LIBRARY ANNEX 2 DRAWING FOR ART STUDENTS AND ILLUSTRATORS ALLEN W. SEABY CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY FINE ARTS LIBRARY 3 1924 075 072 235 Cornell University Library The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924075072235 DRAWING FOR ART STUDENTS AND ILLUSTRATORS Jro>!fispiere. A brilliant chalk drawing by Corregio. The modelling is broad and sharp accents of dark have been avoided. The downward direction of the strokes from right to left should be noted, the simplest movement for a right-handed person. DRAWING FOR ART STUDENTS AND ILLUSTRATORS BY ALLEN W. SEABY LONDON : B. T. BATSFORD, LTD., 94, HIGH HOLBORN. PRINTED BY JOHN HIGHAM & COY. LTD, HYDE, MANCHESTER. PREFACE. In the first place I must offer humble apologies to my students, past and present, whose failings I have so ruthlessly exploited for my own purpose. They will, I trust, pardon me for holding them up as horrid examples rather than shining lights. Next I must tender my acknowledgments to my master and friend, Mr. F. Morley Fletcher, to whom I owe everything in art, and especially for his teaching, as I understand it, of the use of expressive line. I have to thank Prof. Edith Morley for reading a yery untidy manuscript, and Mr. C. C. Pearce, A.R.B.A., for suggestions. I must also thank Mr. A. S. Hartrick, R.W.S., for allowing me to reproduce two Paris life studies (figs. i6 and 25A), Mr. E. S. Lumsden, R.E., for several drawings (figs. 18, 28 and 44), Miss Dorothy Johnston (figs. 21 and 31 a), Mr. C. C. Pearce (fig. 12), Mr. H. Hampton (fig. 43), Miss Agnes Forbes and other students for various drawings and sketches which are only intended to serve as indications of method. My thanks are also due to the Hon John Fortescue, of the Royal Library, Windsor Castle, for permission to reproduce the Holbein drawings, to the British Museum authorities, and to Mr. W. B. Paterson, who obtained Mr. W. A. Coats' consent to use his Crawhall drawing. The line blocks, as can be seen, are mere scribbled diagrams with no pretence to draughtsmanship. Lastly, in a book planned as this is, there must necessarily be a certain amount of repetition. Perhaps this is not altogether bad for the student ; as all teachers know, important matters need more than one telling. A. W. SEABY. University College, Reading. April, 192 1. CONTENTS. Chapter Page I. INTRODUCTION I II. THE BIAS OF VISION 7 III. PROPORTION 13 IV. TYPE FORMS 22 V. CONSTRUCTION 30 VI. TONE STUDY— PRELIMINARY . 34 VII. TONE STUDY— EXERCISES . 38 VIII. THE FIGURE— INTRODUCTORY . 49 IX. THE FIGURE— THE SEARCH FOR FORM . . 61 X. THE FIGURE— TIME SKETCHING . 73 XI. RELATED FIGURES . 80 XII. EDGE STUDY . 85 XIII. ARTISTIC ANATOMY . 94 XIV. DRAWING ON TONED PAPER . lOI XV. EARLY AND MODERN REPRESENTATION OF FORM 103 XVI. DRAWING FROM MEMORY . 107 XVII. ANIMALS. . 118 XVIII. LANDSCAPE . 128 XIX. PLANT FORM . 133 XX. DRAWING AS A PREPARATION FOR PAINTING 140 XXI. CONVENTION 151 XXII. DRAWING FOR ILLUSTRATORS 161 XXIII. THE DRAWINGS OF THE MASTERS i66 CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION. In these days, when daily prophecies are made con- cerning the art work required in the near future, in the shape of pattern and costume designing, poster and advertisement work, illustration, etc., when one sees in the press a great campaign of correspondence teaching with the promise of remunerative employment to every student who "completes the course," with the implication that no long training in art study is necessary, and that there is a royal road to art, it becomes necessary to insist upon the importance of draughtsmanship in the classical sense, as understood by Holbein, Velasquez, Ingres, Menzel, and Degas. This technical power or faculty, call it what we will, is not a conjuring trick, a mere sleight-of-hand to be learned as a series of "tips," but must be acquired, if at all, by severe training, and by intellectual visual effort. It must be searched for rather than picked up, and learned from one whom the student trusts, putting himself in his teacher's hands with con- fidence, not regarding him as one standing behind a counter ready for a fee to cut off a small snip of the fabric of art teaching, to show, say, how tricks with a water 2 DRAWING FOR ART STUDENTS. colour brush are performed, or how to draw a pretty face. When the student has arrived at some measure of the knowledge of art, he will press into his service all the refinements of technique which he can acquire from any one who can teach him, but without that, he is the more a charlatan, the more dodges and manipulative processes he can command. The following chapters, therefore, are concerned with drawing as a study, and an attempt is made in them to emphasize the importance of a student-like attitude of mind, and a wise docility in carrying out tasks not perhaps in themselves very interesting, but necessary if the draughtsman is to be well equipped. Nor should readers cavil at such a term as "tasks," for though the emotional side of art is now-a-days insisted upon, and rightly so, yet it is all the more necessary that the artist shall be absolutely the master of his instrument, if he is to possess the souls of his listeners. And if this striving and study is necessary in music, still more is it in pictorial art. On the other hand the study of drawing cannot proceed without the active interest of the pupil. The notion still lingers that drawing is a discipline, that students should be made to 'do it because they do not like it. But when the eye loses its interest and pertin- acity, a particular drawing is better laid aside, for further work will resolve itself into tinkering, embroider- ing or stippling, mere occupation without observation. If the study has been made on right lines, if placing, proportion, movement and construction have been grappled with, the drawing has earned its place in the INTRODUCTION. 3 Stairway of art study, for it has raised the student a step above his previous attempts. A real responsibility rests on the student, who should ascertain for himself how far he can take a drawing, though the art teacher can do much to help him by exhortation and even example. Many students are slow to recognise the necessity of testing their powers of observation and expression in any one drawing; some artists have only forced themselves to this long after their school days were over, as witness Degas, who shut himself up for two years while he searched his powers of observation to the utmost in pro- ducing his exquisitely finished pictures of Paris street life. After some experience of teaching drawing it seems to the writer that certain essentials of study, not only perhaps in drawing, but in all art are : — (i) the develop- ment of the sense of proportion, and by this is meant more than getting one's measurements right, but a feel- ing for good proportions, such as is generally admitted was innate in the Italians to a higher degree than in the northern peoples, and the reason lies at hand, for the former never lost touch with the classic canons of pro- portion, while the architecture and sculpture, which formed their environment, showed them proportion embodied. (2) Hardly less important is the quality of sincerity, of being oneself, of not apeing another's style. Art Students, from their very temperament, are quickly impressed, not least by the work of the cleverer students. Later on they follow the manner of their master or of artists they admire. There is not much harm in this up to a certain point, and indeed art tradition has been built 4 DRAWING FOR ART STUDENTS. up in some such way. On the other hand the student with character and individuality, while showing in his work admiration for others, will feel within himself a wish to follow his bent, to do things his own way. From this comes character, a quality in art work, which is spontaneous, and not to be striven for consciously. As for "style," that comes only to a few, and an art teacher has to leave it out of his calculations, happy if years after, the work of a former pupil is seen to possess that elusive and rare quality. But one can show one's students to some extent what style means in drawing; the rhythmical line of Botticelli, Ingres and the Oriental masters, the veracity and clarity of Holbein, the structural drawing of Durer, to name only a few masters. Certainly every school should have reproductions of drawings by masters, early and modern, not in order to frighten students, or even that they should copy them, but to instil into their minds the qualities that the best drawings possess. The student should study such reproductions, or better still, the actual drawings in the British Museum, at Oxford and elsewhere. He will see that each master has a rhythm peculiar to himself, not only a conscious rhythm, such as the marshalling of the masses as we see in Rembrandt's Hundred Guilder print, with their pyramidal or wave-like forms, all leading to the central group, or a similarly conscious effort to achieve a calligraphic flow of line as seen in the Chinese and Japanese masters; but a sub-conscious rhythmical stroke or accent, by which we know the artist as we might recog- nise him by his handwriting. The ample curves of INTRODUCTION. S Rubens, the sweet flowing line of Guercino, the staccato rhythm of Fragonard, the square cut forms of Rembrandt, as seen in his brush drawings, are examples. But this rhythmical movement of the hand cannot be taught, and the student should not consciously strive for it, or he may acquire not rhythm, but merely a mannered touch. Composition has been dealt with incidentally, but this is a subject which demands full treatment, while the following chapters are concerned with how to draw. In practice, however, the two are interwoven, and as com- position comprehends all the subjects of art study it stands easily first, and should be given a corresponding position in any art curriculum. Too long has art teaching been concerned with mere imitation, whereas the first stroke on a sheet of paper involves attention to other things. It implies a choice, for it fixes the dimensions, determines the placing and the movement ; in other words the first steps of a drawing have to do not so much with imitation as composition. It might be put this way, that the student who studies art mainly through composition and allied subjects will draw well enough, while the student who does nothing but copy may miss the very kernel of his art. The opening sentences of this introduction show that the writer is on the side of those in authority who advocate sustained effort as against slick sketching. It happens that he has had to deal with art students from all parts of Britain, and from abroad, and of but few could it be said that they had been put upon the right road, that ideas of proportion, of construction, and of 6 DRAWING FOR ART STUDENTS. movement had been steadfastly pressed upon them, and he has reluctantly come to the conclusion that the teach- ing of drawing is often wanting in clearness, that what may be called the rudiments — ^how to set about a draw- ing, how to carry out the successive stages, have not been inculcated. Too often the student shows by his muddling attempts that he has not been taught to draw, and this applies with equal force to the more brilliant students. This is a serious matter, and no number of gold medals for overworked, or, on the other hand, tricky drawings, will put the matter right. The kindness of heart which fears to criticize with faithfulness is cruelty in the end, for students are often so wrapped in their own manner of work and way of seeing that only the plainest speaking will shake them free. Of course no teacher can command "good" drawing from his pupils, but their work shows clearly enough what sort of teaching they have received. Perhaps a great part of the truth lies in this, that the teacher may be thinking more of the drawing than of the pupil, more anxious for the successful completion of the work than that the student should proceed by logical and artistic steps. A study abandoned because of wrong method may lose a medal, but it may be for the student's welfare, for while a drawing may be tinkered into shape, may be "pulled out of the fire," yet during the process the student is learning to draw badly, to attach importance to dodges and contrivances for making a bad drawing appear better than it is. CHAPTER II. THE BIAS OF VISION. For good or ill the invention of perspective gave an enormous impetus to art study, as distinct from practical apprenticeship in the studio or workshop. When the science is held to include reflections and the representa- tion of shadows, it occupies the same field as that study we call Drawing. Photography, erroneous as is its perspective, judged by human eye standards, gave a fresh lease of life to the subject, or as the Post- Impressionists would put it, riveted the perspective fetters yet more firmly on pictorial art. That is to say, the study of form in the Art School is necessarily based upon appearances, and at once the art student parts company with his brother in the street who has an absolute contempt for appearances in the sense in which the term is here used. In order to establish the relation between reality and experience gained by the eye one may observe as far as it be poss- ible an infant's visual sensations. Shortly after birth it evidently notices a light as marked by the movement of the eyes and head. A little later it tries to reach brightly coloured objects presented to it (as the saying 8 DRAWING FOR ART STUDENTS. is, it cries for the moon), and the observer will note how tentative and uncertain are its efforts, the difficulty it has in reaching with its hand the exact position of the object. If with one eye closed small objects are picked up from the table, the adult will appreciate the infant's difficulty, for with this handicap it is not easy to estimate the exact distance the hand has to travel to grasp the object. The child has perforce to continue its investigations. It hurts itself by knocking against objects, or falling over them, until by dint of practice and sad experience it has become at a quite early age what may be called "distance perfect." It has learned to look into space as compared with the artist's way of looking at space. This power of measuring distances is essential to the preservation of life, and the knowledge is being used throughout our waking moments. From the appearance of things the actual is reconstructed. Hence a Philistine, sub-conscious contempt for appearances, for light and shade, change of colour caused by shadows or distance, and apparent changes of form owing to foreshortening. To the non-artist these are illusions, deceptions making the daily walk in life more difficult perhaps, but easily to be overcome by wariness, by the determination not to confound the "shadow" with the substance. Hence the teacher finds that all beginners make their drawings, in a sense, too like the object; their ellipses are nearer the circle, and their horizontal surfaces wider, than the position of the object warrants. Again, every art teacher knows that in a junior class THE BIAS OF VISION. 9 practising object drawing, there will be at least one case where the pupil has not drawn the appearance of the object as he sees it from where he is, but as it would appear if he were in another position. Sometimes two drawings of an object may be found almost identical in appearance, yet made by students several feet apart. In this case the student, who has evidently expended some intellectual energy in thus projecting himself into an imaginary position, does so because he feels that the view he actually has would give but an imperfect idea of the shape and function of the object, and this gives the clue to so-called errors that we see in old work. The Egyptian symbol of a man shows the head in profile, the shoulders in front view and the legs again in profile. The Assyrian bas-relief makes the king twice the size of his attendants, while the mediaeval illustrator causes his hero to appear several times in the same picture among houses, trees, etc., rather less in height than himself. Children, for the same reason, depict a profile view of a face with a front view of the eye, and often add another eye, nose and mouth as well, or they depict both ends of a house in one drawing. In all these cases appearance is ignored. The delineator is obsessed by realities, and is occupied in presenting the largest possible content of the objects depicted. Similarly, if an object with which a young pupil is familiar, such as a kitchen bellows, is laid upon the table as an exercise in the drawing lesson, the apparent change of shape due to foreshadowing is apt to be ignored, with the result that a view is given of the bellows in plan, with the side view tacked on as it were. The students see by 10 DRAWING FOR ART STUDENTS. a kind of mental vision, the ground plans of objects as a bird's eye view, because that imaginary position enables them to visualize objects more easily. Such draw- ing cannot be called wrong ; it merely denotes an early, and in these days of realism and photographic vision, an inconvenient convention. It is not a question of diffi- culty in the sense that the lines are intricate or hard to follow, for these may be of the easiest, but rather a misunderstanding between teacher and students, the former being concerned with the modern or sophisticated aspect of art, the latter still making use of traditional conventions. And indeed the historic art periods of greatest charm came before perspective and light and shade had been treated scientifically. One might cite the splendidly alive and characteristic animals of the Egyptians, the Greek vase forms with their linear purity, the early work of the mediaeval illuminators, Chinese and Japanese drawing, and the detailed vision of the naturalistic painters of the quattrocento. In all these periods the ,vision was artistic, and triumphed over inconsistencies of representation as judged by later standards. Consideration of this deference to the claims of reality enables the art teacher to appreciate the difficulties his students have in grappling with the figure. Beginners make the head too large for the body, the face too big for the skull ; the hair like string or