MAAN ANS RAR \ \ AN \ \ \ » \\ AA . A LAY RY A \ \ \ \\ \ , _— . \ ~ . \\ AY \« QU \ CA AN \ \\ ‘ RAY . MN AY AX \ x ANN . \ AY ANN A \\ A AY \ CV A \\ \ \ LRRRAS S \ \ ~~ \\ — OO \ \ \ AN A ‘ AS \ \\ \ WY S . . . \ ; \ AS A A \ \\ \ \\ NS ms \ AY ‘ \ \ AN ANN ‘ A \ AN SS \ EN AN ACA NY ANN . NN AX ~ \ \« \ \ ~ - AK A . : \\\ A \ \ AN \\\ AN ‘ \\ y Aw \ CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY Cornell University Library F 86983 C440 “Tibia 3 1924 028 884 067 olin | GAYLORD PRINTEDINU.S.A, t Photo. by Marceau, San Francisco. CHAMBLISS’ DIARY; OR, SOCIETY AS IT REALLY IS. BY WILLIAM H. CHAMBLISS. Fully Illustrated with over Fifty Copper-plate Half- Tones and Photo-Engravings. INCLUDING TWENTY-FIVE SOCIETY PICTURES BY LAURA E. FOSTER. NEW YORK: CHAMBLISS & COMPANY, PwuBLIsHERS, PULITZER BUILDING. 1895. CopyriGuT, 1894 AND 1895, BY THE AUTHOR. All rights reserved, Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1895, by Witt1am H. CHAMBLIss, in the office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington, D. C. DEDICATION. To my Mother, and all other Good Mothers : Knowing that the mutual chief object of the lives of all true mothers is, as it always was and always will be, the improvement of the human family, and believing that a concentration of attention—which is bound to come about sooner or later—on certain evils which exist among the supposed better classes in our large cities, would result in a decided improvement, I beg to dedi- cate to you these pages as a testimonial of appreciation of what the better half of enlightened mankind would like to do for society. W. H. CHAmMBLiss. New York, April 14, 1895. iii PREFACE. AccorRDING to the ablest critics, authors are witnesses. Therefore the press and the reading public must be the lawyers, the judges, and the jury. This book contains the truth. It is intended, bear in mind, for persons who possess intelligence enough to think for themselves. While mainly on the subject of society, it nevertheless touches on travel. As the book has been written at odd moments, and under a great variety of circumstances, in various parts of the world, it has received a title not inapplicable, I hope, to a record of individual experiences, candid opin- ions, and rambling observations of all classes of society. I have kept a diary for more than twelve years, during which time I served a regular apprenticeship in the United States Naval Training Squadron, made a voyage around the world, served four years as an officer in ships of the merchant marine service, and afterward spent considerable time traveling abroad, as well as in the United States, in pursuit of additional knowledge of the ways of the world. The foolish attempt of certain members of the parvenu element of San Francisco and New York to suppress the book before it was half written, by accusing me of being too personal in my remarks, and writing in a spirit of revenge, only goes to prove that the guilty sometimes x vi PREFACE. call attention to their errors by denying things of which no one has accused them. In order to show the difference between real respecta- bility and vulgar pretension in high, or alleged high, life, I have indulged in a few personal remarks, and have given some examples that will corroborate the openly expressed opinions of many honorable citizens, who declare that the alleged or self-styled high society is just the reverse of what it claims to be. I have written this for the good of society, and not with a view to injuring anyone. No person has a higher regard for real respectability than I have, and my detestation for shoddyism, snobbery, and insolence, the three principal strands in the main- stay of the alleged high society, ranks second to that of none. The compilers of dictionaries evidently never imagined that the parvenus of any American community would ever become so thoroughly un-Americanized as to neces- sitate the coining of a new word comprehensive enough to express the contempt with which the upstarts of the present day inspire all persons endowed with God’s gift to man—common sense. The word Parvenucracy (pronounce Par’-ven-d0c'-ra’- cy), used in this book, has been designed expressly for this subject. Parvenucracy means those arch-parvenus, and their followers, who imagine that the mere acquisition of a few thousand dollars, coupled with an unlimited supply of insolence and arrogance, is all that they require in order to gain admission to the homes of persons of culture and refinement. Throughout the book I have endeavored to write in language that is used in ordinary conversation. In order PREFACE. vil to make the book readable, I have refrained from the perpetration of such ‘‘ fashionable”’ absurdities as quota- tions from alien, unknown, and dead languages. I have one request to make of the reader, and that is, to bear in mind that in commenting upon the absurdities of certain individuals, whose names I have used, I have not been actuated by any personal dislike. It is entirely a matter of principle. I see no harm in using the names of impostors who hanker after notoriety of the most ridiculous kind, in order to create the impression that they are that which, Heaven knows, they are not. There is no more personal feeling in the contents of these pages than there is in the writings of the humorous reporter, who is assigned by the city editor to supply a few col- umns of legitimate news fora reliable daily paper, or in the productions of the caricaturists attached to the staffs of Puck, IVasp, and Judge. If it is wrong to point out certain corruptions; if it is sinful and irreverent to say that those corruptions are hurtful to purity and virtue; if it is wrong to criticise so-called gentlemen for ignoring their marriage vows; if it is unlawful to suggest the setting up of a social stand- ard not to be cursed with the domination of ill-gotten wealth; and last, but not least, if it is wrong to say that the negro ex-slave—the very lowest of all creation resembling man—is unfit to become the husband of the American gentleman’s daughter, the flower of our nation, then I sincerely hope that my humble opinions and truthful reminiscences may never reach the intelli- gent public. THANKS FOR ADVANCE PRESS NOTICES. Tue author begs to inform the reader that all credit for the good that may result from the publication of his Diary is due to his Friends and the Press. His friends advised him to write, and the press notified the public that the book was being written. No better proof that the leading representatives of the American press favor the stamping out of corruption, and the establishment of a higher social standard, is wanted than the fact that they assist with their able pens all authors who write for the public good; and no better example exists at the present time than the liberal, friendly aid extended to the author of this book. Since the announcement that the work was being pre- pared for publication, the gratuitous advance press notices, in various parts of the nation, have already amounted to the gigantic sum of over three hundred and ninety thousand words (390,000), besides pictures and caricatures enough to fill dozens of columns of valuable space. The San Francisco Axvamrner, the monarch of the Western dailies, for instance, has, up to date, devoted over thirty columns of news space to the assistance of the principles advocated in the book. At the rate of 1200 words to the column, allowing for pictures and dis- play head-lines, the notices of this great people’s news- paper alone amount to 36,000 words of news, besides a leading editorial of tooo words, all commending the 1x x ADVANCE PRESS NOTICES. object of the book. The New York Herald, the Chicago Tribune, the Chicago Zimes-Herali/, the St. Louis Repud- lic, and many other leading American dailies, fell in line with the Examiner, and devoted column after column to it. The New York Aera/d published in its St. Patrick’s Day edition an article of about 3500 words on the front page of the supplement. Extracts from this article were telegraphed all the way across the continent and pub- lished in many papers. TZ%e Tl’asp, the great cartoon paper of the West, published a caricature of the author in a bullet-proof coat ; and the San Francisco Ca// made sufficient mention of the work to show his recognition of the effort. The following extracts will show the spirit of the press concerning the book. The first intimation that the public received of the work was in the following notice, under the head of Sparks, by Mr. Mackay, in the San Francisco Mews Letter : “Since William H. Chambliss returned from the Orient he has been busy writing a book, which will soon be published. The most interesting features of the work will be extracts from his Diary, which he has kept since he was a boy. It will contain glimpses of life as Mr. Chambliss found it when he was enrolled in Uncle Sam's Navy, and sketches of his experiences in San Francisco society. There are few men of his age who have seen as much of the world as he has. He entered the navy when he was seventeen, and graduated in 1887, after having circumnavi- gated the globe in the schoolship Zssex. His life as an officer in the Pacific Mail Steamship Company was interesting and varied, and he has in his possession many treasures of a world’s pilgrimage.” The enterprising editor of the Zxaminer read the Mews Letter's friendly mention, and at once detailed Mr. C. M. Coe to call for some further information to give to the public. ADVANCE PRESS NOTICES. x1 After looking over the Diary, Mr. Coe picked out some extracts and published them in a two-column article, which attracted the attention of the press of the country. From the xaminer’s first criticism the following is extracted : “CHAMBLISS AS AN AUTHOR. “WRITING A BOOK ON SOCIAL LIFE. “William H. Chambliss, the young society leader, and organizer of the Monday Evening Cotillion Club, is writing a book. “The scheme of embalming his ideas in literature struck him many months ago, and with him to receive an idea is to act upon it. ‘A call was made on him yesterday, when it was found that he had transformed his Palace Hotel suite of rooms into a veritable literary den. “Tn his writings, he has not stinted himself in expression. He writes frankly and tells not only what he knows, but also what he thinks. Chaméliss’ Drary contains a mine of information of a kind not readily to be had.” FOLLOWING ARE EXTRACTS FROM PAPERS TAKEN UP AT RANDOM. “Mr. Chambliss, a prominent society man of San Francisco, is writing a book descriptive of society as it really is, and Miss Laura E. Foster, a popular society lady, is illusirating it. The selection of Miss Foster for such a task is a decided compliment to her ability as an artist.”-—Alameda Datly Argus. se “The forthcoming work on society, by W. H. Chambliss, will fill a long felt want.’—Sacramento Bee. * kok “The literary style of the book is peculiarly his own, and there is little doubt that he will create a sensation in society. In fact, it xil ADVANCE PRESS NOTICES. is doubtful if anyone but Mr. Chambliss could have written it.”"— Chicago Trues-Herald, a “Tt is a protest against what the author calls the ‘ Parvenucracy,’ which he asserts has society by the throat. “The word is a new one, and describes a condition of wealth, arrogance, ignorance, bad manners, and immorality which the author says exists in parvenu society. “He declares that the antics of the Parvenucracy, and the ridiculous make-up of their so-called society, place San Francisco in a bad light with the rest of the country. “In New York, says Mr. Chambliss, you have the rich vulgarian whose wealth is due to brains, and whose sons stand a chance of inheriting brains, but in San Francisco we have the arch-parvenu, a complete mutton-head, who simply stumbled across a lot of money. “The author is a Southerner, and he says this leveling of social requirement is degrading, and that a higher social standard should be set up.”—ew York Herald. 1K oO “Judging from the extended notices given Mr. Chambliss by the New York and Chicago papers, his book will create a social sensation.”--Port Gzbson Ulléss.) Reverlle. “The author of Soczety as zt Really Ts, is far from being a happy man. First he was worried to distraction by ambitious people who wanted to receive mention in the book; and now several persons, whose antics he has commented upon, threaten to quarter him if he mentions them. TI would advise Mr. Chambliss to equip himself at once with one of Herr Dowe’s bullet-proof coats. ’"— The IVasp. kK Took ‘Apropos of art, Miss Laura E. Foster of Alameda is illustrat- ing Mr. Chambliss’ society book, which one hears so much about nowadays. ADVANCE PRESS NOTICES. xiii “Miss Foster is very clever with her pen and ink. She won the prize offered by the Lxvamzner for the best design for a lady’s bicycle suit.”—Paczfe Town Talk, “No subject has created more interest and speculation in society circles during the past few months than the book to be entitled Chamblzss’ Diary, or, Soctety as tt Really Is. “In the dedication the author gives the keynote to the contents of the forthcoming book. It is dedicated to his mother, and declares that, as the chief object of the lives of all true mothers is the improvement of society, concentration of attention on existing evils must result in a general improvement in mankind. The style of the work is straightforward, and no one can doubt the author's sincerity. ‘Though caustic and fearless in holding up the absurdities and . pretensions of the new-rich as a warning to others, he has never- theless a dignified purpose and a certain kindliness of treatment which can offend only those whose errors he speaks of.’’-—Saz Lrrancisco News Letter. she OR “A recent announcement that a book would appear entitled Chambliss’ Diary has caused more interest, and awakened more curiosity in the public mind, especially among sociely people, than any work for a number of years, “The author is well known as atypical representative of honored heredity. His life and career have given him favorable opportuni- ties to see society life as it really is, and the ‘ Diary’ is a truthful narrative of the customs and usages of the best society, and a scathing review of shoddyism, vulgarity, and truckling sycophancy, abundant in the socalled society of parvenus.”--/ared Hoag’s California and her Buzdlders. By xe “ The object of the book is to show the difference between the better elements of society and the pretenders who claim social supremacy on account of wealth alone.”—Chicago Tribune. XIV ADVANCE PRESS NOTICES. “ Chambliss Diary will be the most successful book ever issued on society. There is a profound conviction all around that the author is a man who has had the opportunity of studying the human nature he is portraying on paper. He has traveled extensively all over the world, always moving in the best circles of society. He comes from one of the oldest families in Mississippi.” —Aless Jesste Robertson's San Francisco Soctety. FUTILE ATTEMPT AT SUPPRESSION. The high-handed attempt of several members of the Crocker-Huntington-S. P. R. R. faction to suppress the publication of the work has been told in the columns of the press. Mention of same will be found on pages 358 to 363. The San Francisco Zxaminer, in commenting upon the absurdity of trying to suppress the truth, made the fol- lowing remarks in a leading editorial : “That there should be a considerable dissension from the publi- cation of A/r. Chambliss’ Deary, wherein he has unfolded his secrets concerning the personnel of society, is natural; that the dissenters should be persons of prominence in that ‘sacred’ circle no less so. Whether the author has or has not portrayed ‘Society as it really is’ would seem to be a matter of minor importance in determining the cause of dissension. Of greater weight is the fact that he has portrayed it as it has pleased him to do. From Mr. Chambliss’ tastes in pleasure neither social dis- tinction, nor obscure origin, nor financial worth is adequate pro- tection. Even great military prowess is insufficient to silence him.” CHAMBLISS’ DIARY; OR, SOCIETY AS IT REALLY IS. CHAPTER I. THE word Society, as it is generally used in conversa- tion and writing, by all civilized persons in the United States, is supposed to mean the better or more refined portion of any law-respecting community ; well-bred persons of culture and enlightenment, to whom the masses may look for the very best examples in everything that pertains to social usages; citizens whose actions are above reproach; ladies and gentlemen who, by their pure instincts and good influences, direct and facilitate the advancement of respectability. When we speak of the state of society, we do not mean the condition of any organization or ‘‘set,”’ the members of which may claim distinction above all other ‘‘sets” or organizations in a community ; we do not mean the high municipal officers, for mere incumbency is no guarantee of either veracity or integrity, or even common decency, nowadays ; and wecertainly do not mean the rich people of a community, for it is not necessary for a person to possess vast wealth in order to be a good citizen ; we simply mean the general state of civilization. All persons of intelligence should understand that the 2 CHAMBLISS’ DIARY; OR, present state of civilization is due to the labors of those who brought it about ; therefore, the word society is not applicable to persons of leisure, who do nothing at all except boast that they never work, simply because they have enough to live on without doing anything that re- sembles work, or as they themselves express it: ‘‘We don’t work because we don’t have to.” That is just it exactly ; they prefer to live their use- less lives in idleness, and squander what was earned, honestly, perhaps, in some instances, by those who are no longer numbered among the living. When a man boasts that