CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY The original of tliis bool< is in tine Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924013353564 TRANSCRIPTS AND STUDIES. BY THE SAME AUTHOR. LIFE OF PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY. With Portrait and Jllustrations. Two Vols.., demy Suo, price 36«. " We cordially recommend all who are interested in the life and fame of Shelley, and in the literary history of the strange time in which he lived, to study Professor Dowden's volumes for themselves. Under his skilful guidance they will be enabled to discern, for the first time in any complete- ness, the true lineaments of one of the strangest persouahties ever clothed in human shape." — Times. '* The one biography of Shelley which is likely to take its place as the standard life of the poet." — Spectator. " We are glad, to bear testimony once more to the excellence of the writer's workmanship, and to the exceeding interest of his narrative. As a picture of the central figure and its smToundings,the Life will bear comparison with the masterpieces of English biogi*aphy." — Guardian. SHAKSPERE: His MIND AND ART, Eighth Edition, large post 8vo, cloth, 12s. "He has an unusual insight into the broader as well as the nicer meanings of Shakspere — . The book contains many valuable remarks on the drama." — Saturday Review. " This is a right good book, which our students of English literature should value and enjoy." — British Quarterly Review. •' A better book as an introduction to the study of Shakspere than Professoi' Dowden's we do not know." — Westminster Review. STUDIES IN LITERATURE, 1789-1877. Fowrth Edition, large post Svo, cloth, price 6s. CONTEMTS. The French Revolution and Literature George EUot. — TI. " Middlemarch " The Transcendental Movement and Literature The Scientific Movement and Litera^ tm'e The Prose Works of Wordsworth Walter Savage Landor Mr Tennyson and Mr Browning George Eliot and " Daniel Deronda " Lamennais > Edgar Quinet On some Fi'ench Writers of Verse, 1830-1877 The Poeti-y of Victor Hugo The Poeti-y of Democracy: Walt Whitman 'Written with extreme care. . . . We return thanks to Professor Dowden for certainly the most thoughtful book of literary comment which we have seen for a long time." — Acad^ny. SHAKSPERE'S SONNETS. THE PARCHMENT LIBRARY EDITION. Elzevir Svo, parcJiment antique or cloth, 6s.,- vellum, Is. Bd. Edited by Edward Dowden. With a Frontispiece etched by Leopold Lowenstam", after the Death Mask. " A more exquisite edition of these poems the book-lover can scarcely desire."— i\ro(es and Queries. " Mr Dowden has prefixed an interesting and well-proportioned introduc- tion."— ^afwrday Review. Also an enlarged Edition, uniform with " Shakspere: His Mind and Art.*' Large post Svo, 7s. Gd. London : Kegan Paul, Trench & Co., 1 Paternoster Square. Transcripts AND Studies EDWARD pOWDEN LL.D. Dublin: Hon. LL.D. IEdinburgh : PROFESSOR OF ENGLISH LITERATURE IN THE UNIVERSITY OF DUBlIn. LONDON. KEGAN PAUL, TRENCH & Co. i PATERNOSTER SQUARE 1888. ^. CL^^^^ CORNELL- hUNIVEHSITY \LIBRAR\^ ADVERTISEMENT. I THANK the proprietors and-iditors of the Fortnightly Bevieiv, the ContcTnpcn'ary ReiAetu, the Nineteenth Oentury, and the Oornhill Magazine for permitting me to republish several articles In this volume. In the article on " Victorian Literature " il have incorporated a few passages from reviews contributed by me to the Acadeony. I thank Dr Grosart for permitting me to publish the article "Spenser, the Poet and Teacher," which appeared in his privately printed edition of the works of Spenser. I thank Messrs Oassell & Co. for permitting me to republish the article on " Romeo and Juliet," which appeared as an introduction to that play in their edition de luxe, illustrated by Mr Frank Dicksee. E. D. Temple Eoad, Dublin, November 1887. CONTENTS. Oarltlb's Lectures on the. Periods op European Culture (a Transcrtpt) . . . . Shelley's " Philosophical^^ View of Eeform " (a Transcript) . ' . Last Words on Shelley . ^ The Text of Wordsworth's P^ems \ Victorian Literatubji The Interpretation of Literature.^ Spenser, the Poet and Teacher.^ Heroines of Spenser . . ^ Shakspere's Portraiture of Wom|;n . v KoMEO AND Juliet Christopher Marlowe -. The Idealism of Milton . Mr Browning's "Sordello" V CAHLYLE'S LECTURES ON THE PERIODS OF EUROPEAN CULTURE. (A Tjranscript.) " Detestable mixture of prophecy and playactorism " — so in his " Reminiscences" Carlyle describes his work as a lecturer. Yet we are assured by a keen, if friendly, critic, Harriet .Martineau, that " the merits of his- dis- courses were so great that he might probably have gone on year after year till this time with improving success and perhaps ease, but the struggle was too severe," i.e., the struggle with nervous excitement and ill-health. In a notice of the first lecture ever delivered (May 1, 1837*) by Carlyle before a London audience, the Times observes : " The lecturer, who seems new to the mere technicalities of public speaking, exhibited proofs before he had done of many of its higher and nobler attributes, gathering self-possession as he proceeded." In the following year a course of twelve lectures was delivered' " On the History of Literature, or the suc- cessive Periods of European Culture," from Homer to Goethe. As far as I can ascertain, except from short sketches of the two lectures of each week in the Exa- miner from May 6, 1838, onwards, it is now impossible * The 1st of May was illustrious. On the evening of that day Browning's Strafford was produced by Macready at Covent Garden 1 heatre, A 2 Transcripts and Studies. to obtain an account of this series of discourses.* The writer in the Examiner (perhaps Leigh Hunt) in notic- ing the first two lectures (on Greek literature) writes : " He again extemporises, he does not read. We doubted on hearing the Monday's lecture whether he would ever attain in this way to the fluency as well as depth for which he ranks among celebrated talkers in private ; but Friday's discourse relieved us. He 'strode away' like Ulysses himself, and had only to regret, in common with his audience, the limits to which the one hour confined him." George Ticknor was present at the ninth lecture of this course, and he noted in his diary (June 1, 1838): "He is a rather small, spare, ugly Scotchman, with a strong accent, which I should think he takes no pains to mitigate. . . . To-day he spoke — as I think he commonly does — without notes, and therefore as nearly extempore as a man can who prepares himself carefully, as was plain he had done. He was impressive, I think, though such lecturing could not well be very popular ; and, in some parts, if he were not poetical, he was picturesque." Ticknor estimates the audience at about one hundred. A manuscript of over two hundred and fifty pages is in my hands, which I take to be a transcript from a report of these lectures by some skilful writer of short- hand. It gives very fully, and I think faithfully, eleven lectures ; one, the ninth, is wanting. In the following pages, I may say, nothing, or very little, is my own. * Dr Chalmers was at this time a'so lecturing in London, and extensive reports of his lectures are given in the Times and the Horn- ing Chronicle. On the Periods of European Culture. 3 I have transcribed several of the most striking passages of the lectures, and given a view of the whole, preserv- ing continuity by abstracts of those portions which I do not transcribe. In these abstracts I have as far as pos- sible used the words of the manuscript. In a few in- stances I have found it convenient to bring together paragraphs on the same subject from different lectures. Some passages which say what Carlyle has said else- where I give for the sake of the manner, more direct than that of the printed page ; sometimes becoming even colloquial. The reader will do well to imagine these passages delivered with that Northern accent which Carlyle's refined Bostonian hearer thought " he took no pains to mitigate." At the outset Carlyle disclaims any intention to con- struct a scientific theory of the history of culture ; some plan is necessary in order to approach the subject and become familiar with it, but any proposed theory must be viewed as one of mere convenience. " There is only one theory which has been most triumphant — that of the planets. On no other subject has any theory succeeded so far yet. Even that is not perfect ; the astronomer knows one or two planets, we may say, but he does not know what they are, where they are going, or whether the solar system is not itself drawn into a larger system of the kind. In short, with every theory the man who knows something about it, knows mainly this— that there is much uncertainty in it, great darkness about it, extending down to an infinite deep ; in a word, that he does not know what it is. Let him take a stone, for example, the pebble that is under his feet ; he knows that it is a stone broken out of rocks old as the creation, but what that pebble is he knows not ; he knows nothing at all about that. This system of making a theory about every- thing is what we may call an enchanted state of mind. That man should be misled, that he should be deprived of knowing the truth that the world is a reality and not a huge confused hypothesis. 4 Transcripts and Studies. that he should be deprived of this by the very faculties given him to understand it, I can call by no other name than Enchantment." Yet when we look into the scheme of these lectures we perceive a presiding thought, which certainly had more than a provisional value for Carl vie. The history of culture is viewed as a succession of faiths, interrupted by periods of scepticism. The faith of Greece and Rome is succeeded by the Christian faith, with an inter- val of Pagan scepticism, of which Seneca may be taken as a representative. The Christian faith, earnestly held to men's hearts during a great epoch, is transforming itself into a new thing, not yet capable of definition, proper to our nineteenth century ; of this new thing the Goethe of " Wilhelm Meister " and the " West-ostlicher Divan" is the herald. But its advent was preceded by that melancholy interval of Christian scepticism, the eighteenth century, represented by Voltaire and the sentimental Goethe of " Werther," which reached its terrible consummation in the French Revolution ; and against which stood out in forlorn heroism Samuel John- son. Carlyle's general view is a broad one, which dis- regards all but fundamental differences in human beliefs. The Paganism of Greece is not severed from that of Rome ; Christianity, Catholic and Protestant, is essen- tially of one and the same epoch. " There is a sentence which I find in Goethe full of meaning in this regard. It must be noted, he says, that belief and unbelief are two opposite principles in human nature. The theme of all human history, so far as we are able to perceive it, is the contest between these two principles. All periods, he goes on to say, in which belief predominates, in which it is the main element the inspiring principle of action, are distinguished by great, soul- stirring, fertile events, and worthy of perpetual remembrance: On the Periods of European Culitire. 5 and, on the other hand, when unbelief gets the upper hand, that age is unfertile, unproductive, and intrinsically mean ; in which there is no pabulum for the spirit of man, and no one can get nourishment for himself. This passage is one of the most pregnant utterances ever delivered, and we shall do well to keep it in mind in these disquisitions." In attempting " to follow the stream of mind from the period at which the first great spirits of our Western World wrote and flourished down to these times," we start from Greece. When we ask who were the first inhabitants of Greece, we can derive no clear account from any source. " We have no good history of Greece. This is not at all remarkable. Greek trans-actions never had anything alive [for us ?] ; no result for us ; they were dead entirely. The only points which serve to guide us are a few ruined towns, a few masses of stone, and some broken statuary." Three epochs, however, in Greek history can be traced: the first, that of the siege of Troy — the first confederate act of the Hellenes in their capacity of a European people ; the second, that of the Persian invasion ; the third, the flower-time of Greece, the period of Alexander the Great, when Greece " exploded itself on Asia." " Europe was henceforth to develop herself on an independent footing, and it has been so ordered that Greece was to begin that. As to their peculiar physiognomy among nations, they were in one respect an extremely interesting people, but in another unamiable and weak entirely. It has been somewhere remarked by persons learned in the speculation on what is called the doctrine of races, ■that the Pelasgi were of Celtic descent. However this may be, it is certain that there is a remarkable similarity in character of the French to these Greeks. Their first feature was what we may call the central feature of all others, exhcmiting (?)* vehemence, not * MS. "existing." 6 Transcripts and Studies. exactly strength, for there was no permanent coherence in it as in strength, but a sort of fiery impetuosity ; a vehemence never any- where so remarkable as among the Greeks, except among the French, and there are instances of this, both in its good and bad point of view. As to the bad, there is the instance mentioned by Thucydides of the sedition in Corcyra, which really does read like a chapter out of the French Eevolution, in which the actors seem to be quite regardless of any moment but that which was at hand." The story of the massacre is briefly told, which recalls to Carlyle, as it did to Niehtihr, the events of September 1792. " But connected with all this savageness there was an extraordin- ary delicacy of taste and genius in them. They had a prompt dex- terity in seizing the true relations of objects, a beautiful and quick sense in perceiving the places in which the things lay, all round the world, which they had to work with, and this, without being entirely admirable, was in their own internal province highly use- ful. So the French, with their undeniable barrenness of genius, have yet in a remarkable manner the facility of expressing them- selves with precision and elegance, to so singular a degree that no ideas or inventions can possibly become popularised till they are presented to the world by means of the French language. . . . But in poetry, philosophy, and all things the Greek genius displays itself with as curious a felicity as the French does in frivolous exercises. Singing or music was the central principle of the Greeks, not a subordinate one. And they were right. What is not musical is rough and hard and cannot be harmonised. Harmony is the essence of Art and Science. The mind moulds to itself the clay, and makes it what it will." This spirit of harmony is seen even in the earliest Pelasgic architecture, and more admirably in Greek poetry, Greek temples, Greek statuary. A beautiful example m&j be found in the story of how Phidias achieved his masterpiece at Elis. " When he projected his Jupiter of Elis, his ideas were so con- fused and bewildered as to give him great unrest, and he wandered about, perplexed that the shape he wished would not disclose itself. On ike Periods of European Culture. 7 But one night, after struggling in pain with his thoughts as usual, and meditating on his design, in a dream he saw a group of Grecian maidens approach, with pails of water on their head, who began a ' song in praise of Jupiter. At that moment the Sun of Poetry stared upon him, and set free the image which he sought for, and it crystallised, as it were, out of his mind into marble, and became as symmetry itself. This Spirit of Harmony operated directly in him, informing all parts of his mind, thence transferring itself into statuary, seen with the eye, and filling the heart of all people." Having discussed the origin of Polytheism, Carlyle speaks of divination. "It is really, in my opinion, a blasphemy against human nature to attribute the whole of the system [of polytheism] to quackery and falsehood. Divination, for instance, was the great nucleus round which polytheism formed itself — the constituted core of the whole matter. All people, private men as well as states, used to consult the oracle of Dodona or Delphi (which eventually became the most celebrated of all) on all the concerns of life. Modern travellers have discovered in those places pipes and other secret contrivances from which they have concluded that these oracles were constituted on a principle of falsehood and delusion. Cicero, too, said that he was certain two Augurs could not meet without laughing ; and he was likely to know, for he had once been an Augur himself. But I confess that on reading Herodotus there appears to me to have been very little quackery about it. I can quite readily fancy that there was a great deal of reason in the oracle. The seat of that at Dodona was a deep, dark chasm, into which the diviner entered when he sought the Deity. If he was a man of devout frame of mind, he must surely have then been in the best state of feeling for foreseeing the future, and giving advice to others. No matter how this was carried on — by divination or otherwise — so long as the individual suffered himself to be wrapt in union with a higher being. I like to believe better of Greece than that she was completely at the mercy of fraud and falsehood in these matters." So it was that PheidippiJes, the runner, met Pan in the mountain gorge. * " When I consider the frame of * Carlyle tells the story of PheiJippides evidently from memory, and not quite accurately. 8 Transcripts and Studies. ijiind he must have been in, I have no doubt that he really heard in his own mind that voice of the God of Nature upon the wild mountain side, and that this was not done by quackery or falsehood at all." But above and around and behind the whole system of polytheism there was a truth discovered by the Greeks — "that truth which is in every man's heart, and to which no thinking man can refuse his assent. They recognised a destiny ! a great, dumb, black power, ruling during time, which knew nobody for its master, and in its decrees was as inflexible as adamant, and every^ one knew that it was there. It was sometimes called " Moira," or allotment, part, and sometimes " the Unchangeable.'' Their gods were not always mentioned with reverence. There is a strange document on this point, the Prometheus of ^schylus. ^schylus wrote three plays of Prometheus, but only one has survived. Prometheus had introduced fire into the world, and was punished for that : his design was to make our race a little less wretched than it was. Personally he seems to be a taciturn sort of man, but what he does speak seems like a thunderbolt against Jupiter. . . . Jupiter can hurl him to Tartarus ; his time is coming too ; he must come down ; it is all written in the book of ' Destiny.' This curious document really indicates the primeval qualities of man." Stories from Herodotus, " who was a clear-headed, candid man," of the Scythian nation who shot arrows in the stormy air against their god, and of another people who made war upon the south-wind, similarly illustrate that the ancient reverence for their deities was not the reverence for that which is highest or most powerful iu the universe. From the religion we pass {Lecture II.) to the liter- ature of the Greeks. " The ' Iliad ' or ' Song of Ilion ' consists of a series of what I call ballad delineations of the various occurrences which took place then, rather than a narrative of the event itself. For it begins in On the Periods of European Culture. 9 the middle of it, and, I might say, ends in the middle of it." The only argument in favour of Homer being the real author is derived from the common opinion and from the unity of the poem. " There appears to me to be a great improbability that any one would compose an epic except in writing. ... I began myself some time ago to read the ' Iliad,' which I had not looked at since I left school, and I must confess that from reading alone I became com- pletely convinced that it was not the work of one man. ... As to its unity — its value does not consist in an excellent sustaining of characters. There is not at all the sort of style in which Shake- speare draws his characters ; there is simply the cunning man, the great-headed, coarse, stupid man, the proud man ; but there is nothing so remarkable but that any -one else could have drawn the same characters for the purpose of piecing them into the ' Iliad.' We all know the old Italian comedy, their harlequin, doctor, and columbine. There are almost similar things in the characters in the ' Iliad."' In fact the " Iliad '' has such unity as the modern collection of our old Robin Hood ballads. " Contrasting the melodious Greek mind with the not very melodious English mind, the cithara with the fiddle (betwefeu which, by the way, there is strong resemblance), and having in remembrance that those of the one class were sung in alehouses, while the other were sung in kings' palaces, it really appears that Kobin Hood's ballads have received the very same arrangement as that which in other times produced ' the Tale of Troy divine.' " The poetry of Homer possesses the highest qualities because it delineates what is ancient and simple, the impressions of a primeval mind. Further, ' Homer does not seem to believe his story to be a fiction ; he has no doubt it is a truth. ... I do not mean to say that Homer could have sworn to the truth of his poems before a jury — far from it; but that he repeated what had survived in tradition and records, and expected his readers to believe them as he did. lo Transcripts and Studies. With respect to the " machinery," gods and goddesses, Homer was not decorating his poem with pretty fictions. Any remarkable man then might be regarded as super- natural ; the experience of the Greeks was narrow, and men's hearts were open to the marvellous. " Thus Pindar mentions that Neptune appeared on one occasion at the Nemean '' games. Here it is conceivable that if some aged individual of venerable mien and few words had in fact come thither, his appearance would have attracted attention ; people would have come to gaze upon him, and conjecture have been busy. It would be natural that a succeeding generation should actually report that a god appeared upon the eaith. " In addition to these excellences, " the poem of the ' Iliad' was actually intended to be sung ; it sings itself, not only the cadence, but the whole thought of the poem sings itself as it were ; there is a serious recitative in the whole matter. . . . With these two qualities, Music and Belief, he places his mind in a most beautiful brotherhood, in a sincere contact with his own characters ; there are no reticences ; he allows himself to expand with some touching loveliness, and occasionally it may be with an awkwardness that carries its own apology, upon all the matters that come in view of the subject of his work." In the " Odyssey " there is more of character, more of unity, and it represents a higher state of civilisation. Pallas, who had been a warrior, now becomes the God- dess of Wisdom. Ulysses, in the " Iliad " " an adroit, shifting, cunning man," becomes now " of a tragic significance." He is now " the much-endiiring, a most endearing of epithets." It is impossible that the " Odj'^ssey " could have been written by many different people. As to detailed beauties of Homer's poetry, we have a touching instance in Agamemnon's calling not only on * Isthmian ? See Pindar, Olymp. viii. 61. On the Periods of European Culture. 1 1 gods but rivers and stars to witness his oath ; " he does not say what they are,, but he feels that he himself is a mysterious existence, standing by the side of them, mysterious existences." Sometimes the simplicity of Homer's similes makes us'smile; "but there is great kindness and veneration in the smile." There is a beautiful formula which he uses to describe death :— " 'He thumped down falling, and his arms jingled about him.' Now, trivial as this expression may at first appear, it does convey a deep insight and feeling of that phenomenon. The fall, as it were, of a sack of clay, and the jingle of armour, the last sound he was ever to make throughout time, who a minute or two before was alive and vigorous, and now falls a heavy dead mass. . . . But we must quit Homer. There is one thing, however, which I ought to mention about Ulysses, that he is the very model of the type Greek, a perfect image of the Greek genius ; a shifty, nimble, active man, involved in difficulties, but every now and then bobbing up out of darkness and confusion, victorious and intact." Passing by the early Greek philosophers, whose most valuable contribution to knowledge was in the province of geometry, Carlyle comes to Herodotus. " His work is, properly speaking, an encyclopaedia of the various nations, and it displays in a striking manner the innate spirit of harmony that was in the Greeks. It begins with Croesus, King of Lydia ; upon some hint or other it suddenly goes ofi' into a digres- sion on the Persians, and then, apropos of something else, we have a disquisition on the Egyptians, and so on. At first we feel some- what impatient of being thus carried away at the sweet will of the author ; but we soon find it to be the result of an instinctive spirit of harmony, and we see all these various branches of the tale come pouring down at last in the invasion of Greece by the Persians. It is that spirit of order which has constituted him the prose poet of his country. ... It is mainly through him that we become acquainted with Themistocles, that model of the type Greek in prose, as Ulysses was in song. . . . " Contemporary with Themistocles, and a little prior to Hero- dotus, Greek tragedy began. jSlschylus I define to have been a 1 2 Transcripts and Studies. truly gigantic man — one of the largest characters ever known, and all whose mov'ements are clumsy and huge like those of a son of Anak. In short, his character is just that of Prometheus himself as he has described him. I know no more pleasant thing than to study ^schylus ; you fancy you hear the old dumb rocks speaking to you of all things they had been thinking of since the world began, in their wild, savage utterances." Sophocles translated the drama into a choral peal of melody. " The 'Antigone' is the finest thing of the kind ever sketched by man." Euripides writes for effect's sake, " but how touching is the effect produced ! " Socrates, as viewed by Carlyle, is " the emblem of the decline of the Greeks," when literature was becoming speculative. "I willingly admit that he was a man of deep feeling and morality ; but I can well understand the idea which Aristophanes had of him, that he was a man going to destroy all Greece with his innovation. . . . He shows a lingering kind of awe and attach- ment for the old religion of his country, and often we cannot make out whether he believed in it or not. He must have had but a painful intellectual life, a painful kind of life altogether one would think. . . . He devoted himself to the teaching of morality and virtue, and he spent his life in that kind of mission. I cannot say that there was any evil in this ; but it does seem to me to have been of a character entirely unprofitable. I have a great desire to admire Socrates, but I confess that his writings seem to be made up of a number of very wire-drawn notions about virtue ; there is no conclusion in him ; there is no word of life in Socrates. He was, however, personally a coherent and firm man. We pass now (Lecture III.) to the Komans. " We may say of this nation that as the Greeks may be com- pared to the children of antiquity from their naweti and graceful- ness, while their whole history is an aurora, the dawn of a higher culture and civilisation, so the Romans were the men of antiquity, and their history a glorious, warm, laborious day, less beautiful and graceful no doubt than the Greeks, but more essentially useful. . . . The Greek life was shattered to pieces against the harder. On the Periods of European Culture. 1 3 stronger life of the Romans. ... It was just as a beautiful crystal jar becomes dashed to pieces upon the hard rocks, so inexpressible was the force of the strong Roman energy." * The Eomans show the characters of two distinct species of people — the Pelasgi and the Etruscans. The old Etruscans, besides possessing a certain genius for art, were an agricultural people — " endowed with a sort of sullen energy, and with a spirit of in- tensely industrious thrift, a kind of vigorous thrift. Thus with respect to the ploughing of the earth they declare it to be a kind of blasphemy against nature to leave a clod unbroken. . . . Now this feeling was the fundamental characteristic of the Roman people before they were distinguished as conquerors. Thrift is a quality held in no esteem, and is generally regarded as mean ; it is certainly mean enough, and objectionable from its interfering with all manner of intercourse between man and man. But I can say that thrift well understood includes in itself the best virtues that a man can have in the world ; it teaches him self-denial, to post- pone the present to the future, to calculate his means, and regulate his actions accordingly ; thus understood, it includes all that man can do in his vocation. Even in its worst state it indicates a great people." + Joined with this thrift there was in the Romans a great seriousness and devoutness ; and they made the Pagan notion of fate much more productive of conse- quences than the Greeks did, by their conviction that Rome was fated to rule the world. And it was good for the world to be ruled sternly and strenuously by Rome ; it is the true liberty to obey. " That stubborn grinding down of the globe which their ances- tors practised, ploughing the ground fifteen times to make it pro- * Here Carlyle speaks of Niebuhr, whose book " is altogether a laborious thing, but he affords after all very little light on the early period of Roman history." + See, to the same effect, "a certain editor" in "Frederick the Great," b. iv., ch. 4. 1 4 Transcripts and Studies. duce a better crop than if it were ploughed fourteen times, the same was afterwards carried out by the Romans in all the concerns of their ordinary life, and by it they raised themselves above all other people. Method was their principle just as harmony was of the Greeks. The method of the Romans was a sort of harmony, but not that beautiful graceful thing which was the Greek har- mony. Theirs was a harmony of plans, an architectural harmony, which was displayed in the arranging of practical antecedents and consequences." The "crowning phenomenon" of their history was the struggle with Carthage. The Carthaginians were like the Jews, a stiff-necked people ; a people proverbial for injustice. " I most sincerely rejoice that they did not subdue the Romans, but that the Romans got the better of them. We have indications which show that they were a mean people compared to the Romans, who thought of nothing but commerce, would do anything for money, and were exceedingly cruel in their measures of aggrandise- ment and in all their measures. . . . How the Romans got on after that we can see by the Commentaries which Julius Caesar has left us of his own proceedings ; how he spent ten years of campaigns in Gaul, cautiously planning all his measures before he attempted to carry them into effect. It is, indeed, a most interesting book, and evinces the indomitable force of Roman energy ; the triumph of civil, methodic man over wild and barbarous man." Before Csesar the government of Rome seems to have been " a very tumultuous kind of polity, a continual struggle between the Patricians and the Plebeians. . . . Therefore I cannot join in the lamentations made by some over the downfall of the Republic, when Csesar took hold of it. It had been but a constant strug- gling scramble for prey, and it was well to end it, and to see the wisest, cleanest, and most judicious man of them place himself at the top of it. . . . And what an Empire was it ! Teaching man- kind that they should be tilling the ground, as they ought to be, instead of fighting one another. For that is the real thing which every man is called on to do — to till the ground, and not to slay his poor brother-man.'' On the Periods of European Culture. 1 5 Coming now to their language and literature — the peculiarly distinguishing character of the language is " its imperative sound and structure, finely adapted to command." Their greatest work was written on the face of the planet in which we live ; and all their great works were done spontaneously through a deep instinct. " The point is not to be able to write a book ; the point is to have the true mind for it. Everything in that case which a nation does will be equally significant of its mind. If any great inan among the Bomans, Julius Csesar or Cato for example, had never done anything but till the ground, they would have acquired equal excellence in that way. They would have ploughed as they con- quered. Everything a great man does carries the traces of a great man." Virgil's " ^neid " " ranks as an epic poem, and one, too, of the same sort in name as the ' Iliad ' of Homer. But I think it entirely a different poem, and very inferior to Homer. There is that fatal consciousness, that knowledge that he is writing an epic. The plot, the style, all is vitiated by that one fault. The characters, too, are none of them to be compared to the healthy, whole-hearted, robust men of Homer, the much-enduring Ulysses, or Achilles, or Agamemnon, .ffineas, the hero of the poem, is a lachrymose sort of man alto- gether. He is introduced in the middle of a storm, but instead of handling the tackle and doing what he can for the ship, he sits still, groaning over his misfortunes. ' Was ever mortal,' he asks, ' so unfortunate as I am ? Chased from port to port by the perse- cuting deities, who give me no respite,' and so on ; and then he tells them how he is ' the pious .(Eneas.' In short, he is just that sort of lachrymose man ! there is hardly anything of a man in the inside of him." " When he let himself alone," Virgil was a great poet, admirable in his description of natural scenery, and in his women ; an amiable man of mild deportment, called by the people of Naples " the maid." " The effect of his poetry is like that of some laborious mosaic of many 1 6 Transcripts and Studies. years in putting together. There is also the Roman method, the Roman amplitude and regularity." His friend Horace is " sometimes not at all edifying in his sentiments ;" too Epicurean ; " He displays a worldly kind of sagacity, but it is a great sagacity." After these, Roman literature quickly degenerated. "If we want an example of a diseased self -consciousness and exaggerated imagination, a mind blown up with all sorts of strange conceits, the spasmodic state of intellect, in short, of a man morally unable to speak the truth on any subject — we have it in Seneca. .... I willingly admit that he had a strong desire to be sincere, and that he endeavoured to convince himself that he was right, but even this when in connection with the rest constitutes of itself a fault of a dangerous kind." But — such is the power of genius to make itself heard at all times — the most significant and the greatest of Roman writers appeared later than Seneca. " In the middle of all that quackery and puffery coming into play turn-about in every department, when critics wrote books to teach you how to hold your arm and your leg, in the middle of all this absurd and wicked period Tacitus was born, and was enabled to be a Roman after all. He stood like a Colossus at the edge of a dark night, and he sees events of all kinds hurrying past him, and plunging he knew not where, but evidently to no good, for false- hood and cowardice never yet ended anywhere but in destruction." Yet he writes with grave calmness, he does not seem . startled, he is convinced that it will end well somehow or other, " for he has no belief but the old Roman belief, full of their old feelings of goodness and honesty." Carlyle closes his view of pagan literature with that passage in which Tacitus speaks of the origin of the sect called Christians. " It was given to Tacitus to see deeper into the matter than appears from the above account of it. But he and the great Empire On the Periods of European Culture. \ 7 were soon to pass away for ever ; and it was this despised sect — this Christus quidam, — it was in this new character that all the future world lay hid." The, transition period (Lecture IV.), styled " th^, millennium of darkness," was really a great and fertile period, during which belief was conquering unbelief ; conquering it not by force of argument but through the heart, and "by the conviction of men who spoke into convincible minds." Belief — that is the great fact of the time. The last belief left by Paganism is seen in the Stoic philosophers — belief in oneself, belief in the high, royal nature of man. But in their opinions a great truth is extremely exaggerated : — " That bold assertion for example, in the face of all reason and fact, that pain and pleasure are the same thing, that man is indiiferent to both. ... If we look into the Christian religion, that dignification of man's life and nature, we shall find indeed this also in it, — to believe in oneself. . . . But then how unspeakably more human is this belief, not held in proud scorn and contempt of other men, in cynical disdain or indignation at their paltriness, but received by exterminating pride altogether from the mind, and held in degradation and deep human sufierings." Christianity reveals the divinity of human sorrow. " In another point of view we may regard it as the revelation of Eternity : Every man may with truth say that he waited for a whole eternity to be born, and that he has a whole Eternity waiting to see what he wiU do now that he is born. It is this which gives to this little period of life, so contemptible when weighed against eternity, a significance it never had without it. It is thus an infinite arena, where infinite issues are played out. Not an action of man but will have its truth realised and will go on for ever. . . . This truth, whatever may be the opinions we hold on Christian doctrine, or whether we hold upon them a sacred silence or not, we must recognise in Christianity and its belief independent of all theories." If to the character of the new faith we add the B 1 8 Transcripts and Studies. character of the Northern people, we have the two lead- ing phenomena of the Middle Ages. With much shrewdness, the still rude societies of Europe find their way to order and quiet. Then, there was that thing which we call loyalty. In these times of our own " loyalty is much kept out of sight, and little appreciated, and many minds regard it as a sort of obsolete chimera, looking more to inde- pendence and some such thing, now regarded as a great virtue. And this is very just, and most suitable to this time of movement and progress. It must be granted at once that to exact loyalty to things so bad as to be not worth being loyal to is quite an un- supportable thing, and one that the world would spurn at once. This must be conceded ; yet the better thinkers will see that loyalty is a principle perennial in human nature, the highest that unfolds itself there in a temporal, secular point of view. In the Middle Ages it was the noblest phenomenon, the finest phasis in society anywhere. Loyalty was the foundation of the State." Another cardinal point was the Church. " Like all other matters, there were contradictions and incon- sistencies without end, but it should be regarded in its Ideal." Hildebrand represents the Mediaeval Church at its highest power. " He has been regarded by some classes of Protestants as the wickedest of men, but I do hope we have at this time outgrown all that. He per- ceived that the Church was the highest thing in the world, and he resolved that it should be at the top of the whole world, animating human things, and giving them their main guidance." Having described the humiliation of the Emperor Henry the Fourth at the Castle of Canossa, Carlyle proceeds : — " One would think from all this that Hildebrand was a proud man, but he was not a proud man at all, and seems from many circum-, stances to have been on the contrary a man of very great humility ; but here he treated himself as the representative of Christ, and far (9« the Periods of European Culture. 