wire, pre-occupied as they are with realities, which cannot be compassed on a plane surface. Their vision may be said to be anthropo- morphic, for they regard everything from the human standpoint. A house at the end of a long avenue of THE BIAS OF VISION. ii trees, for instance, is likely to be drawn much larger than it appears, because it is the home of man, and as such is unconsciously emphasized. In this connexion it may be noted that there are no sucH beings as pupils totally untrained in drawing, for all have been taught to draw in early childhood, but by means of a series of recipes or symbols. How to draw a man, horse, tree, etc., are questions freely asked by children with the expectation of an immediate ready- made answer. In later stages of drawing practice these old symbols or images re-appear, and hide or fog the object set before the students, who often draw, not what they see, but the object coloured or biassed by this sub- conscious image of long ago which, as it were, they behold with an inner eye simultaneously with their vision of what is before them. This sub-conscious image plays strange pranks with the drawing. Sometimes the student substitutes his own features and physical proportions for those of the model, or may be the features of the previous sitter appear on the drawing. Students' figure drawings often betray to an amusing extent the type they fancy in the opposite sex, while equally common is the inability to portray an alien racial type. The usual Italian model is transformed into a square-profiled Englishman. When one looks for it, "the English look" on students' draw- ings of foreign models is quite ludicrous. The physiognomy of even an allied race like the Dutch is absolutely differentiated from that of the English type. 12 DRAWING FOR ART STUDENTS. Much concentrated observation and searching for the accents which make up this differentiation of race forms, are needed. The student has to teach himself to get, as it were, outside his own personality, in which a young person is often impregnably intrenched, and subordinate himself to his model. He has to set himself free from these sub-conscious, anthropomorphic fetters already alluded to. Perhaps the only way to achieve this is through sympathy with his subject. Too often students barely consider the model as a human being; they are quick to find some variation in the pose from what they saw before, and hasten to correct it, very much as they would alter a lay figure. Apart then from dealing with faults of construction and proportion the teacher's chief difficulty is to get students outside themselves. The well-being of most young people, their exuberant vitality, their good spirits and freedom from care, make it difficult for them to visualize other than in terms of their own personality. In other words artists begin to see more truly as the illusions of youth pass from them; they at length see things as they are. CHAPTER III. PROPORTION. To give the student some idea of the meaning of proportion should be the teacher's early aim, and it will entail endless teaching, for when proportion is felt, as well as measured, little more will be left to teach. The teachers of the humanities claim that their studies give a sense of proportion in human affairs. The art teacher may also contend that the practice of draw- ing, rightly pursued, leads to the same end, that a child who has made a well proportioned drawing has begun to develop the sense of proportion, a step towards the build- ing up of the good citizen, who looks at affairs with a steady eye. Exercises which otherwise might develop the sense of proportion are often smothered by rules. Students are coached assiduously in the number of times the head measures into the body, or in constructions in- volving middle lines, or in blocking out details in squares or triangles, while traces of the once elaborate scaffold- ings of verticals and horizontals with which students used to commence a drawing may yet be found. As Mr. Water Sickert once wrote, "There are too many props introduced to help the student, with the 13 14 DRAWING FOR ART STUDENTS. result that the edge of observation is somewhat blunted." The same may be said of perspective, the formal rules of which, hastily learned by rote, tend to atrophy the powers of observation. Students sometimes seem to think that so long as receding parallels are made to vanish somewhere, all is done that need be expected of them, with the result that on looking at the drawing we see it to be merely a travesty of the forms of what has been placed before the eye. The writer once visited a school with some students training to become teachers, to watch the drawing lesson. Some children were drawing a box placed before the class, and at the close of the lesson the students were asked to pick out the best drawing. Papers were handed in showing some knowledge of perspective rules, and there was a chorus of dissent when the writer showed the drawing he had chosen, for not a single line was in correct perspective. But it had the right proportions, it looked like the box, whereas the other drawings were too long or too high. Of course the student can always ascertain the propor- tions by measurement, but the appeal to be fruitful must be mainly to the eye. The living model, whether draped or nude, affords practice in proportion readily appreciated by students, for they know people best, and are familiar with their own build and proportions. What are known as common objects do not, to the same extent, develop in the student this, critical faculty. Most junior students calmly make extensive alterations in vases, etc., without any qualms of conscience, while, out of doors, such objects as trees make still less appeal PROPORTION. IS to the sense of proportion, for they are assumed by the beginner to have no contour or shape, and are accord- ingly hacked and chopped about to fit them within the limits of the paper. With junior pupils "drawing a middle line as a com- mencement causes misproportion, the drawing almost invariably being too wide. Sometimes bad proportions result from the anthro- pomorphic bias. Young students generally draw the hands and feet too small, because small hands and feet are thought to be becoming. On the other hand they make the face too large for the head because it occupies a corresponding share of their attention. But to a great extent this neglect of proportion arises from bad method, which goes along with confused vision. The drawing is often begun at the top and worked downwards, the student trusting to his luck to get the whole on the paper. Hence the legs get crowded into less than their share of the space, or the feet perhaps have to be omitted. Too often the student proceeds in a random way which positively stultifies feeling for proportion. One often sees drawings slipping off the paper, as it were, or pushed to right or left, without artistic reason for so doing. Right methods will do much towards securing pro- portion. No details should be drawn at first, but a line from head to foot establishing the whole form. Every figure, every object will furnish some such line. This line once found, the proportion of the parts can proceed steadily and safely. 1 6 DRAWING FOR ART STUDENTS. The preparation of "blocking out" is often strangely- misunderstood by the student, who produces a mere scribble of the figure, full of badly scrawled detail, features, fingers and toes dashed in anyhow, and criti- cism is countered by the casual remark that the drawing is "only sketched in." Such method, or want of it, is vicious in every way. Every line from first to last should be well considered, so that at any stage the draw- ing may be workmanlike, in good proportion, and ex- pressive of the model, so far as it has been taken. Bad proportion often results from looking along the contours rather than surveying, taking in the mass of the object. An early attempt should be made to see all the figure from head to foot. One may put it in this way, that so long as beginners are pre-occupied with detail in contour, that is, with the forms, without making the necessary preparation of noting their directions, failure to secure good proportion is inevitable. Obviously one corrective is to draw the whole figure every time. The art teacher is familiar with the lying excuse of the student who for want of room omits the legs, that he did not intend to draw them. Such scraps of figures defeat one of the great aims of the study. The figure prepared or indicated, the student can then concentrate on a passage that appeals specially to him, but set out from head to foot it must be, if the exercise is to be of any value as a study in proportion, or of the action of the figure. This method gives the clue to the treatment of the vexed question of erasure. One sometimes sees a student PROPORTION. 17 rubbing out, or trying to do so, a large portion of a draw- ing at a comparatively late stage. Such alteration is mere vexation of spirit, and an acknowledgment of a bad beginning. With a studentlike and artistic com- mencement little or no erasure is necessary, for the pro- portions should be fixed by the first strokes planted upon the paper. This requires a certain firmness and patience on the part of the teacher, and a self-denial and inhibitive power not always readily at the command of the student, who comes to the study of the model with the notion that it is possible and commendable to transfer that figure bodily to the paper. For has he not seen this done in the work of the artists he most admires ? Generally the procedure is this. The beginner com- mences to draw the figure in a "blocking out" of his own fashion. Horrified at the starkness of his effort, he hurriedly covers over the first lines with detail, hoping thus to secure likeness, with the result that a figure appears represented by contour lines and looking bone- less and sawdust stuffed. Hence the necessity of the stu- dent learning what is at first alien from his thought, (pre- occupied as he is with realizing the object or figure before him), that there is a stage which comes before drawing, namely preparation, in which the placing on the paper, the proportions, and the directions of the forms have to be studied or analysed without reference to naturalistic treatment. It may be safely said that many students leave art study without having secured the discipline and training which rigorous search after a good prepara- tion alone can give. To some students it is an objection that these first 1 8 DRAWING FOR ART STUDENTS. strokes get in the way of the drawing", have to be rubbed out, spoil the paper, etc. To this one may reply that neatness is but a minor virtue in drawing study. Clean- liness has been said to come next to godliness, but it certainly lags a long way bi^ind. As a matter of fact the first strokes disappear under the later work, and if rightly placed are astonishingly useful as part of the completed study. The form comes perhaps just outside or inside the first line. In the work of the genius (?) who draws his line and his detail all "at one go," the result is seen in knotty swollen contours, mere exaggerations of the form. Students often use a sheet of paper upon which to rest their hands in order to avoid soiling their drawing. They thus compel themselves to draw piecemeal, stulti- fying their feeling for proportion, and losing the inestim- able advantage of seeing the whole of their work all the time. Many poses, especially where the figure is seated or reclining, suggest a simple pyramidal or triangular con- struction such as shown in fig. i. If the sides of the triangle are right in direction, which is easily ascertained by holding the pencil against the model and comparing with the lines on the paper, then the triangle is similar to that formed by the pose, and the proportions there- fore are correct. This enables the student to proceed with the drawing without hesitation and embarrassment ; the mind being at rest as regards the first lines undivided attention can be given to construction and artistic ex- pression. As far as possible drawings should be made sight '^~:-^SsJ ._.'i-^rS :,:■*. Fig. I — Sketches of seated or reclining figures \vho3c proportions are easily ascertained by assuming them contained in triangles. '9 -s f= I-- T3 'S u ^ OJ -r3 u o Oii .H ^ c OJ c a. CJ OJ b nj Ph -c; _u '/:; ^ ?: 'ji Ic ' <, -J " 4)i4%N \ 1\ •tei . ~-»S3k2.;-,(^Q V, X .^r *^-««sr^7^,-j»— I', ■ : '-"7 -fe'tJ F"ic.. 23. V.) # Fig. 24 — A chalk drawing li\ Wattcau. 'flic lines of the arms flow together, conlinucel hv the lines of the drapery on the lady's shoulders. One alniojt expects the lady to rise. 82 RELATED FIGURES. 83 obvious case, one figure bowed in grief, and the other bending sympathetically towards her, the lines flow together so obviously that the idea of consolation in sorrow is complete without the necessity for appropriate facial expression. The lines of the figures express the emotion. In such exercises these controlling lines must be sought for at an early stage. It is worse than useless to 'draw first one figure and then the other, for the eye is then seeing the figures detached. The combination must be looked for. (fig. 23 — 25). In such associations as two figures pulling or holding hands, the lines formed by the united arms and hands must be drawn, and the two hands as one. Two figures seated or standing with arms entwined furnish a good instance of the controlling line. The sympathetic relations of the feet should be noted, and the variations in their position. Attention should be given to the hands which in the figure in grief form a cup in which the face is held, or where clasped round the knees follow the shape of the latter, (fig. 23). Or again they form a bowl when they are used to 'drink from. These exercises may be followed by combinations of three or more figures. There is no need to wait for pro- fessional models, for pupils in turn will be ready, for a few minutes, to act their parts. Such work will enable the student to face the uncon- scious emotional gestures and combinations of real life, whether sympathetic or antagonistic. A friend once told the writer that when making 84 DRAWING FOR ART STUDENTS. Studies for' a series of compositions of wrestling, so violent were the movements that he had only time to select a contour, say pyramidal in shape, indicating the figures locked together, with perhaps a suggestion of the space between the legs. Afterwards, with the aid of models posed to fit into the sketch, the structure and detail of the wrestlers could be examined. CHAPTER XII. EDGE STUDY. If a white ball be placed before a grey background, the contour of the light side will tell against that grey. The contour of the dark side will tell also, the back- ground being a tone midway between light and dark. Then, at two points, where the light contour melts into the dark one, the outline disappears, ceases to exist to normal sight, (fig. 14). Drawings or paintings of objects can only be made to relieve, to take on roundness or solidity of appearance by following natural lighting, by noticing where the outline is lost. This is difficult to see and to represent, so accustomed are students to searching not for form, but for contours. It need hardly be discussed at this stage whether the achievement of such relief to the point of losing the sense of the flatness of the plane on which the object is 'depicted, is necessary or artistic. The really vulgar portraits in the galleries are those which the admiring public declares to be almost "coming out" of their frames. But the art student has to learn the use of all weapons. For the poster he uses the broad outline which reveals everything, but flattens it also. In these 86 DRAWING FOR ART STUDENTS. pages the student is not considered as composing, but as striving to acquire a mastery over structure and move- ment by means of the appearance, and to do this he must know how far he can go in the way of realistic treatment. Experiment will prove to the student that whenever the whole contour is clearly defined, a flatness results. If the figure is viewed with the light behind it, it shows dark and flat; if the light is behind the spectator the figure is seen all in light without shadow, and again a flat- ness results. All realistic painters have used strong light and shade , from Caravaggio onwards, and all such have made use of this melting of the contour at the half- way points. In other words a continuous outline implies an incompletely expressed figure. This paradox supplies the clue to the study of form by light and shade, in its simplest terms. The object, whether cast or living figure, should be placed before a background midway in tone between the light and dark, that is, equal in tone to the half tone of the object. Now in nature there are no outlines — only edges. Yet one must use outlines; one cannot be always smudging in backgrounds in order to reveal the form. The outline is not a part of the object, nor of the back- ground, but an imaginary line sensed by the eye, and re- presenting the degree of contrast in tone between the object and its background. This contrast can be repre- sented by a line varying in intensity or even width. The line takes the place of a more or less mechanical back- ground tone, and gives opportunity for close edge study EDGE STUDY. 