he is a ‘‘ gentleman of leisure,” it is perfectly safe to consider him a fool, an impostor, an upstart, or anything except a gentleman. Among creatures of this class, refinement, culture, politeness, proper behavior, and in fact, all things that tend to elevate mankind, are held in about as much esteem as honor among the politicians of the present time. With those who claim to be members of the “leisure class,” the definition of society seems to have undergone a complete change. According to their edicts, no one who is thoroughly upright and honorable in all things can possibly be a good citizen. To tell the truth about any- thing is high treason. I wish it distinctly understood that in speaking of this useless ‘‘leisure class,’ I do not mean all persons who are rich enough to live without work, nor do J mean those who, having earned fortunes honestly, see fit, in the afternoon of their lives, to retire from active business cares and take some enjoyment out of the profits of their labors. Far from it, for it would be extremely absurd for me to give the reader any such impression of my personal knowledge of mankind, which has been derived SOCIETY AS IT REALLY JS. 3 entirely from experience and associations. There are many retired business men, and retired officers of the army and navy, in this country, whom I consider gentle- men in every sense of the modern definition of the word. In speaking of a gentleman’s social qualifications, his financial standing should never be mentioned as a requisite factor, for if he zs a gentleman, he will be one at all times and under all circumstances, adverse or other- wise, and the combined malice of all his enemies, and the malignant growling, the ludicrous barking, and the pitiful whinings of all the jealous rivals, two-faced acquaintances, and fair-weather friends in creation can never change his real nature, any more than such petty annoyances have changed the individual opinions of the man we now, for the second term, honor as the acknowledged highest official gentleman of the nation: Grover Cleveland. It is customary at state dinners and banquets to pro- pose the health of the chief magistrate of the host’s country first. We Americans are noted for showing less respect to our Chief Executive than any other civilized people. Supposing now that the reader has read and digested the prefatory remarks and the dedication, let us continue our dissection of the social system by proposing the health of the President upon whose shoulders all disappointed mercenary office-seekers and malcontented anarchists, irrespective of party, political hypocrisy, or previous occupation, have endeavored to saddle a// the blame for the treachery and imbecility of the up-to-date Judases and would-be builders of a Tower of Babel, known, be it written to the sorrow and shame of society at iarge, as the Fifty-third Congress. History tells us that a large majority of our great men 4 CHAMBLISS’ DIARY; OR, were born poor. Several Presidents of the United States were born in very modest circumstances. Our Saviour, for that matter, was born ina stable. Therefore a per- son who professes Christianity should never condemn a good man on account of his having been born poor, or because he works for his living. The Revolutionary War left our forefathers, who fought for the independence of America, in very strait- ened circumstances. In those days men were not judged by the size of their bank accounts. Parvenus and “gentlemen of leisure’? were unknown quantities for many years. Our ancestors found, after seven years of hard fighting, that they had independence and nothing else, except what they were able to produce by cultivating the soil and engaging in legitimate trade and business pursuits. They were equal to the occasion, however, and civilization made rapid progress under the new form of government ; and by general consent it was agreed that there should never be any more aristocracy in America. As long as this principle was maintained, our country was the acknowledged paradise of the world. It soon became known in all the countries of Europe that the American form of government allowed equal rights to all civilized races ; and then the tide of immigra- tion to this country set in. The newcomers met with receptions that they had never dreamed of in their native countries. They were welcomed upon their arrival, and extended all of the privileges enjoyed by those who had fought to free the country from the foreign yoke. At first, immigration was a good thing for the country. Many good people, sick and tired of the oppression of monarchs and aristocrats, came over and proved to be valuable citizens. But too much of a good thing of this kind is worse than not enough. Out of this foreign PRESIDENT CLEVELAND, The Highest Officiai Gentleman, in the uniform of Com- mander-in-Chief of the Army and Navy. By permission of The lilustrated American. SOCIETY AS IT REALLY TJS. 7 immigration there sprang up an evil which has grown to such alarming proportions that, at the present time, our very form of government is threatened with disruption. Glad of an opportunity to get rid of their paupers, France, Germany, Italy, Portugal, Great Britain, Russia, Spain, Norway, and Sweden threw open the flood-gates of their sewers, and shipped us thousands and hundreds of thousands of the very lowest and most undesirable ele- ments of civilization. Those unfortunate creatures, who never enjoyed in their own countries the privileges that stray felines and canines are allowed over here, are the very devils, in human form, who defy law and order, and threaten the destruction of the government that fosters them. Bad as the hated Chinese are, any true thinking person, who knows what he is talking about, will tell you that the European paupers who are pouring into New York, and spreading westward as fast as they can be counted by the corrupt officials, are worse than the Chinese a hundred times over. The Chinese laborer never interferes with our politics, nor undertakes to defy our laws, as the European beggar does. The Chinaman gives full value in labor for every cent that he gets from his employer, and he does his work without a murmur; while the European pauper, suddenly elevated to a three dollar a day job, is always ready to go on a strike and ruin his employer without a moment’s notice. Almost every day of the year that the weather permits, you can see the curbstone orators all over San Francisco shouting at the tops of their steam-beer-toned voices that ‘‘the Chinese must go!” but you never hear anyone of those vagabonds say anything about the European out- laws, or the ‘‘emancipated” African savages who are murdering the officers and soldiers of our government, 3 CHAMBLISS’ DIARY; OR, wrecking our railroad trains, robbing our citizens, assault- ing and butchering American ladies and_ children, and pillaging and burning our homes. Oh, no! the demon who commits the crime is “‘ only fighting for his rights.” “He’s all right,” shouts the malodorous, anarchistic agitators and curbstone orators. ‘Let him go right ahead and rob, murder, burn, steal, wreck trains, stop the United States mails, ransack private homes, butcher defenseless ladies ’’—anything at all that his villainous imagination may suggest. Everything goes just so long as he will vote for a jingo for president, or an O’ Donnell for mayor.* And heis winked at by General Dimond and ex- Admiral Meade, and treated to steam beer by other “soldiers” of the national ‘‘ guard” of patriotic pension pickers. But ‘the Chinese,” who never commit any such depredations, ‘‘must go.” Those very open-air politicians, who are obliged to do their fuming and raving in wagons and on street corners for the reason that the proprietors of public halls refuse them admission, are worse than the Chinese ‘‘high- binders ” ever dared to be. Now, I am not advocating the Chinese, by any means. I never did like a Chinaman. Personally, I dislike him very much, but I prefer him to the anarchist and the African at all times. This is merely an expression of candid opinion on the absurdity of allowing those anarchistic old beer-soaked vagrants of the Dennis Kearney, Dr. O’Donnell, Eugene Debs class of society, calling themselves orators, to obstruct the public streets to tell their illiterate followers that a man who never interferes with anybody’s business must be killed or sent away, while the worst murderers, cut-throats, train- wreckers, robbers, anarchists. bomb-throwers, thieves, * T mean Dr. C. C. O’Donnell of Chinatown, S. F. SOCIETY AS IT REALLY IS. 9 and other outlaws that ever went unhanged, are allowed to commit the most atrocious crimes, and go along unmo- lested. No politician or office-seeker seems to have the moral courage to say, ‘‘ The anarchists and Africans must go!” Through fear of losing a few votes, the politicians do not even venture to say that the anarchists must stop coming over from Europe. When an anarchist is brought into court and tried for murder or arson, he generally goes free. The reason of this is because there are enough of them in the country to clog the wheels of the machinery of justice, which are oiled and regulated to protect all manner of fraud, and turn only in the direction indicated by organized political capital. The up-to-date politician is the friend of the anarchist ; he cares nothing about his colcr or odor—he needs his vote. The very vilest anarchists that ever lived are pouring into New York by the shipload, all the time, and yet no politi- cian seems to make the slightest objection to their coming. A Chinese exclusion act we already have. What we are sadly in need of now is an European exclusion act that will shut out foreign immigration of all classes. Not that I am opposed to foreigners on general principles; not that I am prejudiced against the deter elements of European society, for no one appreciates more than I the indisputable fact that reaZ ladies and gentlemen are desirable citizens, whether they are of Italian, Spanish, French, English, Irish, German, Dutch, or any other civilized nationality; but we have all that we can take care of now, and it is time to announce through Congress that the invitation list is closed. Herein lies a brilliant opportunity for some real American statesman. The man who frames and engineers this bill through Congress will go down to history, and will be esteemed 10 CHAMBLISS’ DIARY ,; OR, by all true Americans as the greatest man of the day. The necessity of a general exclusion act is so great and so plain to every good citizen, that, if one is not framed soon, we will be forced into the belief that every mem- ber of Congress, capable of framing such a bill, is bought up by the gigantic steamship and railroad companies, and other corporations of Europe and the East, that contract for and bring those immigrants over. As a true born citizen, I move that our gates be locked against this foreign invasion, called immigration, and that the natural- ization law be repealedatonce. Iam nota politician, but I should lke to know if there is one politician or office-seeker in the country who is not afraid to second this motion. An act authorizing the deportation of a few millions of anarchists and savages, irrespective of color or nation- ality, would be hailed with delight. If those demons could be returned to their native countries and exchanged for law-abiding persons, Con- gress would be justified in appropriating a sum sufficient to defray all expenses necessary for transportation both ways. And we could well afford to let English ships do the transporting. The general exclusion act should contain an article specially designed for the unconditional exclusion of penniless princes, lords, barons, counts, and all other cheap-titled adventurers who, like Prince Andre Ponia- towski and Count de Castellane, are likely to be sent over here in the future, by the same board of matri- monial brokers that sent these two sweet-scented “noblemen” (?), to marry rich parvenuesses on percent- age. Such adventurers are representatives of the better elements of foreign society about as much, in reality, as are the notorious members of the Parvenucracy who purchase them—and pay their gambling debts and mis- «OES INOY 9Y} O} PlOs pure [jw yse] puv pig} ‘puoses ‘ys ,, 29134 Ajdue Aw puv jes Aur ‘yjosXur 10y posoyo | we yonw Moz ,, ‘HATVS NOILONV ALHIOOS SIMSMOLVINOd FONIUd SSH TINNGAd SOCIETY AS IT REALLY JS. 13 tress hire—representatives of true American society ; namely, in their feeble minds. A special clause should be worded so as to render it utterly impossible for those soulless daughters, adopted daughters, sisters-in-law, or nieces, as the case may be, of our Parvenu- cracy,who“marry’ titled paupers with yellow striped crests, to ever return to America under any pretext whatever. Those marble-hearted specimens of femininity who trade their very souls and bodies, as well as their ill- gotten gold, for ignoble empty titles, are worse, morally and intellectually, and really do more harm to society at large, than even the unfortunate Chinese and Japanese dancing girls who are imported to this country and sold to the Oriental merchants, who, as soon as they tire of them, again dispose of them to the keepers of houses of shame similar to the house kept by Maud Nelson, the daughter-in-law of the millionaire ex-senator, James G. Fair of Nevada and California. Not one of Mr. Fair’s daughters has succeeded in marrying a prince as yet, but the up-to-date ‘‘ Magdalen” that his son Charlie married has a past record that, from a moral point of view, would compare favorably, as far as the income from her peculiar business permitted her to go, with that of any prince who has lived since the days of Charles II.; not excepting even Prince Hatzfeldt, who married the ‘‘adopted”(?) daughter of the C. P. R.R. octopus, surnamed Huntington; Prince Colonna, who married the daughter of Bonanza Mackay’s ‘‘wife”’ ; or Prince Poniatowski, whom William H. Crocker, the “king” of Snob Hill, is said to have purchased for a Fourth of July present for his ‘‘true American ” sister-in- law, Miss Beth Sperry, soon after old man Carpentier, of Oakland, refused to buy it for his little niece, Miss Maude Burke, before the latter became Lady Bache-Cunard. CHAPTER II. From the San Francisco Examiner I copy the follow- ing article: ““So frequent has the exchange of American dollars for European titles become that the public hardly realizes what it means. The papers chronicle the engagement between the daughter of an American multi-millionaire and the scion of some impoverished, but long-pedigreed, noble house across the water. Pictures of both the young people appear in the larger papers throughout the country, in which pictures the beauty of the girl is gener- ally in vivid contrast with the insignificant appearance of the man. “Then follow columns upon columns concerning the trousseau and wedding preparations; finally a brilliant account of the marriage, and generally a year later divorce proceedings or something of that sort. ‘©The American public has almost ceased even to make fun of this remarkable barter of American girls. The average citizen is only mildly interested, and if he thinks about it at all dismisses it from his mind with the com- forting belief that for every millionaire’s daughter who carries her father’s hard-earned dollars across the ocean to be expended in paying gambling debts or refurnishing wornout estates, there are a half hundred left. People consider the supply inexhaustible, but a careful investiga- tion of the facts shows a state of affairs that is perfectly astounding. ‘A complete list of allthe marriages of American women 14 SOCIETY AS IT REALLY IS. 15 to titled men, for the past thirty-five years, shows that at least TWO HUNDRED MILLION DOLLARS have gone away from this country in that period. ‘¢ What is even more alarming is the fact that eighty per cent. of this huge sum represents the marriages of the past six years only. This shows how the foolish fashion is growing. California has had more than her share of the burden to bear. Seven California girls have taken away from this State alone nearly twenty millions of dol- lars, or ten per cent. of the entire amount, in exchange for seven titles, most of which are both shabby and shop-worn. ‘¢ Prince Colonna has probably cost, up to date, in the neighborhood of five million dollars; Prince Hatzfeldt, an equal, if not a larger, sum. Prince Poniatowski came cheaper; a quarter of a million was about his price. Viscount Deerhurst and Lord Hesketh cost in the neigh- borhood of two and five million dollars respectively. The dot of Lord Wolseley’s California bride was probably something under a million, but with moderate luck Sir Bache-Cunard will get some two millions of old man Car- pentier’s accumulation of dollars, as his bride, Miss Burke, is the Oakland capitalist’s favorite niece, and should come in for a large slice off his estate. ‘The appended list of American girls who have married titles has been carefully verified.* It speaks for itself, and shows an expenditure of about two hundred millions for some seventy titles, most of which are out of date. ‘* Anglesley.—The Marchioness of Anglesley was Miss Mary Livingston King, daughter of J. P. King of Sandhills, Ga. She was the widow of the Hon. Henry Wadehouse of England, and was married in 1880 to Henry Paget, fourth Marquis of Anglesley. The Marchioness of Anglesley took $250,000 to England. * By the Examiner. 16 CHAMBLISS’ DIARY, OR, “‘ Agreda.—The Countess Casa de Agreda was the widow of George Lorillard, and took ¢1,000,000 abroad. ““Amadei.—The Countess Amadei was Miss Mary Lewis, daughter of T. Lewis of Connecticut. She carried $100,000 abroad with her. “ Aylmer.