pugs Gornell University Library Sthaca, Nem Pork BOUGHT WITH THE INCOME OF THE SAGE ENDOWMENT FUND THE GIFT OF HENRY W. SAGE 1891 Cc We orne| it: ‘al 47L i ty olin CECIL RHODES Mee tees RB CECIL RHODES THE MAN AND HIS WORK BY ONE OF HIS PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL SECRETARIES GORDON LE SUEUR, F.R.G:S. WITH ILLUSTRATIONS “Moreover, he hath left you all his walks, his private arbours and new-planted orchards, on this side Tiber; he hath left them you, and to your heirs for ever; common pleasures, to walk abroad, and recreate your- selves. Here was a Ceesar! when comes such another?” Julius Cesar, Act It, Se. ii. NEW YORK McBRIDE, NAST & COMPANY 1914 TO MY MOTHER I AFFECTIONATELY DEDICATE THIS BOOK PREFACE In undertaking this work I am complying with the wishes of a great number of friends, more especially Rhodesians, who knew “ the Old Man.” I have no intention of attempting a complete Life or Biography of Cecil Rhodes, but am simply endeavouring to convey an impression of the man and his work formed from what I knew of him and from the anecdotes I retail. I have had the assistance of a very few notes and of one or two stray documents and articles, to the unknown writers of which I tender acknow- ledgment, but nearly the whole is written from memory. Some years ago I designed a more pretentious Life, for the purpose of which I had collected a large amount of material; but the Rhodes Trustees had no faith in my discretion, and I abandoned the work in deference to their wishes, and they purchased my notes and materials. Sir Lewis Michell later got his colleagues to vil viii PREFACE allow him to collect further materials for the use of an official biography. He enlarged this licence, and actually published a Life in two volumes; but no more than any other was this an authorized Life. In addition to Sir Lewis Michell’s work, Sir T. E. Fuller published a monograph and Mr. Philip Jourdan “ Memoirs of Rhodes’s Private Life”; but I do not think that a combination of all three constitutes a real biography, nor will it be easy for any one man to write a complete Life from his own knowledge—those having the capacity not having the intimate knowledge of Rhodes’s private life necessary, and those who possess the knowledge lacking the capacity or inclination. My old friend and colleague, Charles Boyd, C.M.G., Rhodes’s political Secretary and later Secretary to the Rhodes Trustees, could write one. His article on Rhodes in the Dictionary of National Biography portrays the real Rhodes; but the Trustees appear to think “the Old Man’s ” time too recent for the completed story. Rhodes was such a many-sided personality that men associated with him in politics often knew little of his inmost thoughts on social matters, even though, as Sir Thomas Fuller says, they were “ privileged to be on terms of great intimacy with Mr. Rhodes.” PREFACE ix Others, again, who were associated with him closely in various things, and who did not ask him his reasons for his actions in affairs foreign to their particular business and to whom he did not volunteer information, gathered but a one-sided idea of his views. My object is to record anything 1 know of interest to the public, and especially to those who knew Rhodes, Rhodesians more particularly, and to present Rhodes as a human document. Many of the anecdotes will be recalled by others, and people not referred to by name will probably be identified. In dealing with Rhodes’s work I have necessarily had to refer to South African history and South African affairs which I hope will have interest for the general public, and in writing of his private life I have had to speak of myself a good deal, but I trust that any approach to egoism will be forgiven. Moreover, I am not without an uneasy feeling that I have, in some instances, perhaps ventured into over-deep waters ; but with all its defects I present my work to my readers and crave their indulgence. GorRDON LE SUEUR. Car Town, January 1913. II. III. IV. VI. VIL. VIII. IX. XI. CONTENTS EARLY HISTORY . . . . * EARLY DAYS IN’ KIMBERLEY AND FRIENDS . . . . . THE MAN RHODES . . . . RHODES AS AN ORGANIZER . : . RHODES AND THE CAPE AND POLITICS GENERALLY. . . . : RHODES AND THE PUBLIC . 7 5 RHODES AND THE NORTH . ; : THROUGH RHODESIA IN 1897-98 - RHODES AND HIS “ YOUNG MEN” AND MY PERSONAL RELATIONS : . RHODES AND THE TRANSVAAL . . GROOTE SCHUUR, RHODES’ HOME xi PAGB 20 55 61 91 102 141 190 217 243 xii OHAPTER XII. XIII. XIV. XV. XVI. INDEX . : ‘ ‘ ‘ ; : CONTENTS RHODES AND THE DUTCH OF SOUTH AFRICA . . . . . . RHODES’S DAILY LIFE . ; “ ‘: RHODESS LAST DAYS AND THE PRIN- CESS RADZIWILL . . . . THE WILL AND SCHOLARSHIPS . . THE FUNERAL OBSEQUIES AND BURIAL PAGE 266 280 300 321 326 885 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS THE RIGHT HONOURABLE C. J, RHODES, P.C., M.A.y D.C.L. Frontispiece FACING PAGE RHODES’S BEDROOM AT GROOTE SCHUUR . : A . 56 THE AUTHOR ‘ 4 é 3 ; ; . 190 FACSIMILE OF DRAFT LETTER z ‘ Fi : . 240 BATHROOM AT GROOTE SCHUUR . 4 3 : - 254 SOAPSTONE BIRD FROM ZIMBABYE RUINS. ° - . 256 THE HOUSE STEWARD, STEWARD (C. WEBB), AND GAME- KEEPER (WHEELER), WITH THE MATABELE SERVANTS AT GROOTE SCHUUR : ‘ ‘ a ‘ é DUTCH EAST INDIA COMPANY'S MILL, ‘ j ‘ THE LONELY GRAVE IN THE MATOPPOS . . . . xiii, 260 294 826 CECIL RHODES CHAPTER I EARLY HISTORY Ceci, Ruopes was frequently asked his reasons for first going out to Africa. “ Why did I come to Africa?” he once Beil toa friend. “ Well, they will tell you that I came out on account of my health, or from a love of adventure—and to some extent that may be true ; but the real fact is that I could no longer stand the eternal cold mutton.” He probably intended by this to convey that he was tired of home, and he liked giving the impression that he was forced to seek his fortune, but the literal idea that he or any of his were doomed to perpetual cold mutton and a stay-at- home life is of course absurd. He was the fourth son of the Rector of Bishop’s Stortford, the Rev. F. W. Rhodes. His father was twice married, and by his first wife had a daughter, Elizabeth, who married a cousin, another Rhodes; she and Ernest, the third son, being the only ones who married. Of his second marriage there were, in all, eleven 2 2 EARLY HISTORY (cu. I children, nine of whom were sons. Two died in infancy. The eldest son by the second marriage was Herbert ; then Francis (Colonel Frank Rhodes, the Reformer and a distinguished soldier) ; then Ernest, known as “Binfield” Rhodes; then Cecil John ; then Elmhirst, also a soldier ; then Arthur Montagu ; and, lastly, Bernard, another soldier. ‘There were two sisters, Louisa and Edith. / The Rev. F. W. Rhodes was, as a matter of fact, by no means badly off, and the fact that he was able to put four of his sons into the army —one, at all events, into a crack cavalry regiment —disposes of the “ cold mutton ” theory. Cecil Rhodes was fond of alluding to the fact that his grandfather was, as he put it, “a cowkeeper at Dalston.” “1 believe,” he would say, especially when any one spoke of his own ancestry, “ that my ancestor was a keeper of cows.” Herbert, the eldest son, died in 1879 in Central Africa ; his death I shall refer to later. Frank, the second son, entered the army (1st Royals) and rose to the rank of colonel. He par- ticularly distinguished himself at Tel-el-Kebir in 1882 when “Ahmed Arabi, the Egyptian,” was smashed by the British Army under Sir Garnet Wolseley, and he also did good service‘in Uganda He was one of the Reformers sentenced to death after the Johannesburg Crisis of 1895-6, and he afterwards served with Lord Kitchener in the Soudan, being present at Atbara and Omdurman. He was for a short time Administrator of Rhodesia, and after Cecil’s death he inherited Dalham and 1853-70] RHODES’S BROTHERS 3 Denham near Newmarket, but after a trip to the Victoria Falls he contracted blackwater fever and died at Groote Schuur in 1903. “ Frankie” Rhodes was a charming personality and very popular in London society, in which he held an almost unique place. A tablet was erected to his memory at his old school, Eton, and his is not the most insignificant name on the glorious roll of honour of the school. Ernest (“ Binfield”), the third son, went out to Australia in about 1883, after leaving the army with the rank of captain. He married, and later came to Johannesburg as manager of the Con- solidated Goldfields of South Africa. On_ his brother Frank’s death he inherited Dalham, but he, too, died not long afterwards, the property going to his son. Elmhirst, the fifth son, joined the Berkshire Regiment, and specialized in signalling. During the Boer War of 1899 he was Director of Signalling, but left the army after the cessation of hostilities. The next brother, Arthur Montagu, com- menced ostrich-farming at Oudtshoorn, but this undertaking was not a success, and he subsequently settled at Bulawayo. He had several farms on the Bembezi close to Bulawayo, of which he was in possession during the Matabele Rebellion, and on peace being established he put in a claim for mealies which had been destroyed. It amounted to a goodly sum, and doubt was expressed as to the existence of the mealies. Arthur explained that he had supplied the natives with seed grain to grow 4 EARLY HISTORY [cH. I on half shares. Cecil Rhodes had most of these claims submitted to him, and across his brother's he wrote: “ This is the most impudent claim that has yet been submitted.” The youngest brother, Bernard, also became a soldier, but resigned not long before the Boer War of 1899. He rejoined, however, on the outbreak of hostilities. Cecil was very fond of him, but ob- jected to his leading what he called a useless life. A visitor to Groote Schuur, on first meeting Cecil Rhodes, told him that he knew his brother Bernard. ‘“ Ah, yes,” said Rhodes, “ Bernard is a charming fellow; he rides, shoots, and fishes; in fact, he is a loafer.” The Rev. F. W. Rhodes died on February 25, 1878, and lies buried at Fairlight. Of the two sisters, Louisa lived quietly at Iver, near Uxbridge, and Edith, who died in 1904, had a house in Albion Street. Both paid lengthy visits to South Africa. Edith was extremely like her brother Cecil—perhaps more like him than any of his brothers—and had a large share of his determined spirit. Careless in attire, generous to a fault, and sympathetic to a supreme degree, she bore many of his characteristics. She, like Rhodes, was inundated with begging letters, and many must have been the tales of woe poured into her sympathetic ears. Nor was she more expert than her brother in selecting suitable objects for com- passion. ‘Two young men she passed on to me as ““most deserving cases,” whom she said she would vouch for. One of them took a month to embezzle £250, and the other only a fortnight to acquire by 1853-70] MISS EDITH RHODES 5 unique means £160 to give him a start in business. Once while she was staying at the Cape she pro- posed to come and stay at Groote Schuur whilst her brother was there, but he told me to write and decline the pleasure, remarking, “I’m very fond of my sister, and it would be very pleasant to have her here, but I am afraid the house is not big enough for the two of us!” She displayed splendid disregard for conventionalities, and freely asserted her right to independent action. More- over, she possessed a wonderful store of energy, and “had she been a man,” a friend once said, ‘she, too, would have made a new country, or, if there were no more new countries, she would have built an island out in the ocean!” She was immensely pleased when this remark was repeated to her. The estates at Dalston which had belonged to the Rhodes family were bought in by Cecil. Part he presented to the public for a public square, and the remainder was mortgaged for some £70,000 shortly before his death, the money being required for the purchase of Dalham Hall and Denham, near Newmarket, the property of Sir Robert Affleck. At Dalham Rhodes only spent a week- end when he decided to purchase it. He hoped that the bracing air of Newmarket would give him a few more years of life which would have been denied to him in the heat of South Africa, and before his death he strongly craved to get the fresh breezes of Newmarket, the while he panted his breath away in the stifling heat of a Cape summer. The revenue from the Dalston estates he be- 6 EARLY HISTORY [cH. 1 queathed to his family—that is, to his surviving brothers and sisters, with the exception of Frank, to whom he left Dalham and Denham with entail to his heirs and successors, together with a sum to enable him to keep up the estate. The estate, on Frank’s death, went to the next brother, Ernest, who, in turn dying, passed it on to his son. Cecil hoped that Frank would marry and have an heir, but he remained a bachelor. There was a tradition in the Affleck family that whoever came into possession of Dalham would die within the year, and this, strangely enough, was true of Cecil Rhodes and his brothers Frank and Ernest. Cecil Rhodes was born on July 5, 1853, at Bishop’s Stortford, and his early youth does not seem to have been distinguished by anything remarkable, nor does he appear to have given early promise of particular ability or of future brilliance. He was healthy enough, though not particularly athletic. He preferred to spend long hours quietly by himself or in the company of his eldest brother, Herbert, to whom he was devoted. After a more or less uneventful school career he proceeded to Oriel College, Oxford. He was un- decided as to his future vocation ; and although he was at this time intended for the Church, he also attended a few terms at the Inner Temple. He continued his reading at Oxford until 1870, when he developed a slight lung affection, and on account of which he was ordered a long sea voyage. He thereupon went out to Natal to join his favourite brother, Herbert, who was coffee-planting there. CHAPTER II EARLY DAYS IN KIMBERLEY AND FRIENDS In 1870, the year that Cecil Rhodes came out to Natal, the first diamond rush occurred to Kim- berley, and Herbert Rhodes, inspired by the reports of the great diamond finds and tired of farming, made his way to “the fields,” and from there he wrote to his brother to join him: Cecil did so in 1872. The brothers worked a claim together at Colesberg Kop until 1874, but Her- bert’s roving spirit took him towards the North, and he left the diamond-fields and made his way to Central Africa, where he met an awful end in 1879, being burnt to death on the Shiré River. He was pouring out a drink from a demi-john of gin when a spark from his pipe ignited the spirit, causing the demi-john to explode and set his clothing alight. He rushed to the river and: jumped in, but succumbed to his injuries shortly afterwards. Cecil was much aggrieved at a friend of his father’s holding up Herbert’s death as a warning against drink. It was undoubtedly from his brother Herbert, as Rhodes often said himself, that he first became imbued with his great ideas of acquiring the 7 8 EARLY DAYS IN KIMBERLEY [cH. II hinterland of the southern colonies for the _ British Empire. Herbert was strongly inspired by the idea of expansion northwards that after- wards induced his brother to pass his hand over the map of Africa and say, ‘*‘ Africa all Red ; that is my dream.” Rhodes felt Herbert’s death very keenly, and in after-years had a tombstone erected to his memory over his grave in Central Africa. Cecil Rhodes’s experiences as a digger were much the same as those of the others, but he often. referred to the luck that followed him on the fields. He used to tell a story of his giving a picnic on the Vaal River to a number of friends. The cost of this picnic was £40, and after luncheon he walked down to the river, where amongst the pebbles he picked up a diamond which in Kim- berley he sold for just £40. He once told me a story of his having, in 1876, had a contract for pumping a mine dry, and he was left in charge of the engine. He did not understand steam, and suddenly he heard the engine safety-valve hissing, and after one look he turned and fled for his life, leaving the engine to its fate. At Kimberley the first great event of his life evolved—the amalgamation of the diamond dig- gings and the formation in 1888 of the De Beers Consolidated Mines, Ltd., one of the greatest and wealthiest private corporations the world has ever known, the powers granted under its articles of association being practically unlimited. He went backwards and forwards to Oxford 1870-88] “BARNEY BARNATO” 9 several times from Kimberley. He only matricu- lated in 1873, but in 1881 took his degrees of B.A. and M.A. It was in 1877, on one of his journeys back to Kimberley, that Sir Charles Warren, who was a fellow-passenger in the post-cart, saw him studying a small book, and on inquiry found it was the Book of Common Prayer. . It was at Kimberley that Rhodes became asso- ciated with the late Barnett Isaacs, who called himself Barnato Isaacs Barnato, and was familiarly known as “ Barney.” The latter, a Jewish digger, half prize-fighter and half music-hall artiste, had a peculiar faculty in one direction, and that was money-making. Gardner Williams said of him in * South Africa” that “one could scarcely have cast him in any society or any place on earth where his nimble wits would not have won him a living.” As a preliminary to amalgamation, Rhodes had formed a small combination of interests in 1880 called the De Beers Diamond Mining Company, and Gardner Williams records an interesting fact, that one of the first cheques was one of £5, drawn by Rhodes as an advance against his salary as secretary. Rhodes and Barnato soon came to loggerheads, for “ Barney” was supposed to represent the illicit diamond-buyers in the community. He was of course representing various interests, and had formed the Central Diamond Mining Company, and had to be considered in the amalgamation, albeit Rhodes had bought large interests in the companies Barnato represented. ‘The actual facts of the negotiations with “Barney” are not of 10 EARLY DAYS IN KIMBERLEY [cH. 1! supreme importance, but the following curious story has been very widely accepted as true :. Rhodes and his people were for a long time unable - to come to terms with “ Barney ” and his faction. The former had for some time been negotiating with the Rothschilds with the view to the con- solidation of the mines, which he knew to be vital to the existence of the diamond trade. He knew that if individual diggers could sell their diamonds as they pleased it meant a death-blow to the diamond industry, and that its salvation lay in control of the output being obtained, and to this end Brazilian properties were, later on, acquired by De Beers and closed down. The peculiar market for stones necessitated regulation of the supply, and an amalgamation of the various interests only could prevent the unrestricted sale of diamonds. Rhodes required some weeks to complete his arrangements for the formation of his great trust, but Barnato had a large stock of diamonds ready sorted for the market (any one who knows any- thing of diamonds is aware of the number of classes into which the stones have to be sorted for sale). Barnato threatened to place these stones on the market at once unless his terms were agreed to. The placing of these stones before Rhodes’s negotiations were complete would have been ruinous, and had to be prevented at any cost. A meeting was arranged, and the scene must have been picturesque with “ Barney” sitting with a. complacent smile, master of the situation, Rhodes, with the impatience he never could conceal, stamp- ing in abortive rage, and Alfred Beit nervously 1870-88 | A BUCKET OF DIAMONDS 1 twitching with the sway of the pendulum, whilst in parcels on sheets of white paper on a side-table lay the carefully sorted stones, unconscious cause of all the turmoil. In the midst of a discussion Rhodes rose, and taking Barnato by the arm walked him up and down the room, and then to the side-table where the stones lay, and said, “ Barney, have you ever seen a bucket-full of \ diamonds? J never have. I'll tell you what I'll do. If these diamonds will fill a bucket, I'll take them all over from you at your price.” Then, hardly giving him time to answer, Rhodes swept the stones into a bucket standing handy. (How the bucket came to be there so opportunely history does not relate.) The stones did not fill it, how- ever, and Rhodes, with a glance round, strode from the room. The amalgamation was accomplished, for he had got the delay that he wanted, and as Barnato turned to face the astonished gaze of those seated there he only then realized that he was no longer a factor in the negotiations, as the re-sorting of his diamonds for market meant a matter of weeks. Whether the story is true or not, after an all-night sitting terms were arrived at, and the interests of the Central Diamond Mining Com- pany were bought in for De Beers for £5,338,650, a very useful cheque ! Rhodes always displayed the highest affection for Oxford, where he said he came in contact with the best of England’s youth. Any Oxford man was sure to find himself in his good graces, and it was a proud day in his life when, in 1899, his old college 12 EARLY DAYS IN KIMBERLEY (cH. u conferred on him the honorary degree of Doctor of Civil Law. The honour was at the same time conferred on Lord Kitchener. At Oxford he first met Sir Charles Metcalfe, Rochfort Maguire, and Alfred (now Viscount) Milner, who were associated with him in his life’s work. -Sir Charles Metcalfe was his constant companion, and Rhodes took particular delight in his company on the veld. He would retail stories to Rhodes’s great edification, and especially tales of gallantry and conquests which would amuse Rhodes im- mensely. After Sir Charles had left him, he would look round beaming and say, “Do you know, I really think Metcalfe honestly believes those stories are true!” Sir Charles, whilst being a most ener- getic man, and for his proportions quite athletic, had a most lethargic habit. After dinner he would put a big cigar into the corner of his mouth and apparently fall into deep slumber—in fact, I have known him go to sleep between the courses at dinner. When, however, he was thought to be fast asleep, something would be mentioned in which he was interested, and he would immediately open his eyes and take as active a part in the conversation as if he had attentively followed it all. Sir Charles threw himself into Rhodes’s work with zest, and as Consulting Engineer to the Rhodesia Railways he did much to give effect to Rhodes’s ideas for railway extension. On one occasion Sir Charles was speaking to me on the choice of a career. ‘ Well,” he said, “it all depends on the man himself. J wanted to be a lawyer, but my father said I should become a judge, 1870-88] SIR CHARLES METCALFE 13 and that every judge died of sitting too long on the bench, so I went in for engineering, but I have no doubt that had I gone in for the law I should have risen to the top of that profession just as I have in the one I have adopted.” Sir Charies rather prided himself on being a great judge of wine, which reminds me of a visit paid to Groote Schuur by a couple of men from Home who were said to have a nice taste in wine. The conversation turned on Cape wines and the reputation enjoyed by Cape Constantia of the middle of the eighteenth century. “ Ah,” said Sir Charles, “ but they make a very good wine now. In fact, Rhodes has some in his cellar which you will find excellent.” I then told one of the servants to decant a bottle of the Constantia, and presently he returned with it. A glass was poured out for each of the visitors and one for Sir Charles ; they tasted the wine and exclaimed on its quality, declaring it excellent. Sir Charles passed his glass before his nose two or three times in the approved taster’s fashion to get the bouquet, and then tasted it. “Aha,” said he, “do you note the flavour ? Isn’t it quite good stuff? The fruitiness of it— not the fruitiness of port, mark you, but the true flavour of the grape ?” “ Really,” said one of the visitors, ‘‘ I had no idea they made such wine at the Cape.” Just then the servant came round to me and said in an undertone, “I’m very sorry, sir, but that was the 54 Port I decanted by mistake.” I said nothing, but told Rhodes quietly afterwards, and Sir Charles never heard the end of it. 14 EARLY DAYS IN KIMBERLEY (cH. II Rochfort Maguire was another Oxford friend who was long associated with Rhodes and his work. He with C. D. Rudd and F. R. Thompson (« Matabele”) went up to Bulawayo in 1888 and spent a considerable time at the Royal Kraal bongaing! to Lo Bengula, and finally secured the concession upon which the British South Africa Company was formed. At Kimberley Rhodes made many friendships and connections which lasted throughout his life. Sir Julius Wernher and Alfred Beit—afterwards the founders of the great financial house of Wernher, Beit & Co.