KFP
520
3é/
/fo
Qornell Law School Library
eo
“an
RECOMMENDATIONS OF BINNS’S JUSTICE OF THE PEACE.
PHILADELPHIA, January 28, 1840.
Dear Sir :—
The sheets of ‘‘ Binns’s Justice,” which you did me the honor to submit to my inspec-
tion, have been carefully examined; and though sensible that nothing detracts so much
from the value of a recommendation as an apparent disposition to overpraise, I teel con-
fident that the book will fully bear me out in saying, it is a well-digested compend of all
eee is necessary to qualify a young magistrate for a useful and honorable discharge of his
‘unctions.
It offers to him the fruits of long experience and accurate research ; and it opens to him
a repository of legal principles, with minute directions for their use, from which he may
ae draw whatever is necessary to conduct him safely in the new and untrodden path
of his duty.
The Docket-Entries, for instance, given as specimens of method in recording the general
parts and transactions of a suit—matters in which, more frequently than in any other,
magistrates are at fault—though compendious, are sufficiently full; and a reasonable
attention to the marginal specimens of taxation, will guard the unwary from those inad-
vertent charges of fees, which serve too often to put the magistrate in the power of the
suitor, and to involve him in a contest about farthings, which may cost him dollars; to
say nothing of the loss of character, which, right or wrong, follows an infliction of the
penalty annexed to extortion.
These, however, are comparatively trifling instances of the value of the book: as a
manual, it will be more signally useful in furnishing a safe and ready guide in the most
somplicated forms of proceedings, such as summary.convictions, and many others.
The matter is, for the most part, original, and supplies whatever has been omitted in
other treatises. It will afford assistance, not only to the judicial magistrate, but to every
county and township officer; and it will reward the citizen, for a careful perusal of it,
with much exact knowledge of his civil and political rights, as well as of his correlative
duties. Not doubting that the inculcation of moral principle which pervades the whole,
will influence the character, and elevate the standing, of the magistracy, I am, dear sir,
Your obedient servant,
JOHN B. GIBSON,
Chief Justice of Pennsylvania.
I fully concur in the above.
MOLTON C. ROGERS,
One of the Justices of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
1 have seen a portion of Mr. Binns’s proposed publication, relative to justices of the
peace, and think it will furnish an excellent manual on the subject, more especially to
the magistracy. It seems to me to be well adapted to the present wants of the commu-
ity. 4
si THOMAS SERGEANT,
One of the Justices of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Philadelphia, January 31, 1840.
Jupce Huston [of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania] presents his compliments to
John Binns, Esq., and informs him that since the sheets of his book were left for persual,
he has been too unwell to peruse much of it. He has been in court every day, but at
home has been lying on a bed most of his time. He can, therefore, only say, that
from the very limited inspection of the work, he has formed a very favorable opinion of
it, and believes it will be what, from his knowledge of the author, and from the general
character of the author, he, and the community, expected, viz., a full and accurate trea-
tise on the office and duties of a justice of the peace.
February 1, 1840. (i)
RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SECOND EDITION.
February 3, 1845.
Drar Sir :—
The forthcoming “ Magistrate's Daily Companion” is u decisive improvement on
“ Binns's Justice.” Its abstracts of reported cases, arranged under proper heads, offer,
not only to the magistrate, but the citizen of any profession, a cueap and easy means of
obtaining a competent knowledge of the laws under which he lives. In affairs of magni-
tude he will, of course, consult a professional adviser, but the ordinary transactions of
business momentarily require a familiar knowledge of common-place principles, which
he may more readily obtain from the digested summary now offered to him, than from
the scattered pages of a law-library, were it even at hand. For instance, the farmer, the
laborer, the mechanic, or the shop-keeper, who attends to your instructions, will no longer
be in danger of losing the price of his work or his goods, from ignorance of the few and
simple elements of book-entries to charge a customer. These abstracts are not only accu-
rately made, but adapted to popular apprehension ; and I feel confident the work will
supply, for the present, all that was wanted.
- Very truly, your obedient servant,
JOHN B. GIBSON,
Chief Justice of Pennsylvania.
To Mr. ALDERMAN BINNs.
Philadelphia, January 4th, 1845.
Dear Sir :—
I have carefully examined, with much satisfaction, a portion of your “ Magistrate's
Daily Companion, and Business-Man’s Legal Guide.” Your arrangement is capital, and
you have taken great pains to insure its legal accuracy. It should be in the hands of
every magistrate, as well as young lawyer and man of business.
I wish it general circulation, because I am confident it will be of great utility. You
deserve the thanks of the community for this work. I have no doubt it will live when
you are dead. Every relation in life will find your book useful.
With respect, your obedient servant,
THOS. BURNSIDE,
One of the Justices of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Alderman Jouy Brinys.
RECOMMENDATION OF THE THIRD EDITION
From tHe Jupcss or roe Surrewe Court or PENNSYLVANIA.
arc Kay & Brotuer :—
entlemen: Binns’s Justice is not only the best, but the only ver
have on the subject. The present edition, containing, as it ane a ieee ation ete
able and well-digested matter, makes it all that the magistrate can desire.
; JOHN B. GIBSON,
Chief Justice of the Supreme Court,
MOLTON ©. ROGERS,
T. BURNSIDE,
R. COULTER,
THOS. S. BELL,
Justices of the Supreme Court,
(ii)
BINNS’S JUSTICE,
OR
Meagistrate’s Daily Companion.
A TREATISE
ON THE
OFFICE AND DUTIES
oF
ALDERMEN AND JUSTICES OF THE PEACE,
IN THE
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
INCLUDING ALL THE REQUIRED
FORMS OF PROCESS*AND DOCKET-ENTRIES,
AND EMBODYING NOT ONLY WHATEVER MAY BE DEEMED VALUABLE TO JUSTICES OF THE PEACE, BUT TO
LANDLORDS, TENANTS AND GENERAL AGENTS; AND MAKING THIS VOLUME WHAT IT PURPORTS TO BE,
A SAFE LEGAL GUIDE FOR BUSINESS MEN,
ORIGINALLY COMPILED BY
JOHN BINNS,
AND AFTERWARDS CORRECTED AND ENLARGED
BY THE LATE
FREDERICK C. BRIGHTLY, Esq.
TENTH EDITION.
REVISED, CORRECTED AND GREATLY ENLARGED
BY
FRANK F. BRIGHTLY, Esa.
PHILADELPHIA:
KAY & BROTHER,
LAW BOOKSELLERS, PUBLISHERS AND IMPORTERS.
1895.
Lbyyy
Entered, according to the Act of Congress, in the year 1895, by
KAY & BROTHER,
in the Office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington.
PREFACE TO THE TENTH EDITION.
In the preparation of this revised edition of Binns’s Justice
the present author has been careful not to interfere with the
work which has been so well done by his predecessors, except
where it became necessary to strike out obsolete, repealed or
unconstitutional laws.
The present author in this revision has also added such
new enactments and decisions as have appeared since the pub-
lication of the ninth edition, and whenever it became necessary
to cite an act of assembly he has referred to the page of the
twelfth edition of Brightly’s Purdon’s Digest which has just
been published. The Law FoRMS and DOCKET-ENTRIES and
BILLS OF Costs have also been again revised and made to con-
form with the law as it is to-day, and the author is confident
that justices, magistrates and business men may still rely upon
this publication as a safe guide.
F. F. BRIGHTLY.
PHILADELPHIA, 1 May 1895.
(v)
PREFACE TO THE NINTH EDITION.
BINNS’S JUSTICE or MaaistRaTe’s Dairy ComPANION,
has for many years been favorably known to the Legal Pro-
fession, and to the Magistracy of Pennsylvania ; so much so
as to have been pronounced by the unanimous certificate of the
Judges of the Supreme Court, as “not only the best, but the
only very good book that we have on the subject.” The enact-
ment, however, of the new Constitution of 1874, and the pas-
sage of the numerous acts of assembly necessary to carry its
provisions into effect, since the publication of the last Edition
of this work in 1870, had rendered it, not only, no longer, what
it professed to be, “a safe legal guide to business men,” but a
guide which, if followed, might oftener lead astray, than con-
duct the inquirer upon the direct path of legal duty.
This rendered necessary an entire revision of the work,
which has been almost wholly re-written by the Editor, who
has not only remodelled the book and adapted it to the present
state of the law, but has added many new Titles, not before
contained in it. The Forms and DocKEet-ENTRIES, as also the
Bills of Costs, have been revised and made to correspond with
the requirements of the recent statutés; and it may now again
be confidently relied on as a safe guide to the Magistrate and
Business Man.
In this book, and its companion, “ DunuApP’s Forms,” the
(reputation of which is so well established as to need no
eulogy) the Justice of the Peace will find all the information
necessary to a correct discharge of the important duties con-
fided to him by the Laws of Pennsylvania.
The Eleventh Edition of Purdon’s Digest, published in 1885,
has been referred to, whenever it became necessary to cite an
Act of Assembly; and the Decisions of the Supreme Court
have been incorporated to the 107th volume of the State
Reports inclusive, as well as the statutes enacted at the session
of 1885.
F. C. B.
PHILADELPHIA, 15 July 1886. :
(vi)
PREFACE TO BINNS’S JUSTICE.
Lone and deeply impressed with the influence which magistrates
must necessarily exercise over the public mind, it has appeared to
the writer, that the man who should most effectually turn that.
influence to the insurance of the public peace, and of honesty and
fair dealing, between man and man, would render an essential
and important service.
Justices of the peace who understand their rights, and discreetly
perform their duties, obtain the respect of their fellow-citizens.
In the volume now presented to the public, it is hoped, and
believed, that the law is plainly laid down; that honest and hon-
orable feelings are cherished; and that everything calculated to
encourage a spirit of contention or litigation is frowned upon.
The wish of the writer is to place the magistracy in high and
enviable seats; there, to exhibit examples of stern integrity;
respected by all; feared only by evil-doers.
It is not presumed, that much is accomplished in this volume ;
yet, it is confidently hoped, that whatever may be its influence,
it will be found on the side of the Constitution and the Laws;
sturdily contending, for ‘‘ Virtue, Liberty, and Independence.”
The writer is conscious of the want of many, and not incon-
siderable, qualifications to prepare a work of the character he has
ventured to undertake and tocomplete. He has labored long and
faithfully, and with good intentions: he trusts that the industry
and experience thus devoted, has, in some measure, compensated
for the want of early professional habits and acquirements.
He has been cheered on his way by encouragement from many,
whose encouragement did him honor, while it inspired him with
hope and confidenée. He is especially under obligations to the
(vii)
vili PREFACE.
gentlemen of the bar. They have not only freely bestowed their
advice, and corrected his errors, but some of them, with a friend-
liness and regard, which le will never forget, have given their
time, and their talents, and their knowledge, to contribute to the
more perfect completion of this work.
Care shall be taken, from time to time, to note whatever improve-
ments or additions shall be proposed, or which may suggest them-
selves; to the end, that by unwearied attention, and constant
watchfulness, the work may be made to deserve public approba-
tion. To assist in accomplishing this object, advice, information
and correction, are respectfully invited.
An anxiety to make this volume useful to men of business,
generally, and a desire to avoid references from one part of the
work to another, have, it is feared, occasionally caused the pub-
lication of matter which, however its usefulness may be acknowl-
edged, may sometimes be thought out of place.
This anxiety and desire have also caused the publication of
directions so minute and particular, that they may be regarded as
of a character too humble and familiar to find a place in this
volume. The same feelings have induced the writer, in several
places, to reiterate principles and directions, which he regards as
especially valuable.
It has been felt that many will come to the reading of this
volume with but little knowledge of law, and none of the practical
duties of a justice of the peace. Thoroughly to imbue their minds
with first principles, with the great truths upon which all the
duties of the magistracy turn, the writer has made many repeti-
tions, and but few references.
Such as the volume is, he commits it to the public, with a
reasonable confidence that it will be useful; that it will have some
influence in the administration of the law; and that whatever
tbat influence may be, it will be on the side of justice.
JOHN BINNS,
Paivaperata, 1 February 1840.
TABLE OF CONTENTS.
Constitution of the United States
Constitution of Pennsylvania
Vocabulary of Law Terms
Technical Law Terms explained .
Law Phrases, &c., translated .
Abatement
Abduction
Abortion
Academic Degrees .
Accessory
Actions at Law ;
Actions against Justices of the Pace s
Acts of Assembly .
Adulteration
Adultery
Advice
Affray
Agricultural Goeiatieas
Amendment
Appeals
Apprentices
Arrest for debt
Arson
Assault and Battery
Assignments
Assumpsit .
Attachment, Dunesitc ‘
Attachment against Absent and Preudulent Debtors ‘
Attachment in Execution
Attachment for Contempt .
Attorneys: :
Auctions
Bail
Bail and Ciimiimenes in ‘Gaainal Cases.
Bailment
Bankruptcy ‘ ‘ 3
Banks . 5 j ‘ F
Barrator
(ix)
PAGE
15
37
67
84
81
89
92
93
94
95
99
603
140
148
149
152
154
155
156
157
164
176
178
181
183
188
189
194
201
212
213
215
216
218
223
226
227
230
¥ TABLE OF
Beneficial Societies .
Bible, Family
Bigamy . : :
Bills of Exchange .
Bonds
Books required by a ¥ Magistrate :
Bread and Flour ;
Bribery ;
Building Assweiations
Buoys and Beacons
Burglary
Burial Grounds .
Butter and Cheese .
Cattle.
Certiorari
Cigarettes .
Commissions and Dichaepes ‘
Common Carriers
Common Law
Common Scold .
Compounding Offences
Concealed Weapons
Conspiracy
Constables .
Contract
Convicts
Coroner .
Corporations
Costs
Counterfeiting
Counties and Townships .
Covenant
Cruelty
Custom and Usage
Damages
Debt . 3
Debtor and Crediton
Deeds
Defalcation
Dentists
Desertion
Distress for Rent
District-Attorneys .
Divorce
Docket .
Docket-Entries and. Hees
Dock Entries in Criminal Cases
CONTENTS.
PAGE
231
232
232
233
237
239
240
242
244
251
252
253
254
255
207
261
261
262
269
270
270
271
272
274
288
291
292
297
3803.
306
312
314
316
318
319
320
822
324,
331
334
334
836
844
845
347
350
362.
TABLE OF CONTENTS.
Dogs .
Drainage
Drunkenness
Duelling
Eaves-dropping
Elections , —,
Embankments, ;
Embezzlement . : : ‘ ;
Embracery ,
Engrossing, Porstalling ad Repretine -
Escape ‘ : :
Evidence
Execution
Executors and Aaoitiinteators
Explosives
Extortion .
Factories
Factors
False Imprisonment
False Personation
False Pretences
Fees .
Females
Fences
Ferries .
Fire Escapes
Fires.
Fireworks, &e,
Firing of Woods
Fish .
Fixtures
Floating Lumber
Forcible Entry and ieiatner
Forgery j
Fornication and Bastardly
Fortune-Telling
Frauds , ; ‘ é ; ; ea
Fraudulent Conveyances
Freeholders
Fugitives from Justice
Gambling
Game ‘ :
Guaranty ; 3 ; : ; és
Hawkers and Pedlars
Holidays
500,
PAGE
365
366
866
369
370
370
405
406
410
All
412
414
433
439
443
Ad4
AA5
449
450
451
451
AB5
460
460
462
464
A466
468
469
ATI
483
485
488
490
492,
495
496
897
501
502
505
611
516
518
621
xii TABLE OF CONTENTS.
Homicide .
Horse-Racing
Horse-Stealing .
House of Refuge
Tce
Incest
Indictment
Infants .
Informers .
Inns and Taverns .
Insolvent Laws .
Instalments
Insurance . a
Intelligence Offices
Interest
Jails
Joint-stock Companies
Judgment
Judgment, Lien ae :
Jurisdiction of Justices of the —
Justices of the Peace, or Aldermen
Justices of the Peace, Actions Against
Justices of the Peace, Jurisdiction of, under U. 8. Laws
Landlord and Tenant
Larceny and Receiving Stolen Goods
Law Forms , ‘
Lewdness
Libel
Lien . ‘
Limitation of Ration
Limited Partnership .
Lotteries
Magistrates’ Courts
Malicious Mischief
Malicious Prosecution
Malicious Trespass .
Markets
Marriage
Married Women
Master and Servant
Mayhem
Mechanics’ Lien
Military Orders .
Milk.
Mill-Dams
ie
690,
PAGE
523
526
530
531
535
5386
5387
538
543
544
503
562
562
565
566
569
571
574
576
578
581
603
607
609
648
647
678
680
682
684
769
689
694
695
702
699
703
704
708
715
717
718
737
738
740
TABLE OF CONTENTS. xiii
; PAGE
Misfeasance . ; 3 : ‘ ‘ . ; . TAL
Money ‘ ’ ; : . ‘ ‘ : : ; ‘ ‘ 741
Name . e : ‘ F 3 3 7 ‘ ‘ ‘ . T42
Naturalization iaive : s 3 ‘ $ is : 7 ‘ 923
Negligence . : ; . . ‘ . ; : , : . 743
Notary-public . j . 7 ‘ : ; ‘ . ; ‘ 745
Notice . F 3 A : 5 ¥ : ‘ : . TAT
Nuisance . 7 : ‘é ‘ ‘ s 3 2 2 ; F 748
Oaths and Affirmations . Z ‘ : A . 5 A e . 750
Officers, Public . ji ‘ ‘ i . . - 3 i { 752
Opium Joints 4 4 . ‘ . ‘ . . : ‘ . Td4
Original Entries ; 5% : . : . : . : : 756
Parent and Child . : . : é ‘ 3 4 ‘ - . 759
Partnership . ; . : . . ‘ . . : : 761
Party-walls. : ‘i : : - 7 . . : . . 75
Pawns or Pledges ‘ s : : 5 os : : ‘ 776
Penalties : ‘ . . 3 : : ; : . TTT
Perjury and Subomation ‘ < es <% a a ‘ ‘ : 778
Physicians. : . . 7 . 3 : ; : ‘ . 780
Poisons. : 5 5 * é % F : ; 5 é 786
Poor laws : 2 ‘i ° ‘ ; ‘ - ‘ j . 788
Principal and Agpat : 2 & : : . F : : : 800
Privilege é : 3 i ‘ - é 3 . ; j . 801
Prize-Fighting . 2 - ee) Mee , ‘ ‘ : 803
Process . ‘ ‘ ‘i ; é ‘ i : : : ‘ . 803
Profaneness : afc oe 2 i - Fi 5 j 4 ‘ 805
Promissory Notes . a. us . . ‘ : : . 807
Prothonotary. , s ; i : ; : : 814
Purchasers at Sheriffs’ " Sales - 5 : 2 , 3 : . . 815
Race and Color . : 3 “ _ 4 ; ; i , . 821
Railroads ‘ zi ‘ j . . : ‘ ‘ ; . 821
Rape . : = : : , : F : . ; é 822
Receipts . é : ‘ : : . : ‘ . ‘ 3 . 824
Records . A r 2 ‘ * : 825
Riots, Routs and “Unlawful "Assemblies _ é ‘ ‘ F 5 . 825
Roads and Highways . ; ‘ 3 ‘ : : ‘ ‘ ‘ 828
Robbery i ; ‘ : ; . . . . ‘ : . 830
Sale of Real Estate . : ; ‘ : ‘ ‘ 3 : : 833
Sale of Personal Property . : ‘i ‘ : ‘ ie . 834
Scire Facias ‘ : , ‘ 3 3 $ ‘ : ; : 838
Seal 5 é 5 ‘ fi : 5 ‘ a 3 i : . 839
Search-Warrant . Z ‘ F i ; é i i 840
Seduction ‘ ‘ : é : . ‘i ‘ z P ; . 842
Shipping . ‘ 5 ‘ % ‘ ‘ - 5 s i é 843
Sodomy . : ; : F . : ; . ; . x . 843
xiv TABLE OF CONTENTS.
PAGE
Strays : ‘ ij é 3 . . ‘ . . 844
Summary oavictienis. Sie RS RS OR Oe Ce Se
Summonsfor Debt . . . . »© «© «© + © + 851
Sunday . a‘ - - 7 7 6 . 3 : . . 804
Surety of the Pein : 7 : : ‘ ‘ j ‘ : : 858
Swine . . ‘ 7 . 7 . . . ‘i , ; . 860
Telegrams . : . : : . . . . : : . 862
Tender . 3 - ‘ . < A i . . ‘ é . 864
Theatres. . : ‘ ee : : : é si ; 865
Threatening Letters ‘ i ‘ : ‘ . < ‘ . . 868
Timber : x : ‘ ‘ ‘ 2 ‘i : : 3 869
Time. 4 3 ‘ ‘ ‘ 5 ‘ . ‘ : . . 871
Trade-Marks . ‘i ‘ z “ - ‘ : 3 ; : 873
Trades-Unions j ‘i - 5 - 3 é 3 ‘ é . 8i7
Tramps. ‘ i 3 3 6 : ‘ ’ z f 3 879
Transcript . a ‘ : é : F $ . ‘ : . 880
Treason. - 3 - ‘ 5 . “ : - : 882
Trespass and Trover ; : . . : ‘i : : é . 883
Vagrants . ; : ‘ : r : ; ‘ . é ‘ 888
Wagers . é ‘ ‘i ‘ . . : é . ‘ i . 892
Wages : ; ‘ : : 5 : ‘ : ; é 894
Warrant or Capita . z : : : : ; ‘ ; . 899
Weights and Measures : ; : 5 . 3 ; ‘ : 901
Wild Animals : ; : , : ; : : ‘ . . 901
Witnesses . ‘ me 1m ‘ ; : : ; : ; ; 902
APPENDIX.
Code of Criminal Procedure . < z . 7 ‘i A 3 . 903
Naturalization of Aliens. 3 ¥ : : : : ‘ ‘ 923
Authentication of Records . . 3 5 2 : s ‘ . 925
Statute of Fraudulent Conveyances . ‘ ‘ : < ‘ : 927
Rights and Duties of Jurymen , é . 5 j ; : . 929
THE
CONSTITUTION
OF THE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA:
We, Tae PropLe or THE UniTED Srarus,? in order to form a more perfect
anion,’ establish justice, insure domestic tranquillity, provide for the common defence,
promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and
our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of
America®
1 This constitution went into operation on the
first Wednesday in March 1789. 5 Wheat. 420.
2 The constitution was ordained and estab-
lished, not by the states in their sovereign capaci-
ties, but emphatically, as the preamble declares,
by ‘‘the people of the United States.” 1 Wheat.
324. 6 Call 277. It required not the affirmance,
aud could not be negatived by the state govern-
ments. When adopted, it was of complete obliga-
tion, and bound the state sovereignties, 4 Wheat.
404; 6 Id. 414; 2 Dall. 471; which are not inde-
pendent states, with respect to the government of
the United States; but are dependent and subor-
dinate for all the specific purposes for which it
was adopted, The General Parkhill, 19 July 1861,
Pamph.; but retain, in severalty, a distinct but
qualified sovereignty. 3 Bl.C. C. 88. It is not,
however, to be inferred from the language of the
judges of the supreme court, in these cases, that
the preamble to the constitution points to the ma-
jority of the whole people of the United States,
in their aggregate collective capacity, as the ori-
ginal depositary of this power; the true doctrine
would seem to be, that the constitution was
adopted by the people of the several states which
had been previonsly confederated under the name
of the United States, acting through the delegates
by whom they were respectively represented in the
convention which formed the constitution. Bald-
win’s Constitutional Views 29-42. And see 6 Pet.
569, where it is said by McLean, J., to have been
formed “by a combined power exercised by the
people, through their delegates, limited in their
sanctions to the respective states.” See also 2
Wilson’s Works 120. 2 Spr. 602.
8 The union of the states is indissoluble by the
act of any portion of them. 7 Wall. 700. 1 Bond
556. An ordinance of secession is a mere nullity.
6 Wall. 443. The right of secession does not exist
under the constitution; Grier, J., in United States
v. Smith, 21 Oct. 1861. Of the same opinion was
that eminent lawyer and statesman, Judge Black,
a member of President Buchanan’s cabinet, at the
breaking out of the rebellion. But the perpetuity
and indissolubility of the Union by no means im-
plies the loss of distinct and individual existence,
or of the right of self-goveroment by the states;
the constitution looks to an indestructible union,
composed of indestructible states. 7 Wall. 700.
The relation of one of the United States to its cit-
izens is not that of an independent sovereign state
to its subjects; a sovereign state seeking redress
of another sovereign state, on behalf of its sub-
jects, can resort to war on refusal, which a state
cannot do. 108 U.S. 76. The government of the
United States, though limited in its powers, is su-
preme within its sphere of action. 4 Wheat. 405.
1 Bond 556. 100 U.S. 257. Its authority ex-
tends over the whole territory of the Union, act-
ing upon the states, and the people of the states.
Thid.
4 The preamble to the constitution is constantly
referred to, by statesmen and jurists, to aid them
in the exposition of its provisions. See 2 Dall.
475; 12 Wheat. 455-6. 1 Story Const. ch. 6.
5 The United States is a government, and con-
sequently, a body politic and corporate, capable
of attaining the objects for which it was created,
by the means which are necessary for their at-
tainment. 2 Brock. 109, 1 Dall. 44. Through
the instrumentality of the proper department to
which those powers are confided, it may enter into
contracts not prohibited by law, and appropriate
to the just exercise of those powers. 5 Pet. 128.
10 Ibid. 343. 15 Ibid. 290. As a corporation, it
has capacity to sue, by its corporate title. 1
Brock. 177. 3 Wheat. 181. It may compromise
a suit, and receive real and other property in dis-
charge of the debt, in trust, and sell the same.
3 McLean 365. 12 How. 107-8. (15)
16 CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.
ARTICLE I. é
OF THE LEGISLATIVE POWER.
Sxor. I. All legislative powers herein granted, shall be vested in a congress of
the United States, which shall consist of a senate and house of representatives.*
Secr. II. 1. The house of representatives shall be composed of members chosen
every second year by the people of the several states ;? and the electors in each
state shall have the qualifications requisite for electors of the most numerous branch
of the state legislature. :
2. No person shall be a representative who shall not have attained to the age of
twenty-five years, and been seven years a citizen of the United States,® and who
shall not, when elected, be an inhabitant‘ of that state in which he shall be chosen.$
3, Representatives and direct taxes® shall be apportioned among the several
states’ which may be included within this union, according to their respective num-
bers ; which shall be determined by adding to the whole number of free persons, in-
cluding those bound to service for a term of years, and excluding Indians not
taxed, three-fifths of all other persons. The actual enumeration shall be made within
three years after the first meeting of the congress of the United States, and
within every subsequent term of ten years, in such manner as they shall by law
direct. The number of representatives shall not exceed one for every thirty thousand,
but each state shall have at least one representative; and until such enumeration
shall be made, the state of New Hampshire shall be entitled to choose three, Massa--
chusetts eight, Rhode Island and Providence Plantations one, Connecticut five,
New York six, New Jersey four, Pennsylvania eight, Delaware one, Maryland six,
Virginia ten, North Carolina five, South Carolina five, and Georgia three.®
4. When vacancies happen in the representation from any state, the executive
authority thereof shall issue writs of election to fill such vacancies.’
5. The house of representatives shall choose their speaker and other officers ;
and shall have the sole power of impeachment.
Szor. IIT. 1. The senate of the United States shall be composed of two senators
from each state, chosen by the legislature thereof for six years ; and each senator
shall have one vote.
2. Immediately after they shall be assembled, in consequence of the first election,
they shall be divided, as equally as may be, into three classes. The seats of the
senators of the first class shall be vacated at the expiration of the second year, of
the second class, at the expiration of the fourth year, and of the third class, at the
1 See 1 Story Const. ch. 7-8. Alabama. 9 Michigan ~ 12
2 See 1 Cong. Elect. Cas. 69, Arkansas 6 Minnesota . c
3 See Ibid. 23. California 7 Mississippi T
4 See Ibid. 224. An inhabitant of a state, Colorado 2 Missouri if
is one who is ‘bond fide a member of the state, Connecticut . 4 Montana 1
subject to all the requisitions of its laws, and Delaware 1 Nebraska . 6
entitled to all the privileges and advantages Florida 2 Nevada .. 1
which they confer.” 1 Cong. Elect. Cas. 411. Georgia . 11 New Hampshire 2
A person residing in the district of Columbia, Idaho . 1 New Jersey . 8
though in the employment of the general gov- Illinois 22 New York. . 84
ernment, is not an inhabitant of a state, so as Indiana . 13 North Carolina 9
to be eligible to a seat in congress. Ibid. But Towa S28? oat aE Rhode Island 2
a citizen of the United States residing as a Kansas . . . 8 South Carolina 7
public minister at a foreign court, does not lose Kentucky . . 11 South Dakota 2
his character of inhabitant of that state of Louisiana . . 6 Tennessee 10
which he is a citizen, so as to be disqualified for Maine ... 4 Texas . : 13
election to congress. Ibid, 497. Maryland . . 6 Vermont . 2
5 The constitution having fixed the qualifica- Massachusetts . 13 Virginia. : 10
tions of members, no additional qualifications North Dakota . 1 Washington 2
can rightfully be required by the states, 1 Ohio Re ves” sical West Virginia 4
Cong. Elect. Cas. 167, Oregon . . . 1 Wisconsin . 10
6 Direct taxes, within the meaning of the con- Pennsylvania . 30 Wyoming 1
stitution, are only capitation taxes, and taxes as
on real estate, 102 U.S. 586. The following territories of the United States
7 This does not exclude the right to impose a each send one delegate to co iz: -
direct tax on the district of Columbia, in pro- ka, Arizona, New Mexisa, Gkinhows ai ie
portion to the census directed to be taken by the 10 The executive of a state may receive the
constitution. 5 Wheat. 317. resignation of » member, and issue writs for a
® Altered by the 14th amendment. new election, without waiting to be informed b
‘9 Under the eleventh census, the states are the house that a vacanoy exists. 1 Con Elect,
entitled to the following representation in con- Cas. 44. Ibid. 92. e .
gress, viz.:
CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES. 17
expiration of the sixth year, so that one-third may be chosen every second year}
and if vacancies happen by resignation? or otherwise, during the recess of the leg-
islature of any state, the executive thereof may make temporary appointments®
until the next meeting of the legislature, which shall then fill such vacancies.
3. No person shall be a senator who shall not have attained the age of thirty
years, and been nine years a citizen of the United States, and who shall not, when
elected, be an inhabitant of that state for which he shall be chosen.
4. The vice-president of the United States shall be president of the senate,5 but
shall have no vote, unless they be equally divided.
_ 5. The senate shall choose their other officers, and also a president pro tempore
in the absence of the vice-president, or when he shall exercise the office of president
of the United States.
6. The senate shall have the sole power to try all impeachments,
for that purpose, they shall be on oath or affirmation. When the president of the
United States is tried, the chief justice shall preside 3° and no person shall be con-
victed without the concurrence of two-thirds of the members present.’
7. Judgment in cases of impeachment shall not extend further than to removal
from office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any office of honor, trust or profit,
under the United States; but the party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and
subject to indictment, trial, judgment and punishment, according to law.
Sscr. IV. 1. The times, places and manner of holding elections for senators and
representatives, shall be prescribed in each state by the legislature thereof ;® but
the congress may at any time, by law, make or alter such regulations, except as
to the places of choosing senators.
2. The congress shall assemble at least once in every year ; and such meeting
shall be on the first Monday in December, unless they shall, by law, appoint a
different day.
Szor. V. 1. Hach house shall be the judge of the election, returns and qualifi-
cations of its own members,” and a majority of each shall constitute a quorum to
do business; but a smaller number may adjourn from day to day, and may be
authorized to compel the attendance of absent members, in such manner, and under
such penalties as each house may provide.
When sitting
2, Hach house may determine the rules of its proceedings, punish its members”
1 The senate is a permanent body; its exist-
ence is continued and perpetual. Cushing’s Law
of Legislative Assemblies 19.
2 The seat of a senator is vacated by a resigna-
tion addressed to the executive of the state, not-
withstanding he may have received no notice that
his resignation has been accepted. 1 Cong. Elect.
Cas. 869.
5 It is not competent for the executive of a
state, during the recess of the legislature, to
appoint a serator, to fill a vacancy which shad/
hoppen, but has not happened, at the time of the
appointment. 1 Cong. Hlect. Cas. 871. Andifa
vacancy occur, during the recess of the legislature,
which subsequently assembles, and adjourns with-
out electing a person to fill the vacancy, it is not
competent for the governor to appoint, during the
recess following such adjournment. Ibid. 874.
£ See 1 Cong. Elect. Cas. 851.
5 See 1 Story Const. 3739.
6 When the chief justice presides in the senate,
on the impeachment of the president, he is a con-
stituent member of the court, and has a right to
vote as such. 1 Johns, Trial 185, 187. 8 Cow.
398. Ibid. 761. 2 Wend. 213.
7 A judgment of impeachment in the English
house of lords, requires that at least twelve of the
members should concurinit. And “a verdict by
less than twelve would not be good.” Com. Dig.
Parliament, L. 17.
8 Where the legislature of a state have failed to
* prescribe the times, places and manner” of hold-
ing elections, as required by the constitution, the
governor may, in case of a vacancy, in his writ
of election, give notice of the time and place of
election ; but a reasonable time ought to be al-
lowed for the promulgation of the notice. 1 Cong.
Elect. Cas. 135.
® In the exercise of such supervisory power,
congress may impose new duties on the officers of
election, or additional penalties for breach of duty,
or for the perpetration of fraud; or provide for
the attendance of officers to prevent frauds, and
see that the elections are legally and fairly con-
ducted. 100 U.S. 372. Ibid. 399. 109 Ibid. 3.
Ibid. 65. 4 Woods 189. See 1 R.S. 3 15-19, for
the mode of electing senators, By % 23, members
of the house of representatives are to be elected
by single districts.
10 The constitutional term of congress does not
expire until 12 o’clock at noon on the 4 March,
11 Stat. App’x, ii.
11 The returns from the state authorities are
prima facie evidence only of an election, and are
not conclusive upon the house. 1 Cong. Elect.
Cas. 157. Ibid. 353. And the refusal of the
executive of a state to grant a certificate of elec-
tion, does not prejudice the right of one who may
be entitled to a seat. Ibid. 95.
12 [twas decided in 103 U.S. 168, that no mere
legisiative body, without judicial powers, can
convict for a contempt, one who is neither a mem-
ber nor an officer of the house ; citing, 1 Moo. P. C.
63, where it was determined by the judicial com-
mittee of the privy council, that no such power
was possessed by the legislative assembly of New-
foundland ; and the older cases to the contrary
were overruled. The same point was re-affirmed,
in 11 Moo. P. C. 347, and 4 Moo. P. C. (N. 8.)
770. See also, 14 Gray 226.
18 CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.
for disorderly behavior, and with the concurrence of two-thirds, expel a mem-
ber. :
3. Hach house shall keep a journal of its proceedings, and from time to time
publish the same, excepting such parts as may, in their judgment, require secrecy ;
and the yeas and nays of the members of either house, on any question, shall, at
the desire of one-fifth of those present, be entered on the journal.
4. Neither house, during the session of congress, shall, without the consent of
the other, adjourn for more than three days, nor to any other place than that in
which the two houses shall be sitting. ;
Sect. VI. 1. The senators and representatives shall receive a compensation for
their services, to be ascertained by law, and paid out of the treasury of the United
States. They shall, in all cases, except treason, felony and breach of the peace,?
be privileged from arrest,* during their attendance at the session of their respective
houses, and in going to, and returning from, the same ;* and for any speech or
debate in either house, they shall not be questioned in any other place.
2. No senator or representative shall, during the time for which he was elected,
be appointed to any civil office’ under the authority of the United States, which
shall have been created, or the emoluments whereof shall have been increased,
during such time; and no person holding any office under the United States, shall
be a member of either house during his continuance in office.®
Sxor. VII. 1. All bills for raising revenue shall originate in the house of repre-
sentatives; but the senate may propose or concur with amendments as on other
bills.
2. Every bill which shall have passed the house of representatives and the
senate, shall, before it become a law be presented to the president of the United
States; if he approve, he shall sign it,’ but if not, he shall return it, with
his objections, to that house in which it shall have originated, who shall enter the
objections at large on their journal, and proceed to reconsider it. If, after recon-
sideration, two-thirds® of that house shall agree to pass the bill, it shall be sent,
together with the objections, to the other house, by which it shall likewise be
reconsidered, and if approved by two-thirds of that house, it shall become a law.
But in all such cases, the votes of both houses shall be determined by yeas and
nays, and the names of the persons voting for and against the bill shall be entered
on the journal of each house respectively. If any bill shall not be returned by
the president within ten days (Sundays excepted), after it shall have been presented
to him, the same shall be a law, in like manner as if he had signed it, unless the
1 It seems to be settled, that a member may be
expelled for any misdemeanor, which, though not
punishable by any statute, is inconsistent with
the trust and duty of a member. Blount’s Case,
cited 1 Story Const. 3 838. And see 1 Hall L. J.
459.
2 This would seem to extend to all indictable
offences, as well those which are in fact attended
with force and violence, as those which are only
constructive breaches of the peace of the govern-
ment, inasmuch as they violate its good order.
1 Bl. Com. 166. 1 Story Const. 3 865. But see 4
W N.C. 540.
8 They are privileged not only from arrest both
on judicial and mesne process, but also from the
service of a summons or other civil process while
in attendance on their public duties. 4 Dall.
107. 1 Wall. Jr. C. C. 191. 1 Story Const. 2 860.
See 3 Dall. 478. 4 Ibid. 341. 4 Y¥. 347. Contra,
1 Chicago Leg. News 245.
4 They are privileged only while at congress, or
actually going to, or returning thorefrom. 2 Johns.
Cas. 222. Seo 1 Ibid. 415. 4 Wond. 204. 4 Y.
847. But one who goes to Washington, duly com-
missioned to represent a state in congress, is privi-
leged from arrest, eundo, morando et redeundo,
and though it be subsequently decided by congress
that he is not entitled to a seat there, he is pro-
tected, until he reaches home, if he return as soon
as possible after such decision, 2 Clark 450. 8
Rh. I. 453.
5 The acceptance by a member of any office
under the United States, after he has been elected
to, and taken his seat in, congress, operates as &
forfeiture of his seat. 1 Cong. Elect. Cas. 122.
So does the acceptance of a military commission
in a volunteer regiment mustered into the service
of the United States. 2 Ibid. 93. -Ibid. 395.
§ Continuing to execute the duties of an office
under the United States, after one is elected to
congress, but before he takes his seat, is not a dis-
qualification ; such office being resigned prior to
the taking of the seat. 1 Cong. Elect. Cas. 287.
Ibid. 314. Ibid. 316.
7 Every bill takes effect as a law, from the time
when it is approved by the president, and then its
effect is prospective and not retrospective. The
doctrine that, in law, there is no fraction of a day,
is a mere legal fiction, and has no application in
such a case. 2 Story 571. 1 Cal. 400. But
Has is denied to be law. 20 Vt. 653. 21 Ibid.
8 On the 7th July 1856, the senate of the United
States decided, by a vote of thirty-four to seven,
that two-thirds of a quorum only were requisite
to pass a bilk over the president’s veto, and not
two-thirds of the whole senate. 9 Law Rep. 196.
In tho ratification of treaties, it is expressly pro-
vided, that two-thirds of the senators present shall
concur. And see Cushing’s Law of Legislative
Assemblies, 2 2387. 9 Opin. 410.
CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES,
19
congress, by their adjournment, prevent its return, in which case, it shall not be a
law.
3. Every order, resolution,! or vote, to which the concurrence of the senate
and house of representatives may be necessary (except on a question of adjourn-
ment), shall be presented to the president of the United States: and-before the
same shall take effect, shall be approved by him, or being disapproved by him,
shall be re-passed by two-thirds of the senate and house of representatives, accord.
ing to the rules and limitations prescribed in the case of a bill.
Szor. VIII. 1. The congress shall have power—
2. To lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts and excises,? to pay the debts and
provide for the common defence and general welfare of the United States ;? but all
duties, imposts and excises shall be uniform throughout the United States :
3. To borrow money on the credit of the United States :4
4. To regulate commerce® with foreign nations,® and among the several states,’
1 A joint resolution, phpnored by the president,
or duly passed without his approval, has all the
effect of law. But separate resolutions of either
house of congress, except in matters appertaining
to their own parliamentary rights, have no legal
effect to constrain the action of the president or
of the heads of departments. 6 Opin. 680.
2 The power to levy and collect taxes, duties,
imposts and excises, is co-extensive with the terri-
tory of the United States. 5 Wheat. 317. And
see 11 Wall. 616.
3 Congress is not empowered to tax for those
purposes which are within the exclusive province
of the states. 9 Wheat. 199. A tax fora private
purpose is unconstitutional; a public use or pur-
pose is essential to the idea of tax. 25 Wis. 167.
4 The states have no power to tax the loans of
the United States. 2 Pet. 449,465. 2 Bl. 620.
2 Wall. 200. 4 McLean 26. Nor an officer of the
United States for his office oremoluments. 16 Pet.
435. See 9 Law Rep. 110. But congress has no
power to exempt property from taxation, unless
it be made so by the constitution. 37 N. Y. 9.
5 The power of congress to regulate commerce
is exclusive, at least, in all cases where the sub-
jects over which it is exercised are, in their
nature, national, or admit of one uniform system
or plan of regulation, 5 McCrary 496; and for
that purpose it reaches the interior of every state
of the Union. 100 U.S. 434. This power, like
all others vested in congress, is complete in itself,
may be exercised to its utmost extent, and acknow-
ledges no limitations other than are prescribed in
the constitution. 9 Wheat. 196. See 9 Sawyer
253. Commerce with foreign nations, and among
the several states, can mean nothing more than
intercourse with those nations, and among those
states, for the purposes of trade, be the object of
the trade what it may ; and this intercourse must
include all the means by which it can be carried
on, whether by the free navigation of the waters
of the several states, or by a passage over-land
through the states, where such passage becomes
necessary to the commercial intercourse between
the states. 4 W. C. C. 378. 18 How. 421. 6
MeLean 70. Ibid. 209. Ibid. 237. Ibid. 518.
6 Wall. 35. 10 Ibid. 454; 16 Am. L. Reg. 149.
See 3 Gr. 128. This clause confers the power to
impose embargoes. 9 Wheat. 191, 2 Hall L. J.
255, 272. To punish crimes upon stranded vessels.
12 Pet. 72. And to prohibit the slave crade.
United States v. Bates, Pamph. 129. It does not,
however, interfere with the right of the several
states to enact inspection, quarantine and health
laws of every description, as well as laws for reg-
ulating their internal commerce. 9 Wheat. 203.
11 Pet. 102. 28 Ala. 185. 118.& R. 92. 13
Ibid. 405. Nor with their power to regulate pilots.
12 How. 299. 13 Wall. 236. 13 W. N. C. 63.
102 U. S. 572. 9 Fed. Rep. 164. 12 Ibid. 346.
16 Ibid. 480. Nor to protect their fisheries. 18
How. 71. 94 U.S. 391. 3 Gray 268.
6 A state law which requires the masters of ves-
sels engaged in foreign commerce to pay a certain
sum to a state officer, on account of every passen-
ger brought from a foreign country into the state,
or before landing any alien passenger in the
state conflicts with the constitution and laws of the
United States. 7 How. 283. And see 6 Wall. 31.
92 U. 8. 259. Ibid. 275. 107 Ibid. 59. 112
Ibid. 580. 6 Sawyer 640. So does a state law
authorizing the seizure and imprisonment of free
negroes brought inte any port of the state, on
board of any vessel from any other state or foreign
port. 2 Wh. Cr. Cas. 56. 1 Spr. 88. Ibid. 485.
1 Opin. 659. And so does a state law which re-
quires an importer to take a license and pay $50,
before he should be permitted to sella package of
imported goods. 12 Wheat. 419. See 97 U.S.
566. 13 5. & R. 405. Buta state law imposing
a tax on brokers dealing in foreign exchange is
not repugnant to this clause of the constitution.
8 How. 73. Noris one imposing a tax on legacies
payable to aliens. 8 Ibid. 490. Nor are the
license laws of certain states, forbidding the sale
of spirituous liquors, under less than certain large
quantities. 5 Ibid. 504. 2 Houst. 612. See 4
Cal. 46-7. Nora law imposing a license tax upon
all drummers or travelling agents. 6 Sawyer 295.
100 U. S. 676. Otherwise, if it discriminate
against non-residents. 15 Fed. Rep.311. 12 Wall.
418. 91 U.S. 275. 100 Ibid. 434. 116 Ibid. 446,
7 The non-exercise by congress of its power to
regulate commerce among the several states, is
equivalent to a declaration that it shall be free
from any restrictions. 91 U.S. 275. Congress
have power to prevent the obstruction of any
navigable river, which is a means of commerce
between any two or more states, 5 McLean 426.
6 Ibid. 237. 3 Am. L. Reg. 79. 1 Biss. 546. But
a court of the United States has no power to re-
strain, by injunction, the erection of a bridge
over a navigable river, lying wholly within the
limits of a particular state, when such erection is
authorized by the-legislature of the state; though
a port of entry has been created by congress
above the bridge. 6 Am. L. Reg. 6. And see 3
Wall. 713. 95 U.S.459. 1 Biss. 546. to
be confronted with the witnesses against him;® to have compulsory process for
obtaining witnesses in his favor;’ and to have the assistance of counsel for his
defence.
Art. VII. In suits at common law,® where the value in controversy shall exceed
twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved ;® and no fact tried by
a jury shall be otherwise re-examined,” in any court of the United States, than
according to the rules of the common law.”
Arr. VIII. Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed,4
nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.
Art. LX. The enumeration in the constitution of certain rights shall not be con-
strued to deny or disparage others retained by the people."#
Art. X. The powers not delegated to the United States by the constitution,
nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively or to the
people.
Art. XI. The judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to
extend to any suit in law or equity,!* commenced or prosecuted against one of the
United States,” by citizens of another state, or by citizens or subjects of any foreign
state.1¢
1 See 18 How. 276. This implies the right to
notice to appear and answer, and to a remedy in
court. 16 Penn. St. 257. And see 34 Ibid. 292.
2 This provision is only a limitation of the
power of the general government ; it has no appli-
cation to the legislation of the several states. 7
Pet. 243. Bald. 220. It is now settled, that the
amendments to the constitution do not extend to
the states. 7 Pet. 551. They are exclusively
restrictions upon federal power, intended to pre-
vent interference with the rights of the states, and
of their citizens. 5 How. 434. 12 S. & R. 221.
3 Cow. 686. 20 How. 84. 1 McAll. 212. 5 Wall.
476. 7 Ibid. 321.
3 This is only to be intended of those crimes,
which, by our former laws and customs, had been
tried by jury. Wall. C. C. 106.
4 It must have been ascertained by law, previ-
ously to the commission of the crime, not merely
previously to the trial. 5 BI. C. C. 360.
5 This does not entitle him to a copy of the
indictment, at the expense of the government. 4
Bl. C. C. 337.
6 This isa privilege that pertains to the trial
in court, not to the preliminary proceedings. 2
Story Const. 3 1785-6. United States v. Bates,
Pamph. p. 46. e
7 Any person charged with a crime in the courts
of the United States, has a right, before, as well
as after indictment, to the process of the court to
-ompel the attendance of his witnesses. 1 Burr’s
Trial 179-80.
® This includes not merely modes of proceeding
Known to the common law, but all suits, not of
equity or admiralty jurisdiction, in which legal
rights are settled and determined. 3 Pet. 433.
3 Dall. 297, 11 How. 437. Bald. 544. It does
not apply to a motion for summary relief. 24
Penn. St. 289. See 2 Fish. 642.
® The guarantee of trial by jury is intended as
well for a state of war, asa state of peace; and
is equally binding upon rulers and people, at all
times and under all circumstances. 4 Wall. 3.
The right to trial by jury is for the benefit of the
parties litigating, and may be waived by them.
2 Paine 578. 3 Pet. 413. But the circuit courts
have no arn to order a peremptory nonsuit,
against the will of the plaintiff. 1 Pet. 469. Ibid.
476. 6 Ibid. 598. Hemp. 8. 23 How. 172. The
7th amendment applies only to the courts of the
United States. 95 U.S. 294. \
10 See 2 Cr. C. 0. 515. Ibid. 523. After a trial
by jury, ina state court, it is not competent to
remove the cause for a retrial on the merits in a
federal court. 9 Wall. 274.
11 The common law here alluded to, is not the
common Jaw of any individual state, but the com-
mon law of England; according to which, facts
once tried by a jury are never re-examined, unless
a new trial be granted, iv the discretion of the
court before which the suit is depending, for good
cause shown; or unless the judgment of such court
be reversed by a superior tribunal, on a writ of
error, and a venire facias de novo awarded. 1 Gall.
20
12 See 7 Pet. 573-4.
18 The disfranchisement of a citizen is not an
unusual punishment. 20 Johns. 459. 53 Penn. St.
112. The punishments of whipping and of stand-
ing in the pillory, were abolished by act 28 Feb-
ruary 1839, 25. 5 Stat. 322. See 12 8. & R.
220.
14 See 1 Story Const. 3 447. 1 W. & M. 401.
3S. & R. 169.
16 See 1 McLean 234. The rule of interpreta-
tion for a state constitution differs totally from
that which is applicable to the constitution of the
United States. The latter instrument must have
a strict construction; the former a liberal one.
Congress can pass no laws but those which the
constitution authorizes, either expressly, or by
clear implication ; while the state legislature has
jurisdiction of all subjects in which its legislation
is not prohibited. 17 Penn. St.119. 52 Ibid. 474.
16 Tt does not extend to suits of admiralty or
maritime jurisdiction. Bright. 9. See 7 Pet.
7.
11 Tf the state be not necessarily a defendant,
though its interests may be affected by the decis-
ion, the courts of the United States are bound to
exercise jurisdiction. 2 How. 550. 5 Cr. 115.
Otherwise, if the state be an indispensable party.
109 U.S. 446.
18 A state, by becoming interested with others
34 CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITHD Sitaino,
Art. XII. 1. The electors shall meet in their respective states, and vote by bal
lot for president and vice-president, one of whom, at least, shall not be an inhabitant
of the same state with themselves; they shall name in their ballots the person
voted for as president, and in distinct ballots, the person voted for as vice-president;
and they shall make distinct lists of all persons voted for as president, and of all
persons voted for as vice-president, and of the number of votes for each, which list
they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed? to the seat of the government of
the United States, directed to the president of the senate; the president of the
senate shall, in the presence of the senate and house of representatives, open all
the certificates,’ and the votes shall then be counted ;* the person having the greatest
number of votes for president shall be the president, if such number be a majority
of the whole number of electors appointed ; and if no person have such majority, then
from the persons having the highest numbers, not exceeding three, on the list of
those voted for as president, the house of represevtatives shall choose immediately
by ballot the president.6 But in choosing the president, the votes shall be taken by
states, the representation from each state having one vote: a quorum for this
purpose shall consist of a member or members from two-thirds of the states, and
a majority of all the states shall be necessary to a choice. And if the house of
representatives shall not choose a president, whenever the right of choice shall
devolve upon them, before the fourth day of March next following, then the vice-
president shall act as president, as in the case of the death or other constitutional
disability of the president.
2. The person having the greatest number of votes as vice-president shall be the
vice-president, if such number be a majority of the whole number of electors ap-
pointed: and if no person have a majority, then from the two highest numbers on
the list, the senate shall choose the vice-president ; a quorum for the purpose shall
consist of two-thirds of the whole number of senators, and a majority of the whole
number shall be necessary to a choice.
3. But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of president shall be
eligible to that of vice-president of the United States.
Ant. XIII. 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punish-
ment for crime, whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist
within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.®
2. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
Arr. XIV. 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject
to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein
they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privi-
leges or immunities of citizens of the United States ;’ nor shall any state deprive
in a banking or trading corporation, or by own- Chase’s Dec. 364. And this led to the passage of
ing all the capital stock, does not impart to that
corporation any of its privileges or prerogatives ;
it lays down its sovereignty so far as respects the
transactions of the corporation, and exercises no
power or privilege in respect to those transac-
tions not derived from the charter. 8 Wheat. 904.
8 Pet. 431. 11 Ibid. 324. 2 How. 497. 13 Ibid. 12.
15 Ibid. 309. And see 6 Wheat. 264. 108 U.S.
76.
1 On the first Wednesday in December, 1 R. 5S.
140.
é 2 Before the first Wednesday in January,
1B. S. 3 140.
8 On the second Wednesday in February,
IRS. 3 142.
4 The constitution does not provide by whom
the votes shall be counted.
5 Ona motion to discharge a defendant arrested
upon a ecapias ad respondendum, by a marshal
appointed by the president de facto of the United
States, the court will not decide the question
whether he has been duly elected to that office.
8 Cr. 0. C. 424,
6 See 92 U.S. 543. 1 Woods 208.
7 It was determined at an carly day (1869),
that this amendmont did not execute itself, but
required legislation on the part of congress.
the civil rights act of the 1st March 1875 (18 Stat.
395). Under the 4th section of this act, it has
been determined, that the amendment not only
gave the privileges of citizenship to the colored
race, but denied to any state the power to with-
hold from them the equal protection of the laws,
and invested congress with power to enforce its
provisions ; consequently, that a state Jaw which
denied to them the right of serving as jurors,
though qualified in other respects, was a violation
of the constitution. 100 U.S. 303. And that an
indictment will lie against a state officer, for ex-
cluding persons of color from the jury list. Ibid.
339. A state law confining the selection of jurors
to persons possessing the qualifications of electors,
was enlarged in its operation, by the 15th amen2
sent, so as to embraco persons of the negro race.
103 U.S. 370. But the prohibitions of the 14th
amendment havo exclusive reference to state
action ; +t is the state which is prohibited from
denying to any person within its jurisdiction the
equal protection of the laws; tho federal statute
was intended to protect the colored race against
stato action, and against that alone. 100 U.S.
313. 103 Ibid, 370. 107 Thid. 110. 13 Fed. Ren.
337. 12 Ibid. 577, And as a consequenre of thir
doctrine, it has been determined, that the first
CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES. 35
any person of life, liberty or property, without due process of law, nor deny to any
person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.?
2. Representatives shall he apportioned among the several states, according
to their respective numbers, excluding Indians not taxed; but when the right to
vote at any election for the choice of electors for president and vice-president of the
United States, representatives in congress, the executive and judicial officers of a
state, or the members of the legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhab-
itants of such state, being of twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United
States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion or other crime,
the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the
number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens,
twenty-one years of age, in such state.
3. No person shall be a senator or representative in congress, or elector of presi-
dent and vice-president, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United
States, or under any state, who having previously taken an oath, as a member of
congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any state legislature,
or as an executive or judicial officer of any state, to support the constitution of the
United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same,
or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof; but congress may, by a vote of
two-thirds of each house, remove such disability.
4. The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law,
including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in su
pressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United
States nor any state shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid
of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or
emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held
illegal and void.
5. The congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the pro-
visions of this article.
Art, XV. 1. The right of citizens of the United States to vote, shall not be
and second sections of the civil rights act, which
forbid the denial to persons of color of equal
accommodations in inns, public conveyances and
places of amusement, are unconstitutional, as not
within the power of congress. 4 Woods 349. 109
U.S. 3. Judge Bradley there says, “ the impli-
cation of a power to legislate in this manner is
based upon the assumption, that if the states are
forbidden to legislate or act in a particular way,
on @ particular subject, and power is conferred
upon congress to enforce the prohibition, this
gives congress power to legislate generally upon
that subject, and not merely power to provide
means of redress against such state legislation or
action. This assumption is certainly unsound. It
is sepugnant to the 10th amendment to the consti-
tation, which declares, that powers not delegated to
the United States by the constitution, nor prohi-
bited by it to the states, are reserved to the states,
respectively, or to the people.” A state law which
prohibits a white person and a negro from living
together in coneubinage is not unconstitutional,
though it prescribes penalties more severe, than if
both were of the same race. 106 U.S. 583. 1 Woods
537. 3 Ibid. 337. 24 Alb. L. J. 118. 53 Ala.
150. 58 Ibid. 190. 3 Hughes 9. Neither does
the amendment prevent a state from establishing
one system of law, in one portion of its territory,
and another system, in another portion. 101
U. 8. 22. Personal rights of state citizenship,
such as those of attendance at the public schools,
are not within the 14th amendment. 93 N.Y.
438. 10 Fed. Rep. 730. 21 Ohio St.129. 48
Ind. 327. 48 Cal. 36. Anda common carrier of
passengers, independently of state legislation, has
the right to make a regulation for the separation
of negro and white passengers in a public convey-
ance. 55 Penn. St. 209. 22 Fed. Rep. 843. 23
‘Ibid. 318, 637. The right to sell intoxicating
liquors is not one of the privileges secured by
this clause. 18 Wall. 129. 97 U. S. 25. 112
Ibid. 201.
1 Where a statute of limitation has run against
a claim for a personal debt, a repeal thereof,
thereby removing the bar, and revesting the right
of action in the creditor, is not a violation of this
clause; it is otherwise, where the statute has
vested the title to real or personal property in the
possessor. 115 U.S. 620.
2 This is a guarantee against any encroachment
upon an acknowledged right of citizenship, by
the legislatures of the states. 94 U.S. 124. The
term, ‘‘ due process of law,” when applied to judi-
cial proceedings, means a course of legal proceed-
ings according to those rules and principles which
have been established by our jurisprudence for
the protection and enforcement of private rights ;
to give such proceedings any validity, there must
be a competent tribunal, to pass upon the subject-
maiter; and if that involves merely a determina-
tion of the personal liability of the defendant, he
must be brought within its jurisdiction by service
of process within the state, or by his voluntary
appearance. 95 U.S. 714. 96 Ibid. 97. A trial
by jury, in suits at common law, pending in the
state courts, is not a privilege or immunity of
national citizenship, which the states are forbidden
to abridge. 92 U. S.90. Nor does this clause
necessarily require an indictment by a grand jury,
in a prosecution for a capital offence. 110 U.S.
516. See 109 Ibid. 285. 16 Wall. 36. It does
not impair the police power of a state. 113 U.
§. 27. But it prohibits unequal taxation. 9 Saw-
yer 165. See 118 U.S. 356.
36
CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.
denied or abridged by the United States, or by any state, on account of race, color
or previous condition of servitude.?
2. The congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legisla-
tion.
1 The 15th amendment does not confer upon the
negro the right of suffrage; but it secures him
from discrimination in the exercise of the elective
franchise, on account of race, color, &e. 92 U.
8. 214. The right to vote comes from the states;
but the right of exemption from the prohibited
discrimination comes from the United States ; the
first has not been granted or secured by the con-
stitution, but the last has been. 92 U. S. 542.
And see 10 Biss. 283. 110 U.S. 651. The 14th
and 15th amendments do not confer the elective
franchise upon women. 11 Bl. C. C.200. 53 Mo.
58. 1 McArthur 169. 8 Phila. 241. 4 Chicago
Leg. News 97. So also, an Indian, born a mem-
ber of one of the Indian tribes, which still exists
and is recognised as a tribe by the federal gov-
ernment, who has voluntarily separated himself
from his tribe, and taken up his residence among
the white citizens of a state, but who has not been
naturalized, nor taxed or recognised as a citizen,
either by the United States, or by the state, is not
a citizen within the meaning of the 14th amend-
ment, and consequently not entitled to the right
of suffrage, under the 15th amendment. 112
U.S. 94. In this case, there was a strong dis-
senting opinion by Justices Harlan and Woods,
On this question, see the opinion of Chief Justice
Gibson, on the subject of negro suffrage in Penn-
sylvania, prior to the adoption of the 15th amend-
ment, in 6 W. 553; and that of Judge Fox in the
court below, in the pamphlet report of that case.
But a person born in the United States of Chinese
Po residing therein, is a citizen. 21 Fed.
ep. 905.
THE
CONSTITUTION
OF THE
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA.
1874.
PREAMBLE.
Wz, the People of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, grateful to Almighty «od
for the blessings of civil and religious liberty, and humbly invoking His guidance,
do ordain and establish this constitution.*
ARTICLE I.
DECLARATION OF RIGHTS.
That the general, great and essential principles of liberty and free government
may be recognised and unalterably established, WE DECLARE, that—
Srcr. 1. All men are born equally free and independent, and have certain inhe-
rent and indefeasible rights, among which are those of enjoying and defending
life and liberty, of acquiring, possessing and protecting property and reputation,
and of pursuing their own happiness.?
Sror. 2. All power is inherent in the people, and all free governments are
founded on their authority, and instituted for their peace, safety and happiness. For
the advancement of those ends, they have, at all times, an inalienable and inde-
feasible right to alter, reform or abolish their government, in such manner as they
may think proper.
Srot. 3. All men have a natural and indefeasible right to worship Almighty
God according to the dictates of their own consciences ;° no man can, of right, be
compelled to attend, erect or support any place of worship, or to maintain any
ministry, against his consent; no human authority can, in any case whatever, con-
trol or interfere with the rights of conscience :* and no preference shall ever be
given, by law, to any religious establishments or modes of worship.
Pennsylvania; not Christianity founded on any
particular religious tenets, but Christianity with
liberty of conscience to all men. 118. & R. 394,
400. 6 Penn. St. 96. 8 Ibid. 327. 11 Leg. Int.
1 The object of the constitution is not to grant
legislative power, but to confine and restrain it.
Without the constitutional limitations, the power
of the legislature to make laws would be absolute.
1P.& W. 13.
15 N. Y. 549. 46 Ibid. 401. 6 W.& 8.117. The
tule of interpretation for the state constitution
differs totally from that which is applicable to the
eonstitution of the United States. The latter
instrument must have a strict construction; the
former, a liberal one. Congress can pass no laws
but those which the constitution authorizes, either
expressly or by clear implication; whilst the as-
sembly has jurisdiction of all subjects on which
sts legislation is not prohibited. 17 Penn. St.119.
@1 Ibid. 160. 52 [bid. 474.
2 See 21 Penn. St. 147.
5 Christianity is a part of the common law of
14. See 2 Story Const. 3 1871.
2 How. 199. 33 Barb. 548. 63 Penn. St. 465,
Every religious society, for its own internal order,
and for the mode in which it fulfils its functions,
is a law unto itself, provided it keep withia the
bounds of social order and morality. 41 Penn.
St. 14. 42 Ibid.503. 69 Ibid. 462. 89 Ibid. 97,
101 Ibid. 363.
4 Those who keep the seventh day as their Sab-
bath, may be punished for working on Sunday.
38. & BR. 48. 8 Penn. St. 322. 21 Ibid. 426. And
see 22 Ibid. 114; 11 Leg. Int. 14. 17 8.& R.
160.
(37)
88 CONSTITUTION OF PENNSYLVANIA.
Szor. 4. No person who acknowledges the being of a God, and a future state
of rewards and punishments, shall, on account of his religious sentiments, be ce
qualified to hold any office, or place of trust or profit, under this commonwealth.
Sxot. 5. Elections shall be free and equal; and no power, civil or military, shall
at any time, interfere to prevent the free exercise of the right of suffrage. ;
Sect. 6. Trial by jury shall be as heretofore,? and the right thereof remain
inviolate?
Sgor. 7. The printing press shall be free* to every person who may undertake
to examine the proceedings of the legislature, or any branch of government, and
no law shall ever be made to restrain the right thereof. The free communication of
thoughts and opinions is one of the invaluable rights of man ; and every citizen
may freely speak, write and print on any subject, being responsible for the abuse of
that liberty. No conviction shall be had, in any prosecution for the publication
of papers relating to the official conduct of officers, or men in public capacity, cr to
any other matter proper for public investigation or information,’ where the fact that
such publication was not maliciously or negligently made, shall be established to the
satisfaction of the jury; and in all indictments for libels, the jury shall have
the right to determine the law and the facts, under the direction of the court, as
in other cases.
Sect. 8. The people shall be secure in their pérsons, houses, papers and posses-
sions, from unreasonable searches and seizures ; and no warrant to search any place,
or to seize any person or things, shall issue, without describing them as nearly as
may be, nor without probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, subscribed
to by the affiant.”
Sscr. 9. In all criminal prosecutions, the accused hath a right to be heard by
himself and his counsel,® to demand the nature and cause of the accusation against
him,® to meet the witnesses face to face, to have compulsory process for obtaining
witnesses in his favor; and in prosecutions by indictment or information, a speedy
public trial, by an impartial jury of the vicinage ; he cannot be compelled to give
1 The test of competency is, whether the party
believe in the existence of a God, who will punish
him, if he swear falsely. 2 W. & S. 262. 26 Penn.
St. 274. 2 Cow. 431.
2 This does not interfere with the summary
conviction of rogues and vagabonds. 42 Penn.
St. 89. And see 51 Ibid. 96; Ibid. 412. 29 Pitts.
L. J. 414. 30 Ibid. 14. It is error, if it do not
appear, by the record of the trial of an indictment,
that the defendant was tried by twelve jurors,
lawfully sworn, 38. & R. 237. A waiver of thiy
right, by the consent of the defendant, in a crim-
inal case, is a nullity. 1 Pitts.492. 18 N.Y. 129.
The 37th section of the code of criminal proced-
ure, giving the commonwealth four peremptory
challenges, does not conflict with this provision.
37 Penn. St. 45. 40 Ibid. 462.
3 See 1 Binn. 424. 5 Penn. St. 204. 7 Pet.
551-2. Trial by jury is a constitutional right,
which cannot be waived by implication. 6 W.
133. 31 Penn. St. 310. 18N. ¥. 129. The leg-
islature has no power, either to provide that a
petit jury may be composed of a less number than
twelve, or that a number of the petit jury, less
than twelve, may render a verdict. 23 Law. Rep.
458. 1 Moxrtana 118. Ibid. 200. 10 Phila. 496.
37 Hew, Pr. 140. But the act of 1861, which pro-
vides that certain offences may, at the election of
the defendant, be tried by a justice and six jurors,
is not unconstitutional. 101 Penn. St. 560. A
municipal corporation, being the creature of the
legislature, cannot claim the constitutional right
of atrial by jury. 52 Penn. St. 374,
41 Dall.325. 3 Y.520. 4 Ibid. 269. 1 Browst.
492.
5 4 Y. 267. 3 Pitts, 449.
6 The new constitution has introduced an
entirely new principle into the law of libel in this
state, to wit, that where tho matter complained of
is proper for publication, and it is established,
that it was published without negligence or malice,
a criminal prosecution cannot be maintained. 11
Phila. 469. 7 Luz. L. Reg. 39, 44. And see
11 Phila. 287. There must be proof of malice or
negligence, to convict of libel, where the publica~
tion relates to the official conduct of persons ins
public capacity. 15 Phila, 469. And see 40 Leg.
Int. 446.
7 A warrant of arrest, issued upon common
rumor and report cf the party’s guilt, though it
recite that there is danger of his escaping, before
witnesses could be summoned, to enable the judge
to issue it upon oath, is illegal; and no officer is
bound to execute it. 3 Binn. 38. But an arrest
for felony may be made without warrant. 6 Ibid.
316. And if a justice of the peace be obstructed
in the performance of his judicial duties, he may
commit the offender for trial, or hold him to bail,
without oath or hearing. 2 Chest. Co. R. 557.
As to the sufficiency of a search-warrant, see 10
W. N.C. 135,
8 It need not appear by the record, that the
prisoner was allowed counsel. 37 Penn. St. 108.
® The 2%th section of the code of criminal pro-
cedure of 31 March 1860, does not conflict with
this provision. 37 Penn. St. 109.
10 In all criminal cases, the witnesses must be
examined in the presence of the accused, and
be subject to cross-examination. 51 Penn. St. 338.
This clause applies to impeachments, which are
criminal prosecutions. Porter’s Trial 100-12,
But depos.tions were taken and read on the trial
of Judge Hopkinson. Hopkinson’s Trial 40-3.
It_doos not, however, abrogate the common-law
principle, that dying declarations are admissible
in evidence, in cases of homicide. 2 How. (Miss.)
656. Meigs 265. 11 Ga. 353. 8 Ohio St. 13],
7 Towa 349,
CONSTITUTION OF PENNSYLVANIA. 39
evidence agains; himself,’ nor can he be deprived of his life, liberty or property,
unless by the judgment of his peess, or the law of the land?
Sxcr. 10. No person shall, for any indictable offence, be proceeded against
criminally, by information, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in
the militia, when in actual service, in time of war or public danger: or, by leave
of the court, for oppression or misdemeanor in office.’ No person shall, for the
same offence, be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb ; nor shall private property
be taken or applied to public use, without authority of law, and without just com-
pensation being first made or secured.®
Sxcr. 11. All courts shall be open: and every man, for an injury done him in
his lands, goods, person or reputation, shall have remedy by due course of law,®
and right and justice administered, without sale, denial or delay. Suits may be
brought against the commonwealth, in such manner, in such courts, and in such
cases, as the legislature may by law direct.”
Srcr. 12. No power of suspending laws shall be exercised, unless by the legis-
lature, or by its authority.
Szor. 13. Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor
cruel punishments inflicted.
Szor. 14. All prisoners shall be bailable by sufficient sureties, unless for capital
offences,’ when the proof is evident, or presumption great;® and the privilege of the
1 See 3 Y.515. 24N. Y¥. 74.
2 A private act is not sucha law. 5 W. & S.
171. 6 Penn. St. 87. And see 1 Curt. C. C. 314.
It means, judgment of law, in its regular course
of administration through courts of justice. 46
Penn. St. 460. 65 Ibid. 399, 413. A law must
furnish some just form or mode in which the duty
of the citizen shall be determined, before he can
be visited with a penalty for non-performance.
81 Penn. St. 80.
3 See 3 Dall. 490. 2 Ibid. 112. 1 Y. 206. Ibid.
870. Ibid. 419. 18. & R. 382. The act of 1843,
compelling a sheriff to dismiss a deputy who ex-
torts illegal fees, is constitutional. 75 Penn. St. 75.
4 This only applies to capital offences. 29 Penn.
St. 323. The court, even in a capital case, may
discharge a jury, before verdict, in case of abso-
lute necessity; but mere inability to agree, is not
such a case; and if a jury be discharged, under
such circumstances, the prisoner may plead it in
bar of another trial. 3 R. 498. And see 60 Penn.
St. 103. 17 W. N.C. 36. A prisoner is not once
in jeopardy, until a full jury is empannelled and
sworn. 105 Penn. St. 1. But from that moment
he is in jeopardy, within the meaning of the con-
stitution. 17 W.N. C. 36.
5 See art. XVI. 38. This clause is a disabling
not an enabling one. 10 W. 66. It is a limita-
tion, not on the taxing power but on the right of
eminent domain. 21.510. There are no other
limitations to the power of the state over private
property, than those that are placed upon it by
the constitution. 6 W. & S. 113. The common-
wealth has a constitutional right to authorize a
turnpike company to lay out a road through the
private ground of a citizen, without making com-
pensation for the soil, 6 Binn. 509; such com-
pensation having been originally made in each
urchaser’s particular grant. 3 Y. 373. 100
enn. St. 362. The mere laying out of streets
through private property, is not a taking, within
the meaning of the constitution ; it is only when
they are actually opened and applied to public
use, that the owners are entitled to compensation.
2W.&8. 320. It is not necessary, that the com-
pensation should be actually ascertained and
paid, before the property is appropriated; it is
enough, that an adequate remedy is provided,
by which the owner can obtain compensation
without unreasonable delay. 1 Penn. St. 309.
10 Ibid. 97. 58 Thid. 26. 8 Phila. 282. See 17
Penn. St. 524. And a Jaw limiting the time with-
in which the owner’s claim for damages shall be
exhibited, is not unconstitutional. 11 N. Y. 308.
To authorize the taking of private property, for
public use, there must be an adjudication upon
the facts which render it proper. 81 Penn. St,
80; 9 Phila. 171. The legislature may constitu-
tionally require the owners of property benefited
by a public improvement, to pay the damages sus-
tained by those whose property is taken, in pro-
portion to the benefits received by each of them.
3 W. 296. 7 Penn. St. 175. 8 Wend. 85. 4 N.
Y.419. But if the whole benefit bea public one,
and the owners do not derive any special benefit
from the improvement, such act is unconstitutional.
69 Penn. St. 352. 89 Ibid. 265. 93 Ibid. 15. And
the government cannot take the property of one
citizen, for the mere purpose of transferring it to
another, even for a full compensation, where the
public is not interested in such transfer; such an
arbitrary exercise of power is an infringement of
the spirit of the constitution, not being within the
powers delegated by the people to the legislature.
1 Penn. St. 309. 2 Ibid. 24. 6 Ibid. 91. 13 Ibid.
217. 16 Ibid. 264. 31 Ibid. 90. 55 Ibid. 16. 67
Ibid. 479. 6 N. Y. 358. The legislature may,
indeed, authorize a trustee of the legal estate
in land to convert it into money, for the purpose
of distributing the proceeds among the parties
entitled. 2 Penn. St. 277. Ibid. 393. 17 Ibid.
434, 21 Ibid. 201. But they cannot authorize
the sale of the property of parties sui juris, and
seised of a vested estate, against their consent.
16 Penn. St. 256. 31 Ibid. 87. And see 68 Ibid.
248. 91 Ibid. 30. The right of eminent domain
extends to corporate franchises. 91 Penn. St. 216.
102 Ibid. 123.
6 This requires that the law relating to the
transaction in controversy, at the time when it is
complete, shall be an inherent element of the case,
and shall guide the decision; and that the case
shall not be altered, in its substance, by any sub-
sequent law. 33 Penn. St. 495.
6 W. GS. 116, 117.
8 A prisoner charged with homicide, may be
admitted to bail, even after indictment found,
where the evidence shows that the offence is not
a capital one. 2 Pitts. 362. 2 Ash. 227.
® This clause has reference to the guilt of the
prisoner, not to the nature or degree of the offence
2 Pitts. 362.
40 CONSTITUTION OF PENNSYLVANIA.
writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended unless when, in case of rebellion or
invasion, the public safety may require it. a : 2
Sxor. 15. No commission of oyer and terminer or jail delivery shall be issued.
Sxcr. 16. The person of a debtor, where there is not strong presumption of
fraud, shall not be continued in prison, after delivering up his estate for the benefit
of his creditors, in such manner as shall be prescribed by law.
Sucr. 17. No ex post facto law,! nor any law impairing the obligation of contracts?
or making irrecoverable any grant of special privileges or immunities shall be
assed.
Sscr. 18. No person shall be attainted of treason or felony by the legislature.
Secr. 19. No attainder shall work corruption of blood, nor, except during the
life of the offender, forfeiture of estate to the commonwealth. The estate of such
persons as shall destroy their own lives shall descend or vest as in cases of natural
death ; and if any person shall be killed by casualty, there shall be no forfeiture by
reason thereof.
Sxcr. 20. The citizens have a right, in a peaceable manner, to assemble together
for their common good, and to apply to those invested with the powers of govern-
ment, for redress of grievances, or other proper purposes, by petition, address or
remonstrance.
Sror. 21. The right of the citizens to bear arms in defence of themselves and
the state, shall not be questioned.’
Sror. 22. No standing army shall, in time of peace, be kept up, without the
consent of the legislature ; and the military shall, in all cases, and at all times, be
in strict subordination to the civil power. :
Sxot. 23. No soldier shall, in time of peace, be quartered in any house, without
the consent of the owner; nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by
law.
Secor. 24. The legislature shall not grant any title of nobility or hereditary dis-
tinction ; nor create any office, the appointment to which shall be fora longer term
than during good behavior.
Srcr. 25. Emigration from the state shall not be prohibited.
Szcr. 26. To guard against transgressions of the high powers which we have
delegated, WE DECLARE, that everything in this article is excepted out of the gen-
eral powers of government, and shall forever remain inviolate.
ARTICLE II.
OF THE LEGISLATURE.
Secr. 1. The legislative power of this commonwealth shall be vested in a gen-
eral assembly,® which shall consist of a senate and a house of representatives.
1 Any law changing the punishment of offences
committed before its passage, is ex post fucto and
void, under the constitution, unless the change
consist in the remission of some separable part
of the punishment before prescribed, or be refer-
rible to prison discipline or penal administration,
as its primary object. 22 N. Y. 95. An act
granting a new trial is unconstitutional. 15 Penn.
St. 18. 16 Ibid. 266-7. 43 Ibid. 512. 2 Pitts.
360. But an act extending the period of limita-
tion where the existing limitation has not run
against the prosecution of a crime, is not an ex
post facto law. 96 Penn. St. 506.
2 Seo 4d W. & S. 218. 2 Whart. 396. 8W.& 8.
49. 41 Penn. St. 441. 4 Phila. 309. An act of
assombly cannot impair a contract made, after it
has passed both houses of the general assembly,
but before its approval by the governor. 33 Penn.
St. 202, The legislature, provided it do not vio-
late the constitutional prohibitions, may pass
retrospective laws. 7 W.300. 56 Penn. St. 57.
See 3! Ibid. 289. Ibid. 301. 56 Ibid. 46. But a
contract which has become void, by force of its
inherent conditions, cannot be reinstated by act
of assembly. 39 Penn. St. 435. See 51 Ibid. 9.
Whenever a power to repeal, alter or amend_a_ 60,
charter, is reserved in it, its exercise does not
impair the obligation of the vontract. 55 Penn.
St. 452. See 8 Wall. 430. The charter of a mu-
nicipal corporation is not a contract, within the
prohibition of the constitution. 59 Penn. St. 174.
5 An act prohibiting the carrying of concealed
Weapons, is not a violation of this section. 77
Penn. St. 470.
* See 26 Penn. St. 33.
5 In 72 Penn. St. 491, it was decided by the
supreme court, that an act submitting the question
of granting tavern-licenses to the electors of a
ward, was not in conflict with the constitution.
In 6 Penn. St. 507, the former supreme court
arrived at exactly an opposite conclusion. Each
of these decisions was made by abare majority of
the court, so that in point of number, the judges
on either side of the question are evenly balanced.
Under these circumstances, the question can
hardly be deemed settled in Pennsylvania. In 17
N. Y. 281, it was ruled by the court of appeals
of New York, that a judgment given by a divided
court, though it settles the case between the par-
ties, was not obligatory as a precedent,
8 See 11 Penn, St. 494. 15 Ibid. 20. 16 Pet.
CONSTITUTION OF PENNSYLVANIA. 41
Sxor. 2. Members of the general assembly shall be chosen at the general election,
every second year.' Their term of service shall begin on the first day of Decem-
ber next after their election. Whenever a vacancy shall occur in either house,
the presiding officer thereof shall issue a writ of election, to fill such vacancy for the
remainder of the term.
Sect. 3. Senators shall be elected for the term of four years, and representatives
for the term of two years.
Sect. 4. The general assembly shall meet at twelve o’clock, noon, on the first
Tuesday of January, every second year, and at other times when convened by the
governor, but shall hold no adjourned annual session after the year 1878. In case
of a vacancy in the office of United States senator from this commonwealth, iz a
recess between sessions, the governor shall convene the two houses, by proclama-
tion, un notice, not exceeding sixty days, to fill the same.
Secr. 5. Senators shall be at least twenty-five years of age, and representatives
twenty-one years of age. They shall have been citizens and inhabitants of the
state four years, and inhabitants of their respective districts, one year next before
their election (unless absent on the public business of the United States or of
this state), and shall reside in their respective districts, during their terms
of service.
Sxot. 6. No senator or representative shall, during the time for which he shall
have been elected, be appointed to any civil office under this commonwealth ; and
no member of congress, or other person holding any office (except of attorney-at-
law, or in the militia), under the United States or this commonwealth, shall be a
member of either house, during his continuance in office.?
Sect. 7. No person hereafter convicted of embezzlement of public moneys,
bribery, perjury or other infamous crime,’ shall be eligible to the general assembly,
or capable of holding any office of trust or profit in this commonwealth.
Szct. 8. The members of the general assembly shall receive such salary and
mileage for regular and special sessions, as shall be fixed by law, and no other
compensation whatever, whether for service upon committee or otherwise. No
member of either house shall, during the term for which he may have been
elected, receive any increase of salary or mileage, under any law passed during such
term.‘
Sct. 9. The senate shall, at the beginning and close of each regular session,
and at such other times as may be necessary, elect one of its members president
pro tempore, who shall perform the duties of the lieutenant-governor, in any case
of absence or disability of that officer, and whenever the said office of lieutenant-
overnor shall be vacant. The house of representatives shall elect one of its mem-
ers as speaker. Each house shall choose its other officers, and shall judge of the
election and qualifications of its members.
Secr. 10. A majority of each house shall constitute a quorum: but a smaller
number may adjourn from day to day, and compel the attendance of absent mem-
bers.
Srcr. 11. Each house shall have power to determine the rules of its proceed-
ings, and punish its members, or other persons, for contempt or disorderly behavior
in its presence,® to enforce obedience to its process, to protect its members against
violence, or offers of bribes or private solicitation, and, with the concurrence of
two-thirds, to expel a member, but not a second time, for the same cause ; and
shall have all other powers necessary for the legislature of a free state.’ A mem-
ber expelled for corruption shall not thereafter be eligible to either house; and
punishment for contempt or disorderly behavior, shall not bar an indictment for the
same offence.
1 If a majority of the votes have been cast is swornin. 18 Penn. St. 519.
for a disqualified person, the one who received
the next highest. number is not to be returned
as elected. 56 Penn. St. 270. 1 Chand. 112.
14 Wis. 497. 13 Cal. 145. Contr@, 14 Ind. 93. 15
Ind. 327. 3 Chicago Leg. News 117. And see
Bright. Blect. Cas. 150-1. 50 N. Y. 451.
3 Jf a member, at the time of his election, hold
@ disqualifying office, it is sufficient, that he
-qualify himself, by a resignation of it, before he
3 See 3 McCreary 266.
4 See 99 Penn. St. 535.
5 The right of each house to judge of the eleo-
tion and qualification of its own numbers, is not
affected by the provisions of art. VIII. 317. 17
W.N.C. 41.
6 See note to 6 Wheat. 204,
7 See 21 Penn. “&. 147.
42 CONSTITUTION OF PENNSYLVANIA.
a .
Sxcr. 12. Each house shall keep a journal of its proceedings, and from time to
time, publish the same, except such parts as require secrecy ; and the yeas and
nays of the members on any question shall, at the desire of any two of them, be
entered on the journal.
Suct. 13. The sessions of each house, and of committees of the whole, shall be
open, unless when the business is such as ought to be kept secret.
Sect. 14. Neither house shall, without the consent of the other, adjourn for more
than three days, nor to any other place than that in which the two houses shall be
sitting.
Szor. 15. The members of the general assembly shall, in all cases, except trea-
son, felony, violation of their oath of office, and breach or surety of the peace, be
privileged from arrest, during their attendance at the sessions of their respective
houses, and in going to and returning from the same; and for any speech or debate
in either house, they shall not be questioned in any other place.?
Srot. 16. The state shall be divided into fifty senatorial districts of compact and
contiguous territory, as nearly equal in population as may be; and each district
shall be entitled to elect one senator. Hach county containing one or more ratios
of population, shall be entitled to one senator for each ratio, and to an additional
senator for a surplus of population exceeding three-fifths of a ratio, but no county
shall form a separate district, unless it shall contain four-fifths of a ratio, except
where the adjoining counties are each entitled to one or more senators, when such
county may be assigned a senator on less than three-fifths, and exceeding one-half
of a ratio; and no county shall be divided, unless entitled to two or more senators,
No city or county shall be entitled to separate representation, exceeding one-sixth
of the whole number of senators. No ward, borough or township shall be divided
in the formation of a district. The senatorial ratio shall be ascertained by divid-
ing the whole population of the state by the number fifty.
Sxcr. 17. The members of the house of representatives shall be apportioned
among the several counties, on a ratio obtained by dividing the population of the
state, as ascertained by the most recent United States census, by two hundred.
Every county containing less than five ratios shall have one representative for every
full ratio, and an additional representative, when the surplus exceeds half a ratio ;
but each county shall have at least one representative. Every county containing
five ratios, or more, shall have one representative for every full ratio. Every city
containing a population equal to a ratio, shall elect separately its proportion of
the representatives allotted to the county in which it is located. Every city enti-
tled to more than four representatives, and every county having over one hundred
thousand inhabitants, shall be divided into districts of compact and contiguous ter-
ritory ; each district to elect its proportion of representatives, according to its popu-
lation ; but no district shall elect more than four representatives.
Secor. 18. The general assembly, at its first session, after the adoption of this
constitution, and immediately after each United States decennial census, shall
apportion the state into senatorial and representative districts, agreeably to the pro-
visions of the.two next preceding sections.
ARTICLE III.
OF LEGISLATION.
Szor. 1. No law shall be passed, except by bill; and no bill shall be so altered
or amended, on its passage through either house, as to change its original purpose.
Seor. 2. No bill shall be considered, unless referred to a committee, returned
therefrom, and printed for the use of the members. :
Szor. 3. No bill, except general appropriation bills, shall be passed, containing
more than one subject, which shall be clearly expressed in its title
1 An adjournment of the house for more than N. C. 498. 2 Chest. Co. R, 4: it i
three days, without the concurrence of the senate, necessary that the title should i. Renee
does not, ipso fucto, work # dissolution of the gen- of its contents. 58 Penn. St. 226. 61 Thid 425.
oral assembly. 9 Phila. 495. It is only necessary that the title should fairly
; See 4 W. N.C. 540. 2; give notice of tho subject of the act, so as to rea
If the title of an act do not clearly indicate sonably lead to an inquiry into its body. 77 Penn
its subject-matter, it is unconstitutional. 10 W. St. 77, Ibid. 429, 81° Ibid. 433 "te an act,
‘i . .
CONSTITUTION OF PENNSYLVANIA, 43
Sect. 4. Every bill shall be read at length, on three different days, in each house;
all amendments made thereto shall be printed for the use of the members, before
the final vote is taken on the bill; and no bill shall become a law, unless, on its
final passage, the vote be taken by yeas and nays, the names of the persons voting
for and against the same beesentered on the journal, and a majority of the members
elected to each house be recorded theréon as voting in its favor?
Sgcr. 5. No amendment to bills by one house shall be concurred in by the other,
except by the vote of a majority of the members elected thereto, taken by yeas
and nays, and the names of those voting for and against recorded upon the journal
thereof’; and reports of committees of conference shall be adopted in either house
only by the vote of a majority of the members elected thereto, taken by yeas and
nays, and the names of those voting recorded upon the journals.
Sect. 6. No law shall be revived, amended, or the provisions thereof extended
or conferred, by reference to its title only, but so much thereof as is revived,
amended, extended or conferred shall be re-enacted and published at length.
Srct. 7. The general assembly shall not pass any local or special law author-
izing the creation, extension or impairing of liens ;
Regulating the affairs of counties, cities, townships, wards, boroughs or school
districts ;
Changing the names of persons or places;
Changing the venue in civil or criminal cases ;
Authorizing the laying out, opening, altering or maintaining roads, highways,
streets or alleys ;
Relating to ferries or bridges, or incorporating ferry or bridge companies, except
for the erection of bridges crossing streams which form boundaries between this
and any other state ;
Vacating roads, town-plats, streets or alleys;
Relating to cemeteries, graveyards, or public grounds, not of the state ;
Authorizing the adoption or legitimation of children ;
Locating or changing county seats ;
Erecting new counties, or changing county lines ;
Incorporating cities, towns or villages, or changing their charters ;
For the opening and conducting of elections, or fixing or changing the place of
voting ;
Granting divorces ;
Erecting new townships or boroughs ;
Changing township lines, borough limits or school districts ;
Creating offices, or prescribing the powers and duties of officers, in counties
cities, boroughs, townships, election or school districts ;
Changing the law of descent or succession ;
Regulating the practice or jurisdiction of, or changing the rules of evidence in,
any judicial proceeding or inquiry before courts, aldermen, justices of the peace,
sheriffs, commissioners, arbitrators, auditors, masters in chancery or other tribunals ;
or providing or changing methods for the collection of debts, or the enforcing of
judgments, or prescribing the effect of judicial sales of real estate ;
Regulating the fees, or extending the powers and duties of aldermen, justices of
the peace, magistrates or constables ; :
Regulating the management of public schools, the building or repairing of schonl-
houses, and the raising of money for such purposes ;
Fixing the rate of interest ;
Affecting the estates of minors or persons under disability, except after due notice
so all parties in interest, to be recited in the special enactment ;
entitled a supplement to a former one, the date
and title of which are given, be germane to the
original statute, it does not violate the constitu-
tional provision. 8 W. N.C. 70. 13 Fed. Rep.
429. 88 Penn. St. 42. If the title of an act be
simple, it is only those provisions that are not
covered by it, that are void. 77 Penn. St. 77.
80 Ibid. 118. 95 Ibid. 437. If, however, the title
of an act tend to mislead as to the power granted,
it is unconstitutional; such title stands on a dif-
ferent footing from one general in its terms. 32
Sm. 91. The title of an act is now deemed a part
of it. 66 Penn. St. 164. 70 Ibid. 311. 6 Phila, 492.
1 An alleged disregard of the forms of legis-
lation required by the constitution on the passage
of a law, is not the subject of judicial inquiry.
85 Penn. St. 401. See 8 N. Y. 317.
2 See 14 Hun 438.
44 CONSTITUTION OF PENNSYLVANIA.
Remitting fines, penalties and forfeitures, or refunding moneys legally paid into
the treasury !
Exempting property from taxation ;
Regulating labor, trade, mining or manufacturing ; :
Creating corporations, or amending, renewing or extending the charters thereof;
Granting to any corporation, association or individual, any special or exclusive
privilege or immunity, or to any corporation, association or individual, the right to
lay down a railroad track ; :
Nor shall the general assembly indirectly enact such special or local law, by the
partial repeal of a general law; but laws repealing local or special acts may be
assed ;
Nor shall any law be passed granting powers or privileges, in any case where the
granting of such powers and privileges shall have been provided for by general law,
nor where the courts have jurisdiction to grant the same, or give the relief asked
for.)
Sxcr. 8. No local or special bill shall be passed, unless notice of the intention to
apply therefor shall have been published, in the locality where the matter or the
thing to be affected may be situated, which notice shall be at least thirty days prior
to the introduction into the general assembly of such bill, and in the manner to
be provided by law; the evidence of such notice having been published, shall be
exhibited in the general assembly, before such act shall be passed.
Sror. 9. The presiding officer of each house shall, in the presence of the house
over which he presides, sign all bills and joint resolutions passed by the general
assembly, after their titles have been publicly read, immediately before signing;
and the fact of signing shall be entered on the journal.
Srcr. 10. The general assembly shall prescribe by law the number, duties and
compensation of the officers and employees of each house; and no payment shall
be made from the state treasury, or be in any way authorized, to any person, except
to an acting officer or employee elected or appointed in pursuance of law.
Szor. 11. No bill shall be passed giving any extra compensation to any public
officer, servant, employee, agent or contractor, after services shall have been ren-
dered or contract made, nor providing for the payment of any claim against the
commonwealth, without previous authority of law.
Sror. 12. All stationery, printing, paper and fuel used in the legislative and
other departments of government, shall be furnished, and the printing, binding
and distributing of the Jaws, journals, department reports, and all other printing
and binding, and the repairing and furnishing the halls and rooms used for the
meetings of the general assembly and its committees, shall be performed under con-
tract, to be given to the lowest responsible bidder below such maximum price, and
under such regulations, as shall be prescribed by law; no member or officer of any
department of the government shall be, in any way, interested in such contracts ;
and all such contracts shall be subject to the approval of the governor, auditor-
general and state treasurer.
Secr. 13. No law shall extend the term of any public officer, or increase or
diminish his salary or emoluments, after his election or appointment.?
Sect. 14. All bills for raising revenue shall originate in the house of represen-
tatives, but the senate may propose amendments as in other bills.
_ Sor. 15. The general appropriation bill shall embrace nothing but appropria-
tions for the ordinary expenses of the executive, legislative and judicial depart-
ments of the commonwealth, interest on the public debt, and for public schools ; all
other appropriations shall be made by separate bills, each embracing but one subject.
_ Secor. 16. No money shall be paid out of the treasury, except upon appropria-
al o by law, and on warrant drawn by the proper officer in pursuance
thereof.
Szor. 17. No appropriation shall be made to any charitable or educational insti-
_} This section is wholly prospective in its pro- the prohibition, see 91 Penn. St. 125; 88 Ibid.
hibition, and docs not repeal existing laws. 85 258; 106 Ibid. 377; 16 W. N.C. 497; 17 Toid. 353;
Penn. St. 357. 90 Ibid. 309. It does not prevent 33 Pitts. L.J.191; 32 Am. L. Reg. 778 343 N. Y.
the classification of municipal corporations with 10; 68 [bid. 381; 70 Ibid. 327 : =
respect to taxation. 77 Penn. St. 338. 85 Ibid. 2 105 Penn. St. 300.
401. As to what is a local or special act, within
'
CONSTITUTION OF PENNSYLVANIA. 45
tution, not under the absolute control of the commonwealth, other than normal
schools, established by law, for the professional training of teachers fer the
public schools of the state, except hy a vote of two-thirds of all the members
elected to each house,
Szcr. 18. No appropriations, except for pensions or gratuities for military ser-
vices, shall be made for charitable, educational or benevolent purposes, to any per-
son or community, nor to any denominational or sectarian institution, corporation
or association.
Sect. 19. The general assembly may make appropriations of money to institu-
tions wherein the widows of soldiers are supported or assisted, or the orphans of
soldiers are maintained or educated ; but such appropriation shall be applied exclu-
sively to the support of such widows and orphans. :
Szcr. 20. The general assembly shall not delegate to any special commission,
private corporation or association, any power to make, supervise or interfere with
any municipal improvement, money, property or effects, whether held in trust or
otherwise, or to levy’ taxes, or perform any municipal function whatever.)
Szct. 21. No act of the general assembly shall limit the amount to be recovered
for injuries resulting in death, or for injuries to persons or property ;? and, in case
of death from such injuries, the right of action shall survive, and the general
assembly shall prescribe for whose benefit such actions shall be prosecuted. No
act shall prescribe any limitations of time within which suits may be brought
against corporations for injuries to persons or property, or for other causes, different
from those fixed by general laws regulating actions against natural persons; and
such acts now existing are avoided.’
Srcr. 22. No act of the general assembly shall authorize the investment of
trust funds by executors, administrators, guardians or other trustees, in the bonds
or stock of any private corporation; and such acts now existing are avoided, saving
investments heretofore made.
Srcr. 23. The power to change the venue in civil and criminal cases shall be
vested in the courts, to be exercised in such manner as shall be provided by law.*
Szct. 24. No obligation or liability of any railroad or other corporation, held
or owned by the commonwealth, shall ever be exchanged. transferred, remitted,
postponed, or in any way diminished, by the general assembly; nor shall such lia
bility or obligation be released, except by payment thereof into the state treasury.
Srcr. 25. When the general assembly shall be convened in special session,
there shall be no legislation upon subjects other than those designated in the pro-
clamation of the governor calling such session.
Szcr. 26. Every order, resolution or’ vote to which the concurrence of both
houses may be necessary, except on the question of adjournment, shall be pre-
sented to the governor, and before it shall take effect, be approved by him, or being
disapproved, shall be repassed by two-thirds of both houses, according to the rules
and limitations prescribed in case of a bill.
Srcr. 27. No state office shall be continued or created for the inspection or
measuring of any merchandise, manufacture or commodity; but any county or
municipality may appoint such officers, when authorized by law.®
Sxcr. 28. No law changing the location of the capital of the state shall be
valid, until the same shall have been submitted to the qualified electors of the
commonwealth, at a general election, and ratified and approved by them.
Srcr. 29. A member of the general assembly who shall solicit, demand or
receive, or consent to receive, directly or indirectly, for himself or for another, from
any company, corporation, or person, any money, office, appointment, employment,
testimonial, reward, thing of value or. enjoyment, or of personal advantage, or
promise thereof, for his vote or official influence, or for withholding the same, or
with an understanding, expressed or implied, that his vote or official action shall
be, in any way, influenced thereby ; or who shall solicit or demand any such money
or other advantage, matter or thing aforesaid, for another, as the consideration
of his vote or official influence, or for withholding the same, or shall give or withhold
his vote or influence, in consideration of the payment or promise of such money,
1 21 Pitts. L. J. 185. 3 25 Pitts. L. J. 184. See 17 W. N.C. 429,
2 This abrogated such limitations contained in * See 83 Penn. St. 254.
exisiing laws. 103 Penn. St. 425. See Ibid. 121. 5 10 Phila. 330. See 17 N.Y. 141.
46 CONSTITUTION OF PENNSYLVANIA.
advantage, matter or thing to another ; shall be held guilty of bribery, within the
meaning of this constitution, and shall incur the disabilities provided thereby for
said offence, and such additional punishment as is or shall be provided by law.?
Sgor. 30. Any person who shall, directly or indirectly, offer, give or promise,
any money or thing of value, testimonial, privilege or personal advantage, to any
executive or judicial officer, or member of the general assembly, to influence him
in the performance of any of his public or official duties, shall be guilty of bribery,
and be punished in such manner as shall be provided by law.
Sect. 31. The offence of corrupt solicitation of members of the general assem-
bly, or of public officers of the state, or of any municipal division thereof, and
avy occupation or practice or solicitation of such members or officers, to influence
their official action, shall be defined by law, and shall be punished by fine and
imprisonment.? . on
Sxcr. 32. Any person may be compelled to testify, in any lawful investigation
or judicial proceeding, against any person who may be charged with having com-
mitted the offence of bribery or corrupt solicitation, or practices of solicitation, and
shall not be permitted to withhold his testimony, upon the ground that it may
criminate himself, or subject him to public infamy; but such testimony shall not
afterwards be used against him, in any judicial proceeding, except for perjury in
giving such testimony; and any person convicted of either of the offences afore-
said shall, as part of the punishment therefor, be disqualified from holding any
office or position of honor, trust or profit in this commonwealth,
Srcr. 33. A member who has a personal or private interest in any measure or
pill proposed or pending before the general assembly, shall disclose the fact to the
house of which he is a member, and shall not vote thereon.
ARTICLE IV.
OF THE EXECUTIVE.
Sxor. 1. The executive department of this commonwealth shall consist of a gov-
ernor, lieutenant-governor, secretary of the commonwealth, attorney-general, audi-
tor-general, state treasurer, secretary of internal affairs, and a superintendent of
public instruction.
Sot. 2. The supreme executive power shall be vested in the governor, who shall
take care that the laws be faithfully executed; he shall be chosen on the day of the
general election, by the qualified electors of the commonwealth, at the places where
they shall vote for representatives. The returns of every election for governor
shall be sealed up and transmitted to the seat of government, directed to the presi-
dent of the senate, who shall open and publish them, in the presence of the members
of both houses of the general assembly. The person having the highest number of
votes shall be governor, but if ‘two or more be equal and highest in votes, one
of them shall be chosen governor, by the joint vote of the members of both houses.
Contested elections shall be determined by a committee, to be selected from both
houses of the general assembly, and formed and regulated in such manner as shall
be directed by law.
Szor. 8. The governor shall hold his office during four years from the third
Tuesday of January next ensuing his election, and shall not be eligible to the office
for the next succeeding term.
Sror. 4. A lieutenant-governor shall be chosen at the same time, in the same
manner, for the same term, and subject to the same provisions as the governor ; he
shall be president of the senate, but shall have no vote, unless they be equally
divided.
Sror. 5. No person shall be eligible to the office of governor or lieutenant-gov-
ernor, except a citizen of the United States, who shall have attained the age of
thirty years, and have been seven years next preceding his election an inhabitant
of the state, unless he shall have been absent on the public business of the United
States, or of this state. :
Sot. 6. No member of congress, or person holding any office under the United
States, or this state, shall exercise the office of governor or lieutenant-governor.
1 See 91 Penn. St. 493. 11 Luz. L. Reg. 25. 2 2 Pears. 534,
CONSTITUTION OF PENNSYLVANIA. 47
Szor. 7. The governor shall be commander-in-chief of the army and navy of
the commonwealth, and of the militia, except when they shall be called into the
actual service of the United States,
Szcr. 8. He shall nominate, and, by and with the advice and consent of two-
thirds of all the members of the senate, appoint a secretary of the commonwealth
and an attorney-general, during pleasure, a superintendent of public instruction, for
four years, and such other officers of the commonwealth as he is or may be author-
ized, by the constitution or law, to appoint ; he shall have power to fill all vacancies
that may happen in offices to which he may appoint, during the recess of the senate,
by granting commissions which shall expire at the end of their next session; he
shall have power to fill any vacancy that may happen, during the recess of the
senate, in the office of auditor-general, state treasurer, secretary of internal affairs,
or superintendent of public instruction, in a judicial office, or in any other elective
office which he is or may be authorized to fill; if the vacancy shall happen during
the session of the senate, the governor shall nominate to the senate, before their
final adjournment, a proper person to fill said vacancy; but in any such case of
vacancy in an elective office, a person shall be chosen to said office, at the next gen-
eral election,! unless the vacancy shall happen within three calendar months imme-
diately preceding such election, in which case, the election for said office shall be held
at the second succeeding general election. In acting on executive nominations, the
senate shall sit with open doors, and, in confirming or rejecting the nominations
of the governor, the vote shall be taken by yeas and nays, and shall be entered on
the journal.
Sect. 9. He shall have power to remit fines and forfeitures,? to grant reprieves,
commutations of sentence and pardons,* except in cases of impeachment; but no
pardon shall be granted, nor sentence commuted, except upon the recommendation
in writing, of the lieutenant-governor, secretary of the commonwealth, attorney-gen-
eral and secretary of internal affairs, or any three of them, after full hearing, upon
due public notice, and in open session ; and such recommendation, with the reasons
therefor, at length, shall be recorded and filed in the office of the secretary of the
commonwealth.
Szct. 10. He may require information in writing from the officers of the exe-
cutive department, upon any subject relating to the duties of their respective offices.
Srcr.'11. He shall, from time to time, give to the general assembly information
of the state of the commonwealth, and recommend to their consideration such
measures as he may judge expedient.
Sxor. 12. He may, on extraordinary occasions, convene the general assembly,
and in case of disagreement between the two houses, with respect to the time of
adjournment, adjourn them to such time as he shall think proper, not exceeding
four months. He shall have power to convene the senate in extraordinary session,
by proclamation, for the transaction of executive business.
Szor. 13. In case of the death, conviction on impeachment, failure to qualify,
resignation, or other disability of the governor, the powers, duties and emoluments
of the office, for the remainder of the term, or until the disability be removed, shall
devolve upon the lieutenant-governor.
Szcr. 14. In case of a vacancy in the office of lieutenant-governor, or when the
lieutenant-governor shall be impeached by the house of representatives, or shall be
unable to exercise the duties of his office, the powers, duties and emoluments:
thereof, for the remainder of the term, or until the disability be removed, shall
Penn. St. 297. 2 Phila. 256. But not of the
costs, to the payment of which a prisoner may
have been sentenced. 2 Whart.440. 46 Penn. St.
446. But see 43 Ibid. 53. A pardon must be
1 This does not apply to offices that are to be
filled at the February election. 101 Penn. St.
375.
£ The fines and penalties which he may remit,
are such only, as are now, or were originally, pay-
able to the state. 3 Penn. St. 126. He may remit
a forfeited recognisance, after judgment for the
use of the county. 9 W. 142.
8 He may pardon, as well before trial, as after.
7 W. 155. 45 Penn. St. 372. 46 [bid. 357. So, he
may grant a conditional pardon. 8 W. & S. 197.
A pardon, although after sentence, is a release
of all fines or imprisonment for the offence. 28
proved by the production of the warrant itself, or
its loss must be accounted for. 6 W. 338. And
see 1 Gr. 329. A pardon obtained hy fraud may
be revoked, before actual delivery. 44 Penn. St.
210. 3 Ben. 307. And see 43 Penn St. 57-9. 9
Phila. 586. Without words of restitution, a par- °
don does not restore a forfeited estate. 3 Gr. 158.
Formal irregularities in a pardon will not annul
its effect. 85 Penn. St. 139.
46 CONSTITUTION OF PENNSYLYANIA.
devolve upon the president pro tempore of the senate ; and the president pro tempore
of the senate shall, in like manner, become governor, if a vacancy or disability shall
occur in the office of governor; his seat as senator shall become vacant, whenever
he shall become governor, and shall be filled by election, as any other vacancy in
the senate.
Sxcr. 15. Every bill which shall have passed both houses, shall be presented to
the governor; if he approve, he shall sign it,! but if he shall not approve, he shall
return it, with his objections, to the house in which it shall have originated, which
house shall enter the objections at large upon their journal, and proceed to recon-
sider it. If, after such reconsideration,? two-thirds of all the members elected to
that house, shall agree to pass the bill, it shall be sent, with the objections, to the
other house, by which likewise it shall be reconsidered; and if approved by two-
thirds of all the members elected to that house, it shall be a law; but in such cases,
the votes of both houses shall be determined by yeas and nays, and the names of the
members voting for and against the bill shall be entered on the journals of each
house respectively. If any bill shall not be returned by the governor, within ten
days after it shall have been presented to him, the same shall be a law, in like
manner as if’ he had signed it, unless the general assembly, by their adjournment,
prevent its return ; in which case, it shall be a law, unless he shall file the same,
with his objections, in the office of the secretary of the commonwealth, and give
notice thereof, by public proclamation, within thirty days after such adjournment.
Srct. 16. The governor shall have power to disapprove of any item or items
of any bill making appropriations of money, embracing distinct items, and the
part or parts of the bill approved shall be the law, and the item or items of appro-
priation disapproved shall be void, unless repassed according to the rules and lim-
itations prescribed for the passage of other bills over the executive veto.
Srcr. 17. The chief justice of the supreme court shall preside upon the trial of
any contested election of governor or lieutenant-governor, and shall decide ques-
tions regarding the admissibility of evidence, and shall, upon request of the com-
mittee, pronounce his opinion upon other questions of law involved in the trial.
The governor and lieutenant-governor shall exercise the duties of their respective
offices, until their successors shall be duly qualified.
Szor. 18. The secretary of the commonwealth shall keep a record of all official
acts and proceedings of the governor, and, when required, lay the same, with all
papers, minutes and vouchers relating thereto, before either branch of the general
assembly ; and perform such other duties as may be enjoined upon him by law.
Sgcr. 19. The secretary of internal affairs shall exercise all the powers, and per-
form all the duties of the surveyor-general, subject to such changes as shall be
made by law. His department shall embrace a bureau of industrial statistics ; and
he shall discharge such duties relating to corporations, to the charitable institutions,
agricultural, manufacturing, mining, mineral, timber and other material or business
interests of the state, as may be prescribed by law. He shall annually, and at such
other times as may be required by law, make report to the general assembly.
Scr. 20. The superintendent of public instruction shall exercise all the powers
and perform all the duties of the superinter dent of common schools, subject to
such changes as shall be made by law.
Szcr. 21. The term of the secretary of internal affairs shall be for four years ;
of the auditor-general, three years; and of the state treasurer, two years. These
officers shall be chosen by the qualified electors of the state, at general elections.
No person elected to the office of auditor-general or state treasurer shall be capable
of holding the same office for two consecutive terms.
Srcr. 22. The present great seal of Pennsylvania shall be the seal of the state.
All commissions shall be in the name and by authority of the commonwealth of
Pennsylvania, and be sealed with the state seal, and signed by the governor.
1 An act of assembly is passed, only when it has resolution, to recall a bill, after it has been sent
gone through all the forms made necessary by the
constitution, to give it force and validity as a
binding rule of conduct for the citizen. 33 Penn,
St. 202. The governor may sign a bill, after the
adjournment of the legislature. 21 N. Y¥. 517.
One branch of the legislature has no power, by
to the governor for approval, 33 N. Y. 269.
_? After a vote on the question of reconsidera-
tion, no further action can be had on the bill: the
vote is a final one, and a motion to reconsider it
is not in order. 4 Brewst. 133; 8 Phila, 117.
CONSTITUTION OF PENNSYLVANIA. 49
ARTICLE V.
OF THE JUDICIARY.
Sxor. 1. The judicial power of this commonwealth? shall be vested in a supreme
court, in courts of common pleas, courts of oyer and terminer and general jaii
del.very, courts of quarter sessions of the peace, orphans’ courts, magistrates’
courts, and in such other courts as the general assembly may, from time to time,
establish.?
Sxcr. 2. The supreme court shall consist of seven judges, who shall be elected
by the qualified electors of the state at large. They shall hold their offices for the
term of twenty-one years, if they so long behave themselves well, but shall not be
again eligible. The judge whose commission shall first expire, shall be chief justice,
and thereafter, each judge whose commission shall first expire, shall, in turn, be
chief justice.
Sgor. 3. The jurisdiction of the supreme court shall extend over the state,’ and
the judges thereof’ shall, by virtue of their offices, be justices of oyer and termi-
ner and general jail delivery in the several counties ;* they shall have original
jurisdiction in cases of injunction, where a corporation is a party defendant, of
habeas corpus, of mandamus to courts of inferior jurisdiction, and of guo warranto
as to all officers of the commonwealth whose jurisdiction extends over the state, but
shall not exercise any other original jurisdiction ; they shall have appellate jurisdic-
tion, by appeal, certtorar? or writ of error, in all cases, as is now or may hereafter
be provided by law.
Sect. 4. Until otherwise directed by law, the courts of common pleas shall con-
tinue as at present established, except as herein changed ;* not more than four
counties shall, at any time, be included in one judicial district organized for said
courts.
Szor. 5. Whenever a county shall contain forty thousand inhabitants, it shall
constitute a separate judicial district, and shall elect one judge learned in the law ;
and the general assembly shall provide for additional judges, as the business of the
said district may require.’ Counties containing a population less than is sufficient
to constitute separate districts, shall be formed into convenient single districts, or,
if necessary, may be attached to contiguous districts, as the general assembly may
provide. The office of associate judge, not learned in the law, is abolished, in
counties forming separate districts: but the several associate judges in office when
this constitution shall be adopted, shall serve for their unexpired terms?
Sxot. 6. In the counties of Philadelphia and Allegheny, all the jurisdiction and
powers now vested in the district courts and courts of common pleas, subject to
such changes as may be made by this constitution, or by law, shall be, in Philadel-
phia, vested in four, and in Allegheny, in two, distinct and separate courts of equal
1 The legislature has no judicial power, and
therefore, cannot grant a new trial. 15 Penn. St.
18. 16 ibid. 267. Or, a review of a decree of the
orphans’ court. 43 Ibid. 512. 2 Pitts. 360. And
see ll Penn, St. 494, Nor can they bind the courts
by a declaratory law. 16 N. ¥. 424. The legis-
lature cannot abolish any of the courts mentioned
in this article. 58 Penn. St. 226.
‘ ; See7 W. & S. 68. 8 Ibid. 382. 2 Penn. St.
42.
3 The division of the state into districts, does
not affect the jurisdiction. 23 Penn. St. 355.
The constitution invests the supreme court with
jurisdiction co-extensive with the state, and the
legislature has no power to limit it, nor to prohibit
the court from issuing its process, at any time, to
all parts of the state, The division of the state
into districts is merely for the convenient trans-
action of business. 37 Penn. St. 237.
* Hach of the judges of the supreme court has
power to hold a court of oyer and terminer, in
any county of the state. 33 Penn. St. 80. And
the court may remove an indictment, by certiorari,
before trial. 17 W. N.C. 53.
This includes municipal corporations. 77
Penn. St. 338. The supreme court will not enter-
tain original jurisdiction of a bill against a cor-
poration, when the prayer for an injunction is
merely subsidiary, and not the main object of the
suit. 382 Leg. Int. 448. 1 W. N.C. 611. Nor
unless special ground is laid. 2 W. N. OC. 241.
And see 11 Phila. 602.
6 2 Penn. St. 244.
7 The Jegislature may create an additional law
judge in a district composed of several counties.
86 Penn. St. 54. If the legislature attach a |
county containing less than 40,000 inhabitants, to
one containing a greater number, the inhabitants
of the former have a right to vote at the elec-
tion of judges for the new judicial district.
16 W. N. C. 481. The case of Commonwealth
v. Dumbauld, 97 Penn. St. 293, was decided
by a bare majority of the judges, and is only
authority for the single point in issue, that under
the then existing legislation, the county of Fay-
ette was not entitled to elect associate judges.
This section does not execute itself. Ibid.
8 They sit in all the courts, as heretofore, 3
Luz. L. Reg. 7, including the oyer and terminer
75 Penn. St. 424.
50
and co-ordinate jurisdiction, composed of three judges each; the said courts in
Philadelphia shall be designated respectively as the court of common pleas number
one, number two, number three, and number four, and in Allegheny, as the court
of common pleas uuwber one and number two: but the number of said courts may
be by law increased, from time to time, and shall be, in like manner, designated by
guccessive numbers ; the number of judges in any of said courts, or in any county
where the establishment of an additional court may be authorized by law, may be
increased from time to time ; and whenever such increase shall amount in the whole
to three, such three judges shall compose a distinct and separate court as aforesaid,
which shall be numbered as aforesaid. In Philadelphia, all suits shall be instituted
in the said courts of common pleas, without designating the number of said court,
and the several courts shall distribute and apportion the business among them, in
such manner as shall be provided by rules of court; and each court, to which any
euit shall be thus assigned, shall have exclusive jurisdiction thereof, subject to
change of venue, as shall be provided by law. In Allegheny, each court shall have
exclusive jurisdiction of all proceedings at law and in equity, commenced therein,
subject to change of venue, as may be provided by law.
Szcr. 7. For Philadelphia, there shall be one prothonotary’s office, and one pro-
thonotary for all said courts, to be appointed by the judges of said courts, and to
hold office for three years, subject to removal by a majority of the said judges; the
said prothonotary shall appoint such assistants as may be necessary and authorized
by said courts; and he and his assistants shall receive fixed salaries, to be deter-
mined by law and paid by said county ; all fees collected in said office, except such
as may be by law due to the commonwealth, shall be paid by the prothonotary into
the county treasury. Each court shall have its separate dockets, except the judg-
ment-docket, which shall contain the judgments and liens of all the said courts, as
is or may be directed by law.
Sxcr. 8. The said courts in the counties of Philadelphia and Allegheny, respect-
ively, shall, from time to time, in turn, detail one or more of their judges to hold
the courts of oyer and terminer, and the courts of quarter sessions of the peace of
said counties, in such manner as may be directed by law.)
Sxcr. 9. Judges of the courts of common pleas learned in the law shall be judges
of the courts of oyer and terminer, quarter sessions of the peace and general jail
delivery, and of the orphans’ court, and within their respective districts, shall be
justices of the peace as to criminal matters.?
Sect. 10. The judges of the courts of common pleas, within their respective
counties, shall have power to issue writs of certiorari to justices of the peace and
other inferior courts not of record, and to cause their proceedings to be brought
before them, and right and justice to be done.®
Secor. 11. Except as otherwise provided in this constitution, justices of the peace
or aldermen shall be elected in the several wards, districts, boroughs and townships,
at the time of the election of constables, by the qualified electors thereof, in such
manner as shall be directed by law, and shall be commissioned by the governor for
a term of five years. No township, ward, district or borough shall elect more than
two justices of the peace or aldermen, without the consent of a majority of the
qualified electors within such township, ward or borough ; no person shall be elected
to such office, unless he shal] have resided within the township, borough, ward or
district, for one year next preceding his election. In cities containing over fifty
oe inhabitants, not more than one alderman shall be elected in each ward or
istrict.
Srcr. 12. In Philadelphia, there shall be established, for each thirty thousand
inhabitants,‘ one court, not of record, of police and civil causes, with jurisdiction
CONSTITUTION OF PENNSYLVANIA.
179 Penn. St. 308. constitution. 3 Y. 96,
2 A new power was hereby intended to be
superadded to their offices, but the judges of the
supreme court were invested with the like power
by the provincial act of 1722, which conferred
upon them all the powers of the justices of the
court of king’s bench in England, who are justices
of the peace throughout the kingdom, ex offteio.
And these powers were secured to them by the
8 The writ of certiorari may issue from the
common pleas, wherever a new jurisdiction is con-
ferred upon magistrates, and the proceeding is
summary. 1 Brewst. 411.
* This section does not execute itself ; there
can be no increase in the number of courts with-
out legislative action. 16 W. N.C. 483.
CONSTITUTION OF PENNSYLVANIA. 51
not exceeding one hundred dollars; such courts shall be held by magistrates, whose
term of office shall be five years, and they shall be elected on general ticket, by the
qualified voters at large ; and in the election of the said magistrates, no voter shall
vote for more than two-thirds of the number of persons to be elected, when more
than one are to be chosen; they shall be compensated only by fixed salaries, to be
paid by said county ; and shall exercise such jurisdiction, civil and criminal, except
as herein provided, as is now exercised by aldermen, subject to such changes, not
involving an increase of civil jurisdiction, or conferring political duties, as may be
made by law. In Philadelphia, the office of alderman is abolished.
Scr. 13. All fees, fines and penalties in said courts shall be paid into the county
treasury.!
Sect. 14. In all cases of summary conviction in this commonwealth, or of judg-
ment in suit for a penalty, before a magistrate, or court not of record, either party
may appeal to such court of record as may be prescribed by law, upon allowance of
the appellate court, or judge thereof, upon cause shown.
Sror. 15. All judges required to be learned in the law, except the judges of the
supreme court, shall be elected by the qualified electors of the respective districts
over which they are to preside,? and shall hold their offices for the period of ten
years, if they shall so long behave themselves well; but for any reasonable cause,
which shall not be sufficient ground forimpeachment, the governor may remove any
of them, on the address of two-thirds of each house of the general assembly.
Srcr. 16. Whenever two judges of the supreme court are to be chosen for the
same term of service, each voter shall vote for one only, and when three are to
be chosen, he shall vote for no more than two; candidates highest in vote shall be
declared elected.
Srct. 17. Should any two or more judges of the supreme court, or any two or
more judges of the court of common pleas for the same district, be elected at the
same time, they shall, as soon after the election as convenient, cast lots for priority
of commission, and certify the result to the governor, who shall issue their com-
missions in accordance therewith.
Sxcr. 18. The judges of the supreme court and the judges of the several courts
of common pleas, and all other judges required to be learned in the law, shall, at
stated times, receive for their services, an adequate compensation, which shall be
fixed by law, and paid by the state They shall receive no other compensation,
fees or perquisites of office, for their services, from any source; nor hold any other
office of profit under the United States, this state or any other state. ,
Sxcr. 19. The judges of the supreme court, during their continuance in office,
shall reside within this commonwealth; and the other judges, during their con-
tinuance in office, shall reside within the districts for which they shall be respect-
ively elected.
Szor. 20. The several courts of common pleas, besides the powers herein con-
ferred, shall have and exercise, within their respective districts, subject to such
changes as may be made by law, such chancery powers as are now vested by law in
the several courts of common pleas of this commonwealth, or as may hereafter be
conferred upon them by law.
Sect. 21. No duties shall be imposed by law upon the supreme court or any of
the judges thereof, except such as are judicial; nor shall any of the judges thereof
exercise any power of appointment, except as herein provided." The court of nisi
prius is hereby abolished; and no court of original jurisdiction, to be presided over
by any one or more of the judges of the supreme court, shall be established.
Scr. 22. In every county wherein the population shall exceed one hundred
12W.N. 0.210. 78 Penn. St. 298. been increased since his appointment; neither
3 The legislature cannot constitutionally pro-
vide that a judge elected by the people shall be
ex officio judge of a new court, with a different
territorial jurisdiction. 66 Penn. St. 76.
3 The legislature cannot abolish «a judicial dis-
trict, and thus legislate out of office the president
judge, before the expiration of his term. 62
Penn. St. 343.
4 The legislature cannot diminish the compen-
sation of a president judge, whose salary has
can they impose a state tax upon his salary, to be
deducted at the treasury, before payment. 5 W.
& §. 403.
5 See 1S. & R. 1.
6 The legislature cannot vest the determination
of legal rights in a court of equity, so as to exclude
the constitutional right of trial by jury. 42 Penn.
St. 488. 73 Ibid. 169,
1 7 Leg. Gaz. 117.
L,
52 CONSTITUTION OF PENNSYLVANIA.
and fifty thousand, the general assembly shall, and in any other county, may,
establish a separate orphans’ court, to consist of one or more judges, who shall be
learned in the law; which court shall exercise all the jurisdiction and powers now
vested in, or which may hereafter be conferred upon the orphans’ courts ; and there-
upon, the jurisdiction of the judges of the court of common pleas within such
county, in orphans’ court proceedings, shall cease and determine. In any county
in which a separate orphans’ court shall be established, the register of wills shall
be clerk of such court,! and subject to its directions, in all matters pertaining to
his office; he may appoint assistant clerks, but only with the consent and approval
of said court. All accounts filed with him as register, or as clerk of the said separate
orphans’ court, shall be audited by the court, without expense to parties, except
where all parties in interest in a pending proceeding shall nominate an auditor, whom
the court may, in its discretion, appoint. In every county, orphans’ courts shall
possess all the powers and jurisdiction of a register’s court; and separate registers’
courts are hereby abolished.
Sor. 23. The style of all process shall be “‘ The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.’
All prosecutions shall be carried on in the name, and by the authority of the com-
monwealth of Pennsylvania, and conclude “against the peace and dignity of the
same.”’S
Sect. 24. In all cases of felonious homicide, and in such other criminal cases as
may be provided for by law, the accused, after conviction and sentence, may remove
the indictment, record and all proceedings, to the supreme court, for review.‘
Srct. 25. Any vacancy happening by death, resignation or otherwise, in any
court of record, shall be filled by appointment by the governor, to continue till the
first Monday of January next succeeding the first general election, which shall
occur three or more months after the happening of such vacancy.®
Srct. 26. All laws relating to courts shall be general, and of uniform operation,
and the organization, jurisdiction and powers of all courts of the same class or
grade, so far as regulated by law, and the force and effect of the process and judg-
ment of such courts, shall be uniform ;* and the general assembly is hereby pro-
hibited from creating other courts, to exercise the powers vested by this constitution
in the judges of the courts of common pleas and orphans’ courts.
Srcr. 27. The parties, by agreement filed, may, in any civil case, dispense with
trial by jury, and submit the decision of such case to the court having jurisdiction
thereof, and such court shall hear and determine the same; and the judgment
thereon shall be subject to writ of error, as in other cases.
ARTICLE VI.
OF IMPEACHMENT AND REMOVAL FROM OFFIOE.
Szor. 1. The house of representatives shall have the sole power of impeach-
ment.
Sror. 2. All impeachments shall be tried by the senate ;? when sitting for that
purpose, the senators shall be upon oath or affirmation; no person shall be con-
victed without the concurrence of two-thirds of the members present.
Szcr. 3. The governor and all other civil officers shall be liable to impeachment
for any misdemeanor in office ;* but judgment in such cases shall not extend
1 See 78 Penn. St. 339.
2 Process must go in the name of the common-
wealth of Pennsylvania; but it is immaterial, in
what part of the precept the commonwealth is
introduced, so that the command be given in its
name. 6 Binn. 184.
5¢The proper conclusion of an indictment is,
Phila. 609. And see 81 Penn. St. 432.
254. 90 Ibid. 397.
7 A momber of the house of representatives,
who votes in favor of prosecuting an impeach-
ment, is net thereby disqualified, if subsequently
elected a senator, from sitting on the trial thereof,
Addison’s Trial 21-8. Porter’s Trial 53.
83 Ibid.
“against the peace and dignity of the common-
wealth of Pennsylvania.” 5S. & R.463. A con-
clusion ‘against the peace of the state, the gov-
ernment and dignity of the same,” is defective.
1 Gr. 262-3.
* This does not empower the supremo court to
review the discretion of the court below in refus-
ing to grant a new trial. 102 Penn. St. 66.
See 27 Penn. St. 444. 13 N. Y. 350.
§ This does not repeal prior special laws. 10
8 A president judge is liable to impeachment,
for preventing one of his associates from deliver-
ing his opinion to a grand or petit jury, upon a
matter before the court. Addison’s Trial 16, 17,
114, 151. The presiding judge is the proper
organ of the court, to express its o inion; but
each member has a right, and it is his duty, to
dcliver his sontiments upon every subject that
occurs in court, Ibid. 114. 4 Dall. 225, .
ter’s Trial 61. ew 25. See Por.
CONSTITUTION OF PENNSYLVANIA. 53
further than to removal from office, and disqualification to hold any office of trust
or profit under this commonwealth; the person accused, whether convicted or
acquitted, shall, nevertheless, be liable to indictment, trial, judgment and punish-
ment, according to law.
Szor. 4. All officers shall hold their offices on the condition that they behave
themselves well while in office, and shall be removed, on conviction of misbehavior
in office, or of any infamous crime.t Appointed officers, other than judges of the
courts of record, and the superintendent of public instruction, may be removed, at
the pleasure of the power by which they shall have been appointed? All officers
elected by the people, except governor, lieutenant-governor, members of the gen-
eral assembly, and judges of the courts of record, learned in the law, shall be
removed by the governor, for reasonable cause, after due notice and full hearing,
on the address of two-thirds of the senate.
ARTICLE VII.
OF THE OATH OF OFFICE.
Szcr. 1. Senators and representatives, and all judicial,’ state and county officers,
shall, before entering on the duties of their respective offices, take and subscribe
the following oath or affirmation : ‘I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will sup-
port, obey and defend the constitution of the United States, and the constitution
of this commonwealth, and that I will discharge the duties of my office with fidel-
ity; that I have not paid or contributed, or promised to pay or contribute, either
directly or indirectly, any money or other valuable thing, to procure my nomination
or election (or appointment), except for necessary and proper expenses expressly
authorized by law; that I have not knowingly violated any election law of this
commonwealth, or procured it to be done by others in my behalf; that I will not
knowingly receive, directly or indirectly, any money or other valuable thing for the
performance or non-performance of any act or duty pertaining to my office, other
than the compensation allowed by law.”
The foregoing oath shall be administered by some person authorized to admin-
ister oaths, and in the case of state officers and judges of the supreme court, shall
be filed in the office of the secretary of the commonwealth, and in the case of
other judicial and county officers, in the office of the prothonotary of the county
in which the same is taken; any person refusing to take said oath or affirmation,
shall forfeit his office ; and any person who shall be convicted of having sworn or
affirmed falsely, or of having violated said oath or affirmation, shall be guilty of
perjury, and be for ever disqualified from holding any office of trust or profit within
this commonwealth. The oath to the members of the senate and house of repre-
sentatives, shall be administered by one of the judges of the supreme court, or of
a court of common pleas learned in the law, in the hall of the house to which the
members shall be elected.
ARTICLE VIII.
OF SUFFRAGE AND ELECTIONS.
Secr. 1. Every male citizen, twenty-one years of age, possessing the following
qualifications, shall be entitled to vote at all elections :*
I. He shall have been a citizen of the United States at least one month.
II. He shall have resided in the state one year (or if, having previously been
a qualified elector or native-born citizen of the state, he shall have removed there-
from and returned, then six months) immediately preceding the election.
1 A conviction of the offence of bribing an elec- assembly to be unconstitutional. 1 Binn. 416. It
tor to vote for him, does not disqualify a sheriff
from exercising the duties of his office. 3 W. &
S. 338. A conviction for misbehavior in office,
requires the removal of the officer convicted, and
ea must be part of the judgment. 1 Leg. Gaz.
» 455.
3100 Penn. St. 222. 103 Ibid. 481.
3 See 128. & R. 353. It is from this clause,
the courts derive their power to declare an act of
is the duty of the court, to declare an act of assem-
bly to be void, if it be a manifest breach of the
constitution. 128. & R. 330. But nothing short
of that, will justify them in so doing. 66 Penn.
St. 164. 99 Ibid. 535.
4 No constitutional qualification of a voter can
be abridged, added to, or altered, by legislation.
58 Penn. St. 338. 59 Ibid. 109. 1 Brewst. 103.
-2 Stew. 239.
54 CONSTITUTION OF PENNSYLVANIA.
III. He shall have resided in the election district where he shall offer to vote. at
least two months immediately preceding the election.’ Ms elt
IV. If twenty-two years of age or upwards, he shall have paid, within two years,
a state or county tax, which shall have been assessed at least two months, and paid
at least one month before the election.”
Sror. 2. The general election shall be held annually on the Tuesday next follow-
ing the first Monday of November; but the general assembly may by law fix a
different day, two-thirds of all the members of each house consenting thereto.
Sxcr. 3. All elections for city, ward, borough and township officers, for regular
terms of service, shall be held on the third Tuesday of February.®
Sect. 4. All elections by the citizens shall be by ballot. Hvery ballot voted
‘ shall be numbered in the order in which it shall be received, and the number
recorded by the election officers on the list of voters, opposite the name of the elector
who presents the ballot. Any elector may write his name upon his ticket, or cause
the same to be written thereon, and attested by a citizen of the district. The elec-
tion officers shall be sworn or affirmed not to disclose how any elector shall have
voted, unless required to do so as witnesses in a judicial proceeding.
Sot. 5. Electors shall in all cases, except treason, felony and breach or surety
of the peace, be privileged from arrest, during their attendance on elections, and
in going to and returning therefrom.
Szcot. 6. Whenever any of the qualified electors of this commonwealth shall be
in actual military service, under a requisition from the president of the United
States, or by the authority of this commonwealth, such electors may exercise the
right of suffrage, in all elections by the citizens, under such regulations as are or
shall be prescribed by law, as fully as if they were present at their usual places of
election.
Srot. 7. All laws regulating the holding of elections by the citizens, or for the
registration of electors, shall be uniform throughout the state ; but no elector shall
be deprived of the privilege of voting, by reason of his name not being registered.
Sect. 8. Any person who shall give, or promise, or offer to give, to an elector,
any money, reward or other valuable consideration, for his vote at an election, or
for withholding the same, or who shall give, or promise to give, such consideration,
to any other person or party, for such elector’s vote, or for the withholding thereof,
and any elector who shall receive, or agree to receive, for himself or for another,
avy money, reward or other valuable consideration, for his vote at an election, or
for withholding the same, shall thereby forfeit the right to vote at such election;
and any elector whose right to vote shall be challenged for such cause, before the
election officers, shall be required to swear or affirm that the matter of the challenga
is untrue, before his vote shall be received. :
Srcr. 9. Any person who shall, while a candidate for office, be guilty of bribery,
fraud or wilful violation of any election law, shall be for ever disqualificd from
holding an office of trust or profit in this commonwealth ; and any person convicted
of wilful violation of the election laws, shall, in addition to any penalties provided
by law, be deprived of the right of suffrage absolutely, fora term of four years.
Sect. 10. In trials of contested elections, and in proceedings for the investiga-
tion of elections, no person shall be permitted to withhold his testimony, upon the
ground that it may criminate himself, or subject him to public infamy; but such
testimony shall not afterwards be used against him, in any judicial proceeding,
except for perjury in giving such testimony.
Sgor. 11. Townships and wards of cities or boroughs, shall form or be divided
into election districts of compact and contiguous territory, in such manner as the
court of quarter sessions of the city or county in which the same are located may
direct: but districts in cities of over one hundred thousand inhabitants shall be
divided by the courts of quarter sessions, having jurisdiction therein, whenever, at
the next preceding election, more than two hundred and fifty votes shall have been
polled therein; and other election districts, whenever the court of the proper county
1 See 71 Penn. St. 302. 11 Phila. 641. 10 that it should be a poll-tux. 28. & R. 267, And
Ibid. 213. 5 W. N. 0.9, seo 1 Brewst. 102-3 tos
2 It must have been assessed upon the elector 83 .W.N. C. 477.
individually ; but, it seems, that it is not required 4 83 Penn, St. 105.
CONSTITUTION OF PENNSYLVANIA. 55
shall be of opinion, that the convenience of the electors and the public interests
will be promoted thereby.
Sgcr. 12, All elections by persons in a representative capacity shall be viva voce.
Sect. 13. For the purpose of voting, no person shall be deemed to have gained
a residence, by reason of his presence, or lost it, by reason of his absence, while
employed in the service, either civil or military, of this state or of the United States,
nor while engaged in the navigation of the waters of the state or of the United
States, or on the high seas, nor while a student of any institution of learning, nor
while kept in any poor-house or other asylum, at public expense, nor while con-
fined in public prison.t
Sect. 14. District election boards shall consist of a judge and two inspectors,
who shall be chosen annually by the citizens. Each elector shall have the right to.
vote for the judge and one inspector, and each inspector shall appoint one clerk,
The first election board for any new district shall be selected, and vacancies in elee.
tion boards filled, as shall be provided by law. lection officers shall be privileged
from arrest, upon days of election, and while engaged in making up and transmit-
ting returns, except upon warrant of a court of record or judge thereof, for an
election fraud, for felony, or for wanton breach of the peace. In cities, they may
claim exemption from jury duty, during their terms of service.
Scr. 15. No person shall be qualified to serve as an election officer, who shall
hold, or shall, within two months, have held, any office, appointment or employment
in or under the government of the United States or of this state, or of any city or
county, or of any municipal board, commission or trust, in any city, save only justices
of the peace and aldermen, notaries-public, and persons in the militia service of the
state ; nor shall any election officer be eligible to any civil office, to be filled at an
election at which he shall serve, save only to such subordinate municipal or local
offices, below the grade of city or county offices, as shall be designated by general
law.
Srct. 16. The courts of common pleas of the several counties of the common.
wealth shall have power, within their respective jurisdictions, to appoint overseers
of elections, to supervise the proceedings of election officers, and to make report to
the court as may be required ; such appointments to be made for any district ina
city or county, upon petition of five citizens, lawful voters of such election district,
setting forth that such appointment is a reasonable precaution to secure the purity
and fairness of elections ; overseers shall be two in number, for an election district,
shall be residents therem, and shall be persons qualified to serve upon election boards,
and in each case, members of different political parties ; whenever the members of
an election board shall differ in opinion, the overseers, if they shall be agreed
thereon, shall decide the question of difference; in appointing overseers of election,
ali the law judges of the proper court, able to act at the time, shall concur in the
appointments made.
Secr. 17. The trial and determination of contested elections of electors of pres-
ident and vice-president, members of the general assembly, and of all public offi-
cers, whether state, judicial, municipal or local, shall be by the courts of law, or by
one or more of the law judges thereof ;? the general assembly shall, by general law,
designate the courts and judges by whom the several classes of election contests
shall be tried, and regulate the manner of trial, and all matters incident thereto ;
but no such law assigning jurisdiction, or regulating its exercise, shall apply to any
contest arising out of an election held before its passage.
ARTICLE TX.
OF TAXATION AND FINANCE.
Sor. 1. All taxes shall be uniform upon the same class of subjects, within the
territorial limits of the authority levying the tax, and shall be levied and collected
111 Phila. 641. 8 This provision did not execute itself; but was
2 It was held in 22 Pitts. L. J. 201, that this mandatory on the legislature to enact general laws
clause, in connection with the act of 19 May 1875, to carry it into effect. 81 Penn. St. 482. 10 W.
abrogated the provision in the charter of the city N.C. 498. 4 Luz. L. Reg. 110. It did not mean,
of Pittsburgh, that the councils should be the that the property should be separated from the
judges of the election of their own members. owners, or that property, not owners, should be
56 CONSTITUTION OF PENNSYLVANIA.
under general laws ;! but the general assembly may, by general laws, exempt from
taxation public property used for public purposes, actual places of religious wor
ship,? places of burial not used or held for private or corporate profit, and institu-
tions of purely public charity.®
Secr. 2. All laws exempting property from taxation, other than the property
above enumerated, shall be void.
Sxct. 3. The power to tax corporations and corporate property shall not be sur-
rendered or suspended, by any contract or grant to which the state shall bea party,
Scr. 4. No debt shall be created by or on behalf of the state, except to supply
casual deficiencies of revenue, repel invasion, suppress insurrection, defend the state
in war, or to pay existing debt; and the debt created to supply deficiencies in reve-
- nue, shall never exceed, in the aggregate, at any one time, one million of dollars.
Scr. 5. All laws authorizing the borrowing of money by and on behalf of the
state, shall specify the purpose for which the money is to be used; and the money
so borrowed shall be used for the purpose specified, and no other.
Scr. 6. The credit of the commonwealth shall not be pledged or loaned to any
individual, company, corporation or association ; nor shall the commonwealth become
a joint owner or stockholder in any company, association or corporation.
Sect. 7. The general assembly shall not authorize any county, city, borough,
township or incorporated district to become a stockholder in any company, associa-
tion or corporation, or to obtain or appropriate money for, or to loan its credit to,
any corporation, association, institution or individual.
Sect. 8. The debt of any county, city, borough, township, school district or other
municipality or incorporated district, except as herein provided, shall never exceed
seven per centum upon the assessed value of the taxable property therein, nor shall
any such municipality or district incur any new debt, or increase its indebtedness,
to an amount exceeding two per centum upon such assessed valuation of property,
without the assent of the electors thereof, ata public election, in such manner as
shall be provided by law;® but any city, the debt of which now exceeds seven per
centum of such assessed valuation, may be authorized by law to increase the same
three per centum, in the aggregate, at any one time, upon such valuation.
Secr. 9. The commonwealth shall not assume the debt, or any part thereof, of any
city, county, borough or township, unless such debt shall have been contracted to
enable the state to repel invasion, suppress domestic insurrection, defend itself in
time of war, or to. assist the state in the discharge of any portion of its present
indebtedness.
Sxcr. 10. Any county, township, school district or other municipality incurring
any indebtedness shall, at or before the time of so doing, provide for the collection
of an annual tax sufficient to pay the interest, and also the principal thereof within
thirty years.
Sect. 11. To provide for the payment of the present state debt, and any addi-
tional debt contracted as aforesaid, the general assembly shall continue and maintain
the sinking fund, sufficient to pay the accruing interest on such debt, and annually
to reduce the principal thereof, by a sum not less than two hundred and fifty thous-
and dollars; the said sinking fund shall consist of the proceeds of the sales of the
taxed. 79 Penn. St.100. Therefore,an act tax- held therein. 1 Chest. Co. R. 265. Conventual
ing coal companies on their franchises, according
to the amount of coal mined, is constitutional.
Ibid. 32 Leg. Int. 336; 2 Pears. 402. And see
83 Penn. St. 156. 3 L. Law Rev. 49. This sec-
tion prohibits the levying of an income tax. 16
Ww. N. C. 289.
1 The legislature may, nevertheless, classify the
subjects of taxation. 32 Sm. 911.
2 In 85 Penn. St. 288, it was held, that ground
upon which a church is in course of erection, but
which has never been used for divine worship, is
not exempt from taxation under the act of 1874,
But this was remedied by the act 4 June 1879,
P. L. 90. And the supreme court of New York
came to a different conclusion, in 20 Hun 297.
But a parsonage is not exempt, though erected
upon ground appurtenant to a church, 10 W.N.
C. 170; though occasional religious services are
buildings, in which instruction is given to all
persons gratuitously, who are unable to pay, and
in which divine service is statedly holden, are not
exempt. 10 W. N.C. 168. As to the exemption
of camp-mecting grounds, see 12 Ibid. 103;
1 Kulp 49.
sna See 86 Ponn. St. 306. 90 Ibid. 21. 94 Ibid, +
44 W.N.C. 213. 2 Pears. 230. See 48 Leg.
Int. 36.
5 See 47 Penn. St. 189. 77 Ibid. 338. 84 Ibid.
55. 103 Thid. 273. 2 W. N.C. 349. An act
authorizing the imposition of a tax, for the
payment of bounties to volunteers, to fill an im-
pending draft, is not forbidden by this section,
50 Penn. St. 150
8 See 16 W.N. C. 484. 17 Ibid. 42,
CONSTITUTION OF PENNSYLVANIA. 57
public works or any part thereof, and of the income or proceeds of the sale of any
stocks owned by the commonwealth, together with other funds and resources that
may be designated by law, and shall be increased from time to time, by assigning to
it any part of the taxes or other revenues of the state not required for the ordinary
and current expenses of the government; and unless in case of war, invasion or
insurrection, no part of the said sinking fund shall be used or applied otherwise
than in the extinguishment of the public debt.
Szcr. 12. The moneys of the state, over and above the necessary reserve, shall
be used in the payment of the debt of the state, either directly or through the sink-
ing fund; and the moneys of the sinking fund shall never be invested in or loaned
upon the security of anything, except the bonds of the United States, or of this
state.
Secr. 13. The moneys held as necessary reserve shall be limited by law to the
amount required for current expenses, and shall be secured and kept as may be pro-
vided by law. Monthly statements shall be published, showing the amount of such
moneys, where the same are deposited, and how secured.
Sxcr. 14. The making of profit out of the public moneys, or using the same for
any purpose not authorized by law, by any officer of the state, or member or officer
of the general assembly, shall be a misdemeanor, and shall be punished as may be
provided by law; but part of such punishment shall be disqualification to hold
office for a period of not less than five years.
ARTICLE X.
OF EDUCATION.
Sxot. 1. The general assembly shall provide for the maintenance and support of
a thorough and efficient system of public schools, wherein all the children of this
commonwealth, above the age of six years, may be educated, and shall appropriate
at least one million dollars each year for that purpose.
Srct. 2. No money raised for the support of the publie schools of the common-
wealth, shall be appropriated to or used for the support of any sectarian school.
Srcr. 3. Women, twenty-one years of age and upwards, shall be eligible to any
office of control or management under the school laws of this state.
ARTICLE XI.
OF THE MILITIA.
Sect. 1. The freemen of this commonwealth shall be armed, organized and disci-
plined for its defence, when and in such manner as may be directed by law. The
general assembly shall provide for maintaining the militia, by appropriations from
the treasury of the commonwealth ; and may exempt from military service, persous
having conscientious scruples against bearing arms.
ARTICLE XII.
OF PUBLIC OFFICERS.
Sect. 1. All officers, whose selection is not provided for in this constitution,
shall be elected or appointed as may be directed by law.
Sect. 2. No member of congress from this state, nor any person holding or
exercising any office or appointment of trust or profit under the United States,
shall, at the same time,! hold or exercise any office in this state, to which a salary,
fees or perquisites shall be attached. The general assembly may by law declare
what offices are incompatible.?
Szcr. 3. Any person who shall fight a duel, or send a challenge for that pur-
pose, or be aider or abettor in fighting a duel, shall be deprived of the right of
holding any office of honor or profit in this state, and may be otherwise punished
as shall be prescribed by law.
1 See 17S. & R. 228-30. 4 Dall. 229. Bright. hold the office of commissioner of an incorporated
Elect. Cas. 655. district, although there were no fees or perquisites
2 Under the act of 16 April 1838, a deputy- annexed to the office. 5 Penn. St. 67.
marshal of the United States was incompetent to
58 CONSTITUTION OF PENNSYLVANIA.
ARTICLE XIII.
OF NEW COUNTIES.
Sor 1. No new county shall be established which shall reduce any county to
less than four hundred square miles, or to less than twenty thousand inhabitants ;
nor shall any county be formed of less area, or containing a less population ;! nor
shall any line thereof pass within ten miles of the county seat of any county pro-
posed to be divided. :
ARTICLE XIV.
OF COUNTY OFFICERS.
Sxor. 1. County officers shall consist of sheriffs, coroners, prothonotaries, reg-
isters of wills, recorders of deeds, commissioners, treasurers, surveyors, auditors or
controllers? clerks of the courts, district-attorneys, and such others as may, from
time to time, be established by law; and no sheriff or treasurer shall be eligible
for the term next succeeding the one for whick he may be elected.
Sgcr. 2. County officers shall be elected at the general elections, and shall bold
their offices for the term of three years, beginning on the firsts Monday of January
next after their election, and until their successors shall be duly qualified; all
vacancies, not otherwise provided for, shall be filled in such manner as may be pro-
vided by law.
Szcr. 3. No person shall be appointed to any office within any county, who shall
not have been a citizen and an inhabitant therein one year next before his appoint-
ment, if the county shall have been so long erected ; but if it shall not have been
so Jong erected, then within the limits of the county or counties out of which it
shall have been taken.
Secr. 4. Prothonotaries, clerks of the courts, recorders of deeds, registers of
wills, county-surveyors and sheriffs shall keep their offices in the county town of the
county in which they respectively shall be officers.
Sxor. 5 The compensation of county officers shall be regulated by law, and
all county officers who are or may be salaried shall pay all fees which they may
be authorized to receive, into the treasury of the county or state, as may be directed
by law.’ In counties containing over one hundred and fifty thousand inhabitants,
all county officers shall be paid by salary ; and the salary of any such officer and
his clerks, heretofore paid by fees, shall not exceed the aggregate amount of fees
earned during his term, and collected by or for him.*
Secr. 6. The general assembly shall provide by law for the strict accountability
of all county, township and borough officers, as well for the fees which may be
vee by them, as for all public or municipal moneys which may be paid to
them,
Szor. 7. Three county commissioners and three county auditors shall be elected
in each county where such officers are chosen, in the year 1875, and every third
year thereafter; and in the election of said officers, each qualified elector shall vote
for no more than two persons, and the three persons having the highest number
of votes shall be elected; any casual vacancy in the office of county commis-
sioner or county auditor shall be filled by the court of common pleas of the county
in which such vacancy shall occur, by the appointment of an elector of the
proper county, who shall have voted for the commissioner or auditor whose place
is to be filled.
ARTICLE XV.
OF CITIES AND OITY CHARTERS,
Szor. 1. Cities may be chartered, whenever a majority of the electors of
any town or borough, having a population of at least ten thousand, shall vote, at any
general election, in favor of the same.
1 See 19 N. Y. 41. 19 Barb. 81. 3 1W. N.C. 494, 5 Ibid. 203
2102 Penn. St. 354 41 Kulp 297. 39 Leg. Int. 296.
CONSTITUTION OF PENNSYLVANIA. 59
Sxor. 2. Ng debt shall be contracted or liability incurred by any municipal -
commission, except in pursuance of an appropriation previously made therefor by
the municipal government.)
Sxcr. 3. Every city shall create a sinking fund, which shall be inviolably pledged
for the payment of its funded debt.
ARTICLE XVI.
OF PRIVATE CORPORATIONS.
Szcr. 1, All existing charters, or grants of special or exclusive privileges, under
which a bond jide organization shall not have taken place, and business been com-
menced in good faith, at the time of’ the adoption of this constitution, shall there-
after have no validity.’
Sxcr. 2. The general assembly shall not remit the forfeiture of the charter of
any corporation now existing, or alter or amend the same, or pass any other general
or special law for the benefit of such corporation, except upon the condition that
such corporation shall thereafter hold its charter subject to the provisions of this con-
stitution.
Secor. 3. The exercise of the right of eminent domain shall never,be abridged,
or so construed as to prevent the general assembly from taking the property
and franchises of incorporated companies, and subjecting them to public use, the
same as the property of individuals ; and the exercise of the police power of the state
shall never be abridged, or so construed as to permit corporations to conduct their |
business in such manner as to infringe the equal rights of individuals or the general
well-being of the state.’
Sect. 4. In all elections for directors or managers of a corporation, each member
or shareholder may cast the whole number of his votes for one candidate, or distri-
bute them upon two or more candidates, as he may prefer.‘
Sor. 5. No foreign corporation shall do any business in this state, without hav-
ing one or more known places of business, and an authorized agent or agents in the
same, upon whom process may be served.
Srct. 6. No corporation shall engage in any business other than that expressly
authorized in its charter; nor shall it take or hold any real estate, except such as
may be necessary and proper for its legitimate business.
Srct. 7. No corporation shall issue stocks or bonds, except for money, labor done,
or money or property actually received; and all fictitious increase of stock or indebt-
edness shall be void. The stock and indebtedness of corporations shall not be
increased, except in pursuance of general law, nor without the consent of the per-
sons holding the larger amount in value of the stock, first obtained, at a meeting to
be held, after sixty days’ notice, given in pursuance of law.
Szct. 8. Municipal and other corporations and individuals invested with the
privilege of taking private property for public use, shall make just compensation for
property taken, injured or destroyed by the construction or enlargement of their
works, highways or improvements, which compensation shall be paid or secured
before such taking, injury or destruction The general assembly is hereby prohi-
bited from depriving any person of an appeal from any preliminary assessment of
damages against any such corporations or individuals, made by viewers or otherwise ;
and the amount of such damages, in all cases of appeal, shall, on the demand of
either party, be determined by a jury, according to the course of the common law.
15 W.N. C. 153.
2 This section relates exclusively to private cor-
porations. 102 Penn. St. 515.
3 See 30 Alb. L. J. 152.
4 This applies, without further legislation, to
all private corporations incorporated since 1874.
104 Penn. St. 150. But not to then existing cor-
porations, who have not since accepted the bene-
fits of any legislation under the new constitution.
82 Penn. St. 518. 14 W. N. C. 560; 42 Leg. Int.
226. 23 Pitts. L. J. 122.
5 See 84 Penn. St. 319.
6 When private property is taken for public use,
it is not necessary, that the compensation to the
owner should be actually ascertained and paid,
before the property is appropriated ; but it is suf-
ficient, if an adequate remedy be provided, by
which be can obtain compensation, without any
unreasonable delay. 3 W. & S. 460. 6 Ibid.
1138. 1 Penn. St. 132. Ibid. 218. 10 Ibid. 97.
16 Ibid. 192-3. Bright. 183. See art. I. 3 10.
When the commonwealth exercises the power
of eminent domain, it must provide the means of
payment, before taking the property; but a cor-
poration or individual must pay or secure its price.
66 Penn. St. 404. The clause applies to existing
corporations. 14 W. N. C. 545, See 17 Ibid. 193,
198,
60 CONSTITUTION OF PENNSYLVANIA.
Sect. 9. Every banking law shall provide for the registry and countersigning, by
an officer of the state, of all notes or bills designed for circulation ; and that ample
security to the full amount thereof shall be deposited with the auditor-general, for
the redemption of such notes or bills.
Sxcr. 10. The general assembly shall have the power to alter, revoke or annul any
charter of incorporation now existing, and revocable at the adoption of this con-
stitution, or any that may hereafter be created, whenever, in their opinion, it may
be injurious to the citizens of this commonwealth, in such manner, however, that no
injustice shall be done to the corporators No law hereafter enacted shall create,
renew or extend the charter of more than one corporation.’ A
Sxcr. 11. No corporate body, to possess banking and discounting privileges,* shall
be created or organized, in pursuance of any law, without three months’ previous
public notice, at the place of the intended location, of the intention to apply for such
privileges, in such manner as shall be prescribed by law; nor shall a charter for
such privilege be granted for a longer period than twenty years. at
Secr. 12. Any association or corporation organized for the purpose, or any indi-
vidual, shall have the right to construct and maintain lines of telegraph within this
state, and to connect the same with other lines; and the general assembly shall, by
general law, of uniform operation, provide reasonable regulations to give full extent
to this section. No telegraph company shall consolidate with, or hold a controlling
interest in the stock or bonds of, any other telegraph company, owning a competing
line, or acquire, by purchase or otherwise, any other competing line of telegraph.
Secr. 13. The term “ corporations,” as used in this article, shall be construed to
include all joint-stock companies or associations, having any of the powers or privi-
leges of corporations not possessed by individuals or partnerships.
ARTICLE XVII.
OF RAILROADS AND CANALS.
Szcrt. 1. All railroads and canals shall be public highways, and all railroad and
zanal companies shall be common carriers. Any association or corporation organ-
ized for the purpose, shall have the right to construct and operate a railroad between
any points within this state, and to connect, at the state line, with railroads of other
states. very railroad company shall have the right, with its road, to intersect, con-
nect with or cross any other railroad ;4 and shall receive and transport each the
other’s passengers, tonnage and cars, loaded or empty, without delay or discrimi-
nation.
Sect. 2. Every railroad and canal corporation organized in this state shall main-
tain an office therein, where transfers of its stock shall be made, and where its books
shall be kept for inspection by any stockholder or creditor of such corporation, in
which shall be recorded the amount of capital stock subscribed or paid in, and by
whom, the names of the owners of its stock, and the amounts owned by them,
respectively, the transfers of said stock, and the names and places of residence of
its officers.
Sucr. 3. All individuals, associations and corporations shall have equal right to
have persons and property transported over railroads and canals, and no undue or
unreasonable discrimination shall be made, in charges for, or in facilities for, trans-
portation of freight or passengers, within the state, or coming from or going to any
other state. Persons and property transported over any railroad, shall be delivered
1 This clause reserves to the state the right to im-
pose taxes upon a bank, according to the legisla-
tive discretion, notwithstanding a provision in its
charter ‘‘ that the capital stock in such bank shall
not be subject to taxation, for other than state
purposes.” 87 Penn. St. 340. It formsa part of
the contract with every banking corporation, 21
N.Y. 9. The legislature is not the final judge
whether the casus judicis, upon which the autho-
rity to repeal a charter is based, has accrued. 58
Peun. St. 26,
2 To create, renew or extend a charter, within
the meaning of this section, means, to make a
charter which never existed before; to revive an
old one which has expired; or to increase the
time for the existence of one which would other-
wise reach its limit at an earlier period. 27 Penn.
St. 380, 388. And see 21 Ibid. 200.
3 The exercise of the banking privilege of dis-
counting notes by a saving-fund society, incorpo-
rated without such notice, renders the notes so
discounted void, in their hands; such illegal
action cannot be a ground of title. 5 Phila. 18.
The privileges granted to building associations
are not within this prohibition. 35 Penn, St. 223,
Ibid. 225 n. 30 Ibid. 465. The word “ discount-
ing,” is to be understood in its banking sense,
and is confined to dealing in promissory notes and
negotiable paper. 4 Leg. Gaz. 400.
§ See 77 Penn. St. 173.
CONSTITUTION OF PENNSYLVANIa. 61
at any station, at charges not exceeding the charges for transportation of persons and
property of the same class, in the same direction, to any more distant station ; but
excursion and commutation tickets may be issued, at special rates.
Sect. 4. No railroad, canal or other corporation, or the lessees, purchasers or man-
agers of any railroad or canal corporation, shall consolidate the stock, property or
franchises of such corporation, with, or lease or purchase the works or franchises
of, or in any way control, any other railroad or canal corporation, owning, or having
under its control, a parallel or competing line; nor shall any officer of such railroad
or canal corporation act as an officer of any other railroad or canal corporation,
owning or having the control of a parallel or competing line; and the question
whether railroads or canals are parallel or competing lines, shall, when demanded
by the party complainant, be decided by a jury, as in other civil issues.
Szor. 5. No incorporated company, doing the business of a common carrier, shall,
directly or indirectly, prosecute or engage in mining or manufacturing articles, for
transportation over its works; nor shall such company, directly or indirectly, engage
in any other business than that of common carriers, or hold or acquire lands,
freehold or leasehold, directly or indirectly, except such as shall be necessary for
carrying on its business; but any mining or manufacturing company may carry the
products of its mines and manutactories on its railroad or canal, not exceeding fifty
miles in length.
Sxct. 6. No president, director, officer, agent or employee of any railroad or canal
company shall be interested, directly or indirectly, in the furnishing of material or
supplies to such company, or in the business of transportation as a common carrier
of freight or passengers over the works owned, leased, controlled or worked by such
company.
Sect. 7. No discrimination in charges, or facilities for transportation, shall be
made between transportation companies and individuals, or in favor of either, by
abatement, drawback or otherwise ; and no railroad or canal company, or any lessee,
manager or employee thereof, shall make any preferences in furnishing cars or
motive power.
Sscr. 8. No railroad, railway or other transportation company shall grant free
passes, or passes at a discount, to any person, except officers or employees of the
company.
Scr. 9. No street passenger railway shall be constructed within the limits of
any city, borough or township, without the consent of its local authorities.
Sect. 10. No railroad, canal or other transportation company, in existence at the
time of the adoption of this article, shall have the benefit of any future legislation,
by general or special laws, except on condition of complete acceptance of all the
provisions of this article.
Sxct. 11. The existing powers and duties of the auditor-general in regard to
railroads, canals and other transportation companies, except as to their accounts, are
hereby transferred to the secretary of internal affairs, who shall have a general
supervision over them, subject to such regulations and alterations as shall be pro-
vided by law; and, in addition to the annual reports now required to be made, said
secretary may require special reports, at any time, upon any subject relating to the
business of said companies, from any officer or officers thereof.
Sror. 12. The general assembly shall enforce, by appropriate legislation, the pro-
visions of this article.
ARTICLE XVIII. ’
OF FUTURE AMENDMENTS.
Szcr. 1. Any amendment or amendments to this constitution may be proposed in
the senate or house of representatives; and, if the same shall be agreed to by a
majority of the members elected to each house, such proposed amendment or amend-
ments shall be entered on their journals, with the yeas and nays taken thereon, and
the secretary of the commonwealth shall cause the same to be published, three
months before the next general election, in at least two newspapers in every county
1 But a person riding on a free pass is not a an injury resulting from negligence. 3 Penny.
trespasser, and therefore, may recover damages for 190.
*
62 CONSTITUTION OF PENNSYLVANIA.
in which such newspapers shall be published ; and if, in the general assembly uext
afterwards chosen, such proposed amendment or amendments shall be agreed to by
a majority of the members elected to each house, the secretary of the commonwealth
shall cause the same again to be published in the manner aforesaid; and such pro-
posed amendment or amendments shall be submitted to the qualified electors of the
state, in such manner, and at such time, at least three months after being so agreed
to by the two houses, as the general assembly shall prescribe ; and it such amend-
ment or amendments shall be approved by a majority of those voting thereon, such
amendment or amendments shall become a part of the constitution ; but no amend-
ment or amendments shall be submitted oftener than once in five years. When two
or more amendments shall be submitted they shall be voted upon separately.
SCHEDULE)
THAT no inconvenience may arise from the changes in the constitution of the
commonwealth, and in order to carry the same into complete operation, it is hereby
declared, that—
Srct. 1. This constitution shall take effect on the first day of January, in the
year 1874, for all purposes not otherwise provided for therein.
Sxcr. 2. All laws in force in this commonwealth at the time of the adoption of
this constitution, not inconsistent therewith, and all rights, actions, prosecutions
and contracts, shall continue as if this constitution had not been adopted.
Sxor. 3. At the general election in the years 1874 and 1875, senators shall be
elected in all districts where there shall be vacancies. Those elected in the year
1874 shall serve for two years, and those elected in the year 1875 shall serve for
one year. Senators now elected, and those whose terms are unexpired, shall
represent the districts in which they reside, until the end of the terms for which
they were elected.
Sror. 4. At the general election in the year 1876, senators shall be elected from
even numbered districts, to serve for two years, and from odd numbered districts, to
serve for four years,
Sxot. 5. The first election of governor, under this constitution, shall be at the
general election in the year 1875, when a governor shall be elected for three years ;
and the term of the governor elected in the year 1878, and of those thereafter
elected, shall be for four years, according to the provisions of this constitution.
Sucr. 6. At the general election in the year 1874, a lieutenant-governor shall be
elected, according to the provisions of this constitution.
Snort. 7. The secretary of internal affairs shall be elected at the first general
election after the adoption of this constitution; and, when the said officer shall be
duly elected and qualified, the office of surveyor-general shall be abolished. The
surveyor-general in office at the time of the adoption of this constitution shall con-
tinue in office until the expiration of the term for which he was elected.
Sxor. 8. When the superintendent of public instruction shall be duly qualified
the office of superintendent of common schools shall cease.
Scr. 9. Nothing contained in this constitution shall be construed to render any
person now holding any state office for a first official term, ineligible for re-election
at the end of such term. :
Secr. 10. The judges of the supreme court in office whon this constitution shall
take effect, shall continue until their commissions severally expire. Two judges, in
addition to the number now composing the said court, shall be elected at the first
general election after the adoption of this constitution.
. Sxor. 11. All courts of record, and all existing courts which are not specified
in this constitution, shall continue in existence until the 1st day of December in
1 The schedule is not a part of the constitution; in office those
. ft whose offi i
its uses are temporary and auxiliary. 4 Luz. i by the constitution. i 0 Phin 0. bce i
Reg. 297; 7 Leg. Gaz. 406, It does not continue Penn. St. 154, nae,
CONSTITUTION OF PENNSYLVANIA. 63
the year 1875, without abridgment of their present jurisdiction, but no longer.
The court of first criminal jurisdiction for the counties of Schuylkill, Lebanon
and Dauphin, is hereby abolished ; and all causes and proceedings pending therein
in the county of Schuylkill, shall be tried and disposed of in the courts of oyer
and terminer and quarter sessions of the peace of said county.
Szor. 12. The registers’ courts now in existence shall be abolished on the first
day of January next succeeding the adoption of this constitution.
Secor. 13. The general assembly shall, at the next session after the adoption of
this constitution, designate the several judicial districts, as required by this consti-
tution. The judges in commission when such designation shall be made, shall
continue, during their unexpired terms, judges of the new districts in which they
reside; but when there shall be two judges residing in the same district, the pres-
ident judge shall elect to which district he shall be assigned, and the additional
law judge shall be assigned to the other district.
Szcr. 14. The general assembly shall, at the next succeeding session after each
decennial census, and not oftener, designate the several judicial districts, as required
by this constitution.
Sxor. 15. Judges learned in the law of any court of record, holding commissions
in force at the adoption of this constitution, shall hold their respective offices until
the expiration of the terms for which they were commissioned, and until their suc-
eessors shall be duly qualified. The governor shall commission the president judge
of the court of first criminal jurisdiction for the counties of Schuylkill, Lebanon
and Dauphin, as a judge of the court of common pleas of Schuylkill county, for
the unexpired term of his office.
Sect. 16. After the expiration of the term of any president judge of any court
of common pleas, in commission at the adoption of this constitution, the judge of
such court, learned in the law, and oldest in commission, shall be the president
judge thereof; and when two or more judges are elected at the same time, in
any judicial district, they shall decide by lot which shall be president judge; but
when the president judge of a court shall be re-elected, he shall continue to be
president judge of that court. Associate judges not learned in the law, elected
after the adoption of this constitution, shall be commissioned to hold their offices for
the term of five years from the first day of January next after their election.
Srcr. 17. The general assembly, at the first session after the adoption of this.
constitution, shall fix and determine the compensation of the judges of the supreme
court, and of the judges of the several judicial districts of the commonwealth ; and
the provisions of the thirteenth section of the article on legislation shall not be
deemed inconsistent herewith. Nothing contained in this constitution shall be held
to reduce the compensation now paid to any law judge of this commonwealth now
in commission. .
Scr. 18. The courts of common pleas in the counties of Philadelphia and Allegheny
shall be composed of the present judges of the district court and court of common
pleas of said counties, until their offices shall severally end, and of such other judges
as may, from time to time, be elected. For the purpose of first organization in
Philadelphia, the judges of the court number one, shall be Judges Allison, Pierce
and Paxson; of the court number two, Judges Hare, Mitchell, and one other judge
to be elected; of the court number three, Judges Ludlow, Finletter and Lynd; and
of the court number four, Judges Thayer, Briggs and one other judge, to be elected.
The judge first named shall be the president judge of said courts respect-
ively, and thereafter, the president judge shall be the judge oldest in commission;
but any president judge, re-elected in the same court or district, shall continue to
be president judge thereof. The additional judges for courts numbers two and
four, shall be voted for and elected at the first general election after the adoption
of this constitution, in the same manner as the two additional judges of the supreme
court, and they shall decide by lot to which court they shall'belong. Their term of
office shall commence on the first Monday of January in the year 1775.
Szor. 19. In the county of Allegheny, for the purpose of first organization
under this constitution, the judges of the court of common pleas, at the time of
1 This means “ oldest in continuous service :” this section is permanent in its provisions. 2 Del-
Co. R 324.
64 CONSTITUTION OF PENNSYLVANIA.
the adoption of this constitution, shall be the judges of the court number one,
and the judges of the district court, at the same date, shall be the judges of the
common pleas number two. The president judges of the common pleas and district
court shall be president judge of said courts number one and two, respectively,
until their offices shall end; and thereafter, the judge oldest in commission shall
be president judge; but any president judge re-elected in the same court or dis-
trict shall continue to be president judge thereof. . .
Sxor. 20. The organization of the courts of common pleas under this constitu-
tion, for the counties of Philadelphia and Allegheny, shall take effect on the first
Monday of January 1875, and existing courts in said counties shall continue, with
their present powers and jurisdiction, until that date; but no new suits shall be
instituted in the court of nisi prius after the adoption of this constitution.
Sxct. 21. The causes and proceedings pending in the court of nisi prius, court
of common pleas, and district court in Philadelphia, shall be tried and disposed of
in the court of common pleas. The records and dockets of said courts shall be
transferred to the prothonotary’s office of said county.
Sxct. 22. The causes and proceedings pending in the court of common pleas in
the county of Allegheny, shall be tried and disposed of in the court number one;
and the causes and proceedings pending in the district court, shall be tried and
disposed of in the court number two,
Srcr. 23. The prothonotary of the court of common pleas of Philadelphia shall
be first appointed by the judges of said court, on the first Monday of December in
the year 1875,.and the present prothonotary of the district court in said county
shall be the prothonotary of the said court of common pleas until said date, when
his commission shall expire; and the present clerk of the.court of oyer and termi-
ner and quarter sessions of the peace in Philadelphia shall be the clerk of such
court, until the expiration of his present commission, on the first Monday of
December in the year 1875.
Scr. 24. In cities containing over fifty thousand inhabitants, except Philadel-
phia, all aldermen in office at the time of the adoption of this constitution shall
continue in office until the expiration of their commissions; and at the election for
city and ward officers in the year 1875, one alderman shall be elected in each ward,
as provided in this constitution.
Secr. 25. In Philadelphia, magistrates, in lieu of aldermen, shall be chosen, as
required in this constitution, at the election in said city for city and ward officers,
in the year 1875 ; their term of office shall commence on the first Monday of April
succeeding their election. The terms of office of aldermen in said city, holding,
or entitled to, commissions at the time of the adoption of this constitution, shall
not be affected thereby.
Szor. 26. All persons in office in this commonwealth at the time of the adoption
of this constitution, and at the first election under it, shall hold their respective
offices until the term for which they have been elected or appointed shall expire,
and until their successors shall be duly qualified, unless otherwise provided in this
constitution. .
Suor. 27. The seventh article of this constitution prescribing an oath of office,
shall take effect on and after the first day of January 1875.
Sect. 28, The terms of office of county commissioners and county auditors, chosen
prior to the year 1875, which shall not have expired before the first Monday of
January in the year 1876, shall expire on that day.
Sor. 29. All state, county, city, ward, borough and township officers, in office at
the time of the adoption of this constitution, whose compensation is not provided
for by salaries alone, shall continue to receive the compensation allowed them by law,
until the expiration of their respective terms of office.
Szor. 30. All state and judicial officers heretofore elected, sworn, affirmed, or in
office when this constitution shall take effect, shall severally, within one month after
such adoption, take and subscribe an oath or affirmation to support this constitution.
Sgor. 31. The general assembly, at its first session, or as soon as may be after the
adoption of this constitution, shall pass such laws as may be nec
fe ‘ essary to carr
the same into full force and effect. 3 -
1 See 82 Penn. St. 396.
CONSTITUTION OF PENNSYLVANIA. 65
Scr. 82. The ordinance passed by this convention entitled “ An ordinance for
submitting the amended constitution of Pennsylvania to a vote of the electors
thereof,” shall be held to be valid, for all the purposes thereof.
Szcr. 33. The words ‘‘ county commissioners,’ wherever used in this constitution
and in any ordinance accompanying the same, shall be held to include the commis-
sioners for the city of Philadelphia.
Adopted at Philadelphia, on the third day of November, in the year of our Lord
one thousand eight hundred and seventy-three.
JOHN H. WALKER,
Aitest :— President. '
W. L. Imsrre,
Chief Clerk.
THE MAGISTRATES VOCABULARY
OF
LAW TERMS AND LAW PHRASES,
TRANSLATED AND EXPLAINED,
FROM THE MOST APPROVED AUTHORITIES.
LAW TERMS AND PHRASES
Such as are most frequently used, not only in courts of justice, and in magis-
trates’ offices, but among men of business, and in common conversation, the precise
meaning of which is not so generally understood as is desirable—explained and
their meanings given, according to the most modern and approved authorities.
ACCESSORY. An accessory is he
who is not the chief actor in the offence,
nor present at its performance; but is
some way concerned therein either before,
or after, the fact committed. An acces-
sory before the fact, is defined, by Sir
Matthew Hale, to be, one who being ab-
sent at the time of the crime committed,
doth yet procure, counsel or command
another to commit acrime. Herein ab-
sence is necessary to make him an acces-
sory ; for if such procurer, or the like, be
present, he is guilty of the crime as prin-
cipal. An accessory after the fact, may
be when a person, knowing a felony to
have been committed, receives, relieves,
comforts or assists, the felon. Therefore,
to make an accessory ex post facto [after
the fact], it is in the first place required
that he knows of the felony committed ;
in the next place, he must receive, relieve,
comfort or assist him—and generally
any assistance whatever, given to a felon,
to hinder his being apprehended, tried, or
suffering punishment, makes the assister
an accessory. 1 Hale H. P. C. 616, 618.
2 Hawk. P. C. c. 29, § 32. 4 Bl. Com.
35, 36, 37. Whart. Law Dict. 11.
ACCOMPLICE, one of many equally
concerned in a felony ; generally applied
to those who are admitted to give evi-
dence against their fellow criminals.
Whart. Law Dict. 14.
ACQUITTAL, a release or discharge ;
it most commonly signifies a deliverance
and setting free of a person from the
suspicion or guilt of an offence, as for
instance, he that on a trial is discharged
of a felony is said to be acquietatus de
felonia ; and if he be drawn in question
again for the same crime he may plead
autrefois acquit [before acquitted], as
his life shall not be twice put in danger
for the same offence. 2 Inst. 385.
Whart. Law Dict. 18.
ADJOURNMENT. The same with
the French word adjournment, and signi-
fies a putting off until another day, or to
another place. Cowel. Blount. An ad-
journment of Parliament [of congress or
the general assembly] is no more than a
continuance of the session from one time
to another. 1 Bl. Com. 185. Whart.
Law Dict. 29.
AFFIDAVIT. An affidavit isan oath
in writing, sworn before some judge, or
officer of a court, or other person, who
hath authority to administer such oath,
to evince the truth of certain facts therein
contained. 3 Bl. Com. 304. 1 Lill. Abr.
44. Whart. Law Dict. 32.
AFFRAY. An affray is the fighting
of two or more persons in some public
place, to the terror of his majesty’s sub-
jects [or, the people of this common-
wealth]; for, if the fighting be in private,
it is no affray, but an assault. 1 Hawk.
P. 0. ¢. 68. 4 Bl. Com. 145. Whart.
Law Dict.34. And there must beastroke
given or offered, or a weapon drawn,
otherwise it is no affray. 3 Inst. 158.
AGE is particularly used in law, for
(67).
68
those special times which enable persons
of both sexes to do certain acts, which
before, through want of years and judg-
ment, they are prohibited to do. As, for
example, a male at twelve years old may
take the oath of allegiance ; at fourteen,
is at years of discretion, and therefore,
may consent or disagree to marriage,
and may choose his guardian ; at seventeen,
muy be an executor; and at twenty-one,
is at his own disposal, and may alien his
lands, goods and chattels. A female,
also, at seven years of age, may be be-
trothed or given in marriage, at nine, is
entitled to dower; at twelve, is at years
of maturity, and therefore, may consent
or disagree to marriage ; at fourteen, is
at years of legal discretion, and may
choose a guardian ; at seventeen, may be
an executrix; and at twenty-one, may
dispose of herself and her lands. So
that full age, in male or female, is twenty-
one years; which age is completed on
the day preceding the anniversary of a
person’s birth ; who, till that time, is an
infant, and so styled in law. Oo. Litt.
78 b. 1 Bl. Com. 462. Whart. Law
Dict. 34.
AGREEMENT is the consent of two
or more persons, concerning the one in
parting with, and the other receiving
some property, right or benefit. 1 Bae.
Abr. Whart. Law Dict. 37.
ALDERMAN, see Halderman.
ALIMONY is that allowance the law
allows to the wife after a divorce a mens@
et thoro [from bed and board], and is
made to the woman for her support out
of her husband’s estate; being settled at
the discretion of the ecclesiastical [or
other] judge, on consideration of all the
circumstances of the case. 1 Bl. Com.
441. Whart. Law Dict. 39.
AMBASSADOR. An ambassador is
a person sent by one sovereign prince to
another, to transact, in the place of his
sovereign, such matters as relate to both
states.
Ambassadors are either ordinary or
extraordinary ; the ordinary ambassa-
dors are those who reside in the place
whither sent; and, as the time of their
return is indefinite, so is their business
uncertain ; arising from emergent occa-
sions: and commonly, the protection and
affairs of the merchants is their greatest
care. The extraordinary ambassadors,
are made pro tempore, and employed
upon some particular great affairs, as
condolements, congratulations, or for
MAGISTRATE’S VOCABULARY.
overtures of marriage, or the like. 4 Inst
153. Molloy 144. Whart. Law Dict. 42,
AMICUS CURIA. If a judge is
doubtful or mistaken in matter of law,
a stander-by may inform the court, as
amicus curiz [a friend of the court.]
Co. Litt. 178. Whart. Law Dict. 45.
ANNO DOMINI [the year of our
Lord]; the computation of time from the
inearpvation of Jesus Christ, which is
generally inserted in the dates of all
public writings. Jacob. Whart. Law
Dict. 4.
ARBITRATION is where the parties
injuring and injured submit all matters
in dispute concerning and personal chat-
tels, or personal wrong, to the judgment
of two or more arbitrators, who are to
decide the controversy ; and if they do
not agree, it is usual to add, that another
person be called in as wmpire, to whose
sole judgment it is then referred: or
frequently there is only one arbitrator
originally appointed. 3 Bl. Com. 16.
See Whart. Law Dict. 5.
ARBITRATOR, is a person indiffer-
ently chosen by third persons, between
whom there are any matters in dispute, to
determine all such matters in controversy,
according to his own judgment, whether
they relate to matter of law or fact.
Termes de la Ley 54. Whart. Law Dict.
60.
ARRAIGN, to call a man to answer in
form of law. To arraign a prisoner, is
nothing else but to call the prisoner to
the bar of the court, to answer the matter
charged upon him in an indictment. 4
Bl. Com. 322. Whart. Law Dict. 64.
Arraignment is necessary only in capital
cases. The trial may go on, in larceny,
without arraignment. 5 S. & R. 316.
Tn all cases of misdemeanor, a defendant
may appear and plead by attorney.
Ibid.
ARRAY, an old French word, signify-
ing the ranking or setting forth of a jury
of men impannelled on acause. 18 H.
VI., 14. And when we say to array a
panel, that is to set forth the men impan-
nelled one by another. F. N. B. 157.
Whart. Law Dict. 64. To challenge the
array of the panel, is at once to except
against all persons arrayed or impannelled,
in respect of partiality, or some default
in the sheriff [or county commissioners].
Co. Litt. 156 a. :
ARREST, a restraint of a man’s per-
son, obliging him to be obedient to the
LAW TERMS AND PHRASES.
law ; and it is defined to be the execution
of the command of some court of record,
or officer of justice. An arrest is the be-
ginning of imprisonment, where a man is
first taken and restrained of his liberty by
power of a lawful warrant. 2 Shep. Abr.
648. Wood’s Inst. 575. Arrests are
either in civil or criminal cases; and
there is this difference between the two,
that none shall be arrested for debt, tres-
pass, detinue or other cause of action, but
by virtue of a precept or commandment
out of some court ; but for treason, felony
or breaking of the peace, every man hath
authority to arrest without warrant or
precept. Termes de la Ley 52. Whart.
Dict. 65.
ARREST OF JUDGMENT. To
move an arrest of judgment, is to show
cause why judgment should not be stayed,
notwithstanding a verdict given. 3 Inst.
210. Whart. Law Dict. 65.
ASSETS, signifies goods and chattels
of a saleable nature, in the hands of the
executor or administrator, sufficient, or
enough, to make him chargeable to a
creditor or legatee, so far as such goods
and chattels extend. 2 Bl. Com. 511.
Whart. Law Dict. 67.
ASSIGNEE, one that is assigned
or appointed by another, to do any act, or
perform any business. It also signifies
one that taketh any right, title or inter-
est in things, by an assignment from an
assignor [the person who assigns]. Dyer
6. Whart. Law Dict. 69.
ASSUMPSIT is a voluntary promise,
made by word, by which a man assumes
or takes upon him to perform or pay any
thing to another; this word also compre-
hends any verbal promise made upon con-
sideration. Termes de la Ley 63. An
action of assumpsit is given to a party
injured by the breach or non-perform-
ance of a contract legally entered into ;
and it is founded on a contract either
express or implied by law, and gives the
party damages in proportion to the loss
he has sustained by the violation of the
contract. 1 Bac. Abr. Whart. Law
Dict. 71.
‘ATTORNEY-AT-LAW is a person
duly admitted in the courts, and who is
appointed by another person, usually
denominated his client, to prosecute or
defend some suit on his behalf; and he
is considered as a public officer belong-
ing to the courts of justice in which he
may be admitted. 3 Bl. Com. 25. Whart.
Law Dict. 73.
69
BACKING OF WARRANTS is
the signing of an authority on the back
thereof, by a magistrate of a different
county from that mentioned in the body
thereof, empowering the officer to execute
the same in such other county. 4 BI.
Com. 291. Whart. Law Dict. 80.
BALL is used, in our common law, for
the freeing, or setting at liberty, of one
arrested or imprisoned upon action, either
civil or criminal, on surety taken for his
appearance at a day and place certain.
Bract. lib. 8. In civil cases, there is both
common and special bail: common bail
is in actions of small concern; and it is
called common, because any sureties, in
that case, are taken. Whereas, in causes
of greater weight, as actions upon bonds
or specialty, or other matters, where the
debt amounts to £10, special bail, or
surety, may be taken. 4 Inst. 179.
Whart. Law Dict. 80.
BAILMENT is a delivery of goods in
trust, upon a contract, expressed or im-
plied, that the trust shall be faithfully
executed on the part of the bailee [the
person to whom the goods are delivered].
As, if cloth be delivered, or (in our legal
dialect) bazled to a tailor, to make a suit
of clothes, he has it upon an implied con-
tract, to render it again when made, and
that ina workman-like manner, 2 BI.
Com. 451. Whart. Law Dict. 82.
BARON AND FEME are husband
and wife. Co. Litt. 112. 1 Bl. Com.
441. Whart. Law Dict. 87.
BARRISTER, a counsellor learned in
the law; admitted to plead at the bar,
and there to take upon him the protection
and defence of clients. Fortescue. Whart.
Law Dict. 88.
BATTERY is an injury done to another
in a violent manner, as by striking or
beating of a man, pushing, jolting, &.
And it is also defined by our law to be a
trespass committed by one man upon
another, vt et armis et contra pacem, &ec.
Termes de la Ley 85. Whart. Law Dict.
89.
BIGAMY signifies a double marriage,
or marriage af two wives, one after
another; and not the having of two
together, more properly called polygamy.
3 Inst, 88. 4 Bl. Com. 163. Whart.
Law Dict. 93.
BILL single or penal, is a writing under
seal, wherein one man is bound to another,
to pay a sum of money on a day that is
70 ‘ MAGISTRATE’S
future, or presently on demand, according
to the agreement of the parties at the
time it is entered into, and the dealings
between them: and is divided into two
sorts, viz. a bill single, without a penalty,
and a bill penal, under a penalty. Rol.
Abr. 148.
BOND is a deed or obligatory instru-
ment, in writing, whereby one doth bind
himself, his heirs, executors and admin-
istrators, to another, to pay a sum of
money, or to do some other act, as to make
a release, surrender an estate, for quiet
enjoyment, to stand to an award, save
harmless, perform a will, or the like. It
contains an obligation with a penalty, and
a condition which expressly mentions
what money is to be paid, or other things
to be performed, and the limited time for
the performance thereof, for which the
obligation is peremptorily binding. 2
Bl. Com. 339. Whart. Law Dict. 103.
BRIBERY is where a person in a ju-
dicial place takes any fee, gift, reward or
brocage [brokerage]. for doing his office,
other than that which is lawful. 3 Inst,
145. But taken largely it signifies the
receiving or offering, any undue reward
to or by any person concerned in the
administration of public justice, whether
judge, officer or the like, to act contrary
to his duty ; and sometimes it signifies the
taking or giving a reward for a public
offence. 3 Inst. 9. Whart. Law Dict.
109.
BROKERS are those that contrive,
make and conclude bargains and con-
tracts, between merchants and tradesmen,
in matters of money and merchandise,
for which they have a fee or reward.
Cowel. Blount. Whart. Law Dict. 110.
CAPTION, When any commission at
law, or in equity, is executed, the com-
missioners subscribe their names to a cer-
tificate, testifying when and where the
commission was executed; and this is
called a caption. Also, when a man is ar-
rested, the act of taking him is termed
a caption. There is, also, the caption of
an indictment, which is the setting forth
of the style of the court before which the
jurors made their presentment. Jacob.
Whart. Law Dict. 121.
CASH (sale for), In Pennsylvania, if
one sell goods for cash, and the vendee
[the purchaser] take them away, without
payment of the money, the vendor [the
seller] may pursue the party and retake
VOCABULARY.
them; and he would be justified in doing
so by force. 1 Yeates 527.
CAVEAT EMPTOR is a maxim which
enters into every purchase, where the
contrary is not stipulated, and equity can-
not relieve against it, any more than it
can against the terms of a bargain. 3
P. & W.446. See Whart. Law Dict. 126,
CLERGY, BENEFIT OF. By stat,
3 Edw. I., c. 3, it is enacted, that for the
scarcity of clergy in the realm of Eng-
land to be disposed of in religious houses,
or for priests, deacons and clerks of par-
ishes, there should be a prerogative al-
lowed to the clergy ; that if any man, that
could read as aclerk, were tobe condemned
to death, the bishop of the diocese might,
if he would, claim him as a clerk; and
he was to see him tried in the face of
the court, if he could read or not ; if the
prisoner could read, then he was to be
delivered over to the bishop, who would
dispose of him in some place of the clergy,
as he should think meet; but if either
the bishop would not demand him, or the
prisoner could not read, then he was to be
put to death. 2 Hale H. P. C. 377.
Whart. Law Dict. 91.
COHABITATION. For civil purposes,
reputation and cohabitation are sufficient
evidence of marriage. 1 P. & W. 450.
COMMISSION. The commission of
a justice, or a judge, is conclusive evi-
dence of his appointment. Peters’ C. C.
188.
COMMITMENT is the sending of a
person to prison, by warrant or order, who
hath been guilty of any crime. 4 Bl.
Com. 296. Whart. Law Dict. 160.
COMMON LAW. The common law
is grounded upon the general customs of
the realm, and includes in it, the law
of nature, the law of God, and the prin-
ciples and maxims of the law; it is
founded upon reason; and is said to be
the perfection of reason acquired by long
study, observation and’ experience, ‘and
refined by learned men in all ages. Co.
Litt, 97, 142. 1 Bl. Com. 63, et seq.
Whart. Law Dict. 161. :
COMPETENCY (Witnesses). The
general rule is, that all are competent as
witnesses who are both able and willing
to declare the truth. Consequently, the
circumstances, which wholly disqualify a
person as a witness, are, lst the want of
religious belief, such as renders the party
incapable of the obligation of an oath ; 2d,
LAW TERMS AND PHRASES.
the infamy of his character: 3d, certain
legal relations between the party and
witness. 2 Stark. Hv. 392.
COMPOUNDING FELONY, or theft
bote, is where the party robbed, not only
knows the felon, but also takes his goods
again, or other amends, upon agreement
not to prosecute. 1 Hawk. P. C. c. 59,
§ 5. Whart. Law Dict. 163.
CONSPIRACY is an agreement of two
or more persons, falsely to indict one, or
to procure him to be indicted, for felony,
riot or other misdemeanor; who, after
acquittal, shail have a writ of conspiracy.
Termes de la Ley 1738. Whart. Law
Dict. 171.
CONTINUANCE. A party who neg-
lects, up to the day of hearing by a justice,
to take out a subpoena, or resort to the
proper legal steps to obtain the attend-
ance of his witnesses, is not legally enti-
tled to a continuance. 1 Ash. 221.
CONVERSION is where a person has
found another's goods and refuses to de-
liver them, on demand, but converts them
to his own use. 3 Bl. Com. 152. Whart.
Law Dict. 181.
COURT. A justice of the peace must,
necessarily, have his court, or place of
administering justice, at which his duties
ought to be performed. 1 P, & W. 15.
COURT OF ADMIRALTY is a court
erected for deciding maritime causes. It
hath jurisdiction only to determine causes
arising wholly upon the sea out of the
jurisdiction of a county. 4 Inst. 260.
Whart. Law Dict. 25.
CREDIT. If I usually deal with a
tradesman by myself, or constantly pay
him ready money, I am not answerable
for what my servant takes upon trust, for
there is noimplied order to the tradesman
to trust my servant; but if I usually send
him upon trust, or sometimes on trust,
and sometimes with ready money, I am
answerable for all he takes up; for the
tradesman cannot possibly distinguish
when ‘he comes by my order, and when
upon his own authority. 1 Bl. Com. 430.
CRIME is a positive breach or disre-
gard of some existing public law, and
generally means such offences as amount
toa felony. 4 Bl. Com. 5. Whart. Law
Dict. 196.
CUSTOM AND USAGE. To make
a custom or usage of trade obligatory,
as a law of that trade, it must be certain,
71
uniform, reasonable and sufficiently an.
cient, to be generally known.
DAMAGE signifies generally any
hurt or hindrance that a man receives in
his estate; but in a particular sense, it is
applied to what the jurors are to inquire
‘of and bring in, when any action passeth
for the plaintiff. Co. Litt. 257. Whart.
Law Dict. 205.
Damages are a species of property ac-
quired and lost by suit and judgment at
law, and are given to a man by a jury, as
a compensation and satisfaction for some
injury sustained; as for battery, for im-
prisonment, for slander, for trespass. 2
Bl. Com. 438.
DATE of a deed is the description of
the time ; viz. the day, month, year of our
Lord, year of the reign in which the deed
was made. Co. Litt. 6. Whart. Law Dict.
208.
DAY, is ‘a certain space of time con-
taining twenty-four hours: the natural
day consists of twenty-four hours, and
contains the solar day and the night; and
the artificial day begins from the rising
of the sun, and ends when it sets. Co. Litt.
135. Whart. Law Dict. 208.
DEBT, in the usual acceptance of the
word, is a sum of money due from one
person to another. But in the legal sense,
it is taken to be an action which lieth
where a man oweth another a certain sum
of money, by obligation or bargain, for a
thing sold, or by contract, &c., and the
debtor will not pay the debt at the day
agreed. Selw. N. P. 484. Whart. Law
Dict. 211.
DEDIMUS POTESTATEM, is a writ
issued out of the court of chancery [or
other court], to commissioners, anthoriz-
ing them to take an answer, to examine
witnesses in a cause, to levy a fine in the
common pleas, &c. Also, when any
justice intends to act under any commis-
sion of the peace, he sues out a writ of
dedimus potestatem, from the clerk of the
crown in chancery, empowering certain
persons, therein named, to administer the
usual oaths to him, which done, he is at
liberty to act. 1 Bl. Com. 351. Whart.
Law Dict. 215.
DEED, is an instrument in writing, on
parchment or paper, and under seal, con-
taining some conveyance, contract, bar-
gain or agreement between the parties
thereto ; and it consists of three principal
72
points, writing, sealing and delivering.
Co. Litt. 171. 2 Bl. Com. 295. Whart.
Law Dict. 215.
DEFAMATION is the offence of
speaking slanderous words of another.
Termes de la Ley 233. Whart, Law Dict.
218.
DEFAULT is commonly taken for
non-appearance in court ata day assigned,
though it extends to any omission of that
which we ought to do. Oo. Litt. 259.
Whart. Law Dict. 219.
DEFENDANT is the party that is
sued in a personal action; as tenant is he
that is sued in an action real. Cowel.
Blount. Whart. Law Dict. 220.
DEMAND, signifies a calling upon 4
man for anything due. 8 Co.153. Whart.
Law Dict. 223.
DEPOSITION is the testimony of a
witness, otherwise called a deponent, put
down in writing, by way of answer to in-
terrogatories [or questions asked], exhib-
ited for that purpose in courts of equity ;
and the copies of such depositions regu-
larly taken and published, are read as
evidence at the hearing of the cause.
Pract. Attorn., edit. 1, p. 234. See Whart.
Law Dict. 227.
DILATORY PLEAS are such as are
put merely for delay ; as coverture, mis-
nomer and the like. 3 Bl. Com. 301.
Whart. Law Dict. 282.
DISCHARGE on writs and process,
&c., is where a man confined by some
legal writ or authority, doth that which
by law he is required to do; whereupon
he is released or discharged from the
matter for which he was confined. 1 Lill.
Abr. 470.
DISTRESS, in the most general sense,
is anything which is taken and distrained
for rent behind or in arrear. 2 Bl. Com.
42. Selw. Nisi Prius 612. Whart. Law
Dict. 238.
DIVORCE is a separation of a man
and a woman who have been, de facto,
married together, made by law, and is of
two kinds; the one total, the other par-
tial; the one @ vinculo matrimonii, the
other, merely d mens@ et thoro. 1 BI.
Com. 439. Whart. Law Dict. 241.
DOCKET, or DOGGET, a record in
the courts, containing an entry of judg-
ment: thus, when rolls of judgment are
brought in they are docketed, 7. e. entered
on the docket of that term. West Symb.
par. 2, §106. Whart. Law Dict. 241.
MAGISTRATE’S VOCABULARY.
DONOR and DONEE. Donor is he
who gives lands or tenements to another
in tail, &c. And the person to whom
given is the donee. Termes de la Ley
287. Whart. Law Dict. 244.
DOWER is the portion which a widow
hath of the lands of her husband, after
his decease, for the sustenance of herself,
and the education of her children. Co.
Litt. 30. Whart. Law Dict. 247.
DUCES TECUM is a writ out of
chancery, commanding a person to appear
at a certain day, in court, and to bring
with him some writings, evidences, or
other things, to be inspected and exam-
ined in court. Reg. Orig. Whart. Law
Dict. 252.
DUPLICATE signifies a copy or tran-
script of any deed, writing or account.
St.1 Car.I., ¢.10. Whart. Law Dict. 254.
EALDERMAN was a man chosen to
a place of superiority on account of his
age and experience ; as the Senators were
among the Romans: and hence the word
alderman, in corporations ; and the word
earl, which is only a contraction of eald-
erman. 1 Bl. Com. 367. Whart. Law
Dict. 255.
EAVES-DROPPEBRS are such as lis-
ten under walls or windows, or the eaves
of a house, to hearken after discourse, and
thereupon to frame slanderous and mis-
chievous tales. 4 Bl. Com. 168, Whart.
Law Dict. 256.
ESCROW is where the delivery of a
deed is made to a third person, to hold
till some conditions be performed on the
part of the grantee [the person to whom
the sale has been made] ; in which case,
it is not delivered as a deed, but as an
escrow; that is, as a scroll or writing
which is not to take effect as a deed, till
the conditions be performed ; and then it
is a deed to all intents and purposes.
Co. Litt. 36. 2 Bl. Com. 307. Whart.
Law Dict. 276.
EXACTION, a wrong done by an offi-
cer taking a reward, or fee, for that which
the law does not allow. And the differ-
ence between exaction and extortion is
this: extortion is where an officer extorts
more than his due, where something ts due
to him: and exaction is where he wrests
a fee or reward, where none ts due: for
which the offender is to be fined and im-
prisoned, and render to the party twice
as much as the money he so takes, (Co.
Litt. 368. Whart. Law Dict. 279.
LAW TERMS AND PHRASES.
EXECUTOR DE SON TORT, or
executor of his own wrong, is he that
takes upon him the office of an executor
by intrusion, not being so constituted by
the testator ; or, for want thereof, appoint-
ed by the ordinary [register] to adminis-
ter. Dyer 166. Selw. Nisi Prius 706.
Whart. Law Dict. 287.
EX OFFICIO, an act done in execu-
tion of the power which a person has by
virtue of an office, to doin certain cases,
and without being applied to ; thus, a jus-
tice of the peace may not only grant
surety of the peace upon the complaint
or request of any person ; but he may de-
mand, and take it ex officio, at discretion,
&c. Dalt. 270. Whart. Law Dict. 289.
EX PARTE, party of the one part ;
as a commission ex parte, in chancery ;
which is a commission taken out and
executed by one side or party only, on
the other party’s neglecting or refusing
to join. Cowel. Blount. Whart. Law
Dict. 290.
EX POST FACTO is a term used
in the law, signifying something done
after the time when it should have been
done; thus, an act done, or estate granted,
may be made good by matter ex post
facto, that was not so at first, by election,
&e. 5 Co. 22.
EX POST FACTO LAWS are such
as are made to operate on facts committed
before the making thereof, by creating or
aggravating crime, increasing the punish-
ment, or changing the rules of evidence
for the purpose of conviction. 3 Dall. 390.
The phrase, as used in the constitution,
only applies to penal and criminal laws
which inflict forfeitures or punishments,
not to civil proceedings. 8 Pet. 110.
FALSE IMPRISONMENT signifies
a violent trespass, committed against a
person, by arresting and imprisoning him
without just cause, contrary to law; or
where a man is unlawfully detained in
prison, without legal process; or kept
longer in hold than he ought; or if he
be any way unlawfully detained. Oo.
Litt. 124. Selw. Nisi Prius 814. Whart.
Law Dict. 295.
FEE SIMPLE is an estate of inherit-
ance, whereby a person is seised of lands,
tenements or hereditaments, to hold to
him and his heirs for ever, generally,
absolutely and simply. 2 Bl. Com. 103.
Whart. Law Dict. 297.
FELO DE SE. When a person with
73
deliberation and direct purpose kills him-
self by hanging, drowning, shooting,
stabbing, &c., this is felo de se, if he be
of the age of discretion, z. e. fourteen,
and compos mentis [of sound mind]. 38
Inst. 44. Dalt. ch. 145. Whart. Law
Dict. 300.
FELONY, in the general acceptation
of our English law, comprises every spe-
cies of crime which occasioned, at common
law, the forfeiture of lands or goods. This
most frequently happens in those crimes
for which a capital punishment either is,
or was, liable to be inflicted; for those
felonies which are called clergyable, or to
which the benefit of clergy extends, were
anciently punished with death in all lay
or unlearned offenders ; though now, by
the statute-law, that punishment is, for
the first offence, universally remitted.
Treason itself, says Sir Edward Coke,
was anciently comprised under the name
of felony. All treasons, therefore, strictly
speaking, are felonies; though all felo-
mies are not treason ; and to this also we
may add, not only all offences, now capi-
tal, are, in some degree or other felony ;
but that this is likewise the case with
some other offences which are not punished
with death, as suicide, where the party is
already dead; homicide, by chance-med-
ley, or in self-defence; and petit larceny
or pilfering ; all which are, strictly speak-
ing, felonies ; as they subject the commit-
ters of them to forfeitures. So that, upon
the whole, the only adequate definition of
felony seems to be, that which is before
laid down, vig., an offence which occa-
sions a total forfeiture of either lands or
goods, or both, at the common law, and
to which capital, or other punishment
may be superadded, according to the de-
grees of guilt. 3 Inst. 15. 4 Bl. Com
94. Whart. Law Dict. 300.
FEMES COVERT [married women],
and infants [under twenty-one years of
age], ought to find bail, and not be bound
themselves:
A feme covert cannot contract and be
sued as a feme sole [single woman], even
though she be living apart from her hus-
band, having a separate maintenance
secured to her by deed. 7 T. R. 545.
Who are deemed feme sole traders in
Pennsylvania, see Purd. 801.
FORCIBLE ENTRY AND DE.
TAINER. The first is a violent actual
entry into houses or lands; and forcible
detainer is a withholding, by violence,
74
and with strong hand, of the possession
of land, &c., whereby, he who hath a
right of entry is barred or hindered.
Lamb. 135. Cromp. 75. Keilw. 22.
Whart. Law Dict. 311. See “ Forcible
Entry and Detainer.”
FORGERY signifies where a person
fraudulently makes and publishes false
writings, to the prejudice of another man’s
right ; and forgery is either at common
law or by statute. Forgery by the com-
mon law, extends to false and fraudulent
making or altering of a deed or writing,
whether it be matter of record, or any
other writing, deed orwill. 3 Inst. 169.
1 Rol. Abr. 65. And Blackstone detines
it to be “the fraudulent making or
alteration of a writing to the prejudice
of another man’s right.” 4 Com. 245.
Whart. Law Dict. 314.
FRAUD is defined to be a decezt in
grants and conveyances of lands and bar-
gains, and sales of goods, &c., to the
damage of another person. Bacon’s
Abr. 3. Whart. Law. Dict. 317.
FUGITIVE FROM JUSTICE. One
who steals goods in another state and
brings them with him into Pennsylvania
cannot be indicted here for the felony.
He is to be considered and treated as a
fugitive from justice. 5 Binn. 617.
FULL AGE. In law, the full age of
males and females is twenty-one years.
1 Bl. Com. 462.
GAOLER. A gaoler [jailer] is the
servant of the sheriff, and the master or
governor of a prison ; and, as sucb, is con-
sidered as an officer relating to the admin-
istration of justice. 3 Rol. Abr. 76. 1
Bl. Com. 845. Whart. Law Dict. 326.
HOMICIDE, is the destroying the life
of any human creature; it is of three
kinds, viz., justifiable, eacusable and fe-
donious. The first has no share of guilt
at all; the second very little; but the
third is the highest against the law of
nature that man is capable of committing.
First, justifiable homicide is of divers
kinds. 1. Such as is owing to some una-
voidable necessity, without any will, inten-
tion or desire, and without any inad-
vertence or negligence in the party
killing; and therefore, without any shadow
of blame. As, for instance, by virtue of
such an office as obliges one, in the exe-
cution of public justice, to put a male-
factor to death, who hath forfeited his
life, by the laws and verdict of his country,
Again, in some cases, homicide is justifi-
MAGISTRATE’S VOCABULARY.
able, rather by the permission, than by
the absolute command, of the law, either
for the advancement of public justice,
which, without such indemnification,
would never be carried on with proper
vigor; or in such instances where it is
committed for the prevention of some
atrocious crime which cannot otherwise
be avoided. Homicides committed for
the advancement of public justice are, 1.
Where an officer, in the execution of his
office, either in a civil or criminal case,
kills a person that assaults and resists him,
2. If an officer, or any private person,
attempts to take a man charged with fel-
ony, and is resisted, and in the endeavor
to take him kills him. 3. In ease of a
riot, or rebellious assembly, the officers
endeavoring to disperse the mob are jus-
tifiable in killing them, both at common
law and by the riot ‘act. 1 Geo. I., ¢. 5,
§ 4. Where the prisoners in a jail,
assault the jailer, or officer, and he, in his
defence, kills any of them, it is justifi-
able, for the sake of preventing an escape.
5. If trespassers in forests, parks, chases
or warrens will not surrender themselves
to the keepers, they may be slain by vir-
tue of the Stat. 21 Edw. I., de malefac-
toribus in pacis, and 3 & 4W.&M.ec.
10. 6. If the champions, in a trial by
battle, killed either of them the other,
such homicide was justifiable, and was
imputed to the just judgment of God,
‘who was thereby presumed to have de-
cided in favor of the truth. In the next
place, such homicide, as is committed for
the prevention of any forcible and atro-
cious crime, is justifiable by the law of
nature, and also by the law of England
[and of Pennsylvania]. If any person
attempts a robbery or murder of another,
or attempts to break open a house, én the
night time, which extends also to an
attempt to burn it, and shall be killed in
such attempt, the slayer shall be acquit-
ted and discharged, &c.
Secondly, excusable homicide is of two
sorts, either per infortuntum, by misad-
venture, or se defendendo, upon a princi-
ple of self-preservation. 1. Homicide per
infortunium, or misadventure, is where a
man doing alawful act, without any inten-
tion of hurt, unfortunately kills another;
as where a man is at work with a hatchet,
and the head thereof flies off and kills a
stander-by, or where a person qualified
to keep a gun is shooting at a mark and
undesignedly kills a man, for the act is
lawful, and the effect is merely accidental,
LAW TERMS AND PHRASES.
&e. 2. Homicide in self-defence, or se
defendendo, upon a sudden affray, is also
excusable, rather than justifiable, by the
English [and Pennsylvania] law. This
species of self-defence must be distin-
guished from that just now mentioned as
calculated to hinder the perpetration of a
capital crime, which is not only a matter
of excuse, but of justification. But the
self-defence which we are now speaking
of is that whereby a man may protect
himself from an assault, or the like, in the
case of sudden brawl or quarrel, by kill-
ing him who assaults him. And this is
what the law expresses by the word
chance-medley, or (as some rather choose
to write it) chaud-medley. 3. Felonious
homicide is an act of a very different
nature from the former, being the kill-
ing of a human creature, of any age, or
sex, without justification or excuse. This
may be done either by killing one’s self,
or another man. Self-murder, the law of
England hath ranked among the highest
crimes, making it a peculiar species of
felony ; a felony committed on one’s self.
And this admits of accessories before the
fact, as well as other felonies; for if one
persuades another to kill himself, and he
does so, the adviser is guilty of murder.
A felo de se, therefore, is he, who delib-
erately puts an end to his own existence,
or commits any unlawful, malicious act,
the consequence of which is his own
death ; as, if attempting to kill another,
he runs upon his antagonist’s sword; or
shooting at another, the gun bursts, and
he kills himself. The other species of
criminal homicide is that of killing
another man. But in this there are also
degrees of guilt which divide the offence
into manslaughter and murder.
The difference between which consists
in this, that manslaughter arises from the
sudden heat of the passions, murder from
the wickedness of the heart. Manslaugh-
ter is, therefore, thus defined, the unlawful
killing of another without malice, either
express or implied ; which may be either
voluntary, upon a sudden heat, or invo-
luntary, but in the commission of some
unlawful act. As to the first, or voluntary
branch: if upon a sudden quarrel two
persons fight and one of them kills the
other, this is manslaughter ; and so it is
if they, upon such an occasion, go out
and fight in a field, for this is one con-
tinued act of passion. So also, if a man
be greatly provoked, as by pulling his
nose, or other great indignity, and imme-
75
diately kills the aggressor, though this is
not excusable, se defenilendo, since there
is no absolute necessity for doing it to
preserve himself, yet neither is it murder,
for there is no previous malice, but it is
manslaughter. But in this, and in every
other case of homicide upon provocation,
if there be a sufficient cooling time for
passion to subside and reason to interpose,
and the person, so provoked, afterwards
kills the other, this is deliberate revenge
and not heat of blood, and accordingly
amounts to’ murder, &. The second
branch, or involuntary manslaughter, dif-
fers also from homicide excusable by mis-
adventure, in this; that misadventure
always happens in consequence of a lawful
act ; but this species of manslaughter in
consequence of an unlawful one. As, if
two persons play at sword and buckler,
unless by the king’s command, and one of
them kills the other, this is manslaughter,
because the original act was unlawful; but
it is not murder, for the one had no intent
to do the other any personal mischief,
&c. 1 Hale H. P. C.494,5,6. 1 Hawk.
P. C. c. 28, c. 65. Fost. 296. 3 Inst. 56.
1 BI. Com. 176, e¢ seg. Whart, Law Dict.
353.
HOUSEHOLDER, the occupier of a
house. Cowel. Blount. Whart. Law
Dict. 356.
&
IGNORAMUS, the return of the
grand jury on a bill of indictment, when
they reject the evidence as too weak or
defective to put the party on trial. 3 Inst.
30. Whart. Law Dict. 364.
IMPANNEL signifies the writing and
entering into a parchment schedule, by
the sheriff, the names of ajury summoned
to appear for the performance of such
public service as juries are employed in.
Cowel. Blount. Whart. Law Dict. 365.
IMPEACHMENT is the accusation
and prosecution of a person in parliament
{or the general assembly] for treason or
other crime and misdemeanor. 4 Bl. Com
259. Whart. Law Dict. 366.
IMPRISONMENT is the restraint of
a man’s liberty, under the custody of an-
other, and extends not only to a jail. but
to a house, stocks, or where a man is held
in the street, &c.; for, in all these cases,
the party, so restrained, is said to be a
prisoner, 80 long as he hath not his liberty
freely to go about his business as at other
times. Co. Litt. 253. Whart. Law Dict
368.
76 MAGISTRATE’S
INCEST is the carnal knowledge of a
person within the Levitical degree of
kindred. 4 Bl. Com. 64. Whart. Law
Dict. 369.
INDICTED, When the grand jury
have found a true bill against any one
accused by bill preferred to them at the
king’s suit, for some indictable offence,
he is said to be indicted thereof. Cowel.
Whart. Law Dict. 370.
INDICTMENT is a bill of complaint,
or accusation, drawn up in form of law,
and exhibited for some offence, criminal
or penal, to a grand jury; upon whose
oaths it may be found to be true. Lamb.
lib. 4, cap. 5. Whart. Law Dict. 370.
INFORMER, a person who informs
against, or presents in the king’s courts
[courts of the commonwealth], for an
offence against any law or penal statute.
2 Bl. Com. 437. Whart. Law Dict. 376.
INVENTORY is a list or schedule,
containing a true description of al the
goods and chattels of a deceased person,
at the time of his death, with their value
appraised by indifferent persons. Termes
de la Ley 428. Whart. Law Dict. 396.
LAND legally comprehends all things
of a permanent, substantial nature, being
a word of a very extensive signification ;
indeed, Sir Edward Coke says, ‘‘it com-
prehendeth any ground, soil or earth
whatsoever, as arable meadows, pastures,
woods, moors, waters, marshes, furzes
and heath. It legally includeth also all
castles, houses and other buildings; for
they consist (saith he) of two things,
land which is the foundation, and struc-
ture thereupon; so that if I convey
the land or ground, the structure or
building passeth therewith. Co. Litt, 4.
2 Bl. Com. 16,17. Whart. Law Dict.
420.
LANDLORD is he of whom lands or
tenements are holden. Co. Litt. 57, 205.
Whart. Law Dict. 421.
LAW, in its most general and compre-
hensive sense, signifies a rule of action ;
and is applied indiscriminately toall kinds
of action, whether animate or inanimate,
rational or irrational. Thus, we say, the
laws of motion, of gravitation, of optics,
or mechanics, as well as the laws of nature
and of nations. And it is that rule of ac-
tion which is prescribed by some superior,
and which the infertor is bound to obey.
Municipal or civil law, is the rule by
which particular districts, communitics or
VOCABULARY.
nations, are governed ; being thus defined
by Justinian, “ Jus civile est quod quis-
que sibi populus constituit.” [‘ The civil
law is that which every nation has estab-
lished for its own government.” ] Muni
cipal law, thus understood, is properly
defined to be, a rule of civil conduct pre-
scribed by the supreme power in a state,
commanding what is right, and probibit-
ing what is wrong. 1 Bl. Com. 38. Co.
Litt. 11. 1 Bl. Com. 43.
The municipal law of England, or the
rule of civil conduct prescribed to the in-
habitants of this kingdom, may, with suf-
ficient propriety, says Sir William Black-
stone, be divided into two kinds: the lex
non scripta, the unwritten or common law;
and the /ex scripta, the written or statute
law. «The lex non scripta, or unwritten
law, includes not only general customs, o1
the common law properly so called, but
also the particular customs of certain parts
of the kingdom, and likewise those pur-
ticular laws that are, by custom, observed
only in certain courts and jurisdictions.
1 Bl. Com. 63. The leges scriptz, or tha
written laws of the kingdom, consist of
statutes, acts or edicts, made by the king’s
majesty, by and with the advice and con-
sent of the lords spiritual and temporal,
and commons, in parliament assembled.
Ibid. 84. Hale’s Com. Law, ec. 1, 2.
LEASE. A lease is properly a con-
veyance of any lands or tenements (usu-
ally in consideration of rent or other ap-
nual recompense), made for life, for years,
or at will, but always for a dess time than
the lessor hath in the premises ; for if it
be for the whole interest it is more pro-
perly an assignment than a lease. 2 BI.
Com. 317. Whart. Law Dict. 428.
LIBEL signifies literally a little book
A libel is defined to be a malicious defa-
mation of any person, especially a magis-
trate, expressed either in printing or writ-
ing, or by signs, pictures, &c., tending
either to blacken the memory of one whe
is dead, or the reputation of one who is
alive, and thereby exposing him to public
hatred, contempt or ridicule. 2 Hawk.
192. Selw. N. P. 931. Whart. Law
Dict. 440.
LIEN isa specific charge on real or
personal property. A read lien is a judg-
ment, statute, recognisance, or an original
claim against an heir, which binds the
land; a personal lien is a bond, covenant,
or contract. Termes de la Ley 416, There
are two species of liens known to the law,.
LAW TERMS AND PHRASES.
namely, particular hens and general liens.
Particular liens are where persons claim
a right to retain goods in respect of labor
or money expended on such goods. Cen-°
eral liens are claimed in respect of a gen-
eral balance of account, and are founded
in custom only. Selw. Nisi Prius 737 n.,
1210. Whart. Law Diet. 443. In Penn-
by different acts of assembly, to particu-
sylvania there are a variety of liens given
lar descriptions of persons and for special
purposes.
MALICE, when spoken of in relation to
the crime of murder, is not to be under-
stood in so restrained a sense as to signify
onlya spite or malevolence to the deceased
person in particular, but more largely, an
evil design in general, the dictate of a
wicked, depraved and malignant heart.
It is of two kinds: express or implied.
Malice express is when one, with a sedate,
deliberate mind, doth kill another ; which
formed design is evidenced by external
circumstances, discovering that inward
intention, as lying in wait, antecedent
menaces, former grudges and concerted
schemes to do him some bodily harm.
Malice implied is various: as when one
voluntarily kills another, without any pro-
vocation; or when one wilfully poisons
another; in such like cases, the law
implies matice, though no particular
enmity can be proved. 4 Bl. Com. 198.
Whart. Law Dict. 466, See “ Homi-
cide.”
MANSLAUGHTER is such a killing
of a man as happens either on a sudden
quarrel, or in the commission of an unlaw-
ful act, without any deliberate intention
of doing any mischief at all. There is no
difference between murder and man-
slaughter, but that murder is upon malice
aforethought, and manslaughter upon a
sudden occasion. As if two meet to-
gether, and, striving for the wall, the one
kills the other, this is manslaughter and
felony. And so itis, if they had, upon
that sudden occasion, gone into the field
and fought, and the one had killed the
other, this had been but manslaughter
and no murder; because all that followed
was but a continuance of the first sudden
occasion, and the blood was never cooled
till the blow was given. 3 Inst. 55.
Whart. Law Dict. 469. See“ Homicide.”
MESNE PROCESS is sometimes put
in contradistinction to original process,
and, in that sense, it signifies an interme-
diate process, which issues, pending the
77
f
suit, upon some collateral interlocutory
matter, as to summon juries, witnesses,
and the like ; sometimes, it is put in con-
tradistinction to final process or proeess
of execution ; and then itsignifies all such
process as intervenes between the begin-
ning and end of a suit. 3 BI. Com. 279.
Whart. Law Dict. 487.
MESSUAGE is, properly, a dwelling-
house with some adjacent land assigned
to the use thereof. Plowd. 169, 170.
Co. Litt. 5 a. Whart. Law Dict. 487.
MISDEMEANOR. This word, in
the laws of England, signifies a crime.
Every crime is a misdemeanor, yet the
law hath made a distinction between
crimes of a higher and a lower nature;
the latter heing denominated misdemean-
ors, the former, felonies, &c. A crime,
or misdemeanor, is, therefore, an act
committed, or omitted, in violation of a
public law, either forbidding or com-
manding it. This general definition com-
prehends both crimes and misdemeanors,
which, properly speaking, are mere syn-
onymous terms, though, in common
usage, the word ‘‘crimes” is made to
denote such offences as are of a deeper
and more atrocious dye; while smaller
faults and omissions, of less consequence,
are comprised under the gentle name of
misdemeanors. 4 Bl. Com. 3, 5. Whart.
Law Dict. 491. !
MISNOMER is the using one name
for another—a misnaming. 11 Co. 20,
21. Ld. Raym. 304. Hob. 125. Whart.
Law Dict. 492.
MITTIMUS is a precept in writing,
under the hand and seal of a justice of
the peace, directed to the jailer, for the
receiving and safe-keeping of an offender,
until he is delivered by law. 2 Inst. 590.
Whart. Law Dict, 495.
MOLITER MANUS IMPOSUIT, se-
veral justifications in trespass, 7. e., actions
of assault, are called by this name, from
the words “gently laid his hands upon
him” used in the plea; as where the de-
fendant justifies an assault by showing’
that the plaintiff was unlawfully in the
bouse of the defendant, making a disturb-
ance, and being requested to cease such
disturbance, and depart, he refused, and
continued therein, making such disturb-
ance ; he, the defendant, “ gently laid his
hands” on the plaintiff and removed him
out of the house. So, in various other
instances, as for separating two persong
fighting, in order to preserve the peace;
78
so in the legal exercise of an office, &c.
3 Bl. Com. 121. Whart. Law Dict. 496.
MORTGAGE signifies a pawn of land
or tenement, or anything immovable,
laid or bound, for money borrowed, to
be the creditor’s for ever, if the money be
not paid at the day agreed upon; and the
creditor holding land and tenements upon
this bargain is called tenant in mortgage.
He who maketh a pledge or pawn of this
sort, is called the mortgagor, and he to
whom it is made, the mortgagee. Glan-
vil. Cowel. 2 Bl. Com. 156. Whart.
Law Dict. 501.
MOVABLES are all such things per-
sonal which may atvend a man’s person
wherever he goes; in contradistinction to
things ¢mmovable, as houses and lands.
2 Bl. Com. 384. Whart. Law Dict. 504.
NOLLE PROSEQUL is where a plain-
tiff, in any action, will proceed no further:
and may be before or after verdict;
though it is usually before ; and it is then
stronger against the plaintiff than a non-
suit, which is only a default in appearance ;
but this is a voluntary acknowledgment
that he hath no cause of action. 2 Lill.
218. 8 Co. 58. Whart. Law Dict. 519.
NOT GUILTY. is the general issue or
plea of the defendant in any action for a
tort, wrong or injury; such as trespass
and the like. Palm. 393. Whart. Law
Dict. 525.
NUDUM PACTUM is a bare, naked
contract, without any consideration had
for the same ; as where there is an agree-
ment to do or pay anything, on one side,
without any compensation on the other ;
this is a nudum pactum or nude contract,
void in law. Termes de la Ley 477. 2
Bl. Com. 445. Whart. Law Dict. 529.
NUISANCE signifies, generally, any-
thing that worketh hurt, inconvenience
or damage to the property or person of an-
other. And nuisances are of two kinds,
public or common nuisances, which affect
the public, and are an annoyance to ail
the king’s subjects [people of the com-
monwealth], and private nuisances which
may be defined to be ‘‘ anything done to
the hurt or annoyance of the lands,
tenements or hereditaments of another.”
3 Bl. Com. 216. Whart. Law Dict. 529.
OATEL is a solemn calling or appealing
to Almighty God, as a witness of the
truth of what we affirm or deny, in the
presence of those who are duly authorized
MAGISTRATE’S VOCABULARY.
to administer it to us; and it is called
corporal, because, in taking it, the party is
obliged to lay his hands on and kiss the
‘Holy Gospel. 3 Inst. 165. Whart. Law
Dict. 532.
OFFENCE, an act committed against
a law, or omitted where the law requires
it, and punishable by it. West Symb.
Offences are of two sorts, capital or not
capital ; capital offences are those for
which the offender shall lose his life, such
as high treason, petit treason and felony ;
offences not capital, include the remain-
ing part of‘criminal offences or pleas of
the crown, and come under the denomi-
nation of misdemeanors. 2 Hawk. P.O.
ce. 126, § 134. Whart. Law Dict. 533.
OFFICE signifies that function, by vir-
tue whereof a man hath some employment
in the affairs of another ; as of the king
[or the commonwealth], or of another
person. Cowel. Offices are a right to
exercise a public or private employment,
and to take the fees and emoluments there-
unto belonging. 2 Bl. Com. 36. Whart.
Law Dict. 537.
ONUS PROBANDI. The burden of
proving anything. Stat. 14 Car. IL., ¢.
11. Whart. Law Dict. 540.
OVERT MARKET. An open mar-
ket. 2 Bl. Com. 449. [There is no
overt market in Pennsylvania. 5 S. &
R. 130. 12 Penn. St. 230.]
O YES, corrupted from the French
oyez, HEAR YE, is an expression used
by the crier of a court, in order to enjoin
silence, when any proclamation is made.
4 Bl. Com. 340. Whart. Law Dict. 546.
PARENT. A father or mother; but
generally applied to the father. Wood’s
Inst. 63.
PARTIES are those who are named in
a deed, or fine, as parties to it: as those
who levy the fine, and to whom the fine
is levied ; so, they who make any deed,
and they to whom it is made, are called
pees to the deed. Cowel. Whart.
aw Dict. 561.
PAYMENT OF MONEY INTO
COURT is a species uf confession of the
right of action. It is, for the most part,
necessary upon pleading a tender, and is,
itself, a kind of tender to the plaintiff, by
paying into the hands of the proper officer
of the court as much as the defendant
acknowledges to be due, together with
the costs hitherto incurred, in order to
LAW TERMS AND PHRASES. 79
prevent the expense of any further pro-
ceedings. 3 Bl. Com.304. Whart. Law
Dict. 567.
PENALTY is a forfeiture inflicted for
not complying with the regulation of
certain acts of parliament [of the general
assembly]. A penalty is also annexed to
secure the performance of certain cove-
nants in a deed, articles of agreement, &c.
In a bond also for payment of money, it
1s usual to annex the penalty in double
the amount of the obligation. 3 Bl. Com.
434. Whart. Law Dict, 570.
PERSONS are divided by law into
either natural persons or aréificial. Nat-
ural persons are such as the God of
Nature formed us: artificial are such as
are created and devised by human laws,’
for the purposes of society and govern-
ment; which are called corporations, or
bodies politic. 1 Bl. Com. 122, 467.
Whart. Law Dict. 576.
POLICE is applied to the internal
regulations of large cities, particularly of
the metropolis. 4 Bl. Com. 162. Whart.
Law Dict. 590.
POSSE COMITATUS. For keeping
the peace, and pursuing felons, the sheriff
may command all the people of his county
to attend him; which is called posse
comitatus. 1 Bl. Com. 343. Whart. Law
Dict. 594.
POSSESSION is two-fold, actual, and
in law. Actual possession is when a man
actually enters into lands and tenements
to him descended. Possession in law is
when the lands or tenements are de-
scended to 2 man, and he has not as yét
actually entered into them. Staundf.
198. Whart. Law Dict. 595.
PRECEDENTS are authorities to fol-
low in determinations, in courts of jus-
tice. 400.93. Oro. Eliz. 65. 2 Lill.
Abr. 844. Whart. Law Dict. 602. There
are also precedents or forms for convey-
ances and pleadings in the courts of law,
which are in general use amongst prac-
titioners.
PREMISKHS, in a deed, are those parts
in the beginning thereof, wherein are set
forth the names of the parties, with their
titles and additions, and wherein are re-
cited such deeds, agreements or matters
of fact, as are necessary to explain the
reasons upon which the present transac-
tion is founded. And herein also is
set down the consideration upon which
the deed is made, and the certainty of the
thing granted. 2 Bl. Com. 298. Whart.
Law Dict. 603.
PRESENTMENT OF OFFENCES.
A presentment, generally taken, is a very
comprehensive term, including not only
presentment, properly so called, but also
inquisitions of office, and indictments by
a grand jury.
But a presentment, properly speaking,
is the notice taken by a grand jury, of
any offence, from their own knowledge or
observation (Lamb. Hirenarch. 1. 4, c. 5),
without any bill of indictment laid before
them at the suit of the king [the com-
monwealth]; as the presentment of a
nuisance, a libel, and the like; upon
which the officer of the court [the dis-
trict-attorney] must afterwards frame an
indictment before the party presented can
be put to answerit. 2 Inst.739. Whart.
Law Dict. 605.
PRISON. A place of confinement for
the safe custody of persons, in order to
their answering any action, or civil or
criminal prosecution; and upon conviction
of a criminal offence, a prison is, in innu-
merable instances, by statute, appointed
to be a place of punishment, as well as
safe custody. Termes de la Ley 460.
Whart. Law Dict. 609.
PROCESS, in czvil cnuses, is the means
of compelling a defendant to appear in
court. This is sometimes called original
process, being founded upon the original
writ, and also to distinguish it from mesne
or intermediate process, which issues
pending the suit, upon some collateral,
interlocutory matter; as to summon juries,
witnesses, and the like. Finch, L. 436.
Whart. Law Dict. 612.
PROMISSORY NOTES, or notes of
hand, are a plain and direct engagement,
in writing, to pay a sum specified at the
time therein limited, to a person therein
named, or sometimes to his order, or
often to the bearer at large. 2 Bl. Com.
467. Whart. Law Dict. 615.
QUANTUM MERUIT (that is, as
much as he has deserved), is an action
ou the case grounded upon the promise
of another, to pay him for doing anything
so much as. he should deserve or merit.
3 Bl. Com. 163. Whart. Law Dict. 675.
QUANTUM VALEBAT is where
goods and wares, sold or delivered by
tradesman, at no certain price, or to be
paid for them as much as they are worth,
80 MAGISTRATE’S
in general, then quantum valebat lies.
Ibid.
QUID PRO QUO signifieth some-
thing for somewhat ; and is used in the
law for the giving one thing of value for
another thing, being the mutual consider-
ation and performance of both parties to a
contract. Kitch, 184. Whart. Law Dict.
631.
RECEIPTS are acknowledgments in
writing of having received a sum of mo-
ney, or other value. A receipt is either
a voucher for an obligation discharged,
or one incurred. Whart. Law Dict. 640.
A RECOGNISANCK is an obligation
of record which a man enters into before
some court of record, or magistrate duly
authorized (Bac. Abr. 24), with condi-
tion to do some particular act; as to ap-
pear at the assizes [quarter sessions], to
keep the peace, to pay a debt, or the like.
Tt is, in most respects, like another bond,
the difference being chiefly this, that the
bond is the creation of a fresh debt, or
obligation de novo ; the recognisance is an
acknowledgment of a former debt upon
record; the form' whereof is, ‘‘that A.
B. doth acknowledge to owe to our lord
the king [the commonwealth], to the
plaintiff, to C. D., or the like, the sum of
ten pounds,” with condition to be void on
performance of the thing stipulated ; in
which case the king [the common-
wealth], the plaintiff, C. D., &c., is called
the cognisee, as he that enters into the
recognisance is called the cognisor. 2 Bl.
Com. 340. Whart. Law Dict. 641.
RECOGNISEE, He to whom one is
bound in a recognisance. Whart. Law
Dict. 641.
RECOGNISOR. He who enters into
the recognisance. Jacob. Whart. Law
Dict. 641.
RECORD is a memorial or remem-
brance, in rolls of parchment, of the
proceedings and acts of’ a court of justice,
which hath power to hold plea, according
to the course of the common law, of real
or mixed actions, or of actions quare vi et
armis, or of personal actions, whereof the
debt or damage amounts to 40s. [shil-
lings], or above: which are called courts
of record, and are created by act of par-
liament, letters patent, or prescription. 1
Inst. 260. In legal acceptation, however,
records are restrained to the rolls of such
courts only as are courts of record, and
not the rolls of inferior or other courts,
VOCABULARY.
which proceed, not according to the law
and custom of England. Ibid. There
are three kinds of records: viz. a judt-
cial record, as an attainder, &e.; a min-
isterial record, on oath, being an office or
inquisition found; and a record made by
conveyance and consent, as a fine, or a
deed enrolled. 4 Co. 54. 2 Lill. 421.
Whart. Law Dict. 641.
REPLEVIN. The action of replevin
is founded upon a distress taken wrovg-
fully, and without sufficient cause ; being
a re-delivery of the pledge, or thing taken
in distress, to the owner, upon his giving
security to try the right of the distress.
and to restore it, if the right be adjudged
against him; after which the distrainor
-may keep it till tender made of sufficient
amends; but must then re-deliver it to
the owner. Co. Litt. 145. 8 Co. 147.
3 Bl. Com. 147. Whart. Law Dict. 654.
REPORTS are a public relation of
cases, judicially adjudged, in courts of
justice, with the reasons, as delivered by
the judges. Co. Litt. 293. These reports
are histories of the several cases, with a
short summary of the proceedings, which
are preserved at large on the record; the
arguments on both sides, and the reasons
the court gave for its judgment, taken
down in short notes by persons present
at the determination. 1 Bl. Com. 71.
Whart. Law Dict. 656
RESCUE, or RESCOUS, is the tak-
ing away, and setting at liberty, against
law, any distress taken for rent, or ser-
vices, or damage feasant ; but it more
generally signifies the forcibly and know-
ingly freeing another from an arrest, im-
prisonment, or some legal commitment.
Co. Litt. 160. Whart. Law Dict. 657-8.
RETAINING FEE is a fee given to
any serjeant or barrister, to retain him;
that is, secure his services against the
contrary party. Termes de la Ley 350.
Whart, Law Dict. 663.
RIOT. A riot seems to be a tumult
uous disturbance of the peace by three
persons, or more, assembling together, of
their own authority, with an intent mu-
tually to assist one another against any
one who shall oppose them in the execu-
tion of some enterprise of a private na-
ture ; and afterwards, actually executing
the same in a violent, turbulent manner,
to the terror of the people, whether the
act intended was, of itself, lawful or un-
lawful. Hawk. P. ©. c. 65. 2 Clark
278. Whart. Law Dict. 669.
LAW TERMS AND PHRASES.
ROBBERY is a felony committed by
a violent assault upon the person of an-
other, by putting him in fear, and taking
from his person his money, or other goods
of any value whatever. 3 Inst. 68, c.
16. And this offence was called robbery,
either because they bereaved the true
man of some of his robes or garments ;
or because his money or goods were taken
out of some part of his garment or robe
about his person. 3 Inst. c. 16. Whart.
Law Dict. 670.
ROUT is where three or more persons
meet to do an unlawful act upon a com-
mon quarrel, as forcibly breaking down
fences, upon a right claimed of common,
or of way, and make some advances to-
wards it; and the difference between an
unlawful assembly, a rout, and a riot, is
this—an unlawful assembly is where
three or more do assemble themselves
together to do an unlawful act, as to pull
down inclosures, to destroy a warren and
the game therein, and depart without
doing tt, or making any motion towards
it. A rout is when, after their meeting,
they move forward toward the execution
of any such act, whether they put their
intended purpose in execution or not. A
riot is where they actually commit an
unlawful act of violence, either with or
without a common case of quarrel; as
if they beat a man, or kill game in an-
other man’s liberty, or do any other
unlawful act, with force and violence, or
even do a lawful act, as removing a nui-
sance, in a violent and tumultuous man-
ner. 4 Bl. Com. 140. Whart. Law
Dict. 671. - See Riot.
RULE OF COURT. An order made
either between parties to a suit on motion,
or to regulate the practice of the court.
Jacob.
SACRILEGEH is a church larceny, or
a taking of things out of a holy place;
as, where a person steals any vessels,
ornaments or goods of the church: and
it is said to be a robbery of God, at least
what is sacred to his service. Cro. Car.
153. Whart. Law Dict. 672.
SALE, or exchange, is a translation
of property from one man to another; in
consideration of some price or recom-
pense in value; for there is no sale with-
out a recompense ; there must be a guid
‘pro quo [something given for some other
thing]. Noy’s Max. 42.
SATISFACTION is the giving of
6
81
recompense for an injury done, or the
payment of money due on bond, judg-
ment, &. 2 Lill. Abr. 495. Whart. Law
Dict. 675.
SCHEDULE is a little roll, or long
piece of paper or parchment, in which
are contained particulars of goods in a
house let by lease. Morg. Whart. Law
Dict. 678. Schedules are likewise fre-
quently annexed to answers in a court of
equity, containing an account of estates,
or effects, moneys, debts, &c., received, or
disposed of, or expended by, the person
putting in the answer ; and schedule is a
term frequently used instead of inventory.
Jacob.
SCILICET, ss, an adverb, signifying
—that is to say—or to wit:—often used
in law proceedings. It is not a direct
and separate clause, but it is rather to
usher in the sentence of another. Hob.
171,172. Whart. Law Dict. 678.
SCRIVENER is a person who re-
ceives money to lay out upon security,
and to hold the money in his hands un-
til an opportunity offers of laying it out.
18 Eng. L. & Eq. 402.
SET-OFF is when the defendant ac-
knowledges the justice of the plaintiff’s
demand on the one hand, but, on the
other, sets up a demand of his own to
counterbalance that of the plaintiff, either
in the whole, or in part; as, if the plain-
tiff sues for £10 due on a note of hand,
the defendant may set off £9 due to him-
self for merchandise sold to the plaintiff.
3 BI. Com. 304. Whart. Law Dict. 690.
SIMPLE CONTRACT, debt by. Debts
by simple contract are such, where the
contract upon which the obligation arises
is neither ascertained by matter of record
nor yet by deed or special instrument,
but by mere oral evidence, the most sim-
ple of any, or by notes unsealed, which
are capable of a more easy proof, and
(therefore only) better than a verbal pro-
mise. 3 Bl. Com. 465. Whart. Law
Dict. 696.
SINGLE BOND, or deed, whereby
the obligor [he who gives the bond]
obliges himself, his heirs, executors and
administrators, to pay a certain sum
of money to another at a day appointed.
2 Bl. Com. 340. Whart. Law Dict. 697.
SLANDER is the defaming of a man
in his reputation, profession or livelihood,
as, if a man, maliciously and falsely utter
any slander or false tale of another, which
may either endanger him in law, by im-
82
peaching him of some heinous crime, as
to say that a man hath poisoned another,
or is perjured; or which may exclude
him from society, as to charge him with
an infectious disease; or which may im-
pair or hurt his trade or livelihood, as to
call a tradesman a bankrupt. 3 Bl. Com.
124. Whart. Law Dict. 699.
STOPPAGE [N TRANSITU. When
goods are consigned upon credit, by one
merchant to another, it frequently happens
that the consignee (he to whom the goods
are consigned) becomes a bankrupt or in-
solvent before the goods are delivered ; in
such case the law permits the consignor
(the person who sends the goods) to re-
sume the possession of his goods. This
right which the consignor has of resuming
the possession of his goods, if the full
price has not been paid, in the event of
the insolvency of the consignee, is techni-
cally termed the right of stopping in tran-
situ, that is in its transmission. Selw.
Nisi Prius 1106. Whart. Law Dict. 713.
SUBPGNA ADTESTIFICANDUM,
a writ of process to bring in witnesses to
give their testimony in any cause, not
only in chancery, but all other courts.
3 BI. Com. 369. Whart. Law Dict. 715.
SUBPGINA DUCES TECUM. This
is a writ or process of the same kind with
the preceding subpena, including a clause
of requisition for the witness to bring
and produce books and papers in his
hands, belonging to, or wherein, the par-
ties are interested, or tending to elucidate
the matter in question. 3 Bl. Com. 382.
Whart. Law Dict. 715.
SUMMARY CONVICTIONS are
such as are directed by act of parliament
[or act of assembly], for the conviction
of offenders, and the inflicting of certain
penalties created by. those acts of parlia-
ment [or acts of assembly]. In these
cases there is no intervention of a jury;
but the party accused is acquitted or con-
demned, by the suffrage of such person
only as the statute hath appointed for
his judge. 4 Bl. Com. 281-2.
SUPERSEDEAS, a writ that lies ina
great many cases; and signifies, in gen-
eral, 2 command to stay some ordinary
proceedings at law, on good cause shown,
which ought otherwise to proceed. F.N.
B. 236. Whart. Law Dict. 719.
SURETY is the bail or pledge for any
person, that he shall do or perform such
a thing; as surety for the peace is the
acknowledging a recognisance or bond to
MAGISTRATE’S VOCABULARY.
the king [the commonwealth], taken by
a competent judge of record for keeping
the king’s [the commonwealth’s] peace.
Dalt. ec. 116. Whart. Law Dict. 720.
SURETY OF THE GOOD BEHA.
VIOR includes the peace, and he that
is bound to good behavior, is therein also
bound to the peace. Ibid. c. 122. 4 Bl
Com. 255. Whart. Law Dict. 331,
SURETY OF THE PEACE; so
called, because the party that was in fear
is thereby secured, This security con-
sists in being bound with one or more
sureties, in a recognisanee or obligation,
to the king [the commonwealth], entered
on record and taken in some court, or by
some judicial officer, whereby the parties
acknowledge themselves to be indebted to
the crown [the commonwealth] in the
sum required (for instance, £100), with
condition to be void and of non-effect, if
the party shall appear in court, on such
a day, and, in the meantime, shall keep
the peace, either generally towards the
king [the commonwealth] and all his
liege people, and particularly also with
regard to the person who craves the secu-
rity; or if it be for the good behavior,
then on condition that he shall demean
and behave himself well (or be of good
behavior), either generally, or specially,
for the time therein limited as for one or
more years, or for life. 4 BI. Com. 252.
TARIFF, the customs, or the duties,
toll or tribute, payable upon merchandise
exported and imported, are so called.
1 Bl. Com. 313. Whart. Law Dict. 731
TENANT signifies one that holds or
possesses lands or tenements by any kind
of right, either in fee, for life, years, cr
at will. Kitch. fol. 160. Whart. Law
Dict. 733.
TENANTS IN COMMON are such
as hold lands for life or years, by several
titles, or by one title, and several rights
l Inst 188. 2 Lill. Abr. 559. Whart.
Law Dict. 732.
TENDER is an offer to pay a debt, or
perform a duty; or it is the offering
of money, or any other thing, in satisfac-
tion, or circumspectly to endeavor the
performance of a thing. Termes de la
Ley 522. Whart. Law Dict. 733.
TERMS OF THE LAW are technical
words, and terms of art particularly used
in, and adapted to, the profession of the
law. 2 Hawk. P. C. 239,
THINGS are, by the law of England,
LAW TERMS AND PHRASES.
distributed into two kinds—things real,
and things personal. Things real are
such as are permanent, fixed and im-
movable, which cannot be carried out
of their place, as lands and tenements.
Things personal are goods, money and
all other movables, which may attend the
owner’s person wherever he thinks proper
to go. 2 Bl. Com. 16. Whart. Law Dict.
744.
TRANSCRIPT is the copy of an
original writing or deed, where it is
written over again, or exemplified. Cowel.
Whart. Law Dict. 748.
TRESPASS is any transgression of the
law, under treason, felony or misprision
of either ; but it is most constantly used
for that wrong or damage which is done
by one private man to another, and it is
of two sorts: 1. Trespuss general, other-
wise called trespass vi et armis, and
2. Trespass special, or upon the case. Bro.
Trespass. Bract. lib. 4. Selw. N. P.
1152. Trespass,in its largest and most ex-
tensive sense, signifies any transgression or
offence agaiust the law of nature, ofsociety,
orof the country in which we live, whether
itrelatesto a man’s person or his property.
Therefore, beating another is trespass, for
which an action of trespass vi et armis,
in assault and battery, will lie; taking or
detaining a man’s goods, are, respect-
ively, trespasses, for which an action of
trespass vt et armis, or on the case, in
trover and conversion, is given by the
law; so also, non-performance of promises
or undertakings is a trespass upon which
an action of trespass on the case, in
assumpsit, is grounded ; and in general,
any misfeasance, or act of one man,
whereby another is injuriously treated, or
damnified, is a transgression or trespass,
in its largest sense. 3 BI. Com. 208-9. In
a limited and confined sense, it signifies
no more than an entry on another man’s
goods, without a lawful authority, and
doing some damage, however inconsider-
able, to his real property. 8 Bl. Com.
209. Whart. Law Dict. 751.
TRIAL is the examination of a cause,
civil or criminal, before a judge who
has jurisdiction of it, according to the
laws of the land ; it is the trial and exam-
ination of the point in issue, and of the
question between the parties, whereupon
the judgment may be given. 4 Inst. 124.
Finch 36. Whart Law Dict. 751.
TROVER is an action which a man
hath against one, that having found any
83
of his goods, refuseth to deliver them up
on demand: or, if another hath in his
possession my goods, by delivery to him,
or otherwise, and he sells or makes use
of them, without my consent, this is a
conversion for which ¢trover lies; so if
he doth not actually convert them, but
doth not deliver them to me on demand.
2 Lill. Abr. 618. Selw. N. P. 1190.
Whart. Law Dict. 752.
UNLAWFUL ASSEMBLY is where
three or more persons assemble together,
with intent, mutually, to assist each other
in the execution of some enterprise of a
private nature with force or violence.
J Hawk. P. C. 155. Whart. Law Dict.
757. See Riot.
USURY is the interest or profit ex-
acted for a loan beyond what is allowed
by statute. 4 Bl. Com. 453. Whart.
Law Dict. 763. :
VENDOR AND VENDEE. Vendor
is a person who sells anything, and ven-
dee the person to whom it is sold. 21
Vin. Abr. Whart. Law Dict. 767.
VERDICT is the answer of a jury
given to the court, concerning the matter
of fact, in any cause committed to their
trial, wherein every one of the twelve
jurors must agree, or it cannot be a ver-
dict. Co. Litt. 226. And a verdict is
twofold, general or special. A general
verdict is that which is given, or brought
into the court, in like general terms to the
general issue; as in an action of disseisin
the defendant pleadeth no wrong, no dis-
seisin, then the issue is general, whether
the fact be wrong or not, which being
committed to the jury, they, upon con-
sideration of the evidence, come in and
say, either for the plaintiff, that it is a
wrong and disseisin ; or, for the defend-
ant, that itis no wrong. A special verdict
is when they say, at large, that such a
thing, and such a thing, they find to be
done by the defendant or tenant, so de-
claring the cause of the fact, as in their
opinion it is proved; and, as to the law
upon the fact, they pray the judgment of
the court ; and this special verdict, if it
contain any ample declaration of the cause
from the beginning to the end, is also
called a verdict at large. Oo. Litt. 128.
Whart. Law Dict. 768.
VI ET ARMIS are words used in in-
dictments to express the charge of a
forcible and violent committing any crime
84
or trespass. 2 Hawk. P. 0.179. 1 Ibid.
150, 220. Whart. Law Dict. 770.
VIVA VOCKH is where a witness is
examined, personally, in open court,
Cowel. Whart. Law Dict. 772.
VOID and VOIDABLE. In the law
some things are absolutely void, and some
are voidable. A thing is void which is
done against law at the very time of the
doing of it, and it shall bind no person.
But a thing which is only voidable and
not void, will remain good until tt ts
avoided, 2 Lill. Abr. 653. Whart. Law
Dict. 772.
VOLUNTARY OATH is where a
man takes an oath in an extra-judicial
matter of which the law takes no notice.
4 Bl. Com. 1387. Whart. Law Dict. 773.
WARRANTY is a promise, or cove-
nant, by deed, made by the bargainor, for
himself and his heirs, to warrant or
secure the bargainee, and his heirs,
against all men, for the enjoying of the
thing granted. Bract. lib. 2,5. West
Symb. part 1. A warranty is either real
or personal. A real warranty is a cove-
nant real annexed to lands, whereby a
man and his heirs are bound to warrant
the same to some other and his heirs; and
that they shall quietly hold and enjoy the
lands, and upon voucher or by writ of
warrantia chart, to yield other lands
and tenements to the value of those that
shall be evicted by elder title. And
MAGISTRATE’S VOCABULARY.
warranty being « covenant real, bindeth
to yield lands in recompense. 1 Inst,
365, 384. Personal warranty is when
it concerns goods and chattels, and it is
created by implication ; for the purchaser
of goods may have a satisfaction from the
seller if he sells them as his own and the
title proves deficient, although there be
no express warranty to that purpose.
Cro. Jac. 474. Whart. Law Dict. 776.
WHITE-MEATS, are, milk, butter,
cheese, eggs, and any composition of
them, which formerly were forbidden in
Lent, as well as flesh, until Henry VIII.
published a proclamation allowing the
eating of white-meats iu Lent, Anno 1548.
Cowel. Blount. Whart. Law Dict.
780.
WILL, oR LAST WILL AND TESTaA-
MENT, is a solemn act or instrument,
whereby a person declares his mind and
intention, as to the disposal of his lands,
goods or effects, and what he would have
done after his death. Co. Litt. 111.
And the common law calls that a will
where dans or tenements are given; and
where it concerns goods and chattels
alone, it is termed a testament. Ibid.
Whart. Law Dict. 781.
WITNKSS is one that gives evidence
in a cause; an indifferent person to each
party, sworn to speak the truth, the whole
truth, and nothing but the truth. 2 Lill.
Abr 700. Whart. Law Dict. 787.
TECHNICAL LAW TERMS, EXPLAINED.
In the session of 1815-16, the Senate of Pennsylvania adopted the following
resolution—‘‘ Resolved, That the table explanatory of sundry technical law terms,
inserted immediately following the preface, in a treatise in possession of the Senate,
entitled— A collection of all the public and permanent acts of Assembly of Ken-
tucky, which are now iv force, &., &e., by Harry Goulmin, Secretary of the Com-
monwealth of Kentucky,’ be printed in an appendix to the journal of the Senate.”
From that “ explanatory table,” thus approved by our Senate, the following selec-
tions are made.
Action of detinue lies against one who
detains and refuses to deliver things
which were put into his hands to keep.
Action of trover und conversion (from
trouver, to find) lies against a person who
having found another’s goods refuses to
deliver them up on demand, but converts
them to his own use. The fact of finding
however, is immaterial; but the plaintiff,
for form sake, must say that he lost the
goods and that the defendant found them.
Action popular, an action given to the
people in general: as, where forfeitures
are given at large to any person who will
sue for the same.
Sometimes one part is given to the com-
monwealth or to some public use, and the
other part to the informer or prosecutor,
TECHNICAL LAW TERMS SXPLAINED.,
and then it is called a gui tam action, be-
cause it is brought by a person gui tam—
that is, who as well sues for the common-
wealth as for himself.
Ad quod damnum, is a writ directing
the sheriff to inquire what damages will
be sustained by certain acts.
‘Afidanit, an oath in writing, sworn
before a person who has authority to
take it.
Affirm, to ratify or confirm a former
judgment.
Alimony, is that allowance which a
married woman is entitled to upon any
occasional separation from her husband.
Alias, a second or another writ, which
issues after a first has been sued out
without effect. It is likewise used for
otherwise called, when a person goes by
more than one name.
Alibi, in another place.
Array, is the ranking or setting forth
of ajury. To challenge the array of the
panel is at once to except against all
the persons arrayed or impannelled, on
account of partiality, &c.
Arrest of judgment—to move in arrest
of judgment, is to show cause, why judg-
ment should be stayed notwithstanding a
verdict given.
Arson is a malicious and intentional
burning of another’s house,
Assault, a violent injury offered to a
man’s person, which may be committed
by offering a blow.
Assets (French assez, i. e. satis, enough)
signifies good enough to discharge that
burden which is cast upon the executor
or heir in satisfying the debts and lega-
cies of the testator or ancestor.
Assumpsit is taken for a voluntary pro-
mise, express or implied, by which a man
assumes or takes upon him to perform or
pay anything to another.
Attach is to take or apprehend in obe-
dience to a writ or precept.
Attachment is an apprehension of a
man by his body, or taking the possession
of his goods, to bring him to answer the
action of the plaintiff.
Attaint is a writ that lieth in certain
cases, after judgment against a jury that
hath given a false verdict.
Attainted is a word used particularly
for such as are found guilty of some
crime, and especially of treason or felony.
Anciently a person attainted of high
treason forfeited his lands, &c., his blood
was corrupted, and he and his posterity
rendered base.
85
Averment (from the French eet is
an offer of the defendant to make good or
justify an exception pleaded in abatement
or bar of the plaintiff's action, and it
signifies the act as well as the offer.
Bailiwick (a word taken from the
French, whose territory was divided into
bailiwicks as that of England is into
counties) is frequently used for county.
Baron hath various significations. It
is taken for a degree of nobility next to
viscount. In ancient records, it includes
all the nobility of Hngland. Formerly,
likewise, all men were styled barons,
Baron and Feme, husband and wife,
who in law are one person, so that neither
can be a witness for or against the other ;
except in cases of high treason [or per-
sonal injuries inflicted by the one upon
the other].
Bigamy is having more than one hus-
band or wife at the same time.
Curtesy—where a man marries a wo-
man seised of an estate of inheritance,
and has by her issue, born alive, which is
capable of inheriting her estate ; he shall,
on the death of his wife, hold the lands
for his life, as tenant by the curtesy.
Coverture is the state and condition of
a married woman.
Capias ad respondendum is a writ to
take the defendant and make him an-
swer.
Capias ad satisfaciendum (ca. sa.) is
a writ of execution, commanding the
sheriff to take the defendant’s body and
keep him till he make satisfaction for
the debt and damages.
Caveat (let him take care) is a kind of
process to stop the proving of a will, the
granting of the administration, or the
issuing of a patent for unappropriated
land, &c.
De bene esse—td take a thing de bene
esse, is to accept it as well done for the
present—but when it comes to be more
fully examined or tried, to stand or fall
according to the merit of the thing in its
own nature. As, when a complainant’s
witnesses are aged or sick, or going out
of the state, so that there is danger of
their testimony being lost, the court
of chancery will order them to be ex-
amined de bene esse, so as to be valid, if
they cannot be examined afterwards—
but if they live, or return after answer,
those depositions are not to be of force,
for the witness must be re-examined.
De novo—anew—over again.
Dedimus potestatum (we have given the
86
power) isa writ giving authority to ex-
amine witnesses, &c.
Extent signifies a writ or commission
to the sheriff, for the valuing of lands or
tenements.
Fee simple. A tenant-in fee simple, is
he that hath lands, tenements or heredit-
aments, to hold to him and his heirs for
ever, generally, absolutely and simply,
without mentioning what heirs, but refer-
ring that to his own pleasure or to the
disposition of the law.
Fee tail, or fee conditional, is a fee
restrained to some particular heirs to
the exclusion of others.
Feme covert, a married woman.
Feme sole, a single woman.
Fieri facias [ fi. fa.] (literally, that you
cause to be made) is a writ commanding
the sheriff to levy the debt and damages
recovered, out of the goods and chattels
of the defendant.
Garnishment (from garnier, to instruct
or inform) is a warning given to one for
his appearance.
Garnishee is a third person or party
in whose hands money is attached, and is
so called, because he hath had garnish-
ment or warning not to pay the money
to the defendant, but to appear and
answer to the plaintiff creditor’s suit.
Habeas corpus (i. e. that you have the
body), a writ so called from those words
being used in it—directing that the body
of him who is imprisoned be brought
before the court or a judge thereof, with
the cause of his detention.
Hereditaments signify all such immov-
able things as a man may have to him
and his heirs, by way of inheritance.
Homicide is the killing of a man.
Hue and cry, is a pursuit of one who
hath committed felony, from town to
town, till he is taken ; ‘which all persons
who are present where a felony is com-
mitted, or a dangerous wound given, are
bound to raise against the offenders.
Injunction is a prohibition granted in
divers cases to suspend further proceed-
ings.
Inquisition is a manner of proceeding
by way of search or examination.
Interlocutory order is that which de-
cides not the cause, but only some inci-
dental matter, which happens between
the beginning and end of it.
Joint-tenants are those that hold lands
or tenements jointly by one title.
Joinure is a settlement of lands and
tenements made toa woman in considera-
MAGISTRATE’S VOCABULARY.
tion of marriage, or a covenant whereby
the husband, or some friend of his, assur-
eth them to her for life.
Levant et couchant is a term used with
respect to cattle which have been so long
on the ground of another, that they have
lain down and risen again to feed.
Levuri facias isa writ for levying a
sum of money on 4 man’s lands and tene-
ments, goods and chattels, who has for-
feited his recognisance.
Mainpernors are those persons to whom
a man is delivered out of custody or
prison, or those becoming bound for his
appearing.
Mainprise is the taking of a person
into frieudly custody, who otherwise
might be committed to prison, upon secu-
rity being given that he shall be forth-
coming at the time and place appointed.
Mandamus (i. e. we command) is a
command issuing from a superior court
of judicature, requiring them to do some
particular thing therein specified, which
appertains to their office and duty.
Medietas lingue signifies a jury of
which one-half consists of foreigners.
[It is not allowed in Pennsylvania. ]
Mittimus (i. e. we have sent) is the
name of a precept from a justice to a
jailer on sending an offender to him
for safe-keeping, and likewise of a writ for
sending records from one court to another.
Mortgage is a pawn of lands or tene-
ments, &c., to be the creditor’s for ever,
if the money be not repaid on the day
agreed.
Mesne process is that which issues
whilst a suit is depending, upon some
interlocutory matter, as to summon juries,
witnesses, &c. It also signifies such pro-
cess as intervenes between the beginning
and end of a suit.
Ne exeat is a writ to restrain a person
from going out of the state.
Nihil dicit (i. e. he says nothing) is a
failing by the defendant to answer to the
plaintiff's plea by the day assigned.
Nil debet is a plea to au action of debt,
signifying he owes nothing.
Nolle prosequi siguifies that the plain-
tiff is unwilling to prosecute the suit.
Non assumpsit is a plea in personal
actions, denying that any promise was
made.
Non compos mentis is not being of a
sound mind, memory and understanding.
Non est culpabilis is a plea signifying
that he is not guilty—that the fact
charged is not true.
LAW PHRASES, &&, TRANSLATED.
Noun est factum is a plea in an action
on a bond or deed, that it was not exe-
cuted,
Non est tnventus is the return of a
sheriff on a writ, when the defendant
was not found in his county.
Nonsuit is the letting of a suit or
action fall.
Non sum informatus is the answer of
an attorney when he ts not informed or
instructed to say anything material in
defence of his client.
Nu! tiel record :—there is no such re-
cord,
Nuncupative will, a will by word of
mouth, before a sufficient number of wit-
nesses.
Onus probandi :—the burden of prov-
dng.
Oyer and terminer is a commission to
hear and determine all treasons, felonies,
&e. :
Posse comitatus, the power of the
county, including all above the age of
fifteen, who are able to travel.
Pluries, a writ issued in the third
place, after the two first have been diso-
beyed.
Posthumous is where a child is born
after the death of his father.
Procedendo is a writ sending a cause
back again to an inferior court.
Prochein ami :—the next friend.
Quantum meruit (i. e. how much he
hath deserved). It is an action of the
vase, grounded on the promise of another
to pay him for doing anything so much
as he should deserve.
Replevin is a remedy granted upon a
87
distress, being a re-deliverance of the
thing distrained to the first possessor,
on security or pledges, according to the
English law, being given by him to try
the right with the distrainor and to
answer him in a court of law.
Seisin signifies possession, and to seize
ig to take possession.
Subpena is a process to cause wit-
nesses to appear and give testimony,
under a penalty for disobedience.
Subpoena duces tecum is a process to
compel a witness to bring with him some
writing or other evidence, necessary to
be produced in the cause.
Supersedeas is a writ for staying pro-
ceedings at law, on good cause shown.
Scire facias is a writ commanding the
sheriff to cause it to Le made known to a
defendant against whom judgment has
been given, that he must appear on a
certain day, and show cause why execu-
tion ought not to issue. '
Testatum is a writ in personal actions,
after the sheriff has certified that the
defendant is not in the county, upon
which this writ is sent into some other
county where he is thought to be, or to
have wherewith to satisfy.
Test is a word used in the last part of
writs wherein the date is contained.
Venire is either a summons to cause
the party to come and answer an indict-
ment or presentment, or the process
directed to the sheriff to cause a jury to
appear.
Voir dire—to speak the truth—to
make true answer to such questions as
the court shall propose.
LAW PHRASES, ETC., TRANSLATED.
THE following translations have been selected from “ Jones’ translation of all the
Greek, Latin, Italian and French quotations which occur in Blackstone’s Commen-
taries on the Laws of England, and also in the notes of the editions by Christian,
Archbold and Williams :’’—they are, generally speaking, those which are in most
common use.
A fortiort, By a stronger reason.
Ab initio, From the beginning.
Ad valorem, According to the value.
A prior(, Beforehand.
A mensa et thoro, From bed and board.
A vineulo matrimonii, From the bond
of matrimony.
Assumpsit, He undertook.
Ad satisfaciendum, To satisfy.
Animo furandi, With a design of
1‘
stealing them.
Alias, As formerly.
Bond fide, Actual, real, in good faith.
Certiorart, To be certified of.
Curia advisare vult, The court will
consider it.
Casus omissus, Au omitted case.
Coram non judice, Before a judge nor
having jurisdiction.
‘ Cepi corpus, I have taken the body.
88
'
Capias, That you take.
Caveat, That he take care.
Contra bonos mores, Against good
morals.
De facto, In fact.
De novo, Anew. :
Dedimus potestatum, We have empow-
ered.
De bonis non, Of the goods not admin-
istered.
Dernier resort, The last resort.
Ex post facto, After the fact.
Ex officio, In the course of duty; by
virtue of his office.
Esto perpetua, Mayest thou endure for
ever.
E contra, On the other hand.
Enciente, Pregnant.
Ex contractt, Arising from a contract.
Ex delicto, Arising from offence or
misdeed.
Ex gratia, As matter of favor.
Exoneretur, Let him be exonerated.
Ex visitatione Dei, By the visitation
of God.
Fere nature, Of a wild nature.
Fieri facias (Fi. fa.], That you cause
to be made.
Fas et nefas, Lawful and unlawful.
Felo de se, A self-destroyer.
Flagrante delicto, In open crime.
Habeas corpus, That you have the
body.
In extremis, In his last moments.
Jpso facto, By the fact itself.
In loco parentis, In the place of a pa-
rent.
In infinitum, For ever.
Inquisitio post mortem, An inquisition
after death.
Indebitatus assumpsit, Being indebted,
he undertook.
In nubibus, In the clouds,
In pari passu, In an equal degree.
In foro legis, Tn a court of law.
In foro conscientiz, In the forum of
conscience.
In personam, In respect to the person.
In rem, In respect to the thing.
In toto, In the whole, entirely.
Later alia, Among other things.
Imperium in imperio, A government
within a government.
In futuro, At a future period.
Instanter, Instantly.
Jure divino, By divine right.
Leges non scripte, Unwritten laws.
Levari facias, That you cause to be
levied.
Malum in se, Crime in itself.
MAGISTRATE’S VOCABULARY.
Mala in se, Crimes in themselves.
Mandamus, We command.
Mutatis mutandis, The respective dif-
ferences being allowed for, or being altered
according to the circumstances of the case
Malum prohibitum, Fault, because for-
bidden.
Meum et tuum, Mine and thine.
Mittimus, We send or commit.
Nudum pactum, A barren compact.
Non compos mentis, Not in his right
mind.
Nam qui facit ‘per alium, facit per se,
For he who does a thing by the agency
of another, does it himself.
Nolle prosequi, Do not prosecute.
Nisi prius, Unless before.
Nil debet, He owes nothing.
Oyer and terminer, To hear and deter.
mine.
Pro and con, For and against.
Pro bono publico, For the public good.
Prima facie, On the first view.
Pro forma, For form’s sake.
Pro tanto, For so much.
Pro tempore, For a time.
Post vbit, After he dies.
Pendente lite, Pending a suit.
Petitio principiit, Begging the ques-
tion.
Puisne, Younger.
Proprié manu, With his own hand.
Pluries, As more than once.
Quo ad hoc, As to this.
Quo warranto, By what warrant.
Quantum valebat, As much as it is
worth,
Supersedeas, That you forbear, a com-
mand to stay or forbear doing that which
ought not to be done,
Se defendendo, In self-defence.
Sub modo, In a certain degree.
Scire facias, That you make known.
Subpena ad testificandum, A subpena
to give evidence.
Subpeena duces tecum, You shall bring
with you the papers mentioned in the
subpoena.
Teste, Witness.
Viva voce, By word of mouth.
Vi et armis, By force and arms.
Vice versa, By converse position.
Verbatim, Word for word.
Venditioni exponas, That you expose
for sale.
Venire facias, That you cause to come.
Vexata questio, A perplexed question.
Virtute oficti sui, By virtue of his office.
Vou popult, vow Dei, The voice of the
people is the voice of God.
THE
MAGISTRATE’S DAILY COMPANION
AND
BUSINESS MAN’S LEGAL GUIDE.
Abatement.
I. Definition of a plea in abatement. parties.
II. Abatement of the writ or return. VI. Pendency of former suit for the same
IIT. Pleas to the jurisdiction. cause.
IV. Disabilities of the parties. VII. Death of parties.
V. Misnomer, misjoinder and non-joinder of VIII. When pleas in abatement to be filed.
I. A PLEA IN ABATEMENT is one which shows some ground for abating the
plaintiff's action, and makes prayer to that effect.
II. There are some matters of abatement before a justice of the peace, which
are not properly the subjects of a plea, but are to be taken advantage of by a
defendant, on motion; thus, it is required that a summons in a civil action before
a justice (except in the case of a non-resident defendant) be made returnable on a
day certain, not more than eight nor less than five days after the date thereof;
now, if a summons be issued returnable on a day more than eight or less than five
days from its date, this is illegal; and the proper mode of taking advantage of it
is, not by a plea in abatement, but by moving the justice to quash the writ, as one
improvidently issued.
So, the law requires that the summons be served on the defendant, in the par-
ticular manner prescribed by the act of assembly, at least four days before the time
of hearing; if the summons be served less than four days from the time when it is
returnable, the course is, not to plead in abatement, nor to move to quash the writ,
but to set aside the service thereof: And the same relief may be had, if the return
show that the summons was not served in the mode prescribed by law. But this
does not extend further than to set aside the return; the writ remains good, and
the plaintiff may, at his election, either discontinue his suit, rule the constable to
make a good return, issue an alias writ, or sue the constable for a false or insuffi-
cient return.? An appearance before the justice, for the purpose of objecting to a
return of the writ, is not a waiver of the defect.$
In deciding upon such motions as these, if the facts be found to correspoud
with the statement made by the defendant, the objection should be sustained by
the justice, and the summons, or service thereof, should be quashed, as the nature
of the case may require. The rejection of such an application can only have the
effect of subjecting the parties to costs and trouble, without bringing to issue
the matter at variance between them. A writ of certiorari will remove the proceed-
ings before a higher tribunal, and if any such defect appcar, they will be there
reversed and set aside.
TTI. Among pleas in abatement, are usually classed those to the jurisdiction;
and such a plea should be carefully and deliberately considered by the justice ;
1 Steph. Plead. 47. Whart. Law Dict. 2. 2 4 Penn. St. 501. 8 (89). 1
90 ABATEMENT.
for where there is an entire want of jurisdiction of the subject-matter, it is never
too late to object to the jurisdiction.! If the justice have not jurisdiction, the
common pleas has none on appeal? And this defect may be taken advantage of,
even on a writ of error, in the supreme court. Want of jurisdiction may be shown
by parol.*
IV. Among the proper pleas in abatement, are those which go to the disability
of the parties to sue or be sued. Thus, it is a good plea in abatement, that the
plaintiff is a fictitious person ;® or, that he died before the commencement of the
suit.®
It could formerly be pleaded in abatement that the plaintiff was a married woman,
but the act 8 June 1893, 22 3, 4, enacted that:
“Hereafter a married woman may sue and be sued civilly in all respects and in any
form of action and with the same effect and results and consequences as an unmarried
person, but she may not sue her husband, except in a proceeding for divorce, or in a
proceeding to protect or recover her separate property whensoever he may have de-
serted or separated himself from her without sufficient cause, or may have neglected
or refused to support her, nor may he sue her, except in a proceeding for divorce, or
in a proceeding to protect or recover his separate property whensvever she may have
deserted him, or separated herself from him without sufficient cause, nor may she be
arrested or imprisoned for her torts.’’
“Tn any proceeding brought by either under the provisions of section three to pro-
tect or recover the separate property of either, both shail be fully competent witnesses,
except that neither may testify to confidential communications made by one or the
other, unless this privilege be waived upon the trial.’’?
The infancy of the plaintiff may also be pleaded in abatement; for an infant can
only sue by his next friend or guardian.®
V. The misnomer of’ the plaintiff or defendant is properly matter of abatement; as
is, also, the misjoinder or non-joinder of proper parties; but such a plea can now very
seldom be made available to a defendant; since it has been provided by the act 4
May 1852, that in ‘‘all actions pending, or hereafter to be brought, in the several
courts of this commonwealth, and in all cases of judgments entered by confession, the
said courts shall have power, in any stage of the proceedings, to permit amendments,
by changing or adding the name or names of any party, plaintiff or defendant, when-
ever it shall appear to them that a mistake or omission has been made in the name
or names of any such party.’’® And by act 12 April 1858, this is to be “ so construed.
as to authorize the said courts, where by reason of there being too many persons in-
cluded as plaintiffs or defendants, by mistake, as will prevent the cause from being
tried on the merits, to permit an amendment, by striking out from the suit such
persons as plaintiffs or defendants.’’ ”°
Under these acts, both the christian and surname of a party may be amended.”
And the christian name of a defendant, which was left blank in the original pro-
cess, may be inserted.” In cases originating before justices of the peace, the courts
have always exercised great liberality in adding names to the record, to obviate
technical objections to the form in which the suit was brought.’® The statutes are
confined, however, to cases of clear mistake, and will not be suffered to effect an
entire change of the real parties to the suit.* If two parties be sued as copartners,
and it appear that the contract was made with only one of the defendants, the
name of the other may be stricken out, under the act of 1858."% Whenever the
rights of a party are liable to be defeated by having joined too many plaintiffs
and defendants, such an amendment is proper, and the fact of a mistake will be
presumed.** The act 14 April 1851 requires all partnerships to be registered in
11 Ash. 168. 17T,R.151, ® Purd. 100.
2108. & R. 227. 10 Thid.
5 4 Binn, 219, 11:15 Penn. St. 21.
410 W. 123. 3 Y.279. 1 Pitts, 271. 12°14 Ibid. 129,
5 5 W. 423. 19 Johns. 308, See 60 Penn. 13 27 Ibid. 98,
St. 436. 14 6 Ibid, 379,
61W. & 8. 438. 18 15 Leg. Int, 382,
7 Purd. 1303. 16 37 Penn. St. 130.
8 3 Penn.St.264. 7 Phila. 618. See 1M. 87.
ABATEMENT. 91
the office of the prothonotary of the court of common pleas, and provides, that “in
default or neglect of such partnership so to do, they shall not be permitted, in any
suits or actions against them, in any court, or before any justice of the peace or
alderman in this commonwealth, to plead any misnomer, or the omission of the
name of any member of the partnership, or the inclusion of the names of persons
not members of said partnership.”?
VI. Another matter of abatement is the pendency of a former suit for the same
cause of action.* Thus, the pendency of a domestic attachment issued by the
same plaintiff against the same defendant, may be pleaded in abatement.* But
the pendency of a former suit in a foreign country cannot be pleaded in abate-
ment of a suit for the same cause here.t’ Nor can the pendency of a former suit
in another state of the Union.®
VII. The death of the parties to a personal action, is cause of abatement, at
common law; but our statute gives full power to executors or administrators, to
become parties, and to prosecute or defend actions pending at the time of the death
of their testator or intestate, ‘‘where the cause of action doth by law survive to
them,” and also to commence and prosecute all personal actions, except actions
of slander, for libels, and for wrongs to the person.®
Since the passage of this act, all personal actions survive, except actions for
slander, libel, or wrongs to the person;’ and therefore, the action of trover sur-
vives§ By act 15 April 1851, actions for injuries to the person by negligence
or default, shall not abate by reason of the death of the plaintiff;® nor, by act
12 April 1869, shall actions of trespass to real or personal property.”
The act of 5 May 1854 provides, that if the plaintiff shall die during the pen-
dency of the suit, and no letters of administration or testamentary shall be taken
out in this state, within one year after the suggestion of his death upon the record,
it shall not be the duty of the defendant to raise an administrator, but the suit shall
abate, and the prothonotary of the proper court shall make an entry accordingly ;
notice, however, is required to be given to the parties entitled to administration,
one month before such entry, of which affidavit must be made and filed.™
By act 22 March 1861, no action on any joint contract, note, debt or obligation
shall abate, by reason of the death of one or more of the joint obligors, contractors,
debtors or promisors, since the commencement of the suit; but the same shall be
proceeded in to judgment and execution against the estate of the decedent, as
though commenced against him alone.”
Actions by or against executors, administrators or trustees do not abate by
the death, dismissal, resignation or renunciation of one or more of them, pending the
suit; but the survivors may prosecute the action, or their successors may be substi-
tuted for that purpose.* An administrator sued as executor may plead the intestacy
and granting letters of administration, in abatement."
VIII. Pleas in abatement cannot be put in after pleas in bar, unless under special
circumstances, of which the court must judge.® And a defendant cannot plead in
abatement, on an appeal, having neglected to do so before the justice.® The defend-
ant before a justice should put in his plea in abatement as soon as the plaintiff has
stated his cause of action, and should not suffer a continuance to intervene.
1 Purd. 1646. See 3 Phila. 148; 1 W. N.C. 5. 9 Purd. 55.
23 R. 320. 0 Tbid.
S1P. & W. 442. 1 Thid.
42 W. & 8.133,190, And see 8 W. N.C. 128. 1 Ibid.
5 44 Penn. St. 326. 45 Ibid. 488. 8 W.N.C. 38 Ibid. 54.
126. 14 8 Johns. 126.
§ Purd. 594, 1525S. & R. 537. 5 W. 373. 56 Penn. St. 110,
7 24 Penn. St. 122. 45 Ibid. 161.
8 4 Phila. 87. 16 4 W, 433.
[ 92 ]
Abduction.
Aot 31 Maron 1860. Purd. 1014.
Szor. 94, If any person shall, maliciously, either by force or fraud, lead, take or
carry away, or decoy or entice away, any child, under the age of ten years, with
the intent to deprive its parent or parents, or any other person having the lawful
charge or care of such child, of the possession of such child, by concealing and
detaining such child from such parent or parents, or other person or persons having
the lawful charge or care of it, or with intent to steal any article of apparel or
ornament, or other thing of value or use, upon or about the person of such child,
to whomsoever such article may belong, or shall receive and harbor, with any such
intent as aforesaid, any such child, knowing the same to have been so, by force or
fraud, led, taken or carried, or decoyed or enticed away as aforesaid, every such per-
son shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and, upon conviction thereof, be sentenced to
pay a fine not exceeding two thousand dollars, and to undergo an imprisonment,
by separate or solitary confinement at labor, not exceeding seven years: Provided
always, That no person who shall have claimed to be the father of any illegitimate
child, or to have any legal right to the possession of such child, shall be liable to
be prosecuted by virtue hereof, on account of getting possession of such child, out
of the possession of the mother or other person having lawful charge thereof.
Act 23 Fepruary 1875. Purd. 1015.
Sor. 1. If any person shall, maliciously, either by force or fraud, lead, take or
carry away, or decoy or entice away, any child, under the age of ten years, from
its parent or parents, or any other person having the lawful charge or care of such
child, or the possession of such child, with the intent to extort money, or any val-
uable thing, from the parent or any other person, for the restoration of such child,
every such person shall be guilty of a felony; and upon conviction thereof shall
be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding ten thousand dollars, and to undergo an
imprisonment by separate and solitary confinement at labor, fora period not exceed-
ing twenty-five years. And if any person within this commonwealth shall know-
ingly conceal, harbor or detain, or assist in concealing, harboring or detaining, any
such child, so taken, carried or enticed away as aforesaid, either within or without
this commonwealth, every such person shall be guilty of a felony ; and upon con-
viction thereof be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding five thousand dollars, and
to undergo an imprisonment by separate or solitary confinement at labor not
exceeding fifteen years: Provided, That this act shall not apply to the detaining or
concealing of any child taken or carried away before the passage of this act, where
he person or persons so harboring or concealing shall, within thirty days after the
passage of this act, surrender up such child to the custody of the nearest magis-
trate or justice of the peace, or to the sheriff of any county within this common-
wealth.
The offences prescribed by the act of 1860 may be committed, not only bya
defendant having a child in actual custody, knowing it to have been kidnapped,
but by any act which would show a malicious hiding of the child, as by any mali-
cious and intentional proceeding, or means used to prevent the parent, or those
searching for the child, from finding him, or by any malicious intentional misleading
or false directing of those searching for the child, or by a malicious and fraudulent
protecting of his place of concealment from search, and those having him in cus-
tody. Counts for kidnapping may be joined with others charging a harboring and
concealing with a guilty knowledge.2 This was the celebrated Charlie Ross case
The defendant was convicted, and served out his sentence in the penitentiary,
without opening his mouth ; and the parents never recovered their child.
1 See 50 L. T. 759. 211 Phila. 461,
[ 93}
Abortion,
I. Definition of abortion. III. Judicial decisions.
II. Provisions of the Penal Code.
I. Ir a woman be quick with child, and by a potion, or otherwise, killeth it, in
her womb, or if any one beat her, whereby the child dieth in her body, and she is
delivered of a dead child, this, though not murder, was, by the ancient law, homi-
cide or manslaughter. But the modern law doth not look upon this offence in quite
so atrocious a light, but merely as a heinous misdemeanor. But if the child be
born alive, and afterwards die in consequence of the potion or beating, it will
be murder! In Pennsylvania, the punishment of this offence is now provided for
by the revised Penal Code.
II. Act 31 Maron 1860. Purd. 472,
Seor. 87. If any person shall unlawfully administer to any woman, pregnant or
quick with child, or supposed and believed to be pregnant or quick with child, any
drug, poison or other substance whatsoever, or shall unlawfully use any instrument
or other means whatsoever, with the intent to procure the miscarriage of such
woman, and such woman, or any child with which she may be quick, shall die in
consequence of either of said unlawful acts, the person so offending shall be guilty
of felony, and shall be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars,
and to undergo an imprisonment, by separate or solitary confinement at labor, not
exceeding seven years. :
Scr. 88. If any person, with intent to procure the miscarriage of any woman,
shall unlawfully administer to her any poison, drug, or substance whatsoever,
or shall unlawfully use any instrument, or other means whatsoever, with the like
intent, such person shall be guilty of felony, and being thereof convicted, shall be
sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars, and undergo an imprison-
ment, by separate or solitary confinement at labor, not exceeding three years.
III. In an indictment for administering medicine to procure abortion, the name
of the medicine need not be stated, nor need the medicine be described as noxious.?
It is not necessary, it seems, in an indictment for the production of an abortion,
to aver quickness on the part of the mother; it is sufficient to set forth that she
was “big and pregnant.’’
Where a blow is maliciously given to a child whilst in the act of being born, as
for instance, upon the head, as soon as it appears, and before the child has breathed,
it will be murder, if the child is afterwards born alive, and dies thereof. If the
child has been wholly produced from the body of its mother alive, and she wilfully
strangle it while it is alive, and has an independent circulation of its own, this is
murder, although the child be still attached to its mother by the umbilical cord.
But it must be proved that the entire child has actually been born into the world
in a living state ; and the fact of its having breathed is not a conclusive proof
thereof‘ It is an indictable offence, to procure a pregnant woman to engage in
excessive and immoderate exercise, in order to bring about a miscarriage.®
Under an indictment for procuring an abortion of a quick child, which isa felony
by statute, in New York, the prisoner may be convicted of a misdemeanor, if the
child were not quick.® ;
Where death results from an abortion, the dying declarations of the woman are
not evidence against a prisoner charged with the offence.’ The offence described
in the 87th section does not amount to murder, either in the first or second degree®
113Bl. Com. 129. 4Gilm.111. 1 Bouv.Inst. +4 Whart. Cr. L. 3 942.
86. See Whart. Law Dict. 8. 5 3 Pitts. 462,
27 Blackf. 592. And see 1 Keyes 341. 6 3 Hill 92.
8 3 Clark 487. 13 Penn, St.631. Bright.441. 7 16 W.N. 0. 453.
Whart. Pr. 108. Whart. Cr. L. 3 1220. 8 17 Ibid. 492.
er
Academic Deqrees.
Act 19 May 1871. Purd. 473.
Sect. 1. It shall not be lawful for any university, college or other institution incor-
porated under the laws of this state, with power to grant academic degrees, honorary
or otherwise, to confer the same upon any person or persons upon the payment, or
promise of payment, by any person, in consideration thereof; and any person know-
ingly signing a diploma, or other instrument of writing purporting to confer an
academic degree, when such consideration has been paid, or promised to be paid,
shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and on conviction thereof, be sentenced to pay a
fine not exceeding five hundred dollars, and to undergo an imprisonment, not exceed-
ing six months, or both, or either, at the discretion of the court.
1 See 86 Penn. St. 353.
[95 J
Accessory.
IIL. Authorities in relation to accessories.
IV. Forms.
I. Who are deemed accessories,
II. Provisions of the Penal Code.
_ 1. AN accessory is he who is not the chief actor in the offence, nor present at
its performance, but in some way concerned therein, either before or after the fact
committed. An accessory before the fact is one who, being absent at the time
of the crime committed, doth yet procure, counsel or command another to commit a
crime. Herein absence is necessary to make him an accessory, for if such procurer,
or the like, be present, he is guilty of the crime as principal. An accessory after
the fact may be, where a person, knowing a felony to have been committed, receives
relieves, comforts or assists the felon: to hinder his being apprehended, tried or
suffering punishment, makes the assistant an accessory. :
II. Act 3 June 1893. Purd. 562.
Every principal in the second degree, or accessory before the fact, to any felony
punishable under any act of assembly of this commonwealth for whom no punishment
is provided, shall be punishable in the same manner as the principal in the first degree
is by such act punishable ; every accessory after the fact to any felony punishable under
any act of assembly of this commonwealth for whom no punishment is provided, shall,
on conviction, be sentenced to pay a fine, not exceeding five hundred dollars, and to
undergo an imprisonment, with or without labor, at the discretion of the court, not
exceeding two years, and every person who shall counsel, aid or abet the commission
of any misdemeanor punishable under any act of assembly of this commonwealth, for
whom no punishment is provided, shall be liable to be proceeded against and pun-
ished as the principal offender.
This section was introduced by the revisers of the Penal Code to simplify the
complications now existing in our criminal legislation, in reference to the punish-
ment of accessories. As the guilt of principal offenders in the second degree, and
accessories before the fact, is morally the same with that of the principal offender,
their punishment has been made the same; a general provision has also been made
in this section to embrace the cases of accessories after the fact, in felonies, and
power is given to the courts to inflict, within certain limits, upon such offenders, a
punishment proportionate to their crime, except in the cases of such accessories as
are otherwise provided for in the code. Accessories before the fact to misdemeanors,
are now punishable in the same manner, at the common law, as the principal, there
being, in fact, no such crime known to the common law as an accessory before the
fact toa misdemeanor, all such accessories being deemed principals; the last clause
of the section is framed with a view to this principle.’
Aot 31 Marcy 1860. Purd. 557.
Scr. 44. If any person shall become an accessory before the fact, to any felony,
whether the same be a felony at common law, or by virtue of an act of assembly
now in force or hereafter to be in force, such person may be indicted, tried, con-
victed and punished in all respects as if he were a principal felon.®
There is, therefore,
11 Hale H. P. C. 616, 618. 2 Hawk. P. C. 29,
32, See Whart. Law Dict. 11.
2 Report on the Penal Code 37.
3 The principle of this section, which prescribes
the same punishment against accessories before
the fact in felony, under the various synonymes
of aiders, abettors, counsellors, comforters, &c.,
as against principals, is familiar to our criminal
legislation; it is found in the 7th section of the
act of 1718, 1 Sm. 113; in the 2d section of
the act“of Sth March 1780, 1 Sm. 499; in the 2d,
3d and 5th sections of the act of 5th April 1790,
2 Sm. 531; and in the 4th section of the act of
23d April 1829, 10 Sm. 431.
nothing new in the principle of this section which
is founded on the theory of the moral guilt of the
accessory before the fact being equal to that of
the principal offender. The new principle in the
section is that which makes the accessory before
the fact guilty of a substantive offence, and which
subjects himto punishment for his crime, without
postponing it until the conviction of the actual
perpetrator; or more precisely speaking, which
abolishes in felonies the technical distinction now
existing between accessories before the fact and
principal offenders. This was always the law as
96
ACCESSORY.
Ssor. 45. If any person shall become an accessory after the fact to any felony,
whether the same be a felony at common law, or by virtue of any act of assembly
now in force, or that may be hereafter in force, he may be indicted and convicted
as an accessory after the fact, to the principal felony, together with the principal
felon, or after the conviction of the principal felon, or may be indicted and con-
victed of a substantive felony, whether the principal felon shall or shall not have
been previously convicted, or shall or shall not be amenable to justice, and may
thereupon be punished in like manner as any accessory after the fact to the same
felony, if convicted as an accessory, may be punished; and the offence of such
person, howsvever indicted, may be inquired of, tried, determined and punished, by
any court which shall have jurisdiction to try the principal felon, in the same
manner as if the aet by reason of which such person shall have become accessory,
had been committed at the same place as the principal felony: Provided always,
That no person who shall be once duly tried for any such offence, whether as an
accessory after the fact, or as for a substantive felony, shall be liable to be again
indicted or tried for the same offence.!
regards misdemeanors in which there are no
accessories, all being regarded by law as prin-
cipals ; in felony, however, except in certain cases
about to be noticed, an accessory cannot be tried
before the conviction or outlawry of his principal,
unless tried with him. In felonies of frequent
occurrence, this was found a great and serious
evil. which called for and received partial legis-
lative correction; as early as the act of the 31st
May 1718, 1 Sm. 105, it was provided that per-
sons harboring, concealing or receiving robbers,
burglars, felons or thieves, or receiving or buying
any goods or chattels that should have been felon-
iously taken or stolen by any such robbers, &c.,
knowing the same to be stolen, might be pro-
ceeded against as is therein directed ; and that if
any such principal felon could not be taken, so as
to be prosecuted and convicted for such offence,
that nevertheless it should be lawful to prosecute
and punish every such person buying or receiving
any goods stolen by such principal felon, knowing
the same to be stolen, although the principal felon
should not be convicted of the felony. This,
however, embraced only one class of accessories,
to wit, receivers of stolen goods, in cases where
the principal was not amenable to justice; after-
wards, by the act of 23d September 1791, 3 Sm.
41, it was provided “in all cases of felonies of
death, robbery and burglary, it shall be Jawful to
punish receivers of such felons, robbers and bur-
glars, by a fine and imprisonment, although the
principal felons, robbers and burglars cannot be
taken, so as to be prosecuted and tried for said
offences; which conviction and sentence of
said receivers shall exempt them from being
prosecuted as accessories after the fact, in case the
| ee felon, robber or burglar shall afterwards
e taken and convicted.” This act extended only
to accessories after the fact, in cases in which the
principals could not be taken.
The act of 11th April 1825, 8 Sm. 438, was
passed to avoid a difficulty which afterwards arose
in the prosceutions of receivers of stolen goods,
in cases in which the principals were amenable
to justice. The act of 1718 was taken from the
4th section of 4th & 5th Anne, ec. 31, which only
authorized preceedings against such receivers
before the conviction or attainder of their prin-
cipals, when such principals could not be taken.
Forster, in his discourse on accomplices, 3 6, p-
373, says, on this print: “ I know attempts have
been made, under various shapes, to prosecute the
receiver as for a misdemeanor, while the principal
hath been in custody and amenable, but not con-
victed; but I think such devices illegal.” The
act of 1825 solved the difficulty, by declaring that
receivers of property, knowing it to have been
feloniously stolen, may be prosecuted, although
the principal be not before convicted, and whether
he is amenable to justice or not.
It will thus be seen, that all our legislation
with regard to the trial of accessories to felonies,
before the conviction of their principals, applies
only to accessories after the fact, a class of of-
fenders who have had no primary connection with
the original crime, and whose guilt only consists
in having given comfort and succor to the actual
offender, after its perpetration; except in cases
of receivers of stolen goods, this offence is often
almost venial, consisting frequently in parents
and friends, influenced by the ties of blood, or
the impulses of affection, giving aid and comfort
to an offender whose crime they abominate and
deplore. It seems strange, that the common-law
privilege, which exempted accessories from liabil-
ity to justice, until the conviction or attainder of
the principal, should be taken away in cases
of accessories after the fact, and left in those of
accessories before the fact, whose guilt is always ag
great, and often much greater, than that of the
principal. The 45th section proposes putting our
statute laws on the subject of accessories to felo-
nies in harmony with justice and reason. Report
on the Penal Code 46-8. See 84 Penn. St. 187.
94 Ibid. 290. 11 Phila. 430. 10 L. Bar 107.
1 This section is only an extension of the exist-
ing laws, which, as will be seen from the pre-
ceding remarks, subjected accessories after the
fact, and receivers, to punishment, before the con-
viction or attainder of their principals. It em-
braces such accessories not only in common-law
felonies, but those created, or which hereafter may
be created, by statute; it authorizes the convic-
tion of such offenders, either with or after the
conviction of the principals, or for a substantive
offence, whether the principal felon shall or shall
not have been previously convicted, or shall or
shall not be amenable to justice. It also provides
for the caso of a party becoming an accessory
after tho fact in one county toa felony committed
in another ; giving jurisdiction over the crime of
such accessory to the courts of the county having
jurisdiction over the crime of the principal of-
fender. This provision supplies the 22d and 23d
sections of the act of 1718, 1 Sm. 119, made, pro-
babiy, to meet a doubt at common law, whether
an accessory in one county to a felony in another,
was indictable in either. Report on the Penal
Code 48.
ACCESSORY. 97
III. If several persons set out together, or in small parties, upon one common
design, be it murder, or other felony, or for any other purpose, unlawful in itself,
and each taketh the part assigned to him, some to commit the fact, others to watch,
at proper distances and stations, to prevent a surprise, or to favor, if need be, the
escape of those who are more immediately engaged, they are all, provided the fact
be committed, in the eye of the law, present at it! In some cases, even a person
absent may be a principal, as he that puts poison into anything to poison another,
and leaves it, though not present when it is taken; and so, it seems, all that are
present, when the poison is so infused, and consenting thereto?
If an act of parliament (or act of assembly) enact an offence to be felony, though
it mention nothing of accessories before, or after, yet virtually and consequentially
those that counsel or command the offence are accessories before, and those that
knowingly received the offender are accessories after® But if the act of parlia-
ment (or of assembly) that makes the felony, in express terms comprehend acces-
sories before, and makes no mention of accessories after [the fact], namely, receivers
or comforters, then, it seems, there can be no accessories after.*
It seems agreed, that the law hath such a regard to that duty, love and tender-
ness which a wife owes to her husband, as not to make her an accessory to felony
by any receipt given to her husband; yet if she be any way guilty of procuring
her husband to commit it, it seems to make her an accessory before the fact, in the
same manner as if she had been sole (single). Also, it seems agreed, that no other
relation besides that of a wife to her husband will exempt the receiver of a felon
from being an accessory to the felony ; from whence it follows, that if a master
receives a servant, or a servant a master, or a brother a brother, or even a husband
a wife, they are all accessories in the same manner as if they had been mere stran-
gers to one another®
If the wife, alone, the husband being ignorant of it, do receive any other
person, being a felon, the wite is accessory, and not the husband. But if the hus-
band and wife, both, receive a felon, knowingly, it shall be adjudged only the act
of the husband, and the wife shall be acquitted® A person may be indicted as
accessory to an unknown principal.” :
By the revised Penal Code, persons charged as accessories to murder, manslaughter
or other homicide are directed to be tried at a court of oyer and terminer.2 An
accessory may be tried before the conviction of the principal, but the guilt of the
latter must be proved.
IV. WARRANT FOR MISPRISION OF FELONY.
BERKS COUNTY, ss.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To the Constable of H——, in the County of Berks, greeting:
Wuergas, complaint hath been made before J. R., one of the Justices of the Peace in
and for the County of Berks, on oath of J. L., of H aforesaid, storekeeper, that R.S.,
of H——, aforesaid, blacksmith, well knowing that a felony and burglary had been com-
mitted by A. B., of H—, aforesaid, laborer, in the night of Sunday, the nineteenth day
of December, instant, in the dwelling-house of the said J. L., at H—— aforesaid, did
unlawfully conceal his knowledge of the same felony and burglary. These are, there-
fore, to command you forthwith to take the said R. §., and bring him before the said J. R.,
to answer unto the said complaint, and further to be dealt with according to law.
Wirness the said J. R., at H. aforesaid, the twenty-eighth day of December, in
the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and seventy-nine.
J. R., Justice of the Peace. [smax.]
Return of Constable on the Warrant.
I have taken the within-named R. S., whose body I have ready, as within I am com-
manded. December 30th, 1879. X. Y., Constable.
bid. 614.
1 Forst. Cr. L. 350. 2 Clark 367. T
2 Hawk. P. C. 320.
1
3
21 Hale H. P.C.216. A felony may be com-
mitted through the instrumentality of an innocent
agent; but if the agent be guilty, the absent em-
tes is only an accessory. 4 Park. 234. 5 Ibid.
19. 23 How. Pr. 93. 57 Ibid. 342.
§ 1 Hale H. P. ©. 613.
7
Hale H. P. C. 621.
Brewst. 422.
Purd. 1770.
107 Penn. St. 486.
Seewoaone
98 ACCESSORY.
WARRANT FOR AN ACCESSORY BEFORE THE FACT.
MERCER COUNTY, ss.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To the Constable of the Township of S——, in the County of Mercer, greeting:
Wuerzas, information hath been made on oath before J. R., one of the Justices of the
Peace in and for the County of Mercer, that one C. D., of the township aforesaid, laborer,
on the night of Tuesday, the seventh day of May, last past, did feloniously break and
enter the dwelling-house of E. F., at L. P., in the said county; and that A. B. of the
township aforesaid, yeoman, did procure, aid and abet the said C. D. to commit the said
felony and burglary. You are, therefore, hereby commanded forthwith to take the
said A. B. and bring him before the said J. R., to answer unto the said complaint, and
further to be dealt with according to law.
Witness the said J. R., at H——, in the said county, the fourth day of June, in the
year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and seventy-nine.
J. R., Justice of the Peace. [szat.]
Return of Constable.
By virtue of this warrant, to me directed, on the fifth day of June, instant, I took and
arrested the within named A. B., and safely kept him in my custody, until C. S., of
S—— township, aforesaid, and divers other persons to me unknown, on the sixth day
of June, instant, at the township aforesaid, assaulted and ill-treated me, and the said
A. B., out of my custody, then and there, rescued. And afterwards, the said A. B. is
not found in my bailiwick. June 10th, 1879. X. Y., Constable.
CoMMITMENT FOR AN ACCESSORY AFTER THE FACT.
DAUPHIN COUNTY, ss.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To any Constable of the said county, and to the Keeper of the Dauphin county prison,
eeting :
Oimuee are to authorize and require you, the said constable, forthwith to convey and
deliver into the custody of the keeper of the said prison, the body of J. L., of H in
the said county, coppersmith, charged, on the affirmation of J. W., of H—— aforesaid,
farmer, before J. R., one of the Justices of the Peace in and for the said county, with
having received, comforted, assisted and relieved a certain R. S., well knowing that a
felony and robbery had been committed by the said R. 8. upon T. B., of Berks county,
yeoman, on the sixth day of March, last past, by assaulting him upon the public high-
way, leading from L—— to H , and feloniously taking from him the sum of forty-five
dollars. And you the said keeper are hereby required and commanded to receive the
said J. L. into your custody, in the said prison, and him there safely keep, until he be
thence delivered by due course of law.
Witness the said J. R., of H. aforesaid, the tenth day of April, in the year of
our Lord one thousand eight hundred and seventy-nine.
J. R., Justice of the Peace. [szat.]
When the person charged is brought before the justice and the witnesses
examined, if the offence be bailable, he ought to be required to give sufficient
surety for his appearance at the succeeding court ; if the offence be not bailable,
or if the offender refuse or neglect to give such surety, he ought to be committed.
ForMs OF DOCKET-ENTRIES IN CRIMINAL CASES.
THE CoMMoNWEALTH Warrant issued May 24, 1893, to the constable of S—— town-
ia ship, on the atlirmation of D. W., charging defendant with re-
LL. ceiving, &c., R. §., who had committed a robbery upon 8. B.
April 4th, 1879, defendant brought, denies the charge, and ten-
ders bail, which is accepted. :
costs. J. L. bound ia $100 i the appearance of J. L. at the next
ca Justis i G. D. “ $100 f sessions, &c., to answer, &c., and not to
Docket-ontry é ‘ ‘i ji 25 depart, &e.
Warrant 7 + + s+ 88 Acknowledged May 25, 1893, before me, J.R.
EAIEABGO” la sh D. W. bound in $50 for his appearance at next sessions, &c.,
sees 109 | t© testify, &c , and not to depart, &c.
Mileage. . + ° + . 80] Acknowledged May 25, 1893, before me, J.R.
| (Returned to June sessions, 1893. )
ACTIONS AT LAW. 99
Tor CoMMONWEALTH Warrant issued May 24, 1893, to the Constable of H—,
aig: on oath of J. L., charging defendant with concealing 8. R.,
RS who had committed a burglary in the dwelling-house of the
pas said J. L., May 20,1893. Defendant brought and denies the
: charge. On hearing, he is directed to enter bail for his ap-
DeeheN een dO teT serrca | Pearance, &c, which he refuses. Commitment issued.
by constable. ; J. L. bound in $50 in their appearance respectively at next ses-
J.F. “$50 } sions, &c., to give evidence, &c., and not to
COosTs. J.D. «& $50 J depart, &e.
Justices © ses BRS Acknowledged May 24, 1893, before me,
Donstabloe Seat Oy J. B., Justice.
J. L. and J. F. sworn, J. D. affirmed.
(Returned to June sessions, 1893.)
Actions at Law,
Or Proceedings before Justices of the Peace in Civil Cases.
I. General nature of actions at law. 8. Trials by jury.
IL. Civil jurisdiction of justices. 9. Proceedings before referees.
1. Historical review. IV. Of the appeal.
2. Jurisdiction in contract. V. Of the certiorari.
3. In penal actions. VI. Proceedings subsequent to the judgment.
4, In actions on foreign judgments. 1. Of the stay of execution.
III. Proceedings in civil causes. 2. Of the transcript to bind real estate.
1. Of the summons. 3. Of the execution.
2. Of the warrant. 4. Liability of the constable.
3. Process in case of non-residents. 5. Docket-entries and transcripts.
4, Amicable actions. 6. Transcripts to other counties.
5. Judgments hy default. 7. Satisfaction of judgments.
6. Of the trial before the justice. VII. Justices’ dockets.
7. Of depositions. VIII. Proeeedings in a civil suit before a justice.
I. GENERAL NATURE OF ACTIONS AT LAW.
AN action is defined to be the formal demand of one’s right from another per-
son or party, made and insisted on in a court of justice. Ina quite common sense,
action includes all the formal proceedings in a court of justice, attendant upon the
demand of a right, made by one person or party of another, in such court, includ-
ing an adjudication upon the right, and its enforcement or denial by the court.
The vital idea of an action is, a proceeding on the part of one person, as actor,
against another, for the infringement of some right of the first, before a court of
justice, in the manner prescribed by the court or the law. The term “suit” is
a very comprehensive one, and is understood to apply to any proceeding in a court
of justice, by which an individual pursues that remedy in a court of justice, which
the law affords him. The modes of proceeding may be various ; but if a right is
litigated between parties in a court of justice, the proceeding by which the decision
of the court is sought, is a suit.2 To commence a suit is to demand something by
the institution of process in a court of justice; and to prosecute the suit is, accord-
ing to the common acceptation of language, to continue that demand.?
In general, an action lies for every violation or withholding of a legal right;
but to this general rule, there are certain well-understood legal exceptions. Thus,
a contract which is founded upon a transaction which is in violation of a statute, or
founded upon an immoral consideration, or contrary to public policy, cannot be
enforced by an action of any kind. And the test whether a demand connected with
an illegal transaction can be enforced at law is, whether the plaintiff requires the aid
of the illegal transaction to establish his case. In such cases, the maxim applies—
“ex turpi caus@ non oritur actio”—no action arises out of an immoral transaction
1 Bouv. Law Dict. 77. ¢ Bright. Dig. 388.
2 2 Pet. 464, Marswaut, C. J. 5 2 Dall. 160. 1 Y¥. 443. 73 N. Y¥.12. 93
* 6 Wheat. 408. Thid. 559, 1 Denio 595.
100 ACTIONS AT LAW.
Another example is, that no action will lie against a judge, or other person act-
ing in a judicial capacity, for an act done in such judicial capacity, however mis-
taken or erroneous may be his action, or however malicious even his motives, if he
had jurisdiction! This rule is essential to the due independence of the judicial
character.
No action can be sustained, unless the cause of action was complete and _petfect
at the institution of this suit; and this is the impetration or suing out of the writ,
So, a party plaintiff cannot split up an entire cause of action into separate parts,
and by assigning one of them to a third person, subject the defendant to more than
one suit.?
The plaintiff must commence his suit within a certain period after the cause of
action accrued, which varies according to the nature of the subject ; otherwise his
claim may be defeated by the interposition of the statute of limitations, or by the
presumption which the law allows in cases of stale or antiquated demands, that they
have been satisfied. It is not a statute to protect parties against loss of evidence
merely, but to quiet claims, and promote the security of mankind. Formerly, the
English courts were disposed against it; but, latterly, they, as well as the courts
of the United States, seem inclined, as far as possible, to retrace their steps, and
get back to the plain construction of the act.®
II. Crvin JURISDICTION OF JUSTICES.
1. Historical review.
Justices of the peace had been known to the common law of England for a cen-
tury and a half before America was discovered. They were, in their original
institution, mere conservators of the peace, exercising no judicial functions. They
were invested with judicial powers, for the first time, by the statute 834 Edw. IIL,
e. 1, and they then acquired the more honorable appellation of “justices.” But
they never exercised, in England, any jurisdiction in civil causes. The office of
justice of the peace was brought here by the English colonists; from the earliest
colonial period, it has existed in this country. But as they had no civil jurisdic-
tion in the mother country, so they had none here, except such as was conferred
upon them, from time to time, by the colonial statutes. It has frequently been
decided, that in civil cases their jurisdiction is derived altogether from statutes,
and when a cause of action is not embraced in such statutes, they can have nothing
to do with it.®
Prior to the charter of King Charles IT. to William Penn, there is no trace of
any civil jurisdiction having been conferred on justices of the peace, out of sessions.
The Duke’s Laws, originally compiled by Lord Clarendon, for New York, Long
Island and dependencies, were extended to the territories on the Delaware, by
an ordinance of Governor Andross, dated the 25th day of September 1676 ; and it
was thereby provided, that there should be held three courts of sessions, to consist
of justices of the peace, three to make a quorum, who should have power to decide
all matters under twenty pounds, without appeal; and that small matters, under the
value of five pounds, might be determined by the court, without a jury, unless
desired by the parties. .
Immediately after the arrival of William Penn, it was enacted by the first gen-
eral assembly, held at Upland, or Chester, on the 7th December 1682, ch. 76, that
all matters of debt or dues, under forty shillings, should be heard and determined,
upon suflicient evidence, by any two justices of the peace of that county where the
cause arose ; and that such justices should report their judgment to the next county
court, and the same should be recorded by the clerk of the county court as good
and binding, if the court approved the same. This was declared to be a funda
mental law, but was abrogated in council in 1693.
On the 10th May 1690, it was provided by statute, that upon complaint made of
any debt or due, under forty shillings, to any one justice of the peace, it should be
1 2 Dall. 160. 29 Leg. Int. 12. 3 Clark 411.
227. & H. Pr. 2 1618. Seo tit. Limitation of * This act is generally known as the Great
Actions. Law. Old Colonial Laws 107,
31 Ash. 130. Ibid, 152. 1 Binn. 105, 49 5 Ibid. 181,
Penn. St. 387. 1 Luz. L. Reg. 90. 8 Phila. 636,
ACTIONS AT LAW. 101
lawfal for him, upon sufficient evidence, to hear and determine the same; and in
case the party complained against would not comply with and satisfy the judgment,
then such justice should report his judgment to the next county court, and the
same should be recorded by the clerk thereof as good and binding, if the court
approved the same! This also was abrogated in council, in 1693; but was re-enacted
in the same year, by the 84th section of the Petition of Right?
In 1700, it was enacted, that upon complaint made to any justice of the peace
against any person justly indebted under the sum of forty shillings, it should be
lawful for the said justice to issue his warrant, directed to the constable, to summon
the defendant to appear before him, at such time and place as he should appoint,
and upon full hearing and good evidence, to give judgment in the matter, which
should be final and conclusive to both plaintiff and defendant, without further ap-
peal; and that execution should be awarded against the person refusing to comply
with the judgment, to levy the same upon his goods and chattels, and for want of
goods and chattels, against his body: provided that the act should not extend to
any debt for rents or contracts for real estates.
On the 28th May 1715, a law was passed, repealing all prior acts upon this sub-
ject, and regulating the proceedings before justices for the recovery of debts, under
forty shillings. On the 7th March 1745, their jurisdiction was enlarged to the
extent of ten pounds. On the 19th April 1794, their jurisdiction was further
enlarged to amounts not exceeding twenty pounds. And by the act 28th March
1804, to the amount of one hundred dollars.’ These acts were all repealed and
supplied by that of 20th March 1810,° which provides, that ‘the justices of the
peace of the several counties of this commonwealth, shall have jurisdiction of all
causes of action arising from contract, either express or implied, in all cases where
the sum demanded is not above one hundred dollars; except in cases of’ real con-
tract, where the title to lands or tenements may come in question, or action upon
promise of marriage.” It was subsequently provided by the act 7th July 1879,*
that they ‘shall have concurrent jurisdiction with the courts of common pleas of
all actions arising from contract, either express or implied, and of all actions of tres-
pass, and of trover and conversion, wherein the sum demanded does not exceed three
hundred dollars, except in cases of real contract, where the title to lands or tene-
ments may come in question, or action upon promise of marriage. The jurisdiction
of the magistrates’ courts of Philadelphia is limited to $100, by the constitution of
1874. 5
2. Jurisdiction in contract.
The act of 1810 confers upon justices jurisdiction of all causes of action arising
from contract, either express or implied. ‘The legislature, in conferring jurisdic-
tion on justices of the peace, had in view those contracts which arise immediately
out of a course of dealing between the parties, and not that sort of contract that
arises remotely out of the compact of government.” And therefore, justices have
no jurisdiction of an action on a sheriff’s bond ;# ora constable’s bond ;” nor in debt
against a sheriff for an escape; nor of an action against a constable, for not paying
arrears of rent out of the proceeds of an execution ;* nor for a militia fine, although
the plaintiff is a constable, who alleges that he has paid the amount for the defend-
ant, and seeks to recover it back as money paid, laid out and expended.® Nor have
they jurisdiction of an action to recover a balance due on a judgment of the coin-
mon pleas ;® nor on the judgment of another justice, except in the particular mode
prescribed by the act ; nor of an action for the penalty, for not entering satis-
{ Old Colonial Laws 186. 8 Purd. 1126.
2 Thid. 219. 9 Tbid. 1128.
8 Bradford’s Laws 1714, p. 43. This was the 1°13 S, & R. 103, 2 P. & W. 295. 1 Leg.
first act that empowered justices to enforce their Chron. 293,
judgments by execution. 178. & R. 367.
4 Bradford’s Laws 1728, p. 143. 12 4 W. 215.
5 2 Miller’s Laws 9. And see act 23 September 18 138. & R. 44.
1784, Pamph. 399; and act 5 April 1785, Pamph. 1 12 Penn. St. 379. s.P. 7 Luz. L. Reg. 66.
560. 1 1 Ash, 13 n.
§ 3 Dall. Laws 536. 1688. & R. 343. 12 Ibid. 58.
‘ Pamph. 383. W175. & R. 369.
102 ACTIONS AT LAW.
faction on a judgment ;! nor on a devastavit by an executor ;? a forfeited recogni-
sance ;* on a bail-bond ;* nor of an action for a legacy ;° nor in account-render ;*
or detinue.’ Nor of an action against another justice, for money collected in his
official capacity ;* or for a tort; or for jurors’ fees.” .
In all contracts there must be two or more contracting parties, and the law will
enforce upon each party the fulfilment of that portion of the contract he may have
engaged to perform ; the contract itself being for a valid consideration, and founded
in good faith. Every contract implies an assumpsit in law to perform the same; a
contract would be to no purpose if there were no means to enforce its performance.
All contracts are to be certain, perfect and complete. A contract made and entered
into upon good consideration, may, for good consideration, be dissolved. *‘ A pro-
mise,” says Blackstone, ‘is in the nature of a verbal contract, and wants nothing
but the solemnity of writing and sealing to make it absolutely the same. If, there-
fore, it be to do any explicit act, it is an express contract, as much as any covenant,
and the breach of it is an equal injury.”
Express contracts include sales, rents, or other agreements where there is a fixed
price agreed upon for the articles sold or the property rented; in such cases, the
seller of the goods, or the renter of the property, may bring suit against the pur-
chaser or the tenant for the sums which they had severally agreed to pay. If the
purchaser, however, shall pay the money agreed upon, and the goods sold shall not
be delivered according to the agreement, the purchaser may bring suit against
the seller to recover back the money he had paid; the seller having, by the
non-delivery of the articles at the time agreed upon, failed to fulfil his contract;
and farther, if the purchaser shall be able to show any damage he has sustained
‘from the non-performance of the contract, he may bring suit not only to recover
back the money he has paid, but also for damages.
When the seller of the goods undertakes their delivery to the purchaser, he is an-
awerable for such delivery, at the ¢me and place and in the condition agreed upon.
But if the purchaser undertake to provide a conveyance, or direct that the goods
be sent bya particular carrier or a certain line of stages, if the seller sends the
goods purchased, according to the directions of the buyer, and they miscarry,
or come too late, or get damaged, the purchaser must suffer the loss. The reason
for this difference is obvious ; in the first case, the carrier of the goods is the agent
of the sedler, and in the second case, the carrier of the goods is the agent of the
purchaser. :
Where there is no agreement, that is, as to rent, between the owner of a property
and the occupant, the owner may recover reasonable satisfaction for the tenements
which have been occupied, in an action for use and occupation. 'Fhis, however, is
an implied contract. ‘Implied contracts,” says the same author, “ are such as rea-
son and justice dictate, and which, therefore, the law presumes that every man has
contracted to perform: and, upon this presumption, makes him answerable to such
persons as suffer by his non-performance.”’ For example, on such presumption suits
are brought to recover back money paid in mistake; or through decezt; or by
extortion ; or imposition. If a person employ another to do any work or service,
the law implies, or presumes, that the employer undertook to pay the person he
employed, a reasonable compensation, such as is usually paid for such work or ser-
vices in the vicinity where the work was done, or the services rendered. The law
also, with equal reason and justice, presumes the person employed engages to do the
work, or render the service in such a manner, as such work or such services are
usually done, and to be content with the compensation usually paid in that neigh-
borhood for such work and services.
The law raises a similar implication, where a person buys goods from another with-
out. agreeing upon the price to be paid; and in an infinite variety of other cases the
; 13'S. & R. 102. 92P.& W. 292. 1 Ash. 130. Ibid. 152. 12
12 Ibid. 58. Penn. St. 379. 8 W.179. Otherwise, if the dam-
: 17 Thid. 370, ° ages have been ascertained by a reference. 1 Y.
; re a He Fs where the party has a right to waive
. 59. e tort, and fi i
: 10 Tbid. 229. 5 Wh. 452. 1 Y. 248. Be eee et en
1T. & H. Pr. 3 919 vo. 10
tee 3 D 3 Luz. L. Obs. 394.
ACTIONS AT LAW. 103
game presumption is assumed; as on promissory notes, orders, due-bills; also to
recover back money paid to one acting under a void authority; money paid, laid
out, and expended to the use of another, or at his request; or for money had and
received by the defendant to the use of the plaintiff; or for goods sold and deliv-
ered ; or for work and labor done; or for neglect of duty or non-performance of
engagements ; as, where a person loses goods or clothing, &c., at an inn; or where
a common carrier, from negligence, fails to deliver the property he had been hired
to convey ; or a farrier injures a horse in shoeing him; or a tailor, milliner, shoe-
maker or other mechanic does the work he has undertaken to do in an unskilful or
uoworkmanlike manner.
In these, and in such like cases, though no agreement shall have been made, yet
there exists a legal liability, and the law presumes that the party promised to pay
the debt, or perform the duty, and on failure the party injured has a right to
redress. There is also an extensive class of contracts, implied by reason and con-
struction of law, which arises from the presumption that every one who undertakes
any office, employment, trust or duty, contracts with those who employ him, or
intrust him, to perform its duties, with integrity, diligence and skill. If, from
a want of any of these qualities, injury accrues to individuals, they have their
remedy by legal proceedings.
Justices have jurisdiction of an action on an insolvent bond ;! an award ;? a bail-
ment ;3 for the recovery of ground-rent ;* for fees ;5 for the penalty for taking ille-
gal fees ;* for unliquidated damages for breach of contract ;7 in assumpsit, for
carelessness in the performance of work ;® of an action against executors for money
paid by a devisee, which is properly chargeable to the residuary estate ;? or against
a constable for selling goods exempt by law.
The act of 1810 restricts the jurisdiction to cases where the demand is not above
$100. Under this clause, it has been held, that a plaintiff may sue before a justice
for a balance of less than $100, although his claim originally exceeded that
amount." Where there have been mutual dealings, or partial payments on account,
it has ever been the practice to sue before a justice.” But where the plaintiff’s
demand has not been reduced by payments, or by mutual dealings between the par-
ties, to the statutory standard, he cannot give jurisdiction by remitting part, and
suing for the balance.® He may, however, remit a part or the whole of the inter-
est due on his claim, so as to bring the case within the jurisdiction :* but there
must be a formal relinquishment of all interest over $100. Where, however, both
the plaintiff's demand and the defendant’s set-off exceed $100, the plaintiff can-
not give jurisdiction to the justice, by admitting one item of set-off, and disputing
the residue of the defendant’s claim.® A judgment will not be reversed, because,
on appeal a declaration is filed for a greater sum than $100." So, a payee of sev-
eral promissory notes, amounting in the aggregate to more than $100, may bring
several suits before a justice.® Anda justice has jurisdiction of a scire facias to
revive a judgment entered before another justice, whose commission has expired,
though the interest increase the claim to more than $100.” ;
‘The jurisdiction conferred on justices, in civil cases, is not exclusive of that of
the common pleas; the original jurisdiction of that court is without limit as to
amount ;” but, by the act of 1810, § 26,7 “If any person or persons shall com-
mence, sue or prosecute any suit or suits, for any debt or debts, demand or demands,
made cognisable as aforesaid, in any other manner than is directed by this act, and
shall obtain a verdict or judgment therein, which, without costs of suit, shall not
12P.& W.462. 3 Ibid. 64. 1 Del. Co. R.354. W.N. C. 64.
37 Penn. St. 134. 13 37 Penn. St. 387. 73 Ibid. 427. 81 Ibid.
87 W.175. Ibid. 542, 439. 3 W. N. ©. 291. 11 Ibid. 206. 1 Leg.
43P.& W. 361. Chron. 170. 3 Luz. L. Reg. 148. 2 Chest. Co.
5 4 Binn. 167. R. 296.
67 W. 491. 14 45 Penn. St. 235. 1 Penny. 51. 1 Chest. Co.
11 Phila. 254, 2 Kulp 393. R. 479.
8 31 Penn. St. 14. 15 10 W. N.C. 388. 39 Leg. Int, 13.
9 32 Ibid. 309. 16 1 Leg. Gaz. 91.
1 3 Gr. 240, 178 Penn. St. 465. 11 Ibid. 280. 37 Ibid. 390.
31] Am. L. Reg, 440. | 18 18 Penn. St. 162.
1211 Penn. St. 281. See 16 8. & R.255. 5 1 6 Phila. 332, 8 Ibid. 337,
Whart. +94, 1P.&W.21. 3Ibid. 525. 1W.&S. % 1 T. & H. Pr. 3 21.
67. 7 Ibid. 434. 4 Penn. St. 330. 81 Ibid. 439. 15 % Purd. 1127.
104 ACTIONS AT LAW.
amount to more than one hundred dollars, not having caused an oath or affirmation
to be made, before the obtaining-of the writ of summons or capias, and having
filed the same in the prothonotary’s office of such county, that he, she or they so
making oath or affirmation, did truly believe the debt due or damages sustained,
exceeding the sum of one hundred dollars, he, she or they so prosecuting shall not
recover costs in such suit.”
Under this section, it has been determined, that if the amount be reduced below
$100, by evidence of set-off, the plaintiff will recover costs, without an affidavit ;)
and so, where it is reduced below $100, by evidence of a special contract to pay
the debt of a third person? But it is otherwise, where the amount is reduced by
direct payments. Where the plaintiff, in an action in the common pleas, on a con-
tract, recovers less than $100. and there is nothing on the record to show that the
demand was reduced by set-off, the presumption is, that it was within the jurisdic-
tion of a justice* The act of 1879, increasing the jurisdiction of justices to $300,
contains no such provision in respect to costs; it merely confers on justices, in the
cases enumerated, concurrent jurisdiction with the courts of common pleas.
The act of 1810 excepts from the jurisdiction of justices cases of real contract,
where the title to lands or tenements may come in question, and actions upon pro-
mise of marriage. This excludes from their cognisance every suit on a contract
concerning or in any way connected with realty. A justice has no jurisdiction
where the title to land may come in question, directly or indirectly ;” as of an action
on a note given in consideration of a right to dig a mill-race, and conduct water
across the plaintiff’s land. An action for the balance of the purchase-money of a
lot of ground, is within the exception of the statute ;° so is one to recover back
money paid on a contract for the sale of land, which is afterwards rescinded because
of a defect of title ; or to recover damages for a deficiency in quantity, in the sale of
land.” and being an existing
demand which may be enforced by action, the defendant must set off the same or be
for ever barred.® If the set-off, however, exceed $100, it must be rejected as beyond
the jurisdiction of the justice.’ But if the defendant’s demand be composed of
several items, he may set off such of them as do not exceed the jurisdiction ;* the
law does not, however, compel him to doso.® And though the justice’s judgment
is a bar to a cross-demand not set up on the trial before him, yet, if there be an
appeal from the judgment, such set-off may be established on the trial of the appeal.’
A debtor has a perfect right to purchase a claim, and use it as a set-off;" but he
must show that it was assigned to him, before suit brought.”
The act provides for a rehearing, where there has been judgment by default, and
the defendant has a set-off against the plaintiff’s demand, which would otherwise be
barred. In general, a justice has no power to open his judgment, except under the
circumstances, and in the manner provided by the statute.“ But though this be so,
as to a judgment regularly entered, he may open a judgment by default, which was
irregularly entered without service of process on the defendant.4 It was decided,
as early as 1702, that a new trial cannot be granted by an inferior court, upon the
merits.“ It seems, that even the courts of common pleas have no power to open
their judgments, obtained adversely, after the expiration of the term at which they
were entered.¢
Justices have no jurisdiction to enter judgment upon a warrant of attorney ;!” but
the act of 1810 provides that in all cases of bonds, bills or notes, containing a waiver
or stay of execution, any justice may, on application to him, after such bond, bill or
note becomes due, issue a summons and proceed to hear and determine the same
as in other cases; and on judgment being rendered in favor of the plaintiff, he may
issue execution thereon, without stay. Yet in case of judgment by default, the
defendant shall, at any time within twenty days thereafter, be entitled to arehearing
or appeal, though execution may have issued. The defendant may, however,
embody in his contract a waiver of the right to appeal from any judgment rendered
against him for the same; and in such case he will be bound by the decision of
the justice, unless under special circumstances.”
13 Luz. L. Reg. 35. See 2 Del. Co. R. 355. 114 W.N. C. 476.
214. Law Rev. 11, 12 29 Penn. St. 192.
35 W.& 8. 459. 15 Penn. St. 361. 1 Ash.171, 13 1 Phila. 520. Ibid. 515. 5 Ibid. 468. 8 Ibid.
2 Ibid. 146. 1 Lack. L. Rec. 404. 2 Kulp 311. 546. Ibid. 299. 8 W. N.C. 28.
4 Pard. 1134, 14 21 Leg. Int. 340.
54 W. & 8.290. 6 Ibid. 155. 15 Penn. St.362. 15 2 Salk. 650. 2 Mod. 84. Sayer 202. .
6 15 Penn. St. 361. . 16 2 W. 378-80. 6 Ibid.513. 33 Penn. St. 485.
7 37 Ibid. 456. See 2 Brewst. 124~7.
83P.& W. 469. 3 Luz. L. Reg. 71. 7 1 Binn. 105.. 1 Chest. Co. R. 65.
® 3 Penn. St. 459. 1 Purd. 1134.
0 2 Gr. 150. 1 8 W. 371-2. And see 91 Penn. &t. 385.
8
°
114 ACTIONS AT LAW.
Justices are empowered by the act of 1722, § 8,1 to issue subpwnas into any
county or place within the state, for summoning any persons to give evidence with
respect to any matter triable before them ; and to enforce the attendance of such
witnesses by attachment. : .
If the defendant be not ready for trial, and show cause for an adjournment, in a
case in which he is not liable to arrest, the act of 1842 provides, that he shall give
a bond or recognisance, conditioned that no part of his property, which is liable to
be taken in execution, shall be removed, secreted or in any way disposed of, except
for the necessary support of himself and family, until the plaintiff's demand shall
be satisfied, or until the expiration of ten days after such plaintiff shall be :u.tled
to have an execution issued on the judgment obtained in such cause, if Le’ shall
obtain such judgment; and if the condition of such bond or recognisance be
broken, and an execution on such judgment be returned unsatisfied in whole or in
part, the plaintiff in an action on such bond or recognisance, shall be entitled to
recover the value of the property so removed, secreted or assigned.’ A sale under a
subsequent execution is a breach of such recognisance ;* and so is a general assign-
ment for the benefit of creditors. In an action on the recognisance, parol evidence
is admissible, that the defendant had goods at the time it was acknowledged.®
It is provided by statute, that it shall be the duty of justices of the peace and
aldermen of this commonwealth, to render judgment, in any cause or causes pending
before them, within a period of ten days after all the evidence in said causes shall
have been heard. And that any justice of the peace or alderman of this common-
wealth, who shall fail to comply with the provisions of the act, shall be guilty of a
misdemeanor, and upon conviction, shall be fined in any sum not exceeding one
hundred dollars." It is held in New York, where a similar law prevails, that a
failure to enter judgment within the time prescribed, deprives the justice of juris-
diction over the case ;* but that a compliance with the provisions of the statute may
be waived by agreement of the parties® If the last day fall on Sunday, he must
give judgment on the preceding day.!? But this does not appear to be necessary
under our act of 1883, relating to the computation of time.Y
7. Of Depositions.
Upon the affidavit of either party, or their agent, that the testimony of any
material witness is wanted, who resides out of the county, or from his infirmity of
body or other causes, cannot be obtained personally, the cause shall be postponed
to a certain day, within such reasonable time as the distance of the witness, the
season of the year, and the circumstance of the road, may render it proper, to obtain
the deposition of the witness wanted; and whenever a cause is postponed at the
instance of the defendant, he shall enter into a recognisance for a sum sufficient to
cover the demand in question, together with the costs, with ove sufficient surety,
conditioned, as prescribed by the act of 1842, that no part of his property, liable
to be taken in execution shall be removed, secreted, assigned, or in any way dis-
posed of, except for the necessary support of himself and family, until the plaintiff's
demand shall be satisfied, or until the expiration of ten days after the plaintiff shall
be entitled to execution on his judgment, if such judgment be obtained. And
whenever a rule for taking the deposition of a witness or witnesses shall be applied
for, as aforesaid, the party so applying shall file a copy of the interrogatories or
questions intended to be asked the witnesses, and a copy of such interrogatories
or questions shall be delivered to the opposite party or his ageut, who may also file
such additional questions as he may think proper: Provided, The same be done
within four days after the receipt of such copy. Which rule and interrogatories
being certified by the justice before whom the cause is depending, shall be sufficient
authority for the justice who may be named in said rule, to take the answers of
such witnesses as may be therein named ; but where the witnesses reside in the
1 Purd. 1131. 7 Act 22 3
2 See tit. “ Attachment for Contempt.” 8 1 Hilt. te ae aero e
8 Act 12 July 1842 333, Purd. 1135, 9 {1 Barb. 98. 5 Daly 278.
4 13 Penn. St. 86. 10 6 Daly 521, att
§ 8 Clark 259. 1 See tit “Time
8 4 Ponn. St. 339. :
ACTIONS AT LAW, 115
county, or in cases where the parties or their agents agree to enter a rule to take
depositions, it may be done, without filing interrogatories, upon notice given, agree-
able to the rule, of the time and place appointed for the examination of the
witnesses; and testimony so taken shall be read in evidence on the trial before
the justice or referees The act of 11th April 1863, dispenses with the filing
of interrogatories, except when depositions are to be taken without the state.
The justice should be particular in obeying the injunction to postpone the cause
to a day certain, as an indefinite adjournment is equivalent to a discontinuance
of the case, unless the parties, by agreement and appearance, consent to its being
taken up again.
In all cases where a suit is pending before a justice of the peace, either party
may obtain testimony out of the state, in the same manner. In all such cases,
where it shall not be convenient to take the testimony of witnesses before a justice
of the peace, it shall be lawful for the party or parties to name a commissioner,
who on receiving a certificate of his appointment, with a copy of the rule and
interrogatories, certified by the alderman or justice of the peace, shall have
authority to administer oaths and affirmations, and take the answers of witnesses
therein named; and depositions so taken shall be as good to all intents and pur-
poses as if the same were taken before a justice of the peace?
In all cases where 2 commission shall be issued from, or a rule be taken in any
court of record in this commonwealth, or from any justice of the peace or alder-
man, under the act entitled “‘an act to amend and consolidate with its several
supplements, the act entitled ‘an act for the recovery of debts and demands not
exceeding one hundred dollars before a justice of the peace, and for the election of
constables, and for other purposes,’ ’’ and of the supplement thereto, passed on the
30th day of March 1829, for the examination of witnesses, it shall be competent
for the person or persons named in or authorized by such commission or rule, to
issue subpeenas to such witnesses as may be requested by any of the parties con-
cerned, requiring their attendance at a certain day, hour and place therein desig-
nated, having regard to the distance of such witnesses, and under a penalty not
exceeding one hundred dollars.*
In case of the non-attendance of such witnesses, it shall be lawful for such com-
missioner, or person or persons duly authorized as aforesaid, on proof, by oath or
affirmation, of the due service of the subpoena, to issue process of attachment
against the defaulting witness; whereupon the same proceedings shall be had; as
are used and allowed in like cases, in the courts of record of this commonwealth.
The party injured by such non-attendance shall also be entitled to the same remedies
at law against the person subpoenaed, as are provided when a subpana is issued
from a court of record.§ ;
If the person subpoenaed shall attend, but refuse to testify, he shall be liable to
the same proceedings on the part of the commissioners, or persons authorized ag
aforesaid, as if he had appeared and refused to testify in a court of record.®
A defaulting witness, when brought in on an attachment, is called up to purge
himself of the alleged contempt, which if he do to the satisfaction of the court, he
is dismissed without more; but if he fail to purge himself, the court adjudges him
guilty of contempt, and imposes the costs of the attachment, and such additional
fine as, in their discretion, the case seems to demand ; and in default of payment,
he may be committed to jail to compel execution of the sentence. But he cannot
be sentenced to imprisonment for such a contempt; this is forbidden by the act of
16th June 1836,’ which provides that all contempts, except such as shall be com-
mitted in open court, shall be punished by fine only.
A witness who refuses to be sworn in a court of record, is guilty of a contempt
punishable by fine and imprisonment. And the same power is vested in an alder-
man, or commissioner appointed to take depositions under this act; but it must
be shown that he refused to answer questions pertinent to the issue. The proper
1 Act 20 March 1810 3 8. Purd. 1135. Act 5 Thid.
12 July 1842 3°33, Purd. 1135. 6 Ibid. 2 Clark. 340.
2 Purd. 1136. 7 Purd. 382.
5 Act 30 March 1829. Pura. 1135. 8 2 Law Times (N. S.) 67. And see 39 Leg.
* Act 26 February 1831. Purd. 1135. Int. 256.
116 ACTIONS AT LAW.
practice is, to obtain a rule to show cause why an attachment should not issue.!
But though a commissioner or justice appointed to take depositions may commit for
such contempt, the commitment must be definite as to time.”
8. Trials by jury.
In all actions arising before justices of the peace in the county of Erie,’ where
the sum demanded by the plaintiff shall exceed fifty dollars, either the plaintiff or
defendant may demand a jury trial; in which case the justice shall proceed to
impannel a jury of six, in the manner provided by the act of the 1st day of May,
Anno Domini 1861,‘ entitled “an act to change the mode of criminal proceedings
in Eric and Union counties,” and the several supplements thereto; and the mode
of procedure shall be the same as in said act provided, so far as may be applicable
to civil proceedings; and the successful party shall be entitled to recover full
costs; Provided, That before the defendant shall be permitted to demand a jury
trial, he shall make and file an affidavit with said justice, that he has a just and
legal defence to the whole or a part of the plaintiff’s claim, and if to a part, he shall
state how much the plaintiff is justly entitled to recover; and if the plaintiff
shall not accept the offer of the defendant, he shall not recover costs, in the event
that he shall not obtain a judgment for a larger sum than the amount admitted by
the defendant. In case of a jury trial, under the provisions of this act, the justice
shall be entitled to the sum of one dollar per day, in addition to the other fees
allowed by law to justices of the peace®
In all actions founded upon contract, express or implied, brought before a justice
of the peace of the county of Erie, in which the defendant shall claim a set-off ©
or payment, exceeding fifty dollars, either party may demand a trial by jury of
six, to be chosen in the manner provided by the act to which this is a supplement.
The jurors may be selected from the township, borough or ward in which the
justice trying the cause may hold his office, and the adjoining townships, boroughs
and wards, in the discretion of the justice ; and either party shall have the right
to challenge any of the jury for cause, at any time before they are sworn.
All vacancies in the number of jurors that may happen by absence, challenge or
other cause, shall be supplied by the justice writing down three names for each
vacancy, and the parties shall proceed to strike out, until the requisite numbers
to fill the vacancies are left. In all cases of the selection of a jury, or filling
vacancies in their number, if either party shall refuse or neglect to strike out
the names as directed, the justice shall act forsuch party in striking out the
names.’
If any jury shall be unable to agree upon a verdict, and the justice shall be fully
satisfied of that fact, he shall have power to discharge them, after giving notice to
the parties, their agents or attorneys, of his intention to do so; and the said jus-
tice shall then fix a time, not more than three days thereafter, at which another jury
shall be chosen; and after such new jury are chosen, they shall be immediately
summoned by the constable, upon a new venire, to be issued by the justice for that
purpose, and the new trial shall proceed forthwith, unless the same shall be
adjourned for some cause shown.®
The only remedy which the party aggrieved by any act of the justice or the jury,
done under the provisions of this act, or the act to which this is a supplement,
shall be by an appeal to the court of common pleas of Erie county, within twenty
days after final judgment: Provided, That if the defendant shall prove to the satis-
faction of a judge of said court, that he had no knowledge of the proceedings before
the justice, until the twenty days for appeal had expired, and that no summons was
legally served upon him, said judge may order a writ of certioraré to be issued ; and
: Bee Nat 127. February 1872, Pamph. 190. And see Act 6
: ar : April 1870, providing for jury trials, in Mercer
Extended to Venango county, by act 18 Feb- county. Pamph. 987, :
pry An pe to Lopirenes county by 4 Purd. 1154,
ao ebruary ,» Pamph. 254; and to Craw- 5 Act 18
ford county, by act 28 March 1870, Pamph. 586. § Act 28 Mane ee me
And this act, and the supplementary act of 28 T Tbid. : : .
March 1870 (with the exception of the 8th sec- 8 Ibid.
tion), are extended to Warren county, by act 29
ACTIONS AT LAW. 117
upon the defendant entering into recognisance, with sufficient surety, to pay the
debt and costs in case the proceedings before the justice shall be affirmed, all pro.
ceedings before the justice shall be stayed, until the determination of the court on
the writ of certiorari}
The jury shall be the judges of both the law and the facts of the case: Provided,
That the justice shall have power to exclude such evidence from the jury as has no
relation to the matter trying ; and the said jury may ask the opinion of said justice
upon the law of the case, in the presence of the parties or their counsel, at any time
before rendering the verdict.?
It has been decided by the supreme court, that the act of 1861, for the trial of
petty offences by a justice and a jury of six, does not conflict with the provisions
of the constitution® This appears to settle the question of the constitutionality of
the acts conferring a like jurisdiction in civil cases.
9. Proceedings before Referees.
The 3d section of the act of 1810 provides, that if the plaintiff’s demand shall
exceed $5.33, and either party shall refuse to submit the determination of the cause
to the justice, he shall in that case request them to chcose referees, one, two or
three each, and mutually to agree upon a third, fifth or seventh man, all of whom
shall be sworn or affirmed, “ well and truly to try all matters in variance between
the parties submitted to them ;” and on having heard their proofs and allegations,
they, or a majority of them, shall make out an award, under their hands, and trans-
mit the same to such justice, who shall thereupon enter judgment for the sum
awarded, and costs, and shall allow each of the said referees fifty cents per day
for his service ;* which judgment so obtained, when not exceeding twenty dollars,
shall be final and conclusive to both plaintiff and defendant, without further appeal ;
and it shall be the duty of the justice to notify, through a constable or some fit
person, each of the referees so chosen, of their appointment, and of the time and
place fixed for a hearing; and if any person so chosen and notified as aforesaid
shall neglect or refuse to serve, he shall, for every such neglect or refusal, unless
prevented by sickness or some other unavoidable cause, forfeit and pay the sum of
two dollars for the use of the poor, and where there are no poor, to be paid to the
supervisors of the roads, to be applied by them in repairing the streets or public
highways of the city or township in which such person or persons so refusing or
neglecting shall reside, which fine shall be recovered before such justice of the
peace, on complaint of the party injured, as other fines are by law recoverable :
Provided, That an action be brought within thirty days after such neglect or
refusal.®
No action brought before a justice of the peace or alderman shall be referred to
referees for trial, unless by agreement or express consent of both parties to the
action, or their agents; which agreement or assent shall be noted by such justice
or alderman upon his docket.®
If any referee appointed under the 3d section of the act to which this is a sup-
plement, or under an act regulating the proceedings of justices of the peace and
aldermen, in cases of trespass, trover and rent, shall not attend at the time and place
fixed for hearing the cause, it shall be the duty of the referee or referees present
(where the parties cannot agree on the person or persons to supply the vacancy,
or where only one of the parties attends), to appoint proper persons in place of those
who may be absent, and the referees thus appointed shall have the same authority
as those originally appointed.”
The said referees shall be sworn or affirmed by an alderman or justice of the
peace, or they may swear or affirm each other, and then any of them shall have
power to administer oaths or affirmations to witnesses, in the cause before them ; and
the said referees, or a majority of them, shall have power to adjourn their meetings
to any other time or place, and as often as they may deem proper.®
1 Purd. 1153. should be one dollar per day. See tit. “* Tres-
2 Thid. pass and Trover.”
5 101 Penn. St. 560. s,p.74 N.Y. 406. 84 5 Purd. 1133.
Ibid. 240. 23 Hun, 374. 6 Act 26 April 1855. Purd. 1136. See 1
4 The act of 1814, conferring jurisdiction upon Wood. 492. _
justices in trespass and trover, provided that 7 Act 26 March 1814. Purd. 1136.
the compensation of referees under that act 8 Ibid.
118 ACTIONS AT LAW.
Referees, or arbitrators, as aforesaid, or a majority of them, shall also have power
to punish by fine, not exceeding twenty dollars, all persons, whether parties, wit-
nesses or others, who shall be guilty of disorderly conduct in their presence, or who
shall insult, disturb or interrupt the said referees or arbitrators, when in business,
which fine shall be recovered as follows: The said referees or arbitrators, or a
majority of them, shall make out a certificate in the following form, viz. :
We, the undersigned referees (or arbitrators, as the case may be), do certify that A. B.
this day, at , in the county of , before us, did conduct himself in a disor-
derly manner (or as the case may be), tending to insult, disturb and interrupt us in the
trial of a certain cause wherein C. D. is plaintiff and E. F. is defendant, for which offence
we have fined him, the said A. B., the sum of dollars, which sum you are hereby
required to collect according to law. (Signed by the Arbitrators or Referees.)
The certificate aforesaid shall be transmitted to an alderman or justice of the
peace of the proper city or county, who is hereby required to make a record thereof,
and issue execution to collect the same, in the manner that judgments under one
dollar, are by law collected; and the sum, when collected, shall be paid by such
alderman or justice to the county treasurer, for the use of the county in which the
offence may have been committed
The prothonotary of the court in which the suit shall be depending, or any
alderman or justice of the peace, shall have power to issue subpanas for witnesses
to appear before the arbitrators.’
All fines and forfeitures incurred under any of the provisions of this act shall,
unless it be otherwise provided, be sued for before an alderman or justice of the
peace, in the same manner that debts of equal amount are recoverable.
The referees may adjourn, before being sworn,‘ but after they have all met and
been sworn, vacancies cannot be supplied. No authority is given to supply a
second vacancy. A justice may set aside an award of referees appointed by con-
sent, in a cause pending before him, for malfeasance; and if the grounds of his
action do not. appear, the court must presume they were sufficient.’ The award
merges in the judgment. The record must show that the referees, as well as
the justice, acted in conformity with the statute.®
IV. OF THE APPEAL.
The act of 1810 confers the right of appeal to the court of common pleas from
the judgment of the justice: 1. In case of judgment by default for an amount
exceeding $5.33: 2. In case of an adversary judgment for a like amount, on a trial
before the justice; or from a judgment on an award of referees for more than
$20. And the act of 1845 provides that the right of appeal shall be enjoyed by
defendants in all cases in which plaintiffs have the same right."° This makes
the right of appeal reciprocal in all cases; but it does not extend the plaintiff's
right of appeal; and consequently, where, previously, the plaintiff had no right of
appedl, this act does not confer such right on the defendant.? If the plaintiff's
claim exceed $5.33, and there is a judgment for the defendant, on a trial before the
justice, the plaintiff has the right of appeal.’* And so, where the plaintiff’s demand
exceeds $20 and referees find for the defendant, or reduce the claim more than $20,
the plaintiff is entitled to an appeal.* But in such case, if the plaintiffs’ demand
do not exceed $20, he can have no appeal.’ It is the amount of the demand in
controversy, and not the amount of the judgment, that regulates the right of
appeal.6 Where the sum sued for by the plaintiff, and set forth on the docket
of the justice, is reduced by the judgment on an award of referees, more than $20,
an appeal lies for the plaintiff, although the judgment is for a less sum than
1 Act 16 June 1836, Purd. 132. ® 3 Leg. Gaz. 260.
H Pard. 133. 10 Act 20 March 1845. Purd. 1139.
Tbid. 1111 Penn, St. 410.
41S. &R. 231. 6 Ibid. 275, 22 25 Ibid. 340,
5 7 W. 495, B48. &R. 72.
: Ibid. 14 12 Ibid. 388.
: 9 Penn. St. 106. 1 2 Thid. 463. 12 Ibid. 385. 3 P. & W174
39 Ibid. 274. 1 2W. 304. 48. &R.72. 2 Kalp 419,
ACTIONS AT LAW. 119
$20.1 And in such case the defendant is likewise entitled to an appeal, by the act
of 1845.2 But if the plaintiff claim $25, and there is an award in his favor for
eh neither party can appeal. The amount in controversy may be shown by
arol.*
: An appeal lies from a judgment for a penalty, exceeding $5.33 ;§ from a judg-
ment on a scire facias ;° by a constable against whom a judgment has been entered
for not paying over money collected on an execution ;* and by the plaintiff, if the
judgmeat be in favor of the defendant.® A defendant may appeal from a judg-
ment by confession ; a party is not bound by an admission made in ignorance of
his ‘rights. And if he have a cross-demand exceeding $5.38, and the decision
of the justice be against the set-off, he is entitled to an appeal; but it must be a
bond fide claim to set off." One of two defendants may appeal, although the other
comes into court and disclaims ;” but he may be severed, and the appeal be prose-
cuted by the other."* A justice is not liable to an action for refusing an appeal ;
the remedy is, by applicativn to the court. The defendant cannot have both an
appeal and certiorari." The parties may waive the right of appeal ;° but it must be
by agreement‘in writing.”
The statute provides that the appeal must be taken within twenty days after
judgment being given.* In computing the time, the day of judgment is to be
excluded ;” and if the 20th day fall on Sunday, the appeal may be entered on the
next day.” If the justice, by mistake, refuse an appeal, it may subsequently be
entered, after the twenty days." The entry ofa rule to show cause why the judg-
ment should not be opened, after the expiration of the twenty days, does not give the
right of appeal, on the discharge of the rule ;* but if the rule be taken within
the twenty days, it extends the time for entering an appeal.” It is too late to enter
an appeal, after the money is made on an execution, although within the twenty
days.”
If the parties are dismissed, before an appeal is made, the justice shall, at the
instance of the appellant, notify, through a constable or other fit person, the adverse
party to appear before him, on some day certain; and if the parties shall appear on
the day appointed, it shall be in the power of the justice, with consent of the parties
or their agents, to open his judgment and give them another hearing ; but if they
will not agree to such rehearing, the party appellant shall be bound® in a recogni-
sance, as bail absolute, in double the probable amount of costs accrued and likely,
to accrue in such case, with one or more sufficient sureties, conditioned for the pay-
ment of all costs accrued or that may be legally recovered against the appellant.¥
In case of a corporation appellant (municipal corporations excepted) the bail shall
be taken absolute for the payment of the debt, interest and costs, in the affirmance
of the judgment.” Executors and administrators, are entitled to appeal, without
11 18 Penn. St. 78-9.
1128. & R. 388. 9 W.17. 3 Penn. St. 454.
11 Jhid. 410. 12215. & R. 492.
211 Penn. St. 410. 18 2 Ibid. 107.
8 25 Ibid. 340. And see 2 Phila, 291. 14 2 Luz. L. Obs. 321.
42 W. 304. 1 Luz. L. Reg. 21, 15 1 Brewst. 406.
5168. & R. 243. The act of 17 April 1876, 12S. &R.114. 8 W. 372. 1 Ash 92.
Purd.1142.provides, that either party may appeal 1775S. & R. 366.
from the judgment of a magistrate, or a court not
of record, in a suit fora penalty, to the court of
common pleas of the county in which such judg-
ment shall be rendered, upon allowance of said
eoert, or any judges thereof, upon cause shown ;
and upon such terms as to payment of costs, and
entering bail, as the judge or court allowing the
appeal shall direct. In this act, there is no limi-
tation as to the amount of the judgment. An
appeal taken without such allowance, will be
stricken off. 2 Del. Co. R. 333. The appeal must
be allowed by the appellate court ; the magistrate
has no power to grant it. 16 W.N.C.311. 42
Leg. Int. 415. 4
6358. & RB. 93.
7 3 Bright. Dig. 3454,
84 W. & &. 278.
9 25 Penn. St. 409.
02P.& W.120. 2 W. 304.
18 Where the time for entering an appeal is fixed
by statute, the court has no power to enlarge it,
even on cause shown. 2 Luz. L. Obs. 194. 22
N.Y. 319. And see 14 W.N. C. 456.
193 8. & R.496. 29 Penn. St. 525. 3 Phila,
425.
23 PL.& W. 201. 4 Penn. St. 515. 1 W. WN.
C. 64.
21168. & R.421. 2 Ash. 224,
221 Phila. 425. See 3 Penn. St. 211.
106. 2 Clark 318.
23 2 Ash, 224,
2 7 W. 337.
% Act 20 March 1810 3 4. Purd. 1139. See 1
L. Law Rev. 19. Ibid. 201.
26 Act 20 March 1845. Purd. 1139.
2115 March 1847. Purd. 1140. 9 S. & R. 257.
4 Luz. L. Reg. 8.
9 Ibid.
120 ACTIONS AT LAW.
bail, by the act of 1810;! guardians, by the act of 27th March 1833 ;? and muni.
cipal corporations, by the act of 21st April 1858 § 8.° :
The appellant need not join with his surety in the recognisance.* It should be
taken in a sum certain.> But arecognisance “ in $20, or such sum as may be neces-
sary to pay all costs that have or may accrue in the case, in prosecuting this
appeal,” was held sufficient.° After the defendant has had the benefit of his appeal,
an objection that the recognisance contained no penalty will not be allowed to pre-
vail.?’ Ifa defect exist in the form of the recognisance, the practice is, to apply to
the court for arule upon the appellant to perfect his appeal within a given time, or
show cause why it should not be dismissed ; it would be error to quash the appeal
in the first instance. And this applies to an appeal granted erroneously, on the
defendant’s own recognisance and plea of freehold.® An objection to the form of
the recognisance will be waived, by any step taken to prepare the case for trial.”
Where an appeal does not lie, no waiver will give jurisdiction; but where an appeal
does lie, the party may, by treating it as regularly in court, waive a defect which
would otherwise be fatal.” .
Until the transcript is actually filed, the justice retains the right to decide on the
sufficiency of the bail? And the defendant cannot defeat the justice’s jurisdiction,
by filing the transcript, after notice that his bail is excepted to.* Where, however,
the common pleas is in possession of a case, in the shape of an appeal, although
defectively entered, the function of the justice terminates™* The rule of court as
to attorneys not becoming bail, does not apply to the entry of security before a
justice.S The bail is liable, though the appeal was dismissed, because entered too
late. But not for the costs of an unproductive execution.” The entry of bail for
an appeal, though it may stay the immediate execution of a ft. fa. or other final
process, will not avoid all that has been done under such proceedings ; in order
fully to supersede the execution, it is necessary to perfect the appeal, by bringing
it into court.% If, however, the execution be returned, the lien is gone, though the
appeal be never perfected.’®
If' the party appellant shall enter bail to appeal, within twenty days after judg-
ment being given as aforesaid, such appeal shall be effectual, in case such party
appellant shall file the transcript of the record of the justice, in the prothonotary’s
office, on or before the first day of the next term of the court of common pleas of
the proper county, after entering such bail as aforesaid.” In Philadelphia, the
appeal must be filed on or before the next monthly return-day.4_ The appeal must
be filed to the next term, though the twenty days may not have then expired.”
But a defective appeal may be withdrawn, and other bail entered, within the
twenty days, though a return-day has intervened.* The appeal need not be filed
within twenty days after the judgment; it is enough, that it be entered on the
docket of the court, at any time before the next return-day.* A party who makes
the justice his agent for the purpose of filing his appeal, is not entitled to relief,
if the justice neglects to do so.% If the defendant file his appeal, but neglect to
enter an appearance, and cannot be found, judgment may be taken for want of an
appearance.
In all cases where an appeal is taken from a judgment of a justice of the peace
or alderman, and the appellant neglects or refuses to file the same in the prothono-
1 Purd.1139. And see 1 Wood. 216. 18 14 W. N.C. 438.
2 Thid. ™ 12 Phila, &.
3 See 1 Phila. 402. W 2 Luz. L. Obs. 332.
4 6 Binn. 52. 18 29 Penn. St. 240. Purd. 1132, note b.
51P.& W.9. 11 Penn. St. 291. 19 39 Penn. St. 28-4.
6 14 Penn. St. 158. See 19 Ibid. 356. 20 Act 20 March 1810 3 4, Purd. 1141.
1 22 Ibid. 33. And see 38 Ibid. 500. 31 Act 1 May 1861. Purd. 1142. See act 9 April
§ 168. & R. 349. 2 P.& W. 431, 1W.&S. 1862, as to the filing of appeals in Delaware
378. 65 Ibid. 363. And see 104 Penn. St. 1. 2 county, Pamph. 347; and act 18 May 1871, as to
Chest. Co. R. 148. Allegheny county. Pamph. 939.
8 7 Phila. 338. 23P.& W. 416. 1 WV. N.C. 415,
10 11 Penn. St. 336. See 17 W. N. OC. 324. 8 12 Penn. St. 363. And see 1 Leg. Gaz. 85
11:1 Ash. 168, 48.4 R.190. 17 Ponn. St.89. 1 W. N.C. 232. 2 .
And see 1 Luz. L. Reg. 497. 104 Penn. St. 1. 368. 1W.N. OC. Wo ea aie ee
13-6 Ponn, St. 194. 1 Ash. 47, “3 Binn. 432, ies
14 1 Ash. 80. 3 2 W. 72,
1 T[bid, 168. 2% 1 W.N. OC. 444.
ACTIONS AT LAW. 121
tary’s office of the proper county, according to law, it shall and may be lawful for
the justice or alderman before whom the judgment was entered, to issue an execu-
tion for the amount thereof, at the instance and request of the appellee, or proceed
by scire facias against the bail! A certificate of the neglect to file an appeal is
not necessary, to enable the justice to issue an execution; he may do s0, at his
own risk, if satisfied that the appeal has not been perfected.?
In Philadelphia, in addition to the entry of bail, the defendant, or some person
acting in his behalf, having knowledge of the facts of the case, is required to file
with the magistrate, an affidavit that the appeal taken is not for the purpose of
delay, but that if the proceedings appealed from are not removed, he or the defend-
ant will be required to pay more money, or receive less, than is justly due; which
affidavit is to be attached to the transcript, by the magistrate, to be filed in the
court to which the appeal is taken. This extends to appeals under the landlord
and tenant law. And itis the duty of the magistrate to inform the appellant that
an affidavit is requisite to perfect his appeal.
The act of 24th June 1885 provides, that in all cases of appeal from the judg-
ment of an alderman or a justice of the peace, the said alderman or justice shall be
entitled to demand and receive, from the appellant, the costs in the case, before the
making and delivery of the transcripts for said appeal; and, if the appellant shall
finally recover judgment in the case appealed, he shall be entitled to receive and
collect from the adverse party the costs so as aforesaid paid on appeal. And that
aldermen and justices of the peace shall have the same right, to demand and
receive the costs as aforesaid, before issuing the transcript of a judgment recovered
before them, for entry in the court of common pleas, or other purpose ; and the
party paying the same shall be entitled to recover them from the party legally
liable to pay the same: Provided, however, That any party to a suit before an
alderman or justice of the peace shall have the right to appeal, and demand and
receive transcripts, without payment of costs as hereinbefore provided, on their
making and filing, with the alderman or justice of the peace, an affidavit that they
are unable, through poverty, to pay said costs.®
In all cases in which judgment shall have been rendered by any justice of the
peace or alderman in this commonwealth for wages of manual labor, before
the defendant shall be entitled to an appeal from the judgment of the justice or
alderman, he, or his agent or attorney, shall make oath or affirmation that the
appeal is not intended for the purpose of delay, but that he believes that injustice
has been done him, which affidavit shall be attached to and sent up with the tran-
script of appeal. And the said defendant shall be required to give good and
sufficient bail or the payment of the debt and costs, to be paid, when finally
adjudged to be due the plaintiff by the court, in all cases for labor.?’ Persons sued
an oath or affirmation that such appeal is not taken
Act 1 April 1823 35. Purd. 1141.
1 or entered for the purpose of delay, but in good
Phila. 517. 2 Leg. Rec. R. 162.
Aet 27 March 1865, Purd. 1141. See 10 Phila.
80.
43W.N. 0. 325.
5 2 Kulp 369. 14 Luz. L. Reg. 435.
® Pamph. 159. See L L. Law Rev. 251.
_ The act 2 March 1868 provides, that in all cases
in which judgments shall be rendered by any
alderman in the city of Lancaster, or justice of the
peace in the county of Lancaster, no appeal shall
be allowed, unless the appellant, his agent or at-
torney, shall make oath or affirmation, to be filed
in the cause, that he has reason to believe that
injustice has been done him, and that the same is
not intended for delay merely: Provided, That
this act shall not apply to parties not residents of
Lancaster county. Pamph. 256. See 1 L. Law Rev.
169. The act 23 February 1870 makes a similar
provision for Dauphin county. Pamph. 221. And
see act 18 May 1871, as to appeals in Allegheny
county. Pamph. 938. The act 26 March 1868 pro-
vides, that no appeal shall be taken or allowed
from any judgment of a justice of peace in the
sounty of Cameron, uvless the party, his or their
agent or attorney, appealing, shall, at the time he
or they shall take such appeal, take and subscribe
faith, and because he or they verily believe that
injustice has been done to him or them (as the
case may be), and that he or they (as the case
may be) has a just and legal defence to the plain-
tiff’s demand, or is entitled to more than the
amount of the judgment rendered by the justice ;
which said oath or affirmation shall ke filed with
the justice and entered upon his docket, and also
annexed to the transcript and filed therewith.
Pamph. 495. This is extended to Venango county
by act 11 March 1879, Pamph. 397; but appears to
be supplied by act 5 April 1870, Pamph. 931. The
act 11 March 1860, is extended to Erie and Colum-
bia counties, by act 23 March 1872. Pamph. 524.
And see act 28 February 1870,as to Luzerne
county. Pamph. 269.
7 Act 20 April 1876. Purd. 2074, See 2
Chest. Co. R. 63. The supreme court have said,
that this is class legislation, and where one man
claims a right that is not common to citizens
generally, every requisite to bring the case
within the act should appear on the docket of
the justice, clearly and not argumentatively.
104 Penn. St. 4.
122 ACTIONS AT LAW
in a representative capacity are not embraced by this act. It is prospective as to
future judgments.’ ;
The act of 1810 provides, that upon any such appeal from justices of the peace,
the cause shall be decided on its facts and merits only; and that no deficiency
of form or substance in the record or proceedings returned, nor any mistake in
‘the form or name of the action, shall prejudice either party in the court to which the
appeal shall be made. an
The costs on appeals hereafter entered from the judgments of the justices of the
peace and aldermen shall abide the event of the suit, and be paid by the unsuc-
cessful party as in other cases: Provided, That if the plaintiff be the appellant,
he shall pay all costs which may accrue on the appeal, if in the event of the
suit, he shall not recover a greater sum or a more favorable judgment than was
rendered by the justice. And provided also, That if the defendant, either on the trial
of the cause before the justice or referees, or before an appeal is taken, shall offer
to give the plaintiff a judgment for the amount which the defendant shall
admit to be due, which offer it shall be the duty of the justice and of the referees
to enter on the record, and if the said plaintiff or his agent shall not accept such offer,
then and in that case, if the defendant shall appeal, the plaintiff shall pay all
the costs which shall accrue on the appeal, if he shall not, in the event of the
suit, recover a greater amount than that for which the defendaut offered to give
a judgment; and in both cases, the defendant’s bill shall be taxed and paid by the
plaintiff, in the same manner as if a judgment had been rendered in court for
the defendant.‘
This act applies to appeals in cases of trespass and trover.5 A plaintiff is enti-
tled to recover full costs, although the amount finally recovered be not so great,
either as the judgment of the justice, or the award of arbitrators out of court, from
each of which the defendant appeals.® So, if the defendant appeal from the judg-
ment of a justice in his favor, for a sum certain, and on the trial there is a verdict
and judgment for him for a less amount, he is, nevertheless, entitled to full costs.’
But if the defendant recover judgment before the justice, for a sum certain, and
the plaintiff appeal, and the award of arbitrators in ‘court be “‘ no cause of action,”
neither party can recover costs.® And where the justice gave judgment for the
defendant for $17.34, from which the plaintiff appealed, who, on a rule of reference
entered by him, obtained an award in his favor for $5, from which the defendant
appealed ; and upon a trial in court, there was a general verdict for the. defend-
ant, it was held, that the defendant was entitled to judgment for the costs which
had accrued prior to the appeal from the judgment of the justice.®
A tender of judgment, in order to exempt the defendant from the payment of
costs on appeal, may be made by the defendant’s agent, in his absence." A tender
made after the appeal is taken, though before the justice has made out his tran-
script of appeal, is too late." But it may be made at any time before the appeal is
taken, though the plaintiff be not present, A tender before the justice of a sum
of money equal to the amount recovered, is not sufficient ; nor is a tender of such
sum, together with the costs accrued.* The record is the only evidence of a tender
of judgment before the justice ;* it is not sufficient that it appear in his certificate
to the transcript."* But if such offer be entered upon the record, it is error to
receive evidence that it was conditional in its terms.”
The whole proceeding in case of appeal shall be certified to the prothonotary of
the proper county, who shall enter the same on his docket, and the suit shall from
1100 Penn, St. 506. 82W.& 8S. 36.
225 Pitts. L. J. 120. ‘ ® 6 Penn. St. 463. And see 22 Ibid. 298, As
8 Purd. 1141, See 5S. & R. 544. 10 Ibid. 121. co what is a more favorable judgment, where tho
12 Ibid. 292, 3 Wh. 419. 2W.131. 4 Ibid. 329. plaintiff is the appellant, see 2 Penn. St. 65. 39
7 Ibid. 48, 180. 4 W.& 8.327. 8 Ibid. 342. 11 thid. lll. 66 Ibid. 162. 1 P. & W. 23. 2 Clark
Penn. St. 147. 13 Ibid. 60. 14 Ibid. 69. 17 W. 24. 3 Ibid. 41.
N.C. 253. A voluntary nonsuit, in acase in which 10 48 Penn. St. 128.
the justice had no jurisdiction, is not a bar to 1 1 Ibid. 188.
another suit. 16 W. N.C. 348. 126 W. 494.
‘ Act 9 April 1833. Purd. 1140. See 1 Wood. 78. 1B ot W. 389,
a ge an 4 4 Wh. 78
31 Penn. St. 424, 16 29g
6 7 W. 235. 5 Ibid. 508. 16 eo ieee Bt. 86.
1 7W.&S.313. 4W 389. ave 15 Ibid. 41.
ACTIONS AT LAW. 123
thence take grade with, and be subject to the same rules as uther actions, when the
parties are considered to be in court ; and the costs accrued before the justice shall
await the event of the suit. After the appeal is filed, the proceedings in court
are de novo as to the declaration, pleadings and evidence; the cause of action
must, however, continue the same ;? and nothing can be recovered in court which
could not have been recovered before the justice, except the intermediate interest.’
On appeal, the defendant cannot defalcate a claim beyond the jurisdiction of the
justice.‘ The form of action may be changed on appeal, provided the cause of
action remain the same.® A plaintiff cannot discontinue his own appeal, so as to
authorize him to proceed on the original judgment. A defendant cannot take both
an appeal and certiorari ;* but he may abandon his appeal, before filing the tran-
script, and resort to his remedy by certiorart.®
V. OF THE CERTIORARI.
The judges of the courts of common pleas, within their respective counties, shall
have power to issue writs of certiorari to justices of the peace, and other inferior
courts, not of record; and to cause their proceeding to be brought before them,
and right and*justice to be done.® But no writ of certiorar? issued by or out of the
supreme court to any justice of the peace, in any civil suit or action, shall be
available to remove the proceedings had before such justice.” A certiorari is a
writ of error in everything but form." It may issue from the common pleas, when-
ever a new jurisdiction is conferred upon magistrates, and the proceeding is
summary." But the statute does not oust the jurisdiction of the supreme court in
the proceedings of justices under the landlord and tenant act ; nor in proceedings
to recover possession by a purchaser at sheriff's sale; nor in a prosecution for
a penalty under the road laws.% But a proceeding under the stray law is within
the jurisdiction.’ And so is an action before the mayor of Philadelphia, to recover a
penalty for a breach of ordinance. \
Hither party shall have the privilege of removing the cause, by writ of certiorari,
from before any justice : whose duty it shall be to certify the whole proceeding had
before him, hy sending the original precepts, a copy of the judgment, and execu-
tion or executions, if any be issued ; but not the evidence.* The court may permit
the justice to amend his transcript.” No special allocatur is required for the main-
tenance of such writ. But to operate as a supersedeas, the party suing it out,
must give bail as on a writ of error, which may be taken by the prothonotary.”
The party suing out the writ is also required to make oath or affirmation, that it
is not for the purpose of delay, but that in his opinion the cause of action was not
cognisable before a justice, or that the proceedings proposed to be removed are, to
the best of his knowledge, unjust and illegal, and if not removed, will oblige him
to pay more money, or to receive less from his opponent, than is justly due; a
copy of which affidavit is to be filed in the prothonotary’s office.* The prothonotary ,
is authorized to administer the oath or affirmation, with the same effect as if made
before a judge.* The affidavit and recognisance may be made and entered into by
1 Act 20 March 1810 3 4. Purd. 1140. 19 1 Ash. 64. 6] Penn. St. 491.
21 Binn. 219. 3 Ibid. 45. 20 1 Chest. Co. R. 137. But the constable will
108. & R. 227. Seel W. &S. 301. not be permitted to amend his return to the sum-
4 48 Penn. St. 456. mons. 2 Kulp 270.
52W.14. 1R. 370. 21 Act 26 April 1855 32. Pamph. 304. This act
6 10 Penn. St. 70. 3 W. 46. is constitutional. 67 Penn. St. 149. A special
7 1 Brewst. 406. allocatur is necessary for the review of a justice’s
8 2 Chest. Co. R. 497. judgment for a fine imposed by a municipal ordi-
5 Const. art. V. 2 10. nance. 1 Kulp 454. But see 2 Del. Co. R. 469,
10 Act 20 March 18103 24. Purd. 793. where it was held, that the act of 1855 applies to
11R, 321. 3P.& W. 24. 9 Penn. St. 216. all cases of civil proceeding before a justice.
12-1 Brewst. 411. 22 2 Phila. 68-9. 6 L. Bar 50. Petersdorff on
3 4 Binn. 185. 38. & BR. 95. Bail 434. It was a eupersedeas at common law.
14 100 Peun. St. 429, 43 Penn. St. 372. And in landlord and tenant
1 76 Ibid. 465. cases, in Philadelphia, a certiorari, with bail, is
6 2R. 20. made a supersedeas by act 24 March 1865. Purd.
" 5 Ibid. 119. 1169,
18 Act 20 March 1810 $22. Purd. 793. Notice 2 Act 20 March 1810 3 21. Purd, 794.
to the opposite party of the issuing of the certio- 4 Act 3 February 1817. Ibid. 795.
sari is not requisite. 16 W. N.C. 495.
124 ACTIONS AT LAW.
the party’s agent or attorney.! And in case of a corporation, the affidavit must be
made by the president or other chief officer thereof, or in his absence, by the
cashier, treasurer or secretary? This extends to all corporations <* and is not
repealed by the act of 1832.4 The affidavit must substantially follow the words
of the act.5 : :
The act of 1810 further provides, that no judgment of a justice shall be set aside
in pursuance of a writ of certiorari, unless the same is issued within twenty days
after judgment was rendered, and served within five days thereafler; and no exe-
cution shall be set aside, in pursuance of the writ aforesaid, unless the said writ is
issued and served within twenty days after the execution issued.® If this pro-
vision be not observed, the court will not look into the judgment, even if it do not
appear from the record that the summons was served, if, within twenty days, the
defendant had knowledge of the proceedings, and applied to have the judgment
opened." If, however, it be apparent on the face of the record, that the justice
had no jurisdiction, or that the summons was not served in the manner directed by
the act of 1810, and the defendant did not appear, the court will reverse the pro-
ceedings, on certiorari, notwithstanding more than twenty days may have elapsed
before the issuing of the writ ;* where there is no legal service of the process on
the defendant, he is not in court, and all the subsequent proceedings are erroneous
and void® But, in such case, the party must satisfy the court that his application
was made within twenty days after the fact of the entry of the judgment came
to his knowledge." The fact that notice was not given may be proved by parol.!
A judgment obtained by any trick or fraud ought to be reversed, if the certiorari
be taken out within a reasonable time after it is discovered.”
The act further provides, that the proceedings of a justice of the peace shall not
be set aside or reversed, on certiorari, for want of formality in the same, if it shall
appear on the face thereof, that the defendant confessed a judgment for any sum
within the jurisdiction of a justice of the peace, or that a precept issued in the
name of the commonwealth of Pennsylvania, requiring the defendant to appear
before the justice, on some day certain, or directing the constable to bring the
defendant or defendants forthwith before him, agreeable to the provisions and
directions contained in the act, and that the said constable, having served the said
precept, judgment was rendered, on the day fixed in the precept, or on some other
day to which the cause was postponed by the justice, with the knowledge of the
parties ; and no execution issued by a justice shall be set aside for informality, if
it shall appear on the face of the same, that it issucd in the name of the common-
wealth of Pennsylvania, after the expiration of the proper period of time, and for
the sum for which judgment had been rendered, together with interest thereon,
and costs, and a day mentioned on which return is to be made by the constable, and
that the cause of action shall have been cognisable before a justice of the peace.
And the judgment of the court of common pleas shall be final on all proceed-
ings removed as aforesaid, by the said court, and no writ of error shall issue
thereon.¥
On the hearing of a certiorari to a justice, every reasonable presumption will be
made in favor of his proceedings, consistent with the record.* Merely formal
errors will be disregarded.'® If the proceedings appear on the face of the transcript
2. Purd. 791.
4, Ibid.
101 Ash. 185, 1 Phila, 439,
Purd. 709, note a,
ll 19 Penn. St. 495.
12 Tbid. 3 Phila. 258.
+ 27 March 1833 ; 1 Kalp 341.
1 Ao
2 Act 22 March 1817
38S. & BR. 517.
414 Penn. St. 442.
5 See 2 Bro. 217. 11. & H. Pr. 3891. 3 Bright.
Dig. 3009, pl. 25. For form of affidavit, see Gray-
don’s Forms 38,
6 Purd. 794. This does not apply to an action,
fora penalty. 128. & R. 53.
71 Ash. 135,
8 89 Penn. St. 460. And see 1 L. Law Rev. 141.
9 19 Penn. St. 495. 5 Clark 350. 1 Pitts. 271.
21 Leg. Int. 340. 29 Ibid 12. 8 Phila. 636. 10
Thid. 482. 2 Luz. L. Obs. 28. 2 Luz. L. Reg.
105. 2 Pears. 360. Purd. 709, note a. In one
case a magistrate’s judgment was reversed, for
want of jurisdiction, after a lapse of ten years.
15 W.N. C. 30.
18 Act 20 March 1810 3 22. Purd. 793, See 2
Wood. 104. 107 Penn. St. 346. The act of
1879, enlarging the jurisdiction of justices to
$300, does not affect the finality of the judgment,
on certiorari, 3 Penny. 85. 106 Penn. St. 458.
M2 Clark 169. 10 UL. Bar 75. 1 Kulp 272,
Thid. 493, 10 Luz. L. Reg.76. And see 4 Y.
373. 60 Penn. St. 107. 1 Ash. 153. Ibid. 221.
In an action for the breach of a penal ordinance,
the transcript must set forth the offence and ordi-
nance violated with sufficient clearness and pre
cision, 1 L. Law Rev. 3. And see 1 Wood. 408
1) 2 Ash. 120, 2 Kulp 317.
\
ACTIONS AT LAW. 125
to be regular, and that he has acted within the sphere of his jurisdiction, parol
evidence will not, in general, be admitted! But the court may, to prevent
injustice, make inquiry into the evidence given before the magistrate? To estab-
lish corruption or partiality, or the refusal to hear testimony, parol evidence is
necessarily admissible; and there may be cases in which the absence of jurisdiction
can be established in no other way; as, where one justice undertakes to re-examine
what has already been determined by another; otherwise, the court cannot go out
of the record.’ But the parol evidence must relate to the conduct of the justice,
not to that of a party. The court will notice a substantial and fatal error in the
proceedings, although the counsel have omitted to make it a special exception,
when it is deemed essential for the purposes of justice. But they have no power
to direct an issue to try disputed facts arising on a certiorari® Matters dehors the
record must be brought before the court by deposition, not by ex parte affidavit."
The provision that the judgment of the common pleas shall be final, only applies
to a judgment on a certiorari issued under the act of 1810; where a subsequent
act confers jurisdition on justices of the peace, to proceed in a different manner
from that directed in that act, the judgment of the common pleas on certiorari,
may be re-examined by the supreme court.® The act further directs that the court
shall, at the term to which the proceedings of the justices of the peace are return-
able, in pursuance of writs of certiorari, determine and decide thereon.® This
clause is merely directory; it has never been thought that an omission to decide
upon a certiorart at the first term, ousted the jurisdiction of the court.
In all cases where the proceedings of a justice of the peace shall be removed by
certiorari, at the instance of the plaintiff, and the same be set aside by the court,
and on the second trial being had, before the same or any other justice of the peace,
if judgment shall not be obtained for a sum equal to, or greater than the original
judgment, which was set aside by the court, he shall pay all costs accrued on the
second trial before the justice of the peace, as well as those which accrued at
the court before whom the proceedings had been set aside, including any fees
which the defendant may have given any attorney, not exceeding four dollars, in
such trial, together with fifty cents per day to the said defendant, while attending
on the said court in defence of the proceedings of the said justice of the peace;
and in cases where the proceedings of any justice of the peace shall be removed
at the instance of the defendant, and be set aside by the court, and it shall appear
that he attended the trial before the justice, or had legal notice to attend the same,
and on a final trial being had as aforesaid, the plaintiff shall obtain judgment for a
sum equal to or greater than the original judgment, which was set aside by the
court, he shall pay all costs accrued on the second trial before the justice of
the peace, as well as those which accrued at the court before whom the proceedings
have been set aside, including any fees, which the plaintiff may have given to any
attorney, not exceeding four dollars, to defend the proceedings of the justice,
together with fifty cents per day while attending at court on the same; which cost
shall be recovered before any justice of the peace in the same manner as sums
of similar amount are recoverable ; and in such cases, the legal stay of execution
shall be counted from the date of the original judgment rendered by the justice
of the peace?
This section has no application to the reversal of an execution on certiorart.s
Where the certiorari is non-prossed, the record must be remitted to the justice for
further proceedings ;® but on affirmance, execution issues out of the court, without
a remittitur ;“ so also, on a reversal, the record is not remitted. It is the better
11 Ash. 51. Ibid. 64. 1 Wood. 15. Ibid. 306, 6 10 W. 53.
Thid, 354. 74 W.N.C.14. 1 Wood. 291.
? 5 Binn. 29. 1 Wood. 6. Ibid. 291. Purd. 708, 8 23 Penn. St. 521. 25 Ibid. 134. And see 4
note 6. See 2 Dall. 114, And it may be shown Binn. 185. 28. &R.112. 1R.317. 3 Wh.12,
by parol that the justice gave judgment by default, 1 W.532. 2 W.N. C. 252.
without hearing any evidence. 3 L. Law Rev.178. _§ Act 20 March 1810 25. Purd. 794.
8 1 Ash. 215, 1 Pitts. 271. 3 Ibid. 237. 8 1 65 Penn. St. 34.
Phila, 342. 51 Penn. St. 48. 1 Chest. Co. R.467. 1 Act 20 March 1810 3 25. Purd. 794.
2 Luz. L, Reg. 111. 31 Pitts. L.J. 81. 29 Leg. 12 4 W. 450.
Tot. 126. 1 Wood. 15. Ibid. 79. Ibid. 291. B3P.& W. 21. 3 Luz L. Reg. 108. 4 Ibid.
* 60 Penn. St.107. 51 Ibid. 48. And see 1 114.
Pears, 27, 1 Chest. Co. R. 203. 141 Dall. 410. 25 Penn. St. 350. 1 Chest. Co.
5 2 Pears. 265, 1 Wood. 6, 29 Leg. Int. 12. R. 100.
And see 1 Ash. 152. 29 Leg. Int. 12. 16 15 Phila, 308.
126 ACTIONS AT LAW.
opinion, that on the reversal of a justice’s judgment, on certtorart, no costs are
recoverable ;! though there are respectable authorities to the contrary.’
VI. PROCEEDINGS SUBSEQUENT TO THE JUDGMENT.
1. Of the Stay of Execution.
In all cases where the defendant is a freeholder, or enters the bail required b
the act of 1845, and the judgment rendered shall be above five dollars and thirty-
three cents, and not exceeding twenty dollars, there shall be a stay of execution
for three months ; and where the judgment shall be above twenty dollars and not
exceeding sixty dollars, there shall be a stay of six months; and where the judg.
ment shall be above sixty dollars and not exceeding three hundred dollars, there
shall be a stay of execution for nine months.? Where a judgment is confessed for
a sum exceeding one hundred dollars, the stay of execution is for one year.
A freeholder is entitled to the stay of execution allowed by the statute, without
giving bail. He must show a freehold not merely worth the amount of the judg.
ment, or more than the liens upon it, but clear of all incumbrances.’ But he need
not show title, as in ejectment; possession under color of title is, in general, all
that has been required.® If the freehold be within the jurisdiction of the court, the
defendant need only show its existence and value; it then rests on the plaintiff,
if he object, to show an incumbrance; but if the freehold be in another county,
the defendant must not only show its existence and value, but must produce
evidence, by the usual certificates of search, of its being clear of incumbrances,!
plea of freehold being entered, the plaintiff may move to dismiss it for insuff-
ciency.® But one of several defendants, who has a sufficient freehold, is entitled to
the stay, which will avail his co-defendants.®
Unless the defendant plead his freehold or enter bail, the plaintiff is entitled to
immediate execution on his judgment. But if the defendant subsequently appeal
and plead his freehold, it is the duty of the justice to supersede the execution, on
payment of the costs which have accrued on the execution.” After a- plea of free-
hold, execution cannot issue, without calling on the defendant to justify." Where
a judgment by default is opened, and a rehearing granted, if the former judgment
be confirmed, the stay of execution runs from the day on which the last judg-
ment was entered. And if any executor or administrator shall declare before
the justice, after judgment against him, that he has not sufficient assets to satisfy
such judgment, it is made the duty of the justice forthwith to transmit the record
of his judgment to the prothonotary of the court of common pleas, to be entered on
his docket, and the said court is required to adjudge and decree thereon, and to
appoint auditors to ascertain and apportion the assets, as in other cases!