19 beyond all earthly authorities. In these circumstances doubtless there are many questionable things, but then there are many cheer- ing things. For we see the son of a poor Tuscan peasant, solely by the superior spiritual love that was in him, humble a great emperor, at the head of the iron force of Europe, and, to look at it in a tolerant point of view, it is really very grand ; it is the spirit of Europe set above the body of Europe ; the mind triutaphant over the brute force. . . . Some have feared that the tendency of such things is to found a theocracy, and have imagined that if this had gone on till our days a most abject superstition would have become established ; but this is entirely a vain theory. The clay that is about man is always sufficiently ready to assert its rights ; the danger is always the other way, that the spiritual part of man will become overlaid with his bodily part. This then was the Church, which with the loyalty of the time were the two hinges of society, and that society was in consequence distinguished from all societies which have preceded it, presenting an infinitely greater diversity of views, a better humanity, a largeness of capacity. This society has since undergone many changes, but I hope that that spirit may go on for countless ages, the spirit which at that period was set going." The grand apex of that life was the Crusades. " One sees Peter [the Hermit] riding along, dressed in his brown cloak, with the rope of the penitent tied round him, carrying all hearts, and burning them up with zeal, and stirring up steel-clad Europe till it shook itself at the words of Peter. What a contrast to the greatest of orators, Demosthenes, spending nights and years in the construction of those balanced sentences which are still read with admiration, descending into the smallest details, speaking with pebbles in his mouth and the waves of the sea beside him, and all his way of life in this manner occupied during many years, and then to end in simply nothing at all ; for he did nothing for his country, with all his eloquence. And then see this poor monk start here without any art ; for as Demosthenes was once asked what was the secret of a fine orator, and he replied Action, Action, Action, so, if I were asked it, I should say Belief, Belief, Belief. . . . Some have admired the Crusades because they served to bring all Europe into communication with itself, others because it pro- duced the elevation of the middle classes ; but I say that the great result which characterises and gives them all their merits, is that in 20 Transcripts and Studies. them Europe for one moment proved its belief, proved that it believed in the invisible world, which surrounds the outward and visible world, that this belief had for once entered into the con- sciousness of man." It was not an age for literature. The noble made his signature by dipping the mail-gloved hand into the ink and imprinting it on the charter. But heroic lives were lived, if heroic poems were not written ; an ideal did exist ; the heroic heart was not then desolate and alone ; the great result of the time was " a perpetual struggling forward." And a literature did come at last; beautiful childlike utterances of troubadour and trouvfere ; lasting, however, but a little while, in consequence of the rise of a kind of feeling adverse to the spirit of harmony. Petrarch, the troubadour of Italy, and the Nibelungen- lied represent the period. The spirit of the age did not speak much, but it was not lost. " It is not so ordered." When we hear rude, natural voices singing in the distance, all is true and bright, because all false notes destroy one another, and are absorbed in the air before they reach us, and only the true notes come to us. So in the Middle Ages we only get the heroic essence of the whole. Of the new-formed nations the Italian " first possesses a claim on our solicitude." (^Lecture F.)* Though Italy was not a great political power, she produced a greater number of great men distinguished in art, think- ing, and conduct than any other country — and to pro- duce great men is the highest thing any land can do. * I make few excerpts from this lecture, for a good part of its sub- stance appears in the lecture "The Hero as Poet," in "Heroes aud Hero-worship." On the Periods of European Culture. 2 1 The spokesman of Italy in literature is Dante — one who stands beside ^schylus and Shakspere, and " we really cannot add another great name to these." The idea of his " Divina Commedia," with its three kingdoms of eternity, is " the greatest idea that we have ever got at." " I think that when all records of Catholicism have passed away, when the Vatican shall be crumbled into dust, and St Peter's and Strasburg minster be no more, for thousands of years to come Catholicism will survive in this sublime relic of antiquity." Dante is great in his wrath, his scorn, his pity ; great above all in his sorrow. His gi-eatness of heart, united with his greatness of intellect, determine his character ; and his poem sings itself, has both insight and song. Dante does not seem to know that he is doing anything very remarkable, differing herein from Milton. " In all his delineations he has a most beautiful, sharp grace, the quickest and clearest intellect ; it is just that honesty with which his mind was set upon his subject that carries it out. . . . Take for example his description of the citj of Dis to which Virgil carries him ; it possesses a beautiful simplicity and honesty. The light was so dim that people could hardly see, and they winked at him, just as people wink with their eyes under the new moon, or as an old tailor winks threading his needle when his eyes are not good." The passage about Francesca is as " tender as the voice of mothers, full of the gentlest pity, though there is much stern tragedy in it. . . . The whole is beautiful, like a clear piping voice heard in the middle of a whirl- wind ; it is so sweet, and gentle, and good." The " Divine Comedy " is not a satire on Dante's enemies. " It was written in the pure spirit of justice. Thus he pitied poor Francesca, and would not have willingly placed her in that torment, 22 Transcripts and Studies. but it was the justice of God's law that doomed her there. . . . Sudden and abrupt movements are frequent in Dante. He is indeed full of what I can call military movements. . . . Those passages are very striking where he alludes to his own sad fortunes; there is in them a wild sorrow, a savage tone of truth, a breaking heart, the hatred of Florence, and with it the love of Florence. . . . His old schoolmaster tells him ' If thou follow thy star thou canst not miss a happy harbour.' That was just it. That star occasion- ally shone on him from the blue, eternal depths, and he felt he was doing something good ; he soon lost it again ; lost it again as he fell back into the trough of the sea. . . . Bitter ! bitter ! poor exile, — none but scoundrelly persons to associate with. . . . The " Inferno " has become of late times mainly the favourite of the three [parts of the poem] ; it has harmonised well with the taste of the last thirty or forty years, in which Europe has seemed to covet more a violence of emotion and a strength of convulsion than almost any other quality. . . . but I question whether the " Purga- torio " is not better, and a greater thing. . . . Men have of course ceased to believe these things, that there is the mountain rising up in the ocean there, or that there are those Malebolgic black gulphs ; but still men of any knowledge at all must believe that there exists the inexorable justice of God, and that penitence is a great thing here for man ; for life is but a series of errors made good again by repentance, and the sacredness of that doctrine is asserted in Dante in a manner more moral than anywhere else. . . . One can well understand what the Germans say of the three parts of the " Divina Commedia," viz., that the first is the architectural, plastic part, as of statuary ; the second is the pictorial or picturesque ; the third is the musical, the melting into music, song." Lecture VI. — Dante's way of thinking, in the nature of things, could not long continue. With an increased horizon of knowledge, his theory could no longer fit. " All theories approximate more or less to the great theory which remains itself always unknown. . . . Every philosophy that exists is destined to be embraced, melted down as it were into some larger philosophy." Universities, the art of printing, gunpowder, were chang- ing the aspects of human life during the two centuries On the Periods of European Culture. 23 that lie between Dante and Cervantes. Loyalty and the Catholic religion, as we saw, gave their character to the Middle Ages. Chivalry, the great product of the Spanish nation, is a practical illustration of loyalty ; and chivalry includes, with the German valour of character, another German feature, the reverence for women. The Spanish nation was fitted to carry chivalry to a higher perfection than it attained anywhere else. " The Spaniards had less breadth of genius than the Italians ; but they had, on the other hand, a lofty, sustained enthusiasm in a higher degree than the Italians, with a tinge of what we call romance, a dash of oriental exaggeration, and a tenacious vigour in prosecuting their object ; of less depth than the Germans, of less of that composed silent force ; yet a great people, calculated to be distinguished." Its early heroes, Viriathus and the Cid (whose memory is still musical among the people), lived silent ; their works spoke for them. The first great Spanish name in literature is that of Cervantes. His life — that of a man of action — is told by Carlyle in his brief, picturesque manner. " Don Quixote " is the very reverse of Dante, yet has analogies with Dante. It was begun as a satire on chivalry, a burlesque ; but as Cervantes proceeds, the spirit grows on him. " In his ' Don Quixote ' he portrays his own character, repre- senting himself, with good natural irony, mistaking the illusions of his own heart for realities. But he proceeds ever more and more harmoniously. . . . Above all, we see the good-humoured cheerfulness of the author in the middle of his unfortunate destiny; never provoked with it; no atrabiliar quality ever obtained any mastery in his mind. . . . Independently of chivalry, " Don Quixote" is valuable as a sort of sketch of the perpetual struggle in the human soul. We have the hard facts of this world's existence, and the ideal scheme struggling with these in a high 24 Transcripts and Studies. enthusiastic manner delineated there; and for this there is no more wholesome vehicle anywhere than irony. ... If he had given iis only a high-flown panegyric on the Age of Gold,* he would have found no ear for him ; it is the self-mockery in which he envelops it which reconciles us to the high bursts of enthusiasm, and will keep the matter alive in the heart as long as there are men to read it. It is the Poetry of Comedy." Cervantes possessed in an eminent degree the thing critics call huTnour. " If any one wish to know the difference between humour and wit, the laughter of the fool, which the wise man, by a similitude founded on deep earnestness, calls the crackling of thorns under a pot, let him read Cervantes on the one hand, and on the other Voltaire, the greatest laugher the world ever knew." Of Calderon, Carlyle has not read much, "in fact only one play and some choice specimens collected in German books," and in the German admiration for Calderon he suspects there is " very much of forced taste." Lope was " a man of a strange facility, but of much shallowness too, and greatly inferior to Calderon." In the history of Spanish literature there are only these two beside Cervantes. Why Spain declined cannot be explained : " we can only say just this, that its time was come." The lecture closes with a glance at " that conflict of Catholicism and Chivalry with the Eeforma- tion commonly called the Dutch War." Lecture VII. — The Eeformation places us upon German soil. The German character had a deep earnestness in it, proper to a meditative people! The strange fierceness known as the Berserkir rage is also theirs. * Carlyle had previously made particular reference to the scene with the goat-herda. On the Periods of European Culture. 25 " Eage of that sort, defying all dangers and obstacles, if kept down sufficiently, is as a central fire which will make all things to grow on the surface above it. . . . On the whole, it is the best character that can belong to any nation, producing strength of all sorts, and all the concomitants of strength — perseverance, steadi- ness, not easily excited, but when it is called up it will have its object accomplished. We find it iu all their history. Justice, that is another of its concomitants ; strength, one may say, in justice itself. The strong man is he that can be just, that sets everything in its own rightful place one above the other." Before the Reformation there had been two great appearances of the Germans iu European history — the first in the overthrow of the Empire, the second in the enfranchisement of Switzerland. The Eeformation was the inevitable result of human progress, the old theory- no longer being found to fit the facts. And " when the mind begins to be dubious about a creed, it will rush with double fury towards destruction ; for all serious men hate dubiety," In the sixteenth century there was no Pope Hilde- brand ready to sacrifice life itself to the end that he might make the Church the highest thing in the world. The Popes did indeed maintain the Church, " but they just believed nothing at all, or believed that they got so many thousand crowns a year by it. The whole was one chimera, one miserable sham." Any one inclined to see things in their proper light " would have decided that it was better to have nothing to do with it, but crouch down in an obscure corner somewhere, and read his Bible, and get what good he can for himself in that way, but have nothing to do with the Machiavellian policy of such a Church." At such a time Luther appeared, Luther " whose life 26 Transcripts and Studies. was not to sink into a downy sleep while he heard the great call of a far other life upon him."* His character presents whatever is best in German minds. " He is the image of a large, substantial, deep man, tliat stands upon truth, justice, fairness, that fears nothing, considers the right and calculates on nothing else ; and again, does not do it spas- modically, but quietly, calmly ; no need of any noise about it ; adheres to it deliberately, calmly, through good and bad report. Accordingly we find him a good-humoured, jovial, witty man, greatly beloved by every one, and though his words were half battles, as Jean Paul says, stronger than artillery, yet among his friends he was one of the kindest of men. The wild kind of force that was in him appears in the physiognomy of the portrait by Lake Cranach, his painter and friend ; the rough plebeian coun- tenance with all sorts of noble thoughts shining out through it. That was precisely Luther as he appears through his whole history." Erasmus admitted the necessity of some kind of reformation : — " But that he should risk his ease and comfort for it did not enter into his calculations at all. ... I should say, to make my friends understand the character of Erasmus, that he is more like Addisou than any other writer who is familiarly known in this country. . . . He was a man certainly of great merit, nor have I much to say against him . . . but he is not to be named by the side of Luther,— a mere writer of poems, a litUrateur." There is a third striking German character whom we must notice, Ulrich Hutten — a struggler all his days : " much too headlong a man. He so hated injustice that be did not know how to deal with it, and he became heart-broken by it at last. ... He says of himself he hated tumult of all kinds, and it was a painful and sad position for him that wished to obey orders, while a still higher order commanded him to disobey, when the standing by that order would be in fact the standing by disorder." * Much of what Carlyle says here of Luther reappears in " Heroes and Hero-worship." On the Periods of European Culture. 27 His lifting his cap, when at the point of death, because he had reverence for what was above him, to the Arch- bishop who had caused his destruction, " seems to me the noblest, politest thing that is recorded of any such a moment as that." And the worst thing one reads of Erasmus is his desertion of Hutten in his day of mis- fortune. The English nation {Lecture VIII,) first comes into decisive notice about the time of the Reformation. In the English character there is " a kind of silent rugged- ness of nature, with the wild Berserkir rage deeper down in the Saxon than in the others." English talent is practical like that of the Romans, a greatness of per- severance, adherence to a purpose, method ; practical greatness, in short. In the early history, before Alfred, "we read of battles and successions of kings, and one endeavours to remember them, but without success, except so much of this flocking and fighting as Milton gives us, viz., that they were the battles of the kites and crows." Yet the history of England was then in the making. " Whoever was uprooting a thistle or bramble, or drawing out a bog, or building himself a house, or in short leaving a single section of order where he had found disorder, that man was writing the History of England, the others were only obstructing it." The battles themselves were a means of ascertaining who among them should rule — who had most force and method among them. A wild kind of intellect as well as courage and traces of deep feeling are scattered over their history. There was an affirmativeness, a largeness of soul, in the intervals of these fights of kites and crows, as the doings of King Alfred show us. 28 Transcripts and Studies. About the time of Queen Elizabeth the confused elements amalgamated into some distinct vital unity. That period was " in many respects the summation of innumerable influences, the co-ordination of many things which till then had been in contest, the first beautiful outflush of energy, the first articulate, spoken energy." After centuries the blossom of poetry appeared for once. Shakspere is the epitome of the age of Elizabeth ; he is the spokesman of our nation ; like Homer, ^schylus, and Dante, a voice of the innermost heart of nature ; a uaiversal man.* His intellect was far greater than that of any other that has given an account of himself by writing books. " There is no tone of feeling that is not capable of yielding melodious resonance to that of Shak- spere." In him lay " the great, stern Berserkir rage burning deep down under all, and making all to grow out in the most flourishing way, doing ample justice to all feelings, not developing any one in particular." What he writes is properly nature, "the instinctive behest of his mind. This all-producing earth knows not the symmetry of the oak which springs from it. It is all beautiful, not a branch is out of its place, all is symmetry: but the Earth has itself no conception of it, and produced it solely by the virtue that was in itself." Shakspere has a beautiful sympathy of brotherhood with his subject, but he seems to have no notion at all of the great and deep things in him. Certain magniloquent passages lie seems to have imagined extraordinarily great, but in general there is perfect sincerity in any matter he under- * Many things said of Shakspere and o£ Knox in this lecture are Irepeated in "Heroes and Hero-worship." On the Periods of Eiiropean Culture. 29 takes. It was by accident that he was roused to be a poet, " for the greatest man is always a quiet man by nature. We are sure not to find greatness in a prurient, noisy man." We turn from Shakspere to a very different man — John Knox. " Luther would have been a great man in other things beside the Eeformation, a great substantial happy man, who must have excelled in whatever matter he undertook. Knox had not that faculty, but simply this of standing upon truth entirely ; it isn't that his sincerity is known to him to be sincerity, but it arises from a sense of the impossibility of any other procedure. . , . Sincerity, what is it but a divorce from earth and earthly feelings ? The sun- which shines upon the earth, and seems to touch it, doesn't touch the earth at all. So the man who is free of earth is the only one that can maintain the great truths of existence, not by an ill- natured talking for ever about truth, but it is he who does the truth. There is a great deal of humour in Knox, as bright a humour as in Chaucer, expressed in his own quaint Scotch Thus when he describes the two archbishops quarrelling, no doubt he was delighted to see the disgrace it brought on the Church, but he was chiefly excited by the really ludicrous spectacle of rochets flying about, and vestments torn, and the struggle each made to overturn the other." Milton may be considered " as a summing up, com- posed as it were of the two, Shakspere and Knox." * Shakspere having reverence for everything that bears the mark of the Deity, may well be called religious, but he is of no particular sect. Milton is altogether sec- tarian. As a poet "he was not one of those who reach into actual contact with the deep fountain of greatness ; " his "Paradise Lost" does not come out of the heart of things ; it seems rather to have been welded together. * So Taine, ia his more abstract way, says that Milton sum? up the Renaissance and the Eeformation. 30 Transcripts and Studies. " There is no life in his characters. Adam and Eve are beautiful, graceful objects, but no one has breathed the Pygmalion life into them ; they remain cold statues. Milton's sympathies were with things rather than men ; the scenery and phenomena of nature, the gardens, the trim gardens, the burning lake ; but as for the phe' nomena of mind, he was not able to see them. He has no delinea- tion of mind except Satan, of which we may say that Satan has his own character." [Lecture IX. is -wanting in the manuscript. The following points from the notice in the Examiner may serve to preserve continuity in the present sketch. The French as a nation " go together," as the Italians do not ; but it is physical and animal going together, not that of any steady, final purpose. Voltaire, full of wit and extraordinary talents, but nothing final in him. All modern scepticism is mere contradiction, discovering no new truth. Voltaire kind-hearted and " beneficent," however. French genius has produced nothing original. Montaigne, an honest sceptic. Excessive unction of Eabelais' humour. Rousseau's world-influencing egotism. Bayle, a dull writer.] Lecture X. — The French, as we have seen, sowed nothing in the seedfield of time ; Voltaire, on the con- trary, casting firebrands among the dry leaves, produced the combustion we shall notice by-and-bye. No pro- vince of knowledge was cultivated except in an unfruit- ful, desert way. Thus politics summed themselves up in the " Contrat Social " of Rousseau. The only use intellect was put to was to ask why things were there, and to account for it and argue about it. So it was all over Europe in the eighteenth century. The quack was established, and the only belief held was " that money will buy money's worth, and that pleasure is On the Periods of European Cidture. 31 -pleasant." In England this baneful spirit was not so deep as in France : partly because the Teutonic nature is slower, deeper than the French ; partly because Eng- land was a free Protestant country. Still it was an age of logic, not of faith ; an age of talk, striving to prove faith and morality by speech ; unaware that logic never proved any truths but those of mathematics, and that all great things are silent things. " In spite of early training I never do see sorites of logic banging together, put in regular order, but I conclude that it is going to end in some measure in some miserable delusion." However imperfect the literature of England was at this period, its spirit was never greater; it did great things, it built great towns, Birmingham and Liverpool, Cyclopean workshops, and ships. There was sincerity there at least, Arkwright and Watt were evidently sin- cere. Another symptom of the earnestness of the period was that thing we call Methodism. The fire in Whitfield — fire, not logic — was unequalled since Peter the Hermit. As to literature, "in Queen Anne's time, after that most disgraceful class of people — King Charles's people — had passed away, there appeared the milder kind of unbelief, complete formalism. Yet there were many beautiful indications of better things." " Addison was a mere lay preacher completely bound up in formalism, but he did get to say many a true thing in his genera- tion." Steele had infinitely more naiveU, but he sub- ordinated himself to Addison. "It is a cold vote in Addison's favour that one gives. By fal? the greatest man of that time, I think, was Jonathan Swift, Dean 3 2 Transcripts and Studies. Swift, a man entirely deprived of hia natural nourishment, but of great robustness, of genuine Saxon mind, not without a feeling of reverence, though from circumstances it did not awaken in him. ... He saw himself in a world of confusion and falsehood ; no eyes were clearer to see it than his.'' Being of acrid tempers-ment, he took up what was fittest for him, " sarcasm mainly, and he carried it quite to an epic pitch. There is something great and fearful in his irony" — which yet shows sometimes sympathy and a kind of love for the thing he satirises. By nature he was one of the truest of men, with great pity for his fellow-men. In Sterne " there was a great quantity of good struggling through the super- ficial evil. He terribly failed in the discharge of his duties, still we must admire in him that sporting kind of geniality and affec- tion, a son of our common mother, not cased up in buckram for- mulas. . , . We cannot help feeling his immense love for things around him, so that we may say of him as of Magdalen, ' Much is forgiven him because he much loved.' " As for Pope, " he was one of the finest heads ever known, full of deep sayings, and uttering them in the shape of couplets, rhymed couplets." * The two persons who exercised the most remarkahle influence upon things during the eighteenth century were iinquestionably Samuel Johnson t and David Hume, " two summits of a great set of L^xiences, two opposite poles of it. . , . There is not. such a cheering spectacle in the eighteenth century as Samuel Johnson." He contrived to be devout in it ; he had a belief and held by it, a genuine inspired man. Hume's eye, unlike * It is interesting to compare Thackeray's estimates of Swift and Sterne with Carlyle's. t The criticism on Johnson, being to the same effect as that of Car- lyle's essay, 1 pass over. On the Periods of European Culture. 33 Jolinson's, was not open to faith, yet he was of a noble perseverance, a silent strength. "The ' History of England' failed to get buyers ; he bore it all like a Stoic, like a heroic silent man as he was, and then proceeded calmer to the next thing he had to do. I have heard old people, who have remembered Hume well, speak of his great good humour under trials, the quiet strength of it ; the very converse in this of Dr Johnson, whose coarseness was equally strong with his heroisms." As an historian, Hume " always knows where to begin and end. In his History he frequently rises, though a cold man naturally, into a kind of epic height as he proceeds." His scepticism went to the very end, so that " all could see what was in it, and give up the unpro- fitable employment of spinning cobwebs in their brain." His fellow-historian, Robertson, was a shallow man, with only a power of arrangement, and a " soft, sleek style." Gibbon, a far greater historian than Robertson, was not so great as Hume. " With all his swagger and bom- bast, no man ever gave a more futile account of human things than he has done in the ' Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire.' " Lecture XI. — It is very strange to contrast Hume, the greatest of all the writers of his time, and in some respects the worthiest, with Dante ; to contrast scepti- cism with faith. " Dante saw a solemn law in the universe pointing out his destiny with an awful and beautiful certainty, and he held to it. Hume could see nothinof in the universe but confusion, and he was certain of nothing but his own existence. Yet he had instincts which were infinitely more true than the logical part of him, and so he kept himself quiet in the middle of it c 34 Transcripts and Studies. all, and did no harm to any one." But scepticism is a disease of the mind, a fatal condition to be in, or at best useful only as a means to get at knowledge ; and to spend one's time reducing realities to theories is to be in an enchanted state of mind. Morality, the very centre of the existence of man, was in the eighteenth century reduced to a theory — by Adam Smith to a theory of the sympathies and Moral Sense ; by Hume to expediency, " the most melancholy theory ever pro- pounded." Besides morality, everything else was in the same state. "A dinij huge, immeasurable steam-engine they had made of this world, and, as Jean Paul says, heaven became a gas ; God, a force ; the second world, a grave. ... In that huge universe be- come one vast steam-engine, as it were, the new generation that followed must have found it a very difficult position to be in, and perfectly insupportable for them, to be doomed to live in such a ■ place of falsehood and chimera ; and that was in fact the case with them, and it led to the second great phenomenon we have to notice — the introduction of Wertherism." * Werther was right : — " If the world were really no better than what Goethe imagined it to be, there was nothing for it but suicide ; if it had nothing to support itself upon but these poor sentimentalities, view-hunting trivialities, this world was really not fit to live in. But in the end the conviction that this theory of the world was wrong came to Goethe himself, greatly to his own profit, greatly to the world's profit," * A notice, far from accurate, of the origin of Goethe's "Werther " here follows, and the time is thus characterised by the future historian of Frederick : "It was a time of haggard condition ; no genuine hope in men's minds ; all outwards was false — the last war for example, the Seven Years' War, the most absurd of wars ever undertaken, on no public principle, a contest between France and Germany, from Frederick the Great wanting to have Silesia, and Louis the Fifteenth wanting to give Madame de Pompadour some influence in the afifairs of Europe ; and 50,000 men were shot for that purpose." On the Periods of European Culture. 35 The same phenomenon shows itself in Schiller's " Eobbers." Life to the robber seems one huge bedlam, and a brave man can do nothing with it but revolt against it. In our own literature Byron represents a similar phasis. He is full of " rage and scowl against the whole universe as a place not worthy that a genuine man should live in it. He seems to have been a com- pound of the Robbers and Werther put together." This sentimentalism is the ultimatum of scepticism. That theory of the universe cannot be true ; for if it were there would be no other way for it but Werther's, to put an end to it ; for all mankind " to return to the bosom of their Father with a sort of dumb protest against it. There was, therefore, a deep sincerity in the sentimentalism, not a right kind of sincerity perhaps, but still a struggling towards it." * All this — scepticism, sentimentalism, theorising, de- pendence on the opinion of others, wages taken and no duty done — went on and on. And then came the con- summation of scepticism. " We can well conceive the end of the last century, the crisis which then took place, the prurience of self-conceit, the talk of illumination, the darkness of confusion." The new French kind of belief was belief in the doctrine of Rousseau, " a kind of half- madman, but of tender pity too, struggling for sincerity through his whole life, till his own vanity and egotism drove him quite blind and desperate." Then appeared one of the frightfuUest phenomena ever seen among men, the French Revolution. " It was after all a new revelation of an old truth to this unfortunate people ; * A notice of " Goetz von Berlicliingen " follows. 36 Transcripts and Studies. they beheld, indeed, the truth there clad in hell-fire, but they got the truth." It began in all the golden radiance of hope ; it is impossible to doubt the perfect sincerity of the men. At first "for the upper class of people it was the joyfullest of news ; now at last they had got something to do ; . . . certainly to starve to death is hard, but not so hard as to idle to death.'' But the French theory of life was false — that men are to do their duty in order to give happiness to them- selves and one another. And where dishonest and fool- ish people are, there will always be dishonesty and folly ; we can't distil knavery into honesty. Europe rose and assembled and came round France, and tried to crush the Revolution, but could not crush it all. " It was the primeval feeling of nature they came to crush, but [the spirit of France *] rallied, and stood up and asserted itself, and made Europe know even in the miarrow of its bones that it was there." Bonaparte set his foot on the necks of the nations of Europe. Bonaparte himself was a reality at first, the great armed soldier of democracy, with a true appreciation of the Revolution, as opening the career to all talents ; but at last he became a poor egotist, and stirring up the old Berserkir rage against him, he burned himself up in a day. " On the whole, the French Revolution was only a great outburst of the truth that the world wasn't a mere chimera, but a great reality." Having seen how scepticism burned itself up, it becomes interesting to inquire {Lecture XII.), What are we to look for now 1 Are we to reckon on a new period * Word omitted in MS. On the Periods of European Culhire. 2i7 of things, of better infinitely extending hopes ? We do see good in store for us. The fable' of the phoenix rising out of its own ashes, which was interpreted by the rise of modern Europe out of the. Roman/ Empire, is interpreted again in the French Eevoliition. On the spiritual side of things we see the phoenix in the modern school of German literature.* We might inquire. What new doctrine is it that is now proposed to us ? What is the meaning of German literature ? But this question is not susceptible of any immediate answer, for German literature has no particular theory at all in the front of it. The object of the men who constructed it was not to save the world, but to work out in some manner an enfranchisement for their own souls. And — " seeing here the blessed, thrice-blessed phenomenon of men unmu- tilated in all that constitutes man, able to believe and be in all things men, seeing this, I say, there is here the thing that has all other things presupposed in it. . . . To explain, I can only think of the Eevelation, for I can eaU it no other, that these men made to me. It was to me like the rising of a light in the darkness which lay around, and threatened to swallow me up. I was then in the very midst of Wertherism, the blackness and darkness of death. There was one thing in particular struck me in Goethe. It is in his ' Wilhelm Meister.' He had been describing an asso- ciation of all sorts of people of talent, formed to receive propositions and give responses to them, all of which he described with a sort of seriousness at first, but with irony at the last. However, these people had their eyes on Wilhelm Meister, with great cunning watching over him at a distance at first, not interfering with him too soon j at last the man who was intrusted with the management of the thing took him in hand, and began to give him an account of how the association acted. Now this is the thing, which, as I said, so much struck me. He tells Wilhelm Meister that a. * Oarlyle is assured that there are few in his audience able to read German, but anticipates a better time. 38 Transcripts and Studies. number of applications for advice were daily made to the associa- tion, which were answered thus and thus ; but that many people wrote in particular for recipes of happiness ; all that, he adds, was laid on the shelf, and not answered at all. Now this thing gave me great surprise when I read it. ' "What ! ' I said, ' is it not the recipe of happiness that I have been seeking all my life, and isn't it pre- cisely because I have failed in finding it that I am now miserable and discontented ? ' Had I supposed, as some people do, that Goethe was fond of paradoxes, that this was consistent with the sincerity and modesty of the man's mind, I had certainly rejected it without further trouble ; but I couldn't think it. At length, after turning it up a great while in my own mind, I got to see that it was very true what he said — that it was the thing that all the world were in error in. No man has a right to ask for a recipe for happiness; he can do without happiness; there is something better than that. All kinds of men who have done great things — priests, prophets, sages — have had in them something higher than the love of happiness to guide them, spiritual clearness and perfection, a far better thing that than happiness. Love of happiness is but a kind of hunger at the best, a craving because I have not enough of sweet provision in this world. If I am asked what that higher thing is, I cannot at once make answer, I am afraid of causing mistake. There is no name I can give it that is not to be questioned ; I couldn't speak about it ; there is no name for it, but pity for that heart that does not feel it ; there is no good volition in that heart. This higher thing was once named the Cross of Christ — not a happy thing that, surely." * The whole of German literature is not to be reduced to a seeking of this higher thing, but such vras the com- mencement of it. The philosophers of Germa^iy are glanced at. " I studied them once attentively, but found that I got nothing out of them. One may just say of them that they are the precisely opposite to Hume. . . . This study of metaphysics, I say, had only the result, after bringing me rapidly through different phases of opinion, at last to deliver me altogether out of metaphysics. I found it altogether a frothy system, no right beginning to it, no * Compare with this passage " the Everlasting Yea" of "Sartor Eesartus." On the Periods of European Culture. 39 right ending. I began with Hume and Diderot, and as long as I was with them I ran at atheism, at blackness, at materialism of all kinds. If I read Kant I arrived at precisely opposite conclusions, that all the world was spirit, namely, that there was nothing material at all anywhere; and the result was what I have stated, that I resolved for my part on having nothing more to do with meta- physics at aU." After the Werther period Goethe "got himself organised at last, built up his mind, adjusted to what he can't cure, not suicidally grinding itself to pieces." For a time the Ideal, Art, Painting, Poetry, were in his view the highest things, goodness being included in these. God became for him " only a stubborn force, really a heathen kind of thing." As his mind gets higher it becomes more serious too, uttering tones of most beautiful devoutness. " In the ' West-ostlicher Divan,' though the garb is Persian, the whole spirit is Christianity, it is Goethe himself the old poet, who goes up and down singing little snatches of his own feelings on dififerent things. It grows extremely beautiful as it goes on, full of the finest things possible, which sound like the jingling of bells when the queen of the fairies rides abroad." * Of Schiller the principal characteristic is " a chivalry of thought, described by Goethe as the spirit of freedom struggling ever forward to be free." His " Don Carlos " " is well described as being like to a lighthouse, high, far-seen, and withal empty. It is in fact very like what the people of that day, the Girondists of the French Revolution, were always talking about, the Bonheur dupeuple and the rest. . . . There was a noble- * A defence of Goethe from the charges of over-serenity and politi- cal indifference follows. 