—were then fellow-clerks. Julius Wernher came to Kimberley in 1871 and | Alfred Beit in 1875. Beit, a Hamburg Jew, - diminutive in stature, weak in health, and timid _ physically to a degree, was yet a master of finance, - and for sheer financial abilities outshone all his contemporaries. In common with many of his race he had an intense admiration for qualities which he felt he himself lacked, and so Rhodes’s strength, disregard of consequences, and fearless- ness superlatively appealed to him, and Beit be- came one of the staunchest Imperialists I have ever met, and never hesitated an instant when Rhodes chanced to lead. At Kimberley, too, Rhodes became associated with C. D. Rudd, who was afterwards to become his partner in the Rudd-Rhodes Syndicate, pro- moters of the British South Africa Company. 1 Bongaing, lit. ‘ kowtowing.” The warriors run up to the royal footstool and bonga by shouting out the king’s praises in the most extravagant terms. 1870-88] EARLY PHILANTHROPY | 15 C. D. Rudd became a partner of Rhodes in 1873 in diamond-mining enterprises, and in 1886 he accompanied Rhodes to the Witwatersrand, where now stands Johannesburg. Rudd bought a fine estate at Newlands, “ Fernwood,” marching with Groote Schuur, but on retiring to live in England he sold the estate to a land syndicate, by whom it was cut up into lots. Even in these early Kimberley days Rhodes practised almost indiscriminate philanthropy. Bishop Gaul, late Bishop of Mashonaland, who! was Archdeacon in Kimberley, used to relate that, \ when a man got ill or a family in straitened | circumstances required a holiday to the coast, he had only to approach Rhodes, who, on being _ satisfied that “the case” was a deserving one, — would ask him how much he required to provide for their needs, and write out a cheque for an amount which would provide proper treatment — for the sick person or a sorely needed trip to the seaside for the distressed family. Rhodes’s alternate on the De Beers Board of Directors was the late Captain 'yson, known to ‘ all Kimberley as “Tim.” A genial nature and a good friend, he probably had not an enemy in the world. Resembling Rhodes in features, he was the cause of much merriment in the way he imitated him, even copying his hand-play and developing Rhodes’s squeak and the falsetto notes in his voice. During the Kimberley siege “Tim” Tyson rendered yeoman service in the commissariat department. 16 EARLY DAYS IN KIMBERLEY [cH. 1 Rhodes also met Dr. (Sir Starr) Jameson at Kimberley, where they were close friends. He was rightly looked upon as the first in his pro- ‘fession in Africa, and had an enormous practice. He has a charming personality ; and although he has not the same wide circle of friends in South Africa as Rhodes had, there were none who got to know him intimately but were fascinated by his peculiar charm of manner. He has tremendous power of concentration and singular administrative ability. Brilliant beyond measure, he was only handicapped by a feeling acquired after the Raid that he was a failure. Dr. Jameson was afflicted with shyness, but, as he himself said, no nervousness, and he is unexcelled in physical courage. He was bored to extinction by politics, and on his entering the arena in 1898 it was only a strong sense of duty and loyalty towards Rhodes that induced him to stay in Africa at all, more especially as the Progressive Party, headed by Sir Thomas Fuller, objected to his candidature in the Progressive interest until he had in sackcloth and ashes in some way atoned for his crime. Since Rhodes’s death the same sense of loyalty towards his late friend kept him interested in affairs, and the fact that he has thrown himself heart and soul into work that he personally detests and brings him into contact with many people he despises, proves his strength and the manner of man he is. “ Three acres and a cow in Sussex,” he often said, comprised the sum-total of his ambitions. 1870-88] ILLICIT DIAMONDS 17 The old Kimberley community was a strange mixture of humanity. They were all there with one object, and that was to make money out of diamonds. Most men who made fortunes did so by legitimate speculation, but in the community generally to bring off a deal in illicit stones was rather looked on as smart business than a criminal act. There is a story told of three brothers in a family who had got possession of a large parcel of illicitly acquired stones, and they tossed up as to which of them should take the parcel to England. The winner started off on horseback for the Border, and shortly afterwards, on reflection, the two remaining brothers decided that they had acted somewhat unwisely and determined that all should go together. Hastily saddling up, they rode after and caught up the brother, and informed him of their decision that all three should go with the diamonds. “ What diamonds?” said he, and disclaimed all knowledge of any diamonds. Expostulations and threats had no effect upon him, and it was not until one of his brothers put a bullet into his leg that an amicable settlement was arrived at. De Beers used to have a staff of natives who did practically nothing but report on new finds. | These “boys” used to live in Kimberley and | received high wages, but as soon as a new diamond © prospect was reported one or two of them would’ 3 18 EARLY DAYS IN KIMBERLEY (CH. 1 discard their European clothing and don the blankets of the raw native and then set off and apply for work at the new field. After having been at work for a short while, these boys would take their discharge or desert, and returning to Kimberley hand in a full report on the possibilities and prospects of the claims; and in this way De Beers were kept fully informed of the probable value of every new discovery. Large numbers of stones were of course stolen in the compounds, and even here De Beers found it profitable to employ men to go about amongst the natives and buy from them stones which they had secreted. With the formation of the De Beers Consoli- dated Mines, Ltd., the first great work of Rhodes’s life was completed, and he had acquired the wealth necessary to carry out the big ideas for northern expansion and time to devote to politics. He with Barnato, Beit, and F. S. Philipson-Stow were appointed life governors of De Beers, and they divided the profits, after deductions for divi- ‘ dends. The average amount so divisible was about £150,000 a year. Philipson-Stow’s share was bought by Rhodes, and this left only three life governors. Then, in 1897, Barnato threw himself overboard from the ship on which he was voyaging home to England and was drowned. . This occurred towards the end of June, and the life governors’ dividend was to be declared at the end of the month, and so the whole went to the survivors, Rhodes and Beit. 1870-88] DEATH OF BARNATO 19 When the news arrived, Rhodes cabled to Beit, saying that he had heard that Barnato’s widow had not been left very well provided for, the bulk of the fortune going to Barnato Brothers, and he asked if Beit were willing that the share to which Barnato would ordinarily be entitled should be paid to the widow. Beit immediately acquiesced, and they agreed to forgo Barnato’s share. Rhodes ° was terribly enraged when he heard afterwards — that instead of going to the widow the amount was claimed by and paid to Barnato Brothers, especially as his private account was at the time largely overdrawn. It was about 11 o'clock at night in the train near Vryburg on the way to the North that I received the cable saying that Barnato had jumped overboard. Rhodes had retired, and _I refrained from waking him up, and waited till the morning, when I took him the message. He was furious at my not giving it to him the night be- fore, and said, ‘I suppose you thought this would affect me and I should not sleep. Why, do you imagine that I should be in the least affected if you were to fall under the wheels of this train now ?” He tried to give the impression of being without feeling, but nothing is more absurd. He was crammed with sentiment to his finger-tips, but adopted a brutal manner and rough exterior to cover up the weakness of sentiment, and thus many a broken-hearted man and woman left him with the impression—entirely erroneous—that he was a callous brute lacking in human sympathy. CHAPTER III THE MAN RHODES Ceci, RuoprEs was a tall and powerful-looking man, just under six feet in height, but longer in the back than in the legs. He had piercing light steel-blue eyes and a wealth of curly locks which had turned grey in early life. In after-years he put on fat rapidly, and his face became florid and puffy, due doubtless to the heart affection and derangement of blood-vessels from which he suffered. He weighed in 1897 just over fifteen stone—about the same weight as Grimmer and I, Sir Charles Metcalfe being a little heavier. I remember Rhodes once chaffing Jack Grimmer about his weight, saying that owing to his and my indolent habits we weighed as much as he and Metcalfe did. “Yes,” replied Jack, ‘‘ but you see, Le Sueur and I are hard muscle and bone, but you and Metcalfe are all blubber.” It is not generally known that he was left- handed, and that the little finger of his right hand was bent at the middle knuckle, so that he could not straighten it. He was very sensitive about that little finger, and it will be seen in all his photographs that he is careful to keep the right 20 1897] CARELESS ATTIRE 21 hand covered, and those who have shaken hands with him will have noticed how he kept the third and little finger doubled up. As we were much of a size, Grimmer and I could wear nearly all his clothes, and we found this very useful on the veld, as he used to give away our kit to the natives, and we were able to replenish from his stock, and so went about with “C. J..R.” on our shirts and socks. He always wore the same style of hat when on the veld or at Groote Schuur—a soft squash felt, the crown of which he would bend into a cup shape—a style favoured by Boer farmers. When he went out, he wore a peculiarly shaped brown bowler, and I have never seen him wear any other shape. He was careless about his dress, and the ordering of his clothes was, as a rule, left to his valet, Antony de la Cruz (“ Tony ”), who ordered his pepper-and- salt tweed suits, his hats, and his white flannel trousers by the dozen. When in dress clothes, he invariably wore a black waistcoat, and as a rule displayed two or three inches of white shirt-front between the bottom of the waistcoat and top of the trousers. He nearly always wore ties of similar pattern— a sailor-bow of blue with white spots—and he invariably wore buttoned boots. When travelling, “ Tony ” used to carry two large kit-bags of clothes, but “the Old Man” would make a favourite of one particular coat and wear it day after day. On our way to Salisbury in 1897 he one day burnt a large hole in the front of a favourite old coat, \ 22 THE MAN RHODES [cH. 11 which was, moreover, splashed in front with grease —in fact, a good subject for the rag-picker’s basket. Arrived at Salisbury, however, he told me to send the coat to the tailor and have it cleaned and mended. I did so, and received it back the next day with the following note: “Dear Sir,—Herewith the Right Honourable C. J. Rhodes’s coat uncleaned and unmended. We regret that all we can do with the garment is to make a new coat to match the buttons.” On another occasion on the veld a very cold shap came on one evening, and I felt the need of a coat, for, as a rule, I spent the day in shirt- sleeves. I did not own a coat at the time, how- ever, Rhodes having disposed of my kit “in gratuities.” Accordingly I went across to Tony, and after a search through one of the Old Man’s kit-bags I selected one partly worn, but which I had not seen him wear. Arrayed in this, I joined Rhodes at dinner, and he, suddenly stopping with his soup-spoon raised half-way to his mouth, said, ‘‘ Why, you’ve got my coat on!” “ Nothing of the sort,” said I. ‘“ You have got my coat on,” he said, rising and coming round to my side of the little camp-table, “‘ and damn it, it is my best coat too! Come here; come and take it off; I'll give you another one.” Leaving his dinner, he marched off to Tony’s wagonette, where he rummaged through a kit-bag and produced a brand new coat, which he handed over to me, saying, “ There you are—you can have this; but I don’t want you to wear my best coat.” Amongst us, his “ young men,” we always spoke 1897] “THE OLD MAN” 23 of him as “the Old Man” or “the Chief,” and many of his colleagues dropped into the habit. Even Captain Penfold, who was many years his senior, used to talk of him as “the Old Man.” I remember once on my way up to Bulawayo I saw Penfold at Kimberley, and he said, “ Well, how is the Old Man?” I started teasing him by saying, «Well, I shouldn’t care to be in your shoes ; he’s simply mad about De Beers’ cutting off supplies, and he is coming up next week just to talk to the directors.” Poor Penfold was quite distressed. “No, hang it, no, I can’t stand any more,” he said ; “Tm going to chuck it; Ill resign and clear out. I can’t stand it any longer,” and that was about the way in which the directors felt about “the Old Man.” When talking at table, he had a habit of leaning forward on his elbows, now and again passing his hand over his face with a lightning rub, and then he would, in making a reply, sit bolt upright and throw his head back with a smile, putting his cigarette down on the table-cloth. He would often walk up and down in pyjamas, and then he would rub his hands up and down his ribs, and at other times when dressed he would stick his hands down inside his trousers. (He seldom wore a waistcoat.) When interested or amused, he would give a sort of preliminary whine—like a long-drawn-out M—and on occasion his voice would go off into a sort of falsetto, especially if he were angry or excited. He never cared for jewellery, and never wore 24 THE MAN RHODES [CH. II even a watch. His watches and such articles of jewellery as he possessed were kept locked away in a plate closet. In walking he took a quick short step; his toes turned in, and he seemed almost to tread upon his own feet. His hands he carried either thrust into his jacket pockets or one hand in his pocket and the other with closed fingers sharply swinging. So much has been written about the question of drink that one must perforce say something about it, though it is a subject that might well have been left alone. Rhodes has been called an habitual drunkard, and it has been stated time and again by more moderate detractors that he frequently drank to excess. Rhodes was no drunkard. In the old Kimberley mining days, as in all new and rough communities of the sort, where most of the possessors of sudden and easily acquired wealth knew of no loftier use to which to put it than indulgence in various forms of vice, hard drinking was much more the rule than the exception. It would be strange, indeed, if Rhodes, working as an ordinary miner as he did, did not “do his whack ” with the rest, especially as his heart trouble would naturally incline him to stimulants. He liked his champagne in a tumbler, and at lunch or at dinner had a habit of tossing off the glass absent-mindedly. After meals he would have his favourite Russian kimmel, of which he would often have five or six liqueur glasses in the course of after-dinner conversation, 1897] DRINKING AND SMOKING 25 His system required stimulant, and he was fond of a mixture of champagne and stout in the fore- noon, but as a rule he drank only with his meals, and certainly not to an extent to incapacitate him. To those who do not know the conditions under which we live in Africa the amount consumed by him might seem large, but he had a horror of the “nipping ” habit, and it is absurd to accuse him of being a drunkard. When thirsty, I have known him take a long draught of pure water, and say, as he wiped away with his palm the drops which he generally allowed to trickle down his chin, “ By Jove! if people had to pay five shillings a bottle for that, I don’t believe they would drink anything else.” As to smoking he only smoked cigarettes which were imported direct from Cairo for him, and the resourceful Tony always had a supply on hand in the same way that he always had his particular brand of Blantyre coffee (he never drank any other) and his Russian kiimmel. He _ never smoked a pipe nor cigars, and seldom smoked before luncheon, but after lunch and dinner he would sit and smoke one cigarette after another, lighting the next one at the stump of the one he had finished. He never carried a cigarette-case about with him. He always spoke much better at the after luncheon or after dinner-table if he had a cigarette going, and seemed to feel lost without one. One night on the veld we had run out of cigarettes. 1 got from a wayside store some very vile so-called “ Virginia” cigarettes, probably 26 THE MAN RHODES [cu. 111 made of hay. He pretended to like them, and said, “These are very light—quite a pleasant change from the heavy Egyptian tobacco.” On another occasion in the Matoppos the supply of cigarettes ran out, and after dinner I made some out of Boer tobacco and the thinnest paper I could find ; but though he lighted them again and again he only regarded them with a pitying eye. He had one curious habit ; he would never light his cigarette with a match. When he wanted a cigarette and I was not smoking, he would say to me, “Take a cigarette.” I would take one and light it, and then he would reach over and say, “ Now give me a light,” and light his cigarette at mine. When talking at dinner, he would absent-mindedly put his lighted cigarette down anywhere, and many were the damask table-cloths at Groote Schuur ruined by being burnt through by cigarette ends. The top of a leathern bridge-box also made a suit- able depository for burning cigarette ends. This habit of his might have resulted in serious and unpleasant consequences once while we were camped on the veld. He and I were sleeping in a coach, the wooden seats of which were covered with leather stuffed with coir. I retired early, and our only joint covering was a big sheepskin kaross.! Rhodes came to rest smoking a cigarette and turned in (we slept in our clothes, only removing boots), but about 2 a.m. I was awakened by a stinging burn on the hand. I thought at first that Tony ‘ Kaross—rug made of hides of small antelopes, jackals, etc. The sheepskin is the cheapest and most serviceable, 1897] COMPARISON TO CLIVE 27 had spilled the boiling early-morning coffee over me, but I then found that the kaross was smoulder- ing, and a large hole burnt through the hide. Rhodes awoke, and we put the kaross out of the door. Then I got a lantern and found that the whole of one section of the seat was aglow. The coir blazed up as we disturbed it, and to get rid of it I tore the section of seat off its hinges. The wooden seat was just about burnt through, and there were one thousand cordite cartridges packed underneath and flush up against it ! There was a strange facial resemblance between Rhodes and some of the Roman Cesars, but his was rather the physiognomy of a Nero, although he personally considered himself like the Emperor Hadrian, and he was once surprised by a friend standing and stroking his nose before a portrait of Hadrian. He was not displeased at being spoken of amongst a certain set in London as “the Em- peror.” Typically Roman were the forehead with the curly locks, the flashing eye, and the set of the under-lip. . Sir Lewis Michell in his work compares him to — the Caesars, Napoleon, and Clive; and he certainly possessed many Napoleonic traits, but they were rather little mannerisms, such as the little tweak of the ear by which Napoleon used to evince his pleasure towards his marshals and the brusque and unconventional things he used to say to women, than characteristics. He would have scorned to engineer a propaganda of lies to win public sympathy as Napoleon did, and his soul would have abhorred the theatrical pageantry which Napoleon employed. 28 THE MAN RHODES [cH. 11 If a comparison is needed of his actual methods, it lies rather in Bismarck’s than Napoleon’s. But were one to try and summarize Rhodes, Elphin- stone’s estimate of Clive’s character would be found strangely applicable. Like Clive he left an “impression of force and grandeur; a masculine understanding ; a fine judgment ; an inflexible will, little moved by real dangers, and by arguments and menaces not at all. He exercised a supreme con- trol over those who shared his counsels or executed his resolves. Men yielded to a pressure which they knew could not be turned aside, and either partook of its impulse or were crushed by its progress.” Like Clive, too, “he meets the most formidable accusations, with bold avowal and a confident justification. He makes no attempt to soften his enemies or conciliate the public, but stands on his merits and services with a pride which in other circumstances would have been arrogance.” A mind endowed with the qualities his held rises high above ordinary imperfections. “At worst it is a rough-hewn Colossus, where the irregularities of the surface are lost in the grandeur of the whole.” ’ It is possible that the resemblance to Clive presents itself to one’s mind as a natural conclusion from the fact that the lives and energies of both men were devoted more or less to a similar end, and that each found the necessity of employing similar tools and methods towards the consummation of their ideals. They were both great Englishmen, both were animated by intense patriotism and superlative ' Elphinstone’s ‘‘Rise of the British Power in the East.” Murray. 