Production Note Cornell University Library pro- duced this volume to replace the irreparably deteriorated original. It was scanned using Xerox soft- ware and equipment at 600 dots per inch resolution and com- pressed prior to storage using CCITT Group 4 compression. The digital data were used to create Cornell's replacement volume on paper that meets the ANSI Stand- ard Z39.48-1984. The production of this volume was supported in part by the Commission on Prés- ervation and Access and the Xerox Corporation. Digital file copy- right by Cornell University Library 1991.djornell Urntteratty üihtary •îthara, Km flnrk THE ALEXANDER GRAY MEMORIAL LIBRARY ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING THE GIFT OFMAXWELL’S THEORY AND WIRELESS TELEGRAPHY PART ONE MAXWELL’S THEORY AND HERTZIAN OSCILLATIONS By H. POINCARÉ TRANSLATED By FREDERICK K. VREELAND * PART TWO THE PRINCIPLES OF WIRELESS TELEGRAPHY By FREDERICK K. VREELAND NEW YORK: McGRAW PÜBI^ISHING COMPANY, 114 Liberty Street. 1904. TUCopyright, 1904, BY THE McGRAW PUBLISHING COMPANY, New York.CONTENTS. PART ONE. MAXWELL'S THEORY AND HERTZIAN OSCILLATIONS, CHAPTER I. Generalizations Regarding Electrical Phenomena SEC. PAGE. 1. Attempts at Mechanical Explanation ..... 1 2. Electrostatic Phenomena ....... 3 3. Résistance of Conductors ....... G 4. Induction .......... 7 5. Electrodynamic Attraction ....... 9 CHAPTER II. Maxwell's Theory. 1. Relations Between Light and Electrieity . . . .13 2. Displacement Currents ....... 14 3. The Nature of Light ........ 19 CHAPTER III. Electrical Oscillations Before Hertz. 1. Experiments of Feddersen ....... 22 2. Lord Kelvin’s Theory ........ 23 3. Other Analogies ......... 26 4. Damping .......... 27 CHAPTER IV. Hertz’s Oscillator. 1. Hertz’s Discoverv . . . . . .31 2. Principle of the Oscillator ...... 32 [iii]iv CONTENTS. SEC. PAGE. 3. Different Forms of Oscillators . . . . .33 4. Function of the Spark ........ 35 5. Influence of Light ........ 36 6. The Use of Oil.............................................37 7. Value of the Wave-length ....... 37 CHAPTER V. Methods of Observation. 1. Principle of the Resonator . . . ... 38 2. Operation of the Resonator ....... 39 3. Other Methods of Using the Spark . . . . .42 4. Thermal Methods ........ 43 5. Mechanical Methods ........ 44 6. Comparison of the Different Methods . . . . .45 7. Coherers ...................................45 CHAPTER VI. Propagation Along a Wire. 1. Production of Waves in a Wire . . . . . .48 2. Mode of Propagation ........ 49 3. Velocity of Propagation and Diffusion . . . .50 4. Experiments of MM. Fizcau and Gounelle . . . .52 5. Diffusion of Currents . . • • .54 6. Experiments of M. Blondlot ....... 55 CHAPTER VII. Measurement of Wave-length and Multiple Résonance 1. Stationary Waves ........ 59 2. Multiple Résonance . . . . • • • .61 3. Another Explanation ........ 62 4. Experiments of Garbasso and Zehnder . . . .65 5. Measurement of the Décrément . . . . .66 6. Experiments of Strindberg ....... 68 7. Experiments of Pérot and Jones . . . . . • 69 8. Experiments of Décombe ....... 69 CHAPTER VIII. Propagation 7in Air. 1. The Experimentum Crucis . . . . . . .71 2. Experiments at Karlsruhe . . * . . • • .73CONTENTS. y SEC. PAGE. 3. Expérimenta at Geneva . . . , . . . 74. 4. Use of the Small Oscillator . . . . . . *. 74 5. Nature of the Radiations . . . . . . . 76 CHAPTER IX. Propagation in Dielectbics. 1. Maxwell’s Relation ........ 79 2. Dynamic Methods ....... 80 3. Static Methods ......... 80 4. Results .......... si 5. Conducting Bodies . . . . . . . . 82 6. Electrolytes .......... 83 CHAPTER X. Production of Very Rapid Oscillations. 1. Very Short Waves ....... 85 2. Righi’s Oscillator . . . . . . .85 3. Resonators ......... 87 4. Bose’s Oscillator ......... 88 5. Bose’s Detector ......... 89 CHAPTER XI. Imitation of Optical Phenomena. 1. Conditions of Imitation . . . . . .91 2. Interférence . . ■ . . . . . .92 3. Thin Films .......... 94 4. Secondary Waves ........ 94 5. Diffraction ......... 96 6. Polarization ....... 97 7. Polarization by Reflection ....... 98 8. Refraction .......... 98 9. Total Reflection ......... 99 10. Double Refraction . . . . . . . , 100 CHAPTER XII. Synthesis of Light. 1. Synthesis of Light . . . . . . . .101 2. Other Différences ........ 102 3. Explanation of Secondary Waves . . . . . . 103 4. Miscellaneous Remarks ....... 106VI CONTENTS. PART nvo. THE PRINCIPLES O F IVIRELESS TELEGRAPHY. CHAPTER I. General Principles. . page. 1. Methods of Signaling ïhrough Space . . . . .111 2. Method of Electromagnetic Induction . . . . .113 3. Preece’s Apparatus . . . . . . . .115 4. Method of Electrostatic Induction . . . . .117 5. Dolbear’s and Edison’s Apparatus . . . . iigr 6. Method of Electromagnetic Waves . . . . .121 7. Comparison of the Three Methods.............................12G CHAPTER IL Telegraphy by Hertzian Waves. 1. Early Experiments ..... 2. Marconi’s Early Apparatus .... 3. Improved Apparatus ..... 4. The Antenna . . . CHAPTER III. The Grounded Oscillator. 1. Development of Antenna . 2. Other Means of Increasing the Radiation "3. The Induction Coil . 4. High-Power Generators . CHAPTER IV. Propagation of Grounded Waves. 1. Three Hypothèses Suggested 2. The Free-Wave Hypothesis .... 3. The Alternating-Current Hypothesis . 130 . 132 . 135 . 133 . 141 . 140 . 140 . 151 . 150 . 157 . 159CONTENTS. vii SEC. PAGE. 4. Propagation Free Waves ....... 163 5. Propagation of Guided Waves . . . . . .172 6. Effect of Daylight on Wave Transmission . . .176 CHAPTER V. The Receiving Apparatus. 1. Detectors Classified . . . . . . . .179 2. Microphonie Detectors . . . . . . .179 3. Mechanical Detectors ........ 185 4. Thermal Detectors . . . . . . .186 5. Electrolytic Detectors ........ 187 6. Magnetic Detectors . . . . . .191 7. Arrangement of Receiving Apparatus . . . . .194 8. Current Multiplying Devices ...... 199 CHAPTER VI. SELECTIVE SiGNALING. 1. The Problem . . . . . . . . 202 2. Directed Signais ......... 203 3. Syntonie Signaling ........ 204 4. Lodge’s Syntonie Cônes and Leyden Jars .... 208 5. Marconi’s Concentric Cylinders . . . . .211 6. The Closed Oscillating Circuit . . . . .212 7. Inductively Interlinked Circuits . . . . .215 8. Tuned Receiving Apparatus ....... 223 9. Marconi’s Coherer System . . . . . . . 226 10. Slaby-Arco System ........ 228 11. Braun s System ......... 234 12. Lodge-Muirhead System . . . . . . 235 13. Limitations of Syntonie Signaling ..... 237 14. Other Means of Securing Selectivity ..... 242 15. Conclusion .......... 245PREFACE. The object of this book is to give a physical treatment of Maxwell’s theory and its applications to some modem elec- trical problems,— to set forth the fundamental principles which nnderlie ail electrical phenomena, according to Max- well and his followers, to show how these principles explain the ordinary facts of electricity and optics, and to dérivé from them a practical nnderstanding of the essentials of wireless telegraphy. Mathematics and abstruse reasoning are avoided, for the purpose is not to establish or defend a theory; but ratherto give the reader a clear mental picture of what takes place when, for example, a condenser is charged or a signal is sent around the earth — not to fight over old battles, but to pick out the fundamentals that hâve stood the test and are now generally accepted, and put them in such form that the busy man may use them or the student may take them as stepping-stones to the more advanced theory. Maxwell’s theory without mathematics may seem at first an incongruity, for has not Hertz himself said that Max- well’s theory is best defined as MaxwelPs System of équa- tions ?* Maxwell indeed used many hypothèses and physical assumptions in building up his theory, but later, when the mathematical structure was complété, he cast aside the scaffolding on which it was built, leaving a broad and com- préhensive System, unencumbered by needless details. His * Electric Waves, Eng. Trans. p. 21. [ix]PREFACE. x. équations are thus general rather than spécifie ; they express ail that is necessary and permanent in his theory, while ignoring that which is hypothetical and spéculative. A purely physical theory is likely to be imperfect by reason of its very definiteness ; s to be incomplète because it is too spécifie. Yet a mathematical theory without a physi- cal interprétation loses much of its value. Maxwell’s équa- tions are not an end in themselves — they are rather the means of expressing physical truths. The équation rep- resents the fact, but unless we recognize and grasp the fact the analysis becomes mere mathematical jugglery: and this is perhaps one reason why Maxwell’s great generalizations — the very “ Principia ” of modem electrical science — hâve not received more general attention. They are difficult to approach in the abstract, but so are the commonest elec- trical phenomena. It is not easy to conceive, in its essence, of an electrical current following a wire; we therefore pic- ture it to ourselves as something that flows like a material fluid in a pipe, and we find that it obeys similar lawrs. When we corne to the more complex phenomena of induction and magnetism the need of a physical concept is even greater, and we turn for assistance to the traditional Unes or tubes of force and induction. These physical conventions lack the précision and elegance of a mathematical expression, but they are more easily grasped and handled : if we realize their limitations and take pains to discriminate between that which is absolute fact and that which is onlv figurative, they become most useful implements of research, and we may take them, as Faraday did his “ tubes of force,” as the équivalents of the mathematical forms for which they stand. So in dealing with Maxwell’s theory it is not necessary to resort to mathematics. Although electrical truths are most readily and most accurately expressed in this universalPREFACE. xi shorthand of the sciences, it is none the less possible to trans- late them, as it were, into the language of every-day life, and thus cause them to appeal more directly to the un- derstanding. That M. Poincaré is, of ail men, qualified to do this, no one familiar with his classic mathematical works on the subject will question; and with reference to Part One I need only say that I hâve endeavored to follow the original with as literal exactness as is practicable in a translation, striving to preserve the thought of the author without sacrificing the vigorous suggestiveness of his style. The illustrations, how- ever, I hâve prepared especially for this volume, witb the exception of a few diagrams which appeared in the original, and which hâve been redrawn. In Part Two it has been my purpose to take up the thread where M. Poincaré dropped it, carrying the line of thought into the practical field of wireless telegraphy, and applying the principles laid down in Part One to the varions problème involved; to describe certain typical Systems, to show why some hâve failed while others succeeded, and to explain their mode of operation in the light of MaxwelFs ideas. This is not intended as a treatise on wireless telegraphy — no attempt is made to describe the myriad forms of apparatus nor to settle questions of priority and history. Such ma- terial is readily accessible to those who may desire it. The object is rather to deal with principles and to trace the de- velopment of the art in its essential features. Where spécifie cases are cited they are chosen with reference to their fitness to illustrate an idea or to serve as milestones on the path of progress, and they are treated with a view to emphasize that which is essential and minimize superficial or unimportant details.PREFACE. xii In Chapter IV is discussed the question of wave-propo- gation over a conducting surface, and various hypothèses are reviewed and tested in the light of the preceding chapters. In approaching a conclusion it has seemed advisable to de- part a little from the purely Maxwellian idea of displace- ment currents, which does not readily appeal to the imagina- tion in this connection, and to substitute Faraday’s conception of moving tubes of induction, which embodies the same principles in more tangible form. It is hoped that this figure, so successfully used by J. J. Thomson in explain- ing other electrical phenomena, may give the reader a clear understanding of what takes place when an electromagnetie wave glides over the surface of the earth. The other chapters are self-explanatory and need not be considered here. I desire to acknowledge my indebtedness to M. Poincaré for his most courteous permission to translate and publish the work that appears as Part One, and to the manv writers on whom I hâve drawn for references and historical data. My thanks are due also to the Macmillan Company for permis- sion to copy some of the figures illustrating the work of Hertz, and to the publishers for their hearty coopération in seeing the work through the press. Frederick K. Vreeland. New York, January, 1904.PART ONE. MAXWELL’S THEORY AND HERTZIAN OSCILLA- TIONS.PART ONE. MAXWELL’S THEORY AND HERTZIAN OSCILLA- TIONS. CHAPTER I. GENERALIZATIONS REGARDING ELECTRICAL PHE- NOMENA. 1. Attempts at Mechanical Explanation.— To give a com- plété mechanical explanation of electrical phenomena, reduc- ing the laws of physics to the fundamental principles of dynamics, is a problem that has attracted many investigatcrs. But is it not rather a fruitless task, and will not our efforts be expended in vain ? If the problem admitted of only one solution, the posses- sion of this solution, which would be the truth, could not be bought too dearly. But this is not the case. It is doubtless possible to devise a mechanism giving a more or less perfect imitation of electrostatic and electrodynamic phenomena ; but if we can imagine one such mechanism, we can also imagine an infinity of others. Among them ail, we do not at présent find one that appeals to our choice on the score of simplicity, nor is it évident that any one would enable us, better than the others, to penetrate the secret of nature. Ail those that hâve been proposed hâve a savor of artificiality which is ré- pugnant to the reason. [1]2 MAXWELL’S THEORY. One of the most complété of these was developed by Max- well, at a time when his ideas had not yet taken definite form. .The complicated structure wThich he attributed to the ether rendered his System strange and unattractive ; one seemed to be reading the description of a workshop with gearing, with rods transmitting motion and bending under the effort, with wheels, belts and governors. Whatever may be the taste of the English for conceptions of this kind, whose concrète appearance appeals to them, Max- well was the first to abandon his own extraordinary theory, and it does not appear in his complété works. But we cannot regret that his mind followed this by-path, since it was thus led to the most important discoveries. In following the same course, it seems hardly possible to obtain a better resuit. But if it is vain to attempt to picture the mechanism of electrical phenomena in ail its details, it is nevertheless important to show that these phenomena obey the general laws of mechanics. These laws, in fact, are independent of the particular mechanism to which they apply : they must remain invariable throughout the diversity of their manifestations. If the electrical phenomena are exceptions, we must abandon ail hope of a mechanical explanation; but if they conform to these laws, the possibility of such explanation is assured, and we are confronted onlv by the difficulty of choosing ainong the various solutions wThich the problem admits. But how can we assure ourselves, without following ail the complications of mathematical analysis, of the conformity of the laws of electrostatics and electrodynamics to the general principles of dynamics ? By a sériés of comparisons. When we wish to analyze an electrical phenomenon, we shall take one or two well-known mechanical phenomena and endeavor to show their perfect parallelism. This parallelism will thusELECTRICAL PHENOMENA. 3 be a sufficient proof of the possibility of a mechanical expla- nation. The use of mathematical analysis would serve only to show that these analogies are not merely rough approximations, but may be followed into the most minute details. The limits of this work will not permit us to go thus far, and we must be content with a comparison, as it were, qualitative. 2. Electrostatic Phenomena.— In charging a condenser energy is always expended; mechanical work if we turn a statical machine or a dynamo, Chemical energy if we charge it with a battery. But the energy thus expended is not lost ; + Fig. 1.— Two conductors are charged to different potentials and then conneeted by a wire. A current flows from one to the other until the potentials are equalized. it is stored in the condenser, to be liberated again when the condenser is discharged. It will be liberated in the form of heat if the two plates of the condenser are simply joined by a wire, which is heated by the discharge current ; or it may be made to take the form of mechanical work by causing the discharge current to operate a little electric motor. Similarly, to raise the level of water in a réservoir, work must be done ; but this work may be given back, if, for exam- ple, the water in the réservoir be used to turn a water-wheel. If two conductors be charged to the same potential, and then conneeted by a wire, the equilibrium will not be dis-4 MAXWELL1 S THEORY. turbed ; but if the initial potentials be different, a current will flow through the wire from one conductor to the other until the equality of potential is established. (Fig. 1.) Similarly, if the water in two réservoirs stand at different levels and thje réservoirs be joined by a pipe, water will flow from one to the other until it stands at the same level in both. (Fig. 2.) The parallelism is thus complété: the 'potential of a con- denser corresponds to the height of the water in a réservoir, the charge of the condenser to the mass of the water contained in the réservoir. + Fig. 2.— Hydraulic analogue of the charged conductors. The height of water represents the potential ; the mass of the water, the charge on the conductor ; the cross-section of the réservoir, the capacity of the con- ductor. For example, if the horizontal section of the réservoir be 100 square meters, one cubic meter of water will be re- quired to raise the level one centimeter. If the section be twice as great, double the quantity of water will be required. The horizontal section thus corresponds to what is called the capacity of the condenser. How can we interpret in this manner the attractions and repulsions which are exerted betweçn electrified bodies ? These mechanical forces tend to diminish the différence of potential between the bodies. If they be opposed, as when two mutually attracting bodies are separated, work is done, electrical energy is stored up, and the différence of potentialELECTRICAL PHEXOMENA. 5 is increased. If, on the other hand, the conductors be left free to obey their mutual attractions, the stored-np electrical energy is partly given up in the form of mechanical work, and the potentials tend to be equalized. These mechanical forces thus correspond to the pressures exerted on the walls of the réservoirs by the water which they contain. Suppose, for example, that our two réservoirs be joined by a horizontal cylindrical pipe of large cross-section, in which is fitted a piston. (Fig. 3.) When the piston is moved in snch a direction as to force water into the réser- voir where the level is already higher than in the other, work is expended ; if, on the other hand, the piston be left free to Fig. 3.— The mechanical force between two oppositely charged bodies tends to diminish their différence of potential. If this force be opposed, as when the piston is forced against the pressure, work is done, energy is stored, the différence of potential is increased. yield to the pressures on its opposite faces, it will be dis- placed in such a way that the wàter-levels tend to be equal- ized, and part of the energy stored in the réservoirs will be released. This hvdraulic analogy is the most convenient and most complété ; but it is not the only one possible. For instance, we might compare the work done in charging a condenser to that required to raise a weight or compress a spring. The energy thus expended is given back when the weight is ah kuved to descend, or the spring is released, just as wrhen the two plates of a condenser are allowTed to obey their mutual attractions.G MAXWELL9S THEORY. In the following pages we shall make use of ail three analo- gies. 3. Résistance of Conductors.— Suppose our two réservoirs to be joined together by a long, horizontal tube of small cross-section. (Fig. 4.) The water will run slowly through this tube, and the flow will increase as we increase the dif- férence of level in the réservoirs and the cross-section of the tube, or as we diminish its length. In other words, the ré- sistance of the tube, being due to internai friction, increases with its length and with a diminution of its area. Similarly, if we connect two conductors by a long, slender wire, the flow of electricity will increase with the différence “31 II 1 III Il 1 Üi ** raicnortRL «?ts»sTa>ice. “ —g;1 =i — Fig. 4.— Ohmic résistance is analogous to friction of water flowing through a slender tube. The flow dépends upon the différence in level, the bore of the tube and (inversely) on its length. The energy lost goes into beat. of potential and with the cross-section of the wire, and will vary inversely as its length. The electrical résistance of a wire is therefore comparable to the hydraulic résistance of our tube: it is a kind of fric- tion. The similarity is the more complété, for the résistance causes the wire to become heated as in the case of mechanical friction. This effect is strikingly shown in the well-known experi- ment of Foucault. When a dise of copper is caused to rotate in a magnetic field, a considérable force is required to turn it, and the dise becomes heated, precisely as if the dise were rubbing against an invisible brake.ELECTRICAL PHENOMENA. 7 4. Induction.— If two wires be placed close together, and one of them carry a variable current, currents will also be produced in the second. If the primary current be in- creasing, the secondary current will be in the opposite direc- tion to the primary : if the primary be decreasing, the second- ary will be in the saine direction. The currents in the second- ary circuit are known as induced currents, and the phenome- non is called mutual induction. But this is not ail. A variable current produces electro- motive forces of induction in the wire traversed by the cur- rent itself. This force is opposing if the current be increas- ing, but it tends to augment the current when the latter is decreasing. This effect is called self-induction. In our mechanical analogy, self-induction is easily ex- plained. It seems that, to set electricity in motion, we must overcome a counter-electromotive reaction; but once the motion is commenced, it tends to continue of itself. Self- induction is thus a sort of inertia. Similarly, a reaction must be overcome in starting a vehi- cle in motion; but, once it is started, the motion tends to continue of itself. To recapitulate, a current may hâve to overcome : First. The ohmic résistance of the circuit (which always exists and always opposes the current). Seco?id. Self-induction, if the current is variable. Third. Counter-electromotive forces of electrostatic origin, if there are electrical charges in the neighborhood of the cir- cuit or upon it. The last two reactions may become négative and tend to augment the current. Compare these reactions with those encountered by a ve- hicle moving along a road :8 MAXWELL’S THEORY. First. Ohmic résistance, \ve hâve seen, is analogous to friction. Second. Self-induction corresponds to the inertia cf the vehicle. Third. The forces of electrostatic origin are like the weight, which opposes the motion when ascending a grade, and assists when descending. For mutual induction the matter is a little more compli- cated. Imagine a sphere, S, of considérable mass, which car- ries two arms at diametrically opposite points; and at the ends of these arms, two small spheres, Si and s2. (Fig- 5.) Pig. 5.— Mechanical model illustrating the phenomena of mutual in- duction. The small spheres, sx and s2, represent two mutually inductive circuits ; the sphere, S, of large mass, the ether which surrounds them. Any variation in the velocity of sx (primarily current), induces a velocity in s2 (secondary current), on account of the inertia of S. S represents the ether, sx the primary current, and s2 the secondary current. If we wish to set the little sphere Si. in motion it offers little opposition; but the sphere S does not start so readily. For the first instant it remains motionless and the whole System turns about it as a center, the sphere s2 moving in the oppo- site direction to Si. This represents the action of mutual induction. The spheres Si and s2 correspond to the two conductors; the sphere S, which we must imagine invisible, is the ether which surrounds them. When the motion of Si is accelerated, s2 moves in the opposite direction ; similarly, when the primaryELECTRIC AL PUENOMENA. 9 current increases, a secondary current is induced in the oppo- site direction. Pursuing the analogy, suppose the motion of Si and s2 to he retarded by a sort of friction (the ohmic résistance of the two conductors), while S has no résistance to overcome but its ewn inertia; and suppose the motive force to act con- tinuously on Si. When a condition of uniform motion is finally established, the sphere Si will move at a constant ve- locity, carrying with it S, which, once in motion, offers no further résistance. The sphere s2, by virtue of its friction, will remain motionless," and the whole System will revolve about it. The primary current has become constant; the secondary current has ceased. Finally, if the motive force cease to act on Si, its velocity will be reduced by its friction. But S, by virtue of its great inertia, continues to move, carrying with it s2, which acquires a velocity in the same direction as that of Si. The primary current decreases; the secondary current flows in the same direction as the primary. In this figure, S represents the ether which surrounds the wires; it is the inertia of the ether which produces the phe- nomena of mutual induction. The same is true of self-in- duction : the inertia which must be overcome in starting a current in a wire is not that of the ether which pénétrâtes the wTire, but of the ether which surrounds it. 5. Electrodynamic Attraction.— We hâve endeavored above te give, by analogy, an explanation of electrostatic attrac- tions, and of the phenomena of induction. Let us now see what idea Maxwell offers as to the cause of the mutual attrac- tions of currents. If electrostatic attractions were due to the tension of a multitude of tiny springs, or, in other words, to the elasticity of the ether, the kinetic energy and the inertia of this fluid10 MAXWELL’S THEORY. would give rise to the phenomena of induction and electrodv- namic actions. The complété analysis is much too long to find place liere, and we must again limit ourselves to an analogy. We shall find it in a well-known device,— the centrifugal governor. {Fig. 6.) Fig. 6.— Model illustrating the mechanical action of currents. The halls tend to separate, thus increas- ing their kinetic energy if the angular velocity be kept constant. This energy is supplied from with- out in overcoming the inertia reac- tion due to the séparation. Fig. 7.— Two currents in oppo- site directions repel each other, tending to separate and thus in- crease the kinetic energy of the System for constant current. This energy is. supplied from the source in overcoming the counter E.M.F. due to the séparation. The kinetic energy of this apparatus is proportional to the square of the angular velocity of its rotation, and to the square of the displacement of the halls from the axis. According to Maxwell’s hypothesis, the ether is in motion whenever there are electric currents, and its kinetic energy is proportional to the square of the intensity of the currents. This intensity thus corresponds, in the analogy which we are endeavoring to establish, to the angular velocity of rotation.ELECTRICAL PHEXOMEXA. 11 If we consider two currents in the same direction, the kinetic energy, for a given intensity of çurrent, will beeome greater as the currents approach each other. If the currents üow in opposite directions, it will be greater as they are far- ther separated. (Fig. 7.) This being granted, we may pursue the analogy. To increase the angular velocity of the governor, and hence its kinetic energy, it is necessary to do work, and hence to overcome a reaction, called its inertia, Similarly, increasing the strength of the currents increases the kinetic energy of the ether; and to do this requires the doing of work and the overcoming of a reaction, which is sim- ply the inertia of the ether, and is called induction. The kinetic energy will be greatest when the currents are in the same direction and close together ; the work to be done in producing them and the counter-electromotive force of in- duction are thus greatest. This is what is meant when we say, in ordinary language, that the mutual induction of two currents is added to their self-induction. The reverse is true if the currents are in opposite directions. If the balls of the governor be separated, energy must be supplied if the angular velocity is to be maintained ; because, for a given angular velocity, the kinetic energy increases as the balls are separated. Similarly, if two currents in the same direction be brought together, work must be done to maintain their intensity, be- cause the kinetic energy is increased. Hence, there is an clectromotive force of induction to be overcome, which tends to diminish the strength of the currents. On the other hand, it would tend to increase them if they were in the same di- rection and were separated, or if they were in opposite direc- tions, and were brought together.12 MAXWELL9S THEORY. The mutual mechanical actions of currents may be simi- larly explained. The centrifugal force tends to separate the balls of the governor, wliich would hâve the effect of increasing the kinetic energy if the angular velocity were kept constant. Similarly, when the two currents are in the same direction, . they attract each other ; that is, they tend to corne together, which would liave the effect of increasing the kinetic energy if the currents were maintained constant. If the currents are in opposite directions, they repel each other, and tend to separate; which would again hâve the effect of increasing the kinetic energy for a constant strength of current. Thus, the electrostatic phenomena are explained by the elas- ticity of the ether, and electrodynamic phenomena by its kinetic energy. But should this elasticity itself be explained, as Lord Kelvin thinks, by the rotation of minute portions of the fluid ? Various considérations render this hypothesis attractive, but it plays no essential part in the theory of Max- well, which is independent of it. In ail the preceding we hâve made comparisons with vari- ous mechanisms; but they are simply analogies,— indeed, rather crude ones. Moreover, we must not expect to find in MaxwelFs work a complété mechanical explanation of elec- trical phenomena, but only a portrayal of the conditions which ail such explanations must satisfy; indeed, the great element of permanency in MaxwelFs work is this fact, that it is independent of ail particular explanations.CHAPTEE IL MAXWELL’S THEORY. 1. Relations between Light and Electricity.—At the time when the experiments of Fresnel were forcing the scientifie world to admit that light is due to the vibrations of a subtle fiuid, filling interplanetary space, the researches of Ampère revealed the laws of the mntnal action of electric currents, and laid the foundation of electrodynamics. It was but a step farther to suppose that this same fluid, the ether, which is the seat of luminous phenomena, is also the medium for electrical action. This step was taken by Ampère; but the illustrious physicist, in proposing his at- tractive hypothesis, could hardly hâve foreseen that it would so soon take a more précisé form and begin to receive its con- firmation. It was indeed only a dream without foundation until electrical measurements brought to light an unexpected fact. The ratio of the “ absolute electrostatic unit ” to the “ ab- solute electromagnetic unit” is measured by a velocity. Max- well devised several methods for deriving the value of this velocity, and the results which he obtained fell in the vicinity of 300,000 kilometers per second; that is, the velocity of light The observations were soon made so précisé that it was impossible to attribute the coincidence to chance, and there was no longer any doubt of the existence of some intimate relation between optical and electrical phenomena. But the nature of this relation might still hâve remained a mystery if the genius of Maxwell had not divined it. [13]14 MAXWELL’® TÜEORY. The remarkable coincidence may be explained in the fol* lowing way: Along a wire of perfect conductivity an elec- trical disturbance would be propagated with the velocity of liglit. The calculations of Kirchhoff, founded on the old electrodynamic theory, led to this resuit. But it is not along a wire that light is propagated, but through transparent bodies, through the air, through space. Such a propagation as this was not accounted for by the old electrodynamies. Before the principles oi optics could be derived from the electrodynamic théories then in vogue, the latter had to undergo serions modifications without ceasing to take account of ail known facts. This reconstruction wa& the work of Maxwell. 2. Displacement Currents.— It is well known that mate* rial bodies may be divided into two classes : the conductors, in which we can produ.ee displacements of electricity, that isr volt aie currents, and the insulators, or dielectrics. To the earlv electricians, the dielectrics were quite inert, and their function was simplv to oppose the passage of electricity. If this were the case, any insulator whatever could be replaced by a different one without in the least changing the phe- nomena. The experiments of Faraday showed that this is not so : Two condensers of the same form and the same di- mensions, connected to the same source of electricity, do not take the same charge, even though the thickness of the insu- lating layer be the same ; provided the nature of the insulat* ing material is different. Maxwell had made too profound a study of Faraday’s researches to overlook the importance of the dielectrics, and the necessity of giving them their proper significance. Moreover, if it be true that light is an electrical phenome- non, then when light is propagated through an insulating body, this insulator must be the seat of the phenomenon.MAXWELL’,8 THEORY. 15 Thus there must be localized electrical phenomena in the di- electrics. But what is their nature ? Maxwell replies boldly tliey are currents. Ail the known facts of his time seemed to contradict him :: never had a current been observed except in a conductor. . How could Maxwell reconcile his audacious hypothesis with a fact so well established ? Why do these hypothetical cur- rents produce manifest effects under certain circumstances, and yet are absolutely unobservable under ordinary condi- tions ? It is because the dielectrics offer to the passage of electric- ity, not a great-er résistance than the conductors, but a résist- ance of a different nature. An analogy will make Maxwell’s idea more intelligible. If we undertake to compress a spring we encounter an opposing force which increases as the spring yields to the pressure. If, now, wTe can exert only a limited pressure, a moment will arrive when we can no longer overcome the reacting force ; the movement will cease, and equilibrium will be established. Finally, wdien the pressure is removed, the spring will regain its original form, giving back ail the energy that was expended in compressing it. Suppose, on the other hand, that we wish to move a body immersed in water. Here again we encounter a reaction, which dépends upon the velocity, but which, if the velocity remain constant, does not go on increasing as the body yields to the pressure. The motion will thus continue as long as the motive force acts, and equilibrium will never be established. Finally, when the force is removed, the body does not tend to return to the starting point, and the energy expended in moving it cannot be restored ; it has been completely trans- formed into heat through the viscositv of the water. The contrast is manifest, and it is important to distinguisk16 MAXWELL’S THEORY. between elastic reaction and viscoas reaction. Kow, the di- electrics behave toward the motion of electricity as elastic solids do toward the motion of matter, while the conductors behave likeviscous liquids. Hence there are two kinds of currents: the displacement cnrrents of Maxwell, which tra- verse the dielectrics, and the ordinary conduction cnrrents which flow in conductors. The former, having to overcome a sort of elastic reaction, must be of short duration, for this reaction increases as long Fig. 8.— Model illustrating the flow of a displacement current in a dielectric C. The pressure in the vessel represents the voltage of the bat- tery ; the height of the column, the displacement in the dielectric ; the flow of water, the charging current. The energy expended may be recovered. as the current continues to flow and equilibrium must soon be established. Conduction currents, on the other hand, must overcome a sort of viscous résistance, and hence may continue as long as the electromotive force which produces them. Resuming our hydraulic analogy, suppose that we hâve a closed vessel containing water under pressure. (Fig- 8.) IfMAXWELL’S TÜEORY. 17 we put tins vessel in communication with a vertical pipe, tlie water will rise in it, but the flow will cease when the hydro- static equilibrium is established. If the pipe be large, therc will be no appréciable friction nor loss of head, and the water thus raised may be used to do work. We hâve here an il- lustration of displacement currents. If, on the other hand, the water be allowed to run out through a horizontal pipe (Fig. 9), the flow will continue as long as there is water in the réservoir; but, if the pipe be small, there will be a considérable loss of energy, and heat Fig. 9.— Model illustrating the flow of a conduction current in a con- ductor, R. The flow continues undiminished as long as the pressure is maintained. The energy expended in friction takes the form of heat and is lost. will be produced by the friction. This illustrâtes the action of conduction currents. Although it is impossible, and unnecessary, to try to im- agine ail the details of the mechanism, we may say that ail takes places as if the displacement currents had the effect of compressing a multitude of minute springs. When the cur- rents cease, electrostatic equilibrium is established; and the tension of the springs dépends upon the intensity of the elec- trostatic field. The energy accumulated in these springs, that is, the electrostatic energy of the field, may be restored when- ever they are allowed to unbend ; and it is thus that mechani- 218 MAXWELL'S THEORY. cal work is produced when charged conductors are allowed to obey their electrostatic attractions. These attractions are thus due to the pressure exerted pn the conductors by the compressed springs. Finally, to pursue the analogy to the end, a disruptive discharge may be attributed to the breaking of sonie springs which are unable to stand the strain. On the other hand, the energy expended in producing con- duction currents is lost, and converted into heat, like the work done in overcoming friction or the viscosity of fluids. This is why a conductor is heated by the passage of a ouvrent» Fig. 10.— The old explanation of the charging of a condenser. The electricity was supposed to accumu- late on the surface of the plates, as indicated by the dotted lines. The circuit was thus considered un- closed. Fig. 11.— Maxwell’s idea of the phenomenon of charging a con- denser. The current does not stop at the surface of the conductor, but continues to flow, as a displace- raent current, through the dielectric, until checked by the elastic reaction. The circuit is thus completed. From Maxwell’s point of view, none but closed currents exist. To the early electricians, this was not the case. They considered as closed the current which circulâtes in a wire joining the two terminais of a batterv. But if, instead of joining these terminais directly, they were connected respec- tively to the two plates of a condenser, the momentarv cur- rent which flowed while the condenser was being chargedMAXWELL’g THEORY. 19 was considered as unclosed. (Fig. 10.) It flowed, they said, from one plate to the other through the wire counected to tlie battery, and stopped at the surfaces of the plates. Maxwell, on the contrary, considers that the current continues, in the form of a displacement current, across the insulating layer which séparâtes the plates, and is thus completely closed. (Fig. 11.) The elastic reaction which the current en- counters in traversing the dielectric explains its short dura- tion. Currents may manifest themselves in three ways : by their heating effects, by their action on magnets and on other cur- rents, by the induced currents which they generate. We hâve seen above why conduction currents produce heat and dis- placement currents do not. Yet, according to Maxwell’s hy- pothesis, the currents which he imagines should, like ordinary currents, produce electromagnetic, electrodynamic, and induc- tive effects. Why could these effects not be observed? Because a dis- placement current, however feeble, cannot continue long in one direction; for the tension of our hypothetical springs, continually increasing, will soon check it. Thus we cannot hâve in a dielectric either a continuons current of long dura- tion or a sensible alternating current of long period ; but the effects should be observable if the alternations are very rapid. 3. The Nature of Light.—And here we hâve, according to Maxwell, the origin of light: A light wave is a sériés of alternating currents, flowing in a dielectric, in the air, or in interplanetary space, changing their direction 1,000,000,000,000,000 times in a second. The enormous in- ductive effect of these rapid alternations produces other cur- rents in the neighboring portions of the dielectric, and thus the light waves are propagated from place to place. The ve-20 MAXWELL’S THEORY. locity of propagation may be shown analytically to be equal to the ratio of the units, that is, to the velocity of light. These alternating currents are a kind of electrical vibration ; but are they longitudinal, like those of Sound (Fig. 12), or k------------------^------------------------* Fig. 12.