40 Transcripts and Studies. ness in Schiller, a brotherly feeling, a kindness of sympathy for ■what is true and just. There was a kind of silence too at the last. He gave up his talk about the Bonheur du peuple, and tried to see if he could make them happier instead." The third great writer in modern Germany is Richter. " Goethe was a strong man, as strong as the mountain rocks, but as soft as the green sward upon the rocks, and like them continually bright and sun-beshone. Eiohter, on the contrary, was what he has been called, a half-made man ; he struggled with the world, but was never completely triumphant over it. But one loves Eichter. . . . There is more joyous laughter in the heart of Eiohter than in any other German writer." We have then much reason to hope about the future; great things are in store for us. " It is possible for us to attain a spiritual freedom compared with which political enfranchisement is but a name. ... I can't close this lecture better than by repeating these words of Eichter, Thou, Eternal Providence, wilt cause the day to davm. " Nothing now remains for me but to take my leave of you — a sad thing at all times that word, but doubly so in this case. When I think of what you are, and of what I am, I cannot help feeling that you have been kind to me ; I won't trust myself to say how kind ; but you have been as kind to me as ever audience was to man, and the gratitude which I owe you comes to you from the bottom of my heart. May God be with you all !" SHELLEY'S " PHILOSOPHICAL VIEW OF REFORM." (A Teansceipt.) Theough the kindness of Sir Percy and Lady Shelley, I have had the privilege of reading an unpublished prose work by Shelley, of greater length than any other prose writing of his except his boyish romances, a late product of that annus mirabilis which gave birth to the "Prometheus Unbound" and "The Cenci." It treats of a subject which often occupied Shelley's thoughts and profoundly interested his feelings. To have introduced a full account of this work into the Life of Shelley on which I have been long engaged would, I found, have interrupted the narrative with a digression of unsuitable length, yet it seems desirable that those persons — and they are many — who would make themselves acquainted with the total achievement, in all its breadth and variety, of Shelley's extraordinary thirty years, should, in common with me, possess some acquaintance with a piece of writing belonging to his period of full maturity, which may be viewed in a cer- tain sense as a prose comment on those poems that anticipate, as does the " Prometheus Unbound," a better and happier life of man than the life attained in our century of sorrow, and toil, and hope. Within the limits of an article in a Review, I can do no more than 42 Transcripts and Studies. give an outline of Shelley's treatise, with extracts which may serve to represent the whole.* It is to be hoped that on some fit occasion Sir Percy Shelley may decide to place the entire work — a posthumous gift of its. author — in the hands of English readers.! The manuscript occupies upwards of two hundred pages in a small vellum-bound Italian note-book. On the outer side of one of the covers is a pen-and-ink drawing by Shelley — a landscape with water and trees, filled in with more detail than is common in the delicate pieces of fantastic pencilling or pen-work found among his papers. At one end of the little volume is the fragment, " On Life," which has been assigned, on the internal evidence of style, to the year 1815, but which would hardly have had a place in this Italian note-book if it were of earlier origin than the year 1818 or 18194 The principal manuscript in the volume is evidently, in great part if not altogether, a first draft, showing many corrections, alterations, interlineations, and cancelled" sentences ; yet, except in a few passages, it is not a very difficult manuscript to read. The work remains unfinished, and the clos.ing pages yield rather a series of fragments than a continuous treatment of the subject under consideration. Nevertheless, it presents with sufficient clearness an aspect of Shelley's mind which some readers will think it worth their while to study, if * Where I condense and cannot use marks of quotation 1 yet retain, as far as may be, the words of Shelley. t " A Treatise on Political Reform," wrote Mrs Shelley in her Pre- face to Shelley's " Essays, Letters, &c. ," " and other fragments remain to be published when his works assume a complete shape. " X Of course, it may have been copied from an earlier draft into the note-book, but this is unlikely. Shelley's " Philosophical View of Reform !' 43 only for the sake of observing how the visions of his poetry were related to his views of real events and the actual condition of English society. " I have deserted the odorous gardens of literature," Shelley wrote to his friends, Mr and Mrs Gisborne, on November 6, 1819, "to journey across the great sandy desert of politics, not, as you may imagine, without the hope of finding some enchanted paradise. In all proba- bility I shall be overwhelmed by one of the tempestuous columns which are for ever traversing with the speed of a storm and the confusion of a chaos that pathless wilderness."* "I consider poetry very subordinate to moral and political science,'' he had written to Peacock in the opening of the year, "and, if I were well, certainly I would aspire to the latter, for I can conceive a great work, embodying the discoveries of all ages, and harmonising the contending creeds by which mankind have been ruled." Such a work as this Shelley did not dare to attempt ; but in the preface to " Prometheus Unbound " he speaks of a purpose, actually entertained by him, of writing, with Plato for his master and model, a " systematical history " of what he conceived to be "the genuine elements of society." This ambitious design was never carried into effect. But Shelley still desired to utter his thoughts on politics, and before the year closed he had begun an essay at once occasional and philosophical, having reference to. the present state of England, but viewing the facts of society through the * A few sentences here and elsewhere in this article have appeared in the brief account which I have given of the "Philosophical View of Reform" in my "Lite of Shelley," vol. ii., pp. 290-297. 4 4 Transcripts and Studies. medium of general principles. " One thing I want to ask you/' he wrote to Leigh Hunt (May 26, 1820), " Do you know any bookseller who would publish for me an octavo volume, entitled 'A Philosophical View of Reform'? It is boldly but temperately written, and, I think, readable. It is intended for a kind of standard book for the philosophical reformers, politically con- sidered, like Jeremy Bentham's something, but different and, perhaps, more systematic. I would send it sheet by sheet. Would you ask and think for me 1" Shelley, in 1819, had hoped to publish a series of poems intended to arouse the people of England to a sense of their actual condition, to quicken and purify their feelings, and to guide their imagination towards the true objects of national aspiration and endeavour. A few of these songs were written ; they are not without their worth and beauty, but they show that Shelley's genius was not well fitted to strike, and strike again, the chords whose vibrations thrill and animate a multitude. The same desire to serve the Liberal or Radical cause in England which moved him to utter himself in verse that aimed at being popular, moved him also to set forth his political views in a prose essay. While hold- ing opinions antagonistic in many respects to the existing social order, Shelley now, as always, was opposed to mob violence and the brutality of physical force ; he feared the influence of the demagogue on the passions of the people. It was Shelley's object to encourage men to desire and expect a vast transformation of society, but a transforma- tion which should be gradual, and unstained by cruelty or crime. Shelley's ''Philosophical View of Reform." 45 The year 1 8 ] 9 — that in which Shelley, in Rome, Leghorn, and Florence, achieved his highest work in poetry — was in England a year of commercial distress and political agitation. The reformers, it is said, now first assumed the name of Radicals. A Female Reform Society, too, now came into existence, of which one object was to instil into the minds of children " a deep- rooted hatred of our tyrannical rulers." The men of Lancashire, when they left their looms and spindles at dusk, gathered together in the fields, and went through their secret drillings "with a steadiness and a regu- larity," says Bamford, " which would not have disgraced a regiment on parade." In August was held that memorable open-air meeting in St Peter's Field, Man- chester, under the leadership of Orator Hunt, when a display of force on the part of the perplexed magistrates led, through misadventure rather than design, to the death of several persons in the excited crowd. " The country," said Lord Eldon, "must make new laws to meet this state of things, or we must have a shocking choice between military government and anarchy." New laws accordingly were made — laws which forbade public meetings without the license of magistrates, which per- mitted the search of private houses for arms, which authorised the transportation beyond the seas of one who had been twice convicted of publishing a libel. When the news of the Peterloo "massacre" reached Italy, Shelley was deeply moved, and wrote that admir- able poem, "The Mask of Anarchy," in which some- thing of prophetic vision and something of prophetic exhortation were united. "What in his own land was 46 Transcripts and Studies, named " order " appeared to Shelley to be in fact anarchy disguised and masked. The chief courtiers of King Anarchy were Eldon, and Sidmouth, and Castle- reagh. Yet Shelley does not counsel violence. He sets forth an ideal of what true freedom is for the working man of England : — " For the labourer thou art bread, And a comely table spread, From his daily labour come To a neat and happy home. Science, and Poetry, and Thought, Are thy lamps ; they make the lot Of the dwellers in a cot So serene, they curse it not." Calmness, moderation, the patience of unquenched hope and long-suffering, the patience, if need be, of martyrdom — these it is to which Shelley exhorts the English people. If force be arrayed against them, let them confront the bayonet and the sword with tranquil, unarmed breasts, and accept the laws of their country as arbiters of the dispute. " The old laws of England— they Whose reverend heads with age are grey, Children of a wiser day : And whose solemn voice must be Thine own echo — Liberty ! " "The Mask of Anarchy" was sent to England for insertion in "The Examiner," if it should appear suit- able to the editor. " I did not insert it," writes Hunt, "because I thought that the public at large had not become sufficiently discerning to do justice to the Shelley's " Philosophical View of Reform." 47 sincerity and kind-heartedness of the spirit that walked in this flaming robe of verse." "Those who imagine that their personal interest is directly or indirectly concerned in maintaining the power in which they are clothed by the existing institu- tions of English government, do not acknowledge the necessity of a material change in those institutions. With this exception, there is no inhabitant of the British [Isles]* of mature age and perfect understanding not fully persuaded of the necessity of reform." With these words Shelley's prose treatise, " A Philosophical View of Reform," opens. An introduction follows, in which a brief historical survey is attempted of the chief move- ments on behalf of freedom which have embodied the hopes and aspirations of mankind with respect to a happier social, moral, and intellectual state since the opening of the Christian era. For the student of history its value is slight; but for one who would know the habits of thought and feeling which found a lyrical utterance in the "Ode to Liberty" and the noble choral passages of " Hellas," Shelley's sketch of the history of human progress cannot be without interest. In the " Hellas," Shelley tells how — " Apollo, Pan, and Love, And even Olympian Jove," fled before "the folding star of Bethlehem." The popular notions of Christianity are represented in the poem as true " in relation to the worship they super- seded . . . without considering their merits in a rela- * Where I am uncertain as to the text I use brackets. 48 Transcripts and Studies. tion more universal." In the " Philosophical View of Eeform " historical Christianity is described as founded on an unhappy perversion of the utterances and actions of the great reformer and philanthropist of Nazareth. " The names borrowed from the life and opinions of Jesus Christ •were employed as symbols of domination and imposture ; and a system of liberty and equality, for such was the system preached by that great Reformer, was perverted to support oppression. Not hia doctrines, for they are too simple and direct to be susceptible of such perversion ; but the mere names. Such was the origin of the Catholic Church, which, together with the several dj'nasties then beginning to consolidate themselves in Europe, means, being inter- preted, a plan according to which the cunning and selfish few have employed the fears and hopes of the ignorant many to the estab- lishment of their own power and the destruction of the real in- terests of all." Shelley's studies had never led him to form any real acquaintance with the men of lofty intellect and heroic character who had appeared among the master builders of the Christian Church ; nor had he duly estimated the enfranchisement of the affections and the spiritual ardours of humanity attained through the Christian religion. The connection between liberty and the higher strivings of man's spirit in literature and art is a topic on which he dwells at the first, and one to vrhich he returns again and again : — " The Eepublics and municipal governments of Italy opposed for some time a systematic and eflfectual resistance to the all-surround- ing tyranny. The Lombard League defeated the armies of the despot in the open field, and until Florence was betrayed to those polished tyrants, the Medici, Freedom had one citadel wherSin it could find refuge from a world which was its enemy. Florence long balanced, divided, and weakened the strength of the Empire and the Popedom. To this cause, if to anything, was due the un- Shelley's "Philosophical View of Reform." 49 disputed superiority of Italy in literature and the arts over all its contemporary nations ; that union of energy and of beauty which distinguish from all other poets the ■writings of Dante, that rest- lessness of fervid power which expressed itself in painting and sculpture, and in architectural forms ,rude but daring, and from which conjointly with the creations of Athens, its predecessor and its image, Baphael and Michael Angelo drew the inspiration of what is now the astonishment of the world. The father of our own literature, Chaucer, wrought from the simple and powerful lan- guage of a nurseling of this Republic the basis of our own literature. And thus we owe, among other causes, the exact condition belong- ing to our intellectual existence to the generous disdain of submis- sion which burnt in the bosoms of men who filled a distant gene- ration and inhabited another land." The resistance offered to fraud and tyranny by the Italian Eepublics was after a time overpowered ; but already the progress of philosophy and civilisation was leading towards that great series of events known as the Reformation. Unhappily, like its child of a later ceatury, the Revolution in France, the movement was not free from violence and wrong. " Exasperated by their long sufferings, influenced by the sparks of that superstition from the flames of which they were emerg- ing, the poor rose against their natural enemies the rich, and repaid with bloody interest the tyranny of ages. One of the signs of the times was that the oppressed peasantry rose like the slaves of a West Indian planta- tion, and murdered their tyrants when they were unaware. The tyrants themselves neither then, nor now, nor ever, left or leave a path to freedom but through their own blood." The Reformation resulted in no more than a partial and imperfect emancipation of mankind from " the yoke of kings apd priests," yet the result is " perhaps the most animating that the philan- D 50 Transcripts and Studies. thropist can contemplate in the history of man. The Republic of Holland, which had been so long \worA undeciphered] the arrows of learning by which super- stition has been wounded even to death, was established by this contest. What, though the name of Republic (and by whom but by conscience-stricken tyrants could it be extinguished ?) is no more ? the Republics of Switzerland derived from this event their consolidation and their union. From England then first began to pass away the stain of conquest. The exposition of a certain portion of religious imposture drew with it an inquiry into political imposture, and was attended with an extraordinary exertion of the energies of intellectual power. Shakspere and Lord Bacon and the great writers of the age of Elizabeth were at once the effects of the new spirit in men's minds and the cause of its more complete development." The temporar}'^ abolition of aristocracy and episcopacy soon followed ; and Eng- land afforded to the world the " mighty example " of bringing to public justice " one of those chiefs of a con- spiracy of public murderers and robbers whose in- humanity has been the consecration of crime." * These words of Shelley are not without interest when we bear in mind the fact that he was engaged in the last year of his life on the drama of " Charles the First." His instincts as a dramatist held in check his political * Shelley adds in brackets an unfinished sentence : " The maxim that criminals should be pitied and reformed, not detested and punished, alone affords a source of " It may be surmised that he stood perplexed between his abstract doctrine, learnt from Godwin, and his enthusiasm on behalf of an act, to justify which Milton em- ployed argument and eloquence. Shelley s " Philosophical View of Reform" 51 partisanship, " I ought to say that the tragedy pro- mises to be good as tragedies go," he told his publisher Oilier, in a letter which [has not been printed (Jan. 11, 1821), "and that it is not coloured by the party spirit of the author." The E evolution which replaced James II. by a con- stitutional monarch is viewed by Shelley with mingled feelings of pleasure and dissatisfaction. It was "a compromise between the unextinguishable spirit of hberty and the ever-watchful spirit of fraud and tyranny." Monarchy, and aristocracy, and episcopacy were at once established and limited by law — " un- fortunately they lost no more in extent of power than they gained in security of possession." Yet as the incomplete spiritual emancipation called the Eeforma- tion established the maxim that the right to protest against religious dogmas which present themselves to his mind as false, is the inalienable prerogative of every human being, so the Revolution of 1688, though but a compromise, established the will of the people as the source from which monarchy, aristocracy, and episcopacy derive the right to subsist — " a man has no right to be a king, or a lord, or a bishop, but so long as it is for the benefit of the people, and so long as the people judge that it is for their benefit that he should imper- sonate that character. ... In both instances [the Re- formation and the English Revolution] the maxims so solemnly recorded remain as trophies of our difficult and incomplete victory planted on the enemies' land." With the decay of the old unreserved belief in those errors upon which the superstructure of political and 52 Transcripts and Studies. religious tyranny was built, began an epoch distinguished by deeper inquiries than had previously been possible into the nature of man. Bacon, Spinoza, Hobbes, Bayle, Montesquieu,* regulated the reasoning powers, criticised the history, exposed the past errors of hu- manity. "Then with a less interval of time than of genius followed Locke, and the philosophers of his exact and intelligible but super- ficial school. Their illustrations of the {word undeciphered] conse- quences of the doctrine established by the sublime genius of their predecessors were correct, popular, and energetic. Above all they indicated inferences the most incompatible with the popular re- ligions and the established governments of Europe. Philosophy went into the enchanted forest of the dsemons of "Worldly Power as the pioneer of the overgrowth of ages." t Berkeley and Hume, following these eminent thinkers, established the certainty of our ignorance v/ith respect to those obscure questions, the crude answers to which have been misnamed religious truths. A crowd of writers in France seized upon the most popular topics in the doctrine of the great philosophers, and made familiar to the multitude those particular portions of the new philosophy which conducted to inferences at war with the dreadful oppressions under which that country groaned. " Considered as philosophers their error seems to have consisted chiefly in a limitation of view ; they told the truth, but not the whole truth. This has arisen from the terrible sufferings of their countrymen, inciting them rather to apply a portion of what had already been discovered to their immediate relief, than to pursue the abstractions of thought, as the great philosophers who preceded * The name of Descartes is written and is struck out by Shelley, t This last sentence is enclosed in brackets by Shelley, as if for re- consideration. Shelley's "Philosophical View of Reform" 53 them had done for the sake of a future and more universal advan- tage." * Whilst that philosophy which, burying itself in the ob- scurer parts of our nature, regards the truth and falsehood of dogmas relating to the cause of the universe and the nature and manner of man's relation with it, was thus stripping power of its darkest mask, Political Philosophy, or that which considers the relations of man as a social being, was assuming a precise form. That Philo- sophy indeed sprang from, and maintained a connection with, that other as its parent. "What would Swift and Bolingbroke and Sidney and Locke and Montesquieu, or even Eousseau, not to speak of political philosophers, Godwin and Bentham, have been but for Lord Bacon, Montaigne, and Spinoza, and the other great lumin- aries of the preceding epoch ? Something excellent and eminent, no doubt, the last of these would have been, but something diffe- rent from and inferior to what they are." While these inquiries were proceeding the mechanical sciences attained to an extraordinary degree of advance- ment, commerce was pursued with a perpetually increas- ing -vigour, the means and sources of knowledge were increased, together with knowledge itself. This was well ; but freedom and equality, the elementary prin- ciples according to which the benefits resulting from the social union ought to be distributed, were not yet incar- nated in institutions, and hence the advantages resulting from the increase of man's power became an instrument for his additional misery. " The capabilities of happiness were increased and applied to the augmentation of misery. Modern society is thus a machine de- signed for useful purposes, whose force is by a system of subtle mechanism augmented to the highest power, but which, instead of grinding corn or raising water, acts against itself, and is perpetually wearing away the wheels of which it is composed. The result of * " The French," writes Shelley elsewhere in this MS., " were what their literature ia (excluding Montesquieu and Rousseau) weak, super- ficial, vain, with little imagination, and with passions as well as judg- ments cleaving to the external forms of things." It was, he says, their institutions which made them what they are. 54 Transcripts and Studies. the labours of the political philosophers has been the establishment of the principle of Utility as the substance, and liberty and equality as the forms, according to which the concerns of human life ought to be administered. By this test the various institutions regulat- ing political society have been tried, and, as the undigested growth of the private passions, errors, and interests of barbarians and op- pressors, have been condemned. And many new theories, more or less perfect, but all superior to the mass of evil which they would supplant, have been given to the world." The first practical illustration of the new philosophy is seen in the government of the United States. " Suf- ficiently remote, it will be confessed, from the accuracy of ideal excellence is that representative system which will soon cover the extent of that vast continent. But it is scarcely less remote from the insolent and con- taminating tyrannies under which, with some limitations of their terms as regards England, Europe groaned at the period of the successful rebellion of America." * More than anything else in the constitution of the United States Shelley admired the provision made for its modification, if needful or desirable, from time to time. " Lastly, it has an institution by which it is honourably distin- guished from all other governments which ever existed. It consti- tutionally acknowledges the progress of human improvement, and is framed under the limitation of the probability of more simple views of political science being rendered applicable to human life. There is a law by which the constitution is reserved for revision every ten years . Every other set of men who assumed the office of legislating and framing institutions for future ages, with far less right to such an assumption than the founders of the American Republic, assumed to themselves the idea that their work was the wisest and best that could possibly have been produced ; these illustrious men looked upon the past history of man, saw that it * The reader will remember the eloquent &,oge of American freedom which closes the eleventh canto of " The Revolt of Islam. Shelley's " Philosophical View of Reform" 55 was the history of his mistakes, and his sufferings arising from his mistakes ; they observed the superiority of their own work to all the works which had preceded it, and then judged it probable that other political institutions would be discovered bearing the same relation to those they had established which they bear to those which have preceded them. They provided therefore for the ap- plication of these contingent discoveries to the social state, without the violence and misery attendant upon such change in less inodest and more imperfect governments." The freedom, happiness, and strength of the people of the United States are due not merely to their situation, but to their government. Give them a king, an aristo- cracy, a priesthood bribed with a tenth part of the pro- duce of the soil, a multitude of drones enjoying the fruits of the workers, a Court of Chancery to assume to itself the most sacred rights of a citizen, a standing army to cut down the people if they murmur : " If any American should see these words his blood would run cold at the imagination of such a change. He well knows that the prosperity and happiness of the United States would, if subjected to such institutions, be no more." In one matter, however, America must look to itself; two con- ditions are necessary to a perfect government : first, " that the wUl of the people should be represented as it is ; " secondly, " that that will should be as wise and just as possible." Only the former of these is possessed by " the most perfect of practical governments, the Republic of the United States." And yet " in a certain extent the mere representation of the public will produces in itself a wholesome condition of it, and in this extent America fulfils imperfectly and indirectly the last and most important condition of perfect government." My space does not permit me to follow Shelley 5 6 Transcripts and Studies. through his survey of contemporary France (undergoing a reaction after the great revolution, yet in essentials a regenerated nation)j Germany (preparing for some stu- pendous change), Spain, South America, India,* Persia, Turkey, Asia Minor, the negro races. From the condi- tion of each he draws some augury of hope, and then returns from this wide-orbing flight to his own land. The long introduction to his essay closes with that well- known and remarkable passage which was afterwards transferred from this essay to form the closing pages of " A Defence of Poetry," where Shelley recognises in the outburst of English poetry in the present century " the herald, companion or follower of the awakening of a great people," and in all great poets " the hierophants of an unapprehended inspiration, the mirrors of the gigantic shadows which futurity casts upon the present . . . the unacknowledged legislators of the world." Across the page he has written in bold characters the words : " In this sense religion may be called poetry, though dis- torted from the beautiful simplicity of its truth. Cole- ridge has said that every poet was religious ; the converse, that every religious man must be a poet was a more true " t Here Shelley pauses to draw in outline the design of what should follow. The plan of the work was to in- clude chapters treating of: 1, the sentiment of the necessity of change ; 2, its causes and its object ; 3, * India, Shelley holds, will be benefited by the Christian mission- aries ; but it must in the end attain a freedom of its own. The Persians he describes as a refined and impassioned people. t Shelley said the same to Medwin. "Conversations with Byron," ii. 32. (Ed. 1832.) Shelley's " Philosophical View of Reform. " 57 practicability and necessity of change ; 4, state of parties as regards it ; 5, probable, possible, and desirable mode in which it should be effected. All the privileged classes are, as a matter of course, the enemies of reform. They profess a terror of anarchy, a terror certainly not disinterested, and as certainly exaggerated. "These persons propose the dilemma of submitting to a despotism which is perpetu- ally gathering like an avalanche year by year, or taking the risk of something which, it must be confessed, wears the aspect of revolution. To this alternative we are reduced by the selfishness of those who taunt us with it. And the history of the world teaches us not to hesitate an instant in the decision, if indeed the power of de- cision be not already past." Having traced briefly the history of parliamentary representation since the Long Parliament, noticing in particular the vast growth in the number of unrepre- sented citizens as compared with those who possess the franchise and the increased influence of the aristocracy on elections, Shelley passes on to speak of " the device of public credit," and spurious money transactions effected by paper. " Of this nature are all such transactions of companies and banks as consist in the circulation of promissory notes to a greater extent than the actual property possessed by those whose names they bear. They have the eflfect of augmenting the price of provisions, and of benefiting at the expense of the community the speculators in this trafiic. One of the vaunted effects of this system is to increase the national industry— that is, to increase the labours of the poor, and those luxuries which they supply the rich ; to make a manufac- turer [i.e. as we now say, an operative or artisan] work sixteen hours where he only worked eight ; to turn children into lifeless 58 Transcripts and Studies. and bloodless machines at an age when otherwise they would be at play before the cottage doors of their parents ; to augment inde- finitely the proportion of those who enjoy the profit of the labour of others as compared with those who exercise this labour." * Hence has arisen a new aristocracy, having its basis in fraud as the old aristocracy had its basis in force, t The object of all enlightened legislation and administra- tion is to enclose within the narrowest practicable limits the class of drones. The effect of the financial impos- tures of the modern rulers of England has been to increase the number of drones. In addition to the aristocracy of great landowners and merchants, who possess " a certain generosity and refinement of manners and opinions which, although neither philosophy nor virtue, has been that acknowledged substitute for them, which at least is a religion, which makes respected those venerable names," there has come into existence an aristocracy of "attorneys, excisemen, directors, govern- ment pensioners, usurers, stock-jobbers, with their de- pendants and descendants." " These are a set of pelting wretches, in whose employment there is nothing to exercise, even to their distortion, the more majestic forces of the soul. Though at the bottom it is all trick, there is something frank and magnificent in the chivalrous disdain of infamy of a gentleman. There is something to which — until you see through the base falsehood upon which all inequality is founded — it is difficult for the imagination to refuse its respect in the faithful and direct dealings of the substantial merchant. But in the habits and lives of this new aristocracy, created out of an increase in public calamities, whose existence must be terminated with their termina- * Shelley advises his readers to study Cobbett'a ' ' Paper Against Gold." + In his translation of Goethe's "May-Day Night" scene from Faust Shelley adds a note to the name of the speaker entitled " Par- vtnu " — " A sort of fandholdsr." Shelley's ''Philosophical View of Reform r 59 tion, there is nothing to qualify our disapprobation. They eat and drink and sleep, and in the intervals of these actions they cringe and lie." It is these who, by requiring mediocrity in books, poison literature ; their hopes and fears are of the narrowest description ; their domestic affections are feeble, and beyond the domestic affections they have none. Meanwhile the toil and misery of the poor increase. For fourteen hours' labour they receive the price of seven. " They eat less bread, wear worse clothes, are more ignorant, immoral, miserable, and desperate." If they believe that the same immutable God rules the next world who also rules this, what must their outlook be ! " The gleams of hope which speak of Paradise seem, like the flames of Milton's Hell, only to make darkness visible, and all things take their colour from what sur- rounds them." The choice for England is between reform, or insur- rection, or a military despotism. What, then, is the reform that we desire ? " A writer [Malthus] . . . has stated that the evils of the poor arise from an excess of population, and that after they have been stript naked by the tax-gatherer and reduced to bread and tea and fourteen hours of hard labour by their masters, after the frost has bitten their defenceless limbs, and the damp driven disease into their bones, and the suppressed revenge of hunger stamped the ferocity of want like the mark of Cain upon their countenance, the last tie by which Nature holds them to benignant earth, whose plenty is garnered up in the strongholds of their tyrants, is to be divided; that the single alleviation of their sufferings and their scorns, the one thing which made it impossible to degrade them below the beasts, which amid all their crimes and miseries yet separated a cynical and unmanly contamination, an anti-social 6o Transcripts and Shidies. cruelty from all the soothing and elevating and harmonizing gentle- ness of the sexual intercourse, and the humanizing charities of domestic life, which are its appendages — ^that this is to be obliterated." The reform according to Malthus is not the reform desired by Shelley. What, then, is that reform ? Before aspiring after theoretical perfection in the State, we must possess, he says, the advantages of which nations are at present susceptible. To abolish the national debt ; to disband the standing army ; to abolish tithes, due regard being had to vested interests ; to grant complete freedom to thought and its expression ; to render justice cheap, speedy, and secure — these measures, Shelley believed, would together constitute a reform which we might accept as sufficient for a time. Filled as he was with boundless hopes for the future, these demands for the present seemed to him reasonable and moderate. " The payment of the principal of what is called the National Debt, which it is pretended is so difficult a problem, is only difficult to those who do not see who nre the creditors, and who the debtors, and who the wretched sufferers from whom they both wring the taxes." In truth the nation is not the debtor ; the debt was contracted not by the nation towards a portion of it, but by the whole mass of the privileged classes towards one particular portion of those classes. It is this which is the cause of our misery — the unjust distribution, surrep- titiously made under the form of the National Debt, of the products of the labour of England. " The National Debt was chiefly contracted in two liberticide wars undertaken by the privileged classes of the country ; the first for the purpose of tyrannizing over one portion of their subjects ; Shelley's " Philosophical View of Reform" 6i the second in order to extinguish the resolute spirit of attaining their rights in another. The labour which this money represents, and that which is represented by the money wrung for purposes of the same detestable character out of the people since the commence- ment of the American War, would, if properly employed, have covered our land with monuments of architecture exceeding the sumptuousness and the beauty of Egypt and Athens : it might have made every peasant's cottage a little paradise of comfort, with every convenience desirable in \word undeciphnred], — neat tables and chairs, and good beds, and a collection of useful books ; and our fleet, manned by sailors well-paid and well-clothed, might have kept watch round this glorious island against the less en- lightened nations which assuredly would have envied its prosperity. But the labour which is expressed by these sums has been diverted from these purposes of human happiness to the promotion of slavery, or the attempt at dominion ; and a great portion of the sum in question is debt and must be paid." The payment of the interest falls chiefly on those who had no hand in the creation of the debt, and ■who are sufferers from the transactions in which the money was spent ; and this tax is wrung from them in order to maintain in luxury and indolence the public debtors. It is commonly said that the National Debts were contracted by all classes of the nation for defence against a common danger, and for the vindication of the rights and liberties of pos- terity, and therefore that posterity should bear the burden of payment. This reasoning is most falla- cious ; the debts were largely contracted to carry on wars of revenge, of jealousy, and of ambition. The whole property of the nation is mortgaged for the so-called National Debt ; to use the language of the law, let the mortgage foreclose. One of the first acts of a reformed Government would undoubtedly be an effectual scheme for compelling the debtors and credi- 62 Transcripts and Studies. tors, that is, the privileged classes as a whole, and a certain portion of those classes, to compromise the debt between themselves. Tribunals woidd be appointed to consider and decide upon the claims of every fundholder* There are two descriptions of property, the holders of which are entitled to two very different measures of for- bearance and regard. " Labour, industry, economy, skill, genius, or any similar powers honourably and innocently exerted, are the foundations of one description of property. All true political institutions ought to defend every man in the exercise of his discretion with respect to property so acquired. . . . But there is another species of property which has its foundation in usurpation, or imposture, or violence ; without which, by the nature of things, immense aggregations of property could never have been accumulated. Of this nature is the principal part of the property enjoyed by the aristocracy and by the great fundholders, the majority of whose ancestors never either deserved it by their skill and talents or created it by their personal labour." Claims to property of this latter kind should be com- promised ixnder the supervision of public tribunals. If Shelley advocates confiscation, it is just to remember that he did not write as one of the greedy have-TiQts, but as heir to a large aggregation of wealth, which he was prepared to forfeit. Such, then, would be the action of a reformed Parlia- ment with reference to the National Debt. But what is meant by a reform of Parliament ? Doubtless, from an abstract point of view, universal sufferage is desirable and right ; but abstractedly other and greater changes are also right- — the abolition of monarchy and aristo- cracy, the levelling of inordinate wealth, and an agrarian * I am not quite certain that I understand aright Shelley's proposal. Shelley's " Philosophical View of Reform." 