Production Note Cornell University Library pro- duced this volume to replace the irreparably deteriorated original. It was scanned using Xerox soft- ware and equipment at 600 dots per inch resolution and com- pressed prior to storage using CCITT Group 4 compression. The digital data were used to create Cornell's replacement volume on paper that meets the ANSI Stand- ard Z39.48-1984. The production of this volume was supported in part by the Commission on Pres- ervation and Access and the Xerox Corporation. Digital file copy- right by Cornell University Library 1991.(QatneU Htuuersity Hthcary Stbara, Njhj Ifark FROM THE BENNO LOEWY LIBRARY COLLECTED BY BENNO LOEWY 1854-1919 BEQUEATHED TO CORNELL UNIVERSITYMARY WOLLSTONECRAFT SHELLEY BY HELEN MOORE. PHILADELPHIA: J. B. LIPPINCOTT COMPANY. 1886.Copyright, 1886, by Helen Moore.TO Iv C. MPREFATORY NOTE. I wish to acknowledge my indebtedness to Mr. Tiffany and to Mr. Cutter, Librarians of the Boston Public and Athenaeum Libraries, for the kindness with which they have aided in procuring books not other- wise accessible to me. I am beside indebted to Mr. C. Kegan Paul for making clear to me some passages in the lives of the Shelleys upon which otherwise I could not have spoken with decision. I wish also to express my thanks to Lady Shelley for her courteous interest, and especially for confirm- ing the impression I had formed of Mary Shelley’s disposition, which, coming to me while weighing the force of Trelawny’s attacks upon her memory, was peculiarly grateful, and enabled me to place the two estimates side by side. H. M. Philadelphia, 1886. 5CONTENTS. PAGE Introductory ....................................... 9 CHAPTER I.—Parentage and Early Life......................17 II. —Percy Bysshe Shelley.........................51 III. —Union with Shelley..........................60 IV. —Life in England—Marriage....................72 V.—Italy.........................................96 VI.—Shelley’s Death..............................144 VII.—“ Frankenstein,” and other Writings . . . 244 VIII.—Return to England—Death......................289 7INTRODUCTORY. No life of Mrs. Shelley has hitherto been published, a fact sufficiently surprising in an age that is nothing if not poly-biographical. The period from 1851, the date of her death, to the present time has been pecu- liar, quite as much for the thoroughness with which it has exhausted the immediate past for subjects for biography, as for the minuteness with which it has pursued those subjects when found. Moreover, within this period there has been at least one distinct Shelley revival. This critical habit of biography, as well as the minute method of poetic criticism, requires of us the knowledge of everything that went to form the environment of the poet, demanding that we shall search for the source of every influence that moulded his life and thoughts. There has been no dearth of biographies of Shelley, nor is there anywhere a denial of the part that Mary Shelley bore toward the period of his best poesy, in the spiritual uplifting of the poet’s hands when disease and disaster rendered physical aid vain. On the contrary, there is a generalIO INTRODUCTORY. recognition of this; yet next to nothing is given us from which independently we can form any estimate of her who was thus a force in his life. Nowhere is there gathered into one volume the records of her life. In biography she has hitherto had no separate existence, no individuality. But while this is certainly surprising, it is not with- out an explanation,—an explanation lying strangely enough in the fact that she was Mrs. Shelley; for the true reason why we find no life of her separate from Shelley, is because in a sense she had no separate life. Before he came her life was empty; after his death it was the tomb from which her lord had risen. Be- tween these two periods she lived,—lived for him and because of him. It must not be inferred from this that she was one of those natures who, without mind of their own, simply respond to the touch of a stronger hand. Her vigorous intellect, her individuality, her cour- age, as marked as that of any of the world’s heroines, should put that question at rest; but this intellect and courage, this strong personality, were latent; nothing in her life had called them into being. Too remark- able to be ever commonplace, the people and events of her life awakened in her no response. They came and went and left her as they found her. But just in proportion as she was thus indifferent to common things about her, to that extent was sheINTRODUCTORY. II able to respond and to awaken response in the rare nature of Shelley. The union of these two was like the chemic union of a base, separately inert, but which combined became a potent force. In that union she realized her true life; into it her separate being merged. The life of Mrs. Shelley thus pre- sents the truly womanly life,—that complementary one, to which a perfect union (what so rare!) gives a vigor, an individuality, a beauty, denied to those lives which spend themselves in unmated unions or in single-hand combats with the world. While it is true that Mrs. Shelley’s place among eminent women does not rest upon the circumstance that she was Shelley’s wife, it is in every sense due to the fact that she was his companion. The nature and quality of this companionship is at once an index and a test of her character. It was not that an erratic genius had made her the object of his wayward pas- sion, or even that she was the recipient of his genuine tenderness. It was very much more than this. Think how different Mrs. Shelley’s place from that held by any of the various loves of Goethe or Byron. It may not be overstating it to say that one of the chief interests we have in her, arises from a worthy cu- riosity to know what manner of woman it was who could be so completely the companion, who could hold such close fellowship with so marked a genius as Shelley. It is for this reason that his character12 INTRODUCTORY. must ever be a prominent element in the life of Mrs. Shelley. For the same reason, due prominence must be given to the nature of that union which welded these twain together in a spiritual oneness so instant, an intellectual harmony so complete,—in fine, a union so unlike those ordinarily made on earth, and so like those which we are told are made in Heaven, that an inconsequential world promptly decided that it had been made in Hell. Certainly, Mrs. Shelley does not owe her fame to the extent of her literary labors. Of these we shall do more than merely speak, finding in one of them— “ Frankenstein”—a peculiar literary faculty. But she must be ranked among those literary women whose true province is to influence and stimulate others; who are receptive, appreciative, and incentive, rather than productive; for among the distinguished women of the world there is a manifest division, based upon this feature, and not so apparent among men. Men may, it seems, be at once possessed of the power and faculty of literary production, and at the same time exert the maximum of influence upon their personal surroundings, as Milton, Pope, Rous- seau, Goethe, Byron, Carlyle, Emerson, and Shelley himself. But women possessed of the intellectual timbre, styled literary, fall naturally into two .classes, one possessed of a power to produce beyond the scope made apparent by their personal influence,INTRODUCTORY. 13 which may even give no promise of such power; the other owning and wielding a far greater influ- ence over men about them, which gives richer promise, but which fails to transmute itself into a permanent literary yield. Of the former class are George Eliot, Charlotte Bronte, Mrs. Browning, Miss Austin, while in the latter class are Margaret Fuller, Mary Woll- stonecraft, Madame de Stael, Madame Recamier, and a host of French women, of whom Madame Du Def- fend may be taken as the type. Without doubt it is to this latter class that Mrs. Shelley must be assigned; so that in proportion as her permanent contribution to the literary stock of the world is small, must we the more earnestly seek in her private life and its reflected lights, for those qualities which have made her unquestionably emi- nent among women. The intimate blending of the influences which awakened the mind and formed the character of Mrs. Shelley make the study of her life peculiarly difficult, and necessitate a broader treatment in accord with the responsive nature of her growth. Thus our study becomes largely an inquiry into the factors of her life; Fortunately these factors are themselves in- tensely interesting persons, so that the time spent with them is a period spent with people quite as re- markable and almost as admirable as Mary Shelley herself; for it is from the characters of Mary Woll-H INTRODUCTORY. stonecraft, William Godwin, and Percy Bysshe Shelley that we must learn the influences that shaped and re- appeared in the life of the daughter of the first and the wife of the last. What wonder if the being so endowed possessed the beauty, the charm, the passion, the courage, the mental vigor, the sincerity of her mother,—the amiability, the reasonableness, the in- dustry, and the subtle analytical powers of her father ? If to these we add the companionship, the spiritual rapport, the enthusiasm, the elevation of thought, the pantheistical love of the beautiful, and those nameless forces evolved only in the perfect union of mind and soul which first drew and then held her and Shelley together, we shall have but one regret, that at best we can learn all too little of the life of Mary Woll- stonecraft Shelley.“ They say that thou wert lovely from thy birth, Of glorious parents, thou aspiring Child. I wonder not, for one then left this earth Whose life was like a setting planet mild, Which clothed thee in the radiance undefiled Of its departing glory; still her fame Shines on thee thro’ the tempests dark and wild Which shake these latter days; and thou canst claim The shelter, from thy Sire, of an immortal name.” Shelley.MARY WOLLSTONECRAFT SHELLEY. CHAPTER I. PARENTAGE AND EARLY LIFE. Mary Wollstonecraft Godwin, the daughter of Mary Wollstonecraft and William Godwin, was born on the 30th of August, 1797, in Polygon, Somers- town, London. Her father was the son of a dissent- ing minister in Wisbeach, Cambridgeshire, and had had the education common to the sons of the country clergy,—that is, in his extreme youth he went to a good old village dame, who, with aged and trembling voice, taught him his letters, and sought, by “ godly and pious books for the young,” to impress upon his youthful mind the importance of religion. After a few months of this good woman’s instruc- tion, he was sent to a day-school at some distance from his home. Here, it is related, appalled by the sinful irreligion of one of his comrades, he spent much of his time in preaching to him about “ death 2 17i8 PARENTAGE AND EARLY LIFE, and damnationhaving appropriated all the austere Calvinist doctrines of his father, he held them over the head of the sinful boy. He stealthily procured the key to his father’s church, and there, in the pulpit, did he with serious ardor recount to his trembling audience of one the fearful consequences of his guilt. In the autumn of 1773, William Godwin went to Hoxton College, where he remained five years. He had intended to become a dissenting minister, like his father, and during his summer vacations and after his departure from college he had the care of a parish and preached occasionally; but it does not appear that he was ever more than a candidate. In 1785, Godwin took permanent lodgings in Lon- don and began that career of letters and that struggle with poverty which ended only with his life. He was first known as a valuable political writer on the Liberal side, and by virtue of his political opinions began to collect around him that circle of friends which he carefully extended until it comprehended all those best known in literature and politics. He was the writer of several books, the principal one being “ Political Justice.” This was published in 1793, and immediately went through three editions. Of his other works, his two novels, “ Caleb Williams” and “ St. Leon,” the “ Answer to Malthus,” and the “ His- tory of the Commonwealth of England,” are perhaps all that are now remembered.PARENTAGE AND EARLY LIFE. 19 As the author of “ Political Justice,” he takes a high place among elemental thinkers. Every original and earnest writer has one work on which he has expended the best of his faculties, the most careful and logical conclusions of his mind. The names of Adam Smith, Hume, Darwin, Milton, Goethe immediately suggest to one the name of that work by which each is best known, that work into which each threw the weight of his vigor and genius. “ Political Justice” made no little stir among thoughtful persons. It is an inquiry into the society, government, and morals of a community; it contains broad and uncompromising theories, for Godwin was not the man to shrink from any conclusion to which his reason brought him. He was a logical and cour- ageous thinker, a fearless advocate of equity, an en- thusiast in the cause of just liberty of thought and action. He cried out, if any of Godwin’s calm and moderately expressed sentences can be called a cry, against the constraints of law, government, and society. He believed that in time, education and environment would teach each man to rule himself; that self- government is the only real government. Many of Godwin’s theories were extreme and futile, many bore the stamp of truth which time and custom have now demonstrated. “ Political Justice” in a measure prepared the social and moral atmosphere in which we now live, as did “ Emilie” the educational,20 PA RENTA GE AND EARLY LIFE. and Darwin’s “ Origin of Species” the scientific. The present generation is prone to underrate the value of a work whose once rare and startling precepts are now familiar and accepted. Godwin was a man who possessed many lovable traits of mind and character. He was gentle and con- siderate of the feelings of others, cheerful and even in disposition, philosophic in temperament, and to a moderation that amounted to coldness, he united an enthusiasm for the good. As a natural complement to these qualities, he had an inordinate vanity, arj over keen and exaggerated sense of others’ opinions of him- self, together with a disposition to magnify the uncon- scious phrases of his friends into intended slights. In many of the relations of life he exhibited higli-souled and amiable benevolence, and whenever he saw an occasion of aiding a friend or fellow, by counsel or ap- preciation, by gifts, by well-timed and expressed sym- pathy, he forthwith offered the same. He was, too, in all political oppression, intrepid and morally cour- ageous. Once, indeed, early in his career, he placed himself in imminent danger of transportation, by throw- ing himself athwart Parliament, and doing disinterest- edly all within his power to frustrate a governmental sentence which seemed to him unjust. This sense of justice was an engrossing passion of Godwin’s life, than which none was stronger, not even his sensitive vanity. That moral courage which in youth was both noblePARENTAGE AND EARLY LIFE. 21 and active, lost in old age its unconditioned fearless- ness, and expressed itself only in theoretical and ab- stract disquisitions and prudent and wordy counsel. Thought in his late years lost the brooding concen- tration which produces action, and mayhap that clear and sunlike vision of nice questions grew dim and obscured, more commonplace and conformable to the opinions of those around him. Nor is it surprising that such should have been the result in a nature like Godwin’s. He no