— Mode of propagation of a longitudinal vibration, such as a Sound wave. The crowding and separating of the parallel Unes repre- sent condensations and rarifactions of the air, and the arrows indicate the motion of individual particles. transverse, like those of Fresnel’s ether? ( Fig. 13.) In the case of sound, the air undergoes altemate condensations and rarifactions ; but the ether of Fresnel acts as if it were com- posed of incompressible layers capable only of sliding upon each other. If the currents flowed in unclosed circuits, the 1-4 ■*> Fig. 13.— Mode of propagation of a transverse wave, such as light. There are no changes of density, and the displacements in the ether are perpendicular to the line of propagation. electricity would necessarily accumulate at one end or the other of the circuits, and we should hâve a condition analo- gous to the condensations and rarifactions of air: the vibra- tions would be longitudinal. But, as Maxwell admits only closed currents, these accumulations are impossible, and theMAXWELL’S THEORY. 21 electricity must behave like the incompressible ether of Fres- nel : its vibrations must be transverse. Thns we reach ail the conclusions of the wave theory of light. This, however, was not enough to enable the physi- cists, wrho were attracted rather than convinced, to accept absolutely Maxwell’s ideas: ail that could be said in their favor was, that they did not conflict with any known facts, and that it were indeed a pity if they were not true. The experimental confirmation was lacking, and remained so for twenty-five years. It was necessary to find, between the old theory and that of Maxwell, a discrepancy not too minute for our crude methods of observation. There was only one such f rom which an experimentum crucis could be derived. To do this was the work of Hertz, which we shall now discuss.CHAPTER III. ELECTRICAL oscillations before hertz. 1. Experiments of Feddersen.— Alternating currents were produced at a very early date by inechanical means, such as the use of rotating commutators, vibrators, etc. These were indeed, in a sense, electrical oscillations, but their fre- quency was necessarily very low. The discharge of a condenser furnished the means of ob- taining much more rapid oscillations, and it was Feddersen who first demonstrated experimentally that, under certain circumstances, the discharge of a Leyden jar may be oscil- latory. Feddersen observed the spark produced in discharging a Leyden jar, by means of a rotating concave mirror. He also projected an image of the spark, by such a mirror, upon a sensitive plate, and thus photographed it under various condi- tions. He varied the résistance of the circuit. With a low résist- ance he obtained an oscillatory discharge, and the arrange- ment of his apparatus enabled him to see how the frequency of oscillation varied with the capacity of the condenser and the self-induction of the circuit. To vary the capacity he simply changed the number of Leyden jars, and thus showed approximately that the period is proportional to the square root of the capacity. To vary the self-induction, Feddersen changed the length of the discharge circuit, and showed the period to be approxi- mately proportional to the square root of the self-induction ; but approximately only, because in his experiments the [22]OSCILLATIONS BEFORE HERTZ. 23 length of the circuit reached sometimes several hundred meters; it was suspended on the wall and formed with this a condenser whose capacity was not at ail negligible with re- spect to that of the main condenser. As for the numerical coefficient, Feddersen could not dé- termine its value, for lie did not know accurately the capacity of his condensers ; he could only verify the proportionalities. Feddersen obtained periods of the order of 10'4 seconds. By gradually increasing the résistance, which he did by inserting in the circuit small tubes filled with sulfuric acid, he obtained, first, continuous discharges, then intermittent ones; the latter for very large values of the résistance, ob- tained by means of wet cords. It is évident that, in a rotating mirror, a continuous dis- charge should appear as a continuous band of light ; an alter- nating or intermittent discharge, as a sériés of separate, bright spots. The photographs of alternating discharges obtained by Feddersen presented a peculiar appearance. There was a sériés of bright and dark points corresponding to the two ends of the spark; but the luminous points for one end corre- sponded to the dark points for the other, and vice versa. This is easily explained: When a disruptive discharge takes place in air, the particles torn from the positive élec- trode become incandescent, but this is not the case with the négative particles: the positive end of the spark is thus brighter than the négative. Feddersen’s photographs thus proved that each end of the spark is alternately positive and négative. Hence the dis- charge is not intermittent and always in the same direction, but is oscillatory. 2. Lord Kelvin’s Theory.— The experiments of Feddersen may be easily explained :24 MAXWELU8 THEORY. Suppose two eonductors (in Feddersen’s experiments they were the two coatings of the condenser) to be connected by a wire. If they are not at the same potential, the electrical equilibrium Avili be disturbed, just as the mechanical equili- from the vertical. Each represents a store of energy, ready to be re- leased. brium is disturbed wlien a pendulum is displaced from the vertical. (Fig. 14.) In either case there will be a tendency to re-establish the equilibrium. A current will flow through the wire in the effort to equalize the potentials of the two Fig. 15.— When the condenser is discharged and the pendulum has swung to the vertical, the energy is not lost, but has taken the form of current in the one case, velocity in the other. These are alike in their tendency to continue. eonductors, and the pendulum will swing towrard the verti- cal. (Fig. 15.) But the pendulum will not stop in the position of equilib- rium; having acquired a certain velocity, its inertia willOSCILLATIONS BEFORE HERTZ. 25 carry it beyond this position. Similarly, when our conduct- ors are discharged, the momentary condition of equilibrium does not last, but is at once destroyed by a cause analogous to inertia — the self-induction of the circuit. We hâve learned that, when a current ceases to flow, it induces a cur- rent in the same direction in a neighboring conductor. A similar effect is produced in the circuit of the inducing cur- rent itself, which is thus continued, as it were, by the induced current. In other words, a current persists after the cessation of the Fig. 16.— The current has ceased, and the condenser is again charged, but with reversed polarity. The pendulum has reached the extreme limit of its swing, and is ready for the return journey. cause which produced it, just as a moving body continues in motion after the force which started it is removed. Thus, the two potentials having been equalized, the current continues in the same direction, and charges the conductors again, but with reversed polarities. (Fig. 16.) In this case, as in that of the pendulum, the position of equilibrium hav- ing been passed, the motion must be reversed in order to re- turn to it: again the momentary equilibrium is established, and again it is destroyed in the same way ; and thus the oscil- lations continue. It is readily shown analytically that the period of oscilla-26 MAXWELL9S THEORY. tion varies with the capacity; hence, by diminishing this capacity, which is easily done, we may obtain an “ electrical pendulum ” capable of producing extremely rapid oscilla- tions. 3. Other Analogies.— In explaining the theory of Lord Kelvin we hâve compared the electrical oscillations with those of a pendulum, but there are many other analogies which would serve equally well. Instead of a pendulum, take, for example, a tuning fork: if its arms be bent from their position of equilibrium, their elasticity tends to bring them back; but, impelled by their inertia, they swing past it; their elasticity brings them back again, and again they swing past, and so on : they perform a sériés of oscillations. Here the elasticity of the fork plays the same part as the weight of the pendulum, and as the electrostatic force in the oscillatory discharge of the Leyden jar; the inertia of the fork takes the place of the inertia of the pendulum and the self-induction of the circuit. But our hvdraulic analogy is perhaps even better. Sup- pose two vessels to be joined by a horizontal tube : when the water is in equilibrium its level is the same in both vessels. But if in any wav this equalitv of level be destroyed, it will tend to be re-established ; the water will fall in vessel A, where it was above the normal level, and will rise in vessel B, where it was below the normal. The water in the tube will be set in motion, flowing from A to B. But when the equalitv of level is established, the motion Avili not cease, on account of the inertia of the water in the tube ; the water will rise in vessel B and fall in A. The flow will then commence in the opposite direction, the phenomenon will be repeated in the opposite sense, and so on. (Fig. 17.) Here again we hâve a sériés of oscillations ; but what deter-OSCILLATIONS BEFORE HERTZ. 27 mines their period ? It increases with the horizontal sec- tion of the vessels (which we shall imagine cylindrical). Thus, if a litre of water be transferred from one vessel to the other, the différence of level caused by this transfer will be less, in proportion as the cross-section of the vessels is greater. Hence the motive force will be smaller, and the oscillations slower. On the other hand, the period will increase with the length of the tube. To transfer a litre of water from one vessel to the other, ail the w’ater in the tube must be set in motion; a. b- «_—■ T —1 Fio. 17.— Hydraulic analogue of the oscillatory discharge of a con- denser. The period dépends upon the cross-section of the vessels A and B, and on the length of the tube T, which correspond to the capacity and self-induction of the circuit. If the friction in the tube is too great the flow ceases to be oscillatory. (See p. 28.) hence the inertia to be overcome increases with the length of the tube, and the oscillations become slower. We hâve seen in Chapter I that the horizontal section of the vessels corresponds to the capacity of a circuit, the length of the tube to its self-induction. The period of an electrical oscillation thus increases with the capacity and with the self-induction. 4. Damping.— The oscillations of a pendulum do not con- tinue indefinitely ; each swing is a little smaller than the pre- ceding one, and, after a certain number of oscillations of de- creasing amplitude, the pendulum cornes to rest. This is due to friction.28 MAXWELL^ THEORY. Xow, we hâve seen that, in electrodynamic phenomena, there is an agency which plays the same part as mechanical friction, i. e., ohmic résistance. Electrical oscillations mnst then decay like those of a pendulum ; they mnst grow weaker and weaker, decreasing in amplitude, and finally cease. This diminution is called damping. (See Fig. 18.) Friction does not appreciably afFect the period of a pen- dulum; and similarly, fhe ohmic résistance does not, as a rule, sensibly change the period of electrical oscillations : they Fig. 18.—Oscillatory discharge of a condenser, calculated for the values of capacity C, inductance L, and résistance R indicated above. grow smaller and smaller, but they do not become much less rapid. In certain experiments, however, Feddersen employed very great résistances, and the period, as we might imagine, be- came notablv longer. An extreme case is that in which the discharge ceases to be oscillatory. (Fig. 19.) Imagine a pendulum immersed in a very thick and viscous fluid. Instead of descending with an increasing velocity, it moves slowly, arrives without velocity at its position of equilibrium, and does not swing beyond. There are no oscillations.OSCILLATIONS BEFORE HERTZ, 29 It is on this principle that aperiodic or “ dead beat ” gal- vancnieters are constrncted. The needle is mounted close to a plate of copper, in winch Foucault currents are induced by iis motion; hence the needle encounters a considérable résistance, which retards it as friction would do. Thus, instead of oscillating from one side to the other of its posi- tion of equilibrium, wdiich would make the instrument dif- licult to read, it swings gently up to the point, and stops. These mechanical illustrations will suffice to show the nature of the discharge of a Leyden jar where the ohmic Fig. 19.—- Unidirectional discharge of a condenser. The conditions are the same as in Fig. 18, except for the increased résistance. Curve A is the critical case of quickest discharge. For smaller values of R the dis- charge becomes oscillatory. Curves B and C are for larger values of R. résistance is very great. The condition of electrical equi- librium is attained slowly, and is not overpassed. The dis- charge is no longer oscillatory, but continuous. This is just wThat was shown by the experiments of Feddersen, which thus confirai completely the theory of Lord Kelvin. Friction and analogous reactions are not the only causes of damping, and the kinetic energy of oscillating bodies is not ail converted into heat. Consider again a tuning fork, whose vibrations diminish gradually in amplitude. ITn- questionably there are frictional effects which slightly heat30 MAXWELL’8 THEORY. the fork, but, at the same time, we hear a sound : the air is set in motion, and takes up energy from the fork. Part oi the energy is thus dissipated by a sort of radiation into space. The energy of electrical oscillations also is expended in two ways: ohinic résistance transforms a part of it into- heat, but we shall soon see that another part is radiated into space without losing its electrical character. This is a phe- nomenon which was predicted by MaxwelPs theory, and which is contrary to the old electrodynamics. Thus we see that electrical oscillations undergo two kinds of damping: by ohmic résistance (analogous to friction)> and by radiation.CHAPTER IV. HERTZ’S OSCILLATOR. 1. Hertz’s Discovery.— The displacement currents pre- dicted by Maxwell’s theory could not, under ordinary circum- stances, manifest their existence. As we hâve seen, they hâve to overcome an elastic reaction which increases continually as long as they continue to flow ; hence they must be either very feeble, or of very short duration, if they flow always in the same direction. In order that their effects may be appré- ciable, they must change frequently in direction; the alter- nations must be very rapid. Industrial altçrnating currents, and even the oscillations of Feddersen, are entirely too slow for this purpose. This is the reason that Maxwell’s ideas waited twenty years for experimental confirmation, and to Hertz was reserved the honor of giving it. This eminent scientist, whose life was so short and so full, contemplated at first the career of an archi- tect, but was soon drawn by an irrésistible impulse toward pure science. Noticed and encouraged by Helmholtz, he was appointed professer at Carlsruhe: it is there that he made the researches which hâve immortalized his name, and rose in a day from obscurity to famé. But he was not destined to enjoy it long; he had barely time to complété his new laboratory at Bonn, when illness prevented him from utilizing its resources ; and soon he died, leaving behind him, besides his monumental discovery, experiments of great importance on cathode rays and an original and profound book on the philosophy of mechanics. C31]32 MAXWELL9» THEORY. 2. Principle of the Oscillator.— The problem, as has been explained, was to obtain extremely rapid vibrations. It would seem, according to what we hâve seen in Chapter III, that it would only be necessary to repeat the experiments of Fedder- sen with diminished capacity and self-induction. It is thus that the vibrations of a pendulum are made more rapid by diminishing its length. But it is not enough to construct the pendulum; it must be set in motion. To do this, the pendulum must be displaced from its position of equilibrium by some agency ; the cause must then be removed suddenïy, that is, in a time very short Fig. 20.— An electrical oscillator, consisting in two conductors Cx, C2, joined by a wire interrupted by a spark-gap G. The conductors are charged by an induction coil R, and discharged across the air-gap. with respect to the duration of a period ; otherwise it will not oscillate. If a pendulum be displaced from the vertical by the hand, for example; then, if, instead of letting go suddenly, the arm be relaxed slowly without releasing the pendulum, the latter will reach its position of equilibrium without velocity and will not swing beyond it. Thus the time occupied in the release must be very sho*f with respect to the period of oscillation ; hence, with periods of a hundred-millionth of a second, no System of mechanical releaâe could operate, however rapid it may appear with respect to our ordinary units of ,time. Hertz solved the problem as follows : Returning to our electric pendulum (see page 24), let usHERTZ’S OSCILLATOR. 33 eut the wire which joins the two conductors, leaving a gap of several millimeters. This air-gap' divides our apparatus into two symmetrical halves which we shall connect to the two terminais of a ïtuhmkorff coil. (Fig. 20.) The secondary current will charge our two conductors, and their différence of potential will increase comparatively slowly. At first the air-gap will prevent the conductors from dis- •charging; the air acting as an insulator and keeping our pendulum displaced from its position of equilibrium. But when the différence of potential reaches a certain point the spark of the coil will leap across the gap and open a path for the electricity accumulated on the conductors. The air-gap ■ceases suddenly to be an insulator, and, by a sort of electrical trigger, our pendulum is released from the cause which pre- vented it from returning to equilibrium. If certain rather eomplex conditions, thoroughly studied by Hertz, are ful- fflled, the release will be sudden enough to produce oscilla- tions. 3. Different Forms of Oscillators.— Thus, the essential parts of an oscillator are : lst. Two terminal conductors, of relatively large capacity, which receive from the induction coil initial charges of op- posite sign, and which exchange their charges at each half oscillation. 2d. An intermediate conducting wire joining these con- ductors, through which the electricity flows from one to the c .ner. 3d. A spark micrometer, placed in the middle of the inter- mediate conductor. This is the sent of a résistance which permits the displacing of the electric pendulum from its posi- tion pf equilibrium: this résistance afterward disappears suddenly when the discharge takes place, thus releasing the pendulum. 334 MAXWELL’S THEORY. 4th. An induction coil, whose tenninals are connected to the two halves of the oscillator, and which furnishes their initial charges. This is, so to speak, the arm which displaces the pendulum from its position of equilibrium. In Hertz's first oscillator (Fig. 21), the two terminal con- ductors were spheres of fifteen centimeters radius, and the intermediate conductor a straight wire 150 centimeters long. Hertz also used square plates instead of the two spheres. (Fig. 22.) Fig. 22.—Hertzs oscillator with flat plates instead of the spherical conductors. Bending the intermediate conductor into the form of a rectangle and bringing the two plates close together so as to form a condenser, we hâve the oscillator of M. Blondlot (Fig. 23), which he generally used as a resonator. By simply replacing the plate condenser by a Leyden jar,HERTZ’8 OSCILLATOR. 35 and lengthening the intermediate wire, we hâve the apparatus of Feddersen, whose vibrations are so slow that the release may be made mechanically. Suppressing the intermediate conductor, we hâve Lodge’s oscil- lator reduced to two spheres between which the discharge takes place ; but instead of two spheres, Lodge ordinarily used three or four. (Figs. 24 and 25.) We shall see this apparatus again, much reduced in size, in the experiments of Eighi and Bose, in Chapter X. Suppressing the terminal conductors, and reducing the length of the intermediate wire to thirty centimeters, we hâve Hertz3s small oscillator. (Fig. 26.) The charge, instead of being concentrated at the extremities, is distributed over the en tire length of the wire. 4. Function of the Spark.— We hâve seen how important it is that the spark be “ good,” that is, that it shall leap sud- denly, in a time very short with respect to the period of oscil- S* Fig. 23.— Blondlot’s oscilla- tor. The two fiat conductors (Fig. 22), are brought into close proximity, so that they constitute a condenser of com- paratively large capacity. Figs. 24 and 25.— Two forms of Lodge’s oscillator. In the former the oscillations play across between the two middle spheres; in the latter, they surge, like tidal waves, over the surface of the large sphere. lation. Many circumstances influence the quality of the spark. In the first. place, it must pass between two knobs ; it would be bad if it passed between two points, or a knob and a point*36 MAXWELL 'S THEOKY. Again, the surfaces of the knobs must be well polished. In air they oxidize rapidly and must be frequently cleaned. Finally, the knobs must be separated by the proper dis- tance; indeed, it is this which limits the amplitude of the oscillations. In order to give strong oscillations, our pendu- lum must be displaced considerably from its position of equilibrium; that is, the two halves of the oscillator must receive con- sidérable charges before the spark occurs. Now, the discharge will take place when the différence of potential reaches a cer- tain value, depending upon the length of the air-gap; hence, we would naturally be led to increase this distance ; but if this is done, the spark ceases to be good. After a little practice, it is easy to distin- guish good from bad sparks by their appearance and sound. 5. Influence of Light.— Hertz observed another curious effect,— the primary and secondary sparks seemed to act mysteri- ously upon each other. When a screen was placed between the two, the secondary spark ceased to occur. Hertz thought at first that this was due to some elec- trical action, but he perceived later 'that the phenomenon was caused by the light of the spark. Yet a plate of glass, which allows light to pass, prevented the action of the sparks upon each other. This was because the active ravs, in this case, are the ultra-violet, which are absorbed by the glass; in fact, a plate of fluorite, which is transparent to ultra-violet rays, does not prevent the action of the primary spark. Fig. 26.— Hertz’s *mall oscillator, con- sisting in two short forass rods terminat- ing in spheres at the inner ends.HÊRTZ'8 OSCILLATOR. ST 6. The Use of Oil.— MM. Sarasin and de la Rive made a great advance, in causing the discharge to take place in oiL The knobs of the micrometer no longer become oxidized, the incessant cleanings are not necessary, and the sparks are much more regular. Moreover, the disruptive potential being greater than in air, the electrical pendulnm may be further displaced before it is released by the discharge. The ampli- tude of the oscillation is thus increased. 7. Value of the Wave-length.— Various theoretical consid- érations enable us to calculate that Hertz’s large oscillatorr described above, produces oscillations whose frequency is 50,000,000 cycles per second. We know that the wave-length of an oscillation is the dis- tance traversed by the disturbance in the time of a complété, oscillation ; hence, if the velocity of propagation is the same as that of light, that, is, 300,000 kilometers per second, the wave-length will be the fifty-millionth part of 300,000 kilo- meters, or 6 meters. In the same way we may predict that Hertz’s small oscilla- tor will give vibrations ten times as rapid, and consequently of one-tenth the wave-length. We shall see further on that these theoretical conditions, hâve been confirmed by the direct measurement of the wave- lengths.CHAPTER V. METHODS OF OBSERVATION. 1. Principle of the Resonator.—An oscillator produces in the space surrounding it displacement currents and phe- nomena of induction; or again, it produces by induction a disturbance at one point of a wire, and this disturbance is propagated along the wire. It remains to be seen how these facts may be observed. For this purpose a resonator is generally used. When a tuning fork vibrâtes, its vibrations are communicated to the surroundiug air; and, if there be in the vicinity another fork in tune with the first, this also will commence to vibrate. In the same manner, an electrical oscillator produces a disturb- ance in the surrounding medium, and causes a second oscil- lator in the vicinity to respond, if their periods of oscillation be the same. The second oscillator thus becomes a resonator. But there is a great différence between acoustic résonance and electrical résonance. An acoustic resonator responds readily to vibrations which are exactly in unison with it ; the résonance is practically nil if their periods differ, however slightly. An electrical resonator responds readily to impulses with which it is in tune, not quite so well to tliose whose period is a little different from its own, and poorly to those wdiich are notably discordant. The reason for the différence is this : Acoustic vibrations hâve a small décrément — their amplitude is nearly con- stant — while electrical vibrations are damped rapidly. This is why the electrical résonance is weaker and less marked. A resonator is simply an oscillator without the induction [38]MET H ODS OF OBSERVATION. 39 coil, which is now useless ; for the function of the coil is to charge the oscillator, while, in this case, it is the external field which excites the oscillations in the resonator. Furthermore, any form of oscillator may be used as a resonator. Ordinarily the two terminal conductors are dis- pensed with, and in most cases one or other of two forms is used : the open resonator in which the conductor is a straight wire (A D, Fig. 28), and the closed resonator, which is bent in a cir- cle with the ends of the con- ductor almost meeting. (Fig. 27.) 2f* .• » xi , uiicrumeier screw ior measur- . Opération OI tne xlesonator. ing the length of the induced . sp&rk — When a Sound is produced in an organ pipe it is reflected at one end, returns in the opposite direction, is again reflected at the other end, and so on. Ail these reflected waves interfère with each other, adding their effects if they be in accord, destroying each other when in opposition. Thus certain tones are re- inforced and others are extinguished. The operation of an electrical resonator is quite similar ; the disturbance travels along the wire, is reflected at each end, and the cumulative effect of ail these reflected waves, traveling to and fro, is to reinforce those vibrations whose period is suitable. We hâve shown above why it is necessarv to furnish an oscillator with an interrupter which releases the electrical pendulum suddenlv. The same considérations do not apply here, for it is the external field which excites the resonator. Fig. 27.— A closed resonator as used by Hertz. M is a m î nt»Am ûf AT* Cai» 40 MAXWELL9S THEORY. But it is not sufficient to hâve oscillations in the resonator, we inust be able to detect them; and the spark furnishes a con- venient means of observation. Hence we retain a spark- gap in the middle of the open resonator. With the closed resonator it suffices to bring the ends close enough together to allow the spark to pass. Thus, when the amplitude of the oscillations reaches a certain point, the différence of po- tential between the ends of the resonator may be sufficient to cause a spark to leap across the air-gap, and in this way only do we become aware of the existence of the oscilla- e-T D. 3 e-±.' A z p»* Fig. 28.— An open resonator, AD, compared to a sonorous tube, MN, closed at both ends. The current, which is analogous to the velocity of the air, is a maximum in the middle, but is zéro at the ends, as indicated by the dotted curves. The wave-length, /, is twice the length of the resonator. tions. It is as if we had a vessel containing water in mo- tion, but were unable to observe the disturbance except when it became so great as to splash part of the water out of the vessel. The second ary sparks produced in the resonator are much smaller than the primary sparks of the oscillator — they are only a few hundredths of a millimeter in length. If a tube closed at both ends contain a vibrating column of air, the half wave-length of the vibration is equal to the total length of the tube; and, by analogy, the half wave- length of the free oscillation of a resonator should be theMETHODS OF OBSERVATION. 41 total length of the wire, if its ends hâve no capacity. The ends of the conductor are thns comparable to the closed ends of the sonorous tube ; for the current must be zéro at these points, beyond which the electricity cannot pass, and where it cannot accumulate. (Fig. 28.) This ceases to be true when the capacity of the ends of the conductor is appréciable, and for this reason the half wave- length in a closed resonator is a little greater than the length of the conductor. We can now understand the operation of an open resonator. Given a wire, A D, broken in the middle by a spark-gap, B.lfC. ------------ 1-rux.l ' l'.ru». te-------1-------^1U-------è-------*! P** £ V*rW ly>na«. H. Fig. 29.— Before the spark occurs in the resonator. the two halves, though separate, affect each other across the spark-gap. The current is still maximum at the inner ends, B, C, and each half vibrâtes like a closed organ pipe, with a wave length, — 4 x AB = 4x CD = 2 x AD. E C. (Fig. 29.) This gap is very short— only a few hun- dredths of a millimeter. The end B of A B, and the end C of C D are thus, as it were, the plates of a condenser, separated by a very thin layer of dielectric, and hence of considérable capacity. Consequently, they correspond rather to the ope a end than to the closed end of a sonorous tube. If a spark passes, the whole resonator, A D, vibrâtes like a tube with both ends closed, and the half wave-length is A D. If the spark does not pass, the two halves, A B and C D, of the resonator vibrate separately, but after the man-42 MAXWELL’tf THEOKÏ. ner of a tube with one end closed and the other open. The half wave-length is thus twice A B, that is, equal to A D, as before. 3. Other Methods of TJsing the Spark.— The use of a re- sonator, which distorts the wave by exaggerating certain harmonies, may be avoided as follows : Suppose the disturbance to be propagated along a wire, two points of which are brought close together. (Fig. 30.) The Fig. 30.— A method of investigating wave forms. A current from the oscillator travels along the wire ABCD, a loop of which is bridged by a spark-gap, BD. Owing to the finite velocity of propagation there will be a différence of potential between B and D, of which the spark-length is a measure. wave will reach one of these points before the other, hencc there will be a différence of potential between them ; and if this différence be sufficiently great, a spark will leap across. This method was used by MM. Pérot and Birkeland, who, by varying the length of conductor comprised between the two sides of the spark-gap, obtained sufficient data for determin- ing the form of the wave. Whether a resonator be used or not, it is évident- that the spark furnishes a means of measurement. The distance be- tween the knobs of the spark-gap may be varied by means of a micrometer screw, and the distance over which the spark will leap thus determined. (Fig. 31.)METHODS OF OBSERVATION. 43 The phenomenon becomes much more brilliant if a Geissler tube be used; indeed a tube containing rarified gas is illu- minated when it is simply placed in the alternating field produced by an oscillator. 4. Thermal Methods.— Instead of observing the sparks we may study the heating efïect of the oscillating currents, either in a resonator or in the wire along which the wave is propagated. For measuring the heating of conductors three methods are available: First. Measuring the élongation of the conductor; Second. Measuring the variation of résistance ; Third. The use of thermo-electric couples. (1.) The measurement of élongation is not accurate, not- withstanding the ingenious devices that hâve been used; hence we shall not consider this method, nor the experiments based on the motion of heated air in a tube surrounding the conductor. (2.) Measuring the change of résistance gives better re- sults. The bolometric method is used: an ordinary Wheat- stone bridge has ail of its branches traversed by the current of a battery, and in addition, the oscillating current is sent through one of them. (Fig. 32.) Suppose the galvanometer to stand at zéro, and then pass the oscillations through one arm of the bridge : this arm is heated, its résistance increases, the equilibrium is destroyed, and the galvanometer is deflected. (3.) The oscillating current is caused to traverse a fine wire, near which (about one-tentli millimeter away) is placed a thermo-pile. This method is very délicate. Fig. 31.— A spark micrometer as used' by Hertz in connection with the resonator shown in Fig. 27.44 MAXWELL98 THEORY. 5. Mechanical Methods.— Mechanical methods, whether founded on electrostatic attractions or on the mutual action of currents, seem at first sight incapable of detecting Hertz- ian oscillations. These oscillations are so rapid that no mechanical device can follow ail the variations of the electri- cal or magnetic phenomena ; ail that can be obtained is a mean vaine of the phenomenon. But a galvanometer, for in- stance, receiving a sériés of al- ternate impulses in opposite di- rections, would remain at rest; the mean value of the phenome- non would be zéro. Again, if the quadrants of an electrometer be connected to the apparatus producing the oscillations and the needle charged to a constant potential, the électrification of the quad- rants will be continually changing sign while that of the needle is constant; their mutual action will be continually reversed, and its mean value will be zéro. In order to obtain a deflection, Herr Bjerknes used an- other arrangement. He employed a quadrant electrometer with ail but two opposite quadrants removed. These were connected respectively to the two terminais of a resonator so arranged as to give no sparks. The needle of the electrom- eter was insulated. At a given moment the needle is charged inductively with positive electricity at one end, and with négative at the other, and the quadrants exert a certain action upon it. A half-period later the charges of the quadrants hâve changed Fig. 32.— Bolometric method of measuring oscillations. The fine wire MN carrying the current to jbe measured is inserted in the arm AB, and the bridge balanced. Any heating due to the oscillations in MN will cause a deflection.METHODS OF OBSERVATION. 45 sign, but the induced électrification of the needle is also re- versed, so that the direction of the action is not changed. 6. Comparison of the Different Methods.— There is an im- portant différence between the methods founded on the spark and the thermal or mechanical methods. The spark simply occurs, or does not occur; and in order that it may occur, it suffices that the potential be sufficiently high at any instant ivhatever to break down the air-gap. Hence it tells us only the maximum amplitude of the oscilla- tion. The thermal and mechanical methods, on the other hand, give us intégral values : they indicate a mean* amplitude de- pending upon the values of ail the oscillations. Herr Bjerknes, by employing both methods simultaneously, succeeded in measuring the damping of the free oscillations of a resonator. It is clear that, the greater the décrément of an oscillation, the smaller is the ratio of the mean ampli- tude to the maximum : thus, by comparing the results of the two methods of measurement, we may détermine this ratio. 7. Coherers.— Branly devised a detector which is much more sensitive than any of the foregoing. It is based on an entirely different principle, and is known as the “ coherer ” or “ radio-conductor.”f Imagine a glass tube of rather small bore filled with metallic filings. Each of the metallic particles is, in it- * The word (moyenne) in the original does not convey the strict idea of “ average ” or “ arithmetical mean,” for it isthe mean square that is gener- ally indicated in such measurements.—F. K. V. f The name radio-conductor,” given to this apparatus by Branly, implies nothing regarding the nature of the phenomenon involved, but simply that the tube becomes a conductor under the influence of the radia- tions. The name “ coherer,” introduced by Lodge, though assuming more definite knowledge on the disputed question, is more generallv used.— F. K. V.46 MAXWELL’S THEORY. self, a good conductor, but the electricity encounters a con- sidérable résistance in passing from one to the other, so that almost the cntire résistance of the apparatus is seated in the points of contact between the particles. Now, experiment shows that the résistance is greatly di- minished when the apparatus is exposed to Hertzian radia- tions — that is, to the induc- tive forces which proceed from a Hertzian oscillator, and which change sign a great number of times per second. We shall not attempt to ex- plain this phenomenon*: suf- fice it. to say that similar effects hâve been observed on exposing a coherer, not to Hertzian radiations, but to other influences of an entirely different nature, though periodic in character and of very short period, such as certain sound waves. Whatever the explanation, the Hertzian radiations act as if they produced a more intimate contact between the me- tallic particles. A jar or an élévation of température re- stores the coherer to its original condition of high résistance. Suppose now a coherer to be connected in circuit with a bat- tery and exposed to the radiations produced by an oscillator. (Fig. 33.) When the oscillator is not working, the coherer is traversed onlv by the continuons current of the battery. If, now, the oscillator be put in operation, the coherer will be traversed also by rapidly alternat ing current s produced Fig. 33.— Early form of filings coherer, C, with galvanometer G and battery B. * For the results of recent experiments, see pages 179-185.METHODS OF OBSERVATION, 47 by induction from the oscillator; but, in this case, as the alternating currents diminish the résistance, the continuons current is greatly increased, and a galvanometer in the cir- cuit will show a marked deflection. Branly’s detector may be compared to the bolometer de- scribed above: in each apparatus the oscillations hâve the effect of changing the résistance of a conductor traversed by a continuons current, but the variation is due to quite differ- ent causes: in the one case, to the heating of the wire; in the other, to a more intimate contact between the particles of métal. Moreover, the coherer is vastly more sensitive; we shall see it again in the experiments of Bose in Chapter X ; in- deed, it is this device that has made wireless telegraphy possible. The coherer has been used in the effort to détermine whether Hertzian radiations are emitted by the sun, but the results were négative. Perhaps these radiations are ab- sorbed by the solar atmosphère. Experiments show unquestionablv that gases under ordi- nary pressures are quite transparent to these radiations: but is this the case with highly rarified gases ? We hâve seen that a Geissler tube glows in the field of an oscillator. It does not give light without absorbing energy ; hence rari- fied gases absorb Hertzian radiations, and it is possible that those which the sun may émit are absorbed by the upper strata of the two atmosphères, where the pressure is very low.CHAPTER VI. PROPAGATION ALONG A W3RE. 1. Production of Waves in a Wire.—A Hertzian oscillator produces forces of induction in the field which surrounds it. If we place a long wire in this field, the forces of induction will generate alternating currents in the part of the wire rearest to the oscillator, and this electromagnetic disturbance will travel along the wire. To force the electromagnetic disturbances to follow the wire several devices may be used, among which we may mention the electro- static method of Hertz, and the electromagnetic method of M. Blondlot. Hertz's method.— The spheres of the oscillator are' replaced by two métal plates, A and B (Fig. 34), of large capacity; opposite these are placed two simi- lar ones, A' and B', and at the middle of each of the latter is attached a wire of a certain length. The capacities of the plates A and B are thus increased by causing each to form part of a condenser. Tf the oscillator be put in operation, one of the plates, say A, will be charged positively, and B negatively. At the end of a half oscillation the charges will hâve changed sign ; and so on, the polarity changing with each half-period. " [48] Fig. 34.— Hertz’s method of establish- ing waves in wires. The plates A and B of the oscillator act electrostatically uçon two similar plates, A'B', to which the wires are attached.PROPAGATION ALONG A WIRE. 49 The plates A' and B' are charged inductively witli op- posite signs to those of A and B, and the wires proceeding froin them become the seat. of an oscillatory phenomenon of the same period as that of the oscillator. M. Blondlofs method.— The oscillator takes the form of a curved wire ending in a sort of condenser. (Fig. 35.) Around this first wire is bent another, whose ends are car- ried out radially to a considérable distance. The two cir- cular conductors are insulated from each other by a cover- ing of rubber. When the oscillations are produced, the oscillator is the seat of periodic currents which excite induced cur- rents of the same period in the second conductor. 