—Lady Aylmer was Miss Ann Reid, the daugh- ter of T. Douglass Reid of New York, and the divorced wife of George Steele of Chicago. In 1883 she was mar- ried to Sir Anthony Percy Fitzgerald Aylmer of Dono deo Castle, Kildare, from whom she was divorced in 1886. Lady Aylmer took to England a quarter of a million. ‘¢Bache-Cunard.—Lady Bache-Cunard was Miss Maud Burke of Oakland, Cal.,* a niece of Horace Carpentier. She was married in 1895, and her do¢ may reach $2,000,000 upon her uncle’s death. Her marriage settlement was probably a large one. ‘‘Brancaccio.—Princess Salvatore Brancaccio, wife of an Italian prince of the House of Savoy, was Miss Eliza- beth Field of New York. She married twenty-five years ago and carried a fortune of $1,000,000 to her Italian home. ‘‘Blackwood.—Lady Terence Blackwood was Miss Flora Davis, daughter of John H. Davis of New York. She was married in 1893 to Lord Terence John Temple Blackwood, second son of the Earl of Dufferin and Ava, the British Ambassador to Paris. Fortune of $200,000. “« Butler.—Lady Arthur Butler was Miss Ellen Stager of Chicago, daughter of the late General Anson Stager, United States Army. She was married in 1887 to Lord James Arthur Wellington Faley Butler, second son of the second Marquis of Ormonde. Lady Butler carried $1,000,000 to England. * She was engaged to penniless Prince Poniatowski in 1894, but that mercenary wretch jilted her because her uncle refused to ‘“ put up” ready cash, SOCIETY AS IT REALLY TS. 17 ‘“*Castellane.—Countess de Castellane was Miss Anna Gould, daughter of Jay Gould. In March, 1895, she was married to Count Jean Paul Boniface de Castellane. Countess de Castellane carried the greatest fortune which has ever gone abroad with a bride. Her inheritance, most of which will be spent in France, amounted to $15,000,000. “*Churchill.—Lady Randolph Churchill was Miss Jennie Jerome, daughter of Leonard Jerome of New York. She was married in 1874 to the Rt. Hon. Lord Randolph Spencer Churchill, third son of the seventh Duke of Marlborough. Lady Randolph Churchill took $200,000 to England with her. ‘¢Colonna.—The Princess of Galatio, Colonna, and of Stigliano was Miss Eva Julia Bryant Mackay, daughter of Mr. and Mrs. John W. Mackay of New York and Lonaon.* In 1889 she married Prince Ferdinand Co- lonna. The princess took abroad with her the income of $5,000,000. ‘‘Craven.—The Countess of Craven was Miss Cornelia Martin, daughter of Mr. and Mrs. Bradley-Martin of New York. She was married in 1894 to the Earl of Craven. The Countess of Craven carried $1,000,000 to England. ““Cumming.—Lady Gordon Cumming was Miss Flor- ence Garner, daughter of William T. Garner. Lady Gordon Cumming took $1,000,000 to England. ‘¢Frankenstein.—Countess de Frankenstein was Miss Brewster, daughter of William Cullen Brewster of New York. She was married in 1894 to Count Henri de Frankenstein, now of Rome, but a Russian by birth. Her fortune amounted to $400,000. ‘¢Graham.—Lady Graham of Esk was Miss Eliza Jane * Tt is said that the Princess Colonna is not Mr, Mackay’s daughter at all; that she was Mrs. Mackay’s child by ‘‘ a former husband.” 18 CHAMBLISS’ DIARY: OR, Burn, the daughter of Charles Burn of New York. Her fortune was small. In1874 she married Sir Robert James Stuart Graham of Esk, Cumberland. ‘‘Grantley.—Lady Grantley was Miss Katherine Mc- Vicker, daughter of William Henry McVicker of New York, and divorced wife of Major Charles Grantley-Norton of the Twenty-third Fusiliers, who is the uncle of her present husband, John Richard Brunsley-Norton, Lord Grantley, whom she married in 1879. ‘“‘Grey-Edgerton.—Lady Grey-Edgerton was Miss May Cuyler of Morristown, N. J. She was married to Sir Philip Grey-Edgerton in 1892. ‘‘Hatzfeldt.—Princess Hatzfeldt was Miss Hunting- ton, daughter of Collis P. Huntington.* She carried $5,000,000 abroad. It has almost all been spent. ‘““Choiseul.—The Marquise de Choiseul was Miss Claire Coudert, daughter of Charles Coudert of New York. She was married in 1892 to the Marquis de Choiseul of Paris. The Marquise de Choiseul took to France $100,000. ‘De ca Cez.—The Duchess De ca Cez was Miss Isabella Singer, daughter of Isaac M. Singer. She carried abroad with her $2,000,000, ‘‘De Dino.—The Duchess de Dino was Miss Adele Sampson, daughter of the late Joseph Sampson of New York, and the divorced wife of Frederick Livingston Stewart. She married, as the second wife, in 1887, Maurice, Marquis de Talleyrand-Perigord, Duke de Dino. The Duchess de Dino took abroad $3,000,000, The first wife of the Duke de Dino, whose title is Marquise de *The Princess Hatzfeldt was never known as Mr. Huntington's daughter. She was supposed to have been the daughter of a man named Prentiss. She was probably ‘‘ adopted” by Huntington’s ‘* second wife,” prior to the death of Mrs. Huntington number one. THE “QUEEN” OF SNOB HILL. “‘T never read either the dailies or the weeklies, I do not know Mr. Chambliss, and take no interest in the matter they publish ; therefore society should treat all such with silence and contempt.’’—Mrs. Crocker’s Jnter- view, Examiner, March 16th, 1895. SOCIETY AS IT REALLY IS. 21 Talleyrand-Perigord, was Miss Curtis of Boston. She spends most of her time in America. “‘Devonne.—Countess Devonne was Miss Florence Audenriel of Washington. She was married in 1891 to Count de la Forrest Devonne. The countess carried $200,000 abroad. ‘¢Essex.—The Countess of Essex was Miss Adele Grant of New York. When she married the Earl of Essex, several years ago, she brought with her a fortune of $1,000,000. ‘‘Halkett.—Baroness Halkett was Miss Sarah Phelps Stokes, daughter of Anson Phelps Stokes of New York. She was married in 1891 to Baron Hugh Halkett. Baron- ess Halkett carried $1,000,000 abroad. “‘Harcourt.—Lady Vernon Harcourt was Miss Eliza- beth Motley, daughter of the Hon. J. L. Motley, the historian, and the widow of J. P. Ives. In 1876 she mar- ried the Rt. Hon. Sir William George Granville Venables Vernon Harcourt., M. P. Lady Harcourt took to Eng- land $200,000. “‘Hesketh.—Lady Fermor-Hesketh was Miss Florence Emily Sharon, daughter of the late Senator William Sharon of Nevada.* She married, in 1880, Sir Thomas George Fermor Fermor-Hesketh, and took to England $2,000,000, ‘‘Hornby.—Lady Edmund Hornby was Miss Emily Augusta Roberts, daughter of John Pratt Roberts of New York. She carried away $100,000. “‘Kaye.—Lady Lister-Kaye was Miss Natica Yznaga del Valle, daughter of Senor Antonio Yznaga del Valle of Cuba and Louisiana. She married Sir John Pepy Lister- Kaye in 1881. Her fortune was $50,000. * Senator Sharon’s contract wife (Sarah Althea Terry) is now in an insane asylum in California. Old ‘‘mammy”’ Pleasant still lives, also. 22 CHAMBLISS’ DIARY; OR, ‘“‘Kortright—Lady Charles Keith Nortright, Miss Martha Ella Richardson, daughter of the late John Richardson of Philadelphia. <¢ Lante-Monfeltrio,—The Duchess of Lante-Monfeltrio della Royere was Miss Mathilde Davis, daughter of Thomas Davis of New York. She took abroad with her $3,000,000. ‘‘Langier-Villars.—The Countess Langier-Villars was Miss Carola Livingston of New York. She was mar- ried to the count in 1893, and took abroad with her $500,000. ‘¢Linden.—Countess Eberhard von Linden was Miss Isabella Andrews, daughter of Loring Andrews. She carried $1,000,000 abroad. “« Manchester.—Duchess of Manchester was Miss Con- suelo Yznaga del Valle. She married George Victor Drogo Montague, Viscount Mandeville, 1876. Her hus- band succeeded to the title of Duke of Manchester just before his death, two years ago. Her fortune was small. ‘¢Marlborough.—The Duchess of Marlborough and Princess Mendelheim was Miss Lillian Price, daughter of Joshua Price of Troy, and widow of Louis Hammersley of New York. She was married in 1888 to George Charles Spencer Churchill, eighth Duke of Marlborough. The duchess took the income of $7,000,000 to England. “¢Mores.—The Marchioness de Mores was Miss Medora Marie Hoffman, daughter of J. Hoffman, the New York banker. In 1882 she married Antoine de Manca-Smat de Vallambrosa de Mores and Monte-Maggiore. She took abroad $5,000,000. “‘Northcote.—The Hon. Mrs. Northcote was Miss Edith Livingston Fish, daughter of Hamilton Fish of New York. She married Sir Arthur Paget. Lady Paget took $500,000 to England. SOCIETY AS IT REALLY TS, 23 «*Pappenheim. — Countess Pappenheim was Miss Wheeler of Philadelphia. She carried $1,000,000 to Europe upon her marriage with Count Pappenheim. “ Playfair.—Lady Playfair, wife of Sir Lyon Playfair, was Miss Edith Russell, daughter of 5. H. Russell of Boston. “Plunkett.—Lady Plunkett, wife of Sir Francis Richard Plunkett, was Miss May Tevis Morgan, daugh- ter of Charles W. Morgan of Philadelphia. She took $1,500,000 away. “Poniatowski.—Princess Poniatowski, wife of Prince Andre Poniatowski, was Miss Beth Sperry of California. * Her wealth was $250,000. “ Rochefoucauld.—The Duchess de la Rochefoucauld was Miss Mattie Mitchell, daughter of Senator Mitchell of Oregon. She was married to the duke in 1891 and took with her $300,000. “‘Rottenburg.—Countess von Rottenburg was Miss Marian Phelps of New York. Her fortune was small. “Selliere.—Baroness de Selliere was Miss O’Brien, daughter of the New York banker and widow of Charles A. Livermore. She was married in 1892 to Baron Ray- mond de Selliere, and carried $2,000,000 to France. “«Sierstoepff.—Countess Sierstoepff was Miss May Knowlton, daughter of Edwin F. Knowlton of Brooklyn. She was married in 1873 to Count Johannes von Francken Sierstoepff. The countess carried abroad $1,000,000. “‘Scey-Montbeliard.—Princess Scey-Montbeliard was Miss Winneretta Singer, daughter of the late Isaac M. Singer. She carried $2,000,000 abroad. “‘Vernon.—Lady Vernon, wife of Lord George William Venable Vernon, was Miss Margaret F. Lawrence, daughter of Francis Lawrence of New York. Lady Vernon took $1,000,000 to England. * It is alleged that she is of American Indian extraction. 24 CHAMBLISS’ DIARY ; OR, “Wolseley. —Lady Wolseley, wife of Sir Charles Michael Wolseley of Wolseley, Staffordshire, England, was Miss Anita Theresa Murphy,* daughter of the late Daniel Murphy of San Francisco. Lady Wolseley took $2,000, - ooo to England. ‘¢ Vriere.—Baroness de Vriere was Miss Annie Cutting, daughter of the late Heyward Cutting of New York. The baroness took abroad $1,000,000.” What right have those un-Americanized parvenucratic heiresses, some of whom are said to be uncertain as to their genealogy, to parade through this country with those unnatural alien ‘“‘husbands,” purchased with the ill-gotten gains of their supposed fathers or relatives? What right have they to come back and beg our judges, whom they formerly treated with contempt, to divorce them from the reprobates for whom they deserted their country and forfeited their birthrights? Why, the Society for the Prevention of Vice should take up all such cases. I don’t mean the ‘‘ vice preventers’’ who raided the dance halls of the M. H. de Young Midwinter Fair, and made such a sanctimonious parade of the girls whom they arrested there for indecent behavior, and then never said a blessed word about the owner of the hall and leader of that branch of the cotillion industry known as the ‘‘muscle dance,” that pious old saint and ‘‘salter” of mines—to the ecstasy of trusting English capitalists— Alexander Badlam. The man who marries a woman for her money, no matter who he is,—prince, duke, count, or any other indi- vidual, —becomes the property of the woman, the same as does the Chinese dancing-girl become the property of the * She wrote some sweet letters in connection with the scandalous Murphy will contest. SOCIETY TAS Ti REALE ALS, 25 Dupont Street or Tenderloin District opium fiend who buys her outright from the dealer in female flesh. The Chinaman who gces to the market to purchase a wife always gets more for his money than does the American heiress who goes shopping for a titled husband ; for no man, evenif heis a Chinaman, is foolish enough to pay out “Tt's acold day when I get left."—A. Badlam, owner of the muscle dance hall of the Midwinter Fatr. good money for a physical wreck, such as some that the women of the Parvenucracy have paid fabulous prices for. If those feeble-minded daughters of railroad magnates and others of the new rich Parvenucracy have a right to bring their purchased husbands over here, then the Chinese merchant who owns property enough to entitle him to a residence certificate has a right to bring his wife over, provided he can prove that he has paid for her. 26 CHAUBLISS’ DIARY; OR, Those purchased wives and husbands are personal property, and if they are to be brought to this country at all, their owners should be compelled to enter them on their baggage lists as household goods. For instance, when Miss “Beth” brings the penniless Poniatowski over, her list of articles, necessary for her comfort and pleasure on the voyage, should read about as follows : One steamer trunk, One valise. One bundle, done up in a shawl strap, containing fur robes, rain coat, pillow, etc., etc. One canary bird, in cage. One pug lap dog. One prince (in glass case). One dozen bottles of perfumery and deodorizers. In the name of common sense, will our novel-reading girls never learn that a foreign title amounts to nsthing more than the paper that it is written on? It makes me sick to hear ladies mention some of those good-for-noth- ing titled sports. It is enough to nauseate a pig to hear such specimens of broken-down humanity referred to as noblemen. If the penniless Poniatowski could only induce his new owner to dress up in good, old-time American style, —the style of her ancestors, so to speak, —I think she would make a great hit on the Boulevard, and on Fifth Avenue, or even on our own Market Street promenade, where wildness and wool and papoose baskets are fresh in the memory of men still living in San Francisco. Of course, that is all bosh about the Sperrys béing ashamed to admit that there is Indian blood in the family. It is simply absurd to accuse a man of Mr. Crocker’s caliber of trying to deny that his wife is of Indian extraction, just because he does not think that it SOGIETAV MAS ila ALE Ve ALS. 27 ” sounds nice in ‘‘society,” or perhaps, because he was fortunate enough to inherit a big slice of Southern Pacific Railroad stock, and feels that he needs a prince brother- in-law in the family to give a proper European flavor to its uncertain standing in for- eign ‘‘society,” in case he should be forced to give up his inherited fortune to help pay the Government what the man who left him the money owed in connection with Mr. Huntington and other octo- puses. And then again, Iam much inclined to the belief that the story to the effect that Mrs. Carolan thinks that Mrs. Crocker’s manrers entitle her to the leadership of that society which we hear of away up in the Black Hills, where the ladies wear feathers in their heads and pack their papooses about in little bas- kets, artistically strapped on The style of her ancestors, so to speak. their backs, has been very much exaggerated. Even ad- mit the fact that Mrs. Crocker did refuse to receive Mrs. Carolan one day when the latter called on her to say “‘Good-by,” before going East, that, after all, is only cir- cumstantial evidence that Mrs. Carolan has said unkind and cutting things about the ‘‘queen” of Nob Hill, or “Snob” Hill, as I believe some thoughtless persons call that part of our city. 28 CHAMBLISS’ DIARY, OR, I think that the stately daughter of George M. Pullman, the ex-cabinet-maker-car-builder, who reduced the wages of his employees 33% per cent. in order to be able to purchase a one hundred thousand dollar bond issued by the disciples of Henry VIII., and payable on presenta- tion to St. Peter at the Universal Bank of Heaven, is too muci of a lady to dig up the history of Mrs. Crocker’s ancestors. Besides this, she has too much pride and self-esteem, to say nothing of Aawtewr, to bother her head about such a trifling matter as getting snubbed by a lady whose ideas of politeness would admit of such a bad break as refusing to receive, when she was ‘‘not at home to callers.” Even the daughter of the man who precipi- tated a strike that paralyzed commerce, and made it necessary for the President to declare martial law in Chicago, deserves some consideration. * The State of California is indebted indirectly to Mrs. Carolan’s father for causing General W. H. Dimond to establish, beyond any question or doubt, the fact that he (Dimond) was eminently qualified to command the National Guard of California—mwhenever there was no fighting to be done. General Dimond was about as far out of place in com- mand of the militia at Sacramento during the great strike as is John H. Wise in the office of Collector of the Port at the present time. The Chinese Exclusion Act has been a law for several years, and it would be a good thing if properly enforced —by honest officers. * Mr. Pullman took $100,000 from the wages of his employés to pay for a church to be dedicated to himself. Rather than acknowledge his hypocrisy, and refund the money, he fled, and allowed Anarchist Debs and his lawless strikers to destroy millions of dollars of other people’s property. GENERAL W. H. DIMOND, The Modern Bombastes Furtoso, N. G. of Cal., who allowed the State Troops to drink beer with the enemies of law and order at Sacramento. July, 1893. SOCIETY AS IT REALLY TS. 3r Under this act no Chinese can come into the country without a certificate showing him to be a resident and a pfoperty-owner returning froma visit to China—except those who can raise ready cash enough to pay their way in through our courts of justice—beg pardon—corruption. I happen to know positively that the repeated assertions of our daily papers, the Lxaminer, Call, Report, and Bulletin, that a great many Chinese come into San Fran- cisco on bogus certificates, are only too true. 1 occu- pied a position in the Pacific Mail Steamship Company that enables me to verify not only the statements that Chinese by the hundreds have been admitted on payment of certain fees to our corrupt officials, but