longer had the elasticity of en- thusiasm, and his vanity and extreme sensitiveness to disapprobation lacked the reassuring support of Mary Wollstonecraft’s companionship. The present generation owes much to Godwin’s clear and discriminating intellect. It was at his suggestion that the “ Tales from Shakespeare,” by Charles and Mary Lamb, were written. He first directed the at- tention of the English mind to the beauties of “ Don Quixote,” and he insisted that Chapman’s “ Homer” was one of the treasures of the English language. Godwin’s reading was vast and discursive. The methodical character of his mind is shown by his minutes of the number of pages read in a day, of letters and visitors received; and his vanity, by the preservation of all papers pertaining to himself, and careful copies of his own letters. Speaking of the routine of her father’s life, Mrs. Shelley writes thus: “ He rose between seven and eight, read some clas-22 PARENTAGE AND EARLY LIFE. sic author before breakfast. From nine till twelve or one he occupied himself with his pen. He found that he could not exceed this measure of labor with any advantage to his own health or the work in hand. The rest of the morning was spent in reading or seeing his friends. When at home he dined at four, but dur- ing his bachelor life he frequently dined out. His dinner at home at this time was simple enough. He had no regular servant; an old woman came in the morning to clean and arrange his rooms, and, if neces- sary, she prepared a mutton-chop, which was put in a Dutch oven.” His home and his scanty means were ever at the service of his many needy relatives. One of his prin- ciples of action was to acquire only the income neces- sary for his daily wants, and as his relatives made his house their rendezvous when in London, he was often- times in debt. Godwin was about forty at the time of his meeting ^ with Mary Wollstonecraft. He had long been con- l ^ templating with gracious favor the marriage state, and had asked his sister Hannah to select for him a wife, which office she eagerly endeavored to fulfil. Mean- while he had himself made some advances to a lady of his own acquaintance; but his friendship for Mary Wollstonecraft soon occupied his whole mind and heart. Mary Wollstonecraft was born in 1759. She alsoPARENTAGE AND EARLY LIFE. 23 was one of the forces that helped to mould the nine- teenth century. She also, like Godwin, strove to give freedom to men and women, and to make purity of motive the basis of morality. Through a varied and mournful life she always acted upon those principles which she believed highest. Her chief work is the “ Vindication of the Rights of Women;” and as God- win in his “ Political Justice," so did she throw into this book all the strength of her soul. Honestly, fearlessly, eloquently she treats of every subject she touches, from the education of children to the position of women. The book is crude, assertive, and inaccu- rate, but it is written with the imperious earnestness of a thoughtful and sincere mind. Mary Wollstone- craft was perhaps the most gifted woman of the eigh- teenth century,—of clear, penetrating insight, of re- markable energy of purpose, quick to perceive, quick to formulate, she struck out original lines of thought on every subject which she touched. Difficulties of all sorts beset her family and her home. Her father, a spendthrift and an inebriate, was violent and abusive in temper. Her mother was weak and tyrannical, and withal an invalid. There were small children to be provided for and the older ones to educate. Mary Wollstonecraft added to the income of the home by being teacher and governess, both in Ireland and England. She sacrificed health and time to do for her brothers and sisters. Many24 PARENTAGE AND EARLY LIFE. times the care of the whole wretched family rested on her brave young shoulders. In 1788 she came to London, and took lodgings in a lonely part of the city, near Blackfriars Bridge, there to support herself by magazine articles and transla- tions, and indeed to send most of her hard-earned means to her sisters and brothers, who ill repaid her for her noble care. With wretched health, in the midst of poverty and times of morbid despondency, ill clothed, ill nourished, she worked away over her translations and tales, bearing the still greater strain and anxiety of the calamities of her delinquent and disappointing family. Here it was, in these forsaken and out-of-the-way lodgings, that this gifted and struggling being wrote the “ Vindication of the Rights of Women.” It earned for her a rather formidable reputation. It was much too outspoken for the times. In December, 1792, Mary went to Paris. It was there that she met Gilbert Imlay, an American. Be- tween these two was soon formed a strong mutual attachment. A marriage in the then political state of France was next to impossible to a foreigner; besides, to Mary Wollstonecraft, who had in her own family and that of her friends seen so much anguish accrue from the marriage-tie, the bond of love seemed more sacred than civil contract. In the autumn of 1793 a daughter, Fanny, wasPARENTAGE AND EARLY LIFE. 25 born. Soon after, Imlay, engrossed in speculations away from Paris, his attachment gone, deserted mother and child. Heart-broken and bewildered, Mary Woll- stonecraft returned to England, once more and under darker griefs than before, to support herself and her child by her old occupation of literature. It was after this, after her return from a journey to Norway, after her final separation from Imlay, that Godwin met her, and that the acquaintance ripened into friendship. Mrs. Shelley writes thus of her mother: “Mary Wollstonecraft was one of those beings who appear once, perhaps in a generation to gild humanity with a ray which no difference of opinion nor chance of circumstance can cloud. Her genius was undeni- able. She had been bred in the hard school of adver- sity, and, having experienced the sorrows entailed on the poor and oppressed, an earnest desire was kindled within her to diminish their sorrows. Her sound understanding, her intrepidity, her sensibility, and eager sympathy stamped all her writings with force and truth, and endowed them with a tender charm that enchants while it enlightens. She was one whom all loved who had ever seen. Many years have passed since that beating heart has been laid in the cold still grave, but no one who has ever seen her, speaks of her without enthusiastic veneration. “Did she witness an act of injustice, she boldly came forward to point it out and induce its repara-26 PARENTAGE AND EARLY LIFE. tion. Was there discord among friends or relatives, she stood by the weaker party, and her earnest ap- peals and kindliness awoke latent affection and healed all wounds. ‘ Open as day to melting charity,’ with a heart brimful of generous affection, yearning for sympathy, she had fallen on evil days, and her life had been one course of hardship, poverty, lonely struggle, and bitter disappointment “ Godwin met her at the moment when she was deeply depressed by the ingratitude of one utterly incapable of appreciating her excellence; who had stolen her heart, and availed himself of her excessive and thoughtless generosity and lofty independence of character to plunge her in difficulties and then desert her. Difficulties—worldly difficulties, indeed—she set at naught, compared with her despair of good, her confidence betrayed, and, when once she could con- quer the misery that clung to her heart, she struggled cheerfully to meet the poverty that was her inheri- tance, and to do her duty by her darling child. It was at this time that Godwin again met her at the house of her friend, Mrs. Hayes, having done so occa- sionally before she went to Norway.” Godwin and Mary Wollstonecraft did not marry for some time. Mrs. Shelley writes, “ He was very averse to marriage. Poverty was a strong argument against it. When he concocted a code of morals in ‘ Political Justice,’ he warmly opposed a system whichPA RENTA GE AND EARLY LIFE. 27 exacted a promise to be kept to the end of life, in spite of every alteration of circumstance and feeling. Objections to marriage are usually expected to infer an approval and even practice of illicit intercourse. This was far from being the case with Godwin. He was in a supreme degree a conscientious man, ut- terly opposed to anything like vice or libertinism ; nor did his sense of duty permit him to indulge in any deviation from the laws of society, which, though he might regard as unjust, could not, he felt, be in- fringed without deception and injury to any woman who should act in opposition to them. The loss of usefulness to both parties, which the very stigma brings, the natural ties of children, entailing duties which necessitate the duration of any connection, and which, if tampered with, must end in misery. All these motives were imperative in preventing him from acting upon theories which yet he did not like to act against.” They were, however, married the 29th day of March, 1797, in St. Pancras Church, Godwin’s faithful friend, Marshall, and the parish clerk being the only witnesses. They still retained their separate lodgings, and their manner of life was much the same as it had been. Both had their own work, their own circle of friends, their own interests, and both regulated their time to their own wishes. Mary Wollstonecraft still kept up her writing and translations, and Godwin28 PARENTAGE AND EARLY LIFE. went every morning to his study in the Evesham Buildings. On the 30th of August, Mary Godwin, afterward Mary Shelley, was born, and a few days later Mary Wollstonecraft lay dead. She was buried in St. Pan- eras church-yard. After a few months of complete companionship with Mary Wollstonecraft, Godwin was left the mournful task of writing a sketch of her life, and of editing her unpublished writings. He at once brought his papers from the Evesham Buildings, and took up his abode with his two little children, Fanny, Imlay’s daughter, and Mary, his own child, in his wife's home. There he lived in a dreary, hap-hazard way, with the children and their nurses. One can imagine the dis- comfort that he suffered; his student-like, methodical habits disturbed, his time interrupted, his mind called away from his books to a thousand minor incidents, the whole care of the house falling on his shoulders. For, during Mary Wollstonecraft’s life, there had been absolutely no alteration in Godwin’s carefully regulated days; the care of affairs had devolved upon her. In the life of a man who had spent forty single and undisturbed years, whose habits had become crys- tallized, these demands must have made no small revolution. Certain it is that he either doubted his ability to care for this household, or that he had found a wife of inestimable value, for six months after MaryPARENTAGE AND EARLY LIFE, 29 Wollstonecraft’s death, after he had declared that his sorrow had no consolation, we find him sending im- portunate love letters and proposal of marriage to a lady whom he had seen just four times. Whatever the material loss Mary Wollstonecraft’s death was to her husband and children, of the spiritual and moral loss the half cannot be told. She was to Godwin a strong, broad, beautiful influence. She had more character, more purpose, more intimate sym- pathy with and knowledge of human nature than he, —she would have softened his pedantry, would have helped him to realize his dreams and theories of hu- manity. To her children she would have been friend and guiding star. She would have been like the gracious spirit that ever presided over the hearth-stones of the old Greeks, and her sweet presence and warm heart would have kept glowing and eternal that sacred fire. But her death changed all this not more than did Godwin’s second marriage in 1801. He had a large circle of friends, and shortly after his wife died he began to resume his visits to them. He frequently took little Fanny, to whom he was tenderly attached, with him when he dined out. Good friends of Mary Wollstonecraft and of Godwin, Mrs. Revely and Mrs. Fenwick, kept kindly over- sight of the little Mary, while Godwin was living thus alone in Polygon. And it was from Mrs. Revely,30 PA RENTA GE AND EARLY LIFE, afterwards Mrs. Gisborne, that Mary Shelley in later years learned all that she knew of her mother. Mrs. Shelley has left an interesting note of Mrs. Revely’s early life and her friendship with Godwin before his union with Mary Wollstonecraft. “ Maria Revely,” she writes, “ was the daughter of an English merchant at Constantinople, named James. Her edu- cation had been wild and singular, and had early de- veloped the peculiar and deep-seated sensibility which through life formed her character. Her father had left her in infancy with her mother in England,—he might be said to have deserted them, for they lived in great penury. She remembered once asking her mother for a farthing to buy a cake, which was given her with such reluctance, on the score of poverty, that with a passion of tears she returned it. Mrs. James at length took a desperate resolution and sailed to Constanti- nople with her daughter, then eight years old. Mr. James had no inclination to renew his conjugal duties. He had in his house the wife of one of his skippers as house-keeper, and it was generally believed that she stood to him in a more intimate relation. He was, however, delighted with his little daughter, and had her stolen from her mother and secreted in the house of a Turk, till he had persuaded Mrs. James, by the promise of an annuity, to return to England alone. The little Maria was then taken home and brought up with sedulous care. Many accomplishments werePARENTAGE AND EARLY LIFE. 31 taught her, and on one of the first side-saddles which appeared in the East she accompanied her father in his rides in the environs of Constantinople. While yet a mere child she looked womanly and formed, and entered into the society of European merchants and diplomatists. Having no proper chaperon, she was apt to run wild as she might, and at a very early age had gone through the romance of life. When she was fifteen her father left Constantinople and went to Rome. She had shown great talent for painting, and it was her wish that she should cultivate this art under the tuition of Angelica Kauffman. Her studies were, however, interrupted by her early marriage. Her beauty attracted the admiration of Mr. Revely, a young English architect travelling for improve- ment ; they married and came to England. “ Mr. Revely’s means were small, his father being still alive, and his marriage imprudent, for Mr. James, who acted ill in all the relations of life, refused to con- sent to the match, only, it would seem, as an excuse for giving his daughter no fortune. From the genial climate, the luxuries, the gay and refined society which had at times surrounded her, Mrs. Revely found her- self transported to a situation but little removed from penury, demanding an economy and a self-denial in ex- penditure of the most painful kind. She found herself among the middling class of English people, ignorant, narrow-minded and bigoted. She felt fallen on evil32 PARENTAGE AND EARLY LIFE. days ; the fairy lights had disappeared from life ; sedu- lous occupation bestowed on the necessaries of life was varied only by society which did not possess a ray of intellect and had but little refinement. “ She was very young and very beautiful, and pos- sessed a peculiar charm of character in her deep sen- sibility, and an ingenuous modesty that knew no guile; this was added to ardor in the pursuit of knowledge, a liberal and unquenchable curiosity. Parties ran high in those days. Her husband joined the Liberal side, and entered with enthusiasm into the hopes and