2. Mode of Propagation. — Is the propagation of a Hertzian oscillation, that is, * wire which connects the plates of the OI an alternatmg current OI oscillator is bent into a circle, and i.i/. . acts inductively upon another loop Very nign irequency, similar concentric with it, to which the wires in every respect to the prop- are attached* agation of a continuons current, such as is furnished by a battery? One striking différence was observed long ago by experi- menters: a continuons current distributes itself uniformly over the whole section of the conductor; but this is not the case, even with the low-frequency alternating currents em- ployed in the arts. In the axis of the conductor the current is very weak, while its intensity is much greater at the sur- face. It is as if the surface current shielded the interior of the conductor from external actions, by the forces of in- duction which it produces. With Hertzian oscillations, whose period is very much50 MAXWELL’S THEORY. shorter, we should expect to see the phenomenon exaggerated. There should be no current except in a very thin superficial layer. Bjerknes verified this prédiction in an ingenious manner. We hâve seen (page 45) how this scientist measured the damping of a resonator. This damping dépends upon the material of which the resonator is made: it is not the same for a resonator of iron as for one of copper. Bjerknes plated his iron resonator, by electrolysis, with a coating of copper, and the copper resonator with a coat- ing of iron. When the thickness of the coating was greater than a hundredth of a millimeter, the iron resonator acted like one of copper, and the copper resonator like one of iron. This showed that the currents are confined to a shell whose thickness is of the order of a hundredth of a milli- meter. This effect is in accord with both the old theory and that of Maxwell. But Maxwell’s theory predicts another peculiarity, which, unfortunately, hardly admits of direct experimental proof. The altemating currents which flow in a wire produce forces of induction in the surrounding air. According to Maxwell, these forces of induction should generate displace- ment currents in the air itself. Thus, with continuons currents, we hâve conduction cur- rents through the whole mass of the conductor and none at ail in the surrounding air. With high-frequency altemat- ing currents, on the other hand, there are conduction cur- rents in the superficial layer of the conductor, none in the interior, and displacement currents in the air. 3. Velocity of Propagation and Diffusion.— Kirehhoff un- dertook to compute the velocity of propagation of any elec- trical disturbance whatever. He assumed, at the start, that the conductor was perfect, and that the current, encounter-PROPAGATION ALONG A WIRE. 51 ing no ohmic résistance, woulcl only hâve to overcome the self-induction, which acts like inertia. He showed that, under these conditions, the velocity of propagation would be equal to the ratio of the units — that is, to the velocity of light—300,000 kilometers per second. Moreover the propagation is uniform : if the disturbance be confined originally to a certain part of the wire, one meter long, for example, at the end of a hundred-thousandth of a second the front of the wave will hâve advanced three kilometers, and the tailof the wave also three kilometers; so that the extent of the disturbance will not be changed, but it will still occupy just one meter of the conductor. But these theoretical conditions are never realized in actual conductors, for, besides the self-induction, there is always an ohmic résistance analogous to friction to impede the current. What happens then? The front of the wave advances always with the same velocity — that of light; but the tail of the wave travc-ls much less rapidly, so that the space occupied by the disturbance becomes greater and greater: just as a caravan is spread along the road by the lagging behind of followers. This is called the diffusion 6f the current. The diffusion becomes less noticeable as the period of the oscillations is shortened. Practically we may say that, with Hertzian waves, there is no diffusion, and that ail conductors behave as if they were perfect. Not that their ohmic résist- ance is less, for it is actually greater, as the current utilizes only the thin outer shell of the conductor ; but the effect of the self-induction, which dépends upon the variations of the current, increases much faster when these variations are ex- tremely rapid, and thus the ohmic résistance becomes negli- gible with respect to the self-induction. These are the effects for which the old theory and that of52 MAXWELL>S THEORY. Maxwell both provide,— they are agreed on this point. We shall now see that these prédictions are confirmed by experi- ment. 4. Experiments of MM. Fizeau and Gounelle.— Fizeau and Gounelle’s experiments were made in 1850, with an ap- paratns based on the same principle as the celebrated method of Fizeau for measuring the velocitv of light. A dise of wood, having its circumference divided into thirty-six sectors of alternating wood and platinum, is caused to rotate with great rapidity. (Fig. 36.) Twto wires, each differential galvanometer. terminating in a metallic brush which bears upon the circum- ference of the dise, may thus be alternately connected and insulated from each other, as the dise rotâtes. There were three such pairs of brushes, B and C, E and F, and E' and F', so arranged that the connections between B C and E F were opened and closed at the same time, while the connec^ tion E' F' was closed when the other two were open, and vice versa. A battery was connected with one terminal to the ground and the other to a wire A B, attached to the brush B. APROPAGATION ALONG A WIRE. 53 long line wire, ODE E', ran from brush C to the end of the line D, and retumed to the brushes E and E'. Finally, two wires F G and F' G' connected the brushes F and F' to the ground. Let us now see what would take place if the electricity were propagated with a perfectly definite velocity, like light or Sound. We shall dénoté as a “ period ” the time which elapses from the moment one of the brushes cornes in con- tact with a sector until the contact ceases — that is, the thirty-sixth part of the time of one rotation of the dise. This period will decrease as the speed of rotation increases. Suppose the time T, required for an impulse to travel the length of the line C D E, to be equal to an even number of periods. The electricity coming from the battery will pass from B to O at the moment the connection B C is closed, will traverse the line, and arrive at E and E' at the end of time T. At this moment the connection E F will be closed and E' F' open, so the current will pass through the wire F G. If, on the other hand, T be equal to an odd number of periods, the current, on reaching E and E' will find E F open and E' F' closed, and the current will pass through the wire F' G'. Thus the speed of rotation could be adjusted so that the whole current would pass through F G, or through F' G' ; or, for intermediate velocities, the current would be divided in different proportions between the two wTires. The wires F G and F' G' included respectively the two coils of a differential galvanometer, on whose needle they acted in opposite senses; so that the deflection of the gal- vanometer indicated the comparative strength of the inter- mittent currents in the two wires. The experimenters were thus enabled to détermine what velocity of rotation was54 MAXWELL’8 THEORY. necessary to make T equal to a given multiple of the period, and hence to measure T, winch gave them the velocity of propagation. Yarious circumstances, to which we shall refer later, arose to coinplicate the phenomena, and it was found that the cur- rent in F G (or F' G'), could never be reduced to zéro, but showed only a succession of maxima and minima, of which the former alone could be determined. The observations of Fizeau and Gounelle gave 100,000 kilometers per second for the velocity in iron, and 180,000 kilpmeters per second for copper. 5. Diffusion of Currents.— It has been noted that the current could never be reduced to zéro, as would be the case if the impulse traveled with a perfectly definite velocity. It appears rather that the wave spreads out as it travels, so as to occupy more space on the wire when it arrives than it did at the start. This phenomenon, which the experiments of Fizeau established beyond a doubt, was called by him the “ diffusion ” of the current. We hâve seen above (page 51), the ground on which this phenomenon might hâve been predicted. The consé- quences follow readily. The wave must travel as if a part of the electricity moved wûth the velocity of light, while the rest followed at a lesser, and variable, velocity. The resuit would be, as it were, a column with a strong front, advancing at a velocity of 300,000. kilometers per second, but leaving behind laggards straggling along the road. The method of Fizeau measured, not the maximum veloc- ity — that of the head of the column — but the mean veloc- ity, which should be much smaller. This explains why his results are so far below 300,000 kilometers. The mean velocity in iron is less than in copper, for two reasons:PROPAGATION ALONG A WIKE. 55 First, because iron is magnetic, and the self-induction is increased by reason of tbe transverse magnetization of the wire ; second, because the spécifie résistance of iron is greater than that of copper, and hence the diffusion is greater. Fizeau’s experiments are thus not in conflict with the theory. 6. Experiments of M. Blondlot.—The above discussion indicates how different is the propagation of a continuons current, or of an intermittent or alternating current of low frequency, from the propagation of Hertzian waves. These last are of very short duration and consist in oscil- lations of extremely high frequency. We may well surmise that the effect of diffusion is negligible, the residue lagging behind very small, and the mean velocity of propagation ex- tremely close to that of the wave-front, that is, 300,000 kilo- meters per second. But the experiments just described did not justify any conclusions regarding waves of this kind. Further researches were necessarv, and thus M. Blondlot was led to undertake the following experiments: His apparatus comprises two symmetrical Leyden jars, F and F', of small capacity. (Fig. 37.) The interior coatings, A and A' are joined by a wire, broken in the middle by a spark micrometer. The two knobs of the micrometer are con- nected to a Ruhmkorff coil. The coatings A and A' of the Leyden jar, the conductor which joins them, and the spark micrometer constitute an oscillator, which we shall call E. The outer coating of each of the jars F and F' is divided into two insulated sections. We shall dénoté as B and C the two sections of the outer coating of F, and B' and C' those of the outer coating of F'. B and B' are connected in two manners: First. By a moistened cord;56 MAXWELL’S THEORY. Second. By a short wire, containing a spark micrometer at its niicldle point. The terminais of the spark-gap are two met allie points, P and P'. Similarly O and C' are connected in two ways: First. By a moistened cord; Second. By a line wire. This wire runs from C to a point D at the end of the line, then retums to the point P, men- tioned above ; after traversing the micrometer, the electricity Fig. 37.— Blondlot’s method of measuring the velocity of high fre- quency waves in wires. A and A' represent the inner coatings of two Leyden jars, connected together through a spark-gap, and constituting an oscillator, E. BC and B'C' are the outer coatings, each divided into two sections. CDP and C'D'P' are the line wires, and PP' two points be- tween which leaps the secondary spark, which is observed in a rotating mirror. The dotted lines represent wet cords. must pass from P' to a point D', at the end of the line, re- turning then to the coating C' of the jar F\ The pôles of the line thus support four wires, O D, D P, P' iy? D' C' ; and the electricity, in passing from O to C' by this route, passing through the micrometer, must traverse the length of the line four times: twice in going, twice in returning. Thus there are two routes from B to B' or from C to C' ; the one through a wet cord of high résistance, the other through a metallic circuit, interrupted by a spark-gap.PROPAGATION ALONG A WIRE. 57 If the variations of potential are slow, the current will pass entirely by the moist cord; for the différence of po- tential between the points P and P' will not be great enough to cause a spark to leap, and the micrometer will remain an insulator. If, on the other hand, the variations of potential are rapid, a spark will leap, opening a path for the electricity across ^the micrometer: almost the entire current will pass by the metallic circuit, while the cord will carry only a negligible amount, owing to its high résistance. The apparatus opérâtes as follows: The Ruhmkorff coil charges the inner coatings, A and A', of the jars; say A positively and A' negatively. The coat- ings B and C are charged negatively by induction ; the coat- ings B' and C', positively. Hence a quantity of electricity must flow from B to B' and from C to C' ; but, as the varia- tions of potential are comparatively slow, it will flow through the moist cords. At a certain moment a spark will pass in the oscillator E. This discharge is oscillatory, as its appearance plainly shows. The coatings A and A' are discharged suddenly, and the charges accumulated on B and C, B' and C', are sud- denly and simultaneously liberated. Currents will thus flow baek from B' to B and from C' to C, but this time following the metallic circuit, for their variations are sudden. Two sparks will pass in the micrometer P P', which is the common part of the metallic circuits B B' and C C'. The first spark will pass at the moment the disturbance starting from B arrives at P ; the second, when the disturbance start- ing from C arrives at P. As the path B C is very short, the interval of time elapsing between the two sparks will be the time required by the disturbance to traverse the path CDP. This length, CDP, we shall call the length of the line. It5S MAXWELL'S THEORY. is double the length of the wire C D, which runs to the end of the line, and half the total length of the circuit CDPP' D' C'. The time interval between the two sparks was determined by means of a rotating mirror which threw the light of the sparks upon a sensitive plate, and the distance between the two images on the plate was measured. The first experiments, in which the length of line was a little over one kilometer, showed, on an average, a velocity of 293,000 kilometers per second ; later, with a length of line of 1,800 meters, an average velocity of 298,000 kilometers was obtained.CHAPTEK VIL MEASTTREMENT OF WAVE-LENGTH AED MULTIPLE RESONANCE. 1. Stationary Waves.— The experiments above described show that the velocity of propagation along a wire is the same as that of light. To détermine the number of vibra- tions per second it remains to measure the length of wave, and to divide by this length the distance traversed in a sec- ond, i. e., 300,000 kilometers. To this end, Hertz undertook to ntilize the phenomenon of stationary waves. Suppose a periodic disturbance to travel along a wire: when it reaches the end of the wire it will be reflected and will return in the opposite direction. The resulting dis- turbance may be obtained by combining the direct and re- flected waves. Two periodic waves are added together when they are of the same phase; that is, when the alternating currents which accompany them are both positive or both négative at the same time : they annul each other when they are of opposite phases ; that is, when the currents accompany- ing one are positive while ihose of the other are négative, and vice versa. The two waves, direct and reflected, are of the same phase and are added if the différence between the distances which they hâve traveled is an intégral number of wave-lengths* ; * The author evidently had in mind the case where the wave is reflected from a capacity (Fig. 38): when the reflection occurs at the free end of a wire, the positions of nodes and loops are interchanged. (Fig. 39.) See below.—F. K. V. [59]60 MAXWELL’S THEORY. the corresponding points of the wire, where the action is a maximum, are called “ loops,” or “ antinodes.” The two waves are opposite in phase, and mutually de- structive, when the différence between the distances trav- eled is an odd number of half wave-lengths : the correspond- ing points of the wire, where the action is nil, are called “ nodes.” The distance between two consecutive nodes is equal to a half wave-length. Let A and B be two such nodes. (Fig. 38.) At A, the dif- férence between the distances traveled by the two waves is (B- le- Fig. 38.— Formation of stationary waves in wires terminating in a large capacity. N, N are nodes, where the current is zéro, and L, L are loops, where the current reaches a maximum. The ordinates of the dotted curves indicate relative values of the eurrent. AB = -^ = half wave- length. 2 equal to an odd number of half wave-lengths, say 2n+l. The direct wave passes A before reaching B; the reflected wave passes B before reaching A. When we move from A to B the distance traversed by the direct wave is increased by the length A B, while the distance traversed by the reflected wave is diminished by A B. Thus the différence between the dis- tances traveled is diminished hy 2 x A B. Now, as the point B is a node, this différence also must be an odd num- ber of half wave-lengths, 2n — 1. Thus 2 x A B must be precisely equal to a wave-length. Such is the phenomenon of stationary waves as it was atWAVE-LENGTH AND MULTIPLE RESONANCE. G1 first understood by Hertz, who lioped to find in it a simple method of measuring wàvedengths. Unfortunately, as we shall now see, the matter is some- what more complicated. Eeflection at the end of a wire may take place in differ- ent ways. If the wire simply terminâtes abruptly, without capacity, the electricity cannot accumnlate at the end, and the current at that point must be zéro. The end of the wdre is a node. (Fig. 39.) If, on the other hand, the wire terminâtes in a considér- able capacity — for example, if the two parallel wires shown (IIH te- Fig. 39.— Formation of stationary waves in wires which terminate abruptly. The positions of nodes and loops are reversed with reference to those of Fig. 38. on pages 48 and 49, be connected to the two plates of a condenser — then the end is a loop. (Fig. 38.) Again, the ends of these two parallel wires may be joined. A wave which has traversed one of the wires in the positive sense returns by the other in the négative sense, and, inter- fering with the positive wave following the second wire, produces stationary waves. 2. Multiple Résonance.—We hâve seen (page 38) that a resonator responds readily to an oscillator with which it is perfectly in tune, but that it also responds, though less readily, to an oscillator of different period. Consequentlv, it is possible to work with an oscillator62 MAXWELL’S THEORY. and a reson ator wliose periods differ considerably. This was done by MM. Sarasin and de la Eive. They discovered an unexpected law, which they called the “ law of multiple résonance.” The internode, or distance between two nodes, which, according to the preceding para- graphe should be the measure of the half wave-length, changes when different reson ators are used with the same oscillator, but remains the same when the oscillator is changed while using the same resonator. Hence, that which is measured must be something pertaining to the resonator itself; in fact, the internode is the half wave-length of the free oscilla- tions of the resonator — not of those produced by the oscil- lator. The following is the explanation offered by MM. Sarasin and de la Rive: The wave produced by the oscillator is complex, and results from the superposition of an infinity of simple vibrations, which may be called its components. Such is the radiation of a luminous body which produces, not monochromatic light, but white light, giving a continuous spectrum. Each resonator responds to only one of these components, and when a resonator is used to measure a wave-length, it is the wave-length of this component which is obtained: the other components hâve no effect on the resuit. In other words, we measure the wave-length of the free oscillation of the resonator. In like manner in acoustics, a complex sound made up of several harmonies may be analyzed by a resonator which suppresses ail but one of these harmonies. 3. Aniother Explanation—The phenomenon may be ex- plained in a different manner. The vibrations produced by an oscillator decay very rapidly; the energy of theWAVE-LENGTH AND MULTIPLE RESONANCE. 63 oscillation is quickly transformée! into heat by the résistance of the spark-gap, or dissipated by radiation into space. What is the resuit? We hâve shown above how the re- flected wave is added to or subtracted from the direct wave, and that it is this composition of the two impulses which produces stationary waves. But consider a point, A, at some distance from the end of the wire. (Fig. 40.) A considérable time is required for the impulse to travel from A to the end of the wire and retum after reflection to A; and during this time, the damping of the direct wave may hâve completely ex- tinguished it. Thus, on the arrivai of the reflected wave Fig. 40.— A strongly damped wave-train about to be reflected from the free end B of a wire. Interférence between the direct and reflected waves can occur only within the space BC, equal to half the length of the wave- train. at A there is no direct watve for it to combine with, and hence no stationary waves can be formed. Thus we feee that there are no stationary waves, properly speaking, except near the end of the wire. Yet, by using a resonator we may observe a succession of nodes and loops throughout the whole length of the wire. How can this be ? The Paradox is readily explained on the assumption that the vibrations of the oscillator are damped much more rapidly than those of the resonator. Wlien the direct wave passes it sets the resonator in vibration ; when the reflected wrave returns, the direct wave has been extinguished in the wire, but the resonator has not ceased to vibrate. It receives a64 MAXWELL’S THEORY. second impulse from the reflected wave. Will this impulse increase the amplitude of its oscillations or diminish them ? Consider an analogy. A pendulum receives a first impulse which causes it to move, say from left to right. After a half oscillation it will be moving from right to left ; after a complété oscillation it will again be moving from left to right. In general, after a whole number of oscillations it will move from left to right ; after an odd number of half oscillations, it will move from right to left. Suppose it to receive a second impulse in the same sense as the first. If this impulse be given after a whole number of oscillations, when the pendulum is moving from left to right, it will tend to increase the velocity; if the impulse corne after an odd number of half oscillations, when the pendulum is moving from right to left, it will tend to diminish it. So with the resonator: this apparatus receives a first im- pulse on the passage of the direct wave; a second, on the passage of the reflected wave. If, between these two im- pulses, the resonator perform a whole number of oscillations — that is, if the différence between the distances traveled by the two waves be equal to a whole number of wave-lengths of the resonator — the effects of the two impulses will be cu- mulative, and a loop will be observed. If, on the other hand, the différence between the distances traveled be equal to an odd number of half wave-lengths of the resonator, the effects of the two impulses will annul each other, and a node will be observed. Thus, the distance between two nodes should be equal to the half wave-length of the resonator; the wave-length of the oscillator does not enter the resuit. A few remarks in passing regarding this second ex- plan a tion :WAVE-LENGTH AND MULTIPLE RESONANCE. 65 We hâve seen what occurs when the two impulses received by a pendulum are in the sanie sense: the effect is reversed when they are in opposite senses. Kow, it is évident that the impulse due to the direct wave and that due to the re- flected wave may be in the same sense or in opposite senses, according to the manner in which the reflection is produced (see page 61) and according to the position of the resonator. Ilence we hâve an exceedingly simple explanation of the ex- periments of M. Turpain, which hâve seemed paradoxical to some persons, but which are sufficiently accounted for by symmetry. In the second place, we may ask why an apparatus con- si sting in two long wires is not équivalent to a large resonator, but responds indifferently to excitations of ail periods. If it were not for damping, the reflected waves, interfering as has been explained on page 39, would produce résonance effects. But this is not the case : when one of the reflected waves reaches a given point of the wire, the direct wave has long been extinguished, and there is no interférence. 4. Experiments of Garbasso and Zehnder.— Between the two explanations proposed above, experiment alone can décidé. Zehnder attempted to observe directly the continuons spec- trum postulated in the theory of MM. Sarasin and de la Rive. He employed a sort of grating which should separate the different components of a complex wave emitted by the oscil- lator, just as the ordinary grating used in optics séparâtes the different colors which constitute white light. Garbasso endeavored, by means of a complicated appa- ratus which we cannot describe here, to imitate the dispersion produced by a prism when acting on white light. These experimenters obtained the results which they ex- pected, thus apparently confirming the explanation of Sarasin and de la Rive. 560 MAXWELL'S THEORY. The experiments seem conclusive, but they are not. In- deed, it may be sbown by a simple calculation that a damped vibration bas the characteristics of a complex vibration giving a continuons spectrum in which the intensities are distributed according to a particular law. Hence it is not sufficient to prove that the vibration emitted by an oscillator behaves as if it had a continuons spectrum ; Fig. 41.— A strongly damped oscillation, such as is produced by a dumb-bell oscillator. The logarithmic décrément = .26. it must also be shown that, in this spectrum, the intensities of the various components do not vary according to that par- ticular law. 5. Measurement of the Décrément.— Quite on the contrary, a sériés of experiments which we shall now consider hâve shown, not only that the intensities do vary according to this. law, but that the second explanation is the true one.WAVE-LENGTH AND MULTIPLE RESONANCE. 67 It was first necessary to prove the fondamental hypothesis on whieh this second explanation rests — to be certain that the damping of the oseillator is much more rapid than that of the resonator. We hâve seen (page 45) how Herr Bjerknes measured the décrément of a resonator. Fig. 42.— A feebly damped oscillation, such as that of a resonator with a logarithmic décrément of .034. The waves which excited the resonator are here supposed to hâve subsided, and the oscillations are undergoing tbeir normal decay. For an oseillator he fonnd a “ logarithmic décrément of 0.26, while he obtained, for two resonators, 0.002 and 0.034. * The term “ logarithmic décrément,” as used by Bjerknes, dénotés the natural logarithm of the ratio of two adjacent maxima — separated by a complété period. This differs from the ordinary définition of Kohlrausch and others, which involves the ratio of two consecutive tum- ing points — sbparated by a half period — and which gives values of the logarithmic décrément half as great as the above.— F. K. V.68 MAXWELL'8 THEORY. Tliat is to say, to reduce the amplitude of the oscillations to one-tenth of its initial value, nine oscillations were suffi- cient in the case of the oscillator, while the two resonators re- quired, respectively, more than 60 and more than 1,000. (See Figs. 41 and 42.) ïhus the vibration of an oscillator is damped much more rapidly than that of a resonator. 6. Experiments of Strindberg.— To complété the proof it was necessary to show that if, by any artifice, the damping of the resonator could be made greater than that of the oscillator, the phenomena would be reversed ; that is, the internode would dépend no longer upon the resonator, but on the oscillator. This was done independently by M. Décombe in France, and M. Nils Strindberg in Sweden. I cannot write this name without reminding the reader that M. Strindberg, not content with serving science by his intelli- gence, would also contribute his courage. Ile accompanied M. Andrée on his perilous æronautic journey in the polar régions. To accomplish the desired resuit it was necessary to di- minish the damping of the oscillator and increase that of the resonator. To diminish the décrément of the oscillator it was first necessary to stop the loss of energy in the spark. This seems at first impracticable, for, without an interrupter, the release of the “ electric pendulum ” is impossible and its oscillations cannot be started. But M. Strindberg met the difficulté by a simple artifice. A primary oscillator was pro- vided with a spark-gap. It acted by induction upon a second- arv oscillator which was entirely similar to the first, but, being set in vibration by the action of the primary, did not require an interrupter. This secondary oscillator had theWAVE-LEXGTH AXD MULTIPLE RESONANCE. m same period as the primary, but a smaller décrément, and it was used to produce the disturbance in the wires by means of the arrangement of M. Blondlot. (See page 49, Fig. 35.) Again, it was easy to increase the résistance of the reso- nator; and, as the résistance is a sort of friction, this had the cffect of increasing the damping of the oscillations. 7. Experiments of Pérot and Jones — There are other more direct methods of proof. We liave seen that, notwithstanding the damping, true stationary waves are formed ; but only near the end of the wire. The study of these stationary wave9 enables us to détermine the form of the disturbance produced by the oscillator. But this study, to be successful, must be carried on without the aid of a resonator; for we hâve seen that resonators produce secondary effects which persist far from the end of the wire, and are then interpreted as the phenomenon of “ multiple résonance.” These disturbing effects must be suppressed. The various methods described on pages 42-44, which are independent of the resonator, hâve been used to this end. M. Pérot used the spark without a resonator. Mr. Jones employed a thermal method, based on the use of a thermo-pile. Herr Bjerknes used a mechanical method. Ail these experiments confirmed the second explanation. 8. Experiments of Décombe.— Even these methods did not seem suflSciently direct to M. Décombe. He wished to study the disturbance at the moment it was produced by the oscillator; indeed, we may well inquire if the oscillation is not changed in passing from the oscillator to the wires, or in traveling along the wires. To this end M. Décombe undertook to photograph the spark of the oscillator by means of a rotating mirror. This had been done by Feddersen (cf. Chapter III), but with oscilla-70 MAXWELL’S THEORY. tions of much lower frequency. With Hertzian oscillations the difficulties were much greater; indeed, they would hâve been insurmountable with the apparatus used by Hertz him- self (50,000,000 vibrations per second). M. Décombe had to be content with an oscillator giving 5,000,000 vibrations, whereas the apparatus of Feddersen gave only 20,000 to 400,000. The different sparks which correspond to the successive oscillations produce, on the sensitive plate, an image con- sisting in separate points, because of the motion of the mirror. The motion must be sufficiently rapid to keep these points distinct and separate from one another. M. Décombe’s mirror made 500 révolutions per second. In order that the plate might receive an impression, not- withstanding the extreme brevity of the exposure, M. Décombe found it necessary to carry to the extreme every means at his disposai, and to put ail the chances in his favor. He had to use an oscillator with a small décrément, to pro- duce the spark under oil, where it is smaller and more bril- liant, and to use a particularly energetic developing solution. The optical apparatus was so arranged that the luminous spots would be very small and very intense. Ail the details of tins experiment reflect the greatest crédit upon their author. Success rewarded his efforts, and he ob- tained images whose study reveals the existence of a simple damped oscillation, in conformity with the second explana- tion. The oscillator, it is true, is not that of Hertz, and its oscilla- tions hâve only one-tenth the frequency of his, but the différ- ence is sufficiently small to justify us in reasoning from one to the other.CHAPTER VIII. PROPAGATION IN AIR. 1. The Experimentum Crucis.—Ail the experiments which we hâve thus far considered are incapable of deciding between the old theory and that of Maxwell. Both théories agréé that electrical disturbances should be propagated along a conducting wire with a velocity equal to that of light. Both take account of the oscillatory character of the discharge of a Leyden jar, and consequently of the os- cillations produced by a Hertzian oscillator. Both assert that these oscillations should produce electro-motive forces of in- duction in the surrounding medium, and hence should excite a resonator placed in the vicinity. But according to the old theory, the propagation of in- ductive effects should be instantaneous. If, indeed, there be no displacement currents, and consequently nothing, electri- cally speaking, in the dielectric which séparâtes the inducing circuit from that in which the effects are induced, it must be admitted that the induced effect in the secondary circuit takes place at the same instant as the inducing cause in the primary; otherwise in the interval, if there were one, the cause wrould hâve ceased in the primary circuit, while the effect is not yet produced in the secondary; and, as there is nothing in the dielectric which séparâtes the two circuits, there is nothing anywhere. Thus the instantaneous propaga- tion of induction is a conclusion which the old theory cannot escape. According to Maxwell's theory, induction should be propa- gated in air with the same velocity as in a wire; that is, with the velocity of light. [71]MAXWELL’,8f THEORY. Here, then, is the experimentum crucis : we must détermine with what velocity electromagnetic disturbances are propa- gated by induction through the air. If this velocity be in- finité, we must adhéré to the old theory ; if it be equal to the velocity of light, we must accept the theory of Maxwell. IIow, then, can this velocity be measured? We cannot measure it directly ; but we hâve seen that the wave-length is, by définition, the distance traveled in the time of one vibra- Fig. 43.— Hertz’s apparatus for observing stationary waves in air. O is the oscillator, M a plane mirror of zinc fastened against a stone wall, and R a closed resonator. When the resonator is moved from the mirror towards the oscillator the spark-length varies in the manner indicated by the curve. Only two nodes, A and C, are observed, owing to the damping of the waves. As the mirror is not a perfect conductor, the node A is apparently behind the surface. The figure is drawn approximately to scale. tion; and we hâve also seen how the wave-length in a wire may be measured. If the wave-length in air is the same as that in a wire, then the velocity of propagation in air is the same as the velocity a long a wire, and the theory of Maxwell is true. The problem is thus reduced to the measurement of the wave-length in air. In making this measurement the same method may be used as in the case of propagation along a wire. We hâve seen that the direct wave transmitted along the wire was caused to interfère with the wave reflected at the end of the wire. In like manner, the direct wave transmitted through the air may be made to interfère with the wave re-PROPAGATION IN AIR. 73 flected from a plane metallic mirror. This mirror should be so placed that the direct wave will strike it normally, and consequently, the reflected wave will travel in the opposite direction to that of the direct wave. (See Fig. 43.) Under these conditions we should obtain true stationary waves if the vibrations of the oscillator were not damped; but, because of this damping, and for the same reasons as were developed in Chapter VII, the phenomenon of multiple résonance will occur. It is needless to repeat the discussion given on pages 61-64: the phenomena in this case are exactly similar. If a resonator be moved between the oscillator and the mirror, a sériés of nodes and loops ^vill be observed ; the nodes are the points where the resonator fails to respond to the oscillator, the loops are those wThere the intensity of the phenomenon is a maximum. The intemode, or distance between two nodes, is equal to the half wave-length of the vibration of the resonator in air; just as in the case of propagation along a wire, the internode was equal to the half wave-length of the vibration of the re- sonator when traveling along a wire. If, then, the internode in air is the same as along a wire, the wave-length in air is equal to that in a wire, and Maxwell’s theory is true. 2. Experiments at Karlsruhe.— This is the experimentum crucis which Hertz first performed at Karlsruhe. He did not at once obtain the expected resuit. Along a wire his resonator gave an internode of 3 meters ; in air it seemed to show an intemode of 4.50 meters, or 9 meters wTave-length. This experiment seemed undeniably to condemn the old electrodynamic theory, which demanded an infinité w7ave-length ; but it seemed none the less to condemn the theory of Maxwell, which involved a wave-length of 6 meters.74 MAXWELL’® THEORY. This failure is still unsatisfactorily explained. It is prob- able that the mirror was too small with respect to the wave- length, and that diffraction entered to disturb the phenomena. Perhaps also, the reflection of the waves from the walls of the room or from the cast-iron columns which divided the roorn into three sections, may hâve exercised a disturbing influence. However this may be, the smallest oscillators gave a dif- ferent resuit, and showed the same internode in air as in a wire; doubtless the smaller wave-length was not too great with respect to the dimensions of the mirror. 3. Expérimenta at Geneva.— Still, the question was not settled, and illness prevented Hertz from continuing his ex- periments. MM. Sarasin and de la Rive took them up with sufficient précautions to eliminate ail sources of error. Their mirror was 8x16 meters, and they worked in a very large and unencumbered room. The results were as clear with the 75 centimeter resonator (having the same wave-length as Hertz’s large oscillator) as with the smaller ones. These ex- periments must thus be regarded as conclusive. In conformity with Maxwell’s theory, the internode was the same in air as in a wire. 4. Use of the Small Oscillator.— The experiment may be more easily repeated with the small oscillator of Hertz, which, we hâve seen (page 35), consists in a short rod of métal divided in the middle. Parabolic mirrors are in common use for gathering the light emanating from a small source into a beam of parallel ray s. Such an apparatus is called a parabolic projector or rè- flector. The radiations produced by an oscillator may be treated in almost the same way; only the dimensions of the oscillator are comparable to those of the mirror, so that the former is more like a luminous line than a luminous point.PROPAGATION IN AIR. 75 Hence, instead of giving the mirror the form of a para- boloid of révolution witb the source of the radiations at its focus, it is made in the form of a parabolic cylinder and the oscillator is placed in its focal line. (Fig. 44.) Thus a parallel beam of electrical radiations is obtained. T° -50 -H 00 CM. Fig. 44.— Hertz’s apparatns for concentrating the radiations of an oscillator by means of a parabolic mirror of zinc. (From “ Electric Waves,” Eng. Trans.) In like manner the resonator, which is just like the os- eillator, may be placed in the focal line of a second parabolic mirror. This mirror concentrâtes the parallel rays upon the Tesonator.76 MAXWELL’S THEORY. ïlowever, in the interférence experiments just described, the second mirror should not be used, for it wonld act as a screen to shield the resonator from the reflected wave. 5. Nature of the Radiations.— The field which surrounds an oscillator is traversed by electromagnetic radiations: the theory enables us to formulate the laws of their distribution, and these hâve been further confirmed by experiment, at least in their general characteristics, which are ail that our présent means of investigation enable us to détermine. These laws are rather complex, and, in order to simplify their exposition, we shall consider only those points of the field which are a long distance from the oscillator. Imagine a sphere of very large radius, having its center at the middle of the oscillator. At each point of this sphere there is a variable electromotive force, which passes through zéro and changes sign twice during each oscillation but does not change its direction. There is also a magnetic force which varies in a similar manner. What is the direction of these two vibrations — the one electric, the other magnetic ? Trace on the sphere a System of meridians and parallels, as on a terrestrial globe ; the pôles being at the points where the sphere is eut by the axis of the oscillator produced. The electric force at any point will be tangent to the meridian; the magnetic force, to the parallel. (Fig. 45.) The two vibrations are thus at right angles to each other, and both are perpendicular to the radius of the sphere — that is, to the direction of propagation, corresponding to what is, in optics, the direction of the ray of light. These two vibra- tions are thus transverse, like those of light. The amplitude of these vibrations varies inverselv as the distance from the oscillator, hence the intensity varies in- versely as the square of the distance.PROPAGATION IX AIR. 77 The vibration maintains, as we hâve seen, a constant di- rection ; hence it is comparable to the vibrations of polarized light, rather than those of ordinary light, which constantly change their direction while remaining perpendicular to the path of the ray. Another question présents itself: What is it tliat corre- sponds to the plane of polarization in optics ? Is it the plane Fig. 45.— A portion of the spherical wave-front proceeding from an oscillator. The full lines indicate the magnetic force, the broken Unes, the electric force. The direction of propagation is perpendicular to both of these, and is therefore radial. perpendicular to the electrical vibration ? Or is it the plane perpendicular to the magnetic vibration? We shall see in Chapter XI how it may be shown that the former of these hypothèses is correct. Another différence from the radiations emitted by a source of ordinary light: the intensity is not the same in ail direc- tions. It is a maximum at the equator and zéro at the pôles78 MAXWELL^ THEORT. (retuming to the network of meridians and parallels which we snpposed to be traced on our sphere). Aside from these différences, the mode of propagation of an electromagnetic disturbance through air is the same as that of light. In the case of propagation along a wire, also, we had displacement currents; but these were sensible only j Fig. 46.