63 distribution of the uncultivated districts of the country. Universal suffrage would assuredly lead to these measures, but in doing so it would assuredly lead to civil war, and this, beside its other attendant evils, would confirm the nation in its military habits, with which true liberty is incompatible. Any sudden attempt to establish universal suffrage would result in an immature attempt to estab- lish a Republic ; and if this should fail, the last state of the nation might be worse than the first. Now, there- fore, in 1819-20, as three years earlier when Shelley wrote at Marlow his pamphlet on Reform, he advocates a gradual reform of the representative system. He would have the House of Lords remain for the present as it is to represent the aristocracy. The House of Commons should represent, in fact and not merely in name, the people. The entire empire might be divided into five hundred districts, each returning one member of Parliament. In each district there would be a popu- lation of 40,000, or, allowing two-thirds for women and children, 13,300 men. A small property qualification, proved by the payment of a certain sum in direct taxes, should distinguish the electors. " Mr Bentham and other writers have urged the admission of females to the right of suffrage. This attempt seems somewhat immature. Should my opinion be the result of despondency, the writer of these pages would be the last to withhold his vote from any system which might tend to an equal and full development of the capacities of all living beings." As to the vote by ballot, the method appeared to Shelley to be too Tnechanical. " The elector and the elected ought to meet face to face and interchange the meanings of actual presence, share some common 64 Transcripts and Studies. impulses, and in a degree understand each other. There ought to be a common sympathy . . . among the electors themselves. The imagination would thus be strongly excited, and a mass of generous and enlarged and popular sentiments be awakened which would give the vitality of [sentenoe unfinished.] That republican boldness of censuring and judging one another, which has been exerted in England under the name of 'public opinion,' though perverted from its true uses into an instrument of prejudice and calumny, would then be applied to its genuine purposes. Year by year the people would become more susceptible of assuming forms of govern- ment more simple and beneficent." The central principle upon which all reform should be based is that of the natural equality of men, jxot as regards property, but as regards rights. The equality taught by Christ is moral rather than political, and it is only as regards abstract principles, not their practical application, that morals and politics can be regarded as parts of the same science. Equality in possessions must be " the last result of the utmost refinements of civilisa- tion." It is a goal on which from far off we may gaze. " We derive tranquillity, and courage, and grandeur of soul from contemplating an object which is, because we will it, and may be, because we hope and desire it, and must be, if succeeding generations of the enlightened sincerely and earnestly seek it.'' From such outlook upon a great and remote object we draw inspiration ; then " it becomes us with patience and resolution to apply ourselves to accommodating theories to immediate practice." Whether the reform, Avhicli is now inevitable, be gradual and moderate or violent and extreme, depends largely on the action of the Government. If the Government compel the nation to take the task of Shelley's ''Philosophical View ofHeform." 65 reformation iuto its own hands, the abolition of monarchy and aristocracy must infallibly follow. "No friend of mankind and of his country can desire that such a crisis should arrive." " If reform shall be begun by the existing government, let us be contented with a limited beginning, with any whatsoever opening. Let the rotten boroughs be disfranchised, and their rights trans- ferred to the unrepresented cities and districts of the nation. It is no matter how slow, gradual, and cautious be the change. We shall demand more and more with firmness and moderation, never anticipating but never deferring the moment of successful opposition, so that the people may become capable of exercising the sfunctions of sovereignty in proportion as they acquire the posses -ion of it. If reform could begin from within the Houses of Par- liament as constituted at present, it appears to me that what is called moderate reform, that is, a suffrage whose qualification should be the possession of a certain small property, and triennial Parliaments, would be principles, a system in which for the sake of obtaining without bloodshed or confusion ulterior improvements of a more important character, all reformers ought to acquiesce. Not that such are first principles, or that they would produce a system of perfect social institution, or one approaching it. But nothing is more idle than to reject a limited benefit because we cannot with- out great sacrifices obtain an unlimited one. We might thus reject a Eepublic, if it were attainable, on the plea that the imagination of man can conceive of something more absolutely perfect. To- wards whatsoever we regard as perfect, undoubtedly, it is no less our duty than it is our nature to press forward ; this is the gener- ous enthusiasm which accomplishes, not indeed the consummation after which it aspires, but one which approaches it in a degree far nearer than if the whole powers had not been developed by delusion which is not a delusion. It is in politics rather than in religion that faith is meritorious." If the Houses of Parliament obstinately and perpetu- ally refuse to concede any reform to the people, Shelley- gives his vote for universal suffrage and equal represen- tation. "But it is asked. How shall this be accom- plished in defiance of, and in opposition to, the consti- £ 66 Transcripts and Studies. tuted authorities of the nation ; they who possess, whether with or without its consent, the command of a standing army and of a legion of spies and police officers, and all the strings of that complicated mechanism with which the hopes and fears of men are moved like puppets ? " This question Shelley meets, and answers by another : " Will you endure to pay the half of your earnings to maintain in luxury and idleness the con- federation of your tyrants as the reward of a successful conspiracy to defraud and oppress you ? Will you make your tame cowardice, and the branding record of it the everlasting inheritance of your degraded posterity ? Not only this, but will you render by your torpid endurance this condition of things as permanent as the system of castes in India, by which the same horrible injustice is perpetrated under another form ? Assuredly no Eng- lishman by whom these propositions are understood will answer in the affirmative, and the opposite side of the alternative remains." When in any nation the majority arrive at a convic- tion that it is their d\ity and their interest to divest the minority of a power employed to their disadvantage, and the minority are sufficiently mistaken as to believe that their superiority is tenable, a struggle must ensue : — " If the majority are enlightened, united, impelled by a uniform enthusiasm, and animateii by a distinct and powerful apprehension, of their object and full confidence in their undoubted power, the struggle is merely nominal. The minority perceive the approaches of the development of an irresistible force, by the influence of the public opinion of their weakness on those political forms, of which no government, but an absolute despotism, is devoid. They divest themselves of their usurped distinctions, and the public tranquillity is not disturbed by the revolution. Shelley" s " Philosophical View of Reform." 67 " But these conditions may only be imperfectly fulfilled by the state of a people jrrossly oppressed and impatient to cast off the load. Their enthusiasm may have been subdued by the killing weight of toil and suffering ; they may be panic-stricken and dis- united by the oppressors and the demagogues; the influence of fraud may have been sufficient to weaken the union of classes which compose them by suggesting jealousies ; and the position of the conspirators, though it is to be forced by repeated assaults, may be tenable until that the siege can be vigorously urged." Under such circumstances as these, what is the duty of a patriotic citizen ? " The true patriot will endeavour to enlighten and to unite the nation, and animate it with enthu.siasm and confidence. For this purpose he will be indefatigable in promulgating political truth. He will endeavour to rally round one standard the divided friends of liberty, and make them forget the subordinate objects with re- gard to which they differ by appealing to that respecting which they are all agreed. He will promote such open confederations among men of principle and spirit as may tend to make their in- tention and their efforts converge to a common centre. He will discourage all secret associations which have a tendency, by mak- ing the nation's will develop itself in a partial and premature manner, to cause tumult and confusion. He will urge the necessity of exciting the people frequently to exercise the right of assemb- ling in such limited numbers as that all present may be actual parties to the measures of the day. Lastly, if circumstances had collected a considerable number, as at Manchester on the memor- able 16lh of August ; if the tyrants send their troops to tire upon them or cut them down unless they disperse, he will exhort them peaceably to defy the danger, and to expect without resistance the onset of the cavalry, and wait with folded arms the event of the • fire of the artillery, and receive with unshrinking bosoms the bayonets of charging battalions. Men are every day persuaded to incur greater perils for a manifest advantage. And this not be- cause active resistance is not justifiable, but because in this instance temperance and courage produce greater advantages than the most decisive victory." Shelley's expectation was that the soldiery, if calmly and courageously met, would refuse to fire upon the 68 Transcripts and Studies. people, and might fraternise with them. "The soldiers are men and Englishmen, and it is not to be believed that they would massacre an unresisting multitude of their countrymen drawn up in unarmed array before them, and bearing in their looks a calm and deliberate resolution to perish rather than abandon the assertion of their rights. In the confusion of flight the soldier becomes confused, and he massacres those who fly from him by the instinct of his trade. In the struggle of conflict and resistance he is irritated by a sense of his own danger ; he is flattered by an apprehension of his own magnanimity in incurring it." But if he should observe neither resistance nor flight he would suddenly be reduced to doubt and indecision. " Thus far his ideas were governed by the same law as those of a dog who chased a flock of sheep to the corner of a field, and keeps aloof when they make the firm parade of re- sistance. But the soldier is a man and an Englishman. This unexpected reception would probably throw him back upon a recollection of the measure of which he was made the instrument, and the enemy might be converted into the ally." Shelley continues to set forth the duties of the patriot under circumstances of difficulty and danger. " The patriot will be foremost to publish the boldest truths in the most fearless manner, yet without the slightest tincture of personal malignity. He would encourage all others to the same efforts and assist them to the utmost of his power with the resources both of his intellect and fortune. He would call upon them to de- spise imprisonment and persecution, and lose no opportunity of bringing the public opinion and the power of the tyrants into cir- cumstances of perpetual contest and opposition." Shelley's "Philosophical View of Reform" 69 All, however, might be ineffectual to produce so uni- form an impulse of the national will as to preclude a further struggle. A considerable mass of the people seem to have fallen into an abject and hopeless apathy, from which it is impossible .to rouse them. " It is in vain to exhort us to wait until all men shall desire free- dom whose real interest will consist in its establishment. It is in vain to hope to enlighten them whilst their tyi'ants employ the utmost artifices of all their compli- cated engines to perpetuate the infection of every species of fanaticism from generation to generation. . . . Infinite and inestimable calamities belong to oppression, but the most fatal of them all is that mine of unexploded mis- chief it has practised* beneath the foundations of society, and with which it threatens to involve the ruin of the whole building together with its own. But delay merely renders those mischiefs more tremendous, not the less inevitable. The savage brutality of the populace is proportioned to the arbitrary character of the Govern- ment ; and tumults and insurrections soon, as in Con- stantinople, become consistent with the permanence of the causing evil, of which they might have been the critical determination.'' It is to be borne in mind that the action on the part of the popular leaders which Shelley advocates, supposes as its condition an obstinate and ever-repeated refusal on the part of a parliament, representing but a narrow constituency, to grant any measure, however moderate, of reform. * An unusual use of the verb practise, meaning, perhaps, like the French pratiquer in an architectural sense, to "contrive." 7© Transcripts and Studies. "The public opinion in England ought first to be excited to action, and the durability of those forms within which the oppressors entrench themselves, brought perpetually to the test of its opera- tion. To that purpose government ought to be defied, in cases of questionable result, to prosecute for political libel. All questions relating to the jurisdiction of magistrates, and courts of law, respecting which any doubt could be raised, ought to be agitated with indefatigable pertinacity. Some two or three of the popular leaders have shown the best spirit in this respect,* only they want system and co-operation. The tax-gatherer ought to be compelled in every practicable instance to distrain ; whilst the right to impose taxes, as was the case in the beginning of the resistance to the tyranny of Charles I., [should be] formally contested by an overwhelming multitude of defendants before the courts of common law." So the subtlety of lawyers should be confounded by the subtlety of the law. " The nation would thus be excited to develop itself, and to declare whether it acquiesced in the existing forms of Government. The manner in which all questions of this nature might be decided, would develop the occasions and afford a prog- nostic as to the success of more decisive measures. Simultaneously with this active and vigilant spirit of opposition, means ought to be taken of solemnly convey- ing the sense of large bodies and various denominations of the people in a manner the most explicit to the exist- ing depositories of power. The system of petitioning, but couched in the actual language of the petitioners and emanating from distinct assemblies, ought to load the tables of the House of Commons." Further, men of letters, artists, men of science ought to remonstrate, and their memorials and petitions might show the degrees of conviction they entertain of the inevitable connection * Probably Shelley thought of the editors of TKt Examiner, John and Leigh Hunt. Shelley's "Philosophical View of Reformr 71 between freedom and the cultivation of the imagination, the cultivation of scientific truth, and the development of morals and metaphysical inquiry. " Suppose these me- morials to be severally written by Godwin, and Hazlitt, and Bentham,* and Hunt, they would be worthy of the age and of the cause, and like the meridian sun, would strike all but the eagles who dared to gaze upOn its beams with blindness and confusion. These appeals of solemn and emphatic argument from those who have already a predestined existence among posterity would appal the enemies of mankind by their echoes from every corner of the world in which the majestic litera- ture of England is cultivated. It would be like a voice from beyond the dead of those who will live in the memories of men when they must be forgotten ; it would be eternity warning time." At this stage of the progress of reform it is probable that the strength of the national will would be felt, and would be acknowledged by the reluctant concession of some limited portion of their rights to the people. " In this case the people ought to be exhorted by everything dear to them to pause, until by the exercise of those rights which they have regained, they become fitted to demand more." It is better that we should gain what we demand by a process of negotiation which would occupy twenty years than that we should do anything which might tend towards civil war. If, however, our rulers are hopelessly perverse and blind, if they " consider the chance of personal ruin and the infamy of figuring * Lord Byron was first written, then was cancelled, and Bentham written in its place. y.t ' Ti'anscripts and Studies. . ■ on the page of history as the promoters of civil war preferable to resigning any portion, how small soever, of their usurped authority, we are to recollect that we possess a right beyond remonstrance. It has been ac- knowledged by the most approved writers on the English Constitution that we possess a right of resistance. The claim of the reigning family is founded upon a memor- able execution of this solemnly recorded right. The last resort of resistance is undoubtedly insurrection. The right of insurrection is derived from the employment of armed force to counteract the will of the nation. Let the Government disband the standing army, and the purpose of resistance would be sufficiently fulfilled by the incessant agitation of the points of dispute before the courts of common law, and by an unwarlike display of the irresistible number and union of the people." Before entering on a consideration of the measures which might terminate in civil war, Shelley briefly con- siders the nature and the consequences of war. There is a secret sympathy between destruction and power, between monarchy and war, and the history of all re- corded time teaches us with what success they have played into each other's hands. " War is a kind of superstition ; the parade of arms and badges corrupts the imagination of men. How far more appropWate would be the symbols of an inconsolable grief, muffled drums, and melan- choly music, and arms reversed, the livery of sorrow. "When men mourn at funerals, for what do they mourn in comparison with the calamities which they hasten with all circumstance of festivity to suifer and to inflict 1 Visit in imagination the scene of a field of battle or a city taken by assault. Collect we into one group the groans and the distortions of the innumerable dying, the inconsol- able grief and horror of their sorrowing friends, the hellish exulta- Shelley^ s " Philosophical View of Reform^ 'j^ tion and unnatural drunkenness of destruction of the conquerors, the burning of the harvests, and the obliteration of the traces of cultivation. To this in civil war is to be added the sudden disrup- tion of the bonds of social life, and ' father against son.' If there had never been war there could never have been tyranny in the world. Tyrants take advantage of the mechanical organization of armies to establish and defend their encroachments. It is thus that the mighty advantages of the French Revolution have been almost compensated by a succession of tyrants ; for demagogues, oligarchies, usurpers, and legitimate kings are merely varieties of the same class from Eobespierre to Louis XVIII.'' But the greatest evil resulting from war is that it creates a sentiment in favour of brute force, and dimin- ishes our faith in moral influences. " War waged from whatever motive extinguishes the sentiment of reason and justice in the mind. The motive is forgotten or only adverted to in a mechanical and habitual manner. A sentiment of confidence in brute force and in a contempt of death and danger is considered as the highest virtue, when in truth, however indis- pensable to [virtue], they are merely the means and the instru- ments highly capable of being perverted to destroy the cause they were assumed to promote. It is a foppery the most intolerable to an amiable and philosophical mind. It is like what some reasoners have observed of religious faith — no fallacious and indirect motive to action can subsist in the mind without weakening the efi'ect of those which are genuine and true. The person who thinks it virtuous to believe, will think a less degree of virtue attaches to good actions than if he had considered it indifferent. The person who has been accustomed to subdue men by force will be less in- clined to the trouble of convincing or persuading them." These considerations may make the true friend of mankind pause before he recommends measures tending towards the grievous calamity of war. " I imagine, however," adds Shelley, " that before the English nation shall arrive at that point of moral and political degrada- tion now occupied by the Chinese, it will be necessary to appeal to an exertion of physical strength." 74 Transcripts and Studies. Here we have almost reached the end of the manu- script. A hiank space of two leaves is left, and in the sentences of the last fragment Shelley contemplates the future victory of the people and the duties which accompany that victory. " When the people shall have obtained by whatever means the victory over their oppressors, and when persona appointed by them shall have taken their seats in the Representative assembly of the nation, and assumed the control of public affairs according to con- stitutional rules, then will remain the great task of accommodating all that can be preserved of ancient forms with the improvements of the knowledge of a more enlightened age in legislation, juris- prudence, government, and religious and academical institutions. The settlement of the National Debt is, on the principles before elucidated, merely an affair of form, and however necessary and important, is an affair of mere arithmetical proportions readily de- termined ; nor can I see how those who, being deprived of their unjust advantages, will probably inwardly murmur, can oppose one word of open expostulation to a measure of such irrefragable justice. There is one thing, which vulgar agitators endeavour to flatter the most uneducated part of the people by assiduously pro- posing, which they ought not to do nor to require — and that is Retribution. " Men having been injured desire, to injure in return. This is falsely called an universal law of human nature ; it is a law from which many are exempt, and all in proportion to their virtue and cultivation. The savage is more revengeful than the civilised man, the ignorant and uneducated than the person of a refined and cul- tivated intellect, the generous and " With which unfinished sentence the " Philosophical View of Reform " ends. It could close with no more sacred thought or word than that of reconciliation — " word over all, beautiful as the sky." LAST WORDS ON SHELLEY. Some critics of my " Life of Shelley," the reviewers, if I remember rightly, in The, Times, the Athenceum, and the Quarterly B^view, noticed with some surprise or regret the fact that I nowhere attempted to give a general view or estimate — a " synthesis " as one of them called it — of Shelley's character, and genius, and work in literature. My reserve in this respect was of course not the result of accident ; I felt, and still feel, that such deliberate reserve was right and wise. The writer of a short study may legitimately present a view in which generalisation has done its full work ; he may reduce what is complex to a simple conception, and arrange a mass of various details under some dominant idea. But such ought not to be the procedure of a biographer, certainly not of a biographer whose aim is to paint a portrait, following at however great a distance these masters who have painted portraits in the great style. His synthesis must be implicit, and if it be present everywhere in a vital way, he will do well to leave it so, and allow others, if they please, to make it exp^l-icit. His general conception guides and governs his work from first to last, but at each moment he seems wholly occupied with the endeavour to set down faithfully the colours and the lines which he sees while his eyes are fixed upon some part of the object before him. It is 76 Transcripts and Studies. his desire to show a living creature and not an abstrac- tion of the intellect; to display the opal with all its mingling hues, its luminous shadows, and cloudy bright- nesses ; to paint the pigeon's neck and all its shifting dyes, changeful with every stir of life. For the inter- pretation of human character an anecdote may be more valuable than a theory. Dead facts on the one hand and abstract ideas on the other are the Scylla and Charybdis of the biographer; between them lies his difficult way, in the flow of reality and living truth. I had, to be sure, my own notion of Shelley, but whether it be philosophical enough to deserve the name of a synthesis I cannot say ; it certainly had its origin in no partial survey or incomplete analysis of the facts. I thought of Shelley — so we all think of him — as a man of extraordinary sensitiveness and susceptibility, suscep- tibility above all to ideal impressions ; and I further thought of him as instinctively craving something to balance his own excessive sensitiveness, something to control his mobility of feeling, something to steady his advance and give him poise. A law he needed, but a law which should steady his advance, not one which should trammel it or hold him in motionless equili- brium. Coming at a time when the ideas of the Revolution were in the air, he found what served him as a law in those ideas, as declared by their most eminent English spokesman, William Godwin. A lyrical nature attempting to steady its advance by the revolutionary abstractions — such was Shelley. And his work in literature represents on the one hand his own mobile temperament, his extraordinary sensitiveness and Last Words on Shelley. 77 marvellous imagination, and on the other hand the zeit-geist, the spirit of 1789, as formulated by Godwin in a code of morals, rigid, passionless, and doctrinaire, yet containing a hidden fire, and glowing inwardly with ardent anticipations. The volumes of " Political Justice " were thus for Shelley at once a law and a gospel. By his temperament and constitution Shelley was little disposed to acquiesce in traditional and conven- tional ways of thought, presented to him, as these were in his own household, in a fashion which lacked real charm and inspiration. There lay in his instinctive feelings enough that was peculiar or singular to draw his understanding sideways from the paths of use and wont. What attracts the average boy did not attract Shelley ; and when his feelings were driven into opposition, it was natural and indeed inevitable, that his intellect should go hand in hand with his feelings to interpret and justify them. Persecuted by the swarm of young marauders at Eton, he was driven in upon himself. Loosened from the moorings of traditional belief, if he ever had such moorings, he was prepared to accept a new gospel, and precisely at this moment Godwin's remarkable book fell into his hands. Many of us probably could tell, each from his own experience, how some one author or some one book, coming to us at a fortunate moment in youth, has been a key to unlock for us the mysteries of exist- ence ; how it has been to us the revelation sole and single of wisdom ; how it has fed our highest feelings and shaped our desires and our resolves. Some of us have found in Wordsworth such a master, some perhaps in Carlyle, or Goethe, or Browning, or Newmam, or George 78 Transcripts and Studies. Eliot, or Emerson, or Comte ; and even when the hours of single-hearted devotion have passed and we come under other influences and wander hither and thither, we yet cherish a peculiar gratitude, a loyalty, a piety towards him who was the inspirer and master of our youth. Such a master and inspirer Shelley found in the author of " Political Justice." Wherein lay the extraordinary attraction of Godwin's philosophy for Shelley ? No two men could be less like each other than the sensitive, enthu,siastic disciple, and the elderly philosopher who had schooled his temperate feelings, as far as might be, into a monotony of calm. How was it that Godwin came to wield a tyrannous power over Shelley's understanding ? The answer is that Godwin's philosophy brought to Shelley something which his imagination demanded, and something which was needful to his character. Godwin with his abstract principles made a clean sweep of tradition and all the accumulated treasures and all the accumulated lumber of the past ; these same principles, viewed as the ] foundation of a new human society, authorised boundless hopes for the future. It suited Shelley's imagination to I have an open space, a vast clearing wherein to erect its! visionary splendours, a vacant heaven wherein to build' the palaces of cloudland. But besides this, the fact] that Shelley experienced all the troubles of an eager, never-satisfied heart, predisposed him to accept as a counterpoise to his own disturbing passions a philosophy so strict in its ideal of duty, so free from the riot of temperament and the consequent relapse into depression, as was the doctrinaire system of Godwin. Nothing is Last Words on Shelley. 79 expressed more frequently or more forcibly in Shelley's poetry than his ecstacy in the approach and his anguish in the passing of delight. The flux and vicissitude of emotion is the ever-recurring subject of his song. We are as clouds " that speed and gleam and quiver " across the midnight moon, and soon night closes round and they are lost. We are as lyres — " Whose dissonant strings Give various response to each varying blast, To -whose frail frame no second motion brings One mood or modulation like the last." In the " Hymn to Intellectual Beauty " it is the thought of the sudden apparition and then the sudden withdrawal of the ideal light which gladdens and sad- dens the poet's heart. Now Godwin's philosophy, while on the one hand it was a chariot from which Shelley's wild-eyed hopes could lean forward to drink the wind of their own speed, was on the other hand an intellec- tual counterpoise to his excitable temperament. It seemed to give fixity, or at least the calm of a sublime law, to the flux of circumstance and the tumult of pas- sions. It was a doctrine of the reason, a code of duty, and at the same time an evangel of hope. What more or what better could Shelley desire than a creed which, while it gave larger scope and range to the emotions, brought them under a glorious law, and delivered them from the pain and passion of all merely egoistic or personal feeling ? And Shelley did in truth find something to steady him in Godwin's philosophy ; it became a kind of pole- siar, lending a guidance to his erratic course. To it 8o Transcripts and Studies. and to his ideals he continued in essentials true through all the years of his life, if inconstant in not a few of his affections and admirations. This was not wholly ill for Shelley. But how much better it were if instead of throwing himself for support and sustenance on a system of abstract doctrines, he had thrown himself upon the facts of life an(i tried to get into, close and fruitful rela- tion with reality. Such a rigid, doctrinaire^ system of thought as that of Godwin tends as much as 'anything can to seclude one from the direct and' faithful teaching of experience. And how dull and clumsy a teacher is the closet philosopher when compared with that infinitely quick and subtle doctor, life ! Throw yourself upon life, and you are touched by truth on every side and in the finest ways. View life through the loopholes of a philosophic fortress, and you get at best certain gross and obvious lessons of wisdom. These abstractions have a rigidity about them which will not allow them to work cunningly into character. How fortunate it is when an emotional and imagin- ative nature can steady itself by the slow discipline of reality rather than by the clumsy support of certain abstractions, half of which perhaps are rotten props ! This wiser way was Shakspere's and was not Shelley's. But through his quick sympathies and through a few trumpet-tongued utterances of life the truths of human Jk*- J existence did in fact reach Shelley ; in spite of Godwin's ^Ol^*^!!*. theories, which hedged him in, the pain and the joy of t^ 1 events and of living relations with men and women touched him and b y degrees matured his mind. Mr Leslie Stephen has traced some of the effects pro- Last Words on Shelley. 8i duced by Godwin's philosophy on Shelley's imaginative creations. The fact of Godwin's influence was noticed long since. In an early review of Shelley's poetry which has hitherto escaped notice, one published during his lifetime in an obscure and short-lived journal,* the fact is commented on with considerable ability, and from a hostile point of view. " It does not strike us as a task by any means difficult to colour the cold speculations of Godwin with the language of poetry, though we think such subjects would be avoided by a poetical mind. That a state of society may be imagined in which men will be ' kingless, and tribeless, and nationless,' we admit, and even feel that the conception has an imposing and sublime appearance, in the same way that the idea of utter desolation is sublime ; but we must remember that these notions are put forward by Mr Shelley with avowed admiration of the consequences he expects to result from their being applied to the test of experience. Now we must continue to believe that such views are likely to lessen the exercise of the domestic charities ; that when no adequate object is offered to the affections, they will, being left without support, droop and die in the heart. We believe that man's duty here is something different from comparing phantoms with phantoms ; and that whatever his talents, or whatever his professed object may be, no man is justified in giving to the world wild and crude notions, the first effect of which, if reduced to practice, would be the overthrow of all existing institutions and the substitution of a waste and howling wilderness — the revolutionary Eden, of which the uncontrolled passions of men are to be protecting angels.'' The objections to Shelley's poetical interpretation of Godwin's doctrines could hardly be better expressed in few words by a determined adversary. Mr Leslie Stephen has drawn out the indictment at length. But I am not aware that any one has shown, though it has been often referred to, how powerfully Godwin's book, * "Critical Remarks on Shelly's (m.c) Poetry," in the Dnhlin Magazine,, vol. ii. (July — December, 1820) p. 393. 82 Transcripts and Studies. " Political Justice," influenced Shelley's life and conduct. No one can understand aright either Shelley's poetry or his life who has not formed some acquaintance with the master's teaching so faithfully translated by the disciple into action and into song. The words " political justice " express a great ten- dency, and in some respects an admirable tendency of the Revolution and revolutionary thinkers. It means that politics, and in general the dealings of men with one another, should be regulated not by a shallow ex- pediency but by the deeper expediency of justice ; it means that politics and the social order should be moralised. But what is morality ? With Godwin it is simply the application of reason to life. We bring with us into the world, according to Godwin, no rule of right, no innate ideas, no tendencies to good or evil. If we learn the truth we shall certainly do the right ; we can- not but yield to the force of the stronger argument. If ever we do evil, it is because our knowledge is im- perfect or because there is a fallacy in our logic. Mor- ality in a high sense is possible for him alone who has a wide perception of truth and a fully enlightened understanding. And in proportion to a man's enlighten- ment he must of necessity be virtuous, because he comes under the influence of motives which leave him no choice but to act aright. Error and ignorance are the sources of all vice ; vice, indeed, is but a form of error, and virtue is merely knowledge transformed into act. The first dxity, therefore, of one who is himself a virtuous being and desires to make other men good must be to wage war by argument against ignorance, prejudice, and Last Words on Shelley. 83 error, and to spread by all fair means a knowledge of the truth. Imagine such ideas as these coming into contact with the mind of a boy of fervid temper, and possessed of considerable argumentative ability. They would forth- with transform him into an intellectual combatant, a militant young apostle. He must instantly address himself to attack the prejudices and ignorances of his fellows and to gain converts for the truth. If the vic- tim of prejudice happen to be some fair being of an- other sex than his own, the task of dissipating her cloud of error may be at once an act of virtue and an exqui- site delight. But even the head of a collegiate house or a bishop on the bench, though deeply benighted in ignorance, is not unworthy of enlightenment, and the mistaken man must at last yield to the stress of trium- phant logic. When Shelley became a propagandist of ideas at Eton, when he entered into what he styled a " polemical correspondence'' with Felicia Browne, or Harriet Grove, or Harriet Westbrook, or Elizabeth Kitchener, when he assailed this or that clerical stranger with sceptical argument, when he distributed the Oxford pamphlet which led to his expulsion from University College, he was only acting out, according to his lights, the first principles of " Political Justice." Many are the errors and prejudices of mankind, but, according to Godwin, the two giant impostures which have demoralised the human race are religion and govern- ment. " Error is principally indebted for its perman- ence to social institution." Political government is " that brute engine which has been the only perennial 84 Transcripts and Studies. cause of the vices of mankind." " We cannot hesitate to conclude universally that law is an institution of the most pernicious tendency." Religion is " in all its parts an accommodation to the prejudices and weaknesses of mankind," and therefore it exists by its sufferance of vice. We are forbidden by true philosophy to indulge "wrath or indignation against any hiiman creature, for all act necessarily, and no one can be other than he is ; but if it were permitted us to be enraged, we might indeed feel a boundless rage against kings and priests. In general the idea of authority, whether temporal or spiritual, was abhorrent to Godwin ; virtue is the recog- nition of reason in all our thoughts, words, and deeds, and if we substitute authority for reason we lapse from virtue and expose ourselves to every possibility of wrong-doing. To war against authority as such is there- fore a duty of the virtuous man. It is only surprising that Shelley, inspired by such ideas, boy as he was and full of impetuosity, did not dash himself more violently against the rule and order of society. The conviction, derived also from Godwin, that the advance of men towards perfection is a long and a slow process, came to temper his extravagance of hope and desire. Perhaps at the present day we are likely to do some injustice to Shelley viewed as the militant champion of ideas. We have been so much occupied with the natural history of human beliefs, we have come to accept so fully the doctrine that every creed and every form of society corresponds with some general condition of the human mind, and is a natural product, as we say, of the organism and its environment, Last Words on Shelley. 