ex- pectations of political freedom, which then filled every heart to bursting. The consequence of these princi- ples was to lead to the acquaintance of many of their popular advocates, and among them, with Godwin and Holcroft. There was a gentleness and yet a fervor in the minds of both Mrs. Revely and Godwin that led to sympathy. He was ready to gratify her desire for knowledge, and she drank eagerly of the philosophy which he offered. It was pure but warm friendship, which might have grown into another feeling had they been differently situated. As it was, Godwin saw only in her a favorite pupil, a charming friend, a woman whose conversation and society were fascinating and delightful; but his calm and philosophic heart was undisturbed by any of those feelings which in natures less happily tempered would too readily have stepped in to disturb and injure.”PARENTAGE AND EARLY LIFE. 33 Nevertheless, shortly after the loss of Mary Woll- stonecraft, after an unsuccessful attempt to marry Miss Lee, a lady whom he had seen but four times, accident disposing of Mr. Revely, Godwin within a month of his death importuned Mrs. Revely to become his wife. Though she had had little fondness for her husband, Mrs. Revely felt his loss keenly. “ From the cham- ber of death/' writes Mrs. Shelley, “ his widow rushed to a remote and desolate room at the top of the house, in a state bordering on frenzy: for a week she remained in the same place, in the same state. She and her hus- band had at times disagreed, and believed themselves unsuited to each other. But he was the husband of her early youth, the father of her adored son, the friend and companion of nearly fifteen years. She was en- dowed with the keenest sensibility, and her heart re- ceived a shock from which she could with difficulty recover. “ Mr. Godwin heard of Mr. Revely’s death at the house where he dined on the same day. He became thoughtful and entirely silent; he already revolved the future in his mind. Maria Revely had been a favorite pupil, a dear friend, a woman whose beauty and man- ners he ardently admired. After his wife’s death, his visits and attentions had excited Mr. Revely’s jealousy, and they became to a great degree discontinued. His uprightness and candor of character made him dis- dain the suspicions, but he withdrew, unwilling to be 334 PARENTAGE AND EARLY LIFE. the cause of domestic feud. It was, however, his plan to yield but little to form and etiquette, and before Mr. Revely had been dead a month he did not scruple to ask to see his widowed friend, and to make her under- stand the feelings and prospects with which his visits would be paid. She at first refused to see him and several letters passed between them.” “ You are invited to form the sole happiness/' writes the husband of Mary Wollstonecraft, six months after her death, to Mrs. Revely, “ of one of the most known men of the age, of one whose principles, whose tem- per, whose thoughts you have been long acquainted with, and will, I believe, confess their universal con- stancy. This connection I should think would restore you to self-respect, would give security to your future peace, and insure for you no mean degree of respecta- bility. What you propose to choose in opposition to this I hardly know how to describe to you. . . . How singularly perverse and painful is my fate. When all obstacles interposed between us, when I had a wife, when you had a husband, you said you loved me, for years loved me! Could you for years be deceived ? Now that calamity on the one hand, and no unpro- pitious fortune on the other have removed these ob- stacles, it seems your thoughts are changed, you have entered into new thoughts and reasonings.” And in his last letter to her he writes, “ You always professed the highest regard for Mrs. Godwin, naturally it wouldPARENTAGE AND EARLY LIFE. 35 be expected you should feel some interest in her chil- dren and mine: are these motives all at once become nothing to you ?” Godwin’s letters and entreaties could not prevail upon Mrs. Revely, and it was with real disappoint- ment that he learned of her marriage to Mr. Gisborne in the next year. He was very glad, during that sum- mer, 1800, to divert his mind by a visit to Ireland, where he spent six weeks. His home letters are play- ful and charming. “ Tell Mary I will not give her away, and she shall be nobody’s little girl but papa’s. Papa is gone away, but papa will very soon come back again, and see the Polygon across two fields from the trunks of the trees at Camden Town. Will Mary and Fanny come to meet me ?” “ I depute to Fanny and Mr. Collins, the gardener, the care of the garden. Tell her I wish to find it spruce, cropped, weeded, and mowed at my return, and if she can save me a few strawberries, and a few beans without spoiling, I will give her six kisses for them. But then Mary must have six kisses too, because Fanny has six.” “ And, now, what shall I say for my poor little girls ? I hope they have not forgotten me; I think of them every day, and should be glad if the wind was more favorable to blow them a kiss apiece from Dublin to Polygon. I have seen Mr. Grattan’s little girls, and36 PARENTAGE AND EARLY LIFE. Lady Mountcashers little girls, and they are very nice children, but I have seen none that I love half so well or think half so good as my own.” And this last note, “ Ah! poor Fanny, here is an- other letter from papa, and what do you think he says about the little girls in it? Would pretty little Mary have apprehension enough to be angry if I did not put in her name? Look at the map. This is Sunday that I am now writing. Before next Sunday I shall have crossed that place there, what you see marked as sea, between Ireland and England, and shall hope, indeed, to be half-way home. That is not a very long while, now, is it ? My visit to Ireland is almost done. Perhaps I shall be on the sea in a ship the very moment Marshall is reading this letter to you. There is about going in a ship in Mrs. Bar- bauld’s book. But I shall write another letter that shall come two or three days after this, and then I shall be in England. And in a day or two after that I shall hope to see Fanny and Mary and Marshall sitting on the trunks of the trees.” Of the gentle Marshall Mrs. Shelley has written, “ There was another man, a fellow-student, and an aspirant to the honors of literature. The booksellers of London in his day knew him well, and many a contemporary author fallen on evil days, many a widow and orphan had cause to remember the benev- olent disposition, the strenuous exertions, the kindPARENTAGE AND EARLY LIFE. 37 and intelligent countenance of James Marshall. His talents not permitting a higher range, he became a translator and index maker, a literary jobber. In a thousand ways he was useful to Godwin, who, sensi- tive, proud, and shy, whose powers of persuasion lay in the force of his reasoning, often found the more sociable and insinuating manners of his friend of use in transacting matters of business with editors and publishers. They often shared their last shilling together, and the success of any of his friend’s plans was hailed by Marshall as a glorious triumph. God- win, whose temper was quick, and, from an earnest sense of being in the right, somewhat despotic on occasions, assumed a good deal of superiority and some authority. Marshall sometimes submitted, some- times rebelled, but they were always reconciled at last, and the good-humored friend was always at hand to assist to the utmost Godwin’s more intellectual ex- ertions, in copying or in walking from one end of the town to the other.” In the spring of 1801, there arrived in the house next to the one in which Godwin lived with his odd family, which consisted of his instalments of country relatives,—of this faithful Marshall, who was devoted worshipper, enthusiastic friend, amanuensis, chief con- fidant, and literary hack, and with whom Godwin quarrelled as was his wont with every close friend,— of his two little girls and their nurse, the latter a lady,3« PARENTAGE AND EARLY LIFE. half house-keeper, half companion, who, sensitive and exacting, was jealous of Godwin’s comings and goings, who would not have been averse to being the next Mrs. Godwin, and was yet holding a sort of engage- ment with one of his young proteges,—there came to live in the house next to this heterogeneous family a lady, a widow, clever, energetic, and handsome. And it came about, that as the sage sat in his little balcony, where her fond eyes had doubtless seen him many times, the enthusiastic lady spake to him in these winged words: “ Is it possible that I behold the immortal Godwin ?” This honeyed phrase, which the immortal Godwin did not find cloying to his taste, began an acquaintance which at the end of the year resulted in marriage. The ceremony took place in Shoreditch Church, the faithful Marshall and the parish clerk, as at that earlier marriage, being the only witnesses. And this Mrs. Clairmont became the second Mrs. Godwin. That Godwin loved Mary Wollstonecraft as a man or a woman loves only once in a lifetime, I believe. Nevertheless there Vere many reasons that urged him to take unto himself another wife. In four years he had ceased to be romantic; he was now a cautious, thoughtful man of forty-four, who had an increasing respect for the institutions of society, and who felt the care of the two little girls to be beyond him. He wanted a wise and prudent house-keeper who at thePARENTAGE AND EARLY LIFE. 39 same time could bestow on his two children, daughters of that illustrious being, the minute attention due' to their material wants. Like a sensible man he married Mrs. Clairmont, the provident house-keeper, the care- taker whom he thought necessary for the welfare of his home, who would have for his children the solici- tude of a mother. Godwin always remained a man of much natural beauty of character, but he did succumb to all those prescriptions of society, not only in action but in honest thought, which as a younger person he had considered only the mutable institutions of man. He learned to consider of value that position and social standing which can only be held under the limitations of convention, on which he and Mary Wollstonecraft had expended so much subtile reason- ing and analysis. When in later years he writes to his daughter, Mrs. Shelley, “ be useful, be respectable, be happy,” one can see how vital had become to him the estimation of society. Mrs. Clairmont brought to Godwin’s home Charles and Jane, two children of her former marriage. This lady caused Mary Godwin real grief. She was to Mary, in her childhood, harsh, quick-tempered, unsympa- thetic ; in her girlhood she denied her every advan- tage and possibility that her rarely-endowed nature craved, estranging Godwin from his daughter’s true interest by her jealous disposition, and in after-life40 PARENTAGE AND EARLY LIFE. making the growing affection and companionship between father and daughter, by this same jealous interference, a matter of difference between Godwin and herself. Though she ever had an admiration for her hus- band, she was exacting and overbearing, ungenerous in her estimates, complaining and fretful in disposition, —pitifully unfit to take the charge of that household. To occupy the position of companion and adviser to three such sensitively organized beings as Godwin and Mary and Fanny, was to hold their happiness in her hands; for it virtually lies in the power of the woman to make the hearthstone a place of joy or of bickering unrest. That Mrs. Clairmont made this home very unhappy, and by her jealous interference often caused temporary estrangement between Godwin and his old friends, Lamb, Holcroft, and others who suffered at her hands give testimony. Lamb, in a fit of annoy- ance, writes of her to Coleridge as “ that d—d Mrs. Godwin.” At the time of his second marriage, and for a few years after, Godwin was involved in the most discour- aging pecuniary difficulties. His only means of sup- port was the income which he derived from his pen. His wife—energetic, mentally active, “a managing woman,” as she calls herself—therefore induced God- win, in 1805, to enter into the publishing business. He hired a small house in Hanway Street, Oxford Street,PA RENTA GE AND EARLY LIFE. 41 and under the name of his foreman, his own being in such ill odor on account of his radical opinions that it would have been disastrous to use it, began the busi- ness which involved him in lawsuits and financial calamities for years to come. He wrote and published, under the name of “ Baldwin’s Fables,” stories and histories for children,—charming little books they were, too,—on which work he and his wife expended much labor. Mrs. Godwin in the main had the supervision of the shop, and Charles Lamb complains pathetically of her wretched taste in publishing the “ Tales’^with some grotesquely inferior copperplate illustrations..... After awhile the publishing business increased, and it was necessary to remove it to larger quarters. It was established under the name of M. J. Godwin & Co., in a building in Skinner Street, Holborn, adjoin- ing which was a comfortable dwelling-house, to which, in the autumn of 1807, the family removed from the house in Somerstown, with its memories of Mary Wollstonecraft, memories of the companionship of the higher, wider life that Godwin had led under her influence. Were the associations of that place dear to Godwin ? They must have been to the little Mary, who it is said was so much like her dead mother. A child older in thought and feeling than her ten years would make her; loving, revering the character of her mother; with eager, imperious ways, mystic, shining eyes, fer-42 PARENTAGE AND EARLY LIFE. vent spirits, unloved by her step-mother, unappre- ciated by her father, she in the way peculiar to sensi- tive children must have brooded over the memories of that spot so endeared to her mother’s name, which had once been filled by her mother’s presence. Little Fanny Imlay, pliant and even in temperament, with sweet, womanly ways, who was three years Mary’s senior, must have remembered that mother, have been able to give to her sister faint impressions of a tender being who had moved about the rooms, who supplied her childish wants, who had sat writing at a certain table; perhaps there was one window at which the dimly-recalled being always wrote. Perhaps Fanny could even remember caresses and endearing words, for children remember such things. The shop in Skinner Street flourished, and one gets a pretty picture now and then of the family life; Godwin writing continuously; Mrs. Godwin taking oversight of the work in the building next; the chil- dren, Fanny, Mary, and the little William, who was born to Mrs. Godwin in 1803, saying their lessons. Charles Clairmont, a charming and intelligent boy, was at Charter-House School, and Jane, the eldest of the children, whose character was far from agreeable, had masters or outside education. Godwin’s life at this time was simple, his pleasures few. Business and domestic affairs pressed heavily upon him, though no nature was more cheerfully freePARENTAGE AND EARLY LIFE. 43 from useless pecuniary worry. If he had money he paid the bills when they fell due. If he had none himself he begged or borrowed it from his friends with perfect good feeling. It was only when such natural avenues of resource were closed to him that affairs demanded serious consideration. Thomas Noon Tal- fourd has left a charming description of this charac- teristic of Godwin’s. “ He asked his friends for aid without scruple/’ writes Talfourd, “ considering that their means were justly the due of one who toiled in thought for their inward life, and had little time to provide for his own outward existence; and took their excuses