman who immediately commands them. Without derogating in the least from the character of the French officers who are to be com- missioned and whom I wish to receive every countenance they merit, there is strong reason to doubt (laying aside every consideration of policy) whether they have seen as much real service as our own in the course of two campaigns. It would be hard, not to say unjust, that the latter should lose their command, when they have a claim to every mark of favor, and after they have taken great pains to form their com- panies. The service requires that they should not ; and, I am convinced the event wQjild be attended with the most fatal consequences. But what is to be done ? This is a case of difficulty, view it as you will. I am not for rejecting the French gentlemen. Far otherwise. I am for employing them; and public faith and the encouragement given to bring them over demand that it should be done. After much thought and consideration upon the subject, two modes occur to me, as the only possible ones by which it can be effected, and by which the inconveniences I have mentioned can be remedied. One is, that a new corps of artillery should be formed and these gentlemen attached to it. This, we have reason to fear, cannot be done, from the difficulties we have experienced in raising men, and from their having no interest, or connections, with the people. Their situation, in such case, if they are men of sentiment, and active dispositions, would be irksome and dis- tressing. The other is, that our present officers, now under considera- tion, should have their commissions ante-dated to give them prece- dency of rank ; and this may be done with the greatest propriety, as most of them were intended to hold the posts they now sustain before the French gentlemen had any claim upon us. It is true, they were not commissioned, because the old corps existed under the first ar- rangement. Further, it is said — and there is no doubt of the fact — that these gentlemen were promoted by brevet, just before their de- parture from France, merely to give them rank here ; antecedent to 360 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS which, our officers were superior to them in this point; and these brevets only confer local rank, confined to the French-American colonies. This latter mode appears the most eligible. If it is adopted, they will be distributed through the corps as assistant officers. Their want of a knowledge in our language incapacitates them for command in the first instance ; and not only so, but to place them at the head of com- panies, over officers that have been at great trouble, pains and expense in raising the men, would be both unmilitary and unjust. I shall now quit the subject, wishing that whatever will best conciliate matters, and advance the public good, may be done ; suggesting, at 'the same time, with all deference, as it is much easier to prevent evils than to remedy them after they have happened, it will be well, in all cases of foreign, and, indeed, other, apphcations, that the consequences which granting them will involve, should be maturely weighed and taken in every point of view. In the present case of difficulty, things, I am persuaded, might have been adjusted with the greatest facility, had the committee of foreign applications been fully possessed of all the cir- cumstances respecting the artillery regiments. * * * » I have the honor to be, &c., G. W. , {To the committee of Congress on a visit to the Camp.') Camp at the Clove, July 19, 1777. Gentlemen : — ** »»***»# The consequences of giving rank indiscriminately are much to be dreaded. Great dissatisfaction has already arisen on account of bestowing this on officers in the civil departments of the army, on the inferior staff, wagon-masters, &c., who, by custom, propriety, and every other motive, are excluded from it in all well regulated armies. The too great liberality practised in this respect will destroy the pride of rank where it ought to exist, and will not only render it cheap, but contemptible. It is the policy of all armies to make it valued and' respected, as a stimulus to emulation and an incitement to bold and gallant undertakings. It must be very unadvisable, therefore, in our infant state of war, to adopt novel customs to bring it into discredit, which must and will be the consequence of makihg it too common, besides the disgust it creates in others. * * » * **** «»»»* I am exceedingly embarrassed how to dispose of the French officers, in general, but more especially the artillery officers who are come out under the sanction of a compact. I tan think of no other way than of forming a separate corps of them, and drafting men from the whole line to compose that corps ; but even this will be attended with many dis- agreeable effects. Among others, this is not the least, that officers will think themselves much injured lo' have -the menlhey have had the OF BREVETS. 26 1 trouble of raising taken from them and given to others. There is something in tliis which is discouraging and which breaks the spirit of a good officer, who prides himself in having a full and complete corps. **» *»#*#* I have the honor to be, &c., G. W. Head-Quarters, White Marsh, Deer. I, 1777. Sir:— In respect to promotions for merit and intrepidity, I would beg leave to observe that though these are proper considerations to found them upon, yet they should be made with the greatest caution and attention, and only in cases of the most eminent and distinguished services. Every promotion, or rise out of the common course, cannot fail to excite uneasiness in a greater or lesser degree ; and nothing will recon- cile them to the army at large, and particularly to the officers more immediately affected by them, but where the causes are known and acknowledged. This I mention, from my wishes to promote the public interest, from my knowing that harmony is essential to this end, and from no other motives whatever. * * » * * I have the honor to be, &c., G. W. Head-Quarters, January 13, 1778. Sir:— This will be delivered to you by the Chevalier De Mauduit du Plessis, who was among the first French officers that joined the army of the United States. The gallant conduct of this young gentleman at Brandywine, Germantown, and his distinguished services at Fort Mercer, where he united the offices of engineer and commandant of artillery, entitle him to the particular notice of Congress. He made several judiicous alterations in the works at Red Bank, showed great good con- duct during the action in which the Hessians were repulsed, and was spoken of, in consequence, in terms of the highest applause, by the commandingofficer of the post. After the evacuation was determined upon, he became the means of saving some valuable artillery and stores, and cheerfully undertook, as volunteer, the hazardous operation of blowing up the magazine, &c., without the apparatus usually provided upon such occasions. I must further add in Monsieur Du Plessis' favor, that he possesses a degree of modesty not always found in men who have performed brilliant actions. It is with pleasure, therefore, that I recommend it to Congress to grant him a brevet of lieutenant- colonel — a reward due to his merit, and which will not have the incon- venience of occasioning any dissatisfaction in the corps to which he belongs. As. some particular circumstances have prevented Monsieur Du Plessis from waiting upon Congress sooner, I hope there will be no difficulty in antedating the brevet, so that the recompense may more ramediately follow the services which he has done. At the same time, 262 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS that there may not be any uneasines"s on the part of Monsieur Fleury, whom Congress has been pleased to reward in the same way, and as their times of service are nearly equal in France, I would propose that Monsieur Du Plessis' brevet should bear the same date, viz. : the 26th of November. I have the honor to be, &c., G. W. Camp near Brunswick, July 7th, 1778. Sir:— * * * * I shall be extremelyhappy if the com- mittee appointed to arrange the army would repair to it as soon as possible. Congress can form no adequate idea of the discontents prevailing on account of the unsettled state of rank, and the uncertainty in which officers are as to their future situation. The variety of hands in which the power of granting commissions and filling up vacancies is lodged, and other circumstances, have occasioned frequent instances of younger officers commanding theirseniors, from the fact of the former having received their commissions and the latter not; and these not only in the line of the army at large, but in their own brigades and even in their own regiments. This, it will readily be conceived, is neces- sarily productive of much confusion, altercation and complaint, and requires the speediest remedy. I have the honor to be, etc., G. W. Head-Quarters, White Plains, Aug. 3d, 1778. Sir :— It is not without reluctance that I am constrained to renew my impor- tunities on the subject of the committee of arrangements. The present unsettled state of the army is productive of so much dissatisfaction and confusion, and of such a variety of disputes, that almost the whole of my time is now employed in finding temporary and inadequate expedients to quiet the minds of the officers, and keep business on a tolerable sort of footing. Not an hour passes without new applications and new com- plaints about rank ; and, for want of a proper adjustment of this and many other essential points, our affairs are in a most irksome and injurious train. We can scarcely form a court-martial, or parade a detachment, in any instance, without a warm discussion on the subject of prece- dence ; and there are several good officers now who are forced to decline duty, to pi-event disputes ; and their being commanded by others who, upon evei-y principle, are their inferiors, unless their having obtained commissions before them (from the opportunities they had of making earlier applications, from local circumstances), should be considered sufficient to give them a superior claim. * * » I have the honor to be, etc., G. W. OF BREVETS. 263 In February, 1751, on the second reading of the mutiny bill, a debate arose on the clause respecting the half-pay officers, in which Sir George Lyttleton (afterwards Lord Lyttleton) made a long speech in support of it. Among the many arguments urged in support of the clause, he observed that the great point, which had been the subject of so much eager altercation, this terrible clause, about which such alarms had been given — alarms that had spread from the army to the navy, as if it threatened no less than the enslaving of both — was in truth no more than saying that an officer is an officer, and not a mere civil man ; that he who receives the king's pay cannot be supposed to be out of his service ; and that he who is in the king's service may be commanded to serve hiin when occasion requires, and cannot be wholly exempt from that military discipline which the necessity of the service de- mands. These are all the propositions contained in this clause, and which of them can be denied ? It is supposing a government to be out of its senses, to suppose that it could give half-pay to officers in the manner we give it, if you do not consider it as a retainer, and as an obligation to serve ; for, had the half-pay been given purely and simply as a reward for past services, it would then have been given only to veterans, or to such officers as had eminent merit to plead. Is this the case ? We know the contrary. We know it is given to many who, in the meritorious sense of the word, have not served at all. It must, therefore, be considered as an obligation to serve, not as an exemption from service, in the general purpose and view with which it was given ; but, if itbenota totalexemption from service, then there can be nothing more absurd than to suppose there is a total exemption from discipline, where there is not a total exemption from service. Indeed (continued Sir George Lyttleton) there are some parts of military discipline, from which an officer, when on half-pay, will be exempt, not from any discharge from the service, but by his situation. They cannot have the same operation upon one living retired at his own house in the country, as upon one doing duty in a camp or a garrison ; nor would they have it, though he were in full-pay, so long as he remained in that retreat ; but, so far as discipline can operate upon him in such a situation, it certainly does ; because he is an officer, because he still retains his commission by which he was first subjected to discipUne, and not only receives the wages of government, not only retains the' rank he had, but may be promoted from the degree of a colonel to that of a field-marshal. While he has all these emoluments derived from the service, is it not reasonable, is it not fitting, that he should be bound by its laws ? Where is the hardship of this, where is the injustice, where is the servitude ? It is unaccountable that an officer should complain of the loss of freedom, of being reduced to the condition of a slave and a janizary, because, while he receives but half- 264 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS pay, he still continues subject to 'the same law which he is willing to live under to its utmost extent when he is in full-pay. Is not this, in effect, to declare, that the difference between freedom and slavery may be made up and compensated to him, by the difference between full- pay and half-pay ? But the ofBcers of our army have more generous sentiments. Good laws, says Machiavel, must be maintained by good arms, and good arms by good discipline. It is a very just maxim, which no government should forget. Late experience has shown us, that, if we had not had good arms and good discipline, our good laws would have been lost ; and a very different system of laws, both civil and military, would have been dictated to us by. Highland legislators, and renegade Englishmen dressed in their liveries.* It is to this army, it is to this discipline, of which such terrors are conceived, that we owe delivery from slavery in its most abject and loathsome form. Therefore the maintaining this discipline, the not suffering it to be relaxed and corrupted in time of peace, is essentially necessary to the safety of the whole constitution ; and tliey who are friends to the one will be friends to the other. The bill was ordered to be committed to a committee of the whole house. It appears that the clause had, in many subsequent mutiny acts, been entirely omitted ; and in April, 1785, the court-martial appointed to try General Ross (respecting a letter written by him reflecting on General Boyd) met, agreeably to their adjournment, to receive the opinion of the twelve Judges of England, on the point submitted to them, viz. : — whether General Ross, as an officer on half-pay, was subject to the tribunal of a court-martial .'' The Judges gave an unanimous opinion, that he was not as a half-pay officer subject to military law. They stated their answer on two points, and in both declared it as their opinion, that neither his warrant as a general officer, nor his annuity of half-pay, rendered him obnoxious to military trial. In consequence of this, the general was discharged Irom the custody of the marshal, and the court broke up. The decision of the Judges in this case was highly interesting, not only to military men in particular; but to the peojjle of England in general. If it had been the opinion of the Judges, that officers discharged from the army on half-pay were amenable to military law. and that their half-pay was not only a reward for past services, but a retaining fee for future, then the crown would have been invested with a standing army, which, in any contention with the subject, might be called forth without the authority of parliament. In March, 1786, an alteration, introduced into the mutiny bill, for the purpose of subjecting officers who held commissions by brevet to military law, was strongly opposed in both Houses of Parliament. The earliest mutiny bills included every officer " mustei'ed or in- pay as an officer or on half-pay;" but, after the year 1751, the latter part of the clause was omitted. In the bill brought in March, 1786, instead of the word mustered, the word commissioned was inserted ; by which altera- * This part of Sir George Lyttleton's speech alludes to the fcishion taken up at the period,, by all the Jacobites in England, o£ wearing Scotch plaids for their waistcoats as a party dis- tinction. OF BREVETS. 265 tion, all those officers who had commissions by brevet, although out of the service, were made subject to the regulations of this act. The general ground on which this alteration was supported by the Secretary at War, and by the Chancellor of the Exchequer (Mr. Pitt), was, that though such officers received no pay from the Crown, yet, as tliey might possibly be invested with command, it was necessary they should be rffede subject to be tried by courts-martial, in case of misbe- havior while in command ; and that there were also many other military officers, who were not mustered, such as governors, lieutenant- governors, etj., who might eventually exercise command ; and that it was highly reasonable that they should, on that account, become accountable to military law ; and, as a proof of the expediency of the measure proposed, an instance which had lately occurred was mentioned. Colonel Stewart, a major-general by brevet in the East Indies, had, in that quality, taken upon himself to command the army in the settlement in which he was upon service ; and had nevertheless not been deemed liable to be tried by a court-martial, had any part of his conduct required that he should be tried. General Burgoyne, Colonel Fitzpatrick, and other members in oppo- sition, urged, in objection to the clause, that the whole system of mar- tial law, as it infringed upon the. natural and constitutional rights of the subject, was only defensible upon the strict ground of necessity ; and ought, therefore, in times of peace more especially, to be narrowed, if possible, instead of being extended ; that the general principle, as recognized both in the theory and practice of our Constitution, was that the mihtary law should be confined to actual military service alone ; that, in ancient times, when every man bore arms, and was liable to be called forth, military law was exercised upon every man while he was in actual service, but no longer ; that, in our times, the militia were under mihtary law when embodied in a militia, but were freed from it, after they returned into the mass of the people, and the character of the soldier was sunk in that of the citizen ; that the officers on half-pay, though at first included in the mutiny act, had been exempted from its operation by the dehberate voice of both Houses of Parliament — cir- cumstances which clearly proved that the prevalent idea, in all ages, had been to confine military law to actual military service. It was further urged, that there was a peculiar hardship and injustice in subjecting men in civil life, and who derived no emolument from the rank which they held in the army, to be tried by courts-martial, not only for offences at this time known and defined in the articles of war to be military offences, but for offences as yet unknown, which His Majesty had the power hereafter to create ; that the act expressly or- dered that the articles of war should be read twice in every month, at the head of every regiment in the army ; that this measure was doubt- less thought necessary for the purpose of making them familiarly known to all who were liable to be affected by them, and was, therefore, a clear proof that the mutiny act, under which the King derives his authority to make such articles of war as he pleased, was never designed to be ex- tended to brevet officers, or officers on half-pay ; and that, at least, if the innovation proposed should be persisted in, those gentlemen should be apprised of their being about to be made subject to trial by courts- 266 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS martial for a variety of offences, which, at present, in their civil situa- tion, were not offences. In addition to these arguments, it was also remarked that the pre- amble to the mutiny act confined the standing army to a limited num- ber of men, to be paid by the public ; and that the proposed alteration would falsify the preamble, by enabling the Executive Government to exercise military authority over an additional body of men, not in the pay of the public. In fine, both Houses were called upon not to allow that jealousy to be laid asleep with which Parliament, ever since a standing army in peace was first suffered to exist, had always regarded it ; and to take care lest, under pretence of providing against fanciful inconveniences, they did not connive at a serious attack upon the most important principles of the Constitution. In the House of Lords, the bill was opposed, in two subsequent de- bates, with great eloquence and ability, by the Earl of Carlisle, Lord Stormont, and Lord Loughborough ; the first of whom proposed, in order to obviate the difficulty of a brevet officer's succeeding to command, without being amenable to military law, that a clause should be added, enacting that brevet officers should not take command except by virtue of a letter of service, or some special commission from His Majesty. This proposal not being accepted. Lord Stormont moved that, instead of the word " commissioned," these words should be inserted ; " mus- tered, or called by proper authority, into service." This amendment, he conceived, would do away the objections entertained against the proposed innovation, and would surely comprehend all that the Execu- tive Government could possibly desire. The clause, as originally framed, was defended by the Lord Chan- cellor, chiefly on the ground that all the King's forces, however consti- tuted, ought to be subject to the same laws ; that the distinction between an officer by brevet out of service, and an officer in actual service, was an unfair distinction With respect to the latter. If gentlemen chose to have the advantage of military rank, they ought to hold it on the con- dition of being subject to military law ; and, if they disliked that con- dition, they must ease themselves of the grievance, by resigning their commissions. This argument introduced another topic of discussion. It was asked whether an officer might not, in actual service, give up his commission whenever he pleased ? It was answered by Lord Lotighborough, that such a resignation was subject to His Majesty's acceptance ; and in this opinion the Lord Chancellor concurred, but added that no minister, under the circumstances described, could advise His Majesty not to accept such a resignation. On the division, there appeared for the original clause, 42 ; against it, 20. Consequently, it is now the estab- lished law, that officers, holding brevet commissions, are amenable to the jurisdiction of military courts-martial.* *See P.irliamentary Debates and Annual Re^^ister for 1786. — (From McArthur on Courts- Martial. ) OF BREVETS. 267 G. War Office, 1st December, 1871. The following Royal Warrant, Regulations, and Instructions are pro- mulgated to the Army by direction of the Secretary of State for War : Royal Warrant Regulating First Appoint- \ 30th October, MENTS, Regimental Promotion, Exchanges, &c. | 1871. (issued as a special army circular on 1ST NOVEMBER, 187I.) Victoria R. Whereas, by Our Warrant of the 20th July, 1871, We Clause 207. deemed it expedient to cancel and determine, on and after the 1st day of November in this present year, all Regula- tions made by Us or any of Our Royal predecessors, or any Officers acting under Our authority, regulating or fixing the prices at which any Commissions in Our forces may be purchased, sold, or exchanged, or in any way authorizing the purchase, or sale, or exchange for money of such com- missions ; Our Will and Pleasure is that the undermentioned articles of Our Warrant of 27th December, 1870, be can- celled accordingly, viz. : — Articles 33 (Paragra!ph a), 36 (Paragraph a), so much of Article 40 as relates to Regimental Promotion, Articles 44, 4S, 46, 47, 48. 49> S2, 53, 54. 55, 56, 61, 62, 63, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 102, 109, 959, 961, 967, 968, 969, 970. And whereas it is expedient, pending a more complete revision of that Section of Our said Warrant of the 27th of December, 1870, which now governs the promotion of Combatant Officers, to provide at once for certain neces- sary changes in respect of First Appointments, Regimental Promotion, and Exchanges ; Our Will and Pleasure is that this Warrant be established and obeyed from the ist day of November in this present year, in respect of all matters herein contain- ed, and that it be construed, administered, and interpreted with Our said Warrant of 27th December, 1870. y^'^ii 268 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS Clause 207. I. FIRST APPOINTMENTS. (Continued^ „ ^ Sub-Lieutenants. Appointment. I. A Commission as Sub-Lieutenant in Our army may be given : — (a) To a successful candidate at a Competitive Ex- amination in general subjects to be held under such Regulations as may be issued from time to time by Our Secretary of State. (6) To a Student from the University of Oxford, Cambridge, Durham, London, Dublin, Edinburgh, St. Andrew's, Glasgow, Aberdeen, or the Queen's University, Ireland, who has passed "Responsions " at Oxford, the " Previous Examination " at Cam- bridge, or the Corresponding Examination at the other Universities, under .such regulations with re- spect to the age and manner of selection of such can- didates as may be issued from time to time by Our Secretary of State. (c) To Our Cadets styled " Queen's Cadets ; " to those styled " Indian Cadets ; " and to Our Pages of Hon- or. These Cadets and Pages of Honor shall pass such a qualifying examination in general subjects as may be fixed from time to time by Our Secretary of State. (d) To a Non-Commissioned Officer who is recom- mended for promotion by Our Commander-in-Chief, and who shall pass such a professional examination as may be fixed from time to time by Our Secretary of State. Qualification for 2. Sub-Lieutenants, in order to qualify for the rank of rank o£ Lieut. Lieutenant, shall be required to serve satisfactorily for twelve months with one of Our Regiments, and after such service (except in the case of Non-commissioned Officers promoted to be Sub-Lieutenants), to go through such a course of study, and to pass such a professional examina- tion, as may be fixed from time to time by Our Secretary of State. Removal from j Sub-Lieutenants shall be removed from Our Service "" ■ for moral or physical unfitness, or if they fail to pass sat- isfactorily through the prescribed course of study. They shall, except in the case of Non-commissioned Officers pro- moted to be Sub-Lieutenants, be required to pass the pro- fessional examination for the rank of Lieutenant within three years, failing to do which they shall be removed Service towards from Our Service. Their time for retirement on full or retoement. half-pay shall be reckoned from the date of their Commis- sions as Lieutenants ; and in fixing the date of such Com- missions, such portion of their service as Sub-Lieutenants may be allowed as their conduct and qualifications may OF BREVETS. 269 merit, according to Regulations to be issued from time to S^*"!?^°J, time by Our Secretary of State. _ "" """ 4. Sub-Lieulenants appointed to a Cavalry Regiment Transfer from who are not qualified for service in the Cavalry may be SkntTyl" transferred to the Infantry. Appointment from the Militia. 5. A Commission as Lieutenant in Our Army may be Militia Lleuten- given to a Lieutenant of one of Our Regiments of Militia *°'^' under such Regulations as to age or otherwise as may be issued from time to time by Our Secretary of State. The Officer shall pass a profe,ssional examination similar to that which will be required of a Sub-Lieutenant in Our Army before he receives a Commission as Lieutenant. IL PROMOTION. Lieutenants. 6. A Sub-Lieutenant in Our Army may receive a Com- mission as Lieutenant. Lieutenants. {a) If he has been promoted to the rank of Sub- Lieutenant from the rank of Non-commissioned Ofiicer, after a satisfactory service of not less than 12 months as a Sub-Lieutenant. (b) In the case of other Sub-Lieutenants, after a satis- factory service of not less than 12 months with one of Our Regiments, and after having gone through a course of study and passed a professional examina- tion, as laid down in article 2. Captains. 7. A qualified Lieutenant shall be eligible for promotion Promotion to to the rank of Captain after two years service in Our Army. ^^ ^"' . In the case of officers entering our army after the 26th August, 1871, this service shall dSte from the date of their Commissions as Lieutenants ; in the case of other Officers from the date of their first Commissions. Majors. 8. A qualified Captain shall be eligible for promotion to Promotion to the rank of Major after six years service in Our Army. In *'^Jo''- the case of Officers entering Our Army after the 26th August, 1871, this service shall date from the date of their Commissions as Lieutenants ; in the case of other Officers from the date of their first Commissions. 270 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS Clause 207. LlEUTENANT-COLONELS. {Continued-) Promotion to 9- A qualified Officer holding the substantive rank of Lieut.-Colonel. Major shall be eligible for promotion to the rank of Lieutenant-Colonel. General Rules. 10. Every promotion shall be made upon the recom- mendation of Our Commander-in-Chief, with the approval of Our Secretary of State. Succession to 1 1- Successiou to Vacancies shall be regulated as vacancies. folloWS : — (a.) If a vacancy shall arise — (i.) By the promotion of an Officer to the rank of Major-General, (2.) By the death of an Officer, (3.) By an Officer becoming Supernumerary under Article 21, or {4.) By an Officer being promoted to fill a vacan- cy in another Regiment or Corps, the promotions in the several ranks necessary to fill the vacancy shall — unless it be expedient that the vacancies be otherwise filled — ^be given to the senior qualified Officer of each lower rank in the Regiment or Corps, except in case of promotion to be Lieuten- ant-Colonel, in which case the vacancy shall be filled by a qualified Officer to be selected by Our Com- mander-in-Chief, with the approval of Our Secretary of State. (b.) If a vacancy shall arise from any other cause, it shall be filled by a qualified Officer of Our Army, who shaU be selected by Our Commander-in-Chief, with the approval of Our Secretary of State. 12. No selection shall be made in succession to any vacancy caused by the retirement of an Officer until such retirement shall have been completed and shall have appeared in the London Gazette. Bxamination for 1 3- Officers below the' rank of Field Officer shall not be promotion, recommended to Us for promotion, unless they shall have previously passed such professional examinations as may be fixed from time to time by Our Secretary of State. Officers serving with their Regiments at distant Foreign Stations may be | provisionally promoted to vacancies previous to passing such examination, but such promotion shall be cancelled should the Officer fail in his examina- tion. Captains now in Our Service may be appointed Majors without examination if specially reported to and approved by Our Commander-in-Chief, as having proved their efficiency for the rank of Major. 14. Lieutenants shall be required to pass the profes- OF BREVETS. 2/ 1 sional examination for the rank of Captain within five Clause 207. years from the date of their Commission as Lieutenants, (izantinMd.) failing to do which they shall be removed from Our Ser- vice, and may receive a sum not exceeding one year's pay ; provided, that in cases of exigency Our Secretary of State may enlarge the time allowed for their examination. Officers now in Our Service who received their first com- missions before the 26th day of August, 1871, shall not be liable to the provisions of this article. III. TENURE OF APPOINTMENTS OF MAJOR AND LIEUTENANT-COLONELS IN A REGI- MENT. I J. The appointment of Major in a regiment or Battal- Major. ion shall, in the case of Officers so appointed after the date of the warrant, be held in the first instance for five years ; the Officer being eligible for re-appointment. If not re-appointed he shall receive half-pay. 16. The appointment of Lieutenant-Colonel of a Regiment Lieut-Colonel, or Battalion shall in the case of Officers so appointed after the date of this Warrant, be held in the first instance for five years, and may be renewed if it appears to Our Com- mander-in-Chief, with the approval of Our Secretary of State, that such renewal is desirable for the good of Our Service. If the officer be not re-appointed, he shall receive half-pay. IV. ROYAL ARTILLERY OF ENGINEERS. 17. The foregoing Articles of this Warrant, viz.. Articles I to 16, shall not apply to Our Royal Artillery or Royal Engineers. V. EXCHANGES. 18. Subject to the sanction of our Commander-in-Chief Exchanges be- Officers of equal substantive rank on full-pay, serving in tween officers Our Cavalry, Infantry of the Line and Colonial Corps, and °°'""-P^y- Officers (below the substantive rank of Field Officer) in Our Indian Staff Corps, may exchange from one Regiment or Corps to another, and Officers of equal substantive rank on full-pay serving in Brigades of Royal Artillery, in Compa- nies of Royal Engineers, or in Regiments of more than one Battalion, may exchange from one Brigade, Company of Royal Engineers, or Battalion, to another ; provided that the Commanding Officers of the Officers exchanging certify that the desired exchange does not originate in any cause affecting the honor, character, or professional efficiency of the Officers, and provided also that a certificate of a Military Medical Officer be transmitted in each case, declaring that 2/2 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS Clause 207. the Officer is in a fit state to serve at the station where the (Continued) Corps, Brigade, Battalion, or Company into which he applies on mue .) ^^ exchange is quartered. Each Officer shall also declare that it is his bona fide intention to join immediately and do duty in the Corps, Brigade, Battalion, or Company to which he proposes to exchange ; and no Officer shall be permitted to retire within six months of the date of his exchange, ex- cepting in the case of ill-health or other emergency, which / shall be specially considered. Expenses of ex- 19- An Officer SO exchanging shall be permitted to defray changes. all fair and reasonable expenses incurred through such ex- change by the officer with whom he exchanges, provided that the sum to be paid be approved by Our Commander- in-Chief before payment is made. Exchanging 20. An Officer exchanging into a Regiment shall be ftetottomrf placed, for Regimental seniority, below all Officers holding the list. the same Regimental rank at the time of his exchange. VT. SUPERNUMERARY OFFICERS. When to here- 21. An Officer may be retained on the strength of his tained super- Regiment Or Corps as a Supernumerary : — numerary. ^^^^ j^ ^^^^ ^j a reduction in the establishment of a Regiment or Corps when his retention is author- ized by Our Secretary of State ; 2d. If, in the case of a Field Officer belonging to a Regiment or Battalion serving in India, he be ap- pointed to a Brigade command, or to a Staff situa- tion in that country tenable by a Regimental Officer for the usual period of five years ; 3d. When appointed to be^ (3.) Assistant-Adjutant and Quartermaster-General, if a substantive Major ; (b.) Profe.isor, Instructor, or other Officer on the establishment of Our Royal Military College, Royal Military Academy, or Staff College ; {c.) Garrison ■ Instructor, Deputy Assistant Adjutant- General for Musketry, Captain Instructor or Lieu- tenant instructor of Musketry ; id.) Adjutant in a Regiment or Corps of Our auxiliary forces ; Or to hold such other appointments as may be fixed from time to time by Our Secretary of State with the approval of the Lords commissioners of Our Treasury. Position of super- 22. An Officer supernumerary to the establishment of his numeraries. Rg^i^jent or Corps shall retain his military position, and be leigible for promotion precisely as if he had remained on the active list of such Regiment or Corps. Supernumerary 23. A Supernumerary Officer under Article 21, on being OF BREVETS. 2/3 - omoted to a Lieutenailt-Coloflelcy or Majority in a Regi- g-omoted to ment or Corps, shall join the Regiment or Corps to which Lt?Sw!cy he may be promoted. or Majority, 24. A Supernumerary Officer who completes the term of.'Position of Sup- service fixed for his appointment, or resigns it on satisfac- emumerary on tory grounds, shall rejoin his Regiment as Supernumerary ^"^"^ ^resigul' in his rank, except in the case of a substantive Major, who tiooofappoim- shall receive half-pay until absorbed, retaining his regi- ™=,|" °"' '■^"'°- mental position. 25. A Supernumerary Officer who resigns his appointment on unsatisfactory grounds, or is displaced therefrom for misconduct or incapacity, unless he be removed from Our Army, shall receive a reduced rate of half-pay of such amount and for such period as Our Secretary of State may decide, taking into consideration the length and character of the services rendered by the Officer. 26. If a Supernumerary Officer shall die, be promoted, orpromotioninsuc- retire, or if an Officer of the rank in which there is a Super- cession to sup- numerary Officer waiting absorption under Article 24 shall cers.'"^'^'^° die, be promoted, or retire, no promotion shall take place in succession to such vacancy. 27. Cases of reduction of establishment shall be specially considered, and such arrangements made for the gradual absorption of Supernumerary Officers as maybe approved by the Lords Commissioners of Our Treasury. VII. PROVISIONAL ARRANGEMENTS. 28. Cornets and Ensigns in Our Army appointed before Provisional the 26th day of August, 1871, and Cornets and Ensigns in arrangements. Our Army appointed after such date who passed from Our Royal Military College on the A. list, may be promoted at once to the rank of Lieutenant. No greater number of Lieutenants than that allowed by the establishment, which may be fixed for the year, shall receive Lieutenant's pay; and no Officer shall receive such pay until he shall have passed the examination required by the existing regulations or the rank of Lieutenant. 29. Other Comets and Ensigns in Our Army, appointed after the 26th day of August, 1871, candidates who have passed the examination for direct commissions before the date of this Our Warrant, candidates for commissions in the Household Cavalry and Foot Guards, who are nomi- nated to fill the vacancies which occur in such regiments previous to the date of the first competitive examination for Sub-Lieutenancies and who pass a quahfying examina- tion, and candidates from the Universities now on the list of Our Commander-in-Chief, may receive commissions as Sub-Lieutenants. 30. Such Sub-Lieutenants as have passed satisfactorily through a course of study at Our Royal Military College may 13 274 HISTORY AND LEGAL EFFECTS Clause 207. be promoted to the rank of Lieutenant after twelve months' (Catuhttud.) satisfactory service with one of Our Regiments. Given at Our Court at Balmoral this 30th day of October, 1871, in the 3Sth year of Our Reign. By Her Majesty's Command, Edward Cardwell. ClAU!>E 20S. EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM TO ACCOM- PANY THE ROYAL WARRANT OF 30th OCTOBER, 1871. (ISSUED IN A SPECIAL ARMY CIRCULAR ON 1ST NOVEM- BER, 1871.) 1. The scope of the piresent Warrant is confined to mak- ing those changes which are rendered immediately neces- sary by the abolition of Purchase, and it therefore deals only with the subjects of First Appointments, Regimental Promotion in the Cavalry and Infantry of the Line, and Ex- changes, 2. Questions affecting the Household Cavalry and Foot Guards are under the consideration of Her Majesty's Gov- ernment, and the promotions which have heretofore car- ried superior Army rank are for the time to be suspended. 3. The Regnlations which are required for the purpose of carrying into effect the provisions of the Warrant are either pnblisbed along with it, or are in course of prepara- tion, and wilt be issued shortly. 4. In the mean time, the following explanatory statement has been drawn ijp for general information. 5. Commissions as Lieutenants will be given to all Cor- nets and Ensigns appointed before 26th August, 1 871, and to Cornets and Ensigns appointed since that date from the A. List at Sandhurst, their Commissions to date from ist November. 6. Commissions as Sub-Lieutenants wHI be given to — {m) All other Comets and Ensigns appointed after 26th August, 1871, the rank of Comet and Ensign being abolished ; (^) Candidates who have passed the examination for Direct Commissions, in their torn as vacancies occur ; («■) Candidates for Commissions in the Household Cavalry and Foot Guards who are nominated to fill the vacancies which occur in those regiments before the date of the first competitive examination for Sub- Lieutenancies, and who pass a qualifying examina- tion; {d\ Candidates from the Universities now on the Com- mander-in-Chief's list. OF BREVETS. 2/5 7. Sub-Lieutenants will be attached for a year to regi- Clause 208. ments at home. They will then be required to go through {cimtimud^ a course of instruction, and on passing a practical profes- sional examination, be commissioned to Regiments as Lieu- tenants. They will be under strict discipline, and will be liable to be removed for unfitness, either moral or physical, and for misconduct. Those unsuited to the Cavalry may be transferred to the Infantry. 8. In dating their commissions they will be allowed a portion, not exceeding one year, of their service as sub- lieutenants ; the time allowed being determined by the class of certificate they receive after their year's regimental training, their conduct while under instruction, and their position at the final examination. Their service for re- tirement will reckon from the date of their commissions as lieutenants. 9. Candidates who have passed the examination for di- rect commissions, and have also passed satisfactorily through a year's course of study at the Royal Military College before being appointed to be sub-lieutenants, and Sandhurst Cadets from the B. list, will be commissioned to regiments as lieutenants on serving satisfactorily for twelve months with a regiment as sub-lieutenants. 10. There are now a large number of supernumerary officers, and also a large number of candidates who have passed for commissions. 11. The absorption of supernumerary officers will prob- ably be completed, and the candidates who have passed for commissions have received their appointments, in about two years from the present time, and first appoint- ments in the army will then only be given as follows : — (a) To successful candidates at a competitive examina- tion; (b) To non-commissioned officers recommended for promotion by the field marshal commanding-in-chief ; {c) To candidates from the universities ; (d) To Queen's Cadets, Indian Cadets, and Pages of Honor ; (/) To lieutenants of Militia. 12. The competitive examination will be carried out by the civil service commissions ; the standard qualifica- tion being that recommended by the Royal commission on military education. Ample notice will be given of the first examination, and there will be no advantage in anv appli- cations being made for admission to be examined' before the publication of such notice. 13. Non-commissioned officers, on being selected for promotion, will pass an examination in certain professional subjects ; and then after 12 months' satisfactory service as sub-lieutenants, will receive commissions as lieutenants. 14- A certain number of sub-lieutenancies a year will 2/6 HISTORY And legal effects Clause zo8. be allotted to candidates who have passed the university (Continued) examination specified in the regulations. If they also pass the examination for the degree of B. A., they will be allowed two years' extension of the limit of age. Univer- sity candidates will be required to give at least six months' notice of their desire to be admitted into the army. If in any year there should be more candidates than appoint- ments, the requisite number will be chosen by competition between the candidates; after their appointment they will go through the same course as other sub-lieutenants. 15. There will be no vacancies for two years for any candidates from the universities whose names are not now on the commander-in-chief's list. 16. Queen's and Indian Cadets and Queen's Pages will be required to pass a qualifying examination, which for the present will be the same as that recommended by the royal commission on military education. The nominations will remain as heretofore. When appointed, cadets and pages will go through the same course as other sub-lieu- tenants. 17. First appointments as subalterns in the militia will be made on the recommendation of the lieutenants of counties. Candidates, before receiving their commissions as heutenants in the militia, will be required to pass a qualifying examination in general subjects equal to the standard fixed as necessary for a candidate for a sub- lieutenancy. They will next be required to be attached to a regiment of the line for three months, or such time as may be necessary to teach them their drill. After serving with their militia regiments for two annual trainings, they will be eligible for the appointment of lieutenants in the army. In order to obtain such an appointment, they must be recommended by the commanding officer of their mihtia regiment, this recommendation being confirmed by the general officer commanding the district, and they will be required to pass an examination in professional subjects of the same kind as that which will be required of a sub- lieutenant before he receives his commission as lieuten- ant. 18. The limits of age, except for non-commissioned officers, will be fixed at from 17 to 20 for sub-lieutenants, the limit being raised to 22 in the case of candidates who have passed their examination for the degree of B. A. at the Universities, and from 19 to 22 for lieutenants from the militia. 19. So far as it is possible to calculate beforehand, the vacancies on the present establishment of officers in the army will provide for about 200 admissions a year by competition, and for one commission a year for each militia regiment of 10 companies, and for the smaller regi- ments in proportion, besides the number allowed for OF BREVETS. 277 candidates from the universi^es, non-commissioned offi- Clause 208. cers, &C. {Continued.) 20. In addition to tlie examinations hitherto required from regimental officers, those who are promoted to the ranlc of captain after the 1st of November will, before being promoted to the rank of Major, be required to pass a professional examination. 21. The necessary alterations in the Queen's regula- tions, with respect to this and other examinations, will be made public as soon as possible. 22. Adjutancies of the auxiliary forces will in future be filled by half-pay officers, or by officers belonging to regi- ments who will be made supernumerary to their regiments while so serving. The appointments will be held in the first instance for a term of five years ; but if the officer's service prove unsatisfactory, they will be liable to be sent back to their regiments, or put on a reduced rate of half- pay, under Article 25 of the warrant, at any time ; if satisfactory, they will be eligible for reappointment after the expiration of their first period. 23. It is not intended to interpose any obstacle in the way of exchanges between officers on full-pay, which are made to suit the reasonable convenience of officers. It is therefore provided that an officer wishing to exchange, shall be permitted to defray the fair and reasonable expenses of the officer with whom he exchanges, provided that the sum to be paid is approved by the commander-in- chief. Precautions have been taken in the Queen's reg- ulations for the army, to guard against any abuse of such arrangements. REGISTER. BREVETS CONFERRED FROM 1776 TO 1812. 3Sr ^A.3VtES. ALLAIN. January 13, 1779. The Board of Wa.t report, that the following named French gentlemen, having served as volunteers in Col. Armand's corps, with much reputation, as appears by the certificate of Col. Arraand, and tho rec- ommendations of the Marquis de la Fayette and others, are about to return to France, and therefore recommend that brevets be granted them, under the exceptions in the Resolution against granting brevets, except to officers in the line, or in cases of merit, viz., to Monsieur AUain * * « * the brevet of Lieutenant. Resolved. That Congress agree to said report. Resolved. That the sum of 400 dollars be paid to each of these gentlemen to enable them to prosecute their voyage to France. ALLEN, ETHAN. May 14, 1778. Resolved, That a brevet commission of colonel be granted to Ethan Allen, in reward of his firmness, fortitude and zeal in the cause of his country, manifested during the course of his long and cruel captivity, as well as on former occasions. September 24, 1778. Wherez^s Congress did, on the 14th of May last, grant to Ethan Allen the rank of colonel by brevet in the army of the United States of America, in reward of his fortitude, firmness and zeal in the cause of his country, manifested during the course of his long and cruel captivity, as well as on former occasions ; and whereas, on the i6th day of the same month, all the benefits and privileges of lieutenant-colonel in the service of these States were granted to the said Ethan Allen during the time of his late captivity ; and whereas it is represented to Congress that Colonel E. Allen's circumstances have been greatly reduced by his late long and cruel confinement, and his bre- vet commission does not entitle him to pay. Resolved, That 75 dollars per month be allowed to Colonel E. Allen from 280 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM the date of his brevet, during the pleasure of Congress, or until he shall be called into active service. ARCHER, JOHN. June 26, 1779. Resolved, That the brevet of captain be given to Mr. Archer, the bearer of the general's letter, and volunteer aid to Brig.-Gen'l. Wayne. BEAULIEU. September 30, 1783. Resolved, That Lieutenant Beaulieu be promoted to the rank of captain by brevet in the army of the U. S. BRICE. October 27, 1778. Resolved, That Mr. Brice, A.D.C. to the Marquis de la Fayette, be promoted to the rank of lieutenant -colonel by brevet in the service of the U. S. BRIFFAULT. January 13, 1779. Resolved, That Congress agree to said report (cited in the case of Allain, and which recommends that the brevet of lieutenant be also granted to Monsieur Briffault). Resolved, That the sum of 400 dollars be paid to each of these (French) gentlemen to enable them to prosecute their voyage to France. January 15, 1786. Resolved, That Mgnsieur Briffault, who, on the 13th of January, 1779, was appointed to the brevet rank of lieutenant in the army of the U. S., receive a commission of lieutenant in Col. Armand's corps, to bear the date of his brevet. CAMBRAY. May 2, 1783. Resolved, That Lieutenant-Colonel Cambray, of the corps of engineers, be promoted to the rank of colonel by brevet. CAPITAINE. November 5, 1778. Resolved, That the commission of major by brevet be granted to Monsieur Capitaine, a captain in the service of the U. S., and that a bill of exchange for 2400 "livres tournois " be drawn on the muster of the United States in favor of Monsieur Capitaine, for his expenses in coming to and returning from America. DE BEDAUX, FREDERICK. September 15, 1777. Resolved, That Monsieur Frederick de Bedaux be, appointed a captain by brevet, and receive the pay and rations annexed to that rank, from the loth of May last. DE BERT. February 6, 1784. Resolved, That the commission of major by brevet be issued to Captain de Bert. 17/6 TO 1812. 281 DE BOIS, PIERRE FRANCOIS. October 7, 1776. Resolved, That Monsieur Pierre Franfois de Bois be commissioned a major by brevet, and sent to General Mercer to be employed in such way as he shall think proper. DE BRAHM. 1 Februarv 6, 1784. Resolved, That a brevet commission of lieutenant- colonel be issued to Major de Brahm, of the late corps of engineers, and that he be informed that his further services are dispensed with. DE COLERUS, CHRISTIAN. September 19, 1776. Resolved, That Monsieur Christian de Colerus be appointed to the rank and pay of a major by brevet, and that his commission be forthwith given him. DE CORNEY, LOUIS ETHIS. June 5, 1780. Resolved, That a brevet commission of lieutenant-colonel of cavalry be granted to Monsieur Louis Ethis de Corney, and that the President furnish him with letters to the State Executives requesting their aid and advice in procuring provisions, &c., for French forces expected to arrive. Resolved, That a brevet commission of colonel of cavalry be granted to Monsieur Louis Ethis De Corney. DE CREMIS. November 9, 1778. A petition from the Chevalier de Cremis was read ; whereupon Resolved, That a brevet commission of lieutenant-colonel be granted to the Chevalier de Cremis. DE FONTEVIEU. January 13, 1779. Resolved, That Congress agree to said report (cited in the case of Allain, and which recommends that the brevet of lieutenant be also grant- ed to Monsieur de Fontevieu). Resolved, That the sum of 400 dollars be paid to each of these (French) gen- tlemen to enable them to prosecute their voyage to France. DE FRANCHESSIN, JACQUES ANTOINE. July 20, 1776. The Board of War brought in a report which was taken into consideration ; whereupon. Resolved, That a brevet commission of lieutenant-colonel be granted to Monsieur- Jacques Antoine de Franchessin, a Knight of the Order of St. Louis, an experienced officer in the French service, and who is well recommended in letters from abroad, and that he be ordered to join the flying camp. July 25, 1776. It was ordered that two months' pay be advanced to Monsieur Jacques Antoine de Franchessin. DE GLASHEECH. March 9, 1781. Resolved, That Baron de Glasheech, who served with Brig,T 13* 282 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM Gen'l. Morgan as a volunteer, have the brevet commission of a captain in the army of the U S. in consideration of his merit and services. DE LAMNO. January 13, 1779. Resolved, That Congress agree to said report (cited in the case of Allain, and which recommends that the brevet of lieutenant be also granted to Monsieur de Lamno). Resolved, That the sum of 400 dollars be paid to each of these (French) gentlemen to enable them to prosecute their voyage to France. DE LA NEUVILLE, JR., NOIRMONT. July 29, 1778. The Board of War report that Monsieur Noirmont de La Neuville, since the month of December, has acted as A. D. C. to Major-Gen'l. Conway, &c. ; whereupon, Resolved, That Monsieur Noirmont de La Neuville have the rank of major by brevet in the American army. October 18, 1779. Resolved, That Major de La Neuville, who has served two campaigns in the American army, and has obtained very honorable testi- monials of his merit, valor and services in the several capacities in which he has been employed, be appointed a lieutenant-colonel by brevet in the army of the U. S., and that Lieutenant-Colonel N. de La Neuville have permission to return to France. DE LA NEUVILLE, SR. October 4, 1778. Resolved, That a brevet commission of brigadier be granted to Monsieur de La Neuville, the elder, in the army of the U. S. of America, to date August 14, 1778. DE MAFASTRAM. January 13, 1779. Resolved, That Congress agree to said report (cited in the case of Allain, and which recommends that the brevet of lieutenant be also granted to Monsieur de Mafastram). Resolved, That the sum of 400 dollars be paid to each of these (French) gentlemen to enable them to prosecute their voyage to France. DE MALMADY. September ig, 1779. Resolved, That Monsieur Marquis de Malmady be appointed to the rank and pay of a major by brevet in the Continental army, and receive a commission accordingly. DE MONTFORT. March 21, 1777. Resolved, That the Count de Montfort be recommended to General Washington for the brevet of lieutenant. DE PONCEAUX. February 18, 1778. Resolved, That ***** Monsieur de Ponceaux, Secretary to Baron Steuben, have the brevet rank of captain in the army of the y, S, ' 1776 TO 1812. 283 DE PONTIERE. February i8, 1778. Resolved, That Monsieur de Pontiere be appointed a captain of horse by brevet » « * *. September 13, 1783. Resolved, That Captain de Pontiere, late of Pulaski's Legion, be promoted to the ranlc of major by brevet in the army of the U. S., his relative rank to be settled by the date of his present commission. DERICK. November 6, 1778. Resolved, That Major Derick be permitted to return to the U. S. of the Netherlands, and that he be promoted to the rank of lieutenant- colonel by brevet, as a testimony of his merit and services in the army of the U. S. December 29, 1779. Resolved, That in consideration of the peculiar cir- cumstances attending the case of Lieutenant-Colonel Derick, that gentleman receive the pay and subsistence of a lieutenant-colonel in the army of the U. S. from the date of his brevet until the further order of Congress. DE TREUSON. January 13, 1779. Resolved, That Congress agree to said report (cited in the case of Allain, and which recommends that the brevet of captain be granted to Monsieur de Treuson). Resolved, That the sum of 400 dollars be paid to each of these (French) gentlemen to enable them to prosecute their voyage to France. DE VALCOUR, JOHN SIMONET. December i, 1778. A letter of November 1 1, f rom Elisha Sheldon, Colonel, Samuel Blackden, Lieutenant-Colonel, Benjamin Talmud, Major, and Josiah Stoddard, Captain, of the 2d Regiment of Light Dragoons, was read, represent- ing that Lieutenant John Simonet De Valcour has served with reputation in the 2d regiment of cavalry since its first establishment ; that the rupture be- tween France and England beginning to grow serious and interesting, Lieu- tenant Simonet is desirous of rejoining the army of His most Christian Ma- jesty, and therefore requesting that Congress would promote Lieutenant Sim- onet to a captaincy in the ■ cavalry, on condition of his leaving his present service, as an honorary compensation of his attachment and fidelity, with a saving to all his present senior officers, their superiority of rank and command, whereupon, Resolved, That Lieutenant John Simonet de Valcour be promoted to the rank of captain by brevet, on the condition and with the saving in the above letter. DE VIENNE. July 1 5, 1778. The Marquis de Vienne, a major in the service of the King of France, having served with reputation as a volunteer in the American army during the present campaign, and having requested Congress to honor him with the brevet commission of a colonel, without any pay annexed to the said rank. Resolved, That the request of the Marquis de Vienne be complied with, and that a brevet commission of a colone^n the service of the U. S. be con- ferred on him. 284 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM DE VERNEJOUX, JEAN LOUIS. September 19, 1776, Resolved, That Jean Louis de Vernejouxbe appointed o the rank and pay of a captain by brevet, and commissioned accordingly.- DU PLESSIS, DE MAUDUIT. January 19, 1778. Resolved, That a brevet of lieutenant-colonel be granted to the Chevalier De Mauduit Du Plessis, as a reward for his services and an encouragement to merit ; and that his commission bear date the 26th of Novem- ber, 1777, in order that the recompense may more immediately follow the ser- vices which he has done. (Mem. On the 3d of November, 1778, a resolution was introduced giving Du Plessis a brevet of colonel of artillery, but it was negatived.) ELBERT, SAMUEL. November 3, 1783. Resolved, That Colonel Samuel Elbert be promoted to the rank of brigadier by brevet. FANEUIL. March 24, 1777. Resolved, That Monsieur Faneuil have the rank of a col- onel by brevet in the Continental army without pay or rations. FONTIVIEUX. February 6, 1784. Resolved, That the commission of "captain by brevet be issued to Lieutenant Fontivieux. FOUQUET. FOUQUET, MARK. i January 15, 1778. Resolved, That in compliance with the ' said agreement (made by the Board engaging these persons in the service), Mr. Fouqiiet; the father, have the brevet rank of captain, and Mark Fouquet, the son, the brevet rank of lieutenant of artillery, .iri'the army of the U. S. FULLERTON, RICHARD. November i, 1783. Lieutenant JRJchard Fullerton, having acted as a volun- teer at an early period of the war, particularly in the action on Long Island, and at the battles of Trenton and Princeton, and having discharged the several extra appointments of adjutant, major of brigade, ancl the important one of assistant adjutant-general to the southern army, highly to the satisfaction of his general officers, . - . . •, ^, Resolved, That the Secretary of War issue to Lieutenant Fullerton the brevet oibmmission of ca,ptain. GERARD. September 3, 1778. Resolved, ThaJ, Mr. Gerard be appointed. to the rank of a lieutenant of dragoons by brevet, and he permitted to join the army Ulider 1776 TO 1812. 285 General Washington, he having agreed to serve in that capacity at his own expense. GIBBONS. July 26, 1779. Resolved, unanimously, That Congress warmly approve and applaud the cool, determined spirit with which Lieutenant Gibbons and » * * led on the forlorn hope (at Stony Point), braving danger and death in the cause of their country. ... ■, ■ . ^ Resolved, unanimously, That brevets of captam be given to Lieutenant Gibbons and * * * *. GILES, EDWARD. March 9, 1781. Resolved, That Major Edward Giles, A. D. C. of Brigadier- General Morgan, have the brevet commission of major in the army of the U. S. in consideration of his merit arid services. GONVION. November 16, 1781. Resolved, That Lieutenant-Colonel Gonvion, of the corps of engineers, receive the brevet of colonel. GOODALE. . October 16, 1783. Whereas it appears that Captain Goodale, lately promo- ted to the rank of major by brevet, has distinguished himself by extraordinary military services. Resolved, That the Secretary of War issue to Captain Goodale a major's : commission in the line of the army. HARMAR^ JOSIAH. Lieut.-Col.-Comdt. Revol. Army. Lieut.-Col.-Comdt. Inf'y reg't, Sept. 29, 1789. General-in-chief of the army. July 31, 1787. Resolved, That the Secretary of War.transmitto Lieutenant- Colonel-Commandant Harmar, a brevet commission of brigadier-general, and that he be allowed the emoluments but not the pay of the said rank. The allowance to commence with, and continue during, his command on the frontier. HASKELL. September 30, 1783. Resolved, That the Iwevet commission of major in the army of the U. S- issue to Captain Haskell, A. D. C. to Major-General R. Howe. HAY, UDNEY. January 9, 1777. Resolved, That Udney Hay, Esq:, be appointed a lieuten- ant-colonel by brevet, and Asst. Dep. Q. M. General, and stationed at Ticon- deroga. May 29, 1778. Resolved, That Udney Hay, Esq., who, under the former arrangement of the said (Q. M. Genl's) department was appointed Asst. Dep. Q. M. General, ajid a lieutenant-colonel by brevet, cannot now hold that office by virtue of gaid appointment,- nor be entitled to any privilege or emolument, 286 ' BREVETS CONFERRED FROM which either does at present, or may hereafter, accrue to any officer of the same rank in the line. HAZEN, MOSES. June 29, 1781. Resolved, That Colonel Moses Hazen be, and he hereby is, appointed a brigadier in the army of the U. S. by brevet. HOUDIN, M. G. February 6, 1784. Resolved, That the commission of major by brevet be issued to Captain M. G. Houdin. KNOX, HENRY. July 26, 1779, Resolved, unanimously, That Congress virarmly approve and applaud the cool, determined spirit with which Lieutenant Knox and * * * * led on the forlorn hope (at Ston^ Point), braving danger and death in the cause of their country. Resolved, unanimously, That brevets of captain be given to Lieutenant Knox and * * • *. KOSCIUSKO, THADDEUS. 'October 13, 1783. Resolved, That the Secretary of War transmit to Colonel Kosciusko the brevet commission of brigadier-general, and signify to that officer that Congress entertain a high sense of his long, faithful and meritor- ious services. LAUGHBURN, WILLIAM. October 6, 1783. Whereas William Laughburn hath sei ved tromthe com- mencement of the war with equal disinterestedness and reputation. Resolved, That a brevet commission, of lieutenant-colonel be granted to the said William Laughburn. LE BRUN. February 6, 1784. Resolved, That the commission of major by brevet be issued to Captain Le Brun. LE FIEVRE. January 13, 1779. Resolved, That Congress agree to said report (cited in the case of AUain, and which recommends that the brevet of lieutenant be also granted to Monsieur Le Fievre). Resolved. That the sum of 400 dollars be paid to each of these (French) gentlemen to enable them to prosecute their voyage to France. L'ENFANT, PIERRE CHARLES. May 2, 1783, Resolved, » * * That Captain L'Enfant, of the engineer corps, be promoted to the rank of major by brevet. 1776 TO I812. 287 LE ROY. February 6, 1784. Resolved, That the commission of captain by brevet be issued to Lieutenant Le Roy. LE TOURNEAU. January 13, 1779, Resolved, That Congress agree to said report (cited in the case of Allain, and which recommends that the brevet of lieutenant be also granted to Monsieur Le Tourneau.) Resolved, That the sum of 40D dollars be paid to each of these (French) gentlemen to enable them to prosecute their voyage to France. MAC PHERSON, WILLIAM. (Brig.-Gen'l. Mar. 11, 1799.) September 16, 1779. Resolved, That a brevet of major in the army of the U. S. be granted to -William Mac Pherson, and that while in actual service he receive the pay and subsistence of major. MARCELLIN. February 6, 1784. Resolved, That the commission of captain by brevet be issued to Lieutenant Marcellin. McCALLISTER. September 24, 1779. Resolved, that Congress justly esteem the military caution so happily combined with daring activity by Lieutenant McCallister and * * *, in leading the forlorn hope (at Powle's Hook). Resolved, That the brevet and pay and subsistence of captain be given to Lieutenant McCallister and * * • MORRIS. September 9, 1778. Resolved, That Major Morris, A. D. C to Major-General Sullivan, who brought forward to Congress the account of the repulse of the British forces on Rhode Island, on the 29th of August, and who, on the late expedition, as well as on several other occasions, behaved with great spirit and good conduct, be promoted to the rank of lieutenant-colonel by brevet. MOYLAN, STEPHEN. November 3, 1783. Resolved. That Colonel Stephen Moylan be promoted to the rank of brigadier by brevet. MULLENS, THOMAS. June II, 1778. The Board of War report that Major Thomas Mullens, late an A.D.C to Major-General Coudray, is an -old officer in the French service ; that he served the last campaign in the itiain army, and for his bravery and good conduct at the battles of Brandywine and Germantown was honored with psrticular marks of approbation by the Commander-in-chief in General Orders and that he means to accompany General Coudray to France. 288 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM Resolved, That Major Thomas Mullens, who served with honor in the last campaign, have a brevet commission of lieutenant-colonel in the armies of the U.S.. MURNAND, J. B. September 15, 1783. Resolved, That the commission of lieutenant-colonel by brevet in the army of the U. S. be issued to Major Murnand. NEVILLE. 1 October 27, 1778. Resolved, That Mr. Neville, A. D. C. to the Marquis de la Fayette, be promoted to the rank of lieutenant-colonel in the service of the U. S. by brevet. NORTH, WILLIAM. (Adjt.-Gen'I of the Army (B. G.) July 19, 1798.) ■ September 11, 1783, Resolved, Thatthe Secretary of War be, and he is hereby, directed to issue to Captain North, A. D. C. to Major-General Steuben, the ' brevet commission of major in the army of the U. S. OTTENDORF, N. D. ■ November 8, 1776. Resolved, That Mynheer N. D. Ottendorf be appoint- ed a brevet captain in the service of the U. S. November 9, 1776. Two months pay advanced to Capt. Ottendorf, and ordered to repair to Head-quarters and put himself under command of General Washington. December 5, 1776. Resolved, That Captain Ottendorf be directed to raise an independent corps, consisting of 150 men (to be divided into three compa- nies, &c.,) ; that Captain Ottendorf have the rank of Major, (and that he) be captain of the light infantry, and command. PENET, P. October 14, 1776. Resolved, That General Washington be informed the Congress approves of his appointing P. Penet his aid-de-camp by brevet, and that a commission of aid-de-carap be accordingly transmitted to him. PINCKNEY, CHARLES COTESWORTH. (Col. in the Revol. Army. Major-General July i, 1798.) . November 3, 1783. Resolved, That Colonel Charles Cotesworth Pinckney be promoted to the rank of brigadier by brevet. ROCHEFONTAINE. November 16, 1781. Resolved, That Captain Rochefontaine, of the corps of engineers, receive the brevet of major. ROGERS, NICHOLAS. December 10, 1778. Resolved, That Major Nicholas Rogers, who came 1776 TO 1812. 289 from France with Monsieur de Coudray, has served as A. D. C. to Major-Gen- eral De Kalb, and has obtained honorable testimonies of his conduct, but from the situation of his present affairs is obliged to leave the army, be promoted to the rank of lieutenant-colonel by brevet, as a reward for his services. RUDOLPH, MICHAEL. (Adjt. and Insp. of the Army, February 22d, 1793.) September 24, 1779. Resolved, That Congress justly esteem the military caution so happily combined with daring activity by Lieutenants * * * Ru- dolph, in leading the forlorn hope (at Powle's Hook.) Resolved, That the brevet, and pay and subsistence of a captain be given to * * * * Lieutenant Rudolph. RUSSELL, WILLIAM. (Colonel 7th Infantry, March 3d, 1808.) ■ November 3, 1783. Resolved, That Colonel William Russell be promoted to the rank of brigadier by brevet. SARGENT, WINTHROP. (Adjt-Gen'l of the Army under Maj.-Gen'l St. Clair, 1791.) August 28, 1783. Resolved. That Captain Winthrop Sargent be, and he is hereby, promoted to the rank of major by brevet in the army of the U. S. SECOND. September 30, 1783. Resolved, That Captain Second, late of Pulaski's Le- gion, be promoted to the rank of major by blevet in the army of the U. S., his relative rank to be settled by the date of his commission. SMITH, FRANCIS J. July 29, 1778. Whereas Monsieur Francis Joseph Smith has requested a commission, to be made use of in case of his being made a prisoner while serving as a volunteer in the American Army. Resolved, That Monsieur F. J. Smith have the commission of ensign Ijy brevet in the array of the U. S. ST. ELMO, GERARD DE. February 13, 1779. The Board of War, to whom was referred the letter of February 3, from Monsieur Gerard de St. lElmo, having reported specially thereon. Congress took into consideration the said report, and thereupon came to the following Resolution: That Monsieur Gerard de St. Elmo, having man- ■ ifested great zeal and encountered many difficulties to distinguish himself in the service of these States, (and) having also made a campaign here and be- haved with bravery, and being about to return to France, ■ Resolved, That he be appointed to the rank of major by brevet, as a testi- mony of the approbation of Congress of his zeal and services. 290 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM STEVENS, EBENEZER. May 27, 1777. Resolved, That Captain Stevens of the artillery have the brevet of a major, he having had that rank before his present appointment as a captain, and being a worthy, good officer, as General Schuyler represents. April 30, 1778. Resolved, That Major Ebenezer Stevens, in consideration of his services, and the strict attention with which he discharged his duty as commanding officer of artillery in the Northern Department during two cam- paigns, take rank by brevet as a lieutenant-colonel of Foot, and that he be commissioned accordingly. STEWART. November 19, 1777. ^wo&^i/. That Major Stewart, who brought the late intelligence from General Gates, and who is recommended as a deserving officer, have the rank of lieutenant-colonel by brevet, and be presented with a sword of the value of ^100. STRUBING, PHILIP. April 15, 1784. Resolved, That a brevet commission of captain in tlie army of the U. S. be issued to Lieutenant Philip Strubing, late of Van Heer's Corps. TERNANT. October 13, 1783. Resolved, That the Secretary of War issue to Lieutenant- Colonel Ternant the brevet commission of colonel. TOUSARD, LEWIS. (Lieut -Col.-Comdt. Arty, and Engrs. May 26, 1800.) October 27 1778. Resolved, That the gallantry of Monsieur Tousard in the late action on Rhode Island is deserving of the highest applause, and that Congress, in consideration of his zeal and misfortune, do promote the said Monsieur Tousard to the rank of lieutenant-colonel by brevet, and that he do receive a pension of 30 dollars per month out of the Treasury of the U. S, during his life. ^J VERDI. January 18, 1799- Resolved, That Congress agree to said report (cited in the case of Allain, and which recommends that the brevet of lieutenant be also granted to Monsieur Verdi). Resolved, That the sum of 400 dollars be paid to each of these (French) gentlemen to enable them to prosecute their voyage to France. VERDIER. February 6, 1784. Resolved, That the commission of captain by brevet be issued to Lieutenant Verdier. VERMONET. September 18, \-,-j6. Resolved, That Monsieur Vermonet have rank and pay of a major by brevet, he being a gentleman of considerable military abilities. 1776 TO I812. 291 VILLEFRANCHE. May 2, 1783. Resolved, That Major Villefranche, of the corps of engineers, be promoted to the rank of lieutenant-colonel by brevet. WILKINSON, JAMES. Adjt.