— A portion of the wave-front surrounding a perfectly con- ducting wire transmitting oscillations. The magnetic force forms closed circles concentric with the wire, which slide along without expanding : hence the intensity of the wave remains constant. The electric force, and hence the displacement currents, are radial, and so are strongest close to the wire. in the air in the immédiate neighborhood of the wire. In- stead of spreading out in ail directions, the disturbance was propagated along a single line ; consequently its intensity was maintained, instead of diminishing according to the law of inverse squares. (Fig. 46.)CHAPTER IX. PROPAGATION IN DIELECTRICS. 1. Maxwell’s Relation.— When, in a condenser, we replace the layer of insulating air by a layer of some other insulat- ing substance, we find that the capacity of the condenser is multiplied by a coefficient which is called the “ spécifie in- ductive capacity ” of this substance. The theory demands that the velocity of propagation of electric waves in a dielec- tric be inversely proportional to the square root of the spé- cifie inductive capacity of the dielectric. Again, the velocity of light in a transparent medium is inversely proportional to the index of refraction. Hence the spécifie inductive capacity should be equal to the square of this index. This is the theoretical relation of Maxwell. It is poorly verified, except for sulphur. This may be explained in two ways:—either the index of refraction for very long waves, such as electrical oscillations, is not the same as the optical index of refraction — which would not be at ail surprising, since wre know that different radiations are unequally refrangible, and that the index for red is differ- ent from the index for violet — ; or the square of the electrical index of refraction may itself be different from the spécifie inductive capacity as measured by static methods in an in- variable field — which could be explained by varions second- ary effects, such as residual charges. Hence the necessity of measuring the spécifie inductive capacity by two sorts of methods : the dvnamic methods, based on the use of electrical oscillations, which will give the elec- trical index of refraction ; and the static methods, in a con- stant field. [79]80 MAXWELL’S THEORY. 2. Dynamic Methods.— The veloeity of propagation is the same in air or along a metallic wire stretched in the air. So also, the veloeity of propagation through a dielectric shonld be the same asHhe veloeity along a wire immersed in the dielectric. Hence it is sufficient to measure the latter. We hâve seen how the wave-length of an electrical oscilla- tion may be determined bv measuring the distance between the nodes on a wire, by means of a resonator (see page 59). If the wire be immersed in a dielectric, the veloeity of propagation is diminished : as the period remains the same, the wave-length and the distance between the nodes are di- minished in the same ratio. Thus we may simply measure this ratio, which is the reciprocal of the electrical index of refraction. Suppose again that the resonator used for exploration be made of a condenser whose plates are joined by a wire (Blond- lot’s resonator). If a laver of insulating material be placed between the plates, the capaeity of the condenser is mul- tiplied by the spécifie inductive capaeity; the period of vi- bration to which the resonator responds is thus increased, and, consequentlv, also the distance between the nodes. If the wire along which the electrical oscillations are propa- gated, and the resonator with its condenser, be immersed in the same dielectric, the two effects should exactly balance eacli other, and the distance between the nodes should be unchanged. This is found to be the case. These methods of measuring the electrical refractive index are analogous to the interférence refractometer in optics. We may also make use of the refraction of the electric rays by a prism of the dielectric ; or, better still, of total reflection. 3. Static Methods.— To measure an inductive capacitv in a constant field we must compare two capacities. This may be done :PROPAGATION IN DIELECTRICS. 81 First. By discharging a condenser through a ballistic gab vanometer, which measures the quantity of electricity which flows ; Second. By charging and discharging a condenser a great number of times per second, and comparing the intermittent current thus produced with a continuons current through a given résistance (MaxwelFs method) ; Third. By connecting two condensers in sériés, and prov- ing the equality of their capacities by showing that the po- tential of the middle plates is the arithmetical mean of the potentials of the terminal plates ( Gordon s method) ; Fourth. By measuring the attraction between two electri- fied spheres immersed in the dielectric ; Fiftli. By connecting in opposition two electrometers whose needles and whose corresponding pairs of quadrants are re- spectively in met allie connection, and which are immersed, one in a dielectric, the other in air (Differential electrometer) ; Sixih. By studying the déviation of the lines of force in an electrostatic field occasioned by the introduction of a prism of dielectric material (FéroFs method of equipotential sur- faces). 4. Eesults.— These different methods give very discordant results. For resin, the following values hâve been obtained for the spécifie inductive capacity, which we shall call s : Square of the optical index. By equipotential surfaces .. With Hertzian oscillations By ballistic galvanometer .. By another static method .. By the method of attraction 2.0 2.1 2.12 2.03 2.88 5.44 For alcohol, water, and ice we find still greater discrep- ancies. 6.82 MAXWELL’*8f THEORY. Alcohol.— a. The static methods gave for values in the neighborhood of 4.9, that is, quite different from the optical index; b. Yet, Stchegtiœf, using Gordon’s method with oscilla- tions produced b y a Ruhmkorff coil, found for value not far from the optical index. e. Methods founded on the use of Hertzian oscillations gave a value in the neighborhood of 4.9. Water.— a. M. Gouy, by a method of attraction, found: e =80. The value of £ varies, of course, with the impurities in the water, which render it more or less conducting; 80 is the value which £ approaches as the conductivity of the wTater approaches zéro.. 6. Herr Colin measured e by determining the wave-length in a wire immersed in water. He found that e dépends upon the conductivity of the water and on the température. His values are near to that of M. Gouy. c. Only one expérimenter lias found for e a value approach- ing the square of the optical index, £ =1.75. Ice.— A static method gave s = 78, a value close to that obtained by M. Gouy for water. M. Blondlot, on the other hand, found, by the use of Hertzian oscillations e = 2.5 and M. Pérot, by the same method, obtained a similar value. Thus we find an enormous différence between the values of MM. Blondlot and Pérot, on the one hand, and the num- ber 78, on the other. 5. Conducting Bodies.— Substances transparent to light are, in general, bad conductors ; the metals, on the contrary, are very good conductors and very opaque. There is noth-PROPAGATION IN DIELECTRICS. 83 ing paradoxical about this. The dielectrics offer to elec- trie waves an elastic reaction (see Chapter II) which re- turns the energy imparted to them ; hence they permit the oscillations to pass. Conductors, on the other hand, offer a viscous résistance which destroys the kinetic energy to con- vert it into heat ; hence they absorb electric waves and light. Indeed, it is found that the metals stop electrical waves like a screen ; they» make an imperfect screen for oscillations of very long period, but their opacity is almost absolute for Ilertzian waves. The experiments of Herr Bjerknes, cited above (page 50), show that these radiations cannot pene- trate a métal to a depth greater than a hundredth of a mil- limeter. Nevertheless, Prof essor Bose, whose very sensitive appa- ratus will be described later, apparently observed the péné- tration of metals by his radiations; but M. Branly has re- cently shown that a metallic envelope is impénétrable, even to the very rapid oscillations obtained by Professor Bose, provided that the envelope is absolutely closed. Even the smallest opening invites diffraction sufficient to affect the very sensitive detector of Professor Bose. 6. Electrolytes— Thus ail conducting bodies are opaque ; ail insulators are transparent. This rule admits of apparent exceptions. Certain substances, like ebonite, are insulators ivithout being transparent. But it is found that, although opaque to visible light, they transmit Hertzian radiations. There is no more reason for surprise at this than at the passage of red light through a red glass which will not trans- mit green light. Besides, these substances, wThich are trans- parent to electrical waves of long period, would naturally act as dielectrics in a static field, where the period may be regarded as infinité.84 MAXWELL’S THEORY. On the other hand, certain liquids, like sait or acidulated water, are conductors of electricity but transparent to light. This is becanse such liquids, which are decomposed by a cur- rent and are called electrolytes, hâve a conductivity of a very different nature from that of metals. The molécules of the electrolyte are decomposed into “ ions/’ and the electricity is transported from one electrode to the other by these ions, which travel through the liquid. Hence the electrical energy is not transformed into heat, as in the case of metals, but into Chemical energy. Doubtless this process, which dépends upon the comparatively slow movement of the ions, has not time to take place if the vibra- tions are as rapid as those of light. In fact, the electrolytes are somewhat transparent even to Hertzian waves.CHAPTER X. PRODUCTION OF VERY RAPID OSCILLATIONS. 1. Very Short Waves.— Blondlot’s oscillator gives a wave- length of 30 meters, the large oscillator of Hertz a wave- length of 6 meters, and the small oscillator of Hertz, 60 centimeters. In other words, we hâve : Vibrations per second. Witli the oscillator of Blondlot........................... 10,000,000 With the large oscillator of Hertz......................... 50,000,000 With the small oscillator of Hertz......................... 500,0 0,000 But this is not the limit. The learned Italian physi- cist, Sig. Righi, and after him, the young Hindoo professor, Sagadis Chunder Bose, constructed appara- tus which enabled them to go much farther. Theoretically it was only necessary to decrease the size of the apparatus; but this also diminished the in- tensity of the oscillations, and extremely sensitive detectors had to be devised to ob- serve them. 2. Righi’s Oscillator.— This oscillator consists in two spheres of brass, A and B (Fig. 47), fixed in the centers of two dises of wood, glass, or ebonite. These dises form the [85] O o- Fig. 47.— Righi’s oscillator. This is similar to Lodge's (Fig. 24), but the balls are smaller and the spark occurs in a vessel of oil. The waves emitted are thus very short, but not correspond- ingly feeble.86 MAXWELL’S THEORY. bottom and top of a cylindrieal vessel witli flexible sides, whose diameter is much greater than its height. In one of the dises is a small bole for filling the vessel with vaseline oil. The flexibility of the side walls of the vessel permits the use of varions arrangements for regulating the distance between the spheres. The spark leaps between the two spheres, as in Lodge’s oscil- lator ; but, owing to the small dimensions of the spheres, the wave-length is very small. We hâve seen above the advantages of having the spark occur in oil. It is through this artifice that the oscillations retain sufficient intensity, notwithstanding the smallness of the apparatus ; for we hâve seen that the use of oil strengthens the oscillations, while improving the regularity of the sparks. For charging the oscillator, Righi used, not an induction coil, but a Holtz statical machine. This has also been used with Hertz’s oscillators. It is important to note that the spheres A and B are not connected directly to the two pôles of the Holtz machine,— these pôles are connected metallically to two other spheres, C and D ; the sphere C being placed at a short distance from A, the sphere D close to B. Thus three sparks are produced ; the first. between C and A, the second between A and B, and the third between B and D. The first and last occur in air, and the second in oil. It is the second spai'k that has the oscillatory character. The two others, which take place in air, serve only to charge the two spheres A and B. When these hâve received sufficient charges, the spark A B breaks through the oil and the oscilla- tions commence. It is important to properlv adjust the lengths of the three sparks: Righi gave the middle spark a length of about oneVERY RAPID OSCILLATIONS. 87 millimeter, and the others two centimeters. The diameter of the spheres A and B was about four centimeters. The wave- length was about ten centimeters, hence the frequency was 3,000,000,000 vibrations per second. With spheres of eight millimeters diameter Sig. Righi ob- tained oscillations four times as rapid. 3. Besonators— Notwithstanding the improvements intro- duced by Righi in the construction of his oscillator, its effects are still very feeble, and especially sensitive resonators are required to detect them. Two principles guided the learned Italian in designing his resonator: first, the sparks are much longer, for a given différence of potential, when they play across the surface of an insulating body than when they leap through free air; and second, as the electromagnetic effects are propagated only on the surface of a métal, the thickness of the metallic parts of a resonator may be reduced without détriment. Righi deposited electrolytically, on a plate of glass, a thin film of silver in the form of a rectangle much longer than wide. Across the middle of the rectangle the silver film is eut through by a diamond, leaving a gap a few thousandths of a millimeter wide. Tt is across this gap that the sparks play. They respond to very small différences of potential, since the space to be bridged is so narrow and the sparks pass across the surface of the glass. The sparks are observed by means of a small microscope. This resonator opérâtes in the same manner as the recth linear resonators of Hertz. The rays of electrical force emanating from the oscillator are rendered parallel by a mirror in the form of a parabolic cylinder, and another simi- lar mirror concentrâtes them on the resonator. This very sensitive apparatus is well adapted to measure- ment. If the resonator be rotated, the action becomes a maxi-88 MAXWELL'S THEORY. mum when the resonator is parallel to the oscillator, that is, to the line joining the centers of the two spheres, A and B; it is zéro when the resonator is perpendicular to the oscil- lator, and in other positions it takes intermediate values. Thus, the position of the resonator when sparks began to appear af- fords an indication of the in- tensity of the radiations. 4. Bose’s Oscillator.—Prof. Ja- gadis Chunder Bose has obtained still more rapid oscillations. His oscillator consists in three metal- lic spheres, A, B and C (Fig. 48); the two spheres A and C con- nected to the pôles of a Ruhmkorfï coil, the middle sphere, B, insulated. Sparks leap between A and B, and between B and C. This is another form of Lodge’s oscillator. The sparks occur in air; still, the électrodes must not be allowed to deteriorate if the discharge is to retain its oscilla- tory character. To this end, Prof essor Bose uses spheres of platinum instead of brass, and, instead of operating his coil with a vibrating interrupter, he uses a hand break. Each motion of the hand gives him a single sériés of decreasing os- cillations, in place of an uninterrupted stream of sparks which would rapidly destroy the électrodes. With these précautions, the discharges continue to be os- cillatory without the necessity of frequent cleaning and polish- ing of the balls. The radiations are feeble, but Professor Bose dépends for his results on the sensitiveness of his detector. He finds the intensitv of the action less important than its regularity and constancy, without which measurements would be impossible ; (nearly full size). The plati- num sphere B, which is insu- lated, is the seat of the oscilla- tions. The spheres A and C are connected to the induction-coil. L is a cylindrical lens for con- centrating the radiation.YERY RAPID OSCILLATIONS. 89 indeed, in his estimation, very strong oscillations would be detrimental, for reflection and diffraction might produce secondary radiations capable of affecting the detector and dis- turbiug the observations. The coil and battery are inclosed in a double metallic case, alinost entirely closed, so that they can exert no disturbing influence on the exterior. The tube containing the oscillator is mounted on the box, and the radiations are rendered par- allel by a cylindrical lens of sulphur or ebonite. This apparatus gives a wave-length of six millimeters, which corresponds to 50,000,000,000 vibrations per second. Vibrations 10,000 times as rapid would suflice to impress the retina (they would correspond to the orange rays of the spectrum) ; thus, says Prof essor Bose, we are within thirteen octaves of visible light. It has been found possible to pro- duce a pencil of parallel electric rays with a cross-section of one or two square centimeters. 5. Bose’s Detector.— The detector is based on the princi- ple of the Branly coherer, or radio-conductor. The coherer is an instrument of marvelous sensitiveness, but it is some- what eapricious in its action. At times it becomes so ex- traordinarily sensitive that the galvanometer is deflected with- out any apparent cause ; and again, when it seems to be work- ing admirably, its sensitiveness suddenly disappears. Per- haps some of the particles corne into too intimate contact ; or again, the contact surfaces lose their sensitiveness through fatigue due to prolonged activity. Professor Bose modified the original coherer to overcome these defects. Pièces of fine Steel wire were wound into spirals, which were placed side by side in a narrow groove in a block of ebonite, each tiny spiral touching its neighbor in a well-defined contact. At each end of the groove were pièces of brass, one fixed and the other capable of sliding, and both90 MAXWELL'*8f THEORY. connected to the terminais of a battery, A screw regulated the pressure of the movable block upon the first spiral, and this pressure was transmitted from spiral to spiral, so that it was uniform over ail the contacts. The current from the battery entered at the upper spiral, and, passing from one to the other through the contacts be- tween them, left through the lower spiral. When electromagnetic radiations impinge upon the ap- paratus, the résistance offered by the sériés of contacts is diminished, the current traversing them from the battery is increased, and the variation is shown by a galvanometer. As ail the points of contact lie in the same straight line, the radiations may be concentrated upon them by means of a cylindrical lens. The sensitiveness of this apparatus is exquisite, and it re- sponds to ail radiations over the range of an octave. It may be made sensitive to radiations of different kinds by varying the electromotive force of the battery which opérâtes it. The apparatus is inclosed in a metallic case with no open- ing but a narrow slit. It is thus protected from ail radiations except those which are concentrated on this slit.CHAPTER XI. IMITATION OF OPTICAL PHENOMENA. 1. Conditions of Imitation—According to Maxwell’s îdeas, light is nothing more nor less than an electromagnetic disturbance propagated through air, space, or other trans- parent medium. The electrical radiations emanating from an oscillator differ from light only in their period, and it is simply because their wave-length is too great that they do not impress the retina. We hâve seen that these disturbances travel at exactly the same velocity as light, but this is not sufficient; it must be shown that they possess ail the properties of light, and that we can reproduce with them ail optical phenomena. The great length of the waves is, however, a serious ob- stacle ; to reproduce the conditions under which optical phe- nomena are observed, ail dimensions must be increased in proportion to the wave-length, according to the law of sim- ilarity. If we are using, for example, the large oscillator of Hertz (wave-length six meters), a mirror, to bear the same relation to its radiations as a mirror one millimeter square bears to light, would hâve to be ten kilometers square. Even with Bose’s little oscillator, we should need a mirror ten meters square. It is évident that this condition can be only imperfectly fulfilled, but the approximation will be doser as we use shorter waves. Hertz obtained fairly good results with his small oscillator ; but, as might be expected, Righi and Bose, who used waves only one-tenth and one-hundredth as long, achieved a much more perfect imitation. [91192 MAXWELL’8 THEORY. 2. Interférence.— We considered in Chapter VIII the in- terférence produced between the electric waves proceeding directly from an oscillator and those reflected by a metallic mirror. In these experiments the two interfering rays — the direct ray and the reflected ray — were traveling in opposite directions. (Fig. 49.) Here the conditions are very different from those which obtain in optical apparatus designed for the study of inter- férence, where the two rays travel in the same sense and inter- sect at a very acute angle. The more acute this angle, the /. 6. 3. ^ ^y / , y f E—(r 14 * I IV» < N ✓ > 7 : z 5. Fig. 49.— Interférence by reflection from a single mirror, M. 1, 2, 3, etc., represent wave fronts differing in phase by a half period, 1 to 4 being direct and 4' to 7 reflected and reversed in sign. The planes in which two opposite wave fronts, 4-4', 5-3, 2-6, etc., meet are interférence striæ, separated by a half wave-length, A 2 wider are the interférence fringes, and hence the easier to observe. In optics we do not ordinarily produce interférence between rays traveling in opposite senses, for this would give fringes of a few ten-thousandths of a millimeter only. Not until quite recently did Wiener succeed in observing the optical bands produced under such conditions, though it is this phenomenon that is utilized in M. Lippmann’s proc- ess of color photography. M. Lippmann places the sensitive plate against a surface of mercury, which acts as a mirror. The direct ray interfères with the ray reflected from the mer-IMITATION OF OPTICAL PHENOMENA. 93 ccurs a local circuit is com- pleted through a battery and a sensitive relay, which in tura opérâtes the recording apparatus and sets in motion132 WIRELESS TELEGRAPHY. an automatic tapper, which strikes the tube of the coherer and restores it to its original condition of high résistance. Fig. 68.— Marconi’s early transmitting apparatus, consisting in a Righi oscillator, deed, mounted in the focus of a parabolic reflector, f. b is a key for operating the induction coil c. 2. Marconi’s Early Apparatus.*— An early form of Mar- coni’s apparatus is shown in Figs. 68 and 69. The trans- See Marconi, Eng. pat. No. 12,039, June 2, 1896.TELEGRAPHY BY HE RT ZI AN WAVES. 133 mitting device is a Kighi oscillator (see p. 85) mounted in the focal line of a parabolic reflector of copper or zinc. The receiver comprises a similar mirror with a coherer placed in its focus. To the terminais of the coherer are attached two strips of copper, whose length is carefully adjusted so as to màke die period of oscillation of the coherer System the same as that of the oscillator. Wires Fig. 69.— Receiver of Marconi’s early apparatus. The coherer j is mounted on the focus of a second parabolic mirror l, and is provided with wings, k, whose length is adjusted to résonance, n is a relay and h the recording apparatus. from the ends of the coherer pass through holes in the mirror to the relay and recording apparatus, which is shown diagrammatically in Fig. 69. This arrangement, crüde as it is, was used success- fully over distances of two or three miles ; but it has seri-134 WIRELÈSS TELEGRAPHY. ©us limitations. In the first place, the wave-length of the ©scillator is very short — only a foot or so, depending upon the size of the halls. Such short waves are peculiarly susceptible to absorption by obstacles — a few buildings or a small hill in the path of the waves being sufficient to eut them' off quite effectually — while a longer wave, com- parable in size to the obstacles themselves, would be hardly affected at ail. In like manner, a rock protruding from the water stops the small waves which pass over the sur- face, while the larger ones seem scarcely to notice it. Another and even more serious drawback is the feeble intensity of the waves. How to increase their energy, and hence the distance over which signaling would be possi- ble, was the next important problem to be solved. The charged balls of the oscillator, at the moment the spark occurs and the oscillations commence, represents a certain amount of energy. This energy oscillâtes back and forth until it is ail radiated into space or frittered away in the spark-gap, but no new supply can be drawn from the source, however powerful, until this is used up and a new spark occurs. Ail the energy of a wave-train must be stored in the charged conductors before the oscillations commence. There are two ways of increasing this energy: first, by increasing the potential to which the conductors are charged, and second, by increasing the capacity of the conductors themselves. The former may seem at first glance the more promising, as the energy of the charge increases as the square of the potential; but a practical limit is soon reached. The différence of potential dépends upon the length of the spark-gap ; if we increase this be- yond a certain point, the spark is so attenuated that theTELEGRAPHY BY HERTZ!AN WAVES. 135 discharge is not strong enough to keep it hot, and most of the energy is wasted in overcoming its ohmic résistance, This difficulty may be part-ly overcome by causing the spark to break through oil, and so making a high potential possible with a short, thick spark which does not waste much energy. But even here a limit is soon reached, and it is necessary to fall back on the second means of increas- ing the energy,— by increasing the size and capacity of the oscillator. This has the further advantage of increasing fe=£ t2 U t CiO Fig. 70.— Marconi’s improved apparatus with two capacity areas, the wave-length, and so reducing the interférence of obstacles. 3. Improved Apparatus— Another form of Marconi’s apparatus is shown in Fig. 70.* The two halls of the spark- gap are connected respectively to two plates of métal, hung on insulators, which constitute the capacity areas of the oscillator ; — in other words, Hertz’s “ large oscillator ” *Loc. cit.136 WIRELESS TELEGRAPHY. (p. 34), magnified. The receiving apparatus is similar but the spark balls are replaced by a coherer. A similar arrangement was used by Sir Oliver Lodge, who employed large conical surfaces, arranged like an hour-glass, in place of the fiat plates.* (Fig. 71.) The results of these experiments fully confirm the theory : with the larger apparatus, the distance over which signais could be transmitted was greatly increased, and it was found possible to dispense entirely with the large and Fig. 71.— Lodge’s conical capacity-areas. cumbersome reflectors which had been used to concentrate the radiations. Indeed, Marconi showed that, other things being equal, the distance of transmission depended upon the size of the plates, their height above the earth, and, to some extent, their distance aparté The second point is a matter of importance, for it reminds us that the radia- tions we are dealing with are polarized, and that the dis- placements in the ether take place in a direction parallel See Lodge, Eng. Pat. No. 11,575, Feb. 5, 1898.TELEGRAPHY BY HERTZIAN WAVES. 137 to the axis of thé oscillator.* If the axis be horizontal, the waves striking the earth will indnoe currents parallel to the oscillator, and much of the energy will be absorbed and wasted in ohmic losses. Elevating the oscillator only diminishes the trouble, but does not remove it. Lodge placed his oscillator in a vertical position, and so avoided this difficulty, only to fail into another — the very Fig. 72.— Popoff’s receiver. AB, the coherer ; CDE, the relay ; GH, a combined bell and tapper. practical one of supporting his large cônes in the air and of providing meians for getting at the spark-gap and other apparatus which must be placed between them. But happily another solution was forthcoming. *Approximately — See Chap. IV.138 WIRELE 8 8 TELEGRAPHY. 4. The Antenna.— About this time, Prof. Popoff, who had been using a modified form of the coherer in investi- gating the effects of distant lightning discharges,* under- took to apply the same apparatus to wireless telegraphy. His arrangement is shown in Fig. 72. The coherer, relay, and tapper were arranged in essentially the same way as Marconi’s (p. 138), but instead of attaching capacitv areas to the two terminais of the coherer, he connected one end to the ground and the other to a vertical wire, or antenna, supported by a mast. This antenna played an important part in picking up the waves produced by lightning discharges, and the in- tensity of the effect was found to dépend upon the height of the antenna — the longer the wire, the stronger the impulse. At first ’glance it would seem that the same should be true in wireless telegraphy; a high antenna, cutting a large slice out of the advancing wave-front, should take up more energy from the ether and give a stronger signal than would a shorter one. But in practice this was not the cafce; a limit was reached beyond which an in- crease in height had very little effect. We must seek the explanation in the fact that the radia- tions dealt with in the two cases differ widely in character. We know that a lightning-flash is oscillatory, and that it sets up a train of waves which, as Popoff found, may be detected at long distances ; in fact, when a discharge occurs between two clouds, or between a cloud and the earth, we hâve practically a huge Hertzian oscillator, giving off elec- tromagnetic waves of tremendous energy. As the size of * Popoff, Jour. of Russian Physico-Chemical Soc.y v. 28-29, p. 896, 1895.TELEGRAPHY BY HERTZIAN WAVES. 139 the oscillator détermines the wave-length of its radiations, and as ordinary Hertzian waves may be measured in métrés, we might expect a great cloud-oscillator to émit waves several miles in length — and this is inaeed the case. Now, when a wave strikes an an tonna, it indnces an electromotive force in the wire. If the wire is vertical and the distance from the source is great, we may assume that the wire is parallel to the wave-front, and that ail parts of it are affected alike. The disturbance started at the top travels downward with the velocity of light, gatlier- ing force as it goes ; but by the time it has reached a point a half wave-length distant from the top, the incoming wave is reversed in phase, and the direct impulse re- ceived at that point destroys the efïect of that transmitted from the top. At shorter distances, where the différence in phase is smaller, the interférence is less complété ; but there is evidently no advantage in lengthening the antenna beyond the quarter wave-length of the oscillations to be received, unless the object is to reach above the région affected by obstacles. With lightning discharges, the limit is never reached; but with the radiations of short wave-length used for telegraphing at the time of Popoff’s experiments, it is little wonder that the results were dis- appointing. Marccni went a step farther, and used an antenna at the sending station also — and this marks an epoch in the history of wireless telegraphy.* At once the limits in the size of the apparatus were removed indefinitely ; the wave- length and power of the radiations were greatly increased ; the interférence of obstacles began to disappear: as the * Eng. pat. No. 12,039, June 2, 1896, claim 16.140 WIRELESS TELEGRAPHY. apparatus was perfected, the available range of signaling was increased at a surprising rate; ere long, the news came to the world that signais had been received across the Atlantic océan, and commercial wireless telegraphy became an acknowledged fact. But there were many things to be leamed before this point was reached, and we must now trace the development of the idea along this new line.CHAPTER III. / THE GBOUHEtED OSCTLLA1TOB. 1. Development of the Antenna.— The advent of the grounded oscillating System found many investigators in the field, and each contributed something to the develop- ment of the new idea. Marconi at first considered it important to hâve a large capacity area on the end of the antenna, after the fashion Fig. 73.— Marconi’s grounded antenna, with large capacity area. uE is tlie transmitting antenna, with spark gaps de, ee, ed; wE, the receiving antenna with coherer, j. of the Hertzian oscillator, and we find him nsing the ap- paratus shown in Fig. 73, with an elevated metallic plate connected to ground through his original Righi spark ap- [141]142 WIRELESS TELEGRAPHY. paratus.* Guarini employed a similar arrangement in the form of a cage or cône of wires,f hung from a mast (Fig. 74), and many other forms of capacity areas wero devised ; but it was found that such devices were of com- parativelv limited value, and they gradually gave place to a simple vertical wire, supported by a mast and connected at its lower end to the spark apparatus. Here we must note the distinction between this- form of apparatus and that used by Hertz for the study of waves in wires. (See p. 48.) In the lat- ter case, the connection between the oscillator proper and the wire was through a condenser — a sort of elastic coupling — and the size and capacity of the wire were so small that it exerted compara- tivelv little influence upon the oscillator, which was thus free to perforai its own vibrations and communicate them to the wire. The effect is analogous to that of a large and heavy pendulum connected to a smaller and lighter one through a spring. The natural period of the small pendulum has, of course,, a slight effect on the vibrations of the larger one, but * Marconi, En g. pat. No. 12,039, June 2, 1896. t Guarini, in Elec. Rev., v. 51, p. 921, 1902.THE GROUNDED OSCILLATOR. 143 the latter prédominâtes and forces the other to swing with it. So, in Hertz?s experiment, the disturbance in the wire was a forced oscillation of the period of the main oscillator, and it was at first suggested that the same might be true in the case of an antenna grounded through a pair of spark balls — that the real seat of the oscillation is in the mass- ive conductors near the spark, and that the antenna play s only a secondary part, as a radiator. But this is not the case. The coupling between the different parts of the apparatus is here a rigid metallic connection, and the Sys- tem vibrâtes as a whole with a period determined mainly Fig. 75.— Various forms of multiple-wired antennæ :— a, Braun’s grid ; b, Slaby’s cylinder ; c, Marconi’s fan. by the height and dimensions of the antenna. For a single wire, the wave-length is equal to four times the height, but w7here the antenna is loaded with a capacity area, the wave- length is correspondingly increased. It is true that ail irrégularités in the apparatus hâve their effect in pro- ducing harmonies or inharmonic overtones, and herein lies one disadvantage of the large capacity area. It is much as144 WIRELES8 TELEGRAPHY. if we tried to. strengthen and deepen the tone of a piano cord by hanging a weight in the middle. We might suc- ceed to some extent, but the note would be harsh and jarring: the better means is to increase the mass of the whole string uniformly by winding it with wire. This is, in effect, what is done with the antenna : when the energy Fir». 76.— Large multiple antenna used by Marconi in trans-atlantic experiments. of the oscillation of a single wire is liot sufficient, the capacity is increased by adding other wires in parallel con- nection, as shown in Fig. 75. Braun* arranged them as a harp or grid (a) ; Slaby,f as éléments of a cylinder (b) ; Marconi,% as a fan (c) ; but the form which seems most. effective for long-distance installations is that of an in- verted cône or pyramid made up of a large number of wires or cables, radiating from a common vertex, from which a connection is made to the spark apparatus. Fig. 7 6 illus- * Braun, Eng. pat. No. 12,420. App. June 14, 1899. t Slaby, Die Funkentelegraphie, p. 66. t See Righi-Dessau, Die Télégraphié ohne Draht, p. 473.THE GROUNDED OSCILLATOR. 145 trates such an antenna as used by Marconi in his trans- atlantic work. Not the least advantage of the multiple^wired antenna lies in the fact of its comparatively low résistance. The currents which surge back and forth through the wire, though of short duration, are surprisingly heavy — often many times what would be sufficient to melt the wire if they were continuons. Moreover, as we hâve already seen, such rapid oscillations are confined to a thin skin on the outside of the wire, and do not penetrate into the interior; hence, the résistance of the wire dépends, not upon its area, but on its circumference, and a number of thin wires are much more effective than a single large one of the same cross-section. As a large amount of energy may be wasted in ohmic lusses in the wire, this considération is of no small moment, especially where prolonged oscilla- tions are desired.* * As a nuraerical example, take the case of a certain multiple antenna wliose constants the writer has carefully measured. It consista in five copper wires, fifty feet long, connected at their lower ends to a single ground wire .10 inch m diameter, and twenty feet long. The capacity of the antenna to ground is .00022 microfarad, hence its initial charge at a potential of, say 20,000 volts, would be Q=CV=.00022 x 10"g x 20,000=44 x 10-7 coulombs. The frequency, N, of the oscillation is almost exactly 3,000,000 cycles per second; hence the current in the wire during the first swing, before the energy becomes dissipated, would be I=Q x 4N x 2 y2 = 58 amps. The effective thickness of the “skin” at this frequency is about .001 inch, hence the cross-section of wire in the ground connection available for carrying the current is n x —x 77^ = .0003 square inches, and the current density, 58 .0003= 10 ~ 1U00 = 19,000 amps. per square inch. The résistance of such a shell of copper is about .0008 ohms per cen- 1014G WI RELE88 TELEGRAPH Y, Still anotlier reason Avhy a large capacity area is of limited utility is found in the considérations outlined on page 125. If \ve increase the capacity of the antenna without a corresponding increase in its height, the energy of the System is indeed augmented, but the proportion of this energy radiated during each oscillation is diminished, owing to the lower freqnency. The rate of radiation is not improved by the increased capacity of the oscillator, though the total energy given off is greater.* When the coherer is used for receiving, it is the former that counts, and the “ whip crack ” discharge of a strongly damped radiator is more effective than a prolonged oscillation of the same energy. Of la te, however, improved receivers and tuned apparatus hâve made prolonged oscillations of great value, as will appear in the chapter on syntonie methods. 2. Other Means of Increasing the Radiation.— Thus far, we hâve been content with increasing the energy of the oscillations by increasing the capacity of the oscillator. Let us now take up the second means of doing this — by increasing the potential to Avhich it is charged. timetre, or sav .5 ohm for the 20 foot ground wire. Hence the rate of dissipation of energy due to the résistance of the ground connection alone is I2R = 582 x .5 = 1700 watts, or over two horse-power. During the first oscillation this amounts approximately to 1700 watts 1 1 3x i06 sec. = .00057 joules. The total initial energy of the System was W =-îcV2==i- x .00022 x 10 6 x (20,000)2=.044 joules, htnee Z Z 00057 1 * 1-=^th of the entire energy is lost during one oscillation, in the ground connection alone. If the ground wire were replaced by four smaller wires of the same aggregate cross-section, this loss would be halved. * See Hertz, Electric Waves, trans. by D. E. Jones, p. 150; also, H. M. Macdonald, Electric Waves, p. 76.THE G ROUX DE D OSCILLATOR. 147 We hâve seen (p. 134) that the potential is dépendent on the length of the spark, and that this is limited by the ability of the current flowing across the gap to keep the spark hot and afford a path of low résistance for the oscil- lations. With the increasing capacity of the oscillator this trouble disappears; indeed, with verv powerful sparks, the other extreme is reached, and the difficulty is to keep the spark cool. The air in the gap, and also tlie terminais themselves, get so hot that the gap has not time to recover - ~\7j 9> 9 A MA MM A 9^ Htgggtütimi VÔW'iV'ib'iSVé Fig. 77.— A high-frequeney transformer, as constructed by Prof. Elihu Thomson. P is the primary winding, S the secondary, and T a glass tube separating the two. V is a vessel of oil in which the coils are immersed, and G G are glass or rubber bushings for further insulating the terminais. its insulating character between the successive discharges of the induction coil. Hence, it is impossible to charge the oscillator to a high potential, and the spark dégénér- âtes into a continuons flaming arc, quite useless for pro- ducing oscillations. This trouble may be avoided by “ blowing out ” the arc with an air blast or a magnet ; but148 WIRELESS TELEGRAPHY. as it is encountered only with high-power apparatus, we shall pass it by for the présent. In ordinary cases the potential is limited mainly by mechanical considérations, in building and insulating high- voltage apparatus, hence it is often désirable to raise the potential of the antenna above that occurring at the spark- gap. The most usual and verv effective wav of doing this, is by means of an air-core trans- former or “ Tesla coil.” (See Fig. 77.) This is an induction coil or transformer made with- out iron; both primary and secondary coils are wound with only a fevT turns of thick wire, and the whole is im- mersed in oil, to insulate it against the enormous différ- ences of potential which occur between adjacent parts of the windings. The primary winding is connected, through a spark- gap, across the terminais of a strongly-insulated con- denser, such as a battery of Leyden jars, and the latter is charged by an induction coil or other source of high voltage, and allowed to discharge across the gap. (Fig. 78.) As soon as the spark occurs, oscillations are set up in the primary winding, as in the case of Feddersen’s experiments, (p. 22). These, by virtue of their high fre- quency, hâve a very powerful inductive effect on the Fig. 78. — Transmitting appa- ratus with high-frequency trans- former. P is the primary of the transformer, whose circuit is closed through the condenser C and spark- gan G; S, the secondary, connected to the antenna A and to ground, and I the induction coil.THE GROÜNDED OüCILLATOR. 