The bail in all cases where bail is now required for the stay of execution, shall
be bail absolute, with one or more sufficient sureties, in double the amount of the
debt or damages, interest and costs recovered, conditioned for the payment thereof,
in the event that the defendant fail to pay the same at the expiration of the stay
of execution.* The defendant is entitled to enter bail for stay of execution, after
the lapse of twenty days, if an execution have not actually issued.S But it is too
late to enter bail for stay, after the money has been made on an execution, though
the twenty days have not elapsed.* Bail for stay of execution cannot be stricken
12 W.N. 0.16. 2 Chest. Co. R. 488. Ibid. Pr. 3 1036.
489. 14 Luz. L. Reg. 515. Bartram v. Atkinson, 6&1. & H. Pr. @ 235.
Com. Pleas, Phila. 1858. And see 5 Binn. 204, T Ibid. 2M, 342.
9 L. Bar 185. 1 Wood. 140. This is the editor's 8 2M. 342. 1 Phila. 204. 1 T. & H. Pr. g 1036,
opinion, though the contrary decisions are cited, 9 65 Penn. St. 85. :
See 2 Chest. Co. R. 488.
. 10 Phila. 506. 2 Kulp 50. And see15 Phila,
308.
8 Act 24 June 1885. Purd. 1142, This act
does not apply to judgments obtained for wages
of manual labor.
* Act 20 March 1810 3 14. Purd.1127, It seems,
that the costs may be added to the amount for
which judgment is rendered, in regulating the
duration of the stay of execution. 2 Clark 328.
§ 6 Binn. 253. Seel W.N.C.20. 17. & H.
10 1 Ash, 407,
1 2W.N.C. 488; contra, 2 M. 347.
12 Com. Pleas, Phila. 1815.
8 Act 20 March 1810 34. Purd, 1141.
M4 Act 20 March 1845, Ibid. 1143.
18 2 Binn. 195. And see 128. & R. 24,
16 7 W. 337. If bail be entered within the twenty
days, but after execution issued, the defendaat
anes py the costs of the execution. 24 Pitts, L
ACTIONS AT LAW. 127
off, without notice to the defendant.! If the bail be compelled to pay the amount
of the judgment, the act of 1829 provides, that it shall remain for his use, and
may be prosecuted in the name of the plaintiff for the recovery of the amount? ~
In certain cases, no stay of execution is allowed; thus, there can be no stay of
execution on any judgment for one hundred dollars or less, if recovered for wages
of manual labor ;* nor where the judgment is against the defendant as bail for
stay of execution on a former judgment.‘ So, there can be no stay of execution in
an action of debt on a judgment of another state;® nor in favor of a garnishee
in attachment. Nor in an action at the suit of the commonwealth ; and it seems,
that corporations are not entitled to enter bail for stay of execution.®
2. Of the Transcript to bind Real Estate.
The prothonotaries of the respective counties shall enter on their dockets tran-
scripts of judgments obtained before justices of the peace of their proper counties,
without the agency of an attorney, for the fee of fifty cents, which transcripts the
justices shall deliver to any person who may apply for the same, and which judg-
ments, from the time of such entries on the prothonotary’s docket, shall bind the
real estate of the defendants; but no fierd facias shall be issued by any prothono-
tary, until a certificate shall be first produced to him from the justice before whom
the original judgment was entered, stating therein, that an execution had issued to the
proper constable, as directed by this act, and a return thereon that no goods could
be found sufficient to satisfy said demand; and any justice issuing an execution on
a judgment removed as aforesaid, shall, on the plaintiff producing a receipt for the
delivery of such transcript to the prothonotary of the county, to be entered of
record, tax fifty cents upon such execution, for the prothonotary’s fees as aforesaid.
And no judgment, whether obtained before a justice, or in any court of record
within this commonwealth, shall deprive any person of his or her right as a free-
holder longer or for any greater time than such judgment shall remain unsatisfied,
any law, usage or custom, to the contrary notwithstanding?
Under this act, where the defendant pleads his freehold in stay of execution, the
plaintiff can secure himself, by entering up his judgmevt in the prothonotary’s
office, where it immediately becomes a lien upon the defendant’s lands within the
county. Such transcript is, as regards real estate, virtually a judgment of
the court; and may be so recited in a seire facias.” The court has no power, in
general, to strike off such transcript,” or to open the judgment, and let the defend-
ant into a defence.“ But the court has a discretion to stay an execution issued
thereon, until further order. And where the judgment has been reversed, on cer-
tiorari, the court may strike off the transcript.® So, also, where the judgment
appears, on the face of the transcript, to have been obtained without service of
process.” But the court will not strike off an old judgment, so entered; the plain-
tiff will be put to his scire factas.% If, however, the transcript was filed more than
nineteen years after the judgment was rendered, and the justice was not called,
nor the docket produced, and there was nothing to show whether an execution had
ever been issued by the justice, the jury may infer payment from circumstances
and lapse of time.4® Notwithstanding the filing of a transcript, the record remains
before the justice for further proceedings.” The transcript is not evidence to show
121 Pitts. L. J. 76.
2 Act 23 April 1829. Purd. 1143.
3 Act 14 May 1874. Ibid. 830.
2 Clark 357.
9 Phila. 559. 10 L. Bar 152.
12 W. N.C. 238.
& 8. 170,
131258. & R. 72.
And see 1 1 Chest. Co. R. 173.
W.N. C. 510. 1419 Penn St. 495. 52 Ibid. 431. 1W.N.C.
* Act 25 April 1850 3 28. Purd. 830. 159. See 1 P.& W.20. 3 Ibid. 98. 15 W.N,
52 Am. L, Reg. 446. C.171. 10 Leg. Int. 46. 7 Phila. 407. 24 Pitts.
61 Phila. 284. L. J. 9
9.
15 38 Leg. Int. 262. The proper practice is, to
take an appeal or certiorari. 41 Ibid. 338,
16 2W. N.C. 274. 5
17 13 Phila.550. See also 7 Leg. Gaz.174. And
14 Ibid. 421.
_81 Pears. 113,
9 Act 20 March 1810 310. Purd. 1143, The
party applying for a transcript must pay all the
costs due in the cause, unless he make affidavit
of his inability to pay the same. Act 24 June
1885. Purd. 1143. See act 9 May 1889. Purd.
1144, as to execution. :
101 Ash, 408.
ugSs, & R. 479.
23P,& W.98. 1 Ibid. 20. 3. W. 381. 2 W.
under the act of 1885, the court may strike off
the judgment for error apparent on the face of the
record. 43 Leg. Int. 26.
18 1 Pears. 79. And see 12 W. N. C. 238.
19 12 Penn, St. 312.
2 ] Binn. 881. 12S. & R. 72. 19 Penn. St. 498
128 ACTIONS AT LAW.
a former recovery. Nor does it create a lien, if an appeal be entered within the
twenty days? And when judgment has been entered on a justice's transcript, no
other judgment can be entered by transcript from the same record* An attachment
execution may issue on such judgment.‘ ; ¢
To authorize the prothonotary to issue a i. fa. on the judgment, a certificate is un-
necessary, if the transcript show that an execution has been issued and returned ‘‘ no
goods.’’® A scire facias may issue, without a certificate; and ona judgment on the
scire facias, execution may issue from the common pleas.® A fiert ‘ facias may be
issued against personal property upon a justice's transcript filed by virtue of the act
24th June 1885, which provides that the judgment in the common pleas entered
thereon, shall have all the force and effect of a judgment originally obtained in the
court of common pleas. On filing a transcript in the common pleas, in addition to
the fee of fifty cents, there is a state tax of twenty-five cents, which is to be paid by
the plaintiff, without recourse to the defendant."
3. Of the Execution.
The justice is authorized by the act of 1810, to receive the amount of the judgment,
and to pay the same over to the plaintiff, or his agent, when required; and his omis-
sion to do so is a misdemeanor in office. Butif the amount of the judgment is not
paid to the justice as aforesaid, he is required to grant execution, if required by the
plaintiff or his agent, thereupon, if fora sum not exceeding five dollars and thirty-
three cents, forthwith, and for any further sum, after the time limited for the stay of
the same; which execution shall be directed to the constable of the ward, district or
township, where the defendant resides, or the next constable most convenient to the
defendant; commanding him to levy the debt or demand, and costs, on the defend-
ant’s goods and chattels, and by virtue thereof, shall within the space of twenty days
next following, expose the same to sale, by public vendue, having given due notice
of the same, by at least three advertisements, put up at the most public places in his
township, ward or district, returning the overplus, if any, to the defendant: Pro-
vided, That executions against executors or administrators shall only be for the assets
of the deceased.®
The justice is to issue execution, if required by the plaintiff or his agent; he has no
right to do so of his own motion; he cannot act as the plaintiff's agent in the collec-
tion of debts, and take jurisdiction of suits for their enforcement; to do so amounts
to a misdemeanor in office."° Suit cannot be brought upon a promissory note, before
a justice of the peace to whom it has been indorsed for collection. The execution is
to be directed to the constable of the ward, district or township where the defendant
resides, or to the next constable most convenient to the defendant. Under this
clause, it is the universal practice for justices to issue their executions to any constable
within the county ;” in general, the justice is to judge who is the constable most con-
venient to the defendant.% But he cannot compel one who is, not the constable of
the proper ward, and clearly not the constable most convenient to the defendant, to
execute his process.* An execution directed to ‘‘ any constable of the county,” is not
void; it may be executed by the proper officer, at his own peril.® By statute, the
justice is authorized to indorse on the execution the fees for the return thereof, as
well as for issuing the same.'®
. 138. & R. 54. not exceeding sixty dollars, 75 cents; if exceed-
7 W. 540. ing sixty and not exceeding one hundred dollars,
3 3 Gr. 259. I dollar; and a like amount on each one hun-
sen aaa arr aoe hg 83. 2 Clark dred up to three hundred.”
. See id. a Me CO. 237, ® Act 20 March 1810312. Purd. 1144.
5 6W. 4&8. 343. Act 24 June 1885. Purd. 10 148. & R, 158, é si
1144. By the act 9 May 1889, a certificate is not
necessary where the judgment is for $100.
6 3 W. 381.
T Purd. 1143, note d.
8 Act 20 March 1810 311. Purd. 1144, By
the fee-bill of 23 May 1893, P. L. 117, the magis-
trates of Philadelphia and all justices are enti-
tled to the following fees for this service, viz.:
“receiving the amount of a judgment and pay-
ing the same over, if not exceeding ten dollars,
25 cents; if exceeding ten and not exceeding
forty dollars, 50 cents; if exceeding forty and
149 Mich. 505. In Wistar v. Conroy, at
June Term 1869, the court of common pleas of.
Philadelphia, reversed the decision of an alder-
man, in a landlord and tenant case, on the
ground that the magistrate had signed the
notice to quit, as the plaintiff's agent.
13°78. & R. 354.
18-13 Ibid. 336.
14 106 Penn. St. 643.
15 1 Ash, 218,
18 Act 23 April 1829 22. Purd. 1145,
ACTIONS AT LAW. 129
It is provided by act of assembly, that no execution shall be issued on a judg-
ment rendered before a justice of the peace or alderman, after five years from the
rendition of such judgment, unless the same shall have been revived by sctre facius
or amicable confession! The power of issuing a setre facias is appurtenant to’
that of issuing executions, and included in it. An execution issued more than five
years from the rendition of the judgment, without a scire facias, is irregular?
But no person except the defendant can take advantage of an irregularity in the
issuing of an execution. If an appeal have been taken, the justice may issue
execution after the return-day, if satisfied that the appeal has not been perfected.®
A misrecital in the body of the execution does not render it void; nor will the
constable be a trespasser in executing it® It is not requisite that the execution
should mention a special return-day ; the law makes it returnable within twenty
days from its date.” A justice has power to supersede his execution, and such
supersedeas will exonerate the constable,® and release the surety in a bond for the
forthcoming of the goods levied on, whether the full costs be paid or not.
The constable, on receipt of an execution, is bound to levy on and sell, by public
vendue, sufficient goods and chattels of the defendant to satisfy the demand of his
writ.° If he sell any portion of the goods without levy or advertisement, he is
liable in damages." And a sale to the plaintiff, no person but the constable being
present, is illegal and void." If there be any overplus, the statute requires the
constable to return it to the defendant. But his safest course is, to pay the overplus
to the justice, who, by a subsequent act, is bound to receive it, and pay it over to
the defendant, “without any fee for making such payment.”
No execution issued upon a judgment on demand arising upon contract express
or implied, shall contain a clause authorizing the arrest or imprisonment of the
person of the defendant, unless it be shown by affidavit, to the satisfaction of
the justice, either that such judgment was for the recovery of money collected by
a public officer, or for official misconduct,” And in cases of tort cognisable
before a justice, such clause may be inserted in the execution. But though the
demand sound in tort, yet if the record show a claim on contract, an execution
against the body is erroneous.® Execution may issue against the body, on a judg-
ment in a penal action, unless the statute direct the penalty to be recovered “as
debts of like amount are by law-recoverable.’"6 In cases where it is allowed, the
act provides that the execution shall command the constable, for want of sufficient
distress, to take the body of the defendant into custody ; and him or her convey to
the common jail of the county ; and the sheriff or keeper of such jail is thereby
directed to receive the person or persons so taken in execution, and him, her or
them safely keep, until the sum recovered, and interest thercon accrued from the
date of the judgment, together with costs, be fully paid; and in default of such
keeping, to be liable to answer the damage to the party injured, as is by law pro-
vided in case of escapes.”
In an action of debt for an escape on final process, the plaintiff is entitled to
recover his whole debt and costs ;* and the insolvency of the prisoner is no defence.
If the jailer permit a prisoner to escape, and the sheriff be made responsible, the
jailer is liable even, though he acted in good faith, and under the advice of counsel ;”
and so are the jailer’s sureties,”
1 Act 5 May 1854, Purd. 1145, An attachment-
execution may issue without a secire facias. 5
Penn. St. 115. 1 Chest. Co. R. 239.
2 § Binn. 58.
3 3 Gr. 259. And see 2 Clark 401.
4 1 Pears, 36.
5 7 Phila. 517.
6 2 W. 424,
’ 1 Ash. 58. But as a contrary decision was
made by Judge Franklin, in the court of common
pleas of Lancaster, it is customary to insert a
special return-day in the writ.
81P.& W. 61,
93W.& S. 447.
10 No express authority is given here, or else-
where, to the constable to depute any person to
serve an execution ; and if he were so to deputize
another, he, the constable, would be “liable to
answer the damages to the party injured,” if the
injury had been caused by the neglect or miscon-
duct of the person whom he had deputized.
11 1 Penn. St. 238.
12 15 Ibid. 90.
13 Act 28 March 1820 3 2. Purd 1145.
14 Act 12 July 1842 3 23. Ibid.
16 3 Leg. Gaz. 260.
16 Purd.1130,notep. 7 Leg. Gaz. 293. And gee
1 Dall. 135. 4 Y. 237, 240.
17 Act 20 March 1810 312. Purd. 1145
1 3Y.17. 4 Ibid. 47. 5 W. 141.
1297S. & R. 273. 59 Penn. St. 320.
20 5 W. 141.
219 Penn. St. 451,
130 ACTIONS AT LAW.
4, Liability of the Constable.
On the delivery of an execution to any constable, an account shall be stated in
the docket of the justice, and also on the back of the execution, of the debt,
interest and costs; from which the said constable shall not be discharged, but
by producing to the justice, on or before the return-day of the execution, the
receipt of the plaintiff, or such other return as may be sufficient in law.!
The first act to charge the constable is the statement on the docket of the debt,
interest and costs? It will frequently happen, that after the issue, and before “the
return-day of the execution,” while that process is in the hands of the constable,
the defendant will call at the office to make payment. The account being “ stated
in the docket,” the justice will have nothing to do but turn to the case, ascertain
the exact amount, and, if required, satisfy the defendant as to the several items
of which it is made up. Whenever the account is paid to the justice, let him, before
he closes his docket, write at the foot of the case, ‘Money paid into office.”
‘Received satisfaction.” When he pays the plaintiff, or his agent, he should
require him to subscribe his name under the above receipt.
It is only by a strict compliance with the directions of the statute that the
constable can be discharged from his liability to pay ‘the debt, interest and costs,”
on the back of the execution. He must, “‘ on or before the return-day of the exe-
cution,” which day should always be indorsed on the execution, produce to the
justice “ the receipt of the plaintiff, or make such other return as may be sufficient -
in law.” He may indorse on the execution, “no goods.” But if the constable
shall make ‘‘a false return,” a return unfounded in fact,—for example, if he should
return ‘no goods,” and the plaintiff subsequently prove that there were sufficient
goods on which the constable might have levied, in such a case, or any similar
case of neglect or misconduct, the constable and his bail would be liable to the
plaintiff for the “debt, interest and costs,” on the execution, on which he had made
such “ false return.”
The mere omission to return the execution within twenty days will not render
the constable liable, if he has sufficient cause for the delay.’ Of the sufficiency
of the return, the justice must judge in the first instance, but his decision is subject
to review ; and the return must be in writing.*
In cise of a false return, or in case the constable does not produce the plaintiff's
receipt, on the return-day, or make such other return as may be deemed sufficient
by the justice, he shall issue a summons, directed for service to a constable, or #o
some other fit person who shall consent to serve the same, and having so consented,
by accepting of such process, shall be bound to execute the same, under a penaly
of twenty dollars, to Le recovered as other fines are recoverable by this act; bat
should not a constable or other fit person conveniently be found to serve the process
as aforesaid, the justice shall direct it to a supervisor of the highways of the town-
ship, ward or district where such constable resides, whose duty it shall be to serve
the same under the penalty aforesaid—commanding the constable to appear before
him on such day as shall be mentioned in the said summons, not exceeding eight
days from the date thereof, and then and there show cause why an execution should
not issue against him for the amount of the first above-mentioned execution; and
if the said constable either neglects to appear on the day mentioned in such sum-
mons, or does not show sufficient cause why the execution should not issue against
him, then the justice shall enter judgment against such constable for the amount
of the first above-mentioned execution, together with costs; on which judgment
there shall be no stay of execution; and upon application of the plaintiff or his agent,
the said justice shall issue an execution against the constable for the amount of
such judgment, which execution may be directed to any constable of the county,
or other fit person accepting thereof, or to a supervisor, as aforesaid, whose duty
it shall be to execute the same: Provided always, That nothing in this act con-
1 Aot 20 March 1810 312. Purd. 1145, 56 W. & S.534. 17 W. N.C. 487. See 1 Ash.
2 The account may be stated in this manner: 160.
Debt; oe ns. we we ws SEOST 4 5 Ibid. 457. 8 W. 220. 4 Whart. 56. And see
Interest, . . . 2» ~ 2.70 1 Ash. 160. 1M. 210. 2R.199.
Costs, . . «2... 6158+ $50.65,
ACTIONS AT LAW. 131
tained shall in any manner impair or alter the proceeding as heretofore established
with regard to insolvent debtors, and their discharge on a full surrender of their
property.”
Tn an action against a constable for not returning an execution in due time, it is
not competent for him to prove that the defendant had no property ;? but it is a
good defence, that the judgment was paid before the execution was issued. The
constable may appeal from the judgment against him ;* and so may the plaintiff.®
A previous execution by the justice is not necessary to authorize the issuing of
an execution upon a transcript of the judgment filed in the common pleas.
Where any constable shall refuse or neglect to pay over to the defendant or
defendants, his or their agent or legal representatives, the overplus money which he
or his deputy may have made or received upon any execution or executions, then
and in such case, the party or parties aggrieved may apply to the alderman or justice
of the peace who issued the process, who shall thereupon proceed against such
constable in the manner prescribed by the 12th section of the act to which this is a
supplement, in cases where the constable makes a false return or neglects to return
the execution ; and if, upon such proceedings, the justice shall receive the overplus
money, or if it shall be voluntarily paid to him at any time by the constable, he
shall, in either case, pay over the same to the defendant or defendants, or his or
their agent or legal representatives, without any fee for making such payment.”
5. Docket-entries and Transcripts.
All the proceedings had before a justice shall be entered at large by him ina
docket or book to be kept by him for that purpose, in which he shall state the kind
of evidence upon which the plaintiff’s demand may be founded, whether upon bond,
note, penal or single bill, writing obligatory, book-debt, damages on assumption, or
whatever it. may be; and the whole proceeding, in case of appeal, shall be certified
to the prothonotary of the proper county.®
The docket of a justice of the peace is the best evidence to show the cause
of action before him; and parol proof is inadmissible, to contradict or vary it.®
As justices of peace have not jurisdiction in al cases of contract, it ought to
appear, from their docket-entry, what is the nature of the contract upon which the
action is founded ; If it do not appear from the record that the justice had juris-
diction, the judgment, on certiorart, will be reversed. The docket is no record ;4
but it has the conclusiveness of one; and parol evidence is inadmissible to
contradict or vary it.* It can only be proved by a sworn copy.'4
The magistrate is not bound to enter on his docket the evidence on which his
judgment is founded; it will be presumed that it was on legal proof.® He need
only state the demand and the kind of evidence produced to support the claim,
whether upon bond, note, penal or single bill, writing obligatory, book-debt, dam-
ages on assumption, or whatever it may be, so as to enable the court to ascertain
the grounds of the controversy, and his decision thereon. But where a suit
before a justice is terminated by any act or agreement of the parties, which
amounts, directly or indirectly, to a discontinuance of the action, it is part of the
official duty of the justice to enter such act or agreement upon his docket, and
the docket-entry is evidence of the same.” The record must set forth the plaintiff’s
cause of action so as to show the jurisdiction, and be a bar to another suit. If the
plaintiff sues as a public officer, the record must show the character of the services
1 Act 20 March 1810 3 12, Purd. 1145. B2W.&S. 377.
24 Clark 452. 17 W.N. C. 437, 4148. & R.440. 7W. 189,192. 4 W. & S,192.
32W.&S. 229. 10 Penn. St. 161. 14 Ibid. 413. 32 Ibid. 539.
4 Act 13 October 1840 3 12. Purd. 377. 1 Phila. 25.
54W. & 8. 278. 15 § Binn. 31. The record need not show that
63 W. 278. witnesses were examined, except in cases of judg-
1 Act 28 March 1820 3 2. Purd. 1145, ment by default. 3 L. Law Rev. 185.
8 Act 20 March 1810 $4, Ibid. 1146, See3 161 Bro. 209. 7 Luz. L. Reg. 191. And see
Penny. 98. 103 Penn. St. 449. 1 Wood. 92. Ibid. 286, 14
92 W. & S. 377. Luz. L. Reg. 252.
101 Bro. 339. 11 Phila. 348, 17 21 Penn. St. 66.
116 W. & 8. 50. 18 1 Lack. L. Rec. 398. See 1 L. Law Rev. 3, as
1210 W. 103. to actions for penalties for breach of ordinance.
132 ACTIONS AT LAW.
rendered! In trespass, it must show whether it was to real or personal property.?
And in a suit against a married woman for necessaries, it must show that the
case is within the statute’ It is sufficient, however, that it substantially show
the justice’s jurisdiction An adjournment must be entered upon the record, in
order to support a subsequent judgment.5 The justice is bound to allow a party
to inspect his record ;* and after the entry of judgment, he has no right to alter
the record." : ;
Tt shall be the duty of the justice, on demand made either by plaintiff or defend.
ant, to make out a copy of his proceedings at large, and deliver the said copy, duly
certified py him, to the party requiring the same; and if on such demand he shall
refuse so to do, it shall be deemed a misdemeanor in office.® An indictment under
this section must state a previous tender of the legal fee ;* an averment that the
demandant paid to the justice the full amount of money which the latter required,
is insufficient; nor will proof, upon the trial, that the demandant paid the precise
sum fixed by the fee-bill, cure the defect.!
6. Transcripts to other Counties.
If the party defendant shall not reside in the county where a judgment is had
against him before a justice of the peace, the person in possession of the docket
in which such judgment may be entered, on application to him made by the plain.
tiff or his agent, shall’ make out, certify and deliver to such applicant a transcript
thereof, and also deliver all evidence in his possession connected therewith, for the
fee of twenty-five cents, for the recovery of the amount thereof with costs, before
any justice of the peace in any county where the defendant may reside or can be
found, as in cases originally brought before him; and the stay of execution shall
be counted from the original entry.4
The person in possession of the docket may give a transcript, though not him-
self a justice. The fee for this service is fixed at fifty cents by the act of 1860.
The justice to whom such transcript is delivered is authorized to proceed on it as
in cases originally brought before him; he may issue an execution thereon in all
cases where the original justice might have issued one; so, he may issue an
attachment-execution on such transcript, whether the defendant be a resident
of his county, or not. And in an action to recover the amount of a judgment
rendered by a justice of the peace in another county, such certified transcript is
prima facie evidence, upon which the plaintiff may recover.® If, however, the
original judgment was void for want of jurisdiction, apparent upon the face of
the record, the proceeding of the justice to whom it is transferred will be set aside
on certiorari."
7. Satisfaction of Judgments.
_Any person or persons who shall not, within thirty days after written notice to
him, her or them given, of the payment of any judgment, together with costs,
in his, her or their favor, before any justice of the peace, either by themselves or
their agents, enter satisfaction on the docket or execution of the justice, shall
be subject to a penalty of one-fourth of the amount of the debt paid, for the use of
the party aggrieved, except where one of the defendants, if there be more than one,
shall, by a writing to be filed by him in the office of such justice, within fifteen
days after the payment, forbid the plaintiff so to do.® This penalty is recoverable
before any alderman or justice of the peace, in the same manner as debts of like
amount may be sued for and recovered.* What would be a sufficient service of a
1 10 Phila. 307. ML Act 20 M:
2 1 Chest. Oo. R. 137. Hieacs.
: 2 Kulp 35. 2 W. 424. 14 Luz. L. Reg. 491,
: 1 vel. ee 100. od 13 W. N.C. 237. 3 Penny. 98.
PY . 14 . » 3 i i .
81 Lack. L. Reo. 396, ees
T 1 Pears. 36. 171 Luz. L. Reg. 269.
; ice 2 28. Purd. 1148. a Act 20 March 1810 215. Purd. 1146.
mee oe 7 Act 4 April 1831 3 1. Ibid. 1147.
«
ACTIONS AT LAW. 133
summons, is a good service of a notice to enter satisfaction. Actual damage need
‘not be proved, in order to a recovery of the penalty.?
VII. Justices’ DOCKETS.
The act of 1839 provides, that every justice of the peace or alderman shall, on
the expiration of his term of office, deliver over his docket, together with all the
notes, bonds, accounts and papers in his possession, touching any judgment or suit
entered thereon, to the person who shall be elected and commissioned to succeed
him in the ward, borough or township.’ And by the act of 1846, this is extended
to all cases of succession in office, whether by death, resignation, removal or other-
wise ; and in case of the decease of any alderman or justice, such delivery shall be
made by his legal representative.‘
Every justice or alderman who shall remove out of the district for which he
is commissioned, shall, upon demand made by any person, deliver or cause to be
delivered his dockets, and all official records connected therewith, to the nearest
-justice or alderman in his said district; and if any person shall fail, for twenty
days, to comply with the provisions of this section, he shall forfeit and pay one
hundred dollars, to be recovered by action of debt, for the use of any person who
may sue for the same; and shall further be subject to be compelled to deliver such
dockets and records, by a decree and attachment against him, which may be made
and issued by any court of common pleas, or by any judge thereof in vacation, on
application being made therefor by any person; and said court, or any judge
thereof in vacation, shall have power, in the same manner, to enforce the delivery
of such dockets and records, against any person in possession of the same, and
being about to remove out of the state, without making the delivery thereof hereby
required, and the same proceedings as are herein authorized may be had, to compel
the delivery of all justices’ dockets in the hand of any other person, who has removed,
or may remove, or be about to remove, out of the proper district, where such dockets
belong
In case of the temporary absence of any justice of the peace from his district, it
shall be lawful for him, previous to his departure, to deposit his docket, and all
papers connected with any judgment rendered by him, with the nearest justice of
the peace in the district, who shall be, and hereby is authorized to issue execution
or executions on said judgments, in the same form and effect as if such judgment or
judgments had been rendered originally by the said nearest justice.
A magistrate who shall receive a ‘docket or transcript” from another, should
read it with attention, regarding it as @ record of his own proceedings. When ap-
plication is made to him to proceed, he should determine what it would be his duty
to do, if the case had been so far heard by himself. If the suit had proceeded no
further than the issuing of a summons, inasmuch as the defendant would by that
summons have been required to appear before another justice than the one before
whom the case is now to be heard, if the defendant did not appear at the time
appointed aud the plaintiff did, it would be proper to send a notice to the defend-
ant, or issue a summons in the usual form, and consider what was thus done as the
first step taken in the institution of the suit. If there had been a hearing, and
the case stood adjourned, notice to the parties should be given by the justice, if
they did not appear at the time to which the case stood adjourned, before he pro-
ceeded any further in the suit. If judgment had been entered, the justice before
whom the case now lay should apprise the defendant, so that he might have an
opportunity, if so disposed, to plead his freehold, or put in special bail, if entitled to
a stay of execution, before the execution should be delivered to a constable. It is
always better that the justice should take even unnecessary trouble, rather than
hazard serious inconvenience to the parties or either of them. If bail should have
been entered and the stay of execution is unexpired, nothing is to be done by the
justice until it shall expire, and he is called upon by the defendant to pay the money,
or by the plaintiff for an execution. In any of which cases, the justice should
proceed as if the suit had originally been instituted, and all the proceedings already
131 Penn. St. 469. 4 Act 21 April 1846 3 6. Purd. 1150.
21 Wh. 187. 5 Ibid. 94, Purd. 1150.
3 Act 21 June 1839 310. Purd. 1149. 6 Act 20 February 1833 3 2. Purd. 1149.
134 ACTIONS AT LAW.
had, had been had before him. In the clear and emphatic language of the law,
‘ the justice to whom the docket or transcript shall be delivered shall issue process,
and proceed thereon, im the same manner and with the like effect, as the justice
before whom the proceedings had taken place might have done if he had remained
in office,”
A justice whose term has expired, and whose place has been filled by election,
has no right to retain his docket, and certify a transcript, in order to found pro-
ceedings before another justice! And in case of the temporary absence of a justice,
no other justice can issue execution on a judgment rendered by him, unless the
docket be deposited with such justice; such execution would be void, and the con-
stable acting under it a trespasser.2? An execution issued by one justice on the
transcript of another justice of the same county, who was at the time in commis-
sion, and acting in his office, is void; not being allowed by any act of assembly.
A justice has no jurisdiction of a cause of action founded on the judgment of
another justice, except as prescribed by the statute; he cannot, therefore, set off
such judgment against one on his own docket.‘ ; ‘
Tn all cases where the docket of any acting alderman or justice of the peace
shall have been, or may hereafter be destroyed or lost, it shall be lawful for any
person or persons interested in any action pending, or judgment had, and who may
be desirous to have the same supplied, to apply to such alderman or justice by
petition, setting forth the proceeding to be supplied, and verified by affidavit;
whereupon the said alderman or justice shall issue a precept in the nature of a writ
of summons, which shall be served as in other cases, requiring the defendant in
such action of judgment, or his representatives, to appear before such alderman
or justice on a day certain, to be named in said writ, not less than five nor more
than eight days from the issuing thereof, and show cause why the prayer of the
petitioner should not be granted; and in all cases where the facts set forth in such
petition shall be denied, it shall be the duty of such alderman or justice to hear
the parties and receive testimony as in other cases, as well his own testimony upon
affidavit, as the testimony of others, and upon the hearing thereof, if the said
alderman or justice shall be of the opinion that the facts alleged in such petition
are true, or in case such facts be not denied, he shall order that the said proceed-
ings be supplied; and shal] thereupon enter the same upon his docket, which said
entries shall have the same force and effect as if the original record had not been
lost or destroyed ; and either party may have his remedy by appeal or certiorari, as
in other cases.
VIIJ. OvurnInE oF PROCEEDINGS, IN A CIVIL SUIT, BEFORE A JUSTICE OF THE
PEACE OR ALDERMAN.
In giving an outline of the proceedings which generally occur in a suit before a justice
or alderman, an example will be given, in the first place, of a case of ordinary occur-
rence. Afterwards examples will be given of suits in which objections and difficulties
of law or fact arise.
i z ames Thompson holds a promissory note, and the protest thereof. The note is as
ollows :
“S737 qs : Philadelphia, June 12th, 1873.
Three months after date, I promise to pay to Joseph Parker, or order, seventy-threeyy
dollars, without defalcation, for value received. (Signed,) WM. JACK.
(Indorsed,) “JOSEPH PARKER.” ;
In September 1879, Thompson, the holder of the note, finding that six years was about
to ane since the protest of the note, and, consequently, that che statute of limitations
would bar his remedy against the parties whose names are on it, unless suit were brought
before the 15th September 1879, determines to bring suit against the maker, William
Jack, who has some property ; Parker, the indorser, being insolvent.
He goes, therefore, to Magistrate Smith, of the city of Philadelphia, and informs him
he wishes to bring suit against William Jack. The magistrate inquires for the residence
of Jack, and finds it to be No. 30-North Eighth street, in the city of Philadelphia, where
co Penn. St. 168, 1 Pears. 194. 2 Leg. Reo. 5 4 Penn. St. 338.
168, * 46 Penn. St. 519.
2 2 Phila. 2384. 5 Act 30 April 1850, Purd. 1150.
ACTIONS AT LAW. 135
upon he issues a summons, returnable on the 16th, between the hours of 10 and 1]
o'clock, a. u.
[The form of the summons will be found under the title “« Summons.”
This summons is put into the hands of G. R., the constable, who having been told the
residence of the defendant, calls at his house, and finding him, gives him an exact copy
of the original summons. The constable then writes on the back of it these words»
“Served personally on the defendant, by producing to him the original summons, and
informing him of the contents thereof, September 10th, 1879. G. R., Constable.”
The constable then hands the original summons to the magistrate, who administers an
oath to him, verifying the truth of the return. The magistrate makes this memorandum
on the back of the summons, and under the constable’s return, viz.: “Sworn to the truth
of this return, this 12th day of September 1879. R. 8. 8., Mag.”
The magistrate then files the summons.
DOCKET ENTRY IN THIS CASE.
On , 16th September 1879, at 10 o’clock, defendant appears in the magistrate’s
office, and the plaintiff not appearing, defendant asks for a nonsuit. The magistrate
informs him that the parties are allowed until the expiration of the last hour named in
the summons, to appear, which time has not yet elapsed; but that if plaintiff, or his
attorney, or agent, should not appear at the expiration of the time so allowed, a nonsuit
would be entered. At 11 o’clock, plaintiff appears with his witnesses.
The plaintiff, Thompson, produces the promissory note, and calls John Carr to prove
the signature of William Jack, the maker and defendant, The witness is sworn.
Magistrate—Are you acquainted with the handwriting of William Jack? Carr, the
witness.— Yes, I am.
Magistrate —How did you become acquainted with it? Witness.—I have seen him
write.
Magistrate.—Look at the signature to this paper eee him the promissory note),
and say if you know that handwriting. Witness.—(After examining the signature.) I
believe it to be the handwriting of William Jack, the defendant. ;
Magistrate, (to defendant.)—Do you wish to cross-examine the witness ?
Defendant, (to witness.)—When and where did you see me write? Witness.—I saw
you write a receipt, about three years ago, in your own house, for money I paid you. At
another time, about a year ago, you came to my store, and wrote an order for several
articles of groceries, which you wished me to send to your house. Some months after,
you gave me your note for the amount of the groceries, which was paid when it fell due;
and I have seen your writing and signature at other times.
Defendant.—Can you swear that that (pointing to the signature on the note on which
the suit is brought) is my handwriting? Witness.—I believe that to be your signature.
Defendant submits to the magistrate that witness cannot swear that to be his signature,
but only swears as to his belief, and that the signature is not sufficiently proved.
Magistrate—The witness having shown that he is acquainted with your handwriting,
his belief that this is your signature is sufficient. :
2 Taparars (to plaintiff.) —You must also prove the signature of the indorser, Joseph
arker.
Plaintiff calls James Hall.
Magistrate, (to witness.) —Take the book, (handing him a Bible.) Witness.—I affirm.
. Defendant.—Are you conscientiously scrupulous about taking an oath? Witness.—
am.
Magistrate, (to witness.)—You do solemnly, sincerely and truly declare and affirm, that
the testimony you will give in the matter now pending before me, shall be the truth, the
whole truth, and nothing but the truth: so you affirm. Witness bows assent.
¥ Magistrate.—Are you acquainted with the handwriting of Joseph Parker? Witness.—
es.
Magistrate.—How did you become acquainted with it? Witness.—By receiving letters
from him, and having a bill of exchange on him, which, after accepting, was paid by him
to me.
Magistrate——Can you say that from these circumstances you are acquainted with his
handwriting? Witness.—Yes, 1 can.
Defendant.—I submit that inasmuch as the witness has never seen Joseph Parker
write, he is incompetent to prove his signature.
Magistrate, (to defendant.)—You may cross-examine the witness further as to how he
became acquainted with Parker’s handwriting.
Defendant, (to witness.)—How do you know that the letters you received from Parker,
pele came from him? Witness.—I received them in the course of correspondence with
im,
Defendant.—How many letters did you receive from him? Witness.—The exact
number I cannot tell, but as many as six or seven, I should say.
136 ACTIONS AT LAW.
Defendant.—Where are these letters? Witness.—Some of them, I suppose, are lost
or mislaid; others are among my papers at my store. : :
Defendant.—At what time did you receive the letters? Witness.—I received them
during several months, about a year to eighteen months ago. f ;
Defendant.—You spoke of a bill of exchange. Who were the parties to that bill, and
what was the amount of it? Witness.—It was drawn by John Neal, on Parker, in my
favor, payable, I think, at ninety days, for something over $300. I inclosed it in a letter
to Parker, who then resided in New York, for his acceptance. He returned it with an
answer in a few days, having the acceptance and his signature written on it.
Defendant.—Did you ever see Parker write? Witness.—-No. . :
Defendant, (to magistrate. )—I submit that, never having seen Parker write, the witness
is incompetent to prove his handwriting. Livre :
Magistrate.—In order to become acquainted with handwriting, it is not essential to have
seen the party write, if the witness has had other sufficient means of knowing it. This
witness appears to have had sufficient means of becoming acquainted with the hand-
writing of Parker, though he never saw him write. I consider him, therefore, a com-
petent witness. .
Magistrate, (to witness.)—Look at the name on the back of the note, and say if you
‘ know whose signature it is. Witness. (after examining the name.)—TI believe that to be
the signature of Joseph Parker. .
Magistrate, (to defendant.)—Do you wish to cross-examine the witness further? De
JSendant.—No.
Magistrate, (to defendant.)—Have you any witnesses? Defendant.—No.
Magistrate—Do you wish to say anything by way of defence? Defendant.—It ap-
pears to be more than six years since the note fell due, and the claim is barred by the
statute of limitation.
Magistrate.—It is true, that it is more than six years, counting from to-day, but it was
less than six years counting from the day on which suit was brought, which is the legal
time to count from. (To plaintiff.)\—Have you a bill of your claim? Plaintiff.—Yes.
(handing in a bill.) of which this is a copy:
1873. Wm. Jack to James Thompson, Dr.
Sept. 15. To amount of his promissory note, due this day, and protested for
1879, non-payment, 5 3 , A . ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘: . $73.27
Sept. 16. Interest for six years, say . - 3 ‘ : 5 a - 25.28
Cost of protest, : . 7 : . ‘ . : . ‘ 1.38
$99.98
Magistrate enters judgment for plaintiff for ninety-nine dollars and 4§,.
Plaintiff—When can I have execution? Magistrate.—Immediately, if you wish: but
if an appeal be taken by the defendant, or bail for stay of execution be entered, within
twenty days from this time, the execution must be stayed.
Plaintiff.—I shall wait until the expiration of twenty days, before I ask for an execu-
tion.
Plaintiff then pays the magistrate the costs of suit, and the parties retire.
At the expiration of twenty days after judgment, plaintiff calls on the magistrate and
desires that execution may issue. The magistrate turns to his docket, and ascertains
that no appeal has been taken, nor any bail entered for stay of execution. He therefore
fills up an execution. [For a copy, see the title “ Exzcurion.”]
The execution is put into the hands of a constable, who proceeds forthwith to the house
of the defendant, No. 30 North Eighth street, and informs him he has an execution
against him at the suit of James Thompson, for $101.25, and requests it may be paid.
Defendant says he has no money, and cannot pay the amount. The constable then
makes a levy on so much of the goods or furniture of defendant as will, in his opinion,
produce, at moderate auction prices, fully the amount called for by his execution. The
defendant claims the benefit of the $300 exemption law, and having selected such articles
as he wishes to retain, they are appraised, and $300 set apart for his use. The constable
should be careful not to make an excessive levy, that is, to levy on so great a quantity
of goods as is beyond all reasonable proportion to the amount of the claim. The con-
stable having made his levy, should note on the back of the execution the time when he
makes it, and indorse thereon, or on a schedule to be thereto annexed, a list of the
articles levied on. :
In strictness, the constable might at once remove the articles levied on, to be safely
kept, in order that they may be sold, but it is customary to leave the goods on the pre-
mises, with or without a watchman, or security, at the discretion of the constable, until
the day of sale. If the goods levied on are not forthcoming on the day of sale, the
constable is liable to the defendant for the amount called for by his execution.
The constable should make out an advertisement in the following form, viz. :
ACTIONS AT LAW. 137
CONSTABLE’S SALE.
To be sold, at Public Vendue, on Monday the 20th day of October 1879, at 10 o’clock
in the forenoon, at the house of John Bob, No. 10 N. Sixth street, ten mahogany chairs,
two arm-chairs, a mahogany bureau, and an eight-day clock. Seized and taken in
execution, as the property of James Thompson, and to be sold by
Philadelphia, October 13th, 1879. ’ Mason Naytsr, Constable.
Three of these advertisements at least, should be put up at the most public places of
the district, and the sale should be made within twenty days after the time when the
execution came into the constable’s hand. The sale must be by public auction, a private
sale would be void, and would be set aside on application. The notice or advertisement
of sale should be made at least six days before the sale. The terms of sale should be
cash on delivery of the goods. Should the proceeds of sale exceed the amount of the
judgment, interest, costs and expenses, the overplus should be promptly handed over by
the constable to the defendant. If not, the defendant should apply to the justice, who
should order the constable to pay the proceeds into his office, and he will pay over the
surplus to defendant.
he constable should also without delay pay into the justice’s office, or to the plaintiff,
the amount of the judgment, interest and costs incurred by the plaintiff, taking plain-
tiff’s receipt. He should then make return to the justice, produce the receipt of the
plaintiff, and pay to the justice the fees, if any there be, to which he is entitled.
Satisfaction may be entered on the justice’s docket by the plaintiff, thus:
Received satisfaction, November 12th, 1879.
(Signed) James THOMPSON.
Or plaintiff may sign a receipt on the docket for the debt, interest and costs, specifying
the amount, and the case is determined.
A CONTESTED CIVIL CASE BEFORE A JUSTICE OR ALDERMAN.
Freperick Haxz, to the use of Cuaries Heirrics, Magistrate’s Court,
v.
James O’ConNELL. No. 3.
September 18th, 1879. Summons issued in the above case. Returnable 24th September
1879, between the hours of 3 and 4 o'clock, p. m.
Plaintiff appeared, by his attorney, L.
Defendant appeared, by his attorney, S. H.
Plaintiff’s attorney stated that the suit was brought to recover $38, due by defendant
to plaintiff, on a contract of guaranty, whereby defendant agreed with plaintiff, Hake, to
guaranty the payment to Hake, of the rent of the house No. 79 Queen street, belonging
to Hake, and occupied by Patrick Ward; that Ward was in arrear $38, and suit was
therefore brought against his surety, the defendant, to recover that amount.
Defendant's attorney stated that at this stage it was proper he should interpose certain
objections to the regularity of the proceedings. He moved that the writ of summons
be quashed, because no legal service of it had been made four days before the return
of it, and called the constable as a witness.
Plaintiff's attorney objects —The constable has already made his return under oath,
and indorsement on the back of the writ, which shows that the service was made on the
18th September, more than four days before the return ; this is conclusive :—if the con-
stable has made a false return, defendant has his remedy against him.
Magistrate.—If the constable has made a mistake in regard to the return, the return
may be amended on his application. Constable.—I served the summons on the 18th, on
defendant, by leaving a true copy, as I then thought, at his dwelling-house with one of
the family, but after making the return, I found that the copy I then left was not a true
copy, and this morning I served the defendant with a true copy.
Magistrate.—That will not do. You had better apply for leave to amend your return,
Constable.—I do so, according to the facts as I have stated them.
Magistrate.—W hich is, that you served the summons on defendant on the 24th Septem-
ber 1879, by leaving a trwe copy thereof at his dwelling-house with one of the family?
Constable.—Yes.
Magistrate indorses the amendment on the back of the writ, and swears constable to
the truth thereof.
Defendant's attorney.—I now move to quash the writ of summons, on the grounds
already laid.
Plaintiff's attorney.—I suppose, if insisted on, it must be done.
Magistrate——The writ is quashed.
Plaintiff’s attorney, the costs being paid, orders a new summons as before.
138 ACTIONS AT LAW.
v
James O’ConneELL.
September 24th, 1879. Summons issued in the above case. Returnable September
30th, 1879, between the hours of 3 and 4 o’clock, rp. u., when plaintiff and defendant
appeared with their attorneys.
Defendant in person asked the magistrate to file a plea in abatement in the case, which
was done, and a note thereof made on the docket, viz. “ September 30th, defendant, in
erson, files a plea in abatement that defendant’s name is James McConnell, and not
ames O'Connell, and verifies it on oath.” This plea of misnomer, as filed, was in the
following form, viz. °
Freperick Hake, to the,use of CHARLES ey Magistrate’s Court,
o. 3.
James McCowne.t, sued by the
name of James O’ConNELL,
ads. Magistrate’s Court,
Freperick Haxg, to the use of No. 3.
Cuarves Hevrricx.
And the said James McConnell, whom the said Frederick Hake, to the use of Charles
Helfrick, has sued by the name of James O’Connell, in his own person, comes and says,
that he is named and called by the name of James McConnell, and by the said surname
of McConnell hath always hitherto been called and known, without this that he, the said
James McConnell, now is, or ever was, named or called or known by the surname of
O'Connell, as by the writ of summons in the said case is supposed. And this he, the said
James McConnell, is ready to verify. Wherefore he prays judgment of the said writ,
and that the same be quashed.
James McConnell, sued by the name of James O’Connell, of the city of Philadelphia,
the defendant in this cause, maketh oath and saith, that the plea hereunto annexed is
true in substance and matter of fact. James McConneLt.
Sworn and subscribed before me, the 30th September 1879. R. B.S., Mag.
(Norz.—A plea in abatement is put in by the party, who pleads it in person, and he
may swear to its truth, as in the foregoing plea, before the magistrate, at the time of
putting it in. Such pleas must be pleaded before the magistrate or justice, otherwise
they cannot afterwards be pleaded when the case is taken to the common pleas on appeal.
It may be well doubted whether, in putting in a plea in abatement before a justice, it is
necessary for the party to do more than state the subject-matter of his plea to the justice,
requesting him to enter the same on his docket, and offering to prove it by witnesses.]
Plaintiff's attorney asks the magistrate to enter a replication to said plea of misnomer,
and note the same on his docket, which is done thus:
“Sept. 30th, 1879, plaintiff’s attorney files replication that defendant was and is called
and known by the name of James O’Connell, as well as by that of James McConnell.”
Magistrate. (to defendant.)--Call your witnesses to prove that your name is James
McConnell.
Defendant's attorney calls John Smith, who is sworn by the magistrate.
Defendant's attorney.—Do you know the defendant here, and how long have you known
him? Witness.—I know James McConnell, the defendant, and have known him for ten
years.
Defendant's attorney.—By what name is he generally known? Witness.—By the name
of James McConnell.
Cross-enamined by plaintiff’s attorney.—Do you know by what name he is generally
known? Witness——Yes; I have been well acquainted with him, and those who know
him, for ten years.
Plaintif’’s attorney.—Do you not know that he is sometimes called James O’Connell,
as well as James McConnell? Wétness.—No; I never heard him called by any other
name than James McConnell.
Magistrate. (to plaintiff’s attorney.)—Have you any more questions to ask the witness ?
Plaintif?’s attorney.—No.
Magistrate.—Have you any witness to examine as to defendant’ intiff
attorney,—Yes; J cme Todd. Pee named Sins
James Todd being sworn :
Plaintiff’s attorney.—Do you know defendant? Witness.—I know him to see him, but
ee hee with him. :
laintiff’s attorney.—By what name is he called? Witness.— : but
I a heard es ae the name of James O'Connell. Beye Me cenaeny bet
ross-examined by defendant's attorney.— How often i
name of O’Connell? Witness.—Once or wie, See
Defendant's attorney.—Who called him so? Witness.--Joseph Horn.
ACTIONS AT LAW. 139
Defendant's attorney.—What did he say? Witness.—He said that there was a man
living at No. 79 Queen street, called O’Connell, or McConnell, who had voted the demo-
cratic ticket at the last election. ‘
Defendant's attorney.—Did he say he was well acquainted with him? Witness.—No. |
Defendant's attorney.—Who else did you hear call defendant by the name of O’Con-:
nell? Witness.—I do not remember any one else.
'_ Magistrate (to plaintiff's attorney).—Have you any more witnesses on this point?
Plaintiff's attorney.—No.
Magistrate.—That is not sufficient.
Plaintiff's attorney.—I move to amend the record, by altering the name of James
O’Connell to James McConnell, under the act of 4 May 1852.
Magistrate—Have you any evidence of mistake?
Plaintiff's attorney calls Charles Helfrick, the equitable plaintiff, who, having been -
sworn, says that he was informed by Frederick Hake that the defendant’s name was
James O'Connell, and that he so instructed his attorney.
Mogistrate—That is enough—the amendment is allowed. The record is amended
accordingly. i
Plaintiff’s attorney states the cause of action as in the first suit; and offers in evidence
a deed for the house and lot No. 79 Queen street, dated 24th August 1841, from James
Jackson and Maria, his wife, to Frederick Hake, duly acknowledged and recorded. The
defendant's attorney examines the deed, and, making no objection, it is given in evidence.
Plaintiff's attorney next offers in evidence a certain assignment, whereof this is a copy,
viz. +
For and in consideration of ten dollars, to me in hand paid by Charles Helfrick, before
and at the time of the execution hereof, [ hereby assign, transfer and make over to the
said Charles, all my right, title and interest in and to a certain claim of thirty-eight dol-
lars, or thereabouts, which I have against James O’Connell, or McConnell, on a guaranty,
wherein he, the said O’Connell, or McConnell, guarantied the payment to me, by Patrick
Ward, of certain rent, but in the payment whereof the said Ward is now in arrear to the
amount aforesaid, or thereabout. Witness my hand and seal, this 10th July 1879.
Signed, sealed and delivered, (Signed,) Frep’k Hake. [seat]
in the presence of us,
James JacKson, W1LLIam Dopp.
Plaintiffs attorney hands the assignment to defendant’s attorney, who examines it,
and asks proof of its execution.
James Jackson affirmed.
Plaintiff's attorney (handing witness the assignment, and calling his attention to the
name James Jackson, thereon).—Is that your handwriting? Witness.—Yes.
Plaintiff’s attorney.—Were you present at the execution of that instrument? Wit-
ness.—Yes. I saw Fred. Hake sign his name to it. ;
Ptaintiff’s attorney—-Who were present besides Hake and you? Witness.—William
Dodd, who witnessed the execution, and Charles Helfrick.
Plaintif’’s attorney. What became of the paper after its execution? Witness.—Hake
gave it to Helfrick.
Cross-examined by defendant's attorney.—What else took place at the execution?
Witness.—I do not recollect anything else.
Defendant's attorney —Then there was no money paid. Witness.—Yes, I do recollect
that Helfrick paid Hake some money, but how much I do not know.
William Dodd sworn. The testimony of this witness was the same as the last.
Plaintiff's attorney offers James Humphreys as a witness, who is sworn.
Plaintif’’s attorney.—State whether you were present at a conversation or agreement
between Hake and McConnell, the defendant, as to the payment of rent that was to
become due by Patrick Ward. Witness.—Defendant occupied the house No. 79 Queen
street, for a year and a half, when he left it. Before leaving, I called on him in company
with Hake, and found that Patrick Ward occupied one of the rooms. Hake inquired
whether Ward was not leaving the house at the same time with himself. He said he
believed not, that he had let the room to him about 6 weeks ago, at $5 per month, and the
second month was not yet expired—that he was a good tenant and would pay punctually
—that he would go his security that he would pay his rent. On this, Hake let Ward remain
in the room. He stayed there for twelve months, and only paid me $22 of rent during
that time, and there is $38 now in arrear. I was Hake’s agent to collect the rent.
Cross-examined by defendant's attorncy.—Did defendant say anything else on the
subject at that, or any other time? Witness.—Not that I can recollect. :
Defendant's attorney.—What reply did Hake make to McConnell, when he said he
would go Ward's security? Witness.—I don’t know that he made any reply. ;
Defendant’s attorney.—Did you ever speak to McConnell afterwards on the subject?
Witness.—Yes, before bringing suit. I asked him to pay the arrears due by Ward.
Defendant's attorney.—What reply did he make? Witness.—That he would not pay
a cent—that he never guarantied the payment of rent.
140 ACTS OF ASSEMBLY.
Defendant's attorney.—Then I understand you to say, that until after the rent fell into
arrear, the amount of which is now claimed, Hake never told or notified defendant that
he accepted him as security for Ward. Witness.—No, but we thought that letting Ward
remain in the room amounted to the same thing.
Magistrate, (to plaintiff's attorney.)—Have you any other witness? Plaintif’’s attor.
ney.—No, I consider Humphreys’ testimony sufficient to make out the case for plaintiff,
Defendant's attorney contends that the testimony made out no case agaiust defendant;
that in order to bind a person on a contract of guaranty there must be a mutual assent
between the guarantor and guarantee that it shall operate; the latter must accept the
guarantee—a mere offer to guaranty is not binding unless duly accepted. Citing Adams
v. Jones, 12 Pet. 207; Lee v. Dick, 10 Ibid. 482; Chitty on Cont. 500, &c. Besides, the
act of assembly of 1855 requires a contract of guaranty to be in writing. Purd. Dig.
831
Plaintiff's attorney replied, that the permitting Ward to remain on the premises after
the guaranty by defendant, was a sufficient assent and acceptance on the part of the plain-
tiff; that a bare offer to guaranty without any express assent or notice had been held in
several cases sufficient to charge the guarantor. Oring Caton v. Shaw, 2 Har. & Gill
13; Norton v. Eastman, 4 Greenl. 521; Tuckerman v. French, 7 Ibid. 115; Seaver v.
Bradley, 6 Ibid. 60; Train v. Jones, 11 Vt. 444.
Magistrate.—I will deliver my opinion and give judgment in this case on the 8th inst.,
at-4 o'clock P. mM.
October 8th, 1879, parties present. Magistrate—It does not appear that Hake ever
assented to or accepted the offer of guaranty made by the defendant, or ever gave him
any notice that he would look to him for the rent, if it fell in arrear. I do not think the
fact that plaintiff left Ward on the premises any sufficient evidence that he assented
to or accepted defendant’s offer, since he never informed him that he did so on
account of his guarantee. It is unnecessary to determine whether this case falls within
the act of 1855 or not. Judgment is therefore entered for the defendant.
Acts of Assembly or Statutes.
I. Revival of acts in force before the revolu- III. Construction of statutes.
tion. IV. Constitutionality of statutes.
IL. Statutes to be strictly pursued.
I. REVIVAL OF ACTS IN FOROE BEFORE THE REVOLUTION.
The first legislature under the commonwealth enacted, by act of 28th January
1777, that each and every one of the laws or acts of general assembly that were
in force and binding on the inhabitants of the province, on the 14th May 1776,
should be in force and binding on the inhabitants of this state, from and after the
10th February 1777, as fully and effectually, to all intents and purposes, as if
the said laws, and each of them, had been made or enacted by that general assem-
bly. And also the common law, and such of the statute laws of England, as had
heretofore been in force within the province, except such as were repugnant to or
inconsistent with the constitution of the commonwealth
Statutes made in Great Britain before the settlement of Pennsylvania have no
force here, unless they are convenient and adapted to the circumstances of this
country. And English statutes made since the settlement of Pennsylvania have no
force here, wnless the colonies are particularly named. The common law cf England
has always been enforced in Pennsylvania.? Fe
The first legislature under the commonwealth has clearly fixed the rule respect-
ing the extension of British statutes, by enacting that “such of the statutes as
have been enforced in the late province of Pennsylvania should remain in force,
till altered by the legislature. hy the charter from Charles IT. to William Penn,
the laws of England relating to property were to be the laws of Pennsylvania, until
eliured by the legislature British statutes may be in force in Pennsylvania, by
usage.
1 Purd. 76. 5 1 Dall. 67, McKean, 0 J. F i
3 ‘ ' . For a list of the
: 1 Dall. 67. 2 Bion, 581, English statutes in force in Pennsylvania, 88
all, 74. 3 Binn. 599. And see Bright. Dig. 2207.
# Thid. 287.
ACTS OF ASSEMBLY. 141
IJ. STATUTES TO BE STRIOTLY PURSUED.
In all cases where a remedy is provided, or duty enjoined, or anything directed
to be done by any act or acts of assembly of this commonwealth, the directions of
the said acts shall be strictly pursued, and no penalty shall be inflicted, or anything
done agreeably to the provisions of the common law in such cases, further than
shall be necessary for carrying such act or acts into effect.
This act was formally held to extend only to penal actions and indictable offences.?
But recent decisions have enlarged the sphere of its operation, and it now applies
both to civil and criminal proceedings.’ An indictment for nuisance is not within
its provisions, although a statutory remedy be provided. Nor are actions of tres-
pass quare clausum fregit, for distraining where there is no rent in arrear.6 And
ejectment lies by a mortgagee, notwithstanding the act of 1705, giving a remedy
by scire facias® So, in conferring on the courts chancery powers, the legisla-
ture have nov ousted them of their common-law jurisdiction.? The courts will
not, however, grant an injunction, where the plaintiff has a complete statutory
remedy.®
But an indictment for extortion in taking illegal fees is not sustainable ;° nor
against a tax-collector for embezzlement ; nor can a person be held to surety of
the peace, except in the cases mentioned in the act of 1700." The remedy against
guardians, &c., is exclusively in the orphans’ court.” To recover a legacy, charged
on land, the provisions of the act of 1834 must be pursued. A widow cannot
maintain dower, where her husband died seised, and in possession; her sole remedy
is in the orphans’ court.“ Nor can the heirs maintain ejectment against the
widow ;¥ nor a vendee, to enforce specific execution of a parol contract for
the sale of land, by a deceased vendor ;* nor can a distributee maintain an action
against the executors of a decedent for his share of the estate.” Nor can the reg-
ularity and legality of a municipal election be inquired into, except in the mode
prescribed by statute.!
III. ConstRUCTION OF STATUTES.
The whole of the civil jurisdiction of the justices of the peace, and the greater part of,
the proceedings before them, being given and regulated by statute law (acts of assembly),
the following observations on the “interpretation and exposition of statutes,” will be
found of essential service to magistrates, in enabling them correctly to ascertain, and
thus fully carry out, the intentions of the acts of our legislature.
There are several descriptions of acts of congress and of the general assembly.
These are public general acts—public local acts—private acts—and resolutions,
which are sometimes of a public and general nature, sometimes local and private.
A general or public act regards the whole community ; a special or private act
relates only to particular persons or to private concerns. The courts of justice are
bound ea officio to notice public acts, without their being formally set forth, but not
80 with regard to private acts, unless formally shown and pleaded.
Statutes are declaratory, remedial and penal. Declaratory acts are made where
the old custom of the country is almost fallen into disuse, or becomes disputable, in
which case the legislature has thought proper, for avoiding all doubts and difficulties,
to declare what the common law is and ever hath been. Remedial acts are made,
from time to time, to supply the defects
1 Act 21 March 1806 3 13. Purd. 77. This
statute was re-enacted as to criminal prosecutions,
by the 183d section of the revised penal code,
without, however, repealing the original act.
268. & R. 289.
M. 63. 1 R. 290.
18. &R. 345. Bright. 69.
8. & R. 286.
2 Thid. 240.
ila. 314,
2
1
6
1
6
8 Phila. 314.
138. & R. 426, 1 R. 457.
5
1
1
discovered in the common law, whether
13 9 W. 60.
14 3 Penn. St. 60. 29 Ibid. 306. 65 Ibid. 480.
66 Ibid. 270. See 43 Ibid. 474.
15 § Whart 208. 65 Penn. St. 480.
16 17 Penn. St. 193. 2 Gr. 103.
17 20 Penn. St. 474. 25 Ibid. 213.
18 28 Ibid. 9. 35 [bid. 263. 44 Ibid. 332. 20
Leg. Int. 100. Ibid. 101. 18 Pitts. L. J. 131.
And see 3S. & R. 273. 1 Ibid. 32. 7 Ibid. 469.
14 Ibid. 162. 17 Ibid. 346. 3 P. & W. 180. 5
Whart. 357. 3 W. 330. 7 Ibid. 199. 9 Ibid. 19.
3.W. & S. 540. 6 Ibid. 242, 14 Penn. St. 66. 51
Ibid. 96. Ibid. 160. Ibid. 394. 98 Ibid. 546,
2 Ash. 252. 2 Pars. 351. 2 Chest. Co. R. 293.
142 ACTS OF ASSEMBLY.
they arise from the general imperfection of all human laws, from change of time
and circumstances, from mistakes and unadvised determinations, or from any other
cause. Penal statutes are such whereby a forfeiture is inflicted for transgressing
the provision therein contained; and a penal statute may also be a remedial law,
and a statute may be penal in one part and remedial in another.
All statutes ought to be plainly and clearly, and not cunningly and darkly penned,
especially in penal matters; they should be shortly and artificially penned, so as to
comprehend much matter in few words, and so as to leave as little to construction as
ossible.*
: The parts of a statute, in a popular, though not ina legal sense, are the title, the pre-
amble, the purview or body of the act, the clauses, provisoes, ewceptions, and the date
or day of receiving the assent of the chief magistrate. ‘The title of a statute is no
part of it; it is but a mere usage, and the title is not the law, but the name and
description given to it by its makers? The preamble of an act usually contains the
motives and inducements to the making of it, but it has been held to be no part
of the act. In doubtful cases, recourse may be had to the preamble, in order to
discover the inducements of the legislature im, making the statute, but where
the terms of the enacting clauses are clear and positive, the preamble cannot be
resorted to.
Public acts are binding upon every citizen ; the judges are bound to take judicial
notice of them; every citizen is, in judgment of law, privy to the making of them,
and supposed to know them ; the passing of an act of assembly is a public proceed-
ing in all its stages, and when the act is passed, it is, in contemplation of law, the
act of the whole community
The true meaning ef the statute is generally and properly to be sought from the
purview or body of the act. The preamble of a statute is no more than a rerital
of some inconveniences, which by no means excludes any other, for which a remeay is
given by the enacting part of the statute.
It is an established rule in the exposition of the statutes, that the intention of
the legislature is to be deduced from a view of the whole of the statute, taken and
compared together. In construing acts of the legislature, the courts are not to look
only at the language of the preamble, or of any particular clause. If they find in the
preamble, or in any particular clause, an expression not so large and extensive
in its import as those used in other parts of the act, it is their duty to give effect to
the larger expressions. A statute ought, upon the whole, to be construed so that,
if it can be prevented, no clause, sentence or word, should be superfluous, void or
insignificant.
The purview or body of an act may be qualified or restrained by a saving clause
in the statute. But a saving clause, where it is directly repugnant to the purview
of the act, and cannot stand without rendering the act inconsistent and destruc.
tive of itself, is to be rejected.
A proviso in an act is something engrafted upon a preceding enactment; and
where the proviso is clearly repugnant to the purview of it, the proviso shall stand,
and be held a repeal of the purview, because it speaks the last intention of the leg-
islature. It is to be compared toa will, in which the latter part, if inconsistent
with the former, supersedes and revokes it. There is a known distinction in the
law between an exception in the purview of an act, and the proviso. If there ir
an exception in the enacting clause of a statute, it must be negatived by pleading:
a separate proviso need not. In a criminal case, what comes by way of proviso in a
statute, must be insisted on for the purposes of defence, by the party accused ; but
where exceptions are in the enacting part, it must in the indictment charge that
the indictment is not within any of them.
1 See Coode on Legislative Expression, in the
Appendix to Purd. Dig.
7 It is otherwise, since the constitutional
amendment of 1864. 66 Penn. St. 164. 70 Ibid.
311. 6 Phila. 492.
3 “The act of the whole community.” This
assumption is more emphatically true of the laws
enacted in the United States, and in the several
states, ‘han it is of those passed under any other
known form of government. In no existing gov-
ernment, is the voice of the people so imperative
as in these United States. Hence the right of
instruction by the constituent is universally
acknowledged, and almost as generally regarded
as binding on the representative. Thus it is, 98
it were, the democracy, the whole people, speaking
through the mouths of the individuals whom
they have sent to represent them, and who thus,
and thus only, can faithfully represent those by
whom they were elected. ,
ACTS OF ASSEMBLY. 143
The indorsement on an act, by the clerk of the legislature, of the day, month and
year when it received the assent of the chief magistrate, is the date of the act,
and shall be taken to be part of the act. ‘
The qualities and incidents of a statute are :—
1. An act of the legislature binds all persons but such as are specially saved
by it.
We. A statute which gives corporal punishment, does not bind an infant; contra
of other statutes, if they do not except infants.
3. Every statute made against an injury gives a remedy by action, expressly or
impliedly.
4, An act of the legislature cannot alter by reason of time, but the common law
may, since cessante ratione, cessat et ipsa lex [when the reason of law ceases, the
law itself ceases with it].
5. When the statutes are made, there are some things which are exempted and
foreprized out of the provisions thereof, by the law of reason, though not expressly
mentioned; thus things for necessity’s sake, or to prevent the failure of justice,
are excepted out of statutes.
6. Whenever an act gives anything generally and without any special intention
declared, or rationally to be inferred, it gives it always subject to the general control
and order of the common law.
7. Whenever a statute gives or provides anything, the common law provides all
remedies and requisites.
8. In statutes, incidents are always supplied by intendment; in other words,
whenever a power is given by a statute, everything necessary to the making of it
effectual is given by implication; for the maxim is, guando lex aliquid concedit,
_ concedere videtur et 1d per quod devenitur ad illud [when the law permits anything,
it seems also to permit that by which the end is obtained].
9. Quando aliquid prohibetur, et omne per quod devenitur ad illud [when any-
thing is forbidden, everything else is also forbidden that induces that end], by
which every oppressionary law by color of any usurped authority is forbidden, and
all things by all manner of means tending to destruction are prohibited.
10. Whenever the provision of a statute is general, everything which is necessary
to make such provision effectual is supplied by the common law.
11. If an offence is made felony by a statute, such statute does, by necessary
consequence, subject the offender to the like attainder and forfeiture, and does
require the like construction, as to those who shall be accounted accessories before
Ks after the fact, and to all other intents and purposes as a felony, as the common
aw does.
A misrecital of the day on which the legislature was held, or of the sessions, or
of the place of making the statute, or a repugnancy in reciting the day of its
making, will be fatal, and so, if any material part is omitted or misrecited. Trifling
variations, which do not alter the sense of the material parts of a statute, would
not be considered fatal.
Every statute, for the continuance of which no time is limited, is perpetual,
although it is not expressly declared to be so. A temporary statute continues in
force (unless it is sooner repealed) until the time for which it is made to expire; a
perpetual statute until it is repealed. If an expired statute be afterwards revived
by another statute, the law derives its force from the first, which is to be considered
as in operation by means of this revival. No proceedings can be pursued under a
repealed statute, though commenced before the repeal, unless by special exception.
A statute cannot be repealed by non-user. But though non-user can never repeal
the words of an act of the legislature, where they are plain, yet a series of practice,
without any exception, goes a great way to explain them, where there is any
ambiguity.
Where one statute is repealed by anuther statute, acts done in the mean time,
while it was in force, shall endure and stand, and be good and effectual; but not so,
if the former statute be declared nuld and void.
By the repeal of a repealing statute, the new law containing nothing in it that
manifests the intention of the former act shall continue repealed, the original stat-
ute is revived ; but if a statute be repealed by several acts, a repeal of one or two,
«
144 ACTS OF ASSEMBLY.
and not of all, does not revive the first statute. Ifa repealing statute, and part of
the original statute, be repealed by a subsequent act, the residue of the original
statute is revived. And if an act of the legislature is revived, all acts explanatory
of that act so revived, are revived also. When an act of the legislature is repealed,
it must be considered (except as to transactions passed and closed) as if it had
never existed.
When a statute commands or prohibits a thing of public concern, the person
guilty of disobedience to the statute, besides being answerable in an action to the
party injured, is likewise liable to be indicted for the disobedience. Whenever
the statute forbids the doing of a thing, the doing is wilful, although without anv
corrupt motive, and indictable. If a statute enjoins an act to be done, without
pointing out any mode of punishment, an indictment will lie for disobeying the
injunction of the legislature. Where a statute only enacts that the doing of any
act not punishable before, shall for the future be punishable in such and such a
particular manner, there the particular method prescribed by the act must be spe-
cifically pursued, and not the common-law method of indictment. The mention
of other methods of proceeding impliedly excludes that of indictment, as where
a statute appoints a particular manner of proceeding against an offender, viz., by
commitment, or action of debt, or information, without mentioning an indictment,
no indictment lies.
The construction of a statute, like the operation of a devise, depends upon the
apparent intention of the maker, to be collected either from the particular pro-
vision, or the general context. Acts of the legislature ought to be construed
according to the intention of the parties that make them. The great object of the
rules and maxims of interpretation is to discover the true intention of the law:
and whenever that intention can be indubitably ascertained, the courts are bound.
to give it effect, whatever may be their opinion of its wisdom or feeling. A thing
which és within the letter of the statute is not within the statute, unless it is
within the intention of the makers.
Great regard ought, in construing a statute, to be paid to the construction which
the sages of the law put upon it, because they are the best able to judge of the
intention of the makers when the law was made.
In the exposition of a statute, the leading clue to the construction to be made,
is the intention of the legislature, and that may be discovered from different signs.
Asa primary rule, it is to be collected from the words; when the words are not
explicit, it is to be gathered from the occasion and necessity of the law, being the
causes which moved the legislature to enact it.
For the sure and true interpretation of all statutes in general, whether penal or
beneficial, restrictive or enlarging of the common law, three things are to be con-
sidered :—
1. What was the common law, before the making of the act ?
2, What was the mischief and defect against which the common law did not
provide?
3. What remedy the legislature hath resolved and appointed to cure the disease
of the common law?
The best interpretation of a statute is to construe it as near to the rule and
reason of the commén law as may be. When a statute alters the common law, the
meaning shall not be strained beyond the words, except in cases of public utility,
when the end of the act appears to be larger than the enacting words. Ifa statute
makes use of a word, the meaning of which is well known, and has a certain defi-
nite sense at the common law, the word shall be expounded and received in the
same sease in which it is understood at the common law,
It is the most natural and germaine exposition of a statute, to examine one part
by another part of the same statute, for that best expresses the meaning of the
‘makers, and such construction is ex visceribus actés. If any part of a statute is
intricate, obscure or doubtful, the proper way to discover the intent is to consider
the other parts of the act ; for the words and meaning of one part of a statute fre-
quently lead to the sense of another, and in the construction of one part of a stat-
ate, every other part ought to be taken into consideration. And another rule of
ACTS OF ASSEMBLY. 145
interpretation is, that one part of a statute must be so construed by another that
the whole may, if possible, stand.
The words of a statute are to be taken in their ordinary and familiar acceptation,
and regard is to be had to their general and popular use. And though where the
words of a statute are doubtful, general usage may be called in to explain them,
such usages that can control the words of a statute must be universal, and not the
usage of any particular place. If words of art are used, they are to be taken in
their technical sense.
Where the object of the legislator is plain and unequivocal, the courts ought to
adopt such a construction as will best effectuate the intention of the lawgiver.
Where the legislature has used words of a plain and definite import, it would be
dangerous to put upon them a construction which would amount to holding that
the legislature did not mean what it has expressed. In all cases where the inten-
tion of the legislature is brought into question, it is best to adhere to the words of
the statute, construing them according to their nature and import, in the order in
which they stand in the act. The courts are not to presume the intentions of the
legislature, but to collect them from the words of the act; and they have nothing to
do with the policy of the law. They are not to construe statutes by equity, but
to collect the sense of the legislature by a sound interpretation of its language, and
according to reason and grammatical correctness.
It is a safe method, in interpreting statutes, to give effect to the particular words
of the enacting clauses. Ifthe words of a statute go beyond the intention, it rests
with the legislature to make an alteration; the duty of the court is only to con-
strue and give effect to the provisions. A casus omissus, that is, something omitted
and not provided for by the statute, can in no wise be supplied by a court of law,
for that would be to make laws. Judges are bound to take the act of the legisla-
ture as the legislature has made it.
A remedial statute should be so construed as most effectually to meet the bene-
ficial end in view, and to prevent a failure of the remedy; and as a general rule, a
remedial statute ought to be construed liberally. A statute for the public good
should be construed in such a manner as it may, as far as possible, attain the end
proposed. The true intent and meaning of a statute is always to be regarded; and
to such purpose only ought the words to be construed. Constructions of statutes
are to made according to the intent of the framers, and not by any strict or strained
interpretations.
Penal statutes receive a strict interpretation. The general words of a penal
statute shall be restrained for the benefit of him against whom the penalty is
inflicted. Penal statutes are taken strictly and literally only in the point of defin-
ing and setting down the fact and punishment, and not generally. A penal law
shall not be extended by construction. The law of Pennsylvania does not allow of
constructive offences nor of arbitrary punishments. No man incurs a penalty, unless
the act which subjects him to it is clearly within both the spirit and the letter
of the statute imposing the penalty.
Where a statute creates a penalty, and says one moiety shall be to the use of the
state, county, &c., and the other to a common informer, the state, county, &c., may
‘sue for the whole, unless a common informer has commenced a gut tam suit for the
penalty, Where an offence, created or made fraud by statute, is in its nature
single, one single penalty only can be recovered, though several join in committing
it; butif the offence is in its nature several, each offender is separately liable to
the penalty.
Statutes which give costs are to be taken strictly, as being a kind of penalty,
Costs are only due by act of assembly, none being recoverable at common law.
Whenever a statute imposes terms, and prescribes a thing to be done within a certain,
time, the lapse of even a day is fatal, even in the penal statute, because no inferior
court can admit of any terms but such as directly and precisely satisfy the law.
Acts of the legislature which take away the trial by jury, and abridge the liberty
of the citizen, ought to receive the strictest construction. It is a settled rule of
law, that every charge upon the citizen must be imposed by clear and unambiguous
language. Statutes against frauds are a satisfactory exception to the rule that
penal statutes are to be taken strictly.
10
146 ACTS OF ASSEMBLY.
Where the meaning of a statute is doubtful, the consequences may be considered
_in the construction; but where the meaning is plain, no consequences are to be
regarded in the interpretation, for this would be assuming a legislative authority.
Words are to be taken in a lawful and rightful sense. Where a statute will
bear two interpretations, one contrary to plain sense, the other agreeable to it,
the latter shall prevail. Any absurd consequences, manifestly contradictory to
common reason, are void.
Words and phrases, the meaning of which, in a statute, has been ascertained,
are, when used in a subsequent statute, to be understood in the same sense.
Where an act of the legislature gives authority to one person expressly, all others
are excluded, and a special power is ever to be strictly pursued. Where an aet of
the legislature gives power to two justices finally to hear and determine un offence,
it is necessarily supposed that they shall be together, or which is the same thing,
that they shall hold a special sessions for that purpose; for it is unknown to the
laws that two persons shall act as judges in the same cause, when at the same time
one of them is in one part of the country, and the other in another. Wherea
statute gives power to the justices to require any person fo take the oaths, or do
any other thing, the law, by necessary implication, gives them power to issue their
precept to convene the parties. Where a statute appoints a conviction to be on
the oath of one witness, this ought not to be by the single oath of the informer.
When an act of the legislature empowers justices of the peace to bind a person
over, or cause him to do a certain thing, and such person, being in his presence,
shall refuse to be bound, or to do such a thing, a power of commitment is implied,
and the justice may commit him to the jail, to remain there till he shall comply.
Where a statute appoints imprisonment, but limits no time how long, the prisoner,
in such a case, must remain at the discretion of the court.
Where an act of the legislature gives power to justices of the peace to take order
in any matter, according to their discretion, this shall be understood according to the
rules of reason, law and justice, and not governed by private opinion. Where
the amount of security to be taken is left in the discretion of any court, it will be
good to follow the precedents of former times. Where an act directs that the jus-
tices shall commit an offender to prison for twelve mouths, the justices may not alter
the words and commit him for a year; for in this respect twelve months and one
year are not the same, but the month must be computed at twenty-eight days to the
month, and not as a calendar month, unless it be so expressed in the act.
A jit person to execute an office, is one apt and fit to execute his office, who has
three things—honesty, knowledge and ability ; honesty to execute it without malice,
affection or partiality; knowledge to know what he ought duly to do; and ability,
as well in estate as in body, that he may intend and execute his office, when need
is, diligently, and not from impotency or poverty neglect it.
IV. ConstITuTIoNALITY OF STATUTES.
It is a principle in the English law, that an act of parliament, delivered in clear
and intelligible terms, cannot be questioned, nor its authority controlled in any court
of justice." But this principle in the English government, that the parliament is
omnipotent, does not prevail in the United States. In this, as in all other countries
where there is a written constitution, designating the powers and duties of the leg-
islature, as well as of the other departments of the government, an act of the
legislature may be void as being against the constitution. It must conform, in
the first place, to the constitution of the United States, and then to the subordinate
eee of its own state, and if it infringe the provisions of either, it is so far
void.
The judicial department is the proper power in the government to determine
whether a statute be or be not constitutional. To contend that the courts of jus-
tice must obey the requisitions of an act of the legislature, when it appears to them
to have been passed in violation of the constitution, would be to contend, that the
law was superior to the constitution, and that the judges had no right to look inte
1 1 Kent’s Com. 446, 2 Thid. 448.
ACTS OF ASSEMBLY. 147
it, and to regard it as the paramount law.’ It has accordingly become a settled
principle in the legal polity of this country, that it belongs to the judicial power,
as a matter of right and of duty, to declare every act of the legislature made in viola-
tion of the constitution, or of any provision of it, null and void?
A statute, when duly made, takes effect from its date, when no time is fixed, and
this is now the settled rule. A retroactive statute would partake in its character
Of the mischiefs of an ex post facto law, as to all cases of crimes and penalties; and in
every other case relating to contracts or property, it would be against every sound
principle. It would come within the reach of the doctrine, that a statute is not to
have a retrospective effect.’
The legislature, provided it does not violate the constitutional prohibition, may
pass retrospective laws, such as in their operation may affect suits pending and give
to a party a remedy, or remove an impediment in the way of recovering redress by
legal proceedings.4 Until the judiciary has fixed the meaning of a doubtful law,
upon which rights have become vested, it may be explained by legislative enact-
ment.’ The bill of rights requires that the law relating to a transaction in
controversy, at the time when it is complete, shall be an inherent element in the
case and shall guide the decision, and that the case shall not be altered in its sub-
stance, by any subsequent law.®
An act is passed only when it has gone through all the forms made necessary by
the constitution to give it force and validity as a binding rule of conduct for the
citizen ; and it cannot impair a contract made after it has passed both houses of
the legislature, but before its approval by the governor.”
It must always be borne in mind, that the object of the constitution is not to
grant legislative power, but to confine and restrain it. Without the constitutional
limitations, the power of the legislature to make laws would be absclute* The
rule of interpretation for the state constitution differs totally from that which is
applicable to the constitution of the United States. The latter instrument must
have a strict construetion ; the former, a liberal one. Congress can pass no laws but
those which the constitution authorizes, either expressly or by clear implication ;
whilst the assembly has jurisdiction of all subjects in which its legislation is not
prohibited® And to justify the court in pronouncing an act unconstitutional, it must
conflict with some exception or prohibition of the constitution, clearly expressed,
or necessarily implied; if its constitutionality depend on the construction of a
word, any meaning thereof, whether technical or popular, which will sustain the
constitutionality of the statute, will be adopted. But the court cannot look beyond
the constitution itself; the general principles of justice, liberty or right, are not
elements of decision!
1 1 Kent’s Com. 449. T 33 Penn. St. 202.
2 Ibid. 450. 8 Wheat. 11. 5 Clark 17, 2 Am. 86W.&S.117. 15 N.Y. 549. 46 Ibid. 401.
L. J. 287-8. 12S. & R. 330. 9 17 Penn. St. 119. 21 Ibid. 160. 52 Ibid. 474,
3 1 Kent’s Com. 454-5. And see 26 Ibid. 287. 1 Brewst. 524.
44W. 4&8. 218. 10 Penn. St. 280. 3 99 Penn. St. 540. And see 3 S. & R. 169
546. &S. 223, 21 Penn. St. 147. 50 Ibid. 150. 66 Ibid, 164
§ 33 Penn. St. 495. 31 Ibid. 288. 3 Phila, 494. 1 21 Ibid. 147. 26 Ibid. 287.
[ 148 J
Adulteration,
And Sale of Unwholesome Provisions.
Aot 31 Maron 1860. Purd. 473.
Szor. 69. If any person shall sell, or expose for sale, the flesh of any diseased
animal, or any other unwholesome flesh, knowing the same ‘o be diseased or
unwholesome, or sell, or expose for sale, unwholesome bread, drin. or liquor, know-
ing the same to be unwholesome; or shall adulterate for the pu nose of sale, or
sell any flour, meal or other article of food, any wine, beer, spirit. of any kind,
or other liquor intended for drinking, knowing them to be adulter. 2d; or shall
adulterate for sale, or shall sell, knowing the same to be so adulterated, any drugs
or medicines; such person so offending shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon
conviction be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding one hundred dollars, or undergo
an imprisonment not exceeding six months, or both, or either, at the discretion of
the court.
The sale of unwholesome flesh meat is indictable, although the taint be imper-
ceptible to the senses, and the eating of it produced no apparent injury. Guilty
knowledge that a cow which has a running sore on the head, is unfit for food, may
be inferred, without proving that the accused had any scientific skill in deter-
mining such questions.
Act 7 May 1855. Purd. 1294.
Szor. 1. It shall not be lawful for any butcher or other person to expose for sale
any tainted or unwholesome meat or fish, or any veal less than three weeks old
when killed, in any of the market-houses or other places for vending meat, in any
of the cities or boroughs in the several counties of this commonwealth, under a
penalty of ten dollars for each offence, to be recovered as other penalties are reco-
verable, before any alderman or justice of the peace; one-half of said penalty to go
to the informer, and the other half for the benefit of the poor
Aor 29 Marcu 1860. Purd. 1233.
Szor. 1. In all actions for the sale of any spirituous, vinous or malt liquors, or
any admixtures thereof, it shall be competent for the defendant, in every such case,
to prove that said liquors or admixtures thereof were impure, vitiated or adulterated,
and proof thereof being made, shall amount to a good and legal defence to the whole
of the plaintiff's demand.
This act only applies to cases where the quality or value of the liquors has been
impaired by the impurity, vitiation or adulteration?
Aor 14 Aprit 1863. Purd. 1234.
Szor. 1. It shall be unlawful for any person or persons to make use of any active
poison or other deleterious drugs, in any quantity or quantities, in the manufacture
or preparation, by process of rectifying or otherwise, of any intoxicating malt or
alcoholic liquors, or for any person or persons to knowingly sell such poisoned
or drugged liquors, in any quantity or quantities; and any person or persons so
offending shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor.
Szor. 2. It shall be the duty of any person or persons engaged in the manufac-
ture and sale of intoxicating malt or alcoholic liquors, or in rectifying or preparing
the same in any way, to brand on each barrel, cask or other vessel containing the
same, the name or names of the person or persons manufacturing, rectifying or
preparing the same, and also these words, “ containing no deleterious drugs
or added poison ;” and shall also certify the same fact or facts to the purchaser, over
his, her or their own proper signature. ,
110N. Y. 574, 200 Dann ca an
ADULTERATION. 149
Sor. 3. If any barrel, cask or other vessel containing any such drugged or
poisoned liquor shall be fonnd in the possession of any person or persons desig-
nated in sections one and two, it shall be deemed prim@ facie evidence of a violation
of the provisions of this act.
Szor. 4. Any suspected article or specimen of intoxicating malt or alcoholic
liquor, shall be subjected to analysis by some competent person to perform the
same, under the direction of the court before which the case is tried; and such
analysis, duly certified under oath, shall be deemed legal evidence in any court in
this state: Provided, That upon any preliminary examination, before any justice
of the peace, mayor or other magistrate or competent authority, for the purpose of
binding over, such officer may order the inspection aforesaid to be made, and make
such order as may be necessary to preserve the evidence of the offence until the
trial of the offender
Sxcr. 5. Any person offending against any of the provisions of this act shall be
deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and, on conviction thereof, shall be sentenced to
pay a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars, and to undergo an imprisonment not
exceeding twelve months, or both, or either, in the discretion of the court.
Act 2 June 1881. Purd. 474.
Szor. 1. Any and all persons engaged in the business of brewing or manufac-
ture of ale, beer or other malt liquors, or in the fermentation, distillation or
manufacture of any vinous or spirituous liquors, are hereby prohibited making
use, in or about such business, or in any such process of brewing, fermentation,
distillation or manufacture, of any poisonous or deleterious drugs or chemicals, or
any impure or injurious materials, or such as are prejudicial to the public health,
or to the health of any person drinking or making use of any such malt, vinous or
spirituous liquors,
Sxct. 2. The use of any such poisonous or deleterious drugs or chemicals, or
impure or injurious materials, or of those prejudicial to health, as are prohibited by
the first section of this act, is hereby declared to be a misdemeanor, and any per.
son convicted of so using the same, shall be punished by a fine of one thousanc
dollars, and by an imprisonment of not more than one year.
Act 25 May 1878. Purd. 1332.
Sxror. 1. Any person or persons, who shall knowingly sell or exchange, or expose
for sale or exchange, any impure, adulterated or unwholesome milk, shall be deemed
guilty of a misdemeanor, and on conviction shall be punished by a fine of not less
than twenty dollars for each and every offence; and if the fine be not paid, shall be
imprisoned for not less than fifteen days, or until said fine shall be paid.’
Scr. 2. Any person who shall adulterate milk, with a view of offering the same
for sale or exchange, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and on conviction
shall be punished by a fine of not less than ten dollars for each and every offence ;
and if the fine be not paid, shall be imprisoned for not less than eight days, or until
said fine is paid. .
Sxct. 5. The addition of water or of ice to the milk is hereby declared an adultera-
tion; any milk obtained from animals fed on distillery-waste or any substance in a
state of putrefaction, is hereby declared to be impure and unwholesome.”
Act 10 June 1881. Purd. 1332.
Sect. 1. If any person or persons shall, with intent to defraud, sell, supply or
bring to be manufactured, to any butter or cheese manufactory in this state, any
milk, diluted with water, or in any way adulterated, uncleanly or impure, or milk
from which cream has been taken, or milk commonly known as skimmed milk, or if
any person or persons so furnishing milk as aforesaid, shall keep back any part of the
milk known as “strippings,’’ or shall knowingly bring or supply milk to any butter or
cheese manufactory that is tainted or partially sour, or shall knowingly bring or supply
1See 4 Ill, App. 52. 73 .N. ¥.65. 21 Ibid. milk in cities of the 2d and 3d classes. Purd.
263. 1382. The act 22 May 1887, forbids the adul-
2 See act 7 July 1885, as to the adulteration of teration of confectionery.
150 ADULTERY.
to any butter or cheese manufactory, milk drawn from cows within fifteen days before
parturition, or within five days after parturition, shall, for each offence, forfeit and
pay a sum not less than ten dollars nor more than one hundred dollars, with costs
of suit, to be sued for in any court of competent jurisdiction for the benefit of the
person or persons, firm or association or corporation upon whom such fraud or ne-
glect shall be committed.
Act 24 May 1887. Purd. 110.
Sror. 9. No person shall knowingly, wilfully or fraudulently falsify or adulterate, or
cause to be falsified or adulterated, any drug or medical substance, or any preparation
authorized or recognized by the pharmacopoeia of the United States, or used or in-
tended to be used in medicinal practice, nor mix or cause to be mixed with any such
drug or medicinal substance any foreign or inert substance whatsoever, for the pur-
pose of destroying or weakening its medicinal power and effect, and wilfully, know-
ingly or fraudulently sell or cause the same to be sold for medicinal purposes. Any
person who shall violate this section shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and
upon conviction thereof shall be punished by a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars,
and shall forfeit to the commonwealth all articles so adulterated.
Adultery.
I. Adultery, the crime of, defined. IV. Warrant for adultery.
II. Acts of assembly relating to adultery. V. A commitment for adultery.
III. Judicial decisions. VI. A docket-entry.
I. Aputtery is the illicit intercourse of two persons, one of whom at least is mar-
ried ;* and therefore a married man may be guilty of adultery by carnal intercourse
with a singlewoman.’ But an indictment for adultery cannot be supported against
an unmarried man, though the other party be married; in him, it is simple fornica-
tion.* Originally, the offence was of temporal jurisdiction, but after the statute of
circumspecte agatis, it was remitted to the spiritual courts;* and therefore he must
now look to the statute law for its punishment.
II. Act 31 Marcu 1860. Purd. 474.
Sect. 36. If any married man shall have carnal connection with any woman not his
lawful wife, or any married woman have carnal connection with any man not her law-
ful husband, he or she so offending shall be deemed guilty of adultery, and on convic-
tion, be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars, and undergo an
imprisonment not exceeding one year, or both, or either, at the discretion of the
court.
IIT. In an indictment for adultery, it is sufficient to state that the def. i
a wife, M. A. H., in full life, did commit adultery with one M. M.; wae aha
alleging carnal knowledge, and without averring that M. M. was not his wife.> In an
indictment for incestuous adultery, it is unnecessary to charge a common knowledge
of the relationship, if the charge of knowing the relationship be made against the
party indicted.® An indictment against a married woman for adultery, must set forth
name of her husband.” ,
The oath of a married woman is not sufficient to sustain a warrant for the arrest
of her husband for adultery.2 And on the trial of a man charged with adultery.
the husband of the alleged particeps criminis is not a competent witness for the
16 Ala. 864. 2 Strob. Eq. 174. *4Y.7.
2 33 Penn. St. 68. 5 33 Penn. St. 68
82 Dall, 124. 1 ¥. 6. The solicitation of 611 Ala. 989.
another to commit adultery is not indictable. 72 Pars. 475. 4 Clark 271.
54 Penn. St. 209. 81 Gr. 218; contra, 46 Mich, 221,
ADULTERY. 151
prosecution ;* nor can a wife be a witness against another woman, charged with
fornication with the husband of the former? The wife cannot be a witness to
criminate her husband, or to state that which she has learned from him in their
confidential intercourse; the rule which protects the domestic relations from expo-
sure, rests upon considerations connected with the peace of families; and it is
considered, that this principle does not afford protection to the husband and wife,
while they are at liberty to invoke it or not, at their discretion, when the question
is propounded, but it renders them incompetent to disclose facts in evidence, in
violation of the rule.’ “It is essential to the happiness of social life, that the con-
fidence subsisting between husband and wife should be sacredly protected and
cherished, in its most unlimited extent; to break down or impair the great prin-
ciples which protect the sanctities of that relation, would be to destroy the best
solace of human existence.’’* It has been held, however, that upon an indictment
for adultery, the husband of the woman with whom the act was committed, may
testify to ctrewmstances which do not directly criminate, but only tend to criminate
her.6 The fact of adultery may be proved by circumstantial evidence.6 And the
fact of the defendant’s marriage may be proved by his admissions.”
On a conviction for adultery, the defendant cannot be sentenced to imprisonment
at hard labor. A delivery by the wife, to her paramour, of her husband’s goods,
with kuowledge that she had taken them without authority, is sufficient to support
an indictment for larceny against the adulterer.2 A wife’s insanity is not a bar to
a divorce for adultery, committed by her when she was insane, although it would
not be punishable by indictment.’
IV. WARRANT FOR ADULTERY.
DELAWARE COUNTY, ss.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To the Constable of the Township of S——, in the county of Delaware, greeting :
Wuersas, J. L., of H , in the said county, cordwainer, hath made oath before J. P.,
one of our Justices of the Peace in and for the county aforesaid, that 8. B., of S—— town-
ship, in the said county, yeoman, on the nineteenth day of March last past, at H——,
aforesaid (being a married man and having a wife in full life), did commit adultery with
a certain R. W., the wife of D. W., of H——, aforesaid, laborer. These are, therefore, to
command you forthwith to’ take the said S. B., and bring him before the said J. P., to
answer unto the said complaint, and further to be dealt with according to law. Witness
the said J. P., at H——, aforesaid, the third day of June, in the year of our Lord one
thousand eight hundred and eighty-five. J. P., Justice of the Peace.
V. A COMMITMENT FOR ADULTERY.
DELAWARE COUNTY, ss.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To the Constable of H——, in the County of Delaware, and to the Keeper of the
Common Jail of the said County, greeting:
Wuerzas, R. W., the wife of D. W.. of H——, in the said county, laborer, hath been
charged, on the oath of J. L., before J. P., one of the Justices of the Peace in and for
the said county, with committing adultery with a certain S. B., of S—— township, in the
said county, yeoman: These are, therefore, to command you, the said constable, forth-
with to convey the said R. W. to the common jail of the said county, and deliver her into
the custody of the keeper thereof; and you the said keeper are hereby commanded to
receive the said R. W. into your custody, in the said jail, and her there safely keep, until
she be thence delivered by due course of law. Witness the said J. P., of H afore-
said, the tenth day of June, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and
eighty-five. C. D., Justice of the Peace. [szat.]
112 W. N. 0. 108; 2 Brewst. 569; contra, 8
Phila. 385.
2 Commonwealth v. Rachel Shriver, Q. S. Phila.
1820. On the trial of this indictment, which was
for fornication with William Robbins, Mary Rob-
bins, the wife of William Robbins, was offered as
a witness for the prosecution, but rejected by the
court, on the authority of 2 T. R. 268, cited in 1
McNally 161; 2 Ld. Raym. 752; 2 Phil. Ev. 65,
as her husband might be criminated by her evi-
dence. MS.
812 Dat 908 This case was not alluded to, in
8 Phila. 3885; although in the former, 2 T. R. 268
was approved, though not to its full extent.
£12 W.N.C.108. See also 1 Root 485. 26
Me. 30.
5 49 Vt. 202. And see 4 Edw. Ch. 624.
6 2 Greenl. Ey. 3 40. 36 Ala. 295. 49 Vt. 202,
72 Me. 531.
7121 Mass. 61.
8 3 Binn. 79. s. Pp. 3 Penn. St. 223.
92 Am. L. Reg. 695. See the cases on this
subject collected in 2 Fish, Dig. 2530-31.
10 6 Penn. St. 337.
152 ADVICE.
VI. DockxET-ENTRY, IN CASE OF ADULTERY.
CoMMONWEALTH June 3d, 1885, warrant issued, X. Y., constable, on the oath
vs. of J. L., charging the defendant with having, on the 19th of
G. B. March last, at H., in the county of H. (he being a married man,
and his wife living), committed adultery with a certain RW.
cosTs. June 10th, defendant brought up. J. W., sw.; C. F. sw.
Bail required, $300, to appear next Court of Quarter Sessions,
for the county of D. A :
J. L., cordwainer, of H. township, bound in $100, to testify
at the next Court of Quarter Sessions, &e. ; ;
G. B., yeoman, of D. township, } Each tent in $300, that
G. L., currier, of T. township, § defendant shall appear at
the next Court of Quarter Sessions, for the county
of D., &e.
justice. + $1.50
Constable . . 4
Adbice,
How it should be given.
A Maaistrate is very frequently called upon for information and advice, in
matters civil and criminal. He will on such, as on every other occasion, feel the
advantages of having his mind stored with legal information, to the end that he
may not lead those who rely upon him, into difficulties, by giving erroneous opinions
and advice. He should never give advice upon any agreement, &c., which has been
reduced to writing, without having the writing itself before him. If he has reason.
able doubts, as to his ability to give the advice asked, let him not scruple to say so,
and advise the party to go where he can be correctly informed. If the first step
taken shall be in the right direction, every future one may be expected to carry
the party nearer to the object he desires to attain. But if, from a want of correct
advice, he shall set out in a wrong direction, every step will, in all probability, take
him farther from the object of which he is in pursuit.
When called upon for advice, the justice considers how great a trust and confidence
is reposed in him, and seeks to discharge it with becoming fidelity. Having, as best
he can, informed himself fully of the facts, he looks at them in every point of view,
not omitting to weigh well the claims of natural justice, and to observe whether he
who asks his advice be careful to fulfil its obligations. If he find that natural and
positive justice unite in giving right to the party who seeks his advice, he acquaints
him with the strength of his case—advises (if with prudence it may be done) that
it be laid open to his opponent, and restitution be demanded ; which if he refuses to
make, then, and not till then, he advises an appeal to the tribunals of justice.
If, on the contrary, positive law alone, according to the letter, reluctantly yield to
the party an advantage which the law of God peremptorily forbids him to seize, the
justice dissuades him from further prosecution of it, in such manner, that either
he must bring new matter to show that his case is other than at first it appeared,
or must seek another instrument whereby to prosecute his work of injustice. Tf,
upon a consideration of the whole matter, the case appears to the justice to be one
of doubt, he states plainly his reasons for so considering it, and recommends, if
the claim be small, that it be abandoned, or that, at all events, means of amicably
terminating it be first tried.
In criminal matters, it is especially becoming in a justice to weigh carefully,
and consider well, whatever may be submitted to him for consideration, before he
shall venture upon an opinion; always taking care to make drawbacks upon what-
ever statements may be made under the influence of strong feelings. In relation
to disputes and misunderstandings among families, or former friends, let every pos-
sible means be taken to effect a good understanding ; let the cup of conciliation be
drained to the dregs, before any hostile measure be advised, or any process what-
ever be issued,
A justice ought, before giving an opinion in a criminal case, to be especially
careful to ascertain all the facts, and everything within the knowledge of the com-
plainant; for it should always be bornein mind that tha adwina of a tentta~ -0 11-
ADVICE. 153
peace will not screen the party to whom it is given from a suit for malicious prose-
cution, if the charge appear to have been made without probable cause.?
The justice should carefully guard against giving a decided opinion, upon any
matter or thing which, it is probable, may come before him for decision. Persons
making statements are apt to be biassed by their feelings and interests; in the state-
ments which they make, they often, insensibly even to themselves, give to the facts
a coloring, which so disguises the real state of the case, that the most penetrating
eye can scarcely discern what is true from what is false. By the exercise of patience,
and the devotion of some time, the magistrate may be able to get such a view of
the subject as shall enable him to give advice which may be essentially useful to the
party who has called upon him, and aid him to do justice between the parties, if
called upon. °
If the justice shall be induced to give a decided opinion, on the representation
made by the party, and, relying on that opinion, the party shall determine to insti-
tute a suit, the justice should decline to issue process, and send the party—if
determined to sue—to some other justice. If the justice who has given the opinion,
upon which the suit is about to be instituted, shall yield to the solicitations of the
complaining party, and issue process, there is danger that the opinion he has given
may bias his judgment, so that he will not be that impartial judge which law and
justice require him to be, in deciding upon the interests of his fellow-citizens.
Again, the case, when it comes to be heard, may, and very often does, exhibit a
very different state of things from what the justice had been led to expect, and he
may feel bound to give judgment against the plaintiff, who had been induced to
bring suit, upon the faith of an opinion which had, by misrepresentation, been
extorted from the justice. The plaintiff is, in such a case, apt to become angry,
because the justice has given judgment against him. He never excuses the justice,
and blames himself; nor will he admit, that in his statement he had discolored
the facts. The best and only honest course for the justice, who gives a decided
opinion upon a case stated, is to refuse to issue process in relation to it. It is
well for every magistrate to avoid, as much as he can, hearing anything about
the cause of action or complaint, until the parties meet to submit their “ proofs and
allegations.”
A magistrate is frequently called upon for advice, in relation to cases, in which
he has issued process, and, of course, where it is known that he is the justice who
is to give judgment in the case. The party, who thus inquires, is often wholly
unacquainted with the manner of doing business in a magistrate’s office. He is
altogether at a loss; he does not know what he ought to do, however small the
matter in controversy, in order to have his case brought, fully and fairly, before
the justice. Whether such applications be from the party plaintiff, or the party
defendant, the magistrate should feel equally at liberty, and equally bound, to
give the information required. His ear and his mind should be as open and acces-
sible to the one party as to the other. He is not the counsel of either party, but
appointed as an impartial umpire to decide between them. In him, it is in no wise
unbecoming, to give to either party such advice as shall enable them to bring all
the facts before him, so that he may give judgment, “as to right and justice shall
belong.” The advice here spoken of is not, in any wise, to trench upon the facts
or merits of the case; but simply, to give instruction and advice to assist the unin-
formed how to do himself justice, and put his case, honestly, before the magistrate.
All this may be accomplished without much trouble; and much good will follow
from advice thus given with single-heartedness, and an honest desire that the truth
may be made manifest.
_How much good may be done, or how much evil averted, by the advice of magis-
trates, it is not in the power of any human being to estimate, whatever may have been
his opportunities, or how great soever the reach of his understanding. Let, there-
fore, every justice of the peace, before he gives advice, feel his own responsibility,
not only to the person who applies, but to his country and his God; and the advice,
which he gives, will be what it ought to be, and it will bring peace to his own
mind, and descend, as the gentle dew from heaven, on the heads of his fellow-
beings,
1 100 Penn. St. 91. 37 Md. 282. 82 Mass. 381.
[ 154 ]
Affvay.
I. An affray defined. : III. Warrant and return of constable.
If. An affray, judicial decisions on. IV. Docket-entry in case of an affray,
I. An Arrray is the fighting of two or more persons, in some public place, to
the terror of the people of the commonwealth ; for, if the fighting be in private, it is
no affray, but an assault!’ And there must be a stroke given or offered, or a weapon
drawn, otherwise it is no affray.?
Mere words will not constitute an affray A fight commenced in a private place,
but carried by flight and pursuit to a public place, is an affray. Whether the
place is public or private, is matter of proof.®
II. Affrays may be suppressed by any private person present, who is justifiable
in endeavoring to part the combatants, whatever consequences may ensue® A
private person cannot, of his own authority, arrest a person who has been engaged
in an affray or a breach of the peace. But during the affray, any person may, with-
out a warrant from a magistrate, restrain any of the offenders, in order to preserve
the peace.”
A justice of the peace cannot, without a warrant, authorize the arrest of any per-
son for an affray out of his view, yet, it is clear, that in such a case he may make
his warrant to bring the offender before him, in order to compel him to find sureties
for the peace?
The revised penal code provides that if any person shall be concerned in an affray,
and shall be thereof convicted, he shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and be sentenced
to pay a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars, or undergo an imprisonment not
exceeding two years, or both, or either, at the discretion of the court.?
Affrays receive aggravations from the persons against whom, or the place where,
they are committed. As, where the officers of justice are violently disturbed in the
due execution of their office, as by the rescous of a person legally arrested, or the bare
attempt to make such a rescous ; for all the ministers of the law are under its more
immediate protection.”
III. Warrant FOR AN AFFRAY.
DELAWARE COUNTY, ss.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To the Constable of the Township of D , in the County of Delaware, greeting:
Wuereas, J. L., of the township of D , in the county of Delaware, yeoman, hath
this day made oath before J. P., one of our Justices of the Peace in and for the said
county, that on the thirtieth day of September, last past, R. S. and S. B., both of the
township of L , in the said county, yeomen, at D township aforesaid, in a
tumultuous manner, made an affray, wherein the person of the said J. L. was beaten and
abused by them, the said R. S. and 8. B.: These are, therefore, to command you, forth-
with to apprehend the said R. S. and S. B., and bring them before the said J. P., to
answer the said complaint, and to be further dealt with according to law. Witness the
said J. P., at D township aforesaid, the third day of October, in the year of our
Lord one thousand eight hundred and seventy-nine. ;
J. P., Justice of the Peace. [szat.]
Return of the Constable—I have taken the within-named S. B., whose body I have
ready, as within I am commanded ; but the within-named R. S. is not found In ‘my baili-
wick. X. Y., Constable of D township, Octuber 4th, 1879.
1 1 Hawk. P. C. oh. 63. 4 Bl Com. 145. 11 5 30 Texas 431.
Daly 1. 5 Yerg. 356. 6 4 Bl. Com. 145. 1 Cr. 0. 0. 310.
2 3 Inst. 158, 7 2 Johns. 486.
316 Als. 65. 13 Ga. 322. 8 1 Hawk. P. C. ch. 63, 3 18.
4 3 Heisk. 278. 72 Mo. 662. As towhatisa 9% Purd. 536. :
ee Place, see 22 Ala. 15; and see 83 N.C. 1 1 Hawk. P. C. ch. 63, 3 22. Bright. 46
~
AGRICULTURAL SOCIETIES. 155
IV. DockET-ENTRY ON A CHARGE OF AN AFFRAY.
ComMONWEALTH October 3d, 1879, warrant issued, X. Y., constable, on the
vs. oath of J. L., charging the defendant with having been en-
8S. D. gaged in an affray wherein deponent was beaten.
October 4th, defendant brought up; J. L. sw.; ©. P. aff.;
Costs. G. L. sw. Bail required from defendant in $200.
jostion > > 0: +: $210) J. L., of the township of D., farmer, | Each tent. in $100, to
c. P., —_—_— C., currier, f testify, &c., atthe next
Court of Quarter Sessions, of the county of D., and not depart
the court without leave, &e.
S. B., of the township of G., farmer, } Each tent. in $200,
er,
T. C., of ——_——_--,, storekee that the defendant
shall appear at the next Court of Gatton Sessions, of the
county of D., and not depart the court, &c., and in the mean-
time keep the peace, &c.
Returned to December Sessions.
Aqvicultural Societies.
Act 26 Aprin 1883. Purd. 90.
Szor. 1. The board of managers or executive committee of any agricultural or
horticultural society of this state, ig hereby authorized to appoint as many citizens
of this state, policemen, as shall be necessary for their exhibitions, whose duty it
shall be to preserve order within and around the grounds of said society ; protect
their property within said grounds; to eject all persons who shall be improperly
within the grounds of said society, or who shall be guilty of disorderly conduct,
or who shall neglect or refuse to pay the fee or observe the rules prescribed by
said society. Said policemen shall have the same power, the time said exhibition
shall continue, that a constable may have by law, in serving criminal process and
making arrests, and in addition, may arrest any person for the commission of any
offence, mentioned in section two.
Sror. 2. Any person who shall wilfully injure or destroy the property of exhibi-
tors, visitors or lessees, on the fair grounds, or shall hinder or obstruct the officers
and police in their duties, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon con-
viction shall be subject to a fine not less than one, or more than twenty-five dollars,
or imprisonment not exceeding thirty days, at the discretion of the court before
whom the offender may be tried.
By the act of 1st May 1879, the provisions of the 1st and 2d sections of the act of
1820, against horse-racing, are not to apply to agricultural societies offering premiums
for trials of speed in horses, walking, trotting and pacing, nor trials of speed in
horses in any incorporated driving park.’
A provision in the charter of an agricultural society, forbidding any person to
open any lot, stable, &c., for the purpose of receiving for pay, horses, vehicles, &c.,
within three hundred yards of the grounds of the society, during the continuance
of the fairs, and imposing a penalty for each day’s violation of the act, is unconsti-
tutional, as interfering with the use of private property, and granting an illegal
monopoly. It is not a public franchise.?
An agricultural society may place seats upon a part of its grounds, and charge
an additional price therefor, and remove therefrom a ticket-holder who has not paid
for their use, after making known to him the regulation ; but they are not justified,
in such case, in removing him from the grounds.®
1 Purd. 988, note r. 2 13 Bush 210. 8 7 Langs. 145.
[ 156 ]
Amendment,
At any time before judgment, the proceedings may be amended by the justice,
on application, and calling on the opposite party to show cause why the applicant
should not have leave to amend. Amendments are liberally admitted, where the
justice of the case requires them, and no injury is thereby inflicted on the adverse
arty.4
; The writer, as a justice of the peace, has always allowed the plaintiff to amend
his claim, and the defendant his set-off, when, in the progress of a suit, they have
thought it proper and for their interest so to do. If, on a second hearing, the
plaintiff or defendant brings an attorney to the office of the justice, and he sees
cause to object to the manner or amount of the claim, as made by his client and
entered on the docket, the writer has always allowed the attorney to amend the
claim, and has made the docket-entry to conform to the amended claim.
The act of 1806 gives to either of the parties to a suit in a court of record the
right to amend, at any time on or before the trial, any informality which will affect
the merits of the cause in controversy. And although the provisions of this act
are applicable only to actions in courts of record, yet the proceedings of justices of
the peace are clearly within its spirit ; and the decisions of the courts in reference
to it, should guide the justice in allowing or refusing amendments in analogous
cases.
Where an amendment is asked for with a view to some unfair advantage, such
as throwing on the plaintiff the burden of proving a fact not previously in issue,
&v., it ought to be refused. In strictness, leave to amend ought never to be
granted, unless the application be supported by affidavit that it will affect the
merits, and is not desired for any other reason.?, No amendment can be allowed,
the effect of which is, either to introduce a new cause of action, to deprive the oppo-
site party of any valuable right, or injuriously to affect the intervening rights of
third parties?
On appeal from the judgment of a justice, the right to amend does not depend on
the statutes of amendment, but upon the act of 1810, the 4th section of which
provides, that “the cause shall be decided by the court on its facts and merits
only; and no deficiency of form or substance in the record or proceedings returned,
nor any mistake in the form or name of the action, shall prejudice either party in
the court in which the appeal shall be made.’ And therefore, a declaration
in assumpsit may be amended by changing it into debt; the only requirement is,
that the cause of action remain the same.6 This power has long been exercised, on
the ground that forms of action are not prescribed in the law giving jurisdiction
to justices, and it would be unwise to require adherence to them.® “ Justices of the
peace,” said Chief Justice Gibson, ‘‘are not familiar with technical distinctions ;
and it would be monstrous, to suffer an error in the style of the action, to deprive
a party of his appeal.’
A party may amend as often as is necessary, the statute having fixed no limits to
the number of amendments.* All amendments made, either by consent or leave
of the justice, should appear on the record?
The question of making amendments in the names of the parties to a suit has
already been treated of, under the title “ Abatement” V. And to this the reader
is referred for the statutes and decisions upon the subject,
127. & H. Pr. 2 2190. 6 32 Sm. 147.
221 Penn. St. 474, 7178. &R.141, And see 1 Wood. 48.
8 105 Ibid. 96. 8168. & R.117.
4 Purd. 1141, 9 1 Dev. & Bat. 4,
5 32 Sm. 144,
[ 157 J
Of Appeals
From Magistrates to the Court of Common Pleas.
An essay on he right of appeal, and the manner in which that right may be waived, defeated or
enforced.
E1ruer party to a civil action, if dissatisfied with the judgment of an alderman
or justice of the peace against him to an amount exceeding five dollars and thirty-
three cents, or on the award of referees to an amount exceeding twenty dollars, has
the right to have it reviewed by the court of common pleas of the proper county by
APPEAL, a mode by which the facts and merits of the case, as well as the law, may
be re-examined by another tribunal.?
The first point to be determined by the dissatisfied suitor is, whether his case
entitles him to an appeal. And here it may be proper to consider from what judg-
ments an appeal will lie. An appeal lies from a judgment on a seire facias ;? and
from a judgment by confession.’ But no appeal lies from a regular judgment of
nonsuit.* If, however, the justice enter a compulsory nonsuit, which he has no
power to do, or dismiss the case in any other irregular manner, the plaintiff may
appeal; for such disposition of the case is equivalent to a judgment that he has no
cause of action.’ No appeal lies by either party unless the judgment operate
directly against him to a greater amount than the sum to which the right of
appeal is limited.6 And accordingly, the court of common pleas of Philadelphia
county have decided, that in an action before a justice to recover a penalty, not
exceeding five dollars and thirty-three cents, for the breach of a municipal ordi-
nance, no appeal lies: under the seventh section of the act of 15th April 1835,"
a judgment for a less amount is final, as in an action on a contract.? But the act
of 17th April 1876 provides, that either party may appeal from the judgment of a
magistrate, or a court not of record, in a suit for a penalty, to the court of common
pleas in which such judgment shall be rendered, upon allowance of said court, or
any judge thereof, upon cause shown, and upon such terms as to payment of costs,
and entering bail, as the judge or court allowing the appeal shall direct. In this
act there is no limitation as to the amount of the judgment.” Ifthe parties agree
that there shall be no appeal, the court will enforce that agreement by dismissing
an appeal if made ;“ such agreements, however, must be in writing.” The right
of the parties to appeal from the judgments of justices, in actions of trespass and
trover, under the act of 22d March 1814, is the same as in other cases,”
If the plaintiff's demand do not exceed five dollars and thirty-three cents, the
judgment of the justice is final as to him, and no appeal lies; and so if the case
has been submitted to referees, and the plaintiff's demand do not exceed twenty
dollars, he can have no appeal. If, however, the sum sued for by the plaintiff,
and set forth in the docket of the justice, is reduced by the judgment more than
five dollars and thirty-three cents (or on an award of referees, more than twenty
dollars), an appeal lies for the plaintiff, although the judgment is for a less sum
than five dollars and thirty-three cents."® The amount actually passed upon by the
justice regulates the plaintiff's right of appeal.® If the justice decide in favor of
1 A defendant, who is a mere stakeholder, is
not bound to appeal from the judgment of a jus-
tice, but must allow a party interested to use his
name for that purpose, upon security to indemnify
him against costs being given or tendered to him,
within the time allowed for an appeal. 4 Clark
37.
2358. & RB. 93.
8 25 Penn. St. 409.
41 Phila. 580.
5 2 Penn. St. 89. 17 Ibid. 75.
6 3 Penn. BI. 213. 3 Penn. L. J. 386.
T Purd. 1128.
§ Northern Liberties ». Powers, MS.
9 Purd.1142. This act was passed to carry out
the constitutional provision contained in art. V-
14,
et It has been held, that under this act an
allocatur is required, even when the penalty ex-
ceeds $5.33. 2 Del. Co. R. 333.
128. &R.114. 8 W. 372. 2 Bro. 99. 1 Ash.
92.
2758. & R. 366.
18 4 Thid. 72.
14 2 Ibid. 463. 12 Ibid. 385. 3 P. & W. 174.
16 12S. & R. 388. 3 Penn. St. 454.
16 11 Penn. St. 410. 485. & R. 72. 12 Ibid
385. 9 W.17.
158 APPEALS.
a set-off claimed by the defendant, exceeding five dollars and thirty-three cents,
the plaintiff can appeal, without regard to the amount of his. demand. ;
The defendant’s right of appeal depends on the amount adjudicated against him.
It is the sum in controversy and not the amount of the judgment, that regulates
the right of appeal; and therefore, if the defendant demand or offer to set off a
sum, exceeding five dollars and thirty-three cents, and the decision of the justice
be against the defendant on the set-off, he is entitled to an appeal ;? but it must be
a bond fide claim to set off. By the third section of the act of March 20th, 1845,4
“the right of appeal from judgments of aldermen and justices of the peace, and
from their judgments on awards of referees, is extended to defendants in all cases
wherein, by existing laws, the right of appeal is enjoyed by plaintiffs.” Under
this act, if the plaintiff be entitled to an appeal, in consequence of his demand
being reduced more than five dollars and thirty-three cents, the defendant has the
same privilege, although the judgment actually rendered be for less than five dol-
lars. This act gives to the defendant an appeal where the plaintiff may have one,
but it does not extend the plaintiff’s right; and, consequently, where previously
the plaintiff had no right of appeal, this act does not confer such right on the
defendant. Thus, where the plaintiff’s claim before the justice was for twenty-five
dollars, and referees awarded him eleven dollars, it was held, that the defendant
had no right of appeal under this act.®
The right to an appeal having been ascertained, the appellant, or person dissatis-
fied with the judgment, must take with him, or send to the magistrate, a competent
person to serve as bail, and claim his appeal. This must be done within twenty days
from the day on which the judgment was entered. In computing the twenty
days, the day of judgment is to be excladed;’ and if the twentieth day fall on
Sunday, or any legal holiday, the appeal may be entered on the next day.®
Where an appeal does not lie, no waiver will give jurisdiction; but where an
appeal does lie, the party may, by treating it as regularly in court, waive a defect
that would otherwise be fatal.2 Therefore, where a defendant appealed from a
judgment against him, for five dollars, the court dismissed the appeal, although
more than two years had elapsed, and the plaintiff had filed a declaration and
entered a rule to plead.”
If the justice, by mistake, refuses an appeal, it may be subsequently entered,
after the twenty days." But it is too late to enter an appeal, after the money is
made on an execution, although within the twenty days.”
The entry of a rule to show cause why the judgment should not be opened, after
the expiration of the twenty days, does not give the right of appeal, on the discharge
of the rule.* But if such rule be entered within the twenty days, it extends the
time for entering an appeal.“ And where, after the final hearing of a case before a
justice, he postpones his decision without fixing any day, the judgment entered by
him afterwards can only be regarded as a judgment from the day notice thereof
shall be given to the party against whom judgment is rendered, and he has twenty
days after the receipt of such notice to enter his appeal.
Where bail is entered on the twentieth day after the judgment, which was
excepted to after the twenty days, and new bail was given on the day after the
exception, the appeal was held to be good."* If the party be prevented from com-
plying with the requisitions to obtain an appeal, by the conduct or default of the
magistrate, the court will permit the appeal to be made after the expiration of
the twenty days, and the transcript to be filed after the first dav of the term." If,
2 W. 304. 20 Penn. St. 469.
3 P.& W.120. 2 W. 304. A magistrate refusing to permit bail to be
7 ee St. 78-9. entered for an appeal from a judgment rendered
urd. 1139. by him, denies the appeal itself. 1M. 210. But
ice 410. he is not liable to an action for damages for re-
id. 340. fusing an appeal ; the remedy is by aa to:
1
2
8
‘
51
8 2
38. & KR. 496, 29 Penn. St. 525. 8 Phila. the court to allow an ape 2 Luz. L. Obs. 321,
3
”
n
a's Pe Will: 4 Pen Sasi Axiom ware Be”
act 20 June 1883, Purd. 2007. 14 2 Ash. 224. 38 Penn. St. 211,
948,&R.190. 17 Penn. St. 89. 1Ash.168. 1 2 Clark 318 ee
19 Northern Liberties v. Crooks, Com. Pleas, 16 | Ash. 47, .
Phila. Dec. 1848. MS. And see 3 Am. L.J.361. 17 Ibid, 380,
APPEALS, 159
the magistrate erroneously reject an appeal offered within the twenty days, he
may, after their expiration, correct his mistake, and the appeal will be good. But
if one of the parties makes the magistrate his agent, and intrusts it to him to
enter a appeal for him, he is barred by the magistrate’s neglect, and loses his
appeal.
The first section of the act of 20th March 1845,8
be taken : it provides that it “shall be bail absolute
of costs accrued and likely to accrue, with one or
tioned for the payment of all costs accrued or that may be legally recovered against
the appellants.” The act of 15th March 1847, directs that “when any corporation
municipal corporations excepted) being sued, shall appeal or take a writ of error,
the bail requisite in that case shall be taken absolute for the payment of debt,
interest and costs, on the affirmance of the judgment.” The act of 21st March
1849,° provides “ that in all suits or actions hereafter to be brought in any court of
record of this commonwealth, against any foreign corporation or body corporate not
holding its charter under the laws of this commonwealth, every judgment, verdict
and award rendered against such corporations, shall be final and conclusive, unless
the said defendants, in addition to the usual proceedings in cases of appeal, shall
give good and sufficient bail, in the nature of bail absolute, for the payment of such
sum or sums as shall finally be adjudged to be due to the plaintiff or plaintiffs,
together with interest and costs thereon.” And by act of 15th April 1851, this
provision is extended to stage companies, and to all joint-stock companies not
incorporated, when the members of said companies do not reside within the com-
monwealth. :
The act of 20th March 1845 does not include municipal corporations.’ They
are entitled to an appeal without the entry of bail® So also, executors and admin-
istrators, by the fourth section of the act of 1810,® and guardians, by the act of
27th March 1833, may appeal without security. But since the passage of the act
of 12th July 1842, which supplies the acts which exempted females from impri-
sonment for debt, it is necessary that a female should give the bail required by the
act of 1845, to obtain an appeal.
When a party desires to appeal, the magistrate prepares the recognisance briefly
on his docket, under the entries of the previous proceedings in the case. It is suffi-
cient to state that A. B. is held to the plaintiff in a certain sum, “ conditioned that
the appellant shall appear at the next court of common pleas and prosecute his appeal
with effect, &c.,” which recognisance the court will consider as if it had been drawn
at length, under the act of March 20th, 1845." Or, it may state that A. B. is held
to the appellee in a certain sum, double the probable amount of costs accrued and
likely to accrue, ‘‘ conditioned that the appellant shall pay all costs accrued, or that
may be legally recovered against him.” If the recognisance be not drawn by
the justice, and returned to the court substantially like the forms above given, the
appeal may be dismissed. ;
A penalty and a condition are indispensable to constitute a recognisance ;¥ hence,
where one was taken thus—‘ A. B. enters special bail, &c., for stay of execution,
&c., according to law,” it was adjudged to be void; the sum could not be supplied
by reference to the debt and costs at the date of the recognisance, because it ought
regulates the bail which shall
in double the probable amount
more sufficient sureties, condi-
1168. & R. 421.
22 W.72. See 2 Wood. 470. A magistrate,
in no possible ‘case, should act as the agent
of either party. How can any man receive such
an appointment, such a mark of confidence, with-
out his mind being biassed in favor of the person
who bestows it? It is said to be no uncommon
thing for justices to undertake the collection of
debts for others, and to bring suits and enter
judgments, on their own dockets, in favor of the
persons by whom they have been appoiuted
agents, The report is mentioned in order to
accompany it with the information that the
supreme court has determined that such conduct
in an alderman or justice of the peace is a mis-
demeanor in office. 14 8. & R.158. In Wistar
v. Conroy, at June Term 1869, the court of com-
mon pleas of Philadelphia reversed the decision
of an alderman, in a landlord and tenant case, on
the ground that the magistrate had signed the
notice to quit, as the plaintiff's agent. And it has
been determined, that suit upon a promissory note
cannot be brought before a justice to whom it has
been indorsed for collection, as he thereby becomes
the plaintiff’s agent therefor. 49 Mich. 505.
8 Purd. 1139.
4 Ibid. 1140.
5 Ibid. 938.
6 Ibid. 792, note m.
71 Phila, 402.
86W.&S. 16.
9 Purd. 1139.
10 Thid.
UT Clark 501.
12 19 Penn. St. 358.
18 45 Penn. St. 276,
5 W. 333,
160 APPEALS.
to have been large enough to cover future costs; nor for that purpose could the
court assume that it had been taken in double the amount.? And the bail is not
liable beyond the amount of the penalty.” But a recognisance on appeal, where the
recognisor was “ bound as absolute bail in the sum of twenty dollars, or such sum
as may be necessary to pay all costs that have or may accrue in this case, in prose-
cuting this appeal,” was held sufficient.” After the defendant has had the benefit
of his appeal, an objection that the recognisance contained no penalty, will not be
allowed to prevail.4 Whenever a defect exists in the form of the recognisance, the
practice is, to apply to the court for a rule upon the appellant to perfect his appeal
within a given time, or show cause why it should not be dismissed. It would be
error to quash the appeal in the first instance.6 An objection to the form of the
recognisance will be waived by any step taken to prepare the case for trial. —
When bail is offered, it is the magistrate’s duty to inquire into its sufficiency,
either on oath or affirmation, or by other means. [If satisfied of the insufficiency
of the bail, notwithstanding his oath, he ought to be rejected. If the appellee, or
successful party, be dissatisfied with the bail, he may accept or object to him, and
insist on an inquiry into his circumstances, and may bring evidence to rebut his
allegations, and to prove (as is often the case) that he is not sufficient bail. New
bail may, however, be put in, after such successful opposition ; and in a case where
the bail was entered on the twentieth day after the judgment, which was excepted
to after the twenty days, and new bail was given on the day after the exception, the
appeal was sustained.’ Until the transcript is actually filed in the office of the pro-
thonotary, the magistrate retains the right to investigate and decide on the suffi-
ciency of the bail.6 Anda defendant cannot defeat the justice’s jurisdiction, by
filing the transcript, after notice given to him that bis bail is excepted to.? Where,
however, the common pleas is in possession of a case in the shape of an appeal,
although defectively entered, the functions of the justice terminate.”
It is not necessary that the appellant should join with the surety in the recogni-
sance." But the security must be given in a sufficient amount, as required by the
act of assembly ;% and it must appear from the record that the security was given
according to law.” An appeal by one of two defendants is good as to the one who
appeals, although the other one comes into court and dissents.“
If execution had been issued before the entry of bail, the perfecting of an appeal
will entitle the appellant to a supersedeas ; which it will be the duty of the justice
to issue, on being satisfied that the appeal has been filed in court. But the entry
of bail for an appeal, though it may stay the immediate execution of the process,
will not avoid all that has been done under it; in order fully to supersede the
execution, it is necessary to perfect the appeal by bringing it into court.® It is the
province of the justice to determine whether the appeal be regularly taken; and
if he allow it, and grant a supersedeas, the constable cannot refuse to recognise
it, on the pretence that the justice committed an error; if he persist in proceeding
in the execution, he is as much a trespasser as if he had no process in his hands;
pee a pmnslianer under such superseded execution will take no title to the goods
sold.
In Philadelphia, where the defendant is the appellant, it is required by the act
of 27th March 1865, that he, or some person acting in his behalf, having knowledge
of the facts of the case, should, in addition to the entry of bail, make oath or
1 11 Penn. St. 293. 52P.& W.431. 5 W. & 8.363. 11 Penn
212. & W.9. 1 Phila. 27, 11 Penn. St.293. St, 336. 57 Ibid, ’ Phila. 331 :
3 14 Penn. St.158. In an action against acon- Int. 79. scsi sss ea
stable for a false return, © recognisance in the 6 11 Penn, St. 336,
following words, “defendant gives bail, whioh is T 1 Ash. 477.
ontered on the docket, for the sum of $100, J. W. 8 6 Penn. St. 194,
B., bail,” cannot be supported as a recognisance 9 1 Ash. 80.
of bail for an appeal. 35 Penn.St. 276. But if 2 Ibid. 168.
the dodket-entries, though slovenly made up, fairly 1 6 Binn, 52.
show that an appeal was entered, the recognisance 1215. & R. 491
will be binding. 38 Ibid. 500. 51 Ibid. 85. A 18 3 Thid. 93 :
recognisance, though informal, is sufficient, if it 1 1 Ibid. 192
eens Hpi ne epee shall proseoute his 5 1 Ash. 408 :
appeal with such effect, as that no costs shal 16 :
See aes aes Aa 1 be Be og v. Farrell, Purd. 1132, note d. 29 Penn.
4 22 Penn. St. 53. 1 27 Penn. St. 199.
APPEALS. 161
affirmation, to be filed with the alderman, that his appeal is not intended merely for
the purpose of delay, but that if the proceedings appealed from are not removed,
he, or the defendant, will be required to pay more money, or receive less than
is justly due; which affidavit must be attached to the transcript, by the alderman, to
be filed in the court to which the appeal is taken’ This extends to appeals under
the landlord and tenant act of 1863.2. The affidavit must be made at the time of
entering the appeal.’ It is the duty, however, of the justice to inform the appellant
that an affidavit is requisite to perfect his appeal.*
Where the judgment is rendered for wages of manual labor, the act of 20th
April 1876 provides, that before the defendant shall be entitled to an appeal, he, or
his agent or attorney, shall make oath or affirmation that the appeal is not intended
for the purpose of delay, but that he believes that injustice has been done him;
which affidavit shall be attached to and sent up with the transcript of appeal. And
the said defendant shall be required to give good and sufficient bail for the payment
of the debt and costs, to be paid when finally adjudged to be due to the plaintiff by
the court, in all cases for labor. Notwithstanding the general terms of this act, it
has been determined, that an administrator can appeal without affidavit or security.®
Payment of the accrued costs is not essential to an appeal under this act;’ and
defects in the appeal may be remedied, by leave of court, as in other cases.* The
act does not embrace a suit by an attorney for professional services ; they are not
wages of labor® Nor watching timber at an annual salary.”
Caution is requisite in ascertaining to what term the appeal must be filed or entered.
Many appeals have been quashed in consequence of ignorance or inadvertence on
this point; and common prudence requires either the employment of counsel at this
stage of the case, or the procuring of information from the magistrate on this point.
Tt may be thus explained: there are, for example, four termsin the year, to some
one of which the appeal must be entered. The first Monday of the monthsof March,
June and December, and the first and third Monday of September are, in Philadel-
phia, the return-days of those terms. In calculating the twenty days allowed for an
appeal, care must be taken lest one of those return-days should intervene. If the
bail have been entered previously to such return-day, the transcript must be filed
on or before such return-day, or the appeal will be lost. For, though the law
gives twenty days for entering the bail for an appeal, and the appellant may take it
on the twentieth day, notwithstanding the beginning of a term hath intervened since
the judgment; yet, if the appeal be actually completed on the magistrate’s docket,
and ready for return, the appellant is bound by law to file it on or before the first
or return-day of the neat term after the entry of bail, though the twenty days may
not have then expired." If, therefore, the appellant finds that a return-day inter-
venes within the twenty days, his safest course is to delay the entry of bail, and
defer the filing of the transcript in the prothonotary’s office until the then next
ensuing term, a period of three months. But a defective appeal may be withdrawn,
and other bail entered within the twenty days, though a return-day has intervened.
By the act of Ist May 1861, it has been provided, that appeals by defendants, in
Philadelphia, shall be filed on or before the next monthly return-day ensuing the
entry of the alderman’s judgment.”
The act of 1810 provides, that “the whole proceeding in case of appeal, shall be
certified to the prothonotary of the proper county, who shall enter the same in his
docket ; and the suit shall from thence take grade with, and be subject to the same
1 Purd, 1141. See ante, p.121,asto the con- New York, it has been held, that where the time
ditions of appeal in certain other counties.
23 W.N. C. 325,
87 Phila. 392.
42 Kulp. 369.
§ Purd. 2074.
6100 Penn. St. 506.
78 Luz. L. Reg. 32%
825 Pitts. L. J. 120.
92 Luz. L. Reg. 216.
102 Kulp 360. See 2 Chest. Co. R. 63.
13 ~P. & W. 416.
12 12 Penn. St. 363. And see 1 Leg. Gaz. 85. In
11
prescribed by statute for the allowance of an
appeal has elapsed, the court has no power to
order it to be allowed as of the preceding term.
92 N. Y. 319. And Judge Conyngham decided,
that where the time within which an appeal is
required to be entered, is fixed by statute, the
court had no power to lengthen the period. 2 Luz.
L. Obs. 194.
18 Purd.1142. See 10 Phila. 80. 1 W. N.C.
64. Ibid. 134. 4 Ibid. 543, And see act 9 April
1862, as to the filing of appeals in Delaware
county. Pamph. 347. And act 6 April 1870, aa
to Venango county. Pamph. 931.
162 APPEALS.
rules as other actions, where the parties are considered to be in court,” ree the
appeal is filed, the proceedings in court are de novo, or new, only as to the ye o-
tion, pleadings and evidence, all of which are matters not within the scope of this
work. ‘The cause of action must, however, continue the same as before the magis-
trate ;? and nothing can be recovered before the court which conld not have been
recovered before the justice, except the intermediate interest. The form oF
action may be changed on an appeal, provided the cause of action remain the same.
Where a plaintiff appeals from the decision of a justice, he cannot discontinue the
appeal, so as to authorize him to proceed on the original judgment before the mag-
istrate; such discontinuance isa disclaimer of his right to sue, and an absolute
bar to further proceedings in the cause. , :
As to the costs on an appeal, they abide the event of the suit, and are paid by the
unsuccessful party, ‘as in other cases,” subject to these exceptions. If the plain-
tiff appeals, he pays all the costs on the appeal, if he recovers no greater sum, or
no more favorable judgment in court than had been rendered by the magistrate.
If a defendant recover judgment before the justice for a sum certain, and the
plaintiff appeal, and the award of arbitrators in court be “no cause of action,
neither party is entitled to recover costs.’ And so also, if, in such cases, there be
an award in court in favor of the plaintiff, from which the defendant appeals, and
afterwards obtains a general verdict, judgment must be entered for the defendant,
with the costs of suit only which accrued before the appeal from the justice? In
each of these cases, the plaintiff obtains a more favorable judgment, by relieving
himself from the payment of the sum adjudged against him by the justice, and is
therefore not liable to pay the costs of the appeal; but being unsuccessful in the
result of the suit, he is not entitled to recover them.
With regard to a defendant, if, either on the trial before the magistrate, or before
referees, or before appeal taken, he offers to the plaintiff a judgment for the amount
admitted to be due, which offer “ it shall be the duty of the justice or of the referees
to enter on the record,” and the plaintiff rejects the offer; then the plaintiff shall
pay all the costs which accrue on the defendant’s appeal, if the plaintiff shall not
recover eventually ‘a greater amount than that for which the defendant offered to
give a judgment.” In both cases, the defendant’s bill is to be taxed and paid
by the plaintiff in the same manner as if a judgment had been rendered in court for
the defendant.? This proviso has no application, where the appeal is taken by the
plaintiff.
To exempt a defendant from the payment of costs, and to entitle him to recover
them from the plaintiff, where the plaintiff is the successful party, it is necessary
that the defendant should have offered, either at the trial of the cause before the
justice, or before the appeal was taken, to give the plaintiff a judgment for a sum
equal to, or greater than that which the plaintiff, in the event of his suit, reco-
vered ; and it is the duty of the justice to enter such offer on the record If tke
justice neglect to enter such offer upon his docket, he may be answerable to the de-
fendant for any loss or injury sustained by reason thereof.% His certificate
that such offer was made is not sufficient ; it must be made a part of the record.¥
The offer to confess judgment, in order to have the effect of exempting the defend-
ant from the costs of an appeal, must be made before the appeal is taken; an offer
made afterwards, although before the justice has made out his transcript, is too
_jate* It may be made at any time before the appeal is taken, although the plain-
tiff is not present; but he should have notice to accept or refuse the amount
tendered.* And it may be made by the defendant’s agent, in his absence.’®
A tender before the justice of a sum of money equal to the amount recovered, is
not equivalent to the tender of a judgment, and consequently, will not exempt the
defendant from the payment of the costs on the appeal.7_ Neither will a tender of
! Purd. 1140. 10 29 P.
21Binn. 219. 3 Ibid. 43, uy hae ii
2108. & R. 227, 2 Thid. 15. Ibid. 43,
2W. 14. 1R. 370, 32Sm. 144, 147, 18 12 [hid. 255.
+ 3W.46, 10 Penn, St. 70, M 1 Ibid. 188
STW & 8. 813, 16 6 W. 494,
2 Ibid. 36. 18 48 Penn. St. 127,
® 6 Ponn. St. 463, 1 4 W, 389
® Purd. 1140. rote
APPEALS. 163
a sum equal to that ultimately recovered, together with the costs which have
accrued before the justice, avail the defendant; nothing but an offer to give
a judgment for the amount will be sufficient.1 But to entitle the plaintiff to recover
costs, where a judgment has been tendered, he must recover a greater sum than
that tendered, with the interest added.?
In the counties of Allegheny, Berks, Blair, Cambria, Centre, Chester, Clinton,
Cumberland, Indiana, Lancaster, Lebanon, Lehigh, Luzerne, Mifflin, Northampton,
Northumberland, Perry, Schuylkill and York, the appellant is required, by
statute, to pay all the costs that have accrued before the justice, at the time of
getting his transcript of appeal; unless he make affidavit, to be filed with the justice,
of his inability to do so. This, however, does not debar him of his right to recover
them back from the appellee, if otherwise entitled to do so?
In all cases of summary conviction, before a magistrate or court not of record,
either party may, within five days after such conviction, appeal to the court of
quarter sessions of the county in which such magistrate shall reside, or court
not of record shall be held, upon allowance of the said court of quarter ses-
sions, or any judge thereof, upon cause shown; and either party may also appeal
from the judgment of a magistrate or a court not of record, in a suit for a penalty,
to the court of common pleas of the county in which said judgment shall be ren-
dered, upon allowance of said court or any judge thereof, upon cause shown:
Provided, That all appeals from summary conviction and judgments for penalties,
shall be upon such terms as to payment of costs, and entering bail, as the court or
judge allowing the appeal shall direct.‘
It seems, that the limitation of five days in this act only applies to cases of sum-
Inary conviction ; not to suits for penalties.S Where the penalty has been paid, the
only remedy is by certiorari.®
1 4 Whart. 78. and to Monroe county by act 10 May 1871, Pamph,
2 39 Penn. St. 111. 692; and act 7 February 1873, Pamph. 126, se
3 See ante, p. 120. And see.act 22 March 1869. to Armstrong, Clarion, Delaware and Lawrence
Pamph. 478, as to Westmoreland county; act 4 counties.
April 1870, Pamph. 928, as to Juniata county, * Act 17 April 1876. Purd. 1142.
which was extended to Adams, Beaver and Frank- 5 2 Del. Co, R. 333.
lin counties, by act 14 March 1871, Pamph. 347, 6 28 Pitts. L. J. 446.
{ 164 ]
Apprentices.
ticeship. XI. Form of a warrant against a master.
IL of the ue i a XII. Warrant for an apprentice.
i i the XIII. Recognisance to be taken of the master to
III. Of the authority and duties of - (oa ec cmeidnt mele by AT
master. :
. Of th dies for misconduct, apprentice. : :
oo Of abecbaaliig apprantiogs: XIV. ere of an apprentice to give
VI. Of the assignment of an indenture. evidence.
VIL. Of the pindiag of poor children. XV. Docket-entry in case of master and ap-
III. Of entices generally. prentice. ; ;
. IX. Gonmplaing of ae appriadioe XVI. Assignment of an apprentice, to be written
X. Notice to the master. on the back of the indenture.
I. Or THE CONTRACT OF APPRENTICESHIP.
APPRENTICES are a species of servants, and are usually bound for a term of years,
by deed indented, or indentures, to serve their masters, and be maintained and
instructed by them.
Apprenticeship is a contract entered into between a person who understands some
art, trade or business, called the master, and another person, during his or her
minority, who is called the apprentice, with the consent of his or her parent or next
friend, by which the former undertakes to teach such minor his art, trade or busi-
ness, and to fulfilsuch other covenants as may be agreed upon ; and the latter agrees
to serve the master during a definite period of time, in such art, trade or business.
The time during which the apprentice is to serve is also called his apprenticeship.”
But the apprentice is not only a species of servant ; he is also aspecies of relation.
The law of England, as well as that of Pennsylvania, considers the master as stand-
ing in the place of the parent, who, for a certain length of time, has devolved many
of his duties upon the master, from whom the law, if called upon, will exact their
discharge. It will also exact from the apprentice, in all places, and at all times,
during his apprenticeship, that obedience and respect to his master, which it exacts
from a son to a father. ;
The obligations which exist between master and apprentice are various and of
great importance, not only to the parties, but to the public. ‘‘ Apprenticeships,”
says Blackstone, ‘‘ are useful to the commonwealth by the employing of youth, and
learning them to be early industrious.” As well, he might have added, as by the
instruction given to him while he is an apprentice, so that he shall, when free—
that is, when the period for which he shall have been bound apprentice shall have
expired—be found not only in habits of industry, but thoroughly instructed, and
skilful in executing the various branches of the trade or mystery to learn which he
had been bound apprentice. ‘ Indentures of apprenticeship,” says Judge Reed,
“Care personal contracts, authorized by law, in which the conditions and terms are
expressed. Any violation of these terms renders the aggressor liable, either to a
suit at law or to a summary process provided in our acts of assembly.”
_ The act of 28th April 1876 provides, that any person who shall, either in an
individual capacity, or as a member of any association, attempt, by any unlawful
means whatever, to prevent any mechanic, employer or person having charge of any
manufacturing business, from taking as an apprentice any minor whose parents or
guardians are desirous of apprenticing said minor, or where such minor is without
parents or guardians and desires to apprentice himself or herself, shall be guilty of
a misdemeanor; and on conviction thereof in the proper court of quarter sessions,
shall be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding one hundred dollars, or to imprison-
ment not exceeding three months, or both, or either, at the discretion of the court+
II. OF vee mnpEnrurs.
_ The act of 27th March 1713 provides, that “the justices of the orphans’ courts
in the respective counties, shall have full power and authority, at the instance and
1
: : Pe 5 tom of apprenticeship has nearly gone out of use;
Pape out 9, the relation of master and apprentice was one
; » Bl. 207. of the most valuable relations in society.” Arnold,
Purd.119, “ Tt is to be regretted that the sys- J., 41 Leg. Int. 115.
APPRENTICES. 165
request of executors, administrators or guardians, to order and direct the binding
or putting out of minors, apprentices to trades, husbandry or other employments, as
shall be thought fit; provided that the said courts shall not have power to bind
such minors, apprentices to any person or persons, whose religious persuasion
shall be different from what the parents of such minor professed, at the time of
their decease, or against the minor’s own mind or inclination, so far as he or she
has discretion or capacity to express or signify the same ; or to persons that are not
of good repute, so as others of good credit, and of the same persuasion, may or
ean be found.”
The act of 29th September 1770 provides, that “ all and every person or persons
that shall be bound by indenture to serve as an apprentice in any art, mystery,
occupation or labor, with the assent of his or her parent, guardian or next friend,
or with the assent of the overseers of the poor, and approbation of any two justices,
although such persons, or any of them, were or shall be within the age of twenty-
one years, at the time of making their several indentures, shall be bound to serve
the time in their respective indentures contained, so as such time or term of
years of such apprentice, if a female, do expire at or before the age of eighteen years,
and, if a male, at or before the age of twenty-one years, as fully to all intents and
purposes, as if the same apprentices were of full age at the time of making the said
indentures, any law, usage or custom to the contrary notwithstanding.”?
No agreement will constitute an apprenticeship, unless there are indentures
executed? A writing without seal is not an indenture of apprenticeship, within
the meaning of the act of assembly, even though signed by the parties The
indenture must be executed by the minor, as well as by the master and parent or
next friend, and if executed by the minor alone, it is not binding.5 An indenture
by the master and parent, but not by the infant, will render the master liable to the
apprentice, on the covenants therein, if he have complied with the terms of service
on his part.6 A minor in the service, of another, under a parol contract of appren-
ticeship, has a right to leave such service during his minority, and thereby terminate
the relation.*. An indenture of apprenticeship made in another state, is not obli-
gatory in Pennsylvania® Parol evidence of an indenture, not produced, is not in
general admissible ;® unless under particular circumstances.”
An indenture to serve merely, but without learning any art, trade, occupation or
labor, is not valid, either at common law or under the statute." The intention of
the law is to place the apprentice in a position in which he may make a livelihood;
and that while he works to increase the wealth of his master, he shall gather that
stock of knowledge which may be useful to him in after-life ; a minor must, there-
fore, be bound to some useful employment, at which he may in after-life make his
living? The terms servant and apprentice are not synonymous ;* and the courts
have always frowned upon every attempt to bind them out as servants.* Buta
binding as a waiter is good :® and a girl may be bound to learn the art, trade and
mystery of a housewife.® So, a father may bind out his son to serve three years as
asweep.” A written agreement “to remain with A. B. two years, for the purpose
of learning a trade,” is not binding, for want of an engagement in the same instru-
ment, by A. B., to teach® An infant under seven years may be bound apprentice
under the statute nial .
A mother, although married to a second husband, is a parent within the meaning
of the act, and may as such, independently of her husband, give assent to an inden.
1 Purd.117. The power to direct the binding, § 4 W. 80. 1 Ash, 123.
out of minors is expressly reserved to theorphans’ © 5 Penn. St. 269.
courts by the act of 29 September 17703 5. 1 7 18 Conn. 337.
Sm. 311. 86S. & R. 526.
2 Purd.118, By the common law, after arriving ® Burr. 8. C. 735,
at full age, a man may bind himself apprentice, W Thid. 151.
as he may enter into any other legal covenant, and 1 2 Dall. 197. 1 Y. 233.
be bound for its fulfilment. But a person of full 1% 1 Bouv. Inst. 160-61.
age, binding himself to learn a trade, is not sub- 18 3 R. 307.
ject to the provisions of the act of assembly 1 Ash. 268. 4 Clark 440.
giving summary jurisdiction in disputes between 15 18. & R, 252. iL
master and apprentice. 1 Bouy. Inst. 162, 1 Bro. 36 1Bro. 197. See 6 W. N. C. 2:
374, 2 Ibid. 205. VW Ibid. 275.
3 Burr. S. 0. 540. Ibid. 272, 290, 839.5 T.R.153. 18 3 C. & P. 289.
4108. &R. 416. 99 Penn. St. 108. 19 5 Whart. 128.
166 APPRENTICES.
ture. An indenture of apprenticeship is not necessarily invalid, because the
father of the child is in full life, and the binding made without his consent; a
mother may bind the children of an habitual drunkard, found so by inquest.’ But
the assent of the mother is not sufficient, where the father is living with her at the
time of the binding? If, however, the father, from drunkenness, profligacy or
other cause, shall neglect or refuse to provide for his children, the mother of such
children is authorized by the act of 4th May 1855, to bind them apprentices, with-
out the interference of her husband, and to exercise all the rights, and to be entitled
to claim, and be subject to, all the duties reciprocally due between a father and his
children; but if the mother be of unsuitable character to be so intrusted, the
proper court may appoint a guardian to perform such duties.* .
Where the parent of a child lives at a distance, and has long relinquished its
protection, a binding by the next friend is good.* It is not necessary that the
person who acts as newt friend to the minor, should receive an appointment as
such from legal authority. A sister may act as next friend, though a feme covert,
and the binding be to her own husband ;’ and so maya half-sister ;° but a minor
sister is incompetent. The person who acts as next friend need not be a relative,
but must be some one who knows and acts for the best interest of the minor, and
this may be shown by the terms of the indenture ; therefore, an indenture executed
by one, as next friend, who had but a casual acquaintance with the minor, did not
consult him as to the binding, or make the contract, but executed it at the request
of the master, and which contained no provision for schooling, was held invalid.?¢
The master to whom the child was formerly bound, is not a proper next friend
within the meaning of the act. Where a stranger, having no authority over the
minor, undertakes to bind him as an apprentice, the contract is not valid, at com-
mon law, as to either of the parties.!?
The general practice is, for the next friend of a minor to express his assent, by
sealing the indenture; but it has never been supposed, that he thereby rendered
himself liable on the covenants of the indenture.*
A binding to a feme covert is void, although the husband may have given his
assent to it; for, not being a party to the indenture, he is not responsible on the
covenants.“ An indenture executed by one of two partners on behalf of the firm,
is invalid ;* and so is an indenture which does not contain a covenant to give the
‘apprentice a reasonable education ;° unless it should appear that the education of
the apprentice had been sufficiently attended to before.
An indenture of apprenticeship binding a boy for a term of years, during which
the master, in lieu of the common covenants for boarding, &., agreed to pay him a
certain sum per week, during at least nine months in each year, was held valid."
And where, by the terms of an indenture, the master covenauted to pay to the father
of the apprentice, a certain weekly sum “ towards the support of the said appren-
tice,” it was held, that the master was bound to make the weekly payments to the
father, during the sickness of the apprentice, and whilst he was unable to work for
the master.” The master stands in loco parentis, and is bound by his contract to
support the apprentice in sickness.” An agreement by an apprentice, indorsed on
the indentures, that the wages shall be paid to the mother, cannot be enforced,
where there is no correlative obligation on her part for his maintenance.?!
An indenture binding the apprentice to learn the trade, art and mystery of stove-
moulding, wherein the masters covenanted, “at such times as their foundries
168. 4& RB. 340. 1B. 195. Phila. fs i
ee re ee Randall, J. 2 Chit. R. 284, 1 Bouv.
Ps 8 W. & 8. 339. 1 Pears. 30. 16 1 Bro. app’x, 73.
eee 16 Bright. 189. 8 Phila. 375. See act 17 March
ae ees 1865, infra, as to indentures in Philadelphia and
oh. 27, Allegheny.
T1R191. WTR. 191,
Back a - 2 Penn, St. 402.
i Corfield vo, Fi 7 i
10 Com. v. Schwartz, Com. Pleas, Phila, 19 1845, Se eran i seems Elena BE Bee Ut Wea,
ano ve ho s. p. 8 Phila. 375, 20 Q. S. Phila., 13 Oct. 1848, Parsons, J. 1 Str.
Gap oe 99. 1 Bott 574. Chitty on Apprentices 73, 104.
‘ 3 1 Bouy. Inst. 164. 1 Pars. on Cont. 534. And see
18 1K.191. 2 Ibid. 269. 7 Penn. St.21, 13 68. & R. 568.
Ibid. 90. a7 ~p
14 Com. ex rel. Kelley v. Medwinter, Com, Pleas, erg
APPRENTICES. 167
shall be in blast,” to give the apprentice employment, and to pay him $3.50 per
week, for the time he shall be so at work, for the first three months ; for the first
eleven months thereafter, one-half of journeyman’s prices by the piece; for the
next fourteen months, five-eighths of journeyman’s prices by the piece; and for
the balance of his term, at the rate of three-fourths of journeyman’s prices by the
piece; with a proviso, that the master should not be responsible for any acts done
or committed by the apprentice, during such times as he was not at work, nor were
they to be under any expense for medicines or medical attendance, it being fully
understood that the said apprentice was under the guardianship of his mother, and
containing no provision for schooling, was held to be void as an indenture of
apprenticeship.’
The act 17th March 1865, however, provides, that in the city of Philadelphia,
and the county of Allegheny, no indenture of apprenticeship shall hereafter be
cancelled, or deemed void, by reason of the want of any covenant on the part of
the master, to assume the guardianship of, or to school or educate the apprentice :
Provided, It shall appear on the face of the indenture of apprenticeship, that said
apprentice had arrived at the age of seventeen years, at or before the execution
thereof; or in case said apprentice should not have reached said age, that satisfactory
proof was given to the magistrate, at the time of binding, that the apprentice has ,
received such an education, in reading, writing and arithmetic, as to render further
schooling unnecessary ; nor shall any such indenture be deemed void, by reason of
any covenant, on the part of the master, to pay a certain sum, from time to time,
to the father, mother, guardian or next friend, of said apprentice, or to said appren-
tice alone, in case of the decease of the father or mother, in lieu of the maintenance,
clothing and medical expenses of said minor, or that the care, guardianship or main-
tenance of said minor, was committed to the father, mother, guardian or next friend
or some near relation of said minor, when not employed by his or her master, in and
about his work.?
Where the terms of the indenture required the apprentice to make up time lost
during the term of service, it does not mean time lost by reason of the partial
suspension of the company, whereby there was no work for the apprentice to do,
though ready and willing.*
III. OF THE AUTHORITY AND DUTIES OF THE MASTER.
To enable the master to compel the apprentice, if necessary, to do his work in a
proper manner, and in sufficient quantity, and to perform his other duties, he is, by
acts of assembly, by common law, and by the general custom of trade, armed with
no ineonsiderable authority. The apprentice and his interests are also specially
regarded, and in the same way provided for.
By the indenture, the master is vested with the authority, and, during the appren-
ticeship, assumes the responsibility and takes the place of the parent. This view
of the relationship between a master and his apprentice is of more importance than
persons are in the habit of considering it, and would, if properly regarded, give rise
to the cultivation of the kindest feelings, and the promotion of the best interests of
the parties. :
The master should never forget, that besides being bound to teach the apprentice
his trade, he has taken upon himself, for a time, the obligations of a father, and the
apprentice should always regard him in that character; such recollections and
feelings would be of incalculable value to them both. Magistrates are frequently
called upon to give advice to both masters and apprentices. It is a good rule always
to require to see the indenture between the parties, before any advice shall be given,
either to the one or to the other.
A master may, by law, correct and chastise his apprentice for neglect or other
misbehavior, so that it be done with moderation ;* but he cannot depute another
to give such correction.® If death ensue in consequence of such reasonable correc-
tion, without fault on the part of the master, it will be no more than accidental death;
but if the correction exceeded the bounds of due moderation, either in the measure
1 Com. v. Bowen, Q. §. Phila., Oct. 1863. 4 Finch 57. 1 Bl. Com. 428. 1 Bouv. Inst, 165,
2 Purd. 119. 8 2 Bache 134. Warren’s Blackstone 361.
3 104 Penn. St. 26.
168 APPRENTICES.
of it, or in the instrument made use of for that purpose, it will be either murder in
the second degree, or manslaughter, according to the circumstances of the case.
Thus, where a master struck a child, who was his apprentice, with a great staff, it
was ruled to be murder.?- And where a master had employed his apprentice, to do
some work in his absence, and on his return found it bad been neglected, and there-
upon threatened to send the apprentice to the House of Correction, ito which the
apprentice replied, “ I may as well work there, as for such a master ;” upon which
the master struck the apprentice on the head with a bar of iron, which he had in
bis hand, and the apprentice died of the blow; it was held murder: for if a father,
master, or school-master, correct his child, servant or scholar, it must be with such
things as are fit for correction, and not with such instruments as may probably kill
them; and a bar of iron is not an instrument of correction.? The master is not
liable for an unjust punishment, arising from an error of judgment ; but if he inflicts
punishment for the purpose of gratifying a cruel and revengeful disposition, and not
for the correction and reformation of the apprentice, it is an abuse of his power, and
in such case, if he be indicted for an assault and battery, his authority as master
will be no protection* It is the duty of the master, at all times, to attend to the
deportment of the apprentice and to restrain him from vicious courses ; and if that
were otherwise, the authority of the parent or guardian would supervene.®
A master has no right to require menial services from his apprentice; and if he
forcibly compel the apprentice to render such menial services, it will be a sufficient
ground for annulling the indenture ; he is not, however, liable to indictment for every
mistaken exercise of his authority. Neither parent, guardian nor master have the
right to exercise any arbitrary control over an infant, as to his religious principles.
But if a master, while his apprentice is of tender age, sends him to the church
himself and family attend, he “discharges his duty towards his apprentice,” within
the meaning of the act of assembly. The master cannot take the apprentice out
of the state where the indenture was executed, unless the indenture gives such
power, or it follows from the nature of the mystery which the apprentice is to
learn.®
Where an apprentice is bound to a master to learn a trade, the master is bound
to teach him the whole of that trade in all its branches ; and the keeping of an ap-
prentice to a subordinate branch, however such division of labor might expedite and
perfect the whole work, when completed, is a violation of the master’s covenant,
and a sufficient cause for cancelling the indenture.? Thus, if the master ceases to
carry on a part of the trade which he covenanted to teach the apprentice, he, by his
own act, makes it impossible for the minor to serve him after the manner of an
apprentice ; and he cannot be heard to complain that the apprentice has not done
that which he has wilfully made it impossible that he should do.? The master, how-
ever, is not bound to disclose to the apprentice secrets which are peculiar to himself,
and which are his exclusive property, unless by his covenant in the indenture he
has agreed to do so, or such agreement may be presumed from the circumstances.”
IV. OF THE REMEDIES FOR MIscoNDUCT.
_If any master or mistress shall misuse, abuse or evilly treat, or shall not discharge
his or her duty towards his or her apprentice, according to the covenants in the
indentures between them made; or if the said apprentice shall abscond or absent
him or herself from his or her master’s or mistress’ service, without leave, or shall
not do and discharge his or her duty to his or her master or mistress, according te
his or her covenants aforesaid, the said master, or mistress, or apprentice, be’ ~
_ aggrieved in the premises, shall or may apply to any one justice of the peace °” any
county or city where the said master or mistress shall reside, who, after giving uotice
to such master or mistress, or apprentice, if he or she shall refuse or neglect to appear
shall thereupon issue his warrant, for bringing him or her, the said master, mistress
Forst. P. C, 262. 1 Russ. Cr. L. 670, 7 3 Clark 49,
4
1
2 : \
: i pee oe ord . 8 6 Binn. 202. 1 Bouv. Inst. 165.
: uss. Cr. L, , ® Com. v. Aitken, Com. Pleas, Phila, 22 Dee.
: pe es i, 108, 1845, Jones, J : :
2 Penn. St. 402, 10 6B h. 42 i
6 4 Clark 440, 1 Btu Uauden ee Oat
\
APPRENTICES. 169
or apprentice, before him, and take such order and direction between the said mas-
ter or mistress, and apprentice, as the equity and justice of the case shall require ;
and if the said justice shall not be able to settle and accommodate the difference and
dispute between the said master or mistress, and apprentice, through a want of con-
formity in the master or mistress, then the said justice shall take a recognisance
of the said master or mistress, and bind him or her over to appear and answer tke
complaint of his or her said apprentice, at the next county court of quarter sessions
to be held for the said county or city, * * * and take such order with respect to
such apprentice as to him shall seem just; and if, through want of conformity
in the said apprentice, he shall, if the master or mistress, or apprentice, request it,
take a recognisance of him or her, with one sufficient surety, for his or her appear-
ance at the said sessions, and to answer the complaint of his or her said master or
mistress, or commit such apprentice, for want of such surety, to the common jail
or workhouse of the said county or city respectively ; and upon such appearance of
the parties, and hearing of their respective proofs and allegations, the said court
shall, and they are hereby authorized and empowered, if they see cause, to dis-
charge the said apprentice of and from his or her apprenticeship, and of and from
all and every the articles, covenants and agreements in his or her said indenture
contained, the said indenture of his or her said apprenticeship, or any law or cus-
tom to the contrary notwithstanding; but if default shall be found in the said
apprentice, then the said court is hereby authorized and empowered to cause,
if they see sufficient occasion, such punishment, by imprisonment of the body and
confinement at hard labor, to be inflicted on him or her, as to them, in their dis-
cretion, they shall think his or her offence or offences shall deserve.'
It is evident from the wording of this section, that on complaint being made,
“due notice’ must be given by the magistrate, to the party against whom the com-
plaint shall have been made. In the notice to be sent by the justice, the complaint
made should be stated, that the parties may come prepared; and a time and place
should be appointed when and where the parties shall appear. As such inquiries
usually make known some of the domestic concerns of the master’s family as well as
develop the feelings of those interested, and as the magistrate has the appointment
of the time, it is recommended that it should always be that time when the least
possible number of uninterested persons may be expected to be present. The office
of the justice is doubtless the proper place of inquiry. If the party notified shall
neglect or refuse to appear, at the time and place stated in the notice, and the ser-
vice of the notice shall be proved to the satisfaction of the magistrate, then, but
not till then, he shall “issue his warrant.”
Where it is shown that the apprentice has been severely beaten, or ill-treated,
and the magistrate binds the master to appear “at the next county court of quarter
sessions, to be held for the said county or city,” in which he shall reside; applica-
tion is usually made to the justice, that in the mean time (between the binding over
and the meeting of the court) the apprentice shall be delivered over to, and remain
with, and in the care of, his parents, &.—not to be returned to his master until the
court shall have heard the case and taken order on it. For many and obvious rea-
sons, such applications should be discountenanced and refused, unless the beating
shall have been inflicted with an unlawful and dangerous weapon, or where from
habits of intemperance, or the violence and indulgence of his passion, the master
cannot, with safety, be intrusted with the apprentice. : : ;
As a general principle, it is improper to bind an infant in a recognisance, but in
this case the act makes it imperative on the magistrate to include the apprentice
in the recognisance with the surety for his appearance. The justice will observe
another peculiarity in the provisions of this section of the act of assembly in refer-
ence to the recognisance to be taken under it. ‘“ The master or mistress” 1s not
required to give any security for his or her appearance at court, except his or her
own recognisance. .
All other means should be tried before the apprentice shall be committed te
prison ; and when the necessity of the case closes every other door, care should be
2 Act 29 September 1770 3 3. Purd. 120. under this act; but where the indenture itself ie
Where an apprentice absconds, or the master intrinsically defective, the remedy is by Anbeas
ill-treats him, the proper mode of proceeding is corpus. 8 Phila. 375.
170 APPRENTICES.
taken to write on the commitment a request that he shall be kept by hiwself, and
not put in company with any other prisoner. Imprisonment, however, is by all pos-
sible means to be avoided. It is, and it should be, regarded as the last resort. It
stiematizes the boy; it sinks him in the opinion of others ; and, what is still worse,
it siaks him in his own cstimation. But if the master’s complaint be just, the court
ought to and will enforce the law, by confining the apprentice so long as may be
necessary to accomplish his reform.’ ; ; seth tesseee
The only punishment which the court is authorized to inflict, imprisonment of
the body, bears, in many cases, as heavily upon the master as upon the apprentice.
- The innocent is punished nearly as much as the guilty. It is when the indenture
is about to expire, that complaints multiply and assume a more serious character.
The apprentice has acquired, or thinks he has acquired, a complete knowledge of
his trade; his desire to become free becomes more and more ardent, as be calcu-
lates, from week to week how much money he earns, or presumes he earns, for
his master ; all of which he thinks would be his own, if the indenture were at an
end. These thoughts, unjust and ungencrous as they are, are frequently fostered
by others, and beget a restlessness and dissatisfaction, which give birth to com-
plaints and inquiries before the courts. The result of such inquiries, however they
may affect the interests of the master, fall but lightly on the apprentice. If
default shall be found in him, the only punishment by law to be inflicted is “ im-
prisonment,” by which the master loses all the money which the apprentice would
have earned, during the term of the imprisonment; and the law provides no
remuneration whatever.
The court will discharge an apprentice for acts of the master injurious to his
mind and morals? In many indentures provision is made that the master shall pay
to the apprentice, his ‘‘ parent, guardian or next friend,” a certain sum of money
periodically, for clothing, &e. And it has been repeatedly ruled, that the refusal
or neglect of the master to make the payments required, at the times stipulated, is
such a breach of the covenants of the indenture, as warrants the discharge of the
apprentice.
After the acquiescence of the parents for several years in the binding of a child,
there must appear to be a palpable violation of the law, to induce the court to annul
the indentures.* The court will not cancel an indenture, upon the application of the
master, on the ground that the apprentice’s health is so bad, that he is unable to
work, and consequently an expensive burden upon the master. The master stands
in loco parentis, and is bound by his contract to support the apprentice in sickness.
Otherwise, if the apprentice join in the application.‘ But if the boy plainly appear
to be an idiot, incapable of learning his trade, the court will discharge the indenture.®
And the court will discharge the apprentice, if the indentures have been procured
by fraud or collusion.®
An appeal does not lie from an order of the court, discharging an apprentice,
pursuant to statute.’
V. OF ABSCONDING APPRENTICES.
If any apprentice of any of the arts, trades, mysteries, occupations or labor
aforesaid, shall depart and abscond from his or her master’s or mistress’ service
into any other county of this province, or into the city of Philadelphia, it shall
and may be lawful to and for any justice of the peace of such county or city, to
issue his warrant to any constable within his county or city, to apprehend, take
and have the body of such apprentice before him, or some other justice of his
county; and upon such appearance, and hearing of the complaint and defence of
the parties, if default be found in the said apprentice, then, and in such case, the
said justice of the peace before whom such warrant shall be returned, shall commit
him or her to the common jail of the county, where his or her said master or
mistress shall reside, unless he or she will consent to return home, or shall find
1 41 Leg. Int. 115. 1 Bouv. Inst. 164. 1 Pars. on ©
f iy s . t. 534.
21 Bro. 24, 6 W.N.C. 214. 5 Shi : n Vont
83 Clark 49, ‘ an Chitty on Apprentices 105,
Q. 8. Phila., 13 Oct. 1848, Parsons, J. 1 Str. 711 Mass. 24. 1 Bai
99. 1 Bott 574. Chitty on Apprentices 73, 104, Ne eee
APPRENTICES. 171
sufficient surety to appear at the next sessions, to be held for the county where such
master or mistress shall reside, and answer the complaint of the said master or
mistress, and not to depart the same without leave,
This section of the act, if construed strictly and to the letter, would appear to
give no authority to a justice of the peace ‘to issue his warrant” for any abscond-
ing apprentice, so long as he continued “in the county or city”? where his master
or mistress may reside. Time and long practice, however, have given a different
construction to the section, and the magistrates in every part of the state, on the
oath of the master or mistress that his or her apprentice has absconded from their
service, issue a warrant for his apprehension, without inquiring whether the appren-
tice has or has not “gone into any other county or city.” Any other construction
than this would give facilities to runaway apprentices, which would be greatly
injurious to the public interests as well as to those of the master or mistress, and
consequently to those of the apprentice.
If any apprentice shall absent himself or herself from the service of his or her
master or mistress, before the time of his or her apprenticeship shall be expired,
without leave first obtained, every such apprentice, at any time after he or she
arrives to the age of twenty-one years, shall be liable to, and the master or mistress,
their heirs, executors or administrators, are hereby enabled to sustain all such
actions and other remedies against him or her, as if the said apprentice had been
of full age at the time of executing his or her indenture of apprenticeship.?
If any person or persons whatsoever shall harbor, conceal or entertain any such
apprentice, knowing him to be such, during the space of twenty-four hours, without
his or her master’s or mistress’ consent, and shall not give notice thereof to his or
her said master or mistress, every such person or persons offending in the premises,
shall pay to the said master or mistress the sum of twenty shillings, for every day
he shall so harbor, conceal or entertain such apprentice, to be recovered in a sum-
mary way, as debts under five pounds are by law directed to be recovered, if the
same shall not exceed five pounds ; if otherwise, to be recovered by action of debt,
to be brought at the suit of the party injured, in any court of the common pleas
within this province?
The gist of the offence in this case, is the knowledge of the party who shall
“conceal or entertain”? the apprentice of another. It is, therefore, indispensable
in the party who shall bring suit to recover damages, to be able to prove that the
person who concealed or entertained the runaway apprentice knew him to be such.
This act does not intend to make common charity a crime, or treat that man as
guilty of an offence against his neighbor, who merely furnishes food, lodging or
raiment to the hungry, weary or naked wanderer though he be an apprentice. The
harboring made penal by:this act requires some other ingredient besides a mere
kindness or charity rendered to the fugitive. The intention or purpose which
accompanies the act, must be to encourage him in his desertion of his master, to
further his escape, and impede and frustrate his reclamation. The meaning of the
words harbor and conceal are not synonymous ; there may be a harboring without
concealment.t If the amount claimed shall exceed five pounds, suit must be brought
in the common pleas. .
If an apprentice enlist in the army, the court will not, upon a habeas corpus,
issued at the relation of the master, remand the apprentice to his custody, if he be
unwilling to return, but will leave the master to his suit against the officer who
enlisted the apprentice. The habeas corpus act is intended to secure personal
liberty, not to decide disputes about property. .
If an apprentice abscond intg another state, he may be sent back to his master
under the provisions of the acts of congress, relating to fugitives from labor.®
No innkeeper or tavern-keeper shall receive, harbor, entertain or trust any person
under the age of twenty-one years, or any apprentice or servant, knowing him to
1 Act 29 Sept. 1770 33. Purd. 120. Ina pro- his master has not complied with his part of the
ceeding against an absconding apprentice, a peti- contract. 8 Phila. 455.
tion and answer are irregular; the case is to be 8 Act 29 Sept. 1770 2 4. Purd. 120.
heard, at the bar of the court, on the justice’s 44 Clark 111. 3 Am. L, J. 168. 1 Am. L,
transcript. Com. v. Bowen, Q.S. Phila. Oct. 1863. Reg. 142. 2 Wall. Jr. C. 0.311. Ibid. 324. i
2 Act 11 April 179991. Purd. 120, Thelaw °158.& R. 353. 7 Penn. L. J. 283 77. R.
will not sustain an apprentice in absconding 745.
whenever he may fancy he is ill-treated, or that 6 1 Am. L. Reg. 654.
172 APPRENTICES.
be such, or after being warned to the contrary by the parent, guardian, master or
mistress of such minor, apprentice or servant, under penalty, for the first or second
offence, of three dollars, over and above the forfeiture of any debt contracted by
such minor, apprentice or servant, for liquors or entertainments; and for the third
offence, under penalty of fifteen dollars, and the forfeiture of his license, and being
for ever incapable of receiving a license to keep a public inn within this common-
wealth.
VI. OF THE ASSIGNMENT OF AN INDENTURE.
When any master or mistress shall die before the term of apprenticeship shall be
expired, the executors or administrators of such master or mistress (provided the
term of the indenture extend to executors and administrators) shall and may have
aright to assign over the remainder of the term of such apprenticeship to such
suitable person, of the same trade or calling, mentioned in the indenture, as shall
be approved by the court of quarter sessions of the county where the master or
mistress lived, and the assignee to have the same right to the service of such
apprentice as the master or mistress had at the time of his or her death ; and also,
when any master or mistress shall assign over his or her apprentice to any person
of the same trade or calling mentioned in the indenture, the said assignment shall
be legal, provided the terms of the indenture extended to assigns, and provided the
apprentice, or his or her parent or parents, or guardian or guardians, shall give his,
her or their consent to such assignment before some justice of the peace of the
county where the master or mistress shall live.?
The consent of the parent or guardian, as well as that of the apprentice, is neces-
sary to an assignment of an indenture.* It must be certified by the justice, or
expressed in writing before him, and attached to the instrument at the time of the
assignment.*
An indenture binding an apprentice to a man, his heirs and assigns, without
naming executors, cannot be assigned by his executors. And where an appren-
tice was bound to two copartuers, or the survivor of them, and in case of dissolution,
he was to have the right to elect which of the partners he would serve; and on a
dissolution, one of the partners assigned -to the other all his interest in the inden-
tures, the court held, that to make the election of the apprentice valid, it must be
done with the consent of the parent or guardian, and that the dissolution abrogated
the indenture, the parent not consenting to the election.®
VII. OF THE BINDING OF POOR CHILDREN.
It shall be lawful for the overseers of every district, with the approbation and
consent of two or more magistrates of the same county, to put out as apprentices all
poor children whose parents are dead, or, by the said magistrates, found to be unable
to maintain them, so as that the time or term of years of such apprenticeship, if
a male, do expire at or before the age of twenty-one years; and, if a female, at or
before the age of eighteen years.’
The word “ district,” in this act, shall be construed to mean “ township,” and
“borough, and every other territorial or municipal division, in and for which officers
charged with the relief and support of the poor are directed or authorized by law to
be chosen; but nothing in this act contained shall be taken to repeal or otherwise
interfere with auy special provision made by law for any city, county, township
borough or other territorial or municipal division.’
By the act 24th March 1877, the directors of almshouses are empowered to bind
1 Act 11 March 1834 3 21. Purd. 120,
2 Act 11 April 1799 22. Purd. 120.
818.& RB. 248.
43 Ibid. 158.
54 Tbid. 109. 1 Bouv, Inst, 162,
nae 405. 1 Bouv. Inst. 162. See 22 L.
T Act 13 June 1836 2 8, Purd. 117. They oan-
not bind outa child that has grand-parente of
ability to maintain it. 8 Pitts. 129. It is not
necessary that the infant should join in the in-
denture. 38. & R.158. But in such case, the
remedy for a breach on the part of the master, is
by action of assumpsit. 8 W. N.C, 433. They
have no power to bind outa child that has not
become chargeable to the public. 1 Pears. 30.
In Philadelphia, under the Act 15 March 1828
@ 15, the guardians of the poor have authority
to bind out a child who has received publio as-
sistance from their out-door officers, though not
a the almshouse or children’s asylum. 38 Clark
§ Act 13 June 1836
45, Purd. 1704.
Leg. Gaz. 333. ‘
See 7
APPRENTICES. 178
out apprentices, so that such apprenticeship may expire, if males, at and before the
age of twenty-one, if females, at or before the age of eighteen years: Provided,
That no child be bound out for a longer time than until he arrives at the age of
eighteen years, unless he be bound out toa trade other than a farmer: Provided
also, That no child shall be apprenticed without the limits of the state.
All corporations, organized under any general or special law of this common-
wealth, for the purpose of providing homes for friendless or destitute persons or
children, shall be, and are hereby authorized to receive such children, upon inden-
ture from the guardians, overseers or directors of the poor of any municipality ; and
also to bind out and provide suitable homes for all children committed to their
charge, when maintenance is unprovided for by their parents or guardians?
The managers of the house of refuge are empowered by statute, in their discre-
tion to bind out children under their charge, with their consent, as apprentices,
during their :inority, to such persons and at such places, to learn such trades and
employments as in their judgment will be most conducive to the reformation
and amendment and will tend to the future benefit and advantage of such children’
They may be bound to citizens of other states, with their own consent. And they
may reclaim such children, if it shall appear, on complaint before a judge of the
court of quarter sessions, that the agreements made on their behalf have been vio-
lated, or that they have been neglected or improperly treated.
By act 27th February 1847, orphans admitted into the Girard College are directed
to be bound to the corporation of the city of Philadelphia, who are authorized to
bind them out as apprentices, on their arrival at the age of fourteen years.®
‘VIII. OF APPRENTICES GENERALLY.
The relation of master and apprentice, until dissolved by the quarter sessions,
cannot be questioned in a suit by the master for harboring his apprentice, under
the act of 1770.7. An apprentice cannot maintain an action against his master for
extra work done by him for the latter, during the term of apprenticeship, although
the work was done upon the express promise of the master to pay for it. But an
apprentice is an operative within the meaning of the 5th section of the bankrupt
law of 1841; and where a master, before his bankruptcy, made an express promise
to pay his apprentice for all over-work, the court directed the assignee to pay him
accordingly ®
An indenture of apprenticeship may be vacated by the consent of all parties to it.1°
An apprenticeship is determined by the death of the master :" unless the indenture
be to executors and administrators.2 And it may be put an end to by the master
telling his apprentice ‘‘he might go where he pleased,” and giving up his indentures."
IX. CoMpLAINT OF AN APPRENTICE.
A. B., the.apprentice of C. D., of the county of E., carpenter, personally appears this
day, July 5th, 1879, and makes complaint—that his master has severely beaten him with
a large stick of wood—(or that his master does not furnish him with necessary food and
clothing)—(or, that G. H., a journeyman in the employ of the said C. D., is in the habit
of kicking and cuffing him)—(or that G. H., a journeyman in the employ of the said C. D.,
is in the habit of getting drunk and profanely swearing)—(or that he has otherwise
refused or neglected to fulfil the covenant of the indenture between them).
(Signed,) A. B.
Before J. B., Justice of the Peace, July 5th, 1879.
Any of which complaints being made, the justice should send a notice to the
master requiring his attendance at the office of the justice.
1 Purd. 95. 81 Whart. 113.
2 Act 25 May 1878. Purd. 118. 91 Clark 134.
: Pard, 998, 1001. : eeu ee Bouv. Inst, 166.
1d. . an. G .
6 Ibid. 12 See 1 Binn. 178. 48. & R. 109.
6 Pamph. 178. | 18 Burr. 8. C. 629.
73.W. &S. 178,
174 APPRENTICES.
X. Novice TO THE MASTER.
To CO. D., of the County of Erie. .
Sir:—Your apprentice A. B. has this day, July 5th, 1879, called at my office in F
township, in the said county, and made complaint that you have severely beaten him
with a large stick of wood—(or that you have neglected or refused to have him furnished
with sufficient wholesome food or clothing)—(or that G. H., a journeyman in your em-
ploy, is in the habit of kicking and cuffing the said apprentice)—(or that G. H., a journey-
man in your employ, is in the habit of getting drunk and profanely swearing, whereby
the life and morals of your said apprentice are endangered)—(or that you have neglected
to fulfil the covenants of the indenture between you). I appoint to-morrow, Tuesday,
the 6th of July, at 3 o'clock in the afternoon, to inquire into this complaint, at my office,
in the township of F., in the said county, at which ¢ime and place I request you will
attend, bringing with you the said A. B., and any other persons you may think proper,
that this complaint may be fully inquired into. :
Witness my hand and seal, at F. township, county of Erie, July 5th, 1879.
J. R. Justice of the Peace.
If such notice be neglected, and the master do not appear, the justice should
thereupon issue his warrant against the person or persons on whom it may have
been served, taking care to be well satisfied, on oath or affirmation, that the notice
has been served, before any other process shall issue.
XI. Form oF A WARRANT AGAINST A MASTER.
COUNTY OF CAMBRIA, ss.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To any Constable of the said county, greeting :
You are hereby commanded to take the body of [C.D.] if he be found in the said
county, and bring him before J. R., one of our justices in and for the said county, to
answer the commonwealth upon a charge, founded on the oath [or affirmation] of A. B.,
of having severely beaten the deponent, his apprentice, with a large stick of wood, and
further to be dealt with according to law. And for so doing this shall be your warrant.
Wirvess the said J. R., at E. township, in the said county, who hath hereunto set his
hand and seal, the [sixth] day of [July], in the year of our Lord one thousand eight
hundred and seventy-nine. J. R., Justice of the Peace. [sEau. |
The justice should state in the complaint those charges which may have been
made by the apprentice, and in his notice to the master he should communicate to
him the complaint actually made against him by his apprentice. The notice should
always correspond with the complaint, that the master may come prepared with such
witnesses as he may think necessary. The justice will observe that the variety of
complaints above made, and repeated in the notice, are only given to exhibit such as
may be and frequently are preferred, and that he may in all of them have a short
form as to the manner of noting the charge made in the complaint and notice, which
are always to be made in strict accordance with the statement of the apprentice and
with each other. It is unnecessary to multiply forms or notices, in order to exhibit
the difference between those which may be made against a mistress or against mas-
ters, from those against a master; the magistrate will be abundantly competent to
note such differences. Attention and some experience will be of much value in
these, as well as in all other matters which may come before him. Similar memo-
randa may be made and notices given in regard to complaints made by masters
against apprentices. When it becomes necessary to issue a warrant against an
apprentice, it may be in the following form:
XII. Warrant FoR AN APPRENTIOE.
COUNTY OF ERIE, ss.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To any Constable of the said county, greeting :
You are hereby commanded to take the body of [A. B.] if [he i i
county, and bring lee before J. R., one of our nie l a ee ae
answer the commonwealth upon a charge, founded on the oath [or affirmation] of c. D
of having absconded from the service of his master, the deponent], and further to be
dealt with according to law. And for so doing this shall be your warrant,
APPRENTICES, 175
Wirnzss the said J. R., at F. township, in said county, who hath hereunto set his hand and
seal, the [fifth] day of [July], in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred
and seventy-nine. J. R., Justice of the Peace. [SEAL.]
If it shall become necessary to bind the parties over to the next county court of
quarter sessions, recognisances should be taken, and a return made to the court. A
copy of the docket-entry of the magistrate will be a proper return to bring the
matter under the notice of the court. °
XIIL. REcoGNISANCE TO BE TAKEN OF THE MASTER TO ANSWER TO A COMPLAINT
MADE BY HIS APPRENTICE.
You, C. D., do acknowledge yourself to be indebted to the commonwealth in the sum
of $100, to be levied of your goods and chattels, lands and tenements, upon condition
that if you shall appear at the next Court of Quarter Sessions, to be held at ——, for
the county of , then and there to answer to a complaint made against you, of having
severely beaten your apprentice, A. B., and shall not depart the court without leave,
then this recognisance to be void, otherwise to be and remain in full force and virtue.
Are you content ?
A recognisance in the same form will answer, when the apprentice is to be bound
over to the court, with this difference, that he. should, beside his own recognisance,
give security for his appearance.
One party being bound over to answer to a charge, the person or persons who
have made the charge should be bound in recognisance to give evidence, at the
court, when the case shall come before it.
XIV. RECOGNISANCE OF AN APPRENTICE TO GIVE EVIDENCE.
You, A. B., do acknowledge yourself to be indebted to the commonwealth, in the sum
of $50, to be levied of your goods and chattels, lands and tenements, upon condition
that if you shall personally appear at the next Court of Quarter Sessions, to be held at
—, in and for the county of Erie, then and there, on behalf of the commonwealth, to
give evidence in the case of the Commonwealth vs. C, D., for severely beating you, and
shall not depart the court without leave, then this recognisance to be void, otherwise
to be and remain in full force. Are you content ?
A recognisance of the same kind will answer, when the master shall be required
to be bound over to give evidence.
XV. DocKET-ENTRY IN CASE OF MASTER AND APPRENTICE.
Commonwealth ) July 5th, 1879, A. B., the apprentice of C. D., the defendant, personally
vs. appears and makes complaint that his master has severely beaten him
C. D. with a stick of wood. Same day, wrote a notice to the defendant requir-
ing his attendance at this office, on the 6th of July inst., at 3 o’clock.
Notice served on oath by L. T., Constable. July 6th, defendant appears. A. B. sw.
Bail in $100 required from defendant, &c. CO. D., of H township, carpenter, bound
in $100 for his appearance at the next Court of Quarter Sessions to answer to the above
charge, &c. A. B. and P. Q., his guardian, each hound in $50 that the said A. B. shall
appear and give evidence in the above case at the next Court of Quarter Sessions, &c.
It has been already observed, that a copy of the docket-entry will make a proper
return to bring this complaint before the court ; the docket-entry should have the
following addition made at the foot of it before it shall be sent to the court.
I certify, that the above is a correct transcript of the proceedings had before me, in the
above case, as they are of record on my docket. : 3
Witness my hand and seal, at F—— township, in the county of Erie, this 10th day
of August, a. p. 1879. J. B., Justice of the Peace. [szau.]
XVI. AN ASSIGNMENT OF AN APPRENTICE, TO BE WRITTEN ON THE BACK
OF THE INDENTURE.
Know aut Men by these presents, that [, the within-named A. B., by and with the con-
sent of C, D., my within-named apprentice, and of E. F., his father, parties to the within
indenture (testified by their signing and sealing these presents), for divers good causes
176 , ARREST FOR DEBT.
nd considerations, have assigned and set over, and do hereby assign and set over, the
vita indenture, and the said C. D., the apprentice therein named, unto G. H., his
executors, administrators and assigns, for the residue of the term within mentioned,
he and they performing all and singular the covenants therein contained on my part to be
kept and performed. Awno I, the said C. D., do hereby covenant on my part, with the
consent of my father, the said K. F., faithfully to serve the said G. H., as an apprentice,
for the residue of the term within mentioned, and to perform towards him all and sin-
gular the covenants within mentioned on my part to be kept and performed. Awp I,
the said G. H., for myself, my executors and administrators, do hereby covenant to per-
form all and singular the covenants within mentioned on the part of the said A. B., te
be kept and performed towards the said apprentice. WurTness our hands and seals, at
——, in the county of Erie, the sixteenth day of August 1879.
Signed, sealed and delivered, pee 16th, 1879, A.B. [sgau.
before J. R., Justice of the Peace. C.D. [sean
E. F. [seat.
G. Hf. [spar
Arrest for Debt,
SINcE the passage of the act of the 12th of July 1842, the only civil cases in
which a justice of the peace can issue a capias or warrant of arrest, or an execution
authorizing the imprisonment of the person of the defendant, are trespass, trover,
or where it is proved by affidavit, that the plaintiff’s demand is for the recovery of
money collected by a public officer, or for official misconduct. That act provides as
follows:
‘‘ No person shall be arrested or imprisoned on any civil process issuing out of
any court of this commonwealth, in any suit or proceeding instituted for the reco-
very of any money due upon any judgment or decree founded upon contract, or due
upon any contract, express or implied, or for the recovery of any damages for the
non-performance of any contract, excepting in proceeding, as for contempt, to
enforce civil remedies, action for fines or penalties, or on promises to marry, on
moneys collected by any public officer, or for any misconduct or neglect in office,
or in any professional employment, in which cases the remedies shall remain as
heretofore.””!
“No execution issued on any judgment rendered by any alderman or justice
of the peace, upon any demand arising upon contract, express or implied, shall
contain a clause authorizing an arrest or imprisonment of the person against
whom the same shall issue, unless it shall be proved by the affidavit of the per-
son in whose favor such execution shall issue, or that of some other person, to
the satisfaction of the alderman or justice of the peace, either that such judgment
was for the recovery of money collected by any public officer, or for official mis-
conduct.’”?
‘“ No capias or warrant of arrest shall issue against any defendant in any case in
which, by the provisioas of the preceding action, an execution on the judgment
recovered could not be issued against the body; and whenever a capias or warrant
of arrest in such case shall issue, the like affidavit shall be required as for the
issuing of an execution, by the provisions of said section,.”’8
, ae shall reside out of this commonwealth, he may, upon giving
se i = . sey eee the payment of all costs which he may become liable
: P yy ie rahe . o ee ae judgment against the defendant, have
petit Oe i i oat all be eee to such writ, on making the
cae Sean. ae ae 7 y- rt section oe act, or a summons, which may
wera tei _ ne oe ta than four days from the date thereof.
arta ee ian wo days before the time of Xppearance mentioned
; same shall be returned, personally served, the justice or alder-
man issuing the same may proveed to hear and determi i
ne the ca
heretofore allowed by law.’"4 ener rae
1 Act 12 July 1842 2 1. Purd. 6”, 8 Thid. 22
2 Ibid. 9 23. Purd. 1130, ‘ Thid, ; ab, Ponds Hoe
4
= Re =
Swe +
= =
ARREST FOR DEBT. 177
If it appears upon the face of the record that the justice has exceeded his juris-
diction, by issuing process against the person of a defendant in a case in which such
process is forbidden by law, his proceedings will be considered a nullity, and the
defendant will be discharged on habeas corpus Thus, in an action for a penalty,
which is directed to be recovered “ as debts of like amount are by law recoverable,”
the defendant is not liable to arrest ; and an execution in such case, authorizing the
imprisonment of the person, is void, and the defendant may be relieved by a habeas
corpus.”
Where a plaintiff has an election to bring an action either ex contracté or ex
delicto, as in the case of a common carrier or other bailee, he cannot, by such election,
deprive the defendant of any substantial privilege or defence; and in such case the
defendant shall not be subjected to imprisonment in consequence of the mere change
in the form of action. But where the action is for a distinct tort, although one
deducible from the existence of a contract, if the plaintiff disaffirm the contract,
and proceed for the fraudulent or tortious conduct of the defendant, in such cases
bail may be demanded in the first instance. And where the action is in form ex
delicto, after judgment, an execution may issue against the body of the defendant.5
A justice of the peace has no power to issue a warrant of arrest, prescribed, in
cases of fraud, by the act of 1842.6 Nor can a judge of the common pleas issue
such a warrant on a transcript of the judgment of a justice filed for the purpose of
creating a lien.’ /
An arrest on civil process may be made on the return-day of the writ.2 But an
arrest after the time it is made returnable is a- trespass and void.?
The neglect of an attorney to pay over money collected for his client, is within
the exceptions of the act of 1842, and upon a judgment obtained for money so
collected, he may be arrested in execution.”
Women are not relieved from arrest for debt by the act of 1842, but by that of
8th February, 1819," which provides that no female shall be arrested or imprisoned
for or by reason of any debt contracted after its passage, and this provision is
re-enacted by the act of 13th June 1836, § 6.2 And consequently, an attachment
cannot issue against a female trustee to compel payment of the trust funds in her
hands; for such a process is but a civil writ of execution.”
1 1 Dall. 135. 1 2 Pars. 251.
2 Martin’s Case, Com. Pleas, Phila., 15 April 8 9 Johns. 117.
1854. And see 4 Y. 237, 240. 9 6 Mass. 22.
3 3 Clark 226. 1 Phila. 47. 6 W.N.C.300. 1 2 Gr. 60.
11 Ibid. 575. 11 Purd. 67.
4 Bright. 197. 11 W. N. C. 270. Ibid. 267. 12 Pamph. 573. Morris v. Hofheimer, Dist.
40 Leg. Int. 4. An infant may be arrested fora Court, Phila., 6 June 1860. 11 W. N.C. 341.
tort. Ibid. 46. 13-1 Ash. 373; contrd, 1 W. N.C. 250. See 1?
5 1 Clark 184. Ibid. 341. 103 Penn. St. 263,
6 1 Pitts. 180.
12
[178 ]
Arson.
i inst the accused.
I. Statutes relating to arson. IV. Warrant agains
II. What constitutes arson. V. Commitmeut for arson.
II. Information for arson.
I. Act 31 Maron 1860. Purd. 474.
Sxcr. 137. If any person shall, maliciously and voluntarily, burn or cause to be
burned, or set fire to, or cause or attempt to set fire to, with intent to burn, any
factory, mill or dwelling-house of another, or any kitchen, shop, barn, stable or
other out-house that is parcel of such dwelling, or belonging or adjoining thereto,
or any other building, by means whereof a dwelling-house shall be burnt, then and
in every such case, the person so offending shall be adjudged guilty of felonious
arson, and on conviction thereof, shall be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding two
thousand dollars, and to undergo an imprisonment, by separate or solitary confine-
ment, at labor, not exceeding twelve years. And in case of the malicious burning
or setting fire to any dwelling-house, or building that is parcel of such dwelling or
belonging thereto, there is any person in the same, the offender, being convicted
thereof, shall be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding four thousand dollars, and to
undergo an imprisonment, at separate or solitary confinement, not exceediag twenty
ears.
: Sucr. 138. If any person shall, wilfully and maliciously, burn or cause to be
burned, set fire to or attempt to set fire to, with intent to burn, or aid, counsel,
procure or consent to the burning or setting fire to, of any barn, stable, or other
building of another, not parcel of the dwelling-house, or any shop, storehouse or
warehouse, malthouse, mill or other building of another, or any barrick, rick or stack
of grain, hay, fodder or bark, piles of wood, boards or other lumber, or any ship,
boat or other vessel of another lying within any county in this state, or any wooden
bridge within the same, or state capital or adjoining offices, or any church meeting-
house, court-house, jail or other public building belonging to this commonwealth,
or to any city or county thereof, or to any body corporate or religious society what-
ever, the person offending shall, on conviction, be adjudged guilty of a misdemeanor,
and be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding two thousand dollars, and to undergo
an imprisonment, by separate or solitary confinement, at labor, not exceeding ten
ears.
Sucr. 139. Every person, being the owner of any ship, boat or other vessel, or the
owner, tenant or occupant of any house, out-house, office, store, shop, warehouse, mill,
distillery, brewery or manufactory, barn or stable, or any other building, who shall
wilfully burn or set fire thereto, with intention to burn the same, with an intention
thereby to defraud or prejudice any person, or body politic or corporate, that hath
underwritten, or shall underwrite, any policy of insurance thereon, or on any moneys,
goods, wares or merchandise therein, or that shall be otherwise interested therein,
shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and, on conviction, be sentenced to pay a fine not
exceeding one thousand dollars, and to undergo an imprisonment, by separate or
solitary confinement at labor, not exceeding seven years.
Sror. 140. If any person shall wilfully set on fire, or cause to be set on fire, any
woods, lands or marshes within this commonwealth, so as thereby to occasion loss,
damage or injury to anv other person, he or she shall be guilty of a misdemeanor,
and, on conviction, be seatenced to pay a fine not exceeding one hundred dollars,
and undergo an imprisonment not exceeding twelve months,
_ Secor. 141, If any person shall unlawfully and waliciously place or throw in,
a upon, against or near any building or vessel, any gunpowder or other explosive
aa with intent to do bodily harm to any person, or to destroy or damage any
uilding or vessel, or any machinery, working-tools, fixtures, goods or chattels, every
such offender shall, whether or not injury is effected to any person, or any damage
ae saben, es or machinery, working-tools, goods or chattels, be guilty of
y, , being thereof convicted, shall be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding
a, Ue ey te
ery
ARSON, 179
five hundred dollars, and to undergo an imprisonment, by separate or solitary con
finement at labor, not exceeding three years.
Aot 10 June 1881. Purd. 475.
Szor. 1. No principle or policy of law shall, because the defendant shall have
been in possession as tenant or otherwise, at the time of the commission of the
offence, exempt any person from conviction and punishment, who shall wilfully and
maliciously burn, or cause to be burned, or cause or attempt to set fire to, any
building ; but such person shall be liable to conviction and punishment, in the same
manner and to the same extent as if not in possession.
II. WHAT CONSTITUTES ARSON.
Arson, at common law, is the malicious, voluntarily and actually burning of the
house or out-house of another.! And this definition is followed by the act of 1860,
prescribing the punishment of arson. At common law, the burning of one’s own
property, unaccompanied by an injury to, or by a design to injure, some other person,
is pot a punishable offence.? But the burning of a man’s own house in a town, or
so near to other houses as to create danger to them is a great misdemeanor.®
The burning of a barn, with hay and grain in it, is felony and arson at common
law. If a building be set on fire which is so near a dwelling-house as to endanger
the burning of it, it is arson.5 A jail is an inhabited dwelling-house within the
statute.® Setting fire to a jail by a prisoner, merely for the purpose of effecting his
own escape, and not with an intention to burn it down, is not within the statute."
But if the prisoner intend to burn down the building, to effect his main design,
which is to escape, he is guilty.®
If any part of a dwelling-house, however small, be consumed by fire, maliciously
and wilfully applied, the offence of arson is complete.? In an indictment at com-
mon law it is unnecessary to allege that the house burned was a dwelling-house, for
the word “house” imports it. Setting fire to an unfinished boat in a shop, with
intent to burn the building, is a misdemeanor at common law.” It is an attempt to
commit arson, if the prisoner persuade another to do it, and give him the materials,
he himself not intending to be present.”
Such as be taken for house-burning, feloniously done, are not bailable by justices
of the peace.
IIT. INFORMATION FOR ARSON.
BERKS COUNTY, ss.
J. L., of the township of B——, in the county of Lancaster, yeoman, personally came
before J. R., one of the Justices of the Peace in and for the county of Berks, and made
oath, that on the night of the twentieth instant, between the hours of eight and twelve
of the clock, the barn of the said J. L., situated in B township aforesaid, containing
a large quantity of hay and grain, was entirely consumed by fire; that threats having
been made upon a former occasion by F. W., of L—— township, in the said county
of Lancaster, laborex, that he would do this deponent some mischief, and the said F. W.,
since the burning of the said barn, having left his usual place of abode in L. township
aforesaid, the deponent hath good cause to suspect, and doth suspect, the said F. W., of
setting fire to the said barn. Further saith not. J.
Sworn and subscribed, February 23d, 1879, before J. R., Justice of the Peace.
14 Bl. Com. 226, C. C. 550. 12 Ibid. 148. 15 Ibid. 75.
2 2 Pick. 325. Lewis’ Cr. L. 81. ~° 8 5 Ired. 350.
3 Lewis’ Cr. L. 79, 82. 2 East P. C.ch.21,27, 9 16 Mass. 105. 3 Ired. 570.
p- 1030. Cald. 227. 10 4 Call 109. See 103 Penn. St. 469, as to an
£5 W. & S. 385. indictment for burning a barn.
5 2 Rich. 242, 10 Met. 422. And see 98 Penn. 1 Thacher’s Cr. Cas. 240.
St. 192. 12 4 Hill 133.
6 18 Johns. 115. 4 Call 109. 18 2 Inst. 189. 2 Ash. 236. Purd. 546.
718 Johns. 115. 5 Ired. 350. And see 13 Cox
180 , ARSON.
IV. WARRANT AGAINST THE ACCUSED.
BERKS COUNTY, ss.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To the Constable of the Township of O——, in the County of Berks, greeting :
Wuereas, information hath been made unto J. R., one of the Justices of the Peace in
and for the said county, on the oath of J. L——, of the township of B., in the county
of Lancaster, yeoman, that on the night of the twentieth instant, between the hours
of eight and twelve of the clock, the barn of the said J. L——, situated in B-— — township
aforesaid; containing a large quantity of hay and grain, was entirely consumed by fire ;
and this deponent has good cause to suspect, and doth suspect, the said F. W. of settin
fire to the said barn; you are, therefore, hereby commanded forthwith to take the sai
¥, W., and bring him before the said J. R., to answer unto the said complaint, and fur-
ther to be dealt with according to law. Witness the said J. R., at the borough of R—,
in the said county of Berks, the twenty-third day of February, in the year of our Lord
one thousand eight hundred and seventy-nine. ;
J.R., Justice of the Peace. [szat.]
Return of Constable.—I have taken the within-named F. W——, whose body I have
ready, as within I am commanded. X. Y., Constable.
V. CoMMITMENT FOR ARSON.
BERKS COUNTY, ss.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To the Constable of O—— township, in the County of Berks, and to the keeper of the
common jail of the said county.
Wurrzas, F. W., of O—— township aforesaid, laborer, hath been brought before K-
M., one of the Justices of the Peace in and for the county aforesaid, charged on oath
of J. L., of the township of B——, in the county of Lancaster, yeoman, with having,
on the night of the twentieth instant, between the hours of eight and twelve of the
clock, set fire to the barn of the said J. L., situated in B township aforesaid, contain-
ing a large quantity of hay and grain, whereby the same was entirely consumed: These
are, therefore, to command you, the said constable, to convey the said F. W., forthwith,
to the common jail of the said county of Berks, and deliver him to the keeper thereof;
and you, the said keeper, are hereby commanded to receive the said F. W. into your cus-
tody, in the said jail, and him there safely keep until he be thence delivered by due
course of law. Witness the said K. M., at township aforesaid, the twenty-eighth
day of February, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and seventy-nine.
K. M., Justice of the Peace. [smat.]
The crime described in the 138th section of the Penal Code is a misdemeanor
only, which is triable in the court of quarter sessions; but that described in the
137th section, is a felony, of which exclusive jurisdiction is vested in the oyer and
terminer.!
1 2 Pitts. 310.
[181 ]
Assault and Battery.
I. Definition of an assault and battery.
II. What will justify a battery.
II, Provisions of the Penal Code.
IV. Complaint for an assault and battery.
V. Warrant for an assault and battery.
VI. Proceedings before the justice.
I. DEFINITION OF AN ASSAULT AND BATTERY.
WHAT IS DEEMED AN ASSAULT.—An assault is an attempt or offer, with force or
violence, to do a corporal hurt to another ; as, by striking at him with o. without
a weapon ; or presenting a gun at him, at such a distance to which the gun will
carry ; or pointing a pitchfork at him, standing within reach of it; or by holding
up one’s fist at him, or by drawing a sword or waving it in a menacing manner ;!
or by riding a horse so near to one as to endanger his person;? or by any such
like act done in an angry, threatening manner.’ But it seems agreed, at this day,
that no words whatever can amount to an assault ;* so, if a man raise his arm against
another, but accompany the action with words showing a determination not to strike,
it is no assault. And to present a gun within shooting distance of one who is
armed with a knife, and about to attack the defendant, is no assault, if there was
no attempt to use the gun, or intention to use it, unless first assailed.*
WHat IS DEEMED A BATTERY.—A battery, which always includes an assault, is
the actual doing an injury to the person of a man, be it ever so small, in an angry,
or revengeful, or rude, or insolent manner; or by spitting in his face, or violently
jostling him out of the way.” Thus, to attack and strike with a club, with violence,
the horse before a carriage in which a person is riding, is an assault on the person.®
And taking hold of a person’s coat, in an angry, rude or insolent manner, or with a
view to hostility and detaining the wearer, amounts not only to an assault, but to
a battery.®-
One charged with an assault and battery may be found guilty of the assault, and
yet acquitted of the battery ; but every battery includes an assault: therefore, on
an indictment of assault and battery, in which the assault is ill laid, if the defendant
be found guilty of the battery, it is sufficient.”
‘
II. WHAT WILL JUSTIFY A BATTERY.
If a person comes iato my house, and will not go out (after having been required
so to do), I'may justify laying hold of him, and turning him out, not using more
violence than is necessary to eject him from my premises. Thus, also, in the exer-
cise of an office, as that of churchwarden or beadle,a man may lay hands upon
another, to turn him out of the church, and prevent his disturbing the congregation.”
If an officer, having a warrant against one who will not suffer himself to be arrested,
beat or wound him, in the attempt to take him, he may justify it. So, if a parent,
in a reasonable manner, chastise his child, or a schoolmaster his scholar, or a jailer
his prisoner, or if one confine a friend who is mad, and bind and beat him, &c., in
such a manner as is proper in his circumstances, or if a man force a sword from one
who offers to kill another, or if a man gently lay his hands on another, and thereby
1 Bae. Abr.
3 3 Strob. 137.
8 1 Hawk. P.C.110. It isan assault to throw
a missile at the horse and driver of a vehicle,
though it only struck the horse, and the driver
was not injured. 8 Phila. 614.
#1 Hawk. P. C. 110. The presentation of a
pistol, and threatening to shoot, whilst commit-
ting a burglary, will sustain an indictment for an
assault, with intent to kill. 8 Phila. 612.
6818. & R. 347. See 2 Greenl. Evid. 3 8. 1
Cr. 0. 0.310. 3 Ibid. 435. 5 Ibid. 348. Itisa
criminal assault recklessly to discharge a pistol,
in a crowded car, though without intent to shoot
any person, if a passenger was wounded thereby.
100 Penn. St. 324; s. c. 39 Leg. Int. 32.
6 9 Ala. 79. It is an assault to resist or obstruct
a constahle making a distress for rent, though
his authority is only by parol. 8 Phila. 609.
7 1 Hawk P. C. 110.
81P. & W. 380. And see 8 Phila. 614,
9 Bald. 600. But it is not an assault and bat-
tery, to resist an officer making an arrest, without
warrant, for a misdemeanor not committed in his
view. 9 Phila. 595. :
10 1 Hawk. P. C.110. But one convicted of an
aggravated assault cannot be sentenced to im-
prisonment in the penitentiary, if no battery be
found. 3 Luz. L. Obs. 194.
ll Nels. tit. Assault.
182 ASSAULT AND BATTERY.
stay him from exciting a dog against a third person, if I beat one (without wound.
ing him, or throwing at him a dangerous weapon) who wrongfully endeavors, with
violence, to dispossess me of my lands, or the goods of another, delivered to me, to
be kept for him, and who will not desist upon my laying my hands gently on him,
and disturbing him, or if a man beat, wound or maim one who makes an assault
upon his person or that of his wife, parent, child or master, or if a man fight with,
or beat one who attempts to kill any stranger, if the beating was absolutely necessary
to obtain the good end proposed, or rendered necessary in self-defence—in all these
cases, it seems the party may justify the assault and battery.
It ig admissible for the defendant to show that the alleged battery was merely the
correcting of a child by its parent, the correcting of a servant or scholar by his
master, or the punishment of the criminal by the proper officer; but if the parent
or master chastising the child, exceed the bounds of moderation and inflict cruel
and merciless punishment, he is a trespasser, and liable to be punished by indict-
ment. The law confides to schoolmasters and teachers a discretionary power in the
infliction of punishment upon their pupils, and will not hold them responsible
criminally, unless the punishment be such as to occasion permanent injury to the
child, or be inflicted merely to gratify their own evil passions,?
III. PRovIsIoNs OF THE PENAL CODE.
Any person who shall be convicted of an assault and battery, or of an assault,
shall be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars, and undergo an
imprisonment not exceeding one year, or both, or either, at the discretion of the
court.
If any person shall unlawfully and maliciously inflict upon another person, either
with or without any weapon or instrument, any grievous bodily harm, or unlawfully
cut, stab or wound any other person, every such person shall be guilty of a misde-
meanor, and being convicted thereof, shall be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding
one thousand dollars, and to au imprisonment, either at labor by separate or solitary
confinement, or to simple imprisonment, not exceeding three years.‘
IV. CoMPLAINT FOR AN ASSAULT AND BATTERY.
MONROE COUNTY, ss.
Before me, the subscriber, one of the justices of the peace in and for the county of
Monroe, personally came A. B., of the township of S—, in the said county, yeoman,
who, upon his solemn affirmation, according to law, saith, that on Friday last, being the
fifth day of May, instant, at the township aforesaid, C. D., of the same township, currier,
made an assault upon this affirmant, and then and there did violently beat and abuse him,
and further saith not. :
Affirmed and subscribed, May 8th, a. p. 1879,
before me, J. R., Justice of the Peace. (Signed) A. B.
V. WARRANT FOR AN ASSAULT AND BATTERY.
MONROE COUNTY, ss.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To the Constable of the Township of S——, in the County of Monroe:
Wuereas, complaint hath been made before J. R., one of the justices of the peace in and
for the county of Monroe, upon the solemn affirmation of A B., of the i i
0 , t .B., township aforesaid
yeoman, that on Friday last, being the fifth day of May, instant, at the fomnsiin afore-
ead, C. D., of the same township, currier, made an assault upon him, the said A. B., and
is en and there did violently beat and abuse him. These are, therefore, to command you
orthwith to take the said C. D., and bring him before the said J. R., to answer the said
complaint, and further to be dealt with according to law. Witness the said J. R., at S.
ao alecesad the eighth day of May, in the year of our Lord one thousand’ eight
1undred and seventy-nine. J. R., Justice of the Peace. lence
Return of the Constable.—The within-named ©. D. is now in my custody.
X. Y., Constable, May 8th, 1879.
1 Bao. Abr.
A
# Whart. Cr. L. 2 1259. 5 Clark 78, ‘ Tha. @ te una eae are
ASSIGNMENTS FOR CREDITORS. 183
VI. On hearing, if the defendant admit the truth of the charge, or if the justice
shall, by evidence, be satisfied it is well founded, he is to call upon the defendant tc
enter into a recognisance, in such amount as he, the justice, shall think sufficient
to insure his attendance at court to answer the charge; requiring also one surety.
If the defendant neglect or refuse to give the bail required, he must be committed
to jail. If the evidence shall be such as to satisfy the justice that the complainant
was the aggressor, he should call upon him to give security for his appearance to
answer at the next court of quarter sessions, unless the parties can be persuaded
that it is a matter, a public inquiry into which would reflect no credit on either of
them, and ought to be discontinued. If the defendant be discharged, he should on
no account be charged any costs. If either of the parties be bound over, the justice
should, as in every case of a binding over, make a return to the next court of the pro-
ceedings had before him, to the end that such order may be taken on it as the public
good shall require.
By the revised penal code, justices of the peace are authorized to settle cases of
assault and battery, where the complainant shall appear before him, and acknowledge
to have received satisfaction for the injury, and thereupon, in his discretion, to dis-
charge the defendant from his recognisance, or in case of committal, to discharge
the defendant from arrest. This, however, does not extend to an assault and battery
committed by or on any officer or minister of justice. In cases of a trivial nature,
in which the public have no interest, and which in a vast majority of instances only
expose the prosecutor and the defendant to contempt or shame, it is the duty of
the justice to endeavor to exercise his influence, to do his best to induce them ta
consent, that all further proceedings may be stayed.
a
Assiqnments for Creditors.
I. Of void assignments. III. Proceedings on an assignment.
II. Of preferences in assignments,
I. OF VoID ASSIGNMENTS.
InasMucH as the proceeds of property in the hands of an assignee for the benefit
of creditors, under a void assignment, are liable to be attached by the judgment
creditors of the assignor, by process of attachment in execution, it is of great
importance that a justice of the peace should be well instructed in the forms which
are required to render such an assignment valid.?
And this is regulated by the act of 24th March 1818, which provides that all
assignments for the benefit of creditors, ‘‘ which shall not be recorded in the office
for recording of deeds, in the county in which such assignor resides, within thirty
days after the execution thereof, shall be considered null and void as against any
of the creditors of the said assignor.’”*? ‘The thirty days begin to run from the
time of executing the instrument, not from its delivery to the assignee.’
A partial assignment is within the act, and must be recorded:* and an assign-
ment of the surplus remaining after such partial assignment.’ Aad so isa power
of attorney to collect moneys and pay them to certain creditors, in a prescribed
order of preference.® And also, an absolute conveyance, with accompanying declara-
tion of a trust ;? and a lease reserving rent in trust for the benefit of creditors, is
within the act.®
But a mortgage in trust to secure certain creditors is not within the act ;® nor is
a judgment in trust for creditors; nor an assignment made directly to the creditors
beneficially interested in it, either as collateral security, or in satisfaction." To
15 W.& 8.103. 5 Penn. St. 39. 13 Ibid. TA Tbid. 477. 34 Ibid. 152.
07. 8 32 Ibid. 458. 40 Ibid. 269.
2 Purd. 142. 94W.& S&S. 383. 103 Penn. St. 374.
8 46 Penn. St. 415. 10 26 Penn. St.92, 1 Chest. Co. R.97. (bid. 34,
* 2 Whart. 240. 18 Leg. Int. 236. 11 24 Penn. St. 482, 31 Ibid. 502. And see
5 5 Whart. 280. 3 Phila. 454. 38 Penn. St. 382. 44 Ibid. 92. 1
§ 12 Penn. St. 164. Gr. 212. 21 Penn. St. 77, 83. 33 Ibid. 414,
184 ASSIGNMENTS FOR CREDITORS.
bring a case within the act. there must be a cestui que trust, with an adverse interest
to that of the assignee There must also be a transfer of the property ; more than
a mere transmission of its custody or management.”
The assignment must be recorded in the proper county, although the personal
property be situated in another state.® But the act does not apply to an assignment
by a resident of another state." And where an assignment includes as well real as
personal estate, it must be recorded not only in the county where the assignor
resides, but also in the county where the land is situate, or it 1s not valid as against
a subsequent purchaser from the assignor, without notice.® : : ;
An unrecorded assignment is valid as to a subsequent voluntary assignee.® Ana
an unrecorded mortgage is a lien as against an assignee of the mortgagor in
trust for the benefit of creditors; for he is neither a creditor nor a purchaser for
value." . :
In order to give effect to a deed of assignment, as against the creditors of the
assignor, it is necessary that there should be a delivery of it to the assignee. But
an actual manual delivery is not required ; the execution of an assignment to a
trustee, without his previous knowledge or assent, and the delivery of it to a mes-
senger to be conveyed to him, is enough, if he subsequently assent to it, and accept
the trust.? So, the deposit of it in the post-office directed to the assignee, is equally
available ; and so is a delivery to a third person for the use of the assignee.
The act of 3d May 1855 provides, that “ whenever any person making any assign-
ment of his or her estate situate within this commonwealth, for the benefit of
creditors, shall be resident out of this state, such assignment may be recorded within
any county, where such estate, real or personal, may be, and take effect from its
date. Provided, That no bond fide purchaser, mortgagee or creditor having a lien
thereon before the recording in the same county, and not having had previous actual
notice thereof, shall be affected or prejudiced: and the courts of common pleas may
dismiss or appoint trustees under such assignment, as in other cases.” By act 23d
April 1857, this is extended to prior assignments.”
The resolution on the 21st January 1843 provides, that ‘it shall not be lawful
for any company incorporated by the laws of this commonwealth, and empowered
to construct, make and manage any railroad, canal or other public internal improve-
ment, while the debts and liabilities, or any part thereof, incurred by the said
company to contractors, laborers and workmen, employed in the construction or
repair of said improvement, remain unpaid, to execute a general or partial assign-
ment, conveyance, mortgage or other transfer, of the real or personal estate of the
said company, so as to defeat, postpone, endanger or delay their said creditors,
without the written assent of the said creditors first had and obtained; and any
such assignment, conveyance, mortgage or transfer, shall be deemed fraudulent, null
and void, as against any such contractors, laborers and workmen, creditors as afore-
said.”!* And the act of 4th April 1862 gives a remedy in such case, by scire fucias
against the assignee.
A civil engineer is not a laborer or workman, within the protection of the act;
nor a sub-contractor.” The act creates a lien of indefinite duration on the road, in
favor of the persons enumerated therein, which has precedence over every right
. that can be acquired by or under any mortgage made after the debt was contracted ;
and which is not merged in any judgment obtained by the preferred creditor for his
claim, nor by any proceedings in scire facias upon such judgment; in whatever
142 Penn. St, 441. Ibid. 235. 44 Ibid. 92. T 32 Penn. St. 121.
An insolvent debtor may prefer one creditor either 8 5 W. 343.
by judgment or deed, or in any manner except by 9 1 Binn. 502.
an assignment in trust. 38 Penn. St. 446. 10 5 W. 343,
. ena, - > S. & R. 318. And see 85 Penn. St. 231.
1. 499. : urd. 143. If the assignment be not 80 re-
417 Ibid. 91. 18 Ibid. 185, 1 Phila. 29. corded, a foreign stesiuiait will bind the prop-
5 15 Penn. St. 399. _Butif it be duly recorded in erty. 50 Penn, St. 230. See 85 Ibid. 231. 14
ie proper ee it alee shown that pur- W. N.C. 285.
chasers in another county had notico of the as- B Purd. 1 fs
signment. 102 Penn. St. 585. Seo 13 W.N.C. N.C, 56. per epee tae merken
505. Purd, 13
6 4 Penn. St. 274. Andsce5 W.& 8.100, 1 8 ree
Pars. 472. 7 Penn. St. 499. 16 84 Penn. St. 168
1144 Ibid. 92. 96 Ibid. 355,
ASSIGNMENTS FOR CREDITORS. 185
shape the debt may be, it has the benefit of the privilege given by the act. The
act of 1862 provides a remedy for its enforcement; but it does not extend the
privileges conferred.?
II. Or PREFERENCES IN ASSIGNMENTS.
A debtor may make a voluntary assignment for the benefit of his creditors, of his
estate real or personal, or any part thereof, but he may not, in and by the instrument
of assignment, create and reserve an interest for himself or his family. Such an
instrument is void under the statute of 13 Eliz., which avoids all conveyances
made with intent to delay, hinder or defraud creditors.’
An assignment stipulating for a release and excepting the household furniture of
the assignors and property exempt from execution, is voidable by creditors.‘ But
a reservation of property to the amount of $300, such as is exempt from levy and
sale by the act of 1849, will not avoid the deed; nor will an exception of certain
specific property.
The acts of 1843 and 1849, have imposed the further restriction upon assignors,
that they shall not prefer one creditor or set of creditors to another; and have
avoided all such attempts to give a preference.
‘« All assignments of property in trust which shall hereafter be made by debtors
to trustees, on account of inability at the time of the assignments to pay their
debts, to prefer one or more creditors (except for the payment of wages of labor),
shall be held and construed to inure to the benefit of all the creditors in proportion
to their respective demands; and all such assignments shall be subject in all
respects to the laws now in force relative to voluntary assignments: Provided,
That the claims of laborers thus preferred shall not severally exceed the sum of
fifty dollars.’’
“ Any condition in assignments of property made by debtors to trustees on account
of inability at the time of the assignment to pay their debts, within the meaning of
the act, entitled ‘An act to prevent preferences in assignments,’ approved April
17th, 1843, for the payment of creditors only who shall execute a release, shall be
taken as a preference in favor of such creditors, and be void, and the assignment
be held and construed to inure to the benefit of all the creditors in proportion to
their respective demands.’”
The act of 1843 does not invalidate the assignment; it only avoids preferences
in assignments, and makes them to operate for the benefit of all the creditors of the
assignor as if such preferences were not inserted.* Nor does it prohibit a compo-
sition with a part of the creditors ;? nor an assignment of partnership property for
the payment of the firm debts only; for such assignment in no way hinders the
several creditors from reaching the surplus remaining after payment of the debts
of the partnership." Nor does it prevent a debtor from assigning a particular chose
in action directly to a creditor, for the purpose of securing his debt, although the
effect may be to give him a preference over the other creditors.” :
Judgments confessed to secure creditors are not such preferences as are avoided
by this act. It goes no further than to forbid preferences in and by the instru-
ment by which the debtor surrenders to his creditors all dominion over his
property. When property has been actually levied upon by the sheriff, and an
assignment is made, pending the levy, if the execution-creditors consent to a sale
by the assignee, he is justified in first paying the amount of their executions, and
the necessary costs of the levy; if, however, no actual levy was made, and the
executions were issued for the mere purpose of giving the creditors a preference,
such payments ought not to be allowed.” :
The wages of laborers are not only exempted from the operation of the act of 1843
1 22 Wall. 424. 79 Penn. St. 60. 85 Ibid. 25. 918 Penn. St. 23 Ibid. 481.
2 96 Penn. St. 355. 10 21 Ibid. 77, 83.
$6 Binn. 344. 128.4 R. 201. 1R.163. 2 M33Tbid. 414. ;
P.& W.92. 3 Thid. 91. 121 @r. 212. But it applies to an assignment
426 Penn. St. 473. 49 Ibid. 465. 100 Ibid. whereby a part of the assignor’s property is as-
582. : signed to be divided amongst certain named cred-
5 36 Ibid. 258. And see 38 Ibid. 160. 5 Phila. itors, prorata, there being other creditors, but not
83. sufficient remaining property to pay them.
8 Act 17 April 1843. Purd. 139. 18 7 Penn. St. 449. 43 Leg. Int. 7.
T Act 16 April 1849 34. Purd. 140. 4 19 Ibid. 59, 61. 20 Ibid. 37, 63, 152.
818 Penn. St. 185. Ibid. 331. % 2 Pars. 103.
186 ASSIGNMENTS FOR CREDITORS.
but they are further protected by the act of 1872 (as amended in 1891), which pro-
vides that ‘‘ all moneys that may be due or hereafter become due for labor and services
rendered by any miner or mechanic, servant girl at hotels, boarding-houses, restaurants
or in private families, or any other servant and helper in and about said houses of en-
tertainment and private families, porter, hostler or any other person employed in and
about livery stables or hotels, laundryman or washerwoman, seamster or seamstress
employed by merchant tailors or by any other person, milliner, dressmaker, clothier,
shirtmaker or clerk employed in stores or elsewhere, hand laborer, including farm
laborer or any other kind of laborer, printer, apprentice and all other tradesmen
hired for wages or salary from any person or persons, chartered company, joint-stock
company, limited partnership or other partnership, either as owner, lessee, contractor
or under-owner, whether at so much per diem or otherwise, for any period not ex-
ceeding six months preceding the sale or transfer of the real or personal property,
works, mines, manufactories or business or other property connected therewith in
carrying on the same of said person or persons, chartered company, joint-stock com-
pany, limited partnership or other partnership, by execution or otherwise, on account
of the death or insolvency of such employer or employers, shall be a lien upon said
real or personal property, mine, manufactory, business or other property in and about,
or used in carrying on said business or in connection therewith, to the extent of the
interest of such employer or employers in said property, and shall be preferred and
first paid out of the proceeds of the sale of such real and personal property, mine,
manufactory, business or other property as aforesaid: Provided, however, That the
claim thus preferred shall not exceed two hundred dollars: And provided further,
That this act shall not be so construed as to impair contracts existing, or liens of
record vested prior to its passage: And provided further, That no such claim shall
be a lien upon any real estate, unless the same be filed in the prothonotary’s office of
the county in which such real estate is situated, within three months after the same
becomes due and owing, in the same manner as mechanics’ liens are now filed.?
A household servant who is employed upon the understanding that she is to be paid
what her services are worth, is entitled to a preference out of a fund raised bya
sheriff’s sale of her employer's goods.?, Where a tailor-shop and merchant-tailoring
store were a part of the same business, and the contents of the store were sold under
execution, it was held that the wages of tailors who worked in the tailor-shop were
entitled toa preference.* A travelling salesman, on commission, for a furniture manu-
factory, is not a clerk, laborer or tradesman within the meaning of this act. This
act includes farm laborers and all other kinds of laborers who work for wages or sala-
ries.° Laborers employed in peeling bark and squaring timber have a lien for wages
upon the fund raised by the sale of the contractor’s teams and camp equipage.® This
act does not apply to the use and expense and wear and tear of a steam-engine and
separator used in threshing. Under this act, a father cannot claim wages for his own
use for labor done by his minor sons."
III. PRockEDINGS ON AN ASSIGNMENT.
In every case in which any person makes an assignment of his estate, real or per-
sonal, or of any part thereof, in trust for the benefit of creditors, it is the duty of the
assignee, within thirty days after the execution thereof, to file in the office of the pro-
thonotary of the court of common pleas of the county in which the assignor resides,
an inventory or schedule of the estate or effects so assigned, accompanied by an affi-
davit of the assignee that the same is a full and complete inventory thereof, so far as
the same has come to his knowledge. ;
The court of common pleas thereupon appoints two or more disinterested and com-
petent persons, to appraise the estate and effects so assigned. These appraisers, or
two of them, having at first taken an oath or affirmation, before some person having
authority to administer oath, to discharge their duties with fidelity, are required
forthwith to proceed and make an appraisement of the estate and effects assigned,
1 Purd. 2074. 5 ‘
2156 Penn. St. 384, oi Thi io
3156 Penn. St. 293, 1 Ibid, 237.
412 0. C. 363.
ASSIGNMENTS FOR CREDITORS. 187
according to the best of their judgment ; and having completed the same, to return the
inventory and appraisement to the court, where it is filed of record. The appraisers
are entitled, as compensation for their services, to receive a sum not exceeding one
dollar for each day diligently employed by them in the performance of their duties.
The appraisement having been filed, the assignee is required to give bond, with
at least two sufficient sureties, to be approved by one of the judges of the court of
common pleas, in double the amount of the appraised value of the estate so assigned ;
which bond is filed in the prothonotary’s office, and by him entered of record, and
inures to the use of all persons interested in the assigned estate! If security be not
given, the act 21st March 1831 empowers the court to dismiss the assignees and to
appoint others.”
The assignee may act before giving bond. If he neglect to file an inventory or
give bond, the remedy is to cite him before the court, to show cause why he should
not be dismissed.* Although the act of assembly requires that the assignee should
give bond with two sufficient sureties, to be approved by one of the judges, yet a
bond with but one surety and which does not appear to have been approved, is not
void ; and it may be enforced against the assignee and surety.
If any of the assigned property be the subject of a suit pending, the assignee is
authorized by the act of 13th June 1840, to appeal from an award of arbitrators
therein, and also to sue out a writ of’ error upon the judgment that may be rendered,
without paying costs or giving security; unless in the former case, the assignee
shall have taken out the rule of reference.’
The act 4th May 1864, § 1,$ provides that any assignor, under whose assignment in
trust for the benefit of creditors, either by general words or particular description, there
have been transferred any articles of household furniture or things of domestic use, may,
after the appraisement thereof, apply to the court of common pleas of the proper county,
to have set aside for the use of the said assignor and family, any of the said articles
and things, not exceeding in value, at the appraisement thereof, three hundred dollars ;
and the court may, if no cause be shown to the contrary, after due notice to creditors,
order that the same be released from the assigned estate and handed to the assignor."
Whenever it shall be made to appear, to the satisfaction of the court having juris-
diction of the accounts of an assignor under any assignment in trust for creditors,
either upon the report of an auditor or otherwise, after notice, by advertisement, for
such length of time as may be ordered by the court, that all the undisputed claims
upon the assigned fund or estate have been paid or released, and security to the
satisfaction of said court, as hereinafter set forth, shall be given for the payment of
any and all claims in dispute, the said court may order and direct the assignee
to reconvey to the assignor, all the assigned estate remaining in his hands and
possession, and all outstanding interest in the assigned estate; and the deed of
reconveyance shall be acknowledged in open court, and entered among the records
thereof; and thereupon the said estate shall be holden free and discharged from
any and all of the trusts of said assignment. ; .
The security required by this act, shall be by deposit of money, or of sufficient and
available securities for money, under the direction of the court, or by mortgage on
real estate, which shall inure to the benefit of the parties interested, who may sue for
the same, in the name of the commonwealth, in like manner as official bonds are sued.®
The act 17th February 1876 empowers the court of common pleas to make orders
for the sale of incumbered real estate. And the act 10th June 1881, provides that
the assignee shall accept the receipt of the purchaser, of a lien creditor, for his
proportion of the purchase-money; and that on a question of distribution, the
court shall proceed to determine the question of lien, as in case of a sheriff's sale.
1 Act 14 June 1836, Purd. 143. The form of 6 Purd, 144.
the bond is prescribed by the act 4 June 1883. 7 See 76 Penn. St. 116.
Ibid. As to the responsibility of the sureties, 8 Act 4 May 1864 32. Purd. 144.
see 48 Penn. St. 328, 342. 102 Ibid. 450. 9 Thid. 2 3.
2 Purd. 143, note b. 10 Purd. (40. oe nee
56 W. & S. 326. ll Tbid. 141. As this is a judicial sale, the
48 W. 228. The assignment passes the title, liens oniy bear interest to the time of confirma-
though the bond be not duly filed and approved. tion. 89 Penn. St. 276. 90 Ibid. 224. 94 Ibid.
49 Penn. St. 465, 522. Unless the fund be invested, and is draw-
5 Purd. 144. ing interest. 96 Ibid. 347.
, 188 ]
Assumpsit.
THE action of assumpsit lies where a party claims damages for breach of simple
contract, that is, a promise not under seal. Such promises may be express or im-
plied; and the law always implies a promise to do that which a party is legally Hable
to perform. This remedy is, consequently, of very large and extensive application.
And the acts of assembly give to justices of the peace, jurisdiction of all causes of
action arising from contract, either express or implied, where the sum demanded
does not exceed $300, except in cases of real contract where the title to lands may
come in question, or actions upon promise of marriage. They have, consequently,
jurisdiction of most cases of asswmpsit, with the exception of those which are
specially excluded by the statute. ; i
In every action of asswmpsit there ought to be a consideration, promise, and
breach of promise.? To make a consideration sufficient in law to support an assump-
sit, there must be some benefit arising to the defendant or some injury or loss to
the plaintiff® It is not essential that the consideration should be adequate in point
of actual value; it is sufficient that a slight benefit be conferred by the plaintiff
on the defendant, or a third person; or even if the plaintiff sustain the least
injury, inconvenience or detriment, or subject himself to any obligation, without
benefiting the defendant or any other person. A consideration is sufficient, if it
arise from any act of the plaintiff, from which the defendant or a stranger derives
any benefit, however small, if such act is performed by the plaintiff, with the assent,
express or implied, of the defendant; or by reason of any damage, or any suspen-
sion or forbearance of the plaintiff’s right at law or in equity; or any possibility of
loss occasioned to the plaintiff by the promise of another, although no actual benefit
accrues to the party undertaking.* Thus, assumpstt may be maintained on a promise
to subscribe a certain amount towards the building of a church.®
A moral or equitable obligation is a sufficient consideration for an assumption.’
But it must be such as was once a legal obligation; as a promise to pay a debt
barred by the statute of limitations ; or from which the debtor has been discharged
by bankruptcy; for when a man is under a moral obligation which no court of law
or equity can enforce, and he promises, the honesty and rectitude of the thing is a
consideration.”
A compromise of a doubtful claim is a sufficient consideration to support a
promise. And a promise to pay the debt of another, in consideration that the
creditor would wait, forbear or give time indefinitely, or for a reasonable time, at the
instance and request of the defendant, is binding.® Such contract, however,
must be in writing.”
The law will not aid in enforcing any contract that is illegal, or the consideration
of which is inconsistent with public policy and sound morality, or the integrity of
the domestic, civil or political institutions of the state.” And where part of an
indivisible promise, or any part of an indivisible consideration for a promise, is
illegal, it avoids the whole? The test, whether a demand connected with an illegal
transaction is capable of being enforced by law, is, whether the plaintiff requires
the aid of the illegal transaction to establish his case.
In order to constitute a valid promise, it is not necessary that it should be made to
the plaintiff himself; if made to a third person with a view to be communicated
to the plaintiff, it is sufficient. In general, he must be made plaintiff from whom
1 Steph. Plead. 18. ® § Binn. 33. 8 W.&S.10. 24 Penn. St- 367
7 Leon, 405. Privity of contract is essential. 92 Ibid. 289. 11 W.N. C. 165.
16 Penn. St. 380. 7 1 Penn. St. 451.
8 2 Binn. 509. 14 Phila. 647. 8 6 W. 421." 9 Ibid. 230. 46 Penn, St. 252.
42W.105. 5 Penn. St. 162. 13 Ibid. 53. 20 °5R.60. 2 Penn. St. 30.
Ibid. 303. 21 Ibid. 237. 10 See tit. “ Guarantee.”
5 18 Penn, St. 13. 20 Ibid. 260, 383 Ibid. 114. "5 W. & 8. 321. 6 Penn. St, 473.
87 Ibid. 210. Otherwiso, where no congregation 5 Penn. St. 521. 99 Ibid. 123.
has been formed. 10 Leg. Int.110. And see 7 118. & R.164. 28 Penn. St. 406.
W.N. C, 439. 1 Penn. St. 334.
SSE
ATTACHMENTS, 189
the consideration flowed ;! but the action will lie by a party beneficially interested
in a contract made by another.? Thus, if one pay money to another for the use of
a third person, or, having money belonging to another, agree with that other to
pay it to a third, action lies by the person beneficially interested. But where the
contract is for the benefit of the contracting party, and the third person is a stranger
to the consideration, the action must be by the promisee.2 Nor can a third person
beneficially interested, maintain an action on the promise, where the promisor
remains liable to a suit by the promisee or his personal representatives.‘
A conveyance of land “under and subject” to an existing mortgage, is a cove-
nant of indemnity only as between the grantor and grantee for the protection of the
former, in the absence of an express or implied agreement to assume the payment
thereof; the acceptance, by a remote grantee, of such conveyance, does not raise
an implied assumpsit in favor of the holder of the mortgage §
An assignee of a chose in action may maintain, in his own name, an action of
assumpsit, upon an express promise by the defendant to pay him, without any new
consideration® An express promise of a debtor, to pay the assignee of his creditor,
will bind him as firmly as if it had originated in a consideration moving from him,
and been his from the outset.”
Where one takes the personal property of another, the owner may waive the tort,
and maintain assumpsit for its value.* Asswmpsit for goods sold and delivered may
be maintained, where goods have been delivered by the plaintiff to the defendant,
though not ordered, if retained by him; the retention implies a promise to pay the
market price of the goods.2 But assumpsié will not lie for the value of a chattel
illegally detained, but not actually converted.”
By the act of 25 May 1887, all demands heretofore recoverable in debt, assumpsit
or covenant, are now recoverable in asswmpsit."'
Attachment by Justices (Domestic).
I. A DOMESTIC ATTACHMENT is so called because it may issue against persons
who are inhabitants, have their domicil, or are domesticated here, in cases where
they have been guilty of certain acts of absconding, absenting or concealment ;
and is, so far as respects creditors, in the nature of a commission of bankruptcy,
because it is for the benefit of all the creditors, and all the property of the debtor
is seized and distributed among them pro rata.
1. It can be issued only against persons who are inhabitants of the state.
2. It cannot be issued without oath or affirmation first made.
8. It is for the benefit of all the defendant’s creditors, and not for the benefit of
the plaintiff alone. ae ;
4, All the property of the persons proceeded against is placed in the custody
of two freeholders [trustees], who are to distribute it among the creditors. ;
5. It can only be dissolved by satisfying the court [ justice], that the parties
were not liable to the attachment.
The act of 22d August 1752, as amended by that of 4th December 1807, pro-
vides that if any person shall absent him or herself out of this government,
or abscond from his or her usual place of abode, not taking care to satisfy his or
her just debts, it shall and may be lawful for any justice of the peace where such
person’s estate may be found, to grant a writ of attachment for any debt not
exceeding one hundred dollars, directed to any constable of the same county, to
attach the goods and chattels, or other effects of such person, to answer the
creditor.
1 5 Penn. St. 521. 617 Penn St: 169. 3 Leg. & Ins. Rep. 61.
27 W. & §. 94. 74 Leg. & Ins. Rep.27. .
3 6 W. 182. See 2 Phila. 63. 40 Penn. St. 448. 814 Penn. St. 295. 35 Ibid. 351. 2 Greeni
4 85 Penn. St. 303. Evid. 23 108, 120, 226.
5 88 Ibid. 450. Ibid. 465. 92 Ibid. 491. 93 9° 64 Penn. St. 383.
Ibid. 42. See act 12 June 1878, Purd.1837,as 101 W N.C. 84, 102 Penn. St, 555.
to future cases. That act has no retrospective 11 Purd. 1728.
ion. . St. 78. 12 Serg. Attach, 1, 2, 4, 5, 6.
operation. 90 Penn. St. 7: Carn i 2,
190 ATTACHMENTS.
It is not necessary to authorize the issuing of a domestic attachment by a justice
of the peace, that the defendant should have absconded or secreted himself for the
space of six days; that provision of the act of 1752 was repealed by the act of
1807.1 The absence of a theatrical manager in pursuance of his business, is no
ground for a domestic attachment.? An attachment issued by a justice of the peace
may be executed by a deputy-constable.? A domestic attachment may issue upon
a debt not due, if there be in other respects sufficient grounds for it.*
The acts of assembly provide further, that before the granting any such attach-
ment, the person or persous requesting the same, or some other credible person or
persons for him or them, shall, upon oath or affirmation, declare that the defendant
in such attachment is indebted to the plaintiff therein named in a sum not exceed-
ing one hundred dollars, and that the defendant has absconded or departed from
the place of his usual abode in this state, or has remained absent from the state, or
has confined himself in his own house, or concealed himself elsewhere, with design
to defraud his creditors, as is believed, and that the defendant has not left a clear
fee-simple estate in lands or tenements within this commonwealth sufficient to pay
his debts, so far as the plaintiff or deponent knows or believes; which oath or
affirmation the justice of the peace that grants such writ, is empowered and required
to administer. And if any attachment be granted out otherwise, or contrary to the
true intent and meaning of the act, the justice of the peace so granting the same,
shall, for every such offence, forfeit the sum of one hundred dollars, for the use of
him or her that will-sue for the same.
It is not necessary that the affidavit to ground a domestic attachment should aver
the defendant’s residence But an affidavit which states the causes for which the
attachment issued in the alternative, e. g., that the defendant ‘“ absconded or departed
from the place of his usual abode, or secreted himself with design,” &c., is bad,
and the writ must be quashed.’
In an action for maliciously suing out a domestic attachment, is not enough for
the defence, that the suspiciousness of the plaintiff's conduct had made recourse to
an attachment a measure of reasonable precaution, irrespective of the fraudulent
intention of the debtor. ®
As soon as the justice of the peace before whom the writ of attachment is return-
able, accepts the constable’s return thereof, he is required immediately to appoint
two substantial freeholders to take into their custody the goods and chattels attached,
for which they shall be accountable until they dispose of the same, as directed
by the act of assembly.
The right of the trustees to the defendant’s goods does not relate back to the
issuing of the attachment, as in cases of proceedings in the common pleas.° They
are entitled to the balance in the sheriff’s hands, after satisfying an execution.”
Where a defendant against whom a domestic attachment had issued, transferred
to G.a check for the payment of money, which G. applied to the payment of a
debt for which he was security for the defendant, it was held, that an action would
not lie, by the trustees, against G., to recover the amount of the check?
The justice is also required forthwith to publish his proceedings by advertise-
ment in the most public places, near the late dwelling-place of the defendant, and
likewise in one or more public newspapers, appointing the time and place for all
the creditors of the person against whose effects and estate the attachment is
granted, to appear then and there, to discover and make proof of their demands,
And if, after a full and careful examination, it shall appear that there is a just
ane oe any person from the said defendant, exceeding the sum of one hundred
os a t a the said antes shall no further proceed, but shall deliver and certify
fag — of the court of common pleas of the same county, the said
, and all proceedings thereon had before him ; whereupon further pro-
ceedings shall be had in the court of common pleas, with like effect as if the writ
of attachment had issued out of that court."
13.144. 1M. 75,
25 Phila. 83. re bh We 8. 201
83 P. & W. 230, ® Purd. 700.
44W.&8. 201, 03 P. & W. 280
5 Purd, 700-1, 1 Thid. 389.
61M. 75. 1 Wood. 221, 2 1W. & S. 108
"3 W. 144, 1M. 75, 2 Clark 79, See 1 18 Purd. 700,
ATTACHMENTS. 191
When any attachment shall be granted by a justice of the peace, no second or
other attachment issued by the said justice, or by any other justice within the
same county, or by the court of common pleas of the said county, shall bind or
affect the property of the defendant within the county, whilst the proceedings in
the first writ of attachment remain undetermined.?
When the justice shall accept of the return of an attachment from the constable,
and it shall appear to him that any cattle or other chattels necessary to be main-
tained at expense, or any perishable goods, have been attached, it shall be lawful
for the justice to order sale of them to be made by the freeholders, within ten days ;
of which public notice shall be given, at least six days before the sale thereof, by
advertisements to be set up at the most public places near the place of sale. And
the-money arising therefrom shall be lodged in the hands of the freeholders,
to be attached or distributed among the creditors, in the manner directed and
appointed by the act.”
Perishable goods are such as are liable to perish before the term arrives at which
the trustees are authorized to sell. Wines and liquors are not such perishable
goods. But a shallop was ordered to be sold as a changeable commodity.‘
If no debt exceeding one hundred dollars shall appear to be due from the
defendant, then the goods, chattels and other effects in the hands of the free-
holpers shall be brought to an appraisement, but not sold (except chargeable or
perishable goods), until the expiration of three months from the granting
of the attachment, to the end that the debtor may have time to redeem them, if
he sees fit.
But if, after the expiration of three months, the debtor shall not appear and
redeem them, on notice thereof being given to the justice, he shall forthwith order
and direct the said freeholders to make sale thereof; and out of the money arising
therefrom, and all other money then in their hands, arising from any part of the
defendant’s estate (reasonable charges first deducted), to make payment to the cred-
itors who shall appear and make proof of their debts within the said three
months, in proportion to their respective debts, and the overplus, if any, to be
returned to the owners. But before any such sale is made, the freeholders shall
give at least ten days’ notice thereof, by advertising in the most public places the
time and place of such sale.
The freeholders, within six days after making sale aud distribution, shall render
atrue account of their proceedings to the justice who granted the attachment, to
be by him kept as a record of their proceedings therein®
Justices of the peace and aldermen have like power with the courts of common
pleas, to dissolve writs of attachment in cases within their jurisdiction, and upon
the same proofs ; provided application be made for that purpose within twenty days
after the return of the writ.”
A domestic attachment may be dissolved on application of the defendant, sup-
ported by affidavit, denying the allegations upon which the attachment was founded,
and the justice being satisfied that the defendant was not liable to the attachment.
It is sufficient to give notice of such application to the attaching-creditor ; notice
to all the creditors is not required. The parties who have issued the process are
bound to support it, when attacked.” Sa ee
The dissolution of an attachment will not have the effect of invalidating any sale
made by the trustees, or of any payments to them.”
II. OavH oR AFFIRMATION PREVIOUSLY TO GRANTING AN ATTACHMENT.
J.D.
vs. Attachment not exceeding $100.
R. R.
DAUPHIN COUNTY, ss. ;
J.D., of the township of S——, in the county of Dauphin, yeoman, upon his solemn
affirmation doth declare, that R. R., of the same township, is indebted to him in a sum ge
exceeding one hundred dollars, and that the said R. R. has absconded from the place of his
1 Purd. 701. 6 Purd. 701.
: Ibid. ey
5 Clark 147. id.
41 Dall. 379. 9 Ibid. 2 Y. 277.
5 Pard. 701, z 10 Tbid.
192 ATTACHMENTS.
usual abode in this state, with design to defraud his creditors, as is believed, and that the
said R. R. has not left a clear fee- inpla estate in lands and tenements within this state
sufficient to pay his debts, so far as the said J. J). knows or believes. :
Affirmed and subscribed, May lst, 1879, (Signed) J.D.
before me, J. R., Justice of the Peace.
DoMESTIO ATTACHMENT.
DAUPHIN COUNTY, ss.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To the Constable of the Township of S——, in the County of Dauphin :
We command you, that you attach R. R., of the township of S——,, in the county afore-
said, by all and singular his goods and chattels or effects, in whose hands or possession
soever the same may be found within this county, so that he appears before J. B., one of
our justices of the peace in and for the said county, on the 6th day of May inst., at nine
o'clock in the forenoon of that day, at his office in H——— township aforesaid, to answer
J.D. of a plea of debt not exceeding one hundred dollars. Hereof fail not. Witness the
id J. R., at S—— township aforesaid, the first day of May, a. pv. 1879.
= re ; J.R., Justice of the Peace. [sEaL.]
Constable's return.—Attached one feather bed and bedding, one cow, one barrel of cider,
six Windsor chairs, one iron tea-kettle, two iron pots and one tub, Attached the same in
the hands of David White, of Swatara township, tailor. So answers, :
L. M., Constable of Swatara township.
Or if the constable cannot find property of the defendant, he may return, “ The defend-
ant has no goods and chattels within the county whereby he can be attached.” So
answers, &c.
APPOINTMENT OF FREEHOLDERS.
DAUPHIN COUNTY, ss.
To R. S. and D. C., of S—— township, greeting :
You are hereby authorized and required to take into your custody all the goods and
chattels and effects of R. R., of the township aforesaid, cordwainer, mentioned in the
schedule hereunto annexed, and attached at the suit of J. D., for which you are to be
accountable, until the same shall be disposed of according to law. Given under my hand
and seal, at S—— township aforesaid, the 7th day of May, a. p. 1879.
J. R., Justice of the Peace. [sEat.]
SUMMONS AGAINST THE GARNISHEE.
DAUPHIN COUNTY, ss.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To the Constable of the Township of S—, in the county of Dauphin, greeting :
- Wurrzas, J. D., of the township aforesaid, yeoman, upon the first day of May inst.,
obtained an attachment from J. R., one of our justices of the peace in and for the county
aforesaid, directed to you, wherein you were commanded to attach R. R., of the said
township, by all and singular his goods and chattels, or other effects, in whose hands or
possession soever the same might be found within this county, to answer the said J. D.
of a plea of debt not exceeding one hundred dollars. And whereas, in pursuance of the
said attachment, you, the said constable, did make return to the said justice, that you had
attached sundry goods and effects of the said R. R. in the hands of D. W.. of the town-
ship aforesaid, according to a schedule of the same goods and effeets annoxod to the said
attachment. These are, therefore, to command you to summon the said D. W. to appear
before the said J. R., at his office, in the township aforesaid, on the seventh day of May
inst., at two o’clock in the afternoon of that day, to show cause, if any he hath, why he
should not yield up the goods and effects, attached as aforesaid, in his hands for the use
of the creditors of the said R. R. Hereof fail not. Witness the said J. R., at S——
township aforesaid, the 2d day of May, a. pv. 1879. ms
J.R., Justice of the Peace. [sEat.]
“Served on the within-named D. W., by producing to hi be origi
informing him of the contents thereof,” ie cancer tees ip een ae
ATTACHMENTS. 193
Novice To THE CREDITORS.
Wauernas, in pursuance of an act of general assembly of the commonwealth of Penn-
sylvania, an attachment hath been granted by the subscriber, one of the justices of the
peace in and for the said county of Dauphin, at the instance of a certain J. D., of S——
township, in the county of Dauphin, against a certain R.R., of the township of S——, in
the county aforesaid, whereon certain goods and chattels and effects of the said R. R. have
been attached and are now in the custody of R. S. and D. ©. of the said township. This
is, therefore, to give notice to the creditors of the said R. R., to appear on the tenth day
of May 1879, at the house of W.M., of the township aforesaid, innkeeper, then and there
to discover and make proof of their demands agreeable to the directions of the said act.
J. R., Justice of the Peace. [szau.]
ORDER TO FREEHOLDERS TO SELL CHARGEABLE AND PERISHABLE GOODS.
DAUPHIN COUNTY, ss.
To R. S. and D. C., of S—— township, greeting:
Wuerzas, among other articles attached as the property of R. R., late of S—— town-
ship, in the county of Dauphin, and now remaining in your custody, until further orders,
there are one cow, and a barrel of cider, the former of which must necessarily be main-
tained at expense, and both are liable to perish. You are, therefore, hereby required to
make sale of the said cow and barrel of cider, within ten days from this date, first giving
public notice thereof, at least six days before the sale, by advertisements to be set up at
the most public places near the place of sale. Given under my hand and seal, at S——
township aforesaid, the 10th day of May, a. p. 1879.
J. R., Justice of the Peace. [sEax.]
ForM OF APPRAISEMENT.
AN appraisement of the several goods and chattels attached at the suit of J. D. as the
property of R. R., late of S township, in the county of Dauphin, cordwainer, by
virtue of the warrant of J. R., Esq., one of the justices of the peace in and for the county
of Dauphin, viz. :
One feather bed and bedding, valued at - ; . . ‘ . $30.00
One brindled cow a oer é A c . i ‘ 7 . 25.00
Six Windsor chairs & So os . * : et ee . 8.00
One iron tea-kettle ia wen Si : é ‘ . 7 Fs ‘ - 1.00
Two iron pots ee a . . 3 me ~ . « 1.40
Onetub . . «© «© «© ‘ s - : ml 9a 3 50
One barrel of cider a ee 7 . . : é 3 . 2.00
June Ist, a. p. 1879.
Appraised by us, J. G. and T. B., Appraisers.
GENERAL ORDER TO FREEHOLDERS TO SELL.
DAUPHIN COUNTY, ss. ‘
To R. S. and D. C., of —— township, greeting :
Wuereas, three months are expired since the goods, chattels and effects of R. R., late
of the township of S—— aforesaid, were attached, and notice hath been given to me that
the said R. R. hath not appeared to redeem the said property. You are, therefore, hereby
required and directed to make sale of the said goods, chattels and effects, and out of the
money arising therefrom, and all other money in your hands from any part of the said
R. B.'s estate arising, reasonable charges first deducted, you are to make payment to the
creditors of the said R. R., who shall have appeared and made proof of their debt within
the said three months, in proportion of their respective debts, returning the overplus, if
any, to the said R. R. But before any sale shall be made, you are to give at least ten
days’ notice thereof, by advertising in the most public places the time and place of such
sale; and within six days next after making sale and distribution as aforesaid, you are
to render a true account of your proceedings to me. Given under my hand and seal, at
S—— township, aforesaid, the 20th day of August, a. p. 1879.
J. R., Justice of the Peace. [sEat.]
ADVERTISEMENT OF SALE.
Poustic notice is hereby given, that by virtue of an order from J. B., one of the justices
of the peace in and for the county of Dauphin, will be exposed to public sale, on Monday
the 12th day of September next, at ten o'clock in the forenoon, at the house of W. H.,
‘nnkeeper, in the township of S——, in the said county, one feather bed and bedding, six
Windsor chairs, one iron tea-kettle, two iron pots, and one tub, attached as the property
of R. R., late of the said township, cordwainer. Attendance will be given, and the terms
Deter ager R. S.} Freeholders duly
Sentemher Int 1879 2 ~ D.C.j appointed, &.
[ 194 ]
Attachment
Against absent and fraudulent Debtors.
Attachments against non-resident debtors. ae Form of plaintiffs bond.
nr Attachments against fraudulent debtors. TX. Form of attachment.
ITI Of the plaintiff’s bond. X. Forthcoming bond.
IV Service of the attachment. XI. Affidavit to open judgment.
V_ Proceedings before the justice. XII. Notice of rehearing.
VI Of the lien of the attachment. XIII. Form of docket-entry.
VIL Form of plaintiff's affidavit.
I, ATTACHMENTS AGAINST NON-RESIDENT DEBTORS.
Wuenever by the provisions of the twenty-fourth section of this act no capias
can issue [that is, for any demand arising from contract, except for money collected
by a public officer, or for official misconduct], and the defendant shall reside out of
the county, he shall be proceeded against by summons, or attachment, returnable
not less than two, nor more than four days from the date thereof, which shall be
served at least two days before the time of appearance mentioned therein.’ —
It shall be the duty of any alderman or justice of the peace, for any claims not
exceeding one hundred dollars, to issue an attachment against any defendant, on
the application of the plaintiff, in any case where, by the provisions of any law now
existing, or hereafter to be passed, no capias can issue, upon proof by the affidavit of
the plaintiff, or some other person or persons, to the satisfaction of the alderman
or justice of the peace that the defendant is a non-resident of this commonwealth ;?
which affidavit shall also specify the amount of the plaintiffs claim, or the bal-
ance thereof, over and above all discounts which the defendant may have against
him: Provided, That before such attachment shall issue, the plaintiff, or some
one in his behalf, shall execute a bond, in at least double the amount of the
plaintiff's claim, with good and sufficient security, conditioned that in case
the plaintiff shall fail to recover a judgment, at least of one-half the amount of
his claim, he shall pay to the defendant his damages for the wrongful taking
of any property over and above an amount sufficient to satisfy the judgment
and costs, and that if the plaintiff shall fail in his action, he shall pay to the
defendant his legal costs, and all damages which he may sustain by reason of said
attachment.®
Every such attachment shall be made returnable not less than two nor more
than four days from the date thereof, and shall be served by the constable to
whom the same shall be directed, by attaching so much of the defendant’s pro-
perty as will be sufficient to pay the debt demanded, and by delivering to hima
copy of the said attachment, with an inventory of the property attached, if he can be
found in the county; if not so found, then by leaving a copy of said attachment
and inventory with the person in whose possession the said property may be found
The constable shall state specifically the manner in which he shall have served
such attachment, and it shall be his duty to take the property attached into his
possession, unless the defendant, or some other person for him, shall enter into
a bond, with sufficient surety, in at least double the amount of the plaintiff’s
claim, conditioned that in the event of the plaintiff recovering judgment against
him, he will pay the debt and costs, at the expiration of the stay of execution
given by law to freeholders, or that he will surrender up the property attached
to any officer having an execution against him on a judgment recovered in such
attachment; if such attachment shall be returned personally served upon the
defendant, at least two days before the return-day thereof, the alderman or justice
of the peace shall, on the return-day, proceed to hear and determine the same in
the same manner as upon a summons returned personally served ; but if the same
shall not have been so served, the alderman or justice of the peace shall issue a
1 Act 12 July 1842 2 26. Purd. 1136, 3 Act 8 May 1874
2 A non-resident plaintiff may sue anon-resi- # Ibid, 3 2. aR
dent defondant under this act. 42 Leg. Int. 415,
ATTACHMENTS. 195
summons against the defendant, returnable as summonses issued by justices of the
peace are now by law returnable, and if the said summons shall be returned per-
sonally served, or that the defendant, after diligent inquiry, cannot be found in the
county, then, in either case, the alderman or justice of the peace shall proceed to
hear i determine the cause, in the same manner as upon a summons personally
served.
A judgment obtained before any alderman or justice of the peace, in any suit
commenced by attachment, when the defendant shall not be personally served with
the attachment or summons, and shall not appear, shall be only presumptive evi-.
dence of indebtedness, in any scire facias that may be brought thereon, and may
be disproven by the defendant; and no execution issued upon such judgment
shall be levied upon any other property than such as was seized by virtue of said
attachment; nor shall any defendant in such case be barred of any set-off which
he may have against the plaintiff; and the right of appeal, either as to the original
judgment, or upon a judgment rendered after the issuing of a scire facias, shall
be the same as now regulated in proceedings before aldermen or justices of the
peace, upon summons personally served: And provided, That any exemption law
of this commonwealth, shall not be construed to extend to any debtor not a resident
thereof?
The jurisdiction conferred upon justices of the peace, by the act of 1842, to
proceed by attachment against fraudulent debtors, was enlarged by the act of 1879,
so as to include cases where the sum demanded does not exceed three hundred dol-
lars? And this would appear to extend to proceedings against non-resident debtors,
under the act of 1874.4
II. ATTACHMENTS AGAINST FRAUDULENT DEBTORS.
It shall be the duty of any alderman or justice of the peace to issue an attach-
ment against any defendant, on the application of the plaintiff, in any case, where,
by the provisions of this act, no capias can issue, upon proof, by the affidavit of
the plaintiff, or some other person or persons, to the satisfaction of the alderman
or justice, that the defendant is about to remove from the county any of his pro-
perty, with intent to defraud his creditors, or has assigned, disposed of, or secreted,
or is about to assign, dispose of, or secrete, any of his property, with the like fraudu-
lent intent; which affidavit shall also specify the amount of the plaintiff’s claim, or
the balance thereof, over and above all discounts which the defendant may have
against him.®
The plaintiff's affidavit must state with precision one or more of the causes for
issuing the attachment mentioned in this section ; if several causes, as, for instance,
that the defendant has assigned or secreted his property, with the intent mentioned
in the act, are set forth in the alternative, the affidavit will be insufficient.’
The court of common pleas of Philadelphia county has decided, that a defend-
ant against whom an attachment has been issued, under the act of 1842, may
traverse (or deny) the cause for issuing the writ, set forth in the plaintiff’s affidavit.
The proper mode for so doing is by plea in abatement.’ Whether the defendant
was about to remove his property, is matter in abatement, to be pleaded.® The truth
of the facts on which an attachment is founded, can be investigated only on a plea
in abatement, and not on a motion? An attachment, if, sufficient on its face, is
a justification to the officer serving it, although in fact, issued on an insufficient
affidavit.
Irregularity in the affidavit and bond to support an attachment, should be taken
advantage of by motion to quash the attachment.” And although the affidavit made,
1 Act 8 May 1874 2 3. Purd. 1138. against an absconding debtor. 4 Leg. Gaz. 30.
2 Thid. 2 rid See pas 130. 62 Clark 79. 1M. 75, 3 W.144. 4 N.Y.
3 105 Penn. St. 610. 385. Contra, 11 Ibid. 339. ‘And see 1 Wood. 221.
4 The case in 14 W. N. CO. 258, was decided 7? McKinty v. Shore.
prior to the decision of the supreme court in 105 8 7 Humph. 165,
Penn. St. 610, and appears to be overruled by it. 910 Mo. 350. 6 Ala. 139. igi
And see 42 Leg. Int. 415. 10 23 Penn. St. 189, 1 Barb. 552. 24 Wend. 485.
5 Act 12 July 1842 3 27. Purd.1136. Under this 1 1 Morris 54.
section, a justice cannot issue an attachment
196 ATTACHMENTS.
and bond executed by the plaintiff to found an attachment, be defective, the defend-
ant waives the irregularity by appearing and confessing judgment.’
‘An affidevit to found an attachment set forth “ that the said defendants were
about to remove their property from this state to the injury of the plaintiff: this
fact was traversed by plea in abatement, and under this issue, the defendants
offered to prove that one of them had sufficient unincumbered personal property in
the state to discharge the plaintiff's demand; the evidence was objected to and
excluded by the court: held, that the court erred in excluding the evidence.” To
sustain an attachment on the ground that the debtor “ is about to remove his pro-
perty from this state, to the injury of such ereditor,” two things must coneur : first,
the debtor must be about to remove his property from the state; and secondly,
such removal, if effected, must be to the injury of the creditor. The single fact
that he is about to remove his property from the state, will not justify a creditor in
seizing it by attachment.? ; :
If the purpose of change of residence be an honest one, the intent to defraud is
not to be legally presumed from the mere fact that the debtor is about to remove
his goods ; it is the intent of the removal, not its effect, which must determine
whether it is lawful.*
III. Or THE PLAINTIFF'S BOND.
Before such attachment shall issue, the plaintiff, or some one in his behalf, shall
execute a bond, in the penalty of at least double the amount of the claim, with good
and sufficient sureties, conditioned that in case the plaintiff shall fail to recover a
judgment of at least one-half the amount of his claim, he shall pay to the defendant
his damages for the wrongful taking of any property over and above an amount suffi-
cient to satisfy the judgment and costs, and that if the plaintiff shall fail in his action
he shall pay to the defendant his legal costs, and all damages which he may sustain
by reason of the said attachment.®
There must be at least two sureties to the bond, besides the plaintiff; wherever
an act of assembly speaks of sureties in the plural, a single surety, however respon-
sible, will not satisfy the requirements of the law.* No one but the defendant can
take advantage of a defect in the bond.’
In a proceeding by attachment, under this section, where the justice entered a
nonsuit because a copy had not been served on the defendant, the bond given by
the plaintiff is binding on his sureties, even though the clause as to failure in the
action, has been omitted in it. Such bond is not void against a surety merely
because the penalty to a small extent exceeds double the amount of the plaintiff’s
claim. Nor is it necessary to pursue the principal in such bond, before having
recourse to the sureties.®
IV. SERVICE OF THE ATTACHMENT.
Every such attachment shall be made returnable not less than two, nor more than
four days from the date thereof, and shall be served by the constable to whom the
same shall be directed, by attaching so much of the defendant’s property, not exempt
by law from sale upon execution, as will be sufficient to pay the debt demanded, and
by delivering to him a copy of the said attachment and an inventory of the property
attached, if he can be found in the county, and if not so found, then by leaving a
copy of the same at his place of residence, with some adult member of his family,
or of the family where he shall reside; or if he be a non-resident of the county,
and cannot be found, then by leaving a copy of said attachment and inventory with
the person in whose possession the said property may be.®
An attachment under this act, unlike an attachment in execution, can only be
levied on personal chattels, which can be taken into the manual custody of the con-
stable, and not upon debts due the defendant, or rights in action. Goods attached
1 2 Clark 79. see 8 W. 223
: 5 Gilm. 21 7 23 Penn, St. 189.
; eee se 14 Ibid. 413.
304. A
5 Act 12 July 1842 2 27. Purd. 1136, i Reg, me Pre coon pee recorerr
64 R.32. 4 W.21. 31 Penn. St. 522. But 1 32 Penn. St. 452,
ATTACHMENTS. 197
are in the custody of the law, and cannot be distrained for rent. Nor can they be
taken in execution by process issued by another justice ; a sale under such process
would be void, and pass no title to the property? But where a tenant’s goods are
attached and removed from the premises by the constable, the landlord is entitled
to his rent out of the proceeds of sale.3
The constable shall state specifically in his return the manner in which he shall
have served such attachment, and it shall be his duty to take the property attached
into his possession, unless the defendant, or some other person for him, shall enter
into a bond, with sufficient surety, in the penalty of double the amount of the
ciaim, conditioned that in the event of the plaintiff recovering judgment against
him, he will pay the debt and costs, at the expiration of the stay of execution given
by law to freeholders; or that he will surrender up the property attached to any
officer having an execution against him on any such attachment.
In a suit by attachment prosecuted against two persons, as joint debtors, the
justice has no right to proceed and render judgment, where the return of the con-
stable only shows a service of the attachment on one of the defendants, but is silent
as to service on the other, and where the defect is not cured by an appearance.> In
all cases where an attachment is issued by a justice, it is the duty of the constable
to attach the goods of the defendant, make an inventory of the property seized,
and serve a copy of the attachment and inventory on the defendant personally, if
he can be found in the county. If he cannot be found in the county, the copy
must be left at his last place of residence; or if he have no place of residence in
the county, with the person in whose possession the goods are found: and the return
of the officer must “ state specifically whether such copy was or was not personally
served upon the defendant.’’6
V. PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE JUSTICE.
If such attachment shall be returned personally served upon the defendant, at
least two days before the return-day thereof, the alderman or justice shall, on the
return-day, proceed to hear and determine the game, in the same manner as upon a
summons returned personally served; but if the same shall not have been so served,
the alderman or justice shall issue a summons against the defendant, returnable as
summonses issued by justices of the peace are now by law returnable; and if the
said summons shall be returned personally served, or by leaving a copy at the resi-
dence of the defendant, or that the defendant, after diligent inquiry, cannot be
found in the county, then, in either case, the alderman or justice of the peace shall
proceed to hear and determine the cause, in the same manner as upon a summons
personally served.’ ;
Any defendant, against whom a judgment shall have been rendered in any case
where the attachment or’ summons shall not have been personally served, may,
within thirty days after the rendition of the same, apply to the alderman or justice
rendering the same for a hearing of the matter, and if he, or some other person
knowing the facts, shall, for him, make an affidavit, setting forth that he has
a just defence to the whole or part of the plaintiff's demand, it shall be the duty of
the alderman or justice to open the judgment, and give notice to the plaintiff
of the time when he will hear the parties, which time shall not be less than four,
nor more than eight days distant. On the said hearing, the justice shall proceed
in the manner directed in the thirtieth section of this act.’ The privilege of a
rehearing given by this sectien does not apply to actions originally commenced by
summons? techs «te :
A judgment obtained before any alderman or justice, in any suit commenced by
attachment, when the defendant shall not be personally served with the attachment
or summons, and shall not appear, shall be only presumptive evidence of indebt-
edness, in any scire facias that may be brought thereon, and may be disproved by
the defendant ; and no execution issued upon such judgment shall be levied upon
any other property than such as was seized under the attachment, nor shall any
defendant, in such case, be barred of any set-off which he may have against the
14W.& 8. 344. : ar ae
21 Gr. 172. a
36 W. & 8. 333 7 Act 12 July 1842 2 30, Purd. 1137.
$ Set 12 July 18 .Purd.1137, See2Luz. & Ibid. 2 31.
‘ a es uiy 1842 3 29. Purd.1137, San Eh
198 ATTACHMENTS.
plaintiff! The defendant in a suit commenced by attachment, under this act, is
entitled to the benefit of the $300 exemption law, if the judgment be founded on
a contract.’ ;
This act shall not be construed to extend the jurisdiction of justices of the peace
and aldermen to demands above one hundred dollars, and the same right which is
given to the parties respectively, to appeal from the decision of an alderman
or justice of the peace, by the act of the 20th day of March 1810, relating to the
proceedings of justices of the peace, is hereby given to the parties respectively,
in proceedings upon summons or attachments issued by aldermen or justices of the
peace, under this act. And all and singular the provisions of the said act, and its
several supplements, not hereby expressly repealed, and not inconsistent with the
provisions of this act, are hereby declared to be in full force, and to apply to
the provisions of this act, so far as the same relates to proceedings before aldermen
or justices of the peace, and to the powers of the courts of record over the pro-
ceedings of justices of the peace.?
VI. OF THE LIEN OF THE ATTACHMENT.
No attachment hereafter issued by any alderman or justice of the peace of this
commonwealth, in pursuance of the twenty-seventh section of the act, entitled ‘an
act to abolish imprisonment for debt and to punish fraudulent debtors,” approved
the 12th day of July, 1842, shall remain and continue a lien on the property attached
for a longer period than sixty days, from and after the time when the plaintiff might
legally have had execution issued on said judgment; but the said property shall,
after the expiration of the said time, be discharged from such attachment: Provided,
That the said property shall remain liable o be seized and taken in execution as
in other cases: And provided further, That whenever an appeal shall be entered
and taken from the judgment of the justice, the lien on the property attached
as aforesaid, shall remain for the period of sixty days after final judgment.‘
If the defendant, in case of an appeal, desire to relieve his goods from tne lien
of the attachment, he must, in addition to the usual bail on appeal, also give a
bond, under the 29th section of the act, for the forthcoming of the property attached,
to answer any execution in the case, after final judgment; in default of which, the
goods will still remain in the custody of the officer.
VII. Form OF PLAINTIFF'S AFFIDAVIT.
COUNTY OF PERRY, ss.
On this twentieth day of May 1879, before me the subscriber, one of the justices of the
peace in and for the county of Perry, personally appears A. B., and being duly sworn,
saith, that C. D. is justly indebted to him in the sum of fifty dollars, for goods sold and
delivered by this deponent to the said C. D., over and above all discounts which the said
C. D. may have against him. And that the said C. D. is about to remove his personal
Property, viz., his household furniture, from this county, with intent to defraud his
ereditors. A.B
Sworn and subscribed before me, the day and year aforesaid,
J. R., Justice of the Peace.
The terms of the affidavit may be varied according to the circumstances of the
case, by stating that the defendant has assigued and disposed of, or. that he has
secreted his property, with intent to defraud his creditors, or that he is about to do
either of these acts, with the like fraudulent intent; but care must be taken not to
state more than one cause for the attachment in the alternative, or the proceedings
will be set aside on certiorari. If the defendant has been guilty of more than one
of the acts mentioned, they should both be distinctly set forth in the conjunctive.®
VIII. Form or pLAInTIFY’s Bonp.
Know att Men by these presents, that we, A. B., BE. FB. a
i , tha . B., EB. BF. and G. H., all of
ee Perry, are held and firmly bound unto ©.'D., of the same county, a the ao ae
undred dollars, lawful money of the United States of America, to be paid to the said O,
1
Act 12 daly 1842 2 32. Purd. 1138, 4 Act 22 March 1850. Purd. 1138,
23 Gr. 319. 5
8 Act 12 July 1842 2 34. Purd. 1138, SRE ee keene wae
ATTACHMENTS. 199
D., his certain attorney, executors, administrators or assigns, to which payment well and
truly to be made, we, and each of us, do bind ourselves, and each of us, our and each of
our heirs, executors and administrators, jointly and severally, firmly by these presenta.
Sealed with our seals, dated the twentieth day of May, Anno Domini, one thousand eight
hundred and seventy-nine. Whereas, the said A. B. hath this day made application to Jd om
Esquire, one of the justices of the peace in and for the county of Perry, for an attach-
ment against the said OC. D., to recover the sum of fifty dollars, alleged to be due and
owing to the said A. B. by the said C. D. Now the condition of this obligation is such,
that if the said A. B. shall fail to recover a judgment against the said C. D. of at least
one-half the amount of this said claim, and the said A. B. shall pay to the said C. D., his
executors, administrators or assigns, all damages that shall accrue for the wrongful taking
of any property over and above an amount sufficient to satisfy the judgment and costs, in
the said sult of attachment; or if the said A. B. shall fail in bis action, and shall pay
to the said C. D. his legal costs and all damages which he may sustain by reason of said
oe then this obligation to be void, otherwise to be and remain in full force and
virtue.
Sealed and delivered in the presence of A.B. [sBau.
J.R., Justice of the Peace. ELF. [sgau.
G. H. [spat
IX. Form oF ATTACHMENT.
PERRY COUNTY, ss.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To the Constable of E—— township, or to the next constable of the said county most
convenient to the defendant, greeting:
WE commanp you that you attach C. D., by all and singular his goods and chattels, in
whose hands or possession soever the same may be found within the said county
of Perry, so that he be and appear on the twenty-fourth day of May, a. . 1879, at ten
o'clock in the forenoon, before J. R., one of our justices of the peace in and for the said
county, to answer.A. B. ina plea of debt or demand, arising from contract, either express
or implied, wherein the said plaintiff claims the sum of fifty dollars. Witness our said
justice, who hath hereunto subscribed his name, and affixed his seal, the twentieth day
of May, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and seventy-nine.
J. R., Justice of the Peace. [szat.]
The attachment must be served by the constable, by taking actual possession of
the defendant’s goods, unless a forthcoming bond be given, and by delivering to the
defendant, or leaving at his residence with an adult member of his family, or if he
be a non-resident and cannot be found, with the person in whose possession the pro-
perty may be found, a copy of the attachment, and also an inventory of the goods
attached ; all which must be specifically stated in his return, or the proceedings will
be liable to reversal on certiorari.
Return of the Constable.—By virtue of the within attachment, on the 20th day of May
1879, I attached one sofa, one bureau, and twelve mahogany chairs, of the defendant, to
whom I delivered a true copy of the said attachment, and an inventory of the goods
attached. I also return, that the defendant has given bond (hereunto annexed) for the
forthcoming of the said goods to answer any execution in this suit.
S. S., Constable.
X. FoRTHCOMING BOND.
Know aut Men by these presents, that we, C. D. and Y. Z., are held and firmly bound
unto A. B. in the sum of one hundred dollars, lawful money of the United States
of America, to be paid to the said A. B., his certain attorney, executors, administrators or
assigns ; to which payment well and truly to be made, we, and each of us, do bind our-
selves, and each of us, our and each of our heirs, executors and administrators, firmly by
these presents. Sealed with our seals, dated the 20th day of May 1879. Whereas, 8.58.,
constable of E—— township, in the county of Perry, by virtue of a writ of attachment
issued by J. R., Esquire, one of the justices of the peace in and for the said county. at
the suit of the said A. B. against the said C. D., for the sum of fifty dollars claimed by the
said A. B., has attached one sofa, one bureau, and twelve mahogany chairs, of the said
C.D. Now the condition of this obligation is such, that if in the event of the said A. B.
recovering judgment against the said C. D., in the said attachment suit, he, the said C. Pe
shall pay the amount of the said judgment with interest and costs, at the expiration af
the stay of execution given by law to freeholders, or if he shall surrender up the sai
property attached, to any officer having an execution against him on such attachment,
then this obligation to be void, or else to be and remain in full force and virtue. ;
Sealed and delivered in the presence of Cc. D. [pear
S. S., Constable. Y.Z. [span
200 ATTACHMENTS.
One surety is sufficient to this bond. If the attachment be not served personally
on the defendant, the magistrate is required to issue a summons against him, in the
usual form; and if the summons also be returned without having been personally
served, although the justice may proceed to give judgment, and issue execution
against the goods attached ; yet, if the defendant, in such case, apply for a rehear-
ing, within thirty days, and an affidavit be made that he has a just defence to the
whole or part of the claim, it is the duty of the justice to open the judgment, and
give notice to the plaintiff of the time when he will hear the parties, not less than
four, nor more than eight days distant.
XI. AFFIDAVIT TO OPEN JUDGMENT.
A. B.
vs. > Before Justice J. R.
Cc. at
C. D., the above-named defendant, being duly sworn, saith that he has a just defence
to the whole of the plaintiff’s claim in this case. C. D.
Sworn and subscribed before me, this 10th day of June, a. p. 1879.
J. R., Justice of the Peace.
XII. NovicE oF REHEARING.
A.B.
vs. } Before Justice J. R.
C. D.
C. D., the above-named defendant, having appeared before me, this tenth day of J une,
4. D. 1879, and made oath that he has a just defence to the whole of the plaintiff’s claim.
I have opened the judgment rendered against him, according to the provisions of the act
of assembly in such case made and provided, and have appointed the 15th day of June
1879, at ten o'clock in the forenvon, to hear the said parties, at which time you are hereby
required to appear before me, and make proof of your claim against the said defendant.
Witness my hand and seal, this 10th day of June, a. p. 1879.
J. R., Justice of the Peace. [szat.]
To A. B., plaintiff above named.
XIII. Form or pocxer-entry.
ADAM BROWN CtviL surr.—May 24th, 1893, plaintiff appears and makes
vs, affidavit that the defendant is justly indebted to him in the sum
of $50, for goods sold and delivered, over and above all dis-
counts, &c., and that the defendant is about to remove his per-
sonal property from the county, with intent to defraud his
CHARLES DAVIS.
aie COSTS: creditors. Same day, bond filed and attachment issued, return-
pies. go, able the 28th inst., at 10 a.m. §. S., constable, returned on
Attachment : 35/oath, “Attached defendant’s good: d d i
Attachment : i goods, and served copy and in-
Ret and oath of const. | © | 22 | ventory on J. K., the person in whose possession the same were
i es - 3B found, defendant being a non-resident and not found within the
Oat tigen Magica. 10 | county: May 28th, 1893, summons issued, returnable June 2,
Me ae ee go |2t104.m. 8.8. constable, returned on oath, “Defendant, after
a diligent inquiry, cannot be found in the county.” June 2, plain-
Opening judgment : * 39/ tiff appears and claims $50 for goods sold and delivered to de-
Supersedeas 7 5B fendant. Defendant does not appear. T. 8., sworn for plaintiff.
Rote eB After hearing, judgment publicly for plaintiff, for $50 and costs.
areca iidematt 2 #20 Same day, execution issued, 8. 8., constable. June 14th, 1893,
Justin rug bail (Lonth) 2 19 defendant appears and makes oath that he has a just defence to
Receiving and paying over. -42,| the whole of plaintiffs claim. J. udgment opened and execution
Batisfaction ““. +: 10/ superseded, and notice issued to plaintiff to appear on the 15th
ieee anak wl Dlnintlit personally.” Ser nasaretuaped on oath, Served on
Rerving attachment =, H nally. , 1593, parties appear. T.S,
Berving summons. | | gy {SWOrn for plaintiff’ R.M,, sworn for defendant, After hear-
fleage + + 7 10/ing, judgment publicly for plaintiff, for $50 and
ae é and costs. Same
Mileage ois > £0) day, defendant enters bail for stay of execution. Bail justified.
Micoge °° =: + ~~ + 80) T am held in $100, conditioned for the payment of this judg-
‘__| ment, in the event that the defendant fail to pay the same at the
$1.15 | expiration of six months from the rendition thereof.
Signed . EB.
Dec. 10th, 1893, money paid into we oF Se adiiad i
Received satisfaction.
(Signed) Apam Brown.
[ 201 ]
Attachment in Execution,
VII. Interrogatories to garnishee.
I. Acts regulating attachments in execution.
VIII. Rule on garnishee to answer.
II. What may be attached in execution.
III. Proceedings on attachments in execution. IX. Answers of garnishee.
IV. Attachment to levy debts. X. Execution against garnishee.
V. Affidavit to levy stock. XI. Docket-entry.
VI. Recognisance.
I. Act or 16 June 1836. Purd. 834.
Sxcr. 32. The proceedings to levy an execution upon stock, debts and deposits
of money belonging or due to the defendant, shall be as follows, to wit :
In the case of stock, if it shall be held in another name! than that of the real
owner thereof, the plaintiff shall file in the office of the prothonotary of the court
[or justice], an affidavit, stating that he verily believes such stock to be really the
property of the defendant, and shall enter into a recognisance with two sufficient
sureties, conditioned for the payment of such damages, as the court [or justice]
may adjudge to the party to whom such stock shall really belong, in case such stock
should not be the property of the defendant.”
Szcr. 33 Upon the filing of such an affidavit and recognisance, it shall be lawful
for the prothonotary [or justice] to issue process, in the nature of an attachment,
against such stock, with a clause of summons to the person in whose name the same
may be held, in the nature of a writ of scire facias against garnishees in a foreign
attachment, and thereupon the plaintiff may proceed to judgment, execution and
sale of the said stock, in the manner allowed in cases of foreign attachment against
personal estate.
Szct. 34. The like proceedings may be had against stock owned by a defendant,
and held in his own name, without the affidavit and recognisance aforesaid ; and
if any person shall claim to be the owner of such stock, he may, upon filing an
affidavit that the stock is really his property, and entering into a recognisance with
two sufficient sureties, conditioned for the payment of such damages as the court
[or justice] may adjudge to the plaintiff, if such stock should really belong to the
defendant ; the court [or justice] shall admit him to become a party upon the record,
and take defence, in like manner as if he
1 Where the defendant holds stock in his own
name the proceedings may be under the act 29
March 1819 3 2 (Purd. 748), which provides that
such stock shall be liable to be taken in execution
and sold, in the same manner as other goods and
chattels, subject to any debt due by the defendant
to the company. 16 Penn. St. 295. Or the plain-
tiff may proceed by attachment, under this act.
50 Ibid. 314. 4 Phila. 29.
2 The third section of the act of 29 March 1819,
which has been partially supplied by the acts
in the text, but which may be useful in constru-
ing the laws now in force, provided as follows:
“ Whereas, it sometimes happens that the stock
of such bodies corporate is held in another name
or names than those of the real owner or owners
thereof, and it is just that stock so held should
ba made liable for the debt of the real owner
cr owners; therefore,——Whenever any plaintiff or
creditor shall file an affidavit with the prothono-
tary of the court, alderman or magistrate, in
which or before whom such plaintiff or creditor
has instituted, or is about to institute, a suit,
stating that he verily believes such stock to be
really and bond fide the property of the debtor
against whom such suit has been, or is about to
be brought, and also shall enter into a recognisance
with two sufficient sureties, conditioned for the
payment of such damages, as such court, alderman
or magistrate may adjudge to the party or parties
to whom such stock shall really belong, in case
was made garnishee in the writ.
such stock should not be the property of such
debtor; it shall and may be lawful for such court,
alderman or magistrate to cause to be issued
process in the nature of a foreign attachment
against such stock, and to summon as garuishee
the person or persons in whose name or names
the same shall be held, and proceed against the
said stock and such garnishee, in all respects in
the same manner as by the laws of this common-
wealth proceedings now are or hereafter may be
prescribed in cases of foreign attachments against
personal estate; and upon judgment being had
in favor of the plaintiff in any such suit, execu-
tion may issue immediately for the sale of such
stock, in the same manner that goods and chattels
are sold on writs of fiert facias: Provided, that
in case of a judgment before a justice of the
peace or alderman, where the amount in contro-
versy shall exceed five dollars and thirty-three
cents, an appeal shall be allowed to the court of
common pleas, agreeably to the same rules and
regulations now or hereafter to be prescribed for
granting appeals in other cases cognisable before
a justice of the peace.” Purd. 748. It will be
perceived that this act enables a creditor to attach
stock held in the name of another person than
the real owner, not only where he has obtained a
judgment, but also by original process of attach-
ment, where he is about to institute a suit against
the defendant, on making the affidavit, and giv-
ing the security therein provided.
202 ATTACHMENT IN EXECUTION.
Szct. 35. In the case of a debt due to the defendant, or of a deposit of money
made by him, or of goods or chattels pawned, pledged or demised as aforesaid, the
same may be attached and levied in satisfaction of the judgment in the manner
allowed in the case of a foreign attachment, but in such case, a clause in the nature
of a scire facias against a garnishee in a foreign attachment, shall be inserted in
such writ of attachment, requiring such debtor, depositary, bailee, pawnee, or person
holding the demise as aforesaid, to appear at the next term of the court, or at such
other time as the court [or justice] from which such process may issue shall appoint,
and show cause why such judgment shall not be levied of the effects of the defendant
in his hands.
Szcr. 36. It shall be the duty of the officer charged with the execution of such
writ, to serve a copy thereof upon the defendant in such judgment.’ and upon
every person and corporation within his proper county named in the said writ of
attachment, in the manner provided for the service of a writ of summons in a
personal action.
Sect. 37. From and after the service of such writ, all stock belonging to the
defendant in the corporation upon which service shall be so made, and all debts and
deposits of money, and all other effects belonging or due to defendant by the person
or corporation upon which service shall be made, shall remain attached in the hands
of such corporation or person, in the manner heretofore practised and allowed in the
case of foreign attachment.
Szor. 38. If judgment shall be given for the plaintiff in such attachment, it shall
be lawful for him to have execution thereof as follows, to wit :
If the property attached be stock in a corporation as aforesaid, the execution shall
be by a writ of jieri facias [the common execution issued by justices], against the
original defendant, by virtue of which such stock, or so much thereof as shall be
necessary to satisfy the judgment and costs, may be sold by the sheriff [or constable],
as in other cases.
If the property attached be a deposit in money or a debt due as aforesaid,
execution shall be had in the manner allowed in the case of effects in the hands of
a garnishee in a foreign attachment?
Act 13 Aprit 1848. Purd. 836.
Sect. 10. All legacies given [and lands devised] to any person or persons, and
any interest which any person or persons may have in [real or] personal estate
of-any decedent, by will or otherwise, which are subject to foreign attachment by the
act of 27th of July 1842, entitled “an act to enable creditors to attach legacies and
property in the hands of executors and adminisirators, and for other purposes,”®
shall be subject to be attached and levied upon, in satisfaction of any judgment, in
the same manner as debts due are made subject to execution by the 32d section
of the act of 16th June 1836, entitled “ an act relating to executions 3? Provided,
That the plaintiff in said judgment shall tender to the garnishee or garnishees,
if he or they be executors or administrators, a bond with sufficient security, as is
provided by the second section of the said act of 27th of July 1842 :* and the
1 By the subsequent act of 20 March 1845
(Purd. 833), service on the defendant is dispensed
with, where he resides out of the county, or ser-
Vice cannot be effected on him by the officer within
his bailiwick.
? The 59th and 60th sections of the act of 13
June 1836 (Purd. 934), provide that in case of
foreign attachment, “ after a verdict for the plain-
tiff in any scire facius, as aforesaid, it shall be
lawful for him to have execution of his judgment
in the attachment, to be levied of the goods and
the garnishee shall neglect or refuse, upon the
lawful demand of the proper officers, to produce
and deliver the goods and effects of the defendant,
as aforesaid, or to pay the debt or duty attached,
if the same shall be due and payable.”
_ § Purd. 931. This act contains a proviso, that
its provisions “shall not extend to legacies and
distributive shares of married women,” which are
likewise protected by the act of 11 April 1848.
Purd. 1258. 7
4 Purd. 931.
effects so found in the hands or possession of the
garnishee, or of so much of them as shall be suf-
ficient to satisfy his demand, with legal costs of
suit and charges, as aforesaid. The plaintiff may
also at the same time have execution against the
garnishee upon the judgment obtained against him
on a scire facias, as in the caso of a judgment
against him for his Proper debt, to be executed if
This act provides that a bond
shall be given, with sufficient security, to be
approved by the court, in double the amount to
be received from such garnishee, with like condi-
tions as are presoribed in the 41st section of the
act of 24 February 1834 (Purd. 618.), to wit: that
if any debt or demand shall afterwards be reco-
vered against the estate of the decedent, or other-
wise be duly made to appear, he will »efund the
ATTACHMENT IN EXECUTION. 203
same rights in all respects which the debtor may have, and no greater whatever, are
hereby placed within the power of the attaching-creditor,
Aot 20 Maron 1845. Purd. 838.
Szor. 4. So much of the act of assembly passed 16th day of June 1836, entitled
“an act relating’ to executions,” as provides for the levy and recovery of stock,
deposits, and debts due to defendants by process of attachment and scire fucias, is
hereby extended to all cases of attachments to be issued upon judgments against
corporations (other than municipal corporations),? and from and after the passage
of this act, all such process which hereafter may be issued, may be proceeded unto
final judgment and execution, in the same manner and under the same rules and
regulations as are directed against corporations by the provisions of the act of 16th
June 1836, relating to executions ;? and so much of the 36th section of the act of
16th June 1836, as requires service of the attachment on any defendant, be and
the same is hereby repealed, except where the defendant is a resident of the county
in which the attachment issued.
Aor 15 Aprin 1845. Purd. 1147.
Sect. 1. The jurisdiction of aldermen and justices of the peace is hereby ex-
tended to the issuing, service, trial, judgment and execution of all process required
by the 32d, 33d, 34th, 35th, 36th, 37th and 38th sections of the act relating to
executions, passed the 16th day of June 1836.
Secr. 2. Any alderman or justice of the peace, before whom any judgment
remains unsatisfied, and an execution has been returned, “ no goods,” may, on the
application of the plaintiff, and his compliance with the requisitions of the act to
which this is a supplement, issue an attachment, in the nature of an execution, as
therein provided, to levy upon stock, debts and deposits of money belonging or
due to the defendant, in satisfaction of such judgment.
Sxot. 3. The said writ of attachment may be issued, returnable not less than
four, nor more than eight days, and shall be served in the manner pointed out for
the service of a summons, upon the debtor, depositary, bailee, pawnee, or other
person having property of the defendant in his hands, made liable to attachment
by the act to which this is a supplement ; and on or before the return-day of said
writ, the plaintiff may file with the magistrate interrogatories in writing, addressed
to the person summoned as garnishee, in regard to the property and effects of the
defendant alleged to be in his hands at the time of the service of said writ; a copy
of the same, with a rule to answer, shall be served upon said garnishee personally,
to answer, under oath or affirmation, all such interrogatories as the magistrate shall
deem proper and pertinent, within eight days after the same shall be served.
Szor. 4. If such garnishee shall neglect or refuse to answer said interrogatories
within eight days (unless for cause shown, the time has been extended), he shall
be adjudged to have in his possession property of the defendant equal in value to
the demand of the said plaintiff; and judgment may be rendered by default against
said garnishee for the amount of the same, with costs.
Sxcr. 5. If the said garnishee, in his answers, admit that there is in his posses-
sion or control, property of the defendant liable under said act to attachment, then
said magistrate may enter judgment specially, to be levied out of the effects in the
hands of the garnishee, or so much of the same as may be necessary to pay the debt
and costs: Provided, however, 'That the wages of any laborer, or the salary of any
ratable part of such debt or demand, and of the
tosts and charges attending the recovery of
fhe same,”
1 See act 10 April 1849, infra.
2 See 3 Pitts. i. J. 92.
8 The 72d section of this act (Purd. 431) directs
that “all executions which shall be issued, from
any court of record, against any corporation not
being a county, township or other public corporate
body, shall command the sheriff or other officer,
to Jevy the sum recovered, together with the costs
of suit, of the goods and chattels, lands and tene-
ments of such corporation.” It is confined by its
terms to executions issued from a court of record;
an execution issued by a justice in an attachment
in execution upon a judgment against a corpora-
tion should be in the usual form, and command
the constable to levy the sum recovered of the
goods and chattels, moneys, rights and credits
of the corporation attached, in the hands of
the garnishee, &c. Under the act of 1845, the
funds of an insolvent canal company may be
attached in the hands of their banker; and it
is no defence that the banker is also a creditor of
the corporation. 36 Penn. St. 214.
204 ATTACHMENT IN EXECUTION.
person in public or private employment, shall not be liable to attachment in the
hands of the employer.’ ;
Sxor. 6. The plaintiff, the defendant, or the garnishee in the attachment, may
appeal from the judgment of the alderman or justice of the peace, to the next
term of the court of common pleas, on complying with the provisions of the laws
regulating appeals in other cases: Provided, That the fees allowed to justices and
aldermen, and constables, under this act shall be the same as allowed by the general
fee-bill for similar services in other cases.
Act 10 Aprin 1849. Purd. 837.
Szcr. 11. The 10th section of the act of 13th April, Anno Domini 1843, entitled
“an act to convey certain real estate, and for other purposes” (providing that all
legacies given, and lands devised to any person or persons, and any interest which
any person or persons may have in the real or personal estate of any decedent by
will or otherwise, which are subject to foreign attachment by the act of the 27th
of July, Anno Domini 1842, entitled ‘an act to enable creditors to attach legacies
and property in the hands of executors and administrators, and for other purposes,’
shall be subject to be attached and levied upon in satisfaction of any judgment, in
the same manner as debts due are made subject to execution by the 22d section
of the act of 16th June, Anno Domini, 1836, entitled ‘an act relative to execu-
tions’) shall be deemed to authorize the issuing and service of process in the nature
of attachment, at any time after the interest which any person or persons may have
in the real or personal estate of any decedent, shall have accrued by reason of the
death of such decedent: Provided, That a sale of the aforesaid interest of the de-
fendant in the proceeding by attachment, authorized by the aforesaid 10th section
of [the act of ] 13th of April, Anno Domini 1843, shall not be compelled by any
process of execution, until a year shall have elapsed from the time when the interest
aforesaid vested in the defendant, unless the executors or administrators of the
decedent shall have sooner filed their account. Inall cases when executors, admin-
istrators or trustees of the estates of decedents shall have been made garnishees in
the process in the nature of attachment authorized by the 10th section of the act
of 13th of April, Anno Domini 1843, entitled ‘an act to convey certain real
estate, and for other purposes,” they shall be entitled to their costs, as well as the
expenses necessarily incurred by them in attending to the proceeding in which they
may have been garnishees.
Il. WHAT MAY BE ATTACHED IN EXECUTION.
Whenever a party has a right of action, his creditors may attach it, unless it be
for wages.” Debts in suit and unsatisfied judgments may be attached 3° although
the judgment was recovered in another state. So may debts due in presenti, but
payable in futuro ;> a debt due to a non-resident, if the garnishee be within reach
of our process ;° a debt payable in city bonds ;? claims payable in specific articles ;°
a note deposited in pawn ;? an over-due note, in the hands of the maker 3° anda
note not matured." So also, the proceeds of a fund in the hands of trustees, may
be attached ; the proceeds of property in the hands of an assignee, under a void
assignment ;" a loss incurred on a policy of insurance ;* and the moiety of the cost
of a party-wall.¥
Money in the hands of an attorney-at law, may be attached for the debt of his
client ;* and money in the hands of the debtor’s banker.” But money levied by a
1 A waiver of tho benefit of this proviso, in a will enjoin the holder from negotiating it. Ibid.
promissory note, is void, and confers no jurisdic. 1 7. & H. Pr. 21183. But the attachment will
tion on a justice. 49 Penn. St. 387, not avail as against a holder to whom it was in-
2 36 Penn. St. 28. Seo 103 Ibid. 546. dorsed, after the attach i ice, 29
2 Dall. 277, 2M.130. 1 Penn, St. 380. Montes, SI
* 81 Penn. St. 114, 12 36 Penn. St. 128.
2 Dall. 212. 17 Ponn. St. 440, 18 Ibid. 388. 18 5 W. & $. 103, 5 Penn. St. 39. 13 Tbid. 307.
& 80 Peon. St. 520, 34 Ibid. 152 or
id. 229. “TW. & 8.76, 8Tbid. 350. 2 Clark 70. 45
a 1W.N, C. 298, 2 Ibid. 158. But not a due- Penn. St. 129. 4 Phila, 286. ; = ;
eal ee a Sr 96 Penn, St. 150. 16 9 Penn. St. 501
enn. St. 39. 16 id. ¢ 3 Ibi
1917. & H. Pr. 91183, W ew a eee
3118 Penn. St. 388. And in such case, the court
ATTACHMENT IN EXECUTION. 205
sheriff or constable upon an execution cannot be attached ;! nor money in the
hands of a prothonotary ;? or of a justice of the peace ;* or of an assignee in bank-
ruptey ;* nor the money of a convict in the hands of the warden of the peniten-
tiary ;> nor money in the hands of a debtor of a decedent ;* nor the surplus in the
hands of a constable, after a sale under a distress for rent.’ But where the defend.
ant in an execution requested the sheriff, in making sale of his personal property
to sell the exempted articles for his (the defendant’s) benefit, which was done:
the cvurt held, that the proceeds were liable to attachment in the hands of the
sheriff.® So also, if the defendant himself sell the property exempt from execution
the money is liable to attachment in the hands of the purchaser; and so are the
damages recovered by him in an action of trespass for taking it in execution, for
such recovery transfers the right of property and has the effect of a sale? But
money awarded to a defendant, out of the proceeds of his real estate, under the
exemption law, and paid over to his attorney by the sheriff, is not liable to be
attached in the hands of his attorney.”
The fees due to a juror cannot be attached ;" or those due to any public officer.”
Nor the salary of a public officer; nor money held by the treasurer of a board of
school directors ;“ or by a supervisor of a state canal and railroad ;* nor the com-
missions of an executor, in his own hands or those of his co-executor.6 Nor cana
bequest to a wife be attached for the debt of her husband ;" or damages recovered
in the joint names of husband and wife, for an injury to the person of the wife,
during coverture.* Nor can a municipal corporation be made garnishee ;” or a
foreign corporation ; unless authorized to transact business in this state. But
although debts due by the federal, state and municipal governments cannet be
attached in their hands, yet the bonds of a municipal corporation, belonging to a
debtor, may be attached in the hands of a third person and sold, in the same manner
as stocks, in discharge of the execution.”
A certificate of stock in a bank in another state, sent to an individual here, with
authority to sell it, is not subject to attachment, under the laws of this state.? So,
the capital stock of a bank, owned by itself, and in its own possession, whether
acquired by purchase or otherwise, is not subject to an attachment in execution, for
a debt due by the bank.* Neither can an attachment against a railroad company
be levied on money in the hands of the ticket-agents ; they are not deemed third
parties with respect to such moneys.” An attachment may issue against a fraudulent
grantee of chattels ;%° but not against one who has but a lien upon the property.”"s
An attaching-creditor stands in the shoes of the debtor; and any equities that
could be set up against the latter, are equally available against the former.” Thus,
where a note has been assigned and transferred bond fide in payment of a debt,
before the service of an attachment, the assignee is entitled to the money, and not
the attaching-creditor.® And after a bond jide assignment of a judgment, it is
not liable to be attached for the debt of the assignor. A draft upon a particular
fund in the hands of an attorney for collection, is an equitable assignment of it;
and although not accepted by the attorney, yet it is not afterwards subject to be
12 W.& 8.400. 13 Penn. St. 307. 1 Clark 1% 1 Clark 260. And see 4 How. 20.
257. Ibid. 411. 1 Leg. Gaz. 53. 16 47 Penn. St. 94. ; :
2-1 Dall. 354. 172 W.90. 1 Whart.179. 81 Pitts. L. J. 23.
34 W. & S.342. Or money in the hands of 8 3 Clark 60.
county commissioners. 40 Leg. Int. 272. 19 29 Penn. St.173. 17. & H. Pr. 1187, 1
41W.N. C. 230. Pitts. 1, 1 Kulp 180. Ibid. 216. See 3 W.N. 0,
5 16 Ibid. 147. 274,
6 3 Clark 511. 2Dall.73. Ibid. 97. 8 Phila. 27. & H. Pr. 3 2258.
269. 21 96 Penn. St. 485.
7 Comfort v. Taylor, Com. Pleas, Phila., March 22 41 Ibid. 229.
1848. 23 13 Ibid. 223.
8 2 Clark 452. 24 10 W. 230.
9 23 Penn. St. 489. 2% 35 Penn. St.22. And see 36 Ibid. 214. 64
10 31 Ibid. 329. Ibid. 236.
ll 2 Clark 438, % 2 Gr. 319.
12 48 Penn. St. 570. Otherwise, of asuccessful % 3 Phila. 219. And see 9 Ww. N.C. 503.
plaintiff’s bill of costs for witness’ fees and mileage. °8 34 Penn. St. 299. 18 Ibid. 96. 37 Ibid. 491,
102 Penn. St. 220. See 103 Ibid. 115. 99 Ibid. 604.
182M. 330. § ts 15 April 1845 2 5 and 29 1 Ibid. 263. ;
8 May 1876, Purd. 2077. Be é 80 Bavington v. Alcock, Dist. Court, Phila.,
14 3 Penn. St. 368, Dec., 1848,
206 ATTACHMENT IN EXECUTION.
attached for the debt of the drawer.’ But where a check on a bank was not pre-
sented until several days after its date, and in the mean time, an attachment in
execution was laid upon the funds of’ the drawer, in the bank, it was held, that the
latter was entitled to preference, and that the holder of the check must be post-
oned.? So, where the defendants drew bills on their factor for a larger amount
than the balance in his hands, and the latter declined to accept, unless he were
placed in funds, which was not done by the defendants, and an attachment was
subsequently levied on the balance in the hands of the factor; it was held, that the
attaching-creditor was entitled to the fund to the exclusion of the holder of the bills?
If the garnishee receive money of the debtor, after the service of the writ, it is
bound by the attachment.* The attachment operates as a statutory assignment of
the fund. :
A partnership debt may be attached in the hands of the garnishee, for the private
debt of one of the partners ; and the garnishee will be compelled to pay over to the
separate creditor the proportion of the indebted partner.6 Buta balance due on
an unsettled partnership account cannot be attached.” An attachment in execu-
tion cannot be issued on a judgment against a municipal corporation.®
Under the acts of 1843 and 1849, the interest of any legatee or devisee in the
estate of a decedent, may be attached in the hands of the executors or adminis-
trators ;° or in the hands of a testamentary trustee ; or of a purchaser of the real
estate, under a sale made by the administrator, he having filed an accoant prior to
the sale, showing a balance in favor of the estate? But such attachment does not
bind the defendant’s interest in the real estate descended. Such attachment may
be laid on the fund in whose hands or possession soever the same may be; as the
executor’s agent, who received the defendant’s share of the proceeds of real estate!
The attachment of a legacy in the hands of an executor, transfers the right to
receive it to the attaching-creditor, subject to the rights of the garnishee; if the
legatee be indebted to the estate of the testator to an amount exceeding the legacy
given to him, the executor has the same right to set off such indebtedness against
the attaching-creditor, as he would have had against the legatee.* But the admin-
istrator cannot set off a judgment held in his own right against the legatee.%
The act of 15th April 1845 provides, that the wages of any laborer, or the salary of
any person in public or private employment, shall not be liable to attachment in the
hands of the employer. This is a general law applicable to all judgments whether
rendered in the common pleas or in a justice’s court.” And the exemption cannot
be waived by the contract between the parties.® Wages, however, are made attach-
able for claims for board, not exceeding four weeks, by act 8th May 1876: and by the
same statute, jurisdiction is conferred upon justices of the peace to issue such
attachments.” The act of 1845 is intended to protect and secure to the laborer
what is earned by his own hands, not the contracts of those who make profit out of
the labor of others.” But the wages of a miner, who, by his own labor, mines coal
at a certain price per ton, and employs a common laborer to assist him at so much
per day, are not attachable.? And where, by agreement, the wages of a laborer are
to be credited as part payment on a parol contract for the sale of land, which is sub-
sequently repudiated by the vendor, they still remain the wages of labor, and as
such are not liable to be attached.” But if a master carpenter is to receive from his
employer, for the labor of his hands, more than the wages paid by him to them,
such profits are attachable in the hands of the employer.
The laws of the United States provide, that ‘no sum of money due, or to become
8W.&S. 9,
2 M. 327.
I Clark 367,
8 W. 420. 20 Penn. St, 412
; 15 38 Ibid. 93.
8
4
* 103 Penn. St. 115,
7
8
16 Purd. 2077. A duo-bill given for wages can-
not be attached, though assigned to a third person,
1 Kulp 282. But the act of 1883 (Purd.2074) has
repealed this exemption as to judgments for $50
or less, obtained also for wages. 4 Kulp 56.
17 29 Penn. St. 264, 33 Ibid. 241.
18 49 Ibid. 387. 2 W.N.C, 79,
19 Purd 2077, This act does not deprive the
defendant of the benefit of th i *
101 Penn. St. 402. Seger
20 5 Penn. St. 117,
50 Ibid. 216.
2 Dall. 277, 2 Y. 190.
65 Penn. St. 126,
Purd. 838. 4 Ponn. St. 490, 3 Pitts, L. J. 92
97 W. & 8.376. 15 Penn. St. 103, id.
93. 43 Ibid. 89. eee
10 36 Penn. St. 28. 46 Ibid, 485.
111 Ibid. 361. 15 Ibid. 103,
2 94 Ibid. 186.
5 Whart, 125,
18 18 Ibid. 414.
14 35 Penn, St. 333.
21 33 Ibid. 241,
22 36 Ibid. 342.
33 49 Ibid. 147.
Sa seer
iO
ATTACHMENT IN EXECUTION. 207
due, to any pensioner, shall be liable to attachment, levy or seizure, by or under any
legal or equitable process whatever, whether the same remain with the pension office,
or any officer or agent thereof, or in the course of transmission to the pensioner
entitled thereto, but shall inure wholly to the benefit of such pensioner! So long
as pension money remains in the hands of the pensioner, for his own use, it cannot
be reached by his creditors, by any process whatever. Nor can it be attached in
the hands of a bank in which he has deposited it® But if a pension draft is placed
in a bank for collection and the bank credits it as cash, it is no longer in transitu.’
And property purchased with pension money is clearly liable to the claims of
creditors.
III. PRocEEDINGS ON ATTACHMENT IN EXECUTION.
An attachment in execution may issue on a judgment recovered more than five
years before, without a scire facias, if a fiert facias has been issued within the
five years ;° in the attachment, the defendant has a day in court, in which he can take
any defence he could have made on a secire facias.?' It is rightly instituted in the
county where the garnishee resides.®
In a writ of attachment in execution, it is not necessary to state the kind or nature
of the property to be attached ; it is sufficient, if the writ command the sheriff (or
constable) to attach “the goods and chattels, rights, credits and moneys,” of the
defendant, in the hands of the garnishee*® The debtor himself must be made the
garnishee, not merely the person who holds the evidence of the debt ; nor one who
has merely a lien on the property." Several garnishees may be joined in one writ.”
And a fraudulent grantee of chattels may be made garnishee.”
An attachment, under the act of 1836, is process to enforce the judgment, and
it is, in substance, if not in form, an execution: it differs from a fiert factas, essen-
tially, only in this, that it reaches effects from which the debt could not otherwise
be levied. It cannot issue on an award of arbitrators, till the twenty days allowed
for an appeal have expired.* The defendant may claim the benefit of the exemption
law as against such writ. It is not exclusively a proceeding in rem, but is also a
proceeding personally against the garnishee.* The garnishee may accept service,
where a manual seizure by the sheriff is not required.” :
The answers of the garnishee need not be sworn to before the justice who issued
the attachment; they may be sworn to before any other magistrate."* A garnishee
in an attachment in execution is not necessarily obliged to annex to his answers
copies of the correspondence between him and the defendant ; and, in general, the
court will relieve him from so doing.® Irrelevant interrogatories need not be
answered.” Garnishees admitted in their answers, that they held property of the
defendant more than sufficient to pay a debt which defendant owed them, if
certain commercial adventures turned out well: held, that plaintiff was not entitled
to judgment.”
The plaintiff is only required, on the trial, to prove such a case, as would have
entitled the defendant to recover, in a suit by him against the garnishee.” ;
A garnishee may set off a cross-demand against the defendant in the execution ;
but the set-off must have been acquired before the service of the attachment, and
the burden of proving that his right of set-off was acquired before the attachment
was laid, rests on the garnishee; there is no presumption existing In the case.
Where a debt is attached after it has been assigned, the garnishees may give notice
11R.8. 3 4749.
215 Phila. 646. 2 Chest. Co. R. 493. And
therefore, a voluntary gift of it to his wife can-
not be deemed a fraudulent transfer. 15 Phila.
646,
316 W.N. C. 239; contra, 3 L. Law Rev. 65.
414W.N. C, 513,
5 2 Chest. Co. R. 492.
6 14 W.N. C. 550. 7
7 4 Penn. St. 232. 5 Ibid.115. 7 W. &S. 44.
87 W. & 8. 432.
96 Whart. 181. The writ may be amended.
6 W.N. C. 551.
0 25 Penn. St. 362.
1 3 Phila, 219.
12 3 Phila. 35.
18 2 Gr. 319.
14 13 Penn. St. 394.
15 38 Ibid. 190. 44 Ibid. 206. 52 Ibid. 423. 3
@r. 319. 9 Phila. 510. 14 Pitts. L. J. 23.
16 29 Penn. St. 396.
Ww 13 W.N. C. 78. .
18 Minhinnick v. Long, Com. Pleas, Phila., Deo.
1847.
19 2 Clark 306.
20 41 Leg. Int. 14.
21 2 Clark 325. is
22 40 Penn. St. 248. 5
2 13 Ibid. 552. See 34 Ibid. 299. 36 Ibid. 214.
37 Ibid. 491. 38 Ibid. 217.
'
208 ATTACHMENT IN EXECUTION.
of the attachment to the assignee, who must then come in and ‘defend for his
interest, or be for ever barred." Where a judgment debt has been aiashed, the
court will stay proceedings until the determination of the attachment suit. ;
If the garnishee in an attachment in execution make default, by not appearing
after due service of the writ, judgment ought not to be given against him, to be
levied of his goods and chattels, &c. The judgment ought to be, that the plaintiff
have execution of so much of the debts, &c., due by the garnishee to the defendant,
and attached in his hands, as may satisfy the judgment of the plaintiff, with
interest and costs; and if the garnishee refuse or neglect, on demand by the sheriff
[or constable], to pay the same, then the same to be levied of his, the garnishee’s
goods and chattels, according to law, as in the case of a judgment against him for his
own proper debt ; and that the garnishee be thereupon discharged, as against the de-
fendant, of the sum so attached and levied, &.° A judgment for the garnishee in an
attachment in execution, on Ais answer, is improper; the court [or justice] can do
no more than refuse judgment for the plaintiff.
The garnishee is not liable to the plaintiff for costs, beyond the amount attached
in his hands, unless it be proved that there are effects of the defendant in his hands
to a larger amount than he admits in his-answer ; but if more is proved, then the
costs must be paid by the garnishee.© By the provisions of the act of 1705,
relating to foreign attachments, the garnishee was to be allowed, out of the effects
attached, a reasonable satisfaction for his attendance, which was held to extend to
and include not only the expenses of his attendance, but also a reasonable sum for
fees paid to counsel, for preparing his answers, and attending to his interests in the
suit.” But this section of the act of 1705 having been supplied by the act of 16th
June 1836,* which contains no such provision, this allowance is no longer to be
nade,® except where executors, administrators or trustees of the estates of decedents,
are made garnishees, who, by act of 10th April 1849, are to be allowed their costs
and expenses necessarily incurred by them in attending to the proceeding in which
they may have been garnishees."
A garnishee in an attachment in execution, who, to interrogatories of the plaintiff,
files his answers, is entitled to recover his costs, where the plaintiff, not content with
his answers, suffers a nonsuit, after compelling him to plead and prepare for trial.™
In an attachment in execution, several garnishees were summoned, and separate
issues taken by each, and determined some in favor of the garnishees, and others in
favor of the attaching-creditor: held, that the issue against each garnishee was
in the nature of a separate suit, and that the garnishees were entitled to recover
full costs on the issues determined in their favor.
Where the answer of the garnishee, in an attachment in execution, shows that
he holds goods of the defendant which have been pawned, pledged or demised to
him, the court, construing the whole act relating to executions together, will award
that, upon the judgment, a fieri facias should issue, under the provisions of the 23d
section, ordering the goods to be sold subject to the rights of the pawnee, who,
upon payment of his claim, would be compelled to yield possession to the sheriff’s
vendee.¥ Hxecution against the stock of a corporation held by a defendant in his
own name, may be either by a writ of fiert facias, under the act of 29th March 1819 se
or by attachment under the act of 1836.8
The legal effect of an attachment laid upon a debt is, to restrain the garnishee
1 Willook v. Neel, Dist. Court, Allegheny, Dec. in any attachment-execution, or scire facias in
cy Cities ih foreign attachment, issued out of any court of
ila, 177, . / record of this state, the garnishee shall be found
6 Whart. 181. See 38 Ibid. 93. 41 Ibid. 229. to have in his possession or control no real or
Where executors are garnishees, it is error to personal property of the defendant, nor to owe
Lin eo against them de bonis propriis. fim any debt, the said garnishee shall be entitled
I ae en to recover from the plaintiff, in addition to the
Po ten a : ae . costs allowed by law, a reasonable counsel fee not
464 fi ‘ 7 . 446. Bright. Costs exceeding ten dollars, to be determined by the
: court, and taxed as part of the costs. Purd. 838
618, M.46. See act 29 April Phos
7188. & R. 226, 2M. 15, fT Pena, St i
urd. 929. 18 Magruder v. Adams, 1 T. & H. Pr. 3 925
* 9 Penn. St. 468. M7 Phila. 307. Lamb v. ee T.&
10 Purd. 837. H. Pr. 3 1209. B i
eles i t
1 Tho act 11 June 1885, provides, that where 15 ad. 838, 16 ae 206 Pag
16 AN Pann St 214 A Dhitn 90 ‘
ATTACHMENT IN EXECUTION. 208 .
from paying over the money either to his individual creditor or to the attaching-
creditor, until the attachment is disposed of, and then only according to the result
of that proceeding." Assignment of a debt, either actual or by operation of law, as
by an attachment in execution, carries with it the right to use all securities for its
recovery.”
The pendencey of an attachment is no bar to an action against the garnishee, at the
suit of a legal holder of the debt attached ; it neither abates nor bars an action ;
pleading it has on y the effect of giving notice of the claim, and enabling the court
[or justice] to mou d the judgment so as to protect the parties’ rights.
A verdict and judgment against the garnishee in an attachment-execution is not
conclusive, in a subsequent action by the trustees in insolvency of the defendant in
the execution, against the garnishee.‘ And a judgment in favor of the garnishee
is no bar to a subsequent attachment at the suit of another creditor.© A plaintiff
may issue a second attachment, whilst a former one is pending and undetermined®
IV. ATTACHMENT TO LEVY DEBTS.
COUNTY OF POTTER, ss.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To the Constable of E township, or to the next constable of the said county, most
convenient to the defendant, greeting :
We command you that you attach C. D., by all and singular his goods and chattels,
rights, moneys and credits, in whose hands or possession soever the same may be, so that
he be and appear before J. R., Esquire, one of our justices of the peace in and for the
said county, on the 28th day of June, a. p. 1880, at four o’clock in the afternoon, to
answer A. B. And also, that you make known to E. F., that he be and appear before
our said justice, on and at the same day and hour, to show if anything they, or either of
them, have, or has, or know, to say why a certain judgment recovered before our said
justice, on the first day of May, a. p. 1880, against the said C. D., by the said A. B., for
the sum of twenty dollars, besides costs of suit, which judgment remains unsatisfied, shall
not be levied of the effects of the said C. D. in the hands of the said E. F.; and have you
then there this writ. Witness our said justice, who hath hereunto set his hand and seal,
this twentieth day of June, a. p. 1880. J. R., Justice of the Peace. [snat.]
This attachment must be served on the garnishee in the same manner as a sum-
mons, and should also be served on the defendant, if he can be found within the
county.
Return of the Constable.—Served on the within-named C. D. and E. F., respectively,
on the 21st day of June 1880, by leaving a copy of the said attachment at their respective
dwelling-houses, in the presence of one of their families respectively.
8S. S., Constable.
In the case of attachment of stock, if held in another name than that of the
real owner, the plaintiff must (before suing out the above writ) file in the office of
the magistrate an affidavit, and enter into recognisance in the following form, viz. :
V. AFFIDAVIT.
E. F.
vs. + Debt not exceeding $100.
A.B
LYCOMING COUNTY, ss.
Berore mz, one of the justices of the peace in and for the county of Lycoming, per-
sonally appeared E. F., the plaintiff above named, who, being duly sworn according to
law, deposeth and saith, that there are ten shares of stock of the Lehigh Bank, held in the
name of R. S., of the city of Pittsburgh, but which said shares the said deponent verily
believes are really the property of the above-named A. B. And further saith ne if
8 d subscribed before me, this 10th day of May, a. p. 1880.
Se neat etree ERY a eT M., Justice of the Peace.
13 Penn. St. 109. 4 35 Penn. St. 308.
; 4 Ibid. 248. And see 103 Ibid. 115. ; 29 Ibid. 396, 51 Ibid. 387. 4 Phila, 276.
5
1 Ibid. 357. 14 40 Ibid. 309.
210 ATTACHMENT IN EXECUTION.
VI. REcoGNISANCE.
E. F.
vs. Debt not exceeding $100.
A. B.
LYCOMING COUNTY, ss.
We, B. F., the plaintiff above named, G. F. and J. K., all of the borough of E—,, in
the county aforesaid, do acknowledge ourselves to owe and be indebted to A. B., of N—,
in the sum of fifty dollars, to be levied of our goods and chattels, lands and tenements,
respectively, to the use of the said A. B., his executors, administrators or assigns. The
condition of this recognisance is such, that whereas the said E. F. is about to sue outa
writ of attachment in the nature of an execution against the said A. B., and to attach
certain Lehigh Bank stock held in the name of R. S., of Pittsburgh, in satisfaction of
a judgment recovered against the said A. B., before L. M., one of the justices of the peace
in and for said county, for ten dollars, with costs. Now, if the said HB. F, shall and do
well and truly pay and satisfy the said R. 8., or other person to whom said stock really
belongs, for all such damages as he or they shall be adjudged to have sustained by
reason of the said attachment, or proceeding therein, in case said stock shall not be the
property of the defendant, then this recognisance to be void, otherwise to be and remain
in full force and virtue.
Taken and acknowledged before me, this 10th day of May, a. p. 1880.
L. M., Justice of the Peace.
Where stock is attached which belongs to another person than the defendant,
the owner may be admitted to become a party to the suit, and take defence in like
manner as if he had been summoned as garnishee, upon his filing an affidavit that
the stock is really his property, and entering into a recognisance with two sureties,
conditioned for the payment of such damages as may be adjudged the plaintiff,
if the stock should really belong to the defendant. The above form of affidavit and
recognisance can be readily altered to meet such a case.
VII. INTERROGATORIES TO GARNISHEE.
A.B Before Justice J. R.
ae Attachment in Execution. ;
KB. Garnishes af & DD. oe to be answered by garnishee, filed June 20th,
First. Do you know C. D., of whom you are garnishee in the above writ of attachment?
Second. Have you had commercial or other transactions with the said C.D? If yea,
what was the state of your accounts with the said C. D., at the time of the service of the
above writ of attachment upon you?
Third. Was there, or was there not, a balance in your hands in favor of the said C. D.,
at the time of the service of the said writ of attachment upon you? If yea, state the
amount particularly.
Fourth. Had you in your possession any goods, merchandise, moneys, rights, credits
or effects of any nature whatsoever, belonging to the said C. D., at the time of the service
of the above writ of attachment on you? If yea, state the amount of said money, and
the nature of the rights and credits, and the nature and quantity of said goods, merchan-
dise or effects. A.B
VIII. RULE ON GARNISHEE TO ANSWER.
A. B. Before Justice J. R.
D8, Attachment in Executi
E. F., Garnishee of C. D. UuOn..
Anp now June 20th, 1880, on motion of A. B., plaintiff, rule entered on the garnishee
to answer the interrogatories filed in this case, in eight days, or judgment, according to
the act of assembly in such case made and provided. Witness my hand and seal.
J. R., Justice of the Peace. [sat]
Sir: Take notice that the foregoing interrogatories, to be answered by you, have been
filed, and that a rule has been entered to answer the same in eight days from the service of
this notice ; and also, that unless your answers thereto, in writing, on oath or affirmation,
be filed in my office, within that time, judgment will be entered against you by default, for
the amount of the plaintiff's claim. J.R, i
Te Mr EF. Goenhes , Justice of the Peace.
The act of assembly requires that the copy of the interrogatories and rule to
answer should be served on the garnishee personally, If, on the return-day of the
attachment, the copy of the interrogatories and rule to answer have not been served,
at least eight days previously, on the garnishee, in person, the justice, on the appli-
ATTACHMENT IN EXECUTION. 211
cation of the plaintiff, should continue over the cause, until such time as will be
sufficient to effect the service required by law.
[X. ANSWERS OF GARNISHEE.
A. B.
ne Before Justice J. R.
EF. Gariishae of C.D. Attachment in Execution.
E, F., the garnishee above named, being duly sworn [or affirmed], saith, i
the interrogatories filed by the plaintiff 7 iia eee : ! fee eee
First. I do know the said C. D., of whom I am garnishee in the writ of attachment
issued in this case.
Second. I have had commercial transactions with the said C. D. I have purchased
goods from him. At the time of the service of the writ of attachment upon me, I was
indebted to the said C. D. in the sum of twenty dollars, for goods purchased from him.
Third. As I have already stated, in answer to the second interrogatory, there was a
balance of $20 in my hands, in favor of the said C. D., at the time of the service of the
writ of attachment.
Fourth. At the time of the service of the writ of attachment, I had not in my posses-
sion any goods, merchandise, moneys, rights, credits or effects of any nature whatever,
belonging to the said C. D., except as I have before stated in answer to the second inter-
rogatory. E. F
worn [or affirmed] and subscribed before me, this 20th day of June 1880.
J. R., Justice of the Peace.
X. EXECUTION AGAINST GARNISHEE.
POTTER COUNTY, ss.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To the Constable of E—— township, or to the next constable of the said county most
convenient to the defendant, greeting :
Wuerzas, A. B., on the second day of July 1880, before J. R., Esquire, one of our
justices of the peace in and for the said county, obtained judgment against E. F., garnishee
of C. D., for the sum of twenty dollars, to be levied of the moneys, rights and credits of
the said C. D., in the hands and possession of the said E. F., which judgment remains
unsatisfied. Therefore, we command you, that you levy the said sum of twenty dollars of
the moneys, rights and credits of the said C. D., attached in the hands of the said E. F. ;
and if the said H. F. refuse or neglect, on demand, to pay the same, then that you levy
the said sum of twenty dollars of the proper goods and chattels of the said E.F., as in the
case of a judgment against him for his own proper debt; and indorse hereon, the time you
make your levy, and hereon, or on a schedule to be hereunto annexed, a list of the same;
and within twenty days from the date hereof expose the same for sale, by public vendue,
you having given due notice thereof, by three or more advertisements put up in the most
public places in your township; and returning the overplus, if any, of the said sale, to the
said garnishee ; and of your proceedings herein, together with this execution, make return
to our said justice, on or before the twenty-second day of July 1880.
Witness our said justice, who hath hereunto set his hand and seal, this second day of
July, a. p. 1880. J. R., Justice of the Peace. [smat.]
XI. DocKEt-ENTRY.
A. B. ATTACHMENT IN EXECUTION issued June 20th, 1893, return-
vs, able ee inst. at 4 o’clock, P.M., on judgment obtained be-
: fore me by the said A. B., against the said C. D., on the Ist May
E. F, Garnishee of C. D. 1893, for $20, and costs. 8 S, constable. Same day, plff. files
interrogatories, and rule entered on garnishee to answer in eight
Costs. days, or judgment. Returned on oath, “Served attachment on
Justice, deft. and garnishee, and served copy of interrogatories and rule
Attachment 35|to answer, on garnishee, personally, on 21st inst.” June 28th,
Entering action . 25
Ret. and oath of const,
Rule. . . .
Interrogatories . 6
Notice to garnishee .
Ret, of rule.
Proof of service of rule (1 oath) 7 2 :
MWe (LO eee a whereupon judgment that the plff. have execution of the said
Answer (1 oath) .
Trial and judgment .
Execution . .
Return. .
Satisfaction
Constable,
Serving att. on garnishee .
Mileage < .
Serving att. on deft. .
Mileage if 7 .
Serving notice of rule
Mileage = .
Serving execution
‘omm’s .
Mileage
1893, plff. appears, and claims to have execution of his judg-
ment on the effects of the deft. in the hands of the garnishee.
Deft. does not appear. Garnishee appears, and files his answer,
admitting that he is indebted to the deft. in the sum of $20,
debt of $20, due by the garnishee to the deft. and attached in
his hands; and if the said garnishee refuse or neglect, on de-
mand by the constable, to pay the same, then the same to be
levied of his, the garnishee’s, goods and chattels, as in case of
a judgment against him for his own proper debt; and that the
garnishee be thereupon discharged, as against the deft. of the
sum so attached and levied. July 2d, 1893, execution issued
against garnishee. S.S., constable. Returned July 5th, 1893,
“Money paid into office.’ Received $15.47 cents, amount of
debt attached, less cost of attachment suit.
(Signed) A.B.
[ 212 ]
Attachment for Contempt,
When and how it should issue.
A Justice oF THE Peace has no power to punish contempts committed before him,
in a summary manner, by imprisonment. That power belongs to the higher courts
alone! But they may, in such cases, hold the offender to bail, to answer “upon
indictment, and to be of good behavior in the meanwhile; and may commit him in
default of bail. An indictment will lie for a contempt of a justice of the peace,
which, though not a breach of the peace, amounts to an obstruction of the execu-
tion of his office? Such party may be bound over or committed, without a previous
charge or oath, on hearing.’ ;
The only case in which a justice can issue an attachment for contempt, is that
of disobedience of his process. If a witness, not having a sufficient excuse, neglect
to attend upon a subpena, he is liable to be proceeded against by attachment for a
contempt of the process of the law. In order to ground this summary mode of
proceeding, it is necessary to prove that the witness was personally served with the
. subpena ; unless by his own act he dispense with the legal form of service.*
An attachment has been refused where the witnéss was very old, weak and
infirm, and it was sworn that he could not attend without danger of his life. And
where it appeared that witnesses against whom an attachment had issued for dis-
obedience to a subpana, had been so much indisposed as to be incapable of attend-
ing, they were discharged, and the costs of the attachment directed to abide the
event of the suit.6 The general rule appears to be, that the party applying for an
attachment, must make out a clear case of contempt. The following is the form
of an attachment to compel the attendance of a witness :
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ss.
: The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To M. G., Constable of the 2d ward of the said city, greeting:
We command you, that you attach M. R., of the said city, tanner, if he be found in
your bailiwick, and him safely keep, so that you have his body before the subscriber, one
of our magistrates in and for the said city, at his office, No. 340 South Fifth Street, on the
10th of October 1880, aforesaid, to answer us of a certain contempt by him done, in
refusing to appear before our said magistrate, at his office, then and there to testify his
knowledge in a certain action depending before ovr said magistrate, wherein W. Y. is
plaintiff and A. D. defendant, as the said M. R. was duly required and summoned so
to do. Have you then there this writ.
Witness our said magistrate, at Philadelphia aforesaid, this the eighth day of October,
in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and eighty.
G. W., Magistrate. [szat.]
When the case shall be again before the justice and the witness in attendance,
he must pay the costs of the attachment and service, unless he can satisfactorily
prove that it was uot in his power to attend at the time he was required. Under
such ciréumstances the costs must abide the issue of the suit. The justice has no
power to punish the contempt of the process by imprisonment; even the superior
courts can punish disobedience to process by fine only.?
If the witness attend, but refuse to be sworn and give evidence, he may, on
application, be committed—* for having refused to testify his knowledge in a case
now pending before our magistrate G@. W., at his office in the city of Philadelphia,
he having refused to be sworn and give evidence in the said case.’ A witness
persevering in silence, when questioned, may be committed for contempt, and con-
12 Penn. St 99 5 1 Dall
2128. &R.175. 2 Bro. 149, iT 8 Pr, 2 650
8 2 Chest. Co. R. 557, 71Gr. 458, Purd. 382
417. & H. Pr. 3649. 1Y, 303, : aren
ATTORNEYS, 213
fined until he does answer.!_ The commitment in such case should be “ until the
witness is willing to testify.’”
A magistrate appointed under a rule of a court of record to take depositions, is
empowered to imprison a witness who contumaciously refuses to be sworn in order
to testify in the cause.* But although the magistrate, in such case, has power to
attach or commit, ¢ seems, the more proper course is, to make a special return of
the matter to the court from which the rule issued, when the witness may he suh-
penaed to appear at the bar of the court, and answer, or be attached 4
Where a witness before an alderman refused to answer a proper question in the
cause, and the alderman committed him until he should fully answer, Rogers, J.,
refused to discharge the witness, on habeas corpus, and remanded him until he
should answer the question propounded §
Attorneys.
I. Attorneys at law. II. Warrants of attorney.
I. ATTORNEYS AT LAW.
An ATTORNEY AT LAW is a person duly admitted in the courts of law, and who
is appointed by another person, usually denominated his client, to prosecute or
defend some suit on his behalf; and he is considered as a public officer, belonging
to the courts of justice in which he may be admitted.®
The constitution of Pennsylvania provides, ‘‘ that in all criminal prosecutions,
the accused hath a right to be heard by himself and his counsel.” Art. IX., § 9.
And by the act of 21st March 1806, it is provided, that “in all civil suits or
proceedings in any court within this commonwealth, every suitor and party con-
cerned, shall have a right to be heard by himself and counsel, or either of them.”
The right of a party to be heard by himself or counsel, was originally conferred by
the provincial act of 1700, which enacted ‘ that in all courts, all persons, of all per-
suasions, may freely appear in their own way and according to their own manner,
and there personally plead their own cause themselves, or, if unable, by their
friends.’’®
The judges of the several courts of record of this commonwealth shall, respect-
ively, have power to admit a competent number of persons, of an honest disposition,
and learned in the law, to practise as attorneys in their respective courts.?
Before any attorney. admitted as aforesaid, shall make any plea at the bar, except
in his own- case, he shall take an oath or affirmation, as follows, viz. :
“ You do swear or affirm, that you will support the constitution of the United
States, and the constitution of this commonwealth, and that you will behave yourself
in the office of attorney, within this court, according to the best of your learning and
ability, and with all good fidelity, as well to the court as to the client ; that you will
use no falsehood, nor delay any person’s cause for lucre or malice.”
No alderman or justice of the peace shall practise as attorney or counsellor in
any court of justice in this commonwealth, in any case which has been or may be
removed from before him by appeal, or by writ of certiorari ; or act as agent in any
such case.
If any attorney at law shall misbehave himself in his office of attorney, he shall
be liable to suspension, removal from office, or to such other penalties as have
‘hitherto been allowed in such cases by the laws of this commonwealth.”
12 Rep. Const. Ct. 167. 2 Clark 344. 1 6 3 Bl. Com. 25.
P
Greenl. Evid. 3 319. 1 Purd. 150.
2 8 Law Rep. 167. 8 Franklin’s Laws, 34.
3 2 Clark 340. 9 Act 14 April 1834 2 68. Purd. 150.
4 Pfiel v. Elmes, 1 T. & H. Pr. 3611. In such 10 Ibid. 2 69. It is in the discretion of the
cage, the court will not grant an attachment with- courts to admit females to practice as attorneys.
out a previous rule to show cause. 15 W.N.C. 14 W. N.C. 466.
127, And see 105 Penn. St. 13. 1 Act 14 April 1834 3 75. Purd. 150.
5 Bright. 109. Ibid. 373. Purd. 151.
214 ATTORNEYS
If any attorney shall retain money belonging to his client, after demand made by
the client for payment thereof, it shall be the duty of the court to cause the name
of such attorney to be stricken from the roll of the attorneys, and to prevent him
from prosecuting longer in such court. Se ete
An attorney’s agreement to refer a cause binds his client ;? and he may agree to
a case stated.® His authority to confess a judgment need not be in writing.* Asa
general rule, he has not power to bind his client by a compromise.’ Payment to
the attorney is payment to the principal.* The court will always look into the deal-
ing between attorney and client, and guard the latter frown imposition.”
An attorney at law may maintain an action on an implied asswmpsit for profes-
sional services rendered by him, without regard to the quality of the services. He
has no lien for his fees on money in the hands of the sheriff;* but he has a lien
tor his professional compensation on the papers in his hands, or on the money
collected by him.” An attorney at law who collects money and refuses to pay it
over to his client, until sued for it, is entitled to no compensation for his professional
services." Whenever an attorney disobeys the lawful instructions of his client, and
a loss ensues, the atturney is responsible fur that loss.12 Members of the bar are
not entitled to witness fees for attendance in a court in which they actually
practise.”
When money is paid to an attorney for services to be rendered at a future day, a
right of action to recover it back arises at the time he neglects or refuses to render
the service.* A payment to an attorney by a sheriff, who has notice that the
attorney’s authority has been revoked, is bad.3
A power of attorney to collect money, the attorney to receive one-half of the net
proceeds, as compensation, is not irrevocable.
II. WARRANTS OF ATTORNEY,
A warrant of attorney is a written authority to the attorney or attorneys to whom
it is directed, to appear for the person executing it, to receive a declaration for him
in an action at the suit of the person therein mentioned, and thereupon to confess
the action, or suffer judgment to pass by default; and to sign a release of all errors
and defects touching such proceedings. A warrant of attorney is generally given
under seal, though it is said this is not indispensable.” A warrant of attorney may
be attested by the attorney to whom it is directed.®
The judgment of a justice of the peace entered by authority of a warrant of
attorney is void ; a transcript thereof filed in the common pleas as a judgment,
upon which executions were issued, lands levied and sold, is also void, and will be
reversed, and restitution of the money made by the sheriff’s sale awarded.8 A
warrant of attorney to confess judgment given by a single woman, is not revoked
by ber subsequent marriage.?
a Act 14 April 1834374, Purd.151. A'’writof 4 W. 420. 7 Penn. St. 376. See 102 Ibid.
error lies to summary proceedings against an 549,
attorney, by act 19 May 1879. Purd. 151. 12 8 Mass. 57.
21 Dall. 164. 13-1 Whart. 276,
3 50 Penn. St. 85. 14 2 Mass. 198. ‘
Ee pl Ibid. 493, 16 3 W. 357.
Foe Thid. 514, 99 Ibid. 147. 100 Ibid. 108. 16 54 Penn. St. 212, 266. See 100 Ibid. 563.
Bee 103 Ibid. 77. 1 1 Bouv. Inst. 351. 5 Taunt. 264. 1 Del. Co.
: ine a ea 1 Tidd’s Pract. 93.
ns, 253. owndes, Maxwell & Pollock 557. s.c 21
: 4 W. 334. 2P. & W. 62. Law J. RB. (N. 8.) Q. B. 16.
3 W. 357. But see 33 Pitts. L. J, 150. 19 6 W. 294.
ss a Penn. St. 99. 38 Ibid. 231. 33 Pitts. L. 20 35 Penn. St, 146.
[{ 215 ]
Auctions,
An Auction is a public sale, where the parties designing to purchase bid upon
each other, that is. successively offering an increasing price; the sale being to the
highest bidder.’ From the circumstance of the bids being repeated aloud by the
salesman or auctioneer, it is sometimes termed a sale “by outcry.”? An auctioneer
differs from a broker in being authorized only to sell, and that at public auction.
The business of an auctioneer is regulated, in this state, by various acts of
assembly, applying to different parts of the commonwealth. By these statutes,
auctioneers are required to take out licenses or commissions, authorizing them to
carry on the business, for which they must pay a price regulated by law, according
to the privileges granted. They give bonds to the commonwealth for the faithful
performance of the several duties enjoined upon them by law; and are sworn to
conform in all things to the auction laws of the state. Duties are laid on certain
goods sold at auction; and penalties inflicted for selling without a commission, or
otherwise violating the laws. They are bound to report quarterly to the state
treasurer, under oath, the amount of their sales, and to pay over to him the amount
of the duties accruing thereon by law.
The act of 9th February 1751 prohibits the giving or selling of any rum, wine
or other strong liquors, at any auction, to the persons attending the same, under a
penalty of five pounds for each offence; one-half for the use of the overseers of the
poor, and the other half for the use of the informer. These penalties are recoverable
before any justice of the peace, who is authorized summarily to convict the offender,
either on his own view, or on the testimony of one or more witnesses; saving to the
defendant the right of appeal. These fines are to be levied by distress and sale
of the defendant’s goods, and for want of such distress, he may be committed to
prison, without bail, for the space of forty days.
The auction laws do not extend to hinder any executor or administrator from
selling at auction, the lands or goods of their respective testators or intestates; nor
to any judicial sales by sheriffs or constables; nor to the sale of goods distrained
for rent.* ee
A sale by auction is not complete until the bid has been accepted. The bid is
only an offer to pay a stipulated price for the article about to be sold; and like every
other offer, which has not been accepted, it may be withdrawn until accepted.
Where a bid had been made at a sheriff’s sale by auction, and the sale adjourned,
the bid was held to be withdrawn by implication. An auctioneer’s authority to
sell may be revoked, even after he has incurred expenses in reference to the goods.?
The general rule of law is, that parol evidence of declarations of an auctioneer is
not admissible to vary the written terms of sale® If a purchaser at auction do not
fulfil his contract, he is liable for the difference between the price which he bid and
a less price for which the goods may be sold at a second sale at auction, with interest
thereon.? Ifa purchase be made at auction of numerous articles of personal pro-
perty, at one and the same time, and from the same vendor, the whole constitutes
one entire contract, though the articles purchased be struck off separately, at
separate and distinct prices. A purchaser at auction “ for cash before removal of
the goods,” is liable in a suit by the vendor, unless he show an offer to pay the
price and remove the goods purchased, or that the plaintiff prevented it.
If goods be sent to auction, with directions to the auctioneer to dispose of them
at a certain average advance on the invoice price, and he sell them for less than
1 1 Burrill’s Law Dict. 162. 1W. & S. 552. any mode by which the bidder announces his wil-
2 Babington on Auctions 2. The word “outcry” lingness to give a particular price. 56 Penn. St.
in our statutes is synonymous with “public ven- 245.
due.” 1W. &S. 553. 6 6 Penn. St. 486.
8 2 H.BI.555, A merchant cannot be licensed 710C. B. 744.
88 an auctioneer, merely to enable him io sell his : i S My ae Je bean Bek,
OT Burd. 155, 158. eee 10 2W. & 8. 377. 2 Penn. St. 74. 1W.N. C. 38.
5 1 Bouv. Inst. 392, A bid may be made in 1 Ibid.
216 BAIL.
the limited price, an action may be maintained against him for the difference
between the limited price and that for which the goods were sod*
‘A reservation in the condition of sale, to the owners, of an open bid, is proper.
But if the owner of an estate put up to sale by auction employ puffers to bid for
him, it is a fraud on the real bidders, and the highest bidder cannot be compelled
to complete the contract.2 The employment of a bidder merely to raise the price at
a sale of real estate, under an order of the orphans’ court, is a fraud upon the pur-
chaser! An agreement entered into for the purpose of preventing competition at a
sale of property, under execution or distress for rent, is void as against public poliey.®
An auctioneer’s bond, under the act of assembly, is a security for his private cus-
tomers, as well as for the duties payable to the state® And the person who first
brings suit is entitled to priority of payment."
A licensed auctioneer, in the city of Philadelphia, who advances money on goods,
and charges commissions on such advances, is liable to the payment of a pawnbroker’s
license, under the city ordinance.®
ail.
I. Bail defined and explained. IV. Bail for stay of execution or appeal.
II. Bail in civil cases. V. Form of scire facias against bail.
III. Form of a bail-piece.
I. Baru is used in our common law, for the freeing or setting at liberty of one
arrested or imprisoned upon action, either civil or criminal, on surety taken for his
appearance, at a day and place certain.®
The reason why it is called bal is because, by this means, the party restrained is
delivered into the hands of those that bind themselves for his forthcoming, in order
to a safe-keeping or protection from prison; and the end of bail is to satisfy the
condemnation and costs, or render the defendant to prison.”
II. Bat IN CIVIL CASES.
Since the passage of the act of 12th July 1842," to abolish imprisonment for debt,
a recognisance of special bail in its technical sense—bail for the body—can only be
taken, by a justice, for the appearance of a defendant arrested on a capias, in a case
not within the provisions of that act, viz., in trespass or trover, for the recovery of
money collected by a public officer, or for official misconduct.
One who is special bail may depute another to execute a bail-piece for him, or
one of two special bail may depute the other to execute it.” Bail may take up their
principal, when attending court as a suitor, or at any other time. Special bail
may arrest their principal anywhere, at any time, and under any circumstances."
ap in a suit entered in another state may seize and take the principal in this
state.
Bail may depute another to take and surrender their principal; and the bail, or the
person deputed by him for that purpose, may take the principal in another state, or
at apy time and in any place; and may, after demand of admittance, and refusal,
break open the door of the principal’s house, in order to take him. But if they use
more force than is necessary, they will (as in other cases) become trespassers ab inttio
{from the beginning], and be liable for false imprisonment.”
If the creditor has the means of satisfaction in his hands, and chooses not to
retain it, but suffers it to pass into the hands of the principal, the surety is dis-
1118. & R. 86, 10 i
132 Sm. 9. u Para, oo
® Solw. N. P. 191. 1 Bro, 346. 23 W. Va. 338. 126 W. 402.
14 Penn. St. 446. 16 zbid. 200. 328m.9 134 ¥. 123,
53.N.¥.129. 1 Bouv, Inst. 236. 14 Thid.
63 Y.335. 4 Dall. 95. 3 W. 297, 182 Y, 263,
3 Dall. 500. 1 Binn. 370, 16 7 Johns, 140,
8 35 Penn. 277.
1
® Bract, lib, 3, tit, 2, ¢. 8. Spares
BAIL. 217
charged! When the surety apprises the creditor of the means of obtaining
satisfaction, without resorting to his personal liability, and the creditor refuses or
neglects to use these means, the surety is discharged” It seems, that a surety who
has property of his principal in bis hands, may give it up to satisfy an execution
against himself for the debt for which he was surety.®
A temporary stay of execution, by agreement of the plaintiff, in covsideration
of a confession of judgment by the defendant, will not exonerate the special bail in
the action.‘
Where money is paid by a surety for two principals, the law implies a promise
by each principal to reimburse the surety for the whole amount paid.
Special bail has a right to appeal from the judgment of a justice against them,
notwithstanding the act of 1810 says that, on the judgment of the justice, execu-
tion shall issue without stay.*
A surrender of the principal, in an insolvent bond, before the day of appearance.
will not discharge the bail from his obligation.’ The bail of an insolvent is entitlea
to every part of the condition of the bond prescribed by the act of assembly ; ana
if it do not contain the alternative of a procurement of a discharge or a surrender
to jail, no recovery can be had upon it.8
Bail may recover such sums as they have been necessarily and fairly obliged to
expend—as in sending after and securing their principal after he has absconded,
in order to surrender him.?
III. Form oF A BAIL-PIECE.
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ss.
A. B.) Before [E. F., Magistrate.] Acrion or Trespass.
vs. > Judgment for plaintiff, for [twenty-six dollars and twenty-nine cents] damages,
Cc. D and eighty-seven cents costs.
I do certify, that [G. H.], of [No. 20 Arch street], became special bail for the defend-
ant, in the above action, in the sum of a dollars, for the appearance of the said
defendant at my office, on the [seventh] day of [August] 1880, by recognisance taken
before me, one of the magistrates in and for the said city, the [second] day of [August]
1880, as appears by the record of the said recognisance remaining in my office. Witness
the said magistrate [or justice of the peace], who has hereunto set his hand and seal, the
[twentieth] day of [August], in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and
eighty. E. F., Magistrate. [szat.]
The justice must recollect that so long as the provisions of the act of 12th July
1842, are in force, he cannot issue a bail-piece to arrest the principal, in any case
within the provisions of that act.
IV. Bar FOR STAY OF EXECUTION OR APPEAL.
The act of 20th March 1845” provides, that the bail in all cases where bail is
required for stay of execution, shall be bail absolute, with one or more sufficient
sureties, in double the amount of the debt or damages, interest and costs recovered,
conditioned for the payment thereof, in the event that the defendant fail to pay the
same at the expiration of the stay of execution.
The same act provides, that the bail, in cases of appeal from the judgments of
aldermen and justices of the peace, shall be bail absolute, in double the probable
amount of costs accrued and likely to accrue, with one or more sufficient sureties,
conditioned for the payment of all costs accrued, or that may be legally recovered
against the appellant. In order to obtain an appeal or stay of execution, women, as
well as men, must give the security required by law.
See AcTIONS AT LAW, V. and VII. 1.
185. & R. 452. ™4 W. 69
413 Ibid. 157 : : i leagerg
3 sp.
‘ 3 W. 376. 10 Purd. 830
§ 3 Binn. 126 11 1 Clark 501.
63S. aR. 93.
218 BAIL AND COMMITMENT.
V. Form oF SCIRE FACIAS AGAINST BAIL.
BUCKS COUNTY, ss.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To the Constable of township, or to the next constable of the said county most
convenient to the defendant, greeting :
Wuerzas, ——, on the —— day of ——, A.
p. 1880, obtained judgment before J. R.
one of the justices of the peace of the said county, against ——, for the sum ——
debt, and —— costs. And whereas , on the —— day of — 1880, entered into a
recounisance before the said justice, in the sum of ——, conditioned that the said ——
should, at the expiration of —— months from the said - day of —— 1880, pay the
amount of the said judgment, debt, interest and costs, or if he should fail to pay the same,
that he the said —— would pay the same for him. And whereas, the said hath not
paid the said —— the debt, interest and costs aforesaid, nor hath the said paid the
same, as we have been informed, although the said term of —— months has expired.
Now, therefore, we command you, that you make known to the said —— that he be and
appear before our said justice, at his office at ——, on the —— day of —— 1881, between
the hours of nine and ten in the forenoon, to show cause, if anything he knows, or hath
to say why the said sum of —— due and in form aforesaid acknowledged, should not be
made of the proper goods and chattels of him the said to the use of the said ——,
according to the form and effect of the said recognisance, if to him it shall seem expedient.
And hereof fail not. Witness our said justice, at . who hath hereunto set his hand
and seal this —— day of ——, a. p. 1881. J.R., Justice. [sear]
If the surety can be served with process, a scire facias is unnecessary, as an
action of debt will lie upon the recognisance, to be commenced by the ordinary writ
of summons. If the bail reside in another county, a transcript of the judgment
should be transmitted to a justice or alderman of that county, who may issue pro-
cess against the bail.’
Bail and Commitment in Criminal Cases.
I. For what crimes bail may be taken, and by V. Form, &c., to appear and keep the peace.
VI. Recognisance to give evidence.
VII. VIII. [X. Forms to return to court in cases
of assault and battery, to keep the peace
and give evidence.
X. Docket-entry of recognisance.
whom.
II. Where and how the prisoner may be com~-
mitted.
III. A general form of commitment.
IV. Form of a recognisance to appear at court.
J. FoR WHAT ORIMES BAIL MAY BE TAKEN, AND BY WHOM.
EXcEssIvE bail shall not be required.? All prisoners shall be bailable by
sufficient sureties, unless for capital offences, when the proof is evident or pre-
sumption great.’
In all cases, the party accused, on oath or affirmation, of any crime or misde-
meanor aga‘nst the laws, shall be admitted to bail by one or more sufficient sureties,
to be taken before any judge, justice, mayor, recorder or alderman where the offence
charged has been committed, except such persons as are precluded from being bailed
by the constitution of this commonwealth: Provided also, 'That persons accused as
aforesaid, of murder or manslaughter, shall only be admitted to bail by the supreme
court or one of the judges thereof, or a president or associate law judge of a court
of common pleas: persons accused, as aforesaid, of arson, rape, mayhem, sodowy,
buggery, robbery or burglary, shall only be bailable by the supreme court, the court
of common pleas, or any of the judges thereof, or a mayor or recorder of a city.
All sureties, mainpernors and bail in criminal cases, whether bound in recogni-
I 3 Clark 431. In this case, Judge King says
a justice is not authorized to proceed upon two
returns of nihél to successive writs of scire facias
against bail residing in another county; but
suppose the surety has removed to another state,
leaving property within the jurisdiction, what is
the plaintifi’s remedy, if he cannot proceed by
ecire facias and alias; or is he wholly remediless,
He could go into the state of the surety’s residence,
and obtain judgment there, but an execution
issued on such judgment would not reach the pro-
perty here. Possibly, he could proceed against
the surety as a non-resident debtor, under the act
of 1874. Purd. 991.
2 Const. U. S. Amend. art. VIII. Const. Penn.
art. I. 2 13.
8 Const. Penn. art. 1. 314. See 2 Pitts. 362,
4 Act 31 March 1860 37. Purd. 546.
BAIL AND COMMITMENT. 219
sances for a particular matter or for all charges whatsoever, shall be entitled to
have a bail-piece, duly certified by the proper officer or person before whom or in
whose office the recognisance of such surety, mainpernors or bail shall be or remain,
and upon such bail-piece, by themselves or their agents, to arrest and detain, and
surrender their principals, with the like effect as in cases of bail in civil actions ;
and such bail-piece shall be a sufficient warrant or authority for the proper sheriff
or jailer to receive the said principal, and have him forthcoming to answer the
matter or matters alleged against him: Provided, That nothing herein contained
shall prevent the person thus arrested and detained from giving new bail or sure-
ties for his appearance, who shall have the same right of surrender hereinbefore
provided.
When any one is arrested on a warrant or bail-piece in any criminal cage in which
a justice of the peace would, by existing laws, be allowed to take recognisance of
bail for his appearance to answer the offence or crime complained of, the officer or
person making the arrest may take the accused before a justice and have him
released on the requisite security being given ; and his return, when properly made,
shall exonerate him from further liability.
To refuse or delay to bail any person bailable is an offence against the liberty of
the subject, in any magistrate, by the common law.*
If the offence be not bailable, or the party cannot find bail, he is to be committed
to the county jail by the mittimus of the justice, or warrant under his hand and
seal, containing the cause of his committment—there to abide till delivered by due
course of law.*
A justice of the peace may discharge from prison one committed by him for a
bailable offence, whether felony or misdemeanor, taking a recognisance for his
appearance at court to answer.?
II. WHERE AND HOW THE PRISONER MAY BE COMMITTED.
If a man commit felony in one county, and be arrested for the same in another
county, he shall be committed to jail in that county where he is taken. Yet, if he
escape and be taken on a fresh suit in another county, he may be carried back to
the county where he was first taken.6 But a warrant issued by a justice in one
county, and indorsed by a justice of another, charging a misdemeanor to have been
committed in the county whence the warrant issued, will not justify the detention
of the offender in the jail of the county where the warrant was endorsed."
The mention of the name, and the authority of the justice (Lord Hale says),
in the beginning of the mittimus, is not always necessary, for the seal and subscrip-
tion of the justice to the mittimus is sufficient warrant to the jailer; for it may be
supplied by averment that it was done by the justice®
The mitt’mus should contain the name and surname of the party committed, if
known; if not known, then it may be sufficient to describe the person by his age,
stature, complexion, color of his hair, and the like, and to add that he refuseth to
tell his name? It ought to contain the cause, as for treason or felony or suspicion
thereof; otherwise, if it contain no cause at all, and the prisoner escape, it is no
offence at all; whereas, if the mittimus contained the cause, the escape were treason
or felony, though he were not guilty of the offence, and, therefore, for the king’s
[commonwealth’s] benefit, and that the prisoner may be the more safely kept, the
mittimus ought to contain the cause.” A warrant or mitt¢mus, to answer to such
things as shall be objected against him, is utterly against law." .
Also, it ought to contain the certainty of the cause; and, therefore, if it be for
felony, it ought not to be generally for felony, but it must contatn the special nature
of the felony, briefly, as for felony for the death of such an one, or for burglary, in
1 Act 31 March 1860 2 8. Purd. 547. W.&8. 314. 2 Pars, 458.
2 Act 24 Feb. 1870. Purd. 546. The title of
this act, refers only to Crawford county, but the
enactment is general. But the title of an act is
now deemed a part of it. 66 Penn. St. 164, 70
Thid. 311. And see 94 Ibid. 450. 1
8 4 Bl. Com. 242. ul
* Thid. 244.
1 Gr. 218.
2 Hale H. P. C. 122.
1 Ibid. 577. 1 Chit. Cr. L. 27.
2 Inst.52. 4 Mass. 497. 2 Ash. 61.
2 Tust. 591.
220 BAIL AND COMMITMENT.
breaking the house of such an one; and the reason is, because it may appear to
the judge upon a habeas corpus, whether it be felony or not.’
The mittimus must be under seal; and without this the commitment is unlawful ;
the jailer is liable to false imprisonment; and the wilful escape of the jailer, or
breach of prison by the felon, makes no felony.’ It should also set forth the place
at which it is made (that it may appear to be within the jurisdiction of the justice).
It must also have a certain date of the year and day.’
The act of 30th March 1821 directs, that it shall be the duty of every justice of
the peace of the county or alderman of the city of Philadelphia, before whom any
recognisance of bail or surety in any criminal or supposed criminal case shall be
taken, to set down accurately and at large, in a docket or record to be kept for that
purpose, the name, place of abode, particularly describing the same, and the occu-
pation or business of such recognisance or surety; and if the said recognisor or
surety shall not be a housekeeper, the name and place of abode, particularly
describing the same, and the occupation or.business of the person or persons with
whom such recognisor or surety may reside; and the said justices of the peace of
said county, or aldermen of the said city, are required and enjoined to make a full
and complete return of said recognisance or surety to the proper court having
cognisance of the case, and of all and every the sureties [entries, gu ?] so made on
his docket or record, touching or relating to such recognisance ; together with the
proceedings of such justice of the peace or alderman, relating to the case in which
such person or persons may have become bound as a recognisor or surety as afore-
said.
A recognisance is a bond of record, testifying the recognisor to owe a certain
sum of money to some other, and the acknowledging of the same is to remain of
record, and none can take it but only a judge or officer of record. But whensoever
any statute giveth them power to take a bond of any man, or to bind over any man
to appear at the assizes or sessions, or to take sureties for any matter or cause, they
may take a recognisance. Yea, wheresoever they have authority given them tc
cause aman to do a thing, there it seemeth they have power given them to bind
the party by recognisance to do it; and if the party shall refuse to be bound,
the justice may send him to jail.6 He can only require security till the next
court.” pa ‘ Pe Shi ps 6 Be me, Se
Every obligatiog’/and recognisance taken by justices of the peace must be made
to the commonwealth. It must also contain the name, place of abode, and trade
or calling, both of principals and sureties, and the sum in which they are bound.
And it is most commonly subject to a condition, which is either endorsed or under-
written, or contained within the body of it, upon the performance of which the
recognisance shall be void. Feme coverts (married women) and infants ought to
find security, and not be bound themselves.
Where a justice or alderman has authority to inquire into an offence and com-
mit the prisoner ; hold him to bail or discharge him, as circumstances may require,
he may take a recognisance for his appearance before him, from time to time,
pending the examinations.® A justice may take recognisance with sureties for the
appearance of a party charged with a bailable offence, at an adjourned examination,
and if he do not appear, he and his sureties may be called, and a proper entry of
their default made?
On a verdict of acquittal, the defendant’s recognisance is considered ipso facto
[by the fact itself] void, and his bail discharged without ary further entry.2°
A recognisance for a prisoner’s appearance at the next term, and not at the suc-
ceeding Sessions, is to be discharged at the end of the term, by committing or
discharging him, or delivering him on new bail."
1 2 Hale H. P.C. 122. 1 Phila. 80.
7 p
vee : 8 Mass. 78. 1 Ibid. 488. 2 Pars. 458,
8 2 Hawk. P. 0.179, 23 tO. aD
4 Purd. 912, 0 4Cow. 410. B
acer Ww. - But see 4 N.Y. 82.
: alt. ¢. Ww2P. & W. 240,
Ibid. o. 168,
BAIL AND COMMITMENT. 221
III. Form oF COMMITMENT, GENERAL.
CAMBRIA COUNTY, ss.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To the Constable of the township of D——, in the county of Cambri d to th
keeper of the common jail of the sald county, greeting : e i a
Tuersz are to command you, the said constable, forthwith to convey and deliver into
the custody of the keeper of the said common jail, the body of A. B., charged before
J. R., one of our justices of the peace in and for the said county, with [here specify the
offence}. And you, the said keeper, are hereby required to receive the said A. B. into
your custody in the said common jail, and him there safely keep until, &c. [as the case
may be]. Witness the said J. R., at D—— township aforesaid, the fifth day of May, in
the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and eighty.
J. R., Justice of the Peace. [SEAL.|
IV. Form oF A RECOGNISANCE TO APPEAR AT COURT.
You, J. L. [the principal], do acknowledge to owe to the Commonwealth the sum of
one hundred dollars, and you, T. P. and I. 'T'. [the bail], do acknowledge to owe to the
Commonwealth the sum of one hundred dollars each, to be levied of your several and
respective goods and chattels, lands and tenements, to the use of the Commonwealth ;
upon this condition, that if the said J. L. shall appear, personally, at the next court of
quarter sessions of the peace, to be held at R——, for the county of Berks, then and
there to answer such matters and things as shall be objected to him, on behalf of the
Commonwealth, for an assault and battery on S. B., and not to depart said court without
leave, then this recognisance to be void, otherwise to be in full force and virtue. Are
you content?
V. FoRM OF RECOGNISANCE TO APPEAR, &e., AND KEEP THE PEACE AND BE OF
GOOD BEHAVIOR.
You, J. L. [the principal], do acknowledge to owe to the Commonwealth the sum of
one hundred dollars, and you T. P. and T. T. [the bail], do acknowledge to owe to the
Commonwealth the sum of one hundred dollars each, to be levied of your several and
respective goods and chattels, lands and tenements, to the use of the Commonwealth ;
upon this condition, that if the said J. L. shall, personally, appear at the next court of
quarter sessions of the peace, to be held at R——, for the county of Berks, then and
there to answer such matters as shall be objected against him on behalf of the Common-
wealth, and shall, in the mean time, keep the peace, and be of good behavior, towards all
the citizens of the Commonwealth, and especially towards S. B., and not depart said
court without leave, then this recognisance to be void, otherwise to be in full force and
virtue. Are you content?
VI. FoRM OF A RECOGNISANCE TO GIVE EVIDENCE.
You, J. L.,do acknowledge to owe the Commonwealth the sum of jifty dollars, to be
levied of your goods and chattels, lands and tenements, to the use of the Commonwealth;
upon this condition, that if you shall, personally, appear at the next court of quarter
sessions of the peace, to be held at R——, for the county of Berks, then and there to
testify, on behalf of the Commonwealth, against a certain B. W., and not depart the court
without leave, then this recognisance to be void, otherwise to be, and remain, in full force
and virtue. Are you content?
When a recognisauce is taken before a magistrate, he may set it down on his
docket thus—‘“ J. L., bound in $100 to appear, &., T. P. and T. T. bound in $50
each, to give evidence, &c.,” from which he may afterwards make the recognisance
out at length, and certify to the next sessions, or (if the offences be not cognisable
there) to the court of oyer and terminer.
VII. ForMs of RECOGNISANCES TO BE SENT TO THE COURT.
Assault and battery, on oath of 8. B.
Commonwealth | 5 1,, of S—— township, yeoman, held in $100.
Li R. S., of S—— township, yeoman, held in $100.
Der A. T., of L——, carpenter, held in $100.
Upon condition, that if the said J. L. shall, personally, appear at the next court of
uarter sessions of the peace, to be held at R——, for the county of Berks, then and
there to answer such things as shall be objected against him on behalf of the Common-
,; wealth, and not depart the said court without leave, and in the mean time keep the peace,
222 BAIL AND COMMITMENT.
d be of good behavior towards all the citizens of the Commonwealth, and especially,
fear then the above recognisance to be void, otherwise the said several sums of
money to be levied of their goods and chattels, lands and tenements, respectively, to the
use of the Commonwealth. , :
Taken and acknowledged, the third day of May, a. p. one thousand eight hundred and
eighty. Before J. R., Justice of the Peace. [szaz.|
VIII. For THE PEACE AND GOOD BEHAVIOR.
Surety of the peace and good behavior, on the affirmation of S B.
Commonwealth | 7. Taf S— township, yeoman, held in $100.
a R. S., of same township, yeoman, held in $100.
J. L. ’ +g
A. T., of H——, carpenter, held in $100.
Upon condition, that if the said J. L. shall personally appear at the next court of
quarter sessions of the peace, to be held at C——, for the county of Delaware, then and
there to answer such things as shall be objected against him, on behalf of the Common-
wealth, and not depart the said court without leave, and, in the mean time, keep the
peace, and be of good behavior towards all the citizens of the Commonwealth, and espe-
cially towards S, B., then the above recognisance to be void, otherwise, the said several
sums of money to be levied of their goods and chattels, lands and tenements, respectively,
to the use of the Commonwealth.
Taken and acknowledged, the third day of May, a. p. one thousand eight hundred and
eighty. Before J. R., Justice of the Peace. [szat.]
IX. To GIVE EVIDENCE.
Commonwealth Fornication, on oath of C. W.
IL D. S., of M——, weaver, held in $50.
Upon condition, that if the said C. W. shall personally appear at the next court of
quarter sessions of the peace, to be held at R——, for the county of Berks, then and
there to testify, on behalf of the Commonwealth, against a certain J. L., for committing
fornication with a certain C. W., and not depart the said court without leave, then, the
above recognisance to be void, otherwise, the said sum of money to be levied of his goods
and chattels, lands and tenements, to the use of the Commonwealth.
Taken and acknowledged, the third day of May, a. p. one thousand eight hundred and
eighty. Before J. R., Justice of the Peace. [szat.]
X. Dockrt ENTRY OF RECOGNISANCE,
Assault and Battery, on oath of S. B.
ae J. L., of S—— township, yeoman, held in $100.
7 R. 8., of S—— township, yeoman, held in $100,
ae A. T., of H——, carpenter, held in $100.
For the appearance of the defendant, &c., to answer, &c.
& Weta eo, i To give evidence, &e.
May 9th, a. pv. 1880. Before J. R., Justice of the Peace. [SEAL.]
Commonwealth
The parties need not sign the recognisance. If the justice shall subscribe his
name, without his seal to it, this is enough, and that may be in either of these forms:
—Acknowledged before me, J. R., or only to subscribe his name, thus, J. R. The
recognisance is a matter of record, presently, as soon as it is taken and acknow.
ledged, although it be not made up.
11 Obit. Or. L. 4,
[ 223 ]
Gailinent.
I. Bailment defined. III. Judicial opini _
II. Acts of assembly. Pe
I. BaitMEnt is a delivery of goods on a condition expressed or implied, that
they shall be restored by the bailee to the bailor, or according to his directions, aa
soon as the purpose for which they were bailed shall be answered.
II. Act or 24 SepremBer 1866. Purd. 165.
Secr. 1. Warehouse receipts given for any goods, wares, merchandise, grain,
flour, produce, petroleum or other commodity, stored or deposited with any ware-
houseman, wharfinger or other person in this state, or bills of lading, or receipts
for the same, when in transit by cars or vessels to any such warehouseman, wharf-
inger or other person, shall be negotiable, and may be transferred by indorsement
and delivery of said receipt or bill of lading; and any person to whom the said
receipt or bill of lading may be so transferred, shall be deemed and taken to be the
owner of the goods, wares and merchandise therein specified, so as to give security
and validity to any lien created on the same, subject to the payment of freight and
charges thereon ; and no property on which such lien may have been created, shall
be delivered by said warehouseman, wharfinger or other person, except on the sur-
render and the cancellation of said original receipt or bill of lading; or, in case of
partial sale or release of the said merchandise by the written assent of the holder
of said receipt or bill of lading, indorsed thereon: Provided, That all warehouse
receipts or bills of lading, which shall have the words, “not negotiable,” plainly
written or stamped on the face thereof, shall be exempt from the provisions of this
act.
Secr. 2. No warehouseman, wharfinger or other person, shall issue any receipt
or voucher for any goods, wares, merchandise, petroleum, grain, flour or other pro-
duce or commodity, to any person or persons, purporting to be the owner or owners
thereof, unless such goods, wares, merchandise, petroleum, grain, flour or other
produce or commodity, shall have been actually received into store, or upon the
premises of such warehouseman, wharfinger or other person, and shall be in store,
or on the premises aforesaid, and under his control, at the time of issuing such
receipt.
Srcr. 3. No warehouseman, wharfinger or other person, shall issue any second
or duplicate receipt for any goods, wares, merchandise, petroleum, grain, flour or
other produce or commodity, while any former receipt for any such goods, wares,
merchandise, petroleum, grain, flour or other produce or commodity as aforesaid, or
any part thereof, shall be outstanding and uncalled, without writing across the face
of the same “duplicate.”
Scr. 4. No warehouseman, whartinger or other person shall sell or incumber,
ship, transfer, or in any manner remove beyond his immediate control, any goods,
wares, merchandise, petroleum, grain, flour or other produce or commodity, for
which a receipt shall have been given by him as aforesaid, whether received
for storage, shipping, grinding, manufacturing or other purposes, without the re-
turn of such receipt. ;
Szcr. 5. Any warehouseman, wharfinger or other person who shall violate any
of the foregoing provisions of this act, shall be deemed guilty of fraud ; and upon
indictment and conviction, shall be fined in any sum not exceeding one thousand
dollars or imprisoned in one of the state prisons of this state, not exceeding five
years, or both ; and all and every person or persons aggrieved by the violation of
any of the provisions of this act, may have and maintain an action at law, against
the person or persons violating any of the foregoing provisions of this act, to recover
all damages which he or they may have sustained by reason of any such violation
1 Jones Bailm. 2. Story Bailm. 32. 1 Bouv. Inst. 393.
224 BAILMENT.
as aforesaid, before any court of competent jurisdiction, whether such person shall
have been convicted of fraud as aforesaid, under this act, or not. ;
Sxor. 7. The provisions of the foregoing act shall apply to grain stored in grain
elevators, and to petroleum in barrels, stored or kept in places designated by law ;
and the owners or lessees of any of said elevators or places designated as aforesaid,
shall have the right and powers, and be subject to the obligations and penalties as
therein provided, in regard to warehousemen, wharfingers or other persons.
Act or 13 Junz 1874. Purd. 166.
Sxor. 1. Whenever any goods, wares or merchandise shall have been, or shall
hereafter be attached, by writ of foreign or other attachment, in the hands, posses-
sion or custody of any warehouseman, wharfinger or other person, who shall have
issued for the same, any warehouse-receipt or voucher, or any bill of lading or
other receipt, when in transit by car or vessel, which warehouse-receipt, voucher,
bill of lading or other receipt, shall have been negotiated and transferred by
indorsement or delivery, as provided in the act to which this is a supplement,
the holder of any such warehouse-receipt, voucher, bill of lading or other receipt,
to whom the same shall have been transferred or delivered as aforesaid, although
not named or summoned in, or served with such writ of attachment, shall never-
theless be deemed and taken to all intents to be a garnishee of the said goods,
wares or merchandise attached in the said writ, as if the same were in his hands
or possession; and the name of the holder of such warehouse-receipt, voucher,
bill of lading or other receipt shall, upon application to the court wherefrom
such writ has issued, be added to the record of the action as a garnishee of the
said goods, wares or merchandise; and thereupon the said court shall, upon
the motion of the said garnishee, grant arule upon the plaintiff in such attach-
ment, to appear before the court, at the time and place in such rule named, and
there show cause why the attachment of such goods, wares or merchandise should
not be dissolved, or the proceeds thereof, if the same shall have been sold by the
order of the said court, paid to the holder of such warehouse-receipt, voucher,
bill of lading or other receipt, upon his giving security as such garnishee, by
recognisance and sufficient sureties to be approved by the court, or by one of the
judges thereof in vacation, with condition that so much of the said goods, wares
or merchandise, or of the proceeds thereof, after the sale of the whole or any part
thereof, as shall remain after the settlement or payment thereout, of the amount
of any lien upon the said goods, wares or merchandise created by the advance of
money or credit by the said holder of such warehouse-receipt, voucher, bill of lading
or other receipt, transferred or delivered as aforesaid, and also of all prior liens for
storage, freight and other charges, shall be retained in the hands of the said gar-
nishee, to answer, if the plaintiff shall have execution of any judgment of the
effects of the defendant in the action attached as aforesaid, or to abide the further
order of the said court.
Sror. 2. Where goods, wares or merchandise shall be taken from the possession
of any warehouseman, wharfinger, carrier or other bailee, by writ of attachment,
replevin or other legal process, such warehouseman, wharfinger, carrier or other
bailee shall not be liable therefor to the owner of such goods, wares or merchandise,
or to the holder of any receipt, voucher or bill of lading given for the same; saving
and reserving, however, to such owner or holder, all legal remedies for the recovery
of the said goods, wares or merchandise from any person unlawfully detaining
the eame, OF for the recovery of damages against any person unlawfully taking the
same,
Act oF 8 June 1881. Purd. 166.
Szor. 1. Any carrier or other bailee of property, who has parted with its pos"
session by mistake, to any person not entitled to the possession, may, after demand,’
maintain an action of replevin for the same, or if the property can not be found, an
action of asswmpsit, or trover and conversion, against the party converting or
removing it. In the case of replevin, if there was no fraud in obtaining such pos-
session, the plaintiff shall first tender to the defendant the freight or other proper
charges which have acerued, at the time of the demand of possession,
1 See 40 Penn. St. 448.
BAILMENT. 295
ILI. Though the act of 1866 makes bills of lading, &c., negotiable by indorse-
ment and delivery, it does not confer on them all the qualities of commercial paper ;
the purchaser of a lost or stolen bill of lading acquires no title to the property!
Under that act, a warehouse-receipt must be issued by the person in possession
of the goods, in his own right; a mere servant or agent cannot issue such receipt?
One who receives grain for his own use, as an immediate purchaser, or for future
sale on account of the depositor, and not for the purpose of holding it in specie, for
a compensation, until called for by the bailor, or his transferree, is not a warehouse-
man within the meaning of the act.?
The hiring or leasing of personal property, with an agreement that the title shall
pass, when money is paid, is a bailment, and no title is acquired by one who receives
it from the bailee, with notice of the facts. But whenever it appears from the
contract between the parties, that the owner of personal property has transferred
the possession thereof to another, reserving to himself the naked title, solely for the
purpose of securing payment of the price agreed upon between them, the contract
is necessarily a conditional sale, and not a bailment; and while it is perfectly good
as between the parties themselves, it is worthless as to creditors and to bond fide
purchasers from the transferree, without notice.®
A bailee without reward is only responsible for gross negligence ;° but the care
and diligence required is proportioned to the subject-matter of the contract." The
burden of proving gross negligence rests on the depositor.’ The bailee is not liable
for a loss by robbery, in the absence of evidence of such negligence ;° nor for a loss
resulting from the act of God; nor where the property is taken from his posses-
sion by the hand of the law, without fault, negligence or act on his part."
Any damage happening to a chattel while in the hands of a bailee, without his
misconduct, and while the chattel is employed in the use for which it was hired,
must be sustained by the bailor.” So, one who hires a carriage and horses for
a journey, is not liable to an injury to the horses from immoderate driving, if the
owner send his own driver and the bailee do no act which occasions the injury."
But if a bailee return the property in a damaged state, without explanation, the
burden of proving the absence of negligence is upon him.“ If injury happen to
property in the hands of a bailee, the interference of the bailor to remedy the evil,
will not release the bailee from liability for the consequences of his negligence.’®
A bailee to whom logs are delivered to be converted into boards, has a lien on
them for his labor, independent of any special agreement, and he may maintain an
action against an execution-creditor of the bailor, by whom they are taken out of
his possession."* But a finder of lost property has no lien for expenses gratuitously
incurred in taking care of it.” Since the passage of the act of 14th December 1863,"
a bailee may transfer the property, subject to his lien, and the purchaser will stand
in his shoes; the rule of the common law is thereby abrogated.”
An ordinary bailee for hire, in case of the non-delivery of goods intrusted to
him, is liable therefor, in the absence of proof of ordinary diligence; the fact
of non-delivery is prima facie evidence of want of ordinary care, and casts the
burden of proof on the defendant.”
The act of 25 May 1893 (Purd. 166), provides for petition to the common pleas,
where a receipt has been lost or destroyed.