when offered without doubt or offence. The very next day after I had been honored and delighted by an intro- duction to him at Lamb’s chambers, I was made still more proud and happy by his appearance at my own on such an errand, which my poverty, not my will, rendered abortive. After some pleasant chat on in- different matters, he carelessly observed that he had a little bill for ^150 falling due on the morrow, which he had forgotten till that morning, and desired the loan of the necessary amount for a few weeks. At first, in eager hopes of being thus able to oblige one whom I regarded with admiration akin to awe, I began to consider whether it was possible for me to raise such a sum; but alas! a moment’s reflection sufficed to convince me that hope was vain, and I was obliged44 PARENTAGE AND EARLY LIFE. with much confusion to assure my distinguished vis- itor how glad I should have been to serve him, but that I was only just starting as a special pleader, was obliged to write for magazines to help me on, and had not such a sum in the world. ‘ Oh dear/ said the philosopher, ‘ I thought you were a young gentleman of fortune,—don’t mention it, don’t mention it; I shall do very well elsewhere;’ and then in the most gracious manner reverted to our former topics, and sat in my small room for half an hour as if to con- vince me that my want of fortune made no difference in his esteem.” Godwin’s evenings were spent in playing whist at home or in Lamb’s chambers at the Temple, receiving or making visits, or at one of the theatres, where he had free access. And every first night might find Godwin sitting sleepily back in his box unless roused to admiration by some unusual piece of acting, when he would thrust hi$ huge head forward, rub his hands delightedly, and exclaim “ Good, good!” Many were the games of whist that the children witnessed through the half-open door, or stole in noise- lessly like mice into the Skinner Street parlor to watch. Curiously and wonderingly did they regard the dis- tinguished visitors, Coleridge, Lamb, Hazlitt, so omi- nously silent over their handful of cards, till the little intruders were marshalled off to bed by the ever- watchful Mrs. Godwin, who returned to keep impa-PARENTAGE AND EARLY LIFE. 45 tient guard while game succeeded game into the roseate hours of dawn. Silent, especially uncommunicative, was Godwin’s after-dinner hour. It was his invariable custom to refresh himself with a nap at that time, and it is said that no amount of good company could keep him awake. Often at Lamb’s chambers, strangers were amazed to see the massive, protruding head of the philosopher sink quietly to rest between his shoul- ders, and the author of “ Political Justice” sleep as stupidly and profoundly as a child. He conversed but little among strangers, and his talk was of the simplest, most commonplace things. Very disappointing, this, to one who wished to hear the prophet in his inspired moments. As Mary was a delicate child, she was occasionally sent into Scotland. Great must have been her delight to escape from the close atmosphere of London and the reproofs of her step-mother. To Fanny, with her gentle disposition, the life at home meant accommodat- ing her own not strong will to that of Mrs. Godwin; to Mary it meant inward rebellion and repression of all her inclinations. Very little care was spent on the edu- cation of either of Godwin’s daughters, Mrs. Godwin discouraging any but household acquirements for them. It was her own daughter Jane, afterwards known by the self-adopted name of Claire, who received all the accomplishments which the slender means could afford.46 PARENTAGE AND EARLY LIFE. What wonder, then, that Mary rejoiced in her freedom from restraint, that she ran with outstretched arms and flying hair along the Scottish shore, that the rocks and waves at Broughty Ferry were her friends and companions, that the startled sea-birds and the old fishermen marvelled whether this swift- footed, light-haired being was sprite or woman! This child did not know that there, in her own little English isle, wandering about in the same restless, darting way, only among the haunts of men instead of in the free, salty winds of the Scottish coast, was a nature like her own, a mind which would understand her wild fancies,—yes, which also needed recognition. One can see her with her light, supple figure, stand- ing on the sea-washed, jagged rocks, her wind-swept hair, her beautiful gray eyes shaded by her hands, looking out towards the sea, her clothes fretted and tossed by the wind. What art thou looking for, thou wondrous child ? Thy Shelley comes not from over the sea. As the years increase, she whom they said was lovely from her birth grew more beautiful. At the age of fifteen she was of medium height, but so slender and willowy in figure as to appear tall. She had a remarkably fair skin and delicate features, a wide, calm brow, and light, waving hair. But her eyes gave ex- pression and mobility and an ever-varying charm to her face. When she was animated or excited thosePARENTAGE AND EARLY LIFE. 47 calm gray eyes turned dark brown and were lit up by an inward fire, her face was aglow, and her whole be- ing partook of the awakening. An irresistible vivac- ity inspired her manners. At about this time God- win received a letter from an unknown person, who, interested in the daughters of two such unusual people, was anxious to know how Mary Wollstonecraft’s edu- cational ideas had succeeded. One can see from the reply how much Godwin had changed, whether it was from the familiar contact of a mind less fine than his own, or from a careless acknowledgment of his duties, or from a growing acceptation of the prevailing modes of thought and education. In later years, after sorrow and separation had taught her to accommodate herself to his nature, rather than he to learn hers, Mary Godwin became tenderly attached to her father; but I doubt whether he had much intimate knowledge of his daughter when he wrote this letter: “ . . . Your inquiries relate principally to the two daughters of Mary Wollstonecraft. They are neither of them brought up with an exclusive attention to the system of their mother. I lost her in 1797, and in 1801 I married a second time. One among the mo- tives which led me to chuse this was the feeling I had in myself of an incompetence for the education of daughters. The present Mrs. Godwin has great strength and activity of mind, but is not exclusively a follower of their mother; and indeed, having formed48 PARENTAGE AND EARLY LIFE. a family establishment, without having a previous provision for the support of a family, neither Mrs. Godwin nor I have leisure enough for reducing novel theories of education to practice, while we both of us honestly endeavor, as far as our opportunities will permit, to improve the mind and characters of the younger branches of the family. “ Of the two persons to whom your inquiries relate, my own daughter is considerably superior in capacity to the one her mother had before. Fanny, the eldest, is of a quiet, modest, unshowy disposition, somewhat given to indolence, which is her greatest fault, but sober, observing, peculiarly clear and distinct in the faculty of memory, and disposed to exercise her own thoughts and follow her own judgment. Mary, my daughter, is the reverse of her in many particulars. She is singularly bold, somewhat imperious, and active of mind. Her desire of knowledge is great and her perseverance in everything she undertakes almost in- vincible. My own daughter is, I believe, very pretty. Fanny is by no means handsome, but in general pre- possessing.” That Godwin was a beneficent, mellow old man, growing wise and learned in book lore, that he was an easily satisfied member of the family, leaving the education of his daughters to the wife whom he had married for that purpose, is probably true; but that he was the friend and the chosen companion of hisPARENTAGE AND EARLY LIFE. 49 child, the close and affectionate observer of her char- acter, and that he followed out the kind of care which he and her mother would tacitly have approved, is to be doubted. Idealizing the memory of her mother, as she did afterward the memory of her Shelley, the child Mary was even less able to appreciate the virtues of the present Mrs. Godwin. There was no companionship between them, and the attitude of the two Mrs. God- wins was so essentially different that it would have taken a wiser head than the restless Mary’s to have reconciled or found equal good in the two natures. Godwin himself never tried to meet the question. With Mary Wollstonecraft’s death ended that intel- lectual life which they had had in common, and those peculiar ideas which they had shared together, and the child of that union, born under those influences, did not serve to keep alive those sensibilities and those ideas. Living in a world of imagination, weaving her weird fancies into stories, loving study and poetry, she spent all her spare time in the long summer days with her book, beside her mother’s grave, in St. Pancras church- yard. All her literary delights disapproved of by her step-mother, rebuked when seen with a book in her hand, and told that in the store-room were fitter occu- pation, how many, many times must the sensitive, high-spirited girl have gone to her mother’s grave, 450 PARENTAGE AND EARLY LIFE. and, with tears in her heart, have prayed to that beau- tiful influence to understand and guide her. Mary Godwin felt that she was like her mother. And the rebukes about her reading, the reproach at her un- housewifely ways,—might not also the same fault have been found with Mary Wollstonecraft ? How distant, then, how isolated from the present Mrs. Godwin, how much nearer was she drawn to her own mother. If it was necessary to choose between the idea of good that Mrs. Godwin pointed out, and the ideal of good that Mary Wollstonecraft embodied, and she must choose, for the ideas were too opposite to reconcile, could she do else than cling to the mem- ory of her mother ? Thus it was that she grew up and passed from childhood into girlhood. And thus it was that Shel- ley first saw her at the age of fifteen, a beautiful, rest- less girl, singular and gifted, but hardly more than the child which he considered her to be.CHAPTER II. PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY. Percy Bysshe Shelley was born on the 4th of Au- gust, 1792, at Field Place, Sussex. He was the eldest son of Mr. Timothy Shelley. As this gentleman fig- ures somewhat prominently in the latter part of Mary Shelley’s life, it will be as well once for all to devote a few words to his character and disposition. If it were not for the extreme looseness of the expression, he might be dismissed with the remark that he was the conventional type of the commonplace English country gentleman. To be somewhat more explicit, Sir Timothy, as he afterwards became, was a robust, self-assertive islander, of. fair mind, well posted rather than cultured, not without a slight literary perception, but without the faintest literary faculty or appreciation, a practical householder and agriculturist. With his equals his conduct was a mixture of complaisance and unreason- ableness; to his inferiors he was well-meaning but overbearing; to his superiors, subservient. In all re- lations of life he was limited, intolerant, and conserva- tive. 5i52 PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY. With his son Percy he lacked all possible grounds of sympathy or understanding,—a condition of things of which Mary Shelley partook the fruits, and of which she bitterly reaped the harvest. Sir Timothy, being such as has been said, married a lady of unusual beauty of face and person, of a mild disposition, of narrow mind, and of no decided char- acter. From this union came seven children, Percy Bysshe being the eldest. Of the remaining, five were girls. It was evidently not from his immediate progenitors that the poet derived his peculiar temperament and organization. If we look one generation back, we can discover at least the source of the family name Bysshe, and with it obtain a possible clew to certain family traits. Sir Timothy’s father, and the grand- father of the poet, was Sir Bysshe Shelley. He was a character in his way, very unlike his son Timothy, being quite as eccentric as the latter was common- place. He was still living when Mary Godwin ac- cepted the hand and love of his namesake and grand- son. Sir Bysshe was a tall, handsome, clever old man, a baronet, and the founder of a family which received a further baronetcy and a peerage. A gentleman of the old school, tolerant, himself liberal and independent. He married in turn two English heiresses, with both of whom he eloped, and rumor whispers of an Ameri-PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY. 53 can wife antedating both of the English ones. As Shelley phrases it, his “ grandfather behaved badly to three wives.” It is also to be mentioned that two of the baronet's daughters eloped in marrying. For years before his death the old gentleman was not on good terms with his son Timothy, whom on occasions he would curse to his face. Between the old baronet and his grandson Percy there was neither sympathy nor aversion, rather mutual non-interference. At his death, in 1815, Sir Bysshe left his son Timothy one of the wealthiest heirs in England, three hundred thousand pounds sterling in the funds and rentals; twenty thousand pounds per annum being the esti- mate of his estates. Such was the immediate ancestry of Percy Bysshe Shelley. The youthful Bysshe, as he was called, early went through the schooling of an English upper-class lad, passing to Eton in his fourteenth year, and there re- maining until he went up to Oxford at the age of eighteen. But no ordinary boyhood was thus spent. Early a vigorous personality and a restless spirit, re- bellious against the powers that be and institutions that are, showed itself,—at home against restraints and rules parental, at school against established usages, pre-eminently the fagging system, to which not for one moment would he submit. Early, too, the liter- ary and poetic penchant developed, a strange faculty54 PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY. of the imaginative order, verbal fluency, and the itch of writing. Numerous ridiculous romances, notably “ Zastrossi” and “ St. Irvynne,” were produced, and even saw the light through a credulous and never-to- be-paid publisher. Also numberless poems, not now to be heard of. Early, too, atheistical tendencies—a certain innate inability to accept the Christian religion as anything more than a string of commingled fables and formulae—developed and attached to him, never to be loosed, rather strengthening with his growth. Many beautiful traits of heart and character devel- oped in the growing boy,—great sincerity, earnestness, and enthusiasm, capability for warm friendship, and an intense, almost fierce, love of truth. He was a lad of generous impulses and unselfish, at least in motive, —a reservation necessary from the fact that a constitu- tional recklessness of himself extended to and included others, often entailing troubles to those nearest and dearest. At Oxford the boy grew into the man, and there arose the Shelley that the world knows. Here, too, it was that the incident of the expulsion for atheism occurred. Not a thing to be wondered at on the one hand, nor to be greatly censured on the other. The arguments of Hume had to the young Shelley ap- peared so unanswerable that he, with the aid of his friend Hogg, had made an abstract of them, and had caused it to be printed, with the heading, “ The Ne-PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY. 55 cessity for Atheism.” This pamphlet, or thesis, he