149 secondary, and thus it is possible to step up the voltage to a degree far greater than that indicated by the simple ratio of turns of the primary and secondary windings. One terminal of the secondary winding is connected to ground and the other to the antenna, which is thus charged to a much higher potential than that which occurs at the spark-gap. To obtain the best resuit s, the two circuits should be “ tuned,” so that they both perforai free oscillations of the same period; but as this subject wdll be treated more fully in the chapter on Sélective Signaling, we shall postpone considération of it until then. 3. The Induction Coil.— The development of the an- tenna, and its increasing size and capacity, brought with them the demand for more powerful apparatus for charg- ing the oscillator. With the small oscillators of Hertz and his followers, an ordinary induction coil was quite suffi- eient* but the new devices imposed new requirements which the old-fashioned coils are inadéquate to meet. The standard induction coil of the laboratory grew out of the demand for long sparks and high voltages, and a coil was rated aecording to the length of spark it could generate, with little regard to other considérations. The resuit is a coil with a slender iron core and primary, sur- rounded by a prodigious amount of secondary wire of the smallest size that can be wound and handled. This is pre- cisely what is not wanted for wireless telegraph work. We hâve seen that very long sparks are not désirable; a one-inch spark is ample for sending messages a hundred miles or more with a plain antenna, and even for long- distance work the tendency is to use short sparks and increase the radiation by other means. The attempt to150 WIRELESS TELEGRAPHY. use the old standard coils for such service is much like trying to drive a steam engine by liquid air, let out of a pressure cylinder through a tiny orifice. The pressure is there, and, it may be, the energy ; but by the time the air reaches the piston, most of its power is lost, So a coil with a long and fine secondary, of enormous self-induction and résistance, is sluggish in its action — it takes a con- sidérable fraction of a second to give up its energy. After the antenna is once charged and the spark occurs, ail the energy remaining in the coil is wasted, and goes onlv to heating the air-gap and its spark-terminals, and spoiling its insulation for the next spark. What is wanted is a coil which gives a large amount of energy at a moderate voltage, and yields it up quickly; giving the pendulum, as it were, a quick, powerful shove and letting go. Now the energy available for each dis- charge is ail stored in the magnetized iron core before the primary circuit is broken, and is thence transferred, through the secondary, to the antenna, with greater or less rapidity, according to the résistance and inductance of the circuit and the capacity of the antenna. The outcome of these various considérations is a coil having a core of ample cross-section and moderate length, with a secondary of comparatively few turns of coarse wire, so wound as to secure the maximum effect from the magnetism of the core. Such a coil will give a clean, snappy spark at a high rate of interruption, where another having many times the weight of wire would refuse to work above a dozen breaks per second. An y attempt to increase the speed of the break would resuit in a hot, flaming arc, wasting energy, and useless for producing radiation.THE GROÜXDED OSCILLATOR. 151 The influence of the rate of interruption on the possible speed of signaling is too manifest to require comment. 4. High-power Generators.— Where a still greater sup- ply of power is required, the induction coil is often re~ placed by a high-voltage transformer, operated by an altemating current generator. This arrangement lias many advantages, not least of which is the doing away with the primary interrupter or vibrator — an apparatus Fig. 79.— Transmitting apparatus fed by an A-C generator D. whose voltage is stepped up by a transformer T. A condenser, C, of large ca- pacity compared to the antenna, is connected in a local circuit, C G L, coupled to the antenna through the inductance coil L. whieh gives much trouble when c-alled upon to handle any considérable amount of power, notwithstanding the many ingenious shapes that it has taken in the process of adap- tation to various classes of work. A typical form of this class of transmitters is that used bv the DeForest Wireless Telegraph Co. (See Fig. Y9.) The voltage of an ordinarv commercial alternator is stepped up to, say, 25,000 volts by an oil-insulated trana-152 WIRELESS TELEGRAPHY. former, whose secondary is connected to the terminais of the spark-gap. The spark-gap is not included directly in the antenna circuit, for this has not sufficient capacity to absorb ail the energy of the alternator at the voltage used ; but the current is fed into a condenser of larger capacity, included in a branch circuit containing an inductance, which is also made part of the antenna circuit. The two circuits thus interconnected vibrate together, the energy of the condenser being fed to the antenna as the energy of the latter is radiated. Usually the antenna circuit must conta in an additional inductance to make its period the sanie as that of the branch circuit, its capacity being less. It is convenient to combine the two inductances in one coil having several terminais to facilitate tuning, as shown in the figure, in which case the apparatus approaches very closely the arrangement described on page 148, wliere a transformer was used to couple the closed oscillating cir- cuit to the antenna. Indeed this doubly-connected coil is practically a transformer, in which the same wire plays the part of both primary and secondary windings. With such a high-power generator, the energy that mav be applied to the oscillator is practically unlimited, and the ability of the latter to receive it may be increased al- most indefinitely by the use of condensers of sufficient size. The trouble cornes in handling the energy at the spark-gap, and causing the discharge to maintain its oscil- latory character, despite the tendency to heat and form an arc. Air-blasts, magnetic blow-outs, and multiple spark- gaps hâve ail been used with varying degrees of success, in the effort to keep the spark cool.THE GROUNDED OSCILLATOR. 153 A particularly effective device due to Prof. Fleming* is shown in Fig. 80. An alternating-current generator of, say, 25 k\v. capacity feeds a step-up transformer, T0, by which its voltage is raised to 20,000 v. The shaft of the altemator carries, or is geared to, a radial arm whose end passes close to two metallic sectors, set at diametricaUy opposite points. The arm is set in such a position that it cornes opposite to one of the sectors, B0, when the voltage is Fig. 80.— High-power generator of Prof. Fleming. D is an altemator, feeding a step-up transformer T0. R is a rotating arm driven by the alter- na tor shaft, and passing close to the sectors BoB,. Tj and T2 are air- core transformers, Cj and C2 the primary and secondary condensers, G and air-gap, and A the antenna. The low-frequency oscillations of the nrimary oscillating circuit, CjRBjPj, excite the secondary oscillating circuit, C2GP2, whose high-frequency oscillations charge the antenna A. a maximum, and a spark leaping across charges a condenser of large capacity, Ct, to practically the full voltage of the transformer. When the arm has made a half révolution and reached a position opposite the second sector, P1? an- * See Eng. pat. No. 18,865. Application filed Oct. 22, 1900.154 WIRELESS TELEGRAPHY. other spark occurs, whereby the condenser is discharged throngh the primary of an air-core transformer, T1? and oscillations are produced which are again stepped-up to a still higher voltage. As the capacity of the condenser Ci must be very large to absorb the whole output of the generator, these oscilla- tions are of comparatively low frequency — say 10,000 per second — too slow to be used directly for radiation by an antenna ; so they are employed as a secondary source of power, to excite a secondary oscillating System, consisting in a spark-gap, G, a condenser, C2, and a second air-core transformer, T2, whose secondary is connected to the antenna and to ground. When the condenser C> is charged to a potential high enough to break down the air- gap, a powerful spark occurs, and a new set of oscillations is started with a high frequency, depending on the capacity and inductance of this second circuit and independent of the frequency of the primary oscillation. This capacity and inductance are made small, so that the secondary cir- cuit may be tuned to the natural period of the antenna, and thus the maximum efficiency of radiation be secured. The energy of this secondary oscillation is much greater than it could be made by any of the ordinary means. We shall see (p. 215) that the secondary voltage of an oscilla- tion transformer such as Ti may be much higher than that which would be indicated by the simple ratio of tums, for the ratio of the capacities, Ci: C2, is also an important factor. Thus, notwithstanding the small capacity of the condenser C2 (.02 microfarad as against 0.5 mf. for C1? in a case cited bv Prof. Fleming), the increased voltage en- ables it to absorb most of the energy of the latter, and make it effective in radiation.THE GROÜXDED OSCILLATOR. 155 This apparatus is used by Marconi for transatlantic work. Its radiation has the advantage, not only of great energy, but also of small damping and correspondingly small intensity. Thus its signais may be detected by an apparatus two thousand miles away, properly tuned to receive them, while passing unnoticed by the untuned in- struments on vessels in between. We shall see more of this in Chapter VI.CHAPTEE IV. PROPAGATION OF GROTJNDEOD WAVES. 1. Three Hypothèses Suggested.— We hâve seen that the waves emitted by a Hertzian oscillator are polar- ized transverse vibrations, of essentially the same nature as light, but enormously greater wave-length ; that they travel ordinarily in straight lines, but are subject to re- flection, refraction, diffraction, etc., precisely like ordinary light. Are the radiations of a grounded antenna of the same nature, and subject to the saine laws, or hâve they some peculiar properties which set thern apart from the free Hertzian waves which we hâve been considering? The answer to this question is of great practical im- portance to the wireless telegrapher, as it will go a long way toward determining his ability to surmount ob- stacles in the path of his waves. To dodge a little hill or a group of houses is a simple matter of diffraction when the wave-length is great, but to cross a mountain range or the hill of water due to the curvature of the earth is quite another matter. The curvature of the earth is a con- sidérable factor, even in comparatively short transmis- sions — a distance of forty miles between stations being sufficient to put the highest masts below the horizon — yet it is now an every-day matter to send signais for hun- dreds or even thousands of miles. How can we explain this ? [156]PROPAGATION OF GROUXDFD WAVES. 157 Three hypothèses hâve been offered to explain the propa- gation of signais from an antenna : — lst. That they are free waves in the ether, exactly like those studied by Hertz, except for their wave-length. 2d. That ether waves hâve little to do with the case, except to waste energy bv shooting into space ; but that the signais are transmitted by alternating currents in the earth or sea. 3d. That there are electric waves of a peculiar char- acter, which glide over the conducting surface, following its curves as a rain drop follows a window-pane. Xone of these ideas are absurd, and we must call upon experimental facts to décidé between them. 2. The Free-Wave Hypothesis.— Take first the hy- pothesis of free waves. There are four ways in which such a wave may pass an obstacle : by passing through it, by diffraction around it, bv reflection or refraction by sur- rounding objects. The first involves the conductivity of the obstacle — we know that a conductor is opaque to the waves, while a dielectric is transparent. Xow, sea-water, though a good conductor for slowly-varying currents, is quite transparent to light; and even with waves a million times longer, such as are produced by the smaller Hertzian oscillators, it acts as a more or less perfect dielectric. ( See p. 83.) But the waves used in wireless telegraphv, at a frequency of a million cycles per second, are several hun- dred times longer still, and Prof. J. J. Thomson has shown conclusively that, at these frequencies, sea water is a good conductor, and hence quite opaque to such waves.* So, if we are to accept the “ free-wave ” hypothesis, we must find * See J. J. Thomson, Proc. Roy. Soc. 45, p. 269, 1889.358 WIRELESS TELEGRAPHY. a way to get around tlie surface of the océan, not through it. Diffraction lias been suggested, but we must remember tliat the amount of déviation dépends upon the relation of the wave-length to the sharpness of the diffracting edge. M. Gouy, in his experiments on the diffraction of light bv the edge of a very keen razor, obtained remarkable dévia- tions (p. 96) ; but here the thickness of the edge was com- parable to the wave-length of light. The waves that we are dealing with are to the earth as light waves are to a sphere one inch in diameter, and it is difficnlt to conceive of such an extreme case of diffraction in the light of our présent knowledge. A gain, diffuse reflection may be considered, as we see it in the afterglow when the sun lias sunk below the horizon. But here, the sun?s rays are reflected from material parti- cles, large in proportion to the wave-length, suspended in the air. As the diameter of the particles approaches the wave-length of the light, the reflection becomes less and less perfect. The longer waves are naturally the first to be affected ; thus, on a perfectly clear day when the suspended particles are very minute, the longer red and yellow rays are scarcely reflected at ail, and the sky looks blue, on account of the prépondérance of the shorter waves. Where are the material bodies in the upper air large enough to reflect waves 1,000 feet long ? Clouds will not do, for a fog-bank is found to be quite transparent. The water which composes the fog and clouds, even if itself a conductor, is concentrated in minute globules separated bv insulating air, so the cloud as a whole acts as a good dielectric. Sonie think that the rarified upper strata of the air are suffîciently good conductors to reflect the waves,PROPAGATION OF GROÜNDED WAVES. 130 as the sound of a distant thunder-clap is drawn out into a long roar, but this remains to be proved, and the trend of experimental evidence is against it. Then there is refraction. But at- mospheric refraction is not sufficient to carry light any considérable distance around the globe, and the spécifie in- ductive capacity of air is not large enough to indicate any great différence in the index of refraction for long elec- tric waves. (See p. 79.) Finally we hâve the experimental fact that the transmission of waves from a free oscillator has never been successful over long distances, notwith- standing the many attempts at concen- trating them by mirrors, etc., whereas the radiations from a grounded an- tenna travel indefinitely over the sea with no appréciable loss in intensity beyond tliat which is accounted for by the atténuation of the waves through spreading out over constantly-widening areas. The free-wave hypothesis does not account for this. atin^nne^show dfsatH- 3. The Altemating-Current Hypothesis. SîEi °tfhe ^nsity J i ofeurrent. N N, nodes, — Consider now the second explana- l, îoop. tion : that alternating currents are set up in the earth, flowing in and out of the antenna, and that these currents travel through the ground, themselves giving rise to the signal at the receiving station without the aid of ether waves. Fig. 81.—Vibration of160 WIRELESS TELEGRAPHY. That such currents exist is undeniable. We may look upon a grounded antenna as half of a Tlertzian oscillator, such as is shown in Fig. 81. We hâve learned that the ends of an oscillator are nodal points, where the potential varies but there is no current, while at the spark-gap in the middle there is a loop, where currents surge back and forth but there is no change of potential. If we take away the lower half of the oscillator and in its place put an infinité Fig. 82.— Vibration of grounded oscillator. Distribution of potential and current as in Fig. 81, but currents spread out in conducting plane. conducting plane, the oscillations will go on as before ; the point where the oscillator meets the plane will still be a loop, and the currents wfill surge in and out, losing them- selves in the conducting surface. (Fig. 82.) The same is true of a sonorous tube containing a vibrat- ïng column of air. (Fig. 83.) If the tube be closed at both ends, the vibrations will surge back and forth with a node at each end and a loop in the middle. If we eut the tube in two, leaving the eut ends open, each half willPROPAGATION OF GROUNDED WAVES. 161 vibrato precisely as before, with a node at the closed end and a loop at the open one, and currents of air will rush in and out of the open end. (Fig. 84.) But are the currents which radiate in ail directions from the oscillator sufficient to account for the signais received at a distance? Unquestionably there is also a large Fig. 83.— Vibration of air column in tube closed at both ends. Nodes at ends, loop in middle. amount of energy given out in ether waves, for a receiver placed near the oscillator is affected, whether it be grounded or not. If these ether waves travel outward in straight lines, we should expect the intensity of the signal to fall off rapidly when the distance becomes so great that the earth cuts off the direct radiation ; but this is not the Fig. 84.— The same tube eut in two, with ends left open. Each half vibrâtes as before, and air currents rush in and out of the open ends. case : the atténuation follows the same law, however great the distance. Again, if a coherer be placed in a hole in the ground, it will operate when uncovered ; but if the hole be filled with earth, the oscillations produce no effect.* * See Poincaré, Notice sur la Télégraphie sans Fil, Ann. du Bur. des Long. 1002, Notice A, p. 12. 11 L N162 WIRELESS TELEGRAPHY. We must look for something more than earth currents to explain the phenomena. Yet there is evidence that the conductivity of the sur- face over which the radiations pass has a marked effect on their atténuation. The transmission is very much better over sea than over land, and some kinds of land are better than others: dry, sandy ground gives very poor trans- Fig. 85.— The electrostatic field about a charged Hertzian oscillator just before the air-gap breaks down and the oscillations commence. The “ lines of force ” indicate the direction of the displacement in the ether, and hence the stress or “ electric force ” which accompanies it. Each line may be considered the axis of a Faraday tube of induction. mission, while a rich, fertile soil is much better. Again, the same line may work better at one time than at another : when the soil is moist the transmission is good, but when it is dry or frozen the signais are much weaker. In short, a good conducting surface is favorable to the transmission of signais, while a poor conducting surface is not. Thus we are forced to the conclusion that, although the dis-PROPAGATION OF GROUNDED WAVES. 163 turbance really has its seat in the ether, it is very closely connected with the surface over which it glides. 4. Propagation of Free Waves.— Let us now look again at the principles which underlie etheric disturbances, and see if there is any way in which they may be caused to follow a conducting surface. First we must review the action of an ordinary Hertzian oscillator. Take, for simplicity, a straight wire, interrupted in the middle by a spark-gap. (Fig. 85.) Suppose the two knobs which constitute the spark-gap to be suddenly con- nected to a source of constant high potential, not quite sufficient to break down the air-gap. A current flows from the knobs toward the ends of the apparatus, and con- tinues until both conductors are completely charged. But the current does not stop at the surface of the conductors ; it takes the form of a System of displacement currents, flowing ont through the ether, and forming loops from end to end of the oscillator, thus completing the circuit. While these currents are flowing the ether is being strained, and when finally the condition of equilibrium is reached and the currents cease to flow, the whole medium is in a state of electrostatic stress. If we explore the field with a small electrified body and plot, from point to point, the direction in which it tends to move, we get a sériés of curves such as are shown in the figure. These “ lines of electric force/’ we should remember, represent the dis- placement in the ether, whose behavior is analogous to that of an elastic solid ; it tends to move back to the position of equilibrium with a force proportional to the displace- ment To give the idea a little more concrète form, let us1G4 WIRELESS TELEGRAPHY. imagine, as Faraday did, that each of these lines is the axis of a “ tube of force/’ or, more accurately, a “ tube of induction,” wliose cross-section varies from place to place, so that the whole electrostatic field is filled with these tubes, starting at one side of the os- cillator and ending at the other. Each tube may thus be consid- ered, apart from the others, as a closed volume in which the displacement has occurred, form- ing part of the circuit through the conductor. The total in- duction or “ electric flux ” (as we may call it on account of its analogy to a magnetic flux), across any section of this tube, is constant, and equal to the total intégral current which has flowed in that part of the conductor which com- plétés its circuit — that is, to the charge on the surface of the conductor in which the tube terminâtes.* (See Fig. 86.) Here we must guard against a too literal interprétation of the figure, and remember that the assumption of the * Owing to the unfortunate choice of units in our C. G. S. System, it is necessary to introduce here the constant factor 4^, but this does not affect the principle involved. With a suitable choice of units the factor would disappear. Fig. 86.— A portion of the oscillator, Fig. 85, en- larged, showing a single Faraday tube. The tube terminâtes in opposite charges, +Q and —Q. on the surface, equal to the inté- gral value of the current which supplied these charges, and also to the induction, cr “ electric flux ” across any section of the tube.*PROPAGATION OF GROUNDËD WAVES. 1G5 Faraday tubes is simply an arbitrary convention, which puts into concrète form the broad principles which we are studying. The mathematical analysis from which these principles are derived involves no such arbitrary assump- tions — they are introduced simply to give tangible form to the unknown something represented by Maxwell’s équa- tions, so that we may trace its actions and détermine its properties. With this understanding we may go a step farther, and assume that the tubes hâve an individual existence, apart from the space which they embrace ; that they may travel from place to place ; and that any change in the intensity of an electrostatic field is due to the motion or distortion of the tubes, which are themselves indestructible; and each unit tube is of constant strength, measured by a unit positive electrical charge at one end and a unit négative charge at the other. Thus an open-ended tube always be- gins and ends on matter; though, under certain circum- stances, as we shall see presently, a portion of a tube may form a loop, which becomes detached and goes ofï into space, closed on itself. This concrète conception of the tubes as individuals is similar to the considération of vortex motion in fluids. A vortex ring, for instance, is simply a State of disturbance in the air; but if we look upon it as a concrète entity, we find that it possesses inertia, elasticity, etc., and we see that two rings may collide and rebound, aud may exhibit many other properties of material bodies. Furthermore, a vortex filament must either be closed on itself or must end at the bounding surface of the fluid, just as our Fara- day tubes do.IGG WIRELESS TELEGRAPHY. So also our Faraday tubes possess certain peculiar properties, and a complété mathematical analysis of the subject shows that nearly ail, if not ail, electrical phe- nomena may be explained by a considération of their actions. In the first place, thev possess inertia. Not oniy does a tube represent a sup- ply of potential energy, due to the strained condition of the ether which it em- braces, but it may also pos- sess kinetic energy due to its velocity. This kinetic energy is closely allied to the energy of the magnetic fïeld, for a Faraday tube, when in motion, is always ac- companied by a magnetic force perpendicular to the tube and to its direction of motion, and this magnetic force, as we already know, represents a stock of kinetic energy. Furthermore, the tubes act and react upon each other; similar tubes, i. e., tubes of the same sign, repel each other, while opposite tubes attract each other ; and each tube has a tendency to contract in the direction of its length. Tlius, two similarly charged spheres are mutually repellant, and the similar tubes emitted by each radiate into space (Fig. 87), while oppositely charged conductors are drawn to- gether, by virtue of the tension of the tubes which spring across from one to the other.* (Fig. 88.) Fig. 87.— Illustrating the mutual repulsion of the similar. Faraday tubes emanating from similarly charged bodies. i. e.. the tendency of the tubes to expand laterally. *For a more complété discussion of the properties of Faraday tubes, see J. J. Thomson, Recent Researches in Electricity and Mag- ne tiam, Chap. I.PROPAGATION OF GROÜXDED WAVES. 167 Now let us apply these principles to our oscillator. We hâve the conductors charged, and the Faraday tubes form- ing bridges through space from one to the other. Now let the air-gap break down and a sudden current rush across f ^^ \ from conductor to conductor. \ \ / \ / j This means that the opposite y charges on the two conduct- ors move toward each other, / /\ carrving with them the oppo- ' / Vx ^J \ ' site ends of their Faraday l ----^ I tubes. This gives the tubes ' draw up to the conductors, leaving a vacant space, as it were, into which the longer tubes are forced vertically by the pressure of others out- side; or, what amounts to the same thing, the opposite sides of the loops are drawn together by their mutual at- traction, so that the tubes take a pear-shape, and the sides finally meet and coalesoe. The outer loops of the tubes then separate and go off by themselves, repelled by the inner portions, which now draw up to the oscillator until their ends meet. But the tubes do not disappear and go out of existence when their ends corne together — their inertia carries them on, their terminal charges separate, and tliey again expand until the conductors are charged once more with reversed polarities. Then the same thing is repeated, the tubes again contract, and again a sériés of closed loops are sent off, carrying with them a part of the energy of the oscillation. nearest to the oscillator the opportunity to contract and Fig. 88.— Oppositely charged bodies attract each other : i. e., the Faraday tubes tend to con- tract in the axial direction.168 WIRELESS TELEGRAPHY. In Figs. 89 to 92, we may trace the progress of the oscillation through a complété cycle, at intervals of an Fig. 89.— The field of electric force about a rectilinear oscillation (after Hertz) at the moment t = 0 (conductors discharged). The oscii- lator is shown in the center, drawn to scale, and each line of the field represents the axis of a unit Faraday tube. The closed loops indicate a detached wave just starting outward. Fig. 90.— The field about the oscillator after an eighth period (t = VsT). The conductors are becoming charged and Faradav tubes are spread- ing out from them, filling the région within the circle Kj. eighth period, as worked out mathematically by Hertz;* See Hertz, Electric Waves, Eng. trans. p. 141 et seq.PROPAGATION OF GROUNDED WAVES. 169 the lines of force in the diagrams representing the axes of our unit Faraday tubes. Fig. 89 represents the state of Fig. 91.— For time t^r^T. The conductors are now fully charged, the circle has enlarged to R2, and the tubes hâve expanded to fill it. Fig. 92.— For t =: % T. The conductors are discharging, the loops are expanding and flattening, and the wave is beginning to be detached. When t increases to % T, the wave will take the form shown in Fig. 89. (In Hertz’s notation, X dénotés the half wave-length.) affairs when the conductors are completely discharged, and ail the energy of the oscillation is in the form of current — no tubes of force proceed from the oscillator. Fig. 90170 1VIRELESS TELEGRAPHY. shows the conditions an eighth-period la ter, and the Unes within the circle represent the growing electrostatic field. In Fig. 91 the circle has expanded, and the lines hâve spread out to fill it : the current is now zéro, and the whole energy of the oscillation is represented by the electrostatic field within the circle. In Fig. 92 the current has reversed, and the tubes begin to contract into a pear-shape — alreadv one of thein has formed a detached loop, which is commenc- ing its outward joumey, while the inner portion is shrink- ing back to the oscillator. We now reach the end of a half-period, and the condi- tions are the same as they were at the beginning, though reversed, and if we reverse the arrows which show the di- rection of the displacement in the ether, Fig. 89 will cor- rectly represent the new State of affairs : the Faraday tubes hâve ail withdrawn into the oscillator, leaving behind a nuinber of detached loops, which are expanding through their mutual repulsion and beginning to travel outward. In Fig. 90 the reversed set of tubes are beginning to ex- pand, forcing the detached wave outward, and flattening it on its inner side. So it travels on with the velocity of light, followed by another and another, each expanding laterally into a crescent-shape as it goes, until finally, at a great distance from the oscillator, the tubes of induction form almost perfect semicircles with their common center at the oscillator ; in other words, a spherical wave-front. Thus far we hâve considered only the electrostatic field which goes with the waves. How about the magnetic field ? This follows simply from the law that a moving Faraday tube always produces a magnetic force perpendicular to it- self and to its direction of motion. Thus the lines of mag- netic force will form closed circles with their centers inPROPAGATION OF GROUNDEU WAVES. 171 the axis of the oscillator, expanding as the waves travel outward, always remaining perpendicular to the Faraday tubes and forming parallels of a sériés of conoentric spheres of which the Faraday tubes, or electrostatic lines, are the meridians. (See also p. 76.) The energy of.the wave is thus half electrostatic and half magnetic, just as in a water wave the energy is part potential, due to the élévation of the crest and the dépréssion of the trough, and part kinetic, due to the outward motion of these crests and troughs. (See p. 122.) This distribution of magnetic force does not apply to the région immediately surrounding the oscillator, for here the magnetic field due to the currents in the oscillator itself is superimposed on that due to the expanding wave: for example, when the conductors are discharged and the tubes hâve ail withdrawn into the oscillator (Fig. 89), the mag- netic force is not zéro, but is very large -— the current is a maximum, and the whole energy of the oscillation is in the magnetic field close about the oscillator. But these limit- ing conditions do not concern us here, as we onlv hâve to deal with the waves at a considérable distance from tlieir source, where the effects of direct induction hâve given place to pure radiation. Here there is a real transfer of energy in the direction of propogation, as in the case of progressive water waves, where élévation and velocity oc- cur together; but near the oscillator the conditions ap- proaeh more nearly those of stationary waves in a closed vessel, where élévation alternâtes with velocity, and the energy simply oscillâtes between the potential and kinetic forms without being transmitted through space.* * This transition from stationary to progressive waves may be illus- trated by the hvdraulic model, Fig. 65, p. 122. Directly over the dis-172 WIRELESS TELE G RAP H Y. These are free waves in space — the peculiar discovery of Hertz — traveling outward with the velocity of light in ever-expanding spheres. The direction of propagation must always be perpendicular to the wave-front, i. e., to the plane of the Faraday tubes and the lines of magnetic force, hence the disturbance travels radially in straight lines, like light, Indeed we know that it is practicallv polarized light of immensely magnified wave-length. 5. Propagation of Guided Waves—Now suppose the whole System to be divided into two symmetrical halves by an infinité sheet of conducting material, passing through the center of the oscillator. (See Fig. 85.) This plane, being cverywhere équidistant from the oppositelv charged ends of the oscillator, is a plane of zéro potential ; as ail the Faraday tubes eut it at right angles, no electromotive forces are induced in it ; the opposite electrical charges on its opposite faces due to the impinging of the Faraday tubes, being infinitely close together, neutralize each other, and the résultant is zéro — indeed, everything goes on as if the plane wrere not there. Again, suppose the lower half of the System to be re- moved. The oscillator will vibrate as before (see p. 160) ; currents will surge into and out of the plane, i. ethe Fara- charge pipe the crest simply rises and falls, velocity alternating with élévation. To use the familiar alternating current terminology, the velocity and pressure are in quadrature, and the vibration is “ wattless,” so to speak. The wave is stationary. At a distance from the source the crests move outward and the troughs move inward, the velocity and pressure are in phase, and power is transmitted hy the progressive wave. So, near the oscillator the electric force and the magnetic force are in quadrature, and represent energy at rest — the inhérent energy of the oscillation —; at a distance they are in phase, and represent a transmis- sion of power.PROPAGATION OF GROUNDED WAVES. 173 day tubes which now terminate in the plane carry their charges to and froni the oscillator as they move in and out ; the tubes which are detached travel outward as before, carrying their charges with them. These moving charges constitute a sériés of alternating conduction currents in the plane,* completing the circuits of the displacement cur- rents in the dielectric which, we know, accompany the mov- ing Faraday tubes. Thus the half-wraves travel on, pre- cisely as if the other halves were présent. Xow suppose the conducting sheet to be curved. A per- fect conductor is, by définition, one in which only vanish- ingly small electric forces can exist, Ilence there can be no tangential component of the electric force, and the tubes of induction must ahvays be perpendicular to the surface. If, then, the surface be curved, the Faraday tubes must accommodate themselves to the curvature, and the wave, whose direction of propagation is always perpendicular to the tubes, will follow the surface, as illustrated in Fig. 93. If this is not évident, imagine for the moment that the tubes do impinge obliquely on the curved sheet. This in- volves the production of an electromotive force in the sur- face, hence a current will flow. This means that the charges at the ends of the tubes are moving with a velocity different from that due to the normal progress of the wave, and thus the grounded ends of the tubes move more or * The experimental proof of the équivalence of a moving charge to an electric current was one of the masterpieces of the late Prof. Henry Rowland. He showed that a rapidly rotating dise carrying cliarged con- ductors on its periphery caused a deflectionof a sensitive magnetic needle suspended near by, and that the magnitude of the effect agreed substan- tially with that demanded by the theory. The effect is very minute, and has escaped other less skillful experimenters.174 W IRE LE 8 S TELEGRAPHY. less rapidlv than their upper parts, according to the direc- tion of the curvature, nntil they again become normal to the surface and the currents cease. This explains the ob- served fact that the currents in the earth are greater when the wave travels up or down hill than when it follows a level surface. If the guiding surface is not a perfect conductor, which is actually the case in practice, an electromotive force is Fig. 93.— Propagation of grounded waves from an antenna over a curved surface. necessary to overcome the ohmic résistance and produce the altemating currents in the surface. Hence the Faraday tubes are distorted and strike the surface obliquely, giv- ing up part of their energy to supply the ohmic losses in the surface. Thus we see why the conductivity of the sur- face has such an important influence on the atténuation of the waves. Where the conductivity is perfect the atténuation de-PROPAGATION OF GROUNDED WAVES. 175 pends simply upon the distance from the source. The number of tubes in each wave remains constant as the wave expands, but the cross-section of each tube continually in- creases to fill the space at its disposai — not in a radial direction, for the waves follow each other at constant velocity and hence the distance between them is always the same — but in a direction parallel to the wave-front. The cross-section of a tube thus increases directly as the dis- tance from the source. Now the “ displacement,” or induc- tion per unit area, in the ether contained within a tube is inversely proportional to the cross-section of the tube, for the total induction, or electric flux, across any cross-section is constant ; hence the electric force, which is proportional to the displacement, varies inversely as the distance from the source, and the energy of the field, inversely as the square of the distance. This is the resuit given on page 129. In a similar wav we may explain Hertz’s discovery that most of the energy is concentrated near the équatorial plane, instead of being distributed equally in ail direc- tions as in the case of ordinary light.* Only a few of the Faraday tubes stretch out to any considérable distance from this plane — most of them bend around and reverse their direction within a comparatively short distance, as shown in Fig. 93. Hence those that do extend their cres- cent-shaped loops toward the pôles hâve proportionately more space to fill, and their energy is distributed and at- tenuated. To reproduce the uniform distribution of ordi- nary light, we should need an infinité number of oscillators, oriented in ail directions. Electric Waves, Eng. trans., p. 143.176 WIRELESS TELEGRAPHY. Finally, we see that each of the three hypothèses we hâve considered has some foundation in fact, though the last is the only one that is adéquate to explain ail the phe- nomena: in short, the grounded waves are really of the saine essential character as free Hertzian waves, and they are accompanied by alternating currents in the guiding plane, but they are distinguished by their inséparable con- nection with the surface over which they glide. If we imagine the extreme case where the guiding surface is con- tracted and bent into a long, narrow cylinder, we shall hâve the propagation along a wire discussed in Chapter YI of Part One. In this case the wrave becomes a plane tr ans verse one, whose amplitude does not diminish with increasing distance, except as the energy is wasted in ohmic and other losses. 6. Effect of Daylight on Wave Transmission.—An in- teresting phenomenon has been observed by Marconi in his experiments with long-distance transmission.* It is found that, under similar conditions, the signais trans- mitted between two stations are much stronger at night than in the daytime. The high-power station at Poldhu, for example, may be sending out signais which are easily received by a vessel in midocean, while it is night; but as soon as the sun rises over England the intensitv of the signais begins to wane, and in full daylight the différ- ence is very marked. This striking effect has not yet been thoroughly ex- plained, but it calls up many interesting suggestions. Hertz observed (p. 36) that a spark-gap breaks down much more readily when exposed to ultra-violet light from See paper before Royal Society, June 12, 1902.PROPAGATION OF GROUXDED WAVES. 177 another spark tlian it does when not so exposed. This may be explained on the hypothesis, which is daily gain- ing weight through the experiments of many noted in- vestigators, that nltra-violet light has the power of “ionizing” a gas, or splitting np some of its molécules into smaller bodies, or “ ions.” The ions are not elec- trically neutral, as normal molécules or atoms are, but carry equal and opposite electrical chargée. These charges, before their séparation, neutralized each other and so were unobserved, but now they are free to move under the in- fluence of any electrostatic stress. An analogous effect occurs in an electrolytic cell. Pure water does not conduct electricity; but if it contain in solution a trace of hydrochloric acid, for example, it conducts readily. In the act of dissolving, some of the molécules of acid are supposed to split up into oppositely charged ions, or électrons, and these, by their motion, con- stitue a current through the solution. If now we postulate a similar splitting up of the atoms of air into oppositely charged ions,* under the influence of sunlight, we may explain the anomalous atténuation of electromagnetic waves. Under the influence of the electrostatic stresses which accompany the waves, the op- positely charged ions will move in opposite directions, and by their motion will produce what is practically a conduction current, or more strictly a convection cur- rent, in the air, just as the ions of electrolysis are the * J. J. Thomson has shown that the cathode discharge of a vacuum tube consists in negatively-charged “ corpuscles,” whose mass is a small fraction of that of a hydrogen atom, and similar bodies occur in free gases. See J. J. Thomson, Proc. Roy. Inst., 1901, p. 574; also PMI. Mag., March, 1903. 