87 which is practically absent where backgrounds are insisted upon. From the character of the outline it should be possible to determine the tone of the background. One can see on looking at fig. 18 that the model was posed before a low toned background, although this back- ground has been omitted intentionally. This is ex- pressed by the strength of the line where the light falls on the contour, and by the softness of that part of the contour in shade, which approached the background so nearly in tone that a clearly drawn outline would have falsified the relations. To put backgrounds behind studies of the antique or living model is to waste time better spent on edge study, and confuses drawing with painting, which consists essentially in spreading tone. Drawings by students who overlook this principle of expressive contour, have a vague indeterminate effect. The contour of the light side is often drawn timidly and faintly with the mistaken notion that any line on that side is too dark. Or worse still, a hard line is drawn all round the contour. In this case students are trying to draw the figure by itself as if it could exist without an environment, which is unthinkable. Expressive draw- ing implies not only the figure but its background. All other drawing is mere diagram making, very necessary at times, but alien to the aim in this connexion, of realising the figure as completely as direct and student-like methods will allow. The old way of simplifying the student's task was to place a white screen behind the object. This was 88 DRAWING FOR ART STUDENTS. supposed to represent the whiteness of the paper drawn upon, thus freeing the student from any trouble in regard to the background. But a moment's consideration will show that this ruined the exercise. First, the glare of the background unduly forced forward the contour in shade, which was furthest from the spectator (because generally the light is behind him, though to the left or right). Also the black- ening of the edge by contrast destroyed the effect of reflected light, which students had been taught to allow for, and still did, though they saw it not. Lastly, and most important, the emphasis of the pose is determined by the way the light falls on the figure, and this emphasis was destroyed by the white background, the contour on the light side being rendered ineffective, thus spoiling the pose, and making unity of treatment impossible. Another feature of edge study which should be men- tioned is the nature of the edge, both of the light and 'dark areas. How shall it be drawn or painted so as to express the volume of the form ? The beginner looks at the edge of an object, and puts down a line accordingly. But solidity or mass is not to be compassed in that way, for if one looks at any round object, as a flower pot, the eye is naturally attracted to the line of shade dividing the light area from the dark that is, the eye forgets to look at the contours. Hence in representing solidity, the student should follow the action of the unbiassed eye, and should not, when drawing the contours of the object, EDGE STUDY. 89 look directly at them, but at the line of shade, when these contours will at once fall out of focus and blur somewhat, Here one comes upon a very important and interest- ing controversy already mentioned, which has agitated art schools of all periods. Not seldom the student is implored to be honest; to draw what he sees, to follow nature faithfully. But before a student has worked at a drawing five minutes he finds it quite impossible to follow this advice, for the conventions of his materials, and especially the limitations of pictorial representation, restrict his efforts, and he will be wise to try to under- stand these limitations. Honesty one can rule out of the argument ; it is for greengrocers, not for artists, at least in this connexion. The immediate problem before the student is whether he shall emphasize the edges of his object, with the result that he loses the effect of roundness, the object appearing as if cut out of card, or whether he shall con- centrate on the volume of the object by blurring his edges. The primitive Italians and Netherlandish painters adopted the earlier method, and we see their work to be essentially flat in spite of much pains taken to model the form. Leonardo da Vinci, and those who followed him, have chosen to accentuate the roundness by blurring the contours. If the Venus of Velasquez in the National Gallery be examined, it will be seen that the contour of the cheek and shoulder has been brushed to and fro so that the edge is almost lost. Sir Joshua Reynolds often made edges wonderfully enveloped. Early portraits (three-quarter view), however, show the hard edge of the further cheek; consequently the 90 DRAWING FOR ART STUDENTS. nose, weakened by contrast, appears pressed against the face. If the contour of the cheek be covered by the hand, the nose at once relieves or comes forward. Holbein's lines are hard because he was drawing with the definite purpose of providing himself with exact contours from which to paint. His drawn portraits were to be translated into painted ones, and he wanted exact form. The Windsor Holbeins show the contours marked by tracing on to the canvas. The moral of all this seems to be that success in modelling form does not depend on keen eyesight. Extreme keenness of sight is often a disadvantage to young students, and not always taken into consideration by teachers, whose sight is losing its first sharpness. We see the result of powerful sight in Holman Hunt's pictures. Doubtless he saw like that, for he could dis- tinguish the moons of Jupiter with the naked eye. Fig. 1 8 shows that the contour of a figure need not consist in an unvarying line such as is produced by a piece of wire. It should be noted that the expressive- ness of the line is conditioned by the way the light falls on the contours. Students wishing to give variety and interest to their outline often accentuate it in an arbitrary way, especially where bony forms crop up, without refer- ence to the lighting. But natural lighting will give this emphasis more truly than any invented and artificial method. Judged by this standard many careful and well con- structed drawings are yet mere diagrams, because the variety of the edge is disregarded. This is seen, too, in cases as mentioned above where the contours of two 91 Fig. 2 5a — A drawing made with charcoal on Michallct. An example ot variet\' of edge treatment. 9^ EDGE STUDY. 93. forms both in light, overlap, the nearer contour being delicate and perhaps scarcely visible. These delicate,, sharp-edged contours demand the most refined handling.. Appreciation of variety of edge may be stimulated by" consideration of the dogma that "the opposite contours, of an object vary in emphasis." The fault generally- consists in drawing the contours say of a limb with lines, of the same strength. Observation will show that they- vary. Further, if two contours come together so that a Y shape occurs, the three arms of the Y are never of equal- strength ; the line of emphasis will ignore one arm, other- wise the eye would be pinned down to the meeting point of the three lines. These irregular Y's, of course, occur at many points in any pose, as armpit, neck and shoulder,, ankle, and various creasings and overlappings. CHAPTER XIII. ARTISTIC ANATOMY. Artistic Anatomy, so-called, like perspective, when ill- digested, often leads a student astray. Many draw- ings from the figure are mere anatomical diagrams, look- ing as if the model had been flayed. Fresh from their books of diagrams students search the figure for anatom- ical details. They even ask the model to tighten the knee or the armpit, so that they may mark more definitely the forms of those regions. This does not mean that anatomy should not be studied, but that it should be used as a key to the construction of the figure, rather than dis- played for its own sake.. Moody, in his "Lectures and Lessons on Art," a book now out of print, but one well worth the careful study of the art student, says : — "Intellectual work is the hardest work of all. . . . Just consider, for instance, the result of avoiding the effort necessary to master the position and details of the ankle. The want of that knowledge will probably plague you at least twice a week : it will delay your work, you will get into trouble every time you draw the figure, making altogether a sum total of annoyance, ^unsatisfactory work and feelings a hundred times 94 ARTISTIC ANATOMY. 9S greater than the expenditure of time and thought which would have been necessary to surmount the difficulty at first." First in importance is a clear knowledge of the bony framework and its articulations. It settles the move- ment and the proportions, and at the joints where the bone crops up and shows almost its actual build, it indicates the important accents of form by a squareness and clear cut shape, which must be appreciated if the drawing is to avoid wooliness. On the other hand the muscular masses fill up the gaps and suggest the first great lines of the pose. All the parts of the skeleton which determine the surface forms should be carefully studied, and especially the shoulders and hips. The former may be described as a floating girdle, for they are attached only by the collar bones (to. the notches in the breastbone), the remainder being free except for muscular and tendinous attach- ments. Hence the comparative freedom of action, while the complexity of structure, the combination of clavicle, humerus and scapula, add to the difficulty of expressing the forms. The hips, on the other hand, form a fixed girdle, firmly attached to the backbone. The two halves of the shoulder girdle can move independently, but the hip girdle moves only as a whole, like a basket tilted. When in a standing pose the hips are aslant, this means that the model is resting the weight on the leg to the side where the hip basket is higher, and therefore a vertical line 'drawn, say, through the pit of the neck, will pass through the ankle of that leg, which slants inwards in order to .support the weight. The other leg, v/hich carries little 96 DRAWING FOR ART STUDENTS. or no weight, droops with the lower side of the hips, hence the knee of that leg is lower than that of the supporting leg. And by way of compensa- tion the head and shoulders often slant in the opposite direc- tion, forming a series of radiating lines which cross the long lines of the pose at right angles, and steady it. (fig. 26). The main articulations may be reduced to their simplest terms by a diagram such as is shown in fig. i6a, similar to fig. 26. Some- thing like this construction must form the commence- ment of every drawing of the figure which has any claim to movement and structure. All the articula- tions including the should- ers are represented by cross lines. It is for want of the study of these crossings or articulations that the draw- FlG. 26. ARTISTIC ANATOMY. 97 ings of beginners look boneless and yet wooden, for they appear to have no ankles, and wrists, to say nothing of hips. It should be noted especially, and the skeleton largely supplies the reason, that these crossings of the extremities are ob- lique. This is seen clearly in the elbow and ankle. In the latter the obliquity is caused by the fact that the inner ankle is higher than the outer, a matter of the bony construction. In the elbow the slant comes from the origin of the supi- nators being higher than those of the flexors. Fig. 26 shows these slanting cross- ings at an early stage in the drawing. The point to be borne in mind is that anatom- ical construction cor- FiG. 27. roborates right procedure in drawing the figure. In poses with some degree of torsion as in fig. 27, these cross lines, all marking the bony or muscular struc- ture, radiate from a point at no great distance from the 98 DRAWING FOR ART STUDENTS. figure. The greater the movement the closer in is the point of radiation. The matter has an interest for students as showing a structural basis for the composition of line which sometimes mystifies them. They are apt to think that these rhythmical lines, whether in the direction of or across the figure, are imagined by the teacher, and a real service is rendered by showing them cause and effect. The old fashion of learning the muscles singly and detached is answerable for much of the wrongly applied anatomical drawing mentioned above. Usually they are seen in groups, and should be studied as such. Too often the only glimpse students have of the nude figure in action is when the model walks to and from the throne. A regular exercise should consist in the model moving freely at will, the students marking the changes- of form which take place. This is not a book on artistic anatomy, for which students should study the regular manuals. An anatomical detail often misinterpreted is the function of the neck muscle (sternocleido mastoid) in turning the head. When the neck muscle on the right contracts, the skull rotates, the mastoid process of the skull being brought forward, and it follows that the head is turned to the left. It is often supposed that the contraction of a sterno-cleido turns the head to that side, but observation of what takes place will correct the error. ■^«ir"»««J**«?«»i'^' Fig. 28 — A drawing with black and white chalk on gre)' Michallet paper. The reticent use of the white chalk should be noted. 99 Fjg. 20 — A drawing on blue paper with hlaclv and wliitc chalk by ]. M. Swan. The simplicity of the work should be noted and the way the white chalk is used to divide the figure into a few planes. Large areas are untouched. [British Museum. CHAPTER XIV. DRAWINGS ON TONED PAPER. Toned paper with black and white chalk is often used by painters, when making studies, for carefully- chosen, it provides a ready-made middle or half tone, and hence saves time and labour. Especially is it suit- able for drapery studies, and Lord Leighton's drawings in this medium are well known. Students of painting should use this method some- times when drawing, for it fosters modelling "in the light." With pencil or black chalk on white, as the tone of the object approaches the tone of the paper, so work has perforce to cease. That is to say, on white paper most of the modelling is done on the dark side, and the tendency is to leave the lighter tones more or less empty. Work on toned paper is concerned as much with the light passages as with the dark, and hence follows more closely the method of painting. One common error may be noted here. It is that of first making a completed drawing in black on. the toned paper, (and owing to its completeness the eye has sub- consciously disregarded the tone of the paper and assumed it to be white), afterwards using the white chalk freely for the lights, with the result that all the tones are falsified. When drawing on toned paper the figure should be lOI G2. 102 DRAWING FOR ART STUDENTS. examined in order to determine which areas may be assumed to be equivalent in tone to that of the paper. The black chalk may be used first to place the figure, to indicate the chief darks, and to suggest the main struc- ture, then the white chalk should be substituted in order to place the lights. Generally the white chalk should not touch the black (except for cases of special emphasis), a space of plain paper being left between the two, representing the tone chosen as standing for the tone of paper. Often when working on toned paper the student darkens unduly the parts approaching half tone, only finding at the close of the exercise that the tone of the paper would have sufficed. The untouched -paper is the best part of the drawing if it is in the right place and corresponds with the tones of the model, (fig. 29). In drawing from draped figures evidence should be sought of the form beneath. Beginners draw the drapery only, as if on a clothes horse. They sometimes stop short at a sleeve, having omitted the continuity of arm and hand. Even in a fully clothed figure much of the form is suggested by the planes and by the pull of the drapery from the points of support, this often result- ing in a beautiful series of radiating curves. It should be remembered that the deep parts of the folds repre- sent the figure, for there the stuff rests upon it, and these shapes should be carefully searched out. (fig. 28). A good deal of interesting matter concerning drapery will be found in Leonardo da Vinci's "Notes," and in Moody's "Lectures on Art," while the subject is dealt with in Lanteri's "Modelling," Vol. II. CHAPTER XV. EARLY AND MODERN REPRESENTATION OF FORM. If an early painting be examined, even one so late as Botticelli's Venus, certain mannerisms are noticed which are of great interest to the student of form. The painter has evidently not worked directly from the model. The treatment is "sympathetic" rather than the result of observation. He has perhaps drawn on his reminiscences of classic sculpture, or even from contemporary engravings of the nude. Judged by modern standards, there is a lack of con- struction in the figure generally, and especially is this seen in the feet, which, like those in contemporary work, never seem to stand firmly on the ground, perhaps because extreme foreshortening forbids the clear repre- sentation of all the toes, which were invariably shown. All this in no way detracts from Botticelli's beauty of line and suavity of form. He might be said to claim kinship with the Chinese and Japanese masters, so easy and fluent are his contours. Italian Art of the Trecento and Quattrocento periods exhibit generally lightly shaded forms. The expression is empirical rather than that of personal observation, a convention derived from wall painting. 