-Gen*l. of Gates' Army, afterwards Lieut.-Col.-Comdt. 2d Inf., Nov. 7, 1791. Brig.-Gen'l. Mar. 5, 1792. Gen'1-in-chief of the army Dec. 1796. Major- Gen'l Mar. 2, 1813. November 6, 1777. Resolved, That Colonel James Wilkinson, Adjt.-General in the Northern army, in consideration of his services in that Department and being strongly recommended by General Gates as a gallant officer and a prom- ising military genius, and having brought the despatches to Congress giving an account of the surrender of Lieut.-Gen'l . Burgoyne and his army' on the 17th of October last, be continued in his present employment with a brevet of brigadier- general in the army of the U. S. March 6, 1778. On account of dissatisfaction in the army James Wilkinson relinquished his brevet of brigadier. Resignation accepted. Brevet major- general, July 10, 1812 (No record for what service). BREVETS CONFERRED FROM 1812 TO THE PRESENT TIME. Oiig, Ent. into Service. Hig't. S'nk. Beg't. or Corps. ABADIE, EUGENE H. {AsstSurg., July 4, '36.) (Surg. [Major), July 24, '53.) Brevet Lt. Col. and Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. ABBOTT, ASA T. [id Lt. 2%th Inf., Mar. 7, '67.) {\st. Lieut, yi. Arty., June 20, 'j6.) Brevet 1st Lt., March 7, 1867, for faithful and meritorious services in the Signal Corps during the war. ABBOTT, ED"WARD S. (2dLt. \-]th Inf., Nmi. 10, '62.) {\st. Lt., lyt/i Inf.) Brevet Capt., July 2, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. ABBOTT, HENRY L. (Bvt. 2d Lt. Top. Engrs., July I, '54.) [Maj. Engrs.,Nov. 11, '65.) Brevet Capt., July 21, i86i,for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Bull Run, Va. Brevet Maj., May 4, 1862, for gallant and meritorious ser- vices at the siege of Yorktown, Va. Brevet Lt. Col., March 13, 1865, for gal- lant and meritorious services during the siege of Petersburgh. Va. Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. Brevet Brig. Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services in the field during the war. ABBOTT, ROBERT O. (Asst. Surg., JVorv. 23, '49.) [Surg. [Major), Apl 16, '62.) Brevet Lt Col. and Brevet Col., March, 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious, services during the war. 294 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 ABEEL, JAMES S. (ZdLt. lyllnf.. May 3, '13.) [ist. Lt. 2yl Inf. Oct. i, '14.) Retained, January, i8i6 (in reorganization under act of March 3, 1815), as 2d Lt. of artillery, with Brevet of ist Lt. from October i, 1814. Brevet Capt., April 20, 1828, for lo years' faithful service in one grade. ABERCROMBIE, JOHN J. (Bvt. 2d Lt. 1st. Inf., July 1, '22.) [Col. ith Inf., Feb. 25, '61.) Brevet Maj., December 25, 1837, for gallant and meritorious conduct in Florida, Brevet Lt. Col., September 23, 1846, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Monterey. Brevet Brig. Genl., March 13, 1865, for long and faith- ful services in the army. ABERT, JAMES T. {Bvt. 2dLt. t^tk Inf., July i, '42.) {Maj. ofEngrs., Mar. 3, 'b},.) Brevet Lt. Col., June 25, 1864, for faithful and meritorious services in the valley of the Shenandoah from June, 1861, to September, 1862. ABERT, JOHN J. [Maj. Top. Engrs., Aov. 22, '14.) [Col. Top. Engrs., July 7, '38.) Bre-«et Lt.-Col., November 22, 1824, for 10 years faithful service in one grade. ABERT, "WILLIAM S. (2d Lt. ^h Arty., June 18, '55.) [Maj. yth Cav., June 8, '67.) Brevet Maj., May 27, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Hanover C. H., Va. Brevet Lt. Col., September 17, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Antietam, Md. ACKER, WILLIAM H. (Capt. idth Inf., May 14, '61.) ( Cap. i6th Inf., May 14, '61.) Brevet Maj., April 7, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Shiloh, Tenn. ADAIR, JOHN J. [2d Lt. i8tA Inf., July 14, '62.) [\st Lt. \'ith Inf., Mar. 22, '63.) Brevet ist Lt., December 31, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Murfreesboro, Tenn. Brevet Capt., September i, 1864, for gal- lant and meritorious services during the Atlanta campaign and at the battle of Jonesboro, Ga. ADAMS, GEORGE F. [2d Lt. I7tk Inf., June 30, '64.) [\st Lt. lyth Inf., June 30, '64.), Brevet Capt., August i8th, 1864, for gallant services at the battle on the Weldon R. R., Va. ADAMS, JOHN. [Bvt. 2d Lt. xst Drgs., July I, '46.) [Capt. 1st Drgs., N'ov. 30, '56.) Brevet ist Lt., March 16, 1848, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Santa Cruz de Rosales, Mex. TO THE PRESENT TIME. 295 ADAMS, JOHN Q. (■2d Lt. isi Cav., Aug. 17, '67.) {\st Lt. 1st Cav., Sep. 14, '69.) Brevet 1st Lt., August 17, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the signal corps at the battle of Alatoona, Ga. Brevet Capt., August 17, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the signal corps at the capture of Fort Mc- Allister and Savannah, Ga., and during the war. ADAMS, SAMUEL. (Asst. Surg., Apl. 16, "62.) (Asst. Surg., Apl. 16, '62.) Brevet Capt., March 13, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services during the operations in front of Petersburg, Va. Brevet Maj., March 13, 1S65, for faith- ful and meritorious services during the war. ADAMS, 'WrUJAM B. (\st Lt.-T^. Inf., Mar. 12, '12.) (Cap. -yl Inf., May 13, '13.) Retained, May, 1816 (in reorganization under act of March 3, 181 5), as ist Lt Jth Infantry, with Brevet of Capt from May 13, 1813.) ALBEE, aEORGI! E. (zdLt. 4irf Inf., July 28, '66.) (ist Lt. 41st Inf., Nov. 4, '67.) Brevet 1st Lt, March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of the Wilderness, Va. ALBURTIS, WILLIAM. (zdLt 2d Inf., Mar. 8, '37.) (\st Lt. 2d Inf., July i, '39.) Brevet Capt., March 2, 1841, for gallant and good conduct in war against Florida Indians. ALDBN, CHARLES H. (Asst. Surg., June 23, '60.) (Surg., July 28, '66.) Brevet Maj. and Brevet Lt. Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. ALDEN, GEORGE E. (A.Q.M.(Capt.)Nm.2T,'(,t,.) (A. Q. M. (Capt.) JVin/. 27, '6^.) Brevet Maj., March z, 1867, for faithful and meritorious services in the Quartermaster's Department during the war. ALDRICH, BISHOP. (2d Lt. %th Inf., Oct. 31, '63.) (1st Lt. ?,th Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet 1st Lt, May 10, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Spottsylvania, Va. ALESHIRE, CHARLES C. (2dLt. zdArty., May 11, '66.) (1st Lt. 'id Arty., Feb. 5, '67.) Brevet Capt, March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Peach Tree Creek, Ga. ALEXANDER, ANDREW J. (2dLt. M. Rifles, July 26, '61.) (Maj. ?,th Cav., July 28, '66.) Brevet Capt, July 1, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services during the Peninsular Campaign in Va. Brevet Maj., July 3, 1863J for gallant and meri- 296 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 torious services in the Gettysburg Campaign. Brevet Lt. Col., July 20, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services in the Atlanta Campaign. Brevet Col., April 2, 1865. for gallant and meritorious services at the capture of Selma, Ala. Brevet Brig. General, April 16, 1865, for distinguished skill and gallantry in the cavalry engagements at Ebenezer Church, Ala., and Columbus, Ga., and for steadfast devotion to duty in the iield during the war. ALEXANDER, BARTON S. (Bvt. 2d Lt. Engrs., July I, '42.) {Lt.-Col. Engrs.,, Mar. 7, '67.) Brevet Maj., July 21, 1861, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Bull Run, Va. Brevet Lt. Col., May 4, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the siege of Yorktown, Va. Brevet Col. and Brevet Brig. Geiil.' March 13, 1865, for meritorious services during the war. ALEXANDER, CHARLES T. (Asst. Surg., Oct. I, '56.) (Surg., Feb. 9, '63.) Brevet Lt. Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the wair. ALEXANDER, EDMUND B. (Bvt. zd Lt. eth Inf., July i, '23.) (Col. \oth Inf., Mar. 3, '55.). Brevet Maj., April 18, 18-47, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Cerro Gordo. Brevet Lt Col., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Contreras and Churubusco. Brevet Brig. Genl , March 13, 1865, for merito- orious services in the recruitment of the armies of the United .States. ALEXANDER, RICHARD H. (Asst. Surg., Dec. 2, '53.) (Surg., June 11, '62.) Brevet Lt. Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. ALEXANDER, THOMAS L. (Bvt. 2d Lt. 6th Inf. July i, '30.) (Lt.-Col. t,tk Inf. July 31, '61.I Brevet Maj., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Contre-. ras and Churubusco. ALLEN, CHARLES J. (\st Lt. Engrs., June 13, '64.) (Caft. Engrs., Mar. 7, '67.) Brevet Capt., August 23, 1864, for highly meritorious services at the siege- of Forts Gaines and Morgan, Ala. Brevet Maj., March 26, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the campaign against the city of Mobile and its defenses. ALLEN, GEORGE C. (Ens. -jth Inf., Dec. 12, '08.) (Capt. -^tk Inf., Apl, 19, '14.) Brevet Maj., January 8, 1815, for gallant conduct at the siege of New Or- leans. ALLEN GEORGE VT. (zdLt. Ztk Inf., Feb. 13, '18.) (Cafit. ifk Inf., Jan. 25, '29.) Brevet Capt., January i, 1829, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. Brevet Maj., December 25, 1837, for gallant conduct on several occasions and' general efficiency in the war against Florida Indians. Brevet Lt. Col., May 9, 1846, for gallant conduct in the battles of Palo Alto and Resaca de la Palma. TO THE PRESENT TIME. 297 ALLEN, HARRISON. (Assi. Surg., July 30, '62.) {Asst. Surg., July 30, '6 2.) Brevet Capt,, and Brevet Maj., March 13, 1863, for faithful and meritorious Services during the war. ALLEN, HARVE7 A. [zdLt. 2d Arty., July i, '41.) (Maj. id Arty., Aug. i, '63.) Brevet Capt., September 8, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Molino del Rey. ALLEN, ROBERT. {Bvt. 2d Lt., 2d Arty., July 1, '36.) (A. Q. M. G. (Col.), July 28, '66.) Brevet Maj., April 18, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Cerro Gordo. Brevet Lt.-Col., Brevet Col. and Brevet Brig.-Genl., July 4, 1864 (no services recited). Brevet Maj.-Genl., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritori- ous services during the war. ALLEN, VANDERBILT. (\st Lt. Corps of Engrs., June 13, '64.) (ist Zt. Corps of Kngrs., June I3,''64.) Brevet Capt., and Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for distinguished and meri- torious services and great gallantry in action. ALLSWORTH EDWARD. (2d Lt. ifitk Inf., July 28, '66.) ( ist Lt. 2tfk Inf., Jan. 25, '72. Brevet ist Lt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. ALLYN, ARTHUR "W. Xist Lt. idth Inf., May 14, '61.) (Capt. i6t& Inf., June 24, '64.) Brevet Capt, December 31, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Murfreesboro, Tenn. Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. ALSTON, THOMAS L. (2dZt. \2th Inf., June i, '63.) (\st Lt. 12th Inf., Sept. 9, '63.) Brevet Capt., August i, 1864, for gallant services at the battle of Spottsyl- vania, and during the campaign before Richmond. ALVORD, BENJAMIN. (Bvt. 2d Lt. 4*5 Inf., July i, '33.) (Paymaster Genl. (Brig.-Genl.), July 22, '76. ) Brevet Capt., May 9, 1846, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Palo Alto and Resaca de la Palma. Brevet Maj., August 15, 1847, for gallant and meri- torious conduct at Paso Ovejas, National Bridge, and Cerro Gordo. Brevet Lt.-Col. and Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. Brevet Brig.-Genl., April 9, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the Rebellion. AMES, ADELBERT. (2dLt. 2d Arty., May 6, '61.) (Lt.-Col. 2^h. Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet Maj., July 21, 1861, for gallant and.meritorious services at the battle oE Bull Run, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., July i, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Malvern Hill, Va. Brevet Col., July i, 1863, for gal- lant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Brig.- Genl., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the capture of Fort Fisher, N. C. Brevet Maj.-Genl., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meri- torious services in the field during the war. 14 298 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM 1 8 12 AMES, JOHN "W. (Caft. wth Inf., May 14, '61.) (Ca/A l\th Inf., May 14, '61.) Brevet Maj., June 27, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gaines's Mills, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., July 2, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. ANDERSON, AT.TiEN Ii. (Bvt. 2dLt. 2d Inf., July i, '59.) {Capt. Kfh Inf., Dec. 3, '62.) Brevet Maj., February 21, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Valverde, N. M. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. ANDERSON, JAMES W. (Bvt. zd Li. 2d Inf., July i, '33. ) ( Capt. 2d Inf., Fib. 16, '47. Brevet Capt., August 23, 1841, for gallant and successful conduct in war against Florida Indians. ANDERSON, JOHN. {2d Lt. Arty., Dec. 9, '07.) ( Top. Engrs. [Major], Apl. 12, '13.) Brevet Lt.-Col., April 12, 1823, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. ANDERSON, RICHARD H. {Bvt. 2d Lt. 1st Drags., July i, '42.) {Capt. 2d Drags., Mar. 3, '55.) Brevet ist Lt., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at San Augustin, Mex. ANDERSON, ROBERT. {Bvt. 2d Lt. 2d Arty., July i, '25.) {Brig.-Genl., May 15, '61.) Brevet Capt., April 2, 1838, for gallant and successful conduct in war against Florida Indians. Brevet Maj., September 8, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at the battle of Molino del Rey. Brevet Maj.-Genl., February 3, 1865, for gallant and meritorious conduct in the Harbor of Charleston, S. C.; in the defense of Fort Sumter. ANDERSON, SAMUEL S. {Bvt.2dLt.2dArty.,July\,'i,\.) . (Capt. 2d Arty., Mar. %,' ^e,.) Brevet Capt., September 8, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Molino del Rey. Brevet Maj., September 13, 1847, for gallant conduct at Cha- pultepec. ANDERSON, THOMAS M. 2dLt. 2d Cam., May 7, '61.) {Maj. 10th Inf., Mar. 26^ '68.) Brevet Maj., August I, 1864, for gallant services at the battle of the Wilder- ness. Brevet Lt.-Col., August i, 1864, for gallant services at Spottsylvania, Va. ANDREWS, ALBERT H. (irf Lt. igth Inf., May 14, '61.) {Capt. igth Inf., Jan. 30, '63.) Brevet Capt., April 7, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Shiloh, Tenn. Brevet Maj., December 31, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Murfreesboro, Tenn. ANDREWS, GEORGKB. {2d Lt. 6tk Inf., July i, '33.) , {Lt.-Col. 6tk Inf., Octr. 18, '55.) Brevet Maj., December 25, 1837, for gallant attd good conduct in war agains Florida Indians. TO THE PRESENT TIME. 299 ANDREWS, OEORai! L. {Maj. x-jth Inf., May 14, '61.) [Col. 2^tA Inf., Jan. i, '71.) Brevet Lt.-Col., August 30, 1862, for gallant arid meritorious services at the battle of Bull Run (2d) Va. Brevet Col., May 3, 1863, for gallant and meritori- ous services at the battle of Chancellorsville, Va. ANDREWS, OEORGE F. [Bvt. zdLt. T^Arty., July i, '45.) [Maj. t^th Arty., July 28, '66.) Brevet Capt., September 8, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Molino del Key. Brevet Maj., September 13, 1847, for gallant conduct at Chapultepec. ANDREWS, JOHN N. [Bvt. idLt. 4lA Inf., July I, '60.) [Capt. Zth Inf., June 21, '64.) Brevet Capt., August 9, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Cedar Mountain, Va. Brevet Maj., November 29, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Franklin, Tenn. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. ANDREWS, TIMOTHY P. [Paymaster, May 22, '22.) [Paymaster-Genl. [Colonel), Sept. 6, '62.) Prevet Brig.-Genl., September 13, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct in the battle of Chapultepec. (See narrative. Chap. 10.) ANDRTJSS, E. VAN A. . [idU. XstArty., June 13, '64.) [ist It. 1st Arty., May 10, '65.) Brevet ist Lt., April 2, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the cap- ture of Petersburg, Va. Brevet Capt., April 9, 1865, for gallant and meritori- ous services in the campaign terminating with the surrender of the rebel army of Northern Virginia. ANSART, FELIX. (2d Lieut. 2d Arty., July 2d, 1812.) ( Capt. yl Arty., Nov. 28, '19.) Brevet Maj., November 28, 1829, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. AFFLING, DANIEL. [2dLt. Rifles, May 3, '08.) [Maj. -jth Inf., Apl. 15, '14.) Brevet Lt.-Col., May 30, 1814, for gallant conduct at Sandy Creek, N. Y. Brevet Col., September 11, 1814, for distinguished services at Plattsburg. ARBUCKLE, MATTHEW. [Ens. zdlnf. Mar. 3, '99.) [Col. -jth Inf., Mar. 10, '20.) Brevet Brig.-Genl., March 10, 1830, for 10 'years' faithful service in one grade. ARCHER, JAMES J. [Capt. Voltigeurs, Fib. 23, '47.) [Capt. VolHgeurs, Feb. 23, '47.) Brevet Maj., September 13, '1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct in the battle of Chapultepec. ARCHER, SAMUEL B. [Capt. 2d Arty., Mar. 12, '12.) [Inspector Genl. [Col.), Nov. 10, '21.) Brevet Maj., May 27, 1813, for meritorious services in the bombardment of Fort George, U. C. 300 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 ARMES, GEORGE A. (zdLt. zd Cav., Apl. 19, '66.) (,Capt. xoth Cav., July 28, '66.) Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in action at Hatcher's Run, Va., December 9, 1864. ARMISTEAD GEORGE. (2rfZ;. -jth Inf., Jan. 8, '99.) ' {Maj. ^d Arty., Mar. 3, '13.) Brevet Lt.-Col., September 12, 1814, for gallant conduct in defense of Fort McHenry. ARMISTEAD, LEWIS A. (zdLt. 6tk Inf., July 10, '39.) (CaJ>t. 6th Inf., Mar. 3, '55.) Brevet Capt., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. Brevet Maj., September 8, 1847, for gallant and mer- jtorious conduct at Molino del Rey. ARMISTEAD, VT ALTER K. (zdLt. Engrs., Mar. 5, '03.) {Chief of Engrs. {Col), Nov. 12, '18.) Brevet Brig.-Genl., November 12, 1828, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade, ARMSTRONG, FRANCIS W. {Caft. 2^th Inf., Mar. 12, '12.) {Maj. 24th Inf., June 26, '13.) Retained, December, 1815 (in reorganization underact of March 3, 1815), as Captain, 7th Infantry, with Brevet of Maj. from June 26, 1813. ARMSTRONG, ROBERT L. {yl Lt. Light Arty., July 21, '14.) {\st Lt. Arty., July 2, '18. Brevet Capt., July 2, 1828, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. ARNOLD, ABRAHAM K. {Bvt.zdLt. 2d Cav., July i,' 59.) {Maj. 6 Cav., June 22, '69.) Brevet Capt., June 27, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services atthe battle of Gaines's Mills, Va. Brevet Maj., May 6, 1864, for gallantand meritorious services at the battle of Todd's Tavern, Va. ARNOLD, ISAAC. {2d Lt. 2d Arty., June 17, '62.) {Capt. Ordnance, Mar. 7, '67.) Brevet Capt., March 13, 1865, for faitliful and meritorious services during the war. ARNOLD, LEVriS G. {2d Lt. 2d Arty., Jily 1, '37.) {Lt.-Col. 2d Arty., Aug-, i, '63.) Brevet Capt., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco, Mex. Brevet Maj., September 13, 1847, for gallant conduct at Chapultepec. Brevet Lt.-Col., November 22, 1861, for gallant and meritorious services during the bombardment of Fort Pickens, Fla. ARNOLD, RICHARD. ' ' {Bvt. 2d Lt. Jst Arty., July i, '50) {Maj. <^h Arty., May I, '75.) Brevet Major, June 29, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the bat- tle of Savage Station, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., July, 8, 1863, for gallant and meri- torious services during the siege of Port Hudson, La. Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. Brevet Brig.-Genl. and Brevet Maj.-Genl., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services in the field during the war. TO THE PRESENT TIME. 301 ARNOLD, RIPLEY A., (2//ZA zd Drags., July l, '38.) [Capt. id Drags., Aug. 18, '47.) Brevet Capt., April ig, 1842, for gallant conduct in war against Florida In- dians. Brevet Maj., May 9, 1846, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Palo Alto and Resaca de la Palma. ARNOLD, WILBUR F. (zdLt. \%th Inf., Nov. 21, '62.) ( Caft. i,\st Inf., yuly 28, '66.) Brevet ist Lt, December 31, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Murfreesboro, Tenn. Brevet Capt., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. ARTHUR, WILLIAM. (2dLt. 2d Arty., Feb. 23, '66.) {Paymaster (Major),yuly 26, '75.) Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Spottsylvania, Va. Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Ream's Station, Va. ASBURY, HENRY. [idLt. 3d Inf., Aug. s, '61.) {Capt. ^dlnf. Dec. 31, '64.) Brevet Capt., July 2, 1S63, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Maj. March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. ASCH, MORRIS J. {Asst. Surg., Aug. S,'6i.) {Asst. Surg., Aug. 5, '61.) Brevet Capt. and Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. ASH, JOSEPH P. {2d Lt. tfh Cav., Apl. 30, '61.) {Capt. tfh Cav., Sept. 25, '63.) Brevet Maj., November 8, 1862, for conspicuous gallantry at Warrenton, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., May 8, 1864, for conspicuous gallantry at the battle of Spott- sylvania, Va. ^ ASHBY, JAMES A. ( Capt. 2d Drags., June 8, '36. ) ( Capt. 2d Drags., Juru 8, '36. ) Brevet Maj., July 19, 1836, for gallant and good conduct in the affair at Welika, Fla. ASPINWALL, THOMAS. {Maj. Cith Inf., Mar. 12, '12.) [Lt.-Col. itfh Inf., Mar. 12, '13.) Brevet Col., September 17, 1814, for distinguished and meritorious services in sortie f irom Fort Erie. ATCHESON, GEORGE, {2dLt. 6^h Inf., Feb. 19, '(13) ( 1st Lt. ifh Inf., Jan. 20, '65.) Brevet ist Lt., July i, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Capt., May 5, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of the Wilderness, Va. ATCHISON, CHARLES B. {zdLt. zdlnf, Aug. 5, '61.) {Capt. lifh Inf Mar. 5, '67.) Brevet ist Lt., July i, J862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Malvern Hill, Va. Brevet Capt., April 2, 1865, for gallant and meritorious 303 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 services during the operations resulting in the fall of Richmond. Brevet Maj., April 2, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. Brevet Lt.- Col., October 28, 1867, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. ATKINSON, HENRY. (Capt. yi/nf., July i, '08.) (Brig.-Genl., May 13, '20.) Retained, August, 1821 (in reorganization under act of March 2, 1821 ), as Colonel, 6th Infantry, with Brevet of Brig.-Genl. from May 13, 1820. ATWBLL.I'WILLIAM P. (zdLt. i,yllnf., Jan. 22, '67.) [zdLt. Ajd Inf., yaK.22,'67.) Brevet ist Lt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the assault on Petersburgh, July 30, 1864. Brevet Capt, March 2, 1867, for gal- lant and meritorious services during the war. ATWOOD, EDWIN B. (zdLt. 16th Inf., May 11, '65.) ^ (A. Q. M (Cipt), Apl. 24, '75.) Brevet ist Lt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Murfreesboro, Tenn. Brevet Capt, March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Chicamauga, Ga. Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Mission Ridge, Tenn. AUDBNRIED.^JOSEPH C. {id Lt. 1st Cmi.ljunezi,, '61.) (Capt. 6th Cav., jMy i, '66.) Brevet Capt., September 17, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Antietam, Md. Brevet Maj., September i, 1864, for gallant and meri- torious services in the Atlanta Campaign. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. AUGUR, CHRISTOPHER C. {Bvt.2dLt.2dInf.,yulyi,'^T,.') (Brig.-Genl., Mar. 4, '69.) Brevet Col., August 9, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the bat- tle of Cedar Mountain, Va. Brevet Brig.-Genl., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the capture of Port Hudson, La.. Brevet Maj.- Genl., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services in the field during the war. AUSTIN, LORING. (2dLt. \st Light Drags., Sept. 28, '12.) (Capt. 1,6th Inf.,Apl. 21, '14.) Brevet Maj., July 5, 1814, for gallant and distinguished conduct at the battle of Chippewa. AUSTIN, WILLIAM M. (Asst. Surg., Feb. 28, '66.) (Asst. Surg., Feb. 28, '66.) Brevet Capt., December 18, 1866, for meritorious and distinguished services at San Antonio, Texas, when cholera prevailed. AUSTINE, WILLIAM. (zd Lt. 2d Drags., July i, '38.) (Maj. ^d Arty., July 23, '6i.) Brevet Maj., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Contre- ras and Churubusco. Brevet Lt.-Col. and Brevet Col., September 28, 1865, for long and faithful services. TO THE PRESENT TIME. 3O3 AVERBLL, WILLIAM "WT. (Bvt. 2dZt. Mtd. Rifles, July \, 55.) (Capt. -^d Cav., July I-;, '62.) Brevet Maj., March 17, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services in action at Kelly's Ford, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., November 6, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services in action at Droop Mountain, Va. Brevet Col., December 15, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services during the Salem expedition in Virginia. Brevet Brig.-Genl., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious ser- vices ill the field during the war. Brevet Maj.-Genl., March 13, 1865, for gal- lant and meritorious services at the battle of Moorfield, Va. AVERY, ROBERT. ( \st Lt. 44tA Inf., July 28, '66. ) {\st Lt. i^h Inf., July 28, '65. ) Brevet CapL, March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the bat- tle of Chancellorsville, Va. Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meri- torious services at the battle of Look-out Mountain, Tenn. ATERS, GEORGE TV. \zdLt.-idArty., yuly\,'s,\.) {1st Lt. ^d Arty., Dec. 20, '45.) Brevet Capt., September 23, 1846, for gallant conduct in the several confl.cts at Monterey, Mex. AYRES, ROBERT. (zdLt. \ofk Inf., Nov. 29, '62.) (Capt. \^th Inf., Feb. 19, '66.) Brevet C^pt., November 25, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Mission Ridge, Tenn. AYRES, ROMBYN B. (Bvt 2dLt. ifh Arty., July i, '47.) {Lt.-Col. yl Arty., July 28, '66.) Brevet Maj., July 2, 1863, for gallant aird meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Lt.-Col., May 5, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of the Wilderness, Va. Brevet Col., August 18, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services in battle on the Weldon R. R., Va. Brevet Brig.-Genl., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Five Forks, Va. Brevet Maj.-Genl., March 13, 1865, for gallant and merito- rious services in the field during the war. BABBITT, EDWIN B. (Bvt 2dLt. yl Inf., July i, '26.) (A. Q. M. G. (Col.), July 29, '66.) Brevet Maj., May 30, 1848, for meritorious conduct while serving in the enemy's country. Brevet Col. March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. Brevet Brig.-Genl., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services in the Quartermaster's Department during the war. BABBITT, LAWRENCE S. {2dLt ylArty., June24,'6l.) (Capt. Ordn. Dept, Dec. 22, '66.) Brevet ist Lt., July 21, 1861, for gallant and meritorious services at the bat- tle of Bull Run, Va. Brevet Capt., March 13, 1865, f""^ faithful and meritori- ous services in the Ordnance Department during the war. BABCOCK, JOHNB. (2d Lt rfh Cav., Jan. 22, '67.) {\st Lt. tfh Cav., Feb. 14, '63.) Brevet ist Lt., Brevet Capt., and Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the battles of Sabine Cross Roads, Pleasant Hill, and Cane River Crossing, La. 304 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 BABCOCK, OKVILLE E. (Bvt. 2 Lt. Engrs., May 6, '6i.) (Maj. Engrs., Mar. 21, '67.) Brevet Capt., May 4, 1862, "for gallant and meritorious services during the siege of Yorktown, Va. Brevet Maj., November 29, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services during the siege of Knoxville, Tenn. Brevet lA-CoI., May 6, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of the Wilder- ness, Va. Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. Brevet Brig.-Genl., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritori- ous services in the field during the war. BACHE, DAT.T.AS. (Asst. Surg., May 28, '61.) {Surg., Aug. 5, '67.) Brevet Capt. and Brevet Maj., March;i3, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. BACHE, FRAirCIS M. {ist Lt. i6iA Inf., May 14, '6l.) (Capt. \eth Inf., Oct. 25, '6l.) Brevet Maj., December 2, 1864, for faithful and meritorious services in the field. Brevet Lt.-Col., April 9, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the operation resulting in the fall of Richmond and surrender of Gen- eral Lee. BACHE, HARTMAN, (Asst. Top. Engrs. {Capt.), July 24, '18.) ( Col. Corps of Engrs., Mar. 3, '63.) Brevet Maj., July 24, 1828, for ten years faithful service in one grade. Bre- vet Brig.-Genl., March 13, 1865, for long, faithful and meritorious services. BACHE, RICHARD. (\st U. Tfld Inf., Apl.\T,'\i.) (Capt. Ordn.,May yi,^i2.) Retained, May, 1815 (in re-organization under act of March 3, 1815), as 2d Lt. of Artillery, with Brevet of 1st Lt. from April 17, 1813. BACKENSTOS, JACOB B., (Capt. Mtd. Rifles, May 27, '46.) (Capt.Mtd. Rifles, May 27, '46.) Brevet Maj., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- trerasand Churubusco. Brevet Lt.-Col., September 13, 1847, for gallant an^ meritorious conduct at Chapultepec. BACKUS, EI.ECTUS. (Bvt. 2d Lt. 2d Inf., July i, '24.) ( Col. 6ti InflFeb. 20, '62.) Brevet Maj., September 23, 1846, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Monterey. BACON, CYRUS. (Asst. Surg., Apl. 16, '62.) (Asst.-Surg., Apl. 16, '62.) Brevet Capt. and Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. BACON, JOHN M. . [Capt. ^A Cav., July 28, '66.) (Capt. gti Cav., July 28, '66.) Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the siege of Resaca, Ga. TO THE PRESENT TIME. 3O5 BADEAU, ADAM. {idLt ifh Inf.'Mar. 22, '66.) (\st Lt. ijlh Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet Capt, Brevet Maj., Brevet Lt.-Col., Brevet Col. and Brevet Brig.- Genl., March 2,, 1867, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. BADEN NEHEMIAH. \\st Lt. Ordn., Aug. 6, '13.) (Capt. 2d Arty., Afl. i, '24.) Brevet Capt., August 6, 1823, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. Brevet Maj., April i, 1834, for lo years' faithful service in one grade. BADGER, NICHOLAS D. {id Lt. \oth Cav., July 28, '66.) ( \st Lt. zzd Inf., May 29, '67.) Brevet Capt., May 29, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. BADGER, ■WILLIAM. {idLt. 6tk Inf., May 19, '66.) (1st Lt. 6th Inf., Feb. 9, '67.) Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. BAILEY, EDWARD L. (2dLt. 4h Inf., Mar. 7, '67.) (i.U Lt. ifh Inf., Feb. 26, '76.) Brevet ist Lt, November 6, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Williamsburg, Va. Brevet Capt., November 6, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Fair Oaks, Va. Brevet Maj., November 6, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Bnll Run, {2d,) Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., November 6, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. BAILEV, JAMES. (1st Lt. (sth Inf., Jan. 3, '12.) (Capt, 6th Inf., Mar. 27, '14.) Retained, May, 1816 (in reorganization tmder act of March 3, 1815), as 1st Lt. 2d Infantry, with brevet of Capt. from March 27, 1814. BAILEY, T. C. J. (\st Lt. \-jth Inf.,. May 14, '61.) (Capt. i-]th Inf., Dec. 14, '62.) Brevet Maj., August 19, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services in battle ontheWeldonR. R., Va. BAILEY, "WILLIAM. '(1st Lt. lothlnf. Mar. 12, '12.) (Capt., loth Inf., Julyi% '14). Retained, December, 1815 (in reorganization under act of March 3, 1815), as istLt., 7th Infantry, with Brevet of Capt. from July 19, 1814. BAILY, ELISHA J. (Asst. Surg., Feb. 16, '47.) (Surg. (Lt.-Col.), June 26, '76.) Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. BAILY, JOSEPH C. (Asst. Surg., Oct. 27, '57.) [Surg., Dec. 1, '64.) Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. 14* 306 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 BAINBRIDGIi, AUGUSTUS H. {idLt. I4ti Inf., July 14, '62.) (Capt. \ifh Inf., Aug. 11, '66.) Brevet Capt., August 18, 1864, for gallant services during operations on Weldon R. R., Va. BAUTBRIDGE, EDMUND C. {Bvt. 2d Lt. :idArty., July I, '56.) ( Capt. tfh Arty., Aug. 30, '62.) Brevet Maj. and Brevet Lt.-CoL, March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. BAINBRIDGB, HENRY. Bvt. 2dLt 2d Inf., July i, '21.) (Lt.-Col. 1st Inf., July 11, '51.) Brevet Maj., September 23, 1846, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Monterey. Brevet Lt.-Col., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious con- duct at Contreras and Churubusco. BAINBRIDGE, WIIiLIAM P. (Bvt. 2dLt. id Arty., July i, '24.) (Capt a,th Arty., Mar. 19, '42.) Brevet Maj., April 18, 1847, forgallant and meritorious conduct in the battle of Cerro Gordo. BAIRD, ABSALOM. (Bvt. 2d Lt 2d Arty., July i, '49.) (Asst.-Inspr.-Genl. (I.t.-Col.), June 13, '67.) Brevet Lt.-Col., September 20, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Chickamauga, Ga. Brevet. Col., November 24, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Chattanooga, Tenn. Brevet Brig.- Genl., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the capture of Atlanta, Ga. Brevet Maj.-Genl., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services in the field during the war. BAKER, DANIEL. (Ens. and 2d Lt 16th Inf., Jany 8, '99.) (Lt.- Col. 6th Inf., May I, '29.) Brevet Maj., August 9, 181 2, for gallant conduct at the battle of Brownstown. BAKER, EUGENE M. (Bvt. 2d Lt. 2d Drags., July i, '59.) (Maj. 2d Cav., Apl. 8, '69.) Brevet Maj., May '5, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Williamsburg, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., September 19, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Wmchester, Va. Brevet Col., December I, 1868, for zeal and energy while in command of troops operating against hos- tile Indians in 1866-7-8. BAKER, ISAAC L. (Ens. 2d Inf., July 6, '12.) (Capt 44th Inf., Apl. 5, '13.) Brevet Maj. December 23, 1814, for gallant conduct at the siege of New Orleans. BAKER, JOHN P. (2dLt 1st Cav., Mar. 23, '61.) (Capt 1st Cav., July 17, '62.) Brevet Maj., April 9, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Pleasant Hill, La. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and merito- rious services during the war. TO THE PRESENT TIME. 30/ BAKER. RUFTTS L. [Asst. Dip. Com. Ord. (1st Lt), Afar. 12, '13.) (Lt.-Col. Ordn., July 10, '51.) Brevet Maj., May 21, 1827, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. Brevet Lt.-Col., May 30, 1848, for meritorious conduct, particularly in performing his duties, In prosecuting war with Mexico. BAIiCH, GEORGE T. (Bvt. 2d Lt. Ordn., July i, '51.) (Capt. Ordn., Nov. i, '61.) Brevet Maj. and Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services in the Ordnance Department. BALDEir, GEORGE. ( 1st Lt. 29th Inf., July 28, '66. ) ( Capt. y^th Inf., July 20, '68. ) Brevet Capt, March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in New Mexico, Colorado, and on the plains; while Adjutant of the 3d Colorado Vol- unteers. BALDWIN, HOMER H. {zd Lt. 5*4 Arty., May 14, '61.) (ist Lt. th Cav., July 28, '66.) (Capt. %th Cav., July 28, '66.) Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in action at Morganza, La. BATCHELDER, R. W. [A Q. M.(Capt.) Feb. 16, '65.) (Q. M. [Maj.), Jan. 18, '67.) Brevet Maj., Brevet Lt.-Col. and Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. TO THE PRESENT TIME. 3II BATES, DORUS E. [idLt. \jfh Inf., Feb. 19, '62.) {1st Lt. \yth Inf., May 14, '62.) Brevet Capt., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. BATES, FRANCIS H. (Bvt. 2d Lt. ifh Inf., July i, '50.) {Capt. 4iA Inf., May 14, '61.) Brevet Maj., June 27, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the bat- tle of Gaines's Mills, Va. BATES, JAIVTES A. . {Capt. Ayllnf, July 28, '66.) {Capt. 43d Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gaines's Mills, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 2, 1867, for gallant and merito- rious services at the battle of Malvern Hill, Va. BATES, JOHN C. {\stLt. wth Inf., May 14, '61.) {Capt. 20th Inf., May I, '63.) Brevet Maj., August i, 1864, for faithful and meritorious services in the field Brevet Lt.-Col., April 9, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the operations resulting in the fall of Richmond and surrender of General Lee. BATES, EINZIE. {2dLt. 1st Inf., Aug. S, '61.) (Capt. 1st Inf., Mar. 15, '66.) Brevet Capt. October 4, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the bat- tle of Corinth, Miss. Brevet Maj., July 4, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services during the siege of Vicksburg, Miss. BATES, ROBERT F. {2dLt. litklnf, Mar. 7, '67.) {istLt. i8tA Inf., Mar. 28, '73.) Brevet ist Lt., March 7, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. BAXTER, JEDEDIAH. {Asst. Med Purv. {Lt.-Col.), July 21a, '67.) {Chf. Md. Purv. {Col), June 23, '74.) Brevet Col., July 20, 1867, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. BAYARD, WILLIAM. {idLt. ifh Cav., Oct. 31, '63.) {Capt. ^th Cav., July 28, '66.) Brevet ist Lt., December 16, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services if pursuit of rebel forces under General Hood. Brevet Capt., April 2, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the capture of Selma, Ala. Brevet Maj., April 2, 1865, for -gallantry during the pursuit of Hood after the battle on Nashville, and in the charge of his regiment against the earthworks at Selma, Ala. BAYLOR, THOMAS G. {Bvt 2dLt. Ordn., July 1, '57.) {Maj. Ordn., Mar. 7, '67.)' Brevet Maj., September i, 1864, for gallant services in the capture of Atlanta, Ga. Brevet Lt.-Col., December 21, 1864, for gallant services in the capture of Savannah, Ga. Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for meritorious services during the campaign of Atlanta, Savannah and the Carolinas. 312 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 BAYNB, ANDREW C. (2d Lt. i,2d Inf., July 28, '66.) (^d Lt. i,idlnf., July 28, '(A.) Brevet 1st Lt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the bat- tle of Marye's Heights, Va. Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. BEACH, FRANCIS. (Bvt. idLt. 2,dAriy., July i, '57.) [Caft. ifk Arty., Aug. 14, '62.) Brevet Maj., September 17, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Antietam, Md. Brevet Lt.-Col., April 20, 1864, for gallant and meri- torious services during the siege of Plymouth, N. C. BEACH, SAMUEL E. (id Lf. \ffh Inf., Apl. 9, '47.) (u^ Lt. 15A4 Inf., Feb. — , '48.) Brevet ist Lt., August 20, 1847, f*"" gallant and meritorious conduct in the battles of Contreras and Churubusco. BE ALL, BENJAMIN L. ( Caft. 2d Drags., June 8, '36. ) ( Col. 1st Brags., May — , '61 . ) Brevet Maj., March 1 5, 1S37, for gallant and successful service in war against Florida Indians. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 16, 1848, for gallant and meritorious conduct in the battle of Santa Cruz de Rosales. BBALL, LLOYD. {Caft. <^/i Inf., Jan. 8, '99.) (Maj. Arty., Apl. 21, '14.) Brevet Maj., July 10, 1812. No record. BEALL, THOMAS J. {2dLt. Arty.. Mar. i, '11.) [Capt. ifh Rifles, Mar. 17, '14.) Retained, January, 1816, (in reorganization under act of March 3, 1815,) as 1st Lt. Artillery, with Brevet of Capt. from March 17, 1814. Brevet Maj., September 26, 1828, for ten years' faithful service in one grade. BEAN, JOHN "W. {2d Lt. 35//2 Inf., Jan. 22, '67.) (1st Lt. itfk Inf., Dec. 13, '71.) Brevet ist Lt. March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the bat- tle of Fredericksburg, Va. Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meri- torious services in the battle of Cold Harbor, Va, BEARD, WILLIAM C. (2d Lt. Rifles, May 19, '12.) (Capt. 1st Rifles, Aug. 20, '14.) Retained, May, 1816, (in reorganization under Act of March 3, 1815,) as ist Lt. 1st Infantry, with Brevet of Capt, from August 20, 1814. BEARD SLEY, JOHN. (Bvt. 2d Lt. %th Inf., July i, '41.) (Capt. 8t/i Inf., June 28, '49.) Brevet Capt., September 8, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct in the battle of Molino del Rey,.,Mex. BEAUMONT, EUGENE B. (2d Lt. ifh Cav., May 6, '61.) (Capt. i,th Cav., July 25, '65.) Brevet Capt., November 7, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Rappahannock Station, Va. Brevet Maj., April 2, 1865, for gallant and meritoriour services at the capture of Selma, Ala. Brevet Lt.-Col., April 2, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. TO THE PRESENT TIME. • 3I3 BEAUREGARD, P. G-. T. (2 Lt. 1st Arty., July I, '38.) (Copt. Engrs., Mar. 3, '53.) Brevet Capt., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Cliurubusco. Brevet Maj., September 13, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Chapultepec. BECK, HENRY L. [2dLt. iTfh Inf., Nov. 26, '62.) (Capt. 22d Inf., July 31, '67.) Brevet ist Lt., January 10, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Arkansas Post, Ark. Brevet Capt., July 4, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services during the siege of Vicksburg, Miss. BECK, "WILLIAM B. (zdLt. tfh Arty., Mar. 14, '61.) (Capt. tfh Arty,, Oct. 30, '76.) Brevet ist Lt., May 10, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services in the bat- tle at the crossing of Po River, Va. Brevet Capt., October 27, 1864, for gal- lant and meritorious services in the battle of Boydton Plank Road, Va. Bre- vet Maj., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services in the siege of Petersburg, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. BECKETT, FRANCIS O. (zdLt. \tfh Inf., Apl. 9, '47.) (1st Lt. \tfh Inf., May —, '48.) Brevet ist Lt., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. BECK-WITH, AMOS. (Bvt id Lt. ist Arty., July i, '50.) (Asst. Com. Genl. Subs. (Lt.-Col.), June 23, '74.) Brevet Lt.-Col., September i, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services during the Atlanta Campaign. Brevet Col., September 1, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services in the campaign against Atlanta, Ga. Brevet ]3rig.-Genl., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services in the campaign termina- ting with the surrender of General J. E. Johnston. Brevet Maj.-Genl., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services in the Subsistence Department during the war. BECKA?7ITH, ED-WARD G. (2dLt. id Arty., July i, '42.) (Maj. 2d Arty., Feb. 8, '64.) Brevet Lt.-Col., Brevet Col. and Brevet Brig.-Genl., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. BEE, BARNARD E. (Bvt. 2dLt. zdlnf, July I, '45.) (Capt. \oth Inf., Mar. 3,|'S5.) Brevet ist Lt., April 18, 1847, foi" gallant and meritorious conduct at Cerro Gordo. Brevet Capt., September 13, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Chapultepec. BEEBE, "WILLIAM M. {Capt. lith Inf., Mar. 7, '67.) (Capt. i%th Inf., Mar. 7, '67.) Brevet Maj., March 7, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Stone River, Tenn. BEEBE, WILLIAM S. (2d Lt. Ordn., June li,'6z.) . (ist Lt. Ordn.,''July jo, '63.) Brevet Capt., July 6, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services, and for in- 314 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM I 8 12 trepidity, daring and skill in handling men, in the face of .the enemy. Brevet Maj., August 23, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the siege of Fort Morgan, Ala. BEECHBR, HENRY B. {zdLt. 4//; Arty., Nm. 30, '61.) {,\st-Lt. /^h Arty., Aug. 11, '63.) Brevet Capt., June 3, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Cold Harbor, Va. Brevet Maj., November I, 1865, for faithful and merito- rious services during the war. BELCHER, JOHN H. (A. Q. M. (Capt), yune 16, '66.) (^. Q. M. (Capt.), June 16, '66.) Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for meritorious services in the Quartermaster's Department during the war. BELGER, EDWARD A. (2d Lt. 2d Inf., Mar. 12, '65.) (ist Lt. ^d /n/., Apl. 2^,'$^.) Brevet Capt, March 2, 1867, for gallant services at the battle of Chancellors- ville, Va., May 3, 1863. Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallantry at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa., July 2, 1863. BELGER, JAMES. (2d Lt.l6t/i Inf., Oct. I S, '38. ) ( Q. M. (Maj. ), Aug. 3, '61 . ) Brevet Maj., May 30, 1848, for meritorious conduct in the war with Mexico. BELKNAP, WILLIAM G. (■idLt. 22dlnf., Apl. 5, '13.) , (Lt.-Col. tfh Inf., Sept. 26, '47-) Brevet Maj., February i, 1S32,, for 10 years faithful service in one grade. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 15, 1842, for general good conduct in war against Florida Indians, and for securing bv military operations and negotiations a great number of prisoners. Brevet Col., May 9, 1846, for gallant and distin- guished services at Palto Alto and Resaca de la Palma. Brevet Brig.-Genl., February 23, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Buena Vista. BELL, GEORGE. (Bvt. 2dLt. ifh Arty., July i, '53.) (Com. Subs. (Maj.), Apl. 25, '65.) Brevet Maj., Brevet Lt.-Col., and Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. (Bvt. Brig.-General, April 9, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services in the Subsistence Department during the war. BELL, JACOB B. (Capt. it^th Inf., May 14, '61.) (Capt. \tfh Inf., May 14, '61.) pBrevet Maj., April 7, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Shiloh, Tenn. Brevet Lt.-Col., December 31, 1862, for gallant and merito- rious services at the battle of Stone River, Tenn. (where he was killed.) BELL, JAMES M. (zd Lt. -jth Cav., July 28, '66.) (Capt. -jth Cav., June 25, '76.) Brevet 1st Lt. and Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of the Wilderness, Va. Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Ream's Station, Va. BELL, JOHN. (Asst. Surg., Aug. 26, '61.) (Asst. Surg., Aug. 26, '61.) Brevet Capt. and Brevet Maj., March '13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. TO THE PRESENT TIME. 315 BELIi, JOHN R. (zdLt. Light Arty., Jan. 3, '12.) {Capt. Arty., Oct. 10, '14.) Brevet Maj., Oct. 10, 1824, for 10 years faithful service in one grade. BELL, WILLIAM H. [Bvt. idLt. yllnf., July I, '58.) [Com. Subs. {Capt.), June 11, '62.) Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services in New Mexico. HELTON, FRANCIS S. (zd Lt. Light Drags., Mar. 27, '12.) ( Col. ijth Arty., June 10, '57.) Brevet Col., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. BENDER, GEORGE. (irf Lt. <^h Inf., May IJ, '12.) {M«j- if^ Lnf., Apl. 23, '30.) Brevet Maj., May 13, 1823, for 10 years faithful service in one grade. BENDIRE, CHARLES. [idLt. 2d Inf., May 18, '64.) {Capt. \st Cav., Feb. 21, '73.) Brevet ist Lt, June 11, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Trevillian Station, Va. BENEDICT, ABNEB R. (2dU nth Inf., Aug. s, '61.) (Capt. 4th Inf., June 8, '63.) Brevet Capt., June 27, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gaines's Mills, Va. Brevet Maj., December 13, 1862, for gallant and merit- orious services at the battle of Fredericksburg, Va. BENET, STEPHEN V. {Bvt. 2dLt. Ordn., July I, '49.) {Chf Ord. {Brig.-Genl.), June 23, '74.) Brevet Maj. and Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services in the Ordnance Department. BENHAM, DANIEL W. (2dLt. i&th Inf., Oct. 24, '61.) {Capt. 7th Inf., Feb. 8, '65.) Brevet Capt^ December 31, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Murfreesboro, Tenn. Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the Atlanta campaign. BENHAM, HENRY W. {Bvt. 2dLt. Engrs., July I, '37.) {Col. Engrs., Mar. 7, '67.) Brevet Capt., February 23, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Buena Vista. Brevet Col., July 13, i86i, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Carrick's Ford, Va. Brevet Brig.-Genl., March 13, 1S65, for gallant and meritorious services in the campaign terminating in the surrender of the insurgent army under General Lee. Brevet Maj.-Genl., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the Rebellion. BENJAMIN, SAMUEL N. {2dU. 2d Arty., May 6, '61.) {A. A. G. [Maj.), Mar. 3, '75.) Brevet Maj., August i, 1864, for distinguished and gallant conduct at the battle of Spottsylvania, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for good conduct and gallant services during the war. 3l6 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 BENNETT, ALBERT G. (Addl. Paymaster, Aug. 14, '46.) (Paymaster [Maj.], Mar. 2, '49.) Brevet Lt. Col., Juneau, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct in affair with guerillas at National Bridge, Mex. BENNETT, FRANK T. (2d. Lt. i&th Inf., Feb. 19, '63.) (Capt. gtA Cavalry, Jan. 22, '67.) Brevet ist Lt., June 26, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services in action: at Hoover's pap, Tenn. Brevet Capt., September 20, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Chickamauga, Ga. BENNETT, JOHN^E. (2d Lt. \'}th Inf., Feb. 23, '66.) (\st Lt. 2%th Inf., Feb. 23, '66.) Brevet Capt., Marchj2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Lookout Mountain, Tenn. Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant| and meritorious services in the battle of Franklin, Tenn. Brevet Lt;-Col. March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Nashville, Tenn. BENNETT, JOHN R. {2dLt. \'^h Inf., Apl. 9, '47.) (2 Lt. \tfh Inf., Afl. 9, '47.) Brevet ist Lt., September 13, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Chapultepec. BENTEEN, FREDERICK W. (Capt. 1th Cav., yuly\2%, '66.) (Capt. yth Carv., July 28, '66.) Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of the Osage. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious ser- vices in the charge at Columbus, Ga. Brevet Col., August 13, 1868, for gallant and meritorious, conduct in an engagement with hostile Indians on the Saline River, Kansas, August 13, 1868. BENTON, JAMES G. (Bvt. 2dLt. Ordn., July I, '42.) (Lt.-Col. Ordn., June 23, '74.) Brevet Lt.-Col. and Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services in the_Ordnance Department. BENTZONI, CHARI.es. (2d Lt. I ith Inf., Nm). 20, '61.) ( Capt 2tfh Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet Capt., September 30, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Poplar Spring Church, Va. Brevet Maj. and Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, i865,Jfor gallant and meritorious services during the war. BENYATJRD, VTILLIAM H. H. (1st Lt. Engrs., June 11, '63.) (Capt. Engrs., May I, '66.) Brevet Capt., August i, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services during the campaign before Richmond, Va. Brevet Maj., April i, 1865, for gallant and meritorious serv)ces_at,the battle of Five Forks, Va. BERNARD, REUBEN F. (2dLt. 1st Cav., July 17, '62.) (Capt. 1st Cav., July 28, '66.) Brevet Capt., May 6, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Todd's Tavern, Va. Brevet Maj , August 28, 1864, for gallant and merito- rious services in action at Smithfield, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col. and Brevet Col,, March 13, 1865, fo"^ gallant and meritorious services during the war. TO THE PRESENT TIME 317 BERRY, MATHEW. {isl Lt. ^th Cav., July 28, '66.) [ist Lt. ytk Cav., July 28, '66.) Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Antietam, Va. BEST,i;CLERMONT L. [Bvt. idLt. 1st Arty., yiily I, '47.) (Maj. 1st Arty., Feb. J, '67.) Brevet Maj., May 3, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Chancellorsville, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., July 3, 1863, for gallant andjmerito- rious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for good conduct and gallant services during the war. iBICKER, WALTER, jr. (Ens. 6th Inf., July 29, '13.) (\st Lt. 6 Inf., Sept. I,'l4.) Brevet Capt., September i, 1824, for 10 years faithful service in one grade. BIDDLE, CHARLES J. (Capt. Voltigeurs, Apt. 9, '47.) (Capt. Voltigeurs, Apl. 9, '47.) Brevet Maj., September 13, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Chapultepec. BIDDLE, JAMES. [Capt. 16th Inf., Aug.'i, '61.) (Capt. i6f/i Inf., Aug. 5, '61.) Brevet Maj., September i, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services 'during the Atlanta campaign. BIDDLE, JAMES. (Capt. \tfh Inf., Aug. 5, '61.) (Maj. 6th Cav.,'Feb.'2i;'72-) Brevet Mai., September i, 1862, for'gallant and meritorious services Jat the battle of [Richmond, ^Ky. Brevet Lt.-Col., December 16, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Nashville, Tenn. BIDDLE, THOMAS, Jr. (Capt. of Arty., July 6, '12.) (Paymaster (Major), Rifles, Aug. 7, '20.) Brevet Maj., August 15, 1814, for gallant conduct in the defense of Fort Erie. BIGGS, HERMAN. (Bvt. id Lt. loth Inf., July i, '56.) (A. Q. M. (Capt.), Aug 3, '61.) Brevet Maj., Brevet Lt.-Col., and Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. BILL, JOSEPH H. (Asst. Surg., Apl. 13, '60.) (Surg., July 28, '66.) ^ Brevt Maj. and Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. BILLINGS, JOHN S. (Asst. Surg, Apl. 16, '62.) (Asst. Surg, Apl. 16, '62.) Brevet Capt., Brevet Maj., and Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. BINGHAM, JTJDSON D. (2 Lt. idA^-ty., July i, '54.) (Dep. Q.M. Genl. (Lt. Col.), Mar. 3, '75.) Brevet-Major., Brevet Lt.-Col. and Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful 3l8 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 and meritorious services during the war. Brevet Brig.-Genl., April 9, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services in the field during the war. BIRCH, GEORGZi. {Cornet Light Drags., Dec. 12, '08.) . (Maj. ifh Inf., June 8, '36.) Brevet Maj., August 31, 1826, for 10 years faithful service in one grade. BIRD, CHARLES. ( 2d Lt. I4t& -Inf., May 1 1, '66. ) (ist Lt 2jd Inf., May 23, '67.) Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the bat- tle of Fredericksburg, Va. Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meri- torious services in the battle of Spottsylvania, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Petersburg, Va., June 20, 1864. BIRDSALL, BENJAMIN. (Capt ifh Rifles, Mar. 17, '14.) (Capt. 4*4 Rifles, Mar. 17, '14.) Brevet Maj., August 15, 1814, for gallant conduct at the defense of Fort Erie. BIRNET, JAMES G. {zdLt. z.) (Capt. ifh Inf., Dec. 2\,'(A.) Brevet ist Lt., December 31, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Murfreesboro, Tenn. Brevet Capt., September i, 1864, for gal- lant and meritorious services during the Atlanta Campaign and at the battle of Jonesboro, Ga. BISSELL, CHARLES T. (2d Lt. 2d Arty., Apl. 9, '65.) (ist Lt. zd Arty., JVov. 21 , '6^.) Brevet ist Lt. and Brevet Capt., April 9, 1865, for good conduct and gallant services during the war. BISSELL, DANIEL. (.Ens. 1st Inf., Apl. 11, '92.) (Brig.-Genl., Mar. 9, '14.) Retained, May, 1815, (in reorganization under act of March 3, 1815,) as Colonel, 1st Infantry, with Brevet of Brig.-Genl. from March 9, 1814. BLACK, HENRT M. (Bvt 2d Lt ^h Inf., July i, '47.) (Lt.-Col. \%th Inf., Oct 7, '68.) Brevet Lt-Col., and Brevet Col. March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. BLACKBURN, JAMES. ( \st Lt li^h Inf., Apl. 9, '47.) ( Capt. \6fk Inf., Oct. —, '47.) Brevet Capt., September 13, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Chapultepec. BLAIR, WILLIAM B. (2dLt 2d Arty., July i, '38.) (Com. Subs. (Capt), Sep. 27, '50.) Brevet Capt., April 18, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Cerro Gordo. TO THE PRESENT TIME. 3ig BLAEB, GEORGE A. H. {\stLt 2d Drags., June II, '36.) ' [Col. 1st Cav., Feb. 15, '62.) Brevet Maj., August 17, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct in the affair at San Augustine, Mex. Brevet Brig.-Genl., March 13, 1865, for gallant and efficient services during the Gettysburg Campaign. BLANEY, GEORGE. [Bvt. 2dLt. Engrs. Mar. 4, '15.) {Capt. Engrs., July i, '24.) Brevet Maj., July i, 1834, for 10 years faithful service in one grade. BLISS, ALEXANDER. [A. Q. M. (Capt), Mar. 13, '63.) (A. Q. M. (Capt), Mar. 13, '63.) Brevet Maj., Brevet Lt.-Col. and Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. BLISS, JOHN. (\st Lt wth Inf., Mar. 12, '12.) " (Lt-Col. 6th Inf., Sept 30, '^d.) Brevet Maj., May 13, 1823, for 10 years faithful service in one grade. BLISS, WILLIAM "W. S. (Bvt 2dLt ifh Inf. July i, '33.) (A. A. G. (Bvt Major), July 7, '46.) Brevet Maj., May 9, 1846, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Palo Alto and Resaca de la Palma. Brevet Lt. Col., February'23, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at..Buena Vista. BLISS, ZENAS R. (Bvt. 2dLt istlnf, July I, '54.) (Maj. z^th Inf., Aug. 6, '67.) Brevet Maj., December 13, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Fredericksburg, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., May 7, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of the Wilderness.jVa. BLODGETT, GARDNER S. ( A. Q. M. (Capt), July 2, '64.) (A. Q. M. (Capt), July 2, '64,) Brevet Maj. and Brevet Lt.-Col. March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. BLOODGOOD, EDWARD. (Capt 2Stk Inf., July 28, '66.) (Capt._^t/t Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet Maj. March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the bat- tle of Resaca, Ga. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the Savannah Campaign. BLUE, URIAH. (2d Lt %th Inf., July, 'oo.) . (Maj. y^h Inf., Mar. 13, '14.) Retained, December, 1815 (in reorganization under act of March 3, 1815), as Captain, 8th Infantry, with Brevet of Maj. from March 13, 1814. BLUNT, ASA P. _ (A. Q. M. (Capt), Mar. 28, '67.) (A. Q. M. (Capt), Mar: 28, '67.) Brevet Maj., March 28, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the bat- tle of Lee's Mills, Va., April 16, 1862. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 28, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Savage's Station, Va., June 29, 1862. Brevet Col., March 28, 1867, for meritorious services during the war. 320 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 BLUNT, CHARLES E. (Bvt. 2d Lt. Engrs., July i, '46.) (Lt.-Col. Engrs., Mar. 7, '67.) Brevet Lt.-Col., June 30, i865, for long and faithful services during the war. Brevet Col., June 30, 1866, for meritorious services during the war. BLUNT, MATTHEW M. (Bvt. 2dLt. 1st Arty., July 1, '53.) (Lt.-Col. 2^th Inf., Oct. 7, '64.) Brevet Maj., July i, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Malvern Hill, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., December 13, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Fredericksburg, Va. Brevet Col., June 19, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services in action in front of Petersburg, Va. BOARDMAN, ELIJAH. ^(Cornet Light Drags., June 13, 'oS.) (Capt. Light Drags., Aug. i, '13.) Retained, December, 1815 (in reorganization under act of March 3, 1815), as 1st Lieutenant, 6th Infantry, with Brevet of Capt. from August i 1813. Brevet Maj., March 31, 1827, for 10 years faithful service in one grade BODPISH, CHARLES N. (Capt. <)th Inf., Apl. 9, '47.) ( Capt. <)th Inf., Apl. 9, '47.) Brevet Maj., August 20, 1847, f'"' gallant and meritorious conduct at Contre- ras and Churubusco. BOGLE, ARCHIBALD. {\st Lt. y)th Inf., May 21, '67.) (ist Lt. yjth Inf., May 21, '67.) Brevet Capt., May 21, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the bat- tle of Olustee, Fla. BOIES, JUSTUS W. (\stLt ijth Inf., May 14, '61.) {ist Lt. 13M Inf., May 14, '61.) Brevet Capt., June 28, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services in action in front of Vicksburg, Miss. BOMFORD, GEOROE. {2d Lt. Engr., July i, -05.) (Col. Ordn., May 30, '32.) Brevet Lt.-Col., December 22, 1814, for distinguished services in the Ord- nance Department. Brevet Col., February 9, 1825, for 10 years faithful ser- vice in one grade. BOMFORD, GEORGE N. (2d Lt ^th Inf., Nov. 12, '64.) ( \st Lt. \Zth Inf., Nov. 12, '64.) Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the bat- tle of Antietam, Md. Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Fredericksburg, Va. BOMFORD, JAMBS V. (Bvt. 2d Lt. 2d Inf., July i , '32.) ( Col. %th Inf., May 18, '64.) Brevet Maj., Aug. 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Contreras and Churubusco. Brevet Lt.-Col., September 8, 1847, for gallant and merito- rious conduct atMolino del Key. Brevet Col., October 8, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Perryville, Ky. Brevet Brig.-Genl., March 13, 1865, for faithful and efficient services. TO THE PRESENT TIME. 321 BONNEVILLE, BENJAMIN L. E. [fivt. 2d Lt. Light Arty., Dec. 1 1, ' i S- ) {Col. -^d Inf., Feb. 3, '55. ) Brevet Lt.-Col., August 20 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Contreras and Cliurubusco. Brevet Brig.-Genl., March 13, 1865, for long and faithful services in the army. BOOTES, LEVI C. (Bvt. idLt. 6th Inf., June 28, '48.) (Lt.-Col. ztjth Inf., Jan. i, '71.) Brevet Maj., July i, 1S62, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Balvern Hill, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., December 13, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Fredericksburg, Va. Brevet Col., July 2, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. BOSWELL, BENJAMIN D. [idLt. 2i)th Inf., June 18, '67.) (2d Lt. wth Inf., June 18, '67.) Brevet ist Lt, June 18, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the siege of Vicksburg, Miss. Brevet Capt., June 18, 1867, for meritorious servi- ces during the war. BOURNE, WILLIAM R. (idLt. i,2dlnf., July 28, '66.) (\st Lt. ^2d Inf., Sept. 10, '68.) Brevet ist Lt, March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. BOWEN, ISAAC. (Bvt. 2dLt. ifh Arty., July I, '42.) (Com. Subs. (Capt.), Sept. 27, 50.) Brevet ist Lt., September 23, 1846, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Monterey. Brevet Capt, February 23, 1847, for gallant and meritorious con- duct at Buena Vista. BOWEN, NICOLAS. (Bvt. 2d Lt. Top. Engrs., Jidy. i, '60.) (Maj. Engrs., Mar. 7, '67.) Brevet Capt., May 24, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services during the reconnoissance near New Bridge, Va. Brevet Maj., November 25, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services during the siege of Knoxville, Tenn. Brevet Lt-Col., June 3, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Cold Harbor, Va. Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. BOWERS, GEORGE. (istLt. ^th Inf., Apl. 9, '47.) (Capt. gth Inf., Dec. '47.) . Brevet Capt., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. BOWTiRS, THEODORE S. (A. Q. M. (Capt.), July 29, '64.) (A. A. G. (Maf), Jan. 6, '65.) Brevet Lt.-Col. and Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. Brevet Brig.-Genl., April 9, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services in the field during the war. BOWIE, GEORGE W. (ist Lt. lyA Inf., Apl. 9, '47.) (Capt. itfh Inf., July, '47.) Brevet Maj., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. IS 322 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 BOWivcAigr, andhew. {Bvt. 2d Lt. 1st Inf., July i, '41.) [Lt.-Col. t,\H Inf., June 6, '67. ) Brevet Capt., April 18, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Cerro Gordo. BOTVMAN, CHARLES S. (Bvt. zdLt. sfh Cav., July i, '60.) (Capt. 6fh Cav., July 17, '62.) Brevet Maj., February 20, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services on the cavalry expedition into Mississippi. BOYD, ATTGUSTUS. (\st Lt. igth Inf., May 14, '61.) (A. Q. M. (Capt.), May 30, '61.) Brevet Maj., October 10, 1864, for faithful and valuable services during the war. Brevet Lieut-Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and valuable services during the war. BOYD, CARULE. (Capt. 44tA Inf., July 28, '66.) (Capt. ijtk Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gaines's Mills, Va. Brevet Lieut. -Col.,' March 2, 1867, for gallant and meri- torious services at the battle of Groveton, Va. BOYU!, JAMES H. (2dLt. Marines, June 28, '09.) (Capt. of Arty., July 6, '12.) Brevet Maj., May 5, 1814, for gallant conduct in defence of Fort Oswego, N. Y. BOYNTON, BENJAMIN A. (2 Lt. 2<)tk Inf., Apl. 30, '13.) (Capt. 2d Inf., Jan. 8, '23.) Brevet Maj., January 8, 1833, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. BOYNTON, EDV?'ARD C. (Bvt. 2d Lt. 2d Arty., July i, '46w) ( Capt. 2<^h Inf., Sept. 23, '61.) Brevet Capt., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faithful services during the war. BRACEETT, ALBERT G. (Capt. 2d Cav., Mar. 3, '55.) {Lt.-Col. 2d Cav., June 9, '68.) Brevet Maj., June 28, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services in the cam- paign of 1862 in Arkansas. Brevet Lt.-Col., September i, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services during the Atlanta campaign. Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. BRADFORD, JAMES H. (2dLt. 17M Inf., Nov. 18, '62.) (Capt. 19 Inf., Dec. I, '65.) Brevet Capt., August l, 1864, for gallant services at the battle of Spottsyl- vania and during the campaign before Richmond, Va. BRADFORD, THOMAS C. (Bvt. zdLt. Ordn., June 24, '61.) (Capt. Ordn., Mar. 3, '63.) Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services in the Ordnance Department. TO THE PRESENT TIME. 323 BHADFORD, WILLIAM. (Capt. \-]th Inf., Mar. 12, '12.) [Maj. 21st Inf., Aug. 20, '14.) Retained, May, 1815 (in reorganization under act of March 3, 1815), as cap- tain, Rifles, with Brevet of Maj. from August 20, 1814. BRADLEir, HBZBKIAH. [Em. 2d Inf., Dec. 12, '08.) (Capt. 2 Inf., Apl. 19, '14.) Brevet Maj., April 19, 1824, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade BRADLET, JOHN. {i.dLt. dth Inf., Jatw 20, '20.) (\st Lt. 2d Inf., Oct. 2, '22.) Brevet Capt., October 2, 1832, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. BRADLEY, LUTHER P. (Lt.-Col 2yth Inf., July 28, '66.) [Lt.-Col. <)th Inf., July 28, '(&.) Brevet Col., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Chickamauga, Ga. Brevet Brig.-Genl., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meri- torious services at the battle of Resaca, Ga. BRADLEY, THOMAS H. (2dLt. ut/i Inf., May 11, '66.) • (\st Lt. 2\th Inf., Aug. 12, '68.) Brevet ist Lt. and Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. BRADLEY, "WILLIAM A. (Asst. Surg., Oct. 22, '61.) {Asst. Surg., Oct. 22, '61.) Brevet Capt. and Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. BRADY, GEORGE K. (istU. \ifh Inf., May 14, '61.) (Capt. i-^d Inf., June 10, '64.) Brevet Maj., August 18, 1864, for gallant services during the operations on the Weldon R. R., Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meri- torious services during the war. BRADY, HUGH. [Ens. Inf., '92.) [Col. 22d Inf., July 6, '12.) Brevet Brig.-Genl., July 6, 1822, for 10 years' faithful service in one'grade. Brevet Maj.-Genl., May 30, 1848, for meritorious conduct. BRADY, JOHN. [Em. 22d Inf., Mar. 31, '14.) (2d Lt. 22d Inf., Sept. '14.) Brevet ist Lt., February 5, 1815, for gallant conduct. BRAGG, BRAXTON. [2dLt. 3d Arty., July 1, '37.) (Capt. 3d Arty., June 18, '46.) Brevet Capt., May 9, 1846, for gallant and distinguished conduct in defense of Fort Brown, Tex. Brevet Maj., September 23, 1846, for gallant conduct at Monterey. Brevet Lt.-Col., February 23, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Buena Vista. BRAINARD, THOMAS C. [Asst. Surg, Aug 5, '61.) (Asst. Surg, Aug 5, '61.) Brevet Capt. and Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. 324 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 BRANAGAN, PATRICK. {2dLt. 1st Inf., Feb. 19, '63.) (1st Lt. 1st Inf., Dec. 29, '65.) Brevet ist Lt., July 4, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services during the siege of Vicksburg, Miss. BRAND, THOMAS T. (1st Lt. i%th Inf., May 14, '61.) (Capt. iZth Inf., Sept. 11, '63.) Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the battles of Stone River, Tenn., and Chickamauga, Ga. BRANNAN, JOHN M. (Bvt. 2dLt. 1st Arty., July i, '41.) (Maj. 1st Arty., Aug. I, '63.) Brevet Capt., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. Brevet Lt.-Col., September 25, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at Jacksonville, Fla. Brevet Col., September 20, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Chickamauga, Ga. Brevet Brig.-Genl., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services in the cam- paign against Atlanta, Ga. Brevet Maj.-Genl., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services in the field during the war. BRANT, JOSHUA B. (Ens. zyllnf., July 15, '14.) (Dep. Q. M. Genl. (Lt.-Col.), July 7, '38.) Brevet ist Lt., September 17, 1814, for gallant conduct in the sortie from Fort Erie. BRAYTON, GBORGB M. (istLt. itfh Inf., May 14, '6i.) (Capt. %th Inf., Jan. 3, '63.) Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Missionary Ridge, Tenn. BRBARLEY, DAVID. (Capt. Light Drags., May 3, '08.) (Col. 15M Inf., Mar. 12, '13.) Retained, January I, 1816 (in reorganization under act of March 3, 1815), as Lt.-Col., 7th Infantry, with Brevet of Col. from March 12, 1813. BRBCE, SAMUEI.. (Bvt 2dLt 1st Arty., July i, '55.) (A. A. G. (Maj.), July 17, '62.) Brevet Lt.-Col., September 24, 1864, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. Brevet Col. and Brevet Brig.-Genl., March 13, 1865, for dili- gent, faithful and meritorious services in the Adjutant-General's Department during the war. BRBCKINRIDGB, JOSEPH C. (2dLt. 2d Arty., Apl. 14, '62.) (Capt. 2d Arty., June 17, '74.) Brevet Capt, July 22, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle in front of Atlanta, Ga. Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for gallant and merito- rious services during the war. BRENEMAN, EDWARD DE W. (Asst. Surg-., Apl. 16, '62.) (Asst. Surg., Apl. 16, '62.) Brevet Capt. and Brevet Maj., March 31, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. TO THE PRESENT TIME. 32$ BKENT, THOMAS L. (Bvt. 2dLt. M Inf., July i, '35.) {A. Q. M. (Capt), Mar. 3, '47.) Brevet Capt., February 23, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Buena Vista. BRERETON, THOMAS J. {Bvt. 2dLt. ^th Arty., July i, '43.) {Capt. Ordn., July i, '57.) Brevet 1st Lt., May 9, 1846, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Palo Alto and Resaca de la Palma. BREWER, JOHN W. {Asst. Surg., Nov. 22, '62.) • {Asst. Surg., Nov. 22, '62.) Brevet Capt. and Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. BREWERTON, HENRY. {Bvt. 2dLt. Engrs., July i, 'ig.) {Col. Engrs , Apl. 22, '64.) Brevet Brig.-Genl., March 13, 1865, for long, faithful and meritorious ser- vices. BREWERTON, HENRY P. {2dLt. tfh Arty., May 14, '61.) {Capt. tfh Arty., Sept. 18, '68.) Brevet Capt, October ig, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Cedar Creek, Va. BRE"V7STER, CHARLES. {2dLt. ^th Cav., July 28, '66.) {1st Lt. ^th Cav., Feb. 24, '67.) Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. BREYPOGLB, ROLAND C. {2dLt. 12th Inf., July 28, '66.) {2d Lt. 12th Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet 1st Lt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the bat- tle of Spottsylvania, Va. BRICE, BENJAMIN W. (Bvt 2dLt. yilnf., July i, '29.) {Paymaster Genl. (Brig.-Genl.), July 28, '66.) Brevet Lt.-Col., Brevet Col. and Brevet Brig.-Genl., December z, 1864. No service Stated. Brevet Maj.-Genl., March 13, 1865, for meritorious and distmguished services in the Pay Department during the war. BRIGHAM, ELIJAH D. (Capt Subs.Dept., Feb. g, '63.) (Capt. Subs. Dept, Feb. 9, '63.) Brevet Maj. and Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. BRIGHTLY, CHARLES H. (Bvt 2dLt. Afh Inf., June 24, '61.) (Capt; sfk Inf., Sept. 16, '62.) ■ Brevet Maj., May 3, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Chancellorsville, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., May 5, 1864, for gallant and merito- rious services at the battle of the Wilderness, Va. BRIMHALL, ELISHA. (Ens. cfhinf., Dec. 4, '13.) {xst Lt. <)th Inf., Sept. I, '14.) •^Retained, January, 1816 (in reorganization under act of March 3, 1815), as 2Q Lt. Artillery, with Brevet of ist Lt. from September i, 1814. 326 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 BRINCE:L£!, JOHN R. (zd Lt. lih Arty., May 14, '61.) (Capt. yih Arty., Oct. 7, '74.) Brevet Capt., April 6, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the bat tie of Sailor's Creek, Va. Brevet Maj., April 9, 1865, for gallant and merito- rious services in the campaign terminating with the surrender of General Lee. BRUTDLBY, RICHARD. (zif Lt. zd Inf., May 3, '61.) (,Capt. 2d Inf., — , — .) Brevet Maj., June 27, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gaines's Mills, Va. ERINTON, JEREMIAH B. {Asst. Surg., Apl. 16, '62.) (Asst. Surg., Apl. 16, '62.) Brevet Capt. and Brevet Maj. March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. BRISBIN, JAIOES S. (2dLt. 1st Brags., Apl. 26, '61.) {Maj. zd Cav., Jan. i, '68.) Brevet Maj., June 9, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Beverly Ford, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., December 19, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services in action at Marion, Tenn. Brevet Col., March 13,1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. BRISTOL, HENRTB. (zd Lt. ifh Inf., May 1 5, '57.) (Capt. tfh Inf., June r, '62.) Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services in New Mexico. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13 1865, for faithful and meritorious services in New Mexico, and particularly for his untiring zeal and energy in controlling the Navajoe tribe of Indians at the Bosque Redondo, and for his praiseworthy efforts in advancing their condition from that of savages to that of civilized men. ' BRITTON, THOMAS. (zd Lt. 6th Inf., Nov. 18, '62.) ' (Capt. 6th Inf., Mar. i, '72.) Brevet ist Lt., July 2, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Capt., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. BROATCH, "WILLIAM J. (zdLt. lothlnf, May 18, '64.) (Capt. 40th Inf., July 28, '65.) Brevet ist Lt., October i, 1S64, for gallant services at the battle of Chapel House, Va. BRODHEAD, DANIEL M. (1st Lt. 14th Inf., May 14, '61.) (1st Lt. lifh Inf. May 14, '61.) Brevet Capt., May 5, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of the Wilderness, Va. BRODHEAD, THORNTON P. (1st Lt. iith Inf., Apl. 9, '47.) (Capt. itfh Inf., Dec. — , '47-) Brevet Capt, August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. •^i TO THE PRESENT TIME. 327 BHONAUGH, JOHN M. {idLt. I2th Inf., Apl. 9, '47.) (2d Lt. \2th Inf., Apt. 9, '47.) Brevet ist Lt., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. BROOKE, GEORGE M. (irf Lt. StA Inf., Mar. 3, '08.) {Col. tjtk Inf., July 15, '31.) Brevet Lt.-Col., August 15, 1814, for gallant conduct in the defense of Fort Erie. Brevet Col., September 17, 1814, for distinguished and meritorious ser- vices in the sortie from Fort Erie. Brevet Brig.