1101 TU. S. 557. 10 91 Penn. St. 310.
292 Penn. St. 518. 9 W.N. C. 54. 11 40 Ibid. 446.
8 41 Leg. Int. 288. 12 11 Johns. 21%. 1 Bouv. Inat. 405.
4 51 Penn. St. 26. 19 Ibid. 488. 105 Ibid. 103. 13 9 W. 556.
5 16 W.N. 0.275. And see 64 Penn. St. 499. 14 6 Penn. St. 417.
92 Ibid. 53. 95 Ibid. 508. 105 Ibid. 103. 33 % 7 W. 542. :
Am. L. Reg. 506. 16 33 Penn. St. 151. 86 Ibid. 486.
6148. &R. 275. 15 Penn. St. 172. lt 4 W. 63. 16 Penn. St. 393.
779 Ibid. 106. 85 Ibs. 91. Ibid. 391. 100 16 Purd. 1059.
U.S. 699. 19 58 Penn. St. 414.
8 89 Penn. St. 308. 94 Ibid. 409. 10 W.335. % 32 Ibid. 208.
® 81 Penn. St. 95.
15
[ 226 J
Bankruptey.
A Banxrupr is defined to be a broken and ruined trader; one whose table or.
counter of business is broken up, bancus ruptus.' Or, in other words, “a person
who has done or suffered some act to he done, which is by law declared an act of
bankruptcy.’ It is generally considered synonymous with the term “ insolvent ;””
but this is not strictly correct, for a man may be insolvent, without being a
bankrupt ; and a man may become a bankrupt, though abundantly able to pay his
debts.
The constitution vests in congress the power to pass uniform laws on the subject
of bankruptcies throughout the United States. , But a state has authority to pass a
bankrupt law, provided such law do not impair the obligation of contracts, and
provided there be no act of congress in force to establish a uniform system of bank-
ruptey, conflicting with such law.* A state bankrupt law is constitutional as to
debts subsequently contracted between citizens of such state ;3> but a discharge
under such law does not bar the rights of citizens of other states,® unless they come
in and make themselves parties, by receiving a dividend.’
The effect of a discharge in bankruptcy is to extinguish a pre-existing debt, and
not merely to bar the remedy thereon ;° but a promise, after the discharge, to pay a
prior debt, is binding on the bankrupt.? A mere acknowledgment, however, though
clear, distinct and unambiguous in its terms, is not sufficient to restore a debt
which has been discharged under the operation of the bankrupt laws; nothing
remains after the discharge but the moral obligation to pay, which, taken with the
fact of the prior legal obligation, has been held to form a sufficient consideration
for a new express promise ; in the nature of the case, however, there cannot arise
a promise by implication, as the mere acknowledgment of a debt would not create
any liability, if, in fact, no debt existed. The promise to restore a debt from which
the debtor has been discharged, whether by proceedings in bankruptcy or other-
wise, must be a clear, distinct and unequivocal promise to pay the specific debt, not
the expression of a mere intention to pay; it must be without qualification or
condition, and must contain all the essentials of a valid express agreement, except-
ing only the element of a valid consideration.!
The English rule that an assignee in bankruptcy is vested with the personal pro-
perty of the bankrupt, in a foreign country, and which recognises the title of a
foreign assignee to property in England, does not prevail in the United States." The
bankrupt law of a foreign country cannot operate a legal transfer of property here.”
But though the right of a foreign assignee in bankruptcy must, as respects assets
situate in the United States, yield to the claims of domestic creditors, yet such
foreign assignee may maintain suits in our courts, to collect the assets of the bank-
rupt’s estate.* A discharge under a foreign bankrupt law is no bar to an action
on a contract made in this country."
1 3 Story 453. i How. 295. 1 Wall. 223. Ibid. 234. 4 Ibid. 409.
21 Bouy. L. Dict. 188. 73 Pet. 411. 1 Wall. 223. 4 Ibid. 409.
3 1 Doug. 91. 4 Wheat. 194. Insolvency is 8 105 Penn. St. 78.
the state of a person who, from any cause, 9 13 Ibid. 541. 5 Ibid. 369. 1 W.N. GC. 601
is unable to pay his debts, in the ordinary and 1° 105 Penn. St. 81.
usual course of trade. 17 W. N.C, 289. ll 17 How. 322.
: 4 Wheat. 122. There is now no such lawin 12 5 Cr. 289. 1 Brock. 62,
‘orce, 185 BIO. 0. 349. 5 W. & 8.9. 2 Ash. 485.
ae 20 Penn. St. 440. 12 Wheat. 213. 1 Wall. 4 4 Wheat. 209. Pet. C. 0 8. 2 Mas. 162,
: 40 Mo. 204,
6 12 Wheat. 213, 6 Pet, 348. 14 Ibid. 67. 5
[ 227 ]
Banks,
I. Acts of assembly relating to hanks and bank- III. Of cheoks.
ing companies. IV. Liabilities of banks,
II. Of bank-notes,
I. Act of 16 Aprit 1850. Purd. 188.
Seor. 20. If any president, cashier, director or any other officer or clerk of any
such bank, shall fraudulently embezzle or appropriate to his own use, or to the use
of any other person or persons, any money or other property belonging to said insti-
tion, or left with the same as a special deposit or otherwise, he or they, upon
conviction of such offence, shall be fined in any amount not less than the sum so
appropriated or embezzled, and sentenced to. undergo imprisonment in the proper
state penitentiary, to be kept in separate and solitary confinement at hard labor, for
any term not exceeding five years: Provided, That this shall not prevent any person
or persons aggrieved from pursuing his, her or their civil remedy against such
person or persons.
Szor. 22. It shall not be lawful for any such bank to issue and put in circulation
any bill or note of said bank payable at any other place than at said bank, or other-
wise than payable on demand, and of a denomination less than five dollars ;? and
any violation of this section by any officer of any such bank, shall be a misde.
meanor, punishable, upon conviction, by a fine of not less than five hundred dollars,
and imprisonment in the jail of the proper county not less than one year.
Sect. 26. Whenever any demand for specie shall be made by a note-holder of
any bank, subject to the provisions of this act, it shall be the duty of the cashier
or other officer of the bank upon whom such demand is made to pay one-fifth of the
amount of such demand in American gold coin, if the same shall be requested by
the note-holder making such demand: Provided, That the one-fifth of such demand
be not less in amount than five dollars.
Srct. 48. From and after the twenty-first day of August 1850, it shall not be
lawful for any person or persons, corporation or body corporate, directly or indi-
rectly to issue, pay out, pass, exchange, put in circulation, transfer or cause to be
issued, paid out, passed, exchanged, circulated or transferred, any bank-note, note,
bill, certificate, or any acknowledgment of indebtedness whatsoever, purporting to
be a bank note, or of the nature, character or appearance of a bank note, or caleu-
lated for circulation as a bank-note, issued, or purporting to be issued by any bank
or incorporated company, or association of persons, not located in Pennsylvania, of
a less denomination than five dollars ; every violation of the provisions of this section
by any corporation or body corporate, shall subject such corporation or body cor-
porate to the payment of five hundred dollars; and any violation of the provisions
of this section by any public officer holding any office or appointment of honor or
profit under the constitution and laws of this state, shall subject such officer to the
payment of one hundred dollars; and any violation of this section by any other per:
son, not being a public officer, shall subject such person to the payment of twenty-
five dollars, one-half of which, in each case above mentioned, shall go to the informer,
and the other half to the county in which the suit is brought, and may be sued
for and recovered as debts of like amount are now by law recoverable, in any action
of debt, in the name of the commonwealth of Pennsylvania, as well for the use of
the proper county, as for the person suing.
Szor. 49. In addition to the civil penalties imposed for a violation of the pro-
visions of the last preceding section, every person who shall violate the provisions
of that section, shall be taken and deemed to have committed a misdemeanor, and
shall, upon conviction therof in any criminal court in this commonwealth, be fined
in any sum not less than one dollar, and not more than one hundred dollars; and
the several courts of quarter sessions shall, in their charges to the grand jury, call
1 By the act 17 April 1861, the banks were $1, $2 and $3, to an amount not exceeding 20 per
authorized to issue notes of the denominations of cent. of their capital paid in. Purd. 191.
228 BANKS.
their attention to this subject ; and it shall be the duty of the several grand juries to
make presentment of any person within their respective counties, who may be guilty
of a violation of the provisions of the last preceding section ; and it shall be the
duty of the several constables and other peace officers within this commonwealth,
to make information against any person guilty of such violation, and they shall be
sworn so to do: Provided, That it shall not be necessary, in any civil suit or
criminal prosecution under this section, and the last preceding section, to produce
in evidence, the charter of any bank, or articles of association of any company, not
located in this state.
Aor 1 May 1861. Purd. 500.
Szor. 36. Every president, director, cashier, teller, clerk or agent of any bank
who shall embezzle, abstract or wilfully misapply any of the moneys, funds or credits
of such bank, or shall, fraudulently, without authority from the directors, issue or
put in circulation any of the notes of such bank, or shall, without such authority,
fraudulently issue or put forth any certificate of deposit, draw any order or bill of
exchange, make any acceptance, sign any note, bond, draft, bill of exchange, mort-
gage or other instrument of writing, or shall make any false entry on any book,
report or statement of the bank, with an intent, in either case, to injure or defraud
such bank, or to injure or defraud any other company, body corporate or politic, or
any individual person, or to deceive any officer or agent appointed to inspect the
affairs of any bank, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor ; and upon conviction
thereof, shall be confined in the penitentiary, at hard labor, not less than one, nor
more than ten years.
Aot 31 Marca 1860. Purd. 187.
Suor. 64. If any cashier of any bank of this commonwealth shall engage directly
or indirectly in the purchase or sale of stock, or in any other profession, occupation
or calling, other than that of his duty as cashier, he shall be guilty of a misdemeanor,
and, being thereof convicted, shall be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding five
hundred dollars.
II. OF BANK-NOTES.
BANK-NOTES are treated as money, or cash, in the ordinary course of transac.
tions of business, by common consent, which gives them the credit and currency
of money to every effectual purpose. A payment in current bank-notes discharges
the debt, although, in consequence of the previous failure of the bank, of which
both parties were ignorant, the notes were of no value at the time of payment.
In delivering the opinion in the supreme court, in the case of Gray v. Donohue,
Judge Sergeant remarks: ‘‘ No principle is better established, none more necessary
to be maintained, than that bank-notes are not money in the legal sense of the word.
They are not a legal tender as money, either in the ordinary transactions of business,
or in the collection of debts by legal process. Coin struck at the mint, or author-
ized by act of congress, are alone lawful money.’
When a person passes a bank-note, though he does not engage to be responsible
for its payment at the bank, yet he virtually undertakes that it is what it purports
to be; and if it proves to be forged, the consideration has failed, and he is account-
able for the money.* Nor, if objected to, are bank-notes a valid tender; but, if not
objected to, the tender is good.®
The holder of bank-notes may insist upon payment in gold or silver coin, aud is
not obliged to receive foreign gold or silver coin, or the bills of the bank, or any
other bills, in payment, and is entitled to be paid their numerical value in specie,
and cannot be compelled to take the value fixed upon them by the brokers and
speculators.® It is not necessary to tender back a counterfeit bank-note, to author-
ize a recovery of the consideration given for it.’
If a payment in bank-notes be proved without showing of what denomination,
they will be presumed to have been of the lowest denomination in circulation? —
1 ] Binn. 457. 6 1 Ohio 222.
3 1W. &S. 92. 71 B. Monr. 195. See 13 S. & R. 319% 2
; Tisch 16% Geen, Evid. 3 124,
Be ai 2 Greenl. Evid. 3 129 a. Ibid. 3 255,
BANKS. 229
In Martin v. Bank U. S.,* it was held, that a bank was bound to pay the amount
of a bank-note, one-half of which is presented, on proof of the loss or destruction
of the other half; or that the other half has by fraud or accident got out of the
possession of the bond fide owner. So, in the Bank of Virginia v, Ward,? it was
decided, that the bond fide owner of a bank-note, and holder of one-half, having
transmitted the other half thereof by mail, which was stolen or lost, may demand
payment from the bank of the whole note, on fully proving the loss, and giving a
satisfactory indemnity to the bank.
A certificate of deposit, payable to the order of the depositor, ondy on the return
of the certificate, is not a negotiable instrument.
III. Or CHECKS.
Bank CHECKS, or drafts on banks, are instruments by means of which a creditor
may assign to a third person, not originally party to the contract, the legal as well
as equitable interest in a debt raised by it, so as to vest in such assignee a right
of action against the original debtor. A check operates as an appropriation of the
fund, from the time of its presentment, and extinguishes a debt due by the depositor
to the bank, if drawn in payment.® But the holder of a check cannot maintain
an action against the bank, though in funds, for a refusal to accept.®
Checks are considered as bills of exchange, and the holder must use due diligence
in presenting them for payment.’ Without proof of a due presentment, and prompt
notice of dishovor, the holder of a check on a bank cannot resort to the drawer.® If,
however, the drawer had no funds in the bank, at the time of drawing the check,
presentment and notice may be dispensed with. But if the drawer had funds in the
bank, at the time the check was drawn, the subsequent shifting of the balance will
not take the case out of the general rule The indorser of a check, drawn for his
accommodation, and who is bound to provide funds to meet it, is not entitled to
notice of non-payment. The neglect to make due presentment of a check will
postpone it to a subsequent attachment against the drawer.
No days af grace are allowed on a post-dated check, drawn on a bank or banker ;
nor on a check payable at a future day.*
A check drawn by one person in favor of another, and paid to the latter, is pre-
sumed to have been received on account of a debt shown to have existed at the
time A check is prima facie evidence of payment; but this may be disproved.’
So of a paid check, drawn by the debtor’s wife, in the absence of any other trans-
action to which it could be applied.* But a check payable to A. or bearer is not
evidence of a payment to A.” Otherwise, if credited to A. on the books of the
bank.* A check is not proof of payment, without showing that the drawer had
funds to meet it.’ A paid check is not evidence of indebtedness.” A payment by
check is good, if the bank would have paid the same, had it been presented on the
day on which it was received, though the drawer failed, before it was presented.”
A post-dated check is a negotiable instrument, and available in the hands of an
indorser for value, notwithstanding a failure of consideration between the original
parties, and though received in payment of an antecedent debt.” Delay in the
presentation of a check does not discharge the drawer, unless he be damnified
thereby; but he is entitled to notice of non-payment.” A check received from a
customer is presumed to be a cash deposit.* If the drawer be not in funds to pay
the amount of a check, it is the duty of the bank to pay whatever amount may be
14 W. 0. C. 253. 474, 6 Phila. 170. 1 Ibid. 176.
26 Munf. 166-9. 14 29 Penn. St. 128. 60 Ibid. 170.
$6 W.& S. 227. 8 Ibid.,861. 28 Penn. St. 15 60 Ibid. 170. 6 Phila. 576. See2 W.N.C.
152, 396. 4 Whart. 226.
41H. BI. 602. 16 33 Penn. St. 235.
5 87 Penn. St. 55. See 103 Ibid. 326. 778. &R. 116.
6 100 Ibid. 23. 106 Ibid. 460. 10 Wall. 152. 18 4 W. 46.
107 Mass. 45. 19 8 Ibid. 304.
7 6 Cow. 490. 6 Wend. 445. 27 5.& R.116. 13 Penn. St.177. 29 Ibid.
8 31 Penn. St. 100. 128.
9 Ibid. 3 Phila. 54. 218 W.N. C. 102.
-© Thid. 22 4 Whart. 252. See 103 Penn. St. 81.
1l 1 Phila, 205, 23 2 Phila. 111.
12 2 Miles 327, % % 62 Penn. St. 88.
% Act 30 March 1875, Purd. 221, 70 Penn. St.
230 BARRATOR.
to his credit, if the holder be willing to receive the same, and to endorse the pay-
ment on the check.?
IV. LIABILITIES OF BANKS.
A bank is not liable for the loss of special deposits, either of cash or other
articles, through the dishonesty of any of their officers, provided they take the
same care of them that they do of their own specie. The bank is liable for all acts
of their officers, which pertain to their official duty : for correct entries, for all mis-
takes of their clerks, for not giving due notice on notes left for collection, &e., and
for all their acts done within the scope of their authority. On general deposits,
however, the bank is liable for all losses, however arising ; the privilege given by
charter to discount on moneys deposited applying to general deposits only.’ But
the bank is not chargeable with any geheral deposits made with an officer who is
not the one specially authorized ; as to a book-keeper, for instance, unless the money
actually comes into the coffers of the bank, or the book-keeper is then acting for
the teller, in his absence.*
A bank which receives a note for collection, and when it is over due, places it in
the hands of a notary, in the usual course, is not liable for the neglect of the notary
to give notice to an indorser. A note had been deposited by the holder in a bank
for collection; when it fell due and remained unpaid, it was placed as usual in
the hands of the bank’s notary, whose clerk called at the store of G., the last
indorser, to inquire for the place of residence of C., the first indorser; the wife
of G., who was in the store, told the clerk that C. resided at a particular place,
which was in fact the place of business of C.’s son; notice was left at that
place, and G. was informed of his wife’s direction as to the place of residence of
C.; the note was renewed by agreement between the parties, and when it again
fell due, the notary’s clerk again left a notice at the place of business of C.’s son,
supposing that it was the store of C., by which mistake C. was discharged: held,
that neither the bank, nor its agent, the notary, was liable to the holder of the note
for the consequences of the omission to give notice to the indorser.®
A bank is responsible for the money of depositor, notwithstanding a fraud perpe-
trated by its officers in inducing him to accept their certificate of deposit as that
of the bank.® If asavings-bank pay out money on a forged order, without requiring
compliance with a by-law, printed in the depositor’s pass-book, such payment is in
its own wrong, though the pass-book was produced at the time.’ Otherwise, if
such payment were made in strict compliance with the by-law.®
arrator,
Aot 31 Marcu 1860. Purd. 478.
Szor. 9. If any person shall be proved and adjudged a common barrator, vexing
others with unjust and vexatious suits,® he shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and on
conviction, be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding one hundred dollars, or undergo an
imprisonment not exceeding one year or both, or either, at the discretion of the court.”
A justice of the peace may be indicted as a common barrator for exciting prose-
cutions for offences ; and it is not a sufficient defence that the prosecutions were not
groundless, if he excited them with a view of exacting fees for afterwards suppress-
ing them."
The party must be a common barrator, not in-one or two, but in many instances.”
The proof must show at least three instances of offending.
19 Phila, 522. Co. R. 109.
217 Mass. 479. This is not, in all cases, the 6 93 Penn. St. 376. Ibid. 393.
measure of due diligence; the bank is held to T 91 Ibid. 315.
care and diligence proportiuned to the subject 8 92 Ibid. 134,
matter of the contract. 79 Penn, St. 106. 22 ® See 3 L. Law Rev. 139.
Pitts. L. J.157. See 62 Penn. St. 47. 72 Thid. 1 See 8 Co. 36 b. Co. Litt. 368. 4 Bl. Com. 134
471. 85 Ibid. 391. Ibid. 91. 106 U.S, 609. {1 ] Bailey 379. See 2 Cr. C. C. 60
3°17 Mass. 479. Bara Ge. :
44 Johns, 382,
5 4 Whart. 105. 1 M.173. And see 1 Che
[ 231 ]
Beneficial Societies.
A BENEFICIAL SOCIETY is an association supported by subscription for the mutual
relief of the members or their wives, children, relatives or other nominees, against
casualties, such as sickness, old age, widowhood, &c.
Such societies are now incorporated under the act of 6th April 1893.1 But the act
of 28th April 1876, provides, that the individual members of unincorporated societies
shall not be individually liable for the payment of periodical or funeral benefits, or
other liabilities of the organization, which shall be payable only out of the treasury
thereof? Such societies are exempted from the provisions of the acts of 1876 and
1883, relating to insurance companies.* A beneficial society incorporated by another
state, is not liable for the penalty imposed on foreign insurance companies for trans-
acting business in this state, without authority of law.
As a general rule, a member of such society is entitled to relief only from the
date of his application, not from the time his sickness or disability accrued. But
no action will lie to compel payment of the weekly benefits; the society does not
consent to expose itself to the costs and vexation of an action for every weekly
pittance that may be in arrear. The only remedy, in such case, is by writ of
mandamus.§
The charters of such societies generally provide for the expulsion of a member
as a punishment for certain acts contrary to his duty as a corporator, and it is the
exercise of this power that gives rise to most of the questions that come before
the courts. When the charter provides for an offence, directs the mode of proceed-
ing, and authorizes the society, on conviction of a member, to expel him, this
expulsion, if the proceedings are not irregular, is conclusive, and cannot be inquired
into collaterally by the courts.’ But if there be any irregularity in the proceed-
ings, the courts will interfere by mandamus, and compel the society to restore the
party to all his rights as a member.® It is irregular, to expel a member without giving
him an opportunity of being heard in his defence, before the society at large; he
ought not to be expelled on the report of'a committee of investigation.® The return
to a mandamus must show that the party had notice to appear and defend himself,
that an assembly of the proper persons was duly held, the proceedings before them,
a conviction of the offence, and an actual amotion by them.”
In case of the illegal expulsion of a member, he is entitled to recover damages
according to the extent of the injury." And for the purpose of fixing the amount
of his damages, he may show that, since his expulsion, he has been in a condition
that entitled him to the aid of the society, under its constitution and by-laws.”
A by-law which provides that the widow of a deceased member shall receive a
certain sum from the funds of the society, provided his death were not caused by
intemperance, is a reasonable one. And so is one suspending the payment of
weekly benefits to sick members, unless there be a certain amount in the treasury.”
The fund payable on the death of a member goes to his children, if there be no
widow; it is not assets for the payment of debts,"° But a wife who has separated
herself from her husband for several years is not entitled to the allowance for
funeral expenses. Where a charter provides, that a member may make a new
direction of the fund payable at his decease, such application thereof can only be
made in the form prescribed.”
1 Purd. 215, See the acts of 6 April 1893, Ibid. of equity will restore a member who has been
217, 23 May 1891, and 24 May 1893, Ibid. 219, illegatly expelled. 1 Del. %o. R. 317,
az to subordinate lodges and payment of bene- 915 Penn. St. 251. 10 Daly 262.
fits. 10 [bid.
§Tbid. 219. 11 20 Ibid, 425.
8 Ibid. 1053, 1054. = ees
494 Penn. St. 481. id. ‘
53 Wo 8, 218. 14 92 Ibid. 510. And see 93 Ibid. 277.
6 2 Whart. 313. If the society be unincorpo- 15 92 Ibid. 69.
rated, a bill of equity will lie. 8 W. N.C. 417. 16 82 Ibid. 166.
And see 35 Leg. Int. 28. 1792 Ibid. 50. See 2 Chest. Co. R. 47. 78:
78 W.&S., 247. Penn. St. 133. 6 W. N.C. 496,
850 Penn. St. 107, 15 Ibid. 251. A court
[ 232 J
Bible, Family. ©
A LrarF extracted from a family bible, containing entries of births and deaths of
children, sworn to by some of the children, is good evidence. aoe
In an action against a justice of the peace bya parent, to recover the penalty for
marrying his minor son, the entry in the family bible of the son’s birth, proved by the
oath of the plaintiff, is competent evidence of the minority of the son. ;
But although the entry in a family bible is admissible to prove the date of a birth,
it is secondary evidence; and its admissibility for such purpose is subject to the gene-
ral rule, that primary evidence must be adduced, if it can be obtained. : It cannot be
received where the person who made the entry is present in court, or within reach of
process.‘
Bicycles.
ICYCLES, tricycles and all vehicles propelled by hand or foot, and all persons by
ia bicycles, Eravaled and such other vehicles are used, ridden or propelled upon
the public highways of this state, shall be entitled to the same rights and subject to
the same restrictions, in the use thereof, as are prescribed by law in the cases of
person using carriages drawn by horses.®
Biqamy.
IF ANY PERSON shall have two wives or two husbands at one and the same time,
he or she shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and on conviction, be sentenced to pay
a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars, and to undergo an imprisonment, by
separate and solitary confinement at labor, not exceeding two years, and the second
marriage shall be void: Provided, That if any husband or wife, upon any false
Tumor, in appearance well founded, of the death of the other (when such other has
been absent for two whole years), hath married, or shall matry again, he or she shall
not be liable to the penalties of fine and imprisonment imposed by this act.®
If any man or woman being unmarried, shall knowingly marry the husband or wife
of another person, such man or woman shall, on conviction, be sentenced to pay a fine
not exceeding five hundred dollars, and undergo an imprisonment by separate or soli-
tary confinement at labor not exceeding two years.”
In a prosecution for bigamy, the confession of the defendant is adequate evidence
of the first marriage.2 On an indictment for bigamy, an actual marriage must be
proved ; reputation and cohabitation are not sufficient.’ The second wife is a compe-
tent witness either for or against the prisoner.
To bring a case within the proviso to the 34th section of the act of 31st March
1860, there must be a general report, that the husband or wife died at some particular
place, was shipwrecked, or lost his or her life in some way which the report specifies?
To give jurisdiction to our courts, the second marrriage, which constitutes the
offence, must have been contracted in Pennsylvania.” So, if, ina foreign country, a
man marries a second wife in the lifetime of his first, and after the death of his first
wife, but the second living, marries a third time in this state, the case is not within
the statute; because the second marriage was simply void.!8
The offence of bigamy is not a felony; it ‘3 but a misdemeanor.'4
‘2 Dall. 116. 1.15. officer had no authority to perform the marriage
710 W. 82. 1 Greenl. Evid. 2 104, ceremony. 8 L. Bar, 57.
5 23 Texas 252. 102 Tred. 346, 1 East, P.C. 469. See 15 Cox
“1 McCord 165. 3 Wend. 376. C. C. 328,
5 Act 23 April 1889, Purd. 220, 112 Wh. Cr. Cas. 79. See 12 Cox C. C. 237.
8 Act 31 March 1860 2 34. Purd. 478, 1) Whart. Cr. L, 2 2627.
T Ibid. 2 35. 13.2 Park. 195. And see 27 Hun. 310.
81 Ash, 272. 3 Brewst. 338, 10 Phila, 209. M4 2 Pars. 453. 1 Phila, 77. See 12 Cox 0.0.
97 Greenl. 58. But itis no defence, that the 193, :
*
[ 233 ]
Bills of Exchange.
I. Nature of a bill of exchange. V. Presentment for payment.
II. Transfer of bills of exchange. VI. Notice of dishonor.
TIT. Acceptance of a bill. VII. Actions on bills of exchange.
IV. Days of grace. VITI. Damages on protested bills.
I. NATURE OF A BILL OF EXCHANGE.
A BILL OF EXCHANGE is an open letter of request addressed by one person to a
second, desiring him to pay a sum of money to a third, or to any other to whom
that third person shall order it to be paid, or it may be made payable to bearer.t
The person who makes the bill is called the drawer, he to whom it is addressed
the drawee, and when he undertakes to pay the amount, he is then called the
acceptor. The person to whom it is ordered to be paid is called the payee, and if
he appoint another to receive the money, that other is called the indorsee, as the
payee is with respect to him the indorser; any one who happens, for the time, to
be in possession of the bill is called the holder of it.
The time at which the payment is limited to be made is various, according to the
circumstances of the parties, and the distance of their respective residence. Some-
times the amount is mdde payable at sight, sometimes at so many days after sight,
at other times at a certain distance from the date. Usance is the time of one, two or
three months after the date of the bill, according to the custom of the places
between which the exchanges run, and the nature of which must therefore be
shown and averred in a declaration on such a bill. Double or treble usance is
double or treble the usual time; and half usance is half the time. Where the
time of payment is limited by months, it must be computed by calendar, not lunar
months; and where one month is longer than the succeeding one, it is a rule not
to go in the computation into a third. Thus, on a bill dated the 28th, 29th, 30th
or 31st of January, and payable one month after date, the time expires on the 28th
of February, in common years, and in the three latter cases in leap-year on the
29th (to which are to be added the days of grace). Where a bill is payable at so
many days after sight or from the date, the day of presentment, or of the date,
is excluded. Thus, where a bill, payable ten days after sight, is presented on
the first day of a month, the ten days expire on the eleventh: where it is
dated the first, and payable twenty days after date, these expire on the twenty-
first.
Bills of exchange are foreign or inland. Foreign, when the drawer resides in
one country and the drawee in another. Inland, when both the drawer and the
drawee reside in the same kingdom But a bill drawn in one of the United States
upon a person in another of the United States, is a foreign and not an inland bill
of exchange, and subject to all the law of evidence and damage of foreign bills.‘
It is not essential to the validity of a bill of exchange that it be in form nego-
tiable; nor that it should contain the words “ for value received.”” If it be fer
the absolute payment of money, at all events, it will not invalidate it, if the fund
on account of which it is drawn be named as a means whereby the drawee is to be
indemnified ® .
By the act of 5th April 1849, § 11, it is provided that bills of exchange, &e.,
made payable with the current rate of exchange, or in current funds, or with such
like qualifications superadded, shall be deemed negotiable by indorsement, and the
indorsees may recover thereon in their own names.®
1 1 Bouv. Inst. 353, 456. See 2 Brewst. 481. 6 2 Pet. 586. 10 Ibid. 579. 12 Ibid. 54, 6
2 Whart. 233. 10 Penn. St. 28. Whart. 414.
21 Ld. Raym. 281. 2 Str. 829. 5 31 Penn. St. 506.
5 Chitty on Bills 9. § Purd. 220.
”
234 BILLS OF EXCHANGE.
II. TRANSFER OF BILLS OF EXCHANGE,
In the case of a bill payable to A., for the use of B., the right of transfer is only
in A., because b. has only an equitable and not a legal interest.’ ;
A bill of exchange may be drawn by an agent, so also it may be indorsed by a
person acting in that capacity—in which case he must expressly indorse as agent,
as “ E. F. per proc. A. B.,” or he may write the name of his principal.”
A qualified indorsement may be thus: “I hereby indorse, assign and transfer
my right and interest in this bill to C. D. or order, but with this express condition,
that I shall not be liable to the said C.D., or any holder, for the acceptance or
payment of such bill, A. B.;” or the form may be, as in France, by the indorser
writing his name, and subscribing, ‘‘ without recourse tome.” ;
The indorsee of over-due paper takes it exelusively on the credit of the indorser,
and subject, even without proof of mala fides [bad faith], to all the intrinsic con-
siderations that would affect it between the original parties; but where there is no
direct evidence of the time of transfer, the presumption is, that it was made in the
usual course of commercial business, and consequently, before the day of payment.’
The presumption is, that the indorsee of negotiable paper received it bond fide,
in due course of business, and for a valuable consideration. To put him to the
proof of his title, and the consideration paid for it, the defendant must make out a
prima facie case, that it was obtained by undue means, as by fraud, felony or force,
or that it was lost and afterwards put in circulation.*
If the drawee of a bill, who has not accepted, discount it for the payee, he
acquires the right of an indorsee for value, and may sue the drawer and indorser,
in case of its dishonor at maturity.®
III. AccEPTANCE OF A BILL.
Acceptance, in its ordinary signification, is an engagement by the drawee, to pay
the bill, when due, in money.® If one accept a forged bill, he is bound in law to
ay it.7
The acceptor of a bill of exchange is not to be admitted to vary the terms of his
acceptance, by parol evidence.* Where a bill is accepted “ payable when in funds,”
the burden is upon the plaintiff to show that the acceptors were in funds.®
“The acceptor of a bill is to be considered as the principal debtor, and the other
parties as sureties only; the holder, therefore, who is the creditor, ought not so to
negotiate with the acceptor, as to prejudice the remaining parties to the bill. If a
creditor give time to the principal debtor, the collateral securities are discharged,
both in law and equity.””° If the holder of a bill compound with, and discharge
the acceptor, he cannot afterwards resort to the other parties. But merely receiving
partial payments from the acceptor, without. releasing him, does not affect the
liability of the other parties.”
The act of 10th May 1881 provides, that no person, within this state, shall be
charged as an acceptor, on a bill of exchange, draft or order drawn for the pay-
ment of money, exceeding twenty dollars, unless his acceptance shall be in writing,
signed by himself, or his lawful agent.!?
IV. Days or GRAOE.
A custom has obtained, among merchants, that a person to whom a bill is ad-
dressed, shall be allowed a few days for payment beyond the term mentioned in
the bill, called days of grace. In Great Britain and Ireland (and in the United
States of America), three days are given; in other places more. If the last of these
three days happen to be Sunday, the bill is be paid on Saturday. These days of
grace are not allowed on bills or notes payable on demand.®
It is provided by the act 21st May 1857, that all drafts and bills of exchange
1 Chitty on Bills 123. 8
? Ibid. 132. 9 ia ee
6 Penn. St. 164, 10 3 Bos
4 29 Ibid. 365. 43 Ibid. 137. wena
5 40 Ibid. 186, 14 Purd. 221.
8 Byles on Bills 148. 13 Byles on Bills 162.
1 4 Dall. 235,
BILLS OF EXCHANGE, 235
drawn at sight, shall be and become due and payable on presentation, without grace,
and shall and may, if dishonored, be protested on and immediately after such pre-
sentation.’ And the act 30th March 1875 provides, that days of grace shall be allowed
upon all pills of exchange, drafts, promissory notes, or other instruments negotiable
by the laws of this commonwealth, excepting only bills of exchange and drafts drawn
at sight, and checks drawn upon banks and bankers, whether payable upon presenta-
tion, or upon some day or time subsequent to the date of issue.”
The act 31st May 1893,5 designates the following holidays: New Year's day, Wash-
ington’s birthday, Good Friday, Decoration or Memorial day, Fourth of July, Labor day,
Fall Election day, Thanksgiving day and Christmas day; and every Saturday afternoon
is declared a legal half:holiday. The act 23d May 1893,* designates the Spring Election
day as a legal half-holiday. All bills, &., presentable on said days are made payable
on the next succeeding business day, except those falling due on Saturday, which are
payable before noon of that day, a protest cannot be had until the next business day.
When New Year’s day, Washington's birthday, Fourth of July or Christmas day fall
on Sunday, the following Monday is declared a public holiday; but when Decoration
day falls on Sunday, the previous Saturday is declared a legal holiday. Bills falling
due on Sunday are made payable on the next business day.
V. PRESENTMENT FOR PAYMENT.
Payment of a bill of exchange must be demanded on the day of maturity, at the
place to which it isjddressed. And demand at such place is sufficient to found a
notice of dishonor ih the other parties, unless, perhaps, when the holder knows the
true place of business of the acceptor, in time to present it there.®
A bill of exchange, in the absence of anything to indicate a different place, will be
presumed to be addressed to the drawee at his residence, or place of business.®
It is provided by the act of 21st May 1857, that the presentment for payment of
any bill or bills of exchange, made or to be made elsewhere than in this common-
wealth, at an office or house referred to only in the margin of the bill, or below the
name of the drawee, shall not be so construed as to charge the indorsers for non-pay-
ment, unless such office or house was, at the date of the bill, the actual place of busi-
ness or residence of the drawee, or is distinctly expressed as such in the said reference,
or unless it appear by the certificate of protest that upon diligent inquiry the place of
business or residence of such drawee could not be found.’
The holder is entitled to a reasonable time in which to present it for payment ; what
is such reasonable time must depend upon the circumstances of the case.®
VI. NoricE oF DISHONOR.
The holder of a bill of exchange must use reasonable diligence to ascertain the resi-
dence of the drawer, for the purpose of giving him notice of its dishonor. It is not
sufficient to look for the drawer at the place where the bill is dated, if his residence is
elsewhere. Notice left with the family of a seafaring man, during his absence at sea,
is sufficient.® :
Notice of protest is not required to render a firm liable on an endorsement, where
all the members of the firm are members of the house which drew the bill.”
The holder of a bill of exchange is not obliged to notify all the ‘parties toit. Itis
sufficient to notify the party he intends to hold liable. And each indorser has an
entire day to give notice to his predecessor on the bill.*
Notice of dishonor sent to the place of date is sufficient, unless the holder knows
that the date does not truly indicate the residence. The rule seems to be, that if
the residence be shown to be elsewhere in the same state, due diligence to ascer-
1 Paord. is 7 Purd. 221.
ste / 8 84 Penn. St. 464.
3 Purd. 986 95 Binn. 541. 5 Penn. St. 178.
4 Ibid. 987. 10 3 Penn. St. 399.
5 27 Penn. St. 249. 30 Ibid. 139. 11 30 Ibid. 129.
6 Thid.
236 BILLS OF EXCHANGE,
tain it must be proved, and that notice was sent accordingly, unless the removal
took place after the drawing of the bill.’ A
A drawer, without funds, or reasonable expectation thereof, is not entitled to
notice of dishonor.? :
VII. AoTrons ON BILLS OF EXOHANGE.
The holder of negotiable paper may sue on it in his own name, although but an
agent or trustee for others. An accommodation acceptor, paying a bill, for which
no funds have been provided, can recover from the drawer, for the law implies a
contract to indemnify.* It is no defence to a bill in the hands of an indorsee, that
the consideration has failed as between the original parties.' It is no objection to
an action by the drawer against the acceptor of a bill, that it has not been indorsed
by the payee.
The onus of showing that an alteration in a material part of a negotiable instru-
ment was lawfully made, is on the holder. And where the place of payment is in
a different handwriting from the body of the instrument, there is a presumption of
alteration.”
Any material alteration of commercial paper, unaccounted for by the holder,
is fatal to a recovery upon it. An indorsee takes an altered bill with all its
imperfections, and is bound to explain them; if the alteration be apparent, and
uuexplained, the bill cannot be received in evidence.®
The maker of negotiable paper is always presumed, in the absence of evidence,
to have issued it clear of all blemishes, erasures and alterations, whether of the
date or body of the instrument; and the burden of showing that it was defective,
when issued, is upon the holder, even though the alteration be beneficial to the
maker.”
Whenever any bill of exchange, &., shall be negotiated or paid, and the sig-
natures of any of the parties shall have been forged, the indorsee or payee may
recover back from the previous party the amount so paid for the same, with lawful
interest, from demand of repayment." This act was only declaratory of the existing
law. Notice of the forgery within a reasonable time after its discovery, and an
offer to return the bill, are necessary to the maintenance of an action for the
recovery of the consideration paid, unless waived by the defendant, or the bill be
shown to possess no value.”
If the holder of a bill discharge a party who is liable to pay it, he thereby dis-
charges all other parties whose liability was subsequent. But this effect is not
produced by the holder’s discharging a party who would not be liable to the other
parties, though prior to them.'®
VIII. DAMAGES ON PROTESTED BILLs.
Whenever any bill of exchange, to be drawn or indorsed after the 1st day of
August 1850, within this commonwealth, upon any person or persons, or body cor-
porate, of or in any other state, territory or place, shall be returned for non-acceptance
or non-payment, with a legal protest, the person or persons to whom the same shall or
may be payable, shall be entitled to recover and receive of and from the drawer
or drawers, or the indorser or indorsers of such bill of exchange, the damages here-
inafter specified, over and above the principal sum for which such bill of exchange
shail have been drawn, and the charges of protest, together with lawful interest on
the amount of such principal sum, damages and charges of protest from the time
at which notice of such protest shall have been given, and the payment of said
principal sum and damages and charges of protest demanded, that is to say: if
such bill shall have been drawn upon any person or persons, or body corporate, of
or in any of the United States or territories thereof, excepting Upper and Lower
: 2 nae 249, : en St. 186. 19 Ibid. 178. 27 Ibid, 244.
i id, 259,
8 52 Penn. St. 393. 10 32 Thid. 423.
4 44 Ibid. 356, 1 Act 5 April 1849. Purd, 222.
5 54 Ibid. 398. 12 30 Penn. St, 145, 527.
6 7 Ibid. 527. 8 11Mass, 85.
7 9 Ibid. 186,
BONDS. . 237
California, New Mexico and Oregon, five per cent. upon such principal eum; and
if upon Upper or Lower California, New Mexico or Oregon, ten per cent. upon
such principal sum; and if upon China, India or other parts of Asia, Africa or
islands in the Pacific Ocean, twenty per cent. upon such principal sum; and if
upon Mexico, the Spanish Main, West Indies or other Atlantic islands, east coast
of South America, Great Britain or other places in Europe, ten per cent. upon such
principal sum ; and if upon places on the west coast of South America, fifteen per
cent. upon such principal sum; and if upon any other part of the world, ten per cent.
upon such principal sum.
The damages which by this act are to be recovered upon any bill of exchange,
shall be in lieu of interest and all other charges, except the charges of protest, to
the time when notice of the protest and demand of payment shall have been given
and made as aforesaid; and the amount of such bill and of the damages payable
thereon, as specified in this act, shall be ascertained and determined by the rate of
exchange, or value of the money or currency mentioned in such bill, at the time
of notice of protest and demand of payment as before mentioned.”
On a bill drawn in another state, the Jex loct governs ; and, in such case it is not
necessary that the bill be returned to the place where drawn, to entitle the holder
to damages. Damages are not recoverable from the acceptor. By the law merchant,
the acceptor of a bill of exchange is not liable for re-exchange, and our statute has
regard only to drawers and indorsers* The damages may be recovered without
being specially demanded in the declaration. -
Damages on a foreign bill, protested for non-payment, are recoverable at the rate
of exchange at the time of presentment to the drawer for payment, accompanied
with notice of protest, and not at the rate at the time when notice of protest was
received by the drawer, without a presentment of the bill® Damages are not
recoverable, if the bill was neither paid nor received in satisfaction of a precedent
debt.’ If remitted at the risk of the debtor here, he is entitled to the damages,
and not the foreign creditor. The damages allowed by the statute are a compen-
sation for interest, damages and re-exchange; and the holder may recover the
amount of the bill aud damages, with interest on the whole from the date of
rotest.?
: A bill dated at Philadelphia, signed here in blank, and sent abroad to be filled
up and there negotiated, is within the act.’
Bonds.
I. Definition and nature of a bond. II. Assignment of bonds.
I. DEFINITION AND NATURE OF A BOND.
A Bonp or obligation is a deed whereby the obligor obliges himself, his heirs,
executors and administrators, to pay a certain sum of money to another at a day
appointed. If this be all, the bond is called a single one; but there is generally a
condition added, that, if the obligor do some particular act, the obligation shall be
void, or else shall remain in full force, as the repayment of a principal sum of
money borrowed of the obligee, with interest, which principal sum is usually one-
half of the penal sum specified in the bond. In case this condition be not
performed, the bond becomes forfeited, and charges the obligor while living, and
his estate after his decease. Nis
If the condition of a bond be impossible, at the time of making it, or be to doa
thing contrary to some rule of law, that is merely positive, or be uncertain, or
insensible, the condition alone is void, and the bond shall stand single and uncon-
ditional ; for it is the folly of the obligor to enter into such an obligation from which
1 Act 13 May 1850 2 6. Purd. 221. 62M. 257. Butsee 1 Y.204. 3 W. CO. C. 125,
2 Act 30 March 1821 @ 2. Ibid. 71 Dall. 261. 4 ¥. 19.
84 Y. 19. 8 4 Dall. 157.
& 8 W. 545. 9 3 Penn. St. 474, 482,
5 3 Penn. St. 474, 482 10 23 Ibid. 137.
938 : BONDS.
he can never be released. If it be to do a thing that is malwm in se [an offence at
common law], the obligation itself is void: for the whole is an unlawful contract,
and the obligor shall take no advantage from such transaction.’ If the condition
of a bond be to do a thing which is contrary to a rule of law merely, and not
malum in se, the bond is single? If the condition of a money bond fix no time of
payment, it is payable forthwith.’ . ;
‘A lapse of twenty years creates a presumption of payment, if no interest has been
paid in the mean time; but, if the period be shorter than twenty years, the pre-
sumption must be supported by circumstances.*
A bond is not avoided by tearing off the seal by the obligor, fraudulently or
inadvertently, without the assent of the obligee.® So, of a stranger tearing off the
seal of a deed of land.®
IJ. AssSIGNMENT OF BONDS.
All bonds, specialties and notes in writing, made or to be made, and signed by
any person or persons, whereby such person or persons is or are obliged or doth
or shall promise to pay to any other person or persons, his, her or their order or
assigns, any sum or sums of money, mentioned in such bonds, specialties, note
or notes, may by the person or persons to whom the same is or are made payable
be assigned, indorsed and made over to such person or persons as shall think fit to
accept thereof.’ The person or persons to whom such bonds, specialties or notes
are or shall be assigned, indorsed or made over, their factors, agents, executors or
assigns, may at his, her or their pleasure again assign, indorse and make over the
same, and so doties quoties.®
It shall and may be lawful for the person or persons to whom the said bonds,
specialties or notes are assigned, indorsed or made over as aforesaid, in his, her or
their own name or names, to commence and prosecute his, her or their actions at
law, for recovery of the money mentioned in such bonds, specialties or notes, or so
much thereof as shall appear to be due at the time of such assignment, in like man-
ner as the person or perscns to whom the same was or were made payable might or
could have done.® In every such action, the plaintiff or plaintiffs shall recover his,
her or their damages and costs of suit; and if such plaintiff or plaintiffs shall be
nonsuited, or a verdict be given against him, her or them, the defendant or
defendants shall recover his, her or their costs against the plaintiff or plaintiffs.”
Every such plaintiff or plaintiffs, defendant or defendants, respectively recovering,
may sue out execution for such damages and costs, in the like manner as is usual
for damages and costs in other cases."
No person or persons shall have power, by virtue of this act, to make, issue or give
out any bonds, specialties or notes, by themselves or servants, than such as they
might have made, issued and given out, if this act had never been made.!?
All assignments made of bonds and specialties shall be under hand and seal before
two or more credible witnesses * Provided, That it shall not be in the power of
the assignors, after assignment made as aforesaid, to release any of the debts or
sums of money really due by the said bonds, specialties or notes.™
The object of this act was to enable an assignee to maintain an action in his own
name.” He takes subject to all the equities existing between the parties at the
time of the assignment ;* and to payments made to the assignor before notice of
the assignment.” But if the assignee, when about to take the assignment, call
upon the obligee to inquire whether the whole money is due, and take the bond in
consequence of his representations, or of his silence as to any defence, he will be
1 2 Bl Com. 274-5. 18 Act 28 J
2168. & R. 307, u Thid. een ea
89 Penn. St. 436. 16 1 Dall. 28. 1 Binn. 433n. 4S, & R. 177.
«2 W. C. C. 323, 9S. & R. 379, 1¥, 344,584, 36 Penn. St. 108,
€ 2.Mas. 478 16 1 Dall. 28. 2 Ibid. 49. 2 ¥. 23. 1 Binn.
® 6 Cow. 746. ¢ 433 n. 2 Ibid.165. 5 Ibid. 232. 48. & R. 177.
a Act 28 May 1715 3 1. Purd. 224. 11 Ibid. 75. 17 Ibid. 287. 1 P. & W. 257. 2
8 Ibid. 2 2. Thid. 245. 8 W. & 8. 318, 36 Ponn. St. 108. 16
: Tid. 3. W.N. C. 421.
Wo Ibid. 4 4, 148, &R.175. 9 Ibid. 74. 5 W. & 8. 219.
: a : 1 Penn. St. 266. 4 W. 0. C. 585.
BOOKS, &c. 939
protected.’ The assignee of an assignee is subject to the same rule? The equity,
however, which will affect an assignee for value only extends to want of consider-
ation and defalcation, and not to collateral agreements between the parties ;*
nor to secret equities residing in strangers. And an equitable assignee of a
bond given by an innocent purchaser will be protected against an unrecorded mort-
gage.
A covenant of guaranty indorsed on a bond does not pass by an assignment of it.®
The covenant implied from the assignment of a bond is not a guarantee, but that
the assignee should receive the money from the obligor to his own use, and if the
obligee should receive it, then the assignor would be answerable over for it.”
Where a bond or other specialty is assigned in the mode prescribed by the act of
1715, that is to say, by an instrument under seal, attested by two or more witnesses,
the legal title vests in the assignee, who must bring suit thereon in his own name.
On the contrary, if the directions of the statute be not pursued, as, for example, if
the assignment be not under seal, or although under seal, if there be but a single
witness, in such case, the assignment is termed an equitable one, and suit must be
brought in the name of the assignor for the use of the assignee. The act of 1715
has no application to a suit so brought.®
Coupon bonds, payable to bearer, issued by incorporated companies, are negotiable
instruments, and pass by delivery.® But, in this state, the coupon bonds of muni-
cipal corporations issued in pursuance of a special authority conferred by statute,
are not negotiable. In this doctrine, however, it is admitted that the courts of
Pennsylvania stand alone.”
Books, Xe.,
Required by a Magistrate.
I. Of the books and forms required. III. The magistrate’s law library.
II. Ruling and paging the dockets, and index-
ing.
I. One of the first considerations which should present itself to the mind of an
alderman or justice of the peace, on the receipt of his commission, is, how he
shall best qualify himself to discharge the duties which have thus been devolved
upon him. In the first place, what books does he require? He should, without
a doubt, have a copy of a digest of the laws of the state, and a copy of the best
guide for justices of the peace which he can procure. These books appear to be
indispensable.
Having obtained and carefully read these books, let him get from the most
experienced justice near him, a copy of each of the blank forms he shall want,
and compare them with the forms which he will find printed in his Justice’s
Guide. Having ascertained the most approved forms, and made the necessary
alterations as to the name and residence of the justice, and such other alterations,
if any, as he may think proper, let him send and have them printed; or perhaps,
in the county town, he may purchase them, ready printed, in such quantities as
he shall be‘advised he may require. Printers in county towns would do the public
a service and, it is hoped, promote their own interests, by always keeping in their
offices the most approved forms of magistrates’ blanks. A justice should purchase
two dockets: one for civil suits, and the other for criminal business. As to the
3 Y. 351.
3 Penn. St. 292. 8 W. 361.
1 Dall. 449. 19 Penn. St. 133.
4 Phila. 346. 44 Penn. St. 63. See 95 Ibid.
12 Y. 541. 1 Binn. 433. 5 Ibid. 234. 9S 2
& R.197. 16 Ibid. 18. 1 P.& W. 24,476. 2 &
Tbid. 245. 3 Whart. 275. 5 W. 151. But he 7
must be an assignee for a valuable consideration.
4 Brewst. 151. 62. A clearing-house due-bill is negotiable. 40
21K, 227. Leg. Int. ge oe
398.& R.141. 1 P. & W. 260.. 8 W.& S. 73 Penn. St. 211.
318. 3 Penn. St. 294. 103 Ibid. 416. 10 37 Penn. St. 230. And see 33 Ibid. 239. 32
49 Penn. St. 399. 3 Gr. 281. Ibid. 230. 43 Ibid. 400.
240 BREAD AND FLOUR.
manner in which the docket-entries shall be made, examples on all the subjects
likely to come before him will hereafter be given. cat
In a small book, provided for that purpose, or in the criminal docket, he should
record the indentures of the apprentices he may bind, and the marriages he may
solemnize, and note any other miscellaneous duties he may perform, to all which
he should have copious and correct indexes.
II. Let the dockets be paged and ruled; the lines at such distance from each
other as your handwriting may require. On the left hand of each page let there
be a perpendicular line drawn with red ink, about two.inches distant from the left
hand edge of the page. The portion of the page thus set apart, on the left hand
of the perpendicular line, to be considered as set apart for the names of the parties,
the costs, &c.; the remainder of the page being appropriated to the docket-entries,
Index your dockets frequently ; that is, in a small book or on a few pages, at the
beginning or ending of the docket itself, alphabetically arranged ; put the name of
the plaintiff and the defendant, together with the page of the docket on which the
docket-entries, relating to that suit, may be found: thus—“ A.B. v. C. D., p. 76.”
With such a guide, the justice may turn to the suit and give whatever information
may be required, at a moment’s notice.
III. The law books required by a magistrate, for the intelligent discharge of the
important duties required of him, are few in number, but these should always be
of the latest editions, so that he may be furnished with the most reliable guide in
a path which, to him, is frequently an untrodden one. 1. In the first place, it is
indispensable that he should possess Purdon’s Digest of the laws of Pennsylvania;
this will give him the complete body of the statute law of the commonwealth, with
the decisions explanatory of it. 2. The justice should have the present work, as a
manual to be constantly referred to, when called upon to exercise his judicial
function. 3. He should have a good Pennsylvania Form Book. The best of these
are Dunlap’s Forms and Graydon’s Forms, either of which will answer his purpose.
4. A good work on Criminal Law is a most useful adjunct to the justice’s office.
Wharton’s American Criminal Law is the latest and best work upon this subject,
and no magistrate ought to be without it. With these books, the justice of the
peace will be enabled, with ordinary care and attention, to discharge his duties to
the satisfaction of the public and of his own conscience. If he desires to obtain a
more extended knowledge of the law, he would do well to procure a copy of Black-
stone’s Commentaries with Judge Sharswood’s notes, by a careful study of which
he may become well grounded in the principles of the common law.
Bread and Flour,
[See ADULTERATION. ]
I. Acts of assembly. II. Warrant against a baker for selling loaf bread.
I. Aor 1 Aprin 1797. Purd. 262.
Szor. 2, All loaf bread made for sale within this commonwealth, shall be sold by
the pound avoirdupois; and every baker or other person offering the same for sale,
shall keep at his or her house, or at such other place at which he or she shall at
any time offer or expose for sale any such bread, sufficient scales and weights, law-
fully regulated, for the purpose of weighing the same; and if any baker or other
person shall sell or offer for sale any loaf bread, in any other manner, the contract
respecting the same shall be void, and the person offending against this act shall,
on conviction, forfeit and pay the sum of ten dollars for every such offence,
one-half to the use of the informer, and the other half to the use of this common-
wealth ; and it shall be the especial duty of the clerk of the market, in any place
where such officer is appointed, to discover and prosecute all persons offending
agalost this act.!
- This act is stil in foree, 3 W. C. 0. 273. Its may, without difficulty, be carried into full opera-
enactments are clearly for the public good; thew tian+ a hannte ie nffarad ta tha nrngaantar: nublia
BREAD AND FLOUR. 241
Act 18 Maron 1775. Purd. 1294.
Srct. 8. The clerks of the several markets within this province, now in ofgce,
and all such clerks as shall hereafter be appointed, before they enter upon the
execution of their office, shall take the following oath or affirmation, before some
magistrate or justice of the city, borough or county wherein they shall reside, viz. :
“ That he will well and truly, to the best of his skill and judgment, do and perform
all things enjoined and required of him as clerk of the market, by the laws of this
rrovince.”
: Act 8 Aprit 1848. Pamph. 417.
Sect. 1. It shall not be lawful for any person within the counties of Bucks,
Montgomery, Philadelphia and Delaware, and the city of Philadelphia, to sell In-
dian corn meal in any other way than by weight; and any person who shall sell
Indian corn meal by measure, or in any other way than by weight, shall be liable, for
each and every offence, to a fine of five dollars, which may be recovered before any
alderman or justice of the peace, as sums of like amount are by law recoverable ;
one-half whereof shall go to the informer, and the other half to the use of the
city or county wherein such conviction takes place: Provided, That nothing herein
contained shall be construed to prohibit the sale of Indian corn meal by the hogs-
head, barrel or half-barrel, as is now provided for by the inspection laws of this
commonwealth.
II. WaRRANT AGAINST A BAKER FOR SELLING LOAF BREAD, &C.
BERKS COUNTY, ss.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To the Constable of H——, in the County of Berks, greeting :
Wuereas, J. L., clerk of the market within the borough of H——, in the county of
Berks, hath made information, on oath, before J. R., one of our justices of the peace in
and for the said county, that G. G., of H—— aforesaid, baker, doth not keep at his house,
in H aforesaid, where he offereth, or exposeth, loaf bread for sale, from time to time,
sufficient scales and weights, lawfully regulated, for the purpose of weighing the same,
contrary to the act of assembly in such case made and provided; you are, therefore, hereby
commanded to take the said G. G., and bring him before the said J. R. forthwith, to
answer the premises,-and further to be dealt with according to law. Witness the said
J. R., at H—— aforesaid, the first day of September, in the year of our Lord one thousand
eight hundred and eighty. J. R., Justice of the Peace. [szat.]
When the defendant is brought before the magistrate, the witnesses should be
examined, and if the charge be proved to the satisfaction of the justice, he should
require bail for the appearance of the defendant, at the next court of quarter ses-
sions, and if the bail be not given, the defendant should be committed.
officers are named, whose “especial duty’ it is and powerful recommendations, this act has never
made, enforced by oath or affirmation, “to dis- been carried into effect! Ought it not to he
cover and prosecute all persons offending against enforced or repealed?
this act”—yet, with all these adequate provisions
16
[ 242 ]
Bribery.
I. Definition of bribery. III. Provisions of the Penal Code.
II. Constitutional provisions. IV. Corrupt solicitation.
I. Brrpery is the receiving or offering of any undue reward, by or to any person
whatsoever, whose ordinary profession or business relates to the administration
of public justice, in order to incline him to do a thing against the known rules of
honesty and integrity.’
II. ConstITUTIONAL PROVISIONS.
A member of the general assembly who shall solicit, demand or receive, or con-
sent to receive, directly or indirectly, for himself or for another, from any company,
corporation or person, any money, office, appointment, employment, testimonial,
reward, thing of value or enjoyment, or of personal advantage, or promise thereof,
for his vote or official influence, or for withholding the same, or with.an under-
standing, expressed or implied, that his vote or official action shall be, in any way,
influenced thereby ; or who shall solicit or demand any such money or other advan-
tage, matter or thing aforesaid, for another, as the consideration of his vote or
official influence, or for withholding the same, or shall give or withhold his vote
or influence, in consideration of the payment or promise of such money, advantage,
matter or thing to another—shall be held guilty of bribery, within the meaning of
this constitution, and shall incur the disabilities provided thereby for said offence,
and such additional punishment as is or shall be provided by law.
Any person who shall, directly or indirectly, offer, give or promise, any money or
thing of value, testimonial, privilege or personal advantage, to any executive or judi-
cial officer, or member of the general assembly, to influence him in the performance
of any of his public or official duties, shall be guilty of bribery, and be punished
in such manner as shall be provided by law.®
The offence of corrupt solicitation of members of the general assembly, or of
public officers of the state, or of any municipal division thereof, and any occu-
pation or practice or solicitation of such members or officers, to influence their
mee action, shall be defined by law, and shall be punished by fine and imprison-
ment.
Any person may be compelled to testify, in any lawful investigation or judicial
proceeding, against any person who may be charged with having committed the
offence of bribery or corrupt solicitation, or practices of solicitation, and shall not
be permitted to withhold his testimony, upon the ground that it may criminate him-
self, or subject him to public infamy ; but such testimony shall not afterwards be
used against him, in any judicial proceeding, except for perjury in giving such
testimony ; and any person convicted of either of the offences aforesaid shall, as
part of the punishment therefor, be disqualified from holding any office or position
of honor, trust or profit in this commonwealth.
III. Act 31 Marcu 1860. Purd, 479,
Sxor. 48. If any person shall, directly or indirectly, or by means of and through
any artful and dishonest device whatever, give or offer to give any money, goods or
other present or reward, or give or make any promise, contract or agreement, for
the payment, delivery or alienation of any money, goods or other bribe, in order to
obtain or influence the vote, opinion, verdict, award, judgment, decree or behavior
of any member of the general assembly, or any officer of this commonwealth, judge,
Juror, justice, referee or arbitrator, in any bill, action, suit, complaint, indictment,
controversy, matter or thing whatsoever, depending or which shall depend before
him or them, such person shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and on conviction, be
5 1 Hawk. P. C0. 168, 3 Const. art. III. 2 30.
4 Const. art. IIL. 3 20, Seo 01 Penn. St.493, 4 Ibid Bar eo”
11 Luz. L. Reg. 25. 8 Thid. § 32,
BRIBERY. 943
sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars, and to undergo an
imprisonment by separate or solitary confinement at labor, not exceeding one year.
,And the member of assembly, or officer, judge, juror, justice, referee or arbitrator,
who shall accept or receive, or agree to accept or receive, such bribe, shall be guilty
of a misdemeanor, and on conviction, be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding one
thousand dollars, and to undergo an imprisonment, by separate or solitary confine-
ment at labor, not exceeding five years.
Sect. 49. No witness shall be excused from testifying in any criminal proceeding,
or in any investigation or inquiry before either branch of the general assembly, or
any cowmittee thereof, touching his knowledge of the aforesaid crimes, under any
pretence or allegation whatsoever ; .but the evidence so given, or the facts divulged
by him, shall not be used against him in any prosecution under this act: Provided,
That the accused shall not be convicted on the testimony of an accomplice, unless
the same be corroborated by other evidence, or the circumstances of the case.
Sect. 50. If any elector, authorized to vote at any public election, shall, directly
or indirectly, accept or receive, from any person, any gift or reward in money,
goods or other valuable thing, under an agreement or promise, express or implied,
that such elector shall give his vote for any particular candidate or candidates at
such election, or shall accept or receive the promise of any person that he shall
thereafter receive any gift or reward in money, goods or other valuable thing, any
office, appointment or employment, public or private, or any personal or pecuniary
advantage whatsoever, under such an agreement or promise, express or implied,
such elector shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and shall, on conviction of either of
the said offences, be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding one hundred dollars, and
undergo an imprisonment not exceeding six months.
Szcr. 51. Any person who shall, directly or indirectly, give, or offer to give, any
such gift or reward to any such elector, with the intent to induce him to vote for
any particular candidate or candidates at such election, or shall, directly or indirectly,
procure or agree to give any such gift or reward to such elector, with the intent
aforesaid, or shall, with the intent to influence or intimidate such elector to give his
vote for any particular candidate or candidates at such election, give, offer or promise
to give, such elector any office, place, appointment or employment, or threaten such
elector with dismissal or discharge from any office, place, appointment or employ-
ment, public or private, then held by him, in case of his refusal to vote for any
particular candidate or candidates at such election, the person so offending shall be
guilty of a misdemeanor, and, on conviction, be sentenced to pay a five not exceeding
five hundred dollars, and undergo an imprisonment not exceeding two years.
IV. Act 29 Aprit 1874. Purd. 480.
Sect. 1. Any person or persons who shall, directly or indirectly, by offer or pro-
mise of money, office, appointment, employment, testimonial, or other thing of value,
or who shall, by threats or intimidation, endeavor to influence any member of the
general assembly, state, county, election, municipal or other public officer, in
the discharge, performance or non-performance of any act, duty or obligation per-
taining to such office, shall be guilty of the offence of corrupt solicitation, and
liable to indictment for a misdemeanor ;! and on conviction thereof, shall be sen-
tenced to pay a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars, and to undergo imprisonment
not exceeding two years, at the discretion of the court. :
Secr. 2. Any occupation or practice of solicitation of members of either house
of the general assembly, or of public officers of the state, or of any municipal
division thereof, to influence their official action, shall be deemed a misdemeanor,
and any person convicted thereof shall be punished as provided by the preceding
section: Provided, That any open address upon or explanation of any measure or
question before either house of the general assembly, or any committee or member
thereof, or before any municipal counsel, or board or committee thereof, or before
any public officer, shall not be held to be solicitation, within the meaning of this
section."
1 See act 9 May 1889, as to bribery at elections, and 8 June 1881, aa to bribery at primary elec-
tions, Purd. 481.
[ 244]
Building Associations.
I, Nature of building associations. TIL. Judicial decisions.
II. Acts of assembly.
I. A Burnpina Assocrarion is a society, incorporated or otherwise, composed
entirely of one class of stockholders; and its assets or property is represented by
stock. Its original capital is derived from the monthly instalments or dues paid on
account of each share of stock by the holder thereof; which is generally one dollar
for each share of the ultimate par value of $200, or in that proportion. And the
chief sources of profit by means of which the association is enabled to work out
the ultimate value of the shares, in a given number of years, is obtained from
loaning the accumulated monthly instalments of dues and profits to such of the
stockholders only as may, under the rules, borrow the same.
A modification of this plan is of frequent occurrence, in the shape of serial asso-
ciations, that is, associations which, though their duration is limited, instead of
issuing all the stock, to the full extent allowed, at once, divide it up into series, and
issue them successively; each class or series being thus treated, to some extent, as
a separate association, distinct from the others, but with them sharing in the profits,
This is specially authorized by the act of 1874.
The act of 1874 provides for the incorporation of building and loan associations.!
And inasmuch as the statute confers no privileges on any associations except those
incorporated under its provisions, it is of the utmost importance that a charter
of incorporation should in all cases be applied for. It is well settled, that no unin-
corporated association can, in any court, recover more than the actual amount
loaned, with interest, and that the taking of premiums by such associations is
wholly illegal This caution is given, because in some cases, a few prominent
members, desirous of obtaining the entire control of’ the affairs of an association, as
trustees and officers, combine to prevent an application for a charter, and persuade
their less intelligent fellow-members that such an act is entirely unnecessary.
The act of 1879 has removed the disability of married women to become mem-
bers of a building association. And where a married woman had purchased stock
in, and obtained a loan from, a building association, prior to the passage of that
act, and subsequently continued to pay monthly premiums on the loan, it was held,
that she could not set up her previous disability.’ And prior to that act, a husband
who had joined with his wife in a bond and morteage to the association, and who
had received the full benefit of the loan, was held liable on his bond, though the
wife was not bound* The fact that the principal in a contract is not liable
thereon, by reason of her coverture, constitutes no defence, in an action against a
surety who has become such in view of the principal’s disability.8 The executor of
a deceased member is not ipso facto, a member of the association; but the estate in
her hands is bound by the obligations entered into by the decedent, and the executor
is entitled to the advantages conferred upon her testator by law.
The members consist of two descriptions of persons; the non-borrowing class,
composed of those who do not avail themselves of the privilege of borrowing in
advance the ultimate value of their shares, but continue paying their monthly dues,
until such time as from the earnings of the association they are entitled to receive
the par value of their shares in cash ; and the borrowing class, composed of those
who avail themselves, from time to time, of this privilege, and thus anticipate the
ultimate value of their stock, paying a premium for the present use of it, as well
; Purd. 269, : to building associations in the counties of Phila-
68 Penn. St. 67. 82 Ibid. 180. 89 Ibid. 15. delphia, Berks and Schuylkill (which has not been
35 Leg. Int. 395. 1 Del. Co. R. 98. expressly repealed), authorizes parents to sub-
: 103 Penn. St. 86. scribe for stock on behalf of their minor children.
: 9 Tbid. 118. And by various local acts, this provision was
100 Ibid. 155. extended to the counties of Allegheny, Bucks,
® Endlich on Building Associations 2 73-4. Carbon, Dauphin, Del i
1 i - phin, Delaware, Juniata, Lancaster,
The act 22 April 1850 (Pamph. 550), in reference Lehigh, Mifflin, Montgomery and Northampton.
BUILDING ASSOCIATIONS. 245
as legal interest, monthly, in addition to their regular monthly dues, until the
ultimate result is reached and the loan is paid and cancelled by the value of
the stock.
At each monthly meeting of the association, after the receipt of the monthly
dues, interest and fines, the amount on hand, subject to loan, is announced ; it is
then put up to competition, and awarded to the party who bids the hichest pre-
mium for the use of the money; for this he gives a mortgage on real estate to
secure the punctual payment of his dues and interest (and the principal also in
case of default), which mortgage is cancelled on the winding up of the association.
It will thus be seen, that the sources of profit consist of the premiums deducted
from the loans, when made; the monthly interest paid ; besides fines charged upon
dues and interest, when in arrear, and the profit on withdrawals of stock before
the ultimate result is reached. These, with the payment of the monthly dues,
constitute the income of the association ; and it is easily perceived, that by the
monthly compounding of interest upon these items, the profits are largely increased ;
so that the ultimate par value of the stock will generally be reached, and the asso-
ciation wound up, in from eight to ten years, according to the amount of the
premiums given for the anticipated loan thereof. The time must necessarily be
longer when the current rate of interest is so low as to offer no inducement to bor-
rowing members,
The powers granted to such associations are not discounting privileges within the
constitutional prohibition. By act 26th April 1855, the shares held by members
are to be deemed personal property. They are exempted from taxation for state
purposes on their capital stock or mortgages, and other securities for money loaned
to their members.’ Nor are they subject to the provisions of the act of 1891, relating
to the tax on capital stock.* Nor to the act relating to the registry of corporations.
And in Philadelphia they may bring and maintain suits, and carry on those already
brought in their corporate names, on all judgments, bonds, mortgages, notes,
or other evidences of debt or obligations due them, or for monthly dues, interest, or
any demand owing to them, and proceed to judgment and execution, notwithstand-
ing their charter may have expired; and the officers last elected, or the survivors
of them, are the officers to represent said corporations, for such purpose; and
if no officer survive, the stockholders may elect others under their by-laws.® They
may enforce a covenant in the mortgage of a borrowing member for the payment of
taxes on the mortgaged premises.’
II. Act oF 20 Aprit 1874. Purd. 269.
Szcr. 27. Building and loan associations incorporated under the provisions of
this act, shall have the powers, and from the date of the letters-patent creating the
same, when not otherwise provided in this act, be governed, managed and con-
trolled as follows :* ;
(1.) They shall have the power and franchise of loaning or advancing to the
stockholders thereof the moneys accumulated, from time to time, and the power
and right to secure the repayment of such moneys, and the performance of the
other conditions upon which the loans are to be made, by bond and mortgage
or other security, as well as the power and right to purchase or erect houses,
and to sell, convey, lease or mortgage the same at pleasure to their stockholders,
or others for the benefit of their stockholders, in such manner also that the
premiums taken by the said associations, for the preference or priority of such
loans, shall not be deemed usurious; and so also that in case of non-payment of
instalments, premiums or interest by borrowing stockholders, for six months,
payment of principal, premiums and interest, without deducting the premiums
paid, or interest thereon, may be enforced by proceeding on their securities
according to law.
135 Penn. St. 223, 225. 714 W.N. C. 344.
a h. 329, 8 The act 11 May 1874, Pamph. 133, cured
5 viet May 1883. Purd. 272. defects in the organization of existing building
4 Purd. 1964. associations. 89 Penn, St. 428. 2 Pears. 348,
5 Ibid. 272. See 42 Leg. Int. 501.
6 Act 26 April 1869. Purd. 273.
246 BUILDING ASSOCIATIONS.
(2.) The capital stock of any corporation created for such purposes, by virtue
of this act, shall at no time consist in the aggregate of more than one million dol-
lars, to be divided into shares of such denomination, not exceeding five hundred
dollars each, aud in such number as the corporators may, in the application for
their charter specify: Provided, That the capital stock may be issued in series ;
but no such series shall at any issue exceed in the aggregate five hundred thou-
.sand dollars, the instalments on which stock are to be paid at such time and place
as the by-laws shall appoint; no periodical payment of such instalments to be
made exceeding two dollars on each share, and said stock may be paid off and
retired as the by-laws shall direct; every share of stock shall be subject to a lien
for the payment of unpaid instalments, and other charges incurred thereon, under
the provisions of the charter and by-laws, and the by-laws may prescribe the form
and manner of enforcing such lien; new shares of stock may be issued in lieu of
the shares withdrawn or forfeited; the stock may be issued in one or in suc.
cessive series, in such amount as the board of directors or the stockholders may
determine ; and any stockholder wishing to withdraw from the said corporation,
shall have power to do so, by giving thirty days’ notice of his or her intention to
withdraw, when he or she shall be entitled to receive the amount paid in by him
or her, less all fines and other charges; but after the expiration of one year from
the issuing of the series, such stockholder shall be entitled, in addition thereto,
to legal interest thereon: Provided, That at no time shall more than one-half of
the funds in the treasury of the corporation be applicable to the demands of with-
drawing stockholders, without the consent of the board of directors, and that no
stockholder shall be entitled to withdraw, whose stock is held in pledge for security.
Upon the death of a stockholder, his or her legal representatives shall be entitled
to receive the full amount paid in by him or her, and legal interest thereon, first
deducting all charges that may be due on the stock ; no fines shall be charged to a
deceased member’s account, from and after his or her decease, unless his legal rep-
resentatives of such decedent assume the future payments on the stock.
(3:) The number, titles, functions and compensation of the officers of any such
corporation, their terms of office, the times of their elections, as well as the
qualifications of electors, and the ratio and manner of voting, and the periodical
meetings of the said corporation, shall be determined by the by-laws, when not
provided by this act.
(4.) The said officers shall hold stated meetings, at which the money in the
treasury, if over the amount fixed by charter as the full value of a share, shall
be offered for a loan, in open meeting, and the stockholder who shall bid the highest
premium for the preference or priority of loan, shall be entitled to receive a loan
of not wore than the amount fixed by charter as the full value of a share, for
each share of stock held by such stockholder: Provided, That a stockholder may
borrow such fractional part of the amount fixed by charter as the full value of a
share, as the by-laws may provide; good and ample security, as prescribed by the
by-laws of the corporation, shall be given by the borrower, to secure the repay-
ment of the loan; in case the borrower shall neglect to offer security, or shall
offer security that is not approved by the board of directors, by such time as the
by-laws may prescribe, he or she shall be charged with legal interest, together
with any expenses incurred, and the loss in premium, if any, on a resale, and
the money may be resold at the next stated meeting; in case of non-payment of
instalments or interest by borrowing stockholders for the space of six mouths,
payment of principal and interest, without deducting the premium paid or interest
thereon, may be enforced, by proceeding on their securities according to law.
(6.) No premiuus, fines or interest on such premiums, that may accrue to the
said corporation, accordiug to the provisions of this act, shall be deemed usurious ;
and the same may be collected as debts of like amount are now by law collected in
this commonwealth.
(7.) No corporation or association created under this act shall cease or expire,
from neglect on the part of the corporators to elect officers at the time mentioned in
their charter or by-laws ; and all officers elected by such corporation shall hold their
offices until their successors are duly elected.
(8.) Avy loan or building association incorporated by or under this act, is hereby
BUILDING ASSOUIATIONS. 247
authorized and empowered to purchase, at any sheriff’s or other judicial sale, or at
any other sale, public or private, any real estate, upon which such association may
have or hold any mortgage, judgment, lien or other incumbrance, or ground-rent,
or in which said association may have an interest; and the real estate so purchased,
or any other that such association may hold or be entitled to, at the passage of this
act, to sell, convey, lease or mortgage, at pleasure, to any person or persons whatso-
ever ; and all sales of real estate heretofore made by such associations to any person.
an not members of the association so selling, are hereby confirmed and made
valid.
(9.) All such corporations shall have full power to purchase lands and to sell
and convey the same, or any part thereof, to their stockholders or others, in fee-
simple, with or without the reservation of ground-rents, but the quantity of land
purchased by any one of said associations hereafter incorporated, shall not, in the
whole, exceed fifty acres; and in all cases the lands shall be disposed of within ten
years from the date of the incorporation of such associations respectively,
(10.) All land and building associations are hereby authorized to make sale of,
and assign or extinguish, to any person or persons, the ground-rents created as
aforesaid.
Act oF 10 Aprin 1879. Purd. 271.
Sxcr. 1. It shall be lawful for any mutual savings-fund, or building and loan
association, now incorporated or hereafter to be incorporated, in addition to dues
and interest, to charge and receive the premium or bonus bid by a stockholder for.
preference or priority of right to a loan, in periodical instalments: and such pre-
mium or bonus so paid in instalments shall not be deemed usurious, but shall be
taken to be a payment as it falls due, in contradistinction to a premium charged and
paid in advance; and in so far as said premium or bonus, so charged and paid, in
addition to dues and interest, shall be in excess of two dollars for each periodical
payment, the same shall be lawful, any law, usage or custom to the contrary not-
withstanding. It shall also be lawful for any mutual savings-fund or building and
loan association to charge and deduct interest in advance, in lieu of premiums for
preference or priority of right to a loan: Provided, That the certificate of
incorporation of each association hereafter to be incorporated, and the certificate
provided in section nine of this act, for those heretofore incorporated, shall set forth
whether the premium or bonus bid for the prior right to a loan shall be deducted
therefrom in advance, or paid in periodical instalments, or whether interest in
advance shall be deducted from the loan in lieu of premium or bonus.
Sxct. 2. Stockholders withdrawing voluntarily, shall receive such proportion of
the profits of the association, or such rate of interest as may be prescribed by the by-
laws, any law or usage to the contrary notwithstanding ;' but payment of the
value of stock so withdrawn shall only be due, when the funds now by law appli-
cable to the demand of withdrawing stockholders are sufficient to meet and liquidate
the same, and then only in the order of the respective times of presentation of the
notices of such withdrawals, which must have been presented in writing at a
previous stated meeting, and have been then and there indorsed as to times of
presentation, by the officer designated by the by-laws of the association.
Sxcr. 3. The by-laws may provide for the involuntary withdrawal and cancella-
tion, at or before maturity, of shares of stock not borrowed on: Provided, That
such withdrawal and cancellation shall be pro rata among the shares of the same
series of stock: And provided further, That not less than legal interest shall be
credited and allowed to each share so withdrawn and cancelled.
Szcr. 4. A borrower may repay a loan at any time, and in case of the re-payment
thereof, before the maturity of the shares pledged for said loan, there shall be
refunded to such borrower (if the premiums, bonus or interest shall have been
deducted in advance) such proportions of the premiums, bonus or advance interest
bid, as the by-laws may determine: Provided, That in no case shall the association
retain more than one one-hundredth of said premiums or bonus for each calendar
month that has expired since the date of the meeting upon which the loan was
made, or if interest in advance, it shall retain only the interest due on the loan up
to the time of settlement: And further provided, That such borrower shall receive
1 See 16 W. N. C. 365.
248 BUILDING ASSOCIATIONS.
the withd ‘awing value of the shares pledged for said loan, and the shares shall
revert back to the association.
Secor. 5. In case of non-payment of instalments of stock, premiums, dues or
interest, by borrowing stockholders, for the space of six months, payment of the
same, together with the full principal of the loan, may be enforced by proceeding
on their securities, according to law; and the moneys so recovered shall be paid into
the treasury of the association for such uses (loans or otherwise) as may be deemed
proper by the association; and if the said moneys so recovered, together with the
withdrawal value of the shares of such defaulting borrower, shall exceed the amount
it would have required, according to the preceding section, to have voluntarily
repaid the loan, together with all the expenses incurred by the association, such
excess shall be repaid to such defaulting borrower.
Szcr. 6. Fines or penalties for the non-payment of instalments of dues, interest
and bonus or premium, shall not exceed two per centum per month on all arrear-
ages.
* Sno 7. It shall be lawful for any married woman of full age to hold stock in any
of said saving-funds, building or loan associations; and as such stockholder, she
shall have all the rights and privileges of other members, including the right to
borrow money from said associations and bid premiums therefor, and shall also
have the right and power to secure such loan by transferring ber said stock or
other securities to said association from which the same was borrowed, or by exe-
cuting bond and mortgage upon her separate real estate to secure said loan:
Provided, however, That the husband of such married woman join in the execu-
tion of such bond and mortgage. And such married woman shall also have the
right to sell, assign and transfer the said stock, or withdraw the same, without
joining the husband in such transfer or withdrawal; and it shall be lawful for
any such savings-fund, building or loan association to collect such loan made to
such married woman, including the dues, interest, premium and fines, as loans
made by such associations to other members are now by law collected; and such
stock, or interest in such stock, shall not be liable for the debts of any husband
of such married woman.)
Act oF 17 APRIL 1876. Purd. 272.
Sxct. 1. All deeds of conveyance of lands situate within this ecemmonwealth, made
by any savings-fund, building or loan association, after the term for which it was in-
corporated shall have expired, shall be as good and effectual, and have the same force
and effect for passing title to the lands so conveyed, as though executed during the
period of its chartered existence.
Act oF 17 JUNE 1878. Purd. 272.
Szct. 1. All purchases of land heretofore made by building and loan associations,
incorporated by virtue of any law of this commonwealth, and also all sales of the same,
made by them, to their stockholders or others, are hereby confirmed ; and the titles of
said associations and their vendees are hereby declared good and valid, to all intents
and purposes; and the said associations, their successors or assigns, may sell, convey
or lease, at pleasure, at any time within five years from the passage of this act, the
undisposed-of portions of the real estate so hereto purchased.
Act or 22 May 1883. Puard. 272.
Secr. 1. Mutual loan and building associations shall be exempt from the pro-
visions of each and every law imposing taxes for state purposes on their capital
stock or mortgages, and other securities for money loaned to their own members ;
but the real estate owned by said association shall be subject to the same rates of
taxation as the real estate of other corporations and persons: Provided, how-
ever, oe the right of the commonwealth to collect taxes already accrued is hereby
reserved.
1The 9th section provides for existing associations entitling themselves to the benefits of the
statute. Purd. 272.
BUILDING ASSOCIATIONS. 249
Act oF 18 Fesruary 1869. Purd. 272.
Sect. 1. On the petition of any twelve or more citizens of Pennsylvania, the
court of common pleas of the county of Philadelphia shall have all powers con-
ferred by the acts relating to loan and building associations, to incorporate them
and their associates as a perpetual corporation, for the purposes following, to wit:
to purchase, hold and build upon and sell in fee-simple, houses and lots in the city
of Philadelphia, and also to make loans on bonds and mortgages to others to build
and improve, and the same to sell and assign, and to borrow moneys upon bonds and
mortgages or otherwise for said purposes; and in making sales, or leases, or loans
on mortgages, it shall be lawful for such corporation and borrowers of them to
agree upon, and insert in the deeds of conveyance, a condition against the use
of any granted or leased premises for the sale of any intoxicating liquors, or
unlawful immoral purposes, the carrying on any noxious or unhealthful business,
with right of re-entry for breach of such condition: Provided, That no corporation,
chartered under this act, shall have a greater capital than one-half million of dol-
lars, and shall stipulate by their articles to devote their capital to improve or
promote the improvement of parts of said city most needivg physical, healthful and
moral reform, which shall be defined and prescribed in the charter, and not exceed
eight main squares, and shall apply all their profits over their expenses, and a
return of eight per centum per annum, to the shareholders to and for the construc-
tion of substantial stone, or brick, or iron habitations, for homes for respectable
persons of limited means, either as lessees or purchasers: And provided, That the
said court shall be satisfied of the benevolent purposes of the petitioners ; and that
the legislature may, at any time, repeal, this act, and such charters, if the powers
hereby granted should be found prejudicial to thé community, but in manner to do
no injustice to the corporators.
Act oF 26 Aprrt 1869, Purd. 273.
Sxer. 1. All building, saving and loan associations may bring and maintain suits,
and carry on those already brought, in their corporate names, on all judgments,
bonds, mortgages, notes or other evidences of debt or obligations due them, or for
monthly dues, interest or any demand owing to them, and proceed to judgment and
execution, notwithstanding their charter may have expired ; and the officers last
elected, or the survivors of them, shall be the officers to represent said corporations
for such purpose; and if no officer survive, the stockholders may elect others under
their by-laws.
Sxot. 2. This act shall only be construed so as to enable said associations to
collect up and divide their assets and wind up their affairs, and not to allow them
to transact new business: Provided, That this act shall only apply to the city of
Philadelphia.
III. A building association must loan its surplus funds in the mode prescribed by
the statute; it has no right to fix a minimum rate of premium? But a loan,
not made in pursuance of such invalid by-law, nor affected thereby, is binding on
the borrower.’ It cannot, by a by-law compel its stockholders to offer a premium
for priority of payment, after its shares have become worth par.* Asswmpsit will lie
to recover the monthly dues.5 They constitute separate debts to the association
with reference to the question whether he is six months in arrear.6 A member is
deemed six months in arrear, notwithstanding a partial payment of dues in the first
of the six months.”
The position of a borrowing member who has received the par value of his stock
and given bond to secure payment of his future dues is not a settled question in
this state It is decided, that stock payments are not ipso facto an extinguishment
1 Such sci. fa. may issue, though the land is 8 See 42 Leg. Int. 217, for an able article on
situate in another county. 100 Penn. St. 402. this subject, in which the writer takes the position
2 95 Penn. St. 122. that every subsequent stock payment is a reduc-
8 9W.N. C. 251. tion of the debt secured by the mortgage; though
4 7 Ibid. 95. See 2 Law Times (N. 8.) 17. he admits that a purchaser at sheriff’s sale of
5 7 Leg. & Ins. Rep. 31. the mortgaged premises cannot claim to have the
6 12 W.N. C. 222. stock payments so applied for his bevefit. On
7 4 Leg. Gaz. 388. this question, see 17 N. J. (Eq.) 497.
250 BUILDING ASSOCIATIONS.
of so much of the mortgage debt, though the mortgagor may so treat them, at his
option, in a suit upon the mortgage! But a purchaser at sheriff's sale of the mem-
ber’s interest on the mortgaged premises, under a junior incumbrance, is not entitled
to a credit for stock payments made by the mortgagor.? So. where a building
association mortgage is divested by an orphans’ court sale for the payment of debts,
the association can only claim the same amount as if the. borrower had elected to
pay off the loan® And in an action against a defaulting borrower, upon a judg-
ment note given to secure the loan, the.defendant is only entitled to a credit for the
actual amount paid upon his stock (pledged as collateral security), not to the value
of the stock, at the time of trial Where the mortgage does not secure the fines,
they cannot be charged on the land®
A stockholder, who gives notice of withdrawal, thereby becomes a creditor to the
amount of his legal claim, and is entitled to recover as such® But the association
has a right to retain from a withdrawing stockholder, a proportion of the probable
loss sustained by reason of the purchase of real estate sold on its mortgage, which
has depreciated in value, even before the loss has been finally determined by a sale.’
A resolution permitting borrowers to withdraw, on certain terms, the stock to be
‘ cancelled,” when acted on by a member, is conclusive upon the assuciation.. Such
resolution cannot be rescinded to the prejudice of a member, who has made appli-
cation to withdraw, and refrained from paying his monthly dues, under the belief
that his application has been accepted.® There can be no withdrawal after the stock
has reached par.”
Though a member repay a sum borrowed, with lawful interest, his mortgage
remains as a security for his monthly dues ;" and for his liability to contribution for
its necessary expenses,”
A stockholder is not entitled to judgment against the association, for the value
of his shares, merely on the report of auditors that they are worth par.” To recover
the value of paid-up shares, the stockholder must proceed by bill in equity; he
cannot sue the association at law.™
In winding up the affairs of an insolvent building association, after deducting
the expenses of the administration of the assets, general creditors are first to be
paid in full, and the balance of the fund is to be distributed pro rata among those
whose claims are based upon the stock of the corporation, whether they have with-
drawn and hold orders for the withdrawal value or not; iv marshalling the assets,
neither class is to be preferred over the other.® So, the holders of matured stock
are not creditors, and can only share pro rata with the holders of uomatured
stock, after payment of the stock of the corporation.’® Where the association is
authorized by its charter to receive money on deposit, from its stockholders, to bear
interest, in case of insolvency, such stockholders are creditors as to their deposits
and are entitled to share pro rata with other outside creditors in preference to
stockholders; so where money has been received from persons who were net stock-
holders, though the association had no authority to receive such deposits.” It seems,
however, that withdrawing stockholders should not be required to share losses
resulting from bad investments, made after they withdrew. The fact that an
association has made an assignment for the benefit of creditors, does not prevent the
recovery of a judgment against it'® The treasurer is entitled to claim as a general
creditor for moneys paid by him on orders drawn before the assignment, in prefer:
ence to the claims of withdrawing stockholders.”
1 35 Penn. St. 463. 10 106 Penn. St. 334.
2 46 Ibid. 473. 93 Ibid. 258. 7 Phila, 189. 14 47 Penn, St. 352. 5 Phila. 62.
83 Leg. Int. 329. 6 W. N.C. 267. 2 Kulp 210. 12 44 Penn. St. 383,
8 34 Leg. Int. 49. 13 6 W. N.C. 330. Seo Ibid. 349.
497 Penn. St. 514. 2 Kulp 19. 14 8 Ibid. 176: s. oc. 93 Penn. St. 308.
5 41 Leg. Int. 16, Tho surety of a borrowing 15 102 Penn. St. 184. And sco 9 W. N. 0. 7%
member is liable to the same extent as his prin- 16 100 Penn. St. 493.
cipal. 8 Luz, L. Reg. 199. 1 Thid.
6 85 Penn. St. 304. 12 W. N. 0. 207. 18 102 Ibid. 184.
7 25 Pitts. L. J. 39. Ibid. 40. 0 6W. N.C. 176.
8 50 Penn. St. 32. 30 102 Penn. St. 184,
9 17 Leg. Int. 148,
[ 251 ]
Buoys and Beacons,
Act or 13 May 1879. Purd. 1602.
Sror. 1. Any person or persons who shall moor any vessel or vessels, of any kind
or name whatsoever, or any raft or any part of a raft, to any buoy, beacon or day-
mark, placed in the waters of Pennsylvania, by the authority of the United States
light-house board, or shall in any manner hang on with any vessel, or raft or part
of a raft, to any such buoy, beacon or day-mark, or shall wilfully remove, damage
-or destroy any such buoy, beacon or day-mark, or shall cut down, remove, damage or
destroy any beacon or beacons, erected on land in this state, by the authority of
the said United States light-house board, or having through unavoidable accident
run down, dragged from its position, or in any way injured any buoy, beacon or
day-mark as aforesaid, and shall fail to give notice, as soon as practicable, of having
done so, to the light-house inspector of the district in which said buoy, beacon or
day-mark may be located, or to the board of wardens for the port of Philadelphia,
shall, for every every such offence, be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon
conviction thereof before any court of competent jurisdiction, shall be punished by
a fine not to exceed two hundred dollars, or by imprisonment not to exceed three
months, or both, at the discretion of the court; one-third of the fine in each case
shall be paid to the informer, and two-thirds thereof to the light-house board, ta,
be used in repairing the said buoys or beacons.
Suor. 2. It shall be unlawful for any vessel to anchor on the range line of any
range lights established by the United States light-house board in this state; and
the master of any vessel so anchoring shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor,
and upon conviction thereof, before any court of competent jurisdiction, shall be
punished by a fine not to exceed fifty dollars; one-half the fine in each case to be
paid to the informer and one-half to the state.
Scr. 3. The cost of repairing or replacing any such buoy, beacon or day-mark,
which may have been misplaced, damaged or destroyed by any vessel or raft what-
soever, having been made fast to any such buoy, beacon or day-mark, shall, when
the same shall be legally ascertained, be a lien upon such vessel or raft, and may
be recovered against said vessel or raft, and the owner or owners thereof, in an
action of debt, in any court of competent jurisdiction in this state.
Burglary.
I. Provisions of the Penal Code. III. Warrant for a burglar.
II. Judicial decisions relating to burglary.
I. Acr 31 Marcon 1860. Purd. 482.
Scr. 135. If any person shall, by night, wilfully and maliciously break or enter
into the state capitol, or other public building belonging to the commonwealth, or
to any city or county thereof, or to any body corporate, society or association, or into
any church, meeting-house or dwelling-house, or out-house, parcel of said dwelling-
house, with an intent to kill, rob, steal or commit a rape, or any felony whatever,
whether the felonious intent be executed or not, the person so offending shall, on
conviction, be adjudged guilty of felonious burglary, and be sentenced to pay @ fine
not exceeding one thousand dollars, and to undergo an imprisonment, by separate or
solitary confinement at labor, not exceeding ten years. .
Seor. 186. If any person shall, in the day-time, break and enter any dwelling-
house, shop, warehouse, store, mill, barn, stable, out-house, or other building, or
wilfully and maliciously, either by day or by night, without breaking, enter the same
with intent to commit any felony whatever therein, the person so offending shall be
guilty of felony, and, on conviction, be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding five
252 BURGLARY.
hundred dollars, and to undergo an imprisonment, by separate or solitary confine-
ment at labor, not exceeding four years.!
The 179th section provides that on all convictions for burglary, &c., the defendant
shall, in addition to the punishment prescribed for such offence, be adjudged to
restore to the owner the property taken, or to pay the value of the same, or so much
thereof’ as may not be restored: Provided, That the party to whom restitution is to
be awarded shall not be thereby rendered incompetent as a witness on the trial of
the offender.
II. There must be both a breaking and an entry to complete this offence.* The
following acts amount to an actual breaking, viz.: opening the casement, or
breaking the glass window, picking open the lock of a door, or putting back the
lock on the leaf of a window, or unlatching the door that is only latched.? But if
a man leaves his doors or windows open, it is his own folly and negligence ; and if a
man enters therein, it is no burglary; yet if he afterwards unlock an inner, or
chamber door, it is sot But to come down a chimney is held a burglarious entry ;
for that is as much closed as the nature of things will permit. So also, to knock
at a door, and upon opening it to rush in with a felonious intent; or, under the
pretence of taking lodgings, to fall upon the landlord and rob him, these acts have
been adjudged burglarious, though there was no actual breaking; for the law will
not suffer itself to be thus trifled with.® Obtaining an entrance into a dwelling-
house, by fraud or artifice, with intent to commit a felony, is a constructive breaking.?
And so, if a servant opens and enters his master’s chamber-door with a felonious
-design ; or if any other person lodging in the same house, or in a public inn, opens
and enters another’s door with such evil intent, itis burglary. Nay, if a servant
conspires with a robber, and lets him into the house by night, this is burglary in
both.®
As for the entry, any, the least degree of it, with any part of the body, or with
an instrument held in the hand, is sufficient ; as to step over the threshold, to put
a hand or a hook in at a window to draw out goods, or a pistol to demand one’s
money, are all of them burglarious entries.®
Burglary may be committed in a house in the city, in which the prosecutor
intended to reside on his return from his summer residence in the country, and to
which, on going into the country, he had removed his furniture from his former
residence in town, though neither the prosecutor nor his family had ever lodged in
the house in which the crime is charged to have been committed, but merely visited
it occasionally.”
If there be daylight or twilight enough, begun or left, whereby the countenance
of a person may be reasonably discerned, a breaking and entry is not burglary, by
the common law.”
To constitute the crime of burglary there must be an intent to commit a felony ;
therefore, a breaking and entering a dwelling-house, in the night-time, with intent
to commit adultery, is not burglary.”
The general rule is, that if an out-house be so near the dwelling-house that it is
used with the dwelling-house as appurtenant to it, though not within the same
inclosure, burglary may be committed in it. But if there be no common entrance,
and the buildings be distinct, the offence does not exist. Breaking and entering
a store-house, not parcel of a dwelling-house, is not burglary at common law, nor
under the Pennsylvania statute."
The 136th section of the criminal code applies to cases partaking of the nature of
burglary, when the breaking is in the day-time.
aes Re-enacted -by act 22 April 1863 2 2. Purd. 8 4 Bl. Com. 177.
2. ® Ibid. But to break out is not burglary. 82
41 Hawk. P. 0. 130, Penn. St. 306,
3 1 Halo H. P. C. 0. 38. 10 3. R. 207. And see 6 Phila. 305,
4 Bl. Com. 176, M7 Dane’s Abr. 139.
Ibid. 12 16 Vt. 551,
6 Tbid. 177. 18 Whart. Cr. L. 3 1561.
3 82 Penn, St. 306. 85 Ibid. 66. And see 1 60 Penn. St. 103. And see 3 Brewst, 340.
bid. 64. 16 60 Penn. St. 103.
BURIAL GROUNDS. 2538
III. A WARRANT TO APPREHEND A BURGLAR.
BuRKS COUNTY, ss.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To the Constable of the township of L—, in the county of Berks, greeting :
_ Wuereas, J. L., of the township of L , in the county of Berks, hath this day made
information, upon oath, before J. R., one of our justices of the peace in and for the said
county, that yesterday, in the night, the dwelling-house of him, the said J. L., at L——
township aforesaid, was feloniously and burglariously broken open and entered, and one
silver coffee-pot, of the value of forty dollars,! of the goods and chattels of him the said
J. L., feloniously and burglariously stolen, taken and carried away fram thence, and that
he hath just cause to suspect, and doth suspect, that G. B., of the same township, weaver,
the said felony and burglary did commit. ‘These are, therefore, to command you forth-
with to take the said G. B., and bring him before the said J. R., to answer the said
complaint, and further to be dealt with according to law. Witness the said J. R., at
L—— township aforesaid, the second day of September, in the year of our Lord one
thousand eight hundred and eighty. J. R., Justice of the Peace. [SEAL]
Burial Grounds,
Act 31 Marca 1860. Purd. 277.
Sect. 47. Any person who shall wilfully and maliciously destroy, mutilate, deface,
injure or remove any tomb, monument, gravestone or other edifice, placed in any
cemetery or grave-yard appropriated to and used for the interment of human beings,
in this commonwealth ; or shall wilfully and maliciously injure, destroy or remove
any fence, railing or other work for the protection or ornament of such places of
interment ; or shall wilfully open any tomb, vault or grave, within the same, und
clandestinely remove any body or remains therefrom ;? or maliciously destroy any
tree or shrubbery growing in such cémetery or graveyard ; shall be guilty of a
misdemeanor, and on conviction of either of the said offences, be sentenced to
undergo an imprisonment not exceeding one year, or to pay a fine not exceeding
one hundred dollars, or both, or either, at the discretion of the court.
Act 19 May 1879. Purd. 482.
Szcr. 1. Any person or persons who shall, wilfully and maliciously, destroy,
mutilate, injure, pluck off, deface or remove therefrom, any tree or trees, vines,
flowers, grass or ornamental shrubbery, growing, being or temporarily placed therein,
for ornamental or useful purposes, in any cemetery or grave-yard in this common-
wealth, used for the interment of human beings, or shall wilfully trespass in and
upon private inclosures in any cemetery or grave-yard aforesaid, shall be guilty of
a misdemeanor, and on conviction of any said offences, be sentenced to undergo an
imprisonment, not exceeding one year, or to pay a fine of not exceeding one hundred
dollars ($100), or both, or either, at the direction of the court.
1 Tf the offence be burglary alone, unattended with larceny, the warrant may be varied accord.
ingly. 2 See 33 Am. L. Reg. 506.
[ 254 ]
Butter and Cheese.
Act oF 21 May 1885. Purd. 1621.
1. No person, firm or corporate body shall manufacture out of any oleaginous sub-
stance or any compound of the same, other than that produced from unadulterated milk,
or of cream from the same, any article designed to take the place of butter or cheese
produced from pure, unadulterated milk, or cream from the same, or of any imitation
or adulterated butter or cheese, nor shall sell or offer for sale, or have in his, her or
their possession, with intent to sell the same as an article of food.
2. Every sale of such article or substance, which is prohibited by the first section
of this act, made after this act shall take effect, is hereby declared to be unlawful and
void, and no action shall be maintained in any of the courts of this state to recover
upon any contract for the sale of any such article or substance.
3. Every person, company, firm or corporate body who shall manufacture, sell or
offer or expose for sale, or have in his, her or their possession, with intent to sell, any
substance, the manufacture and sale of which is prohibited by the first section of this
act, shall, for every such offence, forfeit and pay the sum of one hundred dollars, which
shall be recoverable with costs by any person suing in the name of the commonwealth,
as debts of like amount are by law recoverable; one-half of which sum, when so re-
covered, shall be paid to the proper county treasurer for the use of the county in
which suit is brought, and the other half to the person or persons at whose instance
such a suit shall or may be commenced and prosecuted to recovery.
4. Every person who violates the provisions of the first section of this act, shall be
deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction, shall be punished by a fine of
not less than one hundred dollars nor more than three hundred, or by imprisonment in
the county jail for not less than ten nor more than thirty days, or both such fine and
imprisonment for the first offence, and imprisonment for one year for every subse-
quent offence.
5. It shall be the duty of constables of the several: cities, boroughs, wards and
townships of this commonwealth, to make quarterly reports, under oath, to the courts
of quarter sessions, of all violations of any of the provisions of this act which may
come or be brought to their notice ; and it shall be the duty of the judges of the said
courts to see that the said returns are made regularly and faithfully.
. Act oF 23 May 1893. Purd. 1622.
1. It shall not be lawful for any charitable or penal institution in the state of Penn-
sylvania to use, or furnish to its inmates, any substance, the manufacture or sale of
which is prohibited by section one of the act, entitled ‘‘ An act for the protection of
the public health and to prevent adulteration of dairy products and fraud in the sale
thereof,” approved May twenty-first, Anno Domini one thousand eight hundred and
eighty-five. ‘
2. Any officer, agent, steward or other official of any such charitable or penal insti-
tution, who shall knowingly buy any substance the manufacture or sale of which is
prohibited by section one of the said act of May twenty-one, Anno Domini one thou-
sand eight hundred and eighty-five, for use in such charitable or penal institution, or
who shall knowingly cause such substance to be used by the inmates of such charita-
ble or penal institution, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon convic-
tion shall be punished by a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars, or imprisonment
not exceeding two years for each offence, or either or both, at the discretion of the
court.
3. Every person who shall knowingly sell or offer for sale, to any officer, agent,
steward or other official of any charitable or penal institution, any substance, the
manufacture or sale of which is prohibited by section one of the said act of May
twenty-first, Anno Domini one thousand eight hundred and eight-five, for use in such
charitable or penal institution, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon
conviction shall be punished by a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars, or by im--
prisonment not exceeding two years, or either or both, at the discretion of the court.
CATTLE. 255
Act oF 10 Junz 1881. Purd. 1332.
Sror. 1. If any person or persons shall, with intent to defraud, sell, supply or bring
to be manufactured, to any butter or cheese manufactory in this state, any milk,
diluted with water, or in any way adulterated, uncleanly or impure, or milk from
which cream has been taken, or milk commonly known as skimmed milk, or if any
person or persons so furnishing milk as aforesaid, who shall keep back any part of the
milk known as “‘strippings,’’ or shall knowingly bring or supply milk to any butter or
cheese manufactory, that is tainted or partially sour, or shall knowingly bring or
supply to any butter or cheese manufactory, milk drawn from cows, within fifteen
days before parturition, or within five days after parturition, shall for each offence
forfeit and pay a sum not less than ten dollars nor more than one hundred dollars,
with costs of suit ; to be sued for in any court of competent jurisdiction, for the benefit
of the person or persons, firm or association or corporation upon whom such fraud or
neglect shall be committed.
The act 21 May 1885 is constitutional. It does not apply to one who receives oleo-
margarine from another state and sells it in its original package.! Where oleomargarine
was brought into this state in a package containing ten pounds and out of this package
two pounds were sold, it was held that there was a breaking of the original package.”
A person who sells oleomargarine is liable for the penalty although he sells it in
ignorance of its real nature.* The selling of oleomargarine, the having it in posses-
sion and the exposing it for sale on the same day are not separate offences and the
penalties cannot be multiplied. Where, however, the double penalty imposed is less
than the maximum fine for the one offence, the supreme court will not reverse.*
To sustain a conviction under this act, it must affirmatively appear that the oleomar-
garine was sold by the defendant as an article of food. An action lies in this state
for the price of oleomargarine sold in another state and delivered here.® This act sup-
plies the act 24 May 1883, P. L. 43. Where the case stated averred that the de-
fendant was an agent of a non-resident manufacturer and that he sold at his store in
this state, a package of oleomargarine weighing eighty pounds made and stamped and
branded in Rhode Island for use as an article of food, it was held that this statement
did not amount to an assertion that the sales were made in the original package of
commerce.’
Cattle.
Act oF 12 Aprin 1866. Purd. 292.
Sect. 1. It shall not be lawful for any person who may own any cattle or sheep,
affected by the disease known as the pleuro-pneumonia, or other contagious or infec-
tious disease, to sell or otherwise dispose of any cattle, either alive or slaughtered,
from the premises where such disease is known to exist, nor for a period of two months
after such disease shall have disappeared from such premises.
Sect. 2. No cattle or sheep shall be allowed to run at large in any township or
borough where any contagious disease prevails; and the constables of such townships
are hereby authorized and required to take up and confine any cattle so found running
at large, until called for, and until all costs are paid; and in townships where there
are no constables, it shall be the duty of the township clerk to perform this service ;
and the sad officer shall be entitled to receive one dollar for each head of cattle so
taken up; and any officer who shall refuse to perform the duties of this act shall be
liable to a fine of ten dollars.
Srcr. 3. Any person offending against the provisions of the first section of this act
shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction, be sentenced to pay a fine not
exceeding five hundred dollars, or undergo an imprisonment not exceeding six months.
Act or 1 May 1879. Purd. 292.
Sct. 1. Whenever it shall be brought to the notice of the governor of this state,
that the disease known as contagious or infectious pleuro-pneumonia exists among the
cattle in any of the counties in this state, it shall be his duty to take measures to
promptly.suppress the disease and prevent it from spreading.
111 Atl. 623. 114 P.8. 265. 48 L. 1.4. 5153 P. S. 625, 627. 12 C. C.170, 580. 13
1148 P.S. 559. Ibid, 28.
3139 P. 8. 347. 6 146 P.S. 519.
#152 P. 8. 174, 170. 7156 P. 8. 201.
256 CATTLE,
Sect. 2. For such purpose, the governor shall have power, and he is hereby
authorized to issue his proclamation, stating that the said infectious or contagious
disease exists in any county or counties of the state, and warning all persons to
seclude all animals in their possession that are affected with such disease, or have
been exposed to the infection or contagion thereof, and ordering all persons to take
such precautions against the spreading of such disease as the nature thereof may, in
his judgment, render necessary or expedient; to order that any premises, farm or
farms, where such disease exists, or has existed, be put in quarantine, so that no
domestic animal be removed from said places so quarantined ; and to prescribe such
regulations as he may judge necessary or expedient to prevent infection or contagion
being communicated in any way from the places so quarantined ; to call upon all
sheriffs and deputy-sheriffs to carry out and enforce the provisions of such procla-
mations, orders and regulations, and it shall be the duty of all the cheriffs and
deputy-sheriffs to obey and observe all orders and instructions which they may
receive from the governor in the premises; to employ such and so many medical
and veterinary practitioners, and such other persons as he may, from time to time,
deem necessary, to assist him in performing his duty as set forth in the first sec-
tion of this act, and to fix their compensation ; to order all or any animals coming
into the state to be detained at any place or places for the purpose of inspection
and examination ; to prescribe regulations for the destruction of animals affected
with the said infectious or coutagious disease, and for the proper disposition of
their hides and carcasses, and of all objects which might convey infection or con-
tagion (provided that no animal shall be destroyed, unless first examined by a
medical or veterinary practitioner in the employ of the governor as aforesaid) ; to
prescribe regulations for the disinfection of all premises, buildings and railway cars,
and of objects from or by which infection or contagion may take place or be con-
veyed; to alter and modify, from time to time, as he may deem expedient, the terms
of all such proclamations, orders and regulations, and to cancel or withdraw the
same at any time,
Szcr. 3. All the necessary expenses incurred under direction or by authority of
the governor in carrying out the provisions of this act, shall be paid by the treas-
urer, upon the warrant of the auditor-general, on being certified as correct by the
governor: Provided, That animals coming from a neighboring state that have
passed a veterinary examination in said state and have been quarantined and dis-
sharged, shall not be subject to the provisions of this act.
[ 257 }
Of Writs of Certiorari, to Justices of the Peace.
An essay on the nature and effect of the writ of certiorari, the legal provisions relating to it, and
the return to be made by the magistrate.
Ir frequently happens that a party is prevented by law from appealing from the
magistrate’s judgment or proceeding; as, where the amount is below five dollars
thirty-three cents, or where the twenty days allowed for an appeal have elapsed. In
these, and other cases, the only remedy is by certiorarz. Where the magistrate’s
proceedings are erroneous and illegal on the face of his record, this remedy may
be resorted to successfully, and sometimes is, in preference to an appeal. It is a
subject of deep regret that, notwithstanding the terms of the preliminary affidavit,
this writ is so frequently taken merely for the purpose of delay, or of annoyance to
the other party. In a majority of cases, the original judgments are affirmed by the
court, without a color of objection being offered by the exceptant; or if exceptions
e filed, he fails to appear in person or by counsel, on the argument day, to sustain
them. .
A certiorari is a writ of error in every respect but form; its only office being to
remove the proceedings for the inspection of the court.’ It is essentially a writ of
error, applicable only to proceedings not according to the course of the common
law. It issues, by virtue of the provisions of the act of 20th March 1810,° from
the court of common pleas toa justice of the peace, for the purpose of reviewing the
regularity of his proceedings in a civil case. Its office is simply to bring up
the record for review; and the common pleas only examines to see if the justice
acquired jurisdiction, and acted, during the whole proceedings, within the limits
of the jurisdiction thus acquired.* Being a writ of error, in everything but form, to
entitle the party suing it out to a supersedeas he must give security ; which may be
taken by the prothonotary.®
In civil suits before a justice of the peace, under the act of 1810, the power of
the supreme court to remove the proceedings, by certiorari, is taken away, by the
24th section of that act. In such cases, the judgment of a justice is only
reviewable by the court of common pleas; and the 22d section of the same act
provides, that the judgment of the court of common pleas shall be final in all pro-
ceedings so removed, and that no writ of error shall issue thereon.’ The supreme
court cannot review the decision of the common pleas, even if erroneous.’ This,
however, only applies to a judgment on a certiorari issued under the act of 1810 ;
where a subsequent act confers jurisdiction on justices of the peace, to proceed in
a different manner from that directed in that act, the judgment of the common
pleas on certiorari may be re-examined by the supreme court.? It does not apply to
the proceedings of two justices under the landlord and tenant law.° But it does
apply to a proceeding under the stray law ;" and to an action to recover a penalty
for a breach of ordinance.”
In order to obtain a writ of certiorari, the party aggrieved, his agent or attorney,
must make an affidavit, which may be sworn to before the prothonotary, that it is
not sued out for the purpose of delay, but that in his opinion the cause of action
was not cognisable before a justice ; or, that the proceedings proposed to be removed,
are, to the best of his knowledge, unjust and illegal, and if not removed, will oblige
him to pay more money (or to receive less from his opponent) than is justly due.”
The affidavit must substantially follow the words of the act.* The party must also
give security, by recognisance, in double the amount of the judgment, conditioned
J1R.321. 3P.& W.24. 9 Penn. St. 216. Penny. 85.
2 35 Penn. St. 419. 8 43 Penn. St. 111. 42 Leg. Int. 277.
3 Purd. 793. 9 23 Penn. St.521. 25 Ibid. 134.
46N. Y. 312. 10 4 Binn. 185. 28. & KR. 112.
5 2 Phila. 68, ml 2 R. 20.
6 Purd. 793. 12 5 Ibid. 119.
7 Ibid. 794. The act of 1879, enlarging the 18 Purd. 794. ‘ :
jurisdiction of justices to $300, does not affect 4 2Bro.217. 1T.&H. Pr. 891. 3 Bright.
the finality of the judgment on certiorari. 3 Dig. 3009, pl. 25. See Grayd. Forms 38,
17
258 CERTIORARI.
for the payment of the debt, interest and costs, in case the judgment be affirmed,
or the writ of certiorari be discontinued or non-prossed.' ;
The writ issues, of course, on filing the requisite affidavit and recognisance, the
necessity for a special allowance of it by one of the judges having been dispensed
with by the act of 26th April 1855.2 It is directed to the magistrate by whom the
judgment has been rendered, and commands him ‘‘to certify and send before
the court the plea, with all things touching the same, so full and entire as
before him they remain, together with the writ itself, that they may further cause
to be done thereupon that which is right, and according to the law and constitution
of this commonwealth ought.” And on his failure to comply with its command,
the court may compel obedience by an attachment. The original writ must be
delivered to the justice; a service by copy is not sufficient.*
The writ having been duly issued by the prothonotary, and delivered to the
magistrate, it becomes his duty, although the twenty days may have expired, to
certify the whole proceedings had before him, by sending the original precepts or
writs, a transcript from his docket of the proceedings had before him, and the exe-
cution or executions, if any have been issued. If the entire record be not returned,
the party may allege diminution of record, and the court will grant a rule on the
magistrate to send up that part which is wanting. He is liable to attachment if
that rule be disregarded. - After arranging all the process and the copy of his own
proceedings, in order of time, and duly certified, the magistrate should fasten them
to the writ of certiorari, so as to inclose them within it, leaving the indorsement
of the writ exhibited ; he may then write the return on the writ, thus:
‘“To the Honorable the Judges within named, the plea within mentioned, with all
things touching the same, so full and entire as before me they remain, I hereby respect-
fully certify and send, as within I am commanded, together with this writ.”
A. B., Alderman.
It is the duty of the party excepting, to see to the return of the writ. He should
therefore call on the magistrate and obtain the record and file it in the prothonotary’s
office in season for the day appointed by the court for the argument of such matters.
In some of the courts, the rule requires the record to be returned and exceptions
to be filed by a stated time, prior to the argument day; in default of which the
certiorari will be dismissed. No other return than that of the record can be legally
made. The magistrate cannot, for instance, inquire into the fact of the death of
parties to the suit, and return such fact in lieu of that which he is required to fur-
nish. Such a return would subject him to an attachment. These peremptory
rules are based upon the 25th section of the act of 1810, which enjoins the court
to decide thereon at the term to which the proceedings are returnable.®
By the 21st section of the act of 1810, no yudgmené can be set aside on certiorari,
unless it be issued within twenty days after judgment rendered, and served within
five days thereafter. If this provision be not observed, the court will not look into
the judgment, even if it do not appear from the record that the summons was
served, if within the twenty days the defendant had knowledge of the proceedings,
and applied to have the judgment opened.® But if it be apparent on the face of
the record that the summons was not served in the manner directed by the act
of 1810, and the defendant do not appear, the court will reverse the proceedings, on
certiorari, notwithstanding more than twenty days may have elapsed before the
issuing of the writ :’ where there is no legal service of the process on the defendant,
he is not in court, and all the subsequent proceedings are erroneous and void.£ But
in such case, the party must satisfy the court that his application was made within
twenty days after the fact of the entry of the judgment has come to his knowledge!
The fact that notice was not given may be proved by parol.!? A judgment obtained
: Bae ‘ 7 89 Penn. St. 460. And see 1 L. Law Rev.
urd. , note w, 141,
814 Luz. L. Reg. 445. 8 19 Penn. St. 495. 5 Clark 350. 1 Pitts. 271
41 W.« 307, Purd. 709 n. And see 15 W.N. C. 30.
5 Purd. 794, But this clause is merely direc- § 1 Ash. 135. 1 Phila. 439, 1 Kulp 341, And
tory ; the omission to decide at the first term does see 21 Leg. Int. 340. 29 Ibid. 12. 8 Phila. 636.
not oust the jurisdiction of the court. 65 Penn. 10 Ibid. 482. 2 Pears. 360.
Bt. 34. ‘ 10 19 Penn, St. 495.
6 1 Ash, 135,
CERTIORARI. 259
by any trick or fraud ought to be reversed, if the certiorari be taken within a
reasonable time after it is discovered.! So also, where it appears on the face of
the record, that the justice had no jurisdiction, the court will reverse, notwith-
standing the lapse of more than twenty days. This proviso of the act of 1810
only applies to civil suits; an action for a penalty for a breach of ordinance is not
included?
Formerly, the court would not travel into the merits of the original matter, but
took the case as stated on the magistrate’s return.® But now, to prevent injustice,
the evidence given before him will, under special circumstances of fraud or gross
injustice, be inquired into.‘
Where there is reason to suspect partiality or corrupt practice on the part of the
justice, as where he refuses to hear material testimony, the court will permit parol
evidence to be introduced ; so, where one justice re-examines what has been already
determined by another.® But, in general, parol evidence is inadmissible, if the pro-
ceedings appear to be regular on their face, and the justice has acted within the
sphere of his jurisdiction.® The parol evidence must relate to the conduct of
the justice; not to that of the party ;” or to the merits of the case.* If, from the
whole facts, a fair presumption arises that the justice refused to grant a continu-
ance prayed for, because he believed the party was guilty of laches, &c., the cours
will not impute bad motives to him.® .
The act referred to provides that there shall be no reversal for want of formatity’
in the magistrate’s proceedings, if it shall appear, on the face thereof, that the
defendant confessed a judgment for any sum within the jurisdiction of the justice ;,
or that a precept issued in the name of the commonwealth, requiring the defendant
to appear before him on some day certain, or directing the constable to bring the
defendant forthwith before him, agreeable to the provisions of the act; and that
the coustable having served the writ, judgment was rendered on the day fixed, or
some other day to which the case was postponed by the justice, with the knowledge.
of the parties.
As regards the day of appearance and judgment, it should be stated on the
justice’s docket; but if the day of appearance be mentioned, and then the entry
proceed to state that the case was examined and judgment rendered, the court will
presume that judgment was given on that day.’° The magistrate is not bound to
enter on his docket the evidence on which his judgment is founded—it will be.
presumed that it was on legal proof." He need only state the demand and the kind
of evidence produced to support the claim, whether upon bond, note, penal or single »
bill, writing obligatory, book-debt, damages on assumption, or whatever it may be,
so as to enable the court to ascertain the grounds of the controversy, and his decision
thereon.” But if he should, unnecessarily, so enter it, and it be found insufficient
to support the judgment, it will be reversed. So, where the evidence is not the
legal evidence which the law calls for, the court would probably set aside the pro-
ceedings, where the party had no appeal. But where he has ample remedy by
appeal, and, neglecting it, enters bail for the stay of execution, the court will not
interpose.¥ : :
Where it appears on the face of the record, that the magistrate has exceeded his
jurisdiction, by giving judgment and issuing execution for a greater sum than the
act of assembly allows, the court will consider the whole as a nullity, and discharge
a defendant committed under such judgment." But where his jurisdiction evidently
appears on the face of the record, the settled rule has been to form no presumption .
against the accuracy of the proceedings,” and his judgment, though erroneous, is
binding, until reversed, on certiorari or appeal.’®
119 Penn. St. 495. 3 Phila. 258. Chest. Co. R. 203.
2125S. & R. 53. 8 60 Penn. St. 107.
8 2 Dall. 114. 9 Ibid.
“5 Binn. 30. 1 Wood.6. Ibid. 291. Purd. 1° 5 Binn. 29.
708 n. M1 Tbid. 31.
5 1 Ash. 215. 1 Pitts. 271. 3 Ibid. 237. 8 121 Bro. 209. Add. 27. Purd.1146.
Phila, 342. 51 Penn. St. 48. 1 Chest.Co. R. 131Y.251. 4 Ibid. 436.
467. 1 Wood.15. Ibid. 79. Thid. 291. 14 1 Dall. 135.
61 Ash. 51. Ibid. 64. 15 5 Binn. 32. 2 Clark 169.
751 Penn. St. 48. And see 1 Pears. 27..1 %9S.& R.12. 1 Pitts. 271.
260 CERTIORARI.
As justices have not jurisdiction in ai cases of contract, it ought to appear upon
their proceedings what is the nature of the contract on which the action is founded
—and the judgment will be reversed if his jurisdiction does not appear from the
record.’ In an action for trespass to real estate, it need not appear on the record,
that the estate was in the county where the action arose.?_ In an action on a bond,
it is no objection to his jurisdiction that the penalty exceeds $100, if the real debt
do not.
No execution can be set aside on certiorari, for informality, if it appear on the face
of the same, that it issued in the name of the commonwealth after the expiration of
the proper period of time ; and for the sum for which judgment had been rendered,
together with interest thereon and costs; and a day mentioned on which return is
to be made to the execution by the constable ; and that the cause of action shall
have been cognisable before a justice of the peace.
Whatever may be the objections to the execution, it cannot be set aside on certio-
rari, unless the latter be sued out and served within twenty days after the execution
issued, if the justice had jurisdiction of the cause of action.
On the affirmance of a judgment on certiorari, the record is not remitted to the
magistrate; but execution issues at once from the common pleas for the debt,
interest and costs (or for the costs only, as the case may be), without referring the
cause again to the justice.* The party in whose favor the judgment has been
affirmed, may also take a scire factas against the bail, who is liable without any
previous process against the principal.
When, however, the certiorari is non-prossed, the record must be remitted to the
justice to be proceeded in. It never was the practice here or in England to treat
a non-pros as a final judgment, and in this respect there is no difference between a
writ of error and a certiorari. The practice has been general, if not universal, to
collect the debt in such case by an execution from the justice.®
The costs in the event of a second action being brought, and a trial had, after a
reversal of the prior judgment on a certiorar?, are provided for by the twenty-fifth
section of the act of 1810, already mentioned. It directs that when the plaintiff
removes and reverses the justice’s proceedings, and on a second trial before him, or
any other justice, if judgment shall not be obtained for a sum equal to or greater
than the original judgment, the plaintiff shall pay all costs accrued on the second
trial, as well as those which accrued at the court, including any fees, not exceeding
four dollars, which the defendant may have given his attorney in such trial, together
with fifty cents per day to the defendant while attending court in defence of the
proceedings ; and where the defendant removes and reverses the judgment, and it
shall appear that he attended the trial before the justice, or had legal notice to attend
the same, and on a final trial being had as aforesaid, the plaintiff shall obtain judg-
ment for a sum equal to or greater than the original judgment, the defendant shall
pay all costs accrued on the second trial before the justice of the peace, as well as
those which accrued at the court before whom the proceedings have been set aside,
including any fees which the plaintiff may have given to any attorney, not exceeding
four dollars, to defend the proceedings of the justice, together with fifty cents
per day while attending at court on the same; which costs shall be recovered
before any justice of the peace, in the same manner as sums of a similar amount
are recoverable.
The right to recover the costs on a writ of certiorari depends on the relative
amount recovered or abated by the subsequent judgment: therefore, upon the
reversal, on certiorari, of an execution, on the ground that no judgment had been
entered by the justice on an award of referees, and the judgment is subse-
quently entered, and the money recovered, the costs of the certiorart cannot be
recovered by the defendant in error from the plaintiff in error.’ A judgment of
reversal on certiorart does not carry costs.
See Actions at Law, V.
1 1 Bro. 339. 1 Phila. 518. 11 Ibid. 348. Seo 5658. & R. 573.
1 Wood. 211. 63P. & W. 24
2 2 Clark 169. 3 Ibid. 295. See 1 Phila. 516. 7 4 W. 450.
6 Ibid. 222. 8 Bartram v. Atkinson, Com. Pleas, Phila, 1858,
31M. 270. 2 W. N.C. 16. 2 Ohest. Co. R. 488, 489. And
= 1Dall.400. 3 P. & W. 24. see 5 Binn. 204. 9 L. Bar 185. 1 Wood. 140.
[ 261 ]
Cigarettes.
Act 7 May 1889. Purd. 483.
If any person or persons shall sell cigarettes to any person or persons under the age .
of sixteen years, he or she so offending shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon
Sohn thereof shall be sentenced to pay a fine of not more than three hundred
ollars.
Commissions and Discharges.
Act 30 APRIL 1885. Purd. 539.
Sxcr. 1. It shall be unlawful for any person or persons who has or have the posses-
sion or control of, or who may hereafter become possessed of, the commission or dis-
charge papers of any officer, soldier, sailor or marine of the United States army or
navy, to withhold the same from the party named in such commission or discharge
when such officer, soldier, sailor or marine shall demand possession thereof.
It shall also be unlawful for any person or persons having the possession of any
commission or discharge, as aforesaid, to wilfully destroy, mutilate, or destroy to
make away with, such commission or discharge, to the prejudice of the owner thereof,
or to deliver the same to any person other than the party named therein, without the
written request of such officer, soldier, sailor or marine.
In case of the death of the party named in such commission or discharge, when the
possession may be as aforesaid, the party or parties having possession shall deliver
up the same on the written request of the widow, or legal representative of such
officer, soldier, sailor or marine.
Sct. 2. Any person or persons who shall violate the provisions of the preceding
section, or refuse to comply with the requirements thereof, shall be deemed guilty of
a misdemeanor, and on conviction thereof, shall be fined not exceeding five hundred
dollars, and imprisoned not exceeding three months, or both, or either, at the discre-
tion of the court before which the conviction be made.
[ 262 ]
Common Carriers.
I. Who are common carriers. IV. Carriers of passengers.
II. Liabilities of common carriers. V. Carriage of explosives,
III. Lien of common carriers.
I. WHO ARE COMMON CARRIERS.
ALL persons carrying goods for hire, as masters and owners of ships, hoymen,
lightermen, stage-coachmen, and the like, come under the denomination of common
carriers! Any person undertaking, for hire, to carry the goods of all persons
indifferently, is, as to the liability imposed, to be considered a common carrier.? A
wagoner, who carries goods for hire, thereby contracts the responsibilities of a
common carrier, whether transportation be his principal and direct business, or an
occasional and incidental employment.’ One who holds himself forth to the public
to carry for hire, is a common carrier, as much in his first trip as in any subsequent
one.*
Owners of steamboats, carrying freight and parcels for hire, are common carriers,
and subject to their liabilities ;° so of a company using steamboats and railroads ;*
so of boatmen and other freighters for hire, on navigable rivers and canals.’ A
ferryman is a common carrier ;° so is an express company ;? and a baggage express
company.” So also is the proprietor of a stage-coach, who is in the habit of con-
veying parcels not belonging to passengers ;“ and anowner of hacks ; so, of a pipe
line company. But the owners of a tug-boat are not common carriers: they are
merely bailors for hire ;* nor is a sleeping-car company.”
II. LIABILITY OF COMMON CARRIERS.
A common carrier is bound to receive and carry all goods offered for transporta-
tion, subject to all the responsibilities incident to his employment, and is liable to
an action in case of refusal, without sufficient cause.* A railroad company is bound
to carry express matter for an express company ;"" ‘but they need not furnish equal
facilities to all'such companies ;* so the owner of a ferry for carriages is bound to
convey carriages and their contents.” A railroad company is responsible in damages,
for a delay in transporting freight in the usual time, though caused by a “strike”
on the part of its employees, without any fault in its superior officers.2® And such
“strike” is no excuse for refusing to receive freight for transportation ; the duties
imposed by law must be performed at whatever cost.”
Common carriers are liable for any injury which happens to goods intrusted to
their care, unless caused by the act of God, inevitable accident, the public enemy,
or the act of the owner of the property ;” and this rule extends as well to carriers
by water as to carriers by land.* But a common carrier is not relieved from
responsibility, by showing that the goods intrusted to his care were injured by the
act of God, if his own'negligence contributed thereto.* Where the loss is the result,
1 Selw. N. P. 358. 1 Bouv. Inst. 410. See 67 has been held not to be a common carrier. 46
Barb. 513. 32 How. Pr. 616; s. 0. 39 Barb. Mich. 38.
488. 1418 Penn. St. 40. 63 Ibid. 51. 77 Ibid. 238,
2 1 Salk. 249. 2 Greenl. Evid. 3 208. 32 Penn. 95 U.S. 297.
St. 208. 2 Zab. 372. 16 4 W. N. 0. 240. 1 Rob. 0. C. 66. See 3 Penny.
31W. & 8.285. 18 Tex. 498, 78.
: ap Fenn: St. 120. 16 6 How. 382.
3 Wend. 158. "37 24 Penn. St. 378, 381. 2 Flip. é
6 13 Ibid. 611. Dav. 82. Rep. 517. ‘ sr
1 2 Bailey 421. 18117 U.S. 1.
8 3 Penn. St. 342. 3 Met. (Ky.) 51. 2N.& %10M.4& W. 16.
McC. 17. See 42 Ga. 528. 52N. Y¥. 32. 20 20 N. ¥. 48. 54 Ibid. 500.
9 51 N. Y. 166, 21 28 Hun 558.
10 2 Bosw. 589. And see 74 Ill. 116. 2 8S. & R. 533. 6 Johns. 160. 21 Wend. 19%
115 R. 179. 1 Pick. 53. 2 Dana 430. 11N. ¥. 485. 29Ibid. 115. 21 How. 7.
13 §3 Iowa 298. 19 Ill. 556. 33-10 Johus. 1. 21 Wend. 190. 2 Binn. 74.
9 27 Pitts. L.J.79. But alog-driving company 14 Hun 564.
COMMON CARRIERS. 263
in any degree, of human aid or interference, it is not deemed the act of God, so as to
exempt the carrier from responsibility... The burden of proof is upon the carrier,
to prove that a loss was occasioned by a cause for which he is not responsible. The
responsibility of a carrier by rail lasts until delivery to the consignee, or until
the responsibility of another party begins,®
A carrier may limit his common-law liability by express contract ;* or by the
terms of a bill of lading, accepted by the shipper.® So, a carrier may limit his
responsibility, by a general notice : but its terms must be clear and explicit, and
knowledge thereof must be brought home to the passenger.6 An express company
may limit its responsibility to a certain amount, unless the article be specially
insured, and so specified in the receipt.’ An exception in the bill of lading of
liability from loss by fire, or other unavoidable accidents, extends to all losses by fire,
whether unavoidable or not, unless occasioned by the negligence of the carrier.®
But a carrier cannot, by contract, exempt himself from liability for actual negli-
gence ;° much less can he contract for exemption from liability for the wilful
misconduct of his servants.° A receipt for goods containing a limitation of the
earrier’s common-law liability, does not extend to a connecting carrier, with whom
there is no such contract, though the place of destination be noted.”
If the shipper of goods be guilty of any fraud or imposition upon the carrier, by
concealing the value or nature of the articles, he cannot hold the carrier liable for
an injury sustained in consequence of the parcel being treated as of little value.
Where a carrier, after an unsuccessful attempt to find the consignee, stores the
goods, his liability as such is at an end; he is subsequently liable only as a ware-
houseman, on proof of negligence.® But a tender after business hours, when the
consignee is unable to receive them, will not discharge the carrier.
III. Lien oF cOMMON CARRIERS.
It is laid down, as a general rule, that whenever any one is obliged to receive
goods, to perform any duty on them, he has a lien on them at common law; for, as
tJ,at imposes the burden, it also gives him the power of retaining for his indemnity.”*
Yet this lien extends only to the carriage price of the particular goods on which
we lien is due. Any further lien, fora general balance, must be founded on a gen-
eral usage of trade, or on a particular contract to that effect between the parties.’*
A common carrier has a lien on the goods carried for the freight." But this
lien is inseparably associated with the possession of the goods, and is lost by
an unconditional delivery ; there may, however, be a conditional delivery to the
consignee, with an understanding.that the lien for freight shall not be affected.° A
carrier, at common law, has no lien for back freights; such lien can only
be established by proof of a general usage of trade, for which there there must be
satisfactory evidence of instances sufficiently numerous and general to warrant so
extensive a conclusion affecting the custom of the realm.” Even where there is an
agreement that the carrier shall have a lien for back freight, he cannot retain the
goods as against the consignee or real owner.” So, if an ultimate carrier pay back
freight to an intermediate carrier, who has already received payment from the
consignor, he has no lien therefor, as against the consignee.” A carrier, however,
129N.Y.115. See 87 Penn. St. 234. 9 23 Penn. St. 526. 30 Ibid. 242. 32 Ibid. 414.
21 Black 156. 3 Story 349. 6 McLean 76. 51 Ibid. 315. 57 Ibid. 335. 63 Ibid. 14. 69
2 Bl. C. C, 425. Tan. Dec. 519. 1 McAll. 181. Ibid. 394.
3 60 Penn. St. 109. 10 14 L. R., Ir. 157, But see 31 How. Pr. 430.
49 Watts 87. 6 W. & S. 495. 11 61 Penn. St. 81. 5 Lans,480;s. c.49 N. Y. 616.
5 55 Penn. St. 53. If a receipt for baggage 23 W.4&S. 21. 19 Penn. St. 243.
contain a limitation of responsibility, printed in 18 83 Penn. St. 22.
much smaller type than the body of it, soasnot 45 W. & 8.123. 3N. Y. 322.
likely to be noticed at the time, it will not bind 1 Ld. Raym. 752. 25 Penn. St. 120.
the passenger, unless his attention be expressly 16 Jeremy on Carriers 70.
called to it, 32 Penn. St. 208. 43.N. Y.264. A 1 5 Wall. 481. Ibid. 545, 2H. D. Sm. 195.
discovery of the notice by the passenger, afterhe 18 1 Black 108. 4 Den. 496, The act of 14
has entered upon his journey, does not affect his December 1863, Purd. 311, alters the rule of the
rights. 48 N. Y. 212. A ticket printed in the common law, that continued possession 1s neces-
English language is not notice to a German who sary in order to enforce the lien.
does not understand it. 16 Penn. St. 67. 19 2 Gr. 139. ;
6 16 Penn. St. 67. 20 6 Bast 519. 2 Smith 624
1 6 Phila. 174. 21 5 Bos. & Pul. 64. 5 B. & Ald. 350.
8 67 Penn. St. 211. Ibid. 500. 48 Barb. 97. 22 37 Barb. 236.
264 COMMON CARRIEBS.
who has dehvered part of the consignment, has a lien upon the remainder for the
freight due upon the whole.' A delivery fraudulently obtained does not divest
the carrier’s lien for freight ;*he may sue in replevin for the goods.’ A common carrier
who innocently receives goods from a wrongdoer, without the consent of the owner,
express or implied, has no lien upon them for their carriage, against such owner.’
Tn all cases in which commission-merchants, factors and all common carriers,
or other persons shall have a lien, under existing Jaws, upon any goods, wares
merchandise or other property, for or on account of the costs or expenses of
carriage, storage or labor bestowed on such goods, wares, merchandise or other
property, if the owner or consignee of the same shall fail or neglect or refuse to
pay the amount of charges upon any such property, goods, wares or merchandise,
within sixty days after demand thereof, made personally upon such owner or
consignee, then and in such case, it shall and may be lawful for any such com-
mission-merchant, factor, common carrier or other person having such lien as
aforesaid, after the expiration of said period of sixty days, to expose such goods,
wares, merchandise or other property to sale, at public auction, and to sell the same,
or so much thereof as shall be sufficient to discharge said lien, together with costs
of sale and advertising: Provided, That notice of such sale, together with the
name of the person or persons to whom such goods shall have been consigned,
shall have been first published, for three successive weeks, in a newspaper pub-
lished in the county, and by six written or printed handbills, put up in the most
public and conspicuous places in the vicinity of the depot where the said goods
may be.*
pon the application of any of the persons or corporations having a lien upon
goods, wares, merchandise or other property, as mentioned in the first section of
this act, verified by affidavit, to any of the judges of the courts of common pleas
of this commonwealth, setting forth that the places of residence of the owner and
consignee of any such goods, wares, merchandise or other property are unknown,
or that such goods, wares, merchandise or other property are of such perishable
nature, or so damaged, or showing any other cause that shall render it impracti-
cable to give the notice as provided for in the first section of this act, then and in
such case, it shall and may be lawful for a judge of the city or county in which
the goods may be, to make an order, to be by him signed, authorizing the sale of
such goods, wares, merchandise or other property, upon such terms as to notice, aa
the nature of the case may admit of, and to such judge shall seem meet: Provided,
That in cases of perishable property, the affidavit and proceedings required by this
section may be had before a justice of the peace.®
The residue of moneys, arising from any such sales, either under the first or
second sections of this act, after deducting the amount of the lien as aforesaid,
together with costs of advertising and sales, shall be held subject to the order of
the owner or owners of such property.®
This act relieves the carrier from the operation of the common-law rule, that con-
tinued possession is necessary in order to the enforcement of his lien." An order
of sale, under the 2d section, does not authorize such sale, without opening the
packages and exposing the contents to purchasers.®
See tit, LrEn.
IV. CARRIERS OF PASSENGERS.
It shall be the duty of the owner or owners of any railroad, steamboat or other
conveyance for the transportation of passengers, to provide each agent, who may
be authorized to sell tickets, or other certificates entitling the holder to travel upon
any railroad, steamboat or other public conveyance, with a certificate, setting forth
the authority of such agent to make such sales; which certificate shall be duly
attested by the corporate seal, if such there be, of the owner of such railroad,
steamboat or other public conveyance, and also by the signatures of the owner,
1 25 Penn. St. 120. 15 Phila, 101. 5 Act 14 December 1863 3 2. Purd. 311.
2 6 Hill 43. 6 Ibid. 2 3.
8 5 Cush. 137. 8 Gray 262. 7 68 Penn. St. 414,
4 Act 14 December 1863 2 1. Purd. 311. 8 75 Ibid. 246. 9 Phila. 70
COMMON CARRIERS, 265
or officer whose name is signed upon the tickets or coupons, which such agents
may sell.
It shall not be lawful for any person, not possessed of such authority, so evidenced,
to sell, barter or transfer, for any consideration whatever, the whole, or any part, of
any ticket or tickets, passes, or other evidences of the holder’s title to travel on any
railroad, steamboat or other public conveyance, whether the same be situated,
operated or owned within or without the limits of this commonwealth.?
Any person or persons, violating the provisions of the second section of this act,
shall be deemed guilty of misdemeanor, and shall be liable to be punished, by a fine
not exceeding five hundred dollars, and by imprisonment not exceeding one year,
or either or both, in the discretion of the court in which such person or persons
shall be convicted.’
It shall be the duty of every agent, who shall be authorized to sell tickets, or
parts of tickets, or other evidences of the holder’s title to travel, to exhibit to any
person desiring to purchase a ticket, or to any officer of the law, who may request
him, the certificate of his authority thus to sell, and to keep said certificate posted
in a conspicuous place in his office, for the information of travellers.*
It shall be the duty of the owner or owners of railroad, steamboat and other pub-
lic conveyances, to provide for the redemption of the whole or any parts or coupons
of any ticket or tickets, as they may have sold, as the purchaser, for any reason,
has not used, and does not desire to use, at a rate which shall be equal to the differ-
ence between the price paid for the whole ticket, and the cost of a ticket between
the points for which the proportion of said ticket was actually used ; and the sale,
by any person, of the unused portion of any ticket, otherwise than by the presenta-
tion of the same for redemption, as provided for in this section, shall be deemed to
be a violation of the provisions of this act, and shall be punished as is hereinbefore
provided: Provided, That this act shall not prohibit any person who has purchased
a ticket from any agent authorized by this act, with the bond fide intention of
travelling upon the same, from selling any part of the same to any other person, if
such person travels upon the same the whole distance between the points named in
the said ticket, from selling the unused part of the same to the company that sold the
same ; and it shall be the duty of the said company to pay for such unused portion
of ticket the difference between the actual fare to point used, and the amount paid
for such ticket.®
This act is constitutional. But one who purchases from a scalper in another state,
where such sale is lawful, a railroad ticket to a point in this state, is entitled to be
conveyed to his destination, in pursuance thereof, notwithstanding its provisions."
A round trip railroad ticket, not limited by its terms, is good until used, unless the
purchaser was personally notified to the contrary at the time he bought it.® A rail-
road company is not bound to keep a ticket agent in the office, at an ordinary way-
station, to sell tickets during the stoppage of the train ; it is sufficient, that the agent
was there up to the time of the arrival of the train?
Any railroad or railway corporation, within this commonwealth, that shall
exclude, or allow to be excluded, by their agents, conductors or employees, from
any of their passenger cars, any person or persons, on account of color or race, or
that shall refuse to carry in any of their cars, thus set apart, any person or per-
sons, on account of color or race, or that shall, for such reason, compel or attempt
to compel any person or persons, to occupy any particular part of any of their cars,
set apart for the accommodation of people as passengers, shall be liable, in an action
of debt, to the person thereby injured or aggrieved in the sum of five hundred
dollars, the same to be recovered in an action of debt as like amounts are now by
law recoverable.” : 2 Dates
Any agent, conductor or employee of any railroad or railway corporation, within
this commonwealth, who shall exclude, allow to be excluded, or assist in the exclu.
1 Act 6 May 1863 31. Purd. 310. 8 14 Phila. 384.
2 Thid. 3 2. 7 100 Penn. St. 259.
3 Ibid. ¢ 3. 8 105 Ibid. 142. 100 Ibid. 259.
$ Ibid. 2 4. 9 26 Pitts. L. J. 117.
5 Ibid. 35. So amended hy act 10 April 1872. 0 Act 22 March 1867 3 1. Purd. 1807.
P.L. 51
266
COMMON CARRIERS.
sion, from any of their cars, set apart for the accommodation of passengers, any
person or persons, on account of color or race, or who shall refuse to carry such per-
gon or persons, on account of color or race, or who shall throw any car or cars from
the track, thereby preventing persons from riding, shall be deemed guilty of a
misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof, shall pay a fine not exceeding five
hundred dollars, nor less than one hundred dollars, or be imprisoned for a term not
exceeding three months, nor less than thirty days, or both, at the discretion of the
court.!
Independently of this act, the separation of black and white passengers in a
public conveyance was the subject of a sound regulation to secure order, promote
comfort, preserve the peace and maintain the rights of both carriers and passen-
gers.2 And a carrier of passengers has still a right to designate the car which
travellers shall enter, without being obliged to give any reason for the selection.’
But carriers of passengers are bound to carry all who offer themselves, against
whose personal character and conduct there are no just objections, provided they
have sufficient accommodations; they have no more right to refuse a passenger
than an innkeéper has to turn away a guest.‘
Each passenger upon a railroad, shall have the right to have carried in the car,
or place provided for that purpose, in the train in which he or she may be a pas-
senger, his or her personal clothing, not exceeding, inclusive of the trunk or box
in which it may be contained, one hundred pounds in weight, and three hundred
dollars in value.®
No railroad company shall, under any circumstances, be liable for loss or damage
to any baggage or property belonging to any such passenger, beyond the said sum
of three hundred dollars, unless it shall be proven that the excess in value thereof
over that sum, was truly declared to the agents of the company, at the time of its
delivery for transportation, and the sum charged by the railroad company for such
transportation over and above passage fare was paid: Provided, however, That the
said declaration shall not relieve the claimant from proving the actual value of
the articles alleged to have been lost or damaged ; but in no event shall there be
any recovery beyond the value thus declared.® ,
No railroad company providing a car or other place for the deposit of passengers’
baggage shall, under any circumstances, be liable for loss of, or damage to, any
articles or property whatsoever, not there deposited by the passenger, or which are
placed by him or her in the car in which he or she is to be transported."
This act has no application to the carriage of baggage by a foreign corporation,
in another state?
Where a passenger’s trunk is lost, the carrier is prima facie
liable for its value ;* but not for the value of other articles than ordinary wearing
‘apparel.’
the reasonable tools of a carpenter.”
A carpenter, however, may recover the value of his tools contained,
with his clothing, in a trunk, lost by the carrier; it being found that they were
_No railroad, railway or other transportation company, having accepted the pro-
visions of the seventeenth article of the constitution, or hereafter organized, shall
grant free passes, or passes at a discount, to any person except to an officer or employee
of the company issuing the same; and any person signing or issuing any such free
passes, or passes at a discount, except to officers or employees as aforesaid, shall be
subject to pay a fine to the commonwealth not exceeding one hundred dollars:
Provided, That nothing herein contained shall be held to prevent the use of passes
granted previous to the adoption of the present constitution, the limited time
whereof has not expired, nor to prevent the use of passes granted for a valuable
consideration, under contracts made between corporation and individuals, or between
one corporation and another.”
Riding on a free pass does not render the person using it a trespasser, nor pre-
vent him from recovering for injuries caused by the negligence of the company ;
the conductor should collect the regular fare."
1 Act 22 March 1867 3 2. Purd. 1807.
2 65 Penn. St. 209. 4 Phila. 255. 95 U. 8.485.
3 86 Penn. St. 421, Paxson, J.
4 1 Bouv. Inst. 417. 2 Sum. 221.
5 Act 11 April 1867 21. Purd. 1808,
6 Ibid.
7 Tbid.
2.
3
8 83 Penn. St. 316.
9 16 Ibid. 67.
10 5 W.N. C. 292.
1114 Penn. St, 129.
12 Act 15 June 1874 2 1. Purd. 1808.
13 3 Penny. 190. See 14 How. 468. 16 Ibid.
COMMON CARRIERS. 267
No act of the general assembly shall limit the amount to be recovered for injuries
resulting in death, or for injuries to persons or property; and, in case of death
from such injuries, the right of action shall survive, and the general assembly shall
prescribe for whose benefit such action shall be prosecuted. No act shall prescribe
any limitations of time within which suits may be brought against corporations for
injuries to persons or property, or for other causes, different from those fixed by
general laws regulating actions against natural persons ; and such acts now existing
are avoided.
No action hereafter brought to recover damages for injuries to the person by
negligence or default, shall abate by reason of the death of the plaintiff; but the
personal representatives of the deceased may be substituted as plaintiff, and prose-
cute the suit to final judgment and satisfaction.?
Whenever death shall be occasioned by unlawful violence or negligence, and no
suit for damages be brought by the party injured, during his or her life, the widow
of any such deceased, or, if there be no widow, the personal representatives, may
maintain an action for and recover damages for the death thus occasioned?
The persons entitled to recover damages for any injury causing death, shall be
the husband, widow, children or parents of the deceased, and no other relative;
and the sum recovered shall go to them in the proportion they would take his or
her personal estate, in case of intestacy, and that without liability to creditors.‘
The declaration shall state who are the parties entitled in such action; the action
shall be brought within one year after the death, and not thereafter.®
In all actions now or hereafter instituted against common carriers or corporations
owning, operating or using a railroad as a public highway, whereon steam or other
motive power is used, to recover for loss and damage sustained, and arising either
from personal injuries or loss of life, and for which, by law, such carrier or corpo-
ration could be held responsible, only such compensation for loss and damage shall
be recovered as the evidence shall clearly prove to have been pecuniarily suffered
or sustained.
The constitution of 1874 abrogated all limitations of the amount to be recovered
in actions for negligence, contained in existing laws ;’ and all special laws limiting
the time for bringing such actions: but it does not repeal the general limitation of
one year contained in the act of 1855.°
A railroad company is responsible for the sufficiency of its road, and it is only
necessary to show an injury to person or property, sustained through the negligence
of the company or its officers, to recover. The mere fact of a collision, is prima
facie evidence of negligence ;“ but this rule only applies to cases of injury to a
passenger ; in other cases, the burden of proving the defendant’s negligence is on
the plaintiff? A railroad company is responsible to its train-servants and employees
for injuries received by them, in consequence of neglect of duty by a conductor in
charge of the train, with the right to direct its movements, and control the persons
employed upon it.”
An action will lie in this state for negligence resulting in death, though the
injury and death occurred in another state, whose laws give a like remedy.“ The
right of action is a transistory one.”
Where the deceased leaves a widow and parents, the right of action is exclu-
sively in the widow ;6 the widow and minor children ought not to be joined
as plaintiffs.” A parent may recover for the death of an adult son, if the famil
telation be shown to continue ;* otherwise not;® but the mother of a bastard child
is not within the act.° Where the suit is for the benefit of minor children, the
1 Const. Art. III. 2 12. 11 90 Penn. St. 135. 94 Ibid. 351.
2 Act 15 April 1851 2 18. Purd. 1603. 12 87 Ibid. 34. 97 Ibid. 70. 93 Ibid. 449. 96
8 Ibid. 2 19. Ibid. 83.
4 Act 26 April 1855 3 1. Purd. 1603. 13-112 U.S. 377.
5 Ibid. 2 2. 1k 16 W. N.C. 381.
§ Act 4 April 1868 3 2. Purd. 1604. 16 103 U.S. 11.
7 103 Penn. St. 425. 14 W. N.C. 505. 16 100 Penn. St. 95.
8 25 Pitts. L. J. 184. 41 Leg. Int. 346. 1113 W.N. C. 389. And see 84 Penn. St. 419.
911 Penn. St. 141. 30 Ibid. 242. 18 55 Penn. St.499. 67 Ibid. 300. 90 Ibid. 15.
10 30 Ibid. 242. 1 Phila. 543. 13 Leg. Int. 4. 19 100 Ibid. 95. See 6 Phila. 178.
5 Exch. 787. 20 11 W.N. C, 120.
268 COMMON CARRIERS.
amount recovered is to be distributed among them, as in case of intestacy.’ The
constitution of 1874 has not abrogated the right of the administrator to sue, In a
proper case.’ : ro Meaee
The damages to be recovered by the surviving relatives for an injury resulting in
death, are confined to such as are capable of a pecuniary estimate ; nothing can be
allowed for the mental sufferings of the survivors, or the corporal sufferings of the
injured party.® But, nevertheless, the amount of damages must be left mainly to
the sound sense and deliberate judgment of the jury, applied to all the facts and
circumstances of the case.t Life, by law, has a value, for the loss of which the
survivors have a right to be compensated, in view of its circumstances; the sound
sense of the jury must ascertain the pecuniary value, from the evidence in the case,
as best they may. The act of 1868 was but declaratory of the law, as already
fixed by the decisions of the supreme court.® : .
When any person shall sustain personal injury or loss of life while lawfully
engaged or employed on or about the roads, works, depots and premises of a railroad
company, or in or about any train or car therein or thereon, of which company such
person is not an employee, the right of action and recovery in all such cases against
the company shall be such only as would exist if such person were an employee:
Provided, That this section shall not apply to passengers.””
This act is constitutional, as a police regulation.’ Under it, any one, not a pas-
senger, who enters the depot of a railroad company, takes the risk upon bimself.
If any person or persons in the service or employ of a railroad or other trans-
portation company, doing business in this state, shall refuse or neglect to obey any
rule or regulation of such company, or, by reason of negligence or wilful misconduct,
shall fail to observe any precaution or rule, which it was his duty to obey and
observe, and injury or death to any person or persons shall thereby result, such
person or persons so offending shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and on
conviction thereof shall be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding five thousand
dollars, and to undergo an imprisonment in the county jail or in the state peniten-
tiary not exceeding five years: Provided, That nothing in this act shall be
construed to be a bar to a trial and conviction for any other or higher offence, or to
relieve such person or persons from liability in a civil action for such damages as
may have been sustained.”
It shall be the duty of the prosecuting attorney of the city or county where any
such injuries may have happened, as soon as he shall have notice of the same, to
take immediate action and legal measures for the apprehension and arrest of the
person or persons who may be charged with causing the injuries as foresaid, and
to direct subpcenas to issue from any justice of the peace to witnesses, to appear
and testify on the part of the commonwealth touching such offences charged as
aforesaid, and to prosecute the offenders as in other cases of misdemeanor: And
provided further, That no conviction of the employees shall relieve the company
from any liability for any such injuries or death."
This act punishes both negligence and wilful misconduct; they are distinct
offences; sleeping on duty is negligence per se.™
V. CARRIAGE OF EXPLOSIVES.
If any person shall knowingly deliver, or cause to be delivered, to any canal, rail-
road, steamboat or other transportation company, or to any person, firm or corpora-
tion engaged in the business of transportation, any nitro-glycerine, dualin, dynamite,
gunpowder, mining or blasting powder, guncotton, phosphorus, or other explosive
material adapted for blasting, or for any other purpose for which the articles before
mentioned, or any of them, may be used, under any false or deceptive invoice or
description, or without informing such person, firm or corporation, in writing, at
1 44 Penn. St. 175. T Act 4 April 1868 31. Purd, 1604.
2 95 Ibid. 158, 8 76 Peun. St. 506.
5 31 Ibid. 372. 33 Ibid. 318. 36 Ibid. 298, 912 Phila, 394. 89 Penn. St. 193. See 81
100 Ibid. 98. 5 Clark 444. 40 Leg. Int. 86. Ibid. 366. 92 Ibid. 82. 104 Ibid. 511. 15 Leg,
And see 87 Penn. St. 365. Int. 459.
4 5 Wall. 90. 10 Act 22 March 1865 21. Purd. 534.
5 67 Ponn. St. 300. Wl Ibid. 2 2.
6 Ibid 12 3 Brewst. 554. And see 26 Leg. Int. 48,
COMMON LAW. 269
or before the time when such delivery is made, of the true nature of such, and
without having the keg, barrel, can or package containing the same plainly marked
with the name of the explosive material therein contained, together with the word
“dangerous” article, such person shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon con-
viction thereof, shall be sentenced to imprisonment for thirty days, and to pay a
fine of one hundred dollars ; and shall be responsible for all damages to persons or
property, directly or indirectly resulting from the explosion or combustion of any
such article.*
It shall and may be lawful for any officer or agent of any person, firm or corpo-
ration engaged in the business of transportation, upon affidavit made of the fact
that any package tendered for transportation, not in compliance with the provisions
of the first section hereof, is believed to contain explosive material such as afore-
said, to require such package to be opened, and to refuse to receive any such
package, unless such requirement be complied with; and if such package be
opened, and found to contain any explosive material, the said package and its con-
tents shall be forthwith removed to any lawful place for the storing of gunpowder;
and after conviction of the offender, or after three months from such removal, the
said package, with its contents, shall be sold at public sale, after the expiration of
ten days from notice of the time and place of such sale, published in one newspaper
in the county where such seizure shall have been made; and the proceeds of such
sale, after deducting therefrom the expenses of removal, storage, advertisement
and sale, shall be paid into the treasury of the said county.’
Common Law.
THE common law and the statute Jaw flow originally from the same fountain—
the legislature. The statute law being the will of the legislature remaining on
record in writing—the common law, nothing else but statutes anciently written, but
which have been worn out by time. All the laws of England began by consent of
the legislature; and whether it be now law by custom, by usage, or by writing,
it is the same thing.® :
The ‘‘common law” mentioned in the 7th art. of the amendments of the consti-
tution of the United States, is the common law of England, and not that of any
individual state‘ The constitution and laws of the United States are predicated in
the existence of the common law.’ The common law of England has always been
in force in Pennsylvania.® = ;
In all cases where a remedy is provided, or duty enjoined, or anything directed
to be done by any act or acts of assembly of this commonwealth, the direction of
the said acts shall be strictly pursued, and no penalty shall be inflicted, or anything
done agreeable to the provisions of the common law in such cases, further than
shall be necessary for carrying such act or acts into effect.’ :
The common law is, in many particulars, much more extensive and important than
the statute. It is often denounced, yet it is the great guardian of our rights. In
many respects, it is so sacred, that what is the common law of England, is, in this
country, placed beyond legislative interference, by being incorporated in the consti-
tutions of the different states. It was brought here by the colonists, and was
considered the birth-right of the people. Wherever the conquests of Hngland
reach, to whatever quarter her colonies extend, the common law goes with them.
That it was brought here, and that we inherit it, was never doubted.’ The com-
mon law will be presumed to prevail in a sister state, in the absence of any evidence
that it has been changed by statute.®
1 Act 6 May 187431. Purd. 312. 7 Purd. 77, 543, For the decisions on this
2 Thid. 2 2. statute, see tit. “ Acts of Assembly,” IT.
3 Wilmot, C. J., 2 Wils. 348-51. 81 Phila. 536. And see 4 Paige 178. 15
* 1 Gallis. 20. Wend. 111. 13 How Pr. 454.
5 Bald. 558. ® 3 Daly 288.
§ 1 Dall. 67.
[ 270 ]
Common Scold.
Tue offence of being a common scold is indictable, and may be punished by fine
and imprisonment at the discretion of the court.’ .
The punishment of the ducking stool cannot be inflicted in Pennsylvania? The
revised Penal Code provides that every offence whatever, not thereby specially pro-
vided for, may be punished as heretofore.* ;
To convict of this offence, it must be shown to be to the common nuisance of the
neighborhood.* In such prosecution, the district attorney will not be ordered to
furnish a bill of particulars.®
Compounding Offences.
IF any person having a knowledge of the actual commission of any misprision
of treason, murder, manslaughter, rape, sodomy, buggery, arson, forgery, counter-
feiting or passing counterfeit money or notes, burglary, housebreaking, robbery,
larceny, receiving stolen goods or other property by persons knowing them to be
stolen, kidnapping, bribery, perjury or subornation of perjury, shall take money,
goods, chattels, lands or other reward, or promise thereof, to compound or conceal,
or upon agreement to compound or conceal, the crimes aforesaid, every person so
offending shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and on conviction thereof, be sentenced
to pay a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars, and to undergo an imprisonment
not exceeding three years.®
This section, which embraces the misprision of felony, and the theft-bote of the
common law, by which these crimes were punished by fine and imprisonment, is
essentially new to our statute law. The only existing statutory punishment appli-
cable to this class of crimes, is that found in the 32d section of the act of the 31st
of May 1718,’ which makes any person who shall agree or compound or take satis-
faction for any stealing or goods stolen, subject to forfeit twice the value of the
sums agreed for or taken. The concealment of any of the infamous crimes embraced
in this section, for the consideration of money, or property given or paid, as the
price of such concealment, is a crime made so base from the motives which have
induced it, as to render it the proper subject of penal infliction. Simple conceal-
ment, from mistaken notions of vity and compassion, or generous forgiveness, are
not embraced in the enactment.®
Though the bare taking again of a man’s own goods which have been stolen,
without favor shown to the thief, is no offence,® yet, where he either takes back the
goods, or receives other amends, on condition of not prosecuting, this is a misde-
meanor punishable by fine and imprisonment.” An agreement to put an end to an
indictment for a misdemeanor is unlawful,” unless it be with the consent of the court.
And there can be no recovery on a note or mortgage given on such consideration ;¥
if, however, the contract be fully executed the money paid cannot be recovered back.!
Compounding informations on penal statutes is an offence at common law. Some-
what analogous to the offence of compounding felony is that of misprision of felony.®
The law permits the compromise of an offence, though made the subject of a
criminal prosecution, for which the injured party might recover damages in an
action; but if the offence be of a public nature, no agreement can be valid that ia
founded on the consideration of stifling a prosecution of it.® A note given in settle-
1125S. & R. 220. 52 Penn. St. 243. 3 Cr. C. 9 Hawk. P. 0. b. 1, ch. 50, $7.
C. 618, 620. 10 Thid. 2 5.
2128. &R. 220. 1 2 Wils. 341.
8 Purd. 560. 1299 Penn. St.116. 97 Ibid. 361. 90 Ibid. 49.
440. H. Rec. 176. 2 Luz. L. Reg. 170. 17 W. N.C. 67.
5 Ibid. 174, Com. v. Delaney, Mayor’s Court, 18 1 Wood. 428. See 93 Penn. St. 251.
Phila., 23 Oct. 1829 MS. 14 4 Bl. Com. 136.
6 Act 31 March 1860 3 10. Purd. 483. 1 Rose. Or. Evid. 311.
71 Sm. 123, ie 28 Vt. 309. 5 Am. L. Reg. 420. 43 Leg. Int
8 Report on the Penal Code, 13.
CONCEALED WEAPONS. 971
ment of a prosecution for obtaining money by false pretences, is valid and binding;
it is competent for the prosecutor to compound such offence, which is but a misde-
meanor.’ So, of a prosecution for assault and battery.?
In all cases where a person shall, on the complaint of another, be bound by
recognisance to appear, or shall, for want of security, be committed, or shall be
indicted for an assault and battery or other misdemeanor, to the injury and damage
of the party complaining, and not charged to have been done with intent to
commit a felony, or not being an infamous crime,’ and for which there shall also be
a remedy by action, if the party complaining shall appear before the magistrate
who may have taken recognisance or made the commitment, or before the court in
which the indictment shall be, and acknowledge to have received satisfaction for
such injury and damage, it shall be lawful for the magistrate, in his discretion, to
discharge the recognisance which may have been taken for the appearance of the
defendant, or in case of committal, to discharge the prisoner, or for the court also,
where such proceeding has been returned to the court, in their discretion, to order
a nolle prosequi to be entered on the indictment, as the case may require, upon
payment of costs: Provided, That this act shall not extend to any assault and
battery, or other misdemeanor, committed by or on any officer or minister of justice.*
Concealed Weapons.
Aot 18 Marca 1875. Purd. 483.
ANY person within this commonwealth who shall carry any fire-arms, slung-shot,
handy-billy, dirk-knife, razor or any other deadly weapon, concealed upon his person,
with the intent therewith unlawfully and maliciously to do injury to any other
person, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor; and upon the conviction thereof,
shall be sentenced to pay a fine, not exceeding five hundred dollart, and undergo
an imprisonment, by separate or solitary confinement, not exceeding one year, or
either or both, at the discretion of the court; and the jury trying the case may
infer such intent as aforesaid, from the fact of the said defendant carrying such
weapons in the manner as aforesaid.®
The act of 3d May 1850, for establishing a uniform system of police in Philadel-
phia, provides that when any persons, to the number of twelve or more, shall be
therein unlawfully, riotously and tumultuously assembled, and shall refuse to dis-
perse, after proclamation made, they shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and,
on conviction, sentenced to solitary confinement at hard labor in the county prison
for not less than one month, nor more than two years; and that any person arrested,
upon whose person, or in whose possession, shall be found fire-arms, or any other
deadly weapon, shall be deemed guilty of an intention to riot, whether said fire-arms
or deadly weapon shall be used or not, unless the contrary can be satisfactorily
established, and punished accordingly.® : :
It has been ruled by the court of quarter sessions of Philadelphia, that this act
is unconstitutional, so far as it applies to the carrying of arms for self-defence; and
that it is competent for the accused to rebut the unlawful intent raised by the statu-
tory provision.’ But it is hard to understand, how it is, that a party who is in the
exercise of an admitted constitutional right, can be called upon to prove, affirma-
tively, that he had no unlawful intent in so doing. The true idea appears to have
been that laid down by the supreme court of Georgia, to wit, that although such acts
may be valid: yet, if they cut off the exercise of the right of the citizen to bear
arms, altogether, or, under color of prescribing the mode, render the right itself
useless, they are unconstitutional and void.® And it is to be remembered, that if the
theory of Judge Woods be a sound one, the right to bear arms is among those secured
to the citizens of the United States, by the 14th amendment to the constitution?
116 W. N.C. 222. 1 Leg. Gaz. R. 76. 5 This act is constitutional. 77 Penn. St. 470.
21 Phila. 26. 1 Luz. L. Obs. 58. See 100 6 Purd. 483, note e.
Penn. St. 561. 92 Ibid. 241. ‘7 § Phila. 610.
8 See ante 32, note 7. 8 1 Kelly 243. |
£ Act 31 March 1860 29. Purd. 547 9 13 Int. R. Rec. 181. See 116 U.S. 252.
[ 272)
Conspiracy,
[See Mucuanios’ Unions. ]
I. Provisions of the Penal Code. II. Judicial decisions.
L Aor 31 Marce 1860. Purd. 483.
Sror. 127. If any two or more persons shall conspire or agree, falsely and mali-
ciously, to charge or indict any other person, or cause or procure him to be charged.
or indicted, in any court of criminal jurisdiction, the person so offending shall be
guilty of a misdemeanor, and on conviction be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding
one thousand dollars, and to undergo an imprisonment, either at labor by separate
or solitary confinement, or to simple imprisonment, not exceeding three years, at
the discretion of the court.
Sxor. 128. If any two or more persons shall falsely and maliciously conspire, and
agree to cheat and defraud any person, or body corporate, of his or their moneys,
goods, chattels or other property, or to do any other dishonest, malicious and un-
lawful act, to the prejudice of another, they shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and,
on conviction, be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars, and to
undergo an imprisonment, by separate or solitary confinement at labor, or by simple
imprisonment, not exceeding two years.
Aot 14 June 1872. Purd. 484.
Scr. 1. It shall be lawful for any laborer or laborers, workingman or working-
men, journeyman or journeymen, acting either as individuals or as the member of
- any club, society or association, to refuse to work or labor for any person or persons,
whenever, in his, her or their opinion, the wages paid are insufficient, or the treat-
ment of such laborer or laborers, workingman or workingmen, journeyman or
journeymen, by his, her or their employer is brutal or offensive, or the continued
labor by such laborer or laborers, workingman or workingmen, journeyman or
journeymen, would be contrary to the rules, regulations, or by-laws of any club,
society or organization to which he, she or they might belong, without subjecting
any person or persons, so refusing to work or labor, to prosecution or indictment for
conspiracy under the criminal laws of this commonwealth: Provided, That this act
shall not be held to apply to the member or members of any club, society or
organization, the constitution, by-laws, rules and regulations of which are not in
strict conformity to the constitution of the state of Pennsylvania, and to the con-
stitution of the United States: Provided, That nothing herein contained shall
prevent the prosecution and punishment, under existing laws, of any person
or persons who shall, in any way, hinder persons who desire to labor for their
employers from so doing, or other persons from being employed as laborers.
II. The offence of conspiracy, according to all the authorities, consists, not in the
accomplishment of any unlawful or injurious purpose, nor in any one act moving
towards that purpose ; but in the actual concert and agreement of two or more
persons to effect something, which being so concerted and agreed, the law regards
as the object of an indictable conspiracy.? The gist of a conspiracy is the unlawful
confederacy to do an unlawful act, or a lawful act for an unlawful purpose. And
the offence is complete when the confederacy is made.®
1 The act 20 April 1876, Purd. 2017, provides
that this proviso shall be so construed that the
use of lawful or peaceful means, having for their
object a lawful purpose, shall not be regarded as
“in any way hindering” persons who desire to
labor; and that the use of force, threat or menace
of harm to persons or property shall alone be
regarded as in any way hindering persons who
desire to labor for their employers from so duing
or other porsons being employed as laborers See
15 Phila. 393.
2 Whart. Cr. L. 2 2291 n.
8 96 Penn. St. 56,
3 Pitts. 143.
2 Pars. 341.
2 Pars. 341. 12 Phila. 580.
2 Mass, 337.
CONSPIRACY. 273
All who accede to a conspiracy, after it is formed, and while it is in execution,
and all who, With knowledge of the facts, concur in the plans originally formed,
and aid in executing them, are fellow-conspirators. Their concurrence, without
proof of an agreement to concur, is conclusive against them. They commit an
offence when they become parties to the transaction, or further the original plan.’
A combination is a conspiracy in law, whenever the act to be done has a neces-
sary tendency to prejudice the public, or oppress individuals, by unjustly subjecting
them to the power of the confederates, and giving effect to the purposes of the latter,
whether of extortion or mischief. Every association, therefore, is criminal, whose
object is to raise or depress the price of labor beyond what it would bring if it were
left without artificial excitement.?
A confederacy to assist a female infant to escape from her father’s control, with
a view to marry her against his will, or to seduce her, is indictable at common law.®
-A conspiracy to publish a libel, or to defame by spoken words not actionable, would
be equally a subject of prosecution by indictment.* A conspiracy to commit an
assault and battery is indictable ;> so is a conspiracy to cheat and defraud.® A
conspiracy entered into to induce and procure others to do an act prohibited, under
a penalty, by statute, is an indictable offence, whether the object were effected or
not.’ All conspiracies to injure others, by preventing, obstructing or defeating the
course of public justice, by fabricating or suppressing evidence, are indictable.®
A conspiracy is in its nature a joint offence; Jess than two persons cannot be
accused of it ; and where this offence is charged, the court cannot award a separate
trial.2 A man and his wife, being in law but one person, cannot be convicted of
the same conspiracy, unless other parties are charged.” The wife of one conspirator
is not a competent witness either for or against the others." But an indictment will
lie against one of two conspirators.”
An indictment lies for any conspiracy to vex or annoy another—for instance, to
hiss a play or an actor, right or wrong.” To constitute a conspiracy, the purpose
to be effected by it must be unlawful, either in respect of its nature, or in respect
of the means to be employed for its accomplishment; and the intended act, where
it has not a common-law name to import its nature, must, in order to show its
illegality, be set forth in the indictment.“
Where concert is part of a criminal act, it is not the subject of indictment as a
‘conspiracy to commit the act. There is no such offence as a conspiracy between
a man and a woman to commit adultery.
Parties may be indicted for a common-law conspiracy, notwithstanding the statute.®
The offence of conspiracy to commit a misdemeanor is not merged in the commission
of the offence.”
A combination among workmen, to compel another to employ a particular class,
and to drive away all others, is a criminal conspiracy.* But a combination not to
work, except at certain prices, is not indictable, so long as the parties do not
attempt to coerce others.®
8 2 Tiill 282.
1 4 Wend. 259. Bright. 143. 1 Greenl. Evid.
111, 282. 2 Ibid. 3 90.
2 Whart. Cr. L. 92291 n. 1 Journ. Juris. 225,
Bright. 36. 2 Pars. 59. And see 68 Penn. St.
173, 1 Brewst. 511. 15 Leg. Int. 268.
35 W.&S. 461. 5 Rand. 627. 3 Burr. 1434,
* 8 Penn..St. 239, per Gibson, 0. J. 3L Law
Rev, 150.
5 29 Ibid. 296.
6 15 Ibid. 272. 2 Clark 297.
7 23-Ibid. 355. See 2 Del. Co. R. 449; which
a affirmed by a divided court, in 17 W. N. 0.
18
9 2 Ash. 81. 8 Phila. 380.
10 15 Leg. Int. 268, Whart. Cr. L. 3 2343.
11 2 Ash. 31.
12 91 Penn. St. 145.
13 2 Camp. 369. 8 Penn. St. 240, per Gibson,
C.J.
14 5 Penn. St. 65.
16 14 Ibid. 226.
1 96 Ibid. 56.
17:1 Gr. 224, 2 Pars. 341.
18 3 Pitts. 143.
19 Lewis’ Cr. L. 626. See 15 Phila. 393,
[ 274 ]
e
Constables.
I. Of their antiquity and general duties. VI. Duties in regard to elections.
II. Of their election and qualification. VII. Actions against constables.
III. Appointment of deputies. VIII. Miscellaneous provisions.
IV. Removal for misconduct, é&c. IX. Forms of process.
V. Duties and liabilities in civil cases.
I, OF THE ANTIQUITY AND GENERAL DUTIES OF CONSTABLES.
Ir the great antiquity of the office, or the extensive powers intrusted to him whe
exercises it, could inspire men faithfully, and with a single eye to the public weal,
to discharge the duties of any office, then would the duties of the office of con-
stable be certainly discharged with uprightness, and a conscientious determination
to command public respect and confidence, All the old English law-books are full
of the early appointment and confidence reposed in this officer. So entirely is the
origin of the office lost in the mists of antiquity, that the learned, who delight in
devoting themselves to such inquiries, have been unable to determine whether the
origin of the word constable was to be ascribed to the Saxon language, or to that
of the eastern empire. The later writers incline to the latter opinion. Which of
them, or whether either of them, is right, is, comparatively to ascertaining the
rights and duties of the office, a matter of little moment. He is acknowledged by
the law to be “one of the most ancient officers in the realm for the conservation
of the peace.’
Lord Bacon observes, that though the high constable’s authority hath the more
ample circuit, ‘yet I do not find,” says he, ‘‘ that the petty constable is subordinate
to the high constable, or to be ordered or commanded by him.” ‘The original and
proper authority of a high constable, as such, seems to be,” says Burns, “ the very
same and no other, within his hundred, as that of the petty constable within his vill
(village), and therein, most probably, he is coeval with the petty constable.” “ Every
high and petty constable are, by the common law, conservators of the peace.’
He may arrest any person without a warrant who shall make an affray or assault
upon another, in the presence of the constable: and if it be inconvenient to take
him before a justice, he may take him to prison until he shall find surety of the
peace. But he may not arrest any man, on the complaint of another, without he
has a warrant. In the discharge of these highly responsible duties, the con-
stable should be especially careful never to permit his feelings to be enlisted, or
his passion aroused. Let him so conduct himself that every sensible bystander
shall be disposed to take part with him, and he may be sure that he is faithfully
discharging his duty.
It is no inconsiderable evidence of the confidence and authority reposed ina
constable, that “if he shall be assaulted in the execution of his office, he need not
go back to the wall, as private persons are bound to do; and, if in the striving
together the constable kills the assailant, it is no felony; but if the constable is
killed, it shall be considered premeditated murder.”® The necessity of a constable
being temperate in all his habits, is manifest from the power reposed in him. A
habit of drunkenness from liquor, or passion, should disqualify any man from being
elected constable. The peace and safety of the community are greatly endangered
when committed to the care of a constable of quick temper, violent passions, or
habits of intoxication, In this commonwealth, where the people elect the constable
from among themselves, the election of such a constable is a reproach to the whole
community. Every man, woman and child, in the district, is interested in the
election of an honest, active and conscientious man as constable, ‘He should be
honest to execute his office truly, without malice, affection or partiality—he should
have knowledge to know what he ought to do, and ability, as well in estate as body,
that he may intend and execute his office, when need is, diligently, and not for
1 4 Inst. 265. 22 Hawk. P. C. b. 2,0.8, 36, Dalt, ch. 1. * Hale H.P. C, 37.
CONSTABLES. 975
impotence or poverty neglect it.” Aged persons, incapable by weakness, should
never be elected to do the duties of this arduous office.
In Pennsylvania, the constable exercises all the common-law rights and privileges
which that officer exercises in England, except, which is very rare, where they have
been modified by our constitution or laws. In addition, constables in Pennsylvania
have many civil duties imposed upon them by acts of assembly, which are unknown
to such officers in England. The sheriff is the executive officer of the courts
where he attends, so is the constable the executive officer of the alderman or justice
of the peace where he attends. He is bound to serve all legal process which the
magistrate shall issue, and he is punishable if he do not serve it, unless he be able
to show that he was otherwise officially engaged at the time he was called upon to
execute the process.
In case of resistance by a defendant to a constable, in the execution of civil
process issued by a justice of the peace, he has the same power as the sheriff to
raise the power of the county for his assistance. There is as much reason why
constables, in enforcing the law, should be invested with the power necessary to
put down resistance and preserve the peace, as there can be in the case of sheriffs.
Acquiescence in the laws is the duty of every citizen; and in a government of
laws, such as ours emphatically is, it is the duty of every citizen to aid in their
execution. If a person refuse to assist the constable, when required, on resistance
being made, he is indictable for such refusal?
II. ELEcTION AND QUALIFICATION OF CONSTABLES.
Each of the electors of each borough, ward and township shall annually vote for
only so many candidates for the office of constable as there shall be persons required
to fill said office, in their respective boroughs, wards or townships ; the candidates
receiving the highest number of votes shall be declared elected.’
All elections for city, ward, borough and township officers, for regular terms of
service, shall be held on the third Tuesday of February? No person shall be
eligible to any township office, unless he be an elector of the township for which he
shall be chosen.*
The acting constable in every ward, town, township or district in this common-
wealth shall, within six days after the election for a constable or constables has been.
held, give notice in writing, to the person or persons who shall be chosen, of his or
their election to the said office; and if such acting constable shall neglect so to do,
he shall forfeit to the commonwealth the penalty of sixty dollars’
Tt shall be the duty of every person elected to the office of constable in any town-
.ship, to appear on the first day of next court of quarter sessions of the same county,
to accept or decline such office; and if any person so elected and duly notified
thereof, shall neglect or refuse so to appear, he shall forfeit to the township the
sum of forty dollars, to be levied by order of the court.®
The court to which a return as aforesaid shall be made, shall appoint the person
returned to be constable of the township for the term of one year from the date of
his appointment, and until a successor shall be duly appointed, if it shall appear to
the satisfaction of the court that he possesses a freehold estate in his own right,
clear of all incumbrances, of the value of at least one thousand dollars, or if he
does not possess such freehold estate, he shall give bond with at least one suffi-
cient surety, to be approved of by the court, in the sum and manner hereinafter
directed."
If the electors of any township shall fail to elect a person for the said office, or if
the person returned should be incompetent with respect to estate or unable to give
15 Whart. 437, 440,
2 Act 9 April 1849 2 3. Purd. 372. In Phila-
delphia, constables are to be elected for five
years by act 18 March 1864. Purd. 372, note q.
The term is fixed at three years by acts 14
February 1889 and 4 May 1889, Purd. 373.
3 Const. art. VIII. 23. See 3 W. N. C. 477.
4 Act 15 April 1834 3 84. Purd. 1638.
5 Act 1 March 1799 2 6. Purd. 373. The act
2 July 1839 2 54, provides that it shall be the
duty of the inspectors and judge to make out a
certificate of the election of each township offi-
cer, which shall be signed by them and deliv-
ered to the constable of the proper ward, district
or township, and by him delivered to the said
officer or left at his usual place of abode, within
six days thereafter.
6 Act 15 April 1834 3 107. Purd. 373.
T Ibid. 2 108.
276 OONSTABLES.
the required security, or should refuse to take upon themselves the said office, or
in the event of a vacancy in the office, by death or otherwise, it shall be the duty
of the said court to appoint some other respectable person possessing a freehold
estate of the value aforesaid, or who shall give the security required, to serve as
constable until the next annual election, and until a successor be duly appointed."
If any person who shall be duly elected and appointed a constable, or who shall
be appointed as such by the court, in the cases hereinbefore mentioned, and who
shall possess a freehold estate of the value aforesaid, shall refuse or neglect to take
upon himself the said office, or shall not procure a deputy to undertake the duties
thereof, he shall be fined by the court in the sum of forty dollars, for the use of the
proper township.? Provided, That no person shall be liable to the penalty aforesaid,
who shall have served personally, or by deputy, in the office of constable of the same
township, within fifteen years of his said election or appointment, or having been
elected or appointed within that period shall have paid the penalty aforesaid.’
The bond to be given by a constable shall be in such sum, not less than five
hundred dollars, nor more than three thousand dollars, as the court shall direct, and
shall be taken by the clerk of the court, in the name of the commonwealth, with
conditions for the just and faithful discharge by the said constable of the duties of
his office; and such bond shall be held in trust for the use and benefit of all persons
who may sustain injury from him in his official capacity, by reason of neglect of
duty, and for the like purposes and uses as sheriff’s bonds are given and held.‘
Suits against the sureties mentioned in the 3d section of this act shall not be
sustained, unless the same be instituted within three years after the date of such
obligation.®
In every case in which any pecuniary penalty or forfeiture is imposed by this act,
the proceedings for the recovery of the same shall be by indictment in the court of
quarter sessions of the proper county, or to be recovered as debts of equivalent amount
are by law recoverable, unless herein otherwise specially provided: Provided always,
That aldermen or justices of the peace shall not have jurisdiction of any suit or
action, for the recovery of any penalty imposed by this act for official misconduct,
and that such suit or action, when brought in the court of common pleas of the
proper county, shall have a preference for trial over all other actions.®
Nothing in this act contained shall be so construed as to repeal any special pro-
vision heretofore made by law, for any city, borough, district or township in this
commonwealth.”
A constable is not required by the act of 1834, to file a copy of his official oath
with the town clerk. The court will not refuse to commission a constable elected.
by the people, on the ground of immorality, and an act of extortion in a former
term?
Ifa constable’s bond be found among the records of the office, in its proper
place, though no entry of the approval and filing of it be shown, it will be presumed.”
The bond may be amended, in case of error apparent on its face. The sureties
cannot take advantage of a neglect to swear the constable, or to approve his bond."
A condition that the constable shall “ execute all writs and process to him directed,”
is not greater than required by law.® The sureties are not responsible for an exe-
cution delivered to their principal by another officer; to charge them, it must be
delivered to him, in his official character, by the justice.* The sureties are liable
for the act of the officer in levying upon the goods of astranger ; for money collected
under a distress-warrant ;© and for money collected under a warrant against a
constable of an adjoining township.” But they are not liable for his refusal to
execute process which he was not bound to accept.!® A party aggrieved may either
1 Act 15 April 1834 3109. Purd. 373, 8 1 Bro, 349,
; Ibid. 2 110. 10 7 Penn. St. 241. See2S.& R. 420.
Thid. ¢ 111. 1 1W. N.C. 326. Ibid, 533.
4 Ibid. ¢ 112. 12-7 Penn. St. 240,
5 Act 29 March 1824 3 4, Purd. 374, This 13 Ibid.
section is still in foree. 33 Penn. St. 199. 66 4 2 Ibid. 49.
Thid. 172, 2 W.N. 0. 321, 1 5 Binn. 184. 6 W. & S. 513,
6 Act 15 ae 1834 3115. Purd. 374. 16 2 Clark 393.
7 Ibid. 2 116. 78. & R. 349.
S6W. 4&5. 513. 18 106 Penn. St. 643.
CONSTABLES, 277
sue on the bond or proceed under the 19th section of the act of 18101 A judg-
ment against the constable for official misconduct, is conclusive against the sureties
- as to the misconduct and the extent of the damage -? but they may take advantage
of any defence personal to themselves.
III. APPOINTMENT OF DEPUTIES.
No deputy shall be appointed by any constable, either by general or partial depu-
tation, without the approbation of the court of quarter sessions of the proper county
first had and obtained, except the same be made specially, in some civil suit or
proceeding, at the request and risk of the plaintiff or his agent.
In the event of the death, inability or refusal to act of his deputy, the constable
of any township may, with the approbation of any one of the judges of the court of
quarter sessions of the same county, appoint another deputy, with full authority
to act as such, until the next regular sessions of such court, and, for the acts of
such deputy, the constable and his sureties shall be liable as in other cases ; and in
every such case, the constable shall file a written copy of such deputation in the
office of the clerk of the court of quarter sessions of such county.
A constable who has appointed a deputy, is still capable to act and execute pro-
cess© The court will not appoint a deputy constable, when the constable elect is
able to attend to the duties of his ward.’ A general deputy of a constable, when
so appointed, can execute all process. A constable would be liable for the mis-
feasance of a deputy who derived his authority from a special deputation made by
his deputy ; but one who employs a special constable, deputed at his own instance,
must bear the consequences of his misfeasance, as of any other servant employed
by him. To justify the court in sustaining as regular the service of a summons
directed generally by the deputy of one calling himself merely a constable, he must
appear before the justice to make his return, and identify his official character by.
the production of his deputation.’
1V. REMOVAL FOR MISCONDUCT, ETC. j
The courts of quarter sessions of each county shall have full power, on petition
of any surety of any constable, setting forth the complaint, and verified by affidavit,
to inquire into official conduct of such constable, and in all cases where said court
shall be satisfied that, from habits of intemperance or neglect of duty, any con-
stable is unfit and incompetent to discharge his official duties, it shall be lawful for
said courts, respectively, to decree the removal of such constable from office, unless
such constable gives such additional surety as the court may direct, and to appoint
a suitable person to fill the vacancy who shall have a freehold estate worth at least
one thousand dollars beyond incumbrance, or give security, as in other cases of
constables, to continue in office until the next succeeding election for constable,
and until a successor be duly qualified ; and in all cases where any constable, elected
or appointed, shall not have given sccurity, and has so neglected his business, or
the situation of his estate is such as to render it unsafe to intrust him with the
execution of official duties, the said.courts shall also have power to require such
constable to give security in the same sum and in the same manner required by
law from other constables who have not such estate as exempts them from giving
security, and such security thus given shall be for the same uses and as valid in law
as the security given by said other constables, and in default of giving such security
within such time as the said court shall adjudge reasonable, said court shall decree
the removal of such constable from office, and fill the vacancy in the same manner
as is provided herein for cases of constables incompetent to act from habits of
intemperance.
168. & R.245, 8 Ibid. 414. 3 W.208. 4 63 P. & W. 236
Ibid. 217. 7 11 Phila. 391
2178. & R. 354. 8 W. 398. 5 Whart. 144. 83D. & W. 236
7 Penn. St. 240. 9 9 W. 430.
8 17S. & RB. 354, 10 3 Luz. L. Reg. 111.
4 Act 15 April 1834 2 113. Purd. 374, 11 Act 27 May 1841 3 14, Purd. 375.
5 Ibid. 2 114.
278 CONSTABLES.
V. THEIR DUTIES AND LIABILITIES IN CIVIL CASES.
Every justice of the peace rendering judgment as aforesaid, shall receive the
amount of the judgment, if offered by the defendant or his agent, before execution,
and pay the same over to the plaintiff or his agent when required ; for which service
he shall, if exceeding five dollars and thirty-three cents, he allowed [twenty-five
cents] by the defendant, in addition to his usual fees:' and if the said justice shall
neglect or refuse to pay over on demand the money so received, to the plaintiff or
his agent, such neglect or refusal shall be a misdemeanor in office; and if the
amount of the judgment is not paid to the justice as aforesaid, he shall grant execu-
tion, if required by the plaintiff or his agent, thereupon, if for a sum not exceeding
five dollars and thirty-three cents, forthwith, and for any further sum, after the
time limited for the stay of the same ; which execution shall be directed to the con-
stable of the ward, district or township where the defendant resides, or the next
constable most convenient to the defendant, commanding him to levy the debt or
demand, and costs, on the defendant’s goods and chattels; and by virtue thereof
shall within the space of twenty days next following, expose the same to sale, by
public vendue, having given due notice of the same by at least three advertisements,
put up at the most public places in his township, ward or district, returning the
overplus, if any, to the defendant ; [and for want of sufficient distress, to take the
body of such defendant into custody, and him or her convey to the common jail of
the county ; and the sheriff or keeper of such jail is hereby directed to receive the
person or persons so taken in execution, and him, her or them safely keep, until
the sum recovered and interest thereon accrued from the date of the judgment,
together with costs, be fully paid, and in default of such keeping to be liable to
answer the damage to the party injured, as is by law provided in cases of escapes ;?]
or in case no goods and chattels can be found, and the defendant be possessed of
lands or tenements, the plaintiff may waive imprisoning the defendant, and proceed
by a transcript to the prothonotary aforesaid: Provided, That executions against
executors or administrators shall only be for the assets of the deceased.
In all cases where a constable levies an execution issued from a justice of the
peace, he shall indorse the goods or chattels so levied on the execution or schedule
thereto annexed, which levy shall be a lien on such chattels for twenty days after
levying the same, and no longer; and the constable making such levy is hereby
authorized and empowered to take a bail-bond in the following or like words, viz.:
“« We, A. B. and C. D., or either of us, are held and firmly bound unto E. F., con-
stable, in the sum of , upon condition that the said A. B. shall deliver unto E. F.
aforesaid the following goods and chattels , on the day of , at the
house of , which is taken in execution at the suit of G. H. against A. B., or pay
the amount of the said execution with costs. Witness our hands and seals this
day of -’ But if the said defendant shall not deliver the chattels so specified
in such bond, or pay the amount of such execution, the constable may then pro-
ceed to the sale of such goods or chattels so levied, provided, the lien created by
such levy be not expired; but should the lien be expired, the justice may issue
an alias execution, which may be proceeded on as aforesaid ; or the constable taking
such bond may assign it to the plaintiff, who may recover the same before any
justice of the peace, without stay of execution: Provided always, That any con-
stable taking such bail shall be accountable to the plaintiff for the sufficiency
thereof, notwithstanding such assignment.*
Whenever a constable shall levy on the goods and chattels of a defendant as is
directed by the 11th section of the act to which this is a supplement, he shall
indorse the time of such levy on the execution; and no execution issued by
a justice of the peace shall be a lien on the proverty of the defendant, before levy
made thereon.®
In all cases where any constable shall collect or receive the debt, interest and
costs, or any part thereof of any execution, it shall be his duty to make out and
deliver to the defendant or defendants in such execution a bill of particulars of
1 For the fees allowed for this service, by the of contract.
present fee bills, see ante p. 127, note 8. 3 Act 20 March 1810 211. Purd. 375.
2 Since the act to abolish imprisonment for debt, * Ibid. 2 18.
no execution can issue against the body, in cases 5 Act 28 March 1820 24. Purd. 376.
CONSTABLES. © j 279
his fees and charges, together with a recoipt, signed by him for the same, if paid;
and if any constable shall neglect or refuse, upon application to him made by the
party interested, to give such bill or receipt, he shall, for such neglect or refusal,
forfeit and pay the sum of ten dollars, to be recovered in the manner and for the
use prescribed in the act to which this is a supplement,
On the delivery of an execution to any constable, an account shall be stated in
the docket of the justice, and also on the back of the execution, of the debt, interest
and costs; from which the said constable shall not be discharged, but hy producing
to the justice, on or before the return-day of the execution, the receipt of the
plaintiff, or such other return as may be sufficient in law; and in case of a false
return, or in case he does not produce the plaintiffs receipt, on the return-day, or
make such other return as may be deemed sufficient by the justice, he shall issue
a summons directed for service to a constable, or to some other fit person who shall
consent to serve the same, and having so consented, by accepting of such process,
shall be bound to execute the same, under a penalty of twenty dollars, to be recovered
as other fines are recoverable by this act; but should not a constable, or other fit
perso’ conveniently be found to serve the process as aforesaid, the justice shall
dire . it to a supervisor of the highways of the township, ward or district where
sur . constable resides, whose duty it shall be to serve the same, under the penalty
a’ ,resaid—commanding the constable to appear before him on such day as shall
. 2 mentioned in the said summons, not exceeding eight days from the date thereof,
and then and there show cause why an execution should not issue against him for
the amount of the first above-mentioned execution ; and if the said constable either
neglects to appear, on the day mentioned in such summons, or does not show
sufficient cause why the execution should not issue against him, then the justice
shall enter judgment against such constable, for the amount of the first above-men-
tioned execution, together with costs, on which judgment there shall be no stay of
execution; and upon application of the plaintiff or his agent, the said justice shall
issue an execution against the constable for the amount of such judgment, which
execution may be directed to any constable of the county, or other fit person accept-
ing thereof, or to a supervisor, as aforesaid, whose duty it shall be to execute the
same: Provded always, That nothing in this act contained shall in any manner
impair or alter the proceeding as heretofore established with regard to insolvent
debtors, and their discharge on a full surrender of their property.’
So much of the act entitled “an act to amend and consolidate with its supple-
ments, the act entitled ‘an act for the recovery of debts and demands not exceeding
one hundred dollars before a justice of the peace, and for the election of constables,
and for other purposes,’” passed the 20th of March 1810, as provides that the jus-
tice shall enter judgment against a constable for the amount of an execution,
together with costs, on which judgment there shall be no stay of execution, shall
not be construed to deprive the constable of the right of appeal* to the court of
common pleas of the proper county, upon such conditions and under like limitations,
as in the case of other defendants.‘
In all cases where judgment shall be rendered by an alderman or justice of the
peace, against any constable in this commonwealth, under the 12th section of the act
to which this is a further supplement, in addition to the remedies provided by the
existing laws, it shall be lawful for the plaintiff or plaintiffs, his, her or their legal
representatives, to take out a transcript of such judgment, and file the same in the
office of the prothonotary of the court of common pleas of the proper county ; and
it shall be the duty of the prothonotary,® at the request of such plaintiff or plaintiffs,
to issue a fieri facias or capias ad satisfaciendum, against such constable, to be
proceeded in as in other cases; or the said plaintiffs may apply to the court of com-
mon pleas, who shall have power to issue an attachment against such constable :
Provided, That such proceedings shall in no case be decmed or construed to exon-
erate the surety or sureties of such constable.®
Where any constable shall refuse or neglect to pay over to the defendant ot
1 Act 28 March 1820 3 3. Purd. 376. 4 Act 13 October 1840 3 12. Purd. 377.
2 Act 20 March 1810 3 12. Purd. 376. 5 A previous execution by the justice is not
3 The plaintiff as well as the constable is enti- necessary. 3 W. 278.
tled to an appeal. 4 W. & S. 278. , 6 Act 29 March 1824 2 2. Purd. 377.
280 CONSTABLES.
defendants, his or their agent or legal representatives, the overplus money which he
or his deputy may have made or received upon any execution or executions, then
and in such case the party or parties aggrieved, may apply to the alderman or justice
of the peace who issued the process, who shall thereupon proceed against such con-
stable in the manner prescribed by the 12th section of the act to which this isa
supplement, in cases where the constable makes a false return, or neglects to return
the execution; and if upon such proceedings, the justice shall receive the overplus
money, or if it shall be voluntarily paid to him at any time by the constable, he shall,
in either case, pay over the same to the defendant or defendants, or his or their agent
or legal representatives, without any fee for making such payment.’
If any constable shall receive money by virtue of an execution or other process,
and shall neglect or refuse, upon application to him made by the party interested,
to pay the amount thereof to the party entitled to receive the same, or to his,
her or their agent or legal representatives, he shall be deemed guilty of a misde-
meanor in office, and upon conviction thereof in the court of general quarter
sessions of the peace of the proper county, he shall be sentenced to pay, at the dis-
cretion of the court, a fine of not less than twenty dollars, nor exceeding one
hundred dollars, and shall stand committed until the money so withheld shall be
paid, together with the interest, fine and costs; and moreover, shall, for seven years
thereafter, be incapable of holding the office of constable, or the appointment of
deputy-constable.’
Any constable who has or may hereafter give security agreeable to law for the
faithful performance of the duties of his office, and afterwards, on neglecting or
refusing to perform such duties, shall have judgment rendered against him for such
neglect or refusal, and on being prosecuted for the recovery of such judgment,
becomes insolvent,’ abandons his country, or from any other reason it becomes
impracticable for such judgment or judgments to be recovered from such constable
as aforesaid, or where a constable makes such default, and abandons his country
before judgments are had against him, then, and in such cases only, the justice* before
whom the judgment or judgments stand unpaid, shall be, and is hereby authorized
and empowered to issue a scire facias, and proceed against such bail,® for the recovery
of judgments had as aforesaid, in the manner that constables are now suable, saving
only the right of appeal to such sureties.®
Tn all cases where any constable has been or shall be intrusted with the execution
of any process, for the collection of money, and by neglect of duty has failed or shall
fail to collect the same, by means whereof the bail or security for such constable
shall be compelled to pay the amount of any judgment or judgments; such pay-
ment shall vest in the person or persons paying as aforesaid, the equitable interest
in such judgment or judgments, and the amount due upon any such judgment
or judgments may be collected, in the name of the plaintiff or plaintiffs, for the use of
such person or persons."
Tt shall not be lawful for any deputy-constable, or any person or persons at his
direction or request, and for his use, either directly or indirectly, to purchase any
goods, wares or merchandise taken in execution and sold by the principal of such
deputy-constable ; nor shall it be lawful for any constable, or for any person, at his
request and for his use, in any township, city or district in which there are more
constables than one, to purchase any goods, wares or merchandise taken in execution
and sold by any other constable within such township, city or district; and if any
constable, deputy-constable or other person shall be convicted before the justices of
the court of general quarter sessions of the peace of offending against or violating
any of the provisions of this section, he, she or they so offending, upon conviction
1 Act 28 March 1820 2 2. Purd. 377.
2 Ibid. 3 7.
8 His insolvency may bo established by parol
evidence. 7 W. 292. 8 Ibid. 398, Tho law, in
such case, requires no higher standard of diligence
than the ordinary application of its own process.
29 Penn. St.176. Buta return of nulla bona, to
an execution issued by the justice, is not, in itself,
sufficient evidence of insolvency, as he may havo
real estate. 7 W. 293. 30 Penn. St. 210.
4 The jurisdiction of justices, under this sec-
tion, is not taken away by the acts giving juris-
diction to the common pleas in suits on constables’
bonds. 6S. & R. 245. 8 Ibid, 414. 3 W. 208.
4 [bid. 217.
5 Tho constable need not be joined. 3 W. 208.
6 Aot 20 March 1810 3 19. Purd. 377.
T Act 23 April 1829 3 3. Purd. 378. The con-
stable who, through neglect of duty, becomes
liable for, and is compelled to pay the amount
of an execution, has no such right. 6 W. 228
7 Ibid. 353.
CONSTABLES. 281
thereof, shall forfeit and pay, at the discretion of the court, any sum not less than
twenty dollars nor exceeding one hundred dollars, the one-half whereof shall be
paid to the person informing, and the other half to the use of this commonwealth,
and moreover, shall for seven years thereafter be incapable of holding the office of
constable or the appointment of deputy-constable.’
No sheriff, constable or other officer shall sell or dispose of, by way of vendue,
at any place or places, within two miles of the state-house, in the city of Philadel-
phia, or within the chartered limits of the city of Pittsburgh, any lands, tenements,
goods or chattels, other than such as are taken in execution and liable to be sold
by order of law, or distrained for rent in arrears ; and if any sheriff or constable or
other officer fraudulently or wilfully violate or evade this provision of this act, it
shall be deemed to be a misdemeanor in office, for which the offender may be prose-
cuted by indictment, in any court of competent jurisdiction.’
Tn all suits which may hereafter be instituted in any court of this commonwealth,
in which the sheriff of any county may be a party, when there is no coroner in
commission to serve process, it shall be lawful for any constable in the county where
the process has been issued to serve the same, and to perform the duties in relation
ae which coroners are authorized to do under the laws of this common-
wealth.
The same rules of law which govern sheriffs in the execution of process from the
higher courts govern constables in the execution of a justice’s process, except where
some statute intervenes.*
It is the universal practice for justices to issue their warrants and executions to
any constable within the county. And the sureties of such constable are respon-
sible for their due execution.®> A warrant issued to — , constable, if executed
by the proper constable, is good ;® the justice is to judge who is the constable most
convenient to the defendant.’ Buta sale by a constable of one township, under an
execution directed to the constable of another township, passes no title to the pro-
perty; he is a mere trespasser.® And the sureties are only responsible, where the
execution is delivered to him in his official capacity by the justice.® A justice can-
not compel the constable of another ward or township, who is clearly not the
constable most convenient to the defendant, to execute his process; he may decline
to accept it.
A constable’s sale to the plaintiff in the execution, no other person being present,
is illegal and void ;" if he sell any portion of the goods without levy or advertise-
ment, he is liable.” A constable has no right to conduct a sale under an execution
in a public street, to the obstruction of the people; such act is indictable as a public
nuisance® It is his duty to deliver possession to the purchaser, but having done
so, his duty in reference to the goods is at an end.
‘A constable who sells under an execution, after the entry of an appeal, is not a
trespasser; he-is protected by his process, though he had notice of the appeal.’
But if he proceed to sell, after his execution has been revoked by the justice, on
the entry of an appeal, he is a mere trespasser ; and the purchaser takes no title.’
‘A constable’s return to an execution must be in writing.” Of the sufficiency of
the return, the justice must judge in the first instance, but his decision is subject to
review ; and the return must be in writing.” The constable cannot discharge the
defendant from liability, by the settlement of an account of previous money trans-
actions with himself, and passing receipts, no money being actually paid.® The
mere omission to return the execution within twenty days, will not render the con-
stable liable, if he have sufficient cause for the delay.”
1 Act 28 March 1820 2 6. Purd. 378, 10 106 Penn. St. 643. ;
2 Act 1 April 1826 3 7. Ibid. 11 15 Ibid. 50. See 41 Ibid. 185,
3 Act 22 April 1850319. Ibid. The act 12 J Ibid. 238.
19 April 1848 2 2, confers the same powers in all 18138. & R. 403.
cases against the sheriff or his sureties, when there 14 2 Phila. 89.
is no coroner in commission. Purd. 378, note y. 15 76 Penn. St. 44.
4 2 Cow. 421. 16 27 Ibid. 199.
5758. & R. 353-4, 175 W. & 8. 457.
® 6 Binn. 123. 18 Tbid. 8 W. 220. 4 Whart. 56. And seo 1 Ash,
7138. & R. 336. 26,160. 1M. 210.
8 3 Penn. St. 249. 19 2 BR. 199.
8 2 Ibid. 49. 26 W.& S. 534.
282 CONSTABLES.
It is a good defence to a proceeding against the constable, that the judgment was
paid before the execution was issued; but the issuing of a subsequent execution
does not discharge the constable from the liability incurred.’ In an action against
a constable for an insufficient return, it is not competent for him to. prove that the
property levied on did not belong to the defendant in the execution. If he have
reason to doubt about the ownership of it, he may require the plaintiff to indemnify
him ; and if he refuse to sell, not having done so, he becomes liable. The plain-
tiff is not bound to offer an indemnity, before it is required by the officer; nor will
every frivolous objection protect him, as he will be liable for a false return, unless
there was reasonable ground for apprehension that he would be endangered by the
levy and sale If he refuse to receive a bond of indemnity, on the ground that
the security is insufficient, and declare that he will not proceed unless certain per-
sons named by him are given as sureties, this is equivalent to a refusal to execute
the writ, and dispenses with the tender of further security.’ If he have accepted
indemnity from the plaintiff under a claim to the property levied on made by a
third party, he is bound to proceed, and is estopped from showing that the goods
did not belong to the defendant. And where the execution has not been returned
within the time limited, it is incompetent for the constable to prove that the
defendant had no property, or that the defendant’s wife had died the night before
he proceeded to execute the writ, in consequence of which, through feelings of
humanity, he failed to execute it.5 Nor can the constable disobey the execution,
where the justice’s proceedings are irregular : as, where the justice had proceeded by
attachment, without taking a legal bond.®
VI. THEIR DUTIES IN REGARD TO ELECTIONS.
Tt shall be the duty of the constable or constables of each township, ward and
district, at least ten days before the day hereinafter appointed for the election of
inspectors, to give public notice, by six or more printed or written advertisements
affixed at as many of the most public places therein, of the time and place of hold-
ing such election."
The constable or constables of every township within this commonwealth shall
give public notice of the township elections, by ten or more printed or written
advertisements, affixed at as many of the most public places therein, at least ten
days before the election, and in every such advertisement they shall enumerate,
designate and give notice as sheriffs of counties in cases of general elections are
directed by the 1st and 2d divisions of the 13th section of the act to which this is
a supplement :® and in case of the neglect, refusal, death or absence of the afore-
said constable or constables, the duties herein enjoined on them shall be performed
by the supervisors or assessor of the proper township; but said supervisors or
assessor of the proper township shall not be required to give more than five days’
notice; and said elections shall be held and conducted under the regulations not
inconsistent herewith, prescribed in the aforesaid act ; but nothing in this act, or in
the act to which this is a supplement, contained, shall be construed to prohibit
a judge, inspector or clerk of election from being voted for tu fill any township office,
or render either or any of them ineligible to hold the same.®
Constables, supervisors or assessors, as the case may be, of any ward, township,
incorporated district or borough, shall be allowed and paid, out of the county trea-
sury, two dollars for advertising ward, township, district and borough elections ; said
constables shall also be allowed and paid, as aforesaid, twenty cents for delivering to
each township officer, a certificate of his election, as directed by this act, and the act
to which this is a supplement.”
It shall be the duty of every mayor, sheriff, deputy-sheriff, alderman, justice of
the peace, and constable or deputy-constable of every city, county and township or
district within this commonwealth, whenever called upon by any officer of an elec-
12 W. & 8. 229. T Act 2 July 1839 3 1. Purd. 378.
28 W. 220. 8 That is, he shall—1. Enumerate the officers
5 2 Phila. 288. to be elected, 2. Designate the place at which the
414 Penn. St. 510. election is to be held.
5 7 Leg, Int. 183. 3 Am. L. J. 129. ® Act 13 June 1840 2 2. Purd. 378,
6 11 Leg. Int. 126-7. 10 Tbid. 211. Purd. 379.
CONSTABLES. 283
tion, or by any three qualified electors thereof, to clear any window or avenue to
any window, at the place of the general election, which shall be obstructed in
such a way as to prevent voters from approaching the same, and on neglect or
refusal to do, on such requisition, said officer shall be deemed guilty of a mis-
demeanor in office, and, on conviction, shall be fined in any sum not less than one
hundred and not more than one thousand dollars; and it shall be the duty of the
respective constables of each ward, district or township within this commonwealth,
to be present, in person or by deputy, at the place of holding such elections in said
ward, district or township, for the purpose of preserving the peace as aforesaid.’
It shall be the duty of every peace officer, as aforesaid, who shall be present at
any such disturbance at an election as is described in this act, to report the same to
the next court of quarter sessions, and also the names of the witnesses who. can
prove the same; and it shall be the duty of the said court to cause indictments to
be preferred before the grand jury against the persons so offending.?
If it shall be made to appear to any court of quarter sessions of this commonwealth
that any riot or disturbance occurred at the time and place of holding any election
under this act, and the constables who are enjoined by law to attend at such elec-
tions have not given information thereof, according to the provisions of this act, it
shall be the duty of said court to cause the officer or officers, so neglecting the duty
aforesaid, to be proceeded against by indictment for a misdemeanor in office, and on
conviction thereof, the said officer shall be fined in any sum not exceeding one
hundred dollars.’
It shall be the duty of the several courts of quarter sessions of this common-
wealth, at the next term of said court after any election shall have been held under,
this act, to cause the respective constables in said county to be examined on oath
as to whether any breaches of the peace took place at the election within their
respective townships, wards or districts ; and it shall be the duty of said constables
respectively to make return thereof as part of their official return at said court.‘
If the constables or supervisors of any-township, ward or district shall neglect or
refuse to perform the duties herein required of him or them, they shall, respectively,
on conviction, be fined in any sum not less than fifty nor more than one hundred
dollars.5
It shall be the duty of the said inspectors and judge to make out a certificate of
the election of each township officer aforesaid, which shall be signed by them
and delivered to the constable of the proper ward, district or township, and by him
delivered to the said officer, or left at his usual place of abode, within six days there-
after.
By the fee-bill of 1868, constables are entitled to the sum of two dollars, for
attending general elections ; and to the sum of three dollars, for attending special,
township, ward or borough elections.’ But this act does not apply to the counties
of Alleghény, Berks, Montgomery, Philadelphia or Washington.’
No portion of the people possess the right to gather round the polls and remain
there in such numbers as to obstruct the approach of the electors; it is the duty
of the constable, either at the request of the citizens, or under the direction of the
officers of the election, to remove such obstruction, and open an avenue to the polls;
in discharging his duty, he ought to give notice to the people to remove themselves,
before proceeding to violent measures; but, having given such notice, he has the
right to use as much force as may be necessary to accomplish the object, and every
citizen who is called on to assist him is bound to do so.?
VII. AcTIONS AGAINST CONSTABLES.
No action shall be brought against any constable or officer, or any person or
persons acting by his or their order, and in his aid, for anything done in obedience
to any warrant under the hand and seal of any justice of the peace, until demand
1 Act 2 July 1839 3111. Purd. 379. all prosecutions to be commenced within one year.
2 Thid. 3 112. 6 Act 2 July 1839 3 54. Purd. 379.
3 Thid. ¢ 113. 7 Purd. 794.
¢ Ibid. 3 114. 8 Ibid. n.
5 Thid. g 97. By 3 128, the penalty is to be re- 9 Com. v: Hamilton, Q. S. Lancaster, 22 Jan-
covered by indictment‘in the quarter sessions;and uary 1849. Lewis, P. J., MS.
284 CONSTABLES.
hath been made, or left at the usual place of his abode, by the party or parties
intending to bring such action, or by his, her or their attorney or agent, In writing,
signed by the party demanding the same, of the perusal and copy of such warrant,
duly certified under his hand, and the same hath been neglected or refused for the
space of six days after such demand; and in case, after such demand and compli-
ance therewith, by showing the said warrant and giving a copy thereof, certified
as aforesaid to the party demanding the same, any action shall be brought against
such constable, or other person or persons acting in his aid, for any such cause as
aforesaid, without making such justice or justices, who signed or sealed the said
warrant, defendant or defendants, on producing and proving such warrant, at the
trial of such action, the jury shall give their verdict for the defendant or defend-
ants, notwithstanding any defect or defects of jurisdiction in such justice or
justices; and if such action be brought jointly against such justice or justices, and
also against such constable or other officer, or person or persons acting in his or
their aid as aforesaid, then on proof of such warrant, the jury shall find for such
constable or other officer, and person or persons so acting as aforesaid, notwith-
standing such defect of jurisdiction as aforesaid ; and if the verdict shall be given
against the justice or justices, in such case the plaintiff or plaintiffs shall recover
his, her or their costs against him or them, to be taxed in such manner, by the
proper officer, as to include such costs as such plaintiff or plaintiffs are liable to pay
to such defendant or defendants, for whom such verdict shall be found as aforesaid :
Provided always, That where the plaintiff in any such action against any such jus- '
tice of the peace shall obtain a verdict, in case the justices before whom the cause
shall be tried, shall, in open court, certify on the back of the record that the injury
for which such action was brought, was wilfully and maliciously committed, the
plaintiff shall be entitled to have and receive double costs of suit.1_ Provided
always, That no action shall be brought against any justice of the peace for anything
done in the execution of his office, or against any constable or other officer, or per-
son or persons acting as aforesaid, unless commenced within six months after the act
committed.?
In all cases where any alderman or justice of the peace of this commonwealth
shall issue a summons, warrant of arrest or execution, in any civil suit against any
constable or constables, for any debt or demand alleged to be due by him or them,
in his or their individual or private capacity, he shall direct such summons, warrant
of arrest or execution to any other constable in the city or county in which the
said justice may reside, who shall be authorized and bound to serve or execute the
same in the manner prescribed by the act to which this is a supplement, under a
penalty of twenty dollars, to be recovered as other fines are recoverable by the same
act; and if the constable to whom such process shall be directed shall neglect or
refuse to make return of the same, or having made the money or any part of it,
upon the execution, refuses or neglects to pay over or account for the same, he
shall be proceeded against in like manner, and be subject to like proceedings as
constables in other cases are liable to, agreeable to the provisions contained in the
12th section of the act to which this is a supplement.
Where a constable has pursued his warrant, he can be affected with want of
jurisdiction in the magistrate, only where he is sued alone, having, after a proper
demand, refused to furnish a copy of the warrant for the space of six days.4 A
misrecital in the body of an execution does not render it void, nor is the constable
a trespasser in executing it; he is justified under the provisions of this act.
A constable is protected by his writ, if regular in form, and containing nothing on
its face, to indicate a want of jurisdiction on the part of the justice who issued
it. It seems, the warrant may be given in evidence under the general issue."
Trespass against a constable for seizing and selling plaintiff’s goods, under an
execution out of his district, is within the act.® But not an action for an escape
or for taking the goods of A. under a warrant to levy on the goods of B. 3° or for
i
1 Act 21 March 1772 2 6. Purd. 379. 6 96 Penn. St. 31.
2 feet 7. T 3 Binn. 218.
8 Act 28 March 1820 2 1. Purd. 380, § 118. &R. 185,
£58. & BR. 302. 1 Binn. 124. 3 Ibid. 219. 9 8 Penn. St. 405.
5 2 W. 424, 10 3 Clark 281. See 1 Bro. 343.
CONSTABLES. 285
taking illegal fees under color of an execution.! The limitation may be taken advan-
tage of, under the general issue.?
VIII. MiscELLANEOUS PROVISIONS.
Every constable is required, in the first week in each term, to make returns under
oath of all places where liquors are kept for sale or sold, except stores kept by drug-
gists and apothecaries, stating which of said places are licensed and which are unli-
censed, and it is made the duty of the judge to see that this return is faithfully made,
and on failure of any constable to comply with this provision, or, if it be found upon
examination or inquiry by said court that any constable has either wilfully or negli-
gently omitted to return all such houses and the names of the proprietors thereof in
his bailiwick, he shall be guilty of wilfully or negligently making a false return, and
the court shall suspend him from office and direct the district-attorney to indict and
try said officer, and, if found guilty, he shall be fined ina sum not exceeding five
hundred dollars and undergo an imprisonment, either simple or solitary, not exceed-
ing two years, both or either, in the discretion of the court.?
The second section of this act provides for monthly visits, and for forthwith returns
of violations of the act.
Any constable who shall take up and convey to jail any convict who shall
escape from his confinement, shall be allowed mileage, at the same rate as con-
stables are commonly allowed ; to be paid by the treasurer of the proper county.*
It shall be the duty of the judges of the several courts of quarter sessions,
oyer and terminer, and common pleas within this commonwealth, after the con-
stables shall have made their returns on the first day of the sessions, to ascertain
the number of constables attending, and to select a sufficient number’ to attend
during the term of the said court, and to discharge the other constables, and to
select for every court thereafter, until a new election of constables shall be held:
Provided, That no constable shall be obliged to serve more than one week at any
one time, until the whole list shall have been gone through; and when an
adjourned court shall be held, it shall be the duty of the sheriff to give notice
to the constable or constables selected by the judges, to attend at the said
adjourned court?
It shall be the duty of the clerk or prothonotary of any of the said courts,
as the case may be, to certify the name or names of the constable or constables,
and the number of days each constable shall have attended, to the commissioners
of the proper county, who shall thereupon draw their warrant on the county
treasurer in behalf of the said constable or constables for one dollar for each and
every day he or they shall have respectively attended.
The judges of the several courts of this commonwealth shall have power to
appoint a crier for the respective court, and so many tipstaves or constables as
may be necessary to attend upon the court; and the said officers shall be paid by
the respective county, such sums for each day’s attendance as the said judges shall
allow.’ ‘
By act of 8th May 1854, § 31, the board of directors or controllers of any school
district, in the event of their failure, from any reason, to procure a collector of
school taxes, may appoint to that office the constable of the school district, who
shall forfeit, for every refusal to execute the same, by proof thereof being made
before any alderman or justice of the peace, the sum of fifty dollars, which shall
be added to the school fund of the proper district.’
A constable is not bound to execute a criminal warrant, which appears to be
illegal on its face ; as, if issued without oath, but merely on common rumor of the
party’s guilt.® If a constable be resisted in the execution of his process, he may
raise the power of the county for his assistance, in the same manner as the sheriff
1 Keller v. Hammer, Bright. on Costs, 159. 5 Act 21 January 1814 2 1. Ibid.
29S. &R. 14. , 6 Act 14 April 1834 3 78. Purd. 381,
3 Act 13 May 1887. Purd. 1228. 7 Purd. 337.
¢ Act 5 April 1790 2 33. Purd. 381. 8 3 Binn. 38. 2 Am. L. J. 484,
286 CONSTABLES,
may; and a person refusing to assist him, is indictable for such refusal. So, the
refusal, without sufficient cause, to assist a constable in preventing the escape of a
person in his custody, is an indictable offence? And the keeper of the prison is
bound to receive a person arrested and brought to him by a constable, and charged
with a breach of the peace in his presence.’ A constable is bound to pursue,
search for, and arrest offenders, without other compensation than his legal fees,
and cannot recover a reward for arresting a person against whom a warrant has
been placed in his hands.‘ :
A constable who serves subpoenas for the court, is entitled to charge according to
the sheriff’s fee-bill; but for serving those issued by a justice, only according to the
constable’s fee-bill.5 He is entitled to mileage on each of several suits, by the same
plaintiff against different defendants, though service was effected on all the parties
on one journey.®
IX. ForMs oF PROCESS TO ENFORCE A FAITHFUL DISCHARGE OF THE DUTIES OF
THE OFFICE OF CONSTABLE.
FORM OF WARRANT AGAINST A PERSON ELECTED, OR APPOINTED, A CONSTABLE, WHO NEGLECTS,
OR REFUSES, TO DISCHARGE THE DUTIES OF THE OFFICE.
YORK COUNTY, ss.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To the Constable of York, in the said county, greeting:
Waersas, A. B., of the township of N , in the said county, hath been duly elected
and appointed (or ‘‘ hath been duly appointed’’) constable of the said township, but refusey
or neglects to take upon himself the said office, or to undertake the duties of the same.
These are, therefore, to command you to take the said A. B., and bring him before J. \t.,
one of our justices of the peace in and for the said county, to answer the premises, aid
further to be dealt with according to law. Witness the said J. R., at York aforesaid, tha
fifth day of May, a. p. 1880. J. R., Justice of the Peace. [sEAL.]
FORM OF A SUMMONS AGAINST A CONSTABLE, WHO HAS NEGLECTED, OR REFUSED, TO MAKE
: RETURN TO AN EXECUTION.
MONROE COUNTY, ss.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To the Constable of P—— Township, in the County of Monroe, greeting:
Wuereas, J. R., one of the justices of the peace in and for the county of Monroe, lately,
that is to say, on the first day of April, a. p. 1880, issued an execution directed to W. X.,
constable of N—— township, in the said county, for a debt of ten dollars and fifty cents,
together with fifteen cents interest, and one dollar twenty-five cents costs of suit, wherein
O. P. is plaintiff, and Q. R. is defendant, which execution was made returnable on or
before the 20th of April, a. p. 1880. And, although the said execution came to the hands
of the said W. X., constable, yet he hath not made return thereof, according to law
Therefore, we command you, that you summon the said W. X. to appear before our said
justice, on the tenth day of May instant, at nine o’clock in the forenoon, at his office in
P. township, then and there to show cause why judgment shall not be rendered, and
an execution issue against him, for the amount of the above-mentioned execution. Wit-
ness the said J. R., at P. township aforesaid, the fourth day of May, a. p. 1880.
. B., Justice of the Peace. [szat.]
EXECUTION AGAINST A CONSTABLE ON A JUDGMENT, FOR NOT HAVING MADE RETURN TO AN
EXECUTION.
MONROE COUNTY, ss.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To the Constable of P. Township, in the county of Monroe, greeting :
Wuerzas, O. P. hath obtained judgment, before J. R., one of our justices of the peace
in and for the said county, against W. X., constable of N—— township in the county of
Monroe, for a debt of eleven dollars and thirty-five cents eae the amount of an execu-
tion in the hands of the said constable, against a certain Q. R., wherein the said O. P. is
the plaintiff), together with one dollar and twenty cents costs of suit; and the said W.
X. havirig hitherto neglected to comply with the said judgment, we command you, that
of the goods and chattels of the said W. X., you levy the debt and costs aforesaid, and
15 Whart. 437, 4 10 Penn. St. 39. 5 Am. L. Reg. 98,
2 6 Blackf, 277. 5 1 Bro. 274. 2 Chest. Co. R. 105,
'88. & BR. 47. 6 103 Penn. St. 433. .
CONSTABLES, 287
for want of sufficient distress, that you take the body of the said W. X., and convey him
to the common jail of the said county, there to be kept until the debt and costs aforesaid
be fully paid, or he be otherwise discharged by due course of law. Make return hereof
to our said justice, on or before the 30th day of May, a. pv. 1880, Witness the said J. R.
at P—— aforesaid, the tenth day of May, a. p. 1880.
J.R., Justice of the Peace. [szaz.]
WARRANT AGAINST A CONSTABLE FOR NEGLECT OF DUTY.
BEAVER COUNTY, ss.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To the Constable of L—— Township, in the county of Beaver, greeting:
Wuerkas, on the tenth day of May last, a warrant, issued by J. R., one of our justices
of the peace in and for the county of Beaver, was directed and delivered to C. D., con-
stable of H——, in the said county, wherein the said constable was commanded to take
a certain H. S., and carry him before the said J. R. forthwith, to answer for a certain
larceny in stealing and carrying away the goods and chattels of S. B.; and, whereas,
the said C. D. hath neglected, or refused, to execute the said warrant, and the said H.
S. hath absconded, as it is said. These are, therefore, to command you to take the said
C. D., and bring him before the said J. R. forthwith, to answer for the said neglect of
duty, and further to be dealt with according to law. Witness the said J. R., at D—~
aforesaid, the first day of June, a. p. 1880.
J. R., Justice of the Peace. [szat.]
FORM OF SUPERSEDEAS TO A CONSTABLE.
BUCKS COUNTY, ss.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
To the Constable of D—— Township, in the County of Bucks, and to each and every
Constable in the said county, greeting :
Forasuucu as T. D., of J—— township, in the said county, yeoman, hath this day
entered into a recognisance, with sufficient sureties, before J. R., one of our justices of
the peace in and for the said county, for the appearance of the said T. D., at the next
court of quarter sessions of the peace, to be held for the county aforesaid, to answer
the complaint of L. S., made before A. B., one of the justices of the peace of the said
county, for an assault and battery, committed on him by the said T. D. (or as the case
maybe). These are, therefore, to command you, that you forbear to take, arrest, imprison
or otherwise molest the said T. D. for the cause aforesaid ; and if you have for that cause,
and none other, taken and imprisoned the said T. D., that then you discharge and set at
liberty the said T. D., without further delay, as you will answer the same at your peril.
Given under the hand and seal of the said J. R., at D——, in the said county, the second
-day of May, a. p. 1880. J. R., Justice of the Peace. [smat.]
DISCHARGE TO BE SENT TO THE KEEPER OF THE COUNTY PRISON, OR A CONSTABLE.
COUNTY OF BUCKS, ss.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To the Constable of A—— township, or to the Keeper of the Prison of the County of
Bucks:
The Commonwealth ) Charged before J. R., one of our justices of the peace in and for the
vs. said county, with having committed an assault and battery on C. D.
A. B. Committed for a further hearing the tenth day of May 1880.
Discharge out of your custody [or deliver to P. C., constable of F—— township] the
body of the above-named defendant, if detained for no other cause than that above men-
tioned, and for so doing this shall be your sufficient warrant. Given under my hand and
seal, this [tenth] day of [May], a. p. 1880. J. R., Justice of the Peace. [szau.]
For other forms relating to the office of constable, see Marsh’s Constable’s Guide,
App’.
[ 288 J
Contract.
I. Definition of a contract. II. Consideration of a contract.
I. A contract is a covenant or agreement between two or more persons, with a
lawful consideration or cause :—as, if a man sell his horse, or other things, to another,
for a sum of money, or covenants, in consideration of £20, to make him the lease
of a farm, &. These are good contracts, because there is a guid pro quo (or one
thing for another); but if a person make a promise to me that I shall have 20s.,
and that he will be debtor to me therefor, and after I demand the 20s., and he will
not give it me, yet I shall never have an action to recover this 20s., because this
promise (being without consideration) was no contract.
Express contracts are, where the terms of the agreement are openly uttered and
avowed at the time the agreement is entered into. Implied contracts arise under
circumstances which, according to the ordinary dealing and understanding of men,
show a mutual intention to contract. Constructive contracts are fictions of law,
adopted for the purpose of enforcing legal duties, by actions ex contractd, where no
proper contract exists, express or implied. Though a contract be formal and com-
plete, yet, if understood by the parties as a jest, it is not binding.
All contracts to change the course of trials, or the effects of trials, whether to
obtain a liberation of a prisoner by the payment of money to the jailer, or to obtain
a pardon by the use of money, directly or indirectly, must be void. Every contract
made for or about any matter or thing which is prohibited and made unlawful by
any statute, is a void contract, though the statute itself doth not mention that it
shall be so, but only inflicts a penalty on the offender; because a penalty implies
a prohibition, though there be no prohibitory words in the statute.6 Where a
contract is to restrain a party generally from carrying on trade throughout the state,
it is unlawful and void; but if it be to restrain him only in a particular place, it
is not so.6 A contract made on Sunday is void ;’ but the statute does not avoid
an executed contract, because made on Sunday.®
A contract based on a supposed state of things which had no existence in fact
will be relieved against, on the ground of mistake. Whenever there is a gross
misrepresentation of facts relating to the subject of a contract, the contract is
fraudulent and void ; but ignorance of the law does not affect contracts, nor excuse
a party from the legal consequences of particular acts.
The time of a payment is part of a contract; and if no time be expressed in the
agreement, the money is payable immediately* What is a reasonable time within
which an act is to be performed, when a contract is silent on the subject, is a ques-
sion of law.’ A contract to complete work dy a certain time, means that it shall be
done before that time."
The contract of a surety being without a beneficial consideration, is not to be
extended beyond the strict technical import ;* but he is as much bound by the true
meaning of the obligation as his principal."® His liability is commensurate of that
of the principal.”
When a contract is entire, for the delivery of a number of specific articles, at a
certain time and place, the vendee is not bound to receive a part; and though
a part be delivered, he is not liable to pay for the same, if willing to accept and pay
for the whole; but, if the vendee accept a part, he thereby disaffirms the entirety
of the contract, and will be obliged to accept and pay for so many articles as are
1 Toml. Law Dict. 7. 1 Bouy. Inst. 222. 98 W.492, 8 Penn. St. 21.
2 29 Penn. St. 465. 10 4 Dall. 250.
8 Add. 261. 7 W. 3872.
47 W.155, And see 100 Penn. St. 561. 12 8 Johns. 189. 89 Penn. St. 436.
5 1] Binn. 113, 6 W. 233. 1 Bouv. Inst. 296. 18 2 Greenl. 249.
6 7 Cow. 307. 1 Bouv. Inst. 236. 4 3P. & W. 48.
71 Bro. 171. 6 W. 231. 3 W.& 8.507. 4 16 Ibid. 27. 1 W.310. 2W.N.C. 541.
W.N. CO. 462, 560 161558. & R. 100.
878 Penn. St. 473. See 98 Ibid. 389. 11 6 W.N. C. 208,
CONTRACT. 289
individually furnished according to the contract.! But one action can be maintained
on an entire contract.?
When neither time nor place for delivery is stipulated, the rule is, that the
articles are to be delivered at the place where they are at the time of sale; when
the time of delivery is fixed by the contract, the vendor must seek the vendee at his
residence, and there tender the articles. If the articles are cumbersome, the vendor
must seek the vendee, when the delivery is to be to the vendee, a reasonable time
before the day of delivery, and ask him to appoint a place of delivery. A contract
to deliver specific articles of property to another, at a certain time and place, in
discharge of a previous debt, is performed, and the debt satisfied by a tender and
delivery of the property, at the time and place, although the payee did not attend
to receive the property, and no action on the contract can afterwards be maintained
against the debtor.* On a contract to deliver specific articles, prima facie, the
debtor is to be the actor; and this is to be the presumption, until circumstances
show the contrary ; but even in such case, he is not bound to carry the property
about, seeking the creditor, in order to tender it to him; he must ask the creditor
to appoint a reasonable place to receive it.
Where one party intends to abandon or rescind a contract, on the ground of a
violation of it by the other, he must do so promptly and decidedly, on the first
information of such breach. If he negotiate with the party, after knowledge of
the breach, and permit him to proceed in the work, it is a waiver of his right to
rescind the contract.®
Where a contract is made for any building, of whatever size or dimensions, it
becomes a law to the parties, and they are both bound by it; and whatever addi-
tions or alterations are made in such building, they form a new contract, either
expressed or implied, without affecting the original contract, and must be paid for
agreeable to such new contract.’ But a contractor for the erection of a building,
according to specifications in writing, cannot recover extra compensation for altera-
tions in the plan, without clear and satisfactory evidence of a new, distinct and
independent contract between the parties, authorizing such alterations, and agreeing
to pay for them at a fixed price, or what they may be reasonably worth.’
Where a person makes a contract with another, to perform certain services, for a
definite period, at a stipulated salary, and continues in such service beyond the
period agreed upon, in the absence of any new agreement, the presumption of law
is, that the original rate of compensation was to be continued.®
Contracts are governed by the lex loci, or the law of the place where they are
made ; and if valid there, they are to be adjudged valid everywhere, by the law of
nations; but the remedy is according to the laws of the country where sued.
The law of any foreign state, if relied on, must be proved before the court which is
called on to decide—otherwise it cannot take notice of it.° The presumption of
the law is, that a contract is intended to be performed in the place or country in
which it is made, if there be not an express agreement or necessary implication
that it is to be performed elsewhere; and, whenever such understanding is uot.
apparent, the law of the contract is the law of the place where it is made.” Asa
general rule, where a contract is entire, it is incumbent on the plaintiff to show
a performance of all that was stipulated on his part, to be performed, and on failure
so to do, he is notentitled to recover anything. Where there has been a substantial
and bond fide compliance, on the part of the plaintiff, with his contract, he shall
not be precluded from a recovery of his compensation, on account of some slight
imperfection, for which the defendant may be compensated in damages.”
Where a contract is voidable on account of a fraud practised upon the party
being merely against conscience, it may be ratified and confirmed without a new
consideration."3 But where there has been actual and positive fraud, or the party
12P.&W. 63. 2W.&S8. 26. 7 2 Bay 401.
2105 Penn. St. 350. 89 Penn. Bt. 245.
33 W.&S. 295. 2 Greenl. Evid. 3610. See 9 29 Ibid. 184. 36 Ibid. 367.
41 Leg. Int. 253. 10 2 Penn. Bl. 210.
45 W. 262. 1 6 Whart. 117.
5 31 Penn. St. 265. 12 2 Gr. 278. ;
$5 BR. 69. 18 44 Penn. St. 9. 67 Ibid. 217. 69 Ibid. 81.
19
990 CONTRACT.
has acted mala fide, there can be no confirmation.’ So, a contract void on the
ground of public policy, or as against a statute, as the usury law, is incapable of
confirmation.? A forged instrument is incapable of ratification ;° so, of any fraud
which involves a crime ; otherwise, where the transaction is contrary only to good
faith and fair dealing, and merely affects the individual interest of the person
defrauded .*
II. ConsrpERarion or a conrract.—In order to give validity to a contract, it
must be founded on a sufficient consideration. There must be something given in
exchange—something that is mutual, or something which is the inducement to the
contract, and it must be a thing which is lawful, and competent in value to sustain
the assumption. A contract without a consideration is a nude pact, and not bind-
ing; whether the agreement be verbal or in writing, it is still a nude pact, and will
not support ap action, if a consideration be wanting.» When the interest of a man
is promoted, though not at his request, and he afterwards deliberately engages to pay
for it, the law very properly says he shall fulfil his promise.®
A consideration is sufficient, if it arise from any act of the plaintiff, from which
the defendant or a stranger derives any benefit, however small, if such act is per-
formed by the plaintiff, with the assent, express or implied, of the defendant, or by
reason of any damage, or any suspension or forbearance of the plaintiff’s right at
law or in equity, or any possibility of loss, occasioned to the plaintiff by the promise
of another, although no actual benefit accrues to the party undertaking.” A moral
or equitable obligation is sufficient consideration for an assumption? The compro-
mise of a doubtful right is a sufficient consideration to support a contract ;* so is
the settlement of family disputes.’°
An adjournment of a suit in a justice’s court is a sufficient consideration for an
agreement." Labor done and services rendered for one, without his request or
privity, however beneficial or meritorious, as saving his property from the fire,
affords no ground of action.? A request by a father that a physician will attend
his son, who is of full age, and sick at his father’s house, does not render the father
liable to pay for the services rendered.¥
An agreement to forbear to sue, for a reasonable time, is a consideration certain
enough upon which to sustain an action.“ Forbearance, either limited or general,
is a good consideration for a promise to pay the debt of a third person.” In assumpsit
on a promise to pay the debt of another, in consideration of forbearance, the fact that
the debt was not due at the time of the promise, or that it was voidable in conse-
quence of the infancy of the debtor, or that it was barred by the act of limitation,
furnishes no defence to the action.!®
An undertaking to answer for the debt of another, though in writing, and signed
by the defendant, is void, if no consideration between the plaintiff and defendant,
either of forbearance or otherwise ;'7 unless the undertaking be contemporaneous
with the original debt."® An injury to the party to whom the promise is made, ora
benefit to the party promising, is sufficient consideration.”
By act 26th April 1855, it is provided, that no action shall be brought whereby to
charge any executor or administrator, upon any promise to answer damages out of
his own estate, or whereby to charge the defendant, upon any special promise, to
answer for the debt or default of another, unless the agreement upon which such
action shall be brought, or some memorandum or note thereof, shall be in writing
and signed by the party to be charged therewith, or some other person by him
authorized. But the act shall not apply to or affect any contract, the consideration
of which shall be a less sum than twenty dollars.”
148. & R. 483, 1 P.& W.32. 67 Penn. St. 1° 105 Penn. St.121. Ibid. 31.
891. 69 Ibid. 81. 1 1 Cow. 99.
28 W. 4&5. 31. 67 Penn. St. 217. 69 [bid. 81. 12 20 Johns, 28.
8 92 Penn. St. 447. 18 4 W. 247,
412 W. N.C. 165. 106 Penn. St. 57, 1412~P. & W. 383.
5 2 Kent’s Com. 463. 1 Bouv. Inst. 237. 6 1% 3W.&S8. 420.
Wheat. 404. 16 5 Ibid. 476.
6 1 Bro. 109, 17 11 Johns. 29,
72W.104. 3 Ibid. 352. 18 6 Whart. 437.
8 5 Binn. 33. 28 Penn. St. 179, 94 Ibid. 218. 19 3 Johns. 100,
6 a 8. & R. 425, 93 Penn. St. 470. 8W.N. 9 Purd. 943,
CONVICTS. ‘991
This statute does not apply to a direct promise to pay for work to be performed
for another. The liability of the promisor in such case springs out of the perform-
ance of the promisee, and the consideration moves from the one directly to the
other ; consequently, it is not within the statute.’ To bring a case within the act,
the promisee must be the original creditor? If the old debt remain, the contract is
not an original undertaking, and is therefore within the statute.2 An agreement made
between parties prior to or contemporaneously with their executing a written obli-
gation as sureties, by which one promises to indemnify the other from loss, is not
required to be in writing.*
A contract required to be in writing must appear with reasonable certainty, with-
out recourse to parol proof, from the instrument itself, and parol testimony cannot
be admitted either to contradict or to vary it. The authority as an agent by whom
the contract is signed need not, under this act, be in writing, but may be proved by
parol. It is well settled, however, that such agent must be a third person; and
that the other party to the contract is not competent to act as agent for the party
intended to be charged.® The consideration upon which the contract is made need
not be expressed in the writing, but may be proved by paroi.®
Since the passage of this act, an indorser of a uote, whose name is written before
that of the payee, is prima facie liable as second indorser ;’ and he is entitled to
the privilege of an indorser, in a suit by the payee.®
Convicts.
I. Punishment for importing convicts. III. Deduction from sentences for good behavior.
II. Actions against convicts.
I. Act 31 Marcy 1861. Purd 388.
Secr. 71. If any master or commander of any ship, boat or other vessel, arriving
from any foreign country, place or port, at any port, harbor or place within this
commonwealth, shall knowingly bring with him any person, either as a passenger,
working hand or otherwise, who shall have been convicted of any offence in any
foreign country or place, which, if committed within this commonwealth, would
have subjected the offender to imprisonment at labor, with intent to land such
person or permit him to land, such master or commander shall be guilty of a mis-
demeanor, and on conviction thereof, be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding three
hundred dollars, and undergo an imprisonment not exceeding one year.
II. Act 31 Marca 1860. Purd. 388.
Sect. 71. In all cases of felony heretofore committed, or which may hereafter be
eommitted, it shall and may be lawful for any person injured or aggrieved by such
felony, to have and maintain his action against the person or persons guilty of
such felony, in like manner as if the offence committed had not been felomiously
done; and in no case whatever, shall the action of the party injured, be deemed,
taken or adjudged to be merged in the felony, or in any manner affected thereby.
Act 31 May 1718. Purd. 387.
Szcr. 18. Where any person or persons charged, committed to prisun, or con-
victed of any of the said capital crimes, being justly indebted to any other person
or persons, he or they so indebted may be arrested, or their goods and chattels
attached, to answer the suits of their respéctive creditors; who, making due proof
that the debts or sums demanded are really and without fraud due, shall recover
judgment for the same, and executions may be awarded against the lands, goods
and chattels of such defendants, as is usual in other cases.®
1 30 Penn. St. 138. And see 38 Ibid. 302. 6 45 Penn. St. 345.
2 54 Ibid. 118. 7 59 Ibid. 144, 60 Ibid. 35. 85 Ibid. 99.
3 50 Ibid. 52. 54 Ibid. 118. 64 Ibid. 406. 8 11 Ibid. 460. And see 34 Ibid. 58.
12 N. Y. 462 9 The act 12 April 1870 extends this provision
4 Phila. 75. See 31 Penn. St. 259-60. to prisoners in county jails. Pamph. 32.
292 CORONER.
Act 13 Jung 1836. Purd. 387.
Secr. 78. A writ of attachment may be issued against a person under sentence
of imprisonment, upon conviction of a crime by a court of competent jurisdiction,
and such attachment may be dissolved in the manner hereinbefore provided in the
case of a foreign corporation, and not otherwise; but if, in such case, the term
of imprisonment of the defendant shall elapse, or if he shall be otherwise legally
discharged therefrom, before the money shall be paid, it shall be lawful for him to
put in and perfect special bail to the plaintiff’s action, and thereupon the security
which may have been given by him in lieu of bail, shall cease and become void,
and any deposit which may have been made (as) aforesaid, shall be restored to him.
Aot 16 Jung 1836. Purd. 387.
Sxor. 21. If any person against whom a judgment in a civil action of (or)
proceedings shall have been rendered, shall be charged, committed to prison or
convicted of any crime, it shall be lawful for the plaintiff in such judgment to have
execution thereof against the real and personal estate of such person, in like manner
as in other cases.
III. Aor 21 May 1869. Purd. 562.
Sxct. 21. All prisoners who have been or shall hereafter be convicted of any
offence against the laws of the state of Pennsylvania, and confined in any state
prison or penitentiary in execution of the judgment or sentence upon such convic-
tion, who so conduct themselves that no charge for misconduct shall be sustained
against them, shall, if the governor shall so direct, have a deduction of one month
on each of the first two years, of two months on each succeeding year to the fifth
year, and of three months on each following year to the tenth year, and of four
months on each remaining year of the term of their sentence; and shall be entitled
to their discharge so much the sooner, upon the certificate of the warden or prin-
cipal keeper of such prison or penitentiary, with the approval of the board of
inspectors of the same.
Of the Coroner,
I. Of the office and duties of the coroner. II. Forms used in the coroner’s office.
I. THe coroner is an offiger, so called, because he hath principally to do with
pleas of the crown.’ In this state, coroners are elected by the citizens of the
respective counties at the general election, and are commissioned by the governor.
They hold their offices for the term of three years, if they so long behave them-
selves well, and until a successor be duly qualified; but they are re-eligible,
Vacancies in the office are filled by an appointment by the governor, to continue
until the next general election, or until a successor shall be chosen and qualified?
No person is eligible who has not been a citizen and inhabitant of the county for
one year next preceding his appointment.®
Coroners are required, by the act of 1834, before they are commissioned or exe-
cute any of the duties of the office, to enter into a recognisauce, and become bound
in a bond, with at least two sufficient sureties, in one-fourth of the sum required
from the sheriff of the county, conditioned that they will “ well and truly perform
all and singular the duties to the said office of coroner appertaining.” The sureties
are to be approved by the judges of the court of common pleas ; the recognisance is
to be recorded ; the names of the sureties are to be entered by the prothonotary
upon his judgment docket; and the recognisance becomes a lien upon all the real
estate of the coroner and his sureties, within the county; and it stands as security
not only to the commonwealth, but to all persons whomsoever for the faithful dis-
charge of the duties of the office.‘
11 Bil. Com. 346. 5 Thid. 2 3.
2 Const, art. XIV. 2 1-2. 4 Purd. 397-8,
CORONER. 293
The office and power of the coroner are ministerial and judicial. The ministerial
power of the coroner is only as a substitute for the sheriff; for when there is a
vacancy in the office of sheriff, or when a just exception is taken to the sheriff, for
suspicion aD as that he is interested in the suit, or of kin either to the
plaintiff or defendant, the process must be awarded to the coroner, in place of
the sheriff, to be executed. And his duties in relation to the execution and return
of such process, are precisely the same as those of the sheriff in other cases.}
The judicial duties of the coroner are principally prescribed by the statute of
4 Edw. I., ‘concerning the office of the coroner.” The,chief of these duties is to
inquire when amy person is slain, or dies suddenly, or in prison, concerning the
manner of his death ; and for this purpose he must summon a jury, and hold an
inquisition, on view of the dead body; for if the body be not found, the coroner
sannot sit.?
Justices of the peace ought to inform themselves in relation to the duties of the
coroner, in this respect, inasmuch as it is provided by the act 27th May 1841, § 15,
‘“‘That in all cases where by law the coroner of any county is required to hold an
inquest over a dead body, it shall be lawful for a justice of the peace of the proper
county to hold the same, where there is no lawfully appointed coroner, or he is
absent from the county, unable to attend, or his office is held more than ten miles
distant from the place where the death occurred or the body was found; and said
justice shall have like power to select, summon and compel the attendance of jurors
and witnesses, and shall receive like fees, and tax like costs, and the inquest shall
have like force and effect in law: Provided, That no fees or costs shall be allowed
or paid said justice or inquest, until the proceedings are submitted to the court of
quarter sessions of the proper county, and said court shall adjudge that there was
reasonable cause for holding said inquest, and approve of the same.”*® A coroner
in his judicial capacity cannot appoint a deputy.*
The justice should bear in mind, that he has no power to hold an inquest over
a dead body, except in the cases provided for in the statute. The prevalent notion
that a justice of the peace has concurrent power to inquire into the circumstances
of a sudden or violent death, upon view of the body, is without authority in the law.
_The statute of 4 Edw. I. commands the coroner alone to go to the place where any
one is slain or has suddenly died; and by warrant to the bailiffs or constables, to
summon a jury from the neighboring towns, to inquire into the manner of the
killing, or the circumstances of the death. From the words of the statute, it results,
that the coroner’s jurisdiction is a special one, and that no one else can take an
inquisition in the manner prescribed ;° except in the cases enumerated in the act
of 1841.
The statute of 4 Edw. I. being wholly directory and in affirmance of the common
law, the coroner is not thereby restrained from any branch of his power, nor excused
from any part of his duty, not mentioned in it, which was incident to his office before ;
and therefore, though the statute mentions only inquiries of the death of persons
slain, drowned or suddenly dead, yet the coroner ought also to inquire of the death
of those who die in prison® But by the act of 29th March 1819, the coroner of
Philadelphia county is not to hold an inquest on the body of any prisoner who may
die in the common jail of that county, unless required by the inspectors, or in cases
of death by violence.? And by act of 16th April 1845, he is prohibited from
holding an inquest on the body of any deceased person, unless he shall have died
of violent death. The act 22d March 1867, however, provides that he shall hold
an inquest on the body of any person who shall have died of violent death, or whose
death shall be sudden, provided such sudden death be after an illness of less than
1 Rob. Dig. 106. give him notice of the death, and of the necessity |
21 Bl. Com. 348, Being a judicial officer he of his official attendance. Pamph. 740.
has power to compel the attendance of witnesses, 41 Chit. 74§. The coroners of Bucks, Chester,
by attachment. 11 Phila. 387. Northampton, Philadelphia, and Schuylkill have
8 Purd. 401. The act of 19 April 1856, pro- been authorized to appoint deputies, by special
vides that this section shall not hereafter autho- statutes. See Purd. 399.
rize the holding of an inquest by a justice of the 5 6 Whart. 672.
peace, within the county of Allegheny, except in 6 2 Hawk. P. C.c. 47. Rob. Dig. 104.
cases where it is impracticable to obtain the per- T Purd. 401, 1081.
sonal attendance of the coroner, after notice given 8 Ibid. 401.
to him, or reasonable and proper efforts made to
294 CORONER.
24 hours, and no regular practising physician shall have been in attendance within
that time ; or that suspicious circumstances shall render the same necessary ; which
said suspicions shall first be sworn to by one or more citizens of the city.’ : ;
The subjects of inquiry for a coroner’s inquest are cases of sudden and violent
deaths, whether they take place from the visitation of God ; by misfortune (as if
sudden death ensue in consequence of a fall or other casualty) ; by suicide ; or by
the hand of another, whether by murder, manslaughter, in self-defence or by acci-
dent. But he is only to hold an inquest where there has been a violent and un-
natural death, or reasonable suspicion of such a death; an accident superinducing
disease and death, at the end of days and weeks, is not a case for an inquest. There
ought at least to be a reasonable suspicion that the party came to his death by vio-
lent and unnatural means; for if the death, however sudden, was from fever or
other visitation of God, there is no occasion for the coroner’s interference.’ Where,
however, death occurs from any violence done to a person by another, although
such violence may not suddenly terminate the life of the party injured, it is still the
duty of the coroner to hold an inquest.® : ;
An inquisition of death, by the oath of lawful men of the county, is sufficient
without saying they were of the next town, so that it appear at what place, and by
what jurors, by name, it was taken, and that such jurors were sworn. At the pre-
sent day they are selected and summoned by the coroner himself or his deputies.
The number of jurors on a coroner’s inquest was not fixed by the common law;
but by the act 16th May 1857, it is provided, that the number shall not be more than
six to attend any one inquest.‘
It is clearly agreed, that the inquest must be taken on the view of the dead body,
and an inquest taken otherwise by a coroner is void; therefore, where the body
cannot be féund, or is so far decayed that a view can be of no service, no inquisition
can be taken by the coroner. If the body be buried before the coroner comes, he
ought to take it up and take his view thereof, within any reasonable time after such
interment; but if he should take an inquest after a body hath been so long buried,
that it may reasonably be presumed that the view of it could be of no manner of
use for the information of the jurors, the court into which the inquisition is returned,
will, in their discretion, refuse to receive or file it, upon affidavit of the whole cir-
cumstances of the proceeding. Yet the court refused in one case to quash an
indictment taken a year after the body had been buried, for factum valet, quod fiers
non debit. It is not necessary that the inquisition be taken at the very same place
where the body was viewed; and it hath been resolved, that an inquisition taken at
D., on the view of the body lying dead at L., may be good.
The jury must be sworn, and charged by the coroner to inquire, upon view
of the body, how the party came by his death, whether by murder or misfortune, or
felo de se. If slain, it is to be inquired where slain, by whom. and by what means
or instrument; whether slain in the place where the body lies or not, of what length,
depth and breadth are the wounds ; in what part of the body inflicted, and generally
concerning all the circumstances of the party’s death. The inquest are also to
inquire of all accessories before the fact, but they cannot inquire of accessories
after the fact. If persons who are found guilty by the inquest be taken, the coroner
may and must commit them to the sheriff, who is to confine them in prison. And
by the statute 1 & 2 Philip & Mary, c. 13, the coroner is to take the examinations
against the principal and accessories before the fact, and put them in writing, and
bind over the witnesses by recognisance to the next jail delivery, and then to return
the inquisition, examinations and recognisances. The coroner’s inquest must have
all the evidence offered to them on oath, whether against or in favor of the accused,
for it is not so much an accusation or indictment, as an inquest of office.®
In order to aid him in the performance of his duty, the coroner has authority to
order 2 post mortem examingtion, at the public charge; and the surgeon employed
by him for that purpose, where the amount of compensation is not fixed by law,® is
1 Pamph. 532. set aside, or is absolutely void. 4 Park. 519.
2 1 East P. C. 382. 2 Hale H. P. C. 62. 6 In Lancaster county, the compensation for
8 2 Gr. 262. such service is fixed at $10, unless increased by
4 Pamph. 536. the county commissioners, by the act of 8 Febru-
5 Rob. Dig. 104-5. A coroner has no power to ary 1848. Purd. 401. This act has since been
hold a second inquest, unless the first has been extended to the counties of Armstrong, Blair,
CORONER. 295
entitled to a reasonable compensation from the county for his services. The coroner
has authority to pledge the responsibility of the county for the compensation of all
auxiliary services which are necessary to the proper execution of his office, and
which he could by no other means command. When his duty requires him to
disinter a body, for instance, he cannot be expected to do it with his own hands, or
by hands paid for with his own means. True, he is entitled to fees, but they are
given for particular acts of official duty; not as a fund for contingent expenses.
The coroner is the proper judge of the necessity of holding an inquest and mak-
ing a post mortem examination. It is sufficient for the surgeon summoned to aid
him in it, to know that the proper officer of the county requires his services, and
that he has power, by his contract, to bind the county for the payment of a reason-
able compensation for them.? The county commissioners have no power to appoint
a surgeon to perform such services, so as to preclude the coroner from selecting a
proper person in his discretion.
The fees of the coroner are fixed by the act 28th March 1814,$ as follows :°
Fees of the coroner.—Viewing a dead body . “ ‘ : . $2.75
Summoning and qualitying an inquest, drawing and returning inquisition. 1.37%
Summoning and qualifying each witness .. ‘ . 25
To be paid out of the goods, chattels, lands or tenements of the slayer (in case of
murder or manslaughter), if any he hath, otherwise by the county, with mileage
from the court-house to the place of viewing the body.
Execating any process or writs of any kind, the same fees as are allowed to the
sheriff, and the same mileage.
In an action by a coroner against a county to recover his fees for the making
of an inquest, his inquisition upon the body of the deceased, signed by his phy-
sician, and signed and sealed hy himself and his jury of six, is admissible in
evidence, even though the paper has never been returned to the court, and is
not marked filed, nor recorded in any book kept by the coroner for that purpose.
Where a coroner takes an inquest, the presumption is, that he acted in good faith
and on sufficient cause. In a suit by him, however, to recover his fees, this
presumption is not conclusive; evidence is admissible, that he acted in bad faith,
and knowingly, without sufficient cause or reason. Where a coroner holds an
inquest, at the same time, on several bodies of persons killed in one accident, he is
entitled to fees in each case, for the qualification, drawing and returning of the
inquisition ; also, to the fee in each case, for viewing the body ; and to the fee for.
qualifying the witnesses in each case, and for summoning the jury; but only to one
charge for mileage.” Coroner’s jurors are entitled to one dollar a day when the time .
does not exceed six hours, and when the time exceeds that, to one dollar and fifty
cents, and no mileage.®
II. FoRMS USED IN THE CORONER'S OFFICE.
1. PRECEPT TO SUMMON A JURY.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To the Constable of the Township of S——, in the County of Dauphin:
We command you, immediately upon sight hereof, to summon and warn six good and
lawful men, of- aforesaid, whose names are hereto annexed, to be and appear before
Simeon Dunn, Esquire, coroner of the said county, at ——-, in the county aforesaid, at
—— o’clock —— of this day; then and there to inquire of, do and execute all things as
Bucks, Indiana, Montgomery, Northumberland
and Washington. By act of 19 April 1856, the
compensation in Northampton county is fixed at
$15, unless increased by the commissioners of the
county. Purd. 780 n. See act 18 March 1864, as
to Butler county, Pamph. 60; act 30 January 1866,
Pamph. 6, as to Schuylkill and Mercer counties
(which, however, is repealed as to Schuylkill
county, by act 28 June 1871, Pamph. 1380); and
act 11 April 1866, as to Allegheny county.
Pamph. 602.
" 13 Penn. St. 462-5. 4 Ibid. 270.
2 26 Ibid. 156.
3 34 Penn. St. 301.
4 Purd. 402, See 2 Del. Co. R. 446.
5 See act of 9 March 1867, as to the fees of the
coroner of Allegheny county. Pamph. 382. This
was extended to Schuylkill county, by act 26
March 1868, Pamph. 495; and to Bucks county,
by act 1 April 1868, Pamph. 554, The fees of
the coroner of Cambria county are fixed by act
21 March 1868. Pamph. 412,
6 100 Penn. St. 624.
7 1 Chest. Co. R. 416.
8 Act 11 June 1879. Purd. 402.
296 CORONER.
on our behalf shall be lawfully given them in charge, touching the death of Cc. re aa
be you then and there, to certify what you shall have done in the premises, and further
to do and execute what in our behalf shall be then and there enjoined you.
Given under the hand and seal of our said coroner, at ——;the —— day of ——, A. D.
1882, Simzon Dunn, Coroner. [sEat.]
2. OatH [oR AFFIRMATION] OF FOREMAN.
You do swear [or “ solemnly, sincerely and truly declare and affirm’’], that you will
diligently inquire and true presentment make, on the behalf of the commonwealth, how
and in what manner C. D. [or ‘‘a person unknown,” as the case may be], here lying
dead, came to his death ; and of such other matters relating to the same as shall be lawfully
required of you, according to the evidence offered to you or arising from the inspection
of the body. So help you God [or, “and so you affirm”).
After the foreman is sworn [or affirmed], the rest may be sworn [or affirmed ]
together, as follows:
“You and every of you do swear [or affirm], that such oath [or affirmation] as your
foreman hath for his part taken, you and every of you shall well and truly observe and
keep on your parts respectively. So help you God,” [or “and so you affirm’’].
3. SuBPa@NaA.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To T. B., D. O., K. M. and §. P., greeting: :
We command you and every of you that, all business and excuses whatsoever being
laid aside, you do in your proper persons appear before A. B., Esquire, coroner of the
county of Dauphin, and an inquest now sitting at , in the said county, to testify
the truth and give such information and evidence as you and every of you shall know,
touching the manner in which C. D. [or “ a certain person unknown’, there lying dead,
came to his death; and touching all other matters in relation to which you shall be
examined. And this you are in no wise to omit, under the penalty that may ensue.
Witness the hand and seal of the said A. B., at ——, the —— day of , a. D. 1882,
A. B., Coroner. [sEat.]
4, OatTH OF A WITNESS ON A CORONER’S INQUEST.
You do swear that the evidence you shall give to this inquest, touching the death of
C. D. [or “ the person whose body has been viewed’’], shall be the truth, the whole truth,
and nothing but the truth, so help you God.
5. INQUISITION OF MURDER,
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
Dauphin County,
An inquisition indented and taken at ——, in the county of Dauphin, the day of
, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and eighty-two, before me,
Simeon Dunn, coroner of the county aforesaid, upon the view of the body of A. D., then
and there lying dead, upon the oaths of C. D., E. F., &c., and solemn affirmations of K. L.,
M. N., &e., good and lawful men of the county aforesaid ; who being sworn and affirmed
to inquire, on the part of the commonwealth, when, where, how and after what manner the
said A. D. came to his death, do say, upon their oath and affirmation, that one A. M., late
of —— aforesaid, gentleman [this word gentleman, and other words following, printed in
italic, should be varied according to the facts of the case], not having the fear of God before
his eyes, but being moved and seduced by the instigation of the devil, on the-—— day of
, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and eighty-two, at the —— hour
in the night of the same day, with force and arms, at , in the county aforesaid, in and
upon the aforesaid A. D., then and there being in the peace of God and of the said com-
monwealth, feloniously, violently and of his malice aforethought, made an assault; and
that the aforesaid A. M., then and there, with a certain sword, made of iron and steel, of
the value of one dollar, which he, the said A. M., then and there held in his right hand, the
aforesaid A. D., in and upon the left part of the belly of the said A. D., a little above
the navel of the said A. D., then and there violently, feloniously, voluntarily and of his
malice aforethought, struck and pierced, and gave to the said A. D., then and there, with
sword aforesaid, in and upon the aforesaid left part of the belly of the said A. D., a little
above the navel of the said A. D., one mortal wound, of the breadth of half an inch, and
of the depth of three inches, of which said mortal wound the aforesaid A. D. then and there
instantly died ; so the said A, M. then and there feloniously killed and murdered the said
A. D., against the peace and dignity of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
Le
CORPORATIONS. 297
_ And the said jurors further say, upon their oath and affirmation aforesaia [as follows
in this paragraph, or as the case may be], that A. A., of ——, yeoman, and B. A., of ——,
yeoman, were feloniously present with drawn swords at the time of the murder and felony
aforesaid, in form aforesaid committed; that is to say, on the said —— day of ——, in
the year aforesaid, at —— aforesaid, in the county aforesaid, at the first hour of the night
of the same day; then and there comforting, abetting and aiding the said A. M. to do
and commit the felony and murder aforesaid, in manner aforesaid, against the peace and
dignity of said commonwealth.
_ In witness whereof, as well the aforesaid coroner, as the jurors aforesaid, have to this
inquisition put their hands and seals, on the day and year and at the place first above
mentioned. Simeon Dunn, Coroner. [szau.
C. D., SEAL,
E. F., &e., SEAL,
Jurors,
For other forms of inquisition, see Graydon’s Forms 315-16, and Dunlap’s
Forms 273-6.
Corporations.
I. Erection of corporations, and corporate pow- III. Suits by and against corporations.
ers. IV. Forms of process.
Il. By-laws of corporations. V. Provisions of the Penal Code.
I. A Corporation is a body politic, or incorporated, so called as the persons are
made into a body, and of capacity to take and grant, &c., or it is an assembly
and joining together of many into one fellowship and brotherhood, whereof one is
head and chief, and the rest are the body, and this head and body, knit together,
make the corporation; also, it is constituted of several members, like unto the
natural body, and framed by fiction of law to endure in perpetual succession (or
for a certain limited time).
Corporations, in Pennsylvania, are either created directly by act of assembly or
by the courts, in accordance with certain principles, and for certain purposes laid
down in a previous law, within the provisions of which certain persons associate ;
and it being certified by the proper authorities that the association have, in all
respects, complied with the conditions and requirements of the law, they, the asso-
ciators, are, for the purposes expressed in their articles of association, declared and
acknowledged as a corporation, and granted the powers and immunities appertaining
to such associations.”
A charter of incorporation cannot be declared void in a collateral suit; it can
only be vacated by a scire factas to repeal it, or on a suit of quo warranto at the
suit of the commonwealth.*
A corporation has no other powers than such as are specifically granted by the
act of incorporation, or are necessary for the purpose of carrying into effect the
powers expressly granted. A statute restraining any person from doing certain acts,
applies equally to corporations or bodies politic, although not mentioned.t A corpo-
ration derives all its powers from its charter, and from it the duties, obligations and
liabilities of its officers are to be collected.
A corporation may, without seal, enter into a contract express, or even implied.®
The seal of a corporation is prima facie evidence that the contract has been duly
entered into by ‘hem.
By the comity of nations, foreign corporations are permitted to make contracts
within their jurisdiction, when not contrary to the known policy of the state, nor
injurious to its interests.® A corporation may be a trustee.®
1 Bac. Abr. 64S & R16 2W.&8.74. 1 WN. C.%,
2 Purd. 405, 40. Q
31 R. 426. 768. & R. 16.
415 Johns. 358. 27 Penn. St. 339. 75 Ibid. 8 1 Pars.180. A foreign corporation may take
291. a mortgage upon land in this state, as security
53 P. & W. 502. A corporation, howover, for aloan of money. 91 Penn. St.491. 8 W.N.
possesses such incidental powers as are expedient C. 430.
and necessary for effecting the primary object of 9» Bright.320. 4 Clark 39.
its creation, 4 W. N.C. 33.
298 CORPORATIONS.
The powers of 4 private corporation, which has not accepted any beneficial legis.
lation under the constitution of 1874, are not affected by its provisions, nor by an
act passed in pursuance thereof! The
date of a deed is prima facie evidence of the time of delivery, but it is not conclu-
sive§ From the fact of signing the jury may presume the sealing and delivery,
although there be no reference to sealing in the body of the writing, if there
be a seal affixed to the name.’ The pesumption of the delivery of a deed, arising
from the fact of its being recorded, is one that may be rebutted and destroyed
by counter-evidence.®
Where there is a contract of purchase, or an equity of any sort, pre-existing in
the grantee, the law will, in behalf of creditors, carry back the delivery, by rela-
tion, to the date of the deed. But it is otherwise, as to a voluntary conveyance ;
actual delivery, in such case, is essential to vest any interest in the land.® Wherea
party produces a deed from a third person, purporting on its face to have been duly
executed and acknowledged, the possession of it, by the grantee, or by the person
producing it, is prim@ facie evidence of delivery.
If a grantor execute a deed and retain it in his possession, and the grantee
request its delivery to a third person, and the grantor give the deed to such third
person, to be handed over to the grantee, when he calls for the same, it is in law a
delivery of the deed, though not handed over to the grantee and found among the
rantee’s papers after his death.™
g pap
tg Thomas’ Oo, Litt. 263 (224). 2 BI. Com.
2107 Penn. St. 395,
31 Dall. 64. 18. &R. 72.
415. & R. 72.
5 Act 19 May 1893, Purd. 646, 2 Binn. 497.
4 Ibid. 140. In Philadelphia, by act 25 May
1878, deeds are only valid as against subse-
quent purchasers and mortgagees, from the date
A deed executed by husband and wife, for lands
of record. Purd. 648. But sheriffs’ deeds are
not within the act. 13 W. N.C. 95.
61P. & W. 402.
728 Penn. St. 413.
8 34 Ibid. 252.
9 36 Ibid. 383,
10 27 Ibid. 30.
11 26 Ibid, 422,
DEEDS. 329
of the wife, but not delivered in her lifetime, cannot be rendered effectual to pass
the estate, as against the heirs of the wife, by a delivery after her decease.!
It is not necessary for a witness making probate of a deed, to sign the probate ;
the certificate of the magistrate is sufficient? The certificate should state the official
character of the officer, but if it do not, it may be proved adiunde? A grantee in a.
deed which has been duly acknowledged, is at liberty, if the acknowledgment be
not satisfactory, to make probate of it by a subscribing witness.‘
A justice of the peace cannot take an acknowledgment of a deed out of his
proper county. He is required to indorse on the deed a certificate of the acknow-
ledgment.® A justice bound to make title by a conveyance from a third person, is
incompetent to receive the acknowledgment of the grantor’s wife.” It must appear
by the justice’s certificate, that the wife was examined separate and apart from her
husband* Buta privy examination is not requisite ; it is sufficient, that the hus-
band be absent, although it takes place in the presence of others.®
The wife will be presumed to have been of full age, unless the contrary be shown.!?
If it do not appear that the contents of the deed were made known to the wife, the
acknowledgment: is invalid, and the wife's title does not pass." The certificate
ought to state substantially that the wife was separately examined; that she had a
knowledge of the nature and consequences of the act she was about to perform ;
and that her will, in the performance of it, was free.’ It is sufficient, if the certifi-
cate state that she voluntarily assented to the deed ;* or did voluntarily seal and
acknowledge ;!* or that she freely executed, &c.*
It must appear by the certificate, in some way, that she executed the deed, with-
out any coercion or compulsion of her husband."
Defects in the certificate cannot be aided by parol testimony.” Nor can it be con-
tradicted, except in cases of fraud and imposition ;* or, of concealed duress of the
wife.® Ifthe husband use his influence and power over the wife, in such manner
as to control her unduly, and so as to make her act under Avs will, and not her own,
the deed is void. The certificate of the magistrate is conclusive in favor of one
who accepted it in good faith, and paid his money, without knowing, or having
reason to suspect, that it is untrue.” In such cases, knowledge of the falsity of the
certificate ought to be brought home to the grantee, or of such facts as are suffi-
cient to put him on the inquiry ;# this doctrine, however, is not applicable to the
case of a mortgagee of a married woman’s property ; a justice’s certificate of
the wife’s separate acknowledgment, which is false in fact, will confer no rights on
a mortgagee.” But if the certificate be false in fact, and the grantee knew it, or
knew of circumstances which should put an honest and prudent man upon inquiry,
then it may be contradicted by parol evidence. When the certificate is overthrown
by evidence that the examination was in the presence of the husband, or that the
wife was not properly informed as to the nature of the transaction, or that she was
under the influence of fraud or coercion, it goes for nothing.”
Until delivery of the deed, the wife may revoke her assent, notwithstanding the
acknowledgment.
A deed not executed in conformity with the act of 1770, will not pass the wife’s
right of dower. A deed by a married woman conveying her separate estate, to
which her husband is not a party, is void ;* and so is a release of dower.” And
1 34 Penn. St. 24. 37 [bid. 87. Astowhatfacts 8 6 Binn. 435.
are sufficient to rebut the presumption of the de- 14 3 Whart. 457.
livery of a deed, arising from the fact of its being 1 Pet. C. C. 188, 453.
recorded, see 34 Penn. St. 252. 16 6S. & R. 143-5.
25 W.& S. 223. 17 1 Binn. 470. 9S. & R. 268. 15 Ibid. 72.
3118. & R. 347, 13 Ibid. 386. 7 W. 334. 18158. &R.72. 3 Whart. 457.
15 Penn. St. 452. 23 Ibid. 231. 19 9 Penn. St. 14,
* 23 Penn. St. 247. 20 27 Ibid. 22. 51 Ibid. 289.
578. &R.43. 1 Ash. 131. 21 16 Ibid. 451.
6 1 Binn. 480. 9S. & R. 273. 22 38 Ibid. 334.
77 W. 227, 28 27 Ibid. 22.
® 1 Binn, 470. 5S. & R. 289, 584. 9 Ibid. 24 13 Ibid. 85.
268. % 2 Binn, 341, 58. & R. 289. 7 Ibid. 43. 15
958. & R. 523-34. Ibid. 72.
1 Pet. C. C. 452, 26 16 Penn. St. 484.
N6S.&R.49. 14Ibid. 84. 15 Ibid. 72. 27 Thid. 287.
248. & BR. 272. 27 Penn. St. 22.
330 DEEDS.
the act of 1848 has not altered the law in this respect;! that act only applies
to cases where the husband, by the wife’s authority, undertakes to transfer or
incumber her estate; it makes no change in the form of acknowledgment where
both join in the deed.? The record of a deed is constructive notice to all mankind.
When a party executes a deed with a blank in it, which is afterwards filled up, with
his assent, and he subsequently acknowledges the deed, it is valid, the filling up of
the blank will not avoid it* Ifa deed which has been executed and acknowledged
by the grantor, with a blank for the grantee’s name, be surreptitiously and fraudu-
lently taken from the grantee’s house, and the blank filled up, no title passes
thereby ; and a bond fide purchaser, for a valuable consideration, stands in no better
situation than such fraudulent holder, especially, if the original grantor remain in
possession of the property.®
A deed so acknowledged or proven, as to be properly admitted to record, is
admissible in evidence, without further proof of execution.® The registry of a deed,
defectively proved or acknowledged, is not evidence of notice to a subsequent pur-
chaser.’?. The recording of an instrument not within the purview of the recording
acts, will not make a certified copy of it legal evidence.®
Where two deeds are made, of different dates, from the same grantor to different
persons, neither of which is recorded within six months, that which is first recorded
will take priority.®
An alteration in a deed, by a party claiming under it, after its execution, will
render it void.® Thus the addition of subscribing witnesees, if fraudulently done,
without the consent of one of the parties, will avoid it as to him." An dnterlineation
in a deed, in the absence of testimony, is presumed to have been made before exe-
eution; for, if altered afterwards, it would be a fraud, which is never to be pre-
sumed.!* Where a deed, bond or other instrument is offered with an interlineation
or erasure that is material, it is a question for the jury under all the circumstances,
whether the alteration were made before or after signature’ The conveyance of
an estate which lies in livery, and not in grant, is not avoided by an alteration
in a material part of it; for the title being vested by a deed having by statute the
force of livery of seisin, can be revested only by a reconveyance. But an alteration
of a bond, bill or note, stands on a different principle. When it is made by a vol-
untary act of the creditor, and increases or injuriously affects the responsibility of
the debtor, whatever the motive for it, the security is gone.
1 18 Penn. St. 506. 19 Ibid. 361. 25 Ibid.326. Penn. St.9. 3 Gr. 429.
27 Ibid. 213. 1015 Penn. St. 462, 20 Ibid. 12. 1 Greenl.
2 24 Ibid. 253. 25 Ibid. 142. Evid. 3 564-8,
81 Y. 173. 1 8 Penn. St. 378, 518.
44 Bing. 123. 1 Greenl. Evid. 2 568 a, 12°15 Penn. St. 281. 2 Eng. L. & Eq. 102. 1
6 4 Whart. 382. Greenl. Evid. 3 564, n.4. Math. Pr. Ev. 39.
6 4 Penn. St. 13. 5 Gilm. 376. 15 23 Penn. St. 249. 32 Ibid. 423. 67 Ibid. 9.
73 Y,.186. 2 Binn.40. 5 Penn. St. 145. 14 19 Ibid. 122. 27 Ibid. 244. 35 Ibid. 80. And
84R. 444, 7W.&S.16. 35 Penn. St. 269. see 31 Ibid. 322.
210 W. 407. 4W.&58. 307. 5 Ibid. 49. 54
Sevaeatiee abs
[ 331 ]
Defalcation,
I. The statutes regulating set-off. III. Of the subject-matter of set-off.
II. Between what parties set-off may be allowed. IV. Of set-off before a justice of the peace,
I. STATUTES REGULATING SET-OFF,
Ir two or more dealing together be indebted to each other upon bonds, bills,
bargains, promises, accounts or the like, and one of them commence an action in
any court of this province, if the defendant cannot gainsay the deed, bargain or
assumption upon which he is sued, it shall be lawful for such defendant to plead
payment of all or part of the debt or sum demanded, and give any bond, bill,
receipt, account or bargain in evidence; and if it shall appear that the defendant
hath fully paid or satisfied the debt or sum demanded, the jury shall find for the
defendant, and judgment shall be entered that the plaintiff shall take nothing by
his writ, and shall pay the costs; and if it shall appear that any part of the sum
demanded be paid, then so much as is found to be paid shall be defalked, and the
plaintiff shall have judgment for the residue only, with costs of suit. But if it
appear to the jury that the plaintiff is overpaid, then they shall give in their verdict
for the defendant, and withal certify to the court how much they find the plaintiff
to be indebted or in arrear to the defendant, more than will answer the debt or sum
demanded, and the sum or sums 80 certified shall be recorded with the verdict, and
shall be deemed as a debt of record.?
In all cases where, by the verdict of a jury, any debt or damages shall have been
found or certified in favor of the defendant, he shall be entitled to judgment and
execution in like manner as if the verdict were in favor of the plaintiff?
A defendant who shall neglect or refuse in any case to set off his demand,
whether founded upon bond, note, penal or single bill, writing obligatory, book
account or damages on assumption, against a plaintiff, which shall not exceed the
sum of one hundred dollars, before a justice of the peace, shall be, and is hereby,
for ever barred from recovering against the party plaintiff by any after-suit: but
in case of judgment by default, the defendant, if he has any account to set off
against the plaintiff’s demand, shall be entitled to a rehearing before the justice,
within thirty days, on proof being made, either on oath or affirmation of the de-
fendant, or other satisfactory evidence, that the defendant was absent when the
process was served, and did not return home before the return-day of such process,
or that he was prevented by sickness of himself, or other unadvoidable cause ; and
the justice shall have power to render judgment for the balance in favor of the
plaintiff or defendant, as justice may require.*
II. BETWEEN WHAT PARTIES.
Debts which can be set off must be such as are due in the same right.‘ It may
be stated as a general rule, that the person having the right of action may set off a
debt due to him as a trustee, against a debt due by him in his own right.®
It is not essential, that the defendant should be able to sue for the demand in his
own name.®
The defalcation act of Pennsylvania has uniformly been construed to admit of a
set-off, either by or against an executor or administrator.7 In an action by an
administrator, on a promissory note given by the defendant to him, for the purchase-
money of goods of the intestate sold by the plaintiff to the defendant, the defendant
cannot set off a debt due by the intestate to him?
1 Act of 1705 3 1. Purd. 668. Thid. 93. 43 Ibid. 79, 51 Ibid. 418.
2 Act 11 April 1848 3 12. Purd. 669. 68. & R. 244,
8 Act 20 March 1810 @ 7. Ibid. 1134. 3 RB. 135.
d
3P. & W. 492. 13 Penn. St. 158. 17 Ibid. 181. 8. & R.10. 12.Penn. St. 64. 99 Ibid.
5
6
€2Y.208. 4 Ibid. 461. 4W.15. 2R.111. 7 Ibid.
8 10
83 Ibid. 102. 34 Ibid. 239. 37 Ibid. 456. 38 191.
‘
339 DEFALCATION.
A surviving partner, sued as such, may set off a debt due by the plaintiff to him
in his individual capacity" One of two defendants may set off a debt due to
him by the plaintiff, unless there be some superior equity in a third person. But
a debt due by the plaintiff to a co-obligor not summoned cannot be set off against
the joint debi.®
A debt due from the plaintiff to the defendant, and another, who was not sum-
moned, is a good set-off against the plaintiff’s demand on the obligor who is
summoned.* In an action by two or more administrators, the defendant cannot set
off a debt due to himself by one of the administrators unconnected with the estate
in right of which the action is brought.6 Jn an action by A., the defendant cannot
set off an account for goods sold to A. B. as partners. In an action brought for
the use of three persons, the defendant cannot set off a separate claim against each
of them.’
A debtor may set off « debt due him by his creditor at the time of his death,
though the estate of the creditor be insolvent.®
Set-off is only allowable in favor of a defendant; consequently there can be no
such thing as set-off against set-off.2 Set-off is allowed in order to prevent multi-
plicity of actions, and ought not to be allowed so as to be the cause of new disputes.”
An action on a due-bill, not negotiable, assigned to a third party, long after its
date, is to be regarded as between the original parties, and subject to every legal
set-off the maker may have against the payee.”
In an action by one of several partners for his individual debt, an unsettled claim
against the firm cannot be set off, even though it arose out of the same transac-
ticn.7?
III. SupsEcT-MATTER OF SET-OFF.
It seems, that in all cases where the cause of action, which the defendant wishes
to set off, arises from the same transaction on which the plaintiff founds his action,
it may be defalked. Equitable as well as legal demands may be set off in Penn-
sylvania.
One judgment may be set off against another, when both are in the same right,
though in different courts ;* but this cannot be done before a justice.® It is only
permitted where it will infringe on no other right of equal grade; consequently, it
is not permitted to affect an equitable assignee for value.”
In an action to recover the price of cattle, the defendant may give in evidence,
by way of set-off or equitable defence, that he had sustained damage by reason of
the plaintiff not having delivered to him certain sheep purchased by him, at the
same time, of the plaintiff, in an entire coutract.® Unliquidated cross-demands,
arising out of a distinct contract, may be set off under our statute.!®
A debt not due at the commencement of the suit, cannot be set off. A plea of
set-off cannot be supported by a defendant upon a claim against the plaintiff,
acquired after the institution of the suit.
Buying the plaintiff's paper before action brought, entitles the plaintiff to set off.”
But the mere possession of a note, which is offered as a set-off, is not evidence that
it belonged to the defendant at the commencement of the suit; it is incumbent on
him to show that it was acquired in proper time.*
In an action on a promissory note given by the defendants in favor of the plain-
tiff, it was held, that the defendants might set off a debt due by the plaintiff toa
1118. &R. 48, 11S. & R. 477.
212 Ibid. 252, 2 R.121. 13 Penn. St. 603. ™ 3 Binn. 135. 88. &R. 88,
Seo 54 Ibid. 508. | 1 3 Y.132. 1M. 10.
898. & R. 379. 16 46 Penn. St. 519.
42R. 121, 17 2 W. 228. 10 W.N. C. 387,
5 Ibid. 111. 1% 128. & R. 275,
6148. & R. 300. 191 Dall. 452. 5 W. 51. 4 W. & S. 290. 5
77 W. 344, Thid. 459. 6 Ibid. 150, 159 179, 439, 29 Penn.
8 8 Penn. St. 403, 23 Ibid. 167. St. 192. 59 Ibid. 450. 86 Ibid. 287.
94 W.& 8.19. 1 Penn. St. 501, 13 Ibid. % 3 Dall. 505. 1 W.& 8.418. 29 Penn. St. 192
181. 48 Ibid. 512. 54 Ibid. 154, 219 W. 126. 22 Penn, St. 116. 29 Ibid. 192.
10 31 Penn. St. 72. 221 Dall. 452. See 43 Penn. St. 70.
M 29 Ibid. 475. 33 22 Penn. St. 116. 29 Ibid. 192.
12 37 Ibid. 456. 89 Ibid. 392,
DEFALCATION. 833
company or partnership of which the defendants were members, the other members
of the company or partnership authorizing the same,
A set-off is not admissible, where the demand against the plaintiff arises from an
act done by him, of a tortious nature. But the defendant may give evidence of acts
of nonfeasance or misfeasance by the plaintiff, where these acts are immediately
connected with the plaintif’’s cause of action, such evidence not being admitted by
way of defalcation, but for the purpose of defeating, in whole or in part, the plain-
tiff’s cause of action.?
In an action for services performed by the plaintiff, as housekeeper, and also for
goods sold and delivered, evidence of acts of malfeasance by the plaintiff, in embez-
zling the property of the defendant, is not admissible by way of set-off, but may be
given under the plea of non asswmpsit and payment with leave, &.®
The pendency of a suit to recover the claim offered to be set off, is no objection
to its being used for that purpose.* The set-off is in the nature of a cross-action,
and it may be withdrawn from the consideration of the jury?
A defendant cannot avail himself by way of set-off of a debt against the plaintiff
for which a suit is pending on an appeal from arbitrators, by the party offering such
set-off® The defendant having a demand against the plaintiff, is not compelled by
the defalcation act to set it off; he may do so, or he may bring an action against the
plaintiff for it, as he pleases."
Mutual demands do not necessarily extinguish each other by operation of law—
set-off is permissive, not compulsory; and if there be no agreement between the
parties, either may hold and set off his claim; or if he choose, assign it, and leave
the other party to his legal remedy.® Parties having mutual demands against
each other, may, by their agreement, extinguish them by a set-off; but the statute
of defaleation does not, by any operation, per se, apply the demand of’ one party, in
such case, against that of the other, so as to produce either a payment, satisfaction,
or extinguishment of them.® On appeal, the defendant cannot set off a claim above
$300.
IV. SEvT-oFF BEFORE A JUSTICE.
The 7th section of the act 20th March 1810, which compels a defendant in a suit
before a justice to set off his demand against the plaintiff, is applicable to cases of
unliquidated damages for breach of contract.?
In an action before a justice of the peace to recover the price of goods sold and
delivered, defendant may give in evidence, as a set-off, a special contract between
him and plaintiff, by which plaintiff promised to do certain work for defendant, and
did not, whereby defendant is entitled to recover damages for the nonfeasance.’?
When a defendant claims a right to off-set a demand which he had against the
plaintiff for a sum exceeding $300, the justice.is right in rejecting the evidence of
such off-set, on the ground that it exceeds, in amount, his jurisdiction ; but if the
demand of the defendant be composed of several items, he may set off such of them
as do not exceed the jurisdiction of the justice.’
Where a justice of peace issues his process, which is served, according to law, on
a defendant, the latter cannot turn round and sue the plaintiff before another jus-
tice, for any debt or demand arising from contract not exceeding $300; but must
submit the claim by way of set-off to the justice before whom the plaintiff has
brought his suit. If, however, both suits be carried on at the same time, without
‘objection, both proceedings are valid.¥
A justice cannot set off against a judgment on his docket, a larger judgment
before another justice.’
15 Whart. 379. 9 9 Ibid. 179.
25 8. & R.122. 14 Ibid. 439. 2 Whart.95. 19 48 Penn. St. 456.
‘SIbid. 150. 4 Ibid. 226. 84 Penn. St. 319. 11 15 Penn. St. 361.
845, & R. 249. 2 4W.& 8.290. 6 Ibid. 155. 15 Penn. St. 362
48W. 444. 1W. 4S. 57. 18 3 P. & W. 469. 37 Penn. St. 456,
5 5 W. & 8.506, MJ Ash. 171. 2 Ibid. 146. 5 W. & S. 480.
8 5 W. 116. 18 27 Penn. St. 71.
7 7 Ibid. 500. 16 46 Ibid. 519.
® 8 Ibid. 39, 260, 406. 2W. & 8. 70.
[ 334 J
Dentists.
Tue act 17th April 1876 prescribes the qualifications of persons ‘entitled to prac-
tice dentistry in this state; and provides for their examination by a competent
board, of which a record is to be made. And by the sixth section of the act, if
any person shall practice dentistry, within the state, in violation of the act, he shall
be liable to indictment, and shall, on conviction, be fined not less than $50, nor more
than $200; and any fee paid to him may be recovered back.’
The act 20th June 1883 provides for the recording of dentists’ diplomas and cer-
tificates and of the affidavits of those persons who, by the act of 1876, are entitled
to practice without a certificate ; that is, those who at that time had been engaged
in continuous practice, for three years or more. And the fourth section provides,
that any person who shall violate or fail to comply with any of the provisions of
either of the said acts, or should cause to be recorded any diploma or certificate,
fraudulently obtained, or in whole or in part a forgery, or shall make any false
statement to be recorded as aforesaid, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and on con-
viction, be sentenced to pay a fine of not less than $50 nor more than $200 for such
offence, for the use of the proper county.”
The practice of dentistry is uow regulated by the act of 10th June 1893. Purd. 672.
Mesertion,
I. Statutory provisions. II. Judicial decisions.
I. Act 13 June 1836. Purd. 674.
Szor. 28. If any man shall separate himself from his wife, without reasonable
cause, or shall desert his children, or if any wounan shall desert her children, leav-
ing them a charge upon the district, in any such case, it shall be lawful for any
two magistrates of the county,? upon complaint made by the overseers of the’ dis-
trict, to issue their warrant to such overseers, therein authorizing them to take and
seize so much of the goods and chattels, and receive so much of the rents
and profits of the real estate of such man or woman, as, in the judgment of the said
magistrates, shall be sufficient to provide for such wife, and to maintain and bring
up such children, which sum or amount shall be specified in such warrant; but if
sufficient real or personal estate cannot be found, then to take the body of such man
(or woman), and bring him (or her) before such magistrates, at a time to be speci-
fied in such warrant.
Sror. 29. It shall be lawful for such magistrate, on the return of such warrant,
to require security from such man or woman, for his or her appearance at the next
court of quarter sessions of the county, there to abide the order of the court; and
for want of such security, to commit such person to the jail of the county.*
Sxcr. 30. The warrant aforesaid shall be returned to the next vourt of quarter
sessions of the county, when it shall be lawful for the said court to make an order,
for the payment of such sums as they shall think reasonable, for the purpose
aforesaid, and therein authorizing the overseers to dispose of the goods and chat-
tels aforesaid, by sale or otherwise, and to collect and receive the rents and profits
aforesaid, or so much of either as, in the judgment of the court, shall be sufficient
for the purpose aforesaid; but if there be no real or personal estate, it shall be
lawful for the court, to commit such person to the jail of the county, there to remain
until he or she comply with such order, give security for the performance thereof,
or be discharged by due course of law.®
™ Purd 671. tion cases, by act 26 March 1846. Pamph. 173.
2 Thid. 672. 5 The act 31 March 1812, 5 Sm. 393, relating
2 The act extends to Philadelphia. 14 Phila. to the oity of Philadelphia, &c., is not hereby
361. And proceedings may be had before one repealed. 2 Penn. St. 138. 3 Clark 139. And
magistrate, by act 14 April 1853 38. Pamph.418. see act 11 April 1848, relating to the city of Pitts-
« In Philadelphia, one judge may act in deser- burgh. Pamph. 532,
DESERTION. : 835
Aor 13 Apri 1867. Purd. 675.
Sxor. 1. In addition to the remedies now provided by law, if any husband or
father, being within the limits of this commonwealth, has or hereafter shall separate
himself from his wife, or from his children, or from wife and children, without
reasonable cause, or shall neglect to maintain wife or children, it shall be lawful for
any alderman, justice of the peace or magistrate of this commonwealth, upon
information made before him, under oath or affirmation, by his wife or children, or
either of them, or by any other petson or persons, to issue his warrant to the sheriff,
or to any constable, for the arrest of the person against whom the information shall
be made as aforesaid, and bind him over, with one sufficient surety, to appear at
the next court of quarter sessions, there to answer the said charges of desertion.
Sxzcr. 2. The information, proceedings thereon, and warrant shall be returned to
the next court of quarter sessions,? when it shall be lawful for said court, after
hearing, to order the person against whom complaint has been made, being of sufli-
cient ability, to pay such sum as said court shall think reasonable and proper, for
the comfortable support and maintenance of the said wife or children, or both, not
exceeding one hunded dollars per month, and to commit such person to the county
prison, there to remain until he comply with such order, or give security, by one or
more sureties, to the commonwealth, and in such sum as’ the court shall direct for
the compliance therewith.
Sct. 3. The costs of all proceedings by virtue of this act, shall be the same as
are now allowed by law in cases of surety of the peace, to be imposed in like manner ;
and all proceedings shall be in the name of the commonwealth ; and any wife, so
deserted, shall be a competent witness on the part of the commonwealth, and the
husband shall also be a competent witness.
Secor. 4. Should any such person abscond, remove or be found in any other
county of the commonwealth than the one in which said warrant issued, he may be
arrested therein, by the said warrant being backed by any alderman or justice of
the peace of the county in which such person may be found, as is now provided
for backing warrants, by the third section of the act of the 31st of March 1860.
Act 15 Aprin 1869. Purp. 676.
Secr. 1. Whenever the court of quarter sessions of any county in the common-
wealth shall, under the second section of the act to which this is a supplement,
commit the person complained of to the county prison, there to remain until
he comply with their order, or give security, &c., it shall be lawful for the said
court, at any time after three months, if they shall be satisfied of the inability of
such person to comply with the said order, and give such security, to discharge him
from imprisonment.
II. A husband who, by cruel usage, compels his wife to withdraw from his hab-
itation, is liable to proceedings for desertion under the act of 18363 The reason-
able cause which relieves a husband from a warrant, is only such as will relieve
him from the legal duty of maintenance; and he can only be relieved from the main-
tenance of his wife, for reasons in causes that would entitle him toa divorce.* The
wife, in such case, is a competent witness to prove the marriage.® :
It is not necessary that a wife and child should be declared paupers, in due form
of law, to authorize proceedings against the husband for maintenance. Under the
act of 1836, the complaint must be made by the overseers, not by the wife J but
the proceedings may be instituted on an information made by a single overseer.*
The law considers the desertion as an offence ;® and the defendant is not entitled
1 Tt has been determined, that all prior local return to the city solicitor. Purd. 676.
acts were repealed, by implication, by the general 3 2 Clark 75.
law of 1867. 13 Phila. 529. And see 71 Penn. 42Gr.162. 1 Luz. L. Reg. 221.
St. 416. 5 2 Brewst. 149.
2 It is not absolutely necessary that the infor- 6 2 Gr. 162.
mation should be returned, if the transcript set 72 Penn. St. 138. 61 Ibid. 105. And see 2
forth that a proper information has been filed. 15 §. & R. 363. 2 Bro. 212,
Phila. 414. By act 9 April 1872, the magistrates 848. & R. 506.
of Philadelphia are required to make monthly 9° 2 Ibid. 363.
\
336 DISTRESS FOR RENT.
to notice, previously to the seizure of his property! The warrant must direct how
much is to be seized! Choses in action are not liable to seizure; otherwise of a
lease for years, which is a chattel real.2 To justify a warrant of arrest, it must
appear that sufficient real or personal estate of the defendant could not be found.’
The right to hold to bail given to one magistrate is auxiliary to the proceedings
before two justices.‘
The defendant hasa right to prove that he had not deserted his wife, but she had
deserted him. The decree does not affect the rights of creditors.6 The proceed-
ings are subject to the revision of the supreme court in certiorari ;’ but not until
after final decree.2 Such decree is not affected by a subsequent discharge under
the insolvent laws, which will only apply to payments then due? ;
It is error, for the quarter sessions, upon the hearing of a defendant who is bound
over to answer a charge of deserting his wife, to order payment of a weekly sum
for the support of his wife, and a further weekly sum for the support of his child;
the order must be limited to the original charge.” It is too late, after a hearing
on the merits, to set aside the warrant for a mere defect of form.”
To confer jurisdiction, under the act of 1867, the act of desertion must have
been committed within the state? But the jurisdiction is not confined to the court
of the county where the defendant has his residence. Ifthe father be really able
and willing to maintain his children at home, he is entitled to their custody.”* The
act is confined to a provision for future maintenance.” The court may make an
order for maintenance, though the parties have separated by agreement, if the wife
has no adequate means of support.® The court may permit the bail to surrender
his principal in discharge of further responsibility.” In case of a surrender, and
payment of all arrearages, the judgment entered on the bond will be ordered to be
satisfied!
rr ooo
,
Distress for Rent.
I. Of the nature of a distress. V. Form of a warrant to distrain.
II. What things are distrainable. VI. Summons to landlord to defalcate.
III. Proceedings on a distress for rent. VII. Proviso in a lease waiving the benefit of the
IV. Mlegal distresses, exemption law.
I. OF THE NATURE OF A DISTRESS.
A DISTRESS is defined to be the taking of a personal chattel out of the possession
of a wrongdoer into the possession of the party injured, to procure a satisfaction
for the wrong committed. But in modern times, the whole policy of the law
respecting distresses has been changed, and a distress for rent is now no more than
a summary method of seizing and selling the tenant’s property, to satisfy the rent
which he owes.” This is a consequence of the statute authorizing the distrainor to
sell the goods distrained for rent, in satisfaction in the amount due to him.”
The right of distress is incident to every reservation of rent, so long as the
reversionary interest remains in the lessor. But where the relation of landlord and
tenant has ceased, by the determination of the lessor’s estate in the demised pre-
mises, and his surrender of possession thereof to the owner of the paramount estate,
1158. & R. 239. Reg. 197.
22 Gr. 162. See act 1 April 1870, as to Schuyl- 1 71 Penn. St. 413. 2 Penny. 506.
kill county. Pamph. 777. 14 64 Penn. St. 302. 71 Ibid. 413. 1 Luz. L.
8 2 Penn, St. 142, 61 Ibid. 105. See 3 Clark Reg. 46.
139, 16-71 Penn. St. 413.
42 Penn. St. 139. 16 2 Pears. 446.
628. & R. 363. 17 90 Ponn, St. 431.
6 § Ibid. 387. 18 12 W.N. C. 292.
7 2 Ibid. 363, 19 2 Bl. Com. 6.
* 2 Poeun, St. 124. 20 Taylor, L. & T. 3 557.
* 5 Whart. 82. See 3 W. N. C. 301, 540. 4 % Act of 21 March 1772. Purd. 1161-2.
Ibid. 533. 22 2 Cow. 652, 660. The act of 1772 author-
10 2 Phila. 155. izes a distress “for any rent reserved and due
Nl 2 Gr. 162. upon any demise, lease or contract whatsoever.”
12 64 Penn. St. 302. 8 Phila, 485. 7 Luz. L. Purd. 1161,
DISTRESS FOR RENT. 837
his right to distrain for rent in arrear is at an end, though the tenant remain on
the premises.’ A ground-rent reserved upon a conveyance in fee is, in Pennsyl-
vania a rent-service, and to all rents-service the right of distress is incident of
common right.’ To authorize a distress for rent, there must be an actual demise,
and not a mere agreement for one.®
To confer the right of distress, there must be a fixed rent reserved, or one that
may be reduced to a certainty.* But it need not be payable in money; it may be
payable in an article of commerce; as in iron;® or in wheat ;® or by any services,
such as daubing and chinking a house, and payment of taxes,? So, where the les.
see covenants to pay the lessor for all gas consumed on the premises, a sum due for
gas consumed is to be regarded as rent in arrear, and may be distrained for.2 So
also, the rent of one-third of the toll of a grist-mill, may be distrained for.® A rent
is deemed certain, so as to give the right of distress, if capable of being rendered
certain..° A reservation of a rent of $7000 perannum, or $6000 upon a certain
contingency, is sufficiently certain to entitle the landlord to his remedy by distress."
So, where a lease reserves a fixed rent in money, and an additional rent of $30 for
each $500 of improvements put on the premises by the lessor, such additional rent
may be distrained for.* The landlord can only distrain for rent in arrear; he can-
not include interest ;* but the remedy by distress for rent is not limited to six
years.* The landlord’s right to distrain after the determination of the term, is
without limitation as to time; the statute gives him this right, wherever the rent
is in arrear, if he retain the title and the tenant continue in possession.®
Rent which, by agreement, is payable in advance, may be distrained for ;* as
soon as it becomes payable by the terms of the demise ; but a distress cannot be
made on the same day the rent becomes due.
II. WHAT THINGS ARE DISTRAINABLE.
It may be laid down as a general rule, that all chattels personal, upon the demised
premises, to whomsoever belonging, are liable to be distrained for rent in arrear,
unless particularly protected or exempted. Thus, the goods of a stranger, upon
the demised premises, may be distrained ;¥ but only whilst they remain on the pre-
mises.7 So, the goods of an under-tenant may be distrained on ;” and those of
one who entered under the lessee, though he hold over, after the determination
of it’ A wife’s separate property may be distrained for rent due by the
husband; the act of 1848 does not alter the law of landlord and tenant.* And
goods demised to the tenant, and used in his business, are liable to distress for the
rent of the realty.*
The act of 1772 empowers a lessor to take and seize as a distress for rent, any
cattle or stock of his tenant, feeding or depasturing upon any part of the demised
premises; and also all sorts of corn and grass, hops, roots, fruits, pulse, or other
product whatsoever, which shall be growing upon any part of the demised pre-
mises; and that the purchaser thereof shall have free egress and regress to and
from the same, when ripe, to cut, gather and carry away the same.* If, however,
the growing grain be sold by the tenant, it is not liable to be distrained before
1 102 Penn. St. 1.
2] Whart. 337. But in 44 Penn. St. 492, the
court determined, that all feudal tenures having
been abolished by the Revolution, a grantor on
ground-rent can only distrain by virtue of the
clause of distress embraced in his deed. This
decision is very learnedly criticized by Mr. Cad-
walader in his Treatise on Ground-Rents, and has
not met the general approval of the profession.
3 2 Taunt. 148. 5 B. & Ald. 322. 2 Cow. 660.
$2S8.& BR. 480. 2 R.12. 3 P.& W. 33. 1
en §. 413. 1 Penn. St. 126. 2 Ibid. 293. See
i
24
i=")
i
an
<<)
- & &. 531,
id. 163,
inn. 228.
Penn. St. 307.
. 11. See 3 Add, 347.
ill 648.
. 134, 22
wes
0
nN
138. & R. 52.
ESeanaan
4
he
bi
3
5
5
1
2
2
5
12 75 Penn. St. 200.
18 6 Johns. 43. 2 Binn. 153.
14 8 Paige 212.
16 35 Penn. St. 162.
116. Purd. 1011.
16 2 Whart. 95. 3 Penn. St. 218. 4 Cow. 576.
6 Ibid. 103. 4 N. Y. 272.
17 1 Den. 113.
186 W.41. 2 Cr. C. C. 579.
19 3 Bl. Com. 7.
20 1R. 435. 74 Penn. St. 387. 88 Ibid. 93. 13
Wend. 256.
211 Dall. 440. 2 Phila. 176. 7 Ibid. 247.
22 9W.N.C. 574. But only upon the demisea
premises, 2 Hill 447. See 97 Penn. St. 136.
28 91 Penn. St. 349.
24 38 Ibid. 344,
% 3 Gr. 248.
26 Purd. 1160.
66 Ibid. 312. 1W.& 5S.
838 DISTRESS FOR RENT.
removal; unless the vendee allow the same to remain uncut for an unreasonable
time after they have become ripe But it has been determined, that trees growing
on the ground of a nurseryman, who is a yearly tenant to the landlord, with the
right to remove them from time to time, are not distrainable under the statute?
There are certain exceptions to the general rule, that all personal chattels are
liable to be distrained for rent. Thus, whatever is in the personal use or occu-
pation of any man is, for the time, privileged and protected from any distress ;* as
an axe with which a man is cutting wood; or a horse, whilst a man is riding him.®
So, a loom cannot be distrained in the hands of the weaver ;* nor wearing apparel,
if in actual use.”
Commodities which cannot be restored upon replevin in the same plight and con-
dition as that in which they were when taken, are not distrainable at common law;
and therefore, the flesh of animals lately slaughtered cannot be distrained ;? so, of
milk, fruit and the like.®
Valuable things in the way of trade are not liable to distress ; as a horse stand-
ing in a smith-shop to be shod, or in a common inn; or cloth at a tailor’s; or corn
sent to a mill or market ;" or goods placed with a commission merchant on storage;”
or goods stored with a warehouseman in the way of trade; or cattle received by a
tenant to be pastured for hire ;!* or goods on the premises of an auctioneer, for the
purpose of sale by auction ; or the goods of a boarder at a boarding-house.* For
all these things are protected and privileged for the benefit of trade, and are sup-
posed, in common presumption, not to belong to the owner of the house, but to his
customer.”
Things annexed to the freehold cannot be distrained, as doors, windows, mill-
stones and the like; for they savor of the realty. So, fixtures which a tenant may
sever from the freehold, and take away during the term, are not therefore distrain-
able for rent. But trade fixtures, slightly attached to the freehold and which may
be removed by the tenant at his pleasure, during the term, without destroying
their character or injuring them, may be distrained; as a spinning-mule fastened
to the floor of a mill with wooden screws. A fixture, however, which has been
severed from the freehold for a temporary purpose, as a mill-stone severed from the
mill, for the purpose of being picked, is not distrainable, whilst so severed.” But
trade fixtures, if separated by the tenant, may be distrained.”
It is also a rule, that goods in the custody of the law cannot be distrained.
Thus, goods which have been previously levied upon, on an execution or foreign
attachment, cannot be distrained for rent.7 But the landlord may distrain upon
goods in the demised premises, which have been previously taken in execution,
and released on an adverse claim and interpleader.% Goods seized by a sheriff,
under a writ of replevin, but left by him, for a reasonable time, upon the demised
premises, cannot be distrained ;* but goods replevied may be distrained for subse-
quent arrears of rent. A landlord has no right to distrain upon the goods of an
insolvent deceased tenant, on the demised premises, in the hands of his adminis-
trator ; they are in the custody of the law.% A landlord’s right to distrain revives,
upon an execution being waived.”
The act of 9th April 1849 likewise exempts from distress for rent, property to
the value of three hundred dollars, exclusive of all wearing apparel of the defend-
ant and his family, and all bibles and school books in use in the family, which had
14W. & 8.346. 74 Penn. St. 387. 23 Wend. 462. And see 87
25 Moore 79. 2 Brod. & Bing. 262. Penn. St. 438,
3 3 Moore 96. 2 Ibid. 491. 8 Taunt. 431. 16 5 Whart. 9. But only such goods of a boarder
4 3 Bl. Com. 8. are exempt as are in his use as a boarder. 8 W.
56 T. R. 138. N. 0. 533. 9 Ibid. 574, See 3 L. R., C. P., 26.
6 Willes 517. 7 3 Bl. Com. 8.
™ 1 Esp. 206. 18 1 Q. C. 895.
8 2 Exch. 101. 19 105 Penn. St. 187, See 6 Exch. 295.
9 3 BL. Com. 9. 2178. &R. 413. 2W. & 8. 116,
10 Thid. 7. But horses and carriages at livery ! 5 Cow, 323.
are notexempt. 4C.B.545, And see3 Binn. %4W. 4&8. 344. 1 Bro. 231,
1498. 1 W. Bl. 483. 23°11 Phila. 313.
13 BI. Com. 7, 2 Ad. & £.138. 3 Q. B. 39. 2% 1 Thid. 173.
12175.& R. 138. 7 W.&S. 452, 6Q.B. 891. % 2 Dall. 68,131. 4 .W. 42.
18 20 Penn. St, 287. 26 26 Pitts. L. J. 113.
14 20 Ibid. 422. 87 Ibid. 438, 27 1 Ld. Ken. 370.
15 8 Exch, 861. 10 C.B.55. 1C.& Mago.
DISTRESS FOR RENT. 339
been exempted by previous statutes! But a sub-tenant or assignee, not recognised
by the landlord, cannot claim the benefit of the exemption, as against a distress for
rent (the goods being levied on as those of the original lessee) ; neither the relation of
landlord and tenant, nor that of debtor and creditor, exists between such parties?
Sewing-machines belonging to seamstresses, and private families, are specially
exempted from distress for rent, by the acts of 1869 and 1870;° and so are leased
pianos, melodeons and organs, by the act of 1876; provided the owner, his agent,
or the lessee give notice to the landlord or his agent, that the instrument is leased or
hired*
®
Goods bond, fide sold by the tenant to an innocent purchaser, cannot be distrained
after the expiration of the term; though such purchaser be the succeeding tenant
and the goods remain on the demised premises. And the property of a tenant, hold-
ing by a renewed lease, is not liable to distress for arrears of rent for the previous
term, if'a third person has acquired an interest in the property. Otherwise, if he
retain the title, and the tenant continue in possession.’ But goods conveyed in
trust to indemnify the landlord and his indorser, against their responsibility, on a
note discounted for the accommodation of the tenant, and left upon the premises,
are not liable to distress for subsequently accruing rent, whilst the liability of the
indorser continues.® i
If the tenant fraudulently or clandestinely carry off from the demised premises
his goods and chattels, with intent to prevent his landlord from distraining the
same for arrears of rent, the act of 1772 makes it lawful for the landlord, within
thirty days thereafter, to take and seize such goods and chattels, as a distress for rent,
wherever the same may found; and to sell and dispose of the same in the same man-
ner as if distrained upon the demised premises.’ Upon this act, it is to be observed,
that a mere removal in the day-time, without the knowledge of the landlord, is not
fraudulent.° That it is only the goods of the tenant that can be so followed and
distrained ; not those of a stranger."' But that those of the tenant’s assignee may
be followed and seized, if clandestinely removed.!? The act also protects the tenant’s
goods, although fraudulently removed, after a bond fide sale to an innocent pur-
chaser.¥ It is a trespass to enter the house of a stranger, to search for and distrain
goods fraudulently removed, if no goods of the tenant be there found. If the goods
of the tenant be once fairly and openly removed, or if clandestinely removed and
thirty days elapse, or if fairly sold to an innocent purchaser, although such
purchaser be the succeeding tenant, and the goods yet remain upon the land, they
cannot be distrained by the landlord for rent.° If the tenant’s goods be fraudulently
removed, they are prima facte liable to be distrained ; and it is for the claimant
to show affirmatively that he is a bond fide purchaser without notice of the fraud.”
In the city of Philadelphia, the like remedy is given to a landlord of following
‘and distraining upon goods fraudulently removed by his tenant, before the rent
becomes due, by the act of 25th March 1825. But in such case the rent is to be
apportioned up to the time of such removal; and the landlord is required first to
make oath, before a judge, alderman or justice, that he verily believes the said
goods were carried away for the purpose of defrauding him of his remedy by
distress.” Under this act, an affidavit by the landlord “that he has just cause to
suspect and doth believe,” that such was the tenant’s intent, is not sufficient.
III. PRocEEDINGS ON A DISTRESS FOR RENT.
The act of 1772 authorizes the lessor to distrain after the determination of the
lease, provided he retain the title® But the sequestrator of a life-estate cannot
1 Purd. 1160, The exemption may be waived. 11 Dall. 440. 7 Phila, 247.
6 W. 34. 2 Pars. 282. 12 3W. & S. 531.
2 35 Penn. St. 369. 13 Purd. 1161. 3 W.246. 7 Exch. 618, 630. 5
3 Purd. 834, M. & S. 200.
4 Ibid. See 3 Luz. L. Reg. 99. 14 138. & R, 417.
5 3 W, 246. 15 3 W, 246.
51W.& §, 416. 16 7 Exch, 618.
7 35 Penn. St. 162, And see 13 Wend. 479. 17 Purd. 1161. This provision is extended to
33 Cr. 0. C. 411. the cities of Pittsburgh and Allegheny, by act 29
® Purd. 1160. March 1870. Pamph. 669.
0 128. & R. 217. 3 W. &S. 533. 44 Penn. St. 38 1 Ash. 120.
477. 1 Ash. 121, 187. 19 Purd. 1159.
-
340 DISTRESS FOR RENT.
distrain after the death of the tenant for life If a lessee for years sub-let for
a part only of his term, he may distrain for rent in arrear; otherwise, if he
assion his whole term, reserving a rent.2 Where tenants in common make a
joint lease, they may join in a distress for rent.? But joint-owners of chattels
distrained for rent due on a joint lease, are not entitled to the benefit of the exemp-
tion law. #
The distress may be made by the landlord himself, or he may empower any
individual to make it, as his bailiff; a parol authority is sufficient.’ But if the
avarrant be in writing, the law requires no set form of words ;® it is sufficient, if
the landlord and tenant be named, and power given to distrain for the rent.'' A
constable is not bound to make a distress for rent; the law only requires his inter-
terence, after the distress has been made, should an appraisement and sale become
necessary. But whenever he does act, he acts officially, and renders his sureties
liable® Taking a note, or obtaining a judgment for the rent, does not impair the
right to distrain.
A distress must be made in the day-time ;" a landlord caunot justify making a
distress for rent, after dark.? A distress for rent, before sunrise or after sunset, is
illegal, although there may be daylight.* Executing a distress-warrant in the
night is a trespass, for which the party authorizing it is responsible.“ A distress
cannot legally be made on Sunday.* A landlord is not justified in breaking open an
outer door, in order to distrain ; not even the outer door of a stable.” But he
may open the outer door of a stable, in the ordinary way in which other persons
‘using the building are accustomed to open it. An entry through an open window
is lawful.’® But not, if it is fastened by means of a hasp;” or even if it be shut,
but not fastened.2 A distrainor, however, may lawfully climb over a fence, and so
gain access to the house by an open door.” If the party, having lawfully entered,
be forcibly turned out of possession, he is justified in breaking open an outer door,
in order to regain the possession.”
The whole rent ought to be distrained for at once, and not a part at one time, and
a part at another; but if the distress made for the whole turn out to be insufficient,
either from the circumstance of not finding a sufficient distress on the premises, or
mistake in the value of the property seized, a second distress may be made to supply
the deficiency. As a general rule, to render a distress complete, there must be a
seizure of the property distrained upon; but this need not be an actual seizure of
the particular goods; it is sufficient, if the landlord give notice of his claims for
rent and declares the goods which he names shall not be removed from the premises
until the rent is paid.” And if the landlord come into a house and seize upon
some goods as a distress, in the name of all the goods in the house, that will be a
good seizure of all.* The distress must be made upon the demised premises; it
cannot be made upon the highway, or on the common street.”
The distress having been made, the act of 1772 requires, that notice of the taking,
with the cause of the distress, be left, at the time of making it, at the mansion-
house, or other most notorious part of the premises charged with the rent.% This
notice must be in writing,” and should embrace a schedule of the articles levied on,
as well as the amount of rent in arrear.*® The inventory should be sufficiently full
to inform the tenant of the goods distrained, for which he may issue a replevin;
but the landlord is not required to weigh and measure all the goods in a store
1 23 Pitts. L, J. 182, 17 16 Q. B. 254,
25 W. 134. 16 Johns. 159. 18 7 Exch. 72.
8 3W.&S. 531. 19 5 H. & N. 647.
4 44 Penn. St. 442. 20 14 0. B. (N. S.) 634.
54W.98. 3 W. 4&8. 531. 2121. R., Q. B. 590.
63W.&S, 531. 22°15 C. B. (N.S.) 458.
74 W. 98, 23°11 M. & W. 465
8 17 Penn. St. 169, Lewis, J. 24 3 Bl. Com. 11.
9 2 Clark 393. 26 105 Penn. St. 187.
10 3 P. & W. 487. 10 Md. 333. 38 6 Mod. 215,
11 16 Q. B. 254. 7 Stat. 52 Hen. 3,¢.15. Rob. Dig. 171. And
260. & P. 212. see 5 Hill 481. Anth. N. P. 339, '
12H. & N. 647. 28 Purd. 1161-2.
14 16 Tl. 283. 29 8 Q. B. 1034.
1 | Bro. 243. 80 6 Exch. 234,
16 Thid.
DISTRESS FOR RENT. 341
which he has distrained upon.) The omission to give this notice does not render
the distress itself unlawful ; it is only necessary to warrant a sale of the gouds dis-
trained.? It may be given to the tenant in possession, or to the owner of the
goods distrained.*
It is the duty of the tenant, immediately after a distress has been made upon his
goods, to give notice of his intention to claim the benefit of the exemption law.
For the exemption of certain goods from distress for rent is a privilege that may be
waived by the tenant, either by the terms of his contract, or by an omission to claim
the exemption at a proper time.* It is too late, after the property is put up for
sale The object of the legislature was, to prevent a sale of the property; and
every act or omission of the debtor that amounts to an acquiescence in, or an affirm-
ance of the sale, is in direct contravention of that object.6 A sub-tenant, or
assignee of the tenant, who has not been recognised as such by the landlord, can-
not claim the benefit of the exemption law, as against a distress for rent; the goods
being levied on as those of the original lessee, by whom no claim for the exemp-
tion is made ;’ and joint-owners of chattels distrained for rent due upon a joint
demise, are not entitled to the benefit of the exemption law.’ If the tenant claim
the benetit of the exemption law, it becomes the duty of the constable or officer
charged with the execution of the warrant, to summon three disinterested and
competent persons, who are to be sworn or affirmed to appraise the articles
which the debtor may elect to retain under the exemption law; and the property
thus chosen and appraised is thereby exempted from levy and sale® The sheriff
or constable may administer the oath or affirmation to the appraisers.
The act of 1772 allows the tenant five days, after distress made, in which to re-
plevy the goods ;" and during that period, the landlord may impound the goods |
upon the premises;"? and he does not become a trespasser for continuing them so
impounded for a reasonable time, after the expiration of the five days; seven days
is not an unreasonable time, as he cannot sell without six days’ notice, or seven, if
the last day falls on Sunday.* In computing the time, the day of making the dis-
tress is to be excluded.“ At the expiration of that period the party distraining is
required to call on the sheriff or constable (if not already done), who are required
by the act of 1772 to be aiding and assisting therein, and to cause the goods to be
appraised by two reputable freeholders; who are to be first sworn or affirmed by
the sheriff or constable.® If the appraisement be made before the expiration of
the five days, and the distrainor proceed to a sale, he becomes a trespasser ab initio."
But a premature appraisement, after a lawful distress, will not have that effect, if
there be no sale.” No person but the owner of the goods distrained can waive the
appraisement and notice of sale; it cannot be done by a bailee of the goods levied
on.® The tenant’s waiver of an appraisement, however, is valid as against his cred-
itors.® The distress having been duly appraised, the act of 1772 requires the
sheriff or constable, after six days’ public notice, to sell the goods and chattels so
distrained for the best price that can be gotten tor the same, for and towards the
satisfaction of the rent and the costs of the distress ; leaving the overplus, if any,
in the hands of the sheriff, or constable or owner’s use.”
The goods must be sold separately or in parcels; a lumping sale is illegal. They
may be sold in such lots as shall be best calculated to bring the highest price.” A
party who claims goods under a constable’s sale upon a distress for rent, must prove
affirmatively that all the statutory requirements of such a sale have been complied
with. The presumption that an officer of the law has done his duty and taken all
the preliminary steps that are necessary to an official act must be limited to his acts
as an officer; it has no application to a constable who distrains and sells goods
4 100 Penn. St. 389. Il Purd. 1161-2.
26 W. 40, 12 2 Dall. 68.
3 8w.&S. 303. 13 7 Phila, 195. See 6 W. 37.
46W.36. 23 Penn. St. 93. 36Ibid. 380. 2 14 6 W.37. 60 Penn. St. 452,
Gr, 197. % Purd. 1162.
5 19 Penn. St. 255. 25 Ibid. 182. 16 60 Penn. St. 452.
6 21 Ibid, 247. 17 3 Penny. 406. 9 W. N.C, 438,
T 34 Ibid. 36. 18 30 Penn. St, 287.
8 44 Ibid, 442, 19 4 Phila. 299.
9 Purd. 1160. 20 Purd. 1162. See 6 Whart. 460-4,
10 Thid. 834. 21100 Penn, St. 400.
342 DISTRESS FOR RENT.
under a landiord’s warrant ; in such cases, he is the agent of the landlord, and not
an officer of the law?
The act of 1772, moreover, gives to the landlord a special action on the case,
with treble damages, for any pound-breach or rescous of goods distrained for
rent; either against the actual offender, or against the owner of the goods, in case
the same be afterwards found in his possession.? And in case of pound-breach, the
distrainor may also follow the goods and retake them.’ :
As the tenant may have a set-off against the landlord’s claim for rent, the act
of 20th March 1810, § 20, gives to justices of the peace jurisdiction in all cases of
rent, not exceeding one hundred dollars, so far as to compel the landlord to defalcate
or set off, the just account of the tenant out of the same; but the landlord may
waive further proceedings before the justice, and pursue the method of distress in
the usual manner, for the balance so settled. And if any landlord shall be con-
victed, after such waiver, of distraining for and selling more than to the amount
of such balance, and of detaining the surplus in his hands, he shall forfeit to the
tenant four times the amount of the sum detained. The act also provides that no
appeal shall lie in the case of rent, but the remedy by replevin shall remain as here-
tofore.t Under this act, it seems, that the justice cannot proceed to judgment and
execution ;> but his decision is prim@ facie evidence, on the issue of no rent in
arrear, in favor of a stranger whose goods were levied on.6 No appeal lies by the
tenant from the justice’s decision ;* but the landlord is not deprived of the right
of appeal by the proviso in the act.§ The tenant may defalk any taxes upon the
demised premises which he has been compelled to pay.®
IV. ILLEGAL DISTRESSES.
A distress may become illegal-in various ways; as by distraining when there is
no rent in arrear ; by being excessive; by distraining for more rent than is due; or
by a disregard of the provisions of the law relating to distress.
The act of 1772 provides, that if a distress shall be made when, in truth, there
is no rent in arrear, the owner of the goods so distrained and sold, his executors or
administrators, may, by action of trespass, or upon the case, to be brought against
the person or persons so distraining, or any or either of them, his or their executors
or administrators, recover double the value of the goods so distrained and sold,
with full costs of suit.’
If no rent be due, the landlord is a trespasser ab initio." The constable who
made the distress can only justify by showing that there was rent in arrear; the
landlord’s warrant is no protection? The double damages can only be recovered
against the person distraining, not against him in whose name the distress was
made ;* nor can the double damages be revovered, unless the plaintiff declare upon
statute.* The act, however, does not preclude the tenant from bringing his action
of trespass guare clausum fregit, at common law, in which he may recover damages
to a greater amount than the value of the goods distrained.
For an excessive distress, the remedy is by action on the case, founded on the
statute of Marleberge, which provides that distresses shall be reasonable and not
too great; and he that taketh great and unreasonable distresses, shall be grievously
amerced for the excess of such distresses.° But the entry and distress being lawful
in part, for the rent actually due, and the whole being only one act, trespass will
not lie; it is not like the case of a subsequent abuse of the distress ; but the proper
remedy is an action on the case, founded on the statute.” Where an excessive
distress is not wanton or wilful, the only damages recoverable are the fair value of
1103 Penn. St. 260. T 1 Bro. 69,
2 Purd. 1162. Where a statute gives double or 8 104 Penn. St. 514,
treble damages, the jury who try the case may 9 Purd. 1162.
assess the double or treble damages; but if they 1 Ibid.
neglect to do so, the court may assess the damages 1 77 Penn. St. 423.
on a writ of inquiry for that purpose. 16 Penn, 23 P, & W.30. 17 Penn. St. 163. 102 Ibid. 1
Bt. 256. Treble damages are three times the 18 77 Penn. St. 423.
amount of single damages. Ibid. 14 93 Ibid. 454. And see 6 Cow. 103.
3 3 Dall. 70. 1% 68. & R. 286. 77 Penn. St, 423.
4 Purd. 1162, 16 2 Inst. 106. Rob. Dig. 170. 3 Bl. Com. 12,
5 4 Y. 237. 176 W. 41. 1 Burr. 590. 2 Str. 851.
DISTRESS FOR RENT. 343
the goods, at the place and time distrained, with the cost of replacing them, and
other actual injury, to which interest may be added? ee
Where more rent is distrained for than is due, the remedy is at common law, and
is not founded on the statute of Marleberge.? But trespass will not lie against a
landlord for distraining, for more than was due, the party must bring a special action
on the case at common law.* In such action, the only question is, how much rent
was due and in arrear.* The plaintiff cannot recover damages for distraining for
more rent than was in arrear, under a count for an excessive distress ; the one
claim is at common law, the other under the statute.®
After making a lawful distress, the landlord may commit an act which is in itself
a trespass, and thereby become a trespasser ab initio;® as, if he sell without an
appraisement,” or if he make a premature appraisement, and proceed to a sale of
the goods distrained.® So, where a sale of the goods has been commenced, and the
tenant tenders the difference between the amount realized and the full amount
of rent claimed, with costs; a refusal of the tender, and continuance of the sale
renders the landlord liable, in trespass, for the value of the goods afterwards sold®
So, if the landlord distrain for more than is due, and do not procure an appraise-
ment of the goods levied on, he is liable in trespass, notwithstanding the pendency
of proceedings on the part of the tenant to defalcate.° But when the goods are
replevied, the landlord does not become a trespasser by reason of an omission to
appraise ; this may be done at any time, six days before a sale.™
V. FoRM OF WARRANT TO DISTRAIN.
To G. H.
Wuereas, C. D. is now indebted to me in the sum of ten dollars twenty-five cents for
rent due on the first day of June, a. p. 1880, these are to authorize and empower you to
‘distrain the goods and chattels of the said C. D., which you shall find on the premises
now or lately occupied by him, being a house situate No. 8 Strawberry street, in the
city of Philadelphia, and the same retain in your possession until they can be law-
fully appraised, and after due notice, “sell the said goods and chattels so distrained
for the best price that can be gotten for the same, for and towards satisfaction for the
rent for which the said goods and chattels are distrained, and of the charges of such dis-
tress, appraisement and sale,” returning the overplus, if any, to the said tenant. And
for your so doing, this shall be your sufficient warrant.
Wirnzss my hand and seal, this tenth day of June, a. pv. 1880. A.B. [gzan.]
VI. SUMMONS TO LANDLORD TO DEFALCATE.
COUNTY OF BERKS, ss.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To the Constable of C—— township, in the county of Berks, or to the next constable
of the said county most convenient to A. B., greeting:
WE commanp you that you summon A. B., of the township of C——, in the said county,
to appear before J. R., Esquire, one of our justices of the peace in and for the said
county, on the [fifteenth] day of [August], in the year of our Lord one thousand eight
hundred and [eighty], at [eleven] o’clock in the [forenoon] of that day, to show cause, if
any he has, why the just account of K. F., his tenant, whose goods have been distrained
by him, the said A. B., for a sum not exceeding one hundred dollars, should not be defal-
cated or set off out of the said rent. Witness the said J. R., Esquire, at C township
aforesaid, the [tenth] day of [August], one'thousand eight hundred and eighty.
J. R., Justice of the Peace. [szat.]
VII. Proviso IN A LEASE WAIVING THE BENEFIT OF THE EXEMPTION LAW.
And the said C. D., for himself, his executors and administrators, doth hereby covenant
and agree, that all personal property on the said premises shall be liable to distress, and
also all personal property, if removed therefrom, shall, for thirty days after such removal,
be liable to distress, and may be distrained and sold for rent in arrear; the said C. D.,
for himself, his executors and administrators, hereby waiving all right to the benefit of
any laws made or hereafter to be made, exempting personal property from levy and sale
for arrears of rent.
1 102 Penn. St. 307. 7148. & BR. 399.
2 3 Bl. Com. 12 n. 8 60 Penn. St. 452.
8 6 W. 34. 100 Penn. St. 397. 9 100 Ibid. 389.
4101 Penn. St. 223. 0 27 Pitts. L. J. 17.
5 Ibid. 1 gW.N. C. 438.
aianan TL:A 900
[ 344 ]
Mistrict-Attorneys.
Aor 31 Marca 1860. Purd. 680-1.
Sror, 17. If any district-attorney shall, wilfully and corruptly, demand, take or
receive any other fee or reward than such as is prescribed by law, for any official
’ duties required by law to be executed by him in any criminal proceeding; or if
such district-attorney shall be guilty of wilful and gross negligence in the execu-
tion of the duties of his office, he shall be guilty of a misdemeanor in office, and
on conviction thereof, be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding one thousand
dollars, and to undergo an imprisonment not exceeding one year, and his said office
shall be declared vacant. Upon complaint in writing, verified by the oath or affirma-
tion of the party aggrieved, made to the court in which any district-attorney shall
prosecute the pleas of the commonwealth, charging such district-attorney with wilful
and gross negligence in the execution of the duties of his office, the said court
shall cause notice of such complaint to be given to the said district-attorney, and
of the time fixed by the said court for the hearing of the same. If, upon such
hearing, the court shall be of opinion that there is probable cause for the said
complaint, they shall bind over or commit the said district-attorney to answer the
same in due course of law. If the court shall be of opinion that there is no pro-
bable cause for such complaint, they shall dismiss the same, with reasonable costs,
to be assessed by the court.
Sxcr. 18. If any district-attorney shall be charged, according to law, with any
crime or misdemeanor, before, or bound over or committed by any court, to answer
for wilful and gross negligence in the execution of the duties of his office, it shall
be the duty of the court to appoint some competent attorney thereof, to prepare
an indictment against such district-attorney, and to prosecute the same on behalf
of the commonwealth, until final judgment, to whom a reasonable compensation, to
be fixed by the court, shall be paid for his services, out of the county treasury. If
such district-attorney shall be convicted of any crime, for which he may be sentenced
to imprisonment, by separate or solitary confinement at labor, in addition thereto,
his said office shall be declared vacant by the court passing such sentence.
Act 31 Marca 1860. Purd. 679.
Szcot. 29. No district-attorney shall, in any criminal case whatsoever, enter a
nolle prosequt, either before or after bill found, without the assent of the proper
court in writing first had and obtained.
Aot 12 Marcy 1866. Purd. 680.
Szor. 1. If any district-attorney within this commonwealth shall neglect or refuse
to prosecute, in due form of law, any criminal charge, regularly returned to him,
or to the court of the proper county; or if, at any stage of the proceedings, the
district-attorney of the proper county and the private counsel employed by the
prosecutor should differ as to the manner of conducting the trial, it shall be lawful
for the prosecutor to present his or her petition to the court of the proper county,
setting forth the character of the complaint, and verify the same by affidavit ;
whereupon, if the court shall be of the opinion that it is a proper case for a criminal
proceeding or prosecution, it shall be lawful for it to direct any private counsel
employed by such prosecutor to conduct the entire proceeding, and where an indict-
ment is necessary, to verify the same by his own signature, as fully as the same
eould be done by the district attorney.
The act of 29th March 1819, § 4, provided that, after indictment found by the
grand jury, it should not be lawful for the attorney-general to enter a nolle prosequt
therein, except in the cases of assault and battery, fornication and bastardy, on
agreement between the parties, or in prosecutions for keeping tippling-houses, with
DIVORCE. 345
the consent of the court! The act of 31st March 1860 still further restricts the
powers of the district-attorney, but it does not appear to confer on him the right to
enter a nolle prosequt, even with the consent of the court, in cases in which it was pre-
viously forbidden.”
In a proper case, the district-attorney may send a bill of indictment to the grand
jury, without a previous binding over; but this power should be exercised under the
supervision of the court. He has all the powers formerly vested in the deputy
attorneys-general.*
Diborce,
Divorces are of two kinds, one total, the other partial; the one @ vinculo matri-
lela [from the bond of matrimony]; the other @ mens@ et thoro [from bed and
oard].
The causes of divorce from the bond of matrimony, are: 1. Impotency at the
time of the contract. 2. Knowingly entering into a second marriage. 3. Adultery.
4. Wilful and malicious desertion and absence from the habitation of the other, with-
out a reasonable cause, for and during the space of two years. 5. Cruel and barbarous
treatment, endangering the wife's life. 6. Indignities offered to her person, so as to
render her condition intolerable, and life burdensome, and thereby force her to with-
draw from her house and family. 7. Where the marriage was procured by fraud,
force or coercion, and has not been subsequently confirmed by the injured party. 8.
Where either of the parties has been convicted of felony, and sentenced to an im-
prisonment for a term exceeding two years. 9. Cruel and barbarous treatment by the
wife, rendering the husband’s condition intolerable and life burdensome. 10. Per-
sonal abuse, or such conduct on the part of either husband and wife, as to render the
condition of the other party intolerable and life burdensome.
The acts of 1817 and 1862, also allow a divorce from bed and board, for the 3d, 5th
and 6th causes, and allow the wife such alimony as her husband’s circumstances will
admit of. Al’mony, at common law, is that allowance which is made to a woman for
her support out of her husband’s estate, in case of divorce from bed and board.
Marriages within the prohibited degrees are void, and the courts are authorized to
decree such marriages to be null and void, in the same mode, and after the same pro-
ceedings as for a divorce.
A wife’s absence with her husband’s previous consent, or subsequent approval, is
not a malicious and willful desertion ; but such consent or approval is revocable, and
the parties, by such revocation, are placed in the same position which they occupied
at the time it was given; the party continuing such absence, will then be guilty of
desertion, unless there be reasonable cause to justify it; which must be such as would
itself be a sufficient ground of divorce. The crwelty, within the Pennsylvania statute,
which entitles a wife to a divorce from her husband, is actual personal violence, or
the reasonable apprehension of it; or such a course of treatment as endangers her life
or health, and renders cohabitation unsafe. A wife’s insanity is not a bar to a divorce
for adultery, committed by her when she was insane. The refusal of a foreigner who
arrives and becomes domiciled here, to receive his wife who follows him hither, is a
virtual turning her out of doors, and the court of common pleas may, on her petition,
decree her alimony. The removal and domicil of husband and wife in another state,
is no bar to proceedings for divorce on the part of the wife, for causes occurring in
this state, prior to the removal, if she has returned and resided in this state one year
previous to the filing of the libel.
By act of 26th April 1850, the jurisdiction of the courts is extended to all cases of
divorce for desertion or adultery, notwithstanding the parties were, at the time of the
occurrence of said causes, domiciled in another state.
The act 9th March 1855, (Purd. 684), provided that it shall be lawful for the
several courts of common pleas in this commonwealth, to entertain jurisdiction of all
cases of divorce from the bonds of matrimony Mor the cause of personal abuse, or for
17 Sm. 227. 3 82 Ibid. 405. 11 Phila. 439. 1 Del. 50.
218 P.8. 497. 22 Ibid. 21. 4105 P. &. 484.
346 DIVORCE.
such conduct on the part of either the husband or wife, as to render the condition of
the other party intolerable and life burdensome, notwithstanding the parties were at
the time of the occurring of said causes domiciled in another state : Provided, That
no application for such divorce shall be made unless the applicant therefor shall be a
citizen of this commonwealth, or shall have resided therein for the term of one year,
as provided for by the existing laws of this commonwealth. : :
And the act 22d April 1858 (Purd. 685), enacted that the jurisdiction conferred in
and by the said act to which this is a supplement, is hereby extended to all cases of
divorce from the bonds of matrimony, for the causes therein mentioned, where either
of the parties were, or may be, at the time of the occurring of said cause, domi-
ciled in another state or country: Provided, That no application for such divorce
shall be made, unless the applicant therefor shall be a citizen of this commonwealth,
or shall have resided therein for the term of one year, as provided by the existing
laws of this commonwealth.
The act 26th April 1850, 26, supra, made it lawful to grant a divorce for desertion
or adultery, though the parties were at the time of the cause domiciled in another
state. The supreme court decided in 1858 ‘that that act applied only to persons dimi-
ciled in some other of the United States. This act of 22d April 1858, was evidently
intended to extend the jurisdiction in all cases, but the draughtsman failed in his
attempt, as he bunglingly entitled the act as a supplement to the act of 9th March
1855, supra, which only refers to divorces for personal abuse and indignities. The
courts have no jurisdiction to grant a divorce for desertion or adultery where the par-
ties were, at the time of the occurring of the cause, domiciled in a foreign country.?
The act 20th June 1893,° confers jurisdiction to grant divorces for adultery, deser-
tion or cruel treatment where the wife, having been a citizen, intermarries with a
foreigner and is compelled to abandon her foreign domicile.
* ForM OF LIBEL IN DIVORCE.
In the court of common pleas No. — for the county of Philadelphia. Of December
Term 1894, No. —.
Between Mary Smith, lidellant, and John Smith, respondent.
To the honorable judges of the said court. The libellant complains and says:
1. That the libellant and respondent were lawfully joined in marriage on the first day of
January 1890 at Philadelphia in the state of Pennsylvania and from and after that time
they lived together and cohabited in the relation of husband and wife.
2. That at the time said marriage was contracted the libellant was a citizen of the state of
Pennsylvania and resided at Philadelphia in the said state; and the respondent was a citi-
zen ‘of the state of New Jersey and resided at Camden in said state; that immediately after
their said marriage, the said libellant and respondent resided together at Philadelphia in
the state of Pennsylvania and have since resided in the said city from that time to the date
of the grievances hereinafter set forth and said libellant still resides and has continued to
reside in said city and state. That the present residence of the libellant is at No. 160
South 9th street, in the city of Philadelphia, in the state of Pennsylvania, and that she has
been a citizen of the state of Pennsylvania and has resided therein for the period of one
whole year previous to the filing of this libel; and that the present residence of the re-
sronen is 1096 Locust street in the city of Philadelphia aforesaid (or, is unknown to
ibellant). :
8. And the libellant avers that in violation of his marriage vow and of the laws of this
commonwealth the said John Smith, the respondent, (on or about the first day of June 1890
wilfully and maliciously deserted this libellant, and hath since wilfully and maliciously de-
oe ae absented himself from the habitation of this libellant without any just or reason-
able cause).
Or, (hath by cruel and barbarous treatment endangered your libellant’s life and offered
such indignities to her person as to render her condition intolerable and life burdensome and
thereby forced her to withdraw from his house and family).
Or, (hath given himself ae adulterous practices and been guilty of adultery with divers
women in this commonwealth).
Or, (on the first day of January 1891 knowingly entered into a second marriage whilst the
marriage with this libellant was subsisting, the said second marriage having been entered
into on that date with one Jane Thompson at Camden in the state of New Jersey).
Or, (was on the first day of January 1891 convicted in the court of quarter sessions for
the county of Philadelphia of the crime of forgery and upon said conviction was sentenced
by the said court to an imprisonment for three years).
4. Wherefore the libellant prays thab«a subpena may issue directed to the said John
Smith, the respondent, commanding him to appear before your honorable court on Monday
130 P. S. 412. 230 W. N. C. 132, 8 Purd, 685.
THE DOCKET. 347
December 3d 1894 to answer this libel and complaint; and also that a decree may be made
by your honorable court divorcing her, the said libellant, from the bonds of matrimony be-
tween her and the said respondent. Mary Smits.
State of Pennsylvania,
County of Philadelphia, } oy
The above-named Mary Smith, being sworn according to law, says: That the statements
contained in the above libel are true to the best of her knowledge, information and belief;
and that the said complaint is not made out of levity or by collusion between her and the
said respondent for the mere purpose of being freed and separated from each other, but in
sincerity and truth for the causes mentioned in the said libel.
Sworn and subscribed before me this 1st day of November A. D. 1894.
Mary Situ.
E. A. DEVLIN, Magistrate, Court No. 8.
Che Docket.
I, The manner in which the justice should make IJ. Judicial authorities in relation to docket-
his entries and keep his civil docket. entries.
I. Noruine is of more importance, nothing more entirely essential, to the
prompt and correct discharge of the duties of a magistrate, than a regular, well-
kept docket. The justice should recollect, that when he begins a docket entry he
cannot tell how important may be the principles involved, or the consequences
which may result from the cause, whether civil or criminal, which he is about to
make a matter of record. There is no cause which he enters upon his docket,
however trivial, which may not be carried before a court, and his conduct undergo
a public, judicial revision, either by certiorart or appeal. These considerations
will, undoubtedly, induce a desire, that all his entries and his return, shall be of
such a character, that they will bear the severest scrutiny, the closest examination.
Make your docket-entries, on the instant that you transact the business which
you record, and be especially attentive, on all occasions, to enter the date of the
transaction. Do no act; issue no process; let nothing be done, in relation to a
suit, without instantly making it, and the time it is done, a matter of record. Thus
will you, at all times, with entire confidence, be able to refer to your docket as a
faithful record of all that has been done in the suit of which it purports to be an
authentic register.
Be accurate in every entry; so accurate as to be at all times ready to be legally
qualified as to the truth of every part of it. When you note that A. was affirmed,
or B. was sworn, do not fail to note whether they were witnesses called by the
plaintiff, or the defendant: thus John Scott, sw. p., Job Ox, aff.d. This detail
to a magistrate, who has not had experience, may seem of little, or no, value; but
nothing can be unimportant which goes to stamp the character of fidelity and
minute accuracy upon the magistrate’s docket. Let it exhibit a full and faithful
record of all that has been done, from the issuing of the first process to the termi-
nation of the suit.
When called upon to issue a subpana, note its issue and the date, and whether
for plaintiff or defendant, and the number of witnesses whose attendance is required.
The value of such minute details will be more and more estimated the longer the
magistrate continues in the commission, because his opportunities of appreciating
their value will increase in proportion to the amount of business he may be called
upon to transact.
The entries on the civil docket should exhibit the following particulars :—
1. The names of the parties, and the right or capacity, in which they sue, but
the law considers them as almost equal to records; they fall within the rule of
public books, which may be proved by sworn copies.®
A sworn copy of the entries of a justice of the peace is admissible in evidence,
with the same effect as the docket itself.? In certain cases, however, where an
inspection of the original docket is necessary to the due administration of justice,
the justice may be compelled to produce it in court, by a subpena with a clause of
duces tecum ; for instance, where there is any question as to the genuineness of the
alleged docket-entry ; where a subsequent fraudulent alteration of the original entry
is alleged, &c.
As justices of peace have not jurisdiction in all cases of contract, it ought to
appear, from their docket entry, what is the nature of the contract upon which
the action is founded. If it do not appear from the record that the justice had
jurisdiction, the judgment, on certiorart, will be reversed.®
A justice of peace is not bound to set out the evidence at large on his docket,
but he must state the demand of the plaintiff, and the kind of evidence produced to
support it, and in case of an appeal, he must return the whole proceedings.® The
record is the only evidence of the cause of action.”
Where a suit before a justice is terminated by any act or agreement of the par-
ties, which amounts, directly or indirectly, to a discontinuance of the action, it is a
part of the official duty of the justice to enter such act or agreement upon his
docket; and the docket-entry is evidence of the same.”
If by the transcript of a magistrate’s judgment, filed in the court of common
pleas, it appears that execution was issued and returned, “ No goods and defendant
not found,” it is sufficient to warrant a fiert facias [a writ to levy] without filing a
certificate.¥
1 Lambard’s Hirenarcha, 63, 66. 8 1 Bro. 339. 11 Phila. 348.
2 4 Inst. 170. 95 Binn. 31. 1 Bro. 207. 29 Leg. Int. 92.
3 2Ww.& S. 377. 1 Luz. L. Reg. 131. 2 Ibid. 191.
* 6 Ibid. 50. 10 8 Phila. 636. And see 3 Leg. Gaz. 260. 1
5 7 W. 189, 192. Luz. L. Reg. 89.
6148.&R.440 4W.&8.192,-10 Penn. St. 1 21 Penn. St. 66,
161. 14 Ibid. 413. 32 Ibid. 539. 1 Phila. 25. 26 W. & S. 343,
7148. & R, 440
L 350 J
Docket-Entries and frees.
TuHE following docket-entries, civil and criminal, and the marginal fee-bills, noting
the fee allowed by the act 2d April 1868, for every service performed by the justice
and the constable, have been diligently and repeatedly revised by the writer of this
note, and every entry and item of costs has been carefully verified. They are, there-
fore, with confidence, recommended to the magistracy of the state as being, in all
particulars, in accordance with the laws. The anxiety for accuracy in the entries
and the items of cost has been the greater from the difficulties heretofore expe-
rienced, and from not having been able to find entries and bills of costs upon which
any reasonable reliance could be placed as to their accuracy. .
Care has been taken not only to select docket-entries, embracing a great variety
of subjects, but also to introduce into the proceedings those incidents which most
frequently present themselves in the discharge of this department of the duties of
a justice of the peace.
ABBREVIATIONS USED IN THE DOCKET-ENTRIES, &c.
Pig. Plaintiff; Deft. Defendant ; w. witness; sw. sworn; aff. affirmed ; subp.
subpena; ¢. constable; atty. attorney; agt. agent; int. interest ; ex iss'd. execu-
tion issued ; ew ret. execution returnable; m. miles; adjd. adjourned.
REFERENCES TO THE DOCKET-ENTRIES,
I. to IIT. Goods sold and delivered. XVI. For work and labor, and services.
IV. A case in trover and conversion. XVII. A case before referees,
V. Of trespass for damages, &c. XVIII. Horse and gig hire.
VI. Penalty for taking illegal fees. XIX. On an assignment.
VII. VIIL. TX. For work and labor done. XX. A case of nonsuit.
X. Landlord and tenant’s case. XXI. Against bail.
XI. Goods sold and delivered. XXII. On a promissory: note.
XII. On a promissory note. XXITI. Money paid and laid out.
KIIL. Goods sold and delivered. XXIV. For rent.
XIV. Claim of a penalty for issuing a small note. XXV. XXVI. Amicable actions.
XV. Tenant.against landlord. XXVII.
JEREMIAH FINNY
vs.
Horatio Birney.
I. Cryin sure.
Walker, constable.
“served, on oath, by producing the original summons to de-
fendant, and informing him of the contents thereof, October
Proceedings on a rule to show cause, &c.
Summons issued 7th October 18938. J.
Returnable 12th, at 9 to 10 o’clock, a. w.3
costs. the 8th.” And now, October 12th, parties appear; plaintiff
uation, os | Claims $20 for goods sold and delivered to defendant. Demand
Simmons 7 «6S 33($20. Defendant admits plaintiff’s claim; and judgment by
Tet ntonfesea: 2: 50 | confession, for twenty dollars, and costs.
Baccution cution °° 1 G3 |. Same day, defendant pleads freehold for stay of execution.
Satisfaction... + . 15| 13th January 1894, execution issued; returnable February 3d.
‘casei Returned January 24th, with plaintiff’s receipt for the debt.
6. . .
Serving summons, 50 | Costs paid into office.
Mileage, 2m, circular .
Serving execution ee 60
Mileage, 2m.circular. .
into office.
1 Where the judgment is for 2 sum not ex-
ceeding $5.33, there is no stay of execution.
Where the judgment is for a sum greater than
$5.33, yet not exceeding $20, the defendant
shall have a stay of execution for three months ;
where the judgment shall be above $20, and not
exceeding $60, there shall be a stay of sia
months ; and where the judgment shall be above
$60, and not exceeding $100, there shall be a
When the return of the constable is debt and costs paid into
office, the justice should enter on his docket “money paid
Received
_| paid over to the plaintiff, his agent or attorney, and the person
80 receiving having signed the receipt on the docket, the pro-
ceedings in that suit are concluded.
satisfaction.” The money being
stay of execution for nine months: Provided,
That the defendant shall putin absolute bail, or
a plea of freehold, which shall be accepted, and
entered on the docket of the justice. The stay
of execution is counted from the day on which
the judgment is entered. Act 24 June 1885.
But this does not apply to judgments for manual
labor.
DOCKET ENTRIES AND FEES.
JosEPH BaRBARA
vs.
BensamMin Bynany.
costs.
Justice.
Entering action. . «25
Summons. « © « « 25
Ret. and oath ee ee)
Trial and judgment . . » 50
Bail oe ee 8 ew BH
Execution . . +» + . 30
Return . . . . » 2. 15
Constable.
Serving sums. . 50
Mileage, 2 m. circular + 20
Serving execution « 50
Mileage, 2 m. circular » 20
$3.35
WE L.Ic OVENSHINE
vs.
Witiiam ANCHORSMITH.
cosTs.
Justice,
Entering action . . . 0
Summons ts e é i « 25
RBeturnandcoath . . + 25
One oath . : . ~~ «+ 10
Trialand judgment . ~ «+ 50
Revogalsenee: yin a 3
Receiving and paying over . .
Satisfaction . 6: 5 ee 15
Constable.
Servingsummons. . . + 50
Mileage, 2m.circular. . ~. 20
Wi.i1am DRINKHOUSE
vs.
Mary CoLpwater.
costs,
Justice.
Enteringaction . . «+25
Summo. «ee ew
Return and constable’s oath » 2%
Continuance. . . - « 20
Subpoena, two witnesses . . 35
Subpoena, three w. . » . 45
Four oaths . - » 40
Trialandjudgment . . . 50
Appeal, &c. . * - = 21.00
Oath, &., of bail. =. » % 10
Constable.
Serving summons, bycopy. =. 50
Mileage, 2 m, circular . » + 20
Serving two subps. personally . 1.00
Mileage,6 m circular. . . 60
—_
$6.05
801
II. Crvizn surr. Summons issued 2d October 1893. J. Walker,
constable. Returnable the 7th, at 4 to 5 o’clock, p.m. ‘ Served,
on oath, by producing the original summons to defendant, and
informing him of the contents thereof, October 3.’ October
7th, parties appear; plaintiff claims $20 for goods sold and
delivered. Defendant admits that he owes plaintiff $10 ; but
denies the balance. Plaintiff produces his book of original
entries, and is sworn thereto: whereupon judgment, publicly,
for the plaintiff, for twenty dollars, and costs. Defendant
enters bail for stay of execution. I am held in $45 as absolute
bail for stay of execution.
Signed, J. Ray, No. 500, So. 6th St,
Execution issued 8th January 1894; returnable January
28th. Returned by the constable, indorsed “ No goods.”
III. Civin surr. August 8th 1893, summons issued. G.
Wallace, c. Returnable August 13th, at 10 to ll a.m. Served,
by copy, at the dwelling of defendant, &c., on oath. Parties
appear. Debt, balance of an account for goods sold and de-
livered. Demand, $19.44. T. H. (sw.) plif. Defendant claims
to set off a pair of shoes sold to plaintiff, charged in his book
at $1.75. Plff. produces deft.’s receipt for the above shoes for
$1.75. Judgment for the plaintiff for nineteen dollars and
forty-four cents.
August 30th, I become absolute bail in this case, in the sum
of forty dollars, for stay of execution.
Signed, A. Brut, No. 967, Arch St.
Money paid into office, December 12th.
Received satisfaction.
Signed, W. OvENsHINE.
IV. Trover anp conversion. Summons issued 7th October
1893. G. Wallace, constable. Returnable 12th October, 9 to
10 o’clock, a. m. Returned, on oath. “ Served, October 8th, by
leaving a copy at defendant’s dwelling-house, in the presence
of one of her family.” Parties appear. Plaintiff claims $20
damages in trover and conversion, for a gun belonging to the
plaintiff, which he loaned to defendant, and which defendant
has not returned, although requested. Demand, $20. Defend-
ant asks a continuance, to which plaintiff does not object.
Adjourned to the 14th inst., 9 a.m. Subpoena for two wit-
nesses given for plaintiff. Subpoena for three witnesses for
defendant: And now, October 14th, parties appear, E. F. Oy)
plaintiff, G. H. (sw ) plaintiff, J. R. (aff.) and G. M. (sw.) for
defendant. Having heard the parties, their proofs and allega-
tions, judgment, publicly, for the plaintiff for $15 and costs.
Defendant appeals. I am held as absolute bail in this case in
$35, conditioned for the payment of all costs accrued, or that
may be legally recovered against the appellant.
Signed, B. Cooxz, No. 34, So. 13th St.
Bail justified on oath. Same day, gave a transcript to de-
fendant.
852 DOCKET FEES AND ENTRIES.
Heyry Dunpas V. Trespass in pamaces. Warrant issued 7th October 1893.
vs. J. Walker, constable, Same day defendant brought up. Plain
WiuiraM Prrv. tiff appears and claims $35 damages in trespass for injury done
or committed by defendant, on the 2d inst., on his ee real
estate. Defendant says he is not guilty. E. H. (sw.) for plain-
tiff. On hearing the proofs and allegations of the parties,
3 judgment, publicly, for the plaintiff for thirty-five dollars, and
Pa ena suaaRaBe to | costs. Defendant claims stay of execution. ;
Ball cn. t,t} Tam held in $75 in this case as absolute bail for stay of
ma: . ! 15 | execution, 7th October 1893.
C. J. Fox, No. 340, So. 4th St.
Return of execution 6
A Signed,
Al.ex. and return and satis”
1894, 8th April, execution issued; returnable 28th April.
cosTs.
Justice.
Watering actio: . ah Hi: ee ARS
Oapias . . . .
faction. .
Constable.
reson capa: =< 24) | Execution returned indorsed by the constable ‘ No goods, and
soeing exeoutfon : tt 89 | the defendant removed from the city. J. Walker, constable.
Serving al. ex. and mileage’ < 90 | April 28th.’” The bail appears, May 10th, and pays the debt,
$5.85 | 1Dterest and costs ; and the plaintiff assigns to him the debt, in-
terest and costs. ‘‘ For a valuable consideration, I assign this
judgment, &e., to C. J. Fox, the bail in this case.”
Signed, Henry Donpas.
October 20th, C. J. Fox desires that an execution may issue
against the defendant. Execution issued and made retarnable
November 9th. Int. $1.09.
ForRM OF THE EXECUTION IN THIS CASE.
CITY OF READING, ss.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To the Constable of the Second Ward, or to the next constable of the said city most
convenient to the defendant, greeting :
Wuenrtzas Henry Dundas to the use of O. J. Fox, the bail of the defendant, on the 7th
day of October 1893, obtained judgment before J. F., one of our aldermen for the said
city, against William Pitt, for the sum of thirty-five dollars, damages in trespass, togethor
with two dollars and ninety-three cents, the costs of suit, which judgment remains un-
satisfied ; therefore we command you that you levy the said damages and costs on the
goods and chattels of the said debtor, and indorse hereon the time at which you make
your levy, and hereon, or on a schedule to be hereto annexed,! a list of the same, and
within twenty days from the date hereof expose the same to sale by public vendue,
you having given due notice thereof, by three or more advertisements, put up at the
most public places in your ward, and returning the overplus, if any, of the said sale, to
the said defendant. awa, for want of sufficient distress, that you take the body of the
said defendant into custody, and him convey to the debtor’s apartment of the said city,
there to be kept by the sheriff or keeper thereof until the damages, interest and costs
aforesaid, shall be fully paid.J]* And of your proceedings herein, together with this
execution, make return to our said alderman on or before the ninth day of November,
in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and eighty. Witness our said
Alderman, at Reading, who hath hereunto set his hand and seal the 20th day of
October, a. p. 1894,
Nov. 5. Money paid into office.
Received satisfaction.
Signed,
J. F., Alderman.
O. J. Fox.
{szau.]
Indorsement on the back
of the Execution,
H. Dounpas, to the use,
Ce
0. JR,
vs.
Winitam Pitt.
bt + $35.00
Interest3 + 1.09
‘oats 4,85
Al. ox 1.60
J, We, oe $41.94 |:
Returnable Nov. 9th, page 178. ~
1 The constable is authorized by law to indorse
his levy either on the back of the execution or on
a piece of paper attached to it; but the time at
which he makes his levy must be indorsed on the
execution itself.
2 When the law does not permit the imprison-
ment of the defendant, the words inclosed in
brackets in the execution should be carefully
expunged by the justice before he puts it into the
hands of a constable.
8 The justice should calculate interest on the
amount of the judgment from the day on which
the judgment was given, until the day on which the
money is paid, or on which he issues his execution.
DOCKET-ENTRIES AND FEES.
F, A, AncHTERNacat
vs.
GaBRIEL JOHNSON,
Sheriff of the county of
Chester.
costs.
Justice.
Entering action 2. Sw 8 25
Summons. .« « « «
Return and oath ofconst. . . 25
Continuance. 8» - « - 20
Onecath .« «© «© « « 10
Appeal, &c. .
Constable.
Serving summons personally . 50
Mileage, 6 m. ciroular . . 60
Justice JUMPUP
v8.
Curistian KINGKILLER.
costs.
Justice.
Enteringaction . . « © 2%
Summons . , 0 2
Return and c. oath * 25
Two subpoenas . . ». « 50
Rule torefer. . + « « 15
Ruleof reference. . « «+ 25
Notice to referees. . «© « 15
Two subpoenas .
Notice to parties . . - . 60
Entering be pai report . 80
eiving and pa: over. . 60
Satisfaction 2 . . > e . 1
Constable.
Servingsummons. . « + 25
Mileage,1 m. circular. . . 10
Serving subp. 2 w. copy 1.00
Mileage, 2m. circular . « « 20
Serving notices on the referees,
personally. . . . «© 1.50
Mileage, 3m. circular. . « 30
Serving subp. 2 w. personally . 1.00
Mileage,2m.circular . . . 20
Serving notices to parties . . 1.00
Mileage,2m.circular. . . 20
$10.10
23
353
VI. For rakinc 1LLecaL Fees. April 24th, 1894, summons
issued. D. Rittenhouse, constable. Returnable, April 30th,
10 to ll a.m. Served on the defendant, on oath, by producing
to him the original summons, and informing him of the contents
thereof. Parties appeared April 30th. Plaintiff claims $50
penalty from the defendant, for that, within six months next
before the commencing of this suit, he, the said defendant, as
sheriff of the eounty of Chester, did, within the said county,
to wit, at West Chester, charge, demand and take from the
plff. other and greater fees than are expressed and limited by
the act of assembly in such cases made and provided, for
service done and rendered by defendant as sheriff aforesaid,
in relation to a suit in the court of common pleas for said
county, in which the said F. A. Aechternacht was plaintiff,
and Paul Murray was defendant, by which taking of unlawful
fees the plaintiff was injured.
The plff. further claims another penalty of $50; for that the
deft. within six months aforesaid, as sheriff aforesaid, within
the county aforesaid, to wit,at West Chester, did charge, de-
mand and take from the plff., other and greater fees than are
expressed and limited by the act of assembly of this common-
wealth in such cases made and provided, for services done
and rendered by defendant, as sheriff aforesaid, in and about
a suit, in the said court of common pleas, in which the said
F. A. Aechternacht was plaintiff and Joanna Mickly; defend-
ant, by which taking of unlawful fees aforesaid, the plaintiff
was injured. Demand, $100. Adjourned to May 6th, 10
a.M. Parties appear. W. W. (sw.) plff. Adjd. to the 11th,
10 a.m. Plaintiff appears. Judgment, publicly, for plaintiff,
for one hundred dollars.
May 13th, defendant appeals. I am held in $50 as bail
absolute in this case, conditioned for the payment of all costs
accrued, or that may be legally recovered against the appellant,
Signed, C. Wecxerzy, New Lond. Towns’p.
VII. Crviu surr. September 19th 1894, summons issued-
J. Walker, c. Returnable September 24th, 3 to 4p. mu. Served,
on oath, on the defendant, by producing to him the original
summons, and informing him of the contents thereof. PIff.
claims for work and labor, and services rendered in selling a
tract of land for defendant. Demand $35. Two subpoenas
for plaintiff. Parties appear, and agree to leave all matters in
variance between them to H. C.,B.S.,and J. W., to meet at 7
o’clock, in the evening of October 4th, at the office of J. R.,
Esq., No. 188, N. Fourth Street. September 26th, delivered
the rule to the plaintiff ; and served notices on the arbitrators.
Two subpeenas for plaintiff. October 17th, received the report
of the arbitrators. Notified the parties to appear. October
19th, 12 m., plaintiff appears. Judgment according to the
award, for twenty-two dollars and eighty-seven cents.
Money paid into office.
Received satisfaction.
Signed, Joun Top, Agent for Plaintiff.
354
1
Stoxes Dickson
vs.
Sixty Maruack.
costs,
Justice.
Entering action » 5 wt 85
Summons... «we 25
Returnandc.oath . . © B
Continuance. . se + 20
Subp. pif. . . » 0 2 B
Subp. deft, 6 names. « « 6
Six oaths . . . . 60
Continuance . . . . . 20
Continuance . 5 . 20
Trialand judgment . . , 60
Ex’n, ret. andsatisn . . ) , 60
Constable.
Servingsummons. . .« «+ 25
Mileage, 3 m. circular . . «+ 80
Serving subpoena eo « « 50
Mileage, 2m.circular . * . 20
Serving execution . » « &0
Mileage,2m.ciroular. . ,. 20
$5.90
Henry Kiker
vs.
JaBEZ RaMSHABT.
CcOsTS.
Justice.
Entering action. o 2 25
Summons. . «Ow 88
Return and o, oath é re 2)
Rule to refer . & . « Jb
Rule of reference. . « + 25
Notice to referees. . + 15
Notice to plaintiff. .« « + 25
Notice todefendant . . . 25
Entering report and judgment . 380
Execution . « «© + « 80
Return . 3 . . . . 15
Satisfaction. . + +» . 15
Constable.
jerving summons. . eo + 25
Mileage, 1 m. circular . e » 10
Serving notice on piff, . .» » 50
Mileage, 3 m, circular , . + 380
Serving notice on deft. « . 50
Mileage, 1 m. circular. e 10
Serving notice on 3 referees . 1.50
Mileage,8 m.circular. . , 80
Serving execution . » . 60
Mileage,1m.ciroular. . , 10
Apam Buppry
Vs.
Duke ELDERBERRY.
cosTs.
Justice.
Entering complaint « 25
Issuing precept . . eo 6 26
Hearing and determining . , 60
Recording proceedings. . , 650
Writ of restitution . * . 60
Constable.
Serving precept . . - . 60
Mileage, 2m.oiroular. . . 20
Executing writ of poss'n 2.00
Mileage,2m.ciroular . . , 20
$4.90
DOCKET-ENTRIES AND FEES.
VIII. Crvin svir, August 17th, 1894, summons issued, D.
Rittenhouse, c. Returnable August 23d, 8 to9 a. u. Served,
on oath, personally, on the deft., by producing to him the
original summons, and informing him of the contents thereof.
Parties appear. Debt, work and labor done, and materials
furnished, $45.05. Deft. claims a set-off for money paid and
laid out to the use of plff., $44. Adjourned to the 27th, 8 a. mu.
Subpoena for plff. Subpoena for five witnesses for deft. Parties
appear. J. W. (sw.) deft. D. K. (sw.) deft. D. R. K. a
deft. J. M, (aff.) deft. L. K. (sw.) plffi R. H. (aff.) plff.
Adjd. to the 30th, 8 a.m. Parties appear. Adjourned to 12m.
Parties appear. Judgment, publicly, for the plaintiff for forty
dollars. Execution issued Sept. 22d. Returnable Oct. 12th.
Money paid into office.
Received satisfaction.
G. Davis, Agent for Plaintiff,
IX. Crvin surr. September 10th 1894, summons issued,
J.Walker,c. Returnable September 16th, 10 to 11 a. u. Served,
by leaving a copy at the dwelling-house of defendant, in the
presence of one of his family, on oath. Parties appear. Debt,
work and labor done, 33 days’ wages, $30 a month, $38.25,
credit, cash $11. Demand $27.25, referred to J. F., T. H. and
M. R., to meet September 19th, 7 a. u., at Hollahan’s tavern.
Chestnut St., No. 201. Notified the arbitrators. December
13th, received the report of the arbitrators. Notified the
parties December 13th, to appear December 16th, 10 a. m., to
show cause why judgment should not be entered according to
the award, &c. Parties appear. Judgment, according to the
award of the arbitrators, for the plaintiff, for seventeen dollars.
Execution issued, December 28th. Returnable January 18th.
Money paid into office.
Received satisfaction.
Signed, Hewry Kiger.
X. Lanpiopp AND TENANT’s CASE, under the Act of 3d April
1830. July 14th, 1894, complainant appears and makes oath that
in August 1879, he demised to defendant a certain tenement, No.
3 Lafayette Court, in the city of Philadelphia,for a term of years,
reserving rent; the rent whereof is in arrear and unpaid ; that
there are not sufficient goods and chattels on the premises to
pay or satisfy the said rent, except such as are by law exempted
from Jevy and sale, and that the said lessee has, after being
duly notified, according to law, neglected or refused to rede-
liver up possession of the said premises. Same day, summons
issued, returnable July 18th, 5 to 6 p.m. G. W. constable.
Served on oath. July 18th, parties appear, and, it appearing
that said complaint isin all particulars just and true, judg-
ment is hereby entered against the said Duke Elderberry, the
lessee, that the premises aforesaid shall be delivered up to
the lessor, the said Adam Buddey, and the rent in arrear is
ascertained to be $56.44, Writ of possession issued Julv
24th. Returnable August 3d. July 28th, constable returns
“possession of the premises given to the plaintiff this day ;
.| costs paid into office.”
July 28th. G. Wauzacz, Constable.
DOCKET-ENTRIES AND FEBS.
Parry PartRIDGE
vs.
Tuavy TELLTALE,
cosTs.
Justice.
Enteringaction . . . + 25
Summons . eo. wt 8
Ret. andc,oath . . + 25
Oneoath . « . 2 + 10
Continuance. . « +» + 20
Subpoena, three witnesses . . 45
Trial and judgment . - +» 50
Execution . .« «© « « 30
Return. 2. ew ele U5
Satisfaction . . soe . 16
Noticeofrule. . .« .« . 25
Continuance . . . . 20
Subpoena, two witnesses. , 35
Continuance . . » . 20
Twooaths . . . * , 20
Sontinuance . ee er So:
Execution . . « + | 39
Return. 2 6 ee 15
Constable,
Servingsummons. . . + 25
Mileage,6m.circular. . «+ 50
Serving subp.3 witnesses . 1.50
Mileage,7m. circular. . . 70
Serving execution . . + 50
Mileage, 6 m. circular . - « 50
Serving al. execution . » » 50
Mileage, 6m: circular . * 50
$9.40
JONATHAN WINEBIBBER
vs.
Tonzy SoBERSIDEs.
costs.
Justice.
Entering action 25
Summons . 25
Return ande. oath . 25
Continuance, . «4 + 20
One cath . » 10
Trialand judgment + + : 50
Bail . . . . oe
“Osthofbal » > SS 210
Execution . . . = . 80
Return . . . . . . 1
Constable.
Serving summons ee +e 25
Mileage, 2m. circular . » + 20
Serving execution . « . 650
Mileage,2m.circular. . . 20
JamMeES GRASPALL,
to the use of Joe Jones,
vs.
THEODORE JEMINGSON.
cOsTS.
Tustice,
Entering action . 2. + 25
jummons ==. . oe ee 2
Return and oath of const. . +» 25
Continuance... . » «+ «© 20
Disontinuance . . + « 15
Constable.
Serving summons . ee B
Mileage, 2m. circolar . * . 20
855
XI, Crvit surr. September 6th, 1894, summons issued.
J. Walker, c. Returnable September 12th, 9 to 10 a. m.
Served on the defendant, on oath, by producing to him the
original summons, and informing him of the contents thereof.
Parties epee Debt, goods sold and delivered. Demand,
$4.79. I. D. (sw.) plff. Adjourned to the 16th, 9 a.m. Sub-
poena for deft., for three witnesses. Plaintiff appears. Judg-
ment, publicly, for the plaintiff for four dollars and seventy-
nine cents: Same day, execution issued. Returnable October
5th. Execution stayed by a rule on the plaintiff to show
cause why the judgment shall not be opened, in consequence
of an error in the subpoena as to the hour of meeting. Ad-
journed to the 26th, 9 a.m. Notified the plaintiff. Parties
appear. September 26th, adjourned to October 6th, 9 a. m.
Subp. for two w. for defendant. Parties appear. Adj’d to
the 10th, 9 a. m. October 8th, issued two attachments for
F. D. and I. H., defaulting witnesses. Parties appear. J. D.
(aff.) and I. H. (sw.) for plff. Adjd. to 3 p. uw. Plaintiff
appears. Rule discharged, and alias execution issued, Octo-
ber 10th. Returnable October 30th.
October 31st, money paid into office.
Received satisfaction.
Signed, No. Noste, Att’y for Plaintiff.
XII. On a Promissory note. June 25th, 1893, summons
issued. G. Wallace, c. Returnable July Ist, 10 to 11 a. m.
Served on deft., on oath, by producing to him the original
summons, and informing him of the contents thereof. Parties
appear. Debt, as indorser of a promissory note made by
S. Brady, dated March 16th, 1893, at 90 days, for $40. Demand
$40. Adjourned. Parties appear. Adj’d to 16th, 4 Pp. m.
Parties appear. F. T. (sw.) plff. Judgment, publicly, for
plff. for forty dollars.
August 6th, I become absolute bail in $85 for stay of exe-
cution. Bail justified on oath.
Signed, Gero. Laws, No. 118 Lawrence St.
August 21st, 1893. For a valuable consideration, I transfer
to F. Toms, all the right, &c., of the plaintiff to this judg-
ment, &c. :
Signed, Jos Jones, Att'y for the plaintiff.
Execution issued January 25th, 1894, returnable Febru-
ary 15. Interest, $1.20. Ret’d “no goods.”
XIII. Crvin suit. May 7th, 1894, sums. issued. D. R.,
const. Ret. May 13th, 10 to 11 a.m. Served, on oath, on
deft., by producing to him the original summons, and inform-
ing him of the contents thereof. Parties appear May 13th.
Debt, goods sold and delivered, $39.31. Interest $7. Demand,
$46.31. Adj’d tothe 15th, 94.m. Parties appear. Deft.
produces an order under seal of the court of common pleas
of Phita. county, dated March 13th, 1880, stating that the
deft. having exhibited to the court the consent in writing of a
majority in number and value of his creditors, the said court
order that he be released from all suits, &c., for any debt con-
tracted, or cause of action created previously, and that he be
discharged for seven years thereafter. Whereupon, the plff.
withdrew his suit, and paid the costs.
356
ForM OF A SUMMONS FOR A PENALTY FOR HAVING ISSUED A SMALL NOTE IN THE
NATURE, &o., OF A BANK-NOTE.
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ss.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To the Constable of the Eighth Ward, or to the next constable of the said city most
convenient to the defendant, greeting :
You are hereby commanded to summon Job Ox, president of the X. Y. and Z. Savings
Institution, to be and appear on the first day of May 1894, between the hours of eight
and nine o'clock in the forenoon, before J. B., one of our magistrates in and for the said
city, to answer John Leo, who sues as well for himself as for the guardians of the poor.
of the city of Philadelphia, for a penalty of five dollars for a violation of an act of
assembly, passed April 12th, 1828, concerning small notes. Witness our said magistrate,
at Philadelphia, who hath hereunto subscribed his name and affixed his seal the 26th
day of April, in the year of our Lord 1894. :
i Nagintcann's office, No. J. B., Magistrate. [szaz.]
Indorsed, “served on the defendant, April 27th, 1894, by producing to him the original
summons, and informing him of the contents thereof.
“ Gzorce Wauuace, Constable, May Ist.”
DOCKET-ENTRIES AND FEES.
Joun Leo, who sues as.
well for himself, as the
guardians of the poor
of the city of Phila-
delphia,
vs.
Jos Ox, president of the
X. Y. and Z. savings
XIV. For a PENALTY FOR ISSUING A SMALL NOTE. April
26th, 1894, summons issued. G. Wallace, c. Returnable May
1st, 8 to9 s.m. Served, on oath, on the deft., by producing
to him the original summons, and informing him of the con-
tents thereof. Parties appear. Subpena for two witnesses
for plff. Plff. complains that the deft. has violated the pro-
visions of the lst and 2d sections of an act of assembly passed
April 12th, 1828, entitled ‘an act concerning small notes and
institution. the payment of money,” by having issued, or caused to be
issued, a note or ticket, purporting to be a note or ticket in
costs, the nature, character and appearance of a bank-note, for a
Tuatice. as | less sum than $5, to wit, for 50 cents, whereby he has incurred
Entering selon - +: 1 35]a penalty of five dollars, which plff. claims. Plff., by his
Return of sumone sndosth - 21 counsel, H. H., Esq., asks that this suit and two other suits,
Ad'ng2oaths =. . . . 20] between the same parties, now pending before the same alder-
Continuance of sult . . ~. 20 ss * :
Trial and judgment . +. | 60| man, for a similar offence, may be consolidated, which request
Execution . + + | + £21) the alderman declines to comply with, as being against the
Return on certiorari
letter and spirit of the act of assembly. T. D. (sw.) plff.
Constable. S. P. (aff.) Adj’d to the 4th, 84.m. Parties appear. he
Serving cummors var? =: | 4p | alderman publicly declares that the deft. is convicted, and
Rerving 2eubp ty ooy + . 1.00 | gives judgment for the plff. for five dollars. Same day, execu-
Serving exeoution 3 50 tion issued ; returnable May 24th. May 26th, received a cer-
Amos Painter
vs.
Aaron PENNYFINDER.
tiorari from the court of common pleas. Same day, superseded
the execution and made a return to the certiorari.
XV. Civin suit. Sci. fa. issued 7th October 1893. D.
Rittenhouse, c. Returnable the 14th, at 9 to 10 o'clock, a. m.,
requiring Aaron Pennyfinder, the landlord, to appear and
show cause why the just account of his tenant, Amos Painter,
costs. should not be set off against his claim for rent. D. R., c. (sw.)
pave tte, s served by leaving a copy at the dwelling-house of the deft., in
fof...» . . . as | the presence of one of his family. And now, I4th, parties
ee’: 6: + 38 | appear, and plaintiff claims to set off his just account of $50
eg near 2x 8 for goods sold and delivered to defendant, against his demand
ae , a es Bs alll > root set-off allowed and rent a
onstabla, judged ; balance due $37.50. Defendant agrees to accept the
Hizags omesicusr’. | 6 anal adjudged to be due, which is paid a office. Received
the sum of $37.50, in full of rent due to the first inst.
Signed, AaRON PENNYFINDER.
DOCKET-ENTRIES AND FEES. 357
JacoB FalrHFUL
vs.
Peter SIMPLE.
costs.
Justice. ge
Rotering action . eo. 25
Summons . . . 2 8S
Returnandc.oath . . + 25
Continuance. . . . + 20
Twoowbs . . . .« + 2
Two continuances a Pe CRO
QOneoath . . . « + 10
Continuance. . « « + 20
Trialandjudgment . . - 50
Bail . . . . . + 25
Travscript . se » « 50
Notice of rule ee ee
Continuance . 20
Appeal, &. Soe ar gL OO
Transcript for p aintiff » . 650
Bxecution . ©. + + « 80
Return . . . . ,
fatisfaction . . . Bo OB
Constable.
Summons served. . « + 25
Mileage,2m.circular. . . 20
Serving execution 7 ~ « 50
Mileage, 2m. circular . a 4 20)
$6.70
Rusu Runny
vs.
Kite KinLinesworta.
costs.
Justice. ss
Enteringaction . «wt 28
Summons . . . , + 2
Returnandoath . . . + 23
Rule torefer. . . 15
Ruleof reference. . . + 29
Notice to referees. . . + 75
Notice to parties . !
Constable.
Executing warrant oe
Mileage, 2m. circular .
CoMMONWEALTH
vs.
TimotHy BanMan.
Mickel Flake, 40 Walnut st., ) each held in $100 that deft.
Geo. Jenny, 2d and Vine sts., J appear at the next court of
quarter sessions, &c.
N. Gorham, Lombard st., held in $50 to prosecute at the next
quarter sessions, &c.
Returned to the December sessions.
VIII. Jan. 12th; 1894. Warrant issued, G. Wallace, c.,
on the oath of William Timid, charging the deft. with having
assaulted and threatened deponent, so that he is afraid defend-
ant will do him harm in body or estate. Jan. 13th, deft.
brought up. W. T. (sw.) Bail required, $100.
Timothy Banman, Upper Paxton township, )} each held in
Joel Standfast, Lower Paxton township, $100 that the
deft. shall appear, &c., at the next court of quarter sessions
for Dauphin county, &c., and in the mean time keep the
Wm. Timid, Harrisburg, held in $50 to téstify, &c,
COSTS.
Justice.
Information, &e.. . © 50
Enteringaction . .« © 25
Warrant . © ee 6 50
One oath . 1. 6 10
Recog. of deft. 3 . . 50
of complainant . . 50
peace, &c.
Constable.
Executing warrant . . 1.00
Mileage, 8 m. ciroular . 80
$4.15
Returned to March sessions.!