103 104 DRAWING FOR ART STUDENTS. Leonardo da Vinci changed all that and formulated the rules governing the expression of form by light and shade. In his work are seen the "lines of shade" and their soft or smoky (sfumato) appearance. He was the first notable academic, and on his work the teaching of light and shade, as now taught in schools of art, was founded. Since Leonardo the study of drawing has depended upon "appearance." The photograph, essentially light and shade as it is, and simulating the endless gradations of natural lighting, has tightened the chain of tradition. Consequently students are told to be truth- ful, honest, to draw what they see, to copy nature — impossible task and misleading advice. Moral issues are needlessly dragged in. The main thing is for students to be artists. But if the test of appearance be conceded, if the object with its environment is to be represented, what are the limits of the convention which' is called drawing? First it is clear that it is quite impossible to show on a plane surface all the gradations of light occurring on a curved surface. In attempting to do so the student merely deceives himself, loses his way, and consequently all profit from his study of drawing in line and tone. The great realistic painters, such as the Dutch and the Spaniards, chose a few tones. They painted in the general tone, and into this they brushed the dark and the light tones. On the latter they placed the high light, and in the dark the reflected light. Their practice shows that these few tones are the essential ones. Drawings made with the stump are specially open to EARLY AND MODERN REPRESENTATION OF FORM. loj the objection that by continuous working, students delude themselves with the idea that they are making a complete expression of the tones of the subject, whereas the fictitious relief, apparently destroying the plane surface of the paper, is a vulgar and meretricious quality, crushing the student's powers of artistic appre- ciation. Students should understand that all drawing is a convention, and that it is impossible fully to realise any object, except by means of a trick, (the history of Art is full of instances, from the grapes of Appelles onwards), and should be urged not to cofy the object, but to express those essentials of form which they can discern. In a sense the more they try to make their drawings like, the more they cloud and confuse their artistic intelli- gence. Every drawing done should be an artistic effort, and made with artistic intention, for drawing cannot be divorced from art. This disposes at once of the old-fashioned practice of outline drawing. Outline or contour drawing, such as the outlines of ornament (with sections) drawn by art architect for a carver to follow, is a convention used pro- fessionally, but as study, pursued for long periods, it is destructive of interest in the appearance of things. Nothing written above is intended to relieve the student from the responsibility of taking his drawing as far as possible. We have only to look at the great masters, at the early work, say, of Velasquez, Rembrandt, Franz Hals, and at the drawings of Holbein, to see what an amount of eyesight they put: into their work, what an incredible amount of pains they io6 DRAWING FOR ART STUDENTS. took with mere details of dress, etc. Velasquez spent himself in studying the effect of light on homely pots and pans, to a degree which hardly any modern student has felt necessary. A friend of the writer once reported a conversation with a great living sculptor and decorator who, speaking of the modern pseudo-decorative effect obtained by the slurring of detail, declared that he would exhibit the very pores of the skin on his figures if it could be done. He meant that the most realistic mode of expression is possible in the hands of a true artist, and not only not incompatible with but enhancing the 'decorative effect he may wish to secure. CHAPTER XVI. DRAWING FROM MEMORY. Many professional artists from necessity have had to train themselves in drawing from memory long after their student days were over. The translation of the writings of Lecocq de Boisbaudran has had some share in the interest now taken by schools of art in the subject. Lecocq especially emphasized the necessity for the visual retention of a definite form, and drawing being taught in those days from flat copies, he naturally used them, thus obtaining the clear precise statement of fact which he desired. His first exercise was the outline of a nose, and from this his teaching extended over the whole field of representative and imaginative art. Memory drawing as practised at present often takes lines quite other than those of Lecocq, sometimes missing his basis of definite form. Pupils are some- times shown an object of intricate construction for a few moments, and are then expected to reproduce it from memory. They may have looked at it superficially, but they have not really examined it and made themselves thoroughly acquainted with its proportions and structure. Consequently after their memory vision has 107 io8 DRAWING FOR ART STUDENTS. become dim, they elaborate their so-called drawing from memory, with imaginary details. They must know the object intimately before they can draw it from memory; its construction, and especially its proportions, should be ascertained; it should be scrutinized from various points of view, and, if need be, handled. A class of students drawing from memory gives the art teacher some puzzling moments. The slackest art student is often found to be far ahead of his fellows in the power of visualizing, and reproduces seemingly with- out effort, while students with more developed sense of form may find the memory exercise very difficult. Galton, in his "Inquiries into Human Faculty," tells how in a "series of queries related to the illumination, definition and colouring of the mental image" addressed to "lOo men, at least half of whom were distinguished in science or in other fields of intellectual work," he asked them to visualize "the breakfast table." The answers showed that while some saw the scene perfectly clearly, in full light and colour, with the objects so sharply defined that they could, as they said, have drawn them had they the power, others experienced gaps in their memory, a dimness of illumination, an indistinctness of form, while a number would not admit that they had any power at all of vizualizing. Whether the power of drawing from memory be a "gift" or not, there is no doubt that the best results are obtained when memory work is regarded not as merely part of the study of drawing, but as a system in itself, such as, for instance, that practised by the Japanese. (figs. 30, 30A). DRAWING FROM MEMORY. 109 The late Joseph Crawhall was an example of a train- ing in art exclusively through memory work. His early studies were directed by his father, who taught him to observe, and then make records from memory. India- rubber was not allowed, and attempts, one after another, were thrown aside until the desired impression was secured. All through life this habit of seeking after a completely artistic expression of his visual memory, per- sisted, and his friends have told their sorrow at seeing him destroy beautiful drawings, which, however, lacked some quality he sought. His desire to express himself was spontaneous, and overwhelming when it manifested itself, and often at the most inconvenient times. Another interesting feature was the sudden emergence of impres- sions which had lain dormant for a long period. One of his latest drawings, the subject of which was an episode from the Spanish bull-ring, was made fifteen years after he had actually witnessed such a scene, (fig. 31). His choice of subjects, animals and birds, and of his medium of expression, watercolour on linen, show him to have been much influenced by the Japanese. It is significant that at his death his studio was empty save for two partly finished drawings. There were no records of study, no bundles of notes, and no stacks of 'drawings, for as mentioned above, he destroyed all imperfect work. His drawings are hard to see, no public galleries having acquired any, but a good many repro- ductions of his work can be seen scattered among the volumes of the "Studio." But while Crawhall may have been a case of a special gift, it is evident that all art students can profit by a no DRAWING FOR ART STUDENTS. training in memory, and gain from it certain important benefits. Whistler is an instance of an artist who trained him- self to draw from memory, and Menpes' account of the way he studied his nocturnes on the spot with a friend, turned his back on the scene, and described the effect; kept it before his consciousness during the evening, and painted the picture the following morning, makes very interesting reading. We may almost consider him a pupil of Lecocq, some of whose students he knew. Millet is another example of a painter, who lounged about Barbizon, apparently the laziest man there, but all the time absorbing the form and spirit of the peasant life around him. Afterwards in his studies he "squeezed the sponge" and produced those paintings, of which the simplicity of the composition, the largeness of the forms and the unity of the whole, make it certain that they were not produced out of doors under an umbrella, and amid the distractions of details and variety, which invariably occur when one is painting from nature. When one looks at the drawings and paintings of the Chinese and Japanese — all memory work — one is amazed at the intimate character of the expression of form. The familiarity with the structure extends to the minutest detail. Early exercises in memory drawing should take note of this quality and insist on the exercises being of objects with which the students are familiar, or which they can examine closely. The pro- cedure of examination might follow some such steps as these : — (i) general proportions; (2) type form, as cube or cylinder, on which the object is based ; (3) main line of DRAWING FROM MEMORY. iii enclosing shape; (4) construction in detail of the object. Quite another type of exercise consists in asking the students to visualize a familiar object, which, however, is not produced at the time. An interesting exercise is one which Mr. Catterson Smith has initiated, consisting of drawing with the eyes closed. The exercise allows the following of the mental image by the hand without the embarrassment of seeing how far short the drawing comes. Certainly this method gives good results in composition, the movement being generally animated and rhythmical. In drawing the figure from memory, it will be well to take into account its powers of movement. Most really interesting pictorial material is evanescent, moving, shifting. The clouds chase one another across the sky, birds fly, animals walk, trot or gallop, water flows, breaks into foam, or marshals in waves, people meet and separate, all the time constantly moving. If drawing is attempted in presence of this living cinematographic picture, too often one finds one's sketchbook full of shreds and patches. One is lucky to secure a line suggesting the movement without the detail. A training in memory drawing of the right sort is wanted, and it should consist in approximating the con- ditions to those of the world outside the studio. The life model is posing, say for time sketching. Every period of such work should include at least one memory exercise, and it is well to consider what will be most suitable. All art students will remember attack- ing a pose which captivated them, but which the model -was unable to keep. It is these poses full of action 112 DRAWING FOR ART STUDENTS. which are required for the memory exercise. The model should be required to take up a vigorous attitude, such as throwing, running or thrusting, where the limbs and torse are extended to furnish a fine general line, a pose which, as a rule, is the despair of the life room, but in this case to be kept for a few seconds only. The student meanwhile watches the figure, searching the pose for the long line which shall establish the propor- tions and movement of the drawing, (fig. 32). The model then rests, while the students seek to express their first generalization. The pose may need to be resumed several times before a firm foundation for the drawing is obtained. During repetitions of the action the students examine the construction, and especially the placing of the feet if the model is stand- ing. Even the light and shade, so far as it explains the structure, may be memorized. The exercise has the further advantage of forcing the students to draw on right constructive lines. This method also secures good proportion, for working on the right principle,, from big to little, the proportions are seized from the commencement, and are often better from this point of view than those of drawings made with the model sitting continuously. Another advantage is that the student sees what is too rarely found in the life room, the model in strong" action. When a model is put up for a long period, the pose necessarily degenerates, because other muscles are brought into play. An experienced sitter is often an adept at making slight compensating alterations in the pose. With a view to assisting the model, aids such as y o r:il P « m o i2 c ,o ■T3 ii 3 '"S OJ -S Oh 3 C 4J ^ U 0-3 S.£P -P-C o ° Dh 3 " Ji 3 O t-: O re Oh b "->e r: c : re a, ; a -■i-'^aam&.-CM'. H o o >I3 CO F,c. 30A— The Japanese masters have left behind precise and direct draw- ings' of every natural or fashioned object existing in their country. It is see what an asset this is to a system of memory drawing. The west is without such a legacy. easy to 114 u "5 Fk:. 3IA — Drawing with charcoal on Michallct paper. The scnsitivc- ncbs of the contour should he noted. DRAWING FROM MEMORY. 117 a wedge placed under the heel when off the ground, are often used, or a hand in the act of pushing is supported, both cases a complete contradiction of the original idea. Students, seeing these devices used, become imbued with the notion that the model posed is a fixed object, and feel aggrieved if they detect the slightest devia- tion. CHAPTER XVII. ANIMALS. Animals, including birds and insects, are excellent material for study, because, by reason of their rapid movements, they quicken the eye. The student who can follow the changes in position which even a captive dove makes, will find the movements of the larger quadrupeds and of human beings comparatively slow and easy to record. The bird's plumage is at once a complexity and a simplification. The feathers, by reason of their con- tinuous overlap, unify the contour, but, on the other hand, tend to hide the bodily structure, which, however, may be discerned by careful watching. A common dove, which requires only a small box or cage, a handful of dari, or other seed corn, daily, and lives for years in captivity, apparently in perfect health, is one of the easiest of creatures to keep. It has none of the nervousness of most other domesticated birds, and may be fondled and examined without fright or suffering. In its plumage it is a model of the beauty of order, and its movements being more sedate than those of smaller birds, render it eminently suitable for study. (fig. 33). 118 'yiMnA^-^ Fig. 32 — A memory drawing of a figure in strong action. The upper figure indicates the movement by establishing the long curve running down the trunk and right leg. 119 #• EAfi, Covie;i^Ts J ^' ARIES U'APUtAli -Eco,VDAR|E5 BUTT OFVVINq^_ pfi.iM Allies Fif:. 3 3 — Sketches of a dove shewing the arrangement ot the plumage. ANIMALS. IZI It should first be impressed upon the student that birds in their structure approximate to that of animals — are more like than unlike. The wing, for instance, is a specialized arm, and if a dove is handled, the humerus, radius, wrist and thumb can be detected. The butt of the wing corresponds with the human wrist, but it is capable of doubling or flexing more fully than the latter, so that the bird when at rest can pack the wing into a small compass, the humerus, forearm and hand taking the form of a Z. The hand and fingers have coalesced, providing attachments for the strong pinions or primaries which beat the air; the secondaries, softer and weaker in structure, grow from the fore-arm and the 122 DRAWING FOR ART STUDENTS. so-called scapulars from the humerus. The bases of the long feathers are covered, by smaller plumes or coverts, the whole being bound strongly together by ligaments, so that the removal of the flight feathers from the wing of a large bird demands great force. Especially should it be noted when handling a bird, that the feathers are not distributed all over the body but occur in tracts, leaving naked areas. If the dove be turned over carefully and its breast feathers blown aside, the large area of the breast, void of feathers, will be seen. Again all the feathers of the upper surface, with the exception of the smaller wing coverts, overlap like the tiles of a roof, so that the uppermost feather might be said to be that next its beak and the lowest the outermost tail feather. As regards the wing, it should be noted that the first primary is the lowest in point of overlapping, and if one watches a bird close its wings the secondaries will be seen folding over the primaries. In examining the living wing care should be taken to hold it by the wrist, and not by the tips of the flight feathers, as a sudden movement on the part of the bird might dislocate a joint. The elbow may be distinctly felt on the reverse side of the wing, but is never seen from above. The thumb may be felt, and its little group of feathers noted, (fig. 34). What is known as the leg or shank is a specialized foot, the joint above corresponding with the human ankle. The knee cap may be felt higher up under the skin of the flank. The back claw is more like the human thumb than the big toe, acting as it does in opposition. It should S<^iW'»',i^ e o 1^ g H 3 ^ fe 4J 's 3 J OJ § ^ v ^ - ^ rt ^ o .J^ ti p. o rt 0=i aj U t^ fUD 1^ o o i-i C > Ij Vh OJ -ii -c; OJ Lh X J=! CL, o rt i>s aj ^ 2 -Q _c! rt ao ,;^ o c o 'y. S '> s .2 c VD *> ^ ^ QJ l-( CU <; , -d ' n CJ |i tn 3 j:: '-o ^ r«^ -a -d c C -f \ ■; 2 ^A c S a. ^ ^ Z 2 ■" S -« g 3 1"= o ■^ 5 ■iii^si 12+ ANIMALS. 125 be noticed that this claw has two joints only, counting its articulation with the foot, the second claw three joints, the third four, and the fourth or outside claw five joints. This is usually the smallest and weakest digit, like the human little toe. The neck of the bird commonly takes an S shape, slipping in and out of a notch in the sternum. When at ease the S is emphasized with a corresponding fulness in the neck, while when alarmed the neck is stretched the S losing its curvature and the neck its fulness. As everyone knows who has carved a fowl, the lower back or dorsal area of, a bird is determined by a fixed bony framework, and hence is quite incapable of change of shape. The anatomical structure of mammals corresponds more closely with that of man. As in birds, however, the hands and feet are specialized. What is called the knee of the foreleg of the horse corresponds with the human wrist, the hock of the hind leg being analagous with the heel of man. As in man the shoulder girdle is connected with the trunk mainly by muscular attach- ments. Hence the horse jumping off with the force afforded by the bony continuity of the trunk, and pelvis, lands with an impact of, say, four tons, on its fore feet, which, by reason of the elasticity of the attachment of the shoulders to the trunk, sustain the shock without injury. This freedom of the shoulder girdle shows itself very markedly in loose limbed creatures like the cat when walking, the slinging of the body between the front legs causing it to sway. When a fore foot is advanced the 126 DRAWING FOR ART STUDENTS. shoulder on that side is depressed, because the foreleg on the other side is supporting the weight, the arrangement reminding one of the slant of the hip-basket when a person rests the weight on one leg. (fig. 35). In the case of broad backed animals as the horse, when a hind leg is advanced or raised from the ground the tilt of the pelvis is very pronounced. When studying quadrupeds in motion, the student should first try to represent the walk of a slowly moving animal like the cow, which uses its limbs exactly as a crawling child would do. A hind leg moves forward followed immediately by the foreleg on the same side. Then the other hind leg moves, followed by its foreleg. (fig. 35). Manuals of comparative anatomy should be con- sulted for detailed statements of the bony and muscular structures. Here it will suffice to point out that just as in man the arm is continuous with the shoulder and the leg with the hip, so with quadrupeds. The legs should not be considered merely as those parts which protrude from the trunk, for the foreleg includes the shoulder blade, which moves with it, and similarly the hind leg is involved with the pelvis. In both cases structural lines reach to the back. (Fig. 35). In the case of shaggy and hairy animals like the bear and wolf the set of the hair and the influence of the hair whorls should be studied. Speaking generally the mental attitude of the student is often shown by the too irregular lines of his drawings of animals. He aims at depicting a large content of forms, where he should look for controlling ANIMALS. 