-Genl., September 17, 1824, for 10 years faithful service in one grade. Brevet Maj.-Genl., May 30, 1848, for meritorious conduct in the war with Mexico. BROOKE, JOHN. (Asst. Surg., Nov. 22, '62.) M-f-f'- Surg., Nov. 22, '62.) Brevet Capt. and Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. BROOKE, JOHN R. (,Lt.-Col. nth Inf., July 28, ''65.) (Lt.-Col. 3d Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet Col., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Brig.-Genl., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritor- ious services at the battle of Spottsylvania, C. H., Va. BROOKS, ALEXANDER S. {ut Lt Light Arty., May 3, '08.) {Lt.-Col. ifh Arty., Apl. 6, '35.) Brevet Maj., September ii, 1814, for gallant conduct at the battle of Platts- burg. BROOKS, EDWARD. {Asst. Surg., Aug. 19, '62.) ■ (Asst. Surg., Aug. -19, '62.) Brevet Capt. and Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. BROOKS, HORACE. {Bvt. td Lt. 2d. Arty., July I, '35.) {Col. ifh Arty., Aug. i, '63.) Brevet ist Lt., December 31, 1835, for gallant and good conduct in war against Florida Indians. Brevet Maj., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Contreras and Churubusco. Brevet Lt.-Col., September 8, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Molino del Rey. Brevet Brig.-Genl., March 13, 1865, for meritorious services during the war. BROOKS, WILLIAM T. H. {Bvt. 2dLt. 3d. Inf., July I, '41.) {Maj. iBth Inf., Mar. 12, '62.) Brevet Capt., September 23, 1846, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Monterey. Brevet Maj., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Contreras and Churubusco. BROTHERTON, DAVID H. {Bvt. 2dLt. tfh Inf., July i, '54.) {Capt. tfh Inf., Sept. 25, '61.) Brevet Maj., February 21, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Valverde, N. M. 328 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 BRO'WKr, A. BENSON. (irf Lt. 43d Inf., July 28, '66.) (^st. Lt. 43d Inf., July 28,3*66.) Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the bat- tle of Drury's Bluff, Va. BRO'VTN, FREDERICK H. (2dLt. \?,th Inf., Oct. 30, '61.) (Capt. i%th Inf., May 15, '66.) Brevet Capt., September i, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services during the Atlanta Campaign. BROWN, HACHALIAH. [Bvt. 2d Lt. 4tk Arty., July i, '42.) {\st Lt. ^d Arty., Mar. 3, '47.) Brevet Capt., March 25, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct in the affair at Medelin, Mex. BROWN, HARVEY. (2dLt. Light Arty., July 24, '18.) (Col. tfh Arty., May 14, '61.) Brevet Capt., August 23, 1831, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. Brevet Maj., November 21, 1836, for gallant conduct on several occasions, and general efficiency in the war against Florida Indians. Brevet Lt.-Col., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct in the battle of Contreras. Bre- vet Col., September 13, 1847, for gallant conduct at the gate of Belen, City of Mexico. Brevet Brig.-Genl., November 23, 1861, for gallant and good conduct during the engagement of Nov. 22 and 23, 1861, between Fort Pickens and the rebel batteries. Brevet Maj.-Genl., August 2, 1866, for distinguished services in the suppression of riot in New York City. BROAATN, HARVEY E. (As^t. Surg., Apt. 13, '63.) (Asst. Surg., Apt. 13, '63.) Brevet Capt. and Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. BROWN, HUGH G. (T.dLt. iZth Inf., May 2, '66.) (\st Lt. 11th Inf., Nov. 25, '66. Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the siege of Vicksburg, Miss. Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the capture of Fort Harrison, Va. BROWN, JAMES D. (Ens. 2t)th Inf., Jan. 22, '13.) (ist Lt z^th Inf., May 2, '14.) Retained, December, 181 5 (in reorganization under act of March 3, 1815), as 2d Lt. Artillery, with Brevet of 1st Lt. from May 2, 1814. BROWN, JAMES P. (2dLt. it^th Inf., Aug. 10, '63.) (Capt. 15/^ Inf., Aug. 15, '67.) Brevet ist Lt., September 20, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Chickamauga, Ga. BROWN, JOSEPH B. (Asst. Surg., June 29, '49.) (Surg. (Major), July 4, '61.) Brevet Lt. Col. and Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. Brevet Brig.-Genl., September 28, 1866, for meritori- ous and distinguished services at Fort Columbus where cholera prevailed. TO THE PRESENT TIME. 329 BROWN, JUSTUS M. {Asst. Surg., July 11, '62.) {Asst. Surg., July 11, '62.) - Brevet Capt. and Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. BROWN, LUCIUS F. {idLt \%th Inf., June 9, '62.) {\st Lt. lith Inf., Jan. 14, '63.) Brevet Capt., September 19, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Chickamauga, Ga. BROWN, NATHAN W. (Paymaster (Maj.), Sept. 5, '49.) (Asst. Paymaster-Genl. (Col), July 28, '66.) ■ Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. Brevet Brig.-Genl., October 15, 1867, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. BROW^N, W^ILLIAM H. (Capt. li^h Inf., May 14, '61.) (Maj. \%th Inf., Aug. 16, '71.) Brevet Maj., September 17, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Antietam, Md. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. BROWN, WILLIAM H. (zd Lt. nth Inf., May 14, '61.) (Capt. tfh Cav., April i, '65.) Brevet Capt., June 18, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services during the Piedmont and Lynchburg expedition. Brevet Maj., April I, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Five Forks, Va. BROWNING, W^ILLIAM. (Ens. <)th Inf., Mar. 12, 'i2.) (Capt. t)th Inf., Oct. 31, '14.) Retained, May, 1815 (in reorganization under act of March 3, 1815), as 1st Lt., 2d Infantry, with Brevet of Capt. from October 31, 1814. BROWNSON, HENRY F. (2d Lt. 3rf Arty., Dec. i, '61.) (Capt. 43d Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet Capt., July i, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Malvern Hill, Va. Brevet Maj., May 3, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Chancellorsville, Va. BRUA, JOHN P. (Paymaster (Maj.), Feb. 23, '64.) (Paymaster (Maj.), Feb. 23, '64.) Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. BRUNTON, WILLIAM B. (zdLt. ^th. Cav., June 18, '67.) (ist Lt. th Inf., May 25, '67.) (ist Lt. ith Inf., May 10, '73.) Brevet ist Lt., May 25, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Antietam, Md. Brevet Capt., May 25, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. 332 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 BURNETT, ROBERT L. {is( Lt. \2th Inf., May 14, '61.) (Capt. 12th Inf., Dec. 24, '64.) Brevet Capt., June 27, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gaines's Mills, Va. Brevet Maj., July 2„i863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. BURNHAM, ARTHUR H. (istLt. ofEngrs.,.yune 13, '64.) {Capt. Engrs., Mar. 6, '67.) Brevet Capt,, August 23, 1864, for highly meritorious services at the sieges of Forts Gaines and Mprgan, Ala. Brevet Maj., March 26, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the campaign against the city of Mobile and its defences. BURNS, GEORGE H. {id Lt. \lth Inf., Nov. 12, '61.) (irf Lt. \tfh Inf., Dec. 22, 'di.) Brevet Capt., December 31, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Murfreesboro, Tenn. BURNS, WILLIAM. (ist Lt. 44t& Inf., July 28, '66.) (\st Lt. /^tfh Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of White Oak Swamp, Va. BURNS, WILLIAM W. t^Brev. 2dLt. t^ Inf., July I, '46.) i,Asst. Com. Gen. Subs. {Lt.-Col.), June 23, '74.) Brevet Lt.-Col., June 29, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Savage Station. Brevet Col., June 30, 1862, for gallant and meri- torious services at the battle of Glendale, Va. Brevet Brig.-Genl., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. BURROUGHS, GEORGE. (2d Lt. Engrs., June 17, '62.) (Capt. Engrs., June 5, '64.) Brevet Capt , September 20, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Chickamauga, Ga. Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the Vfar. BURRO WES, THOMAS B. (is/. Lt. iSt/i Inf., May 14, '61.) (Capt. <)th Inf., Nov. 13, '63.) Brevet Maj., September i, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Jonesboro, Ga. BURT, ANDREW S. (\st Lt. \%th Inf., May 14, '61.) (Capt. gth Inf., May 30, '63.) Brevet Capt, June 19, 1862, for gallant at d meritorious services at the bat- tle of Mill Springs, Ky. Brevet Maj., September I, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services during the Atlanta campaign and at the battle of Jones- borough, Ga. BURTON, HENRY S. (2d Lt. 2id Arty., July I, '39.) (Col. ^th Arty., Aug. 11, '63.) Brevet Brig.-Genl., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the capture of Petersburg, Va. TO THE PRESENT TIME. 333 BUSH, EDWARD G. (Bvt. id Lt. 6th Inf., July i, '59.) [Capt. lath Inf., Mar. 13, '63.) Brevet Maj., July 2, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. BUSH, JOSEPH. (Cap. iTfh Inf., Aug. 5, '61.) {Capt. zzd Inf., Aug. 5, '61.) Brevet Maj., July 4, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services during the siege of Vicksburgh, Miss. BUTLER, JAMES. (2d Lt. 2d Inf., Nov. 26, '62.) (ist Lt. zd Inf., JVov. 16, '63.) . Brevet ist Lt., May, 3, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the bat- tle of Chancellorsville, Va. Brevet Capt., July 2, 1863, for gallan', and meri- torious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. BUTLER, JOHN G. (2d Lt. ifh Arty., June 11, '63.) (Capt. Ordn., June 23, '74. Brevet ist Lt., September 20, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Chickamauga, Ga. BUTLER, JOHN H. (2d Lt. 2d Arty., M.iy 22, '61.) (Capt. \2d Inf., Ji.n. 22, '67.) Brevet Capt., June 30, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the bat- tle of Glendale, Va. Brevet Maj., November 8, 1863, for gallant and meri- torious services in action near Culpeper C. H., Va. BUTLER, ROBERT. (Capt. 2ifh Inf., Mar. 12, '12.) (Adjt. Genl. (Col.), March 5, '14.) Brevet Lt.-Col., December 23, 1814, for gallant conduct at the siege of New Orleans. BUTLER, THOMAS L. (2d Lt. Light Arty., April 13, '09.) (Capt. 2%th Inf., May 20, '13.) Brevet Maj , January 8, i8i5,for gallant conduct at the siege of New Orleans. BUTLER, WILLIAM O. (Ens. 2d Inf., Sept. 28, '12.) (Capt. 4^h Inf., Apl. $th, '13.) - Brevet Maj., December 13, 1814, for gallant coiWuct at the siege of New Orleans. BUTTERFIELD, DANIEL. {Lt.-Col. 12th Inf., May 14, '61.) (Col. ^th Inf., July i, '63.) Brevet Brig.-Genl., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services ■during the war. Brevet Maj. -Genl., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meri- torious services in the field during the war. BUTTERFIELD, SHUBAEL. (Ens. ifh Inf., Jan. 3, '12.) [ist. Lt. ifh Inf., Feb. 21, '14.) Retained, January, 18 16 .(in reorganization under act of March 3, 1815), as 2dLt. 5th Infantry, with Brevet of ist Lt. from February 21, 1814. 334 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 BYBRS, JOSEPH K. (ist. Lt. i,zdliif.. Mar. 7, '67.) {\st. Lt. ^2d Inf., Mar. 7, '67.) Brevet Capt., March 7, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle oE Fredericksburg, Va. Brevet Maj., March 7, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. BYRD, FRANCIS O. {zd Lt. zd Arty., July 2, '12.) (\st. Lt. of Arty., Aug. 30, '16.) Brevet ist Lt. February zo, 1815, for distinguished and meritorious services. BYRNE, CHARLES C. (Asst. Surg., June 23, '60.) {.Stirg., July 28, '66.) Brevet Maj. and Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meri- torious services during the war. BYRNE, THOMAS. {2d Lt 2d Inf., July l8, '62.) (Capt. 12th Inf., Aug. 15, '67.) Brevet Capt., July 2, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. CADWALADER, GEORGE. (Brig.-Genl, Mar. 3, '47.) (Brig.-Genl., Mar. 3, '47.) Brevet Maj.-Genl., September 13, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at ChapuUepec. CADY, ALBEMARLE. (Bvt. 2d Lt. 6th Inf., July i, '29.) (Col. Sth Inf., Oct. 20, 63.) Brevet Maj., September 8, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Molino del Rey. Brevet Brig.-Genl., March 13, 1865, for long and faithful services in the army. CAHILL, JAMES. (2d Lt. 2d Cav., Aug. 10, '63.) (Capt. 2d Cav. .) Brevet ist. Lt. May, 6, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the bat- tle of Todd's Tavern, Va. CAIN, AVERY B. (2d Lt. ^h Inf., Aug. 5, '61.) (Capt. ifh Inf., Oct. ig, '63.) Brevet Capt., May 3, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Chancellorsville, Va. Brevet Maj., May 24, 1864, for gallant and meri- torious services at the battle of North Anna River, Va. CAIN, WILLIAM J. (2dLt. id Inf., Feb. 19, '63.) (\st Lt. 3d Cav., Oct. 9, '65.) Brevet 1st Lt, November 15, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services in action near Tuscumbia, Ala. Brevet Capt., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Mission Ridge and in the Atlanta cam- paign. CALD-WELL, GEORGE A. (Q. M. M.ij.), June 26, '46.) (Q. M. (Maj.), June z6, '46.) Brevet Lt.-Col., September 13, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Chapultepec. TO THE PRESENT TIME. 335 CALDWELIi, JAMES N. {Bvt. 2d /J. 2d/n/., July i, '40.) (Miy. \Wi Inf., Feb. 27, '62. ) Brevet Lt.-Col., December 31, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Murfreesboro, Tenn. CALBP, JOHN H. {id Lt. Ith Arty., June 17, '62.) (Capt. 2d. Arty., Mir. 16, '75.) Brevet Capt., July 6, 1864, for gallant and good conduct at Gettysburgh, and in the Campaign from the Rapidan to Petersburg. Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for good conduct and gallant services during the war. CALHOUN, JAMES T. (AssL Sursf., Apl. 13, '63.) [Asst. Surg., Apt. 13, '63.) Brevet Capt. and Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services? during the war. Brevet Lt.-Col., July i9i '866, for distinguished and meritorious services at Hart's Island, N. Y., where cholera prevailed. CALL, RICHARD K. (\stLt. i,ijthlnf., July 15, '14.) [Capt. 1st Inf., July I, 'l8.) Brevet Capt, November 7, 18 14, for gallant conduct at Pensacola and New Orleans. CALLAHAN, CHARLES M. (2dLt yi Arty., Feb. 23, '66.) [ist It. ifh Cav., July 28, '66.) Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the bat- tle of Bentonville, N. C. CALLEHAN, JAMES. [2d Lt. Afh Cav., Aug. 10, '63.) {1st Lt. ^th Cav., July 25, '65.) Brevet ist Lt. December i6, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services in pursuit of rebel forces under General Hood. Brevet Capt., April 2, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the capture of Selma, Ala. Brevet Maj., April 2, 1865, for gallantry during the pursuit of Hood after the battle of Nashville, and in the charge of his regiment against the earthworks at Selma, Ala. CALLENDER, FRANKLIN D. [Bvt. 2dLt. Ordn., July I, '39.) [Col. Ordn., Jidy 3, '71.) Brevet ist Lt., May i, 1842, for active and highly meritorious services in war against Florida Indians. Brevet Capt., August 20. 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Contreras and Churubusco. Brevet Maj , April 14, 1862, for faithful and meritorious services in his department. Brevet Lt.-Col , March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the siege of Corinth, Miss. Brevet Col, March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services in the Ordnance Department at St. Louis, Mo. Brevet Brig.-Genl., April 9, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services in the Ordnance Depart- ment. CALLIS, JOHN P. {Capt. i,tfhlnf.. Mar. 7, '67.) [Capt 45^// Inf., Mar. 7, '67.) Brevet Maj., March 7, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. 336, BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 CAMP, ELISHA B. (^2dU. ^tJi Inf;, May 14, '57.) (A. Q. M. (Capt), Aug. 3, '6r.) Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful services during the war. CAMP, ERSEINE M. (ist Lt. Aflth Inf., June 10, '67.) [\st Lt. ipth Inf., June 10, '67.) Brevet Capt., June 10, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Cedar Mountain, Va. CAMPBELL, CHARLES H. (zdLt. et/i Cav., July 25, '66.) [Capt. dth Cav., Sept. 20, '74-) Brevet ist Lt. and Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Petersburg, Va. CAMPBELL, HENRV M. (id Lt. of Arty., July 19, '13.) (2d Lt. of Arty., Oct. 12, '13.) Brevet Ist Lt,, July 5, 1814, for distinguished services at the battle of Chip- pewa. Brevet Capt., July 25, 1814, for distinguished services at the battle of Niagara Falls. CAMPBELL, JOHN. (Asst. Surg., Dec. 13, '47.) (Surg. (Maj.), May 21, '61.) Breevet Lt.-Col. and Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious strvices during the war. CAMPBELL, JOHN A. zd Lt. tfh Arty., Oct. 10, '67.) (2d Lt tfh Arty., Oct. 10, '67.) Brevet ist Lt., October 10, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services during the war, especially in the battle of Shiloh, Tenn. Brevet Captain, Oct. 10, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services during the war, especially in the battle of Stone River, Tenn. Brevet Maj., October to, 1867, for gallant and metritorious Services during the war, especially in the battle of Resaca, Ga. Brevet Lt-Col., October 10, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services during the war, especially in the battle of Franklin, Tenn. CAMPBELL, JOHN B. (Lt.-Col. igth Inf., Mar. 12, '12.) (Col. wth Inf., April<), '14.) Brevet Col., December iS, 1812, for gallant conduct at the battle of Mis- sissinewa. CAMPBELL, JOSEPH B. (Bvt. zdLt. ^th Arty., June2S„ '61.) (Capt. ifh Art, Feb. 5, '67.) Brevet Captain, August 30, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Bull Run (2d) Va. Brevet Maj., September 17, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Antietam, Md. CAMPBELL, REUBEN P. (2d Lt. 2d Drags., July 1, '40.) (Capt. 2d Drags., Aug 8, '51.) Brevet Capt., Feb. 23, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Buena Vista. CANBY, ED'WARD R. S. (2d Lt 2d Inf., July I, '39.) (Brig.-Genl., July 28, '65.) Brevet Maj., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Centre- TO THE PRESENT TIME. 337 ras and Churubiisco. Brevet Lt.-Col., September 13, 1847, for gallant conduct at Belen Gate of the city of Mexico. Brevet Brig.-Genl., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Valverde, N. M. Brevet Maj. Genl., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services in the capture of Fort Blakely and Mobile, Ala. CANBY, SAMUEL. {id Lt. Afh Arty., Oct. 21, '6l.) [ist Lt. ifh Arty., Aug. J, '62.) Brevet ist Lt., April 7, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Shiloh, Tenn. Brevet Capt., July 3, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Maj., Mar. 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Franklin, Tenn. CANTON, THOMAS M. {idLt. 2^k Inf., July 28, '66.) (2d Lt. z^th Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet ist Lt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Spottsylvania, Va. Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Reams' Station, Va. CAPRON, ADIN B. (\st Lt Sig. Corp, Mar. 3, '63.) [\st Lt. Sig. Corp, Mar. 3, '63.) Brevet Capt., December 5, 1864, for faithful and meritorious services. " CARAHER, ANDREW P. {,\stLt. ^z. 338 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 ville, N.C. Brevet Maj.-Genl., March 13, 1865, £or gallant and meritorious services in the field during the war. CARLING, ELIAS B. (Bvt. 2d Lt. 2d Arty., July i, '59.) (A. Q. M. (Capt.), Aug. 20, '62.) Brevet Maj. and Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for valuable and faithful services as Chief Qaartennaster of the Cavalry of the Military Division of the Mississippi. CARIiISLIi, JOSIAH H. (Bvt. 2d Lt. 2d Arty., July I, '45.) {,Capt. 2d Arty., Mar. 3, '57.) Brevet Maj., July I, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services during the Peninsular Campaign in Virginia. CARLTON, CALEB H. {Bvt. 2d Lt. yt/i Inf., July i, '59.) (Maj. yl Cav., May 17, '76.) Brevet Maj., July 4, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services during the Peninsular Campaign in Virginia. Brevet Lt.-Col , September 20, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Chickamauga, Ga. CARNCROSS, SEPTIMUS E. {2dLt. nth Inf., May 11, '65.) (u/ Lt. 20t& Inf., Oct. 3, '67.) Brevet Capt., October 3, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Hatcher's Run, Va. CARNEY, JOSEPH D. (\st Lt. 17th Inf., Ally 14, '61.) (Capt. ijt/i Inf., May I, '63.) Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. CAROLIN, ALEXANDER. 2d Lt. e^th Inf., Aug. 5, '61.) (Capt. i,th Inf., June 9, '64.) Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services. CARPENTER, ARTHUR B (2d Lt. Vjth Inf., Nov. 29, '62.) (Capt. \tjth Inf., Jan. 29, '66.) Brevet Capt., Septemljer i, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services during the Atlanta campaign and at the battle of Jonesboro, Ga. CARPENTER, GILBERT S. (2d Lt. i%th Inf., Juneg, '62.) (Capt. s^h Inf., Ddc. 2t, '66.) Brevet Capt., December 31, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Murfreesboro, Tenn. CARPENTER, LOUIS H. (2d Lt. 6t/i Cav., July 17, '62.) (Capt. \otA Cav., July 28, '66.) Brevet ist Lt. July 3, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Capt , September 19, 1864, for gallant and meri- torious services at the battle of Winchester, Va. Brevet Maj. and Brevet Lt- Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. Brevet Col., October 18, 1868, for gallant and meritorious services in the engagement with Indians on Beaver Creek, Kansas. TO THE PRESENT TIME. 339 CARPENTER, STEPHEN D . (Bvt. zdLt. 1st Inf., July i, '40.) (Maj. ig/^ Inf., May 14, '6l.) Brevet Lt.-Col., Apl. 7, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the bat- tle of Shiloh, Tenn. Brevet Col., Decemljer 31, 1862, for gallant and meri- torious conduct at the battle of Murfreesboro, Tenn. CARPENTER, THOMAS H. (irf Lt. \-]th Inf., May 14, '61.) (Caft. ijt/i Inf., May 4, '63.) Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the bat- tle of Gettysburg, Pa. CARR, CAMILLO C. C. (2dLt. istCav., Oct. 31, '63.) (Capt. ist Cav., Apl. 8, '69.) Brevet 1st Lt. May 6, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Todd's Tavern, Va. Brevet Capt., September 19, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Winchester, Va. CARR, EUGENE A. {Bvt. ZdLt. Mounted Hifles, July i, '50.) (Lt.-Col., ^th Cav., Jun. 7, '73.) Brevet Lt.-Col., August 10, 186 r, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Wilson's Creek, Mo. Brevet Col., May j;, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services in the action of Black River Bridge, Miss. Brevet Brig.- Genl., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the capture of Little Rock, Ark. Brevet Maj.-Genl., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meri- torious services in the field during the war.- CARROIiL, CHARLES H. {zd Lt ^tk Arty., Aug. 5, '6 1 . ) (\st Lt. ifh Arty., — . — .) Brevet 1st Lt., April 9, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the bat- tle of Sailor's Creek, Va. CARROLL, SAMUEL S. {Bvt. zdLt. gt/ilnf, July 1, '56.) {Lt.-Col. z\st Inf., Jan. 22, '67.) Brevet Maj., May 3, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Chancellorsville, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., July 3, i333, for gallant and meri- torious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Col., May 5, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of the Wilderness, Va. Breevt Brig.-Genl., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Spottsylvania, Va. Brevet Maj.-Genl., March 13, 1855, for gallant and meritorious services in the field during the war. CARTER, EUGENE. {Bvt. ZdLt. %th Inf., June 24, '61.) {Capt. 2^t/i Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet Capt., July 4, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services during the Peninsular campaign in Virginia. Brevet Maj., December 13, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Fredericksburg, Va. CARTER MASON. (zd Lt. tfh Inf., May 12, '62.) {ist Lt. cfh Inf., May 14, '64.) Brevet Capt., October 18, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in an . affair vfith Indians en route from Fort Hays to Fort Harker, Kansas. 34° BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 CASEY, JAMES S. (2dLt. tjth Inf., Atig. s, '6i.) (Capt. .) (Capt.\-]th Inf., July 1%,'fA.) Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant arid meritorious services in the siege of Port Hudson, La. CLARKE, FRANCIS. {id Lt. lyk Inf., May 14, '6i.J (Capt. lid Inf. Oct. 10, '65.) Brevet Capt., July 4, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services during the siege of Vicksburg, Miss.- Brevet Maj., November 25, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Mission Ridge, Tenn. CLARKE, FRANCIS N. {id Lt. /^h Arty., July i, '40.) {Maj. tfh Arty., Aug. 5, '62.) Brevet Lt-Col. and Brevet Col., February i, 1865. (Services not specified.) CLARKE, GEORGE J. {ist Lt. Sig. Corps, Mar. 3, '63.) (1st Lt. Sig. Corps Mar. 3, '(>y) Brevet Capt, December 5, 1864, for faithful and meritorious services. CLARKE, HENRY F. {Bvt. id Lt. id Arty., July \,''^y)(Asst.Cam..-Genl.Subs. (Lf.Col.),June 2% '64.) ' Brevet Capt., September 13, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Chapiiltepec. Brevet Col., September ir, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services during the campaign in Maryland. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865 for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of . Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Maj.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for faithful, and meritorious services in the Subsistence Department during the war. CLARY, ROBERT B. (Bvt. IdLt. 5^4 Inf., July i, '28.) (A. Q. M.-Cenl. (Col.), July 29, '66.) Brevet Col. and Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritori- ous services during the war- CLAY, JOHN K. {id Lt. ntk Inf., June 30, '62.) (1st Lt. l^h Inf., May 14, '64.) Brevet Capt., May 5, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of the Wilderness, Va. 16 34^ BREVETS CONFEEKED FROM l8l2 CLEGHORN, JOHN F. ( 1st Lt. 4^tA Inf., July 28, '66. ) ( i J' Lt. ^tfh Inf^ July 28, '66.) Brevet C.apt, March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the cap- ture of Vicksburg, Miss. CTLEMENS, WTLLIAM "W. (2dLt. \-]th Inf., Feb. 23 , '66.) [1st Lt. 35*4 Inf., Feb. 1, '67.) Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the cap- ture of Fort Fisher, N. C. Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for meritorious services in the Signal Corps during the war. CLEMIilTTS, BENNETT A. {Asst. Surg., Nm. 4, '56.) {Surg: (Maj.), Feb. 27, '63.) Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful nnd meritorious services during the war. CLIFFORD, WALTBE. (2dlJ. idth Inf., Aug. 10, '63.) {Capt. Jth Inf., July 31, '67.) Brevet ist Lt., September 19, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Chickamauga, Ga. CLINCH, DUNCAN L. (1st Lt. Jdlnf, July I, '08.) ( Col. Zth Inf., Apl. 2P, '19.) Brevet Brig.-Gen., April 20, i829> for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. CMNTON, WILEJAM. {ist Lt. loth Inf., Mar. 3, '55.) ^Maj. i^h Inf., Feb. 17, '64.) Brevet Maj., July 2, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of GettysburgjjPa. CLITZ, HENRY B. (Bvt. 2.dLt. 1th Inf., July 1, '45.) (Cel. icth Inf., Feb. 22, '69.) Brevet ist Lt., Apl. 18, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Cerro Gordo. Brevet Lt.-Col., June 27, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gaines's Mills, Va. Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for galJant and meritorious services during the war. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and distinguished services in the field. CLITZ, JOHN. [Ens. 12th Inf., Mar. 30, '14.) ( Capt. zd Inf., Apl, 4, '32.) Brevet 1st Lt., September 17, 1814, for distinguished services at Brown's sor. tie from Fort Erie. Brevet Capt., December 31, i829,for loyears' faithful ser- vice in one grade. CLOSSON, HENRY W. (2d Lt. 1st Arty., July 1, '54.) (Major $th Arty., Nov. 1, '76.) BrevetMaj., July 8, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the capture of Port Hudson, La. Brevet Lt.-Col., August 23,1864, for gallant and merito- rious services at the capture of Fort Morgan, Ala. CLOUS, JOHN W. (2d Lt. 6th Inf., Nov. 29, '62.) ( Capt. 2^h Inf., Jan. 22, '67.) Brevet ist Lt., July 2, 1863, for gallant and meritorious seri'ices at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Capt, March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. TO THE PRESENT TIME. 347 COATES, EDWIN M. (2dLt. 2d Cm)., Aug. 5, '61.) {.Caft. Afh Inf., Apt. 11, '65.) Brevet Capt, August i, 1864, for gallant services at the battle of the Wilder- ness, Va., and during the campaign before Richmond. COATS, ALBERT. [zdLt. 6th Cav., Oct. 26, '6i.) (ist. Lt. 6th Cav., Dec. 23, '62.) Brevet Capt., Brevet Maj., and Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. COBBS, WADDY V. (Ens. j/i Inf., Aug. 4, '13.) (Maj. e^h Inf., Apl. 26, '38.) Brevet Maj., March 31, 1829, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. COCHRAN, MELVILLE A. (Capt. 16th Inf., Aug. 5, '61.) (Capt. 2d Inf., Aug. 5, '61.) Brevet Maj., September 30, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Chickamauga, Ga. GOENZLER, PETER J, (2d Lt. i6th Inf., — , '63.) (2d Lt. \6ih Inf.,—, '63.) Brevet ist Lt, November 25, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Mission Ridge, Tenn. COFFEE, ANDREVr J. (Addtl. Paymaster, June 24, '46.) (Paymaster (Maj.), Feb. 23, '47.) Brevet Lt. Col., February 23, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Buena Vista. COFFIE, WILLIAM, (Ens. iffh Inf., Mar. 12, '12.) (\st Lt. \tfh Inf., Sept. 21, '14.) Retained, May, l8i6 (in reorganization under act of March 3, 1815), as 2d Lt., Artillery, with Brevet of ist Lt. from September 21, 1814. COGSWELL, MILTON. (Bvt. 2dLt. 4th Inf., July i, '49.) (Maj. Zth Inf., Oct. 8, '64.) Brevet Maj., October 21, 1861, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Ball's Bluff, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col. July 30, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services in front of Petersburg, Va. Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. COLE, ALONZO A. (2d Lt.yth Inf., Oct. 24, '61.) .(Capt. Jth Inf., May ^, '64.) Brevet Capt., July 2, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. COLEMAN, FREDERICK W. (2dLt. i^h Inf., Feb. 23, '66.) (Capt. lifh Inf., Oct. 22, '67.) Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the bat- tle of Spottsylvania, Va. Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and merit- orious services in the battle of Cold Harbor, Va 348 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 COLLIER, -WILLIAM S. (2dLt. ifh Inf., Aug. 5, '61.) {Capt. ifk Inf., June 29, '64.) Brevet Capt., May 3, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Chancellorsville, Va. Brevet Maj. April 2, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services in front of Petersburg, Va. COLLINS, FRANCIS. (Bvt.2dLt.ith Arty., July I, '^e,.) (\st. Lt. \th Arty., Sept. it,,^'].) Brevet ist Lt., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at ■ Contreras and Churubusco. COLLINS, JOSEPH B. (2d Lt. ifk Inf., Mar. 29, '48.) (Maj. 2d Inf., Jan. 20, '65.) Brevet Maj., June 27, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gaines's Mills, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., August 30, 1862, for gallant and merit- orious services at the battle of Bull Run (2d), Va. Brevet (Col., April 9, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the operations resulting in the fall of Richmond and the surrender cf General Lee. COLLINS, PATRICK. (2dLt. \ifh Inf., May 14, '61.) (Capt. 21st Inf., July 22, '65.) Brevet Capt., August 30, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Bull Run (2d), Va. Brevet Maj., September 17, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Antietara, Md. COMBA, RICHARD. (2d It. yfklnf, Feb. 19, '63.) (Capt. -jth Inf., Mar. 14, '65.) Brevet ist Lt., July 2, 1863, for gallant an-d meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Capt. and Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for gal- lant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Va. ' COMLY, CLIFTON. (2d Lt, 1st. Cav., June 17, '62.) (Capt. Ordn., Dec. 15, '67. Brevet Capt., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services in the Ordnance Department. COMPTON, CHARLES E. (Maj. ifith Inf., July 28, '66.) (Maj. 6th Cav., July 2%, '66.) Brevet Lt-Col., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the campaign against Mobile, Ala. COMSTOCK, CYRUS B. (Bvt. 2d Lt. Engrs., July i, '55.) (Maj. Engrs., Dec. 28, '65.) Brevet Maj., July 4, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services during the siege of Vicksburgh, Miss. Brevet Lt.-Col., May 6, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of the Wilderness, Va. Brevet Col., Jan- uary 15, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the capture pf Fort Fisher, N. C. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services in the campaign ending with the capture of Atlanta, Ga. CONNER, PHINEASS. (Asst. Surg., Apr. 16, '62.) [Asst. Surg., Apr. 16, '62.) Brevet Capt. and Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. TO THE PRESENT TIME. 349 CONNOLLY, THOMAS. {2d Lt. 2yth Inf., Jan. 22, '67.) (\stLt. 2jth Inf. July i, '67.) Brevet ist Lt, March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services during the siege of Port Hudson, La. Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the siege of Port Hudson, La. CONRAD, JOSEPH. (Capt. 2<)th Inf., July 28, '66.) (Capt. lUh Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet Maj., March 2, 1S67, for gallant and meritorious services in the Atlanta campaign.. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Franklin, Tenn. Brevet CoI„ March 2, 1867, for gal- lant and meritorious services in the battle of Nashville, Tenn. CONRAD, JOSEPH S. (Bvt 2d Lt ifh Inf., July I, '57.) [Capt. 2d Inf., Nmi. i, '61.) Brevet Maj., August i, 1864, for gallant services at the battle of the Wilder- ness, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., August i, 1864, for gallant services at the battle of North Anna River, Va. Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and merit- orious services in the campaign under General W. S. Hancock in 1864. CONWAY, EDVTIN J. (2dLt. 4tA Cav., Feb. 19, '63.) (Capt ifh Cav., July i, '68.) Brevet Capt, April 2, 1865,'^for gallant aijd meritorious services at the capture of Selma, Ala. CONYNGHAM, JOHN B. (Capt. r^th Inf., Mar. 7, '67.) (Capt ■^Sth Inf., Mar. 7, '67.) Brevet Maj., March 7, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the siege of Yorktown, Va. Brevet Lt. Col., March 7, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Fair Oaks, Va. CONYNGHAM, JOHN F. (2dLt li,tk Inf., Feb. 23, '66.) (T-st. Lt 2i,th Inf., Feb. 23, '66.) Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services during the vvar. COOK, HENRY C. (\st Lt. i&h Inf., Aug. 5, '61.) (Capt 2d Inf., Sept 24, '64.) Brevet Capt., September i, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services during the Atlanta campaign, and at the battle of Jonesboro, Ga. COOKE, PHILIP ST. GEORGE. (Bvt 2dLt Inf., July i, '27.) (Brig.-Gen., Nov. 12, '61.) Brevet Lt-Col., February 20, 1847, for meritorious conduct in Califorriia. Brevet Maj.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. COOKE, "WILLIAM W. (2dLt ytk Cav., July 28, '66.) (ut Lt. -jtfiCav., July 31, '67.) Brevet Capt, March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Petersburg, Va., June 17, 1864. Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Dinwiddle C. H., Va., March 29, 1865. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Sailor's Creek, Va., April 6, 1865. 3 so BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 COOI.BY, rRANCIS. {Capt. lith Inf., May. 14, '61.) [Capt nth Inf., May 14, '6i.j Brevet Maj., August i, 1864, for gallant services at Spottsylvania, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., August i, 1864, for gallant services in battle before Peters- burg, Va. COOLEY, JAMES C. (2dLt. tfh Cav. May 3, '65.) ("' Lt. tfh Cav., —', — .) Brevet ist U. and Brevet Capt, May 3, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. COOLIDGE, RICHARD H. (Asst. Surg., Aug. 16, '41.) {Surg. {Maj.), June 23, '60.) Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. COOLIDGB, SIDNEY "W. (Maj. xdth Inf., May 14, '61.) {Maj. \(>th Inf., May 14, '61.) Brevet Lt. Col., September 19, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Chickamauga, Ga. COOPER, GEORGE E. (Asst. Surg., Aug. 28, '47.) {Surg. (Maj.), May 21, '61.) Brevet Lt. Col., to date from September i, 1864, the date upon which the campaign against Atlanta, Ga., terminated. Brevet Col., March. 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. COOPER, SAMUEL. (Bvt. zdLt. Light Arty., Dec. 11, '15.) (Adjt. Gen. (Col), July 15, '52.) Brevet Capt, July 6, 1831, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. Breve* Col., May 30, 1848, for meritorious conduct in the war with Mexico. COOPER, ■WICKLITFE. (Maj. ith Cav., , 1866.) (Maj.yth Cav., , 1866.) Brevet Lt. Col., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Resaca, Ga. Brevet Col., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the capture of Montgomery, Ala. COPPEE, HENRY. (Bvt. idLt. id Arty., July i, '45.) (\st Lt. 1st Arty., Aug. ■2a, '47.) Brevet Capt., .August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. COPPINGER, JOHN J. (Capt. \ifh Inf., Sept. 30, '61.) (Capt. zyl Inf., Sept. 30, '61.) Brevet Maj., June 12, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Trevilliau Station, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., October 19, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Cedar Creek, Va. Brevet Col., December I, i868, for zeal and energy while in command of troops operating against hostile Indians, in 1866-7-8. CORBALY, JOHN R. (idLt. tfh Inf., Jan. 3, '12.) (Capt., t;h Inf., June 28, '14.) Retained, December, 1815 (in reorganization under act of March 3, 1815), as 1st Lt., 7th Infantry, with Brevet of Capt. from June 28, 1814. TO THE PRESENT TIME. 351 CORBIN, HENRY C. {2d Lt. lytk Inf., May 11, '66.) {Cap. 2^/1 Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet MaJ., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in action at Decatur, Ala. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious ser- vices in the battle of Nashville, Tenn. COSTER, JOHN H. {\st Lt. lath Inf., Mar. 7, '67.) {Capf. ?,th Ca^., Mar. 29, '73.) Brevet Capt., March 7, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the action at Glendale, Va. COT7CH, DARIUS N. (Bvt. 2d Lt. ^th Arty., July i, '46.) {\st Lt. ifh Arty., Dec. 4, '47.) Brevet ist Lt., February 23, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Buena Vista. COUES, ELLIOTT. {Asst. Stcrg,, Mar. 30, '64.) (Asst. Smg., Mar. 30, '64.) Brevet Capt., .March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. ° COULTER, "WILL. A. (2dLt. I2t& Inf., May ii, '66.) (ist Lt. 12th Inf., Feb. 22, '69.) Brevet 1st Lt. and Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Nashville, Tenn. COUNSEUMAN, JACOB H. {zd Lt. 1st Arty., June 1 1, '63.) (\st Lt. ist Arty., Aug. 16, '64.) Brevet ist Lt., August i, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Brandy Station, Va. Brevet Capt., August 14, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services in action at Deep Bottom, Va. Brevet Maj. and Brevet Lt.-C61., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. COURTNEY, MICHAEL L. {zdLt 39*4 Inf., July 2?,, '66.) {Capt. 2tfh Inf., Mar. 3, '75.) Brevet ist Lt. and Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in action at Pulaski, Ga. Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Nashville, Tenn. COWLES, EDWARD. {Asst. Surg., June 13, '63.) {Asst. Surg., June 13, '63.) Brevet Capt., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services. COX, CHARLES G. {2d Lt -jth Cav., Mar. 7, '67.) {Capt. lotA Cav., June 12, '67.) Brevet Maj., June 12, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Cold Harbor, Va. CRABB, GEORGE ^V. {2d Lt. tfh Arty., May 14, '61.) {\st Lt y:h Arty., Feb. 22, '65.) Brevet ist Lt., September 17, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Antietam, Md. Brevet Capt., April 2, 1865, for gallant and merit- orious services during the siege of Petersburg, Va.* 352 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 CROFT, DAVID L. {zd Lt. 6th Inf., Aug. 24, '67.) (i-s^ Zi._6th Inf., Ocfr.31, '76.) Brevet ist Lt., August 24, 1867, for gallantry in maintaining his position under great exposure on the Appomattox Signal Tower during the siege of Petersburg in the late war, while his station was for some time deliberately cannonaded by the enemy. Brevet Capt., August 24, 1867, for faithful and meritorious services in the Signal Corps during the war. CRAFT, EUJAH R. (2(/ ZJ. ^h Arty., May 14, '61 .) {ist Lt. xfh Arty., Sept. 22, '64.) Brevet Capt., March 13, 1865, for gallant and highly meritorious services at Port Hudson, La. Brevet Maj., March 13^1865, for gallant and highly merit- orious services at Foit Morgan, Ala. CRAFTS, WELCOME A. (2fl» Lt. TjtA Inf., Apl. 6i '66.) (Capt. zfitk Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, fot gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Fredericksburg, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 2, 1867, for gallant and merit- orious services in the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. CRAIG, HENRY K. (\sf Lt. id Arty., Mar. 17, '12.) (Col. Ordn., July \o, '51.) Brevet Maj., December 23, 1823, for 10 years faithful service in one grade- Brevet Lt.-Col., September 23, T846, for gallant and meritorious conduct in several conflicts at Monterey. Brevet Brig.-GSen., March 13,1865, for long and faithful services in the army. CRAIG, JOHN IT. (Caft. ^ti Itrf., July 28, '6&) (Capt. JOtA Inf., Jidy 28, '66.) Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and distinguished services at the bat- tle of Gettysburg, Pa., and for good conduct and meritorious services during the operations resulting in the fall of Richmond and in the surrender of the insur- gent army under General Lee. CRAIG, IJTWIS S. (zdLt. zdlhngj., Octr. 14, '37.) (Capt. yS Inf., June 18, '461.) Brevet Maj., September 27, 1846^ for gallant and meritorious conduct at Monterey. Brevet Lt.-Col., August 201, 1847, for gallant and meritorious con- duct at Coutreras and Churubusco. CRAIGHHOii, "WTUJAM P. {JBvt. 2d Lt. Engrs., July i , '53.) (Maj. Engrs., Nov. 23, '65.) Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful, ant! meritorious services during the war, and particularly for his services in the defense of Cumberland Gap and the ulterior operations of General Morgan's forces- Brevet CoL, March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services dining the war. CRAIGIE, DAVID, J. (2dLt. 12th Inf., May 1 1, '66.) (irf Lt. \2tk Inf., Octr. 17, '67.) Brevet ist Lt. March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the bat- tle of Shiloh, Tenn. Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of luka. Miss. TO THE PRESENT TIME. 353 CRAM, GEORGE C. {Capt. (nth Cav., May 14, '6l.) (Maj. i^h Cav., Octr. 12, '67.) Brevet Maj., June 9, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Beverly Ford, Va. CRAM, GEORGE H. {?.dLt. 17th Inf., Feb. 23, '66.) (Capt. 17th Inf., Octr. 8, '67.) 1 ^r'"i'c.?.*P*'' '^^'■'^^ ^' '^^7. for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Shiloh Tenn. Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services m the battle of Mission Ridge, Tenn. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 2 1867 for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Atlanta, Ga. CRAM, THOMAS J. (Bvt. zdLt. 2d Arty., July 1, '26.) (Co/. ^«^j-., W'ot,. 23, '65.) Brevet Brig.-Gen. and Brevet Maj.-Gen., January 13, 1866, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. CRANDAL, FREDERICK M. (i.f/ It. 38M Inf., July 28, '66.) (Capt. z^tA Inf., June 12, '67.) Brevet Capt and Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services m the battle of Arkansas Post, Ark. Brevet Lt.-Col , March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious-services in the capture of Fort Blakely, Ala. CRANE, CHARLES H. (Asst. Surg., Feb. 2, '48.) (Asst. Surg. Gen. {Cot.), July 28, '66.) . Brevet Lt.-Col. and Brevet Col., January i, 1865. (Services not specified ) Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for meritorious services during the war. CRANE, ICHABOD B. (2th Inf., June 14, '42.) Brevet Maj., September, 28, 1822, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. Brevet Col., July 7, 1838, for meritorious services in Florida. DAVIDSON, DELpZIER. (2dLt. 24 Inf., July 31, '38.) [Maj. ^th Inf., Nffv.. I, '61.) Brevet Capt., August 20, 1847, fo"" gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco.- DAVIDSON, JOHN W. (Bvt. id Lt. 1st Drags., July i, '45.) (Lt. Col. \oth Cav., Dec. I, '66.) Brevet Lt.-Col., June 27, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the of Gaines's Mills, Va. Brevet Col., June 28, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Golding's Farm, Va. Brevet Brig-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the capture of Little Rock, Ark. Brevet Maj., -Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services in the field during the war. DAVIBS, FRANCIS A. (■idLt. 2d Arty., May 6, '61.) (Capt idth Inf., Sept. 27, '6l.) Brevet Maj., August 30, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Bull Run (2d), Va. DAVIS, BENJAMIN P. (Bvt. 2d It. tfh Inf., July i, '54.) (Capt. 1st Cav., July. 30, '6l.) Brevet Maj., September 15, 1862, for meritorious services in the withdrawal of the cavalry force from Harper's Ferry at the surrender of that place. DAVIS, CHARLES L. (2dZt. loth Inf., Feb. 23, '66.) (1st Lt. loth Inf., Feb. 23, '66.) Brevet Capt, March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the cam- paign from the Rapidan to the James. Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the siege of Petersburg, Va. DAVIS, EDV7ARD. (2d Lt. ^d Arty., June 17, '67.) (ist Lt. yl Arty., Apl. 14, '73.) Brevet ist Lt., June 17, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the tat- tle of Chickamauga, Ga. DAVIS, HENRY T. (Capt. 10th Cav., July 28, '66.)' {Capt. 10th Cav., July 28, '66.) Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the bat- tle of Chancellorsville, Va. DAVIS, JEFFERSON C. (2d Lt. 1st Arty., June 17, '48.) ( Col. 2->,d Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet Maj., March g, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Pea Ridge, Ark. Brevet Lt.-Col., May 15, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Resaca, Ga. Brevet Col., May 20, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the capture of Rome, Ga. Brevet Brig. -Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Kenesaw Mountain, Ga. Brevet Maj.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritori- ous services at the battle of Jonesboro, Ga. TO THE PRESENT TIME 36 1 DAVIS, JOHN M. {£ns. 2d Inf., Feb.. 27, '07.) (Asst. Insfector-Gen. (Maj.), Oct. i, '14.) Brevet IVJaj., December 23, 1814, for gallant conduct at the siege of New Orleans. DAVIS, IVIURRAY. (2d it. 1st Cav., Mar. IT, '66.) (Capt. Sth Cav:, July 2?,,'6(,.) Brevet Maj., March 2 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Guntdwii, Miss. DAVIS, NELSON H. (Bvt. 2d Lt. 2,d Inf., July i, '46.) [Inspector-Gen. [Col.), Mar. 23, '64.) Brevet ist Lt., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conductat Contre- ras and Churubusco. Brevet X.t.-Col., July 3, 1863, for gallant and meritorioiis services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Col. May 29, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services in action with Apache Indians; Arizona. Brevet Brig.- •Gen. March 13, 1865, for meritorious and efficient services during the war. DAVIS, PHILIP C. (Asst. Surg., May 28, '61.) (Surg., Oct. 17, '68.) Brevet Capt. and Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. DAVIS, ROBERT. (2dLt. 2d Inf., July 18, '62.) (\st Lt. 2d Inf., Oct. 20, '63.) Brevet Capt., August i, 1864, for gallant services at Spottsylvania and du- ring the campaign before Richmond. ' DAVIS, SAMXTELB. (2dLt, 14IA Inf., Apl. 9, '47.) (ist Lt. i4tA Inf., Dec. —, '47.) Brevet ist Lt., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. DAVIS, VriRT. (2dZf. ifh Cav. Apt. 22, '63.) (Capt. Afh Cav., June 19, '68.) Brevet ist Lt, September 19, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Chickamauga, Ga. Brevet Capt, February 20, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services during the cavalry expedition in Mississippi. Brevet Maj., April 2, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the capture of Selma, Ala. DAVISON, JAMBS. (Bvt. 2dLt. ylArty., Oct. 22, '62.) (2d Lt. tfh Arty., Oct. 22, '62.) Brevet ist Lt., December 13, 1862; for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Fredericksburg, Va. Brevet Capt, July 2, 1863, for gallant and meri- torious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. DA"WSON, SAMUEL K. (2d Li. \stArty., Julyi, '39.) (Col. igih Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet Capt., April 18, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Cerro Gordo. Brevet Col., September 20, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle or Chickamauga, Ga. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for f aithf ul^and meritorious services during the war. ^ 362 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM 1 8 12 DAY, HANNIBAI.. {idLt. 2d Inf., July i, '23.) (Cot. 6th Inf., June 7, '62.) Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for long and faithful services in the army. DAY, SELDEN A. (zdLt S^A Arty., Apl. 7, '64.) (\st Lt. $t& Arty., July 28, '66.) Brevet 1st Lt., June 3, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Cold Harbor, Va. Brevet Capt, March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritori- ous services during the war. DAYTON, LEWIS M. {2d_Lt. id Inf., July 24, '66.) {Capt. ph Cau., Mar. 6, '67.) Brevet ist Lt., Brevet Capt. and Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the Atlanta Campaign. . Brevet Lt.-Col., March 2, 1867,, for gallant and meritorious services in the campaign throughthe Carolinas. DEAN, -WILLIAM. {2dZf. 1st Cav., July 17, '62.) (Capt. \st Cav., Feb. 6, '65.) Brevet Capt., June 11, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the bat- ■ tie of Trevillian Station, Va. Brevet Maj., April i, 1865, for gallant and meri- torious services at the battle of Five Forks, Va. DEANE, W^ILLIAM W. (2dLt. 12th Inf., July 28, '66.) (2d XJ. I2tk Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet ist Lt., March ^, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the siege of Port Hudson, La. Brevet Capt, March 2, 1867, for faithful and meri- torious services during the war. DEARBORN, GBEENLEAF. (2d Lt. yl Arty., Mar. 12, '12.) (Lt.-Col. ytk Inf., Nov. 26, '45.) Brevet Maj., September 30, 1829, for ten years' faithful service in one grade. DEAS, GEORGE. (2d Lt. ith Inf., Aug. i, '38.) (A. A. G. (Bvt. Maj.), Dec. 13, '55.) Brevet Maj., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Cliurubusco. DE GRAW, CHARLES S. (Asst. Surg., July 11, '62.) (Asst.Surg., July II, '62.) Brevet Capt., and Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. DE GRESS,. JACOB C. (1st Lt. ijth Cav., July 2S, '66.) (Capt. gtA Cav., July 31, '67.) Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services during the siege of Vicksburg, Miss. Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and merito- rious services in the Siege of Vicksburg, Miss. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 2, 1867, for gallant and|meritorious services at the battle of Bayou de Glaize. DE HART, WILLIAM C. (3d It. Ordn., July I, '20.) (Capt. 2d Arty., Apl. 3, '38.) Brevet ist Lt., July l, 1830, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. '~ TO THE PRESENT TIME. 363 DE EA7, DRAKE. {istLt. I4ti Inf., May 14, '61.) (Capt. \^h Inf., May 14, '64.) Brevet Maj., August i, 1864, for gallant services at the battle of the Wilder- ness, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., August i, 1864, for gallant services at the battle of Spottsylvania, Va. DKLAFIELD, RICHARD. {id Lt. Engrs., July 24, '18.) \chf. ofEngrs. (Brig.-Gen.), Apl. 22, '64. Brevet Maj.-Genl., March 13, 1865, for faithful, meritorious and distinguished services in the Engineer Department during the war. DELANY, HAYDEN. {id Lt. <^k Inf., May 11, '67.) {idLt. <)tk Inf., May 11, '67.) Brevet ist Lt., May i, 1868, for gallant and meritorious services in action with the P.ih Ute Indians in Warner Valley, Oregon, May i, 186S. DENNY, JEREMIAH C. (zdLt. tfk Coll., July 17, '62.) (Caft. cfh Cav., July 28, '66.) Brevet Capt., October ig, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Cedar Creek, Va. DENNISON, CHARLES E. {Capt. T.%th Inf., May 14, '61.) {Capt. l8tA Inf., May 14, '61.) Brevet Maj., December 31, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Murfreesboro, Tenn. DENNISON, 'WILLIAM N. {zd Lt. zd Arty., Aug. 5, '61.) {Capt. 2d Arty., Jan. 3, '67.) Brevet Capt., July 6, 1864, for gallant and good conduct in the battle of An- tietam and tie Maryland campaign of^ September, 1862. Brevet Maj., Julv 6, 1864, for gallant and good conduct in the battles of Gaines's Mills and Mal- vern Hill, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for good conduct and gallant services during the war. DENT, FREDERICK T. {Bvt. 2dLt dth Inf., July i, '43.) {Lt.-Col. tfh Art., Dec. 31, '67.) Brevet Ist Lt. August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. Brevet Capt., September 8, 1847, for gallant and meri- torious conduct at Molino del Rey. Brevet Lt.-Col., Mav 7, 1864, for gallant and meritorious conduct at the battle of the Wilderness, Va. Brevet Col., July 30, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services in action in front of Petersburg, Va. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services in the field during the war. DENTON, THOMAS "W. {Ens. \Tfh Inf., June i, '12.) {^st. Lt s.Tfh Inf., June 30, '14.) Retained, May, 1816 (in reorganization under act of March 3, 1815), as 2d Lt. Artillery, with Brevet of ist Lt. from June 30, 1814. DERBY, GEORGE H. {Bvt. 2dLt. Ordn., July r, '46.) {Capt Top. Engr., July i, '60.) Brevet ist Lt., April 18, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Cerro Gordo. 364 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 DE RUSSY, GUSTAVUS A. (zdLt.ifh Arty., Mar. %,'i,T.) ■ ^ t,Maj.j,d Arty., July zdy'dd.) Brevet ist Lt., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. Brevet Qapt.,, September 13, 1847, for gallant conduct at Chapultepec. Brevet Maj., June 25, 1862, for gallant and meritorious ser- vices in action near Fair Oaks, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col. July i, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at Malvern Hill, Va. Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services in the field during the war. DE RUSSir, ISAAC D. (zdLt. 1st Inf., Apl. 26, '61.) {Caft. 1st Inf., Feb. 27, '62.) Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. DE HUSSY, RENE E. (2dLt. Engrs., June 10, '12.) (Cff/. Engrs., Mar. 3, '63.) Brevet Capt., September 11, 1814, for gallant conduct at the battle of Platts- burg. Brevet Maj., September 11, 1824, for 10 years faithful service in one grade. Brevet Lt.-Col., June 30, 1834, for faitliful service and meritorious conduct. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for long and faithful services to his country. DESHA, ROBERT. (Ca//. \/^th Inf., July 6, '12.) (Brig.-Maj., October—. 1814.) Brevet Maj., August 4, 1814, for gallant conduct in the attack on Fort Michilimacinac. DE TROBRIAND, PHILIP R. (Col. ■iist Inf., July 28, '66.) (Col. l-^h Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet Brig.-Gen., Marchj 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services dur- ing the war. DEVIN, JOHN D. (2th Inf., May 11, '66.) Brevet ist Lt. and Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for distinguished gallantry and good services during the war. GALLOWAY, WILLIAM. IfidLt. lefhlnf., Mar. 24, '62.) (Capt. \t,tk Inf., Apl. 23, '67.) Brevet Capt., September 20, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Chickamauga, Ga. GALLXTFE, GEORGE S. (Capt. i,yllnf., July 28, '66.) (Capt. ist Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the bat- tle of Gaines's Mills, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meri- torious services in .the battle of Charles City Cross Roads, Va. GALT, PATRICK H. (■^d Lt. Arty., Sept. 16, '14.) (Maj. 2.d Arty., Feb. 16, '47.) Brevet Capt., September 26, 1828, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. Brevet Lt.-Col., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Contre- ras and Churubusco. GANSEVOORT, HENRY L. (2d Lt. ^th Arty., May. 14, '61.) (Capt. tfh Arty., Aug. 13, '66.) Brevet Capt., September 17, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Antietam, Md. Brevet Maj., October 14, 1864, for gallant and merito- rious services in action near Manassas Gap, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. GARDINER, GEORGE W. (yl Lt. Arty., Mar. 11, '14.) (Capt. 2d Arty., Nov. 3, '32.) Brevet Capt., April 20, 1828, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. GARDINER, JOHN W. T. (Bvt. 2dLt. 1st Drags., July i, '40.) (Maj. 2d Cav., Oct. 26, '61.) Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for meritorious services during the war. GARDNER, CHARLES K. (Ens. 6th Inf., May 3, '08.) (Adjt.-Gen., (Col.), Apr. 12, '14.) Brevet Lt.-Col., February j, 1815, for distinguished and meritorious ser- vices. GARDNER, FRANKLIN. (Bvt 2dLt.']th Inf., July I, '43.) (Capt. \oth Inf., Mar. 3, '55.) Brevet ist Lt., September 23, 1846, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Monterey. Brevet Capt., April 18, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Cerro Gordo. 388 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 GARDNER, HUZEKIAH. (Caft. 44tA Inf., July 28, '66.) (Capt. 44/A Inf., July 28, '65.) Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Missionary Ridge, Tenn. GARDNER, JOHN L. (id Lt. ifh Inf., May 20, '13.) (Col. 2d Arty., July —, '61.) Brevet Maj., November i, 1833, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. Brevet Lt.-Col., April 18, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Cerro Gordo. Brevet Col., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Contreras. Brevet. Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for long and faithful services in the army. GARDNER, WILLIAM H. (Asst. Surg., Nov. 22, '62.) (Asst. Surg., Nov. 22, '62.) Brevet Capt. and Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. GARDNER, W^ILLIAM M. (Bvt. 2dLt. 1st Inf., July i, '46.) (Capt. 2d Inf., Mar. 3, '55.) Brevet ist Lt., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. GARLAND, JOHN. (\st Lt. nth Inf., Mar. 31, '13.) (Col. 8t& Inf., May 7, '49.) Brevet Maj., May 7, 1827, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. Brevet Col., May 9, 1846, for gallant conduct at Palo Alto and Resaca de la Palma. Brevet Brig.-Gen., August 20, 1847, .for gallant and meritorious conduct at Contreras and Churubusco. GARNETT, ROBERT S. (Bvt. 2d Lt. 4tA Arty., July 1, '41.) (Maj. <)th Inf., Mar. 27, '55.) Brevet Capt., September 23, 1846, for gallant conduct at Monterey. Brevet Maj., February 23, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Buena Vista. GARRARD, EIENNER. (Bvt. 2dLt. ifh Arty., j^uly I, '51.) (Maj. 3d Cav., Nov 2, '63.) Brevet Lt.-Col., July 2, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the bat- tle of Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Col., July 22, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services in the expedition to Covington, Ga. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Nashville, Tenn. Brevet Maj.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services in the field during the war. GARRETTY, FRANK D. (2dLt. i,-},dlnf., July 28, '66.) (\st Lt. lyth. Inf., Jan. 11, '68.) Brevet ist|Lt. March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services during the' war. GARVIN, ED"WIN L. (2dLt. 1st Arty., Feb. 19, '62.) (ist Lt. 1st Arty., July 4, '63.) Brevet Capt., March 13, 1865, for good conduct and gallant services during the war. TO THE PRESENT TIME. 389 GASKILL, CHARLES B. (Capt. i,oth Inf., July 28, '66.) (,Capt. ipth Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gaines's Mills, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meri- torious services at the battle of Fredericksburg, Va., December 13, 1862. GATES, COLLINSON R. [Bvt. 2dLt. ^h Inf., July i, '36.) (Capt. ?>th Inf., June 18, '46.) Brevet Capt., May 9, 1846, for gallant conduct at Palo Alto and Resaca de la Palma. Brevet Maj., September 8, 1847, for gallant conduct at Molino del Rey. GATES, WILLIAM. ( 2d Lt. Arty., Mar. 6, '06. ) ( Col. yl Arty., Oct. 13, '45.) Brevet Maj., March 3, 1823, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for long and faithful services in the army. GATLIN, RICHARD C. {Bvt. zdLt nth Inf., July i, '32.) {Maj. tfh Inf., Feb. 26, '61.) Brevet Maj., September 23, 1846, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Monterey. GAV, EBENEZER. {Bvt. 2dLt. ist Drags., July i, '55.) (.Maj. I7ih Inf., Sept. 16, '67.) Brevet Maj., October 8, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Perryville, Ky. Brevet Lt.-Col., September i, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services during the Atlanta campaign. GEDDES, ANDREW. (jstZt. ipth Inf., June 12, '67.) (irf Lt. ztfh Inf., June 12, '67.) Brevet Capt., June 12, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the siege of Vicksburg, Miss. Brevet Maj., June 12, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the capture of Spanish Fort, Ala. GBLRAY, JOSEPH W. {Capt. A,tfhlnf., July 28, '66.) {Capt. i,lth Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Cedar Mountain, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meri- torious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. GBNSEL, IRA F. {idLt. ifh Inf., Aug. 5, '61.) {\st Lt. ^h Inf., —. — , — .) Brevet Capt., December 13, 1862, for gallant and meritorieus services at the batrie of Fredericksburg, Va. GENTRY, WILLIAM T. (Bvt. 2dLt. 4th Inf., July I, '56.) {Capt igth Inf., Oct. 24, '61.) Brevet Maj., July 6, 1864, for gallant services at the crossing of the North Anna, and during the campaign before Richmond, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., April I, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Five Forks, Va. GETTY, GEORGE W. {2d Lt i^h Arty., Jily i, '40.) {Col. -^ Arty., July 28, '66.) Brevet Capt., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. Brevet Lt.-Col., April ig, 1863, for gallant and meri- 390 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM 1 8 12 torious services during the siege of Suffolk, Va. Brevet Col., March 5, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of the Wilderness, Va. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the capture of Petersburg, Va. Brevet Maj.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meri- torious services in the field during the war. GETTY, THOMAS M. {Asst. Surg-., Nov. 23, '49.) '^Surg. (Maj.), Apl. 16, '62.) Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. GHISBLnr, JAMES T. (Asst. Surg., June I, '55.) {Surg. {Maj'.), June 14, '62.) Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. Brevet Col., April 9, 1865, for meritorious services during the cam- paign from Winchester to Appomattox C. H., Va. GIBBOK, JOHN. (Bvt. 2dLt. 2d Arty., July i, '47.) {Col. Jth/nf., July 28, '66.) Brevet Maj., September 17, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Antietam, Md. Brevet Lt.-Col., December 13, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Fredericksburg, Va. Brevet Col., July 4, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Spottsylvania, Va. Brevet Maj.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the capture of Petersburg, Va. GIBBS, ALFRED. (Bvt 2d Lt Mtd. Rifles, July i, '46.) (Maj. ^th Cav., July 28, '66.) Brevet ist Lt, April 18, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Cerro- Gordo. Brevet Capt, September 13, 1847, for gallant conduct at Garita de Belen, City of Mexico. Brevet Maj., June 11, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Trevillian Station, Va. Brevet Lt -Col., September 19, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Winchester, Va. Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Five Forks, Va. Brevet Brig.-Gen., and Brevet Maj.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services in the field during the war. GIBBS, THEODORE K. (zd Lt. \st Arty., Oct. 24, '61.) [ist Lt. 1st Arty., Feb. 20, '62.) Brevet Capt, February 20, 1864, for gallarit and meritorious services at the battle of Olustee, Fla. Brevet Maj., June 3, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Cold Harbor, Va. GIBBS, VriLLIAM. (1st Lt. 44tA Inf., Mar. 11, '14.) (Regtl. Paymaster, July IJ, '16.) Brevet Capt., December 23, 1814, for gallant conduct at the siege of New Orleans. GIBSON, GEORGE. (Capt. tfk Inf., May 3, '08.) (Qr.-M.-Genl. (Col.), Apl. 29, '16.)* Brevet Brig.-Gen., April 29, 1826, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. Brevet Maj.-Gen., May 30, 1848, for meritorious conduct, particularly in per- forming his duties in prosecuting the war with Mexico. * Was made'Com.-Genl. of Subsce. with rank of Col. April 18, 1818. TO THE PRESENT TIME. 39I GIBSON, GEORGE. [M. S. K., Q. M. Deft., April 9, '53.) {Maj. t,th Inf., Jan. 22, '68.) Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for gallant conduct at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Lt.-Col., April 9, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services dur- ing the operations resulting in the fall of Richmond, Va., and the surrender of the insurgent army under General Lee. GIBSON, HORATIO G. {Bvt. 2dLt. 2d Arty., Jalyi, '47.) (Maj. yl Arty., Feb. 5, '67.) Brevet Maj., May 5, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Williamsburg, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., September 17, 1862, for gallant and meri- torious services at the battle of Antietam, Md. Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for galldnt and meritorious services in the field during the war. GIBSON, JOHN B. (2dLt. lit Arty., Mar. 8, '47.) {ist Zt. 1st Arty., yim. 12, '48.) Brevet ist Lt., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. GIBSON, JOSEPH R. (Asst. Surg., April 16, '62.) (Asst. Surg., April 16, '62.) Brevet Capt. and Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. Brevet Lt.-Col., September 28, 1866, for meritorious and distinguished services at Hart's Island, New York Harbor, where cholera prevailed. GIDDINAS, GROTIUS R. (Maj. 14th Inf., May I4,'6i.) (Lt.-Col. \(>ih Inf., May 18, '64.) Brevet Lt.-Col., July 2, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the bat- tle of Chancellorsville, Va., and Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. GILBERT, CHARLES C. (Bvt. 2dLt. ■},<> Inf., July i, '46.) (Lt.-Col. yth Inf., July 8,'68.) Brevet Maj., April 7, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Shiloh, Tenn. Brevet Lt.-Col., September i, 1862, for gallant and merito- rious services at the battle of Richmond, Va. Brevet Col., October 8, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Perryville, Ky. GILE, GEORGE "W. (ist Lt. 4St/i Inf., July 28, '66.) (Capt. 4zfh Inf., Feb. 4, '68.) Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the bat- tle of Bull Run (2d), Va. Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and merit- rious services in the battle of South Mountain, Md. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Antietam, Md. GILES, VriLLIAM B. (1st Lt. I2tk Inf., April %' 4"].) (1st Lt. 12th Inf., April % 47.) Brevet Capt., August 20, 1847, f°r gallant and meritorious conduct at Cen- tre ras and Churubusco. GILL, JOHN U. (2d Lt. -Ath Inf., Oct. 31, '63.) ( \st Lt. 2,(>th Inf., July 28, '64.) Brevet Capt., September i, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services during the Atlanta campaign, and at the battle of Jonesboro, Ga. 392 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 GILIiEM, ALVAN C. {Bvt. zd Lt. 1st Arty., July i, '51.) (Col. 1st Cav., July 28, '65.) Brevet Maj., Januirv 19, 1862, for gallant and msritorious services at the battle of Mill Spring, Ky. Brevet Lt.-Co1., December 16, 1864, for gallant and maritoriOus services in action at Marion, Va. Brevet Cnl., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. Brevet Brig. -Gen., March. 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services in the field during the war. Brevet Mij.-Gen., April 12, 1865, for gallant conduct at the battle of Salisbury, N. C. GILLSSPIS, GEORGE L. {■id Lt. Engrs., yum 17, '62.) {Maj. Eiigrs., Sept. 5, '71.) Brevet Maj., August i, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services during the campaign before Richmond, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., April 9, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services in the campaign from Winchester to Appomattox C. H., Va. GILLBTrB, JAMBS. {Capt. i^th Inf., Mar. 7, '67.) {Capt. \tfh Inf., Mar. 7. '67.) Brevet Maj., March 7, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Chancellorsville, Va. GILLISS, JAMES. [2d Lt. tfh Arty., May 14, '61.) [A. Q. M. [Capt.], Aug. lo, '64.) Brevet ist Lt., July 1, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Malvern Hill, Va. Brevet Capt., May 12, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Spottsylvania C. H., Va. GILLMORB, QUINCY A. {Bvt. zd Lt. Engrs., July i, '49.) (Lt.-Col. Engrs., Jan. 13, '74.) Brevet Lt.-Col., April 11, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services in the capture of Fort Pulaski, Ga. Brevet Col., March 30, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Somerset, Ky. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services in the capture of Fort Wagner, S. C. Brevet Maj.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services in the assault on Morris Island, S. C. GILMAN, JEREMIAH H. (Bvt. zd Lt. 1st Arty, July, l, '56.) {Com. of Subs. (Capt), Feb. 9, '63.) Brevet Maj., April 7, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Shiloh, Tenn. Brevet Lt.-Col., December 31, 1862, for gallant and merito- rious services at the battle of Murfreesboro, Tenn. GILMORB, JOHN C. {zd IJ. \zth Inf., May 11, '65.) (Capt. zdfh Inf., Jan. 22, '67.) Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Antietam, Md. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Fredericksburg, Va. GITTINGS, ERSKINE. {zd Lt. 3d Arty, May 6, '61.) (Capt. yl Arty., Feb. 5, '67.) Brevet Capt., October 22, 186:, for gallant and meritorious services in action at Pocotaligo River, S. C. Brevet Maj., November 29, 1863, for gajlant and meritorious services at the siege of Knoxville, Tenn. TO THE PRESENT TIME. 393 GIVENS, NEWTON C. (Bvt.2dLl. -istDrags^ July i, '46.) (Capt. 2d Drags., Feb. 28, '57.) Brevet 1st Lt, February 23, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Buena Vista. GLACKIN, JOHN. (2ar Lt. <)th Inf., Apl. 9, '47.) (^st Lt. ^h Inf., Dec. — , '47.) Brevet ist Lt., September 13, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Chapultepec GLASSEUi, JAMES M. {.Ens. 2Qth Inf., May i, '12.) [Maj. (>th Inf., Sept. 6, '37.) Brevet Maj, February io, 1828, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. GLEASON, JOSEPH. (Ens. <^k Inf., Jan. 22, '13.) {Asst. Com. Subs., Mar. — , '19.) Brevet Capt, August 15, 1814, for gallant conduct in defense of Fort Erie. GLENN, THOMAS. (Capt. ll^h luf, Apl. 9, '47.) (Capt. ij^tk Inf., Apl. 9, '47-) Brevet Maj., September 13, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Chapultepec. GODSARD, CHARLES E. (Asst. Surg., May 28, '61.) (Surg. (Maj.), Jan. 6, '68.) Brevet Capt. and Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. GOOD ALT!, GREEWLEAF A. (istLt. zylluf, July 28, '66.) (\st Lt. 2^ Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet Capt, March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the bat- tle of Gettysburg, Pa. GOODHUE, JOHN M. (Capt. wtk Inf., May 14, '61.) (Maj. wth Inf., Nov. 23, '68.) Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the bat- tle of Gettysburg, Pa. GOODING, GEORGE. (Em. ^h Inf., Dec. 12, '08.) (Capt. 4th Inf., June 15, '14.) Retained, January, 1816 (in reorganization under act of March 3, 1815), as 1st Lt. 5th Infantry with Brevet of Capt. from June 15, 1814. GOODRICH, FRANK. (2d Lt. 2d Inf., Aug. 5, '61.) (1st Lt. 2d Inf., Nov. 19, '61.) Brevet Capt., May 3, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Chancellorsville, Va. GOODWIN, WILLIAM P. (\st Lt \(tth Inf., May 14, '61.) (Capt. \6th Inf., May 14, '64.) Brevet Capt., September 20, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Chickaraauga, Ga. GORDON, DAVID S. (2d Lt. 2d Can., Apl. 26, '61.) (Capt. 2d Caro., Apl. 25, '63.) Brevet Maj., July 3, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services in the Gettys- burg campaign. 18 394 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 G-ORDOIT, GEORGE A. (Bvt. 2d Lt. yl Arty., July i, '54.) '\Maj. {^Maj. Zth Inf., Jul'» 31, '61.) Brevet Maj., August 20, 1847, for gallant conduct at Churubusco. GORE, JOHN H. {2dLt. 4M Inf., Aug. I, '38.) (Capt. 4tk Inf., Dee. 26, '47.) Brevet Capt., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. Brevet Maj., September 8, 1847, for gallant conduct at Molino del Rey. GOUVERNEUR, SAMUEL L. (zd Lt. sfh Arty., Mar. 8, '47.) (2d Lt. i,th Arty., Mar. 8, '47.) Brevet ist Lt., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. GEA?TON, BENJAMIN F. (2d Lt. 2o,th Inf., May 6, '67.) (2d Lt. 2gtk Inf., May 6, '67.) Brevet ist Lt., May 6, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Atlanta, Ga. Brevet Capt., May 6, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services m the battle of Jonesboro, Ga. GRAFTON, HENRY D. (2d Lt: 1st Arty, July i, '39.) i^Caft. jd Arty., Sept. 4, '51.) Brevet Capt., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. GRAHAM, CAMPBELL. {2dLt. 2d Arty., July i, '22.) (Maj. Top. Engrs., Dec. 9, '57.) Brevet Capt., December 31, 1835, for gallant and good conduct in the affair of the Withlacoochee, Fla. GRAHAM, GEORGE -W. (is; Lt lotk Cav., July 28, '66.) (Capt. lotk Cav., May 29, '67.) Brevet Maj., September 17, 1868, for gallant and meritorious services at the affair with Indians on the Big Sandy, C. T., September 17, 1868. GRAHAM, JAMES D. ylLt. Arty., July ^T,' IT.) (Col. Engrs. Jiine i,'6z-) Brevet Lt.