85 that we find absolute truth nowhere, and nowhere ab- solute falsehood. And so we recognise each form of belief as natural in its time and place, and find it al- most impossible to make a relentless, unqualified attack on any widespread faith. But such was not the revolu- tionary point of view. Shelley, with Godwin for his guide, viewed all beliefs from the dogmatic standpoint of the reason. In " Political Justice" he had found truth absolute ; the popular beliefs were superstitions more or less gross, but all untrue ; and since truth and know-' ledge are the sources of virtue, and ignorance and error are of the nature of vice, the young champion was urged forward by his highest thoughts and purest feelings to do battle against the darkness that lay around. The philosophical system of Godwin, while it cuts at the roots of all natural piety, could have no attraction for one who was low-thoughted or a mere lover of self. Its seductive power lay in the fact that it set up a standard of duty far loftier and far stricter than that recognised by the average man, while at the same time it sapped the instinctive religion of the heart. Self was to become nothing ; reason with each of us was to be all in all. But not only was self to become nothing, filial piety, personal reverence, the bonds of friendship, the vows of love, gratitude to a benefactor, were to be trans- cended as unworthy of the votary of reason — or rather they were to be opposed, crushed, set at nought, for friendship, filial piety, regard to pledges and promises, gratitude, are of the nature of vice. What magic, Godwin asks, is there in the word I ? My benefactor ! It was my benefactor's duty to serve me, or it was not. If 86 Transcripts and Studies. it was his duty, I am under no obligation to him ; but if it was not his duty, I am compelled by reason to condemn his conduct. My father and my mother ! Why should the accident that a man and woman brought me into the world, possibly through no high sense of duty, nor in compliance with the dictates of reason, why should this constitute a peculiar claim on my obedience or affection ? As a son 1 have indeed special oppor- tunities of being useful to them, and it may be right to use those opportunities ; but if my reason informs me that my services are more useful to the species when bestowed elsewhere, those services are in no sense due to my parents. Shelley viewing his father — the dull, pompous, country squire — from the standpoint of reason, could not place him high in the ranks of human beings. Why venerate one who, ^egaxd^'impartially, was the reverse of venerable? As to the gratitude supposed to be due to a father, gratitude, according to the law of reason, is a vice. " I will try the force of truth on that mistaken man," wrote Shelley, with a magnanimous sense of superiority to a father who was not a votary of reason. And having on one occasion tried its force, he found that his father's arguments were " equine" — those of a headstrong horse. Why venerate an old horse ? It is to the credit of Shelley's nature that in spite of the teaching of " Political Justice " his letters to his father were in general respectful, courteous, and conciliating. Shelley's seeming tolerance of vice has surprised and shocked some persons who gladly do honour to his genius. Not many weeks after his marriage his closest friend made an attempt to mislead the child-wife. Last Words on Shelley. 87 Harriet, during her husband's absence. A breach of friendship naturally ensued. But a few months pass ; the parted comrades meet in London ; Shelley with no difSculty restores the wrongdoer to his regard and rein- troduces him to Harriet. Again, late in life Shelley was informed by Byron of certain monstrous accusations brought against him. The charge of cruelty shocked him and called forth an outbreak of indignation ; but he speaks, and that in a letter to his wife, of infidelity to the marriage bond as though it were no crime but at worst an " error." In these instances Shelley merely acted and spoke as a faithful disciple of the master who had taught him, as he says, all of virtue and of know- ledge. For what is vice ? It is, according to Godwin, no more than an intellectual error, a mistaken calculation of consequences. To feel indignant with one who commits a crime is in the highest degree unreasonable. The criminal acted according to the preponderance of motives at the moment of the deed, and he could not have acted otherwise. " The assassin cannot help the murder he commits any more than the dagger." * Had the motives been presented to him aright he must needs have acted virtuously. Godwin admits that for the sake of convenience he has not adopted throughout his treatise the language of the doctrine of necessity ; but Shelley was more consistent. If the wrongdoer towards Harriet at York should have escaped from the "prejudice" which misled him, Shelley could gladly take him to his heart again. And it was strictly in accordance with the teaching of " Political Justice " that he should speak of * "Political Justice," book vii., chap. 1. 88 Transcripts and Studies. conjugal infidelity and the alleged seduction of an inti- mate friend as an " error," error being the Godwinian term for what we unphilosophical speakers name vice and crime. That his natural sense of what is right should be sapped by a philosophy so crude as that of Godwin may seem to indicate that there was something wrong with Shelley's heart or his intellect. But in truth the doctrine was specious in its sophistry ; it gained the enthusiastic devotion of Wordsworth and Coleridge for a time in their earlier days ; it represented all the high hopes and pure enthusiasm of the dawn of the French Eevolution. New truths and new and noble ardours were allied with the revolutionary errors. Shelley's best and purest feelings connected themselves with the teach- ing of Godwin. It is easy to understand how a youth of high moral 'and social aim might come to believe in the evil days of the Regency that the special need of England was to oppose the existing order of things and to sustain the better and purer spirit of the great move- ment inaugurated in France. Shelley was not himself in any distinguished degree an original thinker. He accepted with the enthusiasm of a poet doctrines which seemed to him to contain the hope and promise of the future of the human race ; he animated those doctrines with the emotional ardour of his own spirit, and gave them form and colour by the creative power of his imagination. And here I would say a few words on the subject of Shelley's separation from his first wife, which most persons regard, and regard justly, as a central point in Last Words on Shelley. 89 his life, and one which must go far to determine our estimate of his character. Some of the critics of my " Life of Shelley " seem to consider that I did not pro- nounce a moral judgment on this passage of Shelley's story with sufficient firmness. But a biographer's first duty is to trace the history of a human being as far as possible from within : to follow the involved windings of the stream of life, to go with it through the difficult rapids, and to do this, if possible, with skilled courage. While he must never confound moral distinctions or practise the sophistry of refining away the plain differ- ence between right and wrong, the biographer will do wisely to avoid the didactic attitude ; he will do wisely to practise some reserve in pronouncing such moral judg- ments as are pronounced from a pulpit or a platform. The living moral law must be present in the truth of his story ; it must be part of the natural history, part of the physiology of his book ; and if it be this no more is needed. We know too little of the facts of the six months which ended with the final rupture between Shelley and his wife to warrant much moral hard hitting. I could not indulge in hard hitting, because a sense of right and justice restrained me, and because I felt that only a part of the case was known to me. But what is undoubtedly a portion of the truth would have lived more actively in my story if I had shown more fully and clearly how Godwin's teaching in " Political Justice" had prepared a way for the catastrophe. " Delicacy forbids me to say more," Shelley wrote at a later time and on a solemn occasion, " than that we were disunited by incurable dissensions." Dissensions 90 Transcripts and Studies. between husband and wife unhappily are not of such rare occurrence that we can look on them as very extraordin- ary in the case of Shelley and Harriet. But in general, ■ although relations may be strained, there is a binding and restraining force in duty or religion or regard for I the opinion of society, or in mature age, which prevents the resort to extreme measures, and things settle down into a kind of discomfortable calm, or perhaps an armed neutrality. The centrifugal forces are there, but the centripetal forces are in some degree more powerful and .overcome them. Now what centripetal forces existed in the case of Shelley ? Encouraged by the volume which had taught him all of virtue, he had trained himself to set the opinion of society at defiance. The binding force of religion was, of course, entirely lacking. The restraining influence of mature age in his case did not exist. A certain sense of duty he had indeed, for he was not altogether a doctrinaire philosopher, and he could not but feel the rending of those ties which bind together a husband and wife who have lived in mutual affection during two years. And we know that he pleaded piteously, almost despairingly, with Harriet for a restoration of her love. But the centripetal forces were weak in comparison with the centrifugal, and when Shelley found his own heart drawn a different way, and persuaded himself that his wife had transferred her affections from himself to another, what influence remained to hold husband and wife together 1 The marriage vow was less than a rope of sand or twist of straw. A promise or vow, according to Godwin, is Last Words on Shelley. 91 of the nature of vice, because it binds our future conduct by an artificial rule, whereas our conduct at every moment of our lives ought to be governed by reason, and by reason alone. It is positively vicious — so Shelley learnt from " Political Justice " — for hus- band and wife to remain united after the union has ceased to contribute to their common happiness. "It is absurd," Godwin wrote, "to expect that the inclinations and wishes of two human beings should coincide through any long period of time. To oblige them to act and to live together is to subject them to some inevitable portion of thwarting, bickering, and unhappiness. . . . The supposition that I must have a com- panion for life is the result of a complicatioa of vices. It is the dictate of cowardice, and not of fortitude. . . . The habit is for a thoughtless and romantic youth of each sex to come together, to see each other for a few times and under circumstances full of de- lusion, and then to vow to each other eternal attachment. What is the consequence of this ? In almost every instance they iind them- selves deceived. . . . The institution of marriage is a system of fraud, and men who carefully mislead their judgments in the daily affair of their life must always have a crippled judgment in every other concern. . . . Marriage is law, and the worst of laws. . . . So long as two human beings are forbidden to follow the dictates of their own mind, prejudice is alive and vigorous. So long as I seek to engross one woman to myself, and to prohibit my neighbour from proving his superior desert and reaping the fruits of it, I am guilty of the most odious of monopolies." In the future millennium as imagined by Godwin, men upon this earth will be immortal, for mind will have gained a complete conquest over matter, and the race of immortals will cease to propagate the species ; but long before that golden age a state far happier than the pre- sent will have been attained, when at each moment free man or free woman may at pleasure elect his or her own partner ; when the father of each individual child will be^ 92 Transcripts and Studies. unknown, and surnames will have been abolished. Can we wonder that the youth Shelley, who had drunk with eagerness these Godwinian tidings of great joy, should think scorn of the old plain law honoured in the homes of England ? Yet Godwin's influence on Shelley was by no means wholly for evil, and Shelley's life and work, which ex- hibit all the errors of the revolutionary epoch, exhibit also the better spirit of the time. " Beautiful and ineffectual angel, beating in the void his luminous wings in vain" — so he is described by Mr Matthew Arnold. " The real is the true world for a great poet, but it was not Shelley's world ". — so the late Professor of Poetry at Oxford, Principal Shairp, pro- nounced judgment. " Oast Shelley at once aside as shallow and verbose," says Mr Ruskin. These are names of high authority, but we may pause a moment before accepting the utterances as true. For my own part I feel that some of the visions which Shelley's poetry conjures up as I read it, are but phan- toms, showing thin and ghostlike indeed when I turn from them to the men and women of Shakspere's plays or Scott's novels. In one of his most beautiful sonnets, Wordsworth tells how on the evening of a day memorable to him — the day of his marriage — he and his bride beheld in the scenery of the clouds a wonderful pageant ; Indian citadel, Grecian temple, minster and bell-tower, islands and groves and seas visibly exprest in the western heavens. But, says Wordsworth, we felt the while we should forget them : " They are of the sky, And from our earthly memory fade a'W^.^J' Last Words on Shelley. 93 So I sometimes feel when gazing at the cloud-like splendours of Shelley's verse ; the splendours will die down into grey ashes of sunset, and I shall be unable to keep the memory of them alive within me. " They are of the sky, And from my earthly memory fade away." But two reflections offer themselves to me. The first is that now and again in a hard-working day, one glance into the upper heavens at dawn, or noon, or sun- set, has been the most solidly precious moment of the day, has been the elixir vitce of the four-and-twenty hours, and even though it may be wholly forgotten, it has sent a pulse of exquisite sensation to mingle hence- forth unconsciously with all that I do and all that I am. And, secondly, I reflect that the radiant clouds expressed the powers of the sun and of the winds which come to me all day and every day, and are a portion of my life. Idealist as he was, Shelley lived in some important respects in closer and more fruitful relation with the real world than did his great contemporary, Scott. Because he lived with ideas, he apprehended with some- thing like prophetic insight those great forces which have been altering the face of the world during this nineteenth century, and which we sum up under the names of democracy and science ; and he apprehended them not from the merely material point of view, but from that of a spiritual being, uniting in his vision with democracy and science a third element not easy to name or to define, an element of spirituality which has been most potent in the higher thought and feeling of our time. Many strange phantasies had Shelley, but nq 94 Transcripts and Studies. phantasy quite so remote from reality as that of building himself a mock feudal castle, or of living in a world half made up of the modern pseudo-antique. Many strange phantasies he had, but none so strange as phantasies of later date ; none so strange as that of reviving the faith of the twelfth century in English brains to-day ; none so feebly wild as that of drawing a curtain of worn-out shreds to hide the risen sun of science. As regards science, it is obvious enough that Shelley possessed in no degree the scientific intellect. He was far from being able to contribute to science such anticipations of imagi- native genius as those which make the name of Goethe illustrious in botany and comparative anatomy. But Shelley expressed a poet's faith in science and a poet's hopes. Wordsworth, incomparably a greater thinker than Shelley, expressed a poet's fears — fears by no means wholly unjustified — that the pursuit of analytic investigation in things material might dull the eye for what is vital and spiritual in nature and in man. Wordsworth recognised a part of the fact, but Shelley's feelings attached themselves to the more important side of truth in this matter. " Beautiful and ineffectual angel beating in the void his luminous wings in vain." No, not in the void, but amid the prime forces of the modern world ; and this ineffectual angel was one of the heralds of the dawn — dawn portentous, it may be, but assuredly real. I recognise in Shelley all the illusions and sophisms of the revolutionary epoch. I recoo-nise the vagueness of much of his humanitarian rhetoric. But humanitarian rhetoric sometimes may be practical beneficence in a nebulous state ; let it condense and Last Words on Shelley. 95 solidify, and the luminous mist becomes an orb of love — the stout heart of one who would serve the needy and the downcast of our race. If love, justice, hope, free- dom, fraternity, be real, then so is the wiser part of the inspiration of Shelley's radiant song. If, then, Shelley -^did not hover ineffectually in the void, may we not attempt to define his historical position in our literature ? Perhaps it is not rash to assert that when this century of ours is viewed from a point in the distant future, it will be seen that among many great facts of the century the largest and most important are those expressed by the words democracy and science. And what, if we should sum it up in one word, is the leading idea given by democracy to literature? In mediseval times the heroes on whom imagination fixed its gaze were two, the chivalric knight and the ascetic saint — great and admirable figures. With us the hero is, if you please, no hero at all, but simply the average man. For him we think and toil ; our most earnest hopes and wishes are for him. Or, since after all we want a hero, let us say, instead of " ths average man," the race, or humanity. And now what, expressed in a single word, is the ruling idea of science ? What word can we choose except the great and venerable word, law ? Here, then, are two eminent words of our century — the race, or humanity, given to us by democracy ; law, given to us by science. Let us connect the two, and we obtain the expression " humanity subject to -law " — that is, we have the conception of human progress or evolution. Hence this phrase " progress of humanity," however it may have been spoilt for dainty lips by cheap and vulgar 96 Transcripts and Studies. trumpeting, and however we may recognise the fact that for a day or a year, or a group of years, the world's advance may halt on palsied feet — this word, this idea, this faith has had for our age something like the force of a religion. And as the inspiring faith of our century has been this faith in the progress or evolution of man, so its heresy has been the heresy of pessimism ; and in literature, side by side with the stronger poetry of hope, there has been a feebler poetry of despair. In the earlier years of our century the democratic movement concerned itself too exclusively with the indi- vidual and his rights, and regarded too little his duties, affections, and privileges as a member of society. It is greatly to the advantage of Shelley's work as a poet, and greatly to his credit as a man, that he assigns to love, that which links us to our fellows, some of the power and authority which Godwin ascribes to reason alone.* The French Revolution had been in a great measure a destruction of the ancient order of society, and such poetry as that of Byron, sympathising with the revolur tion, is too reckless an assertion of individual freedom. Shelley was deeply infected with the same errors. But it is part of the glory of his poetry that in some degree he anticipated the sentiment of this second half of our century, when we desire more to construct or reconstruct than to destroy. Shelley's ideas of a reconstruction of society are indeed often vague or visionary ; but there is always present in his poetry the sentiment or feelinc * Godwin, however, it may be noted, desired to banish from philo- sophy the phrase, "rights of man." Claims he would allow, but never riyhts. Last Words on Shelley. 97 which tends to reconstruction, the feeling of love ; and the word " fraternity " is for him at least as potent as the word " liberty." In Byron we find an expression of the revolution on its negative side ; in Shelley we find this, but also an expression of the revolution on its positive side. As the wave of revolution rolls onward, driven forth from the vast volcanic upheaval in France, and as it becomes a portion of the literary movement of Great Britain, its dark and hissing crest may be the poetry of Byron ; but over the tumultuous wave hangs an iris of beauty and promise, and that foam-bow of hope, flashing and failing, and ever reappearing as the wave sweeps on, is the poetry of Shelley. There is a kind of wisdom, and a very precious kind, of which we find singularly little in Shelley's poetry. The wisdom of common sense, which enables us to steer our way amid the rocks and shoals of life ; the wisdom of large benignant humour ; the wisdom of the ripened fruits of experience ; the wisdom' of those axioms inter- mediate between first principles and practical details — those axiomata media which in science Bacon regards as so important ; to utter such wisdom in verse was not Shelley's province. But there is another wisdom which the world sometimes counts as folly — that which consists in devotion at all hazards to an ideal, to what stands with us for highest truth, sacred justice, purest love. And assuredly the tendency of Shelley's poetry, however we may venerate ideals other than his, is to quicken the sense thi,t there is such an exalted wisdom as this, and to stimulate us to its pursuit. Whether we speak of the poet as an inspirer of wis- u 9 8 Transcripts and Studies. dom, or as one who enlarges and purifies our feelings, or as one who widens the scope of our imagination, we dare not claim for him the title of a great poet unless he has enriched human life and aided men in some way to be- come better or less incomplete and fragmentary crea- tures. If Shelley has done this, we may disregard such words as those of Mr Euskin and Principal Shairp. Let us ask then, " How has Shelley made life better for each of us ? " bearing in mind, while we put the question, that only a small part of the full and true answer can find its way into a definite statement. At least we can say this, he helps us to conceive more nobly of nature and more nobly of man. We come through his poetry to feel more vividly the quick influencings which pass from the beauty and splendour and terror of the external world into these spirits of ours. He helps us to lie more open to the joy and sadness of the earth and skies. Who has felt the breath of the autumnal west wind without a sense of its large life and strength and purity, made ampler and more vivid by what Shelley's great ode has contributed to his imagination? Or who has heard the song of the lark in mid-heaven, and not felt how that atom of intense joy above us rebukes our dis- trust of nature and of life and all our dull despondencies, and feeling this has not remembered that Shelley once helped to interpret for him the rapture of the bird % And though no words of man ca.n make more glorious the spectacle of the midnight heavens, who does not feel in such stanzas as those which begin with the lines — " Palaoe-roof of cloudless nights, Paradise of golden lights Deep, immeasurable, vast," Last Words on Shelley. 99 a clarion-cry rousing the imagination and inspiring it with &,an for that advance which is needful before we can apprehend the splendour and the awful beauty that encircle us ? So Shelley has helped us to feel the glory of external nature, making life a better thing for each of us ; and in like manner he quickens within us a sense of the pos- sibilities of greatness and goodness hidden in man and woman. Let us recognise to the full the philosophical errors in the doctrine which lies behind the poetry of the "Prometheus Unbound," the false conception of evil as residing in external powers rather than in man's heart and will, the false ideal of the human society of the future ; and recognising these, let us acknowledge that the poem has helped us to conceive more truly and more nobly of the possibilities of man's life, its possibilities of fortitude, endurance, pitying sympathy, heroic martyrdom, aspiration, joy, freedom, love. No poet has more truly conceived, or more vividly presented in words a sense of the measureless importance of one human spirit to another — of the master to the disciple, of the spiritual leader to his followers, of man to woman and woman to man. With a quickened sense of the infinite signifi- cance of the relations possible with our fellows, our entire feeling for life and for the virtues which hide in it, more marvellous than the occult virtues of gems, is purified and exalted. Especially has Shelley taught us to recognise the blessedness — blessedness in joy or in anguish — of the higher rule imposed on dedicated spirits, who live for a cause or an idea, a charity or a hope, and for its sake are willing to endure shame and reproach. lOO Transcripts and Studies. and a death of martyrdom. But this higher rule, as conceived bj' Shelley, is not one of voluntary self-morti- fication or ignoble asceticism ; he does honour in verse and prose to music, sculpture, painting, poetry, and quickens our sense of the spiritual power of each. Yet he never settles down to browse with Epicurean satis- faction in any paddock of beauty or pleasure. We are touched through his poetry with a certain divine discon- tent, so that not music, nor sculpture, nor picture, nor song, can wholly satisfy our spirits ; but in and through these we reach after some higher beauty, some divine goodness, which we may not attain, yet towards which we must perpetually aspire. And who has heartened us more than Shelley, amid all his errors, to love freedom, to hope all things, to endure all things, and even while the gloom gathers to have faith in the dawn of light ? Who has done more to quicken and refine our sympathy with suffering creatures ? to assure us that among the despised and rejected things of the world true goodness dwells, so that even the snake may be in truth a defeated angel in disguise ? And who has more powerfully impressed us with the conviction that revenge and reprisals are bitter fruits of the spirit of wrath and pride, and that evil can best be overcome by returning good for evil \ From whom do we learn more effectively the duty of loyalty to our convictions, and the duty, imposed upon us at times, to fling out our highest belief as a factor to do its work in the world ? And if Shelley rouses within us the spirit that makes us nonconformist (and I, for my part, have a deep reverence for reasonable nonconformity), who has given us a more graceful Last Words on Shelley. loi example than he, in his happier moments, of that rare thing, a nonconformist who is not sour-faced but amiable and gentle ? But in many respects the truth seen by Shelley was seen as broken lights in an imperfect vision. His ideals were in part false ideals. He never quite escaped from the individualism of Godwin's system of thought. When we say, then, that Shelley possessed the wisdom of devotion to the ideal, we must qualify the statement by adding that his so-called ideal was in part no true ideal, but the spurious ideal of a phantast. For what is the good of using the splendid words "truth," "justice," "charity," if the words are used to describe something other than the realities they ought to stand for 1 These exalted words are wrested in revolutionary times away from their honest sense ; they are made a specious veil behind which acts of injustice and cruelty are freely per- petrated. I do not believe that Shelley could ever have been guilty of such acts ; but it is the Girondin with his fine phrases who prepares the way for the Jacobin with his atrocious deeds. Shelley's notion, expressed in the " Prometheus Unbound," that naked manhood, " Equal, uuclassed, tribeless, and nationless," will remain, when all has been Stripped off which humanity has painfully acquired during , the ages, is the pseudo-ideal of a Rousseau turned topsy-turvy, or rather of a Rousseau who has turned right-about face, and who sees the fantastic golden age of simplicity, innocence, and freedom not in the past but in the future. Here, however, I would insist on an important fact, I02 Transcripts and Studies. ■whicli has never received due attention from the students of Shelley's writings, and which goes far towards estab- lishing his sanity as a thinker, although it indicates a weakness in his poetry. While in such poems as " The Revolt of Islam " and " Prometheus Unbound," he has imagined an ideal of the future state of society which never can be realised and which we ought not to desire, in his prose writings he often exhibits a justness of view and a moderation which have hardly obtained the recog- nition they deserve. The contrast between his dreams and visions as a poet, and his very moderate expectations as a practical reformer, is indeed remarkable. " Before the restraints of government are lessened, it is fit that we should lessen the necessity for them," so wrote Shelley in his " Address to the Irish People," and boy as he was, he showed himself by such words to be wiser or honester than some grey-haired counsellors of to-day. " With respect to Universal Suffrage," he wrote, " I confess I consider its adoption in the present unprepared state of public knowledge and feeling a measure fraught with peril." And again, to Leigh Hunt : " The great thing to do is to hold the balance between popular impatience and tyrannical obstinacy. ... I am one of those whom nothing will satisfy, but who are ready to be partially satisfied in all that is practicable." Examples of Shelley's moderation in practical politics could be drawn from every period of his life, evidencing that this was the habit of his mind. His poetry is often vaporous and unreal, although the man himself had a clear perception of reality. Unfortunately the two sides of his mind — the Last Words on Shelley. 103 poetical and the practical — seldom worked together. In his verse he set forth his ideals and his visions of the remote future ; he reserved his prose for dealing with what was practicable and near. It would have been better for his poetry if he could have put his whole mind into verse, as did Wordsworth. We could readily excuse a prosaic paragraph for the sake of the gain in wisdom and intellectual and moral breadth. And in truth this would, in some degree, have saved his poetry from what is most prosaic in the longer pieces, that doctrinaire background of Godwinian abstractions to which nothing will give reality or life. In one, and only one, of Shelley's longer non-dramatic poems do the two sides of his mind work harmoniously together, in " The Mask of Anarchy." Although this poem may not rank with his highest work, it enables us to under- stand how greatly that work would have gained had it been possible for the Shelley who saw visions to have taken counsel with the Shelley who observed and medi- tated on affairs. But, as he conceived, his ideals of a remote future were not without a practical use for the toilers of the day and hour. We work among petty details in a larger, wiser spirit, and with more of hope and valour and patience, if now and again we lift our eyes and behold the land that is very far off. " We derive tranquillity, and courage, and grandeur of soul," he writes, " from contemplating an object which is because we will it, and may be because we hope and desire it, and must be if succeeding generations of the enlightened, sincerely and earnestly seek it." In what has been said I have had Shelley's larger 1 04 Transcripts and Studies. works chiefly in view. In his later poetry the doctrin- aire element almost passes out of sight. To his finest lyrical poems, the offspring of his later years and written in Italy, the description of Mr Mill, so untrue of "The Revolt of Islam" or "Queen Mab," really applies — they are pure renderings of states of feeling, without any intellectual centres. And the feeling most frequently and most vividly expressed is that of desire in some one or other of its forms. He is, as Mr Hutton has said in his fine study of Shelley's poetical mysticism, " the hoTdo desiderioruTn ; always thirsty, always yearning ; never pouring forth the strains of a thankful satisfaction, but either the cravings of an expected rapture or the agony of a severed nerve. . , . He cannot be satisfied without a thrill of his whole soul. He knows nothing of serene joy." Longing for the unattained or the unattainable and regret for what is passing away or lost — these feelings have rarely been expressed in verse with such delicacy and such intensity by any other poet. This has been admitted by all intelligent readers, and has been said again and again by the critics of Shelley. But it has not been sufficiently felt or perceived that over against this flux of emotion, and as if to counterpoise it, Shelley sets an ideal of faith in ideas, fortitude in adversity, stoical self-sufficiency, and mastery of the impulses of pain if not of pleasure. From his own lyrical temperament, responding to every incitement of feeling as an .^Eolian lyre responds to every wave of air, he seeks a refuge in the thought of heroic self-possession. Thus, in his early verses " On Death " :— Last Words on Shelley. 105 " O man ! hold thee on in courage of soul Through the stormy shades of thy worldly way ; And the billows of cloud that around thee roll Shall sleep in the light of a wondrous day." And in the later sonnet on " Political Greatness " : — " Man, who man would be, Must rule the empire of himself ; in it Must be supreme, establishing his throne On vanquished will, quelling the anarchy Of hopes and fears, being himself alone." No one is more sensible to the thrill of joy or pain than Shelley's Prometheus, who yet is unvanquishable in his fortitude. When Laon, who has known all exquisite raptures of love and joy, is hurried by a raging multitude to the stake, he has even transcended the need of resolution, for the light of faith and love which shines upon a martyr illumines his heart and his countenance : — " His cheek Resolve has not turned pale ; his eyes are mild And calm, and, like the morn about to break, Smile on mankind ; his heart seems reconciled To all things and itself, like a reposing child." And it is with tranquil self-possession (rendered more lovely by one touch of poignant self-pity) that Beatrice Cenci advances to her death : — " Give yourself no unnecesi3ary pain. My dear Lord Cardinal. Here, mother, tie My girdle for me, and bind up this hair In any simple knot ; ay, that does well. And yours, I see, is coming down. How often Have we done this for one another ; now We shall not do it any more. My Lord, We are quite ready. Well, 'tis very well." io6 Transcripts and Studies. Shelley's poetry, says Mr Hutton, is " the poetry of desire." Yes, but here is something to go along with desire and be its counterpoise. Tt is, however, fortitude in the presence of pain, and the constancy of a self-sufficing heroic soul in the midst of vicissitude which Shelley honours rather than temper- ance in the acceptance of delights. Of temperance we find little in his verse. He is always pining for a joy that is gone, or hungering for a rapture that is to come. Only in the last fragment written by Shelley, the ad- mirable " Triumph of Life," does he appear fully to recognise the danger of yielding the heart intemperately to even the purest passion. In that poem Rousseau and Plato appear as victims of their own hearts : Rous- seau, a ruin of manhood ; Plato, who had loved more nobly, punished less cruelly, yet a captive to the tri- umphal car ; both suffering the inevitable doom of those who are intemperate in desire and delight. But Socrates, who had known himself and tempered his heart to its object, is no chained victim in that wild career of Life the Triumpher. Thus, through desire Shelley was reach- ing to a calmer and saner atmosphere as his life drew towards a close. And perhaps the influence of his lyrical poems upon his readers may be to lift them towards a like calm of mind attained through passion, or at least to purify desire and delight from all grossness, and so to lighten the task of self-control. Aristotle, in a famous passage, speaks of the effect of tragedy in purifying through terror and pity the like passions. In a similar manner the lyrical poetry of delight and desire should purify Last Words on Shelley. 