127 lines, orderly arrangement and structure. This is especially true in regard to birds and insects, creatures which fly. The power of flight implies regularity and symmetry. Not seldom a drawing of a bird purporting to be alive, shows, by its raggedness, and by the feathers sticking out in odd places, that it has been drawn from a stuffed specimen. CHAPTER XVIII. LANDSCAPE. Drawing from still life from the living figure, and from the antique, gives practice in construction, line and tone, but these subjects all suffer from the defect of being relatively small. When students work out of doors, whether at buildings or landscape, new problems crowd upon them. The difficulties of estimating relative proportions, of, as it were, dilating the eye to embrace a large object such as a tree or tower, have to be grappled with, as also the question where one has to begin, what area is to be taken in, and whether the angle of vision is to be wide or narrow. For example. Degas, in his interiors with dancers, embraced a large area, so that one feels oneself amongst the figures, whereas Corot kept his figures much of a size, that is, he surveyed the scene from a distance. Then there is the difficulty of aerial per- spective, as it is called, quite wrongly, the weakened accent and blurred detail of distant forms as compared with those nearer the eye. A distant cow, for instance, should not be drawn as a foreground object in miniature. At a certain distance the legs and horns disappear. Lastly, there is the more prosaic but immediately press- LANDSCAPE. " 129 ing problem of the vanishing of receding parallels of building, etc., especially those above the eye. For discipline in all these matters, buildings afford excellent material. Turner, by his early studies of country mansions and ruins, laid the foundation of his facility in handling masses of architecture. It has often been remarked that the most difficult thing to draw out of doors is the earth's surface — the horizontal plane. Upright things are comparatively easy. Houses, trees, mountains and people correspond in position with the vertical plane on which in theory one is drawing, but fields, roads, rivers, clouds, flights of birds, etc., at right angles to this plane are apt to give trouble. The bias of vision causes such objects to be drawn as if they were oblique planes sloping upwards to a high, vanishing line. Clouds suffer especially, and a "vertical sky" is very common in student's work. In this connexion a flock of sheep would be a good test of a student's power to depict a horizontal surface. Their backs form a level plane which persists although the individual elements move to and fro. Anton Mauve and Jacque drew sheep well constructed, both anatomic- ally and in the mass. In reference to this question of the representation of the horizontal plane, it should be noted that ancient art, such as the Egyptian tomb paintings and Assyrian bas reliefs, ignored it in favour of the processional form of composition, in which the feet rest on what corresponds with the ground line of formal perspective. One often finds children doing the same thing; their figures walk along the bottom edge of the paper, the ground plane 130 DRAWING FOR ART STUDENTS. being assumed. Some of the great Italian decorators adopted this device, which gave dignity and loftiness to their compositions. It is to be seen in Mantegna's "Caesar's Triumph," at Hampton Court. One of the most fruitful causes of a failure to obtain horizontality is beginning the foreground too close to the eye. Corot should be studied in this respect, for, as remarked above, he generally began his foreground some distance ahead. In this way his figures are much of a size without the enormous disproportion between fore- ground and middle distance figures, which constantly startle us in modern work, and which the layman instinct- ively resents, — and rightly, because such work betrays a failure to understand the necessity of a convention of representation. Art students too often think of landscape not as material for study of form and composition, but as a mere sketching ground. Incidentally they add to their difficul- ties by working outdoors only in fine weather, and gen- erally in July and August, choosing also the middle hours of the day. They should remember Corot, who, soon after the sun had risen, shut up his painting box, remarking that the beauty of the scene had vanished. Painting in bright sunlight and heat tax the powers of a well-trained artist, but these very conditions lend them- selves to drawing, to a certain precision' and fixity of form, and yet few art students are seen drawing out of doors, compared with the numbers sketching with water colour. Masters of landscape have studied out of doors with the point from Claude onwards. If composition is the LANDSCAPE. 13 r theme, washes of grey or black will give opportunity for study, which the gay water colour pigments the student loves to dip in do not allow. They divert his attention from the fundamental masses of his composition. Such material as trees, rocks, the surface of water, rough or smooth, the varying aspects of cloud systems, often con- fuse the student because its appearance, while based on well-defined structural laws, yet in its apparent irregular- ity of contour, or its f ugitiveness, presents great difficul- ties, and he often fails to discern the underlying structure and order. But if the student is to realize the meaning of draughtmanship, which, however, is of no value unless one has something to say, a message to express, all visible natural phenomena are profitable exercises. The landscapist, for instance, must make himself intimately acquainted with tree structure, must know one species from another, and must devote much time to drawing rather than painting, because by drawing one arrives at a clearer analysis of structure, the bones, or branching structure as seen in winter, the way this is clothed in summer by foliage, the masses of which have a characteristic form for each species. Even the kind of stroke by which the edges of the masses are expressed must be sought, for example, the saw-like edge of the oak or the more lobate edge of the walnut or horse chestnut. The old drawing books of trees were not so much off the mark, though now considered out-of-date when they began their study of tree forms with a page of scribbled foliage — a recipe as it were for each tree, but which the student will arrive at as a result of his own striving. The study of rocks, hills and mountains, of reflec- 132 DRAWING FOR ART STUDENTS. tions in water, and the forms of waves and tumbling water must be studied by the same searching eye, always watching for structure and orderliness of form. Ruskin's "Modern Painters" contains much that is of great value in this respect and, apart from its art philosophy, should be studied for its practical art teaching. Ruskin was a great art teacher, and his exercises were always well con- ceived. This is not a manual of perspective, and indeed students who use their eyes, and occasionally hold up their paper to cover the scene they are working from, will not make outrageous mistakes. Much of what is known as parallel perspective is worse than useless, but a course of formal perspective on common-sense lines, the conditions approximating to those of ordinary vision and including reflections and shadows, will be of the greatest assistance, because the student's attention will be drawn to the broad planes which form the surfaces of the earth, sea, and sky. These planes being the groundwork of pictorial composition perspective enables the student to define their relations and interpenetration, under the simplest conditions. CHAPTER XIX. PLANT FORM. Mr. R. G. Hatton, in a passage in one of his books, speaks of the difficulty he finds in conveying to his pupils his own sense of the peculiar beauty of flowers — a beauty all their own and quite distinct from that of children or women. Students' drawings of plants often betray their lack of appreciation of the beauty of the form they think they are depicting. Like trees and shrubs, they are invested, by a careless eye, with the same untidy irregularity. Yet this is merely the superficial view. If we consider the delicacy of a seedling, so frail and so liable to all sorts of accident, the wonder is not that it is irregular, but that a plant's appearance is in any way orderly and beautiful. Exposed to a careless foot, cold winds, attacks of insects or plant parasites, and, above all, to the accidental de- velopment caused by varying distribution of light, yet it always shows itself true to the laws of its growth, arranges itself according to its order among plants, and in spite of caterpillar holes or broken stems it succeeds, for only a careless eye fails to see this order, and beauty of growth, which we call structure. 133 134 DRAWING FOR ART STUDENTS. A plant in flower may be compared with a beautiful woman putting on her most alluring raiment, and cer- tainly to succeed in expressing this beauty we must allow the plant personality, almost we must imagine that we ourselves are plants, that we desire to ignore the ravages of insects, etc., so that we may see the flower as it desires to be. To ensure some measure of success in securing order- liness, we must understand that the method of drawing previously used is here of the same value. It is drawing bit by bit, flower, stalk, leaves, as they happen to come, that produces irregularity and ugliness; and unfortu- nately flowers lend themselves to this method or want of it. The plant rather invites a separate scrutiny of its parts and seems to remain quite like a model sitting passively, prepared for a long pose. It should be noted, however, that the flower is not really passive, that it exhibits energy of growth in all its structure, in the un- folding of its leaves and flowers, in the new growth from the axils and in the line or curve of its stems, which varies in each species, (fig. 38). This energy in the most delicate of plants is often unheeded. For instance, the springing forth of the petals from their base is often rendered with a slack curve quite unlike the vigorous form of the corolla which the flower reveals, just as in the case of human action we have seen that often the drawing makes it tamer and more inclining to the passive. In this connexion Japanese drawings anjd prints should be studied. Their renderings of the chry- santhemum, for example, have all the vigour and move- ment that can be desired. The petals unfold and twist. PLANT FORM. 135 and yet show the subordinating power of radiation. A student's drawing of the same flower often misses this, the dominant impression being that of slack untidyness. Therefore, as the first strokes of a drawing of the human figure should show its inclination, and the direc- tions of the torse and limbs, so here the characteristic line of stem and general contour of mass of foliage or flowers should first be set down. (figs. 36 — 38). Mr. Walter Crane once called this the "invisible" line, to which the blossoms or leaves conformed. It is a remarkable fact that if the hand be passed over the flowers or leaves of a plant, it describes a curve varying according to the type, exemplifying the law of growth that parts of a living structure tend to merge into a single form. The authority just mentioned was fond of drawing a bunch of downy ducklings squatting together in the farmyard, producing in the jnass a strong resemblance to a full-grown duck. The rounded lines of the elm and chestnut produced by myriads of small leaf forms, and a similar curve formed in winter by the leafless twigs are further examples of the law. Given a drawing of a plant commenced with main structural lines, it should proceed to the expression of the details in the same manner. The groups of leaves being set down, each leaf may be seen to have its main shape, no matter how many lobes or divisions into which its edge breaks up. Each flower, too, has its type form, often cup-shaped, like the buttercups and wild roses, and no matter how tormented by wind, etc., the separate petals, nor how irregularly they are turned or twisted, the main lines of growth should be carefully looked for, if one 136 DRAWING FOR ART STUDENTS. dared to say it, a drawing of a plant should at the com- mencement be more orderly and regular in its forms than the plant appears. A^ to a knowledge of botanical structure, it may be as valuable to the student as artistic anatomy when drawing from the figure, though, as Lewis Day once wrote of plant drawing, if the eyes are well used the structure will not go far wrong. For purposes of study of form, how far should one take a drawing? There is some difference of opinion here, but one may say that the limit is reached when the student's observation fails him. One sees sometimes plant drawing full of shading that is not so much the result of observation as of industry. Drawing from the plant in outline is an attempt to express the form as it may be required for purposes of design. But this flat, would-be decorative treatment, defeats itself, for such a drawing is of use only for cer- tain kinds of work — flat pattern. A study can never be bodily appropriated for design purposes. Every etcher knows that his drawing must contain much more than the needle can use. Therefore the suggestion is made here that the plant drawing instead of being expressed by outline merely, however careful and deliberate, should be carried as far as the student's powers allow, first because as an exercise it is beneficial, showing what degree of refinement and detailed structure is possible in a drawing, and secondly because the more completely a student expresses his drawing, the more likely is he to have mastered the Fig. 37 — ^This sketch of a branch of the tulip tree shows that leaves apparently irregular and wayward in arrangement, conform to underlying rhythmical shapes, in this case ellipses. The flower is beautifully cup-shaped. '37 Pic. 38 — ^These sketches of plants show that each species has its own curve or line of growth, too often disregarded by the designer. .38 PLANT FORM. 139 Structure of the plant, and the more useful will the draw- ing be for reference. Design and composition can be treated here only inci- dentally, but it may be said that the principles underly- ing these studies, while they may be discovered in all natural form, may perhaps be seen most clearly in plant form. The principles of repetition, contrast, radiation, continuity of line and variety are all clearly exemplified, which perhaps accounts for the instinctive way in which assent is given to its appeal to the sense of beauty, and the general acceptance of plant form as the universal motive for design. To take one principle, that of radiation, as an in- stance, it will be noted how the lines of the plant seem consciously, as it were, to obey this law, which is clearly seen in the arrangement of the stems, flowers, leaves, etc. The structure takes cognizance of all the principles, but the plant seems to acknowledge radiation as its first law of beauty in form. Speaking generally the student of plant form is apt to produce snippets of detail rather than a carefully com- posed rendering. Without taking liberties with the plant the space at one's disposal and the arrangement of the forms on the page should be carefully considered. Every drawing should be an exercise in composition. CHAPTER XX. DRAWING AS A PREPARATION FOR PAINTING. "Make a careful drawing before commencing to colour," is a maxim art students hear very often, yet in «pite of it (or because of it ?) the advice does not always or often ensure success. It may be conceded, nay demanded, that the study of colour by painting must be guarded by careful search after form, without which colour can hardly be said to exist, and it will be well to ■discuss what constitutes a useful preparation for paint- ing. The difficulty which confronts a student is that for this groundwork, he must, as a rule, use an implement other than the brush, thus dividing the work into two stages, first a drawing made with a point, then a painting with a brush. With charcoal or pencil one is seduced into doing the sort of work characteristic of the imple- ment. Assuming the exercise to be a portrait in oil, a more or less complete expression of the model is often made with charcoal, pencil, or chalk, outlines of features, etc., being firmly drawn, outlines which one is dismayed to find, disappear under the first broad strokes of the "brush, or if one firmly resolves to keep within one's -edges, the paint shows hard and meagre at the edges, 140 15 C I ON 141 c c ^^ 5 -Q 3 O C ^ c ti o c -I---' 6 J 142 DRAWING AS A PREPARATION FOR PAINTING. 