1897] COMPARISON 'TO CLIVE 29 loyalty, and both did render “ great and meritorious services to their country.” Rhodes’s inflexible will carried him through many a situation where a less determined man would have been appalled by the difficulties beset- ting him ; he was as little moved by the real danger by which he was confronted in his negotiations with the Matabele rebels or the real danger which was ever present when he first cast in his lot with the revolutionary movement in Johannesburg, as he was by the arguments and menaces of his opponents in the Cape House of Assembly. He exercised a control over his colleagues on the De Beers’ Board of Directors, “who shared his counsels,” and over his colleagues in his Ministry to a ridiculous extent. He would walk in late to a meeting of De Beers’ Directors, and the minutes of the last meeting having hardly been read, he would start on the agenda and run through them, giving his own views something like this: ‘“ Of course, what we have got to do here is so and so; I think we are all agreed about that. Just enter that in the minutes [to the secretary] as proposed and carried ; and now about so and so,” and the same with regard to the rest. “That’s all for this morning, I think,” he would add, and walk out, leaving his colleagues thinking over resolu- tions and amendments they intended to bring forward. When De Beers’ Directors—backed up by Lord Rothschild (representing French shareholders)— protested against the use he was making of De Beers’ funds, they were forced to yield to the pressure he 30 THE MAN RHODES [CH. IIL applied, and were only too glad to partake of its impulse to allay the storm their action created. The formidable accusations hurled against him in connection with the Raid he certainly met with bold avowal and confident justification, even sang-froid, and listened to the evidence against him with amused interest, munching sandwiches and drinking stout the while. Nor does he make any attempt to conciliate the public when he has to answer for his actions, but arrogantly stands on his merits and aggravates his judges by saying that he is coming to face their “unctuous recti- tude.” Rhodes was on terms of great intimacy with General Charles Gordon (‘‘ Chinese Gordon”), who wished him to accompany him to the Soudan. Rhodes, however, refused, saying that his work lay in the south. Gordon is said to have told him the story of his having been offered a room- ful of silver in China which he had refused, and to have asked Rhodes what he would have done. “ Why, taken it, to be sure,” said Rhodes, “and as many more as they liked to give me; for what is the earthly use of having ideas if you haven’t the money to carry them out ?” Opprobium was heaped upon Clive because he acquired wealth in India, but it is certain that if Clive coveted wealth he, like Rhodes, only looked upon the possession of wealth as a means of gratifying ambition, for “what is the earthly use of having ideas if you have not the money to carry them out?” and, moreover, not for the gratification of ambition for personal aggrandise- 1897] A VALIANT TRENCHERMAN 31 ment, but for that of the Great Empire which both men served so well; but as “South Africa ” has said, “ History will give Rhodes his true place in the roll of Englishmen whose one thought has been the glory of their country.” In everything the man was big, although his greatness has in certain quarters only been acknowledged to lie in his faults. Rhodes was a valiant trencherman—one might almost call him a gross feeder. On the veld he liked getting the joint in front of him, and cutting off great hunks of meat; and at home at Groote Schuur he would get up and go to a side-table, carve for himself, and carry over to his plate on his fork what he carved. When making a voyage, he always sent a cow on board in order to have fresh milk, and also a crate with a couple of dozen laying hens to provide fresh eggs, and these were killed during the voyage. As the cows were not allowed to be landed in England, they were, on arrival at Southampton, presented to the cook or butcher and slaughtered. He also, as a rule, carried his own brand of champagne and _ his favourite kiimmel. -An amusing story occurs to mind anent this. I was in a drawing-room at Kimberley once, and of those present I only knew my hostess. There were two ladies to whom I had not been introduced sitting near talking of Rhodes, and I suddenly heard my name men- tioned ; I caught my hostess’s eye, and we heard, to our amusement, one go on to speak of Rhodes’s habit of having a crate of fowls on board, and related how on one occasion he had told me to 32 THE MAN RHODES [CH. 111 get a couple of the hens killed, and I replied that some were laying and some not, and it seemed a pity to kill the layers. “ Well,” Rhodes said, “you can watch them, can’t you, and see which are laying?” I was said by the narrator to have replied that the hens only laid at night. “Then,” said she, “Rhodes got very angry, and _ said, ‘Surely you can get a lantern, and sit up with them at night.’” Of course, there was no truth in this tale, but it is only one of the many that were told of Rhodes and his “young men,” having as much foundation in fact. Before leaving England on his last voyage in January 1902, on the “Briton,” he had become rather more fastidious about his food. A crate of hens was sent down from the Salvation Army farm, but he told me to get a supply of preserved meats, etc. I went to Messrs. Fortnum & Mason’s, and a large stock of all manner of things—in cans, in porcelain, and glass—was sent on board and put under Tony’s charge. Naturally I had to have a large variety, and so ordered only a few dozen of each, as it was impossible to tell which he was likely to care for. Moreover, there were five in the party—Rhodes, Dr. Jameson, Sir Charles Metcalfe, the Hon. William Grenfell, and myself—and all shared in the “extras.” Every- thing went smoothly at first, but at last Rhodes struck some potted thing he particularly liked, and in a few days there was none left. I ex- plained that only a few dozen of each had been ordered, or the ship would have been filled; as it was, a third-class cabin was turned into a store- 1902] PHYSICAL COURAGE 33 room, and it was packed from top to bottom. Tony was sent for, but he could not unearth any more of the delicacy, and Rhodes turned to me. saying, “I believe you will die in a workhouse yet.” Of course, none of the food on board— which, as a matter of fact, is excellent—pleased him after that, and as he sent away one dish after another he said, “ Really, Donald Currie ought to be hanged by the neck.” While Rhodes’s conduct during the Rebellion and his incursion into the Matoppos into the midst of the Matabele (although he used to say frequently, “I was never in such a funk in my life,” in speaking of tight corners he had been in) give the impression of remarkable courage, I never considered that he really possessed physical courage. His moral courage is not in question ; but, as has been said, he would have been “ more afraid of being thought afraid.” ‘Not to fear to be thought afraid” has been described as true bravery, but it is not the physical courage Clive possessed, nor Paul Kruger when he faced wounded lions, and when, his thumb being shattered by his gun bursting, he calmly took out his pocket-knife and amputated it.’ Kruger, of course, had the knowledge behind him of perfect physical condition and great brute strength, and he probably was not highly sensitive to physical pain—as in the thumb-cutting episode. ! Kruger used to tell the story of his gun having burst and shattered his thumb, and said that he sharpened his knife on his ‘‘ veldschoen,” then took the end of his thumb in his mouth, placed the knife in position, and fixing his eyes on a white stone about twenty yards in front he suddenly slashed, and the thumb came off in his mouth ! 4 34 THE MAN RHODES [CH. 11 I think the pain and the sight of his own blood would have made Rhodes sick. He could not endure physical pain, and on several occasions when he was lying in bed ill and in pain I have seen the tears welling up in his eyes and trickling down his cheeks ; yet in his final illness he bore excruciating pain with remarkable fortitude. He always had a dread of a long, lingering illness and a painful death ; and one day, talking to me with Dr. Rutherfoord Harris, he said, “ You and Harris will probably die of cancer in the throat and linger on in agony, but I shall go off suddenly without any pain; I may go off while I am talking to you now ; this”—thumping himself on his heart— will kill me, but I shan’t suffer”; and yet he suffered agonies during his last illness, and had an exceedingly painful end. He had a strange strain of nervous- ness in him too. At Groote Schuur one day he noticed a large dry branch on one of the oaks at the back of the house. It was rather unsightly, and he suggested its being lopped. ‘ Can’t you shoot it off?” he said. I got a rifle and broke off a large part of it, but the main part was too thick to be smashed off with a bullet. So I sent to the stable-yard for a boy with an axe. Rhodes and I stood looking on while the boy swarmed up the oak (these Cape boys can climb like cats). Then he started crawling along a branch, axe in hand. It was not very high—perhaps thirty feet—but Rhodes turned off and said with a shudder, “I’m going inside, I can’t stand it—but it’s worth doing. There’s a man’s life on it.” He came out again later and said: “ You must give him a sovereign— 1902] PUBLIC SPEAKING 35 he risked his life.” (I gave him a shilling, with which he was quite pleased.) * Rhodes was no eloquent speaker, nor did he pour out flowers of rhetoric. He adopted an ordinary conversational style, and, as he used to say, “ took his audience into his confidence.” But he made his points, and so emphasized them one by one that any one who had listened to him came away with a distinct and clear idea of what he intended to convey, as if one were the only auditor. It has been said of certain great speakers that one listened to their flowers of oratory spellbound, and then wondered what they had been saying, and only realized when reading reports of the speeches after- wards. While one listened with as much attention to Rhodes, one at once grasped his arguments. His faculty for handling a hostile audience was marvellous. He never prepared his speeches really—except that he would write down a few notes, and for a few hours before speaking he would either go and lie down or sit wrapped in thought—probably running over points to put to his audience. His speeches were characterized by conciseness and simplicity of style. In his conversational manner he would proceed to explain a position and what he considered the remedy to be applied. 1 The ‘‘ Cape boy” or Africander or brown man, as he calls himself, is the coloured offspring of a European and the Hottentot or Malay, and is common to garrison towns. He is of all shades, from dark brown toa mere tinge, and dislikes being called a nigger. Many are the results of intercourse between the earlier settlers and their Mozambique or Malay slaves, and in most cases they have adopted the patronymics of the families to whom they owe their origin. 36 THE MAN RHODES [cH. 11 It gave one the impression of a schoolmaster giving a friendly discourse to a class of students ; and while he often created amusement by his air of an assumption of total ignorance of his subject on the part of his audience, which he proposed to remedy, his simplicity obviated any possibility of giving offence. . While he avoided dull platitudes, he often came out with remarks of obvious truth, which he delivered with an air of conveying startling new facts to his listeners. He was fond of chaffing people about him in a boyish manner, especially his “young men,” and he often exercised his powers of sarcasm on them, but he disliked anything in the way of risqué sayings and double-entendre, though he would on occasion come out with a good full-mouthed oath. He was by no means insensible to flattery, and the references made in his hearing to his resem- blance to Ceasar and Napoleon did not displease him ; and he also had his little vanities. He was obsessed by the thought of living after death in the country named after him, in his epigrams and especially in work, and he highly appreciated the idea of the enduring character of work as compared with the transient nature or ephemeral state of life. The passage in which Marcus Aurelius dwells ,upon this subject he had marked in his pocket _ edition of “ Marcus Aurelius.” He never told me, as Jourdan says he told him, to keep notes of what _Was going on around, but in 1898 he asked me to fetch a copy of a telegram he had sent to Lord 1898] LORD KITCHENER’S WIRE 37 Kitchener after Atbara, and when I produced it he asked for Lord Kitchener’s wire, which read, as far as I remember, “ Have smashed the Mahdi—F rank wounded but all right—if you don’t hurry up I shall be through before you.” Then he returned me the papers, and said, ‘“‘ You should keep things like that together, Le Sueur ; you will write things after my death, and that is something worth remem- bering.” There was a friendly sort of rivalry between him and Lord Kitchener as to which was making most progress—Kitchener from the north and Rhodes from the south. Just before the opening of the railway to Bulawayo, Kitchener was very short of engines for the Soudan Railway, and Rhodes, al- though he badly needed them, gave up to him two or three of the engines built for the Bechuanaland railway-line. Without them the railway could not possibly have been pushed on that year. Not long before Rhodes died he was asked to cable a message to be read at a dinner which was given to the C.I.V. heroes lately returned to London from the Boer War. After drafting and re-drafting a message several times, he cabled, as far as I can recollect : “Your record shows that Englishmen, although engaged in commercial pursuits, can still hold their own in the field.” I think the message, which is of course a reference to Napoleon’s famous gibe at the “ nation of shop-keepers,” fell rather flat. I have known him, too, at table make an epigram- matic remark, and watch for the effect on his listeners, and if they did not seem to be sufficiently attending he would repeat it until satisfied that 38 THE MAN RHODES [CH. III he had driven it home and that it would be remembered. He did not care about discussing religion—by which I mean dogmas or creeds—though I have heard him arguing with a Jesuit Father and others. I always looked upon him more as an Agnostic than anything else, but he did speak of his religion as being an effort for the betterment of mankind, and his “unifaith” might be said to consist in framing one’s life for the betterment of one’s fellow- beings. I have heard him make the remark, “ The man who says there is no God is a fool,” and in referring to Jesus Christ he always spoke of “ our Saviour.” At Barkly West, in 1898, a religious argument was started in his presence, and after listening awhile he said, “‘ Let aman bea Buddhist, let him be a Mohammedan, let him be a Christian or what you will; let him call himself what he likes, but if he does not believe in a Supreme Being he is no man—he is no better than a dog.” Rhodes had great sympathy with the Salva- tion Army work, and often expressed his admira- tion of “General” Booth as an organiser. “A wonderful man,” he termed him. He considered that the Army was doing great work in the cause of humanity, and he was always ready to assist it. With the unobtrusive and beneficent work of the Sisters of Nazareth he was in great sympathy, and the collecting sisters were frequent visitors at Groote Schuur. He appreciated the fact that the sisters and nuns of the House of Nazareth were 1897] SUPPORT TO MISSIONS 39 carrying on great works of charity in South Africa, as well as in other parts of the world, while the services they rendered during the Kimberley siege in the cause to which their lives are devoted can- not be overestimated. . The Society of Jesus also received the highest encouragement from him. In Rhodesia a large grant of land near Salisbury was made to the Jesuit Fathers. On this the mission station, Chishawasha, is established, and here the more or less thankless work of training the raw native is conducted. The mission is well equipped and has schools of various industries. Fruit-growing, the manufacture of oil, etc., is carried on. The fathers and brothers even make a very palatable wine from the grapes grown by themselves. It is customary in Rhodesia, ‘or South Africa generally for the matter of that, to scoff at the work of missions and instinctively to distrust mission-trained natives, generally with very good reason. It is commonly conceded that a “boy ” does not learn to steal until he has come into contact with a missionary; nor a girl im- morality until she adopts European clothes—in fact, her morality is judged in inverse ratio to the amount of clothing she wears; but although the ordinary mission “boy” is almost invariably im- pudent to a white man—the result of the “man and brother” doctrine—it is a well-known fact that the Chishawasha “boys” are never wanting in respect, until, on leaving the mission, they have it driven out of them by the low-class whites. Although at Chishawasha they are not instilled 40 THE MAN RHODES [cH. m1 with the doctrine held by the Boers, that their perpetual fate is to be hewers of wood and drawers of water to the whites, they are taught respect for their masters, and the Fathers try to imbue them with a sense of the dignity of labour, and endeavour to qualify them as more or less useful members of a community, by instilling into them as much knowledge of a useful trade as it is possible for their defective intellects to take in. Rhodes seldom or never bore malice, but there was one man whose memory he always reviled, and that was a certain member of H. M. Stanley’s expedition. Rhodes had obtained a concession along the western shore of Lake Tanganyika, which is now Congo Free State territory, and the precious document was despatched by native runners to the coast. The runners fell in with Stanley’s party, and the man referred to, who was said to have been acting as agent for the Congo Free State, took the concession from them and destroyed it. In referring to the incident afterwards, Rhodes said, “ But for the blackguardism of one man I should have been right through Africa ; but he got his deserts ; the natives killed him with a poisoned arrow.” The strip, which connects British East Africa and Uganda, has lately been the subject of negotia- tions with the Belgian Government. Rhodes was always imbued with intense patriot- ism and pride in being an Englishman, and once wrote down in his commonplace book: “ Ask any man what nationality he would prefer to be, and 1897] PRIDE OF RACE 41 ninety-nine out of a hundred will tell you that they would prefer to be Englishmen.” * In one of his speeches he retailed an interview he had had with Borckenhagen, a German, editor of the ‘‘ Free State Express” and a staunch National- ist. Borckenhagen, Rhodes stated, said to him, “Mr. Rhodes, we must combine.” Rhodes replied, “JT quite agree with you.” “Just one thing,” Borckenhagen went on: “we must have our own flag.” Rhodes said he answered: “Then I am not with you. If you take my flag, you take everything. You must think me either a knave or a fool. I should be a fool to give up my flag and my traditions, and I should be a knave because I should be despised by my own countrymen and distrusted by yours.” The whole of this conversation was afterwards denied by Borckenhagen. Rhodes was not overcome with awe or shyness when he came to face the Great Ones of the earth. The story is well known of his interview in con- nection with the Transcontinental Telegraph with the German Emperor, who admired Rhodes very much, and for whom Rhodes in turn had enormous admiration. ‘They had been conversing for quite a long time, the Kaiser being much interested, when Rhodes glanced at a clock and got up, and, instead of waiting to be dismissed, as Court etiquette demanded, he held out his hand to the Emperor, to the latter's amusement, and said, 1 Earl Grey said of him that while they had their differences of opinion, he could testify that he had “‘ never met any man who was Mr. Rhodes’s superior in either magnanimity or real genuine patriotism.” 42 THE MAN RHODES {cH. m1 “ Well, good-bye: I’ve got to go now, as I have some people coming to dinner.” While he was staying at Sandringham, he wrote down the following, as far as I can remember it. I don’t know its origin, but always thought it was something his late Majesty, King Edward VIL., then Prince of Wales, said to him: “ You and I have much in common... . You have many instincts—Religion, Love, Ambition, Money-making (which from your point of view I consider the best)—but if you differ from me, go and work for that instinct you deem best.” When he visited the Sultan of Turkey, from whom he managed to get permission to take some Angora goats (rams) out of the country, the exportation being otherwise prohibited, he arrived at the hour of his appointment for the interview with his overcoat on and buttoned up. Fearful of allowing him into the Presence with an overcoat on, under which he might have concealed firearms, bombs, and daggers, the gentlemen-in-waiting smilingly advanced to relieve him of it; but Rhodes sturdily refused to remove his overcoat, for the very good reason that he only had an ordinary lounge suit on underneath—hardly the dress in which to be presented to royalty. The attendants implored him to remove the overcoat, assuring him that it was impossible for him to be admitted unless he did so. “All right,” said Rhodes, “ then I won’t go in at all.” This would never do, and the attendants, seeing that further effort was useless, escorted him into the Presence of the Unspeakable One. 1897] CONSIDERATE FEELING 43 Rhodes was very considerate, and hated hurting any one’s feelings, though he very often did so “ in the course of business.” When I first joined him and we left Kimberley by train for the north, he and his party had just come from a function at the Kimberley Club, and had on starched white shirts and collars, while I had a soft collarless one. I felt rather awkward, and I remarked that I was the only one in the party in flannels. In a minute or two Rhodes, probably thinking I was uncomfortable, went to his compartment, from which he presently emerged, having discarded his starched shirt and collar and donned soft ones like mine. He showed this trait, too, once while we were camped on the veld. His servant, Antonyde la Cruz, was a strange mixture of Chinaman, Portuguese, and Cape boy, and while he was standing near us we saw a man coming up. I said he was a nigger, Rhodes a white man. As he neared us, I saw that he was an off-coloured Cape boy, and there- fore, according to South African ideas, as much a nigger as an aboriginal native. I said, “‘ There you are—a nigger right cnpaghd re ““Of course he’s not,” said Rhodes. “ He’s a white man, sunburnt like Tony.” Then, when Tony was out of hearing, he said, “Didn't you see Tony standing by?” However, Tony might be excused for considering himself a white man, as many of the so-called Portuguese and Goanese, who are darker than the majority of Cape boys, consider themselves Europeans and white men. A favourite Rhodesian pleasing fancy is to address these gentry in kitchen kafir. It can 44 THE MAN RHODES [CH. 111 never be said of Rhodes that he ever deserted a friend or failed to reward service rendered him. «We must do something for So and So,” he would remark. “let us make him a director of De Beers.” Captain Penfold, with whom he formed and maintained a strong friendship from the day when he first went to the Cape Parliament, and Sir Thomas Fuller, who had been long politically associated with him, he made directors of De Beers. Sir Graham Bower, who had been Imperial Secretary under Sir Hercules Robinson at the time of the Raid, and who had fallen into more or less disfavour, he offered employment under the Char- tered Company, but Sir Graham preferred to rely upon the Colonial Office and Rhodes’s and Lord Grey’s influence with them than to arouse comment by taking an appointment under the Chartered Company. Sir Lewis Michell, who for many years attended to all his financial affairs, was, immediately after Rhodes’s death, appointed chairman of De Beers, and later on went to London as a Director on the Board of the Chartered Company. Rhodes had no fear of being accused of nepotism in making his appointments either. When Gardner Williams resigned his position as general manager of De Beers, he told Rhodes that he did not like te recommend his son as his successor, simply because he was his son ; but Rhodes said, “ What on earth does that matter? If a man is fit for the post, it doesn’t matter tuppence what personal interest there is in it.” He was rather grumbled at for employing so many American engineers, but he calmly replied 1897] FACULTY OF CREATION 45 that his experience was that they were the only engineers who understood the work required of them. “If you want a man for a position, you want some one who understands the work.” Thus the majority of the engineers in De Beers’ employ and even on the Rand were Americans. Rhodes used to say that the greatest of all life’s pleasures was the faculty of creation. The man who had the genius of creation he regarded as the man who could contemplate his handiwork with the greatest satisfaction. ‘“ Itis a thing of my own creation: creative genius, that’s what I’ve got. It is a great thing to have,” he said. He would speak of having “created” the mountain view behind Groote Schuur, by cutting away the thick bush which hid it, or of having “created” Groote Schuur itself as a pleasure-resort for the public, and he regarded it with satisfaction as his own product, as the Almighty may have regarded the earth when “ He saw that it was good.” If Rhodes had any particular hobby it was farming. In Rhodesia he acquired two blocks of farms—one stretching along the Matoppos, where he built a large dam in the hope of growing winter crops by means of irrigation, as, the summer months being the rainy season, the advent of rust pre- vented wheat and oats being grown; and the other at Inyanga, which he hoped would be suitable for fruit, and where he intended utilizing as far as possible the old irrigation furrows which exist. These blocks of ground he purchased at high prices as an ordinary private individual. (This just to contradict a statement I have heard frequently 46 THE MAN RHODES [cH. I made that it was easy enough for Rhodes to equip farms cheaply, as he got the ground as a free grant from the Chartered Company.) In the Cape Colony, besides encouraging farming by giving valuable prizes at agricultural shows, he made De Beers purchase a number of farms near Kimberley, and imported a number of blood stock- horses and cattle. The horses included some Arabs from Mr. Wilfrid Blunt’s stock. The farms at Kimberley were under the charge of W. D. Fynn, and De Beers are constant prize-winners and exhibitors at shows. For the fruit-farms in the western province Rhodes had the advantage of the advice of H. E. V. Pickstone, a Californian fruit expert, and under his guidance the fruit-growing and jam manufacture has thriven. Rhodes also pur- chased a farm on the Cape flats, not far from Groote Schuur, on which he placed prize poultry and Yorkshire pigs, and where he also planted paddocks with grass seed from Queen’s own, Cape Colony, and the island of Madeira. This farm was not a success, however, and the stock was moved, and the place is now used as training stables for racehorses. In order to improve the strain of Angora goats in the Cape, Rhodes, as 1 have said, obtained from the Sultan of Turkey special permission to purchase and export some Angora rams. They were introduced to the Cape Colony and issued to the farmers at cost price ; but his action in importing them was