disseminated with a much too open hand. The alarming brochure coming to the knowledge of the board of college authorities, they summoned Shelley before them and questioned him as to his part in its authorship. Whatever he may have said, or refused to say, the practical fact remains that he was expelled because of his connection therewith, his father and all other good Britons regarding him with feelings which found vent in words both written and spoken. “ Queen Mab” belongs to the beginning of his Ox- ford life, the notes to which, in so far as they relate to the anti-Christian idea, are said to be taken from the famous “ Necessity for Atheism.” In one of these notes marriage is strongly condemned as subversive of all love and natural feeling, and a most vehement ap- peal is made for an overturning of so “ degrading an institution.” But “ Queen Mab,” though printed, was not published; it was, however, privately distributed. Nor did Shelley ever recant any of the views expressed in the notes. Thus hurried out into the world, ill equipped, imma- ture, his almost immediate act is to elope with Harriet Westbrook. This young girl was decidedly his in- ferior in social rank, and lacked in all respects the qualities of mind which characterized the young Shel- ley. He made her acquaintance in this wise. After his expulsion his father cut off his allowance, and hisPERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY. 56 sisters for a time supplied him from their own slender portions with such sums as they were able. Harriet Westbrook was the messenger who brought these sisterly remittances to Shelley. She was a handsome girl of a pink-and-white complexion and soft brown hair. Her father was a retired hotel keeper, late of the “ Mount Street Coffee-House.” Her mother was a nonentity. But her sister, Eliza, who came after- wards and lived with Shelley, was no nonentity; she proved a stubborn fact. She was twice Harriet's age, with dark eyes, stiff black hair, her form was angular and her face pock-marked. Much of Shelley’s boy love had been expended upon his cousin, Harriet Grove. Now she was about to marry,—a circumstance not without its influence, probably an exaggerated one, upon Shelley’s conduct. Harriet Westbrook was, as we know, attractive in appearance; she was more; she was, for a girl of six- teen, quite well instructed, one could scarcely say edu- cated. She was a good deal of a reader; her tem- perament was cheerful, and her disposition of that negative, insensible sort which passes for amiable. Her family were by no means loth to see her receive the attentions of the grandson and heir prospective to a wealthy baronet. Thus circumstances threw Harriet and Shelley to- gether, and for a time the young man found interest in dazzling her with his speculations and advancedPERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY. 57 ideas, to which she soon became a passive convert. Harriet’s family were rigid Methodists; she appears, however, to have had no decided religious leanings. Enthusiastic love for her Shelley did not have, but she certainly possessed for him the attraction that a pretty young girl of sixteen has for a young fellow of nine- teen ; then pity and a certain heroic desire to protect her added the needed climax. After a few visits paid her at her father’s house the young girl went back to school. A few letters from Harriet to Shelley telling of illness and of family unkindness, coercion, and in- compatibility; finally, one throwing herself upon his protection, and offering to fly with him,—then the elopement. Harriet could scarcely at first have aspired to be Shelley’s wife, knowing as she did his aversion to marriage upon principle; so that the Scotch marriage may fairly be attributed to his sense of the chivalrous. That all of this was hasty, ill advised, and erratic, no one has ever denied; that Shelley was the main or responsible actor in the drama is in no sense true; fidelity to fact must deny to Harriet the pose of an injured and credulous innocent. Nor is there any reason why we should hesitate to recognize the no- bility of Shelley’s part. That it was prudent no one claims. Once married the young couple secured lodgings in London, and entered upon an existence of poverty58 PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY. and perpetual embarrassment. It would serve no purpose to enter into the details of Shelley’s life dur- ing this period. It was simply miserable. Hard as it is to quench the animal spirits and the inborn op- timism of a young and ardent nature, things so ar- ranged themselves, or failed to be arranged, that all of Shelley’s real and better nature slept, rarely waking to the light. Family feuds and bitterness, cramping poverty, restless, ill-directed energies, the visit to Ire- land, impossible sorties against the ills of the world, pamphlets and dissertations for the most part of no permanent or even temporary value fill up this inter- val. The poetic sense lay dormant, imagination re- fused to act among such plethora of unpleasant realities. Not least of these was Eliza Westbrook. Early she came and settled down upon the Shelleys, assumed control of the house, dominated the passive Harriet, doled out the slender stock of funds, and rendered Shelley’s life even darker than it otherwise was, as the cuttlefish will ink even muddy water. Slowly but surely there dawned upon Shelley’s mind the certainty that his wife was not only a creature of different mould from himself, uninspiring, uncompan- ionable, but commonplace, almost unendurable to him. Seeds such as these grow without watering. And yet the year 1814, the third of Shelley’s married life, opens with an incident that looks the very reverse ofPERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY. 59 the separation about to follow. Shelley, in August, 1813, had come of age, and thereupon, March 24, 1814, he remarries Harriet, the ceremony being performed at St. Georges, Hanover Square. But though this second marriage established without doubt the legiti- mate claim of her son to the family estates, it in no way altered Harriet’s position toward Shelley. The rift widened till they drifted apart altogether, Harriet returning to her father’s house.CHAPTER III. UNION WITH SHELLEY. In i8i i, Shelley, like so many other earnest young men, sought the friendship of Godwin, the writer of “ Political Justice.” To him in times of doubt and distrust men turned, as they did in days of old to the Delphian Oracle. Both by letter and personal com- munication Godwin was adviser and friend of many a tumultuous, headstrong youth. His sympathy was warm, his judgment good, his advice conscientious. Shelley kept up an active correspondence with him some months before they met in October, 1812. At that time Shelley and his family spent six weeks in London, and they were almost daily visitors in Skin- ner Street. During the summer of 1813, Shelley was again in London for a short while, and at the time, or imme- diately after, Mary, who was not strong, went again to Scotland with her father’s old friends, Mr. Baxter and his daughter. Dear indeed must have been those jour- neys to Dundee, those months spent at Broughty Ferry, with its familiar wild coast cliffs, so like the rugged scenes of the Lerici of after-days. She spent 60LN10N WITH SHELLEY. 6l the winter with her warm-hearted Scotch friends, who loved the child for the sake of the mother, to whom they had been tenderly attached. It was after her return in the spring of 1814 that Shelley saw her again, and found that the gifted girl, who a few months before had impressed him as only a child, had now become the woman who was for him the all upon earth. How must she have grown in the few months in which she knew Shelley! Nature makes no leaps, unless it be when she makes the child a woman. If love can make the bad good, the foolish wise, the coward brave, the selfish forgetful of self, the cruel humane, can it not make out of a gifted girl a woman of genius ? From the moment that Mary Godwin came under the in- fluence of Shelley, from the moment that she awoke to the sense of a living companionship, of a friendship with this radiant spirit,—she was receiving impres- sions, learning truths that outstripped all that she had ever gained. A month—two—were to her years of ordinary growth. And whether she loved him before her journey into Scotland, or whether it was when she returned to London in the spring and their acquaint- ance began to grow into friendship, from the first mo- ment that she saw him she had begun to develop in mind and character with giant strides. Long before either is conscious of it, there is some subtile influence at work drawing two souls together,62 UNION WITH SHELLEY. bringing to each heart the same needs, to each brain giving the same thoughts, coloring the two minds with the same impressions, teaching them the same truths, isolating these two beings by their very af- finity from the world around them. After the divine laws, which work silently but surely, have been pre- paring these two hearts and brains, then consciousness awakes, and that union comes which is called love, and that which is the result of all those subtile causes is itself considered a cause. Is there not some prenatal influence which shapes two souls the one for the other ? Do they not wander stumblingly through life till they meet ? And by the grace of those inscrutable spiritual laws, at the first touch of the hand, the first encounter of ideas, the first searching look of the eyes, is not a divination of fellowship flashed in upon them ? Were not the years preparing Heloise and Abelard for one another? Was not nature in her silent way shaping Heloise to be the fit companion for the mightiest mind of the age? If love depends upon propinquity or chance, Leander had found some fair maid on his own side the Hellespont. Or instead of Dante burying his love for the beautiful Beatrice deep in his heart, only to release it in immortal song, could he not have contented himself with some other Florentine lady? Was there none save the gentle Colonna to inspireUNION WITH SHELLEY. 63 and subdue Michael Angelo ? Why did Antony traverse so many miles of sea to find his fate in Egypt’s queen ? Was Athens so sparse of women that Pericles must bring his Aspasia from Miletus ? When Mary Godwin, in April, 1814, came back to her father’s house in Skinner Street, she found Shelley established there as a constant visitor. In early spring Shelley had come up to London with his wife, and taken lodgings, the indefatigable Eliza still in at- tendance. Harriet spent much of her time with her Mount Street relatives; Shelley finding the little par- lor in Skinner Street an oasis of delight after the wretchedness of his own home. Trelawny has left a picture of the meeting of Shelley and Mary Godwin in the Skinner Street study, gathered from remarks made to him in later years by Mary herself. In that little parlor over the shop Godwin sat one evening with the five children who composed his family. The philosopher was reading in a didactic manner to his daughter, who sat next him. All was hushed and quiet, when the door suddenly opened, and a tall, thin man, with radiant face and lustrous eyes, entered. Godwin introduced him to his daughter. Shelley flushed at seeing the daughter of Mary Wollstone- craft, who was his ideal of womankind, and whose picture hung in the room. He began talking to Mary immediately, but Godwin soon interrupted with some criticisms on poetry, saying that prose was64 UNION WITH SHELLEY. Shelley’s forte. Hereupon the poet launched forth upon the subject of poetry; but Mary, who knew that her father had a contempt for all except dramatic poetry, turned the conversation to topics of the day in which they could all join, and then the talk became general. But Mrs. Godwin, who had taken in the whole scene with perceptive eyes, was not appeased. She, her children, had been completely overlooked. Not one word had been addressed to them, and her self-love was sorely wounded. In the middle of June, Shelley left Harriet, who re- turned to her father’s house. Though there was no form or word of separation, and though they both probably expected to live together again, both were aware of their entire unfitness for one another, and the discord could only grow more marked. He gave promise of a brilliant future, but Shelley above all other men needed favorable influences under which to work, and his union with Harriet was a hindrance to all high intellectual achievement. He was brought into intimate contact with people and questions that produced nothing but irritation. His recent journey to Ireland for the purpose of giving moral and substantial aid to the unhappy people there had been entirely unsuccessful. His failure to make himself and his motives understood, where he had the burning desire to accomplish a moral and material good, the suspicious reception of his offers, and theUNION WITH SHELLEY. 65 smiles of ridicule at his enthusiasm, all had in them, to the sensitive Shelley, elements of poignant grief. To a mystic and poetic temperament, and singular clearness of mind, he united a profound and impas- sioned earnestness, integrity of purpose, a disinterested love of his fellows, an engrossing, though often blind, desire to better their condition. But he lacked pur- pose and was often controlled by enthusiasm and im- pulse. He was regarded with animosity and harshness by his family, cast out from society by what was termed his atheism, having just escaped from the entangle- ment of a designing family in Wales who had attached themselves to his fortunes, fearing to trust new friends, sick at heart with himself and the world, it was thus that he now found Mary Godwin, at the time when human companionship was most needed, when he seemed farthest from finding it. Mary Godwin had always heard him spoken of in the family as a high-minded soul, who had vague but beautiful ideals. Had not her own mother had those same illusive dreams? Had not she, like Shelley, had a burning desire to do good to her kind, and had she not also been looked on with disfavor and suspi- cion for her very adherence to truth ? Mary Godwin could bring an offering to Shelley of a mind full of understanding, a heart full of sympathy and repressed love. By her very parentage, and from 566 UNION WITH SHELLEY. her life and thoughts, had she been formed to under- stand him. What wonder, as she poured out her im- pressions to him, as she revealed her own wide sym- pathy and intelligence, as she turned her appreciative and glowing eyes upon him, that Shelley felt the rest- ful influence of this being ? What was Mary Godwin's joy, when she discovered that the man whom she con- sidered noblest and greatest, found delight in her com- panionship,—she yet a child! What queen had state more elevated, homage more sweet? Then the child leaped into the woman, and if it was the child who loved Shelley, it was the woman who gave herself to him. Godwin became displeased at Shelley’s marked at- tentions to his daughter, and requested his visits to be less frequent. He did everything in his power to restore harmony between Harriet, who was then in London, and Shelley, and his journal records a talk with Mary and a letter to Shelley on the same day. Shelley, realizing the justice of the demand, and over- whelmed by the sense of his own civil obligations to Harriet, carried about with him the appearance of one distraught. One eventful day in July, whether by chance or otherwise I know not, he found Mary Godwin, as was so oft her wont in the long summer days, beside her mother’s grave, in St. Pancras churchyard. There it was, in that solemn and earnest place, in the presenceUNION WITH SHELLEY. 