also, that tons upon tons of contraband goods, such as opium and silk, have been smuggled in by certain dishonest officials of the United States Customs service and their colleagues in knavery. Idon’t mean the hard-working inspectors who get three dollars per day for searching the baggage of pas- sengers, and watching, day and night, the officers of ocean steamers in port, and occasionally, for the sake of appearances, arresting some poor quartermaster or engineer for trying to bring a silk handkerchief ashore for some lady friend : I mean such persons as ex-Deputy Col- lector of Port John T. Fogarty, and his partner Whaley, and such well known local ‘‘business men” as arch- smuggler Bernard Reiss, of Newberger, Reiss & Co. Iwas connected with the Pacific Mail service, and Spreckel’s line, from 1887 to 1891, and made a great many voyages to Japan and China, Panama, Mexico, Central America, Australia, Honolulu, and other foreign places. Apropos of bogus Chinese ‘‘ certificates of previous resi- dence,’ I have seen with my own eyes numbers of them. Chinese passengers en route to San Francisco have come 32 CHAMBLISS’ DIARY; OR, to me during voyages and asked me to give them a descrip- tion of the signers of their return certificates which they had purchased in China. Many of those papers were signed by Mr. Fred Davis, ‘‘ the Chinatown detective” of the Palace Hotel, and formerly bodyguard to the late Senator Sharon, of divorce court ‘‘ fame.” If the following certificates are not sufficient proof that I know what I am talking about, I will, after reproducing these papers, give a few extracts from my private diary, which I have kept for the past twelve years, during which time I booked thousands of full names in connection with many cold, stubborn facts, which I shall not hesitate to lay before an honest law-abiding public. These certif- cates will show that the positions that I held undoubtedly brought me into contact with various classes of society during the performance of my regular duties. Therefore I present them just as they are: Acency Paciric MAIL SrEAMSHIP CoMPANY. ALEXANDER CENTER, Gen’l Agent, SAN FRANcIsco, March 16, 1892. To whom this may concern . This is to certify that Mr. W.H. Chambliss entered this company’s service as quartermaster of the Steamship City of New York, November g, 1887, and that on November 15, 1889, he was appointed third officer of the Steamship City of New York, and served in that capacity until October 29, 1890, when he was transferred to the Steamship Czy of Pe- hing, and served as third officer of that vessel until October 21, 1Sq1, when he went East on a leave of absence, since which date he has not returned to duty on account of his health.* Mr. Chambliss, during his term of service in the Company, has always performed his duties with entire satisfaction to the Company in every way. (Signed) ALEXANDER CENTER, * There was nothing wrong with my bodily health ; but I did not care to endanger the health of my reputation by remaining in the Pacific Mail Company after it fell into the hands of C. P. Huntington. SOCIETY AS IT REALLY TS. 33 Pacific Mai STEAMSHIP COMPANY. S. S. ‘ Crry oF PEKING.” SAN FRAnNcIsco, June 7, 1894. To whom it may concern . This is to certify that Mr. W. H. Chambliss has served as an officer of the Pacific Mail Steamship Company, as follows : He entered the service as quartermaster of the Steamship City of New York (3,019.56 tons), November 9, 1887, and was promoted to the position of third officer of the same vessel November 15, 1889, and served in that capacity until October 29, 1890, when he was transferred to the Steamship City of Peking (the largest ship in the fleet, 5,019.62 tons), and served as third officer of that vessel until he went East on a leave of absence, since which time he has not returned to duty on account of his preferring to remain East, rather than continue in the service on the Pacific. Mr. Chambliss, during his term of service as an officer of this Company, has given entire satisfaction. Rost, R, SEARLE, Senior Captain P. M. S. S. Co.* Commanding S. S. City of Peking. * Captains Searle, Cavarly, Seabury, Clark, Ward, Mortensen, Smith, Friele, Dow, Taylor, Johnston, Russell, Pitts, Passmore, and others whom I have met, were in the Pacific Mail Service many years before Hunting- ton ever had anything to do with the institution. When Mr. Huntington took charge, as president, he showed his appreciation of the long and faithful services of the old officers by reducing their salaries from $3000 a year to $2400, And then, as if to add parvenu insult to robber baron injury, Mr. Huntington placed ‘* Lieutenant” Schwerin in the position of ‘t manager,” over the heads of Messrs. Center, Rice, Wiggins, Green, Avery, Armstrong, and other practical men who had /orgotfen more about managing the company than little '‘ Lieutenant” (?) Schwerin ever knew, CHAPTER III. I LANDED in San Francisco in November, 1887. Prior to the morning of my arrival the idea of coming here to stay had never entered my head. I had read a great deal about California, and had heard many interesting stories from men who had been here. Wonderful tales were told of the ease with which large fortunes were accumulated during the excitement of the mad rush for the gold regions, and later on in the fifties. I had met several gentlemen in New York, Philadelphia, and New Orleans, who had come out to California in ’49, made fortunes in the mines, and then returned to their old homes in the East and South, ‘‘to enjoy the fruits of their labors.” So enthusiastic were those gentlemen in sounding the praises of the ‘glorious climate of California,” that a person would feel tempted, at first, to ask them why they ever left such adelightful country. Anattentive listener to their stories generally could draw his own conclusions without asking any questions. They pointed out. the vast resources of the State, and spoke of the opportunities that single men, who would do as they had done, would find here to make money enough in a few years with which to return to ‘‘ The States’ and settle down. One thing, however, that impressed itself upon my youthful mind as being rather extraordinary, was the fact that those men who had made cheir fortunes in 34 SOCIETY AS IT REALLY JS. 35 California, and invariably referred to the State in such flattering terms of praise, had not one good word for San Francisco’s alleged high society. They never thought of advising a young man to come to San Francisco to live; but, on the contrary, their advice to men coming West was to return to the ‘‘States”’ when they were ready to get married and settle down. They declared that very few of the people who remained in San Francisco were of the class that would do to grace New York or New Orleans drawing rooms. Married men who were determined to bring their wives out here were advised to steer well clear of San Fran- cisco. They were told that any place in the State, even Sacramento and Oakland not excepted, would be better for married gentlemen who entertained hopes of raising children of their own. According to some ofthe ‘‘wise menof the East,” there seemed to be something in the climate of California that was peculiarly antagonistic to the most sacred laws for the government of domestic happiness and modern civilization. This remarkable climate was more destructive to family peace and happiness in San Francisco than in any other part of the State. But there were others, however, who stoutly maintained that the climate had nothing to do with the peculiar state of affairs in some of the alleged best families of the city, whose social pretensions could not be kept up, even in San Francisco society, except on a financial basis. The defenders of the climate declared that it was the nature of those persons to be bad, and that bad blood would be the same in any climate. And they went on in defense of the climate by mentioning the indisputable fact that they could name a great many families in San 36 CHAMBLISS’ DIARY; OR, Francisco who were just as nice and refined as any to be found in the East, or South. Those descendants of the F. F. V.’s, for instance, who moved West after the close of the Civil War, should not be classed with the arch parvenu element that ascended from Lieddsdorff Street grog shops to Nob Hill mansions at one stride. But those of the bad climate theory refused to give in; their arguments being based mainly upon the fact that some of the worst people in the city were supposed to be all right until they were found out. So there the case rested. However, this difference of learned Eastern opinion concerning the cause of San Francisco’s numerous social eruptions amounted to nothing, for, whatever the cause, the effect was a matter of fact that was universally con- ceded. The general opinion of the most liberal-minded men of the East and South, who spoke from actual experience, was that San Francisco’s alleged society was in such a state that it would require many generations to purify it so that it would be prudent for a young married couple to undertake to live here for any length of time without losing confidence in one another. They said that there were more divorces in San Francisco in a given time than in any city in the world of twice its size; some of those getting divorces never taking the precaution of having them recorded. And in addition to this, they could name many prominent men of wealth who posed as leading members of the alleged best society, and kept second establishments, and raised two families at the same time. An instance was related of a judge, surnamed Heyden- felt, who sat on the bench and dealt out justice to the “u022¢O 2279Nq —,, 28104 ETIUI Ataa nq ‘Koyory pur 1949019 JO [COP 8918 B oq 0} SUIOES OIOT I, ‘MIA 10 LNIOG ISNAQ-NOWWOD V WOWd UaUVaddV LI sy |,“MOHG SHOT], AHL NI GaAVI ,,'SIGNIG 4, ‘AEMOWT TILLY SIE] GNV YIMOOND “PM UY LVHL LIVg IHL “TTIH @ONS dO w.DNIN» AHL REMERS SOCIETY AS IT REALLY IS. 39 public for a long time. When this judge’s lawful wife died, he thought to consolidate both ‘‘families”’ under one roof, by moving his other wife and illegitimate heirs into the house with his lawful children. Of course, these latter objected to having their father’s mistress take the chair just made vacant by the death of their mother, who, Iam told, was a good-hearted woman, and endured for years this shameful treatment of her husband rather than seek a legal separation. It was then that this ‘‘judge” informed his legitimate children that if they were not satisfied with his decision they could leave the house, and appeal to a higher court. This little incident did not affect the judge’s standing in Nob Hill ‘‘ society,” for he, like several other San Francisco ‘‘ judges,” had money, and money is the god of Nob Hill. Of course, it would be extremely unjust to condemn the alleged best society of any large city on account of the actions of a few dozen of its prominent members; but older men than I am, and men who have had large experience in the world, hold to the argument that if San Francisco’s alleged high society was any part of what it ought to be, to say nothing of what it pretends to be, it would never tolerate such characters as are to be found in its membership. Judging from the fact that some persons can do almost anything and still be received into some of the wealthiest homes, and also at the gatherings of the alleged ultra “set,” any thinking person is bound to come to the con- clusion that the majority of the alleged best element is made up of very coarse material. When a man can marry his common-law stepmother, and take her into ‘‘society,” and flaunt her name in the papers asa ‘‘belle,” it is time to protest. It is bad enough for the father of grown-up sons to 40 CHAMBLISS’ DIARY; OR, keep a second establishment ; but when one of those drunken sons marries the mistress of his father’s com- mon law home, the limit of depravity seems to have been stretched beyond comprehension. While it is quite true that many of the wealthy men of the city came here without anything, not even common school education,—some of them having been born of parents who never knew what it was to live outside of the humblest sections of New York, or some of the other large cities of the East, and Europe, where people descend to the lowest depth of degradation to be found outside of China,—we would naturally suppose that, with the ac- cumulation of wealth, those persons would make some effort to show a little more appreciation of the good for- tune that circumstances, in many instances, have thrust upon them since they came here. I do not mean those who have made their way in the world by honorable deal- ings with their fellow-man ; I mean those vultures, of the dive-keeper, saloon-keeper, and gambling house-keeper element, who came here to prey upon the generosity and hospitality of the reputable classes of citizens who made California what she is to-day, in spite of the opposition of the S. P. R. R. faction of the Parvenucracy. Nobody envies those vultures in the possession of their accidentally and dishonestly acquired wealth, except, perhaps, the commonwealers and strikers, and even those, bad as they are, would hesitate about exchanging places with some of the alleged society lights, if reputations and past records had to be exchanged, and those of the latter published in the papers. Nobody wants the Parvenucracy to divide its wealth among the poor, and go back to its original occupations, and it is very ridiculous for it to think so, because all intelligent citizens know that there are too many saloon- SOCIETY AS IT REALLY TS. 4t keepers and hod-carriers and men of that ilk out of employment already, while the city is very much over- supplied with ‘‘clairvoyants” and ‘‘ massage artists” and other females of that class. It is utterly useless for such creatures to undertake to deceive the public as to what they really were before they struck the streak of good luck that enabled them to go forth and display their ignorance and arrogance tothe world. Youcan teli them as far as you can see them. But, after all, if those creatures tried very hard, they could at least master the common rules of politeness, which would give them the appearance of a better breed of swine, if nothing more. You can never expect to change a pig’s real nature, but you can, by shutting him out, prevent him from rooting up your front yard and spoiling your flower beds. The Parvenucracy makes itself very conspicuous in large crowds, at the park, at the opera, at the race track, and around the hotels and summer resorts. The height of its ambition seems to be to make indifferent people believe that it belongs to some “exclusive set.” More particularly noticeable are the members of the Parvenucracy when they manage to get into social gatherings of really well-bred, cultured, refined society. They sometimes secure invitations to nice places through the courtesy, or rather, I should say, the carelessness, of some business acquaintance who may be on the ragged edge of a polite set, or is perhaps an optimist. Then after they get in they are in perfect agony from the time they enter the house until they leave. Being conscious that they are out of their element, they feel their position keenly, and, in desperation, they put forth their best efforts to act like the rest of the assemblage. But in this they only remind you of the Anglo-maniac, 42 CHAMBLISS’ DIARY, OR, who, undertaking to impersonate the English dude, only succeeds in imitating his valet. I saw a striking instance of this kind at a little gather- ing in Yokohama, in honor of the Duke of Newcastle. The duke is a very unpretentious little man, and he isa cripple besides. One of his legs is several inches shorter than the other. His man-servant, who accompanies him everywhere, is a typical dude. A young nincompoop named Blanchard, from San Francisco, who had never seen the duke, succeeded, by some means or other, in getting in, and was standing near the door, when a naval officer greeted him with, ‘‘ How is the duke this even- ing?” The poor fellow, thinking that the officer had mistaken /zm for the duke, began to swell out like a toad, and gasp for breath. Before he recovered his voice sufficiently to enable him to reply, the officer discovered his mistake, and apologized to him by saying, ‘‘ Excuse me, old man, I thought you were the duke’s boy.” Speaking of the duke, I wonder if some of our ‘‘ society belles” remember how they followed him up and down the coast from one summer resort to another during his visit to California in the spring of 1893. Many of those “belles”? will, no doubt, remember the time that they rushed over to San Rafeal, looking their prettiest, when they heard that the duke was going there to see the Fourth of July tennis tournament. The grounds of the Hotel Rafael and the tennis court certainly presented a beautiful appearance on that occasion, for some of the prettiest girls in San Francisco were there. Those who have seen as many San Francisco girls as I have, know what that means. It was a study that Mr. Wores or Miss Foster should have immortalized on canvas, to watch the expressions on their pretty faces while Basil Wilberforce, the lawn SOCIETY AS Il REALLY TS. 43 tennis fiend, was piloting the duke around the grounds, before the doubles commenced. I felt a little sorry for some of the girls whose mothers had persuaded them to go, for it certainly looked pitiable to see so many lovely young women drawn up ina line, as it were, for a man so little favored by nature as the duke to take his pick from. When I went over to San Rafael a year later, to see the famous Hardy-Driscoll tennis contest, July 4, 1894, I noticed in the crowd quite a number of people who were there during the summer of ’93. Among those, I took particular notice of a little blond-haired woman, with a complexion that reminds you of sliced peaches