condemned by the farmers’ associations, who deemed that the rams should have been selected by some one aware 1897] FAVOURITE BOOKS 47 of local conditions and acquainted with the strains which would be most suitable for introduction into the Cape flocks. Rhodes was an omnivorous reader. Like Macau- lay, he would throw himself down with half-a- dozen books and dip first into one and then another. Besides his favourite Gibbon, he read books of history with zest and also biography; while «Plutarch’s Lives” were a source of never-ending pleasure. Amongst other books that appealed to him were such as Bryce’s “ American Common- wealth,” Muilner’s “ England in Egypt,” and the works of Mahan on the Influence of Sea Power, while he now and again read some modern novel, a selection of which used to be sent out to him by Hatchards, of Piccadilly. He had a few of Thac- keray’s works and one or two of Dickens, but on somebody asking him once whether he ever read Dickens, he replied that he was “not interested in the class of people Dickens wrote about.” He had a large number of books on Federation and Con- stitutional Government, but they were usually on the shelves of the library. He once gave Miss Mary Brailsford a copy of R. L. Stevenson’s “ Treasure Island.” “ You ought to read it,” he said; “it’s a very good book—very instructive.” Have you read it, Mr. Rhodes?” she naively inquired. ‘Now you run away and play,” was Rhodes’s answer, turning and smiling at Brailsford. He did not care at all for poetry, nor did he read many novels, but he had nearly all Kipling’s works in his library; he was very fond of Rudyard Kipling, he said, because “ he writes such charming 48 THE MAN RHODES [cH. II letters.” He had the “ Woolsack,” built like Groote Schuur in old Dutch architecture, on the Groote Schuur estate, and Kipling spent a portion of each year there. Marcus Aurelius was a favourite of his, and he had a pocket edition, which he carried for many years, and the margins of the pages of which he had marked and covered with annotations. This was, however, missed after his death, and I don’t think it has been traced. One night at dinner he was discussing books with a certain “man of affairs” at Salisbury, and the latter recommended certain books to him, and said he would lend them to him. After dinner I walked home with him, and he handed me the three volumes, which he took from his shelves. On my return to Government House I found that the pages of none of the books had been cut ! He used to do little more than glance through newspapers, and of magazines his favourites were the “ Nineteenth Century,” “Contemporary,” and the “ North American Review,” though he nearly always read “South Africa” and “'The Spectator.” It will surprise many, even of his intimates, to hear that Rhodes kept a commonplace book, but its contents were nearly all quotations from Gibbon, and on the fly-leaf of one of his books he had written an epigrammatic remark, the purport of which I forget, but to which he added “not _ Gibbon, but the thought of another.” Rhodes was not actually an animal lover. He did not care much for horses or dogs, though he always had a favourite horse, and he would now 1898] HIS PORTRAITS 49 and then say he liked a particular dog. Perhaps the two he liked most were two superb collies given him by Panmure Gordon, and with one of which he was photographed at Iver. This he always regarded as his best photograph. He was always much taken with his portrait by Herkomer and with a small painting by the late Lady Romilly. A picture of himself was once sent to him in London by a lady who had painted it from a photograph taken at the laying of a foundation-stone at Port Elizabeth, and he was shown standing leaning on a spade. I showed him the painting, and he was delighted with it. “ Why, that’s me,” he said—* that’s my face exactly”; and he walked up and down the room with it and asked me to write and ask the lady who had painted it to call. There is one very characteristic photograph of him, of which he ordered a great number of copies. It was taken outside the De Beers car at Vryburg when we were there on our way north in 1897. Another very characteristic study of him is a water-colour done by Mortimer Menpes at Groote Schuur, where he depicted him in his white flannels on horseback. He was always averse to being photographed side-face, and when having his portrait taken in- sisted on facing the camera. While having a great financial brain, Rhodes was never really a speculator in shares, and although he was always anxious about the effect’ of his speeches, reports of his health, etc., on the market, when he required money to adjust his overdrafts he would sell a good stock like De 5 50 THE MAN RHODES [cH. 111 Beers or Goldfields, but not be influenced by the price of rotten stuff to make money. It has been often said that he did not understand money- making. If he did not understand its making, he superlatively comprehended the use of it. The conception of an idea and steps for its execution were almost simultaneous with him. When out riding, he would sometimes think of something, and ask me to remind him as soon as we returned home, but he never needed reminding, and immediately on our return he would start to give effect to his thought. He left things a great deal to the men he trusted, and he had full confidence in the men he employed. He would give his instructions, and there was an end of the matter; he expected them carried out, and no one was given a second chance who went to him with a tale of failure. “Women! of course I don’t hate women,” said Rhodes once; “I like them, but I don’t want them always fussing about.” Whether he liked women or not, he did prefer the society of men, although he was, as a rule, courteous and considerate to women ; but sometimes he would be brusque and unconventional. There were a few who were favourites of his, and he really enjoyed himself in their company. Then there is his well-known reply to Queen Victoria when she said she had heard that he was a woman-hater, and he an- swered, “ How could I possibly hate a sex to which your Majesty belongs!” No, Rhodes was no woman-hater, but he would not be fussed. He was, of course, much run after, 1897] WOMEN 51 especially in London, where one lady in particular seemed to spend most of her time in inveigling Rhodes into her carriage to drive him round the Park, proudly displaying to her friends this lion, captive to her spear and bow. She was about to buy a new carriage once, and her husband set his face dead against a victoria. Miss Edith Rhodes was present, and immediately said to him, “J know why you won’t have a victoria ; it is because when your wife goes out driving with my brother you have to sit on the little front seat like a footstool, and it is not very comfortable, is it ? There you are—1 knew I was right.” Before this gentlewoman’s marriage the man who is now her husband asked Rhodes to inter- cede for him, as his suit was not progressing very favourably. Rhodes used his power of persuasion, but for a long time the lady was obdurate, and wrote him a number of letters, the main purport of which was that she could not, could not, and would not marry his friend. But she did in the end, and the marriage is pronounced a very suitable and happy one. If she ever reads these lines, she may rest assured that her letters were seen only by Rhodes, and that they were destroyed by fire. On one occasion as we were riding, we passed two native women very scantily attired, and shortly afterwards he asked me abruptly how the sight appealed to me, and then, while I was mildly wondering what sort of reply he expected, he went on inconsequently, “You may ask why I never married, and do you know? I answer you very fairly that I have never yet seen the woman 52 THE MAN RHODES (cH. I whom I could get on in the same house with.” In spite of this there was one woman, a very charming daughter of a Cape family, whom he felt he could get on with, for he proposed to her several times. She was a very beautiful girl, and she afterwards married a soldier and became a great favourite in London society. There was another beautiful and distinguished woman whose carriage was often seen at the Old Burlington Street entrance of the Burlington Hotel, and she would wait for hours after I had told her Rhodes was in the city or out anywhere, and he would make his escape by the Cork Street entrance; nor do I think she once succeeded in catching him. He had two or three woman friends with whom he used to ride in the Park in the mornings, and he enjoyed their society. He had his own idea of female beauty. I recol- lect the first time I rode out to the Matoppos with him. We had not been at the huts for ten minutes when he said, ‘“‘ Now, Le Sueur, 1 want you to see my idea of a really beautiful native girl. You take him and show him, Huntley.” Harry Huntley and I rode off, and went to a kraal a short distance away, and the little lady came out to greet us. She was Lo Bengula’s youngest daughter, and Rhodes called her “the Princess.” She was a light copper-coloured and_pleasant- featured girl of sixteen or seventeen, with a beau- tiful figure, and was named “ N’tupusela,” which is the native name for the rosy hue in the East before daybreak. On board ship once the usual fancy-dress ball was held, and I had designed and drawn a dress 1902] “WHO'S THE BRIDE?” 53 representing ‘Cape to Cairo,” a picture of Table Bay and Mountains in water-colours at the bottom, and pictures representing the chief towns on the way to Cairo all the way up the skirt, all joined together with a string of telegraph-poles and wire in black. On the head was a fez, crescent, etc., and on one side of the bodice a portrait of Kitchener, and on the other one of Rhodes. Incidentally it took the first prize, but Rhodes knew nothing of it. We were seated at dinner when the young lady who wore it entered. Rhodes looked up as she passed our table, and then said, “ By Jove! that young woman has got my picture on her stomach.” Luckily she did not overhear the remark. On another voyage there was a dance on board, and I was sitting with Rhodes on deck when the dancers came up from the saloon. A young girl came up amongst them, who wore a little wreath of flowers in her hair. ‘“ Who's the bride?” in- quired Rhodes. ‘She isn’t a bride,” I answered. “Of course she is,” said he, “else why the devil has she got that thing in her hair?” nor would anything persuade him that she had not usurped some prerogative of a bride in her dress.) When we came out in 1902, there was a delightful family on board. There were two daughters, and Rhodes was very interested in the elder girl. “That,” he said to me, “is my ideal of a beautiful English girl. You must introduce me to her.” I asked him to be on deck just before dinner, and waited for him at the gangway entrance to the saloon with her. Presently he came along and 1 intro- 54 THE MAN RHODES [CH. 11 duced him. They spoke for a few minutes, and we went in to dinner. I don't know if he talked to her much afterwards, as he was not well, but he continually spoke of her admiringly. He had a Napoleonic habit of sometimes calling attention to a woman’s dress, and he would say things “that gave them to think.” When the Reformers were in gaol at Pretoria, they were visited by numbers of their lady friends, who brought them delicacies, flowers, etc. One used to be very marked in ministering to Colonel Frank Rhodes’s comfort. She used to come at least once a day to the gaol, if not oftener. She afterwards married and settled in Bulawayo; and one day she and her husband came out to spend a couple of days at Rhodes’s huts in the Matoppos. At dinner the first night Rhodes asked her all about herself, and she mentioned going to see Colonel Frank in gaol, and her maiden name. “Oh, yes,” said Rhodes, “ I know—you are the woman who wanted to marry my brother.” CHAPTER IV RHODES AS AN ORGANIZER RuHopeEs’s methods of organization may best be described as “thorough,” and thorough because he gave matters his undivided personal attention. Nothing more absurd about him was ever said than that he was “too big to consider details.” It might much more truly be said that he was big enough not to disregard the smallest detail, knowing full well how often neglect of a seemingly negligible point has wrecked many a project and caused the best-laid schemes to “ gang agley.” His immense power of concentration of thought enabled him at once to place his finger upon a weak spot, and it often lay in an apparently insignificant detail which a smaller man might overlook. The broad basis of a big idea might readily be conceived by a very ordinary brain, but require the application of a master mind to grasp its minutie and bring it to a successful issue. Although it sounds incredible, it has been authoritatively stated that Rhodes once, while personally conducting Khama, the Mangwato King, over Groote Schuur, pointed out his bed 65 56 RHODES AS AN ORGANIZER [cH. IV to the dusky chief and said, “ This is where I lie and think in continents.” The story has been told with bated breath as illustrating the greatness of Rhodes’s mind ; but to think in continents, or for the matter of that universes, might easily be quite a sound occupation for the mind or lack of it in the veriest “luny ” in Bedlam. . In Rhodes his big ideals were practicable, and he was capable of devising and applying the measures for their consummation. Where diffi- culties might appear unsurmountable to the many, the one loophole would be fixed upon by Rhodes. Any question with which Rhodes had to deal he examined from every point of view, and his . complete mastery of its details was the result of his thoroughly thrashing it out, and concentrating his mind upon it in the seclusion of his bedroom or the solitudes of the mountain-side. On a proposal being made to him he would often ask : “ Have you thought of so-and-so ?” and on receiving the reply that that aspect had not presented itself to the proposer, he would answer, throwing himself back in his chair with a grim smile, or springing to his feet, hands thrust into fobs : “Oh, I can see you getting into a hell of a mess”; then go on, “It’s quite obvious, . . .” or “It’s perfectly clear, ...” or “ Don’t you see, ete.?” and proceed to point out the lion in the path and the way to evade him. He nearly always, in private conversation, assumed that what was obvious to him must *anNHOg ALOOUL) LY $ y hooudag Ss SaaqoHy (9 1899] GRASP OF DETAIL 57 necessarily be manifest to any one else, who had probably not grasped the details. When the idea of amalgamating the diamond interests in Kimberley occurred to him, he set himself thoroughly to master everything connected with the industry. He knew the cost of labour, hauling, washing, sorting, etc., to the yield per load, as well as the prices of the different classes of rough stones, the expense of cutting and polishing, and the purchas- ing capacity of the public—and what is more, he carried these particulars in his head. He was in this way enabled to meet experts on their own ground—very often much to their surprise. When Jameson proposed marching on Bulawayo in 1898, Rhodes’s very wire to him, advising him to read Luke xiv. 31, was an injunction to Jameson thoroughly to go into details before venturing on a decisive step. His plans were well laid and prepared, and if they did now and then go wrong it certainly was not because he had neglected to give full considera- tion to the smallest point. His great error, of course, stands out strikingly in his under-estimate of the fighting strength of the Boers in 1899; but here he had little or nothing upon which to form an estimate, or else he was determined that, whatever the cost, war was inevitable. The Rhodes of 1899, moreover, was not the Rhodes of a very few years previous. Had he not been failing even then, he would not have been 58 RHODES AS AN ORGANIZER [cH. IV peevishly irritable to, and irritated by, Colonel Kekewich in Kimberley. In all his doings Rhodes believed in maintaining absolute secrecy until all danger of a check was past, and then he would talk quite freely and display his hand openly. However, taken all in all, the success of most of the schemes organized by Rhodes after their primary conception may be said to have been largely contributed to by the fact that he had thoroughly mastered their details and neglected none. A matter once taken in hand, Rhodes applied all his mind and energies to it, and was not diverted from his purpose by small obstacles which, as a rule, could be swept away. Where large ones intervened which he could not batter down he used the faculty he possessed for overcoming opposition by conciliation, and thus an irresistible force meeting an immovable body often resulted in its course being deviated—but the force went on. Rhodes had an absolute gift for concealing his real intent without making an actual misstate- ment, and he perfectly understood the art of temporizing. In his negotiations with Barney Barnato, where the latter apparently held the trump cards, although Rhodes had the backing of Lord Rothschild, Rhodes puzzled his Jewish adversary by suddenly pretending indifference, and then altering his role of buyer to that of seller; he exchanged mining claims for shares in Barnato’s 1883-4] “ CONCILIATORY METHODS” 59 company, thus obtaining a large holding in the Barnato properties (the Kimberley mine), and proceeded then to increase his holding of shares until he held a controlling interest. (N.B.—One wonders whether Barnato, at the time, thought that in purchasing the claims held by Rhodes, and giving shares in payment, he was buying Rhodes out.) . Rhodes’s axiom that “every man has his price” was vulgarly applied to his suggestion to “square the Mahdi,” which was freely criticized as a boast that the Mahdi could be bought off. It is morally certain that in saying that every man has his price, and that the Mahdi could be “squared,” Rhodes felt that he had proved the possibilities of “ conciliatory” methods, but then he had the personality, which he had frequently used to evolve order out of chaos—and this strong personality often stood him in good stead. In the Bechuanaland disturbance of 1883-4 his personality and conciliatory methods averted a catastrophe and appeal to arms. The natives were satisfied with the annexation and the protection promised them, while the Boer freebooters were left in undisturbed possession of the farms they had jumped and settled down contentedly. When Rhodesia was rushed by the Boers, under Ferreira, a conflict was avoided by the exercise of tact, and those who came with arms in their hands were content to come in under the Chartered Company’s rule, and to occupy the land allotted to them as peaceable settlers. 60 RHODES AS AN ORGANIZER [cH. IV Rhodes terminated the Matabele rebellion of 1896 by a talk to the rebel chiefs, earning the name of “the Separator of the Fighting Bulls,” and he brought them to a right frame of mind by “dealing ” with them just as he had dealt with the Pondos. Even in Cape politics he won his greatest victories by applying his methods of “ conciliation.” He “conciliated” the coloured voters in the Cape Colony by propounding and advocating the doctrine of “equal rights to every civilized man south of the Zambesi” (a deplorable necessity), and then in turn propitiated the Dutch wine farmers, who were opposed to his native franchise policy, by giving them an excise on their brandy, together with a heavy duty on imported spirits. While Rhodes’s methods, in short, were in the main forceful, he appreciated to the full his peculiar capacity for “ dealing with” men, and he was assisted in the latter by a certain savoir-faire, which frequently disarmed an opponent, especially when Rhodes “ took him into his confidence ! ” CHAPTER V RHODES AND THE CAPE AND POLITICS GENERALLY In 1880 Rhodes, then twenty-seven years of age, was elected one of the members of the Cape House of Assembly for Barkly West, and went to Cape Town to take his seat in the House to represent the Diamond Diggers. Although quite a young man, he was from the first looked on as a possible leader—at any rate, regarded as a strong man who would go far, and some day arrive, as the French say. It was not, however, until 1884 that he accomplished anything striking ; but his opportunity came when he saw his route to the north in danger of being blocked by the establishment of small Boer republics in the native territories of Bechuanaland. Affairs were somewhat uneventful after the Boer War of 1881, when, instead of the Boer power being crushed once and for all, a shameful peace was concluded. Then the Republics of Stellaland, Goshen, and Rooi Grond were established by freebooters from the Transvaal, who seized the land from the native Bechuana chiefs Mankoroane, Moshete, and Montsoia, and parcelled it out in farms; and 61 62 RHODES AND THE CAPE (cH. V here Rhodes first met and crossed swords with President Kruger. The Transvaal Government had declared these republics to be under its protection; but the loss of the territory to the British flag meant a serious thing to Rhodes’s schemes, as Bechuanaland shut him off from the north. Representations to the Imperial Govern- ment resulted in a missionary, Mr. John Mackenzie, aman of character and determination, being sent up as a British resident, and the invasion of the Boer filibusters was declared contrary to the Convention of London’; but the natives were informed that the British Government could not support them against freebooters! Yet in Feb- ruary 1884 the ground was proclaimed a British protectorate. Mr. Mackenzie was a negrophilist and much prejudiced against the Boers. He was determined to oust the Dutchmen, and proclaimed all the farms in the new republics the property of the British Government. The subsequent treatment meted out to Mr. Mackenzie has been held by many not alto- gether to redound to Rhodes’s credit. From Mackenzie’s first appointment Rhodes certainly did all he could to prejudice the High Commis- sioner, with whom he always had great influence, against him, and have himself sent up to replace him. It might have been highly expedient for Rhodes 1 The much-discussed Convention of London, 1881, under which the Transvaal Government was entrusted with the control of their internal affairs only, and the British suzerainty established over the South African Republic. 