67 of all those ghostly dead, where all the idols and vani- ties of the world are laid low and only the truth re- mains, that Shelley poured out his soul to that woman : the story of his early life, his disappointments at school, his disagreements with his father, his unloved marriage, his aspirations, his hopes for the future, his love for her. And there it was, in that place the dearest and most familiar to her eyes, in that place where her restless heart had always come for sym- pathy and understanding, there under the guiding spirit of her mother, that Mary Godwin plighted her troth to Shelley. On July 28, 1814, one of the hottest days that had been known in England for many years, the lovers secretly left London for Dover, accompanied by Jane Clairmont. They reached Dover too late for that day’s packet, and after a cool bath in the sea, not wishing to wait another day, they resolved to make the sail across the channel in an open boat. As the sun was setting on that hot July day, this strange trio embarked on that strangest of wedding journeys. The sailors promised them a fair run of two hours, and as they put out a gentle wind played lightly with the bright hair of the two lovers. The stars came out and it grew darker, the breeze died down, red and ominous over the horizon the moon hung low, and they lay for some time becalmed. Presently the sea became troubled, clouds obscured68 UNION WITH SHELLEY. the face of the moon, a gust of wind struck the sail, drove the bow of the boat into the water, and the waves rushed over the side; they were in imminent peril of being swamped, but the sailors succeeded in reefing the sail and getting the craft before the wind. Immediately the storm overtook them, the sea ran high, and the little boat tossed from side to side, the sky was lit up by flashes of light and the rain de- scended. In this plight they remained for hours. Mary was sea-sick and slept most of the time, waking up now and then to ask how far they were, and to re- ceive always the same dismal answer, “ Not quite half way.” Finally, finding that they could make no progress toward Calais, it was determined to try for Boulogne; but the wind changed, the boat was put about, and just as the sun was climbing out of the sea, wet and glowing from its bath, they descried through the mist the sails that lay at anchor in the harbor of Calais. Thence the travellers made for Paris, where they spent a week of such extreme weather that they were lim- ited to a few journeys in the latter part of the after- noon, when the glare and the heat from the white pavements was more endurable. On discovering their departure from London, Mrs. Godwin had followed them to Calais, principally to dissuade her daughter from continuing the journey with them. She was, however, unsuccessful, and re-UNION WITH SHELLEY, 69 turned home. Shelley’s journal gives an account of the hasty entrance into their room of the landlord of the hotel, “to say that a fat lady had arrived, who said that I had run away with her daughter.” After their stay at Paris, they set out to walk through France. Never were the requirements of a wedding journey more simple. With a donkey to carry the luggage, and Mary when she became tired, —with a few pieces of silver in Shelley’s pocket,— this remnant of the romantic ages set out on its jour- ney. But alas! the sun shone hot on their fair English faces, their feet were blistered, and the donkey groaned under the weight of the simple trousseau ; the fair lady was obliged to walk, while her palfrey turned his long ears to catch the slightest breeze, or nibbled the sweet grass as he loitered by the way. One can imagine this strange trio as at sundown they entered some little, rude village. One can see the villagers, their arms akimbo, all agog with curios- ity, as the dusty travellers toiled up the long street to the inn, urging on the stupid little beast. Romantic enough must the trio have looked,—Shelley and Mary, with their fair hair blowing in the wind, their slight, willowy figures, their luminous, sparkling eyes,—of graver and more substantial build Jane Clairmont,—the poor, hopeless, sad-eyed little donkey, the only unhappy one of the group, complaining un- der his weight of clothing; eager and >bustling the70 UNION WITH SHELLEY. hostess at the inn, as she saw them cross her friendly threshold for the night. When they found that the little donkey was not sufficient for his burdens, Shelley parted with one of his silver pieces for a mule. Mounted on this beast, with the luggage behind her, Mary Godwin rode along the highway, Jane and Shelley trudging by her side. They travelled through the rudest little hamlets; some- times they slept in an inn, as often in a barn. Shelley sprained his ankle, and then it became his turn to mount the mule. Astonishing as was the appearance of the procession of the luggage-laden donkey, how much more this arrangement,—Shelley mounted on the beast and the two women walking humbly by his side. They soon sold the mule for a cart. Each time Shelley parted with one of his silver pieces. This time it was to hire a man with a mule, who agreed to carry them into Switzerland. So they jogged, the three of them, along with the luggage in this cart that Shelley had bought. Here too there was chagrin and disappointment, for one morning they awoke to find that the charioteer with his steed had gone on to a village in advance and left them their empty cart. Finally, however, near the 1st of September, they reached Switzerland, only to find that, by starting im- mediately, Shelley had just money enough to carry them back to England. With regret they left LucerneUNION WITH SHELLEY. 71 at once. On reaching the Rhine they, in company with some other travellers, hired a boat and journeyed down the famous river. In true Shelleyan fashion, they chose the side where the rapids were swiftest, and were many times in danger. By the 13th of September they reached England.CHAPTER IV. LIFE IN ENGLAND—MARRIAGE. This union with Shelley was the epoch in the life of Mary Godwin. It was an epoch also in Shelley’s life, beside which his ill-advised marriage was an epi- sode. To both of them it was the event from which all else dated. To Mary Godwin it was the beginning of life; to the poet an awakening to a new and more fervid existence. Upon the lives of two such beings, so rarely adapted to each other, it is scarcely possible to overestimate the beatific influences of a mutual passion so instant, so intense as this; of a love so spontaneous, so tender, so reasonable as theirs. It is not possible to treat of Mrs. Shelley’s life with- out giving due consideration to the step which she thus took in forming this union with Shelley. Various motives, chief of which is the difficulty of properly and wisely speaking, urge one to pass over it in silence, and after the approved custom of commentators to de- vote much time to the details of this strangest of wed- ding trips, and say nothing about the real union of the wedded pair: to spend pages upon the description of the child and woman, and to ignore that which made 72LIFE IN ENGLAND—MARRIAGE. 73 the child a woman, and became the formative force of all her active life. But if we are in earnest in our desire to present the character of Mrs. Shelley as it was, we must under- stand what were the motives and what the mental attitude which induced her to accept the love of Shel- ley, and enter into this memorable union with him,— she a maiden of sixteen, he a man already bound in the civil obligation of marriage to Harriet West- brook. So true is it that extremes meet, that almost any effect may be the result of causes diametrically oppo- site. Intense cold will burn like fire; the pulse quickens with joy and fear; Epicurus and the ascetics alike taught moderation. So the conduct of Mary Godwin, in thus disregarding the accepted conven- tions of civil law and society, may be attributed to motives the most opposite; to utter thoughtlessness, and to excess of thought,—to a blind self-gratification, and a nature broad in its altruistic humanity. To the small mind each event in life has but one possible aspect,—that, namely, which happens to be visible through the narrow chink which is presented to the outer world. To such, what need to speak? Other minds there are that both see and think. Be- tween these two types of mind there is ever total variance: the one, blind to its own limitations, cries out for the condemnation of all it cannot comprehend;74 LIFE IN ENGLAND—MARRIAGE. the other, the diviner mind, stooping, writes upon the sand until the outcry has echoed its own answer, then rising says, “ Woman, neither do I condemn you.” It is not for us either to approve or to con- demn Mary Godwin in this matter. Her union with Shelley, in its personal and ethical aspect, concerns us not. We need to consider this union in so far only as it is a true index of her character. For that Mary Godwin naturally and simply accepted Shelley with- out shock or jar to her moral nature is one of the facts of her life. The girl who at sixteen calmly and trust- ingly joins her life with a man already bound under the social obligations of marriage, indicates a past ethical history as far out of the common as it is possi- ble to imagine. It is in this retrospective aspect that this Shelley union chiefly interests us. Of all the influences of Mary Godwin’s pre-Shelleyan life the strongest were hereditary, and of these the most powerful came from her mother. Standing above all the women of her day, in the courage with which she had thrown off the limitations of authority in social and ethical matters, and in the force with which she contended for the right of individual judgment in each and every case, Mary Wollstonecraft became in her entire being, as she did in name, an expression of the paramount duty of personal judgment de novo in all those matters which society by its conventions thought it had settled. That upon the institution ofLIFE IN ENGLAND—MARRIAGE, 75 marriage she brought to bear the same emancipated reason, is as the essence of her history. In her fer- vent nature these ideas burned in her through life and became incorporated into the intellectual structure of her being. Such special notions, when they have taken possession of a parent life, are transmissible to offspring to a degree in excess of unacquired tenden- cies. Any faculty of mind or body, any special aptitude or function which by cultivation or encour- agement has been acquired or been absorbed into the life of the parent will have this tendency to reappear in the offspring. This is a rule of heredity not con- fined to mankind. The trained pointer transmits to its litter an acquired sense of smell, and in a genera- tion the whole of any stock can be changed by the transmission of acquired variations. Had Mary Wollstonecraft been wedded to the most commonplace and orthodox man in England (and who so orthodox), there would have been strong grounds for the expectation that her child would, in some de- gree, reproduce those special mental tendencies of her illustrious mother. But when Mary Wollstonecraft united her life with William Godwin, an intellectual horoscope was cast for the offspring of that union. Such a doubling of special tendencies could have but the result of assuring their reappearance in the chil- dren of such a union. Never were two people better agreed upon any point than were Mary Wollstonecraft76 LIFE IN ENGLAND—MARRIAGE. and William Godwin upon the supreme duty of not permitting established social customs to bias individual judgment. What she had believed and felt, he had long since reasoned out and taught; her individual unwillingness to have private judgment supplanted by a public system of ethics, in him found a philosopher who had long contended that all systems of public morality but enervated private morals; that the only way to produce good in the individual was to develop it in him by familiar principles governing the laws of growth. He had taught that nothing is eventually to be found in our lives but what had grown within us. The mind of Godwin had also been especially di- rected to the marriage relation, that experimentum crucis of all original thinkers. By his own road he had reached the same goal that Mary Wollstonecraft had by hers. He regarded the marriage tie as use- less, if not positively injurious to the best interest of society. In this respect Godwin was the more radical of the two, for while she desired that marriage should be freed from its galling bonds and its obligations out- lasting love and respect, he contended that it was wrong in principle, even when it did not gall; and that its true perpetuity should rest solely upon the continuance of mutual esteem. Indeed, regard for the social welfare of their offspring was the motive which induced these two people to so far abandon their high principles as to enter into the Holy Bonds:LIFE IN ENGLAND—MARRIAGE. 77 so strongly were they to each other’s knowledge committed to the sovereignty of individual over social judgment. So zealously had both in their own way “ railed at the bond.” When now a child is born to William Godwin and Mary Wollstonecraft, what would expectant science predicate of it, with greater certitude, than that the trammels of convention would trouble it but little, and that authority, to put it in subjection, would have to forge its bonds anew ? The event fulfilled the pre- diction, and in Mary Godwin reappeared, with the peculiar strength which marks the doubling of special parental traits, the distinguishing qualities of both parents: chief of which was the inborn tendency to exercise an untrammelled reason, unabashed by, nay, even unconscious of, the presence of convention. With these inherited influences Mary Godwin started in the morning of life; nor during its course was she ever placed in circumstances which would strongly tend to neutralize these views thus inherited. On the contrary, all that she could learn of her mother led her to cherish this independence as an essential attribute : all of her mother’s writings, as they came in her way, imprinted upon her plastic brain the same text. And as little by little the history and events of her mother’s life came to her, she could not but re- ceive it as a familiar principle, that to exercise one’s reason in all things was the holiest heritage of hu-73 LIFE IN ENGLAND—MARRIAGE. manity. Nor would it escape her mind that mar- riage was as proper a sphere as any other for the free exercise of human reason, thus liberated. While the vituperations freshly showered upon her mother's name, and almost upon her grave, would as power- fully as arguments cry out in her behalf, supplementing reason with sympathy. Similarly her father’s writings and his position in the world of letters, and among thinkers, gave the philosophy of that spirit of rationality which she had received as her birth-right and assimilated with her growth. His teachings and history, the atmosphere of much of his association, would not materially modify these potent influences. To Mary Godwin, thus mothered, thus fathered, thus nurtured, comes Shelley, himself an earnest, fer- vid believer in the essential truths of the self-same faith. Once met, each in the other recognizes all his needs, all that the fullest sense of fitness or the high- est ideal of beauty could demand. She knows his pure, elevated nature, knew of his ill-assorted mar- riage, to which companionship had ever been wanting and from which even toleration had about fled. To her, looking at it with eye of reason, this marriage was simply a grievous error; it had been worked out to a demonstration before she came upon the scene. She could do Harriet Westbrook no harm. She couldLIFE IN ENGLAND—MARRIAGE. 