145 and, on the canvas being held up to the light, the con- tours appear as haloes surrounding the forms, indicating an absence of paint, and consequently a poor way of painting, a wretched technique. Now it is precisely along those contours that much of the work lies. Here are the "passages" of colour, where tone and colour change or pass across. The student should weld his edges, here melting into a broad envelop- ment, there being brought sharply together. In the Venus of Velasquez as already mentioned, the contours of cheek and shoulder are blurred, whereas in passages round the knees the edges are well defined, because these areas are more sharply focused. Therefore, if the student is interested in the painting of his edges, it will be seen that a preparatory drawing in another medium may be a positive hindrance. Further, if he concentrates too early on the details, his planes will suffer. Whether the painting is to be finished "au premier," or in successive stages matters not, the fact remains that a detailed initial drawing of the forms is worse than useless. Nothing written here, however, must be seized upon as an excuse for haste or careless- ness ; the placing made with charcoal should be carefully considered, and the strokes dusted out if need be, until lines significant of the planes, and showing the general direction of the forms and their proportion one to another have been settled. This is not easy if the student, as is often the case, is gloating over the "portrait," which should be achieved, however, by right method and not consist in tips for securing likeness. Especially should the torse be considered. It is in work- 144 DRAWING FOR ART STUDENTS. ing out these broad planes that the student really learns to paint : for, with the background, they afford ample space wherein to wield the brush. The planes, of course, are to be seen in the head also, but they are smaller and more complicated. Unfortunately, students are not seldom so preoccupied with the portrait that the torse receives but a small share of attention. It is perhaps the desire to make a portrait rather than to learn to paint that brings about the distressing medley of colours on face and body often seen on the beginner's canvas. Colour, instead of being united, is isolated, in spots of many hues, unrelated, like a patchwork quilt. But the study of colour, like that of drawing, should concern itself first with the big facts. The novice fails to see that every person has a complexion varying in each individual case, and showing not only in the face, but in the hands and throughout the body. Whatever variations are made in local colour should be carefully considered in relation to this general hue. Hence the value of painting from the human figure, giving as it does practice in generaliza- tions in regard to colour, and in looking at colour in the mass, just as in drawing, it demands search for main directions and chief planes to which the detail should be subordinated. When a study for oil painting is being prepared, charcoal should first be used to search out the com- position, the relations of the masses and the directions of the forms, all details being disregarded, (fig. 39). This can then be lightly dusted off, so as to leave no extraneous matter on the canvas, and a brush dipped in umber and rubbed on the palette until nearly dry, may DRAWING AS A PREPARATION FOR PAINTING. 145 be employed to fix the main forms, and carry the prepara- tion a stage further. The brush should be dragged over the surface so as not to fill up the tooth of the canvas with paint. This broad edge suggests envelopment and dis- courages tight painting. If desired, a clean brush dipped in turpentine may be used to sharpen the contour where contrast is required. That is, the whole of the passages may be studied in line before painting begins. It is however in water colour that the evil effects of a bad preparation are most clearly seen. The drawing is done according to tradition with the lead pencil, the seductive influence of which leads the student to make a study comflete in itself, the addition of colour resulting in a muddled and inartistic performance. This con- fusion comes from making a sharp distinction between drawing and painting, as earlier it has been seen to be made between drawing and shading. But whereas oil painting is painting, it is better to consider water colour as drawing, especially when used transparently on a white surface, a method which should be practised by every student before attempting gouache or mixed methods. All judges speak of water colour drawings, and in the early artists' colourman's catalogue, the water colour brush is referred to as a "pencil," a name which it would be useful to resuscitate, for beginners seem to regard a brush as an implement for sf reading or flooding colour, ignoring its chief merit and one which its makers show most care in obtaining, a flexible point surpassing even the pen in incisiveness and fluency. It may be noted here that while in the west, one or two brushes, all of the same shape are generally considered sufficient 146 DRAWING FOR ART STUDENTS. equipment by the student of water-colour, in Japan brushes are made specially for certain effects, wide flat brushes for broad washes, long pointed ones for drawing and writing, etc., so that the outfit comprises many brushes. It might be mentioned, also, that students are often the proud owners of brushes that while effective once have long outworn their usefulness. A watercolour brush, the point of which has disappeared, can only be used for rough work. For successful drawing, a student must periodically add to his stock of brushes. The Japanese painter does no preliminary sketching. He at once makes his drawing, and backs it up widi washes of colour. The western student, aiming at other results feels the necessity for a more tentative method, and certainly, if the caution that he is throughout making a drawing in colour be insisted on, there is no reason why the pencil preparation should betray a lack of unity with the following stage in colour. And as it is to be a draw- ing done in transparent colour, directly and without rubbing or washing out, there is need for this preparation to be more intimate and complete than in the case of the oil study. But students, ever anxious to indulge their taste in colour, are prone to slur over this preparation. They have a notion that the strokes of the brush need not show, forgetting that every time it is laid upon the paper it makes a mark of definite shape, whether dark or light. The most frequent cases of insufficient preparation occur in outdoor landscape composition, where the boundaries of the forms are hastily sketched without regard to their DRAWING AS A PREPARATION FOR PAINTING. 147 Structure or their edge contrasts. In such study the students are faced with a fresh complication. In their studio work, from the figure or still life, the compara- tive simplicity of the forms has allowed of a fairly com- plete rendering. But out-of-doors there are numberless small shapes which, though merging into larger ones, yet distract the eye by their multitude and complexity. The multitudinous forms, such as blades of grass, leaves of trees, cloud forms, etc., present a real difficulty to the beginner. Often he solves the problem in a utilitarian and inartistic fashion by stroking, spotting or dashing irregular splashes on the paper to imitate this apparent irregularity, and in the process loses the orderliness, the series, the radiating arrangements of leaves and branches. Here an insistence on a right preparation may save the student from falling too low in the artistic scale. He can be shown that the more complex the subject the more necessary is it to search out the significant forms, that likeness must be got through choice and not through 'dashing the brush on the paper in the hope of securing happy shapes, and that everything that is to be coloured should first be plotted out. Some of Turner's unfinished drawings should be examined from this point of view. Such importance did he attach to a good preparation, and so sure was his colour sense, that he not seldom made his drawing in pencil, giving all the time to this stage, and coloured it when away from the subject. Close scrutiny shows that his lines really prepare for the colouring ; the work is not a drawing painted over. In beginners' work one often finds pencilling which 14-8 DRAWING FOR ART STUDENTS. is of no use to the colouring, but rather a hindrance; features, hands, etc., are sketched in carelessly and with a profusion of strokes that takes no count of the subtlety of the brush point and its power of definition. Shading especially is out of court, leading, as it does, to dirty colour. On the other hand, all should be carefully drawn, as for instance the space for two hands clasped in the lap of a female sitter, (fig. 40.) Every portion of the composition should be prepared, the main masses and their relations, the directions of forms, while the position of details, such as the features, should be indicated without being completed in terms of a pencil. Such preparation strengthens the composition, gives emphasis to the connecting lines, and finally gives the brush full play in its charming power of elaborating detail. The pencil work, of course, may be carried very far 30 long as it does not interfere with the right function of the brush. A simple exercise would be a still life group (fig. 41), and it may be noted here that a subject which suits oil painting, revelling as it does in rich dark colour, is quite unsuitable for water colour if its quality and charm are to be considered. That is to say, if the student is to be given opportunity of studying his medium, in this case water colour, the masses should approach lighter tone rather than darker. Rich, glowing hues in water colours are only possible if the study is kept small in scale. Finally, the contour of the dark area should be drawn within, that of the light, outside the form. Fig. a I A water colour stud)- of still lite with a pencil preparation. The pencil lines are emphatic where strong passages occur, but are lighter or even disappear according to the degree of envelopment of the edge. The pencilling is not a drawing, but a preparation. *l >^ /r ■ /I 7 ^1 Fic, ^2 — A drawing b) Holbein. 150 [Windsor Castle. CHAPTER XXI. CONVENTION. Hitherto drawing has been treated as based on appearance. "Is it like?" has been the test, though always accompanied by the proviso that selection must be the student's aim. To draw everything the eye can discern is impossible, and it has been shown that the beginner's mass of unselected detail reveals his low level of artistic outlook. Though truth to nature has been insisted on in so far as the planes of the figure, and indeed, the beauty of its pose are revealed by light and 'dark, yet constantly in these pages the student has been cautioned that absolute fidelity to nature is impossible, and that any attempt in that direction leads only to a pseudo-photographic presentment essentially vulgar and inartistic. But if it be assumed that the student has some control over his vision, that he can face his subject calmly and set down with some precision his selected facts, the time has now come for him to see that this is only the beginning, that the practical convention of the particular form of art he has chosen will compel him still further to select and co-ordinate his facts in harmony with the necessary simplifications which his art demands, whether 151 152 DRAWING FOR ART STUDENTS. it be painting, engraving, mural decoration or illustra- tion. Of course drawing may be an end in itself. The portrait drawings of Ingres show that. One might have added those of Holbein, but for the fact that these were made as studies for portraits. Here is a typical instance of what is meant by convention. Holbein, following the custom of his day, and a very good one, understood it to be his business to master the forms of his portrait, especially the features of the face. Whether he intended to transfer them to the canvas is a secondary matter. He certainly drew as if he did. What he wanted was the actual limiting lines of his subject's features — all includ- ing the construction of the planes was subordinate to that, and in consequence, while drawing these boundaries with the most scrupulous care, he ignored in a great measure, and necessarily so, the give and take of the lighting, the envelopment, the forward and backward movement of the edges. Thus in the drawing of Sir Elliott Knight (fig. 42) the nose is drawn with a firm line throughout, though it is certain that under the general condition of lighting that part of the nose seen against the cheek would not in actual vision supply so strong and accented a line. But Holbein wanted to be sure of his form, and without conscious intention on his part, his convention created itself. Within these limits what delicacy and subtlety of vision can be discerned ! Almost it seems as if the restrictions under which he worked enabled him to see and represent with a maxi- mum of refinement. If the line between the closed lips for instance be examined, it will be seen how it varies. CONVENTION. 153 how unlike it is to the hard wire-like one might ignorantly assume would suffice for Holbein's purpose. It varies throughout its length, sdftening here, tightening there, showing that far from drawing it as a mere line, Holbein searched out the form of the line above, below, and especially the two ends of it. One might examine all his forms, with a like result. It seems ungracious after this to point out that Holbein is uncertain sometimes of the alignment of his features, that he occasionally places the eyes too high, and that he frequently makes the further eye too large, while noting however its distinctive forms. Starting then from Holbein's method we might assume a priori that each form of art demands its own convention of drawing, which has linked with it a depend- ent grace and beauty. The sketches of Alfred Stevens have already been referred to as examples of drawings made for a definite end. They are mainly studies for sculpture, and in them are seen the master's efforts to attain his ideal. He demanded the highest degree of plasticity, drawing his figures with solidity and weight, for they were to be translated into stone or bronze. He ignored the accidentals of light and shade, and rough hewed his figures with broad strokes indicating the actual structure, much as a biologist cuts up his tiny bone into a number of sections, or a geographer constructs a relief map by contour lines, (figs. 61, 62). More important still to Stevens was the movement of his figures. Here the meticulous exactness of Holbein's forms is replaced by a rain of lines, one might say scribbled in, but always with the aim of securing the 154 DRAWING FOR ART STUDENTS. Utmost freedom of movement and poise. He moved the lines, say, of the back twice or thrice, he drew an arm in several positions. In a word the master used drawing for his own artistic purpose, made of it a tool to express his ideals. Each form of pictorial representation in turn could be taken and shown to demand from drawing a conven- tion suited to its needs. The etcher seizes on the great planes of his subject; he makes use of force to hold his foreground forms near the eye, but with the tenderest delicacy his distances float away from it. Fig. 43 shows that the drawings have been made by an etcher; without the sub-conscious prompting of the acid bath it is not likely that the force of the darks and the delicacy of the more distant parts would have been rendered so directly. Similarly fig. 44 a study for an etching shows clearly that it has been made with the resources of the craft always in view. The great sign and foreground darks dominate the composition, while the background is kept tender and quiet, as would happen were it lightly bitten on a plate. But more than this, there is the know- ledge of the limitations of etching, that it is a convention and not an imitative process, that it depends on variety of line and shape, hence an insistence on these. Every window in the background has its individual treatment : no two are alike ; also many parts are worked to a closer degree of finish than the etching was intended to display, for it is impossible to put the whole of a drawing into an etching; one must have more than one can use in needling the plate from a drawing. C " . -i . < a e o u .'I* . rife:'. -- oil. ■ - (I 167 fii!ra!^jt5ilgngl!l!TM?pi]iM^P Fk. 46. — A brush drawing from a white Athenian vase (c}rLndrical). Though there are puzzling details such as the smallness of the man's hands, the parallelism of his feet, etc., yet the purity of line and the suggestion of form should be closcl}' studied. [British Museum. 168 THE DRAWINGS OF THE MASTERS. 