1 A committing magistrate in this state has no
authority to bind a person to keep the peace, or
for his good behavior, longer than until the next
term of the court; and the case must then be
heard before the judges of the quarter sessions,
who have the right either to dismiss the complaint,
or order the accused to find bail to keep the peace
and for his good behavior for such period as they
in their discretion shall require. It is the jus-
tice’s duty to make a return of such a case to the
court, unless previously settled by the parties. 2
Pars. 458. Bac. Use ll. Contra, Noy 103.
[ 365 J
Dogs,
I. Proceedings in reference to mad dogs. IV. Judicial decisions,
II. Liabilities of owners of dogs. ~ V. Order to destroy a dog.
III. When dogs the subject of larceny.
I. Act 1 Aprin 1834. Purd. 691.
Seor. 1. If any inhabitant of this commonwealth shall make complaint, under
oath, to any justice of the peace within the county in which he resides, that any
dog owned by acitizen of said county is mad, or has been bitten by, or been fighting
with a dog that is mad, it shall be the duty of the said justice to give notice to
the owner to appear forthwith, for the hearing of the said complaint, upon which
hearing, if the justice shall be satisfied that the said dog is mad, or that he has
been bitten by or been fighting with a mad dog, he shall be authorized to make an
order that the said dog be killed; and if the owner of said dog shall refuse or
neglect to put him to death immediately, or employ some one to kill him, he shall
pay all legal costs accruing in consequence of his refusal or neglect; and in such
case it shall be the duty of the justice to issue an order to any constable of the
county who may be most convenient, directing him forthwith to put the said dog
to death, and who shall execute the same under the penalty of five dollars; and
if no constable can be had conveniently to execute the said order, then he may
direct the order to any other inhabitant of the county whom he may designate,
whose duty it shall be, under the like penalty of five dollars, to execute the said
order.
II. Act 14 Aprin 1851. Purd. 691.
Secr. 7. It shall be lawful for any person or persons to shoot or kill any dog or
dogs found or known to be chasing or worrying sheep, or accustomed so to do, within
this commonwealth, without liability on the part of such person or persons to pay
any damages therefor. ;
Szct. 8. The owner or owners of any dog or dogs shall be liable for all damages
done or caused to be done by any and every such dog or dogs, in an action of tres-
pass vi et armis, in the name of the person or persons injured, to be sued for and
recovered before any court or justice of the peace having jurisdiction of the amount
so claimed.
III WHEN DOGS THE SUBJECT OF LARCENY.
The apts of 6th April 1854, and 18th May 1878, provide for the registry of dogs.
And the act 25th May 1893 provides that all dogs shall be deemed personal pro-
perty, and the subject of larceny.’
IV. An action of trespass will lie before a justice of the peace, against the owner
of a dog, for injury done to the plaintiff, in worrying and killing his sheep.? And
the defendant is liable, not only for the sheep killed by the dog, but for such
injuries as may befall the flock from fright.‘
Under the act of 1851, several owners of dogs are liable, in a joint action, for
damage done in worrying sheep; and no seéenter need be shown as to the habits or
disposition of the dogs.* ‘To justify the killing of the dog, it is not necessary that
he should have been seen tearing the sheep with his teeth; it is sufficient that he
‘has been observed to follow them with a hostile intent.6 The act of 1851 does not
give a magistrate jurisdiction of a case of injury to a child, resulting from the bite
of a dog; it has exclusive reference to dogs accustomed to worry sheep."
3)
1 Purd. 690. 5 63 Ibid. 341. See 17 Wend. 562.
2 Thid. 692. 6 1 Gr. 82.
37 Penn. St. 254. 19 Ibid. 359. 7 2 Phila. 44.
#19 Ibid. 359.
366 DRAINAGE—DRUNKENNESS.
V. ORDER TO DESTROY A DOG.
COUNTY OF BRADFORD, ss.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To the Constable of Y—— township, in the said county, greeting:
Wuerzas, complaint has been made, under oath, before me, one of the justices of the
peace of the said county, that the dog [distinguishing him] owned by A. B. hath been
seen fighting with [or hath been bitten by] a mad dog [as the case may be]; of which
fact due notice hath already been given to the said A. B., requiring him to put the said
dog to death. And whereas the said A. B. hath refused or neglected to comply with the
said order, as by law directed: Therefore, you are hereby commanded to put the said dog
to death, without delay ; hereof fail not, under the penalty of five dollars. Witness my
hand and seal, the 5th day of May 1885. J. R., Justice of the Peace. [sEau.]
Drainage.
Act 30 June 1885. Purd. 1433.
Secr. 1. The boards of health, in cities of the first class, shall be and they are
hereby authorized and directed to adopt and promulgate suitable rules and regula-
tions, for the construction of house drainage and cesspools, and to provide for the
registration of master plumbers and persons engaged in the plumbing business
in said cities: Provided, That no cesspools shall be permitted to drain into a
sewer; And provided further, That nothing in this act shall be construed to apply
to cesspools in existence at the present time, or their connections with, or drainage
into, any sewer.
Sgor. 2. They shall also establish a system of inspection and supervision over all
house drainage and cesspools, and ventilation of the same, and appoint such inspec-
tors as in their judgment may be necessary, at such compensation as may be
approved by the councils of said cities.
Szcr. 3. Any person who shall refuse or neglect to comply with the require-
ments of said rules and regulations when promulgated, shall be guilty of a misde-
meanor, and, on conviction, be sentenced to pay a fine of not more than one hundred
dollars ($100), or undergo an imprisonment not exceeding one year, or both, in the
discretion of the court.
Drunkenness.
I. Penalty for intoxication; and form of con- III. Penalty for public drunkenness.
viction. IV. Judicial decisions.
II. Execution to levy forfeiture.
I. Acr 22 Aprin 1794. ~ Purd. 491.
Szor. 3. If any one shall intoxicate him or herself, by the excessive drinking of
spirituous, vinous or other strong liquors, and shall be convicted thereof, he or she
shall forfeit and pay the sum of sixty-seven cents for every such offence; or if such
person shall refuse or neglect to satisfy the said forfeiture, or goods and chattels
cannot be found, whereof to levy the same by distress, he or she shall be committed
to the house of correction [or the county prison] of the proper county, not exceeding
twenty-four hours.
Szor. 4. Gives jurisdiction to justices of the peace to convict offenders against
the preceding section, either upon their own view, or by process issued to bring the
body of the accused before them,! whereupon they shall proceed in a summary way
to inquire into the truth of the accusation; and upon the testimony of witnesses,
or the confession of the party, shall convict the offender, and pronounce the forfeiture
aforesaid: every such conviction may be in the following terms, viz. :
1 The justice may proceed by warrant or summons. 61 Penn. St. 272.
DRUNKENNESS. 867
BE IT REMEMBERED, that on the [first] day of [May], in the year of our Lord [1880],
A. B., of York county, laborer (or otherwise, as his rank, occupation or calling may
be), is convicted before me, being one of the justices of the peace in and for the county
of York, of being intoxicated by the excessive drinking of spirituous, vinous and other
strong liquors, and I do adjudge him to forfeit for the same the sum of sixty-seven cents,
Given under my hand and seal, the day and year aforesaid.
J.R., Justice of the Peace. [szau.]
Provided always, That every such prosecution shall be commenced within seventy-
two hours after the offence shall be committed.
Seor. 12. One moiety of the forfeiture to be paid to the overseers of the poor,
&c., and the other moiety to the informer: and the inhabitants of any place may,
notwithstanding, be admitted as witnesses.
II. EXEcvurion TO LEVY FORFEITURE.
COUNTY OF YORK, ss.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To any Constable of the said county, and to the keeper of the prison of the county
aforesaid, greeting:
Wuerzas, A. B. hath been this day duly convicted before J. R., Esquire, one of the
justices of the peace in and for the said county, of being intoxicated by the excessive
drinking of spirituous, vinous and other strong liquors; that is to say, on the —— day
of ——, at ——, in the county aforesaid, contrary to the act of general assembly in that
case made and provided, for which offence he hath forfeited the sum of sixty-seven cents,
which fine he hath refused to pay. These are, therefore, to command you, the said con-
stable, to levy the same by distress and sale of the goods and chattels of the said A. B.;
but if sufficient goods and chattels cannot be found whereon to levy the same, together
with costs, that then you take the said A. B., and deliver him to the keeper of the prison
of the county of York, who is hereby commanded to receive and keep the said A. B. in
safe custody for the space of twenty-four hours, or until he shall be legally discharged,
there to be fed agreeable to law. And herein you are neither of you to fail.
Witness our said justice, who hath hereunto set his hand and seal, the —— day of
——, a. p. 1880. J. R., Justice of the Peace. [szat.]
III. Acr 31 Marcu 1856. Purd. 492.
Szor. 29. Any person who shall be found intoxicated in any street, highway.
public-house or public place, shall be fined, upon the view of, or upon proof made
before, any mayor, alderman or justice of the peace, not exceeding five dollars,’ to
be levied, with the proper costs, upon the goods and chattels of the defendant.
IV. Informers under the summary proceedings authorized by the act of 22d
April 1794, and other similar acts, are not liable for costs, if they fail in establishing
their accusations.? The proceeding should be in the name of the commonwealth.’
Where a form of summary conviction is peremptorily prescribed, it must be
exactly followed ; but if such a provision be merely directory, and the conviction
contain everything required by the form given, it will not be vitiated by uaneces-
sarily stating more than is required. The 4th section of the'act of 1794, which
gives the form, declares that ‘every such conviction may be in the following
terms,” and is, therefore, clearly directory. The judgment must ascertain not only
the amount of fine inflicted, but also the alternative duration of imprisonment.®
So odious is drunkenness in the eye of the law, that it has ever been held, that
that artificial madness, which is produced and voluntarily contracted by drunken-
ness and intoxication, and which, depriving men of their reason, puts them in a
temporary phrensy, is an aggravation of the offence, rather than an excuse for any
criminal misbehavior. And Sir Edward Coke says, a drunkard, who is voluntarius
demon, or a voluntary madman, hath no privilege thereby ; but what hurt or ill
soever he doth, his drunkenness doth aggravate it.7 And he shall be punished for
1The act 20 April 1858 2 22, provides that 41 Ash. 411. See 2 Pars. 265.
the penalty shall not exceed two dollars; and 51 Clark 408. 1 Chest. Co. R. 346. The
that it shall be paid over to the treasurer of the commitment should be to the county prison. 15
school district, where the conviction is had. Phila, 418.
Purd. 492, note &. 64 Bl. Com. 25. 2 Dall. 88. 1 Bro. app’x
31 Ash. 413. 17. 2 Brewst. 546.
861 Penn. St. 272. 10 Phila. 479. 71 Inst. 247.
368 DRUNKENNESS.
it, as much as if he had been sober.! The voluntary intoxication of one who, with-
out provocation, commits a homicide, although amounting to phrensy, does not
exempt him from the same construction of his conduct, and the same legal infer-
ences, as affecting the grade of crime, which are applicable to a person perfectly
sober.’
In general, a felonious homicide, committed by one in a state of intoxication, is
deemed murder in the second degree. Where the mind, from intoxication, or any
other cause, is deprived of its power to form a design with deliberation and pre-
meditation, the offence is stripped of the malignant feature required by the statute
to place it in the list of capital crimes.’ Evidence of intoxication is always admis-
sible. Where the crime was committed after provocation, it may be considered, in
determining whether it was done in the heat of passion ; and in other cases, whether
threatening words were used by the culprit with deliberate purpose, or otherwise ;
and generally to explain his conduct.‘
The true criterion as to the capability of the prisoner to commit murder in the
first degree, is, not whether he was drunk or sober, but whether he had the power,
at any time, deliberately to form and plan in his mind the design and intention of
killing his victim. If from intoxication, or other cause the mind is deprived of the
power to plan, deliberate upon, and purpose the death of another, if such act be
the result of impulse, not of deliberation, then the perpetrator is not guilty of murder
in the first degree.> In a case of murder, the prisoner’s intoxication is not such
an excuse as will allow a less than ordinarily adequate provocation to palliate the
offence, unless it were so great as to render him unable to form a wilful, deliberate
and premeditated design to kill, or incapable of judging of his acts and their legiti-
mate consequences.®
Insanity, of which the remote cause is habitual drunkenness, is an excuse for
an act done by the party while so insane, but not at the time under the influence of
liquor. The crime (to be punishable) must take place during a fit of intoxication,
and be the immediate result of it, and not a remote consequence, superinduced by
the antecedent drunkenness of the party. In cases, therefore, of delirium tremens
or mania a potu, the insanity excuses the act, if the party be not intoxicated when
it is committed.”
An agreement executed by a person while in a state of intoxication, and when
he was incapable of transacting business, by reason thereof, will not be enforced
against him or his heir.® A person addicted to intoxication, and being in a state
of inebriety, though not by the procurement of the defendant, was prevailed on
by him to execute a bond for the conveyance of certain lands. Such contract
may be avoided, for this cause, by the legal representatives of the obligor.® The
contracts of an habitual drunkard, made after inquisition found, and before its
confirmation, are void.
The trustee of ‘an habitual drunkard is not liable to an action upon a contract
made by the druukard before inquisition found, although he may have effects in his
hands sufficient for the payment of the claim."
To avoid a contract on the ground of drunkenness, it must be shown affirmatively
to have been so excessive as to render the party incapable of consent, or for the
time, incapacitate him from the exercise of his judgment.” Neither habitual
intoxication nor the actual stimulus of intoxicating liquors, at the time of execut-
ing a will, incapacitates a testator, unless the excitement be such as to disorder
his faculties and prevent his judgment.*
1 1 Hawk. P. C. 3. 82 Harr. & Johns. 421. 1 Bouy. Inst. 227.
218 N.Y. 9. See 69 Penn. St. 204. 3 Brewst. 292. 4 Ibid. 119.
3 Lewis’ Cr. L. 405. 1 Am. L. J. 149. 4 Or. 22 Pitts. L. J. 189.
C. C. 605. See 98 Penn. St. 335. 9 6 W. 139.
418 N.Y. 9. 101 Hon. & Munf. 70. 1 Wash. 164. 3 Cow.
5 3 Phila. 235, 2 Brewst. 546. 445. 1 Pars. 31. 13 Ala. 752. 2 Greenl. Evid.
6 44 Penn. St. 55. 2 Brewst. 546. @ 874. :
7 5 Mason 28. Lewis’ Cr. L. 602. 1Am.L.J. 1 4 W. 459. ks
147, 1 Am. L. Reg. 38. Whart. Cr. L. 332. 2 42 24 Texas 174
Or. 0. 0. 158. 18 N.Y. 9. 138 27 N.Y. 9.
L 369 ]
Duelling.
I. Constitutional provisions. III. Judicial decisions.
UI. Provisions of the Penal Code.
I. ANY person who shall fight a duel, or send a challenge for that purpose, or be
aider or abettor in fighting a duel, shall be deprived of the right of holding any
office of honor or profit in this state, and shall be punished otherwise in such manner
as is or may be prescribed by law.
II. Act 31 Marcu 1860. Purd. 492.
Sect. 25. If any person within this commonwealth shall challenge another by
word or writing” to fight at sword, rapier, pistol or other deadly weapon, or if any
person so challenged shall accept the said challenge ; in either case such person so
giving or sending or accepting any such challenge, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor,
and being convicted thereof, shall be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding five hun-
dred dollars, and to undergo an imprisonment, by separate or solitary confinement at
labor, not exceeding three years.
Scr. 26. If any person shall willingly and knowingly carry and deliver any
written challenge, or shall verbally deliver any message purporting to be a chal-
lenge, or shall consent to be a second in any such intended duel, every such person
so offending shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and being convicted thereof, shall be
sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars, and to undergo an
imprisonment by separate or solitary confinement at labor, not exceeding two years.
Szcr. 27. If any person shall have knowledge of any challenge to fight with any
deadly weapon, given or received, or in any manner be witness to the fact of such
challenge, duel or fighting, not being a second thereat or a party thereto, and shall
conceal the same and do not inform thereof, he or she shall be guilty of a misde-
meanor, and being convicted thereof, shall be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding
fifty dollars, and to undergo an imprisonment not exceeding twelve calendar months.
Scr. 28. If any person shall, in any newspaper or handbill, written or printed,
or otherwise, post, publish or proclaim any other person or persons as a coward or
cowards, or use any other opprobrious and abusive language towards such person for
not accepting a challenge, or fighting a duel, such person or persons so offending,
shall, on conviction, be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars,
and to undergo an imprisonment, by separate or solitary confinement at labor, not
exceeding one year.
III. The offence of duelling consists in the invitation to fight, and the misde-
meanor is complete by the delivery of the challenge.® If a jury believe a letter
inviting to a meeting, though on its face it purports to be a challenge, be merely an
empty boast, and in ridicule to the party to whom it is addressed, they may acquit ;
though it is otherwise, if they deem it in earnest.’
It is a misdemeanor at common law, to challenge another to fight with fists,° or to
challenge another to fight under any circumstances, whether constituting the statu-
tory offence or otherwise.®
Upon the trial of an indictment for carrying a challenge to fight a duel, the
scienter must be proved." ’
The act 21 March 1860 2 23,° provides that it shall be sufficient to frame an indict-
ment for duelling generally against either of the principals or against either of the
seconds.
1 Const. art. XII. 23. See 10 Bush 725. 28 52 Law Rep. 148.
Gratt. 130. 61 Hawks 487. 2 Brevard 243. Whart. Cr.
2 See 2 Wheeler’s Cr. C. 245, L. 3 2674.
31 Const. Rep. 107. 73 Cr. C. C. 178.
46 J. J. Marsh.122, 12 Ala. 276. 2N.& 8 Purd. 493,
Mc(. 181.
24
[ 370 ]
Cabes-Dropping.
BAVES-DROPPERS, or such as listen under walls or windows, or the eaves of. a
house, to hearken after discourse and thereupon to frame slanderous and mischievous
tales, are a common nuisance, and indictable at the sessions, and punishable by fine
and finding sureties for their good behavior." 3
Eaves-dropping is an indictable offence in Pennsylvania; though if it should
appear that the alleged offence was committed by the husband of the prosecutrix,
who was the objeot of it, or by his authority, it would seem that the prosecution does
not lie. There is no law that can prevent a husband constituting a watch upon his
wife. Eaves-dropping consists in privily listening or hearkening of the dis-
course, not in looking or peeping, which is not indictable; but if the defendant
listen as well as look, he may be convicted.2 In Tennessee, a prosecution for eaves-
dropping can be maintained at common law ,
Election Laws.
I. Election of inspectors of the general elec- IX. Closing of polls; counting vote; returns,
tion. X. Ballot-boxes.
II. Election districts. XI. Duties of return-judges.
III. Registry of electors. XII. Township elections,
IV. Of the general election. XIII. Primary elections.
V. Mode of conducting elections. XIV. Contested elections.
VI. Of the qualified electors. XV. Wagers on elections.
VII. Prevention of frauds. XVI. Penalties for misconduct.
VIII. Duties of peace officers. XVII. Miscellaneous provisions.
XVIII. Nominations to office; ballots; booths.
THE purity of our elections is vitally important, not only to the welfare of our
country, but to the freedom of the people and the perpetuity of the Union of the
States. It is, therefore, of the utmost moment that every citizen should understand
the laws which regulate our elections, so that, being well informed, he may
courageously assert his own rights, and carefully avoid infringing on the rights of
others. There are many duties, by these laws, imposed upon justices of the peace
and other peace officers; they are, therefore, especially called upon to understand
them correctly and thoroughly, to the end that they may perform their duties
intelligently and uprightly.
The following pages embrace the general election laws in force throughout the
commonwealth. There are various laws applicable only to particular localities
which have, for the most part, been referred to in the notes, but the insertion of
them at large would have inconveniently extended this chapter; the student is
therefore referred to the pages of Purdon’s Digest, and of the Pamphlet Laws, for
a more particular notice of such local statutes.
I. ELECTION OF INSPECTORS OF THE GENERAL ELECTION.
It shall be the duty of the constable or constables of each township, ward and
district, at least ten days before the day hereinafter appointed for the election of
inspectors, to give public notice, by six or more printed or written advertisements
affixed at as many of the most public places therein, of the time and place of hold-
ing such election.*’
In case of the neglect, refusal, death or absence from the county, of the constable
or constables of qny township, ward or district, the supervisors of the township or
district, or the assessors of the ward, as the case may be, shall perform the duties
hereinbefore required to be done by such constable or constables, under the like
14 Bl. Com. 168. Lewis’ Cr. L. 235. 3 2 Overt. 108.
24 Clark 56. 8 Haz. Pa. Reg. 305. Com, v. * Act 2 July 1839 2 1. Purd. 378,
Richmond, Franklin Gazette, 17 June 1818.
ELECTIONS. 371
penalty: Provided, That the said supervisors or assessors shal] not be required to
give more than five days’ notice of the time and place for holding such election.)
The qualified citizens of the several wards, districts and townships shall meet in
every year, at the time and place of holding the election for constable of such ward,
district or township, and then and there elect, as hereinafter provided, two inspectors
and one judge of elections.”
Each of such qualified citizens shall vote for one person as judge, and also for
one person as inspector of elections, and the person having the greatest number
of votes for judge shall be publicly declared to be elected judge, and the two
persons having the greatest number of votes for inspectors, shall, in like manner,
be declared to be elected inspectors of elections®
The elections, as aforesaid, shall be opened at “ seven’ o’clock in the forenoon, by
a public proclamation thereof, made by the officers appointed to hold the same, and
to be kept open until seven o’clock * * * in the afternoon, when the polls shall be
closed, the number of votes be forthwith ascertained, and the persons highest in
vote, publicly declared to be elected.®
Where any township has been, or shall be, divided in forming an election district,
the qualified citizens of each part of such divided township, shall severally elect,
in the manner and at the time and place aforesaid, two inspectors for each of said
several election districts, and shall also elect one person to serve as judge of the
elections in each district, to perform the duties enjoined by the 6th section of this
act.®
As soon as the election for inspectors and judges of election shall be finished, the
inspectors and judges of such election shall make out duplicate returns, under their
hands and seals, setting forth, in words at length, the number of votes given for the
several persons voted for as inspectors and judge, and also for each township officer
voted for at such election; one of which they shall, together with the tickets, list
of taxables, list of voters, tally papers and the certificates of the oath or affirmation
taken and subscribed by the inspectors, judges and clerks, carefully collect and
deposit in one or more of the ballot boxes, which boxes, together with the remaining
ones, shall be secured, delivered and kept as for similar boxes is directed in the 74th
section of the act to which this is a supplement, until the next general election
to be held thereafter ; and the other duplicate shall be delivered by the judge of
such election, within five days thereafter, to the clerk of the court of quarter sessions
of the proper county, to be filed in his office; and the said inspectors and judge shall
also make out a certificate of election, for each person chosen as an inspector, judge
or township officer, which certificate shall be delivered to the person so chosen, or
left at his usual place of abode, by the constable of the proper ward, township,
district or borough, within five days after such election.’
The general, special, city, incorporated district, and township elections, and all
elections for electors of president and vice-president of the United States, shall be
held and conducted by the inspectors and judges elected as aforesaid, and by clerks
appointed as is hereinafter provided.®
Every judge, inspector and clerk as aforesaid, shall receive the sum of one dollar
and fifty cents, except the city and county of Philadelphia, where they shall receive
“five” dollars each, for every day employed in the duties required of him by law,
in conducting the general, special or township elections, to be paid by the treasurer
of the proper county, on orders to be drawn upon him by the commissioners ; which
allowance shall be in full for his services and expenses other than the mileage
? Act 2 July 1839 32. Pamph. 519
Pars. 525. Where a poll is kept open after the
2 Ibid. 2 3. Purd. 728,
proper hour, and the number of votes polled
® Ibid. 3 4.
4 By act 30 January 1874 2 5, at all elections
the polls shall be opened at seven o'clock A. M.
and closed at seven o’clock p.m. Purd. 727.
5 Act 2 July 1839 2 5. It is a sufficient
ground to set aside an election, that the polls
Were closed at an earlier hour than prescribed
by law. 2 Pars. 526. So also, if they were
Opened at a much later hour than the time pre-
Scribed by law. 68 Penn. St. 333. But it is no
objection, if the polls are closed at the proper
hour, that a number of voters were in attend-
ance whose votes were thereby excluded. 2
afterwards can be clearly ascertained, if the
whole of those votes could not change the result,
the election will not for that cause be set aside ;
but where the majority is small, and the result
rendered doubtful, by uncertainty as to the
number of votes polled after the legal hour, the
election must be set aside, 3 Clark.11. And
see Bright. Elect. Cas. 455. 1 Brewst. 162. 2
Ibid. 1. 29 Ill. 54. 8N. Y. 67. Bright. Elect.
Cas. 451.
6 Act 2 July 1839 37. Purd. 728.
7 Act 13 June 1840 2 1.
8 Act 2 July 1839 3 14. Purd. 728.
372 ELECTIONS.
hereinafter allowed, and in lieu of all kinds of refreshment which may have been cus-
tomary to provide, and no such expense for refreshment shall be paid or allowed by
the commissioners of any county.
The act 6 June 1893,” provides that upon a tie in the election for judge, the majority
inspector shall appoint a judge, and where there is also a tie between the two in-
spectors, they shall determine by lot who shall be majority inspector, and the latter
shall then appoint the judge.
II. ELEcTION DISTRICTS.
Townships, and wards of cities or boroughs, shall form or be divided into election
districts of compact and contiguous territory, in such manner as the court of quarter
sessions of the city or county in which the same are located may direct; but districts
in cities of over one hundred thousand inhabitants shall be divided by the courts of
quarter sessions, having jurisdiction therein, whenever, at the next preceding elec-
tion, more than two hundred and fifty votes shall have been polled therein ; and other
election districts, whenever the court of the proper county shall be of opinion,
that the convenience of the electors and the public interests will be promoted
thereby.’ : .
The several courts of quarter sessions of this copymonwealth shall have authority,
within their respective counties, to divide townships into two or more election dis-
tricts, so as to suit the convenience of the inhabitants thereof.*
Upon application by petition of twenty electors of the township to said court of
quarter sessions, for the purpose of dividing any township into election districts, said
court shall appoint three impartial men to inquire into the propriety of granting the
prayer of the petition; and it shall be the duty of the commissioners so appointed, or
any of them, to make a plot or draft of the proposed new election district or districts,
if the same cannot be fully designated by natural lines or boundaries, all of which
they or any two of them shall report to the next court of quarter sessions, together
with their opinion of the same.® ‘
When a report has been made by said commissioners, it shall be confirmed nis:
by said court, which confirmation shall become absolute, unless exceptions be filed
to the same, not later than the third day of the next term of said court; and
should exceptions be filed as aforesaid, they snall be disposed of, on evidence, as
said court shall deem just: Provided, That if desired, a review may be had, if, in
the opinion of the court, it may be necessary to secure a fair adjudication of the
same; said review to be asked for before the report has been absolutely confirmed,
however.§
Whenever said report shall have been confirmed by the court, said court shall,
at the same time, decree or establish the place for holding the elections in the said
new election district, and appoint the election board for holding the elections in
said new election district, till an election board shall be elected for the same as pro-
vided by law.’ s
Upon application by petition of freeholders, as provided for in the second section
of this act, for the purpose of annexing one election district or township to another,
the court of quarter sessions shall appoint viewers or commissioners, as provided for
in the second section of this act, whose duty it shall be to view the premises and
make a draft of the townships or election districts proposed to be consolidated or
annexed, and make their report at the next court of quarter sessions after their
appointment ; and if the said commissioners, or a majority of them, shall report in
favor of the annexation or consolidation of the two townships or election districts,
the said court shall confirm the same nzs¢, and order a special election to be held in
each of the townships or election districts, at a time to be fixed by said court, not
1 Act 2 July 1839 392. Purd. 728. In Phil- peals all prior legislation as to the mode of
adelphia, the compensation of election officers is dividing wards, boroughs and townships into
fixed at $5 per day, by act 18 April 1853 2.14. lection districts. 11 Phila. 645.
Pamph. 824. In Alleghany county, at $2.50 ¢ Act 18 May 1876 31. Purd. 723.
per day, by act 26 February 1872. Pamph. 5 Act 24 June 1885. Purd. 724. See 1 Kulp.
158, And see act 15 April 1869, as to North- 130. 1 Lack. L. Rec. 495.
ampton county. Pamph. 982. § Act 18 May 1876 3 38. Purd. 724,
2 Purd. 729. TTbid. 2 4.
® Const. art. VIII. 3 11. This virtually re-
ELECTIONS. 873
more than sixty days from the confirmation nis, to vote upon the question of
annexation ; and if a majority of the qualified voters of each of said townships
or election districts shall vote in favor of the annexation or consolidation of the said
townships, the said court shall order and decree such consolidation or annexation
of the said townships or election districts; and the place of holding elections of the
townships or election districts so consolidated shall be at the usual place of holding
elections in the more populons of the two townships so consolidated : Provided,
That the court of common pleas shall have power to adjust the indebtedness of the
said townships incurred prior to their consolidation, in such a manner that onl
the property within the old territorial limits of each township shall be liable for
such indebtedness: And provided further, That in any case where a majority of
voters in each of any two townships have heretofore voted in favor of annexation
or consolidation of such townships, such annexation shall be legal and valid, as if
done under the provisions of’ this act.’
The compensation of said commissioners shall be the same as that now paid to
road viewers, and to be paid in the same maaner.?
In all cases of the division or creation of election districts by the court of
quarter sessions of any county in this commonwealth, the said court shall order
the costs and expenses thereof to be paid from the treasury of the proper county ;
and on such order being made, the county commissioners shall draw their warrant
for the payment of the same.
In all cases in which any court of quarter sessions of this commonwealth shall de-
clare any borough incorporated by said court a separate election district, the said court
shall fix the place for holding the general elections therein, and the same shall con-
tinue to be the place for holding such elections, unless and until the same shall be
changed in the manner provided by existing laws.’
In cases where five responsible citizens of any election district shall appear before
any law judge of aay county in this commonwealth, in chambers, there being no
court sitting, and state on oath, that owing to fire or impossibility to obtain the
room, or any other unavoidable cause, the election cannot be held in their district,
at the place designated by the sheriff’s proclamation, the judge shall have power to
designate some other convenient place, and shall at once notify the constable of the
district, who shall notify the election board and the citizens of the district, as in a
spring election, and he shall receive for the same the like fee as for notifying the
voters of a spring election: Provided, That this change shall not be made within
less than three days of the election, except in cases where the building in which
the election was to be held is destroyed by fire: Provided further, That this act
shall not apply to cities of the first class.°
From and after the passage of this act it shall not be lawful for any voter in this
commonwealth, except when in actual military service of this state, or the United
States, at any election authorized by law to cast his ballot at any polling place outside
the lawfully designated election district in which he is domiciled.
It shall be the duty of the several courts of quarter sessions of the several counties
of the commonwealth to designate the polling places within the election districts in
the manner now provided by law.
No public election shall be held in any room any part of which is used for the sale
of liquors, if it be possible to obtain another room for that purpose in the vicinity,
and it shall be the duty of the court of quarter sessions, or any law judge thereof, to
inquire, upon the petition of five or more citizens resident in the election district,
whether any such rooms are now designated as polling places, and in such cages to
select other places for holding the elections.’
III. ReaistRy OF ELECTORS.
For the purpose of making the original annual assessment and registration of voters
in each of the election districts of this commonwealth, it shall be the duty of each of
the assessors, who are required to perform any of the duties incident to the holding of
elections and the registration of voters in the different election districts of this com-
1 Act 18 May 1876 3 5. Purd. 724. delphia, the power to change the places of hold-
2 Ibid. 2 6. , ing elections is conferred upon councils, by aot
3 Act 18 March 1875. Purd. 724. 21 April 1855. Purd. 726.
4 Act 17 April 1866. Purd 725. 6 Act 18 April 1893. Purd. 726.
® Act 18 June 1883. Purd. 726. In Phila- T Act 19 May 1887. Ibid. 727.
374 ELECTIONS.
monwealth, to visit in person each and every dwelling house in his district on the
first Monday in May and on the first Monday in December of each year, or a8 soon
thereafter as may be possible and practicable, when all of said dwelling houses cannot
be personally visited by him on the said first Monday of May and on the first Monday
of December, and to make a list in a book prepared for that purpose by the county
commissioners, of all the qualified electors that he shall find, upon careful and diligent
inquiry, to be bond fide residents of his district, together with the date when such
dwelling house was visited by the assessor, entering them in such book in the order
in which such dwelling houses are visited; and the qualified electors in each dwelling
house being grouped together, and if in a city or town, the names of the qualified
electors shall be grouped together by streets, alleys or courts, and the persons so
found to be legally qualified electors shall forthwith be assessed; the assessor shall, in
all cases, personally ascertain by careful and diligent inquiry of the voter or of some
known resident of the election district in which the voter claims the right to vote,
upon what ground each person so assessed claims to be a legally qualified voter.
The list thus prepared shall be designated and known as the “ Original registry
list.”’ It shall be the duty of said assessor to enter in said “‘ Original registry list”
the names of the male citizens twenty-one years of age and upwards, claiming to be
qualified voters in the election district of which he is the assessor; and opposite each
of said names state whether said citizen is or is not a housekeeper; and if he is, the
number of his residence in cities or towns where the same are numbered, with the
street, alley or court in which situated, and if in a city or town where there are no
numbers, the name of the street, alley or court on which said house fronts; also the
occupation of the person at the date of such assessment, and where he is not a house-
keeper, the occupation, place of boarding and with whom at the date of his assess-
ment; and if working for another, the name of the employer; and write opposite
each of said names the word “ voter.’’
Where any person claims to vote by reason of naturalization, he shall exhibit his
certificate theseof to the assessor, unless he has been for two consecutive years next
preceding, a voter in said district ; and in all cases where the person has been natural-
ized, the name shall be marked with the letter ‘‘N;’’ where the person has merely
declared his intentions to become a citizen and designs to be naturalized before the
next election, he shall exhibit the certificate of his declaration of intention and the
name shall be marked ‘‘ D. I.;’’ and where the person shall be entitled by existing
laws to be naturalized without making a declaration of his intentions to be naturalized,
and intends to be naturalized at least one month before the next general election, the
name of such person shall be marked “I. N.;’’ where the claim is to vote by reason
of being of the age of twenty-one years and under twenty-two, as provided by law, the
word ‘‘age’’ shall be entered, and if the person has moved into the election district
to reside since the last general election, the lettter “ R.’’ shall be placed opposite the
name.
It shall be the duty of the said assessor to forthwith make duplicate copies of the
said original list, with the observations and explanations required to be noted as afore-
said, to be made out as soon as practicable. It shall be his duty, on or prior to the
fourth Monday of May and on or prior to the second Monday of December in each
year, to return one of said duplicate copies to the county commissioners for file in
their office, and to place the other of said duplicate copies on the door of, or on the
house where the election of the respective district is required to be held, and retain the
original list in his possession for the inspection, free of charge, of any person resident
in the said election district who shall desire to see the same; and it shall be the duty
of the said assessor to assess, from time to time, on the personal application of any
one claiming the right to vote, the name of such claimant and mark opposite the
name ‘‘C. V.,’’ and immediately assess him, noting, as in all other cases, his occupa-
tion, residence, the date of his assessment, whether a boarder or housekeeper, if a
boarder with whom he boards and whether naturalized or designing to be, marking in
all cases opposite the name the letter “N.,”’ “D. 1.” or “I. N.,” as the case may
be; if the person claiming to be assessed be naturalized, he shall exhibit to the
assessor his certificate of naturalization; and if he claim that he designs to be natu-
ralized before the next ensuing election, he shall exhibit the certificate of his declara-
at of intention, if such previous declaration is required by the laws of the United
tates.
ELECTIONS. 875
It shall be the duty of the said assessor to be present at the election house ot the
said election district during the two secular days next preceding the day fixed by the
third section of this act for returning the lists to the county commissioners, from ten
ante-meridian to three post-meridian, and from six post-meridian to nine post-merid-
ian, of each of said days, for the purpose of hearing and acting upon applications to
be made under the provisions of this section, or relating to names upon said list or
that are sought to be placed thereon or struck therefrom, and it shall be his duty to
correct said original list by adding thereto, upon personal application, the names of
persons entitled to vote, not already thereon, and by striking therefrom fictitious
‘ name or names of persons who may have died or removed from said district; and in
all cases it shal! be the duty of the said assessor to enter in his dook, opposite the
name of each voter, the name or names of the person or persons, together with the
residence of the same, who shall furnish information as to the residence and qualifica-
tions of each voter who has been assessed, or as to the persons whose names shall be
stricken from said original list ; and the said original list shall be open for inspection
by any qualified elector of the county or ward in which the election district is situated,
as well as by the person claiming to be registered ; and the court ot common pleas of
the proper county, or any law judge thereof at chambers, on the application of any
qualified elector of the ward or county under oath, setting forth a breach of any of the
duties imposed on said assessor by this act, which oath may be made at any time
before the date of election, shall call the assessor and the complainant before it or him
by citation or rule to show cause, and shall hear the paaties and dispose of the sub-
ject in a summary manner, as to law and justice shall belong, and shall, if’ need be,
order the assessor to correct the registry accordingly, and the said court or judge may
enforce such order by attachment as in proceedings for contempt.
After the assessments have been completed on the sixty-first day before the third
Tuesday of February, and on the sixty-first day before the Tuesday next following the
first Monday of November in each year, the assessor shall, on the following day, make
a return to the county commissioners of the “‘ Original registry list’’ thus revised and
completed and two exact copies thereof, and the county commissioners shall there-
upon proceed to make out a complete list in alphabetical order of all persons so re-
turned as resident taxables in said election district, and furnish the same, together
with the necessary election blanks to the officers of the election in such election dis-
trict, on or before seven o’clock on the morning of the election; and no man shall be
permitted to vote at the election on that day whose name is not on said list, unless he
shall make proof of his right to vote as hereinbefore required.
It shall be the duty of the assessor in all voting districts or precincts in this com-
monwealth, where temporary voting places are or may be established, to be present
at his place of residence in said election district or precinct during the two secular
days next preceding the day fixed by the third section of the act of May twenty-ninth,
one thousand eight hundred and ninety-one, being a supplement to the act of January
thirtieth, Anno Domini one thousand eight hundred and seventy-four, for returning
the list to the county commissioners, from ten ante-meridian to three post-meridian,
and from six post-meridian to nine post-meridian of each of said days, to perform all
the duties as set forth in section two of the act of May twenty-ninth, one thousand
eight hundred and ninety-one, being a supplement to the act of January thirtieth,
one thousand eight hundred and seventy-four.*
It shall be the duty of said assessors, respectively, to attend at the place of holding
every general, special or township election, during the whole time said election is
kept open, for the purpose of giving information to the inspectors and judge, when
called on, in relation to the right of any person assessed by them to vote at such elec-
tion, or such other matters in relation to the assessment of voters, as the said inspec-
tors or judge, or either of them, shall from time to time require ; for which attendance
said assessor shall be entitled to the sum of one dollar per day, to be paid as officers
of election are paid by law ; and when the township is divided for which said assessor
is elected, he shall attend at the election district in which he resides, and is entitled
to vote.”
1 These seven paragraphs are the act 29 May non-registered voters, see act 30 January 1874.
1891. Purd. 722. As to the proof required of Purd. 735.
2 Act 2 July 1839. Purd. 721.
376 ELECTIONS.
IV. OF THE GENERAL ELECTION.
It shall be the duty of the sheriff of every county, at least ten days before any
general election to be held therein, to give notice of the same by proclamation, posted
up in the most public places in every election district, or by advertisements in at least
two newspapers, if there be so many published in the county, representing so far as
practicable the political parties which at the preceding election cast the largest and
next largest number of votes, and in every such proclamation or advertisement shall,
J. Enumerate the officers to be elected and give a list of all the nominations made
as provided in this act, and to be voted for in such county as far as may be in the
form in which they shall appear upon the ballots, and the full text of all constitu-
tional amendments submitted to a vote of the people, but the proclamations posted in
each election district need not contain the names of any candidates but those to be
voted for in such district.
II. Designate the place at which the election is to be held.
III. He shall give notice that every person, excepting justices of the peace, who shall
hold any office or appointment of profit or trust under the government of the United
States, or of this state, or of any city, or incorporated district, whether a commis-
sioned officer or otherwise, a subordinate officer or agent who is or shall be employed
under the legislative, executive or judiciary department of this state, or of the United
State, or of any city, or incorporated district, and also that every member of Congress
and of the state legislature, and of the select or common council of any city, or com-
missioners of any incorporated district, is by law incapable of holding or exercising at
the same time the office or appointment of judge, inspector or clerk of any election of
this commonwealth, and that no inspector, judge or other officer of any such election
shall be eligible to any office to be then voted for, except that of an election officer.’
The thirteenth section of the act, passed July 2d 1839, entitled ‘‘an act relating to
the elections of this commonwealth,” shall not be so construed as to prevent any
militia officer or borough officer from serving as judge, inspector or clerk, at any
general or special election inthis commonwealth.?7
All persons acting as judges and inspectors of the general election in the city and
county of Philadelphia may be re-elected, any law to the contrary notwithstanding.*
No person shall be disqualified from serving as an election officer or canvasser by
reason of his employment (in the city of Philadelphia) in any subordinate position in
any public office.*
The inspectors and judges, chosen as aforesaid, shall meet at the respective places
appointed for holding the election in the district to which they respectively belong,
before nine o’clock in the morning of the ‘‘ Tuesday next following the first Monday
of November,’’ in each and every year, and each of said inspectors shall appoint one
clerk, who sha!] be a qualified voter of such district.®
In case the person who shall have received the second highest number of votes for
inspector, shall not attend on the day of any election, then the person who shall have
received the second highest number of votes for judge at the next preceding election,
shall act as an inspector in his place; and in case the person who shall have received
the highest number of votes for inspector shall not attend, the person elected judge
shall appoint an inspector in his place ;* and in case the person elected a judge shall
not attend, then the inspector who received the highest number of votes shall
appoint a judge in his place;’ and if any vacancy® shall continue in the board for
the space of one hour after the time fixed by law for opening of the election, the
qualified voters of the township,.ward or district, for which such officer shall have
1 Act 10 June 1893 310. Purd. 727.
2 Act 16 April 1840 34, Purd. 729.
® Act 28 April 1851 36. Ibid.
* Act 6 April 1870 2 3. Ibid.
power to make an appointment to fill the va-
cancy in the office of judge. Penn. District
Election Case, Com. Pleas, Phila., 7 December
1847. MS.
5 Act 2 July 1839 315. Purd. 730.
6 The person so appointed is entitled to act
for the whole year. Anon., Com. Pleas, Phila.
March 1852. MS. See Bright. Hlect. Cas. 523
n. 8N. Y¥. 67, 88.
1 Where an election judge appointed a person
inspector, in the place of the one who received
the highest number of votes, he being absent,
and the judge subsequently removed from the
ward; held, that the inspector so avnointed had
8 Upon the division of an election district,
the functions of the election officers are de-
stroyed, and cannot be exercised in either of
the new election districts into which the old one
is divided, The official functions of local offi-
cers fall with the political annihilation of the
locality for which they were chosen or ap-
pointed. Bright. Elect. Cas, 517. 3S. & RB.
121. And see 11 Phila. 300.
ELECTIONS. 377
been elected, present at the place of election, shall elect one of their number to fill
such vacancy.
In case any clerk, appointed under the provisions of this act, shall neglect to attend
at any election during said year, it shall be the duty of the inspector who appointed
said clerk (or the person filling the place of such inspector) to forthwith appoint a
suitable person as clerk, qualified as aforesaid, who shall perform said duties for the
year.
The inspectors, judges and clerks aforesaid shall, before entering on the duties of
their offices, severally take and subscribe the oath or affirmation hereinafter directed,*
which shall be administered to them by any judge, alderman or justice of the peace ;
but if no such magistrate be present, one of the inspectors of the election shall admin-
ister the oath or affirmation to the other judge and inspector, and then the inspector
so qualified shall administer the oath or affirmation to him.‘
The following shall be the form of the oath or affirmation to be taken by each in-
spector, viz.: ‘J, (A. B.) do that Iwill duly attend to the ensuing election,
during the continuance thereof, as an inspector, and that I will not receive any ticket
or vote from any person other than such as I shall firmly believe to be, according to the
provisions of the constitution and the laws of this commonwealth, entitled to vote at
such election, without requiring such evidence of the right to vote as is directed by law,
nor will I vexatiously delay or refuse to receive any vote from any person whom I shall
believe to be entitled to vote as aforesaid, but that I will in all things truly, impartially
and faithfully perform my duty therein, to the best of my judgment and abilities ; and
that Iam not, directly nor indirectly, interested in any bet or wager on the result of this
election.’’®
The following shall be the oath or affirmation of each judge, viz.: ‘‘I, (A. B.)
do that I will, as judge, duly attend the ensuing election during the continuance
thereof, and faithfully assist the inspectors in carrying on the same; that I will not give
my consent that any vote or ticket shall be received from any person other than such as
I firmly believe to be according to the provisions of the constitution and laws of this
commmonwealth, entitled to vote at such election, without requiring such evidence of the
right to vote as is directed by law, and that I will use my best endeavors to prevent any
Jraud, deceit or abuse, in carrying on the same by citizens qualified to vote, or others,
and that Iwill make a true and perfect return of the said election, and will in all
things truly, impartially and faithfully perform my duty respecting the same, to the
best of my judgment and abilities; and that Iam not, directly or indirectly, interested
in any bet or wager on the result of this election.’ ®
The following shall be the form of the oath or affirmation to be taken by each clerk,
viz.: ‘‘Z(A.B.) do that I will impartially and truly write down the name of
each elector who shall vote at the enswiny election, which shall be given me in charge,
and also the name of the township, ward or district wherein such elector resides, and
carefully and truly write down the number of votes that shall be given for each candi-
date at the election, as often as his name shal! be read to me by the inspectors thereof,
and in all things truly and faithfully perform my duty by the inspectors thereof, and
in all things truly and faithfully perform my duty respecting the same, to the best
of my judgment and ability ; and that I am not, directly or indirectly, interested in any
bet or wager on the result of this election.’’™
1 Act 2 July 1839 316. Purd. 730. Where
a township is divided into election districts,
under the act 18 May 1876, the court appoints
the election board for the new districts, until an
election is held for that purpose. Purd. 723.
2 Act 2 July 1839 317. Purd. 730.
3 Where one of the clerks, by intoxication,
was unable to continue his labors, and another
person was called to act in his place, but was
not sworn, and continued to officiate until the
regular clerk was able to resume his duties,
the court refused to set an election aside on that
ground, there being no allegation of fraud or
mistake in conducting thd election, 2 Pars,
503. 1 Brewst. 69. Ibid. 140. 1t is a general
rule of elections, that mere irregularities which
do not tend to affect results, are not to defeat
the will of the majority. But where the law has
prescribed a time and place of election, and
designated the officers who are to conduct it, a
majority may not set up other officers and hold
a separate election. 20 Penn, St. 493. 8 N.Y.
69. 1 Brewst. 67. 2 Luz. L. Reg. 19. 3 Ibid.
13. Where a ward or district is divided into
precincts, the illegality of an election in one of
them, in consequence of an improper person
acting as judge, will not render the whole eleo-
tion void; if the election in the other precinct
was properly conducted, that poll will decide
the election. Case of Penn District Election,
Com. Pleas, Phila., 11 May 1850. MS.
4 Act 2 July 1839 318. Purd. 730,
5 Ibid. 2 19.
6 Ibid. 9 20. Purd. 731.
7 Ibid. 3 21
378 ELECTIONS.
It shall be the duty of the said clerks forthwith to make out two copies of the
forms of each of the said oaths or affirmations, which shall be severally subscribed by
each of the inspectors, judges and clerks, and the said oaths or affirmations shall be
certified under the hands of the persons by whom they shall be administered.*
The inspectors, judge and clerks, required by law to hold township and general eleo-
tions, shall take and subscribe the several oaths and affirmations, required by the
19th, 20th and 21st sections of the act of the second day of July 1839, entitled ‘‘an
act relating to the elections of this commonwealth,’’ which oaths or affirmations shall
be prepared or administered in the manner prescribed in the 18th and 22d sections of
said act; and in addition to the power conferred by the 18th section of said act, the
judge, or either of the inspectors, shall have power to administer the oaths prescribed
by said act, to any clerk of a general, special or township election.”
In addition to the oath now prescribed by law to be taken and subscribed by elec-
tion officers, they shall severally be sworn or affirmed not to disclose how any elector
shall have voted, unless required to do so, as witnesses in a judicial proceeding. All
judges inspectors, clerks and overseers of any election held under this act shall, before
entering upon their duties, be duly sworn or affirmed in the presence of each other.
The judge shall be sworn by the minority inspector, if there shall be such minority
inspector, and in case there be no minority inspector, then by a justice of the peace or
alderman ; and the inspectors, overseer and clerks shall be sworn by the judge ; certifi-
cates of such swearing or affirming shall be duly made out and signed by the officers
so sworn, and attested by the officer who administered the oath. If any judge or
minority inspector refuses or fails to swear the officers of election in the manner re-
quired by this act, or if any officer of election shall act without being first duly sworn,
or if any officer of election shall sign the form of oath, without being duly sworn, or if
any judge or minority inspector shall certify that any officer was sworn, when he was
not, it shall be deemed a misdemeanor, and upon conviction, the officer or officers so
offending shall be fined not exceeding one thousand dollars, or imprisoned not exceed-
ing one year, or both, in the discretion of the court.°
V. MopE OF CONDUCTING ELECTIONS.
The commissioners of every county within this commonwealth shall, on or before
[seven o’clock] in the morning of the day of every general, special, electoral and
township election, and at the times hereinafter specified, perform the following duties:
I. At elections, as aforesaid, they shall cause to be delivered to one of the inspectors
of every election district, within their respective counties, a sufficient number of
boxes to contain the tickets (unless the same has already been provided for said town-
ship), blank forms of election oaths, taily-papers, and returns made out in a proper
manner, and headed as the nature of the election may require.
II. At special, electoral and township elections, they shall, in addition to the fore-
going, deliver to the aforesaid inspectors certified copies, under seal of office, of the
duplicate copies delivered them to file in their respective offices, by the respective
assessors of wards, townships, incorporated districts and boroughs within their re-
spective counties, pursuant to the directions and provisions contained in the 5th seo-
tion of this act; also a sufficient number of blank forms of certificates of election, for
each person elected to any office voted for at township elections.*
At all elections hereafter held under the laws of this commonwealth, the polls shall
be opened at seven o'clock A. M., and closed at seven o’clock Pp. M.®
1 Aot 2 July 1839 3 22, Purd. 731. Adams and Franklin, by act 17 March 1855,
2 Act 13 June 1840 3 3. Purd. 731. Pamph. 99; to the counties of Dauphin and
8 Act 30 June 1874 ¢ 8. Ibid. Northumberland, by act 7 May 1855, Pamph.
* Act 13 June 1840 37. Purd. 73%. By act 478; to the county of York, by act 16 March
11 March 1852 2 17,80 much of this section
“as requires county commissioners to furnish
every election district with a list of the voters
residing therein,”’ is repealed, ‘‘so far as relates
to township elections, in the county of Lancas-
ter, and it shall be the duty of the inspectors to
whom such lists are furnished at the general
elections, to preserve the same for use at the
township elections.” Pamph. 129. The pro-
visions of the 17th section of the act 11 March
1852, are extended to the counties of Chester,
Delaware, Montgomery, Cumberland, Fayette,
1861, Pamph. 148; to the county of Washing-
ton, by act 1 May 1861, Pamph, 474; and to
the county of Armstrong, by act 18 February
1869, Pamph. 205. See act 1 April 1873,
Pamph. 475, as to Berks county.
5 Act 30 January 1874 25. Purd. 728. De-
lay in opening the polls, in consequence of in-
ability to organize the board, until after the
time prescribed by law, does not necessarily
vitiate the election. 3 Luz. L. Reg. 180. So,
the closing of the poll during the dinner-hour
ELECTIONS. 379
- At the opening of the polls, at all elections, it shall be the duty of the judges of
election for their respective districts, to designate one of the inspectors, whose duty
it shall be to have in custody the registry of voters, and to make the entries therein
required by law; and it shall be the duty of the other of said inspectors, to receive
and number the ballots presented at said election.'
All elections by the citizens shall be by ballot; every ballot voted shall be numbered
in the order in which it shall be received, and the number recorded by the clerks on
the list of voters, opposite the name of the elector from whom received; and any
voter voting two or more tickets, the several tickets so voted shall each be numbered
with the number corresponding with the number to the name of the voter. Any
elector may write his name upon his ticket, or cause the same to be written thereon,
and attested by a citizen of the district.” °
The judges of the elections, within the limits of their respective wards, districts or
townships, shall have power, and are hereby required to decide on the qualifications
of any person claiming to vote at any election, whenever the inspectors thereof shall
disagree upon the right of such person to vote, but not otherwise; and the inspectors
thereof shall, upon such decision, forthwith receive or reject the vote of such person,
as the case may be.®
No inspector shall receive any ticket from any person other than an elector residing
within the township; ward or district for which such inspector shall have been elected
or appointed.‘
The respective assessors, inspectors and judges of the election, shall each have the
power to administer oaths to any person claiming the right to be assessed, or the right
of suffrage, or in regard to any other matter or thing required to be done or inquired
into by any of the said officers, under this act; and any wilful false swearing by any
person in relation to any matter or thing, concerning which they shall be lawfully in-
terrogated by any of said officers or overseers, shall be perjury.®
VI. OF THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS.
Every male citizen,® twenty-one years of age,” possessing the following qualifica-
tions, shall be entitled to vote at all elections :
I. He shall have been a citizen of the United States at least one month.
TI. He shall have resided in the state one year (or if, having previously been a quali-
fied elector or native-born citizen of the state, he shall have removed therefrom and
returned, then six months) immediately preeeding the election.*
TII. He shall have resided in the election district ® where he shall offer to vote, at
least two months immediately preceding the election.”
IV. If twenty-two years of age or upwards, he shall have paid, within two years, a
state or county tax, which shall have been assessed at least two months, and paid at
least one month before the election.”
will not vitiate. 19 Ohio St. 25. If one of the
officers absent himself, after the poll is opened,
the others may proceed. 2 Brewst.2. 1 Ibid.
68. Election officers are privileged from arrest
on election day, except for treason, felony or
breach of the peace. 1 Brewst. 152.
1 Act 30 January 1874 3 8. Purd. 731.
2 Act 30 January 187449. Ibid, 740.
3 Act 2 July 1839 3 6. Ibid. 731.
4 Act 2 July 1839 3 68. Ibid. 732.
5 Act 2 January 1874317. Purd. 732.
6A female is not a qualified elector in this
state. 9 Phila. 241. See 11 BI. C. 0.200. 53
Mo. 58. 1 McArthur 169.
7 For the purpose of voting, a minor becomes
of age on the day preceding the 21st anniver-
sary of his birth. 1 Kulp 157.
8 The party must not only have actually re-
sided in the state one year before tendering his
vote, but such residence must have been with
the intent to become a citizen of this state, and
to abandon the citizenship the party may have
previously had in ‘inother state. Anon., Com.
Pleas. Phila., 3 November 1848. MS. See 2
Pet. Ad. 450. I Ash. 126. 1 Wall. Jr. C.C.
217. #12 Penn. St. 365. 2 Clark 82.
9 The term “election district,” signifies any
part of a city or county having fixed boundaries
within which the citizens residing therein must
vote. 2 Clark 82. Students in an institution
of learning may acquire a residence in the eleo-
tion district in which the same is located, so ag
to entitle them to vote therein. 11 Phila. 641.
But they must show that they have actually ac-
quired such residence therein. 1 Chest. Co. R.
257. Residents in an almshouse, under a con-
tract of hire, have such residence as entitles
them to vote, though they originally entered as
paupers. 10 Phila, 213. Otherwise, of paupers
who receive no wages, but merely perform cer-
tain services and are accorded certain privileges,
in return for their support. 11 W. N. C. 169.
10 This means two full calendar months. 12
W. N.C. 155.
11 The tax must have been personally assessed
upon the voter. 28.& R.267. And have been
paid in money. 1 Cong. Elect. Cas. 512-13. But
it need not be a poll-tax. 2S. & R. 267. See 12
380 ELECTIONS.
Every person claiming a right to vote at any election as aforesaid shall, if required
by either of the inspectors, make proof:
I. That he is a natural-born citizen of this commonwealth, or
II. That he was settled therein on the 28th of September 1776, and has since
continued to reside therein, or ;
III. That having been a foreigner, who since that time came to settle therein,
he took an oath or affirmation of allegiance to the same, on or before the 26th of
March, Anno Domini 1790, agreeable to the then existing constitution and laws;
and as evidence of any of the said facts, the oath or affirmation of such person
shall be sufficient, or
IV. That he is a natural-born citizen of some other of the United States, or had
been lawfully admitted or recognised as a citizem thereof, on or before the 26th
day of March 1790; and as evidence thereof, he shall, if required by any judge
or inspector of the election, produce a certificate in due form from some judge,
prothonotary, clerk of a court, mayor, alderman or justice of the peace, or shall be
examined on his oath or affirmation, or
V. That having been an alien, he has been naturalized conformable to the laws
of the United States; and as the only evidence thereof, he shall produce a certifi-
cate thereof, under the seal of the court where such naturalization took place ;?
except where such person shall have resided in said ward, district or township for
ten years or upwards next preceding such application to vote, in which case, the
oath of such applicant shall be prima facie evidence of naturalization.?
No person shall be admitted to vote whose name is not contained in the list of
taxable inhabitants furnished by the commissioners, as aforesaid,’ unless, Ist: He
produce a receipt for the payment within two years of a state or county tax,
assessed agreeable to the constitution, and give satisfactory evidence, either
on his own oath or affirmation, or the oath or affirmation of another, that he has
paid such tax, or on failure to produce a receipt, shall make oath to the payment
thereof, or, 2d: If he claim a right to vote by being an elector between the ages
of twenty-one and twenty-two years, he shall depose, on oath or affirmation, that
he has resided in the state at least one year next before his application, and make
such proof of residence in the district as is required by this act, and that he does
verily believe, from the accounts given him, that he is of the age aforesaid, and
give such other evidence as is required by this act; [whereupon the name of the
person so admitted to vote shall be inserted in the alphabetical list by the inspec-
tors, and a note made opposite thereto by writing the word * tax,’’ if he shall be
admitted to vote by reason of having paid a tax, or the word “ age,” if he shall
be admitted to vote on account of his age,] and in either case, the reason of such
vote shall be called out to the clerks, who shall make the like notes in the list of
the voters kept by them.‘
In all cases where the name of the person claiming to vote is not found on the
list furnished by the commissioners and assessor, or his right to vote, whether
found thereon or not, is objected to by any qualified citizen, it shall be the duty
of the inspectors to examine such person on oath as to his qualifications, and if
he claims to have resided within the state for one year or more, his oath shall be
sufficient proof thereof ;5 but he shall make proof by at least one competent
witness, who shall be a qualified elector, that he has resided within the district
for more than teu days next immediately preceding said election ;§ and shall also
Phila. 626. 11 Ibid. 645. 5 W.N.C.8. Pay-
ment of a mercantile tax is not a qualification.
11 W. N. C. 169. The foregoing are constitu-
tional qualifications. Art. VI. 3 1.
1 A certificate of naturalization cannot be im-
eached collaterally. 1 Browst. 183, 218, 263,
70. 3 Ibid, 601. But see 11 W. N.C. 169. 1
Del. Co. R. 222, Where the naturalization results
from that of the paront, the parent's certificate
must be produced. 13 Leg. Int. 140.
2 Act 2 July 1839 2 64.
8 See act of 1874 2 10. infra, p. 381.
* Aot 2 July 1839 2 65. Purd. 735,
5 The election officers are concluded by the
answers of the party offering to vote, as to
his residence in the state; but they have the
tight to obtain from him. full answers upon
the question, and if not satisfactory, the vote
should be rejected. Anon., Com. Pleas, Phila,
3 November 1848. MS. See 27 N. Y. 45.
6 If the name of one offering to vote is not
found on the assessors’ list, it is the duty of the
inspectors to demand proof, by at least one com-
aoe witness, who is a qualified voter, that he
as resided in the district for more than ten days,
2 Pars, 553, 580-1. An action cannot be main-
tained against an inspector for refusing a vote,
unless on proof of malice. 11 S. & R.35. 7%
Brewst. 183. Ibid. 273. 3 Ibid. 601. See Bright.
Elect. Cas, 190-6.
ELECTIONS, 381
himself swear that his bond fide residence, in pursuance of his lawful calling, is
within the district, and that he did not remove into said district for the purpose
of voting therein.
Every person qualified as aforesaid, and who shall make due proof, if required,
of his residence and payment of taxes, as aforesaid, shall be admitted to vote in the
township, ward or district in which he shall reside.?
Qn the day of election,? any person whose name shall not appear on the
registry of voters, and who claims the right to vote at said election, shall produce
at least one qualified voter of the district as a witness to the residence of the
claimant in the district in which he claims to be a voter, for the period of at
least two months immediately preceding said election, which witness shall be
sworn or affirmed, and subscribe a written or partly written and partly printed
affidavit to the facts stated by him, which affidavit shall define clearly where
the residence is of the person so claiming to be a voter; and the person so claim-
ing the right to vote shall also take and subscribe a written, or partly written and
partly printed, affidavit, stating, to the best of his knowledge and belief, when
and where he was born; that he has been a citizen of the United States for one
month, and of the commonwealth of Pennsylvania; that he has resided in the
commonwealth one year, or if formerly a qualified elector or a native-born citizen
thereof, and has removed therefrom and returned, that he has resided therein six
months next preceding said election ; that he has resided in the district in which
he claims to be a voter, for the period of at least two months immediately preced-
ing said election; that he has not moved into the district for the purpose of
voting therein; that he has, if twenty-two years of age, or upwards, paid a state
or county tax within two years, which was assessed at least two months, and paid
at least one month before the election; the said affidavit shall also state when and
where the tax claimed to be paid by the affiant was assessed, and when and where,
and to whom paid; and the tax receipt therefor shall be produced for examination,
unless the affiant shall state in his affidavit that it has been lost or destroyed, or that
he never received any; and if a naturalized citizen, shall also state when, where
and by what court, he was naturalized, and shall also produce his certificate of
naturalization for examination.‘
But if the person so claiming the right to vote shall take and subscribe an
affidavit that he is a native-born citizen of the United States, or, if born else-
where, shall state the fact in his affidavit, and shall produce evidence that he has
been naturalized, or that he is entitled to citizenship by reason of his father’s
naturalization, and shall further state in his affidavit, that he is, at the time of
making the affidavit, of the age of twenty-one, and under twenty-two years: that
he has been a citizen of the United States one month, and has resided in the state
one year; or, if a native-born citizen of the state and removed therefrom and
returned, that he has resided therein six months next preceding said election,
and in the election district two months immediately preceding such election, he
shall be entitled to vote, although he shall not have paid taxes.
The said affidavits of all persons making such claims, and the affidavits of the
witnesses to their residence, shall be preserved by the election board, and at
the close of the election, they shall be inclosed, with the list of voters, tally-list and
other papers required by law to be filed by the return-judge with the prothonotary,
and shall remain on file therewith, in the prothonotary’s office, subject to examina-
tion as other election papers are. If the election officers shall find that the appli-
cant possesses all the legal qualifications of a voter, he shall be permitted to vote,
and his name shall be added to the list of taxables, by the election officers, the word
“tax,” being added where the claimant claims to vote on tax, and the word “ age,’’
where he claims to vote on age; the same words being added by the clerks, in each
case, respectively, on the lists of persons voting at such election:
1 Act 2 July 1839 2 66. Purd. 735. from @ person not on the registry, is illegal, and
2 Ibid. 2 67. will be rejected in case of a contest. 105 Penn.
3 The constitution, art. VIII. 3 12, provides St.488. 4 Brewst. 531. 3 Luz. L. Reg. 10. Ibid.
that the general election shall be held on the 13. 7 Leg. Gaz. 70. 2 Brewst. 1. And that,
Tuesday next following the first Monday of No- without regard to the question whether the person
vember. was actually qualified or not. 105 Penn. St. 488,
4 Every vote received without such affidavit, 5 Act 30 January 1874 310. Purd. 735-6.
382 ELECTIONS.
It shall be lawful for any qualified citizen of the district, notwithstanding the
name of the proposed voter is contained on the list of resident taxables, to challenge
the vote of such person, whereupon the same proof of the right of suffrage, as is
now required by law, shall be publicly made and acted on by the election board, and
the vote admitted or rejected, according to the evidence. Every person claiming
to be a naturalized citizen shall be required to produce his naturalization certificate,
at the election, before voting, except where he has been for five years consecutively
a voter in the district in which he offers his vote; and on the vote of such person
being received, it shall be the duty of the election officers to write or stamp on such
certificate the word “voted,” with the day, month and year; and if any election
officer or officers shall receive a second vote on the same day, by virtue of the same
certificate, excepting where sons are entitled to vote, because of the naturalization
of their fathers, they and the person who shall offer such second vote shall be guilty
of a misdemeanor, and on conviction thereof, shall be fined or imprisoned, or both,
at the discretion of the court; but the fine shall not exceed five hundred dollars in
each case, nor the imprisonment one year. The like punishment shall be inflicted,
on conviction, on the officers of election who shall neglect or refuse to make, or
cause to be made, the indorsement required .as aforesaid on said naturalization cer-
tificate.*
If any election officer shall refuse or neglect to require such proof of the right
of suffrage as is prescribed by this law, or the laws to which this is a supplement,
from any person offering to vote, whose name is not on the list of assessed voters,
or whose right to vote is challenged by any qualified voter present, and shall admit
such person to vote, without requiring such proof, every person so offending shall,
upon conviction, be guilty of a misdemeanor, and shall be sentenced, for every
such offence, to pay a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars, or to undergo an
imprisonment not more than one year, or both, at the discretion of the court.?
In all elections, hereafter, the certificate of naturalization, if genuine, shall be
conclusive evidence of the facts mentioned therein; and where the person offering
to vote claims the right on the payment of tax, the receipt for such tax, if signed
by the proper officer, shall be the evidence thereof; if such person does not produce
such receipt, then the payment of the tax may be proved by the oath of such person,
or other evidence, stating when, where and to whom such tax was paid.®
Citizens of this state temporarily in the service of the state or of the United
States governments, on clerical or other duty, and who do not vote where thus
employed, shall not be thereby deprived of the right to vote in their several elec-
tion districts, if otherwise duly qualified.*
‘So much of every act of assembly as provides that only white freemen shall be
entitled to vote or to be registered as voters, or as claiming to vote at any gen-
eral or special election of this commonwealth, is hereby repealed; and here-
after all freemen, without distinction of color, shall be enrolled and registered,
according to the provisions of the first section of the act approved April 17th, 1869,
entitled “an act further supplemental to the act relative to the elections of this
commonwealth,” and shall, when otherwise qualified under existing laws, be entitled
to vote at all general and special elections in this commonwealth: Provided, This
act shall in no way reduce the compensation of the assessors of Philadelphia, which
shall be one thousand dollars, as now established by law.®
VII. PREVENTION OF FRAUDS.
On the petition of five or more citizens of any election district, setting forth that
the appointment of overseers is a reasonable precaution to secure the purity and fair-
ness of the election in said district, it shall be the duty of the court of common
pleas of the proper county, all the law judges of the said court, able to act at the
time, concurring, to appoint two judicious, sober and intelligent citizens of the said
district, belonging to different political parties, overseers of election to supervise the
proceedings of election officers thereof, and to make report of the same as they may
1 Act 30 January 1874 311. Purd. 736. 4 Act 17 April 1869 3 19. Purd. 733,
2 Toid. 312. See 105 Penn. St.488. 1 Del. Co. § Act 6 April 18703 10. Ibid. See 92 U.S
‘R. 50. 214, 542. 110 Ibid. 651. 10 Biss 283.
3 Act 13 February 1874 33. Purd. 737.
ELECTIONS. 383
be required by such court. Said overseers shall be persons qualified to serve
upon election boards, and shall have the right to be present with the officers of such
clection, during the whole time the same is held, the votes counted, and the returns
made out and signed by the election officers; to keep a list of voters, if they see
proper; to challenge any person offering to vote, and interrogate him and his
witnesses, under oath, in regard to his right of suffrage of said election, and to
examine his papers produced: and the officers of said election are required to afford
to said overseers, so selected and appointed, every convenience and facility for the
discharge of their duties. And if said election officers shall refuse to permit said
overseers to be present, and perform their duties as aforesaid, such officer or officers
shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and on conviction thereof, shall be fined not
exceeding one thousand dollars, or imprisoned not exceeding one year, or both, in
the discretion of the court. Or, if the overseers shall be driven away from the
polls by violence or intimidation, all the votes polled in such election district may
be rejected by the proper tribunal trying a contest under said election; or a part or
portion of such votes aforesaid may be counted, as such tribunal may deem neces-
sary to a just and proper disposition of the case.’
VIII. Duties oF PEACE OFFICERS.
Tt shall be the duty of every mayor, sheriff, deputy-sheriff, alderman, justice of
the peace, and constable or deputy-constable of every city, county and township
or district within this commonwealth, whenever called upon by any officer of an elec-
tion, or by any three qualified electors thereof, to clear any window, or avenue to
any window, at the place of the general election, which shall be obstructed in such
a way as to prevent voters from approaching the same, and on neglect or refusal
(so) to do, on such requisition, said officer shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor
in office, and on conviction, shall be fined in any sum not less than one hundred,
nor more than one thousand dollars. And it shall be the duty of the respective
constables of each ward, district or township within this commonwealth, to be present
in person, or by deputy, at the place of holding such elections in said ward, district
or township, for the purpose of preserving the peace as aforesaid.’ :
It shall be the duty of every peace officer as aforesaid, who shall be present at
any such disturbance at an election as is described in this act, to report the same to
the next court of quarter sessions, and also the names of the witnesses who can
prove the same; and it shall be the duty of said court to cause indictment to be
preferred before the grand jury against the persons so offending.
If it shall be made appear to any court of quarter sessions of this commonwealth,
that any riot or disturbance occurred at the time and place of holding any election
under this act, and the constables who are enjoined by law to attend to such elec-
tions have not given information thereof, according to the provisions of this act, it
shall be the duty of said court to cause the officer or officers, so neglecting the
duty aforesaid, to be proceeded against by indictment for a misdemeanor in office ;
and on conviction thereof, the said officer shall be fined in any sum not exceeding
one hundred dollars.®
It shall be the duty of the several courts of quarter sessions of this common-
wealth, at the next term of said court after any election shall have been held under
this act, to cause the respective constables in said county to be examined on oath,
as to whether any breaches of the peace took place at the election within their
respective townships, wards or districts ; and it shall be the duty of said constables
respectively to make return thereof as part of their official return at said court.®
give notice to the people to remove themselves,
1 Act 30 January 1874 3 4. Purd. 746, ‘See
before proceeding to violent measures ; but hav-
4 Brewst. 531. An entire division will not be
thrown out, unless the disregard of law has been
so fundamental, or so persistent and continuous,
as to render it impossible to distinguish what
votes were lawful, and what were unlawful, or to
arrive at any certain result whatever; or where
the great body of the voters has been prevented,
by violence, intimidation or threats from exer-
cising their franchise. 10 Phila. 389. 82 Penn.
St. 297. 68 Ibid. 333. And see 1 Brewst. 11,
67, 162, 2Tbid. 1. 27 Leg. Int. 181. 34 Ibid. 97.
11 W.N. C. 169.
ing given this notice, he has the right to use as
much force as may be necessary to accomplish the
object; and every citizen who is called on to as-
sist him, is bound to do so. Commonwealth v.
Hamilton, Lancaster Q. S., 22 January 1849. MS.
3 Act 2 July 18393111. Purd. 747.
* Ibid. 3 112.
5 Ibid. 2 113.
6 Thid. Sid Repealed as to Bradford and
Susquehanna counties, by act 19 March 1869.
Pamph. 441.
384 ELECTIONS.
It shall not be lawful, after the passage of this act, for the sheriff of any county
co-extensive in boundaries with any city of the first class, to appoint any deputies to
be present and act as such, for preserving the peace, or for any other purpose, at any
election polls within said cities of the first class.?
It shall be the duty of the police officers, constables and deputy-constables now re-
quired by law to be present at the polls to remain within the voting-room, but outside
the guard-rail, while the votes are being counted, and to preserve order therein. No
person except the said peace officers, when necessary for the preservation of the peace
or persons acting by their authority for the same end, shall enter the space within the
guard-rail, or communicate with any election officer in any way after the polls are
closed, and until the counting of the votes has been completed.”
IX. CLosIna OF POLLS—COUNTING OF VOTE—RETURN.
As soon as the election shall be finished, the tickets, list of taxables, one of the lists
of voters, the tally-papers and one of the certificates of the oath or affirmation taken
and subscribed by the inspectors, judges and clerks, shall all be carefully collected and
deposited in one or more of the ballot-boxes, and such box or boxes, being closely
bound round with tape, shall be sealed by the inspectors and the judge of the elec-
tion; and together with the remaining ballot-boxes, shall within one day thereafter be
delivered by one of the inspectors, to the nearest justice of the peace, who shall keep
such boxes containing the tickets and other documents, to answer the call of any
persons or tribunal authorized to try the merits of such election ; and the other list of
voters, tally-papers and certificates shall be inclosed by the said inspectors and judge
in a sealed cover, directed to the prothonotary of the court of common pleas of the
county, and shall by some one of them be delivered into his office, within three days
thereafter, where the same shall be filed.*
As soon as the polls shall close, the officers of election shall proceed to count all the
votes cast for each candidate voted for, and make a full return of the same, in tripli-
cate, with a return-sheet in addition, in all of which the votes received by each candi-
date shall be given, after his or her name, first in words, and again in figures, and
shall be signed by all of said officers and certified by overseers, if any, or if not so
certified, the overseers and any officer refusing to sign or certify, or either of them,
shall write upon each of the returns his or their reaaons for not signing or certifying
them. The vote, as soon as counted, shall also be publicly and fully declared from
the window, to the citizens present, and a brief statement, showing the votes received
by each candidate, shall be made and signed by the election officers, as soon as the
vote is counted, and the same shall be immediately posted up on the door of the elec-
tion house, for information of the public. The triplicate returns shall be inclosed in
envelopes, and be sealed in presence of the officers, and one envelope, with the un-
sealed return-sheet, given to the judge, which shall contain one list of voters, tally-
paper, and oaths of officers, and another of said envelopes shall be given to the
minority inspector. All judges living within twelve miles of the prothonotary’s office,
or within twenty-four miles, if their residence be in a town, village or city upon the line
of a railroad leading to the county seat, shall, before two o'clock post-meridian of the
day after the election, and all other judges shall, before twelve o’clock meridian of
the second day after the election, deliver said return, together with return-sheet, to
the prothonotary of the court of common pleas of the county ; which said return-sheet
1 Act 24 March 1877 é 1. Purd. 747. Quere? 2 A policeman has no business at the polls,
ag to the constitutionality of the act? It is cer- except when specifically required. 34 W.-N. C.
tainly a local law, prescribing the powers and 476,
duties of county officers, in a single county. See 5 Aot 2 July 1839 3 74, Purd. 745.
Const., art. III., 37; and 105 Penn. St. 377.
ELECTIONS. 885
shall be filed, and the day and hour of filing marked thereon, and shall be preserved
by the prothonotary for public inspection.?
Nothing in this act shall require the returns of election of township or borough
officers to be made to the court as directed in this section; but all returns of the eleo-
tion of township and borough officers shall be inclosed in a sealed cover, directed to
the prothonotary of the court of common pleas of the proper county,” and shall, by
some one of them, be delivered into his office, within three days after every such
election, and filed therein.®
After the polls are closed the election officers only shall remain in the voting room
within the guard-rail, and shall there at once proceed to count the votes. Such
counting shall not be adjourned or postposed until it shall have been fully completed.
A record shall first be made of the number of the last ballot cast; the officers in
charge of the voting check list shall, in the presence of the other officers and watchers,
count in « distinct and audible voice the names checked on the said list and announce
the whole number thereof, and the lists of voters, the stubs of ballots used, and all
unused ballots shall then be sealed’ up as required by section twenty-five of this act.
The ballot-box shall then be opened by the inspectors, the ballots taken therefrom
and audibly counted one by one by them, and when the count is completed the whole
number of ballots cast shall be announced, and the counting of the number of votes
received by each person voted for shall then proceed. The judge, in the presence of
the inspectors, shall read aloud the name or names marked or inserted upon each
ballot, and the answers marked thereon to the questions submitted, if any, and the
clerks shall each carefully enter each vote as read, and keep account of the same on
tally-papers prepared for the purpose. It shall be unlawful for either judge or in-
spector, while counting the ballots or the votes thereon, to have in his hand any pen,
pencil or stamp for marking ballots.*
All ballots after being removed from the box shall be kept within the unobstructed
view of those present in the voting room, so that they may be able to see all the
marks on each ballot, but out of their reach until they are placed in the ballot-box as
required by law. A full return shall be made in the manner now provided by law of
all the votes cast, and the total vote, as soon as counted, shall be publicly announced.®
X. BALLOT-BOXES.
The commissioners for the city of Philadelphia shall provide a fire-proof room or
vault in the public buildings of the said city, or some other suitable place, at which
the judge of the elections, after the closing of the polls and the requirements of the
law have been complied with, shall forthwith there deliver to the mayor and recorder
of the city of Philadelphia the said ballot-boxes ; the said room or vault shall not be
accessible to any other person than the mayor and recorder aforesaid, who shall be
present and receive at the said room or vault the ballot-boxes from the return-in-
spectors as aforesaid. The mayor and recorder aforesaid shall not take or open, or
permit to be taken or opened, any ballot-box deposited as aforesaid for the space of
one year after the same has been therein deposited, except when they shall be called
upon by some court or other tribunal authorized to try the merits of such election ;
and after such trial or investigation it shall be the duty of the mayor and recorder
aforesaid to have said box or boxes returned and deposited as aforesaid.
Whenever a place has been or shall be provided by the authorities of any city,
county, township or borough, for the safe keeping of the ballot-boxes, the judge and
1,8 Act 30 January 1874313. Ibid. These +4 Act 10 June 1893 3 28. Purd. 745. The
two and the preceding section, except as tothe legality of the ballots must be determined and
return, are supplied by the act 10 June 1893, 3 received or rejected upon evidence, when the
28, P. L. 419, infra. same are about to be counted. 13 C. C. 609.
2 By act 13 February 1874, 3 2, P. L. 44,such 5 Act 10 June 1803 3 28. Purd. 746,
returns are to be made to the clerk of the court © Act 1 May 1861911. Purd. 746.
of quarter sessions.
25
386 ELECTIONS.
minority inspector shall, after the election shall be finished, and the ballot-box or
boxes containing the tickets, list of voters and other papers have been securely bound
with tape and sealed, and the signatures of the judge and inspectors affixed thereto,
forthwith deliver the same, together with the remaining boxes, to the mayor and re-
corder of such city, or in counties, townships or boroughs, to such person or persons
as the court of common pleas of the proper county may designate, at the place pro-
vided as aforesaid, who shall then deposit the said boxes and keep the same to
answer the call of any court or tribunal authorized to try the merits of such election:
Whenever the election officers of any election district shall require the election boxes
of such district to hold any election which by law they are or shall be required to hold,
they shall keep the same securely in their possession, without opening, until the
morning of such election, and until they shall severally be, sworn or affirmed not to
disclose how any elector shall have voted, and, after being so sworn or affirmed, they
shall open the said boxes and burn and totally destroy all the ballots and other papers
which they shall find therein before proceeding to hold such election.’
XI. Duties OF THE RETURN-JUDGES.
At twelve o'clock on the said second day following any election, the prothonotary of
the court of common pleas shall present the said returns to the said court ; in counties
where there is no resident president judge, the associate judges shall perform the
duties imposed upon the court of common pleas, which shall convene for said purpose ;
the returns presented by the prothonotary shall be opened by said court, and computed
by such of its officers and such sworn assistants as the court shall appoint, in the
presence of the judge or judges of said court, and the returns certified and certificates
of election issued under the seal of the court as is now required to be done by return-
judges; and the vote, as so computed and certified, shall be made a matter of record
in said court. The sessions of the said court shall be open to the public.”
And in case the return of any election district shall be missing, when the returns
are presented, or in case of complaint of a qualified elector, under oath, charging pal-
pable fraud or mistake, and particularly specifying the alleged fraud or mistake, or
where fraud or mistake is apparent on the return, the court shall examine the return,
and if, in the judgment of the court, it shall be necessary to a just return, said court
shall issue summary process against the election officers and overseers, if any, of the
election district complained of, to bring them forthwith into court, with all election
papers in their possession ;* and if palpable mistake or fraud shall be discovered, it
shall, upon such hearing as may be deemed necessary to enlighten the court, be cor-
rected by the court, and so certified; but all allegations-of palpable fraud or mistake
shall be decided by the said court, within three days after the day the returns are
brought into court for computation ; and the said inquiry shall be directed only to pal-
pable fraud or mistake, and shall not be deemed a judicial adjudication to conclude
any contest now or hereafter to be provided by law. And the other of said triplicate
returns shall be placed in the box and sealed up with the ballots.
In counties where there are three or more judges of said court learned in the law,
at least two judges shall sit to compute and certify returns, uhless unavoidably pre-
vented. If any of the said judges shall himself be a candidate for any office at an
election, he shall not sit with the court, or act in counting the returns of such election,
and in such cases, the other judges, if any, shall act; and if, in any county, there
1 Aet 30 January 1874 2 13. Purd. 746. judicial power. 1 Brewst. 67,77. 74 Penn. St.
2Tfa majority of the votes have been cast for
a disqualified person, the one who received the
next highest number is not to be returned as
elected. 56 Penn. St. 270, And see Bright.
Elect. Cas. 50. Return-judges are mere minis-
terial officers; it is their duty simply to cast up
the votes, and award the certificate to the per-
son having the highest number; they have no
479. And see Bright. Elect. Cas. 300-6. 11
Abb. Pr. (N. S.) 203. In case of an election to
fill a vacancy, for which no proclamation has
been made by the sheriff, the judges will com-
pute the . ste, but will not give a certifizate of
election. 14 W. N.C. 208, 209.
5 See 6 Luz. L. Reg. 216,
ELECTIONS. 387
shall be no judge qualified to hold the said court, under the provisions of this act,
present and able to act, then, and in every such case, the register of wills, the sheriff,
and the county commissioners of the proper county, shall be and constitute a board,
who, or a majority of whom, shal) have and exercise all the powers and perform all
the duties vested in, or required to be performed by the court of common pleas of
such county, by and under the provisions of this section; but none of the said officers
shall act as a member of such board, when himself a candidate for any office at the
election, the returns of which the said board is required to count under the provisions
of this section. The returns required by this act to be presented by the prothonotary
of the courts of common pleas of the counties of Philade[{phia and Allegheny, re-
spectively, shall be presented to such three or more of the judges of the several courts
of common pleas of said counties, respectively, as the judges of said courts, or a
majority of them, may designate to perform the duty of receiving, computing and
certifying said returns. When two or more counties are connected for the election of
any officer, the courts of such counties shall each appoint a return-judge, to meet at
such time and place as required by law, to compute and certify the vote of such dis-
trict. All officers provided for by this act shall be compensated as like officers are paid
by existing laws.
The clerks shall, thereupon, in presence of the judges, make out returns in the
manner hereinafter directed, which shall be signed by all the judges present, and
attested by said clerks; and it shall not be lawful for said judges or clerks, in
casting up the votes which shall appear to have been given, as shown by the certifi-
cates under the 76th and 77th sections of this act, to omit or reject any part thereof,
except where, in the opinion of said judges, such certificate is so defective as to
prevent the same from being understood and computed in adding together the
number of votes; in which case, it shall be the duty of said clerks to make outa
true and exact copy of said paper or certificate, to be signed by said judges, and
attested by said clerks, and attached to, and transmitted with said return (where
the same is directed to be transmitted) to the secretary of the commonwealth, and
the original paper shall be deposited in the prothonotary’s office, and by said
officer copied and transmitted, with the return of said election, to the secretary as
aforesaid.
I. Duplicate returns of all the votes given for every person and persons, who
shall have been voted for, for any office or station, which the electors of the county
are entitled to choose of themselves, unconnected, with any other county or dis-
trict.
II. Like returns of all the votes given in the county, for every person voted for as
governor.
III. Triplicate returns of all the votes given for any persons voted for in the
county, as electors of president and vice-president of the United States.’
When the returns shall be completed, the president of the board of judges
aforesaid shall forthwith lodge one of each of such returns in the office of the
prothonotary of the court of common pleas of the county; and in case of an
election of electors for president and vice-president of the United States, one other
of the returns in the same office; and the other duplicates shall be transmitted as
follows, viz. :
I. In the case of a governor, the remaining duplicate shall-be inclosed in an
envelope, directed to the speaker of the senate, and indorsed according to the fact,
which having been sealed, shall be inclosed in another envelope, sealed and directed
to the secretary of the commonwealth; and the same shall forthwith be placed, by
the said president, in the nearest post-office.
II. In case of electors of president and vice-president of the United States, and of
members of the house of representatives of the United States, and of county officers
1 Act 30 January 1874213. Purd. 749-50. 2 Act 2 July 1839 379. Purd. 750.
388 ELECTIONS
to be commissioned by the governor, the remaining duplicate shall be inclosed in an
envelope, sealed and directed to the secretary of the commonwealth, and in like
manner placed, by the said president, in the nearest post-office.
III. In ease of the election of a senator or senators of this commonwealth, the
same shall be inclosed in an envelope, sealed and directed ‘‘ To the Senate of Penn-
sylvania ;’’ and in case of the election of a member or members of the house of
representatives of this commonwealth, the same shall, in like manner, be inclosed in
an envelope, sealed and directed ‘‘To the House of Representatives of Pennsylva-
nia;’’ and each of said returns shall be inclosed in an envelope, and ditected to the
secretary of the commonwealth, and in like manner placed, by said president, in the
nearest post-office.’
When two or more counties shall compose a district for the choice of a member or
members of the senate of this commonwealth, or of the house of representatives of
the United States, or of this commonwealth, the judges of the election, in each
county, having met as aforesaid, the clerks shall make out a fair statement of all the
votes which shall have been given at such election, within the county, for every
person voted for, as such member or members, which shall be signed by said judges,
and attested by the clerks; and one of the said judges shall take charge of such
certificate, and shall produce the same at a meeting of one judge from each county,
at such place, in such district, as is or may be appointed by law for the purpose;
which meeting shall be held on the seventh day after the election.’
The judges of the several counties having met as aforesaid, shall cast up the several
county returns, and make duplicate returns of all the votes given for such office, in
said district, and of the name of the person or persons elected, and one of said re-
turns for each office, shall be deposited in the office of the prothonotary of the court
of common pleas of the county in which they shall meet, and the other shall be, by
said judges, deposited in the nearest post-office, sealed and directed to the secretary
of the commonwealth, in the manner directed in parts two and three of the 80th sec-
tion of this act.?
It shall also be the duty of the return-judges, in every case, to transmit to each of
the persons elected to serve in congress, or in the senate, or in the house of repre-
sentatives of this commonwealth, a certificate of his election, within five days after
the day of making up such return.*
In cases of election of county commissioners and county auditors, one copy of the
return of election shall be inclosed in an envelope, sealed and directed ‘‘ to the com-
missioners ’’ of the proper county.®
XII. TowNsHIP ELECTIONS.
The constable or constables of every township within this commonwealth, shall
give public notice of the township elections, by ten or more printed or written
advertisements, affixed at as many of the most public places therein, at least ten days
before the election, and in every such advertisement they shall enumerate, designate
and give notice as sheriffs of counties in cases of general elections are directed, by
the Ist and 2d divisions of the 13th section of the act to which this is a supple-
ment; and in case of the reglect, refusal, death or absence of the aforesaid constable
or constables, the duties herein enjoined on them shall be performed by the super-
visors or assessor of the proper township, but said supervisors or assessor of the
proper township shall not be required to give more than five days’ notice; and said
elections shall be held and conducted under the regulations, not inconsistent here-
with, prescribed in the aforesaid act; but nothing in this act, or in the act to
1 Act 2 July 1839 3 80. Purd. 750. “Thid. 2 83. A mandamus will lie, to compel
2 Ibid. 2 81. them todo so. 74 Penn. St, 479.
® Ibid. 3 82. 5 Act 13 June 1840 3 8. Purd. 751.
ELECTIONS. 389
which this is a supplement contained, shall be construed to prohibit a judge,
inspector or clerk of election from being voted for to fill any township office, or
render either or any of them ineligible to hold the same.
The election for the said township officers shall be held during the same hours,
and by the persons appointed to hold the election of inspectors and assessors, on the
third “Tuesday of February” of every year?
It shall be the duty of the said inspectors and judge, to make out a certificate
of the election of each township officer aforesaid, which shall be signed by them
and delivered to the constable of the proper ward, district or township ; and by him
rr to the said officer or left at his usual place of abode within six days there-
after.
The clerk of the court of quarter sessions of every county within this common-
wealth shall, within fifteen days after the township elections, in each year, are
returned into his office, (to) make out, certify and deliver, under his hand and seal
of office, to the commissioners of his proper county, a list of the names of the per-
sons elected to the offices of assessor and assistant assessors, and the names of the
wards, townships, incorporated districts and boroughs, within their respective
counties, for which they were respectively elected; and shall be allowed there-
for the usual fees for equal or similar services, to be paid out of the county
treasury.*
Every judge as aforesaid shall be allowed six cents per mile, for each mile
necessarily travelled in delivering the return of the township election of his proper
township, to the clerk of the court of quarter sessions ; said mileage, to be computed
circular, and paid out of the county treasury, on orders drawn by the commissioners
in the usual manner: Provided, That no compensation shall be paid where the
return is not delivered within the time prescribed by law; and no daily pay shall
be allowed for making returns of township elections
Constables, supervisors or assessors, as the case may be, of any ward, township,
incorporated district or borough, shall be allowed and paid out of the county
treasury, two dollars for advertising ward, township, district and borough elections ;
said constables shall also be allowed and paid, as aforesaid, twenty cents for deliver-
ing to each township officer a certificate of his election, as directed by this act, and
the act to which this is a supplement.®
When any new township shall be erected in any county of this commonwealth, it
shall be lawful for the court of quarter sessions of the proper county to authorize
the citizens of said new township to hold an election for justices of the peace, and
all other township officers, upon such notice as the court may direct.’
Whenever it shall become necessary for the citizens of any township in any of
the counties of this commonwealth, which has been or shall be divided in any way
in forming any election district or districts, to elect justices of the peace, judges and
inspectors of elections, assessors, constables, school directors or other township
officers, in pursuance of any act or acts of assembly, the qualified voters of such
township shall meet at the usual place of holding their annual township elections
respectively, and shall then and there proceed to elect such officers in the manner
now provided for by law, and the returns of such elections shall be made out in the
same manner as is now provided for by the laws of this commonwealth; and such
township election so held in any township which may be divided as aforesaid, shall
be held and conducted only by the judge, inspectors and clerks residing in the dis-
trict where the place of holding the township election is or may be located, any law
to the contrary notwithstanding: Provided, That whenever a vacancy happens by
death, resignation, removal or otherwise, then the judge or inspector residing in the
township and district nearest to the place of holding the township election shall
hold and conduct the same.®
It shall be the duty of the judge and inspectors holding and conducting such
1 Act 13 June 1840 32. Purd. 378,760. Aclerk 5 Act 13 June 1840310. Purd. 760.
of election is eligible to any township office. 3 6 Ibid. 3 11.
Luz. L. Reg. 130. 7 Act 5 April 1849 2 32. Ibid.
2 Act 2 July 1839 353. Purd. 760. Const.of & Act 7 March 1840 3°27. Ibid. 761. See act
1874, art. VIII. 2 3. 18 May 1876, Ibid. 647, as to the appointment of
3 Act 2 July 1839 9 54. Ibid. election officers where a township is divided into
Act 13 June 1810 39. Ibid. two or more election districts.
390 ELECTIONS.
township election to keep as many separate boxes and separate lists of voters for
judges and inspectors of elections as there are election districts or parts of election
districts in such township respectively, in which they shall deposit the votes of the
citizens residing within the limits of such district, or parts of districts, for judges
and inspectors of the general elections in their particular districts, and the returns
thereof shall be made out and certified in conformity with the provisions of the
act of the 2d July, Anno Domini 1839, entitled “an act relating to the elections
of this commonwealth ;” and in cases where part only of the township forms, in
connection with other parts of other townships, a general election district, the judge
holding such township election shall meet the judge or judges from the other town-
ship or townships, forming part of such general election district, at the place of
holding the general election, and the said judges shall then and there proceed to
make out a general return from their respective returns, which shall be signed,
certified and returned with their several returns, in like manner as is now provided
for by law.?
The judge, inspectors and clerks of each election district of any borough, ward
or township in the counties of this commonwealth, which shall have been divided
by the court into separate election districts, under the provisions of the act of
April 20th, 1854, shall make out a complete return of all the votes given at any
borough, ward or township election, designating the number of votes each person
received; and the judge and inspectors shall appoint one of their number for
return-judge, to meet the other return-judge or judges of the said borough, ward
or township in said county, at the oldest election place, on the third day after any
borough, ward or township election, and then add together the number of votes
given for each person voted for, and make out the returns, as the nature of the
election may require, complying in all respects with the provisions of existing elec-
tion laws; and after the performance of said duties, appoint one of their number,
by consent or lot, to deliver the full returns to the court of quarter sessions of said
county, in the same manner now provided by law for making township returns:
Provided, The provisions of this act shall not affect any existing election law relative
to the city of Philadelphia, city of Pittsburgh, and Erie.?
XIIl. Primary ELECTIONS.
It shall be lawful and it is hereby made the duties of the judges, inspectors and
clerks or other officers of the primary elections, meetings or caucuses held for the
purpose of nominating candidates for state, city and county offices within the com-
monwealth of Pennsylvania, before entering upon the discharge of their duties,
severally to take and subscribe to an oath or affirmation in the presence of each
other, in form as follows, namely : “ J, (A. B.) do that I will, as judge, inspector
or clerk (as the case may be), at the enswing election, impartially and Saithfully
perform my duties, in accordance with the laws and constitution of the commonwealth
of Pennsylvania, and in accordance with the rules and regulations adopted by the
party, of the county of , for the government of the said primary elections,
meetings or caucus, to the best of my judgment and abilities :’’ The oath or affirmation
shall be first administered to the judge by one of the inspectors, then the judge so
qualified shall administer the oath or affirmation to the inspectors and clerks, and
may administer the oath to any elector offering to vote, as to his qualifications to
vote, at such election? ;
If any judge, inspector, clerk or other officer of a primary election, as aforesaid,
shall ‘presume to act in such capacity, before the taking and subscribing to the oath
or affirmation required by this act, he shall, on conviction, be fined, not exceeding
two hundred dollars; and if any judge, inspector, clerk or other officer, when in
the discharge of his duties as such, shall wilfully disregard or violate the provisions
of any rule, duly made by the said party, of county, for the government of
the primary elections of the party, he shall, on conviction, be fined not exceeding
two hundred dollars; and if any judge or inspector of a primary election as afore-
said, shall knowingly reject the vote of any person entitled to vote under the rules of
the said party, or shall knowingly receive the vote of any person or persons
1 Act 7 March 1840 3 28. Purd. 761. ® Act 29 June 188131. P
2 Act 2 April 1860 21. eee ae
ELECTIONS. 391
not qualified 1s aforesaid, shall, on conviction, be fined not exceeding two hundred dol-
lars; and if any judge, inspector, clerk or other officer of a primary election, as afore-
said, shall be guilty of any wilful fraud in the discharge of his duties, by destroying
or defacing ballots, adding ballots to the poll, other than those lawfully voted, by
stuffing the ballot-box, by false counting, by making false returns, or by any act or
thing whatsoever, the person so offending shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor,
and upon conviction, shall be fined not exceeding five hundred dollars, or imprisoned
not exceeding one year, or both, or either, at the discretion of the court. All acts
or parts of acts of assembly inconsistent with this act are hereby repealed, except in
counties or cities where special acts are in force for the same purpose: Provided,
That the provisions of this act shall entail no expense to the counties or cities
XIV. CoNnTESTED ELECTIONS.
The several classes of elections which may be contested in this commonwealth
are hereby distinguished and designated as follows, to wit:
I. The governor and lieutenant-governor of the commonwealth.
II. Electors of president and vice-president of the United States, and all
officers of this commonwealth (except governor and lieutenant-governor), who
now are or hereafter shall be required to be elected by the qualified voters of the
state at large.
III. The judges of the several courts of record, to be learned in the law, other
than judges of the supreme court.
IV. All other officers (excepting members of the general assembly), whether
elected by the qualified voters of counties, cities, townships, boroughs, wards,
schoo] districts or any other division of the state.?
Cases of the fourth class shall be tried and determined by the court of quarter
sessions of the peace of the county in which the election contested shall be held.®
The proper court or judge shall have power to compel the attendance of any
election officer, or other person, as a witness, and may also compel the production
of all books, papers, tally-lists, returns of election, other documentary or record
evidence, at discretion, for use on the trial, and may issue subpenas and attach-
ments, for these purposes, as in other cases of proceedings in the courts of this
commonwealth ; and all such books, papers, documents, ballots, boxes and records
shall be returned to the proper custody.‘ Certified copies of all election papers,
assessments, registers of votes and records, duly authenticated by the person hav-
ing custody thereof, shall be competent evidence, and prim@ facie proof of their
contents ; but the party, against whom the same shall be produced, shall have the
right to compel the attendance of the person who certifies them, for cross-exam-
ination. Examiners, to take and report evidence, may be appointed; and reason-
able notice of the time and place of taking the same shall be prescribed by the
court or judge, and served upon the opposite party.
‘Witnesses and officers shall be paid the same fees as are now, or hereafter shall
be, fixed by law for similar services, in the county in which the trial shall be held’
If the court or judge shall decide that the complaint is without probable cause,
the petitioners, and every of them, shall be jointly and severally liable for all the
costs ; and the same may be collected as debts of like amount are by law collectible,
or payment thereof may be enforced by attachment. In contested elections of
electors of president and vice-president, and state officers whose jurisdiction extends
over the state, in which the court or judge shall not decide that the complaint is
without probable cause, the commonwealth shall be liable for all costs; and the
same shall be paid by the state treasurer, out of any moneys-not otherwise appro-
priated, on bills certified to be correct by the proper court or judge, upon examina-
tion and approval of the auditor-general.? In contested elections of president or
1 Act 29 June 188132. Purd. 761. See the to open the ballot boxes will not be made, until
act 8 June 1881, Purd. 481, as to bribery at the evidence is closed, and the illegality of the
primary elections. votes proven, nor unless the declared result of
7 Act 19 May 187431. Purd. 763. the election will be thereby changed. 12 Phila.
3Tbid. 316. Purd. 767. 570.
‘The court may order a bill of particulars. 5 6 See 12 Phila. 571.
W.N. 0.122. And see 1 Kulp 157, ™See 94 Penn. St. 381; and act 8 May 1876.
5 Act 19 May 1874 2 8. Purd. 767. Anorder Purd. 769.
392 ELECTIONS.
additional law judges, senators, and members of the house of representatives and
of county, borough, township or municipal officers, in which the court or judge
shall not decide that the complaint is without probable cause, the proper district,
county, city, township, borough, ward, school district or municipality, shall be liable
to pay all costs; and the same shall be promptly paid by the proper authorities,
upon the order of the court or judge trying the case. ;
The proper court or judge shall have power to appoint phonographic reporters,
if necessary, to take the testimony, and may order printing of such matters as may be
necessary during the trial; and all bills for such reports and printing, certified
to be reasonable and correct by the court or judge, shall be a part of the costs, and
collectible as other costs in the case: Provided, That all printing required in cases
of the second and third classes, shall be done by the state printer, at contract
prices ; and in all other cases, the prices to be paid for such reporting and printing,
shall be fixed in the order providing therefor, and no more than the amount thus
fixed shall be paid in any case.?
No judge shall sit on the trial of a case in which he shall be a party. In any
case where, by reason of incompetency or any disability to act, there shall be no
law judge of the district in which any contest shall arise present, and able as well
as qualified to act, the judge learned in the law, residing nearest the court-house
of the county in which, by the provisions of this act, the trial in any such case is
required to be had, except in cases otherwise provided in this act, shall preside on
the trial, and shall have and exercise all the powers and authority, and discharge
all the duties, granted to or imposed upon the regular judges of the said courts, in
cases wherein they are qualified and required to act by the provisions of this law.
Any law judge, who is hereby authorized to preside in any such case, and an
president or other judge, learned in the law, of the proper court, shall have full
power to hold any of the said courts, by this act required to try any such contested
election case, without the assistance of the associate justices, or either of them, of
such courts, not learned in the law. And all of the said courts and judges, hereby
required to try any contested election case, shall have plenary power to make, issue
and enforce all necessary orders, rules, process and decrees, for a full and proper
understanding and final determination and enforcement of the decision of every
such case, according to the course of practice in similar cases, under the laws of
this commonwealth, or which may be necessary and proper to carry out the pro-
visions of this act.’
The commencement of proceedings, in every case, shall be by petition,* which
shall be made and filed, as herein required, within thirty days after the day of
election ;° the petition shall concisely set forth the cause of complaint, showing
wherein it is claimed the election is undue or illegal,® and after filing, shall not be
amended, unless such amendment shall be allowed by the proper court or judge,
after notice to the other party and hearing ;’ and if allowed, reasonable time shall
be given to answer. In cases of the second class, the petition shall be signed by at
least one hundred qualified electors* who voted at the election contested ; in cases
1 Act 19 May 1874 2 9. Purd. 767.
2 Ibid. 2 10.
8 Thid. 5 17.
# To confer jurisdiction, under this act, all its
requisites must be strictly complied with. 3 W.
N. C. 165. 16 Ibid. 223. A contest involving
the election of different persons to difforent offices
cannot be raised by a single petition. 2 Leg.
Chron. 307.
5 Seo 6 W. N. C. 460. If filed in due time,
a commission cannot issue, pending the contest.
13 W. N.C. 170.
6 A petition will not be dismissed, merely
because it does not aver in express terms, that the
sontestant received the larger number of votes, if
such fact be apparent, by an examination of the
other statements therein. 12 Phila. 575. It need
not set forth the names or the disqualifications of
the illegal voters. 1 Leg. Ree. R. 105. A petition
contesting an election, on the ground that there
was no vacancy in the office, need not aver that
the return is not correct. 2 Pears. 456. If it
rely upon a missing return, it must show a duo
application to the court, within three days, for
summary process against the election officers. 25
Pitts. L.J.47. Repugnant specifications in the
petition will be stricken out, 11 Phila. 393.
7 See 11 Phila. 383. 2 Pears. 456. 10 Phila.
579. 2 Leg. Reo. R. 145. 1 Ibid. 105.
8 All tho petitioners must be qualified clectors,
11 Phila. 403; and this must bo averred in the
petition. Ibid. 402. Tho omission of such aver-
ment is a fatal defect of jurisdiction; and cannot
be cured by an amendment, after the lapse of
thirty days from the election. 3 W.N. C. 165.
And if one of the signers be subsequently ascer-
tained not to be a qualified elector, the court can-
not permit an amendment, by adding the name
of another elector, with the appropriate vouchers.
16 W. N. C. 223. One of the signers will not be
arg subsequently to withdraw his signature
ey the petition, 14 Ibid. 303. And see 1 Phila.
ELECTIONS. 393
of the third class, by at least fifty such electors; and in cases of the fourth class,
by at least twenty-five ; and shall be verified by at least five of the petitioners, by
affidavit taken and subscribed before some person authorized by the laws of this
commonwealth to administer oaths, setting forth that they verily believe the facts
stated therein are true, that according to the best of their knowledge and belief,
the election was undue or illegal, and the return thereof not correct, and that the
petition to contest the same is made in good faith.! The petition shall be presented
to the court or law judge having jurisdiction, except where otherwise provided in
this act; and, if it shall be adjudged sufficient it shall be filed of record in the
proper court, and thereupon a time shall be fixed for hearing. Notice of the filing
of the petition, with a copy thereof, shall be served upon the person whose right
of office shall be contested, together with a rule to answer at the time fixed for
hearing ;? which notice, copy and rule shall be served such length of time before
the day fixed for hearing, as the said court or judge shall require, not exceeding
forty days, in cases of the second and third classes, and in all other cases, not
exceeding thirty days.°
In trials of contested elections, and in all proceedings for the investigation of
elections, no person shall be permitted to withhold his testimony, upon the ground
that he may criminate himself, or subject him to public infamy ; but such testimony
shall not afterwards be used against him in any judicial proceeding, except for
perjury in giving such testimony.*
Whenever, in contested elections of president or additional law judges, senators,
and members of the house of representatives, and of county, borough, township or
municipal officers, under the provisions of the ninth section of an act, entitled
‘“‘an act designating the several classes of contested elections in this commonwealth
and providing for the trial thereof,’ approved the 19th of May, Anno Domini 1874,
wherein it is provided that in contested elections of presidents or additional law
judges, senators, and members of the house of representatives, and of county,
borough, township or municipal officers, in which the court or judges shall not
decide that the complaint is without probable cause, the proper district, county,
city, township, borough, ward, school-district, or municipality shall be liable to pay
all costs, and the same shall be promptly paid by the proper authorities and upon
the order of the court or judge trying the case—if any court or judge shall have
heretofore decided, or shall hereafter decide, that the complaint was not, or is not,
without probable cause, the said court or judge is hereby authorized, and shall
apportion all the costs among the proper districts, counties, cities, townships,
boroughs, wards, school-districts or municipalities of the whole district in which
contest is had, in such way as said court or judge shall think just; and to compel
by order the payment of such amounts so apportioned to each by the properly con-
stituted authorities of each other of the proper districts, counties, cities, townships,
boroughs, wards, school-districts or municipalities, as the payment of debts by the
same can now be enforced.®
Prom and after the passage of this act, whenever it shall appear by the returns of
election laid before the governor, by the secretary of the commonwealth, as now re-
quired by law, that any person has been duly elected to the office of prothonotary,
clerk of the courts, recorder of deeds or register of wills, judge, or any other officer re-
ceiving a commission from the governor, in any of the several counties of this com-
monwealth, it shall be the duty of the governor to issue a commission to such person,
notwithstanding that the election of such person to any or either of said offices may be
contested, in the manner now provided by law: Provided, That whenever it shall
appear by the decision of the proper tribunal having jurisdiction of said contested
election, that the person to whom said commission shall have issued, has not been
legally elected to the office for which he has been commissioned, then a commission
shall issue to the person who shall appear legally elected to said office ; the issuing of
which commission shall nullify and make void the commission already issued, and all
power and authority under said commission first issued shall thereupon cease and de-
1 All the affiants must be duly qualified elec- 2 Service of a copy of the petition is not a pre-
tors. 11 Phila. 400. The jurat should show by requisite|to the jurisdiction; it must be served,
whom the oath was made; and must bein the however, before the hearing. 11 Phila. 382.
form prescribed by law. 13 L. Bar. 183. But 8 Act 19 May 1874318. Purd. 768.
a formal objection to the affidavit cannot be 4 Ibid. 3 19
made, after the testimony has beentaken, and 5 Act 8 May 187631. Ibid.
tha avaminawa ranart filad 19 Phila A217.
394 ELECTIONS.
termine: Provided further, That this act shall not in any manner affect any contest
now pending.? <
Whenever the election of any officer shall hereafter be contested before the court
of common pleas of the city and county of Philadelphia, the court shall, upon the
application of any citizen, appoint a receiver, to take, receive and hold, during said
contested election; and until the final determination thereof, all the fees, perquisites
and emoluments of the office so contested ; and the said court shall require security to
be entered by him, in such sums as they shall deem proper, conditioned for the faith-
ful performance of all orders and decrees of said court; and they may, at any time,
order additional security to be entered, or remove said receiver, and from time to time,
appoint another receiver, as may be necessary.”
Upon the final determination of said contested election, or sooner, if thereto re-
quired by said court, the receiver or receivers so appointed, shall file his or their ac-
counts, and the same may be examined and settled by said court, or be referred to an
auditor or master, for that purpose; and the amount ascertained to be in the hands of
said receiver or receivers, shall, after deducting such charges as may be allowed by
said court, be paid over to the person or persons, and in the proportion said court
shall decree: Provided, That any (person) aggrieved by the final decree upon said
receiver’s account, may appeal therefrom, as in other equity proceedings.’
The said court shall, for the purpose of carrying this act into execution, have all
the power of a court of equity, in cases where receivers are appointed by said courts,
and may in their discretion, order investments to be made of any funds in the hands
of said receiver or receivers, in the debt of the United States, of this state, or of the
city of Philadelphia.*
The said court of common pleas for the city and county of Philadelphia shall have
power, whenever necessary for the determination of the same, to issue commissions to
places outside of the state, and to appoint an examiner or examiners to take testimony
within the state, and to make all needful rules relative to the examination of wit-
nesses, the closing of the testimony and other matters, as in equity proceedings; and
the examiner and examiners, so appointed, shall have power to issue subpoenas, and
to compel the attendance of witnesses by attachments, and upon failure of any witness
to testify, as required by said examiner or examiners, the court may attach for con-
tempt, asin other cases.®
The said court of common pleas of the city and county of Philadelphia may, upon
final decree, enter a judgment for costs, either in whole or part, against the county,
the petitioners or the respondent; or they may apportion the said costs, in equal or
unequal parts, between the county, the petitioners and the respondent, as to them
may seem just.®
The final decrees of the said court, upon contested elections, may be enforced by in-
junction, attachment and sequestration ; and their judgments as to costs may be en-
forced, if against the county, by mandamus execution, and if against parties, by
execution and attachment.’
Whenever in any contested election the tribunal trying the case shall decide that
the ballots used in one or more election districts were, by reason of the omission,
addition, misplacing, misspelling or misstatement of one or-.more titles of offices, or
names of candidates, or parties or policies represented by them, so defective as to the
office in contest as to be calculated to mislead the voters in regard to any of the ean-
didates nominated for the said office, and that the defective condition of the said
ballots may have affected the result of the entire election for the said office, the said
tribunal shall declare the election to be invalid as regards the said office, and shall
report their decision to the governor of the commonwealth.
The governor, on receiving the report of the said decision, shall without delay cause
a writ or writs of election for the office in contest to issue, and appoint a day within
four weeks from the date of the writ for the holding of a new election, to be held
according to the provisions of this act for the office in contest.®
XV. WaGErRs ON ELECTIONS. +
If any person or persons shall make any bet or wager upon the result of any election
1 Act 26 April 1889, Purd. 769, 8 Ibid. 3 4.
2 Act 10 April 186791. Ibid. 6 Ibid. 3 5.
8 Act 10 April 1867 32. Purd. 770. 7 Ibid. 3 6. *
4Tbid. 2 3. ® Act 10 June 1893 3 29. Purd. 770.
ELECTIONS, 8395
within this commonwealth, or shall offer to make any such bet or wager, either by
verbal proclamation thereof, or, by any written or printed advertisement, challenge
or invite any person or persons to make such bet or wager, upon conviction thereof,
he or they shall forfeit and pay three times the amount so bet or offered to be bet.!
It shall be the duty of every judge, sheriff, mayor, alderman, justice of the peace
or constable, knowing of any person having offended against the provisions of the
115th section of this act, to commence proceedings against the person so offending ;
and it shall be the duty of the grand juries of the respective counties within this com-
monwealth to make a presentment of all such offences coming within their knowledge.?
It shall be the duty of the inspectors and judge of the election to reject the votes of
all persons, they, or any of them, shall know, or who shall be proven before them,
to have made, or who are in any manner interested in any bet or wager on the
result of said election; and on the request of any qualified elector, said inspectors and
judge shall receive proof to show the person so offering to vote has or has not made
any such bet or wager, or is or is not interested therein.®
It shall be the duty of the several constituted authorities having care and charge of
the poor in the respective counties, districts and townships of this commonwealth,
knowing or being informed, under oath, of any person or persons having made any
bet or wager of any land, goods, money or thing of value, on the result of any election
within this commowealth, or deposited the same in the hands of any person within
their respective counties, districts or townships, to bring suit in the name of the com-
monwealth of Pennsylvania, for the use of the poor of such county, district or town-
ship, against such depositee or stakeholder, where said bet is deposited in the hands
of a third person; or against the party winning said bet, when the same is not so de-
posited, for the recovery of the amount so bet; and if on the trial it shall be made
appear, that said lands, goods, money or thing of value was bet on the result of any
election within this commonwealth, said guardians, directors or overseers of the poor
shall be entitled to recover the amount or value thereof, for the use of the poor, from
said stakeholder, or person winning said: bet where there is no stakeholder: Provided,
said suit is brought within two years from time of making said bet. And the stake-
holder is hereby prohibited, during said time, to pay over the amount so bet to either
of the parties, and shall be liable for the same, whether such bet is paid over or de-
livered to the parties, or either of them, or not, and the party winning shall in like
manner be liable to the payment of the whole amount so bet, where the same is re-
ceived by him. And said bet, or the value thereof, may be recovered as debts of like
amount are by law recoverable; and if said guardians, directors or overseers of the
poor shall neglect or refuse to bring such suit, they shall be guilty of a misdemeanor
in office, and on conviction, shall be fined in any sum not less than the amount so bet,
nor more than double the amount.®
Wagering or betting on the event of an election, held under the constitution or laws
of the United States, or the constitution or laws of this commonwealth, are hereby
prohibited, and all contracts or promises founded thereon are declared to be entirely
null and void.*
6 Act 24 March 1817 31. Purd. 734. The act
1Act 2 July 1839 3 115. Purd. 734. For
form of indictment, see 8 W. 212. A bet on the
result of an election in another state is not
within the penal provisions of this act. 3 Pitts.
28. Nor is a wager on the result of a primary
election. 17 W. N.C. 164.
? Act 2 July 1839 3116. Purd. 734.
’Tbid. 2117. It seems, that this section is in
violation of the constitution. 59 Penn. St. 109,
112. It was so decided by Allison, P. J., in the
common pleas of Philadelphia, in 2 Chest. Co.
R. 355. So, an act which provided that an
elector who had removed from his district,
within ten days of the election, might vote in
the district’ from which he had removed, was
held to be unconstitutional. 1 Brewst. 103.
‘ This is a condition not a limitation; if the
directors of the poor do not sue within two
years, the losing party may recover back his de-
posit from the stakeholder. 53 Penn. St. 138.
But the record must show that the two years
have expired. 26 Pitts. L. J. 85,
5 Aot 2 July 1839 3118. Purd. 734.
was intended to avoid all bets, paid or unpaid,
and to suppress anything connected with the
subject : it cannot, therefore be eluded by an ap-
pended agreement which would give to an actual
wager the similitude of something else. 7 W.
343. Nor can ingenuity invent any mode of
evidencing such a contract, so that it can be en-
forced by law. 7 W. 294, Money deposited in
the hands of a stakeholder cannot be recovered
back, in a joint action by the contributors. 3 W.
& 8.405. 2 Clark 128. And if paid to the win-
ner, a creditor of the loser cannot recover it back
by attachment. 6 W. &8S.485. Money lent in
New Jersey, to be bet on the presidential elec-
tion, may be recovered in Pennsylvania, in the
absence of any proof that betting on election is
against the law of New Jersey. 14 Penn. St. 18.
A wager as to who will be the president of the
United States, is a wager upon the event of an
election. 3 Leg. & Ins. R. 18. See Bright. Elect.
Cas. 728-37. And such bet is illegal, though made
after the closing of the polls. 1 Chest. Co. R. 25.
396 ELECTIONS.
XVI. PENALTIES FOR MISCONDUCT.”
If the constables or supervisors of any township, ward or district, shall neglect or re-
fuse to perform the duties herein required of him or them, they shall respectively, on
conviction, be fined in any sum not less than fifty, nor more than one hundred dollars.”
If any person elected to serve as inspector or judge as aforesaid, and having received
due notice thereof, shall neglect or without good cause, refuse to attend on the day of
election at the time appointed by law, he shall in every such case forfeit the sum of
twenty dollars.*
If any inspector, judge or clerk, as aforesaid, shall neglect or refuse to take upon
himself the duties of such office, he shall forfeit and pay the sum of fifty dollars; or,
having entered upon the same, shall afterwards neglect or refuse to perform the
duties thereof, according to law, he shall forfeit and pay the sum of one hundred
dollars for every such offence.* ; :
If any inspector, judge or clerk of an election, shall presume to act in such capacity,
before taking and subscribing the oath required by this act, he shall, on conviction, be
finedsin any sum not less than fifty, nor more than two hundred dollars.°
If any election officer or assessor of poll taxes shall become intoxicated during any
of the time in which he shall be engaged in the performance of his duties, he shall, on
conviction, be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and be sentenced to an imprisonment
of thirty days, and to pay a fine of twenty dollars and the cost of prosecution, both or
either, at the discretion of the court.®
Tf any inspector, judge or clerk,” as aforesaid, shall be convicted of any wilful fraud
in the discharge of his duties, as aforesaid, he shall undergo an imprisonment for any
term not less than three, nor more than twelve months, and be fined in any sum not
less than one hundred dollars, nor more than five hundred dollars, and shall be, for
seven years thereafter, disabled from holding any office of honor, trust or profit in this
commonwealth, and shall moreover be disabled, for the term aforesaid, from giving
his vote at any general or special election within this commonwealth.®
Tf any inspector or judge of an election shall knowingly reject the vote of any quali-
fied citizen, or knowingly receive the vote of any person not qualified, or conceal from
his fellow-officers any fact in the knowledge of which such vote should by law be re-
ceived or rejected, each of the persons so offending, shall, on conviction, be punished
in the manuer prescribed in the 107th section of this act.?
If any such inspector or judge shall receive the vote of any person whose name
shall not be returned on the list furnished by the commissioners or assessor, without
first requiring the evidence directed in this act, the person so offending shall, on con-
viction, be fined in any sum not less than fifty, nor more than two hundred dollars.”
If any judge of an election, inspector, clerk or other persons, before the poll shall be
closed, shall unfold, open or pry into any ticket, with a design to discover the name
of any candidate therein, every person so offending shall, on conviction, be fined in
any sum not less than fifty, nor more than one hundred dollars, and imprisoned for
any time not less than one, nor more than three months.”
If any person shall embezzle or unlawfully deface, alter, change, substitute or de-
stroy any ticket, list of voters, tally-paper or certificate, taken or made at any election,
aforesaid, he shall, on conviction, suffer imprisonment for a term not less than twelve
months, nor more than three years, at the discretion of the court, and be fined in any
sum not less than one hundred, nor more than one thousand dollars.”
If any assessor shall intentionally neglect or refuse to assess any citizen of this com-
monwealth, who is or shall be subject to assessment by law; or shall, in like manner,
neglect or refuse to return the name of the person so assessed to the commissioners of
the proper county ; or intentionally neglect or refuse to perform any other duty en-
joined on him by the provisions of this act, he shall, on conviction thereof, be fined in
apy sum not less than fifty, nor more than two hundred dollars."
separate. 2 Pars. 480.
See 2 Duvall 373.
1 See tit. “ Bribery.”’ Election frauds, the pun-
ishment of which is not prescribed by statute
are indictable at common law. 97 Penn, St, 397.
Bright. Elect. Cas. 711,
Purd, 494.
2 Act 2 July 1839 297. Purd. 493,
5 Thid. 2 99.
4 Thid. ¢ 100.
5 Thid. ¢ 101.
6 Act 19 May 1887. Purd. 494, |
7 The inspectors, judges and clerks cannot be
joined in the same indictment, where the of-
fences are different, and the duties distinct and
8 Act 2 July 1839 2 102.
9 Ibid. 2103. That is, by a fine of not less
than $50, nor more than $200. The 98th, 107th
and 109th sections of this act appear to be sup-
plied and repealed by act 13 June 1840 3 15.
10 Act 2 July 1839 3104. Purd. 494.
11 Thid. 3 105.
12 Ibid. ¢ 106,
18 Thid, 3 108.
ELECTIONS. 397
If any person shall prevent, or attempt to prevent, any officers of an election under
this act, from holding such election, or use or threaten any violence to any such
officer, or shall interrupt or improperly interfere with him in the execution of his
duty; or shall block up or attempt to block up the window, or avenue to any
window where the same may be holden; or shall riotously disturb the peace at
such election; or shall use or practice any intimidation, threats, force or violence,
with design’ to influence unduly, or overawe any elector, or to prevent him from
voting, or to restrain the freedom of choice, such person, on conviction, shall be
fined in any sum not exceeding five hundred dollars, and be imprisoned for any
time not less than one nor more than twelve months. And if it shall be shown to
the court, where the trial of such offence shall be had, that the person so offending
was not a resident of the city, ward, district or township where the said offence was
committed, and not entitled to vote therein, then, on conviction, he shall be sen-
tenced to pay a fine not less than one hundred, nor more than one thousand dollars,
and be imprisoned not less than six months, nor more than two years.
If any person, not by law qualified, shall fraudulently vote at any election within
this commonwealth, or being otherwise qualified, shall vote out of his proper dis-
trict, or if any person, knowing the want of such qualification, shall aid or procure
such person to vote, the person or persons so offending shall, on conviction, be fined
in any sum not exceeding two hundred dollars, and be imprisoned for any term not
exceeding three months.*
If any person shall vote at more than one election district, or otherwise fraud-
ulently vote more than once, on the same day, or shall fraudulently fold and deliver
to the inspector two tickets together, with the intent to illegally vote, or shall vote
the same, or if any person shall advise and procure another so to do, he or they so
offending, shall, on conviction, be fined in any sum not less than fifty, nor more
than five hundred dollars, and be imprisoned for any term not less than three, nor
more than twelve months.‘ .
If any person not a citizen of this commonwealth,® shall vote or attempt to vote,
at any special, general or presidential election, held in this commonwealth, he shall
be guilty of felony, and on conviction, be sentenced to pay a fine, not exceeding
five hundred dollars, and undergo an imprisonment by separate or solitary confine-
ment at labor, not less than two, nor more than five years.®
If any person shall, through solicitation, invitation or device, persuade or prevail
on any person, not a citizen of this commonwealth, to vote, or attempt to vote, at
any special, general or presidential election in this commonwealth; or shall,
by any means, aid, encourage or abet any such attempt; the person so offending
shall be guilty of felony, and on conviction, shall be sentenced to pay a fine, not
exceeding five hundred dollars,and undergo an imprisonment, by separate or solitary
confinefment at labor, not less than two, nor more than five years.’
Any person who shall furnish or supply to any elector of this commonwealth, at
any of the polls or voting places, any ballot or ticket falsely representing it to
contain names not thereon, with the intent and purpose of defrauding said voter
out of his expressed choice, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor; and on
conviction, shall pay a fine not to exceed one hundred dollars, or imprisonment not
to exceed one year, one or both, or either, at discretion of the court: Provided,
This act shall apply to both general and primary elections.
If any person not qualified to vote in this commonwealth, agreeable to law
(exeept the sons of qualified citizens), shall appear at any place of election, for
the purpose of issuing tickets, or of influencing® the citizens qualified to vote, he
shall, on conviction, forfeit and pay any sum not exceeding one hundred dollars for
every such offence, and be imprisoned for any term not exceeding three months.”
1To constitute this offence, there must be a Hlect. Cas. 695. 7 Rhode [sland 349. 29 Cal.
preconceived intention to intimidate the officers, 678. 3 Dutch. 105.
or interrupt the election. 3 Y. 429. 4 Dall. 253. 7 Act 6 April 187637. Purd. 495. See Bright.
® Act 2 July 1839 3110. Purd. 494. Elect. Cas. 695. 25 Fed. Rep. 28.
5Tbid. 3119. See act 6 April 1870 2 6. . 8 Act 13 June 1883 31. Purd. 495.
“Thid. 3 120. 9 It is not necessary, to complete the offence,
5 An attempt to vote illegally, by one who is that the party should have succeeded in his en-
a citizen, is an indictable offence, 10 Phila. 211, deavors to induce others to vote. 3 Y. 65.
Bee Purd. 487, pl. 58. 10 Act 2 July 1839 3121. Purd. 495.
6 Act 6 April 1870 2 6. Purd.495. See Bright.
398 ELECTIONS.
Any person who shall unlawfully strike, wound or commit any assault and battery
upon the person of any elector, at or near any election poll, during the holding
of any election, shall be deemed guilty of a high misdemeanor, and upon convic-
tion thereof, he shall be fined not less than one hundred dollars, or more than
five hundred, and be imprisoned for a term not less than three months, or than one
ear.
si If any person shall, wilfully and corruptly, make or procure any person to make
falsely any oath or affirmation, required or authorized by this act, such person shall
suffer such penalties and disabilities as are incurred on conviction of wilful and
corrupt perjury, or subornation of perjury.”
If any person shall knowingly publish, utter or make use of any forged or false
receipt or certificate, with intent to impose the same upon, or deceive, any inspector
or judge, at any election as aforesaid, such person shall, on conviction, be fined in
any sum not less than fifty, or more than five hundred dollars, and suffer imprison-
ment not less than six months, nor more than two years.
If any prothonotary or sheriff shall neglect or refuse to perform any of the
duties hereinbefore enjoined upon him, or shall wilfully misbehave in the doing
thereof, he shall, on conviction thereof, be fined in any sum not less than one hun-
dred, nor exceeding five hundred dollars, and shall suffer imprisonment for a term
not exceeding twelve months.*
If any justice of the peace shall refuse to receive any ballot-box delivered to him,
as is hereinbefore provided, or having received the same, shall neglect the safe-
keeping thereof, he shall, on conviction of any such refusal or neglect, be fined in
any sum not less than one hundred, nor more than one thousand dollars.’
Every specific fine or forfeiture imposed by this act, may be recovered by
action of debt, in the name of the commonwealth, as debts of like amount are
by law recoverable, or by indictment in the court of quarter sessions of the proper
county; and where the fine and forfeiture is not specific, the proceeding shall be
by indictment in the quarter sessions of the proper county: Provided, That all
such suits and prosecutions shall be instituted within one year next after the cause
thereof shall accrue, unless otherwise herein provided.®
If any officer or officers required to perform any duty by the provisions of this
act, shall neglect or refuse to perform the same, he or they, so offending, shall be
considered and adjudged guilty of a misdemeanor in office, and shall, on conviction,
be fined in any sum not less than twenty, nor more than two hundred dollars; and
where the duties required of any officer herein named are the same as those required
by the provisions of the act to which this is a supplement, the penalties inflicted
by said act, for violation of such duty, be and the same are hereby extended to
the duty herein required.”
Whenever, in the investigation of any contested election, whether befare any
committee of councils, any court of the city and county of Philadelphia, or com-
mittee of the senate or house of representatives, or a joint committee thereof,
it shall appear that in any election division of said city, the officers of election
shall have wilfully received the votes of ten persons or upwards, whose names are
not contained in the list of taxable inhabitants, furnished to the election officers
of such division, by the city commissioners, withoué requiring proof of the pay-
ment of taxes, citizenship and residence, which now are, or hereafter may be,
required by law, such dereliction of duty shall be deemed a misdemeanor ; upon
conviction whereof, the said officers of election shall be fined in a sum not exceed-
ing one thousand dollars, and be imprisoned for a period not exceeding two years,
(or) both or either, at the discretion of the court.
It shall not be lawful for any political organization to parade through the streets
. the a of Philadelphia after dark, within ten days next preceding any general
election.
VAct 6 April 1870 ¢ 9. Purd. 495, There Act 2 July 1839 3126. Purd. 495.
must be proof that the party assaulted had a
right to vote at that poll, in order to convict. 8
W.N. OC, 215.
2 Act 2 July 1839 3 124, Purd. 495.
Phila, 594,
§ Ibid. 2 125.
See 12
§ Thid. 3 127,
§ Ibid. ¢ 128,
7 Act 13 June 1840 215. Purd. 495. See 38.
Leg. Int. 269.
8 Act 17 April 1866 2 3.
Purd. 496.
® Act 10 April 1867 3 1.
Ibid.
ELECTIONS. 399
Any person violating the provisions of this act, shall be liable to a penalty not
exceeding fifty dollars, and an imprisonment not exceeding sixty days.!
If any election officer shall refuse or neglect to require such proof of the right
of suffrage as is prescribed by this law or the laws to which this is a supplement,
from any person offering to vote, whose name is not on the list of assessed voters,
or whose right to vote is challenged by any qualified voter present, and shall admit
such person to vote, without requiring such proof, every person so offending shall,
upon conviction, be guilty of a high misdemeanor, and shall be sentenced, for
every such offence, to pay a fine, not exceeding one hundred dollars, or to undergo
an imprisonment, not more than one year, or both, or either, at the discretion of
the court.?
If any prothonotary, clerk, or yhe deputy of either, or any other person, shall
affix the seal of office to any naturalization paper, or permit the same to be affixed,
or give out, or cause or permit the same to be given out, in blank, whereby it may
be fraudulently used, or furnish a naturalization certificate to any person who shall
not have been duly examined and sworn in open court, in the.presence of some
of the judges thereof, according to the act of congress, or shall aid in, connive at, or
in any way permit the issue of any fraudulent naturalization certificate, be shall be
guilty of a high misdemeanor ; or if any one shall fraudulently use any such certifi-
cate of naturalization, knowing that it was fraudulently issued, or shall vote, or
attempt to vote thereon, or if any one shall vote, or attempt to vote, on any certifi-
cate of naturalization not issued to him, he shall be guilty of a high misdemeanor ;
and either or any of the persons, their aiders or abettors, guilty of either of the
misdemeanors aforesaid, shall, on conviction, be fined in a sum not exceeding one
thousand dollars, and imprisoned in the proper penitentiary for a period not exceed-
ing three years.’
Any person who, on oath or affirmation, in or before any court in this state, or
officer authorized to administer oaths, shall, to procure a certificate of naturaliza-
tion, for himself or any other person, wilfully depose, declare or affirm any matter
to be fact, knowing the same to be false, or shall, in like manner, deny any matter to
oe fact, knowing the same to be true, shall be deemed guilty of perjury ; and any
certificate of naturalization issued in pursuance of any such deposition, declaration
or affirmation shall be null and void; and it shall be the duty of the court issuing
the same, upon proof being made before it, that it was fraudulently obtained, to
take immediate measures for recalling the same for cancellation. And any person
who shall vote, or attempt to vote, on any paper so obtained, or who shall in any
way aid in, connive at, or have any agency whatever in the issue, circulation or use
of any fraudulent naturalization certificate, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor,
and upon conviction thereof, shall undergo an imprisonment in the penitentiary
for not more than two years, and pay a fine not more than one thousand dollars for
every such offence, or either, or both, at the discretion of the court.*
Any assessor, election officer or person appointed as an overseer, who shall neglect,
or refuse to perform any duty enjoined by this act, without reasonable or legal cause,
shall be subject to a penalty of one hundred dollars ; and if any assessor shall assess
any person as a voter who is not qualified, or shall refuse to assess any one who is
qualified, he shall be guilty of a misdemeanor in office, and on conviction, be pun-
ished by fine or imprisonment, and also be subject to an action for damages by the
party aggrieved. And if any person shall fraudulently alter, add to, deface or
destroy any list of voters, made out as directed by this act, or tear down or remove
the same from the place where it has been fixed, with fraudulent or mischievous
intent, or for any improper purpose, the person so offending shall be guilty of a
high misdemeanor, and on conviction, shall be punished by a fine, not exceeding
five hundred dollars, or imprisonment, not exceeding two years, or both, at the
discretion of the court.
The
1 Act 10 April 1867 322. Purd. 496.
? Aot 17 April 1869 46. Ibid. By 2138, it ia
provided that none of the provisions of this act
shall apply to the city of Philadelphia, except
22 12 and 13. But its provisions were re-en-
acted, generally by the act 30 January 1874 3
12. See 105 Penn. St. 488. 1 Del. Co. R. 50.
¥ Act 17 April 1869 {2 12. Purd. 496,
offences described in this and the succeeding
sections are also punished by the laws of the
United States, and jurisdiction thereof is con-
ferred upon the federal courts. 1 Rev. Stat. 3%
5425-7. See 11 Wall. 88.
4 Act 17 April 1869 2 13.
5 Ibid. 3 14.
Purd. 496.
400 ELECTIONS.
If any person, upon any false representation, or by the production of any forged,
false or spurious naturalization certificate, or upon any such certificate not duly
issued according to the act of congress, shall cause his name to be placed, or shall
attempt to have his name placed, upon any extra assessment list for election pur-
poses, or upon any list of qualified electors authorized or required to be made by
any law of this commonwealth, or shall vote or attempt to vote at any general or
presidential election, every such person, on conviction thereof, shall be adjudged
guilty of a high misdemeanor, and shall be sentenced to imprisonment in the jail
of the proper county for a term not less than twelve months; and every person
who shall aid or abet any other person in any such false representation or attempt
shall, on conviction thereof, be adjudged guilty of a high misdemeanor, and suffer
the like penalty.’
It shall not be lawful for any person or persons keeping a public-house or drink-
ing-place, either licensed or unlicensed, to sell spirituous or malt liquors as a
drink, to sell, furnish or give away, to be used as a drink, any spirituous or malt
liquors, wine or any other intoxicating beverage, on any part of any day set apart,
or to be set apart, for any general or special election, by the citizens in any election
district or division within this commonwealth, where an election is in progress,
during the hours when, by law, in said district, the election polls are required to
be kept open?
Any person violating any of the provisions of the first section of this act shall
be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and on conviction thereof, shall be subject to
imprisonment in the jail of the proper county, for a term of not more than one
hundred days; and in addition to the above, shall also be subject to a fine of not
more than five hundred dollars and costs, at the discretion of the court.’
It shall be the duty of the constables of the several townships, wards and boroughs
of this commonwealth, under the same penalty as mentioned in section 2d, to make
returo to the next court of quarter sessions of the proper county, the name or
names of any person or persons offending under the first section of this act: Pro-
vided, Nothing herein shall prevent any other person or persons from prosecuting
for such offence.‘
Any assessor, election officer or person appointed as an overseer, who shall
neglect or refuse to perform any duty enjoined by this act, without reasonable or
legal cause, shall be subject to a penalty of one hundred dollars; and if any assessor
shall knowingly assess any person as a voter who is not qualified, or shall wilfully
refuse to assess any one who is qualified, he shall be guilty of a misdemeanor in
office, and on conviction be punished by a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars,
or imprisonment not exceeding two years, or both, at the discretion of the court,
and also be subject to an action for damages by the party aggrieved. And if any
person shall fraudulently alter, add td, deface or destroy any list of voters made
out as directed by this act, or tear down or remove the same from the place where
it has been fixed, with fraudulent or mischievous intent, or for any improper pur-
pose, the person so offending shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and on conviction
shall be punished by a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars, or imprisonment not
exceeding two years, or both, at the discretion of the court. And if any person
shall, by violence or intimidation, drive, or attempt, to drive from the polls any
person or persons appointed by the court to act as overseers of an election, or in
any way wilfully prevent said overseers from performing the duties enjoined upon
them by this act, such person shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction
thereof, shall be punished by a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars, or by im-
prisonment not exceeding two years, or both, at the discretion of the court.
Any person who shall, on the day of any election, visit a polling place in any
election district at which he is not entitled to vote, and shall use any intimidation
or violence for the purpose of preventing any officer of election from performing
the duties required of him by law, or for the purpose of preventing any qualified
voter of such district exercising his right to vote, or from exercising his right to
challenge any person offering to vote, such person shall be deemed guilty of a mis-
demeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall be punished by a fine not exceeding
1 Act 17 April 1869 2 38. Purd. 497. See 2 5 Act 13 March 1872 @ 2. «
Brewst. 145-6. 4 Thid. 2 3.
2 Act 13 March 1872 31. Ibid.
ELECTIONS. 401
one thousand dollars, or by imprisonment not exceeding two years, or both, at the
discretion of the court, Any clerk, overseer or election officer, who shall disclose
how any elector shall have voted, unless required to do soas a witness in a judicial
proceeding, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall be
punished by a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars, or by imprisonment not
exceeding two years, or both, in the discretion of the court.
If any prothonotary, clerk, or the deputy of either, or any other person, shall
affix the seal of any court to any naturalization paper, or permit the same to be
affixed, or give out, or cause or permit such naturalization paper to be given out, in
blank, whereby it ‘may be fraudulently used, or furnish a naturalization certificate to
any person who shall not have béen duly examined and sworn in open court, in
the presence of some of the judges thereof, according to the act of congress, or
shall aid in, connive at, or in any way permit the issue of any fraudulent natural -
ization certificate, he shall be guilty of a misdemeanor; or if any one shall
fraudulently use any such certificate of naturalization, knowing that it was fraud-
ulently issued, or shall vote or attempt to vote thereon, or if any one shall vote or
attempt to vote on any certificate of naturalization not issued to him, he shall be
guilty of misdemeanor; and either or any of the persons, their aiders or abettors,
found guilty of either of the misdemeanors aforesaid, shall be fined in a sum not
exceeding one thousand dollars, and imprisoned in the proper penitentiary for a
period not exceeding three years.”
Any person who, on oath or affirmation, in or before any court in this state,
or officer authorized to administer oaths, shall, to procure a certificate of natural-
ization for himself or any other person, wilfully depose, declare or affirm any
matter to be fact, knowing the same to be false, or shall in like manner deny
any matter to be fact, knowing the same to be true, shall be deemed guilty of
perjury; and any certificate of naturalization issued in pursuance of any such
deposition, declaration or affirmation, shall be null and void; and it shall be the
duty of the court issuing the same, upon proof being made before it that it was
fraudulently obtained, to take immediate measures for recalling the same for can-
cellation. And any person who shall vote or attempt to vote on any paper so
obtained, or who shall in any way aid in, connive at, or have any agency whatever
in the issue, circulation or use of any fraudulent naturalization certificate, shall be
deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof, shall undergo an
imprisonment in the penitentiary for not more than two years, and pay a fine not
more than one thousand dollars, for every such offence, or either, or both, at the
discretion of the court.’
No person who shall hereafter be a candidate for the nomination, or for election
to the senate or house of representatives, or to any office of the judiciary, or to any
state, municipal or county office in this commonwealth, shall pay or contribute,
either directly or indirectly, any money or other valuable thing, or knowingly allow
it to be done by others for him, either for the nomination, election or appointment,
except necessary expenses as follows, to wit:
I. For printing and travelling expenses.
II. For dissemination of information to the public.
III. For political meetings, demonstrations and conventions.*
The foregoing expenses may be incurred, either in person, or through other
individuals or committees of organizations duly constituted for the purpose, but
nothing contained in this act shall be so construed as to authorize the payment of
money or other valuable thing for the vote or influence of any elector, either
directly or indirectly, at primary, township, general or special elections, nominat-
ing conventions, or for any corrupt purposes whatever incident to an election.
And all judicial, state, county and municipal officers hereafter elected shall,
before entering upon the duties of their respective offices, take and subscribe the
oath prescribed by section first, of article seven, of the constitution of this com-
monwealth5 ,
Every person violating either of the provisions of this act shall be guilty of a
1 Act 30 January 1874 219. Purd. 497. 4 See 91 Penn. St. 493. 2 Kulp 21. 11 Daly
2 Thid. 2 20. 354.
§ Ibid. 2 21. 96 5 Act 18 April 1874 31. Purd. 498.
402 ELECTIONS.
misdemeanor, and on conviction, shall be subject to a fine not exceeding one thou-
sand dollars, and to imprisonment not exceeding one year, or both, or either, at the
discretion of the court." at
It shall be unlawful for any committee, or member thereof, directly or indirectly,
to demand of any public officer, subordinate or employee, holding any office or posi-
tion of honor, trust or profit in this commonwealth, or otherwise engaged or employed
in the service of this state, or from any officer, subordinate or employee, in any way
engaged or employed in the service of any city or county of this state, any assess-
ment or per-centage of any money, property or their equivalent in anything of value,
with the understanding, either expressed or implied, that the same may or shall be
used for any political purpose whatsoever.’ , ;
Any person or persons violating any of the foregoing provisions of this act, shall
be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof, shall be sentenced
to pay a fine not to exceed one hundred dollars.’ :
If a candidate for any office within this commonwealth shall, directly or indirectly,
give, offer or promise to give, or procure any other person to give, offer or promise
to give, to any elector, any gift or reward in money, goods or other valuable thing,
or any security for the payment or the delivery of money, goods or other valuable
thing, or any office, emolument or employment, on condition, express or implied,
that such elector shall cast, give, retain or withhold his vote, or use his influence
at a nominating election or delegate election, or cast, give or substitute another to
east or give, his vote or use his influence at a nominating convention, for or against
the nomination of any particular candidate for nomination, so as to procure such
person to be voted for, at any election to take place, the person so hiring, procuring,
influencing, abetting, endeavoring or offering, either directly, or indirectly through
others, their aiders or abetters, to procure the person to be voted for by such elee-
tors, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and, on conviction, shall be sentenced to pay
a fine not exceeding three hundred dollars, and be imprisoned for a period not
exceeding three months.*
If any elector, authorized to vote at any public election afterwards to take place
within this commonwealth, for any office, shall, directly or indirectly, accept or
receive from any person desiring to be nominated as a candidate for office, or from
the friends of any such person, any gift or reward in money, goods or other valuable
thing, or any office or employment, under an agreement or promise, express or
implied, that such elector shall give or withhold his vote for the nomination of such
a person as a candidate for office at such election, or shall accept or receive the
promise of any person, that he shall thereafter receive any gift or reward ic money,
goods, position or other valuable thing, if he will vote for the nomination of such a
person as a candidate for office, and shall thereafter vote for the nomination of
such person, he shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and on conviction shall pay a fine,
not exceeding three hundred dollars, and be imprisoned for a term of time not
exceeding three months.®
If any elector shall, directly or indirectly, offer to give his vote or his influence,
at any nominating election, delegate election or nominating convention, to any per-
son desiring to be nominated as a candidate for office, or to the friends of any such
person, in consideration, that for such vote or influence, he is to receive any gift
or reward in money, goods or other valuable thing, or any office or employment, he
shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and on conviction shall pay a fine, not exceed-
ing three hundred dollars, and undergo a period of imprisonment not exceeding
three months.®
If any person, not qualified to vote at a general election, shall vote at a nominat-
ing election held by any political party, or if any person shall procure, advise or
induce such disqualified person to so vote, or if any person shall vote at more than
one election district, or otherwise vote more than once on the same for the nom-
ination of a candidate, or shall fraudulently vote more than one ticket for the
same candidate, at the same time, or if any person shall advise or procure another
so to do, he or they shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and on conviction, shall be
4 Aot 18 April 1874 3 2. Purd. 498, inours a disqualification for holding any office of
2 Act 13 June 1883 ¢ 1. Ibid. trust or profit under the commonwealth under art,
3 Ibid. 2 2, VIII. 3 9 of the constitution. i7 W. N. C. 481.
4 Act 8 June 188] 31. Purd. 481, 6 Act 8 June 1881 3 8. Purd. 481.
5 Ibid. @ 2. The defendant, on conviction,
t
ELECTIONS. 403
fined, not exceeding the sum of two hundred dollars, and imprisoned for a term of
time not exceeding three months.
In all cases where a person is elected or chosen, or shall act as a delegate to a
convention to make nominations for offices, and shall receive, accept or solicit any
bribe in money, goods or thing of value, or any office or position, as an inducement
to make or join in any nomination for any person to be voted for as an officer or
candidate for office, or shall, in like manner and for like reason, agree to abstain
from voting for any particular person, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and on
conviction, shall be sentenced to pay a fine of not more than one hundred dollars,
and be imprisoned not exceeding three months.?
Any person, elected, chosen or acting as a member of the county or executive
committee of any party, or as a judge of a return-board to count up and cast
the votes polled at a primary election, held to make nominations for office, or
any person appointed a clerk of such return-board, who shall directly or indirectly
accept, receive or solicit money, office, appointment, employment, testimonial,
reward or other thing of value, or the promise of all or either of them to influ-
ence his vote or action in the discharge, performance or non-performance of any
act, duty or obligation pertaining to such office, shall be guilty of a misde-
meanor, and on conviction thereof, shall be sentenced to pay a fine of not more
than one hundred dollars, and be imprisoned for a time not exceeding three
months,
Any person or persons who shall directly or indirectly by offer or promise of
money, office, appointment, employment, testimonial, reward or other thing of value,
or who shall, by threats or intimidation, endeavor to influence a member of a county
or executive committee of any party, a judge or clerk of any return-board, in the
discharge, performance or non-performance of any act, duty or obligation pertain-
ing to such office, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and on conviction thereof,
shall be sentenced to pay a fine of two hundred dollars, and to undergo an im-
prisonment not exceeding six months.*
A voter who shall allow his ballot to be seen by any person with an apparent inten-
tion of letting it be known how he is about to vote, or shall cast or attempt to cast
any other ballot than the official ballot which has been given to him by the proper
election officer, or shall falsely declare to a judge of election that by reason of any
disability he desires assistance in the preparation of his ballot, or shall wilfully violate
any other provision of this act, or any person who shall interfere with any voter when
inside said inclosed space, or when marking his ballot, or who shall endeavor to induce
any voter before depositing his ballot to show how he marks or has marked his ballot,
or who shall disclose the contents of any ballot that has been marked by his help, or
who, except when lawfully commanded by a return-judge or a competent court, shall
loosen, cut or unfasten the corner pasted down over the number on any ballot, shall be
guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction shall be sentenced to pay a fine not ex-
ceeding one hundred dollars, or to undergo an imprisonment for not more than three
months, or both, at the discretion of the court.*
Any person who shall, prior to an election, wilfully deface or destroy any list of
candidates, posted in accordance with the provisions of this act, or who, during an
election, shall wilfully deface, tear down, remove or destroy any card of instruction, or
specimen ballot, printed or posted for the instruction of voters, or who shall, during
an election, wilfully remove or destroy any of the supplies or conveniences furnished
to enable a voter to prepare his ballot, or shall wilfully hinder the voting of others,
shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction shall be sentenced to pay a fine
not exceeding one hundred dollars, or to undergo an imprisonment for not more than
three months, or both, at the discretion of the court.®
Any person who shall falsely make or wilfully deface or destroy any certificate of
nomination, or nomination paper, or any part thereof, or any letter of withdrawal, or
file any certificate of nomination, or nomination paper, or letter of withdrawal, know-
ing the same or any part thereof to be falsely made, or suppress any certificate of
nomination, or nomination paper, or any part thereof which has been duly filed, or
1 Act 8 June 18813 4. Purd. 481. 4 Act 10 June 1893 3 30. Purd. 748.
2 Ibid. 3 5. § Ibid. 2 31.
® Ibid. @ 6.
404 ELECTIONS.
forge, or falsely make the official indorsement on any ballot, or wilfully destroy or de-
face any ballot, or wilfully delay the delivery of any ballots, shall be guilty of a misde-
meanor, and upon conviction shall be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding one thou-
sand .dollars, or to undergo an imprisonment for not more than one year, or both, at
the discretion of the court.?
Any public officer upon whom a duty is imposed by this act, who shall negligently
or wilfully fail to perform such duty, or who shall negligently or wilfully perform it
in such a way as to hinder the objects of this acts, or who shall negligently or wilfully
violate any of the provisions thereof, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon con-
viction shall be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars, or to un-
dergo an imprisonment for not more than one year, or both, at the discretion of the
court.”
Any printer employed by the commissioners of any county to print any official
ballots, or any person engaged in printing the same, who shall appropriate to himself,
or give or deliver or knowingly permit to be taken any of said ballots by any other
person than such commissioners, or their duly authorized agent, or shall wilfully
print, or cause to be printed any official ballot in any other form than that prescribed
by such commissioners, or with any other names thereon, or with the names spelled
otherwise than as directed by them, or the names or printing thereon arrranged in
any other way than that authorized and directed by this act, shall be guilty of a mis-
demeanor, and upon conviction shall be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding one
thousand dollars, or to undergo an imprisonment for not more than five years, or both,
at the discretion of the court.?
Any person other than an officer charged by law with the care of ballots, or a person
entrusted by any such officer with the care of the same for a purpose required by law,
who shall have in his possession outside the voting room any official ballot, or any
person who shall make or have in possession any counterfeit or an official ballot, shall
be guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction shall be sentenced to pay a fine not
exceeding one thousand dollars, or to undergo an imprisonment for not more than one
year, or both, at the discretion of the court.*
XVII. MiscELLANEOUS PROVISIONS.
It shall be lawful for the governor of this commonwealth, on the representation of
the commonwealth, or of the municipal authority of any city or borough, town or in-
corporated district in this commonwealth, that from the prevalence of any malignant
or contagious disease, in such city, borough, town or district, the lives of the electors
may be in danger by attending at the places fixed by law for holding elections within
the same, to direct the sheriff of the proper county to give notice that the election for
such city, borough, town or district, will be held at such place within the limits, or in
the neighborhood of the same, as he, the governor may judge most safe and conve-
nient; and it shall be the duty of such sheriff to give public notice of such place, in
the manner hereinbefore required, at least seven days before the day of election, under
the same penalty as hereinafter provided.®
No body of troops in the army of the United States, or of this commonwealth, shall
be present, either armed or unarmed, at any place of election within this common-
wealth, during the time of such election: Provided, That nothing herein contained
shall be so construed as to prevent any officer or soldier, from exercising the right of
suffrage in the election district to which he may belong, if otherwise qualified accord-
ing to law.®
In all cases where a sheriff is directed to perform any duty by the provisions of this
act, and said sheriff is absent from the district, or there is any vacancy in said office,
the duty directed to be performed by the sheriff, shall be done and performed by the
coroner of the proper county, who shall be entitled to the same fees and subject to
like penalties.’
The assessors shall each receive the same compensation for the time necesarily
" Thid. 2 32. § Act 2 July 1839 3.95. Purd. 727. And see
: tae og 1 Rev. Stat. U.S. 3 2002. Bright. Elect. Cas.
id. ci 603.
4 Thid. ¢ 35. T Act 2 July 1839 3 96. Purd. 728.
5 Act July 1839 394. Purd. 726.
EMBANKMENTS, 405
spent in performing the duties hereby enjoined, as is provided by law to assessors
making valuations, to be paid by the county commissioners, as in other cases: and
it shall not be lawful for any assessor to assess a tax against any person whatever
within sixty-one days next preceding the annual election in November; any violation
of this provision shall be a misdemeanor, and subject the officer so offending to a fine,
on conviction, not exceeding one hundred dollars, or to imprisonment not exceeding
three months, or both, at the discretion of the court.!
The assessors directed to be appointed and elected by the 14th and 15th sections of
the act, approved the 30th day of January, Anno Domini 1874, are hereby declared
to be assessors only to perform such duties as are now required by law of assessors,
incident to the holding of elections and registration of voters; and that the office of
assessor for purposes of valuation with all the duties incident thereto shall continue
and remain as now provided for by law: Provided, That in townships, boroughs and
wards composing but one election district, the assessors for purposes of valuation shall
be assessors for the holding of elections and the registration of voters.”
The commissioners of the several counties of this commonwealth, are hereby author-
ized and empowered to fix the compensation for lights, rent and fuel for election pur-
poses, in each and every township, borough, ward and election district in the respec-
tive counties; which said compensation shall be fixed and established at least once
every three years, by resolution duly entered upon the minutes of said commissioners ;
and the said expenses shall be paid by said respective counties, according to the com-
pensation so ascertained and entered upon said minutes, and not otherwise.
All the duties imposed by this act upon county commissioners, shall be performed,
in the city of Philadelphia, by the city commissioners.*
All funds arising from fines imposed and collected in pursuance of the foregoing sec-
tions, shall be applied to the common schools of the county in which said fines may
have been collected, and to be apportioned among the several school districts accord-
ing to the population thereof.® '
XVIII. NoMINATIONS TO OFFICE—BALLOTS—BOOTHS.
The provisions of the act 10th June 1893 relating to nominations to office, to the
preparation and casting of ballots and the arrangement of election rooms or booths
will be found set forth at large in Brightly’s Purdon’s Digest, pages 737-743.
Embankments.
Acr 19 May 1879. Purd. 521.
Sect. 1. Any person or persons who shall maliciously, after the passage of this act,
break down, destroy or remove, or in any manner whatsoever injure, impair or
damage, in whole or in part, any rip-rap wall, dam, bank or breakwater, built or
formed or composed of stone, cinders or other materials, along property fronting or
abutting on any river or stream within this commonwealth, or who shall remove, carry
away or tear up any stones, cinders or other materials of which such rip-rap wall,
dam, bank or breakwater shall be in whole or in part composed, shall be deemed
guilty of a misdemeanor, and shall, on conviction thereof in the court of quarter ses-
sions of the county in which the offence shall have been committed, be fined, for each
offence, not exceeding two hundred dollars, or imprisonment, in the county jail or
workhouse, not exceeding six months: Provided, That prosecutions under this act
shall be begun within two years from the time of the commission of the offence: And
provided further, That the provisions of this act shall not apply to counties having a
population of over five hundred thousand inhabitants.
1 Act 30 January 1874 218. Purd. 721. 4 Act 30 January 1874 3 24. Purd. 732.
? Act 13 February 187431. Ibid. 5 Ibid. 2 25.
5 Act 8 May 1876 @ 1.
[ 406 J
Canbeszlement,
I. Provisions of the Penal Code. IL. Judicial decisiors.
I. PRovVISIONS OF THE PENAL CODE.
Ip any officer of this commonwealth, or of any city, borough, county or township
thereof, shall loan out, with or without interest or return therefor, any money or
valuable security received by him, or which may be in his possession, or under his
control, by virtue of his office, he shall be guilty of a misdemeanor in office, and on
conviction be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars, and
undergo an imprisonment, by separate or solitary confinement at labor, not exceed-
ing five years; and if still in office, be adjudged thereafter incapable of exercising
the same, and the said office shall be forthwith declared vacant by the court
passing the sentence.’
If any such officer shall enter into any contract or agreement with any bank, cor-
poration or individual, or association of individuals, by which said officer is to derive
any benefit, gain or advantage from the deposit with such bank, corporation, or indi-
vidual, or association, of any money or valuable security held by him, or which may
be in his possession, or under his control, by virtue of his said office, he shall be
guilty of a misdemeanor, and, on conviction, be sentenced to pay a fine not exceed-
ing one thousand dollars, and to undergo an imprisonment not exceeding one year;
and if still in office, be adjudged thereafter incapable of exercising the same, and
the said office shall be forthwith declared vacant by the court passing sentence.”
If any state, county, township or municipal officer of this commonwealth, charged
with the collection, safe-keeping, transfer or disbursement of public money, shall
convert to his own use, in any way whatsoever, or shall use, by way of investment,
in any kind of property or merchandise, any portion of the public money intrusted
to him for collection, safe-keeping, transfer or disbursement, or shall prove a
defaulter, or fail to pay over the same when thereunto legally required by the
state, county or township treasurer, or other proper officer or person authorized to
demand and receive the same—every such act shall be deemed and adjudged to be
an embezzlement of so much of said money as shall be thus taken, converted,
invested, used or unaccounted for, which is hereby declared a misdemeanor; and
every such officer, and every person or persons whomsoever aiding or abetting, or
being in any way accessory to said act, and being thereof convicted, shall be sen-
tenced to an imprisonment, by separate or solitary confinement at labor, not
exceeding five years, and to pay a fine equal to the amount of the money embezzled?
If any person, being a trustee of any property for the benefit, either wholly or
partially, of some other person, or for any public or charitable purpose, shall, with
intent to defraud, convert or appropriate the same, or any part thereof, to or for his
own use or purpose, or the use or benefit of any other person, or shall, with intent
aforesaid, otherwise dispose of or destroy such property, or any part thereof, he
shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.‘
If any person, being a banker, broker, attorney, merchant or agent, and being
intrusted, for safe custody, with the property of any other person, shall, with intent
to defraud, sell, negotiate, transfer, pledge, or in any manner convert or appropriate
to or for his own use, or the use of any other person, such property, or any part
thereof, he shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.
If any person intrusted with any power of attorney, for the sale or transfer of
any property, shall fraudulently sell or transfer, or otherwise convert such property,
or any part thereof, to his own use or benefit, or the use or benefit of any other
person, he shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.®
If any person, being an officer, director, superintendent, manager, receiver, em
1 Act 31 March 1860 3 62. Purd. 532. 4 Act 31 March 1860 3118. Purd. 499.
4 Thid. @ 63. 5 Ibid. 114. See 49 Penn. St. 478.
3 Tbid, 2 65. Purd. 500, § Ibid. ¢ 115.
EMBEZZLEMENT. A407
ployee, agent, attorney, broker, or member of any bank or other body corporate, or
public company, municipal or guast municipal corporation, shall fraudulently take, |
convert or apply to his own use, or the use of any other person, any of the money
or other property of such bank, body corporate or company, municipal or quasé
municipal corporation or association, or belonging to any person or persons, corpora-
tion or association, and deposited therein, or in possession thereof, he shall be
guilty of a misdemeanor.’
If any person, being an officer, director, superintendent, manager, receiver, em-
ployee, agent, attorney, broker, or member of any body corporate or public com-
pany, or municipal or guast municipal corporation, shall, as such, receive or possess
himself of any money or other property of such corporate or public company,
municipal or guast municipal corporation, otherwise than in payment to him of a
just debt or demand, and shall, with intent to defraud, omit to make, or cause or
direct to be made, a full and true entry thereof in the books and accounts of such
body corporate, public company, municipal or guast municipal corporation, he shall
be guilty of a misdemeanor?
If any officer, director, superintendent, manager, receiver, employee, agent,
attorney, broker, or member of any bank, or other body corporate or public com-
pany, municipal or quasi municipal corporation, shall, with intent to defraud,
destroy, alter, mutilate or falsify any of the books, papers, writings or securities
belonging to the bank, body corporate or public company, municipal or guast muni-
cipal corporation, of which he is a director, officer, superintendent, manager,
receiver, employee, agent, attorney, broker or member, or shall make or concur in
the making of any false entry, or any material omission, in any book of accounts
or other document, he shall be guilty of a misdemeanor
If any officer, director, superintendent, manager, receiver, employee, agent,
attorney, broker, or member of any bank, or other body corporate or public com-
pany, municipal or guasi municipal corporation, shall make, circulate or publish,
or concur in making, circulating or publishing, any written or printed state-
ment or account, which he shall know to be false in any particular, with intent to
deceive or defraud any member, shareholder or creditor of such body corporate or
public company, municipal or guas? municipal corporation, or with intent to induce
any person to become a shareholder or partner therein, or to interest or advance any
money or property to such body corporate or public company, or to enter into
any security for the benefit thereof, (he) shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.
Every person found guilty of a misdemeanor under any or either of the pre-
ceding sections of this title, wherein the nature and extent of the punishment is
not specified, shall be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars,
and to undergo an imprisonment, by separate or solitary confinement at labor, not
exceeding six years.®
If any person shall receive any money, chattel or valuable security which shall
have been so fraudulently disposed of, as to render the party disposing thereof
guilty of a misdemeanor, knowing the same to have been so fraudulently disposed
of, he shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and may be indicted and convicted thereof,
whether the party guilty of the principal misdemeanor shall, or not, have been
previously convicted.
Every person found guilty of a misdemeanor under either of the preceding
sections of this title, wherein the nature and extent of the punishment is not
specified, shall be sentenced to an imprisonment, not exceeding two years, or be
fined in any amount not exceeding one thousand dollars, or both, or either, at the
discretion of the court.
Nothing herein contained shall affect any remedy at law or in equity, which any
party aggrieved might have heretofore had, nor affect or prejudice any agreement
1 Act 12 June 1878 31. Purd. 499. the defect in the original act pointed out in 81
2Tbid. 22. Purd. 509. Penn. St. 389. The 121st section, however, pre-
3Tbid. ¢ 3. Purd. 524. scribes the punishment of other offences than
‘Ibid. ¢ 4. Purd. 509. those embraced in the 5th section of the revised
5Tbid. 35. This act isan amendment of the act.
116th, 117th, 118th, 119th and 12st sections of © Act 31 March 18604120. Purd. 536.
the act 31 March 1860. It was passed to remedy T Ibid. 2121.
408 EMBEZZLEMENL.
entered into, or security given, by any trustee, having for its object the restoration
or repayment of any trust property misappropriated.* p
No such trustee, banker, merchant, broker, attorney, agent, director, officer or
member as aforesaid, shall be enabled or entitled to refuse to make a full and com-
plete discovery by answer to any bill in equity, or to answer any question or
interrogatory in any civil proceeding in avy court of law or equity; but no answer
to any such bill, question or interrogatory, shall be admissible in evidence against
such person charged with any of the said misdemeanors.’
The word “trustee” herein shall mean a trustee on some express trust created
by deed, will or instrument in writing, and shall also include the heir, devisee and
personal representative of any such trustee, and all executors, administrators
and assignees; the word ‘ property” shall include every description of real and
personal property, money, debts and legacies, and all deeds and instruments relating
or evidencing the title or right to recover or receive any money or goods; and shall
also include not only such property as may have been the original subject of a
trust, but any property in which the same may have been converted, and the pro-
ceeds thereof, respectively, or anything acquired by such proceeds.’
The 124th section of the act to which this is a supplement, shall also extend to and
include any guardian or guardians of a minor child or children, appointed by the
orphans’ court of the respective counties, in the same manner as executors, adminis-
trators and assignees.*
If any consignee or factor having the possession of merchandise, with authority
to sell the same, or having possession of any bill of lading, permit, certificate,
receipt or order for the delivery of merchandise, with the like authority, shall
deposit or pledge such merchandise or document, consigned or intrusted to him as
aforesaid, as a security for any money borrowed, or negotiable instrument received
by such consignee or factor, and shall apply or dispose of the same to his own use,
in violation of good faith, with intent to defraud the owner of such merchandise,
and if any consignee or factor shall, with like fraudulent intent, apply or dispose
of, to his own use, any money or negotiable instrument, raised or acquired by
the sale or other disposition of such merchandise, such consignee or factor in
every such case, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and sentenced to pay a fine, not
exceeding two thousand dollars, and undergo an imprisonment. not exceeding five
years.°
If any person engaged in carrying or transporting coal, iron, lumber or other
articles of merchandise, or property whatsoever, within this commonwealth, shall
fraudulently sell or dispose of, or pledge the same, or any part thereof, without the
consent of the owner thereof, such offence shall be deemed a misdemeanor, and the
offender shall, on conviction, be sentenced to pay a fine, not exceeding five hundred
dollars, and to undergo an imprisonment not exceeding one year; or if any person
shall knowingly buy and receive the said merchandise, knowing the same to have
been sold, disposed of, or pledged fraudulently, he shall, on conviction, be sentenced
to the like punishment.®
Whenever any person in the employ of any railroad company, whether such com-
pany is incorporated by this or any other state, shall fraudulently neglect to cancel or
return to the proper officer, company or agent, any coupon or other railroad ticket,
with the intent to permit the same to be used in fraud or injury of any such company ;
or if any person shall steal or embezzle any such coupon or other railroad ticket, or
shall fraudulently stamp or print, or sign any such ticket, or shall fraudulently sell
or put in circulation any such ticket—any person so offending, shall, upon conviction
thereof, be sentenced to pay a fine, not exceeding one thousand dollars, and to un-
dergo an imprisonment, by separate or solitary confinement, at labor, not exceeding
five years.”
Every president, director, cashier, teller, clerk or agent of any bank who shall
embezzle, abstract or wilfully misapply any of the moneys, funds or credits of such
bank, or shall fraudulently and without authority from the directors, issue or put
in circulation any of the notes of such bank, or shall, without such authority,
1 Act 31 March 1860 3 122, Purd. 499. 4 Act 22 April 1863 21. Purd. 500.
2Thid. 2123. See 1T.&H.Pr.Z124, 10 6 Act 31 March 1860 2 125.
Phila. 50. 6 Thid. 3 126,
8 Ibid. 9124, Purd. 499. 7 Anat 1 Maw 188121. Pnrd A223.
EMBEZZLEMENT. 409
fraudulently issue or put forth any certificate of deposit, draw any order or bill of
exchange, make any acceptance, sign any note, bond, draft, bill of exchange, mort-
gage or other instrument of writing, or shall make any false entry on any book,
report or statement of the bank, with an intent, in either case, to injure or defraud
such bank, or to injure or defraud any other company, body corporate or politic, or
any individual person, or to deceive any officer or agent appointed to inspect the
affairs of any bank, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor ; and upon conviction thereof,
shall be confined in the penitentiary, at hard labor, not less than one, nor more
than ten years.!
If any director, officer, agent or other person connected with, or doing business
for or with, any of said (insurance) companies, shall fraudulently embezzle or appro-
priate to his own use, or the use of any other person or persons, any money or
other property belonging to the said institution, or left with or held by the said
company, in trust, as a special deposit or otherwise, he or they, on conviction
thereof, shall be fined in a sum not less than the amount so appropriated or embez-
zled, and sentenced to undergo an imprisonment in the penitentiary, in separate
and solitary confinement, at labor, for a term not exceeding five years, at the dis-
cretion of the court: Provided, That this shall not prevent any person aggrieved
from pursuing his, her or their civil remedy against such person or persons.’
If any director, officer, agent or other person connected with or doing business
for or with any fire, marine, or life insurance company, trust or annuity company,
or any health or casualty insurance company, or any company for the insurance of
horses, mules, cattle and live-stock, incorporated by the state of Pennsylvania, or
any other state of the United States, or by any foreign government, or organized
under the laws of any state or foreign government which has complied with the
insurance laws of this commonwealth, shall fraudulently embezzle or appropriate
to his own use, or the use of any other person or persons, any money or other
property belonging to such company or companies, or left with or held by such
company or companies in trust, as a special deposit or otherwise, he or they, on
conviction thereof, shall be fined in a sum not exceeding nor less than the amount
80 appropriated or embezzled, and sentenced to undergo an imprisonment in the
penitentiary for a term not exceeding five years, or both such fine and imprison-
ment, at the discretion of the court. And in the indictment and trial of any case
under this act, it shall not be necessary, in order to establish a prima facie
case for the commonwealth, to set forth or prove the incorporation or organization
of any such company or companies, except by the verbal testimony of any competent
witness.3
If any person charged with the collection, safe-keeping, or transfer of any state,
county, township, school, city, borough, or municipal taxes, under any law or laws
of this commonwealth, shall convert or appropriate the moneys so collected, or any
part thereof, to his own use, in any way whatever, or shall use by way of invest-
ment in any kind of property or merchandise any portion of the money so collected
by him from such tax or taxes, and shall prove a defaulter or fail to pay over the
same or any part thereof at the time or times, place or places, required by law and
to the person or persons legally authorized to demand and receive the same, every
such act shall be deemed and adjudged to be an embezzlement of so much of said
money as shall be thus taken, converted, appropriated, embezzled, invested, used, or
unaccounted for, which is hereby declared a misdemeanor; and every such tax-
_ collector, and every person or persous whomsoever aiding, or abetting, or being in
any way accessory to such act, and, being thereof convicted, shall be sentenced to
an imprisonment not exceeding five years, or to pay a fine not exceeding five
thousand dollars, or both, at the discretion of the court.*
IL. The treasurer of a school district is indictable for the embezzlement of the
public funds, under the 65th section of the penal code.® And the 107th section
embraces the case of a conductor employed by a railroad company.® So, a priest
who receives money for his.church, and appropriates it to his own use, may be
1 Act 1 May 1861 3 36. Purd. 500. # Act 3 June 188531. Purd. 501.
2 Act 11 April 1862 21. Ibid. 5 86 Penn. St. 416.
8 Act 17 June 1878 31. Ibid. 6 2 Pears. 432.
’
A10 EMBRACERY.
indicted for embezzlement, as an agent.1 And a clerk in the employment of the
gas trustees of Philadelphia is an employee of a municipal corporation who may be
convicted of embezzlement under the act of 1878.2. And so also the treasurer of
an unincorporated beneficial association, though a member, may be indicted, as a
servant, for the embezzlement of the funds received by him.’ An auctioneer may
be convicted of embezzlement, though time was given him, and the sales were made
in the presence of his consignor.*
Embezzlement, however, necessarily involves secrecy and concealment: if, there-
fore, instead of denying the appropriation of property, the defendant, in rendering
his account, admit the appropriation, alleging a right in himself, no matter how
unfounded, or set up an excuse, no matter how frivolous, his offence in taking and
keeping is no embezzlement.
Embezzlement by a cashier of a national bank is not indictable under the state
law ; it is only punishable under the act of congress.®
Any number of distinct acts of embezzlement, not exceeding three, may be
charged in the same ‘count, where they are alleged to have been committed within
six months of one another.” But one indictment charging in a single count the
embezzlement of divers sums of money, received from divers persons, amounting in
the whole to $1200, is bad for duplicity, and will be quashed, on motion.®
Gimbracery,
I. Provisions of the Penal Code. II. Judicial decisions.
Act 31 Marca 1860. Purd. 543, 501.
Sot. 11. If any person shall unlawfully dissuade, hinder, prevent or attempt to
dissuade, hinder or prevent any witness from attending and testifying, who may
have been required to attend and testify either before any committee of the legis-
lature of this state, or before any civil or criminal court, judge, justice or other
judicial tribunal thereof, by virtue of any writ of subpena or other legal process, or
who may have been recognised to attend as a witness on behalf of the common-
wealth or of any defendant, before any court having jurisdiction, to testify in any
case depending or about to be tried in such court—any person so offending shail be
guilty of a misdemeanor, and being thereof convicted, shall be sentenced to pay a
fine not exceeding five hundred dollars, and undergo an imprisonment not exceeding
one year.
Szor. 12. If any person shall attempt to corrupt or influence any juror in a
criminal or civil court, or any arbitrator appointed according to law, by endeavor-
ing, either in conversation or by written communication, or by persuasion, promises
or entreaties, or by any other private means, to bias the mind or judgment of such
juror or arbitrator, as to any cause pending in the court to which such juror has
been summoned, or in which such arbitrator has been appointed or chosen, except
by the strength of evidence or the arguments of himself or his counsel during the
trial or hearing of the case; he shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and, on convie-
tion, be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars, or suffer an
imprisonment not exceeding one year, or both, or either, at the discretion of the
court,
II. Embracery (which is usually classed under the head of bribery) is an attempt
by either party, or a stranger, to corrupt or influence a jury, or to incline them to
favor one side, by gifts or promises, threats or persuasions, or by instructing them
in the cause, or any other way, except by opening and enforcing the evidence by
counsel or otherwise at the trial, whether the jurors gave a verdict or not, and
whether the verdict be true or false?
1 11 Phila. 374, 397. 6 92 Penn. St. 372.
241 Leg. Int. 134. 42 Ibid. 288. 7 2 Wood. 477.
314 W.N. C. 288. See 2 Leg. Opin. 3. 8 1 Kulp 134.
4 8 Phila. 613. 9 5 Cow. 504. 1 Phila. 534, Lewis’ Cr. L. 12%
6 Oar. & M. 501.
ENGROSSING, &. ; All
Writing a letter to the sheriff, by an agent of a party, in the name of the party,
requesting him to summon the agent and two others, all of whom were named, for
the trial of the cause, is an indictable offence, although not accompanied with any
offer of a bribe.
It is both a criminal misdemeanor aud a high contempt in an individual, to com-
municate with a grand jury in reference to any matter which is, or may come
before them.?
It is a gross misbehavior for any person to speak to a juryman, or fora juryman
to permit any person to converse with him respecting the cause he is trying, at any
time after he is summoned, and before the verdict is delivered.* The person who
attempts to labor a jury, merits the most severe punishment, as such conduct
poisons the first sources of justice.*
It is highly improper for any person to converse with, or in the presence of, a
juryman, concerning a cause, pending the trial of the same, and subjects the per-
son so offending to a fine.
Engrossing, Jorestalling and Reqvating.
EnGrossina is the purchasing of large quantities of provisions, with intent to
sell them again at a high price.6 It can be committed only with respect to the
necessaries of life ;? and is an offence at common law?
FoRESTALLING is the buying or contracting for any species of provisions or
merchandise on the way to market, or dissuading persons from bringing their goods
or provisions there, or persuading them to enhance the price when there; any of
which practices make the market dearer to the fair trader.® It is indictable at
common law.”
REGRATING is the buying of corn or other dead victual in any market, and sell-
ing it again in the same market, or within four miles of the place; for this also
enhances the price of the provisions, as each successive seller must have a success-
ive profit.
‘This act of 6th April 1802 provides, that ‘it shall and may be lawful for any
person or persons to sell or expose to sale provisions, vegetables or fruit, in the
markets of any city, borough or corporate town within this commonwealth: Provided
always, That such provisions, vegetables or fruit shall not have been previously
purchased within the limits of such city, borough or corporate town.’’?
There is no law which prevents any person buying any quantity of a commodity
at any price that he likes, whether to use himself, or to sell again in gross or by
retail, or to give away, or to prevent another having it; provided always that he.
do not commit the common-law offence of forestalling, regrating or engrossing, and
make no false representation in order to effect the purchase.
12 Y. 443. Lewis’ Cr. L. 126.. 8 2 Chit. Cr. L. 527. 1 Hast P. C. 143.
2 2 Clark 171, 9 4 BI. Com. 158.
318. & R.173. 10 2 Chit. Cr. L. 527.
4 Ibid. 174, 11 4 Bl. Com. 158. 3
® 2 Luz. L. Obs. 83. And see 41 Leg. Int. 104, 12 Purd. 1294. See 1 Phila. 338.
6 4 Bl. Com. 158. 3 Eng. L. & Eq. 46.
73 Eng. L. & Eq. 46.
[ 412 }
scape.
I. Provisions of the Penal Code. III. Warrant against a constable for an escape,
II. Judicial decisions.
J. Aor 31 Marcu 1860. Purd. 502.
Seor. 8. If any person arrested and imprisoned, charged with an indictable
offence, shall break prison, or escape, or shall break prison, although no escape be
actually made, such person shall be guilty uf a misdemeanor, and, on conviction,
be sentenced to undergo an imprisonment, by separate or solitary confinement at
labor, not exceeding two years, if the criminal charge on which such person stood
committed, was a crime or misdemeanor punishable on conviction, by imprisonment
by separate or solitary confinement at labor; or to imprisonment not exceeding one
year, if such charge was a crime or misdemeanor punishable on conviction, by
simple imprisonment without labor. 1f any prisoner imprisoned in any penitentiary
or jail, upon a conviction for a criminal offence, other than murder in. the first
degree, or where the sentence is for imprisonment for life, shall break such peni-
tentiary or jail, although no escape be actually made by him, such person shall be
guilty of a misdemeanor, and, upon conviction of said offence, shall be sentenced to
undergo an imprisonment, to commence from the expiration of his original sentence,
of the like nature, and for a period of time not exceeding the original sentenee, by
virtue of which he was imprisoned, when he so broke prison and escaped, or broke
prison, although no actual escape was made by him.
Szot. 4. If any person shall aid or assist a prisoner, lawfully committed or
detained in any jail for any offence, to make or to attempt to make his escape
therefrom, although no escape be actually made, or if any person shall convey, or
cause to be delivered, to such prisoner, any disguise, instrument or arms proper to
facilitate the escape of such prisoner, although no escape or attempt to escape be
actually made, he shall, on conviction, be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and
be sentenced to undergo an imprisonment, by separate or solitary confinement at
labor, or by simple imprisonment, not exceeding two years. And if any person shall
aid or assist any prisoner to escape, or attempt to escape from the custody of any
sheriff, constable, officer or other person who shall have the lawful charge of such
prisoner, every person so offending, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and, on
conviction, be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars, and to
undergo an imprisonment, by separate or solitary confinement at labor, or simple
imprisonment, as the court may direct, not exceeding two years.
Szor. 5. If any sheriff, coroner, keeper of any jail, constable or other officer,
having any offender, convicted or accused of any crime, in his lawful custody for
such crime, shall voluntarily permit or suffer such offender to escape and go at
large, every such sheriff, coroner, keeper of jail, constable or other officer so offend-
ing, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and, on conviction, be sentenced to pay a fine
not exceeding five hundred dollars, and to undergo an imprisonment, by separate or
solitary confinement at labor, or by simple imprisonment, not exceeding five years,
and shall, moreover, by the said sentence, be dismissed from office.
Sxcr. 6. If any keeper, jailer, sheriff or other officer having a prisoner in his
custody or charge, under a criminal conviction, sentence or charge, shall suffer such
prisoner, through gross negligence, to escape, he shall be guilty of a misdemeanor,
and, on conviction, be sentenced to an imprisonment not exceeding one year, and
to pay a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars.
Stor. 7. If any sheriff, corover, or keeper of a jail, constable, or other officer,
shall wilfully, and without reasonable cause, refuse to execute any lawful process,
directed to him, requiring the apprehension or confinement of any person charged
with, or convicted of, a criminal offence; or shall wilfully, and without reasonable
cause, omit to execute such process, by which such person shall escape, he shall be
guilty of a misdemeanor, and, on conviction, be sentenced to an imprisonment not
exceeding two years, and a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars.
ESCAPE. 413
/
Aor 10 June 1885. Purd. 503.
Szor. 1. It shall be lawful for the judges of the courts of oyer and terminer,
quarter sessions and general jail delivery of this commonwealth, to sentence any
prisoner who may be convicted of jail-breaking or attempting to break jail, to
the proper penitentiary, for said offence, and to add to said sentence for jail-breaking,
or attempting to break jail, a further sentence to the said penitentiary for the
remainder of the term which the said prisoner was serving at the time of his or
her escape.
Sxcr. 2. Whenever a sentence to the penitentiary for the remainder of a term
of imprisonment as aforesaid shall be imposed by the judges of the aforesaid
courts, said sentence shall release the prisoner on whom it may be imposed from
serving the remainder of the term which he or she was serving in such prison at
the time of his or her escape.
II. A violent or privy evasion out of some lawful restraint, as when a man is
arrested or imprisoned, and gets away before he is delivered by due course of law,
is an escape.*
In civil actions the sheriff [or constable] is to answer for an escape? A consta-
ble is liable for an escape, without proof of negligence or misconduct on his part?
An action against a constable for an escape is not within the limitation of the act
of 1772.4
A prisoner in execution shall not be allowed to go out of the jail, or if he goes
out, though he returns again, itis an escape. The sheriff is bound to keep him in
safe and strict custody ; and if he allow the prisoner to go-at large for the shortest
time, without the plaintiff's consent, he is liable.®
To allow a prisoner in execution the liberty of the jail-yard is not an escape.
But if the prisoner escape from the jail-yard, the sheriff can avail himself of nothing
as a matter of defence, but an act of God or of the common enemy. It is not a
sufficient answer to an action against a sheriff for an escape, that the jail and jail-
yard are defective and insufficient to keep the prisoners.”
If a jailer suffer a prisoner to escape without the sheriff’s knowledge, and the
sheriff be thereby made responsible, the jailer is liable to him in an action on
the case; nor will it relieve the jailer from liability, that he took advice and acted
with good faith in the matter.®
After an escape, the sheriff may himself retake the defendant, unless the escape
were with his permission ;* but in the latter case, he cannot arrest or detain him
without new process.’® In civil cases, the sheriff may re-arrest after a negligent,
but not after a voluntary, escape; in criminal cases, he may arrest after either.
Wherever a person is lawfully arrested, and afterwards escapes, the doors of a
house may be broken open to take him, on refusal of admittance.”
In an action on the case against a sheriff [or constable] for an escape, the measure
of damages is the actual loss which the plaintiff has sustained; hence, it is compe-
tent for the defendant to prove that the defendant in the execution was insolvent
at the time of his escape ; but in an action of debt, the plaintiff is entitled to recover
the amount of his judgment and execution.* If an action of escape be brought in
debt, the jury, if they find for the plaintiff, must find the whole debt and custs ; but
if brought in case, they may find such damages as they think proper."
In an indictment for a voluntary escape, it is unnecessary to allege, that the
defendant knew the person or persons escaping to be guilty.®
Ifa party imprisoned upon an indictment found, or upon a regular commitment
under the hand and seal of a justice of the peace, break prison and escape, he is
guilty of a misdemeanor, under the act of 1860; and that without his being
indicted, tried or convicted of the principal offence. A refusal to prosecute, or a
1 Termes de la Ley 321. See 3 Y. 180. 9 Barnes 373, 2 T. R. 25.
2 Bull. N. P. 59. 19 2 Johns. Cas. 3.
BAW. 215. 11 59 Penn. St. 320. See 1 Gr. 187.
48 Penn. St. 405. 12 2 Hawk. P. C. 187.
5 2 Inst. 360, 381. 135 W.& 8.455. 3 Penn. St. 269.
§ 59 Penn. St. 320. 78 Ibid. 396. 1443Y.17. 4 Ibid. 47. 7S. & R. 273. 3 Penn
72 P. & W. 167. St. 269. 2 Greenl. Evid. ¢ 265.
35 W. 141. 15 29 Penn. St. 445
414 EVIDENCE.
return of ignoramus by the grand jury for the principal offence, is no acquittal ;
nor is it any bar to an indictment for breaking prison, whatever might be the effect
of an acquittal by ajury |
III. WARRANT AGAINST A CONSTABLE FOR AN ESCAPE.
MONTOUR COUNTY, ss.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To the Constable of N—— Township, in the county of Montour, greeting :
Wuerzas, a certain A. B., of N —— township aforesaid, tailor, was on the lst day of
May, a. v. 1860, at N-—— aforesaid, charged, on oath, before J. R., one of our justices
of the peace in and for the said county, with stealing sundry goods and chattels from the
house of T. R., of G—— aforesaid, store-keeper [or as the offence may be]. Whereupon
our said justice did then and there make a certain warrant, under his hand and seul, in
due form of law, directed to C. D., constable of R—— township, in the said county,
requiring him to bring the body of the said A. B. before our said justice, to answer the
said charge, which warrant was then and there delivered to the said constable, at R
township aforesaid, to be executed; and whereas, complaint has been made, on oath,
before our said justice, that the said C. D., constable as aforesaid, did, by virtue of the
said warrant, on the same day and year aforesaid, at G aforesaid, take and arrest
the body of the said A. B., and him in his custody for the said offence had, but not
regarding the duty of his office in that behalf, unlawfully and negligentiy did permit the
said A. B. to escape and go at large, out of the custody of him, the said C. D., to the great
hindrance of justice, and in contempt of our laws. You are therefore hereby commanded
forthwith to take the said C. D. and bring him before the said J. R., to answer the pre-
mises, and further to be dealt with according to law. Witness the said J. R., as N——
aforesaid, the 20th day of May, a. p. 1885.
J. R., Justice of the Peace. [szan.]
Ebidence.
I. General rules of evidence. VII. Handwriting.
II. Of written evidence. VIII. Hearsay.
III. Parol evidence. IX. Witnesses.
IV. Book-entries and accounts. X. When a party to a suit may be a witness.
V. Of accounts. XI. Miscellaneous cases.
VI. Depositions, how to be taken.
J. GENERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE.
EVIDENCE signifies that that which demonstrates, makes clear, or ascertains the
truth of the very fact or point in issue, either on the one side or the other; and no
evidence ought to be admitted to any other point? To be admissible, it must have
relevancy to the issue, and tend to prove it; if the inference attempted to be drawn
be too remote and conjectural, it cannot be received.? Evidence which ought not
to influence the jury should be excluded from their consideration ;* but if a piece
of evidence have any bearing on the question in issue, it is competent ;* it is not
incompetent, merely because inconclusive.® Testimony in itself inconclusive, derives
a conclusive quality from the neglect of the defendant to explain it, if within his
power to do so.”
The general rule is, that the best evidence in the power of the party must
be produced ;° that is, the best evidence which the nature of the case admits of”
The rule does not require the strongest possible evidence of the matter in dispute:
but only that no evidence shall be given which, from the nature of the transac-
1 2 Ash. 61. And see 1 Brewst. 422. W.181, 1 Whart, 227. 3 Ibid. 34. 3 Penn. St.
2 3 Bl. Com. 367. 179, 239. 12 Ibid. 168. 32 Ibid. 111. 35 Ibid.
8 31 N. ¥.67. 2 ¥.95. 118. & RB. 267. 14 308. 42 Ibid. 402. 51 Ibid. 514. 58 Ibid. 463.
Ibid. 195. 1 P.& W. 220. 3 W.456. 4 Ibid. 66 Ibid. 196. 69 Ibid. 53.
165. 3 Penn. St. 44. 42 Ibid. 402. 9 Wall. 726. 6 35 N. Y.49. 15 Wall. 539.
42 P.&4 W. 482. 3 Whart. 26. 10 Ponn. St. T 17 Pitts. L. J. 116.
488. 42 Ibid. 402, ‘ 8 Add. 48, 168. &R. 89. 24 Penn. St. 314.
5468, &R, 203. 5 Ibid. 227. 10 Ibid. 27. 3 9 4 Binn. 326,
EVIDENCE. 415
tion, supposes there is better evidence of the fact attainable by the party ;! evi-
dence is not deemed secondary, unless it carry with it an indication that better
remains behind? The rule that excludes secondary evidence in a contest with
primary, does not mean that everything is secondary which is not of the highest
grade of proof, but only that which discloses the existence of other evidence, the
non-production of which may be supposed to be, on the ground that, if produced,
it would work against the party offering it. Secondary evidence is not admissible
when primary evidence is in the power of the party, even in mitigation of damages.
Where positive and direct evidence is not to be looked for, the proof of circum-
stances and facts consistent with the claim of one party and inconsistent with that
of the other, is deemed sufficient to presume the particular fact which is the sub-
jest of controversy. Long and undisputed possession of any right, or property,
affords a presumption that it had a legal foundation, and, rather than disturb men’s
possessions, even records have been presumed. So, if a landlord gives a receipt for
rent due at one time, and afterwards claims rent due at a time preceding, it fur-
nishes a strong presumption that such preceding rent has been paid; and where a
stale demand is made, the very circumstance of its coming late, in all cases inclines
the mind to suspect that it has not a just foundation, and in many has been taken
as complete evidence of the non-existence or payment of it; but these cases resting
on presumption, and not on positive proof, very slight evidence is suffivient to rebut
and overturn them, and to call on the different parties to establish their respective
rights by the ordinary rules of evidence.’ Circumstantial evidence is, in the abstract,
nearly, if not quite so strong as positive ; in the concrete, it may be much stronger.®
But to convict on circumstantial evidence, each fact in the chain ought to be proved
by distinct, independent and competent testimony; each should be consistent with
the other, and with the main fact sought to be established ; the inferences to be
drawn should be natural and reasonable, and to a moral certainty, certain ones ;
and the hypothesis of guilt must be such as to exclude every reasonable or fair
theory of innocence.” Where circumstantial evidence is relied on to prove a fact,
the circumstances must be proved, and not themselves presumed ; no presumption
can be drawn from a presumption.® And circumstances must be of a controlling
and irresistible nature, to justify a disregard of positive testimony.®
As a general rule, it is not competent to give evidence of other acts and offences
of the accused, to establish the main charge; but to this rule there are certain
exceptions. The case of fraud is among the few exceptions to the rule; on ques-
tions of intent to defraud, other acts similar to the offence charged, done at or about
the same time, or when the same motive to offend may reasonably be supposed to
have existed as that which is in issue, are admissible with a view to the quo animo.”
But the transactions must be so connected in point of time, and so similar in their
other relations, that the same motive may reasonably be imputed to them all. It is
uot necessary, however, that the means of accomplishing each fraud should be the
same. Where the question is, whether goods have been procured by a fraudulent
suppression of facts material to credit given, it will be competent to prove that, in
other instances, they have been obtained by actual misrepresentation concerning
the same facts. The concealment in one case, and false representation in the other,
are evidence merely of a fraudulent design, common to both transactions, of pro-
curing goods without the ability or the intention to pay for them." Whenever the
intent or guilty knowledge of a party is material to the issue, collateral facts, tending
to establish such intent or knowledge, are proper evidence.”
The rule is the same in criminal prosecutions: thus, on an indictment for utter-
ing counterfeit coin, to prove a guilty knowledge, evidence may be given of a
subsequent uttering by the prisoner of counterfeit coin of a different denomination
to that mentioned in the indictment.!® So, the passing of other counterfeit notes is
16 Pet. 352. 7 Ibid. 99. 12 Ibid. 1. 14 Ibid. 8 35 Penn. St. 440. 37 Ibid. 45.
431 9 1 Paine 129.
248, & R. 551. 10 17 W.N. 0.24. And seo cases collected in
3 87 Penn. St. 93. Bright. Dig. 998, 3249.
49 Johns. 45. 10 Ibid. 248, 11°18 N. Y¥, 589. And see 23 How. 172. 7 Wall.
5 Peake’s Evid. 13. 1 Greenl. Evid. 2 33-48, 132. 13 Ibid. 456.
6 4 Penn. St. 269. 9 Cr. 71. 5 McLean 514. 12 1 Story 135. Ibid. 421. 2 Paine 200. 7 BL
713 Phila. 427. And see 2 Cliff. 295. 3 W. C. C. 469,
€.C. 146. 2 Bi. C. C. 207, 13 Dears, C. C. 456.
A16 EVIDENCE.
evidence of guilty knowledge! And on the trial of an indictment for conspiracy
to defraud, evidence that the defendant obtained goods from other persons, by
similar means, is admissible to show the quo animo.? On the trial of an indict-
ment for false-pretences, evidence of similar offences, committed at other times, is
competent, to show the criminal intent.’ So also, on the charge of receiving stolen
goods, with a guilty knowledge, other acts of receiving, not so far removed in point
of time or circumstance from the specific act charged in the indictment, as to
constitute a totally distinct transaction, may be given in evidence to establish such
guilty knowledge.* And so, on a trial for arson, the prosecution may show a sub-
sequent attempt, by the prisoner, to burn the same property, two days afterwards.®
Such evidence is admissible, even in a capital case: as, where two persons were
murdered, at the same time and place, under circumstances indicating that both
murders were committed by the same person, evidence of the circumstances of
the murder of one was held admissible, on the trial for the murder of the other.®
And on the trial of an indictment for the murder of the prisoner’s wife by
poison (arsenic), evidence that the mother of the deceased came to her death, a
few days before, by arsenic, administered by the prisoner, whilst prescribing for
her, and while she was residing in the same house, that the arsenic administered to
both was of the same description, and that it was given in pursuance of a design
on the part of the prisoner to obtain their property, was properly admitted. In
short, evidence of the commission of another crime by the prisoner, is competent,
wherever it is relevant and material on the question of his guilt, of the crime for
which he is on trial.
The admissions of a party are evidence against him, though made after suit
brought.® An admission against interest is evidence against the party of the ex-
istence of the fact admitted ; but an offer to compromise, not accepted, is not
evidence, as an admission" The admission, however, of an independent fact,
though made in an offer of compromise, is evidence.!? The whole of a defendant’s
admission must be taken together, unless there be circumstances which render im-
probable what he says in avoidance of a conceded fact.® But, in general, where the
declarations of a party are proved against him, what he says in his own favor, at
the same time is competent, but not.conclusive, evidence in his favor.“ If the
defendant, on the cross-examination of the plaintiff as a witness, bring out a portion
of a conversation between the parties, the plaintiff is entitled to give the whole of
it in evidence.’® It is competent, however, for him to disprove them.
On the trial of a capital case, evidence of a motive for the commission of the
erime is always admissible.”
IL. OF WRITTEN EVIDENCE.
Evidence by records and writings, is where acts of assembly, judgments, proceed-
ings of courts, deeds, &c., are admitted as evidence. A record may be proved by
its production, or by a copy. Copies of records are either exemplifications, copies
made by an authorized officer, or sworn copies. HExemplifications are copies under
the great seal or under the seal of some particular court, which seals prove them-
110. H. Reo. 46. Ibid. 49. 267. 61 Ibid. 202. 64 Ibid. 454,
2 6 Ibid. 43. 2 Wheeler’s C. Cas. 256. 10 33 Penn. St. 307.
84 Am. L. J. 507. And see 3 Hun 40;8s.c. "38. & R. 295. 28 Penn. St. 236,
60 N. Y. 616. 12 2 Penn. St. 182. 28 Ibid. 236. 12 Pet. 84.
4 3 Leg. Gaz. 336. 8 Phila. 615. 89 Penn. St. 1 Dall. 240. Ibid. 392. 6S. & R. 833. 3
480. . W. & 8.127. 57 Penn. St. 397.
© 76 Penn, St, 319. 16 87 Penn, St
enn. St. 7 enn. St. 376. \ 5 .
7 106 Ibid. 477; 8. 0. 99 Ibid. 398, 16 7 Penn. St. oe pee Ron ete
§ 83 N. Y. 418. 11-78 Ibid. 185. 84 Ibid. 107, 187. 85 Ibid.
® 1 Dall. 64. 6 W. 126. 7 Ibid. 552. 8W.& 139. 88 Ibid. 291. 91 Ibid. 57.
8.420. 7 Penn. St. 307. 24 Ibid. 154. 59 Ibid.
EVIDENCE. 417
selves. Where the law intrusts a particular officer with the making of copies, it
gives credit to them in evidence, without further proof.
Not only records but all public documents which cannot be removed from one
place to another, may be evidence, by a copy proved on oath to have been examined
with the original. Records and enrolments prove themselves, and a copy of a record
or enrolment sworn to, may be given in evidence. An office paper taken out of
the files by one who has no connection with it, and produced in court, cannot be
given in evidence; it must be produced and authenticated by the proper officer, in
whose custody it was.®
A copy of the laws published annually by the authority of the legislature, is
evidence of the statutes contained in it, whether they be public or private A
printed copy of an act of assembly, published under the authority of the legislature
of another state, may be read in evidence.® ,
Foreign laws cannot be judicially noticed, but must be proved as facts; and in
making such proof, the general principle is applicable, that the best evidence the
nature of the case admits of must be given. But this rule may be relaxed, or
changed, as necessity, either physical or moral, may require; and where a rigid
adherence to it may produce extreme inconvenience and manifest injustice.
Tn all suits or causes -* ** «* "" be necessary for either party to give in evi-
dence the prore*” 3s had before a justice or justices of the peace or alderman of
any ot’ ace, a transcript of the docket, proceedings or record of the said justice
or justices or alderman, certified by the same, respectively, and verified by the
certificate of the clerk or prothonotary of a court of record in the city or county
wherein the said justice or alderman has jurisdiction, under the seal of the court,
setting forth the official character and authority of the said justice or alderman,
attested by the judge thereof, shall be legal evidence of the judgment entered in
such case.’
Subscribing witnesses are not necessary to the validity of a deed,® and therefore,
if there be none, or the subscribing witness being called, denies having seen the
instrument executed ;° or it appears that the name of a fictitious person is put as a
witness, by the party himself who executed the deed ;” or the person really attesting
is, at the time of the execution of the deed, interested in it, and continue so at
the time of the trial; in these cases, proof of the handwriting of the party will be
sufficient.
Anu agreement or deed, under which land has been occupied and claimed for up-
wards of thirty years, may be given in evidence, without proof of its execution, by
the subscribing witnesses." The record of a deed, as contained upon the record-
book, brought into court in the county in which it belongs, is legal evidence.# A
deed so acknowledged or proven as to be properly admitted to record, is admissible
in evidence, without further proof of execution.”
Parol evidence, in general, is esteemed secondary in its nature to written evidence.
Thus, where an agreement has been reduced into writing, the writing must be pro-
duced.* Generally, whenever an original writing is of’ a public nature, and would
be evidence, if produced, an immediate sworn copy thereof will be evidence ; but
where an original writing is of a private nature, a copy is not evidence, unless the
original is lost or destroyed.™ If a man destroys a thing that is designed to be
evidence against himself, a small matter will supply it, and therefore, the defendant
1 Bull. N. P. 229.
2 Co. Litt. 117, 262.
3 9 W. 311.
46 Binn. 321. 2 W. & S. 156, And see 3
Whart. 481. 80 Penn. St. 208.
6128. &R. 203. 2 Penn. St. 85. |
JO W. 158. 1 R. 386. 1 Greenl. Evid.
3 486-8.
7 Act 29 March 1860. Purd. 821. The act 12
March 1869 provides, that the aldermen of Phila-
delphia and Lancaster shall have public official
seals, with which they shall authenticate all their
acts, instruments and attestations; and that
their official acts, so certified, shall be received
in evidence of the facts therein certified, in all
suits, without a further certificate of their official
27
character. For this service, they are allowed a fee
of twenty-five cents. Purd. 1125. See 3 Brewst.
540. And see act 17 April 1869, validating prior
acknowledgments under their private seals.
Pamph. 1144,
8 1 Lev. 25. 18. & RB. 72.
9 Peake 146. 1 Doug. 205. 1 W. BI. 365.
10 Peake 23, 5 T. R, 371.
i111 W. & S. 533, 5 Penn. St. 492. 56 Ibid.
132. 57 Ibid. 13. 67 Ibid. 185.
12-10 W. 67.
18 4 Penn. St. 13. 5 Gilm. 376.
14 3 Hsp.213. 3 Y.271. Add. 390. 18.&R
27. 4W. 218. 38W.&S8.291. 6 Ibid. 564,
16 3 Salk. 154. 3 Y.529. 3 W.&S. 45.
418 EVIDENCE.
having torn his own note signed by him, a copy sworn was admitted to be good
evidence to prove it.’ :
The docket-entry, upon proof of the loss of the other part of the record, is com-
petent evidence ; and parol evidence may be given of the contents of that part of
the record which is lost.? : dal
In the case of private deeds or other instruments, the production of the original,
if in existence, and in the power of the party using it, is always required; till this
is done, no evidence whatever of the contents can be received; but where the
original has been destroyed, or lost by accident; or being in the hands of the ad-
verse party, notice has been given him to produce it, then an examined copy, or
even parol evidence of the contents, being the best evidence in the power of the
party, is received; it being first proved, in case a copy is offered, that the original
of which it purports to be a copy was a genuine instrument.’ :
The preliminary proof necessary to admit secondary evidence of the existence
and execution of a lost deed, must be based on the acts and declarations of the
party whose title is to be affected by such evidence. Before secondary evidence
can be given of a lost deed, it is necessary to prove that it was executed and
delivered, and if the person whose title is to be affected by it was not named in the
deed, and did not sign it, that such person was in some way a party to the deed.
Proof of diligent search and inquiry by the proper custodian, is sufficient to let in
‘secondary evidence of the contents of a lost document, unless it be traced to other
hands.5
A receipt is not conclusive evidence against the party signing it, but he may
show that he did not receive the sum or thing in question.® A receipt in full is
prima facie evidence of a settlement; but not conclusive ;’ it is always open to
explanation ;° so, if obtained by misrepresentation?®
Tn an action against a justice of the peace by a parent, to recover the penalty for
marrying’ his minor son, the entry in the family Bible of the son’s birth, proved by
the oath of the plaintiff, is competent evidence of the minority of the son.” An
entry, in 1811, in the handwriting of the pastor of a church, in a book kept in the
church as a registry of baptisms and births, the object of which entry was to register
the baptism of a person and not his birth, and in which the time of the birth was
introduced merely by way of description, is not evidence of the date of the birth.”
The practice of admitting an account sworn to by the plaintiff as conclusive evi-
dence against the defendant, is not only illegal, but highly unreasonable and dan-
gerous, as it gives to the dishonest man a power over his neighbor’s purse totally
incompatible with every rule of equity or justice. However convenient to the
plaintiff, or whatever facility in the transaction of business it may afford to the jus-
tice, the practice, if it has prevailed, ought to be discontinued. And indeed
proceedings of justices founded upon such practice are invariably set aside by courts
of justice.??
A paper handed, upon request, to the opposite counsel, and inspected by him,
does not, in consequence thereof, become evidence for both parties.®
A memorandum proved by a witness, who can swear to no more than that it was
accurately made by him, at the time, to perpetuate his memory of the fact, is com-
petent evidence.*
A witness may testify as to his belief of the date of an occurrence, after having
refreshed his memory by a contemporaneous entry in his books, though he has ne
other recollection of the time.
1 Ld. Raym. 731. 6 Binn. 478. 7 Phila. 204.
210 W. 63. And see 2 R. 232. 10 10 W. 82.
810 Co. 92. 3 T.R. 151. 1 Str. 70,526. 1 15 W. &.S. 266.
Atk. 446. 10 Johns. 36% 12-2 Dall. 77, 114. 16 W. N.C. 495. But where
4 29 Penn. St. 375. such sworn copy is served with the summons it is
5 31 Ibid. 489. sufficient to authorize a judgment, unless denied
6 2T. R. 367. 38 Penn. St. 294. by affidavit of defence. Act 7 July 1879 @ 2.
1 57 Penn. St. 397, Purd, 1131,
8 38 Ibid. 294. 1368. & R. 293, 12 Ibid. 405.
® 35 Ibid. 245. But one who seeks torecover 4 3 Penn. St. 414,
against a receipt must make out his case clearly. 1 57 Ibid. 421.
EVIDENCE. . 419
IIL. Parou EVIDENCE, WHEN ADMITTED TO AFFECT A WRITTEN CONTRACT.
The general rule is, that parol evidence is admissible to explain, but not to con-
tradict, alter, add to, or diminish a written instrument. But the rule which forbids
parol evidence to be received, to contradict or vary a written agreement, has refer-
ence exclusively to the terms in which the writing is couched. The plain and
unequivocal terms of an agreement may not be altered by parol; but such explana-
tions of the subject-matter may be proved as will give those terms the effect intended
by the parties.?
Parol evidence is admissible to defeat a written instrument, on the ground of
fraud or mistake, or to apply it to its proper subject-matter ; or, in some instances,
as ancillary to such application, to explain the meaning of doubtful terms, or to
rebut presumptions arising extrinsically. In these cases, the parol evidence does
not usurp the place or arrogate the authority of written evidence, but either shows
that the instrument ought not to operate at all, or proves what is essential in order
to give the instrument its legal effect.
But parol evidence is not admissible to contradict or vary written instrument,
unless there has been fraud, accident or mistake in the creation of the instrument
itself, or unless there has been an attempt to make a fraudulent use of the instru-
ment, in violation of a promise or agreement made at the time the instrument was
signed, and without which it would not have been executed.* It is only where a
court of equity would reform the instrument, that parol evidence is admissible
to contradict it,®
Parol evidence is admissible to explain a latent ambiguity. So, parol evidence
of the understanding of the parties as to the construction of a written agreement,
may be given to explain a patent ambiguity.” It is always admitted, to explain a
receipt ;* or to show a different consideration from that expressed in a deed ;® or to
defeat or rebut a resulting trust. But it is inadmissible to vary the legal effect of
a contract of indorsement ;" or to turn an irregular indorsement into a guarantee.*
Nor can parol evidence be admitted of an agreement that a note should be renewed,
at maturity ;* or that it was only to be payable on a contingency, or that the maker
was not to be held liable on it.?*
As a preliminary to every question of the interpretation of a writing, it must be
proved or assumed that it is genuine and authentic; that it is free from fraud in its
creation; that the makers of it were competent; that the subject-matter of it is
lawful; and that it is executed according to law: and for these purposes, parol
evidence is proper, in order to put the instrument into the hands of the judge for
interpretation and construction. The judge must receive, by admissions, or by
testimony, all the information that is necessary, in order to put himself in a position
to interpret and construe the writing with intelligence : that is, to apply it to per-
sons, things and events, according to the intention under which it was written. He
must, as far as possible, place himself in the same circumstances of time and place,
as the author of the writing was when he wrote it.”
The evidence to establish a parol agreement, limiting the operation of a written
contract to a particular time, must be buth positive and clear.’° But though parol
evidence to reform a written instrument must be ‘clear, precise and indubitable,”
yet these words are to be accepted with their inherent limitations ; it is sufficient,
that it, carry conviction to the minds of the jurors, that the witnesses are credi-
ble, that the facts are distinctly remembered, that the details are exactly narrated,
and that their statements are true.” It must be such clear, precise and indubitable
14 Dall. 340. Pears. 537.
2 29 Penn. St. 92. 9 89 Penn. St. 114,
3 1 Bouv. Inst. 358 10 92 Ibid. 317.
4 106 Penn. St. 536. And see 7 Ibid. 117. 11 1 2W.N.C. 262. 3 Ibid. 44.
Thid, 233, 83 Ibid. 244, 100 Ibid. 527. . 12 4 Phila. 75. 5 Ibid. 38, 151. 2 Pears. 28, 30.
5 106 Penn. St. 536. 84 Penn. St. 274.
§ 30 Ibid. 398. 67 lbid. 108: 76 Ibid. 197. 18 52 Penn. St. 356. 73 Ibid.93. 76 Ibid. 273.
79W.9. Andsee8S.& R.402. 8 Penn. St. 14 13 Phila. 51. And see 10 W.N, 0. 483.
501. 80 Ibid. 363. 15 31 Penn. St. 252.
81 W.4&S. 321. 12 Penn. St. 235. 13 Ibid. 16 85 Penn. St. 329,
46. Ibid. 60. 15 Ibid. 128. 59 Ibid. 59. 1 17 89 Ibid. 314.
420 EVIDENCE.
evidence as would justify a chancellor in reforming the instrument on the ground of
fraud, accident or mistake.! : i
The rule which excludes parol evidence to contradict or vary a written instru-
ment only prevails in a contest between the parties to it; it does not apply to a
stranger.”
No defeasance to any deed for real estate regular and absolute upon its face, made
after the passage of this act, shall have the effect of reducing it to a mortgage, unless
the said defeasance is made at the time the deed is made and is in writing, signed,
sealed, acknowledged and delivered by the grantee in the deed to the grantor, and is
recorded in the office for the recording of deeds and mortgages in the county wherein
the lands are situated, within sixty days from the execution thereof; and such de-
feasances shall be recorded and indexed as mortgages by the recorder.*
IV. Boox-ENTRIES AND ACCOUNTS.
If a suit be founded on a book-account, and the defendant question the validity of
the demand, it is most assuredly the duty of the justice before whom the cause is de-
pending, to require of the plaintiff to produce his proofs of the existence of the debt.
If the subject of the action be goods sold and delivered, or work and labor done, in
the usual course of business, for the defendant, the plaintiff's day-book ought to be
produced. The book, accompanied by the oath or affirmation of the person who
made the entries (whether it was the plaintiff or his clerk), that the entries were truly
made,‘ at the times then specified, will not only be good evidence of the sale and de-
livery, but likewise of the value of the goods, or work done. if a price be put upon
them in the book. The book thus produced, and sworn to, must be the plaintiff's
original book of entries, and not a ledger, or transcript from the original; for the
strength of this evidence is derived from the absolute authenticity of the orignal en-
tries. The authenticity may be corroborated or diminished by the appearance of the
book itself; by the manner of the entries made against other persons; by the con-
sistency of the date, &c. The plaintiff's book being thus made competent (if I may
so speak) as a witness, must evidence its own credibility ; its credibility will rest upon
the fairness and regularity of the entries, unless it be reasonably accounted for ; and
interlineation, particularly with ink of a color different from that with which the body
of the entry was made; crowding more words into a smaller space than the general
handwriting of the book required, and the like, are circumstances of fraud which should
not only invalidate the specific entry under consideration, but perhaps destroy the
testimony of the book altogether.®
Books of original entries made by the party, and verified by his oath, are competent
evidence of goods sold and delivered, and work done, and of the prices; but not of
money lent or paid.” The book of original entries of a tradesman is not evidence of
the delivery of the goods to be sold on commission. A book of entries, verified on
oath, is not competent evidence of the delivery of goods under a previous contract,
for their delivery at different periods;°® nor of labor performed under a special con-
tract.!° Books of original entries are not evidence of the casual sale of an article not
in the course of the party’s business, and of which it is usual to take other proof or
evidence of sale: thus, a sale of a horse, by a dry-goods merchant or tradesman, would
not be evidence by an entry in his book of account.”
The book of original entries, although prima facie evidence of the prices of goods
sold, or work done, is not conclusive; either party may go into other proof of the
prices, and the judgment of the jury [or justice] is to be formed on the whole.” The
book of original entries of a physician is not conclusive as to the value of the services
ape : The jury [or justice] may make an abatement for unreasonable or excessive
charges.
1103 Penn. St. 37. 82 Whart. 33, 1 Y. 198.
21 Whart. 303, 21 Penn. St. 266. 910 W. 249.
3 Act 8 June 1881. Purd. 651. 10 26 Penn. St. 384,
41 Y. 321. 1 11 Ibid, 310-12.
5 Tbid. 347. 121 Y. 347. 59 Penn. St. 346,
6 Grayd. Just, 116-17. 1 Greenl. Evid. 3117. 182 Phila. 17. See 4 Clark 191,
71 Y. 347, 48.&R.3, 11 Penn, St. 242, 1
Smith’s Lead. Cas. 354.
EVIDENCE. 421
If the defendant be not the original debtor, but assume to pay the debt of
another, the entry in the plaintiff’s book, proved by his own oath, cannot be received
in evidence ; proof must be made by an indifferent witness, or by some instrument
of writing.!
Unconnected scraps of paper containing, as alleged, accounts of sales, by an agent,
of articles on account of his principal, irregularly kept on their face, are not admis-
sible as a book of original entries? A mutilated piece of paper, which appears to
have been torn out of a book in which the nawe neither of the plaintiff nor defend-
ant appears, which contains no charges against the defendant, and which is
unintelligible, without explanation by the plaintiff’, is not admissible in evidence as
a book of original entries.
A book purporting to be a book of original entries, containing entries of the sale
of goods made when the goods were ordered, but before they were delivered, is not
competent evidence of goods sold and delivered. Nor are arbitrary signs or marks
affixed to the entries of each article, not for the purpose of charging the defendant,
but of informing the porter, so as to prevent a second delivery of a similar article,
evidence of delivery, particularly when it appears that the signs or marks were not
always made by the person who made the charge, nor by the plaintiff, or a clerk in
his employ. Where a plaintiff makes an entry of goods sold, upon a card, with
pen and ink, and the same evening or the next day, transcribes the entries into a
book, the book is to be considered as the book of original entries of the plaintiff,
and may be read in evideuce to the jury; and the material on which the entry was
first written, or its size and shape, are indifferent.
In order to the validity of a book-entry as evidence, it must be a registry of a sale
and delivery, actually made, of the things therein contained at the time of their
being so entered. An entry on a card or slate is but a memorandum preparatory
to permanent evidence of the transaction which must be perfected, at or near the
time and in the routine of business. The entries ought tobe transferred the same
evening, or the next morning, and they ought in every instance to be so, in the
course of the succeeding day.”
The plaintiff, a blacksmith, to recover for work done, produced a book containing
entries, part of which he swore were made by himself, not later than the second day
in the evening after the work was done, and were partly taken from a slate and
partly from his own head—a witness was also produced, who testified that he made
some of the entries by copying them from the plaintiff’s slate on the evening of the
day on which they were made, or in the course of the next day: Held, that the book
was admissible in evidence.®
When a purchaser at a store selects the articles he wants, and has them set aside
to be sent for by him, or to be sent to him by the merchant, then is the time to
make the entry of a charge against the purchaser, and such entry is evidence.®
When goods are sold to be delivered at a distance, the proper time to make the
entry in the book is when they are loaded and started; and entries thus made are
competent evidence to prove the sale and delivery.” Original entries in a day-book,
in order to their validity as evidence of a charge, must be made,.as to time, in the
ordinary course of that business in which he is engaged who makes the charge. If
they be delayed over one day, they are not legal evidence to charge a defendant,
unless under peculiar circumstances."
If a servant in the course of delivering out goods to customers make memoranda,
and the same night, or next day, entries are made by the master in books, from these
memoranda, such books are books of original entries, and are admissible, accompanied
With the writer’s oath, as evidence to charge a customer.”
If a book appear, on inspection, or examination of the party by the court, not
to be a book of original entries, the court may reject it as incompetent. If this
11 7 14 W. 258,
° 128. & R. 126. 5 Bees a
4 R. 291. . .
4 Thid. 404. ¥ 5 Ibid. 377.
5 Thid. 408. lg W. 544.
8 4 W. 258. 2958. & R. 285
422 EVIDENCE.
does not clearly appear, it must be submitted to the jury [or the justice], to
decide on.!
In an action upon a book-account of a decedent, it is only necessary to prove that
they are books of original entry, to admit them to go to the jury as evidence, and
if evidence be afterwards given as to the time when the entries were made, this
must be referred, with the books, to the jury.2_ The handwriting of a plaintiff who
has made original entries of charge in a book, and who is absent from the state, may
be proved, and upon such proof the entries are admissible.2 And so in case of a
clerk (who has made the entries) temporarily absent from the state." ;
A book of original entries manifestly erased and altered in a material point, can-
not be considered as entitled to go to the jury as a book of original entries, and
ought to be rejected by the court, unless the party offering it give an explanation
which does away with the presumption arising from its face. :
The entry in a book of original entries must be original, but the elements which
composed it may have been reduced to writing previously ; the competency of such
entries made by a clerk, depends not on his own knowledge of their correctness, but
on the presumption that what he did in the course of his master’s business, was done
correctly.
The rule which admits shop-books in evidence is founded in necessity, and being
evidence made by the party himself, should be subjected to severe scrutiny. And,
therefore, when the books of a tradesman have acquired a general reputation for
inaccuracy, and through fraud or carelessness false entries have been made, and
true ones omitted, so frequently as to destroy the confidence of his customers in
himself and his books, there is no reason why credence should be given to them.
The general character of a deceased shopkeeper, who made the entries, for hon-
esty and correct book-keeping, is pertinent and proper testimony to discredit the
books." The book of original entries of a party claiming for goods sold, or work
and labor done, is not the best or only evidence of the claim, which may be proved
aliunde®
Though the act of 1869 has made the plaintiff a competent witness in his own
behalf, yet he is not so, in an action against the personal representatives of his
deceased debtor; and, therefore, in such cases, the foregoing rules of law are in
full force. Though the plaintiff is not a general witness in his own behalf, he may
prove his book of original entries as before the passage of the act ;* which has not
rendered any one incompetent as a witness, who was not so before its enactment.”
A book-account, containing charges of money lent to a decedent, is not evidence
against his estate.’
OF ACCOUNTS.
An account rendered to a party indebted, by his creditor, and not objected to in
a reasonable time, is prima facie evidence against the party to whom rendered.’
An account presented to a party indebted, by a creditor, and corrected by the
parties, is an account stated, and binding upon the representatives of the debtor, as
to items not objected to by the decedent.® A copy ofan account taken from a
book, from which a settlement had been made, was delivered to the party, and
retained five months without objection: Aeld, that a copy of that copy, and the
book from which it was taken, showing the same balance, were evidence.*
Even an account-current furnished by one party to the other, if not objected to in
a reasonable time, becomes a settled account.'® Where an account sales has been
rendered, and the consignor directs the balance to be shipped, making no objection
to the items of the account, he thereby assents to it, and makes it account stated."
It is the settled law-merchant, that an account rendered is allowed, if not objected
to without unnecessary delay; but the time within which objections must be made
cannot be definitely fixed ; it depends on the circumstances of the case.”
148. &R.,3. 1010 W. N.C. 446. 13 Ibid. 565.
21W.& S. 256. lL 2 Pears. 487.
8 Ws Th 22 30 Penn. St. 75.
42W. & S. 137. 13 36 Ibid. 156,
5 6 Whart. 146. 14 2 Ibid. 323.
6 2 Phila. 35. Bald. 536. 4W. & S. 109.
7 29 Penn. St. 257. 16 7 Penn. St. 281.
8 3 Whart. 75. W148 Thid. 228.
8 11 Phila. 100.
EVIDENCE. 423
Receiving an account rendered, without objection, does not preclude the party
from afterwards showing an unobserved error which passed without notice by the
common blunder of all parties. Such an error might be corrected even in a settled
account, where neither party had been prejudiced by the acquiescence.
The accounts exhibited by oné party to another, are evidence against him who
exhibits them, as to the articles which they contain, but not conclusive as to the
value of the items.’ Entries in a book of payments made for another may be
given in evidence, if accompanied with proof that the person had constant access
to the books, and assented to the entries.’
If, when one party calls for the other party’s books, but when they are produced
declines using them, the mere calling for them will not make them evidence for the
adverse party, even though they are inspected by the party who calls for them#
Whenever any evidence shall be required, in any civil suit or proceeding, in any
‘court of this commonwealth, from the book-entries of any bank or banker doing
business at the time of such requirement, it shall be competent, upon ten days’
written notice to the opposite party, to produce verified copies of such entries, which
shall be received in all legal proceedings as prima facie evidence of such book-
entry or entries ; and a bank-officer or banker shall not be compelled to produce
the original book or attend as a witness thereto, unless a party to the record shall
file an affidavit that injustice will likely be done, unless the original book is
produced ®
To warrant such copy as provided for in the foregoing section, there must be an
affidavit or the testimony of an officer of the bank, stating that the book is one of:
the ordinary books of the bank used in the transaction of its business, that the
entry is as was originally made at the time of its date, and in the usual course of
its business, that there are no interlineations or erasures, that the book is in its
custody and control, and that the copy has been compared with the book and is a
correct copy of the same; and such book shall be open to the inspection of any
interested party. Provided, That the provisions of this act shall not apply to
any suit to which the bank or banker is a party.7
VI. DEpositions, HOW TO BE TAKEN UNDER A RULE.
A deposition is the testimony of a witness, called a deponent, and put down in
writing, to interrogatories exhibited [or questions asked], for that purpose, in courts
of equity [or iaw]; and the copies of such depositions, regularly taken and pub-
lished, are read, as evidence, at the hearing of the cause.®
The necessity of issuing rules to take the depositions of witnesses, is caused by
their residing at a distance from the place where the cause is to be tried. A. sues
B. in the county of Allegheny. The cause is expected to be tried at the
term of the court of common pleas to be holden in Pittsburgh. C., the attorney
of A., makes application to the court, and obtains a rule to take the depositions of
witnesses in Philadelphia, :to be read when the cause shall be tried. C., having
obtained the rule, sends notice to the attorney of B., or to B. himself, as the law, or
the practice, may require, of the time and place at which he purposes to examine the
witnesses. A notice in the following form will answer this purpose :
“A. vs. B. In the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, No. 2. To. B., the
defendant :—Sir, you are hereby notified, that under a rule of court, of which the above
is a copy, depositions will be taken, in said cause, between the hours of 9 a.m. and 5 P. M.,
on the 19th day of June, a. p. 1885, at the office of J. B., Magistrate, No. 36 South Sixth
street, in the city of Philadelphia, before the said J. B., or some other magistrate of said
city. C., Attorney for the Plaintiff.
To B., the defendant. Pittsburgh, June 4th, 1885.”
If application, for that purpose, be made to the magistrate, before the rule is to
be executed, he should issue subpaenas for the witnesses. If they do not attend, he
has a right, on application, and due proof that the subpenas were personally served,
13 -W. & S. 109. 5 Act 22 June 1883 3 1. Purd. 824.
2 1 Dall. 147, 6 Ibid. ; 2.
28 W. 39. Tbid. 3 3.
475. & BR. 10, 8 Pract. Att’y 234,
\
i
424 EVIDENCE.
to issue an attachment, give it to the constable, and compel the attendance of the
witnesses, as in other cases.1 The parties and witnesses being in attendance, and
ready to proceed to the execution of the rule, the magistrate should write, at the
top of a sheet of paper, a heading of the following, or a similar character :
“ Depositions of witnesses produced, sworn [or affirmed], and examined, at the office
of J. B., one of the magistrates of the city of Philadelphia, No. 36 South Sixth street, in
said city, on the 19th day of June, a. p. 1885, between the hours of 9 4. M. and 5p. m.,
of said ‘day, in obedience to the rule of court, and notice, hereto attached, to be read in a
cause depending in the court of common pleas of Allegheny county, No. 2, in which A
is plaintiff and B. defendant.”
Having sworn or affirmed the witness, in the usual manner, counsel, or the
parties, or their agents, will, if there be no interrogatories filed, proceed to the exami-
nation, and cross-examination of the witness. Where there are interrogatories
filed, let the justice, previously to reading the interrogatories, note on the sheet of
paper on which he is about to write the answers of the witness, a short heading, in
these, or similar words—“ To the first interrogatory on the part of the plaintiff the
witness answers”—[inserting the answer of the witness]; and so proceed, with
every interrogatory, or with the examination, until every question shall be answered,
and the answers committed to paper. Care should be taken that a return be made
to every interrogatory.
The writer, from some experience, recommends to the justice, who shall commit
the examination to writing, on all occasions, to take down, as nearly as may be, ali the
witness may say, and in the very words of the witness. If he wish to correct any-
thing he may have said, let the correction also be committed to paper in the
words of the witness. Much, very much, may depend upon the turn of an expres-
sion, or the placing of one word before, or after, another. It is better to allow the
witness to correct his statements, and to change his words, than to erase some
words, and insert others. The witness, in correcting himself, in speaking in his
own words, in giving his recollections as they present themselves, is brought more
freshly, and more truly, before the court than he could be by erasures and inser-
tions. The trust confided to justices, in the examination of witnesses under a rule
of court, and committing the language of the witnesses to paper, is a very important
one; and he will best. discharge it, who shall labor most diligently and successfully
to bring the witness, in all his peculiarities of language, most faithfully before the
court, so that, as far as possible, his deposition shall make the same impression upon
those who hear it read, as the witness himself’ would make, if he were personally
present, orally delivering his testimony.
If there shall be any paper produced, in relation to which the witness shall be
examined, let it be marked thus: A. ‘The witness being shown the paper marked
A, hereto attached, deposes and says,”’ &. Before attaching the paper, write on
it thus—‘ This is the paper A, referred to this day, June 19th, 1885, by the wit-
ness, H. M., on his examination before J. B., Magistrate.’
The examination being finished, let the witness subscribe his name at the foot
of it; if he cannot write, let him put his mark. All the papers being arranged and
attached to the examination, and the rule of court and notice, the alderman should,
at the foot of it, give a certificate in the form following :—“ I certify that the above
witnesses were duly qualified and examined at the time and place stated in the
caption, and subscribed their depositions in my presence. Before J. B., Magistrate,
Phila., June 19, 1885.5 The whole of the papers should be put under an envel-
ope, and addressed to the prothonotary of the court from whence the rule issued,
and directed to the county town of the proper county where the office of the pro-
thonotary is kept.
A rule to take depositions implies, without being so expressed in it, that they are
to be taken before a judge or justice of the peace.‘
A notice to take depositions should have sufficient certainty as to time and place
to enable the opposite party to attend, without any extraordinary search. Deposi-
tions taken ex parte, under a rule of court, after the hours named in the rule,
1 Act 26 February 1831. Purd. 813. 458. & R. 246,
2 See 7 W. & S. 398-4, 5 3 Binn. 139. 16 Penn. St. 305,
8 See 15 Penn. St. 51.
EVIDENCE. 425
cannot be read; but, if the opposite party, having notice, did not attend at the
hour, they may.!’ The person before whom depositions are to be taken, has no
power to adjourn from time to time, without consent and without notice. It is
irregular to give a notice to take a deposition upon two days, although they be con-
secutive.® Otherwise, when there are many witnesses to be examined.*
Notice of the taking of a deposition, served on the attorney in the cause, is good
unless he object at the time of service. A deposition taken in pursuance of a rule
of court cannot be read in evidence, unless it appear by the certificate of the justice,
that it was taken at the time and place mentioned in the notice °
It must particularly appear when and where the depositions were taken."
The witness should be sworn before his testimony is reduced to writing, but if
the party, being present, make no objection before the justice, it will be considered
as waived.®
If the deposition be ex parte, it must appear that it was taken before a person
duly qualified to administer an oath, either officially or by delegation from the court.®
The letters “J. P.”’ subjoined to the name of the persou before whom a deposition
is taken, are a sufficient designation of his official character as a justice of the
eace.!
r A party who attends and cross-examines witnesses, on a short rule to take deposi-
tions, waives all objections to the sufficiency of the notice." A cross-examination,
under a rule of court, does not prevent objection, afterwards, to the competency of
the witness."? But objectious to leading questions must be taken at the time of the
examination.’® :
The rule of court is, that the depositions shall be taken before a justice. It ought,
therefore, to be reduced to writing, from the mouth of the witness, in the presence
of the justice, though it need not be drawn by him.“ It is not competent for the
justice to make the attorney of one of the parties his clerk, to take a deposition,
unless with the express consent of the other party, or in the presence of his attorney,
and acquiesced in by him. The part of a deposition which is in the handwriting
of the agent, or attorney of the party, cannot be read; although an agent of the
other party was present, and cross-examined the witness, after having objected to
his competency, on the ground of interest. The cross-examination, in the hand-
writing of the justice, is not exceptional, and may be read.1® If a deposition be
drawn by an attorney, agent, party or relation of a party, having or feeling an
. interest in the cause in which it is to be read, it is good ground for rejecting it.”
It is a fatal objection to a deposition that it was not orally delivered before the
examiner, in a regular course of judicial examination, and reduced to writing by
him or some proper person with his authority.® A deposition drawn up privately
by one of the counsel in the cause, from the mouth of the witness, and afterward
sworn to before a justice, under a rule to take depositions, is not admissible in evi-
dence ; a deposition, taken before a justice under a rule, ought to be reduced to
writing, from the mouth of the witnesses in the presence of the justice.”
Testimony taken under a commission in another state cannot be read in evidence,
if the attorney of one party was present when it was taken, though he took no part
in the examination, and was not employed to attend. The practice is to disallow
depositions taken by a commissioner, when the party procuring it was present with
the commissioner at the time of taking it. The party, his solicitor or agent, pro-
cures the attendance of the witnesses before the commissioner, but must withdraw
while it is being taken.”
When a deposition is taken before a justice on interrogatories, it is the duty of
the justice to put the interrogatories severally to the witness and obtain distinct
1 2 Binn. 72. 11 35 Penn. St. 111.
253. & R. 70. 12] Dall. 275.
38 W. 406. 18 3 Binn. 133.
4 2 Penn. St. 20. 144128. &R.410. See 94 Penn. St. 64.
588. &R.41. 15 Penn. St. 65. 1612~P. & W. 454.
64W.& S. 113. 16 2 Ibid. 200.
74 W. 0. 0. 186. 17 3 Ibid. 41.
8 6 W. 266. 18 8 W. 406.
9 20 Penn. St. 130. See 8 W.N. C. 37. 9125S. & R. 405.
0 32 Ibid. 514. And see 3 Binn. 539. 20 6 Penn. St. 450.
A426 EVIDENCE.
answers to each! Interrogatories which are directed to be put to the witnesses on
behalf of one party, need not be put to the witnesses of the other.’ It is not
necessary that the interrogatories should be incorporated into the body of the
depositivn ; it is sufficient that they have been severally answered.® .
In case of difference of opinion in taking down the words of the witness, the
justice should decide.*
It is not necessary that depositions taken under a commission should be sub-
scribed by the witness.2 There need not be a certificate by the justice at the
conclusion of each deposition taken by him; the general caption and certificate
are sufficient.®
Regularly the return to a commission should be addressed to the prothonotary;
but where the deposition, though received by the plaintiff, was submitted to
and first examined by the defendant’s attorney, and was afterwards filed, the
irregularity in the return was held not to be a sufficient reason for excluding it."
VII. Hanpwrirtina.
The best evidence to prove the handwriting of a person, is that of a witness who
actually saw him write it. Such direct evidence cannot, however, always be
procured ; and in general, to prove the handwriting of a person, any witness may
be called, who has, by sufficient means, acquired such a knowledge of the general
character of the handwriting of the party as will enable him to swear to his belief
that the handwriting in question is the handwriting of that person.®
The best evidence of the execution of an instrument is the testimony of the sub-
scribing witness: the next best is, proof of the handwriting of the witness, and this
will be admitted, when the witness is dead, or out of the jurisdiction of the court#*
If the subscribing witness to a bond be out of the jurisdiction of the court, and,
upvn diligent search, no person can be found within its jurisdiction, who can prove
his handwriting, evidence of the handwriting of the obligor is admissible.’
The handwriting of a party to a receipt may be proved by a witness who has
never seen him write, but who, in the course of dealing with him, has received his
notes, which he has paid; if the witness swears affirmatively, from his knowledge
derived from these facts, that he believes the signature produced to be the proper
handwriting of the party."
A notary-pubtie, who has seen much of the party’s acknowledged writing, though
he had never seen him write, was held competent to prove his signature as an attest-
ing witness to a will? Handwriting may be proved by one who has become familiar
with it, in a Jang correspondence with the writer, although he may never have seen
him write.
A witness vhose only knowledge of the handwriting of a party is derived from
having seen such party write his signature once, may be admitted to testify his
belief of the handwriting of such person, when it comes in question; but the rule
cannot be extended beyond this.* A witness who has never seen a party write, and
who has had no correspondence with him, and no knowledge of his handwriting,
except that which he derived from letters written to others, which purported to
have been written by the party, is not qualified to testify as to the handwriting
of such party.
Comparison of hands is not evidence per se ;'* except in the case of public officers,
who have been so long dead, that better proof could not be expected.!" It is evidence,
however, in civil cases, where it goes in corroboration of other evidence strongly
tending to support the fact in dispute."® After evidence has been given in support
of a writing, it may be compared with another, concerning which there is no doubt.!*
148. & R. 298. 1 19 Johns. 134.
2 1 Binn. 436. 12. 2N. & McC. 400.
3 22 Penn. St. 353. 133 P. & W. 437. 25 Penn. St. 133.
#128. & R. 410. 14 26 Ponn. St. 388.
5 1 [bid. 291, 1 W.0. 0. 144, 1 28 Ibid. 318.
6 15 Penn. St. 51. 16 1 Pears. 467.
1 22 Ibid. 353. 7148. & R. 372. 3 Phila. 55.
8 13 Penn. St. 641. 1 Greenl. Evid. 3 577. %10S.&R.110. 1P.& W. 161. 3 W. 321.
9 3 Binn, 192. 28. & R. 80. 19 6 Whart. 231. 43 Penn. St.9. 2 Gr. 306.
10 3 Binn. 192.
EVIDENCE. 427
The jury may compare an alleged forged paper with other admitted genuine signa-
tures, which have been given in evidence ;! but witnesses cannot be allowed to do
so. An expert may testify as to his opinion, whether the body and signature of
an instrument was written by the same person ;° or as to whether a signature is
genuine or simulated ;* but he cannot be permitted to give his opinion as to the
handwriting of a party where his only knowledge on the subject is acquired from
seeing the party write, during the trial, at the request of counsel.’ A comparison
of handwriting can only be made by the jury: it is not allowed as independent
proof ;® experts are not competent to make the comparison, and give their opinion
to the jury.’ To authorize the admission of a writing offered as a test or standard,
nothing short of proof by a person who saw the party write the paper, or an
admission by the party of its genuineness, or evidence of equal authority, is
sufficient.
VIII. Hearsay.
The few instances in which hearsay evidence can be admitted, are such as are in
their very nature incapable of positive and direct proof. Of this kind are all those
which can only depend on reputation. The excluding of hearsay evidence in ques-
tions of pedigree, would prevent all testimony whatever. There is no other way
of knowing the evidence of deceased persons, but by the relation of others, of what
they have been heard to say. In these cases, therefore, the law departs from its
general rule, and receives evidence of the declarations of deceased persons, who
from their situation were likely to know the facts.®
To prove pedigree, evidence may be given of hearsay, a great length of time before
any dispute had arisen. And hearsay evidence has been admitted to provea
party’s ancestors to have beeu Indians." Pedigree includes not only descent and
relationship, but also the facts of birth, marriage and death; which may be
established by general report in the family, proved by a surviving member.”
The recitals in an ancient deed are evidence to prove pedigree.
The declarations of a former owner, in relation to the boundary of the land of
which he was in possession, are competent evidence; but they are not evidence
of his right to hold by a different line from that by which he was then holding.
The declarations of a deceased person touching the locality of a boundary between
adjoining owners, have been admitted in evidence, where the survey was made by
the person making the declarations, or where they were made by an adjoining
owner, who pointed out the line at the time. But the declarations of a deceased
person who did not make the original survey, nor subsequently examine it, or run
the lines upon the ground, and who was not an adjoining owner, and did not point
out the lines at the time, are not admissible. The admission of such declarations
is not to be extended beyond the cases already adjudicated.”
A vendor’s declarations, after he has parted with the title, are not evidence to
impeach the title of his vendee.6 The declarations of a person not in possession
of the land, nor the owner of it at the time the declarations are made, cannot be
received to impeach a title derived from such person; especially, if not made in the
Cn of the party against whom they are offered, nor communicated to him after-
wards!"
The declaration of a party made to a third person after he has remitted money,
of the kind and amount sent, is inadmissible as part of the transaction.* Where a
son receives money from his father to enable him to embark in business, and gives
his note for the amount, at the time, the transaction cannot be changed from a loan
1 14 Phila. 11. 111 W. C. C, 123.
215 Ibid. 233, 12°77 Penn. St. 507. And seel Ibid. 381. 25
3 90 Penn. St. 89. Pitts. L. J. 158.
4 15 Phila. 233. 13 1 Dall. 64. 1Y. 500. 56 Penn. St. 132. 64
5 90 Penn. St. 89. And see 96 Ibid. 489. Ibid. 376.
© 57 Ibid. 438. 82 Ibid. 211. 3 Brewst. 176. 14 32 Penn. St. 302. 45 Ibid. 495.
713 W. N.C. 79. % 27 Ibid. 333.
8 6 Whart. 284. 7 Penn. St. 428. 43 Ibid. 9. 16 33 Ibid. 411.
: Feeko Evid. 11, 1 Whart. Evid. 3 201. 17 28 Ibid. 492.
Dall. 14, 1 Wall. Jr. C. C. app’x 3. 18 Thid. 501.
428 EVIDENCE.
to a gift or advancement by the loose declarations of the father, that he gave the
money to his son. ;
A witness called to state what was sworn at a former trial by another witness,
since dead, may testify to the substance, and need not state the exact words of the
witness.? The same rule applies when the witness is out of the state.’ The notes
of counsel showing what a deceased witness testified on a former trial between the
same parties, touching the same subject-matter, are evidence, when proved to be
correct in substance ; although the counsel does not recollect the testimony inde-
pendently of his notes, and does not recollect the cross-examination.*
LX. WITNESSES.
The attendance of a witness in civil cases is compelled by means of a subpena,
which is a judicial writ, commanding the witness to appear at the trial to testify for
the plaintiff or defendant, under pain of forfeiting [one hundred dollars] in case
of disobedience. If a witness wilfully neglect to attend upon the subpena, he is
guilty of a contempt of court, for which he is liable to an attachment. He is also
liable to damages at common law, in an action on the case by the party injured.
There is no privilege from the service of a subpena.®
Where an instrument is in the hands of a third person, the production is com-
pelled by means of a writ of subpana duces tecum. By this writ the witness is
compellable, it seems, to produce all documents in his possession, unless he have a
lawtul or reasonable excuse to the contrary—of the validity of the excuse the
court [or justice], and not the witness, is to judge’? Buta subpcena with a duces
tecum cannot issue to a public officer to bring original papers into court, when certi-
fied copies would be evidence.®
General Rules. By the principles of the common law, every person not in-
terested and not of infamous character, may be a competent witness.® Every
witness is presumed to be competent, until the contrary is shown,” and this is
especially so, since the passage of the act of 1849."
Persons excluded by reason of infamy, are such as have been convicted of treason,
felony, or the crimen falsi.’ A conviction of the offence of conspiracy to cheat and
defraud creditors does not disqualify ;* nor of receiving goods knowing the same to
have been stolen ;* nor of embezzlement as a public officer ; nor of an assault and
battery with intent to kill. A pardon restores the competency of the party as a
witness.” And the revised penal code provides that where any person shall be
convicted of any felony, not punishable with death, and shall endure the punish-
ment to which such offender shall be adjudged for the same, the punishment so
endured shall have the like effects and consequences as a pardon by the governor,
as to the felony or misdemeanor whereof such person was so convicted; with a
proviso that it shall not extend to the case of a party convicted of wilful and cor-
rupt perjury.” A conviction of highway robbery,’ in the quarter sessions, will not
render the defendant incompetent as a witness; the court being without jurisdic-
tion, the conviction is coram non judice.”
Insane persons, idiots, and lunatics, during their lunacy, are incompetent wit-
nesses; but lunatics, in their lucid intervals, when they have recovered their
understandings, are competent.” A lunatic, under confinement in a lunatic asylum,
is admissible as a witness, if the judge consider him competent in point of under-
standing, and to be aware of the nature and sanction of an oath? It is no objec-
1 29 Penn, St.. 125. 18 33 Penn. St. 463.
7108.4 R.14. 14 3 Clark 290.
3 4 Ibid. 419. And see 96 Penn. St. 48, 15 67 Penn. St. 386. 72 Ala. 142.
4 27 Penn. St. 30. 47 Ibid. 300. 163 W.C. C. 99. See act 16 April 1849, dis-
517. & H. Pr. 2 645. 1 Whart. Evid. 3377. qualifying persons convicted uf arson, &¢.
6 4 Dall. 341. Nothing but extreme poverty, Pamph. 665.
or utter inability to attend, will excuse disobedi- 17 2 Whart. 453. 1 G@r.329, 2 Or. C.C. 528
ence to a subpoena. 15 Wend. 602. 41 Ala. 405. And see 51 Penn. St. 332. 2
1 4 Dall. 86-7. Wheeler’s Cr. Cas. 451. 33 N. H. 388.
81 Y. 403. 18 Act 31 March 1860 3 181. Purd. 563.
9 2 Binn. 165. 19 85 Penn. St. 139.
10 59 Penn. St. 281. 1 Phila.179. 2Ibid. 114. 2 1 Whart. Evid. 2 402. 25 Gratt. 865.
70 Penn. St. 183. 15 Cox C.C.254. 10 Allen 63. 107 U.S. 521.
131 Whart. Evid. 2397. 3 W. & 8. 342,
EVIDENCE. 429
tion to the competency or credibility of a witness, that he is subject to fits of
derangement, if sane when examined.? .
A person laboring under a temporary privation of understanding from intoxication
is regarded as a voluntary madman, whom the court will not permit to testify ; but
there are various degrees of intoxication, all of which do not disqualify a man to
remember and relate the truth; it belongs to the judge [or justice] to determine
whether the situation of the witness is such, as to require that he should be excluded
from giving testimony.’ But to exclude a witness, it is not enough that he has been
found an habitual drunkard, under the statute.’ The use of opium cannot be intro-
duced to impair credit, unless it be shown that the witness was under the influence
of opium, when examined, or when the litigated event occurred.‘
Witnesses must be persons possessed of reason and understanding, and acquainted
with the nature and obligation of an oath; therefore, children of a very early age
cannot be witnesses.6 But a child may be examined, though ignorant of the,
nature of an oath, if there be a belief in a state of rewards and punishments, and a
conviction that punishment will follow falsehood. Wherever there is intelligence
enough to observe and narrate, then a child, a due sense of the obligation of an
oath being shown, can be admitted to testify." The question is entirely one of
intelligence, which, whenever a doubt arises, the court will determine to its own
satisfaction, by examining the infant as to his knowledge of the nature of an oath,
and the religious and secular penalties of perjury.* Deaf and dumb persons are
competent, if of sufficient understanding?
Athiests and such infidels as profess no religion that can bind their consciences
to speak the truth, are excluded from being witnesses.19 Persons who do not believe
in the existence of a God, or of a future state of existence, are not competent wit-
nesses." To render a witness competent, he must believe in a God who will reward
and punish according to our deserts ; whether the punishment will be temporary or
eternal, inflicted in this world or that to come, is immaterial on the question of
competency.” A disbelief in a future state goes only to the credibility of the wit-
ness.* Nor is it cause of exclusion, that the witness does not believe in the inspired
character of the Bible; in such case, the judge or justice must judge whether the
credibility of the witness be affected by his belief in the extent of the penalty to be
incurred by false swearing, and his disbelief in the Christian religion.!® Where a
witness is objected to, on the ground of disbelief in a God, and a future state of
rewards and punishments, he is not to be examined on oath respecting his religious
sentiments, but will be permitted to explain them.’® Jt would be an absurdity to
swear a person, in order to determine whether he can be sworn.” The presumption,
however, is in favor of a competent religious faith ; the want of it must be clearly
established by the party objecting to the competency of the witness. But if the
want of such religious belief be avowed by the witness in open court, or if all
the testimony, in one unbroken chain, show it, the witness must be rejected. If,
however, there be a conflict of testimony on the point, it must be referred to
the jury, as a question of credibility. It is the present belief of the witness that
determines his competency; proof of a prior want of belief only goes to his credi-
Sility.»
Except upon a preliminary hearing before a magistrate for the purpose of deter-
mining whether a person charged with a criminal offence triable in the court of oyer
and terminer ought to be committed for trial, and except also upon a hearing under
habeas corpus for the purpose of determining whether bail ought to be taken upon a
1 7 Wheat. 453, 9 8 Conn. 93. 17. & H. Pr. 3 643. 1 Stark.
22 Penn. St. 89. And see 16 Johns. 143, 6 Evid. 92 n.
Tred. 96. 10 Bull. N. P. 292. 2 Brewst. 378.
8 15S. & R. 235. Onewho does not believe in 1! 5 Mason 16. 4 Or. C. C. 446. 7 Haz. Pa.
a personal God, nor in God asan entity, is incom- Reg. 112. 18 Johns. 98. 17 Wend. 460.
petent; something more is required torender a 32 3 McLean 174, 1 Haz. U.S. Reg. 87, 2 W.
witness competent, than a belief in a supreme & S. 262.
power, simply as a power or principle. 40 Leg. 18 2 W. & 8.262. 26 Penn. St. 274. 2 Cow. 431,
Int. 5 4 3 McLean 174.
426 Ga, 528. 15 26 Penn. St. 274,
5 10 Johns. 362. 16 5 Or. C. C. 38.
6 | Browat. 352. 2 Ibid. 404. 17 1 Whart. Evid. 3 396.
71 Whart. Evid. 3 398. 18 2 Brewst. 378.
§ Ibid. 2 399. 1 5 Or. C. C. 38,
430 EVIDENCE.
commitment for murder in the first degree, or for the purpose of determining in any
case how much bail ought to be required, or for the purpose of determining in any
case whether a person committed for trial ought to be further held, and except also
upon hearings before a grand jury ; in none of which cases shall evidence for the de-
fendant be heard; and except also as provided in section two of this act, all persons
shall be fully competent witnesses in any criminal proceeding before any tribunal.
In such criminal proceeding,
(a.) A person who has been convicted in a court of this commonwealth of perjury,
which term is hereby declared to include subornation of perjury, shall not be a com-
petent witness for any purpose, although his sentence may have been fully complied
with, unless the proceedings be one to punish or prevent injury or violence attempted,
done or threatened to his person or property, in which cases he shall be competent to
testify.
(b.) Nor shall husband and wife be competent or permitted to testify against each
other, or in support of a criminal charge of adultery alleged to have been committed
by or with the other, except that, in proceedings for desertion and maintenance and
in any criminal proceeding against either for bodily injury or violence attempted, done
or threatened upon the other, each shall be a competent witness against the other,
and except also that each shall be competent merely to prove the fact of marriage in
support of a criminal charge of adultery alleged to have been committed by or with
the other.
(c.) Nor shall either husband or wife be competent or permitted to testify to confi-
dential communication made by one to the other, unless this privilege be waived upon
the trial.
(d.) Nor shall counsel be competent or permitted to testify to confidential commu-
nications made to him by his client, or the client be compelled to disclose the same,
unless in either case this privilege be waived upon the trial by the client.’
Whenever any person has been examined as a witness, either for the commonwealth
or for the defence, in any criminal proceeding conducted in or before a court of record,
and the defendant has been present and has had an opportunity to examine or cross-
examine, if such witness afterwards die, or be out of the jurisdiction so that he cannot
be effectively served with a subpoena, or if he cannot be found, or if he become incom-
petent to testify for any legally sufficient reason properly proven, notes of his exami-
nation shall be competent evidence upon a subsequent trial of the same criminal
issue ; but, for the purpose of contradicting a witness, the testimony given by him in
another or in a former proceeding may be orally proved.®
In any civil proceeding before any tribunal of this commonwealth, or conducted by
virtue of its order or direction, no liability merely for costs nor the right to compensa-
tion possessed by an executor, administrator or other trustee, nor an interest merely
in the question on trial, nor any other interest, or policy of law, except as is provided
in section five of this act, shall make any person incompetent as a witness.‘
Tn such civil proceeding,
(a.) A person who has been convicted in a court of this commonwealth of perjury,
which term is hereby declared to include subornation of perjury, shall not be a com-
petent witness for any purpose, although his sentence may have been fully complied
with, unless the judgment of conviction be judicially set aside or reversed, or unless
the proceeding be one to redress or prevent injury or violence attempted, done or
threatened to his person or property, in which cases he shall be permitted to testify.
(6.) Nor shall either husband or wife be competent or permitted to testify to confi-
ae ee made by one to the other, unless this privilege be waived upon
the trial.
(c.) Nor shall husband and wife be competent or permitted to testify against each
other, except in those proceedings for divorce in which personal service of the sub-
pena or of a rule to take depositions has been made upon the opposite party, or in
which the opposite party appears and defends, in which case either may testify fully
against the other, and except also that in any proceedings for divorce either party
may be called merely to prove the fact of marriage.
‘ (d.) Nor shall counsel be competent or permitted to testify to confidential commu-
1 Act 23 May 188721. Purd. 846, 8 Ibid. 2 3.
2 Ibid. 2 2. 4 Act 23 May 1887 34. Purd. 817.
EVIDENCE, 431
nications made to him by his client, or the client be compelled to disclose the same,
unless in either case this privilege be waived upon the trial by the client.
(e.) Nor where any party to a thing or contract in action is dead, or has been ad-
judged a lunatic and his right thereto or therein has passed, either by his own act or
by the act of the law, to a party on the record, who represents his interest in the sub-
ject in controversy, shall any surviving or remaining party to such thing or contract,
or any other person whose interest shall be adverse to the said right of such deceased
or lunatic party, be a competent witness to any matter occurring before the death of
said party or the adjudication of his lunacy, unless the proceeding is by or against the
surviving or remaining partners, joint promisors or joint promisees, of such deceased
or lunatic party, and the matter occurred between such surviving or remaining part-
ners, joint promisors or joint promisees and the other party on the record, or between
such surviving or remaining partners, promisors or promisees and the person having’
an interest adverse to them, in which case any person may testify to such matters ; or,
unless the action be ejectment against several defendants, and one or more of said
defendants disclaims of record any title to the premises in controversy at the time the
suit was brought, and also pays into court the costs accrued at the time of his dis-
claimer, or gives security therefor as the court in its discretion may direct, in which
case such disclaiming defendant shall be a fully competent witness ; or, unless the issue
or inquiry be devisavit vel non, or be any other issue or inquiry respecting the property
of a deceased owner, and the controversy be between parties respectively claiming
such property by devolution on the death of such owner, in which case all persons
shall be fully competent witnesses.
(f.) But no person who is not competent under clauses (a.) (.) (c.) and (d.) of this
section, shall become competent by the general language of the clause (e.).1
Any person who is incompetent under clause (e.) of section five, by reason of in-
terest, may nevertheless be called to testify against his interest, and, in that event, he
shall become a fully competent witness for either party ; and such person shall also be-
come fully competent for either party, by a release or extinguishment, in good faith, of -
his interest, upon which good faith the trial judge shall decide as a preliminary question.”
In any civil proceeding, whether or not it be brought or defended by a person
representing the interests of a deceased or lunatic assignor of anything or contract in
action, a party to the record or a person for whose immediate benefit such proceeding
is prosecuted or defended, or any other person whose interest is adverse to the party
calling him as a witness, may be compelled by the adverse party to testify as if under
cross-examination, subject to the rules of evidence applicable to witnesses under cross-
examination, and the adverse party calling such witnesses shall not be concluded by
his testimony ; but such person so cross-examined shall become thereby a fully compe-
tent witness for the other party as to all relevant matters, whether or not these
matters were touched upon in his cross-examination ; and also, where one of several
plaintiffs or defendants, or the person for whose immediate benefit such proceeding is
prosecuted or defended, or such other person having an adverse interest, is cross-ex-
amined under this section, his co-plaintiffs or co-defendants shall thereby become fully
competent witnesses on their own behalf as to all relevant matters, whether or not
these matters were touched upon in such cross-examination.*
In any civil proceeding, the testimony of any competent witness may be taken by
commission or deposition, in accordance with the laws of this commonwealth and the
rules of the proper court.*
Whenever any person has been examined as a witness in any civil proceeding
before any tribunal of this commonwealth, or conducted by virtue of its order or
direction, if such witness afterwards die, or be out of the jurisdiction, so that he
cannot be effectively served with a subpoena, or if he cannot be found, or if he become
incompetent to testify for any legally sufficient reason, and if the party against whom
notes of the testimony of such witnesses are offered had actual or constructive notice
of the examination and an opportunity to be present and examine or cross-examine,
properly proven notes of the examination of such witness shall be competent evidence
in any civil issue which may exist at the time of his examination, or which may be
afterwards formed between the same parties and involving the same subject-matter as
that upon which such witness was so examined ; but for the purpose of contradicting
1 Act 23 May 1887 35. Purd. 817. * Thid. 2 7.
ITbid. 36. Purd. 818. 4 Thid. ¢ 8.
432 EVIDENCE.
a witness, the testimony given by him in another, a former proceeding, may be
orally proved. :
Except defendants actually upon trial in a criminal court, any competent witness
may be compelled to testify in any proceeding, civil or criminal ; but he may not be
compelled to answer any question which, in the opinion of the trial judge, would tend
to criminate him ; nor may the neglect or refusal of any defendant, actually upon trial
in a criminal court, to offer himself as a witness, be treated as creating any presump-
tion against him, or be adversely referred to by court or counsel during the trial.’
Hereafter in any civil proceeding before any tribunal of this commonwealth, or con-
ducted by virtue of its order or direction, although a party to the thing or contract in
action may be dead or may have been adjudged a lunatic, and his right thereto or
therein may have passed, either by his own act or by the act of the law, to a party
on a record who presents his interest in the subject in controversy, nevertheless any
surviving or remaining party to such thing or contract or any other person whose in-
terest is adverse to the said right of such deceased or lunatic party, shall be a compe-
tent witness to any relevant matter, although it may have occurred before the death
of said party or the adjudication of his lunacy, if and only if such relevant matter oc-
curred between himself and another person who may be living at the time of the trial
and may be competent to testify, and who does so testify upon the trial, against such
surviving or remaining party or against the person whose interest may be thus ad-
verse, or if such relevant matter occurred in the presence or hearing of such other
living or competent person.*
The testimony now made competent by the foregoing section may also be taken by
commission or deposition, in accordance with the laws of this commonwealth and the
rules of the proper court, and, in that event, the deposition thus taken, shall be com-
petent evidence at the trial or hearing, although the person with whom or in whose
presence or hearing such relevant matter occurred, may die or become incompetent
after the taking of such deposition.‘
No person shall hereafter be incompetent to give evidence in any suit or action in
which any school district, or any officer thereof is a party, for or on account of said
person being an inhabitant of the district, or by reason of his being liable to the pay-
ment of any tax in which said school district may be interested.®
An attorney is a competent witness for his client, though the amount of his fee de-
pend on his success in the cause ;® and he is competent, although he has opened his
client’s case and cross-examined winesses.”
Attorneys to whom facts are related professionally during a cause or in contempla-
tion of it, are neither obliged nor permitted to disclose the facts so divulged, during
the pendency of that cause, or at any future time; and if a foreigner, in communi-
cating with his attorney, have recourse to an interpreter, he is equally bound to
secrecy. But where the attorney himself is, as it were, a party to the original trans-
action, as if he attest the execution of a fraudulent deed, or was employed as an
agent, and did not gain his knowledge merely by the relation of the client, the rule
does not apply. The privilege does not extend to a student in the attorney’s office.”
In a criminal prosecution, an attorney cannot be compelled to produced a document,
placed in his hands, professionally, by his client. !
A conveyancer is not entitled to the privilege of counsel as to confidential communi-
cations; he is bound to testify." An attorney even is competent to testify as to the
instructions given him in reference to the drawing of a deed.!”? So, a confidential
agent or factor is not privileged from testifying.” and a notary-public may be compelled
to testify against the truth of his certificate of protest.
The court will not compel a witness, on cross-examination, to disclose a trade secret ;
but, it seems, that in such case, his direct examinations may be stricken out.
No person shall be deemed and adjudged an incompetent witness on the trial of any
indictment, for or by reason of such person being entitled, in the event of the convic-
1 Aot 23 May 1887 29. Purd. 818. 847. R. 481, 754. And see 3 Y. 4, 12 Penn.
2 Thid. 2 10. St. 304. 3 Clark 199.
8 Act 11 June 1891. Purd. 819. 9 Pet. OC. C. 356.
4 Ibid. 2 2. 1011 W. N.C. 34.
5 Act 8 May 1854, Purd. 817, 1 5 Clark 149.
61 Dall. 241. 18.&R.32. 17 Ibid. 312, 8 128 Luz. L. Reg. 129. See 5 Cr. 0. C. 546.
Penn. St. 520. 12 Ibid. 235. 131 Dall. 439, 2 W.C. C. 388.
172 Penn. St. 228. 1 Cush. 519. 41298. & R, 284,
11 W. N.C. 191.
EVIDENCE. 433
tion of the defendant, to a restitution of his property feloniously taken, or the value
thereof; or, if fraudulently obtained, to a pecuniary remuneration or compensation
therefor ; or for or by reason of such witness being liable and subject to the payment of
the costs of prosecution.!
Upon the trial of any indictment for making or passing, and uttering any false,
forged or counterfeit coin, or bank-note, the court may receive in evidence, to establish
either the genuineness or falsity of such coin or note, the oaths of affirmations of wit-
nesses, who may, by experience and habit, have become expert in judging of the
genuineness or otherwise, of such coin or paper, and such testimony may be submitted
to the jury, without first requiring proof of the handwriting or the other tests of
genuineness, as the case may be, which have been heretofore required by law; and in
prosecutions for either of the offences mentioned or described in the 164th, 165th,
166th and 167th sections of the “ Act to consolidate, revise and amend the penal laws
of this commonwealth,’’ the courts shall not require the commonwealth to produce
the charter of either of said banks, but the jury may find that fact upon other evi-
dence, under the discretion of the court.?
In all cases of arrest, upon warrant, of any person charged with any crime of a
grade of which the court of quarter sessions has jurisdiction, the defendant, upon the
preliminary hearing before the magistrate, may subpcena and produce and examine
witnesses in his or her behalf.
No witness in any case who enters his or her recognizance, in such sum as the
magistrate may demand, to appear and testify in such prosecutions as require his
testimony, shall be committed to prison by the judge, alderman or magistrate before
whom any criminal charge may be preferred: Provided, however, That in all cases
triable in the oyer and terminer, where a positive oath is made, reduced to writing
and signed by the deponent, setting forth sufficient reasons or facts to induce the firm
belief on the part of the judge, magistrate or alderman, that any witness will abscond,
elope or refuse to appear upon the trial, that then and in such case the judge, magis-
trate or alderman may exact bail of said witness to testify.*
Execution, its Serbice and Meturn,
1. Form of an execution for debt. VI. Judicial decisions relating to executions.
II. Of the general authority of an execution. VII. Articles exempt from levy on an execu-
III. Of the service of the execution—constable’s tion.
return, and justice’s docket-entries. VIII. .Form of an execution, and constable’s re-
IV. Legal requirements in an execution. turn against a corporation.
V. Of the right to enter bail, after an execu- IX. Form of an execution, &c., in trespass.
tion shall have issued.
I. ForM oF AN EXECUTION FOR DEBT.
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ss.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
To the constable of the Second Ward, or to the next constable of the said city, most con-
venient to the defendant, greeting:
Wuersas, [A. B.], on the [first] day of [May], 1880, obtained judgment before the sub-
scriber, J. B., one of our magistrates in and for the said city, against [C. D.], for the sum
of [twenty-five] dollars [ten] cents, together with [one] dollar [20] cents costs, which
judgment remains unsatisfied: Therefore, we command you that you levy the said debt,
and the interest thereon, with the said costs, on the goods and chattels of the said debtor,
and indorse hereon the time you make your levy, and, hereon, or on a schedule to be hereto
annexed, a list of the same, and, within twenty days from the date hereof, expose the same
to sale, by public vendue, you having given due notice thereof, by three or more advertise-
ments, put up at the most public places in your ward, and returning theoverplus, if any, of
the said sale, to the said debtor.* And of your proceedings herein, together with this execu-
tion, make return to our said magistrate, on or before the [twenty-first] day of [May], 1880.
Witness our said magistrate, at Philadelphia, who hath hereunto subscribed his name,
and affixed his seal, the [first] day of [May], Anno Domini 1880.
J. B., Magistrate. [sEAL.]
Constable's return. Money paid into office, May 12th. J. H., Constable.”
If the judgment be for the recovery of money collected by any public officer, or
for official misconduct (the only cases arising from contract in which a justice is
1 Act 31 March 1860 3 52. Purd. 815. 3 Act 13 April 1867. Purd. 816.
4 Thid. 2 55. 28 4 Act 31 March 1860 2 56. Ibid-
434 EXECUTION.
empowered by the act of 1842, to issue an execution authorizing the arrest or
imprisonment of the person), then the following clause should be inserted after
the *—
_ And for want of sufficient distress, that you take the body of the said debtor into cus-
tody, and him convey to the debtor’s apartment, there to be kept by the sheriff or keeper
thereof, until the debt, interest and costs hereon indorsed, be fully paid.
II. The form of an execution for debt, here given, is believed to embrace all
the provisions and requirements of the acts of assembly. A careful perusal of the
process, as in most other cases, will enable the constable faithfully to discharge his
duty. See tit. Actions at Law, VI.
III. The constable is not authorized in any case, even where arrest in execution
has not been abolished by law, to take the defendant into cystody, unless there be
a “want of sufficient distress.” If the debtor shall give the constable “ goods and
chattels,” or valuables of any kind, out of which he is satisfied he can make the
debt, interest and costs, called for by his execution, then the constable has no right
“to take the body of the debtor into custody.” But if he cannot give such property
of his own, on which the constable may levy and make sale, then he is authorized
and commanded to convey him “to the debtor’s apartment.’ Having delivered
the debtor to the keeper, he will indorse the execution in this manner: “I certify
that the within-named defendant is in my custody, W. B., keeper of the debtor’s
apartment, August 10, 1870,” which execution, so indorsed, being returned to the
justice, shall be “‘ deemed sufficient,” and the constable, on the docket of the justice,
be discharged from all responsibility on the said execution. The justice should in
this, as in all other cases where the constable makes a written return, enter it on
his (the justice’s) docket, in the very words in which it is indorsed on the execution
or other process.
Every execution should, when returned by the constable, be indorsed in such a
way, that the indorsement may be a proper return to the execution, when entered
on the docket of the justice. For example, “ Money paid into office.’”’ “No goods.”
‘‘ Levied, and not sold for want of time.” “ Levied, and not sold for want of indem-
nity, the goods levied on being claimed by a third person, D. M.” ‘ Levied, sold
and money paid into office.’ ‘ Money paid to plaintiff, whose receipt is on the
back of the execution.” ‘Bonded and discharged by the prothonotary.” Every
return made by the constable should be signed with his name as constable, and
dated.
Whenever a constable pays money into office on an execution, the justice should
indorse it, ‘Paid into office.” This would prevent almost the possibility of error,
misunderstanding or mistake, in relation to the payment of money into the office.
This occasion is embraced to recommend that there shall be no accounts kept, no
lending nor borrowing between the magistrate and the constables. Whenever
either shall receive any money which should be paid over to the other, let it be
done with all possible promptitude.
IV. By the 22d section of the act 20th March 1810, it is provided, that ‘no
execution, issued by a justice, shall be set aside for informality, if it shall appear,
on the face of the same, that it is issued: 1. ‘In the name of the commonwealth
of Pennsylvania :’ 2. ‘ After the expiration of the proper period of time’ [for
which it may have been stayed by the entry of bail, plea of freehold, or any other
privilege which the defendant may have claimed and been allowed, or by agreement
of parties]: 3. ‘And for the sum for which judgment had been rendered, together
with interest thereon and costs:’ 4, ‘ And a day mentioned on which return is to
be made by the constable:’ 5. ‘And that the cause of action shall have been
cognisable before a justice of the peace.” A justice of the peace who has his
blank executions printed in a correct manner can hardly fail to fill them up so as
to meet all which the law requires.
V. If the execution shall issue before twenty days after judgment shall Lave
been rendered, still the defendant within that time has a right to enter bail for stay
EXECUTION. 435
of execution, or an appeal on payment of the “costs accrued on the execution,”
and for putting in bail. The same privilege, under the like payment of costs, may
be exercised by a freeholder, at any time before the expiration of the stay of
execution allowed by law, on the amount for which judgment had been entered
against him!
VI. When a justice has opened his judgment, on the affidavit of the defendant,
that he was absent from home when the summons was served, &., and a re-hearing
has been had, and the former judgment is confirmed, the stay of execution runs
from the day on which the dust judgment was entered? A defendant is not entitled
to stay of execution upon a judgment obtained against him as bail for stay of exe-
cution on any former judgment ;° nor in an action of debt on a judgment obtained
in another state ;* nor on any judgment for $100 dollars or less, if recovered for
wages of manual labor.®
A constable cannot presume to disobey an execution issued by a justice, on the
ground of irregularity in the proceedings, as, where the case was commenced b
attachment without a legal bond having been given; if he do so, he will be liable
to the plaintiff.*
Goods distrained, but replevied, may be taken in execution.? Stock in a bank
or other corporation, standing in the name of a defendant in an execution, is not
liable to be sold as his, under the act of 29th March 1819, if it actually be the
property of another.’ A loan of personal property, subject to be turned into a
sale, by a compliance with certain conditions, does not vest in the bailee such an
ownership as subjects the property to levy and sale upon an execution for his
debt.°
No execution issued by a justice of the peace shall be a lien on the property of
the defendant before a levy made thereon.” An actual seizure is generally neces-
sary to constitute a valid levy of goods, yet the defendant may dispense with it for
his own accommodation; and if he do so, as between him and the officer, the levy
is good." To constitute a good levy on personal property, it is not necessary that
an inventory should, in the first instance, be made of it, or that the sheriff [or
constable] should immediately remove the goods, or put a person in possession of
them. If they are within the power or control of the sheriff [or constable] when
the levy is made, it will be good, if followed up, within a reasonable time, by his
taking possession of them in such a manner as to apprise everybody of the fact
that they have been taken in execution.”
A constable having several executions against the same defendant in his hands, at
the same time, makes a levy, and indorses a schedule of the goods levied on one
of the executions ; this is a good levy on all the executions.
Where a constable levies an execution issued by a magistrate, on personal property,
and afterwards suffers it to be removed beyond his bailiwick, upon a bond given by
a third person to restore it at a given time, the lien of his execution is abandoned,
as against an intervening levy of another execution-creditor. The mere removai
of the property beyond the constable’s bailiwick, with his consent, is an abandon-
ment of the lien of his execution, as against the lien of another execution-creditor,
not a party to the transaction.’* If the constable suffer the goods to be removed,
he becomes liable for their value to the plaintiff.*
If a constable have reason to doubt about the ownership of property in the pos-
session of a defendant in an execution, he may require the plaintiff to indemnify
him ; and if he refuses to sell, not having done so, he becomes liable.’*
A constable who remains in possession of the defendant’s premises, under an
execution, more than a reasonable time, is liable to an action.”
1 Ash. 407. 10 Act 28 March 1820 34. Purd. 376. 2 Dall.
2 Com. Pleas, Phila. 1815. Ist.
3 25 April 1850, 3 28. Purd. 830, ll 6 W. 468.
42 Am. L. Reg. 446. 2 3R. 401.
5 Act 14 May 1874, Purd. 830, AndseelW. %%3P.& W. 230.
N. C. 510. 142M. 81.
8 11 Leg. Int. 126. 435 37 Penn. St. 187.
72 Dall. 31. 16 8 W. 220. -
8 6 Whart. 117. 1714M. & W. 239, 8 Exch. 237. 11 Mete. 339.
436 EXECUTION.
A sale of personal property by a constable upon an execution, gives a good title
to the purchaser, although the same property had been levied by a prior execution
in the hands of the sheriff. The controversy between the execution-creditors must
be determined by an appropriation of the proceeds of sale! A sale of personal
property by a constable on execution, made to the plaintiff in the execution, no
person but the constable being present at the sale, is illegal and invalid ; there
can be no public sale, without bidders and bystanders.? A constable cannot law-
fully purchase at his own sale, and one deputed by him to make the sale is subject
to the same disability ; but where the constable personally attends, and superintends
the sale, and employs one merely as a crier, the latter may purchase at the sale.’
An execution is not abated by the plaintiff's death, but shall be proceeded in.
The uniform practice, where a plaintiff dies after judgment, is for the executor to
have himself substituted, without a scire facias, and even without an application
to the court, and to take an execution when he is, in other respects, entitled to it.
It is irregular to issue a second execution, until the first is returned, for the court
[or the justice] ought to know what proceedings have been had on the first execu-
‘tion before they issue another.® Money collected upon an execution by a constable
cannot be recovered back again from the officer, upon the allegation of its having
been paid a second time.®
After the defendant has been in execution upon a ca. sa., and discharged by
consent of the plaintiff, the action is at an end ;’ but if a defendant be discharged
at his own request, another execution may be issued.’ If the plaintiff consent to
discharge one of several defendants taken on a joint ca. sa., he cannot afterward
retake him, nor take any of the others.®
Where a defendant, in custody on an execution, gives bond, with surety, to take
the benefit of the insolvent laws, and forfeits his bond, a second execution may be
issued against him. But if, when he is in custody under the second execution, the
plaintiff discharges him from prison, without the assent of the surety, the debt is
satisfied, and no action can be maintained against the surety upon the bond.”
When a bond is forfeited by the failure, on the part of the debtor, to file his
petition in time to be heard at the general period fixed for the term, execution
ay be issued against him, the moment it can be legally ascertained that he has not
complied with the terms of the law.
VII. ARTICLES EXEMPT FROM LEVY.
In lieu of the property now exempt by law from levy and sale on execution,
issued upon any judgment obtained upon contract, and distress for rent, property
to the value of three hundred dollars, exclusive of all wearing apparel of the defend-
ant and his family, and all bibles and school-books in use in the family (which shall
remain exempted as heretofore), and no more, owned by or in possession of any
debtor, shall be exempt from levy and sale on execution, or by distress for rent."
The sheriff, constable or other officer charged with the execution of any warrant
issued by competent authority, for the levying upon and selling the property, either
real or personal, of any debtor, shall, if requested by the debtor, summon three
disinterested and competent persons, who shall be sworn or affirmed, to appraise the
property which the said debtor may elect to retain under the provisions of this act,
for which service the said appraisers shall be entitled to receive fifty cents each, to
be charged as part of the costs of the proceedings; and property thus chosen and
appraised, to the value of $300, shall be exempt from levy and sale on the said exe-
cution or warrant, excepting warrants for the collection of taxes.”
In addition to the property exempt by law, sewing-machines, owned by seam-
stresses are exempted by the act of 1869. And this exemption is extended to
12 W. & S. 264. 105 R. 272.
215 Penn. St. 90. 111 Ash. 35,
3 20 Ibid. 342. 41 Ibid. 185. 12 Act 9 April 1849 2.1. Purd. 831.
4108S. & R, 119. 13 Tbid. 32. The constable is authorized to
52 Clark. 409. 2Am. Dig. 235. swear the appraisers, by act 8 April 1857. Purd.
685 W.&S. 459. 834, The fees are one dollar to constable and
74 Binn, 24, 82. each appraiser by act of 23 May 1893.
8 Act 16 June 1836 2 31. Purd. 831. 14 Act 17 April 1869, Purd. 834.
96T. BR. 525.
EXECUTION. 437
sewing-machines used and owned by private families, by the act of 1870.1 And by
the act of 1876, the exemption is extended to all leased pianos, melodions and
organs.
An unmarried defendant is entiled to the benefit of the act ;° but a non-resident
debtor, liable to be sued by foreign attachment is not. The defendant, however, may
claim the benefit of the act, as against: an attachment-execution ;° and in a suit com-
menced by attachment, under the act of 1869.§
The defendant in an action for a tort is not entitled to the benefit of the act;7 but
it embraces a judgment against the plaintiff for costs, in an action of tort.2 A consta-
ble against whom execution is obtained for official misconduct or negligence, is not
entitled to the exemption;® and no exemption is allowed upon a judgment for $100 or
less, obtained for wages for manual labor,’ nor on a judgment for four weeks’ board.“
Individual partners are not severally entitled, under the act of 1849, to retain out
of the partnership effects levied on, specific articles to the value of $300.2 The act
must be so construed as to admit a dealer to enjoy $300 of his capital in trade; a new
stock purchased with the proceeds of other articles retained under the exemption iaw,
is protected.¥
_ A defendant cannot claim the benefit of the exemption law out of property which
he has conveyed in fraud of his creditors; the conveyance, though void as to the
creditors, is nevertheless conclusive on the debtor for all purposes; he cannot claim
to have goods set apart to him, to which he disclaims title. If he falsely deny to
the constable his ownership of the property levied on, he forfeits his right under the
exemption law.’ The exemption may be claimed out of any bank-notes, money,
stocks, judgments, or other indebtedness to the defendant in the execution.”
The exemption of property to the amount of $300, from execution, is a privilege
which may be waived by the defendant; and when he does waive it in writing, he
cannot afterwards claim it.* When made at the time the debt is created, the waiver
is based upon the same consideration as that upon which rests the liability to pay,
and is, therefore, irrevocable. A verbal agreement to waive the exemption, made
without consideration, is not binding on the debtor.” And a prospective waiver is
inoperative, unless made in clear and unequivocal language.“ The defendant cannot
waive the exemption in favor of a junior lien-creditor, nor can he assign it to a third
person ; any such arrangement is void, and amounts, pro tanto, to an abandonment of
his claim.”
The claim for the benefit of the exemption law, must be, generally, made in the
case which is the instrument of affecting the sale.% Where several writs are in the
constable’s hands at the same time, one demand is sufficient as to all, but the rule is
different as to successive writs ; "4 he must claim the exemption against every execu-
tion creditor.”
During the temporary absence of the owner, any person left in charge of the prem-
ises, and especially a child of proper age, is authorized to claim the benefit of the
exemption law, in case of a levy under execution.” A demand by the defendant’s
wife and counsel is sufficient.2”7 But a wife must show affirmatively that she is en-
titled to claim as her husband’s agent; the mere existence of the marital relation is
not enough.”
15 34 Penn. St. 187.
16 38 Penn. St. 190. And see 6 W. N. C. 539.
17 Act 8 April 1859. Purd. 834. See 36 Penn.
1 Act 1 March 1870. Purd. 834. This does
not apply to those who keep sewing-machines
for sale or hire, Ibid.
2 Act 13 May 1876. Ibid.
33 Gr. 30.
426 Penn. St. 351.
130. 6 W.N, C. 309.
5 38 Penn. St. 190.
63 Gr. 319. ° 4 Leg. Gaz. 401.
250.
761 Penn. St. 292. 3 Luz. L. Obs. 375.
82 Gr. 424. 2 Wood. 127.
9 29 Penn. St. 176.
10 Act 4 March 1887. Purd, 834,
11 Act 4 April 1889. Purd. 834.
12 42 Penn. St. 442. 1 Phila. 352,
13 30 Penn. St. 261.
1429 Ibid. 210. 51 Ibid. 90. 3Gr.30. 5
Phila. 17, 8 Ibid. 569,
68 Ibid. 217. 2 Penny.
44 Ibid. 206. 3 Gr. 319.
40 Leg. Int.
St. 130. 75 Ibid. 417. 76 Ibid. 105.
186 W. 34, 21 Penn. St. 210. 23 Ibid. 93, 2
Pars. 279.
19 23 Penn. St. 93. 31 Ibid. 225.
And see 40 Penn. St. 324.
201 Pitts. 197.
21 56 Penn. St. 161.
22 21 Ibid. 160. 32 Ibid. 160. 36 Ibid. 373.
11 W. N.C. 511. And see 42 Penn. St. 395. 48
Ibid. 315,
23 32 Penn. St. 276. 25 Ibid. 252.
249 Gr. 197, 375.
25 38 Penn. St. 190.
26 32 Ibid. 82.
273 Gr. 319. 68 Penn. St.213. 73 Ibid. 368.
28 2 Leg. Gaz. 125.
3 Gr, 132.
438 EXECUTION.
The demand for an appraisement must be made at such a time as to cause no
delay to the plaintiff; after the property levied on has been put up for sale, and
the biddings have commenced, it is too late! It must be made before the day of
sale, and unless under special circumstances, before the advertisements are put up.*
The object of the legislature was, to prevent the sale of the property ; and every
act or omission of the debtor, which amounts to an acquiescence in, or an affirmance
of the sale, is in direct contravention of that object.®
When the apparent value of the goods levied on is less than the amount exempted
by law, it is unnecessary to make any further specification than is implied in the
demand; at least, until after the appraisement.* The court or justice, may set
aside the appraisement before the return of the writ, where it is manifestly below
the market price.® If the appraisement be not publicly conducted, it is sufficient
cause for setting it aside.®
In no case can the defendant entitle himself to any portion of the proceeds of his
personal property. The act speaks of property, not money. It requires him to
elect the goods he wishes to retain, and have them appraised; and the property
thus chosen and appraised shall be exempt from levy and sale.”
If a debtor sell the property exempt from execution, the money is liable to attach-
ment in the hands of the purchaser; and so are the damages recovered by him in
an action of’ trespass for taking it in execution, for such recovery transfers the right
‘of property, and has the effect of a sale.® But the debt itself cannot be defalked
against the plaintifi’s damages.® In case of non-compliance by the officer with the
debtor’s claim to the exemption, his only remedy is by action.’? This decision
appears to operate with great harshness against the unfortunate debtor, since the
court have decided that the damages, when recovered, are liable to be attached.
An officer refusing to allow the exemption, becomes a trespasser ab initio ;“ and
either case or trespass will lie against him.”
The following form of election and appraisement may be used :
es a Execution issued by J. R., Justice.
C 5 Debt, $50 and costs. 8S. S., Constable.
I, C. D., the defendant above named, do elect to retain the following articles of per-
sonal property, under the second section of the act of 9th April 1849, to wit:
We, the subscribers, having been summoned by S. S., constable, to appraise the pro-
perty retained by the above-named defendant, and having been respectively sworn or
affirmed, do value and appraise the same as follows, to wit:
VIII. ForM oF AN EXECUTION AGAINST A CORPORATION.
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ss.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To the Constable of the Fifth Ward, or to the next constable of the said city, most
convenient to the defendant, greeting :
Wuerzas, [A. B.], on the [first] day of [May] 1880, obtained judgment before the
subscriber, J. B., one of our magistrates in and for the said city, against !the Philadelphia
Bank], for the sum of [ninety] dollars [twenty] cents, together with [one] dollar [fifty]
cents costs, which judgment remains unsatisfied: Therefore, we command you, that you
levy the said debt, and the interest thereon, with the said costs, on the goods and chattels
of the said bank, and indorse hereon the time you make your levy, and hereon, or on a
schedule to be hereto annexed, a list of the same, and, within twenty days from the date
hereof, expose the same to sale by public vendue, you having given due notice thereof by
three or more advertisements, put up at the most public places in your ward, and returning
the. overplus, if any, of the said sale, to the said bank. And of your proceedings herein,
together with this execution, make return to our said magistrate, on or before the [twenty-
aa day of [May] 1880.
Witness our said magistrate, at Philadelphia, who hath hereunto subscribed nis name,
and affixed his seal, the [first] day of [May], Anno Domini 1880.
J. B., Magistrate. [seat]
119 Penn. St.. 255. 20 Ibid. 141. 25 Ibid. 7 19 Penn. St. 255-7.
182. 2 Pars. 279. 8 23 Ibid. 489,
4 39 Penn. St. 213. 56 Ibid. 402, 9 32 Ibid. 82.
8 21 Ibid. 247. 44 Ibid. 207. 10 19 Ibid. 255. 34 Ibid. 36. See 11 Paige 180.
4 32 Penn. St. 82. 11 28 Penn. St.238. 26 Ibid. 264. 42 Leg. Int
6 1 Phila. 348. ee —_——=
6 4 Ibid. 353. Bay es
EXECUTORS AND ADMINISTRATORS, 439 -
IX. ForM oF AN EXECUTION IN TRESPASS.
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ss.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To the Constable of the Fifth Ward, or to the next constable of the said city most
convenient to the defendant, greeting :
Waereas, (A. B.], on the [first] day of [May] 1880, obtained judgment before the sub-
scriber, J. B., one of our magistrates in and for the'said city, against [C. D.], for the sum
of [eighty-six] dollars [ten cents damages, in trespass, together with hwy dollars
twenty] cents costs, which judgment remains unsatisfied: Therefore, we command you,
that you levy the said debt, and the interest thereon, with the said costs, on the goods
and chattels of the said defendant, and indorse hereon the time you make your levy, and
hereon, or on a schedule to be hereto annexed, a list of the same, and, within twenty
days from the date hereof, expose the same to sale, by public vendue, you having given
due notice thereof by three or more advertisements, put up at the most public places
in your ward, and returning the overplus, if any, of the said sale, to the said defendant.
And for want of sufficient distress, that you take the body of the said defendant into
custody, and him convey to the debtor’s apartment, there to be kept by the sheriff or
keeper thereof, until the damages, interest and costs hereon indorsed be fully paid. And
of your proceedings herein, together with this execution, make return to our said magis-
trate, on or before the [sixteenth] day of [June] 180.
Wirness our said magistrate, at Philadelphia, who hath hereunto subscribed his name
and affixed his seal, the [twenty-sixth] day of [May], Anno Domini 1880.
J. B., Magistrate. [smaz.]
Constable's return.— No goods, and the defendant in custody.
May 20th, 1880. G. W., Constable.”
Cxecutors and Administrators.
tL. Who shall be executors and administrators, III. Forms of summons, executions for execu-
and their duties. i tors and administrators, and constable’s
II. Statutes and judicial authorities. ’ return.
I. AN executor is the person to whom another commits, by will, the execution of
his last will and testament. An administrator is he to whose care the goods of a
deceased person are committed for distribution by a public officer, called the ordi-
nary in England, and the register of wills in Pennsylvania. If the execution be
committed to a woman, she is called an executrix; if a woman take out letters of
administration, she is called an administratrix. If the deceased leave a will, but
name no executor, an administrator cum testamento annexo [with the will annexed]
is appointed. In case of the death or renunciation of a sole executor, or the death
of a sole administrator, the register appoints, in the former case, an administrator
de bonis non [of the goods not administered] cum testamento annexo ; in the latter
case, an administrator de bonis non.
In England, and in many of the United States, an executor of an executor repre-
sents the original testator; but the law is altered in Pennsylvania.’ An executor
or administrator must give notice of his appointment.? Before letters are issued, he
must file an affidavit setting forth as nearly as can be ascertained, the day and hour
of the death of the decedent ;? he must file also an inventory and appraisement
within thirty days after his appointment.‘ He must take the following oath, “ You
do swear [or solemnly, sincerely and truly declare and affirm], that as executor of
the last will and testament of A. B. [or as administrator of the estate of A. B.],
deceased, you will well and truly administer the goods and chattels, rights and
credits of said deceased, according to law; and also well and truly comply with the
provisions of the law relating to collateral inheritances.’ Non-resident executors
and administrators must likewise give bond, with two sufficient sureties, for the
faithful performance of the duties of their office.
1 Act 15 March 1832. Purd. 575. 4 Act 15 March 1832. Purd. 583.
2 Act 24 February 1834. Ibid. 587. 5Tbid. Purd. 576,
=e Act 15 May 1874. Ibid. 575.
440 EXECUTORS AND ADMINISTRATORS.
II. Acr 24 Fepruary 1834. Purd. 594.
Sror. 26. The executors or administrators of any person who at the time of his
decease was a party, plaintiff, petitioner or defendant in any action or legal proceed-
ing depending in any court of this commonwealth, shall have full power, if the
cause of action doth by law survive to them, to become party thereto, and prosecute
or defend such suit or proceeding to final judgment or decree, as fully as such dece-
dent might have done if he had lived; and if such plaintiff or petitioner die after
judgment or decree in his favor, his executors or administrators may proceed to
execution thereupon, as such plaintiff or petitioner might have done if he had
lived.
Sor 27. The court in which any action or legal proceeding may be depending
as aforesaid, shall have power to require, by a writ of scire facias, such executors
or administrators, within twenty days after the service thereof, to become party to
such action or proceeding, or to show cause, at the next succeeding term, why they
should not be made party thereto, by judgment of the court, and further proceed-
ings be had in such action or proceeding; but in every such case, the executors or
administrators, who shall become party as aforesaid, shall be entitled to the continu-
ance of such action or proceeding during one term.
Sxor. 28. Executors or administrators shall have power to commence and prose-
cute all personal actions which the decedent whom they represent might have com-
menced and prosecuted, except actions for slander, for libels and for wrongs done to
the person ; and they shall be liable to be sued in any action, except as aforesaid,
which might have been maintained against such decedent if he had lived.
Sxor. 29. The executors or administrators of every person who was the proprietor
of any rent-charge, or other rent or reservation in nature of a rent, in fee or other-
wise, as mentioned in the 8th section of this act, shall and may have an action of
debt for the arrearages of such rent due to the decedent, at the time of his decease,
against the person who ought to have paid such rent, or his executors or adminis-
trators; or they may distrain therefor upon the lands or tenements which were
charged with the payment thereof, and liable to the distress of such decedent so
long as such lands or tenements remain and are in the seisin or possession of the
tenant who ought to have paid such rent, or in the possession of any other person
claiming the same, from or under the same tenant, by purchase, gift or descent, in
like manner as such decedent might have done if he had lived.
Sect. 30. The executors or administrators of any tenant for life, who shall die
before or on a day on which any rent was reserved or made payable upon any
demise or lease of any real estate, which determined on the death of such tenant
for life, may have an action on the case, to recover from the lessee or under-tenant
of such real estate, if such tenant for life die on the day on which the same was
made payable, the whole, or, if before the day, a proportion of such rent for the last
year, or quarter of a year, or other current period of payment, according to the time
elapsed at the decease of such tenant for life as aforesaid.
Sect. 31. No action or other legal proceedings, commenced by or against execu-
tors or administrators, shall be abated or otherwise defeated, by reason of the death,
dismissal, resignation or renunciation of.any one or more of them, nor by reason of
‘the annulling or revoking of the letters or powers granted to them, or any of them;
but such suit or proceeding may be prosecuted to final judgment or decree, by or
against such other person or persons as may have been joined with them in the
administration, or by or against such person or persons as may be their successors
therein, in all cases, in like manner as if no such change had occurred or act been
done; and in all cases of the vacancy of the administration as aforesaid, the succes-
sors therein shall be made party to such action or proceeding, in a manner provided
by the 26th and 27th sections of this act.
Sror. 33. No execution for the levy or sale of any real or personal estate of any
decedent, shall be issued upon any judgment obtained against him in his lifetime,
unless his personal representatives have been first warned, by a writ of scire fucias,
to show cause against the issuing thereof, notwithstanding the teste of such execu-
tion may bear date antecedently to his death. And in all cases where property, real
or personal, of a decedent is sold upon an execution, and more money raised than is
sufficient to pay off liens of record, the balance shall be paid over to the executor or
EXECUTORS AND ADMINISTRATORS. 441
administrator for distribution; but before any such payment shall be made, such
executor or administrator shall give bond, to the satisfaction of the court, conditioned
for the legal distribution of such money: Provided always, That such money shall
be distributed as the real estate of which it is the proceeds would have been.
Sect. 35. In every case of an execution against the executors or administrators
of a decedent, whether founded upon a judgment obtained against such decedent in
his lifetime, or upon a judgment obtained against them in their representative
character, if it shall be made to appear to the satisfaction of the court issuing such
execution, that there is reason to believe that the personal assets are insufficient
to pay all just demands upon the estate, such court shall thereupon stay all pro-
ceedings upon such execution, until the executors or administrators shall have made
application to the proper orphans’ court for the sale of the real estate of the dece-
dent, or for the apportionment of the assets, or both, as the case may require.
Secor. 37. The omission of an executor or administrator to plead to any action
brought against him in his representative character, that he has fully administered
the estate of the decedent or any other matter relative to the assets, shall not be
deemed an admission of assets to satisfy the demand made in such action; also the
omission of the plaintiff to reply to any such matter, when pleaded, shall not be
deemed an admission of the want of assets as aforesaid, nor shall such omission
otherwise prejudice either party. And no mispleading, or lack of pleading, by
executors or administrators, shall make them liable to pay any debt or damages
recovered against them in their representative character, beyond the amount of the
assets which in fact have come or may come into their hands.
Letters of administration, granted in a sister state, are a sufficient authority to
maintain an action, in this state, to recover assets which were never liable to admin-
istration here. But not to recover the choses in action of a non-resident decedent ;
such choses and assets being subject to our jurisdiction ;1 the law in this respect,
was intended to be altered by the act of 1832.2 But letters granted in a foreign
country, confer no power to sue in this state.
Since the act of [834, an action of trover will lie against executors, upon a con-
version by their testator, in his lifetime ;* and so will any other personal action,
except suits for slander, libel or wrong to the person.
The executor of the plaintiff may be substituted, in case of his death, after the
commencement of the action, without a scire facias, by suggesting the death upon
the record.6 An administrator de bonis non may be substituted as plaintiff, in a
jadgment obtained by the administrator whom he succeeds.’ And the substitution
may be made at any time.®
An executor is not bound to plead the statute of limitations ;? but where an
estate is insolvent, each creditor has a right to oppose the bar of the statute, to the
claim of another upon the fund. In an action at law against an administrator, to
recover a debt of the decedent, the statute of limitations is a bar, although less
than six years from the time it accrued, had elapsed at the decease of the debtor.”
And in a proceeding in the orphans’ court for distribution, the limitation runs in
favor of the estate, after the decease of the debtor, though the claim were not
then barred.”
An executor or administrator who, in good faith, prosecutes a claim of the estate,
and fails, is not personally liable to the defendant for his costs ; the judgment for
costs is against the estate only.’ Hxecutors (or administrators) who act with
ordinary diligence and attention, are not liable for a loss of the funds of the estate ,
nor are they liable for the mismanagement or insolvency of their agents, which
they could not foresee nor control. An executor who receives money of the estate,
and pays it over to a co-executor who afterwards becomes insolvent, is not charge-
1 42 Penn. St. 467. 61 Ibid. 299. 8118. & R. 381.
2 Report of the Revisers of the Civil Code. 91 Ash. 352. 1 Whart. 66. 12 Penn. St. 67.
31 Dall. 456. 10 17 Penn. St. 433.
4 4 Phila. 87. 11 31 Ibid. 455. 63 Ibid. 249. See 93 Ibid. 182.
5 24 Penn. St.122. 59 Ibid. 327. 12°17 W. N. C. 17, 33.
6108. &R.110. 4 Penn. St. 232. 18 23 Ibid. 471. 3 Clark 426.
17 Penn. St. 385. 14 6 W. 185.
A442 EXECUTORS AND ADMINISTRATORS.
able with it, in favor of legatees, although he would be in favor of creditors.’ An
administrator is chargeable with the amount of a note due to his intestate, for the
collection of which he delayed the institution of suit for several years after his
intestate’s death, when with proper diligence the debt might have been collected.?
In an action by an administrator to recover a debt due to his intestate, the
defendant will not be allowed to set off a debt due to him by the administrator, for
services rendered to him in the course of his administration of the estate.”
Executors (or administrators) will not be permitted, under any circumstances, to
make profit for themselves out of the funds of the estate in their hands,* If an
administratrix mix the funds of the estate with her own moneys, and employ both
in trade, the parties in interest may, if they prefer it, insist on having a proportion-
able share of the profits, instead of interest on the amount of trust funds so
employed.
ILI. Forms of suMMons, EXEcuTIONS, &c.
SUMMONS FOR ADMINISTRATRIX AGAINST EXECUTORS.
BEAVER COUNTY, ss.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To the Constable of the township of S—, in the county of Beaver, greeting:
We command you that you summon J. L. and E. W., executors of the last will and
testament of T. B., deceased, so that they be and appear before J. R., one of our justices
of the peace in and for the said county, on ——, the 8th of March, instant, at three o’clock
in the afternoon of that day, to answer S. C., administratrix of T. C., deceased, of a plea
of debt not exceeding three hundred dollars. Witness the said J. R., at S—— aforesaid,
the lst day of March, a. p. 1880. J. R., Justice of the Peace. [sEat.]
Constable's return.—‘‘ Served on both the defendants, personally, March 7th, 1880, ty
producing to them the original summons, and informing them of the contents thereof,
R. R., Constable."
SUMMONS FOR SURVIVING EXECUTOR AGAINST ADMINISTRATORS WITH THE WILL ANNEXED.
BEAVER COUNTY, ss.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To the Constable of L—— township, in the county of Beaver, greeting:
We command you, that you summon J. L., J. D., and R. R., administrators of C. W.,
deceased. with the will of the said C. W. annexed, so that they be and appear before J. R.,
one of our justices of the peace in and for the said county, on the seventh day of July
next, at ten of the clock in the forenoon of that day, to answer G. B., surviving executor
of the testament and last will of D. B., deceased, of a plea of debt or demand not exceeding
three hundred dollars. Witness the said J. R., as L—— township aforesaid, the thirtieth
day of June, a. v. 1880. J. R, Justice of the Peace. [szaz.]
Constable's return.— Served on R. R., by producing to him the original summons,
and informing him of the contents thereof. J. L. and J. D. not found.
“July 6th, 1880. R. R., Constable.”
EXECUTION FOR EXECUTRIX AGAINST ADMINISTRATORS.
BEAVER COUNTY, ss
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To the Constable of S—— township, in the county of Beaver, greeting:
Wuenreas, M. L., executrix of the testament and last will of M. L., deceased, on the
third day of May, obtained judgment before J. R., one of our justices of the peace in and
for the county of Dauphin, against R. R., administrator of all and singular the goods and
chattels, rights and credits, which were of W. C., deceased, for a debt of forty dollars,
together with two dollars and ten cents costs, and the said W. W.and R. R. having hitherto
neglected to comply with the said judgment; we command you that of the goods and
chattels which were of the said W. R, in the hands and possession of the said W. W. and
R. R., administrators as aforesaid, you levy the debt and costs aforesaid, if you find so
much in their hands which were of the said W. R. at the time of his death to be admin-
istered ; and if so much in their hands you find not, then the costs aforesaid cause you to
1 6 W. 250. 46 W. 250.
2 Thid. 46. 5 36 Penn. St. 174.
8 8 Ibid. 74.
EXPLOSIVES. 443
be levied of the proper goods and chattels of them the said W. W. and R. R., and indorse
hereon the time you make your levy, and hereon, or a schedule hereto annexed, a list
of the same ; and within twenty days thereafter expose the same to sale by public vendue,
having given due notice thereof by at least three advertisements put up at the most
pubis places in your township, and returning the overplus, if any, to the said W. W. and
. R.; and of your proceedings herein, together with this execution, make return to our
said justice on or before the [fourth] day of November, a. p. 1880. Witness the said
J. R., at S—— township aforesaid, the fifteenth day of October, a. p. 1880.
J. R., Justice of the Peace. [sxaL.]
EXECUTION FOR SURVIVING ADMINISTRATORS AGAINST EXECT TORS.
BEAVER COUNTY, ss.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To the Constable of S—— township, in the county of Beaver, greeting:
Waereas, H. L., surviving administrator of C. W., deceased, on the third day of May
1880, obtained judgment before J. R., one of our justices of the peace in and for the said
county, against L. K. and R. R., executors of the testament and last will of S. B., deceased,
for a demand of six dollars and fifty cents, together with one dollar and sixty-two cents
costs, and the said L. K. and R. R. having hitherto neglected to comply with the said judg-
ment ; we command you, that of the goods and chattels which were of the said S. B., in the
hands or possession of the said L. K. and R. R., executors as aforesaid, you levy the debt
and costs aforesaid, if so much in their hands you find which were of the said 8. B. at the
time of his death to be administered they have ; and if so much in their hands they have
not, then the costs aforesaid cause you to be levied of the proper goods and chattels of the
said L. K. and R. R., and indorse hereon the time you make your levy, and hereon, or on
a schedule hereto annexed, a list of the same, and within twenty days thereafter expose
the same to sale by public vendue, having given due notice thereof, by at least three
advertisements put up at the most public places in your township, and returning the
overplus, if any, to the said L. K. and R. R.; and of your proceedings herein, together
with this execution, make a return to our said justice, on or before the fourth day of
November, a. pv. 1880. Witness the said J. R., at 8 township aforesaid, the fifteenth
day of October, a. p. 1880. J. R., Justice of the Peace. [szaL.]
Constable's return.—' Money paid into office, October 25th, 1880.
G. H., Constable.”
Cxplosibes.
I. Carriage of explosives. II. Sale of explosives.
I. Aor 23 May 1878. Purd. 503.
Sror. 1. If any person shall enter into or upon any railroad train, locomotive,
tender or car thereof, or into or upon any stage-coach, or other conveyance used
for the carrying of freight or passengers, having in his custody, or about his person,
any nitro-glycerine or torpedo, (or) shall carry or cause to be carried, other than as
freight regularly shipped as such, such substance, material or device, upon such
train, locomotive, tender, car, coach or other conveyance, such person shall be deemed
guilty of a misdemeanor ; and upon conviction thereof, shall be sentenced to pay a
fine not exceeding five hundred dollars, and to undergo an imprisonment not exceed-
ing three months, or either, in the discretion of the court. oe
Sgor. 2. The conductor or persons having charge and control of any railroad train,
coach or other conveyance for the carriage of freight or passengers, shall have
power to arrest any party or parties, or person or persons, found violating the pro-
visions of the first section hereof, and to detain such party or person until reaching
some place, where such person or persons may be delivered to a constable or other
police authority, to be taken before any magistrate having jurisdiction of crim-
inal matters, there to be proceeded against by information, as in other criminal
cases ; and it shall be lawful to prosecute such offenders in any county through
which said public conveyance passes, without reference to the place where such
offenders were arrested.
444 EXTORTION.
II. Act 10 Junz 1881. Purd. 503.
Scr. 1. Any person, who shall, knowingly and wilfully, sell or cause to be sold,
to any person under sixteen years of age, any cannon, revolver, pistol or other such
deadly weapon, or who shall knowingly and wilfully sell, or cause to be sold, to any
such minor, any imitation or toy cannon, revolver or pistol so made, constructed
or arranged as to be capable of being loaded with gunpowder or other explosive
substance, cartridges, shot, slugs or balls, and being exploded, fired off and dis-
charged, and thereby become a dangerous or deadly weapon, or who shall know-
ingly and wilfully sell, or cause to be sold, to any such minor, any cartridge,
gunpowder or other dangerous and explosive substance, shall, in every such case, be
guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof, shall be sentenced to pay a
fine not exceeding three hundred dollars,
The act 11 June 1885 (Purd. 503) prohibits the manufacture and sale of toy deadly
weapons.
Extortion,
I. Remedy of party grieved for extorting ille- III. Penalty for extorting from travellers.
gal fees. IV. Authorities and decisions.
II. Provisions of the Penal Code.
I. Act 28 Marcu 1814. Purd. 879.
Szcr. 26. If any officer whatsoever shall take greater or other fees than is
hereinbefore expressed, and limited, for any service to be done by him, after the
first day of September next, in his office; or if any officer shall charge or demand,
and take any of the fees hereinbefore ascertained, where the business, for which
such fees are chargeable, shall not have been actually done and performed; or if
any officer shall charge or demand any fee for any service or services, other than
those expressly provided for by this act, such officer shall forfeit, and pay to the
party injured, fifty dollars, to be recovered as debts of the same amount are recover-:
able. And if the judges of any court within this commonwealth, shall allow any
officer, under any pretence whatsoever, any fees under the denomination of cow-
pensatory fees, for any service not specified in this act, or some other fact of
assembly, it shall be considered a misdemeanor in office.’
II. Aor 31 Marca 1860. Purd. 503.
Szor. 12. If any justice, clerk, prothonotary, sheriff, coroner, constable or other
officer of this commonwealth, shall, wilfully and fraudulently, receive or take any
reward or fee to execute and do his duty and office, but such as is or shall be
allowed by some act of assembly of this commonwealth ; or shall receive or take,
by color of his office, any fee or reward whatever, not, or more than is allowed as
aforesaid ; he shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor in office, and, on conviction,
be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars, or to undergo an
imprisonment not exceeding one year.
III. Aor 13 June 1836. Purd. 1882.
Sor. 65. If any person working upon any road or highway, or if any one in
company with such person, shall ask money or reward, or by any means whatever
shall extort, or endeavor to extort, any money, drink or other thing, of or from any
person travelling upon or near such road or highway, the person so offending shall,
for every such offence, forfeit and pay a sum not exceeding five dollars.
III. Letortion is an abuse of public justice,.and consists in any officer’s taking,
by color of his office, from any one, any money or thing of value, where none at all
is due, or not so much is due, or before'it is due.? An extortion, in a large sense, is
taken for any oppression by power or pretence of right. ‘The writers on the
common law consider extortion as more heinous than robbery itself, attended, as it
usually is, with the aggravated sin of perjury.’
1 See 1 Wood. 178. 8-1 Hawk. P. C. 418.
2 Co, Litt. 368. 6 Cow. 661. A BOS EER AON. Noss
fens.
FACTORIES, 445
The exaction of a fee by any officer, before it is due, is extortion at common law.)
By act of 22d February 1821, “it shall be lawful for the recorder of deeds and
register of wills, to receive the fees for recording the same, at the time the deed or
deeds, will or wills, are left at his office for recording, any law or usage to the con-
trary notwithstanding.”? And by act of 11th April 1850, it is provided, that
nothing in the act of 1814 shall be deemed to impose upon any sheriff, deputy-
sheriff or constable, any penalty for taking the fee for service, or copy of apy writ
of summons or other original process, at the time of receiving such process to be
served?
But the act 22d March 1869, the justices of Westmoreland county may demand
their fees and those of the constables, before issuing criminal process. And by
the act 17th April 1869, the aldermen of Allegheny county are required to collect
from the plaintiff in civil cases, before entering the action on the docket, the fees
for entering the action, and issuing and return of summons.®
The penal clauses of the act of 1814 are not repealed by the act of 1860, punish-
ing the extortion of illegal fees by indictment.§ A justice is indictable for exacting
illegal fees ;* but the indictment must aver that the illegal charge was made “ wilfully
and fraudulently ;”’* and of this the jury are the judges.® He is liable, however,
to the penalty prescribed by the act of 1814, though he supposed, at the time, that
they were legally demandable, and acted without any corrupt intent.!° Where a
justice charges illegal fees, which are indorsed on the execution, and collected hy
the constable, the former is liable for the penalty, though they were not paid over
to him." And if it appear that he charged and received a greater sum for a speci-
fied item of service than he was entitled to, it will be no defence to an action for
the penalty, that he omitted to charge as much as he was entitled for another item
of service.”
factories.
Aot 21 Aprin 1849. Purd. 864.
Scr. 2. Labor performed during a period of [ten] hours on any secular day in
all cotton, woollen, silk, paper, bagging and flax factories, shall be considered a
legal day’s labor ; and hereafter no minor shall be employed in or about any of said
’ factories until he or she shall have obtained to the age of thirteen years.
Sxct. 3. If any owner or employer of or in any of the said factories, or his, her
or their agent, shall wilfully or knowingly employ any minor below the age of
thirteen years as aforesaid, the person or persons so offending shall pay a penalty
of fifty dollars for every such offence, to be sued for and recovered by any person
suing for the same, as other debts of like amount are now by law recoverable, one-
half of the same to belong to the persons suing for the same, and the other half
to the county in which the offence was committed.
Szor. +. No minor, who has attained the age of thirteen and is under the age
of sixteen years, shall be employed in any of the factories aforesaid for a longer
period than nine calendar months in any one year, and who shall not have attended
achool for at least three consecutive months within the same year; and any
owner or employer of or in any of the factories aforesaid, offending against the
provisions of this section, shall be liable to the penalty provided in the 3d section
of this act, to be sued for, recovered and applied as therein provided.
Srot. 5. If any parent or guardian shall consent to, permit or connive at the
employment of his or her child or ward, under the age of thirteen years, in any of
the said factories; or if such parent or guardian shall consent to, permit or connive
at the employment of his or her child or ward over the age of thirteen years, and
11 Pick. 279. 79 Phila. 574.
: Purd. 880 ; Vo oe 253.
Ibid. ow. ,
‘ Pomph. 478, 10 178. & R. 75.
> Pamph. 1184. 13P.& W. 519
6 33 Pitts. L. J. 147. 28 Ibid. 211. 27 Ibid. 1 5 W. 477.
146, 11 W. N. C. 269.
446° FACTORIES. ;
under the age of sixteen years, for a longer period than [ten] hours in any secular
day, the person go offending shall forfeit and pay the sum of fifty dollars tor evevy
such offence, to be sued for and recovered as provided in the 3d section of this act,
and for the uses therein specified.
Aot 7 May 1855. Purd. 864.
Szor. 1 No male or female operative under the age of twenty-one years shall,
under any contract, be employed in cotton, woollen, silk, flax, bagging or paper
manufactories in this commonwealth, for a longer period than sixty hours in any
one week, or more than an average of ten hours a day during the same period.
Szcor. 2. If any person shall knowingly employ, or any parent or guardian con-
sent to the employment of, any male or female operative under the age of twenty-
,one years as aforesaid, contrary to the preceding section, and proof be made thereof
before any alderman or justice of the peace of the ward, borough or district whére
such offence is committed, he, she or they so employing such operatives, or con-
senting thereto as aforesaid, shall, for every such offence, forfeit and pay the penalty
of not less than ten, nor more than fifty dollars, to be recovered before any alder-
man or justice of the peace of the proper ward, borough or district, in the same
manner as the like penalties are now recovered, to be applied to the use of the
public schools of the proper district: Provided, That no penalty shall be recovered
under this act, unless sued for within one month after the same shall have occurred ;
nor shall any person recover more than one penalty for the working of any factory
-for the same period of time.
Szor. 3. All the ward, borough and township constables are hereby authorized
and required, and it is hereby made their duty, to attend to the strict observance
of the two preceding sections of this act, when complaint shall have been properly
made to them of a violation of the same.
Act 14 Aprin 1868. Purd. 1158.
Szor. 1. Hight hours of labor, between the rising and setting of the sun, shall
be deemed and held to be a legal day’s work, in all cases of labor and service by
the day, where there is no contract or agreement to the contrary.
Sxor. 2. This act shall not apply to or in any way affect farm or agricultural
labor or service by the year, month or week; nor shall any person be prevented,
by anything herein contained, from working as many hours over-time or extra work,
as he or she may see fit, the compensation to be agreed upon between the employer
and the employee.
Szor. 3. All other acts or parts of acts relating to the hours of labor which shall
constitute a day’s work in this state, are hereby repealed.
Tt seems, that it is an indictable offence at common law to overwork children in
a factory... Where, however, the statutory remedy is applicable to the case, the
act of 1860 provides that its directions shall be strictly pursued, and no penalty
shall be inflicted, nor anything done agreeable to the provisions of the common law,
further than shall be necessary for carrying the act into effect.?
If a statute prohibit a matter of public grievance, or command a matter of public
convenience, all acts or omissions contrary to the prohibition or commaud of the
statute, being misdemeanors at common law, are punishable by indictment, if
the statute specify no other mode of proceeding.
Act 1 June 1887. Purd. 865.
Sect. 1. At shall be unlawful for any person, persons, firms, companies, associations
or corporations, to employ any child under the age of twelve years to do any work in
or about any mill, manufactory or mine in this commonwealth.
Szcr. 2. Any person, persons or corporations, who may violate this act, shall, on
conviction, pay a fine of not less than twenty dollars, nor more than one hundred
dollars, at the discretion of the court. Said fines, arising from the violation of this
act, shall be paid to the treasury of the proper county, where said violation shall occur.
1 2 Twiss’s Life of Eldon 36, cited in 1 Whart. °1 Whart. Cr. L. 3 10, 13 S.4& R. 429 1
Cr. L. 2 3, note. Penn. St. 224,
2 Purd. 543.
FACTORIES. AAT
Act 3 Junz 1893. Purd. 865.
Sxcr. 1. No minor shall be employed at labor or detained in any manufacturing
establishment or mercantile industry, or any laundry or renovating establishments, for
a longer period than twelve hours in any day, nor for a longer period than sixty hours
in any week.
Sect. 2. No child under thirteen years of age shall be employed in any factory,
manufacturing or mercantile establishment. renovating works or laundry within thig
state. It shall be the duty of every person so employing children to keep a register
in which shall be recorded the name, birthplace, age and place of residence, name of
parent or guardian, and date when employment ceases, of every person so employed
by him under the age of sixteen years. And it shall be unlawful for any factory,
manufacturing or mercantile establishment to hire or employ any child under the age
of sixteen years, without there is first provided, and placed on file an affidavit made
by the parent or guardian, stating the age, date and place of birth of said child. If
said child have no parent or guardian, then such affidavit shall be made by the child,
which affidavit shall be kept on file by the employer, and which said register and affi-
davit shall be produced for inspection on demand by the inspector or any of the depu-
ties appointed under this act.
' Sect. 3. Every person, firm or corporation, employing women or children, or either,
in any factory, manufacturing or mercantile establishment, or renovating works or
laundry, shall post and keep posted, in a conspicuous place in every room where such
help is employed, a printed notice, stating the number of hours per day for each day
of the week required of such persons, and in every room where children under sixteen
years of age are employed, a list of their names with their age.
Sect. 4. No person, firm or corporation, employing less than five persons, shall be
deemed a factory, manufacturing or mercantile establishment, within the meaning of
this act.
Sect. 5. The governor shall, immediately after the passage of this act, appoint,
with the advice and consent of the senate, a factory inspector, at a salary of three
thousand dollars per year, whose term of -office shall be three years, at the expiration
of which the governor shall appoint his successor. The said inspector shall be em-
powered to visit and inspect at all reasonable hours and as often as practicable, the
factories, workshops and other establishments in the state employing women and
children. It shall also be the duties of said inspector to enforce the provisions of this
act and to prosecute all. violations of the same before any magistrate or any court of
competent jurisdiction in the state. It shall be the duty of the factory inspector to
report to the governor, on or before the thirtieth day of November of each year, the
names of factories inspected, the number of hands employed in each, the maximum
number of hours’ work performed each week. Of these reports five thousand shall
be published, five hundred of which shall be furnished to the governor, two thousand
to the house of representatives, one thousand to the senate, and fifteen hundred to the
factory inspector’s department.
Sect. 6. All necessary expenses incurred by said inspector in the discharge of his
duty shall be paid from the funds of the state, upon the presentation of proper
vouchers for the same: Provided, That not more than four thousand dollars shall be
expended by him therefor in any one year.
Srct. 7. It shall be the duty of the owner, agent or lessee of any such factory,
manufacturing or mercantile establishment, where hoisting shafts or well holes are
used, to cause the same to be properly and substantially enclosed or secured, if, in the
opinion of the inspector, it is necessary to protect the life or limbs of those employed
in such establishments. It shall be the duty of the owners, agent or lessee, to pro-
vide, or cause to be provided, such proper trap or automatic doors so fastened in or
at all elevator ways as to form a substantial surface when closed, and so constructed as
to open and close by action of the elevator in its passage either ascending or descending.
Sect. 8. It shall also be the duty of the owner of such factory, mercantile industry
or manufacturing establishment, or his agent, superintendent or other person in
charge of the same, to furnish and supply, or cause to be furnished and supplied, in
the discretion of the inspector, where dangerous machinery is in use, automatic
shifters, or other mechanical contrivances, for the purpose of throwing on or off belts
or pulleys. And no minor under sixteen years of age shall be allowed to clean machinery
while in motion. All gearing and belting shall be provided with proper safeguard.
Scr. 9. It shall be the duty of the owner or superintendent to report, in writing,
_to the factory inspector all accidents or serious injury done to any person employed
448 FACTORIES.
in such factory within twenty-four hours after the accident occurs, stating as fully as
possible the cause of such injury.
Sxcr. 10. A suitable and proper wash and dressing room and water-closets shall be
provided for females, where employed, and the water-closets' used by females shall not
adjoin those used by males, but shall be built entirely away from them, and shall be
properly screened and ventilated and at all times kept in a clean condition.
Sect. 11. Not less than forty-five minutes shall be allowed for the noonday meal
in any manufacturing establishment in this state. The factory inspector, his assistant
or any of his deputies, shall have power to issue permits in special cases, allowing a
shorter meal time at noon, and such permit must be conspicuously posted in the main
entrance of the establishment, and such permit may be revoked at any time the in-
spector deems necessary, and shall only be given where good cause can be shown.
Sect. 12. If the inspector of factories find that the heating, lighting, ventilation or
sanitary arrangement of any shop, or factory, is such as to be injurious to the health
of persons employed therein, or that the means of egress in case of fire or other dis-
aster is not sufficient or in accordance with all the requirements of law, or that the
belting, shafting, gearing, elevators, drums and machinery, in shops and factories are
located so as to be dangerous to employés and not sufficiently guarded, or that the
vats, pans or structures filled with molten metal or hot liquid are not surrounded with
proper safeguards for preventing accident or injury to those employed at or near
them, he shall notify the proprietor of such factory or workshop to make the alter-
ation or additions necessary within sixty days, and any factory requiring exits or other
safeguards provided for in fire-escape law in case of fire, the same shall be erected by
order of factory inspector’ regardless the exemption granted by any board of county
commissioners, fire marshals or other authorities, and if such alterations and additions
are not made within sixty days from the date of such notice, or within such time as
said alterations can be made with proper diligence upon the part of such proprietors,
said proprietors or agents shall be deemed guilty of violating the provisions of this act.
Sect. 13. The factory inspector, now or hereafter appointed under and by virtue of
the provisions of this law, is hereby authorized to appoint such number of persons as
in his judgment may be deemed necessary, not exceeding twelve, five of whom shall
be females, who shall be known as deputy factory inspectors, either or any one or
more of whom may be appointed to act as clerk in the main office, and whose duties
it shall be to enforce the provisions of this act and of the several acts relating to fac-
tories and manufacturing establishments. The powers of said deputies shall be the
same as the powers of the factory inspector, subject to the supervision and direction
of the factory inspector.
Sxcr. 14. The travelling expenses of each of said deputies shall be approved by the
inspector and audited by the auditor-general of the state before payment, and said
deputy inspectors shall have an annual salary of twelve hundred dollars, to be paid
monthly by the treasurer of the state out of any moneys not otherwise appropriated.
Sect. 15. Said factory inspector shall have power to divide the state into districts
and to assign one of said deputies to each district, and may transfer any of the depu-
ties to other districts in case the best interests of the state require it. The inspector
shall have the power of removing any of the deputy inspectors at any time.
Src. 16. An office shall be furnished in the capitol, as soon as practicable, which
shall be set apart for the use of the factory inspector. The factory inspector and his
deputies shall have the same power to administer oaths or affirmations as is now given
to notaries public in cases where persons desire to verify documents connected with
the proper enforcement of this act.
Sxcr. 17. Any person who violates any of the provisions of this act, or who suffers
or permits any child or female to be employed in violation of its provisions, shall be
deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and on conviction, shall be punished by a fine of
not more than five hundred dollars.
Sect. 18. A printed copy of this act shall be furnished by the inspector for each
work room of every factory, manufacturing or mercantile house, where persons are
employed who are affected by the provisions of this act, and it shall be the duty of
the employer of the people employed therein to post and keep posted said printed
copy of the law in each room.
Sect. 19. All the acts or parts of acts inconsistent with the provisions of this act
are hereby repealed. Approved the twentieth day of May, Anno Domini one thou-
sand eight hundred and eighty-nine.
[ 449 ]
Factors.
I. Act of assembly. II. Judicial decisions.
I. Aor 31 Maron 1860. Purd. 499.
Szor. 125. If any consignee or factor having the possession of merchandise, with
authority to sell the same, or having possession of any bill of lading, permit, certi-
ficate, receipt or order for the delivery of merchandise, with the like authority, shall
deposit, or pledge such merchandise or document, consigned or intrusted to him
as aforesaid, as a security for any money borrowed, or negotiable instrument
received by such consignee Or factor, and shall apply or dispose of the same to his
own use, in violation of good faith, with intent to defraud the owner of such
merchandise, and if any consignee or factor shall, with like fraudulent intent, apply
or dispose of, to his own use, any money or negotiable instrument, raised or acquired
by the sale, or other disposition of such merchandise, such consignee or factor, in
every such case, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and be sentenced to pay a fine
not exceeding two thousand dollars, and undergo an imprisonment, not exceeding
five years.
Nore.—Complaint, on oath or affirmation, being made to a magistrate that the above
law has been violated, he should issue a criminal warrant setting forth the offence charged ;
for example—‘ that A., the factor or consignee of B., having had 20 bales of cotton goods,
of the value of $4000, put into his possession by B., had, with intent to defraud said B.,
pledged or pawned said cotton goods, &e.’’ The defendant being brought up, and the
testimony heard, it then becomes the duty of the justice either to discharge, take bail, or
commit the defendant for trial at the next court of quarter sessions.
II. One who has consigned goods to a factor and received an advance thereon,
has the right, subsequently, to limit the prices at which they should be sold! But
the consignee may sell to repay advances, after calling on the principal for reim-
bursement, unless there be an agreement between them, which controls or varies
the right.2, Such an agreement may arise from accepting the consignment, accom-
panied by an order as to the sale.* The existence of a usage to sell to pay advances,
will not control an express contract between the parties as to the sale of the goods ;
and that the sale in violation of orders was made zn good faith, is not a valid excuse.‘
If the consignor stand ready to repay the advances, he may control the sale.
Where one has consigned goods to his factor, and received advances thereon, he
cannot withdraw them, without payment, or an offer to pay, not only the amount of
advances, but the commissions the factor would have been entitled to, if a sale had
been effected.6 Where goods are sent to a factor for sale without instructions as to
the time or terms of sale, he is at liberty to sell at such time and on such terms, as
in the exercise of a sound discretion he shall deem proper for the interest of his
principal? If a factor sell below his instructions, although at the then market
value, he takes a peril of a rise in the value of the goods at any time before the
action is brought, and perhaps down to the time of trial.®
It is an established principle in the law of principal and factor, that when the
latter renders an account of sales, the former should, with all reasonable diligence,
specify in what particular such account is exceptionable. If the principal retain
the account any unreasonable length of time, he is concluded from making objections,
but must be considered as acquiescing in the report of the factor’s transactions.?
One who holds himself out to the world as a consignee cannot ordinarily refuse,
without cause, to receive goods consigned to his care; and upon his refusal to
13 W.0.C.151. 3 N.Y. 62, 78. 5 14 Pet. 479.
215 Penn. St. 234. The factor may sell not- 6 1 Pars. 359
withstanding the service of an attachment. 54 %73N Y.62. 1Y. 486.
Thid. 84. § 3N. Y. 78
8 14 Pet. 479. 9 1 Pars. 359
4 15 Penn. St. 229.
29
450 FALSE IMPRISONMENT.
receive goods so consigned, the owner may maintain an action against him for any
damage occasioned by such refusal. .
Though a factor has a lien on the goods of his principal, yet he cannot retain
against the order of the principal a large portion of the goods, though he may
retain as much as will be sufficient to pay his debt.’ A factor can only claim a lien
on goods lawfully in his possession.® Although a warehouseman has not a general,
he has a specific lien, and therefore may, on the storage of a large quantity of goods
received under the same contract and belonging to the same individual, retain a
sufficient quantity to repay himself.‘ A warehouseman is liable only for negligence
in preserving the property deposited with him.®
A factor who discounts for his own use notes received in payment for the goods
of his principal, makes them his own, and becomes personally liable to his principal
for the amount of the sales.®
As to the lien of factors, see the act 14 April 1834, Purd. 867.
False lnnprisonmment.
Ir is false imprisonment to detain another by threats of violence to his person,
or to deprive him of the freedom of going where he will, by well-grounded appre-
hensions of personal danger, though no assault be made."
If a justice of the peace issue process for the arrest of a defendant, in a case in
which it is forbidden by law, he obtains thereby no jurisdiction of the person of the
defendant, all his proceedings in the case are null and void, and he renders himself
liable to an action for false imprisonment. Thus, where a justice issued a warrant
forsthe examination of a pauper, who was brought into court, examined, and
removed to another town, by order of the justice and another magistrate who sat
with him: for the reason that the warrant was delivered to, and served by a con-
stable of another town than that mentioned in the statute, though in the same
county, it was held, that the justice acquired no jurisdiction, and was liable in an
action for false imprisonment.®
In an action for a penalty, which is directed to be recovered as debts of like
amount are by law recoverable; the defendant is not liable to arrest; an execution,
therefore, in such case, authorizing the imprisonment of the person, is void, and the
defendant may be discharged on habeas corpus.”
For an arrest on a warrant, which sets forth no criminal offence, an action of
false imprisonment will lie; all persons acting under it are trespassers.” But an
action for false imprisonment will not lie, until the criminal proceedings are ended.
In such action, probable cause is no justification, it only goes on mitigation of
damages.
16W. &&. 62. 8 4.N. Y. 383-4.
21W. OC. OC. 252. 9 7 Cow. 269.
8 4N. Y. 497. 10 Martin’s Case, Com. Pleas, Phila., 15 April
47W.& S. 466. 1834. MS.
5 30 Penn. St. 247, 11 6 Phila, 541. 32 Alb. L. J. 471.
66W. 4&5. 44. 3 Penn. St. 323. 1221 W.N.C.9.
T Bald. 571. 18 34 Leg. Int. 305. And see 17 W. N.C. 210.
L 451 ]
False Personation.
Act 31 Marcy 1860. Purd. 529.
Szor. 16. If any person shall fraudulently and corruptly acknowledge, or procure
to be acknowledged, any deed, or any writing authorized to be acknowledged, or
any recognisance or judgment, in the name of any other person not privy thereto,
or consenting to the same, the person so offending shall be guilty of a misdemeanor,
and, on conviction, be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars, and
undergo an imprisonment, by separate or solitary confinement at labor, not exceeding
seven years.
FALSE PERSONATION was an offence at common law; where, in a capital case, a
stranger went into the jury box, and personated a juror who was summoned, it was
held to be ground for a new trial.1_ But in a civil case, it has been said, that where.
a person of a similar name innocently answered to that of a juror who had been
drawn, it was not necessarily ground for a new trial; it is matter of discretion?
If, however, a juror whose name was called as one of the panel, was personated by
some one whose name was not on the jury list, a new trial must be granted.
alse Pretences.
I. Cheats and frauds at common law. IV. Meaning of the words ‘any chattel, money,
II. Provisions of the Penal Code. or valuable security.”
III. Meaning of the words “by any false pre- V. Meaning of the words “ with intent to cheat
tence.” and defraud.”
I. A mere private imposition, short of felony, and effected by a “ naked lie,”
without the association of artful device, or false token, voucher, order, &c., is not.
indictable as a cheat at common law, unless it be public in its nature, and caleu-
lated to defraud numbers, or to injure the government or the public in general.*
Such are the following among other frauds. Those affecting the administration of
public justice, as counterfeiting a creditor’s authority to discharge his debtor from
prison,® or endangering the public health, by selling unwholesome provisions,
whether to the public generally,® or under a contract with the government for
supplies to particular bodies.’ So, in Pennsylvania, an indictment was sustained
against a baker in the employ of the United States army, in baking 219 barrels of
bread, and marking them as weighing 88 pounds each, when, in fact, they severally
weighed but 68 pounds.® Frauds calculated to affect all persons, as selling by false
weights and measures ;* counterfeiting tokens of public authenticity ;° playing with
false dice ;4 obtaining money from a soldier, on a false pretence of having power to
discharge him ;# or getting the bounty by enlisting as a soldier, being an apprentice,
liable to be retaken by a master,® have all been held indictable as cheats at
common law. But an indictment which charged that the defendant unlawfully and
fraudulently did give, enter and file of record a certain bond and warrant of attorney,
for $600, to P. D., without any consideration, and with intent to cheat and defraud
J. M. and other of his creditors, and that the defendant did cheat and defraud the
said J. M. and other of his creditors; was held to charge no offence indictable at
common law.
1 5 Clark 238. 7 2 Camp. 12,
2 35 Leg. Int. 163. 81 Dall. 47.
35 W.N. OC. 404. 91 Wz. BI. 273.
4 2 Hast P. C. 817, $21. Whart. Prec. 224. 4 10 Tremaine’s P. C. 103.
Clark 207, 5 Penn. St. 60. 2 Cr.C.C.60. 4 Ibid. 1 1 Dall. 338.
83, 22 Latch 202.
2
5 2 Hast P. C. 826, 862. 18 2 Hast P. C. 822.
§ Tbid. 821. 14 2 Clark 297.
452 FALSE PRETENCES.
To remedy this imperfection of the common law, sundry statutes have been en-
acted in England and in the United States; which, in Pennsylvania, are embodied
in the 111th and 112th sections of the revised Penal Code.
II. Act 31 Marcu 1860. Purd. 504.
Sxor. 111. If any person shall, by any false pretence, obtain the signature of
any person to any written instrument, or shall obtain from any other person any
chattel, money or valuable security, with intent to cheat and defraud any person of
the same, every such offender shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and, on conviction,
be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars, and undergo an im-
prisonment not exceeding three years: Provided always, That if upon the trial of
any person indicted for such a misdemeanor, it shall be proved that he obtained the
property in question in such manner as to amount in law to larceny, he shall not,
by reason thereof, be entitled to be acquitted of such misdemeanor; and no person
tried for such misdemeanor shall be liable to be afterwards prosecuted for larceny
upon the same facts.
Sxcr. 112. If any person, with intent to cheat or defraud, shall by any false or
fraudulent representations, or by any false show of baggage, goods or chattels, which
are calculated to deceive any hotel, inn or boarding-house keeper, obtain lodging
and credit in any hotel, inn or boarding-house, and shall subsequently refuse to pay
for his board and lodging, the person so offending shall be guilty of a misdemeanor,
and on conviction, be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding one hundred dollars,
or undergo an imprisonment not exceeding three months, or both, or either, at the
discretion of the court.
Aor 20 Aprit 1876. Purd. 504.
Szor. 1. Every person who shall, at any hotel or inn, or boarding-house, receive,
or cause to be furnished, any food or accommodations, with intent to defraud the
owner or proprietor of such hotel, inn or boarding-house, out of the value or price
of such food or accommodation, and every person who shall obtain credit at any
hotel, inn or boarding-house, by the use of any false pretences or device, or by
depositing at such hotel, inn or boarding-house, any baggage or property of value
less than the amount of such credit, or of the bill ‘by such person incurred, with
such fraudulent intent, and any person who, after obtaining credit or accommoda-
tion at any hotel, inn or boarding-house, shall abscond from such hotel, inn or
boarding-house, and shall surreptitiously remove his baggage or property there-
from,’ shall [upon conviction] be adjudged guilty of a misdemeanor; and upon
conviction, shall be punished by imprisonment in the county jail for a term of not
more than six months.
III. By any false pretence——The term “‘ false pretence’? is very general and
includes ‘false token or writing,” and every extortion of money or goods with
intent to defraud.?
Where a carrier, falsely pretending that he had carried certain goods to A. B.,
demanded and thereupon obtained from the consignor 16 shillings for the carriage
of them, it was held to be within the statute.’ Where the foreman of a manufac-
turer, who was in the habit of receiving from his master money to pay the work-
men, obtained from him, by means of false written accounts of the wages earned by
the men, more than the men had earned, or he had paid them, it was held to be
within the act; the judges said that all cases where the false pretence creates the credit
are within the statute. Where the defendant falsely pretended to J. N. that he
was intrusted by the Duke de Lauzun to take some horses from Ireland to London
for him, and that; he had been detained so long by contrary winds that his money
was all spent; by means of which representation he induced J. N. to advance him
money, this was held to be within the act.’ So, where defendants, falsely pretend-
ing that they had made a bet with A. B. that one of them should run ten wiles
within an hour, prevailed upon J. N.to join them in the bet, and obtained from
1 See 6 Luz. L. Reg. 207. 2 East P. C. 830.
23 Chit. Cr. L. 997. 4 Olark 20. 2 Pars. 332. 3 T.R. 104,
3 2 East P. C. 672. ign ae
ao
FALSE PRETENOES. 458
him 20 guineas as his share in it: held to be within the statute, though the pre-
tence were one against which common prudence might have guarded.'
If a person obtain goods from another on giving him in payment his check on a
banker, with whom in fact he has no account, this (though not indictable as a fraud
at common law) is a false pretence within the meaning of the act.2 Where a
man obtained goods and money for a forged note of hand for 10s. 6d., it was held
to be a false pretence within the act.* It will not avail the defendant that the pre-
tence consists in a false representation of something to take place at a future time,
as that a bet had been laid that a certain pedestrian feat would be performed, as in
the case referred to above.t
If a person procure a tradesman to sell him goods as for ready money, and direct
him to send his servant with them to his lodgings, and there deliver fabricated bills
in payment, retaining the goods, he may be found guilty of obtaining them under
false pretences. And a begging Jetter, making false representations as to the con-
dition and character of the writer, by means of which money is obtained, is a false
pretence within the statute.®
Every false promise or assertion made by a party with a view of fraudulently
obtaining the property of another, is not, of course, a false pretence within the act ;
but the false pretences in the contemplation of the statute, are such as assert the
existence of some fact calculated to impose upon a man of common and ordinary
caution, which false pretence creates the credit given to the accused.’ The pur-
chase of goods, for which the buyer is unable to pay, although his promise was
specious and fair, also false when made, does not constitute a false pretence within
the act.? A false pretence, within the statute, must relate to past, and not future
events ;® but the false assertion of possession of money or property, on the credit
whereof goods are obtained, is within the act.” It is certain, that a fraudulent
misrepresentation of the party’s means and resources is within the English statutes,
and @ fortiort within our own." It has been held, however, not to extend to a false
representation of the quality of goods, on which an advance of money is obtained,
if they be the same in specie as represented.’
The following have been held to be false pretences within the statute: where the
keeper of an intelligence office, by falsely pretending he had a situation in view,
induced the prosecutor to pay him two dollars asa premium; where a person
obtained goods under the false pretence that he lived with and was employed by
A. B., who sent him for them; and falsely to represent the notes of a broken bank
to be good.
But an indictment will not lie when the money is parted with as a charitable
donation, although the pretences moving the gift be false and fraudulent, as where
the defendant pretended he was deaf and dumb, and obtained alms by that means,
and by a forged certificate.6 And where a person got possession of a promissory
note, by pretending he wanted to look at it, and then carried it away, and refused
to deliver it to the holder, it was held to be a mere private fraud, and not punish-
able criminally."
It is not necessary that the pretence should be in words; the conduct and acts
of the party will be sufficient, without any verbal assertion.’* Where a man assumed
the name of another to whom money was required to be paid by a genuine instru-
ment, it was held indictable® And where a person, at Oxford, who was not a
member of the university, went, for the purpose of fraud, wearing a commoner’s
cap and gown, and obtained goods, it was held within the act, though not a word
passed.”
It is not necessary to allege a scienter, when the defendant must, necessarily,
have been conscious of the falsity of his own statement ; but the defendant may
137, RB. 98, 11 2 Penn. St. 164, Gibson, C. J.
2 3 Camp. 370. 8 Phila. 609. 127 Cox C. C. 313. 8 Ibid. 233.
8 2 Russ. Cr. 1395. 18 Thacher’s C. C. 24.
43T. RB. 98. 4 12 Johns, 292.
5 2 Leach C. C. 614. 15 4 Mete. 48.
6 4 Cox CO. C. 198. 16 17 Wend. 351.
7 2 Pars. 309. 1 14 Johns. 371,
8 Ibid. 317. 18.2 Pars. 332.
919 Pick. 179. 6 Phila. 78. 19 R. & R. 81.
10 2 Penn. St. 163. 1 Clark 302. 20 Tbid.
454 FALSE PRETENCES.
show on the trial, that he did not know that his assertions were untrue in fact.?
It is no less a false pretence because the party imposed upon might, by common
prudence, have avoided the imposition.”
Where the secretary of an Odd Fellows’ Society falsely pretended to a member
of the society that a sum of money was due by him to the society for fines, by
means of which the secretary fraudulently obtained that amount from him, it was
held, to be a false pretence within the statute.? So, passing: off a flash note, as a
Bank of England note, on a person unable to read, and obtaining from him goods
in exchange for it, is a false pretence.* And where it was the duty of a servant, in
the absence of his masters’ chief clerk, to purchase and pay for, on behalf of his
masters, any kitchen stuff brought to their premises for sale; and on one occasion,
he falsely stated to the chief clerk that he had paid 2s. 3d. for kitchen stuff which
he had bought for his masters, and demanded to be paid for it ; whereupon the clerk
paid him the amount out of money which his masters had furnished him with for
that purpose; and the defendant applied the money to his own use; held, that this
did not amount to larceny, but was a false pretence within the statute.’ But a mere
naked lie, in the transaction of business, does not constitute a false pretence; it
must be a false statement, calculated to deceive a mind of ordinary caution and
intelligence, and upon which the credit is given, and this should be clear to the
justice to justify a binding over.’ But any pretence sufficient to impose on
the individual to whom it is made, is an offence, if used with the intention to cheat
and defraud.’ If the false statements were made on different occasions, it is a
question for the jury whether they are so connected as to form one continuing
representation.®
A professed intent to do an act which the party did not mean to do, is the only
species of false pretence to gain property which is not indictable? A representa-
tion that the party could or would do a particular act, as that he could or would get
a bill discounted, though he knew he could not, is not a false pretence within the
act, but rather a breach of promise, and the false pretence must be of the existence
of some fact.’
IV. Any chattel, money or valuable security.—These words include bonds, mort-
gages, promissory notes, bills of exchange, bank-notes, all securities and orders for
the payment of money or the transfer of goods or any valuable thing whatever.”
A receipt obtained in discharge of a debt, which was paid with the worthless
note of a broken bank, is not such property or valuable thing as is contemplated
by the act. If the defendant had obtained any money or merchandise, or anything
of value from the prosecutor, his case would be within the provisions of the act;
but as the receipt was for a preceding debt, if that receipt was obtained by fraudu-
lent misrepresentations, and without value, it was neither a cheat at common law or
within the statute. Paying an old debt with base coin, or a worthless note, is no
payment, and the person receiving the base coin or the worthless note, has the same
remedy at least to recover his debt that he had before the alleged payment took
place. The debt was not extinguished by the receipt ; it was not the obtaining of
money or goods by a false token or pretence; it was a fruitless attempt to pay and
discharge an old account.
If the subject-matter of the charge be land and the title to it, and the depriving
of the owner of it by cheating, the offence is not indictable at common law or under
the statute,” unless the signature of the person defrauded be obtained, by such false
pretence, to some instrument of writing.”
1 Whart. Prec. 3 528 n. St. 574. 28 Leg. Int. 310.
2 22 Penn. St. 253. i 3 Chit. Cr. L. 998. It includes the obtaining
8 4 Cox C. C. 191. of a registered letter from the post-office, by false
4 Thid. 227. pretences. 2 Leg. Gaz, 93.
5 2 Den. C. C. 59, 12 8 Penn. St. 260.
6 8 Phila. 613. 9 Ibid. 594. 1 Clark 436. 2 1 Ibid. 264. And this would not be larceny
Ibid. 6. though the receipt were written on a stamp pro-
1 2 Pars. 332. duced by the prisoner. 5 Cox 0. C. 533. And
8 6 Cox C. C. 158. see 2 Chest. Co. R. 638. 15 W. N. C. 282.'
9 2 Penn. St. 164. M4 4 Clark 207.
20 1 Chit. Pract. 124. 1 Clark 302. 99 Penn. 1 See 8 Penn. St. 260. 5 Cox C. C. 533.
FEES. 455
V. With intent to cheat and defraud.—No indictment will lie where the false
pretence, if successful, will neither cheat nor defraud; nor should an intent to
defraud be even implied in such a case. Therefore, where a constable, by means
of false pretences, collected the amount of a judgment from the defendant against
whom it was rendered, it was held, that an indictment under the act of 12th July
1842 could not be sustained, because he neither cheated nor defrauded thereby
but only obtained payment of an honest debt.’ False representations, inducing one
to pay a debt he justly owes, are not indictable. A false representation warrants
the inference of an attempt to defraud.* An indictment will not lie, in New York
for obtaining money by false pretences, where the money is given in charity,
though there be fraud in procuring it.‘ Ifthe accused can show to the satisfaction
of the jury that he did not know that his assertion of facts was untrue, it might
avail him as a defence to the allegation of an intention to cheat and defraud, for
that is the essence of the charge.® The intention to defraud must exist at the time
when the credit is given.®
The commonwealth must prove that the representations, or some of them, were
false ; that the prisoner knew them to be so; that they were made with intent to
defraud; and that in pursuance thereof, the defendant obtained the property
described.’ A married woman cannot be convicted of obtaining goods by false pre-
tence, if the prosecutor knew, at the time, that she was covert.®
Act 19 May 1887. Purd. 505.
Every person who, by false pretence, shall obtain from any club, association, society
or company for improving the breed of cattle, horses, sheep, swine or other domestic
-animals, the registration of any animal in the herd register, or other register of any
such club, association, society or company, or a transfer of any such registration, and
every person who shall knowingly give a false pedigree of any animal, upon conviction
thereof, shall be punished by imprisonment in a county jail for a term not exceeding
one year, or by fine not exceeding one thousand dollars, or by both such fine and im-
prisonment.
ee
Fees.
[See Exrortion. |
I. Fees of justices and magistrates. III. Illegal fees.
II. Fees of constables.
I. FEES OF JUSTICES AND MAGISTRATES.
Act 23 May 1893. Purd. 890.
‘Sect. 1. There shall be uniformity throughout the commonwealth in the charges
of justices of the peace, aldermen, magistrates and constables, and their fees shall be
as follows, to wit: That from and after the passage of this act the fees of justices of
the peace, magistrates and aldermen, shall be:
Dolls, Cts.
For information or complaint on behalf of the commonwealth . . »- . 650
Docket-entry of action on behalf of the commonwealth . . « . . 25
Warrant, mittimus or capias on behalf of the commonwealth . . - =. 50
Writing an examination or confession of defendant . . : i <8 . 50
Hearingincriminaleases » + eee
Administering oath or affidavit in criminal or civil cases. ‘ Bee - 10
Taking recognizancein criminal case. . «© + «© «© «© «» «= 80
Transcript in criminal cases, including certificate ‘ ; a. av. ee le. ©b0
Entering judgment on conviction for fine. «© 2.» ew ee eS
Recording conviction - 6 eee
1 Clark 33. 5 Whart. Prec. 528 n.
23 Hill 169. 6 2 Clark 10.
313 Wend. 87. 71 Brewst. 328.
417 Ibid. 351. $15 Phila. 386.
456 FEES,
: Dolls. Cts.
Warrant to levy fine or forfeiture . . . bo te F : - 80
Bail piece and return swpersedeas . «© + ‘ F . . . « 30
Discharge of jailer . ‘ . z . r 35
Entering discontinuance in case of an ‘aasault and battery - - . 5 - 60
Entering complaint of master, mistress or an apprentice . . i ‘ 30
Notice to master. mistress or apprentice. he . . « 25
Hearing parties . ‘ » 50
Holding inquisition under landlord and tenant act, or in case of forcible entry,
each day, each justice . : ‘ m ‘ . a 7 : - 200
Process, et cetera, to sheriff, each justice . . . . . . 75
Recording proceedings, each justice . . . . . . - 150
Writ of restitution, each justice eee
Warrant to appraise damages . ‘ 7 . . * - 80
Warrant to sell strays. . « oP as Me a aay er 80
Warrant to appraise swine. =. ea ep ep at) 985.
Receiving and entering return of appraisement of swine . 7 ‘i . - 25
Publishing proceedings of appraisers of swine . ‘ ‘ 5 7 » 7
Entering action in civil case : : . : . . . 2
Summons or subpoena . ‘ : a 4 j . 25
Capias in civil case. 50
Every additional name after the first, all witnesses’ names to be i in one e subpeena
unless separate subpcenas be i by the parties . é ; . 10
Subpoena duces tecum , . . : 7 . - 3 , - 2
Entering return of summons é ‘ é ‘ F z F i es)
Entering capiasand bail bond .. : OL “en na Ke oe «25
Every continuance of a suit : RR RR eR » 6 « 20
Trial and judgment in case . "i $ . a ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ - 650
Taking bail or plea of freehold . e. A o> Has Ae ‘ a ce 25
Entering satisfaction . ‘ ‘i ‘ F . . 7 7 . : . 425
Entering discontinuance of suit. . eo 8 Ro isis 1 «ce os 1b
Entering amicable suit . 5 i . ‘ - - 650
Entering rule to take deposition of witnesses te Toe a SEB
Rule to take depositions r ee : ‘ . . . » 2
Entering return of rule in any case . a ‘ . < i ‘ 15
Interrogatories annexed to rule to take depositions ee es tu - 25
Entering rule to refer . W 18 ‘ ue al. ca! co. cal tay 18
Rule of reference ; ‘ . : ‘ A ‘ ‘ ‘ a i . 25
Notice to each referee : Ss Oi Ce C8 cle OE
Entering report of referees and judgment thereon BE flay a . e- oe “30
Written notice in any case . . . . 5 . . ‘ . . . 25
Execution . ‘ : - : , ; é : 7 : - 80
Entering return of execution 3 : ‘ : 7 . . . . 15
Scire facias in any case. ; ey 4 1 te ia, wey ear SSO
Opening judgment for a rahoieiig . 5 a ; . : 5 : - 25
Transcription of judgment and certificate . , »~ ». 650
Return of proceedings on certiorari or appeals, including recognizances fs - 100
Receiving the amount of a judgment and paying the same ee if not exceed-
ing ten dollars . : ‘é ‘ ‘ ‘ » 25
If exceeding ten, and not exceeding forty dollars : : i , < . 50
If exceeding forty, and not exceeding sixty dollars . te cate Jim. mie ues AED
If exceeding sixty, and not exceeding one hundred dollars : . 7 - 100
And a like amount on each one hundred up to three hundred.
Every search service to which no fees are attached . $ ; 5 . » 20
Affidavit in case of attachment . ‘ F 5 ‘ i 7 ‘i . » 80
Entering action in case of attachment Sie 2 i . 7 ‘ 7 » 2
Attachmentin any case. 5 js ‘ . ‘ . ; ° . » 385
Recognizance . «wee ele sC«
Interrogatories . et we. %% R> son ter ek - = & 80
Rule on garnishee ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ : 3 ‘ ¢ Fi ‘ » 25
Return of rule on garnishee i ‘ eo 8 a oe “ee ow | (328
FEES. 457
Dolls. Cts.
Bond in case of attachment ‘ ah eh 50
Entering return and appneanee frecholders ge cep. it ae, Me? ae?
Advertisement, each . : : ‘i ° m é 7 8 . 25
Order to sell goods 4 : fe Fey yarn “dn Aut Fe » 35
Order for the relief of a pauper, "eaoh justice ‘ e- Js- da iar ibe
Entering transcript of judgment from another justice or alderman are 50
Order for the removal of a pauper, each justice or alderman » ». « 100
Order to seize goods for the maintenance of wife and children . ‘ . 60
Order for premium for wolf, fox or other scalps, to be paid by the county. - 25
Every acknowledgment or probate of deed, or other instrument of writing, for
first name . : ’ : : : ; : » « 50
Each additional name after the first : . 25
Taking and signing acknowledgment of indenture of : an epprentice ~ «+ 650
Assignment and making record of indenture. : ~ oe ehh «CBO
Cancelling indenture ‘ 50
Comparing and signing tax duplicates, each alderman 75
Marrying each couple, making record thereof and certificates to ‘the nario - 500
Certificate of approbation of two justices to the binding as apprentice of a per-
son by the directors of the poor, each ee ‘ ; ‘ i ‘ 35
Certificate to obtain land warrant 75
Swearing or affirming county einaiesioner assessor, director oe the poor, or
other township officer, or county officer, and certificate . , . - 650
Administering oaths or affirmations in any case not herein ndet for . » 25
Justifying parties on bonds for tavern licenses . 1 00
Entering complaint in landlord and tenant proceedings, wet one ‘thousand ‘eight
hundred and thirty . 25
Issuing process in landlord and tenant proceedings, act one ; thousand ‘eight hun-
dred and thirty 25
Hearing and determining case in ‘landlord and tenant proceedings, act one ‘thou-
sand eight hundred and thirty . 50
Record of proceedings in landlord and tenant “proceedings, act one thousand
eight hundred and thirty - 50
Writ of possession (and return) in landlord and tenant ‘proceedings, act one
thousand eight hundred and thirty . é 50
When more than one magistrate is required in landlord and tenant proceedings
the above fees shall be charged by each magistrate.
Entering complaint in landlord and tenant proceedings, act one thousand eight
hundred and sixty-three . 75
Issuing process in landlord and tenant proceedings, act one thousand eight hun-
dred and sixty-three. 75
Hearing and determining case, act one » thousand eight hundred and sixty-three 1 00
Record of proceedings, act one thousand eight hundred and sixty-three 1 50
Issuing writ of restitution (and return), act one thousand eight hundred and
sixty-three . - 100
The fees for services under the laws of the United States shall be as ‘follows:
For certificate of protection eR ie ke Bs fas Ow es cae TBO
For certificate of lost protection ag. See. Ge i> fe : - 25
Warrant . .. y ee ol “i Tar, te : . » 25
Commitment . * os 4 4 « 25
Summons for seamen in n admiralty case. le em ee eae 25
Hearing thereon with docket-entry . » .« 50
For certificate to clerk of the district court to issue admiralty process & os F265
For affidavits of claims and copies thereof . 25
The fees for services not herein specially provided, ‘shall be the same as for
similar services.
TI. FEES OF CONSTABLES.
Act 23 May 1893. Purd. 886.
Sxcr. 2. From and after the passage of this act the fees to be received by consta-
bles in this commonwealth shall be as follows:
458 FEES.
Dolls, Cts.
For executing warrant on behalf of the commonwealth . - 5 - 100
For taking body into custody, or conveying to jail on mittimus or warrant . 100
For arresting a vagrant, disorderly person, or other offender against the laws
(without process), and bringing before a justice . ; mes -
For levying a fine or forfeiture on a warrant. a, ve ; : ‘ - 50
For serving subpoena 4 50
For taking the body into custody, or mittimus where dail i is afterwards entered
before the prisoner is delivered to the jailer . F - 100
For serving summons notices on reference suitor, master or mistress, or appren-
tice personally, each i ; ; 3 ‘ 5 . 50
For serving by leaving acopy . oN o 4 eo é » 50
For executing attachment personally ee os os we OH : . 50
For arresting on capias_ . 3 : : . 100
For taking bail bond on capias or for delivery of goods a 50
For notifying plaintiff where defendant has been arrested on capias to be paid
by plaintiff . ‘ : : ‘ i is . é - . 25
For executing landlord’s warrants ‘ ‘ ‘i . - : : ‘ 50
For taking inventory of goods (each item) ‘ 2
For levying or distraining goods and selling the eame, for each dollar not ex-
ceeding one hundred dollars. é . 5 ‘ . : ‘ 3
And for each dollar above one hundred dollars 5 : 2
And one-half of said commission shall be allowed where the money is 5 paid after
levy without sale, but no commission shall in any case be taken on more
than the real debt, and then only for the money actually received by the
constable and paid over to the creditor.
For advertising the same . : : ‘ ¢ - 100
For copy of venue paper when demanded (each item) 3 2
For putting up notice of distress at mansion-house, or at any other place 1 on the
premises 3 ‘ a 6 ‘ . ‘ " : é 25
For serving scire facias personally é . i é é 7 ‘ ; ‘ a)
For serving by leaving a copy . . .i : ‘ ‘ . : . 50
For executing bail piece. ‘ 1 00
For travelling expenses on an execution returned null owes ee non eat in-
ventus where the constable has been at the defendant’s last residence,
each mile. j é ‘ - a ‘ ‘ 10
For travelling expenses in all other cases, each mile ‘ . . 5 é 7 10
For executing order for the removal of a pauper i i : E » 75
For travelling expenses in said removal, each mile circular . i 3 ». 4b
For serving execution : ; i : : i 50
For serving execution on a writ of restitution s s 6 - . ‘ . 200
For serving execution on a writ of possession. . ® . - . 200
For serving summons in landlord and tenant proceedings : . . . - 100
For serving notice in landlord and tenant proceedings ve. % ae - 650
For taking inventory of goods on an execution (each item) ‘ ‘ ‘ 2
For serving search warrant . 5 : . . ; . z < - 100
For serving capias execution i js s . - 100
Constable and appraisers personally, each, ¢ on appraisement ‘ 5 . 100
Act 19 May 1887. Purd. 887.
Jurors, witnesses and constables attending the several courts of this commonwealth,
or any other persons who by law are required to travel to the county seat, and who,
under existing laws, are entitled to mileage, shall have the same computed by the
route usually travelled in going from the points or places where said jurors, witnesses,
constables or other persons may respectively reside to the county seat, whether that
route be by the public highways, railroads or otherwise: Provided, That in no case
shall more mileage be allowed than for the miles actually travelled.
III. ILLEGAL FEEs.
Act 28 Marcn 1814. Purd. 879.
Srcr. 26. If any officer whatsoever shall take greater or other fees than is herein:
FEES. 459
before expressed and limited for any service to be done by him, after the first day of
September next, in his office, or if any officer shall charge or demand and take any of
the fees hereinbefore ascertained, where the business for which such fees are charge-
able shall not have been actually done and performed, or if any officer shall charge or
demand any fee for any service or services other than those expressly provided for by
this act, such officer shall forfeit and pay to the party injured, fifty dollars, to be re-
covered as debts of the same amount are recoverable. And if the judges of any court
within this commonwealth, shall allow any officer, under any pretence whatsoever,
any fees under the denomination of compensatory fees, for any services not specified
in this act or some other act of assembly, it shall be considered misdemeanor in office.
Act 11 Aprin 1850. Purd. 880.
Szcr. 9. Nothing in the 26th section of an act establishing a fee-bill, passed on the
28th day of March 1814, shall be deemed or taken to impose upon any sheriff, deputy-
sheriff or constable, any penalty for taking the fee for service, or copy of any writ of
summons, or other original process, at the time of receiving such process to be served.
Act 28 Marcu 1814. Purd. 880.
Szcr. 27. It shall and may be lawful for any person to refuse payment of fees to
any officer, who will not make out a bill of particulars, as prescribed by this act,
signed by him, if required, and also a receipt or discharge signed by him, of the fees
paid,
Act 22 Fesruary 1821. Purd. 880.
Scr. 15. The provisions of the 26th and 27th sections of the act passed the 28th
of March 1814, entitled “An act establishing a fee-bill,’’ are hereby re-enacted and
declared to be in as full force as if herein recited: Provided, that no action shall be
sustained by virtue thereof, or by virtue of the 14th section of this act, unless the
same shall be brought within six months after the cause of action shall have ac-
crued: And provided also, That it shall be lawful for the recorder of deeds and
register of wills to receive the fees for recording the same, at the time the deed or
deeds, will or wills, are left at his office for recording, any law or usage to the contrary
notwithstanding.
Act 28 Marcu 1820. Purd. 880.
Sect. 3. In all cases where any constable shall collect or receive the debt, interest
and costs, or any part thereof, of any execution, it shall be his duty to'make out and
deliver to the defendant or defendants in such an execution, a bill of particulars of his
fees and charges, together with a receipt, signed by him, for the same, if paid; and
if any constable shall neglect or refuse, upon application to him made by the party
interested, to give such bill or receipt, he shall, for such neglect or refusal, forfeit and
pay the sum of ten dollars, to be recovered in the manner and for the use prescribed
in the act to which this is a supplement.
Act 22 Frpruary 1821. Purd. 880.
Szcr. 14. All officers whose fees are by this act and by the act entitled “ An act to
establish a fee bill,’’ passed the 28th March 1814, ascertained, limited and appointed,
shall and are hereby required to make fair tables of their respective fees according to
the said acts, and to publish and keep up the same in their respective offices, within
six months after the passing of this act, in some conspicuous part, for the inspection
of all persons who shall have business in said offices. And if any such officer shall
neglect to publish and keep up a table of the fees. in his office as aforesaid, in such
case, such officer shall pay to any person aggrieved the sum of ten dollars, together
with double the amount of the excess of fees, if any, which such person may have
paid to the said officer, to be recovered with costs of suit, by action of debt, in the
same manner as other debts are by law recoverable.
Act 31 Marcu 1860. Purd. 881.
Sscr. 12. If any justice, clerk, prothonotary, sheriff, coroner, constable or other
officer of this commonwealth, shall wilfully and fraudulently receive or take any re-
460 FEMALES.
ward or fee to execute and do his duty and office, but such as is or shall be allowed by
some act of assembly of this commonwealth ; or shall receive or take, by color of his
office, any fee or reward whatever, not, or more than is allowed as aforesaid ; he shall
be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor in office, and on conviction, be sentenced to pay a
fine not exceeding five hundred dollars, or to undergo an imprisonment, not exceeding
one year.
Pemales,
[See Inrants.]
By article x. section 3 of the constitution of 1874, women twenty-one years of age and
upwards are made eligible to any office of control or management under the school laws
of this state. The act 14th April 1893,’ declares them to be eligible to the office of
notary-public. By the act 16th April 1850,? females are permitted to vote by proxy
at bank elections.
The act 8th February 1819 * provides that no female shall be arrested or imprisoned
for or by reason of any debt contracted after the passage of that act. This provision
was re-enacted by the 6th section of the act 13th June 1836. Women are not relieved
from arrest for debt by the act 12th July 1842, but by the act of 1819, and therefore
a warrant of arrest cannot issue against a female.*
The act 22d March 1887° provides that seats shall be provided for female employés,
and the second section punishes a violation of the act by a fine of not less than twenty-
five, nor more than fifty dollars.
The act 2d June 1891° prohibits the employment of females in anthracite mines,
and the act 15th April 1893" prohibits their employment in bituminous mines. See
also the act 30th June 1885.°
The act 4th June 1879° provides for the employment of female physicians in insane
hospitals who shall have control of female inmates, such physicians to be appointed
for a term not exceeding five years.
The act 14th April 1893 provides that insane female patients shall have a female
attendant when in transit.
The act 22d May 1879" forbids the attendance of female waiters in places of amuse-
ment and the act 28th March 1878” forbids their employment in inns, taverns or
eating houses, or places where liquors are sold.
SF enees.
Act 11 Marcu 1842. Purd. 904.
Sect. 1. In addition to the duties now imposed upon the township auditors, they
shall hereafter perform the duties hereinafter prescribed as fence-viewers. In addi-
tion to the oath now prescribed to be taken by the auditors, they shall annually be
sworn or affirmed to discharge their duties as such viewers, faithfully and impartially.
Sect. 2. In case of the death, removal or resignation of any fence-viewers and
auditors, so elected, the judges of the court of the proper county shall appoint a suit-
able person to fill the vacancy, for the unexpired term of the person whose place is
vacant.
Scr. 3. When any two persons shall improve lands adjacent to each other, or
where any person shall enclose any land adjoining to another’s land already fenced in,
so that any part of the first person’s fence becomes the partition-fence between them,
in both these cases, the charge of such division-fence, so far as is enclosed on both
sides, shall be equally borne and maintained by both parties.
1 Purd. 1607. 7 Purd. 1372,
i Ibid. 186. 8 Tbid. 902.
Ibid. 67. 9 Ibid. 992.
417Tr. & H. Pr. 3 241. 10 Tbid. 1259.
5 Purd. 902. 11 Thid. 105.
6 Thid. 1351. 12 Thid. 1022.
FENCES. 461
Sect. 4. On notice given, the said viewers shall, within five days thereafter, view
and examine any line fence, as aforesaid, and shall make out a certificate in writing,
setting forth whether, in their opinion, the fence of’ one has been already built, is
sufficient, and if not, what proportion of the expense of building a new or repairing the
old fence, should be borne by each party, and in each case, they shall set forth the °
sum which, in their judgment, each party ought to pay to the other, in case he shall
repair or build his proportion of the fence, a copy of which certificate shall be deliv-
ered to each of the parties; and the said viewers shall receive the sum of one dollar
for every day necessarily spent by them, in the discharge of their duties, which they
shall be entitled to receive from the delinquent party, or in equal sums from each, as
they shall decide to be just.
Szcr. 5. If the party who shall be delinquent in making or repairing of any fence,
shall not, within ten days after a copy of the certificate of the viewers shall have been
delivered to him, proceed to repair or build the said fence, and complete the same in
a reasonable time, it shall be lawful for the parties agerieved to repair or build the
said fence ; and he may bring suit before any justice of the peace or alderman against
the delinquent party, and recover, as in other actions, for work, labor, service done
and materials found ; and either party may appeal from the decision of the justice or
alderman, as in other cases.
Szcr. 6. The said viewers shall not be called out to view any fence between the Ist
day of November and the 1st day of April of the next year.
Szcr. 7. If any viewer shall neglect or refuse to perform any duty herein enjoined
upon him, he shall pay for each such neglect or refusal the sum of three dollars, to be
recovered by the party aggrieved as debts of a like amount are recoverable.
Sct. 8. A majority of the viewers in each township shall be a quorum, and shall
have power to do all the duties herein assigned.
Act 11 Marcw 1862. Purd. 905.
Scr. 1. The board of surveyors and regulators of the city of Philadelphia shall, in
addition to the duties now imposed upon them, perform the duties hereinafter pre-
scribed as fence-viewers; that in addition to the oath now prescribed to be taken by
the said surveyors and regulators, they shall be sworn or affirmed to discharge their
duties as such viewers, faithfully and impartially.
Sect. 2. On application made to the said board of surveyors and regulators, the
president shall, at the first meeting of said board thereafter, appoint three members
thereof, who shall, within five days thereafter, proceed to view and examine any line
or partition-fence, and shall make out a certificate in writing, setting forth whether,
in their opinion, the fence, if one has been already built, is lawful or otherwise; and
if not lawful, or if no fence is built upon said line, then stating what proportion of
cost, repairing the old or building a new fence, should be borne by each party; and in
each case they shall set forth the sum each party ought to pay to the other, in case he
should build or repair the other party’s portion of said fence, a copy of which certifi-
cate shall be delivered to each of the parties ; and they shall also present to the said
board, at the next stated meeting thereafter, a report of their proceedings, which
report, if approved by said board, after hearing of the parties interested, shall be
final and conclusive.
Szcr. 3. All partition-fences dividing enclosed lands within the rural districts of
the said city of Philadelphia, shall be substantially made, at least four feet six inches
high, and of sufficient rails or logs, the bottom rail or log to be not more than eight
inches above the ground; and in the built-up portions of said city, a tight board or
palisade fence, substantially built, at least six feet high; and in either case, the said
viewers and board of surveyors and regulators shall have power to designate the kind
of fence to be built: Provided, The cost in the rural districts shall not exceed twelve
cents per lineal foot, and in the built-up portions of said city, not exceeding twenty-
five cents per lineal foot.
Sxcr. 4. In all cases where a building shall be a part of such party-fence, the owner
of the ground on which such building is erected, shall be allowed for so much of said
bujlding as forms part of the partition, as part of his share of the whole fence, in pro-
portion to the cost of the whole; and in case the parties shall agree to divide any
partition-fence between them, such agreement, setting forth the kind of fence, and
462 FERRIES.
what portion of the same each party shall make and keep in repair, shall be filed in
the office of the board of surveyors and regulators, to be there kept as a public record.
Act 22 Marcu 1865. Purd. 906.
Sect. 1. If the party who shall be delinquent in making or repairing any fence, in
accordance with the provisions of the act of which this is a supplement, shall not,
within ten days after the report shall have been approved by the board of surveyors,
proceed to repair or build said fence, and complete the same in a reasonable time, it
shall be lawful for the parties aggrieved to repair or build said fence ; and if the costs
for the work done and materials furnished are not paid by the delinquent party,
within three months after the completion of the same, a lien may be filed against the
premises for said costs and expenses, which shall be of the same effect, and may be
sued out and collected in the same manner as municipal claims are now by law collected.
Act 6 May 1870. Purd. 906.
Sect. 1. The duties required to be performed by the board of surveyors and regu-
lators of the city of Philadelphia, as fence-viewers, as provided by the act of March
11, 1862, shall be performed by the building inspectors of said city, who shall have
authority to fix the prices to be paid for the erection or repairs of said fences, or (as)
may come under their official inspection, and they shall receive a fee of three dollars
in each case, to be paid by the applicant for the view.
Act 23 Marcu 1865. Purd. 906.
Secr. 1. If any person or persons, from and after the passage of this act, shall,
maliciously or wantonly, break or throw down any post and rail or other fence, erected
for the enclosure of land, or shall carry away, break or destroy any post, rail or other
material, of which such fence was built, enclosing any lots or fields within the
commonwealth, such person or persons so offending shall be guilty of a misdemeanor,
and on conviction, shall be sentenced to pay a fine, not exceeding fifty dollars, one-half
thereof to be paid to the informer, on conviction of the offender or offenders, the
other half to the support of the poor of such county, township, borough or ward
where the offence has been committed, with costs of prosecution, or to undergo an im-
prisonment, not exceeding six months, or both or either, at the discretion of the
court.
The fence law of 1700 was repealed by the act 4th April 1889, P. L. 27. Since the
passage of that act a land owner is not required to fence cattle out; their owner must
fence them in.’ Since the passage of that act, the owner of cattle who is sued for
damages for the trespass of his cattle, must show, to prevent recovery, that he kept
his cattle in or tried to, by a sufficient fence.?
A man cannot settle his property to his own use, until a
creditor assail it, and then over, so as to prevent his creditor from seizing it.‘
The fraudulent intent as to existing creditors, is a conclusion of law, where the
deed is a voluntary one; but where it is otherwise, the fraudulent intent is to be
established as a fact, by the party impugning the conveyance.°
A conveyance of real estate by a father to his son, intended to delay and hinder
creditors, is fraudulent as to them, whether the consideration amount to the value
of the land or not.6 The consideration of a sale may amount to the value of the
land sold, and yet the sale be fraudulent as against creditors, because such sale may
delay, hinder and obstruct them in the collection of their debts,
A deed made to hinder and delay creditors, though void as to them, nevertheless
concludes the debtor for all other purposes.* The deed is good, except against the
interest intended to be defrauded.® ’
Whether a party who seeks to set aside a conveyance, under the statute, be a
purchaser for a valuable consideration, is a question of fact for the jury.’
The conveyance, however, though fraudulent, changes the title; and after-ac-
quired judgments against the grantof are not liens upon the same title as prior
ones; such prior liens are not, therefore, affected by a sale under the subsequent
judgments,”
1 1 Rob. Dig. 298. 7 16 Penn, St. 497.
2 Pet. C. C. 460, 464. 128. & R. 448. Seo 8 29 Ibid. 219.
1 Am. Lead. Cas. 41-79. 9 27 Ibid. 148.
3 39 Penn. St. 499. 10 3 W.151. 87 Penn. St. 40.
4 46 Ibid, 411. 1 31 Penn. St. 241. 33 Ibid. 294. 44 Ibid. 95.
6 26 Ibid. 123. 67 Ibid. 434.
6 16 Ibid. 488.
[ 501 J
Freeholders.
FREEHOLDERS are entitled to certain privileges in this state: 1. By the act of
1725, to an exemption from arrest on mesue process, in any civil action 2. By
the acts of 1810 and 1836, to a stay of execution, on judgments obtained against
them.
For purposes of exemption from arrest, the act of 1725 defines a freeholder to be
an inhabitant in any part of this province who hath resided therein for the space
of two years, and has fifty acres of land or more, in fee-simple, well seated, and
twelve acres thereof or more, well cleared or improved, or hath a dwelling-house
worth fifty pounds current money of America, in some city or township within this
province, clear estate, or hath unimproved land to the value of fifty pounds like
money. But in order to be entitled to a stay of execution, the defendant must have
a freehold within the county where the judgment is entered.$
Any incumbrance on a freehold estate is sufficient to deprive a defendant of a
stay of execution. It is not enough, that the estate may be considered equal to the
judgment after paying all incumbrances.* °
A judgment obtained before a justice of the peace is sufficient ground to defeat
the privilege of a freeholder.2 Sv is an award from which appeal has been
taken; the court will not receive testimony as to the value of the land.§
If a defendant freeholder, who seeks to avail himself of the privilege arising
from his freehold, neglect to suggest it, it would justify the issuing of an
execution against him; but, on the payment of costs accrued on the execution, the
magistrate should supersede it, and give the defendant the privilege secured by
law.’
Where a plea of freehold for a stay of execution is entered by a defendant, the
plaintiff may issue execution, but at his peril. If the plaintiff issue execution,
notwithstanding the plea, on defendant’s motion to set it aside, if the freehold be
found sufficient, the motion will be granted, and the plaintiff will be compelled to
pay the costs of the execution: if the freehold be found insufficient, the execution
will be good. Qn a plea of freehold being entered, the plaintiff may move to dis-
miss it for insufficiency.?
If the freehold be within the county, the defendant need only show its existence
and value; it then lies on the plaintiff, if he object, to show an incumbrance; but
if it lie in another county, the defendant must, in addition, produce evidence of its
being clear from incumbrances.”
If there be two persons concerned in the same transaction upon which a suit is
brought, and one of them be privileged from arrest, he being a freeholder and the
other not, the party freeholder is liable to be jointly arrested with the other; for a
party privileged from arrest loses that advantage by his partnership with one who is
not entitled to such privilege.”
Under the act of 1725, if the defendant’s freehold be clear of incumbrances, it
is enough that it be of the value of fifty pounds, though less than the plaintiff's
demand; if incumbered, the question is, whether it would be sufficient to satisfy
the plaintiff’s demand, over and above the incumbrances.”? ;
A capias against a freeholder will be quashed, if the application be made within
a reasonable time, though after the quarto die post.* And a freeholder does not
waive his privilege from arrest, by moving to reduce the bail.“
1 Purd 66, This statute was revived by the and put the defendant to his motion to quash.
act of 1838. 1 Clark 18. 1 W. N. 0. 47. But it has been ruled, in one
2 Purd. 829. of the courts, that execution cannot issue, until
3 5 Binn. 432. Purd. 739. the defendant has been called upon to justify
4 5 Binn. 253. his plea of freehold. 2 W.N. C. 488.
5 1 Dall. 436. 101 T. & H. Pr. 3 235. 1 Kulp 352.
6 3 Am. L. J. 522. ll 2 Bro. 135. 13 W.N.C.193. 65 Penn St.
7 1 Ash. 407. 86. 1 Tidd’s Pr. 84.
8 2M. 347 12158. & R. 363-5.
91 Phila. 204. 2 M. 347. 17. & H. Pr. 1 10 W. N.C. 553.
@ 1036. It is said, that the proper way to test 14 2 Ibid. 186.
the sufficiency of the pleas, is to issue execution,
[ 502 J
Fugitives from Justice.
I. Constitution of the United States, III. Act of assembly.
II. Act of congress. IV. Judicial decisions.
I. A PERSON charged in any state, with treason, felony or other crime, who shall
flee from justice, and be found in another state, shall, on demand of the executive
authority of the state from which he fled, be delivered up, to be removed to the
state having jurisdiction of the crime.’
II. Act or Conaress. U.S. Rev. Stat. 1022.
Sror. 5278. Whenever the executive authority of any state or territory
demands any person as a fugitive from justice, of the executive authority of any
state or territory to which such person has fled; and produces a copy of an indict-
ment found, or an affidavit made before a magistrate of any state or territory,
charging the person so demanded, with having committed treason, felony or other
crime, certified as authentic by the governor or chief magistrate of the state or
territory from whence the person so charged has fled, it shall be the duty of the
executive authority of the state or territory to which such person has fled, to cause
him or her to be arrested and secured, and to cause notice of the arrest to be given
to the executive authority making such demand, or to the agent of such authority
appointed to receive the fugitive; and to cause the fugitive to be delivered to such
agent, when he shall appear: if no such agent appears within six months from the
time of the arrest, the prisoner may be discharged. And all costs and expenses
incurred in the apprebending, securing and transmitting such fugitive to the state
or territory making such demand, shall be paid by such state or territory.
Sect. 5279. Any agent so appointed, who receives the fugitive into his custody,
shall be empowered to transport him to the state or territory from which he has
fled. And every person who by force sets at liberty or rescues the fugitive from
such agent, while so transporting him, shall be fined not more than five hundred
dollars, or imprisoned not more than one year.’
TI. Acr 24 May 1878. Purd. 943.
Szor. 1. It shall be the duty of the governor of this commonwealth, in all cases
where, by virtue of a requisition made upon him by the governor of another state
or territory, any citizen, inhabitant or temporary resident of this commonwealth,
is to be arrested as a fugitive from justice (provided that the said requisition be
accompanied with a certified copy of the indictment or information, from the
authorities of such other state or territory, charging such person with any crime
in such state or territory), to issue and transmit a warrant for such purpose to the
sheriff of the proper county, or other officer authorized by law to execute warrants,
in which the requisition describes the party or parties to be residing or domiciled ;
and the sheriff or the deputy-sheriff, or other officer, as aforesaid, of the county,
shall alone be competent to make service of the same.