-Col., January i, 1847, for valuable and highly distinguished ser- TO THE PRESENT TIME. 395 vices, particularly on the boundary line between the United States and British Provinces, &c. GRAHAM, LA'WHENCE P. (■idLt. 2d Drags., Oct. 13, '37.) . (Co/, ifh Cav., May 9, '64.) Brevet Maj., May, 9, 1846, for gallant conduct at Palo Alto and Resaca de la Palma. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. GRAHAM, LORIMERi {idLt. loth Inf., Apl. 9, '47.) (zd Lt. loti Inf., Apl. 9, '47.) Brevet, ist Lt., August 13, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct in the affair at Mira Flores. Brevet Capt., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritori- ous conduct at Churubusco. GRAHAM, •WILLIAM M. {ylLt. Arty., July \-],'\T.) {Lt. Col. nth Inf., Mar. 2,' AT.) Brevet Capt., August 11, 1829, for 10 years' fai'hful service in one grade. Brevet Maj., December 31, 1835, for gallant and good conduct in the affair of the Withlacoochee, Fla. GRAHAM, WILLIAM M. (2d Lt. 1st Arty., Jicne 7, '55.) (Capt. 1st Arty., Oct. 26, '6l.) Brevet Maj., July i, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services in the Penin- sular campaign in Virginia. Brevet Lt.-Col., September 17, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Antietam, Md. Brevet Col., July 3, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Brig.-Genl., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services in the field during the war. GRANGER, GORDON. (Bvt. 2d. Lt. 2d Inf., July 1, '45.) (Col. 2t,th Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet ist Lt., August 20, 1847, fo'' gallant and meritorious conduct at Contre- ras and Churubusco. Brevet Capt., September 13, 1847, for gallant and meri- torious conduct at Chapultepec. Brevet Maj. .August 10, 1861, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Wilson's Creek, Mo. Brevet Lt.-Col., Sep- tember 20, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Chickamau- ga, Ga. Brevet Col, November 24, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Chattanooga, Tenn. Brevet Brig.-Genl., March 13, 1865, for gal- lant and meritorious services at the capture of Mobile, Ala. Brevet Maj.- Gen., March 13, 1865, for distinguished gallantry and good conduct at the capture of Forts Gaines and Morgan, Ala. GRANGER, LOUIS E. (2d Lt. iflth Inf., Mar. 7, '67.) (2d Lt. 40th Inf., Mar. 7, '67.) Brevet 1st Lt., March 7, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the bat- tle of Antietam, Md. Brevet Capt., March 7, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the siege of Port Hudson, La. GRANGER, ROBERT S. (2d Lt. 1st Inf., July I, '38.) (Col. 21st Inf., Aug. 16, '71.) Brevet Col., October 9, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the bat- tle of Lawrenceburg, Ky. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services in defense of Decatur, Ala. Brevet Maj.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. 396 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 GRANT, ULYSSES S. {Bv(. 2d Lt. 4th Inf., July I, '43.) (General of the Army, July 25, '66.) Brevet ist Lt., September 8, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Molino del Key. Brevet Capt., September 13, 1847, for gallant cdnduct at Chapul tepee. GRATIOT, CHARLES. {2d Lt. Engrs., Oct. 30, '06.) ( Chf. Engrs. (Col.), May 24, '28.) Brevet Brig.-Gen., May 24, 1828, for meritorious services and general good conduct. GRAVES, CHARLES H. (\st Lt. i^k Inf., Nov. 29, '65.) ( Capt. ^^th Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the bat- tle of Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritori- ous services in the assault on Fort Fisher, N. C. GRAVES, WILLIAM P. (2d Lt. 2d Arty., Mar. 24, '62.) (Capt. 2d Arty., Mar. 25, '73.) Brevet ist Lt, July I, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Malvern Hill, Va. Brevet Capt., August 29, 1862, for gallant and meritori- ous services at the battle of Manassas, Va. Brevet Maj., November 29, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services during the defense of Fort Sanders, Tenn. GRAY, CHARLES C. (Asst. Surg., May 28, '61.) [Stirg. (Maj.), July 28, '66.) Brevet Capt., Brevet Maj. and Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. GRAY, ROBERT. (\st Lt. Cav., Jan. 8, '99.) (Maj. i6tk Inf., Aug. 15, '13.) Retained, January i, 1816 (in reorganization under act of March 3, 1815), as Capt. 2d Infantry, with Brevet of Maj. from August 15, 1813. GRAY, ROMAN H. (2d Lt. itfhlnf, Apl. 7, '62.) (Capt. 2^h Inf., Sept. 30, '66.) Brevet Capt., September 20, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Chickamauga, Ga. GRAYSON, JOHN B. (Bvt. 2dLt. zdArty., July i, '26.) (Com. Subs. (Maj.), Oct. 21, '52.) Brevet Maj., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. Brevet Lt.-Col., September 13, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Chapultepec. GREBLE, JOHN T. (Bvt 2d Lt. 2d Arty., July I, '54.) (\st Lt. 2d Arty., Mar. 3, '57.) Brevet Capt., Brevet Maj. and Brevet Lt.-Col., June 10, i86i,for conspicuous gallantry and meritorious conduct in the battle of Big Bethel, Va. GREEN, GEORGE W. (1st Lt. I'jtk Inf., May 14, '61.) (Capt. lytk Inf., Oct. 11, '64.) Brevet Capt., May 3, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle TO THE PRESENT TIME. 397 of Chancellorsville, Va. Brevet Maj., July 2, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services d!liring the war. GREEN, JOHN. (2(/ Lt. 2d Drags., June 18, '55. ) (Maj. ist Cav., June 9, '68.) Brevet Maj, July 3, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services in the Gettys- burg campaign. B'revet Lt.-Col., April 15, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the vf ar. GREEN, TIMOTHY. {Z^Lt. ^th Inf., May 20, '13.) (1st Lt. Arty., Apl. 20, '18.) Brevet Capt., April 20, 1828, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. GREEN, "WILLIAM C. (2d Lt. 1st Inf., Sept. 27, '61.) (Capt. 1st Inf., Jan. I, '67.) Brevet Capt., July 4, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services during the siege of Vicksburg, Miss. GREENE, CHARLES T. (Capt i,2dlnf., July 28, '66.) (Capt. A2d Inf., July 28, '66.) \ Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Ringgold, Ga. GREENE, JAMES D. (Lt.-Col lyih Inf., May 14, '61.) (Col dth Inf., Sept. 20, '63.) Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services dur- ing the war. GREENE, JOHN. (2dLt 22d Inf., Mar. 12, '12.) (Lt.-Col 6th Inf., Apl. 26, 38.) Brevet Maj., September 25, 1824, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. GREENE, OLIVER D. (Bvt 2dLt Arty., July 1, '54.) (A. A. G. (Maj.), July 17, '62.) Brevet Capt., July, 21, 1861, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Bull Run, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13,(1865, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Crampton's Gap, Md. Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Antietam, Md. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. *■ ' GREENE, SAMUEL C. (istLt I'ifh Inf., May 14, '61.) (Capt 2ifh Inf., Dec. 21, '64.) Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for meritorious services in the Subsistence De- partment during the war. GREENLEAF, CHARLES R. (Asst. Surg., Aug. 5, '6l.) (Surg. (Maj.), June 26, '76.) Brevet Capt. and Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865,- for faithful and meritorious services during the war. GREGG, JOHN I. ( 1st Lt I \tk Inf., Apl. 9, '47.) (CoL ?,th Cav., July 28, '66.) Brevet Maj., March 17, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services in action 398 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 at Kelly's Ford, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., October 12, 1863, for gallant and meri- torious' services in action at Sulphur Springs, Va. Brevet Col., October 7, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Deep Bottom, Va. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services in the field during the war. GRE&G, THOMAS J. {2d Lt. 2d Cav., Feb. 23, '66.) {ist Lt. 2d Cav., Sept. i, '66. ) Brevet Capt. and Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. GREY, THOMAS. (idLt. <^h Inf., Dec. 30, '47.) [Capt. 2d Arty., Nov. 4, 63.) Brevet Maj., and Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services. GRIER, 'WILLIAM N. (Bvt. 2d Lt. 1st Drags., July 1, '35.) ( Col. ^d Cav., Aug. 31, '66.) Brevet Maj., March 16, 1848, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Santa Cruz de Resales, Mex. Brevet Col., May 5, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Williamsburg, Va. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. GRIERSON, BENJAMIN H. {Col. loih Cav., July 2%, '66;) {Col. lOth Cav., July 28, '66.) Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the raid through Mississippi in 1863. Brevet Maj.-Gen., March 2, 1867, for gal- lant and meritorious services in the raid through Mississippi, December, 1864. GRIFFIN, CHARLES. {Bvt. 2dLt. ^th Arty., July i, '47.) j (Col. 35/^ Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet Maj., July 21, 1861, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Bull Run, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., May 6, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of the Wilderness, Va. Brevet Col., August 18, 1864, for fgallant and meritorious services at the battle on the Weldon R. R,, Va. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Five Forks, ATa. Brevet Maj.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services in the field during the war. GRIMES, EDWARD B. {A. Q. M. {Capt.), May 26, '65.) {A. Q. M. {Capt.), May 26, '65.) Brevet Maj., May 26, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services in the Quar- termaster's Department during the war. GRIMES, JAMES F. (Capt. lyth Inf., Aug. 5, '61.) (Capt. ijth Inf., Aug. 5, '61.) Brevet Maj., August I, 1864, for gallant services at Spottsylvania and during the campaign before Richmond, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for gal- lant and meritorious services during the war. GRISWOLD, HENRY W. (yl Lt. Arty., Mar. z, '15.) {Capt. 1st Arty., Apl. 26, '32.) Brevet Capt., December 12, 1828, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade- TO THE PRESENT TIME. 399 GROSSMAN, FREDSRICE E. (2(/ /./. -jtK Tnf., Afl. 22, '63.) {Capt. -jth Inf., Oct. 12, '67.) Brevet ist Lt., July, 2, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Capt., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. GROVER, CUVIER. [Bvt. 2d Lt. 1st Arty., July I, '50.) (Col. 1st Cav., Dec. 2, '75-) Brevet Lt.-Col., May 5, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Williamsburg, Va. Brevet Col., May 31, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Fair Oaks, Va. Brevet Brig.-Gen.. March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Cedar Creek, and in the campaign of the Shenandoah Valley, Va. Brevet Maj -Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services in the field during the war. GUENTHER, FRANCIS L. {Bvt. 2d Lt. 1st Arty., July I, '59.) (Capt. tfh Arty , Jidy 2, '63.) Brevet Capt., April 7, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Shiloh, Tenn. Brevet Maj., December 31, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Stone River, Tenn. Brevet Lt.-Col. and Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. GUNTHBR, SEBASTIAN. {fid Lt. 6fh Cav., Aug. 10, '63.) (Capt. ifk Cav., Feb. 10, '70.) Brevet ist Lt., December [6, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services in pursuit of rebel forces under General Hood. Brevet Capt., April 2, 1865, for gallant and merito'rious services at the capture of Selma, Ala. GUTHRIE, PRESLEY N. (Capt. nth Inf., Apl. 9, '47.) (Capt. \Uh Inf., ApL 9, '47.) Brevet Maj., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. HAGEN, OSCAR. (2d Lt nth Inf., Nov. 20, '61.) (Capt. ()th Cav., Jan. 12, '68.) Brevet Capt., March 13, 1865, for'gallant and meritorious conduct in the field during the war. HAGNER, PETER V. f^Bvt. 2d Lt. 1st Arty., July 1, -36.) (Col Ordn., Mar. 7, '67.) Brevet Capt., April 18, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Cerro Gordo. Brevet Maj., September 13, 1847, fo"" gallant and meritorious conduct at Chapultepec. Brevet Col. and Brevet Brig.-Gen. March 13, 1865, for faith- ful and meritorious services in the Ordnance Department. HAIGHT, EDWARD. (\st Lt. 16th Inf., May 14, '61.) (Capt. 16th Inf., Juite 16, 64.) Brevet Maj. and Brevet Lt.-Col., May 5, 1865, for meritorious services during the war. HAINES, THOMAS J. (Bvt 2d Lt 1st Arty., July 1, '49 ) ; ( Com. Subs. (Maj.), Feb. 9, '63.) Brevet Lt.-Col., Brevet Col. and Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for faith- ful and meritorious services during the war. 400 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 HAINS, PETER C. (2dLt. 2d Arty., June 24, '61.) (Maj. Engrs., Sept. Z2, '70.) Brevet Capt., May 27, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the bat- tle of Hanover C. H., Va. Brevet Maj., July 4, 1863, for gallant and meritori- ous services during the siege of Vicksburg, Miss. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. TTAT.T! , CLAYTON. (2dLt. 16M Inf., Feb. 23, '66.) (Capt. \6lh Inf., Sep. 24, '71.) Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the bat- tle of Stone River, Tenn. Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meri- torious services at the battle of Mission Ridge, Tenn. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Franklin, Tenn. HAIiL, CHABLES B. (2dU. 28tA Inf., Jan. 22, '67.) {yst. Lt. igrt Inf., Dec. 28, '68.) I' Brevet 1st Lt., March 2, 1867, for gallamt and meritorious services in the bat- tle of Sabine Cross Roads, La. Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Pleasant Hill, La. HALL, JAIVIES A. {2d Lt. \st Arty., Oct. 24, '6i.) {Capl. 1st Cav., June 3, '64.) Brevet Capt., May 6, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Todd's Tavern, Va. Brevet Maj., April i, 18&5, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle erf Five Forks, Va, HALL, NATHACriEL N. (Ens. 21st Inf., Mar. 12, '12,) iCapt.'2ist Inf., Sept. —, '14.) Brevet Capt., August 15, 1814, for gallant conduct in the defense of Fort Erie. TT AT.T. NORMAN J. (Bvt. 2d Lt. ifh Arty., July i, '59) (Capt. tfh Arty., Aug. i, '63.) Brevet Capt., September 17, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Antietaro. Md. Brevet Maj., December 13, 1862, for gallant, and meritorious services at the battle of Fredericksburg, Va. Brevet Lt. Col., July 3, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. HALL, ROBERT H. (Bvt. 2d Lt. Itk Inf., July 7, '60.) (Capl. loth Inf., Aug. 31, 'dz.) Brevet Maj.. November 24, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Lookout Mountain, Temi. Brevet Lt.-Col., August 19, 1864, for gal- lant and meritorious services in the battle on the Weldon R. R., Va. HALL, ROBERT M. (2d Lt. \st Arty., Oct. 24, '61.) (\st Lt. 1st A; ty., Feb. 20, '62.) Brevet Capt., May 28, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services in action at Bermuda Hundred, Va. Brevet Maj., October 7, 1864, for gallant and meri- torious services in action on the Darbytown Road, near Richmond, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col. and Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. TO THE PRESENT TIME. 4OI HALLECK, HENRY W. (2d Lt. Engrs., July I, '35.) (Maj. Gen., Aug. 19, '61.) Brevet Capt., May i, 1847, for gallant conduct in affairs with the enemy, November 19 and 20, 1847, and for meritorious services in California. HALLER, GRANVILLE O. {zd Lt. 4iA Inf., Nw. 17, '39.) {Maj. -jth Inf., Sept. 25, '61.) Brevet Capt., September 8, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Molino del Rey. Brevet Maj., September 13, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Chapultepec. HAMBRICK, PAUL R. (zd Lt. 45^/4 Inf., July 28, '66.) (ist Lt. i,tfh Inf., Feb. 4, '68.) Brevet ist Lt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in action at Salem Church, Va. HAMBRIGHT, HENRY A. [Capt. iitk Inf, May 14, '61.) (Maj. v^th Inf., Jan. 27, '69.) Brevet Maj., December 31, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Murfreesboro, Tenn. Brevet Lt.-Col., September 20, 1863, for gal- lant and meritorious services at the battle of Chickamauga, Ga. Brevet Col., September l, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services during the Atlanta Campaign. , HAMILTON, CHARLES S. (Bvt. 2d Lt. 2d Inf., July i, '43.) (1st Lt. t,t/i Inf .June yi, '47.) Brevet Capt., August 20, 1847,- for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. HAMILTON, FRANK B. { 2d Lt. yi Arty., June 1 7, '62. ) ( Capt. 2d Arty., July 28, '66.) Brevet ist Lt., September 17, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Antietam, Md. Brevet Capt., July 3, 1863, for gallant and meri- torious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. HAMILTON, JOHN. (2dLt. yl Arty., July i, '47.) (Maj. \<)th Arty., Aug. 13, '66.) Brevet Maj , April 11, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services during the investment of Fort Pulaski, Ga. Brevet Lt.-Col., June 17, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services in action at Secessionville, James Island, S. C. Bre- vet Col., February 20, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Olustee, Fla. HAMILTON, JOHN. (zdLt. 1st Inf., May 12, '63.) ( 1st Lt. 1st Inf., Mar. IJ, '66.) Brevet ist Lt., July 4, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services during the siege of Vicksburg, Miss. HAMILTON, LOUIS M. {2d Lt. T^Inf, Sept. 27, '62.) (Capt "jth Cav., July 28, '66.) Brevet Jst Lt., May 3, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Chancellorsville, Va. Brevet Capt., July 2, 1863, for gallant and meritori- ous' services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Maj., November 27, 1868, for gallant and meritorious services in engagements with the Indians, particu- 18* 402 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 larly in the batt" e with the Cheyennes on the Washita River, November 27, 1868, where he fell while gallantly leading his command. HAMILTON, SCHUYLER. (idtt. 1st Inf., July I, '41.) (A. D. C. to Gen.-in-Chf. [Col.), Aug. 7, '61.) Brevet ist Lt., September. 23, 1846, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Monterey. Brevet Capt., August 13, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Mil Flores, Mexico. ham:ilton,;;thom:as. (Ens. \st Inf., Mar. 6, '06.) (Capt. t^h Inf., Feb. 21, '14.) Brevet Maj., February 21, 1824, for lo'years' faithful service in one grade. HAMMOND, JOHN F. [Asst. Surg., Feb. 16, '47.) [Surg. [Lt.-Col.), Junezd, '76.) Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. HAMMOND, RICHARD P. (Bvt. 2d Lt 2(1 Arty., July i, '41.) (istLt. ^d Arty., May 28, '46.) Brevet Capt., April 18, 1847, for gallant and iheritorious services at Cerro Gordo. Brevet Maj., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Contreras and Churubusco. HAMPSON, JESSE A. P. (2d Lt \ath Inf., Feb. 19, '62.) (Capt. 10th Inf., Feb. 3, '65.) Brevet ist Lt., May 3, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Chancellorsville, Va. Brevet Capt., July 2, 1863, for gallant and meritori- ous services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Maj, March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. HANCOCK, DAVID P. (Bvt. 2d Lt. •jthlnf, July i, '54.) (Maj. 2d Inf., Oct. 24, '74.) Brevet Maj., July 2, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. HANCOCK, 'WINFIBLD S. (Bvt. 2d Lt dth Inf., July i, '44.) (Maj.-Gen.,July26,'(A.) Brevet ist Lt., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churuhusco. Brevet Maj.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Spottsylvania, Va. HANSON, -WEIGHTMAN K. (Bvt 2d Lt. -jth Inf., July I, '35.) (\st Lt -jth Inf., Ji'yy, '38.) Brevet Capt., August 3, 1839, for meritorious conduct and gallantry in the war in Florida. HAPPERSETT, J. C. G. (AsstStrg., Aug. 26, '61.) (Surg. (Afaj.), June 26, 'yd,) Brevet Capt. and Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious ^ervices during the war. TO THE PRESENT TIME. 403 HARBACH, ABRAM A, (zd Lt. nth Inf., June II, '62.) {Capt. zoth Inf., Jan. 22, '67.) Brevet Capt., July 2, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. HARDCASTLE, EDMUND L. (Bvt. zd Lt. Top. Engrs., July i, '46.) (\st Lt. Top. Engrs., July i, '53.) Brevet ist Lt., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. Brevet Capt., September 8, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Molino del Rey. HARDEE, "WILLIAM J. (zd Lt. zd Drags., July i, '38.) (Lt.-Col. \st Cav., June 28, '60.) Brevet Maj., March 25, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Medelin, near Vera Cruz, Mex. Brevet Lt.-Col., August 20, 1847, for gallant and merito- rious conduct at San Augustine, Mex. HARDIE, JAMES A. (Bvt. zd Lt \st Arty., July i, '43 ) (Inspector-Gen. (Col), Mar. zi„ '64) Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 3, 1865, for diligent and faithful services during the war. Brevet Maj.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for faithful, meritoripus and distin- guished services in the Inspector-General's Department. HARDIN, MARTIN D. (Bvt. zd Lt. ^d Arty., July i, '59.) (J. ^"g- 12, '47- ) Brevet Capt., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. HARNEY, WILLIAM S. (zdLt. 1st Inf., Feb. 3, '18.) _ (Brig.-Gen.. June 14, '58.) Brevet Col., December 7, 1840, for gallaiit and nferitqrious conduct in several 404 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 enga^rements with hostile Indians in Florida. Brevet Brig.-Gen., April 18, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Cerro Gordo. Brevet Maj,-Gen., March 13, 1865, for long and faithful services. HARPER, "WILIiIAM, Jr. (2dLt. (,th dm., Oct. 18, '66.) [Capt. &k Cat/., Jan. 27, '75.) Brevet ist Lt., Brevet Capt. and Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. HARRIS, BD"WARD. (id Lt. t,th Cav., June 7, '64.) (irf Lt. tfk Cav., Sept. 29, '64-) Brevet ist Lt, May 6, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Todd's Tavern, Va. Brevet Capt., September 19, i864,for gallant and meri- torious services at the battle of Winchester, Va. HARRIS, MOSES. (2d Lt. 1st Cav., May 18, '64.) (Capt. 1st. Cav., June 20, '72-) Brevet Capt., September 19, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Winchester, Va. HARRIS, SAMUEL D. (Capt. Light Drags., Mar. 21, '12.) (Paymaster -Jih Jnf., Feb. 7, '21.) Brevet Mii , July 5, 18 14, for gallant conduct at the battle of Chippewa. Brevet Lt.-Col., July 25, 1814, for distinguished services at the battle of Ni- agara. HARRIS, WILLIAM H. (Bvt. 2d Lt. Ordn , June 24, '6t.) (Capt. Ordn , June i, '63.) . Brevet Maj. and Brevet Lt.-Col., August i, i864,for gallant and efficient ser- vices in the battles from tlie Ripidan to Peteriljurg, Va HARRISON, JAMES E. (zdLt. ith Cav., June 27, '56.) (Capt. ^th Cav., May 30, '61.) Brevet Maj., May 27, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Hanover C. H., Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., September 17, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Antietam, Md. HARRISON, ROBERT. (2d Lt i^th Inf., Feb. 19, '63.) (Capt. i^d Inf., Mar. 7, '67.) Brevet Capt., September 1, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services during the Atlanta campaign. HARRISON, THOMAS. (2d Lt. 2\st Inf., May 15, '12.) (Capt. Ofth Inf., Aug. 15, '13.) Brevet Maj., July 5, 18 14, for gallant conduct at the battle of Chippewa. HARRISON, -WILLIAM H. (2d Lt. 2d Cav., Nov. 30, '61.) (Capt. 2d Cav., — , '66.) Brevet Capt., May 6, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Todd's Tavern, Va.* Brevet Maj., September 19, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Winchester, Va. HART, DANIEL. (\st Lt. i,ath Inf., Jan. 22, '67.) (Capt. 2tfh Inf., N(w. 30, '73.) Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the bat- TO THE PRESENT TIME. 4O5 tie of Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of the Wilderness, Va. HART, VERLING K. {Capt. \r)th Inf., Oct. 30, '6t.) [Mij. %th Ow., Dec. 2, '75.) Brevet Maj., September 30, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Chickamauga, Ga. Brevet Lt.-Col., Marph 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. HARTSUFP, ALBERT. [Asst. Stirg., Aug. 5, '61.) (Surg. [Maj.\ June 26, '76-) Brevet Capt. and Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. Brevet Lt.-Col., November 26, 1866, for meritoriou.= and distinguished services during the outbreak and continuance of cholera in New Orleans, La. HARTSUFP, GEORGE L. (Bvt. 2d Lt. 4//i A ty., July i, '52.) (A. A. C. (Lt.-Col.), June t, '64.) Brevet Col., September 17, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Antietam, Md. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services in the campaign terminating in the surrender of Lee's army. Brevet Maj.-Gcn., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services in the field during the war. HARTWBIjL, CHARLB.g A. [ist Lt. iit/i Inf., Aug. 5, '61.) (Capt. nth Inf., 0:1. 4, '66.) Brevet Capt., June 27, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the bat- tle of Gaines's Mills, Va. Brevet iVIaj., June 14, 1863, for gallant and merit orious .services at the siege of Port Hudson, La. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. HARTZ, -WILSON T. {2d Lt ie,th Inf.,May II, '66.) (ist Lt ic^t/i Inf., June 17, '67.) Brevet ist Lt. and Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gill nt and meritorious services in the battle of Fair Oaks, Va. Brevet Maj., March 2, 106;, for ga.- lant and meritorious services in the battle of Fredericksburg, Va. HARVrOOD, FRANKLIN. (2d Lt. T,d Arty., May 6, '61.) (Maj. Engrs., Feb. 22, '69.) Brevet Maj., August i, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services during the campaign before Richmond, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., April 9, 1865, for fauhful and meritorious services during the operations resulting in the fall of Richmond and surrender of General Lee. HASBROTJCS:, HENRY C. {2d Lt. ^th Arty., May 6, '61. 1 {Cipt. ^fh Arty.. July 2'). '66 ) Brevet Capt., October 25, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services in ac- tion at Blackwater Bridge, near Suffolk, Va. Brevet Maj., April ^, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the siege of Petersburg. Va. HASCALL, HERBERT A. (2d Lt. s,th Arty., July I, '56.) {Capt ^t'l Arty.. July 13, '62.) Brevet Maj. and Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, fur I'ai.h.ul and meritoriou.-j services during the war. 406 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 HASKIN, JOSEPH A. (zdLt. 1st Arty., July i, '39.) (Zi.-Col. ist Arty., July 26, '66.) Brevet Capt., April 18, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Cerro Gordo. Brevet Maj., September 13, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Chapultepec. Brevet Lt.-Col., Brevet Col., and Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. HASKIN, ^VILLIAM L. (2dLt. isf Arty., Aug. 5, '61.) (Capt. 1st Arty., July 28, '66.) Brevet Capt., July 8, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the capture of Port Hudson, La. Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for good conduct and gal- lant services during the war. HASSLER, JOHN J. S. (id Lt. Afh Inf., Feb. 19, '63.) (1st Lt. ifh Inf., Aug. 25, '64.) Brevet Capt., April 2, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services in front of Petersburg, Va. HASSON, ALEXANDER B. \ [Asst.Surg., June 29, '49.) [Surg. (Maj.), Aug. 17, '61.) Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. HASTINGS, JAMES. (2d Lt. tfh Cav., July 17, '62.) (Caft. $tk Cav., Aug. 11, '67.) Brevet Capt, September 19, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Winchester, Va. Brevet Maj., March 31, 1861;, for gallant and merit- orious services at the battle of Dinwiddle C. H., Va. HATCH, EDWARD. (Col. <)th Cav., July 28, '66.) (Col. C)tk Cav., July 28, '66.) Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Franklin, Tenn. Brevet Maj.-Gen., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Nashville, Tenn., December, 1864. HATCH, JOHN P. (Bvt. 2d Lt Zdlnf, July 1, '45.) (Lt.-Col. 4/A Cav., Jan. 15, '73.) Brevet ist Lt., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. Brevet Capt., September 13, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Chapultepec. Brevet Maj., August 30, 1862, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Manassas, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., September 14, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of South Mountain, Md. Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services in the field during the war. HATHAWAY, FORREST H. (2d Lt. s,ut Inf., Mar. 7, '67 ) (2d Lt. ffh Inf., Mar. 7 '67.) Brevet ist Lt., March 7, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the bat- tle of Fair Oaks, Va. Brevet Capt., March 7, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of New Market, Va. HATHEWAY, JOHN S. (Bvt. 2d Lt. 1st Arty, July 1, '36.) (Capt. 1st Arty., Mar^ 3, '47 ) Brevet Maj., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras aid Churubusco. TO THE PRESENT TIME. '407 HAWES, JAMES M. (Bvt. id Lt. zd Dm^., July I, '45.) (Cipt. 2d Drains , Dec. 13, '55.) Brevet ist Lt., August i, 1847, fo"^ gallant and meritorious conduct at San Juan de los Llanos, Mex. HAWKINS, EDG-AR S. \zdLt. id Inf., July i, '20.) (Maj. \st Inf., Feb. 16, '47.) Brevet Maj., May 9, 1846, for gallant and distinguished services in defense of Fort Brown. HAWKINS, HAMILTON S. {p.d Lt. 6th Inf., Apl. 26, '61.) [Capt. 6th Inf., Sept. 20, '63.) Brevet Capt., July 2, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Maj., October 1 1, 1865, for meritorious services. HAWKINS, JOHN P. (Bvt2d Lt. 6th Inf., July i, '52.) [Com. Subs. (Mij.), June 23, '74) Brevet Maj., and Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the siege of Mobile, Ala. Brevet Col., March 13, i86s,.for gallant and meritorious services during the war. Brevet Brig.-Gen. and Brevet Maj.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious .services in the field during the war. HAir, CHARLES E. (2d U. 3d C.W., Au^. 5, '6i.) (1st Lt 3d Cav., Nov. 5, '6i.) Brevet Capt., June 22, 1865, for meritorious services during the war. HAY, THOMAS H. (ist Lt. ^zd Inf., Jan. 22, '67.) (xst Lt. ^2d Inf., Jan. 22, '67.) Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the bat- tle of Chancellorsville, Va. Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meri- torious services in the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. HAYDBN, HORACE J. (2d Lt. 2d Arty., Aug. t„ '61.) (ist Lt. ^d Arty., Aug. ^,'61. ) Brevet Capt., June 27, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the bat- tle of Gaines's Mills, Va. Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for good conduct and gallant services during the war. HAYDBN, JEREMIAH D. (ist Lt. i^th Inf., Mar. 12, 'j2.) (Capt \$th Inf., Mar. 13, '13.) Retained, December, 1815 (in reorganization under act of March 3, 1815)^ as ist Lt. Artillery, with Brevet of Capt. from March 13, 1813. HAYDEN, JULIXIS. (2d Lt 2d Inf., Jan. 16,' 2, [Capt. ifh Cav., — , — .) Brevet ist Lt., May 10, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services in cavalry action at Franklin, Tenn. Brevet Capt., December 16, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services during the pursuit of the rebel forces under General Hood. Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. HEGER, ANTHONY. (Asst. Surg., Aug. 29, '56.) (Surg. (Maj.), Sept. 17, '62.) Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. HEILEMAN, JULIUS F. (zd Lt. Arty., Mar. 6, '06.) (Maj. 2d Arty., Nov. 17, '34.) Brevet Maj , May 5, 1823, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. Brevet 4IO BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 Lt.-Col., June 9, 1836, for gallant and good conduct in the affair of Micanopyi Fla. HBILMAN, -WILLIAM H. [2dLt. \ith Inf., Aug. 13, '62.) (.Capf. \tfh Inf., May 11, '67.) Brevet ist Lt., September 20, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Chickamauga, Ga. HEINTZELMAN, SAMUEL P. {Bvt. zdLt. -id Inf., July i, '26.) [Col. lyth Inf., Slay 14, '61.) Brevet Maj., October 9, .1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Hua- mantla, Mex. Brevet Lt.-Col., December 19, 1851 (Services not specified). Brevet Brig. -Gen., May 31, 1862, for gallant and meritorious conduct at the battle of Fair Oaks, Va. Brevet Maj.-Gen., Marcti 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Williamsburg, Va. HBLM, ISAAC A. [zd Lt. yl Inf., Aug. 5, '61.) l,iU Lt. yl Inf., Sept. 11, '63.) Brevet ist Lt., May 3, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the bat- tle of Chancellorsville, Va. Brevet Capt., July 2, 1863, for gallant and meri- torious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. HBNDERSHOTT, HENRY B. i,Bvt. zdLt. tfh Inf., July i, '47.) [Capt. zd Arty., Apl. 27, '61.) Brevet Maj., Brevet Lt.-Col. and Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services, connected with the recruitment and organization of the volunteer armies of the United States during the war. HENDRICESON, THOMAS. {zdLt. dth Inf., July 31, '38.) {Maj. yl Inf., June 27, '62.) Brevet Capt., August 20, 1847, foi- gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. Brevet Lt.-Col., July i, 1862, for gallant and meri- torious services at the battle of Malvern Hill, Va. Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious conduct during the war. HENRY, GUY V. {zd Lt. 1st Arty., May 6, '61.) {Capt. yl Cav., Dec. 1, '65.) Brevet Capt., October 22, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services in action near Pocotaligo River, S. C. Brevet Maj., February 20, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at-the battle of Olustee, Fla. Brevet Lt.-Col., September 29, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services in front of Petersburg, Va. Brevet Col., March I3;i865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. HENRY, THOMAS. {zd Lt. -jtk Inf., May 20, '47.) {1st Lt. "jth Inf., Oct. 24, '53.) Brevet ist Lt., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. HENRY, ■WILLIAM S. (Bvt. zd Lt. yl Inf., July i, '35.) {Capt. zd Inf., May i8, '46.) Brevet Maj., September 23, 1846, for gallant and meritorious conduct in several conflicts at Monterey. HENSHAW, JOHN C. {zd Lt. -jth Tnf, July i, '39.) {Capt. -jth Inf, Mar. 3, '47.) Brevet Maj., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. TO THE PRESENT TIME. 4II HENTON, JAMES. {,2dLt. -i^th Inf., Oct. 5, '61.) {^Capt. 2;^ Inf., Nov. 4, '65.) Brevet Capt., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the bat- tle of Gettysburg, Pa. HICKS, JOHN W. (ist Lt. 2ath Inf., July 28, '66.) (irf Lt. 2otk Inf., July 28, '(A.) Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the assault on Fort Wagner, S. C. HIGBEE, GEORGE H. {\st Lt. nth Inf., May 1:4, '6i.) (Capt. nth Inf., Feb. 19, '66.) Brevet Capt., May 5, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of the Wilderness, Va. Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritori- ous services in front of Petersburg, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for meritorious services in the battles before Petersburg and on the Weldon R. R., Va. ■ ' • HIGGS, AUGUSTUS P. (2dLt. iSth Inf., June 18, '67.) (2d Lt. 16th Inf., June 18, '67.) Brevet ist Lt., June 18, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the siege of Vicksburg, Miss. HH.DEBURN, SAMUEL. {2d Lt. id Call., Feb. 19, '63.) (Capt. yl Cav., Jan. 3, '69.) Brevet ist Lt., November 15, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services in action near Tuscumbia, Ala. HILDT, JOHN MC. L. (Bvt. 2d Lt. 6th Inf., July i, '56.) (Capt. yl Inf., May 30, '61.) Brevet Maj., July i, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battles of Gaines's Mills and Malvern Hill, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. HILL, BENNETT H. (2d Lt. 1st Arty., July i, '37.) (Lt.-Col. <^th Arty., Aug. i, '63.) Brevet Col., January 31, 1865. (Services not specified.) Brevet, Brig.-Gen.i January 31, 1865. (Services not specified.) HILL, DANIEL H. (Bvt. 2dLt. 1st Arty., July i, '42.) (u/ Lt. Afh Inf., Mar. 3, '47.) Brevet Capt., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. Brevet Maj., September 13, 1847, for, gallant and meritorious conduct in the storming of Chapultepec. HILL, GEORGE D. { \st Lt. 42d Inf., July 28, '66. ) (ist Lt. /^2d Inf., July 28, '66. ) Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the bat- tle of Appomattox C. H., Va. HILL, RICHARD M. (Bvt. 2d Lt. Ordn., June 24, '61.) (Maj. Ordn., June 2^ '74.) Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services in the Ordnance Department. 412 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8 12 HTLLART, MICHAEL. (Asst.Surg., Ju1ie\i, '63.) {.Asst. Surg.', June 13, '63.) Brevet Capt., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services. HINDMAN, JACOB. (zd Lt. tfh Inf., May 3, '08.) [Maj. 2d Arty., June 26, '13.) '" Brevet Lt.-Gol., August 15, 1814, for gallant conduct in defense of Fort Erie. Brevet Col., May 17, 1815, for distinguished services. HINKS, EDWARD "W. 2d Lt. 2d Cav., Apl. 26, '61.) [Lt.-Col. ipth Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet Col., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Antietam, Md. Brevet Brig.-G'en., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritori- ous services in the assault on Petersburg, Va. HITCHCOCK, ETHAN A. [,T,dLt. Arty., July 17, '17.) (Col. 2d Inf., Apl. 15, '51.) Brevet Col., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious co nduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. Brevet Brig.-Gen., September 8, 1.847, for .gallant and meritorious conduct at Molino del Rey. HITCHCOCK, JOHN P. (,2dLt. i8tA Inf., June, '1862.) [zd Lt. iSiA Inf., —June, '62.) Brevet ist Lt„ December 31, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Murfreesboro, Tenn. HOAG, JOHN M. (irf Lt. 44M Inf., July 28, '66.) (\st Lt. i^h Inf., July 28, 'b(>.) Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in action at Chapin's Farm, Va. HOAQLAND, MOSES. (Capt. \tfh Inf., Apl. 9, '47.) (Caft. itfh Inf., Apl. 9, '47.) Brevet Maj., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. HOBBS, CHARLES W. (zd Lt. 2,d Arty., Sept. 21, '67.) (ist Lt. yl Arty., Dec. 20, '1875.) Brevet ist Lt., September 21, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Spottsylvania, Va. Brevet Capt., September 21, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Cold Harbor, Va. HODGES, HENRY C. (Bvt. 2dLt. /[thlnf, July i, '51.) (Dep. Q. M. Gen. (Lt.-Col), May 29, '76.) Brevet Maj. and Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. HOFFMAN, WILLIAM. (IJ^ Lt. 4irf Inf., Nov. II, '^g.) (Lt.-Col. -jth Inf., July 15, '45.) Brevet Maj., May i, 1829, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. HOFFMAN, WILLIAM. (Bvt. 2dLt.6th Inf., July i, '29.) (Col. t^ Inf., Apl. 25, '62.) Brevet Maj., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- TO THE PRESENT TIME. 413 treras and Churubusco. Brevet Lt.-Col., September 8, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Molino del Rey. Brevet Brig.-Gen., October 7, 1864, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. Brevet Maj.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for faithful, meritorious and distiinguished services as Commissary General of Prisoners during the war. HOGARTY, WILLIAM P. (2th Inf., July 28, '66. ) { Capt' -id Inf., Jidy 28, '66.) Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the as- sault on Fort Gregg. HULL, 5ROBERT B. (\st Lt. i%th Inf., May 14, '61.) {Capt. iSth Inf., Oct. 25, '61.) Brevet Maj., December 31, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of MurfreesBoro, Tenn. Brevet Lt.-Col., September i, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services during the Atlanta campaign, and in the battle of Jonesboro, Ga. HUMBER, CHARLES H. (2dLt. ytk Inf., July i, '40.) (Capt. -jth Inf., July 16, '50.) Brevet Capt., April 18, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Cerro Gordo. HUMPHREY, BALLARD S. (2d Lt. 1st Arty., Oct. 22, '62.) (ist Lt. 1st Arty., June 4, '64.) Brevet ist Lt., May 26, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services during an assault upon Port Hudson, La. Brevet Capt., March 13, 1865, for good con- duct and gallant services during the war. .. HUMPHREYS, ANDREW A. (Bvt zd Lt. 2d Arty , July i, '31.) (C/if. of Engrs. (Brig.-Gen),Aug. 8, '66.) Brevet Col., December 13 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Fredericksburg, Va. Brevet Bri.?.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Maj.-Geii., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Sailor's Creek, Va. HUMPHREYS, ENOCH. (Lt. Art. and Engrs., May 3, 'oS.) (Capt. Arty., Jan. 9, '09.) Brevet Maj., December 23, 1814, for gallant conduct at the siege of New Orleans. HUMPHREYS, GAD. (\stLt. eth Inf., May 3, '08.) (Lt.-Col. 2d Inf., May 13, '20.) Retained, December, 1815 (in reorganization under act of March 3, 1815), as Capt., 6th Infantry, with Brevet of Maj. from April 18, 1814 (the date of his appointment as Maj. 4th Inf.) HUMPHREYS, HENRY H. (2dLt. lyth Inf., Feb. 23, '66.) (Capt. i-jth Inf., Jan. 15, '73.) Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the bat- tle of Fredericksburg, Va. Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and merito- rious services in the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Lt -Col., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the fall of Petersburg, Va., and'in the pursuit o£ the rebel army under General Lee. TO THE PRESENT TIME. 4I9 HUNT, FRANKLIN E. (Bvt. 2d Lt. nth Arty., July 1, '29.) (Paymaster (Ma/.), Mar. 2, '55.) Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. HUNT, HENRY J. (2d I.t. id Arty., July I, '39.) (Col. ^th Arty., Apt. 4, '69.) Brevet Capt., August 20, 1847, f°'' gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. Brevet Maj., September 13, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Chapultepec. Brevet Col., July 3, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the siege of Petersburg, Va., &c. Brevet ■Maj.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services in the field during the war. HUNT, JAMES C. (2d Lt. 1st Caw., Feb. 19, '62.) (Capt. 1st Cav., June 28, '64.) Brevet Capt., May 6, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Todd's Tavern, Va. Brevet Maj., April, i, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Five Forks, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., January 29, 1867, for gallantry in an engagement with a band of Indians at Steer's Mountain, Oregon, January 29, 1867. HUNT, LEWIS C. (Bvt. zdLt. 2^ Inf., July i, '47.) (Lt.-Col. 20th Inf., Mar. 29, '68.) Brevet Maj., May 31, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Fair Oaks, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., December 14, 1862, for gxUant and merito- rious services at the battle of Kinston, N. C. Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services in the field during the war. HUNT, THOMAS B. "" " (A. Q. M. (Capt.), Jan. 18, '67.) (A. Q. M. (Capt.), Jan. 18, '67.) Brevet Maj. and Brevet Lt.-Col., January 18, 1867, for faithful and efficient services in the Quartermaster's Department during the war. HUNT, THOMAS F. (id Lt' Light Drags., July 2, '13.) (A. Q.M. Gen. (Col), Sept. 16, '51.) Brevet Maj., June 16, 1828, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. Brevet Col., May 30, 1848, for meritorious conduct during the war with Mexico. HUNTER, DAVID. (2d Lt. tfh Inf., July I, '22.) (Col. dth Cav., May 14, '61.) Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Piedmont, and during the campaign in the Valley of Virginia. Brevet Maj.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. HUNTER, JOHN. (2dLt. 10th Inf., May :8, '64.) (1st Lt. \oth Inf., Mar. 20, '65.) Brevet ist Lt., October i, 1864, for gallant services at the battle of Chapel House, Va. 420 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 HUNTER, JOHN F. i,Capt. 11th Inf., Apl. 9, '47.) (Maj. 11th Inf., Apl. 9, '47-) Brevet Lt.-Col., August 20, 1847, f°f gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. HUNTINGTON, DAVID L. [Asst. Surg., yuly 1 1, '62.) (^•'■f'- Surg., July 1 1, '62.) Brevet Capt. and Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. HUNTINGTON, ED"WARD S. (zdLt. 11th Inf. Apl. 14, '62.) ^Capt. z<)th Inf., yune 25, '67.) Brevet Capt., July 2, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. HUNTINGTON, HENRY A. (2dLt. ifh Arty., Oct. 24, '61.) {1st Lt. ifh Arty., May 3, '63.) Brevet ist Lt., April 7, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the bat- tle of Shiloh, Tenn. Brevet Capt., December 31, 1862, for gallant and meri- torious services at the battle of Stone River, Tenn. Brevet Maj., March 13 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. HURST, JOSEPH H. ffld Lt. 12th Inf., Mar. 7, '67.) {.1st Lt. 12th Inf., Jan. 31, '74.) Brevet ist Lt., March 7, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Chancellorsville, Va. Brevet Capt., March 7, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Spottsylvania, Va. HUSTON, DANIEL, Jr. (Bvt 2d Lt %th Inf., July 1, '48.) {Lt.-Col. (>th Inf., Feb. 22, '69.) Brevet Maj., August 10, 1861, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Wilson's Creek, Mo. Brevet Lt.-Col., July 4, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services during the siege of Vicksburg, Miss. Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. HUTCHINS, BENJAMIN T. {1st Lt. 6th Cav., May 14, '61.) {Capt 6th Cav., Ncv. 19, '63.) Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. HUTCHINSON, MERRILL N. {2dLt i%th Inf., June 9, '62.) {1st Lt. 18th Inf., Jan. 14, '63.) Brevet Capt., September 20, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Chickamauga, Ga. HUXFORD, WILLIAM P. {Capt A,2dlnf., July 28, '66.) [Capt. ifld Inf., July 2%, '66.) Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the assault of Port Hudson, La. HYDE, RUSSEL B. {2d Lt. loth Inf., Apl. 30, '13.) {Capt. 8th Inf., Oct 31, '18.) Brevet Maj., October 31, 1828, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. TO THE PRESENT TIME. 421 IDE, WILLIAM C. {ist Li. lyA Inf., May 14, '61.) {Capt. i2tA Inf., May 14, '62.) Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for meritorious services during the war. IHBIE, GEORGE F. (zd Lt. 2iclArty., June i, '55.) [Paymaster (Maj.), Apl. 14, '66.) Brevet Lt.-Col. Brevet Col., and Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 2, 1867, for gal- lant and meritorious services during the war, at the siege of Corinth, at luka, battle of Corinth, Tallahatchie, advance on Grenada, Jackson, Humboldt, and siege of Vicksburg. ILGES, GUIDO. (Capt. 14M Inf., May 14, '61.) (MaJ. -jth Inf., Dec. 10, '73.) Brevet Maj., August 1, 1864, for gallant services at the battles of the Wilder- ness and Spottsylvania, and during the campaign before Richmond, Va. Bre- vet Lt.-Col., August I, 1864, for gallant services at Spottsylvania, Va. ILSLEY, CHARLES S. {2dLt. xdth Inf., Feb. 23, '66.) (Capt. "jth Cav., July 11, '71.) Brevet Capt., March_,2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. INGALLS, RUFUS. (Bvt. 2dLt. Rifles, July 1, '43.) (A. Q. M. Gen. [Col.), July 29, 'i^.) Brevet ist Lt., February 4, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Em- budo and Taos, N. M. Brevet Lt.-Col., Brevet Col., and Brevet Brig.-Gen., July 6, 1864, for meritorious and distinguished services during the war. Brevet Maj. Gen., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. INGERTON, WILLIAM H. (2dLt. idth Inf., May 14, '61.) [Capt. 16th Inf., — , — .) Brevet Capt, April 7, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Shiloh, Tenn. Brevet Maj., December 31, 1862, for gallant and meri- torious services at the battle of Murfreesboro, Tenn. INGHAM, GEORGE T. [ist Lt. iltk Inf., May 14, '6l.) (istLt. iitk Inf., May 14, '61.) Brevet Capt., and Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services. INMAN, HENRY. [2d Lt. lytk Inf., May 14, '6l.) [A. Q. M. [Capt.), Mar. 18, '64.) Brevet Capt., June 27, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gaines's Mills, Va. Brevet Maj., November 27, 1866, for faithful and meri- torious services in the Quartermaster's Department. Brevet Lt.-Col., February II, i86g, for meritorious services during the campaign against Indians. IRELAND, DAVID. (Capt. itfhlnf, Aug. 5, '61.) [Capt. i^tA Inf., Aug. 5, '61. Brevet Maj., May 3, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Chancellorsville, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., September i, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services during the Atlanta campaign. 422 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l3 IRISH, DALLAS C, (Capt. iith Inf., Aug. 5, '61.) (Capt. i^tA Inf., Aug. 5, '61.) Brevet Maj., January lo, 1863, for 'gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Arkansas Post, Ark. Brevet Lt.-Col., July 4, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services during the siege of Vicksburg, Miss. IRWIN, BERNARD J. D. {Asst. Surg, Aug 28, '66.) {.Surg. (Maj.), Sept 16, '62.) Brevet Lt.-Col. and Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. IRVriN, DOUGLASS S. (Bvt. zd Lt. dth Inf., fuly i, '40.) {\st Lt. yl Inf., May 18, '46.) Brevet ist Lt., September 7, 1841, for gallant and good conduct in vfar against Florida Indians. IRWIN, JAMES R. {Bvt. zd Lt. zd Arty., July i, '25.) (Capt, \st Arty., May 16, '42.) Brevet Capt., August 21, 1836, for gallant and good conduct in war against Florida Indians. IRWIN, JOHN A. (2dLt. 6th Cav., July 17, '62.) [Capt. 6th Cav. June 8, '67.) Brevet Capt., March 30, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle on the White Oak Road, Va. ISAACS, ANDREW J. (2dLt. lifh Inf., Mar 18, '47.) (id Lt. 14th Inf., Mar. 18, '47.) Brevet ist Lt. September 13, 1847, ^°^ gallant and meritorious conduct at Chapultepec. JACKSON, ALLAN H. {2dLt. ith Inf., May 11, '66.) (ist Lt. -jth Inf., Jan. i, '71.) Brevet ist Lt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the bat- tle of Chancellorsville, Va. Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867. for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Chattanooga Tenn. JACKSON, JAMES. {idLt. I2th Inf.. Apl. 22, '63.) (Capt. 1st Cav., Feb. 17, '68.) \. Brevet Capt., August 18, 1864, for gallant services at the battle of the North Anna River, Va. Brevet Maj., August 18, 1864, for gallant services at the battle on the Weldon R. R., Va. JACKSON, JOHN. (2dLt ^th Inf., Oct 31, '61.) (Capt. yth Inf., May 18, '64.) Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the bat- tle of.Gettysburg, Pa. . • ». JACKSON, JOHN H. (\st Lt. <)th Inf., Apl. 9, '47.) (Capt. <)th Inf., Dec. —, '47.) Brevet Capt., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. TO THE PRESENT TIME. ^23 JACKSON, MASON. {2d Lt. isrt Inf., Nov. 24, '63.) [Capt. nth Inf., Sept. 14, '67.) Brevet Capt., September i, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services du- ring the Atlanta campaign. JACKSON, RICHARD H. (Bvt. 2d Lt. ifh Arty., Sept. 13, '59.) [Capt. 1st Arty., Feb. 20, '62.) Brevet Maj., May i c, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Drury's Bluff, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., October 7, 1864, for gallant and meritori- ous services in action at New Market Heights, Va. Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services in the field during the war. JACKSON, THOMAS J. (Bvt. 2d Lt. 1st Arty., July t, '46.) {ist Lt. -ist Arty., Aug. 20, '47.) Brevet Capt., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. Brevet Maj., September 13, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Chapultepec. JANES, HENRY W. [A. Q. M. (Capt.), Oct. 30, '63.) (A. Q. M. {Capt.), Oct. 30, '63.) Brevet Maj., and Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. JANETVAY, JOHN H. {Asst. Surg., Aug. 26, '61.! {Surg. (Maj.), June 26, '76.) Brevet Capt., February 20, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Olustee, Fla. Brevet Maj. and Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. JAQUETT, GEORGE P. {Asst. Surg., Oct. 23, '61.) (Asst. Surg., Oct. 23, '61.) Brevet Capt. and Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. JARVIS, CHARLES E. {Bvt. 2d Lt yl Inf., July 1, '43.) {ist Lt. 2d Inf., Jan. 12, '48.) Brevet ist Lt., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Contre- ras and Churubusco. JBNNI GS, GILBERT S. (2dLt. i,zdlnf., Jan. 22, '67.) {\st Lt. 1st Inf., May 4, '73.) Brevet ist Lt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Groveton, Va. Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Fredericksburg, Va. JEROME, AARON B. {2d Lt. &t/i Cav., June r8, '67.) {\st Lt. %th Cav., Aug. 10, '69.) Brevet ist Lt., June 18, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. Brevet Capt., June 18, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the Signal Corps during the war. 424 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 JESUP, THOMAS S. (2dLt. jth Inf., May 3, '08.) (& ^- G^«»- [Brig.-Gen.), May 8, '18.) Brevet Lt.-Col., July 5, 1814, for distinguished and meritorious services at the battle of Chippevfa. Brevet Col., July 25, 1814, for gallant conduct at the bat- tle of Niagara. Brevet Maj.-Gen., May 8, 1828, for loyears' faithful service in one grade. JE-WETT, CHARLES E. (2dLt. loth Inf.,Feb. 23, '66.) i,\st Lt. \oth Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. JEWUTT, HORACE. (istLt. 15M Inf., May 14, '61.) [Capt. 15M Inf., Dec. 31, '62.) Brevet Capt., December 31, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battles of Shiloh and Murfreesboro, Tenn. Brevet Maj., September r, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services during the Atlanta Campaign, and at the battle of Jonesboro, Ga. JOHNS, WILLIAM B. (Bvt. id Lt. %th Inf., July i, '40. ) ( Capt yl. Inf., Dec. 4, '47.) Brevet Capt., April 18, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Cerro Gordo. JOHNSON, ED\7ARD. (2d Lt. 6th Inf., July 1, '38.) (Capt. dtk Itif, Apl. 15, '51.) Brevet Capt., September 8, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Moli- no del Rey. Brevet Maj., September 13, 1847, for gallant conduct at Chapul- tepec. JOHNSON, JOHN B. (ut Lt. 6th. Cav., May 14, '61.) (Capt. 6th Cav., Feb. 3, '65.) Brevet Maj. and Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for meritorious services during the wrar. JOHNSON, LEWIS. (xst Lt. i,ist Inf., July 28, '66.) (Capt. z^th Inf., Dec. 12, '67.) Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the bat- tle of Mill Spring, Ky. Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the siege of Corinth, Miss. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 2, 1867, for gal- lant and meritorious services in the battle of Mission Ridge, Tenn. JOHNSON, RICHARD W. (Bvt. 2d Lt 6th Inf., July i, '49.) (Maj. \th Cav., July 17, '62.) Brevet 'Lt.-Col., September 20, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Chickamauga, Ga. Brevet Col., November 24, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Chattanooga, Tenn. Brevet Brig.- Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services in the field during the war. Brevet Maj.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious ser- vices in the field during the war. JOHNSON, BETH. (Ens. XTfh Inf., Oct. 27, '13.) (Capt. 2d Inf., Sept. 13, '31 .) Brevet Capt., May i, 1829, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade.- TO THE PRESENT TIME. 42$ JOHNSTON, JOHN L. {ut Lt. 2ut Inf., July, 28, '66.) [Capt. 21st Inf., May 29, '74.) Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the first assault at Petersburg, Va. JOHNSTON, JOSEPH E. (2dLt. s,th Arty., July i, '29,) [Q M. Gen. [Brig.-Gen.), June 28, '60 ) Brevet Capt., July 7, 1838, for gallantry on several occasions in war with the P'lorida Indians. Brevet Maj. and Brevet Col., April 12, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Cerro Gordo. Brevet Lt.-Col., September 13, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Chapultepec. (For particulars of this case, see narrative, chapter to.) JOHNSTON, ROBERT E. {Capt. i^yi Inf., July 28, '66.) {Capt. 1st Inf., July 28, '(A.) Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the bat- tle of Gaines's Mills, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Fredericksburg, Va. JOHNSTON, -WILLIAM H. (Paymaster (Maj.), July 28, '66.) , (Paymaster (Maj.), July 28, '66.) Brevet Lt.-Col., March 2, 1867, for faithful and meritorious services in the Fay Department during the war. JONES DAVID R. (Bvt. 2d Lt. 2d Inf., July, i, '46.) (A. A. G. (Bvt. Capt.), Mar. 16, '53.) Brevet ist Lt, August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Contreras and Churubusco. JONES, JACOB D. (\st Lt. igth Inf., May 14, '61.) (Capt. i.) Brevet Maj., April i, 1823, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade Brevet Maj.-Gen., December 6. 1846, for gallant and meritorious conduct in New Mex- ico and California, to date from the battle of San Pasqual. KEARSLEY, JONATHAN. (irf Lt. 2d Arty., Mar. 12, '12.) [A. A. G, [Maj), Aug. 20, '14.) Brevet Capt., August 15, 1814, for gallant conduct in defense of Fort Erie. KEEFFE, JOSEPH. (Bvt. 2d Lt. 2d Arty., Oct. 22, '62.) [\st Lt. t,th Arty., July 28, '66.) Brevet ist Lt., November 29, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services during the defense of Fort Sanders, Tenn. Brevet Capt., September 23, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Fisher's Hill, Va. KEELER, BIRNEY B. [\stLt. T,gth Inf, July 28, '66.) [Capt. iWi Inf., June 5, '68.) Brevet Capt., IMarch 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the ac- tion at Chapin's Farm, Va. Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meri- torious services in the assault on Fort Fisher, N. C. KEENEY, CHARLES C. [Asst. Surg., July 12, '42.) [Surg. [Lt.-CoL), June 26, '76.) Brevet Lt.Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. KELLIHER, JOHN. ( 1st Lt. i,2d Inf., July 28, '66. ) ( ist Lt. i,2d Inf, July 28, '66.) Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services iii the battle of Spottsylvania, Va. KELLOGG, EDGAR R. (2d Lt. 16M Inf.. April T, '62.) (Capt. i6th Inf., Feb. 16, '65.) Brevet Capt., December 31, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Murfreesboro, Tenn. Brevet Maj., September i, 1864, for gal- lant and meritorious services during the Atlanta campaign and at the battle of Tonesboro, Ga. KELLOGG, JOSIAH H. (Bvt. zd Lt. ist Drags., July i, '60.) (Capt. Ist Cav., May 20, '62.) Brevet Maj., July 3, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services in the Gettys- burg campaign. KELLOGG, LYMAN H. (Bvt. 2d Lt. 2d Inf., July t, '52.) (Capt. l%th Inf., May 14, '61 ) Brevet Maj., September I, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services during the Atlanta campaign, and at the battle of Jonesboro, Ga. KELLOGG, SANFORD C. (zd. Lt. iZth Inf., Feby. 23, '65.) [Capt. .) Brevet Capt., December 31, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Stone River, Tenn. Brevet Maj., September i, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services during the Atlanta campaign. KELLY, PATRICK. (Capt. 16th Inf., Oct. 26, '61.) (Capt. 16th Inf., Oct. 26, '61.) Brevet Maj., April 7, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Shiloh, Tenn. KELLY, WILLIAM. (Capt. &th Cav., July 28, '66.) (Capt Wi C'av., July 28, '66.) Brevet Maj., April 5, 1868, for gallantry in an engagement with a large band of Indians on Malheur River, Oregon, April 5, 1868. KELTON, JOHN C. (Bvt. 2dU. 6th Inf., July i, '51.) (A. A. G. (Lt.-CoL), Mar. 23, '66.) Brevet Lt. -Col., and Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for most valuable and arduous services both in the field and at Head-quarters. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for most valuable and arduous services during the war, both in the field and at Head-quarters. KEMBLE, JAMES R. (2d Lt. yi Cav., Aug: 5, '61.) (Capt. ^d Cav., Jan. 7, '66.) Brevet Capt., March 30, 1865, for meritorious and faithful services in the recruitment of the armies of the United States. KENASTON, HERBERT. (ist Lt. nth Inf., May 14, '6r.) (ist Lt. wth Inf., May 14, '61.) Brevet Capt , July 2, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the bat- tle of Gettysburg, Pa. KENDALL, FREDERICK A. (2dLt. ifith Inf., July 28, '66.) (\st Lt. 2'^th Inf., July i\,'(y].) Brevet ist Lt., and Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at Fort Harrison, Va. KENDALL, THEODORE. (2dLt. icfh Inf., May 12, '63.) (\st Lt. zzdinf, June 11, '64.) Brevet ist Lt., September 20, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Chickamauga, Ga. TO THE PRESENT TIME. 429 KENDALL, "WILLIAM. {£ns. 45M /n/., April — , '14.) (tst Lt. 4^tA Inf., Jan. i, '15.) Retained, in 1815, (in reorganization under act o£ March 3 of that year), as 2d Lt. 2d Infantry, with Brevet of ist Lt. from Januaiy i, 1815. KENDRICK, HENRY L. (,Bvt. id Lt. T.st Inf., July 1, '35.) [Prof Mil. Acad., Mar. 3, '57.) Brevet Maj., October 12, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct in defense of Puebia, Mex. KBNNBRLY, GEORGE H. [\st Lt. ir)th Inf., April 6, '13.) [A. Q. M. (Capt.), jfime 26, '46.) Retained, May, 1816 (in reorganization under act of March 3, 1815), as 2d Lt. 8th Infantry, with Brevet of 1st Lt. from May 17, 18:4 (the date of his appointment as ist Lt. 26th Inf.) KBNNINGTON, JAMBS. (2d Lt. nth Inf., Nov. 26, '62.) (Capt. \i,th Inf., Dec. 10, '73.) Brevet ist Lt., December 13, i86'?, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Fredericksburg, Va. Brevet Capt., March 13, 1865, for general good conduct in the field. KENSEL, GEORGE A. {Bvt. id Lt. 4rt Arty., July i, '57.) (Capt. 5M Arty., Oct 8, '62.)' Brevet Maj., September 20, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Chickamauga, Ga. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for meritorious services while serving as Chief of Artillery of the Departments of the Gulf and of Virginia nnd North Carolina, and for gallant conduct in action before Drury's Bluff, Va. KENT, JACOB P. ( zd Lt. id Inf., May 6, '61 . ) ( Capt. ^d Inf., Jan. 8, '64. ) Brevet Maj,, May 3, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Chancellorsville, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., May 12, 1864, for gallant and meri- torious services at the battle of Spottsylvania, Va. KBOGH, MYLES "W. (id Lt. ifh Cav., May 4, '66.) (Capt. -jth Cav., July 28, '66.) Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the bat- tle of Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meri- torious services in the battle of Dallas, Ga. KBRIN, JOSEPH. (zd Lt. 6th Cav., Oct. 26, '61.) (Capt. 6th Cav., Julyii, '66.) Brevet ist Lt., May 27, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the bat- tle of Hanover C. H., Va. Brevet Capt., April i, 1805, for gallant and meri- torious services at the battle of Five Forks, Va. KETCHUM, DANIEL. (2dLt. 2<,th Inf., J-Jy 6, 'I2.) (Capt. ztfh Inf., Sept. 30, '13.) Brevet Maj., July 25, 1814, for distinguished services and gallant conduct at the battle of Niagara. 430 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 KBTCHUM, WILLIAM S. (Bvt. 2dLt. 6th Inf., July i, '34.) (C"'- ^-^f^ M-< ^"^ 6, '64.) Brevet Col., February i, 1863, for meritorious services in Missouri in the line of the army. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meri- torious services during the war. Brevet Maj.-Gen,, March 13, 1865, for dili- gent, faithful and meritorious services in the War Department. KETELTAS, HENRY. (Capt. itfh Inf., Aug. 5, '61.) {Capt. \'^h Inf., Aug. 5, '61.) Brevet Maj., April 7, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Shiloh, Tenn. Brevet Lt.-Col., November 25, 1863, for gallant and^ meri- torious services at the battle of Chickamauga, Ga., and Mission Ridge, Tenn. KBYBS, ALEXANDER S. B. (2d Lt. 12th Inf., Feb. 23, '66.) (Capt. loth Cav., Dec. 6, '73.) Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. KBYBS, CHARLES W. (2d Lt. 44th Inf., July 28, '66.) (2d. Lt. 44th /nf, July 28, '66.) Brevet ist Lt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in action at Fort Butler, La. Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Spottsylvania C. H. Va. t^BYES, ERASMUS D. (Bvt. 2d. Lt. 2d Arty., July i, '32.) (Col. nth Inf, May 14, '61.) Brevet Brig.-Gen., May 31, 1862, for gallant and meritorious conduct at the battle of Fair Oaks, Va. KBYE3, HAMLIN W. (Capt. nth Inf., May 14, '61.) (Capt. 14th Inf., May' 14, '61.) Brevet Maj., May 5, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of the Wilderness, Va. KIDD, WILLIAM. (2d Lt. 2d Inf., Nov. 26, '61.) (2d Lt. 2d Inf., JVov. 26, '61.) Brevet ist Lt., June 27, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gaines's Mills, Va. Brevet Capt., August 30, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Bull Run (2d), Va. KIDDOO, JOSEPH B. (Lt.-Col. 4ZdInf., July 28, '66.) (Lt.-Col. 43,/ Inf, July 28, '66.) Brevet Col., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the assault on Petersburg, Va., June 15, 1864. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in action near Fair Oaks, Va., October 27, 1864. KtLBURN, CHARLES L. (Bvt. 2d Lt. 1st Arty., July i, '42.) (Asst. Coin.-Gen. Subs. (Col.), June 2g,'64.) Brevet ist Lt., September 23, 1846, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Monterey. Brevet Capt., February 23, 1847, for gallant and meritorious con- duct at Buena Vista. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. TO THE PRESENT TIME. 43 1 KILGOXTR, WILLIAM M. (Capt. i,ist Inf., July 28, '66.) ( Capt. i,\st Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the bat- tle of Mission Ridge, Tenn. Brevet Lt.-Co]., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Atlanta, Ga. Brevet Col., March 2, 1867 , for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Nashville, Tenn. KILPATRICK, JUDSON {■2d Inf., 1st Arty., May 6, '61.) {Capt. 1st Arty., Nw. 30, '64.) Brevet Maj., June 17, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Aldie, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., July 3, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Col., May 13, 1864, foi' gal- lant and meritorious services at the battle of Resaca, Ga. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services in the capture of Fayette- ville. N. C. Brevet Maj.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the campaign in the Carolinas. KILPATRICK, ROBERT L. ( Capt. i,2d Inf., July 28, '66.) ( Capt. 420' Inf., July 28, '66. ) Brevet Maj., March 2, i8()7, for gallantry at the battle of Port Republic, Va., June 9, 1862. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 2, 1867, for gallantry at the battle of Chancellorsville, Va. KIMBALL, B. A. {Capt. ^th Inf., Mar. 8, '47.) {Capt. <}th Inf., Mar. 8, '47.) Brevet Maj., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. KING, CORNELIUS L. (istLt. ntk Inf., May 14, '61.) {Capt 12th Inf., Feb. 19, '62.) Brevet Maj., August i, 1864, for gallant services at the battle of the Wilder- ness, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., August I, 1864, for gallant services at the battle of Spottsylvania, Va. KING, JOHN H. {2dLL 1st Inf., Dec. z, '37.) {Col. ()th Inf., July 30, '65.) Brevet Col., September 20, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Chickamaugua, Ga. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Ruff's Station, Va. Brevet Maj.- Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services in the field during the war. KING, RUFUS, Jr. {2d Lt Afh Arty. Aug. 5, '61.) {Capt. ifh Arty., April 4, '69.) Brevet Capt., June 30, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the bat- tle of White Oak Swamp, Va. Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for good conduct and gallant services during the war. KING, WILLIAM H. {2dLt. 10th Inf., Feb. 23, '66.) {1st Lt. 10th Inf., Mar. 14, '66.) Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the bat- tle of Fair Oaks, Va., in May, 1862. KING, WILLIAM R. {1st Lt Engrs., Jane 11, '6:i.) ' {Capt Engrs., Dec.2^,'6s-) Brevet Capt, December i, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services during the campaign of 1864 in North Carolina. Brevet Maj., April 9, 1865, for gal- lant conduct in the field. 432 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 KING, "WILLIAM S. {Asst. Surg., July 29, '37.) (Surg. (Lt.-Col.), June 26, '76.) Brevet Lt.-Col. and Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and merit- orious services during the war. KINGSBURY, CHARLES P. (zd Lt. Ordn., July i, '40.) (Lt.-Col. Ordn., Dec. 22, '66.) Brevet ist Lt., February 23, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Buena Vista. Brevet Lt.-Col., Brevet Col. and Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. KINGSBURY, GEORGB W. (2dLt. 43(//«/, May 31, '67.) [ut Lt. 12th Inf., July 3, '74.) Brevet ist Lt., May 31, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the bat- tle of the Wilderness, Va. KINGSBURY, JULIUS J. B. (id Lt. 2d Inf., July I, '23.) (Maj. (>th Inf., May],'if).) Brevet Maj , August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. KINNEY, ERNEST L. {2d Lt. 1st Cav., Jan. i, '65.) (ist Lt. 1st Cav., July i, '65.) Brevet ist Lt., April I, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Kive Forks, Va. Brevet Capt. and Brevet Maj., October 25, 1865, for meritorious services. KINNEY, NATHANIEL C. (\stLt. \%th Inf., May 14, '61.) (Capt. i8tA Inf., Nov. 25, '62.) Brevet Maj., December 31, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Murfreesboro, Tenn. Brevet Lt.-Col., October 25, 1865, for merit- orious services during the war. KINNEY, SAMUEL H. (2d Lt. 2d Arty., June 13, '64.) (\st Lt 2d Arty., Oct 6, '65.) Brevet ist Lt., April g, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services in action at Appomattox C H., Va. Brevet Capt., April 9, 1865, for gallant and merit- orious services. KINSMAN, JOHN H. (Asst. Surg., Mar. 30, '64.) (Asst Surg., Mar. 30, '64.) Brevet Capt., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. KINZIB, DAVID H. (2d Lt yth Arty., May 14, '61.) {Capt. <^th Arty., April 12, 71.) Brevet ist Lt., June 30, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of White Oak Swamp, Va. Brevet Capt., September 17, 1862, for gal- lant and meritorious services at the battle of Antietam, Md. Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for good conduct and gallant services during the war. KINZIE, ROBERT A. (Paymaster (Maj), May 2, '61.) (Paymaster (Maj.), May 2, '61.) Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. TO THE PRESENT TIME. 433 KIP, LAWRENCE. {2d Lt. i,th Arty., Jtme 30, '57.) [Capt. J,d Arty., Aug. 13, '66.) Brevet Capt., June 11, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Trevillian Station, Va. Brevet Maj., March 31, 1865, for gallant and merit- orious services in the cavalry campaign from Winchester to Petersburg, and at the battle of Dinwiddie C. H., Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., April i, 1865, for gal- lant and meritorious services at the battle of Five Forks, Va. KIRBY, BYRON. {2dLt. 6th Inf., Oct. 24, '61.) (ist Lt. 6th Inf., Feb. 23, '64.) Brevet ist Lt., December 31, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Murfreesboro, Teun. Brevet Capt. and Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for meritorious services during the war. KIRBY, DENNIS T. ( Capt y)th Inf., July 28, '66.) {Capt. 2,9th Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Chickasaw Bayou, Miss. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 2, 1867, for gallant and merit- orious services in the assault of Vicksburg, Miss. Brevet Col., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battles of Chickamauga, Mission Ridge, and River's Bridge. KIRBY, EDMUND. (Ens. ^h Inf., July 6, '12.) [Paymaster, Aug. 5, '24.) Brevet Lt.-Col., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Contreras and Churubusco. Brevet Col., September 13, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Chapultepec. KIRBY, REYNOLD M. {•i,d Lt. yl Arty., July 9, '13.) [A. A .G. [Major), April 29, '16.) Brevet ist Lt., August 15, 1814, for gallant conduct in defense of Fort Erie. Brevet Capt., September 17, 1814, for gallant and good conduct in the sortie from Fort Erie. KIRKHAM, RALPH W. {Bvt. 2d Lt. 2d Inf., July I, '42.) (Dep. Q. M. Gen. (Lt.-Col), July 29, '66.) Brevet ist Lt., August 20, 1847, f°r gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. Brevet Capt., September 13, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Chapultepec. Brevet Lt.-Col. and Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. Brevet Brig.- Gen., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services in the Quarter- master's Department during the war. KLINE, JACOB. (\st Lt. \6th Inf., Sept. 9, '61.) (Capt. 18th Inf., Sept. 30, '64.) Brevet Capt., April 7, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Shiloh, Tenn. Brevet Maj., September i, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services during the Atlanta campaign. KNAPP, ORSON C. (2d Lt. it,th Inf., Aug. 10, '63.) (Capt. T,T,d Inf., Aug. 24, '67.) Brevet 1st Lt., September 1, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Mission Ridge and during the Atlanta campaign. Brevet Capt., March 13, 1861;, for meritorious service at the battle of Mission Uidge, Tenn. 434 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 ENS ASS, CHARLES L. {1st Lt. i8M Inf., May 14, '61.) {Capt. l%th Inf., —, —, —■) Brevet Maj., December 31, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Murfreesboro, Tenn. KNICKERBOCKER, BOLIVAR. {Asst. Surg., Aug. 5, '61.) {Asst. Surg., Aug. 5, '61.) Brevet Capt. and Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the vrar. KNIGHT, JOHN H. [Capt. \%th Inf Feb. 19, '62.) (Capt. \%th Inf, Feb. 19, '62.) Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services connected with the organization of the volunteer armies of the United States during the war. KNO^WBR, EDWARD C. (2d Lt. i,lth Inf., July 28, '66.) (1st Lt. yd Art' y, Mar. 25, '67.) Brevet ist Lt. and Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in front of Petersburg, Va., July 18, 1864. KNOX, EDWARD B. (zd Lt. I2tk Inf., yu?ie 12, '65.) (1st Lt. 12th Inf., June 16, '67.) Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Hanover C. H., Va. Brevet Mai., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Spottsylvania C. H., Va. KNOX, KILBURN. (1st Lt. i^th Inf., May 14, '61. J (Capt. 22d Inf., May 14, '64.) Brevet Maj., July 22, 1864, for gallant and efficient services in the attack on Atlanta. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services. KOBBE, W^ILLIAM A., Jr. (2d Lt. i(>.) (ist Lt.yd Art'y, Feb. 2,'6t.) Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the bat- tle of Nashville, Tenn. Brevet Maj , March 2, 1867, for gallant and merit- orious services in the capture of Fort Blakely, Ala. KRA0SE, DAVID. ( 1st Lt. nth Inf., May 14, '61.) (Capt. \i,th Inf., July 31, '63.) Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. KRESS, JOHN A. (2d Lt. Ordn., Nov. 24, '63.) (Capt. Ordn. June 23, '74.) Brevet Capt., April 2, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the sieges of Richmond and Petersburg, Va. Brevet Maj , April 3, 1865, for gal- lant, meritorious and distinguished services as Chief of Ordnance to the 25th Army Corps, during the siege of, and final attack upon, Richmond, Va. KROUTINGER, ADOLPH W^. (2d Lt. 2d Inf , Oct. 24, '61.) (Capt. 2d Inf., April \i, '64.) Brevet Capt. May 3, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Chancellorsville, Va. Brevet Maj., July 2, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. TO THE PRESENT TIME. 435 KURTZ, JOHN D. [zdLt. Engrs., July i, '42.) (Lt.-Col. Engrs., Aug. 8, '66.) Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services in the Engineer Department. Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for meritorious services during the war. LACEY, FRANCIS E. {2.d Lt. 2d Inf., July 18, '62.) (Capt. 10th Inf., Aug. 8, '66.) Brevet Capt., July 2, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. I/AGNEL, JULIUS A. D. (Bvt. 2dLt. tfh Inf., July i, '21.) [Capt. Ordn., Nov. i, '36.) Brevet ist Lt., July i, 1831, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. LAIDLEY, THEODORE T. S. {Bvt. zd Lt. Ordn., July i, '42.) (Col. Ordn., April 14, '75.) Brevet Capt., April 18, 1847, foi" gallant and meritorious conduct at Cerro Gordo. Brevet Maj., October 12, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct in the defense of Puebla, Mex. Brevet Lt.-Col. and Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services in the Ordnance Department. LALLY, FOLLIOT T. (Capt. <)th Inf., Mar. 3, '47.) (Maj. <)th Inf., Mar. 3, '47.) Brevet Lt.-Col., for gallant and meritorious conduct in several affairs at Paso Ovejas, National Bridge, and Cerro Gordo, August 10, 12, and 15 1847. LAMBERT, LOUIS J. (\stLt. lyth Inf., July 28, '66.) (ist Lt \-]th Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet Capt, March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the bat- tle of Chickamauga, Ga. Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and merit- orious services in the battle of Chattanooga, Tenn. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Pocotaligo River, S.C. LAMOTTB, JOSEPH H. (Bvt. 2d Lt. Inf., July i, '27.) (Maj. ^h Inf., May i, '52.) Brevet Maj., September 23, 1846, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Monterey. LANCASTER, JAMES M. (2dLt. ylArty., June 17, '62.) (1st Lt -^d Arty., June 24, '64.) Brevet Capt., March 13, 1865, for good conduct and gallant services during the war. LANE, JOHN. (2dLt i8tA Inf., June i, '63.) (2d Lt \%th Inf., June i, '63.) Brevet ist Lt., September 19, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Chickamauga, Ga. LANE, JOSEPH. (Brg.-Gen. Vols., July i, '46.) (Brig Gen. Vols., July i, '46.) Brevet Maj.-Genl, U. S. A., October 9, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct in the battle of Huamantla. For particulars of this case see Narra- tive, chapter 10. 436 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 LANE, VriLLIAM B. i.Bvt. 2d. Li. Mtd. Rifles, June 28, '48.) (Maj. 3d Cav., Nov. 9, '66.) Brevet Maj., March 30, 1865, for meritorious and faithful services in the recruitment of the armies of the United States. Brevet Lt.-Col., November 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services in connection vfith the mustering out and the disbanding of the volunteer armies of the United States. LANGDON, LOOMIS L. (Bvt. 2d Lt. i^h Arty., July i, '54.) (Capt. 1st Arty., Aug. 28, '61.) Brevet Maj., February 20, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Olustee, Fla. Brevet Lt.-Col., September. 29, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services in the attack on Fort Gilmer, Va. LANGHAM, A. L. (Ens. Rifles, May. 3, '08.) (Maj. \oth Inf., Aug. 15, '13.) Retained, December, 1815, (in reorganization under act of March 3 of that year), as Capt. 7th Infantry, with Brevet of Maj. from August 15, 1813. LARNARD, CHARLES H.. (Bvt. 2dLt. A^h Inf., July I, '31.) {Caft. /^h Inf., Feb. 25, '41.) Brevet Maj., May 9, 1846, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Palo Alto and Resaca de la Palma. LARKED, BENJAMIN F. (Ens. 2lstlnf., Oct. i, '13.) (Paymaster-Gen. (Col.), July 20, '54.) Brevet Capt., August 15, 1814, for gallant conduct in defence of Fort Erie. LARNED, CHARLES T. (Paymaster (Ma/.), Aug. 30, '61.) (Paymaster (Maj.), Aug., 30, '6l.) Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious sevices during the vcar. LARRABEE, CHARLES. (2dLt. Lt. Drags., June 13, '08.) (AssH Ins. Gen. (Major), Nov. 9, '14.) Brevet Maj., August 9, 18 12, for gallant conduct in the battle of Brownstovm. LARRABEE, CHARLES F. (2dLt. -jth Inf., Feb. 23, '66.) (ist. Lt. -jth Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the bat- tle of Pleasant Hill, La. LATIMER, ALFRED E. (Bvt. 2dLt 4M Inf., July i, '53.) (Maj ifh Cav., June 25, '67.) Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services. LATTIMORE, WALTER O. ( \st Lt. \Oith Inf., Atig. 5, '61.) (Capt i^th Inf., Mar. 18, '65.) Brevet Capt., September i, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services during the Atlanta campaign, and at the Ijattle of Jonesboro, Ga. LATTB, CHARLES H. (Asst Surg., Nov. 30, '36.) (Asst Med. Purveyor (Lt.-Col.), June 26, '76.) Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. TO THE PRESENT TIME. 437 LAVAL, "WILLIAM. {Ens. 2d Inf., Dec. 12, '08.) [Capt. yl Inf., Feb. 15, '14.) Brevet Maj., November 7, 1814, for gallant conduct during the siege of New Orleans. LAWRENCE, JAMES K. \Capt. nth Inf., Aug. 5, '61.) (Capt. llt/t Inf., Aug. 5, '61.) Brevet Maj., December 13, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Fredericksburg, Va. LAWRENCE, SAMUEL B. (1st Lt. i6tk Inf., May 14, '6i.) (Capt. i6tA Inf., May 3, '62.) Brevet Capt, April 7, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Shiloh, Tenn. Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. LAWRENCE, WILLIAM. (zd Lt. ifh Inf., April 30, '01.) [Col. ith Inf., Aug. 20, '28.) Brevet Lt.-Col., September ij, 1814, for gallant conduct in the attack on Fort Bowyer. Brevet Col., September 15, 1824, for lo years' faithful service in one grade. LAWRENCE, WILLIAM H. {\st Lt. \afh Inf., May 14, '6i.) (Capt. nth Inf., Oct. 25, '61.) Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. LAWSON, GAINES. (Capt. y^h Inf., July 28, '66.) (Capt. 2tfh Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, and Brevet Lt.-Col., March 2, 1867, for faithful and meritorious services. LAWSON, THOMAS. (Gar. Surg. Mate., Feb. 8, '11.) (Surg.-Gen. (Col.), Nmj. 30, '36.) Brevet Brig.-Gen., May 30, 1848, for meritorious conduct in the Mexican war. LAY, GEORGE W^. (Bvt. 2d Lt. 6th Inf., July i, '42.) (Capt. 6th Inf., Dec. 24, '56.) Brevet ist Lt., September 23, 1846, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Monterey. Brevet Capt., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Contreras and Churubusco. LAY, RICHARD G. (2d Lt. 2,d Inf., June 20, '59.) (Capt. yl Inf., Mar. 12, '62.) Brevet Maj., July 2, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and merit- orious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. LAYTON, CALEB R. (Capt. nth Inf., Aug. 5, '61.) (Capt. 16th Inf., Aug. 5, '6i.) Brevet Maj., July 2, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. 438 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM 1 8 12 LAZELLE, HENRY M. (Bvt. 2d Lt. 1st Inf., July i, '55.) [Maj. \st Inf., Dec. 15, '74. ) Brevet Maj, September 19, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services in action near Culpepper, Va. LEACH, JOSEPH. (Ens. -jih Inf., Sept. 16. '14.) (■^d Lt. ytk Inf., Sept. 16, '14.) Brevet 2d Lt., December 23, 1814, for gallant conduct at siege of New Orleans, La. LEAHY, MICHAEL. IfidLt. xst Arty., Oct. 31, 'di-) {ist Lt. \?,th Inf., Oct.. 14, ,'64.) Brevet ist Lt., February 20th, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Olustee, Fla. Brevet Capt., October 7th, 1864, for gal- lant and meritorious services in action on the Darbytown Road, near Rich- mond, Va. LEAR, CLINTON "W. [2d Lt. tfh Inf., Mar. 3, '47.) [ist Lt. efh Inf., April 30, '49.) Brevet ist Lt, August 15th, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Paso Ovejas, National Bridge, and Cerro Gordo. LEAR, WILLIAM W. (2dLt. Afh Inf., Feb. 13, '18.) (Maj. ^d Inf., June nth, '42.) Brevet Maj., May ist, 1834, for ten years' faithful service in one grade. LEAVENWORTH, HENRY. [Capt. 2^th Inf., April 2^, '12.) {Col. yl Inf., Dec. 16, '25.) Brevet Lt-Col., July 15th, 1814, for distinguished and meritorious services at the battle of Chippewa. Brevet Col., July 25, 1814, for distinguished ser- vices at Niagara Falls. Brevet Brig.-Gen., July 25, 1824, for ten years' faithful service in one grade. LEAVY, JAMES T. (2d Lt. -jth Cav., Jan. 22, '67.) (\st Lt. yth Cav., July 31, '67.) Brevet 1st Lt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service in the battle of Shiloh, Tenn. Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and merito- rious service in the capture of Savannah, Ga. LE CONTE, JOHN. (Asst. Top. Engr. (Capt.), Apl. 18, '18.) (Asst. Top. Engr. ( Capt. ), Apl. 18, '18.) Brevet Maj., April 18, 1828, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. LEE, ARTHUR T. (2dLt. tfh Inf., Oct. 8, '38.) (Maj. 2d Inf., Oct. 26, '61.) Brevet Lt.-Col., July 2, 1863, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. LEE, CHARLES C. (Asst. Surg., Nov. 22, '62.) (Asst. Surg.. Nov. 22, '62.) Brevet Capt. and Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious service during the war. LEE, DANIEL S. (1st Lt. iitA Inf., Feb. 24, '47.) (ist Lt. nth Inf., Feb. 24, '47.) Brevet Capt., August 20, 1847, ^°'^ gallant and meritorious conduct in battles of Contreras and Churubusco. TO THE PRESENT TIME. 439 LEE, FRANCIS. {2d Lt. Jth Inf., July 1st, '22.) ( Col. 2d Inf., Oct. 18, '55.) Brevet Lt.-Col., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Contreras and Churubusco. Brevet Col., Sept. 8, 1847, for gallant and meri- torious conduct at Molino del Ray. LEE, GEORGE. (irf Lt. 2 ut Inf., July 28, '66.) ( \st Lt. 2\st Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallantry at battles of New Madrid, Boone- ville, and Perrysville. Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallantry at battles of Stone River and Chickamauga. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 2, 1867, for faithful service in the field during the war. LEE, JAMES G. C. (A. Q. M. (Capt), July 2, '64.) (A. Q. M.{Capt.), July 2, '64.) Brevet Maj. and Lt.-Col., July 31, 1865, for faithful and meritorious service during the war. LEE, JOHN. [zd Lt.ifh Cav., July 17, '62.) (Capt. 4/A Cav., July 31, '67.) Brevet Capt., April 2, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service at the cap- ture of Selma, Ala. LEE, JOHN P. (Bvt. zd Lt. 1st Arty., July I, '34.) (J. A. of the Army (Bvt. Maj.), Mar. 2, '49.) Brevet Capt., Jan. 27, 1837, for gallant and good conduct in the war against the Florida Indians. LEE, RICHARD B. (■^d Lt. of Arty., July 17, '17.} (Com. of Sub. (Maj.), Nov. 30, '41.) Brevet Capt., Oqt. 31, 1829, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade,,, Brevet Maj., June 9, 1836, for gallant and good conduct in the affair of Mican- opy, Fla. LEE, RICHARD H. (Ens. 36M Inf., April 30, '13.) (\st Lt. of Arty., April 20, '18.) Brevet 2d Lt., August 15, 1814, for gallant conduct in defense of Fort Erie. Brevet ist Lt., September 17, 1814, for gallant conduct in sortie from Fort Erie. LEE, ROBERT E. (Bvt. 2d Lt. Engrs., July i,'2g.) (Col. 1st Cav., Mar. 16, '61.) Brevet Maj., April 18, 1847, f°'' gallant and meritorious conduct at Cerro Gordo. Brevet Lt.-Col., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Contreras and Churubusco. Brevet Col., September 13, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Chapultepec. LEE, SAMUEL P. (Capt. 45M Inf., July 28, '66.) (Capt. 4$tA Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service in the battle of Fredericksburg, Va. Brevet Lt..-Col., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service in the battle of Gettysburg, Va. LEEPE, JOHN G. (2d Lt. ir^th Inf., May :i, '66.) (ist Lt. i^th Inf., Nov. 18, '67.) Brevet ist Lt, March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service in the battle of Opequan. Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service in the battle of Fishers' Hill, Va. 44° BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 LBET, GEORGE K. (A.Q.M. (Capt.), Mar. 23, '66.) {A. A. Gen. (Maj.), Mar. 23, 66.) Brevet Lt-CoL, March 2, 1867, for faithful and meritorious service during the war. LEGATE, THOMAS C. (20? Lt. ^d Arty., April 30, '12.) (Capt. 2(1 Arty., May 13, '20.) Brevet Maj., May 13, 1830, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. LEGGETT, HENRY F. (id Lt. i%th Inf., July 17, '67.) (\st Lt. 2^h Inf., Sept. 14, '72.) Brevet ist Lt., July 17, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service in the battle of Mission Ridge, Tenn. Brevet Capt., July 17, 1867, for gallant and meritor- ious service in the battle of Peach Tree Creek, Ga. LEIB, ED-WARD H. {2.d Lt. ith Cav., April 26, '61.) (Capt. ^h Cav., April 13, '63.) Brevet Capt., June 13, 1862, for gallant and meritorious service in the cavalry action at Old Church, Va. Brevet Major, April i, 1865, for gallant and meri- torious services at the battle of Five Forks, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col. April i, '65, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. LEIGH, JOHN W. {1st Lt. Voltigeurs, Feb. 25, '47.) {ist Lt. Voltigeurs, Feb. 25, '47.) Brevet Capt., for gallant and meritorious conduct in several affairs with guerilleros at PasoOvejas, National Bridge, and Cerro Gordo, on the loth, I2th and 15th August, 1847. LEWES, JOHN R. (Maj. 44tk Inf., Jan. 22, '67.) (Maj. 44M Inf., Jan. 22, '67.) Brevet Lt-Col., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service in the battle of White Oak Swamp, Va. Brevet Col., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service in'the battle of the Wilderness, Va. LENDRUM, JOHN H. (2d Lt. 2d Arty., Mar. 8, '47.) (Capt. T,d Arty., Dec. 3, '58.) Brevet Capt., Sept. 13, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Cha- pultepec. LEONARD, HIRAM. (Add. P. M., Nov. 24, '46.) (Dep. P. M. Gen. (Li.-Col.), Sept. 6, '62.) Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious service during the war. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious service in the Pay Department during the war. LEONARD, JOHN. (\st Lt. 43(/ Inf., July 28, '66.) (\st Lt. i,yl Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious conduct in the battle of Frederickburg, Va. Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service in the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. LESLIE, THOMAS J. (Bvt. 2d Lt. Engrs., Mar. 4, '15.) (Paymaster (Maj.), July 7, '38.) Brevet Capt., March 31, 1829, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. Brevet Lt.-Col., Brevet Col., and Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for faith- ful and meritorious performance of duty in the Pay Department during (o years' service. TO THE PRESENT TIME. 441 I>E5T£R, CHARLES H. {idLt. ziiCav., June ii, '63.) {Capt. Mt Cav., July 28, '66.) Brevet ist Lt., May 6, 1864, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Todd's Tavern, Va. Brevet Capt., July 27, 1864, for gallant and meritorious service in action at Deep Bottom, Va. LEWIS, WILLIAM H. (Bvt. 2d Lt. ifh Inf., July i, '49.) (Lt -Col. \^k Inf., Dec. 10, '73.) Brevet Maj., March 28. 1862, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Apache Canon, N. M. Brevet Lt.-Col., April 15, 1862, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Peralta, New Mexico. LIEBER, GTJIDO N. [\st Lt. wth Inf., May 14, '61.) [Juage Advocate {Maj.), Nov. 13, '62.) Brevet Capt., June 27, 1862, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Gaines's Mills, Va. Brevet Maj., May 28, 1864, for gallant and meritorious ser- vices during the Red River Campaign. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious service during the war. LINCOLN, ABRAM B. (Bvt. 2d Lt. 1st Inf., July i, '45.) (ist Lt. ifh Inf., Nov. 24, '47 ) Brevet ist Lt., September 8, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct in the battle of Molino del Rey, Mexico. LINCOLN, GEORGE. (2d Lt. ifh Inf., Sept. 14, '37.) (Capt. %th Inf., Feb. — , '47.) Brevet Capt., May 9, 1846, for gallant conduct in battles of Palo Alto and Resaca de la Palma. LINDSAY, WILLIAM. (Maj. of Arty., May 14, '12.) (Col. 2d Arty., April 26, '32.) Brevet Col., March 12, 1823, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. LINDSLEY, WEBSTER. (Asst. Surg. May 2S, '60.) (Asst.Surg. May 28, '60.) Brevet Capt. and Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faitliful and meritorious service during the war. LINNARD, THOMAS B. (Bvt. 2dLt. 2d Arty., July 1, '30.) (Capt. Top. Engrs., Mar. 31, '42.) Brevet Capt., September 30, 1836, for gallant conduct, activity, and enter- prise in the war against the Florida Indians. Brevet Maj., February 23, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct in the battle of Buena Vista. LINNARD, W^ILLIAM. (Dep. Q. M. Gen., April 3, '12.) (Q. M. Gen. (Col.), April 12, '13.)* Brevet Lt.-Col., June 15, 1825, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. (•Retained in reorganization of 1815 as Dep. Qr. Mr. Gen. with rank of Major.) LISCUM, EMERSON H. (2d Lt. 12th Inf., Feb. 19, '63.) (Capt. 19M Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet Capt., August i, 1864, for gallant service at the battle of Bethesda Church, and during campaign before Richmond, Va. 20 442 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 » LITCHFIELD, HENRY G. {2d Li. iSiA Inf., July 14, '62.) ( Capt. 2d Arty. Sept. 21, '(A.) Brevet Capt., September 20, 7?63, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Chickamauga, Ga. Brevet Maj., September i, 1864, for gallant and meritorious service during the Atlanta Campaign, and at the battle of Jonesboro, Ga. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Bentonville, N. C. LITTLE, HENRY. {zdLt. ifh Inf., July i, '39.) {Capt. -jth Inf., Aug. 20, '47.) Brevet Capt,, September 23, 1846, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Monterey. LITTLE, THOMAS. (zd Lt. \-^h Inf., May 31, '62.) {Capt. loth Cav., Nov. i, '67.) Brevet Capt., July 4, 1863, for gallant and meritorious service during the siege of Vicksburg, Miss. Brevet Maj., November 25, 1863, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Mission Ridge, Tenn. LIVINGSTON, JOHN P. (zd Lt. zyl Inf., Sept. 25, '12.) {Capt. 6th Inf., Aug. 18, '19.) Brevet Capt., July 25, 1814, for gallant conduct at the battle of Niagara. LIVINGSTON, LA RHETT L. (Bvt. zdLt. utArty., July i, '53.) {Capt. ^d Arty., Oct. 26, '61.) Brevet Maj., July i, 1862, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Malvern Hill, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., August 28,1864, for gallant and merito- rious service at the battle of Smithfield, Va. LIVINGSTON, MANNING. (zd Lt. 3d Arty., Feb. 19, '62.) (zd Lt. T^d Arty., Feb. 19, '62.) Brevet ist Lt. and Brevet Capt., July 2, 1863, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa., where he was killed. V'^ LOCKE, JOSEPH M. (Capt. 14th Inf., Sept. 19, '61.) (Capt. 14th Inf., Sept. 19, '61.) Brevet Maj., August 30, 1862, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Bull Run (2d), Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., July 2, 1863, for gallant and meri- torious conduct at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. LODOR, RICHARD. (Bvt. zd Lt. 4th Arty., July i, 't,6.) (Capt. 4th Arty., Nov. 29, '61.) Brevet Maj., December 31, 1862, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Stone River, Tenn. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service during the war. Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service during the war. LOGAN, THOMAS H. (1st Lt. 40th Inf., July 28, '66.) ( ist Lt. t,fh Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service in the bat- tle of Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service in the battle of the Wilderness, Va. TO THE PRESENT TIME. 443 LOMAX, MANN F. (2d Lt. Arty., June 10, ^OT .) . (Maj. of Ordn., July-],''^^ Brevet Maj., Nov. 17, 1824, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. LONG, ANDREW K. (2d Lt. 6th Inf., Nffv. 20, '65.) (Com. of Subs. (Capt.), Feb. 25, '67.) Brevet Maj. and Brevet Lt.-Col., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service during the v^ar. LONG, ELI. (zd Lt. 1st Cav., June 27, '56.) (Capt. 1st Cav., May 24, '6l.) Brevet Maj , October 7, 1862, for gallant and meritorious service at the bat- tle of Farmington, Tenn. Brevet Lt.-Col., December 3, 1863, for gallant and meritorious service during the defence of Knoxville, Tenn. Brevet Col., August 21, 1864, for gallant and meritorious service at battle of Lovejoy's Station, Ga. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle and capture of Selma, Ala. Brevet Maj.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service in the field during the war. LONG, JAMES VT. (2d Lt. 2d Inf., Aug. 5, '61.) (Capt. 2d Inf., Feb. 9, '63.) Brevet Capt., June 27, 1862, for gallant and meritorious service at the bat- tle of Gaines's Mills, Va. Brevet Maj., May 5, 1864, for gallant and merit- orious service at the battle of the Wilderness, Va. LONG, STEPHBilNr A. (2d Lt. Engrs., Dec. 12, '14.) (Maj. Top. Engrs., July 7, '38.) Brevet Lt.-Col., April 29, 1826, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. LONG, WALTER S. (2dLt. 40th Inf., July 28, '66.) (1st Lt. i,oth Inf., July 31, '67.) Brevet ist Lt. and Brevet Capt, March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service in the battle of Antietam, Md. LONGSTREET, JAMES. (Bvt. 2d Lt. ifh Inf., July i, '42.) (Paymaster (Maj.), July 19, '58.) Brevet Capt., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. Brevet Maj., September 8, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Molino del Rey. LOOMIS, GUSTAVtTS. (2d Lt. of Arty., Mar. I, 'll.) (Col. ^th Inf., Mar. 9, '51.) Brevet Maj., April 7, 1829, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for long and faithful service in the army. LOOSLEir, DALIEN. (2d Lt. nth Inf., Nov. 20, '61.) (Capt ntk Inf., May 31, '66.) Brevet Capt., September 17, 1862, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Antietam, Md. LORAIN, LORENZO. (2dLt. yl Arty., July I, '56.) (Capt. yi Arty., Feb. 28, '62.) Brevet Capt., July 18, 1861, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Blackburn's Ford, Va. Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for good conduct and gallant service during the war. 444 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 I.ORD, JAMBS H. {Bvt. idtt. -id Arty., June 17, '62.) i,Acst. Qr. Mr. [Capt.], April 24, '75.) Brevet ist Lt., July i, 1862, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Malvern Hill, Va. Brevet Capt., September 17, 1862, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Antietam, Md. Brevet JWaj., April 9, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service in action at Appomattox Court House, Va. LORD, RICHARD S. C. (Bvt. id Lt. -jth Inf., July i, '56.) (,Capt. 1st Cav., Oct. 26, '6l.) Brevet Maj., July 7, 1863, for gallant and meritorious service during the Gettysburg campaign. Brevet Lt.-Col., April 1, 1865, for gallant and merit- orious service at the battle of Five Forks, Va. LORD, THOMAS "W. {2d Lt. 43(f Inf., July 28, '66.) (xst Lt. zoth Inf., Oct. 1, '71.) Brevet ist Lt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service in the battle of Chancellorsville, Va. LQRING, ALONZO. (2d Lt. nth Inf., Mar. 8, '47.) (ist Lt. nth Inf., Dec. — , '47.) Brevet 1st Lt, for gallant and meritorious conduct in several affairs with Guerilleros at Paso Ovejas, National Bridge and Cerro Gordo on the loth, I2th, and 15th of August, 1847. LORING, HENRY H. (2d Lt. 6th Inf., July 24, '18.) (Capt. zd Inf., July 15, '31.) Brevet Capt., October 17, 1830, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. LORING, "WILLIAM W. (Capt. Mtd. Rifles, May 27, '46.) (Col. Mtd. Rifles, Dec. 30, '56.) Brevet Lt.-Col , August 20, 1847, ^°"'- gallant and meritorious conduct at Contreras and Churubusco. Brevet Col., September 13, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Chapultepec. LOTHROP, "WARREN L. (2d Lt. ifh Arty., Feb. 21, '57.) (Asst. Qr. Mr. (Capt), Aug. 3, '61.) Brevet Maj., March 14, 1862, for gallant and meritorious service in actional New Madrid, Mo. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and merito- rious service during the war. LOUD, JOHN S. (2d Lt. ^h Cav., Jan. 22, '67.) (ist Lt. <)th Cav., July 31, '67.) Brevet ist Lt. and Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for meritorious service dur- ing the war. LOVE, GEORGE M. (2dLt. nth Inf., Mar. 7, '67.) (1st Lt. 16th Inf., Mar. i, '75.) Brevet ist Lt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service in action at Plains' Store. Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant andjmeritorious service in the assault on Port Hudson, La. Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service in battle of Cedar Creek, Va. .; TO THE PRESENT TIME. 445 LOVE, JOHN. {Bvt 2(/ Lt. Drags., July i, '41.) (1st Lt. \st Drags., June 30, '46.) Brevet Capt, March 16, 184S, for gallant and meritorious conduct in the battle of San Cruz de Resales, Mexicp. LOVEIiL, CHARIiSS S. (2dLt. (>th Inf., Oct. 13, '37.) (Col. l^th Inf., Feb. 16, '65.) Brevet Lt.-Col., June 27, 1862, for gallant and meritorious service at the bat- tle of Gaines's Mills, Va. Brevet Col., July i, 1862, for gallant and merit- orious service at battle of Malvern Hill, Va. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant services at the battle of Antietam, Md. LOVELL, CHRISTOPHER S (zdLt. id Inf., July-ii, '38.) (Maj. yi Inf., Nm. 23, '61.) Brevet Capt., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. LOVELL, MANSFIELD. (id Lt. ifh Arty., July i, '42.) (\st ht. ifh Arty., Feb. 16, '47.) Brevet Capt., September 13, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Chapultepec. LOVTD, ALLEN. (yi Lt. of Arty., May i, '14.) (Capt. 2.d Arty., New. 30, '36.) Brevet Capt., April 20, 1828, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. Brevet Maj., May 9, 1846, for gallant conduct in defence of Fort Brown. LO'WE, WILLIAM R. (2d Lt. jgtA Inf., Nov. 20, '61.) [Caft. igth Inf., Sept. 19, '65.) Brevet Capt., September i, 1864, for gallant and meritorious service during the Atlanta Campaign and at the battle of Jonesboro, Ga. Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for long and meritorious service. LOWE, "WILLIAM W. (Bvt. 2d Lt. of Drags., July i, '53.) (Maj. 6th Cav., July 31, '66.) Brevet Maj , Oclober 9, 1863, for gallant and meritorious service in the Cavalry engagement near Chickamauga, Ga. Brevet Lt.-Col., December 15, 1863, for gallant and meritorious service in the cavalry action near Huntsville, Ala. Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service during the war. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious ser- vice in the field during the war. LOWRY, ALBERT. (2d Lt. 2d Drags., Oct. 19, '39.) (A. Q. M. (Capt.), Mar. 10, '47.) Brevet Maj., March 25, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct in affair at Medelin. LTTDINGTON, ELISHA H. (Capt. lytA Inf., Aug. 5, '61.) (Asst. Ins. Gen. (Maj.), April 20, '64.) Brevet Maj., July 2, 1863, for gallant and meritorious service at battle of Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for meritorious service during the war. Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious service in his department. 446 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 LUDINGTON, M. I. {Q. M. (Maj.), Jan. 18, '67.) (C- M- Wth Inf., July 14, '63.) Brevet Capt., July 2, 1863, for gallant and meritorious servic? at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. LYON, ELIJAH. (31/ Lt. Lt. Arty., May 20, '13. ) (Capt. 2d Arty., Feb. 20, '27.) Brevet Capt., January i, 1827, for to years' faithful service in one grade. LYON, NATHANIEL. (2d Lt. zd Inf., July i, '41.) (Caft. 2d Inf., June 11, '51.) Brevet Capt., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. LYSTBR, -WILLIAM J. (\st Lt. \c)th Inf., May 14, '61.) (Capt. igtk Inf., Aug. 9, '64.) Brevet Capt., April 7, 1862, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Shiloh, Tenn. Brevet Maj., September 20, 1863, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Chickamauga, Ga Brevet Lt.-Col., September i, 1864, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Mission Ridge, Tenn., and during the Atlanta Campaign. Mac CONNELL, CHAKLES C. (2d Lt. ith Arty., May 14. '61.) (Capt. c^A Arty., May 14, '75.) Brevet ist Lt., June 27, 1862, for gallant and meritorious service in the Peninsula campaign in Va. Brevet Capt., July 2, 1863, for gallant and merit- orious service at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet JMaj., March 25, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service during the rebel attack on Fort Stedman, Va. MACFEELY, ROBERT. (Bvt. zd Lt. i^h Inf., July I, '50.) (Com.-Gen. of Subs. (Brig.-Cen.), Apl. 14, '75.) Brevet Lt.-Col., and Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and merit- orious service during the war. MACHESNEY, JOHN. (\st Lt. 6th Inf., May 3, 'oS.) (Maf dth Inf., Mar. 21, '14.) Retained, M.iy i3ii; (in reorganization under, act of March 3, 1815), as Capt. 7th Inf., with brevet of Maj., from March 21, 1814. MACKAY, AENEAS. (Asst. Dep. Com. Ordn., Mar. 12, '13.) (Dep. Q. M. Gen. (Lt.-Col.) Apl. 21, '46.) Retained, May, 1816 (in reorganization under Act of March 3, 1815), as 2d Lt. of Artillery, with Brevet of ist Lt., from March 12, 1813. Brevet Maj., December 31, 1832, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. Brevet Col., May 30, 1848, for meritorious conduct, particularly in performing his duties in prosecuting war with Mexico. MACK OSCAR A. (Bvt. zd Lt. T,d Arty., July r, '50.) (Lt.-Col. zist Inf., Dec. 15, '74.) Brevet Maj., September 10, l86i, for gallant service at the battle of Carnifex Ferry, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., December 31, 1862, for gallant and distinguished service at the battle of Murfreesboro, Tenn. Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service during the war. 448 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 MACKALL, ■Wm. AW. (idLt. 1st Arty., July i, '37.) (^- ^- ^- '^^'"- ^«/)' ^«*"- S. '53-) Brevet Capt., September 23, 1846, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Monterev. Brevet Maj., August 20, r847, for gallant and meritorious con- duct at Contreras and Churubusco. MACKENZIE, ALEXANDER. {1st Lt. £ngrs., June 13, '64.) (Caft. Engrs., Mar. 7, '67.) Brevet Capt., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. MACKENZIE, RANALD S. (id Lt. Engrs, June 17, '62.) (Col. Afh Cav., Mar. 6, '67.) Brevet ist Lt., August 28, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Manassas, Va. Brevet Capt., May 3, 1863, for gallant and meritori- ous services at the battle of Chancellorsville, Pa. Brevet Maj., July 4, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Lt.-Col., June 18, 1864, for gallantand meritorious service before Petersburg, Va. Brevet Co)., Oct. ig, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at battle of Cedar Creek, Va. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and merit- orious services in the field during the war. MACKEY, JOHN T. (2d Lt. l6th Inf., June i, '63.) (Caft. i^th Inf., Sept. 21, '67.) Brevet ist Lt., September 19, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Chickamauga, Ga. MAC IVrURRAY, JUNIUS W. (2d Lt. 1st Arty., Feb. 23, '66.) (1st I.t. 1st Arty., Mar. 20, '66.) Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service in the siege of Corinth, Miss. Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the siegf. of Vicksburg, Miss. MACOMB, ALEXANDER. (Cornet Cav., Jan. 10, '99.) (Maj.-Gen., and Gen.-in-Chief, May 24, '28.) Brevet Maj.-Gen , Septemljer it, 1814, for distinguished and gallant conduct in defeating the enemy at Plattsburg. MACOMB, JOHN N. (Bvt. 2d Lt. i,th Arty., July 1, '32.) (Col. of Engrs., Mar. 7, '67.) Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. MACRAE, NATHANIEL C. (Bvt 2d Lt. 1st Inf, July i, '26.) (Maj. ^d Inf., May 31, '57.) Brevet Lt.-Col. and Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for long and faithful ser- vice. MACRAE, -WILLIAM. (Caft. Arty, and Engis , June 1, '98.) (Lt.-Col. Arty., April 19, '14.) Brevet Lt.-Co) , July 10, 1812. No record for what service. Brevet Col, April 19, 1824, (or 10 years' faithful service in one grade. TO THE PRESENT TIME. 449 MADDEN, DANIEL. (2d Lt. dth Cav., A'ov. i, '6l.) [Capt. dth Cav., May 10, '67.) Brevet ist Lt., June 9, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Beverley Ford, Va. Brevet Capt., April 9, 1865, for gallant and merit- orious services in the campaign terminating with the surrender of Gen. Lee's army. MADIGAN, JOHN. {2.d Lt. \st Cav., Feb. 23, '66.) (\st Lt. 1st Cav., April 25, '67.) Brevet Capt., September 27, 1867, for conspicuous gallantry in charging a large band of Indians, strongly fortified in the Infernal Caverns, Pitt River, Cal., Vfhere killed. MAGBE, MATTHEW J. (Capt. ifh Rifles, Mar. 17, '14.) {.Capt. i^h Rifles, Mar. 17, '14.) Retained January, 1816 (in re-organization under Act of March 3, 1815), as 1st Lt. of Ordnance, with brevet of Capt., from March 17, 1814. MAGILTON, ALBERT L. {Bvt. 2d Lt. 4h Arty., July i, '46.) {Capt. ifh Arty., June 10, '57.) Brevet ist Lt., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. MAGNITZKY, GTJSTAVE. % (2d Lt. y)th Inf., Mar. 7, '67.) (2d Lt. yjth Inf., Mar. 7, '67.) Brevet ist Lt., March 7, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Gettysburg, Pa: Brevet Capt., March 7, 1867, for gallant and merit- orious services in the battle of Petersburg, Va. MAGRUDBR, DAVID L. (Asst. Surg., Feb. 1, '50.) (Surgeon (Maj.), April 16, '62.) Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. MAGRUDER, JOHN B. (Bvt. 2d Lt. yth Inf., July i, '30.) (Capt. 1st Arty., June 18, '46.) Brevet Maj., April 18, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Cerro Gordo. Brevet Lt.-Col., September 13, 1847, for gallant and meritorious con- duct at Chapultepec. MAHNKEN, JOHN H. (\st Lt. Zth Cav., Aug. 7, '67.) (1st Lt. %th Cav., Aug. 7, '67.) Brevet Capt., August 7, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service in the battle of Cedar Creek, Va. Brevet Maj., August 7, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Five Forks, Va. MAHON, STEPHEN K. (2d Lt. iitk Inf., Feb. 23, '66.) (1st Lt. idth Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet Capt, March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the defence of Helena, Ark. MAITLAND, "WM. S. (2d Lt. 2d Inf., July 1, '20.) (1st Lt. jd Arty., Dec. 31, '28. ) Brevet Capt.. December 31, 1835, for gallant and meritorious conduct in the affair of the Withlacoochee and Welika, Fla. 20* 450 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM 1 8 12 MAIZE, W. R. [,zdLt. 2d In/, April zz, '66) (ist Lt. 20tk Inf., Jan. 22, '67.) Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious conduct in the battle of Stone River, Tenn. MALE, "WILLIAM H. (irf Lt. -idth Inf., July 28, '66.) [\st. Lt. ■^fitk Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. MALBY, THOMAS E. (zdLt. tfh Cav., April 14, '62.) (Capt. tfh Cav., July 28, '66.) Brevet ist Lt., June 27, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gaines's Mills, Va. Brevet Capt., September 17, 1862, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Antietam, Md. Brevet Maj., July 28, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Deep Bottom, Va. MALLERY, G-ARRICE. ( Capt. 43d Inf., July 28, '66.) ( Capt. 1st Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in a skirmish at Garnett's Farm. Brevet Lt.-Col, March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service in the battle of Peach Orchard, Va. MALLORY, HENRY S. (Ens. \-]th Inf., Dec. 12, '14.) (Capt. zd Arty., Dec. 31, '36.) Brevet Capt., May 31, 1829, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. MALLOY, ADAM G. (zdLt. lyth Inf., Feb. 23, '66.) (\st Lt. lytk Inf., Feb. 23, '(,(,,) Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service in the siege of Vicksburg, Miss. Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Kenesaw Mountain, Ga. Brevet Lt-Col., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service in the battle of Atlanta, Ga. Brevet Col., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service in the battle of Nash- ville, Tenn. MALONEY, MAURICE. (zdLt. tfh Inf., Nov. 27, '46.) (Lt.-Col. i6th Inf., June 21, '67.) Brevet ist Lt., September 8, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Molino del Key. Brevet Capt., September 13, 1847, ^""^ gallant and meritorious conduct at Chapultepec. Brevet Lieut.-Col., July 4, 1863, for gallant and meritorious service during the siege of Vicksburg. Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. MANSFIELD, JOSEPH E. F. (Bvt. zd Lt. Engrs., July i, '22.) \Brig.-Gen., May 14, '61.) Brevet Maj., May 9, 1846, for gallant and distinguished service in defence of Fort Brown. Brevet Lt.-Col., September 23, 1846, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Monterey. Brevet Col.. February 23, 1847, for gallant and merit- orious conduct at the battle of Biiena Vista. Brevet Brig.-Geu., May 6, i86l. No service specified. MANSFIELD, SAMUEL M. (zdlJ. Engrs., June 17, '62.) [Maj. Engrs.. Sept 2, '74.) Brevet Capt., June 14, 1863, for gallant and meritorious service in action at Port Hudson, La. Brevet Maj. and Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for gal- lant and meritorious service during the war. TO THE PRESENT TIME. 451 MANY, J A -VIES B. [Li. Arty, and Engrs. ), June 4, '98.) [Col. ^d Inf., July 21, '34.) Brevet Col., June i, 1831, for 10 years' faithtul service in one grade. MARCOTTE, HENRY. (2^ Lt. 4iiA Inf., July 28, '65.) (1st Lt. i-jth Inf., June 5, '67.) Brevet 1st Lt. and Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service in the battle of Chancellorsville, Va. MARCY, RANDOLPH B. (Bvt. 2d Lt. tfk Inf., July 1, '32.) (Insp.-Gen. [Col.), Aug. 9, '61.) Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service in the field during the war. Brevet Maj.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for faithful and merit- orious service during the war. MARKLEY, JOHN H. {,2dLt. 2d Inf., Nov. 26, '61.) (ist Li. 2d Inf., Jm. 8, '63.) Brevet ist Lt., June 27, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gaines's Mills, Va. Brevet Capt., August 30, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Bull Run (2d), Va. MARSH, ELIAS J. (Asst. Surg., Aug. 5, '61.} (Assi. Surg, Aug. 5, '6t.) Brevet Capt. and Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. MARSH, SALEM S. (Bvt. 2d Li. ^ih Inf., July i, '60.) {Cafii. 2d Inf., Nov. 12, '61.) Brevet Maj., December 13, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Fredericksburg, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., May 3, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Chancellorsville, Va. MARSHALL, ED"WARD C. {\st Lt. \tfh Inf., April 9, '47.) {Capi. i^th Inf., May 6, '48.) Brevet Capt, September 13, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Chapultepec. MARSHALL, ELISHA G. (Bvt. 2d Li. ifh Inf., July i, '50.) [Maj. lih Inf., June 12, '65.) Brevet Maj., June 27, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gaines's Mills, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., December 13. 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Fredericksburg, Va. Brevet Col., July 30, 1864, for gallant "and meritorious services in the action- that succeeded the explosion of the Petersburg mine, Va. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. MARSHALL, LOUIS H [Bvt. 2dLt. -id Inf., July'i, '49.) (Maj. \/\tk Inf., Oct. 16, '63.) Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. MARSTON, MORRELL. (1st Lt. 21st Inf. , Mar. 12, '12.) (Capt. 2 ist Inf., June 26, 'i3.)__ Brevet Maj., August 15, 1814, for gallant conduct in defence of F jrt Erie. 452 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 MARSTON, MATTHEW R. {2d Lt. ist Inf., April 26, '6 1 .) ( Capt. ist Inf., Jan. 10, '62.) Brevet Maj., July 4, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services during the siege of Vicksburg, Miss. MARTIN, JAMES G. {zd Lt. \st Arty., July i, '40) (^- Q- ^- {Cnpf.), Au^. 5, '47.) Brevet Maj., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. MARTIN, JAMES P. (Bvt. 2d Lt. etk Inf., July i, '60.) (A. A. G. [Maj.), April 10, "69.) Brevet Maj., July 2, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Lt.-Col., July 22, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services. MARTIN, JOHNW. {fid l.t. 2d Inf., July 7, '39.) . (2d Lt. T,d Dragoons, July 21, '47.) Brevet ist Lt., October 19, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Atlixco. MARTIN, OLIPHANT. (Ens. 22d Inf., May 20, '13.) (\st Lt. 22d Inf., Sept. 25, '14.) Retained, May, 1816 (in re-organization under Act of March 3, 1815) as 2d Lt., 5th Inf., with brevet of ist Lt., from September 25, 1814. MARTIN, "WriLLIAM J. (2d Lt. Voltigeurs, April t),\T.) (2d Lt. Voltigeurs, April <),'i-j.) Brevet ist Lt, September 13, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Chapultepec. MASON, ED-WIN C. (Capt.\7thInf.,MayH,'6i.) (Maj. 21st Inf., Sept t„'Ti.) Brevet Maj , IJecember 13, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Fredericl. (Bvt. 2d Lt. Engrs., July i, '36.) (Capt. Engrs., April 24, '47.) Brevet Maj , August 20, 1847, for gnllant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churul-usco. Brevet Lt -Col , September 8, 1847, for gallant and meritorioui conduct at Molino del Rey. MASON, JOHN S. (2d Lt. T,d Ar/y., July I, '47.) (Lt.-Col. ^th Inf., Dec. II, '73.) Mrevet Mij., Heptemlier 17, 186?, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of .-\iuietam, Md. Brevet Lt.-Col., December 13, 1862, for gallant and TO THE PRESENT TIME. 453 meritorious services at the battle of Fredericltsburg, Va. Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. Brevet Brig.- Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services in the field during the war. MASON, MILO. {£ns. 4t& Inf., June 18, '08.) [Capt Arty., May 17, '16.) Brevet Maj., May 17, 1826, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. MASON, RICHARD B. (2d Lt. S/A Inf., Sept. 2, '17.) (Col. \st Dragoons, June 30, '46.) Brevet Maj., July 31, 1829, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. Brevet Brig.-Gen., May 30, 1848, for meritorious conduct. MAUCK, CLARENCE. (2d Lt. iifh Cav., Mar. 27, '61.) (Capt. ifh Cav., Nov. 5, '63.) Brevet Capt., Dec. 31, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Stone River, Tenn. Brevet Maj., October 11, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services during the Atlanta campaign. MAURICE, THEODORE W. (2d Lt. Engrs., Aug. i, '13.) (Capt. Engrs., Nov. 12, '18.) Brevet Maj., November 12, 1828, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. MAURY, DABNEY H. (Bvt. 2d Lt. Mtd. Rifles, July I, '46.) (A. A. G. (Bvt. Capt.], April 17, '60.) Brevet ist Lt., April 18, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Cerro Gordo. MAXEY, SAMUEL B. (Bvt. 2dLt. nth Inf., July i, '46.) (2d Lt. %th Inf., Feb. 23, '47.) Brevet ist Lt., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. MAY, CHARLES A. (2d Lt. 2d Dragoons, June 8, '36.) (Maj. 2d Dragoons, Mar. 3, 'S5- ) Brevet Maj., May 8, 1846, for gallant and distinguished services in the battle of Palo Alto. Brevet Lt.-Col., May 9, 1846, for gallant and highly distinguished conduct at the battle of Resaca de la Palma. Brevet Col., February 23, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at the battle of Buena Vista. MAY, JAMES H. (2dLt. \2th Inf., Aug. 10, '63.) (\st Lt. \2th Inf., Dec. 31, '63.) Brevet Capt., May 5, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of the Wilderness, Va. MAY, JULIAN. (zd Lt. Mtd Rifles, May 27, '46.) (\st Lt. Mtd. Rifles, Oct. 31, '48.) Brevet ist Lt., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. MAYNADIER, HENRY E. (Bvt. 2d Lt. 1st Arty., July 1, '51.) (Maj. \2th Inf., N'crv. 4, '63.) Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. 4S4 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 MAY?IADIBR, VTILLIAM. {Bvf. 2d Lt. of Arty., July I, '27.) (C^)/. of Ordnance, June i, '63.) Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services in the Ordnance Department. MAYNADIER, "WILLIAM M. (2dLt. 1st Arty., May i, '6i.) (Paymaster (Ma/.), Afril 26, '75.) Brevet Capt., September 17, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Antletam, Md. Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for good conduct and gallant services during the war. McALESTER, MILES D. [Bvt. 2d Lt Engrs., July I, '56.) (Maj. of Engrs, Mar. 7, '67.) Brevet Maj. and Brevet Lt.-Col., July l, 1862, for gallant and meritorious ser- vices in Peninsula Campaign of 1862. Brevet Col., August 23, 1864, for highly meritorious services as Chief Engineer of Mil. Div.of West Miss., &:c. Brevet Brig.-Gen., April 9, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the siege of Mobile, Ala. McAllister, julian. (2d Lt. 2d Arty., July i, '47.) (Lt.-Col. Ord. Dept., June 23, '74.) Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services in the Ordnance Department. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and m;ritoriou3 services in the Ordance Departmsnt. Brevet Col., March 13, 1S55, for zeal, ability, an J faithfulness in the discharge of his duties as senior Ordnance Officer in the Department of the I'acific. McBRIDE, JOSEPH C. (\st Lt. ^%th Inf., Jan. 22, '67.) (\st Lt. ^th Inf., Jan. 22, '67.) Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. McCABE, ROBERT O. (Ens. 1st Inf., Jan. 3, '12.) (Capt. tfh Inf., May i, '24.) Retained, May, 1816 (in re-organization under Act of March 3, 18 15), as 2d Lt., 5th Inf., with brevet of 1st Lt., from May i, 1814. McCAFPERTY, NEIL J. (2dLt. 4//5 Cav., Feb. 19, '63.) (Capt. ifh Cav., Jan. 13, '68.) Brevet ist Lt., May 10, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services in cavalry action at Franklin, Tenn. McCALL, CHARLES A. (Asst. Surg., Aug. 5, '61.) (Asst. Surg., Aug. 5, '6l.) Brevet Capt. and Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. McCALL, GEORGE A. (2d Lt. 1st Inf., July 1, '22.) (I„s. Gen. (Col.), June 10, '50.) Brevet Maj. and Brevet Lt.-CJ., May 9, 1846, for gallant conduct at Palo Alto and Resaca de la Palma. McCALL, HUGH. (Ens., May 12, '94.) f^Capt. 2d Inf., Aug. 19, '00.) Brevet Maj., July 10, 1812. No record. TO THE PRESENT TIME. 455 McCLEARY, JOHN. (Bvt. zdLt. Zdlnf., July l, '54.) {Capt. 6tk Inf., May 17, '61.) Brevet Maj., July 2, i85j, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. McCLEERY, JAMES. (Capt. 45«'/5 Inf., July 28, '66.) (Capt. ^t,th Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Mission Ridge, Tenn. McCLEERY, "WILLIAM P. (zd Lt \%th Inf., May 14, '61.) (Capt. i8tA Inf., Dec. 31, '64 ) Brevet Capt, December 13, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Murfreesboro, Tenn. McCLELLAN, ELY. (Asst. Surg., Aug. 5, '61.) (Surg. (Ma/.), June 26, '76.) Brevet Capt. and Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious service during the war. McCLELLAN, &EORGE B. (Bvt. zd Li. Engrs., July i, '46.) (Maj.-Gen., May 14, '6t.) Brevet ist Lt., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. Brevet Capt., September 13, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Chapultupec. McCLELLAN, JOHN. (Bvt. ZdLt. ■id Arty., July i, '26.) (Capt. Top. Engrs., July 7, '38.) . Brevet Maj., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Contre- ras and Churubusco. Brevet Lt.-Col., September 13, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct in military operations before the city of Mexico. McCLINTOCK, JOHN. (\st Lt. \ifh Inf., May 14, '61.) (Capt. lifh Inf., April 30, '63.) Brevet Capt., July 2, 1863, for gallant and m'eritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. McCLINTOCK, "WILLIAM L. (yl Lt. yl Arty., May 20, '13.) (Maj. zd Arty., June 27, '43.) Brevet Maj., August 1 1, 1833, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. McCLURE, CHARLES. (Covi. of Subs. (Capt), Aug. 17, '66.) (Com. of Subs. (Capt.), Aug. 17, '66.) Brevet Maj., August 17, 1866, for faithful service in the Subsistence Depart- ment. McCLURE, DANIEL. (Bvt ZdLt. Mtd. Rifles, July I, '49.) (AssL P. M. G. (Col.), July 28, '66.) Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious service during the war. Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services in the Pay Department. 45 6 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 McCONIHE, SAMUEL. (2d Lt. \i,th Inf., Feb. 23, '66.) [Capt. li,th Inf., Feb. 25, '76.) Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of the Wilderness, Va. Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Spottsylvania, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. McCONNBLL, EDWARD. {\stLt. i6th Inf., Aug. 31, '6i.) {Capt. idth Inf., Sept. 30, '64.) Brevet Capt, December 31, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Murfreesboro, Tenn. Brevet Maj., September i, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services during the Atlanta campaign, and at the battle of Jonesboro, Ga. McCONNELIi, JOSEPH. (2dLt iZth Inf., Oct. 30, '61.) [ist Lt iSth Inf., . — .) Brevet Capt., December 31, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Murfreesboro, Tenn. McCONNELL, THOMAS R. (Bvt. zd Lt. zdinf, July i, '46.) {Capt. ifh Inf., Feb. 3, '55.) Brevet ist Lt., September 8, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Molino del Rey. Brevet Capt., September 13, 1847, for gallant and merito- rious conduct at Chapultepec. MoCOOK, ALEXANDER D. (Bvt. 2d Lt. ■id Inf., July i, '52.) (Lt.-Col. lotk Inf., Mar. 5, '67,) Brevet Maj., July 21, 1861, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Bull Run, Va. , Brevet Lt.-Col., March 3, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at 'the capture of Nashville, Tenn. Brevet Col., April 7, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Shiloh, Tenn. Brevet Brig.- Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Per- ryville, Ky. Brevet Maj.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services in the field during the war. MoCOOK, EDWARD M. (2d Lt ^kCav.,May%,'6i.) • (-ist Lt. d,th Cav., July \T,'(i2.) Brevet ist Lt. April 7, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Shiloh, Tenn. Brevet Capt., October 8, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Perryville, Ky. Brevet Maj., September 20, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Chickamauga, Ga. Brevet Lt.-Col., January 27, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services during the cavalry operations in East Tennessee. Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the capture of Selma, Ala. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services in the field during the war. Mccormick, charles. (Asst Surg, Aug. 30, '36.) (Asst Med. Pur. [Lt.-Col.), June. 26, '76.) Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. McCOW^N, JOHN P. (2dLt i^h Arty., July i, '40.) (Capt. i,th Arty., Jan, 9, '51.) Brevet Capt., April 18, 1847, for gallant and maritorious conduct at Cerro Gordo. TO THE PRESENT TIME. 457 McCOY, JAMES C. (2d Lt. 2d Inf., July 24, '66.) ( ist Lt. 2d Inf., Dec. 29, '68.) Brevet 1st Lt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Shiloh, Tenn. Brevet Capt., March ^, 1867, for gallant and merit- orious services in the siege of Vicksburg, Miss. Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Atlanta, Ga. Brevet Lt.- Col., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Ben- tonville, N. C. McCOY, JOHN. IjstLt. nth Inf., yan. 22, '67.) (ist Li. \\t!i Inf., Jan. 22, '67.) Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious conduct in action at Morristown, 1'enn. Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious conduct at the capture of Saltville, Va., December 22, 1864. McCOY, THOMAS F. (1st Lt. wth Inf., April 9, '47.) (\st Lt. nth Inf., April 9, '47.) Brevet Capt, August 20, 1847, for gallant^and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. McCREA, TULLY. (2dLt. \st Arty., June 17, '62.) (Capt. \st Arty., July 28, '66.) Brevet ist Lt., September 17, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Antietam, Md. Brevet Capt , July 3, 1863, for gallant and merit- orious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Maj., February 20, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Olustee, Fla. McDONAIiD, ALEXANDER J. (2d Lt. tfh Arty., Oct. 22, '62.) (ist Lt. <,th Arty., Jan. 17, '66.) Brevet ist Lt., December 13, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Fredericksburg, Va. Brevet Capt., May 3, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Chancellorsville, Va. Mcdonald, bedney f. (2d Lt. T^ Arty., May 22, '47.) (2d Lt. yl Arty., May 22, '47,) Brevet ist Lt., October 9, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at the battle of Huamantla. McDonald, james. (Capt. Rifles, May 3, '08.) (Col. 4th Rifles, Sept. 17, '14.) Brevet Col., Seiitember 17, 1814, for distinguished and meritorious conduct in the sortie from Fort Erie. Mcdonald, philip -w. (Bvt. 2d Lt. 2d Drags., July 1, '41.) (ist Lt. 2d Drags., Mar. 3, '47.) Brevet Capt., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. Brevet Maj., September 13, 1847, ^o"^ gallant conduct at Chapultepec. Mcdonald, ■william. (1st Lt. 26th Inf., May 20, '13.) (Asst. Ins. Gen. (Maj.), Apiil 29, '16.) Brevet Maj., July 25, 1814, for gallant conduct at the battle of Niagara. 45 8 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 McDOUGAI.1., CHARLES. (Asst. Surg., July 13, '32.) (Asst. Med. Pur. (Lt.-Col.), July 28, '66.) Brevet Col., November 29, 1864. (No service given in appointment, nomi- nation or commission.) Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. McDOtTGALI., THOMAS M. (zd Lt. i^h Inf., May 10, '66.) [Capt. yth Cav., Dec. IJ, '75-) Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for faithful and meritorious services. McDowell, irvin. (Bvt. id Lt. ist Arty., July I, '38.) (Miij.-Gen. Nov. 25, '72.) Brevet Capt., February 23, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Buena Vista. Brevet Maj.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Cedar Mountain, Va. MoELHONB, JAMES P. (ist Lt. lifh Inf., May 14, '61.) (Capt. i^h Inf, June 18, '64.) Brevet Capt., j une 27, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gaines's Mills, Va. Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. McELRATH, T. P. (id Lt. <,th Arty., May 14, '61.) [Capt. tfh Arty., Sept. 24, '66.) Brevet Capt., June 27, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle, of Gaines's Mills, Va. Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faithful services. Mcelroy, james n. (id Lt. 2d Cav., April 23, '66.) (Capt. Zth Cav., Mar. 6, '67.) Brevet ist Lt., Brevet Capt., and Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and rarritorious services in the battle of Spottsylvania, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. McEWEN, JOHN S. (zd Lt. i^h Arty., Aug. 17, '67.) - (zd Lt. ifh Arty., Aug. 17, '67.) Brevet 1st Lt., August 17, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Spottsylvania, Va. Brevet Capt , August 17, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Cold Harbor, Va. McPARLAND, WALTER. (Bvt. zd Lt. Engrs., July i, '60.) (Maj. Engrs., Mar. 7, '67.) Brevet Capt., November 23, 1861, for gallant and meritorious services during the bombardment of Fort Pickens, Fla. Brevet Maj., April ir, 1865, for able, zealous, and efficient services in the operations undertaken against Charleston in 1863. McPERRAN. JOHN C. (Bvt. zdLt. yllnf, July i, '43.) (Dep. Qr. Mr. Gen. (Lt-Col.), July 29, '66 ) Brevet Lt.-Col., Brevet Col., and Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. TO THE PRESENT TIME. 459 MoGILL, GEORGE M. {Jsst. Surg., April i6, '62.) {Asst. Surg., April 16, '62.) Brevet Capt., Mav 12, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services in action at Meadow Bridge, Va. Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faithful and merit- orious services during the war. Brevet Lt.-Col., September 28, i866, for meritorious and distinguished services at Hart's Island, whei-e cholera pre- vailed. Brevet Col., July 20, 1867, for faithful and meritorious services in the Medical Department during the prevalence of cholera near Fort Ilarker, Kas. MoGILVRAY, JOHN. (Bvt. 2d Lt. ifh Arty., Feb. 19, '63.) (ij-^ Lt. 2d Arty., May 6, '64.) Brevet Capt , Septem.ber 22, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Fisher's Hill, Va. McGINNESS, JOHN R. {tst Lt. Ordn., June II, '63.) [Capt. Ordn., Feb. 10, '69.) Brevet Capt, March i, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services during the siege oE Morris Island, S. C. Brevet Maj., March-13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the operations before Charleston, S. C. McGLASSIN, GEORGE. (Irf Lt. \ith Inf., Mar. 12, '12.) (Capt. itfh Inf., Aug. 15, '13.) Brevet Maj., September 11, 1814, for gallant conduct at the battle of Platts- burg. McGONNIGLE, A. J. (Asst. Qr. Mr. (Capt.), May 19, '65.) (Asst Qr. Mr. [Capt.), May 19, '65.) Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallantry at the battles of Winchester, Fisher's Hill, and Cedar Creek, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 2, 1867, for gal- lantry at the battles of Five Forks, Sailor's Creek, and Appomattox Court House, Va. Brevet Col., February 11, 1869, for meritorious services during the Indian campaign. McGOWN, GEORGE. (2d Lt. 7th Inf., Nm. 29, '61. J (Capt. yth Inf., Sept 19, '64.) Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services. Brevet Lt.-Col., November 15, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services connected with the mustering out and disbanding of the volunteer armies of the United States. McGregor, thomas. (2d Lt. \st Cav., July 17, '62.) (Capt 1st Cav., Oct. 15, '66.) Brevet Capt., Mav 6, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Todd's Tavern, Va. McGINNESS, JAMES T. (2d Lt. lyh Inf., Feb. 23, '66.) (Capt. \T,th Inf., Aug. 31, '71.) Brevet Capt., March 2, 1S67, for gallant and meritorious services in the bat- tle of Chickamauga, Ga. Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and merit- orious services in the battle of Mission Ridge, Tenn. McGUIRE, "WOODS. (2d Lt. 24 Inf, Aug. 5, '61 .) (istLt. T,d Inf., , — .) Brevet Capt., July i, 1862, for gallant and meritorious seivices at the battle of Malvern Hill, Va. 460 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 McILVAIJTB, TRANCIS E. {.Capt. \^th Inf., Nffv. 18, '61.) (Capt. i<)th Inf., Nffv. 18, '61.) Brevet Maj., September i, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services during the Atlanta campaign. Brevet Lt.-Cpl., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services. McINTOSH, JAMBS S. (zdLt. Rips, Nffv. 13, '12.) (Lt.-Col. tfh Inf., July 1, '39.) Brevet Maj., March 8, 1827, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. Brevet Col., Mayg, 1846, for gallant and distinguished services in the battles of Palo Alto and Resaca de la Palma. McINTOSH, JOHN. (2dLt. nth Inf. Feb. 19, '63.) (Capt. 20th Inf., Oct. 5, '67.) Brevet Capt., August i, 1864, for gallant services in the battle of the Wilder- ness, Va. McINTOSH, JOHN B. (zd Lt. 2d Cav., Juve 8, '61.) (Lt.-Col. ifld Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet Maj., August 5, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the bat- tle of White Oak Swamp. Brevet Lt.-Col., July 3, 1863, for gallant and merit- orious services at the battle of Gettysburg, I'a. Brevet Col., June i, 1864, for gallant and meritorious .services at. the battle of Ashland, Va. Brevet Brig.- Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Winchester, Va. Brevet Maj.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and merit- orious services in the field during the war. McINTYRB, JAMBS B. (Bvt. 2d Lt. jth Inf., July i, '53.) [Maj. 3d Cav., July 28, '66.) Brevet Maj., May 10, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services in the cav- alry action at Franklin, Tenn. Brevet Lt.-Col., September 25, 1863, for gal- lant and meritorious services in action near Chickamauga, Ga. McINTYRE, SAMUBL B. (2d It. ith Arty., June 17, '62.) (\stLt. 2d Arty., Mar. 30, '64.) Brevet ist Lt., August 30, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Bull Run (2d), Va. Brevet Capt., September 19, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Winchester, Va. McKBB, JAMBS C. (Asst. Surg., Oct. 2, '58.) (Surgeon (Maj), Dec. 22, '64.) Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. ° McKBE, GEORGE W. (ist Lt. Ordn. Dept., June 1 1, '63.) ( Capt. Ordn. Defit, June 23, '74.) Brevet Capt. and Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for efficient and valuable ser- vices durmg the war. McKBE, SAMUBL A. (zdLt. 2d Inf., Aug. 5, '61.) [Capt. 2d Inf., Sept. 12, '62.) Brevet Maj., May 3, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Chancellorsville, Va. TO THE PRESENT TIME. 46I McKEEVER, CHAUNCEY." (Bvt. zd Lt. 1st Arty., July i, '49.) {A. A Gen. {Lt.-Col.), Mar. 3, 75.) Brevet Lt.-Col., September 24, 1864, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. Brevet Col., March 13, 1865. for diligent, faithful, and merit- orious services in the Adjutant-General's Department during the war. Brevet Brig.-Gen.,. March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. McKEEVER, SAMUEL. (2d Lt. i6ih Inf., Feb. 23, '66. ) (\st Lt. 2d. Inf., Feb. 23, '66.) Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. Mckenzie, kenneth. (Capt. \ifh Inf., July 6, '12.) [Capt. 14th Inf., July 6, '12.) Retained in 18 15 (in reorganization under Act of March 3 of that year) as 1st Lt., 4th Infantry, with Brevet of Capt. from July 6, 1812. Mckenzie, thom s g. (Asst Surg., April 16, '62,) [Asst Surg., April 16, '62.) Brevet Capt. and Brevet Maj., March 13, i865,''for faithful and meritorious services during .the war. McKIBBIN, CHAMBERS. (2d Lt. \ifh Inf., Sept. 22, '62.) (Capt. itfh Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet Capt., August 18, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of North Anna River, and during the operations on the Weldon R. R. McKIBBIN, DAVID B. (2d Lt.^tk Inf., Mar. Zt'SS-) {Mqf. loth. Inf., Sept. it,, '6y.) Brevet Maj., August I, 1864, for gallant services at the battle on the North Anna, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., August i, 1864, for gallant services at the battle of Bethesda Church, Va. Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and merit- orious services during the war. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. McKIBBIN, ROBERT P. (2d Lt. 4tk Inf., Aug. 5, '61.) (Capt. i^th Inf., Jan. 20, '65.) Brevet Capt., September 17, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Antietam, Md. Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for gallant and merit- orious services in front of Petersburg, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. McKIM, JAMES. {2dLt. 6tk Inf., July 18, '62.) (Capt. jjth Inf., , — .) Brevet ist Lt., July 2, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Capt., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. McKIM, "WltLIAM W. (A. Q. M. (Capt.), July 2, '64.) (A. Q. M. (Capt.), July 2, '64.) Brevet Maj., Brevet Lt.-Col., and Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. 462 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 McKINSTRY, JUSTUS. (2dLt. 2d Inf., July i, '38.) (6- ^- Waj^, ^«g- 3> '6l-) Brevet Maj., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. Mcknight, james. (Capt. 1st Arty., May 14, '61.) (Crt//. \st Arty., May 14, '61.) Brevet Maj., October 19, 1S64, for gallant and meritorious services at the battles of Spottsylvania, Cold Harbor, and Cedar Creek, Va. McLANDBURG, HENRY J. Ifiapt. lyt/i Inf., Aug. 5, '61.) (Capt. lyth Inf., Aug. 5, '61.) Brevet Maj., December 14, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Fredericksburg, Va. McLANE, GEORGE. (2d Lt. Mtd. Rifles, May 27, '46.) (Capt. Mtd. Rifles, Dec. 30, '56.) Brevet ist Lt., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. Brevet Capt., September 13, 1847, ^^^ gallant and meritorious conduct at Chapultepec. McLaren, adam n. (Asst. Surg., Mar. 2, '33.) (Surg. [Maj.), June 30, '39.) Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. McLAUGHLEN, NAPOLEON B. (2d Lt. ifk Cav., Mar. 27, '61.) (Ma/, loth Cav., May 17, '76.) Brevet Maj., May 3, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Cbancellorsville, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., July 2, 1863, for gallant and merit- orious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the rebel attack upon Fort Sted- man, Va. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious ser- vices in the field during the war. McLELLAN, CURVTEN B. (2dLt. 6th Call., May 14, '61.) (Capt. dth Cav., July 28, '66.) Brevet ist Lt., May 5, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Williamsburg, Va. Brevet Capt., July 3, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services in the Gettysburg campaign. Brevet Maj., March 31, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Dinwiddle C. H., Va. McLOUGHLIN, GEORGE H. (2dLt. 2d Inf., Oct. 24, '61.) (Capt. 2d Inf., Dec. I, '63.) Brevet Maj., August i, 1864, for gallant services at the battle of the North Anna River, Va., and during the campaign before Richmond. McMAHON, T. P. (id Lt. 16th Inf., April 16, '13.) (\st Lt. i&k Inf., Jan. i, '14.) Retained May, 1816 (in reorganization under Act of March 3, 1815), as 2d Lt. of Ordnance, with Brevet of Capt. from January i, 1814. TO THE PRESENT TIME. 463 MoMANUS, WILLIAM S. (Capt. \tfh Inf., Aug. 5, '61.) (Capt. \i,th Inf., Aug. 5, '61.) Brevet Maj., September r, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Mission Ridge, Tenn., and during the Atlanta campaign and the bat- tle of Jonesboro, Ga. McMICHAEL, CLAYTON. (2rfZ/. f)th Inf., Aug. 5, '61.) {Capt. f)th Inf., Mar 4, '64.) Brevet Maj., April 2, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the cap- ture of Petersburg, Va. McMillan, james. {Bvt. 2dLt. 2d Inf., July i, '56.) \Capt. yl Arty., Aug. 10, '61.) Brevet Maj., March 30, 1865, for meritorious and faithful services in the re- cruitment of the armies of the United States. McMillan thomas. (Asst. Surg., Aug. 19, '62.) [Asst. Surg., Aug. ig, '62.) Brevet Capt. and Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1867, for meritorious and distinguished services during the outbreak of cholera among a detachment of recruits for the 8th Infantry, en route from New York to San Francisco. McMULLIN, GEOR&I! O. (2«" Lt. yl Cav., Feb. 19, '63.) {Capt. ^d Cav., July 28, '68.) Brevet ist Lt., November 15, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services in action near Tuscumbia, Ala. Brevet Capt., March 13, 1865, for meritorious services. McNALLY, CHRISTOPHER H. {2d Lt. Mtd. Rifles, May 23, '55.) {Capt. Mtd. Rifles, Sept. 28, '61.) Brevet Capt., July 25, 1861, for gallant and meritorious services in action near Mesilla, A. T. Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for meritorious services during the war. McNAUGHT, J. S. {zdLt. \ith Inf., Feb. 19, '63.) {Capt. 20th Inf., Oct. 5, '67.) Brevet Capt., August I, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of the Wilderness, Va. McNEIL, JOHN, Jr. {Capt. wth Inf., Mar: 12, '12.) {Col. \st Inf., April 28, '26.) Brevet Lt.-Col., July 5, 1814, for distinguished and meritorious services at the battle of Chippewa. Brevet Col., July 25, 1814, for gallant and distin- guished conduct at the battle of Niagara. Brevet Brig.-Gen., July 25, 1824, for 10 years' faithful services in one grade. McNEILL, WILLIAM GIBBS. (■^ Lt. Arty., July 17, '17.) ( Top. Engr. \Bvt. Maj.), Jan. 28, '34.) Brevet Maj., January 27, 1833, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. McNETT, ANDREW J. {Capt. 442'/5 Inf., July 28, '66.) • {Capt. 44tA Inf., July 28, '(£) Brevet Major, March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services m the battle of Resaca, Ga. Brevet Lt.-Col.. March 2, 1867, for gallant and merit- orious services in the battle of Peach Tree Creek, Ga. 464 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 McNUTT, JOHN. (Bvt. 2.d Lt. of Ordn., July I, '40.) (Lt.-Col. of Ordn., June 23, '74.) Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful services in the Ordnance De- partment. Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful services in his Department during the war. McPARLIN, THOMAS A. (Asst. Surg., Mar. 2, '49.) {Surg. (Afaj.), May 2T, '61.) Brevet Lt.-Col., August i, 1864, for faithful and meritorious services in the field. Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. Brevet Brig.-Gen., November 26, 1866, for meritorious and distin- guished services at New Orleans, La., where cholera and yellow fever prevailed. McFHAIL, DANIEL H. {2d Li. tfh Inf., Mar. 8, '37.) {Capt. ffh Inf., July 10, '46.) Brevet Maj., August 20, 1847, f*"^ gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churuijusco. McFHBRSON, R H. {\st Lt. Light Arty., Dec. 12, '08.) {^Maj. Lt. Arty. Aug. 31, '14.) Brevet Maj., November 11, 1813, for services in the campaign on the St. Lawrence in 1813. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 30, 1814, for distinguished gallantry in the battle of LacoUe Mill, Lower Canada, etc. MoQUISTON, HENRY. {2dLt. 6th Cav., July 17, '62.) (2d Lt. 6th Cav., July lf,''62.) Brevet ist Lt., June 9, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the bat- tle of Beverly Ford, Va. Brevet Capt., June 21, 1863, for gallant and merit- orious services in action at Upperville, Va. • McRXHi, SAMUEIi. (2dLt. %th Inf., July i, '20.) {Qr. M. {Maj.), New. 8, '39.) Brevet Lt.-Col., May 30, 1848, for meritorious conduct while serving in the enemy's country. McREB, "WILLIAM. {2d Lt. Engrs., July I, '05.) (Lt.-Col. Engrs., Nov. 12, '18.) Brevet Lt.-Col, July 25, 1814, for gallant conduct at the battle of Niagara. Brevet Col., August 15, 1814, for distinguished and meritorious services in de- fence of Fort Erie. McREYNOLDS, ANDREW. (Capt. 2d Drags., April % '47.) (Capt. -^d Drags., April g, '47.) Brevet Maj., August 20, 1847, for gallant! and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. McTAGGART,. CALVIN P. {2dLt. 44ih Inf., Jan. 22, '67.) {ist Lt. \-]th Inf., Mar. 4, '73.) Brevet ist Lt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Fair Oaks, Va. TO THE PRESENT TIME. 465 MEADE, GEORGE. {ut Lt. qth Inf., Nov. 29, '65) (Ccipt. ist Arty., July 28, '66.) Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Lt.-Cul., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the campaign ending in the surrender of tlie Army of Northern Virginia. MEADE, GEORGE G. {Bvt. zd Lt. yi Arty., July I, '35.) [Maj.-Gen., Aug. 18, '64.) Brevet ist Lt., September 23, 1846, for gallant conduct at Monterey. MTIAGHBR, PATRICK. (zd Lt. \-^th Inf., Oct. 24, '61.) (ij-^ Lt. i^t/i Inf., Jan. 4, '62.) Brevet Capt., July 4, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services during the siege of Vicksburg, Miss. MEARS, FREDERICK. {2d Lt. gt/i Inf., April 26, '61.) {Capt. <^h Inf., Aug. Tj, '63.) Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. MBCHEM, ABEL P. {Asst. Surg., Oct. II, '60.) {Surg. {Maj.), June 16, '67.) Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. MEIGS, JOHN R. ( iJif Lt. Corps Engrs., June 1 1, '63.) ( \st Lt. Corps Engrs., June 1 1, ^(si^S Brevet Capt., September 19, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of the Opequan, Va. Brevet Maj., September 22, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Fisher's Hil 1, Va. MBIGS, MONTGOMERY C. {2dLt. 1st Arty., ^ly i, '36.) {Q. M. Gen. {B. G.), May 15, '61.) Brevet Maj.-Gen., July 5, 1864, for distinguished and meritorious services during the war. MEINELIi, HENRY. (zd Lt. 2d Arty., Oct. 24, '61.) {\st Lt. ^d Arty., Nm>. i, '61.) Brevet Capt., December 13, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Fredericksburg, Va. MBINHOIiD, CHARLES. {zd Lt. yl Cav., July 17, '62.) , {Capt. 31/ Cav., Dec. I, '66.) JBrevet ist Lt., May I, 1863, for. gallant and meritorious services in action at Blackwater Bridge, Miss. Brevet Capt., May 22, 1863; for gallant and meritorious services in an assault on Vicksburg, Miss. MELLON, CHARLES. (2dLt. Arty., Mar. 17, '14.) . . {Capt. zd Arty., Dec. 28, '35.) Brevet Capt., April 20, 1828, for 10 years' faithful services in one grade. MENDELL, GEORGE H. {Bvt. zd.Lt. Top. Engrs., July i, '52.) . {Maf. Engrs., Aug. 15, '64.): Brevet Lt.-Col., August 15, 1864, fbr gallalit arid meritorious services diifing 21 466 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 the present campaign before Richmond. Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for gal- lant and meritorious services during the war. MENDElTHAIiI., JOHN. {Bvt. 2d Lt. 1st Drags., July i, '51.) (Capt. ifk Arty., July 3, '61.) Brevet Maj., April 7, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Shiloh, Tenn. Brevet Lt.-Col., September 20, 1863, for gallant and merit- orious services at the battle of Chickamauga, Ga. Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. MERCHANT, CHAKUiS G. (Bvt. 2dLt. StA Inf., July i, '43.) \,ist Lt. St/t Inf., Aug. 2, '48.) Brevet 1st Lt., September 8, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Molino del Key. Brevet Capt., September 13, 1847, for gallant and merit- orious conduct at Chapultepec. lOERCHANT, CHARLES S. (3 ^'<^- 7. 'S^O Brevet Maj., May 9, 1846, for gallant'conduct at Palo Alto, and Resaca de la Palma. Brevet Lt.-Col., September 8, 1847, for gallant and meritorious con- duct at Molino del Key. MOORE, ALEXANDER. {Cap. 38//i liif; Jan. 22, '67.) (dipt. 31/ Cav., Jan. 22, '67.) Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious conduct in the bat- tle of Gettysburg, Pa. MOORE, JOHN. {Asst. Surg., Jtme 29, 'S3-) (Surgeon (Major), June 11, '62.) Brevet Lt.-Col., September i, 1864, for gallant and meritorious service during the Atlanta campaign. Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious service during the war. MOORE, JAMES M. (A. Q. M. (Capt.), July 2, '64.) (Q. M. (Major), June 13, '67.) Brevet Maj., March 13, i865,for fa'thful and meritorious service during the war. Brevet Lt.-Col., November 24, 1865, for faithful and meritorious ser- vices. MOORE, ORLANDO H. (zd Lt. 6th Inf., June 27, '56.) (Maj. 6th Inf., June 8, '72.) Brevet Maj , July 4, 1863, for gallant and meritorious service in action at Tibbs' Bend, Ky. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and merito- rious service during the war. MOORE, TRED"WEI.L. (Bvt. 2d Lt. 8th Inf, Jtily i, '47.) (Dep. Q. M. Gen. (Lt.-Col.), Jiine 6, '72.) Brevet Maj., March n, 1865, for faithful and meritorious service during the war. Brevet Lt.-Col., Miirch 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious service in Nevada in 1861. Brevet Co!., March 13, 1865, for meritorious service during Morgan's raid into Ohio in 1863. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious service during the war. MOORE, THOMAS "SV. C. (zd Lt. lUh /«/, May IX, '66.) (Capt. ipth Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet Maj., March 2, T867, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Todd's Tavern, Va. Brevet Lt.'-Col., March 2, 1867, for gallant and merit- orious service in the battle of Cedar Creek, Va. MOORE, "WILLIAM G. (Paymaster (Maj.), Nov. 14, '66.) (Paymaster (Maj.\, Nov. 14, '66.) Brevet Lt.-Col.,March 2, 1867, for faithful and meritorious services. MOORHEAD, -WTILLIAM J. (1st Lt. lyth Inf., May 14, '61.) {Capt. lyth Inf., June 27, '62.) Brevet Maj., July 6, 1864, for gallant service during the war, especially at the battles of Fredericksburg, Va., and Gettysburg, Pa. TO THE PRESENT TIME. ^73 MORDECAI, ALFRED. {Bvt. 2d Lt. Engrs., July i, '23.) {MajoY ofOrdn., Dec. 31, '54..) Brevet Maj., May 30, 1848, for meritorious conduct, particularly in perform- ance of his duties in the prosecution of the war with Mexico. MORDECAI, ALFRED. (Bvt. 2d Lt. Top Engrs., June 24, '61.) [Major ofOrdn., June 23, '74.) Brevet Maj., September 7, 1863, for gallant and meritorious service during the siege of Fort Wagner, S. C. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for distin- guished service in the field, and faithful and meritorious service in the Ordnance Department. MORGAN, CHARLES H. (Bvt. 2d Lt. of Arty., July i, '57.) (Major i,th Arty., Feb. 5, '67.) Brevet Maj., July 3, 1863, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Lt.-Col., October 14, 1863, for gallant and meri- torious seivice in action at Bristow Station, Va. Brevet Col., May 12, 1864, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Spottsylvania, Va. Brevet Brig. -Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service in the field during the war. MORGAN, GEORGE W. (Col. i^th Inf., April g, '47.) ( Col. \tfh Inf., April 9, '47.) Brevet Brig.-Gen., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Contreras and Churubusco. MORGAN, HENRY C. (\stLt. \2th Inf., May 14, '61.) [Capt. \2th Inf., June 16, '63.) Brevet Maj., July 2, 1863, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Lt.-Col., May 5, 1864, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of the Wilderness, Va. MORGAN, JAMES N. (zdLt. -^th Inf., July 28, '66.) (Capt. 2i,th Inf., Jmie 20, '73.) Brevet ist Lt., and Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious conduct in the battle of Stone River, Tenn. Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service in the battle of New Hope Church, Va. MORGAN, MICHAEL R. (2d Lt. yl Arty., July i, '54.) (Com. of Subs. (Maj.), Nov. 17, '65.) Brevet Maj., Brevet Lt.-Col., and Brevet Col., July 6, 1864, for distinguished services as Chief Commissary of Subsistence of the armies operating in the cam- paign of 1864, before Richmond, Va. Brevet Brig.-Gen., April g, 1865, for gal- lant and meritorious service during the campaign terminating with the surren- der of the insurgent army under Gen. Lee. MORGAN, -WILLOUGHBY. (^Capt. \2th Inf., April 2^, '12.) (Col. 1st Inf., April 2^, '30.) Retained, May, 1815 (in reorganization under Act of March 3, 1815), as Capt. Rifles, with Brevet of Maj., from June 26, 1813, date of his appointment as Maj: 12th Inf. Brevet Col., November 10, 1828, for 10 years' faithful ser- vice in one grade. 21* 474 BREVETS COI^fFERRED FROM 1 8 12 MORONEY, PATRICK H. {2ii Lt. li^h Inf., yum 27, '62.) (ist Lt. \^h Inf., July 1 1, '63.) Brevet Capt., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service during the war. MORRIS, ARTHUR. {2d Lt. 4th Arty., Mar. 24, '62.) [\st Lt. ifk Arty., Nvb. 12, '63.) Brevet ist Lt., June 30, 1862, for gallant and meritorioiis service at the battle of White Oak Swamp, Va. Brevet Capt., September 17, 1862, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Antietam, Md. MORRIS, GOUVERNEUR. (2d Lt. d,th Inf., May 24, '24.) (Lt.-Col. 1st Inf., May 31, '57.) Brevet Maj., May 9, 1846, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Palo Alto and Resaca de la Palma. MORRIS, LOUIS M. (2d Lt. 20th Inf., July 28, '66.) ( \st Lt. 20th Inf., Oct. 22, '67.) Brevet istLt., and Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service during the war. MORRIS, LEWIS N. (zd Lt. Corps of Arty., July \, '20.) (Capt. ^d Inf., Oct. 31, '33.) Brevet Maj., May 9, 1846, for gallant and distinguished conduct at Palo Alto, and Resaca de la Palma. MORRIS, LOUIS T. (ist Lt. igth Inf., May 14, '61.) (Capt. %thCav., Feb. 15, '65.) Brevet Capt., September 1,1864, ^or gallant and meritorious service during the Atlanta campaign. Brevet Maj., December 16, 1864, for gallant and mer- itorious service at the battle of Nashville, Tenn. MORRIS, RICHARD L. Jr. (\st Lt. l&th Inf., May 14, '61.) (Capt. \%th Inf., Dec. 31, '62.) Brevet Maj., December 31, 1862, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Murfreesboro, Tenn. MORRIS, ROBERT M. (2d Lt. Mtd. Rifles, May 27, '46.) (Maj. 6th Cav., Mar. 1 1, '63.) Brevet ist Lt., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras. Brevet Capt, September 13, 1847, for gallant and meritorious con- duct at Chapultepec. Brevet Maj., February 21, 1862, for gallant and merit- orious service at Valverde, N. M. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 31, 1865, for gal- lant and meritorious service at the battle of Dinwiddie Court House, Va. MORRIS, THOMPSON. (2d Lt. 2d Inf., July i, '22.) (Lt.-Col. ^th. Inf., Mar. 3, '55.) Brevet Maj., April 18, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Cerro Gordo. Brevet Lt.-Col., August 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Contreras and Churubusco. MORRIS, "V7ILLIAM W. 1 (2d Lt. 6th Inf., July i, 20.) (Col. 2d Arty., Nov. I, '61.) Brevet Maj., January 27, 1837, for gallant conduct, &c., in war against TO THE PRESENT TIME. 475 Florida Indians. Brevet Brig.-Gen , June 9, 1862, for faithful and merit- orious service. Brevet Maj.-Gen., December 10, 1865, for faithful and merit- orious service during tlie rebellion. MORRISON, PITCAIRN. (2d Lt. Arty., Oct. 27, '20.) {Col.. Ztk Inf., June 6, '61.) Brevet. Maj., May g, 1846, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Palo Alto, and Resaca de la Palma. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for long and faithful service in the army, MORROW, ALEXANDER. (1st Lt. <)th Inf., April 9, '47.) (\st Lt. j. y.st Inf., May i, '14.) Retained, in 181 5 (in re-organization under Act of March 3 of that year), as Capt. 4th Inf., with brevet of Major, from May i, 1814. MULLIGAN, JAMES B. (Capt. \^th Inf., Oct. 26, '61.) (Capt. igth Inf., Oct. 26, '61.) Brevet Maj., September 20, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battles of Murfreesboro, Tenn., and Chickamauga, Ga. Brevet Lt -Col., Sep- tember i, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services during the Atlanta cam- paign and in the battle of Jonesboro, Ga. MUNROE, JOHN. (yl Lt. of Arty., Mar. II, '14.) (Lieut.-Col. i^h Arty., Nov. 11, '46.) Brevet Maj., February 15, 1838, for faithful and meritorious conduct, &c. during three campaigns against Florida Indians. Brevet Lt.-Col., September 23, 1846, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Monterey, Mexico. Brevet Col., February 23, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at the battle of Buena Vesta. MURDOCS, JOHN B. (1st Lt zffh Inf., Mar. 12, '12.) (Capt. 2.tfh Inf., Apl. 16, '13.) Brevet Maj., July 25, 1814, for gallant conduct at the battle of Niagara. MURPHY, EDV7ARD. (2d Lt. ^th Cav., Feb. 19, '63.) (1st Lt. tfh Cav., Dec. 7, '63.) Brevet Capt., May 6, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Todd's Tavern, Va. Brevet Maj., September 19, 1864, for gallant and meri- torious services at the battle of Winchester, Va. MURRAY, ALBERT M. (id Lt. st/t Arty., Ju,ie 17, '62.) ( ist Lt 2d Arty., Mar. 30, '64.) Brevet Capt., September 16, 1862. for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Antietam, Md. Brevet Maj., July 22, 1864, for gallant and meritorious conduct before Atlanta, Ga. TO THE PRESENT TIME. 477 MURRAY, ROB£RT. {Asst. Surg., June 29, '46.) (Surgeon [Col.), June 26, '76.) Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. MUSSEY, REUBEN B. {Capt. 19//* Inf., May 14, '61.) {Capt. if)th Inf., May 14, '61.) Brevet Maj., Brevet Lt.-Col., and Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious conduct during the war. MYER, ALBERT J. (Asst. Surg, Sept. 18, '54.) (C&iefSig. Off. {Col.) July 28, '65.) Brevet Lt.-Col., May 27, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Hanover Court House, Va. Brevet Col., July 2, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Malvern Hill, Va. Brevet Brig.-Gen.,March 13, 1865, for distinguished services in organizing, instructing, and commanding the Signal Corps of ihe Army, and for its especial service on October 5th, 1864 the day on .which " the post and garrison at AUatoona, Ga., and a most valuable depository of provisions there, attacked by the rebel army, were saved by troops brought up by signal, just in time to defend it ; the messages being sent over the heads of the enemy, and when communication in any other way was im- possible." MYERS, ABRAHAM C. (Bvt 2dLt. Afh Inf., July i, '33.) [A. Q. M., (Capt) Nth Inf., Sept. i, '68.) Brevet ist Lt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and merito- rious services during the war. Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for meritorious ser- vices in the Signal Corps during the war, especially while Chief Signal Officer of the Army of the Potomac, Department of Virginia and North Carolina, and Department of the Susquehanna. NORTON, MARTIN. {zdLt. 2d Inf., May 24, '66.) {\st Lt. 2d Inf., May 21, '68.) Brevet ist Lt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Bull Run (2d), Va. Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. NORTON, THOMAS H. (Capt. \ith Inf., Aug. 5, '61.) (Capt. \cfh Inf., Aug. 5, '61.) Brevet Maj., September i, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Mission Ridge, Tenn, and in the Atlanta campaign and battle of Jonesboro, Ga. NOTSON, "WILLIAM M. (Asst. Surg., April \6, '62.) (Asst. Surg., April 16, '62.) Brevet Capt., July 3, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle *of Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. 482 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM I8l2 NORVZiLL, JOHN M. {isi It. ■x,\st Inf., July 28, '66.) {Capt. I2tk Inf., Jan. 31, '74.) Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service in the bat- tle of Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service in the battle of the Wilderness, Va. NOUBEXi, CHARLES 3. {1st Lt. 2d Light Drags., May 7, '12.) (A. A. G (Maj) Sept. 14. '14.) Brevet Capt., August 15, 1813, for meritorious services. NOYBS, HENRY E. (Bvt. 2d Lt. 2d Cav. June 24, '61.) (Capt. 2d Cav., Jan. 25, '65.) Brevet Capt., August i, 1863, for gallant and meritorious service at the bat- tle of Brandy Station, Va. Brevet Maj., April 2, 1865, for gallant and merit- orious service at the capture of Selma, Ala. NUGENT, ROBERT. (Capt. 13M Inf., Aug. 5, '61.) {Maj. z^th Inf., June 10, 'j6.) Brevet Maj., June 27, '6^, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Giines's Mills, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., December 13, 1862, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Fredericksburg, Va. Brevet Col., April 2, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service in action in front of Petersburg, Va. OAKES, JAMES. {Bvt. 2dLt. 2d Drags., July i, '46.) ( Col. 6th Cav., July 31, '66.) Brevet ist Lt, March 25, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Med- elin, near Vera Cruz. Brevet Capt., September 8, 1847, for gallant and merit- orious conduct at Molino del Rey. Brevet Col., and Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 30, 1865, for meritorious and faithful service in the recruitment pf the army of the United States. O'BEIRNE, RICHARD F. (i.f/ Lt. 14th Inf., May 14, '61. {Capt 21st Inf., Oct. 25, '61.) Brevet Maj., August i, 1864, for gallant service at the battle of the North Anna River, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., August 18, 1864, for gallant service at the battle on the Weldon Rail Road. O'BRIEN, JOHN P. J. {2d Lt. ifh Arty., July I, '36.) {Capt. ^h Arty., May 16, '49.) Brevet Maj., February 23, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct a Buena Vesta. OCCIiBSTON, WILLIAM B. {2dLt. \t,(h Inf., May 14, '6r.) {Capt., yh Inf., July i, '65.) Brevet Capt., April 7, 1862, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Shiloh, Tenn. Brevet Maj., December 31, 1862, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Murfreesboro, Tenn. O'CONNELL, JOHN D. {Bvt.2dLt.2d Jnf, July I, '52.) {Mqf. ijth rnf, Aug. it,'€6.) Brevet Maj., June 27, 1862, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Gaines's Mills, Va. Brevet Lt.-C ol , December 13, 1862, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Fredericksburg, Va. Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service during the war. TO THE PRESENT TIME. 483 O'CONNELL, \IV-II,LIAM. (2(/ Lt. ifh Cav., Oct. 24, '61.) (Capt. 4f/i Cav., Sept. 27, '66.) Brevet Capt., May 22, 1863, for gallant and meritorious service in action at Middleton, Tenn. Brevet Maj. April, 2, 1865, for gallant and meritorious ser- vices at the capture of Selma, Ala. ODELL, AZAEIAH ^fT. (lit Lt. iyi Inf., April zt^, '12.) (Capt. 2yi Inf., yune 20, '13.) Brevet Maj., July 25, 1814, for gallant conduct at the battle of Niagara. OFFLEY, ROBERT H. {2il Lt. 1st Inf.,May 14, '57.) (Capt. 1st Inf., Nmi. 23, '61.) Brevet Maj., July. 4, 1863, for gallant and meritorious service during the siege of Vicksburg, Miss. O'FLYNG, PATRICK. (Ens. ^th Inf., July 31, '14.) [2d Lt. i,(itk Inf., Feb. II, "15.) Brevet 1st Lt., September 17, 1814, for gallant conduct in sortie from Fort Erie. OGDEN, CORNELIUS A. (2dLt. Engrs., July i, '19.) {Maj. Engrs., Dec. 7, '38.) Brevet Capt., June 30, 1834, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. • OGDEN, EDMUND A. [Bvt. 2d Lt., 1st Inf., July i, '31.) (A. Q. M. (Capt.), July 7, '38.) Brevet Maj., May 30, 1848, for meritorious conduct. OGDEN, MORGAN L. (istLt. iStA Inf., May 14, '61.) {Capt. i8//5 Inf., Aug. 12, '63.) Brevet Maj., December 31, 1862, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Murfreesboro, Tenn. OGILBY, FREDERICK D. {istLt i^th Inf., May 14, '61.) {Capt. ?,th Inf., June 26, '46.) Brevet Capt., and Brevet Maj., December 31, 1862, for gallant and merit- orious service at the battle of Murfreesboro, Tenn. O'HARA, THEODORE. {A. Q. M. (Capt.), June 26, '46.) [A. Q. M. {Capt.), June 26, '46.) Brevet Maj., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct in the battles of Contreras and Churubusco. OLCOTT, EGBERT W. {2d Lt. 1st Arty., Oct. 24, '61.) {1st Lt. ist Arty., Feb. 20, '62.) Brevet Capt, June 30, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of New Market Cross Roads, Va. Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for good con- duct and gallant service during the war. OLMSTEAD, "WILLIAM A. {2dLt. \-ith Inf, May 11, '66.) {\st Lt. 22d Inf, Sept. 15, '67.) Brevet Capt., September 15, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Malvern Hill, Va. Brevet Maj., September 15, 1867, for gallant 484 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 and meritorious service in the battle of Fredericksburg, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., September 15, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service in the battle of Hatch- er's Run, Va. ORD, EDWARD O. C. (2dLt. zdArty., July i, '39.) (Brig. Gen. July 26, '66.) Brevet Lt.-Col., December 20, 1861, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Dranesville, Va. Brevet Col., September 19, 1862, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of luka. Miss. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle oE theHatchie, Miss. Brevet Maj.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service at the assault of Fort Harrison,. Va. ORD, PLACIDUS. (zd Lt. 1st Inf., May n, '66.) (ist Lt. 1st Inf., Sept. 18, '67.) Brevet ist Lt., March 2, 1867, for gallant aid meritorious service in the siege of Vicksburg, Miss. Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meri- torious service in the siege of Petersburg, Va. Brevet Maj., March 2,1867, for gallant and meritorious service in the battle of Chiipin's Farm, Va. O'REILLY, LUKE. [\st Lt. Tfyth Inf., July 28, '66.) (Capt. i^th Inf., Oct. i, '68.) ' Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service in the cap- ture of Savannah, Ga. O'RORKE, P. H. (Bvt. 2d Lt. Engrs., June 24, '61.) (ist Lt Engrs. Mar. 3, '63.) Brevet Capt., March 15, 1862, for meritorious services with the Port Royal Expeditionary Corps. Brevet Maj., December 13, 1862, for gallant and meri- torious service at the battle of Fredericksburg, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., May i, 1863, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Chancellorsville; Va. Brevet Col., July 2, 1863, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa., where he was killed. ORTON, SAMUEL H. (Asst Surg., Nov. 22, '62.) (Asst. Surg., Nov. 22, '62.) Brevet Capt. and Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious service during the war. OSBORNE, NATHAN "W. (Capt. ijt/i Inf., May 14, '61.) (Maj. l^t/i Inf., Dec. 11, '73.) Brevet Maj., July 4, 1863, for gallant and meritorious service during the siege of Vicksburg, Miss. OTIS, ELMER. (Bvt. zd Lt 1st Inf., July i, '53.) (Lt.-Col. Jth Cav., June 25, '76.) Brevet Lt.-Col., October 19, 1864, for industry, zeal, and faithful services. Brevet Col., April 15, 1865, for faithful and meritorious service during the war. OTIS, ELWELL S. (Lt.-Col. zzd Inf., July 28, '66.) (Lt.-Col. zzd Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet Col., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Spottsylvania, Va. TO THE PRESENT TIME. 485 OTIS, GEORGE A. [Assf. Surg., Feb. 28, '66.) {Asst. Surg., Feb. 28, '66.) Brevet Capt. and Brevet Maj., September 29, i865, for faithful and merit- orious service in the Medical Department. Brevet Lt.-Col., September 29, 1866, for faithful and meritorious service during the war. OVERTON, GILES B. {papt. lifh Inf., May 14, '61.) (Capt. l^th Inf., May 14, '61.) Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service during the war. OVERTON, WALTER H. [\st Lt. fth Inf., May 3 '08.) {Maj. yd Rifles, Feb. 21, '14.) Brevet Lt.-Col., December 23, 1814, for gallant conduct at siege of New Orleans, La. OWENS, WESLEY. [?dLt. tfh Cav., July I, '56.) {Capt. ^th Cav., Jan. 15, '62.) Brevet Maj., May 27, 1S63, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Hanover Court House, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service during the war. PAGE, CHARLES. (Asst Surg., Dec. 2, '51.) (Surg., (Maj.) Apl. 16, '62.) Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious service during ihe war. PAGE, JOHN. (2dLt. %thlnf., Feb., 13, '18.) (Capt. ifh Inf., Apl. 30, '31.) Brevet Capt., January i, 1829, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. PAGE, JOHN H. (2dLt yilnf, Aug. 5, '61.) (Capt. -^d Inf., May 6, '64.) Brevet Capt., December,^i3, 1862, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Fredericksburg, Va. Brevet Maj , July 2, 1863, for gallant and mer- itorious service at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. PAGE, FRANCIS N. (Bvt. 2dLt ytk Inf., July i, '41.) (A. A. G. [Bvt. Capt.), May 13, '47.) Brevet ist Lt., May 9, 1846, for gallant conduct in defence of Fort Brown Tex. Brevet Maj., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Contreras and Churubusco. PAINE, J. C. (Capt Sig. Corps, Mar. 3, '63.) (Capt Sig. Corps, Mar. 3, '63.) Brevet Maj., August i, 1864, for gallant and meritorious service in the bat- tles of the campaign from Rapidan to Petersburg. PALFREY, JOHN C. (Bvt. 2dLt Engrs., July 1, '57.) (Capt. Engrs., Mar. 3, '63.) Brevet Maj., August 23, 1864, for meritorious and distinguished service dur- ing the sieges of Forts Gaines and Morgan, Ala. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 26, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service at the siege of Mobile, Ala. Brevet Col., March 26, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service during the war. Breyet Brig.rGen., March 26, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service during the war. . -. ,■ , .... ..-.■. ' 486 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 FAUVtER, ALFHEUS T. \zd Lt. 9*4 Inf., April 9, '47.) (\st Lt. i^h Inf., Dec. — , '47.) Brevet ist Lt., August 20, 1847, f°r gallant and meritorious conduct in the battles of Contreras and Churubusco. PALMER, EUGENE R. (istLt. ityllnf., July 28, '65.) [ist Lt. ^-^d Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet Capt, March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious conduct at the bat- tle of Cedar Mountain, Va. FALMER, INNIS N. (Bvt 2dLt, Mtd. Rifles July I, '46.) (Col. 2.d Cav., June 9, '68.) Brevet 1st Lt., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Contreras and Churubusco. Brevet Capt., September 13, 1847, for gallant conduct at Chapultepec. Brevet Lt.-Col., July 21, i86l, for gallant and merit- orious service at Bull Run, Va. Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service during the Rebellion. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service in the field during the Rebellion. PALMER, JAMES. {yi Lt. z^k Inf., April 30, ' 13.) (ist Lt. 2^h Inf., Aug. 5, '14.) Retained, May, 181 5, as 2d Lt. 2d Inf. (under reorganization made under Act of March 3, 1815) with Brevet of ist Lt. from August 5, 1814. PALMER, WILLIAM R. {2dLt. Top Engrs., July 7, '38.) \Ma.j. Top Engrs., Sept. 9, '61.) Brevet Lt.-Col., October 20, 1861. No service specified in nomination or commission. Brevet Col., May 5, 1862, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Williamsburg, Va. PARKE, JOHN B. (\st Lt. \-jth Inf., May 14, '61.) (Capt. loth Inf., July 14, '64.) Brevet Maj., August i, 1864, for gallant service at the battle of Spottsylvania, Va., and during the operations before Richmond. Brevet Lt.-Col., April 2, 1865, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Fort Steadman, and in the assault on Fort Sedgwick, Va. PARSE, JOHN G. (Bvt. zd Lt. Top Engrs., July i, '49.) (Maj. Engrs., June 17. '64.) Brevet Lt.-Col., April 26, 1862, for gallant and meritorious service at the capture of Fort Macon, N. C. Brevet Col., July 12, 1863, for gallant and meri- torious service at the capture of Jackson, Miss. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service in the defence of Knoxville, Tenn. Bvt. Maj.-Genl., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service in the re- pulse of Fort Steadman, Va. PARKER, CHARLES. (zd Lt. <)th Cav., July, 28, '66.) (Capt. <)th Cav.. Jan. 16, '70.) Brevet ist Lt. and Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Nashville, Tenn. PARKER, DAINGERFIELD. (zd Lt. 3d Inf., Apl. 26, '6i.) (Capt. 3.) Brevet Maj., April 18, 1847, fo"^ gallant and meritorious conduct in the bat- tle of Cerro Gordo. PENROSE, VTILLIAM H. (2dLt. T,d Inf., April 1 3, '6 1 . ) ( Capt. -^d Inf., Sept. tj, '63.) ' Brevet Capt., May 3, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Marye's Heights, Va. Brevet Maj., July 2, 1863, for gallant and merit- orious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Lt.-Col., May 5, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of the Wilderness, Va. Bre- vet Col., October 19, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Cedar Creek, Va. Brevet Brig-Gen., April 9, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services in the field during the war. PENTLAND, JOHN. (Capt. 22dlnf., April 2°, '12.) (Capt. 22d Inf., April 2,0, '12.) Brevet Major, July 25, 1814, for gallant conduct at the battle of Niagara. PERIN, GLOVER. (Asst. Surg., Dec. 4, '47.) (Surg. (Maj.), May 2i, '61.) Brevet Lt.-Col, March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war, PERKINS, BENJAMIN R. (ist Lt. 12th Inf., May 14, '61.) (Capt. 12th Inf., July 17, '63.) Brevet Capt., August 9, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Cedar Mountain, Va. Brevet Major, July i, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. PERRAX7LT, PAUL H. ( Top. Engr. [Maj.), April 12, '13. J \ Disbanded June 15, 'l2. Top. > (Top. Engr. (Maj.), Feb. 17, '17.) ( En^r., Feb. 17, '17. ) Brevet Lt.-Col., February 17, 1827, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. TO THE PRESENT TIME. 49I PBHRY, ALEXANDER J. [Bvt. 2dLt. id Arty., July i, '51.) {Dep. Q. M. G. (Lt.-Col.), Mar. 3, '75.) Brevet Maj., Brevet Lt.-Col., Brevet Col., and Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865,' for faithful and meritorious services in the Quartermaster's Department during the war. PERRY, FRANK "W. (2dLt. nth Inf., June 9, '62.) [Capt. \Afh Inf., July g, '66.) Brevet Capt., August i, 1864, for gallant services at the battle of the Wil- derness, Va. Brevet Maj., August 18, 1864, for gallant services at the battle on the Weldon R. R., Va. PERRY, DAVID. {id Lt. \st Cav., Mar. 24, '62.) (Caft. 1st Cav., Nov. 12, '64.) Brevet Maj., April I, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Five Forks, Va. Brevet' Lt.-Col., December 26, i866, for gallantry in an engagement vfith a large band of Indians on the Owhyhee River, L T., Dec. 26, 1866. .Brevet Col., April 5, 186S, for gallantry in an engagement with a large band of Indians on the Malheur River, Oregon, April 5, 1868. PERRY, ROBERT C. (istLt. i2dlnf., Jan. 22, '67.) (ist Lt. ifld Inf., Jan. 22, '67.) Brevet Capt, March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the bat- tle of the Wilderness, Va. Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and merit- orious services at the battle of Spottsylvania, Va. PETERNELL, CHARLES. [2d Lt.i'tfk Inf., April I), '47.) (ist IJ. itfA Inf., Aug. — , '47.) Brevet Capt, September 13, 1847, ^°'^ gallant and meritorious conduct at the battle of Chapultepec. PETERS, DE "WITT C. [AssUSurg., Aug. 15, '54.) {Surg. {Maj) July 28, '66.) Brevet Maj. and Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and merit- orious services during the war. PETTEE, LEMUEL. {zdLt. nth Inf, Sept. 25, '62.) (Capt. 2!)th Inf., N&v. 2, '67.) Brevet ist Lt., July 2, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Captain, March 13, 1865, for gallant and merit- orious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. PHELPS, JOHN E. (2dLt 2d Cav., June II, '62.) (1st Lt. ^d Cav., Oct. 1, '63.) Brevet Capt., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the Fall campaign of 1864 in South-western Missouri. Brevet Maj. and Brevet Lt-Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. PHILLIPS, CHARLES B. (1st Lt Engrs., June 13, '64.) [Capt. Engrs., Mar. 7, '67.) Brevet Capt., April g, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the operations resulting in the fall of Richmond, Va., and surrender of the insur- gent army under General Lee. 492 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 PHIPPS, FRANK H. {isi Zi. Ordn., yune II, '63.) »* {Capt. OrJn., jfune 23, '74.) Brevet Capt., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services in the Ordnance Department. PHISTERER, FREDERICK. (2jLe. iSeA Inf., Oct. 30, '61.) {Caft. \Zth Inf., Feb. 15, '66.) Brevet Capt., May 14, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battles of Mission Ridge, Tenn., and Resaca, Ga. • PIATT, BENJAMIN M. {2d Lt. AUth Inf., July 2, '67.) (2d Lt. /^h Inf., July 2, '67.) Brevet ist Lt., July 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in, the battle of Chancellorsville, Va. Brevet Capt., July 2, 1867, for gallant and merit- orious services in the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. PIATT, WILLIAM, (idlA. wth Inf., Mar. 2, 1799.) [Maj. 34i& Inf., Mar. 9, '14.) Brevet Lt.-Col., December 23, 1814, for gallant conduct at the siege of New Orleans. PICKETT, GEORGE E. (Bvt. zdLt. ith. Inf.. July 1, '46.) (Capt. tjtk Inf., Mar. 3, '55.) ^ Brevet ist Lt., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. Brevet Capt., September 13, 1847, for gallant con- duct at Chapultepec. PIERCE, BENJAMIN K. (\stLt. yl Arty., Mar. 12, '12.) (Lt.-Col. ist Arty., Mar. 19, '42.) Brevet Maj., October i, 1823, for 10 j'ears' faithful service in one grade. Brevet Lt.:Col.,.August 21, 1836, for distinguished service in the affair at Fort Drane. PIERCE, HENRY H. (2d Lt. 1st Inf., Oct. 16, '67.) (ist Lt. 2lst Inf., May 19, '74.) Brevet ist Lt., October 16. 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Petersburg Mine, Va. Brevet Capt., October 16, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in action at Grave Yard Bend. PIERCE, THOMAS P. (2d Lt. tjth Inf., April% '47.) (ist Lt. t)t/i Inf., Oct. — . '47.) Brevet ist Lt., August 20, 1847, ^o"" gallant and meritorious conduct in the battles of Contreras and Churubusco. FIBRE, HENRY D. (Maj. 44ti Inf., Aug. I, '13.) . (Maj. l,ifh Inf., Aug. i, '13." Brevet Lt.-Col., December 23, 1814, for gallant conduct at the siege of Nevi Orleans. PIKE, ZEBULON. (Capt. id Inf., Mar. 16, '92.) (Maj. 2^ Inf., Mar. 20, 1800.) Brevet Lt.-Col., July 10, 1812. No record. TO THE PRESENT TIME. 493 PIPER, ALEXANDER. {Bvt.2d Lt. yl Arty., July 3, '51.) [Maj. i^h Arty., Dec. 20, '75.) Brevet Maj., August 30, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services during the campaign in Northern Virginia. Brevet Lt.-Col., June 15, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services in action before Petersburg, Va. PIPER, JAMES "W. {\stLt. (fh Arty., May 14, '61.) I^Capt. t^th Arty., July 28, '(sd.) Brevet Capt., June 26, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Mechanicsville, Va. PITCHER, THOMAS G-. (Bvt. 2d Lt. ^th Inf., July, i, '45.) {Col. \st Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet ist Lt., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. Brevet Maj., August g, 1862, for gallant and merit- orious services at Cedar Mountain, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col. nd Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services in the field during the war. PLATT, EDWARD R. (Biit. 2dLt. yiArty., July i, '49.) {A. A. G. (Maj.), Mar. 6, '73.) Brevet Maj., July 21, 1861, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Bull Run, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., December 13, 1862, for gallant and merit- orious services at the battle of Fredericksburg, Va. PLEASANT'ON, ALFRED. [Bvt.'2dLt. 1st Drags., July 1, '44.) (Maj. 2d Cav., Feb. 15, '62.) Brevet ist Lt., May 9, 1846, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Palo Alto and Resaca de la Palma. Brevet Lt.-Col., September 17, :862, for gallant and meritorious services at Antietam, Md. Brevet Col., July 2, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services in the campaign against the Rebel General Price in Missouri. Brevet Maj.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services in the field duringi^^the war. PLEASANTS, CHARLES I. (ut Lt. nth. Inf., May 14, '6l.) (ist Lt. wth Inf., May 14, '6l.) Brevet Capt., May 5, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of the Wilderness, Va. PLYMPTON, JOSEPH. (2dLt. 4th Inf., Jan. 3, '12.) (Col. 1st Inf., June 9, '53.) Brevet Maj., June I, 1831, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. Brevet LoL, April i8, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct in the battle of Cerro Gordo. PLYMPTON, PETER W. L. (Bvt. 2d Lt. -jth Inf., July I, '47.) {Maj. lyth Inf., Dec. 3. '63.) Brevet Maj., February 21, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Valverde, N. M. Brevet Lt.-Col., April 15, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Peralta, N. M. 494 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 POE, ORLANDO M. [Bvt. 2d Lt. Top. Engrs., July i, '56.) [Maj. Engrs. Mar. 7, '67.) Brevet Maj., July 6, 1864, for gallant services in the siege of Knoxville. Brevet Lt.-Col., September i, 1864, for gallant services in the capture of At- lanta, Ga. Brevet Col., December 21, 1864, for gallant services in the capture of Savannah, Ga. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and merit- orious services in the campaign terminating with the surrender of General J. E. Johnston. POLAND, JOHN S. {2d Lt. 2d Inf., May 6, '61.) {^Capt. dth Inf., June 27, '62.) Brevet Maj., December 13, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Fredericksburg, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., May 3; 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of ChancellorsvUle, Va. POLAND, MARTIN L. [2d Lt. Ordn., June 13, '64.) (Capt. Ordn., June 23, '74.) Brevet ist Lt. and Brevet Capt., December 14, 1865, for faithful and meri- torious services. POMEROY, CHARLES C. (Capt. wth Inf., May 14, '61.) (Capt. 11th Inf., May 14, '61.) Brevet Maj , June 22, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services in the recruitment of the armies of the United States. Brevet Lt.-Col., November 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services in connection with the mustering out of service and disbanding of the Volunteer Army of the United States. POND, RICHARD H. [2d Lt. I2th Inf., May 25, '62.) [Capt. \2th Inf., April 5, '66.) Brevet Capt., August i, 1864, for gallant services at the battle of Bethesda Church, and during the campaign before Richmond. Brevet Maj.., April g, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the campaign terminating with the surrender of General Lee. POPE, DOUGLASS. [\st Lt. yjth Inf., July 28, '66.) (ist Lt. yjth Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the bat- tle of Grovetoii, Va. Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. POPE, JOHN. (Bvt. 2d Lt. Top. Engrs., July i, '42.) (Brig.-Cen., July 14, '62.) Brevet ist Lt., September 23, 1846, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Monterey. Brevet Capt., February 23, 1847, for gallant ^'^^ meritorious con- duct at Buena Vista. Brevet Maj.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meri- torious service in the capture of Island No. 10, on Mississippi River. PORTER, ANDREVST. (\st Lt. Mtd. Rifles, May 27, '46.) (Col. idth Inf., May 14, '61.) Brevet Maj., August 20, 1847, ^°^ gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. Brevet Lt.-Col., September 13, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Chapultepec. TO THE PRESENT TIME. 495 PORTER, A. PARKER. (2dlt. 2d Cav., July I, '56.) {Com. of Sub. [Capt], Aug. 3, '61.) Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. PORTER, DAVID E. (2dLt. 1st Arty., Oct. 24, '61.) (1st Lt. \st Arty., July 13, '62.) Brevet Capt., April 9. 1865, for meritorious service in campaign against the rebel army in Northern Virginia, commencing in front of Petersburg, March 29, 1865, and ending April 9, 1865. PORTER, FITZJOHN. [Bvt. 2dLt. ifh Arty., July 1, '45.) [Col. \t,th Inf., May 14, '61.) Brevet Capt, September 8, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Molino del Rey. Brevet Maj., September 13, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Chapultepec. Brevet Brig.-Gen., June 27, 1862, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Chickahominy, Va. PORTER, GILES. (idLt. Arty., Jtily 24, '18.) (Maj. ifh Arty., Feb. 16, '47) Brevet Capt., February i, 1833, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. PORTER, GEORGE L. (Asst. Sur^., July 17, '62.) (Asst. Surg.,July 17, '62.) Brevet Capt. and Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. PORTER, HORACE. (Bvt. 2d Lt. ofOrdn., July i, '60 ) (Maj. Ordn. Dept., Mar. 7, '67.) Brevet Capt., April 11, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the siege of Fort Pulaski, Ga. Brevet Maj., May 6, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of the Wilderness, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., August 16, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services in the action of New Market Heights, Va. Brevet Col., March 13,1865, for gallant and meritorious service.s during' the war. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services in the field during the war. PORTER. MOSES. (Lt. Arty., Sept. 29, 1789.) (Col. Lt. Arty., Mar. 12, '12.) Brevet Brig.-Gen., September 10, 1813, for distinguished services in the campaign of 1813. PORTER, ROBERT H. (istLt. \ifh Inf., Oct. 26, '61.) (Capt. ia,th Inf., Nov. 4, '65.) Brevet Maj., November 4, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services. PORTER, SAMUEL A. (2d Lt. \/^h Inf., May 1 1, '66. ) ( \st Lt. 44t/i Inf., Mar. 20, '67.) Brevet Capt., March 20, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Chickamauga, Ga. Brevet Maj., March 20, 1867, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. PORTER, IRW^IN "W. (\stLt. ie,t/i Inf., Sept. 11, '61.) (Capt. l^tk Inf., April 6, '65.) Brevet Capt., September i, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services during the Atlanta campaign. 49^ BREVETS CONFERilED FROM l8l2 PORTER, JABIES B. M. {Paymaster (.Ma/.), July 15, '64.) (Paymaster {Maj.), July 15, '64.) Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. POTTER, JOSEPH A. (istU. -Ltfh Inf., Sept. 27, '61.) (Q. M. (Maj.), Jan. 18, '67.) Brevet Maj., Brevet Lt.-Col,, Brevet Col., and Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. POTTER, JOSEPH H. {Bvt. 2dX't. 1st Inf., July i, '43.) {Col. zifh Inf., Dec. II, '73:) Brevet ist I,t., September 23, 1846, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Monterey. Brevet Lt.-Col., December 13, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Fredericksburg, Va. Brevet Col., May 3, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Chancellorsville, Va. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services in the cam- paign terminating with the surrender of Gen. Lee. - POUSSIN. W^ILLIAM TELL. {Asst. Tap. Engr. (Capt.), Mar. 6, '17.) ( Tsp. Engr. (Maj.), Jan. i;, '29.) Brevet Maj., March 6, 1827, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. POWELL, ALBERT M. {Bvt. 2d Lt. %th Inf, July I, '60.) (Capt. 13/^ /;;/, Oct. 24, '61.) Brevet Maj,, October 4, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Corinth, Miss. Brevet Lt.-Col., July 4, 1863, for gallant and merito- rious services during the siege of Vicksburg, Miss. PO'WELK JAMES. {2dLt. l8tA Inf., May 14, '61.) (Capt. \Zth Inf., Sept. c, '64.) Brevet Capt., September 20, 1863. for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Chickaniauga. Brevet Maj., September i, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services during the Atlanta campaign, and at the battle of Jones- boro, Ga. Brevet Lt.-Col., August 2, 1867, for gallant conduct in the fight with the Indians near Fort Philip Kearney, D. T., August 2, 1867. POW^ELL, JAMBS B. {2d Lt 1st Inf., June 7, '55.) (Capt. \st Inf., Jane 11, '61.) Brevet Capt., April 7, 1862, for gallant and meritorious servi<.«s at the battle of Shiloh, Tenn, ' YOVTEUL, WHilAM H. {2d Lt. ifh Inf., Oct. 24, '61.) - (Capt. s^h Inf., Feb. 2, '65.) Brevet Capt., September 17, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Antietam, Md. Brevet Maj.,' April 2, 1865, for gallant and meritori- ous services in front of Petersburg, Va. PO"WER, JOHN. {xd Lt. \^th Inf., Oct. 24, '61.) {Capt. 34M /«/, Feb. 11, '65.) Brevet Capt. and Brevet Maj., December 31, 1862, for gallant and meritori- ous services at the battle of Murfreesboro, Tenn. TO THE PRESENT TIME. 497 PRATT, HENRY C. (2d Li. I2,th Inf., May ii, '66.) (Capt. i^i/i Inf., June 20, '76.) Brevet ist Lt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Fair Oaks, Va. Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meri- torious services in the battle of Blackburn Ford, Va. PRATT, HENRY C. (2dLt. 2d Arty., July i, '37.) [Paymaster (Maj.), June 14, '61.) Brevet Capt., October 19, 1847, for gallant and meritor'ous conduct at Atlix- co, Mexico. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for faith. ul and meritorious ser- vices during the war. PRATT, JAMES P. {2dLt. \itk Inf., Feb. 19, '62.) [ist. Lt. wth Inf., May 10, '62.) Brevet Capt., May 29, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Bethesda Church, Va. PRATT, RICHARD H. [zd Lt. \ath Cav., Mar. 7, '67.) (1st Lt. loth Cav., July 31, '67.) Brevet ist Lt. and Brevet Capt., March 7, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. PRENTICE, SARTELL. (\stLt. \2th Inf., May 14, '61.) (Capt. \2th Inf., May lo, '64.) Brevet Maj., August i, 1864, for gallant services at the battle of the Wilder- ness, and during the campaign before Richmond, Va. PRESTON, ALBERT "W. (2dLt. 8t& Cav., Sept. 10, '67.) (\st Lt. %th Cav., Mar. i, '70.) Brevet ist Lt., September 10, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Gaines's Mills, Va. Brevet Capt., September 10, 1867, for gal- lant and meritorious services in the battle of Malvern Hill, Va. PRICE, WILLIAM R. (Maj. Zth Cav., July 28, '66.) (Maj. 8M Cav., July 28, '66.) Brevet Lt.-Col., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of the Five Forks, Va. Brevet Col., December 10, 1868, for gallant and meritorious service in an engagement with Indians in the vicinity of Walker's Springs, in the Aquarius Range, Arizona Ty.,- on the loth and 13th December, 186S. PRIMES, FREDERICK E. (Bvt. 2dLt. Engrs., July I, '50.) (Maj. of Engrs., June i, '63.) Brevet Maj., October 4, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Corinth, Miss. Brevet Lt.-Col., July 4, 1863, for gallant and meri- torious services during the siege of Vicksburg, Miss. Brevet Col., and Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. PRIME, NATHANIEL. (\st Lt. \ith Inf., May 14, '61.) (Capt. loth Inf., Aug. 9, '62.) Brevet Maj., August i, 1864, for gallant services at Spottsylvania. Brevet Lt.-Col., August I, 1864, for gallant services at the battle of the Wilderness, Va. 00* 498 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 PRINCE, HENRY. (Bvt. 2d Lt. ifh Inf., Sept. 18, '35.) [^Paymaster {Ma/.), Ma/zj, '55.) Brevet Capt., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. Brevet Maj., September 8, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Molino del Rev. Brevet Lt.-Col., August 9, 1862, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Cedar Mountain, Va. Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services in the field during the war. PRINCE, "WILLIAM. {2d Lt. Ordn.. Jan. 29, '64.) (Capt. Ordn., June 23, '74.) Brevet ist Lt. and Brevet Capt., March 31, 1865, for gallant and distin- guished services. PRINCE, •WILLIAM E. {2d Lt. 1st Inf., Atig. 1, '38.) (Maj. -^d Inf., New. 23, '61.) Brevet Capt., March 16, 184S, for gallant and meritorious conduct at the battle of Santa Cruz de Rosales, Mexico. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. PROCTOR, JOSEPH L. (\st Lt \%th Inf., May 14, '61.) {Capt iWi Inf., Jan. 15, '63.) Brevet Capt., December 31, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Murfreesboro, Tenn. PURINGTON, GEORGE A. (Capt. <)th Cav., July 28, '66.) (Capt. gt/i Cav., July 28, '66.) Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of 'he Wilderness, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meri- torious services at the battle of Winchester, Va. Brevet Col., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Cedar Creek, Va. PUTNAM, HENRY R. {Capt. \2th Inf., Aug. 5, '6i.) {Capt \zth Inf., Aug. 5, '61.) Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the riots in New York city, in July, 1863. PUTNAM, HALDIMAND S. {Bvt 2d Lt. Top. Engrs., July i, '57.) (Capt. Engrs., Mar. 3, '63.) Brevet Maj., July 21, 1861, for gallant and meritorious services in the Man- assas campaign. Brevet Lt.-Col., July 10, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the descent upon Morris Island, S. C. Brevet Col., July 18, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the assault of Fort Wagner, S. C, where he was killed. PUTNAM, JAMES E. {zdLt. \2th Inf., Aug. 10, '63.) {Capt. 12th Inf., Feb. 22, '69.) Brevet Capt., May 5, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of the Wilderness, Va. PYNE. CHARLES M. {2d Lt dth Inf., Aug. 5, '61.) (Capt. ifld Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet ist Lt., August 30, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the tattle of Bull Run (2d), Va. Brevet Capt., January 23, 1865. No service givgn in nomination or commission. To THE PRESENT TIME. 499 QUIMBY, WILLIAM M. [Caft. \zth Inf., Aug. 5, '61.) (Capt. \zth Inf., Aug, 5, '61.) Brevet Maj., August g, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Cedar Mountain, Va. QUINN, THOMAS F. {id Lt. ^k Inf., Oct. 31, '63.) Capt. i^Ii Inf., Jan. 10, '76.) Brevet Capt., April 2, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services in front of Petersburg, Va. QUIRK, PAUL. [2dLt. 2d Cav., July 17, '62.) (ist Lt. 2d Cav., Feb, 13, '64.) Brevet ist Lt., September 17, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services during the Maryland campaign, lirevpt Capt., June 9, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Beverley Ford, Va. Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. QUITMAN, JOHN A. [Bri^.-Gen. U. S. Vols., July i, '46.) (Maj.-Gen. U. S. A , April 14, '47.) Brevet Maj.-Gen., U. S. A., September 23, 1846, for gallant and meritorious conduct in the battle of Monterey, Mexico. (See narrative, p. 191.) RAINS, G-ABRIEL J. {zdLt. Jth Inf., July i, '27.) (Lt.-Col. tfh Inf., June 5, '60.) Brevet Maj., April 28, 1840, for gallant and meritorious conduct in action ■with Seminole Indians, near Fort King, Fla. ^ RAINS, GBOR&E W. (zdLt. Engrs., July i, '42.) (Capt. ifh Arty., Feb. 14, '56.) Brevet Capt., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras aivi Churubusco. Brevet Maj., September 13, 1847, for gallant conduct at Chapultepec. RAMSAY, GEORGE D. (2dLt. Light Arty., July i, '20.) (Chf of Ordn. [B. G.), Sept. 75, '6j. ) Brevet Maj., September 23, 1846, for gallant and meritorious conduct 1, Monterey. Brevet Maj.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for long and faithful service 1,1 the army. RAMSAY, GEORGE D. Jr. {2d Lt. \st Arty., June 11, '63.) {Capt. of Ordn., June 23, '74.) Brevet Capt., March 13, 1865, for meritorious ^service in the Ordnance Department during the war. RAMSAY, JOSEPH G. {2dLt. 2d Arty., Aug. 5, '61.) {Capt. 2d Arty., Feb. 5, '67.) Brevet Capt., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. RAMSAY, WILLIAM R. {Asst. Surg., Aug. j, '61.) {Asst. Surg., Aug. 5, '61.) Brevet Capt. and Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious service during the war. 500 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 RANDALL, BURTON. {Assi. Surg., Oct. ii„ '32.) {Sttrg. (Maj.), July 7, '38.) Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. RANDALL, GEORGE M. (2dLt. 4t/i Inf., Oct. 24, '6i.) {.Capt. zyl Inf., Sept. 23, '65.) Brevet Capt., September 17, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Antietam, Md. Brevet Maj., April 2, 1805, for gallant and meritori- ous services in front of Petersburg, Va. RANDALL, THOMAS. [zd It. li^h Itif, Mar. 12, '12.) ^Capt. 14/^ Inf., Dec I, '14 ) Retained in the re-organization of 1815, under the act of March 3, 1815, as 1st Lt. of Arty., with brevet of Capt., from December i, 1814. RANDOL, ALANSON M. (Bvt. zd It. 4t/i Arty., July i, '60.) (Capt. ist Arty., Oct. 11, '62.) Brevet Capt., June 30, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services in the action at New Market, Va. Brevet Maj., July 3, 1863, for gallant and merito- rious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Five Forks, Va. Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. RANDOLPH, EDWARD B. {Ens. 20th Inf., May 15, 'i2.) (Paymaster, Mar. 28, '16.) Brevet isl Lt., July 25, 1814, for gallant conduct at the battle of Niagara. RANDOLPH, JOHN F. (Assi. Surg., D:c. 24, '55 ) (Surg. (Maj.), Aug. 27, '62.) Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. RANDOLPH, WALLACE F. (zd It. t,th. Arty., May 14, '61.) (Capt. ifh Arty., July 28, '66.) Brevet Capt, June 14, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at Win- chester, Va. Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for good conduct and gallant ser- vices during the war. RANKIN, W^ILLLAM G. (Capt. 13M Inf., May 14, '6:.) (Capt. lyt/i Inf., May 14, '61.) Brevet Maj., and Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful services during the war. RANSOM, DUNBAR R. (2d It. 2d Arty., June 7, '55.)., (Capt. yi Arty., AW. i, '61.) Brevet Maj., December 13, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Fredericksburg, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., July 3, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Col., August 25, 1S64, for gallant and meritorious services in action at Kearneysville, Va. RANSOM, HYATT C. (2d It. Mtd. Rifles, July I, '51.) (Dep. Q. M. Gen. (It.-CoL), June 6, '72.) Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. TO THE PRESENT TIME. SOI RANSOM, OWEN. (Cornet 1st Light Drags., Sept. 14, »i 2.) ( Capt. 2d In/., Jan. 25, '23.) Brevet Maj., January 25, 1833, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. RAPHALL, ALFRED M. {2dLt. i,ldlnf., Jan. 22, '67.) (\st Lt. \ith Inf., Dec. 30 '71.) Brevet ist Lt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. RATHBONE, HENRY R. [Capt. \2th Inf., May 14, '61.) [Maj. t,i/t Inf., Feb. 22, '69.) Brevet Maj., August i, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services in the bat- tles of the campaign from the Rapidan to Petersburg. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for meritorious services in the oiBce of the Provost Marshal of the United States. Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious ser- vices connected with the organization of the volunteer arniies of the United States during the war. RAULSTON, GEORGE F. (2dLt. loth Cav., July 28, '66 ) (1st Lt. 10th Cav., July 31, '67.) Brevet ist Lt. and Brevet Capt., .March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle on the Weldon R. R., Va. RAWLBS, JACOB B. (2dLt 2d Arty., May 6, '61.) (Capt. ^th Arty., July 28, '66.) Brevet Capt. July 8. 1863, for gallant and meritorious services during the siege of Port Hudson, La. Brevet Maj., April 9, l865, for gallant and meritorious services during the campaign terminating with the surrender of General Lee. RAWLINS, JOHN A ( Chief of Staff to Lt.-Gen., (Brig.- I ( Chief of Staff to Lt.-Gen. (Brig.- I I Gen), April 9, '65. 1 ( Gen.), April 9, '65. f Brevet Maj.-Gen., April g, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the campaign terminating with the surrender of the insurgent army under General Lee. RAYNOLDS, WILLIAM F. (BvtzdLt-lth Inf., July \,'6,-i,.] (Lt.-Col. Engrs., Mar. ■], 'St.) Brevet Lt.-Col. and Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and merito- rious services during the war. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for merito- rious services in the field during.the. war. - , RECTOR, STEPHEN. (Zd Lt Rangers, Aug. 1, '13.) (-^d Lt. Rangers, Aug. i, '13.) Brevet 2d Lt., July 13, 1814. No service specified in the commission. REDMOND, NICHOLAS. (2d Lt. ifh Arty., Aug. 10, '63.) (\st Lt. Afh Arty., Aug. 31, '64.) Brevet Ist Lt., September 20, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Chickamauga, Ga. Brevet Capt., March 13, 1865, for good con- duct and gallant services during the war. 502 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 READ, EDWIN VT. H. [zdLt. %th Inf., June 27, '56.) [,Capt. %th Inf., Oct. 26, '61.) Brevet Maj., July 2, 1863, -for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. READ, JOHN 6. {,Capt. \2th Inf, May 14, '61.) [Capt. 12th Inf., May 14, '61.) Brevet Maj., August 30, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Bull Run (2d), Va. REED, HORATIO B. {zd Lt. e,th Arty., May 14, '61.) (ist Lt. tfh Arty., Sept. 19, %i.) Brevet ist Lt., July 21, 1861, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Bull Run, Va. Brevet Capt., July i, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services during the Peninsula campaign in Virginia. Brevet Maj , October 14, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Bristow Station, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. REESE, CHATJNCEY B. {Bvt. id Lt. Engrs., July i, '59.) (Maj. Engrs., Mar. 7, '67.) Brevet Maj., Brevet Lt.-Col., and Brevet Col., December 21, 1864, for gal- lant and distinguished services during the campaign through Georgia and end- ing in the capture of Savannah, Ga. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the campaigns in Georgia and the Carolinas. . • REEVE, ISAAC V. D. {.Bvt. zdLt. i^h Inf., July i, '35.) (Col. lyh Inf, Oct. 14, '64.) Brevet Maj., August 20, 1847, for gallant conduct at Contreras and Churu- busco. Brevet Lt.-Col., September 8, 1847, for gallant and meritorious con- duct at Molino del Key. BrevSt Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. REEVES, THOMAS H. (Capt. 29t/t Inf., July 28, '66.) (Capt. yjlh Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet Maj. and Brevet Lt.-Col., March 2, 1867, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. REID, JOHN. (Ens. 1st Inf., April 21, '06.) (Capt. i,i,th Inf., July 15, '14.) Brevet Maj., December 23, 1814, for gallant conduct at the siege of New Orleans. REILLY, JAMES W. (\st Lt. Ordn. June II, '63.) (Capt. Ordn. June 23, '74.) Brevet Capt., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services in the campaign of December, 1864, including the battles of Franklin and Nashville. REILLY, TERRENCB. (Bvt. zd Lt. 2d Arty., Feb. 19, '63.) (xst Lt. ifh Arty., July 18, '64.) Brevet Capt. and Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. TO THE PRESENT TIME. 5O3 RENDLHBROCK, JOSEPH. (2ii Zt. i,th Cav., Nov. 29, '62.) (Capt. ifh Cav., Aug. 13, '67.) Brevet ist Lt., May 10, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services in the cav- alry action at Franklin, Tenn. Brevet Capt., October 4, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services in action at McMinnville, Tenn. Brevet Maj., April 2, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the capture of Selma, Ala. RENO, JESSE L. [Bvt. zdLt. Ordn., July l, '46.) (Capt. Ordn., July i, '60.) Brevet ist Lt., April 18, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Cerro Gordo. Brevet Capt., September 13, 1847, ^°^ gallant and meritorious con- duct at Chapultepec. , RENO, MARCUS A. (Bvt. 2dLt. 1st Drags., July i, '57.) (Maj. ytk Cav., Dec. 26, '68.) Brevet Maj., March 17, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services in action at Kelly's Ford, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., October 19, 1864, for gallant and merit- orious services at the battle of Cedar Creek, Va. Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. REYNOLDS, CHARLES A. (2dLt. tjth Inf., Mar. 3, '55.) (Q. M. (Maj.), Mar. 3, '75.) Brevet Maj. and Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. REYNOLDS, JOHN F. (Bvt. 2dLt. 2d Arty., July i, '41.) (Col. tfh Inf., June I, '(^t,:) Brevet Capt., September 23, 1846, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Monterey. Brevet Maj., February 23, 1847, for gallant and meritorious con- duct at Buena Vista. REYNOLDS, JOSEPH J. (Bvt. 2d Lt. ifh Arty., July i, '43.) (Col. 3a' Cav., July 28, '66.) Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Chickamauga, Ga. Brevet Maj.-Gen., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Missionary Ridge, Tenn. REYNOLDS, THOMAS. (2dLt. \%th Inf., Mar. 12, '12.) (ist Lt. \%th Inf., Mar. 13, '13.) Retained, January 1, 1816 (in reorganization under the Act of March 3, 1815), as 2dLt. of Artillery, with brevet of 1st Lt. from March 13, 1813. RHETT, THOMAS G. (Bvt. 2dLt. Ordn., July i, '35.) (Paymaster (Maj.), April T, '58.) Brevet Capt., October 12, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct in de- fense of Puebla. RICE, EDMUND. (\st Lt. ifith Inf., July 28, '66.) \ist Lt. ^h Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the bat- tle of Antietam, Md. Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 2, 1867, for gallmt and meritorious services at the battle of the Wilderness, Va. 504 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM 1 8 12 RICE, FRANK R. {2d Lt. i,ifh Inf., July 28, '66.) (\st Lt. 44tA Inf., June 5, '67.) Brevet ist Lt. and Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle o£ Fredericksburg, Va. RICE, JAMES H. {id Lt. s,ifh Inf., Jan. 22, '67.) {ut Lt. \lth Inf., Dec. 31, '72.) Brevet ist Lt., March 2, 1867, for gallantry in action in front of Richmond, June 25, 1862. Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for meritorious services during the war. RICHARDS, WILLIAM V. {2dLt. iit/i Inf., May 11, '66.) (ist Lt. i6th Inf., June 19, '68.) Brevet ist Lt, March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of South Mountain, Md. Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Spottsylvania, Va. RICHARDSON, ISRAEL B. (Bvt 2dLt. yl Inf., July i, '41.) {Capt. idlnf, Mar. 5, '51.) Brevet Capt., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. Brevet Maj., September 13, 1847, f°"^ gallant and meritorious conduct at Chapultepec. RICKETTS, JAMES B. {id Lt 1st Arty., July i, '39.) {Maj. 1st Arty., June i, '63.) Brevet Lt.-Col., July 21, 1861, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Bull Run, Va. Brevet Col., June 3, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Cool Arbor, Va. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Cedar Creek, Va. Brevet Maj.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services in the field during the war. RIDDLE, DAVID. {id Lt lifh Inf., April 9, '12.) {Capt Zth Inf., Dec. 3, '16.) Brevet Capt., July 25, 18T4, for gallant conduct at the battle of Niagara. Brevet Maj., September 17, 1814, for gallant conduct in the sortie from Fort Erie. RIDDLE, SAMUEL. (Cornet ist Light Drags., May 20, '13.) (Capt. %th Inf., April 11, '19.) Brevet 2d Lt., September 17, 1814, for gallant conduct in the sortie from Fort Erie. RIDGBLY, RANDOLPH. (Id Lt. zdArty., July 1, '37.) {A. A. G. {Hvt Capt.\ Julyy, '46.) Brevet Capt., May 9, 1846, for gallant and distinguished conduct at Palo Alto and Resaca de la Palma. RIDGELY, SAMUEL C. (Bvt id Lt ifh Arty., July 1, '31.) (Capt. i,th Arty., Feb. 16, '47.) Brevet Maj., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. TO THE PRESENT TIME. SOS RIFE, JOSEPH B. {2d Lt. (>th Inf., Aug. 5, '61.) » (Capt. 6lh Inf., Nov. 7, '65.) Brevet Capt., September 17, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services a the battle of Antietam, Md. RIGGS, JOHN. [Ens. Rangers, Mar. 26,' n.) , {2t/ Zi. Rangers, yiify 1 2, '14.) Brevet 3d Lt., July 13, 1814. No service specified in the commission. RILEY, BENNETT. (Eiis. Rifles, Jan. 19, '13.) (Col. 1st Inf., Jan. 31, '50.) Brevet Maj., August 6, 1828, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade- Brevet Col., June 2, 1840, for bravery, good conduct, &c., at the battle of Chako- chatta, Fla., &c. Brevet Brig.-Gen., April 18, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct in the battle of Cerro Gordo. Brevet Maj. -Gen., August 20, 1847, for gallant conduct at Contreras. RINGGOLD, SAMUEL. [2dLt. Arty. July 24, '18.) (Capt. yl Arty., Aug. 31, '36.) Brevet Capt., M-ay8, 1832, for to years' faithful services in one grade. Brevet Maj., February 15, 1838, for meritorious conduct, and activity and efficiency in war against the Florida Indians. RIPLEY, BOSW^ELL S. (But. 2dLt. ylArty:, July i, '43.) [ist Lt. ^d Arty., Mar. 3, '47:) Brevet Capt., April 18, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct in the bat- tle of Cerro Gordo, Mexico. Brevet Maj., September 13, 1847, ^°^ gallant and meritorious conduct in thg battle of Chapultepec. RIPLEY, ELEAZER "W. (Lt.-Col. 2istlnf., Mar. 12, '12.) (Brig-Gen. April 15, '14.) Brevet Maj.-Gen., June 25, 1814, for gallant conduct at the battle of Niagara. RIPLEY, JAMES "W. (idLt. of Arty., June i, '14.) (Chief of Ordn. (Brig.-Gen.), Aug. 3, '61.) Brevet Lt.-Col., May 30, 1848, for meritorious conduct, particularly in per- forming his duty in the prosecution of war with Mexico. Brevet Brig.-Gen. July 2, 1861. No service specified in commission. BrevSt Maj.-Gen., March '3> '865, for long and faithful services in the army. RITTENHOUSE, BENJAMIN F. (2dLt tfh Arty., May 14, '61.) (Capt. i,th Arty., Jan. 5, '70.) _ Brevet Capt., August i, 1864, for gallant services at the battle of Bethesda Church, Va., and during the campaign before Richmond, Va. Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for good conduct and gallant services during the war. RITTER, JOHN F. (2dU. 5M Inf., July I, '56.) (Capt. \tfh Inf., Oct 24, '61.) Brevet Maj., March 28, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the bat- tle of Apache Canon, N. M. Brevet Lt.-Col., September 10, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the capture of Little Rock, Ark. S06 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 RIVES, ■WRIGHT. (2d Lt. 6th Inf., May 6, '6i.) (Capt. 6t/i Inf., Feb. 23, '64.) Brevet IVTaj. and Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and merit- orious services during the advance upon Corinth and at the siege of Vicksburg, Miss. ROACH, ISAAC Jr. (2dLt. 2d Arty., July 2, '12.) (Capt. z-^d Inf., April 13, '13.) Brevet Maj., April 13, 1823, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. ROBBINS, KENELM. (zd Lt. ifh Cav., yum u, '63.) (Capt. s,tfh Inf., Jan. 22, '67.) . Brevet ist Lt., August i, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Brandy Station, Va. Brevet Capt., September 19, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battleof Winchester, Va. ROBBINS, RICHARD. (2d Lt. nth Inf., June 27, '62.) (Capt. y)th Inf., Jan. 22, '67.) Brevet ist Lt., July 2, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Capt., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious erevices at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. ROBERDEAIT, ISAAC. ( Top. Engr. (MaJ.), April 29, '13.) ( Top. Engr. (M.ij.), April 2% '13.) Brevet Lt.- Col., April 29, 1823, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. ROBERTS, BENJAMIN S. (Bvt. 2d Lt. \st Drags., July i, '35.) (Lt.-Col. ^d Cav., July 28, '66.) Brevet Maj., September 13, 1847, for gallant and "meritorious conduct at Chapultepec. Brevet Lt.-Col., November 24, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Matamoras and the Pass of Gualaxara, Mexico. Brevet Col., Feb. ruary 21', 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at Valverde, N. M. Brevet Brig.-Get(., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at Cedar Moun- tain, Va. ROBERTS, CYRUS S. (2d Lt. i-]th Inf., May 11, '66.) (\st Lt. lyth Inf., Sept. 18, '67.) Brevet ist Lt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Winchester, Va., September 19, 1864. Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Fisher's Hill, Va. ROBERTS, JOSEPH. (Bvt. 2dLt. ifh Arty., July I, '35.) (Lt.-Col 4th Arty., Aug. 11, '63.) Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for meritorious and distinguished ser- vices during the war. ROBERTSON, JAMES M. (Bvt. 2dLt. 2d Arty., June 28, '48.) (Maj. 3^ Arty., June 17, '74.) Brevet Maj., June 27, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gaines's Mills, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., July 3, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Col., May 31, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Cold Harbor, Va. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for distinguished services while Chief of Horse Artillery TO THE PRESENT TIME. 507 attached to the cavalry corps of the Armv of the Potomac during the campaign from May to August, 1864, including the battles of the Wilderness, Cold Har- bor, Hawes' Shop, and Trevilian Station. ROBINETT, HENRY C. (2dLt. 1st Inf., Aug. 5, '61.) (Capt. 1st Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet Capt., October 4, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Corinth, Miss. Brevet Maj., July 4, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services during the siege of Vicksburg, Miss. ROBINSON, AUGUSTUS G. [,Bvt. 2dLt. 4th Arty., July i, '57.) (A. Q. M. (Capt.), Feb. 19. '63.) Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. ROBINSON, FREDERICK, {id Lt. tfh Arty., Oct. 30, '62.) (\st Lt. tfh Arty., July 28, '66.) Brevet ist Lt., June 3, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the bat- tle of Cool Arbor, Va. Brevet Capt., October 19, 1864, for gallant and merit- orious services at the battle of Cedar Creek, Va. ROBINSON, JOHN C. {2d Li. ^th Inf., Oct. 27, '39.) (Col. i,T,d Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet Lt.-Col., July i, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the bat- tle of Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Col., May 5, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of the Wilderness, Va. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Spottsylvania, Va. Brevet Maj.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services in the field during the war. ROBINSON, SOLOMON S. (Capt. idth Inf., May 14, '61.) (Capt. 161/1 Inf., May 14, '61.) Brevet Maj., September i, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services durin;^ the Atlanta campaign, Ga. ROCK"WELL, A. P. (A. Q. M. (Capt.) Jan. 18, '67.) (A. Q. M. (Capt.), Jan. 18, '67.) Brevet Maj. and Brevet Lt.-Col., March 2, 1867, forfaithful and meritorious services during the war. ROCKWELL, CHARLES F. (istLt. Ordn. Dep., June 11, %y) (^st Lt. Ordn. Dep., June 11, '63.) Brevet Capt., March 13, 1865, for meritorious services in the Ordnance De- partment. RODENBOUGH, T. F. ■ (idLt. id Drags., Mar. 27, '61.) (Maj. ifld Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet Maj., September 19, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services in the battles of Trevillian Station and Opequan, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, f°'' .gallant and meritorious services during the war. Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Todd's Tavern, Va. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Cold Harbor, Va. 5o8 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 RODER, JOHN W. (Bvt. 2d Lt. 2d Arty., Oct. 22, '62.) (ist Lt. ifh Arts., July 11, '64.) Brevet Capt., October 27, 1864, for distinguished services at the battle of Boydton Plank Road, Va. Brevet Maj.. April 6, 1865, for gallant and merit- orious services at the battle of Sailor's Creek, Va. RODMAN, THOMAS J. [Bvt. za Lt. Ordii., July i, '41.) (Lt.-Col. Ordn., Mar. 7, '67.) Brevet Lt.-Col., Brevet Col., and Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for faithful, meritorious, and distinguished services in the Ordnance Department. RODNEY, GEORGI! B. {zdLt. i,th Arty., Aug. 5, '61.) {Capt. i^h Arty., Mar. 4, '69.) Brevet Capt, December 31, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Stone River, Tenn. Brevet Maj., September 20, 1863, for gal- lant and meritorious services' at the battle of Chickamauga, Ga. ROGERS, "WILLIAM W. (\st Lt. A,lth Inf., July 28, '66 ) [1st. Lt. gth Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the bat- tle of Gettysburg, Pa. ROLAND, JOHN F. [Bvt. 2d Lt. 2d Arty., July i, '36.) (Capt. zd Arty., Mar. 3, '47.) Brevet Capt., May 9, 1846, for gallant and meritorious conduct in the bat- tles of Palo Alto and Resaca de la Palma. Brevet Maj., September 23, 1846, for gallant and meritorious conduct in the battle of Monterey, Mexico. ROLLINS, JAMES H. (Bvt. 2d Lt. ifh Arty., June 17, '62.) (Capt. Ordn., July 5, '67.) Brevet Capt., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious service in the Ordnance Department. ROMEYN, HENRY. (1st Lt. yjtli Inf., Jan. 22, '67.) (ist Lt. tfh Inf., Jan. 22, '67.) Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service in the battle of Nashville, Tenn. ROOT, CHESTER. (2d Lt. Arty., April 25, '12.) (Capt. Arty., Mar. 5, '19.) Brevet Capt, September li, 1814, for gallant conduct at the battle of Platts- burg. ROSE, THOMAS E. (Capt. 11th Inf., July 28, '66.) (Capt. 16th Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service in the bat- tle of Liberty Gap, Tenn. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service in the battle of Chickamauga, Ga. ROSECRANS, "W. S. (Bvt. 2d Lt. Engrs., July i, '42.) (Brig.-Gen., May 16, '61.) Brevet Maj.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and distinguished service at the battle of Stone River, Tenn. TO THE PRESENT TIME. 509 ROSECSANXS, MORTIMER. (Bvt. 2dLt. ifh Inf., July I, \\.f [ist Lt. e,t/i Inf., July 10, '46.) Brevet Capt., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct in the battles of Contreras and Churubusco. ROSS, RICHARD H. [Bvt. 2dLt. ^th Inf., July i, '30.) [Capt. yt/i Inf., Nov. 26, '41.) Brevet Maj., September 23, 1846, for gallant and meritorious conduct in the battle of Monterey. Brevet Lt.-Col., August 20, 1847, for gallant and merit- orious conduct in the battle of Contreras. ROSS, SAMUEL. [Bvt. 2dLt. zd Inf., June 2%, '48.) [Maj. 2%th Inf., JuU 8, '63.) Brevet Maj., May 3, 1863, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Chancellorsville, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., December 13, 1864, for gallant and meritorious service during the Atlanta and Savannah campaigns. Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for gallantry and ability as a brigade commander during the Savannah campaign. ROSSELL, NATHAN B. [2dLt. tfh Inf., Aug. i, '38.) [Maj. yl Inf., Sept, 25, '61.) Brevet Maj , September 8, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Molino del Rev. Brevet Lt.-Col., June 27, 1862, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Gaines's Mills,' Va. ROSSELL, WILLIAM H. [2dLt. \Qth Inf., Mar. 3, '55.) [Capt. \atk Inf., Sept. 7, '61.) Brevet Maj., February 21, 1862, for gallant and meritorious .service at the battle of Valverde, N. M. ROUSSEAU, LOVELL H. [Brig.-Gen., Mar. 28, '67.) [Brig.-Gen., Mar. 28, '67.) Brevet Maj.-Gen., March 28, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service dur- ing the war. ROWE, THEODORE F. [Capt. t)tk Inf., April 9, '47.) [Capt <)tk Inf., April 9, '47.) Brevet Maj., for gallant and meritorious conduct in defence of Puebla, Mexi- co, from September 13, to October 12, 1847. ROWXEY, GEORGE A. [2d Lt 2d Inf., May 12, '62.) ( \st Lt. 2d Inf., April 1 1, '64.) MBrevet Capt., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service at the bat- tle of Gettysburg, Pa. ROY ALL, WILLIAM B. [ist Lt. 2d Cav., Mar. 3, '55.) [Lt.-Col. ^d Cav., Dec. 2, '75.) Brevet Maj., May 27, 1862, for gallant and meritorious service at the bat- tle of Hanover C. H., Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., June 13, 1862, for gallant and meritorious service in the cavalry action at Old Church, Va. Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for arduous and faithful service in the recruitment of the armies of the United States. 5IO BREVETS CONFERRED FROM -l8l2 RUCKER, DANIEL H. {T.d Lt. 1st Drags., Oct. 13, '37.) (A. Q. M. G. (Col.), July 28, '66.) Brevet Maj., February 23, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Buena Vista. Brevet Lt.-Col., Brevet Col., and Brevet Brig.-Gen., July 5, 1864, for diligent and faithful service during the war. Brevet Maj.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. RUFF, CHARLES F. (zd Lt. 1st Drags., yuly I, '38.) (Lt.-Col. ^d Cav., June 10, '61.) Brevet Maj., August i, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at San Juan de Ids Llanos, Mexico. Brevet Col. and Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious service in recruiting the armies of the United States. RUGER, THOMAS H. i Bvt. 2d Lt. Engrs., July I, '54. ) } HesioTted April i, '55, Col. zy^S (Col. iZth Inf., July 28, '66.) ( Inf., July 28, '66. ) Brevet Brig.-Gen., March'2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious conduct at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. RUGGLES, DANIEL. (Bvt. 2dLt. tfh Inf., July i, '33.) (Capt, ^th Inf., fune l8, '46.) Brevet Maj., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. Brevet Lt.-Col. September 13, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Chapultepec. RUGGLES, GEORGE D. (Bvt. id Lt. 1st Inf., July i, '55.) " [Asst. Adjt. Genl. (MaJ.),yuly 17, '62.) Brevet Lt.-Col. and Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service during the war. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service during campaign terminating with surrender of insurgent army of Northern Va. RUNKLE, BENJAMIN P. (Maj. \^h Inf., July 28, '66.) (Maj. \tjth Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet Lt.-Col., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Shiloh, Tenn. Brevet Col., March 2, 1867, fo^" gallant and meritorious service during the war. RUSSELL, CHARLES S. (Capt. wth Inf., May 14, '61.) (Capt. nth Inf., May 14, '61.) Brevet Maj., September 17, 1862, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Antietam, Md. Brevet Lt.