79 bring to Shelley infinite blessing. She knew that he loved her, and that she alone could make him happy. She felt her ability to share his labors, to accompany even his spirit into its flights, to alternately stimulate and sustain him; now to hold up his arms while the bat- tle raged, and now rest him, when, with spirit returned to earth, he longed for no companionship but hers. Sympathy and judgment combined to press his suit. Thus the stars in their courses warred for Shelley. In his behalf reason argued and love pleaded, an alliance all but invincible. Did she want a principle of action, she had inherited it; did she need precept, she had her father’s writings; if precedent were lack- ing, her mother’s life, the only one of influence to her, supplied it. As a present incentive to the decision, she had the eager, pleading Shelley, already her bosom’s lord, whom she knew to be noble, generous, pure, and elevated, and whose fate and future were in her hands. The decision must be made, and she must make it. On the one hand, Love, Reason, Happiness, and a life with Shelley; on the other, a social custom, a name, to her a mere form, whose bones were marrow- less,—a convention for which she had inherited dis- like and acquired distrust. Is it a thing to be marvelled at that on that day in July Mary Godwin unhesitatingly placed her hand in Shelley’s and linked her fate with his ?So LIFE IN ENGLAND—MARRIAGE. Godwin’s irritation and annoyance at the flight of Shelley and his daughter were extreme, and for many months there was no intercourse between the two families. His views on the subject of marriage had not only become modified since the death of Mary Wollstonecraft, they were completely changed. He knew that the world would have the erroneous idea that his daughter’s act had been in conformity with her education, and the mistake of such a belief made the sting none the less severe to his vain, sensitive nature. It was now that Shelley’s poetic genius began to ripen and take form. He found in Mary Godwin an ardent appreciator of his work, a sharer and encour- ager of his noblest aspirations, a wise and gifted com- panion, a loving friend. Now his brain began to con- ceive those imperishable poems. There might without be ignominy and reproach for him, but at his fireside the wrangles of the world were never heard; those luminous eyes shed ever their gentle light upon him. Mary and he worked, studied, or played together; whatever the one did that also the other shared. They read prodigiously, always the same book,—never two ; walking, boating, in the house, they had a book by them, either philosophy or poetry, logic or novel. During the autumn of their return to England their means were most limited. Shelley was often so harassed by debts of his ov^n and of Harriet’s con-LIFE IN ENGLAND—MARRIAGE. 81 traction that there were days together when he did not dare stay at home, but passed the. time at the house of a friend, and Mary, when she wished to be with him, was obliged to go there and visit him. They lived in lodgings in London, and were almost alone in their solitude, for few of Shelley’s friends came to visit him at this time. But the criticism of the outer world weighed little upon them. Mary gave but slight promise of the mental brilliancy that afterwards developed. She was still but a child, miniature in appearance, in thought, and expression, apt to be petulant when displeased, and it was only after her companionship with Shelley had awakened her latent powers that she began to show the grace and charm of conversation that so distinguished her after-years. But Shelley had felt the heart and ten- derness concealed in this tightly-closed little bud, and knew that in the right sort of atmosphere it would blossom into a beautiful soul. She was singularly pale, and rather careless in her dress. But as she grew older and lovely in form, contact with the world taught her to make her raiment adorn her, simple even as it always was. In the beginning of the year 1815, his grandfather dying, Shelley’s father allowed him ^1000 a year, as being the direct heir to the estate. A portion of this Shelley immediately reserved for Harriet, who was still with her father. Her relations to him were friendly in 682 LIFE IN ENGLAND—MARRIAGE. the extreme, and he acted as her adviser and confidant for some time. There never was any outward appear- ance of discord between Mary or Harriet, nor does it appear that the latter ever evinced serious objection to Shelley’s conduct; it is also stated that Harriet knew from Shelley of his intended elopement with Mary, and that the haste of their departure from England was lest the Godwins should prevent, not Harriet. Shelley was even anxious that Mary’s and* his home should be considered as Harriet’s, but his lawyers convinced him of the inadvisability of this plan. In the spring of that year he and Mary lived at Bishop- gateheath, near Windsor Forest, and Shelley, whom the doctors pronounced dying of consumption, spent much of the summer in the open air, he and Mary taking long excursions on the river. Miss Clair- mont, who now found herself welcomed only as an occasional visitor in Skinner Street, spent most of her time with the Shelleys; and during the summer the poet, his friend Peacock, and Charles Clairmont, who also lived with them, journeyed in a wherry to the source of the Thames. Mary and the poet still kept up their reading—French, Greek, Latin, and Italian works. He wrote a few scattered poems, and at the end of the year produced “Alastor.” A nation at peace has no history, and there is little to tell of this first year, except that Shelley’s spirits rose, that his health—which had long been fitful—LIFE IN ENGLAND—MARRIAGE. 83 began to improve, and that under his broadening in- fluence Mary Godwin’s mind was maturing and de- veloping. On the 24th of January, 1816, their second child was born, the son William, who afterwards died in Rome. Their first child, a daughter, had lived only a few days. The spring months were spent at Binfield, and in March, Godwin, who went on a visit to Bracknell, walked over from there to see his daughter. This call renewed the intercourse between the two families, and afterwards visits and letters followed. In April the Shelleys, accompanied by Miss Clair- mont, who attached herself to their fortunes, started for Geneva, where Byron was also to be established. On the 27th of May the poets first met, and they spent two weeks together in the Hotel de Secheron, after which Byron took the Villa Diodati, on the borders of the lake, and Shelley occupied the Villa Mont Alegre just below, separated only from the lake by a small garden overgrown with trees. It had no carriage access, and a pathway through the gardens of the Diodati joined his villa to Lord Byron’s. Here Shelley and Byron bought a boat and spent long days on the water, or wandered inland together. Mary, with her unerring insight, saw that Byuon’s influence over Shelley was untoward; it made him discontented and inactive, while, on the contrary, in Shelley’s pres-84 LIFE IN ENGLAND—MARRIAGE. ence, Byron absorbed his elevated and earnest tone, and the latter’s poetry of that period is wider in its sympathy, less intensely Byronic. In the last of May, Mrs. Shelley writes of Geneva,— “ We have not yet found out any very agreeable walks, but you know our attachment for water excur- sions. We have hired a boat, and every evening at about six o’clock we sail on the lake, which is de- lightful, whether we glide over a glassy surface or are speeded along by a strong wind. The waves of this lake never afflict me with that sickness that deprives me of all enjoyment in a sea-voyage ; on the contrary, the tossing of the boat inspires me with unusual hilarity. Twilight here is of short duration, but we at present enjoy the benefit of an increasing moon, and seldom return until ten o’clock, when, as we approach the shore, we are saluted by the delightful scent of flowers and new-mown grass, and the chirp of the grasshoppers, and the song of the evening birds. “ We do not enter into society here, yet our time passes swiftly and delightfully. We read Latin and Italian during the heats of noon, and when the sun declines we walk in the garden of the hotel, look- ing at the rabbits, relieving fallen cockchafers, and watching the motions of a myriad of lizards who in- habit a southern wall of the garden. You know that we have just escaped from the gloom of winter and of London, and coming to this delightful spot duringLIFE IN ENGLAND—MARK /AGE. 85 this divine weather, I feel as happy as a new-fledged bird, and hardly care what twig I fly to, so that I may try my new-found wings. A more experienced bird may be more difficult in its choice of a bower; but in my present temper of mind, the budding flowers, the fresh grass of spring, and the happy creatures about me that live and enjoy these pleasures, are quite enough to afford me exquisite delight, even though clouds should shut out Mont Blanc from my sight. Adieu.” The famous “ Monk” Lewis, renowned for his ghost stories, also joined them here. Kept in-doors much of the time by an unusually rainy season, this brilliant company entertained themselves by telling goblin tales. One imagines them seated around a table dimly lighted by the flickering, sputtering candles, listening to the weird tales of Lewis,—the gibbering, superstitious, half-insane Italian physician Polidori, whom Byron kept as body-guard to earthly ills, sitting in a chair drawn to some obscure corner of the room, far distant from the ghostly circle of conjurors. One can hear the swash of the waves not far off on the shores of the lake,—can hear the wind beat the leaves and vines against the latticed panes of the window, can see the candles one by one as they sputter and go out, see the eager eye, the quick breathing, the parted lips of Mary Godwin, the satirical smile of Lord Byron, the amused interest of Shelley, the cowed aspect of86 LIFE IN ENGLAND—MARRIAGE. the pompous little doctor away in the farthest end of the room. The breathless attention of the others and the wrapt horror of the superstitious Italian but gives inspira- tion to the ghoulish Lewis, till at the end of the tale a peal of laughter relieves the strain, and the lights are restored and the wind ceases its beatings and the lake its frettings, and the little, disturbed, fussy doctor can draw his chair into the genial light and receive the comfort of his flesh-and-blood friends. Impelled by their weird impressions, each of them agreed to write a goblin tale. Mary Godwin’s “ Frank- enstein” and Polidori’s “ Vampire Bat” are the only ones that saw print, or indeed were ever finished. It was while Shelley and Byron were off on a short excursion that Mary Godwin wrote this masterpiece of imagination. She was then only eighteen. Shel- ley was greatly gratified on his return to receive this proof of her literary ability, especially as it confirmed the belief that he entertained in her creative faculty. He first awakened this mind, and to him belongs the honor of first recognizing its possibilities. Jane Clairmont and Lord Byron were much together at this time. Byron had met her in London some time before, when he was connected with the Drury Lane Theatre. She had gone to him to ask for some stage position, and it is probable that her handsome face had duly impressed his lordship. Although theLIFE IN ENGLAND—MARRIAGE. 87 Shelleys did not know the intimacy of the friendship, and were troubled and annoyed on discovering it, when, after their return to England, the little Allegra was born, they bestowed every care they could on mother and child. While they were still in Geneva, Shelley wrote to his friend, Thomas Love Peacock, to get him a house somewhere, whatever would be suitable, and lease it for fourteen or twenty-one years. Could anything be more purely Shelleyan ? Peacock was to select his future home, move his furniture from Bishopgate, sell what he thought superfluous,—curtains, draperies, etc., —make all the final arrangements. There was one con- dition only, that the house should be prettily situated, if possible, but Peacock was to make the tremendous decision. Either from wisdom or inability, he did not do it, but he aided his friend in the hunt after his return. September found the Shelleys in England, and while the poet was looking for a house Mary sent him this charming little note to aid his search: “ In the choice of a residence, dear Shelley, pray do not be too quick, or attach yourself too much to one spot. A house with a lawn, near a river or lake, noble trees, or divine mountains,—that should be our little mouse-hole to retire to. But never mind this. Give me a garden, and I will thank my love for many favors. If you go to London you will perhaps try to88 life IN ENGLAND—MARRIAGE. procure me a good Livy, for I wish very much to read it. I must be more industrious, especially in learning Latin, which I neglected shamefully last summer at intervals; and those periods of not reading at all put me back very far. Adieu. Love me tenderly, and think of me with affection whenever anything pleases you greatly.” A house was found at Great Marlow, a long, stuc- coed building, pleasant and spacious, with a garden and summer-house attached, and meadows and woods just beyond. While the house was being prepared for them they stayed at Bath. It was here that they learned of the disaster of Fanny Imlay’s death. The report, which was due to Jane Clairmont, that she destroyed herself on account of her love for Shel- ley, has no truth in it. There is no explanation what- ever of her strange death, nor did there appear to be any outward cause for it. Her life at home was not unhappy; it had none of the elements of discord in it that Mary Godwin’s had had. Her gentle and lovable disposition made it easy for her to bear with Mrs. Godwin, and she was growing to be a trusted com- panion of her father. She was accustomed to write cheerful letters to Mary and the poet of all that inter- ested her, often making light of the little household jarrings. In one of her letters she says that she “ got on very well with mamma, whose merits she could see, though she could not really like her.” She was, how-LIFE IN ENGLAND—MARRIAGE. 89 ever, marked by that tinge of melancholy which was inborn in the Wollstonecraft temperament, which even Mary Godwin inherited. Shortly after their establishment at Marlow, just one month to a day after the death of Fanny Imlay, the dreadful intelligence reached Shelley that his wife, Harriet Westbrook, had drowned herself in the Ser- pentine. All the world acknowledges now that her distressing death was not attributable to Shelley, but to misfortunes over which he had no immediate con- trol. Shelley’s grief and horror at the catastrophe were sincere and poignant. With rare love and ap- preciation Mary Godwin recognized the effort which Shelley made to conceal from others his regrets and his pain, for Shelley always held himself* responsible, not for Harriet’s death, but for her social uprooting, her introduction into a circle of thought which she could not understand. He justly felt that although she it was who had taken the initiative in their fatal marriage, had his life never interrupted, or crossed hers, she would have passed tranquilly to old age, moved only by the joys and sorrows of a common- place existence, agitated only by its questions. At the end of this year, December 30, 1816, Shelley and Mary Godwin were married in St. Mildred’s Church, Bread Street, only Mr. and Mrs. Godwin being present. And here follows a letter from Godwin to his brother, a simple countryman,9o LIFE IN ENGLAND—MARRIA GE. which makes the immortal Godwin responsible for statements which sound very like equivocations: “ Feb. 21,1817. “ Dear Brother,—I have not written to you for a great while, but now I have a piece of news to tell you that will give you pleasure. I will not refuse myself the satisfaction of being the vehicle of that pleasure. I do not know whether you recollect the miscellaneous way in which my family is com- posed, but at least you perhaps remember that I have but two children of my own: a daughter of my late wife, and a son by my present. Were it not that you have a family of your own, and can see by them how little shrubs grow up into tall trees, you would hardly imagine that my boy, born the other day, is now fourteen, and that my daughter is between nineteen and twenty. The piece of news I have to tell you, however, is that I went to church with this tall girl, some little time ago, to be married. Her husband is the eldest son of Sir Timothy Shelley, of Field Place, in the County of Sussex, Baronet, so that, according to the vulgar ideas of the world, she is well married, and I have great hopes the young man will make her a good husband. You will wonder, I dare say, how a girl without a penny of fortune should meet with so good a match. But such are the ups and downs of this world. For my part, I care butLIFE IN ENGLAND—MARRIAGE. 