Sor. 2. Before the sheriff or his deputy, or other officer as aforesaid, shall deliver
the person arrested into the custody of the officer or officers named in the requisi-
tion it shall be the duty of the sheriff or other officer as aforesaid to take the
prisoner or prisoners before a judge of a court of record, who shall, in open court,
if in session, otherwise at chambers, inform the prisoner or prisoners of the caase
of his or their arrest, the nature of the process, and instruct him or them that if
he or they claim not to be the particular person or persons mentioned in said
requisition, indictment or affidavit before a magistrate of said other state or terri-
tory, charging said person with some crime and warrant of arrest, he or they may
have a writ of Aabeas corpus, upon filing an affidavit to that effect, except the
gaid person or persons so arrested or taken shall have previously consented to and
1 Const. U. 8. art. IV. 2 2. 2 See 35409,
FUGITIVES FROM JUSTICE. 503
waived in writing the right to go before said judge for the purpose of availing
himself of the writ of habeas corpus: Provided, however, The investigation
and hearing under said writ shall be limited to the question of identification, and
shall not enter into the merits of facts of the charge, indictment or information
accompanying or referred to in the, requisition; and if, after due hearing, the pris-
oner or prisoners shall be found to be the parties indicted or informed against and
mentioned in the requisition or warrant, then the court shall order and direct the
sheriff or other officer as aforesaid to deliver the prisoner or prisoners into the custody
of the officer designated in the requisition, as the agent upon the part of such state
to receive him or them, otherwise to be discharged from custody by the court.?
Sxcr. 3. It shall not be lawful for any person or officer to take any person or
persons out of this commonwealth, upon the ground that the prisoner or prisoners
consent to go, or by reason of his or their willingness to waive the proceedings afore-
described ; and any person or persons who shall arrest or procure the arrest of any
citizen, inhabitant or temporary resident of this commonwealth, for the purpose
of taking or sending him to another state, without a requisition first had and
obtained, accompanied by a certified copy of the indictment or information, and
without a warrant issued by or under the direction of the governor of this common-
wealth, served by the sheriff or his deputy, and without first taking him before
a judge of a court of record, as aforesaid, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and
upon conviction, be sentenced to one year imprisonment.
Sect. 4, Any violation of this act, on the part of the sheriff or his deputy, or
other officer, as aforesaid, shall be deemed a misdemeanor in office.
Srct. 5. Nothing in this act shall be construed to prevent the sheriff of any
county, or chief of police of any city, or other person, to cause the arrest of any per-
son or persons, upon information of the offence or crime committed in another state,
and that a warrant has there been issued for the arrest of the said party or parties,
or has there been indicted: Provided, The officers of any town, city or county, or
authorities of such other state or territory, shall procure a requisition and have
the same presented to the governor of this commonwealth, within ninety days
after the arrest shall have been made; and the prisoner or prisoners, upon being
arrested or detained, shall be brought before a court or judge, in the manner and for
the purpose provided in the second section of this act: Provided, such person shall
not be committed or held to bail for a longer period than ninety days exclusive of
the day of arrest, at the expiration of which time, if the sheriff has not received the
requisition or warrant from the governor of’ this commonwealth, then the person or
persons so arrested and detained shall be discharged from custody.
Sror. 6. Any person giving false information under this act, with intent to injure
any person, or deprive him of his liberty, shall be liable to the penalties of the third
section of this act.
IV. The right to arrest criminals who had fled from one state to another, was
recognised under the colonial governments before the adoption of the constitution
of the United States. It was based upon that great principle of the common law,
that when a crime has been committed, any one has authority to arrest the
offender, with or without a warrant. Since the adoption of the federal constitu-
tion, and the passage of the act of congress in 1793, it has always been the practice,
in every state, to arrest a criminal who has fled from justice, and taken refuge in
another state, and detain him till a formal requisition can be made by the proper
authority for his surrender and removal; and this, upon the principle of comity
between the several states; each acting under the great principle of the common
law just stated.
This right to arrest under such circumstances, has been fully recognised by the
supreme court. The late chief justice, in delivering the opinion of the court,
remarks: “I grant, that when the executive has been in the habit of delivering
up fugitives, or is obliged by treaty, the magistrates may issue warrants of arrest
on their own accord (on proper evidence), in order more effectually to accomplish
1This act is unconstitutional, so far as it 2So amended, by act 4 June 1879. Pamph.
limits the rights of the accused to the mere 95. :
question of identification. 7 Luz. L. Reg. 209. $1 Am. L, J. 430. 1 Phila. 80. 2 Pitts.
30. 0.65. 7 Ibid. 51. : 166.
504 FUGITIVES FROM JUSTICE.
the intent of the government, by preventing the escape of the criminals, On this
principle, we arrest offenders who have fled from one of the United States to
another, even before a demand has been made by the executive of the state from
which they fled.’
It makes no difference, whether or not the offence charged be a felony by the
laws of the state from which the party is alleged to be a fugitive.” In Pennsyl-
vania, the ordinary practice with the executive is, to issue his warrant of surrender,
whenever a requisition is supported by an indictment, duly accompanied by execu-
tive averment, that the particular offence is a crime in the state where it was
committed, and by an affidavit that the defendant has fled from such state into the
one where the warrant is demanded.’
An affidavit to arrest an alleged fugitive from justice, must state positively that
the alleged crime was committed in the state from which the party is alleged to be
a fugitive, and that the party is actually a fugitive from that state.* The affidavit,
when that form of evidence is adopted, must be at least so explicit and certain, that
if it were laid before a magistate, it would justify him in committing the accused
to answer the charge.>
The warrant of removal must show that a demand has been made by the execu-
tive of the state from whence the fugitive fled ; and also that information has been
given, either by the copy of a bill of indictment, or by affidavit, charging the fugi-
tive with having committed a crime ; which should be stated as it is represented
in the indictment or affidavit furnished. If the validity of the warrant be examined
on habeas corpus, it ought to appear affirmatively that the governor had jurisdiction
of the case, otherwise the warrant is utterly void.* Where the warrant is duly
issued, the courts canuot go behind it; the only question they can entertain is as
to the identity of the alleged fugitive.’
Where a defendant is brought into a state as a fugitive from justice, after
acquittal, or conviction and pardon, he cannot be surrendered to the authorities of
another state as a fugitive, but must be allowed an opportunity to return to the
state in which he is domiciled.*
Where the governor of one state demands a person of the governor of another
state, as a fugitive from justice, and the governor of the latter state causes the
accused to be arrested and delivered to the person appointed for that purpose by
the governor making the demand, such person is not liable for a false imprisonment,
by reason of any irregularity in the warrant of arrest.2 The governor’s warrant is a
conclusive justification.° The governor issuing the requisition is the only proper
judge of the authenticity of the affidavit.
110 & & R.135. The same point is decided 6 Law Rep. 57.
in 18 Penn. St. 39. 9 Wend. 221. 3 Zabr.311. 5 6 Penn. L. J. 414, 418.
4 Harring. 572. BR. M. Charlit. 120. 6 Penn. L. 6 1 Am. L. J. 430.
J. 428. 17 Leg. Int. 244. Vaux 30. 7 6 Penn. L. J. 417. See 7 Luz. L. Reg. 209.
2 1 Sandf. 701. 8 Daniel’s Case, Q. S. Phila., 22 April 1848,
3 6 Penn. L. J. 424. 13 Ga, 97. 21 Law Rep. before Parsons, J.
488 9 2 Blackf. 311,
4 Sand. 701. 3 McLean 121. 3 Zabr. 311. 19 20 Law Rep. 651.
2 Carter 396. 5 Cal. 237. 6 Penn. L. J.417-18. 1 5 Cal. 237, 21 Law Rep. 488. 16 Leg. Int. 2t
[ 505 ]
Gambling.
I. Of gambling-houses. IV. Of money lost at play.
II. Of cock-fighting, gaming, de. V. Of billiard rooms and bowling saloons.
III. Of gaming, &c., at taverns. VI. Judicial decisions.
'
I. OF GAMBLING-HOUSES.
IF any person shall set up or establish, or cause to be set up or established, in any
house, room, out-house, tent, booth, arbor or other place whatsoever, any game or
device of address or hazard, with cards, dice, billiard balls, shuffle-boards, or any
other instrument, article or thing whatsoever, heretofore or which hereafter may be
invented, used and employed, at which money or other valuable thing may or shall
be played for or staked or betted upon; or if any person shall procure, permit, suffer
and allow persons to collect and assemble in his house, room, out-house, booth, tent,
arbor or other place whatsoever, under his control, for the purpose of playing at,
and staking or betting upon such game or device of address or hazard, money or
other valuable thing; or if any person being the owner, tenant, lessee or occupant
of any house, room, out-house, tent, booth, arbor or other place whatsoever, shall
lease, hire or rent the same, or any part thereof, to be used and occupied, or em-
ployed, for the purpose of playing at, or staking and betting upon, such game or
device of address or hazard, for money or other valuable thing; the person so
offending in either of the enumerated cases, shall be guilty of’ a misdemeanor, and,
on conviction, be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars, and
undergo an imprisonment not exceeding one year. The owner of such house, room,
out-house, tent, booth, arbor or other place whatsoever, who shall have knowledge
that any such game or device of address or hazard, as aforesaid, has been set up
in or upon the said premises, and shall not forthwith cause complaint to be made
against the person who has set up or established the same, shall be deemed and
held to have knowingly leased, hired or rented the said premises for the said un-
lawful purposes: Provided, That this act shall not be construed to apply to games
of recreation and exercise, such as billiards, bagatelle, ten-pins, et cetera, where no
betting is allowed.
If any person shall keep or exhibit any gaming-table, establishment, device or
apparatus, to win or gain money or other property of value, or aid, assist or permit
others to do the same; or if any person shall engage in gambling for a livelihood, or
shall be without any fixed residence, and in the habit or practice of gambling; he shall
be deemed and taken to be a common gambler, and upon conviction thereof, shall be
sentenced to an imprisonment, by separate or solitary confinement at labor, not
exceeding five years, and to pay a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars.”
If any person shall, through solicitation, invitation or device, persuade or prevail
on any other person to visit any room, building, arbor, booth, shed or tenement, or
other place kept for the use of gambling, such person shall be guilty of a misde-
meanor, and, upon conviction thereof, be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding five
hundred dollars; and besides, shall be civilly responsible and liable to pay back to
any person induced by him to enter such gambling-house, any sum he may have
lost at play therein.’
No witness shall be excused, under any allegation or pretence whatsoever, in any
prosecution or proceeding for unlawful gambling, from giving his testimony touching
the same ; but no evidence given, or facts divulged by him, shall be used or employed
against him in any criminal prosecution whatever.‘
If any affidavit be made and filed before any magistrate, before whom complaint
has been made of the commission of either of the crimes provided against in the
three preceding sections, setting forth that the affiant has reason to believe, and
does believe, that the person charged in such complaint has upon his person, or at
any other place named in said affidavit, any gaming-table, device or apparatus,
the discovery of which might lead to establish the truth of such charge, the said
1 Act 31 March 1860 3 55. Purd. 509. 3 Ibid. 3 57.
2 Ibid. 2 56. 4 Ibid. 2 58.
506 GAMBLING.
magistrate shall, by his warrant, command the officer who is authorized to arrest the
person so charged, to make diligent search for such table, device or apparatus, and
if found, to bring the same before such magistrate ; and the officer so seizing, shall
deliver the same to the magistrate before whom he takes the prisoner, who shall re-
tain possession, and be responsible therefor until the discharge, commitment or letting
to bail of the person so charged ; after which such officer shall retain such table, .
device or apparatus, subject to the order of the court before which such offender
may be required to appear, until his discharge or conviction; and in case of the
conviction of such person, the gaming-table, device or apparatus shall, by the direc-
tion of the court, be destroyed.’ SiN,
It shall and may be lawful for any sheriff, constable or other officer of justice,
with or without warrant, to seize upon, secure and remove any device or machinery
of any kind, character or description whatsoever, used and employed for the pur-
poses of unlawful gaming as aforesaid, and to arrest, with or without warrant, any
person setting up the same.’ And it shall be the duty of such sheriff, constable or
other officer, to make return, in writing, to the next court of quarter sessions of the
proper county, setting forth the nature and description of the device or machine so
seized upon, and the time, place and circumstances under which such seizure was
made ; and the said court, upon hearing the parties, if they should appear, if satis-
fied that such device or machine was employed and used for the purpose of unlaw-
ful gaming as aforesaid, shall adjudge the same forfeited, and order it tu be publicly
destroyed, and at the same time order such reasonable costs and charges to the seiz-
ing officer as they shall deem adequate and just, to be paid by the owner or possessor
of such device or machine, or in case of his default, or in case he cannot be found,
to be paid as costs are now by law paid upon indictments ; and such adjudication
shall be conclusive evidence to establish the legality of such seizure, in any court
of this commonwealth, in any cause in which the question of its legality shall arise ;
and in any case in which a decree of forfeiture shall not be pronounced, if said
court shall, upon the evidence, be satisfied that there was probable cause for the
seizure, they shall certify the same, which certificate shall be a bar to any action
brought against the officer for or on account of such seizure, in those cases in which
the said officer returns, or offers to return such device or machine; and in all cases
shall prevent a recovery in damages, for any sum beyond the real value of the
device or machine seized.?
No writ of replevin shall issue for any device or machine, seized as aforesaid, nor
shall any action be instituted for or on account of such seizure, until the court shall
have first adjudicated upon the premises; but such writ or action shall forth-
with, on motion, be quashed and abated by the court in which it shall be sued
or brought.’
IL. OF cocK-FIGHTING, GAMING, &¢.
If any person or persons * * * shall cause to fight any cock or cocks, for
money or any other valuable thing, or shall promote or encourage any match or
matches of cock-fighting, by betting thereon, every such person so offending,
shall, upon conviction thereof before any * * * court of quarter sessions of the
proper * * county, forfeit and pay the sum of forty dollars for every such offence,
one-half thereof to the use of the informer, and the other half to the use of the
poor of the proper city or county in which poor-houses have been or may be erected,
and when no poor-house shall be erected, to the use of the poor of the city, bor-
ough or township in which the offence shall be committed; and in default of
payment of the fine aforesaid, the offender shall be committed to prison for any
period not exceeding thirty days, at the discretion of the court before which the
conviction shall take place : Provided further, That such information shall be made
within forty-eight hours after the commission of the offence.‘
If any person or persons * * * shall play at any match of bullets in any
place, for money or other valuable thing, or on any public highway, with or
without a bet, or shall play at cards, dice * * shuffle-boards or any game of
1 Act 31 March 1860 3 59. Purd. 510. See6 8 Ibid. 3 61.
Law Rep. 510. 9 Ibid, 205. 4 Act 12 March 1830 31. Purd. 950.
2 Ibid. 2 60.
GAMBLING. . 507
hazard or address, for money or other valuable thing, every such person, so offend-
ing, shall, upon conviction thereof before any justice or magistrate, as aforesaid,
forfeit and pay three dollars for every such offence; and if any person or persons
shall enter, start or run any horse, mare or gelding, for any plate, prize, wager, bet,
sum of money or other valuable thing, every such person, so offending, shall, upon
conviction thereof as aforesaid, forfeit and pay the sum of twenty dollars!
One moiety of the forfeitures in money, accruing and becoming due for any
offence against this act, shall be paid to the overseers of the poor of the city, borough
or township wherein the offence shall be committed, for the use of the poor thereof,
and the other moiety to the person or persons who shall prosecute and sue for the
same; and the inhabitants of such city or other place, shall, notwithstanding, be
admitted witnesses to testify against any person who shall be prosecuted for any
offence by virtue of this act: Provided, That no person shall be prosecuted or con-
victed for any offence against this act, unless such prosecution be commenced within
thirty days after the offence has been committed.?
III. Or camina, &c., AT TAVERNS.
If any innkeeper, tavern-keeper, or other retailer of wine, spirituous or other
strong drink, shall incite, promote or encourage any games of address, hazard, cock-
fighting, bullet-playing or horse-racing, at which any money or other valuable thing
shall be betted, staked, striven for, won or lost, or shall furnish any wine, spirituous
liquors, beer, cider or other strong drink, to any of the persons assembled or attend-
ing upon any such game, fight, play or race, such person shall forfeit and pay, upon
conviction of the first offence, fourteen dollars, and upon a second conviction of the
offence, twenty-eight dollars.’
And if any such person shall permit and allow any kind of game of address or
hazard, or any playing, betting or gaming for money or other thing of value what-
soever, either at cards, dice, billiards, bowls, shuffle-boards or any game or device
in any other manner to be practised, played or carried on within his or her dwelling-
house, out-house, shed or other place in his or her occupancy, such person shall, for
the first and second offence, respectively, forfeit and pay the like sum.*
And if any innkeeper or tavern-keeper, or other licensed retailer of wine or other
liquors, shall offend as aforesaid, the licence of such person shall, upon his convic-
tion thereof, become void, and such offender shall be incapable of being again
licensed in like manner for one year thereafter; and upon such second conviction,
such person shall, in addition to the penalty aforesaid, be for ever incapable of being
a public-house keeper or retailer as aforesaid, within this commonwealth®
Provided, That where any such licensed public-house keeper or retailer, as afore-
said, who shall be convicted as aforesaid, before any one justice or other magistrate,
shall think himself or herself aggrieved by such conviction, it shall and may be
lawful for such licensed public-house keeper or retailer to appeal to the next court
of quarter sessions of the peace, to be held for the city or county wherein the offence
was committed (and not after), which said court shall thereupon proceed as soon as
may be, to hear and determine the said appeal, and to affirm or reverse the proceed-
ings had before the said justice or other magistrate ; and the determination of the
said court shall be final and conclusive.®
LV. OF MONEY LOST AT PLAY.
!
If any person or persons shall lose any money or other valuable thing, at or upon
any match of cock-fighting, bullet-playing or horse-racing, or at or upon any game
of address, game of hazard, play or game whatsoever, the person or persons who
shall lose their money or other valuable thing, shall not be compelled to pay or
make good the same; and every contract, note, bill, bond, judgment, mortgage
or other security or conveyance whatsoever, given, granted, drawn or entered into,
1 Act 22 April 179435. Purd. 950. Forthe 5 Ibid. 2 20.
proceedings to convict under this act, see tit. 6 Act 22 April 1794 36. Purd. 951. The re-
“Profaneness.” And see tit. “ Horse Racing.” mainder of this section is supplied by the act of
2 Act 22 April 1794312. Purd. 950. 1834, by which, however, this section is not re-
8 Act 11 March 1834 318. Purd, 950. enacted. Qwere, whether it is in force?
4 Ibid. 219.
508 GAMBLING.
for the security or satisfaction of the same, or any part thereof, shall be utterly void
and of none effect.
If any person or persons shall lose any money or other thing of value, at or upon
any game of address, or of hazard or other play, and shall pay or deliver the same
or any part thereof, the person or persons so losing and paying or delivering the
same, shall have a right, within ten days then next or thereafter, to sue for and
recover the money or goods so lost and paid, or delivered, or any part thereof, from
the respective winner or winners thereof, with costs of suit, by action of debt or
case, for the value of the money or thing so lost, founded on this act, to be prose-
cuted in any court of record, or where the value is under a sum that may be
recovered, before any justice of the peace, within this commonwealth, subject to an
appeal as in other cases, in which action no essoin, protection or wager of law, nor
more than one imparlance shall be admitted; and in which actions it shall be
sufficient for the plaintiff or plaintiffs to allege that the defendant or defendants is
or are indebted to him, her or them, or hath or have received to his, her or their
use the money so lost and paid, or converted the goods won of him, her or them, to
the use of the defendant or defendants, whereby the action of the plaintiff or
plaintiffs accrued to him, her or them, according to the form of this act, without
setting forth the special matter.?
V. OF BILLIARD ROOMS AND BOWLING SALOONS.
No person shall keep any billiard room, bowling saloon or ten-pin alley in this
commonwealth, without first taking from the treasurer of the proper county a
licence ; * * * and no such licence shall be granted for a longer period than one
year. Any person keeping such billiard room, bowling saloon or ten-pin alley, with-
out licence, shall, on conviction thereof in the court of quarter sessions of the
proper county, be punished by fine not less than the amount of such licence,
nor more than five hundred dollars, or imprisonment in the county jail for any
period not exceeding three months, and costs of prosecution: Provided, That this
section shall not be construed to prohibit billiard tables or ten-pin alleys con-
nected with hospitals, asylums or other institutions for the relief of the insane and
diseased.
No licence shall hereafter be granted to any person who may keep a billiard
room, bowling saloon or nine or ten-pin alley, under the 19th section of the said
act to which this is a supplement, unless such person shall pay [in the city and
incorporated districts of the county of Philadelphia and city of Pittsburgh, for
such licence, at the rate of one hundred dollars for the first billiard table, bowling
alley, or nine or ten-pin alley, and ten dollars for each and every additional billiard
table, bowling alley, or nine or ten-pin alley, in any one establishment used for any
such purposes ;] and in the other counties of this commonwealth and the unincor-
porated townships of the county of Philadelphia, the sum of thirty dollars for the
first table and alley as aforesaid, and ten dollars for each additional table or alley;
and no such licence shall be granted for a longer period than one year: any person
keeping such billiard room, bowling saloon or nine or ten-pin alley, without licence,
shall be liable to the same penalties and liabilities provided by the said 19th section
of the act to which this is a supplement, for persons offending against the same ;
but this section shall not be construed to prohibit billiard tables, or bowling or nine
or ten-pin alleys connected with hospitals or asylums, or other institutions for the
relief of the insane or diseased, or to private individuals who have such ten-pin
alleys on their own premises, and not used for pay or public use.‘
No licence shall be hereafter granted to any person who may keep a billiard room,
bowling saloon, or nine or ten-pin alley, unless such person shall pay, in the city
and incorporated districts of the county of Philadelphia, city of Lancaster and
city of Pittsburgh, for such licence, at the rate of thirty dollars for the first
table, bowling alley or nine or ten-pin alley, and ten dollars for each and every
additional billiard table, bowling alley, or nine or ten-pin alley, in any one establish-
1 Act 22 April 1794 9 8. Purd, 951. 3 Act 10 April 1849 2 19. Purd. 951.
1 Ibid. 29. Seo 17 W. N. C. 557. « Act 15 May 185032. Ibid. 952.
GAMBLING. 509
ment used for any such purpose ;, said licence to be collected in the city and county
of Philadelphia in the same manner as now provided by law in the case of tavern
licences.”
The moiety of the fines and forfeitures in money, accruing under the 19th sec-
tion of the act to which this is a supplement, and under the 2d section of this act,
shall herdafter be appropriated to and for the use of the person or persons who,shall
prosecute in such cases, and the other moiety of the same shall be for the benefit
of the commonwealth ; and nothing in the said act to which this is a supplement,
or in the present act, shall be construed in any court or judicial tribunal to repeal
any law in force at the time of passing the said act to whieh this is a supplement,
imposing any penalty or penalties upon gambling or unlawful gaming?
No person shall keep a bagatelle room in the county of Allegheny, without first
taking from the treasurer of the said county a licence, for which he or she shall
pay as follows: for every such licence granted by the treasurer of the county, the
sum of five dollars for each bagatelle table, together with the sum of fifty cents to
the treasurer as a fee for his certificate of licence, and the further sum of thirty-
seven and a half’ cents as a fee to the mercantile appraiser for his return, as herein-
after provided, and no such licence shall be granted for a longer period than one
year, and any person keeping such bagatelle rooms or tables, for purposes of play,
without a licence, shall, on conviction thereof in the court of quarter sessions of
the proper county, be punished by a fine not less than ten dollars nor more than
one hundred dollars: Provided, That this section shall not be construed to prohibit
the use of such tables in hospitals, asylums or other institutions, for the insane and
diseased?
The mercantile appraiser shall make return to the county treasurer of all per-
sons keeping such tables at the time of making his annual returns, as provided for
by law, except the present year, which return of the keepers of such tables shall
be made on the first Monday of June.‘ ,
No person licensed to keep a restaurant or eating-house, or to sell spirituous or
malt liquors, shall establish upon his premises a billiard room, bowling saloon
or ten-pin alley, shuffle-board or other like game, directly communicating with, or
the passage to which shall lead through the public bar-room, eating-rooni, or other
place of public resort on the premises, under the penalty of ten dollars for every
day such communication shall be allowed, to be recovered as debts under one hun-
dred dollars are recoverable, one-half to go to the informer.
If the proprietor, keeper, lessee or manager of any saloon, hotel, tavern,
inn, billiard room or other place of resort or entertainment, shall keep, maintain
or permit to be played upon his premises, or in connection therewith, or having
passage or communication to or with the same, the game or amusement of pool
with balls, or any other game of chance, the result or price of forfeiture of pay-
ment, in any form, of such game or amusement, shall be by drinks of vinous,
spirituous, malt or brewed liquors, or any admixtures thereof, he or she shall be
guilty of a misdemeanor, and, upon conviction thereof, shall be sentenced, for
the first offence, to pay a fine of one hundred dollars, and to undergo an
imprisonment of not less than ninety days, and for the second offence, to pay a
‘fine of five hundred dollars, and to undergo an imprisonment of not less than one
year; and any licence granted for the keeping of such saloon, hotel, tavern, inn,
billiard room, or other place of resort or amusement, shall, upon second conviction,
be declared null and void, by the court in which the said second offence shall be
tried.
VI. Gaming, says Hawkins, is permitted in England, upon every possible subject,
excepting where it is accompanied by circumstances repugnant to morality, or pub-
lic policy, or where, in certain special cases, it is restrained by positive statute.*
But where the playing is, from the magnitude of the stake, excessive, and such as
1 Act 14 April 1851 39. Purd. 952. 5 Act 13 April 1859 3 2. Ibid.
2 Act 15 May 185034. Ibid. § Act 1 June 1881 31. Ibid.
8 Act 11 May 1853 39. Ibid. 710r. C0. C. 511.
4 Ibid. 2 10. Ibid. 953.
510 GAMBLING.
is now commonly understood by the term ‘“ gaming,” it is considered by the law
as an offence, being in its consequences most mischievous to society.*
From the nature of the evils requiring a remedy, and from the words of the act
of 1847 (re-enacted by the revised Penal Code of the 31st March 1860), its pro-
visions embrace only those games which are attended with “ winning, betting or
gaining money or other property.” It does not extend to games which are useful
in disciplining the mind, or in exercising the body, and in which nothing ts either
lost by one party or gained by the other. Such games when conducted with pro-
priety—when not kept in connection with public houses—when not used to encourage
the dissolute to spend their time and money in idleness and tippling (thus becoming
a nuisance in fact), are neither forbidden by the common law, nor by the statute.
There is one species of amusement which, as it approaches the line which divides
wanocence from guilt, it may be proper to consider. Billiards and bowling (the
latter more commonly called ten-pins) are frequently used for the purpose of amuse-
ment and recreation, and it is customary for the losing party to pay to the proprietor
a reasonable compensation for the use of the table, alley or saloon. In such a case
it was held, ‘that paying for the table by the rub is not gaming within the meaning
of the law—that illegal gaming implies gain and loss between the parties by betting ;
such as would excite a spirit of cupidity.”* This decision is fully in accordance
with sound principles of interpretation (under which a penal statute is never extended
“by construction to cases not clearly within its purview), and we adopt it as a true
exposition of the law.* This view of the law appears to have been adopted by the
legislature, who by the act of JOth April 1849, have provided for the licensing of
billiard rooms, and bowling saloons or ten-pin alleys.
A public gaming-house is a public nuisance, at common law ;* and it is so
declared by the act 2d April 1870.°
One who furnishes cards or other implements of gaming may be convicted under
the 55th section of the act of 1860.6 It seems, that game-cocks are not such
articles as may be seized under the 59th section.’ Dominoes have been held to be
a game of chance as well as of skill.8 Where a person is openly and notoriously
engaged in maintaining a gambling table, in a public place, an officer may arrest
without warrant, after announcing his official position.®
A promissory note given for money lost at play, is void, even in the hands of an
innocent holder for value; but he may sue the indorser on his indorsement.™
The act for the licensing of billiard rooms includes pool-tables,™
1 1 Russ. on Crimes 406. 3 April 1872. Purd. 490.
2 8 Cow. 140. 8145. & Bl. 286.
8 Lewis’ Cr. L. 344. 9 106 Penn. St. 369.
410Cr. 0.0. 150. 4 Ibid. 107, 719. 10 13 Ibid. 601. 94 Ibid. 182.
5 Purd. 510. 11 13 Ibid. 603.
6 6 Phila. 381. 12212 W.N.C. 471.
17 Law Rep. 412. 11 Met. 79. But see act
[ 511 ]
Game.
[See Fisa.]
Act 3 Junge 1878. Purd. 945,
Sgor. 1. No person shall kill or pursue, in any part of this state, any elk or
wild deer, save only from the first day of October in any year, to the fifteenth day
of December next following, and no person shall have in his or her possession, or
offer for sale or transport, any elk, wild deer, antelope or fresh venison, save only
from the first day of October in any year, to the thirtieth day of November next
following. No person shall, at any time, kill any fawn when in its spotted coat, or
have the fresh skin of any such fawn in his or her possession. No person shall
pursue any elk or wild deer with dogs in any part of this state, or shall kill in the
water any elk or wild deer or fawn which has been driven thereto by dogs. Any
person offending against any of the provisions of this section, shall be deemed
guilty of a misdemeanor, and shall be liable to a penalty of fifty dollars for each
elk, wild deer or fawn so killed, pursued or trapped, or fresh elk, wild deer, ante-
lope or fawn skin had in his or her possession, and may be proceeded against in
any county of the state wherein he may be arrested, having the same in his pos-
session: And provided also, That any dogs pursuing elk or wild deer or fawn, may
be killed by any person, and (any) constable or other town official may kill any dog
that habitually pursues elk, wild deer or fawns ; and the owners of each dog shall be
liable to a penalty of ten dollars for each elk, wild deer or fawn killed by such dog.)
Szot. 2. No person shall kill or expose for sale, or have in his or her possession
after the same has been killed, any gray, black, or fox squirrel, between the first
day of January and the first day of September in each year, under the penalty of
five dollars for each and every squirrel so killed, exposed for sale or had in pos-
session.
Szor. 3. No person shall kill or expose for sale, or have in his or her possession
after the same has been killed, any hare, commonly called rabbit, between the first
day of January and the first day of November in any year, under a penalty of five
dollars for each and every hare and rabbit so killed, or exposed for sale, or had in
his possession. No person shall hunt, or cause or permit the hunting of hares or
rabbits, with a ferret or ferrets, under a penalty of ten dollars for each and every
hare and rabbit caught and killed by means of a ferret or ferrets.’
Szcr. 4. No person shall at any time kill any wild duck or goose with any device
or instrument known as a swivel or punt-gun, or with any gun other than such guns
as habitually are raised at arms’ length and fired from the shoulder, or shall use any
net, device, instrument or gun, other than such gun as aforesaid, with intent to
capture or kill any such wild duck or goose, under a penalty of ten dollars.
Szcr. 5. No person shall kill or expose for sale, or have in his or her possession
after the same has been killed, any wild turkey, between the first day of January
and the fifteenth day of October following in any year, under a penalty of ten dollars
for each bird so killed, exposed for sale or had in possession.
Secr. 6. No person shall kill, take or expose for sale, or have in his or her pos-
session, any wild fowl, between the fifteenth day of May and the first day of Sep-
tember of any year, under a penalty of ten dollars for each and every wild fowl so
killed, taken, exposed for sale or had in possession.
Sror. 7. No person shall kill or expose for sale, or have in his or her possession
after the same has been killed, any upland or grass plover, between the first day of
January and the fifteenth day of July in any year, under a penalty of ten dollars
for each bird so killed, exposed for sale or had in possession.
Szor. 8. No person shall kill or expose for sale, or have in his or her possession
after the same has been killed, any woodcock, between the first day of January and
1 So amended, by act 27 June 1883. Purd. 945, 2 So amended, oy act 10 June 1881. Purd. 945.
,
512 GAME.
the fourth day of July in any year, under a penalty of ten dollars for each bird so
killed, exposed for sale or had in possession. :
Sect. 9. No person shall kill or expose for sale, or have in his or her possession
after the same has been killed, any quail or Virginia partridge, between the fifteenth
day of December in any year and the first day of November next following, under a
penalty of ten dollars for each bird so killed, exposed for sale or had in possession.”
Sect. 10. No person shall kill or expose for sale, or have in his or her possession
after the same has been killed, any ruffed grouse, commonly called pheasant, or pin-
nated grouse, commonly called prairie chicken, between the first day of January and
the first day of October in any year, under a penalty of ten dollars for each bird so
killed, exposed for sale or had in possession; and it shall not be lawful to hunt
pheasants or pinnated grouse during the night-time, in any manner whatever, under
a penalty of ten dollars for each offence.
Sxor. 11. No person shall kill or expose for sale, or have in his or her possession
after the same has been killed, any rail bird or reed bird, except in the months of
September, October and November, under a penalty of five dollars for each and
every rail or reed bird so killed, exposed for sale or had in possession.
Sct. 12. No person shall, at any time, within this state, kill, trap or expose for
sale, or have in his or her possession after the same has been killed, any night-hawk,
whip-poor-will, [sparrow], thrush, lark, finch, martin, chimney-swallows, barn-swal-
lows, woodpecker, flicker, robin, oriole, red or cardinal bird, cedar-bird, tanager,
eat-bird, blue-bird, or any other insectivorous bird, under a penalty of five dollars
for each bird killed, trapped, exposed for sale or had in possession.
Sror. 13. The last section, to wit, section twelve, shall not apply to any person
who shall kill any bird for the purpose of scientific investigation, or having the
same stuffed or set up as a specimen.
Sror. 14. No person shall rob or destroy the eggs or nests of any wild birds
whatsoever, only (except) those of such predatory birds as are destructive of game
and insectivorous birds, under a penalty of ten dollars: Provided, That this section
shall not apply to any person who shall collect such eggs for scientific purposes.
Szcr. 15. No person shall kill or take any wild pigeon or squab, while on its
nesting or roosting ground, or break up or in any manner disturb such nesting
or roosting ground, or the birds thereon, or kill or catch with gun, net or trap, or
otherwise take or destroy any such pigeon or pigeons, within one mile of any nest-
ing or roosting ground, or discharge any fire-arms within one mile of any nesting
or roosting-ground, under a penalty of fifty dollars: Provided, That no person except
citizens of this commonwealth shall trap, or catch wild pigeons with nets, in any
of the counties of this commonwealth, unless he shall first have taken out a licence
from the county treasurer of the county in which said pigeons are found, for which
licence he shall pay the sum of fifty dollars for the use of said county, under a
penalty of one hundred dollars,’
Szcr. 16. No person shall, at any time or place within this state, kill or take any
wild turkey or ruffed grouse, commonly called pheasant, or quail or Virginia par-
tridge, or woodcock, or-rail or reed bird (or) any pinnated grouse, commonly called
prairie chicken, with any net, trap, snare or torchlight, nor use any such net, trap,
snare or torchlight for the purpose of taking or killing any of said birds, nor shall
any person sell, or expose for sale, any of the said birds after the same shall have
been so taken or killed, under a penalty of ten dollars for each bird; and it shall
be lawful for any person to take and destroy any such nests, traps or snares, when-
ever found set: Provided, That nothing in this section shall be so construed as to
prevent individuals or associations for protection, preservation or propagation of
game, from gathering alive, by nets or traps, with the written consent of the
owner of the land, quails or Virginia partridges, from the twentieth day of Decem-
ber in any year to the first day of February next following, for the sole purpose of
preserving them alive over the winter.
Sror. 17. There shall be no hunting or shooting or fishing on the first day of
the week, called Sunday; and any person offending against the provisions of this
section shall be liable to a penalty of twenty-five dollars.
Sxor. 32. Any person may sell or have in his or her possession any pinnated
grouse, commonly called prairie chicken, ruffed grouse, commonly called pheasant,
e 1So amended, by act 25 April1889. Pamph. ?So amended, by act 10 June 1881. Pamph.
é 95.
«
GAME. 513
and quail or Virginia partridge, and woodcock, for a period of fifteen (15) days
after the time limited for killing the same has expired, and shall not be liable to
any penalty under this act.
Sgor. 33. In all cases of arrests made for the violation of each or any of the
foregoing sections of this act, the possession of the game, fishes, birds, animals,
fowls, nets or other devices provided for or so mentioned, shall be prima facie evi-
dence of the violation of said act :! Provided, That nothing in this act will prevent
any person from killing any wild animal or bird, when found destroying grain, fruit
or vegetables on his or her premises.
Sxcr. 34. Any justice of the peace or alderman, upon information or complaint
made before him, by the affidavit of one or more persons, of the violation of the
provisions of this act by any person or persons, is hereby authorized and required
to issue his warrant, under his hand and seal, directed to any constable, police-
officer or warden, to cause such person or persons to be arrested and brought before
said justice or alderman, who shall hear and determine the guilt or innocence of
the person or persons so charged, and if convicted of said offence or offences, shall
be sentenced to pay the fine or fines, penalty or penalties, attached to such viola-
tions, together with costs; one-half of which penalties shall go to the informer,
and the remaining one-half shall be forthwith paid to the treasurer of the county
in which the offence was committed; and it shall be the duty of said treasurer to
distribute said fund so-arising, at the close of each year, to the various school dis-
tricts in said county, in proportion to the number of taxables in said districts:
Provided, That said conviction shall be had within one year from the time of com-
mitting the offence: And provided further, That the defendant, on refusing to pay
said penalty, shall be committed to the common jail of the county, for a period of
not less than one day for each dollar of penalty imposed ; unless the defendant
enter into recognisance, with one or more sufficient sureties, to answer said com-
plaint on a charge of a misdemeanor, before the quarter sessions of the peace of the
county in which the offence is committed, which court, on conviction of the defend-
ant of the offence charged, and failure to pay the penalty or penalties imposed by
this act, together with costs, shall commit said defendant to the common jail of the
county, for a period of not less than one day for each dollar of penalty imposed.
Sxct. 35. Any judge of the court of quarter sessions of the peace, or any alder-
man, justice of the peace, police or other magistrate, upon receiving sufficient proof,
by affidavit, that any of the provisions of this act have been violated, by any person
being temporarily within his jurisdiction, but not residing there permanently, or
by any person whose name and residence were unknown, or by any permanent
resident or citizen, is hereby authorized and required to issue his warrant for the
arrest of such person, and to cause him to be committed or held to bail to answer
the charge against him. And any such justice or magistrate, upon receiving proof
or probable cause for believing in the concealment of any game or fish mentioned in
this act, during any of the periods prohibited, shall issue his search-warrant and cause
search to be made in any house, market, boat, car, vehicle or building. All courts of
quarter sessions are hereby invested with jurisdiction to try and dispose of al] and
any of the offences against the provisions of this act, occurring in the same county.
Sucr. 36. It shall be and is hereby made the duty of the several mayors and
burgesses of the several cities, towns and boroughs within this commonwealth, to
require their respective police or constabulary force, and it is hereby made their
duty, as it is also hereby made the duty of the several clerks of market of said
cities, towns and boroughs, to diligently search out and arrest, as fora misde-
meanor, all persons violating the provisions of this act, by having any game or fish
mentioned therein unlawfully in their possession, or vending the same, during
any of the periods prohibited in this act, within such cities, towns or boroughs ;
and all persons so arrested shall be taken before the mayor, burgess or any police
or other magistrate of said cities, towns or boroughs in which the arrest is made,
who shall proceed to hear and determine as to the truth of the offence charged, on
the oath or affirmation of one or more witnesses to the same: Provided, That the
1 One who offers for sale, or has in his posses- his title and possession were acquired by purchase
sion, the fresh carcass of a deer, killed in violation at sheriff’s sale, on execution against the property
of the statute, is liable for the penalty, though of theslayer. 7 Lans. 462.
33
514 GAME.
officer making the arrest shall be a competent witness. And if the person or per.
sons so arrested shall be found guilty, he, she or they shall be convicted of a mis-
demeanor, and sentenced to pay the fine or fines, penalty or penalties, imposed by
this act for having such game or fish in possession, or vending the same during
any of the periods prohibited therein, together with the costs; one-half of said
penalty shall go to the person informing, and the other half shall be forthwith paid
to the treasurer of the county or city in which the offence was committed; and in
default of payment, as aforesaid, the offender shall be committed to the common
jail of the proper county, for the term of not less than one day for each dollar
of penalty imposed: Provided, That said conviction shall be had within one year
after committing the offence: And provided further, That the defendant may, on
refusing to pay said penalty, enter into a recognisance, with one or more sufficient
sureties, to answer said complaint, on a charge of misdemeanor, before the court
of quarter sessions of the peace of the county in which the offence is committed ;
which court, on conviction of the defendant of the offence charged, and failure to
pay the penalty or penalties imposed by this act, together with costs, shall commit
said defendant to the common jail of the county, for a period of not less than one
day for each dollar of penalty imposed: Provided, further, That nothing in this
section shall prevent any person or persons other than those particularly men-
tioned in this section, and having a knowledge of the violation of the provisions
therein mentioned, from laying information of the same and proceeding to recover
the penalty or penalties therefor, in the manner prescribed in the following sec-
tion, who shall also be a competent witness on the trial of the case.
Sror. 37. Whenever any officer or constable making complaint of the violation of
any of the provisions of this act shall fail to recover the penalty or penalties
therein mentioned, in any prosecution or suit eommenced by him or them pursuant
to the foregoing sections of this act, the costs of suit incurred by him or them shall
be a charge upon the proper county, and shall be audited and allowed as other
county charges are audited and allowed.
Scr. 38. In all cases not separately and particularly provided for in other sections
of this act, whenever the penalty or penalties mentioned in said act exceed in amount
_the jurisdiction of aldermen or justices of the peace, it shall be the duty of the
district-attorney for the county where the offence is committed to commence
actions for the recovery of such penalties, upon receiving proper information
thereof, in the court of quarter sessions of the (county) or other court having juris-
diction in the proper county ; and in all such actions brought by such district-
attorney, one-half the penalty recovered shall belong to the person laying informa-
tion on which the action is brought, and the other half shall be paid to the
treasurer of the county in which the offence is committed.
Sect. 39. All actions for violation of the provisions of this act, except where
otherwise therein directed, shall be brought within one year from the time such
violation was committed.
Act 17 May 1883. Purd. 948.
Sror. 1. It shall be lawful to hunt, shoot, kill, or destroy any web-footed wild
fowl, only from the first day of September, to the first day of May in each year!
Srot. 2. It shall be unlawful to chase, hunt, shoot, kill or destroy any web-footed
wild fowl] from or with any craft or boat propelled by steam or sails, and any per-
gon or persons using any said craft or boat for said purpose, or the captain, owner
or other person in charge of any such craft or boat, who shall allow the same to be
used while he or they are on board of the same, shall be liable to the penalties
herein imposed.
Sor. 3. Any person or persons offending against the provisions of this act shall
be liable to a fine of twenty-five dollars for each and every offence, to be sued for
and recovered before any alderman or justice of the peace.
Aor 4 June 1888. Purd. 948.
Szor. 1. It shall be lawful at any season of the year to kill or in any way de-
stroy the small bird, commonly known as the English sparrow.
1 So amended, by act 16 April 1885. Purd. 948,
GAME. 515
Act 14 May 1889. Purd. 948.
Srct. 2. No person shall take or needlessly destroy the nest or eggs of any song or
wild birds.
Szor. 3. Sections one and two of this act shall not apply to any person holding a
certificate giving the right to take birds and their nests and eggs for scientific pur-
poses, as provided for in section four of this act.
Sxcr. 4. Certificates may be granted by the prothonotary of any county in the com-
monwealth to any properly accredited person of the age of eighteen years or upward,
permitting the holder thereof to collect birds, their nests or eggs, for strictly scientific
purposes. In order to obtain such certificate the applicant for the same must present
to the said prothonotary written testimony from two well-known scientific men, certi-
fying to the good character and fitness of said applicant to be entrusted with such
privileges-and must pay to the said prothonotary the sum of one dollar to defray the
necessary expenses attending the granting of such certificates, and must file with the
said prothonotary a properly executed bond, in the sum of fifty dollars, signed by two
responsible citizens of the commonwealth as sureties. This bond shall be forfeited to
the commonwealth and the certificate become void upon proof that the holder of said
certificate has killed any bird, or taken the nest of any bird, for other than the pur-
poses named in sections three and four of this act, and shall be further subject, for
each such offence, to the penalties provided therefor in section seven of this act.
Sect. 5. The certificates authorized by this act shall be in force for one year only
from the date of their issue and shall not be transferrable.
Sect. 7. Any person or persons violating any of the provisions of this act shall be
deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by a fine of not less than ten nor more
than fifty dollars, or both, at the discretion of the court.
Act 15 Aprit 1891. Purd. 948.
Szct. 1. No person in any of the counties of this commonwealth shall kill, wound,
trap, net, snare, catch with bird lime or with any similar substance, poison or drug,
any bird of song, or any linnet, blue-bird, yellow-hammer, yellow-bird, thrush, wood-
pecker, cat-bird, pewee, martin, blue jay, oriole, kildeer, snow-bird, grass-bird, gros-
beak, bobolink, phoebe-bird, humming-bird, wren, robin, meadow-lark, night-hawk,
starling, or any wild-bird, other than a game bird. Nor shall any person purchase,
nor have in possession, or expose for sale, any of the aforesaid song or wild birds or
any part thereof, after the same shall have been killed. For the purpose of this act
the following shall be considered game birds: The anatids, commonly known as
swans, geese, brant, and river and sea ducks; the rallidse, commonly known as rails,.
coots, mud-hens and gallinules ; the limicolee, commonly known as shore-birds, plovers,.
surf-birds, snipe, woodcock, sand-pipers, tattlers and curlews; the gallinze, commonly-
known as wild turkeys, grouse, prairie chickens, pheasants, partridges and quail; the.
columbze, commonly known as doves and wild pigeon, and the birds commonly known
as reed-birds.
Sect. 2. The English or European house sparrow (passer domesticus), and the
various species of hawks, owls and crows are not included among the birds protected
by this act.
Srct. 3. In all actions for the recovery of penalties under this act, one-half of said
penalties shall be paid to the informer, and the balance shall be paid to the county
treasurer of the county wherein the offence is committed. *
Act 16 May 1891. Purd. 949.
Sect. 1. On and after the passage of this act it shall be unlawful for any person or
persons to shoot, maim or kill any Antwerp or homing pigeon, either while on flight
or at rest, and any person guilty of killing, shooting or maiming such pigeon or pigeons
as aforesaid, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof, shall, for
every such offence, pay a fine of not less than ten nor more than twenty-five dollars.
Sct. 2. On and after the passage of this act, it shall be unlawful for any person or
persons to detain or entrap any Antwerp or homing pigeon: Provided, however, That
such Antwerp or homing pigeon shall have the name of its owner stamped upon its
wing or tail, and any person or persons so detaining or entrapping such pigeon or
pigeons shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall, for every
such offence, pay a fine of not less than ten nor more than twenty-five dollars.
[ 516 J
Guaranty.
I. Definition of, and remedy upon a guarantee. III. Discharge of sureties.
II. When a guarantee must be in writing. IV. Judicial decisions.
I. A quaRANTY is a promise to answer for the payment of some debt, or the per-
formance of some duty, in case of the failure of another person, who is, in the first
instance, liable to such payment or performance.’ The distinction between a surety
and a guarantor is well settled, in Pennsylvania: the latter assumes but a contin-
gent liability; the engagement of the former is an absolute direct one.? And the
law in relation to these several contracts is different; in case of a guarantee,
the creditor must enforce his remedies against the principal debtor, before he resorts
to the guarantor, or else he must show that the affairs of the principal debtor were
in such a condition, that any pursuit of him would have proved fruitless ;? whilst
the only mode to be pursued by a surety is a positive call upon the creditor to pur-
sue the principal, with notice, that unless he does so, the surety will consider him-
self discharged.*
II. Act 26 Aprit 1855. Purd. 943.
Sxzor. 1. No action shall be brought whereby to charge any executor or admin-
istrator, upon any promise to answer damages out of his own estate, or whereby to
charge the defendant, upon any special promise, to answer for the debt or default
of another, unless the agreement upon which such action was brought, or some
memorandum or note thereof, shall be in writing and signed by the party to be
charged therewith, or by some other person by him authorized.
Sror. 2. This act shall not apply to or affect any contract the consideration of
which shall be a less sum than twenty dollars.
III. Aor 14 May 1874. Purd. 972.
Sror. 1. The surety or sureties in any instrument in writing for the forbearance
or payment of money at any future time, shall not be discharged from their liability
upon the same, by reason of notice from the surety or sureties, to the creditor or
creditors, to collect the amount thereof from the principal in said instruments,
unless such notice shall be in writing and signed by the party giving the same.
IV. In an action upon a guaranty, the consideration for it must be stated and
proved.® And in Pennsylvania, there must also be proof that the principal debtor
has been exhausted, or of his insolvency.6 But if at the maturity of the guaranty,
the principal debtor be utterly insolvent, it is not necessary to bring suit against
him, before proceeding on the guaranty; and the insolvency may be proved, not
only by record, but by parol evidence."| The mere demand of payment and refusal
to pay, is not sufficient evidence of insolvency, though the debtor be not a resident
of the commonwealth.’ -
What is due diligence is a question of fact for the jury, on the evidence submitted
to them. And where the promise is by parol, the jury are to determine whether
they imported a direct or a contingent liability.° Where a judgment has been
recovered against the principal debtor, and an execution issued, and returned “ no
goods,” the proceedings are prima facie evidence of his insolvency."
Words of doubtful import ought not to receive such a construction as to subject
the person using them to pay the debt of another.’ The proof of the promise must
be clear, explicit and certain; leaving no room for doubt or misapprehension.'
1 Fell on Guaranty 1. 7 15 Penn. St. 293.
2 6 Clark 74, 83P.& W.18.
83 P. & W. 18 1 Wall. Jr. 0. 0. 149. 100 916 S.& R. 79. 25 Penn. St. 210.
Penn. St. 103. 10 16 Leg. Int. 60.
4858. &R.116. 16 Penn. St. 13, Ml 25 Penn. St. 210. 30 Ibid. 205.
5 Fell on Guaranty 4. 12 31 Ibid. 69.
6 30 Penn. St. 205. 1 Wall. Jr. C. C. 149
GUARANTY. 517
Where one guaranties the payment of a sum of money on a day certain, the
ereditor, ¢¢ seems, when the period arrives, may sue on the contract of guaranty,
without pursuing the principal debtor.!’ In an addition on a guaranty, it is a good
defence, that collateral securities, assigned by the principal, at the time of making
the contract of guaranty, for the security of the same debt, have been lost through
the plaintiff’s want of diligence? A contract to guaranty the payment of rent
reserved in a lease, is not discharged by the lessor’s consent to an assignment of the
term; the lease providing that no assignment shall be valid without such consent.*
The act of 1855 requires that a promise to pay the debt of another should
be in writing; but where the consideration moves directly from the promisee to
the promisor, although the contract may be to perform work for a third person, the
statute has no application.‘
A contract required to be in writing must appear with reasonable certainty, with-
out recourse to parol proof, from the instrument itself ; and parol testimony cannot
be admitted, either to contradict or to vary it. An agreement made between parties
prior to, or contemporaneously with, their executing a written obligation as sureties,
by which one promises to indemnify the other from loss, does not contradict or vary
the terms or legal effect of the written obligation, and may be proved by parol
evidence The consideration upon which the contract is made, need not be ex-
pressed in writing, but may be proved by parol.”
To bring a case within the act, the promisee must be the original creditor? If
the old debt remain, the contract is not an original undertaking, and is therefore
within the statute.§ The agent contemplated by the statute, who is to bind the
defendant, in an action on a guarantee, by his signature, must be a third person,
and not one of the contracting parties.”
“Té is settled that the word ‘assign’ implies no guaranty.’’' The covenant im-
plied from the assignment of a bond is not a guaranty, but that the assignee should
receive the money from the obligor to his own use; and if the obligee should receive
it, then, that the assignor should be answerable over for it.”
To partnerships.— Attempts have been made to establish the guaranty as an
indemnity to the house of trade, rather than to the members composing it. But
after many decisions upon the subject, the principles applicable to such instru-
ments seem to be this, that as every partnership ceased to be the same if any
alteration is made in the parties of which it is composed, so the prospective opera-
tions of a guarantee given to a partnership will cease, upon any change, either by
the death or withdrawing of any of the partners, or the addition of the new one,
unless the guarantee itself contain some provision, contemplating such change, and
continuing its operations to the succeeding partnership.™
1 Bright. 96. 1M.276. 1Clark15. 1 Phila. 7 45 Penn. St. 345. And the date of the writing
. is not conclusive. 70 Ibid. 387.
2 31 Penn. St. 110. See 100 Ibid. 104. 8 25 Law Rep. 676.
3 30 Ibid. 205. 9 50 Penn. St. 52.
4 44 Ibid. 107. 45 Ibid. 30,186. 50 Ibid. 85. 10 4 Phila. 75. 5B. & Ald. 333.
54 Ibid. 118. 64 Ibid. 406. 16 Leg. Int. 60. 1178. & R. 502
And see 38 Penn. St. 302. 5 Phila. 147. 121 Dall. 449. 19 Penn. St. 133.
5 4 Phila. 75. See 31 Penn. St. 259-60. 1W. 18 Gow on Part. 147. See 16 Johns. 100. 86
v. C. 6. N. Y. 484.
6 12 N. Y. 462. °
[ 518 ]
Hawkers and Wedlars.
I. Hawkers’ and pedlers’ licences. III. Judicial decisions.
II. Tin and clock pedlars.
I. THE courts of quarter sessions of the respective counties in this common-
wealth, or two judges of said courts in vacation, are hereby authorized to issue a
licence to any applicant, * * * who shall give bond to the commonwealth of
Pennsylvania, with sureties to be approved of by the court, in the sum of $300,
conditioned that such applicant shall be of good behavior during the continuance
of such licence, which shall be for one year, and the said applicant shall satisfy the
court that he is a man of honesty and good moral character, and otherwise bring
himself within the provisions of said acts: Provided, That before any such licence
shall issue to any such applicant, he shall pay for the use of this commonwealth,
for a licence to travel on foot, eight dollars; with one horse and cart or wagon, or
other vehicle, sixteen dollars ; with two horses and wagon, or other vehicle, twenty-
five dollars; and produce a receipt from the county treasurer, together with the
usual fees to the clerk for similar services; and the clerks of said courts respectively,
shall, within ten days after each term, transmit to the auditor-general a list of the
names of persons to whom licences have been granted at the preceding term, and
the rates thereof: Provided, That no person licensed for the purpose aforesaid, shall
be permitted to sell, vend or expose to sale, any foreign or domestic goods, wares or
merchandise, in any private or public house, or in any of the open streets, lanes
or alleys, or in any other part or place of the city of Philadelphia, * * * under the
penalty of fifty dollars, to be recovered by any person who shall sue for the same,
as debts of like amount are by law recoverable : And provided further, That it shall
be the duty of the auditor-general to publish once a year the names of all persons
who shall take out a licence as aforesaid, in at least three papers within this com-
monwealth, for three successive weeks. ?
No person shall be licensed as hawker and pedlar, or petty chapman, within this
state, but such only as is a citizen of the United States, and who, from loss of
limb or other bodily infirmity, shall be disabled from procuring a livelihood by
labor, which disability shall be proven by certificate or certificates from two physi-
cians of respectable character, under oath, residing in the county where the appli-
cation for licence is made; and no licence hereafter granted shall extend farther
than the county in which such licence may have been granted, except wholesale
pedlars, whose licence shall extend throughout this state, for which they shall pay
for the use of the commonwealth, for a licence to travel with one horse and wagon,
or other vehicle, forty dollars; with two horses and a wagon, or other vehicle, fifty
dollars.?
No person shall be licensed as a hawker or pedlar under the several acts of
assembly now in force, unless he shall have resided at least one year in the county
in which such application shallbe made, and shall produce satisfactory evidence, on
oath, from at least two respectable practising physicians, who shall be citizens.
of the United (States), residents in such county, that such applicant is, in point of
fact, by reason of bodily disability (the nature and character of which shall be
stated), unable to procure a livelihood at his trade, if he have any, or by bodily
labor.
It shall be the duty of the county treasurers, respectively, on or before the second
Tuesday in December, in each and every year, to render an account, under oath or
affirmation, to the auditor-general, of all moneys received by them for licences, speci-
fying the names of the persons and the amount received from each, and pay over to
the state treasurer all moneys received by them, deducting therefrom a commission
of five per cent.; and if any county treasurer shall neglect or refuse to render his
1 Act 2 April 1830 31. Purd. 1654. In cities 2 Act 16 April 1840 31. Purd. 1654.
of the second and third class, they must also 8 Act 5 May 184137. Ibid. 1655,
obtain a municipal license, by act 10 June 1881,
Purd. 1657.
HAWKERS AND PEDLARS., 519
account to the auditor-general for settlement, and pay over the full amount to the
state treasurer, as hereinbefore directed, such treasurer shall not be allowed any
compensation or commission.!
No person or persons, either with or without licence, shall sell or expose to sale,
any foreign or domestic goods, wares or merchandise, as a hawker or pedlar, or
travelling merchant, by public auction or outcry, in any part of this commonwealth,
under the penalty of fifty dollars for each and every offence ; and all forfeitures that
may accrue under this act, or the acts to which this is a further supplement, may
be sued for and recovered by action of debt, before any alderman or justice of the
peace, as debts of like amount are by law recoverable, by any person who may sue
for the same, one-half to the informer, and the other half to the use of the county
in which the offence may have been committed: * * * Provided, nevertheless, That
nothing contained in this act shall prohibit the citizens of this commonwealth, who
may manufacture goods, wares or merchandise within this commonwealth, from
vending or exposing the same to sale in the same manner as if said act had not
been passed into a law.?
If any person not being licensed as aforesaid, except such whose licenses have or
may not yet be expired, shall be found hawking, peddling or travelling from place to
place through any part of this state to sell, or expose for sale, any foreign or domestic
goods, wares or merchandise, every person so offending against this act shall be liable
to a fine of fifty dollars; or being so qualified by the license, shall refuse on request of
any citizen of this state to show his license, every person so offending shall be liable to
a fine of twenty dollars, to be recovered and applied in the same manner as is provided
for by the act for regulating hawkers and pedlars and its several supplements, passed
the thirtieth day of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty-four: * Provided,
That this act shall not be construed to prevent citizens of this commonwealth from
hawking and peddling goods of their own manufacture, by themselves or through their
authorized agents.‘
If any person having a licence shall lend or otherwise dispose of the same to any
other person, the person so lending and the person so receiving the same shall be
liable to a fine of fifty dollars, respectively ; which fines shall be recovered and applied
as by the act to which this is a supplement is directed and provided.®
No person or persons shall sell or expose to sale, within the county of Schuylkill,
ag a hawker, pedlar or travelling merchant, any foreign or domestic goods, wares or
merchandise, under the penalty of fifty dollars for each and.every offence, to be
inflicted in the manner provided for in the act of April 6th, 1833, entitled “a
supplement to the act regulating auctions in the city of Lancaster and other towns
of this commonwealth,” passed the 7th day of April 1832.6
It shall be lawful for the manufacturers of agricultural tools and implements,
stoves, hollow-ware and wooden ware, to peddle their own manufacture, or authorize
agents to peddle the same for them: Provided, That the provisions of this act shall
the same, it shall be his duty to issue a warrant
for the apprehension of such person, and compel
him to enter into a recognisance with sufficient
sureties for his appearance at the next court of
1 Act 2 April 1830 23. Purd. 1655.
2 Thid. 2 2.
The act of 1784 is supplied by that of 1830
4 Act 9 May 1889. Purd. 1655.
5 Act 28 March 179932. Ibid. -
§ Act 17 April 1846 31. Ibid. 1656. By sub-
sequent acts, the act 17 April 1846 is extended
to the counties of Lebanon, Elk, Cumberland,
Perry, Carbon, Berks, Luzerne, Columbia, Monroe,
Mercer, Lancaster, Butler, Union, Somerset, Bed-
ford, York, Montgomery, Lycoming and Arm-
strong; and also to the county of Fayette, with
reference to the peddling of tin and copper ware,
This prohibition, however, is partially repealed,
by various special local statutes, as to particular
counties, for which reference must he had to the
pamphlet laws.
The act of 1833, here referred to, provides that
the mode of proceeding against any person for a
violation of its provisions, shall be by indictment
in the court of quarter sessions of the proper
county; and that whenever complaint shall be
made to any justice of the peace or alderman of
the proper county or city, on oath or affirmation
against any person for violating the provisions of
quarter sessions of the proper county, to answer
the said complaint ; and any person being thereof
duly convicted, shall pay a fine for the use of the
commonwealth, of not less than fifty nor more
than five hundred dollars, at the discretion of the
court, together with the costs of prosecution. See
Purd. 158, pl. 30.
‘See act 12 April 1851 3 4, Pamph. 441, for
similar provisions as to Northumberland county ;
and act 20 April 1854 3 1, Pamph. 418, as to the
counties of Lehigh, Dauphin, Sullivan, Wyoming
and Bucks. By act 25 March 1856 3 1, Pamph.
178, it is provided, that in all prosecutions under
the act 20 April 1854 (except in Wyoming county)
the informer shall be entitled to one-half the
penalty. And by act 8 April 1857 3 1, Pamph.
177, the provisions of the act 20 April 1854, are
extended to Susquehanna county; but by act 16
May 1857 2 1, Pamph. 537, this is not to be con-
strued to prevent the peddling of domestic goods
manufactured within the said county of Susque-
hanna.
520 HAWKERS AND PEDLARS.
not extend to any portion of the state east of the Allegheny mountains or to the county
of Armstrong.’ : :
Every honorably discharged soldier, sailor and marine, of the military or naval ser-
vice of the United States, who isa resident of this state, and who is unable to pro-
cure a livelihood by manual labor, shall have the right to hawk, peddle and vend any
goods, wares or merchandise, or solicit trade within this commonwealth, by procuring
a license for that purpose to be issued without cost: Provided, That before any such
soldier, sailor or marine shall be entitled to the benefits of this act, he shall present
his certificate of pension which shall be evidence of his disability; if no pensioner,
shall obtain a certificate from an examining surgeon of the United States that he is
unable to procure his living by manual labor, and shall also procure a certificate from
the prothonotary of any county in this state that he has filed in the office of said
prothonotary, his affidavit, setting forth that he is the bond side owner in his own
right of all the goods, wares and merchandise which he proposes to hawk, peddle
and vend, and that he will not engage to sell the same for any other person or
persons whatever: And provided further, That the aforesaid certificate, together
with such person’s discharge from the military or naval service, or an exemplified
copy thereof, shall be full and conclusive evidence of such person’s rights to the
benefits of this act.?
II. Tin and clock pediars.—No person shall employ himself or be concerned in
the business or employment of hawking or peddling any kind of tin or japanned
ware or clocks, from place to place, without having previously obtained a licence so
to do, under the provisions of the second section of this act ; and if any person shall
go from place to place, to sell or expose to sale any such articles without a licence so
to do being by him first obtained, such person shall forfeit and pay the sum of fifty
dollars; and any justice of the peace or alderman, on view, or the information or
complaint, on oath or affirmation, of any other person, shall and in either case is
hereby enjoined to proceed in a summary way against any such person so offending
to conviction ; and in default of immediate payment of said forfeiture, to commit
him to the common jail of said county, there to be detained until discharged by due
course of law; and every repetition of the said offence shall be considered and
punished as a new offence. And every person so employed, who upon demand shall
refuse to exhibit his licence, shall be deemed an offender against this act ; and one-
half of the penalties, which may accrue under the provisions of this act, shall go to
the informer, and the other half to the county in which they may happen; and any
such informer, notwithstanding his interest, shall be a competent witness.°
The clerks of the courts of quarter sessions of the respective counties of this
commonwealth are hereby authorized to grant separate licences for one year, under
seal of said court, to hawkers and pedlars of tin and japanned ware, and to hawkers
and pedlars of clocks, upon satisfactory evidence of the good moral character of
such applicant, he having first produced a receipt from the county treasurer for
thirty dollars; and it shall be the duty of the said clerks respectively, upon grant-
ing such licence, immediately to transmit a certificate thereof to the auditor-general,
who shall charge the county treasurer with the sum so received; and the county
treasurers shall receive a like commission, and be subject to the same duties,
restrictions and penalties, connected with their accountability under this act, as
are provided in the 5th section of the act, entitled “an act laying a duty on re-
tailers of foreign merchandise,” and the applicant shall pay to the clerk like fees
as for similar services.‘
IIT. A certificate that the applicant for a pedlar’s licence is affected with gastro-
hepatalgia, is not sufficient evidence of bodily disability, unaccompanied by the
reasons on which it is founded.
1 Act 14 April 1863 31. Purd. 1656.
2 Act 9 June 1891. Purd. 1656. By act 17
April 1869, this act is to give no authority
And that licenses shall not be transferrible.
Pamph, 1180.
8 Act 6 February 1830 31. Purd. 1657.
to peddle in Lancaster county, unless a license
be granted by the court of quarter sessions of
that county; and the court is only to grant
licenses to those who were residents of Lan-
caster county, at the time of their enlistment.
4 Ibid. 3 2. See act 31 March 1836 3 7. Purd.
1658, as to Susquehanna county; which was ex-
tended to Bradford county by act 1851, Pamph.
646.
5 4 Clark 188,
HOLIDAYS. 621
The sale of a single article subjects the offender to the penalty for selling without
license.!. The penalty imposed by the act of 1799 is not incurred by the licensee by
the employment of a servant to sell for him; but the servant is liable to the penalty
for selling without a license.? Justices have jurisdiction of an action for the penalty ; *
but an appeal lies from the judgment.*
Selling goods from a canal boat, isa violation of the act of 1840.5 So, an auc-
tioneer who sells his goods by auction in another town than that in which his place of
business is located, incurs the penalty for peddling without license. To constitute a
sale by auction, there must be either successive bids for the property, or successive
offerings, at different prices, in a way to provoke competition ; offering goods publicly
at a specified*price, is no violation of the act.”
The prohibition against selling foreign goods does not to extend to goods made in
another state of the Union.* The act of 1820 does not embrace tin and clock ped-
lars; they are governed by that of 1830.°
Holidays.
Act 31 May 1893. Purd. 986.
Sect. 1. The following days and half days, namely: the first day of January, com-
monly called New Year’s day; the twenty-second day of February, known as Wash-
ington’s birthday; Good Friday ; the thirtieth day of May, known as Memorial day ;
the fourth of July, called Independence day; the first Saturday in September, known
as Labor day ; the first Tuesday after the first Monday of November, Election day ; the
twenty-fifth day of December, known as Christmas day; and every Saturday after
twelve o’clock noon until twelve o’clock midnight, each of which Saturdays is hereby
designated a half-holiday, and any day appointed or recommended by the governor of
this state or the president of the United States as a day of thanksgiving or fasting
and prayer or other religious observance shall, for all purposes whatever as regards
the presenting for payment or acceptance, and as regards the protesting and giving
notice of the dishonor of bills of exchange, checks, drafts and promissory notes, made
after the passage of this act, be treated and considered as the first day of the week,
commonly called Sunday, and as public holidays and half-holidays.
All such bills, checks, drafts and notes otherwise presentable for acceptance or pay-
ment on any of the said days shall be deemed to be payable and be presentable for
acceptance or payment on the secular or business day next succeeding such holiday
or half-holiday, except checks, drafts, bills of exchange and promissory notes, payable
at sight or on demand, which would otherwise be payable at any half- holiday Satur-
day, shall be deemed to be payable at or before twelve o’clock noon of such half-holi-
day: Provided, however, That for the purpose of protesting or otherwise holding
liable any party to any bill of exchange, check, draft or promissory note, and which
shall not have been paid before twelve o’clock noon of any Saturday designated a
half-holiday, as aforesaid, a demand or acceptance or payment thereof shall not be
made and notice or protest or dishonor thereof shall not be given until the next suc-
ceeding secular or business day.
When any person, firm, corporation or company shall, on any Saturday designated
a half-holiday, receive for collection any check, bill of exchange, draft or promissory
note, such person, firm, corporation or company, shall not be deemed guilty of any
neglect or omission of duty, nor incur any liability in not presenting for payment or
1148. & BR. 398. 6 1 Chest. Co. R. 77.
263 Penn. St. 168. T1W.&S. 552-3.
33 Clark 34, 8 62 Penn. St. 15.
£7 Phila. 303. 92 W. 300.
5 13 Penn. St. 336.
522 HOLIDAYS.
acceptance, or collection, such check, bill of exchange, draft or promissory note on
that day. ‘
In construing this section every Saturday designated a half-holiday shall, until
twelve o'clock noon, be deemed a secular or business day, and the days and half-holi-
days aforesaid, so designated as holidays and half-holidays, shall be considered as
public holidays and half-holidays, for all purposes whatsoever as regards the transac-
tion of business.
Nothing herein contained shall be construed to prevent or invalidate the entry,
issuance, service or execution of any writ, summons, confession of judgment or other
legal process whatever on any of the Saturday afternoons herein designated as holi-
days, nor to prevent any bank from keeping its doors open or transacting its business
on any of the said Saturday afternoons if, by a vote of its directors, it shall elect to
do so.
Whenever the first day of January, the twenty second day of February, the fourth
day of July or the twenty-fifth day of December shall any of them occur on Sunday,
the following day, Monday, shall be deemed and declared a public holiday. All bills
of exchange, checks, drafts or promissory notes falling due on any of the Mondays so
observed as holidays, shall be due and payable on the next succeeding secular or busi-
ness day, and all Mondays so observed as holidays shall, for all purposes whatever as
regards the presenting for payment or acceptance, and as regards the protesting and
giving notice of the dishonor of bills of exchange, checks, drafts and promissory
notes, made after the passage of this act, be treated and considered as is the first day
of the week, commonly called Sunday.
When the thirtieth day of May falls on Sunday, the day preceding it, Saturday,
shall be observed as the holiday, and payment of bills of exchange, checks, drafts
and promissory notes, due and payable on such holiday, shall be made on the next
succeeding secular or business day.
All bills of exchange, checks, drafts and promissory notes made after the passage of
this act, which by the terms thereof shall be payable on the first day of the week,
commonly called Sunday, shall be deemed to be and shall be payable on the next suc-
ceeding secular or business day.
All the days and half days herein designated as legal holidays shall be regarded as
secular or business days for all other purposes than those mentioned in this act.
Act 23 May 1893. Purd. 987.
The third Tuesday of February of each year, and the first Tuesday after the first
Monday of November of each year, be and the same are hereby designated as legal
half-holidays from twelve o’clock noon until midnight of such days, and shall for all
purposes whatsoever as regards the presenting for payment or acceptance, and as re-
gards the protesting and giving notice of the dishonor of bills of exchange, checks,
drafts and promissory notes, made after the passage of this act, be treated and consid-
ered as the first day of the week, commonly called Sunday, and as public holidays and
half-holidays, and all such bills, checks, drafts and notes, otherwise presentable for ac-
ceptance or payment on any of the said days, shall be deemed to be payable and be
presentable for acceptance or payment at or before twelve o’clock noon on such half-
holidays.
[ 523 J
Homicide.
I. Degrees of homicide. III. Judicial decisions,
II. Provisions of the Penal Code.
I. Homrcrpg, or the killing of any human creature, is of three kinds: felonious,
excusable and justifiable.*
Felonious homicide is the killing of a human creature of any age or sex, without
justification or excuse.? Jt is either murder or manslaughter, according to the
circumstances.®
Murder, as defined by the common law, is when a person of sound memory and
discretion unlawfully killeth any reasonable creature in being, and in the peace of
the commonwealth, with malice prepense or aforethought, either express or implied.‘
Hixpress malice, is where the killing is the product of a sedate, deliberate mind,
and formed design. Malice implied, or in a legal sense, means that the fact hath
been attended with such circumstances as are the ordinary symptoms of a wicked,
depraved and malignant spirit, a heart regardless of social duty, and fatally bent on
mischiet's
By act of 22d April 1794, re-enacted in 1860, murder, in Pennsylvania, is
divided into two degrees. ‘ All murder which shall be perpetrated by means of
poison, or by lying in wait, or by any other kind of wilful, deliberate and premedi-
tated killing, or which shall be committed in the perpetration, or attempt to perpe-
trate any arson, rape, robbery or burglary, shall be deemed murder of the first
degree.” All other kinds of murder shail be deemed murder of the second degree.’
In order to constitute murder in the first degree, it is not only necessary that the
act of killing should be wilful, premeditated, malicious, legally unjustifiable and
inexcusable, but the act of violence must be specifically directed against life.*
Murder in the second degree includes all cases of deliberate homicide, where the
intention is not to take life; of which, homicide by a workman throwing timber
from a house into the street of a populous city, without warning; or of a person
shooting at a fowl, animo furandi [with intent to steal], and killing a man, are
instances frequently given.®
Manslaughter is the unlawful and felonious killing of another, without any malice,
either express or implied. It is of two kinds: 1st. Voluntary manslaughter, which
is the unlawful killing of another without malice, either upon sudden quarrel, or
unintentionally, while the slayer is in the commission of some unlawful act, not
amounting to felony ; 2d. Involuntary manslaughter, where a man doing an unlawful
act, not amounting to felony, by accident kills another.”
Excusable homicide is of two kinds: 1st. Where a man doing a lawful act with-
out any intention of hurt, by accident kills another ; as, for instance, where a tan
is hunting in a park, and unintentionally kills a person concealed. This is called
homicide per infortunium, or by misadventure. 2d. Where a man kills another
upon immediate attack, merely in his own defence, or in defence of his wife, child,
parent or servant, and not from any feeling of revenge or malice ; which is termed
homicide se defendendo [in self defence].”
Justifiable homicide is of three kinds: 1st. Where the proper officer executes a
criminal, in strict conformity with his sentence. 2d. Where an officer of justice, in
the legal exercise of a particular duty, kills a person who resists or prevents him
from exercising it. 38d. Where the homicide is committed in the prevention of a
forcible and atrocious crime; as, for instance, when the deceased was in the act of
robbing or murdering another.”
1 4 Bl. Com. 177. 7 Purd. 510.
2 Tbhid. 188. 8 2 Ash. 41.
3 Lewis’ Cr. L. 353. ® Whart. Cr. L. 31107. 4 Clark 500.
41 Ash, 289, 2 Clark 366. 4 Ibid. 500. 19 Whart. Cr. L. ¢ 932-3. 101 Penn. St. 327.
8 Thid. 1 Whart. Or. L. 2 934.
6 Ibid. 58 Penn. St. 9. 12 Tbid. $ 936-8.
524 HOMICIDE.
II. Aor 31 Marca 1860. Purd. 510.
Szor. 74. All murder which shall be perpetrated by means of poison, or by lying
in wait, or by any other kind of wilful, deliberate and premeditated killing, or which
shall be committed in the perpetration of, or attempt to perpetrate, any arson, rape,
robbery or burglary, shall be deemed murder of the first degree, and all other kinds
of murder shall be deemed murder of the second degree ; and the jury before whom
any person indicted for murder shall be tried, shall, if they find such person guilty
thereof, ascertain in their verdict whether it be murder of the first or second degree;
but if such person shall be convicted by confession, the court shall proceed, by
examination of witnesses, to determine the degree of. the crime, and to give sentence
accordingly.
Scr. 75. Every person convicted of the crime of murder of the first degree, his
aiders, abettors and counsellors, shall be sentenced to suffer death, by hanging by
the neck; and it shall be the duty of the clerk of the court wherein such conviction
takes place, and he is hereby required, within ten days after such sentence, to
transmit a full and complete record of the trial and conviction to the governor of
this commonwealth.
Scr. 76. Every person duly convicted of the crime of murder of the second
degree, shall, for the first offence, be sentenced to undergo an imprisonment, by
separate or solitary confinement, not exceeding twelve years, and for the second
offence, for the period of his natural life.
Ssct. 77. Every person liable at any former period to be prosecuted for petit
treason, shall in future be indicted, proceeded against and punished as is directed
in other kinds of murder.
Szcr. 78. Every person convicted of any voluntary manslaughter, shall be sen-
tenced to pay a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars, and to undergo an imprison-
ment, by separate or solitary confinement at labor, or simple imprisonment, not
exceeding twelve years, and in the discretion of the court, to give security for
good behavior during life, or for any less time, according to the nature and enormity
of the offence.
Sxot. 79. If any person shall be charged with involuntary manslaughter, happen-
ing in consequence of an unlawful act, it shall and may be lawful for the district-
attorney, with the leave of the court, to waive the felony and to proceed against
and charge such person with a misdemeanor, and to give in evidence any act or
acts of manslaughter; and such person, on conviction, shall be sentenced to pay
a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars, and to suffer an imprisonment not exceed-
ing two years; or the district-attorney may charge both wilful and involuntary
manslaughter in the same indictment, in which case the jury may acquit the party
of one, and find him or her guilty of the other charge.
Szcr. 81. If any person shall administer, or cause to be administered or taken
by another, any poison or other destructive thing, or shall stab, cut or wound any
person, or shall, by any means whatsoever, cause any person bodily injury, danger-
ous to life, with intention, in any of the cases aforesaid, to commit murder, such
person shall be guilty of felony, and shall, on conviction, be sentenced to pay a fine
not exceeding one thousand dollars, and to undergo an imprisonment, by separate
or solitary confinement at labor, not excceding seven years.!
Sscr. 82. If any person shall attempt to administer any poison, or other destruc-
tive thing, or shall attempt to cut or stab or wound, or shall shoot at any person,
or shall, by drawing a trigger, or in any other manner, attempt to discharge any
kind of loaded arms at any person, or shall attempt to drown, suffocate or strangle
any person, with intent, in any of the cases aforesaid, to commit the crime of mur-
der, he shall, although no bodily injury be effected, be guilty of felony, and be
sentenced to pay a fine of one thousand dollars, and undergo an imprisonment, by
separate or solitary confinement, not exceeding seven years.
IIT. Murder in the first degree is where a felonious and malicious homicide is
committed with a specific intent to take life’ But the intent of the defendant
Purd. 477. 4 Ibid. 500. Add. 283. 2 Brewst. 546. 1
2 Thid. Wood. 423.
824 Penn. St. 386. 58 Ibid. 9, 2 Clark 261.
HOMICIDE. 625
is to be collected from his words and actions.’ In the absence of evidence to the
contrary, the law presumes an intent to kill, from the use of a deadly weapon ;? but
the presumption rises no higher than murder in the second degree.®
if the killing is by one in the attempt to commit a rape, burglary, robbery or arson,
the intention is of no consequence ; it is murder in the first degree. But to con-
stitute murder in the first degree, under this clause of the statute, there must be an
attempt to perpetrate one of the enumerated offences ; an intent merely is not enough$
Under the act of assembly, an nnlawful killing, though it may be presumed mur-
der, will not be presumed murder in the first degree; the burden of proving it
so lies on the commonwealth.”
Murder in the second degree is, where a felonious and malicious homicide is
committed, but without a specific intent to take lite® If death result from desire
to do great bodily harm, and the act is not excused by heat of sudden quarrel, or
on the doctrine of self-defence, it is murder in the second degree.® :
A felonious homicide committed by one in a state of intoxication, is murder in
the second degree; when the mind, from intoxication, or any other cause, is
deprived of its power to form a design with deliberation and premeditation, the
offence is stripped of the malignant feature required by the statute to place it in
the list of capital crimes.° But the degree of intoxication that will have such
effect, must be that degree of drunkenness which deprives one of the power of
judging of his acts, and their legitimate consequences." The true criterion as to
the capability of the prisoner to commit murder in the first degree is, not whether
he was drunk or sober, but whether he had the power, at the time, deliberately to
form and plan in his mind, the design and intention of killing his victim. If, from
intoxication, or other cause, the mind is deprived of the power to plan, deliberate
upon and purpose the death of another, if such act is the result of impulse, not of
deliberation, then the perpetrator is not guilty of murder in the first degree.
Involuntary manslaughter is, where it plainly appears that neither death nor any
great bodily harm was intended ; but death is accidentally caused by some unlawful
act, not amounting to felony; or an act not strictly unlawful in itself, but done in
an unlawful manner, and without due caution.” What is carelessness, and what is
due care, are matters of fact to be determined by a jury, in each particular case as
it arises.1*
One indicted for murder, cannot be convicted of involuntary manslaughter; it
must be prosecuted and punished as a misdemeanor.’®
Where a known felony is attempted upon the person, be it to rob or murder, the
party assaulted may repel force by force; and even his servant, attendant on him,
or any other person present, may interpose for preventing mischief; and if death
ensue, the party so interposing will be justified."* When engaged in the suppres-
sion of dangerous riots, the sheriff and his assistants are authorized to resort to
every necessary means to restore the public peace, and prevent the commission of
criminal outrages against person or property. They may arrest the rioters, detain and
imprison them. If they resist the sheriff and his assistants in their endeavors to
apprehend them, and continue their riotous actions, under such circumstances, the
killing then becomes justifiable”
The killing of one who appears to be an assailant, is excusable, if there be
reasonable apprehension of loss of life, or of great bodily harm, and it appear
80 imminent at the moment of assault, as to present no alternative of escaping its
consequences, but by resistance, even if it turn out afterwards that there was
no actual danger.
14 Dall. 146. Add. 163, 257. 1 Ash. 289. 2 Penn. St. 579.
Ibid. 41. ll 44 Penn. St. 55. 3 Phila. 229. 1 Brewst.
2 31 Penn. St. 198. 58 Ibid. 9. 78 Ibid. 185. 349. 2 Ibid. 546. And see 37 Penn. St. 45. 3
84 Ibid. 80. 42 Leg. 489. C. & K. 319. 4 Cr. 0. 0. 605. 3 Greenl. Evid.
3 42 Leg. 207. 2148. Whart. Cr. L. 3 41.
47W.& 8.418. 1 Bro. app’x 18. 12 3 Phila. 235. 37 Penn. St. 45. And see 44
5 1 Gr. 484. Ibid. 55. 32 Pitts. L. J. 415.
6 Add. 282-3. 58 Penn. St. 10. 178. & R. 428. 2 Pars, 447.
7 1 Whart. Dig. 478, pl. 109. 14 1 Pitts. 13. :
89 Clark 56. Add. 283. Bright. 186. 2.Ash, 17 S.& R. 423. 2 Pars. 447. 44 Penn. St
227. 1 Brewst. 349. 2 Ibid. 553. - 135. 2 Wood. 288.
9 1 Brewst. 352. 2 Ibid. 546, 553. 16 2 Clark 370.
101 Am, L. J. 149. Lewis’ Or. L. 405. 1 Gr, 1% Ibid. 285.
484, 75 Penn. St. 4038. 18 N.Y. 9. See 100 18 38 Penn. St. 265. 2 N. ¥. 197.
[ 526 J
‘3 ,
Worse-hacing.
I. Act for the suppression of horse-racing. II. Judicial authorities.
J. Act 17 Fesruary 1820. Purd. 988, 989.
Szor. 1. All racing, running, pacing or trotting of horses, mares or geldings, for
money, goods or chattels, or other valuable things, shall be, and hereby are declared
to be common nuisances and offences against this state; and the authors, parties,
contrivers and abettors thereof, shall be prosecuted and proceeded against by
indictment.
Srct. 2. Hach horse, mare or gelding used or employed by the owner thereof, or
with his consent, in any race on which any bet or wager shall have been laid,
or any purse or stakes shall have been made, shall be liable to be forfeited for the
proper county within which such horse, mare or gelding so forfeited shall have
been employed contrary to the foregoing provisions; and the said horse, mare or
gelding so forfeited, shall, at any time within two months thereafter, be seized by
any overseer of the poor or supervisor of the highways of the township in which
such race shall have been run, or by the sheriff or any of his deputies of the county
within which such township shall be situated ; and in case of seizure as aforesaid,
the officer so seizing shall make information thereof to the next court of common
pleas for the county, and such court shall proceed to hear and decide upon such
seizure. And in case such horse, mare or gelding shall have been adjudged to be
forfeited, such court shall order a sale thereof at public auction, and shall direct
the proceeds, after the costs of condemnation shall have been deducted, to be paid
to the treasurer of the proper county.
Sxot. 3. All wagers and bets which shall have been laid, betted or made on the
racing, running, pacing or trotting of horses, mares or geldings, and all promises,
agreements, notes, bills, bonds, contracts, judgments, mortgages or other securities
or conveyances, which shall have been made, given, granted, drawn, entered into or
executed by any person or persons, where the whole or any part of the consideration
thereof shall be, for any money, goods, chattels or other thing won, laid or betted
on the running, racing, trotting or pacing of any horses, mares or geldings, shall be
utterly void and of no effect.
Szcr. 4. It shall and may be lawful for any person who shall lose money, goods
or chattels, or any other valuable thing on the racing, running, pacing or trotting
of horses, mares or geldings, and shall pay or deliver the same, or any part thereof,
to the winner or other person for his use, or in his behalf, to recover the same or
the value thereof from such winner, with costs, by action of debt, or on the case, in
any court of record having cognisance thereof: Provided always, That such suit
shall have been instituted within two calendar months after such losing and pay-
ment and delivery as aforesaid.
Szor 5. If any person shall contribute to or collect, or shall ask or desire any
other person to contribute to or collect, any money, goods or chattels to make up a
purse, plate or other thing to be run, paced or trotted for as aforesaid, at any place
within this commonwealth, such person so offending shall forfeit and pay the sum
of thirty dollars for each offence.
Szor. 6. If any person or persons within this state shall print or cause to be
printed, set. up or cause to be set up, any advertisement mentioning the time and
place for the running, pacing or trotting of any horses, mares or geldings, or shall
knowingly suffer any advertisement as aforesaid to be set up, in or upon his, her or
their dwelling-house, or out-houses, or shall knowingly suffer the same to remain up
ee every person so offending shall forfeit and pay the sum of twenty
ollars.
Szor. 7. Each and all of the penalties specified in the 5th and 6th sections of this
HORSE:RACING. 527
act, shall be sued for and recovered by the overseer or overseers of the poor of the
township wherein the offence shall have been committed, in the name of such town-
ship, within two calendar months thereafter, by action of debt, with costs of suit, in
any court having cognisance thereof, and the proceeds thereof shal! be applied to the
use of the poor of the said township; and in case there shall not be in any county or
counties, overseers of the poor, then and in that case it shall be the duty of the super-
visor or supervisors of the highways of the proper township, and they are hereby re-
quired, to execute the duties hereinbefore directed to be performed, and in that case
the proceeds thereof shall be applied to the improvement of the roads of said town-
ship: And it is hereby declared to be the special duty of every such overseer of the
poor or supervisors of the highways, on his own knowledge of the fact, or on informa-
tion thereof by any person or persons, without delay, to institute and prosecute to
effect each and every suit or suits, under the penalty of ten dollars for each default,
to be recovered by any person or persons who shall sue for the same, by action of
debt, with costs of suit; and in case any suit or suits so to be brought by the said
overseer or overseers of the poor, and supervisor or supervisors of the highways, shall
fail, the costs that may be payable by him or them, shall be paid or reimbursed out of
any moneys appropriated for the use of the poor or for the improvement of the public
highways.
Sect. 8. The said overseer or overseers, and supervisor or supervisors, shall be
entitled to retain in his or their hands twenty-five :per centum on all sums which
he or they may receive by virtue of this act, as a compensation for his or their trouble.
Act 1 May 1879. Purd. 988 n.
So amends sections 1 and 2 of the act 17 February 1820, “‘as not to apply to agri-
cultural societies offering premiums for trials of speed in horses walking, trotting and
pacing or to trials of speed in horses in any incorporated driving park.”
Act 11 June 1891. Purd. 988.
So much of an act of assembly of the commonwealth of Pennsylvania, entitled ‘“‘An
act against horse-racing,’’ approved February seventeenth, one thousand eight hun-
dred and twenty, as provides for the forfeiture of horses used in racing contrary to
the provisions of said act, shall hereafter be held not to apply to horses used in races
given by regularly incorporated trotting associations.
Act 6 June 1893. Purd. 988.
Srcr. 1. It is hereby made unlawful for any person or persons to enter or cause to
be entered for competition, or to compete for any purse, prize, premium, stake or
sweepstake offered or given by any agricultural or other society, association or person
or persons, in the state of Pennsylvania, any horse, mare or gelding, colt or filly,
under an assumed name, or out of its proper class, when such prize, purse, premium,
stake or sweepstake is to be decided by a contest, in trotting or pacing races.
Sxcr. 2. Any person or persons found guilty of a violation of section one of this act
shall, upon conviction thereof, be imprisoned not exceeding six months, or fined
not exceeding five hundred dollars, or both, or either, at the discretion of the
court.
* The act 22 March 1817 (Purd. 989) provides for the punishment for horse-racing
on the public highways in Philadelphia county.
II. The following charge of Judge Parsons, in the case of The Commonwealth v.
Francis D. Way, tried in the court of quarter sessions of Philadelphia county, on
the 30th October 1849, recommends itself to the magistracy, as containing a clear
and lucid exposition of the law on the subject of fast driving on the public high-
ways.
528 : HORSE-RACING.
“This is an indictment for an assault and battery. The facts adduced to sustain
the offence present a case which is not of ordinary occurrence. While the principles
of law involved are familiar to the court, and have often been laid down to juries by
us, in cases which have arisen for rapid and immoderate driving in the city and incor-
porated districts in the county, this is the first case which has been presented to the
court, charging an individual with a violation of law, by driving his horse in an im-
moderate and improper manner on any of the great roads and highways not in the
immediate vicinity of the densely populated parts of our city and county.
“Indictments have been repeatedly preferred against the drivers of omnibuses,
hacks and other vehicles, for driving through the streets of our city at a rapid gait,
and thereby inflicting personal violence upon those who are passing along our streets ;
and this court has invariably instructed the jury, if they believed an individual was
driving his horses past in a manner so rapid as to endanger the persons of those
who were quietly passing along the public streets, and thereby caused personal in-
jury to another, the individual thus driving was guilty of an assault and battery.
Nay, we have gone further, and held that if one drove his vehicle in a reckless, care-
less and incautious manner, he was responsible for all the consequences which followed
the act.
“But the general impression seems to have prevailed in the community, that these
principles do not apply in relation to the conduct of individuals on a great avenue
like Broad street. This is a mistake. The law relative to roads and highways is
this: All persons have an equal right to pass and repass upon them with their
horses, carts and carriages, or on foot, at their pleasure; and one has no greater
privilege than another relative to their use. And while persons are thus upon the
highway, they are bound to drive in such a nianner as not to injure others who are
passing thereon; for we must remember that its free use is the same to each. No
persons, when travelling upon a great thoroughfare, have a right to race their horses,
so as to endanger the lives or persons of others passing at the same time, If they
do, the law holds them responsible for the injuries which other travellers sustain by
such unauthorized acts. Gentlemen who wish to try the speed of their horses
should select the race-course, and not encroach upon the liberty which other travel-
lers enjoy, who are at the same time passing upon a public road; nor is there any-
thing unreasonable in this. For why should one citizen yield his rights to gratify the
sportive tastes of another?
‘‘Tf one drives his horse at a rapid and immoderate gait along a public road,
faster than people usually drive, no matter what motive induces the act, and while
thus accelerating the speed of his horse, he injures the person of another, he is guilty
of an assault and battery—and if, in so doing, he should cause the death of the indi-
vidual injured, he would be guilty of manslaughter. While all are at liberty to travel
on the road, and drive as may suit their tastes or convenience, they are responsible
for their conduct, if any injury ensues, by departing from the ordinary method in
which travellers commonly use the roads. These views are founded upon the great
and fundamental principle of the law, that all have equal rights, and each must use
his own in such a way as not to injure his neighbor.?
“It was contended by the defendant’s counsel, that the prosecutor had no right
to be riding upon Broad street with his wife. I regretted to hear this remark. We
instruct you that he had an unquestioned right to travel there with his wife; all citi-
zens are at liberty to ride there with their wives and families, and this great and
beautiful avenue is not appropriated to any privileged class. You, gentlemen of the
jury, may desire to bring your families from the country to the city, along this fine
street; it isthe great leading road to a number of cemeteries in the vicinity of the
city; funeral processions are almost daily passing along this street ; our citizens are
frequently visiting the hallowed resting-places of departed friends; and to say that
1 See 3 L. Law. Rev. 161.
HORSE-RAOCING. : 529
this public street is to be exclusively appropriated to sporting gentlemen, is what will
never be sanctioned by this court, nor by the community. The street is open to all
who may desire to use it; and every one may enjoy this privilege as he pleases, for
the benefit of the air, exercise or pleasure, and can take with him any members of his
family ; nor are these rights to be abridged in any respect, to gratify the tastes of any |
other class of persons who may choose to invade the rights of the public by unlawful
acts, or an improper use of a highway common to all the citizens of the state. No
such principles can be for one moment tolerated in a court of justice, or in a civilized
land.
“Tf the jury should believe that the defendant, while travelling upon the highway at
the time alleged, drove his horse at an improper and immoderate speed, and ran his
carriage against the vehicle of the prosecutor, who was quietly driving along the same
road, he is guilty of an assault and battery. This point has not been controverted by
the defendant’s counsel; but it is contended that the injury was the result of inevita-
ble accident.
“The facts of the case seem to be these: Mr. Kennedy, the prosecutor, was
passing along Broad street, in June last, with his carriage and some members of
his family in it with him, and driving at the usual travelling gait. When near
Girard avenue, he was about to turn down the same; while attempting it, he saw
the defendant approaching in a carriage, with his horse on a fast run; the prose-
cutor instantly endeavored to turn his horse in an opposite direction, but before he
was entirely removed from the place of apparent danger, the defendant’s carriage
came in contract with that of the prosecutor, upset the carriage, threw him and his
wife upon the ground, causing considerable injury to him, and much greater to his
wife.
“Tt is clearly proved, that the defendant had been, for a great distance, trotting
his horse at the top of his speed ; and when within about two hundred yards of the
place where the event occurred, his horse broke into a run, when the defendant struck
him a violent blow with his whip; some of the witnesses say he struck the horse a
number of times; and one of the witnesses said that he tried to hold him up, and the
horse continued his speed until after the injury was effected. After this had been
done, the defendant drove on his course, without returning to see the effect produced
by the conflict, or who had been injured thereby, or whether he had caused the death
of a fellow being or not.
“Tf the jury believe that the defendant was driving his horse at a rapid, immoder-
ate gait, faster than people usually travel, and violently drove against the carriage
of the prosecutor, and thereby inflicting upon him a personal injury, he is guilty of
the offence charged in the indictment. Nor will it vary the case, if, when the horse
had been urged to the top of his speed for some distance, he broke into a run; for the
defendant is responsible for urging his horse to that immoderate gait, and must
answer for the consequences.”’
The jury rendered a verdict of guilty, and the defendant was sentenced to pay a fine
of one hundred dollars and the costs of prosecution.’
1 See Bright 186. 3 Am. L, J. 313, 22 Vt. 213.
[ 530 ]
WHorse-Stealing,
I. Punishment for horse-stealing. III. Public sale of stolen horses not to change
Il. Reward for apprehension and conviction. the property.
d IV. Forms of process, &c.
I. Act 31 Marou 1860. Purd. 515.
Szor. 105, If any person shall be guilty of horse-stealing, or as accessory thereto
before the fact, or of having received or bought any horse, knowing the same to
have been stolen, the person so offending shall be guilty of felony, and shall, on
conviction, be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars, and to
undergo an imprisonment, by separate or solitary confinement, at labor, not exceed-
ing ten years.
If. Act 15 Marcu 1821. Purd. 991.
Szor. 1. Whosoever * * * shall pursue and apprehend any person who shall
have stolen any mare, horse or gelding, within any county of this commonwealth,
on the conviction of the person so apprehended, shall be entitled to the reward
of twenty dollars for apprehending the person who shall have been convicted of
stealing any mare, horse or gelding as aforesaid, and six cents for every mile
necessarily travelled in pursuit of the offender :' Provided, That the reward offered
by this act shall in no wise exclude the person or persons entitled to such reward
from being competent witnesses.
Srcr. 2. It shall be the duty of the court within any county aforesaid, before
which any persov or persons are convicted of the crime of horse-steahing, to inquire
whether any, and if any, who is the person or persons entitled to receive the above
rewards, and if more than one person, then in what proportion the said sum or
sums ought to be paid to them, and to direct the clerk of said court to certify the
same, with the name or names of the claimants, to the commissioners of the county in
which the owner of the horse, mare or gelding resides, who are hereby directed and
enjoined to draw their warrant on the treasurer of said county in favor of the said
claimant or claimants for the amount so certified, all which shall be done free of all
costs and charges to the said claimant or claimants, under the provisions ofthis act.
III. The 7th section of the act 23d September 1780, provides that no sale of any
stolen horse, mare or gelding, by an auctioneer, at public vendue, shall be deemed
a public sale in market overt, so as to change the property thereof?
IV. INFORMATION FOR HORSE-STEALING.
MIFFLIN COUNTY, ss.
Tue information of G. H., of N—— township, in the county of M——, yeoman, taken
on oath before J. R., one of the justices of the peace in and for the said county, the 10th
day of April, 4. p. 1880, who saith, that about two months ago a certain black gelding,
rising five years old, and about fifteen hands high, was stolen out of his pasture in N——
township aforesaid, and that he hath good cause to suspect, and doth suspect, that a certain
A. B., of the same township, laborer, did steal, take and carry away, the said gelding.
Further saith not. G. H.
Taken and subscribed before J. R., Justice of the Peace.
1 The owner of the stolen horse, who pursues within areasonable time thereafter. 42 Leg. Int.
and captures the thief, is entitled to the reward. 276. 43 Ibid. 108. See act 4 April 1889. Purd.
107 Penn. St. 407. 991.
2The claim must be presented to the court 3 Purd. 991. 18m. 511
immediately after the trial, or during the term, or
HOUSE OF REFUGE. 531
WARRANT AGAINST A HORSE-THIEF,
MIFFLIN COUNTY, ss.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To the Constable of the township of N , in the county of Mifflin, greeting:
Wuereas, G. H., of N township, in the county of Mifflin, yeoman, hath this day
made oath before J. R., one of our justices of the peace in and for the said county, that
about two months ago a certain black gelding, rising five years old, and about fifteen
hands high, was stolen out of his pasture in N—— township aforesaid, and that he hath
good cause to suspect, and doth suspect, a certain A. B., of the same township, laborer,
did steal, take and carry away the said gelding. You are, therefore, hereby commanded
to take the said A. B., and bring him before the said J. R., forthwith, to answer the said
charge, and further to be dealt with according to law. Witness the said J. R., at N——
township aforesaid, the tenth day of April, a. p. 1880.
J. R., Justice of the Peace. [szau.]
COMMITMENT OF A HORSE-THIEF.
MIFFLIN COUNTY, ss.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To the Constable of the township of N——,, in the county of Mifilin, and to the keeper
of the common jail of the said county, greeting:
Wuereas, A. B., of N—— township, in the county of Mifflin, laborer, hath been brought
before J. R., Esquire, one of our justices of the peace in and for the said county, by virtue
of bis warrant, charged on oath of G. H., of the same township, yeoman, with having
stolen and carried away from the pasture of the said G. H., in N—— township aforesaid,
a certain black gelding, rising five years old, and about fifteen hands high. These are,
therefore, to command you, the said constable, to convey the said A. B. to the common
jail of the said county forthwith, and deliver him to the keeper thereof, who is hereby
enjoined to receive the said A. B, and keep him in safe custody until he be delivered by
due course of law. Witness the said J. R., at N—— township aforesaid, the 10th day of
April, a. p. 1880. J.R., Justice of the Peace. [srat.]
Mouse of Refuge,
I. Commitments to the house of refuge of Phila- ern Pennsylvania.
delphia. III. Judicial decisions.
II. Commitments to the house of refuge of West- IV. Form of a commitment to the house of refuge.
I. Act 10 Aprit 1835. Purd. 998.
Szor. 1. It shall be lawful for the managers of the house of refuge, at their
discretion, to receive into their care and guardianship infants, males under the age
of twenty-one years, and females under the age of eighteen years, committed to
their custody in either of the following modes, viz.: (1.) Infants committed by
an alderman or justice of the peace, on the complaint and due proof made to him
by the parent, guardian or next friend of such infant, that, by reason of incorrigible
or vicious conduct, such infant has rendered his or her contro! beyond the power of
such parent, guardian or next friend, and made it manifestly requisite that, from
regard for the morals and future welfare of such infant, he or she should be placed
under the guardianship of the managers of the house of refuge: (2.) Infants
committed by the authority aforesaid, where complaint and due proof have been
made that such infant is a proper subject for the guardianship of the managers of
the house of refuge, in consequence of vagrancy or of incorrigible or vicious con-
duct, and that trom the moral depravity or otherwise of the parent or next friend,
in whose custody such infant may be, such parent or next friend is incapable or
unwilling to exercise the proper care and discipline over such incorrigible or vicious
infants: (3.) Infants committed by the courts of this commonwealth, in the
mode provided in the act to which this is a supplement.
Seor. 2. It shall be the duty of any alderman or justice aforesaid, committing
a vagrant or incorrigible or vicious infant as aforesaid, in addition to the adjudica-
532 HOUSE OF REFUGE.
tion required by the 1st section of this act, to annex to his commitment the names
and residence of the different witnesses examined before him, and the substance
of the testimony given by them respectively, on which the said adjudication was
founded.
Sxcr. 3. It shall be the duty of the president and legal associates of the com-
non pleas of Philadelphia county, * * * alternately, in such manner as may be
arranged between them at a joint meeting for that purpose, from time to time
held, to visit the house of refuge at least once in two weeks, or oftener, if to the
said judges it shall seem requisite; and it shall be the duty of the judge kK
so visiting the house of refuge, carefully to examine into all the commitments
to the said house of refuge made by the aldermen, justices or guardians of the
poor aforesaid, that have not previously been adjudged upon by one of the said
judges * * in the manner hereinafter directed, which commitments it shall be the
duty of the managers of the house of refuge, truly and correctly to lay before such
judge * * and on such examination, such judge * * shall have produced before
him, by the managers aforesaid, their superintendent or agent, the infant or infants
described in such commitment, and the testimony upon which he or she shall have
been adjudged a fit subject for the guardianship of said managers, or on which he
or she shall be claimed to be held as such, and if, after examining the infant and
such testimony, the said judge * * shall be of opinion that, according to the
laws of this commonwealth, regulating the control of infants, a case has been
established which, in his opinion, would, according to law, authorize the transfer
of the parental authority over such infant to the managers of the house of refuge,
then, and in that case, it shall be the duty of the said judge * * to indorse an
order on the commitment of the justice or alderman, or guardians of the poor,
directing the infant to be continued under the guardianship of the managers of the
house of refuge, after which it shall be lawful for said managers to exercise over
all such infants the powers and authorities given them by the act to which this is
asupplement. But if the said judge * * shall be of opinion that such case has
not been made out, he shall order such infant to be forthwith discharged, which
order shall be obeyed by the managers, under the pains and penalties provided
by law against wrongful imprisonment: Provided, That it shall be the duty of
said judge * * at the request of such infant, or any person in his behalf, to
transfer such hearing to the court-house of the court of which he is a member,
in order that the infant may have the benefit of counsel, and of compulsory
process to obtain witnesses required in his or her behalf, which such judge * *
is hereby authorized to award, as fully and amply as any judge or court could do
on the hearing of a writ of habeas corpus: And provided also, That nothing in this
act contained shall be construed to interfere with the provisions of an act entitled,
“an act for the better securing of personal liberty and preventing unlawful impris-
onment,” passed on the 18th day of February 1785, commonly called the habeas
corpus act.)
The act of 23d March 1826 provides, that the managers shall, at their discretion,
receive into the said house of refuge such children who shall be duly convicted of
criminal offences, as may be, in the judgment of the court of oyer and terminer or
of the court of quarter sessions of the county of Philadelphia, deemed proper
objects.’
By the act 10th January 1867, they shall also receive such children who may be
convicted, in any court of quarter sessions out of the city of Philadelphia, of any
misdemeanor or criminal offence, as may be, in the judgment of the said courts
deemed proper objects for the house of refuge ®
The power of the managers over such children extends to their arrival at the age
of twenty-one years ; except in the case of females who, at the time of their com-
mitment, are under the age of sixteen, in which case, their charge over them ceases
at the age of eighteen years.‘
The managers are invested with power to place the children committed to their
care, at such employment, and to cause them to be instructed in such branches of
useful knowledge, as may be suitable to their years and capacities ; and with their
consent may bind them out as apprentices, to learn such proper trades and employ-
1 Purd. 999. * Thid. 999.
2 Thid. 998.
HOUSE OF REFUGE. 588
ments as in their judgment will be most conducive to their reformation and
amendment, and will tend to the future benefit and advantage of such children.
II, Act 22 Aprin 1850. Purd.1001.
Szor. 15. It shall be lawful for the board of managers of said house of refuge
(of Western Pennsylvania), at their discretion, to receive into their care and
guardianship infants, males under the age of twenty-one years, and females under
the age of twenty-one years, committed to their custody, in either of the following
modes, to wit:
1. Infants committed by an alderman or justice of the peace on the complaint,
and due proof made thereof, by the parent, guardian or next friend of such infant,
that by reason of incorrigible or vicious conduct, such infant has rendered his or
her control beyond the power of such parent, guardian or next friend, and made it
manifestly requisite that from regard to the morals and future welfare of such
infant, he or she should be placed under the guardianship of the managers of the
said house of refuge.
2. Infants committed by the authority aforesaid, where complaint and due proof
have been made that such infant is a proper subject for the guardianship of the
managers of the said house of refuge, in consequence of vagrancy, or of incorrigible
or vicious conduct, and that from the moral depravity or otherwise of the parent or
guardian, or next friend, in whose custody such infant may be, such parent, guardian
or next friend is incapable or unwilling to exercise the proper care and discipline
over such incorrigible or vicious infant.
3. Infants who shall be taken or committed as vagrants or upon any criminal
charge, or duly convicted of criminal offences, as may, in the judgment of the court
of oyer and terminer, or of the court of quarter sessions of the peace of any county
within the western district 2 and the said managers shall have power to place the
said children committed to their care, during their minority, at such employment,
and cause them to be instructed in such branches of useful knowledge as may be
suitable to their years and capacities ; and they shall have power, at their discretion,
to bind out the said children, with their consent, as apprentices during their minority,
to such persons and at such places, to learn such proper trades and employments as
in their judgment will be most conducive to the reformation and amendment, and
will tend to the future benefit and advantage of such children.
Secr. 16. It shall be the duty of any alderman or justice aforesaid, committing
a vagrant, or incorrigible or vicious infant as aforesaid, in addition to the adjudica-
tion required by the 6th section of this act, to annex to his commitment the names
and residences of the different witnesses examined before him, and the substance
of the testimony given by them respectively, on which the said adjudication was
founded.
Sror. 17. It shall be the duty of the judges of the courts of common pleas of
Allegheny county, alternately,? in such manner as may be arranged between them
ata joint meeting for that purpose, from time to time held, to visit the said house
of refuge at least once in two weeks, or oftener if to said judges it shall seem
requisite ; and it shall be the duty of the judge so visiting the house of refuge,
earefully to examine into all the commitments to the said house of refuge, made by
the aldermen or justices aforesaid, that have not previously been adjudged upon
by one of the said judges in the manner hereinafter directed, which commitments
it shall be the duty of the managers truly and correctly to lay before such judge ;
and on such examination such judge shall have produced before him by the man-
agers aforesaid, their superintendent or agent, the infant or infants described in
such commitment, and the testimony upon which he or she shall have been ad-
judged a fit subject for the guardianship of the said managers, or on which he or
she shall be claimed to be held as such; and if after examining the infant and
such testimony the said judge shall be of opinion that, according to the laws of
this commonwealth regulating the control of infants, a case has been established
1 Purd, 998, 3 See act 14 April 1868, imposing these.duties
2 By act 11 April 1862, they may also receive on the judges of Allegheny county, exclusively.
infants convicted in the federal courts for the Pamph. 1099. And see 4 Brewst. 112.
western district. Purd. 1003.
534 HOUSE OF REFUGE.
which, in his opinion, would, according to law, authorize the transfer of the parental
authority over such infant, to the managers of the said house of refuge, then and
in that case it shall be the duty of the said judge to indorse an order on the com-
mitment of the alderman oy justice, or direct the infant to be continued under the
guardianship of the said wanagers, after which it shall be lawful for the said
managers to exercise over all such infants the powers and authorities given them
by this act; but if the said judge shall be of opinion that such case bas not been
made out, he shall order such infant to be forthwith discharged, which order shall
be obeyed by the managers, under the pains and penalties provided by law against
wrongful imprisonment: Provided, That it shall be the duty of said judge, at the
request of such infant, or any person on his or her behalf, to transfer such hearing
to the court-house of the court of which he is a member, in order that the infant
may have the benefit of counsel and cumpulsory process to obtain witnesses in his
or her behalf, which sach judge is authorized to award as fully and amply as any
judge or court could do on the hearing of a writ of habeas corpus: And provided
also, That nothing in this act shall be construed to interfere with the provisions
of an act for the better securing the personal liberty, and preventing unlawful im-
prisonment, passed on the 18th day of February 1785.
III. The house of refuge is not a prison, but a school, its object is reformation,
by training its inmates to industry, by imbuing their minds with principles of
morality and religion, by furnishing them with means to earn a living, and, above
all, by separating them from the corrupting influence of improper associates.’
The master of an apprentice is not a next friend, on whose complaint the minor
may be committed to the house of refuge. A father cannot transfer the custody
of the person of his child to the managers of the house of refuge, unless such child
be adjudged a proper subject for the house of refuge by due course of law. Where
a child under fourteen years of age is adjudged a vagrant, the circumstances of the
case ought to be urgent, unequivocal and decisive.®
An infant committed to the house of refuge by a justice, on a charge of felony,
is entitled to be discharged on giving bail to answer for his appearance, and demand-
ing a jury trial.‘ But unless the record shows that the commitment was for the
commission of a felony, the court will refuse to discharge; the parents appearing to
be unable to restrain the infant from the commission of criminal offences.®
The adjudication of the justice is in no respect conclusive, and the whole subject
is open on the hearing of a writ of Aabeas corpus. The judges of Philadelphia
have power to review a commitment from another county.’ But after the commit-
ment has been received and approved by one of the judges, there is no discretionary
power in the court to discharge the minor on habeas corpus.®
The act 4th June 1879 authorizes the managers of the houses of refuge, who have
placed out their wards as apprentices, or given them up to their friends, to reclaim
such minors, where the agreements made on their behalf have been violated, or they
have been improperly treated.®
IV. CoMMITMENT TO THE HOUSE OF REFUGE.
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ss.
Wuersas, complaint and due proof have this day been made before me, the subscriber,
a magistrate of the said city, by A. B., the father of E. B., an infant under the age of
[sixteen] years, that the said infant, by reason of vicious conduct, has rendered his control
beyond the power of the said complainant, and made it manifestly requisite that, from
regard to the morals and future welfare of the said infant, he should be placed under the
guardianship of the managers of the house of refuge, I do therefore, in pursuance of
the actof assembly in such case made and provided, commit the said infant to the custody
of the suid managers, and certify to the said managers, that the said infant is, in my
opinion, a proper subject for the said house of refuge.
Witness my hand and seal, this Sth day of June, a. p. 1880.
J. B., Magistrate. [sEat.]
11 Whart. 11. 6 1 Ash. 248,
2 Vaux 146. 7 8 Phila. 614.
8 1 Ash. 248, . '2 W.N.C. 691.
4 Kelly’s Case, Q. 8. Phila. 22 June 1853. 9 Purd. 1001.
5 Rebhun’s Case, Q. 8. Phila. 6 August 1853,
ICE. 535
The following are the names and residence of the different witnesses examined, and
the substance of the testimony given by them respectively on which the said adjudication
was founded, to wit: |
G. §., of the city of Philadelphia, laborer, being duly sworn, stated in substance —~.
P. H., of the said city, cordwainer, being duly affirmed, stated in substance .
J. B., Magistrate.
Itee.
Act 8 May 1876. Purd. 1010.
Sgor. 1. Any person or persons who shall wilfully throw, place or cast upon the
ice forming, formed or being upon any pond, stream, river, creek or canal in this
commonwealth, owned or leased in whole or in part for the production of ice for
sale, any timber, stone, earth or other substance, or enter upon, in anywise injure
or defile the ice thereon forming, formed or being, such person or persons shall be
deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and shall and may, upon the information of any
such owner, lessee, his agent or attorney, on conviction thereof before any alder-
man or justice of the peace in the county where the offence is committed, be fined
in a sum not less than five dollars or more than fifty dollars, with costs of suit ;
the fines to go to the school fund of the district in which the offence was com-
mitted ; and in default of payment of said fine, with costs of the suit, the party
convicted may and shall, by said alderman or justice of the peace, be committed
to the jail of the said county, for not less than twenty nor more than sixty days,
there to remain until discharged by due course of law: Provided, That in all cases
the person or persons complained against, may appeal from the decision of said
alderman or magistrate, to the court of quarter sessions of said county, upon
entering bail as in all other misdemeanors, by recognisance, in the usual manner,
for his appearance at said court, and said alderman or magistrate shall transmit
said recognisance forthwith to the district-attorney of said county; and thereupon
it shall be the duty of the district-attorney of said county to prepare a bill of
indictment for said offence against said person or persons, and send the same
before the grand jury of the said court, and all further proceedings therein shall
be in like manner as is now directed by law in other cases of misdemeanor: And
itis further provided, That in case of conviction of such person or persons in said
court, such person or persons shall be sentenced to pay a fine of not less than ten
dollars, nor more than one hundred dollars
[ 536 J
Jincest,
i. Provisions of the Penal Code. II. Judicial decisions.
J. Aor 31 Maron 1860. Purd. 512.
Sxor. 39. If any person shall commit incestuous fornication or adultery, or inter-
marry within the degrees of consanguinity or affinity, according to the following
table (established by law), he or she shall, on conviction, be sentenced to pay a fine
not exceeding five hundred dollars, and to undergo an imprisonment, by separate or
solitary confinement at labor, not exceeding three years; and all such marriages are
hereby declared void.
The table of degrees of consanguinity and affinity is as follows:
Degrees of Consanguinity.
A man may not marry his mother.
Do. . . . do. . . father’s sister.
Do. . . . do. . . mother’s sister.
Do. . . . do. . . sister.
Do. . . . do. . . daughter.
Do. . . . do. the daughter of his son or daughter.
A woman may not marry her father.
Do. . . . do. . . . father’s brother.
Do. . . . do. . . . mother’s brother.
Do . . . do. . . . brother.
Do. . . . do. . . son.
Do. . . . do. . . the son of her son or daughter.
Degrees of Affinity.
A man may not marry his father’s wife.
Do. . . . do. . . son’s wife.
Do. . . . do. . . son’s daughter.
Do. . . do. . . wife’s daughter.
Do. . . . do. . the daughter of his wife’s son or daughter.
A woman may not marry her mother’s husband.
Do . . . do . . . daughter’s husband.
Do . . . do. . husband’s son.
Do. . . . do. . . the son of her husband’s son or daughter.
II. Illicit intercourse with one recognised as a daughter, and with whose mother
the defendant lived in reputed wedlock, is sufficient to convict.’ Illicit intercourse
with a natural daughter, is incest within the statute? To constitute the crime of
incest, the intercourse must be by mutual consent; if accomplished by force, it is
zape.®
Under an indictment for incest, evidence of previous familiarities is admissible
and relevant, as they constitute a necessary part of the principal transaction.‘
An indictment for incest with a daughter, must aver that the defendant had
imtercourse with his daughter ‘‘knowing her to be such.”5 An averment that
the defendant had intercourse with P. B., the said P. B. then and there being the
daughter of the defendant, is a sufficient allegation of the relationship of the parties.
On an indictment for incest, an admission of the relationship, made by the
defendant, is competent evidence.”
The validity of an incestuous marriage cannot be questioned after the death of
the parties.6 And it seems, that the issue of such incestuous connection may
inherit from each other, under our statute.®
1 4 Clark 14. 6 17 Ill. 426,
2 30 Ala. 521. 7 5 Mich. 305.
8 1 Park. 314. 8 44 Penn. St. 309. r
4 5 Mich. 305. See 4 Tex. 128. 9 14 Pet. 178, Purd. 1072.
5 2 Carter 439.
| 587 ]
Indictment,
WHATEVER amounts to a public wrong, may be made the subject of indictment ;
as the poisoning of chickens, cheating with false dice, fraudulently tearing a
promissory note, breaking windows with stones, though there be not a sufficient
number of persons to constitute a riot, the embezzlement of public moneys, killing
a horse, &c.! Or offering to bribe, though the bribe is not accepted.?
Whatever is productive of a disturbance of the public peace, or of malicious
injury to the property of another; or of nuisance or scandal.to the community ; or
partakes of the character of personal lewdness; or tends or incites to the commis-
sion of any specific crimes ; is indictable as a misdemeanor at common law.
Disobedience to an act of assempiy is an indictable offence at common law.* So
is an attempt to commit a misdemeanor.’ But mere solicitation 1s not an attempt
to commit the offence.®
A confederacy to assist a female infant to escape from her father’s control, with
a view to marry her against his will, is indictable as a conspiracy at the common
law.’ So is the exhibition of an obscene picture.- And the collection of a crowd
in the public streets, and addressing them in words contrary to decency and good
morals.® Election frauds, the punishment of which is not prescribed by statute,
are indictable at common law.”
Supervisors are indictable for neglecting or refusing to open or repair a highway.™
Neglecting to keep a highway in repair is an indictable offence, in the person on
whom the duty is imposed by law or contract. So, an indictment will lie against a
railroad company, for a public nuisance, such as the obstruction of a turnpike road,
to the serious inconvenience of travel upon the same.™
It is sufficient in indictments [warrants, commitments or docket-entries], that the
charge be stated with so much certainty that the defendant may know what he is
called to answer, and that the court may know how to render the proper judgment
thereon. Over-nice exceptions are not to be encouraged, especially in cases which
do not touch the life of the defendant.*
1 1 Dall. 338. 9 19 Penn. St. 412.
2 Ibid. 384. 10 97 Ibid. 397.
8 Whart. Cr. L. 2 3. 11 7 Ibid. 275. 78 Ibid 161.
4138S. &R. 429. 1 Penn. St, 224, 12 44 Ibid. 197.
5 10 Phila, 211. 18 90 Ibid. 300. 12 W. N.C. 280. And see 69
6 54 Penn. St. 209. 95 Ibid. 318. Penn. St. 367.
75 W.&S. 461. 4 1 Chit. Cr. L. 170, 221.
8258. GR. 91.
[ 538 J
Iinfants,
[See APPRENTICES. FACTORIES. ]
I. Definition of infancy, III. Rights and liabilities of infants.
II. Protection of infants.
I. INFANT, a person under ¢wenty-one years of age.’ A person is of full age, the
day before the twenty-first anniversary of his birthday.’ Thus, if a man be born
at any hour on the Ist day of January 1860, he is of age to do any legal act on the
morning of the 31st of December 1881, though he may not have lived twenty-one
years by nearly forty-eight hours, because the law does not regard the fraction of a
day.’
II. Act 11 June 1879. Purd. 1015, 1016, 101&
Secor. 1. Any person whatsoever who shall cruelly ill-treat, abuse or inflict unne-
cessary cruel punishment upon any infant or minor child, and any person having
the care, custody or control of any minor child, who shall wilfully abandon or
neglect the same, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof,
before any justice of the peace, magistrate or court of record, shall be fined by such
justice, magistrate or court of record, not less than ten dollars nor more than fifty
dollars for each offence.
Sxcr. 2. Any person having the care, custody or control of any minor child under
the age of fifteen years, who shall in any manner sell, apprentice, give away or
otherwise dispose of such child, and any person who shall take, receive or employ
such child for the vocation or occupation of rope or wire-walking, or as an acrobat,
gymnast, contortionist or rider, and any person who, having the care, custody or
zontrol of any minor child whatsoever, shall sell, apprentice, give away, or other-
wise dispose of such child, or who shall take, receive or employ such child, for any
obscene, indecent or illegal exhibition or vocation, or any vocation injurious to the
health or dangerous to the life or limb of such child engaged therein, or for the pur-
pose of prostitution, and any person who shall retain, harbor or employ any minor
child in or about any assignation house or brothel, or in any place where any obscene,
indecent or illegal exhibition takes place, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor,-and
upon conviction thereof, before any justice of the peace, magistrate or court of
record, shall be fined not less than fifty dollars nor more than one hundred dollars
for each offence.
Sxct. 8. Any person having the care, custody or control, lawful or unlawful, for
(of) any minor child under the age of eighteen years, who shall use such minor or
apprentice, give away, let out, hire or otherwise dispose of such minor, to any per-
son, for the purpose of singing, playing on musical instruments, begging, or for any
mendicant business whatsoever, in the streets, roads or other highways of this com-
monwealth, and whosoever shall take, receive, hire, employ, use or have in custody,
any such minor, for the vocation, occupation, calling, service or purpose of singing,
playing upon musical instruments or begging, upon the streets, roads or other high-
ways of the commonwealth, or for any mendicant business whatever, shall be guilty
of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof in the manner provided in the first
section of this act, shall be fined uot less than fifty dollars nor more than one
hundred dollars.
Sect. 4. Any person having the care, custody or control of any minor child under
the age of fifteen years, who shall in any manner sell, apprentice, give away or per-
mit such child to sing, dance, act, or in any manner exhibit, in any dance-houso
whatever, or in any concert-saloon, theatre or place of entertainment, where wines
or spirituous or malt liquors are sold or given away, or with which any place for
the sale of wines or spirituous or malt liquors is directly or indirectly connected, by
1 Co. Litt. 171. ; * 1 Bouv. Inst. 138-9. 3 Harring. 557. 4
21 Bi. Com. 462. 1 Kulp 157. Dana 507.
INFANTS. 539
any passage-way or entrance, and any proprietor of any dance-house whatever, or any
such concert-saloon, theatre or place of entertainment, so employing any such child,
shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof in the manner pro-
vided in the first section of this act, shall be fined not less than fifty dollars nor more
than one hundred dollars for each offence.
Sect. 5. Any person who shall take, receive, hire or employ any child under
twelve years of age, in any under-ground work or mine, or like place whatsoever,
shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof in the manner pro-
vided in the first section of this act, shall be fined not less than ten dollars nor
more than fifty dollars. .
Secr. 6. Whenever any person shall, before a magistrate or justice of the peace,
make oath or affirmation that the affiant believes that this act has been or is being
violated in any place or house, such justice or magistrate shall forthwith issue a
warrant to a constable or other authorized officer, to enter such place or house and
investigate the same; and such person may arrest or cause to be arrested all
offenders, and bring them before any justice, magistrate or court of record for a
hearing of the case ; and it shall be the duty of all constables and policemen to
aid in bringing all such offenders before said authorities for a hearing.
Secr. 7. Whenever any person having the custody or control of any minor, shall
be convicted of a violation of any of the provisions of this act, it shall be lawful
for any person to apply to the orphans’ court of the county wherein the offence has
been committed, for the appointment of a proper guardian for the person of such
minor; and the said court may, in its discretion, make such appointment, having
due regard in the selection of a guardian to the religious persuasion of the parent
or former guardian, or it may place such chiid in an asylum or home for children,
with the powers of a guardian of the person, as may be most expedient: Provided,
however, That the children of Roman Catholic parents shall be placed in asylums
under the control and care of that denomination. And the said court may order
the parent to pay such a reasonable sum towards the maintenance of such child,
and at such times and in such amounts, as the said court may see fit; and such
courts may, at any subsequent time, upon being satisfied that the parent has become
a fit person to resume the custody of said minor, and upon reasonable security, to
be fixed by the court, being given for the faithful observance of the provisions of
this act, remand such minor to the custody of such parent; subject, nevertheless,
to the obligation of any indentures or legal engagements already entered into on
behalf of said minor by his or her guardian.
Sxor. 8. Any duly organized or incorporated humane society, having for one of
its objects the protection of children from cruelty, may offer any agents or officers
employed by them to the mayor of any city of the first, second, third, fourth or
fifth class, for the purpose of being commissioned to act as police. officers through
the limits of said city, for the purpose of arresting all the offenders of this act, or
any of the provisions thereof; whereupon the mayor in such city shall, if such
persons are proper and discreet persons, commission them to act as such police
officers, with all the rights and powers appertaining thereto; but no such city shall
be liable in any way for the salary or wages of ‘such officers, or for any expense
whatever in relation thereto, except for the detention of prisoners. And in any
district or township not incorporated, such humane society may offer similarly quali-
fied persons to the court of common pleas of the county, whereupon such court or
any judge thereof shall, if they be fit persons, commission such persons to act as
constables, with power to arrest all offenders against this act or any provisions
thereof; but no township, borough or county, shall in anywise (be) liable for the
salary or wages of any such officer, or for any expense in relation thereto, except
for the detention of prisoners. All persons thus qualified under this section shall
be deemed to be constables and authorized officers, within the meaning of section
six of this act; and the keepers of jails, or lock-ups, or station houses, in any of
said counties, ate required to receive all persons arrested by such policemen or
constables. :
Sgcr. 9. Whenever any person having the care, custody or control of any minor
child, shall be convicted of an assault, or an assault and battery, upon such child, or
of any violation of the provisions of this act, it sball be lawful for the justice of the
peace, magistrate, or court before whom such conviction has taken place, or where
540 INFANTS.
the parents or proper guardian of any child cannot be found, it shall be tawful for
any magistrate or court, to commit such child to the care and custody of any duly
authorized or incorporated humane society, having for one of its objects the pro-
tection of children from cruelty ; and such society shall thereupon have all the
rights of a guardian of the person of such child; but such society may at any time
apply to the orphans’ court of the proper county for the appointment of a guardian
of the person, or the commitment of such child to an asylum or home for children,
as provided in the seventh section of this act. :
Sxcr..10. Whenever it shall be made to appear to the satisfaction of the court
of common pleas of any county, that any minor child has been deserted by its
parents or surviving parent, and that it has no legal guardian, it shall be lawful for
any person desirous of adopting the said child, to adopt the same, in the manner
now provided by law in the case of the death of the parents.’
Sxcr. 11. In default of payment of the fine or penalty imposed under any of the
‘sections of this act, together with the costs of the proceedings, then said justice of
the peace, magistrate or court of record, shall commit said offender to the county
prison, there to remain for not less than twenty nor more than ninety days, or
until discharged by due course of law: Provided, That when the fine imposed
exceeds the sum of ten dollars, the party complained against may appeal from the
decision of said justice of the peace or magistrate to the court of quarter sessions,
upon his entering bail in the nature of a recognisance, in the usual manner, for his
appearance at said court, when the offence shall he prosecuted in the same manner
as is now directed by law in other cases of misdemeanor. If, in lieu of deciding
the cause, such justice of the peace or magistrate shall bind over or commit such
person to appear at the court of quarter sessions, or if such person shall appear as
aforesaid, or upon such binding over or commitment, appear before the said court,
and be there convicted of such misdemeanor, he shall be sentenced to pay a fine
not exceeding two hundred dollars, payable as aforesaid, or undergo an imprison-
ment not exceeding one year, or both, at the discretion of the court.
Secr. 12. Whenever the parents or proper guardian of any infant unable to sup-
port itself, have been convicted of any of the offences enumerated in this act, or are
dead or cannot be found, and there is no other person legally responsible for the
maintenance and support of such child, willing to assume such support, or to be
found within the county, any magistrate or court of record of the county in which
such child may be found, may commit such child to the care and custody of the
guardians of the poor of the said county; but nothing herein contained shall
exempt any person from the duty of maintaining and supporting such child, as
now imposed by law.
Act 13 June 1883. Purd. 1020.
Szcr. 1. It shall not be lawful for the overseers or guardians or directors of the
poor in the several counties, cities, boroughs and townships of this commonwealth,
to receive into, or retain in, any almshouse or poor-house, any child between two
and sixteen years of age, for a longer time than sixty days; unless such child be
an unteachable idiot, an epileptic or a paralytic, or otherwise so disabled or deformed
as to render it incapable of labor or service.
Secor. 2. It shall be the duty of said overseers or other persons having charge of
the poor, to place all pauper children who are in their charge, and who are over two
years of age (with the exception named in the first section of this act), in some
respectable family in this state, or in some educational institution or home for
children; and one of the said officers shall visit such children, in person or by
agent, not less than once every six months, and make all needful inquiries as to
their treatment and welfare, and shall report thereon to the board of overseers or
other officers charged with the care of such children.
Szor. 3. It shall be lawful for any county, or for two or more counties in this
commonwealth acting together, to establish and maintain an industrial home for the
care and training of children; but such institution or home shall be remote from
any almshouse or poor-house, and entirely disconnected from the same, and under
separate management from the keeper of the poor-house
1 Purd. 82.
INFANTS. 541
Act 28 May 1885. Pamph. 525.
Szor. 1. Any person who takes a female child under the age of sixteen years
for the purpose of prostitution or sexual intercourse, or, without the consent of her
father, mother, guardian or other person having legal custody of her person, for the
purpose of marriage, or who inveigles or entices any such minor female child into
a house of ill-fame, or of assignation, or elsewhere, for the purpose of prostitution
or sexual intercourse, shall, in every such case, be guilty of a misdemeanor, and
upon conviction thereof, shall be sentenced to imprisonment at separate or solitary
confinement, at labor, for not more than five years, or pay a fine not exceeding one
thousand dollars, or both, at the discretion of the court.
Szor. 2. Any person, other than an institution duly incorporated for the purpose,
who shall engage in the business of receiving, boarding or keeping infant children,
under the age of three years, for hire or reward, who shall receive or take for such
purpose more than two such children, without legal commitment, or without having
first obtained a licence in writing so to do from the mayor of the town or a justice
of the peace or magistrate of the locality wherein such child is to be received,
boarded or kept, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof,
shall be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding one hundred dollars.?
Sect. 3. It shall and may be lawful for the mayor of any city or town, or any
justice of the peace or magistrate of the locality, within which any child is to be
received, boarded or kept as specified in section two, at his discretion, to issue a
licence to any person applying therefor for the purposes specified in section two of
this act, upon the payment of a fee of one dollar for the use of the county, which
licence shall be revocable at all times by the court of quarter sessions or any judge
thereof, upon cause shown. It shall be lawful for any member or officer of the state
board of charities, or the board of health in the locality wherein such licence is
issued, or any duly authorized officer of any incorporated society for the protection
of children from cruelty, at all reasonable times, to enter and inspect the premises
wherein any such children are boarded, received or kept.
Szot. 4. Any proprietor or any person in charge of any dance-house, concert
saloon, theatre, museum, or similar places of amusement, where wines or spirituous
or malt liquors are sold or given away, or any place of entertainment injurious to
health or morals, who admits or permits to remain therein any minor under the age
of eighteen years, unless accompanied by his or her parent or guardian, shall be
guilty of a misdemeanor, and, on conviction thereof, shall be punished by a fine not
exceeding two hundred dollars.’
III. Within the age of seven years, an infant cannot be the subject of a criminal
prosecution. At fourteen years of age an infant is dol capa, able to discriminate
between good and evil, and subject to punishment for crime; under fourteen, an
infant is considered, prima facie, unacquainted with guilt, and incapable of crime.
But if an infant, between the ages of seven and fourteen years, exhibits unequivocal
malice, and an obvious knowledge of the impropriety of the act committed, he may
be convicted even capitally ¢
Infants being supposed destitute of sufficient understanding to contract, the law
protects their weakness, so far as to allow them to avoid every injurious contract ;
but they are bound by all reasonable contracts for maintenance and education, and
by acts which they are legally bound to perform’
An infant is liable for necessary victuals, apparel, physic and surgical attendance,
sehooling and instruction, for a fine assessed on him, on his admission to a copyhold
estate. So he is liable for necessaries supplied to his wife or child. But he is not
liable, as for necessaries in respect of goods bought to sell again, although he keeps
an open public shop, for he has not discretion to carry on business; or for money
supplied to buy necessaries with, unless it be actually so expended.
Infants are only capable of making contracts for necessaries ; or of doing those
things voluntarily which, by law, they might or could be compelled to perform.’
1See act 19 May 1887. Purd. 535. 55 Mass. 78.
2 Purd. 1014. 6 2 Stark. 726.
8 Thid. 1013. 72 P. & W. 333. But if he falsely affirm him~
41 Ash. 248. Whart. Cr. L. 258. Lewis’ Cr. self of full age, he may be liable in an action
L, 599, for deceit. 10 Phila. 618.
542 INFANTS.
An infant may, in some cases, bind himself for necessaries, but he cannot do so
when he has got a guardian or parent to supply his wants." An infant is bound by
a contract for necessaries, and for carrying on the business in which he is employed,
by the consent of his guardians.? An infant may bind himself for necessaries pur-
chased with the consent of his guardian, expressed or implied, but not against his
consent?
It is incumbent on a tradesman, before he trusts an infant with what may appear
to be necessaries, to inquire whether he is provided by his friends.* Whether
articles furnished by a tradesman to an infant are necessaries or not, is a question
of fact for the jury, regard being had to his condition in life, &c. The tradesman
is not bound to inquire whether, or to what extent, the infant is supplied with the
like articles from other sources.®
An infant entering into partnership with other persons, is not responsible for the
debts contracted during his infancy.® An infant may, by law, be a partner, and
he will be entitled to all the benefits resulting from the partnership, although he
will not be liable for the losses, if he choose to avail himself of his minority." Where
a banking trade was carried on in the name of father and gon, in whose joint names
the accounts with customers were headed in the banking books, the father could
not sue alone for the balance of an account overdrawn by a customer, without giving
distinct proof that the son [though proved to be a minor] had no property in the
banking fund, or share in the business, as a partner.®
A bare acknowledgment or part payment, after age [after the infant shall have
attained the age of twenty-one], will not be sufficient; there must be an express
promise.;? and such promise must be voluntary."
A note given by an infant, becomes good by a promise to pay it, made after the
maker of the note came of age ;" so in case of a bond. A promise, after attaining
majority, to pay a debt contracted during infancy, “as fast as he got able,’’ will not
support an action, without proof of ability to pay. A promise, in affirmance of an
infant’s contract, must be made to the party in interest, or his agent ; declarations
to strangers are unavailing.”
I apprehend that ¢rover will not lie against an infant for goods sold to him, either
with or without a knowledge of his infancy ; certainly not, when the fact of infancy
is known to the vendor. Where an infant hired from the plaintiff a horse and gig,
to go to G , but instead of going to that place, went to 0 , in an opposite
direction, and by sévere usage the horse was killed; it was held, that his infancy
was a bar to an action for damages. If the contract of hiring came within the
exception of necessaries, as might be, where a horse was hired to visit a sick parent,
&c., then the infant would be liable for the consequences.
An infant may enforce his own contracts, although they cannot be enforced
against him. And if an infant engage in wagering stock transactions, by way of
margins, he may, on coming of age, recover back the margins lost.
A warrant of attorney to confess judgment given by an infant, is absolutely
void.!6
If the infancy of the plaintiff be pleaded in abatement, the court [or the justice]
may allow him to amend by inserting on the writ [summons or docket], that he
sues by A., his next friend.”
Act 10 May 1881. Purd. 1019.
Sor. 1. Any person, under the age of twenty-one years, who shall knowingly
and falsely represent himself to be twenty-one years of age to any licensed inn.
14 W. 80. 1 2 Root 477.
2 7 Thid. 287. 12 32 Penn. St. 509.
8 Thid. 344. 1383 OR. 354.
4 Peake N. P. 229. 6 W. & S. 80. 14 Thid. 351, 353. But an infant, under the age
5 6W.&S. 80. 51 Penn. St. 80. of seven years, is liable in a civil action, for a
67S. &R. 54, ersonal tort. 31 Leg. Int. 370. And see 100
7 Gow on Part 235. He may transfer title to Penn. St. 149.
a note by the firm indorsement. 1 Penn. St. 497. 1 97 Penn. St. 202.
8 14 Hast 210. 16 22 Ibid. 337,
5 2 Esp. 268. 17 Coxe 416.
10 6 Ibid. 102.
INFORMERS. 543
keeper, restaurant-keeper or other person, for the purpose of procuring, or having
furnished to him, by sale, gift or otherwise, any intoxicating liquors, shall be guilty
of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof in any court of quarter sessions
shall be sentenced to pay a fine of not more than twenty dollars, or undergo an
imprisonment in the county jail for a period not exceeding thirty days.
Szot. 2. Any person who shall knowingly, wilfully and falsely represent to any
licensed innkeeper, restaurant-keeper or other person, any minor to be of full age,
for the purpose of inducing any such licensed innkeeper, restaurant-keeper or other
person, to sell or furnish any intoxicating liquors to said minor, shall be guilty of a
misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall be sentenced to pay a fine of not
more than twenty dollars, or undergo an imprisonment in the county jail for a period
not exceeding thirty days, both or either, at the discretion of the court.
The act 15 May 1874? punishes the crime of trafficking in children. The act 31
March 1860! provides for punishing the crime of enticing a child from its parents,
and the act 25 February 1875? punishes kidnapping with intent to extort money.
The act 11 June 1879? provides that children shall not be used as mendicants nor em-
ployed in dance-houses, concert-saloons, theatres or places of entertainment where
wines or spirituous or malt liquors are sold or given away, nor as acrobats or at rope
or wire walking or as gymnasts, contortionists or riders, or in any assignation house or
brothel. The act 24 May 1893° prohibits their employment about elevators, the act
11 June 1879* provides that they shall not be employed under ground and the acts 2
June 1891° and 15 May 1893° prohibits their employment in mines.
The act 31 March 1860* punishes the maltreatment of infants and the acts 25 May
18875 and 9 June 1893° provides for associations for the prevention of cruelty to
children. The act 12 June, 1893° provides that no child under sixteen shall be con-
fined or transported in company with adults and that their trial shall be separate and
apart from the trial of other criminal cases.
informers.
INFORMER. The person who informs against, or prosecutes in any of the courts of
justice, those who offend against any law or penal statute.’
A common informer may bring an action in his own name, whether the penalty be
given to him in whole or in part; and that without any positive direction in the act
imposing the penalty.*
Wherever a thing i is prohibited by astatute under a penalty, and that penalty, or
any part thereof, is given to him who will sue for the same, any person may bring an
action for the penalty and recover the same.® But an infant cannot be a common in-
former; nor a corporation, unless specially authorized.”
A common informer may maintain an action of debt, though the statute giving the
penalty, does not, in express terms, provide for the form of action.”
Informers, under the summary proceedings authorized by the “ act for the preven-
tion of vice and immorality,’ and other similar acts, are not liable for costs, if they
fail in establishing their accusations.” And as an informer has no interest, until
judgment, he cannot recover damages for detention of the penalty ; though it is other-
wise as to a party grieved.”
1 Purd. 1014, 88 W.&S. 346.
3 Thid. 1015. 9 Esp. on Penal Actions 18.
§ Ibid. 1016. 10 Tbid. 19-20.
: Ibid. 1017. = Ibid. ie
Ibid. 1018. 21 Ash. 413.
§ Ibid. 1019. 131 Y. 408. 2 BR. 196.
™Whart. L. Dict. 376.
[ 544 ]
Jinns and Caberns.
I. Statutes regulating innkeepers. 14, License to be framed.
1. To keep good entertainment. 15. No credit to be given.
2. Not to encourage gambling. 16. Penalty for selling without license.
3. Nor to allow gambling in their houses. 17. Penalty for violation of license laws.
4. Penalty on conviction. 18. When house to be a nuisance.
5. Penalty for harboring apprentices, &c. 19. Riots.
6. Tavern reckonings not recoverable. 20. Violation of preceding section.
7. Such suits to abate. 21. Waiter-girls not to be employed.
8. By what measure liquors to be sold. 22. Penalty for so doing.
9. Penalty for furnishing liquors to intem 23. Forfeiture of license.
perate persons. 24, Lien on horses at livery.
10, How notice may be given. 25. Limitation of liability.
11. Civil liability for damages. 26. How notice thereof to be given.
12. To whom and when liquors shall not be 27. Lien on goods of boarders.
sold.
13. Penalty for permitting drunkenness in
their houses.
II. Authorities in relation to inns and inn-
keepers.
I. Act 11 Marcu 1834. Purd. 1021.
(1.) Sect. 17. Every innkeeper shall keep good entertainment for man and horsey
under penalty of five dollars for every case of neglect.
(2.) Suor. 18. Ifanyinnkeeper, tavern-keeper or other retailer of wine, spirituous
or other strong drink, shall incite, promote or encourage any games of address,
hazard, cock-fighting, bullet-playing or horse-racing, at which any money or other
valuable thing shall be betted, staked, striven for, won or lost, or shall furnish any
wine, spirituous liquors, beer, cider or other strong drink, to any of the persons
assembled or attending upon any such game, fight, play or race, such person shall
forfeit and pay, upon conviction of the first offence, fourteen dollars, and upon a
second conviction of the offence, twenty-eight dollars.
(3.) Sxor. 19. And if any such person shall permit and allow any kind of game of
address or hazard, or any playing, betting or gaming for money, or other thing
of value whatsoever, either at cards, dice, billiards, bowls, shuffle-boards, or any
game or device, in any other manner to be practised, played or carried on within
his or her dwelling-house, out-house, shed or other place, in his or her occupancy,
such person shall, for the first and second offence respectively, forfeit and pay the
like sums.
(4.) Seor. 20. And if any innkeeper or tavern-keeper, or other licensed retailer
of wine or other liquors, shall offend as aforesaid, the licence of such person shall,
upon his conviction thereof, become void, and such offender shall be incapable of
being again licensed in like manner for one year thereafter ; and upon such second
conviction, such person shall, in addition to the penalty aforesaid, be for ever in-
capable of being a public-house keeper or retailer, as aforesaid, within this com-
monwealth.
(5.) Suor. 21. No innkeeper or tavern-keeper shall receive, harbor, entertain or
trust any person under the age of twenty-one years, or any apprentice or servant
knowing him to be such, or after being warned to the contrary by the parent,
guardian, master or mistress of such minor, apprentice or servant, under penalty
for the first or second offence, of three dollars over and above the forfeiture of any
debt contracted by such minor, apprentice or servant, for liquors or entertainment ;
and for the third offence, under penalty of fifteen dollars, and the forfeiture of hie
licence, and of being for ever incapable of receiving a licence to keep a public inn
within this commonwealth.
(6.) Sxor. 22. No innkeeper or tavern-keeper shall trust or give credit to any
person whatsoever for liquors, under penalty of losing and forfeiting such debt.
(7.) Sor. 23. Every suit brought by an innkeeper or tavern-keeper, for tavern
reckonings as aforesaid, or for a debt contracted by a minor, apprentice or servant,
after a warning to the contrary, as aforesaid, shall abate, or the defendant may plead
such fact in bar thereof, and the plaintiff therein shall pay double costs.
INNS AND TAVERNS. 545
Act oF 1705. Purd. 888.
(8.) Szcr. 1. All persons which now are or which at any time or times hereafter
shall be licensed to keep any tavern, inn, ale-house or victualling-house, within this
province, shall sell beer and ale by wine-measure to all persons as drink it in their
houses, and by beer-measure to all such persons as carry it out of their houses,
under the penalty of ten shillings, to the use of the poor for every county where
the offence is committed.
Act 8 May 1854. Purd. 1082.
(9.) Sxcr. 1. Wilfully furnishing intoxicating drinks by sale, gift or otherwise,
to any person of known intemperate habits, to a minor,’ or to an insane person, for
use as a beverage,’ shall be held and deemed a misdemeanor, and upon conviction
thereof, the offender shall be fined not less than ten nor more than fifty dollars, and
undergo an imprisonment of not less than ten nor more than sixty days ;> and the
wilful furnishing of intoxicating drinks as a beverage to any person when drunk or
intoxicated shall be deemed a misdemeanor, punishable as aforesaid.
(10.) Szor. 2. It shall be lawful for any member of the family, or blood relation
of an intemperate person, or any overseer of the poor, or any magistrate of the
district in which such intemperate person resides, or has legal settlement, or the com-
mittee of an habitual drunkard, to give a distinct notice, verbal or written, to any
innkeeper, merchant, grocer, distiller, brewer or other person manufacturing, sell-
ing or having intoxicating liquors, forbidding him or them from furnishing such
intemperate person or habitual drunkard with intoxicating drinks or liquors, and
if, within three months after such notice, any one to whom the same is given shall
furnish or cause to be furnished intoxicating liquors to such intemperate person or
habitual drunkard, to be used as a beverage, he shall be deemed guilty of a misde-
meanor, and, upon coaviction thereof, shall be punished as provided in the first
section of this act.
(11.) Scr. 38. Any person furnishing intoxicating drinks to any other person in
violation of any existing law, or of the provisions of this act, shall be held civilly
responsible for any injury to person or property in consequence of such furnishing ;
and any one aggrieved may recover full damages against such person so furnish-
ing, by action on the case, instituted in any court having jurisdiction of such foruw.
of action in this commonwealth.*
Act 13 May 1887. Purd. 1230.
(12.) Scr. 17. It shall not be lawful for any person, with or without license, to
furnish, by sale, gift or otherwise, to any person any spirituous, vinous, malt or
brewed liquors on any day upon which elections are now or hereafter may be required
to be held, nor on Sunday, nor at any time to a minor, or a person of known intem-
perate habits, or a person visibly affected by intoxicating drink, either for his or her
use, or for the use of any other person, or to sell or furnish liquors to any person on a
pass-book or order on a store, or to receive from any person any goods, wares, mer-
chandise or provisions in exchange for liquors, shall be held and deemed a misde-
meanor, and, upon conviction thereof, the offender shall be fined not less than fifty
nor more than five hundred dollars, and undergo an imprisonment of not less than
twenty nor more than ninety days.!
Act 31 Marcu 1856. Purd. 1233.
(13.) Scr. 30. Any person who shall sell spirituous or other intoxicating liquors
as aforesaid, to any person who shall drink the same on the premises where sold, and
1 The constable’s return is sufficient to author- whereof, he fell under the wheels of his wagon,
ize the issuing of process against the offender. and was killed. 40 Penn. St. 95. It is no de-
67 Penn. St. 30. fence, that the vendor did not know that the
2 A widow may maintain an action against an purchaser was intoxicated. 32 Am. L. Reg.
innkeeper, for unlawfully furnishing liquor to <
her husband, when intoxicated, in consequence 3 Pard. 1230.
546 INNS AND TAVERNS.
become thereby intoxicated, shall, besides his liability in damages under any existing
law, be fined five dollars for every such offence, to be recovered, in debt, before any
alderman or justice of the peace, by any wife, husband, parent, child, relative or
guardian of the person so injured, and levied upon the goods and chattels of the de-
fendant, without exemption: Provided, That suits shall not be instituted after
twenty days from the commission of the offences in this and the preceding section.
Act 13 May 1887. Purd. 1228-1231.
(14.) Sect. 13. Every person receiving such license to sell spirituous, vinous, malt
or brewed liquors, or any admixture thereof, shall frame his license under a glass and
place the same so that it shall at all times be conspicuous and easily read in his chief
place of making sale, and no such license shall authorize sales by any person who shall
neglect this requirement.
(15.) Szct. 14. No licensee who shall sell liquors by less measure than one quart
shall trust or give credit therefor under penalty of losing and forfeiting such debt,
and no action shall be maintained or recovery had in any case for the value of liquors
sold in violation of the provisions of this section, and defence may be taken in said
cases against such recovery without special plea of notice.
(16.) Scr. 15. Any person who shall hereafter be convicted of selling or offering
for sale any vinous, spirituous, malt or brewed liquors, or any admixture thereof,
without a license, shall be sentenced to pay a fine of not less than five hundred dollars
nor more than five thousand dollars, and undergo an imprisonment in the county jail
of not less than three months nor more than twelve months.
(17.) Sect. 16. Any person having license, who shall hereafter be convicted of
violating any of the provisions of the license laws, shall be subjected to a fine of not
less than one hundred nor more than five hundred dollars, and for any second offence
whereof he shall be convicted, of not less than three hundred nor more than one thou-
sand dollars, and for any third offence whereof he shall be convicted, a fine of not
less than five hundred nor more than five thousand dollars, and undergo an imprison-
ment in the county jail of not less than three months nor more than twelve months, or
both or either, at the discretion of the court. Any person convicted of more than one
offence shall not again be licensed in any city or county of the commonwealth, and the
license of any person permitting the customary visitation of disreputable persons, or
keeping a disorderly place, may, upon proof, be at any time revoked by the court,
and when thus revoked the same party shall not again be licensed in any city or county
of the commonwealth.
(18.) Secr. 18. Any house, room or place, hotel, inn or tavern, where vinous,
spirituous, malt or brewed liquors are sold, offered for sale, drank or given away, in
violation of any law of this commonwealth, shall be held and declared a nuisance, and
shall be abated by proceedings at law or equity. All expenses connected with such
proceedings, including a counsel fee of twenty dollars for the counsel of complainant,
shall be paid by defendant or defendants.
Act 16 Aprin 1849. Purd. 1230.
(19.) Sxcr. 16. Whenever any riot or other breach of the peace shall occur at or
within any tippling-house, or other place where spirituous, vinous or malt liquors are
sold, without a license being taken out in conformity to the provisions of this act, the
proprietor or keeper of such tippling-house or other place where such liquors are so
sold shall be deemed and taken to be an aider and abettor in such riot or other breach
of the peace, and shall be liable to be prosecuted and punished as such.
(20.) Sxor. 17. Every person convicted under the preceding section of this act shall
be subject to a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars, and be imprisoned for a term
INNS AND TAVERNS. 547
not exceeding twelve calendar months, at the discretion of the court having jurisdic-
tion of the offence.
Act 26 Frspruary 1855. Purd. 1230.
Secr. 1. It shall not be lawful for any person or persons to sell, trade or barter in
any spirituous or malt liquors, wine or cider on the first day of the week, commonly
called Sunday, or for the keeper or keepers of any hotel, inn or tavern, ale-house,
beer-house, or other public house or place, knowingly to allow or permit any spirit-
uous or malt liquors, wine or cider to be drank on or within the premises, or house
occupied or kept by such keeper or keepers, his, her or their agents or servants, on
the said first day of the week.
Srct. 2. Any person or persons violating the provisions of the foregoing section
shall, for each and every offence, forfeit and pay the sum of fifty dollars, one-half of
which shall be paid to the prosecutor, and the other half to the guardians of the poor
of the city or county in which the suit was brought, or in the counties having no
guardians of the poor, then to the overseers of the poor of the township, ward or
borough in which the offence was committed; to be recovered before any mayor,
alderman, burgess or justice of the peace as debts of like amount are now by law re-
coverable, in any action of debt brought in the name of the commonwealth, as well
for the use of the guardians of the poor (or for the overseers of the poor of the town-
ship, ward or borough, as the case may be), as for the person suing: Provided, That
when any prosecutor is himself a witness on any trial under the provisions of this sec-
tion, then the whole penalty or forfeiture shall be paid to the guardians or overseers
aforesaid: And provided further, That it shall be a misdemeanor in office for any
such mayor, alderman, burgess or justice of the peace to neglect to render to the said
guardians of the poor and prosecutor the amount of such penalty within ten days after
the payment of the same.
This act, so far as it fixes a penalty for selling on Sunday, is not repealed.t The
act 29 April 1867, requires the fines and penalties to be paid to the guardians of the
poor. A justice of the peace cannot issue a capias or warrant of arrest for the re-
covery of the penalty. An appeal will be stricken off if taken without the allowance
of the court. It cannot be entered nunc pro tunc.? Where the defendant is com-
mitted upon a capias issued upon a judgment for the penalty, he can only be released
under the insolvent law.*
It is an indictable conspiracy for two or more persons to act in concert, in unlawful
measures to enforce the Sunday liquor law by inducing a tavern-keeper to furnish
beer on that day by artifice or persuasion. But it is not maintenance for one or more
persons to contribute money to employ counsel to carry on the criminal prosecution;
nor does it go to impeach their credit as witnesses; if, however, such aid be given
from malicious motives, and without probable cause, it is ground for an action for
malicious prosecution.®
An indictment for selling on Sunday need only aver the fact of sale on that day ; it
need not aver the names of persons to whom the liquor was sold.’ On the trial
the prosecution must prove a sale at the defendant’s house, and that it was by his
permission.2 The mere admission of visitors into a tavern on Sunday is not a viola-
tion of the statute, unless liquor be actually sold.®
A municipal corporation may be empowered to punish by summary conviction an
action which is not only indictable under the state law, but is also an offence against
the municipal government ; such as keeping a bawdy-house, or selling liquor on Sun-
day ; these are regulations of police.”
115 W.N, Ne 873. 101 P.S. 355. -6 Bright. 44, 8 Haz. Pa, Reg. 209.
21L.V.2 71 Pears. 107,
32 Del. Ae 829 L. I. 188.
£12 C, C. 147. 99 Phila. 569.
59 Phila, 569, 1030 Pitts. L. J. 14.
x
548 INNS AND TAVERNS.
Act 28 Marcu 1878. Purd. 1022.
(21.) Sxor. 1. It shall not be lawful for any owner, proprietor, keeper or agent
of any hotel, tavern, saloon or eating-house, or other places where intoxicating
liquors are sold, to employ or permit the employment of any female,’ at any such
hotel, tavern, saloon or eating- house, to sell, vend, offer, procure, furnish, or distri-
bute any intoxicating drinks, or any admixture thereof, ale, beer, wine or cider, to
any person or persons, or to employ any female as lady conversationalist, or for the
purpose of attracting persons to such places, or to permit the assembling of females
at such places as aforesaid, for the purpose of enticing customers, or making assigna-
tions for improper purposes; nor shall it be lawful for any female, not having a
licence, as permitted by the laws of this commonwealth, for the sale of intoxicating
liquors, to sell at any hotel, tavern, eating-house or saloon, offer, procure, furnish or
distribute any intoxicating drinks, or any mixture thereof, ale, beer, wine or cider
to any person or persons: Provided, That nothing in this act shall be so construea
as to prevent the wife or daughter of any person having a licence for selling or
distributing aforesaid liquors?
(22.) Sor. 2. Any person violating the provisions of this act shall be guilty of
a misdemeanor, and upon conviction of the same, shall be sentenced to pay a fine
of not less tian one hundred dollars nor more than five hundred dollars for each
and every female so employed, or undergo an imprisonment of not more than three
months or more than one year, or either or both, at the discretion of the court having
jurisdiction of the case.
(23.) Sor. 3. No licence for the sale of intoxicating liquors shall be granted to
any person or persons, except upon the express condition that the person or persons
so licensed shall and will not employ any female or females as provided in the first
section hereof; and any person or persons so licensed shall, upon conviction for
violating the provisions hereof, in addition to the penalties provided in the second
section, forfeit his, her or their licence.
; Act 7 Aprit 1807. Purd. 1023.
(24.) Sct. 1. All livery-stable keepers and innkeepers within this common-
wealth shall have a lien upon any and every horse delivered to them to be kept in
their stables, for the expense of the keeping; and in case the owner of the said horse
or horses, or the person who delivered them for keeping to the keeper of the livery
stable, or innkeepers, shall not pay and discharge the said expeuse, provided it
amounts to thirty dollars, within fifteen days after demand made of him personally,
or in case of his removal from the place where such livery-stable or inn is kept,
within ten days after notice of the amount due, and demand of payment in writing
left at his last place of abode, the livery-stable keeper, or innkeeper, may cause the
horse or horses aforesaid to be sold at public sale according to law, and after deduct-
ing from the amount of sales the costs of sale and the expense of keeping, shall
deliver the residue, upon demand, to the person or the agent of the person who de-
livered the horse or horses to him for keeping: Provided always, that nothing in ,
this act contained, shall be construed to impair any right of action, which the said
livery-stable keepers or innkeepers may have against any person or persons, for the
keeping his or their horse or horses.
1 Or minor under the age of 16 years, by act
11 June 1879. See tit. Infants.
2Tho law cannot be evaded by a collusive
partnership with the waiter-girls. 88 Penn. St.
137.
3 The lien given by this act is joint and sev-
eral; one horse may be detained for the keep-
ing of a number ; and the use of the horses, from
time to time, does not impair the lien, which is
a charge against the owner. 23 Penn. St. 193.
The lien, however, is restricted to the expenses
of keeping the horses; it does not extend to the
board of the drivers: 34 Leg. Int. 384; nor to
the care and storage of wagons and harness. 1
Chest. Co. R. 460. 30 Hun. 234, And one who
takes a horse to board, with knowledge that he
is not the property of the bailor, has no lien
ag against the real owner. 1 Del. Co. R. 111.
A sale under this act of a stolen horse, does not
divest the owner's title. 43 Penn. St. 507.
INNS AND TAVERNS. 549
Act 7 May 1855. Purd. 1023.
(25.) Scr. 1. Whenever the proprietor or proprietors of any hotel, inn or
boarding-house, shall provide a good, sufficient and secure safe in the office of such
hotel, or other convenient place for the safe-keeping of any money, goods, jewelry
and valuables belonging to the guests and boarders! of such hotel, inn or boarding-
house, and shall notify the guests and boarders thereof, by placing in every lodging
room, parlor and public hall and other conspicuous places, printed cards or notices,
stating the fact that such safe is provided, in which such goods, jewelry and valuables
may be deposited, and that the proprietor or proprietors thereof will not be respon-
sible for said money, goods, jewelry and valuables unless deposited in said safe ; and
if any such guest or boarder shall neglect to deposit such money, goods, jewelry or
valuables in such safe, the proprietor or proprietors aforesaid not shall be liable for
any loss of such money, goods, jewelry or valuables, sustained by such guest, by
theft or otherwise : Provided, That nothing herein contained shall apply to such
an amount of money, and such articles of goods, jewelry and valuables, as is usual,
common and prudeut for any such guest or boarder to retain in his room, or about
his person.
(26.) Sect. 2. Whenever the proprietor or proprietors of any hotel, inn or
boarding-house shall post in a conspicuous manner as aforesaid, notices requiring
said guest or boarder to bolt the door of the room or rooms occupied by said guest
or boarder, or in leaving the said room or rooms, to lock the door and to deposit the
key or keys with the proprietor or the clerk at office ; [and] if such guest or boarder
shall neglect so to do, the proprietor or proprietors as aforesaid shall not be liable
for any baggage of such guest or boarder, which may be stolen from said room or
rooms: Provided, That said proprietor or proprietors shall clearly establish the fact
of said room or rooms having been left unbolted or unlocked by said guest or
boarder, at the time of the loss of said baggage as aforesaid.
(27.) Sror. 4. All proprietor or proprietors of hotels, ions and boarding-houses
within this commonwealth, shall have a lien upon the goods and baggage belonging
to any sojourner, boarder or boarders, for any amount of indebtedness contracted
for boarding and lodging, for any period or time not exceeding two weeks,” and
shall have the right to detain said goods and baggage until the amount of said
indebtedness is paid; and at the expiration of three months the said proprietor or
proprietors may make application to any alderman or justice of the peace of the
proper city, borough or county, who is hereby authorized to issue his warrant to
any constable within said city, borough or county, and cause him to expose the
said goods and baggage to public sale, after giving at least ten days’ notice by public
written or printed notices, put up in three or more public places in the ward of
said city or borough, or in the township where said inn, hotel or boarding-house is
located; and after he shall have sold the same he shall make return thereof to the
said justice or alderman, who shall, after payment of all costs and the said amount
of indebtedness, pay over the balance, if any there be, to the owner or owners of
said goods and baggage: Provided, That the owner or owners of said goods and
baggage shall have the right to redeem said goods and baggage at any time within
the said three months, upon paying the amount of said indebtedness, and at any
time previous to the sale as aforesaid, upon paying also the additional cost established
by law for like services.
II. A person who makes it his business to entertain travellers and passengers,
and provide lodging and necessaries for them and their horses and attendants, is a
common innkeeper ; and it is no way material whether he have any sign before his
door or not?
Every one at common law is entitled to keep a public inn (but not an ale-house.
or tavern), and may be indicted and fined as guilty of a public nuisance, if he
usually harbor thieves or suffer frequent disorders in his house ; or take exorbitant
} As to the distinction between guests and 2 The words “not exceeding two weeks,” are
boarders, see 5 W. N. C. 10. 13 Phila. 2. 94 repealed as to Erie county, by act 15 April 1869.
N.Y. 1. An innkeeper is not liable for a loss Pamph. 971.
occasioned by the personal negligence of the guest 3 Palm. 374. 1 Bouv. Inst. 408.
himself. 98 U. S. 218. And see 87 Penn. St. 376.
550 INNS AND TAVERNS.
prices, or refuse to receive a traveller as a guest into his house, or to find him
vietuals upon the tender of a reasonable price.’ It is said also that setting up a
new inn, where there is already a sufficient number of ancient and well-governed
inns, is a nuisance? It was resolved by all the judges, that any person might erect
an inn to lodge travellers, without any licence or allowance for such erection.’
It is the duty of an innkeeper to receive into his house all strangers and travellers
who may call on him for entertainment, provided he has room, and they tender him
a reasonable sum for the accommodations which they demand. But he may refuse
to permit one to enter, being responsible for any injury the stranger or traveller
might thereby sustain, if his house was not full And it is said, he may also be
indicted, at the suit of the commonwealth, for refusing to receive a guest under
such circumstances.®
An innkeeper has the same control over his dwelling that any other person has,
being responsible for the consequences of his conduct. He may refuse to admit or
expel an obnoxious person from his house, and in so doing, may use as much force
as is necessary, without being guilty of an assault and battery. And it makes no
difference that the person expelled, called to see a guest at the inn; although by an
improper exercise of his right, he may render himself liable for any injury thereby
sustained either by the guest or visitor.®
The innkeeper is entitled to a just compensation for his care and trouble, in
attending to his guest and his property, aud finding him what he may require. To
enable him to recover this, the law has given him various remedies ; he has a lien
upon all the property of his guest, in the inn and its stables, for his claim as inn-
keeper. The lien does not, however extend to the person of his guest, though
formerly a different rule prevailed.”
Inns were allowed for the benefit of travellers, who have certain privileges whilst
they are on their journeys, and are in a more peculiar manner protected by the law;
it is for this reason that the inkeeper shall answer for those things which are
stolen within the inn, though not delivered to him to keep, and though he was not
acquainted that the guest brought the goods to the inn, for it shall be intended to
be through his negligence or occasioned by the fault of him or his servants.§
There is in law an implied contract with a common innkeeper to secure his guest’s
goods at his inn And this duty and burden enjoined on innkeepers by law, they
cannot discharge themselves of, under pretence of sickness, want of understanding,
absence from their houses, or the like. So if he puts a horse to pasture, without
the direction of his guest, and the horse is stolen, he must make satisfaction.
(But otherwise if with his direction.)"
Although a common carrier is liable for all losses occasioned by an armed mob
(not being public enemies), an innkeeper would not be liable for such a loss. Nor
would he be liable (it should seem) for a loss by robbery and burglary by persons
from without the inn. But this doctrine should be now stated with some hesitation ;
. for in a later case,” Bayley, J., said: “It appears to me, that the innkeeper’s lia-
bility very closely resembles that of a carrier. He is prima fucie liable for any loss
not occasioned by the act of God or the king’s enemies; although he may be
exonerated where the guest chooses to have his goods under his own care.”
In like manner, if an innkeeper bids his guest take the key of his chamber and
lock the door, and tells him that he will not take the charge of the goods; yet if
they are stolen he shall be answerable, because he is charged by law for all things
which come to his inn, and he cannot discharge himself by such or the like words.™
Holt, C. J., doubted whether a man is a guest by setting up his horse at an inn,
though he never went into the inn himself; but the other three justices held, that
such person is a guest, by leaving his horse, as much as if he had stayed himself,
11 Hawk, P. C. 714. 8 8 Co. 32 b.
2 Ibid. 1 Russ. on Cr. 298. 93 Bl. Com. 164, 1 Y¥.34. 62 Penn. St. 92.
3 Dalt. c. 56. 87 Ibid. 376.
4 2 Pars. 431. 1 Bouv. Inst. 408. Andsee2L. 1° Bac. Abr. 182,
Law Rev. 236. 1 Thid.
5 1 Hawk. P. 0.714. Whart. Pr. 911 n. 28B.& 0.9.
6 2 Pars. 431. 18 Story Bailm. 309. 9 Am. L. Reg. 435.
1 1 Bouv. Inst. 410. 3 Hill 488, M4 Dalt. c. 56. Blackerley 169
INNS AND TAVERNS. 551
because the horse must be fed, by which the innkeeper has gain; otherwise, if he
had left a trunk or a dead thing
So, if a man comes to an inn with a hamper in which he hath certain goods (to
wit, hats, as the case was), and departs, leaving it with the host, and two days after
comes again ; whereas, in the time of his absence, this was stolen, he shall not have
any action against the host, because he was not a guest at the time of the stealing,
and the host had no benefit by the keeping thereof, and therefore shall not be
charged for the loss thereof in his absence.
An innkeeper is liable for whatever is deposited in his house; but if the trust
of the depositor be reposed in another person living in the house, the case is taken
out of the general rule. In order to give this protective security to the goods, the
owner of them must be a guest at the inn ; that is, he must be a person who stays
there under an express or implied agreement to be supplied with his personal
wants, for a just compensation, for unless he be invested with that character, his
goods will not be protected to the extent of those of a guest; one who stays at an
inn as his home, under a special contract, is not a guest but a boarder.*
A notice by an innkeeper that all valuable articles must be deposited in the safe
of the hotel, and if not so deposited, that he would not be responsible for them, if
lost, does not apply to articles of personal comfort or convenience, as a watch or
clothing.® But the innkeeper will not be liable for the theft of such articles,
if the guest has acted with negligence, and has not availed himself of ordinary
precautions for their protection.®
Where the guest, having packed his luggage for departure, locks his room, gives
notice thereof to a clerk, and leaves the key of the room with such clerk, at the
office, the innkeeper will be responsible for money stolen from a trunk, althongh a
notice may have been brought to the knowledge of the guest, requiring money and
valuables to be placed in a safe at the office, during his sojourn at the inn,’
A tavern or innkeeper may recover from a guest the amount of his bill for board-
ing, not being prohibited as a tavern reckoning by act of March 11th, 1834.8 The
keeper of a public-house or inn cannot recover in an action upon a book account
for liquors, or any other tavern reckoning, which exceeds in amount twenty shillings.®
An account for liquor sold on erédit by a tavern-keeper is null within the act of
1834; hence, an allowance for such liquors so furnished, on a settlement of accounts,
will not avail the innkeeper.”
PETITION FOR TAVERN LICENSE.
In the Court of Quarter Sessions for the County of Philadelphia, No. — 1895.
In the matter of the Petition of John Smith for a retail liquor license.
To the Honorable the Judges of the said Court: The petition of John Smith of
190 South 8th Street in the 8th Ward of the city of Philadelphia, respectfully repre-
sents:
1. That his name is John Smith and he resides at 190 South 8th Street in the 8th
Ward of the city of Philadelphia, and has resided there since the first day of January
1893.
2. The particular place for which a license is desired is at 190 South 8th Street, in
the 8th Ward of the city of Philadelphia.
3. The petitioner is a naturalized citizen of the United States. He was born at
London, England, on January Ist, 1860, and was naturalized an American citizen on
the first day of January, 1887, at Philadelphia, by the decree of the Court of Com-
mon Pleas No. 1 for the first judicia! district of Pennsylvania.
4. The owner of said premises for which a license is desired is Thomas Jones, who
resides at 190 South 7th Street in the city of Philadelphia.
5. That the said place for which a license is desired is necessary for the accommo-
dation of the public.
6. That the said petitioner John Smith is in no manner pecuniarily interested in
11 Salk. 388. 6 Ibid. And see 21 N. Y. 111.
21 Roll. Abr. 2. 74H. D. Sm. 88.
BUY, 34. 82M. 323. 18 Penn. St, 48.
41 Bouv. Inst. 409. See5 W.N.C.10. 94 96 W. 65.
N.Y. 1. 10 2 Penn. St, 77.
514 La. An. 424; s.c. 8 Am. L. Reg. 561.
552 INNS AND TAVERNS.
the profits of any business conducted in any other place in the said county of Phila-
delphia where any intoxicating liquors are sold or kept for sale. 40
7. That your petitioner is the only person in any manner pecuniarily interested
in the business hereby asked to be licensed; and your petitioner further states and
pledges himself that no other person shall be in any manner pecuniarily interested
therein during the continuance of the license prayed for.
8. Your petitioner has had no license for the sale of liquors in this commonwealth
revoked during any portion of the year preceding this application.
‘9. Your petitioner offers the names of Robert Thompson, residing at 190 South 10th
Street, and James Brown, residing at 190 South 11th Street, both of whom are repu-
table freeholders of the said county where the liquor is to be sold, who will be your
petitioner's surety on the bond which is required by law. Each of said sureties is the
bona fide holder of real estate in the said county worth, over and above all incum-
brances, the sum of $2,000.00. It would sell for that much at public sale. Neither
of said sureties is engaged in the manufacture of spirituous, vinous, malt or brewed
liquors.
10. Your petitioner annexes hereto a certificate signed by twelve reputable, quali-
fied electors of the said 8th Ward as required by the sixth section of the act of 13
May 1887.
Your petitioner therefore prays your honorable court that upon his filing his bond
in two thousand dollars with the two sufficient sureties above set forth conditioned
as provided by the tenth section of the act 18 May 1887, and the payment by him of
the sum of one thousand dollars into the city treasury and his otherwise compliance
with the provisions of said act, your honors will grant him a license for one year from
the first day of June, 1895, for the sale of vinous, spirituous, malt and brewed liquors
in quantities not exceeding one quart at 190 South 8th Street, in the 8th Ward of the
city of Philadelphia aforesaid.
And he will ever pray, ete.
JoHN SMITH.
The truth of the petition must be sworn to before the clerk of the court.
CERTIFICATE OF ELECTORS.
The undersigned qualified electors of the 8th Ward of the city of Philadelphia do
hereby certify :
That they are reputable, qualified electors of the 8th Ward of the city of Philadel-
phia; that they have been acquainted with John Smith, the said petitioner, and have
good reason to believe that each and all the statements contained in his said petition
are true.
They therefore pray that the prayer of said petitioner be granted and that the
license prayed for may issue.
Name, Residence. Occupation.
[ 553 J
Iinsolbent Laws,
(Proceedings, Forms, &c.)
L. Jurisdiction of the courts to discharge insol- tenced by a criminal court.
vents. VII. Allowance to poor and insolvent debtors,
II. Proceedings to obtain a discharge from con- VIII. Petition for leave to give bond.
finement. IX. Insolvent bond,
IIL. The petition and proceedings thereon. X. Petition for discharge as an insolvent
IV. Effect of the disharge. : debtor.
V. After-acquired Deeper of an insolvent. XI. Form of notice.
VI. When relief may be given to persons sen- XII. Form of an insolvent’s discharge.
Since the passage of the act to abolish imprisonment for debt, a knowledge of
the provisions of the insolvent laws has ceased to be of that practical importance
that it was under the former system; they have not, therefore, been inserted so
much at large as in former editions of this work, but only such portions of them as
were deemed of the most general interest to magistrates. Mere poverty is not
insolvency: insolvency is the owing of debts in excess of the value of tangible
property."
I. JURISDICTION OF THE COURTS TO DISCHARGE INSOLVENTS.
The several courts of common pleas of this commonwealth shall have power to
grant relief to insolvent debtors, residing or being within this commonwealth, on
application made in the manner hereafter provided.”
The jurisdiction of the said courts may be exercised as follows, and not other-
Wise, viz. :
1. In the case of a person arrested or detained by virtue of any process issued
in any civil suit or proceeding, for the recovery of money or damages, or for' the
non-performance of any decree or sentence for the payment of money,’ without
collusion with the plaintiff, the court of common pleas of the county*in which such
debtor shall be arrested or detained, shall have power to grant relief as aforesaid.
2. In the case of a person held on a bail-piece, issued in any such suit or pro-
ceeding, the court of common pleas of the county in which the suit was instituted,
shall have power to grant relief, as aforesaid.
3. In the case of a debtor not arrested, detained or held as aforesaid, such power
may be exercised by the court of common pleas of the county in which such debtor
shall reside.
But no debtor shall be entitled to relief under this act, unless he shall have
resided within this commonwealth® for six months immediately preceding his appli-
cation to the court, or shall have been confined in jail for three months immediately
preceding such application.”
II. PRocEEDINGS TO OBTAIN A DISCHARGE FROM CONFINEMENT.
Tt shall be lawful for any judge of the court of common pleas aforesaid, or for the
prothonotary of such court, to make an order for (the) discharge of any debtor
arrested, detained or held by virtue of any process or bail-piece, as aforesaid,® on his
1100 Penn. St. 437.
2 Act 16 June 1836 31. Purd. 1027.
3 A person in execution for damages in tort, is
entitled to relief. 1 Bro. 57. So is one in custody,
under an attachment for non-payment of costs.
Ing. 16. Or, an attachment against an adminis-
trator, to compel payment of a debt due to a
ereditor of the decedent. 1 Ash. 97. 13 W. N.C.
417, Or, of an order in a bastardy case. 1 Wh.
63. But the act does not apply to process issued
out of the federal courts. 5 W.141. 10 Phila.
82. Or, to acommitment for non-compliance with
an order of maintenance, under the act of 1869;
the prisoner must apply for relief under that
statute. 90 Penn. St. 131.
4 One arrested on a testatum ca. sa. can only be
discharged by the court of the county to which
the writ is issued. 3 W. & S. 494.
5 Act 16 June 1836 3 2. Purd. 1027.
6 His residence need not have been in the county.
1 Ash. 94. But if he bas been absent from the
state, prior to the filing of his peti:ion, it lies
upon him to show, that he left with the clear
intention of returning. 2 Ash. 118.
7 Act 16 June 1836 2 3. Purd. 1027.
8 This only applies to final process. 2 Ash. 239.
554 INSOLVENT LAWS.
giving a bond! to the plaintiff in such suit? or proceeding in such amount and with
such security as shall be approved by such judge or prothonotary.*
The order of the judge or prothonotary, as aforesaid, shall direct the officer or
other person having such debtor in custody or confinement, forthwith to- discharge
such debtor, on his paying the jail fees, if any be due.® .
The condition of the bond to be given as aforesaid, shall be, that the said debtor
shall appear at the next term® of the court of common pleas of the said county,’
and then and there present his petition for the benefit of the insolvent laws of this
commonwealth, and comply with all the requisitions of the said law, and abide all
the orders of the said court in that behalf? or in default thereof,? and if he fail in
obtaining his discharge as an insolvent debtor, that he shall surrender himself to
the jail of the said county.”
The officer or other person having such debtor in coufinement or custody, shall
be exonerated, on making a return of the order aforesaid, on the process by which
such debtor was held, and such order being filed with any officer or magistrate, by
whom any bail-piece was issued, shall entitle the bail to be exonerated as effectually
as if the debtor had been surrendered and confined in prison on such bail-piece.”
Provided, That nothing herein contained shll prevent a debtor arrested on a bail-
piece from giving new bail according to law, and obtaining his release thereby.”
III. THE PETITION AND PROCEEDINGS THEREON.
Every petition for relief, as aforesaid, shall be accompanied with the following
schedules :*
1. A statement of all the estate, effects and property of the petitioner, whereso-
ever situate, and of whatsoever kind.’
2. A statement of the debts due by him, containing the names of his creditors,
the amount due to each, and the nature or character of the debt, so far as he can
ascertain the same.”
3. A statement of the causes of his insolvency, and of the extent of his losses,
if any. :
pee the facts set forth in such petition and statements, shall be verified by the
oath or affirmation of the petitioner.
It shall be the duty of the court to which any such petition may be presented, to
1 The obligors wrote their names and affixed
their seals to a piece of paper, and left it with
the judge, with instructions to fill it up as a bond,
conditioned to take the benefit of the insolvent
act, which was accordingly done: held, that the
bond was valid and binding on the parties. 17
8. & R. 438. The insolvent himself need not
sign the bond. 3 P. & W. 64. If one illegally
arrested give bond, instead of suing out a habeas
corpus, the surety will be bound. 8 W.& S. 69.
2 If taken for the use of other creditors, it is
void. 138. & R. 190.
3 Act 16 June 1836 3 4. Purd. 1028.
4 Such discharge is binding on the sheriff,
whether the bond be legal, or otherwise. 4 W.
& 8. 30.
5 Act 16 June 1836 3 5. Purd. 1028,
6 A discharge at the current term of the court,
is a compliance with a condition of the bond. 4
W. & S. 280. Ibid. 465; 2 Ash. 433. So is a
discharge by the court of another county. 5 W.
& 8.155. Oradischarge under the bankrupt law.
6 W.& S. 120. A discharge at any time during
the term is sufficient. 10 W, 228. And whether
founded upon a petition filed in consequene of
the arrest, or independently of it. 12 S.& R, 105.
The application is to be to the next term at which
it can possibly be done 8S. & R. 367. 5 W.
N. C.38. And the bond may be sued out as soon
as the regular term of the court has expired. 38
Penn. St. 270.
7 An insolvent whose application to be dis-
charged is pending n one county, need not make
a second application in another county where he
has been arrested and given bond. 5 W. & S.155.
8 See 14 5. & R. 380; 16 Ibid. 48; 2 R. 183;
and 5 W. 346, as to the form of the bond.
9 Imprisonment for debt, or for crime, would
not excuse performance. 6 W. 508-9. But tke
death of the debtor, during the term, will dis-
charge the surety. 10 W. 228. 2 Ash. 433. And
if the bond be forfeited, the court cannot relieve
him, by allowing the petition to be filed and heard
at a later day. 1 Ash. 102. 1 Pears, 191.
10 Act 16 June 1836 2 6. Purd. 1028, If the ca.
sa. be set aside, the defendant need not surrender.
9 W. 287. The surrender must be on the day the
petition is dismissed. 4 .& S. 30. 50 Penn.
St. 194. 1 Pears. 191. And see 2 R. 163. Ibid.
273. 1P.& W. 270. 4 W.69. 1W.& 58. 382.
5 Ibid. 179. 2 Penn. St. 173. 37 Ibid. 275. 50
Ibid. 194. 96 Ibid. 165. 2 Gr. 389.
Act 16 June 1836 3 7. Purd. 1028,
12 Thid. @ 8.
18 The petition may be amended, before the
hearing. 1 Ash. 159. 5 Phila. 473.
14 A person having no property may be dis-
charged. 1 Binn. 462. If fe les nade a assign-
ment, there must be a schedule of the property
assigned, 1 Ash. 107. Ibid. 118. An omission
without fraudulent motive, may be amended. 1
Ash. 157. And seo 10 Phila. $1.
15 The names of all the creditors, however small,
should be included. 1 Ash.157. See 48. & R. 2.
16 Act 16 June 1836 % 9. Purd. 1028, See
5 W.& 8. 179.
’
INSOLVENT LAWS. 550
fix « time for the hearing of the same, either by a general rule, or by an order to be
made in the particular cause, if the circumstances of the case shall require it.
Notice of the time and place fixed for the hearing as aforesaid, shall be given by
the petitioner to his creditors, at least fifteen days before such hearing, cither per-
sonally or by advertisement published in one or more newspapers, as the court may
direct. ,
At the time and place fixed for the hearing, the petitioner shall exhibit to the
court a just and true account of his debts, credits and estate, whatsoever and
wheresoever situate, and, if so required, shall produce all books and papers in his
possession or under his control, relating to his business and estate, and shall answer
all questions that may be put to him by the court, or (under their control) on the
part of his creditors, touching the same, and shall satisfy the court that he has not
concealed or conveyed to any person whomsoever, for the use of himself, or any of
his family or triends, or whereby to expect any future benefit to him or them, any
part of his estate, effects or credits.’
If upon examination of the petitioner as aforesaid there shall not arise a strong
presumption of fraud,> and if the petitioner shall in other respects appear to be
entitled to relief, the court shall direct an oath or affirmation in the following form,
to be administered to such petitioner :
“I, A. B., do (swear or affirm) that I will deliver up and transfer to my trustees,
for the use of my creditors, all my property that I have, or claim any title to, or
interest in, at this time, and all debts, rights and claims which I now have, or that
LI am in any respect entitled to, in possession, reversion or remainder, and that I
have not, directly or indirectly, at any time, given, sold, conveyed, leased, disposed
of or intrusted any part of my property, rights or claims, to any person, whereby
to defraud my creditors, or any of them, or to secure, receive or expect any profit,
benefit or advantage thereby.””®
The petitioner shall thereupon execute an assignment of all his estate, property
and effects whatsoever,’ to such trustees as may be nominated by two-thirds in
number and value of the creditors then attending, either in person or by attorney,
or in default of such nomination, as shall be appointed by the court®
When such an assignment shall have (been) executed,® the court shall make an
order” that the petitioner shall not at any time thereafter be liable to imprisonment,
by reason of any judgment or decree obtained for the payment of money only, or
for any debt, damages, costs or sum of money, contracted, accrued or occasioned
and due before the time of such order.” ‘
The order of the court as aforesaid, shall be a sufficient warrant for the discharge
of the petitioner from imprisonment, if he shall be in confinement at the time of
such order, or shall be at any time afterwards arrested, by virtue of process in any
action or proceeding for the recovery of any debt or demand, as aforesaid, on his
giving a warrant of attorney, if arrested on mesne process, to appear to the action
and plead thereto.!?
Provided, That if the petitioner shall be in custody or confinement at the time
of such order, by virtue of process issued upon any judgment obtained against him
in an action founded upon actual force,’® or upon actual fraud or deceit,“ or in an
1 Act 16 June 1836 3 10. Purd. 1029.
2 The day on which the notice was first adver-
tised is to be excluded, but the day of hearing
included. 2 Leg. & Ins. R. 77.
3 Adt 16 June 1836 3 11. Purd. 1029. The
notice must specify the hour and place of hearing.
1 Del. Co. R. 1.
4 Act 16 June 1836 212. Purd. 1029.
5 This is confined to his not delivering up his
estate to his creditors. 2 Y. 31. See 1 Ash.
117-18.
& Act 16 June 1836 3 13. Purd. 1029,
T All his estate passes, whether mentioned or
not. 6 Binn. 189. Anda right of action founded
on the taking of his goods. 9S. & R. 249. But
not damages for mere personal tort. Ibid. 4
Ibid. 28. 1 ¥. 245; 2 Dall. 213. Or for an exces-
sive distress. 13 S. & R. 54. Nor the wife’s
choses inaction. 6 W. & S. 290. 10 Penn. St.
432. Nor her right of dower in his lands. 13
Dann G+ ROR And aoa IR Thid 9419
8 Act 16 June 1836 3 14. Purd. 1029,
8 The execution of a formal assignment is not
necessary to vest the estate in the trustees. 15
Penn. St. 385. 17 Ibid. 114. 5 W. 77.
10 The record of the discharge is conclusive, and
cannot be impeached collaterally. 14S. & R. 173.
22 Penn. St. 335.
11 Act 16 June 1836 3 15. Purd. 1029. As to
the effect of the discharge, seel S.& R.31l. 3
Ibid. 559, 4 Ibid. 506. 5 Ibid. 156. 5 Whart.
82. 8W.&S. 183. 1 Ash. 67, 1M. 14. Bald.
296. Crabbe 307. The discharge may be re-
viewed by the supreme court, on certiorari. 37
Penn. St. 275.
2 Act 16 June 1836 3 16. Purd. 1029.
13 An action of trover and conversion is not
within these exceptions. 2 Phila. 393. The
court may go behind the judgment, to ascertain
whether it is founded on actual force. 10 Phila.
81.
M4 An antion for breach of premise of marriage
556 INSOLVENT LAWS.
action for a libel! or slander, malicious prosecution or conspiracy, or in an action for
seduction or criminal conversation, where the damages found by the jury’ shall
exceed the sum of one hundred dollars; or if such petitioner shall be afterwards
arrested by virtue of process issued upon any such judgment obtained against him
previously to such order, he shall not be entitled to be discharged from such impri-
soument or arrest, until he shall have been in actual confinement during a term of
at least sixty days.? oh be
It shall also be lawful for the said court, upon the application of the trustees of
any insolvent, to make an order for the appearance of such insolvent, at such time
and place as may be fixed by the court, to answer upon any interrogatory, or other-
wise, to such questions as may be propounded on the part of the said trustees,
touching the estate and property of such insolvent at the time of his assignment to
the said trustees, and to enforce their orders in the premises, by attachment.’
It shall be lawful for the court, either before or after the discharge of any peti-
tioner as aforesaid, to make an order upon such petitioner to produce and deposit,
either with the prothonotary of the court, or with the trustees, all books, documents,
papers and muniments of title, in his possession or under his control, relating to the
estate and property of such petitioner, and to enforce such order by attachment.?
IV. EFFrectT OF THE DISCHARGE.
Whenever the court shall have directed personal notice to be given to creditors,
of the time and place fixed for hearing the petition of any debtor as aforesaid, the
discharge of such debtor shall not affect the rights and proceedings of those to
whom personal notice shall (not) have been given, according to the order of the
court.®
The discharge of any petitioner who may have been arrested or imprisoned in
avy other county than that of his residence, shall not protect him from arrest or
imprisonment for any debt, except such as may be owing to the party at whose
suit such debtor was arrested or imprisoned."
The discharge of a debtor by virtue of this act, shall not acquit or release any
other person from any debt, contract or engagement, or other liability to which he
was subject, but all other persons shall be answerable for the same in like manner
as if such discharge had not taken place.®
Every such debtor shall be entitled, notwithstanding his assignment, in conformity
to this act, to retain for the use of himself and his family, all such articles as are or
may be by law exempted from levy or sale on any execution, or from distress from
rent, and the property in such articles shall not pass to his trustees.9 4
If any such debtor shall satisfy the claims of his creditors, the court shall order
his estate and effects not sold, to be restored to him, or his legal representatives,
and he shall, by virtue of such order, be seised or possessed thereof as of’ his former
estate and title thereto ; and if upon the final settlement of accounts by the trustees,
there shall be a surplus, after payment of all the claims presented and allowed, the
same shall be paid to such debtor, or his legal representatives.”
V. AFTER-ACQUIRED PROPERTY OF AN INSOLVENT.
The real and personal estate acquired by any debtor, after his discharge, as afore-
said, or in which he shall thereafter become entitled to any interest, legal or equit-
able (except such as may be by law exempted from execution) shall be subject to
his debts," engagements and other liabilities, in like manner, in all respects, as if
such discharge had not taken place, and it shall be lawful for any of his creditors to
is not within this proviso, unless actual fraud be 4 Act 16 June 1836 3 18, Purd. 1030.
proved. 2 Phila. 891. Nor is a case requiring 5 Ibid. 2 19.
a binding over for fraudulent insolvency. 86 6 Ibid. é 31. Purd, 1031,
Penn. St. 371. « Thid. 3 32.
1 See 16 W. N. 0.192. 8 Ibid. 2 33.
. f
2 An award of arbitrators is within this proviso. Ibid. 2 38, Purd. 1032,
O’Neill’s Case, Com. Pleas, Phila., Sept. 1856. MS. 1 Ibid, 3 39. After the lapse of fourteen years,
3 Act 16 June 1836 217 Purd.1029. Such per- the court will presume payment. 14S. & BR. 369.
son may be discharged from oustody on giving 4 Whart. 266. 2.218. 13 Penn. St. 22. See 7 W.
bond ; but not on the final hearing, until he has N. C. 147, as to notice of the application.
undergone sixty days’ actual imprisonment. 2 1! Unless barred by the statute of limitations.
Clark 75. 2 L. Law Rev. 201. 5 R. 136.
INSOLVENT LAWS. 507
issue and execute any new or other process against such real or personal estate, for
the satisfaction of their respective claims, in the same manner as they might hawe
done if such debtor had never been taken in execution.
Whenever a majority in number and value of the creditors of any insolvent, as
aforesaid, residing within the United States, or having a known attorney theorem
shall conseut in writing thereto, it shall be lawful for the court by whom such insol-
vent shall have been discharged, upon the application of such debtor, and notice
given thereof, in the manner hereinbefore provided for giving notice of his original
petition, to make an order that the estate and effects which such insolvent may
afterwards acquire, shall be exempted for the term of seven years thereafter from
execution, for any debt contracted, or cause of action existing previously to such
discharge ;? and if, after such order and consent, any execution shall be issued for
such debt or cause of action, it shall be the duty of any judge of the court from
which such execution issued to set aside the same with costs.®
VI. WHEN RELIEF MAY BE GIVEN TO PERSONS SENTENCED BY A CRIMINAL COURT.
The court of common pleas of any county in which any person may be confined
by sentence or order of any court of this commonwealth, until he restore any stolen
goods or chattels, or pay the value thereof, or in which any person may be confined
for non-payment of any fine, or of the costs of prosecution, or upon conviction of
fornication or bastardy, and for no other cause, shall have power to discharge such
person from such confinement, on his making application and conforming to the
provisions hereinbefore directed in the case of insolvent debtors :* Provided, That
where such persons shall have been sentenced to the payment of a fine, or after a
conviction of fornication and bastardy, he shall not be entitled to make such appli-
cation until after he shall have been in actual confinement, in pursuance of such
sentence, for a period not less than three months.?
Any applicant for the benefit of the insolvent laws, who is or may hereafter be in
confinement under sentence of any criminal court, and who shall be entitled to be
released from such confinement, on a compliance with the provisions of existing acts
of assembly, shall be released on giving bond,* as in civil cases.”
Every person who shall be confined in any jail of this commonwealth, in execu-
tion or otherwise, for any debt, sum of money, fine or forfeiture, not exceeding in
amount the sum of fifteen dollars,® exclusive of costs, and who shall have remained
so confined for the space of thirty days, shall be discharged from such confinement,
if there be no other cause of confinement, and shall not be liable to imprisonment
again for the same cause: Provided, That the estate and effects of such person shall,
notwithstanding such discharge, be liable for such debt or other cause of imprison-
ment, in like manner as before?
The respective boards of inspectors of the state penitentiaries for the eastern and
western districts, shall be authorized to discharge from prison, without the delay
and expense of any proceeding under the insolvent laws of this commonwealth, every
convict who may have served out the term of imprisonment at labor, to which such
prisoner now has been or hereafter may be sentenced, notwithstanding such prisoner
three months. Bright. 462. 1 Pitts.17. Ifthe
2 Act 16 June 1836 2 40. Purd. 1032.
2 Such order suspends the running of the
statute of limitations. 3 Whart. 15. 5 R. 136.
See Ing. 276-7. 4 Phila. 309.
3 Act 16 June 1836 3 41. Purd.1032. See 4 W.
201.
4 The discharge of a prisoner convicted of for-
nication and bastardy, does not relieve him from
the order of maintenance as to subsequently ac-
eruing instalments; payment thereof may be
enforced by attachment. 3 W.N.OC.301. Ibid.
540. But see contra, 4 Ibid. 333, 17 Ibid. 123.
5 Act 16 June, 1836 347. Purd. 1034. A person
who is in prison for non-payment of costs, exceed-
ing $15, cannot be discharged under this section,
until he has been in actual confinement for three
months. 1 Pitts. 17. Ing. 47. Bright. Costs
338-9. And see 10 L. Bar 205. 3 Pitts. 346.
4 Luz. L. Reg. 285.
6 After having been in actual confinement for
application be refused, and he surrender him-
self in discharge of his bond, he is in custody
again under his original sentence, 26 Penn. St.
279.
7 Act 24 January 1849 2 6. Purd.1034. Repealed
as to Schuylkill county, by act 22 March 1850.
Pamph. 231.
8 A resident of the state in confinement for costs
only, under sentence of a criminal cuurt, may be
discharged at once, on giving bond. 40 Leg. Int.
101. One confined for costs on several bills, which
in the aggregate exceed $15, may be discharged
under this section, provided the amount due on
each bill do not exceed that amount. Ing. 47.
Bright. Costs 339. And after remaining in con-
finement thirty days for the fine, he is entitled to
be discharged, both as to the fine and costs. 5 Binn.
489, See Ing.47. Bright. Costs 338-9.
9 Act 16 June 1836 3 48. Purd. 1034,
558 INSOLVENT LAWS.
may not have paid the costs of prosecution, or any fine to the commonwealth, or
restored the property stolen, or paid the value thereof, if, in the judgment of the
said board of inspectors, such prisoner is unable to pay or restore the same :* Pro-
vided always, That such discharge shall in no way interfere with the right of the
commonwealth, or the public officers, or any person or persons interested in the pay-
ment or restitution aforesaid, to proceed under the judgment or judgments of
conviction to recover the amount from the property of such prisoner; and that for
this purpose, the attorney-general or his proper deputy shall, if he deem it for the
interest of the commonwealth, or at the request of any person iaterested, issue writs
of fier’ facias and venditioni exponas, and other writs of execution, as the case may
require, against such property, and all property, real or personal, of such prisoner
taken in execution by virtue of such writs, shall be sold as in other cases real or
personal property is sold by virtue of similar writs; and such sales shall be as avail-
able and effectual in law as sales in other cases by virtue of similar writs: And pro-
vided also, That no such discharge shall be allowed or granted by the said board of
inspectors, until such prisoner shall have exhibited to them, on oath or affirmation,
duplicate schedules of all his property, real, personal and mixed, to which he is in
any manner entitled, as far as he can ascertain the same, one of which schedules or
lists of property it shall be the duty of the said inspectors to file and preserve, with
the papers of the prison, and the other immediately to transmit to the clerk of oyer
and terminer, or the quarter sessions [or mayor’s] court, as the case may be, in which
the said prisoner was tried, to be filed there also, with other papers relating to the
case.?
The commissioners of the several counties of this commonwealth shall be and they
are hereby authorized, upon the order of the court of quarter sessions, or, in vacation,
of a law judge thereof, in the exercise of its or his discretion, and upon such terms as
said court or judge as aforesaid may impose, to discharge from prison, without the delay
and expense of any proceedings under the insolvent laws of this commonwealth, every
convict who shall have served out his or her term of imprisonment, or who shall have
been committed for non-payment of costs only, notwithstanding if he be a convict,
and shall not have paid the costs of prosecution, fine, or made restitution, or paid the
value of stolen goods or property:* Provided, That in the opinion of said commis-
sioners such person is unable to pay or restore the same; and, provided, that such
discharge shall not prevent the commonwealth, or any person interested in such pay-
ment or restitution, from proceeding by action to recover the same from the property
of such person ; but no such person shall be so discharged until he or she shall have
made, under oath or affirmation, duplicate schedules of all his or her property, real,
personal or mixed, so far as he or she can ascertain the same, one of which shall be
filed among the papers of the said prison, and the other with the clerk of the court of
quarter sessions: Provided further, That nothing in said proceedings shall either add
to or take from the liability of said county for costs, under existing laws of this com-
monwealth.+
VII. ALLOWANCE TO POOR AND INSOLVENT DEBTORS.
It shall be the duty of the several courts of common pleas to fix and order a daily
allowance, not exceeding twenty cents,> for ali such poor and insolvent debt-
1 This act only applies to cases of imprison-
entitled to an immediate discharge under this
ment at hard labor, in the state penitentiaries,
act, 2 Chest. Co. R. 235.
for terms exceeding one year; and, of course,
the statutes conferring the like powers upon the
inspectors of county prisons, is subject to the
same restriction. If a convict be improperly
discharged by the inspectors, without payment,
mas be re-arrested upon a capias, 2 Wood.
311.
2 Act 17 January 183131. Purd. 1666. Ex.
tended to the Philadelphia county prison, by
act 11 April 1857. Purd. 848. See act of 6
May 1887, infra, as to the power of county
commissioners to discharge insolvent convicts.
3 One sentenced to pay a fine and costs, is not
* Act 6 May 1887. Purd. 1034.
5 By act 11 April 1856, Purd. 1915, the sev-
eral sheriffs, except those of Allegheny and
Philadelphia, are to receive for boarding pris-
oners, such allowance as may be fixed by the
courts of quarter sessions, not exceeding twenty-
five cents per diem. By act 5 March 1858, this
act is repealed as to Crawford and Erie counties;
but the sheriffs of these counties are not to be al-
lowed more than $2.50 per week for each prisoner.
Pamph. 70. By act 23 March 1865, it is repealed
so far as respects the limitation to twenty-five
INSOLVENT LAWS, 509
ors‘ as shall or may be confined in the prison of their respective counties, and have
not property sufficient to support themselves ; and it shall be the duty of the plaintiff
or plaintiffs, at whose suit any such debtor may be imprisoned, his or their agent or
attorney, upon notice given by the keeper of the prison, to pay the said daily allow-
ance at the prison, on every Monday morning, while the debtor continues in prison;
on failure whereof for the space of three days, the debtor may apply to the court of
tommon pleas, if it be in session, or if not, then to a judge of the same, who,
upon inquiry, and finding the said debtor to be destitute of property for his sup-
port in prison, and failure of payment to have been made as aforesaid, shall forth-
with discharge? the said debtor from imprisonment, and such debtor shall not be
again imprisoned for the same debt or debts.3
The prothonotaries of the several courts of common pleas of this commonwealth
shall be authorized and required * * * to discharge debtors destitute of property for
their support, as fully and amply as any judge may now do, under the provisions of
the 19th section of the act of the 29th March 1814, entitled ‘‘an act for the relief
of insolvent debtors,’’*
In all cases of imprisonment for debt, the plaintiff or plaintiffs shall be liable for
the boarding and jailer’s fees, from the time of the commitment, if the defendant
shall make affidavit that he is unable to support himself; and the sheriff or jailer
may recover the same as debts of similar amount are by law recoverable?
VIII. PETITion FOR LEAVE TO GIVE BOND.
To the Prothonotary of the court of common pleas of Philadelphia county :
THE petition of A. B., respectfully showeth, that your petitioner is now in custody
under an execution (or bail-piece), issued by Magistrate L. M., at the suit of E. F.
That your petitioner has resided in the county of Philadelphia for six months immediately
receding this his application, and prays that he may be permitted, in order to procure
his discharge, to give bond to the plaintiff in said suit, in such amount and with such
security as you may approve, agreeable to the provisions of the act of assembly authorizing
the prothonotaries of the several courts of common pleas of the commonwealth of Penn-
sylvania, to take security and discharge insolvent debtors from arrest.
(Signed) A.B.
C. D., the surety proposed in the above case, being duly sworn, or affirmed, says, that
he is worth (one hundred and eighty) dollars, after payment of all his debts and respon-
sibilities whatsoever. (Signed) Cc. D.
Sworn (or affirmed) and subscribed before me, this lst day of October 1880.
: N. O., Prothonotary.
IX. INSOLVENT BOND.
Kwow all men by these presents, that we, A. B. and C. D., No. 118 Arch street, cur-
riers, are held and firmly bound unto E. F., in the sum of one hundred and eighty dollars,
lawful money of the United States of America, to be paid to the said E. F., his executors,
administrators or assigns ; for which payment well and truly to be made, we do bind
ourselves, our heirs, executors and administrators, jointly and severally, firmly by these
presents. Sealed with our seals, dated the first day of October, in the year of our Lord
one thousand eight hundred and eighty. i ne
Whereas, the above-bounden A. B. hath been arrested on an execution (or bail-piece),
at the suit of the said E. F., for the sum of ninety dollars and six cents, besides costs ;
and the said A. B. hath made application to the prothonotary of the court of common pleas
of the county of Philadelphia, to give bond, with sufficient security, to comply with the
provisions of the act of the general assembly of the commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
cents per diem, asto Blair and Washington
‘counties. Pamph. 690. By act 24 March 1858,
the sheriff of Lycoming is to receive thirty-five
cents per diem for each prisoner. Pamph. 143.
By act 26 March 1860, the sheriff of Warren
county may charge $2.25 per week. Pamph. 262.
By act 2 March 1866, the sheriff of Union county
is to receive 50 cents per diem, Pamph. 129; the
sheriffs of Northampton, Fayette and Carbon, by
act 14 February 1867, Pamph. 199; the sheriff of
Bucks by act 20 February 1873, Pamph. 139; and
the sheriff of Wyoming, by act 24 February 1873.
Pamph. 154, By act 9 April 1867, the sheriff of
Luzerne county may charge 55 cents per day.
Pamph. 950. And by act 23 April 1872, the
sheriff of Venango county may charge 40 cents
per day. Pamph, 527. Sce act 16 March 1866,
as to the counties of Mercer, Erie, Perry, Frank-
lin, Susquehanna and Bradford, Pamph. 211;
and act 30 March 1866, as to Lawrence and
Clarion counties. Pamph. 397. ;
1 One imprisoned for damages in tort, is not
within the act. 6 Penn. St. 445.
2 Such discharge cannot be impeached collate
erally. 8S. & R. 361-3.
3 Act 26 March 1814 219. Purd. 1026.
4 Act 30 March 1833 $1. Ibid. 1027.
5 Act 16 Jnly 1842 3 11. Ibid.
560 INSOLVENT LAWS.
passed the sixteenth day of June, one thousand eight hundred and thirty-six, entitled
‘an act relating to insolvent debtors ; and the said prothonotary hath approved of the
above named ©. D. as security for the said A. B.:
Now, the condition of the above obligation is such, that if the said A. B. shall appear
at the next term of the court of common pleas of the said county, and then and there
present his petition for the benefit of the insolvent laws of this commonwealth, and com-
ply with all the requisitions of the said law, and abide all the orders of the said court in
that behalf, or in default thereof, and if he fail in obtaining his discharge as an insolvent
debtor, that he shall surrender himself to the jail of the said county ; then this obligation
to be void, otherwise to be and remain in full force and virtue.
Sealed and delivered in the presence of G. H. and J. J. K. A. B. SEAL.
Cc. D. SEAL.
X. PETITION FOR DISCHARGE AS AN INSOLVENT DEBTOR.
To the Honorable the Judges of the court of common pleas of Philadelphia county:
The petition of A. B. respectfully showeth, that your petitioner is unable to pay and
satisfy his just debts, and, therefore is compelled to apply to this honorable court for the
relief provided for insolvent debtors, by the existing laws of the commonwealth of*Penn-
sylvania; that your petitioner has resided within the county of Philadelphia six months
immediately preceding this his application, and is now willing and offers to deliver up to
the use of his creditors, all the estate, effects and property of him the said petitioner,
wheresoever situate, and of whatsoever kind ; a statement whereof on oath (or affirmation),
and a statement of the debts due by him, containing the names of his creditors, the
amount due to each, and the nature or character of the debts, so far as he can ascertain
the same, together with a statement of the causes of his insolvency, and of the extent of
his losses, accompanies and is exhibited with this petition. Your petitioner, therefore,
prays the court to grant him the relief provided for insolvent debtors by the laws of the
said commonwealth. (Signed) A. B.
A. B., the above-named petitioner, being duly sworn (or affirmed) according to law,
saith, that the facts set forth in the above petition and in the accompanying statements
are true, to the best of his knowledge and belief. (Signed) A. B.
Sworn (or affirmed) and subscribed before me, this first day of November, a. p. 1880.
(Signed) P. Q., Magistrate.
Statement of all the estate, effects and property of the within-named Petitioner,
wheresoever situate and of whatsoever kind.
Rzau Esrats.—One three-story brick house, situate at No. 816 South Third street,
an of Philadelphia, 16 feet front by 50 feet deep, upon which there is a mortgage of
Personal Estare.—Six shares of stock in the United States Bank ; $180 in money
deposited in the Schuylkill Bank; four beds, bedstead and bedding, one sideboard, six
chairs, three tables, one looking-glass, one stove, one carpet ; also the necessary kitchen
and cooking utensils, valued at about $10 ; also the necessary tools of his trade (carpenter)
valued at $50.! :
Debts due Petstisrer.
L. P. $ 80 00
H. R. 615 00
P. Q. 318 00
N. H. MA oo 3 50
(Signed) A. B.
For a valuable consideration, I hereby assign, transfer and set over, unto P. R. & Co.,
and T. W., their heirs and assigns, all my estate, effects and property whatsoever, and
wheresoever, to which Iam in any manner entitled, for the use of all my creditors. Wit
ness my hand and seal, this 18th day of December, a. pv. 1880.
Signed A. B. :
Witnesses present : et ee
TAs Q.
_ 1 If an assignment or bill of sale be made, it the instrument in the petition, together with an
is necessary to state the fact and file a copy of inventory or schedule of the property assigned.
INSOLVENT LAWS. 561
Statenent of the debts due by the within-named Petitioner, containing the names of his
creditors, the amount due to each, and the nature or character of the debts, so far us
he can ascertain the same.
EF Judgment and bond filed, . : 7 . - $90 00
P. R. & Co. Do. . : . : e “igh 6G . - 618 00
S. L. Note, . ‘ ‘ ie é . 11400
T.S. é - Book-account, . é “ : é 39 00
L. T. D. 5 . Rent, : ‘ . he 8 68 00
Dr. 8. S. P. - Medical attendance, : : 5 - - 5600
J. R., Esq. . Professional services, : ‘ : . - 1000
L.G.T.. - Claim disputed, . : . a - about 318 00
J. Well, . Indorsement of note . . : . 3 . 150 00
T. W. Money borrowed, ji , . ' : - 527 00
Statement of the causes of the within-named Petitioner’s insolvency, and of the
extent of his losses.
Your petitioner commenced business in January 1876, upon a borrowed capital of
$527 ; from that time until the present period, he has met with a succession of disasters,
which, together with a want of sufficient business, has compelled him to apply to your
honorable court for relief. He computes his loss to be as follows: loss by fire in March
last about $300 ; loss upon contracting to build houses at certain prices, which he could
not perform without expending a greater sum, about $200; and loss by non-payment of
debts, good and had, about $1016.50. Your petitioner also has a family to support, which
has been afflicted with considerable sickness. (Signed) A. B.
XI. For or norice.
Philadelphia, November 2, 1880.
Take notice, that I have applied to the honorable judge of the court of common pleas
for the city and county of Philadelphia, for the benefit of the insolvent laws of the com-
wealth of Pennsylvania, and they have appointed [Wednesday] the 18th day of November
inst., at 10 o’clock, a. m., to hear me and my creditors, at the county court-house, corner
Sixth and Chestnut streets, in the said city of Philadelphia—when and where you may
attend, if you think proper. Yours, &c., A. B.
To E. F.
Nore.—By a regulation of the court of common pleas in Philadelphia, this notice must
be published in two daily papers seven times, and the newspapers filed in the office of the
prothonotary two days before the day of hearing; and if the notice be personal, it is
requisite it be served on the creditor personally, or left at hisdwelling-house. An affidavit
must be made by the person who served the notices, giving a copy of the notice, and a
statement of the time and manner in which each notice was served, and the proof must
be filed in the prothonotary’s office two days before the hearing. The notices cannot be
served by the petitioner himself.
XII. Form oF AN INSOLVENT’S DISCHARGE.
PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, ss.
Br IT REMEMBERED, that at a court of common pleas held in Philadelphia, for
the city and county of Philadelphia, in the commonwealth of Pennsylvania, in
[szau.] the term of September, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and
eighty, upon the petition of A. B. to the judges of the same court for relief as
an insolvent debtor, agreeable to the acts of assembly of this commonwealth ;
it was ordered by the said court that he give notice to his respective creditors to appear at
the court-house in the said city, on the eighteenth day of November then next, to show
cause, if any they had, why he should not receive the benefit of the provisions of the said
acts of assembly; and he having appeared before the said court on the eighteenth day of
November, pursuant to the order of the said court, and it appearing that he had given
public notice in the North American and Philadelphia Inquirer (or personal notice), to
the several creditors of the said petitioner mentioned and marked in the list exhibited
with the said petition [if the notice is personal, it is imperative that a list of the
creditors be here subjoined; if public, itis not necessary], notifying the said creditors
of the time and place appointed by the said court for proceeding upon the said petition ;
and the court having examined into the matter of the said petition, and no cause being
shown why the prayer of the petitioner should not be granted, he took the oath prescribed
by law for the relief of insolvent debtors ; and he having made an assignment of all his
estate, real and personal, in trust for the use and benefit of all his creditors, to P. R. &
Co. and T. W., he the said A. B. was discharged; and it was thereupon ordered by the
said court that the said petitioner shall not at any time thereafter be liable to imprison-
ment by reason of any judgment or decree obtained for payment of money only, or for
any debt, damage, costs, sum or sums of money, contracted, accrued, occasioned, owing
or becoming due before the time of such assignment. In testimony whereof, I have here-
unto set mv hand and affixed the seal of the said court, at Philadelphia, the 18th day of
Tred and eighty.
a RP ae eB ts
562
Itnstalinents.
On a covenant or promise to pay a sum of money by instalments, and action of
covenant, on asswmpsit, will lie, immediately, on the non-payment of the first instal.
ment." So, if money be awarded to be paid at different days, assumpsit will lie, on
the award, for each sum, as tt becomes due, and the plaintiff shall recover damages
accordingly ; and when another sum of the money awarded shall become due, the
laintiff may commence a new action for that also; and so on ¢oties quoties [ until
all the debt is recovered ].?
A promissory note, payable by instalments, is negotiable; and the indorser is
entitled to a presentment upon the last day of grace after each day of payment, and
to notice, if such particular instalment be not paid when due.* But, it seems, that
laches as to one instalment, in ordinary cases, only discharges an indorser as to
that one. And that a note payable by instalments cannot be indorsed over for less
than the entire sum due upon it.’
A note payable by instalments is negotiable, within the statute, although it con-
tain a provision that on failure of payment of one instalment, the whole debt is to
become payable. On a promissory note payable by instalments, an action of debt
will not lie till the last day of payment be past. But if a note be payable by
instalments, on the face of it, an action of asswmpsit lies for each instalment. If,
however, the note be payable by instalments, but not on the face of it, only one
action of assumpsit lies; and though in such case a confession of judgment be taken
for the amount of the first instalment, the note is discharged.”
Luguraitcee.
I. Embezzlement by officers and agents. VI. Doing business for unauthorized foreign
II. Issue of policies by unauthorized persons. companies.
III. Insurance brokers and agents. VII. Advertising as agents for unauthorized
IV. False representations to obtain life in- companies.
surance, VIII. Discrimination forbidden.
V. Foreign insurance companies. IX. Authorities.
J. Act 11 Apri 1862. Purd. 1041.
Sscr. 1. If any director, officer, agent or other person connected with, or doing
business for, or with any of said companies, shall fraudulently embezzle or appro-
priate to his own use, or the use of any other person or persons, any money or other
property belonging to the said institution, or left with or held by the said company,
in trust, as a special deposit or otherwise, he or they, on conviction thereof, shali
be fined in a sum not less than the amount so appropriated or embezzled, and
sentenced to undergo an imprisonment in the penitentiary, in separate and solitary
confinement, at labor, for a term not exceeding five years, at the discretion of the
court: Provided, That this shall not prevent any person aggrieved from pursuing
his, her or their civil remedy against such person or persons.
II. Aor 4 Fesruary 1870. Purd. 1059,
Sect. 1. It shall be unlawful for any person, partnership or association, to issue,
sign, seal, or in any manner execute, any policy of insurance, contract or guarantee,
against loss by fire or lightning, without authority expressly conferred by a charter
of incorporation, given according to law; and every such policy, contract or
guarantee, hereafter made, executed or issued, shall be void.
Szor. 2, Any person offending against the provisions of this act, or any person
who shall make, execute or issue any policy of insurance, contract or guarantee,
: oe ue on 5 12M.& W. 139.
aund. 7 OLA. Bly 647,
311M. & W. 374, 710. & M. 487. 1M. & Rah 9A8
« Byles on Bills 5.
INSURANCE. 563
against loss by fire or lightning, without being so authorized by law, shall be
deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof, shall pay a fine, not
exceeding two hundred dollars, to the commonwealth, and the costs of prosecution :
one-half of said fine shall be for the use of the informer: Provided, That nothing
herein contained shall apply to any insurance company authorized by the laws of
any other state to issue policies and effect insurance against loss by fire or light-
ning, which shall have complied with the laws of this commonwealth with respect
to foreign insurance companies.!
III. Aor 1 May 1876. Purd. 1041.
Scr. 44. No person shall act as an insurance broker, until he has procured a
certificate of authority so to act from the insurance commissioner. Such certificate
shall authorize the person named therein to negotiate contracts of insurance, or
place risks, or effect insurance, with any insurance company established in this
commonwealth, or its agents, and with the agents of any insurance company not
incorporated in this commonwealth, which is duly authorized to do business
therein.
Szor. 46. Any person transacting business as an insurance broker within this
commonwealth, without a certificate of authority, as aforesaid, shall be guilty of a
misdemeanor ; and upon conviction thereof, shall be sentenced to pay a fine of
three hundred dollars. The person or persons upon whose complaint such con-
viction is had, shall receive one-half of the fine so paid, provided the insurance
commissiouer or his deputy is not the complainant.
Szcor. 47. Any person transacting business within this commonwealth, as the
agent of an insurance company of any other state or government, without a certifi-
eate of authority, as required by the act to which this is a supplement, shall be
guilty of a misdemeanor; and upon conviction thereof, shall be sentenced to pay
a fine of five hundred dollars; but this section shall not be held to prevent the
insurance commissioner from pursuing the remedy or remedies provided in the act
aforesaid. The person or persons upon whose complaint such conviction is had,
shall receive one-half of the fines so paid, provided the insurance commissioner or
his deputy is not the complainant.
IV. Act 10 June 1881. Purd. 514.
Scr. 1. Any agent of a mutual, stock or co-operative life-insurance company or
association, physician or other person whatsoever, who shall knowingly make, or be
concerned or interested in making, any misrepresentation or false statement for the
purpose of securing from any mutual, stock or co-operative life-insurance company
or association, a policy of insurance or certificate of membership upon his own life,
or the life of any other person, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon convic-
tion thereof be fined not exceeding one thousand dollars, or undergo imprisonment
not exceeding one year, or both, in the discretion of the court.
V. Aot 5 June 1883. Purd. 1058.
Sxot. 7. If any officer, agent or employee of any corporation or association,
[organized under the laws of any other state or government to insure lives on the
assessment plan, or any corporation carrying on the business of life or accident
insurance on the assessment plan], shall do business in this state, or assist in or
knowingly permit the same, unless such corporation or association has complied with
the provisions of the laws of this state applicable to the same, he shall be deemed
and held guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof, shall be fined not
more than five hundred dollars, nor less than fifty dollars, or imprisoned in the
county jail not more than ninety days, or less than thirty, or both.
VI. Act 22 Apri. 1887. Purd. 514.
Any person or persons, or any agent, officer, or member of any corporation paying
or receiving or forwarding any premiums, applications for insurance, or in any manner
1 This act is constitutional. Commonwealth v. Vrooman, 35 W. N. C. 97.
564 INSURANCE.
securing, helping or aiding in the placing of any insurance, or effecting any contracts
of insurance upon property within this commonwealth, directly or indirectly, with any
insurance company or association not of this state, and which has not been authorized
to do business in this state under the terms of this act, shall be guilty of a misde-
meanor, and on conviction thereof, shall be sentenced to a fine of not less than one
hundred dollars, nor more than one thousand dollars, and upon conviction of a second
offence, shall be sentenced to pay alike fine and undergo an imprisonment not ex-
ceeding one year, or either, in the discretion of the court.
VIL Acr 10 May 1893. Purd. 514.
Sror. 1. Any person or persons representing or advertising himself or themselves as
the agent or agents of any insurance company of any other state or government, which
has not complied with the laws of this state by poster, circular letter or in any
other way or manner, shall be deemed to be guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon con-
viction, shall be sentenced to pay a fine of not more than one thousand dollars, at the
discretion of the court.
Sxcr, 2. Any person or persons representing or advertising himself or themselves
as the agent or agents of any fictitious or spurious insurance company by poster, circu-
lar letter or.in any other way or manner, shall be deemed to be guilty of a misde-
meanor, and on conviction, shall be sentenced to pay a fine of not more than five
hundred dollars, and undergo imprisonment not more than three years, at the discre-
tion of the court.
VIII. Act 7 May 1889. Purd. 514.
Scr. 1. No life-insurance company doing business in Pennsylvania shall make or
permit any distinction or discrimination in favor of individuals, between insurants of
the same class and equal expectation of life, in the amount or payment of premiums .
or rates charged for policies of life or endowment insurance, or in the dividends or
other benefits payable thereon, or in any other of the terms and conditions of the
contracts it makes, nor shall any such company or agent thereof make any contract of
insurance, or agreement as to such contract, other than as plainly expressed in the
policy issued thereon, nor shall any such company or agent pay or allow or offer to
pay or allow, as inducements to insurance, any rebate of premium payable on the
policy, or any special favor or advantage in the dividends or other benefit to accrue
thereon, or any valuable consideration or inducement whatever, not specified in the
policy contract of insurance.
Sect. 2. Any life-insurance company, its agent or agents, violating section one of
this act, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof, the offender
or offenders shall be sentenced to pay a fine of five hundred dollars on each and every
violation where the amount of insurance is twenty-five thousand dollars or less, and
for every additional twenty-five thousand dollars insurance or less there shall be an
additional penalty of five hundred dollars.
TX. Policies of insurance against fire are contracts of indemnity; and if the insured
part with his interest in the property, before the loss, it discharges the insurer. The
policies are not deemed in their nature, incidents to the property insured, but are
mere special agreements with the persons insuring against such loss or damage as
they may sustain.”
The application is not to be deemed a portion of the contract, though referred to
in the policy, unless it shall contain or have attached thereto, a correct copy of such
application, as signed by the insured, with a reference to the by-laws of the insurer.*
Assignees may sue in their own names for their interest in a policy of insurance, upon
the happening of a loss. Otherwise, where there is an express provision in the
12 Cliff. 266. 2N. Y, 210, $ Act 11 May 1881. Purd. 1046.
216 Pet. 495. * Act 14 March 1873. Ibid. 1048.
INTELLIGENCE OFFICES. 565
policy that it shall not be assigned, without the assent of the company, and such
assent has not been given.? :
A policy of insurance is a protection against fire arising from the negligence of the
insured, unless it amount to fraud.
The act 16 April 1891 (Purd. 1047) provides for uniform forms for policies of fire
insurance.
Intelliqence Offices.
Act 25 May 1883. Purd. 1062.
Sror. 1. It shall not be lawful for any person or persons to keep open, or estab-
lish, any intelligence or employment office, for the purpose of procuring or obtaining,
for money or other valuable consideration, any work, employment or occupation for
persons seeking the same, or to otherwise engage in the business of procuring em-
ployment for others, for money or other valuable consideration, in any city of the
first class in this commonwealth, without first having obtained from the treasurer
of the city, in which such office is situated, or such business is carried on, a licence
so to do, and having paid therefor to the treasurer of the said city in which such
office is situated, or business carried on, such sum of money as is hereinafter speci-
fied.
Scr. 2. Every person applying for a licence under this act shall pay to the city
treasurer, as aforesaid, an annual licence fee of fifty dollars, and upon payment of
said sum of money, shall be entitled to receive a certificate, signed by the said city
treasurer, setting forth that the licence fee has been paid, and that such applicant
has been licensed to pursue the business of an employment agent, for the period of
one year from the date of said certificate; said licence fee to be paid to the said
city treasurer the first day of June, in each year. And it shall be the duty of any
person obtaining said certifieate or licence, to keep said certificate or licence publicly
exposed to view, in the office used by him for carrying on said business, with a
printed schedule of the fees to be charged fur his services.
Szcr. 8. If any person, not being licensed as aforesaid, shall engage in the busi-
ness of’ an employment agent, or in any way act as a broker between employer and
employee, and take money or other valuable consideration for such services, or if
any person being so licensed shall refuse to exhibit his certificate or licence, he shall
be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and on conviction thereof, shall be sentenced
to pay a fine not exceeding one hundred dollars, at the discretion of the court.
Szct. 4. If any person engaged in the employment agent business, and having a
licence as heretofore provided by this act, shall give false information or make false
promises concerning any work or occupation, to any one obtaining his services for
procuring such work or occupation, or shall charge a greater sum for his services
than are provided for in said schedule, he shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor,
and upon conviction thereof, shall forfeit his licence and pay a fine not exceeding
two hundred dollars, and undergo an imprisonment in the county jail of not more
than twelve months, or both or either, at the discretion of the court.
1101 P. P. S. 111. 7 58 Ibid. 419,
‘
[ 566 ]
Jinterest.
I. What is interest, IV. Interest on verdicts and judgments.
IL. The rate of interest, in all the states, &c. VY. Authorities and judicial decisions.
III. Interest in Pennsylvania.
I. Inrerest of money, the legal profits or recompense allowed on loans of money
to be taken from the borrower by the lender. Jacob.
II. The following are the rates of interest in the several states of the Union.
In Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut,
New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, Tennes-
see, Kentucky, Indiana, Iowa and the District of Columbia, six per cent.
In Ohio, Illinois, Missouri and Arkansas, six per cent., and by agreement as high
as ten.
In New York and South Carolina, seven per cent. In Michigan and Wisconsin,
seven per cent., and by agreement as high as ten. In Minnesota, seven per cent.,
and by agreement any amount.
In Georgia, Alabama and Florida, eight per cent. In Mississippi, eight per cent.
for a loan of money; six per cent. on other contracts. In Texas, eight per cent.,
and by agreement as high as twelve.
In California and Oregon, ten per cent., and by agreement any amount.
In Louisiana, five per cent., and by agreement as high as ten.
In Kansas, ten per cent., and by agreement as high as twenty.
III. The lawful rate of interest for the loan or use of money in all cases where
no express contract shall have been made for a less rate, shall be six per cent. per
annum; and the 1st and 2d sections of the act passed 2d March 1723, entitled “an
act to reduce the interest of: money from eight to six per cent. per annum,” are
hereby repealed
When a rate of interest for the loan or use of money exceeding that established
by law shall have been reserved or contracted for, the borrower or debtor shall not
be required to pay the creditor the excess over the legal rate, and it shall be lawful
for such borrower or debtor at his option, to retain and deduct such excess from the
amount of any such debt; and in all cases where any borrower or debtor shall here-
tofore or hereafter have voluntarily paid the whole debt or sum loaned, together
with interest exceeding the lawful rate, no action to recover back any such excess
shall be sustained in any court of this commonwealth, unless the same shall have
been commenced within six months from and after the time of such payment: Pro-
vided always, That nothing in this act shall affect the holders of negotiable paper
taken bond fide in the usual course of business.”
Commission merchants and agents of parties not residing in this commonwealth,
are hereby authorized to enter into an agreement to retain the balances of money
in their hands, and pay on the same a rate of interest not exceeding seven per
centum per annum, and receive a rate of interest not exceeding that amount,
for any advance of money made by them on goods or merchandise consigned to them
for sale or disposal: Provided, That this act shall only apply to moneys received
from or held on account of, and advances made upon goods consigned from importers,
manufacturers and others living and transacting business in places beyond the limits
of the state.
It shall be unlawful for any person or persons, co-partnership, unincorporated asso-
ciation, limited partnership, joint-stock association or corporation whatsoever, in loan-
ing money at interest to any person or persons, whether such loans be secured by bond
and mortgage, or otherwise, to require the person or persons borrowing the same to
pay the tax imposed thereon by the first section of this act; and in all cases where
such tax shall have been paid by the borrower or borrowers, the same shall be deemed
and considered usury, and be subject to the laws governing the same.‘
1 Act 28 May 1858 31. Purd. 1062, 5 Act 21 May 1857 3 1. Purd. 1063.
2 Ibid. 3 2. This act is extended to loansby ¢ Act1 June 1889, Purd. 1968.
banks, by act 23 May 1878. Purd. 1063.
INTEREST. 567
IV. Lawful interest shall be allowed to the creditor for the sum or value he
obtained judgment for, from the time the said judgment was obtained till the tima
of sale, or till satisfaction be made.'
It shall be lawful for any party or parties, in whose favor any verdict may be
rendered for a specific sum of money, to collect and receive interest upon such sum
from the date of the verdict; and every general judgment entered upon such ver-
dict, whether by a court of original jurisdiction, or by the supreme court, shall be
deemed and held to be a judgment for the sum found by the verdict, with interest
thereon from the date of such finding: Provided, That nothing in this act con-
tained shall prevent any court from directing special verdicts, or entering special
judgments, whenever the same shall be deemed just and proper.?
V. Interest is an incident of every judgment in Pennsylvania;® to a decree of
the orphans’ court ;* and to an award from the date of its entry.
The rule of law is, that interest is allowed on goods sold and delivered, and on
‘all open accounts, where by the usual course of dealing, or by express agreement,
a certain time is fixed for payment; on money lent and advanced, for work and
labor done; on arrears of rent, unless it would be inferred by the landlord’s con-
duct that he did not mean to insist upon it, or he demand more than is due, or
there be other special circumstances, which might make the charge of interest
improper; and, generally, whenever one person detains the money of another
without any right, and against his consent. Money lent bears interest without any
express agreement.’ By the custom of Pennsylvania, a book-account for goods sold,
bears interest from the end of six months after the sale and delivery.®
Where there is no usage, nor precise time of payment, no account rendered, nor
demand made, it is for the jury [or the justice] to give interest, by way of damages,
for the delay, at their discretion, under all the circumstances of the case.®
No interest is allowed on an unsettled account, unless the party claiming interest
bring himself within one of the recognised exceptions to the rule.° A bill payable
on demand carries interest only from the time of demand."
Where money is received, as well as paid in a mistake, and neither fraud nor
surprise, nor suppressio vert [suppression of the truth], nor suggestio falsi (false
suggestion], can be imputed to either party, interest shall not be allowed, in an
action to recover the money back. In the case of promissory notes, where a day
certain is fixed for payment, interest is allowed from the day of payment; and
where no day is fixed, it is payable from the time of demand.”
The debtor is not exempted from the payment of interest by the continued
absence of the creditor, at a distance from the state, and his not being heard of for
many years.’ A factor or agent, who does not with due diligence remit the money
of his principal, is chargeable with interest.%*
Arrears of ground-rent, in a personal action, bear interest from, the time they fall
due ; but not where recourse is had tothe land.* An assignee of the grantee ought
not to be charged with interest in arrear, which accrued prior to the conveyance
to him; but on subsequent arrears he is liable for interest.”
Where sums have been received by administrators, after the expiration of a year,
interest is not chargeable from the day they were received, but the court will allow
six months from those times respectively, before the charge of interest is to com-
mence.®
A tender of the sum due does not amount to an actual payment and discharge ;
but it suspends the interest until a subsequent demand and refusal.* In cases where
interest is not of course, but depends on the conduct of the parties, if the defendant
1 Act of 1700. Purd. 1063, 10 29 Penn. St. 360.
2 Act 6 April 185931, Ibid. 1064. 1116S. & R. 264. Add. 137.
8 4 Dall. 252. 6 Binn, 437. 8S.&R.452. 5 11 Dall. 52. And see 44 Penn. St. 63.
Whart. 280. 5 W. 464. 6 Ibid. 53. 1389S. & R. 263.
#16 Penn. St. 151. 14] Dall. 343.
5 28 Ibid. 211. 16 4 Whart. 516.
8 1 Dall. 315, 349. 2 Ibid. 193. 4 Ibid. 289. 16 2 Binn. 146. 2 Penn. St. 97.
6 Binn. 162, 15S. & R. 176. 17 33 Penn. St. 435. And see 4 Phila. 186.
7 84 Penn. St. 426. 18 1 Ash. 305. See ll Leg. Int. 37. 2 Am. L.
8 30 Ibid. 346. Reg. 448.
9128. & RB. 393. 19-1 Dall. 407.
568 INTEREST.
before suit offer to pay as much as is due, and the plaintiff refuse to receive it, the
defendant is not liable to pay interest. But if the plaintiff insist on too much, and
the defendant offer too little, there is a necessity for the suit, and the defendant
must pay interest.’
It has been held, that where the condition of a bond was for the payment of
interest annually, and the principal at a distant day, the interest might be re-
covered before the principal was due, by an action of debt on the bond.
If a party accept the principal of his debt, he cannot afterwards sue for
the interest. Where a balance of an account is paid, without any charge of interest,
interest cannot afterwards be demanded.*
Money paid on account of a bond should first be applied to the discharge of the
interest due, and the residue credited towards the satisfaction of the principal.®
Bond dated in 1830, conditioned for the payment of money on the Ist of April
1832, with three per cent. interest from the date ; the plaintiff is entitled to recover
interest at three per cent. until the time of payment, and after that, legal interest at
the rate of six per cent.
Interest must be paid according to the law of the country where the debt was
contracted, and not according to that where the debt is sued for." A practice, by a
storekeeper, to balance his books at the end of each year, and charge interest on
the balance of a running account upon which there has been no settlement, is
illegal® Where a note is made payable, in a certain number of years, with interest
annually, only simple interest can be recovered on the principal sum.®
Although interest upon interest is, in general unlawful, yet there are cases in
which interest is considered as changed into principal, and permitted to carry
interest ; as where a settlement of accounts takes place after interest has become
due, or an agreement is made after it becomes due, that it shall carry interest.
Any agreement for interest upon interest, to be lawful, must be made after the
interest has become due, and must be prospective, that the interest then due shall
carry interest. An original agreement, that if the interest is not paid at the time
it shall be due, it shall carry interest, though it would not amount to usury, so as
to render the contract connected with it illegal and void, yet the party cannot
recover such interest, either at law or in equity.’
Compound interest may be recovered on an express promise, or one implied by
law as part of the contract. An account made up of principal and interest becomes
one principal debt when settled, the aggregate balance bearing interest. An account
current received and not objected to within a reasonable time, becomes a settled
account, bearing interest from the time it is stated."
Compound interest is not recoverable, unless there has been a settlement between
the parties, or a judgment, whereby the aggregate amount of principal and interest
due is turned into a new principal ; or where there is a special agreement to do so,
in such form as to be valid. Interest is never a legal incident to the non-payment
of interest.
.
1 3 Binn. 295. 253. 3 Johns. Ch. 587.
2 1 Ibid. 152. 8 16S. & R. 257.
3 3 Johns. 229. 9 8 Mass. 453.
* 3 Johns. Ch. 587. 104 Y. 220. 78. &R.15. 11 Ves. Jr. 93
5 1 Dall. 378. 88. &R.452. 8W.&S.17. 11 Bald. 636. 70 Penn. St.183. 2 Clark 148,
65W.& S. 51. 12 Phila. 131. And see 15 Ibid. 599.
™ 4 Johns. 183. 2 W. & S. 327. 2 W.C.C. 12 34 Penn. St. 210.
[ 569 ]
Hails,
Ir is thought that the following authorities, without the acts on the subject, will
be sufficient for the magistracy. The acts in relation to jails, in Pennsylvania, are
so numerous and so voluminous, that their insertion (with the exception of the fol-
lowing sections of the revised Penal Code and of the Code of Criminal Procedure),
would exclude other matter more essential to accomplish the ends contemplated by
this publication. So humane, judicious and well-conducted have been our peniten-
tiaries, that our system and regulations on the subject have commanded not only
the attention and approbation of the civilized world, but they have been adopted,
even to the plan of our prisons and their regulations, by the governments of Great
Britain, France, Russia, Prussia and the greater part of Germany.
It is somewhat foreign to the object of this publication, yet the following is a
circumstance of so extraordinary a nature, that we think its publication here will
be excused :—
In the summer of 1842, a well-dressed young Englishman (the name is of
no moment), applied to the chief magistrate of Philadelphia to be committed, for some
months, to the county prison of Moyamensing. This request was not granted, there
being no complaint against the person making the application. The applicant, how-
ever, was not thus to be put aside. He threatened to commit a breach of the peace,
and refusing to give bail, was committed to the county prison. At his own request,
he was put into a cell or room, and a loom was given him, in which he worked for
about twenty months, submitting in all things, as to food, raimant, exercise and
labor, to the discipline of the prison; he then gave bail, and was discharged. He
was permitted to have a memoranda book and pencil, with which he made such
notes as he pleased, and took the book with him, when he finally left the prison.
Various were the conjectures as to the motives of this individual, but of them
nothing certain was ever ascertained. His conduct was exemplary; we made
frequent inquiries, but never heard of his murmuring or complaining. He became
an excellent weaver. It was understood, that on his liberation he returned to
Great Britain.
Act 31 Maron 1860. Purd. 563.
Szcr. 181. Where any pergon hath been, or shall be convicted of any felony, not
punishable with death, or any misdemeanor punishable with imprisonment at labor,
and hath endured, or shall endure the punishment to which such offender hath been
or shall be adjudged for the same, the punishment so endured shall have the like
effects and consequences asa pardon by the governor, as to the felony or misde-
meanor whereof such person was so convicted : Provided, That nothing herein eon-
tained, nor the enduring of such punishment, shall prevent or mitigate any punish-
ment which the offender might otherwise be lawfully sentenced on a subsequent
conviction for any other felony or misdemeanor; and that the provisions of this
section shall not extend to the case of a party convicted of wilful and corrupt
perjury.
Sxcr. 182. If any person who has been convicted of any offence, other than
murder of the second degree, for which the punishment prescribed by this code is
imprisonment by separate or solitary confinement at labor, shall, after such convic-
tion, be guilty of a similar offence, or of any offence for which such punishment is
directed, he shall in either case, upon conviction, be sentenced to undergo an .im-
prisonment, and be kept at labor not exceeding double the whole period of time
which may, by the penal laws of this commonwealth, be prescribed for the crime
of which he is convicted! :
Aot 31 Marca 1860. Purd. 561.
Sror. 74, Whenever any person shall be sentenced to imprisonment at Jabor by
separate or solitary confinement, for any period not less than one year, the imprison-
ment and labor shall be had and performed in the state penitentiary for the proper
1Purd AAT
570 JAILS.
district: Provided, That nothing in this section contained shall prevent such person
from being sentenced to imprisonment and labor, by separate or solitary confinement,
in the county prisons now or hereafter authorized by law to receive convicts of a
like description: And provided also, That no convict shall be sentenced by any
court of this commonwealth, to either of the penitentiaries thereof, for any term
which shall expire between the fifteenth of November and the fifteenth of February
of any year.
Sect. 75. No person shall be sentenced to imprisonment at labor, by separate or
solitary confinement, for a period of time less than one year, except in the counties
where, in the opinion of the court pronouncing the sentence, suitable prisons have
been erected for such confinement and Jabor; and all persons sentenced to simple
imprisonment, for any period of time, shall be confined in the county jail where the
conviction shall take place: Provided, That in the counties where suitable prisons
for separate or solitary confinement at labor do not exist, and the sentence shall
be for less than one year, simple imprisonment shall be substituted in all cases for
the separate and solitary confinement at labor required by the ‘“‘act to consolidate,
revise and amend the penal laws of this commonwealth.””
A jailer is punishable for barbarously misusing his prisoners.? So overseers of
the poor, for misusing paupers, as by lodging them in unwholesome apartments,’ or
by exacting labor from such as are unfit to work.
A person arrested upon a warrant issued by a justice of the peace of another
county, and indorsed in the county where he is found, if the offence be bailable,
may, at his option, give bail in the county where he is arrested for his appearance
at the court where the offence is triable ; but if he fail to do so, he cannot be com-
mitted to the jail of the county where he is found; he must be committed to the jail
of the county where the offence is triable.‘
The 74th and 75th sections of the Code of Criminal Procedure, taken together,
require: 1. That all persons sentenced to simple imprisonment, shall be confined in
the county where the offender is convicted. 2. That no person shall be sentenced
to imprisonment at labor by separate or solitary confinement for a less period than
one year, except in the counties where, in the opinion of the court passing the sen-
tence, prisons are provided suitable for such confinement and labor. 3. That all
imprisonment at labor by separate or solitary confinement, where the sentences
exceed one year, shall be in the state penitentiary for the proper district, except in
the counties in whose prisons convicts of a like description are authorized to be
imprisoned, and in those counties, such convicts may be sent to the county prisons
as heretofore.
In New York, it has been held, that a similar provision to that contained in the
last proviso to the 74th section, was directory merely, and that a failure to comply
with its requirements did not avoid the sentence.®
A prison is intended as a place of punishment; but such is the mawkish senti-
mentality of modern legislation, that prisoners may now be allowed the use of
tobacco, and be furnished with the daily papers.”
1 Purd. 562. Hawk P. C. 93. 5 Report on the Penal Code 54.
2 Cald, 432. 61 Park. 374,
3 Thid. 76. T Acts 16 April 1866 and 8 May 1876. Purd.
41 Gr. 220. 1665.
[ 571 J
Hoint-Stock Companies.
I. Acts of assembly. i II. Judicial decisions.
I. Act 2 June 1874. Purd. 1086.
Szot. 1, When any three or more persons may desire to form a partnership
association, for the purpose of conducting any lawful business or occupation, within
the United States or elsewhere, whose principal office or place of business shall be
established and maintained within this state, by subscribing and contributing
capital thereto, which capital shall alone be liable for the debts of such associa-
tion, it shall and may be lawful for such persons to sign and acknowledge,
before some officer competent to take the acknowledgment of deeds, a statement,
in writing, in which shall be set forth the full names of such persons, and the
amount of capital of said association subscribed for by each; the total amount of
capital, and when and how to be paid; the character of the business to be con-
ducted and the location of the same; the name of the association, with the word
“ limited ” added thereto as part of the same; the contemplated duration of said
association, which shall not in any case exceed twenty years, and the names of
the officers of said association, selected in conformity with the provisions of this
act. And any amendment of said statement shall be made only in like manner;
which said statement and amendments shall be recorded in the office of the
recorder of deeds of the proper county.
Szor. 2. The members of any such partnership association shall not be liable
under any judgment, decree or order which shall be obtained against such associa-
tion, or for any debt or engagement of such company, further or otherwise than is
hereinafter provided ; that is to say, if any execution, sequestration or other pro-
cess in the nature of execution, either at law or in equity, shall have been issued
against the property or effects of the company, and if there cannot be found suffi-
cient thereof, whereon to levy or enforce such execution, sequestration or other
process, then such execution, sequestration or other process may be issued against
any of the members, to the extent of the portions of their subscriptions, respect-
ively, in the capital of the association, not then paid up: Provided always, That
no such execution shall issue against any member, except upon an order of court,
or of a judge of the court in which the action, suit or other proceeding shall
have been brought or instituted; and the said court or judge may compel the
production of the books of the association, showing the names of the members
thereof and the amount of capital remaining to be paid upon their respective sub-
scriptions, and from them, or other sources of information, ascertain the truth in
regard thereto, and may order execution to issue accordingly ; and the said asso-
ciation shall be and it is hereby required to keep a subscription-list book for that
purpose, and the same shall be open to inspection by the creditors and members of
the association at all reasonable times.
Sect. 3. The word ‘ limited ” shall be the last word of the name of every partner-
ship association, formed under the provisions of this act; and every such associa-
tion shall paint or affix, and shall keep painted or affixed, its name on the outside
of every office or place in which the business of the association is carried on, in
a conspicuous position, in letters easily legible ; and shall have its full name men-
tioned in legible characters in all notices, advertisements and other official publica-
tions of such association, and in all bills of exchange, promissory notes, checks,
orders for money, bills of lading, invoices, receipts, letters and other writings
used in the transaction of the business of the partnership association : Provided,
That the omission of the word “limited” in the use of the name of the partner-
ship association, shall render each and every person participant in such omission,
or knowingly acquiescing therein. liable for any indebtedness, damage or liability
arising therefrom.
Sor. 4. Interests in such partnership associations shall be personal estate, and
may be transferred, given, bequeathed, distributed, sold or assigned, under such
572 JOINT-STOCK COMPANIES.
rules and regulations as such partnership associations shall, from time to time, pre-
scribe by a vote of a majority of the members in number and value of their interests ;
and in the absence of such rules and regulations, the transferree of any interest in any
such association shall not be entitled to any participation in the subsequent business of
such association, unless elected to membership therein, by a vote of a majority of the
members in number and value of their interests. And any change of ownership,
whether by sale, death, bankruptcy or otherwise, which occurs in the absence of any
rules and regulations of such associations regulating such transfer, and which is not
followed by election to membership in such associations, shall entitle the owner or
transferree only to the value of the interest so acquired at the date of acquiring such
interest, at a price and upon terms to be mutually agreed upon, and in default of such
agreement, at a price and upon terms to be fixed by an appraiser to be appointed by
the court of common pleas of the proper county, on the petition of either party, which
appraisement shall be subject to the approval of said court."
Sor. 5. There shall be at least one meeting of the members of the association in each
year; at one of the meetings there shall be elected not less than three nor more than five
managers of the association, one of whom shall be the chairman, one the treasurer
and one the secretary, or the offices of both treasurer and secretary may be filled by
one person, who shall hold their respective offices one year and until their successors
are duly installed. The board of managers are authorized to fix the salary and com-
pensation of such officers and the salary and compensation of other employés, but the
president, secretary and treasurer shall not receive, as salary or compensation, after
such association has been in existence for five years, a sum in the aggregate greater
than the amount of net earnings actually earned during the year preceding, unless by
the consent of two-thirds of all the members of the association; and the salary of the
president, secretary and treasurer shall be fixed for the ensuing year by a two-thirds
vote of the value of interest present at the annual meeting of the association, and after
the annual report has been made. No debt shall be contracted or liability incurred for
such association except by one or more of the managers, and no liability greater than
five hundred dollars, except against the person incurring it, shall bind the association,
unless reduced to writing and signed by at least two managers.”
Srct. 6. The association may, from time to time, divide the profits of its business, in
such manner and in such an amount as a majority of its managers may determine,
which profits so divided shall not at any time diminish or impair the capital of the
said association ; and any one consenting to a dividend which shall diminish or impair
the capital, shall be liable to any person or persons interested or injured thereby, to the
amount of such diminution or impairment.
Ssct. 7. It shall not be lawful for such association to loan its credit, its name or its
capital, to any member of said association, and for such loan to any other person or asso-
ciation, the consent in writing of a majority in number and value of interest shall be
requisite.
Sxcr. 8. Such association may be dissolved—
(1.) Whenever the period fixed for the duration of the association expires.
(2.) Whenever, by a vote of a majority in number and value of interest, it shall be
so determined ; and notice of such winding-up shall be given by publication in two news-
papers published in the proper city or county, at least six consecutive times, and imme-
diately upon the commencement of said advertising, said association shall cease to carry
on its business, except so far as may be required for the beneficial winding up thereof.
Scr. 9. When any such - partnership association shall be dissolved by the voluntary
action thereof, its property shall be applied and distributed as follows:
(1.) To the payment of all debts for wages of labor.
(2.) To the satisfaction of its other liabilities and indebtedness.
(3.) After payment thereof, the same shall be distributed to and among the mem-
bers thereof in proportion to their respective interests, in the following manner:
(4.) Three liquidating trustees, not more than two of whom shall have been a man-
ager of the association so dissolved and in liquidation, shall be elected by the members
of the association, who shall have full power to settle the affairs of the association,
and distribute the assets thereof, after the payment of its debts, among the members,
under the direction of the court of common pleas of the proper county.® ,
1 Soamended, by act 25 June1885. Purd. 1087. 8 So amended, by act 10 May 18 3.
2 So amended, by act 10 May 1889. Purd. 1087. ad he ategemraere
JOINT-STOCK COMPANIES. 573
Szcr. 10. No amendment, modification or repeal of this act shall affect anything
duly done, right acquired, liability incurred, or penalty, forfeiture or other punish-
ment incurred, or to be incurred, in respect of any offence against the provi of
this act, before such amendment, modification or repeal comes into operation.
Act 1 May 1876. Purd. 1088.
Secr. 1. It shall and may be lawful for any person desiring to form a partnership
association, under the act to which this is a supplement, to make contribution to
the capital thereof in real or personal estate, mines or other property, at a valua-
tion to be approved by all the members subscribing to the capital of such association :
Provided, That in the statement required to be recorded by the first section of the
said act, subscriptions to the capital, whether in cash or in property, shall be cer-
tified in this respect according to the fact ; and when property has been contributed
as part of the capital, a schedule containing the names of the parties so con-
tributing, with a description and valuation of the property so contributed, shall be
inserted.
Sxct. 3. All real estate owned or purchased by any association heretofore created,
or which may be hereafter created, under and by virtue of the act to which this is
a supplement, shall be held and owned, and conveyance thereof shall be made, in
the association name. Said association shall sue and be sued in their association
name; and when suit is brought against any such association, service thereof
shall be made upon the chairman, secretary or treasurer thereof; which service shall
be as complete and effective as if made upon each and every member of such asso-
ciation.
Aor 10 Junz 1881. Purd 1088.
Sxcr. 1. Any partnership association, organized under the said act and the
several supplements thereto, may, in addition to the methods already authorized, be
served with legal process in any county of this commonwealth where said association
shall maintain and keep an office for the transaction of business, by serving such
process upon any agent, chief or any other clerk, or upon any director or manager
of such association, and such service shall be good and valid in law to all intents
and purposes as service upon such association.
Act 18 Frsruary 1875. Purd 1088.
Scr. 1. Whenever any association, formed under the act to which this is a sup-
plement, shall have occasion to execute any deed of conveyance, or bonds with or
without coupons, and mortgages, to secure purchase or borrowed moneys, such
association shall have a right to adopt and use a common seal, and to acknowledge
such instruments or writings, by their chairman and secretary.
II. A joint-stock company formed under the act of 1874, is a quasi corporation,
and liable to suit as such for a wilful trespass upon the land of another, for the
purpose of mining coal.! And is liable to taxation under the act of 1879, as a
miner of and dealer in coal.2 The limited liability of its members is only
insured by a strict compliance with the terms of the law; a general description, or
lumping of valuable property, contributed as capital, is not such a schedule as is
required by the act of 1876.2 But an omission to comply with the requisites of the
act, does not render the members liable as general partners, to creditors who dealt
with the association as such.*
The purchaser of a share is bound by the by-laws and usages of the company.?
But as between the parties to the transfer, the sale will be valid, though not entered
in the books of the company ; the purchaser’s title will prevail as against an attach-
ing creditor of his vendor. On the death of a shareholder, his executors are enti-
tled to a proportion of the “ good will” of the association.’
The president cannot bind the company by giving a judgment note in favor of
himself and others® And after passing a resolution to wind up, the company has
no power to confess a judgment.®
: 16 a N. C. 355. : 42 Leg. ae au
40 Leg. Int. 272. 8W.N.C.5
8 94 Penn. St. 249. 8 28 Pitts. L. J. 212.
415 W.N. 0.77. 9 1 Del. Co. R. 264.
[ 574 ]
Hudqment.
A JUDGMENT is the sentence of the law, pronounced by the court upon the
matter in the record Judgments are of four sorts: 1. Where the facts are con-
fessed by the parties, and the law determined by the court, as in case of judgment
by demurrer. 2. Where the law is admitted by the parties, and the facts disputed,
as in case of judgment upon a verdict. 3. Where both the fact and the law arising
thereon are admitted by the defendant, which is the case of judgment by confession
or default: or 4. Where the plaintiff is convinced that fact, or law, or both are
insufficient to support his action, and therefore abandons or withdraws his prosecu-
tion, which is the case in judgments upon a nonsuit or retraxit.?
Interlocutory judgments, at law, are such as are given in the middle of a cause,
upon such plea, proceeding or default, which is only intermediate, and does not
finally determine or complete the suit.’
Final judgments are such as at once put an end to the action, by declaring that
the plaintiff has either entitled himself or has not, to recover the remedy he sues
for.*
A judgment in civil cases, before an alderman or justice of the peace, is the
decision of the magistrate on the law and the evidence which has been laid before
him in some dispute or suit; which decision, when entered on the docket of the
justice, is called a judgment. The judgment of the magistrate is given under some
one of the following circumstances :—
1. When, on the return-day of the summons, the defendant appears and the
plaintiff does not, then, at the request of defendant, judgment of nonsuit may be
entered in his favor, with fifty cents for his trouble and loss of time, to be paid by
the plaintiff.
2. When the plaintiff appears and makes out his claim, in the absence of the
defendant, who, notwithstanding he has been duly notified to appear, has neglected
or refused to attend. In such a case, judgment is given for the plaintiff and against
the defendant or defendants, for the amount proved to be due by him or them.
3. When the parties appear, after hearing their proofs and allegations, then the
judgment should be given for whichsoever party, plaintiff or defendant, shall have
made proof of the indebtedness of the other party to the satisfaction of the justice.
4. When the parties appear and the defendant acknowledges his indebtedness to
the plaintiff for the amount he claims, then judgment is given for the amount by
confession.
5. Upon the award of referees, the justice having first duly notified the parties
to appear at his office.
6. When the parties voluntarily appear before the justice, and enter an amicable
action. In this case the judgment is usually, but not always, by confession.
A compulsory nonsuit of a justice, after the parties have appeared before him, is
conclusive of the suit, unless appealed from; for, having no power to enter such a
judgment, it is equivalent to a judgment that the plaintiff has no cause of action.
The judgment of a justice, in a cause of which he has jurisdiction, is conclusive
upon the parties, however erroneous, unless reversed on certiorari or appeal. A
judgment erroneously entered is valid until reversed.’ The validity of a judgment
of a justice of the peace cannot be controverted in a collateral proceeding by a
stranger to it.
It seems, that if two defendants are sued and only one is served with process, and
appears and makes defence, a judgment entered generally is a judgment against
such defendant only.2 When the writ is served upon one of two defendants, and
there is a general appearance by attorney and trial of the cause upon its merits, the
1 3 Bl. Com. 395. 69S. &R.12. 23 Penn. St.189. 4 N.Y. 71.
2 Thid. 396. 728. & BR. 142.
8 Thid. 395. 810 W. 101,
4 Ibid. 398. §2W. & S. 553. But see 95 Penn. St. 435. 29
5 2 Penn. St. 89. 15 Ibid. 101. 17 Ibid. 75. Leg. Int. 12
JUDGMENT. 575
verdict and judgment will be sustained although the issue be by one only.’ A judg-
ment on an award against two, is erroneous, if one of the defendants only had notice
of the rule of reference.?
If the defendant make default, on return of the summons, the justice cannot give
judgment for the plaintiff, without proof of his demand ; but it must be proved in
the same manner as if the defendant appeared and denied it.’
If there be judgment against two, and one of them die, the plaintiff may have
execution against the survivor.‘
It is essential to the validity of a judgment of a justice of the peace for a sum
exceeding $300, that it should appear upon the face of his record that the par-
ties appeared in person before him, and confessed the judgment. Without this, the
judgment is absolutely void, and therefore not the subject of ratification. The sale
of a defendant’s personal property to the plaintiff upon a void judgment vests no
property in him®
A justice has no power to open his judgment except under the circumstances,
and in the manner provided by act of assembly, to wit: 1. At the instance of
the appellant, with the consent of the adverse party, under § 4 of the act of 1810.
2. Where the defendant is entitled to a rehearing, after judgment, under § 7 of the
same act. 3. In a proceeding under the act of 12th July 1842, where the process
has not been served personally on the defendant. It seems, that the power of a
court of common pleas to open its judgments, obtained adversely, ceases with the
expiration of the term at which they were obtained.’
The record of a judgment rendered in one state, is not merely evidence in every
other state that such a judgment was rendered, but conclusive of the right which it
has decided. To make a record from another state conclusive evidence, and to
give it full faith and credit in the courts of this state, it must be authenticated
according to the act of congress of May 26th, 1790, but a copy of a record not
certified according to the act, may still be received as prima facie evidence®
A judgment fairly obtained in another state is conclusive evidence of a debt;
assumpsit, therefore, will not lie on such a judgment.” A judgment in a sister state
is deemed to have the effect of a domestic judgment, in relation to the cause of
action ; and where the defendant had notice, it is conclusive of the subject-matter,
and the original cause of action is merged in it.’
The judgment of a justice of the peace of another state, is not a record, and can-
not be certified under the act of congress, so as to make the exemplification thereof
competent evidence.” It should be proved by a sworn or examined copy of the jus-
tice’s docket,* except in cases within the provisions of the act of 27th February
1845.4 Or certified under the act of 29th March 1860.%
12W.&S. 121 528,
21258. & BR. 412. 8 Pet. C. C. 74, 155.
3 10 Johns. 106. 2 Pitts. 251. 21 Pitts. L. J. 9 2 Y. 532.
15. 2 Luz. L. Reg. 238. 10 7 W. 315.
41 Esp. 310. 11 16 Penn. St. 241.
5 10 W. 118. 12 10 Ibid. 157.
6 ] Phila. 520. 5 Ibid. 468. 8 Ibid. 299, 546. 134Y.501 148.&R, 440. 4W.&S. 192.
8W.N. C. 28. M4 Purd. 1129.
133 Penn. St. 485. 1 W.N. 0.51. 16 Ibid. 1% Ibid. 821.
[ 576 J
Hudqment, Lien of.
I. Aots relating to judgment liens. IL. Judicial authorities and decisions.
I. Aor 4 Aprit 1798. Purd. 1096.
Szor. 2. No judgment hereafter entered in any court of record within this com.
monwealth shall continue a lien on the real estate of the person against whom such
judgment may be entered, during a longer term than five years [from the first
return-day of the term of which such judgment may be so entered]. unless the
person who may obtain such judgment, or his legal representatives, or other persons
interested, shall, within the said term of five years, sue out a writ of scire facias to
revive the same.
Act 1 June 1887. Purd. 1097.
All judgments entered in any court of record in this commonwealth, or revived in
manner prescribed by this act, or the act to which this is a supplement, shall continue
a lien on the real estate of the defendant for the term of five years from the day of
entry or revival ; and no judgment shall continue a lien on such real estate for a longer
period than five years trom the day on which such judgment may be entered or re-
vived, unless revived, within that period, by agreement of the parties and terre-
tenants filed in writing and entered on the proper docket or a writ of scire facias to
revive the same be sued out within said period according to the provisions of the act
to which this is a supplement, notwithstanding an execution may be issued within a
year and a day from the rendering of such judgment, or a stay of execution may be
entered on such judgment, or a time subsequent to the rendering of such may be ap-
pointed, by agreement of the parties, for the payment of the money for which such
judgment may be rendered, or any part thereof, or notwithstanding any other condi-
tion or contingency may be attached to such judgment; nor shall the revival of such
judgment, by agreement, as aforesaid, or the issuing of a scire facias, either with or
without entry of judgment thereon, have the effect of continuing such lien for a longer
period than five years from the day on which it may be entered or revived, or such
seire facias may have issued. No proceeding shall be available to continue the
lien of said judgment against a terre-tenant, whose deed for the land bound by said
judgment has been recorded, except by agreement in writing signed by said terre-
tenant, and entered on the proper lien docket, or the terre-tenant or terre-tenants be
named as such in the original scire facias.
Act 24 Fepruary 1834. Purd. 593.
Sect. 25. All judgments, which at the time of the death of a decedent shall bea
lien on his real estate, shall continue to bind such estate during the term of five years
from his death, also such judgments be not revived by scire facias, or otherwise,
after his death; and such judgment shall, during such time, rank according to their
priority at the time of such death; and after the expiration of such term, such judg-
ments shall not continue a lien on the real estate of such decedent as against a bond
fide purchaser, mortgagee, or other judgment-creditor of such decedent, unless re-
vived by scire facias or otherwise, according to the laws regulating the revival of
judgments.
Act 23 Marcu 1877. Purd. 1098.
Secr. 1. Whenever a verdict is rendered by a jury, in any of the courts of common
pleas of this commonwealth, for any specific sum of money, in such case, the verdict
shall be a lien upon the real estate, situate within the proper county, of the party or
parties against whom said verdict shall be rendered, which lien shall remain, unless
the court grant a new trial or arrest the judgment; and it shall be the duty of the
prothonotary of the court of common pleas, to enter such verdict on the lien-docket
where judgments are entered, marking the same ‘verdict,’ and specifying the
amount of said verdict and the date of its rendition.
‘ JUDGMENT. 577
Sct. 2. In case the court shall overrule any motion for a new trial or in arrest of
judgment, now pending, the lien of the verdict in such case shall date from the time
of its rendition: Provided, however, That no innocent purchasers without notice
shall be prejudiced thereby.
II. A judgmeut obtained before a magistrate is a lien upon the real estate of the
defendant only from the time a transcript of such judgment is entered on the docket
of the prothonotary of the proper county.1_ Judgments obtained before justices of
the peace, when filed in court, are on the same footing, and entitled to the same
priority with judgments in court.? ‘
A transcript entered on the docket of the common pleas is, as regards real estate,
virtually a judgment of that court. A judgment is not a lien on lands purchased
by defendant after the judgment, and aliened bond fide, before execution. But
the revival of a judgment by scire facias creates a lien on the property acquired
since the original judgment.®
A transcript of a judgment of a justice of the peace, when filed in the common
pleas, according to the 10th section of the act of 1810, becomes a record of that
court, and a set. fa. qu. executio non, may issue upon it therefrom.
A transcript of the judgment of a justice of the peace, filed in the common pleas,
creates no lien upon the defendant’s real estate, if an appeal be entered before the
justice within the time limited by law.” A scire facias to revive a judgment of a jus-
tice, of which a transcript has been filed in the common pleas, agreeable to the
act of 1810, must be issued from the common pleas, and not by the justice.* The
period from which the lien of a judgment runs, is not from the return of the scire
facias, but from the date of the judgment of revival.®
The supplementary act of 26th March 1827, was enacted for the purpose of
restraining the practices which had crept in under the act of the 4th April 1798,
of constructive revivals of judgments by the issuing of execution, or by stay of
execution, or of dispensing with revivals because the money was payable in futuro,
or on a condition or contingency attached to a confession of the judgment, in all
which cases it had been held by the court, or contended by counsel, that the lien
would continue withuot issuing a scire facias within the five years. This act also
altered the date from which the revival was to be reckoned, doing away the relation
to the return-day prescribed by the act of 1798, as the time from which the five
years were to commence. Another and most material object of the act of 1827 was,
to regulate revivals by the agreement of the parties, concerning which nothing had
been said in the act of 1798, but which had become a common usage, It therefore
prescribes precise and positive provisions as to them, pointing out the mode in
which they shall be authenticated, the parties competent to enter into them, and the
time for which the lien shall in that case endure.’
On a scire facias to revive a judgment, the defendant can make no other defence
than either to deny the original judgment altogether, or to show that it has been
satisfied since it was rendered. In no case, nor under any circumstances, can the
merits of the original judgment be inquired into.”
A subsequent purchaser, or judgment-creditor, is not bound to look beyond the
judgment-docket ; if the Christian names of the defendants in a judgment be not
entered in the judgment-docket, the judgment, though valid as between the parties,
cannot affect subsequent purchasers or judgment-creditors. It is the duty of the
renee to see that his judgment is rightly entered on the judgment-
ocket,!?
A judgment obtained on a seire facias on a void judgment, is void also.¥ If a
scire facias be not prosecuted to judgment, until after the lapse of five years from the
time of issuing it, the lien of the original judgment is lost.”
1 See act of 1810 2 10. Purd. 1143, 95 W.163. See 1 Pitts. 325.
21 Binn. 221. 01 5 W. & 8. 354, Sergeant, J.
21P. & W. 20. 158, & R. 68-9. :
42Y. 23, 6 Binn. 135. 12 15 Penn. St. 177. 36 Ibid. 458. See 88 Ibid.
512. & W. 64. 120. 92 Ibid. 186.
6 3 W. 381. 18 3 Whart. 314. 51 Penn. St. 116.
77 Ibid. 540. 1P. & W. 271. M4 61 Penn. St. 204.
£88. & R.470
“BT
[ 578 2
-
SHuvisdiction of Justices of the Peace.
[See Aorions at Law, II.]
I. Definition of jurisdiction. II. Judicial authorities,
I. Jurisprorion is the authority or power, vested in a man or men, a court.
or courts, to do justice in causes of complaint brought before them. The supreme
court and the judges thereof, have jurisdiction all over Pennsylvania, and are not
restrained to any county, district or place; but all other courts, judges and justices,
are confined to their particular districts or jurisdictions, which, if they exceed,
whatever they do is erroneous.
The term jurisdiction has different meanings when applied to different objects ;
thus, there is what is termed jurisdiction over the subject-matter, and as the civil
jurisdiction of justices of the peace is wholly derived from the statute law, if they
have not this jurisdiction expressly conferred upon them by act of assembly, it can-
not be given by consent of parties; no waiver can confer jurisdiction over the
subject-matter, where the law has not given it. But there is also a jurisdiction
of the person of the defendant, which is acquired by due service of legal process ; if
legal process be not issued, or if no legal service of it be made, the justice acquires
no jurisdiction over the person of the defendant, and all his proceedings are void, so
much so, that if he should proceed to judgment, an execution issued on it would be
no justification to the officer serving it, and he himself would thereby become a
trespasser ; but this kind of defect of jurisdiction may be waived by the act of the
defendant, as by an appearance, or other proceeding which presupposes that juris-
diction has been acquired in the mode prescribed by law.*
‘t Jurisdiction is often confounded with judicial power, or its equivalent, judicial
competence; yet, there is a clear distinction between the terms. The judicial
power of a court extends to all those classes of cases which that court may hear and
determine. The jurisdiction of a court is confined to cases actually brought before
it, and admits of various degrees ; for jurisdiction of a case, as a cause in court,
vests the court with authority to call in the parties, and to bring it to a hearing in
some form, so as to determine the cause in court, though the determination of the
case may be beyond its competence. The jurisdiction by which a case may be
determined is measured by the judicial power of the court, and not by the form in
which the case is brought before it.”?
Want of jurisdiction over the subject-matter is not waived by delay ;° it may be
taken advantage of in any stage of the cause.
II. Justices of the peace cannot issue any process in civil cases, except subpenas,
to extend beyond the bounds of their county. All persons and property found
within his district are subject to the alderman’s or justice’s jurisdiction. He has no
power over cases “ where the title to lands and tenements may come in question, or
actions of slander, or upon promise of marriage.” A justice can do no official act out
of his proper district or county. Therefore, he cunnot take the acknowledgment of
a deed for lands lying in his county, anywhere but in that county.
His jurisdiction in ccvil cases is derived from statutes altogether, and where the
cause of action is not embraced in any of these, he cannot interfere.
The rea/ sum due upon a bond must determine the jurisdiction of a justice, though
there be a warrant of attorney to confess a judgment, and the penalty exceed one
hundred dollars? A plaintiff may, undoubtedly, remit the interest on his demand
to bring the residue within the jurisdiction of a justice.® But unless the de-
.
{ 26N. Y. 418. 5 1 Ash. 181.
2 32 Penn. St. 357, Lowrie, J. And see 36 67S. & RB. 63
Ibid. 29. 7 1 Ash, 152
8 2 Pears. 151. 8 2 Dall. 308.
4101 Penn. St. 169. 9 45 Penn. St. 235. See 10 W. N. C. 388.
JURISDICTION OF JUSTICES. 579
mand has been reduced by payments, or by mutual dealings between the parties,
to the statutory standard, he cannot give jurisdiction, by remitting part and suing
for the balance.’
An action will not lie before a justice of the peace for the balance due ona judg-
ment in the court of common pleas.?_ A justice of the peace has not jurisdiction
of a cause of action against another justice, for money collected in his official
capacity ;° nor of an action upon a bond given by a constable conditioned for the
faithful performance of the duties of his office ;* nor of a suit by one joint-owner
of a chose in action against the other, for damages for a refusal to prosecute the
claim on it, by reason of which it was lost ;> nor of an action against a constable,
for not paying over, to a landlord, a year’s rent, out of the proceeds of an execution ;®
nor of an action on the case for a nuisance.”
A justice of the peace has no jurisdiction of account render ;* nor of an action of
debt against the sheriff (or an escape of a defendant in execution, for a sum under
one hundred dollars) ;® nor of an action against an executor or administrator on a
devastavit ;” nor of actions of trespass on the case where the injury is consequential,
as a nuisance; nor of debt for the penalty imposed by the act of April 13th, 1791,
for not entering satisfaction of a judgment ;” nor of an action to recover the
penalty for travelling as a pedlar without licence ;* nor of a suit to recover a militia
fine, although the plaintiff is a constable who alleges that he has paid the amount
for the defendant and seeks to recover it back as money paid, laid out and
expended.™
All questions arising out of a bailment are within the jurisdiction of a justice
of the peace, under the act of 1810.% A justice has jurisdiction of an action against
a common carrier, charged with “ negligence in not delivering goods intrusted to
him,” and with not delivering them according to contract.*
A justice of the peace has jurisdiction to sustain an action upon an insolvent
bond ;!” of an action on an award ;'* of an action of assumpsit for carelessness in the
performance of work ; of an action for unliquidated damages for breach of con-
tract.”
If a bull break into the inclosure of a neighbor, and there gore a horse so that
he die, his owner is liable in an action of trespass, of which a justice has jurisdic-
tion." So, trespass lies, before a justice, under the acts of assembly, rendering
owners of dogs liable for injuries committed by them to sheep.”
A magistrate has jurisdiction of a trespass by a landlord, if he enter the house
of a third person, to search for and distrain goods fraudulently removed by his
tenant, if no goods of the tenant be found in such house, when the damage claimed
is less than three hundred dollars.” ,
A justice of the peace has jurisdiction of an action to recover the penalty for
taking illegal fees.”
A justice of the peace has no jurisdiction of a contract concerning the realty,
where the title to lands or tenements may come in question.* He has not jurisdic-
tion of an action founded on a note given in consideration of a right to dig a mill-
race, and conduct water across the plaintiff’s land ;% nor of an action to recover
damages for a deficiency in quantity on a contract for the sale of land.”. An agree-
meut to purchase a judgment which was a lien on real estate, is not within the pro-
vision excluding from the jurisdiction of justices cases of real contract, where the
title to lands may come in question2® But a justice has jurisdiction of an action
1 37 Penn. St. 387. 73 Ibid. 427. 81 Ibid.439. 16 6 W. 47.
3 .W.N.C. 291. 11 Ibid. 206. 172 ~P. & W. 462. 3 Ibid. 64.
2858. & BR. 343. 18 7 Penn. St. 109.
3 6 W. 384. 19 31 Ibid. 14. 13 Luz. L. Reg. 225.
4 4 Ibid. 215. 20 1 Phila. 162.
5 8 Ibid. 179. 17 W.& S. 367.
6 12 Penn. St. 379. 22 7 Penn. St. 254.
71 Ash. 152. 138. & RB. 420 23138. & R.417. 18 Leg. Int. 29. 3 Phila.
8108. & R. 227. 5 Whart. 448, 424,
9138.4 R. 44. 4% 7 W. 491.
1 Tbid. 2 3P. & W. 388. 18 Penn. St. 240. 20 Ibid.
13 Ibid. 420. 1 Ash. 152. 468.
122138. & R. 102. 2% 6 W. 337.
13 Thid. 104. 27 3 RK. 325.
4] Ash. 13 n. 28 15 Penn. St. 358.
7 W. 542. Ibid. 175,
580 JURISDICTION OF JUSTICES.
upon a negotiable note, in the hands of an indorsee, although the consideration of it
was the sale of a tract of land: otherwise, if the suit be brought by the payee.*
Every justice of the peace has jurisdiction, upon the delivery of a transcript to him,
to recover the amount of a judgment rendered by another justice who has resigned
his office but retains his docket.’ Executions issued by one justice on the tran-
script of another justice of the same county, who was at that time in commission,
and acting in his office, are void; not being allowed by any act of assembly.®
If a claim be tendered by a defendant before a justice of the peace, as a set-off
against the plaintiff’s demand, of which claim the justice would not have had juris-
diction had the defendant first sued there, the justice cannot entertain it.*
Courts of limited jurisdiction (as those of justices of the peace) must not only act
within the scope of their authority, but it must appear on the face of their proceed-
ings, that they did so; and if this do not appear, all that they do is coram non
judice, and void.® Want of jurisdiction of a justice may be taken advantage of in
every stage of the cause; after plea, trial on the merits and judgment; or on appeal
entered and the cause in court. A defect of jurisdiction in a justice is not cured
by the defendant’s appearing and going to trial.”
No justice can take cognisance of a cause that has been previously decided by
another justice.® Where there exist two tribunals possessing concurrent and com-
plete jurisdiction, the jurisdiction of that tribunal is exclusive which has jirst
possession of the subject-matter of controversy. When a justice of the peace issues
his process, which is served according to law on a defendant, the latter cannot turn
round and sue the plaintiff before another justice for any debt or demand arising
from contract not exceeding three hundred dollars, but must submit his claim, by way
of set-off, to the justice before whom the plaintiff has brought suit. Ifa summons
be issued before one justice by a real debtor against his creditor in order to prevent
the latter from suing out a capias, and not in prosecution of areal demand, such a
procedure would be disregarded by the court.®
Where it appears on the face of the record, that the justice has exceeded his
jurisdiction, by giving judgment and issuing execution for a greater sum than the
act of assembly allows, the court will consider the whole proceeding as a nullity, and
discharge a defendant committed under such judgment. But where his jurisdiction
evidently appears on the record, the settled rule has been to form no presumption
against the accuracy of the magistrate’s proceedings," and his judgment, though
erroneous, is binding on the parties, until reversed on certiorari or appeal.”
A justice must proceed by summons or capias, and cannot enter judgment upon
a warrant of attorney.’
Wherever a new power is given to a justice of the peace, he must proceed in the
mode prescribed by the law [he should do so at all times].
As long as the commission of a justice is in force, he possesses an authority to
administer oaths, of which he cannot divest himself; and although he do not sub-
scribe himself as a justice to a deposition, he will be deemed to have acted officially.™
An alderman or justice of the peace is competent to administer any oath required to
support any collateral or interlocutory step found necessary in a cause in the com:
mon law or orphans’ court.!é
15 W. 482. 8 2 Dall. 78, 114.
271W. & 8. 414, 2 Phila. 42. But see 49 9 1 Ash. 171.
1
5
9
Penn. St. 168. 1 Pears. 194. 10 1 Dall. 135.
3 4 Penn. St. 339. 2 Phila, 284. M56 R, 32. 4 Y. 873,
42 Ash. 150. 37 Penn. St. 456. 3298. &R. 12.
5 Pet. 0. C. 36. 18 1 Binn. 105.
6 1 Binn. 220. 37 Penn. St. 387. 101 Ibid. 1 19 Johns. 39.
169, 16 3 Binn. 539.
7 18 Johns. 409. 16 2 Am. L. J. 224,
[ 581 ]
Fustices of the Peace, or Aldermen,
I. The antiquity and authority of this officer VIII. Of the right of the accused to be heard by
as a conservator of the public peace. counsel,
II. The early civil jurisdiction of justices of IX. Proceedings in a criminal case before a
the peace in Pennsylvania. justice of the peace.
IIT. How, by whom, and for how long, justices X. Acts of assembly relating to the election
shall be elected. and qualification of justices.
IV. Aldermen and justices magistrates of the XI. Acts relating to the criminal jurisdiction
same character and authority, &o. of justices.
VY. Their authorities and duties in criminal XII. Justices’ courts in certain counties.
cases. XIII. Summary convictions.
VI. Of issuing a criminal warrant, and its XIV. Copy of an alderman’s commission and
import. oath of office.
VII. Proceedings when the accused is before the XV. Judicial decisions
justice; and
I. “Justices of the peace, ’’says Dalton, ¢. 2, “are judges of record, appointed
by the king (in England, but in Pennsylvania elected by the people) to be justices,
within certain limits, for the conservation of the peace, and for the execution of
divers things comprehended within their commissions, and divers statutes committed
to their care.”
This definition of a justice of the peace seems to be considered so sufficient, to
this day, as to command a place in some of the latest and most approved English
law publications.
Hollinshead reports that William the Conqueror ordained justices of the peace.
This, however, seems to be doubted by Dalton—himself an early and valued writer
on this subject. He thinks they were established about 1327, by Edward III.
The statute here referred to, by Justice Dalton, seems rather to carry with it the
idea that Edward III., at the period spoken of, apportioned and located these
officers, so that, in every shire, there should be a certain number of justices to keep
the peace. Their power was from time to time enlarged. In 2 Hen. V.c. 1, it
was enacted, that justices of the peace should be made “of the most sufficient
persons dwelling in the several counties.” ‘They be,’ says Mr. Dalton, “ called
justices [of the peace] because they be judges of record, and withall to put them
in’ mind [by their name] that they are to do justice [which is to yield to every
man his own, according to the laws, customs and statutes of this realm] without
respect of persons.” “ They may,” he says, in another part of his Country Justice,
“take a recognisance for the peace, &c., which is a matter of record, and which
none can do but a judge of record.” These quotations are accurately taken, and
printed exactly as they are found in Dalton’s Country Justice, London, printed
1762: ‘Justices of the peace are not,” says Dalton, “to pervert justice, which
may be done in many ways. They should arm themselves with the fear of God,
the love of truth and justice, and with the authority and knowledge of the laws
and statutes of the realm.” “They should do justice uprightly and indifferently,
without delay, partiality, fear or bribery; with stout and upright hearts and
uncorrupt hands.”
The statute of 34 Edward IIL, c. 1, provided, “ that in every county of Eng-
land shall be assigned for the keeping of the peace, one Lord, and with him three
or four of the most worthy in the county, with some learned in the law, and they
shall have power to restrain the offenders, rioters and all other barrators, and to
pursue, arrest, take and chastise them according to their trespass or offence; and
to cause them to be imprisoned and duly punished according to the law, and customs
of the realm, and according to that which to them shall seem best to do by their
discretions and good advisements, and also to inform them, and to inquire of all
those that have been pillors and robbers in the parts beyond the sea, and be now come
again, and go wandering and will not labor as they were wont in times past, and
to take and arrest all those that they may find by indictment, or by suspicion,
and to put them in prison; and to take of all them that be not of good fame, where
they shall be found, sufficient surety and mainprise of their good behavior towards
the king and his people, and the other duly to punish, to the intent that the people
'
582 JUSTICES OF THE PEACE.
be not by such rioters or rebels troubled or endangered, nor the peace blemished,
nor merchants, nor other passing by the highways of the realm disturbed, nor put
in the peril which may happen of such offenders. And that fines, which are to be
made before justices for a trespass done by any person, be reasonable and just,
having regard to the quantity of the trespass, and the causes for which they be
mrde.” And by the 4 Edward III. ¢. 2, it was provided, that the keepers of the
peace should send their indictments before the justices of jail delivery, who should
have power to deliver the same jails of those that should be indicted before the
keepers of the peace. .
It would seem, that the election of conservators of the peace was, in England,
made by the people, until the 1 Edward III. c. 16, which act took from the people,
and gave to the king, the appointment of these officers. The importance of the
office at that early day (Edward III. died in 1376) may be safely inferred from
the enactment in the reign of his successor, Richard II., which provides, c. 7, that
“the justices shall be made within the counties, of the most sufficient knights,
esquires and gentlemen of the law.’ rae
The constitution of Pennsylvania, adopted in 1776, provided that justices of the
peace should, by the freeholders, be elected in districts, and serve seven years.
The constitution of 1790 vested in the governor the power of appointing and com-
missioning a competent number of justices of the peace who held their offices
“during good behavior.” And by the present constitution, ‘‘the qualified voters”
are to elect, and the governor to commission the justices of the peace “for a term
of five years.” There is, at this time, in England, a property qualification neces-
sary to hold the office of justice of the peace, of not less than £100 sterling a year.
No property qualification has ever been required as necessary to qualify a citizen to
hold the office of a justice of the peace, in Pennsylvania, although a property quali-
fication was, by the constitution of 1776, made necessary to qualify an elector to
vote for a justice of the peace. None but freeholders could vote at an election for
justices of the peace, under the constitution of 1776.
II. At a very early period, the justices of the peace, in Pennsylvania, were
vested with civil jurisdiction. So early as May 28th, 1715, the general assembly
of the province of Pennsylvania passed ‘‘an act for better determining debts and
demands under forty shillings, and for laying aside the two weeks’ court in the city
of Philadelphia.” In this act, exclusive jurisdiction was given to the justices of
peace to hear and give judgment in all such cases, ‘‘ without further appeal.’’ They
were authorized to issue execution, levy, make sale, and for want of effects to send
the defendant to the “jail of the proper county.” Cases of ‘‘rent and contracts
for real estate” were excluded from their jurisdiction. It is somewhat remarkable,
notwithstanding the great change in the value of money in one hundred and thirty
years, that the legislature have not enlarged the sum for which justices of the peace
may give judgment ‘‘ without further appeal.” It may not be improper here to
remark, that since the passage of the hundred dollar law, 20th March 1810, the civil
jurisdiction of the justices of the peace in matters of debt has not been extended.
Their civil jurisdiction has, from time to time, been extended in amount, and
enlarged so as to embrace a variety of claims which were not before within its reach.
“At present,” says Judge Reed, “their extensive civil jurisdiction constitutes an
important branch of the jurisprudence of the commonwealth.’”?
Soon after the declaration of independence, a convention assembled in Pennsy]-
vania to frame a new constitution for the government of the state. One of their
earliest acts was to oust from office all the justices of the peace that had been
appointed under the proprietary government, and appoint others known to be
favorable to the order of things about to be established. On the 3d of September
1776, “an ordinance for the appointment of justices of the peace for the state of
Pennsylvania,” was passed in the state convention, and “signed, by their order,
B. Franxuin, President.’ They appointed justices of the peace for the city and
county of Philadelphia, and the counties of Bucks, Chester, Lancaster, York, Berks,
Northampton, Northumberland and Westmoreland ; these nine counties being all
1 See 2 Reeves’ Hist. (by Finlason) 328; and 2 Their civil jurisdiction was extended in 1879
Old Colonial Laws 97, 102, 151. to matters not exceeding $300. Purd. 1128.
JUSTICES OF THE PERACE. 083
the counties then laid off in Pennsylvania. The convention gave the said justices
“full power and authority to take acknowledgments of deeds; and cognisances of
criminal offences; and breaches of the peace ; and in cases of petty larceny, under
five shillings, to proceed to punishment.” They were sworn or affirmed ag justices
of the peace, to do everything in that office, to the best of their knowledge and
ability ; to support a government in this state on the authority of the people only.”
The justices, in their several counties, ‘‘ were authorized to appoint jailers.”
In relation to criminal matters, the power and duties of the justices of peace, in
Pennsylvania, are the same as those exercised in England by the same class of
officers, at the time of the revolution, except so far as they have been altered by our
constitution and laws. Every criminal offence is presumed to be within the scope
of their authority to inquire into, to take bail or commit the accused, unless it can
be shown that the justice’s jurisdiction was limited by the common law, or has been
limited or taken away by our constitution or acts of assembly. In civil matters it is
quite otherwise ; and it cannot be too often repeated, that in al cases the justice
must look to the express words of our acts of assembly for the extent of his civil
jurisdiction. The magistrates should be governed by the words of the law, and
exercise no other power than that exprexsly given, except it be to call to their aid
the common law, to carry the law, as written, into full effect. Where they have civil
jurisdiction, they, in most cases, hold the place and exercise the authority of both
court and jury ; they pass upon the law and the facts.
III. Justices of the peace or aldermen shall be elected in the several wards,
districts, boroughs and townships, at the time of the election of constables,! by the
qualified electors thereof, in such manner as shall be directed by law, and shall be
commissioned by the governor for a term of five years. No township, ward, district
or borough shall elect more than two justices of the peace or aldermen, without the
consent of’ a majority of the qualified electors within such township, ward or borough ;
no person shall be elected to such office, unless he shall have resided within the
towaship, borough, ward or district, for one year next preceding his election. In
cities containing over fifty thousand inhabitants, not more than one alderman shall
be elected in each ward or district?
In Philadelphia, there shall be established, for each thirty thousand inhabitants,
one court, not of record, of police and civil causes, with jurisdiction not exceed-
ing one hundred dollars; such courts shall be held by magistrates, whose term of
office shall be five years, and they shall be elected on general ticket, by the qualified
voters at large; and in the election of the said magistrates, no voter shall vote for
more than two-thirds of the number of persons to be elected, when more than one
are to be chosen; they shall be compensated only by fixed salaries, to be paid by
said county; and shall exercise such jurisdiction, civil and criminal, except as
herein provided, as is now exercised by aldermen, subject to such changes, not
involving an increase of civil jurisdiction, or conferring political duties as may be
made by law. In Philadelphia, the office of alderman is abolished,*
IV. Justices of the peace and aldermen are, to all intents and purposes, the
same; enjoying like privileges and authorities, and entitled, for similar services, to
like emoluments; in a word, as one authority, acting under two different names,
and in no other respect whatever differing from each other. It is for this reason
that the names, aldermen or justices of the peace, are, occasionally, just as they
present themselves, used, in this publication, without discrimination, as repre-
senting the jurisdiction and authority which they mutually and equally possess.
Aldermen are the creatures of corporations, and exist only within their bounds.
Justices of the peace exercise the same authorities in the country, usually beyond
the limits of incorporated districts.
Justices of the peace ‘‘are as solemnly bound by the law, both common and
statute, as the judges of the courts, though the same precision and technical for-
mality are not required of them. The parties to a suit; the cause of action; the
1 The constitution provides that all electiors Tuesday of February. Art. VIII. 2 3.
for city, ward, borough and township officers ; for 2 Const. art. V. 3 11.
regular terms of service, shall be held on the third 3 Ibid. 212. See tit. “ Magistrates’ Courts.”
584 TUSTICES OF THE PEACE.
evidence required to support it; the competency of witnesses and of testimony gen-
erally ; the order of proceeding; the operation of a judgment and the right to
execution and satisfaction; the whole range of judicial duties and proceedings,
are but a branch of the general jurisprudence of the state, and are to be regulated
and conducted by the same municipal laws, whether in court or before a justice.
What is sufficient, as a whole, to maintain a suit in court, or to constitute a defence,
is sufficient before a justice, and vice versa.” ‘‘ Where an appeal is allowed, it would
be absurd for the first tribunal [the justice] to try and determine the case by any
other rule than the common law of the land; for, by an appeal, either party
may have his cause ultimately determined by that standard.” ‘ Where no rule is
prescribed by act of assembly, the principles of the common law must he resorted
to, and they will never fail, if properly understood, to conduct to a safe and sure
result.””?
V. All criminal prosecutions are carried on in the name of the commonwealth,
and ostensibly at the expense of the several counties in which the crimes are alleged
to have been committed. It therefore becomes the justices, so far as in them lies, to
prevent the name of the commonwealth from being used as an engine to gratify
private malice, rather than an instrument to promote “the peace and dignity of
the commonwealth.” They should discourage all criminal prosecutions of a trivial
nature. The magistrate, who, from selfish considerations, encourages the angry and
revengeful passions, is a nuisance in his neighborhood, and the earliest occasion
should be taken to make him feel the force of public opinion by his removal from
office.
No warrant should issue on the oath, or affirmation, of any person who is dis-
qualified by nature, by opinion or crime, from being heard as a witness, in support
of the charge, when brought before a court and jury. A prosecution once instituted
is not in the power of the prosecutor to withdraw, at his pleasure ; he is only a
witness on the part of the commonwealth. The offender, having heard the evidence
before the justice, often becomes alarmed as to the consequences of his offence, and
frequently moves everything in his power to put an end to the prosecution. This
must not be permitted, by the justice, when the public interest is at stake and
requires the prosecution of the accused. It is a criminal offence to compound a
felony, and any contract made or security given. in consideration of dropping
a criminal prosecution, or suppressing the evidence on the part of the common-
wealth, is invalid. It is punishable for a man to receive even his own goods which
had been stolen, under a promise not to prosecute.
The only exception to these general principles in Pennsylvania, is contained in
the 9th section of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which provides that in all cases
where a person shall, on the complaint of another, be bound by recognisance, or
committed for an assault and battery, or other misdemeanor, to the injury and
damage of the party complaining, and not charged to have been done with intent
to commit a felony, or not being an infamous crime, and for which there shall also
be a remedy by action, if the party complaining shall appear before the magistrate,
and acknowledge to have received satisfaction for such injury and damage, it shall
be lawful for the magistrate, in his discretion, to discharge the recognisance which
may have been taken for the appearance of the defendant, or, in case of committal,
to discharge the prisoner, upon payment of costs. ‘This section, however, does not
extend to any assault and battery, or other misdemeanor, committed by or on any
officer or minister of justice, The authority of the justice in these cases is a trust
of much importance; it should be exercised with prudence, and a regard not only
to the feelings of the complainant and defendant, but with strict attention to the
public weal.
The right to a preliminary hearing before a magistrate, on a criminal charge, is
a fundamental one, of which the accused cannot be deprived, by sending a bill
before the grand jury in the first instance ; the only exceptions are cases of viola-
tions of the revenue laws, and of innovations upon the peace and good order of
society, where there are no public prosecutors.?
1 2 Penn. BI. 390. ever the district attorney may send a, bill of in-
32 Luz. L, Obs. 409. In u proper case, how- dictment to the grand jury, without a previous
JUSTICES OF THE PEACE, 585
If a justice of the peace see a felony or breach of the peace committed, he may
either arrest the party offending, or order any other person to take him into cus-
tody. This is a power which requires to be cautiously exercised, and only in cases
of necessity; he should be careful never to assume the exercise of a doubtful
authority, nor exercise in a hesitating or doubtful manner the authority with which
he is certainly invested.
A justice may refuse to issue a warrant, if, upon deliberate consideration, he shall
come to the conclusion that it ought not to issue. He must be honest and fearless,
and have, in the language of Dalton, c. 6, a “stout and upright heart, and clean
and uncorrupted hands,” not fearing to offend, nor lending himself or his office to
evil-minded persons, but holding the balance even between the parties and the
commonwealth. Pursuing such a course, he need apprehend no injury, and he
may be assured much good will result from his official conduct.
If he shall be satisfied that a warrant ought to issue, let it issue forthwith, and
be put, for service, into the hands of a constable, or some other trusty person. It
is always better to place the warrant, for service, in the hands of a constable, than
in those of a private person. The officer is to be presumed to know his powers and
duties, and he has been legally qualified to discharge them with fidelity; such
qualifications may not reasonably be expected in private persons. It is, however,
if necessary, in the power of a justice to appoint a private person to serve a criminal
warrant, although it does not appear that Ae can, although a constable may, depute
a private person to serve a civil warrant. It must be directed, as the law requires,
to a constable.
VI. The name of the party to be apprehended should, if known, be correctly
stated in the warrant. If his name be not known, he should be described with as
much certainty and precision as the case will allow; thus— Take the body of a
short, fat, white man, in his shirt sleeves, with a straw hat on, driving a hackney
carriage, No. 774.” A warrant to apprehend a person ¢o be pointed out, or a person
suspected, without naming or describing any person in particular, is egal and void
from its uncertainty ;! such a warrant should never issue, and, if issued, should
never be served. No officer or other person, is bound to serve a process which car-
ries its illegality on its face. The justice should never permit any person to insert
a name, or presume to describe a person ona warrant. The authority vested in the
justice is only vested in him; it is not in his power, on this or any other occasion,
to appoint a deputy.
The warrant should clearly state the offence charged, but it is immaterial whether
it be stated in technical language, or in the language of the witness. The warrant
will be good, whether it shall charge the offender C. D. “ with having committed an
assault and battery on the said A. B.,” or with “‘ having with a piece of wood, or
other hard substance, struck the said A. B. on the head and cut him.” All that
is necessary is, that the warrant shall, with sufficient clearness, make known the
nature of the offence charged and the person who is charged with having com-
mitted it.
A criminal warrant should be issued on the oath or affirmation of one or more
qualified persons; it should be under the hand and seal of the justice, and set forth
the day and year on which it was granted. The style of the warrant, as well as
“of all process, shall be, The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.” The warrant
continues in force until it is fully executed ; although the practice is to make it
returnable forthwith. By an act of assembly passed 16th April 1829, and re-enacted
by the revised code of criminal procedure of 1860, the practice of backing warrants
has been sanctioned and regulated. al
All persons, without distinction, are subject to arrest when accused of a criminal
offence ; of treason, felony or breach of the peace. The exemptions from arrest
which exist in civil cases have no existence in. criminal ones. Thus, married
women, freeholders, minors, every one who his charged with having offended
against the law, broken the peace, or subjected him or herself to punishment for a
binding over; but this power should be exercised Phila. 492. .
under the supervision of the court. 82 Penn. St. 13 Bright. Dig. 3028. ;
405. 11 Phila. 439. 1 Del. Co. R. 50. See 9 7” Const., art. V. 2 23. See 6 Binn. 184.
586 JUSTICES OF THE PEACE.
crime alleged to have been by them committed, are liable to be apprehended ; the
necessary oath or affirmation having first been made, and the necessary process, by
the justice, having been issued. Arrests on criminal warrants may be made on
Sundays or in the night-time. .
In the case of Bailey v. Simpson, the district court of Philadelphia deter-
mined, on the 23d March 1850, “that a warrant issued by an alderman for
obtaining goods by false pretences, cannot be executed on Sunday; that the
execution of such a warrant, on that day, is void by the act of 1705, and
the person executing it becomes a trespasser, and liable to an action for false
imprisonment.” This decision renders expedient an inquiry into the right of an
officer to execute a criminal warrant for a misdemeanor not involving an actual
breach of the peace, upon Sunday. The act of 1705 provides, that “ no person or
persons, upon the first day of the week, shall serve or execute, or cause to be
served or executed, any writ, precept, warrant, order, judgment or decree, except
in cases of treason, felony or breach of the peace; but the serving of any such
writ, precept, warrant, order, judgment or decree shall ve void, to all intents and
purposes whatsoever ; and the person or persons serving or executing the same,
shall be as liable to the suit of the party grieved, and to answer damages to him
tor doing thereof, as if he or they had done the same without any writ, precept,
warrant, order, judgment or decree at all.” This act is an exact transcript of the
statute of 29 Car. II. c. 7, which has received a judicial construction in several
reported decisions ; and the exemption from arrest is contained in similar terms to
the constitutional provision that senators and representatives “shall in all cases,
except treason, felony and breach of the peace, be privileged from arrest during
their attendance at the session of their respective houses, and in going to and
returning from the same.” The like privilege is enjoyed by members of parliament
io Great Britain? In The King v. Wilkes, Lord Camden delivered the unanimous
judgment of the court of common pleas, that a ibel is not a breach of the peace,
and that a member of parliament is not liable to arrest by reason of having been
convicted of that offence ;> very soon afterwards, however, it was resolved by
both houses of parliament, that the writing and publishing seditious libels was
not entitled to privilege* In Hawkins v. Frackman, the court of King’s Bench
discharged a man, upon motion, who had been arrested upon a Sunday, under an
attachment for non-payment of costs.5 And in Osborne v. Carter, a defendant
taken on a capias utlagatum, on a Sunday, was discharged. So, an arrest on that
day, on a commission of a rebellion, out of the exchequer of pleas, is illegal.1 None
of these cases, however, with the exception of that in 2 Wils., were indictable
offences, and in opposition to that authority, we have the opinion of Lord Holt, in
Cecil v. Nottingham, who said in reference to an arrest on Sunday under an attach-
ment for contempt— Suppose, it were a warrant to take for forgery, perjury, &c.,
shall they not be served on Sunday? And shall not any process at the king’s suit,
be served on Sunday? Sure, the Lord’s day ought not to be a sanctuary for male-
factors; and partakes of the nature of process upon an indictment.”’® So, one may
be taken on Sunday upon an escape-warrant.® And Sir William Blackstone says,
“it seems to have been understood that no privilege of parliament was allowable to
the members, their families or servants, in any crime whatsoever ; for all crimes are
treated by the law as being contra pacem domini regis. And instances have not
been wanting wherein privileged persons have been convicted of misdemeanors, and
committed, or prosecuted to outlawry, even in the middle of a session ; which pro-
ceeding has afterward received the sanction and approbation of parliament.” The
weight of authority, therefore, appears to be decidedly in favor of the right to
make an arrest on Sunday, for any crime, although not involving an actual breach
of the peace; and accordingly, the court of common pleas of Bucks county decided,
1 Purd, 1960. 8 12 Mod. 348. The execution of a search-war-
21 Bi. Com, 166. rant on Sunday, was valid at common law. 13
8 2 Wils. 154. See also 18. & R.151. 1 Phila. Mass. 324, 247. 17 Pick. 106-9.
460. 2 Gr. 506. % 2 Salk. 626. 6 Mod. 95. 1 Atk. 55. idg.
41 Bl. Com, 166. P. C. 289. Cas. temp. Hardw. 102. aoe
5 2 Ridg. P. C. 309 n. Andsee9S.& R150. 1° 1 Bl. Com. 166. Cas. temp. Hardw. 103 n.
6 Barnes 319. Willes 459. 1 Tidd’s Pr. 191,
1 Impey on Sheriff 81, And see 2 E. & Bl. 717.
JUSTICES OF THE PEACE. 587
in 1839, that a warrant of arrest, on a charge of malicious mischief, could be exe-
cuted on Sunday, and was not rendered unlawful by the act of 1705.
VII. The accused being brought before the magistrate, he may, after the exami-
nation of witnesses, discharge the prisoner, take bail, or commit him for trial; or
he may take bail, or commit him for a further hearing, before himself. ‘ Where a
justice has authority to inquire into an offence, and commit the prisoner, hold him
to bail or discharge him, as circumstances may require, he may take a recognisance
for his appearance before him, from time to time, pending the examination And
the condition of such a recognisance is not fulfilled by the appearance of the accused,
if he abscond during the examination.”? But, it seems, a committing magistrate has
no right to detain a prisoner for examination for a longer period than three days,
unless under extraordinary circumstances.®
As little time should be permitted to elapse before a final decision is made, by the
magistrate, as is consistent with a due admiyistration of justice. The magistrate
may, verbally, direct the constable to detain the prisoner until he can make out his
mittimus. The justice has authority to cause to come before him all persons who
he has reason to believe may be material witnesses for the commonwealth, or the
defendant, in whose presence the witnesses should be examined. In the language
of the constitution of Pennsylvania, ‘the accused hath a right to be heard by him-
self and his counsel ;” to demand the nature and cause of the accusation against
him,” and ‘to meet the witnesses face to face.”
There is no disqualification on the ground of relationship between the accused
and the witness, save only that of husband and wife. They may not testify for or
against each other, save, only, when they are themselves the party threatened
or injured, and so threatened or injured by the husband or the wife against whom
they appear as a witness. From the necessity of the case, the complainant is per-
mitted to be examined as a witness.
When the accused is brought before the justice, he should be informed that he
is neither bound to confess his guilt, nor to accuse himself. To induce him so to do,
by promises or threats, is as unbecoming as it is unjust; neither the prosecutor,
aor the officer who has him in custody, should be permitted to use any influence to
induce or to betray him into a confession. A confession so obtained, is, in itself, of
no value ; it is not even admissible, as evidence, on the trial of the party.
The duty of a justice of the peace, when the accused is brought before him, is
thus stated by Lord Hale.* “ Lastly, what is to be done after the warrant is served,
and when the person accused is brought before the justice thereupon ?
“If there be no cause to commit him, found by the justice, on examination of
the fact, he may discharge him.
“Tf the case be bailable [before him], he may bail him.
“Tf he has no bail, or the case appears not to be bailable, he must commit him.
“ And being either bailed or committed, he is not to be discharged, till he be
convicted or acquitted, or delivered, by proclamation.”
The power to take recognisances for the appearance of parties accused of criminal
offences, was expressly conferred on justices of the peace by the act of 1722, which
provided that they should have full power and authority to take all manner of
recognisances and obligations, as any justice of the peace of Great Britain may, can
or usually do. And this power, except in cases of certain heinous crimes, is con-
tinued to them by the 7th section of the Code of Criminal Procedure.*
If the magistrate take bail, it must be for the appearance of the accused at the
next term of the court, to answer the charge preferred against him. But if he
commit, in default of bail, it is not for trial at any particular term of the court ;
and in such cases, the prisoner may be brought to trial immediately, if the court
be then in session. There is no reason, on the one hand, why a prisoner should
not be entitled to a trial during the term at which he is committed, and as speedily
as the business of the court will permit; nor, on the other hand, why, if witnesses
be present and ready to testify, the case must be postponed until a succeeding term,
when the postponement is not necessary to enable the defendant to prepare his case®
11 Haz. U.S. Reg. 263. See also, Dalt. Just. 829. 10 B. & Cr. 28. 1 U.S. Law Mag. 101.
9,¢.3. 18. & BR. 351-2. 4 1 Hale H. P. C. 583.
26S. &R. 127, 5 Purd. 546,
31 Hale H. P. C.585. Ibid. 120. Cro. Eliz. 6 Com. v. Hart, Q. S. Phila. 1858.
588 JUSTICES OF THE PEACE.
V{II. “ An attorney has no right to interfere as advocate, or otherwise, for or
against a prisoner, charged before a magistrate with felony or indictable misde-
meanor; indeed he has no right even to be present; for this being merely a pre-
liminary proceeding, to ascertain whether there are sufficient grounds for sending
the prisoner to his trial before a jury, it is similar to the inquiry before the grand
jury, and no person has a right to interfere, nor is the justice’s room, upon such an
occasion, deemed an open court.! The justices may, and frequently do, allow
attorneys to act for the prisoner or prosecutor, and even sometimes allow a case to
stand over until the prisoner’s attorney is in attendance, but this must be con-
sidered a matter of courtesy, not of right.’’? The 9th article of the Declaration
of Rights, contained in the Constitution of Pennsylvania, declares, that ‘in all
criminal prosecutions, the accused hath a right to be heard by himself and his
counsel.” But it has not been decided by our courts, and is extremely doubtful,
whether this provision applies to a preliminary hearing before a committing magis-
trate. It would appear, from the céntext, to apply only to trials before a court
having authority to convict of the offence charged.
It too frequently happens that magistrates bind over or commit, without having
given the question of guilt or innocence, that grave consideration to which it is
entitled. This is sometimes done under the idea, that such binding over will but
slightly, if at all, affect the interest, or the character, of the accused. This is act-
ing upon mistaked principles. No man can, after a hearing, be called upon, by a
justice, to give bail for his appearance, to answer to a criminal charge, without
having his character, in some measure, tainted ; and the taint will be faint or deep,
according to the nature of the charge, and the general business character of the com-
mitting magistrate.
No magistrate can legally bind over any person or persons, charged with a criminal
offence, without probable cause being either admitted or conceded by the party or
parties defendant, or its existence being proved on oath, by the person or persons
making the charge. The necessary prerequisite for binding over, is probable cause
for the act, and a magistrate cannot know of the fact, without its admission, or due
proof.* In all cases where it is clear from the evidence adduced on a primary hear-
ing, that the party has committed the offence of which he stands charged, or where
there is good reason to believe he has committed the offence; or where, from all
the facts in the case, there is reasonable doubt as to his having committed the
offence or not; the justice holding the primary hearing, under any of these cireum-
stances, must bind the party over to be tried by a jury. The right of an accusing
party to go before a court and jury with his complaint and his evidence, that it
may be sustained and the party punished for a violation of law, is equal to the
right of the accused party to seek the same source for an acquittal.t But if there
shall not have been such evidence as would warrant a jury in finding a defendant
guilty, it would be wrong for a judge or justice to send such a defendant to a jury
for trial.
Iu Philpot v. Bailey, it was said by Mr. Justice Burnside, that in a criminal
ease a magistrate is only to decide whether there is sufficient evidence to hold to
bail, but he ought to hear the defendant’s evidence of matters which could be easily
explained, if the accused were allowed to offer testimony. ‘The practice ought to
be so moulded that the magistrate could hear and judge of the reasonableness of
the defendant’s explanations. At the same time, he ought not to try the case, but
to moderate the rule in accordance with justice. He may examine witnesses who
were present at the time when the offence is said to have been committed, to explain
what is said by the witnesses for the prosecution.? Evidence may be heard for the
defendant where it is of that positive, absolute and ,convincing kind, that it leaves
no doubt of his innocence ; but if it merely tend to throw doubt upon the case,
and impose the duty of deliberation and comparison on the magistrate, it must be
rejected. Thus, although it is the duty of a committing magistrate to determine
the credibility of the witnesses for the prosecution, from the character of the
testimony and from conflicting evidence; yet he has no authority to hear evidence
113B. & Cr. 37. 5 United States ». Hough, Dist. Court U.S. 22
2 Arch. Justice of Peace, April 1850, Kane, 5. Ms.” caches
3 Vaux 13. ® Court of Nisi Prius, 9 April 1850
4 Ibid. 28. 72 W.C. C.30,
JUSTICES OF THE PEACE. 589
directly to impeach the credibility of the prosecutor’s witnesses. He has no power
to find the facts, but only to determine whether there be probable cause to put the
defendant on his trial ; and if his guilt or innocence be doubtful, he should be held
to answer.”
These are some of the high and important duties which appertain to the office
of an alderman, or justice of the peace, in criminal cases. It would be difficult for
any man, however delicate and correct may be his feelings, or his respect for the
feelings of others, or however sound may be his judgment, or extensive his know-
ledge of the world, to make any reasonable estimate of what would be the solemnity
of his feelings, or his deep sense of responsibility, if called upon to fill the office of
a justice of the peace, when citizens, who have, up to the time they are brought
before him, sustained high and general characters for integrity and honor, are
now arraigned before him, and charged with offences of the deepest dye! The
duties, which then devolve upon the magistrate, require all his collectedness of
mind and independence, to carry him through, with the dignity and firmness which
his station demands.
TX. PRocEEDINGS IN THE OFFICE OF A MAGISTATE, IN A ORIMINAL OASE.
v.
James CRIB.
Noy. 14, 1880, 3 o’clock, p. u. George Jones complains to the magistrate, that James
Crib had assaulted and beat him, and asks that a warrant may issue to have him appre-
hended.
Magistrate.—You must make your complaint under oath, or I cannot issue a warrant.
The constitution provides that no criminal or search-warrant shall issue, unless the appli-
cation is supported by “‘ oath or affirmation.” Jones.—I am ready to do so.
Magistrate (administering the oath).-—You do swear that you will true answers make
to such questions as I shall ask you. Answer.—lI do.
Magistrate.—Did James Crib commit on you an assault and battery ? Jones.—He did;
in the presence of Patrick Ward and John Smith. é
Magistrate.—You had better, if convenient, have one or both of them here at the
hearing. Jones.—I do not think they will come without a subpena.
Magistrate—I should not know at what time to require their attendance, as I do not
know at what time the constable may arrest him. If, however, their testimony shall be
found necessary, the defendant may be held to bail, and a time fixed for another hearing.
Then subpenas may issue, and you can have your witnesses present. Where will the
constable find James Crib? Constable.—I know Crib. I think I can soon find him.
The magistrate issues the warrant, and delivers it to the constable, who says : I expect
to have him here at four o’clock this afternoon.
Same day, magistrate's office, 4 o’clock, P. M.
Constable.—I have here the body of James Crib, as I am commanded in this warrant.
If the alderman is at leisure to hear the case, the complainant is here.
Magistrate.—I am ready. You, George Jones, do swear that the evidence you will give
shall be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. State your complaint.
Jones.—I was going down Highth street above Market, this morning, when James Crib,
this man, ran across the street, from John Grog’s tavern. He appeared intoxicated, and
rushing up to me, with his fist doubled, swore that if I did not cry out ‘‘ Hurrah for the
mayor!” he would lick me. I said I would not ery out any such thing. He then struck
me on the face with his fist, and knocked me down. When I got up, he made at me to
strike me again, but I caught hold of him, and held him until some men came and
separated, us.
Magistrate (to Crib).—You may ask him any questions you think proper.
Crib.— At what hour was it that you say you saw me this morning? Jones.—About
10 o'clock. ‘
Crib.—Who was with you? Jones.-—No one.
Crib.— Was anybody with you? Jones.—No. .
Crib.—Where were you going? Jones.—To my shop, in Decatur street.
Crib.—Did you not call out to me from the other side of the street, that we had been
beaten at the election? Jones.—Yes, I did.
Crib.—Did you not come across the street towards me, shaking your fist? Jones.—Not
till you first left your side of the street, and came toward me, threatening me.
Tur CoMMONWEALTH OF “ee
4
1 1 Pitts. 437. Andsee4 Y.125. 3Am.L.J. 91. r
590 JUSTICES OF THE PEACE.
Crib.—Did you not give me the first blow?’ Jones.—No ; you struck me first, as I can
prove by witnesses. :
Crib.— What witnesses? Jones.— Patrick Ward and John Smith.
Crib.—I ask that these witnesses be produced and examined, before further proceed-
ings. Jones.—I have no objection. ;
Magistrate.—I adjourn this case until to-morrow morning at 9 o'clock. James Crib, you
must find bail, in $100, for your appearance at that hour, at this office ; and that, in the
meantime, you will keep the peace. The complainant is held in $50, to appear.
Crib.—Amos Carroll would bail me, if he were here. ; .
Magistrate, addressing the constable, says: Here is a commitment for James Crib; and
they both leave the office.
Jones.—I want a subpena for Ward and Smith.
Magistrate makes out a subpena, returnable Nov. 15, 9 o’clock a. u.
Jones.—Will it do for me to serve the swhpena myself? Magistrate—Yes; you have
a right to serve the subpena yourself.
The constable, Crib and Carroll return to the office.
Crib.—I offer Amos Carroll as bail for my appearance to-morrow.
Magistrate (administers an oath to Carroll to make true answers to such questions as
shall be asked him).—Are you a householder? Carroll.—Yes; I keep house No. 75
North Seventh Street. :
Magistr'ate—Are you worth $100, after the payment of all your debts and responsihili-
ties? Carroll.—I am.
Magistrate notes the recognisance on his docket, which was in the common form.
Nov. 15, 1880, 9 o’clock, a. m. Present, Crib, Patrick Ward, John Smith, George
Jones.
Magistrate (to Jones).—Are your witnesses here? Jones.—Yes. Patrick Ward.
Magistrate (administers oath to Ward).—State what you saw of the struggle between
Jones and Crib.
Ward. states, in substance, that he saw Crib running hastily across the street, towards
Jones, who was calling something out to him ; that he saw Crib instantly strike Jones
with his fist, on the face, and Jones fell. After Jones got up there was a struggle, and
they clenched each other. Some persons came up, and we separated them.
Crib (cross-examines).—Can you swear that I struck the first blow? Ward.—The
first and only blow I saw struck, was by you.
John Smith sworn. His testimony was much the same as Ward’s.
Magistrate.—Crib, I must bind you over, in $200, to answer, at the next court of quarter
sessions for the county of Philadelphia, on a charge of assault and battery. Have you
any bail? Crib.—No.
Magistrate.—Then I must commit you.
Makes out commitment.
Crib.—I suppose Carroll would bail me. He is outside the door.
Magistrate.—Get him here. You ought to have mentioned that before the commitment
was made out, and saved yourself the cost of the commitment.
Carroll having justified, in $200, his recognisance, together with that of Crib, is taken
by the magistrate. The witnesses are all bound over, in $50 each, to appear and testify.
: Magistrate’s office, November 15, 1880.
Enter George Jones (to the magistrate).—In this affair I think I was too hasty, and
should be willing to settle the matter with Crib. Ile is a good-natured fellow; everybody
says he is never quarrellous except he has been drinking.
Magistrate.—In a matter of this kind I have authority to settle it, provided such is the
desire of both complainant and defendant. Take a friend with you and call on Crib and
talk the matter over, and should you agree on terms of settlement, I shall be pleased to
discharge it from my docket. Inasmuch as you think you have been hasty in the matter,
I think you should pay part of the costs. But you may settle that as you and he shall.
agree.
After a lapse of some days, Crib and Jones come to the magistrate, and say that they
have agreed to settle the matter, that they have divided the costs, and desire the complaint
to be dismissed.
_ The magistrate then makes the following entry on his docket which is signed by both,
viz. :
Ws, the pone
lainant and defendant in the above case, having agreed to settle the same,
hereby mutual
y request that the complaint be dismissed and all proceedings be stayed,
Grorcs JongEs,
os : J Cris.
Dismissed accordingly, November 18, 1880. eee ae
JUSTICES OF THE PEAOKE. 591
X. OF THE ELECTION AND QUALIFICATION OF JUSTICES.
1. Mode of conducting the Election.
The qualified voters of the respective wards, boroughs and townships, in this
commonwealth,’ shall, in the year of our Lord 1840, and whenever by this act it
becomes necessary thereafter, at the times? and places fixed for the election of con-
stables in the said wards, boroughs and townships, elect justices of the peace and
aldermen as follows: for each township shall be elected two justices of the peace;
for each borough, not divided into wards, shall be elected two justices of the
peace; for each ward in a borough shall be elected two justices of the peace; for
each ward in a city shall be elected two aldermen ; * * * and such election shall
be held, and conducted in the mode and manner, and by the same officers and per-
sons, as the constables’ elections are held and conducted. But where a borough
forms part of a township in which it is situated, the qualified voters of said
borough shall not be permitted to vote for justices of said township, nor shall the
qualified voters of the township be permitted to vote for justices of said borough.
When a borough forms part of a township or townships, composing together one
general election district, and which are entitled by the act to which this is a supple-
ment, to separately elect two justices of the peace, it shall be the duty of the judge
and inspectors elected to hold the general and township elections of each year, to
provide a separate box into which they shall put the tickets voted for justices of' the
peace for said borough; and the tickets voted for justices of the peace by the quali-
fied voters of the township, shall have the word “Township” written or printed on
the outside; and the tickets voted for justices of the peace by the qualified voters
of the borough shall have the word “ Borough ” written or printed on the outside,
and the said judge and inspectors shall count the votes so voted for justices of peace
for said borough, and return the same in like manner, as provided for in the elec-
tion of justices of the peace for townships.*
It may. be lawful for the qualified electors of any township that is or may here-
after be created, to elect such number of justices of the peace as by law the said
township may be entitled to, at such times and places as are already prescribed by
law.
When any new township shall be erected in any county of this commonwealth,
it shall be lawful for the court of quarter sessions of the proper county to authorize
the citizens of said new township to hold an election for justices of the peace, and
all other township officers, upon such notice as the court may direct.®
Elections under this act shall be held and conducted in the same manner and by
the same officers who are or shall be required by law to hold and conduct elections
of constables in the respective wards, boroughs and townships in this common-
wealth."
The officers and other persons holding and conducting such elections for aldermen
and justices of the peace, shall make true duplicate returns of such elections, one
of which returns * * * shall be handed by such constable to the prothonotary of
the proper county, to be filed in his office; and the said prothonotary shall fortb-
with send a certified copy of such return to the secretary of the commonwealth.°
All aldermen or justices of the peace who shall be elected on the third Tuesday
of February next, or in any year thereafter, whose terms of office would, under
existing laws, expire prior to the first Monday of May, shall continue in office from
the date at which said term would otherwise expire, until the first Monday of May
next ensuing thereto.®
It shall be the duty of the constable of the proper ward, district, borough or
township to give at least twenty days’ notice, by advertisement, preceding the elec-
tion to be held on the third Tuesday of February of each year, of the expiration
of the term of the commission of any alderman or justice of the peace that may
1 No person can vote at an election fora justice, © Act 5 April 1849 2 32. Ibid.
unless he be an elector of the proper ward. 3 Luz. T Act 21 June 1839 ¢ 8. Ibid. . .
L, Reg. 3. 8 Ibid. 9 2. The omitted part of this section
2 On the third Tuesday of February, by the was repealed by act 13 April 1859 ¢ 2. Pamph.
constitution of 1874. 592. ‘
5 Act 21 June 1839 3 1. Purd. 1121. 9 Act 22 March 1877 31. Purd.1122. See 1 Leg.
4 Act 7 March 1840 31. Ibid. ~ Rec. R. 39. bid. 213.
5 Act 11 July 1842 344. Ibid. 1122.
592 JUSTICES OF THE PEACE.
axpire on or before the first Monday of May following, and also of any vacancy
that may happen by death, resignation or otherwise.’ : :
If any vacancy shall take place, after any ward, district, borough or township
election, by reason of the erection of any new ward, district, borough or town-
ship, or from the neglect or refusal of any person elected to accept a commission,
within sixty days after the date thereof, or by death, resignation or otherwise,
such vacancy shall be filled by appointment by the governor, until the first Monday
of May succeeding the next ward, district, borough or township election.’ :
The aldermen or justices of the peace elected under the provisions of this act,
shall file an acceptance of said office with the prothonotary of the proper county,
stating therein the name of the alderman or justice of the peace whom they succeed,
with the cause of vacancy; and said prothonotary shall certify the same, under
his seal of office, to the secretary of the commonwealth, whereupon the governor
shall issue commissions to such persons as shall appear to be duly elected, for the
term of five years, to be computed from the first Monday of May succeeding
the election, for which said commission each person so elected an alderman or
justice of the peace shall pay three dollars, to be received by the recorder of deeds
of the proper county, to be by him transmitted to the secretary of the common-
wealth, as fees for other commissions are transmitted; and the said aldermen or
justices of the peace shall be, by the said recorder, sworn or affirmed, in the man-
ner now provided by law.*
2. Contested Elections.
The returns of elections of justices of the peace and aldermen are subject to the
inquiry, determination and judgment of the court of quarter sessions of the peace
in which the election contested shall be held,* upon the complaint of twenty-five
or more of the proper township, ward or borough, of an undue election or false
return; five of whom shall take and subscribe, on oath or affirmation, before some
person authorized by the laws of this commonwealth to administer oaths, setting
torth that they verily believe the facts stated therein are true; that according to
the best of their knowledge and belief, the election was undue or illegal, and the
return not correct; and that the petition to contest the same is made in good faith?
The petition must be filed within thirty days after the day of election; and must
concisely set forth the cause of complaint, showing wherein it is claimed the elec-
tion was undue or illegal; and after filing, cannot be amended, unless such amend-
ment be allowed by the proper court or judge, after notice to the other party and
hearing; and if allowed, reasonable time must be given to answer. All the peti-
tioners and affiants must be duly qualified electors; and this must be averred in
the complaint.’ The omission of such averment is a fatal defect of jurisdiction ;
and cannot be cured by an amendment, after the lapse of thirty days. The jurat
ae show by whom the oath was made; and must be in the form prescribed by
aw.?
In all cases, where the election of justices of the peace is contested, the justices
then in commission are to continue to exercise and discharge the duties of their
respective offices, until their successors are duly commissioned and qualified.”
3. Increasing number of Justices.
If the qualified voters of any ward, borough or township, in this commonwealth,
shall desire to elect more than the number of justices of the peace or aldermen,
prescribed by this law for such ward, borough or township, such qualified voters
may, at the times and places of holding constables’ elections, express such desire
and consent in the following manner, namely: such of the said voters as are in
1 Act 22 March 1877 3 2. Purd. 1122.
4 Thid. 2 3.
8 Thid. ¢ 4. The courts will take judicial notice
of the fact that a person is commissioned as a
justice of the peace. 14 Penn. St. 413-17. 138
Luz. L, Rog. 439. A certified copy of the record
of the commission is evidence to prove his official
character. 7 W. 334-5.
4 Purd. 767, 1122.
5 Purd. 768, 1122.
® Ibid.
7 11 Phila. 400, 403,
8.3 W.N. C. 165.
9 13 L. Bar 183.
10 Act 15 April 1845 3 21. Purd. 1123. See
further as to contested elections of justices, tit.
“ Hlections,” XIII.
JUSTICES OF THE PEAOR. 593
favor of electing more justices or aldermen, shall vote tickets labelled on the out.
side with the word ‘ Justices” or “ Aldermen,” and the inside of such tickets shal]
contain the words “ Increase one” or “Increase two,” as they may desire, and such
of the said voters who are opposed to the election of more justices or aldermen shall
vote tickets labelled ‘‘ Justices” or ‘‘ Aldermen” on the outside, and the inside of
such tickets shall contain the words “No increase.” And if it shall appear by such
election that a majority of the qualified voters within such ward, borough or town-
ship are in favor of electing more justices or aldermen, then such additional num-
ber of justices or aldermen shall, at the next constables’ election thereafter, be
elected and commissioned in the same manner as the other justices or aldermen
are under this act: Provided, That no election shall be held under this section
unless at least fifty qualified voters of the proper ward, borough or township, shall
give notice, in writing, to the constable thereof, that they desire to vote, at the next
constables’ election thereafter, for such increase, and on receiving such notice the
said constable shall, by at least ten written or printed handbills, put up in the most
public places in said ward, borough or township, at least twenty days before said
election, give notice that at said election a vote will be taken to ascertain whether
the qualified voters of said ward, borough or township, consent to the election of a
greater number of justices or aldermen. And it shall be the duty of the officers
and others holding such election under this section, to make out true duplicate
returns of the same, and file one of said returns in the office of the prothonotary
of the proper county, and in case a majority of the voters of such borough or town-
ship are in favor of an increase, the proper constable shall immediately transmit by
mail to the governor the other of the said returns, and no such increase in any
borough, ward or township, shall exceed two.!
4. Of Justices’ Bonds.
Before any person elected a justice of the peace or alderman shall enter upon
the discharge of the duties of his office, such person shall give bond in such sum,
not less than five hundred dollars, nor more than three thousand dollars, as the
court of common pleas, or one of the judges, in vacation, shall direct, with one or
more sufficient sureties, unless in the opinion of the court or of said judge, the
person elected is possessed of a freehold estate of a value above all reprises, equal
to the amount in which security should otherwise be required, which bond shall be
taken by tbe prothonotary in the name of the commonwealth,? with conditions for
the faithful application of all moneys that come into his hands as an officer, and such
bond shall be held in trust for the benefit of all persons who may sustain injury
from the said justice or alderman in his official capacity :* Provided, That the
surety shall in no case be liable where proceedings shall not have been commenced
within eight years from the date of the bond, in the manner prescribed by the act
of the 14th of June 1836, in relation to official bonds, and be proceeded in agreeable
to the provisions of said act.*
Whenever, upon petition and due proof, if it shall be made to appear to the court
of common pleas of the proper county,° that any justice of the peace or alderman of
any city or county, who has not been required to give security, has become or is
likely to become insolvent; or that any surety of any justice or alderman has
removed from the state, or become insolvent, or is likely to become insolvent; and
when, upon the petition of any surety of any justice or alderman, and proof as
aforesaid, it shall appear such justice or alderman has become or is likely to become
insolvent, such court may require any such justice or alderman to give security, or
1 Act 21 June 1839 2 4. Purd. 1123.
2 A justice’s bond, duly filed and indorsed
“approved” by the prothonotary, is a record of
the court, and may be read in evidence, without
farther proof of execution. 1 Gr. 359.- ;
3 The sureties are liable for money received by
the justice, in an action before him, wherein the
defendant confessed judgment for a sum beyond
his jurisdiction. 8 Penn. St. 415. They are lia-
ble for all moneys received by him on suits, or
claims to be put in suit, or on execution, or re-*
ceived from a constable on execution ; but not for
38
anything received on claims to be collected as an
agent, and without suit. 2 Penn. St. 448. They
are liable for money collected by the justice in
his official capacity, though without suit. 47
Ibid. 335.
4 Act 21 June 1839 2 6. Purd. 1124.
5 By act 8 May 1850 2 9, the application may
be made in vacation to any one or more of the
judges, whose action in the premises shall have
the same force and effect as though made by the
court in session. Purd. 1124.
594 JUSTICES OF THE PEACE.
additional security, or counter-security, to indemnify the surety so petitioning
against loss by reason of his suretyship, as the case may be, in the manner provided
by the 6th section of the act, entitled “an act providing for the election of alder-
men and justices of the peace,’ in such sum, and by such time as the court may
think necessary and proper.’ .
Whenever, upon the petition of any surety and due proof, it shall be made to
appear to the court of common pleas of the proper county, that any alderman or
justice of the peace of any city or county of this commonwealth, by reason of habits
of intemperance, is likely to increase the responsibility of his sureties, such court
may require such alderman or justice of the peace to give security to indemnify the
surety so petitioning against loss by reason of his suretyship, in the manner provided
by the 6th section of the act, entitled ‘‘an act providing for the election of alder-
men and justices of the peace,” in such sum and by such time as the court may
think necessary and proper.
5. Removal, residence, office, seal.
The several aldermen and justices of the peace, elected and commissioned under
this act, shall be subject to removal in the same manner and for the same causes
prescribed by the existing laws of this commonwealth ; and during their continuance
in office, shall respectively keep their offices in the ward, borough or township, for
which they shall have been elected.’
No justice of the peace shall act as such, unless he shall reside within the limits
of the district for which he was commissioned.*
No licence for keeping a tavern or public house of entertainment, shall be granted
to any person, either directly or indirectly, who at the same time holds a commission
of the peace; and if any justice of the peace or alderman shall keep his stated
office in any tavern or public house of entertainment, or any building appertaining
thereto, he shall, for every such offence, on conviction thereof in any court ot
quarter sessions of the peace, * * * forfeit and pay the sum of fifty dollars, one
moiety thereof to the overseers, guardians or directors of the poor of the township,
district or county where such offence shall have been committed, to be applied to
the support of the poor, and the other moiety thereof to the prosecutor.
In all cases of the creation of any new township, borough or ward, in any city
or county of this commonwealth, the commissions of justices of the peace and
aldermen, within the respective territories out of which such township, borough or
ward, has been or may be created, shall continue for the proper township, borough
or ward, in which such justices or aldermen may respectively reside, for the balance
of the official term; and any deficiency in the proper number of aldermen or
justices of the peace within the territories of either of such new divisions, accord-
ing to the number allowed to each township, borough and ward, by the act of the
21st day of June 1839, shall be supplied at the next succeeding elections for
constables in the said township, boroughs and wards.®
Every alderman in the cities of Philadelphia and Lancaster shall be provided
with a public aldermanic seal, with which he shall authenticate all his acts, instru-
ments and attestations ; on which seal shall be engraved the arms of this common-
wealth, and shall have for legend, the name, surname and office of the alderman
using the same, and the place of his residence.’
The official acts of the aldermen in and for the cities aforesaid, certified to under
their respective hands and official seals, shall and may be received and read in
evidence of the facts therein certified, in all suits that now are or hereafter may be
depending, without obtaining the certificate of the clerks or prothonotaries of the
county courts to their official character.2 For such service they shall be allowed a
fee of twenty-five cents.
1 Act 21 April 1846 2 5. Purd. 1124. T Act 12 March 186931. Purd.1125. The act
2 Act 16 April 1849 2 3, Ibid. 17 April 1869 validated acknowledgments under
3 Aot 21 June 1839 213. Purd. 1126. their private seals, made prior to that date. °
4 Act 22 February 1802 21. Ibid. Pamph. 1144. See act 1 June 1891. Purd. 1125.
5 Ibid. @ 2. 8 Act 12 March 1869 2 2.
6 Act 9 March 1846 31. Ibid. 9 Thid. 2 3.
,
JUSTICES OF THE PEACE. 595
XI. CRIMINAL JURISDICTION.
1. Power to take Recognisances.
In all cases the party accused, on oath or affirmation, of any crime or misde-
meanor against the laws, shall be admitted to bail by one or more sufficient sureties,
to be taken before any judge, justice, mayor, recorder or alderman where the offence
charged has been committed, except such persons as are precluded from being
bailed by the constitution of this commonwealth: Provided also, That persons
aceused as aforesaid, of murder or manslaughter, shall only be admitted to bail by
the supreme court, or one of the judges thereof, or a president or associate law judge
of a court of common pleas: persons accused, as aforesaid, of arson, rape, mayhem,
sodomy, buggery, robbery or burglary, shall only be bailable by the supreme court,
the court of common pleas, or any of the judges thereof, or a mayor or recorder of
a city.)
The aldermen and the justices of the peace of the several counties of this com-
monwealth, shall be required to return to the clerk of the court of quarter sessiond
of the peace of the respective counties, all the recognisances entered into before
them by any person or persons charged with the commission of any crime, excepting
such cases as may be ended before an alderman or a justice of the peace under
existing laws, at least ten days before the commencement of the session of the court
to which they are made returnable respectively ; and in all cases where any recog-
nisances are entered into less than ten days before the commencement of the session
to which they are made returnable, the said aldermen and justices are required to
return the same, in the same manner as if this act had not been passed.”
It shall be the duty of all aldermen, justices of the peace and committing
magistrates, in this commonwealth, upon complaint being made in criminal cases
upon oath or affirmation of any person or persons, to enter such complaint upon
their dockets, with the name, residence and occupation, if any, of all defendants,
bail and witnesses, in every criminal case, and to return to the clerk of the court
of quarter sessions of the peace of the several counties respectively, a true tran-
script from the said docket within five days after the binding over, or committal of
any defendant or defendants, charged with any felony; and any wilful violation
of the requirements of this section is hereby declared a misdemeanor in office, and
on conviction thereof, the party so offending shall be fined in a sum not exceeding
three hundred dollars, and the costs of prosecution.®
2. Backing Warrants.
In case any person against whom a warrant may be issued by any judge or alder-
man of any city, or justice of the peace of any county in this commonwealth, for
any offence there committed, shall escape, go into, reside or be in any other city or
county out of the jurisdiction of the judge, alderman, justice or justices of the
city or county granting such warrant as aforesaid, it shall and may be lawful for,
and it is hereby declared to be the duty of any alderman, justice or justices of the
city or county where such person shall escape, go into, reside or be, upon proof
being made, upon oath or affirmation, of the handwriting of the judge, alderman,
justice or justices granting such warrant, to indorse his or their name or names on
such warrant, which shall be sufficient authority to the person or persons bring-
ing such warrant, and to all other persons to whom such warrant was originally
1 Act 31 March 1860 3 7. Purd. 546, A justice
may take bail, after commitment for trial. 6 W.
& 8.314. 2 Pars. 458. And see 7 W. 454. 5
Binn. 512. 1 Sm. 57 n. A recognisance taken
by a justice, to answer the charge of arson, is
coram non judice, and void. 2 U.S. Law Mag.
316
2 Act 8 May 1854 31. Purd. 548, There can
be no forfeiture of a recognisance, until it has
been returned in accordance with this act. 8
Phila, 373. See act 26 March 1869, as to returns
in [Adams] and Franklin counties, Pamph, 539 ;
extended to Bedford and Fulton counties, by act
3 April 1872, Pamph. 864; act 15 February 1870,
as to Crawford, Carbon and [Northampton]
counties, Pamph. 147; act 1 March 1870, as to
Somerset and [Schuylkill] counties, Pamph. 280;
act 28 March 1870, as to Allegheny county,
Pamph. 594; act 13 May 1871, as to Dauphin
and Lebanon counties, Pamph. 845; act 7 March
1872, asto York, Perry, Cumberland and Columbia
counties, Pamph. 244; act 9 May 1872, as to
Berks county, Pamph. 1168; and act 10 April
1873, as to Lancaster county, Pamph. 759. These
acts have been repealed as to the counties of
Adams, Northampton and Schuylkill, by acts 31
March 1866, Pamph. 186; 6 April 1876, Pampb.
186; and 29 April 1878, Pamph. 37.
3 Act 11 June 1882 91. Purd. 549. See act
9 April 1872, as to return of desertion cases.
596 JUSTICES OF THE PEACE.
directed, to execute the same in such other city or county, out of the jurisdiction
of the alderman, justice or justices, granting such warrant as aforesaid, and to appre-
hend and carry such offender before the alderman, justice or justices who indorsed
such warrant, or some other alderman, justice or justices of such other city and
county where such warrant was indorsed. And in case the offence for which such
offender shall be so apprehended, shall be bailable in law by an alderman or justice
of the peace, and such offender shall be willing and ready to give bail for his
appearance at the next court of general jail delivery or quarter sessions, to be held
in and for the city and county where the offence was committed, such alderman,
justice or justices shall and may take such bail for his appearance, in the same
manner as the alderman or justice of the peace of the proper city or county might
have done; and the said alderman, justice or justices of the peace of such other
city or county so taking bail, shall deliver or transmit such recognisance and
other proceeding to the clerk of the court of general jail delivery or quarter
sessions, where such offender is required to appear by virtue of such recognisance ;
and such recognisance and other proceedings shall be as good and effectual in law
as if the same had been entered into, taken or acknowledged in the proper county
where the offence was committed, and the same proceedings shall be had therein.
And in case the offence for which such offender shall be apprehended in any other
city or county, shall not be bailable in law by an alderman or justice of the peace,
or such offender shall not give bail for his appearance at the proper court having
cognisance of his crime, to the satisfaction of the alderman or justice before whom
he shall be brought, then the constable or other person so apprehending such
offender, shall carry and convey him before one of the aldermen or justices of the
peace of the proper city or county where such offence was committed, there to be
dealt with according to law."
No action of trespass, or false imprisonment, or information, or indictment, shall
be brought, sued, commenced, exhibited or proseeuted by any person, against the
alderman, justice or justices, who shall indorse such warrant, for or by reason of
his or their indorsing the same, but such person shall be at liberty to bring or
prosecute his or their action or suit against the alderman or justice who originally
granted the warrant.’
3. Settlement of Criminal Cases.
In all cases where a person shall, on the complaint of another, be bound by recog-
nisance to appear, or shall, for want of security, be committed, or shall be indicted
for an assault and battery or other misdemeanor, to the injury and damage of the
party complaining, and not charged to have been done with intent to commit a
felony, or not being an infamous crime, and for which there shall also be a remedy
by action, if the party complaining shall appear before the magistrate who may have
taken recognisance or made the commitment, or before the court in which the
indictment shall be, and acknowledge to have received satisfaction for such injury
and damage, it shall be lawful for the magistrate, in his discretion, to discharge the
recognisance which may have been taken for the &ppearance of the defendant, or in
case of committal, to discharge the prisoner, or for the court also where such pro-
ceeding has been returned to the court, in their discretion, to order a nolle prosequt
to be entered on the indictment, as the case may require, upon payment of costs:
Provided, That this act shall not extend to any assault and battery, or other misde-
meanor, committed by or on any officer or minister of justice.®
4. Holding Inquisitions.
Tn all cases where by law the coroner of any county is required to hold an mquest
over a dead body, it shall be lawful for a justice of the peace of the proper county
to hold the same where there is no lawfully appointed coroner, or he is absent from
the county, unable to attend, or his office is held more than ten miles distant from the
place where the death occurred or the body found, and said justice shall have
1 Act 31 March 1860 3 3. Purd. 545, Awar- fender in the jail of the county where the war-
rant issued by a justice of the peace in one rant was indorsed. 1 Gr. 218.
county, and indorsed by a justice in another 2 Act 31 March 1860 3 4. Purd. 546.
county, charging a misdemeanor to have been 3 Ibid. 3 9. Ibid. 547. See tit. “ Compounding
committed in the county whence the warrant Offences.”
issued, will not justify the detention of the of-
JUSTICES OF THE PEAOR. 597
like power to select, summon and compel the attendance of jurors and witnesses,
and shall receive like fees and tax like costs, and the inquest shall have like force
and effect in law: Provided, That no fees or costs shall be allowed or paid said
justice or inquest, until the proceedings are submitted to the court of quarter
sessions of the proper county, (and) the said court shall adjudge that there was
reasonable cause for holding said inquest, and approve the same.!
XII. Justriczs’ courts.
In the counties of Beaver, Bradford, Clarion, Crawford, Erie, Forest, Lawrence,
Lehigh, Luzerne, Mercer, Northampton, Northumberland, Perry, Pike, Snyder,
Union, Washington, Wayne and Wyoming, justices of the peace have been in-
vested with the power to hold justices’ courts, for the trial of petty offences, to
wit: blasphemy, disturbance of public meetings, lewdness, cruelty to animals, sell-
ing unwholesome provisions or adulterated provisions or medicines, revealing
telegraphic dispatches, assault and battery, larceny (where the value does not
exceed $10), cheating innkeepers and boarding-house keepers by false pretences,
firing of woods, malicious trespasses, and cutting down timber trees on the land of
another. They are also invested with the power to try cases of affray, and offences
against the liquor laws, in Bradford and Mercer counties,”
The act of 1861 provides, that whenever any person shall be brought before a
justice, on a warrant issued by said justice, founded on the oath or information of
the party aggrieved, or of some one acting for the party aggrieved, the compiaint
or information shall be fully read aloud in the hearing of the defendant or party
accused ; and if the defendant shall plead guilty to the charge against him, the
justice shall proceed to inquire into the circumstances of the case, so far as he
shall think best for a proper understanding of the defendant’s guilt, and shall pro-
ceed to pass sentence upon the defendant, which sentence shall have the full
force and effect of a sentence pronounced by the court of quarter sessions, in like
cases; and the defendant shall be committed to the jail of the county until the
sentence be complied with.
If the defendant shall plead not guilty to the offence charged, and shall at the
same time signify his determination to be tried by a jury of six, before the said
justice, the justice shall make an entry to that effect upon his docket, and the
defendant shall then enter into recognisance with good and sufficient surety or
sureties, conditioned for his appearance before the said justice, at the ensuing
monthly session, and not to depart without leave, until discharged according to law;
but if the defendant shall not enter into such recognisance as aforesaid, it shall be
the duty of the constable to keep him or her safely, until duly discharged by course
of law, and in either case the justice shall proceed to the trial of the cause in the
manner pointed out in the following sections of this act ; but if the defendant shall
not signify his or her determination to be tried before said justice, the justice
shall proceed with the said defendant as if this act had not been passed.‘
1 Act 27 May 1841 3 15..Purd. 401. Inde-
pendently of this act, a justice has no right to
hold an inquisition super vieum corporis. 6 Whart.
269, 270. The jurisdiction is purely statutory,
and must appear on the face of the proceedings.
2 Kulp 127. 2 Del. Co. R. 446. This act is
repealed astv Northampton county, by act 1 May
1861; and the coroner of that county is thereby
empowered to appoint deputies in such sections
of the county as he may deem necessary. Pamph.
560. So is the coroner of Lancaster county, by
act 8 April 1852, Pamph. 246; the coroner of
Schuylkill, by act 14 February 1863, Pamph. 30;
and the coroner of Chester, by act 17 March 1864,
Pamph. 21, The act 19 April 1856 provides that,
in Allegheny county, justices shall not hold
inquests, except it be impracticable to obtain the
personal attendance of the coroner, after notice
given to him, or reasonable and proper efforts
a to give him notice of the death. Pamph.
9 Purd. 1154, And see act 12 April 1867,
as to Potter county, Pamph. 1161; act 15 April
1867, as to Indiana county, Pamph. 1264; act 11
April 1868, as to Butler and Armstrong counties,
Pamph. 858; act 19 February 1870, as to Tioga
and Susquehanna counties, Pamph. 204; act 3
April 1869, as to certain boroughs in the county
of Cambria, Pamph. 695; act 10 May 1871, as to
the borough of Pleasantville, Venango county,
Pamph. 679; and act 24 May 1871, as to Phe-
nixville, in Chester county, Pamph. 1091. These
acts are constitutional, 101 Penn. St. 560, except
so far as they are compulsory on the defendant tc
submit to such mode of trial; 10 Phila. 496;
but he may elect to be so tried: 101 Penn. St
560. So much of the act of 1861 as required
justices to hold monthly courts, in such cases, was
repealed by the act of 5 April 1862, which pro-
vided that they should hear and determine the
same forthwith. Purd. 1156.
3 Act 1 May 1861 2 2. Purd. 1154.
* Ibid. 2 3.
598 JUSTICES OF THE PEACH.
Whenever a defendant shall signify his or her determination to be tried by a
jury of six, before the justice of the peace, for any of the offences of which
a justice of the peace shall have jurisdiction, according to the provisions of the first
section of this act, in the manner pointed out in the foregoing section, the said jus-
tice, upon such demand, is hereby required to continue the cause to the ensuing
monthly court, and to issue a venire, directed to any constable of the proper
borough, city or township, where the said cause is to be tried, commanding him to
summon six good and lawful men, citizens of said township, city or borough,’ and
having the qualifications of electors therein, who shall be in no wise of kin to either
defendant or complainant, nor in any manner interested, who shall be chosen as
follows, to wit: The justice shall write in a panel the names of eighteen persons,
from which the defendant or his agent or attorney shall strike one name, the com-
plainant or prosecutor one, and so on alternately until each shall have stricken six
names; and the remaining six shall constitute the jury, to be and appear before
such justice at the time to which said cause shall have been adjourned, to serve as
a jury for the trial of such cause: Provided, That in case either party shall neglect
or refuse to aid in striking the jury as aforesaid, the justice shall strike the same
in behalf of such party.?
It shall be the duty of such constable to make service of said venire, and to return
the same, with the names of the persons by him summoned, at the time appointed
for the trial of the cause.®
It shall be the further duty of such constable, to be in attendance on said court,
at the time appointed for said trial, and during the progress of the same; and if, by
reason of challenge for cause, sickness or other disability, the persons whose names
shall be returned by the vendre, or any of them, shall not be impannelled as jurors,
the said constable shall fill the panel from the bystanders, as is done by the sheriffs,
in the courts of common pleas; and the said constable shall be allowed for his
attendance on said court, one dollar per day, to be taxed in the bill of costs; and
at the close of the trial. the jury shall be conducted by the constable to some private
and convenient place, where they may deliberately and without interruption consult
upon their verdict.*
The competence and credibility of witnesses, the form of the oaths to jurors and
witnesses, and the constable who shall wait upon the jury, shall be the same as in
the trial of the same offences in the court of quarter sessions, and the jury shall
have the same jurisdiction and control over the payment of costs: Provided, That
‘the county shall in no case be liable for either the prosecutor’s or the defendant’s
bill of costs ; and the justice, in case the jury shall, by their verdict, direct that
the prosecutor or the defendant shall pay the whole or any part of the costs, shall
proceed to pass sentence accordingly, and the party who shall be thus sentenced,
shall be committed until the sentence be complied with.®
The verdict of the jury shall be final and conclusive upon all the questions of
fact involved therein, and no writ of certiorari, or of error or appeal, shall be allowed
for the review of such case of fact so tried by the jury; and in case the proceed-
ings shall be removed to a higher court upon certiorarz,® or otherwise, the district-
attorney shall thereafter conduct the proceedings in behalf of the commonwealth,
and his fee shall be the same as upon indictments formed by the grand jury, to be
taxed and paid as the other costs of the case; and if the proceedings shall be re-
versed on any certiorari or writ of error, sued out on behalf of the defendant, on
account of any defect in the statement of the offence with which the party is
charged, the court shall send the proceedings back to the justice for a new trial,
and direct the information or accusation in said case to be amended by the district-
attorney and sworn to by the prosecutor, and thereupon the defendant shall be
required to enter his plea to such amended information or accusation, and thereupon
tle new trial shall proceed before the justice as on the former hearing.”
~ It is error, if this do not appear. 10 Phila. by the court or the district-attorney. 10 Phila.
460. 460. In Bradford county, a reversal on certiorart
2 Act 1 May 1861 34. Purd. 1155. is not to operate as an acquittal. See act 28
8 Ibid. 2 5. February 1868. Purd. 1156, 4
4 bid. 2 6. 7 Act 1 May 1861 2 8, as amended by act 5
5 Ibid. ¢ 7. April 1862. Purd. 1155.
6 A certicrari cannot be issued, unless allowed
JUSTICES OF THE PEACE, 599
Whenever the jury shall render a verdict of guilty, the justice shall proceed to
pass sentence upon the defendant according to law, and with the like effect as if
the defendant had pleaded guilty or been convicted in the court of quarter sessions ;
and any sentence of imprisonment which may be imposed, shall only be inflicted in
the jail of the proper county ; and all fines imposed shall be collected and paid
into the school fund of the school district in which the offence was committed ; and
it shall be the duty of the justice to receive the amount of the fine and pay it into
the treasury of the proper district ; and any neglect to pay the same as aforesaid,
shal] be considered a misdemeanor in office.!
Ix al! cases which shall be tried by a jury, under the provisions of this act, the
justice of the peace trying the same shall be entitled to a fee of two dollars, and
each juror shall be entitled to fifty cents per day, to be taxed as costs.?
When any person shall be summoned to attend as a juror, and shall fail to attend
at the time and place specified in the venire, having no reasonable excuse to assign
for such failure, every such person shall be fined in any sum not exceeding ten
dollars, for which fine the justice of the peace shall render judgment in the name
of the commonwealth, and issue execution therefor; and when collected, shall pay
the same into the township, borough, or city school treasury, for the use of the
common schools therein.® : ;
If the defendant shall plead not guilty, and demand a trial by jury, * * * the
justice shall make an entry to that effect in his docket, and require the defendant
to enter into a recognisance, with good and sufficient surety or sureties, conditioned
for his or her appearance before said justice, not less than four nor more than ten
days thereafter, unless the defendant shall then make affidavit that he or she can-
not, within the longest time herein mentioned, procure the necessary witnesses for
his or her defence, when the hearing shall be continued by the justice to such time
as will give the defendant a reasonable and fair opportunity to procure the evidence ;
and if the defendant shall not enter into such recognisance, and the day of trial shall
be postponed for a longer period than ten days, the constable may commit the defend-
ant to the jail of the county for safe-keeping until the day of trial, and for such
service he shall be allowed the fees now provided by law: Provided, That if the
office of the justice shall be within ten miles of the jail of said county, the con-
stable may in every case in which bail is not given, commit the said defendant to
jail for safe-keeping.*
The jury provided for in the act to which this is a supplement, shall be selected
and struck on the day on which the defendant shall first be brought before said
justice, if both the parties are present in person, or by attorney, but if the defend-
ant desires counsel, he shall have a reasonable time to procure such counsel, and in
the mean time he shall be securely kept by the constable, and the day of trial shall
in all cases be computed from the time of choosing said jury: Provided, That if,
after said jury is struck, both parties desire to proceed to trial immediately, the
justice shall make an entry to that effect in his docket, and forthwith proceed with
said trial.’ :
If the prosecutor in any criminal proceeding before a justice of the peace shall,
in the information made before the justice, charge the defendant with any crime
or misdemeanor not triable before a justice and a jury of six, under the provisions of
said act, and the defendant shall be required to answer to the charge in the court
of quarter sessions of the county, and shall there be convicted only of an offence
triable before a justice of the peace and a jury of six, the defendant shall not be
liable to pay the costs of the prosecutor or other witnesses for the commonwealth,
but the same shall be paid by the prosecutor, in all cases of conviction after
the passagé of this act, and he shall be sentenced by the court to pay the same:
Provided, That the provisions of this act shall not apply to the county of Pot-
ter: Provided, That if the president judge of the court trying the cause shall
1 Act 1 May 1861 3 9. Purd. 1155. necessarily required in the trial of the cause, after
2 Ibid. 310. By act 21 February 1872, they the day in which the jury is selected, in addition
are allowed an additional fee of $1.50, in all cases to the other fees allowed by law. Act 28 Febru-
tried by a jury. Pamph. 129. In Bradford ary 1868. Purd. 1157.
county, the pay of jurors is fixed at one dollar 3 Act 1 May 1861 2 11. Purd. 1156.
per day; and the justices and constables are 4 Act 5 April 1862 3 2. Ibid.
each to receive two dollars per day, for each day 5 Ibid. 2 3.
600 JUSTICES OF THE PEACE.
certify that the prosecutor had good cause to believe, at the time he made the
information, that an offence not triable before a justice and a jury of six had been
committed by the defendant or defendants, as alleged in the information, then and
in that case, the prosecutor shall have his costs taxed and paid as if this act had
not passed.
The several justices of the peace in and for the counties of Bradford, Perry,
Indiana, Warren and Erie, in case of the disagreement of the jury, under the pro-
visions of an act, entitled “an act to change the mode of criminal proceedings in
Erie and Union counties,” approved May 1st, 1861, or its several supplements
thereto, shall have power, and are hereby authorized and empowered, under the
same rules and regulations, to proceed to draw another jury and proceed to trial in
the same manner: Provided, That the said justice may continue the same from
time to time, as he may deem proper, always requiring the defendant or defendants
to enter into a recognisance in a sufficient sum for his, her or their appearance at
the time specified.?
XIII. SuMMARY CONVICTIONS.
If any person shall be charged on oath or affirmation before the mayor or police
magistrate of the central station of the city of Philadelphia,* with being a pro-
fessional thief, burglar or pickpocket, and who shall have been arrested by the police
authorities at any steamboat-landing, railroad-depot, church, banking institution,
broker’s office, place of public amusement, auction room, store or crowded thorough-
fare in the city of Philadelphia, and if it shall be proven to the satisfaction of the
said mayor or police magistrate, appointed by the mayor for the central station, by
sufficient testimony, that he or she was frequenting or attending such place or places
for an unlawful purpose, he or she shall be committed by the said mayor or said
police magistrate to the jail of the county of Philadelphia, for a term not exceeding
ninety days, there to be kept at hard labor, or in the discretion of the said mayor
or police magistrate of said central station, he or she shall be required to enter
security for his or her good behavior for a period not exceeding one year.*
Any person who may or shall feel aggrieved at any such act, judgment or deter-
mination of the said mayor or police magistrate of said central station, in and
concerning the execution of this act, may apply to any judge of the court of quarter
sessions for a writ of Aabeas corpus, and upon return thereof, there shall be a re-
hearing of the evidence, and the judge may either discharge, modify or confirm the
commitment.®
It shall be the duty of the constables, and of the several police constables, officers,
or detectives, appointed by the proper authorities, in the counties of Erie, Luzerne,
Susquehanna, Pike and Crawford, and they are hereby authorized and required, to
arrest any professional thief, pickpocket or burglar, who may be found at any
steamboat-landing, railroad-depot, church, banking institution, broker’s office, place
of public amusement, auction room or common thoroughfare, in the city of Erie, in
Corry, in the county of Erie, and in Meadville or Titusville, in the county of Craw-
ford, and carry them forthwith to the mayor of the city, or burgess of the borough,
or a police magistrate, to be appointed by the mayor, burgess, or city or town council
respectively ; and if it shall be proven, to the satisfaction of the mayor, burgess or
other police magistrate, by sufficient testimony, that the person so arrested was
attending or frequenting such place or places for an unlawful purpose, he or she
1 Act 11 April 1868 31. Purd. 1157.
vagabonds, 42 Penn. St.89. 45 How. Pr. 97.
2 Act 12 March 1869 3.1. Ibid.
By the act 13 April 1867, Purd. 507, the act is
5 By act 12 April 1867, this jurisdiction is
extended to all the magistrates of the city of
Philadelphia. Pamph. 1210, The law is extended
to the cities of Lancaster, Harrisburg, Pittsburgh
and Allegheny by act 20 March 1863, Pamph.
173. And to the borough of Norristown, by act
12 March 1867. Pamph. 405. And see act 21
March 1866, as to the counties of Erie, Crawford,
Venengo and Warren. Pamph, 259.
4 Act 13 March 1862 31. Purd. 531. This act
is constitutional; the right of trial by jury,
secured by the bill of rights, does not interfere
with the summary conviction of rogues and
extended to the arrest and commitments and pro-
fessional counterfeiters and forgers. And by the
act 16 March 1864, Purd. 531, it is extended to
the arrest of professional thieves, burglars or
pickpookets, at any hotel, restaurant, auction-
sale in private residence, passenger car, or at
any other gathering of people, whether few or
many, in the cities of Philadelphia, Allegheny,
Lancaster, Harrisburg and Pittsburgh.
5 Act 13 March 1862 21. Purd. 531. The
case is to be reheard upon the evidence ad-
dressed to the magistrate. 26 Pitts L. J. 81.
JUSTICES OF THE PEAOR. 601
shall be committed by the said mayor, burgess or police magistrate, to the jail of
the proper county, for a term not exceeding ninety days, at hard labor, or, at his
discretion, require the person to give security for his or her good behavior, for a
period not exceeding one year, and require the person to pay the costs incident to
his or her arrest, examination and commitment.
The conductors on the several railroads, while passing through either of the
counties aforesaid, shall have like power to arrest any one who may be found steal-
ing, or picking the pockets of passengers, or others, or commiting any breach of the
peace on the cars, and detain him or her till reaching any one of the places, Erie,
Corry, Meadville or Titusville, and then deliver him or her to a constable, or other
police authority, to be taken before one of the authorities mentioned in the pre-
ceding section, to be dealt with in like manner as is there provided for real or
suspicious offenders ; and the several magistrates before named shall have power
to order the detention of the person or persons so arrested, for a period not exceed-
ing ten days, if it shall be deemed necessary to obtain the requisite testimony of
absent witnesses to establish their guilt.? :
If any person shall be found, by any constable, police officer or detective, staying
or loitering in or around any steamboat-landing, railroad-depot, gambling or drinking
saloon, restaurant, banking-house, broker’s office or any place of public amusement,
crowded thoroughfare or other place of public resort, in any city or incorporated
borough, within the counties of Erie, Crawford, Venango and Warren, having no
apparent business, trade or occupation, and without any visible avocation or means
of ‘subsistence, it shall be the duty of said officer to arrest such person, and take
him or her, as soon as may be, before the mayor of any city, the burgess of any
borough, or any convenient magistrate of the place where the arrest is made; and
upon due proof of the fact, by one or more witnesses, or by confession, and upon
the party arrested failing to furnish any reasonable or satisfactory account of his or
her name, residence, character or business at that place, he or she shall be deemed
and taken to be a vagrant, and shall be subject to all the existing laws respecting
vagrants now in force in this commonwealth ; and the mayor of any city and the
burgess of every borough within the said counties are hereby vested with full
authority and jurisdiction to execute all the provisions of this act, and all existing
laws relative to vagrants.®
After the arrest of any such person as is hereinbefore described, and upon the
oath or affirmation of the arresting officer or other person, that he has reason to
suspect, and does suspect such person of being a gambler, burglar, thief or pick-
pocket, it shall be lawful for the mayor, burgess or justice before whom such person
is brought, to direct the officer, in his presence, or that of some disinterested per-
son named by him, to search the person, the baggage, and place of residence or
resort of such suspected person, and return to the presiding magistrate everything
he may find or take, deemed confirmatory of such suspicion, and everything not so
deemed shall be left with or returned to the owner; and if, upon said examination
and search, such mayor, burgess or other magistrate shall be satisfied such sus-
pected person is a professional gambler, thief, pickpocket or burglar, he shall have
power so to render his judgment, and then to sentence such party to pay a fine of
any sum not exceeding one hundred dollars, and the costs of prosecution, and to
undergo imprisonment, in the county jail, for any period not exceeding three
months, or to require such party to enter into recognisance, and give bail for his
or her appearance at the next court of quarter sessions in such sum as he may fix;
and upon the failure of any such party to comply with said sentence, or give the
required recognisance and bail, to commit him or her to the jail of the county; of
all of which doings the said magistrate shall keep a record, and transmit a certified
copy of the same to the clerk of the quarter sessions, at or before the next suc-
ceeding term.*
In all cases of summary conviction in this commonwealth, before a magistrate or
court not of record, either party may, within five days after such conviction, appeal
to the court of quarter sessions of the county in which such magistrate shall reside,
1 Act 12 March 1866 32. Purd. 531. Seeact 2? Act 12 March 1866 23. Purd. 532.
11 April 1866, as to the city of Reading ; Pamph. 3 Act 21 March 1866 ¢ 1. Ibid. 2068.
745; and acts 21 March 1866, and 11 April 1866, 4 Ibid. 3 4.
as to Franklin county, Pamph. 259, 720.
602 JUSTICES OF THE PEACE.
or court not of record shall be held, upon allowance of the said court of quarter
sessions, or any judge thereof, upon cause shown; Provided, That all appeals
from summary conviction, shall be upon such terms as to payment of costs, and
entering bail, as the court or judge allowing the appeal shall direct."
XIV. The following is an exact copy of an alderman’s commission. The words
here printed in italic, are writtten in the original. The rest of the commission is
printed.
PENNSYLVANIA, as.
In the name and by the authority of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania:
DAVID R. PORTER,
[Arms of the state.]
Governor of the said Commonwealth.
David R. Porter,
[Seal of commonwealth. ]
To John Binns, of the city of Philadelphia, Esquire : Whereas, it appears by the return
made and transmitted to me, according to law, that you, the said John Binns, have been
duly elected an alderman of Walnut ward, of the city of Philadelphia; Now know you,
that in conformity with the constitution and laws of the commonwealth, in such cases
made and provided, I do, by these presents, commission you to be an alderman in and
for the said Walnut ward of the city of Philadelphia ; hereby giving and granting unto
you full right and title to have, and to execute all and singular the powers, jurisdictions
and authorities, and to receive and enjoy all and singular the emoluments, to an alder-
man lawfully belonging, or in any wise appertaining, by virtue of the constitution and
laws of this commonwealth.
* To have and to hold this commission, and the office hereby granted unto you, the said
John Binns, for the term of five years, to be computed from the day of the date of these
presents, if you shall so long behave yourself well.
Given under my hand, and the great seal of the state, at Harrisburg, this fourteenth day
of April, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and forty, and of the com-
monwealth the sixty-fourth.
By the Governor. [szaL.]
FR'S R. SHUNK,
Secretary of the Commonwealth.
On the back of this commission is the followiug written indorsement :
PHILADELPHIA, ss.
I, George Smith, recorder of deeds, &c., for the city and county of Philadelphia, do
certify, that on the 22d day of April, a. p. 1840, the within-named John Binns, Esq.,
personally appeared before me, and by virtue of a commission of dedimus potestatem, to
me directed, was duly sworn to eee the constitution of the United States, and the
constitution of the state of Pennsylvania, and to execute and perform the duties of
the office of alderman of Walnut ward of the city of Philadelphia, with fidelity, and
according to the best of his judgment and abilities. And I further certify that the within
age and the said official oath, are recorded in my office, in commission book G. S.,
o. 2, page —.
[spaL.j Witness my hand and seal of office, the 22d day of April, a. p. 1840.
G. Suirn, Ree,
XV. A justice of the peace can do no official act out of his proper district or
county.’ A justice of the peace commissioned within a certain district and county,
cannot act under his commission, upon a division of the county, if he reside in the
new county, though his district remain in it entire. By the division of a county,
the commissions of justices, who are thereby thrown into the new county, are
vacated, unless provision against it be made in the act dividing the former county.
A justice must reside and keep his office within the limits of the district for which
he is commissioned.‘
An alderman or justice of the peace is competent to administer any oath required
to support any collateral or interlocutory step found necessary in a cause, in the
1 Act 17 April 1876 2 1. Purd. 1949. 8 4 Y. 399.
278. &R.43. 1 Ash. 131, 4 6 Luz. L. Reg. 89.
JUSTICES OF THE PEACE. 603
common law or orphans’ courts." As long as the commission of a justice is in force,
he possesses an authority to administer oaths, of which he cannot divest himself;
and though he do not subscribe himself as a justice to a deposition, he shall be
deemed to have acted officially.? The letters “J. P.” are a sufficient designation
of the official character of a justice of the peace.’
The offence of a justice acting as agent for either party who sues before him, is
indictable.‘
Trespass has been held to lie against a justice of the peace who issued execution
against the body of a person privileged from imprisonment.’ Many of the proper
acts of a justice are merely ministerial ; in the performance of these, if he wrong-
fully injure an individual, he is liable as if he were not charged with judicial fune.
tions.®
An incoming justice has power to dispose of all unfinished business pending
before his predecessor in office.’ A justice whose term of office has expired, cannot
certify a transcript for the purpose of creating a lien; he must deliver his docket
to his successor in office.®
Justices of the Peace, Actions against.
I. Actions against justices regulated. III. Judicial authorities.
IE. Proceedings on neglect to pay over the IV. Notice of intended action against a justice.
amount of a judgment.
I. Act 21 Maren 1772. Purd. 1150.
WHEREAS, justices of the peace may be discouraged in the execution of their
office, by vexatious actions brought against them, for or by reason of small and
involuntary errors in their proceedings : and whereas, it is necessary that they shou!d
be (as far as is consistent with justice, and the safety and liberty of the subjects
over whom their authority extends) rendered safe in the execution of the said office
and trust: and whereas, it is also necessary that the subject should be protected
from all wilful and oppressive abuse of the several laws committed to the care
and execution of the said justices of the peace: Be ct enacted,
Szor. 1. No writ shall be sued out against, nor any copy of any process, at the
suit of a subject, shall be served on any justice of the peace, for anything by
him done in the execution of his office, until notice, in writing, of such intended
writ or process shall have been delivered to him, or left at the usual place of his
abode, by the party, his attorney or agent, who intends to sue, or cause the same
to be sued out or served, at least thirty days before the suing out or serving the
same ; in which notice shall be clearly and explicitly contained the cause of action,
which the said party hath or claimeth to have, against such justice of the peace ;
on the back of which notice shall be indorsed the name of such attorney or agent,
together with the place of his abode; who shall be entitled to the fee of twenty
shillings for the preparing and serving such notice, and no more.
Sxcr. 2. It shall and may be lawful to and for such justice of the peace, at any
time within thirty days after such notice given as aforesaid, to tender amends to
the party complaining, or his or her agent or attorney; and in case the same is not
accepted, to plead such tender in bar to any action to be brought against him,
grounded on such writ or process, together with the plea of not guilty, and any
other plea, with leave of the court ; and if, upon issue joined thereon, the jury shall
find the amends so tendered to have been sufficient, they shall give a verdict for
the defendant ; and in such case, or in case the plaintiff shall become nonsuit, or
ehall discontinue his or her action, or in case judgment shall be given for such
defendant or defendants, upon demurrer, such justice shall be entitled to the like
costs as he would have been entitled unto, in case he had pleaded the general issue
12 Am. L, J. 224. 5 2 Johns. Cas. 249.
2 3 Binn. 539. 6 9 Penn. St. 72.
§ 32 Penn. St. 514, 7 2 Luz. L. Reg. 236.
#1458. & R. 158. 8 1 Pears. 194. And see 2 Pars. 297.
604 JUSTICES OF THE PEACE.
only; and if, upon issue so joined, the jury shall find that no amends were ten-
dered, or that the same were insufficient, and also against the defendant or defend-
ants ou such other plea or pleas, then they shall give a verdict for the plaintiff, and
such damages as they shall think proper, which he or she shall recover, together
with his or her costs of suit. : So
Sect. 3. No such plaintiff shall recover any verdict against such justice, in any
case where an action shall be grounded on any act of the defendant, as justice of
the peace, unless it is proved, upon the trial of such action, that such notice was
given as aforesaid; but in default thereof, such justice shall recover a verdict and
costs as aforesaid. ;
Sxor. 4. In case such justice shall neglect to tender any amends, or shall have
tendered insufficient amends, before the action brought, it shall and may be lawful
for him, by leave of the court where such action shall depend, at any time before
issue joined, to pay into court such sum of money as he shall see fit; whereupon
such proceedings, orders and judgments shall be had, made and given, in and
by such court, as in other actions where the defendant is allowed to pay money
into court.
Szcr. 5. No evidence shall be permitted to be given by the plaintiff, on the trial
of any such action as aforesaid, of any cause of action, except such as is contained
in the notice hereby directed to be given. :
Sxcr. 7. Provided always, That no action shall be brought against any justice
of the peace, for anything done in the execution of his office, or against any con-
stable or other officer, or person or persons acting as aforesaid, unless commenced
within six mouths after the act committed.
II. Aor 28 Marcu 1820. Purd. 1153.
Szct. 8. Where any alderman or justice of the peace shall receive the amount
of a judgment rendered by him, or any part thereof, and shall refuse to pay the
same over to the plaintiff or his agent, or the person to whom it is owing, such
refusal shall be a misdemeanor in office; and, besides the remedy for such misde-
meanor, the party aggrieved may petition the court of common pleas of the proper
county where the justice resides, setting forth the refusal of the alderman or justice
of the peace to pay over the moneys by him collected, and the said court shall
take immediate order therein, by directing a notice to issue, directed to the said
alderman or justice, returnable forthwith, or at such certain day as will suit the
convenience of the court, setting forth the contents of the petition, and on return
of the said notice and due proof of the service thereof, if the said justice appears
in pursuance of the notice, and admits the facts set forth in the petition, or shall
neglect or refuse to appear, in either case, the said court shall enter judgment for
the amount so retained by the justice, with interest from the receipt thereof, and
four dollars to the party aggrieved, besides costs; but should the facts stated in the
petition be disputed by the alderman or justice, the said court shall, upon his
appearance, form an issue in such manner as is calculated to do justice to the con-
tending parties, and the whole issue shall be fully and fairly tried, and judgment
shall be entered on the verdict of the jury, which shall be final and conclusive
between the parties; and on judgment being rendered against any alderman or
justice of the peace in manner aforesaid, for refusing to pay over money by him
received, execution shall forthwith issue at the instance of the complainant, without
any stay: Provided, The court before whom any issue is tried pursuant to this
section shall have power to decree touching the costs of such issue, as to right and
justice shall appertain.
III. The act of 1772 applies to suits before magistrates! And therefore, a notice
is necessary in an action brought before a justice of the peace, to recover the pen-
alty for taking illegal fees ;? and for the penalty for marrying a minor, without
the consent of the parent or guardian.’ If the suit be brought before a justice, it
must appear by his record, that notice was duly given; otherwise his judgment
158. & R. 299. Penn. St. 273. 1 Ash. 60.
2 Tbid. 44, 299, 12 Ibid. 75. 7 W.491. 38 34 Binn. 20. 3S. & R. 295.
JUSTICES OF THE PEACE. 605
will be reversed on certiorari. The statute, however, has no application to an
action on a justice’s official bond?
A justice of the peace is entitled to notice, under the act, whenever the act com-
plained of was done by him, by virtue of his office.’ Although the justice has
acted illegally, yet if he have a general jurisdiction of the subject, and intended to
act, or assumed to act as a magistrate, he is within the protection of the act.‘
Therefore, if a magistrate cause one who was travelling on Sunday, to be arrested
on his own view, he is entitled to notice.® It may be laid down as a general rule,
that wherever the officer has acted honestly, though mistakenly ; where he supposed
he was in the execution of his duty, although he had no authority to act; he is
entitled to the protection of the act of assembly.* So, in a suit by the adminis-
trator of a constable, against a justice, to recover back money alleged to have been
received by him as a justice of the peace, by fraud and mistake, it was held, that
the defendant was entitled to notice.’ And where an action was brought against
an alderman, for issuing an execution upon the transcript of another alderman of
the same city, who was then in commission, and acting in his office ; it was held,
that he was entitled to notice, under the act of 1772, although his act was void,
and wholly without authority; it being done, nevertheless, by virtue of his office.’
But if the justice act merely under color of his office, and not by virtue of it, he
is not entitled to notice, under the statute ; as, if he issue a warrant of arrest, on a
criminal accusation, without probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation; the
ower to do which is expressly excepted from all the powers of the government,
by the bill of rights of Pennsylvania.
The notice of an intended action, need not state the kind of writ intended to be
issued, whether summons or capias ;° nor the kind of action, whether trespass or
case ;" nor the court in which the action is intended to be brought: notice, stating
that plaintiff would sue in the common pleas, is sufficient, although the action be
brought in the district court of the county: both those courts having jurisdiction
of the subject-matter." But if the notice state the kind of action intended to be
brought, and the action afterwards brought is of a different kind from that con-:
tained in the notice, the variance will be fatal on the trial ;” for, if the notice may
mislead, or if it be expressed in equivocal terms, it is bad. So, if a cireumstance
be unnecessarily set out in the notice—as the date of an act of assembly, which is
misstated—the plaintiff cannot recover.
The witness must identify the notice, and prove the time of service."* It need
not be delivered by the agent or attorney, but may be served by any messenger
employed for that purpose.” In computing the time for the service of the notice,
the rule is to include the first day and exclude the last.
It is not necessary, that the notice should have all the form and accuracy of a
declaration ; a substantial notice of the cause of action is alone required. A
notice to a justice, of an intended suit for the penalty of fifty dollars, for taking
illegal fees, need not specify what fees he was entitled to receive.” But the notice
must clearly and explicitly set forth the cause of action on accvunt of which the
plaintiff claims amends. A claim for two penalties for taking illegal fees may be
included in one notice.”
A notice directed to a justice, signed by the plaintiff, and thus indorsed—“ Notice
to J.8., Esquire; Henry Read, living in Poplar Lane, between 3d and 4th Streets,”
was held to be defective, in not stating that Henry Read was the agent of the
plaintiff, and in not containing anything from which it might be inferred that he
was his agent, having authority to receive a tenderof amends.* Whether it be
essential that the name and abode of the plaintiff’s attorney or agent should
1 2 Phila. 39. 137 T. R. 631. 4 Binn. 26.
2 69 Penn. St. 260. 141 Bro. 65. 7 W. 297.
3 4 Binn. 20. 165 7 W. & S. 362. 13 Penn. St. 9.
458. & R. 302. 16 1 Penn. St. 403.
5 Thid. 299, 7138, & R. 420. ;
6 Ibid. 10. B. 827. 18 16 Penn. St. 14. And see 29 Ibid. 524-5.
T2R, 208. 19 128. & R. 148. 7 W. 298, 491. 34 Penn. St
8 Hubert v. Mitchell, Dist. Court, Phila., 19 324. 38 Ibid. 273.
March 1849. MS, : 20178. & R.75.
§ Bald. 602. 213 W. 144. 34 Penn, St. 324. And see3 EB
10 4 Binn. 25. & Bl. 725. 1 Chest. Co. R. 239.
U6 Ibid. 85. 128. & R. 148. 22 38 Penn. St. 278. See 10 Ibid. 139.
2 3 W. 317, 358. & R. 517.
606 JUSTICES OF THE PEACE.
be written on the back of the notice, if it be sufficiently inserted on its face, has
not been determined! But it would seem, that this act is to be strictly construed,’
The indorsement on the notice of the name and residence of the plaintiff's attorney,
is equivalent to an assertion that he is the agent of the plaintiff, and authorized to
receive amends.’ If the plaintiff himself give the notice, the indorsement of the
name and residence of his attorney is unnecessary.*
A notice served by the plaintiff himself, and indorsed by an attorney of another
county, from that in which suit was brought, is sufficient, the act not requiring the
attorney to be of the proper county.6 Service of the notice by the plaintiff himself,
will not dispense with the necessity of his signature, or that of his attorney, to
the notice. If the plaintiff himself sign the notice, and no attorney be indorsed,
the abode of the plaintiff should be set forth.’ A notice indorsed, “ T. B., of
Washington, is my attorney,” was held sufficient ; the notice being given in Wash-
ington county, and the seat of justice, where the attorney resided, being of the
same name. But a notice subscribed thus—‘' J. L., attorney for T. K., No. 79 So.