12178 WIRELESS TELEGRAPHY. seat of the current in an electrolyte. Such currents will fritter away the energy of the wave, in the same way as the convection of heat from the warm compressed portions of a Sound wave to the cooler rarified portions results in a dis- sipation of energy, and an atténuation of the sound. This explanation should not be taken as final, but it is at least suggestive, and in harmony with the latest views regarding the ionization of gases.CHAPTER Y. THE RECEIVING APPARAJTTJS. 1. Detectors Classified.— Since Chapter Y of Part One was written by M. Poincaré, detectors of electric waves hâve appeared in such a variety of forms that it is difficult to select from among them those that may be described in one short chapter. We shall hâve to be content with a classifi- cation according to their principles of operation, and the description of a few typical forms from each class. The detectors now in use may be séparated roughly into five groups : lst. The Microphonie. 2d. The Mechanical. 3d. The Thermal. 4th. The Electrolytic. 5th. The Magnetic. These groups are not always sharply defined, nor do they include ail possiK'e forms of detectors, but the arrange- ment is a convenient one, and covers ail the principal types that are of nractical value. 2. Microphonie Detectors.*— This Mass includes ail de- tectors of the coherer type, which Marconi has broadly and terselv defined as “ a sensitive imperfect contact.”! It has long been known that two conduoting surfaces in * The? word “Microphonie” is rather a niisnomer as applied to a detector of electric waves; but as it suggests the principle involved, it is a convenient term, in the absence of a better one. t Marconi, Eng. pat. No. 12,039, June 2, 1896. [179]180 WIRELE8S TELEGRAPHY. light contact, such as a carbon point resting on a dise of the same material, and forming part of an eleotrical circuit, are remarkably sensitive to mechanical shocks, such as the impact of sound waves. The slightest vibration of the apparatus produces marked variations in the résistance of the contact. Sir Oliver Lodge discovered that such a con- Fio. 94.—Lodge’s knob coherer, applied to Syntonie jar experiment (see p. 209). The knobs are shown at A, mounted on the same base as the bell that gives the signal. The vibration of the bell is sufficient to de- cohere the knobs. tact, was also affected bj electric waves, and devised a de- tector consisting in two knobs of métal, barely in contact (Fig. 94), and forming part of the circuit through a bat- tery and an electric bell.* Whenever this device was ex- * Lodge, Jour. Instn. of Elec. Engrs., vol. 19, p. 352, 1890. Also Signalïing through Space icithout Wires, 3d ed., p. 20.THE RECEIVING APPARATUS. 181 posed to a sudden electrical impulse, such as that produced by the discharge of a Leyden jar, the contact résistance suddenly decreased, and the bell began to ring. Lodge considers that the thin film of oxide which sépa- râtes the surfaces is broken down by the slight différence of potential between them, an infinitésimal spark occurs, and the partially fused surfaces are caused to cohere or weld together. He shows also that the cohésion is aided, if in- deed it may not be explained altogether, by the electrostatic attraction between the surfaces : for example, he calculâtes that the attraction between two surfaces separated by a film of the thickness of 10'7 cm., and differing in potential by one volt, would be equal to 4 x 107 dynes per sq. cm., or about one-third of a ton per square inch — a very consid- érable force, even where the area of the contact surfaces is small.* This explanation is quite generally accepted as applying, in substance, to the varions forms of filings coherers, of which Marconi’s coherer, described on p. 131, mav be taken as typical. Here there are a large number of imperfect contacts between the individual particles of métal, and so the chance of the apparatus failing to work is greatly re- duced, while its sensitiveness is correspondingly increased. A great drawback to the use of such detectors is the fact that their conductivity continues after the stimulus which caused it is removed, and hence some sort of tapper or mechanical decoherer is required to restore them to their sensitive condition. This is disadvantageous, not only for mechanical reasons, but also because the speed of signaling is limited on account of the time required for the tapper to * For a fuller exposition of Lodge’s ideas, see his Signalling througli Space without Wires, pp. 86-87.182 WIRELESS TELEGRAPHY. do its work. A speed of ten to fifteen words per minute is considered quite good for such devices. To obviate this difficulté, a number of self-restoring “ auto-coherers ” hâve been devised, of which the “ Italian Navy coherer,” invented by Sig. Castelli of the Royal Italian Navy,* and used successfully by the Marconi Com- Fig. 95.— Italian navy coherer. E, E' are iron or carbon électrodes, and M a globule of mercury. pany, is a specimen. (Fig. 95.) This consists in a glass tube, similax to that of a filings coherer, plugged with iron or carbon électrodes, between which is a globule of mer- cury. In a more improved form the électrodes are both of carbon, and embrace two drops of mercury separated by a short iron cylinder. (Fig. 96.) Fig. 96.— Italian navy coherer — second form. The électrodes, C C't are both of carbon, and I is an iron cylinder separating two globules of mercury. The action here is entirely automatic. The cohésion between the mercury globules and the électrodes exists only while the stimulus is acting, and the apparat-us regains its original sensitiveness as soon as the actuating cause is re- moved. See Angelo Banti, in Eîectrician, Lond., Julv 11. 1901, p. 477.THE RECEIVING APPARATUS. 183 This coherer is often used with a téléphoné in the local battery circuit (Fig. 97), instead of the relay and recorder shown in Fig. 69. When so operated it responds to very rapid impulses, and each spark of the transmitting ap- paratus produces its individual effect, instead of being merged together with others into continuons dots and dashes, as when a filings coherer is used. The resulting Fig. 97.— Connections of auto-coherer with battery B and téléphoné T. buzz which is heard in the téléphoné is easily read, and the apparatus thus becomes quite effective, especially as the téléphoné is much more sensitive than any relay and re- cording device. This arrangement is one of those used by Marconi in his mémorable transatlantic experiments,* * Marconi before Roy. Instn. See Electrician, Lond., June 27, 1903, p. 390.184 WIRELESS TELEGRAPHY. when the first “ S ” was heard across two thousand miles of océan. It has one serions drawback, however; it insists some- times on cohering permanently, and again, it will cease to act in the middle of a message. Lodge has avoided this irregularity by keeping the contact surfaces in constant motion.* He replaces one of the fixed iron électrodes with a dise of steel, which is revolved continuously by clockwork, in light contact with a drop of mercury covered with a Fig. 98.— Lodge’s auto-coherer. A Steel dise, a, rotâtes in light contact with a globule of mercury, b, from which it is normally separated by a thin film of oil. thin film of oil. (Fig. 98.) The contact surfaces are thus kept clean and fresh, and always in réceptive condition. This device is used directly in connection with a siphon recorder in the Lodge-Muirhead System, which will be dis- cussed later. The recorder, though less sensitive than a téléphoné, has the advantage of giving a permanent record * H. C. Marillier on Lodge-Muirhead System, Electrician, Lond., March 27, 1903, pp. 930-934. PlanTHE RECEIVIXG APPARATUS. 185 b' where the impulses are too feeble to affect positively the ordinary relay and recording apparatus. Coherers may be made of a great variety of materials. In certain combinations, es- pecially those involving sub- stances that are easily oxi- dized, the primary phenome- non of cohérence, or decrease in résistance, is followed by the opposite effect, and the device regains a condition of high résistance while the im- pulse is still acting. In an ex- trême case, as when carbon grains are used in place of me- tallic filings, the former effect disappears, and we find only an increase in résistance when- ever the stimulus occurs. Such de vices are called anti- coherers. The explanation of the phenomenon is somewhat obscure, though it seems prob- able that the minute sparks which occur between the grains oxidize the surfaces, and so destroy their con- ductivity.* 3. Mechanical Betectors.— Hertz, in his experiments on the propagation of waves in wires, found that a hoop of Fig. 99. — Hertz’s inductive de- tector. The hoop of aluminum wire is shown with mirrow attached, suspended within the box. The wire abb'a' carries the oscillations, which repel the currents that they induce in the hoop. * For a discussion of this subject, sec Hurmuzèscu, Annales Scient, de VUniv. de Jassy, Repr. in L’Êcl. Elec., June 27, 1903.186 WIRELE88 TELEGRAPHY. wire, suspended by a fibre in the neighborhood of a pair of conductors carrying the oscillations, tended to take up a position perpendicular to the plane of these wires. The rapidly varying currents induced secondary oscillations in the suspended hoop, and the mutual repulsion between these two sets of currents caused the hoop to swing toward the position where the action was a minimum. Hertz’s apparatus is illustrated in Fig. 99.* Similar arrangements hâve been employed by other workers for the study of the currents set up in an antenna exposed to radiations from a distance. Such devices are useful.for quantitative measurements, and give quite ac- curate results, but they are not applicable to ordinarv télé- graphie work on account of their sluggish action and the difficulty of making them sensitive. 4. Thermal Detectors.— The thermal detectors referred to on p. 43 are subject to the same objections as the me- chanical ones above mentioned: the wire whose heating is measured, however fine it may be drawn by ordinary methods, is still too coarse to be much affected by the feeble currents induced in a receiving antenna; and, even were the heating measurable, the rate of cooling would be too slow to follow the rapid succession of signais required for practical telegraphy. Recently, however, by an ingenious method, wires hâve been produced of such excessive fineness as to be free from both these troubles. A rod of silver is cast with a piece of platinum wire as a core, and the whole is drawn down to a diameter of a few thousandths of an inch. In this process the platinum is reduced to a diameter of .0001 inch or less, which is amplv fine for ail practical purposes. * See Hertz, Electric Waves, Eng. trans., p. 191.THE RECEIVING APPARATUS. 187 Of such material is the “ barretter ” of Prof. R. A. Fes- senden.* A short loop of the platinum wire is exposed by dissolving the silver casing in nitric acid, and then mounted in a metallic box to protect it from air currents and from stray electrical impulses. Connected in the circuit from the antenna. to ground, the oscillations cause it to become heated, the resulting increase in résistance causes a diminu- tion of the current in a local circuit including the loop, and a sound is produced in a téléphoné. Such a fine wire loop is sensitive to very feeble currents, and its heat is radiated so quickly that its température can follow the most rapid succession of impulses required in practice. Unfortunately, however, a loop that is fine enough to be sensitive is extremely délicate, and is easily burned out by atmospheric disturbances or by stray radia-* tion from the transmitting apparatus. 5. Electrolytic Detectors.—■ Dr. Lee de Forest. and E. H. S mythe hâve produced a detector which in volves an inter- esting principle.f It dépends for its operation on the dis- ruption of the minute metallic bridges or “ trees ” which form, under suitable conditions, between the électrodes of an electrolytic cell. The apparatus, which they call a “ re- sponder,” consists in a glass tube similar to that of a co- herer, in which are fitted two électrodes, preferably of tin, though other metals will do. The space between the élec- trodes — about l/64th inch — is filled wTith a viscous semi- eonducting liquid, such as glycérine with a small admixture of water, together with some peroxide of lead as a depolarizer, to prevent the excessive évolution of gas. When this cell is connected across a batterv of suitable * See U. S. pat. 706,744, Au g. 12, 1902. t See U. S. pat. 716,000, Dec. 16, 1902.188 W IRE LE 8 8 TELEGRAPHY. voltage, a peculiar phenomenon occurs. The ordinary elec- trolytic action of dissolving métal from the anode and de- positing it on the cathode is accomplished through the agency of ions, of atomic dimensions: here, however, the particles torn from the anode are of pondérable size — in- deed, they may easily be seen with the aid of a microscope,, as they lie suspended in the liquid. Under the influence (probably) of electrostatic attraction, they arrange them- selves in bridges, or “ trees,” reaching across from cathode to anode, in much the same way as iron filings distribu te themselves between the pôles of a magnet. These metallic bridges, in their normal condition, form a path of com- paratively low résistance for the current; but when the oscillations from an antenna are allowed to pass through the cell, the bridges are broken down, the conductivity is. destroyed, and a sound is produced in a téléphoné con- neeted in the local battery circuit. The destruction of the bridges is caused by the sudden évolution of gas in the thin film of liquid which séparâtes the individual particles ; this gas is promptly absorbed by the depolarizing agent in the solution, and so the particles are allowed to corne to~ gether and complété the bridges as soon as the oscillations cease. The apparatus is thus self-restoring and constantly réceptive, and its action is said to be uniform and reliable. This automatic responder and téléphoné, when used in connection with the alternating-current transmitter of high- frequency spark described on p. 151, constitutes a System over which a high speed of signaling is possible. Another electrolytic detector, embodying quite a dif- ferent principle, was developed by the writer in the course of a sériés of attempts to magnify the effect of the heating of Fessenden’s “barretter” (see p. 187), by nnmersingTHE RECEIVIXG APPARATUS. 130 the wire in a liquid of high température coefficient and low spécifie heat, which was made part of a local circuit. The attempt was unsuccessful, but it led to the discovery that a simple electrolytic cell, when polarized to the proper critical point by the current from a local battery, is re- markably sensitive to oscillatory impulses.* A simple nitric acid solution, for example, with a minute anode of platinum wire .0001 inch in diameter and a larger plati- num cathode, gave a clearly readable signal when a coherer was absolutely inoperative. The effect is quite distinct from that involved in the de Torest responder, for the platinum anode, minute thougli it is, is not attacked by the electrolyte, and the electrolyte itself is a good conductor. Mnreover, the apparent ré- sistance of the cell falls, on the passage of the oscillations, instead of rising. The phenomenon is a rather complex one which we mav not discuss here, except to note that an interesting reversai of the jirocess occurs when the voltage of the local battery is raised to a point where a considérable ébullition occurs at the anode. In this case, the rapid évolution of gas which occurs when the oscillations pass is sufficient to destrov the contact between the liquid and the anode, and interrupt the current. This effect is quite similar to that which occurs in the Wehnelt interrupter, where the sudden évolu- tion of gas from a small platinum anode is caused to break the primary circuit of an induction coil at rapidly re- * Since the above went into type an announcement bas been publisbed of tbe independent discovery of tbis principle by Scbloemilcb, in Ger- many. Tbe detector tbat be describes is almost identical witb tbe above. See Elektrotechnische Zeitschrift, Nov. 19, 1903.190 WIRELESS TELEGRAPHY. curring intervals, thus doing away with a mechanical break. This reverse action, though very strong, is rather irreg- ular and uncertain, so it is neglected in favor of the direct efïect, which is perfectly uniform and reliable, and practically in- stantaneous. The slightest ir- regnlarity in the sending spark has its efïect in altering the note in the téléphoné,— indeed, a va- riation in the température or quality of the sending spark is often observed by the receiver when the sending operator him- self cannot detect it,— and even when a Wehnelt interrnpter is nsed at the transmitting end, pro- dncing sparks at the rate of a thousand or more per second, each impulse is separatelv de- tected by the receiver, and the resulting musical note is clear and strong. The speed of signaling is thus limited onlv by the ability of the operator to handle his transmit- ting apparatus. The sensitiveness of this detector is extreme, far sur- . passing the coherer, and even the délicate magnetic detector of Marconi. It also lends itself readily to tuning. The arrangement of connections for a simple untuned receiver is shown in Fig. 100, where C is the electrolytic cell, or detector proper, R is an inductive résistance, which serves the double purpose of adjusting the voltage of the local circuit and preventing the escape of the oscillations Fig. 100.— Connections of electrolytic detector in an untuned circuit. A is the antenna ; C, the detector proper ; R, an adjustable inductive résistance, and T, a téléphoné.THE RECEIVING APPARATUS. 191 through the battery, and T is a téléphoné. The téléphoné may be replaced by a siphon recorder when a permanent record is desired. 6. Magnetic Detectors.— Over half acentury ago, Joseph Henry, in the course of his monumental experiments on the relation between electricity and magnetism, tried the effect of discharging a Leyden jar through a coil of wire surrounding a needle. Knowing that a discharge of static electricity is équivalent to an electric current, he naturally expected it to hâve a similar magnetic effect ; but the results were quite the reverse. Not only was the needle Fig. 101.— Rutherford’s magnetic detector. A magnetized Steel needle in a coil of wire, with a magnetometer to observe the changes in mag- netization. not uniformly magnetized by the discharge, but after be- ing magnetized in one direction it was often demagnetized or even reversed. With a wonderful insight, he attributed this anomaly to the fact, afterward demonstrated by Fed- dersen (p. 22), that such a discharge is oscillatory. He says : “ The phenomenon requires us to admit the exis- tence of a principal discharge in one direction, and then several reflex actions backward and 'forward, each more feeble than the preceding, until the equilibrium is ob- tained.”* Scientific Writings *>f Joseph Henry, Vol. I, p. 201, 1886.192 WIRELESS TELEGRAPHY. This principle was applied by Rutherford to a detector of electric waves.* He used Steel needles magnetized to saturation and placed in a coil of wire through which the oscillations passed (Fig. 101), and the changes in maghetic State were detected by a magnet- ometer. Unfortunately, however, with this form of apparatus, a newly magnetized needle is re- quired for each experiment. Other workers hâve improved upon the idea, and Marconi in par- ticular h as developed it into a very serviceabledectector.f In one form of his apparatus, he uses a bundle of iron or Steel wires wound with two coils of copper wire. (Fig. 102.) One of these coils is con- nected between the antenna and ground, the other, to a téléphoné receiver. A permanent magnet is rotated by clockwork close to the core, in such a way that its pôles, alternately approaching and receding, keep up a continuons variation in the mag- netic State of the iron. Ordinarily, these changes of mag- netization are too slow to induce an appréciable electro- motive force in the coil, and the téléphoné is silent; but when oscillations pass through the other winding, the smoothly-varying flux is jarred, as it were, into a sudden * Philosophical Transactions, 1897. f See paper before Roy. Instn. of Great Britain, June 13, 1903, in Eîcclrician, Juse 27, 1903, p. 388. A A J? le. Fig. 102.— Marconi's magnetic detector. A is the antenna coil, B the téléphoné coil, C the core of iron wires, and N S a permanent magnet rotated by clockwork.THE RECEIVIXG APPARATUS. 193 change, a momentary current flows, and a Sound is heard iiï the téléphoné. The efïect may be compared to the well-known fact that a magnetized bar, when struck or jarred, loses part of its magnetism ; and it would seem that the rapidly varying im- pulses caused by the waves hâve a similar disturbing efïect on the molecular State of the iron. It is evidently a hys- térésis efïect. We know that, when a piece of iron is alter- nately magnetized and demagnetized, the magnetization Fio. 103.— Mareoni’s magnetic detector— improved form. W is a con- tinuons band of iron wires, passing over the pulleys P P', and threading the coils A and B. M and M' ara fixed permanent magnets. always lags behind the magnetizing force, as if the molé- cules of the métal were restrained by some viscous résist- ance from arranging themselves in the way the force impels them. With soft iron the hystérésis is not great, but Steel, especiallv when hardened, is very reluctant to change its 13WIRELESS TELEGRAPHY. m magnetic State. Under the influence of the oscillations, however, the hystérésis is diminished, and the molécules, freed from this restraint, jump suddenly into place and a signal is produced. The Sound is loudest when the magnet is approaching the core and less when it is receding, so the sensitiveness of the detector is constantly varying. This is a great dis- advantage in practical signal ing, and to obviate the diffi- culté, Mr. Marconi has devised another form of apparatus, (Fig. 103.) Here the magnet is fixed and the core moves — not transversely across the pôles of the magnet, but in the direction of its own length. In short, the core is a con- tinuons band of iron wires, passing over two pulleys, and. threading a double coil of wire placed between the pôles of a magnet. In this way a fresh mass of iron is continuously exposed to the action of the oscillations, and the per- formance of the apparatus is made uniform and regular. This apparatus has been so perfected that its sensitive- ness is very great, and its action thoroughly reliable. 7. Arrangement of Receiving Apparatus.— Open-circuit detectors of the coherer type are characterized by the fact that a différence of potential between the terminais is neces- sary to operate them. In its normal sensitive condition no appréciable current flows through the coherer, and it is not until the différence of potential reaches a certain critical point that the insulation breaks down and the particles cohere. It matters little whether this potential be oscillating, slowly alternating, or direct — indeed the voltage of the local battery, if raised above a volt or so, will cause the apparatus to block and become inoperative. This feature makes the coherer ill adapted to the ordi-THE RECEIVIXG APPARATUS. 195 nary connection in sériés, between the antenna and ground. The base of the antenna is, as we know, a loop of the oscil- lation, where the current is a maximum, and the variation of potential is normally zéro ; hence a coherer located at this point works to very poor ad- vantage. Various arrangements hâve been devised to avoid the dif- ficulty, for it is obviously im- possible to operate the coherer at the nodal point at the top of the wire. One method, due V777777777777777777777&777777Z to Prof. Slaby* is Fig. 104.— Slaby’s method of operating a coherer. A hori- zontal wire B is attached near the base of the antenna A and the coherer T is connected at its outer end. N. N are nodes of the oscillation, L a loop. Figs. 104 to 106. I. Fig. 105.— Slaby’s method (2). An inductance coil I is in- serted at the base of the an- tenna, to stiffen the coupling be- tween the wire B and the an- tenna. k shown in If a straight horizontal wire of the proper length be attached to the antenna near its foot (Fig. 104), it will vibrate in unison with the latter with a node at its outer end, and a coherer may then be connected be- tween this end and the ground. In order that the horizontal wire may be set in vibration, there must be some variation of potential at its inner end, so it is connected to the antenna at a little dis- tance above the ground; or, better still, a coil having a small self-induction is inserted in the ground wire. (Fig. Slaby, Die Funkentelegraphie, p. 110.190 WIRELESS TELEGRAPHY. 105.) In practice, there is no need of stretching the aux- iliary wire out straight, for it may as well be wound into a coil of suitable length, as in Fig. 106. In this form the apparatns is called by Slaby a “ multiplier/’ (Multipli- Tcator) and we shall consider it further in the next chapter. Another method of connect- ing the coherer is through a transformer, or induction coil. (Fig. 107.) This has the ad- vantage, not only of providing an uninterrupted path for the oscillations in the antenna and of establishing a convenient node for the coherer, but, by a suitable arrangement of winding, the voltage may be stepped up so as to increase its effect on the coherer. It is not sufficient to simply multiply the turns of the secondary winding, as in the case of an ordinary induc- tion coil ; for here we are dealing no longer with alterna- tions of such low frequency that the current may be con- sidered the same in ail parts of the circuit, but with oscil- lations of such rapidity that the time required for an im- pulse to travel from one end of the coil to the other is considérable, compared to the period of the oscillation; and the distributal capacity of the wire itself, acting like a sériés of condensers strung along the route, stores up energy where it is not wanted, and gives rise to certain peculiar effects. We may compare the induction coil to a pipe line of rigid métal, in which the flow is constant Fig. 106.—If a coil M be substituted for the wire B, Fig. 105, we hâve Slaby’s “ Multi- plier.”THE RECEIVIXG APPARATUS. 197 fl. throughout its length ; while the high-frequency coil is like a tube of elastic rubber, which swells and contracts witb variations of pressure, and it is even possible to hâve the water flowing in opposite direc- tions in different parts of the tube at the same time. This property may be turned to use- ful account, however: for in- stance, we may so proportion the tube for a given frequency of flow of the water that a con- sidérable velocity may occur at the middle of the tube, while the ends, which are closed, ex- périence only variations of pres- sure. This resuit, for electrical os- cillations, lias been accom- plished by Marconi in his “ jigger,”* one form of which is shown in Fig. 108. The primary consists in a single layer of, say 100 turns of in- sulated copper wire, while the secondary has, say 1,000 turns of finer wire, wound in a peculiar manner. The coil is divided into two equal sec- tions, each of which is wound so as to hâve a triangular cross-section, the inner layer having the greatest number of turns, and the succeeding layers being tapered off gradu- ally, so that the outer layer has only two or three turns. *77777. Fig. 107.— A coherer T con- nected to an antenna A through a transformer, P S. The con- denser C prevents short cir- cuiting the battery through the coil. See Eng. pat. No. 12,320, June 1, 1898.198 WIRELESS TELEGRAPHY. The inner ends of the coils are connected together and the outer ends go to the coherer. In the figure, the zigzag lines represent diagrammatically successive layers of the Fig. 108.—Marconi’s jigger — half section. G is a glass tube on which are wound the primary P and secondary S. Each of the zigzag lines represents a layer of winding. The terminais A E of the primary are connected to the antenna and to earth, and the terminais C J of the secondary go to the coherer and the recording apparatus. winding, the individual wires being perpendicular to the plane of the paper. A more improved form of the apparatus* is shown in Fig. 109, and its connections to the coherer and receiving apparatus in Fig. 110. The inner terminais of the second- Fig. 109.— Marconi’s jigger — improved arrangement. The secondary winding j2 is divided in the middle and the ends are connected to a con- denser, j3. For connections, see Fig. 110. ary winding are connected to a condenser, and thence, through choke coils which confine the oscillations to the jigger circuit, to the relav and local battery. Eng. pat. No. 25,186, Dec. 19, 1899.THE RECEIVING APPARATUS. 190 In this arrangement the coherer is plaeed at a decided node of the secondary oscillation, whose voltage is much higher than that of the primary. The effectiveness of the device is shown by the fact that it enables signais to be received at ten times the distance that is pos- sible when the coherer is simply inserted in the antenna circuit. Conversely, it makes it possible to use less sensitive coherers, which are mudh more reliable and easily handled than the very sensitive ones. The “ jigger ” is to some extent a syntonie device, as it works best when designed with reference to the height of the antenna and the frequency of the oscillations. It will be considered further in the next chapter, together with a va- riety of other syntonie receivers. 8. Current Multiplying Devices.— Many detectors differ from the coherer in the fact that their operation does not dépend upon the voltage of the oscillation, but on the cur- rent. A thermal detector, for instance, is dépendent di- rectly upon the heating effect of the current. Such detect- ors should be plaeed, not at a node of the oscillation, but at a loop. For this reason they operate effectively when simply connected between the antenna and ground. If it is desired to multiply the effect by a transformer, it should be designed to step-down the voltage and thus increase the current — a process quite the reverse of that which occurs in Marconi’s “ jigger.” To accomplish this successfully, it Fig. 110.— Connections of jigger, Fig. 109. T is the coherer, across the sec- ondary terminais. The battery B and relay R are connected across the con- denser js through choke coils Ci, Cj. The primary jx goes to the antenna A and earth E.200 W IRE LE 8 S TELEGRAPHY. is usually necessary to tune the circuits in unison, and we shall consider, in the next chapter, the means by which this Fig. 111.—A cur- rent-multiplying coil for detectors of the closed circuit type. B and C are two coils of unequal numbers of turns, wound in closely in- ductive relation, A is the antenna ter- minal, and D the detector. The cur- rent in the longer coil B is opposed to that in the antenna, and the current in C is equal to the arithmetical sum of the other two. may be done. Another arrangement, which is net necessarily syntonie in its action, has been used successfully by the writer. It is based on the principle that rapidly oscillating currents in a System of con- ductors tend to distribute themselves in such a way as to make the kinetic energy a minimum.* It consists in a simple annular coil, made up of two wires wound side by side, as close to- gether as possible, so that their mutual induction shall be large. The two cir- cuits are similar, except that one has more turns than the other, say in the ratio of three to two, and they are connected in parallel between the an- tenna and ground. (Fig. 111.) jSTow, if the currents in the antenna were continuons or slowly alternating, they would distribute themselves be- tween the two coils according to the résistance; but for rapidly oscillating currents this is not the case. Here the self-induction is the controlling factor. If the currents in the two coils were approximately equal, they would induce a magnetic field of considérable kinetic energy, and the tendency is to reduce this energy to a minimum. This is accomplished when the two currents flow in opposite direc- tions, and are numerically proportional inversely to the See J. J. Thomson, Recent Researches in Elec. and Mag., Chap. VI.TUE RECEIVING APPARATUS. 201 number of tums. Their magnetic effects then neutralizé each other, and the kinetic energy of the System, as a whole. is a minimum. The current in the antenna, which is eqnal to the algebraic sum of the currents in the two coils, is thus smaller than either of the latter: for example, in the case cited, if the current in the antenna be unity, the cur- rent in coil C will be + 3 units, and that in B will be — 2 units. Looking at the matter from another point of view, sup- pose for the moment that the currents in the two coils are in the same direction : the resulting magnetic field will in- duce an electromotive force in each coil ; but the EMF of B will be greater than that of C, and will cause a local cur- rent to flow through the two coils in sériés until its mag- netic effect balances that of the main current, and the re- sulting flux is zéro. Unless the différence in the number of turns of the coils is great, the local current will be greater than that in the main circuit, and a detector con- nected in either branch will expérience a correspondingly magnified effect. It should be remembered, however, that this is not a perpetual-motion machine, and so cannot create energy. Increased current in the detector means an increased ex- penditure of energy, and this can never be greater than that received by the antenna. Before this limit is reached, the ohmic résistance has its effect, and cuts down the current in the antenna ; so that the multiplving effect of the coil goes for naught. It is possible, however, with suitably designed coils, to amplify the signal considerably ; thus, with a certain coil having a ratio of tums of 3 : 4, the in- tensity of the signal was increased nearly fourfold — the full theoretical value. Usuallv, a similar resuit may be accomplished by tun- ing, and we shall now tum to that phase of the subject.CHAPTER VI. SELECTIVE SIGNALING. 1. The Problem.—* Thus far we hâve considered mainly two phases of the subject: First, the means of producing powerful vibrations, capable of traveling over long dis- tances; and, second, the construction of a receiving ap- paratus, sufficiently sensitive to detect these radiations, even when greatly attenuated. Given a powerful trans- mitter and a sensitive receiver, a new problem présents itself: How can we control and direct these radiations so that they shall reach the receiver for which they are intended, and not make havoc with ail others within their sphere of influence? The radiations from an antenna spread out uniformly in ail directions, like light from a beacon, and the receivers which we hâve been consider- ing, like so many human eyes, respond almost equally well to the signais from ail transmitters within their range. For use on shipboard, and between ships and shore, this is a distinct advantage; for it is important that a ship be able to communicate with any other ship, and that ail vessels may connect with the shore stations. Be- sides, where vessels are scattered over the high seas, the çhances of interférence are small, and even where two or three ships are “ talking ” at once, it is not difficult to dis- tinguish between them. Especially where téléphonie re- ceivers are used, the different qualities of sound due to the peculiarities of different transmitters make it quite easy to hear and read any one of several messages coming .at the same time, just as several conversations may be [202]SELECTIVE 8WXALISG. 203 carried on in the same room without interférence; but when the requirements of commercial work multiply stations and magnify their power, we shall hâve a vérita- ble stock exchange, in which sélective signaling will be indispensable. The demand is not so much for secrecy, for this may always be secured by means of codes. There is not the least difficulty in tapping a land telegraph line, and eavesdropping over the téléphoné is easier still,— vet the telegraph and téléphoné are among our most valu- able instruments of commerce. The main requirement is to communicate at will with any one of several stations, without interfering with messages passing between other stations at the same time. Three methods hâve been proposed for accomplishing this : First. To direct the radiation of the transmitter, like the beam of a searchlight, so that it shall go only where it is wanted. Second. To tune the oscillations of transmitter and re- ceiver so that only those stations which hâve the same frequency or “tune ” can communicate: this is équivalent to providing lighthouses with lights of different colors, and eausing the observer to look through colored spectacles which eut off ail light but that for which he is looking. Third. To give the radiations a distinctive character, aside from their wave-frequency, e. g., by varving the fre- quency of interruption of the spark: thus, lighthouses which are otherwise alike are caused to émit flashes at stated intervals, by which thev may be distinguished. Ail three of these methods hâve been used, and each has its peculiar advantages. 2. Directed Signais.— The first and most obvious method is to send the signais only in the direction where they204 WIRELESS TELEGRAPHY. are needed. Marconi, in sonie of his earliest experiments, nsed this metliod, foiiowing the lead of Hertz in concen- trating the radiations into a bundle of parallel rays, bv means of a parabolic reflector (see p. 132). This arrange- ment is entirely feasible and quite successful where small oscillators are nsed ; but the mirrors, in order to be effective, must be at least comparable in dimensions to the wave-length of the oscillator, and, for the best results, they should be much larger. When long antennaï are nsed, emitting radiations with a wave-length of a thousand feet or so, reflectors are quite out of the question. It is unfortunate that some such device as this lias not been made practicable, for it would not only resuit in a great saving of energy, due to its concentration in the one direction where it can be made useful, but the range of signaling would be greatly extended, on account of the diminished atténuation of the waves,— just as the beam of a searchlight is more efficient and more pene- trating tlian the light of an ordinary beacon. Lacking this, we must hâve recourse to one or other of the meth- ods of tuning. 3. Syntonie Signaling.— The second method is that of electrical résonance, or syntony. We hâve leamed a good deal about this in Part One, and now we need only review the principles involved, and see how they may be applied in practice. We hâve seen that, in order to hâve strong résonance between two circuits, both must be persistent vibrators. If the oscillator sends out waves whose amplitude de- cavs rapidly, the resonator, whose vibration is built up as the summation of ail the impulses received, will not be fairly started before the impulses die out. On the other hand, if the oscillation of the resonator is strongly dampedSELECTIVE SLGNALISG. 205 a point is soon reached where the energy is dissipated as fast as it is received, and no amount of persistence on the part of incoming waves will increase the amplitude of its vibration. The phenomenon of multiple résonance shows that the strongly damped vibrations of a Hertzian oscillator may excite oscillations in resonators of widely differing periods, just as a beam of white light appears red when viewed through a red glass, and green when viewTed through a green glass, whereas a beam of pure color should be visi- ble only through a glass of the proper tint. So with strongly damped oscillations, strong résonance and sharp tuning are both impossible, and we miss the two great advantages of a good syntonie System: strong response to a feeble signal, and the ability to distinguish one set of signais from another. îsTow, a grounded antenna is simply half of a Hertzian oscillator, on a large scale; and we know that the latter is a very poor vibrator — its oscillations decay to one- tenth of their initial amplitude in about nine vibrations. (See p. 67.) Increasing the size of an oscillator does not affect its damping, if the proportions be kept the same — a large oscillator radiâtes more energy than a small one, but it also conta ins more, and the proportion of the total energy sent ofï during each oscillation is the same, whatever the size of the oscillator.* So we would naturally expect the oscillation of a simple antenna to hâve a high rate of decay, and this is indeed the case. The reason for this will be apparent, if we refer again to the diagrams, Figs. 89-92. It is readilv seen that the fraction of the total energy sent off in the detached wave during each oscillation dépends upon the number of Fara- * Sre Macdonald. Electric Waves, p. 77.206 WIRELE88 TELEGRAPEY. day tubes which go to make up the wave, and on the relative energies of the detached part of a tube and of the part that goes back to the oseillator. The process of separating off the waves is very much like the boyish game of “ snap-the-whip,” where each boy represents a tube. The chances of a certain boy being snapped off the line dépend upon his distance from the end of the line; and the number of boys snapped off, and the violence with which they go, dépend upon the suddenness of the snap. So with our oseillator. The chances of a tube being snapped off dépend upon the wideness of the circuit that it makes; the tubes that stretch nearly straight from pôle to pôle of the oseillator, or from the antenna to ground, simply shrink back into the conductor; while those that make a wide circuit into space are snapped off. Again, the number of tubes snapped off and their relative energy dépend upon the suddenness of the snap; i. e., the fre- quency of the oscillations. If the oseillator be allowed to discharge slowly through a high résistance, ail the tubes will hâve time to shrink back and be absorbed, and there will be no radiation; but if the discharge be sudden and rapid, many of the tubes will be snapped off, and the number and relative size of the detached loops will dépend upon the suddenness of the snap. This suggests one method of prolonging the oscilla- tions. If we can diminish the frequency of the oscillation without altering the electrostatic field about the antenna, the rate of decay will be decreased. This may be ac- complished by inserting a self-induction coil between the antenna and the ground, thereby increasing the “ inertia ” of the circuit and slowing down the oscillations. It isSELECTIVE SI GN ALI N G. 207 analogous to hanging a weight at the middle of a vibrating string. The curve, Fig. 112, shows the resuit of sueh an experi- ment made by the writer. The transmitter was a plain multiple-wired antenna, in sériés with which was a coil of twenty tums of coarse wire having an inductance of Fig. 112.