and cream. She sat around the hotel and the tennis court with a languid air, and a forlorn look on her once pretty face, that would have led you to believe that she had lost her last friend. She was the very personification of unhappi- ness. I could hardly believe that she was really the same bright, high-spirited young woman who, only one short year before, went over to San Rafael with the avowed intention of capturing the duke, and, failing in that under- taking, did the next best thing, by taking charge of the champion of the day—for the day only. Inspired by curiosity, I asked a mutual acquaintance if he could tell me what ailed the unhappy little creature. This acquaintance explained that after the duke went away the poor broken-hearted girl had married the first man that she could get. ‘*Come over to the club- house,”’ said the acquaintance, ‘‘and I will show you what she married.” We walked over to the club, and there, leaning over the bar, in company with a lot of other feeble-minded nincompoopish dudes, stood the husband, a great, stupid, overgrown, flabby specimen of humanity, with a big 44 CHAMBLISS’ DIARY; OR, vulgar red face, and regular bologna-sausage and sauer- kraut cheeks, that almost rested on his disgustingly rounded shoulders. Altogether, he was a curious looking individual, and he could safely be called, what Alex Kenealy would term, a typical! mutton-head. Just what the little blonde who married this beautiful specimen of manhood should be called, I will let the reader decide. These were not by any means the only interesting persons whom I saw at San Rafael. Besides Mr. Wilberforce, who always makes people weary when he attempts to talk, and Webster Jones, who is always talking about the quantities of wine consumed at the latest parvenu dinner party,—but never mentions his father-in-law’s ‘‘ business,” or past record (?),—and Charley Hoag, who was looking around to see if there was anybody in the crowd whose name he did not have in the Blue Book ; and “Billy” Barnes, who ruined his prospects of getting the nomination of the ‘‘ Octopus” party for governor, by publishing his picture in the IFave ; and Ward McAllister, Jr., whom C. P. Hunting- ton appointed to a fat position, as Pacific Mail attorney, in order to curry favor with a certain leader of some of New York’s prominent dancing people, there were some remnants of a crowd of silly parvenus who disgusted everybody of any refinement at the Sea Beach Hotel, Santa Cruz, in June, 1893, by putting ‘‘ private parlor” signs on the reading room door. Among those remnants there was one young woman who made her ‘‘ debut,” through the newspapers, three or four years ago, and is still single in spite of the fact that her name appears in the “ society,” columns of cer- tain papers all the time. Her father uses her name in the ‘‘society”’ columns asa free advertisement for his profession. "YO MINT YJUI2S 2Yf fo Kuops2y PY) MOLL PIINPIT—'SEM IY SIUISLWE ay Se PUL SBA ay SY «ANUV SN IVUANAD» ‘SANUVE “TH “AV "RSQ ‘pps pvsog407 SOCIETY AS IT REALLY IS. 47 Occasionally her picture comes out (this costs money) accompanied with a lot of taffy about her beauty, which is, in fact, purely imaginary. Mr. Anthony E. Kaeser, a young society man from East Oakland, in speaking of the young woman’s mouth, remarked that had it been made any larger, her father, who is a ‘‘ prominent” doctor, would have been obliged to set her ears further back in order to permit of the additional enlargement. Some men have an aversion for big-mouthed women; but the young naval lieutenant, who will be away at sea a good portion of his married life, could scarcely fail to congratulate himself on that score, if he really intends to marry her at all. Apropos of the ‘‘prominent ” doctor, it is a well known fact that he has acquired nearly all of his ‘‘ prominence” through the fake society reporters whom he hires to write up the doings of his wife and daughter. The rest of his ‘‘ popularity’ he gained by endorsing the ‘‘new discoveries ” of patent-medicine men and corn doctors. CHAPTER IV. Havine already stated the fact that I came to San Francisco about seven years ago, it might, perhaps, be a good idea to let the reader know how I got here. I did not come out on one of those railroad passes especially designed for the accommodation of senators and congressmen and such other politicians as may be willing to take pay for voting against any and all propositions to compel Messrs. Huntington, Crocker, and others to pay that seventy million dollar debt that the Southern Pacific Company owes the United States. I did not beat my way out, either, but I have often won- dered whether or not the public ever stops in the middle of a political campaign to consider seriously which one of the three individuals is the worst rascal: the man with- out money or employment, commonly called the tramp, who may be in search of honest work when he steals a ride on the brake of a freight car; the smooth-tongued ‘‘gentleman”’ who is elected to office on his solemn promise to vote honestly, and then, as soon as he is elected, shows his true colors by voting in the opposite direction; or the railroad magnate, who issues passes to the dishonest office holder, as part payment, on account, for acting dishonorably with his constituents. The dishonest office holder who accepts the hospitality of railroad companies, and rides free while he is in office, is a worse thief a hundred times over than the poor tramp, because he robs the honest people who put him 48 SOCIETY AS IT REALLY ITS. 49 into office, while the tramp only steals a ride from a gigantic corporation of freebooters. Apropos of the author, Iam an American citizen. I was born in Claiborne County, Miss., on the r5th of November, 1865. Myancestors on both sides of the house were among the earliest settlers of Claiborne and Jeffer- son Counties, they having gone there, from Virginia, about the year 1790. They did not go there empty- handed, but carried with them their slaves and mules, and developed the agricultural resources of the greatest cotton State in the Union, incidentally killing off the troublesome Indians as they went along. For full particulars concerning my ancestors and rela- tives after they went to Mississippi, see the history of that State, and note the names of the Harpers, Dardens, Calhouns, Campbells, Whitneys, Comptons, Valentines, Hubbards, Hastings, Smiths, Bolles, Georges, Chaineys, Corbins, Martins, and Zollicoffers. Many of my relations reside in Virginia and the Caro- linas. The early part of my life was spent on what was left (after Grant got through) of the old cotton planta- tion, with my parents, brothers, and sister. My father, who in 1861 was classed as one of the solid financial men of the South, was fifty years old at the close of the war. Finding himself at that age with a large family, and not a dollar in the world,—his entire estate having been swept away by the fall of the Con- federacy as if by a cyclone,—he adopted that which he considered the wisest course for him to pursue during the few remaining years of his life: He became a country school teacher, and devoted his time to the instruction of the children of his friends and neighbors. He never took his own children to his school ; we had a nice little private school at home, with mother for teacher. 5° CHAMBLISS’ DIARY, OR, At the age of ten I was sent to the little country school of Mrs. Elizabeth Pattison Montgomery, near the spot where the town of Martin, Miss., now stands. My father died when I was fourteen, at which time I was still attending Mrs. Montgomery’s school. My father was buried in the private burying plot in the cedar grove in front of the old family residence of his father and mother. Of the many good things that his old friends had to say on the occasion of the funeral, I shall never forget the words of Mr. J. D. Phillip: ‘*‘The worst thing that I ever knew him to do was to swear ; and he commenced that when he heard of the election of Abraham Lincoln. He was a careful observer, and he foresaw the terrible de- struction that the ascendency of fanaticism was bound to bring to American peace and happiness.” Having a pretty good idea of my mother’s limited income, and having been brought up with the old reliable American idea that all legitimate labor is honorable, I decided to do something for myself. An opportunity presented itself in this way : In the autumn of 1881 I read an advertisement in the New York /Veekly Sun, setting forth the fact that the National Publishing Company of Philadelphia required the services of a few agents to procure subscribers for a publication entitled ‘‘ The Life of President Garfield.” I dispatched a letter to the publishers informing them that my services were at their disposal provided they would give me the agency for Claiborne County. By return mail I received a satisfactory letter, and later a prospectus of the book and a package of orders for sub- scriptions. Upon speaking to a schoolmate of my intentions I was laughed at; but that did not discourage me. Acting SOCIETY AS IT REALLY IS. 51 upon a piece of quiet advice from headquarters, I called upon the most influential gentleman in the county, Colonel James S. Mason, editor and proprietor of the Southern Reveille, Port Gibson, Miss. The result of this call was the first newspaper notice that I ever received. This notice, setting forth the fact that I was the duly appointed agent for the National Publishing Company, and that the book was a splendid work, and winding up with the editor’s ‘‘trust that the sprightly boy who will call upon you may be patronized to encourage him,” had an affect upon the citizens of my native county that opened my eyes concerning the power of the press. From that time on my success as a book agent was assured. I soon became anxious to extend my territory beyond the county lines, and with that object in view I wrote to headquarters, and received a letter telling me to ‘go right ahead wherever I could sell books fastest.” I dd ‘¢go ahead,” and what that section did not know of the life of our lamented president by the following Fourth of July was hardly worth knowing. Just how many books I would have sold I can only judge from the fact that I secured four orders from every five heads of families that I called upon. All that Ihad to do was to say that the Aever/le endorsed the book, and out would come $2.50. In the midst of my success 1 received a set-back. Having bought a small forty-one caliber pistol, I pro- ceeded to learn how to shoot, and, in so-doing, shot my- self. The ball entered my right calf, and ranging down- ward lodged near the ankle joint, where it remained— thanks to the surgical skill of Dr. John W. Barber of Port Gibson—for ten years. I had the ball extracted by 52 CHAMBLISS’ DIARY, OR, Dr. McNutt in San Francisco, in 1892, after having carried it around the world. The accidental wounding of myself upset my plans completely. It wasa long time before I could walk with- out great pain; but I was young then, and in due time the ball became encysted, and I started out again on new lines. I went to Philadelphia and became a reporter on the staff of the Zzmes, under City Editor Julius Chambers. Mr. Chambers is at present editor of the New York Recorder. While in the capacity of reporter I heard of the United States Naval Training Squadron, which at that time was offering special inducements to boys of my age who desired to ‘“‘see foreign countries and become officers.” After thinking the matter over after a fashion, I decided to abandon the position of reporter and go into the schoolships, and learn navigation and seamanship. On the Fourth of July, 1886, I found myself on board the United States ship A@cnnesota, at New York, along with about two hundred other boys. I had been in the Naval Training Squadron nearly two years then; had passed through the regular courses of training on the New Hampshire, at Newport, R. I., and on board the cruising schoolship Portsmouth, in which latter vessel I had served thirteen months, during which time a cruise had been made to Europe and return, and also a six months’ cruise to the West Indies and return. To some good, honest citizens it may seem strange that I should in this volume give detailed accounts of the doings of certain officers of the United States Navy, whose acquaintance I made during the period of three years and a quarter that I spent in the service of our country. In explanation I wish to say that the officers herein SOCIETY AS IT REALLY IS. 53 described are well known in this country; some of them having actually married San Francisco and New York society girls. Besides this, our naval officers are received into the best society the world over. They are, in fact, our nearest approach to titled aristocracy. To this latter reason, principally, is due the fact that they are always in demand in the better elements of society, as well as at the gatherings, public and private, of our coarse, vulgar, un-Americanized Parvenucracy. Therefore, I think it would be a serious mistake on my part to omit some information that I possess concerning certain officers. With a few exceptions, the officers of our navy are well. educated, well-bred, courteous men; good-hearted, whole- souled, and honorable to a degree that is truly refreshing to a person who has traveled among the Parvenucracy. I take pleasure in saying that our naval officers are gen- tlemen as a rule, and it is with a feeling of regret that I admit that there are some painful exceptions to this truly good rule. To know a man well, it is necessary to have seen him under a great variety of circumstances. What I know about these gentlemen I could never have learned at all had I not sailed on the same ships with them. Ido not wish to be misunderstood, so I will say, right here, that I consider the worst naval officers whom I shall undertake to describe several degrees higher in the social scale than the shoddyites who run after them, dine them, wine them, cart them around the city,—when they are sober enough and will condescend to go,—and offer them their daugh- ters, when there are no princes, lords, dukes, counts, or other drunken, blear-eyed, deformed, broken-down, for- eign fortune-hunting sports in the country. When any of these latter are here the naval officers are not ‘‘in it.” fam obliged to admit the deplorable fact that, particu- 54 CHAMBLISS’ DIARY; OR, larly among the younger officers, from the ensigns of the senior grade on down through the ranks of ensigns of the junior grade, and cadets on their first cruises, there are to be found a few of the sorriest specimens of the true American gentleman that I have ever seen. While Iam loath to admit that some of these young fellows seem to have never in their lives possessed one iota of the requisite instinctiveness of anything above upstarts, and that they are getting worse and worse all the time, I am thankful that my experience in the school- ships of the service enables me to point out the causes that render such a state of affairs possible. The older officers, from the admirals and commodores on down to the lieutenants, deplore the fact that the posi- tions which they have filled with such credit to them- selves and their country must in time be occupied by such dudes as now get into Annapolis. But these estimable old veterans are powerless to better the com- ing conditions. The politicians run things at Annap- olis, and those whom they send there, to suit themselves, regardless of the future welfare of the American navy, the country, or anything else, except the feathering of their own nests. First and foremost of all, the present system of officer- ing the navy is wrong. I will prove the assertion by facts: The cadets are appointed to the Annapolis Naval Academy by the congressmen from their respective districts, as the vacancies at Annapolis occur. These vacancies do not often occur, and when they get into the hands of the congressmen they come high. The con- gressmen, having had their ‘‘legs pulled” during the campaign by all the political bosses in their respective districts, have got to devise all sorts of schemes in order to exist until they are called upon by the moncpolists SOCIETY AS IT REALLY IS. 55 after election; consequently they cannot afford to appoint a cadet to Annapolis on his merits alone. The applicant whose father offers the highest bid secures the the appointment, regardless of merit, good breeding, common sense, or anything else that a gentleman should possess. The Parvenucracy, ever on the alert for such opportunities to place its sons in positions which should be occupied by sons of representative citizens only, is filling the navy with nincompoops. At Annapolis the old adage, ‘‘You must learn to obey before you can learn to command,” is rapidly becoming obsolete; therefore, it is no wonder that some of our officers are regular Anglo-maniacs. Of course the reader remembers the story of Captain Marryat’s midshipman, who, while giving orders froma book, gave the command to let go the anchor while tacking ship in mid-ocean, and then, when called to account for it by the captain, had the impu- dence to say that the wind blew the page over. We are getting lots of Midshipmen Easys in our service under the present system. The sonsof the Parvenucracy make very good book sailors, that is, in calm weather. Some years ago the politicians around Washington City set up a great howl that it was ‘‘too hard on the poor cadets to go out to sea before the masts for a few months for practice each year”; and thus they managed to get that excellent old rule practically abolished. If a cadet is too delicate to go through with the course of training that the seaman who does the fighting on a man-of-war has to go through, how is that cadet ever to become a good officer? The politicians do not seem to take this into consideration at all. But Iam