169 and there are found statuettes of female figures mostly gross in form. The roof of Altamira is covered with full-sized col- oured drawings of paintings of animals, bison, horses, deer and pigs. They are outlined in black and washed over with red, brown and yellow pigments made from various iron and manganese earths. They show a cor- rectness of proportion and a freedom of movement which have never been surpassed while the extremely simpli- fied conventions used to express the structure and hair growths, have nothing in common with the childish scrawls of most living races of savages. The placing of the legs is practically in accord with photographs of moving animals testifying to the artist's quickness of eye and keenness of observation. In particular some draw- ings of mortally wounded bison in the last death spasm, with their legs crumpled beneath them and the tail vibrat- ing over the back show how well the draughtsman memorized a phenomenon with which he must have been: perfectly familiar. Other famous examples are the drawings of mam- moths, deer and horses on the walls of caves and on bone. The drawing of the reindeer, from Thayngen, and the three red deer crossing a river, from Lorthet, {Ancient Hunters. Sollas), show a close observation of the animals and a certain ease and freedom in representing them. They reveal the anatomical knowledge of one who has repeatedly skinned and dismembered his prey, the habits and movements of which have been his life- long study. And these drawings were made by a man so primitive that like the beasts of the field he had to go 170 DRAWING FOR ART STUDENTS. down to the river to drink. It may be said here that though he may have had to risk the sabre-toothed tiger and the great cave bear, yet the strange, enormous rep- tilian creatures, with whom he is sometimes associated in certain modern humorous drawings, had become extinct ages before. Of what we call composition we must not expect much. On the roof at Altamira the creatures are fitted in as closely as possible, some being superimposed on others, the idea apparent being to give the impression of a great herd. Elsewhere we get the usual panoramic composition of early art much as in the Egyptian and Assyrian freizes. One animal follows another, and oc- casionally there is a somewhat impressionistic repre- sentation of a herd of horses or deer indicated by a row of heads and foreparts much as one would see glancing along the front rank. What strikes one is that this earliest art is repre- sentational rather than consciously decorative. It may be that the artist connected his picture with the desires of his appetite, much as children, in the absence of the object they desire say a boat or doll, will draw it and thus to some extent satisfy their craving. Appar- ently this early man desired his drawings in line and colour to be as like as possible, which is perhaps why Mr. Clive Bell dislikes them. They may even be symbolic of food to be used by the soul after death as in Egyptian art which also exhibits exceedingly well-drawn animals. But in Egypt had grown up an ancient civilization where the priesthood ruled and prescribed minutely the conventions of the forms in the paintings which min- c; " S .5 ,„ u c 17> Fig. 48 — A drawing b)' Holbein. Great care has been given to the eyebrows and the line between the lips. The far eye appears somewhat too large. [British Museum. 172 Fic. 49 — A drawing by Holbein. Certain forms which were evidentl)' deemed essential to the likeness have been careiull)- redrawn with a hard point on the thin films of charcoal or chalk. These are the eyelids, the nostrils and the line separating the lips. [Windsor Castle. "73 Fig. 50 — In this drawing by Leonardo da Vinci the|features have more veracity than the fanciful armour, and bear a great resemblance to the elder Tedeschi, a model known to a generation of art students. Such a profile could only have been drawn of an Italian by an Italian. [British Museum. ■74 THE DRAWINGS OF THE MASTERS. 175 istered to the national religion. Reference has been made already to the way in which man was portrayed in the Egyptian canon of form. Apparently however the animals had escaped the attention of those who laid down the rules of representation, and in consequence as we see if we consult the book of the Dead, reproduced by the British Museum Authorities, or the wall paintings and drawings, the cats, dogs and especially the baboons and birds are lifelike in their proportions, structure and movement, drawn as they are in much the same simple convention as was used by the cave men. Assyrian art runs a parallel course. The bas-reliefs in the British Museum are cut in soft gypsum or alabas- ter, the work of a victorious people in a hurry, and often the relief is so slight that the work may be considered as a drawing. Here again there is a convention of the human figure, with swollen muscles on a brawny frame, and again also the sculptors seem to have looked at animals with a clearer eye than when they attempted men. Their horses are good, and their lions better, the most famous being the slab whereon is depicted a lioness dragging herself along the ground, her hind quarters having been paralysed by an arrow, (fig. 45.) She is roaring, the skin of her nose wrinkled in agony. The relief is little more than i inch, and again one can say that the artist must have witnessed this sight, and set down with convincing clearness his memory vision of it. Following the line of successive nationalities one inquires what drawings were made by the Greeks. For- tunately their drawings are plain to see on their vases. At last the artists have become interested in the forms 176 DRAWING FOR ART STUDENTS. of man and though we may assume that the vase painter was little more than a workman yet the best vase paint- ings lag but little behind the best Greek sculpture. It will be convenient to examine the white vase paintings, where the backgrounds are not painted in. They are called paintings but they are really brush drawings and done with an ease, and fluency of expression that makes them worthy of the closest study. The draughtsman must have worked with some speed ; he had to turn out a quantity, and his convention arose out of the necess- ities of his occupation. He used his line with the utmost economy, but his eye, his draughtsman's soul was all the time concentrated on the point of his brush, which pro- duced a line of the utmost flexibility and sensibility. (fig 46.) From the Greeks to the medievals is a long step both as regards technique and sentiment. Once more drawing has been grasped by the priesthood to serve religion. The figure has to express hope, fear, rever- ence. The features are expanded until they fill the face ; the hands stretched out with stiff fingers implore, deprecate, or command. The figure is hidden in the long lines of the draperies. The line is still there but it is now the convention of a craft of which the conditions are necessarily stringent to a degree — ^that of stained glass. The form is subordinated to the leads of the window, the angularity of the medieval forms being asso- ciated with the special quality of the material — glass. Another step, and one comes to the man who stood at the parting of the ways — ^Albert Durer — who inherited the gothic tradition of angular forms, piped draperies and scriptural subject matter, yet reached out to the -^ c o W -T3 -Q 3 « SO ^ - ..• s I-, " "U 1J - •-^ ^, -CJ dj Lh d -^ OJ £^ • ^ '77 '^-' ■aj;'^; Fk;. 52 — A chalk drawing h) Raphael. 'I'he interest in form should be noted. It is lull of overlapping contours. The drawing is hut little concerned with the photographic aspect of the model. '78 "<0 '.■>*■!.. •js»'.i;' ■isaa^*; f > Fig. 5 3 — A drawing b)- Ruhens in black and red cliajk. He drew more by the lights than the darks. We may be certain that there was more tone under the chin than is shewn by him. But he wanted this to be not a light and shade study merely ; the expression of the sitter, alert, listening, arch, is what he has achieved. The drawing is full of vitality. The face seems alive. [British Museum. 179 Fk.. 5-1- — A chalk drav\ing by Rubens. The fine line descending from the head to the knees should be noted as also that uniting the arms. [British Museum. THE DRAWINGS OF THE MASTERS. i8i Renaissance, with its renewed interest in the unclothed figure as seen in classic myth, and in the mass of archi- tectural and other forms which accentuate the new style. The conditions of Durer's career as an artist made him the very type of a draughtsman. He was to be the world's great illustrator, and as such he had an intense curiosity in the forms of things. He drew the ancient roofs of his native town, horses, men in armour, every- thing he might want in his engravings and woodcuts, and as an illustrator he makes use of all his drawings. Like the Japanese he drew and redrew his subject until he was line perfect, and like them he was always simplify- ing, refining his line down to its lowest terms, often until it became a mere decorative motive, a trick of the pen. But this simplification forced him to study struc- ture, with the result that every stroke of Durer's repre- sents a definite fact; his simplest drawings are full of anatomy, whether they be of plants, animals, or persons. (fig. 47.) Walter Crane must have studied Durer, and his mannerisms came from his efforts to make his line express as much as possible of the form, the bend of the wrist or ankle, the twisting of the neck, and the radiation of the toes or fingers, with the result that people who were not interested in structure cried out that he was deforming the figure. The criticism shows the necessity of a draughtsman constantly comparing his convention with natural form, of self criticism. He should avoid, and it is the most difficult thing to do so, falling into ruts of expression, mannerisms, that is unnatural form. It is the young student curiously enough whose work is full of undigested conventions for he seems to absorb them from 1 82 DRAWING FOR ART STUDENTS. the nursery onwards. He unconsciously abstracts from the work of the artist he admires, its tricks of handling, rather than the good qualities revealed only on close study. That is why copying is to be deprecated, for this practice does not always imply study. What study is and what it involves students will do well to ponder over. Of Holbein much has been said in these pages. Like Durer he was a great pen draughtsman, and could design with facility in the new style, with its classical mould- ings, capitals and acanthus. But when he confronted his sitter he put all the new forms and conventions aside, and looked at his model with an eye cleared of Italian motes and beams, (figs. 42, 48, 49.) In Italy Giotto broke away from the more formal Byzantine manner. His figures have weight and power, though his accessories, his hills, trees and animals are the merest recollections. But he took the turn towards naturalism and all through the fourteenth century the Italians were examining nature and trying to draw and paint like the model, though not knowing quite how it was to be done. Botticelli has been referred to as one who used the nude figure constantly with much poetic grace, yet without a clear knowledge of its structure and articulations. It was Leonardo da Vinci with the inqui- sitive scientific spirit and full measure of the organizing faculty who did everything to form what may be called the academic convention, especially in regard to light and shade, except actually to set up a school of art. (fig. 50.) The study of perspective, involving shadows and reflections, and of anatomy with its dissections did much to direct the study of art in the same path. Fig. 55 — This unassuming drawing b}' Ruhens shows beautiful rh}'thm of line. The pose quiet as it is, is full of action. The feet should be noted, drawn as one form, and the difficult turn of the head has been attacked. Many students do not realize the loss of length in such a pose and make their sitting and crouching figures much too high. [British Museum. i8j 'i -s m 6 C P ^ O ^73 3i ^ ^ 6 > <1^ i8+ ''■ "'511 7! f:-^' ij 'i. i M' r-\ .■ Fig. 57 — One of Ingres' portrait drawings of which he made a great number while at Rome. Full of search for form and rhythmical line. Note how the two arms have been unified. F.very fold in the clothes tells of the form beneath. i8s .V/ ' . 'lUl^-.i It:a p[c. 58 — A chalk drawing by J. F. Millet which shows his method clearly. He has been quick to seize the forms which emerge from the heavy, hanging garments. The drawing has a rhythm of its own. 186 THE DRAWINGS OF THE MASTERS. 187 In the drawings of Mantegna one sees a closer return to the classic spirit. So insistent is the line that the shading is simpler and more summary in its method than the convention used by the northern draughtsmen, of whom Durer may be cited as the chief example. Durer covers his forms with lines drawn round them each sug- gesting a section through the mass, a convention much used by the northern engravers and etchers. Manteg- na's shading consists of straight lines drawn diagonally, the easiest movement of the hand across the paper. This convention while it does not allow of a certain over- realized, almost stereoscopic form which is seen in work produced by the northern engravers, is simple and direct and defines the planes more clearly. The tendency ever since has been to adopt it for the study of form, and mediums like charcoal, chalk, pencil and pen lend themselves to it. Even a modern pen draughtsman like Mr. G. D. Armour uses it almost exclusively. Michael Angelo, though a giant yet learned all his academic teachers could impart, and transformed his study by his volcanic genius. When he drew it was to reveal structure, and especially the overlapping of coii^ tours, rather than the appearance, though if he chose he could load his surfaces with shading in the correct Italian style. He was preoccupied with the figure as his raw material in design ; he combined nudes, grouped them, flung them together in ropes, festoons and swirls, held together by his great line running round torses and along limbs, (fig. 51.) Rubens trained in Italian methods made numberless drawings and sketches for compositions; many of the 1 88 DRAWING FOR ART STUDENTS. latter however are painted in monochrome. His work shows how a man is dominated by .his own tempera- ment, and also by the tendencies of his age. Women smile, men strike flamboyant attitudes, horses prance, curtains swirl in the wind, and vivid masses of red ener- gise the composition. The Philip and his Queen painted by him are portraits of people well pleased with themselves and in robust health. When one turns to the portraits of the same people by Velasquez, a man of their own race and therefore more likely to realize the national character, very different personalities are revealed, cold, indifferent and passive. The drawings of Rubens show equally this exuber- ance of spirit. He is one of the very few who could command a full measure of vitality and action; his figures move with freedom, with an amplitude of gesture as well as of form. (figs. 54 55.) His study of Michael Angelo shows in his work though mingled with his own temperament ; in place of the latter's elemental violence he substituted a jovial turbulence. But he drew as he painted with a mastery over his material. He exercised a strict economy of means. In his drawing of a woman's head (fig. 53) he went far beyond a mere por- trait ; he is concerned with the pleasant disposition of his sitter. In other words he drew the smile rather than the features, and achieved both with the minimum of light and shade. He refused to dirty his drawing with mere masses of dark and gained his end rather by working round his lights, for to him the lights were the essence of the form. In Holland, Rembrandt among the Italianizing Fig. 59. — A drawing in pencil by Lord Leighton. 189 Fi(.. 60. — A drawing by Lord Lcighton, made with black and white chalk on brown paper. 190 I t THE DRAWINGS OF THE MASTERS. 191 Dutchmen stood alone. Here again like Durer and Holbein, his subject matter for his etchings is from the Bible, though he sat at his window and accepted the types and costumes of the Jewish folk who swarmed below as they do to this day. He like Durer was always accumulating material, though many of his so-called drawings are compositions set down hastily as they came into his head^ and often with splendid emphasis on the significant lines. He is the very type of an artist. Every event, and there were some sombre ones in his career, seems to call forth from him not speech or letter, but drawings, in which he sought new ways of expressing himself, a new outlook. When his wife lay dying, he made a slight pen-drawing of her, pinched and wan in bed. After her death he wandered by creeks and ham- lets outside Amsterdam drawing with simple pen strokes what he saw, the roads, trees and tumble-down houses, which latter cannot be found there any more; for in Holland all is now clean and tidy, especially the fish- wives of Marken, who hasten themselves and their chil- dren into their ancient dress when they see an excursion steamer, full of tourists, approaching. These drawings are models of compressed expression, for while Rem- brandt was thus trying to solace himself for his loss, he was subconsciously working out like Durer a method of putting things down in their simplest terms. Many painters have left but few drawings, a pro- minent instance being Velasquez. It has been thought that he attacked his composition on the canvas without preliminary work for there are pictures by him where strips of canvas have been added, t)ecause, as he pro- 192 DRAWING FOR ART STUDENTS. ceeded, the development of the subject demanded more space. But the absence of drawings is no reason why the student of form should neglect Velasquez for he was one of the greatest of draughtsmen. He had not the swagger of Rubens, the feeling for humanity of Rem- brandt, nor the clearly defined edge of Holbein, but in his brushwork he showed a knowledge of and a means of suggesting atmosphere, which no other master quite reaches. He draws with the brush in a real sense, for he goes far beyond the earlier technique of painting, the bringing of two surfaces of paint sharply together in a contour. With some painters if the canvas is held to the light haloes appear round the forms where the paint is non-existent. But Velasquez welded his edges together so that they became one passage ; he placed accents in different degrees of intensity to suggest nearness to the eye, or by blurring edges he quietened the forms farthest from the centre of interest. Some of the dwarf and jester portraits painted with less of the decorum and stiffness of the court portraits, as if he did them to please himself, show the height of his powers as a draughtsman. In France during the Renaissance, the artists looked largely to Italy for inspiration and guidance. But it was Jean Clouet from Flanders who founded a great school of portrait drawing. He settled in Paris and with his descendants painted a vast series of small por- traits. For these, as did Holbein some years later, he first made drawings in black and red chalk, the latter medium being already much in use in Italy. The Clouets and their followers made numbers of these por- THE DRAWINGS OF THE MASTERS. 