107 delight and desire. From the gross throng of conflict- ing passions the finer are selected by the poet, are given predominance, and are themselves raised to their highest and fairest life. It is the imagination which elevates the gross passion of grief and terror caused by death into the lofty sorrow which is the most human as well as the highest grief, with all of the brute purged away. It is the imagination which elevates the passion of love between man and woman into its nobler forms, where the senses have been taken up into the spirit. So every emotion of pleasure or of pain may be made rarer, finer, more exquisite by the energy of the imagination, and to effect this is one of the ^highest functions of lyrical poetry. The poet feels more exquisitely than other men, and receives more impulses and intimations from the spiritual side of things. When he sings he not only relieves his own heart, he not only widens our sympathy with human emotion ; he chastens and purifies our feel- ings, rendering them finer and more sane and permanent. The lyrical poetry of Shelley plays thus upon our feel- ings of delight — delight in external nature, delight in human beauty, delight in art, delight in the beauty of character and action ; it plays with its refining influence still more often upon our feeling^ of desire and of re- gret. There is a rapture at once calm and impassioned which is admirably expressed in Wordsworth's earlier poetry, a rapture of which Shelley knew little. He does not train us to sober certainties of waking bliss as does Wordsworth. He is in endless pursuit of unattain- able ideals, ever at the heels of the flying perfect. Al- though the man is poor indeed who has not something 1 o8 Transcripts and Studies. of Wordsworth's art of sinking profoundly into the joy and peace of things, and drinking a portion of their strength and repose, I am not sure that the fittest atti- tude of a human creature in this our mortal life is not Shelley's attitude — the attitude of aspiration and desire. Joy is not a thing for us to rest in ; joy should rather open into higher joy, light should pass into purer light ; from any height or deep at which we may arrive we should still cry, " altitude ?" to the height or deep beyond. To intensify and to purify desire is, perhaps, no less important for us than to deepen and purify satis- faction. And no one can live for a time in the lyrical poetry of Shelley without an exaltation and purification of desire. " I can conceive Shelley if he had lived to the pre- sent time," wrote Peacock, " passing his days like Volney, looking on the world from his windows without taking part in its turmoils ; and perhaps like the same or some other great apostle of liberty (for I cannot at this mo- ment verify the quotation), desiring that nothing should be inscribed on his tomb but his name, the dates of his birth and death, and the single word DMllusionn^." But it is he who would lie down and rest in some earthly satisfaction who will be disillusioned, not he who forever passes from desire to delight and from delight to desire, with a foot upon the ladder whose top reaches to heaven. Even in respect to political affairs I do not think that Shelley would have looked forth from his window disil- lusioned. A series of great events would probably have engaged his interest and aroused his imaginative ardour: first, the liberation of Greece, then the emancipation of Last Words on Shelley, 109 Catholics in Ireland, then the French Revolution of 1830, then the Reform Bill of 1832 ; and in 1882 Shelley would have reached his fortieth year, and his character would have gained the enduring ardour of mid- manhood. But however this may have been, I cannot conceive Shelley insensible to hope, untouched by desire, incapable of new delights, possessing only the sorry wisdom of a man disillusioned. Rather, I think, he would have continued to live by admiration, hope, and love ; and as these were directed to worthier objects and yet more worthy, he would have ascended in dignity of being. la life and in literature there are three kinds of men to whom we give peculiar honour. The first are the crafts- men, who put true and exact work into all they offer to the world, and find their happiness in such faithful ser- vice. Such a craftsman has been described with affec- tionate reverence by George Eliot in her poem " Stradi- varius" : — " That plain, white-aproned man who stood at work, Patient and accurate, full fourscore years, Cherished his sight and touch by temperance ; And since keen sense is love of perfectness Made perfect violins, the needed paths For inspiration and high mastery." We do not reckon Shelley among the craftsmen. The second class is small in numbers ; we call these men conquerors, of whom, as seen in literature, the most eminent representatives in modern times have been Shakspere and Goethe. These are the masters of Kfe; and having known joy and anguish, and labour and pleasure, and the mysteries of love and death, of 1 1 o Transcripts and Studies. evil and of good, they attain at last a lofty serenity upon heights from which they gaze down, with an in- terest that has in it something of exalted pity, on the turmoil and strife helow. It is their part to bring into actual union, as far as our mortal life permits, what is real and what is ideal. They are at home in both worlds. Shakspere retires to Stratford, and enjoys the dignity and ease and happy activity of the life of an English country gentleman ; yet it was he who had wandered with Lear in the tempest, and meditated with Hamlet on the question of self - slaughter. Goethe, councillor to his noble master, the Grand - Duke of Weimar, in that house adorned with treasures of art and science, presides as an acknowledged chief over the intel- lectual life of a whole generation ; yet he had known the storm and stress, had interpreted the feverish heart of his age in " Werther," and all its spiritual doubts and desires and aspirations in his " Faust. " Such men may well be named conquerors, and Shelley was not one of these. But how shall we name the third class of men, who live for the ideal alone, and yet are betrayed into weakness and error, and deeds which demand an atonement of re- morse ; men who can never quite reconcile the two worlds in which we have our being, the world of mate- rial fact and the spiritual world above and beyond it ; who give themselves away for love or give themselves away for light, yet sometimes mistake bitter for sweet, and darkness for light ; children who stumble on the sharp stones and bruise their hands and feet, yet who can wing their way with angelic ease through spaces of the upper air. These are they whom we say the gods Last Words on Shelley. 1 1 1 love, and who seldom reach the fourscore years of Goethe's majestic old age. They are dearer perhaps than any others to the heart of humanity, for they symbolise in a pathetic way, both its weakness and its strength. We cannot class them with the exact and patient craftsmen ; they are ever half defeated and can have no claim to take their seats beside the conquerors. Let us name them lovers ; and if at any time they have wandered far astray, let us remember their errors with gentleness, because they have loved much. It is in this third class of those who serve mankind that Shelley has found a place. THE TEXT OF WORDSWORTH'S POEMS* The text of Wordsworth becomes a subject of study for reasons precisely opposite to those which apply to the text of Shelley. Writing in a white heat of inspiration, Shelley corrected and re-corrected with impetuous speed ; his critical instincts acted in and through his creative energy ; his workmanship is therefore exquisite, and every word is vital. But it is true that Shelley, caught up in the wind of his own flight, was borne past obstacles or borne over chasms which one advancing deliberately must have avoided or removed ; and it was not his cnstom to return again and again upon his own work, applying to the outcome of his mood of inspiration the criticism of a humbler mood of reflection. There * It is right to mention that this study was published before the foundation of the Wordsworth Society, and before the appearance of the first volume of the edition of Wordsworth's Poems, in which Professor Knight has attempted to exhibit the variations of the text. The following editions have been used in preparing these notes: — Lyrical Ballads, 1 vol., 1798 ; ditto, 2 vols., 1800 ; ditto, 1802 ; ditto, 1805 ; Poems, 2 vols., 1807 ; Excursion, 4to, 1814 ; White Doe, 1815; Poems, 2 vols., 1815; Thanksgiving Ode, &c., 1816; Peter Bell (2nd ed.), 1819 ; Waggoner, 1819; Excursion, 1820; Poems, 4 vols., 1820; River Duddon, &c., 1820; Memorials of a Tour on the Continent, 1822; Eccle- siastical Sketches, 1822 ; Poems, 5 vols., 1827 ; ditto, 4 vols., 1832 ; Yarrow Revisited, 1835 ; Sonnets, 1838 ; Poems chiefly of Early and Late Years, 1842; Poems, 6 vols., 1843; ditto, 6 vols., 1849; ditto, 1858 ; Earlier Poems (ed. Johnston), 1857. This last volume exhibits in notes the text of 1815. It may be observed that an earlier text is in some instances likely to be familiar to readers who have made use of other recent editions than those published by Moxon. The, Text of Wordsworth's Poems. 1 1 3 was no Shelley of forty, fifty, eighty years of age to re-survey his j'outhful self, to inherit the remains of a buried life, and to cherish and care for these as things which have a history. We get from Shelley no even- ing voluntaries of calm acquiescent happiness. To us his songs must for ever be " as are the arrows Of that silver sphere, Whose intense lamp narrows In the white dawn clear." And had Shelley lived, he would, in a large measure, have forgotten the past while reaching to things that are before. Already in early manhood he could speak scornfully of his boyish verse ; " Queen Mab," as far as his conscious feeling went, was less to him after a decade than was " The Borderers '' to Wordsworth after half a century. 1 Then again chance and the evil genius of printers played strange tricks with Shelley's text. Sometimes the printers were Italian, sometimes the poet in Italy despatched his manuscript to London, and saw no proofs, Hence an opening for critical conjecture and comment, by virtue of which Shelley, as has been said, is hardly less than " a classic new unearthed," while Wordsworth must remain deprived for ever of the distinction con- ferred by critical tournaments in which the champions of this or that restored reading do doughty deeds. In "Descriptive Sketches," as given in Wordsworth's Poems, 1815, we find the lines : — " Then the milk-thistle bade those herds demand Three mites a day the pail and welcome hand." " ' H 114 Transcripts and Studies. But criticism is spared its ingenuity of conjecture, for the poet had seen his proofs, and in the list of errata we are directed for " mites " to read " times.' In " The Brothers" (Lyrical Ballads, 1800), we read: — "A child is born or christen'd, a field plough'd, A daughter sent to service, a web spun, The old house-cloth is deck'd with a new face." Conservative critics would doubtless have found an essential point in the contrast between the new-spun web and the old house-cloth, and it might even have been ascertained from some venerable but obscure autho- rity, that the new-facing of old cloths was a well-known custom in Ennerdale. Nor is this reading deprived of Wordsworth's authority in any errata-list, for the mis- print escaped his notice. The needful emendation — easy to anticipate — is, however, supplied in a subsequent edition, where the new face is seen to belong not to a " cloth," but to a " clock." Such service — skilled and loving — as Mr W. M. Rossetti and Mr Buxton Forman have rendered to Shelley is, accordingly, uncalled for, and indeed impos- sible in the case of Wordsworth. The study of Words- worth's text is of interest not through any lack of superintendence on the poet's part, but because it received from him the studious superintendence of a lifetime. In place of our own conjectures we have the history of his changes of mood and mind. Wordsworth's mode of poetical creation was one which favoured a return upon his own work, and tempted him to revive former impressions and rehandle former themes. For his creative mood was itself a retiirn upon some moment The Text of Wordstuorth's Poems. 1 1 5 or season of involuntary rapture or vision. That moment or season had passed away — passed, it may have been, into the distance of years. But it had left in the soil of the poet's imagination a living germ. Then came a time of recollection, a time of quiet ; and by degrees the quiet was elevated (as we may say, using the words of mystical devotion) into illumination, union, and ecstasy. " Poetry," Wordsworth has written, " takes its origin from emotion recollected in tranquillity ; the emotion is contemplated till, by a species of reaction, the tranquil- lity gradually disappears, and an emotion, kindred to that which was before the subject of contemplation, is gradually produced, and does itself actually exist in the mind." And as in the original act or process of creation the poet returned upon a past feeling, recollecting it in tranquillity, so after his imagihation had shaped this into a poem, he would return upon it again and again, he would listen to the voice of his own song, coming to him now echo-wise, until it seemed to him that he could indeed " beget That golden time again.'' And then would begin the work of refashioning what he had made. It was not always, however, that the revival of the departed mood was true and complete, and thus at times a lower, more critical, less creative temper would cloud the original inspiration. Useful employment there was for critical sagacity, for judgment, in the revision by "Wordsworth of his own poems ; but not seldom he applied with disastrous effect a logic of good sense to works which ought to submit themselves 1 1 6 Transcripts and Studies. only to a logic of the emotions. In some cases he sub- sequently perceived that in following his later thoughts he had yielded to unwise counsellors, and he returned to his first thought and hie first phrase. In others, the wandering from the primary intention once begun, he would wander still farther and farther astray. We must also, in noting rehandlings of his text, bear in mind the great transformation which his character underwent, that transformation of the youth moving in the glory and the freshness of a dream into the man advancing with firm foot under the light of common day. At first in Wordsworth's poetry there is on the one hand a matter-of-factness (as Coleridge called it) most definite, most literal ; and over against this there is the vision, the glory, the divine illumination. These are not opposed one to the other, but they stand apart. Gradu- ally they approach and blend ; and each submits to the influence of the other. The skyey splendours take a sober colouring ; the things of use and wont become more precious because more habitually informed with what is spiritual. It has been matter of reproach against Wordsworth that he did not always remain what he was in the period of early manhood. " Wide apart," one has said, " as lay their lines of work, it is true alike of Shelley and Keats, that for them it was not fated, nor could it ever have been possible, to outlive ' the hour Of splendour in the grass, of glory in the flower ;' nor could Byron, while retaining as did Wordsworth the freshness and the force of his genius, have outlived his more fiery delight in the triumphant life of sea and cloud and The Text of Wordsworth! s Poems. 1 1 7 storm." It may be so, for Keats as a poet fled from the dissonances of real life, and Byron, feeling their pre- sence, declared with bitter laughter that they, must remain, and that man is always glorious and contempt- ible, majestic and mean ; and Shelley dreamed indeed of a divine new creation of the universe by love, when the Titan should be free ; but for the present to his eyes all is a strife between evil and good, and the martyr's fortitude and faith reveal the only harbourage from despair possible to heroic souls. But Wordsworth made a real attempt, now and here, for his own needs and those of others to accept all the elementary facts of life, and to resolve into a spiritual harmony the dis- sonances of this our world. The harmony was not wholly joyous and triumphant ; a still sad music made a portion of the strain : it certainly was not meant for any Mssnad dance, nor for the horns and cymbals of any company of Corybantes ; but perhaps it was a harmony on the whole as much in keeping with our condition as any that has since been offered to our hearing. It will be well to begin these fragmentary notes with mention of a few poems which have wholly disappeared from the later editions. No wrong is done to Words- worth by calling attention to them. Although these poems, for reasons which appeared sufficient to their writer, are refused a place among the remains handed down to posterity, there is no ground for supposing that he regretted their appearance, or that he would be ill pleased if any person who had a care for his work should find them where they stand. The most trivial in substance is, with one exception, 1 1 8 Transcripts and Studies. the earliest in date.* In the second edition of "Lyrical Ballads" appeared a poem of seven stanzas, entitled "Andrew Jones." It reappears fifteen years later in the collected "Poems" of 1815, where it is placed with some appropriateness by the side of " Simon Lee." The pathetic outwelHng of gratitude from the worn-out, little, old huntsman of Cardiganshire, — gratitude for a trivial service, — stands as a token or sign of the oppressive load borne everywhere by helpless age. "Andrew Jones" is a kind of companion picture, in which the misery is unrelieved by anything except by a frank escape of indignation in the first and last stanzas : — " I hate that Andrew Jones ; he'll breed His children up to waste and pillage : I wish the press-gang or the drum "Would, with its rattling music, comet And sweep him from the village." The most ardent lover of Wordsworth cannot shed many tears for the departed Andrew Jones, a village scoundrel the dastardliness of whose crime alone gives him fame ; yet we could have better spared some " Poems of the * I pass over " The Convict," a poem of thirteen stanzas, printed only in Lyrical Ballads, 1798. Its early omission implies Words- worth's consciousness that it was unworthy of him. The verses indeed are so little characteristic that they might have been written by Hayley. The poet descends from the " slope of a mountain " to peer through a glimmering grate at the convict ; the concluding verse may satisfy the reader : — " At thy name though compassion her nature resign, Though in virtue's proud mouth thy report be a stain. My care, if the arm of the mighty were mine, Would plant thee where yet thou might'st blossom again. " If one cared to make a comment on a poem so insignificant, it might be contrasted with the " Sonnets on the Punishment of Death." t " With its tantara sound would come." 1800. The Text of Wordsworth's Poems. 1 1 9 Fancy" or some "Ecclesiastical Sonnets." Its dry pathos, its bald recognition of misery, and its welling of pity out of the hard rock of pain, are characteristic of a fragment of Wordsworth's genius. Some passing horse- man has thrown a penny to a travelling cripple and has ridden on ; the " poor crawling helpless wretch " cannot stoop to pick the halfpence up, and no aid is at hand : — " Inch-thick the dust lay on the ground, For it had long been drouthy weather : So with his staff the cripple wrought Among the dust, till he had brought The halfpennies together.'' A more prosaically piteous figure than that of the leech- gatherer stirring with his staff the pond and gazing into the muddy water. At the moment Andrew, the village tippler, passes : — " He stooped and took the penny up : And when the cripple nearer drew, Quoth Andrew, ' Under half-a-Crown, What a man finds is all his own; And so, my friend, good-day to you.' " We hear no imprecations from the victim ; we do not see him shaking his staff at the retreating Andrew; thanks and praises ran fast out of the heart of Simon Lee for one small act of service ; we do not know that the cripple felt even surprise. The two small volumes of " Poems " published in 1807 are somewhat more difficult to procure than the " Lyrical Ballads," and are known to comparatively few readers of Wordsworth. The first of these volumes contains a poem the disappearance of which is certainly 120 Transcripts and Studies. to be regretted ; nor is it easy to divine the motive for its exclusion from the later editions. The verses are of peculiar interest as belonging to that little group of poems which record the dearness to one lover and the death of Lucy ; they are one in spirit with others of the group ; we remember the rider, the cottage, the orchard plot ; we know the " fond and wayward thoughts '' which slide into a lover's head.* The poet's gift to surprise his Lucy, and to delight her eyes, is not of diamond or gold ; such would but trouble the rustic simplicity of her way of life ; his gift is the beauty of a little living lamp amid the grass. " I have made a discovery," Landor wrote from Wales, " which is that there are both nightin- gales and glow-worms in my valley. I would give two or three thousand pounds less for a place that was without them." The little poem may be presented as a whole : — " Among all lovely things my Love had been ; Had noted well the stars, all flowers that grew About her home ; but she had never seen A Glow-worm, never one, and this I knew. " While riding near her home one stormy night, A single Glow-worm did I chance to espy ; I g:i.ve a fervent welcome to the sight, And from my horse I leapt ; great joy had I. " Upon a leaf the Glow-worm did I lay, To bear it with me through the stormy night : And, as before, it shone without dismay ; Albeit putting forth a fainter light. * But though thus transformed into a, lover's poem, the verses record an incident of 1795, in which the poet's sister Dorothy, and not the imagined Lucy, had a part. The Text of Wordsworth's Poems. 1 2 1 ' When to the dwelling of my Love I came, I went into the Orchard quietly; And left the Glow-worm, blessing it by name, Laid safely by itself beneath a Tree. " The whole next day, I hoped, and hoped with fear ; At night the Glow-worm shone beneath the Tree : I led my Lucy to the spot — ' Look here ! ' Oh ! joy it was for her, and joy for me." It will not be out of place to notice here an episode appearing in the first (1814) and second (1820) editions of " The Excursion," but which, as far as I am aware, has not appeared during half a century in any authorised text. The whole of that great poem underwent minute revision ; lines were omitted, lines were inserted, lines were altered.* A notice of the more significant changes would not be without interest, but here it is forbidden by the limits of this article. In connection with the omitted episode, one alteration aifecting the chief charac- ter must be mentioned. The Wanderer, that flower of pedlars, younger brother of Autolycus, "like, but oh how different ! " had in 1814 (and such was still his fate in 1820) the misfortune to lose his father, and had again the compensating good fortune to gain, by his mother's second marriage, a stepfather, to whose care he owed his scholarship, and some of his moral and spiritual wisdom. " Ere he had outgrown his infant days His widowed Mother for a secoiid Mate Espoused the Teacher of the Village School, Who on her offspring zealously bestowed Needful instruction." * One insertion is, I believe, generally known as such — that of certain lines towards the close of Book I., in which the Wanderer asserts the power not alone of meditative wisdom, but of Christian faith, to soothe and elevate suffering. This was one of the latest alterations of the text, appearing for the first time in 1845. 12 2 Transcripts and Studies. In 1827 there was no toleration for the race of step- fathers ; the village schoolmaster is dismissed, disappear- ing to bestow needful instruction we know not where, and the Wanderer's deceased father is resuscitated; Now towards the close of the sixth book a blameless stepmother is in like manner utterly abolished and destroyed. She, indeed, is not guilty of Kving, but she lias lived, and her more immediate crime is that of occupying a place by her husband's side under the sods of the churchyard among the mountains. The moun- tains reject from among them her little hillock of earth. The Pastor has told the story of Wilfred Armathwaite, the causes and incidents of whose faithlessness to his marriage-vow are recorded with a fulness of detail in the earlier editions which is needed to point the moral, and which, in its wise gravity of statement, could not offend any save a diseased sensibility. The story is told of the faithful widower remaining unwedded in the midst of his budding and blooming girls. And then the chronicler turns to three ridges in the churchyard which lie side by side : " One Hillock, ye may note, is small and low, Sunk almost to a level with the plain By weight of time ; the others, undepressed. Are bold and swelling." Midmost lies the husband, who in the noon of manhood had laid in this earth his wife. Left alone with his many little ones, he has had to encounter an added sorrow in poverty, and the threatened loss of his paternal fields. " The dews Of night and morn that wet the mountain sides, The Text of Wordsworth s Poems. 123 The bright stars twinkling on their dusky tops, "Were conscious of the pain that drove him forth From his own door, he knew not when — to range He knew not where ; distracted was his brain. His heart was cloven ; and full oft he prayed. In blind despair, that God would take them all." But relief from want and fear — a gleam of liglit from the bosom of the cloud — comes suddenly, and in that renewal of life and energy, " The desolate Father raised his head and looked On the wide world in hope." Before very long, "a virtuous woman of grave years, and of prudential habits," undertakes " the sacred office of a wife " to him and of a mother to his children. To all she is kind and good, only failing in some partial fondness for the babe " whose heart had known no mother but herself." By industry, and with the aid of her " prudential habits," the land is at last redeemed, and passes to the eldest son of the lost young wife. Every trace of this story has disappeared from " The Excursion." We pass now to a volume published in 1 838 to satisfy the demand of some of Wordsworth's friends, who wished to see all the sonnets, hitherto scattered through the several divisions of his poems, brought under the eye at once. Two sonnets, one on the Ballot, and one on Copyright, written in the year of this volume's publica- tion, have not been retained in the later editions of their author's Complete Poetical Works. The Copyright son- net is the second of two treating of that theme. It takes the form of an address from a poet to his grand- child, and the thought expressed in its fourteen lines is 124 Transcripts and Studies. that, unless authorship receive its just rewards, not alone rewards of fame and usefulness but of current coin, the descendants of the poet, sunk perhaps in poverty, may be unable to obtain the culture needful to feel or under- stand his simplest lay. " This feeling," wrote Words- worth in a note, " had been forced too often upon my own mind by remembering how few descendants of men eminent in literature are even known to exist." The " Protest against the Ballot" is of finer quality. Words- worth's alarm upon the eve of the Reform of 18.32 is known to all readers of his verse or of the letters in his " Memoirs." To Crabb Robinson he talked of leav- ing the country on account of the imminent ruin. The ten-pound householder, as we know, won his right to vote, and somehow England still survived. But a fur- ther horror lay ahead — the Radical Reformers clamoured for secret voting. What monster might not slyly lurk within the ballot-box ? " Forth rushed, from Envy sprung and Self-conceit, A Power misnamed the Spirit of Ebform, And through the astonished Island swept in storm, Threatening to lay all Orders at her feet That crossed her way. Now stoops she to entreat Licence to hide at intervals her head. Where she may work safe, undisquieted. In a close Box, covert for Justice meet. St George of England ! keep a watchful eye Eixed on the Suitor ; frustrate her request ; Stifle her hope ; for, if the State comply. From such Pandorian gift may come a Pest Worse than the Dragon that bowed low his crest, Pierced by thy spear in glorious victory." The second sonnet on the Ballot, that ending with the line " Hurrah for , hugging his Ballot-box," The Text of Wordsworth! s Poems. 125 was originally relegated to a place among the notes. The reason for its exclusion from the general collection, assigned in a note which has since disappeared, is not without interest. "In no part of my writings have I mentioned the name of any cotemporary, that of Buonaparte only excepted, but for the purpose of eulogy ; and therefore, as in the concluding verse of what follows there is a deviation from this rule (for the blank will be easily filled up), I have excluded the sonnet from the body of the collection, and placed it here as a public record of my detestation, both as a man and a citizen, of the proposed contrivance." The blank was probably meant to be filled with the name of Grote.* Wordsworth's habit of rehandling his poems was of early origin. Already in 1800 some changes are intro- duced into the "Lyrical Ballads" of 1798. They are, however, neither numerous nor important.! The altera- tions effected in 1802 in the poems which had appeared two years previously are considerable, and from that date until shortly before his death Wordsworth never ceased to touch and retouch his writings. Probably * It is perhaps worth mentioning in a note, that among the " Even- ing Voluntaries " of the volume " Yarrow Revisited, and other Poems " (1835) is included a cento made up of a stanza of Akenside, connected with a stanza from Beattie by a couplet of Thomson. " This practice," Wordsworth writes, " in which the author sometimes indulges, of linking together, in his own mind, favourite passages from different authors, seems in itself unobjectionable ; " and he hopes that this spe- cimen may "open to others a harmless source of private gratification.'' t The only poem much affected by these alterations is " Lines left upon a Seat in a Yew-tree ; " but touches will be found in "Animal Tranquillity and Decay," "The Thorn," "The Female Vagrant," " Simon Lee," and "The Idiot Boy." The " Lines written in a Boat," and " Lines written near Richmond," formed one piece in 1798. On the suggestion of Coleridge the poem was divided into two. 126 Transcripts and Studies. some of the newer readings never had the entire ap- proval of the poet, but were concessions to the scruples of a weak-minded public. " In policy," he said, when dictating his notes to Miss Fenwick, " I excluded ' Atlice Fell' from many editions of my Poems." And it is confessed in a note to " The Waggoner " that, from unwillingness to startle the reader at the outset by so bold a mode of expression, the lines descriptive of the night-hawk's note, " The Night-hawk is singing his frog-like tune, Twirling his watchman's rattle about," were altered before publication. But for the most part the changes of text serve as materials for a true history of Wordsworth's feelings and opinions with reference to his art. In the critical manifestoes prefixed to the first and second editioas of " Lyrical Ballads," two motives for those poems — spoken of in the preface as " experi- ments" — are insisted on : first, to ascertain how far " the language of conversation in the middle and lower classes of society" (Preface, 1798), or, as he puts it differently two years later, how far "a selection of the real language of men in a state of vivid sensation " (Preface, 1800), is adapted to the purposes of poetic pleasure; secondly (a motive first indicated in 1800), " to make the incidents of common life interesting by tracing in them, truly though not ostentatiously, the primary laws of our nature."* Each poem, we are * It may here be noted that the celebrated " Preface of 1800," as it appears in later editions, differs in many and important particulars from the Preface as actually printed in that year. The changes are effected in all ways, by omission, addition, and substitutions. The Text of Wordsworth! s Poems. 127 told, has a purpose, and in his Preface, in a passage since omitted, Wordsworth goes from piece to piece through a series of poems, stating in brief the psycho- logical significance of each. Now these two motives carried with them two temptations : one was the temp- tation to literality, matter-of-factness, trivial or acciden- tal detail, and over-familiar phraseology ; the other was the temptation to excessive self-consciousness, to a fatuous caressing of the moral or psychological motive of the poem, or to a kind of turning inside-out of the poem's inward parts. " Here," we can sometimes imagine the writer saying to us through his verses, " I am illustrating the laws of association of ideas ; here I am subtly treating of the maternal passion." And thus in a second way arose a tendency to attach importance, sometimes undue importance, to the trivial, its connec- tion with some one of " the primary laws of our nature" conferring dignity on what would otherwise be mean or merely accidental. Wordsworth never receded from his principles, but he perceived that they had occasionally been abused by himself, and he was not unwilling to make reparation for his misdeeds. In the second volume of 1807 some short pieces are placed under the heading "Moods of my own Mind ; " these pieces were at a later time dis- tributed under the classes, founded on the psychological division adopted in 1815, and retained to the last. The little poem which describes a whirling and dancing of withered leaves under a hail shower, as though some Kobin Goodfellow were piping to them, closed originally 1802) with the petition: — 128 Transcripts and Studies. " Oh ! grant me, Heaven, a heart at ease. That I may never cease to find. Even in appearances like these, Enough to nourish and to stir my mind." Wordsworth's egoism is, so to speak, of an abstract kind : through the operation of his own mind he contemplates the universal laws. Still this egoism was inartistic, a Wordsworthian form of effusiveness ; and his severer instinct as a poet rightly banished such lines as the above.* The marvellous passage which closes the second book of " The Excursion," a bodying forth in words of the mystic pageantry of storm-clouds transmuted by the sun, is introduced as originally written, with an apology. Speech cannot express such glories, too bright and fair even for remembrance, " Yet the attempt may give Collateral interest to this homely Tale.'' We are now happily spared this apology. Unhappily other sins of Wordsworth knew no repentance. In the same spirit by which the poem of the Leech-gatherer was named " Resolution and Independence," Derwent Cole- ridge remarked, the " Old Cumberland Beggar" might have been changed into "Advantages of Mendicancy." We have still to suffer a twinge at sight of the turning inside-out of the poem originally named " Old Man Travelling," by its later title, " Animal Tranquillity and Decay. " t * Compare the verse omitted from the poem beginning, "Let other bards of angels sing." t In Lyrical Bards, 1798, this formed a second and subordinate title. This poem originally ended with the old man's answer to an inquiry as to the object' of his journey. He travels to see his son who is dying (lying, 1800) in an hospital at Falmouth, whither he has been brought after a sea-fight. The Text of Wordsworth! s Poems. 129 Wordsworth's omissions made for sake of avoiding the merely trivial, literal, matter-of-fact, accidental, or gro- tesque, are numerous, and some of these are sufficiently well known. Simon Lee during two-and-twenty years stood before the reader in that " long blue livery coat " " That's fair behind, and fair before," and which is only faintly referred to after 1815 ; during several years more he remained bereft of his right eye ; finally the eye was restored to him, but the lustre of his livery was dimmed. If Wordsworth had a tender con- sideration for weaker brethren who might read " The Waggoner," it can hardly be said that he was as con- siderate towards the readers of "Peter Bell." That characteristic and highly interesting piece belongs essen- tially to the period of the first " Lyrical Ballads," but its author, as Cottle tells us, objected to publishing it in any other form than as a separate poem, and hence it was held over. After having in manuscript almost " survived its majority," as a separate poem it appeared. During the long interval pains were taken " at different times to make the production less unworthy of a favourable recep- tion." We know of what nature that reception was. Wordsworth again set to work and revised the poem throughout. In 1819 lihe opening stanza of Part the First runs as follows : — " All by the moonlight river-side It gave three miserable groans ; ' 'Tis come then to a pretty pass,' Said Peter to the groaning Ass, ' But I will hang your bones.' " And again, in a later stanza, there is a second bone- I 130 Transcripts and Studies. banging. Already in the following year this had been erased. And that verse prefixed as a motto to his " Peter Bell the Third " by Shelley, — that verse descrip- tive of a possible vision of prosaic horror below the water into which the Potter is staring, — " Is it a party in a parlour. Crammed just as they on earth were crammed, Some sipping punch — some sipping tea. But as you by their faces see, All silent and all — damned ? " — that verse, which is no invention of " Miching Mallecho, Esq.," disappeared hastily, and disappeared so effectually that its existence at any time in Wordsworth's poem has been denied. " The Idiot Boy," written with speed and in a most gleeful mood, was always a favourite with its author. Yet, — -perhaps for the hardness of our hearts, — he made a sacrifice of some passages not out of keeping with the rest : — " Beneath the moon that shines so bright, Till she is tired, let Betty Foy With girt and s&cryxp fiddle-faddle, But wherefore set upon a saddle. Him whom she loves, her Idiot Boy ? " This verse held its ground until 1827. Any reader who can love Betty Foy, and Susan Gale, and Johnny, and the wise Pony, will find no difficulty in receiving the verse. The anxious mother's fiddle-faddling is a gnat at which no person of a pharynx capacious enough for Johnny and the Pony need strain. Let Betty fiddle- faddle till she is tired ; let Susan or the Pony wince, our withers are unwrung. Some of the dropped lines and stanzas of Words- The Text of Wordsworth's Poems. 131 worth's earlier poems are worth recalling to mind ; the loss of some is to be seriously regretted. It is not without interest, in connection with the history of the poet's opinions, to note that passage in the earliest- published fragment of " Guilt and Sorrow " which tells of the ruin of the old honest father dispossessed of his little patrimony by a covetous lord of land ; nor that passage which paints in words so vivid the horrors of strife and carnage ; nor, again, that passage in which Wordsworth, who has been charged with the guilt of ingrained respectability, turns with a- natural sympathy to the knavish wanderers who gave them- selves, with too small warrant, the honourable name and style of potters : — • " My heart is touched to think that men like these, The earth's rude tenants, were my first relief ; How kindly did they paint their vagrant ease ! And their long holiday that feared not grief, For all belonged to all, and each was chief. No plough their sinews strained ; on grating road No wain they drove, and yet, the yellow sheaf In every vale for their delight was stowed ; For them in nature's meads the milky udder ilowed." * A poet of our own day has put into the mouth of one of his imaginary characters, who is a slave to society, his confession of a yearning for vagabondage ; the heart of Elvire's husband " fires up for lawlessness ; " he yields for an hour to the charm of the truant life. The youth- ful Wordsworth felt a proneness of affection towards any- * Lyrical Ballads, 1798: "The Female Vagrant.'' This poem of Salisbury Plain, and the various fragments of it, published at various times, gave Wordsworth an infinity of "poetic pains." The version of 1802 differs considerably from that of 1798, and again from that of 1800. 