— Curve of résonance between two distant antennœ with in- ductance in sériés. Lx is the constant inductance of transmitter, L2 the variable inductance of receiver, D the detector and measuring apparatus. .043 millihenry — or about three times that of the an- tenna itself. The receiver was a similar antenna with an inductance that could be varied. The abscissas of the curve represent the values of this inductance, and the ordinates, the corresponding intensities of the cur- rent in the receiver. By this means a fairly sharp réso- nance point is found, whereas the same antennæ, without208 WIRELESS TELEGRAPHY. the extra inductance, are so nearly dead-beat tliat réso- nance between them is difficült to detect at ail, and the receiver responds almost equally well to oscillations of widely v-arying frequencies. It should be noted, however, that this method of pro- longing the oscillations does so at the expense of intensity of the signais. The total energy of the oscillation is the same, whether the inductance be used or not; but in the latter case the energy is radiated with a sudden rush, making a strong evanescent wave like the sound of a drum, while in the former the same energy is distrib- uted over a longer interval, as when a bell is struck, and the amplitude of the wave is correspondingly reduced. This method is thus of limited utility, unless means be em- ployed for increasing the initial energy of the oscillation. Another method of prolonging the oscillations, which possesses certain adv-antages, is by increasing the capacity, as Marconi did with his early antennæ by attaching a plate at the top. (See p. 141.) This increases the total energy of the wave-train, and at the same time prolongs the oscillations by reducing the frequency. Looking at it from the Faraday tube point of view, the total number of tubes proceeding from the antenna is increased, owing to the increased charge, but as the frequency is dimin- ished, a relatively smaller number of tubes are “ snapped off ” at eacli oscillation. The oscillations are thus pro- longed without a corresponding decrease of intensity. 4. Lodge’s Syntonie Cônes and Leyden Jars.— Sir Oliver Lodge and Dr. Alex. Muirhead devised a System of syn- tonie signaling, combining both these principles.* The transmitting apparatus is the ungrounded oscillator re- See English pat. No. 3 8,644, July 16, 1898.SELECTIVE 8IGNALIXG* 209 ferred to on p. 136, with an inductance coil inserted be- tween the two large capacity-cones. (Fig. 113.) The receiving apparatus is similar, with a coherer substituted for the spark gap — or rather connected in shunt across the inductance, thereby getting the full différence of po- tential in the coil without interfering with the oscillations. Fio. 113.— Lodge’s syntonie cônes with inductance coils (cf. Fig. 71, p. 136); Trans. is the transmitter. Rec. the receiver, with coherer T, battery B and rela.y R. S is a non-inductive shunt to eliminate the choking effect of thé highly inductive receiving apparatus R. Even this combination method, though it is operative within certain limitations, falls short of what is required in a practicable working System. Lodge also devised an experiment which illustrâtes beautifullv the principle of résonance.* A pair of Ley- den jars whose opposite coatings are connected, each pair * Lodge, Hignallinç ihrmigh Space vithoui IVt’res, 3d ed., p. 6. 14210 WIRELESS TELEGRAPH Y. by a loop of wire, are placed a short distance apart, as shown in Fig. 114. The circuit of one of the jars is interrupted by a spark gap, so that oscillations may be set up when the jar is charged by means of an electrical machine, and the other is provided with a slider, by which the length of the circuit may be varied until its period is the same as that of the oscillator. When this is done, Fig. 114.— Lodge's syntonie Leyden jars. The two circuits are tuned to résonance by moving the slider S until sparks appear in the “ overflow ” air-gap. résonance occurs and sparks may be drawn f roiû the second jar. In this case, nearly ail the Faraday tubes run straight across, through the glass, from coating to coating of the jars — very few of them reach out into space — conse-SELECTIVE SIGNALING. 211 quently the oscillations are very much prolonged and extremely sharp résonance is possible. Only a small movement of the slider is required to throw the jars out of tune. Unfortunately, how- ever, such a System is a very poor radiator, and the effect can be observed only at a short distance — indeed the properties of good radiation and persistent oscillation are directlv opposed to each other, and the conditions which im- prove the one impair the other. Some sort of a com- promise must be effected. 5. Marconi’s Concentric Cylin- ders.—Marconi devised a Sys- tem embodying the principle of the syntonie jars, but he made the “ jars” very long and narrow, so that they would hâve a considerablé ra- diating surface. In other words, he used two vertical concentric cylinders of zinc, separated by an air space, which formed a condenser of considérable capacity and at the same time played the part of an antenna.* The cylinders at the sending sta- tion were connected together through an inductance and a spark gap, and the inner cylinder was grounded. (Fig. trie cylinders, Ci, C2» combine the functions of condenser and antenna, and the frequency may be adjusted by varying the in- ductance L. See Eng. pat. No. 5,387, March 21, 1900.212 WI RE LE SS TELEGRAPUY. 115.) At the receiving station the arrangement was similar, but without the spark gap and with a coherer and recording apparatus connected across the inductance. This System was used with considérable success for a time, and was found capable of working over a distance of thirty miles, with cylinders seven meters liigh and 1.5 meters in diameter, but it was finally sup- planted by a better arrangement. 6. The Closed Oscillating Circuit.— The great desideratum is a transmitter wliose oscillations are prolonged as much as possible, and yet whose radiation is not correspondingly diminished in intensity; in other words, one which is capable of giving off energy at a good rate for a considérable time. This means that the initial supply of energy must be large. The closed oscillating circuit of Lodge’s syntonie jars possesses two of these quali- fies; its oscillations are prolonged, and the supply of energy is limited only by the capacity of the jars and the \oltage to which they are charged. But this arrangement is a poor radiator. Is it not possible to combine such an oscillating System of high power with a good radiator in such a way that its energy may be made available for signaling? This is what is done by the physicist when it is desired to increase the Sound of a tuning fork: the fork itself is a persistent vibrator but a poor radiator, so it is mounted on a reso- tenna with closed oscillating cir- cuit. The re- son a t i n g box takes energy from the tun- ing fork and ra- diâtes lt as sound. nating box, tuned to the same pitch as the fork, and thus the energy of the fork is made available as sound. (Fig. 116.)SELECTIVE SWXALIXG. 213 The same thing may be done with electrical oscillators, by coupling a closed oscillating circuit (a persistent vi- brator) to an ordinary antenna (a good radiator). The coupling may be accomplished in a number of ways, ail of which are modifications or combinations of the three methods illustrated in Figs. 117 to 119 : the first con- ductive, the second electrostatic, the third inductive. Figs. 117, 118, 119.— Three methods of coupling a closed oscillating circuit, C G L, to an antenna A ; the first, a rigid electrical connection across a résistance R (Fig. 117) ; the second, an elastic connection across a condenser C' (Fig. 118) ; the third, an inductive coupling through a transformer, M (Fig. 119). These three methods may be illustrated by their me- chanical analogues, Figs. 120 to 122, which show three methods of communicating the vibrations of a tuning fork to a stretched string. The first is a rigid mechanical con- nection between the fork and the string; the second is an elastic connection, through a spring; the third is through a transversely vibrating rod or lever carrying at its center of vibration a mass, whose inertia serves the purpose of a fulcrum. So, in coupling the oscillating circuit to the antenna, we may hâve a rigid electrical connection across a dead résistance (Fig. 117) ; an elastic connection across a con-214 WIRELESS TELEGRAPHY. denser (Fig. 118);* or an inductive coupling through a transformer (Fig. 119). In ail these cases the essential element is the création of a variation of potential at the base of the antenna, as in thd mechanical analogues we must hâve a variation of pressure on the string, if it is to be set in vibration. In the first case, this is accom- plished by the ohmic drop in the dead résistance; in the second, by the elastic reaction of the dielectric in the condenser; in the third, by the inertia reaction of the Fig. 120. Fig. 121. Fig. 122. Figs. 120, 121, 122.— Three methods of coupling a tuning fork F to a vibrating string S, tuned in unison with it ; the first, a rigid mechanical connection through the reciprocating rod R (Fig. 120) ; the second, an elastic connection through a spring C (Fig. 121) ; the third, an inertia coupling through the mass M (Fig. 122), which acts as a fulcrum to the vibrating rod A B. ether surrounding the coil. The first is obviously a wasteful method (at least in its simple form), as the ohmic drop is accomplished at the expense of energy con- verted into heat, with a conséquent damping of the os- * A more strictly analogous case is that of Leclier and of Hertz, Fig. 34.SELECTIVE S1GNALING. 215 dilations. The second is more. efficient, and has been advocated by some workers. The third is the method which, with its modifications, is almost universally used, and we shall now consider it more carefully. 7. Inductively Interlinked Circuits.— Where we are dealing with very rapid oscillations, the inductive effects of the currents are so powerful that no spécial apparatus is required to produce them — two wires lying side by side affect each other strongly, and even a stovepipe erected near an antenna may be the source of disagree- able shocks. In the case of Lodge’s syntonie jars, the ef- fect is one of almost pure induction — there is no true radiation worth mentioning. So, to connect the closed oscillating circuit to the antenna, a transformer of very few turns is sufficient. It is usually a coil of stout wire or cable inclosing a similar secondary coil, without iron, and the whole immersed in a vessel of oil. (cf. Fig. 77, p. 147.) Now let us see what occurs when such a System is put in operation. To get -a clear idea of the phenomena we should put aside ail preconceived ideas as to the opera- tion of a transformer, and look at the matter afresh from Maxwell’s point of view. We shall thus be in a position to see some notable apparent exceptions to the theory as it is usually applied to ordinary alternating circuits. The oscillating currents in the closed primary circuit create a variable magnetic field in the space inclosed by the coil. The “ inertia ” of this field constitutes the self- induction of the primary, and there must be an electro- motive force across the terminais of the coil to overcome this inertia. But this field does not affect the primary alone; at least part of it is embraced by the secondary216 WIRELEtiS TE LEO RAP H F. also, and a similar electromotive force is induced across the secondary terminais. In like manner (referring to Fig. 122) the vibrating tuning fork tends to set in mo- tion the mass M, attached to the rod AB which con- nects it with the string. If the end B, of this rod, be held immovable, the mass will vibrate with the fork, re- qniring a force to keep it in motion, and so retarding the vibration of the fork as if it were attached to the prong. But, at the same time, the inertia reacts at the fixed end, B, of the lever, and so a force is exerted which tends to set this end in motion. This force will impose forced vibrations on the string, whatever the period of the fork may be, and the intensity of the force dépends upon the lengths of the lever arms, AM and BM. So our transformer will impose forced oscillations on the antenna, whatever the period of the primary circuit, and the electromotive force which produces these oscillations is approximately proportional to the ratio of turns. Thus far no exceptions. Now let the frequency of the primary circuit be changed, by altering either the capacity, C, or the in- ductance, L.* As the frequency of the oscillation ap- proaches the natural frequency of the antenna there is a marked increase in the amplitude of the secondary os- cillation, until the point is reached where the two cir- cuits are “ in tune,” and the amplitude of the oscillation reaches a maximum. When this occurs, the current in the secondary of the transformer is too great to be * Remembering that the frequency is N =--=. L and C being 2* |/LC botli expressed in the same System of units, and N being in cycles per second..SELECTIVE 8IGXALIXG. 217 neglected, and being in opposition to the primary cur- rent, it tends to neutralize the effect of the iatter in proi ducing a magnetic field. In the idéal case (never at- tainable in practice) where both circuits are perfectly free oscillators exactly in tune, and where the two coils of the transformer are perfectly interlinked, without magnetic leakage, we should hâve no flux wbatever in the transformer, no EMF. across either primary or secondary, and the ratio of primary to secondary currents would be equal to the inverse ratio of turns. This is analogous to the case where the tuning fork and its string are exactly in tune, and the amplitudes of their respective vibrations are proportional to the lever arms, AM and BM. The mass, M, will then be motion- less, and there will be no force acting on either the string or the fork. Any change in the amplitude of either vibra- tion will set the mass M in motion, and the inertia reactions which resuit will tend to retard one vibration and aug- ment the other, until the stable condition is again attained. This leads to the conclusion that the amount of step- ping-up of the voltage from the primary condenser to the antenna is not directly proportional to the ratio of turns of the transformer — indeed, in our idéal case, the reverse is true; L ethe greater the ratio of second- ary to primary turns, the less the secondary current, and consequentlv the potential to which the antenna is charged. With a simple 1 : 1 transformer the two currents are equal and the potential dépends simply upon the ratio of the capacities of primary and antenna. We may thus step up the voltage to any desired extent (within limits), bv in- creasing the capacity and decreasing the inductance of the primary circuit.218 WIRELESS TELEGRAPHY. In actuâl practice these principles are modified to sonie extent by the fact that the antenna is a good radiator, and so there must be a transfer of energy to it from Fig. 123.— Two masses Mlt M2, supported by sp rings Sj, S2, and ad- justed to vibrate up and down in syn- chronism. Fig. 124.— The same masses con- nected by a light rod R. The vibra- tion remains un- changed. Fig. 125.— The masses Mi and Ms of Figs. 123 and 124 divided, and part of each moved to the middle of the rod. If the ratio Mp : Ms is equal to : M2, the System vibrâtes about Mm as a fulcrum with an increased fre- quency. the primary. Hence, to use the mechanical figure, the mass M is never really motionless ; and there must alwavs be a flux in the transformer and a corresponding départ lire from the idéal conditions. Another corollary is that two circuits which are turned separately to the same period will not necessarily be in tune when brought into inductive relation ; or, if they are in tune, their frequency will generally be altered. This may be illustrated by another mechanical model. Suppose two masses, Mi and M2,(Fig. 123) to be supported, each by a spring, Si and S2, in such a manner they may vibrate freely up and down with a frequency depending upon the mass and on the elasticity of the spring. Sup- pose further that each mass is so proportioned to the elas- ticity of its spring that their periods of vibration are the same.SELECTIVE SIGNALIXG. 219 Now let the masses be connected by a rod of negligible mass (Fig. 124). They will vibrate in unison, as before, with the frequency unchanged. Fig. 126.— Two closed oscillating circuits with their capacities Ci, C2, and inductances, Li, L2, so adjusted that the product L1C1 — L2C2. The two circuits are then in tune. Suppose now that the masses be divided, and a portion of each moved out to the center of the rod (Fig. 125). The masses will no longer vibrate together, moving up and down in unison, for this is an unstable condition; but each will tend to vibrate with a new frequency of its own depending upon its mass, but restrained by the rod. If the masses Mpand Msbe properly selected with reference to their springs these frequencies may be made the same, and the masses will then vibrate in unison, but not in 'phase: Mp will move up when Ms its moving down, in sew-saw fashion, while M m remains motionless. The frequency of the System will be higher than the original fre- quency, according to the proportion of the individual masses made inactive by mov- ing them to the middle. i-m. Fig. 127.— The same two circuits brought into inductive relation. The mutual in- duction, Lm, partly neutralizes the self- inductions Lj and L2. leaving Lp and La to control the frequency.220 W IRE LE 8 S TELEGRAPHY. Thus we may hâve two electrical oscillating circuits (Fig. 126), each with its inductance, L, and capacity, C, corresponding to the mass and elasticity of the mechanical vibrators, and tuned to oscillate in unison. When these circuits are brought into inductive relation, however, the conditions are changed (Fig. 127). The magnetic fields of the two inductance coils now overlap, and may be separated into three parts: First, the part whose flux is interlinked with the primary coil only, and constitùtes the effective primary self-induction, Lp; second, the part whose flux is interlinked with the secondary alone, and constitùtes the effective secondary self-induction, Ls ; and, third, the part whose flux is interlinked with both, and constitùtes the mutual induction, Lm. This mutual flux tends to become zéro,* and so reduce the kinetic energy of the field to a minimum, leaving the fluxes of Lp and Ls alone to control the frequency of the oscillation ; just as the mass Mm tends to remain motionless, and let Mp and Ms control the vibration. In practice, however, this state of affairs is only ap- proximated, as the mutual flux is necessarv to transfer energy from the primary to the secondary. This may be illustrated in the mechanical model by supposing the mass Mg to be retarded by a friction, which dissipâtes energy in heat as the antenna does in radiation. The mass Mm will then not remain motionless, but will vibrate sufRciently to transfer energy from Mp to supply that lost by Mg. The departure from the idéal conditions is usuallv not very great. For example, Fig. 128 shows a résonance curve * It affects the two oscillations in opposite senses, augmenting the one and opposing the other, while it, in turn, owes its existence to a différence between the opposing magnetic effects of the currents* It thus tends to its own destruction.SELECTIVE SIGXALING. 221 between the two antennæ referred to on p. 207, taken nnder the same conditions, except that the sending antenna was conpled inductively to a closed oscillating circuit. The same coil L was connected in sériés with the sending antenna, but in the one case (Fig. 112) this coil was used as a simple self-induction, wliile in the other (Fig. 128) Current in receiver—Scale arbitrary. O* CA «e £ L; i t.007 —I— —i— B At A, r L \ D Rec. A ; Li U \ 0 T •ans ‘M \ \ N A JO .02 .01 .06 .08 .10 .12 .14 J8 Receiver inductance, L2 — millihenry. Fig. 128.— Curve of résonance between a transmitting antenna AjLlf v/itli closed oscillating circuit CPC'G, and a receiving antenna A2, witn variable inductance L2 and detector D. The secondary coil Li is the same as 1., in Fig. 112. it was placed within a second coil, which constituted the primary of a transformer of which the antenna coil was the secondary. These two circuits were tuned to résonance by adjusting the primary capacity. At the receiving end the same variable inductance was used in the simple an-222 WIRELESS TELEGRAPHY. tenna circuit, and the curve is plotted on the same scale, with values of this inductance as abscissas and intensities of signais as ordinales. The spark length was decreased for the compound oscillator, so that the maxima hâve ap- proximately the same value, and the curves may thus be compared directly. The différence is striking. In the curve, Fig. 112, the inductance at the résonance point is .042 millihenry — al- most exactly the same as that in the sending circuit. In Fig. 128, the inductance is reduced to .007 millihenry, or one-sixth of this value. In other words, five-sixths, or 83$, of the self-induction Li is neutralized by the mutual induc- tion, and the frequency is thus brought so near to the nat- ural frequency of the antenna that the maximum occurs al- most on the axis. And this with a transformer that was very loosely wound, so that there was a large amount of leakage. With closely interlinked coils the approximation to the idéal conditions may become very close. The résonance curves are not sharp, owing to the use of the simple antenna circuit for receiving—a poor resonator. To recapitulate, we find that the use of a closed oscil- lating circuit, with a condenser of large capacity compared to that of the antenna, not only prolongs the oscillations, by virtue of its property of storing energy, but it may also increase the intensity of the radiation by increasing the potential to which the antenna is charged; and that the intensity of the radiation, as well as the rate of decay, may be varied within wide limits by changing the windings of the transformer and the amount of additional self-induc- tion in the primary or secondary circuits. Thus the ap- paratus may be adapted at will to use with tuned re- ceivers, or with the simple “ responsive ” or untuned re- ceivers previously described. The frequency also may be8 ELECTIVE SIGNAUX G. 223 varied within wide limite, without changing the propor- tions of the antenna — an important feature where several stations must intercommunicate at will. In such cases, each station may hâve several sets of apparatns, each tuned to a different frequency, which may be connected to the antenna as needed. Indeed it is possible to work two or more transmitters at once from the same antenna, each sending signais in ite own tune, just as the belly of a violin — an aperiodic radiator — may resound to the notes of two or more strings at once. 8. Tuned Receiving Apparatus.— Given a transmitter capable of emitting radiations with a small rate of decay, the next requisite of a syntonie System is a strongly-reso- nant receiver. Many of the factors which go to make a good transmitter apply equally well to the receiver. A good radiator is, in general, a good absorber ; so an antenna which works well at the sending end may be used with good results for receiv- ing. So also, a persistent oscillator usually makes a good resonator, and a correspondingly poor absorber. Hence we must resort to the same kind of compromise at the re- ceiving end as was neeessary in the transmitter, coupling the antenna to some sort of résonant circuit, in which the detector is placed. This résonant circuit may be similar to the closed oscillating circuit of the transmitter, though very muçh reduced in size, as the currents which it is called upon to carry are extremely feeble and the correspond- ingly low voltages require no spécial care in insulating. The spécifie arrangement, however, dépends upon the form of detector to be used, and its ohmic résistance. In this respect there is the greatest variety, with the coherer, which is normally open-circuited, at one end of the scale, and the low-resistance thermal and magnetic detectors at224 W IRE LE 8 S TELEGRAPHY. the other ; and each requires a different mode of treatment to obtain the best results. Putting aside the coherers for the moment, let us con- sider the closed-circuit detectors. These may be connected simply in sériés, in the résonant circuit, as indicated diagrammatically in Fig. 129. îfow the damping of such a circuit is governed, not bv radiation, but by the dissipation of its energy in ehmie and other losses; hence it would seem at first glance that the lower the ré- sistance of the detector the better. But this is not necessarily the case. In the first place, low résistance usu- ally involves lack of sensitiveness, as when a magnetic detector is wound with few turns of coarse wire; and, in the second place, it is not the ab- solute value of the résistance, but the ratio of résistance to inductance, that détermines the damping fac- tor, or “ logarithmic décrément.” Hence, it is usually désirable to design the résonant circuit with a large in- ductance, and the proportionately small capacity necessary to give the proper frequencv. Here, however, enters the objection that small ca- pacity means small current, and we encounter the di- lemma of damped oscillations on the one hand and weak impulses on the other, just as we found in considering the transmitter that prolonged oscillations are opposed to good radiation. Fortunately, the solutions in the two cases are similar. Most detectors of the type which we are now Fig. 129.— Receiver with closed circuit de- tector D in a local résonant circuit, DCML. The induct- ance Jj is made vari- able for the purpose of tuning.SELECTIVE SIGNALING. 225 eonsidering are cumulative in their action, and the inten- sity of the signal dépends upon the total energy received from the wave-train—not on its intensity. As in the trans- mitter we strive to increase the energy of the wave-train, even at the expense of intensity, so in the receiver our aim must be to apply the energy to the detector in the most efficient manner, sacrificing the intensity of the current, if need be, in the interest of résonance. In the one case this resulted in large capaeity and small inductance, while in the other the tendency is to small capaeity and large in- ductance. As an extreme case, we see the “ jigger ” of Marconi (p. 197), where the coil is long and fine and the capaeity is reduced to that of the wire itself and the coherer con- nected to its terminais. In this case, the small capaeity in- volves high voltage, which is just what is wanted to ope- rate the coherer to best advantage. The capaeity of a coherer is a rather uncertain quantity; hence, to obtain sharp and definite tuning, it is often désirable to connect a condenser of larger capaeity (C', Fig. 131), as a shunt across the coherer terminais, thus making its variations negligible. Unfortunately, however, this has the effect of reducing the potential, and so diminishing the sensi- tiveness. Having considered some of the general principles which govem the operation of syntonie Systems, let us now look at a few spécifie forms of apparatus, and see how the prin- ciples hâve been applied. 9. Marconi Coherer System.*—A System which is used very successfully by the Marconi company is illustrated in * Marconi, before Roy. Instn. Great Britain, June 13, 1903. 15226 WI RELE 88 TELEGRAPHY. Figs. 130 and 131, the former showing the transmitting ap- paratus and the latter the receiver. Both embody the closed oscillating circuit which we hâve been considering, coupled to the antenna through a transformer. At the sending end of the line is a condenser, C, con- sisting in a battery of Leyden Jars, charged by an induc- tion coil, I, operated by a telegraph key in sériés with the automatic break. This condenser discharges through the is an additional condenser sometimes used to improve the résonance. primarv, P, of a transformer, which is made up of a few turns of stout stranded cable immersed in oil. The condenser C, primary coïl P, and spark gap B, make up the closed oscillating circuit, which has no separate inductance coil — the self-induction of the primary, whose loosely wouiid tums permit a good deal of magnetic leakage, being sufficient. The secondarv is connected to the antenna through a coil whose inductance may be varied at will, toSELECTIVE SIGXALING. 227 facilitate tuning. The frequency of the primary circuit may also be varied by changing the capacity of the con- denser, so that the two circuits may be adjusted, not only to resonate with each other and thus secure the most effi- cient radiation, but also to vibrato in unison with the re- ceiving apparatus. The receiver (Fig. 131) is similar in principle to the transmitter, though very different in construction. The antenna is connected through a variable inductance, L, to the transformer, J, which, in this case, is the peeuliarly- wound “ jigger ” described on page 197. The coherer is connected to the outer terminais of the secondary, while Fig. 132.— Marconi transmitters arrangée! for multiplex working on a single antenna. the inner terminais go to a condenser, C, across which is connected the local battery and the sensitive relav wkich opérâtes the recorder. The “ jigger ” itself, as we hâve already seen, is to a considérable degree syntonie in its action, but where sharper tuning is desired a condenser, C', is sometimes connected in shunt across the coherer. This,228 WIRELESS TELEGRAPHY. by virtue of its larger capacity, buries any irregularities in the capacity of the coherer, and makes the apparatus more perfectly sélective, though less sensitive. Figs. 132 and 133 show this apparatus arranged for multiplex working, with two transmitters at one station and two receivers at the other, both sets connected to the same pair of antennæ, though tuned to different fre- quencies. The coherer at best lends itself reluctantly to tuning; hence, where the most perfect selectivity is desired, Mar- coni often uses the magnetic detector, with a speciallv con- structed jigger designed to place the detector at a loop of the oscillation, where the current is a maximum and the voltage small—just the reverse of that used with the coherer. 10. Slaby-Arco System.*—In this svstem the coupling between the closed oscillating circuit and the antenna is *See Slaby, D\ie Funkentclegraphie, pp. 114, 115; also C. Ardt, Die Funkentelegraphie, Leipzig, 1903, p. 39.SELECTIVE SIGXALIXG. 220 partly inductive and partly by direct metallic connection. Instead of a transformer with separate windings, there is a single coil of wire which plays the part of both primary and secondary, on the principle of the “ auto-transformer ” of ordinary alternating-current practice. The condenser circuit is connected across a portion of the coi], and the antenna circuit across another portion (see Fig. 134), and the ratio of turns of these portions is ma de variable, to facilitate tuning. The capacity of the condenser, Ci, may also be varied, so that the condenser circuit may be made to oscillate in résonance with the antenna circuit, and both be tuned to the frequency of the receiver. The receiver is similar in principle, but modified in form. The coil, L2 (Fig. 135), is retained in the antenna circuit, to déterminé its frequency and to act as an auto- transformer in coupling the two circuits together, but there is an additional coil, M, in the receiver circuit, whose func-230 WIRELESS TELEGRÂPHY. tion is that of the “ multiplier/’ described on page 196. It is wound with fine wire of such a length that îts own period of oscillation is the same as that of the antenna, and a .node is produced at its outer end, where the coherer is connected, similar to that which occurs at the top of the antenna. We should keep clearly before us the essential différence between the oscillating circuits of transmitter and receiver, as it applies to this and to most other coherer Systems. In the case of the transmitter, the inductance is usually small, and the total length of the circuit is small compared to the wave-length. It is thus sufficient to assume that the current is the same in ail portions of the circuit, and the frequency is determined by the simple formula N — -----* —.* In the case of the receiver, however, the 2-|/LC coil is so long that an appréciable time is required for an impulse to travel from one end to the other, and, in the spécial case where this time is equal to a quarter period, a stationary wave will be produced with a node at the outer end and a loop at the inner end. The current flows in and ont at the latter, while only variations of potential occur at the former. It is the potential at the node that is utilized to operate the coherer. The case of the transmitter may be illustrated by a cord of small mass stretched by springs and carrying a weight in the middle. (Fig. 136.) The System vibrâtes as a whole * Remembering that L, in this case, is the effective value of the self-induction, after deducting from the true self-induction the effect of the mutual induction in the transformer or auto-transformer, Seep.219. The effect of résistance is usually small, and is here neg- lected.SELECTIVE SIGNALING. 281 with a frequency depending simplyon the ratio We need not consider the form of the weight nor the loca- tion of the springs. But if the mass and elasticity be dis- c* Fig. 136.— Model illustrating the action of an oscillating circuit with concentrated inductance Ij and capacity Cj, C2, which are analogous to the mass M, and the elasticity concentrated in the springs Sn eg. tributed uniformly along the cord (Fig. 137), an impulse appjied at the middle takes an appréciable time to travel to Fig. 137.— Model illustrating the operation of Marconi’s “ jigger,” whose distri bu ted capacity and inductance (elasticity and mass) are so proportioned to the frequency that the current (velocity) imparted through the mutual induction (mass M) to the secondary (welghted spring) is transformed into potential (tension) at the free terminais of the coil (ends of spring). the end. In the spécial case where this time is equal to a quarter period of the impressed impulses, the string will * Where the “ elasticity,” or ratio of force to displacement, is equal to 4 X tension -*• lengtli of cord. To complété the analogy, note that the capacity of a condenser, or ratio of its charge to potential, is analogous to the reciprocal of an elasticity.232 WIRELE8S TELEGRAPH Y. vibrate with a loop where the force is applied and a node at each end. Moreover, if the damping of the System be small, the forces occurring at the node may be much greater than the impressed force, and the System will act Fig. 138.— Model illustrating the operation of Slaby’s “ Multiplier.” The current (velocity) imparted directly to the multiplying coil M (weighted spring) by the antenna (reciproeating rod R) is converted into potential (tension) at the outer end of the coil (spring). The potential at this point may be much greater than that applied at the other end of the coil. as a “ multiplier,” as in the case of Slaby’s coil, M (Fig. 138), or Marconi’s jigger, J (Fig. 137). Indeed, in many respects the multiplier is the équivalent of half of the jigger, though in the one case the oscillation is impressed on the coil by induction from a primary, and in the other the current is fed directly into one end of the coil from the antenna. Th' similarity mav be illustrated by comparing the models, Figs. 137 and 138. In the former, the oscillation is impressed on the weighted spring at its middle point, through the freelv-suspended mass M (cf. page 214), and the spring vibrâtes like a piano cord with a loop in theSELECTIVE SIGNAUX G. 233 middle and a node at each end. In the latter, the motion is forcibly applied, directly at one end of the weighted spring, which vibrâtes with a loop at this end and a node at the other. The increase in voltage at the outer end of the coil is analogous to the well-known “ Ferranti ” effect (so-called), which is observed when one end of a two-conductor cable of suitable proportions is connected to the terminais of an alternator. When the length of the cable bears the proper relation to its distributed capacity and inductance and to the frequency of the alternator, electrical résonance occurs, and the voltage at the free end of the cable may become much greater than that of the generator. The energy which leaves the generator as a current flowing into the cable is transformed into potential energy, stored in the cable as a condenser, and measured by the increased poten- tial at the distant end. 11. Braun’s System.*— Prof. Ferdinand Braun has pro- duced a System whose distinctive feature is the absence of a ground connection. The sending apparatus (Fig. 139) comprises a closed oscillating circuit coupled to the an- tenna circuit through a transformer, P, S. The antenna, A, is conAected to one terminal of the secondary, and the other terminal, instead of being grounded, is attached to a capacity area in the form of a cylinder of métal, made in two parts which telescope one over the other so that the area of the surface may be varied to facilitate tuning. The antenna circuit thus approximates a Hertzian oscil- lator in which one conductor is greatly attenuated and the * F. Braun, Über drahtlose Télégraphié, Physikalische Zeitschrift, 1902, p. 143. Also A. Voiler, Elektrische Wellentelegraphie, Ham- burg, 1903.234 WIRELESS TELEGRAPH Y. other shortened and expanded, though it is doubtless true that the capacity area, acting as one coating of a condenser of which the earth is the other coating, perforais to some extent the funetion of a gronnd connection, thus extending the range of the apparatus beyond the limits of free Hertzian radiation. The condenser, Ci C2, consists in a number of small tubular Leyden jars, and the transformer comprises a primary winding of a few turns of heavy copper cable or tube, with a secondary winding with a larger number of turns of smaller conductor. Tuning is accomplished by Fig. 139.— Braun System — transmitter. The antenna, instead of being grounded, is connected through the secondary S of a transformer to an adjustable capacity area K. changing the number of tubes in the primary condenser and by adjusting the telescopic capacity. The receiver, Fig. 140, combines the elastic and inductive methods of coupling. The antenna circuit, with its adjust- able capacity area, contains a condenser, Ci C2, across whose terminais is shunted the primary, P, of a trans- A CiSELECTIVE SI GN ALIX G. 235. former, which, with the condenser, constitutes the primary résonant circuit. The coherer, T, is placed in a secondary circuit, inductively coupled with the first, and thus a con- sidérable irregularity in the capacity of the coherer may occur without destroving the résonance of the primary circuit. The coherer itself is somewhat different from those pre- viously described. It consists in a hard rubber tube with Fig. 140.— Braun System — receiver. The primary résonant circuit C1C2P is coupled elasticaily ” to the antenna through the agency of the condensers Ci, C2, and inductively to the coherer circuit through the transformer P, S. électrodes of Steel, between which is a quantitv of liard- ened steel filings. One of the électrodes is provided with an adjusting screw, whereby the distance between the élec- trodes, and hence the sensitiveness, may be regulated. 12. Lodge-Muirhead System.*—Lodge has described a number of forms of syntonie apparatus — commencing * See Electrician, Lond., March 27, 1903, pp. 930-934.236 WIRELESS TELEGRAPHY. with his syntonie Leyden jars, then the syntonie cônes con- nected by an inductance (p. 208), then this inductance was made the primary (or secondary) of a transformer, the other winding of which was connected to the coherer (or to the condenser and spark-gap). With the advent of the grounded antenna, this arrangement evolved itself into that shown in Figs. 141 and 142, the former representing the transmitting and the latter the receiving apparatus. The connections are so similar to others that we hâve considered that we need not discuss them in detail, except to note that a condenser, Ci, and sometimes also another, C2? is connected in sériés in the antenna circuit. It is convenient to make these condensers adjustable, to allow of tuning the antenna circuit without changing the induc- tance. The antenna circuit is connected with the oscillat- Fig. 141. — Lodge-Muirhead System — transmitter. A closed oscillating circuit, C3BC4P, coupled to the antenna through a transformer PS. An adjustable condenser Ci in sériés in the antenna circuit. System — receiver. Condensers Ci and C2 in sériés with the antenna and primary P of trans- former. Mercury-steel coherer D, in secondary circuit, operating syphon recorder R. Fig. 142.— Lodge-MuirheadSELECTIVE SIGNAUX G. 237 ing circuit of the transmitter or with tlie résonant circuit of the receiver througb a transformer, and each . of these cir- •cuits has its own condenser, arranged in much the same way as in other Systems that we hâve considered. Another arrangement of receiv- ing apparatus is shown in Fig. 143. Here the transformer is dis- pensed with, and the coherer circuit is connected in shunt across the ré- sonant circuit, which has a direct electrical connection with the antenna. The detector used with this Sys- tem is the mercury-steel coherer, having a steel dise rotating continu- ously in light contact with a globule of mercury (see page 184), and opérât ing a siphon recorder. 13. Limitations of Syntonie Sig- Ttaling.— The Systems above de- scribed are ail designed to use detectors of the coherer type, whose characteristic is a normally open circuit which be- comes closed under the influence of the oscillations. Its action is a sort of trigger effect: the oscillation in the résonant circuit increases in amplitude until it is able to break down the insulation of the coherer, and the sig- nal is received. While the résonant rise of the oscil- lation is going on, the coherer is, in effect, a condenser of small capacity, and must be so considered in cal- culating the period of the résonant circuit. This capacity is not a definite quantity, but is constantly varying as the blows of the tapper change the arrangement of the filings in the tube ; hence the problem of tuning is a difflcult one, and Fig. 143.