1884] TROUBLE IN BECHUANALAND 63 to be on the spot, but Mackenzie was deserving of more than an expression of want of confidence. His mistake possibly lay in declaring the farms the property of the Government and in attempt- ing to dispossess the Boers, who had occupied them, and replacing them by Britishers. He found it impossible to accomplish his aims without adequate force; but upon his requisition- ing for men he was recalled, and Rhodes later replaced him. The British Government stepped in, and deter- mined to despatch an expedition, under Sir Charles Warren, towards the end of 1884 to occupy Bechuanaland. In November 1884 a Cape Commission, con- sisting of the late Sir Thomas Upington, Prime Minister, the late Sir Gordon Sprigg, Treasurer, Mr. Stephanus Marais, M.L.A. (Paarl), with Mr. Sydney Cowper and R. W. Murray, proceeded to the disaffected area. They interviewed the chiefs Montsoia, Manko- roane and Moshete, whose territory had been invaded, and found both Moshete and Mankoroane determined to wait until Colonel Warren, in whom they had implicit confidence, came out; while Moshete was anxious to retain his independence and was averse to annexation either to the Trans- vaal or the Cape. It appeared that in August 1884 over a hundred of Montsoia’s people were killed by the Boers. Montsoia’s people had sown on land claimed by the Goshenites and were warned off. Some time after, the Boers being scattered, the natives burned 64 RHODES AND THE CAPE [cH. Vv portions of their dorp (village). The freebooters, then collected and fully armed, proceeded to reap what the natives had sown (also evidently to loot, as they brought in some 8,000 head of cattle and sheep). They were attacked by 150 natives, under Christopher Bethell, an Englishman. The natives were repulsed and 103 killed. On the following day seven natives went out to search for wounded, and these, with nine wounded, were also despatched —total, 119. Bethell himself was wounded in the eye, and his brains were subsequently blown out by one of the Boers The freebooters declared that the advent of Imperial troops would mean a general rising of the Dutch-born population, while the Stellalanders were in favour of annexation by the Cape Colony. The Commission did not effect much, though a conference of Cape Ministers decided on annexa- tion to the Cape, and matters did not proceed further towards a settlement until the arrival of Sir Charles Warren’s expedition. This expedition was accompanied by Rhodes, and a peaceful occu- pation was effected, while a complete settlement was come to early in 1885, after a meeting with the late President, Paul Kruger. (This was Rhodes’s first meeting with Paul Kruger, although Sir Joseph Robinson has said that he first introduced the two men in 1886, when a meeting was held on the subject of gold titles on the Rand.) Rhodes strongly objected to Mackenzie being present at the interview, and he had a disagreement 1884] THE SETTLEMENT 65 with Sir Charles Warren as to the terms of the settlement, Rhodes wishing to give the Boer filibusters title to the farms they had settled on and Sir Charles supporting Mackenzie in his wish to supersede them with British settlers. Rhodes, as usual, had his way. The territory was annexed as British Bechuana- land, and in 1893 ceded to the Cape Colony with its border at Mafeking. After the Warren ex- pedition, Rhodes returned to the Cape through the ~ Transvaal, and for the next few years busied himself with preparations for northern expansion. About now the Cape Government again urged the annexation of Damaraland, which had been pressed on the British Government since 1867, and which is now German South-West Africa—perhaps the most highly mineralized part of Africa. The Imperial Government was, however, apathetic. Rhodes was included in Sir Thomas Scanlen’s Ministry of 1884 as Treasurer-General and then Minister without portfolio. Although the political situation at the Cape was, of course, always of great importance to Rhodes if he were to have an untrammelled hand in push- ing his northern policy, it was just as important to him to safeguard the huge interests of De Beers, as he relied upon their funds to further his schemes. The diamond industry, moreover, depended upon control of the market, and in order to obtain this control indiscriminate dealings in diamonds had to be suppressed. ‘To this end the Illicit Diamond Buyers Acts were brought into being. Under these Acts the ordinary criminal procedure 6 66 RHODES AND THE CAPE [cH. V is practically reversed, and instead of an accused person being innocent until he is proved guilty, the onus of proof of his innocence is thrown upon him. The operation of the Act necessitated the trapping system, which inevitably opens the door to num- berless abuses, which were—at all events, in the old days—freely practised, and in consequence of which many a perfectly innocent man has undergone long periods of imprisonment owing to his inability to establish his innocence when circumstantial facts were against him. Many of these were scape- goats who were paid to endure the punishment which should otherwise have been borne by their employers; many of them on liberation were repudiated by their employers, and, having no remedy, contented themselves with attempts to blackmail and bombarding their deceivers with threats. The late Barney Barnato received shoals of letters from men who opined that he had reaped the benefit of their incarceration, and they drove him to a state of nervousness bordering on frenzy. . These letters, which contained dire threats, were rudely embroidered with skull and cross-bones and coffins, etc. He was known during the last months of his life to leave his bed in the early hours of the morning in his pyjamas, and, barefooted, walk a mile and more to the house of a friend for protec- tion from imaginary pursuers, crying out, “ They’re after me; they’re after me!” No wonder that he drank freely, and finally ended his life in a frenzied attempt to escape from the supposed vengeance of one of his victims. 1888] THE ILD.B. ACTS 67 If a man had a grievance against another, and wished to “ put him away,” all he had to do was to secrete a stone about the other’s person or drop it into his tobacco-pouch and then give information. The victim was searched, the stone found, and as he was unable to account for his possession of the stone, he would be convicted and sentenced to anything from two to ten years’ hard labour. The penalty was twenty years’ hard labour under the later Act. The I.D.B. Act was looked on as an iniquitous piece of legislation—however necessary in the interests of the diamond industry—and its un- popularity was proved a few years ago when a Kimberley diamond-broker was charged on a number of counts (nineteen I think in all) with infringing the Act. Knowing that an unprejudiced jury would not be obtained in Kimberley, he was tried in Cape Town, and the case was apparently clearly proved. The judge summed up dead against the accused, but the jury, after retiring, brought in a verdict of “not guilty” on all the counts, the verdict being received with applause in a packed court. The judge was speechless at first, and then addressed the jury, saying that he had told them in as clear words as he could employ that the man was guilty, and he left it to them to reconcile their verdict with their consciences. In the whole course of many years’ experience on the bench he said he had never heard a more dis- graceful verdict. Then turning to the accused, he said curtly, ‘“‘ The jury says you are not guilty ; you may go.” 68 RHODES AND THE CAPE [cH. v De Beers always had a certain number of nominees in the House of Assembly. The Diamond Diggings were almost wholly represented by members interested in De Beers, while their funds were freely used to support candidates in other constituencies. Grants for schools, athletic grounds, etc., were freely made, prizes offered at agricul- tural shows, and there were few doubtful con- stituencies where a glimpse of the long purse of De Beers was not obtained. The Namaqualand copper-fields and railway were developed by De Beers while Francis Oats (a director) and Rhodes contested the seats in 1898 ; the latter stood at the same time for Barkly West, and on his election for both places decided in favour of his old constituency, and his place for Namaqualand was taken by Sir Pieter Faure, a staunch friend. Stellenbosch, Wellington, and Paarl were all strong Bond' strongholds. In 1897 and 1898 Rhodes, through his agents, commenced buying fruit-farms in these districts from their Bond owners, with a view to settling men on them about whose politics there could be no question. The former owners were furious when they discovered who the actual purchaser of the farms was. They were repeatedly warned from the pulpits of the Dutch Reformed Church that De Beers were buying the land, and they were begged not to sell. Rhodes made himself responsible for one-third of the purchase price and settlement of the farms and De Beers for one-third, while Alfred ' Afrikander Bond—the South African Nationalist Association. 1898] DE BEERS 69 Beit put up the other third. The farms were, of course, a good commercial investment, but a lot of money was spent on them, and they were extravagantly handled. I believe that they are now, however, giving a return, and the fruit, jam, and preserves, etc., from “ Rhodes’s fruit-farms ” are seen everywhere. It was hoped that the votes of the employees at the De Beers dynamite factory in the Stellen- bosch Division would assist to win seats for that district from the Bond. The factory was erected at the cost of about a million, and here, too, a lot of expense was incurred in buildings which were on the style of architecture of Groote Schuur and furnished with solid teak, It was a great disappointment to find, however, when the first election came along, that only a quota of the employees who had been placed on the voters’ roll remained, the rest having been got rid of in some mysterious way or removed to Kimberley, and the cause was divined only when it was dis- covered that one of the principal overseers was a rank Bondsman! Rhodes argued that De Beers took an enormous amount of money out of the Cape Colony, and should therefore be made to pay for it; but it was rather a horse of another colour when it was proposed to impose a direct tax upon diamonds. He also submitted to his co-directors that the diamond mines could not last for ever, and that De Beers should invest in other enterprises which would outlast the mining industry. Needless to say, Rhodes had no difficulty in making the 10 RHODES AND THE CAPE [cH. Vv directors at Kimberley (the local board) see eye to eye with him—he said it was to be so an so, and so it was—but he experienced considerable opposition to his methods from some of the . directors on the London Board, notably F. S. Philipson-Stow, formerly a life governor; he, in 1897, moved a resolution at a meeting of directors in London to the effect that the Board of Directors should not launch the Company upon a political campaign in South Africa or elsewhere and appropriate its funds to carry out that object in the manner proposed. He more particularly objected to the way in which the expenditure of considerable funds was entrusted to an individual director with political ambition (Rhodes, of course) and who wished to gratify that ambition under the pretext of promoting the welfare of the share- holders in mining ventures in distant parts of Africa away from the Company’s centre of action, and in metals or ores with which the Company had hitherto had nothing to do and for which there was no real foundation nor necessity. In the past, he said, when it was thought expedient to promote the candidature of any member of the Company for Parliamentary honours, the funds—so far as he was concerned—were subscribed by the other members of the Board privately, and no attempt was made to convert the Company into a political machine. Should it, he added, again be thought necessary to give similar support to members of the Board or political candidates having the Company’s interest at heart, who could not afford to defray the expenses of a contested election, 1890] MINISTRY OF 1890 71 he was prepared, as formerly, to subscribe his quota thereto. Lord Rothschild, too, at this time, on behalf of the French shareholders, lodged a protest against the use of De Beers’ funds for any purpose other than the ordinary business of De Beers. “Our business,” he said, “is to get diamonds, and we are not a philanthropic association.” He objected chiefly to the school grants. In spite of this, Rhodes went merrily on devoting the funds to what purpose he pleased, and when he met the London Board made himself so unpleasant that they were glad to approve of his actions. In 1890, when Rhodes formed his Ministry of himself, Merriman, Sauer, Sivewright, Rose-Innes, and P. H. Faure, he was certainly diffident about accepting office, as he felt that his real work lay in the north. Then, again, there was a large number of members on each side of the House who did not like the idea of his having absolute power in the north and his being at the same time Premier of the Cape, not to speak of his chairmanship of De Beers. He was associated with the Bond, who had practically put him into power, and at the same time his work in the north gained him the sympathy of the rest of the House. There was no opposition to speak of; but in view of Rhodes’s association with the Bond, the Pro- gressive Association was formed, of which Sir T. E. Fuller was chairman. It became a sort of local Imperial Association to watch and guard against the ascendancy of the Bond, whose domination over Rhodes they feared. Later their functions 72 RHODES AND THE CAPE [cH. V became more those of an electioneering committee of the whole party, and it formed the nucleus of the Imperial Party which put Jameson into power. It had no backbone to speak of when it first started, but after Rhodes’s fall and he became e natura their leader, it was a very differentparty, containing such men as Sir Edgar Walton, Sir Thomas Smartt, and Sir Henry Juta. Rhodes certainly gave cause for alarm, as he would pretend he did not care a damn about the Cape Colony and was quite content with his north, which, he said, was quite independent of Cape ports and Cape railways in view of his railway from Beira; he even spoke of a union being formed in the north and the Cape left to its own devices. This from the Premier was rather disconcerting, and he therefore gave an under- taking that nothing he did would be incompatible with his dual position as Premier and managing director of the B.S.A. Company, and the thought that he had broken faith in that matter in connec- tion with the Raid caused him more distress than perhaps anything, although Mr. Joseph Chamber- lain found it incumbent on him to say later that Rhodes’s personal honour was not affected. The Bond was virtually in power under Rhodes’s Premiership, though he chose his ministers as he pleased. The Bond was not strong enough to take office, and the late Hon. J. H. Hofmeyr simply sat on the back benches and pulled the strings for the Bond Party, and preferred to work with Rhodes. They were the two ablest heads in South Africa, and they were at one on a 1893] A CAPE UNIVERSITY 73 university scheme for the Cape—in fact, Rhodes was always at one with him gua education. John Hofmeyr (“ Onze Jan”) had great ideas and great ideals, and his pet idea was the estab- lishment of a great South African university, which is now, under union, in a fair way to materialize. Hofmeyr favoured his own old college at Stellenbosch as the chief centre of South African learning. In 1893 Merriman, Sauer, Rose-Innes, and Sir James Sivewright resigned their portfolios on account of Sivewright having given to a personal friend, J. D. Logan, the contract for refreshment- rooms on the Cape Government railways without calling for tenders; and Rhodes reconstructed his Cabinet. The new Ministry was composed of himself as Prime Minister and Secretary for Native Affairs; Sir Gordon Sprigg, Treasurer-General ; W. P. Schreiner, Attorney-General; Sir John Frost, Secretary for Agriculture ; and John Laing, Secretary for Public Works and Railways. Before forming this Ministry, Rhodes approached the Chief Justice, Sir Henry (now Baron) de Villiers and inquired whether the latter was prepared to take the Premiership and form a ministry. They had one or two interviews, and Sir Henry expressed his willingness to undertake the task, submitted the names of his proposed ministers, and wrote that he would call on a Sunday morning. He called, but Rhodes was not in. He wrote next morning, and called again, only to be again disappointed. ‘The next day the names 74 RHODES AND THE CAPE [cH. V of the new Cabinet were gazetted, with Rhodes himself as Prime Minister. He never intended that any one but he should form a Cabinet, but merely wished to get the Chief Justice’s ideas and discover what colleagues he would select ! As to the Afrikander Bond, this was inaugurated about 1885, and its objects summarized were the preservation of South Africa as a solid nation under its own flag. Although the Bond leaders later declared that the true purpose of the association was the pre- servation of South Africa as a solid nation as an integral part of the British Empire, it was, after all, an association founded on the racial basis, as its very name implies, and it became a very dan- gerous instrument in the hands of unscrupulous poli- ticians as soon as parties divided on racial lines—in fact, its existence tended to defeat the very objects towards which its leaders declared it was working. Its official language was the Taal, its organ the Dutch newspaper, “ Ons Land” (Our Country), and its head J. H. Hofmeyr (‘ Onze Jan ”). The fact that certain branches of the Bond expressed open rebellion during the Boer War, however, must not in itself condemn the whole Bond on an accusation of disloyalty. When German Wilhelm congratulated Kruger in his famous telegram on repelling Jameson, and applied to the Portuguese to allow German marines to land at Delagoa Bay, “Ons Land” severely took him to task and informed him, in unmeasured terms, that German interference was not required nor sought in South Africa. 1893] THE GLEN GREY ACT 15 Rhodes and Sir Thomas Smartt were both members of the Bond at one time. The Bond members found it necessary to make strong protestations of loyalty during the War, and in reply to an address at Worcester Lord Milner said, “ Loyal? Of course you are loyal. It would be most monstrous were you not loyal !” Rhodes’s Glen Grey Act was perhaps one of - his finest pieces of legislation—the first frank at- tempt to deal with the problem of native labour, and is a real effort to make the natives work, or, in his words, “to recognize the dignity of labour.” One of the features of the Act, and perhaps the most important, is the allotment of land to natives under individual title, and is admirably adapted to fulfil its purpose—z.e. to make the native work. Under the Act all able- bodied natives not owning allotments of land had to pay an annual tax, provided they were not in bona-fide employment. I think very little was collected in the form of this tax, as those not on allotments did not seek local employment to earn the amount of the tax, but were recruited for work on the Rand. ‘The labour clause in the Act Rhodes termed a “ gentle stimulus.” By the principle of giving land to each family of natives, under individual title, the men have their own land, and they have to improve that land, and the land having been so allotted a large number have to go out and work, because for some there would be no land at all. Whether the application of such means meets with the approval of the “faddist of Exeter Hall” or not 76 RHODES AND THE CAPE [CH. V is beside the question, but from the point of view of the man who, like Rhodes, wants to make the native work, this legislation is highly efficient, and mayhap the day is not far distant when its application to all the native territories and native reservations will bring about a solution of the native-labour difficulty, and consequently of many others by which we are beset. It is now generally accepted that under the federation towards which Rhodes was trying to steer public inclination his policy was to secure “ Equal rights for all civilized men south of the Zambesi.” As a matter of fact, when Rhodes used the phrase he employed the words “ Equal rights for every whzte man south of the Zambesi,” and so he was correctly reported in “ The Eastern Province Herald.” A copy of the paper was immediately sent to him by the South African Political Association,’ and he was _ significantly asked whether he was correctly reported. It must be remembered that it was on the eve of a general election, and the coloured vote in the Western Province is no inconsiderable one, while the natives of Tembuland and Aliwal North practically control those constituencies ; and Rhodes therefore posted back the paper, on the margin of which he wrote: “ My Motto is— “ Equal Rights for every civilized man south of the Zambezi. « What is a civilized man? A man, whether ' An organization of the coloured voters of Cape Colony. In Cape Colony, as in Rhodesia, colour is no bar to the granting of the franchise to natives who otherwise possess the necessary qualifications. 1893] DELAGOA BAY 717 white or black, who has sufficient education to write his name—has some property or works. In fact, is not a loafer.” Between 1891 and 1893 Rhodes made an attempt to acquire Delagoa Bay, the Portuguese port which is the natural port for the ‘Transvaal, as Beira is for Rhodesia. The bay might have been purchased for a song at one time, but the opportunity was lost. Rhodes, acting in conjunction with Sir James Sivewright, and supported by Lord Rothschild, reopened negotiations with the Portuguese Government in Lisbon through Baron Merck, and that Govern- ment was prepared to consider a proposal for purchase of the bay, Portugal’s finances being in a very low state. The negotiations were very near succeeding in 1898, the sum of £1,300,000 (the price asked by Portugal) having been offered, when a new bidder appeared in the field, surmised to be J. B. (Sir Joseph) Robinson, probably acting on behalf of the South African Republic. The Government at Lisbon, with the usual procrastina- tion of the Portuguese, now began to shilly-shally, and eventually Baron Merck withdrew from the ne- gotiations in disgust. The whole fact of the matter seems to be that the Government were always will- ing to sell not only the port, but the whole of the colony if they could, but were deterred by fear of the people. The ordinary Portuguese is proud of his country’s former glory and history of its conquests oversea, to which the existence of the colonies is witness, and the common people, albeit they know that there is not a “milrei” (3s. 4d.) 78 RHODES AND THE CAPE [cH. Vv in the Treasury, would be averse to parting with an acre of land in the colonies won by Diaz and d’Albu- querque, and the Government probably feared a revolution on consenting to sell Delagoa Bay.’ The Portuguese East African possessions, as well as their affairs in India and the East, are under the administration at Goa, and all matters are submitted to Lisbon through Goa. On Colonel Machado taking office at Goa he was, in a short term, much incensed at what he considered most unjust treatment accorded to Portugal : 1. In respect to merchandise transhipped at Bombay for Goa, on which import duties were levied by the Government of India, notwith- standing that no duties were levied on goods going through Goanese territory to the Southern Mahratta country ; and 2. In respect of prohibitive rates charged by the South Mahratta Railway over the bit of line con- necting their trunk-line with the West of India Portuguese Guaranteed Railway, in order that goods which would naturally find their outlet at Goa should be sent over their long haul to Bombay. He felt that these Portuguese goods should be treated as if they were bonded at Bombay and not taxed by the Government of India, and he urged upon his Government a policy of retalia- tion against England both in Indian and African ports. Apart from Indian considerations the matter was of great importance (1) in the interests of ‘To the common people of Portugal the names of Bartholomew Diaz, Tristan d’Acunha, and Alphonso d’ Albuquerque are what Drake’s, Frobisher’s, and Hawkins’s are to British. 1897] DELAGOA BAY 19 Rhodesia, and (2) in view of the position at Delagoa Bay. The Customs Treaty between the Indian Government and Portugal came to an end in 1892, and was not renewed; but in 1897 it was proposed that to meet the difficulties negotiations for a new customs union be opened, and it was suggested to the Foreign Office that in addition the British Government might give Portugal substantial financial assistance without cost to England by guaranteeing the capital of the West Indian Portuguese Railway, amounting to £1,350,000 at 24 per cent. Portugal was paying £73,000 per annum on £1,150,000, being at the rate of 5 and 6 per cent., while, if guaranteed by Great Britain, they would pay 24 per cent. on £1,350,000, or £33,750, a saving of £39,250 per annum. The security of the guarantee was to be the customs receipts at Goa, payments for salt under the treaty, and the revenues of Portugal itself to make up any deficit. This, it was hoped, would allay the feeling of irritation felt by the Portuguese Government and cement Great Britain’s friendship, which appeared desirable in view of the early expected announcement of the Berne award in regard to Delagoa Bay.’ A similar policy was proposed in regard to Delagoa Bay—the British to guarantee the sum required to meet the Berne award and the con- struction of harbour works at Delagoa Bay up to 1 This was an adjudication on the claims of the Macmurdo family, who demanded compensation for the forcible seizure by Portugal of Macmurdo’s railway, and the result of the arbitration was expected in 1897. 