9T little, comparatively, about wealth, so that it should be her destiny in life to be respectable, virtuous, and contented.” The winter after the marriage was spent at Mar- low, where Shelley kept open house, living with the lavish hospitality of a country gentleman. The house contained many rooms, which were always filled with friends. Peacock, who had been one of the inducements for settling in Marlow, lived near him, and Hunt, Horace Smith, and his brother were frequent visitors. Shelley’s generosity knew no limits, and although his personal wants were very few, he probably lived above his income. His household was always large,—three or four servants, beside the Swiss nurse for William. In February, 1817, the little Allegra, the daughter of Lord Byron and Jane Clairmont, was born. The whole care of this child was willingly assumed by Mrs. Shelley until the time of their departure to Italy in 1818, when it was sent, at Byron’s request, to him in Venice. Mrs. Shelley parted regretfully with the child, to whom she was tenderly attached; but no one knew better than she that Byron’s protection was to be preferred to that of its mother. Much of the time at Marlow, as also in Italy, Jane Clairmont made her home with the Shelleys, but she was neither an agree- able member of the family nor a desired companion.LIFE IN ENGLAND—MARRIAGE. 92 Now, as afterward in Italy, her connection with the Shelleys gave rise to malicious rumors, and by the concealed paternity of her child, which she exacted from them and which they generously helped her to maintain, the gravest imputations were laid at Shelley’s feet. The most cordial intercourse existed between the Hunts and themselves; it grew into an abiding friend- ship,—a friendship, alas ! fatal to Shelley. Shelley had sought Hunt’s acquaintance when the latter was con- fined in Surrey Gaol, and since his liberation and his residence in Lisson Grove, North, the communication between the two families had daily increased. Visits and badinage were equally exchanged. This little letter to Hunt is especially interesting in the earnest it gives of that brilliancy which Mrs. Shelley after- wards attained in letter writing. It is dated 5th March, 1817. Marlow, 1 o’clock. “ My dear Hunt,—Although you mistook me in thinking that I wished you to write about politics in your letters to me,—as such a thought was, in fact, far from me,—yet I cannot help mentioning your last week’s Examiner, as its boldness gave me extreme pleasure. I am very glad to find that you wrote the leading article, which I had doubted, as there was no significant hand. But though I speak of this, do not fear that you will be teased by me on these subjectsLIFE IN ENGLAND—MARRIAGE. 93 when we enjoy your company at Marlow. When there, you shall never be serious when you wish to be merry, and have as many nuts to crack as there are words in the petitions to Parliament for reform,—a tremendous promise. “ Have you never felt in your succession of nervous feelings one single disagreeable truism gain a painful possession of your mind and keep it for some months ? A year ago, I remember, my private hours were all made better by reflections on the certainty of death; and now the flight of time has the same power over me. Everything passes and one is hardly conscious of enjoying the present before it becomes the past. I was reading the other day the letters of Gibbon. He entreats Lord Sheffield to come with all his family to visit him at Lausanne, and dwells on the pleasure that such a visit will occasion. There is a little gap in the date of his letters, and then he complains that his solitude is made more irksome by their having been there and departed. So will it be with us in a few months when you will all have left Marlow. But I will not indulge this gloomy feeling. The sun shines brightly, and we shall be very happy in our garden this summer. “ Affectionately yours, “ Marina.” During the summer Shelley and Mary made many94 LIFE IN ENGLAND—MARRIAGE. little trips by water, either accompanied by friends or alone. Godwin and his wife were sometimes of the party, and in Godwin’s diary is a note that on one occasion their talk was of “ novels and perfectibility.” Their reading was extensive: Greek, Latin, French, Italian. Shelley was writing the “ Revolt of Islam,” which he published at the end of the year, under the title of “ Laon and Cythna.” In the exquisite verses of dedication to this poem Shelley has paid to Mary the tenderest, the highest tribute that a man could pay to the woman he loved. On September 3d, Mrs. Shelley’s third child, Clara, was born. The physician lived some fifteen miles away, and his son remembers how Shelley used to appear all out of breath, sometimes riding, as often walking, never stopping to take more than a bowl of milk before he darted off again in his rapid fashion. After Harriet’s death, Shelley demanded the care of the children whom he had by her; but Harriet’s father, Mr. Westbrook, denied his right on the ground of his radical and unsafe principles, and placed the matter in the hands of the law. Eldon, the Lord Chancellor, had decided against Shelley, and the children were given to the care of a clergyman, and £200 a year deducted from Shelley’s income to maintain them. He was utterly overwhelmed by this blow, but neither his outraged feelings nor the rigor of the decree swayed the chancellor. Shelley’s indignation foundLIFE IN ENGLAND—MARRIAGE. 95 slight expression in the dignified but scathing attack on Lord Eldon in the “ Mask of Anarchy.” In the spring of 1818 the Shelleys decided to go to Italy. Various reasons are assigned for this step,— the delicacy of the poet’s health, impaired by his con- stant visits to the poor, which Marlow had in great numbers, and the desire to convey the little Allegra to Byron. Mrs. Shelley says that it was from fear that a threat, uttered by the Lord Chancellor, to de- prive Shelley of their two children, would be carried out. In March they started for Italy, going direct to Milan. Shelley left England sick at heart, smarting from the recriminations and persecutions which ever dogged his heels,—torn with anguish at the loss of his children, tortured by physical pains. But close by his side, sharing in all his grief, Mary Shelley kept equal step with him in this leave-taking. And a true leave-taking it was, for Shelley never saw English land again. Six years after, with trembling steps, Mary returned alone; husband and children slept under Italian skies.CHAPTER V. ITALY. The Shelleys stayed a month at Milan and thence went to the Lake of Como and Leghorn. They met at Leghorn Mrs. Gisborne, the Mrs. Revely of former days. She was still the same woman of charming temperament, of cultivation, and wide sympathy. Though she had not seen Mary since her infancy, she had retained for her interest and affection. She was with them occasionally during their life in Italy, and a beautiful friendship existed between them. From Leghorn the Shelleys went to the baths of Lucca, where they spent the summer. These letters to Mrs. Gisborne give an interesting picture of their life there: “June 15, 1818. “ Casa Bertini, Bagni di Lucca. “ My dear Madam,—It is strange, after having been in the habit of visiting you daily, to have no communication with you, and after having been accus- tomed for a month to the tumult of the Via Grande, to come to this quiet scene, where we have no sound except the rushing of the river in the valley below. 96ITALY. 97 While at Leghorn I hardly heard the noise, but when I came here I felt the silence as a return to something very delightful from which I had been long absent. We live here in the midst of a beautiful scene, and I wish that I had the imagination and expression of a poet to describe it as it deserves, and to fill you all with an ardent desire to visit it. We are surrounded by mountains covered with thick chestnut woods. They are peaked and picturesque, and sometimes you see peeping above them the bare summit of a distant Apennine. Vines are cultivated at the foot of the mountains. The walks in the woods are delightful, for I like nothing so much as to be surrounded by the foliage of trees, only peeping now and then through the leafy screen on the scene about me. You can either walk by the side of the river or on com- modious paths cut in the mountains, and for rambles the woods are intersected with narrow paths in every direction. “ Our house is small, but commodious and exceed- ingly clean, for it has just been painted and the furni- ture is new. We have a small garden, and at the end of it an arbor of laurel trees so thick that the sun does not penetrate it. Nor has my prediction followed us, that we should everywhere find it cool. Although not hot, the weather has been very pleasant. We see the fire-flies in an evening somewhat dimmed by the bright rays of the moon. 798 ITALY. “And now I will say a few words of our domestic economy, albeit I am afraid the subject has tired you out of your wits more than once. Signor Chiappo we found perfectly useless. He would talk of nothing but himself, and recommended a person to cook our dinner for us at three pauls a day. So as it is, Paolo (whom we find exceedingly useful) cooks and man- ages for us, and a woman comes at one paul a day to do the dirty work. We live very comfortably, and if Paolo did not cheat us he would be a servant worth a treasure, for he does everything cleanlily and exactly, without teasing us in any way. So we lead here a very quiet, pleasant life, reading our canto of Ariosto and walking in the evening among these delightful woods. We have but one wish (you know what that is), but you take no pity upon us, and exile us from your presence so long that I quite long to see you again. Now we see no one. The Signor Chiappo is a stupid fellow, and the Casino is not open that I know of,—at least it is not at all frequented. When it is, every kind of amusement goes on there, particularly dancing, which is divided into four parts,—English and French country dances, quadrilles, waltzes, and Italian dances. These take place twice a week, on which evening the ladies dress, but on others they go merely in a walking dress. “ We have found among our books a volume of poems of Lord Byron’s, which you may not haveITALY. 99 seen. Some of them I think you will like; but this will be a novelty to recommend us on our return. I begin to be very much delighted with Ariosto. The beginning of the nineteenth canto is particularly beau- tiful. It is the wounding of Medoro and his being relieved by Angelica, who, for a wonder, shows her- self in light of a sympathizing and amiable person. “Affectionately yours, “ Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley.” Shelley himself, in a letter, makes a humorous allusion to the dancing. “ They have a ball at the Casino here every Saturday,” he writes, “ which we attend; but neither Mary nor C-----dance. I do not know whether they refrain from philosophy or Prot- estantism.” The C-----mentioned in the following letter is Jane, or, as she preferred to be called, Claire Clairmont. “ Bagni di Lucca, August 17, 1818. “ My dear Madam,—It gave me great pleasure to receive your letter, after so long a silence, when I had begun to conjecture a thousand reasons for it, and among others illness, in which I was half right. In- deed I am much concerned to hear of Mr. Revely’s attacks, and sincerely hope that nothing will retard his speedy recovery. His illness gave me a slight hope that you will now be induced to come to the100 ITALY. baths, if it were even to try the effects of the hot baths. You would find the weather cool, for we al- ready feel in this part of the world that the year is declining by the cold mornings and evenings. I have Another selfish reason to wish that you would come, which I have a great mind not to mention. Yet I will not omit it, as it might induce you. Shelley and C-----are gone: they went to-day to Venice on impor- tant business; and I am left to take charge of the house. Now if all of you, or any of you, would come and cheer my solitude it would be exceedingly kind. I dare say you would find many of your friends here. Among the rest there is the Signora Felicho, whom I believe you knew at Pisa. u Shelley and I have ridden almost every evening: C-----did the same at first; but she has been unlucky, and once fell from her horse and hurt her knee, so as to knock her up for some time. It is the fashion here for all the English to ride; and it is very pleasant on these fine evenings, when we set out at sunset and are lighted home by Venus, Jupiter, and Diana, who kindly give us their light after the sleepy Apollo is gone to bed. The road which we frequent is raised somewhat above and overlooks the river, affording some very fine points of view among these woody mountains. “ Still, we know no one: we speak to one or two people at the Casino, and that is all. We live in ourITAL Y. IOI studious way, going on with Tasso, whom I like; but now I have read more than half his poems, I do not know that I like so well as Ariosto. Shelley trans- lated the ‘ Symposium’ in ten days. It is a most beau- tiful piece of writing. I think you will be delighted with it. It is true that in many particulars it shocks our present manners; but no one can be a reader of the works of antiquity unless they can transport themselves from these to other times, and judge not by our, but by their morality. “ Shelley is tolerably well in health; the hot weather has done him good. We have been in high debate, nor have we come to any conclusion concerning the land or sea journey to Naples. We have been think- ing that when we want to go, that although the equinox will be past, yet the equinoctial winds will hardly have spent themselves; but I cannot express to you how I fear a storm at sea, with two such young children as William and Clara. Do you know the periods when the Mediterranean is troubled, and when the wintry halcyon days come ? However it may be, we shall see you before we proceed south- ward. “We have been reading Eustace’s ‘Tour through Italy.’ I do not wonder the Italians reprinted it. Among other select specimens of his way of thinking, he says that the Romans did not derive their arts and learning from the Greeks; that Italian ladies are chaste,102 ITALY. and the lazzaroni honest and industrious; and that as to assassinations and highway robbery in Italy, it is all a calumny,—no such things were ever heard of. Italy was the Garden of Eden and all the Italians Adams and Eves, until the blasts of hell (