-Col., May 3, 1863, for gallant and merit- orious service at the battle of Chancellorsvil'le, Va. Brevet Col., July 30, 1864, for gallant and meritorious service in action that succeeded the ex- plosion of the Petersburg mine, Va. RUSSELL, DAVID A. (Bvt. idLt. 1st Inf., July i, '45.) (Maj. ith Inf., Aug. 9, '62.) Brevet ist Lt., August 15, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Paso Ovejas, National Bridge, and Cerro Gordo. Brevet Lt.-Col., July i. 1862, for gallant and meritorious service in the Peninsula campaign. Brevet Col., July I, 1863, for gallant and meritorious service at the battlg-Jof Gettys- burg, Pa. Brevet Brig.-Gen., May 6, 1864, for gallant and meritorious ser- TO THE PRESENT TIME. 5II vice at the battle of the Wilderness, Va. Brevet Maj.-Gen., September 19.) 1864, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Opequan, Va., where killed. RUSSELL, EDMUND. (Bvt. id Lt. 6th Inf., July I, '46.) (irf Lt. i,th Inf., Jan. 37, '5c.) Brevet 1st Lt, September 8, 18.(7 [or gallant and meritorious conduct in the battle of Molino del Key. RUSSELL, FRANCIS S. K. (idLt. Mid. Rifles, M.ty 27, '46.) {ut It. Mid. Rifles, Mar. 15, "48.) , Brevet ist Lt., September 13, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct in the battle of Chapultepec. RUSSELL, GERALD. (2(1 It. Tfl Cav., July 17, '62.) (Capt. yd Cav., Nov. 14, '67,) Brevet ist Lt., July 4, 1863, for gallant and meritorious service at the siege of Vicksburg, Miss. RUSSELL, GEORG-B B. (Capt. i^h Inf., July 28, '66.) (Capt. i,\th Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service in the assault on Port Hudson, La. RUSSELL,. SAMUEL A. (2d It. ^th Inf., Aug. 5, '61.) (Capt. -jth Inf., Aug. 28. '63.) Brevet Maj., April 22, 1865, for meritorious service during the war. RUSSELL, -WILLIAM Jr. (2d It. ifh Cav., Oct. 25, '67.) (2d It. Afh Cav. Oct 25, '67.) Brevet ist Lt., October 25, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service in the battle of Antietam, Md. Brevet Capt., October 25, 1867, for gallant and meri- torious service in the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Maj., October 25, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service in the battle of Petersburg, Va. RUTHERFORD, ALLAN. (\stlt. i^h Inf., July 28, '66.) (Capt. i,i,tk Inf., Mar. 20, '67.) Brevet Capt. and Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service in the battle of Bull Run (2d), Va. RUTHERFORD, ROBERT G. (2d It. i,ith Inf., Mar. 7, '67.) (ist It. 12th Inf., May 24, '73.) Brevet ist Lt., March 7, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service in the bat- tle of Rappahannock Station, Va. Brevet Capt, March 7, 1867, for gallant and meiritorious service during the war. RZIHA, JOHN. KCapt. \()th Inf., Aug. 5. '61.) (Capt. igth Inf., Aug. 5, '61.) Brevet Maj., February 27, 1865. No service specified in nomination or com- mission. SACKET, DELOS B. (Bvt. zdLt. 2d Drags. July I, '45.) (Inst. Genl. (Col), Oct. I, '61.) Brevet 1st Lt. May 9, 1846, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Palo Alto 512 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 and Resaca de la Palma. Brevet Brig-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service in the field during the war. Brevet Maj.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious service during the war. SANBOURNE, MATTSON C. (2dLt. -jth Inf., May 25, '66.) (ist I.t. jth Inf., Oct. 11, '71.) Brevet ist Lt. and Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service during the war. SANDS, RICHARD M. (Ens. ^Ztk Inf., May 20, '13.) [Vapt. ifh Inf., Apl. 30, '19.) Brevet Maj., April 30 , 1829, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. SANDERS, JOHN. [Bvt. idLt. Engrs. July i, '34.) [Capt. Engrs, Dec, 7, '38.) Brevet Maj., September 23, 1846, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Monterey, Mexico. SANDERS, "WILLIAM W. (2dLt. 6th Inf., June 23, '60.) [Capt. 6th Inf., June 27, '62. ) Brevet Maj., December 2, 1864, for faithful and meritorious service in the field. Brevet Lt.-Col., April 2, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service in front of Petersburg, Va. Brevet Col., April 9, 1865, for gallant and merito- rious service in campaign terminating with the surrender of General Lee. SANDERSON, GEORGE E. {zdLt. isth Inf., Oct. 31, '61.) (Capt. xuh Inf., Mar. 28, '66.) Brevet ist Lt., April 7, 1862, for gallant and meritorious service at the bat- tle of Shiloh, Tenn. Brevet Capt., September i, 1864, for gallant and merit- orious service during the Atlanta campaign. SANDERSON, VTINSLOW F. (Capt. Mtd. Rifles, May 27, '46.) (Maj. Mtd. Rifles, Jan. 8, '48.) Brevet Maj., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. SANPORD, GEORGE B. (zd Lt. \st Cav., April 26, '61.) (Maj. ist Cav., June 25, '76.) Brevet Maj., October ig, 1864, for gallant and meritorious service at the bat- tle of Cedar Creek, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meri- torious services duriiig the war. SANGER, JOSEPH P. {2dLt. 1st Arty., Aug. 5, '6r.) (Capt. \st Arty., Feb. 7, '75.) Brevet Capt., May 28, 1864, for gallant and meritorious service in action at Bermuda Hundred, Va. Brevet Maj , March 13, 1865, for gallant and meri- torious service at the battle of Fussell's Mills, Va., August 16, 1864. SANGER, LOUIS H. (2d Lt. \-]th Inf., July 19, '62.) (Capt. lyth Inf., July 21, '65.) Brevet Capt., July 2, 1863, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. TO THE PRESENT TIME. 513 SATTBRIiEE, RICHARD S. [Asst. Surg-., Feb. 25, '22.) (C/if. Med. Pur. (Lt.-Col.), July 28, '66.) Brevet Lt.-Col., Brevet Col., and Brevet Brig.-Gen., September 2, 1864, for diligent care and attention in procuring proper army supplies as Medical Pur- veyor, and for economy and fidelity in the disbursement of large sums of money. SAUNDERS, HENRY. {t^ Lt. 20th Inf., April 4, '13.) (Caft. \st Arty., Nov. 4, '1823.) Brevet Maj., November 4, 1833, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. SAWTELLE, CHARLES G. (Bvt 2d Lt. 2d Inf., July i, '54.) [Qr. Mr. (Ma/.), Jan. 18, '67.) Brevet Mij., Brevet Lt.-Col., and Brevet Col., March 13, 1855. for faith- ful and meritorious service during the war. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1S65, for faithful and meritorious service in the Quartermaster's Department during the War. SAXTON, RTJFUS. (Bvt. 2dLt. 2d Arty., July i, '49.) (£>ep. Qr. Gen. (Lt.-Col.), June 6, '72.) Brevet Maj., Brevet Lt.-Col., and Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the wrar. Brevet Brig.-Gen., April 9, 1865, for faithful and meritorious service during the war. SCANTLAND, JAMES M. (Capt. 14/^ Inf., Apl. 9, '47.) (Capt. i^th Inf., Apl. 9, '47.) Brevet Maj., September 13, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Chapultepec. SCARRITT, JEREMIAH M. (2d Lt. 6t& Inf., July I, '38.) ( Capt. Engrs. Mar. 3, '53.) Brevet Capt, September 23, 1846, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Monterey. SCHAFP, MORRIS. (2d Lt. ofOrdn., June 17, '62.) (Capt. ofOrdn., Mar.-j, '67.) Brevet Capt., May 6, 1864, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of the Wilderness, Va. SCHAURTE, FREDERICK W. (zdLt. 2d Cav., June 1 1, '62.) ( Capt. 2d Cav. ) Brevet Capt., Brevet Maj., and Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service during the war. SCHELI., HENRY S. (Asst. Surg., Aug. 5, '61.) (Asst. Surg., Aug. 5, "61.) Brevet Capt. and Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious service during the war. Brevet Lt.-Col., September 28, 1866, for meritorious and distinguished service at Tybee Island, and Savannah, Ga., where cholera prevailed. SCHENCK, PETER V. (Asst. Surg., May 28, '61.) (Asst. Sur^., May 28, '61.) Brevet Capt. and Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious service during the war. 23 514 BKEVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 SCHINDEL, JEREMIAH P. l^2dLt. 6tk Inf., Oct. 24, '6i.) {Capt. (,th Inf., Feb. 25, '68,) Brevet ist Lt., August 30, 1862, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Bull Run (2d), Va. Brevet Capt., July 2, 1863, for gallant and meri- torious service at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. SCHOFIELD, GEORGE W. (,Maj. i,\st Inf., July 28, '66.) (Maj. lath Cav., July 28, '66.) Brevet Lt.-Col., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service at; the battle of Champion Hill, Miss. Brevet Col., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service at the siege of Vicksburg, Miss. SCHOFIELD, JOHN M. {Bvt. zd Lt. 2d Arty., July i, '53.) {Maj.-Gen., Mar. 4, '69.) Brevet Maj.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Franklin, Tenn. SCHMUCK, JACOB. {yl Lt. id Arty., Feb. 10, '14.) [Capt. i^h Arty., Apt. 11, '25.) ►■ Brevet ist Lt., July 25, 1814, for gallant conduct at the battle of Niagara. Brevet Capt., July 25, 1824, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. SCHRIVER, EDMUND. (Bvt. zdLt. 2d Arty., July 1, '33.) (Insp. Genl. (Col.), Mar. 13, '63.) Brevet Brig.-Gfen., August i, 1864, for faithful and meritorious service in the field. Brevet Maj.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for meritorious and distinguished service during the rebellion. SCHROEDER, HENRY B. (Bvt 2d Lt ■id Inf., July I, '44.) (Capt. -^d Inf., May 31, '57.) Brevet ist Lt., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. SCHUREMAN, JAMES "W. (Bvt. 2d Lt. -jth Inf., July I, '42.) (\st Lt 2d Inf., Jan. 12, '48.) Brevet ist Lt, August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. SCHUYLER, PHILIP. (ist Lieut, l^h. Inf., May 14, '61.) (Capt. lifh Inf., July il, '62.) y Brevet Maj., April 9, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service during the campaign terminating with the surrender of Gen. Lee. SCHWAN, THEODORE. (2dLt loth Inf., Oct. 31, '63.) (Capt. nth Inf., Mar. 14, '66.) Brevet Capt., October r, 1864, for gallant service at the battle of Chapel House, Va. Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service during the war. SCHWENK, SAMUEL. [istLt 4irf Ittf, July 28, '66.) (Capt. 41^ Inf., Dec. 16, '67.) Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service at the bat- tle of Spottsylvania. Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service in the battle of Nye River, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service in the battle of Cold Harbor, Va. TO THE PRESENT TIME. 5 IS SCOTT, DAVID I. 'idLt. loih Inf., May i8, '64.) (1st Lt. loth hif., Feb. 3, '65.) Brevet ist Lt., May 19, 1864, for gallant and meritorious service at the bat- tle of Spottsylvania, Va. SCOTT, GEORGE E. [Capt, 2i,th Inf., July 28, '66. ) {Capt. 241/1 Inf., 'July 28, '66.) Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service in the action of Lawrenceburg, Ky. SCOTT, HENRY L. [Bvt. 2dLt. 4h Inf., July i, '33.) (Insp. Genl. {Col.), May 24, '61.) Brevet Maj., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. Brevet Lt.-Col., September 13, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Chapultepec. SCOTT, JOHN B. [Bvt 2dLt. ifh Arty., July i, '21.) (Maj. -^d Arty., June 10, '57.) Brevet Maj., May 9, 1846, for gallant conduct at Palo Alto and Resaca de la Palma. * SCOTT, JOHN M. (Bvt 2d Lt jst Inf., July i, '35.) (Capt 1st Inf., June 18, '46.) Brevet Maj., September 23, 1846, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Monterey. SCOTT, LUTHER. (istLf. Arty., Mar. 24, '12.) (Capt Arty., Nov. 24, '17.) Brevet Capt., February 20, 1815, for distinguished and meritorious ser- vices. SCOTT, MARTIN. [2d Lt 2(ith Inf., April 21, '14.) (Maj. c,t/i Inf., June 29, '46.) • Brevet Maj., May 9, 1846, for gallant conduct at Palo Alto and Resaca de la Palma. Brevet Lt.-Col., September 23, 1846, for gallant and meritorious con- duct in the several conflicts at Monterey. SCOTT, ROBERT N. (2dLt ifh Inf., Feb. 21, '57.) (Capt. ^d Arty., Sept 25, '61.) Brevet Maj., June 27, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gaines's Mills, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for meritorious services in connection with the organization of the volunteer army of the United States. SCOTT, WILLIAM H. {2dLt wth Inf., Aprils '47.) (\st Lt A,th Inf., Aug. I, '52.) Brevet ist Lt., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Contreras and Churubusco. SCOTT, ■WINFIELD. [Capt Light Arty., May 3, '08.) (Maj.-Gen., June 25, '41.) Brevet Maj.-Gen., July 25, 1814, for distinguished services in the battles of Chippewa, Niagara, etc. Brevet Lt.-Gen., March 29, 1847, for eminent ser- vices in the war vvith Mexico. 5l6 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 SCREVEN, RICHARD B. (Bvt. 2d Li. 2d Inf., July i, '29.) {Capt. %th Inf., July 7, '38.) Brevet Maj., September 23, 1846, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Mon- terey. Brevet Lt.-Col., September 8, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Molino del Rey. SCULLY, JAIMBS W. M. Q. M. (Capt.), Sept. 27, '65.) (A. Q. M. (Capt.), Sept. 27, '65.) Brevet Maj., September 27, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service in the battle of Mill Springs, Ky. Brevet Lt.-Col., September 27, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Shiloh, Tenn. Brevet Col., Septem- ber 27, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service in the battle of Nashville, Tenn. SEARLE, FREDERICK. [Bvt. 2dLf. \stArty., July 1, '23.) (A. Q. M. (Capt.), July 7, '38.) Brevet Maj., November 25, 1839, for gallant and good conduct in the war against the Florida Indians. SEARS, HENRY B. (Bvt. 2d Lt. 2d Arty., July i, '46.) (1st Lt. 2d Arty., Oct. 27, '47.) Brevet ist Lt, August 15, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct in several affairs with Guerilleros at Paso Ovejas, National Bridge, and Cerro Gordo, Mexico. SEAWBLL, WASHINGTON. (Bvt. 2d Lt. -jth Inf., July i, '25.) (Col. 6th Inf., Oct. 17, '60.) Brevet Maj., July 18, 1841, for meritorious and successful services in the war against the Florida Indians. Brevet Brig. -Gen., March 13, 1865, for long and faithful services in the army. SEDGWICK, JOHN. (id Lt. 2d Arty., July I, '37 ) (Col. 1st Cav., April 25, '61.) Brevet Capt., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. Brevet Maj., September 13, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Chapultepec. SELDEN, JOSEPH. (2dLt. Wi Inf., July 7, '38.) (Capt. %th Inf., Jan I, '48.) Brevet Capt., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. Brevet Maj^ September 13, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Chapultepec. SELDEN, JOSEPH. (Capt. 2d Light Brags., Mar. 12, '12.) (Maj. yl Rifles, Feb. 21, '14.) Brevet Maj., February 21, 1814, for meritorious services. Brevet Lt.-Col., May I, 18:5, for distinguished services. SELLERS, EDWIN E. (2d Lt. loth Inf.,. Oct. 24, '6l.) (Capt. loth Inf., Feb. 17, '64.) Brevet ist Lt., May 3, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the bat- tle of Chancellorsville, Va. Brevet Capt., July 2, 1863, for gallant and merito- rious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. TO THE PRESENT TIME. 5 I / SELLMER, CHARLES. (zd Lt. 2d Inf., Sept- 2, '67.) (zd Lt. ^d Arty., Seft. 2, '67.) ' Brevet ist Lt., September 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the capture of Fort Gregg. Brevet Capt., September 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Appomattox C. H., Va. SEMPLB, JAMES Y. (t^dLt. \^h Inf., Oct. 30, '61.) (Capt. l^A Inf., Dec. 29, '65.) Brevet Capt., December 31, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Murfreesboro, Tenn. SEMPLE, JOSEPH E. {Asst. Surg., Aug. 5, '61.) (Asst. Surg., Aug. 5, '61.) Brevet Capt. and Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. SEWARD, AUGUSTUS H. (Bvt. 2d Lt. %th Inf., July 1, '47.) (Paymaster [Ma].), M.ir. 27, '61.) .Brevet Lt-Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. Brevet Col, November 11, 1865, for faithful and meritorious ser- vices in the Pay Department during the war. SEWARD, DUDLEY. (Capt %th Cav., July 28, '66.) (Capt. Zth Cav., July 28, '66.) Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in action at Monticello, Ky., June 9, 1863. SEYMOUR, THOMAS H. (Maj. i)tk Inf., April 9, '47.) (Lt.-Col. 12th Inf., Aug. 12, '47.) " Brevet Col., September 13, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct in the battle of Chapultepec. SEYMOUR, TRUMAN. (Bvt 2dLt 1st Arty., July I, '46.) (Maj. tfk Arty., Aug. 13, '66.) Brevet ist Lt, April 18, 1847, ^°'^ gallant and meritorious conduct at Cerro Gbrdo. Brevet Capt., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Contreras and Churubusco. Brevet Maj., April 14, 1861, for gallant and meritorious services during the defense of Fort Sumter, S. C. Brevet Lt.- Col., September 14, 1S62, for gallant and meritorious services at South Moun- tain, Md. Brevet Col., September 17, 1862, for gallant and meritorious ser- vices at Antietam, Md. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the capture of Petersbui-g, Va. Brevet Maj.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services in the field during the rebellion. SHAPTER, WILLIAM R. (Lt.-Col 4irf Inf., July 28, '66.) (Lt.-Col. 2i^h Inf., July 28, '(>(>.) Brevet Col, March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the bat- tle of Fair Oaks, Va. SHANNON, SAMUEL. (Ens. i^hlnf, July, '14.) (Capt. \st Inf., July 28, '31.) Brevet Capt. February 23, 1830, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. 5 1 8 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM . 1 8 1 3 SHA"W, RICHARD G. {zd Lt 1st Arty., Mar. 27, '66.) (1st Lt. 1st Arty., 'July 28, '66.) Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services on Morris Island, S. C. SHEA, THOMAS. {1st Lt, i^h Inf., Jan. 22, '67.) ■ (Capt. i^h Inf., June 5, '67.) Brevet Capt. and Brevet Maj , March 2, 1867, for gallant and' meritorious- services in action at Rome, Ga. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 2, 1867, for gallant' and meritorious services in the battle of Peach Tree Creek, Ga. Brevet Col., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. SHEBTZ, JOSIAH A. (istLf. Tpth Inf., Mar. 7, '67.) (1st Lt. jpth Inf., Mar. 7, '67.) Brevet Capt., March 7, 1867, for gallant andmeritorious services in the battle of Vicksburg, Miss. Brevet Maj., March 7, 1867, for gallant and meritorious ' services in the capture of Mobile, Ala. SHEILDS, •WILLIAM. (2d Lt. i,/^h Inf., July 28, '66.) [ist Lt. 6^h Inf., Jan. 15, '67!) .. Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the bat- tle of Fredericksburg, Va. SHELDON, ALEXANDER B. (zdLt. \th Inf., Aug. 5, '61.) (Capt. i^h Inf., Aug. 25, '64.) Brevet Capt., May 3, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle : of Chancellorsville, Va. .Brevet Maj., April 2, 1865, for gallant and merito- rious services at the capture of Petersburg, Va. SHELDON, H. LAURENCE. (Asst. Surg., July 26, '61.) (Asst. Surg., July 26, '61.) Brevet Capt. and Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. SHEPHERD, OLIVER L. (Bvt. 2dLt. ifh Inf., July 1, '40.) (Col. it,th Inf., Jan. 21, '63.) Brevet Capt., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. Brevet Maj., September 13, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Chapultepec. Brevet Col., May 17, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the siege of Corinth, Miss. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Stone River, Tenn. SHERBURNE, JOHN P. (2dLt. 1st Inf., June 27, '56.) (A. A. G. (Maj.), July 17, '62.) Brevet Lt.-Col. and Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and merito- rious services during the war. SHERIDAN, ANDREW. [2d Lt. Z^ Inf., Mar. 23, '61.) (Capt. 2/^th Inf., Feb. 9, '63.) Brevet Maj., July 2, 1863, for gallant and meritorious service at the bat- tle of Gettysburg, Pa. TO THE PRESENT TIME. 519 SHERIDAN, MICHAEL V. [zdLt. tfh Cav., Feb. 23, '66.) {Capt. yt/i Cav., July 28, '66.) Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the bat- tle of Opequan, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 2, 1867, for gallant and merito- rious services at the battle of Fisher's Hill, Va. 3 SHERMAN, THOMAS W {?.dLt. yiArty., July i, '36.) [Col. T,d Arty., June i, '63.) Brevet Maj., February 23, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Buena Vista. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the capture of Port Hudson. Brevet Maj.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. SHERMAN, "WILLIAM T. [2d Lt. ;^d Arty., July I, '40.) (Gen. of the Army, Mar. 4, '69.) Brevet Capt., May 30, 1848, for meritorious services in California and during the war with Mexico. SHIELDS, HAMILTON L. [Bvt 2d Lt. 2d Arty., July i, '46.) (ist Lt. T,d Arty., Sept. 22, '47.) Brevet ist Lt., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. Brevet Capt., September 8, 1847, fo'' gallant and meritorious conduct at Molino del Rey.' SHIELDS, JAMES. (B'-ig.-Gen. U. S. Vols., J.ily I, '46.) (Brig.-Gm. U. S. Vols., July I, '46.) Brevet Maj.-Gen., U. S. A., April 18, 1847, foi^ gallant and meritorious con- duct in the battle of Cerro Gordo. (See narrative, p. 197.) SHINN, JOHN B. (Bvt2dLt.yl Arty., July i,'z,e.) (Capt. T,d Arty., Jjn. 20, '6^.) Brevet Maj,, March 13, 1865, for arduous and meritorious services in suc- cessfully bringing his battery across the Yuma and Gila deserts, and for faith- ful services in New Mexico. SHIPLEY, ALEXANDER N. (Bvt. 2d Lt cfh Inf., June i, '57.) (A. Q. M. (Capt.), Mar. 24, '62.) Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. SHIRAS, ALEXANDER E. (Bvt. 2dLt A^h Arty., July i, '33.) (C. G. of Sub. (Brig.-Gen.), May i, '74.) Brevet Brig.-Gen., September 17, 1864, for meritorious and distinguished services in the Subsistence Department, and in supplying the armies during the war. Brevet Maj.-Gsn., March 13, 186'), for faithful', meritorious, and distin- guished services in the Subsistence Department during the war. SHORKLBY, GEORGE. (2dLt ie,tk Inf., Feb. 23, '65) (Capt. \i,th Inf., Oct. 13, '67.) Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Antietam, Md. Brevet Maj., March i, i86,-, for gallant and merito- rious services in the engagement at Fort Stedman, Va. S20 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 SHOVBR, "WILLIAM H. (2d Lt. 2id Arty., July i, '38.) {Capt. 31/ Arty., Mar. 22, '47.) Brevet Capt., September 23, 1846, for gallant conduct at Monterey. Brevet Maj., February 23, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Bueiia Vesta. SHXJNK, FRAITCIS J. (Bvt. zd Lt. of Ordn., July i, '53.) {Maj. of Ordn., Mar. 7, '67.) Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services in the Ordnance Department. SHURLY, EDMUND R. P. (2rf Lt. ^^th Inf., Mar. 15, '67.) (\st Lt. z-jth Inf., Sept. 29, '68.) Brevet ist Lt., March 15, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Fredericksburg', Va. Brevet Capt., March 15, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. SIBLEY, CALEB C. (Bvt. zd Lt. tfh Inf., July i, '29.) (Col. \6th Inf., April 20/64.) Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. SIBLEY, EBENEZER S. (Bvi. 2dLt. of Arty., July 1, '27.) (Dep. Q. M. G. (L/.-Col.), Aug: 3, '61.). Brevet Maj., Febru-iry 23, 1S47, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Buena Vesta. Brevet Lt.-Col., May 6, 1861, and Brevet Col., June 12, 1861. No service mentioned in commissions. SIBLEY, HENRY H. (2d Lt. zd Drags., July i, '38.) (Maj. 1st Drags., May 13, '61.) Brevet Maj, March 25, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Medelin, near Vera Cruz, N. M. SICKLES, DANIEL B. ( Col. 42d Inf., July 2%, '66.) (Col. ifld Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Fredericksburg, Va. Brevet Mij.-Gen., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. SIDELL, -WTILLIAM H. (Bvt. 2d Z'. \st Arty., July i, '33:) (Lt.-Col. loth Inf., May 6, '64.) Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for meritorious and faithful services in the recruitment of the armies of the United States. Brevet Brig.-Gen, March 13, lijj, for faithful an;l efficient services during the war. SILLIMAN, HENRY R. (Asst. Surg., Mjy 28, '61.) (Asst. Surg., May 28, '61.) Brevet Capt. and Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. SILVBY, "WILLIAM. (Bvt. 2d Lt. yt Arty., July i, '49) (M.ij. y/i Arty., Feb. 7, '75.) Brevet Maj., March 30, 1865, for meritorious and faithf.il services in the recruitment of the armies of the United States. Brevet Lt.-Col., November 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services in connection with the muster- ing out of service and disbanding of the volunteer armies of the United States. TO THE PRESENT TIME. 521 SIIOKINS, JOHN C. [ist Lt. \2tk Inf., May. 22, '47.) (ist Lt. \ith Inf., May 22, '47.) Brevet Capt, August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Contreras and Cliurubusco. SIMON, CHARLES. [p.dLt. t,th Arty., Oct. 22, '62.) {,\st Lt. tfh Arty., Mar. 9, '66.) Brevet ist Lt., December 13, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Fredericksburg, Va. Brevet- Capt., June 3, 1864, for gallant and maritorious services at the battle of Cold tiarbor, Va. SIMONS, JAMES. ^zdLt. i&th Inf., May 14, '6i ) (ist Lt. I'&th Inf., Oct. 24, '6i.) Brevet Capt., December 31, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Murfreesboro, Tenn. SIMONS, JAMES. (Asst. Surg., July 11, '39.) (Surg. (Lt.-CoL), June 26, '76.) Brevet Lt.-Col. and Brevet Col, March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. SIMONSON, JOHN S. (Capt. Mtd. Rifles, May 27, '46.) (Col. yl Cav., May 13, '61.) Brevet Maj., September 13, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Chapultepec. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for long and faithful services in the army. SIMONTON, EDWARD. (zdLt. 4tA Inf., Feb. 23, '66.) (\st Lt. 4k Inf., April 21, '66.) Brevet Capt, March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the bat- tle of Petersburg, Va. SIMPSON, JAMES F. (zd Lt. ifOth Inf., Aug. 17, '67.) (zd Lt. id Cav., Aug. 17, '67.) Brevet ist Lt., August 17, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of the Wilderness, Va. Brevet Capt., August 17, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Ream's Station, Va. SIMPSON, JAMES H. (Bvt. zdLt. -^^ Arty., July I, '32.) (Col. Engrs., Mar. 7, '67.) Brevet Col. and Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for faithful and merito- rious services during the vfar. SIMPSON, JOSIAH. (Asst. Surg., July 11, '37.) (Surg. (Maj.), Aug 12, '55 ) Br«vet Lt.-Col. and Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. SIMPSON, MARCUS D. L. (Bvt. zdLt. zdArty., July 1, '46.) (A. C. G. of Subs. (Col.), May i, '74.) Brevet 1st Lt., August 20, 1847, f^ gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. Brevet Capt., September 13, 1847, for gallant and meri- torious conduct at Chapultepec Brevet Col., Brevet Brig.-Gen., and Brevet Maj.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service during the war. ■ 23* 522; BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 SINCLAIR, JAMBS B. {isi Lt. 14//1 Inf., Oct. j6, '61.) (.Capt. \i,th Inf., July 25, '65.) ■ Brevet Capt., August i, 1864, for gallant services at the battle of Spottsyl- vania. Brevet Maj., October i, 1864, for gallant services at the battle of Chapel fiouse, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col. and Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for gal- lant and meritorious services during the war. SINCLAIR, WILLIAM. (Bvt. id Lt. 2d Arty., July I, '57.) [Capt. yl Arty., Dec. 11, '65.) Brevet Capt., May 4, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the siege of Yorktown, Va. Brevet Maj., December 13, 1862, for gallant and merito- rious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. SITGREAViES, LORENZO. [Bvt. 2d Lt 1st Arty., July i, '32.) [Lt.-Col. Engrs., April 22, '64.) Brevet Capt., February 23, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Buena Vista. SKINNER, RICHARD. [2d Lt. \ath Inf., Sept. 23, '62.) [\st Lt. loth Inf., Oct. 16, '63.) Brevet Capt., June ig, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services in action in front of Petersburg, Va. SLADBN, JOSEPH A. [2d Lt. iTth Inf., Mar. 27, '66.) [ist Lt. i/^t/i Inf., July 17, '67.) Brevet ist Lt., and Brevet Capt, March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Jonesboro, Ga. SLBMMBR, ADAM J. [Bvt. 2ff Lt. 1st Arty., July i, '50.) [Lt.-Col. 4th Inf, Fed. 8, '64.) Brevet Lt.-Col., December 31, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Murfreesboro, Tenn. Brevet Col. and Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. SLIDELL, VyiLLIAM J. [1st Lt. l6th Inf., May 14, '61.) [Capt. l6t/i Inf., Nm. 19, '61.) Brevet Maj., November 25, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battles of Murfreesboro and Mission Ridge, Tenn. SLOAN, WILLIAM J. [Asst. Surg., July 12, '37.) [Surg. (Lt.-Col.), June 26, '76.) , Brevet Lt.-Col. and Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. Brevet Brig.-Gen., September 28, 1866, for merito- rious and distinguished services at several posts in New York Harbor, where cholera prevailed. SLOCUM, JOHN S. (istLt. rjth Inf., April 9, '47.) [Capt <)th Inf., Sept. — , '47.) Brevet Capt., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. SMALL, JOHN P. [2d Lt. 1st Cav., May 18, '64.) (1st Lt. 1st Cav., Aug. 29, '64.) Brevet ist Lt., May 31, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Cold Harbor, Va. Brevet Capt., September 8, 1867, for gallantry in TO THE PRESENT TIME. 5^3 charging a band of Indians, killing and capturing more of the enemy than he had men, on Silver Lake, Oregon, September 8, 1867. SMALL, MICHAEL P. {Sz/t. 2d Lt. T,d Arty., July i, '5S') (Com. of Subs. (Maj.), June 23, '74-) Brevet Maj., Brevet Lt.-Col, and Brevet Col., IMarch 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services in the Subsistence Department during the war. Brevet Brig.-Gen , April 9, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services in his department during the war. SMART, CHARLES. [Asst. Surg., Mar. 30, '64.) [Asst. Surg., Mar. 30, '64.) Brevet Capt., December 2, 1864, for meritorious services in the field during the campaign before Richmond. SMEDBERG, -WILLIAM R. [ist Lt. \ifh Inf., May 14, '61.) [Capt. i^t/i Inf., Oct. 25, '61.) Brevet Maj., July 2, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Lt.-Col., May 5, 1864, for gallant and meritorious ser- vices at the battle of the Wilderness, Va. SMITH, ALFRED T. [Bvt. 2d Lt. i,tli Inf., July i, '60.) {Capt. 8tA Inf., Sept 19, '6;^.) Brevet Capt., July i, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services during the Peninsular Campaign in Virginia. Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. SMITH, ALGERNON E. {2d It. ytA Cav., Aug. 9, '67.) {ut Lt. -jih Cav., Dec. 5, '68.) Brevet ist Lt., August 9, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Drury's Farm. Brevet Capt., August 9, 1867, for gallant and merit- orious services in the capture of Fort Fisher, N. C. SMITH, ANDREW^ H. {Asst. Surg., July :i, '62.) {Asst. Sur., July 1 1, '62.) Brevet Capt. and Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faithful and itaeritorious services during the war. SMITH, ANDREW J. {zdLt. 1st Drags., July I, '38.) {Col. Tt& Cav., July 28, '66.) Brevet Col, April 10, 1864, for, gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Pleasant Hill, La. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and merit- orious services at the battle of Tupelo, Miss. Brevet Maj.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Nashville, Tenn. SMITH, ANDREW K. [Asst. Surg.,,July 26, '53.) {Surgeon [Maj.], June 11, '62.) Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 186c, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. SMITH, BENJAMIN F. {Bvt. zdLt. 1st Inf., July i, '53.) {Maj. 2jtk Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet Maj., April 7, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Shiloh, Tenn. Brevet Lt.-Col., April 2, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services in front of Petersburg, Va. 524 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 SMITH, CHARLES F. (Bvt. 2dLt. 2d Arty., July i, '25.) (Col. ^d Inf., Sept g, '61.) Brevet Maj May 9, 1846, for gallant and distinguished conduct at Palo Alto and Resaca de la'Palma. Brevet Lt.-Col., September 23, 1846, for gallant conduct at Monterey. Brevet Col , August 20, 1847, for gallant and merit- orious conduct at Contreras and Churubusco. SMITH, CHARLES H. (Col. 281/t Inf., July 28, '66.) (Col. \()th Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet Brig.-Gei., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Sailor's Creek, Va. Brevet Maj.-Gen., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. SMITH, EDMUND K. (Bvt. 2d Lt. c/h Inf., July I, '45.) (Maj. 2d Cav., Jan. 31, '61.) Brevet ist Lt., April 18, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Cerro Gordo. Brevet Capt., August 20, 1847, foi^ gallant and meritorious conduct at Contreras. SMITH,;_EDMUND L. (Capt. igt/i Inf., May 14, '61.) (Capt. \z) ' (\st Lt. 2d Inf., Fei. 16, '6$-) Brevet Ist Lt., May 5, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of the Wilderness, Va. Brevet Capt., May 12, 1864, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Spottsylvania Court House, Va. SOUDERS, JACOB A. (2d it. i^tk Inf., May 17, '67.) (2d Lt. ^^th Inf., May 17, '67.) Brevet ist Lt., May 17, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Fort Sanders, Tenn. Brevet Capt., May 17, 1867, for gallaiit and merit- orious services in the battle of Winchester, Va. SF ANGLER, JOHN VT. (2d Lt. 6th Cav., May 14, '61.) (Capt. 6th Cav., July 28, '66.) Brevet Capt., July 3, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services in the Get- tysburg campaign. TO THE PRESENT TIME. S^9 SPAULDING, EDWARD J. {2illt. 2d Cav.„yuly 17, '62.) (Capt. 2d Cav.. Feb. 12, '67.) Brevet Capt., June 9, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Beverly Ford, Va. SPAULDING, GEORGE S. (2d Lt. 33d Inf., July 28, '66.) ( \st Lt. 33,/ Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet Capt, March 2, 1867, for faithful and meritorious services. SPENCER, THOMAS J. [idLt. loth Cav., July 28, '66.) (ist Lt. loth Cav., June I, '67.) Brevet 1st Lt. and Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Atlanta, Ga. SPENCER, "WILLIAM C. (Asst. Surg., May 28, '61.) (Surg. (Maj.), July 28, '66.) Brevet Capt., Brevet Maj., and Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. SPOTTS, SAMUEL. {2dLt. of Arty., Feb. 10, '12.) {Capt. 3d Arty., May 8, '22.) Brevet Capt., January 8, 1815, for gallant conduct at the siege of New Or- leans. SPRA6UE, CHARLES J. [istLt. ()th Inf., Aprilf), '47.) (Paymaster (Maf.), Jan. 17, '67.) Brevet Capt., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. SPRAGUE, JOHN T. [2dLt. tfh Inf., July 3, '37.) (Col. -jth Inf., June 12, '65.) Brevet Capt., March 15, 1842, for meritorious and successful conduct in the war against the Florida Indians. Brevet Maj., May 30, 1848, for meritorious conduct SPROUL, JOHN. (Capt. 13th Inf., Mar. 12, '12.) (Maj. 13th Inf., July 25, '14.) Retained, May, 181 5, as Captain 2d Infantry (in reorganization under Act of March 3, 1815), with Brevet of Major from July 25, 1814. SPURGIN, "WILLIAM F. (irf Lt. 3Zth Inf., July 28, '66.) [Capt. 21st Inf., June 2, '76.) Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in action at Johnsouville, Tenn. Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and merit- orious services in the battle of Nashville, Tenn. STAGE"?, MA"5r H. [utLt. I2th Inf., May 14, '6l.) (Capt. I2t/t Inf., Aug. 19, '64.) Brevet Capt., August 18, 1864, for gallant service during oi^erations on the Weldon R. K., Va. Brevet Maj., April 9, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service during campaign terminating with the surrender of the insurgent army under Gen. Lee. Brevet Lt-Col., April 9, 1865, for gallant and efificient service in the engagements on the Weldon R. R., Va., 18, 19, and 21 of August, 1864. 53° BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 STANIFORD, THOMAS. {Ens. wfh Inf., Oct. 12, '12.) ^,Col. ^d Inf., Feb. 23, '52.) Brevet Maj., March i, 1830, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. Brevet Lt.-Col., May 9. 1846, for gallant conduct in the battles of Palg Alto and Resaca de la 'Palma. Brevet Col., September 23, 1846, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Monterey. STANHOPE, PHILIP W. [Caft. izth Inf., May 14, '61.) (Capt. 12th Inf., May 14, '6i.) Brevet Maj., August 18, 1864, for gallant services during the operations on the Weldon R. R. Brevet Lt.-Col., October 2, 1864, for gallant and meritorious service in action at Saltville, Va. STANLEY, DAVID S. (Bvt. 2dLt. zd Drags., July i, '53,) {Col. zzd Inf, July 28, '66.) Brevet Lt.-Col., December 31, 1862, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Stone River, Tenn. Brevet Col., May 15, 1864, for gallant and meritorious .service at the battle of Resaca, Ga Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Ruff's Station, Va. Brevet Maj.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Franklin, Tenn. STANLEY, WILLIAM. (2dLt. 10th. Inf., Oct. 31, '63.) (Capt. lot/i Inf, Jan. 22, '67.) Brevet 1st Lt., May 19, 1864, for gallant and meritorious service at the bat- tle of Spottsylvania, Va. Brevet Capt., June 3, 1864, for gallant and merit-, orious service at the battle of Cold Harbor, Va. STANSBURY, HOWARD E. (ist Lt. i^t/t Inf., May 14, '61.) [Capt. 19/// Inf., Nov. 25, '63.) Brevet Capt., September r, 1864, for gallant and meritorious service during the Atlanta campaign. Brevet Maj., December 16, 1864, for gallant and meri- torious service at the battles of Franklin and Nashville, Tenn. STANTON, ALEXANDER H. {2d Lt. 1st Cav., May 4, '66.) {\st Lt. 1st Cav., July'i, '68.) Brevet Capt., April 5, i863, for gallantry in an engagement with a large band of Indians on Malheur River, Oregon, April 5, 186S. STANTON, HENRY. {T,dLl. Lt. Arty., June 29, '13 ) {A. Q. M. G. {Col), July 7, '38.) Brevet Lt.-Col., May 13, 1830, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. Brevet Brig.-Gen., January i, 1847, for meritorious conduct, particularly jn performing his duties in prosecuting the war with Mexico. STAN WOOD, FRANK. {2d Lt. 2d Cav., Aug. 5, '61.) {Capt. ^d Cav., July 28, '66.) Brevet Capt., March 13, 1865, for coolness, energy, and skill in battle. Brevet Maj. and Brevet Lt.-Col., August I, 1865, for faithful and meritorious service during the war. STAPLES, WRIGHT. {2d Lt. iit/i Inf., June 30, '62.) {ist Lt. lUh Inf., Nov. 4, '63.) Brevet Capt., May 5, 1864, for gallant and meritorious service in the battle of the Wilderness, Va. . TO THE PRESENT ■ TIME. 531 STARR, SAMUEL H. (Bvt. 2dLt. 2d Drags., June 28, '48.I, [Maj. 6th Cnv., April 25, '62-) Brevet Maj., May 4, 1862, for gallant and meritorious service in action near Williamsburg, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., June 21, 1863, for gallant and meritorious service in action at Upperville, Va. Brevet Col., July 2, 1863, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. STEELE, FREDERICK. (Evt. 2dLt. 2d Inf., July i, '43.) {Col. 20th Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet ist Lt., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras. Brevet Capt., September 13, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Chapultepec. Brevet Col., July 4, 1863, for gallant and meritorious service in the campaign resulting in the capture of Vicksburg, Miss. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service in the cajJture of Little Rock, Ark. Brevet Maj.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service during the war. STEELE, GEORGE G. {Caft. 161A Inf., Mar. 12, '12.) (Maj. y^th Inf., Sept. 4, '14.) Retained, May, 1816 (in reorganization under act of March 3, 1815J, as Capt. 2d Inf. with Brevet of Maj., from September 4, 1814. STEELE, WILLIAM. {jBvt. 2d Lt. 2d Drags., July i, '40.) (Capt. 2d Drags., Nmi. 10 '51.) Brevet Capt., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Cou- treras and Churubusco. STEEN, ALEXANDER E. (ziLt \2th Inf., April 9, '47.) (\st Lt. 'id Inf., Sept. 28, '57.) ' Brevet ist Lt., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con-, treras and Churubusco. STEEN, ENOCH. (liLt. Mtd. Rangers, July 16, '32.) (Lt.-Col., 2d Cav., Sept. 28, '61.) Brevet Maj., February 23, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Buena Vista. STEVENS, CHARLES. (Ens. yl Inf., June 29, '13.) (ist Lt. -yllnf, yuly 20, '14.) Retained, December, 1815, (in reorganization under act of March 3, 1815), as 2d Lt. 8th Inf., with brevet ist Lt. from July 20, 1814. STEPTOE, EDWARD J. (2dLt -^d Arty., yuly i, '37.) (Lieut.-Col. \oth Inf., Sept. 9, '61.) Brevet Maj., April 18, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Cerro Gordo. Brevet Lt.-Col., September 13, 1847, for gallant and meritorious con- duct at Chapultepec. STERNBERG, GEORGE M. (Asst Surg, May 28, '61.) (Surgeon (Maj.), Dec. i, '75.) Brevet Capt. and Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious service during the war. STEUART, ADAM D. f Resigned Feb. I, '55, reappoint- (Paymr. Jan. 14, '23.) \ ed Paymr. (Maj.), May 31, { '61.) Brevet Lt.-Col., May 30, 1848, for meritorious conduct while serving in the 532 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM 1 8 12 enemy's country. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious service during the war. STEVENS, ISAAC I. {2d Lt. Engrs., July i, '39.) (ist Lt. Engrs., July I, '40.) Brevet Capt., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. Brevet Maj., September 13, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Chapultepec. STEVENS, PHINEAS. (2dLt. Y-]th Inf., Feb. 23, '66 ) (irf Lt lyth Inf., Feb. 23, '66.) Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service during the war. STEVENSON, JOHN. (Col. ■yith Inf., Jiily 28, '66.) (Col. zath Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet Brig.-Gen. March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Champion Hill, Miss. STEWART, CHARLES S. (2d Lt. Engrs., July i, '46.) (Lt.-Col. Engrs. Mafch 7, '67.) Brevet Lt.-Col., February 25, 1865, for long, faithful, and efficient services. Brevet Col , March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service during the war. STEWART, JAMES. (2d Lt. ifh Arty., Nov. 15, '61.) (Capt. \%th Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet Capt., August i, 1864, for gallant service at the battle of Spottsyl- vania Court House, Va. and during the campaign before Richmond. Brevet Maj , August i8, 1864, for gallant and meritorious service in the battle on the Welden R. R., Va. STICKNEY, AMOS. (\st Lt. Engrs., June 13, '64.) (Capt. Engrs., Mar. 7, '67.) Brevet Capt., December 21, 1864, for zeal and efficiency in the discharge of his duties with the army of the Tennessee during the campaign of 1864 in Georgia. Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious service during the campaign in Georgia and the Carolinas. STICKNEY, CLIFPORB. (\st Lt. 20tk Inf., July 28, '66.) (\st Lt. 20th Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service in the capture of Atlanta, Ga., July 22, 1864. STIMPSON, FRANK E. (idLt. x-jth Inf., Mar. 17, '63.) (\st Lt \^th Inf., May 25, '63.) Brevet Capt., May 5, 1864, for gallant and meritorious service at the bat- tle of the Wilderness, Va. STIVERS, EDWIN J. (2dLt. ipth Inf., July 28, '66.) (ist Lt. 2t,th Inf., Sept. 15, '68.) Brevet ist Lt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service in the bat- tle of Nashville, Tenn. TO THE PRESENT TIME. 533 STOCKTON, HO-WARD. (zdLt. ofOrd., May 23, '64.) (ist Lt. of Ord., May 13, '67.) Brevet ist Lt. and Brevet Capt, September 14, 1866, for meritorious ser- vices. STOCKTON, SAMUEL "W. (2dLt. ifh Cav., May 4, '61.) (Caft. i^h Cav. Mar. 14, '65.) Brevet Capt, June 18, 1864, for gallant and meritorious service during the expedition of General Hunter against Lynchburg, Va. Brevet Maj. and Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service during the war. STOCKTON, THOMAS. [Capt. of Arty., Sept. 10, 'I2.) [Maj. i,%d Inf., April 15, '14.) Retained, May, 1815 (in reorganization under act of March 3, 1815), as Capt. 6th Inf. with brevet of Maj., from April 15, 1814. STODDARD, ASA A. (idLt. <)th Inf., AprilC), 47.) (\st Lt. <}th Inf., Sept. — '47.) Brevet 1st Lt, September 13, 1847, f"'' gallant and meritorious conduct at Chapultepec. STONE, CHARLES P. (Biit. 2dLt. of Ord., July I, '45.) (Col. nth Inf., May 14, '61.) Brevet ist Lt., September 8, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Molino del Rey. Brevet Capt., September 13, 1847, for gallant and merit- orious conduct at Chapultepec. STONE, EBENEZER "W. [2dLt. \zth Inf., May 1 1, '66.) ( \st Lt. 21st Inf., Mar. 26, '68.) Brevet ist Lt. and Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Williamsburg, Va. Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Chancellorsville, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service in the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. STONE, RODERICK. (Bvt. 2dLt. 1st Inf., July I, '59.) ' [Capt. 14M Inf., Oct. 24, '61.) Brevet Maj., February 21, 1862, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Valverde, N. M. STONE, VALENTINE H. [istLt. tfh Arty., May 14, '61.) [Capt cfh Arty., July 28, '66.) Brevet Capt., January 23, 1865. No service given in nomination or com- mission. Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service during the war. STONEMAN, GEORGE. [Bvt. 2dLt. 1st Drags., July 1, '46.) [Col. 21st Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet Col., December 13, 1862, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Fredericksburg, Va. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13,1865, for gallant and meritorious service in the capture of Charlotte, N. C. Brevet Maj.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service in the field during the 534 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 ST. ONGE, SAMUEL E. {zdLt. i6th Inf., April 7, '62.) {.Capt. \6th Inf., Aug. 14, '65.) Brevet Capt., December 31, 1862, for gallant and meritorious service at the. battle of Murfreesboro, Tenn. Brevet Maj., September I, 1864, for gallant and meritorious service during the Atlanta campaign and at the battle of Jones- boro, Ga. STORY, HORACE C. (2.d Lt. Engrs., Mar. 11, '14.) (u^ Lt. Engrs., April 15, '18.) Brevet ist Lt., September 17, 1814, for gallant conduct in the defense of Fort Erie. STORROW, SAMUEL A. {Asst. Surgeon, Aug. J, '61.) {Surgeon {Maj.), June 26, '76.) Brevet Capt. and Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious service during the war. STRANG, EDWARD J. {A. Q. M. (Capt.), Jan. i8, '67.) (A. Q. M. [Capt), Jan. 18, '67.) Brevet Maj., and Brevet Lt.-Col., March 2, 1867, for faithful and meritorious services in his Department during the war. STRICKLAND, LYMAN S. {\st Lt. \6th Inf., May 14, '61.) {Capt. l6tk Inf., May 5, '64.) Brevet Maj., September i, 1864, for gallant and meritorious service during the Atlanta campaign and at the battle of Jonesboro, Ga. STRONG, RICHARD P. {2clLt. yt/i Inf., Feb. 23,- '66.) {istU. /s,th Arty.'' May i, '66.) Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service in the cap- ture of Fort Blakely, Ala. STRYKER, WILLIAM G. {ist Lt. Sig. Corps, Mar. 3, '63.) {\st Lt. Sig. Corps, Mar, 3, ^63.) Brevet Capt., December 5, 1864, for faithful and meritorious service. STUART, JAMES. {Bvt. 2d Lt. Mid. Rifles, July I, '46.) {id Lt. Mtd. Rifles, Oct. 9, '47.) Brevet ist Lt., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. Brevet Capt., September 13, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Chapultepec. STURGEON, SHELDON. {2.d Lt 1st Inf., May 6, '61.) {Capt. 6tA Cav., Apl. 25, '62.) Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service during the war. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service during the war. STURGIS SAMUEL D. {Bvt..2d Lt. 2d Drags., July i, '46.) {Col yt/i Cav., Mar. 6, '69.) Brevet Lt.-Col., August 10, 1861, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Wilson's Creek, Mo. Brevet Col., August 29, 1862, for gallant and meritorious service in the battle of Bull Run (2d), Va. Brevet Brig.-Gen., TO THE PRESENT TIME. 535 March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service in the battle of South .Mountain and Antietam, Md. Brevet Maj.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Fredericksburg, December 13, 1862. SULLIVAN, THOMAS C. [2dLt. istArly., "July i, '56.) {Com. of Sub. [Maj.), Afl. 14, '75.) Brevet Maj., and Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious service during the viar. SULLY, ALFRED. [zdLt. 2d Inf., July 2, '41.) (Col. 2\st Inf., Decxo, '73.) Brevet Lt.-Col., June i, 1862, for gallant and meritorious service at the bat- tle of Fair Oaks, Va. Brevet Col., July i, 1862, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Malvern Hill, Va. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service in the campaign against the Indians in the .North-west, and at the battle of White Stone Hill, D. T. SUMNER, EDWIN V. \2dLt. 2d Inf., Mar. 3, '19.) (Brig.-Gen., Mar. 16, '61.) ' Brevet Lt.-Col., April iS, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Cerro Gordo. Brevet Col., September 8, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct ■atMoHno del Rev. Brevet Maj.-Gen., March 31, i8fi2, for gallant and merit- orious conduct in the battle of Fair Oaks, Va. SUMNER, EDWIN V. {2dLt. 1st Can., Aug. 5, '61.) (Capt. 1st Cav., Sept. 23, '63.) Brevet Maj., May 6, 1864, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Todds's Tavern, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meri- torious service during the war. SUMMERHAYES, J. W. (2dLt. ZZdlnf, Jan. 22, '67.) ( \st Lt. Zth Inf., Dec. 15, '74.) Brevet ist Lt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service at the bat- tle of Balls Bluff, Va. Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Cold Harbor, Va. SUMNER SAMUEL S. (2dLt. tfh Cav., June II, '61.) (Capt. tfh Cav., March 30, '64.) Brevet 1st Lt., June i, 1862, for gallant and meritorious' service at the bat- tle of Fair Oaks, Va. Brevet Capt., September 17, 1862, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Antietam, Md. Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service during the campaign against Vicks- burg. SUTBR, CHARLES R. (2dLt. Engrs., ^ne 17, '62.) (Maj. of Engrs., Oct. 10, '71.) Brevet Capt., July 18, 1863, for gallant and meritorious service at the siege of Morris Island, S. C. Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faithful and merit- orious service during the war. SUTHERLAND, CHARLES. (Asst. Surg-, Aug. 5, '52.) (Surg. (Col.), June 26, '76.) Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious service during the war. Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for meritorious and diligent discharge of duties during the war. 536 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 SUTORIOXTS, ALEXANDER. (2d Lt. 2th Inf., Jan. 8, 1799.) [Capt. Arty., June yi, 1807.) Brevet Maj., June 30, 1817, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. SWIFT, EBENEZER. (Asst. Surg. Aug. 30, '47.) {Surg. (Maj.), May 21, '61.) Brevet Lt-Col. and Brevet Col., March 13 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. Brevet Brig.-Gen., July 20, 1867, for meritorious ser- vices voluntarily rendered during the prevalence of cholera at Fort Harker, Kas. SWIFT, JOSEPH. G. (2d Lt. Engrs., Oct. 12, 'oz.) ■ (Col. of Engrs. July 2^, '12.) Brevet Brig.-Gen., February 19, 1814, for meritorious services. SWORDS, THOMAS. (Bvt. 2dLt. 4tA Inf., July I, '29.) (A. Q. M. G. (Col.), Aug. 3, '61.) Brevet Lt.-CoI., May 30, 1848, for meritorious conduct while serving in the enemy's country. Brevet Brig.-Gen. and Brevet Maj.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for faithful and efficient services in the Quartermaster's Department during the war. SYKES, GEORGE. (Bvt 2dLt. yilnf, July 1, '42.) [Col. 20th Inf, Jan. 20, '68.) Brevet Capt., Auril iS, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Cerro Gordo. Brevet Col., June 2-1, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at Gaines's Mills, Va. Brevet Brisi.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and merit- orious services at Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Maj.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gal- lant and meritorious services in the field during the war. SYMINGTON, JOHN. (■^Lt Ord., Mar. 2, '15.) (Col. of Ordn., Aug. 3, '61.) Brevet Capt., May 17, 1830, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. SYMONDS, HENRY C. (Bvt. 2dLt. 1st Arty., July i, '53.) (Com. of Subsce. (Maj.), Feb. 9, '63.) Brevet Lt.-Col. and Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and merit- orious services during the war. TAGGART, DAVID. (Paymaster (M.ij.), May 30, '61.) (Paymaster (Maj.), May 30, '61.) Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. TALCOTT, ANDREW. (Svt. 2d Lt. Engrs., Jidy 24, 'i&.) (Capt. Engrs., Dec. 22, '20.) Brevet Capt., October i, 1830, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. 34 538 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 TALCOTT, GEORGE. (Zdtt. itjth Inf., July 10, '13.) (Col. of Ordn., Mar. 25, '48.) Brevet Maj., August 5, 1823, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. Bre- vet Brig.-Gen., May 30, 1848, for meritorious conduct, particularly in perform- ing his duties in prosecuting the vfar with Mexico. TALCOTT, GEORGE H. (Bvt. 2d Lt. T,d Arty., July i, '31 .) (Capt. of Ordn., Mar. 3, '47.) Brevet ist Lt., December 31, 1835, far gallant conduct in the war against the Florida Indians. Brevet Maj. and Brevet Lt.-Col., .September 8, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct in the battle of Molino del Rey. TAPLIN, CHARLES. (\st Lt. I2th Inf., Apt. 9, '47.) i,Capt., I2tk Inf., Mar. — , '48.) Brevet Capt., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct in the bafttles of Contreras and Churubusco. TARDY, JOHN A, (Bvt. 2d Lt. Engrs., July i, '60.) {.Capt. Engrs., Mar. 3, '63.) Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. TARLTON,ELISHA "W. {2d Lt. id Cav., Aug. 5, '61.) {Capt. 3d Cav., Oct. 27, '63.) Brevet Maj., November 15, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services in ac- tion at Tuseumbia, Ala. TASSIN, AUGUSTUS G. {Capt. \2th Inf., July 28, '66.) {Capt. 12th Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Mission Ridge, Tenn. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 2, 1867, for gallant and merit- orious services in the capture of Atlanta. Brevet Col., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Nashville. TAYLOR, ALFRED B. {2d Lt. tfh Cav., Oct. 31, '63.) {Capt. -ifh Cav., June 22, '69.) Brevet Capt., April 9, 1865, for gallant and meritorious conduct during the campaign terminating with the surrender of General Lee's army. TAYLOR, FRANCIS. {Bvt. 2dLt. ifli Arty., July i, '25.) {Major 1st Arty., Mar. 3, '5^.) Brevet Maj., April 18, 1847, for galknt and meritorious conduct at Cerro Gordo. Brevet Lt.-Col., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Churubusco. I TAYLOR, FRANCE B. {2d Lt. 1st Arty., Aug. 5, '61.) {Capt. 1st Arty., Feb. 1, '66.) Brevet Capt., July 8, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the cap- ture of Port Hudson, La. IBrevet Maj., September 19, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Winchester, Va. TAYLOR, GEORGE. Asst. Sur., Apl. 1, '56.) {Surgeon (Maj.), Aug. 27, '62.) Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during he war. TO THE PRESENT TIME. 539 TAYLOR. GEORGE. {id Lt. id Arty., July i, '37.) ( Capt. yi Arty., Feb. 16, '47.) Brevet Capt., March 1, 1842, for gallant and meritorious services in the war against the Florida Indians. Brevet Maj., October 9, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct in the battle of Huamantla, Mex. TAYLOR, JOSEPH H. (Bvt. idLt. 1st Cav., July 1, '56.) (A. A. G. (Maj.), Mar. 30, '66.) ■ Brevet Maj., June i, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Fair Oaks, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., September 17, 1862, for gallant and merit- orious services at the battle of Antietam, Md. Brevet Col., August 13, i866, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. TAYLOR, JOHN McL. [2dLt. 2d Arty., Mar. 3, '48.) (Com. of Sub. (Maj.), Feb. 9, '6l.) .Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious service during the war. Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services in his department during the war. TAYLOR, JOSEPH P. (ylLt. 2%th Inf., May 20, '13.) (Com. Gen. of Sub. (Brig.-Gen.), Feb. 9, '63.) Retained, May, 1816 (in reorganization under the Act of March 3, 1815), as 2d Lt. State Artillery, with Brevet of ist Lt., from July 15, 1814 (date of ap- pointment as 1st Lt. 28th Infantry). Brevet Col., May 30, 1848, for meritorious conduct, particularly in performing his duties in prosecuting the war with Mexico. TAYLOR, LEWIS. (Asst. Surg., Mar. 3, '57.) (Surgeoti (Maj.), Aug. 14, '63.) Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. TAYLOR, OLIVER H. P. (Bvt 2d Lt. \st Drags., July i,_'46.) (1st Lt. ist Drags., Feb. 21, '53.) Brevet ist Lt., February 4, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Em- budo and Taos, Mex. Brevet Capt., March 16, 1848, for gallant and merit- orious conduct at Santa Cruz de Rosales. TAYLOR, ZACHARY. (ist Lt. -jth Inf., May 3, '08.) (Major-Gen., June 29, '46.) Brevet Maj., September 5, 1812, for gallant conduct in the defence of Fort Harrison. Brevet Brig.-Gen., December 25, 1837, for distinguished services in the battle of Okeechobee with Stminole Indians. Brevet Maj.-Gen., May 28, 1846, for gallant conduct and distinguished services at Palo Alto and Re- saca de la Palma on May 8 and 9, 1846. TELFORD, JOHN G. (2d Lt. \T,th Inf., Mar. 21, '66.) (ist Lt. J,\st Inf., Nov. I, '67.) Brevet ist Lt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Lewisburg, Va., May 23, 1862. Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gal- lant and meritorious services in the action at Cumberland Gap in 1863. TEMPLE, WILLIAM J. (Capt. \-]th Inf., Aug. 5, '61.) (Capt. I'jth Inf., Aug. 5, '61.) Brevet Maj., May 3, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Chancellorsville, Va. 540 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 TEN BROECE, PETER G. S. {Asst. Stirg.,Dec. 13, '47.) (Surgeon (Major), May 21, '61.) Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. TEN EYCK, TBNODOR. (Capf. \%th Inf., Feb. 19, '62.) [Capt. \Wi Inf., Feb. 19, '62.) Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. TERRY, ALFRED H. [Brig.-Gen., Jan. 15, '65.) (Brig.-Gen., Jan. 15, '05.) Brevet Maj. -Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services in the capture of Wilmington, N. C. THATCHER, HORACE K. (Caft. \ifh Inf., May 14, '61.) (Capt. 14M Inf., May 14, '61.) Brevet Maj., August i, 1864, for gallant services at the battles of North Anna, Bethesda Church, &c. THAYER, SYLVANUS. [id Lt. Engrs., Feb. 23, '08.) (Col. of Engrs., Mar. 3, %■>,:) Brevet Maj., February 20, 1815, for distinguished and meritorious services at Norfolk, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 3, 1823, for distinguished and merit- orious services. Brevet Col., March 3, 1833, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for long and faithful services. THBAKBR, HUGH A. (istLt. 16th Inf., May 14, '61.) (Capt. i6th Inf,July 28, '64.) Brevet Capt., November 25, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Mission Ridge, Tenn. THIBMAN, AUGUST. (2d Lt. \2th Inf., Nov. 6, '62.) (ist Zt. \2th Inf., April 10, '63.) Brevet Capt., August i, 1864, for gallant services at the battle of .Spottsyl- vania, Va. Brevet Maj., August 18, 1864, for gallant services at the battle on the Weldon Rail Road, Va. THOM, GEORGE. (Bvt. 2d Lt. Top. Engrs., July \, '39.) (Lt.-Col. Engrs., July 10, '66.) Brevet Lt.-Col., Brevet Col., and Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. THOMAS, CHARLES. (idLt. Ord., Aug. 13, '19.) (A. Q. M. G. (Col.), Aug i, '56.) Brevet Lt.-Col., May 30, 1848, for meritorious conduct while serving in the enemy's country. Brevet Brig.-Gen., July 5, 1864, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. Brevet Maj. -Gen., March 13, 1865, for faithful, merit- orious and distinguished services in the Quartermaster's Department during the war. THOMAS, CHARLES "W. (Bvt. 2dLt. itk Inf., July i, '55.) (A. Q. M. (Capt.), June 14, '61.) Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. TO THE PRESENT TIME. S4I THOMAS, EVAN. (2d Lt. i^h Arty., April g, '61.) (Capt. 6fh Arty., Aug. 31, '64.) Brevet Capt., December 13, 1862, for gallant aud meritorious services at the battle of Fredericksburg, Va. Brevet Maj., July 3, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. THOMAS, GEORGE H. [idLt. id Arty., July i, '40.) (Maj.-Gen.., Dec. IJ, '64.) Brevet ist Lt., November 6, 1S41, for gallant and good conduct in the -vizx against the Florida Indians. Brevet Capt., Septemljer 23, 1846, for gallant conduct at Monterey, Mexico. Brevet Maj., February 23, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct in the battle of Buena Vista. THOMAS, HENRY G. {Capt. wth Inf., Aug. 5, '61.) [Maj. ifh Inf., Oct. 22, '76.) Brevet Maj., May 12, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Spottsylvania, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., July 30, 1864, for gallant and meritori- ous services in front of Petersburg, Va. Brevet Col. and Brevet Brig. -Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. THOMAS, LORENZO. {2d Lt. ifh Inf., July i, '23.) [Adjt.-Gen. [Brig. Gen.), Aug. 3, '61.) Brevet Lt.-Col.,. September 23, 1846, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Monterey. Brevet Brig.-Gen , May 7, 1861. No service mentioned in body of commission. Brevet Maj.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. THOMAS, LORENZO, Jr. {2d Lt. 1st Arty., April 24, '61.) [Capt. 1st Arty., Nov. 4, '(iT,.) Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. THOMAS, PHILIP K. {2dLt. yl Cav., Oct. 24, '61.) {Capt. ^d Cav., July 28, '65.) Brevet Capt., July 4, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services during the siege of Vicksburg, Miss. THOMPSON, A. B. {dipt. i8t/t Inf., Aug. s, '61.) {Capt. i?,t/i Inf., Aug. 5, '61.) Brevet Maj., December 3:, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Murfreesboro, Tenn. THOMPSON, ALEXANDER R. {2dLt. 6th Inf., Jan. 3, '12.) {Lt.-Col, 6th Inf., Sept. 6, '37.) Brevet Maj., May i, 1824, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. THOMPSON, HENRY A. {2dLt. Arty., July i, '19.) {Capt. ifh Arty., Aug. 31, '36.) Brevet Capt., December 31, 1832, for lo years' faithful service in one grade. THOMPS ;N, JAMES. {Bvt. 2d Lt. 2d Arty., July r, '51.) {Capt. 2d Arty., June 14, '61.) Brevet Maj., June 30, 1862, for gallant and meritorious sei'vices at the battle of Glendale, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col, March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Cliickamau^a, Ga. 542 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 THOMPSO JAMBS. {2d Li. 4i/i Arty., Oct. 22, "62.) ( Capt. ^th /nf, Feb. 25, '67.) Brevet ist Lt., January 30, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the siege of Suffolk, Va. Brevet Capt., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. THOMPSON, JOHN A. (2d Lt. 1st Drags., June 25, '55.) (Capt. ifh Cav., May 14, '61.) Brevet Maj., June 26, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Hoover's Gap, Tenn. THOMPSON, J. MILTON. (2dLt. ■i^th Inf., July 28, '66.) (ist Lt. 24M Inf., Niw. 4, '67!) Brevet ist Lt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at James' Island, S. C. ■ ' THOMPSON, JOHN W. (2d Lt. I4ti Inf., Mar. 12, '12.) (ist Lt. lifh Inf., June 26, '13.) Retained, May, 181 5 (in reorganization under act of that year), as 2d Lt. of Ordnance, with brevet of ist Lt. from June 26, 1813. THOMPSON, LEWIS. (2d Lt. 2d Cav., Fed. i<), '62.) (Capt. 2d Cav., July 2%, '66.) Brevet Capt, June 21, 1863, for gallant and meritorious service in action at Upperville, Va. Brevet Maj., September 25, 1865, for meritorious services during the war. THOMPSON, PHILIP R. (Bvt. 2d Lt. 1st Drags., July 1, '35.) (Capt. 1st Drags,, June 30, '46.) Brevet Maj., February 28, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at the battle of Sacramento, Mexico. THOMPSON, "WILLIAM. (Capt. -jth Cav., July 28, '66.) (Caft. -jth Cav., July 28, '66.) Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in action at Prairie Grove. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in action at Bayou Meter, Ark. THOMSON, WILLIAM. (Asst. Surg., Aug. S, '60.) (Asst. Surg., Aug. 5, '60.) Brevet Capt. and Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. THORN, HERMANN. \2dLt.2d Inf.,0ct\l.'\6.) (1st Lt. 2d Inf., July— .'i,^.) Brevet Capt., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at the battles of Contreras and Churubusco. THORNTON, ARTHUR W. ( 2d Lt. ifh Inf., Nmi. 30, ' 19. ) ( Capt. ifh Inf., Nov. 28, 35.) Brevet Capt., April 25, 1833, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. THORNTON, W^ILLIAM A. (Bvt. 2dLt. 1st Arty., July 1, '25.) (Col. ofOrdn., Sept. 15, '63.) Brevet Maj., May 30, 1848, for- meritorious conduct. Brevet Brig.-Gen,, TO THE PRESENT TIME. 543 March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious service in the Ordnance Depart- ment. THROCKMORTON, CHARLES B. (zdLt. Ath Arty., Mar. 16, '61.) (Capt. i,th Arty., July 18, '64.) Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious conduct during .the war. TIDBALL, JOHN C. {Bvt. zdLt. yl Arty., July I, '48.) {Maj. zd Arty., Feb. 5, '67.) I Brevet Maj . June 27, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gaines's Mill, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col , September 17, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Antietam, Md. Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the rebel attack on Fort Steadman, Va. Brevet Brig., Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services in the field during the war. TILFORD, JOSEPH G. [Bvt. 2dLt. Mtd. Rifles, July i, '51.) (Maj. yth Cav., Nov. 14, '67.) Brevet Maj., February 21, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Valverde, N. M. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful ser- vices during the war. TILSON, JOHN. [Caft. ia.) Brevet Maj. and Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious ' services during the wrar. VANVALZAH, DAVID D. [istLt. izth Inf., May 14, '61.) [Capt. i^th Inf., Aug. lo, '64.) . Brevet Capt., August i, 1864, for gallant service at the battle of the Wilderness, Va., and during the campaign before Richmond. VAN VLIET, FREDERICK. [idLt yl Cav., Aug. 5, '6i.) [Capt. yl Cav., July 28, '66.) Brevet Capt., August i, 1864, for gallant and meritorious service in the bat- . ties of the campaign from the Rapidan to Petersburg. Brevet Maj., April 8, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service during the siege of Mobile, Ala. Brevet Lt.-Col., September 30, 1865, for meritorious service during the war. VAN VLIET, STEWART. , {2dLt. -id Arty., July I, '40.) (A. Q. M. G. (Col.), June 6, '72.) Brevet Lt.-Col., Brevet Col. and Brevet Brig.-Gen., October 28, 1864, for faithful and meritorious service during the war. Brevet Maj.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for faithful and distinguished service in the Quartermaster's Depart- ment during the war. VEDDER, SIMON C. \2dLt. 2%th Inf, Mar. 7, '67.) [zd I.t. 2%th Inf., Mar. 7, '67.) Brevet ist Lt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Gaines's Mills, Va. VEIL, CHARLES H. (zd Lt. 1st Cav., April 7, '64.) (1st Lt. 1st Cav., July 1, '64.) Brevet ist Lt., May 6, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the bat- tle of Todd's Tavern, Va. Brevet Capt., April i, 1865, for gallant and merit- orious services, at the battle of Five Forks, Va. Brevet Maj., April i, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Five Forks, Va. VBRNAY, JAXvIBS D. [zd Lt. l^th Inf., April 28, '66.) ( 1st Lt. i^fh Inf., July 1 2, '67.) Brevet Capt., July 12, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. VERNON, GEORGE R. [zdLt. nth Inf., Feb. 27, '63.) (Capt. lifh Inf., May 24, '67.) Brevet Capt., October 27, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services in the battles of Popalr Spring Church and Hatcher's Run, Va. 552 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 VBRPLANCK, ABRAM G. (2d Lt. yl Arty., Feb. 23, '65.) (ut- Lt. yl Arty., Aug: 13, '66.) Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services during the campaign of Atlanta, Ga. Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and merit- orious services during Maj. -Gen. Sherman's campaigns in Georgia and North and South Carolina. VIBLE, CHARLES D. (2d Lt. 1st Inf., Oct. 24, '61.) [Capt. lotk Cav., April 22, '6S ) Brevet Capt., July 4, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services during the siege of Vicksburg, Miss. VINCENT, ALBERT O. [2d Lt. 2d Arty., Oct. 24, '61.) (\st Lt. 2d Arty., Aug. 11, '62.) Brevet Capt., September 17, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Antietam, Md. Brevet Maj., July 3, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Lt.-Col., November 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services in connection with the mustering out of service and disbanding of the volunteer army of the United States. VINCENT, THOMAS M. (Bvt. zdLt. 2d Arty , July i, '53.) (Asst. Adjt.-Gen. [Maj.], July 17, '62.) Brevet Lt.-Col. and Brevet Col., September 24, 1864, for meritorious and faithful services during the war. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for faith- ful and meritorious services during the war. VINTON, DAVID H. [Bvt. 2dLt. 1st Arty , July i, '22.) {A. Q. M. G. [Col), July 29, '66.) Brevet Col., Brevet Brig.-Gen., and Brevet Maj.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. VINTON, JOHN R. {2d Lt. Arty., July 17, '17.) (Capt. T,d Arty., Dec. z8, '35.) Brevet Capt., September 30, 1829, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. Brevet Maj., September 23, 1846, for gallant conduct at Monterey. VIVBN, JOHN L. (2d Lt. 12111 Inf., Tvi. 23, '66.) (Capt. \2th Inf., Mar. y,''Ti-] Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. VOGDES, ISRAEL. {2d Lt. ut Arty., July i, '37.) (Col. 1st Arty., Aug. 1, '63.) Brevet Brig.-Gen., April 9, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services in the field during the war. VOLLUM, EDTVARD P. (Asst. Surg., M.iy 31, '53.) (Surgeon, {Maj ), May 12, '62.) Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. VON BLUCHER, GUSTAV. (1st Lt. i6tli Inf., Jin 22, '67.) (ut Lt. i6//« Inf., Jan. 22, '67.) Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the bat- tle of Chancellorsville, Va. Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and merit- orious services in the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. TO THE PRESENT TIME. 553 VON HERRMANN, CHARLES J. [Caft. 33^/ Inf., July 28, '65.) e [Capt. ^th Inf., July 28, '66. ) Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the siege of Port Hudson, La. VON MICHALQ-WSKI, T. B. [2dLt. \st Arty., Oct. 28, '61.) [ist Lt. ut Arty., May 28, '63.) Brevet ist Lt., September ly, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Antietam, Md. Brevet Capt., June 24, 1864, for gallant and merit- orious services in action near St. Mary's Church, Va. VON SCHIRACH, FREDERICK C. (utU. Hid Inf., July 28, '66.) [ut Lt. A^d Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the bat- tle of Bull Run (2d), Va. VON SCHRADER, ALEXANDER. {2dLt. nth Inf., July 28, '66.) (Maj. :i<)t/t Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet Lt.-Col., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Stone River, Tenn. Brevet Col., March 2, 1867, for gallant and merit- orious service at the battle of Jonesboro, Ga. VORIS, SAMUEL P. {zdLt. iph Inf., May II, '66.) (2d Lt. lyth Inf., May 11, '65.) Brevet ist Lt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Stone River, Tenn. Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Chickamauga, Ga. Brevet Maj>, March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Mission Ridge, Tenn. VOSE, JOSIAH H. (Capt. 2ist Inf., April 9, '12.) t««) (Col. 4th Inf., Jan. 31, '42.) Retained, Mav, 1815 (in reorganization under Act of March 3, 1815), asCapt. 5th Infantry, with brevet of Maj. from August 4, 1814 (date of his appointment as Maj. 2ist Infantry). VOSE, WILLIAM P. (2dLt. 2d Arty., June 13, '64.) (ist Lt. 2d Arty., Mar. 8, '65.) Brevet Capt., March 29, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services in action at the siege of Petersburg, Va. WADE, HENRY P. (idLt. tfh Cav., May 4, '65.) {Capt. %th Cav., Mar. 7, '67.) Brevet ist Lt., Brevet Capt, and Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in action at Saltville, Va. WADE, JAMES F. (utLt. dth Cav., May 14, '61.) (Maj. <)ih Cav., July 28, "66.) Brevet Capt., June 9, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Beverly Ford, Va. Brevet Maj., December 19, 1864, for gallant and merit- orious services in action at Marion, East Tenn. Brevet Lt.-Col. and Brevet Col., March 13, 1865,'for gallant and meritorious services during the war. 554 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 "WADE, RICHARD D. A. ■ [2d Lt. Arty., Oct. 27, '20.) [Capt. jd Arty., Dec. 26, '40.) Brevet Mai., November 6, 1841, for gallant and successful services in the war against the Florida Indians. Brevet Lt.-Col., September 8, 1847, for gal- lant and meritorious conduct at the battle of El Molino del Rey. ■WADE, ■WILLIAM. {\st Lt. Ordn., Mar. 12, '13.) (Capt. Arty., Feb. 9, '15.) Brevet Maj., February 9, 1825, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. , ■WAGER, PHILIP. {.Ens. izt/i Inf., Mar. 12, '12.) (Capt. ifh Inf., May 8, '18.) Brevet Maj., May 8, 1S28, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. ■WAGGAMAN, GEORGE G. [Bvt. zd Lt. 1st Arty., July i, '35.) . [Com. of Sub. (Capt), Dec. A '41.) Brevet Maj., September 23, 1846, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Palo Alto, Resaca de la Palma, and Monterey. ■WAGNER, CLINTON. [Asst. Surg., Oct. II, '60.) (Surg {Maj.), July 28, (>(>.) Brevet Maj. and Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. ^ ■WAGNER, HENR^Sr. (2dLt. nth Inf., Feb. 19, '63.) (Capt. ist Cav., Jan. 27, '69.) Brevet ist Lt. and Brevet Capt., April 2, 1S65, fur gallant and meritorious services in front of Petersburg, Va. ■WAGNER, JEAN P. (zdLt. \zth Inf., Mar. 10, '63.) [ist Lt. \zth Inf., July 17, '63.) Brevet Capt., May 5, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of the 'Wilderness, Va. ■WAGNER, ORLANDO G. [Bvt. zd Lt. Top. Engrs., July 1, '59.) (ist Lt. Top. Engrs., Aug. 3, '61.) Brevet Capt., September ii, 1861, for gallant and meritorious services in the campaign in Western Virginia. Brevet Maj., April 17, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the siege of Yorktown, Va., where he was mortally wounded while reconnoitering the enemy's works. ■WAGONER, JOSEPH J. ^ (zd Lt. l^tk Inf., Nov. 20, '61.) [Capt. l^t/ilnf, June 13, '65.) Brevet Capt., September i, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services during the Atlanta campaign. Brevet Maj., June 13, 1865, f ir meritorious services in the battle before Atlanta, Ga. v WAINWRIGHT, ROBERT A. [Bvt. zdLt. tfh Inf., July i,' 35.) (Lt.