80 RHODES AND THE CAPE [cH. v a maximum of £38,500,000 at 24 per cent., thus saving the Portuguese Government, without cost to England, £122,500 per annum—the difference between 24 per cent. and 6 per cent. which the Portuguese Government would probably have to pay. In this case also the revenue of the railway, the customs, and the harbour receipts would be hypothecated to the service of the debt. In addition, conditions would be imposed which would practically secure for England the administrative position at Lorengo Marques. It was also suggested that a customs union for the East Indies and South Africa should be at once arranged on the lines of the treaty between India and Portugal of 1879, which worked in India with such satisfactory results. Such, then, were the proposals before the Foreign Office in 1897, resulting merely in the modus vivendi as pre- liminary treaty ; though it is possible that with the advent of union of the southern states a three- cornered customs union on the lines shadowed may be established. An enormous amount of British and South African capital is invested in Lorenco Marques in wharfage, piers, and in vacant land abutting on the railway premises and line. In 1894 Rhodes “dealt with” the Pondos, over whom Sigcau, the paramount chief, was ‘losing control. The Pondos are the most cruel of South African tribes, and most superstitious, and there- fore most wtch-doctor-ridden. They probably alone in South Africa understand torture as a fine art. Rhodes visited Sigcau, and with very little 1895] LOSS OF POLITICAL FRIENDS 81 trouble the territory was settled and annexed to the Cape Colony. After the Raid general topsy-turvydom existed amongst the members of the Cape Parliament, except that the solid phalanx of the Bond openly sympathized with Kruger, with the inevitable result that the House divided on racial lines. Schreiner (who did not stand again for Barkly West, but for Malmesbury) and Merriman led the Bond, and the Raid was referred to as a filibustering expedition even by Merriman, who evidently forgot that when the Mashonaland pioneers got to Mount Hampden he wired to Rhodes to turn them loose on the Portuguese Pungwe before the Germans anticipated him. After 1895 Rhodes felt keenly the loss of the intimacy of a great many men who had been friends and who had been at one with him in many of his ideas, such as J. H. Hofmeyr, whose ambition for a great teaching university so much accorded with Rhodes’s own ideas. Hofmeyr and others kept very aloof, and Rhodes continually taunted him with remaining behind the scenes and pulling the strings, instead of coming out into the open. He referred to him as the “mole of Camp Street,” a name bestowed on him by Merriman, ~ who said that one knew by the molehills that he had been in the vicinity, but one did not see the damage done by him beneath the surface. Merriman did not at all like Rhodes giving him away as the originator of the nickname. It was different with W. P. Schreiner, as Rhodes often asked why Schreiner did not come and 7 82 RHODES AND THE CAPE [cH. V see him and meet him on a social if not political basis. As to the Progressive Party, on Rhodes’s return after the Raid Commission he became at once the leader of the party. Their leaders were not very stiff in the backbone, and many were poor-hearted from Rhodes’s standpoint, and must have roused in him feelings akin to what he possessed in regard to those of his countrymen whom he credited with “unctuous rectitude.” The positive childishness of the objection of the Party led by Sir T. Fuller and Arthur Douglass to Jameson as a member of the House before he had repented in sackcloth and ashes, must have aroused his ire, and he never spoke more truly than when he said the party needed him and not he them. Jameson, in deference to their wishes, did not stand for Port Elizabeth in 1898, but for Kimberley in 1900, when he referred to them as “not very sturdy, but very prominent Progressives.” Had it not been for Rhodes, it is doubtful whether they would have been a party at all, and whether Sir Gordon Sprigg would have again occupied the Treasury Bench. After the general election of 1898, when Rhodes was again returned for Barkly West with James Hill, Sir Gordon Sprigg formed a ministry which included Rose-Innes as Attorney-General. Rhodes was consulted as to the selection of Rose-Innes, and he laconically replied that he would “swallow a mugwump if it would help the Governor.” Although Rhodes always had the idea of a federation of the South African states and , 1902] SUSPENSION OF THE CONSTITUTION 83 colonies before him, no practical steps towards a federation or union were taken during his lifetime. His aim, moreover, was a federation and not a union in the form which has since been established, and it is doubtful whether he would have pledged Rhodesia to enter a union constituted as it is. However, with him it was merely a cherished ideal, and in its consummation he had no part. The last active political agitation at the Cape that Rhodes engineered was the proposed tem- porary suspension of the Constitution, during which order might be restored out of: the chaos that existed owing to the war. It was impossible for the Cape Government to restore order, as apart from the question of finance many of the members of the Cape Parliament were in sympathy with the Republican forces, and thousands of their constituents were in open rebellion. The steps taken by the Cape Government to repress rebellion were hopelessly ineffective, and a mass of debt was being piled up. The only remedy appeared to be the handing over of affairs to the Imperial Government until peace and order were restored, and it was hoped that a readjustment of constituencies could be made under a new Constitution. In 1902 Rhodes was lying ill at Muizenberg, Sir Gordon Sprigg being Prime Minister. The Bond was then in a majority, but while the war continued did not attempt to turn the Progres- sives out. 84 RHODES AND THE CAPE [cH. Vv The idea of a temporary suspension of the Constitution originated with Lord Milner, the High Commissioner, but Joseph Orpen wrote to Rhodes and strongly advocated a petition being presented to create an interregnum, during which matters might be so readjusted as to secure fairer representation for the towns and ports, which were in the main progressive, and a curtailment of the back-veld’ Boer, who was ruling the country, although representing a minority. Rhodes enthusiastically embraced the idea, and a petition was drafted and signed by all the members of the Progressive Party, excepting the members of the Ministry. Sir Gordon Sprigg was approached, but he refused to sign, as did the other ministers, with the exception of Dr. Smartt, who immediately resigned his portfolio and was replaced by Arthur Douglass. Sir Gordon repeated Pitt’s utterance, “I know that I am able to save the country and that no one else can.” This state- ment was received with a certain amount of hilarity. Failing to get the signatures of a majority of the members of the House, the petition was shelved, but one result was to take the leadership out of Sir Gordon Sprigg’s hands and place it in Dr. Jameson’s. One of the effects was curious, as one afternoon in the House of Assembly a resolu- tion was moved by one of the Progressives, and on the Speaker putting the question the “ Ayes” outshouted the “ Noes,” and a division was called for—whereupon ensued the ridiculous spectacle of 1 Back-veld—isolated country ; cf. Australia, “ back-block.” 1902] AN UNALTERED PURPOSE 85 the Prime Minister, with his four ministers, leaving his own party and solemnly crossing the floor, amid roars of laughter, to vote with the Opposition against the motion proposed by one of his own party! This effort to secure a temporary suspen- sion of the Constitution was long made use of by the Bond Party and held up to constituencies as an attempt to interfere with sacred constitutional rights with about as much fairness as the lies disseminated by the Liberals at Home anent the cruelties practised on Chinamen at the Rand. It was hoped at one time, and in fact expected by many, that Rhodes would contest a constituency in the Imperial Parliament in the Unionist cause ; and it is quite probable that had his physical strength held and his presence not been so neces- sary to South Africa, as it was after 1895, he would have sought a seat in the House of Commons, where he would have had greater scope for further- ing his main idea of a United Empire. ~e From the time that he made the remarkable will leaving his wealth for the extension of the British Empire, his purpose never altered—to devote his life to the construction of a world- wide Empire, whose scattered portions should be closely knit by common ties of sentiment and mutual interest. But as affairs eventuated he had to devote himself to the smaller task of working first for the federation of the colonies and states of South Africa, the completion of which he did not even live to see. While he was a Unionist in politics (Unionism he regarded as synonymous with Imperialism), for the con- 86 RHODES AND THE CAPE [CH. Vv summation of his ideal of a Federated Empire he considered that a form of Home Rule was necessary in Ireland. He regarded a settlement with Ireland as the key of the federal system—a step towards perfect Home Rule for every part of the Empire, but—‘“with control from Westminster.” It was by Rochfort Maguire and Swift MacNeill that a meeting was arranged between Parnell and Rhodes, when the latter and the late W. KE. Gladstone were at one gua the latter’s Home Rule policy. Rhodes saw that a form of Home Rule in Ireland could be used as a stepping-stone to Imperial federation, and he had discussed the matter with Gladstone, who was favourably impressed by Rhodes’s arguments on his idea for an Imperial council or parliament at Westminster in which the colonies would have representation. It was a step towards the welding into a united whole of the different units of the Empire. Ireland he was regarding as one of the units—a separate dominion, as Canada and Australia are to-day. Treland was to have its parliament, but subject to control from Westminster, as are the parliaments of the ,Over-Sea Dominions—practically respon- sible government for Ireland. Parnell gave Rhodes his views, and declared that he could come to terms with Gladstone, and Rhodes certainly dissuaded him from the policy of disruption. Rhodes then made a subscription of £10,000 to the funds of the Irish Party, money being badly needed if the agitation in favour of Home Rule was to be continued. Parnell promised to refrain from violent speeches and exhortations, but in 1893] IRISH HOME RULE 87 every way in his power to bring his followers to reasonable consideration of their proposed representation. The Irish Nationalist leader, however, not long afterwards made an exceedingly bitter speech, and exhorted the Nationalists to “use any means” to attain their object. He justified an appeal to arms, and preached the Jesuitical doctrine of the end justifying the means. Later on, however, he apologized to Rhodes, and said he had spoken in the heat of the moment and without thinking. The Imperial Parliament, through the Secretary of State for the Colonies, has to-day the right of veto, seldom it is true exercised, over the laws passed by colonial legislatures, and the Imperial Parliament certainly can frame legislation binding the colonies ; but in practice this Imperial control over local executives without representation is deemed impossible. The difference as to Ireland was that it is part of the United Kingdom, and the Over-Sea Dominions would only really be incorporated in the Union of Empire upon their obtaining representation in the Imperial Parlia- ment. The federation Rhodes had in view would start with Ireland, already a part of the United Kingdom, as the first of the dominions which would afterwards form the units of a larger world- wide union, and which would gradually be incor- porated therein. But for the purpose of this federation he deemed it necessary that Ireland should revert to the position she might have held had she never become a portion of the United Kingdom, and she would have her responsible 88 RHODES AND THE CAPE [cH. Vv parliament and executive under control of the Imperial Parliament at Westminster, in which she was to have representation, as the other Over-Sea Dominions were to have as they qualified for admission into the Imperial Federation. Another subscription for political purposes, and incidentally also for the purpose of furthering the scheme of Imperial federation, was made by Rhodes, and that was a gift of £5,000 to the funds of the Liberal Party through Schnadhorst. A rumour was afterwards circulated that Rhodes had “ bought” the Liberal Party, and in a speech Campbell-Bannerman stigmatized the statement that Rhodes had contributed to the funds of the party as “a lie.” The correspondence was then published, proving that the gift had been made and that the condition upon which it was granted was that the policy of the party should not be to “scuttle out of Egypt.” The abandonment of Egypt meant everything to Rhodes’s trans- continental schemes, and he was afraid of the withdrawal from Egypt, just as the Liberal Party, under Gladstone’s leadership, had weakly con- cluded a dishonourable peace with the Boers in 1881, and dealt the death-blow to South African Britishers’ belief in the faith of English statesmen. In making this donation to the funds of the Liberal Party, he also stipulated that any scheme of Home Rule for Ireland should include repre- sentation at Westminster. Otherwise, as he brusquely said, he “wanted his money back.” He had unspeakable contempt for the Nonconformist Radical, whom he credited with “unctuous recti- 1897] COLONIAL MANUFACTURES 89 tude,” and he had good reason to be apprehensive, having in mind : 1. The refusal to annex Damaraland, which, as German South-West Africa, is turning out one of the most highly mineralized areas in Africa, besides being a superb cattle country, some 300,000 square miles in extent. 2. The surrender to the Boers in 1881. 3. How nearly Bechuanaland was absorbed by the Transvaal in 1883-4. Had Kruger been allowed peaceful possession of Bechuanaland the way to the north was blocked, and in a very short while Matabeleland and Mashonaland (now Rhodesia) would have been Transvaal territory. 4. The sacrifice of Charles Gordon at Khartoum and the seriously suggested evacuation of Egypt and Uganda. 5. The assistance refused to Sir Harry Johnston in Central Africa, which, but for Rhodes, would have resulted in the loss of British Central Africa and probably Uganda. While Rhodes never said much on the subject of Tariff Reform, as it did not enter much into the scope of his work, he held that any scheme of reform should include colonial preference, and maintained that a system of reciprocity would do much to further inter-dominion trade. He was not greatly in favour of the establishment of colonial industries, at all events in South Africa, especially of what he called ‘“ bastard industries ” -—the manufacture from locally produced raw material of articles which are manufactured in the United Kingdom for export. He rather favoured 90 RHODES AND THE CAPE [CH. Vv the increase of production in the colonies of the raw material which would be exported to England and exchanged for the manufactured article. He said that every blanket made in the Cape Colony meant less work for the factory hands in Yorkshire. One industry he seriously hoped to establish in South Africa, however, was diamond-cutting. He did think that it was absurd that diamonds should have to be sent to Holland for cutting, but I do not think he ever took any active steps to establish the industry in South Africa. As to a successor to Rhodes in South Africa, there was only one Rhodes, and his shoes cannot be filled. Sir Starr Jameson has the loyal support of the Imperialists at the Cape and throughout the Union, but he does not fill the place Rhodes occupied. Sir Abe Bailey had at one time an idea that he was destined to succeed Rhodes, and in many ways he reminded one of him. He contested and won Rhodes’s old seat (Barkly West), and purchased the house at Muizenberg that Rhodes had com- menced to build but left unfinished. | He became one of the Progressive Whips, but on the formation of the Jameson Ministry he resigned his seat and returned to the Transvaal, and an amusing story is told of his meeting with Sammie Marks there. « Aha,” the latter is reported to have said, “ my dear Abe: it may be a very natural idea to you that the mantle of Rhodes has descended upon your shoulders, but I, having had some experience of second-hand clothing, candidly tell you the mantle won’t fit.” CHAPTER VI RHODES AND THE PUBLIC In Rhodesia Rhodes was looked upon as “the Father of the People,” to whom every one brought his or her troubles in the sure hope of relief of some sort. Did any one want a start in business or in farming, did he require a span of oxen or a disc plough, had he lost his cattle through disease, his crops through locusts, he usually complacently waited until he could get at ‘the Old Man.” “Wait until the Old Man comes,” was the balm administered to the wounded spirit. Ifa man had a grievance against the Chartered Company, the railway, there was always a final appeal to Cesar. Jourdan says that in Rhodesia Rhodes was as- sailed constantly by a “crowd of beggars.” I prefer not to employ the word, which is hardly applicable to the Rhodesian of those days. They were not beggars in the ordinary sense of the term. Those who appealed to him were in the main men who had fought for the country, had settled there, and usually had real grievances in the shape of cattle, crops, and goods lost during the Rebellion, by insufficient police protection, or deemed that they had received inadequate compensation from the Chartered Com- 91 92 RHODES AND THE PUBLIC [CH. VI pany. Certainly there were numerous others who made for Rhodes on the off-chance of getting something—anything—but these were easily dealt with. It was seldom, however, that a man paid Rhodes an altogether disinterested visit, and he naturally dropped into his well-known habit of greeting a visitor with, “ Well, and what do you want?” On one occasion at Bulawayo one of his brothers called on him and was greeted with, “ And what do you want?” “None of your damned money, anyway!” was the sturdy reply. “ Well,” replied Rhodes, turning away, “it is the first time in your life that you didn’t.” On some occasions he would, however, become stubborn and refuse to listen to anybody. One case in particular occurs to my mind of a woman who came to see him in Bulawayo, and said that she and her husband, who was ill, were stranded and starving, since they had been brought up by some man to start a business under misrepresentation. The woman completely broke down, but Rhodes would not do anything for them, and marched out of the room. I felt that it was a genuine case, and gave her £40 out of my own pocket, and they are to-day conducting a flourishing business in Bulawayo. Rhodes came in to me a few days later, and said, “I hope you did something for that poor woman the other day?” I told him what I had done, and he immediately wrote out a cheque for the amount. Rhodes, as a rule, lent a ready ear to applicants for assistance, and during the period from the middle of June to the end of October, 1897, I estimated that he had spent in assisting people money at 1897] INDISCRIMINATE PHILANTHROPY 93 the rate of £100 a day; then there must be taken into account the aid he gave to the weaker vessels who were stranded and helped to get out of the country. He took a personal interest in the work indi- viduals were carrying on in various parts of Rho- desia, and any man who was likely to make a good settler always received every encouragement from him. He often provided men with the funds needed to go off on a holiday. There was one such case where a Dutchman got a cheque from him to go down country for a change, and he went to Kimberley, but did not return. Some time afterwards he went to Rhodes in Kimberley in distress and asked for assistance. Rhodes, having had a talk to him, said, “ You left my country and never went back, and yet come and ask me for help”; then, turning to Jourdan, he went on, “I don’t think it is a deserving case, but for his damned cheek tell Pickering (secretary of De Beers) to send him £100.” He was, as all rich men are, inundated with begging letters from all parts of the world. A young woman would write for a sum of money to get married on, a man would ask for a lump sum for the naive reason that he had never possessed so much in his life (nor was likely to), and wanted to experience the sensation. Applications for appoint- ments in scores ; and the wastepaper-basket fondly embraced copies of thousands of testimonials, avouching their owners to be possessed of every qualification and virtue on earth, excepting, perhaps, 94 RHODES AND THE PUBLIC [CH. VI modesty. When in England, nearly every friend or acquaintance had a young man in whom he was interested, who wanted to go to Rhodesia, and these were usually disposed of by being sent out to the tender mercies of the Regimental Sergeant- Major of the B.S.A. Police. Many of these carried out personal letters from Mr. Rhodes some- thing as follows: “ DEAR—— “T send you So-and-so. He is a good cricketer and ought to make a good policeman. ...” Rhodes was often sadly at fault in selecting his subjects for assistance, and his secretary for the time being would make all inquiries he could about the probable recipient of a cheque, and recommend “the case” or not according to the information he gathered. In one instance at Salisbury he was applied to for a span of oxen by a young Boer who had settled in the country, he having lost his cattle by rinderpest. Jack Grimmer and I made inquiries, and ascertained that the man had never possessed any cattle ; and we strongly urged Rhodes to give him nothing. Rhodes, however, preferred using his own judgment, and the Boer went off with a cheque for £400. ‘The next day there was a race meeting; and during the afternoon Grimmer and I, to our huge delight, found the man, lying dead drunk under a wagon. We got Rhodes to walk round past the wagon, and Grimmer then pointed him out, saying, “'There’s your £400 Dutchman.” 