132 Transcripts and Studies. thing which symbolized the life of unchartered freedom, even while his feet were advancing along paths which led him to the bondage and the liberty of duty. And here may be noticed a remarkable stanza which occurs in the noble " Ode to Duty " as first printed in the "Poems" of the year 1807. The poet has owned his weariness and his weakness ; he has lived as if life's business were a summer mood ; he has " shoved unwel- come tasks away ; " * but now he would serve Duty more strictly ; he longs for steadfast hopes, and for an enduring repose. And, as we now read the poem, he passes on directly to that sublime address to the " Stern Lawgiver" before whom flowers laugh, and through whom the most ancient heavens are fresh and strong. But w4io is this Duty, and how shall she be known ? This Duty is not law merely imposed from without ; it is law approved from within ; it is a free Will made wise. The omitted stanza — which precedes the address to the " Stern Lawgiver " — a stanza never reprinted since 1807, runs thus : — " Yet not the less would I throughout Still act according to the voice Of my own wish ; and feel past doubt That my submissiveness was choice : Not seeking in the school of pride Tor 'precepts over-dignified,' Denial and restraint I prize No farther than they breed a second Will more wise." I cannot but regret that Wordsworth, instead of remov- ing these lines, did not rather confer on them, as he well * The stanza containing these words has been altered, and muck improved. The Text of Wordsworth s Poems. ' 133 knew how, that full and heightened style which would have made them worthy to retain their place in the great poem of which they were once a part. The swan on Locarno's lake is known to all students of Wordsworth's poetry, but he does not now sail before the swan-like Dion. The reader must seek the beauti- ful creature in a jungle of notes. The removal of this opening stanza of Dion, after it had held its ground for twenty years, was not without warrant. Beautiful in itself, the passage lent no aid to the poem as a whole. But the majestic bird must not be permitted to hide himself from sight. He is an Italian cousin of that sole voyager on still Saint Mary's lake, sole save for his companioning shadow. There the green hills are mirrored in the unruffled water ; through her depths Saint Mary's Lake is visibly delighted. The swan of Locarno sails at night, and leaves behind him an illumined wake ; oaring along with a gushing impulse, he scatters the reflection of rock and wood, and has for his companion — companion shall we say or rival % — not his own shadow, but the queenly moon. There is another poem from which an exquisite stanza has been robbed ; this was one of Wordsworth's latest crimes, and one of his worst. From 1807, when the poem "Louisa" first appeared, until at least 1832, the lovely maid needed not to be apologised for, and with her quickened blood and breath she stood before us an English girl more lovely than Grecian nymph or naiad ; she is " ruddy, fleet, and strong." " And down the rocks can leap along Like rivulets in May." 134 Transcripts and Studies. Inspired by the Author of Evil, Wordsworth began to suspect that a young woman who could leap about the rocks in this fashion was hardly a person to be accepted in high society ; at all events why need she be blowsy ? " I confess," exclaimed Mrs Primrose, " I don't like to see my daughters trudging up to their pew all blowsed and red with walking, and looking for all the world as if they had been winners at a smock race." The poem opens in 1843 with the following nauseous words : — " Though by a sickly taste betrayed, Some will dispraise the lovely maid. With fearless pride I say That she is healthful, fleet, and strong." Wordsworth was saved from entire dishonour. By 1849 the original text had resumed its place, with the exception of the offensive epithet "ruddy." Louisa is now " nyraph-like." We grow elated to be spared the reference to " sickly taste " and the dispraise of Louisa by genteel persons. But suddenly a shock comes ; we stand in presence of irreparable wrong. A stanza, which had lived in the poem and illuminated it with fresh loveliness since 1807, is gone. Where are the spiritual smiles that rose and brightened and sank on Louisa's face? " And she has smiles to earth unknown, Smiles, that with motion of their own Do spread and sink and rise ; ■ That come and go with endless play, And ever as they pass away Are hidden in her eyes." * * Compare Shelley's " Smiles," which " Make the cold air fire — then atreen. them In those looks where whoso gazes. Faints entangled in their mazes." The Text of Wordsworth's Poems. ^oo They are gone. Was this ravage wrought in the same spirit in which Wordsworth, on his nutting expedition, rose and mutilated the nook of hazels ? * How and where to end a poem are questions which, puzzle at times the poet's will. If, indeed, the poet desires to lead you up to a point at which he will sud- denly spring a mine upon you, or discharge a rocket, or perform a sudden pirouette and so disappear in the glory of high art, the ending is of course prepared beforehand and written first. But Wordsworth did not work in this manner, and he had many searchings of heart as to whether the final impression left by his lines was pre- cisely what he intended that it should be. The last stanza of " The Complaint of a Forsaken Indian Woman " (1798) disappeared in 181.5 to be replaced long after. To " Foresight " a final stanza was added. The ending of " The Skylark," the poem beginning " Up with me ! up with me into the clouds ! " was altered and re-altered. The last stanza of the good-humoured trifle entitled "Rural Architecture" disappeared (1805) and again resumed its place (1820). t * Compare with the changes wrought in "Louisa" the lines which describe Lucy at that time when suddenly a fear of her death came with a pang into her lover's heart : " When she I loved was strong and gay, And like a rose in June," changed (by 1843) to— " When she I loved looked every day Fresh as a rose in June. " t " Some little I've seen of blind boisterous works By Christian disturbers more savage than Turks." The second line ran in 1800 — " In Paris and London, 'mong Christians or Turks." In 1827 the three rosy-cheeked schoolboys were not named, and the poem opened — " From the meadow of Armthwait on Thirl aiere's wild Shore." 136 Transcripts and Studies. In 1800 "Poor Susan" closed thus : — " Poor Outcast ! return — to receive thee once more The house of thy Father will open its door, And thou, once again in thy plain russet gown, May'st hear the thrush sing from a tree of its own.'' It was surely right to strike away this stanza (omitted, 1802) from the little poem whose unity of impression it only marred. Cheapside, the silent morning, the song of the caged bird, and the vision of a lost home, these are all that make up the present moment for poor Susan ; and in that moment the dream is already pass- ing away ; her return is not to a cottage in the dale, but to the London street : — " The stream will not flow, and the hill will not rise, And the colours have all passed away from her eyes." * Little need be said of additions made by Wordsworth to the original text of his poems, for these, speaking generally, remain, and are known to all his readers of the present day. It was seldom that Wordsworth, while holding to his original feeling or idea, added baser matter ; the added lines nearly always heighten and enrich the piece. When his vision grew troubled, when his hand slackened its grasp, when he lost faith in his * Before leaving the subject of dropped stanzas room may be found for a note on "The Danish Boy." That mysterious fragment originally (1800) possessed a stanza, which would probably have been retained had the poem been completed. It describes in the manner of " The Thorn," two green sods hard by a blasted tree, which neither sun, nor wind, nor rain, can bind together, but which lie as if just severed by the spade. In the editions of 1827 and 1832 a note informs the reader that a ballad was to have been written on the story of a Danish prince, who, flying from battle, was murdered by a cottager for sake of his valuables ; the house fell under a curse, and the valley ever after was haunted by the spirit of the youth. The Text of Wordsworth' s Poems. 137 former self, then he would begin to patch and piece in- congruous things together ; while working upon his original lines he was safe. A poem of small worth, " The Song of the Wandering Jew," is indeed lowered in value by the alloy of added verses ; but such a case is exceptional. There are lines in " Michael " which we could ill lose, telling how Luke, a ten-years boy, went with his father to the heights — " Why should Irelate That objects which the shepherd loved before Were dearer now 1 that from the Boy there came Feelings and emanations, things which were Light to the sun and music to the wind ; And that the Old Man's heart seemed born again ? " These lines were first inserted in the text of 1802. More questionable is the matter of gain or loss in the " Daffodils." When the flowers flash upon the inward eye, the poet's heart dances with the daffodils. In the poem as printed in 1807, at the first moment of be- holding them, he sees them not as "golden," but as " dancing " — " A host of dancing daflfodils Along the lake, beneath the trees, Ten thousand dancing in the breeze." The stanza beginning, " Continuous as the stars that shine And twinkle in the milky-way," an insertion of 1815, is not found in the original ver- sion, and for "jocund company" we there read "laugh- ing company." The whole poem is filled with the laughter and the dance of flowers and waves, and the 138 Transcripts and Studies. contrast between the quiet couch, with its pensive mood, and that involuntary aladriTix'^ ipavTasla of dancing blossoms, becomes the more impressive. Perhaps the stars in the milky-way twinkle, but assuredly they do not dance ; and yet for sake of the " tossing their heads " — ten thousand tossing their heads at once — we must accept the new stanza of 1815, and make no ungrateful comment.* In the case of " Daffodils," new lines have been intro- duced, and old lines have been altered. The same is true to a far greater extent of " Ruth." Indeed so per- plexingly have stanzas come in, and gone out, and changed places in the several versions of that poem, that it is im- possible here to present the facts in detail. It may be said in general terms that " Ruth " is found in four states — that of 1800, which is the least elaborated ; secondly, that of 1802, in which many alterations, which might be to the advantage of the poem if skilfully exe- cuted, are made in a bungling manner ; thirdly, that of 1815, which nearly reverts to the original form; and last, that of 1820, which resulted from all the sugges- tions of 1802 and 1805 having been again taken up, * In the edition of 1815, a note, worth quoting here, is appended to "Daflfodils." "The subject of these stanzas is rather an elementary f 3eling and simple impression (approaching to the nature of an ocular spectrum) upon the imaginative faculty, than an exertion of it. The one which follows [' Poor Susan '] is strictly a Reverie, and neither that nor the next after it in succession, ' The Power of Music,' would have been placed here except [to avoid a needless multiplication of the classes.]" May I offer in this modest corner a thought or a fancy which pleases me — that Wordsworth in placing side by side his ' ' Po wer of Music," and his " Star-Gazers, " looked on the poems as companions the one illustrating the gains of emotional excitation, when natural and pure ; the other, the barrenness of knowledge unvitalised by the emotions ? The Text of Wordsworth's Poems. 139 aud carried out by a thoroughly trained craftsman.* Nothing remained to be done except to add the last touch of perfection to a word or a line. The reasons which induced Wordsworth to displace an original reading and substitute a different one were of various kinds. Sometimes a line was metrically defective; it limped or floundered. If our eyes may be trusted, against the incredulous protest of our ears, the opening lines of "Personal Talk" were in 1807 — " I am not one who much or oft delight To season my fireside with personal talk About friends, who live within an easy walk." Of course a touch set the line right. Similarly the piece beginning with the words of Sydney, " With how sad steps, Moon, thou climb'st the sky," was by a little manipulation transformed from a poem of fifteen lines to a sonnet. i" Sometimes, again, it is an error as to some point of fact which Wordsworth desires to cor rect. The " broad green wave " that flashed images round Leonard as he sailed under a cloudless sky becomes a " broad blue wave ;" the "cowslip-gathering in May's dewy prime " of the wanderer on Salisbury Plain in her girlhood is transferred from May to June. The Broom boasting her good fortune, exclaims : " The Spring for me a garland weaves Of yellow flowers and verdant leaves.'' * In the Lyrical Ballads (1805) a fine addition was made, " It was a fresh and glorious world," &c., and an important improvement effected hy transposing stanzas. t On the other hand a stanza opens with an imperfect line through the rejection of Coleridge's "A simple child, dear brother Jim," which had served to introduce the poem " We are Seven " in "Lyrical Ballads." 1 40 Transcripts and Studies. On reconsideration she finds her benefactor to be Summer — " On me such bounty Summer pours That I am covered o'er with flowers." Or again a word is found unsuitable, or has been im- properly used — " Forth he teems His little song in gushes." So Wordsworth wrote in " The Green Linnet," 1 807. The Edinburgh Reviewer italicized the word teems, and it disappeared from the poem. In the " Boy of Winan- dermere " the word scene occurred twice — once in the vague popular sense, which carries with it no reference to anything visual — "A wild scene Of mirth and jocund din." The passage is altered (1805) to " Concourse wild of jocund din." * One adjective Wordsworth had loved and used for its own sake with a peculiar fondness in his earlier poems, the adjective sweet. A hard time of it this innocent adjective had in after-years ; it was hunted as a criminal, discovered in its nestling-places, dragged to the critical judgment-seat, and sentenced, in numerous instances, to perpetual banishment. Sweet smiles, sweet looks, sweet flowers, sweet bowers, sweet flocks, sweet mornings greet us no more where they once did, and bright looks, soft bowers, fine flocks take their place. " No Nightingale did ever chaunt So sweetly to reposing bands " * See Sara Coleridge's note on this passage : " Biographia Literaria," vol. ii. pp. 111-113 (ed. 1847). The Text of Wordsworth! s Poems. 141 as the Solitary Reaper sang ia Wordsworth's hearing — " No sweeter voice was ever heard In spring-time from the cuckoo-bird " than that voice of hers. In later editions the lines become, " No Nightingale did ever chaunt More welcome notes to weary bands. A voice so thrilling ne'er was heard In spring-time from the cuckoo-bird." A special power of the verb to he, by which the predica- tion of bare existence, apart from qualities and operations, produces a certain spiritualising effect, had at one time an attraction for Wordsworth's mind, which it afterwards appears to have lost. He notices this power of the verb in a letter which explains his feelings in writing " The Leech-gatherer." " What," he asks, " is brought for- ward ? A lonely place, ' a pond by which an old man w(xs, far from all house and home ; ' not stood, nor sat, but wchs — the figure presented in the most naked simplicity possible." But this letter was written while " The Leech-gatherer " was still in manuscript, and when the poem appeared in print the xvas had been replaced by stood. " The stars they were among my dreams," Wordsworth wrote in 1798, and it is matter of rejoicing that this beautiful line again took its place in " The Complaint of a Forsaken Indian Woman," after it had for a time been dispossessed by the unimaginative words: "The stars were iningled with my dreams." Not so fortunate was the first poem, " On the Naming of Places : " 142 Transcripts and Studies. " Yet meanwhile There was such deep contentment in the aif." has been abandoned for " But meanwhile prevailed Such an entire contentment in the air.'' Still greater is the loss in the sonnet beginning " It is a beauteous evening calm and free," where the dwelling effect of the word broods in the line — " The gentleness of heaven broods o'er the sea," is a poor gain to set over against the loss of that line of 1807, which rendered so purely that living union of the abysses of the waters and the sky — " The gentleness of heaven is on the sea." Before leaving this sonnet we may note the happy reversion of Wordsworth to the original reading of the first line. In the complete collection of Sonnets, 1838, we find — " A.ir sleeps, — from strife or stir the clouds are free ; " and again, a few years later, a second attempt was made at improving what was perfect — " A fairer face of evening cannot be." But the simple positive statement that the time was perfect sufSced, and it resumed its place at last. Another group of minute verbal changes is worthy of attention, because it shows some alteration of feeling on Wordsworth's part with reference to poetical personifica- tion. His recoil from the unreality and vapidity of eighteenth-century work pretending to be imaginative had gone too far. " There ! that dusky spot Beneath thee, that is England, there she lies," The Text of Wordsworth's Poems, 143 is truer to the aroused loyalty and love of our mother- country than the original " there it lies." So, too — " Ye children of a soil that doth advance Her haughty brow against the coast of France," is right, and the earlier " its haughty brow " was justly condemned.* Not a few of the later readings in "Wordsworth's text had their origin in the writer's wish to temper some expression which seemed too harsh or violent, to bring within bounds some extravagance, or to tone down into harmony with its surrounding some line of crude vivid- ness. Thus the service of attendants in a public hospital (" Guilt and Sorrow ") is spoken of at first as being rendered with " careless cruelty ; " afterwards with " cold formality;" the lawyer in "A Poet's Epitaph " is at first bid to carry elsewhere " The hardness of thy coward eye, The falsehood of thy sallow face ; " in later editions " The keenness of that practised eye, The hardness of that sallow face ;" and the philosopher who would peep and botanise upon his mother's grave has in tbe earliest text a "pin-point of a soul," altered in 1815 to "that abject thing, thy soul," and finally settling down into " thy ever-dwindling soul." So again in " Hart-leap Well," the three bounds of the hunted animal, in the first form of the tale, cover * It is more questionable whether "And yet thy heart The lowliest duties on AerseJ/ did lay,'' gains upon the original iUdf. Duties, Wordsworth no doubt argued, belong to a person — not to a thing. 1 44 Transcripts and Studies. no less than " nine roods " of ground, reduced at a later time to " three roods ; " * in the same poem Sir Walter's horse, after his eager up-hill race, stands " foaming like a mountain cataract ; " the words appeared extravagant, and the poet, at the cost of finding a new rhyme, altered them, in a not unfortunate moment, to " white with foam as if with cleaving sleet." A favourite dog — little Music — had lived to extreme old age, when a gentle death might seem a thing to be desired. In the " Tribute to the Memory " of this dog, we read, in 1807— " I prayed for thee, and that thy end were past." And why not ? Had not Coleridge taught that " He prayeth best who loveth best All things both great and small ?" Was not Music worth many sparrows ? In 1820, Wordsworth, if he prayed, prayed in secret, and the line is altered to " I grieved for thee and wished thy end was past." Perhaps no alteration falling under this head is more remarkable than the omission from the Thanksgiving Ode, 1816, of the awful words addressed to the Lord of Hosts — " But Thy most dreaded instrument. In working out a pure intent. Is Man — arrayed for mutual slaughter — Yea, Carnage is thy daughter ! " * So also in " Anecdote for Fathers " (1798)— " And/j;e times to the child I said, ' Why, Edward, tell me why ? ' " changed to "three, times" (after 1843). And so, again, Leonard's age in " The Brothers," at the date when he parts from James, is altered from thirteen to sixteen, to allow time for the growth of so deep a fraternal love. The Text of Wordsworth's Poems. 145 These lines (tlie word " dreaded" having been changed to " awful") were retained as late as 1843. The hour of stern enthusiasm, inspired by a prophetic vision, needs not to be revised and corrected by the hour of meditative calm. At the same time a more important change was effected. The Ode was sliced into a number of pieces ; some of these remained to represent the Ode of ] 8 1 6 as originally published ; the others were pieced together to form the companion Ode now dated 1815. It is painful to think that the poem possessed so little unity of inward life as to allow of this slicing process. Can it have been that the portion now dated 1815 was indeed written in that year, was worked into the ode, kindred in subject, of the following year, and that in dividing the poem as Wordsworth did at the last, he was but recurring to the original and natural arrangement of his first manuscript ? Such changes were not always judicious. Some of them, as has been said, may have been concessions to Wordsworth's readers. "On my alluding," Crabb Eobinson recorded in 1815, "to the lines — ' I've measured it from side to side, 'Tis three feet long and two feet wide,' and confessing that I dared not read them aloud in company, he said, 'They ought to be liked.'" The poet, however, at length capitulated to his critics. I must confess to some regret for the loss of the precise statistics in this poem ; I really wish to know whether Martha Eay drowned her baby in the little pond, or not ; perhaps from a lack of humour on my part the words K 1 46 Transcripts and Studies. have never made me smile, and the strangeness and mystery of the poem seemed to me the more affecting because they lived and moved amid details so prosaic and precise* One change in " The Thorn " assuredly no true lover of the " Lyrical Ballads " can accept, that which transforms plain old Farmer Simpson into " grey- haired Wilfred of the glen ; " if this is to be received, then let Martha Kay obtain leave to be known hence- forth as Anna Matilda or Laura Maria, and Stephen Hill in future be named Lothario. Nor can a true lover of Wordsworth feel anything but blushing shame at the spurious dignity lent to the voyage of the Blind Highland Boy by the poetical craft in which he drifts away (1815), Wordsworth having consigned to obscurity that humbler vessel, " A household tub, like one of those Which women use to wash their clothes.'' (1807.) The turtle-shell was, however, in 1815, a turtle-shell and nothing more. Again yielding to external pressure the lines which compare it to the pearly car of Amphi- trite, and the coracle on V^aga's breast, were added (1820); we have indeed travelled far from the Scottish salt-sea loch and the little Highland cottage. Now and * Wordsworth probably would have defended the lines on dramatic grounds, the supposed narrator being some such man as " a captain of a small trading vessel . . . who, being past the middle age of life, had retired upon an annuity, or small independent income, to some village or country town of which he was not a native." The Edmhwrgh iJmewer parodies the ammoBce .• "Of this piece the reader will neces- sarily form a very erroneous judgment, unless he is apprised that it was written by a pale man in a green coat, sitting cross-legged on an oaken stool, with a scratch on his nose, and a spelling dictionary on a table." The Text of Wordsworth! s Poems. 147 again a touch of homely reality disappears in the later versions, as in "Personal Talk'' that reference to the little room at Town-End, Grasmere, in which Words- worth and his sister ate and wrote. " The last line but two stood at first," Wordsworth himself said, "better and more characteristically, thus : ' By my half-kitchen, my half -parlour fire.' " Sometimes a phrase, ennobled by its power of spiritual interpretation, is condemned on the ground that it is over-familiar ; Wordsworth listened and listened to the voice of the Solitary Reaper, and did not move away until his soul was satisfied : " I listen'd till I had ray fill," a perfect line, which gives way in later editions to the very commonplace one — ■ " I listened, motionless and still." Sometimes a lively metaphorical expression is replaced by one less vivid : " The torrent down the rocky dell Came thundering loud and fast," and the Eglantine trembled ; in a " Poem of the Fancy," the earlier reading might have been permitted to stand, — " The stream came thundering down the dell, And gallop'd loud and fast." The apostrophe to the Daisy as " bold lover of the sun " is an audacity which surely justifies itself, yet it could not keep its place. Crabb Robinson notes in his diary. 148 Transcripts and Studies. 1815, "Wordsworth has substituted ebullient iot fiery, speaking of the nightingale. ' Nightingale, thou surely art A creature of a fiery heart,' and jocund for laughing, applied to the daffodils ; but he will probably restore the original epithets." Half of the prophecy was fortunately fulfilled, and we can read " The Nightingale" without feeling that, like Mac- beth's Amen, the ebullient sticks in our throats. Would that Wordsworth, in the happy hour which restored the " fiery heart" to the Nightingale, had given us back the fire in the old man's eyes who stood upon the margin of the moorish flood : " Ere he replied, a flash of mild surprise Broke from the sable orbs of his yet vivid eyes." These are fine lines, but we rather hold by the original, " He answered me with pleasure and surprise. And there was while he spake a fire about his eyes." * But I have played the part of the critical Polouius long enough. " Mdbled queen is good," or rather, in- deed, " this is too long," as was the chamberlain's beard. The reader, however, who has followed me so far, will permit a brief notice of four poems which have under- gone particularly interesting alterations. The second verse of the " Cuckoo" is an example of the attainment of perfect words, which look most simple, natural, and * Some readers will, perhaps, be glad to restore in their private thoughts the original text of a touching verse in " The Fountain : " — " ' And, Matthew, for thy children dead, I'll be a son to thee,' At this he grasp'd his hands and said, ' Alas ! that cannot be. ' " The Text of Wordsworth's Poems. 149 direct, through a series of fortunate experiments. The various attempts may be presented without comment : — " While I am lying on the grass, I hear thy restless shout ; From hill to hill it seems to pass About, and all about ! " (1 807.) While I am lying on the grass, Thy loud note smites my ear ! — From hill to hill it seems to pass, At once far off and near !" (1815.) " While I am lying on the grass, Thy loud note smites my ear ; It seems to fill the whole air's space. At once far off and near." (1820.) " While I am lying on the grass. Thy two-fold shout I hear. That seems to fill the whole air's space, As loud far off as near." (1827.) " While I am lying on the grass, Thy two-fold shout I hear ; From hill to hill it seems to pass, At once far off and near. (1849 ; certainly after 1843.) Nearly half a century was needed for the creation of this dewdrop of poetry.* Among the characteristic defects of Wordsworth's poetry commented on by Coleridge, he, notices " thoughts and images too great for the subject," and as an example he cites the poem on the " Gipsies." The speaker in that poem expresses his indignation at the listless inactivity of the poor tawny wanderers, during one day, " in a series of lines, the diction and imagery of which * This example of Wordsworth's alterations of the text seems also to have struck Professor Knight, who presents the various readings in the Preface to his edition of Wordsworth's Poetical Works, as I had done in this article. 150 Transcripts and Studies. would have been rather above than below the mark, had they been applied to the immense empire of China, unprogressive for thirty centuries." I am not about to consider the justice of this criticism, but to call atten- tion to the closing lines of the poem as it originally stood. The sun has gone to rest after his labour, the evening star has come forth, the mighty moon looks this way: — " But they Eegard her not ; — oh, better wrong and strife, Better vain deeds or evil than such life ! The silent heavens have goings on ; The stars have tasks — but these have none." When the first recast of this passage was made, the last two lines were still retained in conjunction with some added lines of inferior quality, but finally they were altogether excluded, and the poem closes with a half- apology for the tawny wanderers : — " They are what their birth And breeding suffer them to be : Wild outcasts of society." Now we do not take too generous a view of human in- telligence when we say that several thousands of men, women, and children could at the present moment utter, if need were, this very obvious reflection. But who at any time, except Wordsworth, could have written the words, " The silent heavens have goings on " ? And for this reason they must not pass from our memory. " Beggars," a poem for which Wordsworth had a special regard, underwent so many rehandlings, and The Text of Wordsworth's Poems. 1 5 1 the details of these are so perplexing, that it is im- possible to put them here before the reader. He would do well to compare the states of the poem in 1807 (or 1815) with those of 1820, 1827, and 1832. It will be seen that the long drab-coloured cloak of the majestic beggar, after becoming a blue mantle, finally descended to her feet with a graceful flow. The lines, " Haughty, as if her eye had seen Its own light to a distance thrown," replace others more simple, less grand ; the stanza which compares the boys to " precursors of Aurora's car" is an after-thought of 1827 ; the boys in whose " fraternal features" the poet can now trace " Unquestionable lines of that wild suppliant's face " were at first two brothers, " eight and ten years old, And like that woman's face as gold is like to gold." The changes, as will be perceived, all tend in the direc- tion of a more dignified treatment of the subject. The single example of absolute reversal by Words- worth of the central motive of one of his own poems is in "Laodamia." The verbal changes, indeed, in the poem are few : — " The gods approve The depth and not the tumult of the soul, Thefervow — not the impotence of love," stood originally where now we find " A fervent, not un- governable love," and, influenced probably by Lander's criticism, both the first verse was recast, and those lines altered in which the shade of Protesilaus speaks, " As a witness, of a second birth For all that is most perfect upon earth." 152 Transcripts and Studies. " Witness " and " second birth ! " exclaimed Landor, "however holy and venerable in themselves, come stinking and reeking to us from the conventicle." But these are matters of secondary importance. It is the reversal of the moral judgment on Laodamia's un- governed love of her lord which we know not how to accept. Why should she, who was at first judged gently and forgiven, quoniam dilexit multum, be afterwards condemned to everlasting banishment in " a grosser clime, apart from happy ghosts " ? By no weak pity ■would Wordsworth or the gods be moved for a time ; after many hesitations and questionings (apparent through the altering forms of the text), it was at length decreed that the impassioned queen should not be for ever exiled from the presence of him she loved ; the " grosser clime " is no longer her doom ; only secluded from the spirits who gather flowers of blissful quiet she abides, wearing out her appointed time — a season of hours now no sadder than a purgatorial term.* * See, on " Laodamia," an interesting piece of criticism in "Guesses at Truth " {Second Series), and a singularly hard, unsympathetic study by Sara Coleridge : " Memoir and Letters," vol. ii. Mention ought perhaps to have been made of a poem never included, I believe, in any edition of Wordsworth's works, "The Installation Ode," 1847, written in compliance with a request not to be refused for the occasion of Prince Albert's Installation as Chancellor of the Uni- versity of Cambridge. A short and touching letter of the aged poet will be found in Mr Theodore Martin's " Life of the Prince Consort." The Ode is printed in The Athenceam, July 10th, 1847. Dora Qaillinan, who had been for some months declining, died on July 9th. This Laureate-poem, born in sorrow, was only in part of Wordsworth's authorship ; it was completed by his nephew, the late Bishop of Lincoln. VICTORIAN LITERATURE. The literature of the Elizabethan age was the flowering through art of a new faith and a new joy — a faith in the spiritual truths recovered by the Reformation move- ment, a joy in the world of nature and of human life as presented in the magic mirror of the Renaissance. Within a decade of years ■ having fqr its centre the year of Queen Elizabeth's accession, were born Sidney, Spenser, Raleigh, Chapman, Daniel, Drayton, Marlowe, Hooker, Bacon, Shakspere. Never before or since in England were such prizes drawn in the lottery of babies. Never before or since had the good fairies who bring gifts to cradles so busy a time. But it was not until Elizabeth's reign had run more than half its course, and these boys were grown to man's estate, that the great summer of literature showed its flowers and fruit. The " Laws of Ecclesiastical Polity," the six books of the " Faerie Queene," the " Essays " of Bacon, " Romeo and Juliet," " As You Like It," and " Henry V." belong to the last period of Elizabeth's reign, that which opens with the defeat of the Armada; and many writings which we commonly class under the head of Elizabethan literature — "King Lear" and "The Tempest," "The Advancement of Learning," " The History of the World," " The Alchemist " and " The Silent Woman " — are named Elizabethan only because they continue the 1 54 Transcripts and Studies. same literary movenaent and carry it on through the period which had hardly culminated before her death. The literature of the reign of Queen Anne was the expression of the better mind of England when it had recovered itself through good sense and moderation of temper from the Puritan excess and from the Cavalier excess. Enthusiasm was discredited, and faith had no wings to soar ; but it was something to have escaped the spiritual orgies of the saints and the sensual riot of the king's new courtiers ; it was something to have attained to a sober way of regarding human life, and to the pro- visional resting-place of a philosophical and theological compromise. Addison's humane smile, Pope's ethics of good sense, and the exquisite felicity of manner in each writer, represent and justify the epoch. Our own age has been named the sceculum realisticum; men of science have claimed it as their own, and count- less pseans have been chanted in honour of our material and mechanical advancement. Yet it is hardly less distinguished by its ardours of hope and aspiration, by its eager and anxious search for spiritual truth, by its restlessness in presence of spiritual anarchy, by its de- sire for some spiritual order. It has been pre-eminently an age of intellectual and moral trial, difficulty and danger ; of bitter farewells to things of the past, of ardent welcomes to things as yet but dimly discerned in the coming y^ears ; of dissatisfaction with the actual and of immense desire ; an age of seekers for light, each having trouble too plainly written upon his forehead. If a precise date must be chosen separating the present period of literature from that which immediately pre- Victorian Literature. 155 cedes it, we shall do well to fix on the year 1832. In that year the Bill for the representation of the people placed the future destiny of England in the hands of the middle classes, and a series of social and political reforms speedily followed. In that year died a great imaginative restorer of the past, and also a great intellectual pioneer of the future. Amid his nineteenth-century feudalisms, within sound of the old Border river, Scott passed away, murmuring to himself, as he lay in his bed, some fragment of the Litany or verse from the venerable hymns of the Romish ritual. On an autumn evening his body was laid in the resting-place of his forefathers amid the monastic ruins of Dryburgh. It was in London, just at the close of a fierce political struggle, that Jeremy Bentham died. To the last he had been " codifying like any dragon"; when he heard the verdict of his physi- cian, that death was inevitable, the cheerful utilitarian thought first of a practical application of his own doc- trine. " Very well," he said serenely, " be it so ; then minimise pain," and so departed, leaving his viscera to be dissected for the benefit of mankind, and his skeleton when duly arrayed to do the honours at University College. By the year 1832 the flood-tide of English poetry had withdrawn from the shores which had lightened and sung with the splendour and music of the earlier days of the century. It was eleven years since Keats had found rest in the flowery cemetery at Rome ; ten years since Shelley, in a whirl of sea-mist, had solved the great mystery that had haunted him since boyhood. Byron's memory was still a power, but a power that constantly 156 Transcripts and Studies. waned. Southey had forsaken poetry, and was just now rejoicing over the words, Laus Deo, written on the last page of his " History of the Peninsular War ; " surely at last those " subsecive hours " were at hand in which he might bring to a fruitful outcome the great labour of two-and-thirty years, his never- to-be- written " History of Portugal." It was in 1832 that Wordsworth, con- scious of the loss of the glory and the freshness of his earlier manhood, and conscious also that he had never forfeited a poet's prerogative, wrote those lines prefixed to his complete works, in which he exhorts the heaven- inspired singer to fidelity and contentment, whether he shine as a great star in the zenith or burn like an untended watch - fire on the ridge of some dark mountain : — " If thou, indeed, derive thy light from Heaven, Then, to the measure of that heaven-born light. Shine, Poet ! in thy place, and be content." Few of Wordsworth's poems of later date than 1832 can be said to dart their beams with planetary influence from the zenith. Yet there is no fond self-pity in his lines, as there are in those which Coleridge, compassed about with infirmity, printed in that same year, 1832, in BlcLckwood's Magazine, under the title " The Old Man's Sigh " : — " Where no hope is, life's a warning That only serves to make us grieve In our old age, "Whose bruised -wings quarrel with the bars of the still narrowing cage." * * The text was afterwards altered, and the poem was made a por- tion of "Youth and Age," Victorian Literature. 