5th St.,” is not a sufficient notice of the attorney’s place of abode; a subscription
of this sort would indeed be evidence that the party was there when he wrote it,
but it is not evidence, under the act of assembly, that it is his place of abode,
which must be expressly stated. So, where a notice to a justice was signed by the
plaintiff’s attorney, and dated at Wilkesbarre, but there was no indorsement of his
name, neither was it said, in any part of the notice, or on the back of it, that he
resided at Wilkesbarre, it was held to be insufficient. The fee of twenty shillings,
for preparing and serving the notice, is to be charged in the bill of costs, and paid
by the defendant, upon a recovery against him."
In demands founded on torts, and sounding in damages, any sum of money may
be treated as amends, if, sufficient in amount; of which the jury are to judge.”
payment of any sum accepted as satisfaction for a personal injury, is sufficient ;*
But where the action is for a specific penalty, given to the party grieved, nothing less
than the amount of the penalty is sufficient amends, and available as a defence.* It
is not necessary, however, for the justice to make a regular tender of amends, if
the other party, by his conduct, dispense with it, by a previous refusal to accept.*
If the justice rely upon a tender of amends, before suit brought, it must be specially
pleaded ; in which case only does the statute authorize the court and jury to pass
on it.6
The limitation of six months may be taken advantage of, on the general issue.”
In an action against a justice for maliciously entering judgment against the plaintiff
in a suit in which he had no jurisdiction, the limitation will commence to run from
the time the plaintiff had knowledge of the proceedings.
IV. Novick oF AN INTENDED ACTION FOR TAKING ILLEGAL FEES.9
PuibtapeLpuia, November 13th, 1848.
To J. B., Esquire, one of the aldermen of the county of Philadelphia:
Sir :—Take notice, that unless you tender amends within thirty days, I will bring my
action against you for the following cause, to wit: That on the 19th day of October, a. p.
1848, you did demand and take from me the sum of thirty-seven cents, as and for your
fees, for issuing an execution and entering the return thereof, in a certain action, wherein
judgment was rendered by you for the sum of one dollar and costs, on the 5th day of
ctober 1848, in which one C. 8. was plaintiff, and I, G. N., was defendant; the said sum
of thirty-seven cents being a greater fee than is expressed and limited for the said services
by the act of assembly in such case made and provided, whereby you have forfeited to me
the sum of fifty dollars.
Indorsed.—Notice to J. B., Esquire. W.H. D., Esquire, is my attorney ; his place of
abode is No. 75 Walnut Street, in the city of Philadelphia. G. N,
1 See 38. R. 295, 18] Bao. Abr. 41,
27 WwW. & S. 363. 144 Binn. 25. 3 W. 817. 7 Ibid. 491. 28
8 38 Penn. St. 273. Pitts. L. J. 211.
45 W. 871. 1 3P. & W. 519.
5 Ibid. 370. 16 3 W. 319.
6 9 Penn. St. 135. 79S. & BR. 14,
758. &R. 518. 7 W. 871, 18 1 Phila, 215,
8 6 Binn. 8 19 For other forms of notice, see 4 Binn. 25. 6
9 1 Bro. 65. Ibid. 88. 12 8. & R. 145. 17 Ibid. 75. 3 W.
1035. & R. 295. 144. 7 Ibid. 297, 491. 7 W. & S. 362, 13
ni pate See 75. & R, 448-9, Ponn. St. 9. 2T. & H. Pr. 2 2174,
12 3 W« 319.
[ 607 ]
Hustices of the Peace,
Jurisdiction of, under the United States Laws.
I. Of suits for debts. IV. Proceedings for desertion and seamen’s wages.
II. Of suits for penalties and forfeitures. V. Judicial decisions.
III. Of criminal prosecutions.
Tx mode of’ proceeding to execute the powers of a state magistrate, under the
federal authority, is given with brevity and clearness in the following extract from
2 Bache’s Manual 95-7.
I. Surrs FoR DEBTS.
The United States may sue (in their own name, or in the name of an authorized
ublic officer) in any state court, or before any state magistrate, for the recovery
of debts due to them, in all cases where the acts of congress do not vest an exclu-
sive jurisdiction in the federal courts. Such suits, however, both in their nature
and in their amount, must be within the jurisdiction of the state court or state
magistrate, according to the laws of that state providing for suits instituted by pri-
vate persons. The process for commencing, prosecuting and terminating suits of
the United States, is the same as in suits between individuals.
IJ. Surts FoR PENALTIES AND FORFEITURES.
By the judiciary act, the district court of the United States is vested with exclu-
sive original cognisance of all seizures on land or water, and of all suits for penalties
and forfeitures incurred under the laws of the United States ; but it has been seen,
that subsequent acts of congress have given jurisdiction to state courts and state
magistrates, for the recovery of particular penalties and forfeitures. It is to be
likewise observed, that the state magistrates, having received due information of
offences committed, or goods concealed, in violation of the laws of the United States,
may, lawfully, issue warrants of arrest, and search-warrants, as in similar cases occur-
ring under the state laws. Upon examination of the case, if it be found to be
within the state magistrate’s jurisdiction, he will proceed to decide it; if not, he
will refer the case to the.competent federal judge or tribunal.
The process in cases of penalty is the same as in actions of debt, for money due.
The process in cases of forfeiture of goods is an information im rem. In both
descriptions of cases, the cause of action should be in the express terms of the act
of congress, and the declaration or information should state that the same occurred
“contrary to the form of the act of congress in such case made and provided.”
III. CRIMINAL PROSECUTIONS.
For any crime or offence against the United States, the offender may be arrested,
imprisoned or bailed (as the case may be), by any justice of the peace or other
state magistrate ; but where the punishment may be death, bail can only be admitted
by the supreme court or circuit court of the United States, or by a justice of the
supreme court, or a judge of a district court. If, however, a person committed by
a justice of the supreme, or a judge of a district court, for an offence not punish-
able with death, shall afterwards procure bail, and there be no judge of the United
States in the district to take the same, it may be taken by any judge of the supreme,
or superior court of law of the state.
The usual form of process against offenders in the state is to be issued, and at
the expense of the United States. If the crime or offence charged be not capital, the
state magistrate, when the offender is brought before him, may imprison or bail
him for trial before such court of the United States, or of the state (in the specified
oindie as have cognisance of the offence. Where the punishment of the offence
may be death, the state magistrate cannot admit the offender to bail, but must com
mit him for trial, or until discharged by the due course of law.
608 JUSTICES OF THE PEACH.
In cases bailable by the state magistrate, he must take a recognisance from the
offender and his sureties, in a form similar to that adopted in cases arising under
the state laws. He must also take the recognisances of the witnesses for their
appearance to testify in the case, which may be required on pain of imprisonment,
And it has been judicially decided, that the accused has a right to the same pro-
cess to compel the attendance of the witnesses on his behalf. The state magistrate
must return, as speedily as may be, into the clerk’s office of the court having cog-
nisance of the offence, copies of the process, together with the original recognisance
taken from the party accused and the witnesses.
IV. ProckepiInGs FOR DESERTION AND SEAMEN’S WAGES.
Justices of the peace are also empowered by act of congress, in case any seaman’
who shall have signed a contract to perform a voyage, shall at any port or place,
desert or absent himself from his vessel, without leave of the master, or command-
ing officer, to issue their warrant to apprehend such deserter and bring him before
them; and if the complaint of the master shall be sustained, to commit such sea-
man to jail, there to remain until the vessel be ready to proceed on her voyage, or
the master require his discharge; and then to be delivered to the master, on pay-
ment of the costs, which are to be deducted from the seaman’s wages.
They are also empowered, on the application, in writing, of a consul or vice-
consul of any foreign government having a treaty with the United States for the
restoration of seamen deserting, to issue process for the arrest and examination of
any seaman who may have deserted from a vessel of such government, and if the
complaint be sustained, such deserter, not being a citizen of the United States, is
to be delivered up to such consul or vice-consul, to be sent back to the dominions
of such government ; or, on the request, and at the expense of the said consul or
vice-consul, shall be detained, until the consul or vice-consul finds an opportunity
of sending him back, not exceeding two months. They are also authorized to sum-
mon the master of a vessel to show cause why process should not issue out of the
admiralty court for wages due to the seaman of a vessel; and to grant a certificate
thereof to the clerk of the district court.
Process TO RECOVER SEAMAN’S WAGES.
Eastern District of Pennsylvania,
City of Philadelphia, ss.
To the Marshal of said district, or to any Constable of the said city:
You are hereby commanded forthwith to summon C. D., master of the ship or vessel
zalled the Argus, if he be found within the said city, to be and appear before me, the
subscriber, one of the magistrates of the said city, at my office, N o. 56 South Fourth
street, on the sixth day of May, at ten o’clock in the forenoon (the residence of the judge
of the district being more than three miles from this place), to show cause why process
should not issue against the said vessel, her tackle, furniture and apparel, according tc
the course of admiralty courts, to answer for the wages of A. B., mariner on board the said
vessel. Witness my hand and seal, this first day of May, in the year of our Lord one
thousand eight hundred and eighty. E. F., Magistrate. [szat.]
CERTIFICATE TO THE CLERK OF THE DISTRICT COURT.
a Claim for seaman’s wages.
Q, p, { Summons issued 1st May 1880. Returnable 6th inst., at 10 o’clock.
It appearing that the wages are not paid, satisfied or forfeited, or the matter in dis-
pute settled, I therefore certify, that there is sufficient cause of complaint whereupon to
found admiralty process.
Philadelphia, 6th May, a. m. 1880.
E. F., Magistrate. [sza.]
To F. H., Esq., Clerk of the District Court.
Norz.—For any crime or offence against the United States, the offender may be
arrested, &c., agreeable to the usual mode of process against offenders in the state where
he may be found. The caption, however, of the process must be altered, and “ The
United | States of America” inserted in the place of “ The Commonwealth of Pennsyl-
vania.
LANDLORD AND TENANT. 609
V. If a person be committed by a state magistrate, for an offence against the
United States, he may be admitted to bail by astate judge.! A state magistrate,
acting under the laws of the United States, cannot issue compulsory process into
another state.?
The court will not look beyond the certificate of the justice for the authority of
the clerk to issue process for seaman’s wages; but such certificate must show, on
its face, the officer’s authority to act.®
The power given to arrest and confine deserters by warrant from a magistrate,
“does not supersede the authority given to the master, under the general maritime
law.t ©
An alderman or justice of the peace has no power to imprison, for desertion, a
seaman who was shipped in a foreign port.’ Nor to take cognisance of a charge of
assault and battery alleged to have been committed by an officer of a foreign mer-
chant vessel, upon one of his seamen, while on board the ship.®
Landlord and Tenant.
[See Distress ror Rent. ]
I, Of the relation of landlord and tenant. 7. Of the record.
1, How created. III. Proceedings before a single justice.
2. How dissolved. 1. Under the act of 1863.
3. Of the lease. 2. Practice and proceedings.
4. Of the rent. IV. Proceedings to recover possession for non-
5. Rights and obligations of the parties. payment of rent.
II. Proceedings to recover possession at the ex- V. Proceedings in case of a fraudulent re-
piration of the term. moval of goods.
1. Under the act of 1772. VI. Of the writ of certiorari in landlord and
2. Jurisdiction of justices. tenant cases.
3. Of the notice to quit. VII. Of the rights of the landlord, when the
4, Of the ending of the term. tenant’s goods are seized in execution.
5. Proceedings before the justices and VIII. Rights of a purchaser at a sheriff’s sale of
inquest. the landlord’s interest in the premises.
6. Claim of title.
OF all the jurisdiction confided to the magistrate by the laws of Pennsylvania,
there ig no portion more important, and probably none so little understood, as that
relating to the rights and duties of landlords and tenants.
By many, the existing laws are inveighed against as being oppressive upon the
- tenants and too favorable to the landlord ; while an equal number reprobate them,
as affording no proper security to landlords, and as inviting tenants to a failure of
rent and duty. A slight examination will serve to show that these complaints are
groundless, and that while the rights of the landlord are defended and protected,
-. the proper privileges of the tenant are sacredly regarded. Legislation on this sub-
ject has been frequent, its debates protracted, and the existing system devised after
careful and studied deliberation and examination, and it will be found as impartial
in its protection, and as summary in its redress, as the nature of the case will admit,
and inferior to the system of no other state or country. Indeed, if there be any
defect in our system, it is, that the recent legislation has been too favorable to the
tenant.
I. Of THE RELATION OF LANDLORD AND TENANT.
1. How created.
The relation of landlord and tenant subsists by virtue of an agreement, express
or implied, between two or more persons, for the possession of’ lands or tenements,
In consideration of a certain rent to be paid therefor. The contract itself is called
a lease or demise ; and is a species of conveyance for life. for years, or at the will
1 5 Binn. 512. 6158S. & R. 392.
22 W. 0. C. 159. § United States v. Jenkins, U. S. Dist. Court,
5 Newb. 6. 6 McLean 184. May 1851, Kane, J. MS. :
4 Ware 83. wa”
610 LANDLORD AND TENANT.
of one of the parties, usually containing a reservation of rent to the lessor." Any
agreement, however, whether by writing or parol, under which one party divests
himself of the possession, and the other comes into it, for a determinate time, in
consideration of a certain profit issuing yearly out of the lands and tenements
demised, constitutes a lease, and establishes the relation of landlord and tenant.
Such relation may be created, though no rent be reserved by the lease, the lessor’s
compensation being derived from certain incidental advantages.’ But where the
occupation of a house by a servant is connected with the service, or is required by
the employer for the necessary or better performance thereof, the party occupies as
a servant, and not as a tenant. And a person hired to work land, and receive
as compensation part of the produce, is a cropper, not a tenant.? A contract of
sale cannot be held to create the relation of landlord and tenant.*
An agreement for a lease will be construed to be a present demise, if no future
formal lease be contemplated, and especially if possession be taken under it.". But
a mere agreement for a lease gives the tenant no remedy against a third person who
wrongfully withholds the possession.® Where a lease is actually signed, a delivery
thereof on the part of the lessor, is essential, though he retain possession of the
instrument? :
Leases may be granted, by express terms, for one or more years, or for any part
of a year; in this latter case, however, the lessee will be treated as tenant for years;
a lease for six months, or any time less than a year, is a lease for years.” A parol
lease, ‘‘ by the year,” unaccompanied by more specific words, is a lease for one year,
and is not binding on the parties for more than one year." A lease for no determin-
ate period of time, by which an annual rent is reserved, payable quarterly, is a lease
from year to year, so long as both parties please; it is binding on the parties pros-
pectively for one year only, capable, however, of being extended to a second, third,
fourth or fifth year, and so on, unless determined by the consent of either party,
which may be done at the close of any one year, by giving three months’ previous
notice to that effect, but at no time before the close of a year, after it has commenced."
A letting by parol, for a sum certain per month, without anything being said
about a year, constitutes a lease from month to month, and not a lease from year to
year; and if the tenant hold over for more than a year, he still remains a tenant
from month to month.% Where there is no direct proof as to the terms of a lease
(except that the agreement was for the payment of a certain sum per month), or as
to the period to which it shall extend, no presumption arises of a tenancy from year
to year ;* a lease of doubtful duration is to be construed most favorably for the
tenant."
Where there is no stipulation postponing the commencement of a lease, the day
on which the demise was made is inclusive, and is to be considered in computing
the commencement and termination of the lease. Thus, where a demise is made
on the first of January, to hold from year to year, the rent payable quarterly, the first
quarter’s rent is due on the 31st March, and the landlord may distrain at any time
on the first of April, and so for each quarter; and the year expires with the 31st
of December following.’ ;
Where a tenant remains in possession of the demised premises, after the expira-
tion of his term, without any new agreement, the presumption of law is, that he
holds the premises as a tenant from year to year, subject to all such covenants in
the original lease as are applicable to his present situation.’ And if, in the original
lease, the rent be payable monthly, it continues to be so payable, and may be dis-
trained for at the expiration of any month.’* The landlord, however, at his option,
may treat a lessee holding over after the expiration of his term, as a tenant at will,
1 Taylor, Land. & Ten. 9. 10 5 Binn. 228. A lease at the will of the lessoz
21 Del. Co, R. 101. 6 W. 362. 55 Penn. St. is a demise from year to year. 32 Sm. 310. And
172, 72 Ibid. 285. seo 2 W. N. C. 429.
8 37 Penn. St. 187. 11 2M. 302.
4 60 N. Y. 221, 12-4 R, 132. 43 Leg. Int. 130.
5 53 Penn. St. 81. 8 Ibid, 272. 18 100 Penn. St. 206.
6 43 Ibid. 528. And see 7 Barb. 74. 14 2 Wood. 339. Seel7 W. N.C. 292.
1 3 Story 325. And see 9 Penn. St. 220. 17 1 3 Brewst. 537.
W.N. C. 293. 161 Ash. 197. 24 Penn. St. 272.
8 1 Sweeny 528. See 5S. & R, 421, 11 4 Whart. 226.
9 59 Penn. St. 184.
LANDLORD AND TENANT. G11
whom he may enter upon and dispossess, and in doing so use as much force as is
necessary for that purpose."
If the duration of the lease be left optional, without saying at whose option, it is
construed to mean at the option of the tenant.?| The words “ this lease to be renew-
able at the pleasure of the lessees,” give the latter the option of a renewal for a
like term, and upon similar conditions, as the original demise. An agreement to
pay an increased rent, during the term, is a mere variation of the original contract ;
it effects no change in the time of the commencement or termination of the current
term. Jf made on no new consideration, such agreement is merely void.*
So, a verbal agreement by the lessor, to reduce the rent stipulated for in the
lease, without any time being agreed upon for the continuance of such reduction,
may be revoked at any time. A lease is not void for uncertainty, if the com-
mencement of the term be capable of being reduced to a certainty, by the happen-
ing of a subsequent event ®
A lease signed by the lessor as “agent” creates the relation of landlord and
tenant between the parties.7 And one signed by the lessee as “executrix” is a
personal undertaking, for which the estate is not liable.®
2. How dissolved.
A lease for less than three years, whether in writing or not, may be surrendered
by parol ;® so may a lease for a longer term.’? A surrender of the term, though by
parol, with a yielding up of the possession, puts an end to the relation of landlord
and tenant—the term is extinguished by merger." An abandonment, by the
tenant, of the demised premises, is such a relinquishment as amounts to an implied
surrender, and justifies an immediate resumption of the possession by the landlord.”
But where a tenant left the premises, in the middle of the year, and sent the key
to his landlord, who gave notice that he should continue to hold the tenant liable
for the rent, and then took possession and offered the house to let; it was held,
that he might recover the rent up to the time when the premises were again
rented.’ An agreement between the landlord and the tenant in possession, for the
sale of the premises, amounts to a surrender of an existing lease; so, where a
tenant removes, in pursuance of a notice to quit, for non-payment of rent, the
relation is at an end.”® And asurrender accepted pending a certiorari, stops the
running of rent.
The acceptance of a surrender dissolves the relation of landlord and tenant
between the lessee and a sub-tenant ; but if the latter be ejected by the paramount
landlord, the mesne lessor is liable in damages.'® The acceptance, by the landlord,
of a surrender of the demised premises, does not affect the liability of the lessee
for rent that has previously accrued.” Where a landlord has permitted his tenant
to commit frequent breaches of the covenant for punctual payment of rent, he can-
not enforce a clause of forfeiture, without a previous notice of his intention to
insist on a strict performance.”
8. Of the Lease.
No form of words is necessary to create a lease; it is enough, that there be a
term of years, with an estate beginning and ending, granted by the lessor to the
lessee,
11W.&S.90. 2 Penn. St. 144. 13 6 Whart. 500.
2 3 Brewst. 537. 4758. & R. 372.
8 2 Ibid. 383, 8 Phila. 438. 45 1 Chest. Co. R. 65.
4 6 Phila. 126. 2 W.N. C. 408. 16 10 Phila, 359.
5 103 Penn. St. 409. 17 69 Penn. St. 53.
6 1 Kulp 53. 18 4 Phila. 71.
761 Penn. St. 491. 19 5 W_N. C. 553.
8 6 Phila. 130. 20 11 Ibid. 224,
97 W. 123. 5 Penn. St.422. As towhat is % 72 Penn. St. 285. See 10 Phila. 52. 2 W.
evidence of such surrender, see 25 Ibid. 481. 69 N.C. 297. To render a parol lease for three
Ibid. 326. 96 Ibid. 182. 4 Phila. 57 6 W. years good, under the statute of frauds, the time
N.C. 282. 7 Ibid. 876. 11 Ibid. 213. must be computed from the date of the agreement,
10 92 Penn, St. 444. and not from the commencement of the term. 6
1 5 Ibid. 422. 29 Leg. Int, 230. Phila. 209.
27 W. 123,
612 LANDLORD AND TENANT.
Under a parol demise, the law implies an agreement for quiet enjoyment.t In
fact, every lease contains an implied covenant for quiet enjoyment; and when the
lessor suffers the demised premises to be recovered from bis tenant, in ejectment, by
an outstanding title, his right to recover rent is gone; the covenant to pay rent is
reciprocal to that for quiet enjoyment.’ But this is the only covenant which is
implied on the part of the lessor; there is no implied covenant for good title; or
to keep the premises in repair; or that they are in good condition when leased ;
or that they are fit and suitable for the particular purpose for which the lessor
demises them.’
But if the premises be demised expressly for a dwelling-house and the lessor
represent them to be fit for that purpose, concealing the fact that the drainage is
so defective as to render the same untenantable, and the tenant is compelled to pay
the expense of putting them in repair, such outlay constitutes a valid set-off against
the landlord’s claim for rent.* :
A proviso in the lease from year to year, for a termination of the demise on thirty
days’ notice before the expiration of any year, is not complied with by a general
notice to quit at the expiration of the tenant’s term; such a proviso is not a waiver
of the three months’ notice to quit, required by law.® If a lease stipulate for a
discount on the rent reserved, if paid within five days after it becomes due, no
forteiture can be incurred for non-payment, until the expiration of that time.® A
covenant to pay all taxes and assessments upon the demised premises includes a
municipal assessment for grading and paving.’
An assignee of the lease is liable in equity for a violation of the contract, though
the original lessee covenanted not to assign without the consent of the lessor.2 The
conveyance of an undivided portion of the reversion to a stranger, to whom the
tenant has not attorned, does not take away the lessor’s right to recover possession,
according to the terms of the lease.? A covenant to renew runs with the land, and
an assignee may claim the benefit of it.’
Where the whole term is transferred, it is an assignment, not an under-lease ;
though the rent and power of re-entry for non-payment of rent be reserved to the
assignor, and not to the original lessor." The liability of an assignee of the term is
founded on privity of estate, not on any contract relation.!2 The lessee continues
liable for the rent, notwithstanding an assignment of the lease, and the acceptance
of rent from the assignee, by the lessor; and he continues liable so long as his
assignee holds over.'* But the assignee of the term only continues personally liable,
so long as he remains the owner; he may be relieved, at any time, by assigning to
another.’* A covenant not to under-let is not broken, by an assignment of the
term.@
4. Of the Rent."
Rent is defined to be a certain, profit issuing yearly out of lands and tenements
corporeal. It must be a profit, yet there is no occasion for it to be, as it usually is,
a sum of money; for corn and other matters may be, and frequently are, rendered
by way of rent. It may also consist in services or manual operations, which ser-
vices, in the eye of the law, are profits.* But where, by the terms of the lease, the
lessor is to receive, as rent, a share of the grain raised on the demised premises, he
has no interest in it, until it be severed and delivered to him.
If the lessor enter into part of the premises, the whole rent is suspended, for he
cannot apportion it by any wrongful act of his own.” Thus, where the landlord
claims and uses a right of passage through the premises, without the tenant’s con-
sent, it is incumbent on him to show that such right was reserved, otherwise the
1 20 Penn. St. 482. 15-1 Dall. 305. 2 W. & S. 553. 23 Penn. St.
2 23 Ibid. 452, 18. 42 Ibid. 77. 10 W. N.C. 79.
5 8 Exch. 913. 30 Penn, St. 298. 98 N. Y.245. M4 2 Luz. L. Obs. 331.
£16 W. N.C. 565. 12 Phila. 249. 16 66 Penn. St. 470.
5 6 Phila. 61. 16 2 Luz. L. Reg. 37. And see 6S. & BR. 446.
§ 2 Brewst. 484, \ For the jurisdiction of justices in civil suits
7 1 Pitts. 75. 39 Leg. Int.119. See 3 Pitts. 62. forthe recovery of rent, see tit. “ Actions at Law”
8 6 Phila. 193. 18 2 Bl. Com. 41.
9 51 Penn. St. 499. 1 6 W.& 8.157. 31 Penn. St. 426. 45 Ibid.
0 6 Phila, 558. 3876. See 94 Ibid. 113.
11 2 Ash. 131. But see 13 Phila. 87. 20 1 Y.176. 1 R. 485. 2 Brewst. 524. 2 Phila,
a2 39 Leg. Int. 431. 207
LANDLORD AND TENANT. 613
whole rent will be suspended.’ But the suspension of rent resulting from the entry
‘of a lessor is not of any past rent, but of the accruing rent; therefore, where rent
is payable monthly, the entry of a lessor suspends only the month’s rent, and does
not prevent his recovery of the previous rent;? and the rule is the same, though
the rent be payable in advance. A mere entry, however, of a landlord upon the
premises demised, without an eviction or expulsion of the lessee from some part of
the demised premises, is insufficient to produce a suspension of the rent ;* it is no
more than a trespass. To constitute an eviction there must have been an ante-
cedent possession by the lessee.
In an action by the landlord, upon the leuse, for the recovery of the rent reserved,
it is no defence that the tenant has assigned the term, even with the assent of the
landlord.’ The tenant is bound by his covenant to pay the rent, though he assign
his lease with the landlord’s assent, and though the latter accept the assignee for his
tenant, and receive rent from him.2 A warrant of attorney to confess judgment in
ejectment, on certain terms mentioned in a lease, will not authorize the entry of
judgment in favor of a purchaser of part of the premises. A confession of judg-
ment, in the lease, for rent, refers only to the rent for the particular term mentioned,
and not to holding over.!®
5. Rights and obligations of the parties.
If there be no stipulation on the subject of repairs, the tenant is bound to make
fair and tenantable repairs." And where the lease contains an express and un-
conditional covenant to repair, the tenant must do so, though the premises be
destroyed by fire ; but such covenant only requires that the premises be put in
their former condition.% The untenantable condition of the premises is no defence
to an action for the rent ;* and the fact that the lessor has voluntarily made repairs,
for the benefit of the tenant, does not raise the inference of a contract to doso.” In
the absence of any express covenant, the tenant of premises destroyed by fire, is
entitled to contribution from the landlord, for the expenses of removing a wall left
in a dangerous condition.1¢
The expense of cleaning a privy-well is to be borne by the landlord, not by the
tenant.” And in the absence of any covenant to repair, the landlord is answerable
to a third party for a nuisance which arises from the continuance of. the use of the
property as it was when the tenant took possession.’® A landlord, however, who
employs a mechanic to do repairs on the demised premises, is not liable for damages
resulting from his defective work.”
It is waste for an outgoing tenant to remove the manure made on the premises.”
A tenant is bound to farm the demised premises in a husbandlike manner, according
to the custom of the country where the land is situate ; and if he attempt to divert
the land from the usual course of husbandry, it is waste.” It is not waste to turn
arable land into meadow, or vice versa ; nor is it waste to clear land by a tenant for
life; but whether the cutting of timber, by tenant for life, is waste, must depend
upon the custom of farmers, the situation of the country and the value of the
timber.” Even fixtures erected by the tenant, and when he is entitled to remove,
must be removed during the term; after the expiration of it, he can neither
remove them nor recover their value from the landlord.* If a tenant wrongfully
sever fixtures from the demised premises, they become at once the chattels of the
‘landlord, and he has the right to immediate possession.
14 Dall. 124, 14 86 Penn. St. 327. Even where the landlord has
21 BR. 435. 9 Penn. St. 341. 42 Ibid. 404, covenanted to repair, his omission to do so, is only
3 4N.Y.270. 11 Ibid. 216. a defence to the extent of the damages sustained.
44 R. 339. See 38 Penn. St. 340. 5 W.N.C. 85 Ibid. 534.
492, 11 Ibid. 217. 17 Ibid. 27. 15 71 Penn. St. 429.
5 38‘Penn. St. 340.
6 59 Ibid. 420. See 17 C. B. 50.
_ 7 23 Penn. St. 18.
8 8 Ibid. 120. 42 Ibid. 77. 4 Phila. 342,
9 6 Phila. 518.
10 100 Penn. St. 275.
111W.&S. 530. 23 Penn. St. 305. 68 Ibid.
57. Construction of a covenant to make tenant-
able repairs. 2R.97. See l W.N. C. 49.
12°91 Penn. St. 88.
13 63 Ibid, 162.
16 6 Phila. 547.
17 3 Brewst. 276.
1816 W N.C. 307.
19 6 Phila. 256.
20 17 Penn, St. 262.
5 Ibid. 164.
21] Pars. 304. 4 Clark 330.
22 13 Penn. St. 438, 443.
236 W. 91.
24 3 Pitts. 33. See 107 Penn. St. 106.
107 Penn. St. 85.
1 Pars. 304. 2 Clark 501.
See 1 Pitts. 165.
614 LANDLORD AND TENANT.
A tenant of a farm, under a lease from year to year, for agricultural purposes, is
entitled to the way-going crop! But a tenant who has been evicted for condition
broken, cannot re-enter to gather the crops left in the ground.”
Any act of the lessee by which he disaffrms or impugns the title of the person
indisputably entitled to the rent, is a forfeiture of the lease, and the landlord may
consider him as his tenant, or as a trespasser. But the general rule of law that a
tenant shall not dispute the title of his landlord, is restricted to cases in which the
lease has been fairly obtained, without any misrepresentation, mismanagement or
fraud And although he may not dispute his landlord’s title, he may show that it
has expired, or has been divested.
The tenant is liable for all taxes assessed upon the demised premises. which
became due and payable during his occupancy; and having paid the same, may
defalk the amount from the rent due to his lessor, or may recover the said taxes
from him by action of debt, or otherwise.6 In Philadelphia, after a levy, the
receiver is empowered to collect from the tenant the accruing rent, which is to be
applied in extinguishment of the taxes due upon the demised premises.’
II. PRocEEDINGS TO RECOVER POSSESSION AT THE EXPIRATION OF THE TERM.
The legislature have carefully avoided giving to magistrates any jurisdiction upon
question of title to lands, aud have confined their authority to cases requiring prompt
remedy, leaving the right of trial by jury to the judicial tribunals, in all cases
involving the right of ownership. To have subjected a landlord to the delay of
ordinary trials in a court of law, in the cases provided for before justices of the
peace, would have been to jeopard the collection of rent in arrear, and deprive land-
lords of their right of possession, without any adequate security for redress of such
wrongs. The jurisdiction of magistrates extends only to restore or change possession
of real estate; and the various acts of assembly prescribe the circumstances und the
manner under which this jurisdiction shall be exercised.
The proceedings to recover possession by a landlord at the expiration of the term
for which the premises were demised, are prescribed by the acts of 21st March
1772, and 14th December 1863. Prior to the passage of these acts, the only mode
of obtaining possession was by ejectment ; a process which was found to be dilatory,
and tended to increase the vexations with which a troublesome tenant might choose
to harass his landlord. Inasmuch as it has been determined that the act of 1772
has not been repealed by that of 1863, but that the remedies thereby given are
cumulative,® the text of the former act, and the forms of proceeding under it, have
been retained in this work, although it has become practically almost obsolete.
The act of 1863 is a constitutional exercise of the power vested in the legislature.®
1. Under the Act of 1772.
That act provides that where any person or persons having leased, or demised,
any lands or tenements, to any person or persons, for a term of one or more years,
or at will, paying certain rents, and he, or they, or his or their heirs or assigns,
shall be desirous, upon the determination of the lease, to have again and repossess his
or their estate so demised, and for that purpose shall demand and require his or
their lessée or tenant to remove from and leave the same, if the lessee or tenant
shall refuse to comply therewith, in three months after such request to him made,
it shall and may be lawful to and for such lessor or lessors, his or their heirs
and assigns, to complain thereof to any two justices of the city, town or county,
where the demised premises are situated, and upon due proof made before the said
justices, that the said lessor or lessors had been quietly and peaceably possessed of
the lands or tenements so demanded to be delivered up, that he or they demised the
same under certain rents to the then tenant in possession, or some person or persons,
under whom such tenant claims or came into possession, and that the term for
which the same was demised is fully ended ; that then and in such case, it shall and
1 54 Penn. St. 142. 4 Phila. 72.
2 2 Brewst. 370. 6 Purd 1160.
8 8W.51. See 40 N. Y. 105. T Thid. 1472,
41P.& W. 402. 6 W.44. 35 Penn. St. 108, 8 54 Penn. St, 224,
51 W.& 8.498. 2 Gr. 417. 58 Penn. St. 189. 9 51 Ibid. 412. 6 Phila. 35,
— - LANDLORD AND TENANT. 615
may be lawful for the said two justices to whom complaint shall be made as afore-
said, and they are hereby enjoined and required, forthwith to issue their warrant,
in nature of a summons, directed to the sheriff of the county, thereby commanding
the sheriff to summon twelve substantial freebolders, to appear before the said
justices, within four days next after issuing the said summons, and also to summon
the lessee or tenant, or other person claiming or coming into possession under the
said lessee or tenant, at the same time to appear before them, the said justices and
freeholders, to show cause, if any he has, why restitution of the possession of the
demised premises should not be forthwith made to such lessor or lessors, his or
their heirs or assigns."
And if upon hearing the parties, or in case the tenants, or other persons, claim-
ing or coming into possession under the said lessee or tenant, neglect to appear, after
being summoned as aforesaid, it shall appear to the said justices and freeholders
that the lessor or lessors had been possessed of the lands or tenements in ques-
tion; that he, or they, had demised the same for a term of years, or at will, to the
person in possession, or some other under whom he, or she, claims or came into
possession, at a certain yearly or other rent, and that the term is fully ended ; that
demand had been made of the lessee or other person in possession as aforesaid, to
leave the premises three months before such application to the said justices; that
then, and in every such case, it shall and may be lawful for the said two justices
to make a record of’ such ‘finding by them the said justices and freeholders; and
the said freeholders shall assess such damages as they think right against the tenant
or other person in possession as aforesaid, for the unjust detention of the demised
premises, for which damages and reasonable costs judgment shall be entered by the
said justices, which judgment shall be final and conclusive to the parties; and upon
which the said justices shall, and they are hereby enjoined and required to issue
their warrant, under their hands and seals, directed to the sheriff of the county,
commanding him forthwith to deliver to the lessor or lessors, his or their heirs or
assigns, full possession of the demised premises aforesaid, and to levy the costs
taxed by the justices, and damages so by the freeholders aforesaid assessed, of the
goods and chattels of the lessee or tenant, or other person in possession, as afore-
said, any law, custom or usage to the contrary notwithstanding.”
Provided always, That if the tenant shall allege that the title to the lands and
tenements in question is disputed and claimed by some other person or persons,
whom he shall name, in virtue of a right or title accrued or happening since the
commencement of the lease, so as aforesaid made to him, by descent, deed or from
or under the last will of the lessor, and if, thereupon, the person so claiming shall,
forthwith, or upon a summons, immediately to be issued by the said justices,
returnable in six days next following, before them appear, and on oath or affirma- ,
tion, to be by the said justices administered, declare that he verily believes that he
is entitled to the premises in dispute, and shall, with one or more sufficient sureties,
become bound by recognisance, in the sum of one hundred pounds, to the lessor or
lessors, his or their heirs or assigns, to prosecute his claim at the next court of
common pleas, to be held for the county where the said lands and tenements shall
be, then and in such case, and not otherwise, the said justices shall forbear to give
the said judgment: Provided alsv, That if the said claim shall not be prosecuted
according to the true intent and meaning of the said recognisance, it shall be for-
feited to the use of the lessor or landlord, and the justices aforesaid shall proceed
to give judgment, and cause the lands and tenements aforesaid to be delivered to
him in the manner hereinbefore enjoined and directed.*
It is provided by the act of 1814, that the 12th section of the foregoing act shall
not be so construed or extended, as to enable any landlord or lessor, his heirs or
assigns, by the summary mode of proceeding therein prescribed, to dispossess any
person claiming to hold such leased or demised premises, as joint-tenant, copartner,
or tenant in common with the landlord or person claiming possession: Provided,
That the tenant or the person in possession, or the person under whom the tenant
may claim to hold, shall, upon the return of the warrant, in the nature of a sum-
mons, issued by the two justices of the peace to whom the landlord, lessor or per-
1 Act 21 March 1772 3 12. Purd. 1163. 3 Thid. 2 13.
3 Ibid.
616 LANDLORD AND TENANT.
son claiming possession may have applied, declare on oath or affirmation to be taken
and subscribed before the said justices, that the premises in dispute are holden and
claimed by or under a co-joint tenant, copartner or tenant in common with the
landlord, lessor or person claiming possession, and that the person making such
oath or affirmation doth verily believe, that the premises in dispute do not exceed
in quantity or value the just proportion of the joint-tenant, partner or tenant in
common, by or under whom the premises may be holden or attempted to be holden:
And provided also, That the tenant or person in possession, or the person under
whom the tenant may claim to hold, shall, with one or more sufficient sureties,
become bound by recognisance in the sum of one thousand dollars, to the lessor or
landlord or person claiming possession, his heirs or assigns, to prosecute his claim
at the next court of common pleas, to be held for the county where the land shall
be. But if the said claim shall not be so prosecuted, then and in that case, such
proceedings shall be had as would have been had if the said recognisance had not
been entered into.’
2. Jurisdiction of justices.
To confer jurisdiction under the act of 1772, there must have been a letting or
lease, or permission to occupy, under which the party in possession became tenant
of the party claiming as landlord. This tenancy, or permission, may have been
either by written or verbal lease or agreement, provided, in the latter case, that
such lease does not extend beyond three years, in which event the law requires it
to be in writing? The relation of landlord and tenant must be shown to have
existed between the parties by agreement, and not a tenancy created by mere opera-
tion of law.’ A tenant for less than a year is within the act;* and a grantee for
life’ The object of the statute is to furnish a summary proceeding in which the
rights of the parties shall be protected, and the delays incident to an ejectment
avoided §
It is also requisite that there should have been, at the inception of the tenancy,
a rent reserved, payable yearly or otherwise, according to the terms of the agree-
ment; or in the absence of any agreement as tg the time of its payment, according
to established usage ; but though the times of payment may be inferred, and need no
specific agreement, yet it is well settled, that there must be a rent agreed upon, to
be paid, reserved by the lessor and promised by the lessee; for the act of assembly,
before recited, limits the operation of this remedy to cases in which there has been
a demise to a person or persons “ paying certain rents.’ And where no certain rent
has been reserved, the landlord cannot claim the benefit of this act of assembly, but
is left to his action of ejectment (the remedy by which possession was universally
sought before the passage of this act), a mode which is tardy and inconvenient in
its operation, and expensive in its execution.
‘The smallest amount of money, goods or services, however, at stated times, or
when required, has been decided to be a “ certain rent;” as, ‘‘ payment of the taxes,
and chinking and daubing the house.”’* But the rent of “ taking care of the grain
of the landlord, on the place, and keeping out the cattle,” is not sufficiently certain.’
Nor is a demise at will, in consideration of services to be rendered annually to a
religious society, as fore-singer and organist.? Unless a certain rent be reserved,
the justices have no jurisdiction ;”° such proceedings will lie, only in a plain and
ordinary case of a demise at a certain rent, and a tenancy whose termination is
independent of a contingency."
The grantee for life of the landlord’s estate may sustain proceedings to recover
possession as assignee of the reversion ;” but a residuary devisee cannot proceed
against the tenant of the devisee for life; the grantee, however, of a portion of
the demised premises may recover his part thereof.
1 Act 22 March 1814 31. Purd. 1165, 7 5 Binn. 228.
2 Purd. 941, 83P.& W. 55.
3 28 N. Y. 55. 9 2 Penn. St. 292. Seel W. & S. 496. 5 N.Y
45 Binn. 228. And seo 4 R.123. 1 Whart. 388.
815. 4 Ibid. 226. 5 Ibid. 278. 3 W. 129 5 1028.&R. 480. 89 Penn. St, 460.
Ibid. 275. 6 Ibid. 362. 1W.& S.90. 2 Ash. U3 P. & W. 34.
131. 2 M. 305. 12 24 Penn. St. 96.
5 24 Penn. St. 96. 18 8 Phiia, 244,
6 81 Ibid. 217. 14 81 Penn. St. 217.
LANDLORD AND TENANT. 617
3. Of the Notice to quit.
As proceedings under the act of 1772 cannot be commenced until the relation of
landlord and tenant is dissolved,’ the first step to be taken, in order to regain posses-
sion of the demised premises, is the giving to the tenant a three months’ notice to
quit; where, however, the renting is from month to month, and the tenant holds
over, he does not thereby become a tenant from year to year, and in such case, it
seems, a month’s notice to quit is sufficient.
Where the lease is for years, or for a time certain, the notice to quit may be
given at any time before the expiration of the term, and the proceedings under thia
act may be taken three months after such notice, the term having expired, if the
tenant has not complied with the request contained in the notice.? Where, how-
ever, the tenancy is at will, which has been decided to be from year to year, the
notice to quit must be given at least three months before the expiration of the year,
in order to entitle the landlord to the benefit of this remedy.+
The reason for the difference is said to be, that in case of a lease for a certain
time, the expiration of it is well known to both parties, and there is an implied
agreement to surrender upon the termination of the lease, and therefore it does not
require notice three months previously to the ending of the term. It is, however,
not so where the tenancy is at will, determinable at pleasure; and therefore the
law seems to require that the notice should be given at least three months before
the expiration of the year, so that the tenant may have a timely admonition of the
landlord’s intention to have his premises upon the termination of the existing or
current year.
But a tenant from quarter to quarter, who has held over, is not bound to give
notice to quit at the end of the current quarter.* And though a lease for one year
provide that if the lessee continue on the premises, after the termination of the
contract, then the same is to continue in force for another year, and so on from
year to year, ualess either party shall give legal notice in writing to the other party
of his intention to terminate said letting, yet the tenant may quit at the end of any
current year, without any previous notice to the lessor of his intention to do so.
In such case, the three months’ legal notice is required from the landlord only.é
On a lease for three years, containing a proviso that, if the tenant should con-
tinue in possession, then the lease should be in force for another year, and so on
from year to year, the notice to quit need not be given until the end of the term
of three years.’
A parol notice to quit is sufficient. No notice is necessary to be given to the
under-tenants.? Notice to one of two joint tenants in possession is suffcient.° In
a written notice, a misdescription of the premises, which cannot mislead the tenant,
is immaterial." In all cases, leaving the notice at the dwelling-house of the tenant is
sufficient; it may be given to the assignee of the tenant, who is in possession of
the premises.® It is not necessary to specify in the notice the time of the expira-
tion of the current term ; the tenant is bound to take notice of the ending of his
term ; it is a matter as much within his knowledge as in that of the landlord.™
The notice to quit may be waived.® A clause in a lease agreeing to surrender
possession, ‘‘ without further notice,” will dispense with the three months’ notice
required to sustain proceedings under the act of 1772; but if such agreement of
waiver be not found by the inquest, its finding will be quashed on certiorari.® The
payment to a clerk of rent which accrued subsequently to the expiration of a notice
to quit, the clerk having no special authority to waive the notice, does not amount to
a waiver thereof.” ’
The notice to quit must be positive: if it be in the alternative, to quit or pay an
188. &R.470. SW. &S. 231. 8 89 Penn. St. 131. 1 Brewst. 304. 2 Ibid. 528
2 100 Penn. St. 206, 209. 2 Chest. Co. R. 178. 9 5 Bos. & Pul. 330.
Taylor, Land. &-Ten. 3 57. 10 5 Hsp. 196.
38S. & BR. 459. 4°R.126. 6 Phila. 243. 9 tl 4 Ibid. 185.
Penn. St. 273. 247. R. 465.
41Binn. 254. 2 Ash. 131. 2 Pears. 81. 13 2 Ash, 13).
5 10 Penn. St. 41. See 4 Phila. 33. 89 Penn. 14 54 Penn. St. 94.
St. 132-3. 96 Ibid. 182. 15 89 Penn. St. 131.
614 W.N. C. 497. 16 11 Ibid. 472. See6 Phila. 61. 43 Leg. Int. 37.
1 6 Phila. 243. 57 Penn. St. 184. 17 2 Brewst. 365.
618 LANDLORD AND TENANT.
increased rent, it is insufficient to support proceedings under the statute.’ It seems,
however, that if the tenant receive such a notice, without objection, and hold over,
it will operate as a contract to pay the increased rent.’ So, if the tenant personally
receive notice to quit at a particular day, without objection, it is an admission that -
his tenancy expires on that day? A notice to quit given by the assignee of the
lessor is not good, unless it appear that the tenant was informed of the right of
the assignee. But one who purchased from the landlord, after the giving of the
notice, may recover possession under the statute.
ForM OF NOTICE TO QUIT.
To C. D. Philadelphia, November 30th, 1869.
Sir,—You are hereby notified and required to quit, remove from and deliver up to me,
possession of the premises situated on the [north] side of [Chestnut] street [No. 373],
between [Third] and [Fourth] streets, in the [city] of [Philadelphia] (which you now
hold as tenant ander me), at the end of your current term, as I desire to have again
and repossess the same. :
Yours respectfully, (Signed) A. B.
The person who serves a copy of this notice should compare it carefully, and note,
on the back of the notice, the day on which it was served, so that, if required, he
may be ready to prove these facts.
4. Of the ending of the term.
It frequently happens, where the tenant has been for a long time in possession,
under a letting from year to year, and especially where the original lessor has
aliened the reversion of the demised premises, that the landlord, from loss of evi-
dence of the commencement and termination of the lease, is unable to give the
requisite notice to quit. To remedy this inconvenience, so far as the city of Phila-
delphia is concerned, the act of 28th February 1865 was passed.
That act provides, that in all cases, in the city of Philadelphia, where there is a
lease or verbal letting of property for a term of years, or from year to year, and the
landlord, whether the owner at the time of such lease or letting, or by purchase
subsequent thereto, has lost the lease or evidence of the beginning and conclusion
of the term, or cannot produce proof of the same, it shall be lawful, at any time
after the first year, or after the term of years, as the case may be, for the landlord
desiring to recover possession of the demised property, to give notice in writing
to the tenant that he has lost such lease or is unable to make such proof, and requiring
the tenant, within thirty days from the time of serving of such notice, to furnish
him in writing with the date at which his term of tenancy commenced, and such
notice, if supported by affidavit, shall be evidence of what it sets forth; if the
tenant shall furnish in writing the date as required, such writing shall be evidence
of the facts contained in it; but if the tenant shall fail or refuse, within thirty
days, to comply with the said requirements, the landlord may, at the expiration of
that period, give to the tenant three months’ notice to quit the premises occupied
by him, and shall proceed thereafter in the same manner as is now provided in
cases of the usual notice to quit at the end of the term: Provided, That if the
tenant shall make affidavit, within the thirty days aforesaid, that he is unable to
comply with the requirement of the landlord, stating the causes of such inability,
the landlord shall give six months’ notice to the tenant to remove from the demised
premises, upon which he shall proceed as provided in the cases of the three months’
notice as aforesaid.®
This act extends to the assignee of the original lessor.’ But it only applies to a
tenancy created by lease, which fixes a term and rent; it is very much out of the
course of the common law, and ought to be strictly construed. The record must
show a tenancy for years, or from year to year, and that the first year of the term,
- or the term itself, is ended, else the magistrate has no jurisdiction under it.§ But
the law does not require the notice to the tenant to be supported by affidavit.
2 2 Brewst. 357. 13 W.N.C. 357. And see 1 Doug. 5 54 Penn. St. 224,
167. 30. & P. 432, 2Q. B. 143. 11 Mo. 548. 6 Purd. 1167.
2 14 Leg. Int. 121. 15 N.Y. 374, 7 24 Leg. Int. 92.
§ 1 Greenl. Evid. 2197. 2 Ibid. 2 323. 5 64 Penn. St. 230.
¢« 2 Brewst. 486, 528. 9 Ibid. 232. 24 Leg. Int. 92.
LANDLORD AND TENANT, 619
Novick To 4 TENANT, UNDER THE act or 1865,
Philadelphia, 1st January 1880.
Havine lost the [lease or] evidence of the beginning and conclusion of your term in the
following-described premises demised to you by [me], for the term of one year [or, from
year to year], which term is fully ended, to wit, all that dwelling-house and lot of ground,
No. 1080 North Tenth street, in the city of Philadelphia, and’ being desirous to recover
possession of the said described premises, you are hereby notified that I am unable to
make proof of the beginning and conclusion of your said term, and therefore require
you, within thirty days from the time of the service of this notice, to furnish ine, in
writing, with the date at which your said term of tenancy commenced, according to the
terms and provisions of the act of assembly in such case made and provided.
Yours, &e., (Signed) A. B.
To C.D.
On the receipt of this notice, the tenant should, within thirty days, make return
in writing, under oath or affirmation, either of the date of the commencement of his
term, or of his inability to do so.
AFFIDAVIT OF COMMENCEMENT OF TERM.
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ss.
Personally appeared before me, the subscriber, one of the magistrates of the said city,
C. D., who, being duly sworn according to law, doth depose and say, that his tenancy of
the premises, No. 1080 North Tenth street, in the city of Philadelphhia, under A. B.,
commenced on the fifth day of November 1863. C.D.
Sworn and subscribed before me, this 15th day of January 1880.
J.B, Magistrate. [szau.]
AFFIDAVIT OF INABILITY TO COMPLY.
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ss.
Personally appeared before me, the subscriber, one of the magistrates of the said city, .
0. D., who, being duly sworn according to law, doth depose and say, that he is unable
to comply with the requirement of his landlord, A. B., by giving the date at which his
tenancy of the premises, No. 1080 North Tenth street, commenced, because he became
tenant thereof as assignee of G. H., the original lessee, who did not inform him when the
said tenancy commenced.
Sworn and subscribed before me, this 15th day of January 1880.
J. B., Magistrate. [szau.]
Notice To QUIT ON FAILURE OF TENANT TO COMPLY.
; Philadelphia, Ist February 1880.
On the first day of January 1880, I gave you notice that the [lease or] evidence of the
‘beginning and conclusion of the term [of one year], for which the premises now occu-
ied by you, situate No. 1080 North Tenth street, in the city of Philadelphia, was lost,
he. and that you should, within thirty days thereafter, furnish me, in writing, with the
date at which your term of tenancy commenced; you having failed to comply with
the requirements of said notice, and your original term being fully ended, I hereby
require you to remove from said premises, and deliver up possession of the same to me,
within three months from the time you shall receive this notice.
Yours, &c., (Signed) A. B.
To Mr. C. D. i
Norick to QUIT, WHERE TENANT IS UNABLE TO COMPLY.
Philadelphia, 1st February 1880.
On the first day of January 1880, I gave you notice requiring you to furnish me in
writing, within thirty days from the time of the service of the said notice, with the date,
at which your term of tenancy commenced, of the premises now occupied by you [under
a demise for one year], situate No. 1080 North Tenth street, in the city of Philadelphia,
and you having made affidavit, within the said thirty days, that you are unable to com-
ply with the requirements therein, and your original term being fully ended, you are
hereby required to remove from, and surrender to me possession of said premises, within
six months from the time you shall receive this notice. ;
Yours, &c., (Signed) A, B.
To Mr. C. D.
620 LANDLORD AND TENANT.
5. Proceedings before the justices and inquest.
If, at the expiration of three months after notice, the tenancy having expired, the
tenant still remains in possession, either by himself or his sub-tenants, then recourse
is had to this act of assembly as the means of obtaining possession. ;
When the landlord wishes to proceed under the act of 1772 (which cannot be
done until the relation of landlord and tenant is dissolved) ;1 proof is made before
two magistrates of the city, borough or county, wheresoever the demised premises
are sltuate— ~
That the lessor had been possessed of the premises, and had demised the same to
the tenant in possession, or to some person or persons under whom the tenant claims,
or under whom he obtained possession ;
That a certain rent had been reserved ;
That the term for which the premises were demised had fully ended;
That notice to quit had been given three months previously ;
And that the tenant had neglected or refused to comply with the notice.
Upon proof being made of these facts, it is the duty of the two magistrates to
issue a venire to the sheriff, commanding him to summon a jury, pursuant to the
requisitions of the act, to appear at a place, and on a day certain.’
The affidavit of the landlord is sufficient to found the proceedings.’
Form oF A COMPLAINT UNDER THE acT oF 1772,
To G. H., one of the Magistrates of the city of Philadelphia.
THE complaint of [A. B.] respectfully sets forth, that he is the owner of a certain
[house] with the appurtenances, situate [on the north side of Chestnut street, No. 373,
between Third and Fourth streets, in the city of Philadelphia], and was in peaceable
possession thereof [on the tenth day of June, a. p. 1882], when he demised the said pre-
mises to a certain [C. D.] for the full term of [two years], at the ey rent of [five
hundred dollars], which said term is fully ended.* That he the said [A. B.] being
desirous, upon the determination of the said term, to have again and repossess [his] said
estate, for that purpose, did on the [thirtieth] day of [November] last past, demand and
require the said |C. D.] to remove from and leave the same, and that the said [C. D.]
hath hitherto refused and still doth refuse to comply therewith; that three months
having elapsed since the service of the said notice, [he] makes this [his] complaint, that
such proceedings may be taken by you, as are directed by the act of assembly in such
case made and provided. (Signed) A. B.
Sworn and subscribed before us, this [tenth day of June 1884].
G. H., Magistrate.
Norz.—In the case of an assignee, after the * add the words: And the said A. B.,
after making the demise aforesaid, to wit, on the [first] day of [July] a. p. 1882, by his
certain deed of conveyance, duly made and executed, bearing date the same day and year,
for the consideration therein mentioned, did grant, bargain and sell the premises afore-
said, with the appurtenances, unto the said J. K., his heirs and assigns, and the said
J.K. being desirous to have again and repossess the said premises, so as aforesaid
demised by the said A. B. to the said C. D., for that purpose did, &c.
The summons and venire may be made returnable before the fourth day ;* it
must be served in the mode prescribed by the act of 1536. If, however, there be
more than four days between the issuing and return of the precept, it is cured by
the tenant’s appearance ;® the latter must, however, be allowed a reasonable time
to procure testimony.?| Service upon a person in possession, claiming to be agent
of the lessee, is sufficient.? The statute requires that the inquest be composed of
freeholders, that is, owners of land in fee simple, fee tail, or for life.® They must
be selected by the sheriff himself..° If they cannot agree, they may be discharged
and another venire issued; and in such case, each party must pay his own
costs.”
18S. &R.470. 8W.&S, 431. 8 64 Penn. St. 336.
2The jurisdiction may be exercised by one 91 Wood. 79.
magistrate in Philadelphia: see title ‘ Magis- 108 Penn. St. 412. 8 Phila, 342. But an ap-
trates’ Courts.” pearance and going to trial is a waiver of any
34 W. & S. 120. irregularity in the selection and summoning of
4158, & R. 43. ; the jurors. 77 Penn. St. 291.
5 2 Leg. Gaz. 12. 4 W. & 8.120. 24 Penn. St. 96.
64 Y.523, 28. & R. 481-2. 122 Chest. Co. R. 496.
T4Y.49. 8 Phila. 342.
LANDLORD AND TENANT, 621
Form OF VENIRE UNDER THE Act oF 1772.
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ss.
. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To the Sheriff of Philadelphia county, greeting:
Wuersas, complaint and due proof were this day made before [G. H.], Esq., ona of
our [magistrates of the city of Philadelphia], that [A. B.] on the feath day of [June]
1882, was quietly and peaceably possessed of a [certain house with the appurtenances,
situate on the north side of Chestnut street, No. 373, between Third and Fourth streets,
in the city. of Philadelphia], and being so thereof possessed, on the same day and year
aforesaid, did demise the said premises to one [C. D.] for the term of [two years] then
next ensuing, at the [annual] rent of [five hundred dollars], and that the said [C. D.] by
virtue of the said demise entered into possession of the said demised premises, and held
the same during the said term, and is still possessed of the same, and that the said term
for which the said premises were demised is fully ended; and the said [A. B.], being
desirous, upon the said determination of the said term, to have again and repossess tie
said premises, for that purpose did, on the [thirteenth] day of [November 1883], demand
of and require the said e D.] to remove from and leave the same, and that the said
[C. D.] hath hitherto refused and still doth refuse to comply with the said demand and
requisition to remove from and leave the said premises. Therefore, we command you, that
you summon twelve substantial freeholders of your bailiwick, so that they be and appear
before our said [magistrate] at [the Wetherill House, in Sansom street], on [Tuesday], the
[fourteenth] day of [June] 1884, at [four] o’clock in the [afternoon] of that day, and
that you also summon the said [C. D.], so that he be and appear before our said [magis-
fate, and the said freeholders, at the day and place last aforesaid, to show cause, if any
he has, why restitution of the possession of the said demised premises should not be forth-
with made to the said [A. B.], according to the form and effect of the act uf the general
assembly in such case made and provided. And this you shall nowise omit. And have
you then and there this writ. Witness the said [G. H.], Esquire, at the [city of Phila-
delphia] aforesaid, the [tenth] day of [June] 1884.
G. H., Magistrate. [szat.]
Return of the sheriff.—To the magistrate within named, I do respectfully certify that
I have summoned twelve substantial freeholders, and have also summoned the within-
named C. D. to be and appear at the day and place mentioned, as by the within precept
Iam commanded. D. F., Sheriff.
OatH OF A JUROR UNDER THE act oF 1772.
You do swear [or affirm] that you will well and truly inquire of and concerning the
premises in this [the foregoing] precept mentioned, and assess such damages, if any, as
the complainant hath sustained thereby. So help you God!
“If due proof of the truth of the complaint be submitted to the magistrate and
jury composed of twelve freeholders, which, thus assembled, constitute what is
commonly termed “ A Landlord’s and Tenant’s Court,” and they shall find the
complaint to have been well founded, a record of their finding of these facts is
made by the magistrate, who, together with the jury, assess damages for the unjust
detention of the property.
Where the freeholders are not named in the return, it will be presumed that
those who signed the inquisition were the ones summoned.’ It is not necessary
that the inquest should find that the complainant is entitled to restitution ; that is
a matter for the magistrate, to be entered on the record.? It is enough, that the
description in the inquisition follow that in the lease. The landlord is not con-
cluded by the finding, though the tenant is; the former may renew his complaint
before another magistrate ;* and the tenant may traverse the finding, in an eject-
ment brought to try the title.
1-75 Penn. St. 363. 4 8 Penn. St. 414.
2 4 Ibid. 140. 548. &R. 207.
8 64 Ibid. 224,
622 LANDLORD AND TENANT.
ForM OF INQUISITION UNDER THE acT oF 1772.
Inquisrrion taken at [the Wetherill House, in Sansom street, in the city of Philadel.
hia], on the [fourteenth] day of [June], in the year one thousand eight hundred and
leighty-four|, before [G. H.], Esq., one of our [magistrates of the city of Philadelphia],
by the oaths of (K. L., M. N.,é&c.], and the solemn affirmations of [E. R., Z. Y.], twelve
substantial freeholders of the said [city], who upon their oaths and affirmations respect-
ively do say, that [A. B.| on the [tenth] day of [June], in the year eighteen hundred
and [eighty-two], was quietly and peaceably possessed of a [certain house, with the
appurtenances, situate on the north side of Chestnut street, No. 373, between Third and
Fourth streets, in the city of Philadelphia], and being so thereof possessed. ou’ the same
day and year last aforesaid, did demise the said premises to one [C. D.], for the term of
two years] then next ensuing, at the [annual] rent of [five hundred dollars], and that
the said (C. D.], by virtue of the said demise entered into possession of the said demised
premises, and held the same during the said term, and is still possessed of the same, and
that the said term for which the said premises were demised is fully ended ; and the said
(A. B.] being desirous, upon the said determination of the said term, to have again and
repossess the said premises, for that purpose did, on the [thirtieth] day of [November
1883], demand of and require the said [C. D.] to remove from and leave the same, and
that the said [C. D.] hath hitherto refused, and still doth refuse, to comply with the said
demand and requisition to remove from and leave the said premises. And the said free-
holders do assess damages against the said [C. D.] for the unjust detention of the said
demised premises at [one hundred and forty dollars], besides all costs of suit. Where-
upon, it is considered by the said [magistrate] that restitution of the said demised pre-
mises be made to the said [A. B.], and that he recover of the said [C. D.] his damages
aforesaid, together with the costs of suit, amounting to [forty dollars]. In testimony
whereof, as well the said magistrate as the said freeholders have hereunto set their hands
and seals, the day and year first above written, at the city of Philadelphia aforesaid.
G. H., Magistrate. [sEat.]
A,, B., C., D., E., F.
and [SEALs.]
G., H.,1L, J., K. and L.
The finding of the jury, both upon the point of possession and amount of dam-
ages, being thus entered of record by the magistrate, is final and conclusive, and
the magistrate issues a writ of possession directed to the sheriff, commanding resti-
tution of the premises to the landlord, and also that the sheriff levy the amount
awarded of damages and costs. The practice is for the magistrate to give judgment
for a gross sum for costs, and the court, on certiorari, will presume they were duly
taxed.*
There is no appeal from the judgment of the magistrate.? But although the act
of assembly declares that the judgment shall be final and conclusive to the parties,
yet the proceedings may be examined by certiorari from the common pleas or the
supreme court;® and a writ of error lies to the judgment of the common pleas.*
But a certiorari is no supersedeas (except in Philadelphia) ;° it does not bring up
the evidence ; the regularity of the proceedings can alone be examined.® And on
a reversal, restitution is ex gratia, and may be refused ;7 it will not be granted on a
bald legal right against equity and justice.®
ForM OF WARRANT TO DELIVER POSSESSION, UNDER THE AcT oF 1772.
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ss.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To the Sheriff of Philadelphia county, greeting :
Wuerzas, due proof hath been made before [G. H.], one of the [magistrates of the
city of Philadelphia], and twelve substantial freeholders, summoned for that purpose,
that [A. B. did, on the tenth day of June, a. v. 1882, demise to C. D. a certain
house situate on the north side of Chestnut street, No. 373, between Third and Fourth
streets, in the city of Philadelphia, for the term of two years, at the annual rent
of five hundred dollars], and that the said [C. D.], by virtue of the said demise, entered
: 5 W. 17. 56 Binn. 460. See act 24 March 1865, Purd.
57 Penn. St. 446. 1169, as to the effect of a certiorari, in Philadel-
- 3 Penny. 25. phia.
Add. 192. 1 Binn. 333-4, 4 Ibid. 185. 6 64 Penn.St.140. 19Ibid. 137. 61 Ibid. 491.
Ibid. 128, 460. 38.&R.195. 1R.317. The 71 Ibid. 126, And see2 Dall. 205, 1 Y. 160,
landlord is not concluded by the finding, though 207. ,
the tenant is. 8 Penn. St. 414, 86 Phila. 129.
LANDLORD AND TENANT. 623
into possession of the said premises, and held them during the said term, and is still pos-
sessed thereof; and that the said term is fully ended, and that the said [A. B.] being
desirous, upon the determination of the said term, to have again and repossess the said
premises, for that purpose did, on the [thirtieth] day of [November] 1883, demand of and
require the said [C. D.] to remove from and leave the same, and that the said [C. D.] had
hitherto refused and still doth refuse to comply therewith; all which premises being duly
found by the said [magistrates] and frecholders, according to the form of the act of general
assembly in such case made and provided: We, therefore, command you, the said sheriff,
forthwith to deliver to the said [A. B.] full possession of the demised premises aforesaid.
And we also command you, that of the goods and chattels of the said [C. D.],in your
bailiwick, you cause to be levied as well the sum of [one hundred and forty dollars],
which to the said [A. B.] was awarded for [his] damages sustained by the unjust deten-
tion of the premises, as [forty dollars] for ae costs and charges, by [him] in and about
[his] suit in that behalf expended, whereof the said [C. D.] is convict. And hereof fail
not. Witness the said (G. H.] at Philadelphia, in the county aforesaid, the [fourteenth]
day of [June], a. p. one thousand eight hundred and eighty-four.
G. H., Magistrate. [sEaL. |
6. Claim of Title.
It seems, that the tenant himself may claim title under this section! He can-
not dispute his landlord’s title; but he may show that it has expired ;? or that the
complainant, claiming to be the assignee of the lease, has no title, and that he was
induced to attorn to him by fraud. He must, however, if he have himself acquired
the title, show either a conveyance, or such an equitable right to one as would
sustain a decree for specific performance.*
The intention of the act is to confine the inquiry to the matters set fortn in the
12th section ; if any more complicated case presents itself, the magistrate should
arrest the proceedings ;> but a dispute as to when the term expires, is one for the
jury of freeholders.© The tenant himself cannot set up the outstanding title of a
stranger, who does not appear and claim.”
When the case comes into court, the burden of proving title is on the tenant?
This section has no application to proceedings under the act of 1863; under that
act, the tenant’s remedy is by appeal.® If the condition of the recognisance be not
punctually and in all things complied with, the recognisance will be forfeited to the
use of the lessor, and the proceedings gone on with before the magistrate and jury,
as at first proposed.
' SUMMONS TO A THIRD PARTY CLAIMING TITLE.
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ss.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To the Sheriff of Philadelphia county, greeting:
Wuereas, complaint and due proof hath been made before |G. H.], one of our
magistrates of the city of Philadelphia, that [A. B.], on the [tenth] day of [June],
in the year one thousand eight hundred and |eighty-two]J, was quietly and peaceably pos-
sessed of a certain house with the appurtenances, situate (on the north side of Chestnut
street, No. 373, between Third and Fourth streets, in the city of Philadelphia]; and
being so thereof possessed, on the same day and year aforesaid, did demise the said pre-
mises to one [C. D.], for the term of two years then next ensuing, at the yearly rent of
five hundred dollars, lawful money, payable for the same; and that the said [C. D.], by
virtue of the said demise, entered into possession of the said demised premises, with the
appurtenances, and held the same during the said term, and is still possessed thereof ;
and that the said term for which the said premises were demised is fully ended ; and that
the said [A. B.], being desirous, upon the determination of the said lease, to have again
and repossess his said estate, so demised, for that purpose, did, on the [thirtieth] day of
November 1883], require the said [C. D.] to remove from and leave the same, and
that the said [C. D.] hath hitherto refused, and still doth refuse, to comply therewith.
13P.&W. 37. 4W.&S. 126. 53 P.& W. 34. 1W.& 8.499. 8 Ibid. 226.
258. & R.355. 5 W. 385. 1 W.& S, 498. 6 81 Penn. St. 217.
106 Penn. St. 412, 15 N. Y. 377. 74 W.&8.120. 58 Penn. St. 139.
3 3 Phila. 360. 8 57 Penn. St. 446.
9 62 Ibid. 177.
42Gr.417. And see 62 Penn. St.177. 8 Phila.
842. 3 Brewst. 253.
624 LANDLORD AND TENANT.
And whereas, the said [C. D.], being duly summoned, doth appear before our said magis-
trate, and doth allege that the title to the said premises is disputed and claimed by [0. P.,
of ——,, in the city of Philadelphia], in virtue of a right or title acerued or happening
since the commencement of the lease so as aforesaid made to him the said [C.D.], by virtue
of a deed made by the said A. B. to the said O. P. You ARE THEREFORE COMMANDED te
summon the said [O. P.] to appear before our said magistrate, at the house of fe acob I,
Moyer, No. 393 Chestnut street, in the city aforesaid], on the [twenty-fourth] day of
[June 1884, at eleven o’clock in the forenoon], to declare, on oath or affirmation, to be
by our said magistrate administered, that he verily believes that he is entitled to the pre-
mises in dispute ; and with one or more sufficient sureties, to become bound by recogni-
sances, in the sum of one hundred pounds, to the said [A. B.], his heirs and assigns, to
prosecute his claim at the next court of common pleas, to be held for the said county (if
to him it shall be expedient). Make return hereof according to law. _
Witness the said [G. H.], at the city of Philadelphia aforesaid, the [eighteenth] day of
[June], in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and [eighty-four].
G. H. [sEAL.]
7. Of the Record.
All the facts necessary to confer jurisdiction must be set out in the record!
nothing which ought to appear can be taken by intendment.? It is essential that
it appear by the record, that the term was fully ended ;° but the record need not set
forth under what statute the party proceeded.* The following form of record has
received the approval of the supreme court.®
ForM OF RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS UNDER THE ACT oF 1772.
BE IT REMEMBERED, that on the [fourteenth] day of [June], in the year one thousand
eight hundred and [eighty-four], at [Philadelphia city], due proof was made before
[G. H.], Esq., one of our [magistrates], thaf [A. B.], on the [tenth] day of june]; in the
year eighteen hundred and [eighty-two], was quietly and peaceably possessed of a [cer-
tain house with the appurtenances, situate on the north side of Chestnut street, No. 373,
between Third and Fourth streets, in the city of Philadelphia], and being so thereof pos-
sessed, on the same day and year last aforesaid, did demise the said premises to one
[C. D.], for the term of [two] years, then next ensuing, at the [annual] rent of [five hun-
dred dollars], and that the said [C. D.], by virtue of the said demise, entered into posses-
sion of the said demised premises, and held the same during the said term, and is still
possessed of the same, and that the said term for which the said premises were demised
is fully ended; and the said [A. B.] being desirous, upon the said termination of the
suid term, to have again and repossess the said premises, for that purpose did, on
the [thirtieth] day of [November 1883], demand of and require the said [C. D.] to remove
from and leave the same, and that the said [C. D.] hath hitherto refused and still doth
refuse to comply with the said demand and requisition to remove from and leave the said
premises. Whereupon the said [A. B.] then, to wit, on thesaid [fourteenth] day of [June],
eighteen hundred and [eighty-four], at the [city] aforesaid, prayed the said [magistrate]
that a due remedy in that behalf be provided for him, according to the form of the act
of the general assembly of the state of Pennsylvania in such cuse made and provided,
upon which proof and complaint the sheriff of the county of [Philadel phia| is com-
manded that he summon twelve substantial freeholders of his bailiwick, so that they be
and appear before the said [magistrate], at the [house of Jacob I. Moyer, No. 393 Chest-
nut street], on [Tuesday], the [eighteccth| day of [June ry at [four] o’clock in the
[afternoon| of that day, and that he also summon the said {C. D.], so that he be and
appear before the said [magistrate], and the said freeholders, at the day and place last
aforesaid, to show cause, if any he has, why restitution of the possession of the said
demised premises should not be forthwith made to the aforesaid [A. B.]. Afterwards, to
wit, on the said [eighteenth] day of [June 1884], at the house aforesaid [D. F.], sheriff
of the county of [Philadelphia], appears before the said [magistrate], and returns, that
by virtue of the said warrant to him directed, he had summoned twelve substantial free-
holders, to wit, [G. I1., BR. L., M.N., Z. Y., &c.], and had also summoned the said [C. D.]
to be and appear at this day and place, as by the said warrant he was commanded ,
and the said freeholders, being called, appear, and are severally sworn or affirmed. And
the said [A. B.] also appears, and the said [magistrate], and the aforesaid freeholders,
proceed to hear and examine the proofs and allegations offered by the said parties, and do
find that the said [A. B.],on the [tenth] day of [June 1882], was quietly and peaceably
14 Y. 523, 28.4 R.480. 1 Penn. St.126. 828. & R. 480. 2 Penn. St. 293. 8 Phila. 244:
62 Ibid. 133. 4 24 Leg. Int. 140.
14 Y.523. 58.@R.174, 1 Ash. 127. 6 @7 Penn. St. 242.
LANDLORD AND TENANT. 625
ossessed of a [certain house with the appurtenances, situate on the n i 5 =
En street, No. 373, between Third ene Boast streets, in the city “Ot Philadelphect
and being so thereof possessed, on the same day and year last aforesaid, demised the said
remises to the said [C. D.] for the term of [two years] then next ensuing, at the
Taceranll rent of [five hundred dollars], and that the said fo’ D.], by virtue of the said
demise, entered into possession of the said demised premises, and held the same during
the said term, and is still possessed of the same, and that the said term for which the said
premises were demised is fully ended, and the said [A. B.] being desirous, upon the
determination of the said term, to have again and repossess the said premises, for that
urpose did, on the [thirtieth] day of [November 1883], demand of and require the said
[c. D.] to remove from and leave the same, and that the said [C. D.] hath hitherto re-
used, and still doth refuse, to comply with the said demand and requisition to remove
from and leave the said premises, and the said freeholders assess the sum of [one hundred
and forty dollars] for the damages of the said [A. B.], occasioned by the unjust detention
of the said demised premises. Therefore, it is considered and adjudged by the said
[magistrate], that the said [A. B.] shall and do recover and have of the said [C. D.] as
well the said sum of [one hundred and forty dollars], for his damages aforesaid, as [forty
dollars] for his reasonable costs by him expended in and about his suit in this behalf.
concerning which the premises aforesaid we do make this our record. In testimony
whereof, the said [magistrate], to this his record hath set his hand and seal, at the city
of [Philadelphia], aforesaid, this [eighteenth] day of [June], one thousand eight hundred
and eighty-four. G. H., Magistrate. [srau.]
III. PRocrEDINGS BEFORE A AINGLE JUSTICE.
1. Under the act of 14 December, 1863.
The act 14th December 1863" provides, that where any person or persons in this
state, having leased or demised any lands or tenements to any person or persons, for
a term of one or more years or at will,? shall be desirous, upon the determination of
said lease, to have again and repossess such demised premises, having given three
months’ notice of such intention to his lessee or tenant, and said lessee or tenant
shall refuse to leave and surreuder up the said premises at the expiration of said
term, in compliance with the terms of said notice, it shall be lawful for such lessor,
his agent or attorney, to complain thereof to any justice of the peace in the city,
borough or county wherein the demised premises lie, whose duty it shall be to sum-
mon the defendant to appear at a day fixed, as in other civil actions; and upon due
proof being made, the tenant having notice of the time and place of hearing, that
the said lessor was quietly and peaceably possessed of the lands or tenements so
required to be surrendered up, and that he demised the same to the tenant in pos-
session, or to some other person under whom such tenant claims, and that the term
for which the same were demised is fully ended, and that three months’ previous
notice had been given of his desire to repossess the same, then and in that case, if
it shall appear right and proper to the said justice, he shall enter judgment ayainst
the said tenant, that he forthwith give up the possession of the said premises to the
said lessor ; and the said justice shall also give judgment in favor of the lessor, and
against the lessee or tenant, for such damages as, in his opinion, the said lessor may
have sustained, and for all the costs of the proceeding; and he shall forthwith issue
his warrant to any constable in the county, commanding him immediately to deliver
to the lessor, his agent or attorney, full possession of the said demised premises,
and to levy the damages and costs awarded and taxed by the said justice, of the
goods and chattels of the lessee or tenant, or other person in possession; any law,
custom or usage to the contrary notwithstanding: Provided, That the defendant
may, at any time within ten days after the rendition of judgment, appeal to the
court of common pleas, in the manner provided in the first section of an act relative
to landlords and tenants, approved April 8d, 1880: And provided further, That
such appeal shall not be a supersedeas to the warrant of possession aforesaid,* but
1 Purd. 1165. 8 Or alderman, by act 11 April 1866. Pamph.
2 The act 20 February 1867 provides, that this 97.
act shall apply to cases in which the owner or * So much of this act as provides that an appeal
owners of the demised premises have acquired shall not be a supersedeas, is ropealed as to the
title thereto by descent or purchase from the citv of Philadelphia, by act 24 June 1869. Purd.
original lessor or lessors. Purd. 1166. See 75 1166.
Penn. St. 389,
40
626 LANDLORD AND TENANT.
shall be tried in the same manner as actions of ejectment; and if the jury shall find
in favor of the tenant, they shall also assess the damages which he shall have sus-
tained by reason of his removal from the premises ; and for the amount found by
the jury, judgment shall be rendered in his favor, with costs of suit, and that he
recover possession of the premises, and he shall have the necessary writ or writs of
execution to enforce said judgment: And provided further, That the tenant may
have a writ of certiorari, to remove the proceedings of the justice,as in other
cases.
The act 6th March 1872 provides, that proceedings shall not be had under the act
of 1863, unless founded upon a written lease or contract in writing, or on a parol
agreement by which the relation of landlord and tenant is established between the
parties, and a certain rent is therein reserved ;+ the case of a lease at will, without
a reservation of any kind is not within the statute.* It is essential, in order to sus-
tain the jurisdiction, that the record should show that a certain rent was reserved.”
A tenant at will holding over, under such circumstances, is a mere trespasser.*
The act of 1863 is constitutional ;> and is to receive the same liberal construction
as that previously given to the act of 1772 ;* it furnishes a complete system of
obtaining possession by a landlord.” Proceedings will lie, under the act, where the
term was determined by forfeiture or breach of condition.®
2. Practice and proceedings.
Under the act of 1863, the first thing to be considered is the notice to quit.
This may be given in the same form as under the act of 1772 (supra). But under .
this act, the notice must be given three months prior to the expiration of the term;
whilst under that of 1772, it may be given after the end of the term.® And it is
not requisite that the notice should require the tenant to quit “at the expiration
of his term ;” it is sufficient, that he be required ‘‘ to remove from and leave the
premises,” and that this notice be given three months before the expiration of his
term? A three months’ notice to quit on the 12th May, is in time, if served on
the 12th February preceding." An attornment to the grantee of the lessor does
not affect the commencement and termination of the term ;” a grantee of the
reversion may recover possession without an attornment.’* In the city of Philadel-
phia, if, from the lapse of time, or change of ownership, the landlord be in doubt,
as to the time of the expiration of the tenant’s current term, he is provided with
a perfect remedy by the act of 28th February 1865; this act extends to the
assignee of the original lessor.“* He may give notice to the tenant of his inability
to produce proof of the termination of the term, and require the latter, within thirty
days, to furnish him in writing with the date at which his tenancy commenced,
This notice need not be accompanied by an affidavit.!> But to give jurisdiction
under this act, the record must show a tenancy from year to year, or otherwise,
and that the term, or the first year, has ended."* The notice may be waived by the
tenant.” And the lessor, after a sale of the premises may give notice to quit for
the benefit of his alieuee.’®
On the expiration of the term and of the notice to quit, if the tenant still retain
possession, the landlord, his agent or attorney, must present a complaint, on oath,
to a magistrate, in the following form:
CoMPLAINT UNDER THE ACT oF 1863.
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ss.
On the first day of March, a. p. 1880, personally appeared before me, the subscriber,
one of the magistrates in and for the cily of Philadelphia, A. B., who, being duly sworn
according to law, doth depose and say, that on the 26th day of February, a. p. 1879, he
1 Purd. 1167. 10 6 Phila. 310. 54 Penn. St. 90.
2 89 Ponn. St. 463. 11 1 Browst. 397, 64 Penn. St. 240,
® 1 Leg. Rec. R. 131. 12 64 Penn. St. 300. 7 Phila. 301.
41W.& 8.90. 17 Penn. St. 467. 54 Ibid. 86. 18 10 Phila. 500. 64 Penn. St. 300.
5 51 Penn. St. 412. 6 Phila. 35, 62. M4 24 Leg. Int. 92.
6 54 Ibid. 90. 16 54 Ponn, St. 232. 24 Leg. Int. 92.
: a re ae eae = Ha St. 230. See 8 Phila. 297,
id. 475. uz. L. Reg. ‘i ll Ibid. 472. 89 Ibid. 191. A: i
9 54 Penn, St. 86. 6 Phila. 6. 2 Pears. 81. 61. eee aes
25 Leg. Int. 165. ==
LANDLORD AND TENANT. 627
was quietly in the possession of a certain messuage or tenement, with the appurtenances,
situate on the west side of North Tenth street (No. 1980), in said city; that on the said
last-mentioned day he demised said premises to a certain O. D., for the full term of one
year, at the annual rent of three hundred dollars, which said term is fully ended; that
the said A. B. being desirous, upon the expiration of the said term, to have again anJ
repossess the said premises, for that purpose did, three months previous to such expira-
tion, demand and require of the said C. D. to remove from and leave the same, and that
the said C. D. having hitherto refused, and still refusing to comply therewith, he makes
this complaint, that such proceedings may be taken as are directed by the act of assembly
in such cases made and provided. A.
Sworn and subscribed before me, this first day of March, a. p. 1880.
J. B., Magistrate.
If the lessor proceed under the act of 1865, in consequence of his inability to
produce proof of the commencement and termination of the term, the complaint may
be as follows: varied to suit the circumstances of the particular case.
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ss.
On the first day uf March 1880, personally appeared before me, the subscriber, one of
the magistrates of the city of Philadelphia, A. B., who, being duly sworn according to
law, doth depose and say, that in the year 1877, one C. D., being quietly in the posses-
sion of acertain messuage or tenement, with the appurtenances [describing the premises],
demised the same to one E. F., as tenant from year to year, at the annual rent of three
hundred dollars, the first year of which tenancy is fully ended; that the said C. D., after
the making of the said demise, granted the reversion of the said demised premises to
him, the said A. B.; that he, the said A. B., having lost the evidence of the beginning
and conclusion of the said term, and being unable to produce proof of the same, did, on
the first day of June 1879, according to the statute in such case made and provided, give
notice in writing to G. H., who entered under the said E. F., of his inability to make
such proof, and did require the said G. H., within thirty days thereafter, to furnish the
said A. B. in writing with the date at which his term of tenancy commenced ; that the said
G. H., on the 25th day of June 1879, made affidavit, and served the same upon the
said A. B., that he was unable to comply with the requirement of the said A. B., because
he became tenant of the demised premises, as assignee of E. F., the original lessee, who did
not inform him when the said tenancy commenced ; that the said A. B., being desirous to
obtain possession of the said demised premises, did, thereupon, on the first day of August
1879, demand and require the said G. H. to remove from and leave the same; and that
although six months have elapsed since the giving of the said notice, the said G. H. hath
hitherto refused and still doth refuse to comply therewith ; wherefore, he makes this his
complaint, that such proceedings may be taken as are directed by the act of assembly in
such case made and provided. ; A. B.
Sworn and subscribed, before me, this first day of March 1880.
J. B., Magistrate.
Such complaint being filed, the justice is required to issue a summons to the lessee
or tenant ; the form of which may be varied to meet the circumstances of the par-
titular case, where the landlord is compelled to avail himself of the provisions of
the act of 1865, and in such case, the record must also conform to the complaint.
SUMMONS UNDER THE act oF 1863.
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ss.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To any Constable of the said city, greeting:
WueErzas, it appears to me, the subscriber, one of the magistrates in and for the city
of Philadelphia, by complaint on oath, that A. B. was, on the 26th day of February, a. p.
1879, quietly in the possession of a certain messuage or tenement, with the appurten-
ances, situate on the west side of North Tenth Street, No. 1080, in said city; that on the
said last-mentioned day, he demised said premises to a certain C. D., for the full term of
one year, at the annual rent of three hundred dollars, which said term is fully ended ;
and that the said A. B. being desirous, upon the expiration of the said term, to have
again and repossess the said premises, for that purpose did, three months previous to
such expiration, demand and require of the said C. D. to remove from and leave the
same; and that the said C. D. hath hitherto refused, and still doth refuse, to comply
therewith. You are therefore hereby commanded, to summon the said C. D. to be and
appear on the seventh day of March, a. n. 1880, between the hours of two and three
628 LANDLORD AND TENANT.
o’clock in the afternoon, at the office of the subscriber, No. 8 North Seventh street, in
the said city, to show cause, if any he has, why restitution of the possession of the said
demised premises should not be forthwith made to the aforesaid A. B., according tc the
form and effect of the act of assembly in such case made and provided. And this you
shall in nowise omit. In witness whereof, the said magistrate has hereunto set his hand
and seal, the first day of March, a, p. 1880.
J. B., Magistrate. [szat.]
‘
On the return of the summons, which may be served in the same manner as any
other writ, it is the duty of the justice to go on and hear the case, and to decide
ou the evidence, as to right and justice may belong. ‘The writ may be served on
the defendant, personally, at his dwelling-house, by leaving a copy of the original,
and making known the contents thereof ;' it should contain a brief statement of
the cause of action.?
Having heard the case, the justice is required by law to make a record of the
finding ; and here it is that he experiences the greatest difficulty—more judgments
being reversed on certiorari, for want of precision in making up the record, than
from any other cause. A form of record is here given, which, it is believed, will
stand the test of judicial criticism, and the decisions on the subject are also appended
for the information of the magistrate.
In the first place, it is not necessary that the justice should set forth the statute
under which the proceedings are had; it is sufficient that he find all the facts
essential to the jurisdiction exercised ;* but his record must contain every essential
to support the judgment; nothing can be taken by intendment.* The averments
in the record must agree with those of the complaint ;° the justice must find the
facts set forth in the complaint to be true;® but the act does not require him to
set forth in his judgment, the date of the lease, the expiration of the term, or the
date of the notice to quit.’ It is not enough, however, to enter judgment for
the complainant; the justice must make an inquest of the facts required to found the
jurisdiction ;? and it must appear that there was legal evidence before him to
justify the finding? :
The justice is further required to enter judgment for the damages assessed ; a
mere finding of the amount of damages is insufficient.'° He must give judgment
for the damages from the evidence in the case ;" a formal judgment for rent, cures
an error in assessing it. A judgment will not be reversed because in favor of one
aa the agent of an estate ;° a judgment for possession in favor of the lessor’s
agent, and for damages in favor of the lessor, is good. It is not competent for the
tenant to set up that his lessor was merely the agent of the owners of an undivided
portion of the premises, and that the latter have revoked his agency. .A claim of
title in a third person cannot be interposed in a proceeding under this act; ® but
tenant may show that his landlord’s title has expired ;” or that, being in posses-
sion under another landlord, he was induced by fraud avd misrepresentation to
accept the lease upon which the proceedings are based * ;
Where the tenant sues out a certiorari to remove the case to the common pleas,
it is essential that the recognisance be given in the form prescribed by the act of
1865, or the certiorari will be quashed.® That act, making a certiorart a super-
sedeas, does not. apply to proceedings by a purchaser at a judicial sale, who disafirms
the lease.” A writ of error lies to the judgment of the common pleas, on certiorari,
and it is a supersedeas.”
1 64 Penn. St. 90. 8 Phila. 239, 126 Phila. 313.
2 67 Penn. St. 149. 18 Thid. 311.
8 24 Leg. Int. 140, The record is not tobe too M4 24 Leg. Int. 140.
nicely scanned as to form. 2 Wood. 65. 15 51 Penn, St. 499.
4 62 Penn. St.133. 2 Pars. 205, 2 Wood. 410. 8 58 Ibid. 137, 62 Ibid. 177. And see 54 Ibid.
5 25 Leg. Int. 165. 90. 61 Lbid. 491.
6 23 Ibid. 126. 17 14 Luz. L. Reg. 257.
1 6 Phila, 310. But sce 2 Pears. 295. 1 Wood. 18 62 Penn. St. 177.
410. 2 19 6 Philn. 39. A certiorari lies from the supreme
8 6 Phila. 43. court. 3 Penny. 25.
® Thid. 49, 135. And ve 61 Penn, St.491, 2 % 6 Phila. 307. And it does not apply to a
Browst. 528. warrant of -possession, issued under the act of
10 6 Phila. 156. 1772. 81 Penn, St. 217.
11 Thid. 62. 21 6 Phila. 59,329. 16 W. N.C. 115.
LANDLORD AND TENANT. 629
A recognisance of bail in error taken on a writ of error to remove the judgment
of the common pleas, on certiorar?, under that act, binds the parties, on affirmance,
to the payment, not only of the damages awarded by the magistrate, but of all rent
accrued and to accrue up to the time of final judgment.
When a case is brought into the common pleas, by appeal, a declaration is un-
necessary ; the defendant may be ruled to plead to the statement contained in the
transcript. Where a landlord has ejected the tenant, under the judgment of a
justice, and the case is tried on an appeal, the tenant can show his damage by the
removal, and the value of the place to him. In such case, the landlord cannot
suffer a nonsuit, on the trial of. the appeal.®
DooKET-ENTRY UNDER THE ACT oF 1868.
Davin Evans
vs.
JoHN JONES.
costs.
Magistrate.
Complaint . -. - -« 5
Oath . . + 6+ «© «2 10
Summons . . « + + 7
Returnandoath . . «5s 35
Hearing and determining . 1.00
Sonths . . . . . » 80
2witnesses - oe : - 50
Record of proceedings . z. 1.50
Writ of restitution =. . 1.00
Constable.
Serving summons . 2 1.00
Mile; : . . . .
Executing writ of restitution 2.00
Mileage . . . a
39.65
Lanpiorp and Tenant casE. March lst, 1880, David Evans
appears and makes complaint, on oath, that on the 26th day of
February 1879, he was quietly in the possession of a certain
messuage or tenement, with the appurtenances, situate on the
west side of North Tenth street (No. 1080), in the city of
Philadelphia; that on the said last-mentioned day he demised
said premises to a certain John Jones, for the full term of one
year, at the annual rent of three hundred-dollars, which said
term is fully ended; that the said David Evans being desirous,
upon the expiration of the said term, to have again and re-
possess the said premises, for that purpose did, three months
previous to such expiration, demand and require of the said
John Jones to remove from and leave the same; and the
said John Jones having hitherto refused and still refusing to
comply therewith, he makes this complaint that such proceed-
ings may be taken as are directed by the act of assembly in
such case made and provided. Same day, summons issued,
returnable the 6th March, between the hours of 3 and 4 o’clock p.m. J. Miller, const.,
returned, on oath, ‘“‘ served personally on defendant, at his dwelling-house, by leaving a
eopy of the original summons, and making known the contents thereof, 1st March 1880.”
And now, March 6th, 1880, parties appear. E. M. Evans aff'd forlessor. John J. Miller
sw. for lessor. John Jones, lessee, sw. After hearing, the magistrate finds the foregoing
complaint in all particulars just and true, and it appearing right and proper, enters judg-
ment against the said lessee or tenant, that he shall forthwith deliver actual possession
of the said premises to the said lessor ; and also enters judgment, publicly, in favor of
the said lessor and against the said lessee, as tenant, for the sum of twenty dollars for
damages, that being the amount, in the opinion of the magistrate, the lessor has sustained,
besides six dollars 45; for costs of proceeding.’
If the defendant appeal, add the following :—
March 10th, 1880, defendant appeals. Affidavit filed. I am held in $500 as absolute
bail in this case, conditioned for the payment of all costs that have accrued or may
accrue, in case judgment shall be affirmed; and also for all rent that has accrued or
may accrue up to the time of final judgment. J. W.
Under the act of 1865, no writ of possession can be issued by the alderman, until
the expiration of’ the ten days allowed for a certiorari.’ After the lapse of that
time, if no appeal be taken, or certiorari sued out, he may issue a writ of restitu-
tion, in the following form :
151 Penn. St. 416. 12 W. N.C. 179. that the appeal is not extended for delay. 3 W.
26 Phila, 108, On such appeal, the plaintiff WN. C. 325. ;
must show a tenancy, which is the foundation of 4 If the proceedings be had under the act of
the jurisdiction; and the tenant may set up any 1865, the docket entry must be made to conform
defence which he could have done, in ejectment to the complaint, eupra, p. 612.
by his lessor. 62 Penn. St. 177. 5 6 Phila. 38.
357 Penn, St.168. There must be an affidavit
630 LANDLORD AND TENANT.
WRIT OF RESTITUTION UNDER ACT OF 1863.
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ss.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To any Constable of the said city, greeting: .
Wuersas, due proof hath been made before me, the subscriber, one of the magistrates
in and for the city of Philadelphia, that A. B. did, on the 2th day of February, a. p.
1879, demise tc C. D. a certain messuage or tenement, with the appurtenances, situate
[on the west side of North Tenth street, No. 1080], in said city, for the full term of one
year, at a yearly rent of three hundred dollars, which said term is fully ended; that the
said A. B., being desirous upon the expiration of the said term, to have again and repossess
the said premises, for that purpose did, three months-previous to such expiration, demand
and require of the said C. D. to remove from and leave the same; and that the said C.
D. hath hitherto refused, and still doth refuse to comply therewith: all which premises
being duly found by me, the said magistrate, according to the form of the act of general
assembly in such cases made and prov.ded. You are therefore hereby commanded, forth-
with to deliver to the said A. B. full possession of the demised premises aforesaid. And
you are also commanded, that of the goods and chattels of the said C. D. in your baili-
wick, you cause to be levied as well the sum of twenty dollars, which the said A. B.
has awarded for damages sustained by the unjust detention of the premises, as six dollars
and forty five cents, for his costs and charges by him in and about his suit in that behalf
expended, whereof the said C. D. is convict, And hereof fail not.
Witness our said magistrate, at the city of Philadelphia aforesaid, the 17th day of
March, a. v. 1880.
J. B., Magistrate. [szat.]
These details constitute the proceedings by which a landlord may repossess him-
self of his premises at the expiration of the time for which he had demised the
property ; and such are the privileges with which a tenant is invested. While it
is but just that he should surrender the premises at the expiration of the time
agreed upon; the law recognises it as equally fair and just that the landlord should
give ample notice of his intention and desire to repossess himself of the property,
when the tenure has expired, and the terms of the original agreement have been
fulfilled.
The proceedings already detailed are to be had where the tenant pays his rent,
and are only for the purpose of repossessing the landlord of his premises at the
expiration of the time for which they had been demised. The damages allowed for
holding over being merely incidental, and with a view to prevent a multiplicity of
lawsuits.
IV. PRocEEDINGS TO RECOVER POSSESSION FOR NON-PAYMENT OF RENT.
Besides these proceedings for the recovery of the demised premises at the expira-
tion of the term, there are cases of an entirely distinct character, in which the
landlord is permitted, by another course, to repossess himself of his property during
the term for which it was demised. These are, where the tenant refuses or neglects
to pay his rent, and where there are not, upon the premises, sufficient goods, liable to
distress, to secure its payment. Frequent and glaring instances of the failure
of justice in such case, induced the passage of the act of 1830, by which these
evils are remedied.*
That act (as amended in 1861) provides, that in case any lessee for a term of
years, or at will, or otherwise, of a messuage, land or tenements, upon the demise
whereof any reuts are or shall be reserved, where the lessee shall neglect or refuse
to pay rent reserved, as often as the same may grow due according to the terms of
the contract, and where there are not goods on the premises adequate to pay the
said rent, so in arrear, except such articles as are exempt from levy and sale by
the laws of the commonwealth, it shall and may be lawful for the lessor to give the
lessee notice to quit the premises within fifteen days from the date of the notice,
if such notice is given on or after the first day of April, and before the first of Sep-
tember ; and within thirty days {rom the date thereof, if given on or after the first
of September, and before the first day of April.
And if the lessee shall not, within the period aforesaid, remove from and deliver
1 Act 8 April 1830. Purd. 1167. This highly remedial statute was drafted by that eminent jurist,
the late Judge Edward King.
LANDLORD AND TENANT. 631
up the said premises to the said lessor, or pay and satisfy the rent so due and in
arrear, it shall be lawful for the lessor to make complaint, on oath or affirmation, to
any wderman or justice of the peace,’ as the case may require, who, on its appear-
ing to him, that the lessor bas demised the premises for a term of years, or other-
wise, whereof any rent or rents have been reserved; that the said rent is in arrear
and unpaid; that there are not sufficient goods and chattels on the premises to
pay and satisfy the said rent, except such goods as are by law exempt from levy and
sale; and that the lessee has, after being notified in manner aforesaid, refused to
remove and deliver up possession of the premises; shall then, and in that case,
issue his precept, reciting substantially the complaint and allegation of the lessor,
directed to any constable of the proper city or county, commanding him to sum
mon the said lessee to appear before the said alderman or justice, at a day and
time to be therein fixed, not less than three, nor more than eight days thereafter,
to answer the said complaint.
And the said alderman or justice shall, on the day appointed, or on some other
day then to be appointed by said justice or alderman, proceed to hear the case;
and if it shall appear that the said complaint, so made, as aforesaid, by the lessor,
isin all particulars just and true, then the said alderman or justice shall enter
judgment against such lessee, that the premises shall be delivered up to the lessor,
and, at the request of the lessor, issue a writ of possession directed to the said con-
stable, commanding him, forthwith, to deliver actual possession of the premises to
the lessor, and also to levy the costs on the defendant, in the same manner that
costs are now by law levied and collected on other writs of execution ; but if on the
hearing aforesaid, it shall appear that the said complaint is vexatious and unfounded,
the said alderman, or justice shall dismiss the same, with costs to be paid by the
lessor.
Provided always, That at any time before the said writ of possession is actually
executed, the lessee may supersede and render the said writ of none effect, by pay-
ing to the said constable, for the use of the lessor, the rent actually due and in
arrear, and the costs ; which rent, so in arrear, shall be ascertained and determined
by the said alderman or justice on due and legal proof, and indorsed by him on the
said writ of possession, together with the costs of the proceeding: of all of which
doings the said constable shall make return to the said alderman or justice, within
ten days after receiving of the said writ, and the said constable shall be answerable
in default of executing the said writ according to its lawful requisitions, or in return-
ing the same, in the same manner, as to the amount of rent ascertained and deter-
mined, and costs, as constables are now by law answerable on other writs of
execution.
And provided further, That no writ of possession shall be issued by the said
alderman or justice, for five days after the rendition of judgment; and if, within
the said five days, the tenant shall give good, sufficient and absolute security, by
recognisanee, for all costs that may have and may accrue, in case the judgment
shall be affirmed, and also for all rent that has accrued, or may accrue, up to the
time of final judgment,? then the tenant shall be entitled to an appeal to the next
court of common pleas; which appeal shall be then tried in the same manner that
other suits are tried: And provided further, That nothing herein contained shall
prevent the issuing of a certiorari, with the usual form and effect.
It will be seen that, like the act of 1772, the operation of this act is limited
to cases of lease where ‘a certain rent” is reserved, and all that has been said in
reference to what is there necessary, must be considered as applicable here. Where,
therefore, a certain rent which has been reserved becomes due and payable, and
there are not on the premises sufficient goods subject to distress, out of which the
rent may be collected, then the landlord is entitled to the remedies of this act. If
* there be on the premises sufficient goods for the security of the rent, he must in
order to collect his rent, distrain, and cannot invoke the benefit of this law. But
being thus within the law, his rent being due, and there not being sufficient property
1 Jurisdiction was conferred as a single justice 3 See the local acts of 4 May 1864, and 17 April
by the act 22 March 1861. Purd. 1168. 1869, giving a remedy where the rent is reserved
2 By act 9 April 1849, the act of 1845, relating in services, which apply to Mercer county only.
Ka bail on appeal, is not to apply to appeals under Purd. 1169.
this act.
6382 » LANDLORD AND TENANT.
to distrain upon, then the landlord may give the tenant the required notice to quit
the premises. With a view to guard the tenant from injustice, inconvenience or
oppression, the time of notice is varied according to the season of the year. If the
notice be given after the first of April and before the first of September of the same
year, then /ifteen days’ notice suffices; at any other period, a notice of thirty days is
required. The notice must be express and explicit in its terms, notifying the tenant
to remove at the expiration of the time fixed by law.
ForM OF NOTICE UNDER THE acT oF 1830.
Philadelphia, April 20th, 1884.
You are hereby notified to quit the premises situate in [Dock] street, No. [24], which
I have leased to you, reserving rent—“ or pay and satisfy the rent due and in arrear,”’
being $25, which amount was due on the first day of April 1884, and is hereby demanded
(you having neglected or refused to pay the amount so reserved, as often as the same has
grown due, according to the terms of our contract—and there being no goods on the
remises adequate to pay the rent so reserved, except such articles as are exempt from
evy and sale by the laws of this commonwealth), within fifteen days from the date
thereof, or I.shall proceed ugainst you as the law directs.
To C.D. Yours, &c., A. B.
[The person who serves this notice should compare the copy with the original, and
note, in writing, the day on which he serves it, so that he may be ready, if called upon,
to prove these facts. |
If, during the days of grace allowed the tenant, that is to say, the fifteen or
thirty days, as the season shall require, he remove and deliver up possession, no
further action is required; the landlord must seek his rent only as a simple con-
tract creditor, the rent becoming, what is generally called, a common debt ; all that
the notice sought to obtain, has been already attained by the removal. If he
remove, however, during the pendency of the proceedings, without notice to his
landlord, he continues liable for the rent until their termination.!. But if the ten-
ant do not remove, then must the lessor, at the expiration of the time stated in the
notice, apply to a magistrate and make oath or affirmation of tks cause of cowplaint ;
he must also satisfy the magistrate, either by his own examination under oath or
affirmation, or other satisfactory evidence, of all the matters upon which the notice
was based, together with the fact of the service of the notice, and the non-compli-
ance with its demands; and when the magistrate is satisfied of these premises,
then the law makes it his duty to summon the tenant to appear before him at a
place and on a day and time certain, to answer the complaint.
CoMPLAINT UNDER THE act oF 1830.
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ss.
On the [sixth] day of [May] a. p. 1884, personally appeared before me, one of the
magistrates of the city of Philadelphia, [A. B.], who being duly sworn according to law,
saith, that on the [first] day of [August] a. p. 1883, he demised the premises situated in
(Walnut street, No. 356], in the said city, to a certain [C. D.|, for the term of one year,
reserving an annual rent of one hundred dollars, payable monthly, on the first day of
each and every month, during the said term; that on the first day of April 1854, three
months of the said rent, amounting to $25, was in arrear and unpaid; that on the 20th
day of April 1884, he gave notice in writing to the said |C. D.] that said amount of rent
was due and unpaid, and demanded payment of the same, or in default thereof, that he
should quit the said premises, and surrender up the possession of the same, within
fifteoen| days from the service of the said notice ; that at the time of the service thereof
there were not, and are not, sufficient goods and chattels on the demised premises to pay
and satisfy the said arrears of rent, except such as are by law exempt from levy and sale; ,
and that though fifteen days have elapsed since the service of the said notice, the said
[C. D.] refuseth to render and deliver up the possession of the said premises.
(Signed) A. B.
Sworn and subscribed before G. H., Magistrate.
1 4 Phila. 31.
LANDLORD AND TENANT. 6383
SUMMONS UNDER THE act oF 1830.
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ss.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To any Constable of the said city, greeting :
Wuerszas, complaint on oath hath been made before [G. H.], one of our magistrates
of said city, by [A. B.], that on the first day of August 1883, he demised a certain tene- .
ment, situated in | Walnut street, No. 356], in the said city, to [C. D.], for the term of
one year, reserving rent; which rent is in arrear and unpaid; that there are not suffi-
cient goods and chattels on the premises to pay and satisfy the said rent, except such as
are by law exempt from levy and sale ; and that the said lessee has, after being uotified
according to law, refused to remove and deliver up possession of the said premises. You
are, therefore, commanded to summon the said [C. D.] to be and appear before our said
magistrate, at his office, [No. 20 North Fourth street], the [tenth| day of [May] 1884,
between the hours of nine and ten o’clock a. m., to answer the said complaint. ~ In wit-
ness whereof, the said magistrate hath hereunto set his hand and seal, the [sixth] day
of [May] 1884. G. H., Magistrate. [szat.]
Upon the return of the summons, the magistrate proceeds to hear the case in the
same manner as other causes; all the allegations of the complaint requiring to be
supported by legal proof. The case is regularly tried, giving to both landlord and
tenant equal rights and privileges in regard to the conduct of the proceedings
and the production of testimony. If, upon the trial thus had, the complaint be
found in all respects true, and all its allegations be sustained by legal and compe-
tent proof, then it is the duty of the magistrate to enter judgment for the redelivery
of the premises by the tenant to the landlord, which, if he do not, within five days,
a writ of possession may issue, by authority of which, possession of the demised
premises is delivered to the complainant, and at the same time, the costs of the pro-
ceeding are collected.
WRI? OF POSSESSION UNDER THE act oF 1830
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ss.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To any Constable of the said city, greeting:
Waereas, complaint and due proof was made on the [sixth] day of [May], a. p. 1884,
before [G. H.], one of our magistrates for the said city, that [A. B.] demised to [C. D.] a
certain tenement in the said city, [No. 356 Walnut street], the rent whereof “is in arrear
and unpaid ; that there are not sufficient goods and chattels on the premises to pay or
satisfy the said rent, except such as are by law exempt from levy or sale, and that the
said lessee has, after being notified,” according to law, ‘‘ refused to remove and redeliver
up possession of the premises,” according to the act of assembly in such case made and
provided ; and whereon the said magistrate, on consideration of the premises, did enter
Judgment against said lessee, that said premises should be delivered up to the lessor
forthwith, and did also ascertain the rent in arrear to amount to the sum of [twenty-
five] dollars. Therefore we command you, the said constable, judgment having been
entered by our said magistrate against the said [C. D.], forthwith to deliver actual pos-
session of the said premises to | A. B.], the lessor,’’ and we also command you that you
‘levy the costs, indorsed hereon, of the goods and chattels of the said [C. D.]. And hereof
fail not; and of your proceedings herein, together with this writ, make return to our
said magistrate, ‘“‘within ten days,” to wit, on or before the [26th] day of [May], a. p. 1884.
Witness our said magistrate, at Philadelphia, who hath hereunto set his hand and seal,
this [sixteenth] day of [May], a. p. 1884. G. H., Magistrate. [szat.]
The tenant, however, may, at any time before he is ousted from his possession,
by payment of the rent due and in arrear ¢the amount of which the magistrate
ascertains on the trial, and indorses upon the writ of possession, together with the
costs) suspend further proceedings; or, if he be dissatisfied and consider himself
aggrieved by the decision of the magistrate, he is entitled to an appeal to the court
of common pleas, in like manner as other appeals, upon his entering absolute surety
for the amount which may be adjudged against him. This security is for absolute
payment, and not, as in ordinary cases, only for payment of the costs which may
accrue. If the amount be not fully paid by the debtor, the surety is absolutely
bound for its payment ;: the same as the bail provided by law for stay of execution.
634 LANDLORD AND TENANT.
DocKEt-ENTRY UNDER THE ACT oF 1830.
A.B. LanLorp AND TENANT casE. May 6th, 1884, the plaintiff
vs. appears and complains, on oath, that on the first day of August
Cc. D. 1883, he demised to the defendant a tenement, No. 356 Wal-
nut street, in the city of Philadelphia, for the term of one year,
at an annual rent of one hundred dollars, payable monthly ;
costs.
Magiatrate, that on the first day of April 1884, three months of said rent,
Gomplaint . 5 + + + 3) amounting to $25, was in arrear and unpaid; that on the 20th
freeept ss: ot + + 38] April 1884, he notified the said defendant that such amount of
Beal : 60 | rent was due, and demanded payment thereof, or in default that
Witeess. > 2: 2 ¢ + 22] the said defendant should quit the said premises, within fifteen
Wear possession’ °° * 2) | days from the service of said notice; that there are not on the said
’ premises sufficient goods, &c., exempted from levy ; and that
see too | the defendant, after being so notified, has neglected and refused
Mileage. : : : : “so | to deliver up said premises. Sameday, summons issued, return-
Fagauing writ of possession == 2.00 | able the 10th inst., at9 to 10 4.a. J. W., constable. Returned,
sa) | 00 oath, ‘served by delivering a true copy to the defendant,
—— | personally, upon the premises, 6th May.” May 10th, 1884,
parties appear. A. OC. sworn for plaintiff. Whereupon, on hearing, it appearing that
the above complaint is in all particulars just and true, judgment is entered against the
said defendant, that he deliver actual possession of the premises to the plaintiff ; and it
is ascertained that the rent due to the plaintiff is $25. May 16th, writ of possession
issued. Returnable the 26th. Possession given May 18th.
J. W., Constable.
If the defendant desire to appeal, security may be taken in the following form :
May 14th, 1884. Defendant appeals. Affidavit filed. Iam held in $500 as absolute
security, conditioned for the payment of all costs that have or may accrue
in case this judgment shall be affirmed ; and also for the payment of all
rent that has accrued, or may accrue, up to the time of final judgment.
(Signed) T. G.
May 20th, Transcript for the defendant.
The regularity and legal correctness of these proceedings may be inquired into
under a writ of certiorarz. This writ brings the record to the presence of the court,
and the proceedings are sustained or reversed upon their legality or illegality, as it
may appear upon the transcript of the proceedings. If the proceedings be atirmed
on certiorart, a writ of possession may issue from the common pleas."
In the case of Clark v. Everly,’ the following construction of this statute was
fixed by the court of common pleas of the county of Philadelphia (and although
their judgment was subsequently reversed by the supreme court, it was for a cause
entirely distinct from the construction of the act adopted by them on the following
points): 1. That the heir, devisee, or assignee of the lessor is entitled to the remedy
given by the act.* “ It will not be pretended, that he (the heir) could not maintain
an action of debt or covenant for the rent, or issue his warrant of distress; and
upon what principle is he authorized to assert those rights? Purely, because the
relation of tandlord and tenant exists, or, to use the language of this act, that of
lessor and lessee. Now, if this relationship is created by the death of the ancestor, the
lessor, and all his rights descend to the heir, most assuredly, he is clothed with all
the authority which belonged to the ancestor, and consequently he may use all the
remedies for enforcing these rights given by the law, which the original lessor had.
The right and the remedy must attend each other.’ 2. The lessor must accompany
his notice to quit, with a demand for the amount of rent claimed, when given to
the lessee. ‘ This right given to the lessor to give a notice, and then commence
these proceedings, is only another means of enforcing the payment of the rent, and
that too in a way much more summary than by the warrant of distress; and no
principle is better settled, than that a distress-warrant must set forth a sum certain,
which is due for the rent, in order that the bailiff may know what amount of goods
to distrain, and to inform the tenant what sum of money he must tender, in order
to relieve his property from the seizure; and all the forms prescribed by the act of
1772 are based upon the supposition that a sum certain is demanded in the warrant
of the bailiff. If, then, this is only a means to compel the payment of rent, should
1 25 Penn. St. 350. 28Ww.&S. 226. 8 9 Penn. St. 213.
LANDLORD AND TENANT. 6385
not the tenant be apprised of the sum claimed? The latter part of the act also
provides that on the payment of the amount due, at any time before he is dispos-
sessed, he shall be entitled to retain the possession; clearly showing that the
amount of rent due is all that the lessor can demand. Now, a tenant may be willing
to pay all which is due; and suppose that he has paid all which has accrued, and
if informed of any default, would instantly discharge that sum. But if the land-
lord has only to give a notice to quit, he compels the lessee to become a party to a
lawsuit, against his will, no matter how desirous he may be to pay the rent.” 3. The
lessor must prove that there were not sufficient goods on the premises to pay the
rent; and if there were two or more premises included in the lease, he must prove
there was not sufficient on either of them.’ 4. The notice to quit must be served
on the individual residing on the premises. ‘The landlord is bound to serve
the notice of the non-payment of rent, upon the tenant in the actual possession at the
time, in order to deprive him of his estate. If he is a sub-lessee, he cannot be
turned out of his possession without notice; for he may be willing to pay the rent
demanded, rather than to be turned with his family into the street. From analogy
to all judicial proceedings for the recovery of the possession of real estate, the
tenant in possession must be served with process, or he is not affected by the judg-
ment of the tribunal that is to deprive him of his possession.” 5. In the same
ease, the supreme court decided, that the act does not apply to the case of a landlord
and tenant where the tenant refuses to pay rent, under a claim of right to the re-
version; if the title to the lands be in dispute, the justice cannot proceed under this
act.2 But the defendant’s affidavit that the title to the land will come in question,
will not oust the jurisdiction ; it must be shown in evidence.’ Nor will the affidavit
of a third person, stating that he claims the reversion, be enough for that purpose ;
as between the landlord and a party holding under him, no other title can come in
question, upon a proceeding to recover the rent, or, in case of non-payment of rent, to
obtain possesion.* If, however, an assertion that the title will come in question be sus-.
tained by evidence, it will defeat the jurisdiction, though not supported by affidavit.®
Under the act of 1830 process cannot issue, until the expiration of the notice to
quit.© The sheriff’s vendee of the landlord’s title is within its provisions.’ The
notice must be accompanied with a demand for the amount of rent claimed; and
it must be served on the party residing on the premises.2 The justice cannot
acquire jurisdiction, under a clause in the lease, substituting five days’ notice for
that required by the statute.? ;
As the complaint is the basis of the proceeding, it must set forth all the facts
necessary to give jurisdiction to the justice.” It must show the term for which the
premises were demised, and that the letting was for a term of years, or less period,
as the act does not extend to a tenant for life, or to a grantee in fee, subject to the
payment of an annual ground-rent. When a summary proceeding, in derogation
of the common law, is commenced, the facts necessary to confer jurisdiction must
appear on the face of the record? The form of complaint in general use for the
past fifty years, as contained in former editions of this work, was drafted by a
deceased member of the Philadelphia bar, then comparatively a young man; but it
has been pronounced by the supreme court to be insufficient to show jurisdiction in
the magistrate ; and therefore, justices when applied to for process under the act,
should be careful to see that the complaint is in the amended form herein given.
It must be shown, on the hearing, that there were not sufficient goods on the
demised preinises to satisfy the rent in arrear, except such as are exempt by law ;”
and if there were two or more premises included in the lease, it must be proved that
there was not sufficient on either of them.* Evidence must be adduced, showing
an examination of every part of the premises.”
If the complaint set out the facts necessary to give jurisdiction, and the justice
1 1 How. 217-18. And see 11 Johns. 1. ® 3 Phila. 304. 8 Ibid. 302. 9N. Y.36. See
217 W.N. ©, 434. 11 Penn. St. 472. 6 Phila. 61.
3 25 Penn. St. 350. 10 75 Penn. St. 341.
44 Phila. 350. 4 Leg. Gaz. 85. 76 Thid. 277. x
5 6 Phila. 312. And see 61 Penn. St. 497 12 43 Leg. Int. 4. °
§ 2 Luz. L. Obs. 196. B 8 W. & S. 228.
4 9 Penn. St. 213. 8 W. & S. 227. 14 Tbid.
8 W. & S. 228-9. 15 1 How. 217-18. And see 11 Johns. 1,
636 LANDLORD AND TENANT.
‘
find these facts to be true, it is sufficient ;} but the record must show the jurisdic.
tion affirmatively? The judgment must be for the possession ; not in the alternative,
for an amount of rent, or possession ;* the justice cannot enter judgment for the
rent in arrear ;* nor issue execution for it. And it is error, to calculate the rent in
arrear up to a day subsequent to the giving of the notice to quit. A finding that
there is no rent in arrear, is conclusive of the question, in a replevin for goods sub-
sequently distrained to satisfy the same claim.’ If the tenant remove during the
pendency of the proceedings, without notice to the landlord, he continues liable for
the rent, until their termination.® :
If the tenant appeal, and give security, it is sufficient, that the appeal be filed in
the prothonotary’s office on the first day of the next term.® And if the proceedings
be affirmed on certiorart, a writ of possession may issue from the common pleas.”
Such is the remedy provided by law in cases where the tenant remains in posses-
sion, and neglects or refuses to pay his rent, and there is no property on the premises
out of which the landlord can compel its payment. The provisions of the law are
plain and intelligible. It prescribes clearly under what state of facts the remedy
may be invoked ; what character of prima facie proof must be adduced before pro-
cess can be obtained; what full proof must be given ; the manner of enforcing
judgment, and the terms upon which the judgment may be suspended ; all these
are detailed and described so clearly, that no misunderstanding or difficulty can well
arise, and the law should never be invoked, except in cases where there is exhibited
a clear right to claim it.
Cases of gross violation of the terms of the lease often occur, where the landlord
is remediless under these statutes. For instance, A. lets his house to B., with an
express stipulation against under-letting any part of it, or conducting any manufac-
turing business, or having any deleterious occupation carried on in it. B. does
both, and being unable to answer in damages, an action against him would be
_unavailing. Can A. obtain repossession under the foregoing provisions? Such
questions occur daily with landlords, and are as often answered in the negative. It
was A.’s inadvertence, neglect or folly, to accept an irresponsible or knavish tenant,
without, at all events, inserting a clause in the lease, giving him a recourse to these
laws in the event of such a breach. Without it, A. appears to have no means of
redress under the acts just cited.
The only remedy in such case is by ejectment at common law. But the ingenuity
of modern conveyancers has amply provided for the protection of the landlord, by
what is vulgarly termed the “ iron-clad lease,” which contains a warrant of attorney
to confess judgment in ejectment, without stay of execution, in case of any violation
of its covenants. A provision in a lease, authorizing any attorney to appear for the
lessee, and confess judgment in ejectment, is a sufficient warrant.’ But a warrant of
attorney, contained in a lease, only extends to rent accruing during the term. And
where there has been a continuous breach of a covenant for the punctual payment
of rent, the lessor cannot insist upon a forfeiture, without previous notice of his
intention to exact a strict performance.
V. PROCEEDINGS IN CASE OF A FRAUDULENT REMOVAL OF GOODS.
Another wrongful act frequently perpetrated by tenants, is the fraudulent removal
of their goods from the demised premises, before the rent becomes due, with intent
to deprive the Jandlord of his remedy by distress. For this a remedy is provided
by the act 25th March 1825; the provisions of which, however, are restricted in
their operation to the cities of Philadelphia, Pittsburgh and Allegheny. That
act provides, that in case any lessee for life or lives, term of years, at will, or
otherwise, of any messuages, lands or tenements, situate in the (cities) of Phila-
19 Penn. St. 213. 93 Ibid. 255. T6N. Y. 140.
2°75 Ibid. 341, 76 Ibid. 277. Thecomplaint 8 4 Phila. 31.
must set forth all the facts necessary to give juris- 9 8 Leg. & Ins. R. 205. As to the recognisance
diction. 43 Leg. Int. 4. on appeal, and the liability of the surety, see 10
8 2 Phila. 370. W. 393, 22 Penn. St. 33.
410 W. 395. 10 25 Penn. St. 350.
5 L Ash, 230. 15 Phila, 324. ;
6 4 Phila. 149, See 3 Ibid. 278. 1 W.N.C. 12 39 Leg. Int. 356. .
314, 18-11 W.N. C. 450,
LANDLORD AND TENANT. 637
delphia (Pittsburgh or Allegheny),’ upon the demise whereof any rents are or
shall be reserved and made payable, shall, * * * before such rents as afore-
said shall become due and payable, fraudulently convey away or carry off from
such demised premises, his goods and chattels, with intent to defraud the land-
lord or lessor of his remedy by distress, it shall and may be lawful to and for
such landlord or lessee, to consider his rent so reserved as aforesaid, as appor-
tioned up to the time of such conveying away or carrying off, and for him, or
any other person or persons by him for that purpose lawfully authorized,
within the space of thirty days next ensuing such conveying away or carrying off
such goods and chattels as aforesaid, to take and seize such guods and chattels,
wherever the same may be found, as a distress for such rents so apportioned as
aforesaid, and the same to sell or otherwise dispose of, in such manner as if the
said goods and chattels had been distrained by such lessor or landlord, in and upon
such demised premises for rents actually due, agreeable to the existing laws:
Provided, That such landlord or lessor, before any such goods or chattels are seized
as aforesaid, shall make oath or affirmation before some judge, alderman or justice
of the peace, that he verily believes that said goods or chattels were carried’ away
for the purpose of defrauding as aforesaid: And provided, That nothing herein
contained shall extend, or be deemed or construed to extend, to empower such
lessor or landlord to take or seize any goods or chattels, as a distress tor such rents
so apportioned as aforesaid, which shall be bond fide, and for a valuable considera-
tion, sold, before such seizing made, to any person or persons not privy to such
fraud as aforesaid, anything herein to the contrary notwithstanding.”
If any lessee for a term of years, in the city (of Philadelphia) aforesaid, shall
remove from such demised premises, without leaving sufficient property thereon to
secure the payment of at least three months’ rent, or shall refuse to give security
for the payment thereof, in five days after demand of the same, and shall refuse to
deliver up possession of such premises, it shall and may be lawful for the landlord
or lessor to apply to any two (magistrates), within the city of Philadelphia, and
make an affidavit or affirmation of the facts, and thereupon the said (magistrates)
shall forthwith issue their precept to any constable of the (said) city * * commanding
him to summon such lessee before such (magistrates), on a day certain, not exceeding
eight, nor less than five days, to answer such complaint; and the said (magistrates)
shall, on the day appointed, proceed to hear the case, and if it shall appear that
the lessee has removed from the premises without leaving sufficient goods and
chattels, or giving security for the payment of the rent as aforesaid, and has
refused to deliver up possession of the demised premises, they shall enter judgment
against such lessee, that said premises shall be delivered up to the lessor or land-
lord forthwith ; and shall, on the request of the said lessor or landlord, issue a writ
of possession, directed to the said constable, commanding him forthwith to deliver
possession of the premises to the landlord or lessor, aud also to levy the costs on
the defendant, in the same manner that executions issued by justices of the peace
are directed by law.®
It would seem, that the provisions of the first section of this act, as to the nature
and effect of the oath or affirmation of the landlord or lessor, are not so well and
generally understood as it is desirable they should be. By many, it is supposed
that the complaint of the landlord, betore the magistrate, can be made the subject
of denial or examination, and also that it is necessary the magistrate shall issue
’ process, upon the complaint so made, to entitle the landlord tv levy on the goods
removed. Neither of these positions is correct. The test is the cunscience of the
complainant, and the duty of the magistrate is ministerial ; he is merely to admin-
ister the oath, and if the oath be made in obedience to the requirements of the law,
whether true or not, is not to be inquired into by the magistrate. He attests it as
made, and hands the affidavit to the party making it, and therein his magisterial
duty ends.
No process is issued by the landlord; the complainant, in this case, proceeds,
issues his warrant, and seizes, as if upon a distress tor rent actually due, which dis-
a
1 The provisions of this Ist section areextended 2 Act 25 March 1825 31. Purd. 1161.
to Pittsburgh and Allegheny, by act 29 March 3 Ibid. 2 2. Purd. 1169.
1870. Purd. 1161.
638 LANDLORD AND TENANT.
tress, at common law, must be made upon the premises. The oath which the land-
lord has made, is the justification of himself or agent in making the seizure, and
the truth or falsehood of the matter complained of, under oath, cannot in any man-
ner, in this proceeding, be made the subject of investigation.
If the tenant has been wronged, he has his right of action against the wrongdoer
for damages; and in that action, all irregularities, untruths or oppressions can be
made the legitimate objects of investigation.
But while the act gives to landlords a beneficial protection, unknown to the com-
mon law, it protects carefully the rights of third persons, and declares that if, at
any time, before actual seizure by the landlord, even after the fraudulent removal
by the tenant, the goods shall have been, bon@ fide, and for a valuable considera-
tion, sold to any person not privy to the fraud, then the innocent purchaser shall
be entitled to retain the goods unembarrassed by any seizure of the landlord. The
justice and policy of such a provision and limitation are manifest; there is more
reason that the landlord should be watchful, and immediately follow the goods, than
that a stranger should be put to make inquiries, and thereby give birth to suspicions
of fraud, contrary to the maxim of law, that “ everything is presumed to be rightly
done until the contrary is shown.”
The second section of the same act is meant to remedy another evil somewhat
similar to that provided against in the first section. If a tenant remove from the
premises during the term of demise, and at the same time retain possession, it seems
but justice that the landlord should have some security that his rent, when due.
shall be paid. The ordinary security of the law, the remedy by distress, he is here
deprived of, and therefore it is, that the legislature adopted the provisions of the
second section.
The notice required by the second section must be given by the landlord or his
agent; proceedings cannot be had under this act by an adverse claimant of the
premises.’ The landlord’s affidavit must set forth the demise ;? and the record
must show that the tenant was a lessee for a term of years ;° the proceedings must
show a compliance with the essential requirements of the law.* A tender of security
after the expiration of the five days, is too late. A sub-tenant has a right to tender
security for the rent, and the original lessee cannot waive that right to his pre-
judice.®
CoMPLAINT UNDER THE act oF 1825.
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ss.
On the ninth day of May, a. p. 1880, personally appeared [A. B.] before the sub-
scriber,one of the magistrates in and for the said city, who being duly sworn [or affirmed],
doth depose and say, that he demised the premises situated in the said city, in [Walnut
street, No, 356], [by the quarter], to a certain [C. D.], who has removed therefrom ; that
there are not goods enough on the premises to pay a quarter’s rent; that he refuses to
give up possession or security for three months’ rent, the same having been demanded
more than five days previous to the date of this deposition.
(Signed) A. B.
Sworn and subscribed, May 9th, a. p. 1880, before G. H., Magistrate.
PRECEPT UNDER THE ACT oF 1825,
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ss.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To any Constable of the said city, greeting :
Wuerzas, complaint on oath hath been made before [G. H.], one of our magistrates
of said city, by [A. B.], that on the [third] day of roy , in the year 1879, he demised
a tenement situated in said city, in [ alnut street, No. 356], [by the quarter], to [C. D.],
who has removed therefrom; that there are not goods enough on the premises to pay a
quarter’s rent; and that the said [C. D.] refuses to give up possession or security
for three months’ rent, the same having been demanded five days previous to the
date hereof. You are, therefore, commanded to summon the said [C. D.] to be and
1 2 Phila. 42. i 4 6 Ibid. 132. 8 Ibid. 300.
« 2 Ibid. 41. 5 10 Penn. St. 98.
8 1 Ibid. 17. 6 6 Phila. 112.
LANDLORD AND TENANT, 689
appear before our said magistrate, at the office of [G. H:, No. 20 North Fourth street],
on the [fourteenth] day of [May], a. p. 1880, between the hours of [four and five] o’clock,
p. u. to answer the complaint of said [A. B.]. In witness whereof, the said magistrate
hath hitherto set his hand and seal, the [ninth] day of [May], a. p. 1880, at Philadelphia
aforesaid. @: H., Magistrate. [szax.]
WRIT OF POSSESSION UNDER THE ACT oF 1845,
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ss.
The Oommonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To any Constable of the said city, greeting:
Wuereas, proof hath been made, on oath, before [G. H.], one of our magistrates of
said city, that [A. B.] demised to [C. D.] a tenement situate in said city [Walnut street,
No. 366], by the quarter ; that there is not sufficient property on said premises to pay a
quarter’s rent; and that said {C. D.] has removed therefrom, and neglected and refused
to give security for the payment of three months’ rent, the same having been demanded
the space of five days, agreeable to law; and also has refused to deliver up possession of
said premises ; and whereon the said magistrate, in consideration of the premises, did
enter judgment againstsaid lessee, that said premises should be delivered up to the lessor
forthwith. Therefore we command you forthwith to deliver to the said [A. B.] full pos-
session of the demised premises aforesaid. And we also command you that you levy the
costs of the goods and chattels of the said [A.B.]. And of your proceedings herein make
return to our said magistrate, on or before the 8th of August, a. p. 1880. In witness
whereof, the said magistrate hath hereunto set his hand and seal, the [twentieth] day of
[July, a. p. 1880], at Philadelphia aforesaid.
G. H., Magistrate. [smau.]
Docket-ENTRY UNDER THE act oF 1825.
A, B. LaNDLORD AND TENANT CasE, before Magistrate G. H. May 9th, 1880,
v plaintiff appears and makes complaint, on oath, that he demised the pre-
C. D. mises situate No. 356 Walnut street, in the said city, by the quarter, to the
defendant, who has removed therefrom ; that there are not sufficient goods
on the premises to pay a quarter’s rent; and that the defendant refuses to
give up possession, or security for three months’ rent, which the plaintiff has demanded
more than five days previously. Same day, summons issued, returnable the 14th inst.,
at4to5 p.m. 8. 8., constable, returned on oath, “ served on defendant, by exhibiting to
him the original summons, and informing him of the contents thereof.” May 14th, 1880,
parties appear. X. Y. sworn for plaintiff. After hearing, the said magistrate finds that
the above complaint is in all respects just and true, and enters judgment against the
defendant, that he shall forthwith deliver up possession of the said premises to the plain-
tiff. Same day, writ of possession issued. S.S., constable: returned, “‘ possession given
to plaintiff.”
These observations embrace all the provisions of the different acts of assembly
of Pennsylvania, and exhibit the various alterations and additions which have been
engrafted by our legislatures upon the common law. The common law gives to the
landlord the right, when any rent is in arrear, to levy the same by sale of any
goods found upon the premises, and which he is authorized to seize. This is a
tight known and practised, and which is not at all encroached upon by the acts of
re the provisions of which seem in aid and furtherance of this remedy by
istress,
VI. OF THE WRIT OF CERTIORARI IN LANDLORD AND TENANT OASES.
Except in the city of Philadelphia, the writ of certiorari is not a supersedeas in
proceedings between landlord and tenant2 But it has been provided by act of 24th
March 1865,3 that in every proceeding or suit brought, in the city of Philadelphia,
under any of the several acts of this commonwealth, by landlords, to recover posses-
1 See tit. “ Distress for Rent.” Ins. R. 59.
276 Binn. 460. 81 Penn. St. 217. 3 Leg. & 8 Purd. 1169.
640 LANDLORD AND TENANT.
sion of property leased for a term of years, or from year. to year, in which a certio-
rari is now allowed, the said certiorari’ shall be a supersedeas ; and the execution
upon the judgment in the said suit or proceeding shall be suspended until the final
determination of the certiorari by the court out of which the same issues ; and the
said court, if the said determination shall be made adversely to the party at whose
instance the writ of certiorart has issued, shall proceed to issue a writ of possession,
directed to the sheriff of the county of Philadelphia, directing him to deliver actual
possession of the premises to the lessor; and also to levy the costs on the defend-
ant, in the same manner that costs are now by law levied and collected on other
writs of execution: Provided, That the said certiorari shall be issued within ten
days from the date of the judgment rendered in said proceedings, and upon oath of
the party applying for the same, to be administered by the prothonotary of the
court of common pleas, that it is not for the purpose of delay, but that the proceed-
ings proposed to be removed are, to the best of his knowledge and belief, unjust and
illegal, and will oblige him to pay more money than is justly due ; a copy of which
affidavit shall be filed in the prothonotary’s office: And provided further, That the
party applying for the same shall give security for the payment of all costs that
have accrued or may accrue, and of the rent which has already or may become due
up to the time of the final determination of said certiorar?, in the event of the same
being determined against him.
This act only extends to cases in which the writ of certiorari is allowed by
statute, that is to proceedings under the acts of 1830 and 1868 ; it does not embrace
cases in which the writ issues at common law; such as those issuing under the act
of 1772; and to proceedings by a purchaser at sheriff’s sale, under the act of
1836.7
No writ of possession can be issued, until the expiration of the ten days allowed
for a certiorart.® But unless the recognisance be given in the form prescribed, the
certiorari will be quashed. The bail is liable for the rent, until the final deter-
mination of the cause, or the plaintiff obtains possession; and he is entitled to
subrogation against bail in error, where the case has been taken to the supreme
court, and the judgment there affirmed.> If the tenant remove, during the pen-
dency of proceedings under the act of 1830, without notice to his landlord, he
continues liable for the rent until their termination ;° and so, it would seem, does
the bail.
VIL. OF THE RIGHTS OF THE LANDLORD WHERE THE TENANT’S GOODS ARE SEIZED
IN EXECUTION.
The goods and chattels being in or upon any messuage, lands or tenements,
which are or shall be demised for life, or years, or otherwise, taken by virtue of an
exécution, and liable to the distress of the landlord, shall be liable for the payment
of any sums of money due for rent at the time of taking such goods in execution:
Provided, That such rent shall not exceed one year’s rent.’
After the sale by the officer of any goods or chattels, as aforesaid, he shall first
pay out of the proceeds of such sale, the rent so due, and the surplus thereof,
if any, he shall apply towards satisfying the judgment mentioned in such execution ;
Provided, That if the proceeds of the sale shall not be sufficient to pay the land-
lord and the costs of the execution, the landlord shall be entitled to receive the
proceeds, after deducting so much for costs as he would be liable to pay in case of
a sale under distress.
Whenever any goods and chattels, liable to the payment of rent, as aforesaid,
shall be seized in execution, the proceedings upon such execution shall not be stayed
181 Penn. St. 217. 10 Phila. 88, 43 Leg. Int. T Act 16 June 1836 % 83. Purd. 842. In the
36. 17 W. N.C. 477, counties of Carbon, Dauphin, Northumberland,
2 6 Phila. 307, Schuylkill, Somerset and Washington, the land-
8 Ibid. 38, lord’s lion is restricted to one month’s rent, and
4 Ibid. 39. any fraction of a month’s rent, by act 30 March
6 7 Ibid. 214. 1859. Purd, 843.
6 4 Ibid. 31. § Act 16 June 1836 3 84. Purd. 843,
LANDLORD AND TENANT. 641
by the plaintiff therein, without the consent of the person entitled to such rent, in
writing, first had and obtained.
These provisions are intended to make amends to the landlord for taking away
his power of distress, by a judicial sale of the tenant’s goods; but the act contem-
plates an existing tenancy at the time of sale; if there be no tenancy, there can be
no right to distrain, and, consequently, no equivalent for it under this act; thus, a
surrender of the tenancy, after levy, but elite sale, on an execution, deprives the
landlord of his claim for rent out of the proceeds.? So will a sheriff’s sale of
the landlord’s interest in the land ;* or the death of the tenant before the right
of distress accrued.* And if the landlord had previously distrained the property,
and it had been replevied by the tenant, he can only claim such rent as accrued
subsequently to the distress? If a lease so mix the real and personal property
together that it cannot be determined how much of what is called the rent is to
be paid for the chattels, and how much is the profit of the land, there can be no
distress for non-payment of it.® But wherever the landlord has power to distrain,
he is entitled to be paid out of the proceeds of sale ;’ his right continues to exist
so long as he retains the title. If, however, he had not the power to distrain at
the time of the levy, he can acquire no rights, as against the sheriff, by a subsequent
change of relation with the defendant in the execution.®
An execution levied by a constable is within the act ; although preceded by an
attachment, under the act of 1842.% Rent due to the immediate landlord of the
defendant is alone protected ;” ground-rent is not within the act.¥ But rent due
to a lessor by his lessee, is payable out of the proceeds of the goods of a sub-
tenant,1*
The rent is to be apportioned to the date of the levy, but the landlord is not
entitled to claim to the time of sale. And where, by the terms of the lease, the
_ taxes are to be paid by the tenant, the landlord cannot claim out of the proceeds
any part of the sum due for taxes.* Where there is a sale under two levies made
at different times, the landlord can claim for rent down to the date of the last levy ;”
but he is only entitled to rent to the date of that execution which exhausts the
property.
The landlord is not confined, in his claim for rent, to the current year, so that
no more than one year’s rent be received.” He is entitled to claim for rent pay-
able in advance ;° but where rent is payable in advance, and that for the curreat
quarter has been paid, the landlord cannot claim out of the proceeds of an execu-
tion an amount of rent proportioned to the part of the quarter which had expired.”
The landlord is bound to give notice of his claim for rent, before the return of
the execution.” It may be given at any time before the sheriff pays over the money
to the execution-creditor.* The sheriff is bound to keep the proceeds a reasonable
time to enable the landlord to make his claim; a payment to the execution-cred-
itor on the day after the sale, and ten days before the return-day, is too soon, and
will render the sheriff liable to the landlord.* But, the landlord must give notice
of his claim, whilst the property, or its avails, are within the control of the skeriff.*
The practice is, to take a rule on the sheriff to pay the amount of rent due, out
of the proceeds.” 3
The preference given to rent over costs, is confined to the costs of the execution,
and does not extend to those of the sheriff for executing it.” The landlord’s claim
T Act 16 June 1836 3 85. Purd. 843. Penn. St. 390. 15 Ibid. 80. 1 Clark 316. 3
25 Penn. St. 422. 21 Ibid. 274. 7 Phila. 89. Luz. L. Obs. 393.
3 2 Clark 489. 4 Phila. 438. 16 5 Binn. 506. 185. & R. 158, 15 Penn. St. 80.
42 Clark 489. Thid. 224. 17 1 Phila. 398. :
54 W.39. See l W.& 8.416. 4 Ibid. 344. 184 W.N.C. 347. 5 Ibid. 221.
‘66 Penn. St. 470. 19 5 W.140. 4 Penn. St. 471. 5 Ibid. 390. 63
6 18 Penn. St. 447. Ibid. 302. See 58 Ibid. 501.
7 35 Ibid. 162. 58 Ibid. 501. 20 35 Penn, St. 83.
8 66 Ibid. 312, s 21 23 Ibid. 97.
§ 21 Ibid. 274. 22138. &R. 295. 1 Ash, 184.
1 12 Ibid. 379. 23 5 W. 134.
16 W. & S. 333. 24 2 Phila. 115.
12 14 Penn. St. 400. 25 92 Penn. St. 258.
B9W. &S. 180. 26 2 Y. 274.
14 43 Penn. St. 435. See 44 Ibid. 477. 27 1M. 269. And see 104 Penn. St. 37%.
5 Binn, 506. 2 ¥.274. 6 W.& S. 335. 5
41
642 LANDLORD AND TENANT.
is superior to that of the defendant’s assignee in bankruptcy.1 But the wages of
laborers are entitled to a preference over his claim for rent.’
If the landlord claim the goods levied on as his own personal property, he cannot
subsequently be allowed a year’s rent out of the proceeds of the sale.* But the
acceptance of a note for the amount of rent due, does not preclude him from claim.
ing out of the proceeds of a sheriff’s sale of the tenant’s goods.* ;
If the sheriff return the writ “stayed” by order of the plaintiff’s attorney, with-
out the landlord’s consent, he makes himself liable for the rent.°
VIII. RigHts oF A PURCHASER AT A SHERIFF'S SALE OF THE LANDLORD’S
INTEREST IN THE PREMISES.
If any lands or tenements shall be sold upon execution as aforesaid, which, at
the time of such sale, or afterwards, shall be held or possessed by a tenant or lessee,
or person holding or claiming to hold the same, under the defendant in such execu-
tion, the purchaser of such lands or tenements shall, upon receiving a deed for the
game, as aforesaid, be deemed the landlord of such tenant, lessee or other person,
and shall have the like remedies to recover any rents or sums accruing subse-
quently to the acknowledgment of a deed to him, as aforesaid, whether such accruing
rent may have been paid in advance or uot, if paid after the rendition of the judg-
ment on which sale was made, as such defendant might have had, if no such sale
had been made.®
If, after notice shall be given of such sale, as aforesaid, such tenant, lessee or other
person, shall pay any rent or sum accruing subsequently to the acknowledgment of
such deed, (and) notice given him, as aforesaid, to such defendant; such tenant,
lessee or other person so paying, shall nevertheless be liable to pay the purchaser.’
It is at the purchaser’s option, either to disaffirm the lease, or to affirm it, and
avail himself of the rights of the former owner to recover the rent. If he choose
to disaffirm it, which he does by giving the defendant notice to quit, he cannot
claim anything under the terms of the lease. And in such case, the relation of
landlord and tenant cannot be renewed by the tenant’s remaining in possession, or any
act short of a mutual contract for a new lease.’° The lessee becomes a tenant at
will of the sheriff’s vendee, and as such, is entitled to the way-going crop ;"! but
he does not become such tenant at will, until after notice of the purchaser’s election
to determine the tenancy.” ,
If, by the terms of the lease, the rent was payable in advance at the beginning
of the year, a purchaser at sheriff’s sale in the middle of the year, is not entitled to
it.’ But where a lease contains a stipulation for a rent in kind, without specifica-
tion of the day of payment, it is payable at the expiration of the year; and an
assignment of the rent, by an order on the tenant, accepted by him, will not pass
the right to it, as against a purchaser at sheriff’s sale, under a judgment prior
to the lease.“ The purchaser is not entitled to rent accruing between the day of sale,
and the acknowledgment of the sheriff’s deed.®> Wherever the owner could maintain
an action for use and occupation the purchaser of his title can do the same.’®
176 Penn. St. 50. 64 Penn. St. 58. 12 Phila, 518.
2 Purd. 2077. 12 Phila. 387. 04 W. & S. 535.
313 W. N.C. 111. 105 Penn. St. 103. 11 29 Penn. St. 66.
4 3 Pitts. 287. 12 53 Ibid. 81.
5 16 W. N.C. 499. 18 9 W. 436. 12 Penn. St. 220.
6 Act 16 June 1836 3 119. Purd. 860. 144 Penn. St. 140. 5 W. & 5.432. 3 W. 400.
T Thid, 2 120. And see 3 W.401. 10 Ibid. 362. 37 Penn. St.
85 WwW. & S. 432, 134.
99 W. 436. But he may recover for use and 16 43 Penn. St. 342.
occupation, during the time the tenant holdsover. 6 51 Ibid. 261. And see 64 Ibid, 58.
[ 643 ]
Larceny and Receibing Stolen Goods.
I. Provisions of the Penal Code. II. Judicial decisions and authorities.
I, PRovVISIONS OF THE PENAL CODE.
Ir any person shall be guilty of larceny, he shall, on conviction, be deemed guilty
of felony, and be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars, and to
undergo an imprisonment, by separate or solitary confinement, at labor, not exceeding
three years.’
If any person shall steal any bank-bill, note, draft or check, of, or on any bank,
or any bill of exchange, order, warrant, draft, bill or promissory note, for the
payment of money, or any certificate or security whatsoever, entitling or evidencing
the title of any person or body corporate, to any share, portion or interest in any
public debt or security, or fund, either of this commonwealth, or of the United
States, or of any of the states thereof, or of any foreign state, or to any interest
in any stock, fund or debt of any body corporate, company or society, or to any
deposit in any saving-bank or sompany, being the property of another person,
or any corporation, association or society, notwithstanding the said enumerated par-
ticulars are, or may be deemed in law, choses in action, such person shall be deemed
guilty of larceny, and punished as is provided in the preceding section. And
any person who shall steal any letters-patent, charter, testament, will or deed,
whether indented or poll, covenant, assurance, lease, indenture, contract, letter of
attorney, or other’ power or instrument of writing, respecting any property, real
or personal, or any release, acquittance, voucher, receipt, receipt-book, letter-book,
waste-book, day-book, journal, ledger or other book of accounts belonging to another,
every person so offending shall, on conviction, be adjudged guilty of larceny, and be
sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars, or to undergo an im-
prisonment, by separate or solitary confinement, not exceeding two years, or either,
or both, at the discretion of the court.’
If any person shall be guilty of horse-stealing, or as accessory thereto before
the fact, or of having received or bought any horse, knowing the same to have
been stolen, the person so offending shall be guily of felony, and shall, on convic-
tion, be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars, and to undergo
an imprisonment, by separate or solitary confinement, at labor, not exceeding ten
years.$
If any person shall steal or rip, cut or break, with intent to steal, any glass or
wood work belonging to any building whatsoever, or any lead, iron, copper, brass
or other metal, or any utensil or fixture, whether made of metal, or other material,
respectively fixed in or to any building whatsoever, or anything made of metal fixed
in any land, being private property, or for a fence to any dwelling-house, garden or
area, or in any square, street or other place dedicated to public use or ornament,
every such offender shall be deemed guilty of larceny, and, being thereof convicted,
shall be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars, and undergo an
imprisonment, by separate or solitary confinement, at labor, not exceeding three
years.*
If any clerk, servant or other person in the employ of another, shall, by virtue
of such employment, receive and take into his possession any chattel, money or
valuable security, which is or may be made the subject of larceny, for or in the
name, or on account of his master or employer, and shall fraudulently embezzle
the same, or any part thereof, every such offender shall be deemed to have feloniously
stolen the same from his master or employer, although such chattel, money or
security was not received into the possession of such master or employer, otherwise
1 Act 31 March 1860 2 103, Purd. 515. 3 Ibid. 2 105.
7 Thid. 2 104. * Tbid. 3 106.
644 ‘LARCENY AND RECEIVING.
than by the actual possession of his clerk, servant or other person in his employ,
and shall be punished as is provided in cases of larceny of like property.’
If any person, being a bailee of any property, shall fraudulently take or convert
the same to his own use, or to the use of any other person, except the owner thereof,
although he shall not break bulk or otherwise determine the bailment, he shall be
guilty of larceny, and punished as is provided in cases of larceny of like property.?
If any person shall buy or receive any goods, chattels, moneys or securities, or
any other matter or thing, the stealing of which is made larceny by any law of this
commonwealth, knowing the same to be stolen or feloniously taken, such person
shall be guilty of felony, and, on conviction, suffer the like pains and penalties
which are by law imposed upon the person who shall have actually stolen or felon-
iously carried away the same.®
It may and shall be lawful to prosecute and punish all buyers and receivers, as
well before as after the principal felon shall be taken and convicted, and whether
he be amenable to justice or otherwise ; which prosecution, conviction and sentence
of said receivers shall exempt them from being prosecuted as accessories after the
fact, in case the principal felon shall be afterwards convicted.*
On all convictions for robbery, burglary or larceny of any goods, chattels or other
property, made the subject of larceny by the laws of this commonwealth, or for
otherwise unlawfully and fraudulently taking or obtaining the same, or of receiving
such goods, chattels or other property, knowing the same to be stolen, the de-
fendant shall, in addition to the punishment heretofore prescribed for such offences,
be adjudged to restore to the owner the property taken, or to pay the value of the
same, or so much thereof as may not be restored. And on all convictions on any
indictment for forgery, for uttering, publishing or passing any forged or counterfeit
coin, bank-notes, check or writing, or any indictment for fraudulently, by means of
false tokens or pretences, or otherwise, cheating and defrauding another of his
goods, chattels or other property, the defendant, in addition to the punishment
hereinbefore prescribed for such offences, shall be adjudged to make similar restitu-
tion, or other compensation, as in case of larceny, to the person defrauded: Pro-
vided, That nothing herein shall be so construed as to prevent the party aggrieved,
and to whom restitution is to be awarded, from being a competent witness on the
trial of the offender.
If any person shall, in the daytime, break and enter any dwelling-house, shop,
warehouse, store, mill, barn, stable, out-house or other building, or wilfully and
maliciously, either by day or by night, with or without breaking, enter the same,
with intent to commit any felony whatever therein, the person so offending shall be
guilty of felony, and, on conviction, be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding five
hundred dollars, and to undergo an imprisonment, by separate or solitary confine-
ment, at labor, not exceeding four years.®
II. Larceny is ‘the felonious taking and carrying away of the personal goods
of another.” The taking and carrying away are felonious, where the goods are
taken against the will of the owner, either in his absence or in a clandestine man-
ner, or where possession is obtained either by force or surprise, or by any trick,
device or fraudulent expedient, the owner not voluntarily parting with his entire
interest in the goods, and when the taker intends, in any such case, fraudulently to
deprive the owner of his entire interest in the property, against his will.
The least removing of the thing taken from the place where it was before, though
it be not quite carried off, is a sufficient taking and carrying away to constitute lar-
ceny; and upon this ground, a guest who had taken the sheets from his bed, withan
intent to steal them, and carried them into the hall, where he was apprehended,
was adjudged guilty of larceny. So, where a person takes a horse in a close, with
1 Act 31 March 160 3107. Purd. 516. by fine not exceeding $500, or imprisonment not
2 Thid. 2 108. exceeding one year or both or either, at the
STbid. 2109. Purd. 535. By acts 11 April discretion of the court. Purd. 536.
1866, 24 April 1869, 24 May 1871, and 3 April * Act 31 March 1860 3110. Purd. 536.
1872, the receiving or buying, from minors, un- 5 Ibid. 2179. Purd. 562.
known or irresponsible persons, of any scrap- § Act 22 April 1863 2. Purd. 482.
iron, brass, lead, copper, or other metal, in the 74 Bl. Com, 229.
counties of Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, 81 Hale H. P. C.c.1, b. 35, 3 25. 3 Inst. 108
Lancaster, Lebanon, Montour, Philadelphia or 2 Hast P, C. 355. 1 Leach C. 0, 323.
Schuylkill, is made a misdemeanor, puni” ~~
LARCENY AND RECEIVING. 645
intent to steal him, and is apprehended before he can get him out of the close.t
The prisoner got into a wagon, and taking a parcel of goods which lay in the fore-
part, had removed it to near the tail of the wagon, when he was apprehended.
The twelve judges were of opinion, unanimously, that as the prisoner had removed
the property from the spot where it was originally placed, with an intent to steal,
it was a sufficient taking and carrying away to constitute the offence.?
According to the common law, personal goods only were the subjects of larceny ;
nothing, therefore, which was annexed or adhering to the land could be made the sub-
ject thereof. Thus, if a person cut down trees, plucked fruit, pulled down the stones
or bricks of a building or the fixtures of a house, and instantly carried them away,
he could not be convicted of stealing, because the property was part and parcel of the
freehold ; but if once severed and allowed to lie on the ground for some period of
time, before being carried away, they then become personal goods, and the subse-
quent wrongfully carrying them away was larceny. So strict was the law relating to
land, or realty (as it is called in the law), that it was held, that larceny could not
be committed of the title-deeds to the land, or the box in which they were contained.
So, written documents, such as bonds, bills of exchange, promissory notes, &c., were
not, as such, the subjects of larceny, on the supposed ground that, as they are mere
evidences of debt, they were of no intrinsic value. In our large cities, thefts of
the fixtures of dwelling-houses are a great evil; such houses, when vacant, ara
entered by depredators, who not only injure the owner by taking away his gas or
water fixtures, but subject him to loss and injury, consequent upon the flowing of
the gas or water. This defect in the common law has been remedied by the 106th
section of the Penal Code.®
By the common law, it is not larceny in a servant or other employee to convert
to his own use property received by him for the use of his master or employer,
which has never otherwise been in the possession of such master or employer, and
where such servant or employee has done no act to determine his original lawful
and exclusive possession, as by depositing the goods in the master’s house or the
like. Thus, a cashier of the Bank of England had received in deposit certain
East India bonds, which he did not carry to the usual place of deposit, but put
them in his own desk, from whence he afterwards took and sold them; this was
held not to be larceny, because the bank had never actual possession of the bonds,
but the possession remained always in the prisoner.* So, where a confectioner,
suspecting a person in his employ of purloining money received at the counter, sent
an individual, who made a purchase from the servant, and paid him with a marked
piece of silver; the master immediately afterwards examined the till, and not find-
ing the marked piece, caused the servant to be searched, and found it on his person ;
the servant was acquitted of larceny, on the ground that the money never had been
in the possession of the master, as against the prisoner.» And where a banker’s
clerk receiving a deposit in bank-notes from a customer, part of which, instead of
placing in the drawer, he kept, and appropriated to his own use; this, after much
discussion, was ultimately held by nine of the twelve judges not to be felony, inas-
much as the note kept back never had been in the possession of the banker, distinct
from the possession of the prisoner; but that it would have been otherwise, if the
prisoner had deposited it in the drawer and had taken it afterwards? In neither
of these cases did there exist any moral difference between the crimes of which the
prisoners were actually guilty, and technical larcenies ; a nice and highly artificial
distinction between what was, and what was not, a sufficient possession in the mas-
ter of the property purloined, enabled the offenders to escape with impunity. It is
to obviate such results, which are really discreditable to criminal justice, and to
protect masters and employers from the want of fidelity of those in whom they
are compelled, from the exigencies of business, to confide, that the 107th section
of the Code was passed.’ . :
_ By the common law, if a carrier was intrusted with the transportation of a package
of goods or other property, and appropriated the whole to his own use, he was not
3 Inst. 109. 5 2 Leach OC. C. 980.
1 Leach C. C. 236. 2 Hast P. C. 356. 6 Ibid. 973.
Report on the Penal Code 28. 7 Report on the Penal Code 29.
1 Leach C. C. 33.
RO
646 LARCENY AND RECEIVING.
criminally liable ; but if he opened the package, and withdrew a portion of its con-
tents, he was guilty of larceny. This distinction proceeded upon the ground, that
the act of breaking the package was an act of trespass in the carrier, by which the
privity of contract was determined ; whereas, if there were no breaking of the pack-
age, no severance of part of the commodity from the rest by the carrier, but the
whole were parted with by him in the state in which it was delivered into his
hands, there was nothing which would amount to a trespass while the package
remained in his possession. This has been remedied by the 108th section of the
Code.*
A bona fide finder of a lost article is not guilty of larceny, by any subsequent
appropriation of it? But if he knows the owner, or has reason to believe who is
the owner, and subsequently converts the same to his own use, he is guilty of lar-
ceny. In such case, however, the finder must know the owner, or have the means
of identifying him énstanter, at the time of finding.*
At common Jaw, larceny cannot be committed of a dog ;> but this is altered by the
act of 25 May 1893. So, bees are fer nature, and although confined in the top of a
tree, by the owner of the tree, yet while they remain in the tree, and are not secured
in a hive, they are not the subject of a felony.’
The conductor of a railroad train is an employee, within the meaning of § 107
of the penal code; and may be convicted of larceny, if he embezzle moneys
received by him in such capacity.® So is a broker, who misappropriates the pro-
ceeds of a check intrusted to him for a special purpose.?
A bailee, under § 108, is any one intrusted with the possession of property for a
time; it is not confined to the case of a carrier? But a horse-dealer, to whom a
horse is delivered for sale, is not a bailee within the meaning of the law. A man
cannot be convicted of the larceny of bis own goods from his bailee.”
The offence of receiving stolen goods is not complete, until on actual delivery to
the prisoner. Where A. and B. brought stolen goods to C. for sale, C. knowing
them to be stolen, and the parties were arrested whilst in the act of bargaining
for the sale of the goods, it was held, that there was no such receiving on the part
of C. proved, as would warrant his conviction.“
In Pennsylvania, it is the settled practice, on the trial of an indictment for
receiving stolen goods, knowing them to have been stolen, in order to prove the
guilty knowledge, to admit evidence, that the prisoner had in his possession at
the same time, other stolen goods belonging to a different owner ; provided the fact
of receiving is not so far removed, in point of time or circumstances, as to constitute
‘a totally distinct transaction® But, in general, evidence is not admissible in a
‘criminal prosecution of the perpetration by the defendant of a crime other than
that on trial, unless such a connection is shown between the two offences as tends
oe that if the defendant were guilty of the one, he was also guilty of the
other.”
1 Report on the Penal Code 30. 9 29 Leg. Int. 60.
2 14 Johns. 294. 10 50 Penn. St. 181. See 82 Ibid. 472.
3] Park. 2. ll 2 Pitts. 495.
* 1 Hill 94, 12 2 Brewst. 570.
588. &R.571. 18 3 Ibid. 342.
6 Purd. 692. 14 2 Cox C. C. 412.
7 3 Binn. 646. 15 89 Penn. St. 480. 14 Phila. 663: 8 Ibid. 61).
8 2 Pears. 432, 18 104 Penn. St. 218. See 106 Ibid. 477.
[ 647]
Law Forms, Ke.
OR A SYSTEM OF POPULAR CONVEYANCING;
EMBRACING
ARTICLES OF AGREEMENT.
ARTICLES OF COPARTNERSHIP.
DEEDS AND LEASES.
DOWER, AND RELEASE OF DOWER,
WILLS.
POWERS OF ATTORNEY.
PETITIONS FOR ROADS, BRIDGES, ETC.
PROCEEDINGS, REPORT OF VIEWERS.
PROMISSORY NOTES.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS AND PROOFS OF DEEDS.
BONDS AND MORTGAGES.
BILLS OF SALE.
DUE-BILLS, RECEIPTS, ETC,
And such other Forms as are most frequently required selected from the best authorities,
and of the most approved kind.
1, Definition of an affidavit.
2. Affidavit to an account.
38, Affidavit to the account of an executor, guar-
dian or trustee.
4, General form of articles of agreement.
5, Agreement for the purchase of a reversion
after a lease of years.
6, Covenants which may be inserted.
Not to commit waste, or grant new
leases.
If counsel do not approve title, &c.
Not to be responsible for the arrears of
former tenants,
7. Agreement for making a quantity of shoes.
8 Agreement to bear equal charges in a law-
suit to be brought for the recovery of an
estate.
9. Agreement between several to pay their pro-
portion of expenses of defending a law-
suit expected to be brought against them
for the recovery of lands.
10. General form of articles of copartnership.
11. Additional articles which may be inserted,
or rejected, as parties may agree.
Not to trust any one whom the copart-
ner shall forbid.
Not to release any debt, without consent.
Not to be bound, or indorse bills.
Neither party to assign his interest.
Parties to draw quarterly.
Principal clerk to receive, &c.
The voice of the majority of partners
shall bind the whole.
12. Agreement to continue copartnership, by
indorsement.
13. Dissolution of partnership.
14. Notice of dissolution.
15. Certificate of limited partnership.
16. Notice of limited partnership.
17. General form of assignment.
18. Assignment.
19. A general form of assignment by indorsement
on the back of any instrument, whether
agreement, bond, bill of sale, &c.
20. Assignment of moneys due upon account.
21. Assignment of a note to a creditor, in satis-
faction of his debt; but if more than the
debt be received, the note being for more,
the surplus to be returned to the assignor.
22, Bill of sale of chattels.
23. Common form of bill of sale.
. Definition of a bond.
25. Common form of bond and warrant.
26. Bond to indemnify one who indorsed a pro-
missory note for another.
Bond to save harmless from paying rent,
where the title is in question.
. Condition of a bond for paying an annuity
during life.
. Refunding bond.
. To indemnify against a bastard child.
- Bonds, how to be assigned.
. Assignment of bond, by indorsement.
. Short form of the same.
. Short form of assignment of a bond, where
the assignor is liable.
. do. where the assignor is not liable.
Definition of deeds.
. Common form of a deed,
. Ground-rent deed.
. Grant of right of way.
. Grantee covenants to keep the way in repair.
- Dower.
. Release of dower.
. Definition of a lease.
. Common form of lease.
. Lease made Fy tenants in common.
. Lessor covenants to sell the inheritance to
the lessee, on request.
Special form, with authority in certain cases
to enter judgment in ejectment,
. Assignment of a lease.
. Short ferm of do.
. Letters of attorney.
. General form of letter of attorney.
. General letter of substitution.
. To receive money on 2 bond.
. To receive dividends on stock.
. To convey lands.
. To acknowledge a deed.
. To acknowledge satisfaction on a mortgage.
. To lease lands for terms not exceeding
twenty years.
. Revocation of a letter of attorney.
27.
648 LAW FORMS.
60. Powers of attorney to attorneys at law. 77. Petition for annuling proceedings had, be-
Power of attorney by defendant. fore the road is opened.
“ ss by plaintiff to institute 78. Report of viewers. :
suit. 49. Petition to vacate a state road supplied by
“ “or
by plaintiff to conduct
a turnpike.
suit already brought. 80. Petition for a review. :
61. Liens. 81. Petition for a road on county line,
62. Form of mechanics’ lien. 82. Report thereon.
63. Mortgage, definition of. 83. Petition for county bridge.
. Report thereon.
Form of a mortgage. .
. Petition for bridge on county line.
65. Assignment of a mortgage,
66. Roads. 86. Due-bill. cs
67. Petition for a public road. 87. Promissory notes, various forms,
68. Order of court thereon. 88. Receipts of different kinds, ==
69. Return of jury. 89. Last will and testament, definition of, and
70. Petition for damages, who may make. -
71. Order of court thereon. 90. Forms of wills and testaments.
72, Petition for private road. 91. Preambles to wills. ‘ c
73. Petition for gates on a private road. 92. Will, &c., appointing guardians for chil-
74, Petition for vacating a road. dren. e
75. Report of viewers. 93. Will ordering estates to be appraised and
76. Order of court. divided.
1. AN AFFIDAVIT
Is an oath in writing, sworn before some judge, or officer of a court, or other
person who hath authority to administer such oaths, to evince the truth of certain
facts therein contained.
2. AFFIDAVIT TO AN ACCOUNT.
CITY OF HARRISBURG, ss.
A. B. personally appears before the subscriber, one of the aldermen of the said city,
and being duly sworn e affirmed] doth depose and say, that the above and foregoing
account has been faithfully made out from the books of original entries of C. D.; which
original entries were made by this deponent, at the time the goods therein charged were
sold and delivered to E. F., which sale and delivery was made by this deponent; and
deponent further saith, that the prices charged for the said goods are the prices for which
they were sold, and which the said E. F., at the time agreed to pay; and that the said
account is in all particulars just and oe and the credits given to the said E. F. are,
to the best of deponent’s knowledge and belief, all the credits to which the said E. F. is
entitled ; and ae truly believes that the balance stated, viz., $412.25, is justly due
from the said E. F. to the said C. D. (Signed) A. B.
Sworn and subscribed July 4th, 1880, before G. H., Alderman.
3. AFFIDAVIT TO THE ACCOUNT OF AN EXECUTOR, GUARDIAN OR TRUSTEE.
CITY OF HARRISBURG, ss.
A. B., the above-named accountant, being duly sworn [or affirmed] doth depose and
say, that the foregoing account, as the same is above stated, is just and true, both as to
the items of charge and discharge therein contained, to the best of his knowledge and
belief. (Signed) A. B.
Sworn and subscribed, this 5th day of July 1880, before G. H., Alderman.
4, A GENERAL FORM OF AN AGREEMENT.
ARTICLE OF AGREEMENT made the —— day of ——, in the year of our Lord one thou-
sand eight hundred and —, between A. B., of the city of Philadelphia, machinist, of the
one part, and C. D., of the county of Montgomery, farmer, of the other part: Witnesseth,
that the said A. B., for the consideration hereinafter mentioned, hath agreed, and hereby
doth for himself, his heirs, executors and administrators, covenant and agree, to and with
the said C. D., his heirs and assigns, that he, the said A. B., will, on or before the ——
day of ——, a. p. 1880, at the proper cost and charges of the said A. B, [or C. D.] by good
and lawful conveyance and assurance, grant, convey and assure unto the said ©. D., his
heirs and assigns, in fee-simple, with general (or special) warranty, all that messuage,
&c. (here describe the property). In consideration whereof, the said C. D., for himself,
his heirs, executors and administrators, doth hereby covenant and agree, to and with the
said A. B., his heirs and assigns, that he, the said ©. D., will, on the execution and delivery
of the conveyance and assurance as aforesaid, well and truly pay, or cause to be paid,
unto the said A. B., his executors, administrators or assigns, the sum of dollars, in
manner following [seiting out the mode of payment],
LAW FORMS, 649
[Insert, if desired.] ‘To the true and faithful performance of the several covenants
and agreements aforesaid, the parties aforesaid do hereby respectively bind themselves
their heirs, executors and administrators, each to the other, his executors, administrators
and assigns, in the penal sum of dollars.” In witness whereof, the said parties have
hereunto set their hands and seals, A.B. [szan.
Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of us, Cc. D. lores
G. H. and I. J.
5, AGREEMENT FOR THE PURCHASE OF A REVERSION AFTER A LEASE FOR YEARS.
Aut that, &e., — situated, &c., ——, now in the tenure or occupation of E. F., which
he holds by lease from the said A. B. (determinable on the —— day of —, &e., A. D.
——), and the reversion or reversions and remainders of all and singular the said premises
and every part and parcel thereof, and all the rent or rents and other profits arising there-
from ; and, also, all the estate, right, title, interest, inheritance, expectancy, use, property,
claim and demand whatsoever of him the said A. B., of, in and to the said premises and
any part thereof, &c.
6. Covenants, &e., WHICH MAY BE INSERTED, NOT TO COMMIT WASTE OR GRANT NEW LEASES,
Tuar the said A. B. shall not, and will not, in the meantime, cut down any timber or
trees, or commit any waste or spoil whatsoever in or upon the premises, or any part
thereof, nor shall or will grant any new leases of the premises, or any part thereof, with-
out the privity or consent of the said C. D. or his heirs or assigns.’’
Tf counsel do not approve title, de.
“ Anp it is ot that if the counsel of the said C. D. shall not approve of the title
of the said A. B. to the said premises, this agreement shall be void.”
Not responsible for the arrears of former tenant.
“ Anp itis agreed between the said parties, that the said C. D. shall be let into posses-
sion of the premises on or before the day of next ; but that all arrears of rent
and other profits arising from the said premises, which shall at that time be due and pay-
able, shall belong to the said A. B., his heirs or assigns, and that he shall have full liberty
to receive the same.”
7. AN AGREEMENT FOR MAKING A QUANTITY OF SHOES.
Artictzs, &c., between A. B., of, &c., of the one part, and C. D., &c., of the other part.
The said A. B., for the consideration hereinafter mentioned, doth covenant that he will,
at his own charge, make for the said C. D. 1000 pairs of men’s shoes, of the same quality
of leather and goodness as, and in all other respects according to, a pattern agreed
between the said parties, and of a size from 10 to 13, and deliver the same to the said C.
D., at ——, within months from the date hereof. And the said C. D., in considera-
tion thereof, doth covenant to pay to the said A. B. at the rate of —— per pair, after
months from the delivery of the said shoes as aforesaid. And it is agreed, that if any of
the said shoes shall not be made agreeable to the said pattern, and for that reason shall
be rejected by the said C. D., he, the said A. B., shall take back such as shall be so
refused, and deliver the said C. D. the like quantity of the goodness and make according
to the pattern aforesaid. In witness, &e.
[An agreement for any other work to be done, or services to be rendered, may be made
by writing a similar agreement, varying the kind and quantity of work to be done and
the nature of the services to be rendered. ] ,
8. AN AGREEMENT TO BEAR EQUAL CHARGES IN A LAWSUIT TO BE BROUGHT FOR THE
RECOVERY OF AN ESTATE,
Artictiss, &c., between, &c. Whereas [recite the grounds of the contemplated action
or actions], by reason whereof a suit or suits is, or are, to be commenced. And whereas,
it is agreed by the said parties, that every of them shall pay his share of the costs and
charges thereof. Now, these articles witness, that the said A. B., C. D., &c., and every
of them, covenant with each other, that they and every of them, their respective, &c.,
shall pay their respective equal shares of all the costs and damages of all and every such
action and actions as are, or at any time hereafter shall or may be, brought by or against
them, or any or either of them. In witness, &c.
650 LAW FORMS.
9, AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN SEVERAL TO PAY THEIR PROPORTION OF THE EXPENSES OF DEFEND-
ING A LAWSUIT EXPECTED TO BE BROUGHT AGAINST THEM FOR THE RECOVERY OF LANDS.
ARTICLES OF AGREEMENT between A. B., of, &c., of the first part, C. D., of, &c., of the
second part, D. E., of, &c., of the third part. Whereas, L. M. and N. O. are possessed
of a certain tract of land, situated in, &c., and pretend that the bounds thereof extend
upon scme of the respective lands of the said A. B., C. D. and E. F., by reason whereof
a suit is likely to be commenced. Now, the said A. B., C. D. and E. F., and every of
them, do hereby covenant with each other, that they, the said A. B., C. D., and E. F,,
and every of them, and their assigns respectively, shall and will pay their respective equal
shares of all costs and damages as shall arise by reason of any such suits as shall at any
time hereafter be brought against them, or any or either of them. In witness, &c.
10. GENERAL FORM OF ARTICEES OF COPARTNERSHIP.
ARTICLES OF AGREEMENT, made and concluded on the first day of January, in the year
of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and seventy-one, between A. B., of R , in the
county of Beaver and state of Pennsylvania, of the one part, and C. D., of the township
of A——, in the county and state aforesaid, of the other part.
The said parties have agreed, and by these presents do agree, to associate themselves in
the art and trade of buying, selling, vending and retailing all sorts of wares, goods and
commodities belonging to the trade or business of merchandise ; which said copartnership
shall continue from the date of these presents, for and during and to the full end and
term of ten years next ensuing.
And to that end and purpose, he, the said A. B., hath, the day of the date of these
presents, delivered in, as stock, the sum of one thousand dollars, and the said C. D. the
sum of one thousand dollars, to be used, laid out and employed in common, between them,
for the management of the said business, to their general advantage.
And it is hereby agreed between the said parties, each for himself, respectively, and for
his own particular part, and for his respective executors and administrators, doth cove-
rant, promise and agree, each with the other of them, his respective executors and admin-
istrators, in manner and form following, that is to say :—that they shall not, nor will not,
at avy time hereafter, use, exercise or follow the said trade or any other, during the said
term, to their private benefit and advantage ; but shall and will, from time to time, and
at all times, during the said term (if they shall so long live), do their best endeavors, to
the utmost of their skill and ability, for their mutual advantage, with the stock, as afore-
said, and the increase thereof.
And also that they shall and will, during the said term, discharge equally between
them the rent of the premises which they shall rent or hire for the managing of the trade
or business aforesaid :
And that all such profit, gain and increase as shall arise, by reason of the said joint
business, shall be equally and proportionably divided between them, share and share
alike. And also that all losses that shall happen in the said business, by bad debts, ill
commodities, or otherwise, shall be paid and borne equally between them.
And further, it is agreed between them, that there shall be kept, during the said term
and joint business, perfect, just and true books of accounts, wherein each of the said
copartners shall enter and set down, as well all the money by him received and expended,
in and about the said business, as also all commodities and merchandises by them bought
and sold by reason and on account of the said copartnership, and all other matters and
things in any wise belonging or appertaining thereto, so that either of them may, at any
time, have free access thereto.
And also that the said copartners, once in three months, or oftener if need shall require,
upon the request of any one of them, shall make and render each to the other, or to the
executors and administrators of each other, a true and perfect account of all profits and
increase by them made, and of all losses sustained ; and also of all payments, receipts,
disbursements, and all other things whatsoever, by them made, received and disbursed,
acted, done and suffered in the said copartnership; and the accounts so made shall and
will clear, adjust, pay and deliver, each unto the other, at the time of making such
account, their equal shares of the profits so made as aforesaid.
And at the end of the said term of ten years, or other sooner determination of these
presents (be it by the death of one of the said parties or otherwise), they, the said
copartners, each to the other, or in case of the death of either of them, the surviving
party to the executors or administrators of the party deceased, shall and will make a
true and final account of all things, as aforesaid, and in all things well and truly adjust
the same. And also that upon the making of such accounts, all and every the stock
and stocks, as well as the gains and increase thereof, which shall appear to be remaining,
shall be equally parted and divided between them, the said copartners, their executors or
administrators, share and share alike.
In witness whereof, the said parties to these presents have hereunto set their hands
and seals, the day and year above written. A.B. [span
Sealed and delivered in G. D. ieee
the presence of
E.F,G. H.
LAW FORMS. 651
11, ADDITIONAL ARTICLES WHICH MAY BE INSERTED OR REJECTED AS THE PARTIES MAP
AGREE.
Not to trust any one whom the copartner shall forbid.
Anp that neither of the said parties shall sell on credit any goods, wares or merchan-
dise, belonging to the said joint trade, to any person or persons, after notice in writing
from the other of the said parties, that such person or persons are not to be credited or
trusted.
Not to release any debt without consent.
Anp that neither of the said parties shall, without the consent of the other, release or
compound any debt or demand, due or coming to them, on account of their said copart-
nership, except for so much as shall be actually received and brought into the stock or
cash account of the said partnership.
Not to be bound or indorse bills.
Awp that neither of the said parties shall, during this copartnership, without the
consent of the other, enter into any deed, covenant, bond or judgment, or become
bound as bail or surety, or give any note, or accept or indorse any bill of exchange, for
himself and partner, with or for any person whatsoever, without the consent of the
other first had and obtained.
Neither party to assign his interest.
AND it is agreed between the said parties, that neither of them shall, without the con-
sent of the other, obtained in writing, sell or assign his share or interest in the said joint
trade, to any person or persons whatsoever. .
Parties to draw quarterly.
Tuat it shall be lawful for each of them to take out of the cash of the joint stock, the
sum of —— quarterly, to his own use, the same to be charged on account; and neither
of them shall take any further sum for his own separate use, without the consent of the
other, in writing. And any such further sum, taken with such consent, shall draw
interest after the rate of six per centum ; and shall be payable, together with the interest
due, within —— days, after notice in writing given by the other of the said parties.
Principal clerk to be receiver-general, &c.
Tart the principal clerk, for the time being, shall be the general receiver of all the
money belonging to the said joint trade, and shall thereout pay all demands ordered by
the said parties; and shall, from time to time, pay the surplus cash to such banker
ag the said partners shall nominate.
That the voice of the majority of the partners shall bind the whole.
Tuar in all matters respecting the general transactions of the partnership, and the
management of the business, the wish and opinion of any three (the number making a
majority) of the partners shall govern and be binding on the other partners.'
12, AN AGREEMENT TO CONTINUE A PARTNERSHIP BY INDORSEMENT.
Ws, the within-named A. B. and ©. D., do by these presents indorse, declare and mutu-
ally covenant and agree, unto and with each other, his and their executors and adminis-
trators, to continue the joint trade and partnership within mentioned, for the further
term of -—— years, if both of us shall so long live, to be accounted from the expiration
of the —— years within limited for the continuance of the same, with the joint stock,
and under and subject to the several covenants and agreements within expressed and
contained.
In witness, &c.
13. DissoLUTION OF PARTNERSHIP.
Wuerzas, by agreement made the first day of January, a. D. 1876, A. B. and C. D.
did enter into copartnership, for the purpose of carrying on the trade and business of
merchandising for the term of ten years. And whereas, the said C. D. wishing to dis-
continue and decline the joint partnership entered into as aforesaid, he, the said C. D.,
hath proposed to his said partner, A. B., a dissolution, to which proposition the said
A. B. hath assented. The parties, therefore, mutually consent and agree by these pre
1 As to Joint-Stock Companies, see ante, p. 556.
652 LAW FORMS
sents, that the partnership heretofore existing between them, be this day dissolved, and
it is accordingly dissolved. And it is further stipulated and agreed mutually between
them, that A. B. do take the entire stock of goods and merchandise now on hand,
belonging to the partnership, at a valuation to be set upon the same by three competent
persons, mutually appointed to value the same. And that he also have power to collect
the debts now dueto the partnership, and to recover all, and any, part of the same in the
name of the firm, by suits at law or otherwise. And that, finally, the said A. B. do pay
over to the said C. D., or his legal representatives, the full share and profits which shall
appear to be due to the said é D. in six months from the date hereof. Witness their
hands and seals the —— day of ——, Anno Domini 1878.
Sealed and delivered in A. B. ee |
the presence of } C.D. [seat.
E. F.,G. H.
14. Notice of DISSOLUTION.
Notice of dissolution should be published immediately after that event takes place,
in the public papers, and special notice sent to every correspondent, and every other
person who has had any dealings with the firm. If these precautions be neglected,
one partner may be held liable for the acts of another, by those who have not had
notice of a dissolution.
The following notices will answer the purpose :
Notice is hereby given, that the partnership lately subsisting between A. B. and C.D.,
of, &c., under the firm of B. & D., expired on the — day of ——; [or was dissolved on
the day of by mutual consent, according to circumstances]. All debts oe
to the said partnership are to be received by the said A. B., and all demands on the sai
partnership are to be presented to him for payment. [or, A. B. is authorized to settle all
debts due to and by the company. | a | '
.D.
Where one of the partners only leaves the firm, &c. :
Notice is hereby given, that the partnership between A. B., C. D.and E. F., was dis-
solved on the —— day of ——, so far as relates to the said E. ¥. All debts due to the
said partnership are to be paid, and those due from the same discharged at ——, where
the business will be continued by the said A. B. and C. D., under the firm of B. & D.
[The last words may be varied according to circumstances. |
15, CERTIFICATE OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP.
Limited Partnerships, for certain kinds of business, are allowed and regulated
- by the act of assembly of 21st March 1836.
THIs Is TO CERTIFY, to all to whom these presents shall come, that we whose names are
hereto subscribed, to wit, A. B., of , merchant, C. D., of , engineer, &c., have
entered into a limited partnership, for the business of mining and transporting of mineral
coal within the state of Pennsylvania, under and by virtue of an act of the general
assembly of the said commonwealth, passed the 21st March 1836, entitled “an act rela-
tive to limited partnerships,” and all and singular the supplements thereto, upon the
terms, conditions and liabilities hereinafter set forth, to wit:
1. The said partnership is to be conducted under the name or firm of A. B.
2. The general nature of the business intended to be transacted by the said firm or
partnership, is the mining of mineral coal and transporting the same, &c. (describing
the character of the projected business).
_ 8. The general partners in the said firm are A. B., residing in ——, E, F., residing
in Se ¢., and the special partners are C. D., residing in , G. H., residing in
. &e.
4. Hach of the special partners has contributed to the common stock of said firm the
amount of $——. GQ. H. has so contributed, &e.
_9. The said partnership is to commence immediately at and after the making and
signing of this certificate, and is to terminate on the —— day of ——, Anno Domini
rs
COUNTY OF 1 88.
Before me the subscriber, one of the justices of the peace in and for the said county,
personally came and appeared, on this —— day of , Anno Domini 18—, the above-
named A. B., C. D., &c., who severally, in due form of law, acknowledged the foregoing
certificate as and for their and each of their act and deed, to the end that the same might
as such be recorded. Witness my hand and seal, this —— day of ——, in the year of
our Lord, &e. X. Y. 4.. Justice of the Peace. [szat.]
LAW FORMS. 653
COUNTY OF —, ss. ,
Before me, the subscriber, one of the justices of the peace in and for the said county,
personally came and appeared, on this —— day of , A.D. 18—, A. B. aforenamed,
one of the general partners in the firm of ——, &c., referred to in the preceding certifi-
cate, and being duly sworn, did depose and say that the several sums specified in the
said certificate to have been contributed by each of the special partners therein named to
the common stock, to wit, the said C. D. the sum of —— dollars, &c., have been so con-
tributed and'actually and in good faith paid in cash. A.B.
J.&., Justice of the Peace. [szau.]
16. Novice oF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP.
We, the subscribers, have this day entered into a limited partnership, agreeable to the
provisions of the act of assembly of the commonwealth of Pennsylvania, passed the
twenty-first day of March 1836, entitled ‘an act relative to limited partnerships,” and
do hereby certify that the name of the firm under which said partnership is to be con-
ducted is A. B.; that the general nature of the business to be transacted is the mining
of mineral coal, and transporting the same, é&c. (describing the character of the projected
business) ; and the same will be transacted within the state of Pennsylvania; that the
names of the general partners of said firm are A. B., residing in ——, and E. F., residing
in ——; and the special partners are CO. D., residing in , and G. H., residing in
——-; that the capital contributed by each of the special partners, is —— dollars,
in cash ; that the period at which the said partnership is to commence is the —— day of
——, one thousand eight hundred and , and that it will terminate on the —— day
of ——, one thousand eight hundred and ——.
: B } General Partners.
. 2 j Special Partners.
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ss.
Before me, the subscriber, one of the magistrates in and for the said city, personally
came and appeared, on this —— day of ——, one thousand eight hundred and —,
J.B., printer of the “ Public Ledger,” and being duly sworn [or affirmed], did depose
and say that the preceding advertisement of the terms of the limited partnership between
the persons therein named, had been published in the “ Public Ledger,” a newspaper
published in said city, for the term of six weeks, next and immediately after the day of
the registry of the certificate. J. B.
Subseribed and sworn before me, the day and year aforesaid.
J. 1., Magistrate. [szat.]
17. ASSIGNMENT.
An assignment is the transferring and setting over to another of some right, title
or interest. An assignment in trust for the benefit of creditors must be recorded
within thirty days after date ; it must contain no reservation for the benefit of the
debtor, nor any preference in favor of a particular creditor or set of creditors.
18, A GENERAL ASSIGNMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF CREDITORS.
Tus INDENTURE, made the [tenth] day of [March], Anno Domini one thousand eight
hundred and [eighty], between [A. B., of the county of York, merchant], of the first
part, and [C. D., of the same place, blacksmith], of the second part. Whereas, the said
A. B.] is entitled to and possessed of certain estate, but owing to his misfortunes in
business is unable to pay his various creditors, but is desirous of distributing said estate
among them according to their several equities. Now this indenture witnesseth, that
the said [A. B.], as well for and in consideration of the premises, as of the sum of one
dollar to [him] in hand well and truly paid by the said y D.], at and before the seal-
ing and delivery of these presents, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, hath
‘| granted, bargained, sold, assigned, transferred and set over, and by these presents doth
grant, bargain, sell, assign, transfer and set over, unto the said [C. D.], his heirs, exe-
cutors, administrators and assigns, all the estate, real and personal, of him, the said
[A. B.], and all his rights, credits and expectancies, of whatsoever nature or kind, and
whether situate, lying and being due and owing in the state of Pennsylvania or else-
where: to have and to hold the same, with the appurtenances, unto the said [C. D.], his
heirs, executurs, administrators and assigns, to and for their only use and behoof for
ever. In trust, nevertheless, and to, for, and upon, the trusts, intents and purposes
hereinafter set forth, to wit, that the said party of the second part shall, by public or
!
654 . LAW FORMS.
private sale, at [his] discretion, and by collections, suits or compromises, likewise at [his]
discretion, convert all the assigned property, as speedily as may be, into cash, and as the
roceeds are, from time to time, realized (after paying all the ex enses of this trust,
including the cost of this instrument), pay the creditors of the said [ A. B.] their respect-
ive demands. And should any part or portion of said trust, property or fands remain,
after fully complying with the trusts aforesaid, then the said party of the second part
shall deliver over and reconvey the same unto the said [A. B.], his heirs, executors,
administrators and assigns. And the more effectually to enable the said party of the
second part to accomplish and perform the trust aforesaid, the said [A. B.] doth hereby
nominate, constitute and appoint the said party of the second part his true and lawful
attorney, for him, and in his name, to ask, demand, sue for, recover and receive all such
sum and sums of money, debts, goods, wares, dues, accounts and other demands whatso-
ever, which are now due and payable to him, or which are now due and may hereafter
become payable. Giving and granting unto his attorney, by these presents, his full and
entire power, strength and authority, in and about the premises, to have, use and take
all lawful ways and means, for the purposes aforesaid, and upon the receipt of any such
debts, dues and sums of money, acquittances and other sufficient discharges to make,
geal and deliver. In testimony whereof, the said parties have hereunto set their hands
and seals, the day and year first above written. A.B. [szau.]
Sealed and delivered in i
the presence of us,
W.G., H. L.
I accept the trust.—C. D.
CITY OF HARRISBURG, ss.
This [tenth] day of [March], a. p. [1880], personally appeared before me (one of
the aldermen of the city of Harrisburg), the within-named [A. B.], and acknowledged the
within-written indenture to be his act and deed, and desired that the same might be
recorded as such. In testimony whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal, the day
and year last above written. J. B., Alderman. [szat.]
19. A GENERAL FORM OF ASSIGNMENT, BY INDORSEMENT, ON THE BACK OF ANY INSTRUMENT,
WHETHER AGREEMENT, BOND, BILL OF SALE, &e.
Know Aut MEN by these presents, that I, the within-named A. B., in consideration of
five dollars to me paid by C. D., have assigned to the said C. D., and his assigns, all my
interest in the within-written instrument, and every clause, article or thing therein con-
tained : (this short power of attorney may be inserted where proper.) And I constitute the
said C. D. my attorney, in my name, but to his own use, to take all legal measures which
may be proper for the complete recovery and enjoyment of the assigned premises, with
power of substitution. Witness my hand and seal, this, &c.
20. OF MONEYS DUE UPON ACCOUNT.
Know aL. men by these presents, that I, A. B., of ——, in consideration of the sum
of ——, to me in hand paid by C. D., of ——, do hereby assign and set over unto the said
C. D., to his own proper use, without any account to be given for the same, the sum of
——, and all other sum and sums of money as are remaining due and payable upon,
or by virtue of the annexed account, and all my right, title, interest and demand in and to
the same: And do give and grant unto the said C. D., full power and authority to demand
and receive the same to his own use, and, upon receipt thereof, to give discharges for the
same or any part thereof: And I, the said A. B., do hereby covenant and agree to and
with the said C. D., the said sum of is justly due and owing, and that I have not
received or discharged the same or any part thereof. In witness, &c.
21. AN ASSIGNMENT OF A NOTE TO A CREDITOR, IN SATISFACTION OF HIS DEBT ; BUT IF MORE
THAN THE DEBT IS RECEIVED (THE NOTE BEING FOR MORE) THE SURPLUS TO BE RETURNED
TO THE ASSIGNOR.
AN InDENTURE, &c., between A. B., of —, of the one part, and O. D., of ——, of the
other part: Whereas, Kl. F., of, &¢., by his promissory note, under his hand, bearing date,
&c., did promise to pay to the said A. B., by the name of F. A. B., or order, the sum
of, &e., —— months after date, for value received, as by the same note may appear; and
whereas, the said sum of is still due and owing to the said A. B.: Now this indenture
witnesseth, that the said A. B., for and in consideration of the sum of one dollar, to
him in hand paid, &c., hath granted, &c., unto the said C. D., his, &c., the said note, and
all the money now due thereupon, with all interest accrued and growing due, or which shall
accrue, &c., thereupon ;, and all his the said A. B.'s right, &c.: to have, &., unto the said
C. D., his, &e., to the uses, intents and purposes following, to wit: it is covenanted,
granted and agreed, by and between the said parties to these presents, for themselves
respectively, and for their several and respective executors ‘and administrators, that out
LAW FORMS. 655
of the money to be recovered and received on the said note, the said C. D. shall and may
retain, in his own hands, the sum of —, which is now justly due and owing to him from
the said A. B., if he shall recover and receive so much as, &c. (the amount of the debt),
of the said note, &c.; and if he shall not recover so much as, &c., then it shall and may
be lawful for him to retain what sum he shall recover and receive less than, &e., in his
own hands, towards satisfaction and payment of the said sum of ——, so above mentioned
to be due from the said A. B. to the said C.D. And next after the said sum of —, so
due as aforesaid, shall be fully recovered and received by, and retained in the hands of,
the said C. D., it shall be lawful for, and it is agreed by and between the said A. B. and
C. D., that the said C. D. may retain in his hands the full charges and expenses which
he, the said C. D., shall have been put to, in the recovery or receiving the said sum of
—— (the amount due on the note), or such part thereof as he shall receive, and then
return to the aid A. B., his, &c., the residue of the said sum of ——, which he, the said
C. D., shall receive over and above the amount of the said sum of -—— 0 due to the
said C. D., and his charges as-above. [Add a letter of attorney and covenants that he has
not released nor will release the note, nor discharge any action
22, BILL OF SALE OF CHATTELS.
Possession is essential to a Hen upon corporeal chattels, Delivery may be made
in a very slight manner, as where one buys goods in a room, the receipt of the key
is sufficient. An agreement to sell an unfinished chattel, to be delivered at a future
time, does not pass a present property.
23. CoMMON FORM ON BILL OF SALE.
1
Know aut MEN by these presents, that I, A. B., of , merchant, for and in consid-
eration of the sum of —— dollars, to me in hand paid by C. D., of the same place, at
and before the ensealing and delivery of these presents, the receipt whereof is hereby
acknowledged, have bargained, sold and delivered, and by these presents do bargain, sell
and deliver, unto the said C. D. [here insert the goods sold]. To have and to hold the
said [goods] unto the said C. D., his executors, administrators and assigns, to his and
their own proper use, benefit and behoof for ever. And I, the said A. B., my heirs,
executors and administrators, the bargained premises, unto the said C. D., his executors,
andministrators and assigns, from and against all person and persons whomscever, shall
and will warrant and for ever defend by these presents. In witness whereof, &c.
24, DEFINITION OF A BOND.
A bond is a deed or obligatory instrument in writing, whereby one doth bind
himself and his heirs, executors and administrators, to another to pay a sum of
money, or to do some other act, as to make a release, surrender an estate for quiet
enjoyment, to stand to an award, save harmless, perform a will, or the like. It
contains an obligation with a penalty ; and a condition which expressly mentions
what money is to be paid or other things to be performed, and the limited time for
the performance thereof; for which the obligation is personally binding. A bond
may be executed with or without warrant to confess judgment.
25. CoMMON FORM OF A BOND AND WARRANT.
Know AuL MEN by these presents, that It, A.B., of the city of Philadelphia, merchant,
am] held and firmly bound unto [C. D., of the city of Philadelphia aforesaid, grocer], in
the sum of [. dollars], lawful money of the United States of America, to be paid
to the said i D., his] certain attorney, executors, administrators or assigns. To which
payment well and truly to be made [I bind myself, my] heirs, executors and administra-
tors, firmly by these presents. Sealed with [my] seal. Dated the —— day of ——, in
the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and eighty.
THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION 1s sucH, That if the above-bounden [A. B., his]
heirs, executors, administrators, or any of them, shall and do well and truly pay, or cause
to be paid, unto the above-named [C. D., his] certain attorney, executors, administrators
or assigns, the just sum of [. dollars, such as aforesaid, within one year from the date
hereof, with lawful interest for the same], without any fraud or further delay, then the
above obligation to be void, or else to be and remain in full force and virtue.
Sealed and delivered in the presence of, } A.B. [szan.]
EK. F. and G. H.
t
656 LAW FORMS.
To [E. E.], Esquire, attorney of the Court of Common Pleas at [Philadelphia], in the
county of [Philadelphia], in the state of [Pennsylvania], or to any other attorney of
the said court, or of any other court there or elsewhere. ;
Wueraas [I, A. B., of the city of Philadelphia, merchant], in and by a certain obliga-
tion bearing even date herewith, do stand bound unto [C. D., of the said city, grocer],
in the sum of [ dollars| lawful money of the United States of America, conditioned
for the payment of [—— dollars, such as aforesaid, within one year from the date
thereof, with lawful interest for the same]. These are to desire and authorize you, or any
of you, to appear for [me, my] heirs, executors or administrators, in the said court or
elsewhere, in an action of debt, there or elsewhere brought, or to be brought, against [me,
my] heirs, executors or administrators, at the suit of the said [C. D., his] executors,
administrators or assigns, on the said obligation, as of any term or time past, present, or
any other subsequent term or time, there or elsewhere to be held, and confess judgment
thereupon against [me, my] heirs, executors or administrators, for the sam of [—— dol-
lars], lawful money of the United States of America, debt, besides costs of suit, by non
sum informatus, nihil dicit, or otherwise, as to you shall seem meet ; and for your or any
of your so doing, this shall be your sufficient warrant. And [I] do hereby, for [myself,
my| heirs, executors and administrators, remise, release, and for ever quit claim unto the
said [C. D., his] certain attorney, executors, administrators and assigns, all and all manner
of error and errors, misprisions, misentries, defects and imperfections whatever in the
entering of the said judgment, or any process or proceedings thereon, or thereto, or
any wise touching or concerning the same. In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my
hand and seal, the —— day of ——, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred
and eighty. A.B. [seat]
Sealed and delivered in the presence of
E. F. and G. H.
Bonds should be so written and executed that the warrant can be detached from
the bond for the purpose of being filed in the proper office, when the obligee or
assignee of the bond desires to enter judgment against the obligor.
26. A BOND TO INDEMNIFY ONE WHO INDORSED A PROMISSORY NOTE FOR ANOTHER.
Know atu, &c. Whereas, the above-bounden A., by bill or note under his hand, dated
the, &c., hath promised to pay unto C., or order, six months after date, the sum of —,
with interest thereon till paid ; and whereas, the above-named B., at the request, and for
the only debt of the said A., hath indorsed the said recited bill or note, and is thereby
become chargeable with and for payment of the said sum of —— and interest, at the time
therein mentioned, as by the said bill and the indorsement thereupon may appear: Now
the condition, &c., that if the said A., his executors or administrators, do and shall well
and truly pay the said sum of , for which the said note is so given, and the interest
thereof, on the day of payment therein mentioned, and in full discharge thereof and
therefrom, and from all actions, suits, charges, payments and damages by reason thereof,
shall and do, at all times, well and sufficiently save harmless, and keep indemnified, the
said B., his heirs, executors and administrators, and every of them, then, &c.
27. A BOND TO SAVE HARMLESS FROM PAYING RENT WHERE THE TITLE IS IN QUESTION.
THE ConDITION, &c.: That whereas there is a suit depending between the above-bounden
R. C., and others, touching the right and interest in the now dwelling-house of the above-
named J. F., situate, &c.; and whereas, the said J. F. hath agreed to pay a rent of the
same house to the said R. C., which is, to pay the sum of —— yearly, as thé same shall
grow due: if, therefore, the said R. C., his, &c., do and shall well and truly pay, or eause
to be paid, unto the said J. F., his executors, administrators or assigns, all such rent, sum
and sums of money, charges and damages, whatsoever, as shall, by due proceedings in
law, be adjudged or decreed against him, the said J. F., his, &c., and all other costs and
damages whatsoever, which he, the said J. F., shall sustain, or be at, by reason of any
action, suit or forfeiture whatsoever, which shall or may happen, or be to the said J. F.,
his executors, administrators or assigns, by reason of paying the said rent, or any part
thereof, to the said R. C., his exeoutors, administrators or assigns, then, &c.
28. Te CONDITION OF A BOND FOR THE PAYMENT OF AN ANNUITY DURING LIFE.
Wuereas, the above-bounden T. T., on the day of the date of the above-written obli-
gation, hath had and received to his own use, of and from the above-named J. P., the sum
of ——, the receipt whereof he doth hereby acknowledge, in consideration whereof he,
the said T. T., hath agreed to pay unto the said J. P. one annuity, or clear yearly sum
of — during his natural life, to be paid in manner hereinafter mentioned: Now, the
condition of this obligation is such, that if the above-bounden J. P., his heirs, executors,
or administrators, or any of them, do and shall yearly, and every year, during the natural
life of the above-named J. P., well and truly pay, or cause to be paid, to him, the said
°
LAW FORMS. 657
J. P., or his assigns, the clear yearly sum of ——, lawful money, by quarterly payments, on
the days hereinafter limited and appointed therefor, that is to say, on the first day of,
&e., in each year, by even and equal portions, the first payment thereof to begin and be
made on ——, next ensuing the date of the above-written obligation ; then this obligation
shall be void and of no effect; but if default shall appear to be made of, or in, any of the
said quarterly payments, or any part thereof, on any or either of the said days on which
the same ought to be paid as aforesaid, then the same shall stand and remain in full force
and virtue.
29. REFUNDING BOND.
Know sl MEN by these presents, that we, A. B., of ——, legatee under the testament
and last will of R. 8., deceased, and C. D., of ——, are held and firmly bound unto §. F.
and G. H., executors of the said R. S., deceased, in the sum of ~-— dollars, to be paid to
the said E. F. and G. H., or to their certain attorney, executors, administrators or assigns,
to which payment well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves and each of us, by him-
self, for and in the whole, our heirs, executors and administrators, and every of them,
firmly by these presents. Sealed with our seals, and dated the ——, Whereas, the
said R. S., by his said last will and testament, bearing date the —— day of —— last
past did give and bequeath unto the said A. B., a certain legacy of —-— dollars [or one
equal —— part of his personal estate after the payment of his debts],! as by the said
in part recited will, duly proved and remaining in the register’s office at —— appears.
Now the condition of this obligation is such, that if any part or the whole of the said
legacy shall, at any time after payment thereof to the said A. B., appear to be wanting to
discharge any debt or debts, legacy or legacies, which the said executors shall not have
other assets.to pay, then and in such case if the said A. B., his heirs, executors and
administrators, shall and do return the said legacy or such part thereof as shall be neces-
sary for the payment of the said debts, or the payment of a proportional part of the said
legacies, then this obligation shall be void and of none effect, or else shall be and remain
in full force and virtue.
Distributees and legatees are required to give security, to be approved of by the
orphans’ court having jurisdiction, before they are entitled to their distributive
shares or legacies.
30. To THE COUNTY, FOR A BASTARD CHILD.
Know au MEN by these presents, that we, A. B. and F. G., of the township of B——,
in the county of Somerset, and state of Pennsylvania, are held and firmly bound unto
L. M. and N. O., overseers of the poor of the county aforesaid, for the time being, in the
just and full sum of three hundred dollars, lawful money of the United States, to be paid
to the said overseers of the poor, or to either of them, or either of their certain attorneys,
successors or assigns ; to which payment, well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves
jointly and severally, our heirs, executors and administrators, and every of them, firmly
by these presents. Sealed with our seals, and dated the —— day of ——, in the year, &e.
The condition of this obligation is such, that whereas M. W., of the township of T——,
in the county aforesaid, single woman, is now pregnant with child [or hath lately been
delivered of a male bastard child, in the township aforesaid], and hath charged the said
A. B. with being the father thereof. If therefore the said A. B. shall and do, from time
to time, and at all times hereafter, well and sufficiently save, defend, keep harmless and
indemnified, the said L. M. and N.O., and their successors, overseers of the poor of the
said county for the time being, and also all the inhabitants thereof, of and from all
expenses, costs, charges and damages whatsoever, which shall, or may hereafter happen or
accrue, for or by reason or means of the birth, maintenance education or bringing u
of the said child [or of such child or children wherewith the said M. W. now naeth f
and of and from all actions, suits, troubles and demands whatsoever, touching or concerning
the same, then this obligation to be void, or else to be and remain in full force and virtue.
31. BonDs, HOW TO BE ASSIGNED.
Bonds may be assigned; the assignment must be under seal, and in the presence
of two or more witnesses. The assignee may sue in his own name; and the assignor’s
power to release ceases after assignment. The assignee takes the bond subject to every
defalcation which the obligor had against the obligee at the time of the assignment,
or notice of the assignment. He should give notice of the assignment to the -
obligor.
A lapse of twenty years creates a presumption of payment, if no interest has been
paid in the mean time; but if the period be shorter than twenty years, the presump-
tion must be supported by circumstances.
1 Tn this latter case, the bond must be given in double the sum which the person shall thing him-
self entitled to.
658 LAW FORMS.
32, ASSIGNMENT OF A BOND BY INDORSEMENT.
Know aL MEN by these presents, that I, the within-named A. B., for and in con-
sideration of the sum of ——, to me in hand paid by C. D., of , at or before the
sealing of these presents, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, have granted, bar-
gained, sold, assigned, transferred and set over, and by these presents do grant, bargain,
sell, assign, transfer and set over, unto the said C. D., his executors, administrators or
assigns, the within-written bond or obligation, and the sum of —— mentioned in the con-
dition thereof, together with all interest due and to grow due for the same, and all my
right, title, interest, claim and demand whatsoever, of, in and to the same. And I author-
ize the said C. D. in my name to demand, sue for, receive, have, hold and enjoy the said
sum of —— and interest, to his own use absolutely for ever. In witness, &c.
A.B. |szat.]
33. A SHORT FORM FOR THE SAME.
I, A. B., do hereby assign and set over all my right, title, claim, interest, property and
demand whatsoever, in and to the within bond [or bill] unto C. D., for value received.
Witness my hand and seal, the —— day of ——. A.B. [sea.]
34, SHorT FORM WHERE THE ASSIGNOR IS LIABLE.
For vauve recetvep, I do assign and set over the within obligation, and all moneys
due thereon, unto A. B., his executors, administrators or assigns, hereby guareniying
the payment thereof, in case of default being made by the within-named C. D. Witness
my hand and seal, &c. 2
35. WHERE THE ASSIGNOR IS NOT LIABLE.
For VALUE RECEIVED, I do assign and set over the within obligation, and all moneys
due thereon, unto A. B., his executors, administrators or assigns, not holding myself
liable for the payment of the same; the losses, if any, and the recovery thereof, to be
wholly at the risk of the said A. B. Witness my hand and seal, &c.
[There must be two subscribing witnesses to either of the foregoing assignments, to-
authorize the assignee to bring suit in his own name; if the bond be not assigned in the:
preene of two subscribing witnesses, as prescribed by the act of assembly, suit must be
rought in the name of the original obligee, for the use of the assignee. ]
36. DEFINITION OF DEEDS.
A deed is an instrument in writing on parchment or paper, and under seal, con-
taining some conveyance, contract, bargain or agreement between the parties thereto;
and it consists of the following principal points, writing, signing, sealing and deliv-
ering. It should be recorded within six months. In Philadelphia, it only avails
from the time of record.
37. CoMMON FORM OF A DEED.
Tats {NDENTURE, made the --— day of , in the year of our Lord one thousand’
eight hundred and ——, between J. D., of the city of Philadelphia, grocer, and C., his
wife, of the one part, and H. F., of the said city, turner. of the other part, witnesseth,
that the said J. D., and C., his wife, for and in consideration of the sum of —— dollars,
lawful money of the United States of America, unto them well and truly paid by the-
said E. F., at and before the sealing and delivery of these presents, the receipt whereof
is hereby acknowledged, have granted, bargained, sold, aliened, enfeoffed, released and
confirmed, and by these presents do grant, bargain, sell, alien, enfeoff, release and con-
firm, unto the satd E. F., and to his heirs and assigns, all that certain two-story brick
messuage or tenement, and lot or piece of ground thereunto belonging, situate on the ——
side of —— street, in the said city of Philadelphia, beginning at the distance of —— feet.
from the —— side of -—— street, and extending thence —— in front or breadth on ——
street —— feet, and continuing of that breadth in length or depth ——— feet, bounded on
the —— by ground now or late of A. B., on the —— by a lot late of the said A. B.,
on the —— by a certain small’ lot, and on the —— by the said —— street; being the:
same premises which S, R., of the said city, grocer, and W., his wife, by indenture bearing
date the —— day of ——, Anno Domini one thousand eight hundred and , ins
tended to be recorded (or, recorded in the office for recording deeds, &c., for the city and
county of Philadelphia, in deed book ——, No. —, page —, &c., as the case may be),
granted and conveyed to the said J. D., in fee, subject to the payment of a yearly
rent-charge or sum of —— dollars, in half-yearly payments, without deduction for
taxes, &c., as by the said recited indenture fully appears; together with all and sim
LAW FORMS. 659
gular the improvements, ways, water-courses, rights, liberties, privileges, hereditament
and appurtenances whatsoever thereto belonging, or in anywise appertaining, and the
reversions and remainders. rents, issues and profits thereof, and all the estate, right,
title, interest, property, claim and demand whatsoever of them the said J. D., and W.,
his wife, in law, equity or otherwise howsoever, of, in and to the same and every part
thereof: To have and to hold the said two-story brick messuage or tenement, and lot of
ground above described, hereditaments and premises hereby granted, or mentioned and
intended so to be, with the appurtenances, unto the said E. F., his heirs and assigns, to
and for the only proper use and behoof of the said EK. F., his heirs and assigns for ever ;
under and subject to the payment of the aforesaid yearly rent-charge, or sum of ——
dollars, in half-yearly payments, as the same shall hereafter grow due and payable, clear
of taxes, &c. And the said J. D., for himself, his heirs, executors and administrators,
doth by these presents covenant and agree to and with the said E. F., his heirs and
assigns, that he, the said J. D., and his heirs, all and singular, the hereditaments and
premises hereby granted, with the appurtenances, unto the said E. F., his heirs and assigns,
against him the said J. D., and his heirs, and against all and every other person or per-
sons whomsoever lawfully claiming or to claim the same, by, from or under him, them
or any of them, shall and will, subject as aforesaid, warrant and for ever defend, by these
presents. In witness whereof, the said parties have hereunto interchangeably set their
hands and seals. Dated the day and year first above written.
38. GROUND-RENT DEED.
THIs INDENTURE, made the [sixth] day of [June], in the year of our Lord one thousand
eight hundred and [eighty] between [A. B., of the county of Bucks, state of Pennsyl-
vania, farmer], of the one part, and [C. D., of the county of Dauphin, of the same state,
tanner], of the other part, witnesseth, that the said [A. B.], as well for and in consideration
of the sum of one dollar, lawful money, unto [him], at or before the sealing and delivery
hereof, by the said [C. D.] well and truly paid, the receipt whereof is hereby acknow-
ledged, as of the payment of the yearly rent and taxes, and performance of the covenants
and agreements hereinafter mentioned, which, on the part of the said [C. D.], his heirs,
and assigns, is and are to be paid and performed, [have] granted, bargained, sold, aliened,,
enfeoffed, released and confirmed, and by these presents [do] grant, bargain, sell, alien,
enfeoff, release and confirm, unto the said [C. D.], all that certain lot or piece of ground
[here describe correctly the property]: Together with all and singular the [improve-
ments], ways, streets, alleys, passages, waters, water-courses, rights, liberties, privileges,
hereditaments and appurtenances whatsoever unto the said hereby-granted premises
belonging, or in anywise appertaining, and the reversions and remainders thereof: To
have and to hold the said described lot or piece of ground, hereditaments and premises,
hereby granted, with the appurtenances, unto the said [C. D.], his heirs and assigns, to
the only proper use and behoof of the said [C. D.], his heirs and assigns for ever: Yield-
ing and paying therefor and thereout, unto the said [A. B.], his heirs and assigns, the
early rent or sum of [twenty dollars], lawful money of the United States of America, in
Thal} yearly payments, on the [first] day of [January and July], in every year hereafter,
for ever, without any deduction, defalcation or abatement for any taxes, charges or
assessments whatsoever, to be assessed, as well on the said hereby-granted lot as on the
said yearly rent, hereby and thereout reserved ; the first [half] yearly payment thereof
to be made on the [first] day of [January], one thousand eight hundred and [eighty-one].
And on default of paying the said yearly rent, on the days and times and in manner
aforesaid, it shall and may be lawful for the said [A. B.], his heirs and assigns, to enter
into and upon the said hereby-granted premises, or any part thereof, and into the build-
ings thereon [erected or] to be erected, and to distrain for the said yearly rent so in
arrear and unpaid, and to proceed with and sell. such distrained goods and effects, accord-
ing to the usual course of distresses for rent-charges. But if sufficient distress cannot
be found upon the said hereby-granted premises, to satisfy the said yearly rent in arrear,
and the charges of levying the same, then and in such case, it shall and may be lawful
for the said (a. B.], his heirs and assigns, into and upon the said hereby-granted lot,
and all improvements, wholly to re-enter, and the same to have again, repossess and
enjoy, as in his and their first and former estate and title in the same, and as though
this indenture had never been made. And the said [C. D.], for himself, his heirs, ex-
ecutors, administrators and assigns, doth covenant, promise and agree, to and with the
aaid [A. B.|, his heirs and assigns, by these presents, that he, the said [C. D.], his heirs
and assigns, shall and will well and truly pay, or cause to be paid to the said (A. B.],
his heirs and assigns, the aforesaid yearly rent, or sum of [twenty dollars], lawful money
aforesaid, on the days and times hereinbefore mentioned and appointed for payment
thereof, without any deduction, defalcation or abatement for any taxes, charges or assess-
ments whatsoever ; it being the express agreement of the said parties, that the said
[C. D.], his heirs and assigns, shall pay all taxes whatsoever, that shall hereafter be laid,
levied or assessed, by virtue of any laws whatever, as well on the said hereby-granted lot
660 LAW FORMS.
and buildings thereon [erected or] to be erected, as on the said yearly rent now charged
thereon. Also, that the said [C. D.], his heirs or assigns, shall and will, within [two
years] from the date hereof, erect and build on the said hereby-granted lot {a good
three-story brick-house], of sufficient value to secure the said yearly rent hereby reserved.
And further the said [C. D.] doth hereby, for himself, his heirs, executors, administra-
tors and assigns, expressly waive, relinquish and dispense unto the said [A. B.], his
heirs, executors, administrators and assigns, all and every provisions and provision in
the act of assembly of the commonwealth of Pennsylvania, passed on the ninth day of
April, a. p. 1849, entitled “an act to exempt property to the value of three hundred
dolJars from levy and sale on execution and distress for rent,” so far as the same may
exempt the said hereby-granted lot, and any part thereof, from levy and sale, by virtue
of any writ of execution that may be issued upon any judgment that may be obtained or
entered in any action for the recovery of the rent hereby reserved, or hereby covenanted
to be paid, and of any arrears thereof, and of the costs of such action and execution ; so
that it shall be lawful for the said [A. B.], his heirs, executors, administrators or assigns,
to proceed by execution, to levy upon and sell the said hereby-granted lot of ground, and
every part thereof, with the buildings and improvements as aforesaid, in the same manner
and to the same extent, and to the same effect, to all intents and purposes, as if the
said act of assembly had not been passed]. Provided always, nevertheless, that if the said
[C. D.], his heirs or assigns, shall and do at any time, pay or cause to be paid to the
said [A. B.], his heirs or assigns, the sum of four hundred dollars], lawful money as
aforesaid, and the arrearages of the said yearly rent, to the time of such payment, then
the same shall for ever thereafter cease and be extinguished, and the covenant for pay-
ment thereof shall become void; and then he, the said [A. B.], his heirs or assigns,
shall and will, at the proper costs and charges in the law of the said grantee, [his] heirs
or assigns, seal and execute a sufficient release and discharge of the said yearly rent,
hereby reserved to the said [A. B.], his heirs and assigns, for ever, anything hereinbefore
contained to the contrary thereof notwithstanding. And the said i B.]|, for himself,
his heirs, executors and administrators, doth covenant, promise and agree, to and with
the said [C. D.], his heirs and assigns, by these presents, that he, the said [C. D.], his
heirs and assigns, paying the said yearly rent, or extinguishing the same, and taxes, and
performing the covenants and agreements aforesaid, shall and may, at all times hereafter
for ever, freely. peaceably and quietly, have, hold and enjoy, all and singular the premises
hereby granted, with the appurtenances, and receive and take the rents and profits thereof,
without any molestation, interruption or eviction, of [him] the said [A. B.], or his heirs,
or of any other person or persons whomsoever, lawfully claiming or to claim, by, from
or under [him], them or any of them, or by or with [his], their or any of their act,
means, consent or procurement. In witness whereof, the said parties have interchange-
ably set their hands and seals hereunto. Dated the day and year first above written.
Sealed and delivered in the presence of us, A.B. [sEa..
. G. H. C.D. [szan.
39. GRANT OF A RIGHT OF WAY.
THIS INDENTURE, made, &c., between A. B., of, &c. [the grantor], of the one part, and
C. D., of, &c. [the grantee], of the other part, witnesseth, that in consideration of $——
paid to the said A. B. by the said C. D., the receipt whereof is acknowledged by these
presents, the said A. B., for himself, his heirs and assigns, covenants and grants, with
and to the said C. D., his heirs and assigns, that it shall be lawful for the said C. D.,
his heirs and assigns, and their agents and servants, and the tenants and occupiers
for the time being, of the messuage and farm of the said C. D., called, &c., hereinafter
mentioned, and all and every other person and persons for his and their respective
benefit and advantage, from time to time, and at all times for ever hereafter, at his
and their respective will and pleasure, by night and by day, and for all purposes, to
go, return, pass and repass, with horses, carts, wagons and other carriages, laden or
unladen, and also to drive cattle and other beasts on, through, along and over a certain
road or way, lately formed and fenced off by the said A. B., out of, and from and inter-
secting certain closes or fields, called, &¢, ——, in M——, in the county of , belong-
ing to him, the said A. B.; and which said road or way is the width of fourteen feet or
thereabouts, and leads from the turnpike-road or public highway, opposite or adjacent to
the said messuage and farm of the said C. D., called, &c., in the town of —— aforesaid,
unto and towards a certain road or lane communicating with the farm and lands of the said
C. D., called, &e., in the town of ——, in the same county, of, &c., which same road or
way, the right or liberty of passing over which is hereby. granted, and the course and
direction thereof, are more particularly described in a map or plan indorsed on these pre-
sents; and that it shall be lawful for the said C. D., his heirs and assigns, to make and
lay causeways, or otherwise to repair and amend the samo as there shall be occasion.
LAW FORMS. 661
40, GRANTEE COVENANTS TO KEEP THE WAY IN REPAIR, &c.
Anp the said C. D., for himself, his heirs and assigns, hereby covenants with the said
A. B., his heirs and assigns, that he, the said C. D., his heirs and assigns, will, from time
to time, and at all times hereafter, at his or their own cost and expense, repair and
amend, and keep repaired and amended, in a proper, substantial and workmanlike man-
ner, the said road or way, the right of passing in and over which is hereby granted, and
also the gate erected by the said A. B. across the said road, at the northern end or extre-
mity thereof, and the lock and fastening belonging thereto, and will, from time to time,
and at all times hereafter, at the like cost and expense of the said C. D., his heirs or
assigns, repair and renew the quickset hedge and fence lately planted by the said A. B. on
both sides of the said road or way ; and also that he, the said C. D., his heirs or assigr.s,
and his and their agents and servants, and the tenants and occupiers for the time being
of the said messuage and farm called, &c., using the said road or way, will, from time to
time, and at all times, immediately after he or they shall have used and passed through
the said gate, shut out and lock the same. In witness, &c.
41, DEFINITION OF DOWER.
Dower is the widow’s right in an estate of inheritance of her husband, after his
death. It consists of one-third part of all the lands and tenements whereof the
husband was seised at any time during the coverture, to hold to herself for the term
of her natural life. The widow’s share of an intestate’s estate is in lieu of dower.
A devise or bequest, by a husband to his wife, of any portion of his estate or
property, is in lieu and bar of her dower. But she may elect to take her dower in
his real estate, and her share of his personalty under the intestate laws. The widow
is compelled to accept such devise or bequest in lieu of dower, or to waive such
devise or bequest and take her dower.
42, RELEASE OF DOWER.
To au to whom these presents shall come, A., of, &c., relict of B., late, &c., sends, greet-
ing: Know ye, that the said A., as well for and in consideration of the sam of —— to her
in hand, at or before the sealing and delivering of these presents, by her son A. B., of,
&c., well and truly paid, the receipt whereof the said A. doth hereby acknowledge, and
thereof doth acquit and discharge the said A. B., his heirs, executors and assigns, for
ever; and for the love and affection she hath to her said son. and for other good causes
and considerations, her thereunto especially moving, she, the said A., hath granted,
remised, released and for ever quit-claimed, and by these presents doth fully and abso-
lutely grant, remise, release and for ever quit-claim, unto the said A. B., his heirs and
assigns, for ever, all the dower and thirds, right and title of dower and thirds, and all
other right, title, interest, claim and demand whatsoever, in law and equity, of her, the
said A., of, in, and to [a certain parcel of land, &c., with the parcels, and how it descended
to A. and B.], so that neither she, the said A., her heirs, executors or administrators, nor
any other person or persons for her, them or any of them shall have, claim, challenge or
demand, or pretend to have, claim, challenge or demand, any dower or thirds, or any
other right, title, claim or demand, of, in or to the said premises, but thereof and there-
from shall be utterly debarred and excluded for ever by these presents.
In witness, &c. (Signed) A.B. [szat.]
D. E., G. H.
43, DEFINITION OF A LEASE.
A lease is a conveyance of any lands or tenements (usually in consideration of
rent or other annual recompense) made for life, years or at will, but always for a
less time than the lessor hath in the premises. Leases for a time exceeding three
years, unless put in writing and signed by the parties, have the force and effect of
leases at will only. A lease for a determinative period of time is a lease from year
to year so long as both parties please. Covenants to repair, pay rent, &e., run with
the land. He who lets is called the landlord or the dessor ; he who takes the pre-
mises is called the tenant or the lessee.
44. ComMoNn FORM OF A LEASE.
THIs INDENTURE, made the ——~ day of ——, between H. P., ——, of —, tailor, of
the one part, and J.C., of , tinner, of the other part, witnesseth : That the said HP,
for and in consideration of the yearly rent and covenants hereinafter mentioned, and
reserved on the part and behalf of the said J. C., his executors, administrators and assigns,
to be paid, kept and performed, hath demised, set and to farm let, and by these presents
662 LAW FORMS.
doth demise, set and to farm let, unto the said J. C., his executors, administrators and
assigns, all that messuage and tract of land situate, &c., together with all and singular
the buildings, improvements, rights, members and appurtenances whatsoever thereunto
belonging or in any wise appertaining, and the reversions and remainders, rents, issues
and profits thereof: to have and to hold the said messuage and tract of land, and all and
singular the premises hereby demised, with the appurtenances, unto the said J. C., his
executors, administrators and assigns, from the day of = , next ensuing the date
hereof, for and during the term of ——— years thence next ensuing, and fully to be com-
plete and ended; yielding and paying for the same unto the said H. P., his executors,
administrators and assigns, the yearly rent or sum of dollars, in four quarterly pay-
ments of dollars each, on the first day of April, first day of July, first day of October
and first day of January, in each and every year. And the said J. C., for himself, his
heirs, executors and administrators, doth covenant, promise and agree to and with the said
H. P., his heirs, executors, administrators and assigns, by these presents, that the said J.
C., his heirs, executors and administrators, or some of them, shall and will well and truly
pay or cause to be paid unto the said H. P., his heirs, executors, administrators or assigns,
the said yearly rent of dollars, hereby reserved, on the several days and times here-
inbefore mentioned and appointed for payment thereof, according to the true intent and
meaning of these presents. And the said H. P., for himself, his heirs, executors and
administrators, doth covenant, promise, grant and agree to and with the said J. C., his
executors, administrators and assigns, by these presents, that he, the said J. C., his exe-
cutors, administrators and assigns (paying the rent and performing the covenants afore-
said), shall, and lawfully may peaceably and quietly have, hold, use, occupy, possess and
enjoy the said demised premises, with the appurtenances, during the term aforesaid,
without the lawful let, suit, trouble, eviction, molestation or interruption of the said
H. P., his heirs or assigns, or of any other person or persons whatsoever. In witness, &c.
45. A LEASE MADE BY TENANTS IN COMMON.
THIS INDENTURE, made, &c., between A. B., &c., of the first part, C. D., &c., of the
second part, and E. F., &c., of the third part, witnesseth: that for and in consideration
of the rents, covenants and agreements hereinafter reserved and contained, and which, by
and on the part and behalf of the said E. F., his, &c., are to be paid, done and performed,
he, the said A. B., as to one undivided moiety or half part, the whole into two equal parts
to be divided, of all that messuage or tenement, with the appurtenances, hereinafter par-
ticularly mentioned and described, and the said C. D., as to one undivided moiety or half
part, the whole into two equal parts to be divided, of all that said, &c., have and each of
them hath (according to their several and respective shares and proportions aforesaid),
demised, leased, set and to farm let, and by these presents do, and each of them doth,
demise, lease, set and to farm let unto the said E. F., his, &c., all that, &c. (Describe the
parcels and insert the usual covenants, and then the following:) (4 covenant by one of
the lessors for quiet enjoyment of one undivided moiety.)
And the said A.B., for himself, his heirs, executors and administrators, doth covenant,
&c., to and with the said E. F., his executors, administrators and assigns, in manner fol-
lowing: (that is to say), that he, the said E. F., his executors, administrators or assigns.
paying the rent hereby reserved and performing the covenants and agreements herein:
before mentioned and contained, and which, on his and their parts, are or ought to be
paid and performed, shall and may, peaceably and quietly, have, hold, use, occupy, possess
and enjoy the said messuage, &c., with the appurtenances, hereby demised as to one
undivided moiety or half part thereof only, for and during the said term hereby granted,
without the let, suit, trouble, molestation or interruption of him, the said A. B., his heirs,
executors or administrators, or any other person or persons, lawfully claiming or to claim,
by, from or under him, them or any of them. (Add the like covenant from C. D. as to
one undivided moiety only.)
46. THE LESSOR COVENANTS TO SELL THE INHERITANCE TO THE LESSEE ON REQUEST.
Anp in case the said C. D. (the lessee), his heirs, executors or administrators or
assigns, shall, during the said term, be desirous to purchase the inheritance of the pre-
mises hereby demised, and shall give notice of such intention or desire in writing, during
the same term, unto the said A. B. (the lessor), his heirs or assigns, at his or their usual
place of abode, then he, the said A. B., his heirs and assigns, shall and will, at any time
during the said term, at the charges in the law of the said OC. D., his heirs, executors and
administrators or assigns, convey and assure the inheritance of the said hereby demised
premises unto the said ©. D., his heirs, executors, administrators or assigns, and to
the heirs and assigns of him or them, or as he or they shall direct, he, the said C. D., his
heirs, executors, &c., paying unto the said A. B., his heirs or assigns, the sum of ——,
as the consideration of such purchase, and also paying to him or them all arrears of rent
which shall be then due, &e.
LAW FORMS. 663
47, SpEcIAL FORM OF A LEASE WITH AUTHORITY, IN CERTAIN CASES, TO ENTER JUDGMENT IN
EJECTMENT. ‘
Memoranpum. [That A. B.], hath demised to [C. D.], a messuage or tenement [situate
on the north side of Cedar street, No. 389, between Third and Fourth streets , for the
term of [ten] years from the date hereof, ata yearly rent of [four bonded dollars,
payable quarterly, the first payment to be made on the ree day of [June] next;
and if the rent shall remain unpaid on any day on which the same ought to be paid,
then the lessor may enter on the premises, and proceed by distress and sale of the goods
there found, to levy the rent and all costs. ‘The lessee covenants with the lessor to pay
the rent punctually, as above provided for, and during the term to keep, and at the end
thereof peaceably deliver up, the premises in good order and repair, reasonable wear and
tear and damage by accidental fire excepted, and not assign this lease, nor underlet the
premises or any part thereof: and if the lessee shall in any particular violate any one
of his said covenants, then the lessor may cause a notice to be left on the premises of his
intention to determine this lease, and at the expiration of [thirty] days from the time of
so leaving such notice, this lease shall absolutely determine: and upon the expiration or
other determination of this lease, any attorney may, immediately thereafter, as attorney
for the lessee, sign an agreement for entering in any competent court an amicable action
and judgment in ejectment (without any stay of execution) against the lessee and all
persons claiming under him, for the recovering, by the lessor, of possession of the hereby
demised premises, for which this shall be a sufficient warrant; and the lessee hereby re-
leases to the lessor all errors and defects whatsoever, in entering such action or judgment,
or in any proceeding thereon, or concerning the same. No such determination of this
lease, nor taking or recovering possession of the premises, shall deprive the lessor of any
action against the lessee for the rent or for damages. All rights and liabilities herein
given to or imposed upon either of the parties hereto, shall extend to the heirs, executors,
administrators and assigns of such party. In witness whereof, the said parties have here-
unto set their hands and seals. Dated the first day of June, a. p. 1880.
Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of i (Signed) A. B. (sean.
F., Cc. D. lene
48. AssIGNMENT OF A LEASE.
Know atu mew by these presents, that I, the within-named E. D., for and in considera-
tion of the sum of one hundred dollars, to me in hand paid by KH. F., of, &c., at and before
the ensealing and delivering hereof, the receipt whereof I do hereby acknowledge, have
granted, assigned and set over, and by these presents do grant, assign and set over, unto
the said E. F., his executors, administrators and assigns, the within indenture of lease,
and all that messuage, &c., thereby demised, with the appurtenances: And also, all my
estate, right, title, term of years yet to come, claim and demand whatsoever, of, in, to or
out of the same: To have and to hold the said messuage, &c., unto the said KE. F., his
exeeutors, administrators and assigns, for the residue of the term within mentioned, under
the yearly rent and covenants within reserved and contained, on my part and behalf to
be done, kept and performed. In witness whereof, &c.
49. A SHORTER FORM.
Memoranpuu. This lst day of January 1880, the within-named E. D. hath this day
assigned and made over unto the undersigned KH. F., of, &c., all and singular the heredita-
ments and premises in the within-written lease described and granted, with the whole of
his estate and interest. As witness his hand, &c.
50. LETTERS OF ATTORNEY.
A letter of attorney is an instrument of writing authorizing a person who is called
the attorney of the person appointing him, to do any lawful act in the place or stead
of him who appoints, as to make a deed, collect and receive debts, &. If proved
by two or more of the witnesses thereunto, before any alderman or justice of the
peace, mayor or chief magistrate or officer of any city, town or place, where made
and certified under the common or public seal of such city, town or place, it is suffi-
cient in law. Such powers are in force until the agent or attorney has due notice
of a countermand, revocation, or the death of the constituent or person granting the
power. A letter of attorney may also be acknowledged before the same authorities.
Minors and married women cannot make attorneys; but infants, if of sufficient
discretion, and married women, may be attorneys. An attorney cannot substitute
but by express power. One is bound by every act of his general agent or attorney,
even if he exceeds his authority, unless there is notice. On the death of the con.
stituent, the power of attorney ceases, and all subsequent acts under it are void.
664 LAW FORMS.
51. GENERAL FORM OF A LETTER OF ATTORNEY.
Know aut MEN by these presents, that [I, A. B.], have constituted, made and appointed,
and by these presents do constitute, make and appoint(C. D. my] lawful attorney, for
jme], and in [my] name and stead, and to [my] use, to ask, demand, sue for, levy, recover
and receive, all such sum and sums of money, debts, rents, goods, wares, dues, accounts
and other demands whatsoever, which are or shall be due, owing, payable and belonging
to [me], or detained from [me] in any manner of ways or means whatsoever, especially,
é&c. [here state particularly what the attorney is required to execute], giving and granting
unto [my] said attorney, by these presents, [my] full and entire power and authority, in
and about the premises, to have, use and take, all lawful ways and means, in [my] name,
for the recovery thereof; and upon the receipt of any such debts, dues or sums of money
aforesaid, acquittances or other sufficient discharges, for [me] and in [my] name to make,
seal and deliver, and generally all and every other act and acts, thing and things, device
and devices, in the law, whatsoever, needful and necessary to be done in and about the
premises, for [me] and in [my] name to do, execute and perform, as fully, largely and
amply, to all intents and purposes, as [I] might or could do, if [I were] personally present,
or as if the matter required more special authority than is herein given; and attorneys
one or more under [him] for the purpose aforesaid to make and constitute, and again at
pleasure to revoke; ratifying, allowing and holding for firm and effectual, all and what-
soever [my] said attorney or [his] substitute shall lawfully doin and about the premises,
by virtue hereof. In witness whereof, [I] have hereunto set [my] hand and seal, the
[tenth] day of [May], in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and eighty.
Signed, sealed and delivered, A.B. [seat.]
in the presence of |
G. H., E. F.
COUNTY OF —.
Tuts [tenth] day of [May], a. p. 1880, personally appeared before me, the subscriber,
one of the justices of the peace in and for the said county of the above named
[A. B.], and acknowledged the foregoing power of attorney to be this] act and deed,
and desired the same might be recorded as such, according to law. Witness my hand and
seal, this [tenth] day of [May], a. p. 1880.
E. F., Justice of the Peace. [szat.]
52. GENERAL LETTER OF SUBSTITUTION.
To ALL PEOPLE to whom these presents shall come, C. D., of the city of Philadelphia,
and state of Pennsylvania, merchant, sends greeting: Whereas A. B., of the city of
Philadelphia, and state aforesaid, merchant, in and by a certain instrument of writing,
or letter of attorney, bearing date the tenth day of January one thousand eight hundred
and eighty, did make, constitute and appoint the said C. D. to, &e, [as in the original
power], as in and by the said letter of attorney [recorded, or intended to be recorded,
é&c.], relation being thereunto had, appears. Now know ye, that the said C. D. hath
made, appointed and substituted, and by these presents, by virtue of the power and
authority given to him by the said recited letter of attorney, doth make, appoint and sub-
stitute H. F., &e., to be the true and lawful attorney of the said A. B., the constituent in
the foregoing letter of attorney named, to do, execute and perform, all such acts, deeds,
matters and things, as shall and may be requisite and necessary to be done and performed
for effecting the purposes and object in the said letter of attorney contained, as fully and
effectually, in all respects, and to all intents and purposes, as if myself might or could
do, in virtue of the power and authority aforesaid, if personally present, hereby ratifyin,
and confirming all and whatsoever my said substitute may lawfully do in virtue hereor
In witness, &c.
53. To RECEIVE MONEY ON A BOND.
Know au Men by these presents, that I, A. B., of the borough of R——, and state
of Pennsylvania, hatter, do make, constitute and appoint C. D., of the city of Baltimore,
in the state of Maryland, my true and lawful attorney, for me and in my name, to ask,
demand and receive from K. F., of the city of Baltimore aforesaid, the sum of three
hundred dollars, due unto me in and by a certain bond or obligation, bearing date the
day of , and upon non-payment thereof, to have, use and take, all lawful ways
and means, in my name or otherwise, for the recovery of the same, with the interest
thereon, if any be due, by attachment, bill, plaint, arrest or otherwise. In witness
whereof, &e.
54, To RECEIVE DIVIDENDS ON STOCK.
Know Abt Men by these presents, that I, A. B., of the city of L——, and state of
Pennsylvania, brewer, do make, constitute and appoint ©. D., of the city of W—,
esquire, my true and lawful attorney, for me and in my name, to receive the dividends
which are, or shall be, payable, according to law, on all the stock standing in my name
LAW FORMS. 665
in the books of the treasury of the United States for in the books of the loan-office, or
pank of, &c., as the case may be], with the power also to make and substitute an attorney
or attorneys under him, for that purpose, and to do all lawful acts requisite for effecting
the premiese hereby ratifying and confirming all that my said attorney or his substitutes
shall lawfully do by virtue hereof. In witness, &e.
55. To convey Lanns.!
Kyow aL. MEN by these presents, that I, A. B., of, &c., have made, constituted and ap-
pointed, and by these presents do make, constitute and appoint, and in my place and
stead, put and depute C. D., of, &c., my true and lawful attorney, for me and in my name,
place and stead, to grant, bargain and sell, all that messuage, &c. [here describe the
premises], with the appurtenances, and all my estate, right, title and interest therein,
unto such person or persons, and for such price or prices, as he shall think proper; and
also for me, and in my name, place and stead, and as my proper act and deed, to sign,
seal, deliver and acknowledge, all such deed or deeds of conveyance as shall be necessary
for the absolute granting and assuring of the premises unto the purchaser or purchasers,
in fee-simple. Giving, &e.
56. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF A DEED.
Kwow aut men by these presents, that I, the within-named A. B., do hereby nominate
and appoint C. D., E. F. and G. H., all of W. county, in the state of Vermont, or any
one of them, my true and lawful attorneys for me, and in my name, to acknowledge the
within deed, and the lands and tenements therein mentioned, to be the estate and property
of the within-named J. K. In witness, &e.
57. To ACKNOWLEDGE SATISFACTION ON A MORTGAGE.
To aut ProPLe to whom these presents shall come, E. D., of the city of Philadelphia,
merchants, sendeth greeting: Whereas, A. B., of, &c., by indenture of mortgage under
his hand and seal, bearing date the day of ——, 18—, for the better securing the
payment of the sum of three hundred dollars, with its interest, which he was justly in-
debted to the said C. D., on a certain obligation therein mentioned, did grant, bargain,
sell, release and confirm, unto the said C. D., and to his heirs and assigns, the premises
in the said indenture particularly described. To hold the same until due satisfaction
should be made for the said debtand interest, then the said indenture of mortgage to be
null and void, as by the said recited indenture, recorded in the offiee for recording of
deeds at R —, in and for the county of Butler, in mortgage-book A., No. 2, page —,
relation being thereunto had, appears; and whereas, the said A. B. hath fully satisfied
and paid the said debt and interest; therefore, know ye, the said C. D. hath made, consti-
tuted and appointed, and by these presents doth make, constitute and appoint E. F., of,
&c., his true and lawful attorney, for him, and in his name, to appear in the office afore-
said,.and there acknowledge and enter satisfaction in the margin of the record aforesaid,
for the said debt and interest, in full discharge of the said mortgage, and of the obliga-
tion therein recited, and for his so doing this shall be his sufficient warrant. In witness
whereof, &c.
58. A POWER OF ATTORNEY TO LEASE LANDS NOT EXCEEDING TWENTY YEARS.
Kwow aLL MEN, &c., —— and by these presents do give unto the said C. D. full power
and authority for me, and in my name, by writing indented, or by several writings
indented, to demise, grant and to farm let, all those my messuages, &c., situate, lying or
being, in the county of , or any of the premises, as to the said C. D. shall seem meet
and convenient, to such person or persons, and during such term of years (so that the
said lease or leases do not exceed the number of twenty years), with such reservation of
rents, covenants, grants, agreements and conditions, to be contained in the said several
writings indented, as to the said C. D. shall seem expedient; and also, in my name, to
seal and deliver such writing or writings indented, as my deed or deeds, and the one part
of all and every such writing or writings indented, as to the said C. D., in my name,
shall be in form before rehearsed, to and for my use with.him to retain and keep. And
I, the said A. B., and my heirs, shall and will, at all times hereafter, ratify and confirm
all and every act and acts, thing and things, which he, the said C. D., in my name, shall
lawfully do, by virtue hereof, in the premises. In witness, &c.
59, A REVOCATION OF A POWER OF ATTORNEY.
To aLL persons to whom these presents shall come, A. B., &c., sendeth greeting:
Whereas, I, the said A. B., by my letter of attorney bearing date ——, did constitute,
&c., C. D., &e., my attorney, for certain purposes, and with certain powers, in the said
letter of attorney contained, as therein at large appeareth: Know ye, that I, the said A.
' Powers relating to lands should be recorded in the county where the lands lie.
666 LAW FORMS.
B., for divers considerations me thereunto moving, have made void, countermanded
and revoked, and do hereby make void, countermand and revoke, the said letter of at-
torney, and all and singular the powers, &., given by virtue thereof. In witness, &.
.
60. PowERS OF ATTORNEY TO ATTORNEYS AT LAW.
POWER OF ATTORNEY BY DEFENDANT.
Kwow ALL MEN by these presents, that I, A. B., of the city of Lancaster, do here-
by make, appoint and constitute, C. D., esquire, of the borough of R——, my good
and lawful attorney, in law and in fact, to appear for me in a certain plea, pending in
the court of common pleas, wherein E. F. is plaintiff, and I, the said A. B., am de-
fendant, and take defence, and use all lawful ways and means, in my name therein, in
as full and effectual a manner as I could do, if personally present in the said court;
hereby confirming and sanctioning whatsoever my said attorney, in the said plea,
touching the defence thereof, may do according to law, in the premises. Witness my
hand and seal, this —— day of ——, one thousand eight hundred and eighty.
A. B. [SEAL.]
Witnesses,
C. D., E. F.
BY PLAINTIFF TO INSTITUTE SUIT.
Know ALL men, &c. [as above]. To institute for me, and in my name, a plea of
—against a certain E. F., ina proper and convenient court of law ; and the same to
conduct to trial and judgment in as speedy a manner as the said C. D., reasonably
can; and to conduct the prosecution of the said suit or action, so to be brought, and
use all lawful ways and means, in my name therein, in as full and effectual a manner
as I, the said A. B., could do, if personally present; hereby confirming and sanction-
ing whatsoever my said attorney in the said plea, touching the prosecution thereof,
may do, according to law, in the premises. Witness, &c. [as above].
BY PLAINTIFF TO CONDUCT SUIT ALREADY BROUGHT.
Know ALL MEN,,&c. [as above]. To appear for me, ina certain plea or action, -com-
menced and pending in the Butler county court of common pleas, wherein I, the said
A. B., am plaintiff, and a certain EH. F. is defendant ; and to conduct the prosecution
of the said plea or action, so as aforesaid brought, and use all lawful ways and means,
in my name therein, in as full and effectual a manner as J could do if personally pres-
ent; hereby confirming and sanctioning whatsoever my said attorney in the said plea,
touching the prosecution thereof, may do, according to law, in the premises. Wit-
ness, &c. [as above].
61. Liens.
The benefit of the act of 16th June 1836, is extended to wharf-builders, to paper-
hangers, to plumbers, gas-fitters and persons furnishing and erecting grates and
furnaces, and to persons erecting buildings by contract. Materials furnished for,
though not used in the erection of a building, constitute a lien. If not furnished for,
although used in a building, no lien is acquired. The lien binds no greater estate in
the ee than that of a person in possession, at whose instance the building is
erected.
62. ForM oF A MECHANIC’S LIEN.
In the [court of common pleas] for the city and county of Philadelphia; [A. B.
and CO. D.] claim a lien for [two hundred] dollars, against all that certain [three-story
LAW FORMS. 667
brick house], together with the lot whereon the same is erected, situate in the [city]
of Philadelphia [in Buttonwood street, north side, No. 1005, three doors above Tenth
street], belonging or said to belong to [J. K.]. [If for work and labor, say for work
and labor], viz, —— done and performed in the erection and construction of said
——, by the said ——, as a ——, employed in the erection and construction of the
said ——, within six months last past: (for materials, viz., —— found and provided
for the erection and construction of said [house] by [us], the said [A. B. and C. D.],
as a builder employed in furnishing the materials for the said ——, within six months
last past). A bill, or more particular statement of the materials, so found and pro-
vided, is hereto annexed. [A. B.] therefore requires the prothonotary of the said
court to enter the same as a lien against the premises aforesaid, agreeable to the pro-
visions of the act of assembly in such case made and provided.
To [H. M.] Esquire, Prothonotary of said court.
Philadelphia, A. D. 1880.
63. MortTGAGE.
A modern mortgage may be described to be a conveyance of lands by a debtor to
his creditor, as a pledge and security for the repayment of a sum of money borrowed,
with a proviso, that such conveyance shall be void on payment of the money and in-
terest on a certain day; and, in all mortgages, although the money be not paid at the
time appointed, by which the conveyance of the land becomes absolute at law, yet
the mortgagor has still an equity of redemption, that is a right in equity on payment
of the principal, interest and costs, within a reasonable time, to call for a reconveyance
of the lands. He who gives the mortgage is called the mortgagor, he who takes it
the mortgagee.
Proceedings for recovery of money on mortgage in Pennsylvania, are by scire facias.
The mortgage to be recorded within six months. The lien of mortgages is according
to priority of record, except mortgages for purchase-money, which take effect from
date, if recorded within sixty days.
64. ForM oF A MORTGAGE.
THIS INDENTURE may the [tenth] day of [May], in the year of our Lord one thou-
sand eight hundred and [eighty], between [A. B. of the city of Pittsburgh, currier],
of the one part, and [C. D., of the same place, carter], of the other part. Whereas,
the said [A. B.], in and by a [certain] obligation or writing obligatory under [his]
hand and seal, duly executed, bearing even date herewith, stands bound unto the said
[C. D.], in the sum of [two thousand dollars], lawful money of the United States of
America, conditioned for the payment of the just sum of [one thousand dollars, law-
ful money as aforesaid, in five years from the date thereof, together with interest
thereon, payable half-yearly at the rate of six per cent. per annum, without any fraud
or further delay ; and for the production to the said [C. D.] or [his] executors, admin-
istrators or assigns, on or before the ——day of , of each and every year, of re-
ceipts for all taxes of the current year assessed upon the mortgaged premises. Pro-
vided, however, and it is thereby expressly agreed, that if at any time default shall be
made in the payment of interest as aforesaid, for the space of thirty days after any
half-yearly payment thereof shall fall due, or in such production to the said [C. D.],
or [his] executors, administrators or assigns, on or before the —— day of of
each and every year, of such receipts for such taxes of the current year upon the
premises mortgaged, then and in such case the whole principal debt aforesaid shall, at
the option of the said [C. D, his] executors, administrators or assigns, become due
and payable immediately; and payment of said principal debt, of [one thousand
dollars], and all interest thereon, may be enforced and recovered at once, anything
668 LAW FORMS.
therein contained to the contrary notwithstanding. And provided further, however,
and it is hereby expressly agreed, that if at any time hereafter, by reason of any de-
fault in payment, either of said principal sum of [one thousand dollars], at maturity,
or of said interest, or in production of said receipts for taxes, within the time specified,
a writ of fier’ facias is properly issued upon the judgment obtained upon said obliga-
tion, or by virtue of said warrant of attorney, or a writ of scire facias is properly issued
upon this intention of mortgage, an attorney’s commission for collection, viz., [five]
per cent., shall be payable, and shall be recovered in addition to all principal and in-
terest then due, besides costs of suit, as in and by the said recited obligation and the
condition thereof, relation being thereunto had may more fully and at large appear.
Now, this indenture witnesseth, that the said [A. B.], as well for and in consideration
of the aforesaid debt or principal sum of [one thousand dollars], and for the better
securing the payment of the same, with interest as aforesaid, under the said [C. D.,
his] executors, administrators and assigns, in discharge of the said recited obligation,
as for and in consideration of the further sum of one dollar unto [him] in hand well
and truly paid by the said [C. D.], at and before the sealing and delivery hereof, the re-
ceipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, hath granted, bargained, sold, aliened, enfeoffed,
released and confirmed, and by these presents doth grant, bargain, sell, alien, enfeoff,
release and confirm unto the said [C. D., his] heirs and assigns [here describe particu-
larly the property]; together with all and singular the ways, waters, water-courses,
rights, liberties, privileges, improvements, hereditaments and appurtenances whatso-
ever thereunto belonging, or in any wise appertaining, and the reversions and re-
mainders, rents, issues and profits thereof; to have and to hold the said hereditaments
and premises hereby granted, or mentioned and intended so to be, with the appurte-
nances, unto the said [C. D., his] heirs and assigns, to and for the only proper use
and behoof of the said [C. D., his] heirs and assigns forever. Provided always,
nevertheless, that if the said [A. B., his] heirs, executors, administrators or assigns, do
and shall well and truly pay, or cause to be paid, unto the said [C. D., his] executors,
administrators or assigns, the aforesaid debt or principal sum of [one thousand dollars],
on the day and time hereinbefore mentioned and appointed for payment of the same,
together with interest as aforesaid, and shall produce to the said [C. D.] or [his] ex-
ecutors, administrators or assigns, on or before the —— day of- of each and
every year, receipts for all taxes of the current year assessed upon the mortgaged
premises, without any fraud or further delay, that then, and from thenceforth, as
well this present indenture, and the estate hereby granted, as the said recited obliga-
tion shall cease, determine and become void, any thing hereinbefore contained to the
contrary thereof in any wise notwithstanding. And provided also, that it shall and
may be lawful for the said [C. D., his] executors, administrators or assigns, when and
as soon as the principal debt or sum hereby secured shall become due and payable as
aforesaid, or in case default shall be made for the space of [thirty] days in the pay-
ment of interest on the said principal sum, of [one thousand dollars], after any pay-
ment thereof shall fall due, or in case there shall be default in the production to the
said [C. D.] or [his] executors, administrators or assigns, on or before the —— day of
of each and every year, of such receipts for such taxes of the current year
assessed upon the mortgaged premises, to sue out forthwith a writ or writs of scire
facias upon this indenture of mortgage, and to proceed thereon to judgment and ex-
ecution, for the recovery of the whole of said principal debt, of [one thousand dollars],
and all interest due thereon, together with an attorney’s commission for collection,
viz., [five] per cent., besides costs of suit, without further stay, any law, usage or
custom to the contrary notwithstanding. In witness whereof, the said parties to these
presents have hereunto interchangeably set their hands and seals. Dated.the day and
year first above written.
Sealed and delivered in the presence of us, | A. B. [SEAL]
E. T., BR. 8.
LAW FORMS. 669
On the [tenth] day of [May], Anno Domini 1880, before me fan alderman in and for
the city of Pittsburgh], personally appeared the above-named [A. B.], and in due form
of law acknowledged the above indenture of mortgage to be [his] act and deed, and
desired the same might be recorded as such. Witness my hand and seal, the day
and year aforesaid.
G. H., Alderman. [sEAL. ]
65, ASSIGNMENT OF a MORTGAGE.
Know all MEN by these presents, that I, A. B., the mortgagee within named, for and
in consideration of the sum of six hundred dollars to me in hand paid by C. D., of, &e.,
at-and before the sealing and delivering hereof, the receipt whereof is hereby acknow-
ledged, have granted, bargained, sold, assigned and set over, and by these presents do
grant, bargain, sell, assign, and set over, unto the said C. D., his heirs and assigns, the
within indenture of mortgage, and all that messuage, &c., therein mentioned and
described. Together with the rights, members, and appurtenances thereunto belonging,
and all my estate, right, title and interest therein: To have and to fold all and singular
the premises hereby granted and assigned, or mentioned, or intended so to be, unto the
said C. D., his heirs and assigns for ever; subject, nevertheless, to the right and equity
of redemption of the within named E. F., his heirs and assigns (if any they have), in the
same. In witnesss whereof, &c.
[It should be acknowledged, or proved and recorded. ]
66. Roaps.
The act of 1700, c. 57, was the first enactment in Pennsylvania, on the subject
of erecting bridges and maintaining highways. It continued in force until the act
of 1802. The revised act, 13th June 1836, supplies the place of both the above-
mentioned acts.
Roads are of three kinds in Pennsylvania, viz.: Public-roads, called in the act
of 1700, “the king’s highways,” laid out by order of the governor and council;
the records of which are in the office of the secretary of the commonwealth. Roads
or cartways, leading to such great provincial roads, laid out by order of court,
on return of viewers. Private roads, likewise laid out by order of court on the
application of any person for a road to be laid out to or from their plantations or
dwelling-places, or to or from the highways. In all grants of land, either by the
proprietaries or commonwealth, six per cent. has been added in quantity to every
man’s land, for the purpose of contributing to the establishing of roads or highways.
The word road, unless where the word private is prefixed, is uniformly applied to
public roads, and is synonymous with the term highway. The word street is also
considered equivalent to highway. | :
The court of quarter sessions of every county in which the act of 1836 is in
force, on being petitioned to grant a view of a road in their respective county, is
required to appoint, as often as may be needful, six discreet and respectable citizens,
qualified to vote for members of the legislature, but not residing on or owning land
along the route of such road, to view the ground proposed for such road, and make
report of their proceedings to the next term. The viewers, if they agree that there
is occasion for a road, are required to lay out the same, having respect to the short-
est distance and the best ground, and with the least injury to private property, and,
as far as practicable, in conformity to the desire of the petitioners. To make a valid
view, five of the six must view the ground, and four of the actual viewers concur in
the report.
The report of the viewers must be made to the next term of the court, and state
particularly: 1. Who of them were present at the view; 2. Whether they were
severally sworn or affirmed ; 8. Whether the road be necessary for a public or pri-
vate road; annex a plot or draft, stating the courses and distances, noting briefly
improvements through which it may pass, and, whenever practicable, lay out the
road at an elevation not exceeding five degrees, except at the crossing of ravines
and streams, where, by moderate filling and bridging, the declination of the road
may be preserved within that limit.
The court are to direct of what width the road shall be. Public roads must not
exceed fifty, nor private roads twenty-five feet in width. Damages are to be assessed
by six disinterested persons, appointed by the court, on petition, who are to report
in writing, and after confirmation by the court, the amount of damages are to be
paid by the county treasurer.
670 LAW FORMS.
In cases of private roads, swinging gates may be allowed by the court, after view
and favorable report, and may be put up at the expense of the parties applying for
the same, by petition, when the same may be done without much inconvenience
to the persons using such road. Private roads must be opened, fenced and kept in
repair, by the petitioners, their heirs and assigns. The damages are to be paid by
the same persons, and the road will not be opened until they are fully paid. Other
persons than the petitioners may, afterwards, use a private road, after contributing
to the expense such sum as the court may direct.
This general system, however, established by the act of 1836, has been so fre-
quently altered by special legislation, extending only to particular counties, that it
is not safe to rely on it as of universal application. Parties concerned in road
eases should always apply at once to experienced counsel, as there are no cases
in the courts in which more oversights are committed than in those arising under
the road laws, and none in which more vexatious delays may be interposed by those
desirous of obstructing the proceedings. The various special acts will be found
collected in Purdon’s Digest, to which the inquirer is referred.
67. PrviTioN FOR A PUBLIC ROAD.
To the Judges of the court of quarter sessions of the peace of the county of
The petition of the subscribers respectfully showeth: That they labor under great
inconvenience for the want of a public road or highway (or private road), to lead from
to , in said county [there must be no intermediate points made in the road
prayed for] ; they therefore pray the court to appoint persons duly qualified to view the
ground proposed for said road, and to lay out the same according to law.
68. ORDER OF COURT ON THE ABOVE PETITION.
Ar acourt of quarter sessions of the peace of the county of , held at , in
and for said county, on the —— day of ——, in the year one thousand eight hundred
and ——. On the petition of the subscribers thereto, setting forth that they labor
under great inconvenience for the want of a public road or highway (or private
road), to lead from —— to ,in said county, and praying the court to appoint
proper persons to view the ground for said road, and to lay out the same as aforesaid,—
Thereupon the court appoint A. B., &. (who being first severally sworn or affirmed
to perform their duties impartially and according to the best of their judgment), to view
the ground proposed for said road, and if they, or any five of them, view the same, and
any four of the actual viewers agree that there is occasion for a road, to proceed to lay
out the same (having respect to the shortest distance and the best ground for a road), in
such a manner as to do the least injury to private property, as far as practicable, agreeable
to the desire of the petitioners, and, if practicable, at an elevation not exceeding five
degrees, except at the crossing of ravines and streams, where, by moderate filling and
bridging, the declination of the road may be preserved within that limit.
Ordered, that the viewers ‘‘report at the next term, stating particularly who of them
were present at the view, whether the road desired be necessary for a public road (omit
if a private road), annex and return a plot or draft thereof, stating the courses and dis-
tances (in words at length), and noting briefly the improvements through which it may
pass.” In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand, and aflixed the seal of the said
court, this —— day of ——, Anno Domini one thousand eight hundred and
Clerk.
69. Rerurn OF THE INQUEST.
To the Judges of the court of quarter sessions of the peace, in the within or annexed
order named: We, the subscribers, the persons appointed by the said court, to view and
lay out the road therein mentioned, report, that having been first severally sworn or
affirmed, in the manner and form prescribed by the said order, all of us (or five of us,
naming them), having viewed the ground for the proposed road, and four of us concur-
ring, did lay out, and now return the same for a public (or private) road, beginning,
&e. (here describe the courses and distances in words at length], with reference to the
improvements through which it passes, a plot or draft whereof is hereto annexed.
Witness our hands and seals the day of ——, Anno Domini one thousand eight
hundred and ——.
Or, having viewed, &c., the route of the proposed road as within directed, we (or, &e.)
are of opinion, that there is no occasion to lay out the same. Witness, &c. .
LAW FORMS. : 671
70. A Pevirion FoR DAMAGES. ,
Tue petition of the subscribers respectfully represents: That a public road or high-
way (or private road] was lately laid out and opened by order of this court from ——,
&e., to ——, &c., which road is laid out and opened through the land of your petitioners,
and by which they have sustained injury. They therefore pray the court to appoint per-
sons to view the premises, assess the damages sustained, and report the same to the
court at the next term thereof.
71. ORDER oF couRT.
Ata Court, &. On the petition of A. and B., setting forth that a public road or high-
way [or private road] has lately been laid out and opened by the order of the court, and
raying the court to appoint persons to view and assess the damages they have sustained
by reason of said road passing through their lands: thereupon the court appoint A. B.,
&c., six disinterested persons, none of whom reside on their own land along the route of
said road [who being first severally sworn or affirmed to perform the duties with impar-
tiality, and to the best of their judgments], are to’ view the premises, and if any five of them
view the said road, and any four agree that the petitioners or any of them have sustained
damages by reason of the said road passing through their lands, then to proceed to assess
the same to each of the said petitioners, taking into consideration the advantages they
may severally derive from the said road passing through their lands. Ordered, that the
etitioners give notice to one or more of the commissioners of the county aforesaid (or
in case of a private road, to the parties interested). It is further ordered, that the
viewers state in their report who of them were present at the view ; whether they were
severally sworn or affirmed, and that they report at the next term of this court. In
witness, &c.
72, PRIVATE ROADS, PETITIONS, &o.
The form of the order and other proceedings on application for private roads will
be the same as for public roads, except omitting in the order of the words, “ stating
particularly whether they judge the same necessary for a public or a private road.”
73. PETITION FoR GATES ON a PRIVATE ROAD.
To the Judges, &c. On the petition of A. B., C. D., setting forth that they labor under
great inconvenience for want of hanging a swinging gate or gates on a private road lead-
ing from —— to ——, and praying the court for leave 1o hang and maintain, at their
own expense, a gate or gates across said road.
Report.
We, the subscribers, appointed to view, &., report that we, after being first severally
sworn or affirmed, according to said order, viewed the said road as directed, and are of
opinion that a gate may be hung upon the said road at ——, according to the prayer
of the petitioners, without much inconvenience to the persons using the said road.
Witness our hands and seals, &c.
74. PETITION FOR VACATING ROADS.
To the Judges, &c. The petition of the subscribers respectfully represents: That a
road was formerly laid out by order of the court from to——, in said county,
beginning, &c. (here set forth, in a clear and distinct manner, the situation and other
circumstances of the road, and the parts which the applicants desire vacated), which
road your petitioners conceive has become useless, inconvenient and burdensome. Your
petitioners, therefore, pray the court that the same road may be vacated.
15, Report oF VIEWERS.
Ws, the subscribers, appointed to view the road therein mentioned, report that in pur-
suance of said order (having been severally sworn or affirmed as herein directed), we
have viewed the said road, and are of opinion that the same is (not) in our opinion,
useless, inconvenient and burdensome, and ought (no?) therefore to be vacated. Witness
our hands and seals, this day of ——, a. p. ——.
76. ORDER.
Atracourt, &c. The persons appointed at —— sessions, a. D. ——, to view a road
leading from, &e. to ——, &e., and to judge whether the same has become useless,
inconvenient and burdensome, having been severally sworn or affirmed, as within directed,
report, that they have viewed the road therein mentioned, and are of opinion that it has
672 LAW FORMS.
become useless, inconvenient and burdensome, and ought to be vacated; whereupon the
court confirm the said report, and order that the said road may be vacated.
77. FoR ANNULLING PROCEEDINGS HAD BEFORE THE ROAD IS OPENED.
Petition.
Tue petition of the subscribers, being a majority of the original petitioners, respect-
fully represents: That a petition was presented to this court, at —— sessions last, signed
by your petitioners, praying the court to appoint proper persons to view and lay out a
road from to ——, which was accordingly done; and the said viewers so appointed
did view, lay out and return for public (or private) use a road, beginning, &c., ’ which
was, on due consideration, approved of and confirmed by the court; that the said road
not yet having been opened, and it appearing to your petitioners to be useless, and if
opened would become hurdensome—they therefore pray the court to appoint persons not
residing on or owning land on the route of the said road, to view the same, and make
report according to law.
78. REPORT OF VIEWERS.
We, the subscribers, appointed to view the road herein mentioned, do report: That, in
pursuance of the said order, having been severally sworn or affirmed, we have viewed the
said road, and are of opinion, the same, if opened, will (or will not) be useless and
burdensome.
79. PETITION TO VACATE A STATE ROAD, SUPPLIED BY a TURNPIKE.
To the Judges, &c. The petition of the subscribers respectfully represents: That part
of the road leading from ——- to , in the township (or townships) of , and county
aforesaid, has been supplied and rendered useless by a substantial and permanent turn-
pike, made and completed agreeable to law, from to They, therefore, pray
. the court to appoint persons to view the road, so supplied and rendered useless, and
make report to the court according to law.
80. PrtitroN FOR A REVIEW.
To the Judges, &c. The petition of the subscribers respectfully showeth: That a road
hath been lately laid out, by order of the court, from, &c. (here set forth the road as
reported by the original viewers), which road, if confirmed by the court, will be very injur-
ious to your petitioners. They, therefore, pray the court to appoint proper persons to
review the said road, &c., as in case of views.
81. PETITION FOR A ROAD ON A COUNTY LINE.
To the Judges, &c. The petition of the subscribers respectfully represents : That your
etitioners labor under great inconvenience for want of a public road or highway, to
ead on the line which divides the said counties from in county, to ——
in —— county. Your petitioners therefore pray the court to appoint proper persons to
view and lay out the same according to law.
82. REPORT THEREON.
We, the subscribers appointed within, and a similar order from the court of quarter
sessions of county, to view and lay out the road therein mentioned, report, that, in
ursuance of said orders, having been severally sworn or affirmed, we have viewed and
aid out, and do return, for public (or private) use, the following road, to wit: Beginning,
&e. (here describe the courses and distances in words at length, with references to the im-
provements through which it passes) : or that there is no occasion to lay out the same.
83. Prririon FOR A COUNTY BRIDGE.
To the Judges, &c. The petition of the subscribers respectfully showeth: That a
bridge is much wanted over —— creek, at the place where the public highway to ——
crosses the said creek, in the township of ——, in said county ; and that the erection of
said bridge will require more aes than it is reasonable one or two adjoining town-
ships should bear. They, therefore, &c. (as in the case of public roads), pray the court
to appoint persons to view the premises.
84, Report THEREON.
We, the subscribers, appointed to view the place proposed for a bridge, in the within
order mentioned, after being severally sworn or affirmed, as within directed, report, that
in our opinion, a bridge over —— creek, at the place where the public highway to. ——
LAW FORMS. 673
crosses the said creek, is necessary, and that the erecting of such a bridge would be
attended with more expense than it is reasonable the said township, or two adjoining
townships should bear.
(If the viewers are of opinion that a change or variation in the route of the said road
is necessary, add the following :)
And we further report, that after examination, we are of opinion, that a change or
variation in the bed and route of the road would be an improvement, and saving of
expense in the erection of said bridge, and, therefore, report, that the route of the road be
changed in the following manner : (here particularly describe the change proposed, together
with a map or plot thereof). Witness our hands and seals, this day of , A. De
18—.
85. PETITION FOR A BRIDGE ON A COUNTY LINE.
To the Judges of the court, &e. The petition of the subscribers, counties of ——
and —— respectfully represent: That a bridge is much wanted over creek, being
the line of the place where the public highway to —— crosses said creek, in the town-
skip of ——, in —— county, and in the township of ——, in county ; and that the
erection of such bridge will require more expense than it is reasonable the said township
should bear; your petitioners pray the court to appoint persons to view the premises, and
take such order on the subject as is required and directed by the acts of assembly in
such case made and provided.
86. DUE-BILL.
$260.00 Lancaster, June 4th, 1880.
I have this day made a full settlement of all accounts with A. B., and I acknow-
ledge myself to be indebted to him in the sum of two hundred and sixty dollars.
(Signed) c. D.
Such a due-bill may be assigned by C. D., thus :—
For a valuable consideration I assign to E. F., all my right, title and interest in the
above due-bill, without recourse to me. (Signed) A.B.
Witnesses at signing, G. H. and I. J.
Upon such a due-bill, or upon such an assignment of such a due-bill, suit may
be brought by the holder of the bill. :
87. PROMISSORY NOTES.
$560.30 Pittsburgh, July 20th, 1880.
Ninety days after date I promise to pay to the order of K. L., five hundred and
sixty dollars and thirty cents, without defalcation, for value received. M.N.
ANOTHER FORM.
$320.40 Harrisburg, July 20th, 1880.
At the Bank of Harrisburg, on the first day of October next, I promise to pay,
or cause to be paid, to O. P., or order, three hundred and twenty dollars and forty cents,
without defalcation, for value received. . R.
If either of the foregoing notes is passed away, it must be indorsed by the person
in whose favor it is drawn ; that is, he must write his name on the back of the note.
and thus authorize the person to whom he thus assigns it, to receive the money, or
bring suit for it, if not paid at maturity.
‘ ANOTHER FORM.
$475.25 Northumberland, July 20th, 1880.
Sixty days after date, I promise to pay to S. T., four hundred and seventy-five
dollars and twenty-five cents, for value received. Vv. Ww.
This note cannot-be assigned, because the maker of the ‘note does not promise to
pay to any person but S. T. the amount of the note. If V. W. were to indorse the
above note, and give it to X. Y., and X. Y. were to bring suit in his own name, he
could not recover, because the note is not payable to order.
48
674 LAW FORMS
JUDGMENT NOTE.
$500.00 Philadelphia, May 23d, 1880.
Thirty days after date, I promise to pay to A. B., or his assigns, the sum of five
hundred dollars, without defaleation, for value received; and I hereby authorize any
attorney of any court of record in Pennsylvania, or any other state, to confess judgment
against me for the said sum. J.B.
JUDGMENT NOTE WITH WAIVER OF EXEMPTION.
$1000.00 Pittsburgh, April 2d, 1881.
Nine months after date, I promise to pay to J. K., or his assigns, the sum of
one thousand dollars, without defaleation, for value received ; and I hereby authorize
any attorney of any court of record in Pennsylvania, or any other state, to confess judg-
ment against me for the said sum, with release of errors, &c.; and I hereby also waive
all stay of execution from and after the maturity of the above note. And I do, for myself
and my legal representatives, hereby waive and relinquish unto the said J. K. and his
legal representatives, all benefit that may accrue to me by virtue of any and every law
made or to be made, to exempt any of my property or estate from levy and sale under
execution, or any part of the proceeds arising from the sale thereof, from the payment
of the said moneys or any part thereof. A.C.
88. RECEIPTS.
Bedford, July 10th, 1880.
Received from A. B., the sum of two hundred and ten dollars, in full for a horse and
a pair of oxen, which I this day sold and delivered to him. c. D.
$210.00
FORM FOR RENT.
Sunbury, July 10th, 1880.
Received from E. F., one hundred and twenty dollars, being in full for one quarter's
rent of a dwelling-house, No. 10 Smith street, rented by me to him as per agreement,
which payment pays his rent in full to this day. G. H.
$120.00
WHEN THE MONEY IS PAID BY @ THIRD PERSON.
Greensburg, July 10th, 1880.
Received from 1. J., by K. L., the sum of three hundred and fifty dollars, for goods
sold and delivered by me to said I. J., and which is in full of all accounts between us.
M.N.
$350.00
A receipt in full does not foreclose all inquiry. If it can be shown that there
was fraud, misrepresentation or mistake, by which more or less money was paid
than ought to have been paid, an inquiry will be gone into, to the end that right
and justice may be done.
WHEN THE MONEY IS FOR THE USE OF ANOTHER.
: : Downingtown, May 4th, 1880.
Received from O. P., the sum of sixty dollars and ten cents, for work and labor done
and services rendered by Q. R. for the said O. P. Ss. T.
$60.10
FOR INTEREST PAID ON A BOND.
; . York, May 20th, 1880.
Received from U. W., the sum of thirty dollars, for one year’s ineateahek $500, due me
the first day of May inst., on a bond which I hold of the said U. W.
$30.00
FOR A PROMISSORY NOTE.
; : ; Reading, May 14th, 1880
Received from A. B., his promissory note, payable to myself or order, for five hundred
dollars, for a quantity of lumber bought from'me by the said A. B. which note, when
paid, will be in full of all demands. : a.
$500.00
LAW FORMS. 875
FOR CATTLE, ETC., PUT OUT TO WINTER.
; Tinicum, November 2d, 1880.
Received this day from G. H., by H. F., six oxen and four cows [or whatever other
animals may be received], which cattle I promise to keep through the winter, feedin
them on good hay, &c., and to return them on the Ist day of April, a. p. 1881, he first
paying me four dollars each for the keep of said cattle. LJ.
When such receipt as the above is given, which partakes of the character of an
agreement, the person who gives it should keep a copy, and have it compared and
witnessed.
89. LasT WILL AND TESTAMENT.
WILL AND TESTAMENT is a voluntary disposition of what a person wishes to be
done respecting his estate, real and personal, after his decease. Every person capable
of binding himself by contract, is capable of making a will; but no will is effectual
unless the testator were, at the time of making the same, of the age of twenty-one
years, and upwards. By act 11th April 1848, a married woman may dispose by her
last will, of her separate property, whether the same accrues to her before or during
coverture, provided the said wil] be executed in the presence of two or more wit-
nesses, neither of whom shall be her husband. Where a single woman makes a
will, and afterwards marries, such marriage is a revocation of the will.
Wills and testaments are of two kinds, viz., written and verbal or nuncupative,
which is where a person being sick, and for fear lest death, want of sufficient speech
or memory, should come so suddenly upon him that he should be prevented, if he
waited, from writing his testaments, desires his friends to bear witness of his last
will, and which must be in the presence of three persons, and then declare the
same before them; such declaration being proved by two of the witnesses after his
decease, is reduced to writing by the ordinary register of wills, and is as valid as if
it had been originally written by the testator, so far as relates to his personal pro-
perty; but lands are only devisable by a will and testament, put in writing in the
lifetime of the testator.
Every will must be in writing, and unless the person making the same be pre-
vented by the extremity of his last sickness, must be signed by him at the end
thereof, or by some person in his presence, and by his express direction ; and in all
cases, must be proved by the oaths or affirmations of two or more competent wit-
nesses, otherwise it will be of no effect. The making of a mark or cross at the end
of the will, is a sufficient signing. Where the testimony of the subscribing wit-
nesses cannot be had, evidence of their handwriting will suffice.
If two wills be found, and it do not appear which was the former, both will be
void; but where there is any date, the latter revokes the former.
90. ForM OF WILLS AND TESTAMENTS.
In the name of God, amen! I, A. B., of ——, in the —— of ——, merchant, being in
good health of body, and of sound and disposing mind and memory, do make and declare
this to be my last will and testament, in manner following, that is to say, I order that all
my just debts, funeral expenses and charges of proving this my will, be in the first place
fully paid and satisfied ; and after payment thereof, and every part thereof, I give and
bequeath to —— the sum of ——; I give and bequeath unto —— the sum of ——,, the
same to be paid him on his attaining the age of twenty-one years; I give and bequeath
unto —— the sum of ——, to be paid her at her attaining the age of twenty-one years
or day of marriage, which shall first happen. And all the rest, residue and remainder of
my goods, chattels, debts, ready money, effects and other my estate whatsoever and where-
soever, both real and personal, I give and bequeath the same and every part and parcel
thereof unto executors, administrators and assigns. And I do hereby nominate,
constitute and appoint of —— and of ——, executors of this my will, hereby
revoking and making void all former and other wills by me at any time heretofore made,
and declare this only to be my last will and testament. In witness whereof, I, the said
testator, have to this my last will and testament set my hand and seal, the day
of —~, a. p. 1880. [szau. ]
Signed, sealed, published and declared by the said testator as and for his last
will and testament, in the presence of us, who in his presence and at his request have
subscribed our names as witnesses thereto, A. B., C. D.
676 LAW FORMS
91, PREAMBLES TO WILLS.
A preamble to a will of a person in health..
In the name of God, amen! I, A. B., of, &c., being in good health of body and of
sound and disposing memory (praised be God for the same), and being desirous to settle
my worldly affairs, while I have strength and capacity so to do, do make and publish
this my last will and testament, hereby revoking and making void all former wills by me
at any time heretofore made; and first principally I commit my soul into ithe hands
of my Creator who gave it, and my body to the earth, to be interred in the burying-
ground of B——, &c., at the discretion of my executors hereinafter named ; and as to
such worldly estates wherewith it hath pleased God to intrast me.I dispose of the same
as followeth, Imprimis, &c.
A preamble to the will of a person that is sick and weak.
In the name of God, amen! I, A. B., of, &c., being sick and weak in body, but of
sound mind, memory and understanding (praised be God for it), considering the certainty
of death and the uncertainty of the time thereof, and to the end I may be the better pre-
pared to leave this world whenever it shall please God to call me hence, do therefore make
and declare this my last will and testament in manner following (that is to say): first
and principally, I commend my soul into the hands of Almighty God, my Creator, and as
to, &c.
Another preamble revoking all former wills.
Tuts is the last will and testament of me, A. B., made the —— day of , in the
year ——. I do hereby revoke all former wills by me at any time heretofore made, &e.
92. WILL BEQUEATHING PORTIONS TO SEVERAL CHILDREN AND CONTAINING AN APPOINTMENT
OF GUARDIANSHIP,
In the name of God, amen! I, A. B., of, &c., do make this my last will and testament
as follows (that is to say}: my desire is to be buried with as little expense as decency will
permit, and that all my debts and funeral expenses be paid as soon after my decease as
conveniently may be. I give and bequeath all my messuage, lands, tenements, and
hereditaments whatsoever, situate, lying and being in the county of, &c., other than, and
except all those three fields or closes of land, meadow or pasture lying and being &c.,
which I purchased of S. B., with their appurtenances, unto my dear wife, J. B., for and
during her life ; and from and after her decease I give and devise the same to my eldest
son W. B., and his heirs: And I give all the rents which shall be due and owing to me
at my death, for the aforesaid messuage, lands, tenements and hereditaments, hereinbefore
given to my said wife for life, and ah her death to my son W. and his heirs, unto my
said wife J. B., for her own use. I give and devise all and every one of my messuages,
lands, tenements and hereditaments whatsoever, which are situate, lying and being in
——, in the said county of C., with their appurtenances, to my son T. B. and his heirs,
charged and chargeable, nevertheless, with the annuity or yearly sum of ——, to be issu-
ing and payable out of the same messuages, lands, tenements and hereditaments to my
brother J. B., during his life, by two even and equal half-yearly payments, in every year,
the first of the said half-yearly payments to be made at the end of six calendar months
next after my decease. I give and bequeath to my said son T. all the rents that shall
be due and owing to me for the said last-mentioned messuages, lands, tenements and
hereditaments at my decease. I give and devise all the aforesaid three fields or closes of
land, meadow or pasture, which I purchased of the said S. B.,to my son H. B. and his heirs.
I also give to him, my said son H., all the rents which shall be due and owing to me for
the same at my death. I give all my household goods and furniture, plate, china-ware,
household linen, prints, pictures and household utensils in my house in —— aforesaid, and
my house in L. to my said wife for her own use. I also give to my said wife the sum of
$——,, to be paid to her as soon as it can conveniently be raised out of my effects, and
interest for the same, in the mean time, from the end of one calendar month next after my
decease, at the rate of $—— per cent. per annum. [ give to my son W. B., the like sum
of $——, and interest for the same, at the rate aforesaid, from the end of one calendar
month next after my decease. I give to my daughter H. B., to be paid to her within two
years next after my death, the like sum of $ , and interest for the same in the mean-
time, at the rate aforesaid, from the end of one calendar month next after my decease.
I give to my said son T. B., the sum of $——, to be paid to him when his present
articles of apprenticeship expire. I give to my daughter D. B., the sum of $—, to
be paid to her within four years next after my death, and interest for the same, in the
mean time, at the said rate of $—— per cent., from the end of one calendar month next
after my decease, to be paid to her guardian, during her infancy, and applied for her
maintenance during her minority. I give to my daughter M. L., the like sum of $—,
to be paid to her when she attains the age of twenty-one years, and interest for the
LAW FORMS. 677
game, in the mean time, at the said rate of $—— per cent., from the end of one cal-
endar month next after my decease, to be paid to her guardian, and applied for her
maintenance ee her minority. I give the sum of $——, and interest for the same,
at the said rate of per cent., from the end of one calendar month next after my
decease, unto Mr. R. Y., of, &., and Mr. T. C.'T., of, &c., their executors, adminis-
trators and assigns, upon the trust, to pay the interest of the said sum of $——, to my
daughter J. L., for her sole and separate use, during her life, exclusive of her husband,
and for which her receipt alone shall be a sufficient discharge, and from and after the
decease of my said daughter J. L., then as to the said sum o , in trust for her child
or children, living at her death; if more than one, equally to be divided between or
amongst them, share and share alike. Butif she shall not have a child living at her death,
then my will is that the said sum of $ shall sink into, and become, and be part of the
residue of my personal estate, And as to all the rest and residue of my personal estate
and effects whatsoever, which shall remain after payment of my debts and funeral
expenses, and the aforesaid specific and pecuniary legacies and interest, I give and
bequeath the same to my said son W. B., his executors and administrators. And I give
the custody, tuition and guardianship of the persons of such of my children as shall be
under the age of twenty-one years, at the time of my death, to my said wife J. B., during
their respective minorities. And I nominate and appoint my said wife executrix of this
my last will; and my will is, and I do hereby direct that all the rents of the messuages,
lands, tenements and hereditaments which are hereinbefore given to my said sons T. B.
and H. B., respectively, shall be paid to their guardians during their respective minori-
ties, and applied for their maintenance and support. In witness, &c.
93. WILL WHEREBY THE TESTATOR ORDERS HIS PERSONAL ESTATE TO BE APPRAISED AND
DIVIDED, &C., AFTER DEBTS, &C., PAID.
I will that all such just debts as shall be by me owing at my death, together with my
funeral expenses, and all charges touching the proving of, or otherwise concerning this
my will, shall, in the first place, out of my personal estate and effects, be fully paid and
satisfied ; and from and after payment thereof, and subject thereunto, then my will is,
that all the residue of my goods, chattels, merchandises and household furniture shall be
indifferently appraised, and after such appraisements made, that the same shall be divided
into three equal parts, one equal third part whereof I give and bequeath unto my loving
wife A; one other equal third part whereof I give and bequeath unto and amongst my
children B., C. and D. to be equally parted and divided amongst them share and share
alike, and to be paid and delivered unto my said sons at their several respective ages of
twenty-one years, and to my said daughter at her age of twenty-one years, or day
of her marriage, which shall first happen. And my will and meaning is, that in case
any of my said children shall depart this life before such time as the part or portion of
him, her or them so dying shall become payable, then, and in such case, the part or
portion of her or them, so dying, shall go and be equally divided amongst the survivor
or survivors at the time aforesaid. And as to the remaining third part thereof, I
will, give and bequeath the same as follows, viz.: I give and bequeath the same unto
my sons the said , equally to be divided amongst them share'and share alike, to be
_ paid, &c.; and I make and ordain E. T. and H. T. executors of this my last will and
testament, &.
[ 678 ]
Aewdness.
I. Provisions of the Penal Code. II. Judicial decisions.
1. Provisions or THE PENAL Cops.
If any person shall publish or sell any filthy and obscene libel, or shall expose to
sale, or exhibit, or sell any indecent, lewd and obscene print, painting or statue ; or if
any person shall keep and maintain any house, room or gallery, for the purpose of
exposing or exhibiting any lewd, indecent and obscene prints, pictures, paintings or
statues, and shall be convicted thereof, such perscn shall be sentenced to pay a fine not
exceeding five hundred dollars, and undergo an imprisonment not exceeding one
year. :
If any person shall bring or cause to be brought into this state for sale or exhibition,
or shall sell, lend, give away, or offer to give away, or show, or have in his, or her
possession, with intent to sell, or give away, or to exhibit, show, advertise, or other-
wise offer, for loan, gift, sale or distribution, any obscene or indecent book, magazine,
pamphlet, newspaper, story paper, writing, paper, picture, card, drawing or photograph,
or any article or instrument of indecent or immoral use, or shall design, copy, draw,
photograph, print, utter, publish, or otherwise prepare such book, picture, card, draw-
ing, paper, or other article, or shall write, or print, or cause to be written, or printed,
a circular advertisement, or notice of any kind, or give information orally, stating
when, where, how, or of whom, or by what means such an indecent or obscene article
or thing can be purchased, seen or obtained, shall in every such case be guilty of a
misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof, shall be sentenced to pay a fine, not ex-
ceeding five hundred dollars, and undergo an imprisonment, not exceeding one year:
Provided, That this section shall not apply to any persons giving information orally for
the purpose of procuring or furnishing evidence to convict under this act.?
Any person who shall sell, lend, give away, or show, or shall have in his possession,
with intent to sell, or give away, or to show, or shall advertise, or otherwise offer, for
loan, gift or distribution to any minor, any book, pamphlet, magazine, newspaper, or
other printed paper devoted to the publication or principally made up of criminal
news, police reports, or accounts of criminal deeds, or pictures and stories of deeds of
bloodshed, lust or crime, or shall exhibit on any street, or highway, or in any other
place within the view, or which may be within the view of any minor child, any book,
magazine, pamphlet, newspaper, writing, paper, picture, drawing, photograph, or other
article, or article coming within the description of articles mentioned in the first section
of this act, shall, in every such case be guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction
thereof, shall be sentenced to pay a fine, not exceeding five hundred dollars, and
undergo an imprisonment, not exceeding two years.
If any person shall, in a public place, or on any fence, or wall, or other surface con-
tiguous to the public street or highway, or on the floor, or ceiling, or on the inner or
outer wall, closet, room, passage, hall, or any part of any hotel, inn, or tavern, court-
house, church, school, station-house, depot for freight or passengers, capitol or other
buildings devoted or open to other or like public uses, or on the walls of any out-
buildings or other structures pertaining thereto, make or cause to be made any obscene
drawing, or picture, or obscene or indecent writing, or print, liable to be seen by others
passing, or coming near the same, such person so offending shall, in every such case,
be guilty of'a misdemeanor, and on conviction thereof, shall be sentenced to pay a fine,
1 Act 31 March 1860 240. Purd. 525, 5 Ibid. 2 2.
2 Act 6 May 1887 31. Ibid.
LEWDNESS. : 679
not exceeding five hundred dollars, and undergo an imprisonment, not to exceed one
year.
Any person or persons who shall put up in any public place any indecent, lewd or
obscene picture or character representing the human form in a nude or semi-nude con-
dition, or shall advertise by circulars or posters any indecent, lewd or immoral show,
play or representation, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and on conviction
thereof, shall be fined not less than twenty-five dollars, nor more than three hundred
dollars: Provided, That nothing in this act shall be so construed as to interfere with
the purely scientific works written on the subject of sexual physiology or works of art.?
If any person shall commit open lewdness, or any notorious act of public indecency,
tending to debauch the morals or manners of the people, such person shall be guilty
of a misdemeanor, and on conviction, be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding one
hundred dollars, or undergo an imprisonment not exceeding one year, or both, or
either, at the discretion of the court.®
It shall not be lawful to print or publish advertisements of medicines, drugs,
nostrums, or apparatus for the cure of secret or venereal diseases, or for the cure of
those diseases peculiarly appertaining to females; and if any person shall print or
publish, or procure to be printed or published, in any newspaper in this state, any
advertisements of medicines, drugs, or nostrums, or apparatus for the cure of secret
or venereal diseases, or for the cure of those diseases peculiarly appertaining to
females, or shall, by printing or writing, or in any other way, publish an account or
description of such medicines, drugs, nostrums or apparatus, or shall procure the same
to be published or written, or in any other way published, or shall circulate or dis-
tribute any such newspaper advertisement, writing or publication, every such person
so offending shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and shall, upon conviction thereof, be
fined in any sum not exceeding one thousand dollars, or be imprisoned in the county
jail, not exceeding six months, or both, at the discretion of the court.*
If any person shall print or publish, or cause to be printed or published, in any
newspaper in this state, any advertisement of any secret drug or nostrum purporting
to be for the use of females; or if any druggist or other person shall sell or keep for
sale, or shall give away any such secret drug or nostrum purporting to be for the use
of females, or if any person shall, by printing or writing, or in any other way, publish
an account or description of any drug, medicine, instrument or apparatus for the
purpose of preventing conception, or of procuring abortion or miscarriage, or shall,
by writing or printing, or any circular, newspaper, pamphlet or book, or in any other
way, publish or circulate any obscene notice, or shall, within this state, keep for sale
or gratuitous distribution, any secret drug, nostrum or medicine for the purpose of
preventing conception, procuring abortion or miscarriage, such person or persons, so
violating any of the provisions of this act, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor,
and shall, upon conviction thereof, be fined in any sum not exceeding one thousand
dollars, or be imprisoned in the county jail not exceeding six months, or both, at the
discretion of the court: Provided, That nothing in this act contained shall be construed
to affect teaching in regular chartered medical colleges, or the publication of standard
medical books.®
II. Any offence which, in its nature, and by its example, tends to the corruption of
morals, as the exhibition of an obscene picture, is indictable at common law. In an
indictment for exhibiting an obscene picture, it need not be averred, that the exhibi-
tion was public; if it be stated, that the picture was shown to sundry persons for
money, it is a sufficient averment of its publication. Nor is it necessary that the
postures and attitudes of the figures should be minutely described; it is enough, if the
picture be so described as to enable the jury to apply the evidence, and to judge
whether or not it is an indecent picture. Nor is it necessary to lay the house, in which
1 Act 6 May 1887 3 3. 4 Act 16 March 1870 31. Ibid. 524.
2 Tid. 3 4. 8 Ibid. 3 2.
8 Act 31 March 1860 344. Purd. 516.
680 7 LIBEL.
the picture is exhibited, to be a nudsance ; the offence not being a nuisance, but one
tending to the corruption of morals.
Ifa man indecently expose his person to a woman, and solicit her to have sexual
intercourse with him, and persist in doing so, notwithstanding her opposition and
remonstrance, this is an act of open lewdness, for which an indictment will lie.’
On the trial of an indictment for publishing an obscene libel, it does not matter
whether the things published be true, and in conformity with nature, and the laws of
our being, or not; if they are unfit to be published, and tend to inflame improper and
lewd passions, the offence is committed. To justify such a publication, the jury must
be satisfied, that it was made for a legitimate and useful purpose, and not from any
motive of mere gain, or with a corrupt desire to debauch society.
Lidel,
I, Constitutional provision respecting libels. III. Judicial authorities.
II. Provisions of the Penal Code. IV. A warrant for a libel.
I. THE printing press shall be free to every person who may undertake to examine
the proceedings of the legislature, or any branch of government, and no law shall
ever be made to restrain the right thereof. The free communication of thoughts and
opinions is-one of the invaluable rights of man ; and every citizen may freely speak,
write and print on any subject, being responsible for the abuse of that liberty. No
conviction shall be had, in any prosecutions for the publication of papers, relating
to the official conduct of officers, or men in public capacity, or to any other matter
proper for public investigation or information, where the fact that such publication
was not maliciously or negligently made, shall be established to the satisfaction of
the jury; and in all indictments for libels, the jury shall have the right to determine
the law and the facts, under the direction of the court, as in other cases.‘
This important section, short as it is, may be divided into two parts—the first is decla-
ratory, and the second, enactments founded on the rights previously declared. The
enactment clauses refer wholly to criminal proceedings, and have no reference to or
bearing upon civil actions brought for the recovery of damages; in such actions
the defendant is always allowed to give the truth in evidence. In criminal cases every
defendant, under this constitutional provision, who is charged with a libel for having
published anything “investigating the official conduct” of men in public stations, or
“ where the matter published is proper for public information,” has also a constitutional
right to give the truth in evidence.
II. Act 31 Marca 1860. Purd. 516.
Srcr. 24. If any person shall write, print, publish or exhibit any malicious or
defamatory libel, tending either to blacken the memory of one who is dead, or the
reputation of one who is alive, and thereby exposing him to public hatred, con-
tempt or ridicule, such person shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and on conviction,
be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars, or undergo an im-
prisonment not exceeding twelve months, or both, or either, at the discretion of the
court.
III. Libels, taken in their largest and most extensive sense, signify any writing,
pictures or the like, of an immoral and illegal tendency. Libels on individuals are
defined to be malicious defamations, expressed either in writing or by printed signs
and pictures, tending to blacken the memory of one that is dead, or the reputation
of one that is alive, and thereby exposing him to public hatred, contempt and
ridicule?
Any malicious printed slander which tends to expose a man to contempt, hatred
or degradation of character, is a libel. To print and publish that A. had been
1258. &R. 91. * Const. art I. 3 7.
2 18 Vt. 574. > 4 Bl. Com. 150.
3 8 Phila. 453.
LIBEL. 681
deprived of a participation of the chief ordinances of the church to which he
belonged, by reason of his infamous and scandalous assertions, is a libel.!
The communication of a libel to any one person is a publication in the eye of the
law, and, therefore, the sending an abusive private letter to a man is as much a
libel as if it were publicly printed, for it equally tends to a breach of the peace.?
For the same reason it is immaterial, at common law, with respect to the essence of a
libel, whether the matter be true or false, since the provocation and not the falsity
is the thing to be punished criminally?
Christianity is part of the law of Pennsylvania, and maliciously to revile it is a
criminal offence. It has long been firmly settled that blasphemy against the Deity
generally, or an attack against the Christian religion indirectly, for the purpose of
exposing its doctrine to ridicule or contempt, is indictable and punishable as a
temporal offence. The principle is, that the publication, whether written or oral,
must be malicious, and designed for that end and purpose.‘
Where a man publishes a writing which, upon the face of it is libellous, the law
presumes that he does so with that malicious intention which constitutes an offence,
and it is unnecessary on the part of the prosecution to give evidence of any circum-
stance from which malice may be inferred. In such case, it is incumbent upon the
defendant, if he seek to discharge himself from the consequences of the publica-
tion, to show that it was made under circumstances which justified it.
The constitution of 1874 has introduced an entirely new principle into the law
of libel, in this state, to wit, that where the matter complained of is proper for
publication, and it is established, that it was published without negligence or malice,
a criminal prosecution cannot be maintained.6 There must be proof of malice or
negligence to convict of a libel, when the publication relates to the official conduct
of persons in a public capacity.’ The legal inference of malice attaching to a
libellous publication, which is not privileged under the constitution, cannot be
rebutted by evidence; but if the alleged libel falls under the head of privileged
publications, the publisher thereof has the right, in a criminal prosecution, even if
his statements are untrue, to disprove malice and negligence. Where a communi-
cation is privileged, there must be proof of actual malice, to sustain a civil action.®
IV. A WARRANT FOR PUBLISHING A LIBEL.
COUNTY OF WESTMORELAND, ss.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To any Constable of the said county, greeting :
You are hereby commanded to take the body of A. B., if he be found in the said
county, and bring him before J. R., one of our justices of the peace in and for the
said county, to answer the commonwealth upon a charge, founded on the oath of C. D., of
having in a newspaper published in Greensburg, on the third of June inst., called the
“ Paul Pry,” published a false, scandalous and malicious libel, of and concerning the said
C.D., and further to be dealt with according to law. And for so doing this shall be your
warrant. Witness the said J. R., at Greensburg, who has hereunto set his hand
and seal, the eighth day of June, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and
eighty. J. R., Justice of the Peace. [sEat.]
If, on hearing, the justice shall be satisfied that a libel has been published, and pub-
lished by the defendant, he should bind him over to appear at the next court of quarter
sessions of the said county, and in default of bail commit him to the county prison. The
witnesses, as in all other cases where there is a binding over for trial, should be held in
recognisance tc testify.
15 Binn. 340. 17 W. N.C. 93. 6 11 Phila. 469. 7 Luz. L. Reg. 39, 44, And
24 Bl. Com, 150. see 11 Phila, 287.
3 Ibid. 151. 7 15 Phila. 368. And see 40 Leg. Int. 446.
4115S. & R. 394. 8 32 Pitts. L. J. 422. 14 Luz L. Reg. 437.
: 5 Roscoe C. L. 535. 17 W.N. 0.93. 43 Leg. 9% 17 W. N.C. 129.
nt, 36.
[ 682 ]
Lien.
I. Nature of a lien. II. How enforced.
I. A LIEN is simply a right at common law, to possess and retain property, until
some charge attaching to it be paid or discharged. It generally exists in favor of
artisans-and others, who have bestowed labor and service on the property in its
repair, improvement and preservation. It has also an existence in many other
cases, by the usages of trade. : :
There are two species of liens known to the law, namely, particular liens and
general liens. Particular liens are where persons claim a right to retain goods in
respect of labor and money expended upon them; and those liens are favored in
law. General liens are claimed in respect of a general balance of accounts; and
these are founded in custom only, and are therefore to be taken strictly.” It is not
to be doubted, that the law of particular or specified lien on goods in the hands of a
tradesman or artificer, for the work done on them, is a part of the common law of
Pennsylvania.*
A miller has a lien upon the corn ground by him ;* a shipright, upon a ship, for
repairs ;* a tailor, on the cloth delivered to and made up by him.® And, in
general, where a person bestows his labor upon a particular chattel delivered to him
in the course of his business, he has a lien upon such chattel for the amount of his
charge, whether there be an agreement for a stipulated price, or only an implied
contract to pay a reasonable price.’
A workman who bestows labor on a chattel for a stipulated sum, may detain the
chattel till the price be paid, although it be delivered at different times, if the work
to be done under the agreement be entire; otherwise, as it seems, where the par-
ties contract for a mode or time of payment inconsistent with the workmen’s claim
to the possession® A party cannot set up a right of lien which is at variance with
the terms or conditions, or implied understanding upon which he received the pro-
perty.? Under an entire contract for repairing several articles. for a gross sum, the
artisan has a lien upon any one or more of them in his possession, for the price of
his labor upon the whole.”
One who has the exclusive custody of a stock of goods of another, for the pur-
pose of carrying on the business of a retail store, and during its continuance
becomes personally liable, and pays for goods purchased to replenish the stock, does
not thereby acquire a lien on the goods to secure him against such liabilities and
advancements."
As an exclusive right to the possession of the thing is the basis of a lien, it exists
not in favor of a journeyman or day-laborer.? But since the passage of the act of
1863, a bailee may transfer the property, subject to his lien!® One having a lien
may relinquish it by his conduct.'*
Wharfingers have a lien on goods brought to their wharves, for the balance of a
general account.’© So, an attorney has a lien for his fees upon the money and papers
of his client, while they are in his hands.’
The evidence to establish a right of lien is either of an express agreement between
the parties in the particular instance, or is presumptive, being founded either
upon the mode of dealing between the same parties in former instances, or on the
general usage and custom of the particular trade.!?
Wherever the law has given a lien upon any goods or other things of value, then
1 Cross on Liens 2. 9 Addison on Contracts 1176.
2 Addison on Contracts 1175. 10 95 Penn. St. 345.
8 2W.& 5S. 395. 33 Penn. St. 151. lg W. 512.
4 ? M. & S. 180. 12:2 W. & S. 395.
5 4B. & Ald. 352, 18 58 Penn. St. 414.
63M. &&. 169, 4 Y. 456. And see 62 Penn. St. 242,
7 86 Penn. St. 486. 6 1 Esp. 109. And see 7 W. & S. 466.
85 Mo. & Scott 180. 47 Penn. St. 398. 55 1619 Penn. St. 99. 38 Thid, 231.
Ibid. 99. 7 Starkie’s Evid. 883.
LIEN. 683
the retaining of them shall not subject the person to an action of trover.! If pro-
perty be forcibly or clandestinely taken from the possession of one having a lien on
it, he may reclaim it as his property in an action of replevin, or in any other proper
form.?
[For the lien of common carriers, see Common Carriers. Lien of innkeepers, &c.,
see Inns and Taverns. Lien of judgments, see Judgment. For liens of mechanics
on buildings, see Mechanics’ Lien. ]
II. Aor 14 DecEMBER 1863. Purd. 1207.
Secr. 1. In all cases in which commission-merchants, factors and all common
carriers, or other persons, shall have a lien, under existing laws, upon any goods,
wares, merchandise or other property, for or on account of the costs ur expenses of
carriage, storage or labor bestowed on such goods, wares, merchandise or other pro-
perty, if the owner or consignee of the same shall fail or neglect or refuse to pay
the amount of charges upon any such property, goods, wares or merchandise, within
sixty days after demand thereof, made personally upon such owner or consignee,
then and in such case, it shall and may be lawful for any such commission-merchant,
factor, common carrier or other person having such lien as aforesaid, after the
expiration of said period of sixty days, to expose such goods, wares, merchandise or
other property to sale, at public auction, and to sell the same, or so much thereof
as shall be sufficient to discharge said lien, together with costs of sale and adver-
tising: Provided, That notice of such sale, together with the name of the person or
persons to whom such goods shall have been consigned, shall have been first pub-
lished, for three successive weeks, in a newspaper published in the county, and by
six written or printed handbills, put up in the most public and conspicuous places
in the vicinity of the depot where the said goods may be.
Sor. 2. Upon the application of any of the persons or corporations having a lien
upon goods, wares, merchandise or other property, as mentioned in the first section
of this act, verified by affidavit, to any of the judges of the courts-of common pleas of
this commonwealth, setting forth that the places of residence of the owner and con-
signee of any such goods, wares, merchandise or other property are unknown, or
that such goods, wares, merchandise or other property are of such perishable nature,
or so damaged, or showing any other cause that shall render it impracticable to give
the notice as provided for in the first section of this act, then and in such case, it
shall and may be lawful for a judge of the city or county in which the goods may
be, to make an order, to be by him signed, authorizing the sale of such goods, wares,
merchandise or other property, upon such terms as to notice as the nature of the
case may admit of, and to such judge shall seem meet: Provided, That in cases of
perishable property, the affidavit and proceedings required by this section may be
had before a justice of the peace.
Suc. 3. The residue of moneys, arising from any such sales, either under the
first or second sections of this act, after deducting the amount of the lien, as afore-
said, together with costs of advertising and sales, shall be held subject to the order
of the owner or owners of such property.
This act has altered the rule of the common law, which limited the lien of a
bailee for service to the duration of his actual possession.* But it does not authorize
a sale of unopened packages.‘
1 4 Burr. 2221. ® 68 Penn. dt. 414.
3 28 Penn. St. 193. 4 75 Ibid. 246. 9 Phila. 70.
[ 684 ]
Limitation of Actions.
L Limitation of personal actions. IV. Limitation of penal actions,
II. When the statute of limitations begins torun. V. Limitation of criminal prosecutions.
TIL What will remove the bar of the statute.
I. LIMITATION OF PERSONAL ACTIONS.
Limrrartron is a certain time assigned by statute, within which an action must
be brought.1. Statutes of limitation are statutes of repose, and are often the only
shield against a stale claim; and in this aspect, they are, in modern times, favored
by the courts. The statutes, in such case, bar the remedy. Whether founded on
presumption of payment, supposed loss of evidence, or the policy that would sup-
press litigation and promote repose, they are an express legislative offer to a defend-
ant of the means, not to extinguish his debt, but to defeat any action for its recovery.’
The period of limitation within which a personal action may be brought varies
according to the subject-matter. The following are the provisions of the Pennsyl-
vania statutes:
All actions upon the case, other than for slander or libel ; all actions for account,
other than such accounts as concern the trade of merchandise between merchant
and merchant, their factors and servants; all actions of debt grounded upon any
lending or contract, without specialty; all actions of debt for arrearages of rent;
all actions for trespass, detinue and replevin for goods and cattle, and actions of
trespass quare clausum fregit; shall be brought within six years next after the
cause of such actions or suits, and not after.’
All actions upon promissory notes shall be commenced within six years after the
cause of actions shall accrue, and not after.*
Actions upon refunding bonds must be brought within five years from their date.’
All actions of trespass, of assault, menace, battery, wounding, imprisonment, or
any of them, within two years next after the cause of such actions or suit, and not
after.
All actions of slander or libel, for words, whether spoken, written or printed,
within one year, and not after.”
The statutes also provide, that if the parties entitled to such actions, be, at the
time the cause of action shall accrue, within the age of twenty-one years, feme covert,
non compos mentis, imprisoned or beyond sea, they shall be at liberty to bring the
said actions, within the same period after the removal of such disabilities. The
statute of limitations does not run in favor of a defendant who is beyond sea, at the
time the cause of action accrued, but suit must be brought within the time limited
after the return of such defendant from beyond sea. And no plaintiff can take
advantage of this exception, except he be a citizen of the United States.®
It will be observed, that the limitation of six years is the only one that is appli-
cable to suits of which a magistrate has jurisdiction ; the cases enumerated in the
other clauses of the statute are cognisable only in the common pleas, and with them
a justice of the peace has no concern.
The limitation in actions of debt “ grounded upon any lending or contract without
specialty,” is confined to contracts in fact, and does not extend to a case where the
law gives an action of debt, though there be no contract between the parties” As,
debt on a foreign judgment; debt against a sheriff for an escape ;" debt on an
award ;” or on a devastavit.® It does not embrace a claim for a legacy; or for a
distributive share of an intestate’s estate ; nor to a widow’s claim for interest in
1 Termes de la Ley 417. 9135. & R. 399, 400. 1 W. N.C. 182.
322 Penn. St. 310. 13S. & R. 395,
3 Purd. 1213. 11 Thid. 400.
4Tbid. 1216. 1222 W.&S. 56. 64 Penn. St. 79.
§ Act 30 June 1885. Purd. 1216. 37 W. & S. 359. meres
6 Ibid. 1214. 42W.161. 5 Ibid. 225.
‘Ibid. 1215. 15 6 Ibid. 379,
8 Thid.
LIMITATION OF ACTIONS, 685
one-third of the purchase-money of her husband’s real estate, sold by an adminis-
trator ;} nor to express, continuing, technical trusts, not cognisable at law.? But
it is applicable to a claim against a decedent’s estate, presented to the orphans’
court, in the same manner as if the creditor had sued at law.
The statute is applicable between guardian and ward, after the latter comes of
age ;* to an action against a sheriff for moneys collected on an execution ;® or
against an attorney from the time his client had notice of the receipt of his money ;
or a knowledge of his negligence or breach of duty.6 And an action of debt for a
penalty due under a by-law, has been held to be within the act.7' It is the nature
of the cause of action, and not the form of action, which determines the applica-
bility of the statute.® :
The limitation in actions of debt for arrearages of rent does not apply to rent
reserved by deed? But it is provided by the act-of 1855, that where no payment,
claim or demand shall be made, on account of or for any ground-rent, annuity or
other charge upon real estate, for twenty-one years, and no declaration or acknow-
ledgment of the existence thereof shall have been made within that period, by the
owner of the premises, a release or extinguishment thereof shall be presumed, and
such ground-rent, annuity or charge shall thereafter be irrecoverable.
The exception of merchants’ accounts applies to actions of asswmpsit, as well as
actions of account; and it is not necessary in such case that any of the items
should come within the six years." To bring a case within this exception, there
must be mutual accounts between the parties ; and they must be open, not stated
accounts.’ Accounts between merchant and factor are within the exception.“ The
cases of what are termed mutual accounts, in which some of the items being within
six years are held to save the bar of the statute, seem referrible rather to the head’
of implied acknowledgment, than to the saving clause of merchants’ accounts.
The exception in favor of persons “beyond sea,” embraces only such as are
without the limits of the United States; a residence within another of the United
States is not sufficient to entitle a party to the benefits of this proviso." The excep-
tions in the statute in favor of persons under disabilities, apply to actions of assumpsit
on promissory notes and bills of exchange.”
Although debts secured by instruments under seal are specially excepted from
the operation of the statute of limitations, yet after a lapse of twenty years, a pre-
sumption of payment arises, which will bar a recovery, unless repelled by evidence.
After the lapse of twenty years, bonds and other specialties, merchants’ accounts,
mortgages, judgments, and indeed, all evidences of debt excepted out of the statute,
are presumed to be paid; and the computation runs from the period when the
money was demandable.!® This presumption, however, may be rebutted by proof of
a payment on account; of an acknowledgment of the existence of the debt; or
of the positive continuing insolvency of the debtor during the whole period that
has elapsed from the accruing of the plaintiff’s cause of action.”
By act of 25th April 1850, the statute of limitations does not run in favor of
insolvent corporations.”
14 W. 177. 381. 17 Ibid. 238.
2148.& R.394. 1 W. 271,514. 1W.&S. 82 Dall. 201. 2¥.105. 6 W. &S. 238-9. 7
‘118. 4 W.C. C. 631. Penn. St. 281. 5 Cr. 15. 6 Pet 151. 12 Ibid.
317 W.N. C.17, 33. The cases to the contrary
are overruled.
44W.&S, 557. 1 Edw. Ch. 343. If the claim
could have been enforced at law, the statute may
be pleaded in equity. 20 Johns. 576. 7 Johns.
Ch. 91. 1 Barb. Ch. 455. 3 Keyes 370. 27
Penn. St. 492.
5 9 Penn. St. 120.
6 7 Ibid. 27. 92 Ibid. 484.
7 16 Q. B. 765.
8 57 Penn. St. 126. And see 63 Ibid. 475.
10 Purd. 1211. See 45 Penn. St. 537, 5 Phila.
143. See act 26 February 1869, as to limitation
of claims for apportioned ground-rent.
111 Phila, 181. 5 Cr. 15.
12178.& R.347. 2W.& 8.137. 7 Penn. St.
300.
14 2 Y.105. As to whe one deemed merchants
within the statute, see 1 W. & §. 469. 2 Ibid. 139.
55 Penn. St. 260.
1617. & H. Pr. 3 556. See 6 T. R.189. 17
S. & R. 347. 85 Penn. St. 209. 105 Ibid. 307.
Ballantyne on Limitations 80-2.
162 Dall. 217. 1 ¥. 329. 958. & R. 288, 33
Penn. St. 360.
17 2 Whart. 152.
182 W.214. 1P.& W.420. The presumption
of payment applies to a judgment in foreign
attachment, in favor of the garnishee. 42 Leg.
Tnt 366.
19 2 Penn. St. 225, 481.
20 Purd. 1215.
686 LIMITATION OF ACTIONS.
II. WHEN THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS BEGINS TO RUN.
The statute of limitations commences running only from the time the right of
action accrues.! Thus, where the vendor of a house and lot which was subject to
a ground-rent, left in the hands of the vendees a portion of the purchase-money,
to be applied to the payment of arrears of ground-rent, the vendees agreeing to pay
them with it, and above sixteen years afterward, the vendor was sued for such
arrears and paid them, whereupon, within one year thereafter, he brought suit
against the vendees to recover the same, it was held, that his action was not barred
by the statute? And the statute will not be a bar to a recovery for work and labor
done, if the contract under which it was performed was not at an end more than
six years before the commencement of the action, although no actual labor was
done within the statutory period.? | :
In an action by an attorney for professional services in the collection of a debt,
the statute begins to run from the time of its payment,* if the relation of counsel
and client be dissolved; but until then, the statute does not commence to run
against an attorney’s bill for fees.> In an action against an attorney, from the time
of his collection of the client’s money; or of his negligence or breach of duty ;
unless the collection be fraudulently concealed. And so also it is, when a sheriff
collects money ;7 or defectively executes a writ ;* and if he ‘take insufficient bail, the
statute runs from the time when the action would have accrued against the bail.? So,
it runs in favor of officers, generally, from the breach of duty complained of ;° and
in favor of agents, generally, from the collection of money, or breach of duty.4
In an action for money lent by a wife to her husband out of her separate estate,
the statute commences running from the death of the husband.’ For money paid
on articles of agreement for the sale of land, from the refusal of the vendor to con-
vey.® And on a contract to complete certain work, from the time it was to have
been completed.™*
Where an overpayment has been made by mistake, and, on a final settlement,
the apparent balance is paid, the statute begins to run from the time of such final
settlement. On a parol guarantee of a mortgage, payable by instalments, from the
time the last instalment becomes due.’* In case of a continuing trust, from the time
some one is entitled to claim its execution.” In cases of constructive fraud, from
the commission of the act complained of, not from the date of its discovery.% And
in trover, from the time of conversion.
The time is not enlarged by a transfer of the claim.” And an agreement to
extend the period of limitation for a certain time, will not operate as a waiver of the
statute for another period of six years.” But it is to be observed, that in case of
fraud, the statute only runs from the time of its discovery.”
If, after a recovery by the plaintiff, the judgment be arrested, or reversed on
error, he may commence a new action, within one year thereafter.“ An abatement
of the first suit, by a plea of non-joinder of a partner, is within the equity of this
proviso.* So, where the suit abates by the death or marriage of the plaintiff. And
where a joint defendant dies, and the survivor is insolvent, the plaintiff has one
year to bring a new action against the executors of the decedent. But if the plain-
tiff be nonsuited after the expiration of the six years, the statute will bar another
action for the same cause.”
1148. & R.328. 39 Penn. St. 520. 51Ibid. 71. 143 P. & W. 48.
2 23 Penn. St. 88. 16 10 Penn. St. 455.
8 28 Ibid. 316. 16148. & R. 311.
44 W. 334. M1 Thid. 395. See 48 Penn. St. 518. 101 Ibid.
5 55 Penn. St. 434. The death of the client 299.
dissolves the relation; and from that time, the 18 15 Phila. 201.
statute runs against the attorney’s claim for ser- 19 Add.153-4. 1 P. & W.216. And see 3 A.
vices rendered in a pending action. 105 Penn. 381. 3 P. & W. 149.
Bt. 304. 20 2 R. 211.
61 W. 275. 24 Penn. St. 52. 48 Ibid. 624. 2 21 17 Penn. St. 244.
Gr. 273. And see 66 Penn. St. 192. 92 Ibid. 484, 2 4 ¥.109. 78. & R. 214, 235. 1 W. 110, 401.
7 9 Penn. St. 120. 8 Ibid. 12. 12 Penn. St. 49. 83 Ibid. 305, 416,
8 17 Mass. 60. 422. 87 Ibid. 100. 2 Gr. 273.
9 9 Met. 564, 23 Purd.1215,
10 6 Cow. 238. % 2 Penn. St. 382-5.
11W.&S8S.112. 24 Penn. St. 54. 25 Tbid. 385,
12158. & R. 84. 3 Whart. 48. 40 Penn. St.90. 9% 5 W. & S. 339.
MW1P. & W. 492, 12 Penn. St. 238. 2719. & R.A
LIMITATION OF ACTIONS. 687
If an act on the part of the creditor, such as demand, or notice, &c., be neces-
sary to complete his cause of action, such act must be done within six years from
the date of the contract, otherwise the plaintiff’s action will be barred by the
statute. Thus, the lapse of six years is a bar to an action by a railroad company
for a subscription to its capital stock, if no call be made within that period.?
The statute begins to run against a note payable on demand, from its date, and
no demand of payment is necessary before suit brought ;* but if a note be made pay-
able at a certain number of days after demand, or after sight, a demand is necessary
before suit brought, and the statute does not begin to run until the prescribed period
after demand, has elapsed.*
The issuing of a certiorari to review the judgment of a justice’s court, suspends
the running of the statute of limitation, during the time it is pending ; if the judg-
ment be reversed, and another suit brought, such period is not to be computed as
part of the time of limitation’
III. WHat WILL REMOVE THE BAR OF THE STATUTE.
In order to take a case out of the purview of the statute of limitations, the
plaintiff must show either an acknowledgment of the existence of the debt, or what
is equivalent to it, a part payment. An acknowledgment of the claim within six
years has always been held sufficient to take the case out of the statute. But such
acknowledgment must be clear, unambiguous and express; and so distinct and
palpable in its extent and form as to preclude hesitation ;7 it must specifically
refer to the instrument on which the claim is founded, and to the amount of indebt-
edness ;° it must be the acknowledgment of a séill existing indebtedness ;? and it
must be made to the plaintiff or his agent." An acknowledgment, however, and
offer to pay the principal of a debt, coupled with a refusal to pay the accrued
interest, is sufficient to take the principal out of the statute.” An acknowledgment
before the limitation expires is sufficient.”
An acknowledgment by an executor or administrators is not sufficient to remove
the bar of the statute ; nor one by the defendant’s attorney ;“ nor by one of
several joint-debtors, or by one of several partners, after the dissolution of the firm.”
A new promise by a joint-debtor will affect no one but himself.’
An indorsement of part payment, proved to have been made before the statute
had completed its bar, is sufficient to take the case out of the statute.” The con-
structive acknowledgment of a debt arising from part payment within six years
before suit brought, is sufficient from which to infer a promise to pay; but to have
this effect the part payment must be clearly established.* And part payment by a
liquidating partner is evidence of a new promise by his late copartners ; but part
payment by one of several joint-debtors, not partners at the time, will not take the
case out of the statute.”
A direction in a will that all the testator’s just debts be paid, will not revive a
debt barred by the statute of limitations ; or stop the running of it.” Nor will
a statement of the debt in a petition for the benefit of the insolvent laws have that
effect.
Tt seems, that it is proper, in all cases, to sue on the original contract, and not
on the subsequent acknowledgment as a new promise ; such acknowledgment is
1 84 Penn. St. 12. see 97 Penn. St. 322.
2 32 Ibid. 22, 25. 36 Ibid. 77. 11 29 Penn. St. 189. f
311 W. N. C. 294, 330. 3 Penny. 394. See 1 5 Ibid. 225. 9 Ibid. 259. 69 Thid, 311.
107 Penn. St. 336, 352. 13 1 Whart. 66. 7 W. 420. 12 Penn. St. 64.
43 Gr. 138. 835 Ibid. 250. 1 Gr. 268.
5 Purd. 1216. 42P. & W. 262. 1 Phila. 220.
698. & BR. 131. 11 Ibid. 13. 14 Ibid. 197. 417 S.& R.126. 1P.& W. 138 2 Am. L
95 Penn. St. 340. Reg. 572. 1 Wood. 182.
712 8.4&R. 393. 1 W. 271, 6 Ibid. 220. 9 16 1Gr. 268. 48 Penn. St. 248.
Ibid. 381. 10 Ibid. 172. 3 W. & 8.509. 6 Ibid. 171 W. & S. 243. 5 Ibid. 332. 6 Penn. St. 267.
217. 7 Ibid. 258, 9 Penn. St. 258. 14 Ibid. 275. 41 Ibid. 51. 64 Ibid. 69.
16 Ibid. 210. 54 Ibid. 152. 63 Ibid. 324. 82 18 26 Penn. St. 385.
Ibid. 83, 83 Ibid. 356. 199 3W. & 8. 345. 3 Gr. 302.
8 19 Penn. St. 388. 22 Ibid. 308, 23 Ibid. 413. 29 22 Penn. St. 156. 48 Ibid. 248. And see 46
35 Ibid, 259. 104 Ibid. 349, 356. 16 W.N.C. Ibid.310. 2 Penny. 154.
309, 21 1 Binn. 209.
9128. & R.307, 10 W.172. 59 Penn. St.487. 2 1 Phila. 463.
10 17 Penn, St, 286, 302. 12 W. N.C.106. And 10 Penn. St. 129. 1 Whart.106. 2M. 424.
688 LIMITATION OF ACTIONS.
but a waiver of the statutory defence.! To save the bar of the statute, the plaintiff
may reply a writ issued within six years; but he must show that it has been con-
tinued down to the time of hearing ;? and it is sufficient if the alias be issued
within six years after the original.’
The repeal of a statute of limitation which bars an action for a personal debt,
after the bar is complete, revives the right of action in the creditor ; though it is
otherwise, where the statute operates upon the title to real or personal property.‘
LV. LIMIratION OF PENAL ACTIONS.
The act 26th March 1785 provides, that “all actions, suits, bills, indictments
or informations, which shall be brought for any forfeiture upon any penal act of
assembly made or to be made, whereby the forfeiture is or shall be limited to the
commonwealth only, shall hereafter be brought within two years after the offence
was committed, and at no time afterwards; and all actions, suits, bills or informa-
tions, which shall be brought for any forfeiture upon any penal act of assembly
made or to be made, the benefit or suit whereof is or shall be by the said act
limited to the commonwealth, and to any person or persons that shall prosecute in
that behalf, shall be brought by any person or persons that may lawfully sue for the
same, within one year next after the offence was committed; and in default of such
pursuit, then the same shall be brought for the commonwealth, at any time within
one year after that year ended ; and if any action, suit, bill, indictment, or informa-
tion shall be brought after the time so limited, the same shall be void ; and where
a shorter time is limited by any act of assembly, the prosecution shall be within
that time.’”
By the act 21st April 1841,° the provisions of this section are extended to actions
for the penalty for issuing small notes; by the act 16th July 1842,” it is extended
to actions for all fines, forfeitures and amercements which, by law, are directed to
be paid to the treasurers or county commissioners of the respective counties, for the
use of the counties ; and by act 24th February 1845,° to all fines and forfeitures,
payable either in whole or in part, to the use of the respective counties.
The twenty per cent. interest, imposed asa penalty for the issuing of notes of a
less denomination than five dollars, by the act 12th April 1828 is not a forfeiture,
within the meaning of the act of 1785; nor are the damages on protested bills of
exchange?
The act of 1785 is a defence to all penalties under the 47th section of the act
16th April 1850, relating to banks, which accrued more than two years before suit
brought.
Y. LIMITATION OF CRIMINAL PROSECUTIONS.
The 77th section of the revised Code of Criminal Procedure, passed the 31st
March 1861, enacts that “all indictments which shall hereafter be brought or
exhibited for any crime or misdemeanor, murder and voluntary manslaughter
excepted, shall be brought or exhibited within the time and limitation thereafter
-expressed, and not after; that is to say, all indictments and prosecutions for trea-
son, arson, sodomy, buggery, robbery, burglary, perjury, counterfeiting, forgery,
uttering or publishing any bank-note, check or draft, knowing the same to be
counterfeited or forged, shall be brought or exhibited within five years next after
the offence shall have been committed; and all indictments and prosecutions for
other felonies, not named or excepted theretofore in that section, and for all misde-
meanors, perjury excepted, shall be brought or exhibited within two years next
after such felony or misdemeanor shall have been committed: Provided, however,
That if the person against whom such indictment shall be brought or exhibited,
shall not have been an inhabitant of this state, or usual resident therein, during the
said respective terms for which he shall be subject and liable to prosecution as
aforesaid, then such indictment shall or may be brought or exhibited against such
1 22 Penn. St. 310. 47 Ibid. 333. 97 Ibid. 322. 6 Purd, 1217,
26 W. 529. T Tbid.
8 15 Penn. St. 293. 28 Ibid. 261. 8 Ibid. 1218,
4115 U.S. 620. 9 14 Penn. St. 86-7. 7 Leg. Int. 150.
6 Purd. 1217. : 10 26 Penn. St. 451.
LOTTERIES. 689
person at any period within a similar space of time during which he shall be an in-
habitant of, or usually resident within this state: And provided also, That indict-
ments for misdemeanors committed by any officer of a bank or other corporation, may
be commenced and prosecuted at any time within six years from the time the alleged
offence shall have been committed.’’?
The limitation in cases of forgery, whether it be a misdemeanor or a felony, is five
years? And prosecutions against officers of corporations or quasi corporations, for
misdemeanors committed by them, are to be prosecuted within four years.®
In cases of embezzlement by administrators, &c., the limitation is five years.*
The exception of cases of perjury in the act of 1860, includes subornation of perjury.®
The limitation need not be specially pleaded; it may be taken advantage of on the
general issue.© The finding of an informal presentment, is not sufficient to take the
case out of the statute ;7 nor will a former indictment in which a nolle prosequi was
entered. But it is not necessary that the case be prosecuted to judgment within the
two years: it is sufficient if the indictment be brought into court and exhibited to the
notice of the defendant.’?
Potteries.
I. Provisions of the Penal Code. II. Judicial decisions.
I. Act 31 Marcu 1860. Purd. 517.
Sot, 52. All lotteries, whether public or private, for moneys, goods, wares or mer-
chandise, chattels, lands, tenements, hereditaments or other matters or things whatso-
ever, are hereby declared to be common nuisances; and every grant, bargain, sale,
conveyance or transfer of any goods or chattels, lands, tenements, or hereditaments
which shall be made in pursuance of any such lottery, is hereby declared to be invalid
and void.
Sxcr. 53. If any person shall, within this state, either publicly or privately, erect,
set up, open, make or draw any such lottery as aforesaid, or be in any way concerned
in the managing, conducting or carrying on the same, he shall be guilty of a misde-
meanor, and, on conviction, be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding one thousand
dollars, and undergo an imprisonment, by separate or solitary confinement at labor,
not exceeding one year.
Sect. 54. If any person shall sell, or expose to sale, or cause to be sold or exposed
to sale, or shall barter or exchange, or cause or offer to be bartered or exchanged, or
shall advertise, or cause to be advertised, for sale, barter or exchange, any lottery-
ticket, or share, or any part thereof, or any lottery policy or any writing, certificate,
bill, token or other device purporting or intending to entitle, or represented as en-
titling, the holder or bearer, or any other person, to any prize to be drawn in any lot-
tery, or any part of such prize, or any interest therein, or shall, in any newspaper,
magazine or periodical owned or controlled by him, publish or cause to be published,
any advertisement of any lottery-ticket, share, policy, writing, certificate, bill, token or
device aforesaid, or of any lottery drawing or lottery scheme, or any prospectus
scheme, or other advertisement of any company, association, corporation, partnership,
individual or individuals conducting, managing or controlling any lottery, or acting as
agent therefor: such person shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and on conviction, be
sentenced to an imprisonment, by separate and solitary confinement at labor, not ex-
ceeding two years, and to pay a fine, not exceeding one thousand dollars, or both, or
either, at the discretion of the court. The purchaser of such ticket, policy or device
shall not be liable to any prosecution or penalty, by virtue of this or any other law of
1 Purd, 1218. 6 98 Penn. St. 259. See 3 Cr. 0.0. 442. Ibid.
7Tbid. 1219. 38, 60, 368. ,
3 Tbid. 1218. 71 Cr. C. C. 485.
4 Act 23 April 1889. Purd. 1219. 8 3 MeLean 469.
52 L. Law Rev. 314. 91 Brewst. 329.
44
690 MAGISTRATES’ COURTS.
the commonwealth, and shall, in all respects, be a competent witness to prove the
offence. Any indictment under this act shall be deemed and adjudged good and suffi-
cient, which describes the offence in the words of this law, although it does not set out
the name or location of such lottery, nor set out in words or figures the ticket, policy
or device sold, bartered or exchanged, or offered or advertised to be sold, bartered or
exchanged.!
By the act 2 April 1870 (Purd. 518) the 73d section of the penal code of 31 March
1860 (Purd. 524), which punishes public nuisances, is extended to any person who
may be legally indicted for selling tickets or policies in any unlawful lottery.
II. A plan or arrangement whereby land or houses divided into lots of unequal
value is distributed by chance among the purchasers of tickets or certificates, such
purchasers having had no previous interest in the lands or houses, it is a lottery, and
prohibited by law.? So also, an annual distribution, by lot, among the members of an
art-union, of works of art purchased by their subscriptions, is a lottery.* So is the sale
of “ prize candy,’’* or a gift concert.®
A lottery is a scheme for the distribution of prizes by chance. The mere determi-
nation of questions, by lot, where there is no distribution of prizes by chance, does
not constitute a lottery, within the meaning of the act.®
Lottery tickets come under the denomination of “‘ goods, wares and merchandise,”
and the price or value of them, if not illegal, may be recovered in the common counts
for goods sold and delivered.’ But a contract of purchase of a prize lottery ticket,
the sale of which was prohibited by law, cannot be enforced by action, nor will the
purchaser be entitled to recover in an action for money had and received, upon proof
that the seller of the ticket received the amount of the prize-money.® It is other-
wise, where the ticket was purchased in another state, whose laws legalized the
sale.?
A witness may be compelled to answer whether he has purchased lottery tickets
from the defendant.”
Magistrates’ Courts
Of Philadelphia.
Act 5 Fresruary 1875. Purd. 1281.
Sect. 1. There are hereby established in Philadelphia twenty-four courts, not of
record, of police and civil causes, with jurisdiction not exceeding one hundred dol-
lars, and additional courts shall be established, from time to time, so as to provide
one such court for each thirty thousand inhabitants of said city; each of such
courts shall be held by one magistrate, whose term of office shall be five years.
And it shall be the duty of the councils of the city of Philadelphia, on or before
the first day of March, Anno Domini 1875, and on or before the first day of January
of every fifth year thereafter, and whenever else it may be necessary, to fix the
general location of each of the said courts, by declaring between which streets or roads
« shall be, so as to be most convenient for suitors and for the despatch of the public
usiness. s
Szcr. 2. The said courts shall be numbered in regular numerical order, and shall be
severally styled ‘‘ Magistrate’s Court, number ——,’’ and shall be located by their
numbers by the councils of said city.
Sect. 3. The said magistrates’ courts shall have a seal, with the coat of arms of
a amended by act 13 June 1883. Purd. 72 Whart. 155,
anes 5 aw, & 8. 181.
. ‘ 13 Penn. St. 328. See 94 Ibid. 7
; toe 228. And see 21 Hun 466, 10 Bright. 109, E a
ila. 203. 65 Barb. 432, 56 N. Y. 424. 1 There can be no increase in the number of
512 Abb. Pr. (N. 8.) 210. courts, without legislative action. 16 W. N, C.
6 8 Phila. 457. 485.
~
MAGISTRATES’ COURTS. 691
the state of Pennsylvania engraved thereon, and for legend “ Magistrate’s Court,
number , of the city of Philadelphia,” inserting the number of the court in
said legend.t
Ssor. 4. The qualified electors of said city at large shall, on the third Tuesday
of February 1875, elect, on general ticket, as many magistrates as there are courts
in said city, and no more, who shall hold their offices for the term of tive years from
the first Monday of April next succeeding their election, if they shall so long behave
themselves well; and in the election of said magistrates no voter shall vote for
more than two-thirds of the number of persons to be elected, when more than (two)
are to be chosen; said magistrates shall be voted for on a separate ticket, to be
headed “ magistrates,” Thereafter, the election of magistrates shall take place at
the time fixed for the election of municipal officers in said city, immediately pre-
ceding the expiration of the term of any magistrate. The said magistrates shall
be at least twenty-five years of age, and shall have resided, for at least one year imme-
diately preceding their election, in the city of Philadelphia, and shall be qualified
voters thereof. No magistrate shall practise as an attorney-at-law in any court in
this commonwealth, or elsewhere, during his term of office.
Secr. 5. After the city councils have located the said courts by numbers, and
betore said magistrates shall enter upon the discharge of their duties, they shall
assemble in the presence of the mayor of the city of Philadelphia, and draw lots, in
the order of the alphabetical rotation of their surnames, for the right to choose
which of the courts so located shall be held by each; and when they shall have all
drawn lots, the magistrate who shall have the first choice shal] choose, from the
whole number of courts, which court he desires to select as his court, and the num-
ber and location of the court chosen by him shall be the court which he shall hold
until the expiration of his term of office. After the magistrate having the first
choice shall have selected his court, the magistrate having the second choice shall
proceed to select his court in the same manner, and so on, until all the magistrates
shall have selected their courts, in the order of the lots drawn by them. The
councils shall not change the localities of the respective courts, during the terms
for which the said magistrates shall have been elected ;? and thereafter, at the expi-
ration of the term of five years for which the said magistrates have been elected,
their successors shall be elected and select their courts in the manner hereinbefore ,
set forth.
Szcr. 6. After the magistrates have selected their courts as aforesaid, it shall be
the duty of the mayor of the said city, to certify to the governor of the common-
wealth [in], the names of the several magistrates, with the number of the court
selected by each; and the governor shall forthwith commission each of the said mag-
istrates as of the court chosen by each ; which commission shall be duly recorded
in the office for the recording of deeds for the city and county of Philadelphia.
Scr. 7. Before entering upon the discharge of his duties, each of said mag-
istrates shall take and subscribe the following oath, before one of the judges
of the court of common pleas for the county of Philadelphia: ‘I do solemnly
swear (or affirm) that J will support, obey and defend the constitution of the United
States and the constitution of this commonwealth, and that I will discharge the
duties of my office with fidelity ; that I have not paid or contributed, or promised to
pay or contribute, either directly or indirectly, any money, or other valuable thing,
to procure my nomination or election (or appointment), except for necessary and
proper expenses expressly authorized by law ; that I have not knowingly violated
any election law of this commonwealth, or procured it to be done by others in my
behalf ; that I will not knowingly receive, directly or indirectly, any money or other
valuable thing for the performance or non-performance of any act or duty pertaining
to my office, other than the compensation allowed by law.” And they and each of
them shall give bond in the sum of three thousand dollars, with two or more sufli-
cient sureties, who shall be freeholders, and approved by one of the judges of the
courts of common pleas of said county ; which bond shall be taken by the prothono-
tary of said court, in the name of the commonwealth, with conditions for the faithful
performance of his duties and proper application of all moneys that shall come into
his hands as such magistrate ; and such bond shall be held in trust for the benefit
1 The act 1 February 1887, provides for four additional courts. 211 W.N. C. 63.
692 MAGISTRATES’ COURTS.
of all persons who may sustain injury from said magistrate in his official capacity ;
and said sureties shall in no case be liable, unless proceedings be commenced
within six years from the time such cause of action shall accrue; and said bond
shall forthwith be recorded in the’ said office for recording deeds. Copies of the
record of any such bond, recorded as aforesaid, and duly certified by the recorder
of deeds for the time being, shall be good evidence in any action brought against
the obligors, according to its form and effect, in the same manner as the original
would be, if produced and offered in evidence. : .
Sect. 8. The said magistrates shall be paid by the said city for their services ;}
and to cover the expenses for rent of a suitable place in which to hold said court .
(to be selected by the magistrates of said courts respectively), and for the dockets,
blank books, legal blanks and stationery, for the use of said magistrates’ courts, a
salary of three thousand dollars per annum, to be paid in quarterly payments on the
first Monday of July, October, January and April, in each and every year; and it
shall be the duty of the councils of said city to appropriate annually a sufficient
sum to pay said salaries; and the said dockets, blank books and legal blanks shall
be uniform in character.
Sect. 9. Should any vacancy happen in the office of magistrate, either by death,
resignation, disqualification, removal or otherwise, said vacancy shall be filled for the
full term of five years, in the manner hereinbefore set forth, at the next succeed-
ing municipal election held in said city after said vacancy shall happen ; and it
shall be the duty of the governor inthe meantime to appoint and commission a
suitable person to fill said vacancy until the first Monday of April next succeeding
the first municipal election after said vacancy shall happen; Provided, however,
That if said vacancy shall happen within twenty days before any municipal elec-
tion, said vacancy shall not be filled until the second succeeding municipal election
thereafter ; and the governor shall appoint and commission a suitable person to
fill said vacancy until the firs; Monday of April after said second municipal
election.
Szor. 10. In case any of said magistrates shall, from sickness or any other cause,
be unable to attend his court for more than twenty days, one of the other magis-
trates having the nearest court, shall have the power to take charge of all suits or
proceedings before him, and conduct the same during his absence.
Seor. 11. A civil and a criminal docket shall be kept in each of said courts by
the magistrate holding the same, in which shall be entered daily all proceedings of
said court ; and it shall be the duty of the magistrate receiving any costs, fees,
fines, penalties or other moneys, to note the same in the margin of the proper
docket, opposite to the entry of the case in respect to which the same is received,
with the date at which, and the name of the person from whom, the same was
received, together with the date when and the person to whom the same was paid ;
said docket shall be open to the inspection of any citizen, during the hours when
the court is required to be kept open; it shall also be the duty of each of the said
magistrates to keep a day-book, in which he shall enter all costs, fees, fines and
penalties collected by him, with the date when, the person from whom, and the
purpose for which the same was received; he shall also note therein the time
when, and the manner in which the same is disposed of ; and the books and papers
of said courts, including said day-books, shall be the property of the common-
wealth of Pennsylvania.
Sxcr. 12. They shall pay over to the city treasurer, within five days after the
first Monday of every month, all costs of suits, fees, fines, penalties and other sums
of money received, excepting constables’ fees, which shall be paid said constables
directly by said magistrates, during the preceding month, except such costs and
judgments as the parties to any proceeding before them may be by law entitled to
receive, and shall, at the same time, furnish to the controller of said city, under oath
or affirmation, an accurate account of all moneys so paid either into the city treas-
ury or the said constables ; and the controller of said city shall not countersign any
warrant for the quarterly payment of the salary of any magistrate, until he is
1 In case of a contest, the officer de jure is of his opponent having received the return.
entitled to the salary, on a final decision as to his W.N. F. y Thid. 136. enema Ne
right, though he had not qualified, in consequence !
- MAGISTRATES’ COURTS, 693
satisfied, from inspection by himself or deputy, of the dockets, day-book, or other
books of said magistrate, that the said accounts are correct ; and if the said books
are incorrectly kept, or the said accounts are inaccurate, the said magistrate so
defaulting shall be guilty of a misdemeanor in office, and shall be liable to removal
from office.’
Szcr. 13. The jurisdiction of each of said magistrates shall extend throughout
the city and county of Philadelphia, and they shall be, by virtue of their office, ea
officio justices of the peace ; they shall have all the powers and shall exercise the
same jurisdiction, civil and criminal (except as herein otherwise provided), as is
now by law exercised by aldermen of said city, and shall be liable to the same limit-
ations and restrictions, pains and penalties, that are now imposed upon aldermen by
the laws of this commonwealth. Where by law two aldermen are now required to
hear and determine any matter brought before them, the same jurisdiction shall be
exercised by one magistrate.
Secor. 14. In all cases of summary conviction before said magistrates, either party
may appeal to the court of quarter sessions of said county, upon the allowance of
any judge thereof, upon cause shown ; and either party may also appeal from the
judgment of said magistrates, in a suit for a penalty, to the court of common pleas
of said county, upon the allowance of any of the judges thereof, upon cause shown :
Provided, however, That this enactment shall not affect any right of appeal under
existing laws.
Sect. 15. It shall be the duty of the aldermen of the city of Philadelphia, whose
terms of office shall have expired upon the thirty-first day of December, Anno
Domini 1874, or that may thereafter expire, or whenever they shall vacate their
office after that time, to hand over to the magistrate whose court is located
nearest his office, all dockets, notes, bonds and other papers connected with his
office, as well as the dockets and papers of all other aldermen which may be in
his possession; and every alderman who shall refuse or neglect, for the term
of thirty days after he has vacated his office, to deliver said books and papers as
aforesaid, shall be subject to a penalty of one hundred dollars, to be recovered
as penalties of like amounts are now recoverable ; and in case of the death or con-
tinued absence of any alderman for the term of three months, all persons having pos-
session of the books and papers aforesaid of said deceased or absent alderman, shall
deliver said books and papers to said magistrate, in like manner as aldermen are
required to do by this act, and shall be subject to the same penalties for neglect
or refusal; and the said magistrate shall, in like manner and subject to the same
penalties, from time to time, hand over the said books and papers to their succes-
sors in office.
Sect. 16. And in any case of neglect or refusal to deliver all books and papers
as aforesaid, the said alderman and other persons shall be compelled to deliver said
books and papers as aforesaid, by decree and attachment against them, which may
be made and issued by any court of common pleas of said county, or by any judge
thereof in vacation, on application being made thereof by any person. And the
said magistrate to whom said books and papers are delivered, shall have power to
issue process and proceed thereon with like effect as said aldermen or magistrates
might have done had they continued in office: Provided, That in case the magis-
trates to whom such books and papers may be delivered shall be a party to or
interested in any suit or judgment therein, such suit or judgment shall be proceeded
in by some other magistrate in said city, to whom a transcript shall be furnished, as
well as the original docket, if required on the trial. badass
Sxor. 17. Hach magistrate shall select from the constables in commission in the
city of Philadelphia, such number, not exceeding three, as shall be necessary to
the prompt service of process and the efficient performance of all other duties: of
constable ;? they shall hold their office at the pleasure of the magistrate, shall give
bond in manner and form as now required by law, and be subject to all liabilities
and restrictions, have all the powers, and perform all the duties, now by law attached
to the office of constable in the city of Philadelphia. Hach of said constables shall
be paid monthly, by the city of Philadelphia, the aggregate amount of fees which
1 So amended, by act 1 June 1881 Purd. 1285, 2 See 11 Phila, 391.
694 MAGISTRATES’ COURTS.
shall be certified to be due and payable to him by the magistrate of his court:
Provided, The same shall not exceed the amount of constables’ fees actually paid
to the city treasurer as hereinbefore provided. : :
Szor. 18. The said magistrates shall, from time to time, select from among their
number, such magistrates as shall be necessary to act as committing magistrates at
the several police stations in the city of Philadelphia, and in doing s0, they shall
in all cases assign magistrates to duty at the station or stations which shall be
most convenient to the place where their courts are held. No magistrate shall
receive any additional compensation for acting as committing magistrate at any
police station, raeie .
Sxor. 19. Said magistrates’ courts shall be open from nine o clock in the morn-
ing until four o’clock in the afternoon of each and every juridical day: Provided,
however, That said magistrates may issue process and hear causes at any time.
Magistrates’ Courts.
IN SECOND CLASS CITIES.
Act 16 JUNE 1891. Purd. 1286. ‘i
Sect. 1. All police magistrates in all cities of the second class in this commonwealth
shall have full and complete jurisdiction, power and authority to receive and take
criminal informations, on oath or affirmation of and subscribed to by the affiant,
accusing any person or persons of the commission of any felony or misdemeanor,
where such felony or misdemeanor has been committed within the corporate limits
‘of the city in which such police magistrate resides and is appointed, and to issue
warrants for the arrest of such persons so accused, administer oaths and hold pre-
liminary hearings in all such cases, and commit to jail, or bind over for trial at
the next term of the proper court of the proper county, or discharge such accused
person or persons, as the evidence produced at such hearing or hearings may
warrant.
Sct. 2. In all cases the person or persons so accused of any felony or misdemeanor,
shall be admitted to bail by one or more sufficient sureties to be taken before the
police magistrate before whom such information may be made as aforesaid, or
before any judge, justice, mayor, recorder or alderman, where the offence charged
has been committed, except such persons as are precluded from being bailed by the
constitution of this commonwealth: Provided also, That persons accused as afore-
said of murder or manslaughter, shall only be admitted to bail by the supreme
court or one of the judges thereof, or a president or the judges of the court of
oyer and terminer and quarter sessions of the peace; persons so accused as afore-
said of arson, rape, mayhem, sodomy, buggary, robbery or burglary shall only
be bailable by the supreme court, or any of the judges of the court of oyer
and terminer and quarter sessions of the peace, or the mayor or recorder of such
city.
Scr. 3. The said police magistrate shall likewise have full and complete power,
jurisdiction and authority to administer oaths and examine witnesses, and hear, deter-
mine and punish, according to the laws and ordinances of such city, all cases of arrest
upon view, or upon information made and warrant issued, by the police of the city in
which such police magistrate may reside or be appointed, of all persons who may be
found engaged in or be charged with drunkenness, disorderly conduct, selling liquor
contrary to law, maintaining a disorderly house or bawdy-house, lewd, indecent or
lascivious behavior on the streets or elsewhere, gambling, creating riots or disturbances,
vagrants, beggars, prostitutes, disturbers of the public peace, known or reputed pick-
pockets, burglars, thieves, watch stuffers, cheating, swindling, persons who abuse their
families, and suspicious persons who can give no reasonable account of themselves, or
violating any of the laws or ordinances of such city.
Sect. 4. The said police magistrates shall likewise have full and complete jurisdic-
tion of suits for the recovery of fincs and penalties imposed by any and all ordinances
MALICIOUS MISCHIEF. 695
of the city in which they reside and are appointed, and of all cases of summary con-
victions arising under the laws and ordinances of such city, with full power to hear
the said cases, administer oaths or affirmations therein, decide the same, enforce the
penalty, collect the fine or commit to prison as the case may be according to the pro-
visions of the law and ordinances applicable thereto.
Sect. 5. It shall and may be lawful for any such police magistrate, where vagrants
shall be found within the city in which such police magistrate resides or is appointed,
to commit such vagrants (being thereof legally convicted before him on his own view,
or by the confession of such offenders, or by the oath or affirmation of one or more
credible witnesses) to the workhouse of the county within which such city is situate,
if such there be, otherwise to the common jail of such county, there to be kept at
hard labor by the keeper of such workhouse or jail for any time not less than thirty
days nor more than six months.
TOTS
Malicious Mischict.
I. Malicious mischief at common law. IV. Warrant for destroying a sign.
II. Provisions of the Penal Code. V. Warrant for removing a land-mark.
III. Malicious trespass.
I. Maticrous mischief, in this country, as a common-law offence, has received a
far more extended interpretation than has been attached to itin England. In its
general application, it may be defined to be any malicious or mischievous injury,
either to the rights of another, or to those of the public in general. Thus it has
been considered an offence at common law, to destroy a boat belonging to another ;
or a horse or a cow; or any beast whatever which may be the property of another ;
to be guilty of wanton cruelty to animals in general ; to cast the carcass of an avimal
in a well in daily use ; to poison chickens ; fraudulently tear up a promissory note ; or
maliciously break windows; to mischievously set fire to a number of barrels of
tar belonging to another ; to girdle or otherwise maliciously injure trees kept either
for use or ornament ; to put cow-itch on a towel, with intent to injure a person about
to use it; to break up a boat; to cut off the hair of the tail or mane of a horse,
when done maliciously ; to discharge a gun, with the intention of annoying or
injuring a sick person in the immediate vicinity ; and to break into a room with
violence, for the same purpose.’
II. PROVISIONS OF THE PENAL CODE.
If any person shall wilfully and maliciously put, place, cast or throw upon or
across any railroad, any wood, stone or other matter or thing; or shall wilfully and
maliciously take up, remove or displace any rail, sleeper or other matter or thing
belonging to any railroad; or shall wilfully and maliciously turn, move or divert
any switch or other machinery belonging to any railroad; or shall wilfully and
maliciously make or show, hide or remove any signal or light upon or near any rail-
road; or shall wilfully and maliciously do, or cause to be done, any other matter or
thing, with intent, in any of the cases afvresaid, to obstruct, upset, overthrow, injure
or destroy any tender, carriage, car or truck used on such railroad, or lo endanger
the safety of any person travelling or being upon such railroad ; every such offender
shall be guilty of felony, and being thereof convicted, shall be sentenced to pay a
fine not exceeding ten thousand dollars, and to undergo an imprisonment, by sepa-
rate or solitary confinement, at labor, not exceeding ten years.”
If any person shall wilfully and maliciously cast, throw or cause to fall or strike
against, into or upon any engine, tender, carriage, car or truck used upon any rail-
road, any wood or stone, or other matter or thing, with intent to endanger the safety
of any person being in or upon such engine, tender, carriage, car or truck, every
such offender shall be guilty of misdemeanor, and being thereof convicted, shall be
1 Whart. Cr. L. 3 2002. 14 Luz. L. Reg. 164. malicious mischief. 14 W. N. C. 106
Bat the breaking of a chair is not indictableas 2 Act 31 March 1840 3 142. Purd. 534,
696 MALICIOUS MISCHIEF.
sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars, and to undergo an
imprisonment not exceeding three years."
If any person shall wilfully and maliciously break, throw down, level or destroy the
whole or any part of any lock, sluice, flood-gate, bank, waste-wier, dam, aqueduct, cul-
vert, bridge, feeder, guard-wall, towing-path or berme-bank belonging to any artificial
navigation, or stop up or obstruct any such feeder, waste-wier, aqueduct or culvert,
such person shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and, on conviction, be sentenced to
pay a fine not exceeding one hundred dollars, and undergo an imprisonment, by
separate or solitary confinement, or by simple imprisonment, at labor, not exceeding
three years.’
‘If any person shall wantonly open or shut, or cause to be opened or shut, any
lock or safety-gate, or any wicket, paddle or culvert gate, or any waste, feeder or
sluice gate, or drive any nails, spikes, pins or wedges into any such gate or fixtures
thereof, or shall take any other means to prevent the perfect and free use of the
same, or shall wantonly and maliciously break, throw down or destroy any fence,
wall or timber work on any canal, pool, feeder or other part of any artificial naviga-
tion ; or if any person shall wilfully obstruct the navigation of any canal or pool, by
throwing into the same, or sinking to the bottom thereof, any vessel, timber, stone,
earth or other thing, or by placing anything whatever upon any towing-paths; such
person shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and, on conviction, be sentenced to pay a
fine not exceeding one hundred dollars, and undergo an imprisonment not exceed-
ing three calendar months.
If any person shall unlawfully and maliciously break down or cut down the bank
or wall of any river, canal or marsh, whereby any land shall be overflowed or dam-
aged, or be in danger thereof, such person shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and
being thereof convicted, be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding one hundred dol-
lars, and to undergo an imprisonment not exceeding one year.*
If any person shall unlawfully and maliciously break, injure or otherwise
destroy or damage any part of any locomotive or stationary engine, inclined plane,
engine-house, station or depot, bridge, culvert, trussel work or other building or
structure belonging to any railroad, or any other part of such railroad; or shall
wantonly and maliciously derange or displace the fixtures or machinery of an
locomotive or stationary engine used or employed on any railroad; or shall wilfully
and maliciously destroy or injure any fence or wall, cross road passing over or
under such railroad; or shall unlawfully and maliciously break, injure or other-
wise destroy or damage any of the posts, wires or other materials or fixtures
employed in the construction and use in any line of an electrical telegraph, or
shall wilfully and maliciously interfere with such structure so erected, or in any
way attempt to lead from its uses or make use of the electrical current, or any por-
tion thereof, properly belonging to and in use, or in readiness to be made use of, for
the purpose of communicating telegraphically from one station of a telegraph com-
pany to an another established station of the same, or a connecting telegraph
line; or shall unlawfully and maliciously break, injure or otherwise destroy or dam-
age any bridge, river or meadow bank or mill-dam ; or wilfully and maliciously take
down, injure, remove or in any wanner damage or destroy any flag, flag-staff, beacon,
buoy or other way or water marks, which now are or hereafter may be put, erected
or placed by lawful authority, near or in any streams that are or may be declared
public highways; or shall unlawfully and maliciously cut, break or otherwise
destroy any lead, tin, copper or iron spout affixed to any house or other building,
public or private; or shall unlawfully and maliciously daub, paint or otherwise
deface any dwelling-house, such offender shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and,
upon conviction be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars,
and undergo an imprisonment not exceeding twelve months, or both, or either, at
the, discretion of the court.
If any person shall wilfully and maliciously break, injure or destroy any window
or door belonging to any dwelling-house or out-house, parcel thereof; or shall unlaw-
fally and maliciously break or take off from the door any knocker or bell-pull, ot
1 Act 31 March 1860 3 143, Purd. 534, * Thid. 3146, Purd. 521. § 1 1879,
2 Thid. ; 144. Purd. 521, Purd. sa = ey ee
®Tbid. ¢ 145, 5 Act 31 March 1860 2147. Purd. 521.
MALICIOUS MISCHIEF. 697
plate inscribed with the name of the occupant or number of the house; or shall
wilfully and maliciously destroy, take down, injure or deface any sign, put up by an
inhabitant to denote the place of his abode, occupation, business or employment,
such person shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and, upon conviction, shall be sen-
tenced to pay a fine not exceeding one hundred dollars, or suffer an imprisonment
not exceeding six months, or both, or either, at the discretion of the court.
If any person shall wilfully and maliciously break down any tree or shrub grow-
ing on the public grounds as inclosed on capitol hill, or otherwise injure or destroy
the same, or shall break or destroy the fence around such inclosure, or any part
thereof, or shall maliciously and wilfully injure any part of the public grounds, or
the building belonging to the state; or if any person shall wilfully or maliciously
injure or destroy any fruit or ornamental trees, shrub, plant or grape-vines growing
or cultivated in any orchard, garden or close, or upon any public street or square
in this commonwealth; he shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and, on conviction, be
fined not exceeding one hundred dollars, and undergo an imprisonment not exceeding
six months, or both, or either, at the discretion of the court.”
If any person shall unlawfully and maliciously cause any water to be conveyed
into any mine, or into any subterraneous passage communicating therewith, with
intent thereby to destroy or damage such mine, or to hinder or delay the working
thereof, or shall, with the like intent, unlawfully and maliciously pull down, fill up
or obstruct any air-way, water-way, drain, pit, level or shaft of or belonging to any
mine, such offender, his aiders and abettors, shall, on conviction thereof, be sen-
tenced to pay a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars, and undergo an imprison-
ment not exceeding two years.*
If any person shall wilfully and maliciously cut, injure or destroy, or deface
any hose or engine, or any apparatus appertaining to the same, belonging to any
fire-engine or hose company, he shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and, on con-
viction, be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars, and to undergo
an imprisonment, by separate or solitary confinement, at labor, not exceeding three
ears.* :
: If any person shall cut down or fell any timber tree or trees, knowing the
same to be growing or standing upon the lands of another person, without the con-
sent of the owner; or if any person shall purchase or receive any timber tree
or trees, knowing the same to have been cut or removed from the lands of
another, without the consent of the owner thereof; or who shall purchase or
receive any planks, boards, staves, shingles or other lumber, made from such timber
tree or trees, so as aforesaid cut or removed, knowing the same to have beén so
made; the person so offending shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and, being thereof
convicted, shall be sentenced to pay such fine, not exceeding one thousand dollars,
or to such imprisonment, not exceeding one year, as the court, in their discretion,
may think proper to impose.®
If any person shall knowingly and maliciously cut, fell, alter or remove any cer-
tain bounded tree, or other allowed landmark, to the wrong of his neighbor or any
other person, he shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and, on conviction, be sentenced
to pay a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars, and to undergo an imprisonment
not exceeding une year.® . . :
Every person who shall wilfully and maliciously kill, maim or disfigure any
horses, cattle or other domestic animals of another person, or shall wilfully and
maliciously administer poison to any such beasts, or expose any poisonous substance,
with intent that the same should be taken or swallowed by them, shall be guilty of
a misdemeanor, and being thereof convicted, shall be sentenced to pay a fine not
exceeding five hundred dollars, and to undergo an imprisonment, by separate or
solitary confinement, at labor, not exceeding three years.’
1 Act 31 March 1860 2 148. Purd. 522, who was the owner. Ibid. 506. See 33 Penn.
3 Thid. 2 149. St. 489. 76 Ibid. 59. Timber trees are such as
8 Ibid. 3 150. . are used not only for building purposes, but in
4 Thid. 2 151. the mechanical arts. Lewis’ Cr. L. 506. See
5 Ibid. 3152. This section extends as well to 1 Madd. Ch. 140n. 7 Johns. 233. As to the form
unseated as to seated lands. 12 Penn. St. 195. of indictment, see 7 Penn. St. 439. 4 Clark 306.
Possession under claim of title is enough. 1 Bro. 4 Am. L. J. 130.
App’x 25. A tenant under a lessee for years may 6 Act 31 March 1860 3 153. Purd. 523.
be described as owner. Lewis’ Cr. L. 505. And 7 Ibid. 3 154. Purd. 489.
itia nnnerassarv to nrove thatthe defendant knew
698 MALICIOUS MISCHIEF.
If any person shall, unlawfully and maliciously, destroy or damage anything kept
for the purpose of art, science or literature, or as an object of curiosity, in any
museum, gallery, cabinet, library or other repository, which museum, gallery, cabi-
net, library or other repository, is either, at all times, or from time to time, open for
the admission of the public, or any considerable number of persons to view the
same, either by the permission of the proprietor thereof or by payment of money for
entering the same; or any picture, statue, monument or painted glass in any church,
meeting-house or other place of religious worship, or any statue or monument
exposed to public view; such person shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and, being
convicted thereof, shall be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding five hundred dol-
lars, and to undergo an imprisonment not exceeding six months.’ ;
If any officer, clerk, agent, or member of any publie library, duly incorporated
under the laws of this commonwealth, or any other person whatever, shall hereafter
wilfully cut, mutilate or otherwise injure any book, volume, map, chart, magazine,
newspaper, painting, engraving or statuary belonging to, or deposited in any public
library, museum or gallery, so incorporated as aforesaid, or in any department of
this commonwealth, shall procure such injury to be done, as herein stated, every
such person shall be deemed to be guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction
thereof, by any court of competent jurisdiction, shall be liable for each offence, to
a fine of not more than one hundred dollars, or imprisonment in the county jail,
not exceeding three months, or both, or either, at the discretion of the court; more-
over, he shall be liable to make good the said damage, or injury to said institution,
in addition to aforesaid fine and imprisonment: Provided, however, That no prose-
cution shall be maintained under this act, unless the library prosecuting shall have
at least two printed copies of this act conspicuously placed upon its premises.”
Any baggage-master, express-agent, stage-driver, hackman or other person, whose
duty it is to handle, remove or take care of the baggage of passengers, who shall,
wilfully or recklessly, injure or destroy any trunk, valise, box, package or parcel,
while loading, transporting, unloading, delivering or storing the same, shall be guilty
of a misdemeanor, and on conviction thereof shall be sentenced to pay a fine not
exceeding one hundred dollars: Provided, That the provisions of this act shall
not be so construed as to release railroad or other transportation companies from
their liabilities under existing laws.?
If any person or persons shall maliciously or wantonly break or throw down any
post and rail, or other fence, erected for the inclosure of land, or shall carry away,
break or destroy any post, rail or other material, of which such fence was built,
inclosing any lots or fields within the commonwealth, such person or persons so
offending shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and on conviction, shall be sentenced to
pay a fine not exceeding fifty dollars, one-half thereof to be paid to the informer, on
conviction of the offender or offenders, the other half to the support of the poor of
such county, township, borough or ward where the offence has been committed, with
costs of prosecution, or to undergo an imprisonment not exceeding six months, or
both, or either, at the discretion of the court.‘
Any person or persons who shall, wilfully and maliciously, destroy, mutilate,
injure, pluck off, deface or remove therefrom, any tree or trees, vines, flowers, grass
or ornamental shrubbery, growing, being or temporarily placed therein, for orna-
mental or useful purposes, in any cemetery or grave-yard in this commonwealth,
used for the interment of human beings, or shall wilfully trespass in and upon pri-
vate inclosures in any cemetery or grave-yard aforesaid, shall be guilty of a misde-
meanor, and on conviction of any said offences, be sentenced to undergo an
imprisonment, not exceeding one year, or to pay a fine of not exceeding one hundred
dollars ($100), or both or either, at the discretion of the court.
Any person or persons who shall, maliciously, after the passage of this act, break
down, destroy or remove, or in any manner whatsoever injure, impair or damage, in
whole or in part, any rip-rap, wall, dam, bank or breakwater, built or formed or
composed of stone, cinders or other materials, along property fronting or abutting
on any river or stream within this commonwealth, or who shall remove, carry away
1 Act 31 March 1860 3155. Purd. 518, 4 Act 23 March 1865, Purd. 519.
2 Act 23 June 1885. Purd. 518. 5 Act 19 May 1879. Purd. 482.
8 Act 12 February 1870. Purd. 478.
MALICIOUS MISCHIEF. 699
or tear up any stones, cinders or other materials of which such rip-rap, wall, dam,
bank or breakwater shall be in whole or in part composed, shall be deemed guilty of
a misdemeanor, and shall on conviction thereof, in the court of quarter sessions
of the county in which the offence shall have been committed, be fined, for each
offence, not exceeding two hundred dollars, or imprisonment in the county jail or
work-house, not exceeding six months: Provided, That prosecutions under this act
shall be begun within two years from the time of the commission of the offence:
And provided further, That the provisions of this act shall not apply to counties
having a population of over five hundred thousand inhabitants.
If any person shall, wilfully and maliciously, injure any well sunk for the produc-
tion of oil, or gas, or water, or any tank intended or used for the storage of oil, or
gas, or water, or any line of pipe intended or used for the transportation of oil,
or gas, or water, or any machinery connected with such wells, tanks or lines of
pipe, he shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon being thereof convicted, shall
besentenced to pay a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars, and undergo imprison-
ment, not exceeding three years, or both, or either, at the discretion of the court.?
III. Maticiovs TRESPASS.
The wilful taking and carrying away of fruit, vegetables, plants, fruit or orna-
mental trees, vines or shrubs, * * * whether attached to the soil or not, shall be
deemed, and the same is hereby declared a misdemeanor, and may be prosecuted
and punished as such, under the laws of this commonwealth ; and on conviction
thereof, in the court of quarter sessions of said county, shall be fined, not exceed-
ing fifty dollars, and imprisoned, not exceeding sixty days; such fine or penalty
to be appropriated as provided in the second section of this act.*
Any person or persons who shall wilfully enter or break down, through or over
any orchard, garden or yard-fence, hot-bed or green-house; or who shall wrongfully
club, stone, cut, break, bark or otherwise mutilate or damage any nut, fruit or
ornamental tree, shrub, bush, plant or vine, trellis, arbor, hot-bed, hot or green-
house ; or who shall wilfully trespass upon, walk over, beat down, trample or in
anywise injure any grain, grass, vines, vegetables or other growing crop; shall and
may, on conviction thereof, before any alderman or justice of the peace, or in any
court of law in said counties, have judgment against him, her or them, in a sum
not Jess than five, nor more than one hundred dollars, with costs of suit; one-half
the damage or penalty to go to the use of the informer, the other half of the damage
or penalty to the occupant or owner of the premises on which the said trespass
shall or may be committed; and in default of payment of said fine or judgment,
with costs of suit, the party convicted may and shall be committed to the jail of
said county, for not less than twenty, nor more than sixty days; said complaint or
action to be in the name of the commonwealth, and the testimony of the owner
or occupant of the premises shall be admitted as evidence to prove the trespass and
damage sustained: Provided, That when the owner of the premises shall become
the informant, then one-half of the penalty shall be appropriated to the school
fund of the district in which the trespass was committed.*
No person shall place in any fresh-water stream, lake or pond, without the con-
sent of the owner, or in shore-waters aud estuaries, with the rivers debouching into
them, any lime or other deleterious substance, with the intent to injure fish, or any
drug or medicated bait, with intent thereby to poison or catch fish, nor place in a
pond or lake, stocked and inhabited by trout or black-bass, any drug or other dele-
terious substance, with intent to destroy such trout or bass, nor place in any fresh-
water pond or stream, stocked with brook-trout, any pike, pickerel, black-bass or
rock-bass, or other piscivorous fish (salmon excepted), without the consent of the
owner or owners of such lands upon which such pond or stream is situated ;
any person violating the provisions of this section shall be deemed guilty of a mis-
demeanor, and shall, in addition thereto, and in addition to any damage he may
have done, be liable to a penalty of one hundred dollars.®
If any person or corporation shall mine or dig out any coal, iron or other minerals,
1 Act 19 May 1879, Purd. 521. was a local one, but was extended throughout the
2 Act 23 June 1885. Purd. 522. state, by act 17 April 1861. Pamph. 322.
8 Act 30 March 1860 21. Purd. 519. 5 Act 24 May 187127. Purd. 928.
*Thid. 22. This statute, as originally passed,
700 MALICIOUS MISCHIEF.
knowing the same to be upon the lands of another person or corporation, without the
consent of the owner, the person or corporation so offending shall be guilty of a mis-
demeanor; and being thereof convicted, shall be sentenced to pay such fine, not ex-
ceeding one thousand dollars, or to such imprisonment, not exceeding one year, as to
the court in their discretion may think proper to impose. And the person or corpora-
tion so offending, shall be further liable to pay to such owner double the value of said
coal, iron or other materials (minerals) so mined, dug out or removed, or in case of
the conversion of the same to the use of such offender or offenders, treble the value
thereof, to be recovered, with costs of suit, by action of trespass or trover, as the case
may be; and no prosecution by indictment under this act shall be a bar to such ac-
tion: Provided, That the provisions of this act shall not apply to persons picking
coal for their own domestic use.1
If any person or person shall, without the consent of the owner or owners thereof,
wilfully daub, paint advertisements, or post placards upon, or otherwise deface, the
walls of any building or buildings, house or houses, or the fences around the yard or
yards connected therewith, or any fences surrounding or inclosing any vacant lot or
lots, farm or farms, or shall cause the same to be done by others, or if any person or
persons shall, without the consent of the owner or owners thereof, daub, paint adver-
tisements, or post placards upon, or otherwise deface, any tree or trees, or shall
cause the same to be done by others, such offender or offenders shall be guilty of a
misdemeanor, and upon conviction be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding twenty-
five dollars, and undergo an imprisonment not exceeding thirty days, or both, or either,
at the discretion of the court.”
Any person found guilty of mutilating, destroying, tearing down or removing any
show-bill, placard, programme, poster or other advertisement posted up on any wall,
fence, bill-board or other structure in or located on any public highway, in the city of
Philadelphia and county of Centre, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and
upon conviction, shall be fined not less than twenty-five, nor more than one hundred
dollars for the first offence ; upon conviction for a second offence, the penalty shall be
imprisonment in the county jail for a period of not less than three, nor more than six
months: Provided, The penalties of this act shall not apply to those tearing down or
removing show-bills, play-bills, posters, programmes, &c., after the performance
therein advertised, or to the owner or tenant of any building, fence or other structure
upon which the said show-bills, play-bills, programmes, &c., may be posted, against
his or their wishes, save and except such owner or tenant be the bill-poster putting up
or employed to put up said show-bills, play-bills, posters, programmes, &.; in such
case the penalty shall be as in the first and second offences. All fines collected under
and by virtue of this act shall be paid into the state treasury.’
Any person found guilty of wilfully and maliciously mutilating, destroying, tearing
down or removing any show-bill, placard, programme, poster or other advertisement,
posted upon any rail, fence, bill-board or other structure, in or located upon any public
highway, in this commonwealth, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon
conviction shall be fined not less than twenty-five dollars nor more than one hundred
dollars: Provided, The penalties of this act shall not apply to those tearing down or
removing show-bills, play-bills, posters, programmes, after the performance therein
advertised, or to the owner or tenant of any building, fence or other structure, when
the same has been posted or put up without his or their consent, except such owner or
tenant be the bill-poster putting up or employed to put up the same.*
1 Act 8 May 187631. Purd. 522, 3 Act 2 April 1869. Ibid.
2 Act 8 June 1881 31. Ibid. 479. * Act 6 May 1887. Ibid.
MALICIOUS MISCHIEF. 701
Any person or persons who shall wilfully enter or break down, through or over any
field, orchard, garden or yard, fence, hot-bed or green-house, or who shall wrongfully
club, stone, cut, break, bark or otherwise mutilate or damage any field-crop, nut, fruit
or ornamental tree, shrub, bush, plant or vine, trellis, arbor, hot-bed, hot or green-
house, or who shall trample, or in any wise injure, any grain, grass, vines, vegetables,
or other growing crop, or who shall wilfully take or carry away any grain, corn, rye,
wheat or other field-crop, fruit, vegetables, plants, fruit or ornamental trees, vines or
shrubs, whether the same be attached to the soil or not, shall subject said person or
persons to a penalty of not less than five, nor more than fifty dollars, for each and
every offence.’
Any justice of the peace or alderman, upon information or complaint made before
him, by the affidavit of one or more persons, of the violation of said act by any person
or persons, shall issue his warrant, directed to any constable or police officer, to cause
such person or persons to be arrested and brought before said justice or alderman,
who shall hear and determine the guilt or innocence of such person or persons so
charged, and if convicted of said offence or offences, shall be sentenced to pay the said
penalty aforesaid, attached to said violations, with costs, one-half to go to the party or
parties injured, to pay for damages sustained, and the remaining one-half to the
school fund of the district in which said offence was committed: Provided, That the
defendant or defendants, on refusing to pay at once said penalty, shall be committed to
the common jail of the said county, for a period of not less than one day for each
dollar of penalty imposed, unless the defendant or defendants enter in a recognisance,
with good security, to answer said complaint, on a charge of misdemeanor, before the
quarter sessions of the peace of the county in which the offence is committed ; which
court, on conviction of the offence so charged, and failure to pay the penalty im-
posed by this act with costs, shall commit said defendant or defendants to the
common jail of the county, for a period not less than one day for each dollar of
penalty imposed.”
Whenever hereafter any bailee or bailees for hire, or loan of any property of any
livery-stable keeper, shall wilfully or with gross negligence, damage or destroy the
property of any one as aforesaid; while the same is in the custody or possession of
said bailee or bailees, the person or persons so offending shall be taken and deemed
guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction in the court of quarter sessions, shall be
punished by a fine, not exceeding one hundred dollars, or imprisonment, not exceed-
ing twenty days, in the county jail, or both, at the discretion of the court, and shall
be liable to said owner or owners of said property for the value thereof, or the injury
done to the same, in an action of debt, either in the court of common pleas or before
a justice of the peace, as like amounts are now by law recoverable.*
If any person or persons shall unlawfully, wilfully or recklessly injure or deface any
statue or monument now erected, or which may hereafter be erected, by the authority
of or within the commonwealth, or shall in like manner alter, deface, add to or change
any of the inscriptions upon any such statue or monument, such person or persons
shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon being convicted thereof, shall be
sentenced to pay a fine, not exceeding five hundred dollars, or undergo imprisonment,
not exceeding one year, or either, or both, in the discretion of the court.*
1 Act 8 June 1881 31. Purd. 520. 3 Act 22 March 1887. Purd. 519.
2 Thid. 2 2. 4 Act 9 May 1889. Ibid.
702 MALICIOUS PROSECUTION.
IV. WARRANT FOR DESTROYING A SIGN.
CITY OF PITTSBURGH, ss.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To any Constable of the said city, greeting:
You are hereby commanded to take the body of A. B., if he be found in the said city,
and bring him before J. R., one of our aldermen in and for the said city, to answer the
commonwealth upon a charge, founded on the oath of C. D., of having, on the night of
the 8th of May 1869, taken down, broken and destroyed, a wooden sign, which had been
put up by the said C. D., to denote his place of abode and his business as an innkeeper,
contrary to the act of assembly in such case made and provided, and further to be dealt
with according to law. And for so doing this shall be your warrant. Witness the said
J. R., at Pittsburgh, who hath hereunto set his hand and seal, the ninth day of May
1885. J.R., Alderman. [seat.]
V. WARRANT FOR REMOVING A LANDMARK.
DAUPHIN COUNTY, ss.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To the Constable of the township of S——, in the county of Dauphin, greeting :
Wueruas, J. L.,.of the township of S—, in the county of Dauphin, yeoman, hath
this day made oath before J. P., Esquire, one of our justices of the peace in and for said
county, that J. D., of the said township, tailor, did cut down and remove a certain black-
oak tree [or “did remove « certain heap of stones,” as the case may be], being an
allowed landmark between the Jand of the said J. L., and the land of the said J. D.
These are therefore to require you to take the said J. D., and bring him before the said
J. P. forthwith, to answer the complaint. Witness the said J. P., at S—— township
aforesaid, the sixth day of July, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and
eighty-five. J. P., Justice of the Peace. [szat.]
——=
Malicious Prosecution.
AN action of malicions prosecution will lie where a criminal prosecution: was
commenced, although no indictment was preferred to the grand jury.!
Demanding excessive bail, although the plaintiff has a well-founded cause of
action, or holding to bail, when the plaintiff has no cause of action, if done for the
purpose of vexation, entitles the party aggrieved to an action for a malicious prose-
cution.?
In order to support this action, au injury and damage to the plaintiff must be
proved, and it must be proved that the injury and damage were occasioned by some
malicious act of the defendant, and the malice may be inferred from the circum-
stances.» To support an action for a malicious prosecution, both malice and the
want of probable cause must be established against the defendant.‘
In a civil suit, the existence of a cause of action is not a defence to a suit for an
excessive abuse of process. But in criminal proceedings, want of probable cause
must be combined with malice.
Probable cause is a reasonable ground of suspicion, supported by circumstances
sufficiently strong in themselves to warrant a cautious man in the belief that the
person accused is guilty of the offence with which he is charged.®
The question of malice is to be decided by the jury. Probable cause is a mixed
question of law and fact; what circumstances are sufficient to prove probable cause,
is to be judged by the court; whether the circumstances which amount to probable
cause are proved, is a question for the jury.’ In an action for a malicious prosecu-
tion, the question of probable cause should be submitted to the jury, not upon the
fact of the guilt or innocence of the plaintiff, but upon the defendant’s belief of his
guilt or innocence ®
14.507. And sco Bright. 131. ® 14 Pon. St. 369. 24 Ibid. 212, 52 Ibid. 219
2 Pot. 0. 6.210. 1 P. & W. 232. 1 Bright. 494, 1 Penn. St. 234 ?
845. & R. 19-23. Thid. 338. PEE ee Eee
43 W.C. 0.21. 63 Penn. St, 234, 85 W. & 8. 438,
68 W. 240,
MARKETS, 703
If the prosecution, though without probable cause, was instituted under an error
of judgment, and without malice, the action cannot be sustained’ And if the party
had probable cause, it fully justifies him, however malicious his motives may have
been.?
If two or more persons conspire to prosecute an innocent man, upon a criminal
charge, it becomes an offence against the Penal Code, punishable with fine and
imprisonment.* And although the conspirators may succeed in procuring the con-
viction of the accused, before a competent tribunal, this but aggravates the offence,
and is no bar to an indictment against those who by such combination have procured
the conviction, The judgment of a court, obtained by corrupt testimony, may
be controverted in a proceeding against those who have been guilty of a fraudulent
combination to produce it.‘
To bring a civil action, though groundless, is not actionable ;> but if one abuse
the process of the law, as by maliciously holding to bail, an action lies; so, wantonly
to levy a second execution, after a former levy, or for a larger sum than is due, or
after the debt has been paid, have been held actionable; for all these are illegal,
and damage is thereby sustained.®
The fact that the prosecutor acted under the advice of counsel, is sufficient proof
of probable cause, unless it is shown that he made the resort to counsel a mere
cloak for his malice." So, if he acted bond fide, under the advice of a justice of
the peace, after a fair and full disclosure of all the circumstances.8
For causing a person to be arrested on a criminal warrant, charging an act which
is not a crime, the proper remedy is an action of trespass ; for such arrest is not an
abuse of lawful process ; it is an act committed under a void and irregular writ,
every step of which is unlawful.® And all concerned in such arrest are, in law,
trespassers.?
Markets.
[See ADULTERATION AND SALE OF UNWHOLESOME PROVISIONS. |
I. Statutes. II. Judicial decisions.
I. Aot 6 Aprit 1802. Purd. 1294.
Scr. 1. It shall and may be lawful for any person or persons to sell or expose to
sale provisions, vegetables or fruit, in the markets of any city, borough or corporate
town within this commonwealth: Provided always, That such provisions, vegeta-
bles or fruit shall not have been previously purchased within the limits of such
city, borough or corporate town. ,
Act 7 May 1855. Purd, 1294.
Sor. 1. It shall not be lawful for any butcher or other person to expose for sale
any tainted or unwholesome meat or fish, or any veal less than three weeks old
when killed, in any of the market-houses or other places for vending meat in any
of the cities or boroughs in the several counties of this commonwealth, under a
penalty of ten dollars for each offence, to be recovered as other penalties are recover-
able, before any alderman or justice of the peace, one-half of said penalty to go to
the informer, and the other half for the benefit of the poor.
II. Every municipal corporation which has power to make by-laws and establish
ordinances to promote the general welfare and preserve the peace of a town or city,
may fix the times and places of holding public markets for the sale of food, and
make such other regulations concerning them, as may conduce to the public interest.4
1 Bright. 494. 7 33-Penn. St. 501. 25 Ibid. 275. 1 Phila. 19.
24W.&S.517. 1 Penn. St. 234, 8 10 Phila. 409. 1 Chest. Co. R. 323. 39 Leg.