— Another form of Lodge-Muirhead receiver. Inductance L, capacity C2. and coherer circuit C3D, ali in mul- tiple.238 WIRELESS TELEGRAPHY. leads to the adoption of the various expédients which we hâve considered, for making the coherer capaeitv a mafc- ter of minor importance not vitally afFecting the résonance of the apparatus. With detectors of the closed-circuit type the problem is simpler. Here the oscillatory currents pass freely through the detector, which usually has little effect on the period of the circuit. Hence the design of the receiver is governed by the simpler principles which apply to the case of the transmitter, and the main concem is to so proportion the resonating circuit that the current shall hâve the maximum effect on the détector compatible with the conditions of good résonance. The principles involved hâve been con- sidered already, and we need not go farther into details which interest only the specialist. We should note, however, one fundamental fact. Any detector is primarily a device for translating energy.* It reçoives the energy of rapidly oscillating currents and transforms it into some form — mechanical, thermal, Chemical, or otherwise — in which it can be utilized. Now the criterion of a good resonator is that its damping— which is only another way of saying its rate of dissipation of energy — be small. The very fact of a receiver being operative involves an expenditure of energy and so im- poses a limit on the résonance of the circuit. * The coherer is an apparent exception, as it seems to act more as a relay than as an energy-transformer ; but recent experiments show that the degree of cohérence, and hence the intensity of the signal, dépends not only upon the intensity of the impulse, but also on its duration. There is thus an important sense in which even the coherer may be accepted as conforming to the general rule. See Hurmuzescu in Annales Scientifiques de L’Université de Ja£sy> reprinted in L’Eclairage Électrique, June 27, 1903.SELECTIVE SIGNALING. 230 At first glance it would seem a» if a strongly résonant receiver must. necessarily be an insensitive one, but for- tunately this is not the case. Most detectors of the closed- circuit type are cumulative in their action : it is not only the strength of current flowing through the detector that détermines the intensity of the signal, but the duration of the current must be considered as well. A resonator which perforais a hundred oscillations and gives up (on an aver- age) a hundredth part of its energy at each swing may give as strong a signal as one which affects the detector at ten times that rate, but only perforais ten vibrations. The important thing is to see that the energy is utilized in the detector and not wasted in ohmic résistance of the eonductors and dielectric losses in the condenser. This is simply a question of careful design of the apparatus, which has been solved successfully by a number of work- ers. The resuit is a receiving apparatus whose damping is small enough to make it a good resonator, yet a fair proportion of the energy received from the ether is made effective in producing a signal. Its characteristics ap- proach, to a fair degree of approximation, those of a piano string — a vibrator which, growing out of the crude, tink- ling harpsichord, has been so perfected that its note is quite persistent, considering that it is set in vibration by a single blow. And this brings us to the next point: we know that a strongly résonant receiver alone does not make a good syntonie System, but we must look at the limitations im- posed by the transmitter. The vibration of the receiver dépends upon the energy which it absorbs, whether this be given by a sudden impulse or distributed over a longer period. If we depress the loud pedal of a piano, so as to lift ail the dampers from the strings, and then beat a240 WIRELESS TELEGRAPHY. drum in the room, ail the strings will respond — feebly, it is trtte, but ail equally well. Sa the strongly-damped radiations of a simple antenna will, if they hâve sufficient energy, affect even a good tuned receiver to some extent, though ordinarily the effect is trifling. If necessary, as in the case of a malicious attempt to block a receiver, the interférence may be eut out by making the inductive coupling between antenna and résonant circuit very loose — thus, if our piano cord be protected by a felt pad, it may receive quite a hard blow without being set in vibration, yet it will respond to a prolonged, though feeble, synchron- ous vibration. Such précautions are usually unnecessary, and it is bet- ter to avoid interférence by using only properly con- structed transmitters. If a person may be restrained from disturbing the peace by making unnecessary noises in the Street, why should not the same principle apply to etheric disturbances ? Ilowever this may be, prolonged oscillations hâve othèr advantages than those which concern the question of selec- tivity. Returning again to the piano, with the loud pedal depressed, suppose a note to be sung into the instru- ment. The string tuned to this note will respond loudly, even though the note sung be quite feeble. If the same note be struck on another piano, the same response will occur, though less loudly. If the note be struck re- peatedly, the response will be louder. ÏTow, the damp- ing of even a good tuned transmitter may be considerably gréa ter than that of a piano string, hence the energy rep- resented by its radiations is small, considering their inten- sity. Suppose, for example, a transmitter makes 100 oscillations before their amplitude is greatly reduced. IfSELECTIVE SIGNALING. 241 the wave frequency be 1,000,000 per second — correspond- ing to a wave-length of about 1,000 feet — the oscillation persists for second. If now the spark- or group- frequency be 100 per second — a rather large figure for mechanical interrupters — the oscillation endures for only one hundredth of the interval between sparks, and for 99$ of the time the transmitter is absolutely inactive. No resonator is persistent enough to bridge over this interval, so répétitions of the impulse, as when the same note was struck repeatedly on the piano, are useless for increasing the intensity of the signal. It is possible that a compound oscillâting System, like that of Prof. Fleming (p. 153), may be so designed as to charge the sma.ll secondary condenser several times for each charge of the primary, and thus bring the wave-trains close enough together to hâve a cumulative effect on the receiver, though to what extent this may be done has not been made public by the inventor. If it were possible to generate an absolutely undamped radiation, analogous to the Sound of the voice in our piano experiment, the intensity of the signal would be greatly increased, even though the amplitude of the waves were very small. Under such circonstances, a simple Hertzian oscillator would radiate energy at the rate of over twenty horse-power.* Such a generator has never yet been made practicable. Mechanical generators will not do, on account of their low frequency. To feed energy into an electrical oscil- lator at each reversai, to replace that lost by radiation, seems possible from a theoretical point of view, and there is experimental ground for encouragement in this * See Hertz, Electric Waves, Eng. trans., p. 150. 16242 WIRELESS TELEGRAPHY. direction; but as we are dealing with facts, not possibili- tés, we must pass that by until such an apparatus is put in operation. However perfect the résonance between transmitter and receiver may be made, there will always be a practical limit to the number of stations that may be tuned to selec- tivity, as there is a limit to the number of strings in a piano. To escape this restriction we may hâve recourse to the third and last method of securing selectivity. 14. Other Means of Securing Selectivity.— Where the number of stations witliin the sphere of each other’s in- fluence is so great that it is impracticable to differen- tiate them by their wave-frequencies, some other char- acteristics must be added to their radiations, by which they may be distinguished. There are several ways of doing this. Mr. Tesla has proposed the plan of having each station émit two wave-trains of different frequencies, either simultaneously or in succession, and providing the re- ceiver with two separate tuned circuits, so arranged that résonance in either alone will not give a signal, but both must respond together.* The number of combinations is thus increased, after the fashion of a combination lôck, as the square of the number of individual frequencies. Another method is to give to each station a definite rate of récurrence of the sparks, or group-frequency, and to tune some part of the receiving apparatus to respond to this frequency. For example, if the signais are re- ceived on a téléphoné, the ordinary diaphragm may be replaced by a weighted tongue, which vibrâtes at a defi- * Tesla, U. S. pats. Nos. 723,188, Mardi 17, 1903, and 725,605, April 14, 1903. Application filed July 16, 1900.SELECTIVE SIGNALING. 243 nite frequency. The téléphoné will then respond only to signais whose group-frequencies correspond to the natural period of the tongue, even thongh the detector may be in active operation. This method was proposed by Professor Rathenau, of Berlin,* for use in connection with a conductive System of wireless telegraphy (see p. 112, footnote). M. Blondel applied the same principle to Hertz-wave telegraphy,f and proposed several methods — mechani- Fig. 144.— Blondel’s mechanical method of tuning to group fre- quencies. T,, T2, T3 are mono-téléphonés, each tnned to respond to a different spark-frequency, D is an auto-coherer or other self-restoring detector, A the antenna, and B a battery. cal and electrical — for tuning the receiver to the com- paratively low frequencies involved. He prefers to use * Professor Eathenau, Elektrotechnische Zeitschrift, v. 15, p. 616,, 1894. f See note addressed to the Frencli Academy in 1898, Sur la Syntonie dans la Télégraphie sans fil, Comptes Rendus, 21 Mai, 1900,, p. 1383; also Eng. pat. No. 21,909, May 3, .1900. Accepted Nov. 9^ 1901.244 WIRELE88 TELEGRAPHY. Mercadier’s “ mono-telephones,”* winch were designed by their inventor for use in multiplex wire-telegraphy and are so constructed as to hâve a very definite period of vibration. A number of these téléphonés, each tuned to a different note, may be connected in the local re- ceiver circuit (Fig. 144), and several messages may thus be received at the same time. It is, of course, necessarv to use a self-restoring detector. Fig. 145.— Blondel’s method of electrical tuning to group frequencies, showing two receivers. The local circuits Ci lMT, and C2L2V, with capacities C,, C2 and inductances 1.2< are tuned to their respective soark frequencies. On the right is shown a mono-telephone T, for re- cèiving by ear, and on the left a vibrating relay V, with recording ap- paratus R. M. Blondel also applies the principle of electrical résonance, as in Fig. 145, which shows two receivers con- nected to the same antenna. Each receiver circuit, in- cluding battery and téléphoné (or relay), has its capacity and inductance so adjusted that its natural period is the * See FAéktrotech. ZcitschrApril 27, 1899, p. 305 ; also Annales Télégraphiquesy 1898, p. 287. fl ?;?777ss7” R.SELECTIVE SIGNALING. 245 same as that of the interrupter at the sending station to vvhich it is to respond. By these means the selectivity of the System is made independent of the wave-frequency of the signais, and even a strongly damped radiation is incapable of affecting a receiver which is not tuned to reçoive it. 15. Conclusion.— We hâve traced briefly the develop- ment of the art of wireless telegraphy from its germ in Maxwell’s epoch-making conceptions regarding the elec- tromagnetic field to its fruition in a practical working System, containing ail the essential éléments of a suc- cessful enterprise. Let ns now glance at the subject from a commercial point of view, and see what has been practioally accomplished, and what are the prospects of future progress. To say that ail the problems hâve been solved, and that the System now stands complété, would be idle prattle; but much has been donc. The problem has passed through the hands of the prophet, the mathematician, the physi- cist, and the practical expérimenter; it is now in the hands of the engineer and financier, to perfect and cor- relate the achievements of ail these workers, and fuse them into the complex organism which a commercial en- terprise of this kind must eventually become. From the vision of Maxwell the seer to the fulfilment of Hertz was twenty years; from Hertz’s discovery to Marconi’s first démonstration in England was nine years,* from this exhibition of a working, though crude, Hertz-wave telegraph to the présent day is little more than seven years — yet what progress has been made ! * Marconi applied for his first English patent, No. 12,039, June 2, 1896, and the démonstration referred to took place shortly after.246 WIRELESS TELEGRAPHY. To-day, commercial wireless telegraphy is an estab- lished fact. The traveler on an océan liner can commu- nicate at will with his friends on shore, and in some cases can read a morning paper from the. steamer’s press, con- taining the latest shore news. The navies of most of the great nations hâve equipped, or are equipping, their fighting ships with what they consider an indispensable instrument of modem warfare. Snow-bound Alaska and remote islands of the sea are put into communication with the outer world. Land stations hâve been set up and ope- rated, paralleling wire lines. Transatlantic wireless tel- egraphy has been demonstrated by the actual transmission of messages between England and America, while smaller stations hâve carried on their business without interfér- ence from the powerful “thunder houses” nearby. It is needless to multiply instances showing what has been actually done : enough has been said to show that wire- less telegraphy is no longer a laboratory experiment, but an accomplished fact, and several companies are now carrying on business for ail those who care to employ their services. To make prédictions as to the future is not the pur- pose of this paragraph. Rather let the reader look for himself at what has already been achieved, and draw his own conclusions. The writer is not one of those enthusiasts who believe that wireless telegraphy is des- tined to tum the cable into a rusting relie of the past and to relegate the wire lines to the scrap heap. The téléphoné did not supplant the telegraph, nor did the trolley-car make the steam railroad obsolète; but each has found its own sphere of usefulness, and the estab- lished Systems, far from suffering from the innova- tions, hâve gone on increasing their trafic. Is it notSELECTIVE SIGNALING. 247 reasonable to think that our twentieth-century commerce will supply enough business to occupy ail the Systems that may be put in the field? The future of wireless teleg- raphy is now îh the hands of the practical man, and it remains for him to show how he will occupy the territory thrown open by the pioneers who hâve preceded him. Many of the world’s best thinkers and workers hâve pre- pared the way — let him now go in and possess the land.INDEX PAGE. Alternating Currents, Tend to Sur- face of Conductor... 49, 83, 145 ----, Do not Explain Transmission. 159 ----, Distribution in Parallel Cir- cuits ..............................200 ---- in Guiding Surface. . . 157, 159, 173 ---- for Transmitters .............. 151 Ampère on Mutual Action of Cur- rents .......................... 13 Antenna, the........................138 ----, Character of Radiations from. 156 ----, Dumping of Oscillations in... 205 ----, Development of............... 141 ----, Importance of Low Résistance in .........................145 ----, Multiple-Wired............... 143 ----, Value of Inductance in....... 207 ----, Wave-Length of Radiations... 143 ---- with Closed Oscillating Cir- cuit ...........................213 Anti-Coherers...................... 185 Arco-Slaby — Wireless Telegraphy.. 228 Atténuation of Waves, Effect of Light on........... . 176 ----, --- Guiding Surface on. 162, 174 ----, Law of......... 129, 159, 161, 175 Attraction, Electrodynamic........... 9 ----, Electrostatic .............4, 166 ----, Mutual, of Faraday Tubes ... 166 Auto-Coherers...................... 182 “ Barretter ” ................ 187, 188 Birkeland and Pérot, Détermination of Wave-Form..................... 42 Bjerknes, Détermination of Wave- Form ....................... 69 ----, Measurement of Damping. 45, 67 ----, Proof of Skin-Effect....50, 83 ——, Use of Electrometer .... 44, 45 Blondel, Sélective Signaling........243 Blondlot, Apparatus for Waves in Wires...................49, 69 ----, Measurement of Velocity of... 55 ---- on Inductive Capacity of Ice.. 82 ----, Oscillator................34, 85 ----, Resonator.................34, 80 Bolometric Method of Measuring Os- cillations ..................... 43 Bose.......... 35, 47, 83, 85, 91, 99, 100 ----, Detector...................... 89 ----, Diffraction Gratings.......... 97 ----, Oscillator............... 88, 91 PAGE. Branly’s Coherer........... 45, 89, 131 ----, on Opacity of Metals......... 83 Braun, Multiple Antenna ........... 144 ----, Wireless Telegraph System... 233 Capacity, Analogous to Elasticity. . ----, Distributed.............. 193, Castelli Coherer ................... Charge, Moving, Equivalent to Cur- rent........................ 173, Circuits, Closed Oscillating .... 22, 151, 212 et ----------, Coupling to Antenna ... ----, Inductively lnterlinked ...... ----, Unclosed ................ 18, Closed Oscillating Circuit ......22, 151, 212 et Clouds Transparent to Electromag- netic Waves...................... Coherer, Anti-...................... ----, Auto-......................... ----, Capacity of.............. 227, ----, Carbon Grain.................. ---- Inactive when Buried........... ---- is Potential-Operated.......... ----, Lodge’s Theory of............. ----, Mercury.............. 182, 184, ----, Methods of Using ............. ----, Principle of ................. ----, Self-Restoring................ ---- Works Best at Node--------195, ----, Bose’s........................ ----, Branly’s...................45, ----, Castelli’s.................... ----, “ Italian Navy ” ............. ----, Lodge’s Knob ................. ----, Lodge’s Mercury.......... 184, ----, Marconi’s ........... 131, 181, ----, Popoff’s...................... Cohn on Inductive Capacity of Water ........................... Compound Oscillating System.. 153, Condenser, Discharge of..........22, ----, Seat of Charge in ............ Conduction, Wireless Telegraphy by.......................... 112, Conductivity of Electrolytes. 83, J57, ---- of Guiding Surface........162, Conductors Opaque to Electromag- netic Waves ................. 82, Convection Currents ........... 173, 15 231 231 182 177 148 seq. 213 215 20 148 seq. 158 1S5 182 237 185 161 194 181 237 194 179 182 199 89 89 182 182 180 237 226 138 82 241 191 18 243 177 174 157 177 [249]250 INDEX. PAGE. Currents, Alternating, Tend to Sur- face ....................... 49, 83, 145 ----, ---- Distribution of, in Paral- lel Circuits ................200 ----, Closed or Unclosed......... 18, 20 ----, Diffusion of............... 51, 54 ----, Displacement. 14, 118, 124, 163, 173 ---- in Guiding Surface... 157, 159, 173 ---- in Dielectrics.................... 15 ----, Kinetic Energy of...........10, 113 ----, Moving Charge Equivalent to...................173, 177 ---- -multiplying Devices ............199 ----, Mutual Action of ............. 7 ----, Velocity of, in Wires. 14, 50 et seq. Curvature of Earth ............ 156, 173 Cylinders, Marconi’s Concentric.... 211 Damped Vibration Appears Complex. Damping of Oscillations........... ---- in Antenna .............. 205, ---- in Receiving Apparatus........ ----, Bjerknes’ Measurement of.. 45, ----, Cause of Multiple Résonance. ----, Décombe’s Proof of........... ----, Effect on Résonance, 38, 204, Daylight, Effect on Wave Transmis- sion .............................. Decay of Oscillations (see Damping). Décombe, Experiments on Wave- Form............................. Décrément, Logarithmic.........66, See also Damping. De Forest, Responder .............. ----, Transmitter ................. De la Rive and Sarasin, Discovery of Multiple Résonance....... ----, Experiments on Waves in Space ........................... Detectors of Oscillation (see also Coherers).. 38 et seq., 179 et ---- Classified ................... ----, Closed-Circuit.......... 224, ----, Current-Operated........199, ----, Electrolytic .a.............. ----, Magnetic ............... 191, ----, Mechanical .............. 44, ----, Microphonie (see Coherers) .. ----, Thermal.................. 43, ----, Bose’s ...................... ----, De Forest’s.................. ----, Fessenden’s................. ----, Marconi’s Magnetic......192, ----, Righi’s ..................... ----, Rutherford’s............ ----, Schloemilch’s .......... ----, Vreeland’s ............. Dichroism..................... Dielectrics, Currents in...... ----, Inductive Capacity of .. ----, Propagation of Waves in ----, Properties of .......... ----, Reflection of Waves by , Diffraction.........•......... Diffusion of Current........... Directed Signais ............. 96, 51, 66 27 240 224 66 63 69 240 176 69 224 187 151 62 74 seq. 179 238 224 187 228 185 179 180 89 187 186 228 87 192 189 188 100 15 79 79 14 95 158 54 203 PAGE. Discharge of Condenser (see also Oscillations)................ 22 ----, Compared to Pendulum....... 24 ----, Compared to Tuning Fork, etc. 26 ----, Henry on..................... 191 ----, Lord Kelvin on..............; 23 Displacement Currents..........14, 118 --------, about Oscillator . . . 163, 173 --------, in Moving Waves ........ 173 --------, Magnetic Effect of ......124 ----, Relation of Force to.... 163, 175 Distributed Capacity and Induct- ance ......................... 196, 230 Dolbear’s Wireless Telegraph Sys- tem ...........................119, 126 Double Refraction ................. 100' Edison and Gilliland, Train Teleg- raphy............................ 120 Elastic Reaction of Dielectrics..... 15 Electrical Phenomena, Generaliza- tions..................... 1 ---------, Mechanical Explanation of. 1 ---- Waves (see Waves). Electrodynamic Attraction............. 9 ----, Model Illustrating............. 10 Electrolytes, Conductivity of... 83, 157 177 Electrolytic Detectors ............. 187 Electromagnetic Waves (see Waves). Electrostatic Field, Energy of.. 17, 118 166 ---- Method of Signaling_______ 117, 127 ---------, Dolbear’s ................119 ---------, Edison’s................. 119 ---- Phenomena, Hydraulic Analo- gies of ............................. 3 Energy of Faraday Tubes .............166 ---- of Electromagnetic Waves (see also Atténuation).. 129, 171, 175 ---- of Electrostatic Field.. 17, 118, 166 ---- of Magnetic Field. 10, 113, 127, 166 ---- ----- Tends to Become Mini- mum ...................... 200. ----, Lost in Résistance......18, 145 Ether, Properties of........... 9, 20 ----, The Seat of Inductive Effects. 10 Experimentum Crucis............... 71 Faraday on Dielectrics ............. 14 Faraday Tubes.......................164 ---- in Leyden Jars................. 210 ---- in Wave Propagation........... 167 ----, Magnetic Field from Motion of...................... 166, 170 ----, Normal to Perfect Conductors. 173 ----, Properties of................ 165 ----, Self-closed..............165, 167 ----, “ Snapping Off ” of..... 206, 208 ---- Terminate in Electrical Charges.......................164, 173 Feddersen on Discharge of Leyden Jar....................... 22, 148, 191 “ Ferranti Effect ” ................233 Fessenden Thermal Detector... 187, 188 Fizeau and Gounelle’s Experiments. 52INDEX. 251 rAUK. Fleming High-Power Transmitter... 153 241 Fog Transparent to Electromagnetic Waves.......................... 158 Foucault’s Experiment ............. 6 Free-Wave Hypothesis ............ 157 ----, Propagation of............. 163 ---- (see also Waves, Electromag- netic). Frequency of Oscillation ......... —- Altered by Mutual Induction. 219 ----, Effect of, on Absorption .... 127 ---- ----- on Conductivity of Elec- trolytes ........................83, 157 ---- ----- on Radiation ..........125 ----in Wireless Telegraphy ...... 157 ----, of Blondlot’s Oscillator ....... 85 ----, of Bose’s Oscillator ........... 89 ----, of Closed Circuit Oscillator . . 23 216, 230 ----, of Hertz’s Oscillator .... 37, 85 ----, of Light Vibration ...... 19, 89 ----, of Righi’s Oscillator .......... 87 ---- (see also Wave-Length). Fresnel, Theory of Light....... 98, 104 ----, Interférence Experiments. . 93, 94 ---- on the Ether................13, 20 Garbasso, Experiments on Disper- sion ............................... 65 ----, Experiments on Secondary Waves............................. 106 Generators, Alternating Current, in Transmitters.................151 ----, High Power .................... 151 Geneva, Experiments at............!. 74 Gilliland and Edison, Train Teleg- raphy ............................. 120 Gordon’s Method of Measuring In- ductive Capacity............... 81, 82 Gounelle and Fizeau’s Experiments. 52 Gouy on Diffraction of Light.. 96, 104 158 ---- on Inductive Capacity of Water.............................. 82 Group Frequency, Tuning to.. . 203, 242 Grounded Oscillator .............. 141 ---- Waves....................156, 172 Guarini’s Antenna ................. 142 Guided Waves ................. 156, 172 rAUB. Hertz, Mechanical Detector........ 185 ----, Oscillators ........ 34, 85, 160 ----, Sketch of Life .............. 31 ----, Theory of Wave Propagation. 168 Hertzian Waves (see Waves). ----, Propagation of ............. 163 ----, Telegraphy by .............. 130 High-Power Generators..............151 Hurmuzescu on Coherers........ 185, 238 Hystérésis in Magnetic Detector... 193 Imperfect Contact .................. 179 Index of Refraction of Dielectrics. 79 Inductance, Effective, Mutual Induc- tion Diminishes......................220 ----, Value of, in Antenna .........206 ---- (see also Self-Induction.) Induction Coil, Requirements of... 149 ----, Electromagnetic, Signaling by. 113 ---- ----, Phelps’ Method .......... 116 ---------, Preece’s Method.... 115, 127 ----, Electrostatic, Signaling by.. 117 127 ---------, Dolbear’s and Edison’s Methods.....................119 ----, Self and Mutual ................ 7 See also Self-Induction; Mu- tual Induction; Inductance. ----, Tubes of (see Faraday Tubes). Inductive Capacity of Dielectrics... 79 ---- and Index of Refraction........ 79 ----, Measurement of ................ 80 Inductively Interlinked Circuits____215 Inertia of Faraday Tubes............ 166 ----, Self-Induction Analogous to.. 7 25, 206, 215 Interférence of Secondary and Di- rect Waves .......................... 95 ---- of Waves in Air............72, 92 ---------Intersecting Obliquely ... 93 ---------Moving in Same Direction. 93 ---------in Wires.................... 59 Ions in Electrolysis............84, 177 ----in Gases ....................... 177 Iron Wire, Velocity of Current in.. 55 Italian Navy Coherer................ 182 ‘ Jigger,” Marconi’s.....197, 225, 227 ----, Theory of ................. 230 Jones’ Experiments on Wave-Form. 69 Heating Effect of Current.... 18, 19 ---- of Oscillations ..... 43. 145, 186 Henry, Joseph, on Magnetic Effect of Oscillations ............... 191 Hertz, Apparatus for Waves in Wires.....................48, 142 ----, Distribution of Energy in Waves.................... 175 ----, Effect of Light on Spark. . 36, 176 ----, Experiments at Karlsruhe ... 73 ----, Experiments with Small Oscil- lator ...............,.... 74, 130, 204 ■---, Measurement of Wave Length. 59 73 Karlsruhe, Hertz’s Experiments at. 73 Kelvin, Lord, Hypothesis Regarding Ether...................... 12 ----, on Discharge of Condenser ... 23 Kirchhoff on Velocity of Current. 14, 50 Klemencic and Trouton on Polar- ization............................. 98 Lecher, Waves in Wires .............214 Leyden Jar, Discharge of (see Dis- charge of Condenser)... 22, 191 ----, Lodge’s Syntonie .............209 Light and Electricity, Relations Be- tween............................... 13252 INDEX. PAGE. Light and Electricity, Effect of, on Wave Transmission..........176 ----, Nature of .......... 19, 81, 102 ----, Reflection by Minute Particles. 158 ----, Synthesis of ................ 101 ----, Ultra-Violet, Effect on Spark. 36 ----, Velocity of ............. 13, 79 Lightning, Oscillatory Nature of... 138 Lines of Force, Magnetic.. .114, 124, 170 ----, Electrostatic (see Faraday Tubes)..................... 117, 163 Lippmann’s Interférence Striæ .... 92 Liquids, Conductivity of........83, 157 Lodge’s Conical Capacity Areas. 136, 208 ---- Early Experiments ............ 130 ---- Knob Coherer ................. 180 ---- Mercury Coherer.......... 184, 237 ---- -Muirhead System ..............235 ----, Naming of Coherer ............ 45 ---- on Signaling by Induction_____127 ----Oscillator..................35, 86 ---- Syntonie Leyden Jars......180. 208 212, 215 ---- Theory of Coherer ............ 181 Logarithmic Décrément ......... 66, 224 Loops and Nodes, Définition........ 60 See Nodes; Stationary Waves. Magnetic Detectors........ 190, 191, 228 ----Field, About Oscillator .. 124, 170 ---------Accompanies Moving Fara- day Tubes .................... 166, 170 ---------, Kinetic Energy of... 10, 113 127, 160 Marconi Coherer ............... 130, 1S1 ---- Coherer System ............... 225 ---- Concentric Cylinder Appara- tus........................211 ----, Définition of Coherer ........179 ---- Early Apparatus______ 132, 204, 245 ----, Effect of Daylight on Trans- mission ........................... 176 ---- “ Jigger ” .......... 197, 225, 227 ---- ----, Theory of ..............232 ---- Magnetic Detectors ........... 192 ---- Multiple Antenna ............. 144 ---- Multiplex Working .............227 ---- Transatlantic Telegraphy. 155, 183 ----, Use of Antenna -----:........ 139 ----, Use of Capacity Areas.. . 141, 208 Maxwell’s Early Conceptions........ 2 ---- Method of Measuring Induc- tive Capacity....................... 81 ---- Relation ...................... 79 ---- Theory of Displacement Cur- rents...................... 14 ---- Theory, the Experimentum Crucis..................... 71 ---- Theory of Light......19, 81, 101 Mechanical Detectors ..........44, 185 ---- Explanation of Electrical Phe- nomena............................ 1 Mercadier, Mono-Telephones..........244 Mercury Coherer s......... 182. 184, 237 Methods of Observing Waves. 38 et seq. Michelson’s Interférence Apparatus. 94 PAGE. Micrometer, Spark........... 33, 39, 42 Microphonie Detectors................ 179 Mono-Telephones, Mercadier’s .........244 Moving Charge Equivalent to Cur- rent........................ 173, 177 Muirhead and Lodge, Syntonie Ap- paratus ....................... 208, 235 Multiple Résonance.......... 61, 73, 205 ——, Explanation of ................... 62 ----, Experiments of Sarasin and de la Rive....................... 62 ----, Experiments of Strindberg... 68 Multiplex Signaling........... 223, 227 Multiplier, Slaby's .......... 195, 232 Multiplying Devices ................. 199 Mutual Induction....................... 7 ----in Oscillation Transformer... 220 ----, Model Illustrating .............. 8 ---- Tends to Become Zéro.............220 Newton’s Rings, Electrical Imitation of............................94, 99 Nodes and Loops, Définition........... 60 ---- in Air........................ 73 ----in Antenna................ 160, 195 ---- in Wires ..................... 60 Obstacles, Absorption of Waves by. 134 156 ----, Waves May Pass, in Four Ways................................157 Oil in Spark-Gap ........... 37, 86, 135 Optical Phenomena, Imitation of... 91 Organ Pipe, Resonator Compared to. 39 95 ----, Oscillator Compared to......161 Oscillation Transformer ...... 148, 213 ----. Theory of ......................215 Oscillations: ---- Before Hertz .................... 22 ---- Confined to Skin of Conduc- tor.................... 50, 145 ----, Detectors of (see Detectors). ---- Hertzian......................... 31 ---------, Character of ........... 62 ---------------, Bjerknes’ Experi- ments on........................... 67 --------------, Décombe’s ditto ... 69 --------------, Garbasso’s ditto ... 65 --------------, Pérot’s and Jones’ ditto............... 69 --------------, Strindberg’s ditto .. 68 --------------, Zehnder’s ditto .... 65 ----, Means of Prolonging.. 206 et seq. ----, Undamped .......................241 Oscillator, Bose’s ............ 88, 91 ----, Blondlot’s ..................... 34 ----, Feddersen’s..................... 22 ----, Hertz’s Large .................. 34 ----, Hertz’s Small ........... 35, 74 ----, Lodges....................35, 86 ----, Mode of Vibration of.......... 160 ----, Principle of'............ 32, 163 ----, Righi’s......................... 85 ----, the Grounded ...................141INDEX. 253 PAGE. Oscillating Circuit, Closed....22, 148 151, 212 et seq. ----, Coupling to Antenna.............213 ---- of Receiver and Transmitter Contrasted......................230 Oscillatory Discharge ............. 22 ----, Henry on ...................... 191 Parabolic Reflectors ... 74, 87, 132, 204 Period of Vibration (see Frequency). Pérot and Birkeland, Détermination of Wave-Form ...................... 42 Pérot on Inductive Capacity of lce. 82 ----, Experiments on Wave-Form. . 69 ----, Method of Measuring Induc- tive Capacity ...................... 81 Phelps’ System of Train Telegraphy. 116 Polarizing Grid ...................... 97 Polarization by Reflection ........... 98 ----, Circular and Elliptic .......... 98 ---- of Electric Waves ............... 97 ----, Plane of ................... 77, 98 ---- ----, Rotation of ............ 97 Poldhu, High-Power Station at...... 176 Popoff, Researches on Lightning . . . 138 ----, Use of Antenna................. 138 Preece’s Method of Signaling.. 115, 127 Propagation of Grounded Waves... 156 172 ---- of Hertzian Waves ..... 71, 168 ---- of Inductive Effects, Finite Ve- locity of ................... 71 ---- of Waves in Wires........... 48 ---- of Waves, Different Modes of. 20 See also Waves, Propagation of. Radio-Conductors (see Coherers)____ 45 Radiation a Cause of Damping....... 30 ----, Means of Increasing......141, 146 ----, Hertzian (see Waves). ---- ----, Emitted by Sun ......... 47 ---- ----, Nature of .......... 76, 163 Rathenau, Sélective Signaling......243 Receiving Apparatus ................. 179 ----, Arrangement of................. 194 ----, Tuued ..........................223 Reflection : ---- at End of Wire................... 59 ---- by Conductors'................... 72 ---- by Dielectrics................... 95 ---- by Rarified Air..................158 ---- by Small Bodies ................ 158 ----, Polarization by ............... 98 ----, Total .......................... 99 Reflectors, Parabolic____ 74, 87, 132, 204 Refraction, Atmospheric ............. 159 ----, Double......................... 100 ----, Index of ....................... 79 ---- of Electromagnetic Waves ... 98 Résistance, Analogous to Friction. 6 28 ---- a Cause of Damping........28, 145 ---- a Cause of Diffusion.......... 51 ----, Effect of, in Antenna.......... 145 PAGE. Résistance, Effect of, in Guiding Surface .................... 162, 174 Résonance, as Means to Selectivity. 204 ---- Between Distant Antennæ. 207, 221 ---- Between Antenna and Closed Circuit ....................216 ----, Curves of ............... 207, 221 ----, Electric . ................... 38 ----, Multiple ............ 61, 73, 205 Resonators.....................38, 87 ----, Principle of ................. 38 Respondcr, de Forest’s ............. 187 liighi............... 35, 91, 98, 105, 130 ----, Interférence Experiments..... 93 ---- Oscillator................85, 133 ---- Resonator....................... 87 ----, Study of Secondary Waves.. 94 103, 106 Rowland, Moving Charge Equivalent to Current ...................... 173 Rutherford, Magnetic Detector.......192 Sarasin and de la Rive, Discovery of Multiple Résonance______; 62 ----, Measurement of Waves in Space ............................ 74 Schloemilch, Electrolytic Detector. 189 Secondary Waves............ 94, 103, 106 Sélective Signaling..................202 Selectivity, Other Methods of Se- curing............................242 Self-Induction, Analogous to Inertia. 7 25, 206, 215 ---- Neutralized by Mutual Induc- tion ................................220 ----, Seat of, in the Ether.......... 9 Self-Restoring Coherers............. 182 “ Skin-Effect ” ...........49, 83, 145 Sky, Color of the................... 158 Slaby-Arco System....................228 ----Multiple Antenna.................144 ----Multiplier................. 195, 229 Smythe, Electrolytic Detector.......187 Spark, Function of, in Oscillator... 33 35, 128 ----, Function of, in Resonator_____ 40 ----, Influence of Light on .... 36, 176 ----, Length of............ 134, 147, 149 ----, as Means of Measurement.... 42 ----, Quality of..... 35, 134, 147, 152 Spark-Frequency, Tuning to.. . . 203, 242 Spark-Gap, Oil in.......... 37, 86, 135 Spécifie Inductive Capacity ......... 79 Stationary Waves ............... 59, 171 ----, False ......................... 63 ------ in Space ................ 72, 92 Stchegtiœf, Inductive Capacity of Alcohol........................... 82 Striæ, Interférence.................. 92 Strindberg, Researches in Multiple Résonance......................... 68 Synthesis of Light.................. 101 Syntonie Signaling ................. 204 ----, Limitations of ................237254 INDEX. PAGE. Tapper for Coherers........... 132, 181 Téléphoné for Receiving.. 183, 188, 190 192, 244 ---- Mono-.........................244 “ Tesla Coll” ...................... 148 Tesla Sélective System ............. 242 Thermal Detectors ............. 43, 186 Thin Films......................... 94 Thomson, Elihu, Oscillation Trans- former ...........................147 Thomson, J. J., on Cathode Dis- charge ............................ 177 ---- Conductivity of Electrolytes. 157 ---- on Faraday Tubes ..............166 Total Reflection ................... 99 Train Telegraphy ........... 116, 119 Transatlantic Wireless Telegraphy. 155 183, 246 Transformer, the Oscillation---148, 215 ----, Theory of .................... 215 Transmission, Effect of Sunlight on. 1<6 ---- Guiding Surface on.. 159, 162, 174 Transmitters (see also Wireless Te- legraphy) ..........................141 ----, High Power ...................151 Trouton and Klemencic on Polariza- tion............................... 98 Tubes of Induction, Faraday ........164 ---- in Leyden Jar..................210 ----, Magnetic Field from Motion of. 166 170 ----, Normal to Perfect Conductor. 173 ----, Properties of ............... 165 ----, Self-Closed ............. 165, 167 ----, “ Snapping Off ” of..... 206, 208 ----, Termination of, in Electrical Charges..................... 164, 173 Tuned Receiving Apparatus...........223 Tuning, as Means to Selectivity... 203 204 ---- of Interlinked Circuits... 149, 216 ---- to Group-Frequencies ..........242 ----, Mechanical................... 242 Turpain’s Experiments ... ........... 65 Ultra-Violet Light, Effect on Spark. 36 176 Units, Ratio of Absolute............. 13 ----, C. G. S. System ..............164 Velocity, of Light..............13, 79 ---- ----, Blondlot’s Measurement of..................... 55 ---- of Current in Wire........14, 50 ---- ---- Dépends upon Material of Wire.................. 54 ---- ----, Fizeau and Gounelle’s Measurement of........ 52 ---- ----, Kirchhoff’s Computation of..................... 50 ---- of Propagation of Inductive Effects..................... 71 ---- of Waves in Space.............. 71 ---- of Waves in Dielectrics ....... 79 PAGE. Vibrations, Modes of Propagation of. 20 See also Waves. Viscous Reaction of Conductors. 16, 83 Vortex Motion, in Ether............ 12 ----, Analogy to Faraday Tubes... 165 Vreeland, Electrolytic Detector____188 ---- Current-Multiplying Coil .....200 Waves, Electromagnetic : ----, Absorption of, by Obstacles... 132 ----, Atténuation of, with Distance. 129 161, 175 ---- ----, Anomalous ...............176 ----, Concentration of, by Mirrors. 74 87, 132, 204 ---- ----, Around a Wire .... 78, 176 -----, Detectors of. 38 et seq., 179 et seq. ----,. Diffraction of............... 96 ----, Double Refraction of..........100 ----, 'Effect of Daylight on .......176 ----, Effect of Guiding Surface on. 162 174 ----, Free, Propagation of ........163 ----, Grounded................. 156, 172 ---- ----, Character of ............176 ---- ----, Propagation of ..........172 ----, Intensity of, Greatest at Equa- tor................ 77. 103, 175 ----, Interférence of...... 59, 72, 92 ---- in Space ...................... 72 ----, Nature of ........... 76, 124, 163 ----, Plane of Polarization of.. 77, 98 ----, Polarization of .............. 97 ----, Propagation of, Along a Wire. 48 59, 78, 176 ---------in Air ............... 71, 163 ---- ----, in Dielectrics .......... 79 ---- ----, Over Conducting Surface. 172 ----, Reflection of (see Reflection). 59 72, 95, 158 ----, Refraction of ................ 98 ----, Signaling by ................ 121 ----, Total Reflection of........... 99 ----, Velocity of Propagation of. . 55 71, 79 ----, Very Short ................... 85 Waves, Hertzian (see Waves, Elec- tromagnetic). ---------, Signaling by.......... 130 ---- in Water ..................... 121 ----, Longitudinal and Transverse. 20 ----, Secondary............ 94, 103, 106 ----, Stationary, About Oscillator.. 171 ---- ----, in Space ........... 72, 92 ---- ----, in Wires ................ 59 Wave-Form of Hertzian Radia- tions ....................... 62 et seq. Wave-Length, of Hertz’s Oscillators. 37 ----, Measurement of ............ 59 ---- of Grounded Antenna....... 143 ---- of Waves in Space........... 72 Wehnelt Interrupter............ 189, 190 Wiener, Interférence Experiments.. 92INDEX. 255 Wires, Wave-Propagation Along______ 48 59, 78, 176 Wireless Telegraphy ................111 ---- by Grounded Waves............ . . 141 ---- by Hertzian Waves ............130 ----, Classification of Systems .... lil ----, Comparison of Methods ........126 ----, Conductive Method .... 112, 243 ----, Detectors ....................179 ----, Electromagnetic Method .......113 ----, Electrostatic Method..........117 ----, High Power Transmitters .... 151 ----, Limitations of ...............237 ----, Multiplex............... 223, 227 ----, Receiving Apparatus ..........179 ----, Sélective .............. 202, 242 ----, Svntonic......................204 ----, Transatlantic....... 155, 183, 246 PAGE. Wireless Telegraphy, The Commer- cial Situation ............ 245 ----, Wave Method ..................121 ----, Blondel’s Sélective Method ... 243 ----, Braun’s System ...............233 ----, de Forest’s Apparatus .. 151, 187 ----, Dolbear’s Method .............119 ----, Edison and Gilliland’s Method. 120 ----, Lodge’s Early Apparatus .... 136 ----, Lodge-Muirhead System ........235 ----, Marconi’s Early Apparatus ... 132 ----, Marconi Coherer System .... 225 ----, PopofTs Apparatus............ 138 ----, Preece’s Method ..............115 ----, Slaby-Arco System ............228 Zehnder, Expérimenta on Waves_____ 65