-Col. of Ordn. Sept. 15, '63.) Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful service in the Ordnance Depart- TO THE PRESENT TIME. 555 WAITB, CARLOS A. (2dLt.2d/nf.,yan.zS,'20.) i (Col. \st Inf., June t^,'(>o.) Brevet Lt.-Col., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Contreras and Churubusco. Brevet Col., September 8, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Molino del Rey. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for long and faithful service in the army. WALBACH, JOHN DE B. (irfZA Cav., Jan. 8, 1799.) {Col. ifh Arty., Mar. 19, '42.) Brevet Maj., November II, 1813, for gallant conduct at the battles of Crys- ler's Farm and Lawrence, U. C. Brevet Lt.-Col., May i, 18 15, for meritorious services. Brevet Col., May i, 1821, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. Brevet Brig.-Gen., November 11, 1823, for meritorious services. WALCOTT, WILLIAM H. (\stLt. \^th Inf., May 14, '61.) (Capt. lyth Inf., Feb. '14, '64.) Brevet Capt., May 3, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Chancellorsville, Va. Brevet Maj., July 2, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. - Brevet Lt.-Col. and Brevet Col. March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the vfar. ' WALES, JOHN P. [Caft. Yith Inf., May 14, '61.) (Capt. \-]th Inf., May 14, '61.) Brevet Maj., August 18, 1864, for gallant services during the operations on the Weldon Rail Road, Va. WALKER, CHARLES J. [Bvt zdLt. id Cav., July i, '57.) (Capt. 2d Cav., Feb. 15, '62.) Brevet Maj., April 15, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services. WALKER, FERGUS. [Capt. \id Inf., July 28, '66.) (Capt. 1st Inf., July 28, '66.) '' Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Chancellorsville, Va. WALKER, JOHN G. (istLt. Mtd. Rifles, May 27, '46.) (Capt. Mtd. Rifles, June 30, '51.) Brevet Capt., August i, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at San Juan de los Llanos, Mex. W^ALKER, JOHN H. (ist Lt. \ifh Inf., May iSn'^i-i..) (Capt. 14th. Inf., May 6, 'St,.) Brevet Capt., June 27, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gaines's Mills, Va. Brevet Maj , September 17, 1862, for gallant and merit- orious services at the battle of Antietam, Md. WALKER, LEICESTER. {2dLt. (fh Cav., May 28, '61.) , [Capt. tfh .Cav., Nov. i, '63.) Brevet Capt., June 9, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Beverly Ford, Va. Brevet Maj., May 11, 1864, for gallant and meritorious jServices at the battle of Yellow Tavern, Va. WALKER, MARK. \zdZt. i^th Inf., Feb. 23, '66.) (ist Lt. i<)th Inf., Feb. 23, '66.) Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for good conduct throughout the wrar. 5S6 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 'WALKER, MOSES B. (dipt. 12th Inf., Aug. 23, '61.) {Capt. 12th Tnf., Aug. 23, '61.) Brevet Maj. and Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. "WALKER, THOMAS "W. (2d Lt. yl Inf., ^uly i, '56.) ( Capt. -^d Inf., May 20, '61,) Brevet Maj., June 27, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gaines's Mills, Va. WALKER, AVILLIAM H. T. kBvt. 2d Lt. dth Inf., July i, '37.) (Maj. loth Inf. Mar. 3, '55.) Brevet ist Lt., December 25, 1837, for gallant and good conduct in the war against the Florida Indians. Brevet Maj., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct in the battles of Contreras and Churubusco. Brevet Lt.- Col., September 8, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct in the battle of Molino del Rey. "WALKER, "WILLIAM S. (1st Lt. Volts., April %'i,-].) (1st Lt. Volts., April <),'\T.) Brevet Capt., September 13, 1S47, for gallant and meritorious conduct at the battle of Chapultepec. "WALL, RICHARD. (2d Lt. 2d Cdv., July 17, '62.) (Capt. yi Cav., Dec. 24, '66.) Brevet ist Lt., November 15, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services in action near Tuscumbia, Ala. "W ALLEN, HENR"5r D. (Bvt. 2dLt. Z'ilnf, Jtly^^, '4°-) (Col. 2d Inf., Feb. 19, '73.) Brevet Lt.-Col, and Brevet Col., February 23, 1865, for m2ritorious services rendered in New Mexico during the war. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. "WARD, CHARLES. (yl Lt. Ordn., May 17, '16.) (Capt. ifh Arty., June '36.) B.evet Capt., July 20, 1S32, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. AVARD. HENRY C. (2d Lt uth Inf., Feb. 23, '66.) (ist Lt. 11th Inf., Feb. 23, '65.) Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in action at Fort Steadman, Va., March 24, 1865. "WARD, JAMES N. (Bvt. 2dLt. eth Inf., July 1, '45.) (Capt. yilnf, Sept. 28, '57.) Brevet ist Lt., April 18, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Cerro Gordo. "WARD, ROBERT J. (2d Lt. 1st Cav., June I, '63.) (\st Lt 1st Cav., June 12, '64.) Brevet ist Lt., May 6, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Todd's Tavern, Va. Brevet Capt., June 12, 1864, for gallant and meritorioaj> services at the battle of Trevilliau ation, Va, TO THE PRESENT TIME. 557 "WARD, THOMAS. (zdLt. 1st Arty., June ir, '63.) {Capt. xst Arty., Nov. i, '76.) Brevet ist Lt., June 3, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Cold Arbor, Va. Brevet Capt., March 13, 1865, tor good conduct and gal- lant services during the war. WARNER, CHARLES N. [Bvt. 2d Lt. 2d Arty., yniie 17, '62.) (\st Lt. ifh Arty., May n, '64.) Brevet ist Lt., July 3, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Capt., April 2, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the capture of Selma, Ala. ■WARNER, ED^WARD H. [Bvt. id Lt. 1st Arty., July i, 'S7-) ( C"pt- Z^ '^rty., July 28, '66.) Brevet Capt., July 3, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the siege of Petersburg, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for good conduct and gallant services during the war. ■WARNER, JAMES M. [Bvt. 2dLt. lath Inf., July i, '60.) [Capt. Wi Inf., Oct. 8, '64.) Brevet Maj., Brevet Lt.-Col., and Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the war. ' Brevet Brig.-Gen., April 9, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services in the field during the war. ^WARNER, ■WILLIAM H. [2dLt. 1st Arty., July I, '36.) {\st Lt. Top. Engrs., Sept. I, '41.) Brevet Capt, December 6, 1846, for gallant and meritorious services in Cali- fornia. ■WARREN, GOUVERNEUR K. [Bvt. 2d Lt. Top. Engrs., July I, '50.) (Maj. Engrs., June 25, '64.) Brevet Lt.-Col., June 27, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gaines's Mills, Va. Brevet Col., July 4, 1863, for gallant and merit- orious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the .battle of Bristow .Station, Va. Brevet Maj-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services in the field during the war. ■WARREN, LUCIUS H. {\st Lt. 29th Inf., July 28, '66.) ( Capt. 39/// Inf., July 31, '67.) Brevet Maj. and Brevet Lt.-Col., July 31, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the siege of Petersburg, Va. ■WARREN, LYMAN H. {idLt. i-]tk Inf., Oct. 13, '62.) (Capt. l-]th Inf., Oct. 25, '65.) Brevet Capt., July 2, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. "WASHINGTON, ED^WARD C. [Capt. \->fh Inf., May 14, '61.) (Capt. \Tfh Inf., May 14, '61.) Brevet Maj., May 20, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services in action before Vicksburg, Miss. 5-58 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 WASHINGTON, JOHN M. (ylLt. Arty., July 17, '17.) (Maj. yi Arty., Feb. 16, '47.) Brevet Capt., May 23, 1830, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. Bre- vet Lt.-Col., February 23, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct in the bat- tle of Buena Vista. WATERS, JOSEPH G. {2dLt. iffh Inf., Feb. 23, '66.) [\st Lt. zyl/nf., Nov. i, '66.) Brevet Capt, March 2, 1867, for gallant conduct at the battle of Franklin, Tenn., Nov. 30, 1864. WATERS, WILLIAM E. {Asst. Surg., April 16, '62.) (Asst. Surg., April 16, '62.) Brevet Capt. and Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the vifar. W^ ATKINS, LOUIS D. (irf Lt. \ifh Inf., May 14, '61.) {Lt.-Col 20th Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet Maj., January 8, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services in the ex- pedition to East Tennessee under Brig.-Gen. Carter, U. S. V. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 5, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Thomp- son's Station, Tenn. Brevet Col,, June 24, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Lafayette, Ga. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious conduct in defence of Resaca, Ga. , WATMOUGH, JOHN G. (■^d Lt. of Arty., Sept. 22, '\y) (fid Lt. of Arty., April 19, '14.) Brevet ist Lt., August 15, 1814, for gallant conduct in defence of Fort Erie. WATSON, BENJAMIN. (2d Lt. 2t,th Inf., Mar. 12, '12.), (Capt 2tjlh Inf., Aug. 15. '13.) Brevet MajT July 25, 18 r4, for gallant conduct at the battle of Niagara. W^ ATS ON, MALE ONE F. {2d Lt. 1st Cav., May 6, '61.) (Capt. yth Arty., Mar. 9, '66.) Brevet Capt., June 27, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the bat- tle of Gaines's Mills, Va. Brevet Maj., July 2, 1863, for gallant and merit- orious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. WATTS, GEORGE. (%d Lt. Light Drags., Mar. 18, '13.) (2d Lt. Light Drags., Aug. I, '13.) Brevet ist Lt., July 5, 1814, for gallant conduct at the battle of Chippewa. W^AYNE, HENRY C. (2dLt. i^th Arty., July i, '38.) (A. Q. M. (Capt.), May 11, '46.) Brevet Maj., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. WEBB, ALEXANDER S. (Bvt 2d Lt Arty., July i, '55.) (Lt.-Col 6^h Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet Maj., July 3, 1863, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Lt.-Col., October 11, 1863, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Bristow Station, Va. Brevet Col., May 12, 1864, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Spottsylvania, Va. Brevet TO THE PRESENT TIME. " 5_'9 Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service in the > — 'pa'gn terminating with the surrender of Gen. Lee. Brevet Maj.-Gen., J ; r.h 13 1865, for gallant and meritorious service during the war. 'W^EBB, CHARLES A. [Capi. 13M Inf., Atig. 5, '61.) (Capt. 22cl Inf., Aug. 5, '61.) Brevet Maj., July 4, 1863, for gallant and meritorious service at the siege of Vicksburg; Miss. WEBB, NATHANIEL S. (Capt. ^h Inf., April 9, '47.) [Capt. gth Inf., April 9, '47.) Brevet Maj., September 13, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at the battle of Chapultepec. WEBB, ROBERT W. (zdLt. 40iA Inf., Mar. 7, '67.) (zd Lt. ipth Inf., Mar. 7, '67.) . Brevet 1st Lt., March 7, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service during the war. WEBB, WILLIAM W. (idLt. i,th Caa., May 17, '61.) [Capt. ifh Cav., July 28, '66.) Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service in the Atlan- ta campaign. WEBSTER, AMOS. (idLt. tfh Cav., Mar. 7, '67.) {\st Lt. tfh Cav., June 9, '68.) Brevet 1st Lt, Brevet Capt. and Brevet Maj., March 7, 1867, for faithful and meritorious service during the war. WEBSTER, JOHN G. [idU. ifh Can., Feb. 19, '63.) (ij-^ Lt. i,th Cav., —. —, '66.) Brevet ist Lt., December 16, 1864, for gallant and meritorious service in pursuit of rebel forces under Gen. Hood. Brevet Capt., April 2, 1865, for gal- lant and meritorious service at the capture of Selma, Ala. Brevet Maj., April 2, 1865, for gallantry during pursuit of Hood after the battle of Nashville, and in the charge of his regiment against the earthworks at Selma, Ala. WEBSTER, LUCIAN B. (Bvt. 2d Lt. yl Arty., July i, '23.) (Maj. ifh Arty., Aug. 3, '52.) Brevet Maj., September 23, 1846, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Monterey. Brevet Lt.-Col., February 23, 1847, for gallant and meritorious qonduct at Buena Vista. WEBSTER, WARREN. (Assti Surg., June 23, '60.) (Surgeon [Maj.), July 28, ''(£^ Brevet Capt., May 3, 1863, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Chancellorsville, Va. Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faithful and merit- orious service during the war. Brevet Lt.-Col., September 28, 1866, for meri- torious and distinguished service at Hart's Island and David's Island, N. Y. H., where cholera prevailed. WEDEMEYER, W. G. '"""^ {2dLt. 16th Inf., Aug. 13, '62) [Capt. idth Inf., Nan. 16, '65.) Brevet Capt., September 20, 1863, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Chickamauga, Ga. 560 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 ■WEEDS, JAMES F. (Asst. Surg., May 28, '61.) [Asst. Surg., May 28, '61.) Brevet Capt. and Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious service during the war. •WEEKS, GEORGE H. [Bvt. 2d Lt. 1st Arty., July i, 57.) (Qrmr. (Maj), May 29, '76.) Brevet Maj. and Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious service in the Quartermaster's Department during the war. ■WEIR, GULIAN V. {zd Lt. tfh Arty., May 14, '61.) (Capt. ^th Arty, Nov. 10, '74.) Brevet Tst Lt. . July i, 1862, for gallant and meritorious service dliring the Peninsula campaign in Virginia. Brevet Capt., December 13, 1862, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Fredericksburg, Va. ■WEIR, JAMES ■W. {\st Lt. \ifh Inf., Oct. 26,- '61.) (Capt. ii^th Inf., Aug. 14, '65.) Brevet Capt., August 18, 1864, for gallant service at the battle on the Weldon Rail Road, Va. ■WEIR, THOMAS B. {ist Lt. -jth Cav., yuly2?,, '66.) (Capt.yth Cav.,JiilyT,\, '67.) Brevet Maj., July 31, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service in the battle of Farmington, Tenn. Brevet Lt.-Col., July 31, 1867, for gallant and merit- orious service in the engagement with Forrest near Ripley, Miss., December i, 1863. ■WEITZEL, GODFRE^y. (Bvt. 2d Lt. Engrs., July I, '55.) {Maj. Etigrs., Aug. 8, '66.) Brevet Maj., Octolier 27, 1S63, for gallant and meritorious service at the bat- tle of Thibodeaux, La. Brevet Lt.-Col., July 8, 1863, for gallant and meritorious service at the capture of Port Hudson, La. Brevet Ci 1., September 29. 1864, for gallant and meritorious service at the capture of Fort Harrison, Va. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service in the cam- paign terminating with the surrender of Gen. Lee. Brevet Maj. -Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service in the field during the war. ■WELD, CHARLES T. (\st Lt. \-]th Inf., May 14, '61.) (\st Lt. \-]th Inf., May 14, '61.) Brevet Capt., May 3, 1863, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Chancellorsville, Va. ■WELDY, SETH. (zdLt. 1st Inf, May 12, '62.) (Capt. 2T,d Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet ist Lt., July 4, 1863, for gallant and meritorious service during the siege of Vicksburg, Miss. ■WELLS, DANIEL T. (zd Lt. Wi Inf., Feb. 19, '63.) (Capt. %th Inf., Dec. 15, '74.) Brevet 1st Lt., September 29, 1864, for gallant and meritorious service in the assault upon Fort Harrison, Va. Brevet Capt., April 2, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service in front of Petersburg, Va. Brevet Maj., April 2, 1865, for gallant conduct at Fort Harrison, Va., and the succeeding engagements at TO THE PRESENT TIME. 561 ■WELLS, ELIJAH R. {2J Lt. 2d Cav., July 17, '62.) ( Capt. 2d Cav., May 7, '67. ) Brevet ist Lt., June 9, 1863, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Beverly Ford, Va. Brevet Capt., October 19, 1864, for gallant and merit- orious service at the battle of Cedar Creek, Va. Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service during the war. WELLS, WILLIAM. {■>^ Lt. Light Arty., yuly 21, '14.} (1st Lt. Light Arty., Aug. 2Z,'ig.) Brevet Capt, August 28, 1829, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. WELSH, DAVID T. (irf Lt. ■^)th Inf., April 30, '13.) {Capt. yjth Inf., June 20, '14.) Retained, January, i8i6 (in reorganization under Act of March 3, 1815), as 1st Lt. Ordnance, with Brevet of Capt. from June 20, 1814. WELSH, WILLIAM. (Caft. ifyth Inf., Jan. 22, '67.) (Capt. i,oth Inf., Jan. 22, '67.) Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service in the bat- tle of Fredericksburg, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 2, 1S67, for gallant and meritorious service in the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. WESSBLLS, HENRY W. [Bvt 2dLt. 2d Inf., July I, '33.) (Lt.-Col. \%th Inf., Feb. 16, '65.) Brevet Maj., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. Brevet Lt.-Col., May 31, 1862, for gallant and merit- orious service at the battle of Fair Oaks, Va. Brevet Col., April 20, 1864, for gallant and meritorious service during the rebel attack upon Plymouth, N. C. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service during the war. WEST, ROBERT M. (Capt. -ith Cav., July 28, '66.) (Capt. ^th Cav., July 28, '66.) Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service in action at Charles City C. H., Va., December 13, 1863. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service in the battle of New Market Heights, Va. Brevet Col., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service in the battle of Five Forks, Va. WEST, WILLIAM. (liLt. 2d Inf., Oct. 24, '61.) (Cipt. 2d Inf., Feb. 16, '65.) ^ -BrevetCapt., August.!, 1864, for gallant service at the battle of Spottsvl- vama, and durmg the campaign before Richmond. WESTCOTT, GEORGE C. (id Lt. 2d Inf., Aug. I, '38.) (Capt. 2d Inf., May 7, '49. ) Brevet Capt., September 13, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct in the battle of Chapultepec. WETMORE, LEONIDAS. (2dLt. m Inf., Dec. 31, '39,) (\st Lt. et/i Inf., May 9, '46.) Brevet Capt., September 8, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct in the Pattle of El Molino del Rev. 25 562 BREVETS CONFERRED. FROM l8l2 "WHARTENBY, RICHAHD. (irf Lt. tfk Inf., May 3, '08.) (Maj. ipth Inf., May I, '14.) Retained, May, 1815 (in reorganization under act of March 3, 1815), as .Capt. 7th Inf. with Brevet of Maj. from May i, 1814. WHARTON, JOHN S. (\H Lt. xajtk Inf., May 14, '61.) [Capi. zg/i Inf., June 30, '65.) Brevet Capt., August 30^ 1862, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Bull Run (2d), Va. ■WHARTON, HENRT C. {2d Lt. Engrs., June 17, '62.) {Capt. Engrs., Nov. 11, '65.) Brevet Capt., December 5, 1864, for meritorious service in his Department in the Department of the Cumberland. WHPATON, FRANK. {istLt. xstCav , March 3, '$$.) (Col. 2d Inf., Dec., 15, '74.) Brevet Lt.-Col., May 5, 1864, for gallant and meritorious service at the bat- tle of the Wilderness, Va. Brevet Col., October 19, 1864, for gallant and meri- torious service at the battle of Cedar Creek, Va. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service at the capture of Petersburg, Va. Brevet Maj.-Gen., March 13, 1865, f™" gallant and meritorious service in the field during the war. ■WHEATON, LOTD. \Capt. y^h Inf., July 28, '66.) ( Capt. 20th Inf., July :&th, '66.) Brevet MaJ., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service in the siege of Vicksburg, Miss. Brevet Lt.-Col, March 2, 1867, for gallant and merit-' orious service in the assault on Fort Blakely, Ala. WHEEIiBR, D. D. \fid Lt. 1st Arty., May II, '66.) (ist Lt. 1st Arty., Feb. 12, '67.) Brevet Capt, March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service in the bat- tles erf Salem Heights and Cool Arbor, Va. ^ WHEBLER, JUNIXTS ^. \,zdLt. wtk Inf., Sept. g^ '47.) (Prof Mil. Acdy., Sept. 16, '71.) Brevet Maj, April 30^ 1864, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Jenkin's Ferry, Ark. Brevet Lt.-Col. and Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service during the war. "WHERRY, WIUJAM M. {1st Lt. lyh Inf., Oct. 261 '61.) (Capt. Gth Inf., April S, '66.) Brevet Capt., September i, 1864, for gallant and meritorious service during the Atlanta campaign. Brevet Maj., December i6v 1864, for gallant and merit- orious service at the battles of Franklin and Nashville. Brevet Lt.-Col. and Brevet Coi., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service during the war. ■WHIPPLE, ASHEL "W. {zd Li. 1st Arty., ^ly 1, '41.) (Maj. of Engrs^ Sept. g, %.) Brevet Lt.-Col., July 2r, 1861, for gallant and meritorioos service in the Manassas campaign. Brevet Col, December 13, 1862, for gallant and merit- orious service at the battle si Fredericksburg, Va. Brevet Brig.-Gen. May TO THE PRESENT TIME. tG^ 4, 1863, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Chancellorsvi where he was mortally wounded. Brevet Maj.-Geji., May 7, 1863, for gall, nt ami meritorious service during the war. ■WHIPPLE, WILLIAM D. {Bvt. 2dLt. zdTnf., July i, '51.) {A. A. G. (Lt.-Col.), Mar. 3, '75.) Brevet Lt.-Col., Brevet Col., Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service in the Atlanta campaign and in battles before Nash- ville. Brevet Maj.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service in the field during the war. WHISTLER, JOHN. [Ens. 1st Inf., April II, 1792.) (Capt. 1st Inf., July I, I79>.) Brevet Maj., July to, 18 1 2. No record. WHISTLER, JOSEPH N. G. [Bvt. 2dLt. Zth Inf., July i, '46.) (Lt.-Col. t,th Inf., Feb. 18, '74.) Brevet ist Lt., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. Brevet Maj., May 24, 1864, for gallant and meritorious service at North Anna, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., June 19, 1864, for gallant and meritorious service in front of Petersburg, Va. Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service during the war. WHISTLER, WILLIAM. [2(1 Lt. 1st Inf., yune 8, '01.) ' {Col. AiA Inf., ^uly li,'4i.) Brevet Maj., December 31, 1822, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. WHITALL, JOHN A. [zilLt. yh Inf., Aug. I, '38.) (Paymaster (Maf.), Aug. 8, '61.) Brevet Capt., May 9, 1846, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Palo Alto andResaca de la Palma. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious, service during the war. WHITE, ALEXANDER A. (2(1 Lt. ^th Inf., May 3, '08.) (Maj. X2th Inf., June 9, '14.) Brevet Lt.-Col., December 23, 1814, for gallant conduct at the siege of New Orleans, La. - WHITE,. CHARLES B. [Asst.Surg., May 28, '61.) [Surg. (Maj.), Oct. 1, '75.) Brevet Capt. and Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious ser- vice during the war. WHITE, QEOROE Q. (Capt. /^k Inf., July 2, '67.) (Capt. ^k Inf., July 2, '67.) Brevet Maj., July 2, 1867, for meritorious servicfe during the war. WHITE, JOHN C. (2rfZ/. iort/«/, jWajrlS, '64.) - (1st Lt.tst Arty, Sept. li,'&4.) Brevet ist Lt., June 18, 1864, for gallant and meritorious service in action in front of Petersburg, Va. Brevet Capt., August 19, 1864, for gallant and meritorious service in the battle on the Weldon Rail Road, Va. 564 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 "WHITEHEAD, rREDEHICK P. {ls( Lt. l%th Inf.i July 28, '66.) (Com. of Sub. (Caft), April 1^, '75.) Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service in the bat- tle of Champion Hill, Miss. Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the siege of Vicksburg, Miss. -WHITEHEAD, WILLIAM E. (Asst. Surg., April 13, '63.) (Asst. Surg., April 13, '63.) Brevet Capt., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious service during the war. WHITBLBY, ROBERT H. K. (Bvt, 2dLt. 2d Arty., July i, '30.) (Col. Ordn. Dept., April 6, '66,) Brevet Capt., July 19, 1836, for gallant conduct in the war against the Florida Indians. Brevet Col. and Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious service in the Ordnance Department. ■WHITING-, DANIEL P. , (Bvt, zdLt. yth Inf., July i, '32.) (Lt.-Col. (,th Inf., Feb. 15, '62.) Brevet Maj., April 18, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Cerro Gordo. ■WHITING, PABiaS. (zdLt. Arty., Feb. 10, '12.) (Capt. Arty., Sept. IQ, '19.) Brevet Maj., September 10, 1829, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. ■WHITING, HENRY. (Cor, Lt. Drags., Oct 20, 'oS.) (A. Q. M. Genl. (Col.), April zi, '46.) Brevet Capt., March 17, 1814, for meritorious services. Brevet Maj , March 17, 1824, for 10 years' faithful service. Brevet Lt.-Col., June 30, 1834, for faithful and meritorious service. Brevet Brig.-Gen., February 23, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at battle of Buena Vista. ■WHITING, HENRY M. (Svt. zdLt. ifh Arty., July i, '42.) (1st Lt., ifh Arty., Mar. 3, '47.) Brevet ist Lt., February 23, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct in the battle of Buena Vista. ■WHITING, LEONARD J. (2d Lt. 4StA Inf., July 28, '66.) (\st Lt. i,tfh Inf., June, 29, '68.) Brevet ist Lt., March 2, .1867, for gallant and meritorious service in the Peninsula campaign. Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service during the war. ■WHITING, LEVI. (2d Lt. Arty., Feb. 10, '12.) (Lt.-Col. 1st Arty., April 1, '50.) Brevet Maj., May 21, 1832, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. ■WHITMAN, ROYAL E. (2d Lt. 2d Cav., July 2, '67.) (1st Lt. ^d Cav., Aug. 12, '69.) Brevet ist Lt., July 2, 1867, for gallantry at the battle of Sabine Cross Roads, La. ■WHITS IDE, SAMUEL M. (2dLt.6thC(ai.,Nav.\,'6\.) (Capt, ^h Cav., Oct. 20,' f&) Brevet Capt. and Brevet Maj., March 13, 1861;. for faithful and meritorious TO THE PRESENT TIME. 565 WHITTELSEY, CHARLES H. [Capt. 30M . . _ My 28, '66.) ■> (Capl. ^oth Inf., July 28, '66.) Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious service in the bat- tle of Petersburg, Va., April 2, 1865. WHITTLESEY, JOSEPH H. [Biit. idLt. 2d Drags., JIuJy i, '44.) (Maj. 5//* Cav:., Nov. 12, '61.) Brevet 1st Lt., February 23, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Buena Vista. WHITTEMORE, EDWARD W^. [idLt. \^th Inf., Oct. 24, '61.) (Capt. \i,tli Inf., Mar. 10, '65.) Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services. WHITTEMORE, JAMES M. (Bvtld Lt. 2d Arty., July i, '60.) {Maj. of Ordn., June 23, '74.) Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for meritorious service in the Ordnance Department durmg the war. WIKOFF, CHARLES A. [\.st Lt. l^th Inf., May 14, '61.) (Capt. llih Inf., Aug. i^, '64.) Brevet Capt., April 7, 1862, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Shiloh, Tenn. Brevet Maj., November 25, '863, for gallant and meritorious service at the battles of Chickamauga and Missionary Ridge; WILCOX, CADMUS M. (Bvt. 2dLt. 4tA Inf., July i, '46.) (Capt. yth Inf., Dec. 20, '60.) Brevet 1st Lt., September 13, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Chapultepec. WILCOX, DE LAFAYETTE. (Ens. 2tfh Inf., Nov. 16, '13.) ( Capt. ^th Inf., April i, '22.) Brevet Maj., April i, 1832, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. WILCOX, E. N. (idLt iStA Inf., Feb. 19, '63.) (Capt. j8tA Inf., Jan. 22, '67.) Brevet Capt, September i, 1864, for gallant and meritorious service at the battle of Murfreesboro, Tenn., and in the Atlanta campaign and battle of Jonesboro, Ga. WILDRICK, ABRAHAM C. (BTit. 2d Lt. 3d Arty., July I, '57.) ( Capt. yi Arty., Feb. 8, '64.) . Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service during the siege of Petersburg, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious service during the war. WILEY, JAMES W. {2d Lt.\^th Inf., 4prU <),\^n.) {\st Lt. \lthInf.,Dec.—,-'i,i.) ■ Brevet.ist Lt, August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct in the battles of Contreras and Churubusco. W^ILHELM, THOMAS. {2dLt. %th Inf., May 11, '66.) (xstLt. %th Inf., Aug. 14, '66.) . Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the bat- 5 66 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 tie of the Wilderness, Va. Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and merit- orious services in the battle of Cold Harbor, Va. WILKESON, BAYARD. (2iiLt. ^h Arty., Oct. 22, '61.) (ut LI. 4iA Arty., Aug. 14, '62.) Brevet Capt., July i, 1863, for gallantry and skill at the battle of the De- serted House, Va. Brevet Maj,, July i, 1863, for gallant and meritorious ser- vices at tl e battle of Fredericksburg, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., July i, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Ga. WILKBSON, FRANK. (2d Lt. 4/A Arty., June 30, '64.) \zd Lt. i,th Arty., June 30, '64.) Brevet ist Lt. and Brevet Capt., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services. WILKIWS, CHARLES. (M. S. K. Ordn. Dep., Feb. 3, '62.) {M. S: K. Ordn. Dep., Feb. 3, '62.) Brevet Capt., June 20, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services in action in front of Vicksburg, Miss. 'WILKINS, JOHN D. (Bvt. 2d Lt. 4ti Inf., July i, '46.) [Lt.-Col. Sth Inf., Feb. 19, '73.) Brevet 1st Lt., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. Brevet Maj., July i, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at Malvern Hill, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., May 3, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at Fredericksburg and Chancellorsville, Va. 'WILKINSON, MELVILLE C. (zdLt. /^2dlnf., July 28, '66.) (1st Lt. zdlnf, Jan. i, '71.) Brevet ist Lt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the battle of Antietam, Md. Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and merits orious services during the war. TVILLARD, GEORGE L. (Bvt. 2d Lt. Stk Inf., June 28, '48.) (Maj. l(^h Inf., Feb. 19, '62.) Brevet Lt.-Col., July 4, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services during the Peninsular campaign in Virginia. Brevet Col., July 2, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Va. W^ILLARD, JOHN P. (2d Lt. ijth Inf., Feb. 23, '66.) (Paymaster (Maj.), Mar. 3, '75.) Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the bat- tle cf Chattanooga, Tenn. Brevet Maj., March z, 1867, for gallant and merit- orious services in the capture of Atlanta, Ga. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 2, 1867," for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Nashville, Tenn. WILLARD, A?7BLLS. (2dLt. \<)th Inf., May 11, '66.) (ist Lt. tfh Arty., Nov. 5, '68.) Brevet ist Lt., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the bat- tle of Chantilly, Va. Brevet Capt., March 2, 1867, fbr gallant and meritorious sei-vices at tlje battle of New Market, Va. ■WILLCOX, ORLANDO B. ( Col. 2i.), Mar. 3, '47.) Brevet Maj., August 20, 1847, fc'' 'gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco. WQpD, HENRY C. {2d Lt. 1st /»/., yune27,'s6.) (A. A. G. (Maj.), June n,'6i.) Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious servjces at the battle of Wilson's Creek, Mo. Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for diligent, faith- ful and meritorious services in the Adjutant-General's Department during the war. WOOD, JOSEPH H. (zd Lt. 6th Cos., Feb. 25, '63.) (ist Lt. eth Cav., Oct. 20, '64.) Brevet ist Lt., July 3, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg,. Pa. Brevet Capt., July 28, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services in the campaign against the Sioux Indians. WOOD, LAFAYETTE B. (Bvt 2jLt.Sth Inf., July 1,'^y) ^ {Capt ?,th Inf., July 1%'f,^.) Breyet ist Lt., September 23, 1846, for gallant and meiitorious conduct at Monterey. Brevet Capt., August 20, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Cdhtrei-as and Churubusco. WOOD, ROBERT C. {Asst Surg, May 28; '25.) (Surg. (Maj.), July 4, '36.) Brevet Lt.-Col., Brevet Col., and Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gal- lant and meritorious services during the war. W^OOD, THOMAS J. (Bvt. 2d Lt. Top. Eiigrs., July i, '45.) (Col. 2d Cav., Nm. 12, '61.) Brevet ist Lt., February 23, 1847, fo^ gallant and meritorious conduct at Buena Vista. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant ai.d meritorious services at Chickamauga, Ga. Brevet Maj.-Gen., March 13; 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at Nashville, Tenn. ' W^OOD, WILLIAM H. (Btit.2dT.t.ythInf.,j^tlyi,'^S-) (Col. lU/i Inf., Feb. 22, ''6g.) Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. WOODBRIDGB, FRANCIS. (2d T.,t. 2d Arty., July I, '37.) (Capt. 2d Arty., Dec. 6, '47.) Brevet Capt., August 20, 1847, foi" gallant and meritorious conduct at Con- treras and Churubusco, Brevet Maj., Septembers, 1847, for gallant and merit- orious conduct at Molino del Rey. W^OODBURY, DANIEL P. (2d Lt. 2d Arty , July i, '36.) {l.t.-Col. Engrs., June i, '63.) Brevet Col., July i, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services during the Virginia Peninsular campaign. Brevet Brig.-Gen., December 13, 1862, for gal- lant and meritorious services at the battle of Fredericksburg, Va. Brevet Maj.-Gen., August 15, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services during ths TO THE PRESENT TIME. 573 ■W-OODHOtrSB, LEVI. (21/ Lt. <^h Inf., April 9, '47.) (\st Lt. gtk Inf., Mar. — , '48.) Brevet 1st Lt., September 13, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct in the battle o£ Chapultepec. WOODHITLL, ALFRED A. (Asst-Surg. Sept. 19, '61.) (Surg. {Ma/.), Oct. I, '76.) Brevet Capt., Brevet Maj., and Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. ■WOODRUFF, CARLE A. {idLt. id Arty., Oct. 22, '61.) (Capt. zd Arty., May d, '69.) Brevet Capt., July 3, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa, Brevet Maj., June 11, 1864, for gallant and meritorious ser- vices at the battle of Trevillian Station, Va, Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for good conduct and gallant services during the virar. WOODRUFF, EDWARD C. [zdZt.jtA Inf., Mar. 2^, '62) (Capt. izth Inf., Dec. yi,''(>^) Brevet 1st Lt., July 2, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. WOODRUFF, ISRAEL C. , (Bvt.2dLt.yI Arty., July 1,' 2,6.). (Col. of Engrs., Feb. 22, '6g.) . Brevet Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services in the En- gineer Department during the war. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for meritorious services during the war. WOODS, CHARLES R. (Bvt. 2d Lt. isi Inf., July I, '52.) . , (Col. 2d Inf., Feb. l8, '74-) Brevet Lt.-Col.; July 4, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the cap- ture of Vicksburg, Miss. Brevet Col., November 24, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Chattanooga, Tenn. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services in the -battle of Atlanta, Ga. Brevet Maj.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and'meritorious services at the battle of Bentonville, N. C. ' WOODS, JAMES C. (Bvi.-2d Lt. ifh Inf., Julyi, '44-) (2d Lt. zdlnf., June 18, '46.) Brevet ist Lt., May 9, 1846, for gallant conduct in the battles of Palo Alto and Kesaca de la Palma. WOODS, SAMUEL. Maj. I sM Inf., April 9, '47, disbanded Aug. T ,' nS, and restored to commiss- ion as Capt. dth Inf., with Bvt.ofMaj. (2dLt. 6t& Inf., July i, '37.) from Sept. 13, '47.' Paymaster (Maj.), Dec. 24, '56. Brevet Lt.-Col., September 13, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Chapultepec. . Brevet Lt.-Col.; March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. 574 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 ■WOODWARD, GEORGE A. (f.t.-Col. 6,<^k Inf., July 28, '66.) (Col. \<^h Inf., Jan. 10, '76.) Brevet Col., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in the bat- tle o£ Gettysburg, Pa. ■WOODWARD, JOSEPH J. {Asst. Surg.,' Aug. 5, '61.) - [Surg., {Ma/.), June 26, 'y6.) Brevet Capt., Brevet Maj., and Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. J -WOOD^WARD, S. L. (2d Lt. lotk Cav., June 18, '67.) (1st Zf. lOtA Cav., Dec. Ti, '67.) Brevet Capt., December 11, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services during the raid through Mississippi in April, 1863. Brevet Maj., December 11, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in action at Sulphur Springs, Va. ■WOOD'WARD, SOLOMON E. {\st Lt. xtfh Inf., Aug. 5, '61.) (Caft. \yh Inf., Mar. i, '65.) Brevet Capt., December 31, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Murfreesboro, Tenn. Brevet Maj., September i, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services during the Atlanta campaign. ■WOOL, JOHN E. (Capt. \T/lk Inf., April 14, '12.) (Maj.-Gen., May 16, '62.) Brevet Lt.-Col., September 11, 1814, for gallant conduct at the battle of Plattsburg. Brevet Brig.-Gen., April 29, 1826, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. Brevet Maj.-Gen., February 23, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct in the battle of Buena Vista. WOOLE7, ABRAM R. (Dep. Commiss. Ord. (Capt.), Dec. 4, '12.) (Lt.-CoL, 6th. Inf., Dec. 16, '26.) Brevet Lt.-Col., February 9, 1825, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade ■WOOLFOLK, AUSTIN C. (A. Q. M. (Capt), Dec. 5, '63.) (A. Q. M. (Capt.), Dec. J, '63.) Brevet Maj., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war, ■WOOSTER, CHARLES F, (2dLt. /ifh Arty., -July i, '37.) (Capt. ijth Arty., Sept. 27, '50.) Brevet Capt., February 28, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Sac- ramento, near Chihuahua, Mexico, ■WORTH, ■WILLIAM J. (ist Lt. 2zdlnf., Mar. 19, '13.) (Col. Ztk Inf., July 7, '38.) Brevet Capt., July 5, 1814, for gallant and distinguished- conduct at the bat- tle of Chippewa. Brevet Maj., July 25, 1814, for gallantry and good conduct at the battle of Niagara. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March I, 1842, for gallant and highly distinguished services in the war against the Florida Indians. Brevet Maj.-Gen., September 23, 1846, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Mon- terey, Mexico. TO THE PRESENT TIME. 575 ■WORTH, -WILLIAM S. (2dLt. Zthlnf., April 26, '6t.) (Cipt. St/i Inf., Jan. 14, '66.) Brevet Capt., August i, 1864, for gallant and distinguished services at the assault on the enemy's lines before Petersburg, and in the operations in the campaign before Richmond, Va. Brevet Maj., April 9, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services during the campaign terminating with the surrender of General Lee. ■WRIGHT, BD-WARD. (Paymaster [Maj.), Feb. 23, '64.) (Paymaster {Ma;.)^ Feb. 23, '64.) Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. Brevet Col., IVIarch 13, 1865, for gallant services at James Island, S. C. ■WRIGHT, GEORGE. (idU. 2/iInf., July i, 'Z2.) (Col. gtk Inf., Mar. 3, '55.) Brevet Maj., March 15, 1842, for meritorious conduct, zeal, energy, and per- severance in the war against the Florida Indians. Brevet Lt.-Col., August 20, 1847, f""- gallant and meritorious conduct at Contreras and Churubusco. Bre- vet Col., September 8, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Molino del Rey. Brevet Brig.-Gen., December 19, 1864, for long, faithful, and meritorious services. ■WRIGHT, HORATIO G. (zdLt. Engrs. July 1, '41.) (Lt.-Col. Engrs., Nov. 23, '65.) Brevet Lt.-Col.j November 8, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Rappahannock Station, Va. Brevet Col., May 12, 1864, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Spottsylvaiiia, Va. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Cold Harbor, Va. Brevet Maj.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for gallant and merit.- orious services at the capture of Petersburg, Va. ■WRIGHT, IR^VTN B. (idLt. lUh Inf., Feb. 19, '62.) (Xst Lt. iitk Inf., Dec. 15, '62.) Brevet Capt., July 2, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Gettysburg, Pa. ■WRIGHT, JOSEPH J. B. (Asst. Surg., Oct. 25, 'j3.) {Surg. (Col.), June 26, '76.) Brevet Col., November 23, 1865. No service' given in nomination or com- mission. Brevet Brig.-Gen., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. ■WRIGHT, JOSEPH P. (Asst. Surg., May 28, '61.) (•'>'«'',r- (^V-), 7"b 28, '66.) Brevet Capt., Brevet Maj., and Brevet Lt.-Col., March 13, 1865, for faithful and meritorious services during the war. WYSE, FRANCIS P. [Bvt. 2dLt. Zd Arty., July i, '37.) (Lt.-Col. i^h Arty., Nov. 4, '61.) Brevet Maj., July 12, 1847, for gallant and meritorious conduct at Calabosa River, Mexico. 5/6 BREVETS CONFERRED FROM l8l2 YATES, THBO0ORE. {Capt. \jfh Inf., Aug. i,'<>i.) (Capt. i^ith Inf., Aug. -Cn'Si.) Brevet Maj., July 4, ,1863, for gallant and meritorious services during the siege of Vicksburg, Miss. YORK, JOSEPH S. (Capt. \tfh Inf., Aug. 29, '61.) (Capt. lt,lk Inf., Aug. 29, '61.) Brevet Maj., December 31, 1862, for gallant and meritorious services at the battles of Shiloh and Murfreesboro, Tenn. YORKB, LOiriS E. {Capt. 13/A Inf., Aug. 5, '61.) {Capt. 13?^ Inf., Aug. S,.'6i.) Brevet Maj., Jiily 4, 1863, fnr gallant and meritorious services during the siege of Vicksburg, Miss, YOUNG, JAMES. {Ens. 6t/tlnf.,^n. I2,''iz-) (Capt. id Inf., Dec. ■^i,''2'}.) Brevet Capt, June 30, 1824, for lo years' faithful service in one grade. YOUNG, JOHN H. (Capt. 15/* I)if.. May 14, '61.) (Capt. ijii /*/;, May 14, '61.) Brevet Maj., September 20, 1863, for gallant and meritorious services at the battle of Chickamauga, Ga. YOUNG, NATHANIEL. (Ettsii6tk Inf., Aug. ig, '13.) , (Ma/. %d Iitf., Dec. 25, '3^.) Brevet Maj., January r, 1829, for 10 years' faithful service in one grade. YOUNG, SAMUEL B. M. [2dLt. tztk Inf., May 11, '66.) (Capt.,ith Coo., July 28, '66.) Brevet Maj., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services in action at Sulphur Springs, Va. Brevet Lt.-Col., March 2, 1867, for gallant and merit- orious services in action at Amelia Springs, Ya. Brevet Col., March 2, 1867, for gallant and meritorious services at the tattle of Sailor's Creelc, Va. YOUNGS, WHITE. (Capt. \tfh Inf., July 6, '12.) (Capt. i^tA Inf., July 6, 'tz.) Brevet Maj., September 11, 18 14, for gallant conduct in the defense of Hattsburg. ZANTZINGER, RICHARD A. (2dLt. 2d Arty. Mar. 12, '12.) (Capt. of Arty. Dec. 12, '18.) Brevet Capt., August 15, 1814, for gallant conduct in the defense of Fort Erie. Brevet Maj., August 15, 1824, for lo.yeais'faitiiful service in one grade. MILITARY BOOKS PUBLISHED BY D. VAN NOSTRAND, 23 Murray Street and 27 Warren Street, NEW YORK. Any Book in this Catalo^e sent free by mail on receipt of price. Benton's Ordnance and Gunnery. Fourth Edition, Revised aud Enlarged. 8to. Cloth. $5.00. Ordnance and Gunnery. A Course of Instruction in Ordnance and Gunnery. Compiled for the use of the Cadets of the U. S. Military Academy, by Col. J. G. Benton, Major Ordnance Dep., late Instructor of Ordnance and Gunnery, Military Academy, West Point. Illus- trated. Holley's Ordnance and Armor. 8vo. Half Roan, $10.00. Half Russia, $12.00. A Treatise on Ohdnance and Armoe. With an Appendix^ refer- ring to Gun-Cotton, Hooped Guns, etc., etc. By Alexander L. lloUey, B. P. With 493 illustvations. 948 pages. Scott's Military Dictionary. '8vo. Half Roan, $6.00. Half Russia, $8.00. Full Morocco, $10.00. Military Dictionary. Comprising Technical Definitions; Informa- tion on Raising and Keeping Troops ; Law, Government, Regu- lation, and Administration relating to Laud Forces. By Col. II. L. Scott, U.S.A. 1vol. Fully illustrated. Roemer's Cavalry. 8vo. Cloth, SG.CO. Half Calf, $7.00. Cavalry : Its History, Management, and Uses in War. By J. Uoemer, LL.D., lata an officer of Cavalry in the Service of the Nether- lands. Elegantly illustrated with one hundred and twenty-seven fine V wood en^ravincs. Beautifully pristt^d oil tinted paper. 26 MILITABY BOOKS PUBLISHED BY Michaelis' Chroiiograph.. 4to. Illustrated. Cloth. $3.00, The Le Boulenge Chronogkaph. With three lithographed folding plates of illustrations. By. Brevet Capt. O. E. Miohaelis, First Lieu- tenant Ordnance Corps, U. S. Army. Benet's Chronoscope. Second Edition. Tlustrated. 4to. Cloth. $3.00. Electro-Ballistic Machines., and the Schultz Chronoscope. By Genl. S. V. Benet, Chief of Ordnance, U. S. Army. Dufour's Principles of strategy and Grand Tactics. 12mo. Cloth. $3.00. The Pkixciples or Strategy and Grand Tactics. Translated from the French of General G. II. Dufour. By William P. Craighill, U. S. Engr. , and late Assistant Professor of Engineering, Military Academy, West Point. From the last French edition. Illustrated. Jomini's Life of tlae Emperor Napoleon. 4 vols. 8vo., and Atlas, Cloth. Half Calf. MlilTARY AND POLITICAL LiPE OF THE EmPEROR NaPOLEON. By Baron Jomiiii, General-in-Chief and Aid-de-Camp to the Emperor of Russia. Translateid from the French, with Notes, by H. W. Ilalleck, LL^D., Major-General U. S, Army. AVith 60 Maps and Plans. Jomini's Campaign of Waterloo. Third Edition. 12mo. Cloth. $1.25. The Political and Military History or the Campaign oi" Wa- terloo. Translated from the Trench of General Baron de Jomini, by Genl. S. V. Bendt, Chief of Ordnance. Jomini's Grand Military Operations. - 2 vols. 8\'o,, and Atlas. Cloth, $15.00. Half Calf or Morocco, $21. Half Russia, $22,C0. Treatisk on Grand Military Operations. Illustrated by a Critical and JJilitary History of the Wars of Frederick the Great. With a Summary of the !Most Important Principles of the Ai-t of War. By Parou fb Jomini. Ilkistriited by Maps and Plans. Translatsd from tho Froiicli by Col. S. B. Ilol.ibird, A. D. C. , U. S; -Army. - - ' ' D. VAN NOSTUAND. 27 Rodenbougli's Everglade to Canon. Royal 8vo. Illustrated with Chi-omo-Lithograiohs. Extra Cloth. |T,BO. EvKRGLADE TO Cajjon, with the Secoiid Dragoons (Second U. S. Cav- ali7), an authentic account of service in Florida, Mexico, Virginia and the Indian Country, including Personal Recollections of Distinguished Officers. By Theo. F. Kodenbough, Colonel and Brevet Brigadier- Geueral, U S. Array. History of Brevets. Crown 8vo. Extra Cloth. $3.50. The History and Legal Effects op Bkevets in the Annies of Great Britain and the United States, froiti the origin in 1C92 until the present time. By Gen. James B. Fry, U. S. Ai-my. Barre Duparcq's Militarj^ Art and History. 8vo. Cloth. 15.00. Elements of Military Art and History. By Edward de la Barrd Duparcq, Chef de Bataillou of Engineers in the Aniiy of France, and Professor of the Military Art in the Imperial School of St. Cyr. Translated by Colonel Geo. W. Cullum, U. S. E, Myer's Manual of Signals^ 48 Plates. 12mo Eoan. $5,00. Manual or Signals, for the tJse of Signal Officers in the Field, and for Military and Naval Students, Military Schools, etc. A new edition, enlarged and illustrated. By Brig.-Gen. Albert J. Myer, Chief Signal Officer of the Army. Wallen's Service Mannal. 13mo. Cloth. $1.50. Service Manual for the Instruction of newly appointed Commissioned Officers, and the Hank and File of the Army, as compiled from Army Regulations, The Articles of War, and the Customs of Service. Ey Henry D. Wallen, Bvt. Brigadier-General U. S. Army. Boynton's History of West Point. Second Edition, 8vo. Fancy Cloth. 83.C0. History of West Point, and jta Military Importance during the American Revolution; and the Origin and Progress of the Unitjd ■ States Military Academy. By Bvt, Maj. Edv/ard C. Boynton, A. I.I., Adjutant of the Military Academy. AVith 30 Maps and Engraving 28 MILITABY BOOKS PUBLISHED BY Wood's West Point Scrap-Book. 8vo, Extra Cloth. 15.00 The West Point Sckap-Book. Being a Collection of Legends, Stories, Son3:s, &c. By Lieut. O. E. Wood, U. S. A. With 09 wood-out Illustrations. Beautifully printed on tinted paper. West Point Life. OWong 8vo, Cloth, S2.50. AVest Poixt Life. A Poem read before the Dialectic Society of the United States Military Academy. Illustrated with twenty-two full- page Pen and Ink Sketches. By A Cadet. To which is added the song, " Benny Havens, Oht" Gillmore's Fort Sumter. 8vo. Cloth. $10,00. Half Russia, $12.00, Gillmoke's Fort Sumtek. Official Report of Operations against the Defences of Charlestoii Harbor, 1803. Comprising the descent upon Jlorris Island, the Demolition of Fort Sumter, and the siege and reduction of Forts Wagner and Gregg. By Maj.-Gen. Q. A. Gill- more, U. S. Engineers. With 7G lithographic plates, views, maps,.e.tc. Grillmoro's Siapplementary Report on Fort Sumter. Svo. Cloth. $5.00, SuppLEMKNTARY Repout to the Engineer and Artillery Operations a3ai;it,t thj Defences of Charleston Harbor in 180.3. By Maj.-Gen. Q. A. Gi;lm re, U. S. Engineers. With Seven Lithographed Maps a,nd Views. Gillmore's Fort Pulaski. Svo. Clotli. 12.50 Siege and Rkduction op Fokt Pulaski, Georgia. By Maj.-Gen. Q. A. Gilhuoro, U. S. Engineers. Illu.strated by Maps and Views. Barnard, and Barry's Ilcxcit. 8vo. Cloth. $4.00. Report of the E.vgjnef.r and Artillery Operations of the Ar.my ov the Potomac, from its Ors^anizatioii to the Close of the Peninsular Campaign. By LIij -G'-n. J. G. Barnard, U. S. Engineers, an! Miij.-Gri. W. F. L.ury, Chief of Artillery. Illustrated by .18 Maps, Plaus, &c. D. VAN NOSTRAND. 29 Guide to West Point. 18mo. Flexible Cloth. $1,00. Guide to West Point and the U. S. Military Academy. With Maps and Engravings. Baornard's C. S. A., and the Battle of Bull ilun. 8vo, Clotli. $2.00, The "C. S. A.," and the Battle of Bull Run. By Maj.-Gen. J. G. Baruai'd, U. S. Engineers. With five Maps. Barnard's Peninsular Campaign. 8vo, Cloth. $1.00. 12mo. Paper 30c. The Peninsular Campaign and its Antecedents, as developed by the Report of Maj.-Geu. Geo. B. McClellan, and other published Documents. By Maj.-Gen. J. G. Barnard, U. S. Engineers. Barnard's Notes on Sea-Coast Defence. 8vo. Cloth. $2.00. Notes on Sea-Coast Defence : Consisting of Sea-Coast Fortifica- tion ; the Fifteen-Inch Gun ; and Caseiuate Embrasure. By Major- Gen. J. G. Barnard, U. S. Engineers. AVith an engraved Elate of the 15-inch Gun. Henry's Military Record of Civilian Appointments, TJ. S. A. 2 Vols. 8vo. Cloth.; $10.00. Military Record of Civilian Appointments in the United States Army. By Guy V. Henry, BrevetColouel U. S. A. Harrison's Pickett's Men. 121110. Cloth. $2.00. Pickett's Mkn. A Fragment of War History. By Col. Walter Har- rison. With portrait of Gen. Pickett. Tc diet en's Defence of Sebastopol. 12mo. Cloth. $2.00. Tnni.EBE.Vs (Gkneral) History of tiik Defenck of Sebastopol. By William Howard Russell, LL.D., of the London Times. so MILITAEY BOOKS PUBLISHED BY Hotolikiss and. Allan's Battle of Cliancellors- ville. 8vo. Cloth. 15.00. The Battle-fields of Virginia. Chancellorsville, embracing the Operations of the Army of Northern Virginia. From the First Battle of Fredericksburg to the Death of Lt.-Gen. T. J. Jackson. By Jed. Ilotchkiss and William Allan. Illustrated with five Maps and Por- trait of Stonewall Jackson. Andrews' Campaign of Mobile. 8vo. Cloth. $3.50. The Campaign' op Mobile, including the Co-operation of General Wilson's Cavalry in Alabama. By Brevet Maj.-Gen. C. C. Andrews. With five Maps and Views. Stevens' Three Years in the Sixth Corps. New and Ravised Edition. 8vo. Cloth. $3.00 TiiKF.K Years in the Sixth Corps. A concise narrative of events in the Army of the Potomac from 1861 to the Close of the Rebellion. April, 1865. By Geo. T. Stevens, Surgeon of the 77th Regt. New yprk Volunteers. Illustrated with 17 eugr.iviugs and six steel portraits. Lecomte's War in the United States. 12mo. Cloth. Sl.OO. The War in the United States. A Report to the Swiss Military Department. By Ferdinand Lecomte, Lieut.-Col. Swiss Confedera- tion. Translated from the French by a Staff Officer. Roberts' Hand-Book of Artillery. ICmo. Morocco Clasp. $2.00. Hand-Book of Artillery. For the service of the United States Army and Militia. Tenth edition, revised and greatly enlarged. By Joseph Roberts, Lt.-Col. 4th Artillery and Brevet. Maj.-General U. S. Army. Instructions for Field Artillery. 12mo. Clotli. $3.00. Instructions- FOR Field Artiilkry. Prepared by a Board of Artil- lery Officers. To which is added the "Evolutions of Batteries." translated from the French, by Brig.-Gen. R. Anderson, U, S. A. 122 plates. D. VAN NO STRAND. 31 Heavy Artillery Tactics. 12mo. Cloth. 12.50. Heavy Aktilleky Tactics. — 18G3. Instructions for Heavy Artillery; prepared by a Board of Officers, for tlie use of the Army of the United States. With service of a gun mounted on an iron cai-riage and 39 plates. Andersons' Evolntions of Field Artillery. 24mo: Cloth. $1.00. Evolutions of Field Batteries of Artillery. Translated from the French, and arranged for tlie Army and Militia of the United States. By Gen. Robert Anderson, U. S. A. Published by order of the War Department. 33 plates. Duane's Manual for Engineering Troops. 12ino. Half Morocco. |2.5a Manual for Engineer Troops : Consisting of — Parti. Ponton Drill; II. Practical Operations of a Siege; III. School of the Sap; IV. Mili- tary Mining ; V. Construction of Batteries. By General J. C. Duane, Corps of Engineers, U. S. Army. With IG plates and numerous wood- cut illustrations. Cnllnm's Military Bridges. Svo. Cloth. |!0.50. Systems of Military Bridges, in use by the United States Army, those adopted by the Great European Powers ; and such as are em- ployed in British India. With Directions for the Preservation, Destruction, and Re-establishment of Bridges. By Col. George W. Cullum, U. S. E. With 7 folding plates. Mendell's Militai-y Surveying. 12mo. Cloth. S2.00. A Treatise on Military Surveying. Theoretical and Practical, including a description of Surveying Instruments. By G. H. MendoU, Major of Engineers. With 70 wood-cut illustrations. Abbot's Siege Artillery Against Kicliraond. Svo. Cloth. 1|;3.C0. Siege Artillery in the Campaign Against Richmond. Ey Henry L. Abbot, Major of U. S; Engineers. Illustrated. Si MILITARY BOOKS PUBLISHED BY Haupt's Military Bridges. 8vo. Cloth. $6.50. Military Bridges ; For the Passage of Infantry, Artillery and Bag- gage Trains ; with suggestions of many new expedients a,nd construc- tions for crossing streams and chasms. Including also designs for Trestle and TrussrBridges for Military Railroads, adapted specially to the wants of the Service of the United States. By Herman Haupfc, Brig.-Gen. U. S. A., author of " General Theory of Bridge Construc- tions," &c. Illustrated by 09 lithographic engravings. Lendy's Maxims and Instructions on the Art of \Var. ISmo. Cloth. 75c. ' Maxims and Instructions on the Art of War. A Practical Military Guide, for the use of Soldiers of All Arms and of all Coun- tries. Translated from the French by Captain Lendy, Director of the , Practical Military College, late of the Fi'euch Staff, etc., etc. Benet's Military Law and Courts- Martial Sixth Edition, Revised and Eitorged. 8vo. Law Sheep. $450. Benet's Military Law. A Treatise on Military Law and the Prac- tice of Courts-Martial. By Gen. S. V. Benet, Chief of Ordnance U. S. A., late Assistant Professor of Ethics, Law, &c., Military Academy, West Point. Lippitt's Special Operations of War. Illustrated. 18mo. Cloth. $1.00. Lippitt's Field Service in War. 12ino. Cloth. $1.00. Lippitt's Tactical Use of th.e Three Arms. 12mo. Cloth. $1.0a Lippitt on Intrenchments. 41 Engravings. 12mo. Cloth. $1.25. Kelton's New^ Bayonet Exercise. Fifth Edition. Revised, 12rao. Cloth., $2.00. New Bayonet Exercise. A New Manual of the Bayonet, for the Army and Militia of the United States. By General J. C. Kelton U. S. A. With 43 l,oautifuIly e;;2:ravuJ-i>latjs. D. VAN NOSTBAND. 33 Craighill's Army OfELoers' Companion. 18mo. Full Roau, $2.00. The Army Officers' Pocket Companion. Principally designed for Staff Officers in the Field. Partly translated from the French of M. de Rouvre, Lieut.-Col. of the French Staff Corps, -with additions from Standard American, French, and English authorities. By Wm. P. Craighill, Major U. S. Corps of Engineers, late Assistant Professor of Engineering at the U. S. Military Academy, "West Point. Casey's U. S. Infantry Tactics. 3 vols. 24mo. Cloth. $2.6a U. S. Infantry Tactics. By Brig.-Gen. Silas Casey, U. S. A. 3 vols.; 24mo. Vol. I. — School of the Soldier; School of the Company; In- struction for Skirmishers. "Vol. II — School of the Battalion. Vol.' HI. ^Evolutions of a Brigade ; Evolutions of a Corps d'Armde. Lithographed plates. United States Tactics for Colored Troops. 21ino. Cloth. $1.50. U. S. Tactics for Colored Troops. U. S. Infantry Tactics for the use of the Colored Troops of the United States Infantry. Prepared under the direction of the "War Department Morris' Field Tactics for Infantry. Illustrated. 18mo. Cloth. 76c. Field Tactics for Infantry. By Brig.-Gen. Wm. H. Morris, U. S. Vols.i-^late Second U. S. Infantry. Monroe's Ligh.t Infantry and Company Drill. 32mo. Cloth. 75c. Light Infantry Company and Skirmish Drill. Bayonet Fencing; with a Supplement on the Handling and Service of Light Infantry. By J. Monroe, Col. Twenty-Second Regiment, N. G., N. Y. S. M. for- merly Captain U. S. Infantry. Berriman's S"word Play. Fourth Edition. 12mo. Cloth. $1.00. Sword-Plat. The Militiaman's Manual and Sword-Play without a Master. Rapier and Broad-Sword Exercises, copiously explained and illustrated; Small- Arm Light Infanti-y Drill of the United States Army ; Infantry Manual of Percussion Musket ; Company Drill of the United States Cavalry. By Major M. "W. Berriman. 84 MILITABY BOOKS PUBLISHED BY Morris' Infantry Tactics. 2 vols. 24nio. $2.00. 2 toIs. in 1. Cloth. $1.50. INFANTRY TACTICS. By Brig.-Gen. William H. Morris, U. S. Vols., and late U. S. Second Infantry. Le Gal's Scliool of the G-uides. 16mo. Cloth. eOc The School of the Guides. Designed for the use of the Militia of the United States. By Col. Eugene Le Gal. Dnryea's Standing Orders of the Seventh Regiment. New Edition. 16mo. Cloth. 50c. Standing Orders of the Seventh Regiment National Guards. By A. Duryea, Colonel. Heth's System of Target Practice. 18mo. Cloth. 75c. System op Target Practice ; For the use of Troops ■when armed ■with the Musket, Rifle-Musket, Rifle, or Carbine. Prepared princi- pally from the French, by Captain Henry Heth, Tenth Infantry, U. S. A. Wilcox's Rifles and Rifle Practice. Kew Edition. Illustrated, ^fo." Cloth. $2.00. Rifles and Rifle Practice. An Elementary Treatise on the Theory of Rifle Firing ; -with descriptions of the Infantry Rifles of Europe and the United States, their Balls and Cartridjigju*? By Captain C. M. Wilcox, U. S. A. Viele's Hand-Book for Active Service. 12nio. Cloth. $1.00. Hand-Book for Active Service, containing Practical Instructions in Campaign Duties^ For the use of Volunteers. By Brig.-Gen. Egbert L. Viele, U. S. A. Nolan's System for Training Cavalrj'- Horses. 24 Plates. Cloth. $2.00. Nolan's System for Training Cavalry Horses. By Kenner Gar- rard, Bvt. Bri^.-Gen. U. S. A. 2>. VAN NOSTRAND. 35 Arnold's Cavalry Service. Illustrated. 18mo. Cloth. 75c. Notes on Horses for Cavalry Service, embodying the Quality, Purchase, Care, and Diseases most frequently encountered, with lessons for bitting the Horse, and bending the neck. By Bvt. Major A. K. Arnold, Capt. Fifth Cavalry, Assistant Instructor of Cavalry Tactics, U. S. Mil. Academy. Cooke's Cavalry Practice. 100 Illustration^. 12mo. Cloth. $1.00. Cavalry Tactics; Regulations for the Instruction, Formation and Movements of the Cavalry of the Army and Volunteers of the United States. By Philip St. George Cooke, Brig.-Gen. U. S. A. This is the edition now iu use in the U. S. Army. Patten's Cavalry Drill. 93 Engravings. 12ino. Paper. 50c. Cavalry Drill. Containing Instructions on Foot ; Instructions on Horseback ; Basis of Instruction ; School of the Squadron, and Sabre £xercise. Patten's Infantry Tactics. 92 Engravings. 12mo. Paper. 50o. Ixfantry Tactics. School of the Soldier ; Manual of Arms for the Eifle Musket; In.structions for Recruits, School of the Company; Skirmishers, or Light Infantry and Rifle Company Movements ; the Bayonet Exercise ; the Small-Sword Exercise; Manual of the Sword or Sabre. Patten's Infantry Tactics. Revised Edition. 100 Engravings. 12nio. Paper. 75c. IxFASfTRY Tactics. . Contains Nomenclature of the Musket ; School of the Company ; Skirmishers, or Light Infantry and Rifle Company Movements ; School of the Battalion ; Bayonet Exercise j Small Sword . , Exercise ; Manual of tHe-Sword or Sabre. Pattten's Army Manual. Svo.- Cloth. $2.00. Army Majtoal. Containing Instructions for Oflicers in the Preparation of Rolls, Returns, and Accounts required of Regimental and Company Cdmmanders, and pertaining to the Subsistence and Quartermaster's Department, &c., &c. 36 MILITARY BOOKS PUBLISHED BT Patten's Artillery Drill.1 12mo, Paper. 50c Artillery Drill. Containing instruction in the School of the Piece, and Battery Manceuvres, compiled agreeably to the Latest B«gulations of the War Department. From Standard Military Authority. By George Patten, late U. S. Army. Andre^ws' Hints to Company Officers. 18mo. Cloth. 60c. Hints to Company Officers on their Military Duties. By General C. C. Andrews, Third Begt., Minnesota Vols. Thomas' Rifled Ordnance. Fifth Edition, Revised. Illustrated. 8vo. Cloth. $2.00. BiFLED Ordnance; A Practical Treatise on the Application of the Principle of the Eifle to Guns and Mortars of every calibre. To which is added a new theory of the initial action and force of Fired Gun- powder. By Lynall Thomas, F. R. S. L. Brinkerh.off 's Volunteer Quartermaster. 12mo. Cloth. $2.30. The Volunteer Quartermaster. By Captain K. BrinkerhofE, Post Quartermaster at Washington. Hunter's Manual for Quartermasters and Commissaries. 12mo. Cloth. 81.25. Flexible Morocco, SI. 50. Manual for Quartermasters and Commissaries. Containing Instructions in the Preparation of Vouchers, Abstracts, Returns, etc. By Captain R. F. Hunter, late of the U. S. Army. 12mo. Cloth. $1.25. G-reener's G-unnery. 8vo. Qoth. $4.00. FuUCaU. $6.00. Gunnery in 1858. A Treatise on Rifles, Cannon, and Sporting Arms. By Wm. Greener, E. C. E. Head's System of Fortifications. Illustrated. 4to. Paper. $1.00. A New System of Fortifications. By George E. Head, A. M., Capt. Twenty-Ninth Infantry, and Bvt. Major U. S. A. D. VAN NOSTBAND. 37 Experiments on Metal for Cannon. 4to. 25 Plates. Cloth. $10.00. ESPOKTS OP Experiments on the Steength and other Propkrtiks OF Metals for Cannon ; with a Description of the Machines for Testing Metals, and of the Classification of Cannon in Service. By OfScers of the Ordnance Department U. S. Army. Published by author- ity of the Secretary of War. Rodman's Experiments on Metals for Can- non and Powder. 4to. CO Plates. Cloth. »10.00. Reports of Experiments on the Properties of Metals for Cannon and the Qualities of Cannon Powder ; with an Ac- count of the Fabrication and Trial of a 15-inch Gun. By Captain T. J. Rodman, of the Ordnance Department of U. S. Army. Publish^ by authority of the Secretary of War. Norton's Report on the Munitions of "War. 80 Illnstrations. 8vo. Cloth. Extra. $3.50. Report to the Government of the United States on the SIu- nitions of War. exhibited at the Paris Universal Exhibition, 18C7. • By Charles B. Norton, U. S. V., and W. J. Valentine, Esq., U. S. Commissioners. Lieber's Instructions for Armies- 12iiH>. Paper. 25 cents. Instructions for the Government of Armies of the U. S. in the . Pield. Prepared by Francis Lieber, LL.D. Ordronaux's Manual for Military Surgeons. 12mo. Half Morocco. $1.50. Manual of Instructions for Military Surgeons, in the-Examin- ation of Recruits and Discharge of Soldiers. Prepared at the request of the United States Sanitary Commission. By John Ordronaux, M.D.. Professor of Medical Jurisprudence in Columbia Colleges, New York. Th,e Automaton Company. In Box $1.25. When sent by mail $1.94. The Automaton Company ; or, Infantry Soldiers' Practical Instructor. For all Company Movements in the Field. By G. .Douglafi Brewerton, U. S. Army. MILITABY BOOKS PUBLISHED BY The Automaton Battery. In Box $1.00. When sent by mail $1.30. The Automaton Battery; ok, Artillekist's Practical In- structor. For all Mounted Artillery Manoeuvres ill the Field. By G. Douglas Brewerton, U. S. A. The AutomatorL Regiment. In Box $1.00. When sent by mail $1.33. The Automaton Regiment ; or; Infantry Soldiers' Practical Instructor. For all Regimental Movements in the Field. By. G. Douglas Brewerton, U. S. A. ' . Grraftoil on the Camp and. March. 12mo. CJoth. 75c. A Treatise on the Camp and March. With which is connected the Construction of Field- Works and Military Bridges. By Captain Henry D. Graftou, U. S. A. G-en. MoClellan's Report of the, Army of the Potomac. 8vo. Cloth. $1.00. Paper. 50 cents. Report of , the. Army of the Potomac, of its operations while under his command. With Maps and Plans. By General Geo. B. McClellan, U. S. A. Moore's Portrait Gallery of the War. . 1 vol. 8vo: Cloth. $6.00. Half Calt $7.50. Portrait Gallery op the War, Civil, JVIilitary, and Naval. A Biographical Record. Edited by Frank Moore. Illustrated with. 60 fine portraits-ori steel. Bntler's Projectiles and Rifled Gannon. 4to. 36 Plates. Cloth. $7.59. Projectiles and Rifled Cannon. A Critical Discussion of the Principal Systemsof Rifling and Projectiles, 'vyiUi practical suggestions for their improvement, as embraced in a report to the Chief of Ord- nance, U. S. Army. By Capt. John S. Butler, Ordnance Corps, U. S. A. Sergeant's Roll Book. I Pocket-book form. $1.25. Sergeant's Roll Book, for the Company, Detail and. Squad. D. VAN NdSTRAND. 89 NAVAL BOOKS PUBLISHED BY ' D. VAN NO STRAND 23 Murray Street & 27 Warren Street, NEW YORK. Liace's Seamaiiship. Tonrth Edition. Crown 8vo. , Revised and Improved. Illustrated by 89 full-pag9 coiiper-plr.te engravings.' 8v6. Half Roan. S7.S0. 'sk.vmanship. I'oi- the use of the L'liited States Naval Academy. By Capt. S. B. Luce, U. S. N. 1 vol., crown octavo. ^- Text-Book attiie U. S. Naval Acadeiriy,' Aniiapblis ■ ■ Barnes' Submarine Warfare. \Vit;i 20. LitliograEliic Plates, aiid mtinj: Wood-cuts,; 8vo. ,.Clotih. $5.00. Submarine Warfare, Defensive and Offensive. ...Comprising a Full and complete History orthe-ilivention of the Torpedo, its em- plovment ifi War, and results of its" use. Descriptions of the various forms of Torpedoes, Submarine Batteries aud Torpedo Boats actually ' used in War. By Lieut. -Commander John S. Barnes, U. S. N. Jeffers' NanticarSnrveying. Illustrated with 9 Copperplates and 31 ■Wood-cut Illustrations. " 8vo." Cloth. $5.00. Nautical Surveying. By William N. Jeffers, Captain U. S. Navy. Coffinls-Narsrigation. ruth .Edition. 12ino. Cloth. 13.50. Navigation and Nautical Astronomy. Prepared for the use of the U. S. Naval Academy. By J,,H. C. Coffin, Prof, of Astronomy, Navi- gation and Surveying, with 5^ wood-cut illustrations. Text Book of Su-rveying. 8vo. 9 Lithograph Plates and sevewil Wood-cuts. lUustr-ited. Cloth. $2.00. ■A Text Book on Surveying, Projections and Portable Instruments for the use of the Cadet Midshipmen at the U. S. Naval Academy. , 4Q NAVAL BOOKS PUBLISHED BY Clark's Navigatien. Illustrated. 8vo. Cloth. $3.00. Thkoretical Navigation and Nautical Astronomy. By Lewis Clark, Lieut.- Commander U. S. Navy. Siiiipson's Ordnance and Naval Ounnery. Fifth Edition, Revised and Enlarged. Illustrated with 185 Engravings. 8vo. ■ Cloth. $5.00. A Treatise on Ordnance and Naval Gunnery. Compiled' and arranged as a Text-Book for the U. S. Naval Academy, by Commander Edward Simpson, U. S. N. Young Seaman's Manual. 8vo. Half Roan. $3.00. The Young Seaman's Manual. .Compiled from various authorities, and illustrated with numerous original and select designs. For the use of the U. S. Training Ships and the- Marine Schools. Har-wood's Naval Courts-Martial. 8vo. Law-sheeJ). $4.0tt Law and Practice of United States Naval Courts-Martial By A. A. Harwood, U. S. N. Adopted as a Text-Book at the U. S. Naval Academy. Parker's ScLuadiron Tactics. Illustrated hy 77 Plates. 8vo. Cloth. $5.00. Squadron Tactics Under Steam. By Foxhall A. Parker, Commo- dore U. S. Navy. Published by authority pf the Navy Department. Parker's Fleets of tlie "World. 8vo. 9 Illustrations. Cloth, extra. $5.00 The Fleets of the World. The Galley Period. By Foxhall A. Parker, Commodore U. S. Navy. Parker's Fleet Tactics. 18mo. Cloth. $2.5^. Fleet Tactics Under Steam. By Foxj^all A. Parkier, Commodore U. S. Navy. Illustrated by 140 wood-cijts. Parker's Naval How^itzer Asliore. 26 Plates. 8vo. Cloth. $4.00. The Naval Howitzer Ashore. By Foxhall A. Parker, Commo- dore U. S. Navy. With plates. Appypyed by the Navy Department. D. VAN NOSTBAND. 41 Parker's Naval Howitzer Afloat. 32 Plates. 8vo. Cloth. $4.00. The Naval Howitzer Afloat. By Foxhall A. Parker, Commo- dore U. S. Navy. With plates. Approved by the Navy Department. Brandt's Gunnery Catechism. Revised Edition. Illustrated. ISmo. Cloth. $1.S0. Gunnery Catechism. As applied to the service of the Naval Ord- nance. Adapted to the latest Official Kegulations, and approved by the Bureau of Ordnance, Navy Department, By J. D. Brandt, for- merly of the U. S. Navy. Ordnance Instructions for th.e United States Navy. niustiated. 8vo. Cloth. $5.00. Ordnance Instructions for the United States Navy. Part 1. B«lating to the Preparation of Vessels of War for Battle, and to the Duties of Officers and others when at Quarters. Part II. The Equip- ment and Manoeuvre of Boats, and Exercise of Howitzers. Part III. Ordnance and Ordnance Stores. Published by order of the Navy De- partment. Barrett's Gunnery Instructions. 12mo. Cloth. $1.25. Gunnery Instructions. By Capt. Edward Barrett, U. S. N., Instructor of Gunnery, Navy Yard, Brooklyn. Buckner's Tables of Ranges. 8vo. Cloth. $1.50. Calculated Tables op Ranges for Navy and Army Guns. By Lieut. W. P. Buckner, U. S. N. Luce's Naval Light ArtHlery. 22 Plates. 8vo. Cloth. $3.00. Naval Light Artillery. By Lieutenant W. H. Parker, U. B. N. Third Edition, revised by Lieut. S. B. Luce, Assistant Instructor of Gunnery and Tactics at the United States Naval Academy. Manual of Boat Exercise. 18mo. Flexible Cloth. 75c Manual oe the Boat Exercise at the U. S Naval Academy designed for the practical instruction of the Senior Class ,m Naval Tactics. 42 NAVAL BOOKS PUBLISHED BY Haraersly's Records of Living Officers of th.e U. S. Navy. Revised Edition. Cloth. 8vo. $5.00. The Eecokds of Living Officers of the U. S. Navy axd Ma- rine Corps. Compiled from Official Sources. By Lewis B. Hamersly, late Lieutenant IT. S. Marine Corps. Levy's Rules and. Regulations for Men-of- War. Tliird Edition, Revised and Enlarged. 18mo. Flexible Cloth. 50c. Manual of Internal Rules and Regulations for Men-of-War. By Commodore U. P. Levy, U. S. N. Pook's Shipbuilding. 8vo. Cloth. $5.00 A Method of Comparing the Lines and Draughting Vessels Propelled by Sail or Steam, including a Chapter on Laying off on the Mould-Loft Floor. By Samuel M. Pook, Naval Constructor. With Illustrations. Osbon's Hand-Book of the United States Navy. 12mo. Cloth. $1.60. Hand-Boo^ or the United States Navy. Being a compilation of all the principal events in the histoiy of every vessel of the United States Navy from April, 1861, to May, 1864. Compiled and arranged by B. S. Osbon. Totten's Naval Text-Book. Second and Revised Edition. 12nio. Cloth. $3.00. Naval Text-Book. Naval Text-Book and Dictionary, compiled for the use of Midshipmen of the U. S. Navy. By Commander B. J. Totten, U. S. N. Roe's Naval Duties. 12mo. Cloth. $1.50. Naval Duties and Discipline : With the Policy and Principles of Naval Organization. By F. A. Roe, late Commander U. S. Navy. Stuart's Naval Dry Docks. Fourth Edition. 4to. Cloth. $6.00. The Naval Dry Docks of the United States. By Gen. C. B. Stuart. Illustrated with 24 fine engravings on steel. D. VAN NOSTRAND. . . 43 Murphy and JefFer's Nautical Route. 8to. Cloth. $2.50. Nautical Routine and Stowage. With Short Rules in Navigation. By John McLeod Murphy and Win. N. JefEers, Jr., U. S. N. Barrett's Dead. Reckoning. 8vo. Flexible Cloth. |1.25. Dead Reckoning ; Or, Day's Work. By Edward Barrett, U. S. Navy. Our Naval School and Naval Officers. 12mo. Cloth. 75e. A Glance at the Condition or the French Navy prior to thp Franco-German War. Translated from the French of M. De Crise noy by Commander R. W. Meade, U. S. N. Ward's Naval Tactics. 8vo. Cloth. $3.00. Manual of Naval Tactics : Together with a Brief Critical Analysij of the Principal Modern Naval Battles. By James H. Ward, Com- mander U. S. N. With an Appendix, being an extract from Sir How ard Douglas's " Naval Warfare with Steam." THE PAPERS AND PROCEEDINGS OF THE United States Naval Institute, VOLUME 1.-1874. 8vo, Paper, .--*•- S3. 00. The Rebellion Record. EDITED BY FRANK MOORE. Complete in. 19 Volumes. With 158 Steel Engraved Portraits of Distinguished Generals and Fromiueut Men; together with numerous Maps and Plans of Battles. THE REBELLION EECOKD. Containing a full and concise Diary of Events, from the meeting of the South Carolina Convention in December, 1860, to the close of the War of the Rebellion, together ■with Official Reports of both Federal and Confederate State Officers, and Narratives of all the Battles and Skirmishes that occurred. 12 Tols., cloth, $60.00 ;. library sheep, $72.00 ; half calf, antique, $78.00 j half morocco, $78.00 ; half russia, $84.00. *^* Single volumes to complete sets furnished at the same rates. There are very few men of ordinary intelligence, and possessing an ordinary share of interest in the war which for a long period so entirely engrossed the public attention, who have not very often desired to fix the date of some important battle, some change of commanders, or tha issue of some noteworthy proclamation. There are fewer still who would not feel an interest in recurring to the vivid description of some important engagement by sea or land, in which mayhap a kin::vaa:^ or friend participated. THE REBELLION RECORD has, aa we believe, a claim to a very wide circulation on the following grounds: its accuracy, its impartiality, ita completeness, its preservation of all the materials for a future history of the struggle, its connected diary, its valuable documents, its interesting collection of incidents, its garnering up the poetry called out by the war, and its unique character, as the only work of its kind. THE REBELLION RECORD has now become so firmly established as the standard authority of the war, that individuals in all departments of the Army, Navy, and Government, are constantly referring to it, for narratives of important events, and official reports unpublished elsewhere. This work is a compendiam 'Of information, made up of special correspondence, ofllcial rei)ort9, and gleanings from the newspapers of both sections of the Uiiitei States and of Europe. Of these latter, over five hundred are used in itg prepata^ tiou.