devoting too much space to people who occupy only an insignificant place in the kind of society that Iam dealing with, so I will proceed with my story of the 56 CHAMBLISS’ DIARY. trip around the world on the Zssex, and tell a few of the things that I recorded in my diary about Commander Jewell, ‘‘Humpty Dumpty” Bicknell, ‘‘ Missionary ” Wadham, ‘‘Papa” Galloway, “Spunky” Walling, ‘“Count” Fechteler, ‘‘ Billy’? Poundstone, ‘‘ Boozer” Loomis, ‘‘Dude” Hoggett, Mr. Rodman, Dr. Hawke, Paymaster Smith, and others. Having entered the Naval Training Squadron at the age of eighteen, to take the regular course to enable me to become an officer in the United States Merchant Marine Service, I had signed the articles of enlistment to serve in the navy during minority. Although my course of training was practically com- plete at the time of which I speak, I still had more than a year to serve. After the boys who enter the schoolships as I did finish the course on these vessels, it is customary to place them on board regular men-of-war to serve out the remainder of their enlistments. The United States corvette Zssex was at the Brooklyn Navy Yard, fitting out for a three years’ cruise to China and Japan. Although I knew that my enlistment would expire long before the Zssex returned to the United States, I was delighted when I saw my name on the list of seventy-four who had been picked from the Training Squadron to man her for the expedition. CHAPTER V. On the second day of September, 1886, the Essex, fully equipped for the long cruise, cast off her lines from the dock at the Navy Yard, and swung out into the East River. After a good deal of backing and filling as we picked our way through the great fleet of ferryboats, steamers, tugs, and every kind of craft imaginable, we passed under the great Brooklyn Bridge, and steamed on down past Castle Garden. Passing the famous Bartholdi Statue of Liberty, on Bedloe’s Island, on our starboard hand, we went ahead full speed down the Bay and through the Narrows. As we steamed on out toward Sandy Hook, we passed the big Guion Line steamer Ne 45. TRAN 2 MI AN IN J 1 SOCIETY AS IT REALLY IS. 357 who deposit their incomes at the First National,—pre- tended to believe the flimsy and utterly false stories of the Yokohama ‘ fruit-pickers,” and corroborated their tales just to get his name into the papers, and finally denied having done so when I sent Mr. Von Lenthe to him to explain the law of libel. The following note from the young attorney, who is well known, is self explanatory : I4 SANSOME STREET, SAN FRANCISCO, June g, 1894. Mr. W. H. CHAMBLISS, PaLAcE HoTeEL, City. DEAR Sir: I have called upon Mr. Murphy, and he denies 77 toto the statement he is said tohave made to Mr. F. E, Hunt of the Chronicle. We was very nervous, however, and I am inclined to think he was telling untruths. Trusting that his denial will satisfy you, I remain, Faithfully yours, OTHO Von LENTHE, Attorney and Counselor at Law. I wish to warn the public against this Yokohama nest of gamblers. They are E. V. Thorne, ‘ Fatty” Williams, E. L. Conan, and ‘‘ Mermaid,” or Hog Davis, who keeps a gambling house up on ‘‘The Bluff.” They form a combination out there that rivals the Lawrence House carpet-baggers of Jackson, Miss., and the 905 Sutter Street ‘‘fruit-pickers” of San Francisco. A word of this kind is sufficient. Therefore, the reader will bear in mind to steer clear of these loathsome wretches. Incidentally, any American citizen who recognizes Dun and Herod outside of the Legation does so at the risk of his own reputation. In January, 1894, I returned from Japan, and in March, April, and May I made a trip through the North, East, 358 CHAMBLISS’ DIARY; OR, and South, from which latter delightful trip I returned less than a month ago. At the present time (June 22, 1894) the sky of my future prospects, which looked so dark and gloomy two years and a half ago, is brightening up. ‘he sun has ‘broken through at last, and I am getting the benefit of his light; the black clouds are disappearing and the horizon is almost clear. I can say truthfully that the future looks brighter than it ever looked before. In other words, things in general have taken a turn in my favor. I have more friends now than I ever had before, and I appreciate them as no man ever did appreciate his friends. Reading over the pages of my diary, I find many things in my own hand- writing which amuse me. Having inherited an unselfish disposition from my parents, I never.could enjoy any- thing by myself. Therefore, since the road is clear, 1 will let my friends have the benefit of my experiences, that they may profit by my losses. For many years I have been taking notes of the pecu- liarities of various classes of society. These notes I have kept in the form of a diary with dates, and names of persons and places carefully recorded. For some time past my friends in different parts of the world have been advising me to publish the Diary in book form. There isso much of it that it would be impossible to get it all into one book, so I have decided for the pre- sent to publish the part that relates to the Parvenucracy. New York, May 22, 1895: If any of my friends imagine that it is an easy thing to write, revise, edit, correct, and illustrate a book in San Francisco, they would do well to disabuse their minds of that impression before starting out in the literary line. SOCIETY AS IT REALLY TIS. 359 If anyone imagines that it is easy to get the truth published about the alleged society,—the Parvenucracy which has brought so much disgrace upon fair Cali- fornia,—he makes a big mistake. If any ambitious author imagines that he can trust to the honor and honesty of San Francisco engravers and printers whom he has paid liberally in advance for their services, I wish to inform him that he is making a fatal error, unless he has some perseverance and capital. For the enlightenment of all who may wish to know why I made the above statements I will give a brief sketch of my own experience during the past four months, in endeavoring to get this book with its illustrations before the public. After the announcement in the Mews Letter, and the subsequent publication of a few dozen columns of extracts in the Examiner, nearly every newspaper on the entire Pacific Coast, as well as in San Francisco, mentioned the fact that the book was soon to be published. The [Vasp published some spicy cartoons on the subject, and the Eastern and Southern papers took it up and informed the world that the history of parvenu society, including that of San Francisco, was about to be published in book form, and that the book would be profusely illustrated. Letters and bids from publishers, printers, artists, and engravers began to come in from all sides. Many East- ern publishers sent in their bids. Considering the fact that California is my favorite State, and that it is for the improvement of Pacific Coast society that I am publish- ing the facts, experiences, and honest opinions herein set forth, I decided to have everything in connection with the illustrating and publishing done right in California. To Miss Laura E. Foster of Alameda, the talented young artist whose name I have placed on the title page, 360 CHAMBLISS’ DIARY; OR, I gave the contract for the painting of the pictures and the drawing of the sketches. I wish to say that Miss Foster performed her work with entire satisfaction to me in every particular. To George O. Watkins, manager of the Union Photo- Engraving Co., of San Francisco, who called on me in person and solicited the work of engraving, 1 gave the contract for the making of the cuts, photo-engravings, and half-tones to print the pictures with. Mr. Watkins and the Union Photo-Engraving Com- pany proved themselves to be dishonest, dishonorable, and totally unworthy of confidence, credit, or trust. They took my pictures to their work-shop, photo- graphed them, made the cuts all ready for printing, accepted my coin in payment for same, and then refused to give me the cuts. As if this were not enough to shame the lowest thief in San Quentin, this set of ineffable knaves refused point- blank to even deliver to me my original pictures, draw- ings, and paintings, that I might take the same to an honest engraving company and have other cuts made from them. Incidentally they kept my money, and would not return that until Judge Slack of the Superior Court advised them in open court to compromise the case with my attorneys. Here is the receipt in their own handwriting, showing that they had the money as well as the pictures. SAN FRANCISCO, CAL., Sept. 24, 1894. Received from W. H. Chambliss fifty dollars ($50) on account. (Signed) Union PHOTO-ENGRAVING Co, Per SAGE, During the discussion between the knaves and myself over their refusal to give up my property, one of the knaves lost his temper and told me that the firm of H, S,. ‘UOI]LIAPISUOD v 10J S]Nd dy} Suipjoy oyur Auedwos Ss s “ SUIAVISUS JSIUOYSIP dy} Ud}YySly pur skayovy slay} yar oS Ady} “AOYNE ay} a1vds 0} Survey ,, “AAVIC .SSITANVHD NI SHUN LOId AHL SSAUAddNS OL ONIAYL GMO) YWANIOYW) AHL SOCIETY AS IT REALLY TS. 363 Crocker & Co. had threatened to withdraw its trade from the said knaves if they delivered the pictures. It appears that some of the pictures looked too much like certain vulgar snobs, ex-bootblacks, and other impostors who pose on their ‘‘gall”; and those, headed by the Crocker crowd, tried to suppress the pictures. Failing to scare the author, they went with their little lackeys and frightened the dishonest engraving company into hold- ing the cuts for a consideration. Of course I brought suit against the engraving com- pany for the return of my property, and damages enough to pay for the annoyance, additional expense, and loss of time that their dishonorable work caused me. Foresee- ing that it would be a long time before I could get my property from the Union Photo-Engraving Co., I got Miss Foster to duplicate all the original drawings, and then had part of the cuts made by the San Francisco Engraving Vo., and the rest by the //ustrated American Publishing Co., New York. These companies acted honorably with me, and took no notice of the upstarts who were trying to suppress the work. To Walter N. Brunt, a supposed reliable San Francisco printer, I had given the contract for the printing and binding. Mr. Brunt turned out to be as unreliable and cowardly as the Union Photo-Engraving Co. Having paid Mr. Brunt the full amount in advance for the printing of the first edition, I did not anticipate any breach of contract with him, until the book was almost ready to go to press. When I had succeeded in getting the cuts made by the reliable engravers mentioned above, Mr. Brunt refused to complete his contract for the print- ing, unless I would expunge all reference to the Crocker, Huntington, S. P. Railroad faction of the Parvenucracy. 364 CHAMBLISS’ DIARY, OR, Of course I refused to modify the text of the book, be- cause I felt that it was my duty to the honest citizens of California and elsewhere to give them the truth about that particular crowd. Seeing that Mr. Brunt had been bought off by the Par- venucracy, I went to several other printers, and to my surprise found that the entire printing industry of San Francisco was practically controlled by the very frauds that I am exposing. No one doubted a word that I have in the book, but all the printing firms were afraid of losing the patronage of the Parvenucracy if they printed the truth about the rottenness of its so-called society. Determined not to be outdone by the enemies of decent society, I took the train for New York in quest of an honest printing house. This book being devoted to the subject of society as it really ts, and being intended to open the eyes of all good citizens to the necessity of using great care lest they be imposed upon and injured by certain animals and fiends in human form, that I have mentioned, I, of course, could not think of asking any of my friends to share the respon- sibility of the plain English that I use. I have been threatened with personal violence by the ‘‘fruit-pickers”’ for breaking up their gambling house, but that does not disturb me a little bit. The S. P. Railroad Company and its constituency, which form the nucleus of the Parvenucracy, have threat- ened me with all kinds of punishment for declaring that they are vulgar upstarts. But that is an old game of theirs which doesn’t work with the author of this book. It is the author’s intention to write another book, later on, in which no harsh language will be used. Snobs, up- starts, vulgar pretenders, and all classes of Parvenucracy SOCIETY AS IT REALLY ITS, 365 will be treated with the silent contempt that they deserve in a publication descriptive entirely of good form. The author extends a general invitation to his friends, as well as to all others who are in favor of improving society at large, to send him a few lines nowand then on what really is good form. It is good form for any reputable citizen to call upon an author, even if he does not know him, if he wishes to impart any valuable information. That the author appreciates all verbal or written information, is shown by the confidential manner in which a few thousand letters and all previous calls of this kind have been treated. Society in any new city or community can always stand alittle improvement. We will take San Francisco, for instance. It has been asserted that there is no society there at all, and no less a personage than Mrs. Charles Webb Howard made the assertion. She never made a greater mistake in her life. Perhaps Mrs. Howard wanted to convey the idea that there is no good society in San Francisco, and probably she was correct so far as her personal knowledge and the doings of her own personal acquaintances were concerned. But they are not every- body. Mr. Greenway declared that there were only 400 persons in San Francisco who were fit to go into good society, and not one of the other 299,600 persons in the city ever took the trouble to ask him who the chosen 4oo were, for everyone knew that he meant the Huntington, Crocker, Fair, Mackay, Sharon, O’Brien, Flood, de Young cligue of S. P. Railroad Royalty, which holds that a man who has not at least one mistress is not eligible to society. Although Mr. Greenway was 4oo heads nearer to the truth than Mrs. Howard, the 400 that he had reference 366 CHAMBLISS’ DIARY; OR, to were the identical persons at whom Mrs. Howard pointed her dart. Had Mrs. Howard said what she meant, she would have been applauded, instead of laughed at, by all the other 299,600. The leading society questions of the day are: II’ho is fit Jor society 2 and Iho ts not? In a general way these questions may be answered with the true statement that all persons are fit for some kinds of society. There is a vast river between the highest and the lowest circles. This river is large enough to float every living human being who comes within the radius of any circle of society, except the extreme very lowest, viz.: thosewho have been born outside of the bonds of wedlock. Like a dead fish swept through the crevasse on the other side of the great river opposite to the high, rocky hills on which stands the child of honor, the illegitimate heir should be banished from the society of all mankind, —except the promoters of his existence,—who should be swept through the yawning gap, to remain and keep company with the result of their unnatural work, until the vultures shall have claimed their own, and relieved this beautiful world of the disgrace and the blot that has been perpetrated upon civilization. Members of other circles are not safe while the tainted promoters of the lowest order are permitted to run at large and unrebuked. Ee Anyone is liable to contract a diseasé that ’i is ‘contagious, Almost anyone is liable to be swept through the break in the “zee in company with the offender; but no one should ever be permitted to paddle over in the direction of the safe side after he has once been thrown out of the main stream with the refuse and débris for such a crime against society and decency. SOCIETY AS IT REALLY JS. 367 The male portion of mankind ts to blame for all of those stains and illegitimate blots on the face of soctety. Any man who attributes it to ‘‘woman’s weakness ”’ is a coward and a falsifier, and unworthy of notice. Man, being the stronger of the two sexes, and knowing it, is the chief cause of all the shame to which the weaker sex has ever had to submit. Take any so-called massage artist, or any other bad woman, and trace back her history, and it will be found that her downfall was caused by some unfaithful lover, drunken, brutal husband, tyran- nical father, or some unnatural old hag who was herself the result of man’s perfidy. Now, we will look into a few facts and figures and think up a plan for the improvement of the circles, between the highest and the lowest. The former is all right and the latter is beyond redemption; but the other circles are made of good material. A few remarks might do more good than the average person would ordinarily suppose. Let us take common sense as a foundation. Say that San Francisco has a total population of 300,000 persons. If we could gather together all the murderers, robbers, burglars, thieves, pickpockets, sheenies, professional gamblers, fruit-pickers, bunko-steerers, bums, tramps, toughs, hoodlums, common drunks, quacks, shysters, saloon-keepers, massage artists, fake society reporters, Chinese, Indians, niggers, mulattoes, octoroons, anarch- ists, street-corner orators, political bosses, dishonest officer-holders, ballot-box stuffers, and all other objection- able pests in the city, they would amount to about 100,000 two-legged animals resembling in outward appearances human beings. Substract this 100,000 from the total population, export 368 CHAMBLISS’ DIARY; OR, the vile mass of corruption to Hawaii, and we will