3 Purd. 483. Int. 188. See 94 Penn. St. 329.
4 2 Pars. 367. Fost. C, L. 130-1. § 30 Penn. St. 344. 32 Ibid. 168. 50 Ibid. 495.
5 Pet. 0. C. 210. 10 32 Ibid. 169. See 51 Ibid. 158.
645,&R.19. 10 W. 118 24 Penn. St. 212, 1 33 Ibid 202.
30 Ibid. 69. And see 43 Leg. Int. 281.
704 MABRIAGE.
A market, when established, may imply a license to any one to enter as a buyer, but
not necessarily as a seller.
There is no market overt in Pennsylvania, and the owner of goods, horses, &e.,
stolen from him or obtained by fraud, may recover in replevin, the value of the horse
or other chattel stolen, as it was at the time it came to the defendant’s possession.’
Marriage.
I, Acts of assembly. II, Judicial decisions on the subject of marriage and its effects.
III. A marriage ceremony.
From and after the first day of October Anno Domini, one thousand eight hundred
and ninety-five, no person within this commonwealth shall be joined in marriage untila
license shall have been obtained for that purpose from the clerk of the orphans’ court in
the county wherein either of the contracting parties resides, or in the county where the
marriage is performed: Provided, That one or both of the applicants shall be identi-
fied to the satisfaction of the clerk applied to for such license. A license so issued
shall authorize the marriage ceremony to be performed in any county of this common-
wealth: Provided, however, That a duplicate, as provided for in section one in the
marriage license act of June twenty-third, one thousand eight hundred and eighty- |
five, shall in all cases, by the person solemnizing said marriage, be returned duly signed
to the clerk of the orphans’ court of the county in which the marriage is solemnized,
and shall by him be recorded as provided in the fourth section of said act of June
twenty-third, one thousand eight hundred and eighty-five.
Which said license shall be in form as follows, to wit:
State of Pennsylvania, \ ea
County of —, .
To any minister of the gospel, justice of the peace, or other officers or persons authorized
by law to solemnize marriage: You are hereby authorized to join together, in the holy state
of matrimony, according to the rites and ceremonies of your church, society or religious
denomination, and the laws of the commonwealth of Pennsylvania, A. B.and C.D. Given
under my hand and the seal of the orphans’ court of said county of ——, at ——, this ——
day of ——, Anno Domini one thousand ——. —— —, Clerk.
For which said license, the said clerk shall receive the sum of fifty cents.
The said license shall have appended to it two certificates, numbered to correspond
with the said license (one marked original and one marked duplicate), which shall be
in form, as follows:
I, ——, hereby certify, that on the —— day of ——, one thousand ——, at ——, —~
and —— were, by me, united in marriage, in accordance with license issued by the clerk of
the orphans’ court of —— county, Pennsylvania, numbered ——.
(Signed) —
Minister of the Gospel [Justice of the Peace or Alderman].
And the certificate marked “ original’’ shall, by the person solemnizing the marriage,
be given to the persons married, and the certificate marked “duplicate’’ shall be
returned to the clerk of the orphans’ court of the proper county, as provided in section
four of this act: Provided, That in all cases in which the parties intend solemnizing
their marriage themselves, no such marriage shall take place, until the clerk of the
orphans’ court of the proper county shall certify their right so to do, in declaration in
the following form :
To A. B. and C. D.: Legal evidence having been furnished to me, in accordance with
the act of assembly, approved the twenty-third day of June, one thousand eight hundred
and eighty-five, this certifies, that I am satisfied that there is no legal impediment to you
joining yourselves together in marriage. A. B., Clerk.
11 Phila, 338. 21 Y. 478, 2 Ibid. 347. 5S. & R. 180. 8 Ibid.
501, 9 Ibid. 338. 6 Whart. 422,
MARRIAGE. 705
And in lieu of the certificate above given, there shall be appended to such declara-
tion, two certificates in the following form :
We hereby certify that on the -—— day of —, one thousand eight hundred ——, we
united ourselves in marriage, at ——, in the county of ——, having first obtained from the
clerk of the orphans’ court of said county, a declaration that he was satisfied that there was
no existing legal impediment to our so doing. A.B, C.D
We the undersigned, were present at the solemnization of the marriage of A. B. and
C. D., as set forth in the foregoing certificate. 1
,
The clerk of said court shall procure, at the cost of the proper county, and keep a
suitable book in his office and among his records, to be called the marriage-license
docket, in which he shall make a complete record of the issuing of said licenses, and
all the matters which he shall be required to ascertain, relative to the rights of said
parties to obtain said license, together with their ages and residences.”
The clerk of the court shall inquire of the parties applying, either separately or
together, for marriage license as aforesaid, on oath or affirmation, relative to the
legality of the contemplated marriage, and if there be no legal objection thereto, then
he shall grant such marriage license; or the parties intending marriage may, either
separately or together, appear before any magistrate, alderman or justice of the peace
of the township, ward or county wherein either of the contracting parties resides, and
in the county where the license is desired, who may and is hereby authorized to inquire
of them touching the legality of their contemplated marriage, and such inquiries and
the answers thereto, having been subscribed and sworn to by the parties before such
officer, may be fowarded to the clerk of the court, who, if satisfied after an examina-
tion thereof that the same is genuine, and that no legal objection to the contemplated
marriage exists, shall grant a license therefor.
If any of the persons intendiag to marry, by virtue of such license, shall be under
twenty-one years of age, the consent of their parents or guardians shall be personally
given before said clerk, or certified under the hand of such parent or guardian, attested
by two adult witnesses, and the signature of such parent or guardian shall be properly
acknowledged before a notary-public, or other officer competent under the law to
receive acknowledgments; which said certificate and oath shall be filed of record in
aaid office and entry of the same shall be made by the said clerk on the marriage-
license docket as a part of the records of the issuing of said license, and for which he
shall receive as his fees the sum of fifty cents, in addition to the marriage license fee ;
and the said magistrate, alderman or justice of the peace, for services rendered by
him under the provisions of this act, shall be entitled to the sum of fifty cents.
The clerk of the courts shall furnish magistrates, aldermen, or justices of the peace,
at the cost of the proper county, all necessary blanks for acknowledgments and affidavit
herein required.
If any clerk of any of said courts shall in any other manner issue or sign any mar-
Tiage license, or if any magistrate, alderman or justice of the peace shall wilfully make
any false return to the clerk of the court, he shall forfeit and pay any sum not exceed-
ing one thousand dollars, to and for the use of the party aggrieved.®
The certificate provided for, marked ‘‘ duplicate,” in section one of this act, shall,
by the person solemnizing said marriage, be returned, duly signed, to the clerk of the
orphans’ court, who issued the license, within thirty days after the solemnization of
said marriage, and the said clerk, upon the reception of any certificate as provided for
herein, shall immediately enter the same on the docket, where the marriage-license of
said person is recorded; or if the marriage be solemnized by the parties themselves,
the certificate of such marriage shall be signed by them, attested by two witnesses,
and filed with said clerk as aforesaid, and said certificate shall be filed among the
records of his office; and every minister, justice or other person, who shall neglect or
refuse to transmit said certificate to said clerk within the time prescribed by this act,
shall forfeit and pay the sum of fifty dollars; and the clerk who shall neglect or refuse
to make such record, without any additional fee, shall also forfeit and pay the sum of
fifty dollars. Said fines and forfeitures to be for the use of the county in which said
marriage license was granted.*
1 Act 23 June 1885 21, as amended by the 3 Act 23 June 1885 3 3, as amended by act 23
act 1 May 1893. Purd. 1295. May 1887.
2 Act 23 June 1885 3 2. “bid. 2 4.
4a
706 MARRIAGE.
If any minister, justice, or any other officer or person shall solemnize the marriage
ceremony, or shall be attesting witnesses to the same, within this commonwealth,
without said persons having first obtained the proper license as hereinbefore mentioned
and set forth, he or they, so officiating or attesting, shall forfeit and pay the sum of
one hundred dollars, to and for the use of the county in which said marriage was
solemnized.? .
A certified copy of the record of said marriage-license and certificate, under the
hand of said clerk and seal of said court, shall be received in all courts of this com-
monwealth as prima facie evidence of said marriage between the parties therein
named.”
Any fine or forfeiture arising to the county, or any party, person or persons, 1n con-
sequence of the violation of any of the preceding sections of this act, shall be recovered
by an action of debt, in the name of said party or persons, or county, as plaintiffs, in
the same manner as other debts are recoverable by law, with the usual costs, in any
court of record in any county of this commonwealth in which the defendant or
defendants shall be found.®
Any judge, justice or clergyman who shall perform the marriage ceremony between
parties, when either of said parties is intoxicated, shall be deemed guilty of a misde-
meanor, and upon a conviction thereof shall pay a fine of fifty dollars, and be im-
prisoned at,the discretion of the court not exceeding sixty days.*
Every person in whose care or possession may be found the record kept by any
minister of the gospel, judge, alderman or justice of the peace, of any marriage con-
tract solemnized by or in the presence of such minister of the gospel, judge, alderman
or justice of the peace, shall, on application made to him, and the payment or tender
of a fee of fifty cents, in every case, deliver to the person applying for the same, a full
transcript of the record or entry in such case, with a proper certificate of correctness
of said transcript; and any person having possession of such record as aforesaid,
neglecting or refusing to comply with the provisions of this section, shall be liable to
a penalty of fifty dollars, to be sued for and recovered with costs, before any justice of
the peace of the proper county, by any person aggrieved, one half to be paid to the
person suing for the same, and the other half to the county in which suit is brought.
In any and every case where the father and mother of an illegitimate child or chil-
dren shall enter into the bonds of lawful wedlock and cohabit, such child or children
shall thereby become legitimated, and enjoy all the rights and privileges as if they had
been born during the wedlock of their parents.®
The act, entitled ‘‘ An act to legitimate children born out of lawful wedlock,”’
passed the 14th day of May 1857, shall be taken to apply to all cases within the terms
of that act, prior to its date, as well as those subsequent thereto: Provided, That no
estate already vested, shall be divested by this act.’
All marriages heretofore contracted between parties within the degrees of affinity,
as prescribed in the 39th section of the act of 21st March 1860 of which issue is born,
are hereby legalized, and the child or children of such marriages shall have all the
rights and privileges of children born in lawful wedlock: Provided, That nothing in
pa act shall relate to marriages within the degrees of consanguinity as now prohibited
y law.
II. Though marriage is of Divine institution, and a sacred ordinance of the Chris-
tian religion, yet the law of the state regards it merely as a civil contract, by which
the parties enter into certain obligations toward each other, and the public. It may
be completed by any words in the present tense, without regard to form; neither is
the intervention of a clergyman or magistrate necessary to its validity? Its validity is
to be determined by the law of the place where it was celebrated; if valid there, it is
valid everywhere.° But this rule refers to the forms of entering into the marriage
contract; the essentials of the contract depend on the laws of the country in which
the parties are domiciled at the time of the marriage." The consent of the parties to
.
1 Act 23 June 1885 35. Purd. 1297. T Act 21 April 1858, Purd. 1297,
3 Ibid 6. 8 Act 6 April 1868, Ibid. 1298.
3 Ibid 2 7. 96 Binn. 405. 2W.9. 53 Penn. St.132, 2
4 Act 8 May 1854 $4. Purd. 1297. Brewst. 149,179. 13 W. N.C. 76,
5 Act 10 April 1849 2.2. Pamph, 649, 1010 W. 158. 2 Browst, 290.
6 Act 14 May 1857. Purd. 1297. 127, & H. Pr. 3 2322, and authorities cited.
MARRIAGE. 707
the alleged marriage is to be determined by what took place at the time of its celebra-
tion; it is not affected by a secret reservation of one of them.!
For civil purposes, cohabitation and reputation are sufficient evidence of a marriage ;?
and this rule has not been affected in any manner by the act of 1885. But to estab-
lish a marriage by cohabitation and reputation, the former must be marital in its
character, and the reputation must be general; the acts of the parties should be
inconsistent with any other inference than that of marriage to justify the repute of it,
and this repute should be credited by their relatives, neighbors and acquaintances.®
Cohabitation and reputation do not in themselves constitute a legal marriage ; they
are merely circumstantial evidence of a marriage in fact.t Where the relation is shown
to have had an illicit origin, it is presumed to continue so, until proof of a change.®
It is a well-settled principle, that the husband is noé bound by the contracts of his
wife, unless by some act or declaration, prior or subsequent to the contract, his con-
sent may be fairly inferred. The husband is not liable on a negotiable note given by
his wife, even in a suit by a bond fide indorsee, unless it were given with his authority
or approbation, and that must be shown, before such note is admissible in evidence
against the husband.”
The husband is liable for necessaries furnished his wife during her separation from
him, though it was by her agreement, if she offer to return and he refuse to receive
her, and have furnished no means for her subsistence.? If a man cohabit with a
woman, to whom he is not married, and permit her to assume his name, and appear
to the world as his wife, and in that character to contract debts for necessaries, he will
become liable, although the creditor be acquainted with her real situation: for here a
like assent will be implied, as in the case of husband and wife.®
By the common law, a man who married a woman with children by a former hus-
band, took upon himself, during coverture, all the obligations that lay on the wife. If
she was able to maintain her children, when he married her, he became bound to
maintain them afterward; if she was not able, he was not bound, for it was not a
natural duty that one man should support another man’s offspring. This principle of
the common law has been changed by the act of 1848, which withdrew from the hus-
band the control and ownership of the property of the wife, and exempted him ex-
pressly from liability for her debts. Whatever may have been the former rule, it is
manifest, under that act, that obligations must cease to exist, when the benefits which
formed their equivalent and compensation are withdrawn.”
When is a wife excused for criminal misconduct? In some cases, the command or
authority of the husband, either expressed or implied, will privilege the wife from
punishment; and therefore, if a woman commit theft, burglary or other criminal
offence against the laws of society, by the coercion of her husband, or even in his
company, which the law construes a coercion, she is not guilty of any crime; being
considered as acting by compulsion and not of her own will." The husband, however,
must be present when the offence is committed, or the presumption of coercion by
him does not arise.”
The wife is not treated as an accessory to a felony, for receiving her husband who
has been guilty of it: though, on the contrary, it appears, the husband would be for
receiving his wife.
The law seems to protect the wife in all felonies committed by her in company with
her husband, except murder and manslaughter. In treason, also, no plea of coverture
shall excuse the wife ; no presumption of the husband’s coercion shall extenuate her
guilt.
In all misdemeanors, it appears, that the wife may be found guilty with the hus-
band, and in all cases where the wife offends alone, without the company or coercion
of her husband, she is responsible for her offence, as much as any feme sole.
135 Penn. St. 13.
21P.& W. 450. 25 Penn. St. 326.
N.C. 112,
3 34 Leg, Int. 428,
493 Penn. St. 38. And see 85 Ibid, 352.
5 86 Ibid. 294.
6 5 Binn, 236.
“T5.W. 4&8. 164. 15 Penn. St. 185.
61 Ibid.
361. 1 Gr. 253. 2 Brewst. 149,179,202, 2 W.
878. & R. 347.
9 Selw. N. P. 296.
10 2 Wood. 181.
111 Hawk. P. C. 3. Whart. Cr. L.3 71. 1
Den. OC. C. 549.
12 Russ. & Ry. 270. See 28 Leg. Int. 310.
13 Hale H. P.C. 44. Whart. Cr. L. 2 80.
14 Hale H. P. C. 47. Add. Ch. 66.
15 4 Bl. Com. 29-30. ;
708 MARRIED WOMEN.
III. MarRgiaGE CEREMONY.
The Magistrate, addressing the persons assembled, shall say :—
WE are gathered together here, in the sight of God and in the face of this company, to
join together this man and this woman in holy matrimony, which is honorable among all
men, and, therefore, is not by any to be entered into unadvisedly or lightly, but reverently,
discreetly, advisedly, soberly and in the fear of God. Into this holy estate these two per-
sons present come now to be joined; if any one can show just cause why they may not be
lawfully joined together, let him now speak, or else hereafter for ever hold his peace.
The magistrate shall then address himself to the man, and say:
A. B., wilt thou have this woman to be thy wedded wife, to live together after God’s
ordinance, in the holy estate of matrimony? wilt thou love her, comfort her, and keep her
in sickness and in health, and forsaking all others, keep thee only unto her so long as ye
both shall live?
The man shall answer, “I will.”’
Then shall the magistrate say unto the woman :
C. D., wilt thou have this man to be thy wedded husband, to live together after God’s
ordinance, in the holy estate of matrimony? wilt thou obey him, and love him, and keep
him in sickness and in health, and forsaking all others, keep thee only unto him so long as
ye both shall live?
The woman shall answer, ‘‘I will.’
The magistrate, then joining their right hands together, shall say :
Forasmuch as A. B. and C. D. have consented together in holy wedlock, and have wit-
nessed the same before God and this company, and thereto have given and pledged their
faith each to the other, and have declared the same by joining of hands, I do, by virtue of
the authority vested in me by the laws of the state of Pennsylvania, pronounce that they
are man and wife; and let no one put asunder those who have thus been joined together in
the presence of God and before this company.
The act of 1885 (supra) prescribes a form of marriage certificate.
Married Come.
I. Rights and powers of married women. V. Rights and liabilities of husband.
II. Parental rights of wife. VI. Suits by and against husband and wife.
III. Separate earnings and services. VII. Contracts between husband and wife.
IV. Necessaries. VIII. Insanity of husband or wife.
I. RIGHTS AND POWERS OF MARRIED WOMEN.
Act 11 Apri 1848. Purd. 1298.
Szcr. 6. Every species and description of property, whether consisung of real, per-
sonal or mixed, which may be owned by or belong to any single woman, shall continue
to be the property of such woman, as fully after her marriage as before, and all such
property, of whatever name or kind, which shall accrue to any married woman during
coverture, by will, descent, deed of conveyance or otherwise, shall be owned, used and
enjoyed by such married woman as her own separate property ; and the said property,
whether owned by her before marriage, or which shall accrue to her afterwards, shall
not be subject to levy and execution for the debts or liabilities of her husband; nor
shall such property be sold, conveyed, mortgaged, transferred, or in any manner in-
cumbered by her husband, without her written consent first had and obtained, and
duly acknowledged before one of the judges of the courts of common pleas of this
commonwealth, that such consent was not the result of coercion on the part of her
MARRIED WOMEN. 709
said husband, but that the same was voluntarily given and of her own free will:
Provided, That her said husband shall not be liable for the debts of the wife con-
tracted before marriage: Provided, That nothing in this act shall be construed to
protect the property of any such married woman from liability for debts contracted
by herself, or in her name, by any person authorized to do so, or from levy and exe-
cution on any judgment that may be recovered against a husband for the torts of the
wife; and in such cases, execution shall be first had against the property of the wife.
Act 8 JUNE 1893. Purd. 1299.
Sect. 1. Hereafter a married woman shall have the same right and power as an
unmarried person to acquire, own, possess, control, use, lease, sell or otherwise dispose
of any property of any kind, real, personal or mixed, and either in possession or ex-
pectancy, and may exercise the said right and power in the same manner and to the
game extent as an unmarried person, but she may not mortgage or convey her real
property, unless her husband join in such mortgage or conveyanee.
Sect. 2. Hereafter a married woman may, in the same manner and to the same extent
as an unmarried person, make any contract in writing or otherwise, which is necessary,
appropriate, convenient or advantageous to the exercise or enjoyment of the rights
and powers granted by the foregoing section, but she may not become accommodation
indorser, maker, guarantor or surety for another, and she may not execute or acknowl-
edge a deed or written instrument, conveying or mortgaging her real property, unless
her husband join in such mortgage or conveyance.
Sect. 5. Hereafter a married woman may dispose of her property, real and per-
sonal, by last will and testament, in writing signed by her or by her direction, or
attested by her mark made by her or by her direction, at the end thereof in the same
manner as if she were unmarried: Provided, That nothing in this act shall affect her
husband’s right as tenant by courtesy, nor his right to take against her will, as pro-
vided by existing laws.
Secr. 6. The married persons’ property act, approved June three, one thousand
eight hundred and eighty seven, and all other acts inconsistent herewith are hereby
repealed.
Act 25 Apri 1850. Purd. 1300.
Scr. 11, Whenever by the provisions of the act of assembly of this commonwealth,
entitled ‘‘ A supplement to an act entitled ‘An act relative to the Le Raysville Pha-
lanx,’ passed March, Anno Domini 1847, and relative to obligors and obligees ; to se-
cure the rights of married women; in relation to defalcation; and to extend the
boundaries of the borough of Ligonier,’’ et cetera, passed the 11th day of April, a. D.
1848, the property of a married woman is secured to her, and she shall have no trustee
of the same, it shall be lawful for any such married woman to apply to the court of,
common pleas of the county where she was domiciled at the time of her marriage, for
the appointment of a trustee of the same, and such court shall appoint a trustee of
the same, not being the husband of the said petitioner ; and it shall further be lawful
for any such married woman to declare a trust in regard to such property or any part
thereof, in favor of any of her children.
Act 22 AprIL 1863. Purd. 1300.
Sxct. 1. Where any estate in lands, tenements, hereditaments or any property,
real or personal, has been heretofore, by any will or other instrument, taking effect
subsequent to the 11th day of April 1848, devised, conveyed, given to or in any way
acquired by any married woman, to and for the separate use, or as her separate estate,
without the intervention of a trustee, and the same shall heretofore have been con-
veyed or mortgaged by her, by any deed or instrument duly acknowledged by her,
before any officer having authority to take acknowledgments of deeds and mortgages,
and in which her husband has joined as a party, the said conveyance or mortgage, and
the estates and interests thereby created, shall be and be taken to be of like force and
effect, in all respects, as if the same had been given and executed under and in the
due exercise of a power authorizing such conveyance or mortgage, contained in the
710 MARRIED WOMEN.
instrument by which the said separate estate of the said married woman Was created :
Provided, That this act shall not affect any case heretofore finally adjudicated by the
supreme court.
Act 10 Aprin 1867. Purd. 1300.
Sor. 1. Nothing contained in the first section of the act to which this is a supple-
ment, shall be taken to affect or apply to the separate estate of a married woman,
where the right to convey or incumber the same has been wichheld in the will, deed
or other instrument by which the said separate estate of the said married woman was
created.
Act 14 May 1874. Purd. 1300.
Sect. 1. That so much of the act approved April 11th, Anno Domini 1848, as re-
quires the acknowledgment of any instrument in writing, intended to assign and
transfer the interest of any married woman in her personal property, to be acknowl-
edged before one of the judges of the courts of common pleas of this commonwealth,
be and the same is hereby repealed; and any acknowledgment in such form as re-
quired by law, which may hereafter be made in such cases, before any alderman,
justice of the peace, notary-public or other officer authorized to take acknowledgments
in this commonwealth, shall be as valid and effectual, for all purposes whatsoever, as
if made before said judge of the court of common pleas.
Act 11 Apri 1856. Purd. 1301.
Suct. 4. Whenever any married woman of lawful age shall be entitled to a legacy,
or to a distributive share of the personal estate, or of the proceeds of the real estate of
a deceased person, it shall be competent for her, either in person or by attorney, to
sign, seal and deliver a refunding bond, in pursuance of the act of assembly in such
case made and provided; and also to execute all such other instruments, and to per-
form all such other acts as may by law be necessary to be done, or may be lawfully
required by the executor or administrator, upon the payment to her of the moneys to
be distributed as aforesaid, with the same effect, for the intent and purpose of binding
her separate estate, as if she were sole and unmarried.
Act 2 Jung 1871. Purd. 1301.
Szcr. 1. It shall and may be lawful for any married woman, owning any share or
shares of the capital stock of any railroad company, to sell and transfer the same,
with like effect as if she were unmarried.
Aot 29 Frspruary 1872. Purd. 1301.
Scr. 1. All contracts made by married women, in the purchase of sewing-machines
for their own use, shall be valid and binding, without the necessity of the husband
joining in the same.
Act 18 Marcu 1875. Purd. 1301.
Sxcr. 1. It shall and may be lawful for any married woman owning any of the loans
of this commonwealth, or of the city of Philadelphia, or any of the loans, or share or
shares, of the capital stock of any corporation, created by or under the laws of this
eee iaaciaa to sell and transfer the same with the like effect as if she were un-
married.
Act 25 May 1878. Purd. 1301.
Scr. 1. It shall and may be lawful for any married woman, owning any mortgage
or mortgages, judgment or judgments, to sell, assign and transfer, or satisfy the same
of record, with like effect as if she were unmarried.
Srcr. 2. Whenever, heretofore, any mortgage or mortgages, judgment or judg-
ments, owned by any married woman, has or have been paid to her, and satisfaction
MARRIED WOMEN. 711
of record has been entered thereon in the office of the prothonotary, or of the recorder
of deeds of the proper county, by any married woman, such payment and satisfac-
tion of record shall be a good and valid discharge of the lien of such mortgage or
judgment.
Act 24 Frpruary 1859. Purd. 408.
Tt shall be lawful for the courts to permit married women to be incorporated with
others, in any institution composed of women, or to be under their management, for
the care and education of children, or for the support of sick or indigent women.
Act 9 ApriL 1879. Purd. 1301.
In all cases, married women shall be deemed and held qualified, or free from any
disability on account of coverture, for appointment and acting as corporators or officers
of all associations incorporated heretofore, or that may be hereafter incorporated, for
purposes of learning, benevolence, charity or religion.
II. PARENTAL RIGHTS OF WIFE.
Act 4 May 1855. Purd. 1301.
Scr. 3. Whensoever any husband or father, from drunkenness, profligacy or other
cause, shall neglect or refuse to provide for his child or children, the mother of such
children shall have all the rights and be entitled to claim, and be subject to all the
duties reciprocally due between a father and his children, and she may place them at
employment and receive their earnings, or bind them to apprenticeship, without the
interference of such husband, the same as the father can now do by law: Provided
always, That she shall afford to them a good example, and properly educate and main-
tain them according to her ability: And provided, That ifthe mother be of unsuitable
character to be entrusted as aforesaid, or dead, the proper court may appoint a guardian
of such children, who shall perform the duties aforesaid, and apply the earnings of
such children for their maintenance and education.
III. SEPARATE EARNINGS AND SERVICES.
Act 3 Aprit 1872. Purd. 1301.
Sect. 1. The separate earnings of any married woman of the state of Pennsy:vania,
whether said earnings shall be as wages for labor, salary, property, business or other-
wise, shall accrue to and inure to the separate benefit and use of said married woman,
and be under the control of such married woman, independently of her husband, and
s0 as not to be subject to any legal claim of such husband, or to the claims of any
creditor or creditors of such husband, the same as if such married woman were a feme
sole: Provided, That in any suit at law or in equity, in which the ownership of such
property shall be in dispute, the person claiming such property, under this act, shall
be compelled, in the first instance, to show title and ownership in the same.
Srcr. 2. To prevent any fraudulent practices under this act, before any married
woman shall be entitled to its benefits, she shall first present her petition, under oath or
affirmation, to the court of common pleas of the city or county where she resides,
stating her intention of thereafter claiming the benefits of this act; whereupon the
said court shail direct her petition aforesaid to be marked filed, and to be recorded in
the office for recording deeds for such city or county; and such record shall be conclu-
sive evidence of the right of such married woman to the benefit of the first section of
this act.
Act 11 June 1879. Purd. 1302.
Szct. 1. In all actions hereafter to be brought in any of the courts of this common-
wealth, in the name of the husband and wife, for the use of the wife, to recover
damages for injuries done to the wife, evidence may be given to show the value of the
wife's services, and the expense arising in consequence of such injuries, and recovery
712 MARRIED WOMEN.
may be had therefor: Provided, however, That at the time of bringing any such
actions, the husband shall file a stipulation in writing, disclaiming all right on his part
to recover damages for such injuries by an action in his own name: And provided
further, That any damages so recovered shall be for the use of the wife.
IV. N&cEssARIES.
Act 11 Aprit 1848. Purd. 1302.
Sxcr. 8. In all cases where debts may be contracted for necessaries, for the support
and maintenance of the family of any married woman, it shall be lawful for the
creditor, in such case, to institute suit against the husband and wife for the price of
such necessaries, after obtaining a judgment, have an execution against the husband
alone; and if no property of the said husband be found, the officer executing the said
writ shall so return, and thereupon an alias execution may be issued, which may be
levied upon and satisfied out of the separate property of the wife, secured to her
under the provisions of the first section of this act: Provided, That judgment shall
not be rendered against the wife, in such joint action, unless it shall have been proved
that the debt sued for in such action was contracted by the wife, or incurred for articles
necessary for the support of the family of the said husband and wife.
V. RIGHTS AND LIABILITIES OF THE HUSBAND.
Act 11 Aprin 1848. Purd. 1302.
Sect. 9. When any married woman, possessed of separate persona: property as
aforesaid, shall die intestate, her husband shall be first entitled to letters of adminis-
tration on her estate, which said estate shall be distributed as follows: if such married
woman shall leave no children nor the descendants of such living, the husband shall
be entitled to such personal estate absolutely ; if such married woman shall leave a
child or children living, her personal estate shall be divided amongst the husband and
such child or children, share and share alike; if any such child or children, being dead,
shall have left issue, such issue shall be entitled to the share of the parent.
Srcr. 10. The real estate of such married woman upon her decease, shall be dis-
tributed as provided for by the intestate laws of this commonwealth, now in force:
Provided, That nothing contained in this act shall be deemed or taken to deprive the
husband of his right as tenant by curtesy.
Act 22 Aprin 1850. Purd. 1303.
Sxcr. 20. The true intent and meaning of the act of assembly to secure the rights
of married women, passed the 11th day of April, A.D. 1848, is and hereafter shall be,
that the real estate of any married woman in this commonwealth shall not be subject
to execution for any debt against her husband, on account of any interest he may have
or may have had therein, as tenant by the curtesy; but the same shall be exempt
from levy and sale for such debt, during the life of said wife.
Act 1 APRIL 1863. Purd. 1303.
Srcr. 1. The true intent and meaning of the act of assembly to secure the rights of
married women, passed the 11th day of April, a.p. 1848, and the supplements
thereto, are hereby declared to be that no judgment obtained against the husband of
any married woman, before or during marriage, shall bind or be a lien upon her real
— or upon any interest the husband may be entitled to therein as tenant by the
curtesy.
Act 4 May 1855. Purd. 1303.
Sxor. 1. The power of any married woman to bequeath or devise her property by
will, shall be restricted, as regards the husband, to the same extent as the husband’s
power so to dispose of his property is restricted, as regards the wife, namely: go that
MARRIED WOMEN. 713
any surviving husband may, against her will, elect to take such share and interest in
her real and personal estate as she can, when surviving, elect to take against his will in
his estates, or otherwise to take only her real estate as tenant by the curtesy: Pro-
vided, That nothing herein contained shall affect the right or power of the wife, by
virtue of any authority or appointment contained in any deed or will, to grant, be-
queath, devise (or), as heretofore, any property held in trust for her sole and separate
use.
Sect. 5. No husband who shall have, as aforesaid, for one year or upwards previous
to the death of his wife, wilfully neglected or refused to provide for his wife, or shall
have, for that period or upwards, wilfully and maliciously deserted her, shall have the
right to claim any right or title in her real or personal estate, after her decease, as
tenant by the curtesy, or under the intestate laws of this commonwealth.
Secr. 6. No father who shall have as aforesaid, for one year or upwards previous to
his death, wilfully neglected or refused to provide for his child or children, shall have
right to appoint any testamentary guardian of him, her or them, during minority.
Act 11 Aprin 1856. Purd. 1303.
Sect. 2. Nothing in said act contained shall be construed to authorize any married
woman to contract any debt or liability, so as to make liable her husband or his estate,
further than she might have done before the passage of said act.
VI. Surrs BY AND AGAINST HUSBAND AND WIFE.
Act 11 June 1879. Purd. 1303.
Szcr. 2. In all cases where a wife has been deserted, abandoned or driven from her
home by her husband, it shall be lawful for her to bring suit in any of the courts of
this commonwealth, against her husband, or any other person or persons, without the
assistance or intervention of a trustee or next friend, or may assign, transfer or indorse
over to any person or persons, any mortgage, bond, judgment, promissory note or
other evidence of indebtedness, against her husband or any other person, in same
manner and with like effect as if she were sole and unmarried, shall also be entitled to
the privileges, and be liable for costs as other plaintiffs.
Act 8 JUNE 1893. Purd. 1303.
Szcr. 3. Hereafter a married woman may sue and be sued civilly in all respects and
in any form of action and with the same effect and results and consequences as an un-
married person, but she may not sue her husband, except in a proceeding for divorce,
or in a proceeding to protect or recover her separate property whensoever he may
have deserted or separated himself from her without sufficient cause, or may have
neglected or refused to support her, nor may he sue her, except in a proceeding for
divorce, or in a proceeding to protect or recover his separate property whensoever she
may have deserted him, or separated herself from him without sufficient cause, nor
may she be arrested or imprisoned for her torts.
Sect. 4. In any proceeding brought by either under the provisions of section three
to protect or recover the separate property of either, both shall be fully competent
witnesses, except that neither may testify to confidential communications made by one
or the other, unless this privilege be waived upon the trial. :
$
VII. ConTRACTS BETWEEN HUSBAND AND WIFE.
Act 15 Aprin 1851. Purd. 1304.
Sucr. 22, It shall and may be lawful for married women to loan to their husbands
moneys, being of the separate estate of the wife, and to take in security therefor a
judgment or mortgage against the estate of the husband, in the name of a third person,
who shall act as trustee for such married woman; and any such security heretofore or
hereafter taken bond fide to secure such loan or moneys received by the husband from
a
714 MARRIED WOMEN.
the proceeds of the real or personal estate of the wife, shall be as good and valid in
law against the estate of the husband, as though the same had been invested by a
trustee appointed by the court.
VIII. Insanity oF HUSBAND OR WIFE.
Act 28 OcroBEerR 1851. Purd. 1304.
Szcr. 7. When any married woman in this commonwealth hath become insane, it
shall be lawful for her husband, upon application to the court of common pleas of the
proper county, to select and appoint three discreet and intelligent persons, one of
whom shall be a practising physician, who shall make an examination, personal or
otherwise, of such alleged insanity, and report the facts to the court, and if the said
court be fully satisfied that the said married woman is insane, and approve the said
report, the same shall be filed of record in said court; and the husband shall thence-
forth, upon giving good and sufficient security to the commonwealth for the faithful
performance of his trust, have full power to transact all business relating to the man-
agement or disposition of his or her real and personal estate, in as full and ample a
manner as he might or could do, if his said wife was sane, and gave her full consent
thereto.
Act 25 May 1878. Purd. 1304.
Sect. 1. Any married woman whose husband has been duly found to be a lunatic,
by a court of competent jurisdiction within this commonwealth, and who owns lands
as her separate estate in this commonwealth, in fee simple or otherwise, may dispose
of the same, by deed or otherwise, or bind the same by mortgage, as fully and com-
pletely as she could, if she were a,feme sole, without her husband joining in or consent-
ing to said deed or mortgage, subject nevertheless to the rights of the husband under
the intestate laws of this commonwealth: Provided, That the court of common pleas
of the proper county may, upon the petition of the committee of the husband, author-
ize the sale of his rights to, or interest in, such real estate.
Act 28 Marcu 1879. Purd. 1304.
Sect. 1. In all cases where deeds conveying titles to real estate, situated within this
commonwealth, have been or shall hereafter be executed by a committee in lunacy,
under an order of any court having jurisdiction of the same, it shall be competent for
the wife of such lunatic to release or divest her dower right or claim in nature thereof
in such real estate, in the same manner as if she were a widow and not under cover-
ture: Provided, That such release shall have been executed prior to a decree de-
claring that such lunatic has been restored to his reason or sanity.
{ 715 J
Master and Serbant.
Of the relation of master and servant.
THERE are many important legal consequences which flow from the relation of
master and servant. A master may bring an action against any man for beating or
maiming his servant, but in such case he must assign, asa special reason for so
doing, his own damage by the loss of his services; and this loss must be proved
upon the trial." The master is answerable for the act of his servant, if done by
his command, either expressly given or implied. Therefore, if the servant commit
a trespass, by the command or encouragement of his master, the master shall be
guilty of it, though the servant is not thereby excused, for he is only to obey his
master in matters that are honest and lawful. In the same manner, whatever a
servant is permitted to do in the usual course of his business, is equivalent to a gen
eral command. IfI pay money to a banker’s servant, the banker is answerable for
it; if I pay it to a clergyman’s or a physician’s servant, whose business is not to
receive money for his master, and he embezzles it, I must pay it over again. If a
steward lets a lease of a farm, without the owner’s knowledge, the owner must
stand to the bargain, for this is a steward’s business. If I usually deal with a
tradesman by myself, or constantly pay him ready money, I am not answerable for
what my servant takes up upon trust, for here is no implied order to the tradesman
to trust my servant; but if I usually send him upon trust, or sometimes on trust
and sometimes with ready money, 1 am answerable for all he takes up, for the
tradesman cannot possibly distinguish when he comes by my order, and when upon
his own authority.
When a man gives his servant money to pay for commodities as he buys them,
if the servant pockets that money, the master will not be liable to pay it over again ;
but if the master employs his servant to buy things on credit, he will be liable to
whatever extent the servant shall pledge his credit?
The acts of a servant bind his master only when done in the course of the busi-
ness committed to him, or within the scope of an authority specially delegated.4
And, therefore, a master is not responsible for the wrongful conversion of his ser-
vant, not committed in the regular course of his employment, nor commanded by
the master, and the benefit of which did not inure to the master.®
A master is chargeable if any of his family layeth or casteth anything out of his
house into the street or common highway, to the damage of any individual, or is a
common nuisance, for the master has the superintendence and charge of all his
household. If a servant, by his negligence, does any damage to a stranger, the
master shall answer for his neglect; if a smith’s servant lames a horse while he is
shoeing him, an action lies against the master, and not against the servant. But in
these cases, the damage must be done while he is actually employed in the master’s
service, otherwise the servant shall answer for his own misbehavior.®
A master is not liable in trespass for the acts of his servant, unless the particular
wrongful act of the servant was done by his order ;’ nor is he liable for his ser-
vant’s deceit. A master is not liable for injuries designedly or intentionally inflicted
by his servant.
Where a person employed by one as his servant is using the team of his master
for his own purposes and benefit, and in the absence of, and without any directions
from, the master, uses the team so negligently as to occasion injury to a third party,
the master is not liable for such injury, although he assented to the servant using the
team for his own benefit.’
Faithful service is a condition precedent to the right of a servant to his wages ;
and if, during the term for which he has agreed to serve, he commit a criminal
Bl. Com. 431. 77 Penn. St, 238,
1 Penn. St. 319,
118i. Com. 429. 1
3
47 Ibid. 480.
2
2
6
2 Thid, 430. :
8 Peake’s Cas. 47. £
44 W. 222. 21 Penn. St. 507. 2
' 67 Phila. 153. »
Gr. 43.
6 Penn. St. 482.
716 MASTER AND SERVANT.
offence, although not immediately injurious to the person or property of his master,
he will not be entitled to recover any part of his wages.’ Pie
In the case of a hiring by the year, at a specified sum per month, it is not com-
petent for the employer, within the period contracted for, to reduce the amount of
monthly pay, without the consent of the other party.’ If one hired at an agreed
price, for a certain time, continue in the same service after the expiration of the
term, without any new agreement, the presumption of law is, that the parties
understood that the original rate of compensation was to be continued; such is
the contract which the law implies, and there can be no recovery upon a quantum
meruit, for any increased rate of compensation.® Where a person is employed for
a determinate period, and is improperly dismissed before the expiration of the
term, he can recover wages for the whole term, unless it can be shown that he was
engaged and rejected profitable service ;* but where the duration of service is not
defined, it is at will
In Pennsylvania, a master has no right to inflict corporal punishment on his
hired servant.
An action is maintainable at common law for enticing away the servant of another.’
Whoever, wrongfully and maliciously, or with notice, interrupts the relation sub-
sisting between master and servant, by procuring the servant to depart from the
master’s service, or by harboring and keeping him as a servant, after he has quitted
it, and during the time stipulated for as the period of service, whereby the master
is injured, cominits a wrongful act, for which he is responsible at law. And this
rule is not confined to menial servants, or laborers, but extends to all cases where
there is an unlawful or malicious enticing away of a person employed to give his
exclusive personal service for a given time, under the direction of an employer, who
is injured by the wrongful act.®
A servant cannot maintain an action against his master for not giving him a
character.” Ifthe master give a character which is false and slanderous, the ser-
vant may sue the master for it; but a master who honestly and fairly gives the
real and true character of a servant to one who asks his character, under pretence
of hiring him, is not liable to an action for so doing.¥
An employer has discharged his duty to a servant, when he furnishes him with
the tools and appliances which, though not the best possible to be obtained, may,
by ordinary care, be used without danger; when he has done so, he is not respon-
sible for accidents.? And where several persons are engaged in a common employ-
ment, and one of them is injured through the carelessness of another, the employer
is not responsible ;° and to bring a case within the rule, it is not necessary that
the two should be engaged in the same particular work; it is sufficient that the
general scope of their employment should be the same. A master, however, is liable
for an injury resulting from the act of a fellow-servant, if he himself were guilty of
negligence.®
1 W. & 8. 267. 91E. & BI. 216.
2 16 Penn. St. 196. 10 3 Esp. 201.
3 29 Ibid. 184. 36 Ibid. 367. U Bull. N. P. 8. 17. R.110,
4 44 Ibid. 99. 12 92 Penn. St. 276. 100 Ibid, 306.
> 46 Ibid. 434, 13 23 Penn. St. 384.
§ 1 Ash. 267. 1¢ 86 Ibid. 432. 96 Ibid. 176.
71 BL Com. 420, 1 61 Thid. 58,
*1E. & Bl. 216.
L vit]
sHlayhem.
I. Provisions of the Penal Code. II. Judicial decisions.
I. Act 31 Marca 1860. Purd. 523.
Secor. 80. If any person, on purpose, and of malice aforethought, by lying in
wait, shall unlawfully cut out or disable the tongue, put out an eye, slit the nose, cut
.off the nose, ear or lip, or cut off or disable any limb or member of another, or brand
another, with intention in sodoing to maim or disfigure such person ; or shall volun-
tarily, maliciously and of purpose, pull or put out an eye, or bite off the nose, ear,
lip, limb or member, or any part of the nose, ear, lip, limb or member of his oppo-
nent, while fighting, or otherwise ; every such offender shall be guilty of a misde-
meanor, and, on conviction, be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding one thousand
dollars, three-fourths parts whereof shall be for the use of the party grieved, and
undergo an imprisonment, by separate or solitary confinement, at labor, not exceeding
five years: Provided also, That the party grieved shall, in such prosecution, be
received as a competent witness, his credibility to be judged of by the jury, as in
other cases,
Sgor. 83. If any person, unlawfully ar'd maliciously, shall shoot at any person,
or shall, by drawing a trigger, or by any other manner, attempt to discharge any _
kind of loaded arms at any person, or shall stab, cut or wound any person, with
intent, in any of the cases aforesaid, to maim, disfigure or disable such person, the
person so offending shall be guilty of felony, and, on conviction, be sentenced to
pay a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars, and undergo an imprisonment, by
separate or solitary confinement, at labor, not exceeding three years. 1
Sect. 84. If any person shall, unlawfully, wilfully and maliciously, by the
explosion of gunpowder, or other explosive substance, burn, maim, disfigure, dis-
able or do grievous bodily harm to any person, he shall be guilty of felony, and, on
conviction, be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars, and to
undergo an imprisonment, by separate or solitary confinement, not exceeding three
years. 1
Sgor. 85. If any person shall unlawfully and maliciously cause any gunpowder,
or other explosive substance, to explode, or send or deliver to, or cause to be taken
and received by any person, any explosive substance, or any other dangerous or
noxious thing, or cast or throw at or upon, or otherwise apply to any person, any
corrosive fluid, or other destructive or explosive substance, with intent, in any of
the cases aforesaid, to burn, maim, disfigure or disable any person, or to do some
grievous bodily harm to such person, he shall be guilty of felony, and, on convic-
tion, be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars, and undergo
an imprisonment, by separate or solitary confinement, at labor, not exceeding three
ears. ?
- Szor. 90. If upon the trial of any indictment for felony, except murder or man-
slaughter, the indictment shall allege that the defendant did cut, stab or wound any
person, and the jury shall be satisfied that the defendant is guilty of the cutting,
stabbing or wounding charged in such indictment, but are not satisfied of his guilt
of the felony charged in such indictment, then, and in every such case, the jury
may acquit the defendant of such felony, and find him guilty of a misdemeanor, in
unlawfully cutting, stabbing and wounding ; and thereupon such defendant shall
be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars, and to undergo
an imprisonment, either at labor by separate or solitary confinement, or to simple
imprisonment, not exceeding three years.’
Act 8 May 1876. Purd. 477.
Swor. 1. Any person within this commonwealth who shall playfully or wantonly
point or discharge a gun, pistol or other fire-arm at any other person, shall be guilty
of a misdemeanor ; and upon conviction thereof, shall be sentenced to pay a fine
*
1 Purd. 477. 2 Thid. 478.
718 MECHANICS’ LIEN.
not exceeding one thousand dollars, and undergo an imprisonment not exceeding one
year, or either or both, at the discretion of the court.
II. Cutting or biting off the ear was not mayhem, at common law, but has been
made so by statute.? oe .
On the trial of an indictment for mayhem, the malice and lying in wait, need not
be expressly proved, but may be collected from all the circumstances of the case.?
An indictment, however, which leaves out the words “‘ lying in wait” is defective.
To convict under the first clause of the 80th section, there need be only a
general intent to maim and disfigure; but under the second clause, a particular
intent to put out the eye must be shown.* An indictment, under the latter clause,
which leaves out the word “voluntarily” is bad.
Mechanics’ Lien.
I. Lien of mechanics and material-men. V. Proceedings on the claim.
II. Lien for alterations and repairs. VI. Claims for extra compensation.-
III. Lien on leaseholds and fixtures. VII. Forms of claims of various sorts, as well
IV. Of the claim. well for material-men as mechanics.
I. LIEN OF MECHANICS AND MATERIAL-MEN.
Tue act of 16th June 1836, which by subsequent legislation, has been extended
throughout the commonwealth,® provides that every building erected shall be sub-
ject to a lien for the payment of all debts contracted for work done or materiais
furnished for or about the erection or construction of the same. That the lien of
such debt shall extend to the ground covered by such building, and to so much
other ground immediately adjacent thereto, and belonging to the same owner, as
may be necessary for the ordinary and useful purposes of such building.* And
that such lien shall be preferred to every other lien or incumbrance which attached
upon such building and ground, or either of them, subsequently to the commence-
ment of such building? The act of 28th April 1840, however, provides, that the
lien shall not extend to any other or greater estate on the ground on which any
building may be erected, than that of the person or persons in possession, at the
time of commencing the building, and at whose instance the same is erected, nor
shall any other or greater estate be sold by virtue of any execution authorized
by the statute.’ The act of 16th April 1845 extends the provisions of the mechanics’
lien law to the contractors for the erection of the building.’
As amechanic’s lien exists only by statute, the right to maintain it must, of
course, be found in the words of the act." And although the words of the statute,
prima, facie, embrace every building erected within the commonwealth, yet there
are certain well understood exceptions to the generality of its provisions. Thus, the
public buildings belonging to a county are not within the act; nor is a public
school-house ;* nor a railroad company’s depot ;“ nor any property of a public corpo-
ration, that is essential to its active operations.* But a church is such a building.”
Where the facts are undisputed, the question whether a building is within the
act, is necessarily one of law for the court.” Where, however, it is difficult to
decide, upon the whole of the evidence, whether the building be a new structure,
or only the alteration of an old one, it must be left to the jury as a question of fact.8
168. & R. 226. 11 33 Pitts. L. J. 209,
21Y. 415. 1237 W. & S. 197.
3 3 Ibid. 282. 18 18 Penn. St. 275, 92 Ibid. 229.
41 Ibid. 415, 14 5 Leg. & Ins. R. 107.
5 3 Ibid. 282. 15 60 Penn. St. 27. A grain elevator and stor-
6 Purd. 1306. age company is not such public corporation. 105
7 For the proceedings to determine the neces- Ibid. 248. And see 5 Phila. 13.
sary curtilage, see Purd. 1307, 16 10 Penn. St. 413.
8 Ibid. 1308. 11 Phila. 213, 2 Ibid. 113.
9 Ibid. 1309. 18 20 Penn. St. 520. 1 Pears. 282. 6 Luz. L.
10 Ibid. Reg. 203.
MECHANICS’ LIEN. 719
So, where the question whether a structure is one or two buildings, depends upon
disputed facts, it is for the jury." ;
It was formerly held, that an alteration of, or addition to, a house, was not the
subject of a lien; but this has now been altered by various special acts which have
been extended to a great portion of the state.2 Where such acts are not in force
there is no lien for alterations and repairs ;> but substantial and material additions
to an existing building are the subject of a lien.*
A copper kettle or boiler in a brew-house, is part of the freehold, and subject to
the mechanics’ lien law ;° so is the engine by which a steam saw-mill is propelled ;*
and burr mill-stones.’’ But buildings and fixtures erected by a lessee for years, for
the purposes of trade, are not the subject of a lien.®
One who furnishes nothing but his superintendence and skill as an undertaker of
a building, has no lien; nor has a journeyman.” An architect, however, em-
ployed to make the plans and drawings for a building, and to direct and oversee its
erection in accordance therewith, is within the provisions of the law; but a mere
architect, who only furnishes the plans and drawings, and performs no services in
the erection of the building, is not entitled to a lien.™
A mechanic is entitled to a lien for work done with derricks, in hoisting the
materials used in the construction of a building ; and for hauling the materials
used.“ And for furnishing paving bricks."
Materials furnished for a building, though not used in its erection, constitute a
lien ;5 but, although used, if not expressly furnished for the building, no lien is
acquired.’® One who furnishes materials to a sub-contractor has no lien ; the owner
and the contractor under him alone have power to bind the building.” Materials
furnished on the credit of a building immediately become the property of the
owner, and are not liable to be taken in execution for the debts of the contractor.”
But materials furnished upon the credit of a building must not exceed more than
could be reasonably used in its construction.’
If the building be removed or destroyed, before a claim is filed, the lien ceases as
to the ground; a lien against a former building is not good against one subse-
quently erected on the same land.” A vendee by articles of agreement, is an owner
within the meaning of the act; where mechanics’ liens are entered against an
equitable estate, their value depends upon that estate, and they survive or perish
with it.”
A mechanic’s claim is not a record; the lien-docket is the record, and 7¢ alone
affects incumbrancers and purchasers.” But it is valid as between the parties,
though not properly indexed.*
The execution of a prior judgment-creditor will be stayed, on the petition of a
subsequent mechanics’ lien-creditor, until the curtilage appurtenant to the building
has been set out.”
A prior mortgage has precedence of a mechanic’s lien ;* although given to secure
future advances.” A mortgage for purchase-money is entitled to priority over a
1 64 Penn. St. 454, 2 26 Penn. St. 246. 28 Ibid. 161.
1 Phila. 466. 25 Penn. St.
2 See infra, IT.
3 103 Peun. St. 537.
459 Ibid. 64. 83 Ibid. 111.
5 17S. & R. 413.
6 3 W. 140.
7 5 Ibid. 115.
8 9 Penn. St. 117.
But see infra, III.
94 W.& S. 257.
10 § Penn. St. 463. 12 Ibid. 237.
11 35 Ibid. 423. 90 Ibid. 47,153. 13 Phila. 497.
12 3 Phila. 261.
13 38 Penn. St. 151.
14 22 Ibid. 488. 2 W. N. C. 111.
Thid. 252.
1628. & R.170. 12 Ibid. 301. 2 Bro. 104. 10
Penn. St. 413. 18 Ibid. 52. 24 Ibid. 508.
16168. &R. 56. 86 Penn. St. 191.
1 27 Penn. St. 511. 10 W.N. C. 6.
18 18 Penn. St. 52.
199 Phila. 118. See 1 Penny. 22, 40. As to
when construction commences, see 14 W. N. C.
43. 2 Del. Co. R. 457
10 Ibid. 252. 14 Ibid. 118.
But see 9
212 W.N. 0. 33.
521.
22 36 Penn. St. 247.
23 35 Ibid. 485.
2 44 [bid. 76.
2 bid. 344.
26 1 Ash. 207.
275 Binn. 585. But the act § June 1881, Purd.
1322, provides, that all mechanics’ liens, for
work done or materials furnished for or about
the erection or construction of any building, shall
have priority of lien upon such building and the
curtilage thereto belonging, over any and all
mortgages thereon, recorded before the com-
mencement of such building, and granted by
the owner or owners to secure an advance or
advances of money, knowingly furnished by
the mortgagee or mortgagees for the erection
of such building, and shall be paid out of the
proceeds of any sale of said property before
such advance-money mortgage, except as to
an amount equal to the value of such curti-
lage or lot of ground immediately prior to
the commencement of said building; so that the
MECHANICS’ LIEN.
720
mechanic’s lien against the equitable estate of the vendee, under the contract of sale,
although dated more than sixty days prior to the time of delivery and recording,
and by agreement, made to a third person, who advanced the purchase-money ;’ but
the mechanics’ lien has reference to the first work done upon the ground.” A widow’s
exemption under the act of 1849, takes precedence of a mechanic’s claim ;* but a
valid lien is not defeated by subsequent proceeding in bankruptcy* =
When the plan of a building is changed and greatly enlarged, while it is in the
course of construction, the liens of mechanics and material-men, subsequently to
such change, relate only to the commencement of the alteration on the ground, and
are subject to all liens which then had fastened on the land.® :
A mechanic’s lien on an equitable estate attaches to the subsequently-acquired
legal estate ;* but not as against an intermediate mortgagee of the legal estate,
without notice ;? or a bond fide purchaser of the legal title.* A mere tenant for
years has not such an interest as will be bound by a mechanic’s lien ;® but a lessee
under an improvement lease, who has contracted to put up a valuable building upon
the land, has power to bind, by his contract with the mechanics and material-men, the
estate of his lessor.'°
A defendant sued as contractor and owner, may plead that he is neither owner
nor contractor." But the plaintiff’s right to recover on the scire facias does not
depend on the guantity of the defendant’s interest in the land”? Where a married
woman is the owner of the land, and her husband erects a building on it, with her
zonsent, it will be bound by a mechanie’s lien ;* but not, if it be filed against the
husband alone, without referring to the wife ;# in such case, however, the plain-
‘iff may have judgment against the husband’s title, so as, by a sale, to test the
ona fides of the wife’s ownership.®
The possession of the person whose title is to be incumbered, must be an actual,
not a constructive one.!® A person who furnishes materials to rebuild a house by
an insurance company, in pursuance of the terms of their policy, in place of one
consumed by fire, has no lien.”
The act of 1840 restrains, but does not enlarge, the right of the lien-creditor.™
A reference to the contract is unnecessary ; and where it has been performed,
the items of work and materials need not be set forth in the claim, when the
claim is filed by a contractor, under the act of 1845, or if the mechanic contracted
directly with the owner ; otherwise, if he contracted, not with the owner, but with
a contractor.” But it must contain a specification of the nature of the work and
materials, and of the particular building for which the same was done and furnished.#
Such sub-contractor will be held to a strict compliance with the act of 1836, in
setting forth the nature or kind of work done and amount of materials, the time,
&c., furnished.” A stipulation in the contract, that no lien shall be filed by the
contractor, will be enforced against him.”
The provisions of the mechanics’ lien law have been extended by statutes to
paper-hangers; to plumbing, gas-fitting and furnishing, and the erection of grates
and furnaces; to steam-engines, coal-breakers, or parts thereof, pump-gearing,
amount, equal to the value hereby excepted, shall
71 Ibid. 40. 86 Ibid. 191. 94 Ibid. 109. As to
be first appropriated to prior liens and incum-
what constitutes an improvement lease, see 86
brances, including such advance-money mort- Penn. St. 191. 11 W. N. ©. 359. 34 Leg. Int.
gages, before any part thereof shall be appliedto 58. 8 W.N. 0.418. 8 Luz. L. R. 209.
the payment of such mechanies’ liens; but the 1 1 Phila. 289.
proceeds of sale above the value shall be applied 12 1 Gr. 233. See 36 Ponn. St. 437.
to the payment of the mechanics’ liens, in prefer- 38 2 Pitts. 208. 5 W.N. 0. 448.
ence to such advance-money mortgages. 14 67 Penn. St. 463.
1 36 Penn. St. 247. 15 68 Ibid. 208.
2 83 Ibid. 111. 26 Pitts, R. L. 125. 2 Del. Co. 189 W. &S. 120.
R. 457. 1 Tbid. And see 78 Penn. St. 120. 102 Ibid.
8 39 Penn. St. 133. 593. 13 W.N. C. 395. 7 Leg. & Ins. R, 125.
4 Ibid. 449. 18 70 Penn. St. 98.
6 30 Thid. 122, And seo 28 Ibid. 156. 3 W. 1 9 Ibid. 97.
N. C. 289. 20 Thid. 449. 1 Phila. 52. 11 Ibid, 247. 12
§ 4 Ponn. St. 126. 25 Ibid. 521. Thid. 458.
7 28 Ibid. 247.
8 3 Phila. 337. Seed W. & S. 223.
® 70 Penn. St. 98, 9 Ibid. 117. See 5 W. 487.
8 Phila. 44. And infra, III.
10 36 Penn. St. 437. 40 Ibid. 63. 43 Ibid. 310.
21 66 Penn. St. 336.
22 13 Ibid. 497.
28 44 Ibid. 47. See 39 Ibid. 409. 3 Browst
163. 2 Clark 96.
24 93 Penn. St. 526. 11 W. N.C. 371
MECHANICS’ LIEN. 721
hoisting-gearing, fixtures or machinery in and about all kinds of mills, iron or coal
works, coal-mines and iron-mines ; also to wharf-builders, and all concerned in the
making or constructing of the same.! The lien given for gas-fitting does not include
gas-fixtures.?
II. Lign ror ALTERATIONS AND REPAIRS.
The general mechanics’ lien law of 1836 does not embrace claims for alterations
and repairs, but by the act Ist May, 1861 (and its supplements), it is provided, that
in the counties of Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Butler, Carbon, Centre, Chester, Dela-
ware, Erie, Lancaster, Lawrence, Lebanon, Lehigh, Lycoming, Monroe, Mont-
gomery, Perry, Susquehanna, Union, Venango, Warren and Wayne, that the act
of 1836, and its several supplements, shall apply to debts contracted for work done
or materials furnished for or about the repair, alteration of, or addition to any house
or other building, so that liens may hereafter be had for the payment of all debts
contracted for work done or materials furnished for or about the repair, alteration
of, or addition to, any house or other building, in the same manner as liens may now
be had for debts contracted for work done, or materials found, for or about the erec-
tion or construction of any house or other building under the act of 1836, and its
several supplements; with a proviso that it shall not extend to debts of less than $20
in amount.
In the city of Philadelphia, the act of 1st August 1868 provides, that the act of
1836 and its several supplements, shall apply to all debts contracted for work done
and materials furnished for, in or about the repair, alteration or addition to any
house or other building, in the same manner and to the same extent, as liens may
now be had and filed for debts contracted for work done and materials furnished for
or about the erection or construction of,any house or other building, under the
aforesaid acts and supplements thereto ; nothing in this act shall render property
liable to liens for repairs, alterations or additions, where the same has been done by
any lessee or tenant, without the written consent of the owner or owners, or their
authorized agent or agents ; a copy of which written consent must be filed with the
claim or statement; this act shall not apply to debts such as aforesaid, where
the same are for a less amount than fifty dollars: Provided, That nothing in this act
shall give a lien or render property liable for repairs, alterations or additions as afore-
sald, except from the time of filing a claim or statement of such work done and
materials furnished ; which claim or statement must be filed within six months after
such work shall have been finished or materials furnished; but no property shall
be rendered liable for repairs, alterations or additions as aforesaid, which shall have
been conveyed, before any such claim or statement shall have been filed, to pur-
chaser or purchasers thereof, by the party or parties contracting said debts.*
Under the act of 1868, where a landlord, in writing, extended the lease of his
tenants, in consideration that they would make certain improvements, at their own
cost, this was held not to be sufficient, within the act, to render the lessor’s estate
liable ; the consent intended is an absolute one, consistent with the right to do the
work on the credit of the building.®
A claim for alterations and repairs to several buildings, must be apportioned, or
it will be postponed to other creditors ;* where repairs are done to several houses,
the amount apportioned to each house must exceed $50.”
A claim for alterations and repairs, filed after the death of the owner of the pro-
perty, though within six months of the completion of the work, is entitled to no
Northampton, Pamph. 840. The act of 1861 is
179 Penn. St. 408. 2 W. N.C. 426. 15 Phila.
264 extended to all counties by act 18 May 1887,
2 Purd. 1308.
3 Purd. 1310. See also the act 22 April 1863,
making a similar provision for Huntingdon
county, Pamph. 529; act 14 February 1867, as
to York, Pamph. 211; act 4 April 1867, as to
Dauphin, Pamph. 748; act 4 April 1867, for
Armstrong and Blair, Pamph. 755; act 20 March
1868, as to Cumberland and Franklin, Pamph.
407; act 13 April 1868, as to Monroe, Pamph.
946; and act 10 April 1869, for the county of
46
Purd. 1310, which also provides for the written
consent of owner, and notice to owner of an in-
tention to file lien.
4Purd. 1311. This act only applies to the
city of Philadelphia. But see act 1 April 1873,
as to Susquehanna and Wayne counties. Purd.
1311.
5 67 Penn. St. 183. See 29 Leg. Int. 36.
66W.N. 0. 12.
73 Ibid. 409.
722 MECHANICS’ LIEN.
priority over the general debts of the decedent.! An assignee for the benefit of
creditors is not a purchaser within the meaning of the act.’
III. Lien oN LEASEHOLDS AND FIXTURES.
Though the general act does not embrace leasehold estates, yet various local acts
have been passed by the legislature extending it to such interests ; for the provisions
of such statutes, which are too numerous for insertion in a work like the present,
the justice is referred to Purdon’s Digest 1312-16. The following judicial decisions
upon this subject are inserted for the general instruction of the business man :
The act of 9 April 1849 (Purd. 1312), does not authorize the filing of a lien
against the works of a gas company for pipes furnished for and laid as a distributing
main.®
The aet of 17th February 1868 (Purd. 1162) does not embrace private dwellings
erected by tenants, independent of the works.* But it embraces an _ice-
house, erected for the purpose of carrying on the business of storing and selling
ice.’ The lien must be filed specially against the leasehold interest. A railroad con-
structed by a lessee, for mining coal in the slope of a mine, is not an improvement
or fixture to which a lien will attach under the act.’ The lien can only be filed
against the specific improvement.®
Under the act of 8th April 1868 (Purd. 1313), there can be no lien against the
building for putting new machinery in an old mill. A claim not properly verified
will be stricken off.’
1V. OF THE CLAIM.
Every person entitled to such lien shall file a claim or statement of his demand
in the office of the prothonotary of the court of common pleas of the county in which
the building may be situate.4
Every claim as aforesaid must set forth—
1. The names of the party claimant and of the owner or reputed owner of the
building, and also of the contractor, architect or builder, where the contract of
the claimant was made with such contractor, architect or builder.
2. The amount or sum claimed to be due, and the nature or kind of the work
done, or the kind and amount of materials furnished, and the time when the materials
were furnished, or the work was done, as the case may be.
3. The locality of the building, and the size and number of the stories of the
same, or such other matters of description as shall be sufficient to identify the same.”
It shall and may be lawful for the person finding and providing materials for two
or more adjoining houses and other buildings, built by the same person, owner of
the same, and debtor for the said materials, to file with his claim thereof, an appor-
tionment of the amount of the same among the said houses and other buildings;
and each of the said houses and other buildings shall be subject to the payment of
its said apportioned share of the debt contracted, in the same manner as provided
by law in other cases.¥
The several laws of this commonwealth authorizing an apportionment of the amount
due for materials furnished to two or more buildings owned by the same person,
among the said buildings, shall extend to and shall authorize, in similar cases, an
apportionment for work done, and for work done and materials furnished, where the
same are furnished under one contract, as fully and in the same manner as is now
authorized and allowed in the case of materials furnished."
Tn every case in which one claim for materials shall be filed by the person pre-
ferring the same, against two or more buildings, owned by the same person, the
person filing such joint claim shall, at the same time, designate the amount which
he claims to be due to him on each of such buildings, otherwise such claim shall be
1 102 Ponn. St. 218. 8 62 Penn. Lt. 384, i
2 9 Phila. 117. 9 95 Thid. 371, aes
84.W. N.C. 504, 1077 Ibid, 86. 31 Leg. Int, 404.
472 Penn, St. 355, 70 Ibid. 98. 1 Act 16 June 18363 11. Purd. 1316,
5 42 Ibid. 68. And se 3 W. N. 0. 58. 12 Tbid. 2 12.
60 Penn. St. 395. 18 Act 30 March 1831 34, Purd.
1 54 Ibid. 192, See 62 Ibid. 405, 417. 14 Act 25 April 1850 38. Punt. iy,
MECHANICS’ LIEN. 723
postponed to other lien-creditors ; and the lien of such claimant shall not extend
beyond the amount so designated, as against other creditors having liens by judg.
ment, mortgage or otherwise.)
Every such debt shall be a lien as aforesaid, until the expiration of six months
after the work shall have been finished or materials furnished, although no claim
shall have been filed therefor ; but such lien shall not continue longer than the said
period of six months, unless a claim be filed as aforesaid, at or before the expiration
of the same period.?
It shall be lawful for any mechanic or material-man in the city or county of
Philadelphia, and county of Chester, who performs work and furnishes materials,
to include both in the same claim filed; and where the value or amount of the work
or materials can only be ascertained by measurement, when done, or shall be done
by contract for a stipulated sum, it shall be lawful to file a statement of the time
when the work was commenced and when finished, and of the aggregate price of
the work and materials.*
Whenever the items of a mechanic or material-man’s bill, for work done or mate-
rials furnished continuously towards the erection of any new building, are in any
part bond fide within six months before the filing of the claim therefor, the lien
shall be valid for the whole.*
Every claimant having a claim filed for work or materials, or both, who shali
afterwards proceed to perform further work, or furnish other materials, or both,
may make suggestion thereof on the same record, and filing a statement of the
amount and particulars thereof, which may be recovered with the original claim
under the writ ; but if the original claim shall have been sued out, then a separate
sctre facias may be issued for the supplemental claim.®
In all cases where a claim is now filed, or shall hereafter be filed, under the
provisions of the law to which this is a supplement, in which too many persons are,
by mistake, included as claimants, owners or reputed owners, contractors, architects
or builders, it shall be lawful for the court of common pleas of the proper county
* * * having jurisdiction, in which such claim shall be filed, to permit an amend-
ment of the same, by striking thereout the names of all such persons as may, by
mistake, be included therein.®
Whenever a mechanic’s claim or lien for labor or materials, filed in proper time
and in proper form, contains a sufficient description of the premises against which
it is filed, with the name of an owner or reputed owner, and a contractor, if there
be one, and the name of a claimant, it shall be sufficient notice of such claim to
purchasers-and lien creditors, although all the proper claimants in such case shall
not be named therein.”
In case of any mechanic’s claim or lien, filed according to existing laws, in any
county of this commonwealth, the court having jurisdiction in such case is hereby
authorized and required, in any stage of the proceedings, to permit amendments
conducive to justice and a fair trial upon the merits, including the changing,
adding and striking out the names of claimants, and by adding the names of
owners and contractors, respectively, whenever it shall appear to such court that
the names of the proper parties have been omitted, or that a mistake has been
made in the names of such parties, or too many or not enough have been joined in
such case: Provided, That- no amendment so allowed, shall have effect or pre-
judice the rights of bond fide purchasers for a valuable consideration without
notice, or the rights of other lien-creditors, when such purchase has been made, or
such other lien would otherwise be prior, if such amendment were not made or had
not been allewed.® ee
The claim may be signed by the party’s attorney, and filed by a surviving part-
ner; the law does not require a signing.” The firm name of the claimants is
sufficient ;” or their individual names, omitting the name of the firm.* The initial
1 Act 16 June 1836 313. Purd. 1317. & Act 11 June 1879 32. Purd. 1319.
2 hid. 3 14. 9 12 Penn. St. 45.
3 Act 24 Maroh 1849 3 2. Purd. 1318. 0 1 W.&S. 240. ;
4 Act 14 April 1855 32. Ibid. ll Mullen v. Moody, Dist. Court, Phila, 2%
5 Thid. 2 3. April 1848. MS.
© Act 9 April 1862 31. Ibid. 2 2W.& 8. 179.
T Act 11 June 1879 31. Ibid. 18 10 Penn. St. 186-9.
724 MECHANICS’ LIEN.
letter of the middle name may be omitted.!| A contractor and sub-contractor can-
not file a joint claim.?
The omission of the owner’s name is a fatal defect.’ One who was not owner at
the commencement of the building, but became so afterwards, need not be named ;*
it would not, however, be improper to do so.° A mechanic’s claim filed against the
owner of an unfinished building, as owner and contractor, for materials furnished
for its completion, after the sale, binds the lands in the hands of the vendee.®
The person who erected the building, and was owner when the work was done,
may be named as contractor ; and a subsequent purchaser joined as owner.’ Unless
it appear that there was a contractor, other than the owner, the name of a con-
tractor need not be set out in the claim.2 Naming wrong persons as contractors is
a fatal error ;® and so is the omission to name the contractor.” A claim may be
filed by a firm, one of whose members is named as contractor.”
A claim which omits a statement of the nature or kind of the work done, or the
kind and amount of materials furnished, is incurably defective.” A claim for work
and materials must state the amount claimed for each, as a distinct item ;? but the
bill of particulars annexed to a claim is deemed a part of it ;* if the work be done
by contract, for a round sum, no specification of items is required.” It is not neces-
sary to aver, in the claim filed, that the materials were furnished on the credit of
the building.’® /
The claim should state when the materials were furnished ;” it should state not
ouly that the work was done or the materials furnished within six months from the
entry of the claim, but upon its face, or by reference to some accompanying paper,
a date or dates must be given by which such allegation can be verified ;* but an
impossible date, in the bill annexed, will not vitiate it, if explained.’® In a claim
for work done or materials furnished under an entire contract, but one date need be
stated.” A statement that the work was done within six months last past, is good,
after verdict ;” or between two certain dates.”
If there be enough in the description, to identify the building, it is sufficient ;¥
certainty to a common intent is enough.* The amount of land claimed in the lien
filed, is not material, if the locality and the building be designated ;* but the lien does
not extend beyond the description in the claim filed.”
A claim for work done in the erection of a building therein described and appur-
tenances, is not sufficiently certaiv ;" but a claim for materials furnished in and
about the erection and construction of a building and appurtenances, describing the
building, and accompanied by a bill of particulars, wherein it was stated, that
the materials were delivered for the building in question, designating it, was held
sufficient.”
A mechanic is bound to file his claim with certainty sufficient to give creditors
and purchasers record-notice, and nothing less than certainty to a common intent
will affect them ;* but if there be enough in the description of the locality, and other
peculiarities of the building, to point out and identify it, with reasonable certainty,
it is a sufficient compliance with the requisitions of the act.®° If the claim be
110 Penn. St. 186. See 2 Clark 96. The acts 46. 3 Phila.110. 4 W. N.C. 559.
of 1862 and 1879, Purd. 1318, supra, provides 18 28 Penn. St. 153.
for amendments of the claim. 19 13 Ibid. 186. 37 Ibid. 125.
28 W. 478. 20 28 Ibid. 153.
811 W. N.C. 359. 12 Ibid. 244. 21 5 Ibid. 18.
44W.& S. 257. 22 14 Ibid. 167. And see 4 W. & S. 257. 5 Ibid.
5 5 Whart. 366. See 88 Penn. St. 124. 262. 6 Penn. St. 187. 7 Ibid. 394. 10 Ibid. 186.
6 2 Phila. 19. See 6 Penn. St. 187. 2 Clark 96. 14 Ibid. 56. 90 Tbid. 153. 93 Ibid. 346. 1 Phila.
™ 5 Whart. 366. 52. 5 Clark 169. 16 Leg. Int. 85. 4 W. N.C
8 10 Penn. St. 186. See 8 W. N. O. 76. 183.
® Hershey v. Odd Fellows’ Hall, Sup. Court,10 23 68 Penn. St. 263.
May 1853. MS. 24 1 Leg. Rec. R. 149. 4 W.N. C. 358.
10 37 Penn. St. 125, 25 28 Penn, St. 156.
1 3 Brewst. 98. 26 3R. 492. See 12S. & R. 301. 6 Whart. 187,
12 26 Ponn. St. 248. 3 Gr. 227, 1 Penn. St. 499. 2 [bid.76. 5 Ibid. 18. 10 Ibid.
18 6 Penn. St. 187. See 9 Ibid. 449. 1 Phila. 186.
B64, 27 13 Penn. St. 495.
14 32 5m. 57. 28 24 Ibid. 508. And see 1 Phila. 220-1.
15-1 Phila. 29. 20-18 Leg. Int. 86. ‘
16 16 Leg. Int. 85. 80 41 Penn. St. 39. 63 Ibid. 203. 8 W.N. C. 24.
w3W.& 8. 258. 9 Ibid. 183, 12 Penn. St.
MECHANICS’ LIEN. 725
insufficient, the proper course is, to move the court to strike it from the record ; or
to demur ; but such objection is waived by pleading to the sez. fa.2_ A special plea,
concluding to the court is, in effect, a demurrer.®> A claim cannot be stricken off
for matters dehors the record * but if one item of a claim be defective, it may be
stricken out.®
If the claimant can specify the particular work done to each house, he must file
separate claims.
An apportioned claim cannot be filed against two or more separate blocks of
buildings, situate on different streets ;' a mechanic’s lien filed against three dis-
tinct blocks of buildings, separated by streets, is null and void, upon its face® But
if all the buildings be on one lot, and the curtilages adjoin, although the houses be
on different streets, an apportioned claim may be filed ;° and a claim against two
blocks of buildings, separated by a private way, may be apportioned.”
A material-man who has furnished materials to one contractor, jointly and indis-
criminately, for the use of two buildings, owned by different persons, may apportion
his bill and file a separate claim against each building.! Where a mechanic has
performed work on two properties of the same owner, and a settlement is made,
acknowledging a certain balance due him, such balance may be a fair lien on either
one of the properties ; but it must be left to the jury to say, from the evidence,
whether the balance was so appropriated, or not; and if not, how much of the balance
was due upon the particular property against which the lien was entered.” Separate
writs of sez. fa. must be issued on an apportioned claim.
Where the materials were furnished on the 22d of January, a claim filed on the
23d of July, was held to be too late.’* It is enough, if the last item only was fur-
nished within the six months.* The time does not begin to run until extra-work
done at the request of the owner was finished, although the work which had been
specially contracted for, had been previously completed.® Where there is an entire
contract for plastering several houses for a gross sum, work done at one of them
will not keep the lien alive against the others upon which no work was done within
six months from the time of filing the joint claim.”
A church having been completed in February, bricks were furnished in May, to
erect a wall or curbing around the basement window, and a claim was filed in
November, embracing the bricks furnished to the whole building: it was properly
left to the jury to say, whether the wall erected in May was necessary to the com-
pletion of the building, and if it were so, the claim was filed in time. Where
there had been a cessation on the work for upwards of a year, after part of it was
done, and before it was completed, the question for the jury was, whether the last
work was done under the original agreement, without unreasonable delay, and with
the consent of the owners, or whether it was done under a distinct contract.’®
Where materials are furnished in pursuance of a contract, the limitation begins
to run from the date.of the last act done in execution of it. Thus, if
a contract be made with a bricklayer to do all the brick and stone work about the
erection of a building, including the laying of the pavement, the contract being
entire, a mechanic’s lien may be filed, within six months from the completion of the
work, although all of’ it may have been done, except the pavement, more than six
months before the lien was filed ; but if the laying of the pavement were under
a separate contract, the case would be different." Where materials are furnished
under a special contract, as, for the brick or lumber of a particular house, the lien
may be entered within six months after the delivery of the last item, for that is the
17 Ibid. 234. See 79 Ibid. 481,
15 W.&S. 262. 5 Penn. St.21. 3 Pitts.474. 11 13 Ibid. 167.
2 38 Penn. St. 471. 36 Ibid. 347. 2 Penny. 4/1.
3 92 Ibid. 146. 12 48 Penn. St. 195.
#10 Phila. 79. 1W.N.C.471. 2 Ibid. 644. a 2 Whart. 193. 7 W. & 8. 257.
86 Penn. St. 454. 42M. 241. 6 Phila. 48. 8 W.N. C. 255.
54 W.N. OC. 140. 18 2 Clark 96. 8 Phila. 303.
65 Leg. & Ins. BR. 19." See 2 W. N.C. 585. 18 12 Penn. St. 339.
108 eT - 17 30 Ibid. 129. And see 10 Phila. 535.
4 Ibid. 108.
1 15 Penn. St. 265. 18 10 Penn. St. 413.
8 85 Ibid. 130. 3 W.N. C. 495. 19 {8 Ibid. 160. See2 Ibid. 77. 90 Ibid. 153.
20 19 Ibid. 341-4. 83 Ibid. 111. 3 Gr. 204.
9 20 Penn. St. 443. See 1 Phila, 372. 9 Ibid.
118. 7 W. & 5. 383. . od 21 92 Penn. St. 489. See 90 Thid. 153. 87 Ibid,
10 80 Peun. St. 292. 93 Ibid. 422. 414
726 MECHANICS’ LIEN.
completion of the contract ; but a contractor who goes to a lumber-merchant, and
obtains lumber, as he needs it, for the job in hand, makes a new contract at each pur-
chase, and the statute bars all of the account more than six months old at the filing of
the lien.’ The plaintiff furnished machinery for a brewery ; after a short interval,a .
new plan was adopted, and a new building or addition erected, and furnished by
the plaintiff with machinery; the machinery in the old building was modified, to
adapt it to be run together with that in the new; and it was held, that these were
distiact erections, and that the plaintiff had no lien upon the original building, unless
his claim was filed within six months from the time of cts completion.?
It may be doubted, whether a claim can be amended, after the six months have
passed?
A claim for work and materials combined in a single charge, must state when
the work was begun and finished, so as to show that is was done within six months
from filing the claim.
V. PROCEEDINGS ON THE CLAIM.
The proceedings to recover the amount of any such claim, shall be by a writ of
scire facias :° Provided, That no such scire facias shall in any case be issued within
fifteen days previous to the return-day of the next term.
The writ of scire facias shall be served in the same manner as a summons,
upon the defendant therein named, if he can be found within the county, and
a copy thereof shall also be left with some person residing in the building, if
occupied as a place of residence, but if not so occupied, it shall be the duty of’ the
sheriff to afix a copy of such writ upon the door, or other front part of such
building.’
Upon the return of such writ, it shall be lawful for any other person, having
filed a claim as aforesaid, to cause to be entered on the record of the same suit
a suggestion, setting forth the amount and nature of his demand; and there-
upon he may have arule upon the defendant to appear and plead thereto, as in
other actions.®
If the defendant shall appear and plead to such suggestion, and issue, either in
fact or law, be joined upon any plea, such particular issue shall be tried and deter-
mined as in other cases ; if the defendant shall not plead to such suggestion, after
due notice, judgment shall be entered for the claimant filing the same, and the
amount of the claim shall be ascertained as in other cases. _
The execution for every such judgment shall be by a writ of devari facias :
Provided, That if the proceeds of such building and ground as aforesaid, shall not
be sufficient to pay the full amount of all debts due as aforesaid, for work done and
materials furnished, after deducting therefrom any prior liens upon the same, then
such debts shall be averaged, and the creditors aforesaid shall be paid in proportion
to their respective demands.
In every case in which any claim shall be filed against any building as aforesaid
and no scire facias shall have issued thereon, it shall be lawful for the owner of
such building, or any person interested therein, to apply, by petition, to the court in
which such claim shall be filed, setting forth the facts, whereupon such court may
grant a rule upon the party claimant, and others interested, to appear in court, at a
time to be fixed for such purpose, and on the return of such rule, may proceed in
like manner as if a scire facias had been issued by such claimant, and had been
duly served and returned.”
The lien of every such debt, for which a claim shall have been filed as aforesaid
shall expire at the end of five years from the day on which such claim shall have
been filed, unless the same shall be revived by scire facias, in the manner provided
by law in case of judgments, in which case such lien shall continue in like manner,
15 Clark 358. 12 Leg. Int. 6. 3 Gr. 204. But a publication of the writ was repealed by act 29
see 52 Penn. St.9. 2 Leg. & Ins. R. 18. March 1842 23. Pamph. 213
6 Penn. St. 432, . 8 Act 16 June 1836319: Purd. 1320. For
44 Thid. 47. See 88 Ibid. 124. form of suggestion, see 2 M. 162
42 Phila. 102. 3 Gr. 227, See 5 Clark 169. 4 9 Thid. 3 20, ;
W.N. C0. 140. 5 Ibid. 120. 12 Phila. 388, 10 Thid. 3 21.
read gone 1836 215. Purd. 1319. 11 Thid. ¢ 22.
id. 9 16. 2 Thid. g 23, i
7 Ibid. § 17, The 18th section which required der this section, io mae SSP ne a
‘MECHANICS’ LIEN. 127
for another period of five years, and so from one such period to another, unless
such lien be satisfied, or the same be extinguished by a sheriff’s sale, or otherwise,
. according to law.
In every case in which the amount of any claim as aforesaid shall be paid, or
otherwise satisfied, it shall be the duty of the claimant, or his legal representative,
at the request of the owner of the building, or of any other person interested therein,
and on payment of the costs, to enter satisfaction on the record of such claim, in
the office of the prothonotary of the court in which claim shall bave been entered,
which shall for ever thereafter discharge and release the same.”
If any person who shall have received satisfaction as aforesaid, shall neguiect or
refuse to enter satisfaction of such claim as aforesaid, within sixty days after request,
and payment of the costs of suit, as aforesaid, he shall forfeit and pay to the party
aggrieved any sum not exceeding one-half of the amount of such claim, to be reco-
vered as debts of a like amount are recoverabie.*
Nothing in this act contained shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect the
right of any person to whom any debt may be due, for work done, or materials fur-
nished, to maintain any personal action against the owner of the building, or any
other person liable therefor, to recover the amount of such debt.*
In all mechanics’ claims, the court having jurisdiction thereof may, upon the appli-
cation of any party in interest, require the claimant to file an affidavit of the amount
actually due thereon; and upon security, approved by the court in double said
amount, being entered in the manner to be prescribed by the court, or upon the
payment of the same into court, such security or money shall be substituted for
the premises against which the claim is filed, and shall abide the final judgment
of the court thereon ; and thereupon the said premises shall be released from the
lien of the said claim ; and in case the said claimant, upon due notice, shall neglect
or refuse to file such affidavit, the claim shall be stricken from the record, and cease
to be a lien against said premises.®
Tn all liens for materials furnished or work and labor done, the owner of the pre-
mises against which the same shall be filed, may move for a rule on the claimant to
sue out a writ of scire facias to the next monthly return-day ; if the rule be made
absolute, it shall be lawful for any party to appear and defend the same, as now
authorized by law, as to writs of scire facias; and if said claimant shall not issue a
scire facias in obedience to the rule, the court, on motion, shall strike the lien from
the record §
_ The security to be prescribed by the court having jurisdiction of any mechanics’
claim, under the fourth section of the act of 1868, sball be a bond and warrant of
attorney in double the amount of the claim, to be executed by the defendant or
defendants in said claim, and by one surety, to be approved by the said court, who
shall be an owner of real estate worth over and above all incumbrance, double the
amount of said claim, upon which bond judgment shall be immediately entered in
said court: Provided, however, That the lien of said bond shall be confined to the
particular real estate offered and approved by the said court as security.’
The remedy for the recovery of said claim for which security has been entered
as aforesaid, shall be by writ or writs of setre facias thereon, in the manner now
prescribed by law, and upon final judgments thereon, execution by writ of levart
fucias shall immediately issue against the real estate so substituted as security, for
the collection of the amount of said judgment.*
In the event of the money being paid into court, by reason of the said 4th sec-
tion of the said act, a suit in the nature of a feigned issue may be ordered by the
court, upon the application of any person interested, to decide upon the validity of
any claim for materials or labor furnished to or for such building?
The sez. fa. must conform to the claim.” There is no provision for bringing in a
purchaser as terre-tenant;" but if the claim be filed in the name of a firm, the
1 Act 16 June 1836 3 24, Purd. 1321. Philadelphia. :
2 Thid. 3 25. 7 Act 6 March 1873 31. Purd. 1322.
8 Thid. 3 26. 8 Ibid. 2 2.
4 Ibid. 2 27. 9 Ibid. ¢ 3.
5 Act 1 August 1868 2 4. Purd. 1321. 10 6 Penn. St. 187.
6 Ibid. 35. This act is limited to thecity of 44 W. & 8. 263.
728 MECHANIC®S’ LIEN.
names of the individual partners may be introduced in the sci. fa.’ If the party
die before the filing of the claim, the sci. fa, must issue against his legal repre-
sentatives.”
In the counties that have monthly return-days, the scire facias must issue at least
fifteen days before an intermediate return-day to which it is made returnable’ A
sci. fa. issued within fifteen days of areturn-day must be made returnable to the
second term.*
A service of the writ by copy, on A., and by putting up a copy in front of the
building, and nihil as to B., is a sufficient return ;° but if there be any person
residing in the building, a service by posting is insufficient ; a copy must be served
upon the occupant.® Where the sci. fa, was served on the contractor, and not on
the owner, but both pleaded, and the jury were sworn, and judgment was entered
generally, against both, it was held, that though irregular, yet, as there was no
personal liability imposed thereby on the owner, the judgment should not be
reversed,”
A mortgagee, subsequently to the commencement of the building, may appear
and take defence ;* and so, it seems, may judgment-creditors and other incum-
brancers ;° but the mere fact that a person has been notified as terre-tenant, does
not make him a party, or liable for costs.”
The proper general issue plea is “‘ nz debet,”" The claim not being a record, the
plea of nud tied record is bad ;* so is a plea denying that plaintiffs ever had any
claim, because it denies the legal conclusion, not the facts ;* so is a plea in bar,
averring that the materials were furnished on a credit which had not expired,
because it goes only in suspension of the remedy, and should be pleaded in abate-
ment. The short plea of “ no lien,” only tenders issue of fact, dehors the record;
it cannot be considered a demurrer, either general or special ; it is so uncertain,
that it should be stricken off, on motion ;'® so, the court will strike off a plea aver-
ring that the claim was null and void because it did not state the kind and amount
of materials, and the times when furnished.” The proper mode to take advantage
of such a defect, is, by motion to strike off the claim from the record ; the judg-
ment will not be arrested, after verdict, for such an irregularity ; it is waived, by
pleading to the scire facias.”
On the trial, the claim cannot be read in evidence ;7" except there be no negative
plea.* The formal validity of a mechanic’s lien is not put in issue by the plea
of payment ; and hence, under such plea, the claim may be read to the jury, as an
admitted cause of action.” The plaintiff’s book or original entries is evidence, to
prove that the materials were furnished at and for the particular building ;* and
if the book do not specify the building, it may be proved by parol. The bargain
between the plaintiff and the contractor is evidence as to the price of the materials;
but, it seems, the owner may show that the price agreed to be paid was too high,
beyond the fair market value; that the contractor had been careless of his interests,
or had not done as well for him as he would probably have done for himself.® A
debt due by the plaintiff to the contractor may be set of: and there cannot be
set-off against set-off.* The owner of a building erected by contract occupies the
position of a surety for the contractor ; and therefore, a binding agreement to give
time to the contractor, without the consent of the owner, discharges the latter from
12W.&S. 181. 16 1 Phila. 102. 3 W.N. 0, 156, 204.
23 Luz. L. Obs. 10. See 8 Luz. L. Reg. 230. 1” 2 Penn. St. 363.
2 Pears. 334. 185 W. & S. 262. 36 Penn. St. 347. 92 Ibid.
8 OW.N. C. 63 146.
4141. Bar 79. See 2 Leg. Reo. R. 159, 19 1 Phila, 181.
5 12 Ponn. St. 45. 5 W.N. OC. 403. 20 38 Ponn. St. 471. 36 Ibid. 347. 75 Ibid. 384.
67 W.N.C.16. And seo Ibid. 392. 2 Ibid, % 168. & R. 56.
487. 22-1 Gr. 233. See 43 Penn. St. 322-3.
7 6 Whart. 366, 23 36 Penn. St. 347.
8 1 Phila. 297. 24 2 Whart. 277.
9 10 Penn. St. 192. See 7 W. & S. 384. % 9 W. 304. 15 Penn. St. 268. 20 Ibid. 446,
10 19 Penn. St. 449, 38 Ibid. 296. 56 Ibid. 87. See 10 Ibid. 418. 62
11 See 102 Ibid. 145 Ibid. 9.
21W. & 8. 240, 28 § Clark 144,
18.1 Phila. 187. 27 13 Penn. St. 181.
4 Thid. B4W.&S. 19,
% 66 Penn. St. 336.
. MECHANICS’ LIEN. 729
the claim of the mechanic or material man.’ A claim for the erection of a building
is not supported by evidence of repairs.”
The contractor who employed the mechanics and material-men, cannot claim pro
rata with them, although he may have filed a claim. The costs are payable out
of the fund raised by a sale of the property, although the sci. fa. may not have
been prosecuted to judgment.‘
Where the defendant proceeds under the 23d section of the act, the plaintiff
cannot suffer a nonsuit on the trial.
The issuing of a sez. fa., within the five years, is sufficient to keep alive the lien ;*
but it must be duly prosecuted.” A sci. fa. to keep alive the lien may issue, pend-
ing proceedings for its enforcement ;* but such sez. fa. cannot issue, as independent
process.2 Where the plaintiff has been nonsuited, he may file another claim, if the
time for so doing has not expired, although the former claim remains on the records
of the court ;’° and the discontinuance of an irregular sez. fa., after an award, does
not affect the plaintiff’s right to proceed by a new writ."
A judgment for the defendant in a personal action, is a bar to a set. fa. on the
claim.” The right to file a lien is not extinguished, by the acceptance of a note for
the amount of the claim ; nor will the acceptance of a sealed note have that
effect ;* nor of a bond, and the entry of judgment on it.”
Where the lien has been discharged under the act of 1873, the proceeding by
scire facias is not proper for determining the rights of the plaintiff; he must pro-
ceed upon the bond, or if the money have been paid into court, an issue will be
awarded to determine what, if any amount, is due.!* It is too late to give security
under that act, when the case is called for trial.” If the owner has paid the con-
tractor in full, he is not a necessary party to the bond.’®
VI. CLAIMS FOR EXTRA COMPENSATION.
Two main causes unite to produce frequent disputes relative to builders’ claims.
Of these, the chief is to be found in that continual struggle of competition, which,
pervading every trade, causes the employer to beat down the contractor below a fair
price ; whilst on the other hand it induces the contractor to keep in the back-ground
many items which must eventually come forward. The other is the natural conse-
quence of those accidents and chances attendant upon all building transactions,
which makes the slightest deviation from the original plan, the source of many
heavy, and we must add, frequently, groundless charges by the contractor, under
the head of “ extras.’
A third, but comparatively insignificant source of contention, is to be found in
the architect’s specification. To any person who will consider for a moment the
multitude of provisions to be made in the erection even of an ordinary dwelling-
house—the intricacy of their nature, and the almost trifling minutiz of their
arrangement—it cannot appear extraordinary that some items should escape his
notice. Indeed, the wonder would seem rather to be, that so many are carefully
remembered, than that a few should be forgotten.
From whichsoever of these causes disputes between the contractor and his
employer originate, their nature is almost invariably the same—they are points of
construction, not matters of fact. In other words, the question at issue is not one
of workmanship, nor of price, but whether the subject of extra-claim forms.a part of
the contract or not.
All specifications have a schedule of conditions annexed, which, after alluding to
the completion of the building, payment of the money, &c., usually contain a clause
to the following effect: “ And also, that if the description of anything necessary to
complete the said building, according to the design expressed in the drawings,
or in the foregoing specification, or to be understood by fair inference therefrom, be
12 Phila. 72. But see 39 Penn. St. 226.
2 87 Penn. St. 460. 91 Ibid. 276.
8 1 Phila. 513.
£2 Whart, 122.
5 2M. 348. See 5 W. &S. 262. 65 Penn. St. 74.
§ 20 Penn. St. 319. 5 Phila. 171.
7 46 Penn. St. 372. 76 Ibid. 25.
83 W.N. C. 544.
9 14 Ibid. 485.
93 Ibid. 25.
10 Penn. St. 133.
5 Penn. St. 145.
2 Whart. 118.
4.W.&S.157. 12 Penn. St. 339.
2M. 214. 2 Bro. 297.
8S. & R. 59.
8 Phila. 26, 248.
11 Ibid. 196: contra, 3 W. N. C. 558.
3 Phila. 507.
And see 31 Leg. Int. 373.
730 MECHANICS’ LIEN.
omitted in the said specification or drawings, the contractor shall take no advantage _
of such omission or omissions, but shall supply whatever may be needed to complete
the whole, without any additional charge.” Me ; Snee
It is evident to the dispassionate reader of such a condition as this, that it is
intended to supply any trifling omissions on the part of the architect ; such omissions
being actually necessary to complete work directly specified to be performed: but,
as we have already stated, it is on this point that the disputes turn, and with refer-
ence to their several reading of this or a similar clause, the contending parties
usually join issue. .
The general principles on which a contractor, performing work under a special
agreement, and for a fixed price, shall be allowed to recover the value of any
additional work which may be ordered during the progress of the undertaking,
have been laid down by Lord Tenterden, C. J., in the case of Loveloch »,
King.!
The action was brought to recover the amount of a carpenter’s bill for alterations
in the house of the defendant. The work having been originally undertaken on a
contract for a fixed sum, alterations were subsequently made, on which the plaintiff
claimed to abandon the contract, and recover a measuring value price for the work
actually done. The original contract was for 62/. 10s.; there was some entirely
new work done, under a separate contract for 10/., and there were considerable
alterations and departures from the original plan, which, by the usual evidence, it
was shown that the defendant had seen and had not objected to, and, in some cases,
that he had expressly approved of them. Among these were the alteration and
enlargement of a window, which were proved to have occasioned an increased
expense of 5/. The defendant had paid 82/. in all. The plaintiff’s witnesses
stated the value of the whole work to be 140/.; the defendant’s witnesses estimated
it below the sum actually paid.
The chief justice, in summing up to the jury, observed, that the case, although
very common in its circumstances, involved a very important principle, and required
their very serious consideration. ‘In this case, as in most others of the kind, the
work was originally undertaken on a contract for a fixed sum. A person intending
to make alterations of this nature, generally consults the person whom he intends to
employ, and ascertains from him the expense of the undertaking ; and it will very
frequently depend on this estimate, whether he proceeds or not. It is therefore a
great hardship upon hin, if he is to lose the protection of this estimate, unless he
fully understands that such consequences will follow, and assents to them. In
many cases, he will be completely ignorant whether the particular alterations sug-
gested, will produce any increase of labor and expenditure; and I do not think,
that the mere fact of assenting to them, ought to deprive him of the protection of
his contract. Sometimes, indeed, the nature of the alterations will be such, that
he cannot fail to be aware, that they must increase the expense, and cannot there-
fore suppose that they are to be done for the contract price. But where the
departures from the original scheme are not of that character, I think the jury
would do wisely in considering, that a party does not abandon the security of his
contract, by consenting that such alterations shall be made, unless he is also
informed, at the time of the consent, that the effect of the alteration will be to
increase the expense of the work. Iu the present case, it is not pretended that
any such caution was given; and it does not appear to me, that any of the altera-
tions, except that of the window (the additional costs of which the money paid is
enough to cover), were of such a nature as necessarily to import an increase of
expense. The question, however, is entirely for the jury; and it is of great
importance, from the frequency of such cases, that they should adopt a correct
principle in its decision.’”’” The verdict was for the defendant.
The subject has also received the consideration of the supreme court of Penn-
sylvania, in Miller v, McCaffrey.2 There, the defendants, who were the building
committee of a congregation, had entered into a contract with the plaintiff for the
erection of a church edifice, according to a designated plan, and at a fixed price.
The contract contained the following stipulation : “ At any time during the progress
of the building, the committee reserves the right to direct any alteration or variation
11M. & Rob. 69. 29 Pann Sr 944
MECHANICS’ LIEN, 731
from the original plan, so as not to vary therefrom in any very essential manner, or
to cause any material extra expense to the building; but any alteration suggested
by them shall be made, and the expense, if any, shall be agreed upon at the time ;
but no extras shall be allowed, under any pretext whatever.”
The action was brought for extra work done upon the building. The evidence
was, that the plaintiff had made various alterations in the plan, by which the cost
of the building was increased. The price for one item only was agreed upon. But
the defendants knew of the alterations, and made no objections ; and some of them
at least approved of the acts of the plaintiff.
The court held that the defendants would not be liable for the increased cost of
the work, occasioned by such alterations, for which the price had not been agreed
upon as stipulated in the contract, except on proof of an express promise to pay for
it. And Rogers, J., delivering the opinion of the court, said: “The action can
only be maintained by clear and satisfactory evidence of a new, distinct and inde-
pendent contract between the parties, authorizing the alterations in the original
plan, and expressly agreeing to pay for them a certain fixed price, or what they
may be reasonably worth; short of full proof of these essential particulars, the
action cannot be sustained. It is obvious, that unless these principles are rigidly
enforced, it is worse than useless to enter into a special contract, or attempt to guard
against impositions sometimes ruinous to the owner.” And after referring to the
evidence io the cause, the learned judged continued: ‘“ We shall never be in want
of testimony of the kind above alluded to ; and it will follow, that the only possible
mode of escaping, for the owner (even if that can protect him), will be to absent
himself altogether, while the work is in progress. If the unhappy owner expresses
his satisfaction with the building, he is bound to give an additional compensation ;
nay, if he does not expressly dissent, he is still in the same category. In truth, he’
would be an unnatural and ill-natured man, who would not express satisfaction,
when he observes that the builder is more than fulfilling his contract—that he is
making a better job of it, in workmanship and plan, than he agreed to do. But
does it follow, that when improvements are made, without consultation with the
owner, to gratify the taste or laudable vanity of the contractor, that he shall be
compelled to pay the additional expense, if any there be, in direct opposition to the
words and spirit of his contract? The adoption of such a rule would be particu-
larly unjust here.” “It is an elementary principle, that a workman employed to
doa job, who adds extra work, without consulting his employer, cannot charge for
it.’ So, in Wilmot v. Smith,? where the plaintiff agreed to construct a printing-press,
with a cast-iron bottom, for the defendant, for 4/.10s.,.and he furnished him one with
a wrought-iron bottom, and sued for 5. 5s., it was held, that he could recover but
41. 10s., although the press was better, and the defendant did not object to it, or
offer to return it. This is a case very like the present, and rules it.”
VII. Forms oF CLAIMS.
FORM OF CLAIM BY A HOUSE-CARPENTER AGAINST ONE WHO IS OWNER AND CONTRACTOR, FOR
WORK AND MATERIALS FOR A BUILDING.
A. B. In the Court of Common Pleas for the county of ——,
© D — Term, 188-, No. —.
A. B., house-carpenter, of the county of ——, files this his claim for the payment of the
sum of —— dollars and —— cents, against all that certain story —— building,
containing in front —— feet, and in depth feet, and the lot or piece of ground on
which the same is erected, with the curtilage appurtenant thereto, situate on the
side of —— street, at the distance of —— feet from the side of street,
in the said county; the sum of dollars and —— cents, part of the sum claimed,
being a debt contracted for work, viz., carpenter’s work ; and the sum of - dollars and
—— cents, the residue thereof, being a debt contracted for materials, viz., bricks, lime,
sand, lumber and ironmongery ; done and furnished by the said A. B., within six months
last past, in, for and about the erection and construction of said building, of which the
aaid C. D. was and is the owner or reputed owner, and at his instance and request, he
being the contractor, architect and builder thereof; and the said A. B. claims to have a
lien on the said building and the lot or piece of ground and curtilage appurtenant to said
1 1 McCord 222. 23. & P. 453,
782 MECHANICS’ LIEN.
building from the commencement thereof, for the sum aforesaid, according to the act of
assembly in such case made and provided; and the said claimant hereto annexes a bill
of particulars of the amount of his said debt, showing the nature and kind of work done,
the kind and amount of materials furnished, and the time when the said work and
materials were done and furnished. (Plaintiff’s bill annexed:)
FORM OF CLAIM FILED BY A HOUSE-CARPENTER AGAINST C. D., OWNER, AND E. F., CONTRACTOR,
FOR WORK AND MATERIALS FOR A BUILDING.
ads } In the Court of Common Pleas for the county of ——,
vs.
©. D. and E. F. —— erm, 1S Noe
A. B., of the county of ——, house-carpenter, files this his claim for the payment of
the sum of ——- dollars and —— cents, against all that certain —— story (stone, brick
or frame) building, containing in front ——- feet, and in depth feet, and the lot or
piece of ground on which the same is erected, with the curtilage appurtenant thereto,
situate on the —— side of street, at the distance of feet from the corner of —-
street, in the county aforesaid ; the sum of —— dollars and —— cents, part of the sum
claimed, being a debt contracted for work, viz., carpenter’s work, &., and the sum of
dollars and cents, the residue thereof, being a debt contracted for materials,
viz., lumber, lime, bricks, &c., done and furnished by the said A. B., within six months
last past, in, for and about the erection and construction of the said building, of which
the said C. D. is the owner or reputed owner, and the said E. F. the architect, builder
and contractor for the said work and materials, at whose instance and request they were
done and furnished as aforesaid; and the said A. B. claims to have a lien on the said
building and lot or piece of ground and curtilage appurtenant to said building, from the
time of its commencement, for the sum aforesaid, according to the act of assembly in such
case made and provided; and said claimant hereto annexes a bill of particulars of the
amount of his said debt, showing the nature and kind of work done, the kind and amount
of materials furnished, and the time when the said work was done, and the said materials
furnished as aforesaid. (Plaintiff's bill annexed.)
FORM OF CLAIM FILED BY A BRICKMAKER, AGAINST ONE WHO IS OWNER AND CONTRACTOR, FOR
MATERIALS FURNISHED FOR TWO OR MORE BUILDINGS, WHERE THE AMOUNT CLAIMED IS
EQUALLY DIVIDED.
©. — Term, 188-, No. —.
A. B., brickmaker, of the county of , files this his claim for the payment of the
sum of —— dollars and —— cents, against all those certain story brick houses
[or buildings], situate in the of , in the county aforesaid, in —— street, between
and —— streets, each house being about feet in front, on said street, and
in depth —— feet, and the lots or pieces of ground and curtilages appurtenant to said
buildings ; the said sum of —— dollars being a debt contracted for materials, viz., bricks
furnished and provided by the said A. B., within six months last past, for and about the
erevtion and construction of the said buildings, of which the said C. D. was and is
the owner, or reputed owner, and at his instance and request, he being the contractor,
architect and builder thereof; and the amount claimed to be due on each of the said
buildings, for materials furnished and provided as aforesaid, is dollars and ——
cents, which the said claimant hereby designates according to the act of ussembly, in
such case made and provided, and claims to have a lien i on the said buildings and
appurtenances from the commencement of the same ; and said claimant hereto annexes
a bill of particulars of the amount of his said debt, showing the kind and amount of
materials furnished, and the time when said materials were furnished as aforesaid.
(Plaintiff's bill annexed.)
a La In the Court of Common Pleas for the county of ——,
FORM OF CLAIM FILED BY A BRICKMAKER, AGAINST C. D., OWNER, AND E, F., CONTRACTOR, FOR
MATERIALS FURNISHED FOR TWO OR MORE BUILDINGS, WHERE THE AMOUNT CLAIMED IS
EQUALLY DIVIDED.
vs. ;
C.D. ana BF. Term 188-, No. —.
A. B., brickmaker, of the county of
Behe In the Court of Common Pleas for the county of ——,
. files this his claim for the payment of the
sum of —— dollars and —— cents, against all those certain story brick houses,
situate in the —— of ——, in the county aforesaid, at the —— corner of —— and ——
streets [or as the case may be], each house being about —— feet in front on said
street, and —— feet in depth on said street, and the lots or pieces of ground
and curtilages appurtenant to said buildings ; the said sum of —— dollars and —— cents,
MECHANICS’ LIEN. 733
being a debt contracted for materials, viz., bricks furnished by the said A. B., within six
months last past, for and about the erection and construction of the said buildings, of
which the said C. D. was and is the owner, or reputed owner, and KE. F. the architect,
builder and contractor, for said materials, at whose instance and request they were fur-
nished as aforesaid ; and the amount claimed to be due on each of the said buildings for
the said materials is dollars and —— cents, which the said claimant hereby desig-
nates according to the act of assembly in such case made and provided, and claims to
have a lien for on said buildings and appurtenances, from the commencement of the same ;
and said claimant hereto annexes a bill of particulars of the amount of his said debt,
showing the kind and amount of materials furnished, and the time when said materials
were furnished as aforesaid. (Plaintiff’s bill annexed.)
FORM OF CLAIM FILED BY A BRICKMAKER AGAINST C. D., OWNER, AND E. F., CONTRACTOR, FOR
MATERIALS FURNISHED FOR TWO OR MORE BUILDINGS, WHERE THE AMOUNT CLAIMED IS
UNEQUALLY DIVIDED.
arog In the Court of Common Pleas for the county of ——,
C.D. and. EF. — Term 188-, No. —.
A. B., brickmaker, of the county of ——, files this his claim for the payment of the
sum of —— dollars and —— cents, against all those —— certain brick houses, situate
in ——, in the county aforesaid, in —— street, between —— and streets, and the
lots or pieces of ground and curtilage appurtenant to the said buildings; being a debt
contracted for materials, viz., bricks, &c., furnished by the said A. B., within six months
last past, for and about the erection and construction of the said buildings, of which the
said C. D. was and is the owner, or reputed owner, and E. F., the architect, builder and
contractor, for said materials, at whose instance and request they were furnished as afore-
said: and the said A. B. hereby designates the amount he claims to be due to him for the
same on each of the said buildings, as follows, viz.,on the northernmost of the said
buildings, which is a three-story [or as the case may be] brick house, feet in front
on said —— street, by —— feet in depth, and the lot or piece of ground and curtilage
appurtenant to said building, the sum of —— thousand dollars and —— cents; on the
southernmost of said buildings, which is a two-story [or as the case may be] brick house,
——- feet in fronton said street, by feet in depth, and the lot or piece of ground
and curtilage appurtenant to said building, the sum of ——— hundred dollars and ——
cents, according to the act of assembly in such case made and provided ; and claims to
have a lien on the said buildings and appurtenances for the same, from the time of their
commencement; and said claimant hereunto annexes a bill of particulars of the amount
of his said debt, showing the kind and amount of materials furnished, and the time when
said materials were furnished as aforesaid. (Plaintiff's bill annexed.)
FORM OF CLAIM FILED BY A BRICKMAKER AGAINST ONE WHO IS OWNER AND CONTRACTOR,
FOR MATERIALS FURNISHED FOR TWO OR MORE BUILDINGS, WHEN THE AMOUNT CLAIMED I9
UNEQUALLY DIVIDED.
Por In the Court of Common Pleas for the county of ——,
vs.
C. D. and E. F. —— Term 188-, No. —.
A. B., brickmaker, of the county of , files this his claim for the payment of the
sum of —— dollars and —— cents, against all those —— certain brick houses, situate
in the —— of , in the county aforesaid, in —— street, between —— and streets,
and the lots or pieces of ground and curtilages appurtenant to said buildings; being a
debt contracted for materials, viz., bricks furnished by the said A. B., within six months
last past, for and about the erection and construction of the said buildings, of which the
said ©. D. was and is the owner, or reputed owner, and at his instance and request, he
being the architect, contractor and builder thereof; and the said A. B. hereby designates
the amount he claims to be due for the same on each of the said buildings, us follows,
viz.,on the northernmost of the said buildings, which is a three-story [or as the case may
be| brick house, —— feet in front on said —— street, by —— feet in depth, and the lot
or piece of ground and curtilage appurtenant to said building, the sam of —— thousanc
dollars and cents ; on the southernmost of said buildings, which is a two-story [or as
the case may be] brick house, feet in front on said —— street, by feet in depth,
and the lotor piece of ground and curtilage appurtenant to said building, the sum of ——
hundred dollars and cents, according to the act of assembly in such case made and
provided ; and claims to have a lien on said building and appurtenances thereto for the
same, from the time of their commencement; and said claimant hereto annexes a bill
of particulars of the amount of his said debt, showing the kind and amount of materials
purchased, and the time when said materials were purchased as aforesaid,
(Plaintiff's bill annexed.)
734 MECHANICS’ LIEN.
FORM OF CLAIM FILED AGAINST ONE WHO IS OWNER AND CONTRACTOR, BY A BRICKLAYER,
FOR WORK.
ae ; In the Court of Common Pleas, for the county of ——,
7 —— Term, 188-, No. —.
C. D.
A. B., of the county of , bricklayer, claims, in his own right, a lien for the pay-
ment of the sum of —— dollars, against all that certain —— story brick house for
building], situate [describing the situation and size of the building] in the —- of —,
in the county aforesaid, and the lot or piece of ground and curtilage appurtenant to said
building; the said sum of —— dollars, being a debt contracted for work, viz., bricklay-
ing, &., done by the said A. B., within six months last past, for and about the erection
and construction of the said building, of which the said C. D. was and is the owner, or
reputed owner, and at his instance and request, he being the contractor, architect and
builder thereof: and said claimant hereto annexes a bill of particulars of the amount
of his said debt, showing the nature and kind of work done, and the time when said work
was done as aforesaid. (Plaintiff's bill annexed.)
FORM OF CLAIM FILED AGAINST C. D., OWNER, AND E. F., CONTRACTOR, BY A BRICKLAYER, FOR
WORK.
oe In the Court of Common Pleas for the county of —,
C.D. and E. F. a Pere Re, Nov
A. B., bricklayer, of the county of , files this his claim, in his own right, for work,
viz.: bricklayer’s work done for and about the erecting and constructing a certain ——
story brick building (or all that certain story brick messuage and tenement), situate,
kc. (here follows the description of its size and situation, or boundaries), in the —— of,
——, in the county aforesaid, of which C. D. was and is the owner, or reputed owner,
and EK. F. the architect, builder and contractor, for said work, done by the said A. B.,
within six months last past, to said building, at the instance and request of the said
E.F., contractor. This claim is filed as well against said building, as against the lot
_or piece of ground and curtilage appurtenant to the same; and the said A. B. annexes
hereto a statement of the particulars of the amount of his said debt, showing the nature
and kind of work done, and the time when said work was done, as aforesaid.
. (Plaintiff’s bill annexed.)
FORM OF CLAIM FILED BY A LUMBERMAN, AGAINST ONE WHO IS OWNER AND CONTRACTOR, FOR
LUMBER FURNISHED FOR ONE BUILDING.
A. st In the Court of Common Pleas for the county of ——,
CD. —— Term 188-, No. —.
A. B., lumber-merchant, of the county of ——, files this his claim, for the payment of
of the sum of dollars and cents, against all that certain story ——- mes-
suage and tenement, situate in , in the township of , in the county aforesaid, on
the north side of road, containing in front, on said road, —— feet, more or less, and
in depth about feet (or otherwise describing its situation, boundaries, &c.), and the
Jot or piece of ground and curtilage appurtenant to said building ; the said sum of ——
dollars and cents, being a debt contracted for materials, viz.: lumber furnished by
the said A. B., within six months last past, for and about the erection and construction
of the said building, of which the said C. D. was and is the owner or reputed owner, and
at his instance and request, he being the contractor, architect and builder thereof; and
the said A. B. claims to have a lien for the aforesaid sum of dollars and cents,
on the said building, and lot or piece of ground and curtilage appurtenant thereto, from
its commencement, according to the act of assembly in such case made and provided ;
and the said claimant hereto annexes a bill of particulars of the amount of the said debt,
showing the kind and amount of materials furnished, and the time when said materials
were furnished. (Plaintiff's bill annexed.)
FORM OF CLAIM FILED BY A LUMBERMAN, AGAINST C. D., OWNER, AND E, F., CONTRACTOR, FOR
LUMBER FURNISHED FOR ONE BUILDING.
A.B. | In the Court of Common Pleas for the county of ——,
vs.
tint oe
A. B., lumber-merchant, of the county of ——, files this his claim for the payment of
the sum of —— dollars and —— cents, against all that certain —— story messuage
and tenement, situate in ——, in the township of , in the county aforesaid, on the
south side of the —— road, containing in front, on said road, —— feet, more or less, and
MECHANICS’ LIEN. 735
in depth about —— feet, and the lot or piece of ground and curtilage appurtenant to said
building ; the said sum of —— dollars and —— cents being a debt contracted for mate-
tials, to wit, lumber furnished by the said A. B., within six months last past, for and
about the erection and construction of the said building, of which the said C. D. was
and is the owner, or reputed owner, and the said E. F. the architect, builder and con-
tractor for said materials, at whose instance and request they were furnished and provided,
as aforesaid ; and the said A. B. claims to have a lien for the aforesaid sum, on the said
building, and lot or piece of ground and curtilage appurtenant to said building, from the
commencement of the same, according to the act of assembly in such case made and
provided ; and said claimant hereto annexes a bill of particulars of the amount of the
said debt, showing the kind and amount of materials furnished, and the time when said
materials were furnished. (Plaintiff’s bill annexed.)
FORM OF CLAIM FILED BY LUMBER-MERCHANTS (PARTNERS), AGAINST ONE WHO IS OWNER AND
CONTRACTOR, FOR LUMBER FURNISHED FOR TWO OR MORE BUILDINGS, WHERE THE AMOUNT
CLAIMED 18 EQUALLY DIVIDED.
A. B. and ©. D., copartners, trading
under the firm of A. B. & Co. In the Court of Common Pleas for the county
a of ——, —— Term, 188-, No. —
A.B, and C. D., lumber-merchants in copartnership, trading under the firm of A. B. &
Co., of the county of ——, file this their claim, for the payment of the sum of —— dollars
and —— cents, against all those certain story houses, situate in the ——~
of ——, in the county aforesaid, in —— street, between —— and streets, each house
being about feet in front on said —— street, and in depth about —— feet, and the
lots or pieces of ground and curtilages appurtenant to said buildings; the said sum of
—— dollars and cents being a debt contracted for materials, viz., lumber found,
furnished and provided by the said A. B. and C. D., within six months last past, for and
about the erection and construction of the said buildings, of which the said E. F. was and
is the owner, or reputed owner, and at his instance and request, he being the contractor,
architect and builder thereof; and the amonnt claimed to be due on each of the said build-
ings, for materials found, furnished and provided, as aforesaid, is —— dollars and ——
cents, which the said claimants hereby designate, according to the act of assembly in
such case made and provided, and claim to havea lien for on said buildings and appurte-
nances, from the commencement of the same; and said claimants hereto annex a bill of
particulars of the amount of their said debt, showing the kind and amount of materials
furnished, and the time when the said materials were furnished, as aforesaid.
(Plaintiffs’ bill annexed.)
FORM OF CLAIM FILED BY LUMBERMEN (PARTNERS), AGAINST E. F., THE OWNER OR REPUTED
OWNER, AND G. H., CONTRACTOR, FOR LUMBER FURNISHED FOR TWO OR MORE BUILDINGS,
WHERE THE AMOUNT CLAIMED IS EQUALLY DIVIDED.
A.B. and C. D., copartners &c, (see
last form), In the Court of Common Pleas, for the county
of » —— Term, 188-, No. —.
vs.
E. F. and G. H.
A. B. and C. D., lumber-merchants, &c. (as per last form), of the county of ——,
file this their claim for the payment of —— dollars and --—— cents, against all those
—— certain —— story —— houses, situate in the —— of ——, in the county aforesaid,
between and streets, in —— street, each house being about —--- feet in front
on said street, and —— feet in depth, and the lots or pieces of ground and curtilages
appurtenant to said buildings; the said sum of —— dollars and --— cents being a debt
contracted for materials, viz., lumber found, furnished and provided, within six months
last past, by the said A. B. and C. D., for and about the erection and construction of the said
buildings, of which the said E. F. was and is the owner, or reputed owner, and the
,said G. H. the architect, builder and contractor for said materials, at whose instance and
request they were found, furnished and provided, as aforesaid; and the amount claimed
‘to be due on each of the said buildings for the said materials, is dollars and —--
cents, which the said claimants hereby designate, according to the act of assembly, in
such case made and provided, and claim to have a lien for on said buildings and appur-
tenances from the commencement of the same; and said claimants hereto annex a bill
of particulars of the amount of their said debt, showing the kind and amount of materials
furnished, and the time when said materials were furnished, as aforesaid.
(Plaintiffs’ bill annexed.)
736 MECHANICS’ LIEN.
FORM OF CLAIM FILED BY LUMBER-MERCHANTS (PARTNERS), AGAINST ONE WHO IS OWNER AND
CONTRACTOR, FOR LUMBER FURNISHED FOR TWO OR MORE BUILDINGS, WHEKE THE AMOUNT
CLAIMED I8 UNEQUALLY DIVIDED.
A. B. and C. D., copartners, trading }
under the firm of A. B. & Co. In the Court of Common Pleas for the county
vs. | of —, —— Term, 188-, No. —.
E. F.
A. B. and C. D., lumber-merchants, in copartnership, trading under the firm of A. B. &
Co., of the county of ——, file this their claim for the payment of the sum of —— dollars
and cents, against all those certain houses situate in the —-— of ——, in the county
aforesaid, in —— street, between and —— streets, Nos. — and —, and the lots or
pieces of ground and curtilages appurtenant to said buildings ; being a debt contracted
for materials, to wit, lumber furnished by the said A. B. and C. D., within six months
last past, for and about the erection and construction of the said buildings, of which the
said KE. F. was and is the owner, or reputed owner, and at his instance and_ request, he
being the architect, contractor and builder thereof: and the said A. B. and C. D. hereby
designate the amount they claim to be due to them for the same, on each of the said
buildings, as follows, viz., on the northernmost of the said buildings, which is a three-
story (or as the case may be) brick house, —— feet in front on said street, by—
feet in depth, and the lot or piece of ground and curtilage appurtenant to said building,
the sum of thousand dollars and cents ; on the southernmost of said buildings,
which is a two-story (or as the case may be) brick building, —— feet in front on said
street, by —-— feet in depth, and the lot or piece of ground and curtilage appurte-
nant to said building, the sum of hundred dollars and cents, according to the act
of assembly in such case made and provided, and claim to have a lien on said buildings
and appurtenances thereto for the sum aforesaid, from the time of their commence-
ment; and the said claimants hereto annex a bill of particulars of the amount of their
said debt, showing the kind and amount of materials furnished, and the time when said
materials were furnished, as aforesaid. (Pllaintiffs’ bill annexed.)
FORM OF CLAIM FILED BY LUMBER-MERCHANTS (PaRTNERS), AGAINST E. F., OWNER, AND G.H.,
CONTRACTOR, FOR LUMBER FURNISHED FOR TWO OR MORE BUILDINGS, WHERE THE AMOUNT
CLAIMED IS EQUALLY DIVIDED.
A. B. and C. D., copartners, &c., In the Court of Common Pleas for the
vs. county of ——, —— Term, 188-,
E. F. and G. H. No. —.
A.B. and C. D., lumber-merchants, &c. (as per last form), file this claim for the
payment of the sum of dollars and —— cents, against all those certain houses
situate in ——, in the county of , aforesaid, in —— street, between and ——
streets, and the lots or pieces of ground and curtilages appurtenant to said buildings ;
being a debt contracted for materals, to wit, lumber furnished by the said A. B. and
C. D., within six months last past, for and about the erection and construction of the said
buildings, of which the said H. F. was and is the owner, or reputed owner, and the
said G. H. the architect, builder and contractor for the said materials, at whose instance
and request they were furnished, as aforesaid; and the said A. B. and C. D. hereby
designate the amount they claim to be due to them for the said materials on each of the
said buildings, as follows, viz., on the northernmost of the said buildings, which is a ——
story brick house, —— feet in front on said street, by feet in depth, and the
lot or piece of ground and eurtilage appurtenant to said building, the sum of —— thou-
sand dollars and cents ; on the southernmost of the said buildings, which is a ——
story frame tenement, —— feet in front on said street, by feet in depth, and
the lot or piece of ground appurtenant to said building, the sum of dollars,
according to the act of assembly, in such case made and provided, and claim to have a
lien on the said buildings and appurtenances for the same, from the time of the com-
mencement; and said claimants hereto annex a bill of particulars of the amount of their
said debt, showing the kind and amount of materials furnished, and the time when the
said materials were furnished, as aforesaid. (Plaintiffs’ bill annexed.)
Form OF CLAIM AGAINST A LEASEHOLD INTEREST.
A. B.
vs. In the Court of Common Pleas for the county of
0. D., owner or reputed owner, and ——, —— Tern, 188-, No. —.
E. F., contractor.
A.B., of the of ——, files this his claim for the payment of the sum of ——
dollars, —— cents, against all —— certain —— story —— building and lot or piece of
MECHANICS’ UNIONS. 737
ground and curtilage appurtenant thereto, situate (describing it accurately). The said
sum of —— being a debt contracted for ——, at the request of the said C. D., by the
said E. F., within six months last past, for and towards the erection and construction of,
and on the credit of, the said building, at the times and in the quantities, in the annexed
bill of particulars mentioned, which said claimant prays may be taken and considered as
part of this lien against said building of which the said C. D. then was and now is the
owner or reputed owner, and the lessee of the said lot or piece of ground, and the said
E. F., contractor for the erection of said building, with whom the said contract was
made; and the said A. B. claims to have a lien on said building and on the leasehold
interest of the said C. D. in the said lot or piece of ground and curtilage appurtenant
thereto, for the amount of his said claim from the commencement of said building,
according to the act of assembly in such case made and provided. ‘
(Plaintiff's bill annexed.)
FORM OF CLAIM BY A HOUSE-CARPENTER FOR REPAIRS MADE BY A TENANT WITH THE CONSENT
OF THE LANDLORD.
A. B.
vs. In the Court of Common Pleas for the county
C. D., owner or reputed owner, and of Philadelphia, Term, 188-, No. —
E. F., lessee and contractor.
A. B., of the city of Philadelphia, house-carpenter, files this his claim for the payment
of the sum of dollars —— cents, against all that certain three-story brick dwelling-
house or lot or piece of ground and curtilage appurtenant thereto, situate on the ——
side of street, between —— and —— streets, No. —, in the —— ward of the city
of Philadelphia, containing in front on said —— street —— feet, and in depth —— feet,
the said sum of money being a debt contracted for work done and materials furnished, to
wit, carpenter work done and lumber, nails, &c., furnished by the said A. B., within six
months last past, to wit, between the day of —— 1869 and the —— day of
1870, in and about the repairing of the said building, of which the said C. D. was and is
the owner or reputed owner, and the said E. F. was and is the lessee or tenant and the
contractor with whom the contract of the said A. B. was made, and at whose request the
said work was done and the said materials furnished as aforesaid; and the said A. B.
hereto annexes a detailed statement or bill of particulars exhibiting the amount or sum
due, the nature or kind of the work done, the kind and amount of the materials furnished,
and the time when the said work was done and materials furnished. And he also
annexes a copy of the consent in writing of the said C. D. for the making of the said
repairs by the said E. F., the lessee ; and avers that at the time of furnishing the said mate-
rials he gave notice to the said C. D. of his intention to file a lien for the same, and he
claims to have a lien on said building and the curtilage appurtenant thereto, for the
amount of his said claim, from the time of filing this claim, according to the act of assem-
bly in such case made and provided.
(Plaintiffs bill annexed.)
Mechanics’ Cnions.
[See Trapzs-Untons. ]
Military Orders.
Act 1 June 1891. Purd. 523.
That any person who shall wilfully wear the insignia or rosette of the military order
of the Loyal Legion of the United States, or the badge or button of the Grand Army of
the Republic, or the badge or shield of the Union Veteran Legion, or the badge or shield
of the order Sons of Veterans, United States of America, or use the same to obtain
aid or assistance within this state, unless he shall be entitled to use or wear the same
under the constitution and by-laws, rules and regulations of such organization, shall
be guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction, shall be punished by a fine not to
exceed one hundred dollars.
[ 738 ]
Sih.
Act 20 Aprin 1869. Purd. 1332.
Sect. 1. The councils of cities and boroughs of this commonwealth are hereby
authorized and empowered to provide for the inspection of milk, under such rules
and regulations as will protect the people from adulteration and dilution of the
same.
Act 25 May 1878. Purd. 1332.
Szor. 1. Any person or persons, who shall knowingly sell or exchange, or expose
for sale or exchange, any impure, adulterated or unwholesome milk, shall be
deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and on conviction, shall be punished by a fine
of not less than twenty dollars for each and every offence; and if the fine be not
paid, shall be imprisoned for not less than fifteen days, or until said fine shall be
aid.
: Sxor. 2. Any person who shall adulterate milk, with the view of offering the same
for sale or exchange, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and on conviction,
shall be punished by a fine of not less than ten dollars for each and every offence ;
and if the fine be not paid, shall be imprisoned for not less than eight days, or until
said fine is paid.
Sror. 3. Any person or persons who shall, in any cities, boroughs and villages,
having a population of one thousand inhabitants and upwards, engage in or carry
on the sale, exchange or traffic in milk, shall have the carriage or vehicle from
which the same is vended conspicuously marked with his, her or their names, also
indicating the locality from whence said milk is obtained or where produced; and
for every neglect of such marking, the person or persons so neglecting shall be
subject to the penalties provided for in section second of this act.
Szor. 4. For marking wagons or vehicles, so as to convey the idea that said milk
is procured from, or produced in, a different locality than it really is, the person or
persons so offending shall be subject to a fine of fifty dollars, or imprisonment not
less than thirty days, or both, at the discretion of the court.
Sot. 5. The addition of water or of ice to the milk, is hereby declared an adul-
teration; any milk obtained from animals fed on distillery-waste or any substance
in a state of putrefaction, is hereby declared to be impure and unwholesome.
Act 10 JunE 1881. Purd. 1332.
Sect. 1. If any person or persons shall, with intent to defraud, sell, supply or bring
to be manufactured, to any butter or cheese manufactory in this state, any milk,
diluted with water, or in any way adulterated, unclean or impure, or milk from which
cream has been taken, or milk commonly known as skimmed milk, or if any person
or persons so furnishing milk as aforesaid, who shall keep back any part of the milk
known as “strippings,”’ or shall knowingly bring or supply milk to any butter or
cheese manufactory that is tainted or partially sour, or shall knowingly bring or supply
to any butter or cheese manufactory, milk drawn from cows within fifteen days before
parturition, or, within five days after parturition, shall for each offence forfeit and
pay a sum not less than ten dollars nor more than one hundred dollars, with costs of
suit, to be sued for in any court of competent jurisdiction for the benefit of the person
or set firm or association or corporation upon whom such fraud or neglect shall be
committed.
Act 7 July 1885. Purd. 1332.
Sect. 1. In cities of the second and third classes, whosoever, by himself or by his
servant or agent, or as the servant or agent of any other person, sells, exchanges
or delivers, or has in his custody or possession, with intent to sell or exchange or
exposes or offers for sale or exchange, adulterated milk, or milk to which water
or any foreign substance has been a” =
MILK. 739
substance in a state of putrefaction, or from sick or diseased cows, shall, for such
offence, be punished by fine of not less than twenty, nor more than one hundred
dollars.
Szcr. 2. Whoever, by himself or by his servant or agent, or as the servant or
agent of any other person, sells, exchanges or delivers, or has in his custody or pos-
session, with intent to sell or exchange, or exposes or offers for sale as pure milk,
any milk from which the cream or any part thereof has been removed shall, for
such offence, be punished by the penalty provided in the preceding section.
Szor. 3. No dealer in milk, and no servant or agent of such a dealer, shall sell,
exchange or deliver, or have in his custody or possession, with intent to sell, ex-
change or deliver, milk from which the cream or any part thereof has been removed,
unless in a conspicuous place above the centre upon the outside of every vessel, can
or package, from or in which such milk is sold, the words “skimmed milk” are
distinctly painted in letters not less than one inch in length. Whoever violates
the provisions of this section shall, for such offence, be punished by the penalty
provided in section one of this act.
Secor. 4. If the milk mentioned in sections one and two of this act is shown, upon
analysis, to contain more than eighty-seven and fifty one hundredth per centum of
watery fluid, and to contain less than twelve and fifty one-hundredth per centum
of milk solids, and less fat than three per centum, and if the specific gravity at
sixty degrees Fahrenheit is not between one and twenty-nine one-thousandths to
one and thirty-three one-thousandth, it shall be deemed to be adulterated.
Szcr. 5. If the skimmed milk mentioned in section three of this act, is shown,
upon analysis, to contain less than six per centum of cream by volume, and less
than two and five-tenths per centum of fat by weight, and if the specific gravity at
sixty degrees Fahrenheit, is not between one and thirty-two thousandths, to one
and thirty-seven thousandths, it shall be deemed to be adulterated.
Sect. 6. Whenever the inspector of milk has reason to believe that any milk
found by him is adulterated, he shall take specimens thereof and test the same
with such instrument or instruments as are used for such purpose, and if the result
of such test indicates that the milk has been adulterated or deprived of its cream,
or any part thereof, the same shall be prima facie evidence of such adulteration,
in prosecutions under this act. If the said inspector shall deem it necessary he
shall cause such milk to be analyzed, the result of which analysis he shall record
and keep as evidence, and a certificate of such result sworn to by the analyzer shall,
be admissible in evidence in prosecutions under this act. The expense of such
analysis, not exceeding fifteen dollars in any one case, may be included in the costs
of such prosecutions.
Sscr. 7. It shall be the duty of the inspector of milk to commence proceedings,
in the name of the board of health, for any violations of the provisions of this act,
from his own knowledge, or on information of any persou giving satisfactory evi-
dence to him of such violations, before any mayor, deputy-mayor, or alderman of
said cities. The recovery of fines or penalties imposed and inflicted on any person
by the provisions of this act, shall be for the use of said board of health, and upon
non-payment of the fines or penalties imposed and inflicted as aforesaid, such person
shall be committed to the county jail for a period not exceeding thirty days.
Sxor. 8. In addition to the fines mentioned in the foregoing sections of this act,
any person or persons violating the same, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor,
and, upon conviction thereof, shall be liable to a fine of not less than fifty, nor more
than one hundred dollars, or by imprisonment in the county jail for not less than
ten, nor more than thirty days, or both or either, at the discretion of the court.
[ 740 ]
PiNT-eDams,
I. Statutory provisions. II. Judicial decisions.
J. Act 23 Maron 1803. Purd. 1304.
Szor. 8. If the owner or owners of any raft, boat or other vessel, or other per-
son having the charge thereof, shall be obstructed, or suffer damage, or shall be
delayed in his or their passage on any stream within the jurisdiction of this com-
monwealth, that now is, or hereafter may be, declared a public highway, by any dam
or dams as aforesaid, or fish-dam or other device whatsoever, made or erected in an
stream, which was declared by law to be a public stream or highway, within the
jurisdiction of this commonwealth, before the time the damage actually happened,
it shall be the duty of any justice of the peace of the county where such dam or
dams as aforesaid, or fish-dams, or other device, is or are made or erected, on appli-
cation of the owner or owners of the raft, boat or other vessel or of the person
having the charge thereof, to cause the owner of such dam or dams, or other device,
forthwith to appear before him, the said justice ; and if, on the appearance of the
said owner, the parties cannot agree in respect to the damage alleged to be done, or
in the choice of referees to determine the same, it shall be the duty of the
said justice forthwith to appoint three disinterested persons, whose duty it shall be
to view the injury so sustained, and inquire into the loss occasioned by delay, and
make an estimate thereof, on oath or affirmation, if such oath or affirmation is
required by either of the parties ; and it shall be the duty of such justice of the
peace forthwith to award judgment, and issue execution in a summary manner, for
the amount, witb costs of suit: Provided, however, That the said damages, so to be
recovered, do not in the whole exceed the sum of fifty dollars; but if damages
shall be alleged to a greater amount than fifty dollars, the same may be sued for
and recovered in the court of common pleas of the county wherein the said damages
shall have been sustained : And provided also, That appeals shall be allowed from
the judgment of the justice of the peace, given for damages as aforesaid, to the
court of common pleas, as in other cases.’
II. The erection of a dam which causes the formation of an obstruction in the
stream below, subjects him who erected or maintains it to any damage which such
obstruction may occasion to a navigator.2 The person who erects a dam must con-
struct a schute which will enable a navigator to pass safely by the exercise of
ordinary care and skill, with a raft constructed with the usual skill.
In an action for obstructing a stream made navigable by law, if it appear that
the injury to the plaintiff arose from causes which might have been foreseen, such
as ordinary periodical freshets, or the collection of ice, he, whose superstructure is
the immediate cause of the mischief, will be liable to damages; but if the injury
be oceasioned by an act of Providence, which could not have been anticipated, the
defendant will not be liable.‘
Persons passing such dams are required to use ordinary care, diligence and skill ;
but where these are used, and the dam is such an obstruction as to occasion loss to
those attempting its passage, the one erecting or maintaining it must answer in
damages, no matter what was the stage of the water at the time of passing it.
The term “ raft,” used in this act, is applicable to a number of logs, not fastened
together, but floated in the stream contiguous to each other.
1 This act is constitutional. 51 Penn. St. 96. 49W.119.
103 U. S. 9, and cases cited. 5 12 Penn. St. 81. 57 Ibid. 487.
24 W. 437. See 52 Penn, St. 320. ® 15 Ibid, 9.
8 57 Penn. St 487.
[ 741 ]
Misleasance,
MISFEASANCE is the improper performance of some act which might lawfully be
done. An action on the case lies against an officer for maliciously executing pro-
cess, in an oppressive and unreasonable manner, with intent to vex, harass and
oppress the party. As, where a constable, having a warrant against the plaintiff
for a military fine, refused to take property tendered by him, but took and sold his
horse, with the avowed intent of hurting his feelings, and otherwise vexing him.?
An action on the case lies against a justice of the peace for a false return to a
certiorari brought to reverse his judgment, notwithstanding the judgment was
affirmed by default of plaintiff in error.’
No action lies, at the suit of an individual, against a public officer, for misbehavior
in office, either for misfeasance or non-performance, unless the plaintiff can show
a special damage peculiar to himself.* No action lies for merely bringing a suit
without sufficient ground.®
An action lies against an innkeeper for goods lost or stolen out of his inn, without
proving negligence.®
Money.
Current and lawful money are synonymous." The word specie is synonymous
with gold and silver, real efficient money, solid coin or current money
When foreign money is the object of the suit, the settled rule is, that the value
must be fixed according to the rate of exchange at the time of trial.®
A payment in current bank-notes discharges the debt, although, in consequencs
of the previous failure of the bank, of which both parties were ignorant, the notes
were of no value at the time of payment.’
If a payment or receipt of money, in coin or bank-notes, be proved, without
showing of what denomination, it will be presumed that the coins or bank-notes
were of the lowest denomination in circulation.
Congress has the undoubted right to issue paper money, and make it a legals
tender.? So, they have power to issue base coin; though it is about as honest as
if the government should tax its own bonds.
11 Chit. Pl. 135. T 1 Dall. 126
25 Johns. 125. But see 24 Penn. St. 308. 75 8 4Y. 95.
Ibid. 467. 76 Ibid. 191. 958. & RB. 48,
314 Johns, 195. 2 Dall. 114. 1 1W. & S. 92.
419 Johns. 223. ll 2 Greenl. Evid. 3 129 a.
5 10 Ibid. 156. @ 110 U.S, 421. 52 Penn. St. 9.
6 14 Ibid. 175.
[ 742 }
Pame.
I. How names of persons may be changed. II. Judicial decisions and authorities,
I. Act 9 Aprit 1852, Purd. 1574.
Sror. 1. It shall be lawful for the court of common pleas of any county of this
commonwealth, to make a decree, changing the name of any person, resident in said
county, at any time three months after being petitioned to do the same by such person:
Provided, That notice of the decree, after the same shall be made, shall be published
in one or more newspapers, to be designated by the court, for four successive weeks.
’ Sxor. 2. Every person whose name shall be so changed, shall, before the entering
of the decree, pay to the prothonotary of said court, in addition to the costs of pub-
lication, ten dollars, two dollars whereof shall be retained by the said prothonotary
as and for his fees in the matter, and the remainder shall be received by him for
the use of the state, as and for a tax upon the decree.
The act of 15th April 1859 provides, that when the name of the parent of a
minor child or children, then under the care of such parent, shall be changed, the
new name of such parent shall, thereafter be borne also by such minor child or
children.?
II. The addition of junior to a name is mere description of the person, and the
omission of it does not affect or invalidate any act or proceeding done by the same
person.” An initial letter interposed betwixt the Christian and surname is no part
of either.®
A variance or mistake in the names of parties to a contract, whether individuals
or corporations, is not fatal to their contract, if there can be a sufficient descrip-
tion of the parties whereby they are known.‘
Where two names have the same original derivation, or where one is an abbre-
viation or corruption of the other, but both are taken, promiscuously and according
to common use, to be the same, though differing in sound, the use of one for the
other is not a material misnomer. Whether Harry and Henry are the same name,
so that an attainder of Harry Gordon by the name of Henry Gordon is valid, dubi-
tatur®
In cases of pleas of misnomer, questions of identity, &c., the change of the letters
of a name which does not alter the sound, is not a fatal variance, as Shackspere for
Shakspeare. But in an indictment for forgery, &c., which professes to set out an
instrument in hee verba, the change of a letter is fatal, though the word be idem
sonans [sounding the same].
Identity of name is ordinarily, but not always prima facie evidence of persona!
identity. Identity of name is something from which an inference may be drawn,
unless the name be a very common one, or the transaction remote."
By act of 4th May 1852, the several courts of this commonwealth have power,
in all actions brought therein, and in all cases of judgments entered by confession,
“in any stage of the proceedings, to permit amendments, by changing or adding the
name or names of any party, plaintiff or defendant, whenever it shall appear to them
that a mistake or omission has been made in the name or names of any such party.’”®
The act of 27th April 1855 provides that illegitimate children shall take and be
known by the name of their mother.®
1 Purd. 1574. 1 2 Penn. St. 182. 25 Ibid. 183. 68 Ibid. 200.
27 . 049, 98 Ibid. 133. 105 Ibid. 577, 2 @r. 44. 1 Clark
8 4 W. 329. 9 Phila. 32. 323. 5 Tbid. 300.
410 Mass. 360. 8 Purd 100.
oe C. 0. 285. ® Ibid. 1574,
[ 743 ]
Negligence.
I. Provisions of the Penal Code. III. Judicial decisions and authoriti
IT: Civil liability for death caused by negligence. aoe
I. Provisions oF THE Prenat Cops.
Ig any person shall be maimed, or otherwise injured in person, or injured in
property, through or by reason of the wanton and furious driving, or racing, or by
reason of the gross negligence or wilful misconduct of the driver of any ‘publie
stage, mail-coach, coachee, carriage or car, employed in the conveyance of passen-
gers; or through or by reason of the gross negligence or wilful misconduct of any
engineer or conductor of any locomotive engine or train of railroad ears or Carriages ;
or any captain or other officer of any steamboat employed in the conveyance of
passengers, or of goods, wares, merchandise or produce of any description; such
driver, engineer, conductor, captain or officer, shall, on conviction thereof, be sen-
tenced to pay a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars, and undergo an imprison-
ment, by separate or solitary confinement, or by simple imprisonment, not exceeding
five years: Provided, That the provisions of this act shall not interfere with the
civil remedies against the proprietors and others, to which the injured party may
by law be now entitled.t
If any person or persons in the service or employ of a railroad or other trans-
portation company, doing business in this state, shall refuse or neglect to obey any
rule or regulation of such company, or, by reason of negligence or wilful miscon-
duct, shall fail to observe any precaution or rule, which it was his duty to obey and
observe, and injury or death to any person or persons shall thereby result, such
person or persons so offending shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and on
conviction thereof shall be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding five thousand dol-
lars, and to undergo an imprisonment in the county jail, or in the state penitentiary,
not exceeding five years: Provided, That nothing in this act shall be construed
to be a bar to a trial and conviction for any other or higher offence, or to relieve such
person or persons from liability, in a civil action, for such damages as may have been
sustained.?
It shall be the duty of the prosecuting attorney of the city or county where any
such injuries may have happened, as soon as he shall have notice of the same, to
take immediate action and legal measures for the apprehension and arrest,of the
person or persons who may be charged with causing the injuries as aforesaid, and’
to direct subpanas to issue from any justice of the peace to witnesses, to appear
and testify on the part of the commonwealth touching such offences charged as
aforesaid, and to prosecute the offenders as in other cases of misdemeanor: And
provided further, That no conviction of the employees shall relieve the company
from any liability for any such injuries or death.*
IL. Crviu LIABILITY.
No action hereafter brought to recover damages for injuries to the person by
negligence or default, shall abate by reason of the death of the plaintiff, but the
personal representatives of the deceased may be substituted as plaintiff, and prose-
cute the suit to final judgment and satisfaction.*
Whenever death shall be occasioned by unlawful violence or negligence, and no
suit for damages be brought by the party injured during his or her life, the widow
of any such deceased, or if there be no widow, the personal representatives, may
maintain an action for and recover damages for the death thus occasioned.
The persons entitled to recover damages for any injury causing death, shall be
the husband, widow, children or parents of the deceased, and no other relative ;
1 Act 31 March 1860 H 29. Purd. 505. * Act 15 April 1861 318. Purd. 1603.
2 Act 22 March 1865 91. Purd. 534. 5 Thid. 2 19. ¥
3 Thid. 3 2.
744 NEGLIGENCE.
and the sum recovered shall go to them in the proportion they would take 7 or
her personal estate, in case of intestacy, and that without liability to creditors."
The declaration shall state who are the parties entitled in such action ; the action
shall be brought within one year after the death, and not thereafter? ;
When any person shall sustain personal injury or loss of life while lawfully
engaged or employed on or about the roads, works, depots and premises of a rail-
road company, or in or about any train or car therein or thereon, of which company
such person is not an employee, the right of action and recovery in all such cases
against the company shall be such only as would exist if such person were an em-
ployee: Provided, That this section shall not apply to passengers. ;
In all actions now or hereafter instituted against common carriers, or corporations
owning, operating or using a railroad as a public highway, whereon steam or other
motive power is used, to recover for loss and damage sustained and arising either
from personal injuries or loss of life, and for which, by law, such carrier or corpo-
ration could be held responsible, only such compensation for loss and damage shall
be recovered as the evidence shall clearly prove to have been pecuniarily suffered
or sustained.‘
III. A railroad company is responsible for the sufficiency of its road, and it is
only necessary to show an injury to person or property, sustained through the neg-
ligence of the company or its officers, to recover.’ :
In an action against a railroad company for an injury to a passenger, occasioned
by the negligence of the defendants and their servants, held, that the mere fact of
the accident (a collision with another train) having occurred, was prima facie evi-
dence of negligence on the part of the defendants.®
The plaintiff travelling in a railroad car, permitted his hand to be extended out-
side of the window, whereby his arm was broken in passing a bridge; the carrier
is not liable for the injury if he gave timely warning of the danger, which the
plaintiff might have avoided, Whether such warning was given—and if so, whether
it was heard by the plaintiff, is a matter of fact for the jury. To show such warn-
ing, it is admissible for the defendant to prove that an agent of the road had notified
another passenger of the danger, who sat so close to the plaintiff that the latter
must have heard the notice.”
In the case of excavations, more especially in public places, it is the duty of those
owning or having them in charge, so to guard and fence them, or, at least, to give
such warning notice of their existence, as will be sufficient to prevent others using
ordinary caution from falling into them. There is no distinction between the
respoysibility of an employer for the acts of an ordinary agent or servant, and of a
contractor for the erection of a building.®
When, in a city, a horse attached to a carriage is found running on the side-walk,
to the injury of citizens, the law will presume negligence on the part of the owner;
and he is liable in such case for the carelessness or neglect of his servant.”
Under the act of 26th April 1855, the damages to be recovered by the surviving
relations for an injury resulting in death, are confined to such as are capable of a
pecuniary estimate; nothing is to be allowed for the mental sufferings of the sur-
vivors, or the corporeal sufferings of the injured party. In case of the loss of a
minor son, the measure of damages is, the pecuniary value of his services during
his minority." A parent may recover for the death of an adult son, if the family
relation be shown to continue.”
The sum to be recovered is the pecuniary loss which the plaintiffs have suffered
from the death of their relation; nothing can be recovered as a solatium for wounded
feelings, or by way of vindictive damages."®
The statute applies, though the injury and death occurred in another state, if the
laws of such state give a like remedy."
1 Aot 26 April 1855 3 1. Purd. 1603. Ibid. 84. 97 Ibid. 70. 93 Ibid. 449. 96 Ibid. 83.
2 Thid. 3 2. 7 8 Ibid. 479,
: Act 4 April 1868 2 1. Ibid 1604, § Bright. 489. 16 Penn. St. 463,
4 Ibid. 3 2. See Const. art. IIT, 2 12. 9 [bid. Seo 2 Greenl. Evid. 3 68, 232 a.
5 11 Penn. St. 141. 30 Tbid. 242. 10 Bright. 68. 15 Penn. St. 188,
8 30 Ibid, 242. 1 Phila. 543, 13 Leg. Int. 4. 4 33 Ponn. St. 318,
6 Exch. 787. But this rule only applies to onses 12 :+55 Ibid. 409.
of injury to a passenger. 90 Pann. St.135. 94 18 36 Ibid. 298.
Ibid. 351. In other cases, the burden of proving 16 W.N. 0. 381. 103 U. 8.11.
the defendant’s negligence is on the plain___
[ 745 J
RNotary-Public.
I. Acts of assembly, extracts from II. Judicial decisions.
I. Act 5 MarcH 1791. Purd. 1608.
Scr. 7. Every notary shall provide a public notarial seal, with which he shall
authenticate all his acts, instruments, and attestations, on which seal shall be engraved
the arms of tis commonwealth, and shall have for legend the name, surname and
office of the notary using the same, and the place of his residence.
Szcr. 8. The said notaries so commissioned as aforesaid, and every of them, shall
have the power of administering oaths and affirmations according to law, in all matters
belonging or incident to the exercise of their notarial office; and all and every person
and persons that shall be legally convicted of having wilfully and knowingly made
or taken a false oath or affirmation, before any notary or notaries, in any matter or
matters within his or their official duty, shall suffer the pains and penalties of wilful
and corrupt perjury.
Sect. 4. The said notaries, and every of them, shall have the power to receive the
proof or acknowledgments of all instruments of writing relating to commerce or
navigation, such as bills of sale, bottomries, mortgages and hypothecations of ships
or vessels, charter-parties or affreightments, letters of attorney, and such other
writings as have been usually proved or acknowledged before notaries within this
commonwealth ; and also to make declarations, and testify the truth thereof, under
their seals of office, concerning all matters by them done in virtue of their respective
offices.
Sect. 10. Every of the said notaries shall keep fair registers of all official acts by
them done in virtue of their office, and shall, when thereunto required, give a certified
copy of any record in his office unto any person or persons applying for the same;
such person or persons paying the customary fees therefor.
Act 10 Avausr 1864. Purd. 1610.
Sgcr. 1. Each notary-public of this commonwealth shall have power to take depo-
sitions and affidavits, to take and receive the acknowledgment or proof of all deeds,
conveyances, mortgages or other instruments of writing, touching or concerning any
lands, tenements or hereditaments, situate, lying and being in any part of this state ;
and also power to take and receive the separate examination of any feme covert,
touching or concerning her right of dower, or the conveyance of her estate, or right
in or to any such lands, tenéments or hereditaments, as fully, to all intents and pur-
poses whatsoever, as any judge of the supreme court, or president or associate judge
of any of the courts of common pleas, or any alderman or justice of the peace,
within this commonwealth; and the fees to be received by said notaries-public, shall
be the same as are now allowed by law to the aldermen and justices of the peace
for similar services.
746 NOTARY-PUBLIC
Src. 2. All acknowledgments or proof of conveyances. mortgages or other instru-
ments of writing, made before any notary-public of this commonwealth, under and
by virtue of a supposed authority given by an act authorizing notaries-public in this
state, and in any state or territory in the United States, to take acknowledgments
of deeds and letters of attorney, and to confirm acknowledgments heretofore made,
approved April 22d, Anno Domini 1863, shall be as valid, to all intents and purposes,
and be in like manner entitled to be recorded, as if the same had been duly acknowl-
edged or proven according to the previously existing laws of this commonwealth.
Act 5 May 1893. Purd. 1610.
All affidavits, acknowledgments or other notarial acts heretofore performed, or
which shall hereafter be performed, by notaries-public of this commonwealth outside
the place within which they have been commissioned to reside, but within the com-
monwealth otherwise in conformity with the requirements of the law, shall be valid to
all intents and purposes as if the same had been performed according to previously
existing laws of the commonwealth: Provided, however, That no case heretofore judi-
cially decided, or now pending, shall be affected by this act.’
Act 2 JANUARY 1815. Purd. 1609.
Sxcr. 1. The official acts, protests and attestations of all notaries-public (acting
by the authority of this commonwealth), certified according to law, under their re-
spective hands and seals of office, may be read and received in evidence of the facts
therein certified, in all suits that now are or hereafter shall be depending: Provided,
That any party may be permitted to contradict, by other evidence, any such certificate.
Act 14 DecemBer 1854. Purd. 1609.
Srct. 1. The official acts, protests and attestations of all notaries-public, certified
according to law, under their respective hands and seals of office, in respect to the
dishonor of all bills and promissory notes, and of notice to the drawers, acceptors or
indorsers thereof, may be received and read in evidence as proof of the facts therein
stated, in all suits now pending or hereafter to be brought: Provided, That any party
may be permitted to contradict, by other evidence, any such certificate.
oO
Act 27 ApriL 1876. Purd. 1609.
The official acts and exemplifications of foreign notaries, in accordance with the laws
of their respective countries, shall be prima facie evidence of the matters therein set
forth: Provided, That the consul or vice-consul of the United States at or near the
place where such notaries-public may reside, shall certify on (under) his consular seal
that such notaries are the proper officers, and that such official acts and exemplifica-
tions are in accordance with the laws of their respective countries; which seal affixed
to the said consular certificate shall be presumed prima facie to be the genuine consular
seal, and shall be evidence that the person so certifying was, at the date of the certifi-
cate, an acting consul or vice-consul, as represented, that the signature is his genuine
handwriting, and that the seal was affixed thereto by him: Provided, however, That
any party may be permitted to contradict, by other evidence, any such acts, exemplifi-
cations or certificates.
133 W.N. C. 347.
NOTICE. TAT
II. A protest for non-payment must appear under a notarial seal.1_ The certificate
of a notary-public, under his notarial seal, is prim@ facie evidence that the person
signing the certificate is a commissioned notary.? ‘
A notarial protest is evidence, under the act of 1815, of notice to the indorser
of a promissory note, of non-payment by the maker.
After the protest of a notary has been given in evidence by the plaintiff, in a
suit against the indorser of a promissory note, the defendant may call the notary to
explain the protest, and even, it seems, to contradict it.¢ And he may be compelled
to testify against the truth of his certificate of protest. ,
The books of a notary, proved to have been regularly kept, are admissible in
evidence, after his death, to prove a demand of payment, and notice of non-payment
of a promissory note.®
A protest made by a notary, who is a stockholder in the bank, is not admissible
evidence to charge the indorser.’
The protest of a notary-public is admissible in evidence, under the act of 1815,
however insufficiently or defectively the words may be stated with respect to demand
and notice; the question of the sufficiency arises afterwards.®
By the law-merchant, a notary cannot present bills for acceptance or payment by
a clerk or deputy, and protest them on his report.?
eS
Potice.
A NOTICE, in legal proceedings, means a written notice, and in calculating time,
in all notices, one day is to be taken inclusive, and the other exclusive.” It seems,
that a verbal notice will not affect a party, unless given to him in person.!
Where a rule of court requires notice to be given to the opposite party, notice to
his attorney is not sufficient.? Where an act of assembly requires reasonable notice
to be given by one party to the other, ten days, generally, would be sufficient."
A party is not bound to produce a paper, unless the opposite party has given him
notice for that purpose."
Whatever puts the party upon inquiry, amounts to notice, in judgment of law,
provided the inquiry become a duty, as in case of purchasers and creditors, and
would lead to the knowledge of the requisite fact, by the exercise of ordinary dili-
gence and understanding. But notice of a rumor of a conveyance or incumbrance
seems not to be considered as actual or implied notice.”
If one, in the course of his business, as agent, attorney or counsel for another,
obtain knowledge from which a trust would arise, and afterwards become the agent,
attorney or counsellor of a subsequent purchaser, in an independent and uncon-
nected transaction, his previous knowledge is not notice to’ such other person for
whom he acts.
Constructive notice is evidence of notice, the presumption of which is so violent,
that the courts will not allow of its being contradicted.1"
Payment of a judgment to the nominal plaintiff, after actual notice that it has
been assigned to another, is not a payment to the proper person. And it is not
necessary that direct notice of the assignment be given by the assignee or his agent ;
it is sufficient, if the information be given by circumstances, and in terms calculated
to arrest the attention of the debtor.
A notice to a plaintiff in an action before a justice, to enter satisfaction on the
judgment, may be properly served by leaving a copy with his wife, at the dwelling-
house,”
11 Dall. 193. But see 78 Penn. St. 161.
2658. & BR. 484. i 2 Whart. 193.
8 Thid. 484, 324. 4W.&S.505. And see45 12558. & R. 352. 16 Ibid. 126,
Penn. St. 193. 8 Leg. & Ins. Rep. 212. B1P. & W. 462,
4108S. & R. 377. 14 1 Johns. 340.
5 12 Ibid. 284. 167 W. 261. 31 Penn. St. 331. 2 Pars. 17.
: 8 Wheat. 326, 20 Johns. 160. a eae a ot
2 Wz 141. : , : i enn. St. :
8 1 Whart. 486. 17 29 Penn. St. 154,
92Bay 410. 3 Hill53. 7 N.Y. 269. 24 Tex. 1% 25 Ibid. 80.
311 19 31 Ibid. 469.
103 Johns. 209. 2 Ibid. 261. Bright. 121.
[ 748 ]
Nuisance.
I. Provisions of the Penal Code. II. Obstruction of private roads by railroad
1. Disorderly houses. companies,
2. Bawdy-houses, III. Judicial decisions.
3. Public nuisances.
4. Gaming-tables and lotteries.
I. Act 31 Marca 1860. Purd. 491.
1, Sect. 42. If any person shall keep and maintain a common, ill-governed and
disorderly house or place, to the encouragement of idleness, gaming, drinking, or
other misbehavior, to the common nuisance and disturbance of the neighborhood
or orderly citizens, he or she shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and on conviction,
be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars, or to undergo an
. imprisonment not exceeding one year, or both, or either, at the discretion of the
court.
2. Sect. 48. If any person shall keep and maintain a common bawdy-house, or
place for the practice of fornication, or shall knowingly let or demise a house, or part
thereof, to be so kept, he or she shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and, on conviction,
be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding one thousand, dollars, and to undergo an im-
prisonment not exceeding two years.*
3. Szcr. 73. Any person who shall erect, set up, establish, maintain, keep up or
continue, or cause to be erected, set up, established, maintained, kept up or continued,
any public or common nuisance, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and on conviction,
shall be sentenced to pay a fine, and suffer an imprisonment, or either, or both,
according to the discretion of the court under the circumstances of the case; and
where the said nuisance shall be in existence at the time of the conviction and
sentence, it shall be lawful for the court, in its discretion, to direct either the defend-
ant or the sheriff of the proper county, at the expense of the defendant, to abate the.
same: Provided also, That all obstructions to private roads, laid out according to law,
shall be nuisances, which would be nuisances in cases of obstructions to public roads
or highways.”
4. The 73d section of the act to which this is a supplement shall be extended to
apply to any person who shall be legally indicted, in any court of criminal jurisdiction
within this commonwealth, of the crime of keeping or exhibiting any gaming-table,
device or apparatus to win or gain money or other property of value, or of engaging
in gambling for a livelihood, or of aiding and assisting others to do the same; and
also to any person who may be legally indicted in any such court of selling tickets or
policies in any unlawful lottery.’
II. Acr 12 Apri 1851. Purd. 1810.
w
Sor. 2. Any chartered railroad company in this commonwealth obstructing or
impeding the free use or passage of any private road or crossing-place, by standing
burdened cars or engines, or piacing other obstructions on any railroad, wherever any
1 Purd. 478. 2 Ibid. 524, + Act 2 April 1870. Purd. 510.
NUISANCE. 749
private road or crossing-place may be necessary to enable the occupant or occupants
of land or farms to pass over any railroad with horses, cows, hogs, sheep, carts, wagons
and implements of husbandry ; shall, for every such offence, after any agent or other
person in the employment of any railroad company shall have received at least fifteen
minutes’ verbal notice to remove burden cars, engines or other obstructions from any
private road or crossing-place that may pass over any railroad, be liable for a penalty
of thirty dollars, which shall be for the use of the person or persons aggrieved, and
which shall be recovered before any justice of the peace, in the same manner that
debts not exceeding one hundred dollars are by law recoverable. And in all suits or
actions that may be brought against any railroad company for the recovery of said
penalty of thirty dollars, the service of legal process on any agent or other person in
the employment of any railroad company shall be as good and available in law as if
made on the president thereof.
Ill. Nuisance, or annoyance, signifies anything that worketh hurt, inconvenience
or damage. There are two kinds of nuisances; public or common nuisances, which
affect the public; and private nuisances, which may be defined anything done to
the hurt or annoyance of the lands, tenements or hereditaments of another. If a
man build his house so close to mine that his roof overhangs my roof, and throws
the water off his roof upon mine, this is a nuisance, for which an action will lie.!
If one erect a house, or other building, so near to mine that it obstructs my
ancient lights and windows, it is a nuisance.?
If a person keep his hogs or other noisome animals so near the house of another,
that the stench of them incommodes him and makes the air unwholesome (Lord
Mansfield has said, that “it is not necessary that the smell should be unwholesome,
it is enough if it renders the enjoyment of life and property uncomfortable’’),® this
is an injurious nuisance, as it tends to deprive him of the use and benefit of his
house; a like nuisance is, if one’s neighbor sets up and exercises an offensive
trade. But depriving one of a mere matter of pleasure, as, of a fine prospect, by
building a wall, or the like, this, as it abridges nothing really convenient or neces-
sary, is no injury to the sufferer, and is, therefore, not an actionable nuisance.‘
If one erect a house for smelting lead so near the land of another that the vapor
and smoke kill his corn and grass, and damage his cattle therein, this is held to be
a nuisance , and by consequence, it follows, that if one do any other act, in itself law-
ful, which yet being done in that place necessarily tends to the damage of another’s
property, it is a nuisance, for it is incumbent on him to find some other place to do
that act, and where it will be less offensive.
Tt will be a nuisance, if life be made uncomfortable by the apprehension of danger ;
it has, therefore, been held to be a nuisance (a misdemeanor) to keep great quanti-
ties of gunpowder near dwelling-houses.®
Some actions, which would otherwise be nuisances, may be justified by necessity ;
thus a man may throw wood into the street, for the purpose of having it carried
into his house, and it may lie there a reasonable time; so, because building is
necessary, stones, brick, sand and other materials may be placed in the street, pro-
vided it be done in the most convenient manner; so, a merchant may have his
goods placed in the street, for the purpose of removing them to his store in a reason-
able time, but he has no right to keep them in the street for the purpose of selling
them there.’
An action cannot be supported for an obstruction to a highway, which is a com-
mon nuisance, but by a person who has suffered some special damage.*
The erection of a building upon a public square, in a town or city, is a public
nuisance, which may be abated by the party aggrieved, so as it is done peaceably
and without any riot.® A grant will not be presumed of a part of a publi¢ square
or street, from the lapse of time, so as to bar an indictment for a nuisance.”
1 3 Bl. Com. 215. 6 2 Str. 1167.
21 Pars, 494. 2Am. L. J. 14. 7158. &R. 219.
8 3 Burr. 337. 8 1 Binn. 463.
4 3 Bl. Com. 217-18. 92 W.23. 3 Penn. St. 202.
‘6 [bid. 218. 4 De G. & Sm. 815. 10 1 Whart. 469.
750 OATHS AND AFFIRMATIONS.
Tf a person entitled to raise water to a certain height, by means of a dam, raise it
higher than he is entitled to do, the person injured may reduce the dam to the
proper height, but he has not the right to demolish it.* ie
Lapse of time will not change the nature of a nuisance, because statutes of limit-
ation run not against the public.? .
All erections of every kind, adapted to sports or amusements, having no useful
end, and notoriously fitted up and continued in order to make profit for the owner,
are regarded by the common law as nuisances. :
A pig-sty, in a city, is per sea nuisance. ‘“ There are some trades so necessarily
offensive, that merely carrying them on within the limits of a populous city, is in
itself a nuisance: the law is perfectly well settled that a hog-pen in a city is
a nuisance.” In Commonwealth v. Hutz, Judge Parsons applied the same
doctrine to the rural districts of Philadelphia county— The principle is the
same everywhere,” said the learned judge, “if persons will locate their piggeries
near a public road, they must take the necessary care to keep them in such a
cleanly state as not to annoy the passengers along the road.’’ :
It is a public nuisance, and indictable at common law, to place on the footway of
a public street, a stall for the sale of fruit and confectionery, although the defend-
ant pay rent to the owner of the adjoining premises, for the use of so much of the
pavement as is occupied by him® The obstruction of a highway was indictable at
common law.
It isa public nuisance, at common law, to stand on the side-walk of a public
street, with others, and to hawk about newspapers, to the annoyance of the passers-by ;
thereby preventing the transit of passengers, and their free entry and egress to and
from places of business.’
One who lets his house for the purpose of keeping a bawdy-house, cannot be con-
victed on an indictment which simply charges in general terms the offence of keeping
a bawdy-house ; the facts must be specially set forth.®
Oaths and Affirmations.
I. Statutory provisions, III. Forms of administering oaths.
II. Judicial decisions and authorities.
I. Aor 31 May 1718. Purd. 1613.
Szcr. 3. All and all manner of crimes and offences, matters and causes whatso-
ever to be inquired of, heard, tried and determined, by virtue of this or any other
act or law of this province or otherwise, shall and may be inquired of, heard, tried
and determined by judges, justices, inquests and witnesses, qualifying themselves
according to their conscientious persuasion, respectively, either by taking a corporal
oath, or by the solemn affirmation allowed by act of parliament® to those called
Quakers in Great Britain; which affirmation of such persons as conscientiously
refuse to take an oath shall be accounted and deemed, in the law, to have the full
effect of an oath, in any case whatsoever in this province. And all such persons as
shall be convicted of falsely and corruptly affirming or declaring any matter or thing,
which if the same had been upon oath, would by law amount to wilful and corrupt
perjury, shall incur the same penalties, disabilities and forfeitures, as persons con-
vieted of wilful perjury.
Aot 21 Marca 1772. Purd. 1614.
Sor. 1. All and all manner of crimes, offences, matters, causes and things what-
soever, to be inquired of, heard, tried and determined, or done or performed by
virtue of any law in this province or otherwise, shall and may be inquired of, heard,.
1 5 Whart, 584, 7 5 Law Rep. 222, And see 37 Leg, Int. 234.
27 W.450. 4 Clark 104. 8 4 Clark 398,
8 5 Hill 121. ; 9 8 Geo. I. ¢. 6, which authorizes an affirmation
44 Clark 104. Bright. 69. 2 Pars. 92. in the following form: I do solemnly, sincerely,
; ee - and truly declare and affirm, &c.”
id. 318.
OATHS AND AFFIRMATIONS. 751
tried and determined, by judges, justices, witnesses and inquest, and all other per-
sons qualifying themselves, according to their conscientious persuasion, respectively,
either by taking the solemn affirmation, or any oath in the usual and common form
by laying the hand upon and kissing the book, or by lifting up the right hand,
and pronouncing or assenting to the following words: “I, A. B., do swear by
Almighty God, the searcher of all hearts, that I will , and that as I shall
answer to God at the great day.’ Which oath so taken by persons who con-
scientiously refuse to take an oath in the common form, shall be deemed and taken
in law, to have the same effect with an oath taken in the common form.
II. An oath is an outward pledge, given by the person taking it, that his attesta-
tion or promise is made under an immediate sense of his responsibility to God.
The administration of an oath supposes that a moral and religious accountability is
felt to a Supreme Being, and this is the sanction which the law requires upon the
conscience, before it admits a person to testify.?
All witnesses are to be sworn according to the peculiar ceremonies of their own
religion, or in such manner as they may deem binding on their own consciences.
If the witness be not of the Christian religion, the court (or justice) will inquire as
to the form in which an oath is administered in his own country, or among those
of his own faith, and will impose it in that forme If, being a Christian, he has
conscientious scruples against taking an oath in the usual form, he will be allowed
to make a solemn religious asseveration, involving alike appeal to God for the truth
of his testimony, in any mode which he shall declare to be binding on his conscience.
III. ForMs oF ADMINISTERING OATHS AND AFFIRMATIONS.
FORM OF OATH OF A WITNESS BEFORE A JUSTICE BY KISSING THE BOOK.
You do swear, that the evidence you shall give, in the issue trying before me, wherein
A. B. is plaintiff, and C. D. is defendant, shall be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing
but the truth: So help you God!
OATH OF A WITNESS BY LIFTING UP THE RIGHT HAND.
You do swear by Almighty God, the searcher of all hearts, that the evidence you shall
give, in the issue trying before me, wherein A. B. is plaintiff, and C. D. is defendant,
shall be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth: And that as you shall
answer to God at the great day.
AFFIRMATION OF A WITNESS.
You do solemnly, sincerely and truly declare and affirm, that the evidence you shall
give in the issue trying hefore me, shall be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but
the truth: And so you affirm:
VOIR DIRE TO BE ADMINISTERED TO A WITNESS TOUCHING HIS COMPETENCY 5 OR TO A PARTY
OFFERED TO PROVE HIS OWN BOOK OF ORIGINAL ENTRIES.
You do swear, that you will true answers make to such questions as shall be asked you
touching the matter now before me: So help you God !
OATH OF AN INTERPRETER.
You do swear, that you will truly interpret between the justice, the counsel and the
Witness, in the issue now trying, wherein A. B. is plaintiff, and C. D. is defendant: So
help you God!
1 Tyler on Oaths 15, 1 Green]. Evid. 3 328, 3 1 Greenl. Evid. 2 371.
2 6 Mason 18,
[ 752 }
Oflicers, Public,
[See EMBEZZLEMENT.]
IL. Provisions of the Penal Code. II. Judicial decisions,
I. Aor 31 Marca 1860. Purd. 532.
Szor. 62. If any officer of this commonwealth, or of any city, borough, county or
township thereof, shall loan out, with or without interest or return therefor, any
money or valuable security received by him, or which may be in his possession, or
under his control by virtue of his office, he shall be guilty of a misdemeanor in
office, and, on conviction, be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding one thousand
dollars, and undergo an imprisonment, by separate or solitary confinement, at labor,
not exceeding five years ; and if still in office, be adjudged thereafter incapable of
exercising the same, and the said office shall be forthwith declared vacant by the
court passing the sentence.’ A ;
Sgor. 63. If any such officer shall enter into any contract or agreement with any
bank, corporation or individual, or association of individuals, by which said officer
is to derive any benefit, gain or advantage from the deposit with such bank, corpora-
tion or individual, or association, of any money or valuable security held by him,
or which may be in his possession or under his control by virtue of his said office,
he shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and, on conviction, be sentenced to pay a fine
not exceeding one thousand dollars, and to undergo an imprisonment not exceeding
one year; and if still in office, be adjudged thereafter incapable of exercising the
same, and the said office shall be forthwith declared vacant by the court passing
sentence.
Sror. 65. If any state, county, township or municipal officer of this common-
wealth, charged with the collection, safe-keeping, transfer or disbursement of public
money, shall convert to his own use, in any way whatsoever, or shall use by way of
investment in any kind of property or merchandise, any portion of the public money
intrusted to him for collection, safe-keeping, transfer or disbursement, or shall prove
a defaulter, or fail to pay over the same when thereunto legally required by the
state, county or township treasurer, or other proper officer or person authorized to
demand and receive the same—every such act shall be deemed and adjudged to be
an embezzlement of so much of said money as shall be thus taken, converted,
invested, used or unaccounted for, which is hereby declared a misdemeanor; and
every such officer, and every person or persons whomsoever aiding or abetting, or
being in any way accessory to said act, and being thereof convicted, shall be
sentenced to an imprisonment, by separate or solitary confinement, at labor, not
exceeding five years, and to pay a fine equal to the amount of the money embezzled?
Szcr. 66. It shall not be lawful for any councilman, burgess, trustee, manager
or director of any corporation, municipality or public institution, to be at the same
time a treasurer, secretary or other officer, subordinate to the president and directors,
who shall receive a salary therefrom, or be the surety of such officer, nor shall any
member of any corporation or public institution, or any officer or agent thereof, be
in anywise interested in any contract for the sale or furnishing of any supplies,
or materials to be furnished to, or for the use of any corporation, municipality or
public institution of which he shall be a member or officer, or for which he shall
be an agent, nor directly nor indirectly interested therein, nor receive any reward
or gratuity from any person interested in such contract or sale; and any person
violating these provisions, or either of them, shall forfeit his membership in such
corporation, municipality or institution, and his office or appointment thereunder,
and shall be held guilty of a misdemeanor, and, on conviction thereof, be sentenced
to pay a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars:* Provided, That nothing in this
1 See 29 Leg. Int. 52. 8g _N. ‘
2 Purd. 500. igs oe 2 W. N.C. 557. 4 Ibid. 69. 70 Penn.
OFFICERS, PUBLIC, 753
section contained, shall prevent a vice-president of any bank from being a director
of such bank, or of receiving a salary as vice-president.
Sxcr. 67. Any person who shall contract for the sale, or sell, any supplies or
materials as aforesaid, and shall cause to be interested in any such contract or sale,
any member, officer, or agent of any corporation, municipality or institution, or give
or offer to give any such person any reward or gratuity, to influence him or them
in the discharge of their official duties, shall not be capable of recovering anything
upon any contract or sale, in relation to which he may have so practised or attempted
to practise corruptly, but the same shall be void; and such party shall be guilty of
a misdemeanor, and, on conviction thereof, be sentenced to pay afine not exceeding
five hundred dollars.
Sxot. 68. If any officer of any municipal or other corporation, not authorized
by law, shall be instrumental in, or shall consent to or connive at, the making or
issuing of any note, bill, check, ticket or order, intended to be used as currency,
he shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and, on conviction thereof, be sentenced to
pay a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars for each offence, and to undergo an
imprisonment nut exceeding six months.
IL. Officers required by law to exercise their judgments are not answerable for
mistakes of law, or mere errors of judgment, without any fraud or malice.?
If any officer (such as a sheriff or constable) having authority to attach the goods
of a person (say, by process or under an execution), keep them in any unsafe place, or
expose them to destruction, he is liable for the damage sustained.*
The oppression of officers in executing process is indictable.* Any officer, civil or
military, may increase the rigor of the confinement of a prisoner, if necessary to pre-
vent his escape.®
Where a court has jurisdiction of the action, their officers are not responsible for
errors in the process.®
It is a well-settled principle, that the acts of public officers de facto [in fact] are
valid, when they concern the public or the rights of third persons, who have an
interest in the acts, though they may be void when for their own benefit.’
Where a public officer seeks to enforce a legal right by action, he must be able to
show that he has duly qualified himself to act; but where a stranger seeks to recover
from a public officer as such, it is only necessary for him to show that he was an officer
de facto. “
Public officers allowing papers or records to be taken from their offices, without
process or order of the court, are responsible, with their sureties, for the loss or mutila-
tion of such documents.?
Every public officer can appoint a deputy to perform a mere ministerial act.’
A public officer charged with the appointment of persons to public office, may dis-
cuss the character of an applicant, without subjecting himself to a suit for slander, if
the comments did not originate in malice, and were upon the character and fitness of
the applicant for the office.”
A board of public officers having held a meeting, in pursuance of notice duly given,
stating the purpose for which it was to be held, may transact such business at an
adjourned meeting held for completing the business unfinished at the first meeting,
without further notice; the original notice in such case, extends to all adjourned
meetings.”
1 Purd. 532. 72 R.139. 1 Brewst. 67.
243 Penn. St.221. 11 Johns, 114, 1 South. 74. 85 W. 538. Bright. 426.
39 Johns. 381. 1 Y. 506. 99 W. 311.
45 Johns. 125. 10 6 Exch. 150.
514 Ibid. 235, 111 Phila, 269. 5 Clark 151. And see 17 W.
63 Binn. 404, 39S. & R.139. 23 Penn. St. N.C. 129.
189. 71 Ibid. 230. 96 Ibid. 31. 1223Q. 3B. 706. 3H. L. Cas. 418.
48.
[ 754 ]
Opium FHoints.
Act 10 JunE 1885. Purd. 526.
Sect. 1. If any person shall set up or establish, or cause to be set up or estab-
lished in any house, room, out-house, tent, booth, arbor or other place whatsoever,
any apparatus or device, or instrument whereby opium may be smoked or used in any
manner whatsoever by other persons, or if any person shall procure, permit, suffer or
allow persons to collect and assemble in his house, room, out-house, booth, tent, arbor,
or other place whatsoever under his control, for the purpose of smoking opium, or of
using opium in any manner, or if the owner, tenant, lessee or occupant of any house,
room, out-house, tent, booth, arbor or other place whatsoever, shall lease, hire or rent
the same or any part thereof, to be used and occupied or employed for the purpose
of smoking opium or of using opium in any way or manner by other persons, the
persons so offending in either of the enumerated cases, shall be guilty of a misde-
meanor, and'on conviction, be sentenced to pay a fine, not exceeding five hundred
dollars, and undergo an imprisonment, not exceeding one year.
The owner of such house, room, out-house, tent, booth, arbor or other place what-
soever, who shall have received information that any such smoking or use as afore-
said, is in or upon the said premises, and shall not within ten days thereafter, cause
complaint to be made against the person who has set up or established the same,
shall be deemed and held to have knowingly leased, hired or rented the premises for
the said unlawful purposes.
If any person shall keep or exhibit any apparatus, device or instrument for the
smoking of opium, or of using opium in any way or manner, by other persons, or aid
or assist or permit others to do the same, such persons shall be deemed guilty of a
misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof, be sentenced to an imprisonment, not ex-
ceeding one year, and to a fine, not exceeding five hundred dollars.
If any person shall be found in any house, room, out-house, tent, arbor or other
place whatsoever, set up or established as aforesaid, smoking opium or using opium
in any way or manner, or in any way or manner aiding, assisting, abetting or permit-
ting the smoking of opium or the use of opium, in the way or manner as aforesaid,
such person so offending, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction
thereof, be sentenced to an imprisonment, not exceeding one year, and to a fine, not
exceeding five hundred dollars.
If any person shall, through solicitation, invitation or device, persuade or prevail on
any person to visit any room, building, arbor, booth, shed or tenement, or other place
kept for the purpose of the smoking of opium, or of using opium in any way or
manner, such person shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction,
be sentenced to pay a fine, not exceeding five hundred dollars, and undergo an im-
prisonment, not exceeding one year.
If an affidavit be made and filed before any magistrate, before whom complaint has
been made of the commission of either of the crimes provided against in the preceding
sections, setting forth that the affiaut has reason to believe, and does believe, that the
person charged in such complaint has, upon his person or at any other place named in
said affidavit, any opium device, apparatus or instrument, the discovery of which
might lead to establish the truth of such charge, the said magistrate shall, by his war-
rant, command the officer who is authorized to arrest the person so charged, to make
diligent search for such opium device, apparatus or instrument, and if found, to bring
OPIUM JOINTS. 755
the same before such magistrate, and the officer so seizing shall deliver the same to
the magistrate before whom he takes the prisoner, who shall retain possession and be
responsible therefor, until the discharge, commitment or letting to bail of the person
so charged, after which such officer shall retain such opium device, apparatus or in-
strument, subject to the order of the court before which such offender may be required
to appear, until his discharge or conviction, and in case of the conviction of such
person, the opium device, apparatus or instrument shall, by the direction of the court,
be destroyed.
It shall and may be lawful for any sheriff, constable or other officer of justice, to
seize upon, secure and remove any opium device, apparatus or instrument of any
kind, character or description whatsoever used and employed for the purposes of the
unlawful smoking of opium, or of the unlawful use of opium as aforesaid, and to
arrest, with or without warrant, any person using or employing the same, and the
said court, upon hearing the parties if they should appear, if satisfied that such opium
device, apparatus or instrument was employed and used for the purpose of the un-
lawful smoking of opium, or of the unlawful use of opium as aforesaid, shall adjudge
the same forefeited, and order it to be publicly destroyed, and at the same time order
reasonable costs and charges to the seizing officer, to be paid by the owner or possessor
of such opium device, apparatus or instrument, or in case of his default, or in case he ,
cannot be found, to be paid as costs are now by law paid on indictment, and such ad-
judication shall be exclusive evidence to establish the legality of such seizure in any
court of this commonwealth.
In any case in which the question of its legality shall arise, no writ of replevin shall
issue for any opium device, apparatus or instrument seized as aforesaid, nor shall any
action be instituted for, or on account of, such seizure, until the court shall have first
adjudicated upon the premises, but such writ or action shall forthwith, on motion, be
quashed and abated by the court in which it shall be sued or brought: Provided,
That this act shall not apply to druggists or physicians, or others engaged in the
legitimate use or sale of opium.
[ 756 J
Original Entries,
Some Instructions relative to.
Derviatine from the strictness of that rule of the common Jaw which excludes
the testimony of a party, the courts of Pennsylvania have always received in evi-
dence, the day-book of the plaintiff, if it has been regularly kept, supported by his
own oath or affirmation, or that of his clerk or other agent, by whom the entry was
made, as prima facie [on the face of it] evidence of the sale and delivery of goods,
and of work and labor done and services rendered. They however refuse to receive
it as evidence of money paid or money lent. It is therefore a matter of some
importance to all who keep such books, that they have them so kept as to be received
and not rejected, when offered as evidence. Whether such books, when offered,
shall be received or not, is a legal question entirely for the court, or justice, as the
case may be, to determine,
For these reasons, it is the interest of every person who keeps such books to be
acquainted with the manner of keeping them, so as to insure their admissibility as
evidence. To impress these facts upon the memory of those who are interested in
knowing them, we propose to give particular and minute instructions how such
books should be kept, It is thought better to be particular and minute, even to
tediousness, than to be inaccurate or obscure.
Every storekeeper should provide himself with a day-book of the size which he
thinks his business will require. On the covers of this book, inside or outside, it
would be well to have written or printed the name of the person or the firm to whom
the book may belong.
It should be kept as free as possible from blots; more especially, do not permit
erasures, interlineations, alterations or defacements of any kind. If you discover
any error, mistake or omission in an original entry, which requires correction or
addition, do not erase, deface or any wise alter the original entry; so soon, how-
ever, as you discover the necessity of correcting it, let it be done by making an
entire new entry, under date of the time at which it shall be made, and as near
the original entry as the regular entries in your book will allow. By this course of
conduct, you bar out interlineations and erasures, things which disfigure and vitiate
original entries, and are offensive to the eye of the law, if it can, by any persuasion,
be prevailed upon to look at them. Above all things, let there be nothing in the
appearance of the book to give rise to suspicion of an intention to deceive or impose
upon the buyer, by anything in the nature of fraud or overcharge. .The dates
should follow regularly, day after day ; there should be no vacant spaces; a book
in which the entries have been made regularly, one after another, always carries
with it the appearance of fair dealing
The name or names of the persons to whom the goods are sold and delivered
should be distinctly written, and the dates, year, month and day, at the head of
every purchase; then should follow the articles sold and the quantity of each,
together with the price per piece, per yard, per lb. or per gross. The whole amount
of the sale should be carried out in dollars and cents on the right hand of the page,
on which the entry is made, in perpendicular columns, which shall have been
ruled for the purpose. In making these entries, it would be well to avoid using ink
of different shades; entries made with inks of different shades, although all under
one date, do not seem to the eye to have been made at one time, and the idea that
ORIGINAL ENTRIES. 757
they were made at different times might insinuate itself, and give birth to a suspi-
cion of unfairness ; this suspicion’ would be greatly strengthened, if the writing
should appear to have been made by different persons, or if the prices, or figures,
or amount carried out, should be made with ink of different shades, or by a different
hand, or at different times from the general entry of goods sold and delivered. In
the same way, and for pretty much the same reasons, interlineations or erasures
should not be made. The business of each day should be carefully registered on the
same day on which it is transacted, or, at farthest, on the succeeding day; if
longer delayed, they would not be admitted as legal evidence, unless under very
peculiar circumstances.
When a purchaser at a store ascertains the prices, selects the articles he wants,
and has them laid aside to be sent for by him, or to be forwarded to him by the
storekeeper, then is the time to make the charge against the purchaser, inasmuch as
the requirements of the law, as to sale and delivery, are then fully complied with ;
or the entries may be made, after the goods have been actually delivered to the
servant or other agent of the purchaser, or left at his dwelling-house.
When goods are sold to be forwarded to a distant place, the proper ééme to make
the entry is when they are loaded and started for the place to which they were, by
the purchaser, directed to be sent. If the purchaser direct the goods to be forwarded
by a particular carrier, or a particular line, or by a given route, the seller should not
only send the goods by that carrier, line and route, but also be able to prove that
they were so sent; to enable him to do this, he should take receipts in a book to
be kept for that purpose, for the packages of goods so forwarded, and thus have it
in his power to establish the facts, if required. Letters received from purchasers
acknowledging the receipt of goods, should be carefully filed away. It is the part
of prudence always to be prepared ; the seller cannot tell the time or the occasion, or
the persons against whom such proof may be wanted.
Scraps of paper, alleged to contain original entries of goods sold and delivered,
although regularly kept, will not be received as evidence. In the same way, entries
made in a book from scraps of paper, carried in the pocket for one or more days,
have been held, by the court, to be inadmissible.
An entry of the sale of goods, at the time. they were ordered, but before they
were delivered, is not competent evidence of a sale and delivery. Let it always
be borne in mind, that the goods must not only be sold, but also be delivered,
before a legal entry of sale and delivery can be made. It should be remembered,
that a book of original entries is not evidence of the delivery of goods to be sold on
commission—or of goods sold and delivered under a special contract.
‘If the person charged on the book be not the original debtor, but one who assumed
to pay the debt, or guarantied the debt of another, the creditor will not be allowed to
prove the sale and delivery of the goods by an entry in his books.
For work and labor done. The law as laid down in the preceding instructions
relative to original entries of the sale and delivery of goods, will, it is believed,
apply with equal truth and force to sustain a claim for work and labor done, or
services rendered, provided the person by whom the work was done, or his agent,
‘shall have kept it in the same strict and regular way in which it would require to
be kept to make it evidence of the sale and delivery of goods.
A person who works for another should always be able to prove that that other
had employed him; it would avail him nothing to work and to prove the work
he had done, if he were unable to prove that a certain person or persons had employed
him to do it. If the laborer can prove by whom he was employed to do the work,
even though no bargain or agreement were made as to compensation, yet he shall
recover a compensation for his labor. If A. shall prove that B. employed him to
do a certain job of work, the law will presume that B. was to pay him, and A., if
compelled to bring suit, shall have judgment in his favor for the amount usually
paid, where the work was done, for the same kind and quantity of work.
A person for whom work has been done, cannot, if sued, give in evidence an
account kept by him, of the plaintiff’s work and labor, but an account kept by the
person who did the work will be received as evidence. The law is indulgent and
does not require from a laboring man ‘that exactness or fulness of account which
it requires from dealers who are presumed to be more qualified- and better able to
758 , ORIGINAL ENTRIES.
keep accounts than men who earn their daily bread by the sweat of their brow. If
a laborer who cannot write shall make a nick (with a knife) in a stick, or a mark
with ink, or a pencil, or chalk, on paper, a board, or any other substance, and take
eare to do it every night, after his work is done, so that he can produce the sub-
stance so marked, and be duly qualified that he made these marks every day he
worked for the individual whom he sues, such substance so marked and proved
shall be received as evidence of the debt. . f
Every mechanic or other person, who-undertakes to do a job of work, is bound
to do it in a workmanlike manner, and if he does not so do it, the person by whom
he was employed may recover damages. A mechanic having executed the work he
undertook to execute in a workmanlike manner, if there be no special agreement or
custom of trade, is entitled to be promptly paid, and if the employer neglects
or refuses to pay him, he may keep the article he had made or repaired, until he
shall be paid for the work and labor he has bestowed on it. Butif he delivers the
article to the employer, he has no right to go and take it away, as security for
the payment of the work done; if he does so, he may be sued as a trespasser; he
has no right to keep a job as security for the payment of any other work for which
the same employer may be indebted to him.
The day-laborer’s account book. A paragraph to make plain and clear the whole
art and mystery of keeping an account between a day-laborer and his employer may
be useful, particularly to that class of men who stand most in need of all the helps
which can be given them.
Buy two cents worth of writing-paper, fold it in the form of a book; with two
more cents buy a pen and a little ink. A pen and ink is better than a pencil, not
only because it speaks plainer, but it more clearly shows any interlineation or alter-
ation. Let the employer write at the beginning of the book something to the
following effect :
“This day, January lst, 1845, I agree with Jacob Faithful to work for me for
six months; he is to find his own board and lodging, and I am to pay him one
dollar a day.”
The book should now be handed back to Jacob, to keep his time, which should
be done thus: He should every night make a straight stroke, thus | , to signify
or bear witness that he bad worked the whole day, for his employer; this must
be done every night, on the same day after the work has been done. Half days
may be distinguished by a short mark, thus! , and quarter days by a point, thus -.
The making of these marks must not be postponed, neglected or put off, to the
next or to any future day or evening; it must be done on the evening of the day
on which the work was done. It would be well to have a regular time to make
those marks ; let it be just before or just after supper, and there will be no fear
of forgetting it.
Since the foregoing article was written, the act making parties competent
witnesses in their own behalf has rendered the instructions here given of less
importance, than before the passage of that statute: but it is to be remembered
that where the opposite party is deceased, the creditor cannot be permitted to
establish his claim by his own oath, in a suit against the personal representative.
Every man ought, therefore, to make his book-entries in legal form, in antici-
pation of such a possible contingency.
1 8 Met. 269.
[ 759 ]
Parent and Child,
I. When mothers to exercise parental rights. II. Judicial decisions and authorities,
I. Aor 4 May 1855. Purd. 1301.
Szor. 3. Whensoever any husband or father, from drunkenness, profligacy or
other cause, shall neglect or refuse to provide for his child or children, the mother
of such children shall have all the rights and be entitled to claim, and be subject to
all the duties reciprocally due between a father and his children, and she may place
them at employment and receive their earnings, or bind them to apprenticeship,
without the interference of such husband, the same as the father can now do by
law: Provided always, That she shall afford to them a good example, and properly
educate and maintain them according to her ability: And provided, That if the
mother be of unsuitable character to be intrusted as aforesaid, or dead, the proper
court may appoint a guardian of such children, who shall perform the duties afore-
said, and apply the earnings of such children for their maintenance and education.
Szor. 6. No father who shall have as aforesaid, for one year or upwards previous
to his death, wilfully neglected or refused to provide for his child or children, shall
have the right to appoint any testamentary guardian of him, her or them, during
minority.?
Il. The duties of parents to their children, as being their natural guardians, con-
sist in maintaining and educating them during the season of infancy and youth, and
in making reasonable provision for their future usefulness and happiness in life, by a
situation suited to their habits, and a competent provision for the exigencies of that
situation.” ;
During the minority of the child, the parent is absolutely bound to provide reason-
ably for his maintenance and education, and he may be sued for necessaries furnished,
and schooling given to a child, under just and reasonable circumstances.’ But if will-
ing and able to support his child, he cannot be made liable for its maintenance to one
who has wrongfully withheld it from him.‘
The father is bound to support his minor children, if he be of ability, even though
they have property of their own; but this obligation, in such a case, does not extend
to the mother.’ This is the rule as to private parties, but as to the public, the obliga-
tion of the surviving mother, if of sufficient ability, to maintain her children, is co-
extensive with that of the father. The legal obligation of the father to maintain his
child ceases, as soon as the child is of age, however wealthy the father may be, unless
the child become chargeable to the public as a pauper.”
A father is not bound by the contract of his son, even for articles suitable and
necessary, unless an actual authority be proved, or the circumstances be sufficient to
imply one; were it otherwise, a father who had an imprudent son might be preju-
diced to an indefinite extent. What is necessary for the child is left to the discretion
of the parent, and where the infant is sub potestate parentis [under the protection of
the parent], there must be a clear omission of duty as to necessaries, before a third
person can interfere, and furnish them, and charge the father.®
The rights of parents result from their duties. As they are bound to maintain
and educate their children, the law has given them a right to such authority, and
in the support of that authority, a right to the exercise of such discipline as may be
requisite for the discharge of their sacred trust.? The father may bind out his minor
child and appropriate his wages; but he is not bound to do so for the benefit of
creditors.® : a
It has been decided, that a parent is intrusted with the religious, moral and
1 Purd. 1303. 6 62 Penn. St. 472.
22 Kent’s Com. 159. 12 Kent’e Com. 161,
33 Day 37. 13 Johns. 180. 8 Thid. 162.
433 Penn. St. 50. 9Tbid. 169. 5 Clark 78
52 Mass. 415. 4 Ibid. 97. 10 27 Penn. St. 220. See 1 Wood. 135.
760 PARENT AND CHILD.
literary education of his children—this duty gives him the right to select proper
teachers—and therefore a minister of the gospel has no right to administer baptism
by immersion, against the express prohibition of the father, to a female of about
seventeen years of age, who was already baptized according to the usage of the
denomination to which she belonged.t. But it is also ruled, that a father has no
right to control or interfere with the rights of conscience of his minor child, who
has arrived at the age of discretion, in relation to the worship of Almighty God.
The duties that are enjoined upon children to their parents, are obedience and
assistance during their own minority, and gratitude and reverence during the rest
of their lives.’
In general, a father is entitled to the custody of his children; but where both
the father and mother are persons of immoral character, the court may order a female
child to be delivered to a third person.t Where the father is a vagabond, and appa-
rently unable to provide for the safety and wants of the child, the court will not
interfere in his favor, to take the child from any safe custody to deliver it to him’
A mother, as such, has no legal authority over a son, and is not entitled to his
services while he lives with her.®
The relation between parent and child is so far relaxed, that a father may authorize
his son to contract with an employer, and receive his wages for his own use.? Where
a son continues with his father, after he has arrived at full age, and is supported by
him, without any contract to be paid for his services, but with a view to a provision
by will, he cannot, after the death of his father, support a claim against his estate,
for compensation for his services ;* the law implies no contract, in such case, between
the parent and the child.®
A request by a father to a physician to attend his son, then of full age and sick
at his father’s house, raises no implied promise on the part of the father to pay for
the services rendered by the physician.”
When actual force is used upon the person of a child, trespass per guod servitium
amisit [by which the service of the child has been lost] lies by the father." If an
injury be inflicted upon a child, while living with and in the service of his father,
he may maintain trespass ; but if at the time he be hired to, and in the service of
another, trespass on the case is the proper remedy.”
The law raises no implied promise to pay, from the mere fact of a mother’s main-
tenance of her child; the presumption is, that it was furnished gratuitously.”
A guardian stands, in relation to his ward, in the place of the parent, and may
maintain an action on the case and recover damages for her seduction.’
A step-father is not entitled by law to the custody or services of the children of
his wife by a former husband, nor is he bound to maintain them.%
A parent may relinquish his right to the services of his minor child, so that
he cannot re-assert that right as against the child or third persons;!® and he
may do so, by parol.” The emancipation of the son from the control of the parent, may
be as perfect, while living under the same roof, as if they were separated.
1 1 Clark 146. Lewis’ Cr. L. 20. 10 4 W. 247,
2 2 Ibid. 36. 2 Leg. Gaz. 98. ll 7 Ibid. 62.
5 2 Kent’s Com. 172. 5 Clark 30. 12 8 Ibid. 227.
4 1 Bro. 143. 18 Thid. 366.
5 16 Pick. 203. 1 3W. &S. 416.
6 4 Binn. 492-4, But see act of 1855, supra. 16 3N. Y. 312. 4 Ibid. 38. See 2 Wood. 181.
72 W. 406. 15 Penn. St. 220. 16 5 Clark 30.
§3R. 243. 5 W.& 8.513. 14 Penn. St. 201. 1 2 Leg. Gaz. 179.
9 29 Penn. St. 469,465. 30 Ibid. 473. 18 15 Penn. St. 220,
[ 761 J
Partnership.
[See Jornt-Stook Companiss.]
I. Formation of partnership. other.
II. What constitutes a partnership. VI. Dissolution of a partnership.
III. The different kinds of partners. VII. Of actions between partners.
IV. Of dormant partners. : VIII. Of actions by and against partners,
V. How far the acts of one partner bind the IX. Limited partnership.
I. FoRMATION OF PARTNERSHIP.
PARTNERSHIP is a voluntary contract between two or more persons for joining
together their money, goods, labor and skill, or any or all of them, under an under-
standing that there shall be a communion of profit between them, and for the
purpose of carrying on a legal trade, business or adventure.
The formation of a contract of partnership does not require any particular
formality. It is, in general, sufficient, that it be formed by the voluntary consent
of the parties, whether that be express or implied, whether it be by written articles,
tacit approbation, or by parol contract, or even by mere acts.? It seems, however,
(though there are authorities to the contrary), that an agreement to form a partner-
ship for the purpose of buying and selling land is within the statute of frauds, and
must be in writing.’
Our act of 1851 provides, that where two or more persons may be desirous of
entering into any business whatever, in a partnership capacity, they shall, before
they engage or enter into such business, file in the office of the prothonotary of the
county where such partnership is to be carried on, the names and location of the mem-
bers of such partnership, with the name and style of the same; and that as often as
any change of members in said partnership shall take place, the same shall be cer-
tified by the members of such new partnership as aforesaid; and in default or
neglect of such partnership so to do, they shall not be permitted in any suits
or actions against them in any court, or before any justice of the peace or alderman
in this commonwealth, to plead any misnomer or the omission of the name of any
member of the partnership, or the inclusion of the names of persons not members
of said partnership.*
II. WHAT CONSTITUTES A PARTNERSHIP. i
Persons become liable as partners to third persons, either by contracting the legal
relation of partners between themselves, or by holding themselves out to the world
as partners; for, by the law, not only he who is actually a partner, but he who lends
his name and credit to the firm, is liable for the debts and engagements of the
body; no restriction of liability is permitted to any of the partners ; all are liable
not only to the extent of their interest in the joint stock, but also to the whole
extent of their separate property.°
The members of an association, if not incorporated, are considered as partners in
their relations to third persons ; and the property of the association must be appro-
priated to pay the debts of creditors, not members of the association, before it can
be applied to the payment of the claims of those who are members® If several
persons dine together at a tavern, each is liable for the whole dinner.’
Although men may be liable as partners, in a question between them and third
persons, notwithstanding an agreement between themselves to the contrary; yet, as
between themselves, the agreement will govern.® Any limitations contained in
articles of copartuership cannot affect third persons, to whom they are unknown.?
“Tt is clearly settled, that if a man stipulates that, as the reward of his labor, he
1 Collyer on Part. 2. may be set up by way of replication. 3 Phila
2 Story Part. 3 86. 3 Kent Com. 27. 148; contra, 1 W. N. ©. 5.
3 3 Sumn. 435. 2 Ware 320. 2 Dex Ge & J. 5 Collyer on Part. 3.
52. Story Part. 3 8 6 5 R.157. 1 Pars. 111-12.
3.
# Act 14 fern 3 13-14, Purd. 1646. A T Collyer 25 n. 6 W. & S. 69
ples of non-joinder, in abatement, need not aver 8 6S. & R. 333,
-@ compliance with the act; an omission thereof 9 1 Dall. 269.
762 ' PARTNERSHIP.
shall have, not a specific interest in the business, but a given sum of money even in
proportion to a given guantum of the profits, that will not make him a partner ; but
if he agrees for a part of the profits, as such, giving him a right to an account,
though having no property in the capital, he is, as to third persons, a partner.””? A
contract to pay a manager, by way of salary, such a sum of money as shall be equal
to a certain per-centage on the net profits of the undertaking, does not make hima
partner.’ :
Our statute of 1870 provides, that it shall be lawful for any person or persons to
loan money to any individual, firm, association or corporation, doing business in
this commonwealth, upon agreement to receive a share’of the profits of such busi-
ness, as compensation for the use of the money so loaned, in lieu of interest; and
such agreement, or the reception of profits under such agreement, shall not render
the person or persons making such loans liable as a copartner in such business, to
other creditors of such individual firm, association or corporation, except as to the
money so loaned: Provided, That such agreement for loan shall be in writing ; and
that this act shall not apply to any loan made by a member of any such firm, asso-
ciation or dorporation, or to one who holds himself out as such, and shall not be
construed to repeal or affect any portion of the law relating to special partnerships :
Provided, however, That any person so loaning money under this act shall not hold
himself out as a general partner, so as to induce credit to be given to any party or
parties, association or corporation, to whom the said loan shall be made.’
And by the act of 1871, individuals and corporations employing labor may give
to employees, in addition to regular wages, or in lieu thereof, a conditional interest
in the profits of the business, to be regulated and determined by agreement between
the parties ; and the employee receiving such conditional share of profits shall not
by reason thereof be deemed liable for the debts or losses of the business, or have
any voice in the management, except in so far as may be clearly defined in the con-
stitution or agreement under which the association is organized, or operations
conducted.*
The act further provides, that any manufacturing, mining or improvement com-
pany, firm or partnership, doing business under the laws of this commonwealth, may,
without change of name, accept the provisions of this act and organize its business
in accordance therewith, first giving notice to the auditor (general) of its intention
so to do, and filing with him a statement of the capital to be employed and in what
it consists, and a copy of the articles of agreement or constitution and by-laws by
which the operations of the company or association are to be governed. But that
no company shall be entitled to the benefits of the act, which shall not, in its agree-
ment or articles af association, filed with the auditor-general, provide for the distri-
bution of at least one-half of the net profits of its business to its employees, after
paying a dividend of not more than ten per centum per annum upon its stock.6
III. THE DIFFERENT KINDS OF PARTNERS.
An ostensible partner is he whose name appears to the world as that of a
partner.
A nominal partner is an ostensible partner having no interest in the firm.
A dormant partner is he whose name and transactions as a partner are professedly
concealed from the world.
A general partner is one who is responsible, without limit, for the contracts and
engagements of the firm.
A special partner is one who is not liable for the debts of the firm beyond the
amount of capital contributed by him.
IV. OF DORMANT PARTNERS.
A dormant partner may withdraw, without giving public notice; for being unknown
as a partner, notice of his withdrawal would be useless.*
1 Gow on Part. 22-3. 15 8S. & R.137. 6 W. * Act 15 June 1871 31.
& 8.139. 1 Penn. St. 255. 5 Ibid. 3 2. Gh Purl: Tee,
23 Mac. & G. 250. 24 How. 536. 6 Tbid. 3 3.
8 Act 6 April 1870 3 1. Purd. 1648, See 83 7128. & R. 315. 6 Johns, 144,
Penn. St. 286.
PARTNERSHIP. 763
It is said, a dormant partner should not be included ag plaintiff, though he may
be as defendant.?
The liability of a dormant partner to creditors may be avoided by proof of fraud
in the formation of the partnership, if no part of the funds have been received by
such dormant partner.?
If A. contract with B. to deliver articles to him at a specified period, and in the
intermediate time, B, enters into a partnership with C., if credit be given at the time
of delivery, it is presumed to be given to the partners, and they are liable, whether
the fact of the partnership was or was not known to A. at the time he gave the
credit.’
A dormant partner is not responsible for the debt of the firm contracted after he
has ceased to be a partner, but before public notice is given of a dissolution of the
partnership.‘
A dormant partner it liable for the contracts of the firm during the time he is
actually a partner;> but he may retire without notice, and thenceforth is no longer
liable for the debts which the firm may contract.®
V. How FAR THE ACTS OF ONE PARTNER BIND THE OTHER.”
In actions against partners, the declarations of any of them respecting the part-
nership may be given in evidence to establish it as against himself.* Declarations
by one defendant of the existence of a partnership between himself and the other
defendant, although not sufficient to charge the latter as a partner, are evidence of
the fact as against himself, and may be admitted in evidence in connection with
proof of the acts and declarations of the other defeudant, that he was a partner.®
Partners are bound universally by what'is done by each other in the course of
the partnership business ; their liability under contracts is commensurate with their
rights, and the act of one is the act of all.° The act of one partner is the act of both;
there is a virtual authority to that purpose, mutually given by entering into partner-
ship, and in everything in relation to their usual dealings each must be considered
as the attorney of the other. Each partner is liable as a principal, not as a surety,
for the transactions of the other, and it is no ground of discrimination which part-
ner actually received the funds which were intrusted to transact the business, or
which was ignorant of the state of the debt and credit of the company’s books.”
A partner, whilst employed in transacting partnership business, may borrow
money for the purpose of defraying his expenses, and it will be a charge upon the
whole firm.
The signature of one partner as the maker of a joint promissory note, or the
drawer of a bill of exchange, is binding upon his co-partner, and equally binding is
his acceptance of a billof exchange; for the bill being drawn upon them jointly, the
acceptance of a single partner, in the names of both (or even in his own name), is
in legal effect a joint acceptance. So, prima facie the indorsement of a bill or note
by one partner in the name of the partnership binds all the firm.
A note made by one partner, wherein he says, “I promise to pay,” &c., but sub-
scribes the partnership name, is binding on the firm.’® Even if a bill be accepted in
the name of one partner only, and not in that of the firm, yet if the bill be addressed
to the firm, all the members of it, whether dormant or not, will be bound by such
acceptance.!6 .
If a member of a club orders goods for the benefit of all, every member who con-
curs in the order, or afterwards approves of it, is liable, unless it appears that the
creditor, at the time of sale, gave credit to that member only.”
18S. 4&R. 255. 4 W. 456. 36 Penn. St. 293. 93W.101. 8 W.&S. 257. See 4 Whart. 365
21 Whart. 381. 2 Ibid. 542. 13 Penn. St. 641.
33 W. 101. 1012S. & R. 248. 36 Penn. St. 498.
41258. & R. 315. 1 1 Dall. 119.
5 22 Penn. St. 68. 12 4 Thid. 286.
6 36 Ibid. 325. 18 Gow on Part. 58. See 1 Am. L. Cas. 453.
7 See the authorities on this subject, collected 14 5 Day 50.
in 128. & R. 248. And 1 Greenl. Evid. 3 112. 16 11 Johns. 544. 7 W. 193.
81W.& S. 334, 32 Penn. St. 312. 54 Ibid. 16 Collyer 224, 226,
203. 62 Ibid. 374. 6 Phila. 534. 17 2 Stark. 416.
764 PARTNERSHIP.
A sale of goods on credit to one partner, in the course of the partnership busi-
ness, is a sale to the firm, unless it be made contrary to an express notice by the
other partner not to trust the firm on his account ; in which case, he alone will be
liable who made the purchase, and an action to recover the price cannot be main-
tained against the firm.’ ; :
If one of two joint partners release to a debtor of the partnership, notwithstand-
ing he had no authority to release more than his own moiety of the debt, the action
is gone against the debtor.” a eee
If one partner convert property which came into the possession of the firm, on
partnership account, it is the conversion of all, and makes them all liable in
trover.$ .
One partner cannot bind another by giving a note in the partnership name for
his own private debt.‘ But, a note signed by one partner, or by the clerk in the
name of a firm, is prima facie evidence that it was given for the debt of the firm.’
If, however, a note be given by one partner, in the name of the firm, for his own
private debt, and the other partner, upon being informed of the transaction, do not
dissent or give notice to the payee, that he will not be liable, he shall be bound §
One partner cannot bind his copartner by deed, although it be given in a trans-
action in the course of the business of the firm, and the benefit of the contract be
received by the firm ;’ but a deed sealed by one partner in the partnership name
may be good, if the others assent ;° the subsequent assent of the other partner may
be shown by parol.? If one partner sign and seal an instrument in the firm’s name,
and the other partner be present assenting to it, he is as much bound by the instru-
ment as if he had signed and sealed it; any evidence which tends to establish
the fact of his having assented to it is admissible.’
One partner may transfer the whole stock in trade of the firm ; and if possession
be delivered, and the transaction be bond fide, it matters not whether the instru-
ment be under seal or otherwise."
On mature reflection, my opinion is, that one partner may fairly euter into an
agreement to refer, by writing under seal, any partnership matter, and this would
bind the whole firm. Ido not say, that one partner can bind the others, where
there is an express dissent communicated to the party litigant.”
Two partners holding a judgment, one of them assigned it to a third person, and
guarantied the payment thereof, in the partnership name: held, that an action
could not be supported against the firm on such guarantee, without proof that it was
in the course of their business to give such guarantees, or that both partners assented
to the making of it, or knowing it, did not dissent.2 The promise of one partner
that the firm will pay the debt of a third person is not binding on his copartners."*
A partner has no power to bind his copartner by a confession of judgment against
the firm; but if such a judgment be confessed, it will bind the partner who did it,
and be void as to the other ;* such judgment, however, will bind the firm property."
A judgment entered upon a warrant, sealed by a partner, in the name of his firm,
binds no one but himself; but a subsequent revival of it by the attorney of all the
partners cures the irregularity.”
A firm cannot be charged with a debt contracted by one of the partners, before
the partnership was constituted, although the subject-matter which was the con-
sideration of the debt has been carried into the partnership as stock ; nor can the
firm be charged with rent which accrued upon a lease to one of the partners."
One partner cannot, without the consent of the other, introduce a stranger into
the firm, nor can he, without such consent, make the other partner a member of
another firm; but such consent may be implied from the acquiescence and acts
15 W.&S. 564, Penn. St. 458.
2 4 Binn. 375. 11 5 W. 23. See 3 Am. L. J. 489.
8 4B. 120. 12-128. & R. 251, Duncan, J.
445. & R. 397. 16 Penn. St. 399. 132 P. & W. 177.
5 2P.& W. 160. 32 Penn. St. 115. M4 35 Penn. St. 517. 14 W. N.C. 352.
6 Thid. 2.W. & 8.152. Sco 16 Penn. St. 399. 1 1 W. & &. 340.
71P. & W. 285. See 62 Ponn. St. 393. 16 25 Penn. St. 430. See 36 Ibid. 458.
§84W.C.C. 471. 6 W. & S, 165. 171 W. & 8.519. 7 W. 331. See 101 Penn. St.
® 80 Penn. St. 84. 553.
106 W.159. 7 Ibid. 331. 1P. & W. 285, 26 18 5 W. 196.
PARTNERSHIP. 765
of the parties ; and if such other partner be made acquainted with the facts, he
ought to dissent from the arrangement ; otherwise, he will be bound by it.1
If a partner borrow money and give his individual note for it, it does not become
a partnership debt, by reason of the application of the money to partnership pur-
poses.?
A partnership is entitled to recover its assets, applied by one partner to the pay-
ment of his debt, whether or not he acted in bad faith towards his copartner, in
making such application ; and a recovery may be had, though such partner be a
plaintiff; and this, 2¢ seems, even at law.* ,
VI. DIssoLUTION OF A PARTNERSHIP.
It seems, that a partnership formed by articles for a definite period, may be dis-
solved by either partner, before the termination of the period.*
Simple insolvency does not work a dissolution of the partnership, nor divest the
partners of their dominion over the partnership property?
The death of a partner works a dissolution of the partnership so effectually, that
want of notice of it does not have the effect of making the estate of the deceased
partner liable to debts contracted by the surviving partners, or for their misconduct.
If, however, contracts have been made and engagements entered into which have
not been completed at the death of the partner, the partnership is to be considered
as existing for such purpose. If a contract be made with a firm to do a particular
work, which is begun in the lifetime of a deceased partner, though not finished till
after his death, his estate is liable, if the surviving partner be insolvent.®
Notice of the dissolution of a partnership, given in a newspaper printed in the
city or county where the partnership business is carried on, is of itself notice to all
persons who have had no previous dealings with the firm.’ But as to persons who
have had dealings with the firm, general newspaper notice is not sufficient; it must
be shown that actual notice of the dissolution was communicated to the party in
some way or other.®
The dissolution of a partnership cannot affect the rights of third persons.2 The
dissolution of a firm, and an arrangement between them, by which the debts were
to be paid by one of them, does not affect the liability of either to third persons who
knew of the arrangement.”
After a dissolution of partnership, one of the partners cannot bind the others by
using the name of the firm; but if, by the agreement and terms of the dissolution,
it be provided, that the firm name shall be used in winding up the business, and
for the renewal of any notes given in banks, then all the partners will be bound by
the use of it in a transaction connected with their business. ,
After the dissolution of a partnership, by agreement, the partner authorized to
settle the estate, may borrow money on the credit of the firm, to pay the debts of
the firm ; and if the credit be given in good faith, though with a knowledge of the
dissolution, and the money faithfully applied to the liquidation of the joint debts,
the creditor has a claim against the firm, and is not to be considered as a creditor
merely of the borrowing partner.”
After a dissolution of copartnership, one cannot confess a judgment against all
who were partners, without the express authority of those not signing the con-
fession, even although for a debt bond fide due by the late copartnership.¥ After
dissolution of a partnership, one of the firm has not power to make a voluntary
assigniment of the effects of the partnership for the benefit of creditors, against the
express consent of his copartner."*
‘After the dissolution of the partnership, one partner cannot, by his acknowledg-
ment of a subsisting debt, deprive the other partner of the benefit of the statute
of limitations. The admissions of a partner, after dissolution of the partnership,
- 1 Whart. 381. See 2 Ibid. 542, 1 Am. L. 9 4 Y. 337.
Reg. 34. 10 8 W. 485,
25 W. 454. 1 2W.& 8.172. See 3 Ibid. 345, 5 Ibid. 210.
8 6 Penn. St. 492. 12 5 Whart. 530. 4 Penn. St. 242. 14 Ibid. 469.
4 1 Whart. 381. But see 2 Pears. 137. 72 Ibid. 358. 92 Ibid. 112.
5 28 Penn. St. 279.’ 13 2 M. 436.
61.212. 11 Phila. 131. 143W.&S. 454,
7 4 Whart. 482. 117 8. & R.126. 1 P.& W.138. 48 Penn,
8 14 Penn. St. 469. 36 Ibid. 114. 38 Ibid. 214. St. 248. 71 Ibid. 208. 2N. Y¥. 523.
766 PARTNERSHIP.
bind no one but himself; unless he be the agent of the firm, in winding up its
concerns. .
After the dissolution of a partnership, either of the late partners has authority to
receive a debt due to the firm, and to discharge their debtor.” os ;
When one of two partners retires, relinquishing to the other all his interest in
the partnership property, the remaining partner has the same dominion over it, as if
it had always been his own property. But the purchaser of the interest of one of
several partners, has no right to interfere personally in the affairs of the partner-
ship; anda refusal of the remaining partners to permit him to do so will not
entitle him to the interference of a court of equity, by injunction, or the appoint-
ment of a receiver.‘
A surviving partner is not entitled to compensation for winding up the partner-
ship business.® .
The act of 1862 provides, that whenever any copartnership firm shall be dissolved
by mutual consent or otherwise, it shall and may be lawful for any one or more of the
individuals who was or were embraced in such copartnership firm, to make a separate
composition or compromise with any one or all of the creditors of such copartnership
firm; and such composition or compromise shall be a full and effectual discharge to
the debtor or debtors making the same, and to them only, of and from all and every
liability to the creditor or creditors with whom the same is made or incurred, by
reason of his or their connection with such copartnership firm, according to the
terms of such compromise.®
Every such debtor or debtors making such composition or compromise, may take
from the creditor or creditors with whom he may make the same, a note or memo-
randum in writing, exonerating him or them from all and every individual liability
incurred by reason of such connection with such copartnership firm, which note or
memorandum may be given in evidence by such debtor or debtors, in bar of such
creditor’s right of recovery against him or them; and if such liability shall be by
judgment in any court of record in this state, then on a production to and filing
with the clerk of such court, the said note or memorandum in writing, lawfully
acknowledged, such clerk shall discharge such judgment of record, so far as the said
compromising debtor or debtors shall be concerned.
_Such composition or compromise with an individual member of a firm, shall not
be so construed as to discharge the other copartners, nor shall it impair the right
of the creditor to proceed against the members of such copartnership firm as have
not been discharged ; and the member or members of such copartnership firm so
proceeded against, shall be permitted to set off any demand against said creditor or
creditors, which could have been set off had such suit been brought against all the
individuals composing such firm ; nor shall such compromise or discharge of an indi-
vidual of such firm prevent the other members from availing themselves of any
defence that would have been available had not this act passed, except that they
shall not set up the discharge of one individual as a discharge of the other copart-
ners, unless it shall appear that all were intended to be discharged: Provided, That
the discharge of any such copartner shall be deemed a payment to the creditor equal
to the proportionate interest of the partner discharged, in the partnership con-
cern, unless he shall have paid more than his proportioned interest, in which event
the full amount paid by such discharged debtor shall be credited®
Such compromise or composition of an individual (member) of a firm, with a cred-
itor of such firm, shall in nowise affect the right of the other copartners to call on the
individual making such compromise for his ratable proportion of such copartnership
debt, the same as if this law had not been passed.®
The above provisions in reference to copartners of a firm shall extend’ to juint-
debtors, who are hereby authorized, individually, to compound or compromise for
eheir joint indebtedness, with the like effect in reference to creditors and joint-
debtors of the individuals so compromising as is above provided in reference to
copartners.’°
1 34 Penn. St. 344. 6 Act 22 March 1862 21. Purd 1648,
2 32 Ibid. 412. But see 81 Leg. Int. 413; 7 7 Ibid. 3 2.
Leg. Gaz. 35. 8 Ibid. 2 3.
3 26 Penn. St. 108. 9 Ibid. 2 4.
4 6 Clark 203. 10 Thid. 2 6.
6 19 Penn. St. 516. 11 W. N.C. 512.
PARTNERSHIP. 767
VII. OF ACTIONS BETWEEN PARTNERS,
If two be jointly concerned in an adventure, and one acting fairly, and for the
best, according to his judgment, produce a loss, he is not answerable to the other.)
One partner cannot sustain assumpsit against another, after the partnership is
dissolved, unless the balance be struck, or a promise to pay be made, either expressly
or by keeping, for a considerable time, a stated account, sent to him by the other,
and not objecting. Qne partner cannot maintain asswmpsit against the executor or
administrator of the other, for the proceeds of a partnership adventure, unless they
have settled their accounts, and struck a balance. This balance must have been
struck by themselves by agreement; it is not sufficient that it may be deduced
from the partnership books.*
If an agreement of settlement between partners be set aside, in an action upon it,
the parties are thereby restored to their original rights and liabilities ; and an action
of account-render will afterwards lie by one against the other.®
Contribution may be obtained in an action of assumpsit, by one partner against
another, for money laid out to its use.®
One partner may maintain an action for money had and received against the
other partner, for money received to the separate use of the former, and wrongfully
carried to the partnership account.”
Where a surviving partner administers to the estate of his deceased copartner,
the balance due to the decedent, upon a statement of the partnership accounts, is
assets in his hands, as administrator; and the settlement of his administration
account uecessarily draws into investigation the partnership transactions, for the
purpose of ascertaining the amount so due to the decedent.®
One partner cannot maintain account-render against his two copartners jointly,
without showing a joint liability to account. Partners are liable to account to each
other severally, but not jointly; each of them is to account to every other for him-
self, and not for his copartner.®
The act of 1838 provides, that no action brought by partners or several persons,
against partners or several persons, shall abate, or the right of such partners or
several persons, plaintiffs, to sustain their action, be defeated, by reason of one
or More individuals being or having been members of both firms, or being or having
been of the parties plaintiffs and also of the parties defendants, in the same suit,
but the same shall proceed to trial and judgment as though the parties plaintiffs.
and defendants were separate and distinct persons, and the acts and declarations of
the partner or persons so being of both the parties plaintiffs and defendants, shall
be evidence to affect each party, respectively, in like manner and to the same extent
as the acts and declarations of the other partners or persons plaintiffs or defendants,
would affect the respective firms or parties: Provided, That no act or declaration of
the party shall be given in evidence in his own favor, to the prejudice of others.”
VIII. OF AcTIONS BY AND AGAINST PARTNERS.
Partners in actions instituted to enforce contracts made with them must all join ;
or if one or more of them be dead, the survivors must join. Ifa house, consisting
of several acting partners, carry on business in the name of one, he cannot, alone,
maintain an action for goods sold by the house, though the contract was made with
him only, nor can the names of the others be added, after the action is brought."
It is not requisite to the maintenance of an action commenced by the real mem-
bers of a fir, that its nominal members should be joined, if it appear that such
12 W. C. C. 224. ; a member of two district copartnerships; it does
21 Ibid. 435. 4 W. & S.14. 71 Penn. St.177. not authorize a partner to bring an action against
3 4 Dall. 434; 1 Binn. 191. 9S. & R. 241. 51 himself and his copartners. 5 W. & 8.468. 34
Penn. St. 258. Penn. St. 331. 2 Clark 11. 7 Phila. 179. 4
49S.&R. 241. 2 W. N.C. 506, Brewst.101. The judgment is a lien on the sepa-
5 1W.& §. 342. rate real estate of the partners, but their separate
® Cary on Part. 26. 6 W. & S. 235. estate cannot be seized in execution, until the
72 T. R199. accounts are taken, and the equities settled between
5 28 Pitts, L. J. 118. the parties. 6 W. & S. 465. Bright. 450. The
9 32 Penn. St. 202. 158. & BR. 153. act did not take away the previously existing
1 Aot 14 April 1838. Purd.1646, This act is remedy in equity. 9 Phila. 275.
restricted to oases in which the same individualis U85.& R. 53. But see Purd. 100.
\
768 PARTNERSHIP.
nominal members have not any interest in the concern ;’ and the proof that the
ostensible partner is not really a partner, lies on the plaintiff?
In the event of the death of one or more of the partners, to whom the cause of
action accrued, the legal remedy vests in the surviving partners, and not in them
jointly with the executors or administrators of the deceased partner.*
In an action brought against a partnership firm, on a partnership contract, all
those who were partners at the time of the contract ought to be joined as defend-
ants. If one of several partners die, the action must be brought against the sur-
vivors, and if the executor or administrator of the deceased partner be sued, he may
either plead the survivorship in bar, or give it in evidence under the general issue.°
Upon the death of the last surviving partner, an action on the partnership account
must be brought against his executors or administrators only, without joining the
executors or administrators of the other partners.®
An action for a partnership debt may be maintained in this state against the
executor (or administrator) of a deceased partner, the other partner being alive, but
a certificated bankrupt before action brought.’ After bankruptcy of a partner, he
cannot be joined as plaintiff with his copartner, but where such action is brought
into the common pleas, by appeal from a magistrate, the assignee may be sub-
stituted.®
The act of 1830 provides, that in all suits, brought in any court of record, against
joint and several obligors, copartners, promisors, or the indorsers of promissory
notes, in which the writ or process may not be served on all the defendants, and
judgment may be obtained against those served with process, such writ, process
or judgment, shall not be a bar to recovery in another suit against the defendant or
defendants, not served with process.? And that in all cases of amicable confession
of judgment by one or more of several obligors, copartners or promisors, or the
indorsers of promissory notes, such judgment shall not be a bar to recovery, in such
suit or suits as may have to be brought against those who refuse to confess judg-
ment.’°
And the act of 1848 provides, that where a judgment shall be obtained against
two or more copartners, or joint or several obligors, promisors or contractors, the
death of one or more of the defendants shall not discharge his or their estate or
estates, real or personal, from the payment thereof; but the same shall be payable
by his or their executors or administrators, as if the judgment had been several
against the deceased alone.”
In any suit or suits which may be brought against the executors or administrators
of a deceased eopartner, for the debt of the firm, it shall not be necessary to aver on
the record, or prove on the trial, that the surviving partner or partners is or are
insolvent, to enable the plaintiff to recover.”
Where a judgment shall be hereafter recovered against one or more of several
copartners, or joint and several obligors, promisors or contractors, without any plea
in abatement, that all the parties to the instrument or contract on which the suit is
1 2 Johns. Cas. 374.
21C.&P.89. 14 East 210.
8 1 Dall. 248. 58. & R. 86. 1 W. & 240. But
a suit against partners does not abate by the death
of ong of the defendants pending the action. Purd.
1 Act 6 April 1830 3 2. Purd. 1647, If, in
a joint action, the plaintiff avcept a confession of
judgment from one of the defendants, it is a bar
to further proceedings against the others; the act
has roference to subsequent separate actions
55. against the parties. 1 Phila. 50.
* Collyer 420. MN Act 11 April 1848 23. Purd. 1647. The acts
5 Ibid. 428. 3 Penn. L. J. 878. were intended to obliterate the common law dis-
6 Thid. tinction between instruments joint, and those
71 Binn. 123. 78. & R. 365 joint and several, in the cases therein provided
8 3 Penn. St. 433.
9 Act 6 April 1830 21. Purd. 1646. This aot
includes proceedings before a justice. 3 W. 203.
lt is a remedial statute, and to be liberally con-
struod. 5 Penn. St. 401. 11 Ibid. 394. It is
applicable to cases, not only of joint contract, but
also of joint action. 6 Whart. 268. The original
process should be issued against all the defendants.
5 Penn. St. 402; but the second writ should be
issued only against the defendant not served, 6
Whart. 528; and from tho same forum, 14 Penn.
8t. 813; otherwise, it will not take the case out
of the statute of limitations. Ibid.
for. 27 Penn. St. 244. 2 Wood.101. They ren-
dor a deceased partner’s estate liable in the
first instance, whether the survivor be solvent or
insolvent. 32 Ponn. St. 115. 34 Ibid. 411.
61 Ibid. 258. It seems, that the judgment
recovered against the surviving partner, is not
evidence against the representatives of the de-
ceased partner, for they were no parties to it.
34 Penn. St. 411. If one of the defendants die,
after judgment, the survivor must he joined in a
scire facias to revive. 15 Phila. 279,
12 Act 11 April 1848 3 4. Purd. 1647,
PARTNERSHIP. 769
founded, are not made parties thereto, such judgment shall not be a bar to a
recovery in any subsequent suit or suits against any person or persons, who might
have been joined in the action in which such judgment was obtained, whether the
same shall be obtained amicably or by adversary process.!
By the act of 1873, it is provided, that whenever any judgment shall be obtained
gainst one,or more of the members of a partnership, upon any individual indebted-
aess of such defendant or defendants, any such creditor may have execution (by) fier?
facias, issued from the court where such judgment is entered: Provided, The same
be entered in the county where the chief office or place of business of the said part-
nership is or was last located ; which shall command the sheriff or other officer to
levy the sum of said judgment, with interest and costs of suit, upon the interest of
the defendant or defendants in said writ, of any personal, mixed or real property,
rights, claims and credits in such partnership, and thereupon proceed and sell: the
same; and the purchaser at such sale shall thereupon have a right to compel a
settlement of the partnership accounts of such partnerships, by proceeding in equity,
and to determine and receive the interest of said judgment-debtor or debtors in the
partnership property, rights, claims and credits aforesaid; in case of judgment
obtained or entered of record in a county, other than that wherein the chief office
or place of business of said partnership is or was located, the plaintiff may issue a
testatum writ of fiert facias, commanding the sheriff or other officer to proceed as in
other cases where such writ may issue, and levy the sum of said judgment, with
interest and costs of suit, in the same way and with the same force and effect as
herein provided in case of sale under execution of fieri facias: Provided, That
such rights, claims and credits shall be proceeded against and sold in the manner
provided in cases for the sale of personal property, except where real estate is taken
in execution, in which case the same shall be advertised three weeks, in manner as
is provided by law.
IX. LiMiTED PARTNERSHIP.
Limited partnerships for the transaction of any agricultural, mercantile, mechan-
ical, mining and transporting of coal, or manufacturing business, within this state,
may be formed by two or more persons, upon the terms, with the rights and powers,
and subject to the conditions and liabilities herein prescribed; but the provisions
of this act shall not be construed to authorize any such partnership for the purpose
of banking or making insurance.®
Such partnerships may consist of one or more persons, who shall be called general
partners, and who shall be jointly and severally responsible, as general partners now
are by law, and of one or more persons who shall contribute in actual cash payments,
a specific sum, as capital to the common stock, who shall be called special partners,
and who shall not be liable for the debts of the partnership beyond the fund s0 con-
tributed by him or them to the capital.*
The general partners only shall be authorized to transact business and sign for
the partnership, and to bind the same.
The persons desirous of forming such partnership shall make and severally sign
a certificate, which shall contain :—
I. The name or firm under which such partnership is to be conducted.
IL. The general nature of the business intended to be transacted.
III. The names of all the general and special partners interested therein, dis-
tinguishing which are general and which are special partners, and their respective
places of residence.
IV. The amount of capital which each special partner shall have contributed to
the common stock.
V. The period at which the partnership is to commence, and the period at which
it will terminate.®
1 Act 11 April 1848 35. Purd. 1647.
2 Act 8 April 1873. Ibid.. Since tae passage
of this act, the interest of a partner in partner-
ship property cannot be levied upon under an
ordinary i. fa. against such partner. 92 Penn.
Bt. 141. Ibid. 273. But the special writ given
by this act, and the ordinary fi. fa. may issue
simultaneously ; and both writs may be prosecuted
9.
at once, subject to the control of the court, until
the amount of the judgment be realized. 18
W.N. C. 380.
3 Act 21 March 1836 2 1. Purd. 1219.
4 Ibid. 2 2.
5 Thid. ¢ 3.
6 Ibid. 4. For form of certificate, see ante,
title “ Law Forms.”
770 PARTNERSHIP.
The certificate shall be acknowledged by the several persons signing the same, in
the manner and before the same persons, that deeds are now acknowledged, and the
said acknowledgment shall be certified in the same manner as the acknowledgment
of deeds are now certified. .
The certificate, so acknowledged and certified, shall be recorded and filed in
the office of the recorder of deeds of the proper county, in which the principal
place of business of the partnership shall be situated, and shall also be recorded
by him at large, in a book to be kept for that purpose, open to public inspection :
if the partnership shall have places of business situated in different counties, a
transcript of the certificate and of the acknowledgment thereof, duly certified by
the recorder in whose office it shall be filed, and under his official seal; shall be
filed and recorded in like manner in the office of the recorder of every such
county.”
At the time of filing the original certificate, with the evidence of the acknow-
ledgment thereof, as before directed, an affidavit of one or more of the general
partners shall also be filed in the same office, stating the sums specified in the certi-
ficate to have been contributed by each of the special partners to the common stock,
and to have been actually, and in good faith, paid in cash.*
No such partnership shall be deemed to have been formed, until a certificate
shall have been made, acknowledged, and filed and recorded, nor until an affi-
davit shall have been filed as above directed. And if any false statement be made
in such certificate or affidavit, all the persons interested in such partnership shall
be liable for all the engagements thereof, as general partners.*
The partners shall publish the terms of the partnership, when registered, for at
least six weeks immediately after such registry, in two newspapers, to be designated
by the recorder of deeds of the county in which such registry shall be made, and
to be published in the county or counties in which their business shall be carried
on; and if such publication be not made, the partnership shall be deemed general.®
The terms of the partnership required to be published shall consist of—
I. The name of the firm under which such partnership shall be conducted.
II. The general nature of the business intended to be transacted.
III. The names of the general partners, and their respective places of residence.
IV. The aggregate amount of capital contributed by the special partners to the
common stock.
V. The period at which the partnership is to commence, and the period at which
it will terminate.®
Affidavits of the publication of such notice, by the printers of the newspapers in
which the same shall be published, may be filed with the recorder, directing the
same, and shall be evidence of the facts therein contained.”
Every renewal or continuance of such partnership beyond the time originally
fixed for its duration, shall be certified, acknowledged and recorded, and an affidavit
of a general partner be made and filed, and notice be given in the manner herein
required for its original formation, and every such partnership which shall be other-
wise renewed or continued, shall be deemed a general partuership.®
Every alteration which shall be made in the name of the partners, in the nature
of the business, or in the capital or shares thereof, or in any other matter specified in
the original certificate, shall be deemed a dissolution of the partnership, and every
such partnership which shall in any manner be carried on after any such alter-
ation shall have been made, shall be deemed a general partnership, unless renewed
as a special partnership, according to the provisions of the last section.®
The capital of the firm may be increased, either by taking in new special partners,
or new subscriptions of capital from the partners previously in the firm; such
increase being made in pursuance of the consent of the partners, as expressed in the
original articles of partnership, or in any subsequent instrument of writing.”
Kvery such increase of capital shall be duly acknowledged, certified and recorded ;
1 Act 21 March 1836 2 5. Purd. 1220. See 7 Act 21 March 1836 310. Purd. 1220.
Graydon’s Forms 29, 8 Ibid. 2 11. For form of notice and aff-
2 Act 21 March 1836 @ 6. davit of publicati rie
® Ibid. 7. See Graydon’s Forms 37. Forms.” publication, see ante, title “Law
Ibid. 2 8. 9 Act 21 March 1836 3 12
5 Ibid. 39. 16 WNC, Bam @12. Purd. 1221. See
6 Act 21 April 1858. Purd. 1220.
PARTNERSHIP. 771
but no neglect in recording the certificate of any such increase of capital, or of any
sale or transfer of the interests or shares of the special partners, or any of them,
shall be construed to operate as a dissolution of the firm, or to make the special
partners liable as general partners.’
Suits in relation to the business of the partnership may be brought and conducted
by and against the general partners, in the same manner as if there were no special
partners.’
No part of the sum which any special partner shall have contributed to the capi-
tal stock shall be liable for any debts previously contracted by the general partners;
nor shall any part of such sum be withdrawn by him, or paid or transferred to him
in the shape of dividends, profits or otherwise, at any time during the continuance of
the partnership ; but any partner may annually receive lawful interest on the sum so
contributed by him, if the payment of such interest shall not reduce the original
amount of such capital, and if, after the payment of such interest, any profits shall
remain to be divided, he may also receive his portion of such profits.’
If it shall appear, that by the payment of interest or profits to any special partner,
the original capital has been reduced, the partner receiving the same shall be bound
to restore the amount necessary to make good his share of capital, with interest.*
A special partner may, from time to time, examine into the state and progress of
the partnership concerns, and may advise as to their management ; but he shall not
transact any business on account of the partnership, nor be employed for that pur-
pose as agent, attorney or otherwise: if he shall interfere, contrary to these provisions,
he shall be deemed a general partner.®
The general partners shall be liable to account to each other and to the special
partners for the management of their concern, both in law and equity, as other
partners now are by law.
Every partner who shall be guilty of any fraud in the affairs of the partnership
shall be liable civilly to the party injured, to the extent of his damage.” :
Every sale, assignment or transfer of the property or effects of such partnership,
made by such partnership, when insolvent, or in contemplation of insolvency, or after
or in contemplation of the insolvency of any partner, with the intent of giving a
preference to any creditor of such partnership or insolvent partner, over other
creditors of such partnership, and every judgment confessed, lien created, or security
given, by any such partner, under the like circumstances, and with the like intent,
shall be void as against the creditors of the partnership.®
Every such sale, assignment or transfer of any of the property or effects of the
general or special partner, made by such general or special partner, when insolvent,
or in contemplation of insolvency, or after or in consideration of the insolvency of
the partnership, with the intent of giving to any creditor of his own, or of the part-
nership, a preference over the creditors of the partnership, and every judgment
confessed, lien created, or security given, by any such partner, under the like circum-
stances, and with the like intent, shall be void as against the creditors of the part-
nership?
Every special partner who shall violate any provision of the two last preceding
sections, or who shall concur in or assent to any such violation by the partnership,
or by any individual partner, shall be liable as a general partner.”
In case of the insolvency or bankruptcy of the partnership, no special partner
shall, under any circumstance, be allowed to claim as a creditor, until the claims of
all the other creditors of the partnership shall be satisfied.”
No dissolution of such partnership, by the acts of the parties, shall take place
' previous to the time specified in the certificate of its formation, or in the certificate
of its renewal, until a notice of such dissolution shall have been filed and recorded
in the recorder’s office in which the original certificate was recorded, and published,
once in each week for four weeks, in a newspaper printed in each of the counties
where the partnership may have places of business.”
1 Act 21 April 1258 3 4. Purd. 1221. 7 Act 21 April 1836 2 19. Purd. 1221.
2 Act 21 March 1836 2 14. Ibid. 8 Ibid. ; 20,
8 Ibid. 3 15. 9 Ibid. ¢ 21.
4 Thid. 3 16. 10 Ibid. 3 22,
5 Thid. 3 17. M Ibid. 2 23.
6 Thid. 2.18. 12 Thid. ¢ 24,
772 PARTNERSHIP. .
A general partner in any limited partnership may, with the assent in writing of
his partner, by deed duly acknowledged and recorded, or by last will and testament in
writing, sell, assign, dispose of, or bequeath his interest in such limited partnership :
and when such general partner dies without having disposed of his interest in such
limited partnership, his administrator or executor may, in like manner, sell, assign,
and transfer his interest therein for the benefit of his estate; and on every such
sale, transfer, or bequest, a corresponding alteration shall be made in the name or
firm under which the business of such partnership is conducted, and the same shall
be forthwith acknowledged, certified, recorded and published, in the same manner
as is provided by law in the ease of the original formation of the partnership.
A special partner, with the assent of his partner, in writing, first had and
obtained, may sell or assign his interest in a limited partnership, without causing
thereby a dissolution of the partnership.?
The consent of the partners to a sale or transfer, by either the general or special
partners, of their respective interests in the partnership, may be given in advance,
either in the original articles of partnership, or other like instrument; and a sale
or transfer of any part or share of the interest in the firm of any partner, if made
in pursuance of the articles of copartnership, or previously expressed consent of
the partners as aforesaid, shall be equally valid as a sale of the whole interest of any
one or more of the partners. And it shall further be lawful for the general
partner or partners, or either of them, to purchase part or the whole of the interest
or shares of one or more of the special partners.
The insolvency of any special partner shall not cause a dissolution of the limited
partnership, but his interest therein shall be sold by his assignees, for the benefit of
his creditors.‘
When any special partner shall die, without having disposed of his interest in
the limited partnership, his executor or administrator may either continue his
interest therein, for its unexpired term, for the benefit of his estate, or may sell the
same at public auction, under the direction of the orphans’ court of the county
in which the principal place of business of such partnership may be, in the
same manner as the estates of intestates are now by law sold; testamentary dis-
positions, in writing, of the interest of special partners may also be made. The
decease of special partners shall not dissolve such limited partnership, unless, by
the agreement between the parties, it is provided that such decease shall have that
effect.°
Hivery alteration in such limited partnership, according to the provisions of this
resolve (act), shall be notified to the general partner, and shall be duly acknowledged,
certified and recorded, as in the case of the original formation of such partner-
ship.
It shall and may be lawful for any special partner to make his contribution tc
the common stock of any limited partnership, he may become a member of, in cash,
goods or merchandise: Provided, That when such contributions are made in goods
or merchandise, the same shall first be appraised, under oath, by an appraiser, who
shall be appointed by the court of common pleas of the county in which such
partnership is to be carried on: And provided also, That in the certificate required
by law, the nature and value of the said goods shall be fully set forth and
described.” _
The business of the partnership shall be conducted under a firm, in which the
names of the general partners only shall be inserted, without the addition of
the word “company,” or any other general term; and if the name of any spe-
cial partner shall be used in such firm, with his privity, he shall be deemed a
general partner.®
The business of the partnership shall be conducted under a firm, in which the
names of all the general partners shall be inserted, except, that when there are
more than two general partners, the firm name may consist of either two of such
partners, with the addition of the words “and company ;” but the said partnership
1 Act 16 April 1838. Purd. 1299, 5 Act 16 April 1838. Purd. 1222.
2 Thid. 6 Thid.
8 Act 21 April 1858 2 2. Purd.1222, T Act 30 March 1865 2 1. Ibid.
# Act 16 April 1838. Ibid. 8 Act 21 March 1836 4 13. Ibid.1293,
PARTNERSHIP. 773
shall put up, upon some conspicuous place on the outside, and in front of the build-
ing in which it has its chief place of business, some sign, on which shall be painted,
in legible English characters, all the names, in full, of all the members of said’
partnership, stating who are general, and who are special partners.
The firm name of any limited partnership may consist of the name of any general
partner, with the addition of the words “and company,” notwithstanding the name
of such general partner may be common to him and any special partner; but the
said partnership shall put up the sign required by the act of 30th March 1865.7
There can be no limited partnership in this state, unless formed in strict compli-
ance with the statute.
If the capital of a special partner be contributed in “ credits,” instead of an actual
cash payment, he is liable as a general partner, though the affidavit be not inten-
tionally false.* So, if the certificate state that the capital was paid in cash, when
in fact it was paid by a post-dated check, though the check was paid when due.
But if there be an actual cash payment, it is sufficient, without regard to the source
from whence it was derived, if the transaction be bond fide. A payment in the
checks of third persons (conceded to represent cash) is sufficient."
Where evidence is given to show, prima facie, that the special partner did not
pay in the amount specified in the affidavit, such affidavit is not even prima facie
rebutting evidence.®
A mistake in the publication, stating that $5000 had been put in, instead of
$2000, renders the special partners general.? But where, in an action to charge
special partners as indorsers, it appeared, that the published notice stated that the
partnership would commence 16 Nov. 1837, whereas, the certificate filed stated 16
Oct. 1837; it was held, that unless the error of the publication was designed to
deceive, or the indorsement made before 16 Nov. 1837, the special partners were
not liable. So, a mistake in the publication of the names of the partners (ag
Argale for Argall) will not vitiate the publication; whether or not the mistake
tended to mislead, should be left to the jury.™
A publication within three days after the registry, is sufficient. It is enough, if
the terms of the partnership be published in a daily paper, once in each week, for
six successive weeks.”
No formal notice of the dissolution of the firm, at the end of the prescribed
period, is necessary.
Where a third person enters the firm, as a general partner, the special partner-
ship is dissolved, and if there be a renewal, and not a new cash payment by the
former and continuing special partner, but the cash paid into the former special
partnership remains with the new firm, the special partner becomes a general part-
ner of the new firm.* A failure to record the renewal of a special partnership
renders the special partner liable as a general one.’® And it must appear by the
affidavit of the general partner, that the capital contributed by the special partner
remains unimpaired and available for creditors.’ . ;
An alteration, by the general partner, without the knowledge of the special part-
ner, in the nature of the business provided for in the articles of copartnership, does
not convert the special partner into a general one.”
The purchase of real estate for the benefit of the firm, to title to which is taken
in the names of all the partners, with the knowledge of the special partner, is a virtual
withdrawal by him of part of his capital.” :
Negotiating the purchase of real estate for the firm, will render the special part-
ner liable as a general one. He may wind up the affairs of the firm on a dissolu-
tion ;» but if it be stipulated in the articles, that the son of the special partner
1 Act 30 March 1865 32. Purd.1223, See17 1° 5 Hill 309.
W.N.C. 204. 11 24 Wend. 496.
2 Act 21 February 1868 3 1. Purd.1223. 2 Thid.
5 38 Penn. St. 53. 18 10 Paige 261.
4 62 N. Y.'513. 14 10 Penn. St. 47.
5 69 Ibid. 148. 33 Pitts. L. J. 169. 15 89 Ibid. 163.
610 J. & Sp. 36; 73 N. Y. 590. 1616 W.N. C. 549. .
7 34 Penn. St. 344. 1 44 Penn, St. 145; 4 Phila, 312
8 5 Hill 309. See 34 Penn. St. 344. 38 Ibid. 18 5 Hill 309.
153, 19 Tbid. See 44 Penn. St. 156.
9 6 Hill 479. 3 Denio 436. 20 3 Phila, 122.
774 PARTNERSHIP.
shall keep the books, and have a general superintendency over the business, at a
salary, and that the general partners shall sign no note or check, without the son’s
‘knowledge and approval, it will render the partnership a general one.’
_ An assignment to a trustee for the benefit of creditors, after the firm has become
insolvent, or in contemplation of insolvency, is void as against the creditors of the
firm, if any preference be given to one creditor or class of creditors over another,
or if it provide for the payment of a debt to the special partner, ratably with the
other creditors of the firm, or before all the general creditors are satisfied in full
for their debts.2_ It may be doubted, whether the general partner has the right to
make av assignment of all the partnership effects to a trustee, for any purpose,
without the assent of the special partner.? A court of equity will not appoint a
receiver of the effects of a special partnership, on the ground that a creditor of the
firm is about to obtain judgment for a large amount, and to issue execution, whereby
he will obtain a preference.t A voluntary assignee of a limited partnership cannot
avoid an assignment made contrary to the provisions of the act; he represents only
the assignors, not the creditors.®
The provisions of the 21st section of the act of 1836 can only be invoked by
the firm-creditors.* A judgment confessed by one partner to another, to secure the
amount of the capital stock advanced by such partner, who had agreed to enter into
a special partnership, but became a general partner, by reason of non-compliance
with the requisitions of the act, is valid against a separate creditor of the partner
who confessed the judgment.’ But a confession of judgment by the general part-
ner to a third person, for money advanced to the special partner, which formed his
contribution to the firm, is not valid as against the creditors of the firm.®
Where a limited partnership is dissolved by agreement of parties, before the
period fixed by the original certificate, it continues, as to persons dealing with
the firm, without actual notice, until the notice required by the act has been filed,
recorded and published for four weeks, as prescribed by the statute.?
The 21st and 22d sections of the act of 1836 apply only to existing partnerships,
not to one which has been dissolved.’
A misappropriation of the partnership fund by the general partner, does not
render the special partner liable as a general one, if he were not privy to the trans-
action,"
If a limited partnership remove its place of business to another county, and do
not file a new certificate in such county, the partnership becomes a general one.”
The adoption of the firm name of Bullock’s Sons, the special partners being
brothers of the general ones, does not render the former generally liable, if the sign
required by the act be properly exhibited1® But where a firm is composed of one
special and two general partners, the use of the names of the two general partners,
with the addition of the words “and company” as a firm name, is unauthorized by
any act of assembly, and will render the special partner generally liable.
1 38 Penn. St. 153. 8 106 Ibid. 280. See 44 Ibid. 150.
2 6 Paige 577. 8 11 N, Y..97.
3 Ibid. : 10 75 Penn. St. 437.
4 Beebe ev. Boswell, Com. Pleas, Phila., 22 1 87 Ibid. 506.
January 1853. MS. 12 43 N. Y. 68.
5 26 Penn. St. 108. 13 10 Phila. 309.
6 3W.N. OC. 304. 414 W.N. 0.12. Ibid. 89.
™ 6 Penn. St. 490.
[ 775 J
Party-CHalls.' —
No ACTION will lie to recover the moiety of the cost of a party-wall, under the
act of 1721,1 until the second house is actually begun. If it be begun, and a breach
be made in the wall, before payment, the first builder may maintain trespass, or, it
seems, he may waive the trespass, and bring assumpsit for money paid, laid out, &c.?
The moiety of the cost of a party-wall is a personal charge against the builder
of the second house, and not a den on the house itself. Therefore, the purchaser of
the second house is not liable to the claim of the first builder, who has neglected
or declined to insist upon the payment before the wall was broken into,* and on
payment of the moiety, by the owner of the adjoining lot, to the first builder,
the claim is satisfied, and a purchaser from the first builder cannot afterwards
recover the amount, when a second building is erected, although he has no notice
of ie payment, and no instrument acknowledging the payment has been put on
record.‘
The first builder upon adjoining lots, in a town, is bound to use suitable materials,
and build them skilfully, in the foundation and wall of partition; for if, upon the
excavation for and construction of a house upon the adjoining lot, notwithstanding
the use of proper and ordinary care and diligence, the first walls should fall, in con-
sequence of their defects, it must be regarded as a loss without injury.
A party-wall must be built without openings or windows overlooking the adjoiners.
Tt must be a solid wall.é
On the completion of a building, the party-wall is the property of the owner of
the house, and not of the contractor.’
The party by whose order a house is erected is the builder, and liable for the
value of the party-wall, although the house was erected under a contract for a gross
sum, “including party-walls,’” which had been paid. The right to compensation
for a party-wall is personal to the first builder: hence, where a house was erected
on land conveyed to husband and wife, and the heirs of the wife, the husband and
his creditors are entitled to the compensation.
A court of equity will restrain a builder from using his neighbor’s party-wall,
before payment of a moiety of the cost thereof, by injunction.?
In all conveyances of houses and buildings, the right to and compensation for,
the party-wall built therewith, shall be taken to have passed to the purchaser, unless
otherwise expressed ; and the owner of the house for the time being, shall have all
the remedies in respect of such party-wall, as he might have in relation to the house
to which this is attached.” By this act, the party-wall is created real estate, and
passes by a conveyance of the land, unless excepted in the deed." The act, how-
ever, is not retrospective in its operation, and does not operate on deeds executed
before its passage.”
The decision of the surveyor directing the removal of an insufficient party-wall,
is conclusive, and no appeal lies from it to the common pleas.”
A city surveyor has no right to enter upon property which has been inclosed by
a fence for upwards of twenty-one years, in order to settle or regulate a disputed
line between adjoining owners.”
2 Purd. 1458. 8 9 Penn. St. 501.
21 Dall. 346. 92Am.L. J. 327. 1 Pars. 494.
3 Ibid. 10 Act 10 April 1849 34. Purd. 1459.
458. &R.1. 10 Penn. St. 156, 220, 11 30 Penn. St. 372. 15 Leg. Int, 270. 8 Phila.
57 W. 460. 264.
661 Phila. 118. 81 Ibid. 54. 6 Phila. 401. 12 14 Penn. St. 435. 17 Ibid. 363.
' 14, W. N.C. 419. But this rule is restricted to 13 23 Ibid. 34.
the city of Philadelphia. 2 Pears. 293. 147 Phila. 348.
72 Am. L. J. 191, 326. But see act 10 April
1849. Purd. 1459,
[ 776 ]
Pawns or Pledges.
I. Act of assembly. II. Judicial authorities.
I. Aot 16 June 1836. Purd. 831.
Sxct. 23. Goods or chattels of the defendant in any writ of fier? facias, which shall
have been pawned or pledged by him as security for any debt or liability, or which
have been demised, or in any manner delivered or bailed, for a time, shall be liable to
sale, upon execution, nevertheless, to all and singular the rights and interests of the
pawnee, bailee or lessee, to the possession or otherwise, of such chattels or goods, by
reason of such pledge, demise or bailment.
Il. The contract of pledge is a bailment or delivery of goods and chattels by one
man to another, to be holden as a security for the payment of a debt, or the perform-
ance of an engagement, and upon the express or implied understanding that the
thing deposited is to be restored to the owner as soon as the debt is discharged or the
engagement have been fulfilled.’
Possession of the property is essential to the existence of a pledge, but the posses-
sion may be according to the nature of the subject. And after a sale of the goods,
under an execution against the pawnor, the pawnee is entitled to the possession, until
redeemed by the purchaser.*
A pawnee has a special property in the pledge, and may assign it, and the
assignee may consequently assert his title to it, against the owner, or one standing in
his place.®
When the goods are pledged for an indefinite period of time, the pawnee cannot
sell them without notice to the person by whom they were pledged.® A pledge for
a loan of money to be repaid at a fized time, may be sold by the pledgee, after the
time for redemptiom has gone by, and a demand for repayment duly made; pro-
vided reasonable notice be also given to the pledgor, of the time and place of the in-
tended sale. And the law is the same, where the pledge is a promissory note of a
third person, which will not mature until long after the time fixed for repayment of
the loan.’
The pawnee of goods may recover their full value, in trespass, against a stranger
who takes them away, although they are pledged to him for less, being answerable for
the excess. A pawnee or lessee of goods may maintain trespass against the owner
of the goods, as well as against a stranger, for taking them away during the existence
of his property in them.®
If the pawn be laid up, and the pawnee robbed, through the want of ordinary care
on his part, he is answerable, otherwise he is not; though if the pawnee useth the
thing, as a jewel, watch, &c., that will not be the worse for wearing, which he may
do, it is at his peril, and if he is robbed, he is answerable to the owner, as the using
occasions the loss, &c. Although a pawnee use the pawn tortiously, yet he is answer-
able by action only; he does not thereby forfeit his lien.”
If a man put a chattel into the possession of a mechanic, for the purpose of repair,
and the mechanic pledge it, the owner may maintain trover against the pawnbroker,
without previously tendering the sum for which it was pledged.”
Where property is pledged to which the pledgor has no title, and which the
pledgor has no right to pledge, the pledgee, in the absence of a special contract to the
contrary, may restore it to the true owner; and in an action by the pledgor may set up
the right of the real owner as a defence.”
A livery-stable keeper has no property, as pawnee, in a horse at livery, which
1 Purd. 1650, title “ Pawnbrokers.” 75 Clark 471. 39 Penn. St. 243.
2 Add. on Cont. 319, 1 Ruth. Inst. b. I. ob. 85 Binn. 457.
4,35. 93 Whart. 258,
S2N. Y. 443, Bright.52, 3W.&S. 14 10 3 Salk. 268. 1 Bulst. 181.
41N,. Y. 20. 1 1 Bro. 43.
54 W, 414, 12 6 Exch. 341.
61 Bro. 174.
PENALTIES. TT
makes him liable to an attachment. He has a lien, which does not prevent a levy
upon execution against the owner of the horse.!
If the goods pledged cannot be found by the officer charged with an execution
against the pledgor, the creditor may resort to an attachment-execution ; they are
cumulative remedies,?
Penalties,
[See Actions at Law.]
ALL actions, suits, &c., which shall be brought for any forfeiture upon any penal
act of assembly, whereby the forfeiture is limited to the commonwealth only, shall
be brought within two years after the offence was committed ; and where the benefit
of any forfeiture is limited to the commonwealth and to the prosecutor, all actions,
suits, &c., shall be brought within one year after the offence was committed ; and
in the latter case, in default of any person prosecuting, then the same may be
prosecuted for the commonwealth, any time within one year after that year ended.®
In an action of debt for penalties, the general evidence for the plaintiff is proof
of the commission of the act upon which the penalty has accrued, and if a time be
limited by the statute for bringing the action, that the action was brought within
that time, and where the venue is local, that the action is brought in the proper
county.
Where an act of assembly, creating an offence, provides ‘that the person so
offending, on conviction thereof before a justice of the county, shall pay a fine of
five dollars for every such offence, to be recovered, as debts of equal amount are by
law recovered, by any person who may sue for the same,”’ the offender need not be
convicted, either by indictment or by a summary process, before the justice, but
simply in an action of debt, by a judgment for the penalty, if proved guilty of’ the
offence.®
But where an act of assembly imposes a penalty, and gives authority to justices
of the peace to take cognisance of the violation, but prescribes no method or form
for the prosecution, the conviction must be in accordance with the rules of the
common law.®
The act of 7th May 1857 provides, that for all breaches of ordinances of the city
of Philadelphia, the original process shall be the same as in cases of surety of the
peace; reserving, however, the remedy by writ of certiorari.” But by act of 15th
March 1858, where the penalty demanded is $50, and upwards, actions of debt
shall be brought in the corporate name of the city.®
Where an offence made penal by statute is in its nature single, and cannot be
severed, there the penalty shall be only single, though several persons may join in
the commission of it; but when the offence is in its nature several, there every
offender is separately liable for the penalty.? Where two are sued jointly for vio-
lation of an ordinance, it must appear that both were connected in the act com-
plained of. Spas
When a penal action is to be brought within one year, the day of committing the
offence is inclusive.”
The record must show a title in the plaintiff under some clause in the statute
under which he sues; but where there is also an exception, or clause amounting to
an exception from the penalty, from some particular circumstances, the rule as
13 Phila. 219. 7 Purd. 909. But this act does not justify a
217 W.N. C. 166. summary arrest, without process. 11 Phila. 163,
3 Purd. 1217. See title “Limitation of Ac- 8 Purd. 909. But a private citizen cannot
tions.” sue for the branch of a penal ordinance, without
* Roscoe’s Evid. 321. authority from the proper municipal officer, 4
510 W. 382. And in such case, the summons W.N. OC. 215. :
may be in the ordinary form. 2 Del. Co. R. 490. 9 Cowp. 610. Esp. on Penal Actions 69.
62 Pars, 265. 13 W.N.C. 142. See title 102 Phila. 44.
“Summary Convictions.” 11 Hob. 139.
778 PERJURY.
to where it is necessary to set it out, and where not, is this :—If. the exception be
part of the enacting clause itself which gives the penalty, there it must be nega-
tived ; but where the exception is by another and distinct clause in the statute, or
where it arises under another statute, then it need not be set out, but must be used
by the defendant as matter of defence. ;
Every record of a judgment against a defendant for the violation of an ordinance,
must show—1. That the magistrate had jurisdiction of the subject-matter: 2. The
section of the ordinance violated: 3. That the penalty imposed conforms to the fine;
4, That evidence was adduced in support of the charge, or that the defendant con-
fessed it: 5. That witnesses were sworn or affirmed: 6. That the offence was com-
mitted within the city or borough, enacting the ordinance: 7. That judgment was
duly entered against the defendant. If the record omit to show any of these find-
ings, the judgment will be reversed on certiorari.?
If the ordinance imposes a penalty upon the doing of an act “ wantonly and
without reasonable cause,’ the record must show that the defendant did the act
complained of “wantonly and without reasonable cause.’”* very essential ingre-
dient of the offence must be set out by the magistrate, or his judgment will be
reversed.*
The burgess of a borough has no jurisdiction of an action for the recovery of a
penalty for the breach of a borough ordinance ; his jurisdiction is purely criminal,
as a conservator of the peace.°
Perjury and Subornation of Perjury.
I. Provisions of the Penal Code. III. Form of an information, and warrants for
II. Judicial authorities and definitions. perjury and subornation of perjury.
J. Aor 31 Maron 1860. Purd 528.
Srcr. 14. If any person shall, wilfully and corruptly, commit wilful and corrupt
perjury, or shall by any means procure or suborn any person to commit wilful and
corrupt perjury, on his or her oath or affirmation, legally administered, either before
any committee of the legislature of this commonwealth, or in any judicial proceed-
ing, matter or cause which may be depending in any of the courts thereof, or before
any judge, justice, mayor, recorder, alderman or other magistrate, or before any
arbitrator, prothonotary, clerk, notary-public, commissioner or auditor, appointed
by any court of this commonwealth, or in any deposition taken pursuant to the
laws of this commonwealth, or'the rules, orders and directions of any court, arbi-
trator or judge thereof, or preparatory and for the purpose of obtaining any rule or
order of court, or of a judge or arbitrator; or if any person in taking any other
oath or affirmation required, or that may hereafter be required, by any act of assem-
bly of this commonwealth, shall be guilty of wilfully and corruptly making a false
oath or affirmation; or if any person shall procure or suborn any other person to
make any such false oath or affirmation; every person so offending shall be guilty
of a misdemeanor, and, on conviction, be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding five
hundred dollars, and to undergo an imprisonment, by separate or solitary confine-
ment at labor, not exceeding seven years, and shall be for ever disqualified from
being a witness in any matter in controversy.
II. The object of the 14th section of the Penal Code was to put at rest the nice
distinctions that have been raised, whether perjury can only be committed in a
court of justice or in the course of justice, or whether a given oath has been taken
in a judicial proceeding properly so called, or otherwise. These captious objections
are removed by defining precisely the kinds of oath which, if false, constitute per-
jury. The extension of the crime to any person taking an oath required by an act
117. R.144, 7 Ibid. 27. See 2 Pars, 232,
289.
24 Phila. 145. 1 Ibid. 518. 2 Ibid. 48. 1
Wood. 417.
3 1 Phila. 517.
4 4 Ibid. 148. See 23 Penn. St. 521.
5817 W.N. 0.170.
PERJURY. 779
of assembly, who shall be guilty of making a false oath, supersedes much past, and
obviates the necessity of any future, legislation on the subject.
Perjury consists in swearing falsely and corruptly, contrary to the belief of the
witness ; and not in swearing rashly and inconsiderately, according to his belief.?
Perjury cannot be predicated in an extra-judicial oath?
A prosecution for perjury alleged to have been committed in an affidavit of
defence in a civil action, cannot be instituted until after final judgment therein‘
There must be two witnesses, upon an indictment for perjury; one alone is not
sufficient, because there is in that case only one oath against anothers But the
testimony of a single witness is sufficient to prove that the defendant swore as charged
in the indictment.®
Subornation of perjury is the offence of procuring another to take such a false
oath as constitutes perjury in the principal.’ ,
IIL. InroRMATION OF A WITNESS IN A CASE OF PERJURY.
UNION COUNTY, ss.
Tue information of A. B., of Beaver township, in the county of Union, yeoman, taken
upon oath before J. R., one of the justices of the peace in and for the said county, the
tenth day of June, a. p. 1880, who saith, that on the 12th day of May last, at about eight
o’clock in the morning, he set out in company with a certain ©. D. from Selin’s Grove,
and arrived that same day, towards evening, at Danville, in Columbia county, and
remained there all that evening and night. (Signed) A. B.
Signed and subscribed, June 10th, a. p. 1880, before J. R., Justice of the Peace.
WARRANT FOR PERJURY.
UNION COUNTY, ss.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To the Constable of the township af Beaver, in the county of Union, greeting :
Wuereas, a certain C. D., of the township of Beaver, in the county of Union, currier,
being duly summoned to appear before J. R., one of our justices of the peace in and fon
the said county, to give evidence in a certain action depending before our said justice,
wherein G. H. was plaintiff, and H. J. defendant, did appear accordingly, on the 22d day
of May last, at the office of our said justice, in the county aforesaid, and then and there
being duly sworn by our said justice to say the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but
the truth, the said C. D., among other things, did depose and say that he was present at
New Berlin, on the 12th day of May last, at about noon, and saw G. H. pay to II. J.
twenty dollars, which the said H. J. said was in full of all demands which the said G. H.
had against the said H. J. And whereas, A. B., of Beaver township aforesaid, yeoman,
hath made oath before our said justice, that on the said 12th day of May last, about eight
o’clock in the morning, he set out in company with the said C. D. from Selin’s trove,
and arrived that same day towards evening, at Danville. And whereas, there are strong
grounds to suspect that the aforesaid C. D. hath been guilty of wilful and corrupt perjury
by swearing falsely in the said cause: you are, therefore, hereby commanded to take the
said C. D. and bring him before the said J. R. forthwith, to answer the said charge, and
further to be dealt with according to law. Witness the said J. R., at Selin’s Grore afore-
said, on the 11th day of June, a. p. 1880.
J.B., Justice of the Peace. [szat.]
WARRANT FOR SUBORNATION OF PERJURY.
LEBANON COUNTY, ss.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To the Constable of the township of B-——, in the county of Lebanon, greeting :
Wuernas, a certain J. D., of the township of H——, in the county of Lebanon, farmer,
being duly summoned to appear before J. R., Esquire, one of our justices of the peace in
and for the said county, to give evidence in a certain action depending before our said
justice, wherein J. W. is plaintiff, and J. B. defendant, did appear accordingly on the
first day of June instant, at the office of our said justice, in the borough of Lebanon, in
the county aforesaid, and then and there being duly sworn by our said justice, to declare
1 Report on the Penal Code 14. 13 W. N.C. 129. But see 1 Kulp 468.
2 Bald. 370. 5 Whart. Cr. L. 3 802. 6 Penn. St.170 For
3 96 Penn. St. 285. the qualifications of this rule, see 1 Greenl. dvid.
4 3 Clark 265. Leave may, however, be givento 3 257.
the district-attorney to send up a bill of indict- 6 12 Met. 225.
ment, to save the bar of the statute of limitation. 7 4 Bl. Com. 137. See 10 Sawyer 133.
780 PHYSICIANS.
the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, the said J. D. did depose and say,
that he was present at Lebanon, on the twenty-ninth day of December last, at about noon
and saw J. B. pay J. W. twenty dollars, which the said J. W. said was in full of all
demands: And whereas, J. L., of H—— township, aforesaid, farmer, hath made oath
before our said justice, that on thesaid twenty-ninth day of December last, at about eight
o’clock in the morning, he set out in company with J. W. from Lebanon, and arrived
that same day towards evening at Lancaster: And whereas, there are strong grounds
to suspect that the aforesaid J. D. hath been guilty of wilful and corrupt perjury, by
swearing falsely in the said cause; and that the said J. D. hath been suborned to com-
mit the said wilful and corrupt perjury, by his master, the said J. B.: These are there-
fore to command you to take the said J. B., and bring him before the said J. R. forthwith,
to be examined in the premises, and further to be dealt with according to law. Witness
the said J. R.. at Lebanon, aforesaid, the first day of July, in the year of our Lord one
thousand eight hundred and eighty.
a = oF J. R., Justice of the Peace. [sEa..]
Physictans.
I. Acts of assembly. II. Judicial decisions.
I. Aor 24 Marcy 1877. Purd. 1678.
Sxor. 1. The standard qualifications of a practitioner of medicine, surgery or
obstetrics, shall be and consist of the following, namely: a good moral character, a
thorough elementary education, a comprehensive knowledge of human anatomy,
human physiology, pathology, chemistry, materia medica, obstetrics, and practice
of medicine and surgery and public hygiene.?
Sor. 2. It shall be unlawful, after the passage of this act, for any person to
announce himself or herself as a practitioner of medicine, surgery or obstetrics, or to
practise the same, who has not received, in a regular manner, a diploma from a char-
tered medical school, duly authorized to confer upon its alwmni the degree of doctor
of medicine :? Provided, That this act shall not apply,to any resident practitioner of
medicine, surgery or obstetrics who has been in such continuous practice in this
commonwealth, for a period of not less than five years previous to the passage
of this act.
Sror. 3. Before any person shall engage in the practice of medicine, surgery or
obstetrics, in this commonwealth, or who has not a diploma as provided for in sec.
tion second. of this act, such person shall make affidavit, under oath or affirmation,
before the prothonotary of the county where such person intends practising, setting
forth the time of continuous practice, and the place or places where such practice
was pursued in this commonwealth ; thereupon the prothonotary shall enter the
same of record in a book specially provided therefor, to be kept in his office, and
open to the inspection of the public; and for such service he shall receive the sum
of two dollars, to be paid by the affiant, one-half for the use of the prothonotary,
the other for the use of the county.
Sror. 4. Any person who shall attempt to practise medicine or surgery for a valu-
able consideration, by opening a transient office, within this commonwealth, or who
shall, by handbill or other form of written or printed advertisement, assign such tran-
sient office, or other place, to persons seeking medical or surgical advice or prescrip-
tion, or who shall itinerate from place to place, or from house to house, and shall
propose to cure any person, sick or afflicted, by the use of any medicine, means or
agency whatsoever, for a valuable consideration, shall, before being allowed to prac-
tise in this manner, appear before the clerk of the court of quarter sessions of the
county wherein such person desires to practise, and shall furnish satisfactory evi-
dence to such clerk that the provisions of this act have been complied with; and
shall, in addition, take out a licence for one year, and pay into the county treasury,
for the use of such county, the sum of fifty dollars therefor ; whereupon, it shall
be the duty of such clerk, to issue such applicant a proper certificate of licence, on
payment of the fee of five dollars for his services.
1 See 4 Phila. 128, 21 Susa. Tt. Mhran aa
PHYSICIANS. 781
Sscr. 5. Any person who shall violate or fail to comply with any of the provisions
of this act, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor; and on conviction before
any court, shall be sentenced to pay a fine not less than two hundred dollars nor
more than four hundred dollars, for each and every such offence, for the use of the
county wherein such demeanor is committed.
Aot 8 Junge 1881. Purd. 1679,
Srcr. 1. The prothonotary of each county shall purchase a book of suitable size,
to be known as the medical register of the county (if such book has not been pur-
chased already), and shall set apart one full page for the registration of each
practitioner, and when any practitioner shall depart this life, or remove from the
county, he shall make a note of the same at the bottom of the page, and shall per--
form such other duties as are required by this act.!
Sucr. 2. Every person who shall practise medicine or surgery, or any of the
branches of medicine or surgery, for gain, or shall receive or accept for his or her
services, as a practitioner of medicine or surgery, any fee or reward, directly or
indirectly, shall be a graduate of a legally chartered medical college or university,
having authority to confer the degree of doctor of medicine (except as provided
for in section five of this act), and such person shall present to the prothonotary
of the county in which he or she resides or sojourns, his or her medical diploma,
as well as a true copy of the same, including any indorsements thereon, and shall
make affidavit before him that the diploma and indorsements are genuine; there-
upon the prothonotary shall enter the following in the register, to wit: the name
in full of the practitioner, his or her place of nativity, his or her place of residence,
the name of the college or university that has conferred the degree of doctor of
medicine, the year when such degree was conferred, and in like manner any other
degree or degrees that the practitioner may desire to place on record, to all of which
the practitioner shall likewise make affidavit before the prothonotary; and the pro-
thonotary shall place the copy of such diploma, including the indorsements, on file
in his office, for inspection by the public.
Scr. 3. Any person whose medical diploma has been destroyed or lost, shall
present to the prothonotary of the county in which he or she resides or sojourns, a
duly certified copy of his or her diploma, but if the same is not obtainable, a state-
ment of this fact, together with the names of the professors whose lectures he or
she attended, and the branches of study upon which each professor lectured, to all
of which the practitioner shall make affidavit before the prothonotary ; after which,
the practitioner shall be allowed to register, in manner and form as indicated in
section two of this act; and the prothonotary shall place such certified statement
on file in his office, for inspection by the public.
Sxcr. 4, Any person who may desire to commence the practice of medicine or
surgery in this state, after the passage of this act, having a medical diploma issued
or purporting to have been issued by any college, university, society or association in
in another state or foreign country, shall lay the same before the faculty of one of
the medical colleges or universities of this commonwealth for inspection, and the
faculty, being satisfied as to the qualifications of the applicant and the genuineness
of the diploma, shall direct the dean of the faculty to indorse the same, after which
such person shall be allowed to register, as required by section two of this act.
Szor. 5. Any person who has been in the continuous practice of medicine or
surgery in this commonwealth since 1871, without the degree of doctor of
medicine, shall be allowed to continue such practice, but such person shall never-
theless appear before the prothonotary of the county in which he or she resides,
and shall present to him a written statement of these facts, to which the practitioner
shall make affidavit. Thereupon, the prothonotary shall enter the following in the
register, to wit: the name in full of the practitioner, his or her place of nativity,
his or her place of residence, the time of continuous practice in this commonwealth,
and the place or places where such practice was pursued, to all of which the practi-
tioner shall likewise make affidavit; and the prothonotary shall place the certified
statement on file in his office, for inspection by the public.
1 The prothonotary’s duties are merely ministerial. 16 W. N. C. 528.
782 ; PHYSICIANS.
Sxor. 6. Every practitioner who shall be admitted to registration shall pay to
the prothonotary one dollar, which shall be compensation in full for registration,
and the prothonotary shall give a receipt for the same. atta oa
Seor. 7. Any practitioner who shall present to the faculty of an institution for
indorsement, or to any prothonotary, a diploma which has been obtained fraud-
ulently, or is in whole or in part a forgery, or shall make affidavit to any false
statement to be filed or registered, or shall practise medicine or surgery without
conforming to the requirements of this act, or shall otherwise violate or neglect to
comply with any of the provisions of this act, shall be deemed guilty of a misde-
meanor, and on conviction, shall be punished, for each and every offence, by a fine
of one hundred dollars, one-half to be paid to the prosecutor and the other half to
be paid to the county, or be imprisoned in the county jail of the proper county for a
term not exceeding one year, or both or either, at the discretion of the court.
Secr. 8. Nothing in this act shall be so construed as to prevent any physician
or surgeon, legally qualified to practise medicine or surgery 1n the state in which he
or she resides, from practising in this commonwealth ; but any person or persons
opening an office or appointing any place where he or she may meet patients or
receive calls, shall be deemed a sojourner, and shall conform to the requirements of
this act.?
Act 18 May 1893. Purd. 1680.
Srcr. 1. There shall be established a medical council of Pennsylvania, consisting of
the lieutenant-governor, the attorney-general, the secretary of internal affairs, the
superintendent of public instruction and the president of the state board of health
and vital statistics, and the presidents of the three state boards of medical examiners
provided for in this act.
Srcr, 2. The said council shall be known by the name and style of the medical
council of Pennsylvania, and may make and adopt all necessary rules and regulations
and by-laws not inconsistent with the constitution and the laws of this commonwealth,
or of the United States, and shall have power to locate and maintain an office within
this state for the transaction of business; five members of the said council shall con-
stitute a quorum for the transaction of business.
Sect. 3. The said council shall organize at Harrisburg within ten days from the date
of the organization of three boards of medical examiners, and shall elect from its own
number a president and a secretary who shall also act as treasurer, both of whom shall
hold their offices for one year, or until their successors are chosen.
Seor. 4. The members of the said council shall receive no salary, except the secre-
tary and treasurer, who shall receive a salary of not over five hundred dollars, and who
shall file with the president of the council a bond in the sum of one thousand dollars
conditioned for the faithful performance of his duties. The necessary expenses of the
said council shall be paid out of the appropriation made in section sixteen of this act,
and any balance remaining from the appropriation after the disbursements herein
specified shall be paid into the treasury of the commonwealth.
Szcr. 5. The said medical council shall hold two stated meetings in each year at
Harrisburg, and may hold special meetings at such times and places as it may deem
proper. It shall supervise the examinations conducted by the three state boards of
medical examiners of all applicants for license to practise medicine and surgery in this
commonwealth, and shall issue licenses to practise medicine and surgery to such
applicants as have presented satisfactory and properly certified copies of licenses from
state boards of medical examiners, or state boards of health of other states, as provided
for in section thirteen of this act, or as have successfully passed the examination of
one of the three state boards of medical examiners, but all such examinations shall be
made by the state boards of medical examiners established in section six of this act.
And the said medical council shall have no power, duty or function, except such
powers, duties and functions as pertain to the supervision of the examinations of
applicants for licenses to practise medicine and surgery and to the issuing of licenses
to such applicants as have successfully passed the examination of one of the state
boards of medical examiners, or have presented satisfactory and properly certified
copies of licenses from state boards of medical examiners, or state boards of health of
other states, as provided for in section thirteen of this act.
lSee° tT * nm aa.
PHYSICIANS, 783
Szct. 6. It is further enacted, that from and after the first day of March, Anno
Domini one thousand eight hundred and ninety-four, there shall be and continue to be
three separate boards of medical examiners for the state of Pennsylvania, one repre-
senting the medical society of the state of Pennsylvania, one representing the homeo-
pathic medical society of the state of Pennsylvania, one representing the eclectic
medical society of the state of Pennsylvania.
Each board shall consist of seven members, and.each of said members shall serve
for a term of three years from the first day of March next after his appointment, with
the exception of those first appointed, who shall serve as follows, namely: Two of
each board for one year, two of each board for two years, and three of each board for
three years, from the first day of March, Anno Domini one thousand eight hundred
and ninety-four.
The governor shall appoint the members of said boards of examiners, respectively,
from the full lists of the members of the said medical societies, which lists shall, on or
before the first day of January, one thousand eight hundred and ninety-four, and
annually thereafter, be transmitted to the governor under the seal and signed by the
secretary of the society so nominating. From these lists of nominees respectively the
governor shall, during the month of January, Anno Domini one thousand eight hun-
dred and ninety-four, appoint three separate boards of medical examiners, each board.
to be composed exclusively of members of the same medical society.
In case of failure of any or all of said medical societies to submit lists, as-aforesaid,
the governor shall appoint members in good standing of the corresponding society, or
societies, entitled to nominate without other restriction.
Each one of the said appointees must be a registered physician in good standing and
shall have practised medicine or surgery under the laws of this state for a period of
not less than ten years prior to such appointment.
The governor shall fill vacancies, by death or otherwise, for unexpired terms of
said examiners from the respective lists submitted by the said medical societies, and
may remove any member of any of said boards for continued neglect of the duties re-
quired by this act, or on recommendation of the medical society of which said mem-
bers may be in affiliation, for unprofessional or dishonorable conduct.
The governor shall in his first appointments designate the number of years for
which each appointee shall serve. The appointments of successors to those members
whose term of office will expire on the first day of March of each year shall be made
by the governor during the month of January of such year, upon the same conditions
and requirements as hereinbefore specified with reference to the appointment of three
separate examining boards, each to be composed exclusively of members of the same
medical school and society as hereinbefore provided.
Sect. 7. Said boards shall be known by the name and style of boards of medical
examiners of the state of Pennsylvania. Every person who shall be appointed to
serve on either of said boards shall receive a certificate of appointment from the secre-
tary of the commonwealth.
Each of said boards shall be authorized to take testimony concerning all matters
within its jurisdiction, and the presiding officer for the time being of either of said
boards, or of any of the committees thereof, may issue subpcenas and administer oaths
to witnesses. ,
Each of said boards of examiners shall make and adopt all necessary rules, regula-
tions and by-laws, not inconsistent with the constitution and laws of this state, or of
the United States, whereby to perform the duties and transact the business required
under the provisions of this act; said rules, regulations and by-laws to be subject to
the approval of the medical council of Pennsylvania established by this act.
Srcr. 8. From the fees provided by this act the respective boards may pay, not to
exceed said income, all proper expenses incurred by its provisions, and if any surplus
above said expenses shall remain at the end of any year, it shall be apportioned among
said examiners pro rata according to the number of candidates examined by each:
Provided, That the medical council shall keep separate accounts of all fees received
from physicians applying for licenses to practise medicine and surgery, and shall not
devote any such fees to the uses of the council, or to the uses or remuneration of any
other examining board than that of the society with which the physician who pays
the fees wishes to be affiliated.
784 PHYSICIANS.
Sror. 9. The first meeting of each of the examining boards respectively shall be
held on the first Tuesday of April, one thousand eight hundred and ninety-four, suit-
able notice in the usual form being given with the notice of their appointment by the
secretary of the commonwealth to each of the members thereof, specifying the time
and place of meeting.
At the first meeting of each of the boards respectively an organization shall be
effected by the election, from their own membership, of a president and secretary.
For the purpose of examining applicants for license, each of said boards of medical
examiners shall hold two or more stated or special meetings in each year, due notice
of which shall be made public at such times and places as they may determine.
At said stated or special meetings a majority of the members of the board shall con-
stitute a quorum thereof, but the examination may be conducted by a committee of
one or more members of the board of examiners duly authorized by said boards.
Szor. 10. The several boards of medical examiners shall, not less than one week
prior to each examination, submit to the medical council of Pennsylvania questions
for thorough examination in anatomy, physiology, hygiene, chemistry, surgery, ob-
stetrics, pathology, diagnosis, therapeutics, practice of medicine and materia medica ;
from the lists of questions so submitted the council shall select the questions for each
examination, and such questions for each examination shall be the same for all candi-
dates, except that in the departments of therapeutics, practice of medicine and
materia medica, the questions shall be in harmony with the teachings of the school
selected by the candidate.
Sect. 11. Said examinations shall be conducted in writing in accordance with the
rules and regulations prescribed by the medical council of Pennsylvania and shall em-
brace the subjects named in section ten of this act. After each such examination the
board having charge thereof shall, without unnecessary delay, act upon the same. An
official report of such action, signed by the president, secretary and each acting member
of said board cf medical examiners, stating the examination average of each candidate
in each branch, the general average and the result of the examination, whether suc-
cessful or unsuccessful, shall be transmitted to the medical council. Said report shall
embrace all the examination papers, questions and answers thereto. All such exami-
nation papers shall be kept for reference and inspection for a period of not less than
five years.
Sect. 12. On receiving from any of said boards of medical examiners such official
report of the examination of any applicant for license, the medical council shall issue
forthwith to each applicant who shall have been returned as having successfully passed
said examination, and who shall have been adjudged by the medical council to be duly
qualified for the practice of medicine, a license to practise medicine and surgery in the
state of Pennsylvania.
The medical council shall require the same standard of qualifications from all candi-
dates, except in the departments of therapeutics, practice of medicine and materia
medica, in which the standard shall be determined by each of the boards respectively.
Every license to practise medicine and surgery issued pursuant to this act shall be
subscribed by the officers of the medical council and by each medical examiner who
reported the licentiate as having successfully passed said examinations. It shall also
have affixed to it, by the person authorized to affix the same, the seal of this common-
wealth.
Before said license shall be issued it shall be recorded in a book to be kept in the
office of the medical council, and the number of the book and page therein containing
said recorded copy shall be noted upon the face of said license. Said records shall be
open to public inspection, under proper restrictions as to their safe keeping, and in all
legal proceedings shall have the same weight as evidence that is given to the convey-
ance of land.
Srcr. 13. From and after the first day of July, Anno Domini one thousand eight
hundred and ninety-four, any person not theretofore authorized to practise medicine
and surgery in this state, and desiring to enter upon such practice, may deliver to the
secretary of the medical council, upon the payment of a fee of twenty-five dollars, a
written application for license, together with satisfactory proof that the applicant is
more than twenty-one years of age, is of good moral character, has obtained a compe-
PHYSICIANS. 785
tent common school education, and has received a diploma conferring the degree of
medicine from some legally incorporated medical college of the United States, or a
diploma or license conferring the full right to practise all the branches of medicine
and surgery in some foreign country.
Applicants who have received their degree in medicine after the first day of July,
one thousand eight hundred and ninety-four, must have pursued the study of medi-
cine for at least three years, including three regular courses of lectures, in different
years, in some legally incorporated medical college or colleges, prior to the granting of
said diploma, or foreign license, and after the first day of July, eighteen hundred and
ninety-five, such applicants must have pursued the study of medicine for at least four
years, including three regular courses of lectures, in different years, in some legally in-
corporated medical college or colleges, prior to the granting of said diploma or foreign
license. Such proof shall be made, if required, upon affidavit.
Upon the making of said payment and proof the medical council, if satisfied with
the same, shall issue to said applicant an order for examination before such one of the
state boards of medical examiners as the applicant for license may select.
In case of failure at any such examination, the candidate, after the expiration of
six months and within two years, shall have the privilege of a second examination by
the same board to which application was first made, without the payment of an addi-
tional fee.
‘ Applicants examined and licensed by state boards of medical examiners or state
boards of health of other states, on payment of a fee of fifteen dollars to the medical
council, and on filing in the office of the medical council a copy of said license certi-
fied by the affidavit of the president or secretary of such board, showing also that the
standard of acquirements adopted by said state board of medical examiners or state
board of health, is substantially the same asis provided by sections eleven, twelve and
thirteen of this act, shall without further examination receive a license conferring on
the holder thereof all the rights and privileges provided by sections fourteen and
fifteen of this act.
Szcr. 14, From and after the first day of March, Anno Domini one thousand eight
hundred and ninety-four.
No person shall enter upon the practice of medicine or surgery in the state of Penn-
sylvania, unless he or she has complied with the provisions of this act, and shall have
exhibited to the prothonotary of the court of common ‘pleas of the county in which
he or she desires to practise medicine or surgery, a license duly granted to him or her
as hereinbefore provided, whereupon he or she shall be entitled upon the payment of
one dollar to be duly registered in the office of the prothonotary of the court of com-
mon pleas in the said county, and any person violating any of the provisions of this
act shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof in the court of
quarter sessions of the county wherein the offence shall have been committed, shall
pay a fine of not more than five hundred dollars for each offence.
Srct. 15. Nothing in this act shall be construed to interfere with or punish com-
missioned medical officers serving in the army or navy of the United States, or in the
United States Marine Hospital service while so commissioned, or medical examiners
of relief departments of railroad companies while so employed, or any one while
actually serving as a member of the resident medical staff of any legally incorporated
hospital, or any legally qualified and registered dentist exclusively engaged in the
practice of dentistry, or shall interfere with or prevent the dispensing and sales of
medicines or medical appliances by apothecaries, pharmacists, or interfere with the
manufacture of artificial eyes, limbs or orthopedical instruments or trusses of any kind
for fitting such instruments on persons in need thereof, or any lawfully qualified phy-
sicians and surgeons residing in other states or countries, meeting registered physicians
of this state in consultation, or any physician or surgeon residing on the border of a
neighboring state and duly authorized under the laws thereof to practise medicine and
surgery therein whose practice extends into the limits of this state: Provided, That
such practitioner shall not open an office, or appoint a place to meet patients or re-
ceive calls, within the limits of Pennsylvania, or physicians duly registered in one
county of this state called to attend cases in another county but not residing or open-
ing an office therein.
50
786 POISONS.
Nothing in this act shall be construed to prohibit the practice of medicine and
surgery within this commonwealth by any practitioner who shall have been duly
registered before the first day of March, Anno Domini one thousand eight hundred
and ninety-four, according to the terms of the act, entitled ‘‘ An act to provide for the
registration of all practitioners of medicine and surgery,”’ approved the eighth day of
June, Anno Domini one thousand eight hundred and eighty-one, and one such
registry shall be sufficient warrant to practise medicine and surgery in any county in
this commonwealth.
In England, physicians cannot sue for fees. But in Pennsylvania, the law is held
differently ; and this difference is founded on practice and acts of assembly.’
Medicine furnished and medical attendance given during the last illness of decedent
[the person deceased], to be paid first by executors, &c.”
In taking an inquisition of death, super viswm corporis, the coroner, as a public
agent, has authority to order a post-mortem examination at the public charge; and
the physician or surgeon employed by him, to perform such service, is employed by
the county, and is entitled to a reasonable compensation from the county, for his ser-
vices.*
The law does not imply on the part of a physician, an undertaking to use the
highest professional skill; but he is liable for malpractice resulting in the death
of the patient, if such malpractice were the proximate cause of it.* In an action
against a surgeon for malpractice, the question is, whether he possessed that reason-
able degree of learning and skill which is ordinarily regarded as necessary to qualify
him for the exercise of the profession; and whether he exercised it in the particular
case.6 The burden of proving malpractice rests upon him who alleges it; no pre-
sumption of want of proper skill and attention arises from the mere fact that a cure
is not effected ;® to affect a physician’s claim to compensation, actual want of skill
must be shown."
A certificate of the secretary of a medical college of his belief that the diploma, of
a medical college of another state, is genuine, and legally issued, does not entitle it to
registration.®
Poisons.
Act 31 Marca 1860. Purd. 529.
Sect. 70. No apothecary, druggist or other person, shall sell or dispose of, by retail,
any morphia, strychnia, arsenic, prussic acid or corrosive sublimate, except upon the
prescription of a physician, or on the personal application of some respectable in-
habitant of full age, of the town or place in which such sale shall be made; and in
all cases of such sale, the word poison shall be carefully and legibly marked or placed
upon the label, package, bottle or other vessel or thing in which such poison is con-
tained; and when sold or disposed of, otherwise than under the prescription ofa
physician, the apothecary, druggist or other person selling or disposing of the same,
shall note in a register, kept for that purpose, the name and residence of the person
to whom such sale was made, the quantity sold, and the date of such sale; any person
offending herein, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and, on conviction, be sentenced to
pay a fine not exceeding fifty dollars.
Secr. 86. If any person shall unlawfully apply or administer to another, any chloro-
form, laudanum or other stupefying and overpowering drug, matter or thing, with
15S. & BR. 416. 510 Hun 358; 75 N. Y. 12. Sees. c. 2 Langs.
2 Purd. 591. 206; 60 Barb, 485 ; 50 N. Y. 690.
83 Penn. St. 462. 67 Phila. 138.
413 Am. L. Reg. 587. 72 W.N. C, 272.
816 Ibid. 5388. 17 Ibid. 394.
POISONS. 787
intent thereby to enable such offender or any other person, to commit, or with the
intent to assist such offender or other person, in committing any felony, every such
offender shall be guilty of a felony, and, being convicted thereof, shall be sentenced to
pay a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars, and undergo an imprisonment, by sepa-
rate and solitary confinement at labor, not exceeding five years.?
Act 23 May 1878. Purd. 538.
Srct. 1. No person shall put or expose in any public place or highway, nor on his
own lands, outside of his buildings, nor on the lands of any other person, any poison,
or admixture thereof, with the intent that the same shall be taken or swallowed by
any bird, fowl or wild animal.
Sect. 2. Any person violating this act shall, on conviction before any alderman or
justice of the peace, be subjected to a fine of twenty dollars to the use of the com-
monwealth.
Act 24 May 1887. Dard, 529.
Sxcr. 10. A poison in the meaning of this act shall be any drug, chemical or prepa-
ration, which, according to standard works on medicine or materia medica, is liable to
be destructive to adult human life, in quantities of six grains or less.
No person shall sell at retail any poisons, except as herein provided, without affixing
to the bottle, box, vessel or package containing the same, a label, printed or plainly
written, containing the name of the article, the word ‘‘ poison,’’ and the name and
place of business of the seller, nor shall he deliver poison to any person without satis-
fying himself that such poison is to be used for legitimate purposes.
It shall be the further duty of any one selling or dispensing poisons, whisk are
known to be destructive to adult human life, in quantities of five grains or less, before
delivering them, to enter in a book kept for this purpose the name of the seller, the
name and residence of the buyer, the name of the article, quantity sold or disposed of,
and the purpose for which it is said to be intended, which book of registry shall be
preserved for at least two years, and shall at all times be open to the inspection of the
coroner or courts of the county in which the same may be kept.
The provisions of this section shall not apply to the dispensing of physicians’ pre-
scriptions, specifying poisonous articles, nor to the sale to agriculturalists of such
articles as are commonly used by them as insecticides. Any person failing to comply
with the provisions of this section shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon
conviction thereof shall be punished by a fine of not less than five nor more than fifty
dollars for each and every offence.
The 86th section of the Penal Code punishes the administration of stupefying mixt-
ures, with criminal intent, whether the object of the offender has been consummated
or not; inasmuch as the condition in which the party injured is placed by the admin-
tration of the drug, renders the conviction of the consummated crime always difficult,
and sometimes impossible.”
The act of 1878 does not appear to embrace dogs and cats, which are neither “ birds,
fowls nor wild animals.’ Being a highly penal law, it must be taken strictly.
1 Purd. 477. 2 Report on the Penal Code 25. See Wharton & Stillé’s Med. Jurisp. 3 443,
[ 788 ]
Woor Laws.
[See DusertIon.]
V. Persons liable for the support of others.
VI. Duties of overseers.
VII. Fines and penalties.
VIII. Forms of orders, &c.
I. Relief aud employment of the poor.
II. Seitlemente.
III. Ordeis of removal.
IV. Appeals.
I. RELIEF AND EMPLOYMENT OF THE POOR.
Ir shall be the duty of the overseers of every district, from time to time, to
provide, as is hereinafter directed, for every poor person within the district, having
a settlement therein, who shall apply to them for relief. .
If such poor person be able to work, but cannot find employment, it shall
be the duty of the overseers to provide work for him, according to his ability,
and for tais purpose they shall procure suitable places and a sufficient stock of
materiais.*
It shall be lawful for the overseers of any district, with the concurrence and
under the directions of the supervisors of the township, to employ such poor per-
son, being a male of sufficient ability, in opening or repairing any road or highway
within the district.®
If such poor person, by reason of age, disease, infirmity or other disability, be
unable to work, it shall be the duty of the overseers to provide him with the neces-
sary means of subsistence.*
It shall also be the duty of the overseers of every district to furnish relief
to every poor person within the district, not having a settlement therein, who
shall apply to them for relief, until such person can be removed to the place of his
settlement.®
No person shall be entered on the poor book of any district or receive relief from
any overseers, before such person, or some one in his behalf, shall have procured an
order from two magistrates of the county for the same, and in case any overseer
shall enter in the proper book or relieve such poor person without an order, he shall
forfeit a sum equal to the amount or value given, unless such entry or relief shall
be approved of by two magistrates as aforesaid.®
It shall be Jawful for the overseers of every district to contract with any person
for a house or lodging for keeping, maintaining and employing such poor persons
of the district, as shall be adjudged proper objects of relief, and there to keep,
maintain avd employ such poor persons ;. and, with the approbation of the court of
quarter sessions of the proper county, for the same purpose, to purchase suitable
real estate, in fee or for a term of years, and to improve the same, and to receive the
benefit of their work and labor, for and towards their maintenance and support ;
and, if any poor person shall refuse to be kept and employed in such house, or
upon such real estate, he shall not be allowed to receive relief from the overseers
during such refusal.”
It shall be lawful for the overseers of every district, with the approbation and
consent of two or more magistrates of the same county, to put out as apprentices
all poor children whose parents are dead, or by the said magistrates found to be
unable to maintain them, so as that the time or term of years of such apprentice-
1 Act 13 June 1836 31. Purd. 1702, It is an
indictable offence to sell the keeping of paupers to
the lowest bidder. 9 Penn. St. 48-9. The act of
9 March 1771 216 (1 Sm. 338) erecting the over-
seers into a corporation, is not repealed, it seems,
by the act of 1836. 9 Penn. St. 219. Hach town-
ship is annually to elect two overseers. Purd.
1638. And they are not jointly liable for money
collected by cach other in their official capacity.
3 W. & S. 367.
2 Act 13 June 1836 3 2. Purd. 1702.
‘Northampton,
5 Act 13 June 1836 3 3. Purd. 1702,
+ Ibid. 2 4.
5 Ibid. ¢ 5.
6 Ibid. 2 6. This section is repealed as to the
cities of Pittsburgh and Allegheny, by act 25 Jan-
uary 1853. Pamph. 12. And in the counties of
chuylkill and Somerset, orders
of relief may be made by a single justice, by act
4 March 1850. Pamph. 122.
T Act 13 June 1836 2 7, as amended by act 30
June 1885. Purd, 1703.
POOR LAWS. 739
ship, if a male, do expire at or before the age of twenty-one years, and if a female, at
or before the age of eighteen years.!
The word “district’’ in this act, shall be construed and taken to mean “ town-
ship’’ and “borough,” and every other territorial or municipal division, in and for
which officers charged with the relief and support of the poor are directed or author-
ized by law to be chosen ; but nothing in this act contained, shall be taken to repeal or
otherwise interfere with any special provision made by law for any city, county, town-
ship, borough or other territorial or municipal divisions.”
Any overseer or poor director of any poor district, who is or shall be appointed
by the court of quarter sessions, according to law, in any of the counties of this
commonwealth, may, at his discretion, and without order or certificate from a jus-
tice of the peace or alderman, enter upon the poor-book, grant relief to, or admit to
the poor-house of his proper district, any poor or indigent person or persons, entitled
by the laws of this commonwealth to such aid or relief; and in no case shall such
order be required or fees allowed to any justice or justices, alderman or aldermen
therefor.®
In all counties of this commonwealth, where poor or almshouses are not provided
by law for indigent persons in and for said counties, and where said individuals are
found travelling about, and not residents of said counties, and meet with accidents or
injuries, from any cause whatever, so as to render them either temporarily or perma-
mently injured, or a charge, or causing their death, all the expenses so incurred shall
be borne by the county in which said accident, or injury or death may have occurred,
and not by the boroughs or townships wherein said accident, or injury or death did
occur. It shall, however, be temporarily the duty, when such persons are injured, of
the overseers of the poor of said boroughs or townships, wherein said accidents occur,
to look after and attend to the wants of all such parties injured or killed, and, as soon
as convenient thereafter, inform the county commissioners, or their regularly author-
ized clerk, of the injuries, or condition, or death of all such parties ; and any expenses
thereby incurred, by said borough or townships, shall be paid or refunded by the
counties through their county commissioners.*
When such accident, or injury or death occurs, any individual may give the in-
formation to either the borough or township poor authorities, or to the county com-
missioners or their authorized clerk, and it shall be the duty of any of those parties so
informed, to look after and attend to the same.®
Should any of the afore-mentioned officials, the county commissioners, their regu-
larly authorized clerk, or the overseers of the poor of any borough or township,
when notified or informed of the same, neglect or refuse to attend to the duties
herein imposed upon them, it shall be considered a misdemeanor in office, for which
they shall be liable in law, as for all other neglects or refusal to perform their legal
duties as county, borough or township officials: Provided, That the provisions of
this act shall in no wise prevent the county commissioners of said counties so ren-
dering aid and assistance to parties whose residences are elsewhere, and can be
ascertained, from recovering the same of the localities where the last settlement of
said parties is; and it shall be their duty and they are hereby authorized so to do,
in the same manner that like claims are now recoverable by one poor district against
another: Provided, further, That this act shall not apply to the afore-mentioned
1 Act 13 June 1836 3 8. Purd.1704. See tion of county poor-houses therein. Also Purd.
tit. “ Apprentices,” VII. tit. ‘“ Almshouses.”
2 Act 13 June 1836 3 45. Ibid. See act4 % Act 12 May 187921. Purd.1705.
June 1879 (Purd. 1700) erecting each county ‘ Act 25 June 188531. Purd. 1703.
into a poor district, and authorizing the erec- 5 Thid. 2 2.
790 POOR LAWS.
counties which have a poor or almshouse erected for the care of parties of this
character.’
Hereafter no poor district in this commonwealth shall be held or adjudged liable to
any person for or on account of relief of any kind or nature whatsoever afforded by
him to any poor, sick or destitute person for more than ten days immediately pre-
ceding the time when an order for the relief of such poor person shall have been pro-
cured and delivered to the overseers of the poor of the district wherein such relief
shall have been afforded.’
In each and every county of this commonwealth in which a poor or almshouse
for the support, care and shelter of the needy and indigent is not maintained by
and at county expense, it shall be the duty of the poor directors or overseers of the
poor of the several poor districts in such counties to provide all needy, sick and in-
jured indigent person or persons in their said several districts with necessary support,
shelter, medicine, medical attendance, nursing, and in case of death, burial, whether
said needy, sick and injured indigent person or persons have a legal settlement in the
poor district in which they thus require and receive assistance or not; but all ex-
penses thus incurred for the relief, support, nursing, care or burial of such indigent
person or persons whose legal settlement is unknown shall be borne by the county in
whicn the poor district furnishing such relief is located.
And in the event of any such poor district having assumed or paid the expenses
thus incurred for the relief or burial of any indigent person or persons whose legal set-
tlement is unknown, the county in which such poor district is located shall be liable
to such poor district in an action of asswmpsit in a civil court for the amount thus ex-
pended or incurred, and the want of an order of relief or approval order shall not be
a bar to recovery.*
The overseers are bound to maintain every poor person within their district not
having a settlement therein, who shall apply to them for relief, until he can be re-
moved to the place.of his last settlement; and if, in an attempt so to remove him, he
be left in a township not legally chargeable with his support, he may be returned to
the township where he first became chargeable.‘
Where a pauper was chargeable to a township, which was divided, it was held
that the overseers of the township which maintained him after the division, might
maintain assumpsit against the other township, for a ratable proportion of the ex-
pense.°
The overseers are bound to pay the funeral expenses of a pauper, after his de-
cease.®
Tn cases of emergency, relief must precede the order of maintenance.’
II. OF SETTLEMENTS.
A settlement may be gained in any district :—
1. By any person who shall come to inhabit in the same, and who shall for him-
self and on his own account, execute any public office, being legally placed therein,
during one whole year.
2. By any such person as shall be charged with and pay his proportion of any
public taxes or levies for two years successively.
1 Act 25 June 1885 3 3. Purd. 1703, 53S.&R.117. And see 12 Penn. St. 92.
2 Act 23 May 1893. Purd. 1705. 68W.&S. 94.
® Act 6 June 1893. Purd. 1704. 7128. & R. 292. 9 Penn. St. 47. And seo 32
45 W.&S. 535. 107 P.S. 68. Ibid. 178, 38 Ibid. 160.
POOR LAWS. 791
3. By any person who shall bond jide take a lease of any real estate of the yearly
value of ten dollars, and shall dwell upon the same, for one whole year, and pay the
said rent.
4, By any person who shall become seised of any freehold estate within such district,
and who shall dwell upon the same, for one whole year.
5. By any unmarried person, not having a child, who shall be lawfully bound or
hired as a servant within such district, and shall continue in such service during one
whole year
6. By any person who shall be duly bound an apprentice by indenture, and shall
inhabit in the district with his master or mistress for one whole year.
7. By any indentured servant, legally and directly imported from Europe into this
commonwealth, who shall serve for the space of sixty days in the district into which
he shall first come: Provided, That if such servant shall afterwards duly serve in any
other district for the space of twelve months either with his first employer or his
assignee, he shall obtain a legal settlement in such other district.
8. By any mariner coming into this commonwealth, and by any other healthy per-
son coming directly from a foreign country into the same, if such mariner or other
person shall reside for the space of twelve months in the district in which he shall
first settle and reside.”
Every married woman shall be deemed, during coverture, and after her husband’s
death, to be settled in the place where he was last settled; but if he shall have no
known settlement, then she shall be deemed, whether he be living or dead, to be
settled in the place where she was last settled before her marriage.*
Every illegitimate child shall be deemed to be settled in the place where the mother
was legally settled at the time of the birth of such child.‘
If the last place of settlement of any person who shall have become chargeable,
shall be in any township which shall have been divided by the authority of the laws,
such person shall be supported by that township within the territory of which he re-
sided at the time of gaining such settlement.®
It shall be the duty of every housekeeper who shall receive into his house any
person who has not gained a legal settlement in some part of this commonwealth (all
mariners coming into this commonwealth, and every other healthy person coming
from a foreign country immediately into this commonwealth, only excepted), within
ten days after receiving such person, to give notice thereof in writing to the overseers
of proper district.®
If any housekeeper shall fail to give notice as aforesaid, and if the person so
received shall become poor and unable to maintain himself, and cannot be removed
to the place of his last legal settlement in any other state, if any such he hath, such
housekeeper shall be obliged to provide for and maintain such poor person, and in
case of the death of such poor person without leaving wherewithal to defray the
1 Amount of rent increased to ten pounds, in 4Thid. 211. See 48 Penn. St. 402. 64 [hid.
Philadelphia, by act 25 May 1840. Pamph.513. 166.
2 Act 13 June 1836 29. Purd. 1705. 6 Act 13 June 1836 312. Purd. 1706.
3 Ibid, 2 10, 6 Ibid. 13. See128. & R. 292-6.
792 POOR LAWS.
expense of his funeral, such housekeeper shall pay the overseers so much as they
shall reasonably expend for such purpose.?
If such housekeeper shall refuse to pay the charges aforesaid, the overseers shall
assess upon him the amount necessary to maintain such poor person, weekly, or such
sum as shal] be necessary to pay such funeral charges, and shall have power to col-
lect the same by warrant of distress; but if such delinquent shall have no goods or
chattels liable to distress, he may be committed to jail, there to remain until he shall
have paid the same, or shall be otherwise legally discharged.?
If any person shall bring, or cause to be brought, any poor person from any place
without this commonwealth, to any place within it, where such person was not last
legally settled, and there leave, or attempt to leave, such person, he shall forfeit
and pay the sum of seventy-five dollars for every such poor person, to be sued for and
recovered by the overseers of the district, into which such poor person may have
been brought, and moreover, shall be obliged to convey such poor person out of the
commonwealth, or support him at his own expense.
The place of settlement of the father is that of the children, until the latter
acquire a new settlement.* The place of birth is primé@ facie that of settlement,
when the settlement of the parents is unknown An idiot @ nativitate can acquire
no settlement.®
“Payment of a United States tax is not sufficient to confer a settlement.’ Buta
county tax is within the act ;° and it need not be a personal tax.®
A lease of real estate, in order to confer a settlement, need not be in writing ;
nor is it necessary that it should be for any fixed period of time.” A widow, by
leasing property, may acquire a settlement. The fraction of a day is not to be
regarded in the computation of the time.
Payment of rent by a surety is sufficient ;* and such payment need not be ia
money; it may be in labor, or otherwise, if of the value of $10 per annum.¥
A pauper gains a settlement by contracting for a lot, under a yearly rent-charge,
and building and residing thereon, though he obtain no deed for it.®
An unmarried woman, having a bastard child, may acquire a settlement by hiring
and service ;" it is not necessary that the hiring, but only that the service, should
be for a year.* But the service must be by virtue of a hiring ; service alone, with-
out hiring, will not gain a settlement.” To constitute a hiring, the consideration
need not be paid in money ;” but a contract that one shall provide a shop, loom
and tackle, and the other shall perform the labor of weaving, and that each shall
receive one-half of the profics, constitutes a partnership, and not a hiring within
the statute.”
An indented servant gains a settlement where he first serves sixty days, either
with the master to whom he was indebted, or with his assignee; and it is of no
‘eonsequence, that the assignment is voidable by the servant, provided he perform
his service under it. Although the assignment may be absolutely void, yet a ser-
vice performed to the assignee, in one township, with the consent of the master, in
another, is\a service with the master, in the township of the assignee, and obtains a
settlement there.”
A married woman will not lose her husband’s settlement by a divorce.® And
though she has a legal settlement in the township where her husband was settled
at the time of his death, this does not prevent her from acquiring a new settlement
by her own act, after his decease.“ An order removing a married woman to the place
1 Act 13 June 1836 3 14. Purd. 1706. 13145. & Bl. 816. 3 Luz. L. Obs, 310.
3 Thid. 5 15. 14 6 Penn. St. 262.
8 Ibid. ¢ 25. 16 11 Ibid. 254. 95 Ibid. 269,
£15 Penn. St.145. 44 Ibid. 60. 48 Ibid. 402. 16 2 Y.51. But a seizure, without residence, is
62 Ibid. 472. 43 Leg. Int. 153. not sufficient. 43 Leg. Int. 153.
5 32 Sm. 264. See 84 Penn. St. 429. 87 Ibid, 1% 42 Log. Int. 434.
19,294. 7W. N.C. 12. 18 5 Whart. 430. 2 Ash. 9.
6 17 Penn. St. 38. See 3 Whart. 71. 19 5 Penn. St. 283. 1 Penny. 408.
710 8. & R. 179. 208 W. 431. Sco 2 Ibid. 438. 5 Binn. 81.
8 5 Ibid. 417. 212 W. 342. See 1 Leg. Gaz. 42. 26 Pitts. L,
9 19 Pitts. L. J. 73, See 106 Penn. St. 446. J. 115.
40 11 Penn. St. 254, 22 5 Binn. 86.
11 3 Bright. Dig. 3604, pl. 13. And see91 Penn. % 15 Penn. St. 182-4. 87 Ibid, 19,
St. 404. 1 Kulp 340. 29 Pitts. L. J. 338, 24°18 Ibid. 17.
12 62 Penn. St. 472.
POOR LAWS. 793
where she was last legally settled, before her marriage, is not defective, because it
omits to state that her husband had no known legal settlement ; the court will not
presume that he had any such settlement.
The settlement of the father is that of the child, until the latter acquire a new
one; and if the township in which the father was settled be divided, after his
death, the place of settlement of the child is in the township in the territory of
which the father resided at his death; and that territory is to maintain the
pauper, whether he has been chargeable to the parent township or not2 The
removal of a father to another township does not affect the status of an insane pau-
per child, of full age.*
Where a person abandons his settlement in this state, and acquires one in another,
his status, on returning to this state, is that of a foreigner, with respect to the poor
laws. It is said to be otherwise, if he acquires no settlement in the other state to
which he removed.®
III. OrnpERS of REMOVAL.
On complaint made by the overseers of any district to one of the magistrates of the
same couniy, it shal] be lawful for the said magistrate, with any other magistrate of
the county, where any person has or is likely to become chargeable to such district
into which he shall come, by their warrant or order, directed to such overseers, to
remove such person, at the expense of the district, to the city, district or place where
he was last legally settled, whether in or out of Pennsylvania, unless such person
shall give sufficient security to indemnify such district to which he is likely to
become chargeable as aforesaid.” Provided, That it shall not be lawful, by virtue
of any order of removal, to separate any wife from her husband.®
It shall be the duty of the guardians or overseers of the city or district to which
such poor person may be removed, by warrant or order as aforesaid, to receive such
poor person, and if any such guardian or overseer shall refuse or neglect so to do,
he shall forfeit for every such offence the sum of twenty dollars, to be recovered as
hereinafter provided, and applied to the use of the poor of the district from which
such poor person may be removed as aforesaid.
Any person aggrieved by any such order of removal, may appeal to the next
court of quarter sessions, for the county from which such poor person may be re-
moved, and not elsewhere; and if there be any defect of form in such order, the
said court shall cause the same to be amended, without cost to the party, and after
such amendment, if the same be necessary, shall proceed to hear and determine the
cause upon its truth and merits: but no such cause shall be proceeded in, unless
reasonable notice shall have been given by the party appellant, to the overseers of
the district from which the removal shall have been made, the reasonableness
of which notice shall be determined by the said court, at the session to which the
appeal may be made, and if it shall appear to them that reasonable notice was not given, ”
they shall adjourn the appeal to their next session, and then determine the same.”
If any magistrate shall refuse to grant a warrant or order of removal as aforesaid,
it shall be lawful for the overseers aggrieved by such refusal, to appeal to the next
court of quarter sessions of the county in which such magistrate resides, who shall
thereupon hear and finally determine the same."
The district accepting a poor person, shall be liable to the district removing said
poor person, for costs and charges, in the same manner and to the same extent, that
they would have been, had the case been determined against such district, by the
court of quarter sessions, upon an appeal from the order of removal.”
Justices of the peace are incompetent, on the ground of interest, to grant an
order of removal from their own township." A township cannot be made charge-
able with the expense of maintaining a pauper, otherwise than by the previous order
of two justices.
1 5 Binn. 81. 8 Act 13 June 317. Purd. 1707.
2 15 Penn. St. 145. 9 Ibid. 2 18.
812 Ibid. 92. See3S.&R.117. 7W.N.C. 10 Thid. 2 19.
12, H Tbid. g 2. vee
4 3 Penny. 107. 12 Act 15 April . Pur
5 107 en aL 68. 138 2 Dall. 313 ; 1Y. 250. 3W.& S. 548 5
6 41 Leg. Int. 366. Ibid. 434. 13 Luz. L. Reg. 439.
¥ Act 13 June 1836 2 16. Purd. 1706. 14 2 W. 280.
794 POOR LAWS.
The order must state that the complaint was made by the overseers, and an ad-
judication that the pauper was likely to become chargeable ;+ but it need uot set
forth the evidence ;? and no intendment will be made against the order. The
pauper himself is not a party ;* but he cannot be removed, whilst so ill that his
life will be endangered by it.2 The order may be amended®
A pauper cannot be removed, except to his last place of legal settlement.” If an
unmarried indented female servant become pregnant, and be removed by her
mistress into another township, for the purpose of lying in, the expenses of which
the mistress is able and agrees to pay, the overseers of that township may, notwith-
standing, before the birth of the child, remove her to the place of her last legal
settlement.? Where children under the age of seven years are sent to the place of
their mother’s settlement for nurture, the expense of their maintenance is to be borne
by the place from which they are removed, and not by that to which they are sent.?
The settlement of a pauper can only be decided by two justices, or in a court of
quarter sessions, on appeal ; it cannot be collaterally determined, in an action before
a single justice, or in a court of law.!? An order of removal, followed by an ineffect-
ual attempt to appeal, after the time has elapsed for that purpose, is conclusive
evidence of his place of settlement, in a subsequent proceeding for that purpose ;
in such case, it is most proper to proceed on the first order of removal." Our courts
have no power to order the removal of a pauper to his place of settlement in another
state ; there is no mode by which such order can be carried into execution.”
Where there is no appeal, the overseers may be compelled to receive a pauper,
under an order of removal.¥
Where there has been an undue removal, and the order reversing it has been
affirmed on certiorari, the court may make an order for the intermediate expendi-
tures for the support of the pauper.”
IV. APPEALS.
For the more effectual preventing of vexatious removals and frivolous appeals,
the court of quarter sessions, upon every appeal in a case of settlement, or upon
proof being made before them of notice thereof, as aforesaid (though the appeal be
not afterwards prosecuted), shall, at the same session, order to the party in whose
behalf such appeal shall be determined, or to whom such notice did appear to
have been given, such costs and charges as the said court shall consider reasonable
and just, to be paid by the overseers or other person against whom such appeal
shall be determined, or by the person that gave such notice; and if the court shall
determine in favor of the appellant, that such poor person was unduly removed,
they shall at the same session, on demand, award to such appellant, so much money
as shall appear to them to have been reasonably paid by the city or district appel-
lant, towards the relief of such poor person, between the time of such undue removal
and the determination of such appeal, with costs as aforesaid.®
If any person. ordered to pay costs or charges as aforesaid, other than overseers
as aforesaid, shall live out of the jurisdiction of such court, it shall be the duty of
any magistrate of the county in which such person shall reside, on request to him
made, and on the production of a copy of such order, certified under the seal of
such court, to issue his warrant to levy the same by distress, and if no sufficient
distress can be had, to commit such party to the common jail, there to remain with-
out bail or mainprise, until such costs or moneys be paid, or until he be otherwise
legally discharged.®
If any overseer be ordered to pay costs or charges as aforesaid, and the township
liable therefor be out of the jurisdiction of such court, it shall be the duty of the
court of quarter sessions of the county in which such township is situate, on request ©
11 Y. 366 86S. & R. 562
21 Dall. 38 9 1 Ibid. 387
8 5 Binn. 81. 10 2 RK. 26.
47 W~. 173. U 34 Penn, St. 231. See 44 Ibid, 481
55 W.& 8. 536. 13 87 Ibid. 204. See 107 Ibid. 172,” i
6 2 Penny. 487. And the right of amendment 8 82 Ibid. 275.
is to receive a liberal construction. 25 Penn. St. 4 42 Leg. Int. 479.
6 1 Act 13 June 1836 920, Purd. 1
710 Pitts. L. J. 115. 16 Ibid. 3 21, 2 urd, 1708,
POOR LAWS. 795
to them made, and on the production of a copy of such order, certified under the
seal of the court making the same, to compel payment of such costs and charges
according to law.? :
If the justice have no jurisdiction, an appeal does not lie? No appeal lies
from an order, vacating one of two justices for the removal of a pauper.®
The appeal must be taken to the next court, whether notice of the order was
given or not.*
An informality in the proceedings of the justices cannot be taken advantage of,
after an appeal and decision on the merits.5 The quarter sessions is to decide on
the merits, without regard to defects in the order.
The appeal must be decided on legal evidence.*’ The order may be confirmed in
part, and quashed in part.§ An order confirmed, is conclusive against the appel-
lant, in favor of all the world; an order discharged, is conclusive between the
parties litigant ; an order quashed, is conclusive on neither.® The decision is con-
clusive upon a new township, subsequently created, by a division of one of them.!
On a certiorart, the supreme court is confined to a revision of the regularity of the
proceedings ;" there is no mode by which the facts can be legitimately betore that
court ;” and therefore, no appeal lies.%
Where the order is in part confirmed, and in part quashed, neither party is
entitled to costs.
V. PERSONS LIABLE FOR THE SUPPORT OF OTHERS.
The father and grandfather, and the mother and grandmother, and the children
and grandchildren of every poor person not able to work. shall, at their own charge,
being of sufficient ability, relieve and maintain such poor person, at such rate as
the court of quarter sessions of the county where such poor person resides shall
order and direct, on pain of forfeiting a sum not exceeding twenty dollars for every
month they shall fail therein, which shall be levied by the process of the said
court, and applied to the relief and maintenance of such poor person.
If any person shall bring, or cause to be brought, into this commonwealth any
black or colored indented servant, such person, his or her heirs, executors, adminis-
trators and assigns, shall respectively be liable to the guardians or overseers of the
city or district to which such black or colored person shall become chargeable, for
such necessary expenses as such guardians or overseers may be put to for his or
her maintenance, support and interment, together with the costs thereon.’
Every person in whom the ownership or right to the service of any negro or
mulatto slave shall be vested, shall be liable to the overseers of the district in which
(such) negro or mulatto shall become chargeable, or all expenses which such over-
seers may be put to for the maintenance, support and interment of such negro,
or mulatto, with the costs thereon.”
The liability of a surviving mother, if of sufficient ability, for the support of her
minor children, is co-extensive with that of a father.”
Children and grandchildren are on the same footing of liability; each is liable
to the extent of his individual ability.”
This statute does not relieve the township from their liability.” By act 15th April
1857, the courts of quarter sessions are invested with jurisdiction to make orders
and decrees, under the 28th section, either upon the petition of the overseers
of the poor, or of any other person or persons having an interest in the support of
such poor person or persons; and either with or without an order of relief having
1 Act 13 June 1836 3 22. Purd. 1708. ll 7 W. 527-9. 17 Penn. St. 38. 34 Ibid. 231,
26W. & S. 522. 57 Ibid. 495. 58 Ibid. 209.
3 57 Penn. St. 495. 12 13 Ibid. 390.
4 62 [bid. 479, 96 Ibid. 528. See 64 Ibid. 144, 38 15 Ibid. 17. 21 Ibid. 46. '
68 Ibid. 386. 1418. & R. 387. See 2 Chest. Co. R. 310.
5 2 W. 43. 15 Act 13 June 1836 3 25. Purd. 673.
6 5 Binn. 81. 16 Ibid. 326. Purd. 121.
77 W.171. 11 Penn. St. 97. 1 Ibid. 327. Ibid. 1921.
815. & R. 387. 18 62 Penn. St. 472.
9 8 Penn. St. 177. 11 Ibid. 95. 19 13 Luz. L. Reg. 264. 42 Leg. Int. 345.
0258. & BR. 422. 205 W. & S. 536.
796 POOR LAWS.
been first obtained! Upon the petition of the overseers, the court may make an
order for past maintenance? — :
The act of 1836 does not authorize the court of quarter sessions to demand
security ; much jess to commit a defendant for non-compliance with its order ; the
penalty of $20 per month is to be levied by the process of the court.’
VI. DutTiEs oF OVERSEERS.
If any person shall come out of any city or district in this commonwealth, into
any other district, and shall happen to fall sick or die, before he have gained a
settlement therein, so that he cannot be removed, the overseers of such district
shall, as soon as conveniently may be, give notice to the guardians or overseers of
the city or district where such person had last gained a settlement, or to one
of them, of the name, circumstances and condition of such poor person, and if the
guardians or overseers to whom such notice shall be given, shall neglect or refuse
to pay the moneys expended for the use of such poor person, and to take order for
relieving and maintaining him, or in case of his death before such notice could be
given, shall, on request made, neglect or refuse to pay the moneys expended in
maintaining and burying such poor person, in every such ease, it shall be the duty
of the court of quarter sessions of the county where such poor person was last set-
tled, upon complaint to them made, to compel payment by such guardians or over-
seers, of all such sums of money as were necessarily expended for such purpose,
in the manner directed by law, in the case of a judgment obtained against over-
seers.*
it shall be lawful for the directors of the poor of any county, and for the over-
seers of any district, as the case may be, in which any person shall have become
chargeable, to sue for and recover any real and personal estate belonging to such
person, and to sell or otherwise dispose of the personal property, and to collect and
receive the rents and profits of the real estate, and to apply the proceeds, or so
much thereof as may be necessary to defray the expenses incurred in the support
and funeral of such person, and if any balance shall remain, the same shall be paid
over to the legal representatives of such person after his death, upon demand made
and security being given to indemnify such directors or overseers from the claims
of all other persons.°
It shall be the duty of the directors of the poor of the several counties in which
poor-houses are or may be erected, once in every year, after the accounts shall have
been audited and settled, to make out a full and correct statement of their receipts
and expenditures for the preceding year, together with a statement of the number
of poor persons supported, specifying their sex, age or infirmity, if any, and of the
profits arising from all farms under their directions; and it shall be the duty of
such directors, annually, in the month of March, to publish such accounts and
statement, at least twice, in two or more newspapers printed in such county, the
expense of which shall be paid out of the county treasury, and forthwith transmit
a copy of such accounts and statement to the governor, to be by him transmitted
to the legislature.®
If any overseer shall neglect or refuse to perform any duty enjoined upon him by
law, and not otherwise provided for, he shall be liable to an indictment for a misde-
meanor, and shall be punished by a fine not exceeding one hundred dollars, at the
discretion of the court, to be recovered by the process thereof.’
All gifts, grants, devises and bequests, hereafter to be made, or any houses,
lands, tenements, rents, goods, chattels, sum or sums of money, not exceeding in
the whole, including all gifts, grants, devises and bequests, heretofore made, the
yearly value of five hundred pounds, to the poor of any borough or township within
1 Pamph. 191. And see 66 Penn. St, 18. 104
Ibid. 437.
2 2 Chest. Co. R. 538,
3 93 Penn. St. 270.
4 Act 13 Juno 1836 3 23. Purd.1703. If a per-
son suddenly fall sick, and after an order for
his relief, die, the township of his legal settlement
is liable for the expenses of his maintenance and
burial. 7 W. 527. The township where a person,
not having any legal settlement in the state, first
becomes disabled by a hurt, is liable for his main-
tenance. 10 W. 360. The remedy given by this
section must be pursued; an action of assumpait
will not lie in the common pleas. 64 Penn. St
144. 66 Ibid. 63. 78 Ibid. 301.
§ Act 13 June 1836 3 33. Purd. 1708.
6 Thid. 234. Purd. 1710.
7 Ibid. ¢ 42. Purd. 1710.
POOR LAWS. 797
this province, or to any other person or persons for their use, by deed, or by the last
will and testament of any person or persons, or otherwise howsoever, shall be good
and available in law, and shall pass with houses, lands, tenements, rents, goods and
chattels, to the overseers of the poor of such borough or township, for the use of
their poor respectively.!
If any action shall be brought against any overseer or other person, who, in his
aid, and by his command, shall do anything concerning his office, he may plead the
general issue, and give this act and any special matter in evidence ; and if the plain-
tiff shall fail in his action, discontinue the same, or become nonsuit, he shall pay
double costs.?
It shall not be lawful for any director of the poor, in any county of this com-
mouwealth where said office exists, to be concerned or personally interested in any
contract fur furnishing supplies for the maintenance of the poor, or for the con- .
struction or improvement of property under their control. Any violation of the
provisions of this act shall be deemed a misdemeanor in office, and upon conviction
thereof, the party or parties so offending shall be fined in a sum not exceeding five
hundred dollars, and shall be adjudged by the court to be removed from office : Pro-
vided, That nothing herein contained shall be construed to prevent such director of
the poor from receiving his lawful compensation while necessarily attending, in his
official character, to any of the duties enjoined upon him by his office.’
It shall be lawful for the directors of the poor of any county, and for the over-
seers of any district, as the case may be, to make leases for a term. of years of the
real estate of any pauper, and receive the rents, issues and profits thereof, and apply
the proceeds, or so much thereof as may be necessary, to defray the expenses
incurred in the support and funeral of such pauper, and the balance or residue
thereof shall be paid to the legal representatives of such pauper, after his or her
death, upon indemnity being made to such directors or overseers to secure them
from the claims of all other persons ; and after the payment of the claims of such
directors or overseers, the rents, issues and profits arising under such lease shall
be payable to the legal representatives of such pauper.*
VII. FINES AND PENALTIES.
It shall be the duty of every justice who shall, by virtue of any law of this com-
monwealth, receive any fine, penalty or forfeiture appropriated by law for the use of
the poor, forthwith to enter at length on his docket, the name of the person con-
victed, the offence committed, the amount of such fine, penalty or forfeiture, and the
time when the same was paid, and forthwith to deliver a correct transcript of such
entry to a constable of the township, and such justice shall, on demand, pay over
the same to the overseers of the poor lawfully entitled thereto, and shall, annually,
if required, exhibit his docket to the inspection of the township auditors®
If any justice shall wilfully neglect or refuse to perform the duties enjoined on
him as aforesaid, touching any fine, penalty or forfeiture appropriated to the use of
the poor, he shall, on conviction thereof, in the court of quarter sessions of the proper
county, be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor in office, and fined, for the use of the
poor of the township in which he shall reside, any sum not exceeding twenty dollars ;
aud if he shall be convicted of neglecting or refusing to pay over, on demand, to the
proper overseers, any money which he shall have received as aforesaid, he shall be
' fined, over and above the last-mentioned sum, any sum not exceeding double the
amount which he shall have received as aforesaid, which sums shall be recovered
by process of said court.
It shall be’ the duty of the overseers of every district to demand from every jus-
tice the amount of any fine, penalty or forfeiture that may have been received by
him for the use of the poor, and if the same be not paid to them within twenty days,
to proceed to recover the same by suit against such justice, in the manner that debts
of the like amount are or may be by law recoverable.”
It shall be the duty of the clerk of every court by whom any fine shall be im.
1 Act 9 March 1771 3.15. Purd 1708. 5 Act 13 June 1835 335. Purd. 1710.
2 Tbid. 2 33. Purd. 1710. 6 Thid. 5 36.
3 Act 15 May 187491. Ibid. T Ibid. 2 37.
4 Act 4 April 187741. Purd. 1708. The 2d
-section validates prior leases.
798 POOR LAWS.
posed, which by law is to be appropriated, in whole or in part, to the use of the
poor, forthwith to deliver a written notice of the same to a constable living in or
near the township in which the person fined resides, for which service such clerk
shall receive the sum of twenty-five cents from the proper overseers, and no more.}
It shall be the duty of the constable to whom any transcript or certificate shall
be delivered by a justice of the peace or clerk of the court as aforesaid, under a
penalty of ten dollars, to be recovered before any other justice of the proper county,
to deliver such transcript or certificate to one of the overseers of the district to
which such fine, penalty or forfeiture belongs, and for such service such constable
shall be entitled to receive from such overseers the sum of twenty-five cents, and no
more.”
It shall be the duty of every sheriff who shall have received any fine, penalty or
forfeiture which by law may be appropriated to the use of the poor, to pay the same,
on demand, to the proper overseers, and if he shall fail to do so within ten days after
demand, he shall, on conviction thereof in the court of quarter sessions of the
proper county, be fined and pay to the use of the poor of the proper district any
sum not exceeding double the amount received by him, to be recovered by the pro-
cess of the said court.®
In all cases where there are no poor persons supported at the expense of a dis-
trict, or where there shall remain in the hands of the overseers, at the end of the
year, an unexpended balance, arising from fines, penalties or forfeitures received
for the use of the poor, it shall be the duty of the overseers to pay all such fines,
penalties and forfeitures as may have been received by them, and such unex-
pended balaace, to the supervisors of the highways, to be applied to the repairs of
the public roads in such district, unless the township auditors shall judge it ne-
cessary that the whole or part thereof should be retained as a fund for the use of
the poor.*
The several fines, forfeitures and penalties, and other sums of money imposed or
directed to be paid by this act, and not herein directed to be otherwise recovered,
shall be levied and recovered by distress and sale of the goods and chattels of the
delinquent or offender, by warrant, under the hand and seal of any one magistrate
of the city or county where such delinquent or offender dwells, or where such goods
and chattels may be found, and after satisfaction made of such fines, forfeitures and
penalties and sums of money, together with the legal charges, on the recovery
thereof, the overplus, if any, shall be returned to the owner of such goods and
chattels, his executors or administrators.®
If any person shall be aggrieved by the judgment of any one or more magis-
trates, in pursuance of this act, he may appeal to the next court of quarter sessions
for the county in which such magistrates reside (except in cases hereinbefore
specially provided for), whose decision in all such cases shall be final and con-
clusive.®
IX. Forms oF oRDERS.
MERCER COUNTY, ss.
To the overseers of the poor of the district of ——, in county of Mercer:
Wuereas, complaint hath been made unto us, two of the justices of the peace in and
for the said county of Mercer, by ——, of aforesaid, Esquire, that a certain ——, on
the tenth day of May, instant, came to the complainant’s house, in —— aforesaid, and
there fell dangerously ill, and that the said —— is a poor and impotent person, and
unable to provide for herself, and hath not gained a settlement in the said district. These
are, therefore, to authorize and require you to receive the said forthwith into your
care, and make suitable provision for her until she can be removed to the place of her
last legal settlement. Given under our hands and seals, at —— aforesaid, the 12th day of
May, a. v. 1880. E. F., Justice of the Peace. [szau.
G. H., Justice of the Peace. [szan.
MERCER COUNTY, ss.
To the overseers of the poor of the district of —~, in the county of Mercer, greeting :
Wuereas, information had been given unto the subscribers, two of the justices of the
peace in and for the county aforesaid, a —— of the said township, farmer, that ——, of
the same township, laborer, was yesterday, being the 13th day of March, instant, thrown
1 Act 13 June 1836 3 38. Purd. 1711. * Aot 13 June 3 41. Purd, 1711.
3 Ibid. 2 39. 5 Tbid. 2 43.
8 Ibid. 2 40. 6 Ibid. 2 44,
POOR LAWS. 799
from a horse and so much hurt that his life was despaired of, and that the said —— is so
poor as to be unable to prucure the necessary assistance. You are, therefore, hereby
authorized and required to take charge of the said ——, if you find his circumstances to
be as represented, and furnish him such medical and other relief as his distressed situa-
tion may call for, charging your expenses herein in your account against the said district.
Given under our hands and seals, the 14th day of March 1880,
E. F., Justice of the Peace. [sBaL.
G. H., Justice of the Peace. ae
SUMMONS FOR A DELINQUENT OVERSEER.
LUZERNE COUNTY, ss.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To the Constable of B., in the county of Luzerne, greeting:
Wuaerzas, information hath been made before J. R. and B. Y., Esquires, two of our
justices of the peace in and for the county of Luzerne, by J. W., of the borough of L.,
in the said county, blacksmith (one of the overseers of the poor of the said borough),
that J. D., of L. aforesaid, saddler, on the twenty-fifth day of March last past, at L.
aforesaid, being duly appointed overseer of the poor of the said borough, did neglect or
refuse to take upon him the said office [or refuses to perform a certain duty which by law
he was bound to perform], contrary to the act of general assembly in such case made
and provided: You are, therefore, hereby commanded to summon the said J. D. to appear
before our said justices, at the office of the said J. R., at L. aforesaid, on Friday, the
eleventh day of April, instant, at ten o’clock in the forenoon of that day, then and there
to answer to the said information. And be you then there. Hereof fail not. Witness
the said J. R. and B. Q. at L. aforesaid, the fifth day of April, in the year of our Lord
one thousand eight hundred and eighty. J.B. [sean.
B. Q. pe]
FORM OF CONVICTION IN SUCH CASES.
LUZERNE COUNTY, ss.
Bes it remembered, that on the fifth day of April, in the year of our Lord one thousand
eight hundred and eighty, at the borough of L., in the county of Luzerne, J. W., of L.
aforesaid, blacksmith (one of the overseers of the poor of the said borough), cometh
before us, J. R. and B. Q., Esquires, two of the justices of the commonwealth of Penn-
sylvania, assigned to keep the peace of the said commonwealth, in and for the county of
L., and then and there giveth us to understand and be informed that J. D., of L. atore-
said, saddler, on the twenty-fifth day of March last past, at L. aforesaid, being duly
appointed overseer of the poor of the said borough, did neglect or refuse to take upon him
the said office, contrary to the act of general assembly in such case made and provided,
{or refused to perform certain duties which by law he was bound to perform]. And
afterwards, upon the eleventh day of April, in the year aforesaid, at L. aforesaid, the said
J. D. having heen previously summoned, in pursuance of our summons issued for that
purpose, to appear before us the said justices, upon the said eleventh day of April, at ten
of the clock in the forenoon of that day, at the office of the said J. R., at L. aforesaid,
to answer the matter of complaint contained in the said information, he the said J. D.
appears before us the said justices, to answer and make defence to the matters contained
in the said information, and having heard the same, the said J. D. is asked by us the said
justices if he can say anything for himself why he should not be convicted of the pre-
mises above charged upon him in form aforesaid. And because the said J. D. hath
nothing to say, nor can say anything in his own defence touching and concerning the pre-
mises aforesaid, but doth freely and voluntarily acknowledge and confess all and singular
the said premises to be true in manner and form, as the same are charged upon him
in the said information ; and because all and singular the premises being heard and
fully understood by us the said justices, it manifestly appears to us the said justices that
the said J. D. is guilty of the premises charged upon him by the said information ; It is
therefore considered and adjudged by us the said justices, that the said J. D., according
to the form of the act of general assembly aforesaid, be convicted, and he is accordingly
convicted of the offence charged upon him by the said information. And we do hereby
adjudge that the said J. D., for the said offence, hath forfeited the sum of twenty dollars,
to be appropriated as the act of the general assembly directs. In witness whereof, we,
the said justices to this present record of conviction as aforesaid, have set our hands and
seals, at L. aforesaid, the 11th day of April in the year of our Lord one thousand eight
hundred and eighty. a e eee
.Q. [sEaL.
[ 800 ]
Principal and Agent.
Tue relation of principal and agent takes place, whenever one person authorizes
another to do acts or make engagements in his name.’ :
A hired agent is bound to possess such a degree of skill as would, in general, be
adequate to the service; a gratuitous agent is not bound to possess such skill, but
is only liable by proof of gross negligence, or of having omitted to use that skill
which, from his situation, office or profession, he cannot but be supposed to have.?
If a man promises as an agent, he is not personally bound.’
The acts of a servant bind his master only when done in the course of the busi-
ness committed to him, or within the scope of an authority specially delegated to
him. A promissory note, signed by a clerk in a store, for his employer, does not
bind the latter, without proof of special authority.*
Tf an agent exceed his authority in making a contract, he thereby binds himself
individually, but his principal is not bound.’
A party who wishes to avail himself of the acts of an agent, must, in order to
charge the principal, prove the authority under which the agent acted.* An agent
specially employed to receive the amount of an account, or take a note for it, has no
authority to dispose of the note, when taken ; he cannot depart from his authority.
So also, an agent employed to make sales on credit is not authorized subsequently
to collect the price in the name of his principal.®
The authority of a general agent to contract so as to bind his principal, is only
limited to the usual and ordinary means of accomplishing the business intrusted to
him.® If the agent do an act within the scope of his authority, and at the same
time do something more which he was not authorized to do, and the two matters
be not so connected as to be inseparable, even though both may relate to the same
subject ; that which he had authority to do is alone binding, and the other is void.”
Parties who have entered into a contract with one, as the agent of others, are
estopped from contesting the agent’s authority to bind his principal." The acts of
an agent or an attorney, after the death of his principal, of which he was ignorant,
are binding upon the parties.”
Whenever confidence is reposed, the law forbids that it shall be abused.’ It is
a rule of law which does not admit of dispute, that an agent is bound to keep his
principal informed of all material occurrences in the agency; if he fail to do so, it
is negligence, and a palpable violation of duty, for which the factor is clearly liable
to a suit.
An agent appointed to collect money, who buys a note of his principal, at a dis-
count, cannot retain the nominal amount of the note out of tlre money collected; he
can set off only the amount which he actually paid.* Where an agent (as an attor-
ney) rightfully receives money for his principal, which ought to be paid over by
the principal to a third person, such third person cannot maintain an action against
the agent for its recovery; he is liable to account only to his principal.
Declarations made by an agent, at the time of paying money, showing on whose
account and behalf the money was paid, are admissible as part of the res geste."
Admissions by an agent, when he is about the doing of some act within the scope
of his delegated authority, are evidence against the principal; but naked declara-
tions which are not part of any res gestx, are not admissible.®
On the hiring of an agent for a year, the principal is liable to him for the wages
of the year, if he dismiss the agent before its termination.
1 Paley on Agency 1. 1 30 Penn. St. 84,
2 Lbid. 72 124 W. & S. 282.
8 Add. 140, 187 W. 387.
4W. 222. 4B. 291. 44K, 229, 4 W.& 8.305. 6 Ibi F
© 1W. GS. 222. 4 Clark 87. 10 W.N. 0.493. 19 2 P.& W. 525, penetewer
6 28 Penn. St. 505. 16 1 Am. L. Rog. 30.
17 W. 524. 17 4 Whart. 130. 1 Greenl. Evid.
8 30 Ponn. St. 513. 18 25 Penn, St. 393. eae
9 31 Ibid. 461. 195 W.& 8. 210.
=
© 2 Greenl. Evid. 159.
.
PRIVILEGE. 801
Whenever a person acts as agent for the public, he is not personally liable for
contracts made by him in that capacity. Nor will it make any difference if the
services, &c., were performed at the special instance and request of the person so
acting as agent.!
A public agent of government, contracting for the use of the government, is not,
po liable, although the contract be under his seal? A public agent, though
nown to be such, is personally liable in his contract for things for the use of the
government, unless he make it in his official capacity, and the party contracted with
appears to have looked to government alone for compensation.
Privilege,
I. Of the privileges of suitors and witnesses. III. Of the privileges of foreign ministers.
Il. Of the privileges of freeholders. IV. Of the privileges of other persons.
I. OF SUITORS AND WITNESSES.
PRIVILEGE is an exemption from some duty, burden or attendance, to which
certain persons are entitled, from a supposition of law that the stations they fill, or
the offices they are engaged in, are such as to require all their care, and that, there-
fore, without this indulgence, it would be impracticable to execute such offices to
that advantage which the public good requires.‘
A party attending in court is privileged from the service of a summons, as well
as from an arrest.© A suitor, who was served with a summons after the lapse of a
day from the delivery of the verdict, on his motion, was discharged from the action.®
But there is no privilege from the service of a subpoena."
A witness attending before a magistrate, for the purpose of having his deposition
taken, under a rule of court, is privileged from arrest, eundo, morando et redeundo
[whilst going, remaining and returning].*
The privilege of a suitor does not hold, when he has been surrendered by his bail
in another case, and is in actual custody at the time of arrest.? The privilege of a
witness from arrest does not extend throughout the term at which the cause was
marked for trial, nor will it protect him while the witness is engaged in transacting
private business, after he is discharged from the obligation of the subpena.!°
A suitor in a court of one county, who comes into another county to attend to
the taking of a deposition in the pending suit, in pursuance of its rules, is privi-
leged from the service of a summons in the latter county, although in consequence
of circumstances happening after his coming into the county, the deposition has not
been taken."
A refusal to discharge a defendant, on the ground of his having been arrested
while attending as a party or witness, is a matter of discretion with the court below,
the propriety of which cannot be reviewed in the supreme court.”
Where a person is a suitor in one court, and, while so, is served with process
issued by another, the general practice is, that the party must apply to the court,
in which he is suitor, to be discharged from the process issued by the other.
Either court may, however, discharge the party and give him the benefit of his
privilege, but the court from which the process issues will not exercise the power
of discharging the party, except under special circumstances.'*
The protection given to suitors and witnesses is now extended to every case where
the attendance is a duty, in conducting any proceedings of a judicial nature.’* The
privilege from arrest, however, is confined to parties in civil proceedings, unless it
appear, that the arrest on the criminal charge was a contrivance to get the defendant
into custody on the civil suit.
1 1 Mass. 208, 62 Penn. St. 301. 9 3 Y. 387.
2 1 Cr. 343. 10 4 Dall. 329. 1 Green]. Evid. 2 316.
5 3 Caines 69. 1Mz 237.
4 Bac. Abr. 12 5 Whart. 343.
5 1 Binn. 77. 1 Chest. Co. R. 443. 139M. 200. 4 Clark 49. 3 Am. L. J. 134. 1
6 2 Y. 222. Greenl. Evid. 3 316.
7 4 Dall. 341. 498. &R. 151.
—— ~ 10 Wend. 636. 1 Ad. & H.378,
802 PRIVILEGE.
II. FREEHOLDERS.
The privilege of freeholders to be sued by summons, extends to actions of trespass
vi et armis.' But if a freeholder unite in a joint and several bond, or commit a joint
trespass with one who is not a freeholder, he may be arrested upon a joint capias
issued against both.?
A judgment obtained before a justice of the peace is sufficient ground to defeat
the privilege of a freeholder.®
The court will abate a capias which has been issued against a freeholder, although
the value of his freehold be less than the amount of the plaintiff's demand, if no
incumbrance exist on his land at the time the writ issued.*
Ifa defendant freeholder, who seeks to avail himself of the privilege arising from
his freehold, neglects to suggest it, it would justify the issuing of an execution
against him ; but on the payment of costs accrued on the execution, the magistrate
should supersede it, and give the defendant the privilege secured by law.°
A freeholder is an inhabitant in any part of this province, who hath resided
therein for the space of two years, and has jifty acres of land, or more, in fee-
simple, well seated, and twelve acres thereof, or more, well cleared or improved, or
hath a dwelling-house worth fifty pounds current money of America, in some city
or township within this province, clear estate, or hath unimproved land to the value
of fifty pounds like money.®
The second section of the act of 14th April 1838, relating to the commencement
of actions, &c., revived the act of 20th March 1725, which exempted freeholders,
in certain cases, from arrest."
III. FoREIGN MINISTERS AND CONSULS.
An ambassador or foreign minister is not amenable to the laws of the nation to
which he is sent. The recognition by the president of a foreign minister is con-
clusive upon the judiciary.2 A secretary of legation is entitled to all the immunities
of a minister, and is privileged against any prosecution civil or criminal; an
attaché to a foreign legation is a public minister within the statute of 1790.
A foreign minister cannot waive his privilege or immunities, and his submission
or consent to an arrest is no justification.”
The chargé d’affatres of a foreign government, whose official functions in that
capacity ceased on the arrival of the minister of his government, but who was
delayed in this country by circumstances, was held not to be amenable to process
in a civil suit.”
A foreign consul is not privileged from prosecution for a misdemeanor, by virtue
of his consular appointment. And it seems, that a consul-general is not protected
by the law of nations, from a prosecution and indictment for a rape. But the state
courts have no jurisdiction in such case, the exclusive jurisdiction being vested in
the courts of the United States,"
A person appointed to represent the United States abroad, in a diplomatic
capacity, is not privileged from the service of a summons here.’
IV. OTHER PERSONS.
A member of assembly is privileged from arrest, summons, citation or other civil
process, during his attendance on the public business confided to him.s So, a
member, whilst visiting his home, on temporary leave of absence, during the ses-
sion of the legislature, is privileged from the service of process in a civil suit.?
But a member of assembly is not privileged from arrest, for the crime of embezzle-
ment, during the session.'®
1 1 Dall. 310. 29 Leg. Int, 324, 1 1 W. 0. G. 282.
22 Bro. 135, 18 W.N.0.193. 65 Penn. St. 1 Bald. 240.
86. And see 1 Dall. 305 n. 12-4 Dall. 821.
8 1 Dall. 436. And see 3 Am. L. J. 522. 18 2 Ibid, 299 n.
: 18. & i . . 58. & R. 545,
1 Ash. 407. 2 Chest. Co. R. 469. 21 How. Pr,
6 Purd 66. 18 4 Dall. 107. And see 2 Clark 450 foe
71 Clark 18. 1713 W. N. 0. 59, ,
8 1N. & McC. 217. 18 4 Ibid. 540.
94 W.C.C. 153.
PRIZE-FIGHTING.—PROOCESS. 803
A member of a state convention is privileged from a swmmons or arrest during
the sitting of the convention, and for a reasonable period before and after the
session.
An attorney at law is not privileged in Pennsylvania from arrest on a capias.?
The claim of privilege must be made at a proper time; after judgment obtained
it is too late.’
——=—
Yrize- Fiqhting.
Act 22 Maron 1867. Purd. 530.
Whosoever shall engage or participate in any prize-fight, within this common-
wealth, or any fight or pugilistic contest, on the result of which any money or
valuable thing is bet or wagered, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and on con-
viction thereof, shall be fined in a sum not exceeding one thousand dollars, and
imprisoned in the penitentiary or the jail of the proper county, for a period not
exceeding two years; and every person being present at such fight, or laying any
bet or wager on the result thereot, whether present or not, shall be considered a
participant therein, and as giving encouragement thereto, and may, at the discre-
tion of the court, be punished in like manner.*
In the counties of Erie, Luzerne, Montgomery, Pike and Schuylkill, the sheriff
is authorized by the act 16 March 1866, to summon the posse comitatus, to prevent
a prize-fight. And every able-bodied man, between the age of 18 and 45, who
shall not attend, when summoned for that purpose, is declared guilty of a misde-
meanor, punishable by a fine of $100, or in default of payment, six months’
imprisonment in the county jail.®
Et
qJrocess,
I. Provisions of the Penal Code. Il. Judicial decisions and authorities.
I, Act 31 Marc# 1860. Purd., 503.
Sxor. 7. If any sheriff, coroner or keeper of a jail, constable or other officer,
shall wilfully and without reasonable cause, refuse to execute any lawful process
directed to him, requiring the apprehension or confinement of any person charged
with, or convicted of, a criminal offence; or shall wilfully and without reasonable
cause, omit to execute such process, by which such person shall escape ; he shall
be guilty of a misdemeanor, and, on conviction, be sentenced to an imprisonment
not exceeding two years, and a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars. :
Secr. 8. If any person shall, knowingly, wilfully and forcibly, obstruct, resist or
oppose any sheriff, coroner or other officer of the commonwealth, or other person
duly authorized, in serving or attempting to serve or execute any process or order
of any court, judge, justice or arbitrator, or any other legal process whatsoever ; or
shall assault or beat any sheriff, coroner, constable or other officer or person, duly
-authorized, in serving or executing any process or order as aforesaid, or for and
because of having served or executed the same; or if any person shall rescue
another in legal custody; or if any person being required by any sheriff, coroner,
constable or other officer of the commonwealth, shall neglect or refuse to assist
him in the execution of his office in any criminal case, or in the preservation of the
peace, or in apprehending and securing any person for a breach of the peace ;
such person shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and, on conviction, be sentenced to an
imprisonment not exceeding one year, and to pay a fine not exceeding one hundred
dollars, or either, or both, in the discretion of the court.°
"1 Dall. 296. 4See40.& P.537, Car.& M.314. 16 W.N.
21 Y. 350. C, 15, and note.
3.4 Dall. 107. 5 Purd. 530.
804 PROCESS.
II. Blackstone considers process, in civil cases, as the means of compelling the
defendant to appear in court. This is sometimes called original process, being
founded upon the original writ; and also to distinguish it from mesne or interme-
diate process, which issues, pending the first, upon some collateral or interlocutory
matter ; as to summon juries, witnesses and the like.! Mesne process is sometimes
put in contradistinction to final process, or process of execution ; and then it signi
fies all such process as intervenes between the beginning and end of a suit.?
Though process issued by a justice may be altered by his direction, yet a general
authority by him to a constable or any other person, to alter dates or to fill up or
alter process, is not only imprudent and indiscreet, but void.* Proceedings of a
justice, in an action of debt, were set aside, because the summons stated no day of
appearance.t The judgment of a justice was reversed ; first, because the summons
was made returnable on the next day ; second, because the summons was to answer
a debt under 40s., and the judgment was for a greater sum®
A warrant by a justice, not directed to any particular person in office, is bad.
But a warrant, directed to ————, constable, is good, if executed by the constable
of the district.’
In criminal cases, a justice is not bound to issue his warrant whenever it is
applied for; he is to use a legal discretion, and determine, on a mature deliberation
of all the circumstances, whether a warrant should issue.®
A justice who backs a warrant should be satisfied, by oath, that it is the hand-
writing of the justice mentioned in the warrant.®
The warrant of a justice is not returnable at any particular time, but continues
in force so long as the justice shall live. A warrant,shall be issued (if a criminal
warrant) on oath, &., and name or describe the individual to be arrested; other-
wise it is unconstitutional, and the officer cannot justify an arrest under it.™
The word ‘ process” in the 23d sect. of the 5th article of the constitution of
Pennsylvania, which provides that the style of all process shall be The Common-
wealth of Pennsylvania, was intended to refer to such writs only as should become
necessary to be issued in the course of the exercise of that judicial power, which is
established and provided for in the article of the constitution, and forms exclusively
the subject-matter of it.?
The provision in the 23d sect. of the 5th article of the constitution of Pennsyl-
‘vania, that “all prosecutions shall be carried on in the name and by the authority
of the commonwealth of Pennsylvania,” and conclude, “against the peace and
dignity of the same,” has never been considered as extending to prosecutions other
than those carried on by indictment, found in some of the courts referred to in the
‘said 5th article, and where, anterior to the Revolution, it was the rule and practice
to conclude such prosecutions against the peace, &c., of the king.’
A justice of the peace may authorize any citizen to execute a warrant of arrest
‘in a criminal case; but no private person, and no other than the constable of the
place where it is to be executed, can be compelled to execute it.
The offence of obstructing process, consists in refusing to give up possession, or
in opposing or obstructing the execution of the writ, by threats of violence, which
it is in the power of the party to enforce.!® And if the defendant resist the execu-
tion of process for his arrest, by refusing to accompany the officer, it is not neces-
sary, to complete the offence, that he should use or threaten violence.!® Any
obstruction to the free action of the officer, or his lawful assistants, wilfully
placed in his or their way, for the purpose of thus obstructing him or them, is
sufficient.”
1 Finch 436. 10 Peake N. P. 234,
2 2 BI Com. 19. 1 3 Binn. 43,
10 Johns. 245, 123 ~P. & W. 99.
4 Add. 272. 18 Thid. See5 8. &R. 463. 1 @r. 262-
8 1 Dall. 405, M4 1 Ash. 183. ui
® Add. 376. 1 2 W.C. 0. 169.
1 6 Bion, 124, 16 3 Ibid. 335.
8 1Y. 74, IT 2 Curt, C. C. 639.
9 Purd, 545.
[ 805 j
Wrofaneness,
I. Punishment of blasphemy. III. Judicial decisions.
II. Penalty for profane swearing.
I. Aor 31 Maron 1860. Purd. 479.
Sxor. 30. If any person shall, wilfully, premeditatedly and despitefully, blaspheme,
or speak loosely and profanely of Almighty God, Christ Jesus, the Holy Spirit, or
the Scriptures of Truth, such person, on conviction thereof, shall be sentenced to
pay a fine not exceeding one hundred dollars, and undergo an imprisonment not
exceeding three months, or either, at the discretion of the court.
II. Act 22 Aprit 1794. Purd. 530.
Sect. 3. If any person of the age of sixteen years or upwards, shall profanely
curse or swear by the name of God, Christ Jesus, or the Holy Ghost, every person
so offending, being thereof convicted, shall forfeit and pay the sum of sixty-seven
cents for every such profane curse or oath ; and in case he or she shall refuse or
neglect to pay the said forfeiture, or goods and chattels cannot be found whereof
to levy the same by distress, he or she shall be committed to the house of correc-
tion of the proper county, not exceeding twenty-four hours, for every such offence
of which such person shall be convicted ; and whosoever, of the age’ of sixteen
years or upwards, shall curse or swear by any other name or thing than as afore-
said, and shall be convicted thereof, shall forfeit and pay the sum of forty cents
‘for every such curse or oath ; and in case such offender shall neglect or refuse to
satisfy such forfeiture, or no goods or chattels can be found whereof to levy the same
by distress, he or she shall be committed to the house of correction of the proper
county, not exceeding twelve hours for every such offence.
Secr. 4. The justices of the supreme court, severally, throughout this state, every
president of the court of common pleas within his district, every associate judge of
the courts of common pleas, and every justice of the peace within his county, the
mayor and aldermen (magistrates) of the city of Philadelphia, and each of them, within
the limits of said city, and each burgess of a town corporate, within his borough are
hereby empowered and authorized, and required to proceed against and punish all
persons offending against this act; and every persoa who shall profane the Lord’s
day, or who shall profanely curse or swear, or who shall intoxicate him or herself,
as mentioned in the next preceding section of this act; and for that purpose each
of the said justices or magistrates, severally, may and shall convict such offenders,
upon his own view and hearing, or shall issue, if need be, a warrant, summons or
capias (according to the circumstances of the case), to bring the body of the person
accused as aforesaid, before him; and the same justices and magistrates respect
ively, shall, in a summary way, inquire into the truth of the accusation, and upon
the testimony of one or more credible witnesses, or the confession of the party,
shall convict the person who shall be guilty as aforesaid, and thereupon shall pro-
ceed to pronounce the forfeiture incurred by the person so convicted, as hereinbefore
directed ; and if. the person so convicted refuse or neglect to satisfy such forfeiture,
immediately, with costs, or produce goods and chattels whereon to levy the said
forfeiture, together with costs, then the said justices or magistrates shall commit the
offender, without bail or mainprise, to the house of correction of the county wherein
the offence shall be committed, during such time as is hereinbefore directed; there
to be fed upon bread and water only, and to be kept at hard labor; and if such
commitment shall be in any county wherein ao district house of correction hath
been erected, then the offender shall be committed to the common jail of the county,
to be therein fed and kept at hard labor, as aforesaid ; and every such conviction
may be in the following terms, viz. :
806 PROFANENESS.
Be it remembered, that on the —— day of ——, in the year of —,A.B., of rare
county, laborer (or otherwise, as his or her rank, occupation or calling may be), is con-
victed before me, being one of the justices of the (or one of the aldermen or bur-
gesses of the city or borough of ——, in the county of ), of swearing profane
oaths, by the name of —— (or otherwise, as the offence and case may be), and I do
adjudge him (or her) to forfeit for the same, the sum of —— cents. Given under my
hand and seal, the day and year aforesaid.
Provided always, That every such prosecution shall be commenced within seventy-
two hours after the offence shall have been committed. :
Szor. 12. One moiety of the forfeitures in money, accruing and becoming due
for any offence against this act, shall be paid to the overseers of the poor of the
city, borough or township wherein the offence shall be committed, for the use of
the poor thereof; and the other moiety to the person or persons who shall prose-
cute and sue for the same; and the inhabitants of such city or other place, shall,
notwithstanding, be admitted witnesses to testify against any person who shall be
prosecuted for any offence by virtue of this act.
III. Christianity is part of the law of Pennsylvania, and maliciously to revile it
is an indictable offence; but fairly and conscientiously to promulgate religious
opinions is not criminal. In an indictment under that act it is necessary that the
words should be laid to have been spoken profanely ; it seems also, that the defend-
ant should state the very words spoken, and that it is not sufficient to state that the
defendant spoke in substance, &c.'
The form of conviction, given by the 4th section of the act of 22d April 1794,
for the prevention of vice and immorality, is directory merely, and under that act
the justice is not bound to send up the evidence given before him.?
In a summary conviction under the 2d section of the act of 22d April 1794, for
profane swearing, the judgment must ascertain not only the amount of fine inflicted,
but also the alternative duration of imprisonment ; and if it do not the proceedings
are void, and the defendant cannot be held in prison. Several offences may be
contained in one conviction.‘
A summary conviction must agree with, and cannot exceed the charge in the
information: therefore, where the information charged the defendant with swearing
twenty-five oaths, and the conviction and penalty was for twenty-nine oaths, the
proceedings were reversed on certiorari.§
1115. & R. 394. 4 2 Ibid. 49.
2 1 Ash. 410. 5 Ibid.
3 1 Clark 408.
[ 807 ]
Promissory Notes,
I. Definition of a promissory note. V. Of the consideration.
IL. Liability of the maker of a promissory note, VI. Notice of non-payment.
III. Liability of the indorser. VII. Notes payable in specific articles.
IV. Of the negotiability of a note. VIII. Of actions on promissory notes,
I. A PROMISSORY NOTE is defined to be a promise or engagement in writing tc
pay a specified sum at a time therein limited, or on demand, or at sight, to a person
therein named, or his order, or to the bearer. The person who makes the note is
called the maker, and the person to whom it is payable the payee, and the person
to whom he transfers the interest by indorsement the indorsee.!
All the parties to a note are liable for the amount due, although only one satis-
faction can be recovered ; and executions for costs may be issued in all the suits.?
A note signed by more than one person, and beginning, ‘‘I promise,” &c., is
several as well as joint.’
The receipt of a negotiable promissory note operates as an extinguishment of a
prior existing debt, if so intended between the parties; and this is a question of
fact upon the evidence.* But the law raises no implication, from the mere accept-
ance of a promissory note for a pre-existing debt, of an agreement to give time jor
payment of the original debt, until the maturity of the note, so as to operate as a
discharge to a surety ; to have that effect there must be an express binding agree-
ment not to sue until the maturity of the note.®
Whenever any promissory note or other negotiable instrument shall be given, the
consideration for which shall consist in whole or in part of the right to make, use
or vend any patent invention or inventions, claimed to be patented, the words,
“given for a patent-right,’’ shall be prominently and legibly written or printed
on the face of such note or instrument, above the signature thereto; and such
note or instrument, in the hands of any purchaser or holder, shall be subject to
the same defences as in the hands of the original owner or holder.§ *
If any person shall take, sell or transfer any promissory note or other negotiable
instrument, not having the words, “‘ given for a patent-right,” written or printer
legibly and prominently on the face of such note or instrument, above the signature
thereto, knowing the consideration of such note or instrument to consist, in whole
or in part, of the right to make, use or vend any patent invention or inventions
claimed to be patented, every such person or persons shall be deemed guilty of a
misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof, shall be fined in any sum not exceeding
five hundred dollars, or imprisoned in the county jail, not exceeding sixty days, or
both, in the discretion of the court.’
This act is constitutional.2 The patent laws do not confer rights, but only render
those possessed by the inventor exclusive.
The act of 1872 avoids such note, as between the original parties ; and as to one
who discounted it with notice ;” otherwise, if negotiated to a bond fide holder.” The
act does not apply to notes given for the price of patented articles.”
IL. LABILITY OF THE MAKER.
An alteration in the date or amount of a promissory note by the payee, in any
material respect, avoids it, although in the hands of an innocent indorsee, for a valu-
able consideration.“ So will the addition of a particular place of payment ;® but
not the addition of an indorser’s place of residence.*
1 Chit. on Bills 324. 11 93 Penn. St. 373. 11 W. N.C. 173.
22 Dall. 115. 12 86 Penn. St. 173. 11 Phila. 558. 6 W.N.C
8 Byles on Bills 6. 11 Johns. 544. 176.
£ 32 Penn. St. 493. 13 1 W.N. C. 107.
5 39 Ibid. 226, “43 Y. 391. 75.& R. 508. 2 W. 4&8. 438,
6 Act 12 April 1872 3 1. Purd. 1732. 19 Penn. St. 119. 46 Ibid. 259. And see 63
7 Tbid. 2 2. _ Ibid. 327. 68 Ibid. 237.
8 86 Penn. St. 173. But see 2 Flip. 33. 15 35 Penn. St. 80. 46 Ibid. 259.
997 U.S. 501. 16 41 Ibid. 214. And see 61 Ibid. 69.
10 2 Pears. 250.
i
808 PROMISSORY NOTES.
If the indorser of a note sign a general release to the maker, before the ae
becomes due, of all actions, causes of action, and demands, which he then had, or might
in future have against the maker, by reason of any act, matter, cause or thing, prior
to the date of the release, he cannot, if he pay the note afterwards, maintain an
action against the maker.! a
A bond from a third person is no discharge of the maker or indorser of a note
unless it be so agreed. Nor will the forbearance to sue the maker, nor delay to sue
the indorser, discharge the latter, provided the time was not given until after the
note was protested,? .
If a note be made and indorsed for the accommodation of the indorser, and a
bond of indemnity be given by the indorser to the maker, the holder does not dis-
charge the maker, by giving time to the indorser, after the day of payment, although
at the time of giving the delay, the holder knew that it was an accommodation
note.
A note given on Sunday is void, and there can be no recovery upon it.
The bond fide holder for value, and without notice, of a negotiable note made to
A. B. or bearer, is entitled to recover on it against the maker, free from all existing
equities between the original parties® :
The indorsee of an accommodation note may recover the whole amount of it from
the maker, although he purchased it from the payee at a greater discount than six
per cent.6 But it is a good defence to an action by an indorsee against the maker
of a promissory note, that it was made for the accommodation of the payee, without
consideration, and negotiated by him when over due.” :
If the maker of a note, payable at a bank, have no funds in the bank when it
falls due, demand of payment is unnecessary.®
An indorsement may be made on the face of the note, or on a separate paper.”
III. LIABILITY OF THE INDORSER.
The indorser of a note is only a security that the maker shall pay the money ; if
the holder be guilty of neglect, or receive part of the money from the maker, and
give time for the rest, the indorser is no longer responsible.’
A demand of payment of the maker, or due diligence in endeavoring to make a
demand, is necessary to charge the indorser." But if the maker has absconded.
and is not to be found when the note falls due, a demand of payment is not neces-
sary in order to charge the indorser; it is not incumbent on the indorser to show
the holder where the maker is to be found.”
Where the maker of a note has removed into another state or jurisdiction, subse-
quently to the making of the note, a personal demand on him is not necessary ; it
is sufficient, if presented at his former residence.¥
The indorser of a note is not discharged by the holder taking a mortgage from
the maker, as security for the debt.’
Where a promissory note is payable at a particular place, as a bank, and the
nolder is at the bank until the usual hour for closing the same, on the day on which
the note falls due, ready to receive payment, no further demand on the maker is
necessary, in order to charge the indorser.®
The holder of a promissory note accepted from the maker a check upon a bank,
drawn by a firm composed of the maker and a third person, for the amount of the
note, payable in six days, which was agreed to be in full satisfaction for the note,
‘Cin case the check was duly honored at its maturity :” held, that the acceptance
of the check suspended the remedy of the holder against the maker, and discharged
the indorser.’8
If one of two payees and indorsers of a note discounted for the accommodation
S. & R. 398, 9 44 Ibid. 89. 5 Phila. 62.
1 Ibid. 179.
Ibid. 229,
0 Penn. St. 138.
6 Ibid. 285. 48 Ibid. 458.
11
aT
59
47 2
5 Thid. 328.
6 3
73
8 33 Ibid. 134, 41 Ibid. 322,
10 1 Dall. 252,
14S. & R. 480.
12 Tbid. 1W. & S. 129.
18 9 Wheat. 598,
47S. & R219,
16 1R. 335. 4 W. & 8. 505,
16 2 Whart. 253,
PROMISSORY NOTES. 809
of the maker, die pefore the note falls due, his representatives are not liable to the
holder for any part of the amount.
The holder of a negotiable note, by agreement with the maker, and for a valuable
consideration, extended the time for its payment, and afterwards indorsed the same
to a third person, without giving notice of such agreement: held, that he was liable
to the indorsee, without demand of payment from the maker, protest cr notice.?
The taking of a new note of equal degree, either from the debtor or from a
stranger, at the instance of the debtor, is not an extinguishment of the first note,
aor will it release any indorser of the same, unless the holder agreed to accept the
new note in satisfaction, or to give time for the payment of the first note?
A delay to sue the maker of a note, after it becomes due, does not discharge the
indorser.‘
The holder of a promissory note, in order to render the indorser liable, must
demand payment of the note from the maker, or, in his absence, from his clerk or
agent, on the last of the days of grace, and give due notice of the non-payment to
the indorser ; a demand on the maker before the last day of grace must pass for
nothing.
An indorsement in blank by the payee of a sealed bill (note) does not make him
liable to the holder.®
An indorsement, on a note, without a date, by one not a party to it, is presumed
to have been made at its date, and the indorser held liable as an original promisor,
and not as a guarantor.”
Where a person indorses an over-due note, he is entitled to notice of demand and
non-payment, as much as if it had been indorsed before maturity. It is the duty
of the indorsee to present such note to the maker for payment, within a reasonable
time, and in case of non-payment, immediately to give notice to the indorser.®
One who indorses a note to which he is not a party, since the act of 1855, is to
be deemed a second indorser and liable as such only?
IV. THE NEGOTIABILITY OF A NOTE.
The negotiability of a note is not impaired by an assignment of it under seal
indorsed, nor by a receipt indorsed of certain goods received on account.”
An action may be maintained in the name of the holder of a note, which is
payable to bearer." ;
In an action against the maker of a note, made “ payable and negotiable” at a
particular bank, it is not necessary to aver or prove that it was negotiated at such
bank; to make such fact important, the instrament must contain words restricting
its negotiability to the place designated.”
A note made in favor of J. W. M., omitting the words “ or order” or ‘‘ bearer,”
and “payable and negotiable, without defalcation, at the Kensington Bank,” is
negotiable only, in the first instance, at the designated place. Not having
been discounted or negotiated at the appointed place, a holder to whom it has been
indorsed, cannot maintain an action upon it in his own name against the makers.”
A certificate of deposit, payable to the depositor, or order, in currency, is not a
negotiable instrument, and the indorsee thereof cannot maintain an action upon it
in his own name; the mere indorsement of such an instrument, is not a legal
assignment of it, such as will enable the indorsee to sue in his own name.
A promissory note, with the addition of a warrant of attorney to confess judg-
ment, is not a negotiable instrument.” So, the insertion in a promissory note of a
clause allowing a commission upon its face, as a collection fee, or case of non-pay-
ment at maturity, destroys its negotiability.* But a note, payable to order, “ with
interest, waiving the right of appeal, and all valuation, appraisement, stay and
exemption laws,” has been held to be negotiable.”
12 Whart. 344. Ibid. 243.
,? 10 W. 111. 10 2 W. 222.
3 9 Ibid. 173. Ui Ibid, 134,
411 Johns. 176. 18 Ibid. 327. 12 26 Penn, St. 257.
5 8W. 401. 2 Whart. 377. 6 W. & 8S. 179. 13 29 Ibid. 529.
6138. &@R. 311. 5 Whart. 325. i: an pee aaa
TAIL . St. 482. Ibid. 460. id. 346. id. ;
s 30 tae om 16 84 Ibid. 407. 92 Ibid. 227. 4 W.N. C. 441.
9 A8 Ibid. 113. 59 Ibid. 144. 60 Ibid. 35. 68 17 67 Penn. St.421. 75 Ibid. 188.
810 PROMISSORY NOTES.
All bills of exchange, drafts, orders, checks, promissory notes or other instru-
ments in the form, nature or similitude thereof, that shall or may hereafter be made
or be drawn or indorsed to order, within this commonwealth, upon any person or
persons, body politic or corporate, copartership, firm or institution of or in, or that
shall be made payable in any other state, territory, country or place whatsoever, for
any sum or sums of money, with the current rate of exchange in Philadelphia, or
such other place within this commonwealth where the same may bear date, or in
current funds, or such like qualifications superadded, shall be held to be negotiable
by indorsement and recoverable by the indorsee or indorsees in his, her or their
own name or names, in the same manner, to all intents and purposes, as bills of
exchange and promissory notes, formally drawn and ordinarily in use, and negotiable
within this commonwealth, are now by law recoverable therein.’
V. ConsIDERATION.
The consideration of a promissory note may be inquired into as between the
original parties, and if there be no consideration for the promise, it cannot be
enforced by an action.? : :
When a promissory note-is assigned for a valuable consideration, and in the
course of business, the assignee cannot be affected by any transactions between
the assignor and the parties to such note, to which the assignee is not privy, and
evidence to that effect is not relevant. But such evidence is relevant, if it show that
the assignee was a trustee, or had notice of the transactions, or did not receive the
note in the usual course of business.
As between the payer and payee of a negotiable note, either want or failure of
consideration may be set up as a defence to an action upon it. So also as between
the payer and a holder claiming by indorsement or delivery made after the note
becomes due.*
If the payer of a note stand by and see it assigned to a third person without
giving the assignee notice of an existing defence, he shall afterwards pay the amount
of the note to the assignee, although the consideration thereof should have entirely
failed, and whether his conduct proceed from ignorance or design.
The act of 1797 was intended only to place notes, bearing date in the city or
county of Philadelphia, on an equal footing with notes in other parts of the com-
mercial world, but not to give holder of a note the right to receive the whole that
appears due on the face of it, under all circumstances.6 The consideration of a
note payable ‘‘ without defaleation,” cannot be inquired into in an action of a bond
Jide holder against the maker, though the note be not dated in the city or county
of Philadelphia, nor discounted by a bank, nor deposited in a bank for collection.”
In an action by the holder against the indorser of a promissory note, it is com-
petent for the defendant to prove that the note was put into circulation by the
maker fraudulently and without his knowledge. In which case he may call upon
the plaintiff to show how he came by it, and what he gave for it.®
The words “without defalcation,”’ in a single bill or note under seal, do not
preclude the obligee from showing a failure of consideration, in an action by an
assignee?
If an indorsee take a note heedlessly, and under circumstances which ought to
have excited the suspicions of a prudent and careful man, the maker or indorser
may be let into his defence; much more if there be ground to suspect a secret
understanding between an indorser and his indorsee, that the latter should be trustee
for the former.° An advertisement in a newspaper by the maker of a note, caution:
ing the public against taking it, and stating that he had a legal and just defenco, is
not evidence to charge an indorsee with notice, although it appear that the latter
was a subscriber to the paper, that it was duly sent to him, and that no complaint
was made of its not being received." The rule undoubtedly is, both here and in
1 Act 5. April 1849 2 11. Purd. 1732. 61S. & R. 180.
217 Johns. 301. 3 P. & W. 284. 65 Penn. St. 7 9 Ibid. 193. See 8 Ibid. 481.
59. 8 5 Binn. 469
868. & R. 537. 7 W. 328 92P. & W. 245
47 W. 130. 10 3 W. 25,
51P.& W.476 Nl Thid. 20,
PROMISSORY NOTES. 811
England, that where negotiable paper has been stolen or lost, or obtained by duress,
or procured or put in circulation by fraud, proof of these circumstances may be
given against the holder, and on such proof being given, it is incumbent on him to
show himself to be a holder bond jide, and for a valuable consideration, otherwise he
is considered as standing in no better situation than the former holder, in which hands
the instrument received the taint. But it is necessary that express notice should
be previously given to the plaintiff, that he will be called upon at the trial to show
the consideration given by him for the note.