157 Coleridge, indeed, had but a brief waiting before release from the cage was granted him. "Saw Cole- ridge in bed," writes Crabb Robinson (April 12, 1832). " He looked beautifully — his eye remarkably brilliant — and he talked as eloquently as ever." The voyager through strange seas of thought still held men with his glittering eye and told his tale of wonder, but his voyaging and his work were indeed over. This year, 1832, which we have taken as the line of division between Victorian literature and that of the first literary period of the nineteenth century, was also the year of the death of an illustrious poet whose earlier verses had delighted Burke and won the approval of Johnson, and whose later writings were celebrated by Byron and had been the solace of Scott's dying days. Crabbe, whose life and poetry thus served to link together two widely different epochs of literature, touched the boundary of a third era, but his foot was not permitted to pass beyond the limit. A student of the poetry of the age of Elizabeth who happens to be also a reader of the poetry of our own time, can hardly fail to be impressed by one important point of contrast between these two bodies of literature. The poets of the Elizabethan age — excepting, perhaps, Spenser — seem to have got on very happily and success- fully without theories of human life or doctrines respecting human society ; but our nineteenth-century poets are almost all sorely puzzled about certain problems of existence, and, having laboured at their solution, come forward witb some lightening of the burden of the mystery, with some hope or some solace ; or else they 158 Transcripts and Studies. deliberately and studiously turn away from this spiritual travail, not without an underlying consciousness that such turning away is treasonable, to seek for beauty or pleasure or repose. In those strenuous days of the English Renaissance, so full of resolution and energy and achievement, when a broad, healthy, mundane activity replaced the intensity and wistfuluess and passion of mediieval religion and the exaltations of chivalry ; when the world grew spacious and substantial, when mirth was open and unashamed, and when the tragedy of life con- sisted in positive wrestling of man with man and of nation with nation — in those days there was an absorb- ing interest in action and the tug of human passions ; the vital relation of man with man in mutual love or conflict was that which the imagination of the period delighted to present to itself ; it was the age of the drama, and men did not pause in the career of living to devise systems or theories or doctrines of life. But the unity of national thought and feeling ceased when Puritan stood over against Anglican and Roundhead against Cavalier. It became necessary to pause and consider and decide. A youth of fine moral temper coming to manhood when Milton wrote his " Comus," had a choice to make — a choice between two doctrines in religion, two parties in the State, two principles of human conduct. Instead of that free abandonment to the action and passion of the world, characteristic of the Elizabethan period, there was now a self-conscious pursuit of certain ideals — an ideal of loyalty to Church and Crown, with grace and gallantry and wit, or else the stern Puritan ideals — the vigorous liberty of a Republic ; the Church, Victorian Literature, ■ 159 a congregation of saints; and a severity and grave majesty of personal character. Milton is deeply inter- ested in providing himself and others with a moral rule of life, and with some doctrine which shall explain the mysteries of existence. He must needs get some answer to the why and wherefore, the whence and whither of the world. Shakspere had cared to see what things are, all of pity and terror, all of beauty and mirth, that human life contains — Lear in the storm, and Falstaff in the tavern, and Perdita among her flowers. He had said, " These things are," and had refused to put the question, " How can these things be ? " Milton, on the contrary, in the forefront of his epic, announces with the confidence of a great dogmatist that, aided by Divine illumination, he aspires " to justify the ways of God to man." Our own age is and has been, in a far profounder sense than the term can be applied to the age of Milton, an age of revolution. Society, founded on the old feudal doctrines, has gone to wreck in the storms that have blown over Europe during the last hundred years. A new industrial and democratic period has been in- augurated ; already the interregnum of government by the middle classes has proved its provisiocal character. But the social and political forms suitable to this new epoch are as yet unorganised, and perhaps have not as yet been truly conceived. The contributions towards an ideal reconstruction of society by Fourier, by Eobert Owen, by Auguste Comte, by Lasalle and Karl Marx, testify to the profound dissatisfaction of aspiring minds with the present chaos of our social and political rela- 1 60 Transcripts and Studies. tions ; and we have seen within the last few years that masses of men, filled with discontent and immoderate hopes that spring from the ashes of despair, are danger- ously eager to turn into actual experiment the immature ideas of the thinkers. "What we want before all else is a true thought, or body of organic thoughts, large and reasonable, which shall include all the conditions of our case. Then again it is evident that a prolonged testing of religious ideas has been going forward. Theology, once the science of sciences, is said to be superseded, and in its place we have got a " science of religions." God, to whom once all highest hopes and fears tended and were referred, the living God whom man. His creature, might love and adore aad obey, has been superannuated, and we are requested to cultivate henceforth enthusiasm on behalf of "a stream of tendency" which "makes for righteousness." Or perhaps it is more in harmony with the principles of a scientific age to direct our devout emotions to the great ensemble of humanity : " en- semble of humanity, thou art my ensemble ; early will I seek thee : my soul thirsteth for thee in a dry and thirsty land, where no water is." Or yet again may it not be that we can dispense with this awkward en- semble — a leviathan of pettinesses — and recognising the existence of an Unknowable, may possess in that recog- nition the essence of all religions : " Sing unto the Un- knowable, ye saints of its, and give thanks at the remembrance of its unknowableness." It takes a little time and some tuning of the ear before we can feel that the new psalmody is quite as Victorian Literature. 1 6 1 happy in its phrasing as the old. The revolution or threatened revolution in the religious order seems to us no less real and no less important than that in the political and social order. In truth, not a conception of any kind respecting the world and man and the life of man remains what it was a century since. Science sap- ping in upon every side of human thought and feeling, is effecting in our views of the individual and of the race a modification as startling as that effected in cos- mical conceptions by the discovery of Copernicus that this earth is not the centre of the universe, but one orb among its brother orbs in a system too vast and glorious for imagination to comprehend. The past of humanity has expanded from the six thousand years of the old biblical chronologists to measureless aeons of time ; the sense of the myriad, intimate relations between the present and all this past has grown strong within us, per- haps tyrannously strong ; while, at the same time, it is impossible to restrain the imagination from a forward gaze into futurity, which seems to open a vista as remote and unfathomable as the past. We were once apes or ascidians, therefore we shall some day be the angels of this earth.* Since Oordorcet speculated and * Or possibly crows. " 'You must read the "Eevelationsof Chaos,'" said Lady Constance to Tancred," in Disraeli's novel ; " 'it is all ex- plained. But vphat is most interesting is the way in which man has been developed. You know, all is development. The principle is perpetually going on. First, there was nothing, then there was some- thing ; then, I forget the next, I think there were shells, then fishes ; then we came, let me see, did we come next ? Never mind that ; we came at last. And the next change there will be something very superior to us, something with wings. Ah ! that's it : we were fishes, and I lielieve we shall be crows. But you must read it. ' 'I do not believe I ever was a fish,' said Tancred." ti 1 62 Transcripts and Studies. since Shelley sang, there have been wild hopes of human perfectability in the prophetic soul of the world dreaming of things to come ; and in soberness and truth there has grown up a general confidence in a progress of mankind towards good, which seems to be justified by the most careful scrutiny of the past history of humanity from primitive barbarism to the present imperfect forms of civilisation. If, moreover, the conviction that we and all that surrounds us have been so largely deter- mined by the past sometimes weighs on us with tyran- ous power, the thought that we in our turn are shaping the destinies of future generations becomes a moral motive of almost irresistible force, compelling us to high resolve and dutiful action. The stress of the spiritual and social revolution has been widely felt during the second half of the last fifty years ; the twenty-five years which preceded these were a period of comparative tranquillity, a period during which the vast additions made to the means and appli- ances of living somewhat hid out of view the dangers and difficulties of life itself from eyes that did not possess the true seer's vision. The ten-pound householder had his vote ; slavery was abolished in the colonies ; the evils of pauperism were met by a Poor Law ; the bread- tax was abolished ; the people were advancing in education ; useful knowledge was made accessible in cheap publications ; a man could travel forty miles in the time in which his father could have travelled ten ; more iron, more coal, was dug out of the earth ; more wheels were whirling, more shuttles flew, more looms rattled, more cotton was spun, more cloth was sold. Victorian Literature. 163 The statistics of progress were surely enough to intoxi- cate with joy a lover of his species. The sanguine temper of the period and its somewhat shallow, material conception of human welfare, are well represented in the writings of Macaulay. Incompar- ably great as an accumulator, arranger, and setter-forth of knowledge, he must accept a subordinate place if judged by spiritual standards. Prosperous himself through all his years, which marched with the years of the century, never troubled by inward doubt and per- plexity or falterings of heart, never borne away by eager aspirations towards some unattainable spiritual perfection, Macaulay loved his age as a good boy might love an indulgent mother, who gave no end of cakes and pocket- money, and was jolly to all the other fellows as well as to himself And the mother was justly proud of her vigorous, kindly, cheerful, clever son. How much to her liking was that contrast between the Platonic and the Baconian philosophy : " An acre in Middlesex is better than a prin- cipality in Utopia. The smallest actual good is better than the most magnificent promises of impossibilities. The wise man of the Stoics would, no doubt, be a grander object than a steam-engine. But there are steam-engines. And the wise man of the Stoics is yet to be born." And a thousand readers huzzaed and tossed up their caps for the steam-engine, and held Plato and Marcus Aurelius and Epictetus cheap. Southey, comparing the old cottages of the English peasantry, the solid weather-stained material, the ornamented chim- neys, round or square, the hedge of dipt box beneath the windows, the rose-bushes beside the door, the little 1 64 Transcripts and Studies. patch of flower-ground with its tall hollyhocks in front, the orchard with its bank of daffodils and snowdrops — Southey, comparing these with the new cottages of the manufacturers built upon the manufacturing pattern, naked and in a row, had asked, " How is it that every- thing which is connected with manufactures presents such features of unqualified deformity?" — a question which Mr Ruskin and Mr William Morris, and in his own way Mr Frederic Harrison, are asking to-day. And Macaulay answered with a contemptuous snort, " Here is wisdom. Here are principles on which nations are to be governed. Rose-bushes and poor-rates, rather than steam-engines and independence." Huzza ! there- fore, once more for the steam-engine ; all is going on beautifully with England : laisser /aire, laisser aller. " It is not by the interrneddling of Mr Southey's idol, the omniscient and omnipotent state, but by the prudence and energy of the people, that England has hitherto been carried forward in civilisation, and it is to the same prudence and the same energy that we now look with comfort and good hope." Truly the whirligig of time has brought Southey and the provident, though not omniscient or omnipotent, state their revenge. Tender regrets for the past, for the age when English hands could rear the Cathedral, when English hearts could lift one common hymn of faith and praise, are, if we may trust Macaulay, the follies of the sentimentalist. In those ages " noblemen were destitute of comforts the want of which would be intolerable to a modern foot- man, farmers and shopkeepers breakfasted on loaves the very sight of which would raise a riot in a modern Victorian Literature. 165 workhouse." But if it be folly to chase backward through time a vanishing mirage, we may confidently look forward to a golden age iu the near future — a golden age of more abundant beef and richer pudding. " It may well be, in the twentieth century, that the peasant of Dorsetshire may think himself miserably paid with fifteen shillings a week ; that the carpenter at Greenwich may receive ten shillings a day ; that labour- ing men may be as little used to dine without meat as they now are to eat rye-bread." Why let fancy thus halt upon the borders of the terrestrial paradise ? Why not imagine the twenty-first century, when the carpenter may receive a pound a day, and have butcher's meat at dinner, breakfast, and tea? In May, 1851, Macaulay visited the great Exhibition, and strolled for a long time under its glass and iron through acres of glorified shops. " Crystal Palace — bless the mark ! — is fast getting ready," Carlyle had written in his diary a few days before this ; " and bearded figures already grow frequent on the streets ; ' all nations ' crowding to us with their so-called industry or ostentatious frothery. All the loose population of London pours itself every holiday into Hyde Park round this strange edifice. ... My mad humour is urging me to flight from this monstrous place." " I went to the Exhibition," writes Macaulay, " and lounged there during some hours. I never knew a sight which extorted from all ages, classes, and nations, such unanimous and genuine admiration. I felt a glow of eloquence, or something like it, come on me from the mere effect of the place." And again, on the opening day : " I made my way into the building ; a most 1 66 Transcripts and Studies. gorgeous sight ; vast, graceful, beyond the dreams of the Arabian romances. I cannot think that the Caesars ever exhibited a more splendid spectacle. I was quite dazzled, and I felt as I did on entering St Peter's." Brilliant and indefatigable son of an age of commerce and middle-class ascendancy ! his eloquent pages would nowhere else read so well as under those best of iron girders, beneath the splendours of the largest plate-glass, and amid such decorations, and art, and industry — where nothing nestles or lurks, but all is set forth for display — as were the glory and delight of the year ISol. Macaulay, the historian of the first Victorian period, with his company of brilliant actors and his splendid spectacle, had but one rival in popularity, and that rival, the novelist of the period, exhibits with equal force, in his own province of literature, the characteristics of the time, its sanguine temper, its bourgeois ideals. To have awakened the laughter of innumerable readers during half a century is to have been no slight benefac- tor of the world; and 1886, the jubilee year of Pick- wick, ought to have been celebrated with bumpers and exuberant mirth. England, the " weary Titan " of Mr Arnold's majestic simile, is all the better in health for having had to hold her sides with glee. And the tears that have been shed for little Nell and Paul Dombey and Tiny Tim have been a kindly dew, laying some of the dust of the world. And yet the accusations of melodrama, of pseudo-pathos, of overwrought caricature, have been brought against Dickens not unjustly. We have known a nobler laughter than his, and tears more Victorian Literature. 167 sacred. The laughter of one whose vision embraces the deepest and highest facts of life has in it a lyrical purity and passion which uplift the spirit as the laughter of Dickens never can ; in such mirth there is no loose squandering of the heart, no orgy of animal spirits, nor does it spring from a perception of trivial incongruities ; there is nothing in it of the mere grin ; it is exquisite, refined, radiant, because it grows from a hidden root of severity. Such is the mirth of Shakspere's "Tempest" and the " Winter's Tale," following hard upon his " King Lear " and " Othello." And in the tears of one who has conversed with the soul in the great moments of its fate there is no moisture of sentimentalism. The pathos is divested of all prettiness ; it is more than an affair of the nerves, or even of the heart. It is at its highest the exquisite spiritual pity, allied with the unfaltering justice, of Dante. We rejoice that Dickens should have quick- ened the sensibility of the English middle class for the trials and sufferings and sorrows of the poor ; we rejoice that he should have gladdened the world with inex- haustible comedy and farce. But it were better if he had discovered that for man and the life of man there is something needful over and above good spirits, a sufficient dinner, and overflowing good-nature. His ideal of human happiness was that of his readers ; their middle-class notions of human well-being and of what is most admirable in character he gave them back, ani- mated by his own vigorous animal spirits — that super- abundant vitality which, when he wrote the name " Charles Dickens," produced such a whirl of flourishes before the pen could rest. Banish from earth some few 1 68 Transcripts and Studies. monsters of selfishness, malignity, and hypocrisy, set to rights a few obvious imperfections in the machinery of society, inspire all men with a cheery benevolence, and everything will go well with this excellent world of ours. Such in brief was the teaching delivered by Dickens to his time, and he claimed to be regarded as a teacher. But let us rather choose to think of him as a widener of our sympathies, and as a creator of comic and sentimental types ; then we shall see a whole population gather for his defence, and — flace aux dames — Sairey Gamp, armed in his cause, it is who leads the van. There is no sense of dissatisfaction with himself in what Dickens writes. How should one tingling with life to the finger-tips be displeased with his own person- ality ? And, setting aside certain political or social inconveniences, " circumlocution offices," and such like, clearly capable of amendment, there was, in Dickens's view, nothing profoundly ailing with society. Thackeray bad a quarrel with himself and a quarrel with society ; but his was not a temper to push things to extremes. He could not acquiesce in the ways of the world, its shabbiness, its shams, its snobbery, its knavery ; he could not acquiesce, and yet it is only for born prophets to break with the world and go forth into the wilderness crying, " Eepent ! " Why affect to be a prophet, and wear camels' hair and eat locusts and wild honey, adding one more sham to the many, when after all the club is a pleasant lounge, and anthropologj' is a most attractive study ? Better patch up a truce with the world, which will not let one be a hero, but is not wholly evil ; the great criminals are few ; men in general are rather Victorian Literature. 169 weak than wicked ; vain and selfish, but not malignant. It is infinitely diverting to watch the ways of the petty human animal. One can always preserve a certain independence by that unheroic form of warfare suitable to an unheroic age — satire ; one can even in a certain sense stand above one's own pettiness by virtue of irony ; and there is always the chance of discovering some angel wandering unrecognised among the snobs and the flunkeys in the form of a brave, simple-hearted man or pure-souled, tender woman. Whether right or wrong, this compromise with the world is only for a few days. Heigh-ho ! everything hastens to the common end — vanitas vaniiatum. The morality of this compromise with the world is fully discussed by Thackeray himself in his " Pendennis," and he arrives at no decisive result. Mr Pen is on terms of friendship with the great Simpson of the Royal Gardens of Vauxhall, and shakes the lovely equestrian of the arena by the hand : — " And while he could watch the grimaces or the graces of those ■with a satiric humour that was not deprived of sympathy, he could look on with an eye of kindness at the lookers-on too ; at the roystering youth bent upon enjoyment, and here taking it ; at the honest parents, with their delighted children laughing and clap- ping their hands at the show ; at the poor outcasts, whose laughter was less innocent though perhaps louder, and who brought their shame and their youth here, to dance and be merry till the dawn at least, and to get bread and drown care. Of this sympathy with all conditions of men, Arthur often boasted ; he was pleased to possess it, and said that he hoped thus to the last he should retain^ it. As another man has an ardour for art or music, or natural science, Mr Pen said that anthropology was his favourite pursuit, and had his eyes always eagerly opened to its infinite varieties and beauties ; contemplating with an unfailing delight all specimens of it in all places to which he resorted, whether it was the coquet- 1 70 Transcripts and Studies. ting of a wrinkled dowager in a ballroom or a high-bred young beauty blushing in her prime there ; whether it was a hulking guardsman coaxing a servant-girl in the park — or innocent little Tommy that was feeding the ducks while the nurse listened. And, indeed, a man whose heart is pretty clean can indulge in this pur- suit with an enjoyment that never ceases, and is only perhaps the more keen because it is secret and has a touch of sadness in it ; because he is in his mood and humour lonely, and apart although not alone." Over against which there is the author's manly warning : — " If seeing and acknowledging the lies of the world, Arthur, as see them you can with only too fatal a clearness, you submit to them without any protest farther than a laugh; if, plunged yourself in easy sensuality, you allow the whole wretched world to pass by you unmoved ; if the fight for the truth is taking place, and all men of honour are on the ground armed on the one side or the other, and you alone are to lie on your balcony and smoke your pipe out of the noise and the danger — you had better have died, or never been at all, than such a sensual coward." But Arthur has ready a reply which serves his purpose at least for the moment. At a time when there is no dominant faith, no rule of life, no compelling ardour, no ordered, marching army of men where each one of us may fall into the ranks and obey his leader's command, what more natural than that the individual, oppressed by a sense of his own powerlessness, should come to terms with the world, and should compensate himself as a suborned revolter by irony and satire. The worst evil is that such a com- promise with the world breeds a spirit of fatalism and saps the force of the will ; to yield to circumstance, to accept one's environment seems inevitable ; and men forget that in every complex condition of life we are Victorian Literature. lyi surrounded by a hundred possible environments, and that it lies with ourselves to choose whether we shall see our neighbours over the way, or an encompassing great cloud of witnesses who gather and gaze around us. Thackeray had not the austerity and lonely strength needful for a prophet ; he would not be a pseudo-pro- phet ; therefore he chose his part — to remain in the world, to tolerate the worldlings, and yet to be their adversary and circumventer, or at least a thorn in their sides. Two men, whose influence extends over the full half-century, of whom one happily remains among us still, were true nineteenth-century sons of the prophets, who would make no compromises, and each in his own way lifted up a solitary voice crying repentance and terror and judgment to come. " In Oriel Lane," writes the late Professor of Poetry at Oxford, Principal Shairp, " light-hearted undergraduates would drop their voices and whisper, ' There's Newman !' when, head thrust for- ward, and gaze fixed as though on some vision seen only by himself, with swift, noiseless step he glided by. Awe fell on them for a moment as if it had been some apparition that had passed." And another Oxford Pro- fessor of Poetry, Mr Matthew Arnold, writes in a like strain : " Who could resist the charm of that spiritual apparition, gliding in the dim afternoon light through the aisles of St Mary's, rising into the pulpit, and then, in the most entrancing of voices, breaking the silence with words and thoughts which were a religious music — subtle, sweet, mournful ? 1 seem to hear him still, saying : ' After the fever of life, after wearinesses and sicknesses, fightings and despondings, languor and fretfulness. 172 Transcripts and Studies. struggling and succeeding ; after all the changes and chances of this troubled, unhealthy state, — at length comes death, at length the white throne of God, at length the beatific vision.' " Mr Arnold dwells on the charm and magic of the preacher's person and manner, because for him the na,me of Cardinal Newman is a great name to the imagination, but the solution adopted by Newman for the doubts and difficulties which beset men's minds to-day, " to speak frankly, is impossible." They alone could feel the full force of Newman's words who believed that he spoke to them of the most glorious and the most awful of all realities. He stood in the pulpit of St Mary's to tell of a hidden life which is the only veritable life of man ; to tell of an invisible world which is more real, intimate, and enduring than the world of the senses. Once in the year this visible earth manifests its hidden powers ; "then the leaves come out, and the blofesoms on the fruit-trees and flowers, and the grass and corn spring up. There is a sudden rush and burst outwardly of that hidden life which God has lodged in the material world." So it shall be one day with the invisible world of light and glory — when God gives the word. "A, world of saints and angels, a glorious world, the palace of God, the mountain of the Lord of Hosts, the heavenly Jerusalem, the throne of God and Christ, all these won- ders, everlasting, all-precious, mysterious, and incompre- hensible lie hid in what we see. What we see is the outward shell of an eternal kingdom, and on that king- dom we fix the eyes of our faith. Shine forth, O Lord, as when on Thy Nativity Thine Angels visited the Victorian Literature. 173 shepherds ; let Thy glory blossom forth as bloom and foliage oa the trees ; change with Thy mighty power this visible world into that divine world, which as yet we see not ; destroy what we see, that it may pass and be transformed into what we believe." Newman and those who thought with him had little friendly feeling for the Puritans of the seventeenth cen- tury. It was noted by Clough in 18-38 that assent could hardly be obtained at Oxford to an assertion of Milton's greatness as a poet. Yet Newman was indeed in one sense, and a very real sense, a Puritan of the nineteenth century. He rose in the pulpit of St Mary's not only to rebuke the worldliness of the world but to protest against the religion of the day, which had dropped one whole side of the Gospel — its austere character ; which included " no true fear of God, no fervent zeal for his honour, no deep hatred of sin, no horror at the sight of sinners, no indignation and compassion at the blas- phemies of heretics, no jealous adherence to doctrinal truth, no especial sensitiveness about the particular means of gaining ends, if only the ends be good, no loyalty to the Holy Apostolic Church of which the Creed speaks, no sense of the authority of religion as external to the mind — in a word, no, seriousness." These are the words of .a Puritan — a Puritan who was also a Catholic, and here lay his power with higher minds in an age which had yielded to the sapping in of material influences, which had grown soft and self-indulgent, and which ' was bewildered by confused voices that seemed only to announce an intellectual anarchy. " My battle," Newman writes, " was with Liberalism ; by Liberalism J 74 Transcripts and Studies. I meant the anti-dogmatic principle and its de- velopments." Peace of mind and a cheerful counten- ance are indeed the gifts of the gospel, hut they should follow zeal and faith ; they should follow a recognition of the severe aiid terrible side of religion. " I will not shrink from uttering my firm conviction/' said Newman, " that it would be a gain to this country were it vastly more superstitious, more bigoted, more gloomy, more fierce in its religion, than at present it shows itself to be. Not, of course, that I think the tempers of mind herein implied desirable, which would be an evident absurdity, but I think them in6nitely more desirable and more promising than a heathen obduracy, and a cold, self-sufficient, self-wise tranquillity." The vital ques- tion with Newman, as he himself has said, was "How were we to keep the Church from being liberalised." And the final answer was given in his own action — by accepting all truth, like a per- plexed child, from the lips of the Queen of Saints, the Holy Roman Church, the mother of us all. " I come," he might have exclaimed, like Charles Reding of his own " Loss and Gain," " 0, mighty Mother, I come, but I am far from home. Spare me a little ; I come with what speed I may, but I am slow of foot, and not as others, mighty Mother." In the divine darkness of her bosom there was rest. Those who look upon Newman's solution of the difficulties of our time as an impossible solution need hardly trouble themselves with his singular reasonings. The title of the fifth chapter of his " Autobiography," " Position of my mind since 1845," will suffice — as if during half of a long lifetime Victorian Literature. 175 a position were desirable for a thinking being rather than a progress. "From the time that I became a Catholic, of course I have no further history of my religious opinions to narrate." Of course : for the mighty mother laid her hand across the child's weary eyes, soothed him to rest with her immemorial croon, and while he slept removed the hand and fixed her bandage in its place. Yet we heretics, for whose blasphemies the zealous champion of the faith must needs feel compassion and indignation, may win from his teaching something better even than its charm and its culture ; we may win a quickened sense of the reality of the invisible world, and a more strenuous resolution to live with the loins girt and the lamp lit. A young Protestant heretic from America, who prized at their true worth Cardinal Newman's " Verses on Various Occasions," took courage one day and sent a copy of that volume to the Oratory at Birmingham, with a request for the writer's autograph. It was returned with the inscription, Viriliter age, exspectans Bominum, — words containing in little Newman's best contribution to his time ; his vivid faith in a spiritual world, and the call to his fellows in an age of much material ease and prosperity to rise and quit them like men. Our second prophet was laid to rest six years since under the green turf of Ecclefechan. A tomb of the prophet was built — built it may be with untempered mortar; and since then the amusement of his country- men has been to pull out one stone and another, or to scribble on their surface caricatures and insolent verses. Carlyle's prime influence was a religious one ; he was 1 76 Transcripts and Studies. a preacher before he was a critic or au historian. James Carlyle, one of " the fighting masons of Ecclefechan," not only could lay the stones straight and firm, but, as a member of the Relief Church, had doubtless a Scottish clearness and vigour in matters of the faith, and, we are informed, loved to read old books which told of Refor- mation times and the deeds of the Covenanters. It was intended that Thomas, his eldest son, should be a minis- ter of the Church. A brilliant French critic has called Carlyle a Puritan, and Carlyle himself described Puritan- ism as "the last of our Heroisms." His heritage of faith was indeed transformed, but it was never cast away. To view life, at times sadly, at times sternly, and always seriously, is the Puritan habit, and it was Carlyle's, only relieved by the sudden tenderness of his heart, aad by his humour as an artist, often almost Aristophanic, before which the whole world would appear in a moment as a huge farce-tragedy. To bear about with us an abiding sense of the infinite issues of human existence is a part of Puritanism. Poor, indeed, is this little life of man for pleasure or for pride ; yet of measureless worth, since heaven and hell environ it. Each deed, each moment is related to Eternity. God and the devil, one at odds with the other, are not names, but terrible realities ; righteousness and sin stand apart from one another by the whole diameter. On whose side does each of us find himself? The many are foolish, slumbering and sleeping, hearing no cry in the night. The wise are few, ever ready, with the loins girt and the lamp lit. But Puritanism, in its desire to fortify the moral will. Victorian Literature. 177 contracts the sensibilities, impoverishes the affections, averts its gaze from half of nature and of human life. How is one of stormy sensibility, to whom all of life is dear, an artist and a poet, a lover of beauty, a lover of strength even when ill-regulated, full of tenderness, pity, wrath ; full also, in this new century, of new aspiring thoughts and impulses of revolt — how is such an one to be a Puritan ? By his twenty-first year it had become clear to Carlyle that if he were to be a preacher he must preach another gospel than that of the Presbyterian Kirk. And in due time the authentic voice, calling him to be " a writer of books," grew audible. He must preach, if at all, through literature. A broad way in literature for men of passionate temper -had been opened by Byron. His victories had followed one another so brilliantly, so rapidly, that only one other career seemed like his — that of Napoleon. He had revolted against a society of decencies and re- spectability, of social hypocrisies, and moral cant ; and with that revolt Carlyle sympathised. He had known the fever of a deep unrest ; he had been miserable among negations and extinct faiths ; with such unrest, such misery, Carlyle was not unacquainted. In Byron he recognised a certain desperate sincerity, underlying all superficial insincerities. Yet for one who had learnt that " man's chief end is to glorify God," who had heard of obedience to a divine will, of service to a divine King, Byron's egoistic revolt, though of service as a pro- test against the false, seemed to go but a little way towards attaining the liberty of true spiritual manhood. Is no better way possible ? Is a religious freedom un- M 1 78 Transcripts and Studies. attainable ? Is it possible to be "a clear and universal man," and at the same time a man of faith ? Carlyle, like Teufelsdrockh, closed his Byron ; like Teufelsdrockh, he opened his Goethe. And in Goethe he found his own problem and the problem of his time solved. " The question," he writes in his essay on Goethe's works, " Can man still live in devoutness, yet without blind- ness or contraction ; in unconquerable steadfastness for the right, yet without tumultuous exasperation against the wrong ; an antique worthy, yet with the expansion and increased endowment of a modern ? is no longer a question, but has become a certainty and ocularly visible fact." Puritanism had said " Live resolutely for God in what is good," but Puritanism had narrowed the mean- ing of the word " good " as Carlyle henceforth could not narrow it ; Puritanism had renounced the experiment of entering the kingdom of heaven otherwise than maimed and blind. Goethe said, " Live resolutely a complete human life, in what is good and beautiful, in the whole of things " — /m Qanze.n, Guten, Schonen resolut zu leben. So the seriousness which is at the heart of Puritanism might grow large, and free, and beautiful. What Carlyle wrote of Goethe was not the mere expres- sion of a literary judgment ; he wrote with the sense that it was Goethe who had made it possible for him to live. He did not approach Goethe, like poor Sterling, with questions as to his classification — Was Goethe a Pagan, or a Christian ? a Pantheist, or perchance a " Pot-theist " ? He found, or thought he found, in Goethe a complete, heroic, modern man. " Carlyle Victorian Literature. 1 79 breakfasted with me," wrote Crabb Robinson in 1832, " and I harl an interesting morning with him. . . . His voice and manner, and even the style of his conversation, are those of a re- ligious zealot, and he keeps up that character in his declamations against the anti-religious. And yet, if not the god of his idolatry, at least he has a priest and prophet of his church in Goethe, of whose profound wisdom he speaks like an enthusiast. But for him, Carlyle says, he should not now he alive. He owes everything to him!" Those were days of steadfast growth in the moorland solitude of Craigenputtoch, when, having conquered the egoistic despair of youth, and found in renunciation and a wise limited activity his " Everlasting Yea," Carlyle moved with a free, courageous step through untrodden regions of literature, and was for a time a prophet of joy and hope. He talked to De Quincey of founding a " Misanthropic Society ,"i its members uniting to " hurl forth their defiance, pity, expostulation over the whole universe, civil, literary, and religious." But in truth he was no Timon ; around him was the solitude which nourished his soul — " a solitude altogether Druidical — grim hills tenanted chiefly by wild grouse, tarns and brooks that have soaked and slumbered un- molested since the deluge of Noah, and nothing to disturb you with speech, except Arcturus and Orion, and the Spirit of Nature, in the heaven and in the earth, as it manifests itself in anger or love, and utters its inexplicable tidings, unheard by the mortal ear." But, adds this misanthrope, " the misery is the almost total want of colonists." Yet, when he returned to his fireside, there was sufficient human society in the wife, whose " soft invincibility, capacity of discernment, and noble loyalty of heart," were, in spite of all imperfections 1 8o Transcripts and Sltidies. of sympathy, to stand him in stead during forty years ; in her, and in that pile upon his library table, eyed with the pride of a young literary athlete — " such a quantity of German periodicals and mystic speculation, embosomed in plain Scottish Peat-moor, being nowhere else that I know of to be met with." In temperament Carlyle differed widely from his master, Goethe. When he came from his northern soli- tude to London his age was the same as that of Goethe in the year of his return from Italy to Weimar. In solitude or congenial society, freed from the multifarious cares of a great public servant, delivering his heart from the exaltation of an ideal passion which could not transform itself into duty and happiness nor into crea- tive activity, surrounded by the marble aristocracy of antique art, Goethe in Eome attained a serenity of vision and a comprehensive definiteness of purpose which some have described as resulting in a cooling or chilling of his genius. Carlyle, combative as a son of one of " the fighting masons of Ecclefechan " must needs be, with stormy sensitiveness pained by all the griefs and wrongs and follies of the time, lost such serenity as had been his in his moorland home, saw in tempestuous vision the old Puritan conflict between the powers of hell and heaven renewing itself in our modern world, and could not choose but show forth his vision, announce the woes that were coming on the earth, and declare, to those who had ears to hear, the almost impossible way of salvation for society. " The savageness which has come to be a main characteristic of this singular man is, in my opinion," wrote Harriet Martineau, " a mere ex- Victoria7t Literature. 18 r pression of his intolerable sympathj'- -witb the suffering." Goethe's wide and luminous view is, like that of Shak- spere in his last period, a gazing down upon human life from some clear outpost on the heights. Carlyle, with marred visage and rent prophetic robe, is hurtled hither and thither in the tumult of the throng. From the prophets we do not get the axiomata media of wise living, individual or social. They tell of right- eousness, mercy, and judgment to come. Others of trained intelligence must apply their doctrine to life. Carlyle helped to make us feel that the chasm between truth and falsehood, between right and wrong, is sheer aud of infinite depth ; that all things do not of necessity tend from bad to good ; that, on the contrary, bad often grows to worsen that a nation, by faithlessness and folly, may indeed go straight to the devil ; that each bit of neeciful work done soundly, honestly, contri- butes to avert that catastrophe. This was an awaken- ing piece of nineteenth-century prophecy. But how to find the truth ? how to distinguish, in the complex material of life, between good and evil ? how to attain the right ? Worship of heroes (sometimes of question- able heroism), government by the Best (but where to find them ?), drilling of Democracy (which will surely drill itself in the only effectual ways) — these suggestions did not greatly serve to make our path clear. The patient intellect of man had pursued other methods leading to other results. These were indignantly ex- ploded by our transcendental prophet as the manufacture of logic-mills, fragments of the Dismal Science, leavings of the Pig Philosophy, wisdom of National Palaver, and 1 82 Transcripts and Studies. such like. Happily, it was among the elemental forces of ir dividual character that Carlyle wrought with chief power ; his influence, therefore, without losing its virtue, could submit to manifold transformations. Carlyle's transcendentalism was part of the spirit of his time, part of the reaction moral, intellectual, and imaginative against the eighteenth century. The Car- lylean transceadentalism derived its unique character from the Scottish Peat-moor, " Druidical Solitude," " speech