193 trait drawings, justly famed for their delicacy and pre- cision. Later Watteau and other artists of his period used the method with more vigour applying it to figure com- position generally. Mr. W. Strang, followed by other modern draughts- men, has revived the method for his series of portrait heads. Claude is noteworthy as one of the first painters to study or sketch outdoors. But these drawings made mostly with the brush, are rather studies of composition — how the light falls on groups of trees and tree trunks, and divides the composition into masses of shade, though he certainly drew twining ivy and slender branches of foliage against the sky. One; wishes but vainly for some drawings of still life by Chardin, to note how he indicated the volume of his fat bottles, and their effect against his quiet back- grounds. Watteau left numberless drawings mostly with the red and black chalk handed down from the Clouets. Here was an artist who valued drawing for what it was worth to him. He wanted above everything movement easy and langorous perhaps on the surface but suggest- ing a hidden fire, vivacity and alertness, (fig. 24). The lady seated on the ground with her hand on the arm of the gallant is about to rise. The impression of move- ment is conveyed, while the contrast of the rising torse with the scrumpled legs hidden in the voluminous skirt is stated with conviction. Watteau used the chalk rather than the brush in making his studies, because he 194 DRAWING FOR ART STUDENTS. knew that the hard point enabled him to deal more trenchantly with structure and movement. It is pre- eminently painter's drawing or rather drawing for painting. How often does the student make his studies for a picture, in say water-colour only to find that this medium has its own convention, demanding the disre- gard of everything not essential to it, with the result that the water-colour study contains little that is of direct use and worse still has not impressed on the mind facts of structure and line required for the carrying out of the work.? Drawing with charcoal or with the point would have helped him to arrive at the essentials, without im- posing on him conventions clashing with those special to the material which he proposes to use. The modern era is now reached. Jean Dominique Ingres, the upholder of the academic banner against the romantic movement had perhaps the most skilful pencil of any draughtsman early or recent. His cleverness approaches legerdemain, so that there are those who declare that to place his drawings before the student is to court disaster, luring him to attempt by trickery what no one but Ingres could accomplish. His methods how- ever, are plain in his drawings, reproductions of which may be seen in Newne's edition (now out of print). He surveyed the pose, sketched in the leading lines, studied the structure beneath the clothes with light strokes before he concentrated on details. He made many portrait drawings while in Rome for a few francs apiece, and as time was short, gave most of it to the head, the remainder of the drawing being left with the first strokes showing. The finish he gaye to the surface forms of the face is of THE DRAWINGS OF THE MASTERS. 195 course possible only to himself, though well worth the keenest attention, for it could have been compassed only by a close study of the structure, (fig. 57.) Jean Francois Millet is to be noted among the Barbizon groups for his drawings. He was a type of artist who painted in series. A picture was influenced and suggested by an earlier one, to which it formed a corollary, and as it were completed it. He wished to depict the whole life of the French peasants of his time, their labours and privations and how these varied during the year. His mode of study required first and always close observation rather than actual painting from the model and scenery, which he despised as tending to triviality. Consequently he made numberless notes of figures engaged in rural occupations, mainly from memory. His drawings show without finicky detail the character and bodily structure of his subject; even the drapery seems to have its appropriate weight and coarse- ness of texture, while the action leisurely and untKeatrical is expressed with a sombre strength, (fig. 58). Puvis de Chavannes worked after the great schools of art in Paris had established themselves and settled their methods, and therefore made the studies for his great mural decorations with charcoal the implement commonly used for drawing from the life. His draw- ings are excellent, so solid and weighty are his figures, the feet firmly planted on the ground and the structure cared for throughout. Mr. C. H. Shannon has one squared off for transferring to the canvas. Of the drawings of the great French master Degas, only the studies of the ballet dancers are familiar to 196 DRAWING FOR ART STUDENTS. Engli&h students, and these mostly from reproductions. Degas, and not without prolonged study, achieved an extraordinary degree of intimacy in his drawings. His people never look like models stuck on a throne, and so quietly and naturally do they move that the artistic mas- tery is only observed after careful scrutiny. This feeling of what one may call "at homeness" though Degas did not always seek his subjects at home, is not easy to analyse and account for. His drawings are the opposite of diagrams or maps of form. His figures are always depicted in relationship with their surroundings and one of the secrets of his power in this respect may lie as has been pointed out, that he drew as it were with a wide angled lens, not as if he were surveying a stage or scene from a distance, but as if sitting among those he depicted so that one would have to turn the head to take in the width of space taken up by the drawing. And as one might expect Degas was very careful over the placing of his accents, and equally so with his non-accented passages, those where the form merged into the back- ground. The Burlington Magazine recently published some illuminating articles on the master by Mr. Walter Sickert, and also reproduced three views of a head. In Germany Adolf Menzel during a long life made more drawings than any other painter. They are all painter's studies, that is for use in his pictures, which were mainly historical in character and needing the closest attention to details of costume, architecture, etc. They are highly realistic and made mostly with black chalk and charcoal. A characteristic selection is reproduced in Newne's series, but there are very few Fic. 6 1 — A drawing in red chalk b)- Alfred Stevens. 197 Fig. 62 — A drawing in red chnlk by Alfred Ste\'cns. Red challc should be avoided by students. The colour distracts their attention from the form. 198 THE DRAWINGS OF THE MASTERS. 199 originals to be seen in Britain. In his insistence on structure and in his tenacity he reminds one of Durer, though with an almost photographic vision, a result attained however not by stippling, but by direct and summary methods. There is a chalk drawing of the two reclining female figures from the Parthenon which must have been made at top speed and yet everything is there. The figures were indicated and their ample forms sug- gested by smudges of chalk, the accents of the drapery etc., being set down firmly on this preparation. Hol- bein must have used a similar method, for several of his portrait heads show the silvery shading done with stump or finger the pen drawn accents of the features for some reason having been omitted. Menzel's methods must have aroused much interest on the continent which perhaps account for the exclu- sive use of charcoal, a favourite medium of his, in the art schools. Menzel spared no pains to get on intimate terms with his subject material, the current military and court life of Germany, the most exacting in details of equipment and social custom. His importance as his^ torian was acknowledged, and on several occasions important conferences suspended their business, while Menzel took out his sketch book and made notes of costumes or grouping. In England, of the brilliant group of portrait painters, Gainsborough is most famous for his drawings, perhaps because he had more time. He obtained a beautiful silvery quality but the portraits are rather quick sketches for composition than studies of form, and the same may be said of his landscapes. 3O0 DRAWING FOR ART STUDENTS. The illustrators of the sixties the magazines of which period should be bought and treasured by every student of figure composition, Millais, Charles Keane, Fred Walker, Sandys, and many others, by their enthusiasm made that decade perhaps the brightest in the history of British art. The illustrations are really drawings though at second-hand through the medium of the engraver. The ignorant and youthful student on turn- ing over the pages of these magazines glances at the pegtop trousers and crinolines, and pronounces the illus- trations old-fashioned. The fashions .however are nothing, the art is everything, and the student must look beyond the one to absorb the other. The period is not yet far enough removed as is the dress of the eighteenth century, to seem romantic. It must be remembered that these draughtsmen had not the freedom of the present-day men to draw to what scale they liked, but drew on the wood the actual size of the print and in reverse, which sometimes added im- mensely to their difl&culties. Turner left the nation thousands of sketches, an astonishing number when his output of what he con- sidered finished work is considered. He influenced Ruskin who emphasized the need for close study of growth and structure. Of late his art teaching in this direction has been somewhat ignored partly because he advocated the copying of bits of Durer etc. But he gave reasons for all his exercises and not a few have never acknowledged or perhaps even understood their debt to his teaching. Turner himself as Ruskin has pointed out, in his drawings of landscape displayed ex- Fig. 63 — A drawing on dark paper ot an old woman's head by Matthias Grunewald. A worl< of great vitality and force. The skull high at the back as in women shows clearly through the head covering which, though the draughtsman mast have been quite familiar with, he draws with inquisitivcness as if he had seen it for the first time — the right attitude for a student of drawing. [British Museum. ^''Af :' * .s e O 3 iH 3 o c S o -o ■ —.■ -73 c u c i- u 'O 3 QJ -T3 T3 C O CLh SI O c 1- w O O j; J h X Si -+■ ■ 60 \o C 'i d rt fe 13 Fig. 65 — A drawing in red chalk by Giorgione of a nude in stnjng action. The dominant line of the pose starts with the head and then travels down the neck .along the spinal column to the legs. The head, hands and espechally the feet shew less observation than the torse and limbs. 203 Fig. 66 — A composition by Frngonard. An example of drawing with the brush. The .ibrupt square rh)thm of stroke is very evident. The drawing is lull ot movement, secured by giving the "directions" their full degree ot obliquity. [British Museum. THE DRAWINGS OF THE MASTERS. 205 traordinary knowledge of the structure of natural form ; the lie of the ground, the cleavage of rocks, the folds of the hills he made clear, and was equally at home in showing the perspective and arrangement of cloud forms and the movements of water. He had a keen percep- tion of rhythm and a profound understanding of com- position. He made the salient points of his masses whether mountain, trees, or city wall conform to large invisible curves, and was master of the art of leading the €ye into the picture to some desired point. Of drawings by modern masters those by Lord Leighton are well known by reason of their frequent re- production, and exhibition in schools of art/ His early drawings of plant forms were in line with Ruskin's teaching. Delicacy and precision are shown in fig. 59, yet a full range of curve and movement is given to the stalks and leaves. The emphasis though not insisted upon is sufficient to detach the forms. The subtly varying lines of the flower stalks should be noted. The arrangement of the flower heads has been observed. No two are on a level and the spaces between are unequal. Leighton's drapery studies (fig. 60) show a technique which has been widely adopted. They were made with black and white chalk on brown paper. He took pains to understand the forms under the drapery, sometimes mak- ing a preliminary drawing from the nude. The study must be looked upon as a working drawing, to be used in a painting, and therefore giving the fullest possible con- tent of forms, which accounts for its over accentuation. 2o6 DRAWING FOR ART STUDENTS. Alfred Stevens has already been referred to. Figs. 6i, 62, should be studied carefully. In fig. 61 move- ment and structure were the pre-occupation of the master. It should be noted how the curved form grasped by the model, dominates the pose, a curve repeated in reverse by the figure. The joints are well marked. The line of the arms is continued across the shoulders and back. The repeated attempts to place the right arm and hand show that the involuntary movements of the model were seized on to give increased vitality to the pose. Stevens was one of the few draughtsmen who give all the move- ment the human figure exhibits. In FIG. 62 the shade lines are used to suggest the planes, and to give the weight and solidity of the body, which is insisted upon as much as in any "cubist" drawing. A curious instance of academic "shading" occurs in the rendering of the left shoulder. In the arm repeated below, the linear method is reverted to. The amplitude of the forms should be noted. Whistler is said by Cuneo to have deprecated the study of drawing as practised in the art schools yet his numerous drypoints and lithographs which are essen- tially drawings prove him to have exploited drawing to the utmost. He cannot be called a skilled draughts- man, and the structure and details of the bands in his portraits gave him great trouble, yet he will always be studied for his delicate perception of the sinuous and flexible in line, of the gradation of tone and the value of the right place of accent. According to Mempes he once described his method of drawing which however went on all fours with that of other masters. He first Fig. 67 — A sketch in pen and ink and wash by Guercino. Everything is subordinated to the action and rhythm of line and the phicing of the accents of dark. [British Museum. 207 Fig. 68 — A wonderfully detailed dra\Aing b)- David Loggan. The head seems too low in the oval. " D}namic Symmetry " might be able to show that this is so because the features do not happen to coincide with important divisions of the rectangle enclosing the ellipse. [British Museum. zo8 THE DRAWINGS OF THE MASTERS. 209 placed his focus of interest, it might be a figure, tower or bridge, where he wanted it. From this he threw lines establishing the masses of his composition, and his mind at ease' he went on to express in detail whatever part he chose to work at. Reference is made elsewhere to the way he trained his memory. While so many masters must be omitted necessarily, one may barely mention Vierge that master of line and of the placing of darks. His work should be closely studied by all illustrators. This chapter will close without any reference to living masters or to new movements in the study of form, though the student will take a keen interest in the con- troversies of to-day and will certainly admire and per- haps found himself upon the work of those whom he feels most in sympathy with. The omission must not be taken as implying that there are no great draughtsmen living, or that the new movements are negligible. But all in these pages has been concerned with form in its three-fold aspect of movement, structure and appearance as revealed by light. If the student has been well grounded on some such lines, the new theories of form will have no terrors for him, nor will he be con- founded by their results; but it is evident that in this book only those methods' which have been sanctioned by the practice of the long line of masters could have been dealt with. INDEX. N.B. — The figures in heavy type indicate those pages on which Illustrations occur. Anatomy, 94, 98 Animals, 118, 127, 120, 123 Artists : Botticelli, 4 Correggio, Frontispiece Crawhall, 109, 115 Degas, 3, 196 Durer, 4, 171, 176 Fragonard, 204 Gainsborough, 199 Giorgione, 203 Giotto, 182 Griinewald, 201 Guercino, 5, 91, 207 Holbein, 4, 90, 150, 152, 172, 173, 182 Ingres, 4, 185, 194 Leighton, 189, 190, 205 Leonardo da Vinci, 174, 182 Loggan, 208 Lorenzo de Credi, 202 Maclise, 38 Menzel, 196 Michael Angelo, 177 Millet, 186, 195 Raphael, 178 Rembrandt, 4, 5, 184, 188 Reynolds, 89 Rubens, 5, 179, 180, 183, 187 Ruskin, 27, 132 Stevens, 153, 197, 198, 206 Velasquez, igi Vierge, 209 Watteau, 82, 193 Whistler, 206 Assyrian Bas-Relief, 167, 175 Athenian Vase, Drawing from, 168, 175 Backgrounds, 60 Bias of Vision, 7 Birds, 120, 121 Botticelli, 4 Chalk Drawings, 99, 100, 171 Charcoal Studies, 41, 42, 47, 48, 54, 63, 69, 70, 92, 116 Chinese Drawings, no Clouds, 27 Composition, 5, 139 Construction, 30 — 33 Convention, 151 — 160 Correggio, Frontispiece Costume Study, 142 Crawhall, 109, 115 Cylindrical Forms, 23, 24, 25 Degas, 3, 196 Design, 139 Durer, 4, 171, 176 Edge Study, 85 Etching, Pencil Studies for, 154, 155 211 212 INDEX. Face, 22 Figure Studies, 19, 20, 32, 49 — 84, 53, 54, 55, 59, 63, 64, 70, 92, 116, 119 Figure, Time Sketching, 73 — 79 Form, 103 — 106 Form, Search for, 39, 61-72 Fragonard, 204 Gaiasborough, 199 Giorgione, 203 Giotto, 182 Griinewald, 201 Guercino, 5, 91, 207 Head, 22 Holbein, 4, go, 150, 152, 172, 173, 182 Illustration, Drawing for, 161 — 165 Ingres, 4, 185, 194 Japanese Drawings, no, 113, 114 Landscape, 128 — 132 " Lay in " of Oil Study, 141 Leighton, 189, 190, 205 Leonardo da Vinci, 174, 182 Light and Shade, 34 — 46, 41 Loggan, 208 Lorenzo de Credi, 202 Maclise, 38 Memory Drawing, 107 — 117, 119 Menzel, 196 Michael Angelo, 177 Millet, 186, 195 Movement, 51, 52, 53 Oil Painting, 141, 144 Painting, Drawing as a Prepara- tion for, 140 — 148, 141, 142 Pencil Drawings, 43, 44, 156 Perspective, 14 Planes, 22 Plant Form, 133 — 139, 124, 137, 138, 189 Post-Impressionists, 7 Proportion, 3, 13 — 21 Quadrupeds, 29 Raphael, 178 Recumbent Forms, 20, 28 Related Figures, 80 — 84, 81, 82 Rembrandt, 4, 5, 184, 188 Re5molds, 89 Rubens. 5, 179, 180, 183, 187 Ruskin, 27, 132 Sincerity, Quality of, 3 Stevens, 153, 197, 198, 206 Still Life, 42 Style, 4 Sub-consciousness, 11 Tone Study, 34 — 46 Toned Paper, drawing on, 10 1 102 T5rpe Forms, 22 — 29 Velasquez, 191 Vierge, 209 Vision, Bias of, 7 — 12 Water Colour Drawing, 142, 149 Watteau, 82, 193 Whistler, 206 Wrist, 26 1^1 li