1898] APPLICATIONS FOR ASSISTANCE 95 Rhodes didn’t say a word, but hurried off and never mentioned the matter again. With their usual diplomacy, letters for assistance from Dutchmen nearly always contained the excuse that they or their friends were anxious to trek to Rhodesia; others, more illiterate, were masses of fulsome flattery. The following are very fair specimens of hundreds of similar communications. I preserve the original spelling and punctuation, omitting only the names and addresses : . . . TRANSVAAL. Januwary 8.1.98 My Larp Mr. C. Ruopes, Der Sir, ‘ Jas a few lins to ask u far hilp as ther is sovel fammars in the Transvaal hu wantet to come up to Maussonnu Land, but dey ar a bit short of monney the most of them ar all my fammely and frinds so tha ask me to ask Mr Rhodes fo some monney to come up witch if ican get it there wil be now les then 70 to 80 fammelys hu will come at wance if tha con git some monney tha ask me to right them all a bout the country and so i did and now tha ar all made to come at wance affer tha got my letter and rood to me to try Mr Rhodes for monney thay wel return it a gane to Mr Rhodes as soune is tha got salel done so if Mr Rhodes con help witch monney i shall bring them in as fammars tha should not trowbil but tha all hat and harvey lost witch the catel sick nes hope on return Yours struly the Peple wel bevery tank foul to Mr Rhodes if u con hulp them so welli. My adras... ee 96 RHODES AND THE PUBLIC [CH. VI Care CoLony 25.1.98 Tue HonouraBLeE C. J. RHODES Dear Sir, The drought and rinderpest have made a poor man of me. This time last year I was well off in cattle but now out of a big drove of cattle I have but five oxen left and 2 cows and as I have heard that you are very generous and rich I thought I would ask you to help me till I can get on my feet again. I am an agriculturist no crop this season hard up. If you could lend me from £50 to £100 fifty to one Hundred pounds for a year it would set me up as I wish to trek to Matabele- land as soon as possible and have not oxen enough. Where is the best part for Agriculture. Hoping you will not refuse me this small favour (small to you) I remain Yours respectfully, P.S. Please send money as quickly as possible and oblige. He was constantly being asked to be godfather, and as a consent was almost invariably sent the number of his godchildren must be legion. These requests came not only from Britishers, but Boers as well, from all parts of South Africa. A budding author on one occasion wrote to Rhodes and informed him that he intended including him as one of the characters in a novel he was writing, and sent him a copy of some pages of dialogue, and he asked for Rhodes’s approval of the words he put into his mouth. He added a 1898] STRAY LETTERS 97 postscript to the effect that it was immaterial if Rhodes disapproved, as he intended publishing the work as it was in any case. The waste- paper-basket could tell the rest of the tale; but whether the novel ever saw the light of day I cannot tell. A young Oxford undergraduate used to write to him—mainly about doings at Oxford; but Rhodes tired of these letters after a while, as he did of the letters of a girl who regularly wrote to him, though he read her first with interest. She never gave any name or address, and she simply wrote bright, chatty letters which she said she sent for the mere pleasure of doing so. It was only natural that Rhodes should come to look upon a gift of money as in all cases an . acceptable reward for services rendered, and the means of recompense to be in his cheque-book. He never expected any one to do anything for nothing. One man, however, a Mr. Roos, had done some little extra work for him while he was Prime Minister, and to him Rhodes sent a cheque for £10. Roos, however, returned the cheque, saying that what he had done was not for the sake of money. Rhodes’s correspondence was naturally volu- minous, as, in addition to his political work, even when out of office, he was Managing Director of the B.S.A. Company, Managing Director and Chairman of De Beers and of the Consolidated Gold Fields, and of the Mashonaland and Bechuana- land Railways and the African Trans-Continental Telegraph Company. Then there were the affairs 8 98 RHODES AND THE PUBLIC [cH. V1 of his various farms and all manner of private correspondence. I don’t suppose he saw one-tenth of the corre- spondence addressed to him. His secretary opened everything, no matter how “private” or ‘“ con- fidential”” they were marked. Letters would often arrive marked “Strictly private—for Mr. Rhodes alone,” or “ Not to be opened by the secretary,” but these were all dealt with with the others. His correspondence was bulky, but reduced to surprisingly small dimensions when it reached him. A number of letters went straight to the waste- paper-basket ; others I answered straight off, and a few were given to him as opportunity occurred. Some of these he would write short replies to himself, and the others were either not replied to at all or else he would dictate answers—either by telegram or by letter. Of those letters which I thought should be shown to him, I used to keep a list with a précis of the contents, so that he could glance over it in a minimum of time. Often the sender of a letter would complain, on meeting him, that he had received no reply to his letter, and Rhodes would nonchalantly say, “Oh, I don’t remember having seen it. My secretary probably never showed it to me.” A reply was probably not sent for very good reasons, but in this way the secretary earned many a hard word and angry look. Sometimes he has sent a carefully worded telegram in my name and not his own when a little temporization was necessary ; and when matters were settled, if things had not gone quite smoothly, he would disclaim all 1898] HIS CORRESPONDENCE 99 knowledge of the telegram, and promptly blow me up for acting on my own responsibility. He had a habit, too, of hiding away letters ; but he often put them away so safely that he could not find them again. For instance, he would put a letter in a book in the library or in a vase in the drawing- room. Not long before his death he received an important letter from the High Commissioner, which he put in a jar in the library, and there was a great search for it after his death. The major portion of his important letters or telegrams were dealt with by wire, and he would dictate telegram after telegram. He was quite easy to follow in longhand, although he used to say his secretary should know shorthand. Jourdan and Palk were, I think, the only ones who knew it. As to letters, he wrote more or less as he spoke, and used to dash off short notes. When a letter was taken down word for word as he dictated it, it was full of tautology and redundancies, especi- ally if he wanted to emphasize a point. When dictating a letter or memorandum, he would walk up and down, his hands clasped behind his back or stuck inside his trousers, and he would wander into the next room, or even beyond, and one would have to strain one’s ears to catch what he was saying. Personally, I never attempted to take down his actual words, but made notes of what he was saying, and then wrote the letter, or whatever it was. The dictation of a letter often took him much longer than it should take the ordinary man, as it was all repetition. Having got the main points, I used to sit and pretend to take notes, just 100 RHODES AND THE PUBLIC [cH. vI saying, “ Yes, sir,” when he asked “ Have you got that?” After dictating a long jumble, in which he repeated himself over and over again, he would say, “Now read that.” I would reply that I would write it out first, and 1 must say that he very seldom made any correction. If he did, it was merely to add a postscript in which he repeated half of what he had already said, and sometimes made the postscript longer than the letter itself. On one occasion, in 1901, he dictated a letter to me while he was still in bed, and then said, “ Now read that.” I had only taken a few notes, and smilingly said, “ I must go and put it into decent English first.” He just gave his little whine and rolled over in bed. I brought him the letter later on, and he said, “I think that will do. That will do very well.” I heard him speak of it a day or two after, and he said, “ Le Sueur says I can’t write English.” All his private letters were written by hand and many official ones. He never had a typewriter in his house. The bulk of his official correspondence was done in the offices of the Chartered Company and De Beers, and for this typewriters were used. When on the veld, we were often away from post- offices for weeks at a time, and then a mail would turn up—a muid ' sack crammed with letters ; or on reaching a telegraph-station a mass of telegrams, some of them pages in length, would be handed tome. TI have known him receive a big batch of telegrams, and, after reading them over two or three times, retire to his wagonette, or wherever ' Wheat measure. Three bushels go to the muid. 1898] POWERS OF MEMORY 101 he was sleeping, and early in the morning start dictating replies, and, without looking at the wires again, answer every point in every one of them, without missing one. He had a wonderful memory— especially for figures. For instance, he would receive a state- ment of his holdings from Messrs. Wernher, Beit & Co., and run through a list of a hundred or so stocks, then correct it. ‘* No, this is wrong,” he’d say; “I have only 3,090 of these, not 3,890—So- and-so had 300,” and so on with every stock on the list. CHAPTER VII RHOBES AND THE NORTH Tue first step towards the acquisition of the north may be called the formation of the Rudd-Rhodes Syndicate, as it was known. Alfred Beit was a member of it, and Messrs. Rudd, Rochfort Maguire, and F. R. (“Matabele”) Thompson were appointed delegates to obtain a concession from Lo Bengula, son of “ Umaziligazi,”’ king of the Matabele. Umaziligazi was a pure Zulu, and was driven out of Zululand by Tshaka, the uncle of Cetywayo, who was the father of Dinizulu. He made his way with his impis (regiments) through the Marico District of the Transvaal, having several encounters with the Boers, to Bechuanaland, where he soundly hammered Khama, beloved of missionaries and tea-drinking old ladies and so on, to what is now Bulawayo.” From here he started raiding east and west and south and north—south and west as far as Palapye (Khama’s Town), south and east as far as Gazaland (Gungunhana), Manicaland and Umtali (M’tasa’s), and north as far as the Zambesi. 1 Called by the Boers Moselikatze, and meaning “the Trail of Blood.” ? Gubulawayo—* the Place of Slaughter.” 102 1888] AN ILL-FATED IMPI 103 - A large impi was sent to the Zambesi River and Victoria Falls under Babyan, an induna (chief), who was an envoy to the late Queen Victoria and a great favourite of Rhodes’s. The impi reached the river, and the local tribes offered to ferry them across. Some they conveyed to the opposite shore, but the majority were landed on the islands, the canoes returning for others. When the larger portion of the impi had been left on the islands, the canoes drew off, the Matabele being abandoned to their fate. Numbers were drowned, died of - starvation, or were devoured by crocodiles, and only a small remnant returned to Bulawayo. Those who reached the northern bank of the river founded the Angoni nation, who still exhibit some traces of their warlike descent. The women and girls captured in the Matabele raids were taken as wives by the Matabele warriors, but for many years Lo Bengula was very strict as to intermarriage. For instance, the Kumalo (Umziligazi’s patronymic) were of royal blood, and could only marry in the Kumalo class or with the king’s consent. Then the Abenthla, or descendants of the true Zulus and Swazis, could only marry in their own class; and after these came the Amaholi, or slaves, who were also divided into three classes. Umazili- gazi was succeeded by his son, Lo Bengula, and the territory under his sway was enormous. He ruled his people with an iron hand, and his name was feared from the Limpopo to the Zambesi. Whilst he dealt out death with an _ unsparing hand, only one white man is known to have been 104 RHODES AND THE NORTH [cH. VII killed by his orders, although there was quite a iumber at various times at Bulawayo—such as Colenbrander, Sam Edwards, Selous, Fairbairn, and Dawson. Lo Bengula was once asked why he punished every offence with death, and he replied, “ What else am I to do? They understand death, and I can’t lock them up as you white people do in gaols. 1 have no gaols, nor the trouble of looking after them.” The Matabele nation settled in the territory now known as Matabeleland, which had_ its boundary at the Shangani River, and was governed by Lo Bengula through indunas, who had districts placed under their jurisdiction. Mashonaland was under tribute to Lo Bengula, but the inhabitants were not members of the Matabele nation, and the territory was really only a happy hunting-ground for Matabele raiders. There was no one ruler in Mashonaland, but a number of tribes, each under a small chief. Tribes are found a few miles apart, having distinct customs, manners, and language. Months were spent at Bulawayo by Rudd, Maguire, and “ Matabele” "Thompson “ bongaing ” to Lo Bengula, from whom they finally obtained a concession for the mineral rights over the whole of his dominions, with the exception of the Tati Concession—a tract south of Bulawayo, dividing the territories of Lo Bengula and Khama. The young Matabele warriors got rather im- patient of the prolonged stay of the concession- hunters, and “ Matabele” Thompson, on his return 1888] MATABELE CONCESSIONS 105 journey, had to fly for his life, and nearly perished of thirst. In November 1888 the British South Africa Company was incorporated by Royal Charter, and preparations were made for an expedition of occupation. In May 1890 the Mashonaland expe- dition started under the guidance of F. C. Selous, and effected a peaceful occupation of Mashona- land, and erected their fort on the kopje over- looking the present town of Salisbury. The township of Victoria was established near the Zimbabye ruins, and for a time was the most important centre. Other concessions, such as those granted by Lo Bengula to A. E. Maund, Renny-Tailyour, and Edward Lippert were purchased for what they were worth. The most important of these was perhaps the concession granted in November 1891 to Lippert, which conferred on the concessionaire for the term of one hundred years the sole and exclusive right of laying out, granting, or leasing farms, townships, building-plots, ete.; in fact, surface rights generally. The document conveys no right of transfer, but the concession was purchased by the British South . _ Africa Company. While the company was purchasing every northern concession which seemed to have the shadow of genuineness, a concession in Gazaland was offered to Rhodes for £20,000. He offered £10,000 in cash for it, but the owner refused this, and Rhodes gave him a week in which to make up his mind. The concessionaire 106 RHODES AND THE NORTH [CH. VII then went off, and hawked the concession, but met with no buyers. He then, after the lapse of a fortnight, returned to Rhodes, and said he was prepared to accept £15,000 for his concession. “What concession ?” asked Rhodes. “The one you offered me £10,000 for,” he replied. “I know of no offer,” answered Rhodes. «« Why,” the concessionaire said, “‘you gave me until a week ago to decide.” « Ah, yes,” Rhodes replied, “but that was a week ago. Now I am not a buyer.” “Well, you may have it for £5,000,” went on the disappointed man. “No, no,” Rhodes said, “ I don’t want it. Good afternoon.” A concession was also obtained from M’tasa, the most important chief in Manicaland, who had his kraal on a big mountain near where Umtali now stands. Half a mile from the mountain it is impossible to see a hut, so hidden are they amongst the rocks, yet M’tasa a few years ago paid hut-tax on over four hundred huts. The whole of Manicaland was claimed by the Portuguese, and in 1890 Forbes, with a few police on a visit to M’tasa’s kraal, found there a Portu- guese force under Baron de Rezende, the com- mandant at Macequece. Accompanying him were a Portuguese, d’Andrade, and a Goanese, Gouveia. Forbes arrested the trio, Baron de Rezende 1891] KRUGER AND GERMANY 107 being sent back to Macequece and the two others to Cape Town. A commission was later on appointed to de- limit the boundary, and under its award the border was fixed at Umtali, all the low country falling to the Portuguese, and the highlands, in- cluding M’tasa, being included in the territory of the British South Africa Company. A great deal has been written and said about an intrigue between Kruger and Germany in con- nection with northern expansion, and it has been stated that when the concession was obtained from Lo Bengula envoys sent by Kruger and /Leyds were actually on their way up to Bulawayo; but Kruger always gave this an emphatic denial, his words being, “Ik vertrouw de Engelsche min maar ik vertrouw de Deutzers tien maal minder” (“I trust the English but little, but I trust the Germans ten times less”). Lo Bengula had, how- ever, been visited by an envoy from Kruger, and a German also started for Bulawayo, but never reached the kraal. ‘The expedition, having reached Salisbury, now metaphorically beat their swords into, not plough- shares, but picks and shovels for prospecting, as the discovery of gold was the first object of all. The land was, however, apportioned out in farms, and after the column came a number with the intention of settling down. Of such was Laurence van der Byl, who brought up about eighteen young South Africans, and settled on Laurence- dale, between Salisbury and Umtali. His grave now marks the spot, and although the land is 108 _ RHODES AND THE NORTH [cH. vII being farmed I do not think that any of his party remain in Rhodesia. In 1891 the late Lord Randolph Churchill made a tour of the country, and wrote some glowing articles on its possibilities. With Rhodes, on his first visit to the country that now bears his name, were two Dutch farmers, members of the Bond and of the House of Assembly of the Cape—Messrs. De Waal and Venter. De Waal afterwards “ratted ” from the Bond and followed Rhodes. He stuck closely to Rhodes, but when the latter was dying, and De Waal was unable to see him because he was too ill, he was very much annoyed, and said to me that Rhodes had promised him a number of Charter shares which he never got, and added that had he known “the way in which he was going to be treated he would better have known how to act.” I-think he exemplified what Rhodes meant when he referred to my countrymen “and the eye to the main chance.” It was on his trip with De Waal that Rhodes shot the only thing in the way of big game he ever did, 7.e. a quagga (zebra), and he afterwards said he hated himself for having shot it, and would never shoot another. He used to tell a story, too, which De Waal repeats in his book, of having early one morning walked in his pyjamas a short distance into the veld, and a lion suddenly roaring close beside him. He immediately fled for his life, and came panting up to the wagon with his pyjama trousers down and trailing round his feet ! Dr. Jameson was selected by Rhodes to ad- 1893] FERREIRA’S RAID 109 minister the New Country; and he could not have chosen better, for the situation required qualities which “the Doctor,” as he was affectionately called, possessed in a high degree—tact, perse- verance, confidence, and indomitable courage. Immediately the pioneers had entered the country a raid was made upon it by the Boers, under one Colonel Ferreira, and Jameson set off to meet him at Rhodes’s Drift, on the Limpopo. Ferreira tried bluster at first, but came to reason when a maxim was turned on the river, and its effects could be marked. The Boers were, however, invited to come in under shelter of the Chartered Company, and allowed to settle at and around Enkeldoorn, where they bid fair to establish a useful com- munity. THe MaraBeLteE War oF 1893 The occupation of Mashonaland by the pioneers did not have much effect on the Matabele warriors as a show of force, and I think they rather looked on the new occupiers of the territory as under tribute, as the Mashonas were. At all events, they continued their marauding expeditions, and finally waxed so bold as to slaughter a number of Mashonas who were working for the white settlers. A strong remonstrance was sent to Lo Bengula by Dr. Jameson in 1893, when the position had become intolerable. He returned the usual reply of not being able to keep his young bloods. in hand, and it was finally resolved to march on Bulawayo. After having communicated with 110 RHODES AND THE NORTH [CH. VII Rhodes, and the famous messages’ regarding the reference to Luke xiv. 31 having passed, Jameson set off with some 500 men, hotchkiss-guns, and maxims for Bulawayo, following the watershed. When one compares the result of the German operations in South-West Africa, where thousands of trained soldiers were unable to deal with a comparative handful of degenerate Hottentots, it strikes one as little short of miraculous that this little band of amateurs was not entirely extermi- nated on their advance against a nation of 20,000 warriors, to whom war and bloodshed were as the breath of their nostrils. : Certainly great fears were entertained for them until they had reached the open country beyond the Somabula forest near Shangani, and it is a mystery how the Matabele failed to rush them with the assegai® while they were passing through the thick forest, where their weapons of precision would have given them little or no advantage. They came of the same race by whom the 24th regiment was cut up at Isandhlwana in 1879. Major Forbes was in command of the troops, who had several engagements, the most severe being at Bembezi, about twenty miles from Bulawayo, where two whites, Arthur Cary and Siebert, were killed and who were buried at the spot by Bishop 1 On hearing from Jameson, Rhodes wired, ‘Read Luke xiv. 31” (‘Or what king, going to war against another king, sitteth not down first, and consulteth whether he be able with ten thousand to meet him that cometh against him with twenty thousand?”). Jameson’s reply was, “ All right: have read Luke xiv. 31.” 3 Assegai—spear, used by the Zulus and Matabele for stabbing at close quarters—by other tribes for throwing. They can throw them about 150 yards. 1893] WILSON’S DEATH 111 Knight-Bruce. Dr. Jameson pushed on ahead to Bulawayo, which he and his body-servant, Garlick, were the first to reach. They found the town in flames. Shortly afterwards they were joined by Rhodes, who had followed the column. Rhodes used to tell a story of his journey up, and said he had met some Indians who were on their way down country. He asked if they were not going to settle in the country. They replied, “Oh, yes; but the white men are at war with the natives now; but in the end the whites are sure to win, and then, when it is all over, we are coming back.” Lo Bengula had fled towards the north, and Forbes and his column set off in pursuit. Lo Bengula now wished to parley, and sent back a conciliatory present of £2,000; but this was received by two scouts, Wilson and Daniels, who stole and hid the amount. Getting no reply, the harassed king continued his flight. He crossed the Shangani some sixty miles north of Bulawayo, and Major Alan Wilson, with thirty-two men, crossed in hot pursuit of him. One of the natives who was with Lo Bengula afterwards told me that Lo Bengula at this time was very ill, and consumed quantities of muti (medicine). The Shangani now came down in flood, and Wilson and his party were cut off from the main body. They were then attacked by the crack Imbezu and Ingubu regi- ments, under Lo Bengula’s chief fighting induna, M’tyana, a true-blooded Zulu who had come from Zululand with Umaziligazi, and there the grim tragedy was enacted which brought undying honour to the names of Alan Wilson and _ those 112 RHODES AND THE NORTH [CH. VII who died with him. Sir Thomas Fuller says they died rather than desert wounded comrades. This was not so. They were cut off by the swollen Shangani River, and surrounded by thousands of some of the finest native fighters in Africa, and for them there was no escape,even had they wished it. Their firing was plainly heard by Forbes’s column, but he could render them no assistance, as, in addition to the river being impassable, he was himself fiercely attacked. He was so hard pressed that his men were reduced to eating their horses, and he at length had to retire, leaving his maxims, but carrying away the breech-blocks. His column came straggling in to where Gwelo now stands for two days. The natives who are likely to know do not care to speak of Wilson’s last stand; one rather likes to think they were ashamed of the exploit. But M’tyana, who was in command, told me himself that when they charged them with their stabbing assegais after the firing had ceased—their ammuni- tion being exhausted—seven were left standing, and that these sang; but of course what the words of that last song were can only be left to conjecture. The bones of Wilson’s party were afterwards collected, and first buried at Zimbabye, and later removed to the hill where lie Rhodes’s remains. Lo Bengula was said to have died, but his grave has never been found, even M’tyana professing ignorance of it. It is customary to bury native chiefs where only a few of the chief headmen would know the grave, and to bury them with weapons, wagons, and oxen, etc., unless a chief died in his kraal, when he is usually buried at the 1893] OCCUPATION OF MATABELELAND 113 doorway of his hut and the kraal is deserted, as old Bulawayo was when Umziligazi died. M’tyana was a fine specimen of a native, and lived near Rhodes’s Matoppo Farm. He took no part in the Rebellion of 1896. Some of these old Matabele, especially members of Lo Bengula’s family, were quite courteous and had nice manners—probably inherited from their Zulu ancestors. On visiting M’tyana on one occasion, one of his wives brought me a calabash of native beer to where I was sitting with him. I put out my hands to take it, but the old man, smiling and shaking his head, took it from me and drank a mouthful or two from it, and then handed it.to me, in accordance with old native custom. With the fall of Bulawayo the power of the Matabele was looked upon as broken, and another great tract of territory was added to the Chartered Company’s holdings. A force of police was en- rolled and the land cut up into farms, which were, however, only half the size of the Mashonaland farms—1,500 instead of 3,000 morgen'—and an ever-increasing tide of immigration set in. Living in Lo Bengula’s kraal in 1893 were a Cape boy, John Jacobs, who was the king’s private secretary, and a fugitive from Tongoland named Umvulaan, who could read and write English and Dutch, and who came up to Bula- wayo with Babyan and Umshete (Lo Bengula’s envoys to Queen Victoria) when they returned from England. John Jacobs disappeared in 18938, but Umvulaan, who, to the amusement of the high-class Matabele, called himself Karl Kumalo, ' Morgen—a little over two acres. 