have a beautiful city with a legitimate population of 200,000 respectable citizens eligible to admission into the homes of each other on a basis of comparative equality and socia- bility. Careful intelligent observations show conclusively that the same rule would be applicable to almost all cities where liquor is sold by the drink, if you base your esti- mate on a pro rata of population. Mr. J. Waldere Kirk of New York, a friend of the author, asks the following questions: ‘“‘What are your remaining 200,000 peaceable citizens going to do with the late 4oo members of the self-styled only polite society ?” Nothing at all, friend Kirk. It was found that when the water ran to its proper level the little ‘‘4o0” were absorbed in the 100,o00 who got exported. The last one found his proper sphere under the head of classified pests. ‘“¢What became of the navy and army ?” Oh, the navy is all right. As I told you before, the navy people are gentlemen as a rule. The shipping committee created a few vacancies: Captain Gridley, “Bucko” Elliott, ‘‘ Missionary”? Wadham, ‘‘ Hoofen- skoofen,” ‘‘Humpty Dumpty,” Quack-Nut Ruhm, Heatherington, Dellyhanty, ‘‘Shorty” Evins, O’Brien, Fool Rogers, Henry Hudson, and a few other ‘‘spare articles,” the loss of which is a great help to the social standing of the service. With reference to thearmy, I am afraid that the division stationed at the Presidio will have to be recruited again before it will be visible to the naked eye. The officers would mix up with the Parvenucracy of Pacific Heights and the Pacific Union Poker Club and MR. JAMES WALDERE KIRK, The King of Swell Dressers. “A real gentleman never forgets that proper behavior and courtesy always add to the appearance of faultless at- tire.” —Kirk. SOCIETY AS IT REALLY ITS. 371 the bum Bohemians, where they became thoroughly demoralized. But the navy boys had better sense. The unmistakable genuineness of the storm-beaten veterans of the maritime division of our fighting forces, when placed side by side with the pitiful conceit of the brass-bound figureheads who appealed to the public to decide which arm a colonel should carry his overcoat on when he went calling, presented such a contrast that the deporting committee took charge of everything at the Presidio except the ordnance stores. A certain Presidio officer in uniform at a respectable social gathering reminds one of a professional peacock procured to pose as a plaything for pretty little girls. And I don’t mean ‘‘ General” Graham, Lieutenant Davis, or Lieutenant Winston, either. If the story that this officer receives a good deal of attention from females is true, it can be readily accounted for by the fact that ‘‘ xew” women are not as particular about how they bestow their affections as /adies are. No one has a higher regard for female virtue than the mariners, and the reverse is true of some ‘‘soldiers,” who appear to have a penchant for the wives of sailors, especially bleached blondes who live in hotels. The mariner’s respect for woman is based on the fact that she is all that he has to look forward to upon his return to port. The soldier, whose life in times of peace and pros- perity is spent in strutting around to the music of a brass band, to be admired by little girls and guyed by small boys, for which he vents his spleen on all who are so unfortunate as to be subject to his orders, is the very worst enemy to the peace and happiness of the absent sailor. Ladies, don’t be deceived by the uniformed ‘‘ heroes ”’ 372 CHAMBLISS’ DIARY, OR, whose smell of powder has been derived from the puffs that painted females use to embellish their wrinkled complexions with. The Wounded Knee affair was an eye-opener for women who confided in those pretty birds. **How about S. G. Murphy, President of First Irishonal Bank?” asks Mr. Clark Traphagan.* Oh! he got shipped off with the first lot. You see he undertook to show that it was good form to invite a citizen to draw his money out of the ‘‘Sheeny Bank” and put it into the First Irishonal. He afterward failed to keep an agreement to notify the citizen of the arrival of a draft for one hundred dollars that was in dispute. During his spiteful efforts to discredit the citizen by mis- representing him to newspaper reporters, the banker appropriated to his own use about eight thousand dollars of Mrs. Colton’s money that was on deposit at the bank. He never was in the ‘‘ Four Hundred,” but of course the dumping committee took charge of that fellow. “‘ How about W. B. Cooke?” Well, he didn’t belong to the ‘ Four Hundred,” either, but he went with the classified fake society reporters and hangers-on, who hang around the saloons all the time. You see he held that it was good form to go to a dinner party in an intoxicated condition, and take his six foot five inch shadow, G. S. Mearns, along with him, when Mearns, who was also drunk, was not invited. The dumping gang scooped those two in along with Nose- grave, Hume, Bartlett, and a whole lot of other scav- engers of that ilk. *I met Mr, Traphagen first at Monterey, Cal., in January, 1892. In May, 1895, I had the pleasure of renewing his acquaintance, and visiting him at his home in Fordham, New York. SOCIETY AS IT REALLY IS. 373 “Thank Heaven for that!” says Mr. Traphagen. “Now tell us something about the 200,o00 remaining citizens.” Certainly, with pleasure: they are all right, and as soon as they realize that they are entirely free from the daily annoyances of the 100,000 public nuisances they will be very happy. Now we will get down to a common sense basis and speak of San Francisco’s real social system as an example that older cities might do well to follow, up to date. Supposing the 100,000 public nuisances to have been duly exported, there certainly must be among the 200,000 law- abiding citizens at least 25,000 young people who are fond of dancing. In order that all of those young ladies and gentlemen may go to parties, and dance and havea good time once in a while, there should be 100 regularly organized clubs of 250 members each. Each member of each club should know and feel that he or she is just as good as any person in any of the other 9g clubs, and not one bit better. This feeling of patriotism should be thoroughly understood by all, but at the same time, it should not be flaunted too promiscuously. There should be no jealousy or rivalry, but on the contrary, all the clubs should harmonize. It would be the easiest thing in the world for those 25,000 young persons to organize themselves into 100 clubs. There are several nice dancing clubs in San Francisco already. For examples, permit me to mention the L£ytre Nous (pronounced ahn-tray-noo) Cotillion; The Assembly Club; The Cotillion Club; The Club 400, and a new organization conducted under the cheer- ful name of ‘‘The Progressive Club.” Then there is a new club just called the ‘‘ Dancing Club,” which I hear is a nice, quiet organization. It meets at the Palace Hotel. CHAPTER XXIX. CONCERNING the personnel of San Francisco’s polite or- ganizations, the Autre Nous Cotillion is conducted on a basis which has for its chief object the mutual pleasure and improvement of its members. It is, practically speaking, an up-to-date cotillion club. That this club values its private individuality and fam- ily sociability more than it does the flattering praises of journalistic and literary admirers, is shown by the names of its members, who are of the good old reliable home- loving class which favors the advancement of real respect- ability, the foundation of polite society. The following is a list of the Ave Movs’ members : Miss Alice M. Butler, Miss Grace E. Bertz, Miss Sarah E. Boyle, Miss Clara Byington, Miss Kate L. Byington, Miss Sarah Bluxome, Miss E. E. Cudworth, Miss Mabelle Gilman, Miss Nelye J. Giusti, Miss Sadie E. Gould, Miss Charlotte Gruenhagen, Miss Albertia Gruenhagen, Miss Emilie Herzer, Miss Beatrice E. Hughes, Miss Mae Hoesch, Miss Marie Ibarra, 374 Miss Josephine E. Jourden, Miss Elena King, Miss Ala Keenan, Miss Kate Kerrigan, Mrs. Geo. F. Kincaid, Miss Cassie Lampe, Miss Jessie B. Lyon, Miss Minnie Ludlow, Miss Lotta Musto, Miss Nella McCormick, Miss Mattie McCormick, Miss Julia Nevella, Mrs. Geo. S. Nevin, Miss Edna O’Brien, Miss Nancy Place, Miss Lida Platt, *$.19]U99 [VIIOS JOUTISIP 9a1y} JO S1ayySnvp saneu Sutaoj-awoy jo sad&q aanvyuasaiday “ALAVAGI NVOINANVY LNOdV HLAUL ARL “wIUsOLIJVD “yqnos “YU JlONT SOCIETY AS IT REALLY ITS. Mrs. Frank L. Platt, Miss Maude Rice, Miss Camilla Redmond, Miss Marie Sabatie, Miss Kate L. Stanton, Mrs. M. M. Stewart, Miss Amy Teresi, THE GENTLEMEN Alexander, Wallace, Adams, George W., Anthes, Frank F., Austin, Lynn, Bigelow, J. Edward, Byington, Lewis F., Burns, Dr. John B., Bryant, Dr. E. R., Carrera, Edward G., Clement, Dr. Herbert, Desmond, John H., Frazer, Dr. T. J., Fyfe, Ormiston B., Graham, George D., Gantner, J. Oscar, Herzer, Herman H., Haight, Robert F., Hoag, O. H., Jr., Kelly, William, Kase, Thomas K., Kerrigan, Frank H., Kincaid, George F., Lawton, Dr. Wm. P., Lovey, Louis W., Lyon, Walter S., 377 Miss Goldie Tobelmann, Miss Jessie Taggart, Miss Emma Umbsen, Miss Eva Worth, Miss Aimee Woodworth, Miss Dollie Whelan, Miss Leah S. Young. MEMBERS ARE: Ludlow, James T., Lee, Eugene, Mau, Arther H., Musto, Clarence, Meussdorffer, Arthur H., Nunan, Robert G., Naylor, Arthur D., Nevin, George S., Nougues, Chas. J., Peters, Fred W., Phillips, L. Ernest, Pixley, Will L., Platt, Dr. Frank L. Parks, Fred H., Robbins, James C., Roussy, Gaston, Rigg, George A., Ross, T. Patterson, Saxe, Harry A., Spalding, Chas. W., Umbsen, Henry P., Vogel, Edward J., Woolsey, Dr. Mark H., Wise, Dave W., Whitley, Henry A, = 378 CHAMBLISS’ DIARY; OR, The directors are Mr. Sanford G. Lewald, Mr. Robert F. Haight, Mr. Charles W. Spalding, and Mr. O. B. Fyfe. To these young gentleman the club is largely in- debted for its distinction of being the best organized cotillion in California. The club which gives parties under the name of ‘‘ The N.S. L. K. 10,’ is composed of active members of the Entre Nous. The Assembly Club differs from the Entre Nous cotil- lion in that its membership is limited exclusively to the male sex. The gentlemen argue that this allows them the privilege of taking as many ladies to the dances as they can provide carriage accommodations and partners for; and it also facilitates the bringing out of débwfantes, who were quite numerous at their last two functions which I had the pleasure of attending in the winter of ’95. The Assembly Club is composed of the following gen- tlemen: EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE. Mr. D. B. Crane, Mr. E. D. Conolley, Mr. E. C. Deni- gan, Mr. C. C. Moore, Mr. H. W. Spalding. MEMBERS. Bostwick, H. R., Elliot, W. E., Briggs, A. A., Greenlee, F. S., Brown, J. A., Hecker, J. G., Castelazo, Arthur, Hoag, O. A., Jr., Christie, J. A., Hockett, E., Conolley, E. D., Lang, A., Cook, F. R., Martin, F. M., Crane, D. B., Melrose, C. K., Day, H. L., Moore, C. C., Denigan, E. C., Newman, G. H. 3 MR. CHARLES EDWARD BLAIR, Of Pennsylvania. A type of the American Gentleman in private life. SOCIETY AS IT REALLY JS. 331 Parsons, J. A., Sprague, P. T., Rigg, G. A., Stevens, J. W., Robinson, N. A., Sturdivant, B. B., Rue, H. R., Thornton, A. C., Runyon, F. W., Toepke, W. H., Schlingheyde, C. E., Watters, T. C., Spalding, H. W., Willis, Edward. The Club ‘‘ 400” was evidently christened under that name in a spirit of sarcastic humor, for there is nothing about the membership to indicate any symptoms of the pitiable, bombastic ludicrousness which is so abundant in another so-called ‘‘ four hundred” in which social stand- ing is based on the pay-as-you-enter system. The directors of the common sense Club “‘ 400” are: O. A. Harker, V. E. Matthews, J. Proctor Whitney, C. L. Mitchell, Lancelot H. Smith, E. P. Hulme, and C. E. L. Hildebrecht. The Cotillion Club, which gave the Charity Ball at the Palace Hotel in January, 1895, was organized by Dr. J. F. Twist, assisted by Mr. B. Frank Priest and Dr. H. B. Soltan. These gentlemen deserve great credit for the manner in which they work to get up cotil- lions merely to facilitate the innocent pleasure that young ladies and gentlemen find in well conducted dancing parties. Who says that such parties are not beneficial to polite society echoes sentiments which savor strongly of ignorance, jealousy, vindictiveness, or fanaticism, or all. Preachers who denounce dancing and the little inno- cent amusement that it affords are just as much in error as infidels who denounce Christianity. Those who took active parts in the arrangements of the cotillions of this club last winter were: Dr. J. F. Twist, 382 CHAMBLISS’ DIARY; OR, Mr. Eugene A. Mantell, Mr. B. Frank Priest, Dr. H. B. Soltan, Mr. W. E. Jackson, Mr. J. A. Christie, Mr. Will E. Fisher, Mr. J. T. Ludlow, Dr. R. L. Sutherland, Mr. J. C. Bateman, Mr. M. C. Bateman, Dr. G. S. Backman, Mr. C. T. Ryland, Jr., Lieutenant Frank A. Brooks, Lieutenant T. S. Phelps, Jr., Mr. E. N. Atwood, .Mr. Charles W. Spalding, Mr. J. S. Hawkins, Mr. Charles Hilton, Mr. W. T. Baggett, Dr. T. A. Rotanzi, Mr. Frank E. Webb, Mr. H. B. Holmgren, Dr. W. P. Agnews, Hon. H. E. Highton, Mr. J. Shucking. That the above mentioned gentlemen and all the rest of the club ave far above anything like petty, social jeal- ousy is shown by the fact that they extend invitations to the leading members of all the respectable cotillion clubs in the city to participate in their functions. That this newly aroused sentiment of sociability is appreciated is shown by the fact that there were more dances last winter participated in by representatives of all the different clubs—which are clubs at all—than ever before known in the city. This is the true spirit. All the nice clubs should always be on friendly terms. When honored citizens such as the president, or the great admirals or generals, visit you, give them receptions that they should remember as a credit to the social system of the city or community. One feature of the dancing party which is growing more and more conspicuous by its absence is the irre- pressible fake society reporter. The managers of cotillion parties have found it not only advisable, but necessary to the comfort and pleasure of dancers, to suppress those news scavengers, as Tom Flynn of the [asp calls them. They are not journalists at all, and it is the hope of all real journalists that the present generation will live to see the extermination of all SOCLZENGAS LT ARE AEE VATS, 383 such poor, puny, pitiable, persistent parasites as W. B. Cooke, J. O'Hara Nosegrave, Hugh Hume, Little Birdie Irving, Charlie Nosegrave, E. M. Greenway, and all of that worse than useless tribe of professional toadies. Not one of those toadies is above receiving ‘‘tips” for special mentions. There are some organizations which are rarely men- An Honest Lawyer. tioned in the ‘‘society columns”’ contributed to by the fakirs or scavenger reporters. Among those may be mentioned the Western Addition Literary Club; the Native Sons of Vermont, and the various parlors of the Native Sons and Daughters of the Golden West. Nearly all of those organizations give monthly dances or enter- tainments of some kind; often for charitable purposes, but never to assist in the facilitation of society column snobbery. They leave that to the non-producing ele- ment—the Parvenucracy. Then there are several little dancing clubs conducted on the fifty cent admission or “hat check” basis, and 384 CHAMBLISS’ DIARY; OR, devoted to the interests of good citizens who do not feel able to subscribe to the five or ten dollar cotillions. Nevertheless, those dances seem to be enjoyed by their participants, even if they are less pretentious than the frequenters of Santa Cruz, San José, Del Monte, San Mateo, Castle Crags, and Coronado. Because a person happens.to be poor, that is no reason why he should be denied the privilege of dancing, pro- vided he does not step all over people and bump into everybody, and walk on ladies’ dresses. There is no excuse for such conduct ina man who has social aspira- tions. Such social impediments may be overcome at Mr. W. W. Anderson’s dancing academy, and also at Mr. Lunt’s. Any man who wants to do right should be encouraged rather than abused. And then again I see no reason why a man should be looked down upon by soulless society leaders simply because he did not marry a lady member of one of the cotillion clubs. Everyone is not fortunate enough to get a belle of the Entre Nous, by any means, because there are not enough to go around. What of it if.a big millionaire member of the Parvenu- cracy did see fit to retain the unpretentious girl that he married before he got rich? It is nobody’s business but his own; and why is it that they always ridicule a fellow like that for marrying the only girl who would have him? I mean Mr. Con. O’Connor. I heard so many unkind remarks about this gentleman that I actually felt sorry for him, and went and looked up some references to defend him with. I found that his enemies had a very strong case against him, and that they based their opinions on facts, Although facts are hard to overcome, I propose to show MR. EUGENE A. MANTELL, The popular and talented young designer. One of the best-dressed real gentlemen in America, SOCIETY AS IT REALLY IS. 387 by those very facts, which his enemies have been prod- ding him in the neck with, that he (Mr. O’Connor) is civilized, or at least that he was civilized when he got married. Here is what Owen Meredith has to say ona similar subject : “«We may live without poetry, music, and art ; We may live without conscience, and live without heart ; We may live without friends, and live without books ; But civilized man cannot live without cooks.”’ I would advise all of those heartless creatures who criticise Mr. O’Connor's ‘‘domestic”’ affairs to paste a copy of the above in their hats, and leave the gentleman alone. What would you have him do, anyway? Would you have him eat his food raw? You lucky rascals who marry stylish belles of the Assembly, the Entre Nous, the ‘‘400,” or the Cotillion Club, should give Mr. O’Connor a chance to breathe, if nothing more. In my social observations I have come to regard unjust criticisms of the kind bestowed upon Mr. O’Connor in the light of poisoning your house rats: You kill the rats, ’tis true, but you raise a deuced foul odor. a Concerning the-very latest and most approved methods for organizing cotillion clubs, the most successful organ- izers are the least pretentious. They say that it is no trouble at all to get up a subscription party or ball, pro- vided you go about it properly. Every young lady who goes into society at all must have some friends. Almost any ten young ladies, assisted by ten young gentlemen to do the heavy work, can organize a club in any law-respecting community where they have any stand- ing. All that they have to do is simply to form their 388 CHAMBLISS’ DIARY; OR, committees and circulate the report that a dancing club is being organized, and the members will come in fast enough if they are invited. But you must not freeze them out by making the subscription too high. High priced affairs are all right for the Parvenucracy : gamblers, saloon keepers, and railroad octopuses make their money easily, and can afford to pay their leader large commissions, but decent people cannot. For further information on this subject consult any respectable cotillion leader who has sense enough to know that you can’t get all the nice dancing people ina big city into one dance hall. Good San Francisco authorities to consult are Mr. Eugene A. Mantell, Mr. Robert F. Haight, Mr. Sanford G. Lewald, Mr. Charles W. Spalding, Mr. James B. Stokes, Mr. Edward G. Carrera, Mr. James A. Christie, Mr. Harvy B. Holmgren, Mr. B. Frank Priest, and Mr. Hall McAllister, a nephew of the late Ward McAllister. Apropos of Mr. Ward McAllister, I believe that he had the misfortune to have been misunderstood by the public at large. In organizing his ‘‘Four Hundred” he evi- dently limited its membership to correspond with the dancing capacity of his favorite ballroom. That he desired to set a good example for other ambi- tious leaders to follow was natural toa jolly good-natured man like Ward. That the public declined to fall into his way of thinking was also quite natural, as well as proper. The better elements of American society have never, since the year of 1776, approved of the extension of for- eign aristocracy to these shores, and that which is still more encouraging to the descendants of the F. F. V.’s is that they never will. But poor old Ward McAllister lived and danced his life away, clinging to the absurd idea that it was all right for such adventurers as Andre THE HOODLUM SWELL AND SOCIAL DICTATOR. “ He wears a black necktie, sticks a black handkerchief in his ‘vest,’ blows a tin whistle, and his word is South-of- Market law as far down the road as Butchertown.’— Zar flat Free Dump (J. Power, Editor). SOCIETY AS IT REALLY IS. 391 Poniatowski, or Pony-of-whisky, to come over here and marry Parvenuesses for their dollars. Mr. McAllister evidently believed that the infusion of foreign titled blood into the steam beer blood of California Parvenucracy would improve the latter. Having lived out among those old saloon-keepers, Mr. McAllister was willing that almost any experiment that would tend to civilize their descendants should be tried. But careful intelligent observations of the disastrous failures of these experiments, as shown by the Mackay-Collonna transac- tion, the Prentiss-Huntington-Hatsfeldt international dis- grace, and the latest nauseating transactions between Miss Gould and Count de Castellaine, all go to strengthen the belief that when noble blood becomes so diluted as to sell itself for money taken in over the counters of grogshops and stock-boards, it has ceased to be noble at all. All Americans desiring information on how to con- duct a dancing club composed of the representative mem- bers of the saloon keeper, gambling house keeper, and sporty elements of society should call upon Mr. E. M. Greenway, who is also prepared to give advice on how to malign all social clubs in the city whose members refuse to acknowledge him as anything more than a fake society reporter. When the defunct os Ostros Cotillion Club was in existence, Mr. Greenway used to refer to it as the Mos Ass-tros Club, just because Messrs. Frank E. Webb, Charlie Nosegrave, A. L. Dodge, and Harry Wilber belonged to it. There is no reason why a man should hesitate about expressing his opinions of individuals, pro- vided he is prepared to substantiate those opinions with facts as Mr. Greenway was, but it was very unkind of Ned to give a club such a name as that just in order to describe a few of its would-be leaders—like himself. 392 CHAMBLISS’ DIARY, OR, A few simple rules on arranging parties will, if observed, insure success and a good time : Form your committees and get out your invitations on plain white paper. Do not have any vulgar embossing on the invitation, but have it engraved in neat script. Do not put anything about dress on the invitation unless it is a military affair, because every man fit tc be invited to a dance ought to have sense enough to know that gentlemen always wear evening dress to dances. * Those who don’t know that much are liable to be ignorant of other important rules of good form. Ladies are always up to date in the matter of dress, and need no male advice on that subject further than a quiet gentle hint that it does not sound nicely to masculine ears to hear ladies criticising one another’s gowns at cotillions or anywhere else. One peculiar thing is that the most charming and the prettiest dressed ladies generally are made the victims and targets of the most cruel and uncalled-for insinua- tions of other ladies, who, by reason of the fact that they are permitted to sit and look on while the more fortunate ones dance, are enabled to adjust their green Jorgnettes and look for imaginary defects, and, failing to find any, add more venom to their disappointed criticisms. This is a failing that is particularly noticeable in females who are no longer attractive. One well known example will serve as a description suitable for this class. An extremely uncouth old woman * In all parts of the civilized world except California, the term ‘‘Evening Dress”” means ‘‘swallow-tailed”’ or ‘* claw-hammer’”’ coats for gentlemen. Some San Francisco society leaders insist on saying ‘© Full Dress,” which is absurd. That term applies only to the military, and to societies that wear military uniforms, (Owes ,, 2ISIYAs Ul] JO |[aMS JOALT-JO-YINOG ay} ples ,, ¢ aas ‘aqui siy} UO gaddad sau 3es ou },ule aay J ,, “ “UINS S,UOI'T ay} UL SSW AY] ‘10 ‘ ‘NOILGHDAN LAAULS NOLONIHSVM V LV TIZMS WNTCOOH AHL SOCIETY AS IT REALLY IS, 395 who keeps a ‘fashionable family boarding house” on Pine Street, almost under the shadow of the Hopkins Mansion, which is on the next street a little further up on Snob Hill, has a penchant for posing as a professional chaperon, in order to gain admission to functions where she is not wanted. At a large naval reception that I attended at Mare Island, this ludicrous old creature ‘‘ chaperoned” no less than four young ladies, who were guests at her boarding house. Gentlemen were less abundant than ladies at this function, and the floor committee had its hands full trying to see that all the young ladies got some dances. I saw a young naval lieutenant take one of his brother officers up to introduce him to this quartette, on whose invitation the professional ‘‘chaperon”’ had crept in, when, much to the young officer’s astonishment, the fat old chaperon got up and took his arm, pretending to think that the introduction was intended for her. The gentleman had a pretty hard time getting rid of his undesirable partner, who held on to him in order to tell him that a certain lady, who subsequently turned out to be his fancée, was dressed like a servant girl, The young man then took Mme. Family Boarding House de Veller Blister back to her seat. The four young ladies never got a dance during the evening for the reason that no one else would venture up for an introduction for fear of being victimized by the chaperon. Mothers should be careful about how they trust their daughters out with professional chaperons, and especially those who are addicted to the habit of drinking and gambling, as the one in question was, and still is. Here are some good forms for invitations, which 396 CHAMBLISS’ DIARY; OR, should never be sent to ineligible persons or professional society parasites, but should be addressed in such a way that only the invited guests may obtain admission on them : The Admiral, the Captain and Officers of the U.S. S. Mohican request the pleasure of your company Aboard Ship, Tuesday evening, January twenty-fourth, at eight o'clock. Another good form is: The N.S. L. K. 10, At Home, Friday Evening, April 19, 1895, at half past eight o’clock. Beethoven Hall, N. E. Cor. Post and Powell Streets. Hotel Savoy Building. Here is another : The Cotillion Club requests the honor of Governor and Mrs. James H, Budd’s company at the Charity Ball, in aid of the Children’s Hospital Fund, at the Palace Hotel, Monday Evening, January 7, 1895. Please answer and present this invitation for admission cards to the committee, or at the office of the Palace Hotel. If it is intended that invited guests may keep their invitations as souvenirs of the function, small cards, with the name of your club engraved thereon, should be enclosed with the engraved invitations. ssauany 422905 PUYIST PAVIY—,/A ACJ PApusjUl SEM VONONPO.AUL ayy FYI YULYY OF Surpuajeid ‘wae siy Yoo} pue dn 308 uoaadvyo pjo yy ay} ‘JUStUYSIUOJSE S_19dYJO Sunod ay} 0} yon ,, ‘NOILdAOAN S.IVUINGV AHL LV . WANOId- LINAS » ATWWAA AHL SOCIETY AS IT REALLY TS. 399 Here is a neat form for an admission card : THE ASSEMBLY Golden Gate Hall, 625 Sutter Street, Tuesday Evening, December 20, 1894, 8:45. Admit Ar. LZ. Ernst Phillips and Lady. (Signed) 7. A. Christie, Member. Not transferable. Here is another form for admission cards: THE MONDAY EVENING CLUB. Palace Hotel, Feb. 6, 1893, 8:30 to 12. Admit Lieutenant and Mrs. D. L. Wilson, U.S. N. Issued at the request of Z. Z. Phillips. Please present at Reception Room door, Students generally request your presence about as follows : THE Younc MEN OF CHAMBERLAIN-HUNT ACADEMY Request your presence at a Dance to be given at Odd Fellows’ Hall, Port Gibson, Miss., Tuesday Evening, June roth, 1894. Enclosed with the above invitation was a little card which read, ‘‘ Please present at the door.” Then there were enclosed two other little cards on which were written : Compliments of Misses Jennie and Mary Kate Sevier. Ten dances are quite enough to have between 8:30 and 12 0’clock. Those should be arranged on a very plain white card with the name of your club or organization and date, and 400 CHAMBLISS’ DIARY, OR, where the affair is to be danced, on one side, and the list of dances on the other. Such as the following : ENGAGEMENTS. Ts WaltZa seas oan Se Miss Gould, Qo Lancerss decease Miss Wooll, THE N.S. L. K. to 3. Schottische....... Miss Loomis, Lunr’s Hatt, 4. Polka (5-step) .... Miss Teresi, ; So MV ae ewe en chew Miss Fritchie, Puestay Eaening 6. Deux Temps...... Miss Taylor, february 5, 7. Schottische....... Miss McElroy, 1895. 85 Pollea scusice autancteine Miss McEwen, On Waltz ics vee een Miss Gruenhagen, Io. Spanish Waltz..... Miss Collison. If the dance or entertainment is to be given in honor of someone, the name of the guest of honor should in- variable be engraved on the invitations and the pro- grammes as well. Here is a form : THE YounGc MEN OF HARRISTON, request the honor of the company of Doctor and Mrs. J, W. Davenport, at a farewell dance to be given in honor of Mrs. Robert L. Montgomery, on Monday, May 7th, 1894, at 8:30 p. M. Ladies reception room, the Pioneer Hotel. For a large naval reception that I attended, the invi- tation read : (oostouely ues ‘qnIQ ensvey uoIUy st} 0} sSuojeq wostnog) “£681 ‘Arenue[ ‘souep 19}0H sored & je SaIpel ot} SUOW’ Spied ssouIsnq Sty Surnqriyjsip ,.“3sywed » ‘mos[nod “IL JWN ‘INGNA1IA SIH JO LAO ATLOINLS SOCIETY AS IT REALLY IS. 403 THE OFFICERS OF MARE ISLAND Navy YARD, and of the Ships in Port, request the pleasure of your company at a Farewell Reception to be given Rear Admiral Joun Irwin, U.S. N., At the Sail Loft, April 19, 1893, Dancing. 8:30 P.M. At very large functions of this kind, which only happen once in a great while, dancing is generally kept up until daybreak. But it is not customary at ordinary functions to dance after supper, which is generally announced at midnight. Before leaving the patient reader who has followed me through my long voyages in the great social sea and back to the quiet life of a literary man in New York City,— the national center of wealth, fashion, and poverty,—a few hints to ambitious society leaders may not be out of place. So I will now add a few suggestions which will be found useful to have about the house in any climate. Since those hints have been deduced from information obtained from the leading society men of America, it might be well for the reader to remember some if not all of them: A fondness for nice social gatherings is an excellent sign in young persons who are well-bred. It shows matrimonial inclinations. You cannot conduct a social organization on a money making basis with any degree of real pleasure to its mem- bers. Business and pleasure will not combine in a danc- ing party. ‘‘Dentist’”” N. T. Coulson proved that at a Palace Hotel dance in 1893. Persons who object to marriage, and try to prevent 404 CHAMBLISS’ DIARY, OR, other persons of naturally good inclinations from marry- ing, should be classed as murderers. They would murder the goddess of natural love. Elderly men who pose as ‘‘adopted fathers” are some- times more unreasonable than crazy parents. Persons who appropriate cloaks, hats, shoes, handker- chiefs, and other wearing apparel, and run off with the horses and buggies of other guests at social gatherings, should be considered as robbers, burglars, thieves, and pickpockets. Persons who get more invitations than they should have, and sell the surplus ones to their friends, and then forget to pay their subscriptions, should be classed as bums and tramps. Persons who go to dances under the influence of liquor, and who keep running out between the dances and coming back among the ladies with a disgusting odor of beer, whisky, cloves, and cinnamon bark about their foul mouths, are now regarded as common drunks, toughs, and hoodlums, and are being treated accordingly in making up invitation lists. Persons who are known to be runners for wine houses, and who claim that it is good form to have wine at cotil- lions and bad form to buy it from anybody except them- selves, are now being looked upon the same as saloon- keepers, and are being relegated to tenderloindom, where they belong. Persons who have not the force of character to quit drinking when they are full enough, should always take more solids than liquids. Dentists and doctors who distribute their business cards at cotillions, and send up cards with their business addresses on them when they call upon ladies, are now regarded as quacks. ‘eBplIyIOYY “JS pue ‘ooIsq “We ‘WW ‘preuleg ‘y ‘O 0} ‘ouesng| pres ,‘spmbi] uvy} sprjos colour oye} sAeMe plnoys nod yey} ‘uUsWeTUES ‘pulul ur iveg ,, ‘ALEIOOS ALITOd OL FWOIAGV S.TIGLNVA “AW SOGIBINV TAS TI. REA LEY ls. 407 Lawyers who do similar things are looked upon as shysters. Persons who are always finding fault with cotillion managers who do their best to please all, should be classed as social anarchists. Persons who insist on making speeches at the table Mr. Silas C. Wright. No relation to the ‘“« Fruit-picker,”’ when nobody wants to listen to them, and then get upon the music stand and announce some fake party that nobody would care to attend, should be regarded as society fakirs. Treasurers of charity balls and entertainments who fail to account for the receipts, and then take the admis- sion tickets which the guests deposited at the door and mark ‘‘Complimentary” on those which were paid for, and admit waiters, pawn-brokers, and others at reduced rates, and then try to lay the blame on innocent people, 408 CHAMBLISS’ DIARY. should be classed as society ballot-box stuffers, and should be kicked out bodily. Married people who object to children on the absurd idea that the world is already over-populated should learn that there always was and always will be plenty of room on this planet for properly bred children of both sexes. Persons who ignore their marriage vows are worthy of the confidence of no one who considers an oath binding. Young men who liquidate their board bills at fashion- able boarding houses with the proceeds of private poker games, to which they invite chance acquaintances whom they meet at social gatherings, are being classed as “*fruit-pickers,”’ Women who pose as chaperons in order to get into society to entice young men into-their ‘‘ family board- ing houses” to be victimized are called ‘female fruit- pickers.” Self-elected leaders and dictators of so-called social clubs who claim that a little money and a few fake notices in the third-rate papers give high social standing to all the saloon keepers, gamblers, sports, and prize- fighters who attend their money-making ‘ functions,” should be relegated without unnecessary delay to the ranks of ‘‘colored society.” THE END. FRIDAY NIGHT| COTILLION, | MUSIC. | eee Rilisae ee ; f OF /GREENWAYS +00 peerran) pate Junius JAHN wy THE OUTLOOK IN PARVENUCRACY FOR 1900. Af-ter the ball is o-ver ; Af-ter the truth we see ; Greeny and Birdie in clo-ver, Some-thing like this, will b-e-e. \\ LI ‘ a _ A \ \ \\\ \ x A LAY A \ \\ LY A \ _ \\ ~ ~ \ \< | «