9 114 RHODES AND THE NORTH [cH. vi was sentenced to death in 1896, and, being taken out for execution, three men were told off to shoot him. One bullet passed through his thumb, another through his side, and the third took him in the forehead, but, as a high-velocity bullet will do, it travelled round the skull beneath the scalp and continued its flight; and when a party went out to bury him next day it was found that he had crawled away. This is the native referred to by Olive Schreiner in her book “ Peter Halkett of Mashonaland.” Umvulaan reappeared after the Rebellion of 1896, but at the beginning of the Boer War I saw him at Fort Usher in the Matoppos, where he was under arrest for sedition and trying to stir up the natives. What has since become of him I don’t know, but he often made tender enquiries after the members of the firing party who operated on him. As to ‘“ Peter Halkett,” Rhodes always put the production of that down to spite. Its history, as he used to tell it, was that, whilst on a voyage to England, Olive Cronwright- Schreiner (or Mrs. Cronwright, her maiden name of Schreiner having been adopted by her husband, Cronwright) was on board, and was talking to a friend in Rhodes’s hearing, when the friend re- marked, “ Why don’t you write another book, Miss Schreiner? It is quite a time since your ‘Story of an African Farm’ appeared.” “Oh, I don’t know,” replied Olive Schreiner; “I don’t think I could write another.” Rhodes immediately said, “ You're quite right, Miss Schreiner. You couldn’t write another book. You've put all your thoughts and ideas into your book, and now 1895] MATABELE REBELLION 115 you haven’t got it in you to write another one.” Miss Schreiner was much annoyed, and not long afterwards appeared “'Trooper Peter Halkett ot Mashonaland.” Rhodesia, as Matabeleland and Mashonsiaha were now called, was in 1895 in a fair way to a peaceful settlement, farms were being occupied, homesteads erected, and mining properties opened | up. But events occurred in the south which con- siderably threw back the development of the country. The Johannesburg revolution was in the air, and Dr. Jameson had gone down to Pitsani Pothlugo (near Mafeking) with guns intended for the defence of Bulawayo, and he was accompanied by most of the police. The published object of his departure was to take over the Bechuanaland Border Police from the Cape Colony to the service of the Chartered Company ; but, as is known, at Christmas 1895 he led the combined force to the protection of life and property in Johannesburg. After his surrender to the Boers the country was in a very unprotected state, the police having been withdrawn, and the Matabele, who had never been really beaten, seized an unique opportunity to rise in rebellion. They had heard that “ U’dogetele” (the Doctor) was a prisoner in the hands of the Boers, and they were enraged at the wholesale slaughter of their cattle, which were shot to check the ravages of rinderpest. Besides such small superstitions as that the rainfall had diminished, and that the red locusts (amakiwa) had only appeared since the advent of the white man, while the outbreak of rinderpest 116 RHODES AND THE NORTH [CH. VII coincided with his arrival as well, they alleged many real grievances, such as extortion by the newly enlisted native police, whom they also accused of taking their women without /obola.' This they highly resented, as the native police were indiscriminately recruited, and the high-bred Matabele would not tolerate their own amaholi (slaves) being placed in authority over them, much less give their daughters to them. They were, furthermore, cast into a state of frenzy by one whom they called the “ Mlimo”—a mysterious . person who was supposed to inhabit a cave in the Matoppos, and who prophesied that the white man’s bullets would be turned to water and the whites driven into the sea. A few of the indunas remained friendly, mainly the older ones, like M’tyana and Faku; these both lived on or near Rhodes’s Matoppo farms, as did some of the worst rebels, like Bozingwan, the witch-doctor, Soma- bulana, Dhliso, and Umlugulu. (Rhodes said he liked having them near, so that he could keep his eye on them.) Babyan, Rhodes’s old friend, also lived on the farm, and he took an active part until one night he ill-advisedly attacked Faku, and was severely trounced. He then retired in high dudgeon to his fastness, which he called Kantole, a corruption of Dutch “kantoor ”—meaning office. Some of the friendlies turned out, and were led by an undersized stripling named Betyana, who had a most repulsive appearance, having lost an eye, and who was at the same time suffering from an in- curable disease. He seemed, however, to have great ‘ Lobola—the price in cattle paid for a wife to her father. 1896] THE MLIMO 117 influence with the natives. As to the identity of the Mlimo (all that survives of him now is his name given as a nickname to Arthur Montagu Rhodes), I remember a great picture that appeared in one of the illustrated papers, depicting the Scouts Burnham and Armstrong dashing for their lives before the Matabele, and mounted upon such horses as Rhodesia has never seen, after having slain the Mlimo; but the identity of the prophet was never established. After the cessation of hostilities, however, Faku, the friendly induna, came to Rhodes and demanded compensation for the death of one of his slaves, an old holt, who, he said, had been shot by Burnham and Armstrong while he was hoeing in a mealie patch. The Rebellion commenced with a wholesale massacre of men, women, and children at outlying farms and in prospecting camps, and in most cases the bodies were horribly mutilated ; women’s hair was torn out by the roots, and the bodies of little babies were found which had been pounded up in mealie-stampers in the sight of their mothers. Is it a wonder, therefore, that some of the men who had lost brothers, wives, children, when, during the subsequent fighting, they saw these results of the natives’ handiwork, “saw red” and took reprisals, in some cases throwing aside their rifles and killing the niggers with their hands ? 1896 was indeed a disastrous year for Rhodes. The close of 1895 saw him at the zenith of his power, and the opening of 1896 saw him a broken man. Rinderpest cleared Rhodesia of cattl and 118 RHODES AND THE NORTH [cH. VII swept away vast herds of buffalo and other game, and the curses of the country were then summed up in the three R’s—“ Rinderpest, Raid, and Re- bellion.” Rhodes had been called upon to resign the chairmanship of the Chartered Company, and he did so, but this made very little material difference, as he held and retained the Company’s general power of attorney. He was always more or less of an autocrat in Rhodesia, and did not hesitate to grant concessions or exemptions if a man made out a good case. His example has been emulated by the directors of the B.S.A. Company in the way of making special grants of land and in the giving of special title to farms which under the mining regulations are withheld from the ordinary settler. Rhodes took a more or less active part in the Rebellion, and was at times in great personal danger and the cause of much anxiety to his friends. He did not, however, carry arms. When he was entering the country, two columns were sent to escort him, and friction arose between the officers in command as to seniority, as both held the rank of colonel. Rhodes, on ascertaining the cause of the dispute, said, “Il be the leader, I'll be colonel, and so that’s settled.” A cable im- mediately came out from Home—“ Hear you have appointed yourself colonel—wire explanation.” I don’t know what reply, if any, was sent, but a medal for the campaign was issued to him as “Colonel the Right Honourable C. J. Rhodes,” and it is now at Groote Schuur. 1896] MILITARY OPERATIONS 119 The towns went into laager and troops were enrolled. There was also a body of Cape boys who did yeoman service in the kopjes. There were only one or two square fights, the natives soon retiring from open country to the Matoppos, whence it was impossible to dislodge them. Regular Imperial troops were also employed, and were of the utmost service. The extra cost of their employment was, moreover, borne by the Chartered Company and not by Her Majesty’s Government. Of the Imperial officers, one in four was wounded during the operations in Mashonaland, which makes one realize that the military operations were a stern experience to the troops engaged—while nearly five hundred men out of the Rhodesian community were lost in murdered, in killed, or from wounds and exposure, and this amounted to practically a decimation of the white population in Rhodesia at that time. At N’taba zi ka Mambo, Rhodes and a small body of troops were almost cut off, and Rhodes was nearly hit, a bullet striking the ground under his horse. ‘“ D’you know,” he said afterwards, “it was a very near thing. I might have been hit in the stomach, which would have been very unpleasant, and I should have been very angry.” He also added afterwards, “I was never in such a funk in my life.” A story was told me that it was at the same place that supplies of liquor, tobacco, etc., ran very short, and Jewish traders used to drive up in all sorts of vehicles with assorted articles, and their stocks were very soon sold out. One day a 120 RHODES AND THE NORTH [CH. VII wagonette drove up, and a number of thirsty and tobaccoless troopers ran up at the sight of a Jewish type of countenance peering out. “ Got any beer ?” cried one. “ No,” was the reply. « Any stout, whisky, dop ?” “No, no.” « Any cigarettes or tobacco?” “No,” again. “Then what the hell have you got? and what do you want here, anyway?” one disappointed trooper shouted. Then somebody recognized Rhodes. All the troops engaged in suppressing the rebellion were placed under the command of General Sir Frederick Carrington, while Sir Richard Martin had been sent out in May as Resident Commissioner to report to the Imperial Government. The Matabele had taken to the fastnesses of the Matoppos, from which they refused to budge, and Sir Frederick Carrington had camped near Rhodes’s farms and had established a chain of forts along the Matoppos, and sorties into the hills were made—without, however, effecting very much. Rhodes then determined to see whether “conciliation” might not avail where there seemed little probability of force succeeding, and he made his camp some distance from the main body. Earl and Countess Grey were there with Mr. and Mrs. Colenbrander, Dr. Hans Sauer, J. G. McDonald, Grimmer, Jourdan, Vere Stent the journalist, and a few friends. Rhodes managed to establish communication with the rebels, cul- 1896] SELECTION OF BURIAL SITE 121 minating in his historic indaba with them, when, accompanied by Colenbrander, Dr. Hans Sauer. and Vere Stent, he rode into the hills, and, having met the indunas, he persuaded them of their folly. He had the most extraordinary influence over natives, and no native could look him in the face. It is certain that.a large number of them looked on him as mad, and therefore he would be per- fectly safe from personal violence from them. Before he succeeded in obtaining the submission of the Matabele he had to spend many weary weeks in his camp at the foot of the Matoppos. The chief negotiator between Rhodes and the rebels was one of Umziligazi’s wives (not, however, the mother of Lo Bengula), and the old lady’s photograph used to hang in Rhodes’s bedroom at Groote Schuur. , It was while he was waiting for the Matabele to surrender that he selected the site for his grave. He and Sir Frederick Carrington, Lady Grey, and J. G. McDonald used to take long rides into the Matoppos. One day they rode further than usual, and climbed the hill known as Malindi N’zema. or ‘The Worship of the Departed Spirit.” He was very much impressed with the wild grandeur of the Matoppos, as who is not who has gazed on that endless sea of rugged granite boulders? The hill is not very far from where Umailigazi is buried. The founder of the Matabele nation is interred in a cave on the top of a kopje, and round the cave his wagons, etc.. were buried. The body was placed in a sitting posture, as is customary with the natives, at the back of the cave, and the 122 RHODES AND THE NORTH [cu vit front, where three large rocks made a natural arch- way, was walled up with stones. During the Rebellion the grave was torn open, and some of the bones of the dead king and his assegais, etc., were carried off as mementoes. Rhodes had a search made for these, and had them re- placed in the grave, which was walled up once more. “J admire,” said he one day, when on the hill where his remains now rest, “the imagination of Umzilagazi. There he lies, a conqueror alone, watching over the land that he had won. When I die, I mean to be buried here, and I shall have the bones of those brave men who helped me take the country brought from Zimbabye.” He instructed J. G. McDonald to see that this was done, and added anxiously, “ You don’t think that they will object,” referring to the relatives of the deceased heroes of Shangani, whose bones have, in accordance with Rhodes’s wish, since been moved from Zimbabye to a spot on the hill where he lies. Rhodes often referred to Umaziligazi sitting alone, as it were, watching over his people. “The World’s View” he called the view from the hill; and it certainly is very fine and wild, although I have seen many grander. On the first occasion when he took me up to the hill he told me to shut my eyes as we approached the summit, and he led me up, and then said, “ Now look: what do you think of it?” I did not know then that I was expected to be wildly enthusiastic, and as I was disappointed in it I said, ‘Oh, 1 don’t know—it’s rather fine.” He immediately flew into a rage and 1896] PEACE NEGOTIATIONS 128 said, “I suppose if Jesus Christ were to ask you what you thought of Heaven, you'd say, ‘Oh, I don’t know, it isn’t bad.’” ‘Every one will come and see that view,” he said once to Brailsford ; “ but if you had a view no one would take the trouble to go and look at it.” The negotiations for peace were long and tedious, and besides a little shooting Rhodes’s only recreations were reading and taking long rides. The rebels were safely ensconced and refused to come out, but their supply of grain was running short, and many were dying of fever in the unhealthy granite. Rhodes amused himself in talking to the friendly natives and to others who had surrendered. He spoke a smattering of Zulu and kitchen Kafir picked up in Natal and Kimberley, and he generally contrived to make himself understood. One of the first to surrender was Babyan, a true Zulu, then eighty-two years of age. He and one Umshete were sent by Lo Bengula as envoys to Queen Victoria in 1889, and he had a great fund of tales with which he used to amuse “the Old Man.” He disliked being chaffed about his visit to London, although he ran about as naked as the day he was born, excepting for a kilt of wild-cat’s tails. One day Colonel Napier jocularly remarked, “ Well, Babyan, how’s the Queen?” “Ow,” retorted Babyan, “we won't say anything about that; but, you know, if you went to England, you couldn’t go and talk to the Queen like I can ; you might see her in her carriage far off, but if you went to shake hands with her they would drive you away.” He knew 124 RHODES AND THE NORTH [CH. VII only two phrases of English—“ Yes, sir” and “ Good night ”—but he would repeat them on every possible occasion. He was very fond of offering to shake hands with strangers, until he tried it on a young South African in the streets of Bulawayo. Your South African doesn’t like that sort of thing, and this one picked up a stone the size of half a brick and banged Babyan over the head with it. Babyan raced off in a great rage to report to Rhodes, but he got little sympathy. When Babyan left England, Her Majesty gave him a gold bracelet with “ Babyan from the Queen” on it. This he sold to a trader in Tati, from whom Rhodes bought it. When taxed by Rhodes with having sold the Queen’s gift, he unhesitatingly replied, ‘‘ How could I, a mere dog, presume to keep anything that belonged to the Great White Queen ?” Some time afterwards, while I was at Fort Usher in the Matoppos, a large number of natives, led by Babyan, came in and asked that a certain missionary who had just come into the country might be hanged. He was asked why, and replied that the missionary had described a great ’» Koos pezulu,’ who was supreme over the earth, and had asked them if they knew what he meant. One immediately replied, «« U’Lawli ” (Lawley, the Administrator). He was told he was wrong. “Umlamula M’kunzi” (Rhodes), said another ; but again the missionary said, “No; some one greater than Rhodes.” Then Babyan, with an air of confidence, said, “i? Queeni” (the Queen). ' Chief up above. 1896] BABYAN THE WILY 125 “No,” said the missionary ; “‘ some one even greater than the Queen.” “ U’ Yamanga” (you liar), cried Babyan, and the natives rose and left in a body to have the missionary hanged for daring to say that there was any one greater than the Great White Queen. Babyan told us the story of his dining at Windsor, and related how, when they sat down, there was a great number of knives and forks, and he wondered what they were going to do with them all. “Never mind,” he said to himself, “there is plenty of time; Pll watch and see what the others do.” He did, and came through the ordeal with credit. “Then,” said he, “a beautiful lady came with flowers, and gave me one to put in my coat. Then I saw another lady, who also had roses, and I liked her better, and I wanted to throw my flower away, but I was afraid I would be seen and there would be trouble, so I showed her the other side of the coat and said, “ Here, put one in here too. I wanted her for a wife, and thought over it for a long time; but then I remembered the train only went as far as Mafeking, and she would have to walk to Bulawayo, and she didn’t look as if she could walk very well. Then she would want to eat rice and sugar and be very expensive, so I thought I’d better not say anything about it.” Babyan was a diplomat. When he and his fellow envoy were approaching Bulawayo on their return from England, he said to his companion, “M’Shete, what are you going to tell Lo Bengula ?” 126 RHODES AND THE NORTH [CH. VII “Oh,” replied M’Shete, “I'll tell him all we saw.” “‘ About the soldiers too ?” asked Babyan. “ Yes,” said M’Shete. “ M’Shete,” Babyan warned him, “you are a fool, and you will lose your head. J am going to take off these clothes and return as I left, and I shall tell Lo Bengula to have no fear of the Queen’s armies, as his warriors would eat them up.” *«* And,” added Babyan, when he told us the tale, “I was right. Here I am to-day, alive and well, and M’Shete—his head is off.” Babyan asked Rhodes to allow him to stay in his camp after he surrendered. There was some method in this, as he well knew if he went back to the Matoppos he would be killed. Rhodes suggested that he should rather endeavour to persuade the other rebels to surrender. “No,” said Babyan, “it is better this way: when they see me sitting here and getting fatter and fatter every day they will say, ‘ Look at Babyan—he fought as long as he thought there was a hope, and then he surrendered ; and now he gets fatter every day. Let us go and do the same.’ ” “Yes,” replied Rhodes, “but I’m afraid your stomach has more to do with it than a desire for peace, Babyan ; but after all the stomach has had a great deal to do with the destiny of nations.” After the chiefs had surrendered, Rhodes addressed them and said, “« Now everything is over and you are going to have peace, and you have to thank “ Johan” (Colenbrander) for it all.” “No, no,” they replied, “ Johan is only the tick- 1896] END OF THE REBELLION 127 bird '—you are the rhinoceros.” (This will appeal to any one who knows the native.) Rhodes was always fond of talking to natives, and petted them a great deal. On his birthday, July 5, 1897, he had a great gathering of natives on his farms, and some 4,000 executed a war-dance. He sent in to Bulawayo, about eighteen miles off, and got out bales of blankets and cloth, not to speak of hundreds of sovereigns and half-sovereigns as presents for them, and providing oxen and sheep for them to slaughter and feast on. Natives to him were merely adult children—he truly enjoyed sitting and chaffing them in a smattering of different dialects he had picked up. After the peace negotiations were concluded, the Matabele named Rhodes “Umlamula M’kunzi,” meaning in abbreviation, “The Man who Separated the Fighting Bulls,” the bulls being, of course, the whites and themselves. They used to add to his name, in shouting greeting to him, “ but you should have let them fight it out.” Immediately things were settled, Rhodes made preparations for de- parture for Salisbury, a fact which caused Lady Grey to say to him one day, “I wonder at you, Mr. Rhodes, with your energy, patiently waiting here when there are so many things you want to do.” “Well, I should like,” replied Rhodes, “to be like Cincinnatus, who gave up a throne and went and grew cabbages. Such a peaceful life—such ! Tick-bird—this bird follows the rhinoceros about, and, perching on him, forages for ticks. They also settle on cattle, and often peck holes in the hide, causing ulcers 128 RHODES AND THE NORTH [cH. vu a peaceful life. And,” he added, “I’d grow very good cabbages, too, mark you.” In August 1896 Rhodes set off for Salisbury and Beira on his way to England to attend the Commission of Inquiry on the Raid. On arriving at Enkeldoorn (the Dutch settlement), he found the burghers had been in laager for some months, drawing 7s. 6d. per day each, and that only a few miles off was the kraal of the native chief, who kept them in awe, and had refused to surrender. He immediately said, “We'll go out and attack the kraal,” and at midnight the column (or commando) started and climbed the kopje on which the kraal was, Rhodes puffing along in his white flannel trousers with the best of them, a little riding-switch in his hand. They arrived at the kraal with the first glint of day, and attacked the unsuspecting natives, who were shot as they ran from their huts. Some seventy were killed, there being only one white casualty, a man named Schwartz shot through the lung, but he survived. The column then returned to the foot of the kopje, and an argument shortly arose as to the number killed, Rhodes saying one thing and some one else (probably Grimmer) another. “Very well,” said the Old Man, “we'll count them again,” and immediately started off up the kopje alone to make a recount of the bodies. The night before the fight one of the burghers had a quarrel with a sergeant-major, whom he struck. A complaint was immediately made to Rhodes, and he sent for the burgher, who admitted the offence. 1896] MASHONA REBELLION 129 “Of course,” said Rhodes, “I know there was a woman at the bottom of it. There always is. You needn’t tell me anything about it. I know.” The railway from the south was now being pushed on with all possible speed, as its completion meant the solving of the transport difficulty, which the ravages of rinderpest had made a very serious one. Up to then only ox transport had been employed, but during 1897 mules and donkeys were used, and I hope never to see again suffering such as was endured by the overworked animals in those days. The coach-mules were so poor that they could barely drag the coaches at walking pace, and had to be flogged on from stage to stage. Khama, the Bechuana chief, is said to have lost 750,000 head of cattle by rinderpest, and on the old Hunter’s Road I counted seventy of his wagons, abandoned with their loads, for any one to loot, the oxen having died of rinderpest. The Matabele Rebellion was no sooner over than the insurrection spread to Mashonaland, and the country was “up” from the Shangani to Umtali. It was not finally quelled until late in 1897. Here, too, a great number of murders were perpetrated before warning could reach outlying farms and stations. The Mashonas, who are a low type, and have none of the chivalrous instincts bequeathed to the Matabele by their Zulu ancestors, exceeded the Matabele in cruelty, and many atrocities and cases of torturing occurred. One unfortunate was captured in the Lo Magondi District, and _ his hands and feet having been hacked off, and the 10 130 RHODES AND THE NORTH (CH. VII stumps seared to stop the bleeding, and his eyes gouged out, the Mashonas amused themselves by prodding him with hot assegais to make him wriggle. It was nearly three days before death brought him merciful release. Another man dis- covered the disembowelled body of his fiancée hanging from a rafter by a meat-hook, which had been thrust through her hand. Before leaving for England to attend the Com- mission, Rhodes spoke both at Cape Town and Port Elizabeth. “I am going home,” said he, “to face the ‘unctuous rectitude’ of my country- men.” Many of his friends were seriously alarmed at the probable effect of these words, and tried to get him to modify or withdraw them. Some went so far as to come and meet his ship at Madeira. “‘Say something else,” they advised. “Say you were misreported, and said ‘anxious or upright rectitude ’—anything.” “No,” he replied, “I said unctuous rectitude, and I meant it.” Talking to some friends afterwards he re- marked that he never made notes nor prepared his speeches. “And what about the ‘unctuous rectitude’ phrase, Mr. Rhodes ?” asked the friend. “Oh, that,” he replied, with a twinkle of the eye—‘“‘that I had ready three days before I spoke.” Rhodes returned to the Cape after giving his ° evidence before the Commission, and received a tremendous ovation in Cape Town. It was a wild, gusty day, and it was almost impossible to hear 1897] FUTURE PLANS 131 what was said, but one phrase sticks, and was the key-note of his speech—“ My career is only just beginning.” He then drove out to the ruins of Groote Schuur, where the new house was rising phoenix-like from the ashes. He paid one or two flying visits to Kimberley, and then determined to throw himself into northern expansion and development. “I have always loved the north,” he said—