If a note be given for an entire consideration, part of which is legal and part
illegal, the whole contract fails, and there can be no recovery upon the note; but
if there be several considerations, each having its own value fixed by a separate
contract, some of which are legal and some illegal, it fails in part, and is good as te
the residue.’ The consideration of a note for goods sold may be proved by a third
" person, without the production of the books in which the goods were charged.
To an action by an indorsee against the maker of a note, the plaintiff is not bound
to show what consideration he gave for the note, although notice has been given
him to do so, unless the defendant has given evidence tending to show facts which
ought to exonerate him, except as against a bond fide holder for value.*
The indorsee, in a suit against the maker of a promissory note, cannot be called
on to prove consideration, until the defendant has shown it was obtained or put into
circulation by fraud or undue means.® In a suit by an indorsee against the maker
of a note, the presumption is, that the plaintiff obtained it upon a valuable considera-
tion, in the usual course of business, before it was due; and he may rely on this
presumption, until the defendant makes out a prim@ facie case against him, that
the note was obtained by fraud, felony or force. If such proof be made, the holder,
to entitle him to recover, must show that he was a holder by purchase for value,
before the maturity of the note, and without notice of the fraud.’
The maker or indorser of an accommodation note cannot set up want of considera-
tion, as a defence against it, in the hands of a third person, even though it were
placed there merely as collateral security by the party entitled to negotiate it.
If one give a promissory note to another, in order to obtain possession of his
goods, which are wrongfully withheld, it is without consideration between the
parties to it.
Whenever any value or amount shall be received as a consideration in the sale,
assignment, transfer or negotiation, or in payment of any bill of exchange, draft,
check, order, promissory note or other instrument negotiable within this common-
wealth, by the holder thereof, from the indorsee or indorsees, or payer or payers of
the same, and the signature or signatures of any person or persons represented to
be parties thereto, whether as drawer, acceptor or indorser, shall have been forged
thereon, and such value or amount, by reason thereof, erroneously given or paid ;
such indorsee or indorsees, as well as such payer or payers, respectively, shall be
legally entitled to recover back from the person or persons previously holding or
negotiating the same, the value or amount so as aforesaid given or paid by such
indorsee or indorsees, or payer or payers, respectively, to such person or persons,
together with lawful interest thereon, from the time that demand shall have been
made for repayment of the same.’ 5
This act is only declaratory of the existing law. Notice of the forgery within a
reasonable time after its discovery, and an offer to return the note, are necessary to
the maintenance of an action, or the recovery of the consideration paid ; unless the
note be shown to possess no value.’
IV. Notice oF NON-PAYMENT.
An indorser is fixed, by.due notice of non-payment; a protest is not requisite.
No precise form of words is necessary to be used in giving notice of dishonor. It
is, however, obvious, that it should import that the instrument in question has been
13 W.26. 7 Penn. St. 476. And see 97 Ibid. 7 28 Penn. St. 294,
861 8 34 Ibid. 138. 54 Ibid. 398.
23 W. 27. 9 34 Ibid. 142,
88W.&S. 235. 10 Act 5 April 1849 310. Purd. 1733.
4 Ibid. 438. 11 30 Penn. St. 145,527. See 78 Ibid. 205,
5 § Whart. 338. 233, 237. 33 W. N. C. 435.
64W.& S. 445. 13 24 Penn, St. 148.
812 PROMISSORY NOTES.
dishonored ; a mere demand of payment by the holder or his attorney, without any
information that the acceptor or maker has not paid it, will not suffice. And it has
been laid down “that the purpose of giving notice is not merely that the indorser
shall know that the note is not paid, for he is chargeable only in the second degree,
but to render him liable you must show that the holder looked to him for payment,
and give him notice that he did so;” and that the notice must import that the holder
considers the indorser liable, and expects payment from him.’ Verbal notice to the
indorser, of non-payment by the maker, is sufficient. ieee
It is not necessary that actual notice should be given in every case ; but it will
be sufficient, and considered constructive notice, if it be left at the house of the
indorser, or sent by mail, even though the letter should miscarry.* Notice left with
the family of a seafaring man, during his absence at sea is sufficient.* _
Demand and notice may be waived by the indorser ;> and such waiver may be
either in writing or by parol.® ;
A notice sent through the post-office to the maker of a note is not such a demand
as the law requires, when his residence is supposed to be ascertained. Where the
notary was informed that the maker resided in or near a post-town in an adjoining
county, it was held, that a demand sent through the post-office was not snflicient to
charge the indorser.’ _ i
A notice of protest sent by mail is sufficient to charge the indorser, but the fact
of putting the letter into the post-office must be positively proved, and without such
proof, it is error to submit it to the jury.®
A presentment at the maker’s usual place of business, during business hours,
there being no one there to answer, is a sufficient demand to charge the indorser ;
for the maker is bound to have a suitable person there to answer inquiries, and pay
his notes, if there demanded.?
If the maker of a note, payable at a bank, have no funds in the bank when it
falls due, demand of payment is unnecessary.’
If the party die before the note becomes due, notice should be given to his
executor or administrator, if he has been appointed and qualified himself to act,
otherwise it may be left at the dwelling-house of the deceased." In ease of the
death of the indorser of a note, shortly before its maturity, if his decease, and
the granting of letters testamentary to his executors, be unknown to the holder, it
is sufficient, in order to charge his estate, to direct notice of non-payment to the
deceased indorser, by name, at the post-office nearest his late place of residence.? A
notice of the dishonor of a note, indorsed by the testator, given to one named as
executor in the will, who had not joined in the probate or qualified as executor, but
who had not renounced at the time of the notice, and who did not refuse the notice,
is sufficient to charge the estate.’* The death of the maker of a promissory note,
before its maturity, and the granting of letters testamentary to the indorser and
another, as his executors, does not dispense with the necessity of giving notice of
non-payment to the indorser ; and in default of such notice, he is discharged from
all personal liability.*
A tender in gold, made by an acceptor of a bill, to its holder, after it has been
handed to a notary for protest, though within the business hours of brokers, is too
late to save protest or notarial fees.’
By the act 31 May 1893 (Purd. 986) all bills, checks, drafts and notes otherwise pre-
sentable on any holiday shall be deemed to be payable on the business day next suc-
ceeding such holiday, except when payable on any half holiday, Saturday, they shall
be deemed to be payable at or before noon of that day, with a provision that no pro-
test shall be made until the following business day, and that persons receiving bills
due on Saturday shall not be deemed guilty of neglect in not presenting the same for
payment on that day. It is further provided that when the first of January, Wash-
1 Chitty on Bills 71. 9 35 Penn. St. 250.
21 RK. 335, 10 33 Ibid. 134.
355. & R. 322. 3 RB. 355, 117 Johns. 25.
4 5 Binn, 542. 12 34 Penn. St. 54.
588. & R. 438. 18 28 Ibid. 459.
6 106 Penn. St. 531. And see 34 Leg. Int. 232. 14 31 Ibid. 281.
7 3 Whart. 116. 16 11 Ibid. 456.
89 W. 273. !
PROMISSORY NOTES. 813
ington’s Birthday, Fourth of July or Christmas day occur on Sunday, the followin
Monday shall be deemed a holiday, and bills falling due on such Monics shall be aoe
and payable on the next succeeding business day. When Decoration Day falls on
Sunday, the previous Saturday is declared a holiday, and bills falling due on that day
are made payable on the following business day. Bills falling due on Sunday are
made due on the following business day.
VII. Notes PAYABLE IN SPECIFIC ARTICLES.
The geneal rule of the common law is, that when no time or place is fixed by
the contract for the payment or delivery of specific property, there must be an offer
or tender, within a reasonable time, to pay or deliver? If the time of delivery be
fixed by the contract, but not the place, the debtor must seek the creditor, if within
the state, and tender or offer to perform the stipulation contained in the contract;
and if the property be portable, it must be taken to the creditor and delivered to
him; or at his residence.* Even in such case, however, he is not bound to carry
the property about, seeking the creditor, in order to tender it to him; but he must
ask the creditor to appoint a reasonable place to receive it.*
If the property be ponderous, then the debtor must call upon the creditor, a
reasonable tinie before, and ask him to appoint a time and place, when and where
he will receive it.®
If a certain time and place be fixed for the delivery of the articles, it is not
necessary that the plaintiff should prove a demand at the time and place; but to
defeat the plaintiffs action, the defendant must show that he was ready at the time
and place, and continued ready. Such a contract is satisfied, by a delivery of the
articles at the time and place appointed, although the plaintiff was not there to
receive them.’
A contract to pay a given sum in farm produce, or in manufactured articles, or
in store goods, has not the same construction ; in such case, the creditor must call
upon the debtor and select and demand what he will have.®
A firm, who were large dealers in watches and jewelry, accepted an order on
them, to pay “J. M. P. or bearer, $100 in watches or a watch, as may suit a pur-
chaser :” held, that the presumption was that they undertook to pay the order from
their stock on hand, when it should be presented ; and that the holder had no right
to insist on receiving a description of watch which they had not on hand, and
which they would be obliged to procure elsewhere.®
VIII. OF AOTIONS ON PROMISSORY NOTES.
An indorser on a promissory note cannot be sued on and before the full expira-
tion of the last day of grace, although the note has been protested for non-payment
at the close of the usual bank hours, and before the writ was issued.’°
The last indorser of a negotiable note having possession of it, has a right of action
against the maker, and any of the prior indorsers." A negotiable note, payable to
the order of the plaintiff, need not be indorsed by him, before suit brought.” An
action cannot be maintained in the name of an indorsee, upon a promissory note
payable to A. only, and not his order.!* An action may be maintained in the name
of the holder of a note which is payable to bearer, although it be transferred after
it became due.!4
Where an instrument in the form of a promissory note for the payment of a cer-
tain sum of money to A. or bearer, is signed by three persons, and a seal affixed at
1 See title “ Holidays.” 52 W. 140, at Penn. St. 268,
29P.& W. 63. | & S. 381.
8 hid : fw & S. 295. 102M. 353, 6 W. & 8.179.
431 "265. 114 Whart. 489. 9 W. 139.
: enn. St. 265. weer ee ae
aa 132 Dall. 249.
67 W. 380.
15 Ibid. 262. 4 Penn. St. 171. 142 W. 134.
814 PROTHONOTARY.
the signature of one of them, a joint action cannot be maintained against the three,
and if the seal be affixed afterwards, and in the absence of the other two, the instru-
ment is rendered void as to the latter. :
The last indorser of a negotiable note, having possession of it, has a right of
action against the maker and any of the prior indorsers, without a previous resort
to the payee, for whose accommodation it had been discounted.” ;
Where a promissory note is made expressly payable at a particular place, and is
dishonored there, so that the holder is compelled to seek payment elsewhere, he is
entitled to the difference of exchange, if there be any.’
Prothonotary.
A pRoTHonorary is a chief officer or clerk in a court of law.‘ The prothono-
taries and clerks of the several courts of this commonwealth, have and exercise,
respectively, in the courts to which they severally belong, and with full effect, in
term time and vacation, the powers and authorities following, to wit :—
1. To sign and affix the seal of the respective court to all writs and process, and
also to the exemplifications of all records and process therein.
2. To take bail in civil actions, depending in the respective court.
3. To enter judgments, at the instance of plaintiffs, upon the confessions of
defendants.
4. To sign all judgments.
5. To take the acknowledgment of satisfaction of judgments or decrees entered
on the record of the respective court.
6. To administer oaths and affirmations in conducting the business of their
respective offices.®
The prothonotary may appoint a deputy, who may do all acts that his principal
can do ;® as, administer an oath ;? attest a writ ;° or take a recognisance;® and his
deputation will be presumed, when it appears on the record that he so acted.®
But he cannot execute a power of attorney to the prothonotary to discontinue a
suit.
The act 12th February 1874 requires the prothonotaries each to appoint one prin-
cipal deputy, to act in the case of tbe death or resignation of his principal, or when
the office shall become vacant from other causes.”
The prothonotary has no general power to administer judicial oaths, by virtue of
his office ; he can only do so, where the power is specially conferred upon him by
statute.'* ) The act 22d March 1859 gives him such general power (except in Phila-
delphia); but he is not compellable to administer an oath, except in matters pertaining
to the business of his office.“
He is not authorized, by the act of 1834, to take a recognisance of bail for stay
of execution, without the previous approval of the court.’
Judgment may be entered by the prothonotary, upon a written order, sent to him
by the defendant, confessing judgment in an action of debt, and directing him to
enter judgment thereon ;* and a paper authorizing the prothonotary to enter judg-
ment, need not be under seal." A defendant may appear before the prothonotary
and confess judgment in person.’
The prothonotary has no power to receive the amount of a judgment.” But if
the amount for which a judgment has been recovered be claimed by different per-
15 Whart. 563. 10 9 Penn. St. 19. See 1 Clark 312.
29 W. 96, 273. n1sR. 341.
8 27 Penn. St. 241. 12 Purd. 1308.
« Cowel. BIiPL& W.1t 5 W. 3 .
5 Purd. 1740. 4 Purd. 1741, Weegee i
6175S. & R. 285. 1% 1W. &S. 141. See Purd. 1379.
1 5 bid. 333, 16 Ibid. 65. 9 Penn. St.19. 2 16138, &R. 196. Seo 73 Ponn. St. 354,
Brewst. 1. 29 Leg. Int. 165, 8S. & R. 507. Soo 4 Penn. St. 139,
8168. &R. 65. 9 Penn. St. 19. 184 W. 441,
9175. & R. 282. 19 4R, 364, 1 Penn. St, 156. 3 Ibid, 361.
PURCHASERS AT SHERIFFS’ SALES. 815
sons, and the defendant, without any order of court, pay it in to the prothonotary,
it will be deemed a payment to him in his official capacity, and his sureties will
be liable for his faithful appropriation of the money. A prothonotary, as such,
is authorized to receive costs due to his predecessor, and hig sureties are liable
for it.?
A prothonotary who wilfully neglects any duty which he is bound to perform, is
liable upon his official bond, to any one who may be thereby injured.’ In the city
of Philadelphia, he is liable for giving a false search, for a period of five years, to
whoever may be injured by it ;* but in other parts of the state, he is only liable
to the party to whom the false search is given’
An action does not lie by the prothonotary of a court to recover his fees in a
cause which is still depending.
Where a judgment was obtained against a defend-
ant, and the debt, interest and costs, were arranged by the parties thereto; held,
that the officers, under the practice which had so long prevailed, might proceed to
collect their fees from the defendant, by suing out an execution against him, in the
name of the plaintiff, notwithstanding the plaintiff's agreement to pay such fees in
‘ exoneration of the defendant.’
The party for whom the services are done is responsible to the prothonotary for
his fees, and the latter may sue for them like other debts, either before a justice of
the peace or in the proper court when the amount exceeds 300 dollars; but he
has no right to issue an execution for his fees. The fees are not chargeable to the
attorney, unless he becomes security.’ ‘I have always considered it to be the gen-
eral understanding that the plaintiff is liable to the officers for their fees, in case
they cannot be procured from the defendant.’”®
The general practice, both before and since the revolution, has been, for the pro-
\ \ thonotary to receive immediate payment for original writs, writs of removal, sub-
peenas, searches for the parties, copies of papers in the cause, and rules of court.
But for other services, such as the entry of oyer and special imparlance, filing
declarations, entries of pleas, and the like, the costs have been considered as abiding
the event of the action.”
—
Purchasers at Sheriffs’ Sales.
I, Act of assembly.
II. Forms.
I, Act 16 June 1836. Purd 858.
Sxcr. 105. Whenever any lands or tenements shall be sold by virtue of any
execution as aforesaid, the purchaser of such estate may, after the acknowledgment
of a deed therefor to him, by the sheriff, give notice to the defendant, as whose pro-
perty the same shall have been sold, or to the persons in possession of such estate
under him, by title, derived from him subsequently to the judgment under which
the same were sold, and require him or them, to surrender the possession thereof
to him, within three months from the date of such notice. . ;
Sxor. 106. If the defendant, or any person in possession under him as aforesaid,
shall refuse or neglect to comply with the notice and requisition of the purchaser,
as aforesaid, such purchaser, or his heirs or assigns, may apply by petition to any
justice of the peace, alderman or magistrate of the city, town, borough or county
where such real estate may be, setting forth :”
1. That he purchased the premises at a sheriff’s or coroner’s sale.
2. That the person in possession at the time of such application is the defendant,
as whose property such real estate was sold, or that he came into possession thereof
under him.
15 W. & S. 342.
2 26 Penn. St. 395. ;
31.249. 12 Penn. St. 227.
4 Purd. 1741.
56 Phila. 90. 87 Penn. St. 15, And see 3
Keyes 57.
16 Ohio St. 67. 2 Bond 267.
8 4 Binn. 167.
7 3 Penn. St. 423.
31358. & R. 100.
9 4 Binn. 172, Yeates, J. 168. & R. 156.
10 Thid.
1i So amended by act 24 May 1878. Pamph. 135.
§16 PURCHASERS AT SHERIFFS’ SALES.
3. That such person in possession had notice, as aforesaid, of such sale, and was
required to give up such estate, three months previously to such application.
Sxcr. 107. If the applications as aforesaid shall be verified by the oath or affirm-
ation of the petitioner, or if probable cause to believe the facts therein set forth be
otherwise shown, the said justice, alderman or magistrate is hereby enjoined and
required, forthwith to issue his warrant, in the nature of a summons, directed to
the sheriff of the county, commanding him to summon a jury of twelve men of his
bailiwick, to appear before the said justice, alderman or magistrate, at a time and
place to be specified, within four days next after the issuing thereof, and also, to
summon the defendant, or person in possession as aforesaid, at the same time
to appear before him and the said jury, to show cause, if any he has, why delivery
of the possession of such lands or tenements, should not be forthwith given to the
petitioner.*
Szor. 108. If at the time and place appointed for the hearing of the parties, the
defendant, or person in possession as aforesaid, shall fail to appear, the said justices
shall require proof, by oath or affirmation, of the due service of such warrant upon
him, and of the manner of such service: Provided, That such service shall have
been made three days before the return.
Sror. 109. If the defendant, or other person in possession under him as afore-
said, shall be duly summoned as aforesaid, or if he shall appear, the said justices
and jury shall proceed to inquire— ,
1. Whether the petitioner, or those under whom he claims, has or have become
the purchaser of such real estate, at a sheriff’s or coroner’s sale as aforesaid ; and a
sheriff’s or coroner’s deed for the same, duly acknowledged and certified, shall be
fall and conclusive evidence of that fact, before such justices and jury.
2. Whether the person in possession of such real estate was the defendant in the
execution under which such real estate was sold, or came into the possession thereof
under him as aforesaid.
3. Whether the persor so in possession has had three months’ notice of such
sale, previous to such application.
Sxcr. 110. Upon the finding of the facts as aforesaid, the justices shall make a
record thereof, and thereupon, they shall award the possession of such real estate
to the petitioner.
Sor. 111. In case of a finding for the petitioner as aforesaid, the jury shall
assess such damages as they shall think right, against such defendant, or person in
possession, for the unjust detention of the premises, and thereupon, the said justices
shall enter judgment for the damages assessed, and reasonable costs, and such judg-
ment shall be final and conclusive to the parties.
Sxcrt. 112. The said justices shall thereupon issue their warrant, directed to the
sheriff, commanding him forthwith to deliver to the petitioner, his heirs or assigns,
full possession of such lands or tenements, and to levy the costs taxed by the said
justices, and the damages assessed by the jury as aforesaid.
Scr. 113. No certiorari which may be issued to remove such proceedings,
shall be a supersedeas, or have any effect to prevent or delay the execution afore-
said, or the delivery of the possession agreeably thereto.
Sror. 114. If the person in possession of the premises shall make oath or
affirmation before the justices—
1. That he has not come into possession, and does not claim to hold the same
under the defendant in the execution, but in his own right, or—
2. That he has come into possession under title derived to him from the said
defendant, before the judgment under which the execution and sale took place,
and shall become bound in a recognisance, with one or more sufficient sureties, in
the manner hereinafter provided, the said justices shall forbear to give the judg-
ment aforesaid.
Scr. 115. If the person in possession of the premises shall make oath or affirma-
tion, before the justices, that he does not hold the same under said defendant, but
under some other person, whom he shall name, the said justices shall forthwith issue
a summons to such person, requiring him to appear beforé them, at a certain time
therein named, not exceeding thirty days thence following, and if at such time, the
1 So amended by act 24 May 1878, Pamph, 134.
PURCHASERS AT SHERIFFS’ SALES. 817
said person shall appear, and make oath or affirmation, that he verily believes that
he is legally entitled to the premises in dispute, and that he does not claim under
the said defendant, but by a different title, or that he claims under the said
defendant by title derived before the judgment aforesaid, and shall enter into a
recognisance, with sureties, as aforesaid; in such case, also, the justices shall for-
bear to give judgment.
Szcr. 116. The oath or affirmation which shall be administered to such claimant,
shall be in the following form, to wit:
I do (swear or affirm) that I verily believe that I am legally entitled to hold the
premises in dispute, against the petitioner—that I do not claim the same by, from
or under the defendant, as whose property the same were sold (as the case may be)
—that I do not claim the same by, from or under the defendant, as whose property
the same were sold, by title derived to me subsequently to the rendition of the judg-
ment under which the same were sold, but by a different title, de.
Szor. 117. The recognisance aforesaid shall be taken in a sum fully sufficient to
cover and secure, as well the value of the rents and mesne profits of such lands or
tenements, which may have accrued, and which may be expected to accrue, before
the final decision of the said claim, as all costs and damages, with condition that he
shall appear at the next court of common pleas having jurisdiction, and then and
there plead to any declaration in ejectment, which may be filed against him,
thereupon proceed to trial, in due course of practice ; and in case he shall fail
therein, that he will deliver up the said premises to the purchaser, and to pay him
the full value of the rents or mesne profits of the premises, accrued from the time
of the purchase.
Sxcr. 118. If such recognisance shall be forfeited, the justices aforesaid shall
proceed to give judgment, and cause such real estate to be delivered up to the
petitioner, in the manner hereinbefore enjoined and directed.
The act of 1836 embraces the case of a purchaser under a Jevari facias issued
ona judgment obtained on a mechanic’s claim,’ and by act 9th April 1849, § 16, the
like remedy is given to all purchasers of real estate sold under order of the orphans’
court ;? that act extends to sales in partition.’
The notice to quit cannot be given before the acknowledgment ;* the sherif’s
deed is full and conclusive evidence of the purchase.’
Where the defendant is in possession, at the time of the levy and sale, he cannot
make any defence against the purchaser ; by the purchase under regular process, the
purchaser acquires a right, at least, to the possession of the debtor, which alone will
support ejectment against him. Such proceedings will lie against a corporation."
The notice may be proved in any manner the legislature may direct ; it is not a
matter of right.®
No person but the sheriff himself is competent to perform the duty of selecting
the jurors; it is a judicial act, requiring judgment and discretion, which cannot be
deputed to another.®
It is sufficient, if the inquest find that the purchaser gave ‘‘due and legal
notice” to the defendants.” The finding of the jury is conclusive on the question
of notice.
If the inquest cannot agree, they may be discharged, and a new jury summoned.¥
In analogous proceedings, under the landlord and tenant law, the landlords are not
concluded by the finding of the jury, although the tenants are; they may renew
their complaint before other justices. dil Ete
It is the duty of the jury to assess the damages ; and it is error for the justices
to do so.* The judgment cannot be certified to the common pleas, under the act of
1810, in order to create a lien on real estate ;* nor can an action of debt be main-
1 95 Penn. St. i 8 89 Penn. St. 450.
a Pane ake a ® 8 Ibid. 445, 452. 8 Phila. 342.
8 ¢ 10 1 R. 317.
‘ aR EE oe 11 56 Penn. St. 198.
5 6 Penn. St. 23 24 W. & 8. 120.
6 Penn. St. 239. .
62 Y,443, 88. & RB. 317. 1 R.223. 3 188 Penn. St. 414.
W. 227. 2 Penn. St.27. 3 Ibid. 276. 18 Ibid. 4 4 Clark 453.
454, a Ibid. ney Be m E 1 Gault v. McKinney, Purd. 769 n. 1 W. N.O
7 56 Penn. St. 198. 414, 2 Ibid. 478. ~
52
818 PURCHASERS AT SHERIFFS’ SALES.
tained upon it.! The practice is, for the justice, to give judgment for a gross sum
for costs ; and the court, on certiorari, will presume that they were duly taxed.?
A writ of error is the proper remedy for the revision of the judgment of the com-
mon pleas on a certiorari ;° but the certiorari brings into the common pleas nothing
but the record of the proceedings of the justices and jury; and on error,
nothing else is before the supreme court. The defendant in the execution cannot
stay proceedings, under the 114th section, by making affidavit that he is in posses-
sion under a contract with the purchaser at sheriff’s sale, on which he has paid a
part of the consideration-money ;> he must show either a conveyance, or such an
equitable right to one, as would sustain a decree for specific performance. An
affidavit, that he does not hold possession of the whole of the premises under the
defendant, is insufficient; he should explain what part he so held.”
It is sufficient, if the oath and recognisance be tendered, at any time before judg-
ment.® The affidavit must strictly conform to the statute ;° an affidavit in the words
of the statute is sufficient ; the party need not set forth his title.° A summons to
the person named as owner is indispensable to sustain a judgment for possession.”
If a cause be certified into court under the 117th section, it is equivalent to a
removal by certiorari to a higher court for trial, and all the proceedings thereafter
are part of the same case that was begun before the justices, and not a new cause ;
and damages for wrongful detention are properly included in the verdict, even though
notice of such claim be not given.” On the trial, the defendant cannot give evidence
of title inconsistent with the affidavit and claim before the justices.* He his bound to
show that he has a title to the possession which he did not obtain under the defend-
ant in the execution ; or which he obtained under him before judgment on which
the execution issued.* He may show a title derived from a sheriff’s sale of the
land to him, as the property of the plaintiff, after the commencement of the pro-
ceedings before the justices, and whilst the cause is pending in court, and thus
defeat the plaintiff’s recovery.
III. Nortoz.
To E. F. Philadelphia, February 1st, 1884.
Sir,—You are hereby notified and required to quit, remove from and surrender up to
me, possession of the premises [here describe the premises] which you now occupy, and
which I have purchased at sheriff’s sale, as it is my desire to have possession of the same,
A.B
PETITION.
To G. E., Esquire, one of the Magistrates of the City of Philadelphia :
Tue compiaint of [A. B.] most respectfully sets forth: That he the said [A. B.], on
the [first] day of [January], 4. p. 1884, purchased at sheriffs sale [here describe the pre-
mises], with the appurtenances, and that [E. F.], now in possession thereof, is the defend-
ant, a8 whose property the said premises were sold; and that he the said [A. B.], being
desirous to possess himself of the said premises, for that purpose did, on the [first] da:
of [February] last past, require the said [E. F.] to surrender unto him the said [ A. B.],
possession of the said premises so ocoupied by him, and that the said [E. F.] hath hith-
erto refused, and still doth refuse to comply therewith ; that three months having elapsed
since the service of the said notice, he makes this his complaint, that such proceedings
may be taken by you, as are directed by the act of assembly in such case made and ag
vided. A. B.
Sworn before me, this [fourth] day of [May], 4. p. 1884. G. E., Magistrate. «
PRECEPT.
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ss.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To the Sheriff of Philadelphia county, greeting:
Wuernas, a petition, verified by the [oath] of [A. B.], the petitioner, was this day
presented to G, H., Esq., one of our magistrates of the city of Philadelphia, setting forth,
1148. &R. 162. 2 W. N.C. 586. Butsee 2 And sec 13 Phila. 26.
Phila. 71, contra. 8358. & RB. 95.
25W. ie 910 W. N.C. 532,
81R. 317. 10 12 Ibid. 240, See 11 Ibid. 197. 1 te
4 56 Penn. St. 198, R. 32. : i Chon. 98
5 Cress v. Righter, Purd. 769 n. 1 100 Penn. St. 429. 18 Phila, 26,
62Gr.117. See 5 W.17. 12 30 Penn. St. 352.
76 8. & R. 157. As to what is a sufficient 13 1 Ibid. 183. 2 W. 143.
averment of title derived from the defendant 1 30 Penn. St. 362.
before the judgment, see 3 S.& R.95; 5 W.17. 13 9 W. 149.
PURCHASERS AT SHERIFFS’ SALES. 819
that he the said [A. B.], on the [first] day of [January], 1884, purchased at sheriff’s
sale [here describe the premises}, with the appurtenances; and that [E. F.|, now in
possession thereof, is the defendant as whose property the said premises were sold; that
being desirous to possess himself of the premises, for that purpose, he, the said [A. B.],
did, three months previously to his application to me, require of the said [E. rf to sur-
render unto him, the said [A. B.], possession of the said premises so occupied by him.
Therefore we command you, that you summon twelve men of your bailiwick, so that they
be and appear before our said magistrate, at [the house of X. Y., No. 250 North Tenth
street, in the said city], on the [seventh] day of [May], 1884, at [ten] o’clock in the
forenoon of that day ; and that you also summon the said [E. F.], so that they be and
appear before our said magistrate and the said jury, at the day and place last aforesaid,
to show cause, if any he hath, why delivery of the possession of said premises should
not be forthwith given to the said [A. B.], according to the form and effect of the act of
the general assembly in such case made and provided ;—and this you shall nowise omit.
And have you then and there this writ. Witness the said G. E., Esquire, at the city of
Philadelphia aforesaid, the [fourth] day of [May] 1884.
G. E. [seat]
Return of the Sheriff.—To the magistrate within named, I do certify that I have sum-
moned twelve good and lawful men of my bailiwick, and have also summoned the within-
named EK. F. to be and appear at the day and place within mentioned, as within I am
commanded. 30 answers, W. D., Sheriff.
Oath of Jurors.—' You and each of you do swear [or affirm] that you will well and
truly inquire of'and concerning the premises in this precept mentioned, and assess such
damages (if any) as the complainant hath sustained thereby.”
INQUISITION.
Inquisition, taken at [the house of X. Y., No. 250 North Tenth street, in the city of
Philadelphia], on the [seventh| day of [May], in the year eighteen hundred and eighty-
four, before G. E., Esq., one of our magistrates of the said city, by the oaths of ct R.,
S. T., &e.], and the solemn affirmations of [N. H., 0. K., &c.|, twelve good and lawful
men of the said city, who upon their oaths and affirmations respectively do say, that
[A. B.] on the [first] day of [January], in the year one thousand eight hundred and
eighty-four, purchased at sheriff’s sale [here describe the premises|, with the appurten-
ances, and that [E. F.] is now in possession thereof, and is the defendant, as whose
roperty the said premises were sold; and the said [A. B.] being desirous to possess
imself of the said premises, for that purpose, did, on the [first] day of [February], 1884,
demand of and require the said [E. F'.] to surrender unto him, the said [A. B.], posses-
sion of the said premises so occupied by him, and that the said [E. F.] hath hitherto
refused, and still doth refuse, to comply with the said demand and requisition to remove
from and leave the said premises. And the said jurors do assess damages against the
said [E. F.] for the unjust detention of the said premises, at [one hundred dollars],
besides all costs of suit. Whereupon, it is considered by our said magistrate, that posses-
sion of the said premises be given to the said [A. B.|, and that he recover of the said
[E. F.] his damages aforesaid, together with the costs of suit, amounting to [thirty
dollars]. In testimony whereof, as well the said magistrate as the said jurors have here-
unto set their hands and seals, the day and year first above written, at the city aforesaid.
G. BE. [szau.]
M.R., S. T., &e. [szazs.]
RECORD.
Br I? REMEMBERED, that on the [fourth] day of [May], in the year one thousand eight
hundred and eighty-four, at the city of Philadelphia, due proof was made before me,
G. E., Esq., one of the magistrates of the said city, that ie B.], on the [first] day of
deugeryt in the year eighteen hundred and eighty-four], purchased at sheriff’s sale
here describe the premises|, with the appurtenances, and that [E. F.], now in possession
thereof, is the defendant as whose property the said premises were sold; and the said
A. B.], being desirous to possess himself of the said premises, for that purpose did, on
the [first] day of [February] 1884, demand of and require the said [H. F.] to surrender
unto him the said [A. B.] possession of the said premises so occupied by him ; and that
the said [E. F.] hath hitherto refused, and still doth refuse, to comply with the said
demand and requisition to remove from and leave the said premises. Whereupon, the
said [A. B.], then, to wit, on the said [fourth] day of [May], eighteen hundred and
cane toatk at the city aforesaid, prayed the said magistrate, that-a due remedy in that
behalf be provided for him, according to the form of the act of the general assembly of
the state of Pennsylvania, in such case made and provided; upon which proof and com-
plaint, the sheriff of the county of Philadelphia is commanded that he summon twelve
820 PURCHASERS AT SHERIFFS SALES.
men of his bailwick, so that they be and appear before the said magistrate, at the [house
of X. Y¥., No. 240 North Tenth street], on [Friday], the foe day of [May] 1884, at
ten o’clock in the forenoon of that day; and that he also summon the said [E. F.], so
that he be and appear before the said magistrate and the said jury, at the day and place
last aforesaid, to show cause, if any he hath, why possession of the said premises should
not be forthwith made to the aforesaid [A. Bie ‘Afterwards, to wit, on the said [seventh]
day of [May] 1884, at the [house of X. Y. aforesaid], W. D., Esq., sheriff of the county
of Philadelphia, appears before the said magistrate, and returns, that by virtue of the
said warrant to him directed, he had summoned twelve good and lawful men, to wit,
[M. B., S. T., &c.], and had also summoned the said [E. F.], to be and appear at this day
and place, as by the said warrant he was commanded; and the said jury being called,
appear, and are severally sworn and affirmed. And the said [E. F.] also appears; and
we the said magistrate and the aforesaid jury proceed to hear and examine the proofs
and allegations offered by the said parties, and do find that the said [A. B.] on the
[first] day of [January] 1884, purchased at sheriff's sale [here describe the premises],
with the appurtenances ; and that the said [E. F.] is in possession thereof, and is the
defendant, as whose property the said premises were sold; and the said [A. B.], being
desirous to possess himself of the said premises, for that a did, on the [first] day
of |February] 1884, demand of and require the said [E. F.] to surrender unto him, the
said [A. B.], possession of the said premises so occupied by him; and that the said
[E. F.] hath hitherto refused, and still doth refuse, to comply with the said demand and
requisition to remove from and leave the said premises ; and the said jury assess the sum
of [one hundred dollars] for the damages of the said [A. B.], occasioned by the unjust
detention of the said premises. Therefore it is considered and adjudged by the said
magistrate, that the said [A. B.] shall and do recover and have of the said [E. Fi as
well the said sum of [one hundred dollars] for his damages aforesaid, as [thirty dollars]
for his reasonable costs, by him expended in and about his suit in this behalf; concern-
ing which the premises aforesaid we do make this our record. In testimony whereof, I,
the said magistrate, to this my record, have set my hand and seal, at the city of Phil-
adelphia aforesaid, the [seventh] day of |May], one thousand eight hundred and [eighty-
four. G. E. [seat]
WRIT OF POSSESSION.
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ss.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To the Sheriff of Philadelphia county, greeting :
Wuerzas, due proof bath been made before G. E., Esquire, one of the magistrates of
the said city, and twelve good and lawful men, summoned for that purpose, that [A. B.],
on the [first day of [January], a. p. 1884, purchased at sheriff’s sale Where describe ti
premises], with the appurtenances, and that |[E. F.] is now in possession thereof, and is
the defendant as whose property the said premises were sold; and that the said [A. B.],
being desirous to possess himself of the said premises, for that purpose, did, on the
[first] day of |February] 1884, demand of and require the said [E. F.] to surrender unto
him, the said i B.], possession of the said premises so occupied by him, and that the
said [. F.] hath hitherto refused, and still doth refuse, to comply therewith ; all which
premises being duly found by the said magistrate and jurors, according to the form of
the act of general assembly in such case made and provided: We therefore command
you, the said sheriff, forthwith to deliver to the said [A. B.] full possession of the pre-
mises aforesaid; and we also command you, that of the goods and chattels of the said
[E. F.] in your bailiwick, you cause to be levied as well the sum of {one hundred dollars],
which to the said [A. B.] was awarded for his damages sustained by the unjust detention
of the premises, as also [thirty dollars] for his costs and charges by him in and about
his suit in that behalf expended, whereof the said [E. F.] is convict. And thereof fail
not. Witness the said G. H., at the city aforesaid, the [seventh] day of May], a. D. one
thousand eight hundred and eighty-four. B E” [seat]
[ 821 ]
Race and Color,
Act 19 May 1887. Purd. 533.
Any person, company, corporation, being owner, lessee or manage: of any restaurant,
hotel, railroad, street railway, omnibus line, theatre, concert-hall, or place of enter-
tainment or amusement, who shall refuse to accommodate, convey or admit any person
or persons on account of race or color over their lines, or into their hotel, or restaurant,
theatre, concert-hall, or place of amusement, shall, upon conviction thereof, be guilty
of a misdemeanor, and be punished by fine not less than fifty dollars nor more than
one hundred dollars.
Railroads,
[See Common Carriers. |
Act 24 May 1878. Purd. 1808.
Scr. 1. Any person found entering, or being, in or upon any railroad engine or
car, whether the same be passenger, freight, coal, or other car, on any railroad in any
city or county of this commonwealth, contrary to the rules of the person or persons, or
corporation, owning or operating the same, and with the intention of being in or upon,
riding or travelling upon such engine or car, without paying fare, or committing
larceny, violence or destruction thereon, or of threatening, intimidating or assaulting
travellers or. other persons, upon such engine or cars, shall, upon conviction, forfeit
and pay a penalty of not less than five dollars or more than fifteen dollars; which
penalty shall be paid to the treasurer of the school district in which said offence was
committed, for the use of said district, or be committed to the county jail of said
county, for a period not exceeding ten days, either or both, at the discretion of the
magistrate; and in default of payment of fine as aforesaid, and costs, then the said
alderman, magistrate or justice of the peace shall commit the person so convicted to
the jail of the county wherein the offence was committed, for a further period, not
exceeding ten days.”
Sxct. 2. Any constable or police officer, having knowledge or being notified of any
violation of this act, shall forthwith arrest such offender and take him before any
magistrate, alderman or justice of the peace; or any such magistrate, alderman or,
justice of the peace shall issue a warrant or capias for the arrest of any such offender,
upon information duly made, on oath or affirmation. And said magistrate, alderman
or justice, upon the person charged being produced before him, shall forthwith pro-
ceed to hear and determine the matter in issue, and if he shall convict the person so
charged with the violation of the provisions of this act, he shall proceed to pronounce
the forfeiture of the penalty which he shall adjudge against the person so convicted,
and shall commit the person so convicted to the county jail of the proper county for
the period aforesaid; and if the person so convicted refuse or neglect to pay such
penalty and costs immediately, then the said magistrate, alderman or justice shall
commit the person so convicted to the jail of the county wherein the offence was com-
mitted, for a further period, not exceeding ten days.
1See Purd, 533 and title “ Railroads.” 2 So amended by act 11 June 1879. Pamph. 152.
[ 822 ]
Rape.
I. Provisions of the Penal Code. II. Judicial decisions.
III. Form of a warrant for a rape.
I. If any person shall have unlawful carnal knowledge of a woman, forcibly and
against her will,! or who, being of the age of sixteen years and upwards, shall unlaw-
fully and carnally know and abuse any woman child under the age of sixteen years,
with or without her consent, such person shall be adjudged guilty of felonious rape,
and on conviction, be sentenced to pay a fine, not exceeding one thousand dollars, and
undergo an imprisonment, by separate or solitary confinement at labor, or by simple
imprisonment, not exceeding fifteen years: Provided, however, That upon the trial of
any defendant charged with the unlawful carnal knowledge and abuse of a woman
child under the age of sixteen years, if the jury shall find that such woman child was
not of good repute, and that the carnal knowledge was with her consent, the defendant
shall be acquitted of the felonious rape and convicted of fornication only.?
Any person who takes a female child under the age of sixteen years for the purpose
of prostitution or sexual intercourse, or, without the consent of her father, mother,
guardian or other person having legal custody of her person, for the purpose of mar-
riage, or who inveigles or entices any such minor female child into a house of ill-fame,
or of assignation, or elsewhere, for the purpose of prostitution or sexual intercourse,
shall, in every such case, be guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof,
shall be sentenced to imprisonment, at separate or solitary confinement at labor, for
not more than five years, or pay a fine, not exceeding one thousand dollars, or both, at
the discretion of the court.®
Tt shall not be necessary, in any case of rape, sodomy or carnal abuse of a female
child, under the age of ten years, to prove the actual emission of seed, in order to
constitute a carnal knowledge, but the carnal knowledge shall be deemed complete
upon proof of penetration only.*
If any person shall be guilty of committing an assault and battery upon a female,
with intent, forcibly and against her will, to have unlawful carnal knowledge of such
female, every such person shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and, on conviction, be
sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars, and to undergo an imprison-
ment, by separate or solitary confinement, at labor, not exceeding five years.
1 Where the consent of the female is obtained,
though by fraud or deception, there is no rape;
but connection with a woman, when insensible
punishment, which previously had been inflicted
under the 4th section of the act of 1794. ‘The
amendment contemplated by this section makes
or unconscious, from whatever cause, is rape.
Absence of assent will constitute rape, except
where the female is under ten years of age; but
assent, after the act, is no defence: if consent
be given, but withdrawn before the act, and the
saine be forcible and against consent, the offence
is complete. Where there is nothing to deter
the woman from resistance, and she is conscious,
and able to show dissent, and do not do so, it
will be taken as her assent; a doubtful or mixed’
case will not make out the offenos,
See 3 Clark 127. 5 W. & S. 345.
2 Act 19 May 1887, which isan amendment of
the act 31 March 1860, 91. P.L. 405. Upon
an indictment for rape, the jury may convict of
fornication and bastardy. 140 P.S. 561. The
only act of assembly now in force in reference
to this crime (rape), is the 4th scotion of the act
of 23 April 1829, P. L. 343, providing for its
2 Pitts. 391.
the unlawful carnal knowledge of a woman child,
under the age of ten years, with or without her
consent, a felonious rape; the 93d section pun-
ishes assaults, with intent to commit a rape;
and the 92d section settles a question which is
sometimes agitated in courts, as to the evidence
necessary to establish the consummation of the
crime. Report on the Penal Code 26. A de-
fendant charged with rape and bastardy and
surrendered by another state ‘‘to be tried for
the crime of rape and that only,” may be con-
victed of fornication and bastardy upon the
trial of the original indictment. 12 C. C. 263.
S Act 28 May 1885. Purd. 535. This aot ia
constitutional, 3C.C. 276. It is not repealed
by the act 19 May 1887. 44 L. I. 482.
4 Act 31 March 1860 292. Purd. 535.
6 Act 31 March 1860 5 93. Purd. 535,
RAPE. 823
II. Rape is the carnal knowledge of a female, forcibly and against her will.!
It is not, however, necessary in order to constitute this offence, that the sexual inter-
course should have been actually against the will of the prosecutrix ; it is enough,
that it was obtained without her consent. Thus, where a medical man had sexual
connection with a girl of the age of fourteen, who was ignorant of the nature of
the act, and made no resistance, solely from the bond fide belief that the defendant
was, as he represented, treating her medically, with a view to her cure, it was held
to be a case of rape.
So, it is rape, to have carnal knowledge of a female, whilst in a state of insensi-
bility, and without power over her will, whether that state be caused by the defend-
ant or not; if he knew that she was in such state.* It is also rape to have carnal
intercourse with an idiotic or insane woman, though her consent be given, she
being incapable of intelligent submission.*
It has been held to be rape, fraudulently to have carnal knowledge of a woman
under circumstances which induce her to suppose it is her husband.’ But the
better opinion, both in England and America, would appear to be, that such an act
is not rape, where the intention of the defendant was to have connection by fraud,
but not by force ;° when the consent of the female is obtained, though by fraud or
deception, there is no rape.”
It must appear that the offence was committed without the consent of the woman ;
but it is no excuse that she yield at last to the violence, if her consent was forced
from her by fear of death or by duress. Nor is it any excuse (for the offender) that
she consented after the fact, or that she was a common strumpet; for she is still
under the protection of the law, and may not be forced; or that she was first taken
with her own consent, if she was afterwards forced against her will; or that she
was a concubine to the ravisher, for a woman may forsake her unlawful course of
life, and the law will not presume her incapable of amendment. All these cir-
cumstances, however, are material to be left to the jury (and the consideration of
the justice) in favor of the accused, more especially in doubtful cases, and where the
woman’s testimony is not corroborated by other evidence.®
A man cannot be himself guilty of a rape on his own wife, for the matrimonial
consent cannot be retracted ;? but he may be criminal in aiding and abetting
others in such a design.”
A boy under the age of fourteen years may be convicted of an assault, with
intent to commit a rape, notwithstanding want of capacity to commit the higher
offence.”
III. ForM OF WARRANT FOR A RAPE.
COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON, ss.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To any Constable of the said county, greeting:
You are hereby commanded to take the body of [A. B.], if he be found in the said
county, and bring him before [J. R.], one of our justices of the peace in and for the
said county, to answer the commonwealth upon a charge, founded on the oath of C. D.,
of having, on the eighth day of this month, May, in the woods at the Cross Roads, two
miles from Easton, on the road to Bethlehem, overtaken the defendant, and there felo-
niously did, by force and violence, ravish and have carnal knowledge of her, the said C.
D.. against her will, and further to be dealt with according to law. And for so doing,
this shall be your warrant. Witness the said [J. R.], at Easton, who hath hereunto set
his hand and seal, the [ninth] day of [June], in the year of our Lord one thousand
eight hundred and eighty. J. R., Justice of the Peace. [sEau.]
The proceedings before the justice are similar to what they are in other cases of
acriminal nature. But he has no power to admit to bail.
' 3 Chit. Cr. L. 570. 6 R. & R. 487. 6 Cox 0. C. 412. 4 Leigh 648,
2 1 Den. C. C. 580. 2 Swan 394. 30 Ala. 54,
3 Ibid. 90. Whart. & St. Med. Jur. 3 458-9. 7 2 Pitts. 391.
2 Pitts. 391. 8 Ros. Cr. L. 709. See 3 Am. L. J. 318,
410 West. L. J. 501-5. Whart. & St. Med. Jur. 9 1 Hale H. P. C. 629.
¢ 463 n. 10 1 Harg. St. Tr. 388.
5 Whart. Cr. L. 2 1144. 7 Conn. 54. ll Lewis’ Cr. L. 102. But see 3 0. & P. 366.
[ 824 ]
Receipts,
Receipts are acknowledgments in writing of having received a sum of money or
other value. A receipt is either a voucher for an obligation discharged or one
incurred.’ A receipt is only evidence of a payment and satisfaction, and may be
explained by parol or other evidence.? ad
A receipt in full of all demands is only prima facie evidence of what it imports
to be; and upon satisfactory proof being made that it was obtained by fraud, or
given either under a mistake of facts or an ignorance of the law, it may be inquired
into and corrected in a court of law, as well as in a court of equity. A receipt in
full, on a settled account, is not conclusive on the parties, but is merely prima facie
evidence of what it imports, and may be opened, if it be unfairly obtained, or be
given under a mistake of facts, or of the legal rights of the party complaining, for
the correction of such errors as may be made out by proof. But yet, if it be the
result of a compromise, it is binding.
Plaintiff paid money for goods sold to him by defendant, and lost the receipt ; ke
was sued ‘and obliged to pay the money over again; after this, he found the receipt,
and brought an action to recover the money back. He was nonsuited by Lord
Kenyon, and a new trial was refused, being applied for on the ground of evidence
discovered after the trial.®
If the question be whether a receipt, to which there is a subscribing witness, was
given, the witness must be called, but the fact of the payment of the money may be
proved by any witness.®
An acknowledgment in the body of a deed, of the payment of purchase-money,
and a receipt indorsed for the same, are not conclusive evidence of payment, nor a
bar to a suit for such purchase-money ;* and such receipt is not conclusive of the
fact either by plea in bar, as an estoppel, or in evidence toa jury.* It is no evidence
whatever of the fact of payment, against a stranger.®
A receipt for the price of goods, given by an agent of a consiguee, is a receipt by
his employer, so as to enable the consignor to maintain an action for money had and
teceived, against the consignee.’?
A receipt given by a third person, is not competent evidence to establish the
payment of money; the fact must be attested by him on oath, in the ordinary
way."
To the rule that payments to any other person than the party to a suit must be
proved by a witness, a payment to a public officer is an established exception. Thus,
a receipt for taxes given by a collector of taxes, is admissible, without producing
the officer ; so, of the duplicate of the assessment of a township." A receipt does
not exclude parol evidence of the payment;" it is competent to give parol evidence
to explain a written receipt, and show that it was given for a note and not for
money. In this case, Judge Sergeant, in delivering the opinion of the court, said,
“receipts are open to explanation by parol evidence of what occurred at the time
between the parties, and of the circumstances and conditions under which they were
sare But if a receipt embody evidence of the contract, it cannot be varied by
parol,’®
- Whart. L. Dict. 640. ® 28 Penn. St. 410.
21W.C. C. 328. 3N. Y. 88. 10 4 Whart. 526.
8 Pet. C. C. 182. 5 Gilm. 487. M4 W, 424,
44W.0. C. 562. 12 Tbid. 73.
57 T. BR. 269. 318 1 Esp. 213.
6 6 Binn. 16. 4 1W.& 8S. 321.
7658. & RB. 309, B 1 Phila. 503.
8 8 Ibid. 564. 12 Ibid, 131.
[ 825 ]
Records,
Aot 31 Marouw 1860. Purd. 507.
Sxor. 15. If any prothonotary, clerk, register, public officer, or other person,
shall fraudulently make a false entry in, or erase, alter, secrete, carry away or
destroy any public record, or any part thereof, of any court or public office of this
commonwealth, such person shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and, on conviction,
shall be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars, and to undergo
an imprisonment, by separate or solitary confinement, at labor, not exceeding two
years.
Every registry or enrolment, directed by law, and preserved for the use of the
ne such as the books of the land-office and board of property, are protected by
this act.
Riots, Routs and Unlawful Assemblies.
I. What constitutes a riot, rout and unlawful III. How a riot may be suppressed.
assembly. TV. Form of a warrant to arrest rioters.
II. Provisions of the Penal Code.
I. A Rtor is a tumultuous disturbance of the public peace, by three persons, or
more, assembling together of their own authority, with an intent mutually to assist
one another against any one who shall oppose them; and afterwards putting the
design into execution in a terrific and violent manner, whether the object in ques-
tion be lawful or otherwise.?
A RoUT is where three or more meet to do an unlawful act, upon a common
quarrel ; as forcibly to break down fences, &c., upon any claim or pretence of right,
&e., and make any advances toward it.
AN UNLAWFUL ASSEMBLY is where three or more do assemble themselves
together, to do an unlawful act, as to pull down inclosures, &c., and part without
doing it, or making any motion toward it.
II. Act 31 Marcu 1860. Purd. 536.
Seor. 19. If any person shall be concerned in any riot, rout, unawful assembly
or an affray, and shall be thereof convicted, he shall be guilty of a misdemeanor,
and be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars, or undergo an
imprisonment not exceeding two years, or both, or either, at the discretion of the
court; and in case any one is convicted of an aggravated riot, the court may
sentence the offender to imprisonment by separate or solitary confinement, at labor,
not exceeding three years.
Sect. 20. If any persons, riotously and tumultuously assembled together, to the
disturbance of the public peace, shall, unlawfully and with force, demolish or pull
down or destroy, or begin to demolish, pull down or destroy any public building,
private dwelling, church, meeting-house, stable, barn, mill, granary, malt-house or
out-house, or any building or erection used in carrying on any trade or manufacture,
or any branch thereof, or any machinery, whether fixed or movable, prepared for or
employed in any manufacture or any branch thereof, or any steam-engine or other
engine for sinking, working or draining any mine, or any building or erection used
in conducting the business of any mine, or any bridge, wagon-way, road or trunk,
for conveying minerals from any mine; every such offender shall be guilty of a
misdemeanor, and being convicted thereof, shall be imprisoned by separate or soli-
tary confinement, at labor, or by simple imprisonment, not exceeding seven years.
138. & R.207. 2 1 Hawk. P. C. ch. 65. 11 Daly 1. 4 Clark 1.
826 RIOTS, ROUTS,ETC.
Sgor. 31. If any person shall, wilfully and maliciously, disturb or interrupt any
meeting, society, assembly or congregation, convened for the purpose of religious
worship, or for any moral, social, literary, scientific, agricultural, horticultural or
floral object, ceremony, examination, exhibition or lecture, such person shall,
on conviction, be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding fifty dollars, and suffer an
imprisonment not exceeding three months, or both, or either, at the discretion of
the court.
ILI. The riot acts of England are not in force here, but it is conceived that the
common law invests the proper authorities with ample power to suppress riotous
assemblies by violent means, if rendered necessary to prevent the destruction of
property, or injury to the persons or lives of the people." Our own courts have
sanctioned this doctrine, in a charge delivered to the grand jury for the city and
county of Philadelphia, by his honor Judge Parsons, in which the learned judge
says :—
P If there be a disturbance of the public peace, or a riot in a ward or township,
it is required that the constable suppress it, if possible, by arresting, with or with-
out warrant, those offending, and bringing them before committing magistrates for
trial. He may command all persons to aid and assist him in apprehending the
offenders, and use all the force necessary to accomplish it. Aldermen and justices
of the peace are likewise bound to aid in having those engaged in a violation of the
law, or such as are aiding, abetting or assisting, or ready to aid, abet or assist,
apprehended and held to bail for their good behavior, or in default of bail, to
commit them to prison. If there be not sufficient force in the ward or township
to effect their arrest, then those officers should make immediate complaint to the
high sheriff of the county, and require aid from him, and if he be informed by
those officers, or from any other source, of such violation of law, it is his duty im-
mediately to summon a posse comitatus (if need be), the whole power of the county,
for the suppression of any riot, or the dispersion of a mob, whose object is to commit
personal violence upon any citizens, or to destroy property, either public or private.
“Tf there be reason to believe that the insurgents are armed with hurtful weapons,
and an ordinary civil force is not sufficient to arrest them, he should call out a
military force for that purpose—the citizen soldiery. All persons possessing physical
strength are bound to obey the command of the sheriff—none are exempt Any
one refusing to go, is guilty of a crime for such refusal, and on conviction of the
offence, is liable to a fine and imprisonment. Every officer and soldier is bound to
attend the sheriff, armed and equipped, if he direct it, and for the occasion, is subject
to his command.
“The sheriff is then bound to use that degree of force which is necessary to
suppress the riot, tumult or disturbance of the public peace, and to prevent the
destruction of property, or injury to the persons or lives of the citizens.
“Tt may be asked, what degree of force can be exercised on such an occasion?
On this point, I will be explicit. If a great number of persons are assembled
together, armed with guns or other hurtful weapons, and their object is manifest
to do great personal violence to an individual, or a certain class of individuals, or to
destroy public or private property, and they refuse to submit to the law, resist the
sheriff or his assistants when they attempt an arrest, and that with violence; when
they refuse to disperse, after being commanded by that officer, and are fully bent on
violence to the persons or property of others, and all other probable means for the
suppression of the outrage fail, that officer may order his posse to take the Lives
of the insurgents, if necessary. When driven to that impassable strait, when
the sheriff must see the property and lives of the community destroyed by violence,
without his having the power to avert it, unless by the destruction of human life,
he may adopt it as the last alternative, and the law justifies him; upon the same
principle that it docs for the execution of a criminal condemned by the sentence of
a court. Rioters thus assembled and bent on mischief are eneinies to the state ;
they have declared war against the government under which they live, and in a
legal point of view are little better than pirates.
“Tf the sheriff find the whole force of the county insufficient for the suppression
1 1 Hale H. P. C. 495. 1 Hast P. C. 304.
RIOTS, ROUTS, ETC. 827
of the mob, he should immediately make a requisition upon the governor for a
military force, who is bound to call out the militia of the state, as commander-in-
chief; and, if there be too many disaffected in the state, to suppress internal tumult
and violence, the executive can make a requisition upon the President of the United
States for the forces under his command. Hence we see that our government is
sufficiently powerful to control any violence which may arise.
“ By an act of assembly, passed the 31st May 1841, if property is destroyed in
consequence of any mob or riot, the owner may sue the county for the damage
he sustains, and it must be paid out of the county funds. By another section of the
act, the owner of such property is required to give notice to the sheriff, &c., of
the intention of the mob, if it be known to him, and he has time before it ig
destroyed. The act also provides, ‘and it shall be the duty of the said sheriff,
aldermen, constables and justices, upon the receipt of such notice, to take all legal
means to protect said property so attacked, or threatened to be attacked.” This
statute is in addition to the common-law principles which have been stated, and
leaves no doubt as to the authority of the sheriff to suppress a riot, or disperse a
mob, by the employment of any force necessary to accomplish the object, even at the
sacrifice of the life of an assailant. ;
“This should be done only in the last extremity, when it is apparent no other
power will enable the sheriff to protect the persons or property of the community.
The lives of the aggressors should not be sacrificed, except under such circumstances
as seem to demand it, for the protection of the innocent and unoffending, and when
that officer is conscious that peace and good order can in no other way be restored.
When the order issues from him for this dernier resort, all who act under it and
strictly execute it are justified in what they do in obedience to the same.
“ Military officers and soldiers are amenable to a judicial tribunal, if they refuse
to obey the orders of the sheriff, when so called out by him. A disobedience of the
directions of that officer, which would subject soldiers and militia officers to a trial
before a court-martial, if they were called into service by the commander-in-chief
or a superior officer, would make them criminals in the eye of the law, and they can
be tried before a court having criminal jurisdiction.
“ They are acting under a civil authority, in the capacity of officers and soldiers,
yet as citizens armed and equipped to perform a duty enjoined by the civil power.
Any citizens not enrolled in the militia might be armed in the same manner by the
orders of the sheriff, and the responsibility of each would be the same. Nay, the
sheriff may require all whom he enrols in his posse comitatus to be armed and
equipped, if, in his opinion, the occasion demand it for the suppression of an out-
rage upon the peace of society. It is his duty to bring to his aid at all timesa force
sufficient to repel the power which a mob have arrayed with a view of destroying
property or endangering the persons or lives of unoffending citizens.”
In riotous assemblies, all who are present and not actually assistant in their sup-
pression, in the first instance, are, in presumption of law, participants; and the
obligation is cast upon a person so circumstanced, to prove his actual non-inter-
ference. When, however, the sheriff of a county, or other known public conservator
of the peace, has repaired to the scene of tumult, and there commanded the dis-
persion of the riotous assembly, and demanded the assistance of those present to
aid in its suppression, from that instant there can be no neutrals. The line is then
drawn between those who are for, and those who are against the maintenance
of order, and with the one or the other, all who see fit to remain, must promptly
arrange themselves. Those who continue looking on, while the active rioters are
resisting the public authorities, are just as much rioters as those most active in
the work of violence.?
It has been held, that if a justice of the peace find persons riotously assembled,
he alone hath not only power to arrest the offenders, and bind them to their good
behavior, or imprison them if they do not offer good bail, but that he may also
authorize others to arrest them by a bare parol command, without other warrant;
and that by force thereof the persons so commanded may pursue and arrest the
offenders, in his absence, as well as presence.®
1 This act only extends to the city of Philadel- 22 Clark 280. 1 Brewst. 312.
phia and the county of Allegheny. Purd. 1869. 81 Y.419. 2 Clark 282.
See acts 3 May 1850, 2 February 1854 andl
Sana 1225. Pura. 1287-8.
828 ROADS AND HIGHWAYS.
Aor 13 May 1887. Purd. 1584.
Sxcr. 67. When an invasion of or insurrection in the state is made or threatened, or
a tumult, riot or mob shall exist, the commander-in-chief shall call upon the national
guard, and, at his discretion, upon the enrolled militia, to repel or suppress the same,
and may order out divisions, brigades, regiments, battalions or companies, or May
order to be detached parts or companies thereof, or any number of men to be drafted
therefrom, and may cause officers to be detailed, sufficient with those attached to the
troops, to organize the forces.
IV. WaRRANT TO ARREST RIOTERS.
COUNTY OF BERKS, ss.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To any Constable of the said county, greeting : i
Wuereas, complaint has this day been made before me, the subscriber, J. R., one of
the justices of the peace in and for the said county, upon the oaths of F.C. and J. M..
that on the 8th day of June, instant, C. D., B. F. and G. H., with others unknown, did
riotously assemble together, in the town of Reading, with clubs, sticks and stones, and
then and there break into the house of the said F. C. and destroy his furniture and win-
dows, to his great damage, and to the great terror of the peaceable citizens of the said
place, contrary to the act of assembly in such case made and provided. These are there-
fore to command you, forthwith to apprehend the said C. D., E. F. and G. H., and bring
them before me, the said J. R., to answer urto the said complaint, and-to be further dealt
with according to law. Witness the said J. R., who hath hereunto set his hand and seal,
the ninth day of June, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and at
J. R., Justice of the Peace. [szat.
Roads and Highways,
[See Bicycuzs. ]
A TRAVELLER may use the middle or either side of a public road, at his pleasure,
and is not bound to turn aside for another travelling in the same direction, provided
there be convenient room to pass on the one side or the other. If there be not con-
venient room.to pass, it is, doubtless, the duty of the other to afford it, on request
made, by yielding him an equal share of the road, if that be adequate and practi-
cable ; if not, the object must be deferred till the parties arrive at ground more
favorable to its accomplishment. Should the leading traveller refuse to comply, he
would be answerable for it, in due course of law; but the other has no right to
effect the passage by a forcible collision. Evidence of a custom for the leading
carriage to incline to the right, the other making the transit at the same time to the
left, held not to control the general law in this case. Coaches carrying the mail of
the United States are protected by the act of congress from being wilfully and
wantonly obstructed or delayed, but in every other respect they are on a footing with
all other carriages.”
The driver of a team which is on the left-hand side of a street, in violation of the
law of the road, may nevertheless recover damages for an injury sustained by him
from a collision with another team, the driver of which, in meeting him, carelessly
or recklessly runs against him or his team.?
A traveller on horseback meeting another horseman or a vehicle, is not required
to turn in any particular way to avoid collision; he must exercise due care under
the circumstances,® Jt seems, it is ordinarily the duty of one on horseback to yield
the travelled path to one in a vehicle.*
It is the general custom in this country, for persons meeting on a highway to pass
to the right, but when a horseman or light carriage meets a heavily laden team, and
can pass with safety to the left, it is his duty to give way, and leave the choice
of the road to the more unwieldy vehicle.
The principle that a footman or horseman cannot compel a teamster who has a
heavy load, to turn out of the beaten track of the road, if there be sufficient room
11 W. 360. 4 2 Chipm. 136.
2 3 Allen 176. oe OS
8 24 Wend. 465.
ROADS AND HIGHWAYS. 829
for the former to pass, is applicable to the case of a light wagon or carriage with a
heavy draught.’
A horseman meeting a city railway car, must turn out soon enough to allow the
car to pass without impediment.?
All persons have a right to walk in a public highway, and are entitled to the
exercise of reasonable care of persons driving carriages along it. Lord Denman
says: ‘‘A man has a right to walk in the road if he pleases; it isa way for foot
passengers as well as carriages.’
It is quite clear, that a foot passenger has a right to cross a highway, and that
persons driving carriages are liable if they do not take care, so as to avoid driving
against the foot passengers who are crossing the road ; and if a person driving along
the-road, cannot pull up because his reins break, that will be no ground of defence,
because he is bound to have proper tackle.* This right of the foot passenger, how-
ever, does not exempt him from due care on his part. Thus, if a person in a public
street in a city, see an omnibus crossing, however furiously, and he will be head-
strong enough to try to cross the street, and is run over, he cannot recover in an
action against the proprietors of the omnibus, as no one has a right of action if
he meet with an accident which, by ordinary care, he might have avoided.
Where the plaintiff, who was walking in the middle of the street, instead of the
footway, was injured by a sleigh driven rapidly by the defendant, it was held to be
a question for the jury whether, under all the circumstances, the plaintiff was
chargeable with negligence, having left the sidewalk, in not looking behind as well
as before, to avoid contract with persons riding or driving in the middle of the
street ; and that if he was, the defendant would be answerable only for negligence
g0 wanton and gross as to be evidence of voluntary injury.®
A traveller on a highway, when approaching its intersection with a railroad is
bound to look out for approaching trains, and if he fail to do so, is guilty of negli- |
ence.”
If the driver of a vehicle, in passing through the streets of a crowded city, injure
one lawfully on the highway, and did not use due care and precaution, he is liable
criminally therefor.®
In all cases where sidewalks have been constructed in unincorporated towns and
villages, or upon any public road, it shall not be lawful for any person to ride, lead
or drive any beast of burden thereon ; and if any person shall wilfully ride, lead or
drive, or cause to be driven, any beast of burden thereon, such person shall, for
every offence, forfeit and pay a sum of not less than five, nor more than ten dollars,
to be sued for and recovered as fines and pecuniary penalties are recovered under
the provisions of the 75th section of the act of June 13th, 1836, entitled “ an act
relating to roads, highways and bridges :” Provided, That this act shall not apply
to any person leading, riding or driving any beast of burden over or on any side-
walk constructed upon or abutting on his own property.®
1 23 Penn. St. 196. 65 W.&S. 524.
2 4 Phila, 24. 7 49 Penn. St. 60.
850. & P. 407. 8 Com. v. Cox, Q. S. Phila. 1850, King, P. J,
4 8 Ibid. 691. 9 Act 6 April 1868. Purd. 1890. :
5 Ibid. 373. And seo 45 N. Y. 191.
L 830 ]
Robbery.
I. Provisions of the Penal Code. for robbery—confession of a robber, and a
II. Judicial authorities, &e. commitment for robbery.
II. Examination of a person robbed—a warrant
I. Aor 31 Marcu 1860. Purd 537.
Szor. 100. If any person, being armed with an offensive weapon or instrument,
shall rob, or assault, with intent to rob, another, or shall, together with one or more
person or persons, rob, or assault, with intent to rob, or shall rob any person, and at
the same time, or immediately before, or immediately after, such robbery, beat, strike
or ill-use any person, or do violence to such person, the person so offending shall
be guilty of felony, and, being thereof convicted, shall be sentenced to pay a fine
not exceeding one thousand dollars, and undergo an imprisonment, by separate or
solitary confinement, at labor, not exceeding ten years.
Secor. 101. If any one shall accuse any person of the abominable crime of sodomy
or buggery, committed either with man or beast, or of any assault, with intent to
commit such abominable crime, or any attempt or endeavor to commit the same, or
of making or offering any solicitation, persuasion, promise or threat to any person,
whereby to move or induce such person to commit or permit such abominable crime,
with a view and intent, in any of the cases aforesaid, to extort or gain from such
person, and shall, by intimidating such person by such accusation or threat, extort
or gain from such person any money or property, the person so offending shall be
deemed guilty of felony, and, being thereof convicted, shall be sentenced to pay a
fine not exceeding one thousand dollars, and to undergo an imprisonment by separate
or solitary confinement, at labor, not exceeding ten years.
Seor. 102. If any person shall rob another, or shall steal any property from the
person of another, or shall assault any person, with intent to rob him, or shall, by
menaces or by force, demand any property of another, with intent to steal the same,
such person shall be guilty of felony, and, being convicted thereof, shall be sen-
tenced to pay a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars, and to undergo an imprison-
ment, by separate or solitary confinement, not exceeding five years.
Szor. 179. On all convictions for robbery, burglary or larceny of any goods,
chattels or other property, made the subject of larceny by the laws of this common-
wealth, or for otherwise unlawfully and fraudulently taking or obtaining the same,
or of receiving such goods, chattels or other property, knowing the same to be
stolen, the defendant shall, in addition to the punishment heretofore prescribed
for such offences, be adjudged to restore to the owner the property taken, or to pay
the value of the same or so much thereof as may not be restored. And on all
convictions on avy indictments for forgery, for uttering, publishing or passing any
forged or counterfeit coin, bank-notes, check or writing, or any indictment for
fraudulently, by means of false tokens or pretences, or otherwise, cheating and
defrauding another of his goods, chattels or other property, the defendant, in addi-
tion to the punishment hereinbefore prescribed for such offences, shall be adjudged
to make similar restitution, or other compensation, as in case of larceny, to the per-
son defrauded : Provided, That nothing hereia shall be so construed as to prevent
the party aggrieved, and to whom restitution is to be awarded, from being a compe-
tent witness on the trial of the offender.'
Aor 8 May 1876. Purd 537.
Seor. 1. If any person shall by fraud, force, threats or menaces, or by seizing,
gagging or tying, compel, or attempt to compel, another to surrender the key or
other appliance, or to divulge the combination, secret or other means used to open
any bank, vault, safe or other depository of money, securities or property, or if any
person shall administer, or attempt to administer, to another, any stupefying or
overpowering drug, matter or thing, for the purpose of enabling such offender to.
obtain such key or other appliance, with intent, in any of the cases aforesaid,
1 Purd. 562.
ROBBERY. 831
to steal such money, securities or property, or any portion thereof, every such offender
shall be guilty of a felony ; and being thereof convicted, shall be sentenced to pay
a fine not exceeding ten thousand dollars, and to undergo imprisonment, at hard
labor, not exceeding twenty years.
Il. Robbery from the person, which is a felony at common law, is thus defined :
a felonious taking of money or goods of any value from the person of another, or
in his presence, against his will, by violence or putting him in fear.!
It must be proved that some property was taken, for an assault with intent to
rob is an offence of a different and inferior nature ;? but the value of the property
is immaterial ; a penny as well as a pound forcibly extorted constitutes a robbery;
the gist of the offence being the force and terror. In the following case, it was
held, that there was no property in the prosecutor so as to support an indictment for
robbery. The prisoner was charged with robbing the prosecutor of a promissory
note. It appeared that the prosecutor had been decoyed by the prisoner into a
room for the purpose of extorting money from him. Upon a table covered with
black silk were two candlesticks, covered also with black, a pair of large horse-
pistols ready cocked, a tumbler glass filled with gunpowder, a saucer with leaden
balls, two knives, one of them a prodigiously large carving-knife, their handles
wrapped in black crape, pens and inkstands, several sheets of paper and two ropes.
The prisoner, Mrs. Phipoe, seizing the carving-knife and threatening to take away
the prosecutor’s life, the latter was compelled to sign a promissory note for £2000
upon a piece of stamped paper, which had been provided by the prisoner. It was
objected, that there was no property in the prosecutor, and the point being reserved
for the opinion of the judges, they held accordingly. They said, that it was essen-
tial to larceny that the property stolen should be of some value, and that the note
in this case did not on the face of it import either a general or special property in
the prosecutor, and that it was so far from being of any or the least value to him,
that he had not even the property of the paper on which it was written, for it
appearing that both the paper and ink were the property of Mrs. Phipoe, and the
delivering of it by her to him could not, under the circumstances of the case, be
considered as vesting in him; but if it had, as it was a property of which he was
never even for an instant in the peaceable possession, it could not be considered as
property taken from his person ; and it was well settled, that to constitute the crime
of robbery, the property must not only be valuable, but it must also be taken from
the person and peaceable possession of the owner.
In order to constitute a taking, there must be a possession by the robber. There-
fore, if a man has his purse fastened to his girdle, and a thief cut the, girdle,
whereby the purse falls to the ground, that is not taking of the purse, for the thief
never had it in his possession. But if the thief had taken up the purse from the
ground, and afterwards let it fall in the struggle, without taking it up again, it
would have been robbery, for it would have been once in his possession.* However
short the period of possession, it is sufficient.°
III. EXAMINATION OF A PERSON ROBBED.
LYCOMING COUNTY, ss.
Tue examination of A. B., of Williamsport, in the county of Lycoming, taken on oath
before J. B., one of the justices of the peace in and for the said county, who deposeth and
saith, that on the first of May inst., he was knocked down on the highway leading from
Williamsport to Loyalsock creek by two men, the one a tall slender man, of a dark com-
plexion, in a light drab-colored frock-coat, and the other # small thick man, below the
common size, and his face much scarred with the small-pox, who dragged him into a piece
of wood adjoining the road, and robbed him of two golden eagles, six silver dollars, some
small silver, &c. He further saith, that the persons who committed the said robbery are
unknown to him. . (Signed) A. B.
Sworn and subscribed, May 3d, 1880, before J. R., Justice of the Peace.
1 P. C. 707. 4 1 Hale H. P. OC. 533.
a Sn mee 5 Roscoe Cr. Evid. 732.
8 2 Leach C. 0. 673, 2 Hast P. C. 599
832 ROBBERY.
A WARRANT FOR ROBBERY.
LYCOMING COUNTY, ss.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To any Constable of said county, greeting: .
You are hereby commanded to take the bodies of two men, one a tall, slender white
man, in a light drab-colored frock-coat, light trowsers, and a black beaver hat, and the
other a small, thick, white man, in a snuff-colored roundabout, drab-colored pantaloons,
half-boots, and a drab-colored hat, each of them wearing a light-red bandanna silk hand-
kerchief tied loosely round his neck, if they, or either of them, be found in the said
county, and bring him or them before J. R., one of our justices of the peace in and for
the said county, to answer the commonwealth upon a charge, founded on the oath of A. B.,
of having robbed him, on the highway, of some gold and silver coin, and other articles,
on the first day of May inst., and further to be dealt with according to law. And for so
doing this shall be your warrant. Witness the said J. R., who hath hereunto set his .
hand and seal, the second day of May, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred
and eighty. J. R., Justice of the Peace. [szat.|
CONFESSION OF A ROBBER.
LYCOMING COUNTY, ss.
Tux voluntary confession of J. S., taken before J. R., one of the justices of the peace,
in and for the said county, May 3d, a. p. 1880. The said J. S. being apprehended on
suspicion of having committed a robbery upon the person of A. B., of Williamsport,
in said county, doth of his own free will and accord confess and declare, that on the
great road between Williamsport and Loyalsock creek, he, together with a certain J. F.,
robbed the said A. B. of two golden eagles, some silver dollars, and some other money in
silver. And further saith not. (Signed) J.
Taken and subscribed, May 3d, a. p. 1880, before J. R., Justice of the Peace.
A COMMITMENT FOR ROBBERY.
LYCOMING COUNTY, ss.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To any Constable of the said county, and to the keeper of the prison of the said county
of Lycoming, greeting:
THESE are to authorize and require you, the said constable, forthwith to convey and
deliver into the custody of the keeper of the said prison, the body of J. S., charged on his
own confession and on oath before J. R:, one of our justices of the peace of the said
county, with having within the said county, in company with a certain J. F., robbed
A. B. on the highway, in the said county, of some gold and silver coin and other articles;
and you, the said keeper, are hereby required to receive the said J. S. into your custody in
the said prison, and him there safely to keep till the next court of oyer and terminer
of the said county of Lycoming, or until he shall thence be delivered by due course of
law. And for so doing this shall be your sufficient warrant. Witness the said J. R., at
Williamsport, who hath hereunto set his hand and seal, the third day of May, Anno
Domini 1880. J. R., Justice of the Peace. [szau.]
[ 833 ]
Sale of Meal Estate,
I. Of the nature and requisites of a deed. II. What passes by a sale of land.
I. WueErs, in a deed, the land sold is said to contain “ about so many acres,”
both the grantor and grantee consider these words as a representation of the quan-
tity which the grantor expects to sell and the grantee to purchase. The words
“more or less”’ are intended to cover a reasonable excess or deficit.
Where land has been sold for a gross sum, and the deed of conveyance describes
it truly, by courses and distances, but the quantity of acres said to be conveyed falls
short, and there is no express covenant insuring such quantity, the vendee cannot
maintain covenant to recover damages.? ;
The relation of buyer and seller is not a confidential one, and each party: is sup-
posed to judge of his own ability to perform his part for himself.2 One who bar-
gains for a good title is not bound to pay the purchase-money upon a tender to him
of a defective or doubtful one.* He who purchases land knowing the title to be
defective, takes the whole risk upon himself of losing all his outlays.® No title
passes to a vendee who is guilty of fraud in procuring it, whether the sale be
private or judicial®
The purchaser of a fraudulent title must be able to show clearly that he is a
bond fide purchaser, without notice, and that he has actually paid the purchase-
money, of which, however, the receipt of the vendor will not be sufficient.”
One who has offered his advice and assistance to another in the sale of land, will
not be permitted to avail himself of the purchase of it, if obtained upon a mis-
representation of its value.®
By act of assembly, grantees of real estate which is subject to ground-rent, or
bound by mortgage or other incumbrance, shall not be personally liable for the pay-
ment of such ground-rent, mortgage or other incumbrance, unlesss he shall, by an
agreement in writing, have expressly assumed a personal liability therefor, or there
shall be express words in the deed of conveyance, stating that the grant is made on
condition of the grantee assuming such personal liability : and the use of the words
“under and subject to the payment of such ground-rent, mortgage or other incum-
brance,” shall not alone be so construed as to make such grantee personally liable
as aforesaid; and the right to enforce such personal liability shall not inure to any
person other than the person with whom such an agreement is made, nor shall such
personal liability continue, after the said grantee has bond fide parted with the incum-
bered property, unless he shall have expressly assumed such continuing liability.
II. WHAT PASSES BY sa SALE OF LAND.
The rolls of an iron rolling-mill, as well as the iron plates with which the floor
of such mill is covered, and which are an indispensable part of it, though not manu-
factured for that purpose, are part of the realty, and pass by a sale of the mill.”
The criterion of fixture in a mansion-house is actual and permanent fastening to the
freehold, but this is not a criterion of a fixture in a manufactory or mill." Machiner
which is a constituent part of the manufactory, to the purpose for which the build-
ing has been adapted, and without which it would cease to be such a manufactory, is
part of the freehold, and passes with it, though it be not actually fastened to it.”
A conveyance of land conveys the grain growing upon it to the purchaser, and
no care of it on the part of the vendee can alter the rights of the parties.”
The rule that a purchaser of land buys all that is growing on or issuing out of
a a a to the seller, unless specially accepted, applies to lands sold at a sheriff’s
sale.*
1 Pet. C. C. 49, 58. applies to future cases; it has no retrospective
26 Binn. 100. 68. & R. 488. operation. 99 Penn. St. 78. For the decisions
8 10 W. 110. under the law, see Bright. Dig. 461, 2295-3.
4 Thid. 413. 10 2 W. & S. 390.
5 6 Ibid. 87. 1 Thid. 116.
6 7 Thid. 86. 12 [Tbid. 15 Penn. St. 507.
7 9 Ibid. 183. 5 Penn. St. 145. 13 43 Penn. St. 378.
87 W. 386. 14 37 Ibid. 134.
® Act 12 June 1878. Purd. 1837. This act only
[ 834 J
Sale of Personal Property.
I. The requisites of a valid sale. III. Of warranty and fraud.
II. Of the change of property and of delivery.
I, A SALE is a transfer of chattels from one person to another for a valuable
consideration, and three things are requisite to its validity, viz., the thing sold,
which is the object of the contract, the price, and the consent of the contracting
parties. The thing sold must have an actual or potential existence to render the
contract valid. If A. sells his horse to B. and it turns out that the horse was dead
at the time, though the fact was unknown to the parties, the contract is necessarily
void."
A sale is an executed contract; it vests the property in the thing sold in the
buyer, and the right to the price in the seller; but when the contract remains
executory, there is no sale. It is a condition precedent of a sale for cash, in order
to pass the property to the vendee, that payment should be made; clearly so, unless
there has been a delivery; until that is done, the sale is not consummated; the
buyer cannot sue for the goods, nor the seller for the price. Yet, even if the con--
tract be for a cash sale, if the thing agreed to be sold, be delivered without payment,
the property passes to the vendee; the right of the vendee is converted into a
mere chose in action.
A sale of personal property invests even a bond fide purchaser with no more than
the title the vendor had : the exceptions are—1st, money, checks, notes, &c., termed
currency, which pass by delivery only ; 2d, where the true owner confers on the
party selling to a bond fide vendee, the apparent right of property, or of disposal
as agent.
II. Or CHANGE OF PROPERTY AND OF DELIVERY.
When the terms of sale are agreed on, and the bargain is struck, and everything
that the seller has to do with the goods is complete, the property and the risk of
accident to the goods vests in the buyer, even before delivery or payment; the
buyer is entitled to the goods on payment or tender of the price, and not otherwise,
when nothing is said at the sale as to the time of delivery or the time of payment.
But if the goods aresold upon credit, and nothing is agreed upon as to the time of
delivering the goods, the vendee is immediately entitled to the possession, and the
right of possession and the right of property vests at once in him.*
If the vendor rely on the promise of the vendee to perform the conditions of sale,
and deliver the goods accordingly, the right of property is changed, although the
conditions be not performed; but where performance and delivery are understood
by the parties to be simultaneous, possession obtained by artifice and deceit will not
change the property. If one sell goods for cash, and the vendee take them away
without payment of the money, the vendor should immediately reclaim them, by
pursuing the party; and he may justify the retaking of them by force.®
If a man sell his goods to another, the property vests in the vendee, though he
suffer them to be in the possession of the vendor. A sale of goods is complete
upon an order to a wharfinger (or porter) to deliver, communicated and assented to
by him.’ :
Where, on the sale of a chattel, the purchase-money is paid, the property is
vested in the vendee, and if he permit it to remain in the custody of the vendor,
he cannot call upon the latter for any subsequent loss or deterioration not arising
from negligence.® i
When goods are sold, if nothing remains to be done on the part of the seller, as
: 2 Kent’s ae 367. 367, 559. 6 Exch. 67.
32 Pona. St. 17. 6 1 Y¥. 520. 13 Penn. St. 146. See 34 Leg. .
8 12 Ibid. 229. 321, me ni tat
« 2 Kent’s Com. 387-8, T Com. Dig. 24 Penn. St. 521. 2 W. N. 0, 228.
63S GK. 20. 3 Phila. 47. Seo 21 Penn. St. 8 3 Johns. 13.
SALE OF PERSONAL PROPERTY. 835
between him and the buyer, the article is to be delivered ; the property has passed.)
But even though a part of the price be paid, if the quantity remain to be ascer-
tained, and there be no actual delivery, the property does not pass to the buyer.’
So long as anything remains to be done between the vendor and vendee, for the pur-
pose of ascertaining the amount or price of the article sold, the property remains in
the vendor?
On a contract for the sale of goods, the vendor, if the goods are bulky, must give
notice to the buyer that he is ready to deliver them, and on the vendee failing to
take them away, the vendor may, on due notice, sell them at public auction, and
charge the vendee with the difference of price.‘
A delivery of the key of a warehouse, in which goods sold are deposited, is a
sufficient delivery of the goods to transfer the property.’ A delivery of the receipt
of the store-keeper, for the goods kept in his store, being documentary evidence of
the title, is tantamount to a delivery of the goods.
On a sale of personal property, if possession remain in the vendor, and he sell to
a bona fide purchaser who is ignorant of the previous sale, the second purchaser
will be entitled to hold the property as against the first.”
An agreement to sell a chattel which is in an unfinished state, to be delivered at
a future time, when finished, is an executory contract, upon which a present property
does not pass, though an action will lie for a breach of the agreement.®
_ Atransfer of personal property, unaccompanied by a corresponding change of
possession, is void as against creditors® But if the sale be not fraudulent in fact,
it is sufficient, if there be such a change of possession as usually attends a transaction
of the sort.
If the property assigned be susceptible of actual delivery, a symbolical delivery
will not suffice." But where the subject-matter of the sale is not reasonably capable
of an actual delivery, a constructive delivery will be sufficient ; in such case, it is
only necessary that the vendee should assume such control of the subject, as reason-
ably to indicate the change of possession.” A concurrent possession, however, in
the vendor and vendee is not sufficient; the change of possession must be both
actual and continued.¥ j
Where no time is fixed for the delivery of goods sold, the law makes them deliver-
able in a reasonable time; if, when a demand is made, there be no objection made
as to time, or were it not then made a question by the vendor, the contract will be
deemed broken by a refusal.*
In order to make a transfer of personal property available against creditors, or a
subsequent assignor, it must be accompanied by a change of possession at the time,
or within a reasonable time thereafter. If it have been delayed an unreasonable
time, it is not sufficient, that the possession was changed before a levy made.”
In order to vest a title in goods purchased, it is necessary that they should have
been separated from the bulk of the other goods, and possession should be delivered
with as little delay as is consistent with the nature of the articles bought, other-
wise the transaction is fraudulent as to creditors, and the goods may be taken in
execution as the property of the vendor.® Where one agrees to deliver to another
eorn in sacks, furnished by the latter for that purpose, at a designated point, upon
the arrival of the grain at the designated place, the property is vested in the pur-
chaser, and the title of the vendor is completely divested.”
To constitute a valid assignment of personal property against a judgment creditor,
there must be a delivery to, accompanied and followed by a continuing possession in,
the assignee.”® ; j :
A party purchasing with notice that the sale is a breach of trust, is particeps
1 14 Johns. 167. 3 Penn. St. 50. 116.
225 Penn: St. 208. iss 12 64 Penn. St. 352. And see 59 Ibid. 464. 63
8 27 Ibid. 128. 18 Ibid. 91. 31 Ibid. 128. Ibid. 59. 74 Ibid. 296.
‘ 2s & R. 19. ; 132 W.&8.147. 43 Penn. St. 104. 69 Ibid.
5 1Y.529. 5 Johns 335. 134, 11 W.N. C. 136.
6 5 Johns. 335. 14 Bald. 331.
T178. & BR. 99. 16 5 W. 483.
848.260. 4 W.121. 5 Ibid. 201. 16 6 Ibid. 29. 15 Penn. St. 528.
96 W. 126. 17 29 Penn. St. 356.
10 24 Penn. St. 9. 26 Ibid. 72. ; 182 W.& S. 147.
1108. &R.201. 64 Penn. St. 352. 4 Phila.
836 SALE OF PERSONAL PROPERTY.
criminis, and cannot protect himself against the owner, not being a bond fide pur-
chaser.’
III. WARRANTY AND FRAUD IN THE SALE OF CHATTELS.
In every sale of a chattel, as one’s own property, if the possession be, at the time,
in another, and there be no covenant or warranty of title, the rule of caveat emptor
[let the purchaser beware] applies, and the party buys at his peril. But if the
seller have possession of the article, and he sell it as his own property, he is under-
stood to warrant the title? A fair price implies a warranty of title, and the pur-
chaser may have a satisfaction from the seller, if he sell the goods as his own and
the title proves deficient. But with regard to the quality or goodness of the articles
sold, the seller is not bound to answer, except under special circumstances, unless
he expressly warranted the goods to be sound and good, or unless he hath made a
fraudulent representation concerning them. This distinction between the respon-
sibility of the seller as to the ¢itle and as to the quality of goods sold, is well estab-
lished in the English and American law.’ ;
It is well settled, that with regard to the guality of goods, the vendor is not
answerable, unless he expressly warrant them, or there has been a fraudulent
representation ; an affirmation of a quality known to the vendor to be false. To
constitute an express warranty, it is not necessary that the word “ warrant” should
be used ; but the words used must be tantamount, and not dubious or equivocal. An
assertion by the vendor to the vendee, at the time of selling a mare, that “he is
sure she is perfectly safe, kind and gentle in harness,’ does not amount to an
express promise or warranty, so as to render the vendor liable in assumpsit, although
if made with a knowledge of its falsehood, it would be the subject of an action of
deceit.*
An advertisement of property for sale, which gives it a higher character than it
deserves, does not amount to a warranty as to the quality, if the purchaser rely
upon his own examination.®
Tf one sell a horse to another, knowing a material defect, which in equity and
good conscience he ought to disclose, but do uot disclose it, and it be not known to
the buyer, or such as a buyer of common prudence must be presumed to know, this
is such a fraud as vitiates the contract, and the buyer may recover back the price.®
If one sell an unsound horse knowingly, and conceal the circumstance from the
purchaser, and receive a sound price, he is liable in damages to the vendee ; other-
wise, if he were ignorant that the horse was unsound. But if one sell a horse,
warranting him to be sound, he is answerable, whether he knew the horse to be
unsound or not.”
In all sales of goods, there is an implied warranty that the article corresponds in
specie with the commodity sold, unless there be circumstances (of which the jury,
under the direction of the court, are to judge) to show that the purchaser took upon
himself the risk of determining not only the quality of the goods, but the kind he
purchased. Wherefore, if the defendant sell, and the plaintiff purchase, an article
as “blue paint,” and it is so described in the bill of particulars, this amounts to a
warranty that the article delivered shall be blue pacnt, and not a different article?
A sample or description in a sale-note, advertisement, bill of parcels or invoice,
is equivalent to an express warranty that the goods are what they are described or
represented to be by the vendor.®
In order to sustain an action on an implied warranty, in a contract for the sale of
goods, it is not necessary that the plaintiff should, before bringing suit, tender or
redeliver the articles to the defendant. The measure of damages in such cases
is a difference between the value of the articles delivered and the commodity
sold.
Though the seller is answerable to the buyer that the article sold shall be in
specie, the thing for which it was sold, yet if there be only a partial adulteration,
which does not destroy the distinctive character of the thing, the buyer is bound
1 29 Penn. St. 154 8 Add. 322,
21W.&S8. 513. T3 Y. 262. Lofft 146. 2 0..% P. 540.
8 2 Kent’s Com, 374, 8 3.R. 23. 7 Penn. St. 293.
4758. & R. 482. 37 Penn. St. 147. 93 R. 37. 2 Sandf. 89.
23 W.C. C. 165. 10 3 RK. 23.
SALE OF PERSONAL PROPERTY. 837
by his bargain; and in doubtful cases, there is perhaps no practical test but that
of its being merchantable under the denomination affixed to it by the seller.
No. implied warranty arises from an unfounded affirmation of soundness in the
sale of a chattel, but for a deceitful representation of it, the remedy is by action ex
delicto. i
If the sale of a chattel be absolute, with a warranty of soundness, and there be
no consent by the vendor to take it back, the vendee cannot rescind the contract,
but is put to his action on the warranty, unless the vendor knew of its unsoundness,
and the vendee gave him reasonable notice of it.
A sale by sample, without more, is not a warranty of quality; it merely imports
that the goods to be delivered shall follow its kind, and that they shall be mer-
chantable.*
To avoid a contract on the ground of fraud, there must be the concealment of
something which the purchaser is bound to communicate, or some misrepresentation
on a material matter to the contract, which either does or is calculated to mislead
or deceive him.®
A sale and transfer of personal property, made for the purpose of preventing a
ereditor from obtaining execution of his judgment, is mald fide, and void against
such creditor. And the party claiming against such creditor is bound to remove
all doubt of the fairness of the transaction, even if possession have accompanied the
transfer.§
The sale of an unsound horse, without fraud or warranty, though known to be
unsound by the seller, is no defence to an action for the purchase-money.”
Mere inadequacy of consideration, without warranty or fraud, is no defence to
the payment of a note given for the purchase-money of goods; the unsoundness
of the article sold amounts neither to want or failure of consideration. In the
absence of an agreement by the seller, the purchaser takes at his own risk as to
quality ; the vendor of a chattel warrants the title, and in some cases the species,
but nothing more.®
A bona fide purchaser of a chattel, for a valuable consideration, and without
notice, from a fraudulent vendee, takes a title clear of the fraud, whether it be
actual or legal.®
In a mercantile contract, a statement descriptive of the subject-matter, or of
some material incident, such as the time and place of shipment, is ordinarily to be
regarded as a warranty, or condition precedent, upon the failure or non-performance
of which, the party aggrieved may repudiate the whole contract.
13 R. 168, 6 2 Whart. 302.
29W.58. 37 Penn. St. 147. 7 2 Clark 141.
316 W. 107. 8 34 Penn. St. 236.
* 83 Penn. St. 319. 6 W.N.0. 271. 38 Leg 9 40 Ibid. 417.
Tat. 311. .- 20 115 U. S. 188, 213, and cases cited.
5 Bald. 337.
[ 838 ]
Scire facias.
I. Judicial decisions relating to scire facias. II. Form of a scire facias to show cause why exe-
cution should not issue.
A SOIRE FAOIAS, in our practice, is a writ usually founded on some matter of
record, as a recognisance, judgment, or a mortgage, by act of assembly, though not
a record, requiring the person against whom it issues to show cause why the plain-
tiff should not have advantage of such record, although in some respects considered
as a new action, because the defendant may plead thereto, and because a release of
all actions or executions is a discharge to it.1 Yet, in general, it is a judicial writ,
which, from its form, and the nature of the proceedings under it, must issue from
the court [or justice] where the record remains.’ : :
Where the object of the scire facias is to obtain execution on a judgment or
recognisance, &c., it is called a writ of execution. When issued against bail, on a
mortgage, or the like, it is, in fact, an original proceeding; but when issued to
revive a judgment, or upon the death, marriage, &c., of parties; or on a judg-
ment in debt or bond, or on a judgment quando, &c., against an executor, it is but
a continuation of the original action. In some cases, it is merely an interlocutory
proceeding, and in the nature of process ; as in the case of a scire facias quare exe-
cutionem non?
No execution shall be issued on a judgment rendered before a justice of the peace
or alderman, after five years from the rendition of such judgment, unless the same
shall have been revived by scire facias, or amicable confession.‘
A seire facias to revive a judgment of a justice, of which a transcript has been
filed in the common pleas, agreeable to the act of 1810, must be issued from the
common pleas, and not by the justice.’ Buta justice may issue a scire facias on a
certified transcript of another magistrate,® and upon the judgment of another
justice whose commission has expired.’
A scire facias against two or more must issue against all the defendants; the
plaintiff cannot drop one and go against the others.* But a justice of the peace
may issue a scire facias as well to introduce new parties as to enforce a recognisance
of bail.®
If one recover a judgment against a single woman and she marry, a scire facias
must issue against her husband and her, before an execution shall issue. In like
manner, if a single woman be plaintiff, and marry after obtaining judgment, a
scire facias must issue in the name of her husband and self, previously to an exe-
cution.”
An appeal lies from the judgment of a justice of the peace upon a scire facias."
Where bail for stay of execution reside in another county or city, the scire facias
against such bail must be issued by an alderman or justice having jurisdiction within
the city or county where the bail himself resides.”
II. Form oF A SCIRE FACIAS, TO BE SERVED ON A DEFENDANT BEFORE ISSUING
AN EXECUTION, WHERE THE JUDGMENT HAS BEEN RENDERED FIVE YEARS BE
PORE ISSUING EXECUTION.
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ss.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To the Constable of the Highth ward, or to the next constable of the said city, most con-
venient to the defendant, greeting :
Wuerzas, —— on the —— day of —— 187—, [X. Y.] obtained judgment efore the sub-
scriber, J. B., one of the magistrates of the said city, against A. B., for th: sum of ——,
12P.& W. 265. ? 6 Phila, 332.
268. & R. 574. 8 4 Whart. 344.
82P. & W. 265. ® 5 Binn. 56.
4 Act 5 May 1854. Purd.1145. 10 Grayd. Just. 418,
58S. & R. 479. u3S. & R. 93.
6 14 Luz. L. Reg. 491. 123 Clark 410.
SEAL. 839
debt and —— costs. And whereas, execution of the said judgment still remains to be
made. Therefore, you are hereby commanded to make known to the said [A. B.] that he
be and appear before our said magistrate, at his office, No. 36 South Sixth street, on the
—— day of - 1880, between the hours of eight and nine o’clock in the forenoon, to’
show cause, if anything he knows, or hath to say, why the said [X. Y.] should not have
execution against him of the aforesaid debt and costs, according to the form of the said
recovery. Witness our said magistrate, at Philadelphia, who hath hereunto set his hand
and seal, this —— day of ——, Anno Domini 1880.
J. B., Magistrate. [sma.]
For the form of a scire facias against bail for stay of execution, see tit, “ Baru.”
eet Yk
Seal,
THE common law intended, by a seal, an impression upon wax or wafer, or some
other tenacious substance capable of being impressed. According to Lord Coke, a
seal is wax, with an impression. In the eastern states, sealing, in the common law
sense, is requisite ; but in the southern and western states, from New Jersey inclu-
sive, the impression upon wax has been disused to such an extent as to induce the
courts to allow (but with certain qualifications in some of the states) a flourish with
the pen, at the end of the name, or a circle of ink or scroll, to be a valid substitute
for a seal.
In public and notarial instruments, the seal or impression is usually made on the
paper, and with such force as to give tenacity to the impression, and to leave
the character of the seal upon it.2, In Pennsylvania, a written or ink seal or scroll
is sufficient.®
Whether an instrument of writing be under seal or not, is a question of law to.
be determined by the court from the inspection of the instrument itself; and ought
not to be submitted to the jury.* A state seal proves itself without the attestation
of a public officer.
If a written agreement be under seal, it is called a specialty. The act of limita.
tions does not include instruments under seal, but the law will presume payment
after the lapse of twenty years, unless the presumption be repelled by evidence.§
Where the written obligation of two parties, which concluded with the words
‘“‘ witness our hands and seals,” had but one seal, which was affixed to his name by
the person who drew and first executed the same, and nearly opposite to this seal the
other party signed his name; it was held, that the obligation, on its face, furnished
intrinsic evidence, that the party last signing it had adopted the seal as it stood
upon the paper.”
Act 12 Marcy 1869. Purd 1125.
Sror. 1. Every alderman in the cities of Philadelphia and Lancaster shall be
provided with a public aldermanic seal, with which he shall authenticate all his
acts, instruments and attestations ; on which seal shall be engraved the arms of this
commonwealth and shall have, for legend, the name, surname and office of the
alderman using the same, and the place of his residence.
Szor. 2. The official acts of the aldermen in and for the cities aforesaid, certified
to under their respective hands and official seals, shall and may be received and
read in evidence of the facts therein certified, in all suits that now are or hereafter
may be depending, without obtaining the certificate of the clerks or prothonotaries
of the county courts to their official character. For such service they shall be
allowed a fee of twenty-five cents. coach
The act 26th May 1881 validates acknowledgments under their private seals, made
prior to that date.®
1 4 Kent’s Com. 452. See 1 Bouv. Inst. 544. 5 1 Dall. 416.
3 4 Kent 452, note a. 61Y. 344.
8 1 Dall. 63. 1S. & R.72. T 6 Penn. St. 302.
41W. 322. See 2 Greenl. Evid. 3 296. 8 Purd. 643,
[ 840 ]
Search-W@iarrants.
I. When to be issued. III. Judicial decisions.
II. Proceedings on a search-warrant. IV. Form of a search-warrant.
I. Tux right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects
against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated; and no warrants
shall issue but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particu-
larly describing the place to be searched, and the person or things to be seized.’
The people shall be sequre in their persons, houses, papers and possessions from
unreasonable searches and seizures; and no warrant to search any place, or seize
any person or things, shall issue, without describing them, as nearly as may be, nor
without probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, subscribed by the affiant.?
If. Aor 31 Marcu 1860. Purd. 548.
Szct. 5. When any person shall be accused before a magistrate, upon oath or
affirmation, of the crime of burglary, robbery or larceny, and the said magistrate
shall have issued his warrant to apprehend such person or persons, or to search for
such goods as have been described, on oath or affirmation, to have been stolen
goods, if any shall be found in the custody or possession of such person or persons,
or in the custody or possession of any other person or persons, for his, her or their
use, and there is probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, to suspect that
other goods, which may be discovered on such search, are stolen, it shall and may
be lawful for the said magistrate to direct the said goods to be seized, and to secure
the same in his own custody, unless the person in whose possession the same were
found shall give sufficient surety to produce the same at the time of his or her trial.
And the said magistrate shall forthwith cause an inventory to be taken of the said
goods, and shall file the same with the clerk of that court in which the accused
person is intended to be prosecuted, and shall give public notice in the newspapers,
or otherwise, by advertising the same in three or more public places in the city or
county where the offence is charged to have been committed, before the time of
trial, noting in such advertisement the said inventory, the person charged and time
of trial. And if on such trial, the accused party shall be acquitted, and no other
claimant shall appear or suit be commenced, then, at the expiration of three months,
such goods shall be delivered to the party accused, and he, she or they shall be
discharged, and the county be liable to the costs of prosecution; but if he be con-
victed of larceny only, and, after restitution made to the owner and the sentence of
the court being fully complied with, shall claim a right in the residue of the said
goods, and no other shall appear or claim the said goods, or any part of them, then
it shall be lawful, notwithstanding the claim of the said party accused, to detain
suck goods for the term of nine months, to the end that all persons having any
claim thereto may have full opportunity to come, and to the satisfaction of the court
prove their property in them ; on which proof the said owner or owners, respectively,
shall receive the said goods, or the value thereof, if from their perishable nature
it shall have been found necessary to make sale thereof, upon paying the reasonable
charges incurred by the securing the said goods and establishing their property in
the same ; but if no such claim shall be brought and duly supported, then the
person so convicted shall be entitled to the remainder of the said goods, or the value
thereof, in case the same shall have been sold agreeably to the original inventory.
But if upon an attainder of burglary or robbery, the court shall, after due inquiry
be of opinion that the said goods were not the property of such burglar or robber,
they shall be delivered, together with a certified copy of the said inventory, to the
commissioners of the county, who shall indorse a receipt therefor on the original
inventory, register the said inventory in a book, and also cause the same to be pub-
licly advertised, giving notice to all persons claiming the said goods to prove their
1 Const. U. S. 4th Amend. 2 Const. Penn’a. art. I. 3 8.
SEARCH-WARRANTS, $41
property therein to the said commissioners; and unless such proof shall be made
within three months from the date of such advertisement, the said goods shall be
publicly sold, and the net moneys arising from such sale shall be paid into the
county treasury for the use of the commonwealth: Provided always, That if any
claimant shall appear within one year, and prove his or her property in the said
goods to the satisfaction of the commissioners, or in the case of dispute, shall obtain
the verdict of a jury in favor of such claim, the said claimant shall be entitled to
recover, and receive from the said commissioners, or treasurer, the net amount of
the moneys paid as aforesaid into the hands of the said commissioners, or by them
paid into the treasurer of this commonwealth.
Il], The search-warrant is not to be granted without oath, made before the
justice, that the party complaining has probable cause to suspect his property has
been stolen, or is concealed in such a place, and showing his reasons for such sus-
picion ; the oath need not positively and directly aver that the property has been
stolen. The warrané should direct the search to be made in the day-time ; though
it is said that, where there is more than probable suspicion, the process may be exe-
cuted in the night. It ought to be directed to a constable, or other public officer,
and not to a private person ; though it is fit that the party complaining should be
present and assisting, because he will be able to identify the property he has lost.
It should also command that the goods found, together with the party in whose
custody they are taken, be brought before some justice of the peace; to the end
that, upon further examination of the fact, the goods and the prisoner may be dis-
posed of as the law directs.
A search-warrant must specify the place to be searched, as well as the particular
person to be taken.?
With respect to the mode of executing this warrant:—if the door be shut, and,
upon demand, not opened, it may be broken open; and so may boxes, after the
keys have been demanded—and though the goods be not found, the officer will be
excused ; though, if the party obtaining the warrant acted maliciously, he is liable
to a special action on the case, but not to an action of trespass.? In the execution
of criminal process, an officer may break open the doors of a house in the night-
time, as well as in the day-time, after demand of admittance and refusal.‘
To the validity of a search-warrant, description of place, person and things, is
requisite.’ But the constitution of Pennsylvania does not render necessary such a
particular-description as is prescribed by the 4th amendment to the constitution of
the United States, which only applies to federal process. Our state constitution
only provides that the things searched for shall be described as near as may be.
IV. Form oF A SEARCH-WARRANT.
COUNTY OF BLAIR, ss.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To the Constable of E—— township, in the said county, greeting :
Wuergas, information and complaint have thisday been made to J. R., Esquire, one
of our justices of the peace in and for the said county, upon the ee of A. B., that the
following articles, to wit, [here insert the articles and their value], were lately stolen and
carried away from this house, and that there is just cause to suspect that the said stolen
oods, or some part thereof, are concealed in the house of C. J)., of the said township
iblackemith]. These are therefore to command you to make diligent search, in the day-
time, in the house of the said C. D., for the said stolen goods, and if you find the same,
or any part thereof, that then you secure the said stolen goods, and bring the person or
. persons in whose custody you find the same, before our said justice, to be examined con-
cerning the premises, and further to be dealt with according to law.
Witness the said J. R., Esquire, at E township aforesaid, the [first] day of [May],
in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and eighty.
, J. R., Justice of the Peace. [sEaL.]
11 Chit. Cr. L. 65. 1 Conn. 40. 13 Mass. 286. 249.
5 Met, 98. § Iredell 45. 41N. H. 346. 1 Root 83, 134.
2 1 Chit. Or. L. 66. Kirby 213. See 18 Chicago 6 2J.J3. Marsh. 44,
L. News 87. 610 W. N. C. 136.
3 1 Chit. Cr. L. 66. 10 Johns. 263. 6 Blackf.
[ 842 ]
Seduction,
L Provisions of the Penal Code. II. Judicial decisions.
I. Aor 31 Maron 1860. Purd. 538.
Szor. 41. The seduction of any female of good repute, under twenty-one years
of age, with illicit connection, under promise of marriage, is hereby declared to be
a misdemeanor ; and any person who shall be convicted thereof, shall be sentenced
to pay a fine not exceeding five thousand dollars, and to undergo an imprisonment,
either at labor by separate or solitary confinement, or imprisonment without labor,
not exceeding three years, or both, or either, at the discretion of the court: Pro.
vided, That the promise of marriage shall not be deemed established, unless the
testimony of the female seduced is corroborated by other evidence, either circum-
stantial or positive.
*
II. To constitute the penal offence of seduction, there must be illicit connection,
and the female must be drawn aside from the path of virtue, which she was
honestly pursuing at the time the defendant approached her.’ But a single error
on the part of the female will not place her beyond the protection of the act, if
she has repented her error, and is walking in the path of virtue, and enjoying the
esteem of her acquaintance, when she is led astray.2 A female of bad reputation
at the time the defendant obtained connection with her (whether the reputation was
acquired by crime, or imprudence only), is not within the protection of the
act?
It must appear, to the satisfaction of the jury, that the seduction was accom-
plished by means of a promise of marriage. A rule has been established in civil
cases, which authorizes a jury to infer a promise of marriage, from open, long-con-
tinued, particular and exclusive attentions.‘
A conditional promise that if the girl would permit the defendant to have illicit
intercourse with her, he would marry her, is sufficient under the statute.®
Continued attentions to a female for several months, followed by an improper
intercourse, is sufficient evidence to warrant the inference of seduction. But
such attentions must be inconsistent with any other intent than that of marriage.’
In an action for the seduction of a daughter, her reputation for chastity may be
impeached by general reputation, but not by her reputation among a particular class
of people.’
A promise to marry, a request and a refusal, may be proved by circumstances,
and are entirely within the province of the jury to determine.®
A marriage, after seduction, followed by immediate desertion by the husband, is
a defence against an indictment for seduction, under the act of 1843.9 But not
to a subsequent action for damages by the father of the female seduced?
A confederacy to assist a female infant to escape from her father’s control,
with a view to marry her against his will, or to seduce her, is indictable at common
law.¥
On an indictment for seduction, the defendant may be convicted of simple
fornication.” ,
A minor who has arrived at the age of puberty may be convicted of this offence ;
it is not necessary that the promise of marriage should be a valid one.
1 2 Clark 351. Lewis’ Cr. L. 51. Sea 24 Penn. affirmatively the good repute of the female se-
St. 408. duced. 101 Penn. St. 214.
2 2 Clark 351. 18 Iowa 88. 9 24 Penn. St. 401. 3 Gilm. 202.
8 Ibid. 10 4 Clark 327,
«Ibid. 12 Penn. St. 318. 13 Ibid. 331. 11 14 Penn. St. 282.
5 26 N. Y. 203. 125 W.& S. 461.
6 2 Wend. 459. 18 17 Penn. St. 126, 102 Ibid. 408,
1 2 Brewst. 489. See 102 Penn. St. 408. 14 26 N.Y. 204.
8 2 Stew. 266. The prosecution must prove
[ 843 ]
Shipping,
THE owner of a vessel is responsible in damages for any injury occasioned to
another by the negligence or unskilful management of his ship, although she was
at the time in charge of a public pilot of the port. And the principle as to the
assessment of damages is this, as in other cases of a similar nature, that the com-
pensation should be equivalent to the injury1
Not only the ship’s husband, but all the real owners of a ship, are liable for work
done to the ship after their interest in her was acquired.? A shipwright has a lier
on a ship for repairs in port. ;
Workmen and material-men, having a lien on a vessel which has been taken in
execution and sold under a judgment in favor of the United States, are entitled to
payment out of the fund in preference to the United States.*
The master of a ship arriving at Philadelphia from a foreign port, is not bound
hy the bill of lading to deliver the goods to the consignee personally. The liability
of a ship-owner ceases when the goods are landed at the usual wharf.
To prove property in a vessel or cargo, other evidence than the registry, invoice,
&e., may be given; such as acts of ownership and the like.®
The landing of foreign convicts in this state, is made a penal offence by the act
of 31st March 1860."
Sodomy.
I. Definition. II. Punishment.
I. Aot 11 June 1879. Purd 539.
Sect. 1. The terms sodomy and buggery, as and where used in the laws of this
commonwealth, shall be understood to be a carnal copulation by human beings
with each other against nature, res veneria in ano, or with a beast, and shall be
taken to cover and include the act or acts where any person shall wilfully and
wickedly have carnal knowledge, in a manner against nature, of any other person,
by penetrating the mouth of such person; and any person who shall wickedly suffer
or permit any other person to wickedly and indecently penetrate, ina manner against
nature, his or her mouth, by carnal intercourse, he, she and every such person com-
mitting any of the acts aforesaid or suffering the same to be committed as afore-
said, shall be guilty of the crime of sodomy or buggery, and upon conviction
thereof, shall be liable to the punishment now prescribed by law for the crime of
sodomy or buggery.®
heard of: I did not know there were such crimes.”
Again, before the war, a Jesuit priest was sent to
one of the southern states; a negro hostler came
to his confessional: the father asked him “ Did
you ever grease your master’s horse’s teeth to pre-
4 Dall. 206.
1 Ibid. 129,
1 Pet. Ad. 236.
&
o
3
1 R. 203.
3 W. C. C. 209.
Purd. 388,
Would it not be better that some crimes should
go unpunished, than that such disgusting details
should be spread upon the statute book? An
anecdote or two will best explain my meaning.
Some twenty years ago, a foreign Catholic priest,
coming from @ part of Europe where such crimes
are prevalent, occupied a Philadelphia confes-
sional ; a few days afterwards, a gentleman whohad
confessed to him, said to the writer “that priest
asked me questions about sins that I had never
1
2
8
4
5
6
1
8
vent him from eating his oats?” To which the peni-
tent answered “No sah, nebber do such ting.”
But Sambo returned again and again, and every
time confessed to having greased the horse’s teeth.
At last, the father asked him “ How is this; the
first time you came to me, you had never greased
the horse’s teeth, and now you confess it every
time?” To which Sambo replied, “ I nebber knew
dat greasing a horse’s teeth would perwent him
eating his oats, until you told me, sah.” Any
reader can apply the moral, See 14 Luz. L.
Reg. 362. Commonwealth v. King, Public
Ledger 19 April 1890.
844 STRAYS.
II. Act 31 Marow 1860. Purd. 410.
Szor. 82. If any person shall commit sodomy or buggery, he shall be guilty of
felony, and on conviction, be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding one thousand
dollars, and to undergo an imprisonment, by separate or solitary confinement at labor,
not exceeding ten years. :
Sxor. 33. If any person shall, unlawfully and maliciously, assault another with
intent to commit sodomy or buggery, or if any person shall, wickedly and unlawfully,
solicit and incite, and endeavor to persuade another, to permit and suffer such per-
son to commit sodomy or buggery with him, such person shall be guilty of a mis-
demeanor; and being convicted of an assault, with the intent aforesaid, or of so
inciting another to suffer the act of sodomy or buggery to be committed with him,
shall be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding three hundred dollars, and undergo
an imprisonment, by separate or solitary confinement, at labor, not exceeding three
ears.
. Sxcr. 92. It shall not be necessary in any case of rape, sodomy or carnal abuse
of a female child under the age of ten years, to prove the actual emission of seed,
in order to constitute a carnal knowledge, but the carnal knowledge shall be deemed
complete upon proof of penetration only.!
By the act of 1705, a conviction of this offence, by a married person, entitled
the party injured to a divorce.? And this provision does not appear to have been
supplied by any subsequent enactment.
—————
Straps.
[See Swine. ]
If any person shall discover upon his, her or their improved and inclosed lands,
any stray cattle, horse or sheep, it shall and may be lawful for such person or per-
sons to take up the same; and it shall be the duty of such person or persons to
give notice thereof to the owner of such stray, if he or she can be readily found ;
but if otherwise, such person as aforesaid shall, within four days, deliver to the
town-clerk aforesaid, a particular description of the color and marks, natural or
artificial, of such stray or strays, in writing or other satisfactory way ; and for every
neglect or refusal to do the same, he or she shall forfeit and pay the sum of five
dollars, to be recovered as debts of a similar amount are by law recoverable. And
it shall be the duty of the town-clerk, subject to like penalty for neglect or refusal,
to make an entry of the same in the book aforesaid, for which entry so made the
said clerk shall receive for each head of horse kind, fifty cents; and for each head
of cattle, twenty-five cents; for every sheep, six cents; to be paid by the person
delivering such notice aforesaid. And such person may detain such stray or strays
until the owner thereof shall reimburse him or her the expense of such entry, and
also pay all reasonable charges for publishing such notice, which shall not exceed
the sum of six cents per mile, to be estimated from the residence of the person
taking up such stray or strays to the place of keeping the book aforesaid, and also
all reasonable expense for keeping such stray or strays, as well as the damage which
may have been done by the same.®
If the owner of any such stray or strays, taken up as aforesaid, shall appear, and
neglect or refuse to make or tender a reasonable satisfaction to the party injured,
for the damages sustained by such trespass, and for the cost of keeping such stray,
or if such person or persons detaining such stray shall not accept the said satisfac-
tion, it shall be lawful for either of the parties aforesaid to complain to any justice
of the peace of the proper township or county where such stray shall be taken up
as aforesaid, who shall, upon such complaint and application, issue his warrant,
directed to three disinterested and honest freeholders of the neighborhood, com-
man ling and enjoining them forthwith to view the trespass, to value and appraise
1 Purd. 535, 3 Act 13 April
q pril 1807 2. Purd. 1947, Its
2 Bradf, Laws 1714, p. 41. provisions were ae ta eee hacer ava
STRAYS. 845
the same, having a due regard to the sufficiency of the fence of such inclosure, with
the expense and cost of keeping the said stray or strays, to make report thereof to
him the said justice with all convenient speed; which said valuation and appraise-
ment and return they, the said freeholders, are hereby enjoined and required to make
accordingly ; and if the said valuation and appraisement shall not amount to more
than the sum of money tendered to the party injured, as a recompense for the
damage done as aforesaid, before such complaint made, then the said justice shall
give judgment for the same only, to the party refusing such tender, and award
reasonable costs; but if the said valuation shall amount to more than the sum
tendered, or if no such tender be made, then and in tbat case, the said justice
shall award and give judgment for the valuation aforesaid to the parties injured,
with reasonable costs for keeping the stray aforesaid (to be estimated from the time
of giving notice as aforesaid), against the other party, and shall award execution
upon every such judgment, with costs of suit accordingly: Provided, That the
said valuation and appraisement come within the jurisdiction of the said justice,
but if not, then the said damage shall be recovered as debts of an equal amount
are by law recoverable.!
And provided always, That if no owner for any such stray shall have been found,
within thirty days after the same shall have been taken up, then and in that case,
the person taking up the same shall not be entitled to receive any compensation for
the damages done by the same, unless he shall, within six days thereafter, have
given notice to three disinterested freeholders, to value and ascertain the amount of
the same, which they are hereby authorized and required to do forthwith, and to
make report thereof on oath or affirmation, to any justice of the peace residing in
the proper towaships; who shall, when the owner of such stray shall be found,
upon his or her neglect or refusal to pay the same, give judgment and award execu-
tion with costs as aforesaid: And provided also, That if the amount of the said
appraisement and valuation be not within the jurisdiction of a justice of the peace,
the said damage may be sued for before any court of competent jurisdiction ; and in
all cases before a justice, the defendant or plaintiff shall have like benefit of stay of
execution or appeal, as is given under the existing laws relating to justices of the peace.?
If no owner shall appear within [thirty] days after any such stray shall have
been taken up, it sball be the duty of the person taking up the same, to cause an
advertisement, particularly describing such stray, to be published at least in one
newspaper in the proper county, if any there be, but if otherwise, to publish the
same, by written or printed advertisements, which shall be put up at six or more
public places in the county ; and if no owner shall appear and make out his or her
property in the said stray or strays, within [ninety] days after the publication of
such advertisements as aforesaid, the person taking up the same shall make applica-
tion to any justice of the peace in the said township, who is hereby authorized and
required to issue his warrant to any constable within the township as aforesaid,
and cause him to expose the said stray or strays to public sale, first giving at least
ten days’ notice in three or more public places in the said township ; and after he shall
have sold the same, he shall make a return thereof to the said justice, who shall, after
the payment of all reasonable charges and damages, and cost of keeping as aforesaid,
pay over the surplus, if any there be, of such sale, to the county treasury ; but if the
owner of such stray or strays shall appear within one year after such sale, and prove
his, her or their property to such stray or strays, the said justice, or any other in
the county, shall certify the same to the county treasurer, who shall pay to the
said owner the whole amount of such surplus aforesaid ; but if no owner shall appear
within the time limited as aforesaid, he or she shall be thereafter barred from all
right to the same, and the money aforesaid may be applied to such purposes as other
moneys in the treasury usually are.* .
If the owner of any stray or strays, taken up under the authority of the act
to which this is a supplement, shall not appear upon notice given, or having
appeared, shall neglect or refuse to make or tender reasonable satisfaction to the
party injured for the damages sustained by reason of the trespass of such stray
and for the costs of keeping; or if such injured party shall not accept the satis-
faction which may be offered; it shall be the duty of such injured party to make
immediate application to any justice of the peace of the proper county, who shall
1 Act 13 April 1807 2 3. Purd. 1947. 2 Ibid. 8 Ipid. 3 4.
846 SUMMARY CONVICTIONS.
proceed upon such application, in the manner directed by the act to which this is a
supplement."
If the owner shall not have appeared within ten days after any euch stray shall
have been taken up, it shall be the duty of the person taking up such stray, to cause
the same to be advertised, in manner prescribed by the 4th section of the act to
which this is a supplement, And if the owner shall not have appeared within siaty
days after such advertisement and publication, the person taking up the same shall
make application to a justice of the peace, and the same proceedings shall be had,
as are directed by the act to which this is a supplement.’ : ;
If any person or persons taking up any stray or strays shall neglect to give notice
as is hereinbefore directed, he, she or they so offending, shall forfeit all right and
title to, or recovery of any sum or sums of money for any trespass committed by the
same, but shall deliver up the said stray or strays so detained to the owner thereof,
without any recompense, fee or reward whatsoever.’
A horse stolen from the owner is within the act; a sale under it, of such stolen
horse, will pass the title.*
Neglect to give notice to the owner, when known, works a forfeiture of all dam-
ages; and entitles the owner to the stray, without recompense to the party injured.
Unless the party taking up a stray proceeds in the mode directed by the act, he
is a trespasser ab initio Riding a horse taken up as an estray, for the purpose
of discovering the owner, is not such an act of conversion as will support an action
of trover.”
That the magistrate to whom the complaint was made, was a justice of the proper
township or county must appear upon the face of the conviction.®
The issuing of the warrant is a judicial act, the regularity of which cannot be
inquired into collaterally. A sale under the warrant will pass a good title to the
purchaser, whether the proceedings be regular or not.®
A certiorari does not lie to remove the proceedings to the supreme court.’
The act of 1807 originally extended only to the counties of Philadelphia, Bucks,
Chester, Lancaster, Northampton, Wayne and Delaware; by subsequent acts, it has
been extended throughout the state. For the numerous local acts on the subject
of strays, the reader is referred to the pamphlet laws.
See act 26 April 1889 (Purd. 1947), making it unlawful to permit certain animals to
run at large on the highways.
Summary Conbictions.
I. Requisites of a summary conviction. ITI. A form of general record of conviction.
II. Judicial decisions.
I, A conviction is a ‘record of the summary proceedings upon any penal
statute, before one or more justices of the peace, or other persons duly authorized,
in a case where the offender has been convicted and sentenced,”
As this mode of jurisdiction has been introduced in derogation of the common
law, and operates to the exclusion of trial by jury, the superior courts of justice
have rigidly confined its authority to the strict letter of the respective statutes by
which it was established ; and in revising its proceedings, they require that rules
similar to those adopted by the common law in criminal prosecutions, and founded
in natural justice, should appear to have been observed, unless where the statutes
expressly dispense with the form of stating them.” But though the courts are
strict in forming their judgment upon convictions, they will notalways be astute in
finding objections to them.”
A conviction cannot be good in part and bad in part, but must be wholly quashed,
if there is any fault.
1 Act 5 March 1819 3 2. Purd. 1948. 8 5 Luz. L. Reg. 122.
2 Thid. 2 3. 9 6 W. 492,
8 Act 13 April 1807 3 5. Purd. 1949. 10 2 R, 20.
47 W. 482. 11 Bose. on Conv. 7.
5 1 Ash. 203. 121 Burr, 613. 4 Ibid. 2281. 1 Bay 857.
6 16 Penn. St. 22. 5 Luz. L. Reg. 122. 18 1 Ld. Raym., 681. 2 T. R. 18.
17 W. 557. 4 Cowp. 728. 2 Str. 900.
SUMMARY CUNVIOCTIONS. 847
The proceedings usually consist of three parts: 1. The information: 2. The
summons: 3. The appearance or non-appearance of the defendant: 4. In case he
appears, his defence or confession: 5. Unless he has confessed, the evidence: 6.
The judgment.
Information. —The information must always be stated at large. Where the statute
directs the information to be on oath, it should be so stated in the conviction. Some-
times, where the offence is an invasion of private property, a complaint from the
owner, or at least some proof of his dissent, is deemed necessary, even though
the statute does not expressly require it.
The information should contain :—1. The day when it was taken, that it may
appear to have been given within the time limited by the statute. 2. The place
where it was taken, that it may appear that the justice was acting within the
limits of his jurisdiction. Here, it should seem, that the name of the county
must be in the body of the conviction, and that a reference to the county
in the margin is not sufficient, as it would be in an order, for the courts are
far stricter in cases of conviction, and it has always been deemed necessary in an
indictment. 3. The name of the informer, that, as most of the statutes give a
part of the penalty to him, it may appear afterwards that the witness is not the
same person, it having been settled that the informer cannot be a witness where he
is entitled to any part of the penalty. 4. The name and style ot the justice
or justices to whom it is given, that it may appear he or they have autbority to
take such information? 5. The name of the offender. 6. The time of com-
mitting the offence ought to be stated, for the same reason that renders the
time of taking the information material. However, the particular day need not be
mentioned, provided the days are mentioned between which the fact is charged to
have been committed ; and all that is necessary to be laid in point of time is, that
the prosecution appear to have been made within the limitation of the particular
statute. 7. The place where the offence was committed must be inserted, that it
may appear to be within the jurisdiction of the magistrate before whom the infor-
mation is laid.* 8. The information must contain an exact description of the offence.
The best general rule for describing the offence is to pursue exactly the words of the
statute ;° but the rule admits of many modifications and exceptions.®
Where a statute expresses more offences than one in the disjunctive, though ‘n
the same seutence, you may convict on either.’
In some cases, you must state the offence and its circumstances more fully than
the statute on which the conviction is founded describes it. Thus, what is strongly
and necessarily implied in a statute, though not expressed in terms, should be
expressed in a conviction.® Also, the number and nature of things taken, destroyed,
damaged or embezzled (as the case may be) should be expressed ; more especially,
wherever the statute directs any recompense to be given to the party injured,
as when the conviction is upon a statute against the robbing of orchards, cutting
of trees, &c., the number of trees cut should be mentioned.?
Though exactness and precision is required in describing the offence ; yet where
a conviction expresses a number of offences consisting of the same fact repeated, the
words that charge the fact to be an offence need not be repeated as many times as
the fact is alleged to have been committed.” ; ;
Of the summons.—The summons follows the information; and since it cannot,
from the reason of the thing, be prior in order of time; so if the summons bear
date on an earlier day than the information, it would vitiate the conviction." The
party ought, in point of fact, to be summoned. In the case of the King v. Vena-
bles, “the court were unanimously of opinion that the party in those cases ought
to be summoned in fact, and if the justices proceeded against a person without
summoning him, it would be a misdemeanor in them, for which an information
would lie against them.’’”
1 4 Burr, 2282. : 1 Str. eh
2 2 Salk. 474. 1 Str. 261, 443, 711. 2 Burr. is
3 1 Salk. 369. 1 Ld. Raym, 581. 10 Mod.248. 9 2 Ld. Raym. 900. 6 Oo. 34. 2Str.900. 2
23 Penn. St. 521. Pars. 480.
42 Ld. Raym. 1220. 10 1 Ld. Raym. 583.
5 23 Penn. St. 521. 11 2 Ibid. 1546.
6 2 Burr. 679. 17. R.222. 1Ld.Raym.581:; 121 Str. 630. 1 Park. Cr. R. 95. T. U. P.
2 Pars. 265. Charlt. 235.
848 SUMMARY CONVICTIONS.
Of the appearance or non-appearance of defendant,—It must be stated whether
the defendant appeared or not, for only in the case of his not appearing 18 the sum-
mons material; for it is settled, that the appearance cures every defect of summons.!
“We are all of opinion the offender may be convicted, without appearing. The
statute is silent as to the method of proceeding; and the law of England, it is true,
in point of material justice, always requires the party charged with any offence to
be heard before he be condemned in judgment; but that rule must have this excep-
tion, unless it is through his own default; were it otherwise, every criminal might
avoid conviction. The law being so, the magistrate is bound to give some oppor-
tunity to the party to appear, and if upon such notice he neither come nor send a
sufficient excuse, the magistrate may proceed to judgment. If this was not to be
allowed, the consequence would be, that the offender would escape unpunished,
because he would never appear purposely to be be convicted, and that would be to
make the execution of the law depend on the will of the offender.”
Of the defence or confession.—If the defendant confesses the charge, the justice
may convict without going into any evidence against him; and it has been deter-
mined he may do so, even where the statute says nothing of confession, but only
directs him to convict by the oath of a witness or witnesses. But the confession
must be of such facts as fully constitute an offence ; otherwise it will not supply any
defect of evidence.®
Tf the defendant denies the fact charged upon him, or pleads not guilty, the next
thing to be stated is—
The evidence.—It should contain, as well as the information, the day and place
when it was taken, the name of the offender, and the time when the offence was
committed, subject to the qualification before stated, viz., that it may be sufficient
to fix it between such and such a day.*
It must also contain, first, the name of the witness, that he may appear to be a
different person from the informer, as the statutes generally give the latter a part:
of the penalty ;° secondly, the evidence must be stated to have been given in the
presence of the defendant, that it may appear he has had the benefit of a cross-
examination.®
The court will presume the witness to have been examined in the defendant's
presence, unless the contrary appear.’ Even if it shall appear, on the conviction,
that the evidence was not given in the defendant’s presence, yet if he confess the
charge that irregularity is cured.®
A third rule with regard to the evidence, is, that it must be of a fact prior to, or
existing at, the time of the information, and not of a fact subsequent to it?
A fourth rule is, that the fact must be proved to have been committed in
the place where it was laid, or at least within some place within the jurisdiction of the
magistrate convicting.”
The fifth and last rule respecting the evidence, is, that it shall be set out at large,
and (as a necessary consequence) contain a full and accurate statement of the facts
that constitute the offence.
In setting forth the act or acts of the defendant that constitute the offence the
evidence should, in general, be more particular than the information. In some
instances, the offence can only be described generally in the information, and yet
consists either of a number of distinct acts, which, in the aggregate, constitute the
offence, and must, therefore, be set forth in the evidence, or of some act that, from
its nature, must have been, in point of fact, particularly set forth by the wituess,
and, therefore, ought to be so by the justice.
Of the judgment or adjudication.—The judgment is a necessary part of every
conviction, and should contain, first, an adjudication that the defendant is convicted,
and, secondly, an adjudication of the forfeiture or penalty.™
As to the first, the general way of expressing it is to say, ‘* that the defendant is
convicted of the said offence against the form of the statute.”* On the other hand,
11 Salk. 383. 3 Burr. 1785. 8 1T. R. 320.
21 Str. 44, Parker, C. J. 9 1 Ld. Raym. 509.
8 1 Burr. 609. 0 1T. R. 241,
41 Salk. 378. 1 Ld. Raym, 581. Ml] Bay 357. 6 N.Y. 327. 2 Pars. 265.
5 2 Ld. Raym. 1545. 121 Burr. 609. 2T. BR. 18.
6 2 Str. 1240. 38 Burr. 1786, 27. RB. 18. -13'- 1 Park. Or. R, 95.
73 Burr. 1786. 2 T. R. 18. lM Skin. 562.
SUMMARY CONVICTIONS, 849
when more offences than one are charged in the information (as where a man was
charged, on one of the lottery acts, with dealing in shares of lottery tickets, and
also with registering tickets without a licence), it is not sufficient to say, he is ‘‘ con-
victed of the said offence,” but if (which the court seemed to doubt) both offences
ae have been included in one conviction, he should have been convicted of
both.
The second and last branch of the judgment is a declaration of the forfeiture, cr
penalty incurred, and a distribution of the sum forfeited, in case the statute so
directs. This declaration is held to be a necessary part of every conviction.?
As to the distribution of the forfeiture, it should seem there need not be any
stated by the justice, where the statute expressly gives it in certain proportions?
But where justices are required, by a penal statute, to distribute the penalty, on
conviction, amongst certain persons, according to their discretion, an adjudication
that the forfeiture be disposed of “as the law directs,” is bad, for in such cases the
justice or justices should adjudge what the several proportions shall be.*
_ IL. The essentials of a summary conviction, are, an information, that the defend-
ant be summoned, or have notice of the charge, and an opportunity to make his
defence, that the evidence be such as the common law approves, unless the statute
directs otherwise, a conviction, judgment and execution according to the common
law, influenced by the special authority under the statute, and a record of the whole
proceedings, setting forth the particular circumstances, so as to appear that the
justice has conformed to the law and not exceeded his jurisdiction.
A conviction, by the mayor of Philadelphia, under a city ordinance against
huckstering, which does not state where the offence was committed, is bad.
Where a return to a certiorari stated that the defendant was summoned to
answer, &c., “for placing goods on the footway of the street, and in his porch,”
and the judgment was that the plaintiff recover of the defendant, without stating
on which part of the charge judgment was given, the return was held bad.’
Where a form of summary conviction is peremptorily prescribed, it must be
exactly followed ; but if the provision is merely directory, and the conviction con-
tains everything required by the form given, it will not be vitiated by unnecessarily
stating more than is required. Where no statutory form of conviction is given,
and the proceedings are according to the course of the common law, every positive
ingredient must be repeated in proof, and is not to be taken by reference merely to
the charge. The form of conviction, given by the 4th section of the act of 22d
April 1794, for the prevention of vice and immorality, is directory merely, and,
under that act the justice is not bound to send up the evidence given before him.®
If the justice does send up the evidence, the court will not look into it to ascer-
tain if the conviction is warranted by it.
When an act of assembly, creating an offence, provides that the person so
offending, on conviction thereof, before a justice of the county, shall pay a fine
of five dollars for every such offence, to be recovered as debts of like amount
are recoverable, by any person who may sue for the same, the offender need not be
convicted by indictment or by summary process, before the justice, but simply in
an action of debt, by a judgment for the penalty, if proved guilty of the offence.”
In a summary conviction, under the 2d section of the act of 22d April 1794, for
profane swearing, the judgment must ascertain not only the amount of fine inflicted,
but also the alternative duration of imprisonment; and if it do not, the proceedings
are void, and the defendant cannot be held in prison.” ;
A summary conviction must agree with, and cannot exceed the charge in the
information. Several offences may be contained in one conviction. =
Where the information or complaint, in a case of summary conviction, is so’
117, R. 249, 8 1 Ash, 410.
2 1 Salk. 378. 2Str. 858. 2 Burr. 1163. 9 Thid.
8 1 Salk. 383. 10 10 W. 382. 30 Leg. Int. 321.
427. BR. 96. | 11 1 Clark 408. And see 34 Penn. St. 403. &
5 51 Penn. St. 272. 30 Leg Int. 321. L. Law Rev. 17.
6 4 Dall. 266. 3 Y. 475. 12 2 Clark 49.
4
850 SUMMARY CONVICTIONS.
specific as to give the defendant notice of the substance, time and place of the
offence charged, it is sufficient, Any-indefiniteness in the information or summons
is cured, by the defendant appearing and going on to trial without objection.
If the record of conviction set forth a definite offence, it is not vitiated by the
fact that the same offence is indefinitely charged in the information on which
the writ issued.” :
The judgment of the court of common pleas, on a certiorari to a summary con-
viction by a justice of the peace, may be reviewed on writ of error in the supreme
court.’ ;
In order to sustain a summary conviction for violation of a borough ordinance, it
is necessary that the record should contain a finding that the special act complained
of, has been performed by the defendant ; and that it should describe or define a
in such a way as to distinguish it, and show that it falls within an unlawful class.
Act 17 Aprin 1876. Purd. 1949.
In all cases of summary conviction in this commonwealth, before a magistrate or
court not of record, either party may, within five days after such conviction, appeal to
the court of quarter sessions of the county in which such magistrate shall reside, or.
court not of record shall be held, upon allowance of the said court of quarter sessions,
or any judge thereof, upon cause shown, and either party may also appeal from the
judgment of a magistrate or a court not of record, in a suit for a penalty, to the court
of common pleas of the county in which said judgment shall be rendered, upon allow-
ance of said court orany judge thereof, upon cause shown: Provided, That all appeals
from summary conviction and judgments for penalties, shall be upon such terms as to
payments of costs, and entering bail, as the court or judge allowing the appeal shall
direct.
IIJ. A FORM OF GENERAL RECORD OF CONVICTION.
BUCKS COUNTY, ss.
BE IT REMEMBERED, that on the 26th day of April, a. p. 1880, at the township of Bristol,
in the county of Bucks aforesaid, A. B., of the said township, farmer, cometh before J.
R., one of the justices of the peace of the commonwealth of Pennsylvania, in and for the
said county, and on his oath or affirmation {if an oath or affirmation is required by
the act upon which the conviction is founded], informs me, the said justice, that E. F.,
of the township of Falls, in the said county, on the 20th day of April last past, at the
township of Bristol aforesaid, in the said county, did [here set forth the fact in the words
of the act of assembly, as near as may be] contrary to the form of the act of assembly
in that case made and provided. And afterwards, upon the 2d day of May, in the year
aforesaid, at Bristol, in the county of Bucks aforesaid, the said E. F., having been pre-
viously summoned to appear befure me, the said justice, upon the said 2d day of May,
in the year aforesaid, at ten of the clock in the forenoon of that day, at my office, in Bris-
tol, to answer the matter of complaint contained in the said information, he, the said E.
F., appears before me, the said justice, to answer ; whereupon I, the said J. R., proceed
to examine into the truth of the said complaint, contained in the said information, in the
presence and hearing as well of the said A. B. as of the said E. F.; and thereupon, on
the day and year last mentioned, at the township of Bristol aforesaid, G. H. comes before
me to prove the charge contained in the said information against the said E. F., and is
now by me, the said justice, sworn to speak the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but
the truth, of and upon the matters contained in the said information ; and the said G. H.,
being so sworn, does on his oath say and depose, in the presence and hearing of the said
K. F., that the said E. F., on the 20th day of April last past, at the township of Bristol,
in the said county, did [here again set forth the fact, or so much thereof as is sufficient to
convict the offender]. And the said KE. F. does not produce any evidence to contradict
the proof aforesaid. Wherefore, it appears to me, the said justice, that the said E. F. is
guilty of the premises charged upon him by the said information. It is, therefore,
adjudged by me, the said justice, that the said B. F., according to the form of the act of
general assembly aforesaid, be convicted, and he is accordingly convicted, of the offence
charged upon him by the said information. And I do hereby adjudge that the said E. F.
for the said offence, hath forfeited the sum of [ten dollars], lawful money of the United
States, to be distributed as the act of general assembly aforesaid doth direct. In witness
whereof, I, the said justice, to this present record of conviction, have set my hand and
seal, at Bristol township, in the said county, the 2d day of May, a. p. 1880.
J. R., Justice of the Peace. [szat.]
1 23 Penn. St. 621, 5 23 Penn. St. 521.
4 Thid. # 102 Ibid. 312.
[ 851 ]
Summons for Debt, Ke.
I, When a summons may issue. IV. When an attachment may issue against a
II. How the justice should issue the summons. defaulting witness.
{II. How to serve and make return of the service V. Summonses in debt or demand, in trover and
of a summons, &e. conversion, and in damages.
I. OF ISSUING A SUMMONS.
On complaint made in relation to any demand within the jurisdiction of the jus”
tice, he may issue process. Having ascertained that the complaint is cognisable
before him, the next inquiry is, as to the residence of the defendant. If that shall
be found to be within the district for which the magistrate shall have been commis-
sioned, then let the process be filled up and issue. Although a defendant may not
reside, yet if he be found within the jurisdiction of the magistrate, and the process
be legally served and returned, it is the duty of the magistrate to act upon it, in the
same manner, and the proceedings will be equally valid, as if the defendant were a
resident of the district in which the justice resides.
II. OF FILLING UP THE SUMMONS.
If the suit be brought for debt, by one individual against another, the summons
should be made to read ‘‘ summon A. B. to answer C. D.”
If brought by partners in trade, against partners in trade, it should read “ sum-
mon H. F. and G. H., trading under the firm of F. & H., to answer J. J. and L.
K., trading under the firm of J. & K.” If either of the firms shall have been dis-
solved, the summons may read “‘ lately trading, &c.”’
If brought by executors against an individual, it may read “summon M. N. to
answer O. P. and Q. R., executors of the last willand testament of S. F., deceased.”
If the suit be brought by administrators, the summons should be filled up in a
similar manner.
If the suit be brought by au individual against husband and wife, the debt having
been contracted by the wife before her marriage, the summons should read “ sum-
mon U. V. and W. V., his wife, late W. X., to answer Y. Z.”
The summons must fix a certain time for the appearance of the defendant to
answer, which, by the act of 1855, may be between two designated hours of the
day, after the lapse of which time, the defendant is in default, and the justice may
proceed ex parte.
Summonses in ¢rover, or in trespass, &c., may be filled up in the same way as those
for debt.
III. OF THE SERVICE OF THE SUMMONS, &O.
The remarks about to be made in relation to this process and its service, apply
with equal force to every description of summons, scire facias and subpena. The
mode of service in all these cases is the same. ‘‘ The service,” says the law of
March 20th, 1810, § 2, ‘on the defendant, shall be by [the constable] producing
the original summons to, and informing him [the person to be summoned] of the |
contents thereof;”’ that is, by permitting the defendant to read it; by reading it to
him ; or, to use the words of the law, “ by informing him of the contents thereof ;””
by whom he is sued; and when, where and before whom, he is to appear. If the
constable shall deliver to the defendant a copy of the summons, without reading, or
saying anything about its contents, that will be good service. When called upon
to make a return of the summons s0 served to the justice, the constable should write
on the back of it, “served on the defendant by producing to him the original sum-
mons, and informing him of the contents thereof ;” the constable subscribing his
name and the date of the service, on the back of the summons. .
This is one way of serving a summons ; but lest the constable might not have an
opportunity of seeing the defendant, the law provides that it shall be good service
of the summons for the constable to leave ‘a copy of it at his [the defendant’s]
852 SUMMONS FOR DEBT.
dwelling-house, in the presence of one or more of his family, or neighbors, at least
four days before the time of hearing” at the office of the justice.
The constable must attend to the following particulars:—He must make an
exact copy of the process. He will be the more certain to do this, by bearing in
mind that on its return, he is to swear [or, if conscientiously scrupulous of taking
an oath, affirm] to the correctness of the copy. He must be particular where he
leaves the copy. It must be left “at the dwedling-house 3” it will not do to leave
it at the defendant’s store, or at his counting-house, or work-shop or mill, or at any
other place than his “ dwelling-house ;” there, the law directs it to be served, and
there our courts have ruled it shall be served.
The summons must be delivered to a constable, to be served by him; he has no
right to depute another to perform this duty. He may, at the request and risk of
the plaintiff, give on the back of a warrant, a special deputation to aaother person
to serve it, because this authority is vested in him by the act of assembly. ‘This is
believed to be the only ci? process on which a constable is authorized to give a
special deputation.
It must be left at the dwelling-house of the defendant, in the presence of “ one
or more of his family or neighbors.” The law does not expect from the constable
to inquire whether the person who opens the door of the dwelling-house, or to whom
he delivers the copy, is a relation, or is in the employ of the defendant. If he or
she shall appear to reside in or about the house, that person will be presumed to be
one of his family, or one of his neighbors.
It must be left at the dwelling-house, not at the store, mill or work-shop of
the defendant, “at least four days before the time of hearing ” at the office of the
justice.
: Having attended to these simple but indispensable particulars, in the service, the
constable must attend to the return which he is to make in writing to the justice,
on the back of each of the processes he shall have been intrusted to serve. It may
be as follows: ‘‘Served on the defendant, by leaving a copy of the within process
at his dwelling-house, in the presence of one of his family” [or one of his neigh-
bors], as the case may be. Signed, D. C., constable, July 4th, 1882. 3
When there are the names of more than one person in the process, who are to b
summoned, it is the duty of the constable to serve all the persons named, if he can,
and to indorse the result of his inquiries on the summons or subpana. As thus: A
summons is issued against A. B., 0. D. and E. F., trading under the firm of B., D.
& F. Hach of these persons should be named in the return on the back of the
summons, thus: ‘‘ Served on A. B. by producing to him the original summons, and
informing him of the contents hereof; on ©. D., by leaving a copy of the within
writ at his dwelling-house, in the presence of one of his family ; the other defend-
ant, K. F., not found. G. H., constable, July 4th, 1882.”
The truth of this return being verified by the oath or affirmation of the constable,
the process may be filed, until the appearance of one or both of the parties at the
time appointed for the hearing.
IV. The service of a subpoena, if made and attested as above laid down, is to be
reyarded as sufficient for all purposes to the parties who may have issued it, save
only that no attachment may issue against a defaulting witness, until it have been
duly proved that the subpena was personally served on him. This being done, and
an application made, the justice may issue an attachment to compel the attendance
of the witness forthwith, or at another time to which the case may be adjourned.
The attachment may issue according to the form given under the title ‘ Attachment
for Contempt.”
V. Copy oF A SUMMONS IN DEBT OR DEMAND.
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ss.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To the Constable of the Fifth Ward, or to the next Constable of the said city, most con-
venient to the defendant, greeting:
You are hereby commanded to summon Timothy Holdfast to be and appear on the third
day of December 1881, between the hours of 9 and 10 o'clock in the D oecet, hefera
SUMMONS FOR DEBT. 853
John White, one of the magistrates of the said city, to answer J oseph Graspall, in a plea
of debt or demand, “arising from contract, either express or implied,” not exceeding one
hundred dollars. Witness our said magistrate, at Philadelphia, who hath hereunto sub-
scribed his name and affixed his seal, the 27th day of November, in the year of our Lord
one thousand eight hundred and eighty-one.
: : Joan Wuire, Magistrate. [seat]
The magistrate’s court is No. 404 Library street. ‘
SUMMONS IN TROVER AND CONVERSION.
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ss.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To the Constable of the Fifth Ward, or to the next Constable of the said city, most con-
venient to the defendant, greeting:
You are hereby commanded to summon James Find to be and appear on the third day
of December 1880, between the hours of 11 and 12 o’clock at noon, before John White,
one of the magistrates of the said city, to answer John Lost, in a plea of trover and con-
version, for damages not exceeding one hundred dollars. Witness our said magistrate, at
Philadelphia, who hath hereunto subscribed his name, and affixed his seal, the 27th day
of November, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and eighty.
Joun Wuire, Magistrate. [sEan.]
The magistrate’s court is No. 404 Library street.
SUMMONS IN TRESPASS FOR DAMAGES.
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ss.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To the Constable of Fifth Ward, or to the next Constable of the said city, most conve-
nient to the defendant, greeting :
You are hereby commanded to summon Mark Force to be and appear on the sixth day
of December 180, between the hours of 8 and 9 o’clock in the forenoon, before John
White, one of the magistrates of the said city, to answer Peter Resist, of a plea of tres-
pass, brought for the recovery of damages, for injury done or committed by the defendant,
on the real or personal estate of the plaintiff, not exceeding one hundred dollars. Wit-
ness our said magistrate, at Philadelphia, who hath hereunto set his hand and seal, the
first day of December, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and eighty.
Joun Wuire, Magistrate. [sEaL.]
The magistrate’s court is No. 404 Library street.
SUMMONS FOR A PENALTY.
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ss.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To the Constable of Fifth Ward, or to the next Constable of the said city, most conve-
nient to the defendant, greeting:
You are hereby commanded to summon Thomas Rude to be and appear on the sixth
day of December 1880, between the hours of 10 and 11 o’clock in the forenoon, before
John White, one of the magistrates of the said city, to answer Jonas Trusty in a plea of
debt, for a penalty, not exceeding one hundred dollars.'| Witness our said magistrate, at
Philadelphia, who hath hereunto subscribed his name, and affixed his seal, the first day
of December, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and eighty.
Joun Wuirt, Magistrate. [sEat.]
The magistrate’s court is No. 404 Library street.
1 See 2 Del. Co. R. 490.
[ 854 J
Sunday.
V. Sale of liquors punished.
VI. Judicial authorities and decisions.
VII. Of contracts made on Sunday.
VIII. Breach of the Lord’s Day.
I. No person shall be arrested on Sunday but
for felony, treason or breach of the peace.
II. Drinking in ale-houses, &c., forbidden.
III. Worldly employment prohibited.
IV. Holidays falling on Sunday.—Bills and
notes falling due on Sunday.
I. Act oF 1705. Purd. 1950.
Srcr. 4. No person or persons upon the first day of the week shall serve or execute,
or cause to be served or executed, any writ, precept, warrant, order, judgment or de-
cree, except in cases of treason, felony or breach of the peace; but the serving of any
such writ, precept, warrant, order, judgment or decree shall be void to all intents and
purposes whatsoever; and the person or persons so serving or executing the same,
shall be as liable to the suit of the party aggrieved, and to answer damages to him for
doing thereof, as if he or they had done the same without any writ, precept, warrant,
order, judgment or decree at all.
II. Secor. 5. All persons who are found drinking and tippling in ale-houses, taverns
or other public house or place on the first day of the week, commonly called Sunday,
or any part thereof, shall, for every offence, forfeit and pay one shilling and sixpence
to any constable that shall demand the same, to the use of the poor; and all consta-
bles are hereby empowered, and, by virtue of their office, required, to search public
houses and places suspected to entertain such tipplers, and them, when found, quietly
to disperse ; but in case of refusal, to bring the persons so refusing before the next
justice of the peace, who may commit such offenders * * * or bind them to their
good behavior, as to him shall seem requisite.
ITI. Act 22 Aprin 1794. Purd. 1950.
Secr. 1. If any person shall do or perform any worldly employment or business
whatsoever on the Lord's day, commonly called Sunday, works of necessity and
charity only excepted, or shall use or practise any unlawful game, hunting, shooting,
sport or diversion whatsoever, on the same day, and be convicted thereof, every such
person, so offending, shall, for every such offence, forfeit and pay four dollars,” to be
levied by distress ; or in case he or she shall refuse or neglect to pay the said sum, or
goods and chattels cannot be found whereof to levy the same by distress, he or she
shall suffer six days’ imprisonment in the house of correction of the proper county :
1 Purd, 1952,
See act 26 April 1855, increasing the pen-
alty, in Allegheny county, to $25, and the alter-
gheny county. Pamph. 817. For form of con-
viction, see tit. “ Profaneness.” The act 15 May
1850 2 6, Pamph. 773, provided, that the pen-
native imprisonment to not less than ten nor
more than thirty days; and giving jurisdiction
to the mayors of Pittsburg and Allegheny, and
the burgesses of the several boroughs in that
county. Pamph. 821. The act 4 May 1864 au-
thorizes the sale of milk, on Sunday in Alle-
alty inflicted by this section should be paid into
the treasury of the commonwealth, for the use
of the sinking fund; and since the passage of
that act, the informer is entitled to no part of
the penalty. Q. 8S. Phila., 8 Nov. 1853. MS.
SUNDAY. 855
Provided always, That nothing herein contained shall be construed to prohibit the
dressing of victuals in private families, bake-houses, lodging-houses, inns and other
houses of entertainment, for the use of sojourners, travellers or strangers, or to hinder
watermen from landing their passengers, or ferrymen from carrying over the waters
travellers or persons removing with their families on the Lord’s day, commonly called
Sunday, nor to the delivery of milk or the necessaries of life before nine o’clock in
the forenoon, nor after five in the afternoon of the same day.
Srcr. 4. Provided always, That every such prosecution shall be commenced within
seventy-two hours after the offence shall be committed.
Act 25 Marcu 1805. Purd. 1952.
Sxct. 1. It shall be lawful for the select and common councils of the city of Phila-
delphia, the corporation of the district of Southwark and the commissioners of the
incorporated part of the Northern Liberties, respectively, to make, ordain and pass
such ordinance or ordinances as they may judge proper for the better regulation of the
markets holden in the said city and districts aforesaid, on the first day of the week,
commonly called Sunday.
Sect. 2. So much of the act passed the 22d day of April, one thousand eight hun-
dred and ninety-four, entitled ‘‘ An act for the prevention of vice and immorality,
and for other purposes,’’ as relates to the sale of the necessaries of life, on the first
day of the week, commonly called Sunday, so far as respects the city and districts
aforesaid, be and the same is hereby repealed.’
IV. Act 31 May 1893. Purd. 987.
Srcr. 2. Whenever the first day of January, the twenty-second day of February,
the fourth day of July or the twenty-fifth day of December shall any of them occur on
Sunday, the following day, Monday, shall be deemed and declared a public holiday.
All bills of exchange, checks, drafts or promissory notes falling due on any of the
Mondays so observed as holidays, shall be due and payable on the next succeeding
secular or business day, and all Mondays so observed as holidays shall, for all purposes
whatever as regards the presenting for payment or acceptance, and as regards the
protesting and giving notice of the dishonor of bills of exchange, checks, drafts and
promissory notes, made after the passage of this act, be treated and considered as is
the first day of the week, commonly called Sunday.
When the thirtieth day of May falls on Sunday, the day preceding it, Saturday,
shall be observed as the holiday, and the payment of bills of exchange, checks, drafts
and promissory notes, due and payable on such holiday, shall be made on the next
succeeding secular or business day. |
Sect. 3. All bills of exchange, checks, drafts and promissory notes made after the
passage of this act, which by the terms thereof shall be payable on the first day of the
week, commonly called Sunday, shall be deemed to be and shall be payable on the
next succeeding secular or business day.
V. Act 26‘ Frespruary 1855. Purd. 1952.
Szct. 1. It shell not be lawful for any person or persons to sell, trade or barter in
any spirituous or malt liquors, wine or cider, on the first day of the week, commonly
called Sunday; or for the keeper or keepers of any hotel, inn, tavern, ale-house,
‘beer-house, or other public house or place, knowingly to allow or permit any spiritu-
1The act 22 April 1829, P. L. 226, extends this legislation to the Kensington district of the
Northern Liberties. 44 L. I. 492.
856 SUNDAY.
ous or malt liquors, wine or cider, to be drank on or within the premises or house
occupied or kept by such keeper or keepers, his, her or their agents or servants, on
the said first day of the week. : .
Sror. 2. Any person or persons violating the provisions of the foregoing section.
shall for each and every offence, forfeit and pay the sum of fifty dollars, one-half of
which shall be paid to the prosecutor, and the other half to the guardians of the
poor of the city or county in which suit is brought, or in counties having no guard-
ians of the poor, then to the overseers of the poor of the township, ward or borough
in which the offeace was committed ;! to be recovered before any mayor, alderman,
burgess or justice of the peace, as debts of like amount are now by law recoverable,
in any action of debt brought in the name of the commonwealth, as well for the use
of the guardians of the poor (or for the overseers of the poor of the township, ward or
borough, as the case may be) as for the person suing: Provided, That when any
prosecutor is himself a witness, on any trial under the provisions of this section,
then the whole penalty or forfeiture shall be paid to the guardians or overseers as
aforesaid: And provided further, That it shall be a misdemeanor in office, for any
such mayor, alderman, burgess or justice of the peace, to neglect to render to the
said guardians of the poor and prosecutor the amount of such penalty, within ten
days from the payment of the same.
Sxor. 3. In addition to the civil penalties imposed by the last preceding section,
for a violation of the provisions of the first section of this act, every person who
shall violate the provisions of that section, shall be taken and deemed to have com-
raitted a misdemeanor, and shall on conviction thereof, in any criminal court in this
commonwealth, be fined in any sum not less than ten, nor more than one hundred
dollars, and be imprisoned in the county jail for a period not less than ten, nor more
than sixty days, at the discretion of the court.
VI. Profanation of the Lord’s day, is an offence against God and religion, For,
besides the notorious indecency and scandal of permitting any secular business to
be publicly transacted on that day, in a country professing Christianity, and the
corruption of morals which usually follows its profanation, the keeping one day in
the seven holy as a time of relaxation and refreshment, as well as for public worship,
is of admirable service to a state, considered merely as a civil institution. It enables
the industrious workman to pursue his occupation in the ensuing week with health
and cheerfulness ; it imprints on the minds of the people that sense of their duty
to God, so necessary to make them good citizens ; but which yet would be worn out
and defaced by an unremitted continuance of labor, without any stated times of
recalling them to the worship of thrir Maker?
Legal process cannot be issued on a Sunday, except for treason, felony or breach
of the peace.* It seems, that any criminal process may be executed on a Sunday, as
every crime involves a breach of the peace.®
A judgment is not erroneous because the verdict on which it was rendered was
delivered on Sunday. A principal may be taken up by his bail on Sunday.’
Parliament may sit on Sunday.’ A will may be made on Sunday.®
VII. OF CONTRACTS MADE ON SUNDAY.
A contract made on Sunday is void.” A promissory note given on Sunday is void,
and no action can be sustained upon it."
Tn an action on a contract for the sale of a chattel, proof by defendant, that it
was received by the vendee on Sunday, from a third person, does not raise such a
presumption that the contract was made on Sunday as will defeat the plaintiffs
action.’?
1 The act 29 April 1867, Purd. 1953, provides, 418. & R. 351.
that all penalties, fines and forfeitures imposed, 5 See ante, title ‘ Justices of the Peace.”
incurred or paid under this act, except so far as 63 W. 56. 3 Brewst. 402. Lewis’ Cr. L, 422,
e thereof is payable to the prosecutor, shall T1 Atk, 239.
© paid over to the guardians, &c., of the poor 581 W. BI. 499.
of the place in which the offence was committed. 955 Penn. St. 183.
2 This statute is not repealed by the general 101 Bro. 171. 6 W. 231. 3 W.& 8.446. 55
act of 1875. 104 Penn. St. 179. Vater it, the Penn. St. 325.
court, on conviction must impose both fineand 16 W. 231. 5 Ala. 467.
imprisonment; it has no discretion. 1 Wood. 44, BIW. &S8. 477,
34 Bl. Com. 64,
SUNDAY. 857
Under the act of the 22d April 1794, a contract made on Sunday for the hire of
horses to be used on an excursion of pleasure, on that or any other day is void,
and the hirer cannot recover. Under the same act, a contract nade on Saturday for
the hire of horses to be used on an excursion of pleasure on Sunday, is void, and
plaintiff cannot recover. But the hire of a carriage on a Sunday by a son to visit
his father, creates a legal contract.? ‘ The visit to his father by the defendant, was
discharging a filial duty, which nothing in the law hinders or forbids.”> _
A contract for the publication of an advertisement in a newspaper to be issued
and sold on Sunday, is void.
A bond executed on Sunday is not void at common law, but by reason of the
statute.© A bond is not perfected until delivery; hence a mere signing on Sunday
does not render it void, if not delivered until the day following®
A contract of marriage made on Sunday is legal (especially if there be a subse-
quent recognition of it) and an action will lie for the breach."
A contract made on Sunday is not invalid at common law. Contracts made on
Sunday are not void on religious or moral grounds, but upon the familiar and estab-
lished doctrine, that where a statute inflicts a penalty for doing an act (no matter
what that act may be) a court of justice will not enforce a contract made in viola-
tion of such statute, and in the making of which, the parties to it incurred the pre-
scribed penalty. A penalty implies a prohibition of the thing itself, in the doing
of which the penalty is to accrue. But if a contract made on the Lord’s day be
valid by the laws of the state in which it was made, it will be enforced in any state
though the laws of the latter state would avoid it?
VIII. Breacu oF THE Lorp’s DAY.
The proper mode of procedure, under the act of 22d April 1794, against persons
who perform worldly employment on Sunday, is by conviction, and not by a gut tam
action. The offence of working on Sunday does not amount to a breach of the
peace." A justice of the peace, who is authorized, by the act of 1794, to convict
on view of a breach of the Sabbath, cannot enter forcibly into the premises of
another where the breach is committed, to obtain a view.”
Persons who profess the Jewish religion, and others who keep the seventh day
as their Sabbath, are not exempted from the penalties inflicted by the act upon
those who do worldly employment on Sunday.¥ Travelling is not within the pro-
hibition of the act of 1794.1
Under our act, which is broader than the British statute, the selling of goods out
of a person’s store on Sunday, renders him liable to a separate penalty for each
act of selling to a different customer.”
When three or more persons agree to go to a church where divine service is to be
performed, and to laugh and talk during the performance of the same, in a manner
which might be excusable in a tavern; and in so doing manifest a determination
to resist by force any effort that may be made to remove them or prevent their so
doing, they will be guilty of riot. It seems, that the unnecessary performance
of secular labors on Sunday, in such a way as to disturb the worship of others, is
indictable in Pennsylvania.’
The performance of worldly business on Sunday, does not amount to a breach of
the peace ; unless it be carried on in public, and in such a manner as to disturb those
who keep it as a day of rest and religious observance. The crying of newspapers in
the public streets on Sunday is a breach of the peace.” ;
Driving a public conveyance for the transportation of passengers, is nota work of
necessity, within the exception of the act of 1794.° The running of passenger cars
on a city railroad on Sunday, by reason of the noise and disturbance accompanying
12M. 402. 1035. & R. 48.
2 6 Penn. St. 417. Ml 1 Ibid. 350.
3 Thid. 420, Coulter, J. 12 Tid. 347.
494.N. Y. 353. y 13 3 Ibid. 48. 8 Penn. St. 312.
53W.4&S. 444. 4558. & R. 302.
6 2 Penn. St. 448. 15 42 Leg. Int. 90. 2 Pears. 213,
72 Penny. 187. 164 Clark 1. Bright. 44.
86W. 231. 3W.&S. 444. 17 1 Phila. 460. /
9 33 Am. L. Reg. 378. 18 22 Penn. St.102. 54 Ibid. 401. 2 Gr. 506,
858 SURETY OF THE PEACH.
it, may amount to a breach of the peace! The travelling which is not forbidden by
the statute is that by private conveyance; the running of public conveyances 1s
within the prohibition.?
The sale of liquor by an innkeeper, to a sojourner, on Sunday, is within the pro-
hibition of the act of 1794.5 But such offence is not indictable as the keeping of a
tippliug or disorderly house; it is only punishable under the act of 1794.*
It is not a violation of the act of 1794 for a hired domestic servant to drive his
employer’s family to church, on the Lord’s day, in the employer’s private convey-
ance’ But the business of a barber in shaving his customers on Sunday morning,
is a violation of the act.
On no individual is the obligation stronger than on a magistrate, to promote, by
all due means, the influence of’ religion. The course of his duty presents many
occasions in which he may properly diffuse a sense of piety, and a detestation of vice.
He should uniformly administer oaths with that solemnity and respect which the
important nature of the ceremony demands; and he should take pains to instruct
the careless and profligate with respect to the obligations incurred, the heavy guilt
of perjury, and the impossibility of escaping future punishment by evasive acts or
mental equivocation. It depends upon magistrates principally to enforce those laws
which are intended to suppress crimes in direct disobedience to the plainest precepts
of the gospel, namely, profane swearing, breach of the Lord’s day and drunkenness.
This duty is particularly confided to them—and it is impossible to reconcile the
neglect of it with that obligation and responsibility which attached to them the
moment they qualified. But if, instead of punishing such crimes, magistrates should
themselves commit them, and thereby extend their pernicious influence through the
community, how severely ought such conduct to be reprobated! how deplorable
must be the condition of a country whose morals are committed to the safeguard of
such faithless agents !"
Surety of the Peace,
I. The law and judicial authorities. IL. Form of a warrant and commitment.
I. Act 31 Marca 1860. Purd. 539
Sxzor. 6. If any person shall threaten the person of another to wound, kill or
destroy him, or to do him any harm in person or estate, and the person threatened
shall appear before a justice of the peace, and attest, on oath or affirmation, that he
believes that, by such threatening, he is in danger of being hurt in body or estate,
such person so threatening as aforesaid shall be bound over, with one sufficient
surety, to appear at the next sessions, according to law, and in the mean time to be
of his good behavior, and keep the peace toward all citizens of this commonwealth,
If any person, not being an officer on duty in the military or naval service of the
state or of the United States, shall go armed with a dirk, dagger, sword or pistol, or
other offensive or dangerous weapon, without reasonable cause to fear an assault
or other injury or violence to his family, person or property, he may, on complaint of
any person having reasonable cause to fear a breach of the peace therefrom, be
required to find surety of the peace as aforesaid .
SURETY OF THE PEACE, so called because the party that was in fear is thereby
secured. ‘This security consists in [the person complained of ] being bound with
one or more sureties, in a recognisance or obligation to the king [commonwealth]
entered on record and taken in some court, or by some judicial officer, whereby the
parties acknowledge themselves to be indebted to the crown [the commonwealth]
12 Gr. 506. See 3 Phila. 509. 4 34 Penn. St. 86.
2 22 Penn. St, 102. 5 Thid. 398,
5 21 Ibid. 426. But he may sell ice-cream to 6 1 Pears. 61. 1 Leg. Gaz. R.491. 1 CL &
others than sojourners, travellers or strangers. 15 Fin. 234,
W. N.C. 316. 7 1 Car. L. Repos, 453.
‘
SURETY OF THE PRAOCE. 859
in the sum required [for instance $100], with condition to be void and of none
effect, if the party shall appear in court on such a day, and in the mean time shall
keep the peace either generally towards the king and all his liege people [to all the
citizens of the commonwealth], and particularly also with regard to the person who
craves the security.
Surety of the peace is demandable of right by any individual who will make the
necessary oath,’ that is, will swear that A. B. has threatened to do him “ harm in
person or estate,” and that he believes “he is in danger to be hurt in body or
estate.” But surety of the peace ought not to be granted on account of a past
beating, unless there be fear of future danger ; the remedy in such case being by
action or indictment.®
A committing magistrate has no authority to bind a person to keep the peace, or
for his good behavior, longer than the next term of the court.‘
Surety for good behavior may be ordered by the court, after the acquittal of a
prisoner, in such sum, and for such length of time as the public safety requires.®
II. Copy oF A WARRANT FOR THREATS,
BRADFORD COUNTY, ss.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To the Constable of the township of S——, in the county of Bradford, greeting:
Wuereas, J. D., of the township of H——, in the county of Bradford, tavern-keeper,
hath this day made oath before G. H., Esquire, one of the justices of the peace in and for
the county of Bradford, that R. R., of the township of S , in the said county, black-
smith, hath threatened to do him harm in person or estate, and that, by reason of such
threatening, he believes he is in danger to be hurt in body or estate : You are therefore
hereby commanded to take the said R. R., and bring him before the said J. R., to answer
the said complaint. Witness the said G@. H., at S—— township aforesaid, the first day of
October, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and eighty.
G. H., Justice of the Peace. [szat.]
COMMITMENT.
BRADFORD COUNTY, ss. ;
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To the Constable of the township of H——, in the county of Bradford, and to the keeper
of the common jail of the said county, greeting :
Wuereas, R. R., of the township of S——, in the said county, blacksmith, hath been
brought before G. H., Esquire, one of our justices of the peace in and for the said county,
by virtue of a warrant issued on the oathof J. D.: And whereas, the said R, R. hath
refused to find sufficient surety to keep the peace towards all our citizens, but especially
towards the said J. D.: These are therefore to command you, the said constable, to con-
vey the said R. R. to the common jail of the said county, and deliver him to the keeper
thereof, who is hereby enjoined to receive the said R. R., and keep him in safe custody
until he find sufficient surety as aforesaid, or be otherwise legally discharged. Witness
the said G. H., at H—— township, aforesaid, the fifth day of October, in the year of our
Lord one thousand eight hundred and eighty.
G. H., Justice of the Peace. |szau.]
14 Bl, Com. 252. 4 2 Pars. 458. See ante, p. 360.
21 Binn. 102 n. 5 2Y. 487. 10 Penn. St. 339. 2 Hayw. 73-4.
8 1 Ash. 140. See 11 Cl. & Fin. 155.
[ 860 ]
Swine,
I. To be yoked, &o., if at large. Application IV. Regulations in certain towns.
may be made to a justice. V. The act extended.
IL. Who shall advertise the swine. VI. Judicial decisions and forms.
IIL. Proceedings, if no owner appear.
Aot or 1705. Purd. 1959.
Sror. 1. No swine shall be suffered to run at large, without rings and yokes, under
the penalty of forfeiting half the value thereof, to the use hereafter expressed ;
therefore, if any persons shall find on his, her or their lands, within fourteen miles
of the navigable parts of the river Delaware, avy swine, hog or hogs, shoat or
shoats, pig or pigs, without rings in their noses, sufficient to prevent their turning
up the ground, and triangular or three-cornered yokes or bows about their necks,
and to extend at least six inches from the angular point or corner, sufficient to
keep them from breaking through fences, it shall and may be lawful for him, her
or them, all such swine, hogs, shoats or pigs, to kill, and take, and drive and carry
away, or to cause them to be killed, taken, driven or carried away: and being so
taken and carried away, the said takers shall forthwith acquaint a justice of the
peace thereof, and being by him legally attested, that the said swine were taken as
aforesaid, without yokes or bows and rings, the said justice shall immediately appoint
and order two indifferent persons of the neighbourhood, to view and make a just and
reasonable appraisement of all such swine, hogs, shoats or pigs, and to make return
of their value, number and marks, unto the said justice of the peace, as soon as
conveniently it may be done, after such appraisement ; one moiety or half the value
whereof shall be forfeit to the person or persons, owners or possessors of such lands
where found and taken; and he or they that shall take up such swine as aforesaid,
shall pay unto the said justice of the peace, for the use of the owner or owners of
such swine, the other moiety or half part thereof; and thereupon the property
of all such swine shall be and remain in the said owner or possessor of land as afore-
said, to his and there own proper use for ever.
IL. Szor. 2. Such justice of the peace shall make publication thereof, by a paper
affixed on his house, and on some tree near the high-road side, declaring the num-
ber, marks and appraisement of all such swine, and by whom taken up, to the end
that the owners may have notice thereof; unto whom the said justice of the peace
shall pay the other moiety or half the value of such swine taken and appraised, he
first deducting out of the same two shillings for the appraisers [and two shillings
for the justice’s clerk], for their trouble therein; but if it so happen, that the moiety
or half part, as appraised, will not pay the said four shillings, then such takers up
shall pay what shall be wanting thereof.
III. Szor. 3. Provides, that if the moiety of such swine is not claimed by any
person, within twelve months after appraisement, the justice shall pay what money
he has received, deducting charges, unto the overseers of the poor of the township
where taken up, for the use of the poor of the said township, and the owners of
such swine shall be thereupon debarred from any claim or right to the same.
IV. Szor. 4. Prohibits any swine to go at large in the towns of Philadelphia,
Chester or Bristol, whether yoked and ringed or not; and if found running at
large, they shall be forfeit, one half to him or them that shall take up the same,
and the other half to the use of the poor of the respective towns, to be paid to the
overseers according to the use aforesaid ; the said town of Bristol being all the space
contained within half a mile square from the Mill creek up the river Delaware.
V. Aor10 May 1729. Purd. 1960.
Sror. 1. The same penalties, rules and orders, enacted and directed to be observed
by the (preceding) act, within fourteen miles of the navigable parts of Delaware
river, shall be in force and extended throughout the province [commonwealth] of
Pennsylvania.
SWINE. 861
VI. Unless swine be ranning at large, they cannot be proceeded against under
the act of 1705, and the appraisement must so state the fact; swine escaping from
their owner and caught on another’s land are not liable to be killed
A justice has no authority to adjudge a forfeiture, unless everything required
by the statute to give him such authority appears. Under this act, it must appear by
the record, that the person giving the information was “legally attested” by the
justice that the hog was taken up running at large without yoke, or bow or ring
The act 1705 being a highly penal one, the remedy must be strictly pursued;
the party on whose land hogs are found without rings and yokes, may kill them
outright ; but he may not do another act by which they subsequently die.®
The record of the justice must show that the swine were suffered to go at large,
in order to confer jurisdiction.‘ If they were running at large, without default of
the owner, they are not subject to forfeiture.
INFORMATION, ON OATH OF THE TAKER.
DAUPHIN COUNTY, ss.
Berore me, one of the justices of the peace in and for the county of Dauphin, person-
ally came D. W., of the township of W——, in the said county, yeoman, and, being duly
sworn, did depose and say, that upon the fifteenth day of December, instant, he found .
upon his lands, situate in the township aforesaid, three hogs and two shoats, without rings
in their noses, and yoke or bows about their necks, which had been suffered so to go astray
by their owner, and the same being then and there found, did kill and take (or drive and
carry away). And further saith not. D. W.
Sworn and subscribed, December 17th, 1880. Before me, J. B.
APPOINTMENT OF THE APPRAISERS.
To J. D. and R. R., of the township of W——, in the county of Dauphin, greeting :
Waerzas, D. W., of W-—— township aforesaid, yeoman, hath this day made oath before
me, one of the justices of the peace in and for the county of Dauphin, that, upon the
fifteenth day of December, instant, he found upon his lands, situated in the township
aforesaid, three hogs and two shoats, without rings in their noses, and yokes or bows about
their necks, which had been suffered so to go at large by their owner, and the same being
then and there found, did kill and take (or drive and carry away)—I do therefore appoint
and order you, the said J. D. and R. R., to view and make a just and reasonable appraise-
ment of all such hogs and shoats as aforesaid, and make return of their value, number
and marks to me as soon as convenient. Witness my hand and seal, at W township
aforesaid, the seventeenth day of December, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight
hundred and eighty. J. P., Justice of the Peace. rane
RETURN OF THE APPRAISERS.
To J. P., Esquire, one of the justices of the peace in and for the county of Dauphin :
In obedience to your order of the seventeenth instant, we now make return, that we
have viewed the hogs and shoats therein mentioned, and find that the number of the
former is three, and that of the latter two—that two of the said hogs are entirely white, and
the third, which is the largest of the whole, has a large black mark upon his right side—that
the two shoats are black and white mixed : and that they are worth eleven dollars in the
whole, that is to say, nine dollars for the three hogs, and two dollars for the two shouts.
Witness our hands, December the 19th, a. pv. 1880. (Signed) a :
PUBLICATION TO BE MADE BY THE JUSTICE.
Pustic notice is hereby given to all persons whom it doth or may concern, that on the
seventeenth day of December, instant, D. W., of the township of W——, in the county
of Dauphin, and state of Pennsylvania, yeoman, appeareth before me, J. P., Esquire,
one of the justices of the peace in and for the said county, and made oath, that upon the
fifteenth day of December, instant, he found upon his lands situate in the township afore-
said, three hogs and two shoats, without rings in their noses and yokes or bows about their
necks, which had been suffered so to go at large by their owner, and the same being then
and there found, he, the said deponent, did kill and take (or drive and carry away). In
pursuance whereof, I, the said justice, did, by my warrant, appoint and order J. D. and
1108. & R. 393. See 46 Penn. St, 147. 4 2 Chest. Co. R. 575.
2 58 Penn. St. 496. 5 2 L. Law Rev. 305.
32
L. Law Rev. 297.
862 TELEGRAMS.
R. R., two indifferent persons of the neighborhood, that is to say, of the same township,
to view and make a just and reasonable appraisement of all such hogs and shoats as afore-
said, and make return of their value, number and marks unto me, as soon as conveniently
it might be done after such appraisement. Whereupon, the said J. D. and R. R. did, upon
the nineteenth day of December, instant, make return, that they had viewed the said
hogs and shoats, and found the number of the former to be three, and that of the latter
two—that two of the said hogs are entirely white, and the third, which is the largest of the
whole, has a large black mark upon his right side—that the two shoats are black and white
miced—and that they are worth eleven dollars in the whole, that is to say, nine dollars
for the three hogs, and two dollars for the two shoats. And whereas, it is directed that
* one moiety or half the value of all such hogs and shoats as may be killed, and taken,
and driven, and carried away as aforesaid, shall be forfeit to the owners or possessors of
such lands where found, and he or they shall pay unto the justice of the peace before
whom information shall have been made, for the use of the owners of such swine, the
other moiety or half part thereof, and thereupon the property of all such swine shall be
and remain in the said owner or possessor of land as aforesaid, to his and their own
proper use for ever.” In conformity to the said act, the aforesaid D. W. hath this day
aid unto me, the said justice, the sum of five dollars and fifty cents, being one moiety or
aif the appraised value of such hogs and shoats, so found as aforesaid, for the use of the
owner or owners of such swine, which said sum (first deducting out of the same all legal
eosts) 1 have in my hands ready to pay to such persons as may be entitled thereto, if
claimed within twelve months, otherwise the said sum of five dollars and fifty cents (after
deducting all legal costs as aforesaid) will be paid to the overseers of the poor of the
township of W—— aforesaid, for the use of the poor of the said township, and the vwners
of such swine will be thereupon debarred from any claim or right to the same. Given
under my hand, at W: township aforesaid, the twenty-first day of December, in the
year of our Lord 1880. J. P., Justice of the Peace.
Celeqrams.
I. Acts of assembly. III. Judicial decisions.
II. Provisions of the Penal Code.
I. Act 29 Marcu 1849. Purd. 2001.
THE various telegraph companies within the limits of this state (shall) be
required to forward and receive over their lines, all messages that may be offered
for transmission, by individuals or incorporated companies: Provided, The
parties offering such messages or dispatches, tender for the transmission thereof,
the amount of the usual fee for such transmission. And in case of a refusal or
neglect on the part of any of the agents of the telegraph lines in this state to
send or receive in their regular order, except as hereinbefore excepted, such mes-
sages or dispatches, by telegraph, the company shall be liable to a fine of one
hundred dollars for each and every message so refused or neglected, to be sued for
and recovered before any justice of the peace of this commonwealth, as debts of
like amount are recovered; the one-half of said fine to go to the state, and the other
half to the party suing for the same: And provided further, That in any suit to
be brought for the recovery of said fine, notice served on the president, director,
agent or either of them, shall be sufficient.
Aor 14 Aprin 1851. Purd. 2001.
It shall not be lawful for any person connected with any line of telegraph
within this commonwealth, whether as superintendent, operator or in any other
capacity whatsoever, to use or cause to be used, or make known or cause to be made
known, the contents of any dispatch, of whatsoever nature, which may be sent or
retcived over any line of telegraph in this commonwealth, without the consent
or direction of either the party sending or receiving the same; and all dispatches
which may be filed at any office in this commonwealth for transmission to any point
shall be so transmitted without being made public, or their purport in any manner
divulged, at any intermediate point, on any pretence whatever ; and in all respects,
the same inviolable secrecy, safe-keeping and conveyance shall be maintained by
the officers and agents employed upon the several telegraph lines of this common-
TELEGRAMS. 863
wealth, in relation to all dispatches which may be sent or received as is now enjoined
by the laws of the United States, in reference to the ordinary mail service: Pro-
vided, That nothing in this act contained shall be so construed as to prevent the
publication, at any point, of any dispatch of a public nature which may be sent by
any person or persons with a view to general publicity.
Aor 8 May 1855. Purd. 2002.
It shall be the duty of all owners, superintendents and operators, to preserve
the originals of all messages sent from such office, other than those intended for
publication, for at least three years, and to produce the same in evidence, when-
soever duly subpeenaed to do so, by the individual or individuals, or counsel of the
individual or individuals, sending or receiving a copy of such messages, in any court
of justice, or before any committee of the legislature, and where the same shall be
decided by such court or committee to be material to any issue or matter there to
be tried or determined, under the like penalty as in other cases: Provided, That
the confidential communications between attorney and client, so transmitted, shall
in no case be divulged.
II. Act 31 Marca 1860. Purd. 540.
Sror. 72. If any superintendent, operator or other person, who may be engaged
in any telegraph line, shall use, or cause to be used, or make known, or cause to be
made known, the contents of any dispatch, or any part thereof, sent from or received
at any telegraph office in this commonwealth, or in anywise unlawfully expose
another’s business or secret, or in anywise impair the value of any correspondence
so sent or received, such person shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and, on convic-
tion, be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars, and to undergo
an imprisonment not exceeding six months, or both, or either, at the discretion of
the court.
Szcr. 176.’ If any person, whether an operator in any telegraph office or other-
wise, shall knowingly send or cause to be sent, by telegraph, any false or forged
message as from such office, or as from any other person, knowing the same to be
false, forged or counterfeited, with intent to deceive, injure or defraud any indi-
vidual or body corporate, such offender, on conviction, shall be guilty of a misde-
meanor, and be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars, and
undergo an imprisonment not exceeding one year.
III. The 72d section of the Penal Code only make the offender liable where he
unlawfully exposes the secrets of the telegraph office; when it is done wantonly
or voluntarily ; it does not apply to cases where such disclosures become material
in a court of justice.?
Telegraph companies holding themselves out to transmit dispatches correctly,
are bound to do so, or respond in damages, unless the causes of failure are beyond
their control.2 A telegraph company is liable in damages, to the recipient of a
message, for the misfeasance of their agent, in sending a different message from that
addressed to him.’ ef
If a telegraphic message be sent, subject to the express condition, that the com-
pany will not be liable for mistakes arising from any cause, unless the message be
repeated back, for which a higher rate of compensation is charged, the sender is
bound by his contract, and cannot recover, unless he bring himself within the terms
of the company’s undertaking.‘ ftw ;
But the company is not excused from liability to a third person, for damages
sustained by the negligent transmission of an erroneous message, by the fact that
the sender did not pay for its being repeated back; especially where the mistake
consisted in transmitting a different message from the one ordered.
1 2 Pars. 274. . 4 78 Penn. St. 238. 17 C. B. 3.
21Am. L. Reg. 685. 43 Leg. Int. 139. > 35 Penn. St. 298. Butsee2 L. R., C. P. 62.
835 Penn. St. 298. See 55 Ibid. 262. 102 4 Ibid., Q. B. 706.
Ibid. 164. 14 W. N.C. 535. 98 Mass. 232.
‘
[ 864 ]
ender.
I, Acts of assembly. IL. Judicial decisions.
L In all cases where a tender shall be made, and full payment offered, by discount
or otherwise, in such specie as the party by contract or agreement ought to do, and
the party to whom such tender shall be made doth refuse the same, and yet after-
wards will sue for the debt or goods as tendered, the plaintiff shall not recover any
costs in such suit.} -
‘In all actions for the recovery of money, founded on contract hereafter brought,
in any of the courts of this commonwealth, or before any of the justices of the
peace or aldermen thereof, the defendant or defendants therein shall have the right,
at any time before trial in court, to make to the plaintiff or plaintiffs a tender of
lawful money equal to the amount he or they shall admit to be due, with all lawful
costs incurred in said action, up to the date of making such tender ; and if the party
to whom such tender shall be made, refuses to accept the same, then in the event
of the plaintiff or plaintiffs failing to recover more than the principal sum so as
aforesaid tendered, with legal interest thereon, he or they shall pay all the costs
legally incurred in the said action, after the time of the tender aforesaid : Provided,
that the said defendant or defendants shall be required to keep up said tender at
every trial of the action aforesaid, and may pay the money into court on leave
obtained, but shall not be required to preserve or pay in the identical money
originally tendered.?
II. Zender, the offering of money or any other thing in satisfaction; or circum-
spectly to endeavor the performance of a thing; as a tender of rent, is to offer it at
the time and place when and where it ought to be paid.’
A legal tender can only be made in the lawful money of the United States (gold
or silver, or paper money made a legal tender by act of congress) ; hence an offer of
bank notes is invalid ; but if such offer be made and not objected to on that ground,
but specifically on some other account, the tender would be good.‘
A mere offer to pay the money is not, in legal strictness, a tender; nor is the
defendant entitled to the advantage of a tender unless he plead it, and bring the
money into court.® A tender of the sum due does not amount to an actual pay-
ment and discharge; but it suspends the interest and a subsequent demand and
refusal.$
No tender is a substantial one but a legal tender; and the only effect of a tender
and a refusal, where the plaintiff has a direct cause of action, is to expose the plain-
tiff to the loss of costs, if the defendant plead the tender, and bring the money into
court."
If a man be bound to do a thing, he must either do it, or offer to do it; if no
objections are made, he must show that he made the tender in a regular manner;
but this is not necessary, if the other party, by his conduct, dispense with a regular
tender, by a previous refusal to accept it.®
A party who has aright to object to a tender, is not precluded from availing
himself of this objection, by the circumstance that his motive for objecting was, not:
the tender, but a desire on other grounds to get rid of the contract.®
“ deponit in bank of funds to meet a particular demand is equivalent to a
tender.
A contract for the delivery of specific articles of property to another, at a certain
time and place, in discharge of a private debt, is performed, and the debt satisfied
by a tender and delivery of the property at the time and place, although the payee
1 Act of 1705 3 2. Purd. 669. 6 1 Dall. 407.
2 Act 12 March 1867. Purd. 2004, 7108. & R. 14
3 Termes de la Ley 557. 8 Pet. C. CO. 24.
4558S. & R. 326. 1 R. 415. See 2 Greenl. Evid. 96S. & R. 323
2 601 10 5 Whart. 508
5 2 Dall. 190.
THEATRES. 865
did not attend to receive the property; and no action can afterwards be main-
tained against the debtor on the contract.
To render a tender effectual and legal, it must be unqualified, and not be fettered
with any condition? A tender of a quarter’s rent, coupled with a demand of a
receipt to a particular day (the contest between the parties being whether one or
two quarters’ rent were due), is not a valid tender.’
On a contract executed, where a debt is due to a party, without the performance
of anything on his part, the debtor, in order to discharge himself from an action
for it, must show an actual tender, which must be pleaded at an early stage in the
cause, and the money brought into court.‘
—
Cheatres,
I. Acts of assembly. II. Judicial decisions.
I. Acr 22 May 1879. Purd. 103
Sscr. 1. It shall not be lawful to exhibit to the public in any building, garden,
grounds, concert-room, saloon or other place or room, within any city of the first
class, any interlude, tragedy, comedy, opera, ballet, play, farce, negro minstrelsy,
negro or other dancing, or any other entertainment of the stage, or any part
thereof, or any representation in which a drop curtain and scenery or theatrical
costumes are used, or any equestrian circus or dramatic performance, or any per-
formance of jugglers, rope-dancing or acrobats, or any menagerie, until a licence
for such exhibition, performance or entertainment shall have been first had and
obtained from the mayor of such city of the first class, by the proprietor thereof;
which licence shall be granted by him for each and every place or building
in which such exhibitions, performances or entertainments are held, upon the pay-
ment by said proprietor of the sum of twenty-five dollars for the whole or for any
portion of each calendar year: Provided, That before such licence shall be granted,
the said mayor shall be satisfied, by affidavit or otherwise, that the exhibition,
performance or entertainment for which the licence shall be applied, shall not
be immoral in its nature or tendencies, or otherwise unlawful or hurtful to the
community ; and every manager, proprietor or director of any such exhibition,
performance or entertainment, who shall neglect to take out such licence, or who
shall allow or cause any such exhibition, performance or entertainment without
such licence, and every owner or lessee of any building, room, garden, grounds,
concert-room or other place, who shall lease or let the same for the purpose of
any such exhibition, performance or entertainment, or shall assent to the use
thereof for any such purpose, except as permitted by such licence, and without
such licence having been previously obtained and then in force, shall be guilty of
a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof, shall be sentenced to pay a fine not
exceeding one hundred dollars, or undergo an imprisonment not exceeding three
months, or both, or either, at the discretion of the court.5
Szcr. 2. It shall not be lawful for any female to attend among or wait upon the
audience or spectators at any of the exhibitions, performances or entertainments
mentioned hereinbefore, or at any other place of public amusement in any city of
the first class, to procure, offer, furnish or distribute any description of commodities
or refreshments whatsoever ; nor shall it be luwful for any manager or proprietor
of any such exhibition, performance, entertainment or place of public amusement
to »mploy or permit the employment of any female to attend among or wait upon
the audience or spectators thereat, to procure, offer or distribute any description
of commodities or refreshments whatsoever ; and any person violating any, of the
provisions of this section, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction
thereof, shall be setenced to pay a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars, or
1 6 W. 262. 8 5 M. G. & Se. 428.
2 Gow 214. 2 Camp. 156. 5 C. & P. 50. y 4 27 Penn. St. 294.
D. & R. 119. 5 See also act 30 March 1864. Purd. 103.
55.
866 THEATRES.
uadergo an imprisonment not exceeding one year, or both, or either, at the discre-
tion of the court.
Szor. 3. It shall be lawful for the mayor of any city of the first class, upon proof
satisfactory to him, by affidavit, under oath or affirmation, of the violation of any
of the provisions of this act, or of any other act of assembly or ordinance of such
city regulating places of amusement, or that the exhibition, performances, enter-
tainments, or any of them, given under color of said licence, are or have been
immoral or unlawful, to vacate, annul and render void and of no effect any licence
which shall have been obtained as aforesaid, by any manager, proprietor, owner or
lessee, for the holding such exhibition, performance or entertainment, or allowing
or letting any part of a building or other premises for the purpose thereof; and it
shall alao be lawful for the said mayor to prevent any such exhibition, performance
or entertainment from being held, exhibited or performed, until the licence herein-
before provided for shall be paid, or if the same shall have been annulled or vacated
for violation of any of the provisions of this act, or otherwise: and to that end
to direct the police to close the building, room or other place in which the said
exhibition, performance or entertainment is intended to be held, and prevent the
entrance of auditors or spectators.’
Sxcr. 4. All sums of moneys received in payment for licences under this act,
shall be paid into the treasury of the said city for municipal purposes; and it
is hereby enacted, that nothing in this act contained shall in anywise be taken or
deemed to revoke, modify or interfere with the provisions of the several acts
of the general assembly requiring licence from the state for theatrical or other
exhibitions: Provided, That if any person or persons applying to the mayor for
a licence as aforesaid, shall be aggrieved by the action of said mayor, in refusing
to grant such licence, or in revoking any licence, such person or persons shall
have the right of appealing to the court of quarter sessions, which court shall, as
soon as possible, hear and determine the same as to said court may seem just and
right.
Aor 9 Juty 1881. Purd. 106.
Szor. 1. No licence for the sale of vinous, spirituous, malt or brewed liquors, or
any admixtures thereof, in any quantity, shall be granted to the proprietors, lessees,
keepers or managers of any theatre, circus, museum or other place of amusement,
nor shall any house be licensed for the sale of such liquors, or any of them, or any
admixtures thereof, which has passage or communication to or with any theatre,
circus, museum or other place of amusement; and any licence granted contrary to
this act shall be null and void. :
Szor. 2. The proprietor, lessee, keeper or manager of any theatre, circus, museum,
or other place of amusement, or any other person, who shall violate the provisions of
this act, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof, shall be
sentenced to pay a fine of one hundred dollars, and to undergo an imprisonment of
not less than thirty days.
Aot 1 June 1883. Purd. 105.
Szor. 1. It shall not be lawful for the proprietor of any public place of amuse-
ment or resort, to perform or have exhibited, the shooting of a person from a cata-
pult or other machine, the throwing of knives at a performer, or the shooting at a
target held by or placed on the head or near the performer, or exhibitor, perform-
ing on a trapeze, without a strong netting below the performer, or any other feat or
performance that is extra-hazardous and jeopardizes the life or lives of any person
or persons; any person violating this act shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and on
conviction, shall pay a fine of five hundred dollars, or imprisonment, one or both,
at the discretion of the court.
Aor 13 Jung 1883. Purd. 105.
Szor. 1. It shall not be lawful for any person or persons to sell, barter or
exchange, or offer for sale, barter or exchange, upon the public streets or highways,
or in front of any threatre or place of amusement and entertainment, tickets of
admission to such theatre or place of amusement and entertainment.
1 Purd. 105. 2 Thid. 103, 3 Ibid. 104,
THEATRES. 867
Szor. 2. Any person or persons violating the provisions of this act of assembly,
shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and on conviction, shall be punished by a
fine of fifty dollars, and imprisonment, not exceeding three months, or either or
both, for every such offence.
Aot 14 Maron 1867. Purd. 104.
Seor. 1. It shall not be lawful for the owners or lessees of any public hall or
place of amusement, in the city of Philadelphia,’ to obstruct, or allow to be
obstructed by others, any of the aisles or passage-ways in the auditorium of said
halls or places of amusement, by placing therein any benches, chairs, stools or other
articles that may prevent free egress or ingress, during the hours that said places
may be open to the public.
Sect. 2. Said owners, lessees or other agents are hereby required to keep open,
at all hours during the time such halls or places of amusement are open to the pub-
lic, all doors giving means of ingress or egress, unless said doors open outwards from
said places, then the same may be closed; but no hindrance, such as locks or
catches of any kind, shall be allowed to obstruct or prevent instant and easy egress
through the same; and when said doors open inwards, it is required of such owners
or lessees, that the same be fastened securely and firmly open.?
Sct. 4. That a penalty of five hundred dollars be imposed upon the owners or
lessees of any of said public halls or places of amusement, who may, at any time,
violate any of the provisions of this act, to be recovered in like manner as penal-
ties for violation of any law are now enforced in the city of Philadelphia.’
II. The acts taxing theatres do not include opera companies.‘
An annual licence holds good until the end of the year, notwithstanding a change
in the ordinance under which it was granted 5
On appeal, the quarter sessions will only examine the question whether the mayor
has exercised a pure legal discretion in the premises.®
In Philadelphia, an indictment will lie for holding a theatrical exhibition, without
astate licence.’ But the acts requiring a state licence do not extend to any musical
or dramatic representations by amateurs, in Philadelphia or Pittsburgh, the net
proceeds of which are to be devoted to the relief and support of widows or orphans,
the wounded or the sick.®
The construction of theatres and opera houses is regulated by the act 8 June 1893
240. Purd. 1452-8.
1 ‘The 6th section extends the provisions of this
act to the cities of Pittsburgh and Allegheny ; and
by act 18 February 1870, it is extended to the city
of Altoona. Pamph. 167.
2 The 3d section requires the principal theatres
of Philadelphia, in addition, to keep attached to
8 plug or water-attachment, during the time they
are open to the public, sufficient fire-hose to reach
to their furthest limits. Pamph. 441.
8 The 5th section requires the building inspect-
ora to enforce this act, on the complaint of any
citizen; and distributes the penalty, one-half to
the informer, and one-half to the treasurer of the
fund for the relief of disabled firemen. In the city
of Altoona, the latter moiety is to be distributed
by the mayor among the several fire companies,
in equal shares.
4 1 Pitts. 68. But see 60 Barb. 152.
5 3 Law Times (N. 8.) 193.
6 14 Phila. 376.
1 42 Leg. Int. 171.
8 Act 23 March 1865. Purd. 104.
[ 868 ]
Threatening Letters.
I. Provisions of the Penal Code. II. Offence at common law.
I. Act 31 Maron 1860. Purd. 540.
Sror. 23. If any person shall knowingly send or deliver or utter to any other
person, any letter or writing, accusing or threatening to accuse either the person to
whom such letter or writing shall be sent or delivered, or any other person, of any
crime or misdemeanor [punishable by Jaw with imprisonment at labor], with a view
or intent to extort or gain, by means of such threatening letter or writing, any
property, money, security or other valuable thing, from any person whatsoever; or
shall send, deliver or utter any letter or writing threatening to kill or murder any
other person, or to burn or destroy any coal-breaker, house, barn or other building,
or any rick or stack of grain, hay’or straw or other agricultural produce; every such
offender shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and, on conviction, be sentenced to an
imprisonment by separate or solitary confinement, at labor, or by simple imprison-
ment, not exceeding three years, and to pay a fine not exceeding one thousand
dollars.
Act 8 May 1876. Purd. 540.
If any person shall knowingly send or deliver or utter to any other person any
letter or writing accusing, or ‘threatening to accuse, either the person to whom
such letter or writing shall be sent or delivered, or any other person, of any crime or
misdemeanor, with a view or intent to extort or gain, by means of such threatening
letter or writing, any property, moneys, security or other valuable thing, from any
person whatever, every such offender shall be guilty of a misdemeanor; and on
conviction, be sentenced to an imprisonment, by separate or solitary confinement at
labor, or by simple imprisonment, not exceeding three years, and to pay a fine not
exceeding one thousand dollars. And so much of the 23d section of the act of the
31st of March 1860, as requires that the crime or misdemeanor of which any person
is accused or threatened to be accused, in such threatening letter or writing, to be
a crime or misdemeanor, punishable with imprisonment at labor, be and the same
is hereby repealed.
II. The extortion of money by actual duress, or by threats of such a nature as
are calculated to overcome a man of ordinary firmness, is an indictable offence at
common law; but what are such threats as a man of ordinary firmness ought to
resist, is generally an embarrassing question, on the trial of a common-law indict-
ment for such offence. This section is a consolidation of the English statutes upon
the subject, and obviates the difficulties which beset common-law proceedings in
such cases. The decisions on the English statutes will be found in Hast’s P Q.
ch. 23.
1See act of 8 May 1876, infra.
[ 869 ]
Timber,
I. Provisions of the Penal Code. II. Civil remedies,
I. Aot 31 Marca 1860. Purd. 2005.
Sor, 152. If any person shall cut down or fell any timber tree or trees, knowing
the same to be growing or standing upon the lands of another person, without the
consent of the owner; or if any person shall purchase or receive any timber tree or
trees, knowing the same to have been cut or removed from the lands of another,
without the consent of the owner thereof; or who shall purchase or receive any
planks, boards, staves, shingles or other lumber made from such timber tree or
trees, so as aforesaid cut or removed, knowing the same to have been so made ; the
person so offending shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and, being thereof convicted,
shall be sentenced to pay such fine, not exceeding one thousand dollars, or to such
imprisonment, not exceeding one year, as the court, in their discretion, may think
proper to impose.
Timber trees are such as are used, not only for building purposes, but in the
mechanical arts.’
The act of assembly extends as well to unseated as to seated lands ; both are alike
within its protection”
In a prosecution for cutting timber trees, the title of the prosecutor to the land
on which the timber was cut, is not in question, it is enough, that he is in possession
under a claim of title. A tenant under a lease for of years may be described as
the owner.‘
Before a party can be made to suffer criminally, under this section, it must be
shown that the act was done knowing the timber to be growing on the land of
another; knowledge is an ingredient of the offence.® But it is unnecessary to
prove that the defendant knew who was the owner. The act of 1833, which does
not appear to be repealed or supplied, in this respect, by the revised Penal Code,
expressly provides that it shall be sufficient to convict the offender, “ that he knew
the lands on which the said tree or trees were growing did not belong to him or to
any person. by whom he was authorized.”
Il. Act 29 Marca 1824. Purd. 2006,
Sgcr. 3. Inall cases where any person, * * * shall cut down or fell, or employ any
person or persons to cut down or fell any timber tree or trees, growing upon the
lands of another, without the consent of the owner thereof, he, she or they so
offending, shall be liable to pay to such owner double the value of such tree or
trees so cut down or felled; or in case of the conversion thereof to the use of such
offender or offenders, treble the value thereof, to be recovered, with costs of suit, by
action of trespass or trover, as the case may be; and no prosecution by indictment
shall be any bar to such action.
és Act 8 Aprin 1833. Purd. 2006,
Sror. 10. In all cases in which suits shall be brought before a justice of the
peace, to recover damages for the cutting of timber trees, * * * and the defendant
shall offer to make oath or affirmation * * * that the title to the land will come in
question, the justice shall not receive the same until the defendant shall enter into
recognisance before him, with one or more sureties, in such sum as the justice may
direct, to pay to the plaintiff, such sum as shall be recovered against him in the said
suit, when removed as hereifafter directed, together with costs ; and on the
1 Lewis’ Cr. L 506. See 7 Johns. 233. 5 33 Penn. St. 499. 76 Ibid. 59.
2 12 Penn. St. 195. 6 Lewis’ Cr. L. 505.
8 1 Bro. app’x 25. 7 Purd. 2005 n,
4 Lewis’'Cr. L. 505.
870 TIMBER.
said oath or affirmation being made, instead of dismissing the said suit, the justice
shall transmit a copy of the record thereof, and of all the proceedings therein, to
the prothonotary of the court of common pleas of his county, who shall ‘enter the
same on his docket, and the said suit shall then be proceeded in, in the said court,
as if originally rightly brought there.
Aor 1 Apri 1840. Purd. 2006.
Sect, 1 All and singular the penalties and provisions of the act of March, 18249
are hereby made applicable to any person or persons who shall purchase or receive
any timber tree or trees, knowing the same to have been cut or removed from the
lands of another person without the consent of the owner or owners thereof; or who
shall purchase or receive any planks, boards, staves, shingles or other lumber made
from such timber tree or trees, so as aforesaid cut or removed, knowing the same to
have been so made; and in all cases of suits brought before a justice of the peace
under the 3d section of the said act, * * * against any person or persons, for pur-
chasing or receiving such timber tree or trees, or lumber made therefrom, and the
defendant shall offer to make oath or affirmation, * * * that the title of land
will come in question, the same course of proceeding shall be had, as is provided in
and by the 10th section of the act of 1833.
The action of trespass to recover treble damages, given by the act of 1824, for
cutting timber trees, can be maintained only by the owner of the land?
The party injured may sue either in trespass or trover; if he bring trover he
waives the trespass to his land, and is entitled to recover treble the value of the
trees cut and taken away.”
‘fo enable the party injured to recover treble damages, under the 3d section of
the act of 1824, itis only necessary to prove that the timber was cut without the
consent of the owner; knowledge on the part of the defendant, that the timber was
growing upon ‘the lands of another, is only requisite in a criminal prosecution.’
But under the act of 1840, purchaser of timber cut by a trespasser is not
liable for treble damages, unless he had knowledge of the trespass committed in
obtaining it.‘
A recovery of treble damages in an action of trespass for entering the plaintiff’s
land and cutting his timber, cannot be sustained, unless the record show that the
action was brought under the statute.®
To oust the jurisdiction of the justice, under the act of 1833, there must be a
positive affidavit that the title to the land will come in question ; it is not enough,
to swear to the best of the deponent’s knowledge and belief.® Unless such
affidavit be made, the justice’s jurisdiction is not ousted, although it subsequently
appear that the title to the land will come in question; it is too late to make
the objection, after the case comes into the common pleas by appeal.
11 Wz. 221. 4 36 Penn. St. 320.
2 16 Penn. St. 254. 5 Carpenter v. Koons, Com. Pleas, Phila, 29
3 33 Ibid. 489. 76 Ibid. 59. Interest cannot Repione 1849. MS.
be added to the treble damages. 43 Leg. Int. 19. 20 Penn. St. 464.
[ 871 ]
Time.
I. Acts of assembly. If. Judicial expositions as to the mode of computing time.
I. Acr 20 June 1883. Purd. 2007.
Sxcr. 1. Where by any existing law cr rule of court, or by any law or rule of court
that may hereafter be enacted, and made the performance of doing of any act, duty,
matter, payment or thing, shall be ordered and directed, and where any court shall,
by special or other order, direct the performance or doing of any act, matter, pay-
ment, sentence or decree, and the period of time or duration for the performance or
doing thereof shall be prescribed and fixed, such time in all cases shall be so com-
puted as to exclude the first. and include the last days of any such prescribed or fixed
period, or duration of time: Provided, That whenever the last day of any such period
shall fall on Sunday, or on any day made a legal holiday by the laws of this common-
wealth, or of the United States, such day shall be omitted from the computation:
And provided, That this act shall not apply to the payment of negotiable paper.
Srcr. 2. The provisions of this act shall also apply to the ordinances, resolutions,
by-laws and other regulations of all municipal or other public or private corporations
now existing or hereafter created.
Act 13 Aprin 1887. Purd. 2007.
Sect. 1. On and after the first day of July, Anno Domini one thousand eight hun-
dred and eighty-seven, the mean solar time of the seventy-fifth meridian of longitude
west of Greenwich, commonly called eastern standard time. shall be the sole and uni-
form legal standard of time throughout this commonwealth ; and, on and after the
date aforesaid, all days shall be everywhere taken to begin and end in accordance with
said standard: and every mention of or reference to any hour or time in any or all
existing future acts of assembly, municipal ordinances, and corporate by-laws, in any
and all existing or future rules or regulations adopted by any public officer, or official
board, in any and all rules of the courts of the commonwealth or any of them,
whether standing or special, and whether now in force or hereafter to be promulgated,
in any and all of said orders, judgments and decrees of said courts or any of them,
and judgments and sentences of magistrates pronounced or entered on after the date
aforesaid, in any and all contracts, deeds, wills and notices, and in the transaction of
all matters of business, public, legal, commercial or otherwise, shall be construed with
reference te and in accordance with the said standard hereby adopted, unless a differ-
ent standard is therein expressly provided for: Provided, however, That this act shall
not operate to impose upon any person any forfeiture of rights, or subject him to the
consequences of any default, by reason of any failure occurring prior to the date afore-
said to comply with the requirement of or do any act under or in pursuance of any
law, ordinance, contract, notice, deed, will, regulation, rule, order, judgment, sentence
or decree, if such person shall, before the said date, have properly done the act or
acts, which would be requisite to save such forfeiture, or prevent such default, had
this law not been enacted.
Sect. 2. Whenever, at any time between the passage of this act and the first day
of July, one thousand eight hundred and eighty-seven, any contract, deed, will,
872 TIME.
notice, order, judgment, sentence or decree shall mention or refer to any time prior to
the date aforesaid, or fix any period for the doing of any act expiring prior to
said date, the construction thereof shall be unaffected by the provisions of this act;
but as to any mention of or reference to any time subsequent to the last day of J une,
one thousand eight hundred and eighty-seven, or the fixing of any period expiring
subsequent to the date last aforesaid, the construction of the same shall be subject to
the provisions of the first section of this act.
II. In all contracts or transactions between man and man, months are to be consid-
ered calendar, and not lunar months. Thus, a note payable “two months after
date,”’ is not due at the expiration of two lunar months.! So the word “month ”’ in
an act of assembly has uniformly been construed to mean a calendar month.? Months
are calculated either as lunar, consisting of twenty-eight days, thirteen of which
make a year, or as calendar months, of unequal lengths, whereof in a year there are
only twelve.®
A person is of full age the day before the twenty-first anniversary of his birth-
day.*
Whenever, by a rule of court, or an act of the legislature, a given number of days
are allowed to do an act, or itis said an act may be done within a given number of
days, the day on which the rule is taken, or the decision made, is excluded ; and if one
or more Sundays occur within the time, they are counted, unless the last day falls on
a Sunday, in which case the act may be done on the next day.
The three days’ grace allowed in this country on bills of exchange and promissory
notes are reckoned exclusive of the day on which the bill or note falls due, and inclu-
sive of the last day of grace.®
The five years from the day of entry of a judgment, within which it must be revived
by scire facias, are exclusive of the day on which the judgment was entered.’ There
is no priority of lien between judgments entered on the same day ;° or between a
mortgage entered on the same day;° for the law does not recognise fractions of a
day, unless to prevent great mischief or inconvenience.” But this principle does not
apply, where there has been an absolute conveyance; in such case, to affect lands in
the hands of a purchaser, the judgment must have been, not merely simultaneous
with, but anterior to the conveyance ; and the actual priority may be shown by parol ;”
so, it may be shown that the defendant died before the entry of the judgment.”
Mortgages entered for record on the same day, have priority according to the time
they were actually left at the office for record.®
Every bill takes effect as a law from the time when it is approved by the governor
or president, and then its effect is prospective and not retrospective. The doctrine
that, in law, there is no fraction of a day, is a mere legal fiction, and has no applica-
tion to such a case."
The statute of 21 Hen. III., provides that, in leap-year, the 29th February and the
preceding day shall be holden but for one day.» But this has no relation to the com-
putation of time, when a rule or a statute fixes a certain number of days.!*
When a rule to set aside proceedings for irregularity, and to stay proceedings in the
mean time, is obtained, the proceedings are suspended for all purposes, till the rule is.
168. & R. 539. 15 Johns. 119, 922 Penn. St. 359. 24 Ibid. 363. 25 Ibid.
22 Dall. 302. 4 Ibid. 144. 35. & R. 184, 319. 2 Gr. 130.
82 Bl. Com. 142. 14 W.N. C. 566. 10 2 Bro. 19.
#1 Bl. Com. 462. 1 Kulp 157. 18 W. & S. 307-8. 2 Gr. 130,
53 P.& W. 200. 4 Penn. St. 516. 29 Ibid. 12 38 Penn. St. 480.
524-5. 40 Ibid. 372. 60 Ibid. 452. 14 W.N. 18 Purd. 588.
C. 566. 142 Story 571. 1 Cal. 490. But in 20 Vt.
6 Byles on Bills 161. 653, 21 Ibid. 619, this is denied to be law.
76 W.& 8. 377. 16 Rob. Dig. 207.
83P. & W. 245. 51 Penn. St. 432. 16 4 Penn. St. 517.
TRADE-MARKS. 873
disposed of. And therefore, the time for putting in bail remains the same after the
rule is discharged, as it was when it was granted.)
A contract to complete a work by a certain time, means that it shall be done before
that time.”
The act of 1883 has no retroactive operation.
Crade-Marks.
I. Provisions of che Penal Code. III. Criminal responsibility.
II. Civil remedies. IV. Judicial decisions.
I. Act 31 Marca 1860. Purd. 2016.
Sect. 173. If any person shall knowingly and wilfully forge or counterfeit, or cause
or procure to be forged or counterfeited, any representation, likeness, similitude, copy
or imitation of the private stamps, wrappers or labels, usually fixed by any mechanic or
manufacturer to, and used by such mechanic or manufacturer on or in the sale of any
goods, warcs or merchandise, with intent to deceive or defraud the purchaser or
manufacturer of any goods, wares or merchandise whatsoever, such person shall be
guilty of a misdemeanor, and, on conviction thereof, be sentenced to pay a fine not
exceeding one hundred dollars, and undergo an imprisonment not exceeding two
years.
Srcr. 174. If any person shall have in his possession any die, plate, engraving or
printed label, stamp or wrapper, or any representation, likeness, similitude, copy or
imitation of the private stamp, wrapper or label usually affixed by any mechanic or
manufacturer to and used by such manufacturer or mechanic on or in the sale of any
goods, wares or merchandise, with intent to use or sell the said die, plate, engraving
or printed stamp, label or wrapper, for the purpose of aiding or assisting, in any way
. \ whatever, in vending any goods; wares or merchandise, in imitation of or intended
to resemble and to be sold for the goods, wares or merchandise of such mechanic or
manufacturer, such person shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and, upon being thereof
convicted, be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding one hundred dollars, and to un-
dergo an imprisonment not exceeding one year.
Szor. 175. If any person shall vend any goods, wares or merchandise, having
thereon any forged or counterfeit stamps or labels of any mechanic or manufacturer,
knowing the same to be forged or counterfeited, and resembling or purporting to be
imitations of the stamps or labels of such mechanic or manufacturer, without dis-
closing the fact to the purchaser thereof, such person shall, upon conviction, be
deemed guilty of « misdemeanor, and be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding five
hundred dollars.
II. Act 20 Aprit 1853. Purd. 258.
Secr. 1. All manufacturers and vendors of mineral waters and other beverages
in bottles, upon which their mark or marks shall be respectively impressed, may
file in the office of the secretary of the commonwealth* a description of such bot-
147. R. 176. 4The act 8 May 1889, Purd. 258, makes the
23 P. & W. 48. certificate of the secretary, under his official
3104 Penn. St. 500. See 148 P.S. 353. 11 seal, conclusive evidence of the publication,
C. C. 282. marking and registration.
874 TRADE-MARKS.
tles, and of the name or marks thereon, and shall cause the same to be published for
six weeks, successively, in a daily, weekly or other newspaper published in the
county wherein the same shall be manufactured or sold, except in the city and county
of Philadelphia, where the said publication shall be made for the same time in two
daily newspapers.
Srcr. 2. It is hereby declared to be unlawful for any person or persons here-
after, without the permission of the owner thereof, to fill with mineral waters or
other beverages any such bottles so marked, or to sell, dispose of, or to buy, or to
traffic in any such bottles so marked and not bought by him or her of such owner
thereof, and every person so offending shall be liable to a penalty of fifty cents for
every bottle so filled, or sold, or used, or disposed of, or bought, or trafficked in,
for the first offence, and of five dollars for every subsequent offence, to be recovered
before any alderman or justice of the peace, as fines and penalties are by law reco-
verable, for the use of the commonwealth.” .
Sect. 3. The fact of any person, other than the rightful owner thereof, using
any such bottles for the sale therein of any beverage, shall be prima facie proof
of the unlawful use or purchase of such bottles as aforesaid, and any such owner,
or agent of the owner, who shall make oath or affirmation before any alderman or
justice of the peace, that he has reason to believe, and does believe, that any of his
bottles stamped and registered as aforesaid, are being unlawfully used, or are con-
cealed by any person or persons selling or manufacturing mineral waters or other
beverages, that the said alderman or justice of the peace shall, thereupon, issue a
process in the nature of a search-warrant, directed to any constable, commanding
him to search the premises, wagons, carts or other places of the offender or offend-
ers, where said bottles are alleged to be, and if upon such search, any bottles so marked
shall be found, to bring the same, together with the body of the person in whose
possession they may be found, before said alderman or justice of the peace, there to
be dealt with according to law.
III. Aor 4 Aprin 1865. Purd. 259.
Sect. 1, Any person or persons engaged in the manufacture of malt liquor for
sale, in butts, hogsheads, barrels, half-barrels, casks, half-casks, quarter-casks or
kegs, with his, her or their name or names or other private marks, respectively,
branded or stamped thereon, may file in the office of the prothonotary of the county
in which such articles shall be manufactured a description of the names used, and
other private mark or marks to be branded or stamped thereon, and shall cause the
same to be published once a week for six weeks successively, in a newspaper pub-
lished in such county, and in the city of Philadelphia, where such publications
shall be made for the same time, in two daily newspapers published in said city.
Sxcr. 2. It is hereby declared to be unlawful for any person or persons, hereafter,
other than the lawful owner or owners, as mentioned and referred to in the first
section of this act, to fill with malt liquor or liquors for any purpose whatever,
or to use, traffic in, purchase, sell, dispose of, detain, convert, mutilate or destroy, or
wilfully or unreasonably refuse to return or deliver to such owner, upon demand
being made, any such butt, hogshead, barrel, half-barrel, cask, half-cask, quarter-
cask or keg, so branded or stamped, or from which such brand or stamps have been
removed, cut off, defaced or obliterated, or to remove, cut off, deface or obliterate,
or to brand or stamp other brands or stamps on the same, without the written per-
mission of such original or lawful owner or owners thereof, or unless there shall
have been a sale in express terms of any such article, exclusive of the malt liquor
contained therein, to such person or persons, by said original or lawful owner or
owners ; any person so offending shall, upon conviction, be deemed guilty of a mis-
demeanor, to be punished for the first offence by a fine of ten dollars for each and
every such butt, hogshead, barrel, half-barrel, cask, half-cask, quarter-cask or keg,
so filled and trafficked in, purchased, sold, disposed of, detained, converted, muti-
lated or destroyed, or not so delivered or returned; and by a fine of twenty dollars,
and by imprisonment in a county jail, for not less than one and not more than three
months for each and every subsequent offence, to be recovered in the same manner
1 See 6 Phila. 321.
TRADE-MARKS, 875
as fines are now recoverable, one-half for the: use of the poor of the city or the
county where such offence shall be committed, and one-half for the use of the officer
who may arrest such offender.
Sgor. 3. Any such owner or owners, or the agent of such owner or owners, who
shall make oath or affirmation before any justice of the peace, alderman or an.
magistrate having jurisdiction in criminal matters, that he has reason to dalled,
setting forth the facts upon which such belief is founded, and does believe, that any
of the above-named articles, belonging to him or them, so branded or stamped a
aforesaid, or from which the brands or stamps have been cut off, removed, defaced
or obliterated, or which have been mutilated or wilfully detained, after demand has
been made by any person or persons manufacturing or selling malt liquors, or any
other liquor or liquid, or that any junk or cask dealer, or any other pergon or per-
sons whomsoever, shall have any of the articles above described, unlawfully as afore-
said, in his, her or their possession, or secreted on his, her or their premises, or in
any other place under his, her or their control, the said magistrate shall thereupon
on proof of such demand having been made, issue a search-warrant, directed to any
constable or other proper officer, to search the premises of the offender or offenders
or said place where any such articles are alleged to be, particularly describing such
premises or place ; and if upon search any such articles shall be found, to take pos-
session of the same, and to bring the body of the person, in whose possession or
control any such article may be found, before such magistrate, to be tried as for a
misdemeanor under the same regulations now provided by law for the trial of mis-
demeanor, and to be punished in the manner set forth in the second section of this act.
Acr 8 May 1889. Purd. 258.
Sect. 1. The manufacturers or vendors of beverages, or other articles of merchandise
ir bottles, upon which bottles said manufacturers’ or vendors’ names or other marks
shall be respectively impressed, may cause a description of said bottles and of the
names or marks impressed thereon, tc be published once a week, for six weeks suc-
cessively, in a newspaper of the county where the same shall be manufactured or sold,
and upon producing proof of said publication, may file said description in the office of
the secretary of the commonwealth, where the same shall then be registered.
Sxcr. 2. The certificate of the secretary of the commonwealth or his authorized
deputy, under the seal of his department, shall, in all cases, be conclusive evidence of
the publication, marking and registering of such bottles. ,
Act 8 May 1889. Purd. 258.
Secr. 1. It shall be unlawful for any person or persons, without the written permis-
sion of the owner or owners thereof, to refill with any beverage or other article of
merchandise for the purpose of sale, or to buy, or sell, or deal, or traffic in any bottle
or bottles having impressed upon it, or them, the manufacturer’s or vendor’s name, or
names, or other marks which shall have been registered according to law.
Secr. 2. It is hereby declared to be a misdemeanor to refill said bottles with any
beverage or other article of merchandise for the purpose of sale, or to buy, or sell, or
deal, or traffic in said bottles so registered, without the permission in writing of the
owner or owners thereof, and upon conviction thereof the offender shall be sentenced
te pay a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars or to suffer an imprisonment for a
term not exceeding six months, or both, at the discretion of th2 court.
The fact of any person, other than the rightful owner thereof, refilling any such
bottles or using the same for the sale therein of any beverage or other article of mer-
‘chandise,or having in his or her possession said bottles for the purpose of dealing or
trafficking therein, shall be prima facie proof of the unlawful use, or purchase of, or
for the unlawful dealing or trafficking in, such bottles as aforesaid.
IV. An action on the case may be maintained by » manufacturer who marks his
goods with the known and accustomed mark of the plaintiff—where the mark used by
the defendant resembles the plaintiffs mark so closely as to be calculated to deceive,
and as to induce persons to believe the defendant’s goods to be of the plaintiff's manu-
facture, and the defendant uses such mark with intent to deceive—and sells the goods
876 TRADE-MARKS.
so marked as and for goods of the plaintiff’s manufacture; and proof of special
damage is not necessary.
Where the plaintiff had invented a certain medicine, and the defendant had pre-
pared an inferior article, which he sold as and for the medicine of the plaintiff, it was
held to be a fraud, for which the plaintiff might maintain an action, without proof of
special damage.”
No person has the right to use the name, marks, letters or other symbols which
another has previously got up, or been accustomed to use in his trade, business or
manufactures.*
Where a manufacturer adopts a certain trade-mark, and stamps it upon the article
manufactured, he is entitled to the exclusive use of it, and a court of equity will re-
strain by injunction, any other person who pirates such trade-mark from using the
same. And where the person pirates a trade-mark for the fraudulent purpose of
passing off his own article for that of him whose mark he has taken, and to supplant
him in the good-will of the business, he will be liable also to respond in damages for
the injury thus caused.*
It is no defence to such a suit, that the simulated article is equal in quality to the
genuine ;> nor that the maker of the spurious goods, or the jobber who sells them to
the retailers, informs those who purchase that the article is spurious, or an imitation.”
A foreigner is entitled to the protection of his trade-mark as well as a citizen.” On
a dissolution of partnership, both the former partners are entitled to use the trade-
mark of the firm.® s
On a bill to restrain one from the use of trade-marks, the question is not whether
the complainant was the original inventor of the mark alleged to have been pirated,
nor whether the article sold under the pirated mark is of equal value with the gentine;
but the ground is, that the complainant has an interest in the good-will of his trade
or business, and having taken a particular label or sign, indicating that the article sold
under it was made by him, and sold under his authority, or that he carries on business
at a particular place, he is entitled to protection against one who attempts to pirate
upon the good-will of his friends or customers, by using such label or sign, without his
consent or authority.®
An alien manufacturer may maintain a bill for such injuncticn, or an action at law
against a citizen of the United States using his trade-mark.”
Dodderidge, in Southern and Howe’s case," cited a case to be adjudged in 33 Eliz.
(B. C.). A clothier of Gloucestershire sold very good cloth, so that in London if they
saw any cloth of his mark, they would buy it without searching ; and another who
made bad cloth, put his mark upon it without his privity. Action on the case was
brought upon this deceit, and adjudged it well lies.”
A court of equity will not, in a contest between persons who profess to be manu-
facturers of quack medicines, interfere to protect the use of trade-marks, by injune-
tion. A complainant whose business is imposition, cannot invoke the aid of equity
against a piracy of his trade-marks."
15M.G. & Se. 109. 2 Am. L. Reg. 681. See 5 2 Sandf. Ch. 586, 622. 11 Paige 293. 2 W.
3 Penn. L. J. 143. 2 Brewst. 314. 7 Phila. 257. & M.1.
26 Leg. Int. 413. 43 Ibid. 151. 6 2 Sandf, Ch. 586.
219 Pick. 214. And see 3 Doug. 293. 3B. 74 McLean 516,
&C. 541. 5D. & R. 2938. 4B. & Ad. 410. 2 8 5 Ibid. 256.
M. & G. 385. 9 2 Sandf. Ch. 622.
8 2 Sandf. Ch. 586, 603. 1011 Paige 292. 2W.& M.1.
411 Paige 292. And see 2 Brewst. 303, 308, 1 Cro. Jac. 468.
314, 325, 12 Treatise on Frauds 185. Poph. 143-4.
34 Clark 145. 60 Penn. St. 156.
[ 877 J
Crades-WMnions.
Act 8 May 1869. Purd. 2017.
Sect. 1. It shall be lawful for any and all classes of mechanics, journeymen, trades-
men and laborers to form societies and associations for their mutual aid, benefit and
protection, and peaceably to meet, discuss and establish all necessary by-laws; rules
and regulations to carry out the same.!
Act 14 June 1872. Purd. 2017.
Sect. 1. It shall be lawful for any laborer or laborers, workingman or workingmen,
journeyman or journeymen, acting either as individuals or as the member of any club,
‘society or association, to refuse to work or labor for any person or persons, whenever,
in his, her or their opinion, the wages paid are insufficient, or the treatment of such
laborer or laborers, workingman or workingmen, journeyman or journeymen, by his,
her or their employer is brutal or offensive, or the continued labor by such laborer or
laborers, workingman or workingmen, journeyman or journeymen, would be contrary
to the rules, regulations or by-laws of any club, society or organization to which he,
she or they might belong, without subjecting any person or persons so refusing to work
or labor, to prosecution or indictment for conspiracy, under the criminal laws of this
commonwealth: Provided, That this act shall not be held to apply to the member or
members of any club, society or organization, the constitution, by-:aws, rules and regu-
lations of which, are not in strict conformity to the constitution of the state of Penn-
sylvania, and to the constitution of the United States: Provided, That nothing herein
contained shall prevent the prosecution and’ punishment, under existing laws, of any
person or persons who shall, in any way, hinder persons who desire to labor for their
employers from so doing, or other persons from being employed as laborers.
Act 20 Aprin 1876. Purd. 2017.
Sect. 1. The use of lawful or peaceful means, having for their object a lawful pur-
pose, shall not be regarded as ‘‘in any way hindering’’ persons who desire to labor;
and the use of force, threat or menace of harm to persons or property, shall alone be
‘regarded as in any way hindering persons who desire to labor for their employers from
so doing, or other persons from being employed as laborers.
Act 13 May 1889. Purd. 2017.
Secr. 1. From and after the passage of this act five or more employés, at least
three of whom shall be citizens of the United States, may, by their agreement and
upon a compliance with the provisions of this act, form themselves into an association
for their mutual aid and benefit and protection in their trade concerns.
Sect. 2. When such association is to include employés residing only in one county
of this commonwealth, a petition in the following form, or substantially so, may be
presented to the court of common pleas of such county :
To the honorable the court of common pleas of county :
The petition or the undersigned respectfully shows:
First. That they are employés and residents of the county of :
Second. That three of your petitioners are citizens of the United States. .
Third. That they have agreed to form themselves into an association for their mutual
aid, benefit and protection, in their trade concerns.
Fourth. That the name of the association is to be — 3 wee :
Fifth. That said association is to include only employés who are residents of said county.
Sixth The chief office of said association is to be located at ——., said county.
Your petitioners therefore pray your honorable court to grant them a charter for such
association.
And they will ever pray.
|
in
ww we
~'
Signatures of petitioners.
1 This act does not extend to the counties of Centre and Clearfield.
878 TRADES-UNIONS.
State of Pennsylvania, \
County of ——, en
Before me, , in and for said county, personally appeared ’
the foregoing petitioners, who being duly , depose and say that the facts set forth
in the foregoing petition are true.
and subscribed to, this——
— Anno Domini —.
day of
|]
I
“wwe
Signaturss of affiants.
Sect. 3. When such association is to include employés residing in more than one
county of this commonwealth, an application for a charter for the same may be made
to the governor in the same, or substantially the same, form as to a court, excepting a
change in the address thereof and an averment that the association is to include em-
ployés residing in more than one county of this commonwealth.
Srcr. 4. Upon the presentation of a petition or application as aforesaid, it shall be
the duty of the court or of the governor, to mark the same “‘Granted’’ and file the
same of record in the proper office, and on request a certified copy thereof, on the
payment of a reasonable fee therefor, shall be given to the petitioners.
Szcr. 5. An association authorized by this act, by virtue of its charter, shall have
the following powers :
First. To have succession by its associated name for the period limited by its char-
ter, and when no period is limited thereby or by this act, perpetually, subject to the
power of the general assembly under the constitution of this commonwealth.
Second. To maintain and defend judicial proceedings.
Third. To make and use a common seal and alter the same at pleasure.
Fourth. To purchase, hold and transfer such real estate and personal property as
the purposes of the corporation may require.
Fifth. To elect or appoint and compensate such officers or agents as the business of
such association may require.
Sixth. To establish a constitution and adopt by-laws and rules, not inconsistent
with law, for the management of its property and the conduct and regulation of its
affairs.
Seventh. To enter into any obligation necessary to the transaction of its business.
Etghth. To organize and establish, for the purposes mentioned in section one of
this act, such subordinate associations of employés as shall apply therefor, under such
reasonable rules, regulations and restrictions, as may by the parent association be
deemed necessary.
Sect. 6. Any officer, agent or member of such association, or of any such subordi-
nate association, who shall fraudulently take, keep or convert to his own use, or to
the use of another, any money or other thing of value, given to, collected for, or due,
or belonging to such association, or which is to be sent, paid or delivered by such
officer, agent or member, to any person, firm or corporation, on behalf of such asso-
ciation, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and on conviction thereof shall be
sentenced to restore the property, unless already restored, and to be imprisoned in the
county jail or work-house for any period not exceeding one year, or to pay a fine of
not more than five hundred dollars, or both or either, at the discretion of the court.
Secr. 7. Any officer, agent or member of such association, or of any such subordi-
nate association, who shall wilfully keep, secrete, mutilate or destroy, or refuse to
turn over to his successor, duly elected or appointed, or to the proper authority as
provided by the constitution and by-laws thereof, any seal, minute-book, record,
ledger, voucher or other book or books, paper or papers, or any article of personal
property belonging or pertaining to the affairs of such association, shall be deemed
guilty of a misdemeanor, and on conviction thereof shall be sentenced to restore to the
proper authority such article or articles and to undergo an imprisonment for a period
not exceeding six months, or to be fined in any sum not exceeding three hundred
dollars, or both or either, at the discretion of the court.
TRAMPS. 879
Act 16 June 1891. Purd. 2019.
Szcr. 1. It shall be lawful for employés, acting either as individuals or collectively,
or as the members of any club, assembly, association or organization, to refuse to
work or labor for any person, persons, corporation or corporations, whenever in his,
her or their opinion the wages paid are insufficient, or his, her or their treatment is
offensive or unjust, or whatever the continued labor or work by him, her or them
would be contrary to the constitution, rules, regulations, by-laws, resolution or reso-
lutions of any club, assembly, association, organization or meeting of which he, she
or they may be a member or may have attended, and as such individuals or members
or as having attended any meeting it shall be lawful for him, her or them to devise
and adopt ways and means to make such rules, regulations, by-laws, resolution or
resolutions effective, without subjecting them to indictment for conspiracy at common
law or under the criminal laws of this commonwealth: Provided, First. That this act
shall not be held to apply to the member or members of any club, assembly, associa-
tion, organization or meeting, the constitution, rules, regulations, by-laws, resolution
or resolutions of which are not in conformity with the constitution of the United
States and to the constitution of this commonwealth: Provided, Second. That
nothing herein contained shall prevent the prosecution and punishment, under any
law, other than that of conspiracy, of any person or persons who shall, by the use of
force, threats or menace or harm to person or property, hinder or attempt to hinder
any person or persons who may desire to labor or work for any employer from so
doing for such wages and upon such terms and conditions as he, she or they may
deem proper: And provided, Third, That nothing herein contained shall prevent the
prosecution and punishment of any persons conspiring to commit a felony,
A striker who interferes with his employer by insulting language and threats, will
be bound over in substantial security to keep the peace. A striker who meets a non-
union workman on the street, and calls him a ‘‘damn scab,’’ will be summarily con-
victed and punished for disorderly conduct.” It is a levying of war against a state,
and treason, for a large number of men armed and organized to engage in the common
purpose to defy the law, to resist its officers and to deprive any portion of their fellow-
citizens of their legal rights.2 Where employers combine to resist an advance in
wages by refusing to sell to any parties who have conceded such advance, they cannot
be held liable in damages for refusing to sell to such parties, or advising others not to
sell to such parties.*
Cramps.
Act 30 Apri 1879. Purd. 541.
Szcr. 1. Any person going about from place to place begging, asking or subsisting
upon charity, and for the purpose of acquiring money for a living, and who shall have
no fixed place of residence or lawful occupation in the county or city in which he shall
be arrested, shall be taken and deemed to be a tramp, and guilty of a misdemeanor,’
and on conviction shall be sentenced to undergo an imprisonment by separate and
solitary confinement at labor, in the county jail or work-house, for not more than
twelve months, in the discretion of the court: Provided, That if any person so arrested
can prove, by satisfactory evidence, that he does not make a practice of going about
begging or subsisting upon alms, for the purpose aforesaid, in the manner above set
forth, he shall not be deemed guilty of the offence hereinbefore described, and upon
such proof, shall be discharged from arrest, either by the magistrate before whom he
is committed, or by the court, upon hearing of the case upon writ of habeas corpus.
Sect. 2. Any tramp who shall enter any dwelling-house, against the will or without
the permission of the owner or occupant thereof, or shall kindle any fire in the high-
way, or on the Jand of another, without the owner’s consent, or shall be found carrying
any fire-arms or other dangerous weapon, with intent unlawfully to do injury ov in-
timidate any other person, which intent may be inferred by the jury trying the case,
from the facts that the defendant is a tramp, and so armed, or shall do, or threaten to
do, any injury, not amounting toa felony, to any person, or to the real or personal
111. C. 481. 433 W.N.C. 421. Ibid. 427-8.
212 Ibid. 91. 5 See 18 Chicago L. News 84.
8 Ibid. 97.
880 TRANSCRIPT.
estate of another, shall, upon conviction, be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and shall
be sentenced to undergo an imprisonment by separate or solitary confinement, at labor,
for a period not exceeding three years. ;
Secor. 3. Any act of beggary or vagrancy, by any person described by the first section
of this act, shall be prima facie evidence that the person committing the same is a
tramp, within the meaning of this act, subject to the proviso contained in section one
of this act.:
Sect. 4. Any person, upon view of any offence described in this act, may apprehend
the offender and take him before a justice of the peace or alderman, whose duty it
shall be, after hearing the evidence, to discharge or to commit the prisoner for trial,
as in the case of other misdemeanors. .
Secr. 5. This act shall not apply to any female, or minor under the age of sixteen
years, nor to any blind, deaf or dumb person, nor shall it be applicable to any maimed
or crippled person who is unable to perform manual labor.
Cranscript.
‘What constitutes a transcript from a justice’s and of filling a transcript in the courts ef com~-
docket—of the effects of taking a transcript mon pleas. Copy of a transcript.
from the docket of one justice to another justice,
A TRANSCRIPT is the copy of an original writing or deed where it is written over or
exemplified A copy of the proceedings before a justice of peace, as they are re-
corded on his docket, is called a transcript.
It shall be the duty of the justice, on demand made either by plaintiff or defendant,
to make out a copy of his proceedings at large, and deliver the said copy duly certified
by him, to the party requiring the same, and if, on such demand, he shall refuse so to
do, it shall be deemed a misdemeanor in office.”
The prothonotaries of the respective counties shall enter on their dockets tran-
scripts of judgments obtained before justices of the peace of their proper counties,
without the agency of an attorney [for the fee of fifty cents], which transcripts the
justices shall deliver to any person who may apply for the same, and which judgments,
from the time of such entries on the prothonotary’s docket, shall bind the real estate
of the defendants; but no fiert facias shall be issued by any prothonotary, until a cer-
tificate shall be first produced to him from the justice before whom the original judg-
ment was entered, stating therein, that an execution had issued to the proper constable,
as directed by this act, and a return thereon that no goods could be found sufficient to
satisfy said demand ; and any justice issuing an execution on a judgment removed as
aforesaid, shall, on the plaintiff producing a receipt for the delivery of such transcript
to the prothonotary of the county, to be entered of record, tax [fifty cents] upon such
execution for the prothonotary’s fees as aforesaid ; and no judgment, whether obtained
before a justice, or in any court of record within this commonwealth, shall deprive any
person of his or her right asa freeholder longer or for any greater time than such
diem shall remain unsatisfied, any law, usage or custom to the contrary notwith-
standing.
Where a judgment has been obtained before a justice of the peace of this common-
wealth, to the amount of one hundred dollars and upwards, it shall and may be lawful
for the plaintiff in such judgment, upon filing a transcript thereof in the court of com-
mon pleas of the county in which the judgment was obtained, to have execution thereof
in said court, without first having an execution issued by the justice and a return of
nulla bona by a constable: Provided, however, That nothing herein contained shall be
construed to affect the right of the defendant in such judgment to supersede the same,
by the entry of bail, an appeal or certiorart, as provided by existing laws.‘
Transcripts of judgments of justices of the peace, filed in the common pleas, stand
on the same footing in all respects as judgments originally entered in court. A
transcript entered on the docket of the common pleas is, as regards real estate,
virtually a judgment of that court; consequently, it may be set aside, on motion,
with or without an issue, where it has been obtained surreptitiously, or it may be
« 1 Cowel. 4 Act 9 May 1889. Purd. 1144,
2 Act 20 March 1810 3 23. Purd. 1146. 61 Binn, 221. Act 24 June
3 Act 20 March 1810 210. Purd. 1143. 1143, i PEt See
TRANSORIPT. 881
only opened to let the party into a defence, where he has missed his time either
through accident or mistake."
A transcript of the judgment of a justice, filed in pursuance of the act, is in its
legal effect a judgment of the court of common pleas, and may be so styled in a
scire facias to revive the same. If a judgment be rendered by a justice, for a sum
beyond his jurisdiction, and a transcript of such judgment be filed in the common
pleas, it cannot be treated as a nullity, in a setre facias to revive such judgment ;
the remedy being by motion to have the judgment stricken off, or perhaps, by writ
of error?
Ip an action brought to recover the amount of a judgment rendered by a justice
of the peace in another county, a certified trauscript of such judgment is prima
facie evidence, under the act of 1810, although not sworn to be a true copy.’
Where it is alleged that the transcript returned to the common pleas does not
conform to the docket of the justice, which is alleged to be erroneous, and an
application is made for leave to amend the docket by the transcript, the court
below are to determine, upon inspection of the docket, and all the papers and evi-
dence before them, what are the true words of the record; and if the amendment be
refused, the supreme court will not, for that reason, reverse the judgment.
After an appeal has been entered, the justice cannot grant a transcript ¢o constt-
tute a lien, according to section ten of the act of 1810.6 A transcript of the judg-
ment of a justice of the peace, filed in the common pleas, creates no lien upon the
defendant’s real estate, if an appeal be entered before the justice, within the time
limited by law.®
A transcript of the judgment of a justice of the peace, filed in the court of com-
mon pleas, in pursuance of the act of 1810, is such a judgment of that court as an
attachment may issue upon under the provisions of the act of 1836."
TRANSCRIPT FROM THE DOCKET OF MAGISTRATE SMITH.
Criry or PHILADELPHIA
vs.
SamuE. Lescu.
Cota. ww «$3.87
‘Trans. ee ‘ 60
Warrant issued, September 5th, 1880; A. G. Fisher, Consta-
ble. Returned, September 9th, 1870, on oath :—‘‘I have here
the body of the defendant, as within | am commanded.”
Plaintiff charges the defendant, as driver of cab No. 79, with
having violated the LOth section of an ordinance intituled “an
ordinance for the regulation of the owners and drivers of
hackney-coaches, wagons, carts and drays within the city
of Philadelphia,’’ passed April 16th, 1812, by standing with said
cab in a street other than those which are appointed for them,
to wit, in Chestnut street, in the city of Philadelphia, opposite to
Jones's Hotel, on the 5th of September inst., between the hours
of 3 and 5 o'clock p. m., he not being then actually employed,
whereby he incurred a penalty of two dollars. A. G. Fisher,
sw. Piff. J. H. Presser, sw. Plif. Whereupon, judgment for
the plaintiff fur two dollars. Eo. die, execution issued, ret.
September 27th. September 12th, received a certiorari, and
same day made a return and stayed the execution.
September 10th, Tr. for the defendant.
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ss.
I certiry,
that the above is a correct transcript of the proceedings had before me, in
the above suit, and of record on my docket. ; 2
WITNESS my hand and seal, at Philadelphia, this thirteenth day fee in the
year of our Lord 1880.
: MITH,
Magistrate of Court No. 3.
[ 882 ]
reason,
I. Provisions of the Penal Code. II. Judicial decisions.
Aor 31 Marcu 1860. Purd. 541.
Suor. 1. If any person, owing allegiance to the commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
shall levy war against the same, or shall adhere to the enemies thereof, giving them
aid and comfort, within the state or elsewhere, and shall be thereof convicted, on
confession in open court, or on the testimony of two witnesses, to the same overt
act of the treason whereof he shall stand indicted, such person shall, on conviction,
be adjudged guilty of treason against the commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and be
sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding two thousand dollars, and undergo an
imprisonment, by separate and solitary confinement, at labor, not exceeding twelve
ears.
Sect. 2. If any person, having knowledge of any of the treasons aforesaid, shall
conceal, and not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known the same to the
governor or attorney-general of the state, or some one of the judges or justices
thereof, such person shall, on conviction, be adjudged guilty of misprision of trea-
son, and shall be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars, and:
undergo an imprisonment, by separate or solitary confinement, at labor, not exceed-
ing six years: Provided always, That nothing herein contained shall authorize the
conviction of any husband or wife for concealing any treasons committed by them
respectively.
Aor 18 Apri 1861. Purd. 542.
Scr. 1. If any person or persons belonging to, or residing within, this state,
and under the protection of its laws, shall take a commission or commissions from any
person, state or states, or other the enemies of this state, or of the United States
of America, or who shall levy war against this state or government thereof, or
knowingly and willingly shall aid or assist any enemies in open war against this
state or the United States, by joining their armies, or by enlisting, or procuring or
persuading others to enlist for that purpose, or by furnishing such enemies with
arms or ammunition, or any other articles for their aid and comfort, or by carrying
on a traitorous correspondence with them, or shall form, or be in anywise concerned
in forming any combination or plot or conspiracy, for betraying this state or the
United States of America into the hands or power of any foreign enemy, or any
organized or pretended government engaged in resisting the laws of the United
States, or shall give or send any intelligence to the enemies of this state or of the
United States of America, or shall, with intent to oppose, prevent or subvert
the government of this state or of the United States, endeavor to persuade any per-
son or persons from entering the service of this state or of the United States, or
from joining any volunteer company or association of this state about being mustered
‘into service, or shall use any threats or persuasions, or offer any bribe, or hold out
any hope of reward, with like intent to induce any person or persons to abandon
said service, or withdraw from any volunteer company or association already organ-
ized under the laws of this commonwealth, for that purpose; every person so
offending and being legally convicted thereof, shall be guilty of a high misde-
meanor, and shall be sentenced to undergo solitary imprisonment in the peniten-
tiary, at hard labor, for a term not exceeding ten years, and be fined in a sum not
exceeding five thousand dollars, or both, at the discretion of the court: Provided,
That this act shall not prohibit any citizen from taking or receiving civil commis-
sions for the acknowledgment of deeds and other instruments of writing.
Ssor. 2. If any person or persons within this commonwealth, shall sell, build,
furnish, construct, alter or fit out, or shall aid or assist in selling, building, con-
structing, altering or fitting out any vessel or vessels, for the purpose of making war
or privateering, or other purpose, to be used in the service of any person or parties
whatever, to make war on the United States of America, or to resist by force or
otherwise, the execution of the laws of the United States, such person or persons
TRESPASS AND TROVER. 883
shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and on conviction thereof, shall be sentenced to
undergo solitary imprisonment in the penitentiary, at hard labor, not exceeding ten
years, and be fined in a sum not exceeding ten thousand dollars, or both, at the
discretion of the court.
II. Treason is a breach of allegiance, and can be committed by him only who
owes allegiance, either perpetual or temporary.’
Where the premeditated object and intent of a riotous assembly is to prevent by
force and violence the execution of a law of the state, by force and violence to coerce
its repeal by legislative authority, or to deprive any class of the community of the
protection afforded by law, and the rioters proceed to execute by force, their pre-
meditated objects and intents, they are guilty of treason, in levying war against the
state.?
But a resistance to the execution of a law of the state, accompanied with any
degree of force, is not treason ; to constitute that offence, the object of the resistance
must be of a public and general character.2 And there must be an actual levying
of war; a conspiracy to subvert the government by force, is not treason; nor is
a mere enlistment of men, who are not assembled, a levying of war ;‘ so, no man
ean be convicted of treason who was not present when the war was levied.®
Delivering up prisoners and deserters to the enemy, is giving them aid and com-
fort, and therefore, treason ;° and so is the carrying of provisions towards the
enemy, with intent to supply him, though that intention should be defeated.”
The clause requiring the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act of
treason, refers to the proofs on the trial, and not to the preliminary hearing before -
the committing magistrate, or the proceeding before the grand jury.®
Crespass and Crober,
I. Jurisdiction of justices in trespass and trover. III. Judicial decisions relating to trespass.
II. Proceedings before referees. IV. Trover and conversion.
I. Act 22 Marcu 1814. Purd. 1148.
SxoT. 1. The justices of the peace of the several counties of this commonwealth,
and the aldermen (magistrates) of the city of Philadelphia, shall have jurisdiction
of actions of trover and conversion, and of actions of trespass brought for the recov-
ery of damages for injury done or committed on real and personal estate, in all cases
where the value of the property claimed, or the damages alleged to have been sus-
tained, shall not exceed one hundred dollars.
Sgor. 2. It shall be the duty of the justice or alderman before whom any suit or
action is brought, if the demand does not exceed ten dollars, to proceed to hear and
determine as to him of justice and right shall appear to belong ; but if the demand
in controversy should exceed that sum, then, on the request of either party, or his or
her agent, three reputable citizens shall be chosen by the parties or their agents,
as referees, or if they cannot agree, or if only one party, or his or her agent, should
appear, then the justice or alderman shall appoint the referees, who shall be sworn
or affirmed justly and truly to assess the damages alleged to have been sustained, or
the value of the property in dispute, which they or a majority of them shall have
power to assess: Provided, That if both parties or their agents shall not prefer a
reference, the justice or alderman shall proceed to hear and determine, and if the
1 5 Wheat. 97. @ 2719-36.
22 Wail, Jr. OC. C. 140, 202. Whart. St. Tr. 6 2 Wheeler Cr. Cas. 477.
634. 2 Dall. 346, 348. Whart. on Hom. 462. 73 W.C.C. 234. Whart. Cr. L. 3 2727. See
lace 4 A ay wan ne C. 138. 1 Burr’s Trial 196. 18
. Jr. O. C. 136, 140. m. all. Jr. CO. C. urr’s Tr 2
L. - oe ea : Leg. Int. 149, But see Fries’ Trial 14. Whart.
. J. 83.
8 2 Burr’s Trial 401, 430. See Whart. Cr. L. St. Tr. 480.
\
884 TRESPASS AND TROVER.
sum adjudged does not exceed five dollars and thirty-three cents, the same shall be
final and conclusive; and each referee shall be entitled to receive one dollar for.
every day he shall have attended in each case: Provided, That if the defendant
shall, before the trial of the action, make oath or affirmation that the title to lands
will come in question in the said action, then the justice or alderman shall dismiss
the same ; and in case of such dismissal, the costs shall be paid in equal shares by the
plaintiff and defendant: Provided always, that if the damages so found by the justice,
alderman or referees, shall not amount to more than one dollar, the plaintiff or
plaintiffs shall not recover more costs than damages.
Sxor. 3. Hither party shall have the right of appealing to the court of common
pleas of the proper county, where the judgment given by the justice or alderman
alone shall exceed five dollars and thirty-three cents, and where judgment given on
the award of referees shall exceed twenty dollars.
Sxor. 4. The process, return thereof, notices, awards, judgments and appeals,
and the proceedings of justices, constables, referees and courts, and every proceeding
necessary to carry this act into effect, which is not herein specially provided for,
shall be made and done, under and according to the provisions and regulations in
similar cases contained in the act, entitled “‘an act to amend and consolidate with
its supplements the act, entitled ‘an act for the recovery of debts and demands
not exceeding one hundred dollars, before a justice of the peace, and for the election
of constables and for other purposes.’ ”’
Srcr. 5. Nothing in this act contained shall be construed to extend to actions
of ejectment, replevin or slander, actions on real contracts for the sale or convey-
ance of lands and tenements, actions for damages in personal assault and battery,
wounding or maiming, or to actions for false imprisonment.
Szor. 7. The said alderman and justices shall take cognisance, by amicable suit,
of all causes of action within their jurisdiction, whether such jurisdiction arises
from this act, or from an act to amend and consolidate, with its supplements, the
act entitled ‘an act for the recovery of debts and demands not exceeding one
hundred dollars, before a justice of the peace, and for the election of constables,
and for other purposes.”’
II. Act 26 Marcu 1814. Purd. 1148.
Szor. 1. If any referee appointed under the third section of the act to which
this is a supplement, or under an act regulating the proceedings of justices of the
peace and aldermen in cases of trespass, trover and rent, shall not attend at the time
and place fixed for hearing the cause, it shall be the duty of the referee or referees
present (where the parties cannot agree on the person or person to supply the
vacancy, or where only one of the parties attends), to appoint proper persons in
place of those who may be absent, and the referees thus appointed shall have the
same authority as those originally appointed.
Sgcr. 2. The said referees shall be sworn or affirmed by an alderman or justice
of the peace, or they may swear and affirm each other, and then any of them shall
have power to administer oaths or affirmations to witnesses, in the cause before
them ; and the said referees, or a majority of them, shall have power to adjourn
their meetings to any other time or place, and as often as they may deem proper.
Aor 13 Fespruary 1816. Purd. 1148.
Szor. 1. In all actions for the recovery of damages for any trespass, wrong or
injury done or committed against real or personal estate brought before any justice
of the peace or alderman of this commonwealth, and referred agreeably to law, the
referees are hereby empowered, in addition to their report of the damages, if any
sustained by the plaiatiff, to decide and report also whether the plaintiff or defend-
ant shall pay the costs of such actions or in what proportion they shall be paid by
the plaintiff or defendant respectively ; on which report judgment shall be entered
as well for the costs as the damages, and execution shall issue as in other cases, any-
thing in the 2d section of the act, entitled “an act regulating the proceedings of
justices of the peace and aldermen in cases of trespass, trover and rent,” passed the
22d day of March 1814, or in any other act, to the contrary notwithstanding.
TRESPASS AND TROVER. 885
‘ Act 26 Aprin 1855. Purd. 1148.
Szot 1. No action brought before a justice of the peace or alderman shall be
referred to referees for trial, unless by the agreement or express assent of both
parties to the action, or the agents, which agreement or assent shall be noted by
such justice or alderman upon his docket.
III. The action of trespass lies for immediate (injuries to the person) or to the
personal or real property of another, accompanied with force, either actual or implied,
whether the act be wilful or unintentional, or whether it be committed by the
defendant or by another at his command or procurement, or, having been done for
his use or benefit, he afterwards assents to it. Where, however, the injury is conse-
quential or collateral, case is the proper remedy.!
Trespass on the case is an action brought for the recovery of damages, for acts
unaccompanied with force, and which in their consequences only are injurious ; for
though an act may be in itself lawful, yet if in its effects or consequences, it is pro-
ductive of any injury to another, it subjects the party to this action.» Justices have
no jurisdiction of actions of trespass on the case. ‘“ Whether the injury complained
of arises directly or follows consequentially from the act of the defendant, I consider
as the only just criterion of trespass and case.’”*
If an act done cause immediate injury, whether it be intentional or not, trespass
lies ; and if done by the co-operation of several persons, all are trespassers, and all
may be sued jointly, or one is liable for the injury done by all; but it must appear
that they acted in concert, or that the act of the one sued naturally and ordinarily
produced the acts of the others.
The jurisdiction conferred on justices of the peace by the act of 1814, is concur-
rent with that of the common pleas.®
To give jurisdiction to a magistrate, in trespass, the damage must form an actual
or immediate injury operating upon the body of the property.” It is not necessary,
however, that an actual loss should be proved; every entry upon the close of
another, without his permission, unless justified and authorized by law, is a trespass
for which suit may be brought before an alderman or justice of the peace.® Thus, a
justice has jurisdiction of an action of trespass for entering the plaintiffs house,
and making a noise and disturbance therein, although no actual loss be proved ;?
and for intruding into the plaintiff’s dwelling-house and refusing to leave when
directed.”
The law is settled, that none but the person in possession of the land can main-
tain trespass quare clausum fregit.” A tenant may sustain an action of trespass
quare clausum fregit against his landlord, for an injury done to his waygoing crop,
after the expiration of the lease, and after he had removed from the premises.”
An owner of the freehold may cut or carry away the grain or grass of one in wrong-
ful possession, without subjecting himself to a recovery against him in an action of .
trespass." : : ;
In an action of trespass before a justice of the peace, for cutting: timber on the
land of the plaintiff, it is not error, that the record do not show in what county
the land is situate.™ aa ;
To stay proceedings in an action of trespass before a justice, the affidavit, under the
second section of the act of 1814, that the title to lands will come in question, must
be positive; it is not sufficient to swear to the best of the deponent’s knowledge and
belief® It was too late to make such objection, after the case comes into the com-
mon pleas by appeal.
In the case of personal chattels, he who has the general property need not prove
possession, because the law draws the possession to the property; but one who
1 . Gaz. BR. 20. 9139, & RB. 417-20.
2 ip ep son oe 10 13 Leg. Int. 29.
3138. &@ RB. 420, 1 Ash. 152. 112 Bro. 109. 4.218. 5 Whart. 539.
41 Camp. 497, Ellenborough, C. J. a. 8 W. 282.
5 19 Johns. 381. 26 Penn. St. 482. 5 Ibid. 543. '
648 & R417. 6 Ibid. 87. 1Ash. 192, 52 1 3 Clark 295. 2 Ibid. 169.
Penn. Sv. 444. 18 Carpenter v. Koons, Purd. 1000 n.
6 Binn. 33. 16 20 Penn. St. 464. See 1 Wood. 405.
1
7
8 13 Leg. Int. 29. 3 Phila. 424.
886 TRESPASS AND TROVER.
claims only a special property, must prove that he once had actual possession, without
which no special property is complete.’ In trespass for taking and carrying away
the plaintiff's goods, it is not necessary for him to show title, in the first instance ;
his possession is sufficient, and the defendant must show a better right in himself?
Where a quantity of corn was taken from the owner by a wilful trespasser, and
converted by him into whiskey, held, that the property was not changed, and that
the whiskey belonged to the owner of the original material; and was liable to be
seized in execution to satisfy his debt. If a chattel wrongfully taken retains its
original form and substance, or may be reduced to its original materials, it belongs
to the original owner; and, this rule, zt seems, holds against an innocent purchaser
from the wrongdoer, without regard to the increased value bestowed by him upon
the chattel. But if it be converted by an ¢nnocent purchaser or holder into a thing
of a different species, as where wheat is made into bread, olives into oil, or grapes
into wine, the original owner cannot reclaim it.
There is no such distinction, however, in favor of a wilful wrongdoer. He can
acquire no property in the goods of another by any change wrought in them by his
labor or skill, however great the change may be, provided it can be proved that the
improved article was made from the original material.
A recovery in an action of trespass, for the taking of the goods of the plaintiff
divests his property in the goods.®
Trespass lies against a constable who seizes the property of a defendant under an
execution, and refuses him the benefit of the exemption law.®
IV. TROVER AND CONVERSION.
The action of trover and conversion lies for the recovery of damages for the
wrongful conversion of personal property, whether consisting of merchandise, money,
bonds, notes, title-deeds or any other chattel merely personal, in which a man may
have a valuable property."
This action reaches all cases where one man has obtained the goods of another by
any means, and has sold or used them without the assent of the owner, or has
refused to deliver them on demand. It is confined to the conversion of some per-
sonal property, and it does not lie for injuries to land or other real estate, even by
a severance of a part from the freehold, unless there be also an asportation. But
if, after severance from the freehold, as in the case of trees, the property severed be
taken away, or, if coals dug from a pit be afterwards thrown out, trover will lie by
a person having the right and possession, against a mere intruder and trespasser.®
So, where the trunks of trees blown down by a tempest, are cut and carried
away by a tenant, trover is the proper remedy for the owner or lessor. It lies for
money, though it be not in a bag, or otherwise distinguishable from other coin,
because the thing itself is not to be recovered in this action, but merely damages for
the conversion.®
This action in Pennsylvania is an equitable remedy, and therefore, if a defendant
have an equitable or legal lien on the property in his possession, it may be set up
and allowed by the jury (or the justice) in assessing damages,!°
If a man puts a chattel into the possession of a mechanic to repair, and he
pledges it, the owner can maintain trover against the pawnbroker. The pawnee
can have no greater property in the thing pawned than the pawnor himself had."
The conversion of one partner of property which came into possession of the
firm on partnership account, is the conversion of all, and makes all liable in trover.
Trover will not lie for goods seized by virtue of legal process, and in the custody
of the law.’ But it lies against a common carrier who puts goods on a wharf, for
such part of them as are lost, or not actually delivered to the consignee.
In order to support this action, the plaintiff must show property in himself, and
a wrongful conversion by the defendant ; and this property must be either absolute
1358. & R. 612-13. 8358. & R. 515. And see 101 Penn. St. 265.
22 W. 180. 9128. & R. 272.
3 3N. Y. 3879. 2R. 428. 10 3 Ibid. 563.
4 Ibid. 1 Bouv. Inst. 199. N 1 Bro. 43.
51K, 121. 24 R, 120.
6 28 Penn. St. 238. 3 Gr. 240. See 7 Phila. 1 9 Johns. 381.
207. 1415 Ibid. 39,
1 1 Chit. Plead. 148. 2 Y. 537.
TRESPASS AND TROVER. 887
or special ; but it is unnecessary that the plaintiff should ever have had the actual
possession, for it is a rule of law, that the property of personal chattels draws to it
the possession. The nature of absolute property is very readily understood, and
requires no explanation ; a special property is the consequence of a rightful posses-
sion for a particular and special purpose.”
As to the other essential ingredient of this action, the conversion, it is to be
observed, that every assumption of property in, or exercise of authority over, the
goods of another, inconsistent with the title of the rightful owner, or in exclusion
of his right, is a conversion.’ As, if a bailee use or misuse the thing delivered to
him,‘ or deliver it to a stranger; or where the factor pledges the goods of his prin-
cipal for his own debt.®
The wrongful taking and carrying away another person’s goods is, itself, a con-
version.© But where goods have come lawfully into the defendant’s possession, and
there has been no actual conversion, the plaintiff must demand them, and the
defendant refuse to deliver them up, in order to constitute a conversion.”
There are exceptions to this rule; as, where the possessor, on demand by the
owner or his agent, answers that he is ready to deliver them, on being satisfied that
the demandant is really the owner or agent, no conversion can be inferred. But
where the possessor refuses to deliver them because of a claim of his own to owner-
ship, of of alien which he asserts he has on them, such refusal falls within the
general rule, and is evidence of a conversion.®
It is no objection to the action, that the plaintiff has subsequently repossessed
himself of the property, for he is still entitled to damages for the injury sustained.?
The value of the property at the time of the demand is the measure of damages ;
but compensation may also be made for an aggravation of the injury by peculiar
circumstances in the taking or detention.’° ;
Though trover may lie for a certificate of stock as it does for a bond or deed, yet
it will not lie for a certain number of shares of stock claimed by the plaintiff.4
As a general principle, the defendant in an action of trover may show title in a
third person.”
If the owner of goods brings an action of trespass or trover against one who has
sold his goods without authority, and obtains a judgment equal to the value of the
goods, the right of property in the goods is changed, so that he cannot maintain an
action afterwards for the goods, against the vendee of the defendant; and this,
although the first judgment should not be satisfied.*
Constructive possession of unoccupied land is sufficient to support trover for the
asportation and conversion of trees felled thereon.
If an executor séparate certain articles of property from those of his testator, and
declares them bequeathed to the legatee, it is such a delivery as will enable the
latter to maintain trover for them.
He who parts with the possession of his property for the purpose of defrauding
his creditors, cannot maintain trover to recover it back. But after bis death, if his
estate be otherwise insufficient to pay his debts, the action of trover survives to his
personal representatives, who may prosecute it for the benefit of creditors.”*
Riding a horse taken up as an estray, for the purpose of discovering the owner,
is not such an act of conversion as will support an action of trover. A neglect, by
one who takes charge of an estray, to pursue the course prescribed by the statute,
does not make him liable to an action of trover, unless he use the estray, or refuse
to deliver it up on demand.” os :
A lessee cannot maintain trover against his landlord, after the expiration of his
term, for fixtures which he had attached to the freehold, during his tenancy, but
suffered to remain thereon.® Nor can one tenant in common of a chattel maintain
trover against his co-tenant for the mere detention of the article.”
12P.&W.45. 1Y. 19. 3 Ibid. 333. 33 Penn. St. 251.
277, RB. 392. 1 Bac. Abr. 50. 178. & R. 285,
8 7 Johns. 254, 306. 10 Ibid. 175. 124W.241. See 107 Penn. St. 297.
4 2 Saund. 47 f. 13 4 R. 285-6.
5 14 Johns. 128. ug WwW. 172.
6 15 Ibid. 431. 16 7 Ibid. 570.
7 2 Saund. 47 e. 16 6 Ibid. 453.
865. & R. 305. 17 7 Ibid. 557.
91Johns. 65. 7 Ibid. 254. 10 Ibid. 176. 12 101 Penn. St. 265.
e
S
12 8. & BR. 89,94. 6 Ibid. 300. 4 W.418. 1 102 Ibid. 533.
[ 888 ]
Vaqrants.
[See Tramps.]
I. Acts of assembly. II. Judicial decisions.
I. Aor 8 May 1876. Purd. 2066.
Sgor. 1. The following described persons are hereby declared to be vagrants :!
I. All persons who shall unlawfully return into any district whence they have
been legally removed, without bringing a certificate from the proper authorities
of the city or district to which they belong, stating that they have a settlement
therein.
II. All persons who shall refuse to perform the work which shall be allotted to
them by the overseers of the poor, as provided by the act of June 13th, 1836,
entitled, “an act relating to the support and employment of the poor.”
III. All persons going about from door to door, or placing themselves in streets,
highways or other roads, to beg or gather alms, and all persons wandering abroad
and begging, who have no fixed place of residence in the township, ward or borough
in which the vagrant is arrested.?
IV. All persons who shall come from any place without this commonwealth to
any place within it, and shall be found loitering or residing therein, and shall fol-
low no labor, trade, occupation or business, and have no visible means of subsist-
ence, and can give no reasonable account of themselves or their business in such
lace.
Szor. 2. If any person shall be found offending, in any township or place, against
this act, it shall and may be lawful for any constable or police officer of such town-
ship or place, and he is hereby enjoined. and required, on notice thereof given him
_ by auy of the inhabitants thereof, or without such notice, on his own view, to appre-
hend and convey, or cause to be conveyed, such person to a justice of the peace or
other committing magistrate of the county, who shall examine such person and
shall commit him, being thereof legally convicted before him, on his own view or
by the confession of such offender, or by the oath or affirmation of one or more
credible witnesses, to labor upon any county farm or upon the roads and highways
of any city, township or borough, or in any house of correction, poor-house, work-
house or common jail, for a term of uot less than thirty days and not exceeding
six months, and shall forthwith commit him to the custody of the steward, keeper
or superintendent of such county farm, house of correction, poor-house, work-
house or common jail, or to the supervisors or street commissioners and overseers
of the poor of the respective county, city, borough or township wherein such
person shall be found, as in his judgment shall be deemed most expedient. The
said justice of the peace or committing magistrate, in every case of conviction, shall
make up and sign a record of conviction, annexing thereto the names and records
of the different witnesses examined before him, and shall, by warrant, under hand,
commit such person as aforesaid: Provided, Any person or persons who shall con-
ceive him, her or themselves aggrieved by any act, judgment or determination of
any justice of the peace or alderman, in and concerning the execution of this act,
may appeal to the present or next general quarter sessions of the city or county,
giving reasonable notice thereof, whose orders thereupon shall be final.
Szor. 3. [t shall be the duty of the custodian or custodians of any such vagrant,
to make active efforts to provide work for every vagrant committed under this act,
and not disqualified by sickness, old age (or) casualty ; and whenever labor cannot
be provided in the place to which any vagrant is committed, it shall be lawful for
such custodian or custodians, and it is hereby declared to be his or their duty,
with the approval of the board of directors, overseers, guardians or commissioners
of the poor, as the case may be, to contract with the proper authorities of any
1 See Lewis’ Or. L. 591. 5 Binn. 516. 2 Pars. 28 N.C,
458. 1 Ash. 248, wea eran
VAGRANTS. 889
such township, borough, city, county or other persons, to do any work or labor
outside the place of commitment; in all cases the work or labor shall be suited to
the proper discipline, health and capacity of such vagrant, and he shall be fed and
clothed in a manner suited to the nature of the work engaged in and the condition
of the season; and when any vagrant is committed under the provisions of this
act to the custody of the supervisors or street commissioners and overseers of the poor
of any township, borough, city or county, it shall be their duty to provide for him
comfortable lodging or quarters, either in a station-house or other building. The
violation or neglect of any of the provisions of this section shall be deemed to be a
misdemeanor, and the person so offending, on conviction thereof, in the proper
court, shall be sentenced to undergo an imprisonment for a term not exceeding
three months, and to pay a fine not exceeding one hundred dollars, either or both,
in the discretion of the court.
Szor. 4. If any person, not being in the county, township or place in which he
usually lives or has his home, shall apply to any director, overseer, guardian or com-
missioner of the poor of any county, city, borough, township or district, stating
that he is desirous to return to his home, but is poor and has not the means to do
so, the said director, overseer, guardian or commissioner of (the poor) may employ
or let out such poor person to labor, at some suitable place to be by them selected,
and at such wages as shall seem to them just, and when, in the opinion of said
director, overseer, guardian or commissioner of the poor, such poor person shall
have earned a sufficient sum, said director, overseer, guardian or commissioner of
the poor shall, with the money so earned, and with such additions thereto from the
treasury of the county, city, borough, township or district as they may think rea-
sonable, cause such person to be returned to his home, whether in this state or else-
where: Provided, That the expense shall not exceed twenty dollars.
Szcr. 5. The custodian or custodians of such vagrant may, at discretion, dis-
charge such vagrant at any time within the term of commitment, upon not less
than ten days’ good behavior, or upon satisfactory security that he shall not become
a charge upon the public within one year from the date of such discharge. :
Sxcr. 6. The county commissioners of every county in which there shall not be
sufficient provision for the safe custody of persons committed under this act, upon
the recommendation of a grand jury of the county and approval of the court, are
hereby empowered and required to make suitable provisions by buildings or inclo-
sures: Provided, That the expenses of the same shall not exceed the amount fixed
by the grand jury.
Srcr. 7. For each arrest, hearing or commitment, made under this act, there shall
be paid out of the county treasury, to the committing magistrate and the officer
making such arrest or commitment, the sum of fifty cents each, and mileage as
now provided by law, when such arrest is made more than one mile from the prison
or place where such vagrant shall be committed, and no mileage shall be allowed to
any officer making the arrest within one mile of the prison or place where such
vagrant shall be committed. And no person shall be detained beyond the term
of his or her commitment, by reason of his or her inability to pay the costs of his
or her arrest, hearing and commitment, but shall forthwith be discharged by the
officer in whose custody he may be. Any wilful refusal to make such arrest, on
the part of any constable or police officer, shall subject him to a penalty of five
dollars, to be collectible as penalties are collectible, and shall be paid into the poor
fund of the district in which such officer resides, if such poor fund exists, and into
the county treasury, where such poor fund does not exist. : ;
Szcr. 8. All poor-houses, alms-houses and other places provided for the keeping
of the poor, are hereby declared to be work-houses for the purposes of this act ;
and it is hereby made the duty of the custodians of such buildings to provide work
for such vagrants, and to compel them to work therein, when able, not less than
six hours per day. —_ ;
Szor. 9. The custodian of any vagrant, upon his discharge and at his request,
shall give him a certificate of discharge, which shall exempt him from any further
arrest for vagrancy for a period of five days, upon condition that he shall forthwith
‘eave the county wherein confined: and the said custodian is hereby authorized to
1 So amended, by act 3 May 1878. Pamph. 40.
890 VAGRANTS.
give, in his discretion, to such discharged vagrant, a reasonable sum of money out
of his earnings, or out of the treasury of the township, borough, city or county, to
defray his expenses in leaving the county aforesaid.
Aot 13 Junz 1883. Purd. 2067.
Scr. 1. Whenever in any city of the first class in the commonwealth, there
shall be established two or more wayfarers’ lodges, or places where homeless and
destitute persons can be fed and sheltered during the night, by any association of
citizens for organizing charity or for charitable purposes, and such association shall
ask any person who shall receive shelter and food in any such lodge, and shall have
been notified before their admission that they will be required to labor in return
therefor, to perform work for a space not exceeding four hours, in return for such
shelter and food,and the person so receiving shelter and food shall refuse to perform
work, and shall be physically able to work, it shall be the duty of the superinten-
dent, or any other officer of such lodge, to cause such person to be brought forthwith
before a magistrate of such city, and upon proof before him that such person has
received shelter and food in such lodge, has refused to perform work for a space of
four hours in return therefor, and is physically able to perform the work demanded,
his refusal shall be evidence of vagrancy, and such magistrate may commit such
person to the house of correction as a vagrant, for a period not exceeding thirty
days.
Bron 2. Any person who shall deem himself aggrieved by the decision of the
magistrate in respect to his action under the first section of this act, may appeal
from such decision to the same or next term of the court of quarter sessions of the
county, upon giving bail in a sum not exceeding one hundred dollars, which court
shall have power to review, modify, reverse or affirm the order of the magistrate
as to justice may appertain.
Szor. 3. As soon as the said wayfarers’ lodges shall have been made ready to
receive applicants, and proper notice thereof shall have been given to the munici-
pal authorities of the city, the said municipal authorities shall thereupon prohibit
the admission, for the purpose of remaining over-night, at all station-houses, or
other similar places, of any person, so far as in their judgment the same may be
expedient and practicable.
III. Vagrants are, since the repeal of the act of 8th February 1766, on the same
footing in the city of Philadelphia, that they are in other parts of the state, and,
therefore, a magistrate of the city of Philadelphia may lawfully commit any vagrant
found therein, to prison, to be kept at hard labor for any time not exceeding one
month, on conviction, according to the act of the 21st February 1767.7
Under the acts of assembly relating to the “ house of refuge,’’ the adjudication
of a magistrate, on a charge of vagrancy and crime, is in no respect conclusive, but
the whole subject is open on the hearing of a habeas corpus, when it is incumbent
on the managers to show affirmatively, and from evidence, that the child detained
in their custody is a proper subject for the house of refuge, within the true intent
and meaning of their charter. Whenever it is made to appear, affirmatively and
clearly, that a male ‘or female child, who exhibits knowledge and capacity to com-
mit a crime, and who, if a male, is within the age of 21, and if a female, is within
the age of 18, has been guilty of vagrancy, he or she may lawfully be committed
to the house of refuge. Admitting that there may be a case in which a child under
14 may justly be adjudged a vagrant, yet the circumstances of such case ought to
be urgent, unequivocal and decisive. A father cannot transfer the custody of the
person of his child to the managers of the house of refuge, unless the child is
adjudged a proper subject for the house of refuge, by due course of law’
“There is another class of offenders, called ‘disorderly persons, in our acts of
assembly. What constitutes this offence, is not, perhaps, so well understood. The
acts done, or duties neglected, that make one an idle or disorderly person, are all
pointed out in the act of the 21st of February 1767, and thesé are all embraced
1 See act 21 March 1866, Purd. 2068, asto the Yorkcounty ; and act 9 April 1870, P. h. 1005
eounties of Crawford, Erie, Venango and Warren; as to Lebanon county. " ore :
act 11 April 1866, Pamph. 720, as to Franklin 21Sm. 268. 5 Binn. 516.
county; act 4 April 1870, Pamph. 844, as to 3 1 Ash. 248,
VAGRANTS. 891
within the act of the 13th of June 1836, where the offence of vagrancy has been
clearly described in the various classes of offences already quoted. If this term is
to have no greater signification than what is given to it by the act of 1767, then
all who fall within its description are made vagabonds by the act of 13th June 1836,
and then there are no offenders who can be called ‘ disorderly’ persons ; but we
must suppose that the legislature intended to use them assynonymous terms. But
did the legislature intend that the term ‘ disorderly’ should have any more extended
application against the good order of society, than what is understood by the term
‘vagrant,’ in the act of 1836? I am inclined to think they did; for we must pre-
sume that the law-making power perfectly understood the terms which they have
used. What, then, is understood by the word disorderly? When applied to
society, it means, lawless, contrary to law, inclined to break loose from restraint,
unruly; in a manner, violating law and good order, contrary to rules or established
institutions. Such is the definition given to the word by one of our best American
lexicographers.
“ The act of 17 Geo. IT. ch. 5, speaks of ‘ ¢dle and disorderly persons,’ and vagrants,
or rogues and vagabonds, as two distinct classes of offenders; and the act of
the 21st of February 1767, copies portions of this act of parliament, and calls
all such offenders ‘ idle and disorderly persons.” The act of 13th of June 1836,
speaks of some offences not embraced in the former act, and also describes all who
are mentioned in the acts of 1767, and calls all such vagrants—and yet in the same
session, as appears by the act of the 22d of March 1836, provision is made for the
punishment of disorderly persons. Now, it seems to me, that, so far as these laws
have relation to the city and county of Philadelphia, we may well suppose that
many offenders who are not vagrants within the meaning of the act of 13th June
1836, are ‘ disorderly persons,’ and may be punished as such by the law of the 22d
March of that year. If such was the meaning of the legislature, then no violation
of the rules of good order in the community can well occur, without the offender
rendering himself obnoxious to punishment by some of the laws which I have
referred to in the course of these remarks, on the judgment of a local magistrate,
unless the offence is of that grade which makes it the subject of an indictment.
“Tn my opinion, there are offences which would not render one a vagrant, within
the meaning of the law, yet would make him a disorderly person, within the true
meauing of the term; and a magistrate may convict him as such. When a person
is proved before a magistrate to be a ‘ disorderly person,’ the punishment is the
same as that inflicted upon a vagrant; he may be sentenced to the county prison
for a period not exceeding thirty days. To make such a conviction a valid one, I
think the magistrate ought to state clearly upon his record, the acts done by the
offender, which makes him a disorderly person. Nor is he bound to make a return
of such conviction to the court, unless the case comes up in course before the court of
quarter sessions. The party aggrievéd by the decision of a magistrate has the
right of appeal.
“Tt would be difficult, if not impossible, to enumerate the cases where a com-
mitting magistrate ought to commit one as a‘ disorderly person,’ for a correct decision
of each case must depend upon the facts disclosed upon the hearing. The term ‘ dis-
orderly’ is certainly very extensive in its signification, and all who violate the peace
and good order of society are liable to be punished, either as vagrants, disorderly, or
for a breach of the public peace, or should be bound for their good behavior. Hach
ease should be carefully considered by the magistrate, and no one should be impro-
perly committed; at the same time, whenever the law has been violated, or the
good order of society has been disturbed, there should be such an efficient admin-
istration of the law as is calculated to protect the public against future aggressions.’
12 Pars. 58. And see 3 Leg. Int., 16 Deo. 1846.
| 892 j
Cagers.
I. Of the nature and character of wagers. III. Wagers on a horse-race.
II. Wagers on elections.
I. Lorp ELLENBoROUGH refused to try an action upon a wager on a cock -fight,
observing, it was impossible to be engaged in ludicrous Inquiries of this sort, consist
ently with that dignity which it was essential a court of justice should preserve.
In another case, which was a wager whether a person might be lawfully arrested for
a sum under £40, his lordship threw down the record with great dispieasure, say-
ing, “I certainly will not try this cause. I sit here to decide points of law that
arise incidentally before me, and the decision of which is necessary for the purposes
of justice—not to state my opinion upon any question submitted to me from idle
curiosity. I consider the attempt extremely indecent.”? On the other hand, an
action was held to be maintainable on a wager of a “‘rump and dozen,’’ whether the
defendant was older than the plaintiff. Mr. Serjeant Vaughan urged, with his
usual effect, that instead of any public prejudice arising from the thing betted, it
was for the public benefit, to promote conviviality and good humor. Mansfield,
C. J., indeed, said, ‘he did not, judicially, know the meaning of a ‘rump and
dozen.’”’ But Heath, J., observed, that they knew very well, privately, that
a “rump and dozen” was what the witness stated, namely, a good dinner and wine;
“in which,” said the learned judge, ‘I can discover no illegality.” Chambré, J.,
added, that ‘the witness had explained the ‘rump and dozen’ to mean a good
dinner, and this is sufficiently certain. Then where is the immorality? Is it
impossible for people to sit down to a good dinner, without being guilty of excess ?’’
But whatever may be the law in England, or in any of our sister states, on the
subject of wagers, in Pennsylvania, it is settled, that an action cannot be maintained
to recover a sum of money, alleged to have been lost by the defendant to the plain-
tiff, upon a wager or bet.*
As every bet about the age, or height, or wealth, or circumstances or situation
of any person, is either malicious, or indecent, or impertinent, or indelicate, such
bets are illegal, and no court ought, in any case, to sustain a suit on such wager;
and this, whether the subject of the bet was man, or woman or child, married or
single, native or foreigner, in this country or abroad. I hold, that no bet of any
kind, about any human being, is recoverable in a court of justice.®
In an action against the drawer of a check upon a bank, evidence is admissible,
on the part of the defendant, to prove that the check was drawn in pursuance cf
an agreement, by which a sum of money was bet by the defendant with the plain-
tiff, upon a certain event ; and such consideration having been proved, the defendant
is entitled to a verdict.®
A notice to a stakeholder not to pay over money deposited in his hands, upon an
illegal wager, must come from the owner of the money. A notice from the person
who made the bet and deposited the money, on behalf of the owner, is ineffectual
to enable the owner to recover it back.’
II. WaGERs ON ELECTIONS.®
The statute against betting on elections, was intended to avoid all bets, paid or
unpaid, and to suppress anything connected with the subject ; it cannot, therefore,
be eluded by any appended agreement, which would give to an actual wager the
similitude of something else.®
All contracts or promises, depending upon a bet on the result of an election, are
oull and void; ingenuity cannot invent any mode of evidencing such contract, 80
that it can be enforced by law.!®
: oe : 6 Whart. 176.
2 Ibid. . 2W.& S. 69.
3 3 Ibid. 161. 8 See tit. ‘ Rleotions’ XV.
46 Whart. 176. . 27 W. 343.
6 1R, 42-3, Huston, J. 10 Tbid. 294.
‘
WAGERS. ' 893
A., the winner of a bet on the gubernational election of 1841, brought suit against
B., the stakeholder, who had omitted to deliver up the money, after the loser had
directed him to pay it to the winner, or to his order: Held, that since the act of
2d July 1839, relating to elections, the plaintiff could not recover either the whole
sum deposited, or the share deposited by himself. Upon a deposit being made, to
secure a bet on an election, the mouey, eo instant, vests in the guardians of the poor ;
and their omission to sue for it within the time limited by statute, does not give to
either of the wagering parties the right to recover any portion of the sum deposited.
Money contributed by individuals, and deposited in the hands of a stakeholder as
a wager upon the result of an election, cannot be recovered back, in a joint action
by the contributors?
Money lost by a wager upon an election, and paid over to the winner, cannot be
recovered back from him by means of a foreign attachment, at the suit of a creditor
of the loser.’
Money lent in New Jersey, to bet upon the presidential election, may be recovered
in Pennsylvania, in absence of any proof that betting on elections is against the
law of New Jersey.*
A wager on the result of a presidential election made after the closing of the
polls, is illegal, and the deposit may be recovered from the stakeholder by the direct-
ors of the poor.®
III. WaGERs ON A HORSE-RACE.®
If a bet be made on a horse-race, the money deposited with a stakeholder asa for-
feit, in case of the party not appearing, may be recovered back by the loser. If the
stakeholder pays the money to whom it was forfeited, without notice, and in good
faith, he is protected by the limitation contained in the act of assembly ; otherwise,
if he acted unfairly and counived with one of the parties.’
Money staked on a horse-race may be recovered by the better, either from the:
winner or the stakeholder. Where a sum of money is raised by the contributions
of several persons, to be bet upon a horse-race, and the same is deposited in the
hands of the stakeholder by one of the contributors, such contributor can recover
back from the stakeholder only that part of the money which he contributed, and
not the whole deposit. In such action against the stakeholder, he may give evi-:
dence to show that part of the money staked was counterfeit, although it be not
produced on the trial.®
12 5 1 Chest. Co. R. 25.
23 W.&S. 405. 8 See tit. “ Horse-Racing.”
3 6 Ibid. 486. 73 P. & W. 468.
41 8 Thid. 494.
[ 894 J
Tlaqes.
I. Right to wages. V. Exemption.
II. Priority of trial. VI. Claims for wages.
III. Appeals from justices. VII. Attachment of wages.
IV. Stay of execution. VIII. Payment of wages.
I. Act 23 May 1887. Purd. 2073.
Secr. 1. Any individual, partnership or corporation, who or which requires from
persons in his or its employ, under penalty of forfeiture of part of wages earned by
them, a notice of intention to leave such employ, shall be liable to pay to the party
injured a sum equal to the amount of said forfeiture, if he or it discharges, without
similar notice, a person in such employ, except for incapacity or misconduct, unless
in case of a general suspension of labor in his or its mine, shop or factory, or a suspen-
sion of work ordered by the employés of such individual, partnership or corporation.
Sror. 2, Suit may be brought by any person or persons interested under the pro-
visions of the first section of this act before any of the magistrates or justices of the
peace of this commonwealth having jurisdiction for the recovery of the sum or sums
of money as are required to be paid by the employer or employers under the first sec-
tion of this act.
II. Act 22 Marcu 1877. Purd. 2073.
Sect. 1. In all cases now pending, or which may hereafter be brought, before any
court in this commonwealth, for the recovery of the wages of manual labor only, it
shall be the duty of the prothonotary preparing the list of civil causes, to place all
claims for wages of labor first on the list, and the court shall proceed to try all such
cases as they occur on the list: Provided, That a statement of the plaintiff's claim
be filed in such cases, showing that the claims respectively are for manual labor
alone.
III. Acr 9 Aprit 1872. Purd. 2073.
Sct. 5. In all cases of appeal from the judgment of justices of the peace, for
wages or moneys mentioned in the first section of this act, the party appellant, his
agent or attorney, shall make oath or affirmation, that it is not for the purpose of
delay that such appeal is entered, but because he firmly believes injustice has been
done. The bail required in cases of appeal from the judgments of justices of the
peace, and from the awards of arbitrators, for the wages and moneys mentioned in
the first section of this act, shall be bail absolute in double the amount of said judg-
ment and awards, and the probable amount of costs accrued and likely to accrue in
such cases, with one or more sufficient sureties, conditioned for the payment of the
amount of the debt, interest and cost that shall be legally recovered in such case
against the appellant.
Act 20 ApRiL 1876. Purd. 2074.
Sxcr. 1. In all cases in which judgment shall have been rendered by any justice of
the peace or alderman in this commonwealth for wages of manual labor, before the
defendant shall be entitled to an appeal from the judgment of the justice or alderman,
he, or his agent or attorney, shall make oath or affirmation that the appeal is not in-
tended for the purpose of delay, but that he believes that injustice has been done
him, which affidavit shall be attached to and sent up with the transcript of appeal.
1 See 14 W. N, 0. 255,
WAGES. 895
And the said defendant shall be required to give good and sufficient bail or the pay-
ment of the debt and costs, to be paid when finally adjudged to be due the plaintiff
by the court, in all cases for labor.
IV. Aor 14 May 1871. Purd. 2074.
No stay of execution shall be allowed on any judgment for one hundred dollars and
less, when the same has been recovered for wages of manual labor.
Act 24 Junm 1885. Purd. 2074.
In all cases of judgments before aldermen, city recorders and justices of the peace in
this commonwealth, where the defendant is a freeholder, or enters bail absolute, with
one or mcre sufficient sureties, in double the amount of debt or damages, interest and
costs recovered, conditioned for the payment thereof, in the event that the defendant
fails to pay the same at the expiration of the stay of execution, and the judgment ren-
dered shall be above five dollars and thirty-three cents, and not exceeding twenty
dollars, there shall be a stay of three months; and where the judgment shall be above
twenty dollars and not exceeding sixty dollars, there shall be a stay of six months;
and where the judgment shall be above sixty dollars and not exceeding three hundred
dollars, there shall be a stay of execution for nine months: Provided, That this act:
shall not apply to judgments obtained for wages of manual labor.
V. Act 4 Marcu 1887. Purd. 834.
Sect. 1. No exemption of property from attachment, levy or sale upon execution,
shall be allowed upon judgments for one hundred dollars or less obtained for wages for
manual labor.
VI. Act 12 May 1891. Purd. 2074.
All moneys that may be due or hereafter become due for labor and services ren-
dered by any miner or mechanic, servant girl at hotels, boarding-houses, restaurants
or in private families, or any other servant and helper in and about said houses of en-
tertainment and private families, porter, hostler or any other person employed in and
about livery stables or hotels, laundryman or washerwoman, seamster or seamstress
employed by merchant tailors or by any other person, milliner, dressmaker, clothier,
shirtmaker, or clerk employed in stores or elsewhere, hand laborer, including farm
laborer or any other kind of laborer, printer, apprentice and all other tradesmen hired for
wages or salary from any person or persons, chartered company, joint-stock company,
limited partnership or other partnership, either as owner, lessee, contractor or under-
owner, whether at so much per diem or otherwise, for any period not exceeding six
months preceding the sale or transfer of the real or personal property, works, mines,
manufactories or business or other property connected therewith in carrying on the
same of said person or persons, chartered company, joint-stock company, limited part-
nership or other partnership, by execution or otherwise, on account of the death or
insolvency of such employer'or employers, shall be a lien upon said real or personal
property, mine, manufactory, business or other property in and about, or used in
carrying on said business or in connection therewith, to the extent of the interest of
such employer or employers in said property, and shall be preferred and first paid out
of the proceeds of the sale of such real and personal property, mine, manufactory,
business or other property as aforesaid: Provided, however, That the claim _thus
preferred shall not exceed two hundred dollars: And provided further, That this act
shall not be so construed as to impair contracts existing, or liens of record vested prior
to its passage: And provided further, That no such claim shall be a lien upon any real
estate, unless the same be filed in the prothonotary’s office of the county in which
such real estate is situated, within three months after the same becomes due and
owing, in the same manner as mechanics’ liens are now filed.’
1 56. 1 Wil 185. 10, C.272. 2 This is an amendment of the act 13 June
13 tea ier 7 as 1883, which amended the act 9 April 1872 2 1.
896 WAGES.
Acr 9 APRIL 1872. Purd. 2075.
Sect. 2. In all cases of executions, landlord’s warrants, attachments and writs of a
similar nature, hereafter to be issued against any person or persons, or chartered com-
pany, engaged as before mentioned, it shall be lawful for such miners, laborers, me-
chanics or clerks, to give notice in writing of their claim or claims, and the amount
thereof, to the officers executing either of such writs, at any time before the actual
sale of the property levied on; and such officers shall pay to such miners, laborers,
mechanics and clerks, out of the proceeds.of sale, the amount each is justly and legally
entitled to receive, not exceeding two hundred dollars.
Sxct. 3. In all cases of the death, insolvency or assignment of any person or persons,
or chartered company, engaged in operations as hereinbefore mentioned, or of execu-
tions issued against them, the lien of preference mentioned ‘in the first section of this
act, with the like limitations and powers, shall extend to every property of said person
or chartered company.
Act 20 Aprin 1876. Purd. 2075.
No voluntary assignment for the benefit of creditors shall operate so as to hinder,
delay or prevent, for a longer period than thirty days from the time of such assign-
ment, the collection or enforcement of any of the claims for the wages of labor secured
and protected by the act for the better protection of the wages of mechanics, miners,
laborers and others, approved the 9th day of April 1872, or its supplements; and said
claimants may, after the expiration of thirty days from the date of such assignment,
enforce the collection of their claims, in the same manner, and by means of the same
remedies, that they might have done had no such assignment been made.
Tn all cases of voluntary assignments heretofore made and now remaining unsettled,
and in which the assignee or assignees has or have more than five months within
which to settle his or their account or accounts, any or all of the claimants protected
by the provisions of the aforesaid act, or its supplements, may, immediately after the
passage of this act, proceed to collect such claims just as though no such assignment
had been made; and in case such assigned property has already been sold, and the
assignee or assignees refuse to pay such claimants the amount legally due them, they
shall have the right to compel him or them to file his or their account, and may pro-
ceed to have said claims paid, by a distribution through an auditor or auditors, ac-
cording to law: Provided, however, That the owner or owners of such assigned
property, or the assignee or assignees, or any interested party, may pay to such
claimants the amount of the claims so protected by said act or its supplements, and be
subrogated to the rights of the claimants to the extent of such payments.
Act 9 Aprin 1872. Purd. 2076.
Sct. 4. No mortgage, or other instrument by which a lien is hereafter credited,
(created) shall operate to impair or postpone the lien and preference given and secured
to the wages and moneys mentioned in the first section of this act: Provided, That no
lien of mortgage or judgment entered before such labor is performed, shall be affected
or impaired thereby.
Act 8 May 1874. Purd. 2076.
Sxcr. 1. The proviso in the fourth section of an act, entitled ‘‘ An act for the better
protection of the wages of mechanics, miners, laborers and others,’’ approved the 9th
day of April, Anno Domini 1872, shall not hereafter be so construed as to, in any
manner, apply to coal-lease mortgage or mortgages, or to make the same a lien pre-
ferred to the lien of the wages of labor mentioned in said act, but that such claim of
wages shall be a lien preferred thereto.
WAGES. 897
Act 7 May 1891. Purd. 2076.
All moneys that may be due from any person or persons to any and every laborer,
for work done in and about the cutting, peeling, skidding, hauling and driving of saw-
logs, the hewing, making, skidding and hauling of square timber and the peeling,
skidding and hauling of bark for a period not exceeding six months prior to the death
or assignment for the benefit of creditors of the employer or employers, or to a sale of
said saw-logs, square timber or bark upon execution process against said employer or
employers, shall be preferred and first paid out of the proceeds of any executor’s, ad-
ministrator’s, assignee’s, sheriff’s or other officer’s sale of saw-logs, square timber or
bark as the property of the employer or employers: Provided, That when work as
aforesaid shall have been done for a contractor or contractors and not for the owner or
owners of said saw-logs, square timber or bark, all moneys due as aforesaid shall be
preferred and paid to laborers as aforesaid, and any payment or payments s) made,
shall be a good charge against the contractor or contractors in favor of the owner or
owners in settlement of their account: And provided further, That not more than-two
hundred dollars to any one laborer shall be preferred under this act.
Act 12 Junge 1879. Purd. 2076.
Sect. 2. It shall be the duty of every laborer claiming a preference under this act,
by himself, his agent or attorney, to give notice in writing of the amount of his claim,
before the sale, to the executors, administrators, assignee, sheriff or other officer
whose duty it shall be to sell said saw-logs, otherwise his claim shall not be preferred
under this act.
Srcr. 3. When there shall be any dispute concerning the right of any laborer to be
preferred as aforesaid, or as to the amount he shall be entitled to receive, the court
having jurisdiction of the accounts of the officer making the sale, or of the process
under which the sale is made, shall have power, after reasonable notice given, either
personally or by advertisement, to hear and determine the same according to law and
equity.
Sect. 4. When work as aforesaid shall have been done for a contractor or con-
tractors and not for the owner or owners of saw-logs, it shall be lawful for the owner
or owners to make payment of any moneys due to any labcrer or laborers for such
work, directly to such laborer or laborers; and any payment or payments so made,
shall be a good charge against the contractor or contractors in favor of the owner or
owners, in the settlement of their accounts.
Act 17 May 1871. Purd. 2076.
Sect. 1. All wages that may be due from any person or persons, to any workman or
laborer, for work and labor done in, upon and about the cutting, peeling, skidding and
hauling of saw-logs, squared timber and other lumber, in the county of Centre, shall
be a lien, for a period not exceeding six months, upon all such saw-logs, squared tim-
ber and other lumber, and shall be paid before such lumber shall be removed by the
owner or contractor under such owner ; and said debts shall be first preferred and paid
out of the proceeds of a judicial or assignee’s sale of such lumber.
Sect. 2. For the purpose of enforcing the liens provided for by the first section of
this act, it shall and may be lawful for any such laborer or workman to issue an at-
tachment against the owner of such lumber, or the contractor under such owner, upon
proof, by the affidavit of the plaintiff in said attachment, or his agent or attorney,
that the defendant or defendants are justly indebted to him in the sum claimed; in
which affidavit, the kind of work and labor done, the time when the same was done
1 Thia is an amendment of act 12 June 1879 2 1.
57
898 WAGES.
and the nature thereof, the kind of lumber against which the lien is to be enforced
and where the same is situated, shall be set forth.
Sect. 3. Every such attachment shall be issued out of the court of common pleas of
Centre county, and shall be made returnable on the first return-day of said court next
after the issuing thereof, and shall be served by the sheriff of said county, or by some
general or special deputy by him appointed, by attachment (of) so much of said logs,
-timber or other lumber of said defendant as will be sufficient to pay the amount of
debt demanded in said writ, with costs; and shall deliver to the defendant or de-
fendants a copy of said attachment, with a schedule of the property attached, if said
defendant can be found within the county, and if not found within the county, by
leaving a copy of the same at his or their residence, with an adult member, and if the
defendant does not reside in said county, and cannot be found therein, then by leaving
acopy of said attachment and schedule, with the person in whose possession and care
said lumber may be found.
Sucr. 4. The provisions of the third and fourth sections of the act of assembly, ap-
proved 17th March 1869, entitled “ An act relative to fraudulent debtors,” are hereby
made parts of this act, and made applicable to all proceedings under this act.
Act 12 June 1878. Purd. 2077.
Szct. 1. It is the true intent and meaning of the provisions of the act of assembly,
entitled ‘An act for the better protection of the wages of mechanics, miners, laborers
and others,’’ passed the 9th day of April, Anno Domini 1872, that the several classes
of laborers in said act mentioned shall have a preference over landlords, in all claims
for rent of any mines, manufactories or other real estate, held under lease, where the
lessee or lessees are the parties employing the miners, mechanics, laborers or clerks:
Provided, That any person or persons claiming a preference as above provided, shall
give notice of the nature and amount of his claim to the landlord or his bailiff, before
the actual sale of the property levied upon.
VII. Act 15 Aprit 1845. Purd. 2077.
Scr. 5. The wages of any laborers, or the salary of any person in public or private
employment, shall not be liable to attachment in the hands of the employer.
Acr 8 May 1876. Purd. 2077.
Szcr. 1. All proprietors of hotels, inns, boarding-houses and lodging-houses in this
commonwealth, in addition to the remedies now provided by law, shall have the right
to attach wages due or owing to such persons as may be indebted to them for boarding,
not exceeding the amount of four weeks, and any sum so due may be attached, but
shall not be paid to the defendant until the judgment so had for such amount as may
be due upon such attachment shall be satisfied; and justices of the peace shall have
jurisdiction of attachment in case for such purpose.
VIII. Acr 20 May 1891. Purd. 2077.
Seor. 1. From and after a period of two months subsequent to the date of the pas-
sage of this act, every individual, firm, association or corporation employing wage-
workers, skilled or ordinary, laborers engaged at manual or clerical work, in the
business of mining or manufacturing, or any other employés, shall make payment in
lawful money of the United States to the said employés, laborers and wage-workers,
or to their authorized representatives; the first payment to be made between the first
and fifteenth, and the second payment between the fifteenth and thirtieth of each
month, the full net amount of wages or earnings due said employés, laborers and
wage-workers upon the first and fifteenth instant of each and every month wherein
such payments are made. And in case any individual, firm, corporation or associa-
WARRANT AND CAPIAS, 899
tion or other employer, shall refuse to make payment when demanded, upon the dates
herein set forth, to wage-workers, laborers or other employés employed by or with the
authority of such individual, firm, corporation or association or other employer, the
said individual, the members of the firm, the directors, officers and superintendents or
managers of said corporation and assvciations, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and
upon conviction shall be sentenced to pay a fine not to exceed two hundred dollars.
Secr. 2. No assignment of future wages payable semi-monthly, under the provisions
of this act, shall be valid, nor shall any agreement be valid that relieves the said firms,
individuals, corporations or associations from the obligation to pay semi-monthly, and
in the lawful money of the United States.
Scr. 3. It is hereby made the duty of the factory inspector and his deputies to
bring actions in the name of the commonwealth, against every individual, firm, corpo-
ration and association violating the provisions of this law, upon the request of any
citizen of this commonwealth. Upon his failure to do so, any citizen of this common-
wealth is hereby authorized to do so in the name of the commonwealth.
Sect. 4. All laws or parts of laws inconsistent with the provisions of this act be and
the same are hereby repealed.
’
CAarrant or Capias.
I. Form of a civil warrant or capias. III. Of the bail to be taken by the constable and
IL. Of the service of a warrant, and the consta- his assignment of it.
ble’s return.
I. CIVIL WARRANT OR CAPIAS.
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ss.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
To the Constable of Fifth ward, or to the next constable of the said city, most convenient
to the defendant, greeting :
You are hereby commanded to take the body of [A. B.] if [he] be found in the said
city, and bring [him] before [J. B.], one of our magistrates of the said city, forthwith, on
the service hereof, to answer [B. D.] in a plea of debt, for a penalty not exceeding one
hundred dollars. Witness the said J. B., at Philadelphia, who hath hereunto set his
hand and seal, the |tenth] day of [July], in the year of our Lord one thousand eight
hundred and eighty. J. B., Magistrate. [eeate|
This form may be made to answer in cases of ¢trover and conversion, and in
trespass, by making on it, to the letter, the same alterations which have been made
to render the form of a summons for debt available in similar cases.’
The return of the constable on a warrant can be no other than bringing the
defendant before the justice, returning that he has taken bail for his appearance,
or that he has not been able, after diligent search and inquiry, to find the defendant.
Whatever may be his return, he should endorse it on the warrant, subscribe it with
his name, and date it.
II. OF THE SERVICE OF A CIVIL WARRANT.
When the constable arrests the defendant, he is to take him ‘‘ forthwith ;” that
is, without any unnecessary delay—“ before the justice” who issued the warrant.
A civil warrant must not be served on a Sunday; nor may the constable, on any
day, to serve a civil warrant, break open an outer door for the purpose of arresting
the defendant ; but if he finds the outer door open, and is certain the defendant is
in the house, he may break open the inner door to arrest him. In the eye of the '
law, the defendant is arrested so soon as the officer, who has the process, shall touch
the body of the defendant. If, after arrest, the defendant shall break away to escape,
1 See title “Summons for Debt,” &c.
900 WARRANT OR CAPIAS.
the officer is authorized to break open outer, as well as inner doors, to take him.
When the constable brings his prisoner before the justice, he should return the
warrant indorsed—* I herewith present the body of the defendant.” If the defend-
ant shall have been arrested and given bail, the constable may return his warrant
indorsed—“ I arrested the defendant and discharged him on bail, to appear at the
justice’s office on the sixth of July, inst., at 9 o’clock, a. mM.” If the constable
have been unable to find the defendant, he may indorse the writ—‘‘ I have been
unable to find the within-named defendant.’’ On this, as on all other occasions,
when he returns process, it is the duty of the constable to subscribe his name as
constable, and to date his return.
III. When the constable does take bail, he should take it in the words of the act
of 1810, to wit:
“We, A. B. and C. D., are held and firmly bound unto E. F., constable of G-——, or
order, in the sum of $—, on condition that the said A. B. shall be and appear before
G. H., Esq., a justice of the peace in the said township of ——, on the day of —,
to answer in a plea ——. Witness our hands, the —— day of ——.
”
If the bail for the appearance so taken by the constable be insufficient, the
constable is liable therefor, as sheriffs are, to the plaintiff or plaintiffs named
in the warrant, notwithstanding it may have been assigned to the plaintiff by
the constable. It may be well, to save time, for the constable to appoint an
hour in the bail-bond, as well as a day, at which time the defendant shall appear
at the office of the justice. If the bail-bond be assigned to the plaintiff, it may
be done in the following manner:
“J, A. B., constable of —— township [ward or district], do hereby assign to C. D.,
the plaintiff named in the annexed warrant, all my right, title and interest, in the within
obligation, for value received.
Sealed and delivered in the presence of } A. C., Const. [szau.]”
G. H. and W. M.
If, when the defendant is brought before the justice on a warrant, he satisfy the
latter that he is a freeholder, he should be liberated. The plaintiff may then
proceed by summons. If the defendant claim to be a freeholder, yet be unable
to satisfy the justice of the fact, and give bail for his appearance, at a time to
which the case may be adjourned, he should be liberated. If, when the parties
meet, the defendant satisfy the justice that he is a freeholder, he should be allowed
his privilege, and if sued, be sued by a summons. He should, however, be
allowed sufficient time to return home before any summons be served on him. If
he should not be so permitted, the intention of the legislature would be frustrated
and set at naught. ‘The establishment of his right of exemption would only act
as a trap to hold him, while his privilege should be violated and process served
upon him, which would render the privilege of little or no value.
Since the passage of the act of 1842, to abolish imprisonment for debt, no
warrant of arrest can be issued by a justice of the peace, in a civil action, except
in cases of trover or trespass; or in cases within the exception in the act of 1842,
viz., where it is proved by affidavit, to the satisfaction of the justice, that the
plaintiff's demand is for the recovery of money collected by a public officer, or for
official misconduct.
1 See title “Arrest for Debt.”
[ 901 J
Tleiqghts and Measures.
Act 11 Apri 1850. Purd. 2090.
Sxor. 8. Whenever any description of manufactured goods, commonly called dry
goods or groceries, shall be sold by the piece, in packages, or by weight, and the
said pieces or packages shall be marked or represented to contain a certain num-
ber of yards, pounds or ounces, and the same shall be sold as containing that number
or weight, when in fact the said pieces or packages shall contain a less number of
yards, or pounds, or ounces, than so represented, the seller or manufacturer thereof
shall forfeit and pay to the purchasers a sum equal to double the value of the quantity
or weight found to be deficient, to be recovered by action of debt in any court of
saw, or before any alderman or justice of the peace in this commonwealth, in the
same manner that debts of like amount are now by law recoverable.
Act 5 June 1883. Purd. 2090.
Szor. 1. Any person or persons who shall wilfully use and sell by false beams,
scales, weights and measures, any article, merchandise, commodity or thing, shall
be guilty of a misdemeanor, and on being convicted thereof, shall be sentenced to
pay a fine not exceeding two hundred dollars, and to undergo an imprisonment not
exceeding three months, or both or either, at the discretion of the court.
Gilly Animals.
Act 15 May 1887. Purd. 2100.
Srct. 1. For the benefit of agriculture and the protection of game within this com-
monwealth, there is hereby established the following provision for the destruction of
certain noxious animals, to be paid by the respective counties in which the same are.
slain, namely: For every wolf, ten dollars; for every wildcat, two dollars; for every
red or gray fox, one dollar; for every mink, twenty-five cents."
Sror. 2. It shall be the duty of any person, having killed any of the animals men-
tioned in the first section of this act, who is desirous of availing himself of the premiums
therein provided, to produce such slain animal before any magistrate, alderman or
justice of the peace of the county, in which the same was killed, and make affidavit
of the time and place of killing the same: Provided, That the pelt, if entire from the
tip of the nose of any such animal, may be produced in lieu of such animal, when so
preferred ; and upon the reception of any such animal, or pelt, it shall be the duty of
the said officer, in the presence of said person killing such animal and one elector of
the county, to cut off the ears of such animal, and in the presence of said person,
burn the same. . :
Sxcr. 3. Upon the destruction of such ears, the said officer shall give to the person
producing such animal or pelt, a certificate of compliance with the provisions of this
act, directed to the commissioners of the county in which such animal was slain, which
certificate shall contain the following facts: The kind of animal and when, where and
by whom killed, and the date by whom and in the presence of what elector the ears of
such animal was destroyed ; and, upon the production of such certificate, the said
commissioners shall give an order upon the county treasurer for the payment of the
premium or premiums provided by this act ; and it shall be the further duty of the
said officer, taking the affidavit provided for in the second section of this act, to file
the same forthwith, or cause the same to be filed, in the office of the commissioners of
the county; and upon filing the same, the said officer shall receive from the county
stock the sum of twenty-five cents in full compensation for all his services under this act.
180 amended by act 25 April 1889.
902 WITNESSES.
Sect. 4. If any person shall wilfully and fraudulently collect any premium or pre-
miums provided in this act, or shall aid, abet or assist in any official capacity, or other-
wise, in the same, he, she or they shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon convic-
tion thereof, they shall be sentenced to pay a fine of not exceeding five hundred dollars
and undergo an imprisonment in the county jail of the proper county not exceeding
one year, both or either, at the discretion of the court. .
Szcr. 5. The act of assembly, entitled ‘An act for the destruction of wolves, wild-
cats, foxes, minks, hawks, weasels and owls in this commonwealth,” approved the
twenty-third day of June, Anno Domini one thousand eight hundred and eighty-five,
and all other acts inconsistent herewith, be and the same are hereby repealed.
Gelitnesses.
Act 31 Marca 1860. Purd. 543.
Sect. 11. If any person shall unlawfully dissuade, hinder, prevent or attempt to
dissuade, hinder or prevent any witness from attending and testifying, who may have
been required to attend and testify, either before any committee of the legislature of
this state, or before any civil or criminal court, judge, justice or other judicial tribunal
thereof, by virtue of any writ of subpena or other legal process, or who may have
been recognized to attend as a witness on behalf of the commonwealth or of any
defendant, before any court having jurisdiction, to testify in any case depending or
about to be tried in such court, any person so offending shall be guilty of a misde-
meanor, and being thereof convicted, shall be sentenced to pay a fine not exceeding
five hundred dollars, and undergo an imprisonment not exceeding one year.
Act 24 Frpruary 1870. Purd. 543.
Srcr.1. If any person, who shall have been required by virtue of any writ of
subpeena or other legal process, to attend and testit'y in any prosecution for forgery,
perjury or felony before any criminal court, judge, justice or other judicial tribunal in
this commonwealth, or who may have been recognized or held to bail to attend as a
witness on behalf of the commonwealth or defendant, before any court having juris-
diction, to testify in any prosecution as aforesaid, shall, unlawfully and wilfully, from
this commonwealth, or from the jurisdiction of such court, and with intent to defeat
the ends of public justice, [shall] abscond, elope or conceal himself, and refuse to
appear as required by said swbpcena or other legal process or recognisance of bail, shall
be guilty of a misdemeanor, and being thereof convicted, shall be sentenced to pay a
fine not exceeding two thousand dollars, or undergo an imprisonment not exceeding
two years, or both or either, at the discretion of the court.
Act 14 Marcu 1872. Purd. 543.
Sxcr. 1. Any person or persons who shall wilfully neglect or refuse to appear and
testify before any committee of either branch of the legislature of this state, or before
any joint committee thereof, after he, she or they shall have been duly served with a
subpoena to so appear, and any person or persons who is, or shall be in contempt, by
reason of any such neglect or refusal so to appear and testify, or either, shall be held
and deemed to be guilty of a misdemeanor, and on conviction thereof, shall be punished
by imprisonment not exceeding six months, and by fine not exceeding one thousand
dollars, or either, at the discretion of the courts trying the same.
Act 31 Marcu 1860. Purd. 543.
Srct. 56. No witness in any case who enters his or her recognizance, in such sum as
the magistrate may demand, to appear and testify in such prosecutions as require his
testimony, shall be committed to prison by the judge, alderman or magistrate before
whom any criminal charge may be preferred: Provided, however, That in all cases
triable in the oyer and terminer, where a positive oath is made, reduced to writing and
signed by the deponent, setting forth sufficient reasons or facts to induce the firm belief
on the part of the judge, magistrate or alderman, that any witness will abscond, elope
or refuse to appear upon the trial, that then and in such case, the judge, magistrate or
alderman may exact bail of said witness to testify.
APPENDIX.
CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE.
L Proceedings to detect the commission of
crimes.
IL. Indictments and pleadings.
III. Courts of criminal jurisdiction.
IV. Change of venue.
V. Of the trial.
VI. Of costs.
VII. General provisions.
I. PRocEEprines To DETECT THE COMMISSION OF CRIMES.
1, THE judges of the supreme court, of the court of oyer and terminer and jail
delivery, of the courts of quarter sessions, or any of them, shall and may direct
their writs and precepts to the sheriffs and coroners of the several counties within
this commonwealth, when need shall be, to take persons indicted for felonies, or
other offences, before them, who may dwell, remove or be received into another
county; and it shall and may be lawful to and for the said judges, or any of them,
to issue subpenas into any county in the commonwealth, for summoning and bring-
ing any person to give evidence in any matter or cause before them, or any of them,
and to compel obedience to such writs, precepts or subpeenas, by attachment or other-
wise, and under such pains and penalties as other writs or subpenas are or ought
by law to be granted and awarded; and that it shall be lawful for said judges, or
any of them, if they see fit to direct such writ, precept, summons, subpeena or attach-
ments, to be executed by the sheriff of the county in which the same is awarded,
which said writ, precept, summons or subpena shall be the sufficient warrant of
such sheriff for executing the same throughout this commonwealth, as fully and
effectually as if directed to, and executed by, the sheriff of the proper county
where issued: Provided, That the reasonable expenses of exécuting such process,
when issued on behalf of the commonwealth, shall be paid out of the funds of the
county where issued; and the expenses of removing any person charged with hav-
ing committed an offence in one county into another county, or of transporting any
person charged with having committed any offence in this state from another state
into this state for trial, or for conveying any person, after conviction, to the peniten-
tiary, shall be paid out of the treasury of the county where the offence is charged
to have been committed.
2. Where any person charged with having committed any felony, in any city or
county of this commonwealth, shall go or escape into any other county thereof, it
‘shall and may be lawful for the president, or any judge of the court of common
pleas in the county where the said person may be found, to issue his warrant,
authorizing and requiring the sheriff of the said county, to take the said person
and conduct him to the proper county, where the said felony is alleged to have been
committed, the expenses of which shall be paid to the said sheriff by the county
to which the said person is conducted,?
charged with having committed a misdemeanor
1 Act 31 March 1860 3 1. Purd. 545. The
county is not liable for the expenses incurred in
an unsuccessful attempt to arrest a fugitive from
justice, who has taken refuge in another state.
32 Penn. St. 540.
2 Act 31 March 1860 2 2. Purd. 545. This sec-.
tion does not extend to misdemeanors; a fugitive
in another county can only be arrested under
the provisions of the succeeding section. 1 Gr.
218, On habeas corpus, the only questions that
can be raised are, as to the identity of the pris-
oner, and the regularity of the process. 11
Phila. 386.
903
904 CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE.
3. In case any person against whom a warrant may be issued by avy indee
alderman of any city, or justice of the peace of any county, in this eee a
for any offence there committed, shall escape, go into, reside or be in any ot o a
or county, out of the jurisdiction of the judge, alderman, justice or ‘eaeaee a : @
city or county granting such warrant as aforesaid, it shall and may be la a ae
and it is hereby declared to be the duty of any alderman, justice or justices 0 :
city or county where such person shall escape, go into, reside or be, med prOo
being made, upon oath or affirmation, of the handwriting of the judge, alderman,
justice or justices granting such warrant, to indorse his or their name or names on
such warraat, which shall be sufficient authority to the person or persons bring-
ing such warrant, and to all other persons to whom such warrant was originally
directed, to execute the same in such other city or county, out of the jurisdiction of
the alderman, justice or justices, granting such warrant as aforesaid, and to appre-
hend and carry such offender before the alderman, justice or justices who indorsed
such warrant, or some other alderman, justice or justices of such other city and
county where such warrant was indorsed. And in case the offence for which such
offender shall be so apprehended, shall be bailable in law by an alderman or justice
of the peace, and such offender shall be willing and ready to give bail for his
appearance at the next court of general jail delivery or quarter sessions, to be held
in and for the city and county where the offence was committed, such alderman,
justice or justices shall and may take such bail for his appearance, in the same
manner as the alderman or justice of the peace of the proper city or county might
have done; and the said alderman, justice or justices of the peace of such other city
or county so taking bail, shall deliver or transmit such recognisance and other
proceeding to the clerk of the court of general jail delivery or quarter sessions,
where such offender is required to appear by virtue of such recognisance ; and such
recognisance and other proceedings shall be as good and effectual in law as if the
same had been entered into, taken or acknowledged in the proper county where
the offence was committed, and the same proceedings shall be had therein. And in
case the offence for which such offender shall be apprehended in any other city or
county, shall not be bailable in law by an alderman or justice of the peace, or such
offender shall not give bail for his appearance at the proper court having cognisance
of his crime, to the satisfaction of the alderman or justice before whom he shall be
brought, then the constable or other person so apprehending such offender, shall
carry and convey him before one of the aldermen or justices of the peace of the
proper city or county where such offence was committed, there to be dealt with
according to law.!
4. No action of trespass or false imprisonment, or information or indictment, shal]
be brought, sued, commenced, exhibited or prosecuted by any person against the
alderman, justice or justices, who shall indorse such warrant, for or by reason of his
or their indorsing the same, but such person shall be at liberty to bring or prose-
cute his or their action or suit against the alderman or justice who originally granted
the warrant.?
5. When any person shall be accused before a magistrate, upon oath or affirma-
tion, of the crime of burglary, robbery or larceny, and the said magistrate shall have
issued his warrant to apprehend such person or persons, or to search for such goods
as have been described, on oath or affirmation, to have been stolen goods, if any
shall be found in the custody or possession of such person or persons, or in the cus-
tody or possession of any other person or persons, for his, her or their use, and there
1s probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, to suspect that other goods,
which may be discovered on such search, are stolen, it shall and may be lawful for
the said magistrate to direct the said goods to be seized, and to secure the same in
his own custody, unless the person in whose possession the same were found shall
give sufficient surety to produce the same at the time of his or her trial. And the
said magistrate shall forthwith cause an inventory to be taken of the said goods,
and shall file the same with the clerk of that court in which the accused person is
intended to be prosecuted, and shall give public notice in the newspapers, or other-
1 Act 31 March 1860 2 3. Purd. 545. A war- issued, will not justify the detention of the of-
rant issued by a justice of the peace in one fender in the jail of the county where the war-
county, and indorsed by a justice of another rant was indorsed. 1 Gr. 218.
county, charging a misdemeanor to have been 2 Act 31 March 1860 34. Purd. 546.
committed in the county whence the warrant
CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. 905
t
wise by advertising the same in three or more public places in the city or county
where the offence is charged to have been committed, before the time of trial, noting
in such advertisement the said inventory, the pergon charged and time of trial.
And if, on such trial, the accused party shall be acquitted, and no other claimant
shall appear or suit be commenced, then, at the expiration of three months, such
goods shall be delivered to the party accused, and he, she or they shall be dis-
charged, and the county be liable to the costs of prosecution; but if he be convicted
of larceny only, and, after restitution made to the owner and the sentence of the
court being fully complied with, shall claim a right in the residue of the said goods,
and no other shall appear or claim the said goods, or any part of them, then it shall
be lawful, notwithstanding the claim of the said party accused, to detain such goods
for the term of nine months, to the end that all persons having any claim thereto
may have full opportunity to come, and to the satisfaction of the court, prove their
property in them; on which proof, the said owner or owners, respectively, shall
receive the said goods, or the value thereof, if from their perishable nature it
shall have been found necessary to make sale thereof, upon paying the reasonable
charges incurred by the securing the said goods and establishing their property in
the same; but if no such claim shall be brought and duly supported, then the
person so convicted shall be entitled to the remainder of the said goods, or the value
thereof, in case the same shall have been sold agreeably to the original inventory.
But if, upon an attainder of burglary or robbery, the court shall, after due inquiry,
be of opinion, that the said goods were not the property of such burglar or robber,
they shall be delivered, together with a certified copy of the said inventory, to the
commissioners of the county, who shall indorse a receipt therefor on the original
inventory, register the said inventory in a book, and also cause the same to be
publicly advertised, giving notice to all persons claiming the said goods to prove
their property therein to the said commissioners; and unless such proof shall be made
within three months from the date of such advertisement, the said goods shall be
publicly sold, and the net moneys arising from such sale shall be paid into the
county treasury for the use of the commonwealth: Provided always, That if any
claimant shall appear within one year, and prove his or her property in the said
goods to the satisfaction of the commissioners, or in the case of dispute, shall obtain
the verdict of a jury in favor of such claim, the said claimant shall be entitled to
recover, and receive from the said commissioners or treasurer, the net amount of the
moneys paid as aforesaid into the hands of the said commissioners, or by them paid
into the treasury of this commonwealth?
6. If any person shall threaten the person of another to wound, kill or destroy
him, or to do him any harm in person or estate, and the person threatened shall
appear before a justice of the peace, and attest, on oath or affirmation, that he
believes that by such threatening he is in danger of being hurt in body or estate,
auch person so threatening as aforesaid, shall be bound over, with one sufficient
surety, to appear at the next sessions, according to law, and in the mean time to be
of his good behavior, and keep the peace toward all citizens of this commonwealth.
If any person, not being an officer on duty in the military or naval service of the
state or of the United States, shall go armed with a dirk, dagger, sword or pistol, or
other offensive or dangerous weapon, without reasonable cause to fear an assault
or other injury or violence to his family, person or property, he may, on complaint
of any person having reasonable cause to fear a breach of the peace therefrom, be
required to find surety of the peace as aforesaid.’ ; . ce
7. In all cases the party accused, on oath or affirmation, of any crime or misde-
meanor against the laws, shall be admitted to bail by one or more sufficient sureties,
to be taken before any judge, justice, mayor, recorder or alderman where the offence
charged has been committed, except such persons as are precluded from being bailed
by the constitution of this commonwealth : Provided also, That persons accused as
aforesaid, of murder or manslaughter, shall only be admitted to bail by the supreme
than the next term of the court. 2 Pars. 458.
1 Act 31 March 1860 25. Purd. 548.
2 Ibid. 26. Purd. 539. Surety of the peace
is demandable of right by any individual who
will make the necessary oath. 1 Binn. 102 n.
See 1 Ash. 46. 2 Pars. 458. A committing
magistrate has no authority to bind @ person to
keep the peace, or for his good behavior, longer
Surety for good behavior may be ordered by the
court, after the acquittal of a prisoner, in such
sum, and for such length of time, as the public
safety requires. 2 Y. 437. 10 Penn. St. 329.
2 Hayw. 73-4.
906 CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE.
court or one of the judges thereof, or a president or associate law judge of a court
of common pleas: persons accused, as aforesaid, of arson, rape, mayhem, sodomy,
buggery, robbery or burglary, shall only be bailable by the supreme court, the court
of common pleas, or any of the judges thereof, or a mayor or recorder of a city.” —
8. All sureties, mainpernors and bail in criminal cases, whether bound in
recognisances for a particular matter or for all charges whatsoever, shall be entitled
to have a bail-piece, duly certified by the proper officer or person before whom or in
whose office the recognisance of such surety, mainpernors or bail shall be or remain,
and upon such bail-piece, by themselves or their agents, to arrest and detain, and
surrender their principals, with the like effect as in cases of bail in civil actions ;
and such bail-piece shall be a sufficient warrant or authority for the proper sheriff
or jailer to receive the said principal, and have him forthcoming to answer the
matter or matters alleged against him: Provided, That nothing herein contained
shall prevent the person thus arrested and detained from giving new bail or sureties
for his appearance, who shall have the same right of surrender hereinbefore provided.?
9. In all cases where a person shall, on the complaint of another, be bound by
recoguisance to appear, or shall, for want of security, be committed, or shall be
indicted for an assault and battery or other misdemeanor, to the injury and damage
of the party complaining, and not charged to have been done with intens to commit
a felony, or not being an infamous crime, and for which there shal: also be a remedy,
by action, if the party complaining shall appear before the magistrate who may have
taken recognisance or made the commitment, or before the court in which the
indictment shall be, and acknowledge to have received satisfaction for such injury
and damage, it shall be lawful for the magistrate, in his discretion, to discharge the
recognisance which may have been taken for the appearance of the defendant, or in
case of committal, to discharge the prisoner, or for the court also where such pro-
ceeding has been returned to the court, in their discretion, to order a nolle prosequt
to be entered on the indictment, as the case may require, upon payment of ensts:
Provided, That this act shall not extend to any assault and battery, or other mis-
demeanor, committed by or on any officer or minister of justice.*
IL. InDICTMENTS AND PLEADINGS.
10. The foreman of any grand jury, or any member thereof, is hereby authorized
and empowered to administer the requisite oaths or affirmations to any witness whose
name may be marked by the district-attorney on the bill of indictment.‘
11. Every indictment shall be deemed and adjudged sufficient and good in law
which charges the crimes substantially in the language of the act of the assembly
prohibiting the crime, and prescribing the punishment, if any such there be, or, if
at common law, so plainly that the nature of the offence charged may be easily under-
stood by the jury. LKvery objection to any indictment for any formal defect,
apparent on the face thereof, shall be taken by demurrer, or on motion to quash
such indictment, before the jury shall be sworn, and not afterward. And every court
before whom any such objection shall be taken, for any formal defect, may, if it be
thought necessary, cause the indictment to be forthwith amended in such particular,
by the clerk or other officer of the court, and thereupon the trial shall proceed as
if no such defect appeared
12. It shall be lawful for any court of criminal jurisdiction, if such court shall see
1 Act 31 March 186027. Purd. 546. A jus- grand jury, is not pleadable in bar; at most, it
tice may take bail, after commitment for trial, 6 is only ground for a motion to quash. 13 Leg.
W.&S8. 314. 2 Pars. 458. And see7 W. 454. Int. 132.
5 Binn, 512, 165m. 57 n. A recognisance taken 5 Act 31 March 1860 3 11. Purd. 549. A
by a justice, to answer the charge of arson, is
coram non judice, and void. 2 U.§. Law Mag.
316. A prisoner on trial for a capital offence,
cannot be admitted to bail, during the adjourn-
ment between the daily sessions of the court. 7
W. N.C. 486.
2 Act 3] March 1860 38. Purd. 547. The
surety is not entitled to surrender, after a for-
feiture of the recognisance. 2 Wood. 70.
* Act 31 March 1860 29. Purd. 547.
4Tbid. 2 10. Purd. 549. That witnesses,
whose names had not been marked by the dis-
trict-attorney on the bill of indictment, were
sworn and examined by the foreman of the
substantial defect is not cured by this section. 2
Pears. 432, 44 Penn. St. 197. See 27 N. Y.
329. Formal defects must be taken advantage
of, before the jury is sworn. 44 Penn. St. 197.
11 Phila, 430. Afterwards, the indictment can-
not be quashed, or the judgment arrested. 50
Penn. St. 546. This clause does not prevent the
defendant from demurring. 6 Phila. 281. And
see 2 Brewst. 568. As to what defects are
amendable, see 2 Brewst. 566, 567. 3 Ibid.
249,422, 1 Leg. Gaz. R. 455. 15 Phila. 376.
3 Law Times (N.§.) 126. 78 Penn. St. 496. 14
W.N. ©. 289.
CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. 907
fit to do so, to cause the indictment for any offence whatever, when any variance or
variances shall appear between any matter in writing or in print, produced in evi-
dence, and the recital or setting forth thereof in the indictment whereon the trial is
pending, to be forthwith amended in such particular or particulars, by some officer
of the court ; and after such amendment, the trial shall proceed in the same manner,
in all respects, as if no such variance or variances had appeared! ~
13. If, on the trial of any indictment for felony or misdemeanor, there shall appear
to be any variance between the statement of such indictment and the evidence
offered in proof thereof, in the name of any place mentioned or described in any
such indictment ; or in the name or description of any person or persons or body
politic or corporation therein stated, or alleged to be the owner or owners of any
property, real or personal, which shall form the subject of any offence charged
therein; or the name or description of any person or persons, body politic or corpo-
rate therein stated or alleged to be injured or damaged, or intended to be injured
or damaged, by the commission of such offence; or in the Christian name or sur-
name, or both Christian and surname, or other description whatsoever of any person
or persons whomsoever therein named or described ; or in the name or description of
any matter or thing whatsoever therein named or described; or in the ownership
of any property named or described therein; it shall and may be lawful for the
court before whom the trial shall be had, if it shall consider such variance not
material to the merits of the case, and that the defendant cannot be prejudiced
thereby in his defence upon such merits, to order such indictments to be amended,
according to the proof, by some officer of the court, both in that part of the indict-
ment wherein said variance occurs, and in every other part of the indictment in
which it may become necessary to amend, and after such amendment, the trial
shall proceed in the same manner, in all respects, and with the same consequences,
as if no variance had occurred. And every verdict and judgment which shall be
given after making such amendment, shall be of the same force and effect, in all
respects, as if the indictment had originally been in the same form in which it was
after such amendment was made.”
14. In order to remove the difficulty of describing the ownership of property, in
the case of partners and joint-owners, in any indictment for any felony or misde-
meanor committed on or with respect to any money, chattels, bond, bill, note or
other valuable security or effects belonging to or in the possession of any partners
or joint-owners, it shall be sufficient to aver that the particular subject-matter
on which, or with respect to which, any such offence shall have been committed, to
be the property of some one or more of the partners or joint-owners named in the
indictment, and of other persons being partners or joint-owners with him or them,
without stating any of the names of such other persons; and in any indictment for
any felony or misdemeanor, committed on or with respect to any house or building
whatsoever, belonging to or in the possession of any partners or joint-owners, or for
any felony or misdemeanor committed on or with respect to any property being
in any such house or building, it shall be sufficient to aver that the particular
house or building on or with respect to which, or on or with respect to the property
being in which, any such offence shall have been committed, is the property of some
one or more of the partners or joint-owners named in the indictment, and of other
persons being partners or joint-owners with him or them, without stating any of the
names of such other persons.’ i ;
15. With regard to frauds committed against partners and joint-owners, it shall
be sufficient, in any indictment for any felony or misdemeanor committed with intent
to defraud any partners or joint-owners, to allege that the act was committed with
intent to defraud any one or more of the partners or joint-owners named in the
indictment, and other persons being partners or joint-owners with him or them,
without stating any of the names of such other persons.* . dass
16. With respect to property belonging to counties, cities, townships and districts,
‘it shall be sufficient, in any indictment for any felony or misdemeanor committed on
or with respect to any goods, chattels, farniture, provisions, clothes, tools, utensils,
materials or things whatsoever, which have been or at any time shall be provided
1 Act 31 March 1860 312. Purd. 551. 8 Act 31 March 1860 2 14.
2 Thid. 318. See 79 Penn. St. 308. 4 Ibid. 3 15.
908 CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE.
for or at the expense of any county, city, township or district, to be used in any
court, jail, house of correction, almshouse or other building or place, or in any part
thereof respectively, or to be used for the making, altering or repairing of any
bridge or road, to aver that any such things are the property of such county, city,
township or district. ; : .
17. In any indictment for forgery, uttering, stealing, embezzling, destroying or
concealing, or obtaining by false pretences, any instrument, it shall be sufficient to
describe such instrument by any name or designation by which the same may be
usually known, or by the purport thereof, without setting out any copy or fac-simile
thereof, or otherwise describing the same or the value thereof ?
18. In all other cases whatsoever in which it shall be necessary to make any
averment in any indictment, as to any instrument, whether the same consists wholly
or in part of writing, print or figures, it shall be sufficient to describe such instru-
ment by any name or designation by which the same may be usually known, or by
the purport thereof, and in such manner as to sufficiently identify such instrument,
without setting out any copy or fac-simile of the whole or any part thereof.’ ;
19. It shall be sufficient in any indictment for forging, uttering, offering, dis-
posing of, or putting off, any instrument whatsoever, or for obtaining or attempting
to obtain any property by false pretences, to allege that the defendant did the act
with intent to defraud, without alleging the intent of the defendant to be to defraud
any particular person ; and on the trial of any of the offences in this section men-
tioned, it shall not be necessary to prove any intent on the part of the defendant to
defraud any particular person, but it shall be sufficient to prove that the defendant
did the act charged with an intent to defraud.*
20. In any indictment for murder or manslaughter, it shall not be necessary to
set forth the manner in which or the means by which the death of the deceased
was caused, but it shall be sufficient, in every indictment for murder, to charge that
the defendant did feloniously, wilfully and of his malice aforethought, kill and
murder the deceased; and it shall be sufficient in every indictment for man-
slaughter, to charge that the defendant did feloniously kill and slay the deceased.°
21. In every indictment for wilful and corrupt perjury, it shall be sufficient to set
forth the substance of the offence charged, and in what court, or before whom the
oath or affirmation was taken, averring such court or person or body to have com-
petent authority to administer the same, together with the proper averment, to falsify
the matter wherein the perjury is assigned, without setting forth the information,
indictment, declaration or part of any record or proceeding, other than as aforesaid,
and without setting forth the commission or authority of the court, or person, or
body before whom the perjury was committed ®
22. In every indictment for subornation of perjury, or for corrupt bargaining, or
contracting with others to commit wilful and corrupt perjury, it shall be sufficient
to set forth the substance of the offence, without setting forth the information,
indictment, declaration or part of any record or proceedings, and without setting
forth the commission or authority of the court, or person or body before whom the
perjury was committed, or was agreed or promised to be committed.7
23. In cases arising under the laws of this commonwealth for the restraint of the
horrid practice of duelling, it shall be sufficient to frame an indictment generally,
against either of the principals, for challenging another to fight at deadly weapons,
and notwithstanding it may appear on the trial that the defendant only accepted
the challenge, it shall be sufficient to convict and render him liable to the penalties
of the law; and in like manner, an indictment against the seconds may be framed
generally, for carrying and delivering a challenge, and proof of the mere act of
fighting, and the defendant being present thereat, shall be sufficient to convict
the defendant upon an indictment so framed; and if the duel shall take place within
this commonwealth, the mere fact of fighting shall be full and complete evidence
1 Act 31 March 1860 316. Purd. 551.
2Thid. 917, Purd. 552. See 81 Penn. St. 389.
3 Thid. ¢ 18.
4Tbid, ¢ 19.
have a right ‘to demand the nature and cause
of the accusation against him.” 37 Penn. St,
109. By act 22 April 1871, it is sufficient, in an
indictment for involuntary manslaughter simply
5Tbid. ¢ 20. This section does not conflict
with the constitutional provision contained in
the 9th section of the declaration of rights, that
in all criminal prosecutions the accused shall
to charge that the defendant did unlawfully
kill and slay the deceased. Purd. 552,
® Act 31 March 1860 2 21. Purd. 552.
T Ibid. 3 22.
CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. 909
of tue charges, respectively, of giving or receiving, or of carrying or delivering a
challenge, without other proof thereof. ee
24, In every indictment for feloniously stealing property, it shall be lawful to add
a count for feloniously receiving the said property, knowing it to have been stolen ;
and in any indictment for feloniously receiving property, knowing it to have been
stolen, it shall be lawful to add a count for feloniously stealing said property; and
it shall be lawful for the jury trying the same, to find a verdict of guilty either of
stealing the property or of receiving the same, knowing it to have been stolen ;
and if such indictment shall have been preferred and found against two or more
persons, it shall be lawful for the jury who shall try the same, to find all or any of
the said persons guilty of either stealing the property, or of receiving it, knowing
it to have been stolen, or to find one or more of the said persons guilty of stealing
the property, and the other or others of them guilty of receiving it, knowing it to
have been stolen.’
25. In all cases of felony, the prisoner shall be arraigned, and where any person on
being so arraigned shall plead not guilty, every such person shall be deemed and
taken to put himself upon the inquest or country for trial, without any question
being asked of him how he will be tried, and the inquest shall be charged only to
inquire whether he be guilty or not guilty of the crime charged against him, and
no more. And wherever a person shall be indicted for treason or felony, the jury
impannelled to try such person shall not be charged to inquire concerning his lands,
tenements or goods, nor whether he fled for such treason or felony.*
26. If any prisoner shall, upon his arraignment for any offence with which he is
indicted, stand mute, or not answer directly, or shall peremptorily challenge above
the number of persons summoned as jurors for his trial to which he is by law
entitled, the plea of not guilty shall be entered for him on the record, the super-
numerary challenges shall be disregarded, and the trial shall proceed in the same
manner as if he had pleaded not guilty, and for his trial had put himself upon the
country.*
27. No person shall be required to answer to any indictment for any offence
whatsoever, unless the prosecutor’s name, if any there be, is indorsed thereon ; and
if no person shall avow himself the prosecutor, the court may hear witnesses,
and determine whether there is such a private prosecutor, and if they shall be of
opinion that there is such a prosecutor, then direct his name to be indorsed on such
indictment.§
28. It shall be lawful in cases of embezzlement by clerks, servants or other per-
sons in the employ of another, to charge in the indictment, and proceed against an
offender for any distinct acts of embezzlement, not exceeding three, which may
have been committed by him against the same master or employer, within the space
of six calendar months, from the first to the last of such acts, and in every such
indictment, except where the offence shall relate to a chattel, it shall be sufficient
to allege the embezzlement to be of money, without specifying any particular coin
or valuable security ; and such allegation, so far as regards the description of the
property, shall be sustained, if the offender shall be proved to have embezzled any
amount, although the particular species of coin or valuable security of which
such amount was composed, shall not be proved, or if he shall be proved to have
embezzled any piece of coin or valuable security, or any portion of the value thereof,
although such piece of coin or valuable security may have been delivered to him, in
order that some part of the value thereof should be returned to’ the party delivering
the same, and such part shall have been returned accordingly.°
4 Act 31 March 1860 3 26. Purd. 553. Where
a plea of “not guilty” is entered under this
section, for a prisoner who stands mute; and
there is a trial and judgment, he cannot subse-
1 Act 31 March 1860 2 23. Purd. 552.
2Tbid. 324. The rule against the joinder of
felony and misdemeanor exists now, only where
the offences are repugnant in their nature and
, legal incidents, and the trial and judgment are
‘go incongruous as to deprive the defendant of
some legal advantage, 52 Penn. St. 424. And
see 2 Pitts. 495. 78.&R. 469. Bright. 331.
69 Penn. St. 482. 91 Ibid. 390. 11 Phila, 389.
aw Times (N. 8.) 161.
‘ et 31 enh iBe0 $25. Purd. 553. By act
‘” January 1867,a formal arraignment is only
required in cases triable in the oyer and termi-
ner. Ibid. 480.
quently assign for error any matters appertain-
ing to the precept, venire, drawing, summoning
and returning of jurors, &c.; such case is within
the 53d section of this act. 5 Whart. 67, 78.
5 Act 31 March 1860 2 27. Purd. 549. If
there be no prosecutor, the defendant must
plead without such indorsement. 1 Dall. 5.
6 Act 31 March 1860 3 28. Purd. 553. See 2
Pears. 432.
910 CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE.
29. No district-attorney shall, in any criminal case whatsoever, enter a nolle pro-
sequt, either before or after bill found, without the assent of the proper court 1p
writing first had and obtained.! : ee
30. In any plea of autrefois acquit, or autrefois convict, it shall be sufficient for
any defendant to state, that he has been lawfully convicted or acquitted, as the case
may be, of the offence charged in the indictment.?
III. Courts oF cRIMINAL JURISDICTION.
31. The courts of oyer and terminer and general jail delivery shall have power—
I. To inquire by the oaths and affirmations of good and lawful men of the county,
of all crimes committed or triable in such county. . =
II. To hear, determine and punish the same, and to deliver the jails of such
county of all prisoners therein, according to law. . :
III. To try indictments found in the quarter sessions, and certified by the said
court according to law ; and the said courts shall have exclusive jurisdiction and
power to try and punish all persons charged with any of the crimes herein enume-
rated, which shall be committed within the respective county, to wit: 7
(1.) All persons charged with any murder or manslaughter, or other homicide,
and all persons charged with being accessory to any such crime.
(2.) All persons charged with treason against the commonwealth. —
4 All persons charged with sodomy, buggery, rape or robbery, their counsellors,
aiders and abettors.
(4.) All-persons charged with the crime of voluntarily and maliciously burning
any building, or other thing, made punishable in the same manner as arson.°
(5.) All persons charged with mayhem, or with the crime of cutting off the
tongue, putting out the eye, slitting the nose, cutting off the nose, cutting off a lip,
cutting off or disabling any limb or member of a person, by lying in wait, or with
malice aforethought, and with intent in so doing to maim or disfigure such person,
and their aiders and abettors and counsellors.
(6.) All persons charged with burglary. :
(7.) Every woman who shall be charged with having endeavored privately, either
by herself or the procurement of others, to conceal the death of any issue of her
body, male or female, which, if it were born alive, would be by law a bastard, so that
it may not be known whether such issue was born dead or alive, or whether it was
murdered or not.
(8.) All persons charged with the second or any subsequent offence of receiving,
harboring or concealing any robber, burglar, felon or thief, or with the crime of
receiving or buying any goods or chattels, which shall have been feloniously taken
or stolen, knowing the same to be so taken or stolen.
32. The courts of quarter sessions of the peace shall have jurisdiction and power
within the respective counties—
I. To inquire, by the oaths or affirmations of good and lawful men of the county,
of all crimes, misdemeanors and offences whatsoever, against the laws of this com-
monwealth, which shall be triable in the respective county.®
II. To inquire of, hear, determine and punish, in due form of law, all such crimes
and misdemeanors and offences, whereof exclusive jurisdiction is not given as afore-
said, to the courts of oyer and terminer of such county.
ILI. To take, in the name of the commonwealth, all manner of recognisances and
obligations heretofore taken and allowed to be taken by any justice of the peace ;
and they shall certify such as shall be taken, in relation to any crime not triable
1 Act 31 March 1860 2 29. Purd. 555. See 18
Penn. St. 497. 22 Ibid. 21.
2 Ibid. 3 30. Purd. 553. See 9 Phila, 591.
29 Leg. Int. 333. 104 Penn. St. 339,
5 This has reference to the extent and degree
as well as to the kind of punishment; and there-
fore, whilst the offence described in the 137th
section of the Penal Code, is a felony and tria-
ble only in the oyer and terminer, that de-
scribed in the 138th section, being only a mis-
demeanor, is to be tried in the quarter sessions.
8 Pitts. L. J. 290.
4 Act 31 March 1860 2 31. Purd. 1770. The
offence of receiving stolen goods, with a guilty
knowledge, is triable exclusively in the oyer and
terminer. 12 Phila, 601. The act of 25 May
1878, Pamph. 147, which conferred this jurisdio-
tion on the quarter sessions, was repealed in the
following year, by act 13 May 1879. Pamph, 54,
5 The court will not give in charge to the
grand jury, with a view to a presentment, any
case of ordinary offence, where the remedy by
indictment is adequate, and no urgent necessity
exists for the exercise of this extraordinary
powor. 8 Phila. 478,
CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. 911
therein, to the next court of oyer and terminer having power to take cognisance
thereof.
IV. To continue or discharge the recognisance and obligations of persons bound
to keep the peace, or to be of good behavior, taken as aforesaid, or certified into
such court by any justice of the peace of such county, and to inquire of, hear and
determine, in the manner hitherto practised and allowed, all saridliiate which shall
be found thereon.
V. The courts of quarter sessions shall also have jurisdiction in cases of fines,
penalties or punishments, imposed by any act of assembly, for offences, misde-
ne or delinquencies, except where it shall be otherwise expressly provided and
enacted.
VI. The said courts shall also have and exercise such other jurisdiction and
powers, not herein enumerated, as may have been heretofore given to them by law.
Whenever any indictment shall be found in any court of quarter sessions, for any
crime or offence not triable therein, it shall be the duty of said court to certify the
same into the court of oyerand terminer next to be holden in such county, there to
be heard and determined in due course of law.!
The judges of the county courts of’ oyer and terminer and quarter sessions, and
every of them, shall have power to direct their writs or precepts to all or any of the
sheriffs or other officers of any of the counties, cities, boroughs or towns corporate
of this commonwealth, to arrest and bring before them persons indicted for felonies
and other offences, and amenable to the respective court ; each of said courts shall
have power to award process to levy and recover such fines, forfeitures and amerce-
ments, as shall be imposed, taxed or adjudged by them respectively; each of the
said courts shall have full power and authority to establish such rules for regulating
the practice thereof respectively, and for expediting the determination of suits,
causes and proceedings therein, as in their discretion they shall judge necessary or
proper: Provided, That such rules shall not be inconsistent with the constitution
and laws of this commonwealth ; each of the said courts is empowered to issue writs
of subpena, under their official seal, into any county of this commonwealth, to
summon and bring before the respective court any person to give testimony in any
cause or matter depending before them, under the penalties hitherto appointed and
allowed, in any such case, by the laws of this commonwealth?
33. Every person indicted in any court of quarter sessions, or in any county court
of oyer and terminer and general jail delivery, may remove the indictment, and all
proceedings thereon, or a transcript thereof, into the supreme court, by a writ of
certiorari, or a writ of error, as the case may require: Provided, That no such writ
of certiorari, or writ of error shall issue, or be available, to remove the said indict-
ment and proceedings thereupon, or a transcript thereof, or to stay execution of
the judgment thereupon rendered, unless the same shall be specially allowed by the
supreme court, or one of the justices thereof, upon sufficient cause to it or him
shown, or shall have been sued out, with the consent of the attorney-general ; which
special allowance or consent shall be in writing, and certified on the said writ.*
IV. CHANGE OF VENUE.
34. In criminal prosecutions, the venue may be changed, on application of the
defendant or defendants, in the following cases : ; ;
I. When the judge, who by law is required to try the same, is a near relative of
the prosecutor, or of the defendant, or of the person injured, or has knowledge
of facts which make it necessary that he should be a witness in the case.
II. When, upon the application of a defendant in a felony, it is made to appear
Binn, 403. 4 Ibid. 424. 1 Whart. 525. There
taust be strong ground to believe that if the case
be not removed, some important principle of
law, or the plain justice of the case, will be vio-
lated. 2 Phila. 147. But see 2 Brewst. 379,
1 See 29 Leg. Int. 20.
2 Act 31 March 1860 2 32. Purd. 1769.
SIbid. 3 33. Purd. 795. See 44 Penn. St.
‘131. 3 Gr. 99. The writ of error may be made
returnable in any district. 23 Penn. St. 355. A
writ of error issued without a special allocator
will be quashed. 2S, & R.453. 2 Whart. 113.
So also, if the allocator be obtained before sen-
tence. 168. &R.319. Itis never granted on
mere technical matters, not going to the merits.
2 Penn, St. 244. 38.&R.199. 3 Y. 39.
Wy |
where it is said to be the duty of the court to
allow the writ, in case of doubt as to the accu-
racy of the rulings of the court below. The
commonwealth may sue out acertiorari, without
an allocator. 48 Penn. St.53. See 65 Penn.
St. 51.
912 CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE.
to the satisfaction of the court, that from undue excitement against the prisoner, In
the county where the offence was committed, a fair trial cannot be had, or that
there exists in that county so great a prejudice against him that he cannot obtain
a fair trial, or that there is a combination against him, instigated by influential
persons, by reason of which he cannot obtain a fair trial.
III. When, upon the trial of any criminal case, an unsuccessful effort has been
made to procure and impannel a jury for the trial of the defendant, and it shall be
made to appear to the court, by the written affidavit of some credible witness, that
a fair trial cannot be had. :
IV. When, upon a second trial of any felonious homicide, the evidence on the
former trial thereof shall have been published within the county in which the
same is being tried, and the regular panel of jurors shall be exhausted without
obtaining a jury.) . ;
35. All applications for changes of venue shall be made to the court in which
the indictment shall be pending, in such manner as the said court shall direct,
and before the jury shall be sworn therein ; and if the said court shall be satisfied
of the propriety of such change of venue, and that the causes assigned therefor
are true, and are within the provisions of the first section of this act, it shall be
ordered that the venue thereof shall be changed to some adjoining or convenient
county, where the causes alleged for a change do not exist.?
36. When an order for a change of venue shall be made, the clerk of the court
shall make out a full and complete transcript of the record and proceedings in
said cause, and transmit the same, together with the indictment and all other papers
on file, to the clerk of the court to which the venue is changed, which transcript
shall be entered on the minutes of said court; and the trial of said case shall be
conducted in the court to which it shall be removed, in all respects as if the indict-
ment had been found in the county to which the venue is changed. And the costs
accruing from a change of venue, shall be paid by the county in which the offence
was committed.®
37. When the court has ordered a change of venue, it shall require the accused,
if the offence is bailable, to enter into a recognisance, with good and sufficient
sureties, to be approved by the court or judge, in such sum as the court may direct,
conditioned for his appearance in the court to which the venue is changed, at the
first day of the next term thereof, and to abide the order of such court; and in
default of such recognisanee, or if the offence be not bailable, a warrant shall be
assued, directed to the sheriff, commanding him to safely convey the prisoner.to the
jail of the county where he is to be tried, there to be safely kept by the jailer
thereof, until discharged by due course of law; and the court shall bind the wit-
nesses on the part of the commonwealth to appear before the court in which the
prisoner is to be tried.‘
V. OF THE TRIAL.
38. No person who may hereafter be arraigned on any indictment, and who shall
be bound by recognisance to appear and abide by the judgment of the court, shall be
placed within the prisoner’s bar to plead to such indictment, or be confined therein
during his trial; and all persons shall have an opportunity of a full and free com-
munication with their counsel.®
_ 39. Hvery person indicted for treason shall have a copy of the indictment and a
list of the jury and the witnesses to be produced on the trial for proving such in-
dictment, mentioning the names and places of abode of such jurors and witnesses,
delivered to him three whole days before the trial.®.
40. On the trial of any indictment for treason or misprision of treason, murder,
manslaughter, concealing the death of a bastard child, rape, robbery, burglary,
sodomy, malicious maiming and arson, the accused shall be at liberty to challenge,
: Act 18 March 1875 21, Purd. 556. be furnished to the prisoner. 2 Dall. 342. As
: Ibid. @ 2. to the caption of an indictment, see Add. 156.
° Te 5 - 2 Pears. 450. The word “trial” in this seotion
id. 3 4, means the trying of the cause by the jury, and
5 Act 31 March 1860 3 34, Purd. 557. not the arraignment and plonding pra natobnts
6 Ibid. 3 35, Purd. 549, The caption is a to such trial by the jury. 4 Mass. 232,
portion of the indictment, and a copy of it must
Bey
CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. 913
peremptorily, twenty of the jurors, and on the trial of all other indictments the
accused shall be at liberty to challenge, peremptorily, four of the jurors?
41. The commonwealth shall have the right, in all cases, to challenge peremp-
torily, four persons, and every peremptory challenge beyond the number allowed by
law in any of the said cases, shall be entirely void, and the trial of such person shall
roceed as if no such challenge had been made.?
42, All challenges in criminal proceedings shall be conducted as follows, to wit:
the commonwealth shall challenge one person, and then the defendant shall chal-
lenge one person, and so alternately, until all the challenges shall be made; but if
the commonwealth shall refuse to make any challenge, the defendant shall never-
theless, have the right to challenge the full number allowed him by law.
43. When a challenge for a cause assigned shall be made in any criminal pro-
ceeding, the truth of such cause shall be inquired of and determined by the court.‘
_ 44. In all cases in which two or more persons are jointly indicted for any offence
it shall be in the discretion of the court to try them jointly or severally, except that in
cases of felonious homicide, the parties Shared shall have the right to demand
_ Separate trials; and in all cases of joint trials, the accused shall have the right to
the same number of peremptory challenges to which either would be entitled if
separately tried, and no more.
45, All courts of criminal jurisdiction of this commonwealth shall be,and are
hereby authorized and required, when occasion shall render the same necessary, to
order a tales de circumstantibus, either for the grand or petit jury, and all talesmen
shall be liable to the same challenges, fines and penalties as the principal jurors :
Provided, That nothing herein contained shall repeal or alter the provisions of an
act passed the 20th day of April 1858, entitled “(an act establishing a mode of
drawing and selecting jurors in and for the city and county of Philadelphia.’’
46. No alien shall, in any criminal case whatsoever, be entitled to a jury de
medietate lingue, or partly of strangers.”
47. The trial of all treason against, the commonwealth, committed out of the
jurisdiction of the state, shall be in the county where the offender is apprehended,
or into which he shall first be brought.®
48. If any person shall become an accessory before the fact, to any felony, whether
the same be a felony at common law, or by virtue of any act of assembly now in
force or hereafter to be in force, such person may be indicted, tried, convicted and
punished in all respects as if he were a principal felon.’
49. If any person shall become an accessory after the fact, to any felony, whether
1 Act 31 March 1860 336. Purd. 554, This he is atenant of one of the parties. 8 W. 304,
provision is not in conflict with the clause in
the constitution, which provides “that trial by
jury shall be as heretofore, and the right there-
of shall remain inviolate.” 37 Penn. St.45. 40
Ibid. 462. The commonwealth need not show
cause of challenge, until the panel is exhausted.
37 Penn: St. 45. 40 Ibid. 462. 7 W.585, 3
Brewst. 402. 29 Leg. Int. 150. And that, as
well in cases of misdemeanor or of felony. 100
Penn. St. 317. Ibid. 324.
2 Act 31 March 1860337. Purd. 554. In
cases of misdemeanor, if the commonwealth has
four times passed her right to challenge, and the
defendant has exhausted all his challenges, the
commonwealth cannot challenge; it is otherwise
in felonies. 2 Brewst. 490. If the common-
wealth withdraw‘a challenge, the prisoner can-
not cross-examine the juror; he must challenge
for himself, and assign his reasons; and if the
defendant do not withdraw his challenge, the
commonwealth may cross-examine. 3 Brewst.247.
8 Act 31 March 1860 338. Purd. 554, The
power to challenge for cause may be exercised
at any time before the oath is tendered to the
jury. 23 Penn. St. 12. It is good cause of
challenge, that the juror has conscientious seru-
ples on the subject of capital punishment. 178.
& R. 155. Or that he has formed and expressed
an opinion upon the evidence in the cause. 14
8. & R.292. See 2W.& 8.202. 10Cr. 0.0.
452, Or thatthe juror has been subpoenaed as
ty WT RQA Dn thot
a witness hv the neriennaw
Or that he had grossly misbehaved himself on a
former occasion, declaring that he had tried to
acquit any one the judge desired to have con-
victed; and that he was “a Tom Paine man,
and would as lief swear on a spelling-book as on
the Bible.” 23 Penn. St. 12.
4 Act 31 March 1860 339. Purd. 554. See
11 Phila. 430.
5Ibid. 3 40. Purd. 554, Where separate
trials are granted, the court will not control the
discretion of the district attorney as to which of
the defendanis shall be first tried. 36 Penn.St.
305.
6 Act 31 March 1860 341. Purd. 555. The
court may direct a special ventre to issue to two
citizens instead of the sheriff or coroner, when-
ever, in their opinion, the nature of the case re-
quires it. 3 Phila, 219. This does not repeal
so much of the act of 1834 as authorizes the
selection of talesmen, either from the bystanders
or from the body of the county. 30 Leg. Int.
382. Itis an irregularity, to call talesmen, un-
less it appear of record, that the regular panel
was exhausted, and an order for talesmen made ;
but such irregularity, if not objected to, is cured
by the verdict, under the 53d section. 22 Penn.
St. 94.
7 Act 31 March 1860 42.
8 Ibid. 2 43. Purd. 555.
9 Ibid. ¢@ 44. Purd. 557. See 84 Penn. St.
187. 94 Ibid, 290. 11 Phila. 430. 10 L. Bar.
1n7
.
Purd. 554.
914 CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE.
the same be a felony at common law, or by virtue of any act of assembly now
in force, or that may be hereafter in force, he may be indicted and Sonnets as an
accessory after the fact, to the principal felony, together with the principal oer
after the conviction of the principal felon, or may be indicted and convicted of a
substantive felony, whether the principal felon shall or shall not have been pe
ously convicted, or shall or shall not be amenable to justice, and may eee @
punished in like manner as any accessory after the fact to the same fe ony, if con-
victed as an accessory, may be punished; and the offence of such person, pret
indicted, may be inquired of, tried, determined and punished, by any 2 ich
shall have jurisdiction to try the principal felon, in the same manner as if the act
by reason of which such person shall have become accessory, had been committed
at the same place as the principal felony: Provided always, That no person who
shall be once duly tried for any such offence, whether as an accessory after the fact,
or as for a substantive felony, shall be liable to be again indicted or tried for the
same offence.’ :
50. If any person hereafter shall be feloniously stricken, poisoned or receive other
cause of death in one county and die of the same stroke, poisoning or other cause of
death in another county, then an indictment found therefor by jurors of the county
where the person was feloniously stricken, poisoned or received other cause of death,
shall be as good and effectual in law, as well against the principal in such murder as
against the accessory thereto, as if the death had occurred in the same county where
such indictment shall be found; and the proper courts having jurisdiction of the
offence shall proceed upon the same as they might or could do in case such felonious
stroke, poisoning, or other cause of death, and the death itself thereby ensuing, had
been committed and happened all in one and the same county.”
51. Lf aay person shall be feloniously stricken, poisoned or receive other cause of
death within the jurisdiction of this state, and shall die of such stroke, poisoning
or other cause of death at any place out of the jurisdiction of this state, an indict-
ment therefor found by the jurors of the county in which such stroke, poisoning or
other cause of death shall happen as aforesaid, shall be as good and effectual, as
well against the principal in any such murder, as against the accessory thereto,
as if such felonious stroke, poisoning or other cause of death, and the death thereby
ensuing, and the offence of such accessory, had happened in the same county where
such indictment shall be found; and the courts having jurisdiction of the offence
shall proceed upon the same, as well against principal as accessory, as they could
in case such felonious stroke, poisoning or other cause of death, and the death
thereby ensuing, and the offence of such accessory, had both happened in the same
county where such indictment shall be found.®
52. In order to obviate the difficulty of proof as to all offences committed near
the boundaries of counties, in any indictment for felony or misdemeanor committed
on the boundary or boundaries of two or more counties, or within the distance of
five hundred yards of any such boundary or boundaries, it shall be sufficient to
allege that such felony or misdemeanor was committed in any of the said counties ;
and every such felony or misdemeanor shall and may be inquired of, tried, deter-
mined and punished in the county within which the same shall be so alleged to
have been committed, in the same manner as if it had been actually committed
therein.‘
58. In order to obviate the difficulty of proof as to offences committed during
journeys from place to place, in any indictment for felony or misdemeanor com-
mitted on any person or on any property, upon any stage-coach, stage, wagon,
railway-car or other such carriage whatever, employed in any journey, it shall be
sufficient to allege that such felony or misdemeanor was committed within any
county or place through any part whereof such coach, wagon, cart, car or other carriage
shall have passed in the course of the journey during which such felony or misde-
meanor shall have been committed ; and in all cases where the centre or other part
of any highway shall constitute the boundaries of any two counties, it shall be
sufficient to allege that the felony or misdemeanor was committed in either of the
1 Act 31 March 1860 3 45. Purd. 558. 3 Act 31 March 1860 347. Purd. 556;
2Tbid. 246, So amonded by act8 May 1889. 4 Ibid. 948. See 86N. Y¥.77. 56 Ibid, 95.
Purd. 555. See 4 Dall. 416, and note.
CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. 915
said counties through, or adjoining to, or by the boundaries of any part whereof,
such coach, wagon, cart, car or other carriage shall have passed in the course of the
journey during which such felony or misdemeanor shall have been committed ; and
im any indictment for any felony or misdemeanor, committed on any person or on
any property on board any vessel whatsoever, employed in any voyage or journey
on any navigable river, canal or inland navigation, it shall be sufficient to allege
that such felony or misdemeanor was committed in any county or place through
any part whereof such vessel shall have passed in the course of the voyage or
journey during which such felony or misdemeanor shall have been committed ; and
in all cases where the side or bank of any navigable river or creek, canal or inland
navigation, or the centre or other part thereof, shall constitute the boundary of any
two counties, it shall be sufficient to allege that such felony or misdemeanor was
committed in either of the said counties through, or adjoining to, or by the bound-
ary of any part thereof, such vessel shall have passed in the course of the voyage
or journey during which such felony or misdemeanor shall have been committed ;
and every such felony or misdemeanor committed in any of the cases aforesaid, shall
and may be inquired of, tried, determined and punished in the county or place
within which the game shall be so alleged to have been committed, in the same
manner as if it had actually been committed therein.’
54. If on the trial of any person charged with any felony or misdemeanor, it
shall appear to the jury upon the evidence, that the defendant did not complete the
offence charged, but was guilty only of an attempt to commit the same, such person
shall not by reason thereof be entitled to be acquitted, but the jury shall be at
liberty to return, as their verdict, that the defendant is not guilty of the felony or
misdemeanor charged, but is guilty of an attempt to commit the same; and there-
upon such person shall be liable to be punished in the same manner as if he had
been convicted upon an indictment for attempting to commit the particular felony
or misdemeanor charged in the indictment; and no person so tried as herein lastly
mentioned, shall be liable to be afterward prosecuted for an attempt to commit the
felony or misdemeanor for which he was so tried.?
55. If upon the trial of any person for any misdemeanor, it shall appear that the
facts given in evidence amount in law to a felony, such person shall not by reason ©
thereof be entitled to be acquitted of such misdemeanor ; and no person tried for
such misdemeanor shall be liable to be afterwards prosecuted for felony on the same
facts, unless the court before whom such trial may be had shall think fit, in its
discretion, to discharge the jury from giving any verdict upon such trial, and direct
such person to be indicted for felony; in which case such person may be dealt with
in all respects as if he had not been put upon his trial for such misdemeanor.’
56. No person shall be deemed and adjudged an incompetent witness on the trial
of any indictment, for or by reason of such person being entitled, in the event of
the conviction of the defendant, to a restitution of his property feloniously taken,
or the value thereof, or if fraudulently obtained, to a pecuniary remuneration or
compensation therefor, or for or by reason of such witness being liable and subject
to the payment of the costs of prosecution.‘ .
57. No verdict in any criminal court shall be set aside, nor shall any judgment
be arrested or reversed, nor sentence delayed, for any defect or error in the precept
issued from any court, or in the venire issued for the summoning and returning of
jurors, or for any defect or error in drawing, summoning or returning any juror, or
panel of jurors, but a trial, or an agreement to try on the merits, or pleading guilty,
or the general issue, in any case, shall be a waiver of all errors and defects in, or
relative or appertaining to, the said precept, venire, drawing, summoning and
returning of jurors.’
1 Act 31 March 1860 3 49. Purd. 556.
2Tbid. 250. Purd. 558.
3 Ibid. 351. Purd. 559.
4TIbid. 52. Purd. 815.
5Ibid. 3 538. Purd. 559. A trial on the
merits is a waiver of all irregularities and de-
fects in the mode of summoning and returning
the jurors. 29 Penn. St. 429. After a trial, it is
too late to object to mistakes in the process, as
to the Christian and surname of some of the
jurors by whom the verdict was rendered. 22
Penn. St. 94. If a person, not on the panel, be
called and permitted to sit, the irregularity is
cured by this section. 15 Penn. St. 236. But
if a stranger answer to the name of one of the
panel, and is sworn asa juror, it is a mistrial,
and not within the statute, 5 Clark 238. See3
Ibid. 127. If the prisoner stand mute, and the
plea of not guilty be entered by the court, it is
within the act. 5 Whart. 67. See 2 Ash. 90.
916 CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE.
58. [f any person shall be committed for treason or felony, or other indictable
offence, and shall not be indicted and tried some time in the next term, session of
oyer and terminer, general jail delivery, or other court where the offence is properly
cognisable, after such commitment, it shall and may be lawful for the judges or jus-
tices thereof, and they are hereby required on the last day of the term, sessions or
court, to set at liberty the said prisoner upon bail, unless it shall appear to them,
upon oath or affirmation, that the witnesses for the commonwealth, metitioning their
names, could not then be produced; andif such prisoner shall not be indicted and
tried the second term, sessions or court after his or her commitment, unless the delay
happen on the application or with the assent of the defendant, or upon trial, he shall
be acquitted, he shall be discharged from imprisonment: Provided always, That
nothing in this act shall extend to discharge out of prison, any person guilty of, or
charged with treason, felony or other high misdemeanor in any other state, and who
by the constitution of the United States ought to be delivered up to the executive
power of such state, nor any person guilty of, or charged with, a breach or violation
of the laws of nations.’
59. Upon the trial of any indictment for making or passing, and uttering, any false,
forged or counterfeited coin or bank-note, the court may receive in evidence, to
establish either the genuineness or falsity of such coin or note, the oaths or affirma-
tions of witnesses who may, by experience and habit, have become expert in judg-
ing of the genuineness or otherwise, of such coin or paper, and such testimony may
be submitted to the jury, without first requiring proof of the handwriting or the other
tests of genuineness, as the case may be, which have been heretofore required by
law ; and in prosecutions for either of the offences mentioned or described in the
164th, 165th, 166th and 167th sections of the ‘‘ act to consolidate, revise and amend
the penal laws of this commonwealth,” the courts shall not require the common-
wealth to produce the charter of either of said banks, but the jury may find that
fact upon other evidence, under the direction of the court.?
60. No witness in any case who enters his or her recognisance, in such sum as the
magistrate may demand, to appear and testify in such prosecutions as require his
testimony, shall be committed to prison by the judge, alderman or magistrate before
whom any criminal charge may be preferred: Provided, however, That in all cases
triable in the oyer and terminer, where a positive oath is made, reduced to writing
and signed by the deponent, setting forth sufficient reasons or facts to induce the
firm belief on the part of the judge, magistrate or alderman, that any witness will
abscond, elope or refuse to appear upon the trial, that then and in such case
the judge, magistrate or alderman may exact bail of said witness to testify.*
61. Upon the trial of any indictment for murder or voluntary manslaughter, it
shall and may be lawful for the defendant or defendants to except to any decision
of the court upon any point of evidence or law, which exception shall be noted
by the court, and filed of record as in civil cases, and a writ of error to the
Bupreme court may be taken by the defendant or defendants, after conviction and
sentence.*
62. If, during the trial upon any indictment for murder or voluntary manslaughter,
1 Act 31 March 1860 @ 54. Purd. 547. The itself; and therefore, where the array of grand
application must be made to the court in which
the prisoners were indicted. 2 Whart. 502. 3
Y¥. 264. 7W.&8.110. This section only ap-
plies where there has been wilful delay on the
art of the commonwealth. 168. & R. 305. 7
. 366. Not where the trial is delayed by the
prisoner. 3 Y. 266. 168. & R. 304. 2 Whart.
501. 1 Dall. 9. Nor does it apply to a fugitive
from justice, who has been arrested and com-
mitted. 13 Phila, 452. 14 Ibid. 398, A pris-
oner can only claim his discharge on the last
day of the second term after his arrest, when
thore has been a competent and regularly con-
stituted court before whom he could have been
indicted and tried. 29 Penn. St. 129. 11 Phila.
370. The act was designed to prevent wrongful
restraints of liberty growing out of the malice
and procrastination of the prosecutor; but not to
shield a prisoner, in any case, from the conse-
quences of any delay made necessary by the law
jurors was quashed at two successive terms after
the arrest of the prisoner, for informality in se-
lecting and drawing them, he is not entitled to
a discharge. 29 Penn. St. 129. 97 Ibid. 211.
2 Act 31 March 1860 2 55. Purd. 507.
3 Thid. 56. Purd. 543.
‘Thid. ¢ 57, Purd. 796. A bill of exceptions
to the admission or rejection of evidence, on the
trial of one charged by indictment with a orimi-
nal offence, other than murder or voluntary
manslaughter, is not the subject of consideration
on a writ of error, although the bill may have
been sealed by the court below. 2 W. 285. The
prisoner must show that a substantial error was
committed on the trial, in the admission or re-
jection of evidence, by which he has been in-
jured; it is not sufficient, that an abstract or
technioal error has taken place. 29 Penn. St.
429, See 44 Ibid. 386,
CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. 917
the court shall be required by the defendant or defendants to give an opinion upon
any point submitted and stated in writing, it shall be the duty of the court to
answer the same fully, and file the point and answer with the records of the case?
63. No such writ shall be allowed, unless special application be made therefor,
and cause shown, within thirty days after sentence pronounced ; and if the supreme
court be sitting in banc in any district, the application shall be made, and cause shown
there; if the said court be not sitting, application may be made to, and cause
shown before one of the judges of that court, and upon the allowance of such writ,
the said court or judge shall fix a time and place for hearing the said case, which
time shall not be more than thirty days thereafter; if the said court shall be at
that time sitting in banc in any district of the state, the said court or judge, upon
the allowance of any such writ, shall make all such proper orders, touching notice
to the commonwealth, and paper-books, as may be considered necessary.?
64. The writ of error shall issue from the prothonotary’s office of the proper dis-
trict, and all orders, decrees and judgmeuts in the case shall also be entered of record
there ; out the application and final hearing may be made and had before the said
supreme court while sitting in any other district.
65. Upon the affirmance of the supreme court of the judgment in any case,
the same shall be enforced pursuant to the directions of the judgment so affirmed,
and the said court may make any further order requisite for carrying the same into
effect; and if the supreme court shall reverse any judgment, they shall remand
the record, with their opinion, setting forth the causes of reversal, to the proper
court, for further proceedings.‘
VI. OF costs.
66. In all prosecutions, cases of felony excepted, if the bill of indictment shall
be returned ‘‘ ¢gnoramus,” the grand jury returning the same shall decide and
certify on such bill whether the county or the prosecutor shall pay the costs of
prosecution; and in all cases of acquittals by the petit jury on indictments for
the offences aforesaid, the jury trying the same shall determine, by their verdict,
whether the county, or the prosecutor, or the defendant, shall pay the costs,
or whether the same shall be apportioned between the prosecutor and the defend-
ant, and in what proportions ; and the jury, grand or petit, so determining, in case
they direct the prosecutor to pay the costs or any portion thereof, shall name him
in their return or verdict; and whenever the jury shall determine as aforesaid, that:
the prosecutor or defendant shall pay the costs, the court in which the said deter-
mination shall be made shall forthwith pass sentence to that effect, and order him
to be committed to the jail of the county until the costs are paid, unless he give
security to pay the same within ten days.°
1 Act 31 March 1860 358. Purd. 796. The Nor where, on an indictment for felony, a count
supreme court is limited to a review of the fora misdemeanor ig joined. 26 Penn, St. 154.
points so noted and filed of record by the court The statute extends to the case of a defective in-
below. 29 Penn. St.429. 37 Ibid. 108, 50 Ibid. dictment. 4 Binn. 194. 48. & R. 127. 67 Penn.
9. The act does not authorize an exception to St. 203. 1 Wood. 370. And to an acquittal ona
the charge of the court. 1 Pitts. 490. Andthe plea of the statute of limitations. 26 Penn. St.
judge is not bound to geala bill of exceptions 171. But where the indictment charges no legal
unless presented to him for settlement, within offence, the petit jury cannot impose the costs on
the time prescribed by the rules of court. 100 the defendant. 96 Penn, St. 285. The jury can-
Penn. St. 317; 38 Leg. Int. 185. This section not convict one of two defendants, and acquit the
does not require the court to write out its charge other, and direct the latter to pay the costs. 13
to the jury. 1 Pitts. 489. 8. & R. 301. The court may set aside a verdict
2 Act 31 March 1860 3 59. Purd. 796. of acquittal, so far as it imposes costs on the
3 [bid. 3 60. prosecutor. 2 Gr. 66. Ifthe jury acquit the de-
4Ibid. 361. The courts haveno power,when fendant, and say nothing as to the costs, the
passing sentence, to enter arule to reconsider county is not liable. 3 P. & W. 365. And when a
their judgment, and at a subsequent term,to verdict of “ not guilty” is rendered in pursuance
alter the sentence. The wonder is, that such ofaprivate settlement between the parties, with-
power-should ever have been supposed to exist. out evidence or actual trial, the costs cannot be
57 Penn. St. 291. But, it seems, a judgment of imposed onthecounty. 75 Penn. St. 215, Theact
conviction may be set aside, during the term, does not include the costs of a former bill, on
though the defendant have entered upon theterm which judgment was arrested. 26 Penn. St. 171.
of imprisonment imposed. 9 Wall. 38. And the No person can be sentenced to pay costs as prose-
court has power, during the term, to reconsider cutor, unless named by the jury. 7 W. 485. But
the sentence, and impose a severer punishment. where the grand jury ignored a bill for assault
12 Phila. 600. 38 Leg. Int. 185. and battery, and directed the person upon whom
5 Act 31 March 1860 2 62. Purd. 563. If the it was alleged to have been committed, to pay the
act be charged to have been done feloniously, the costs, it was held sufficient, although they omitted
jury have no power over the costs. 6 W. 530. to designate him as prosecutor. Commonwealth
918 CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE.
67. In all prosecutions where the petit jury trying the same shall acquit the getaeath
and shall determine, by the verdict, that the prosecutor shall pay the costs, the defend-
ant’s bill for his subpenas, serving the same, and attendance of his material and neces-
sary witnesses, shall be included in the costs and paid accordingly.
68. The costs of prosecution accruing on all bills of indictments ae
felony, returned “ignoramus”’ by the grand jury, shall be paid by the county; an i e
costs of prosecution accruing on bills of indictment charging a party with felony, shall, i
such party be acquitted by the petit jury on the traverse of the same, be paid by the
county; and in all cases of conviction of any crime, all costs shall be paid by the party
convicted ; but where such party shall have been discharged, according to law, without
payment of costs, the costs of prosecution shall be paid by the county ,; and in cases of
surety of the peace, the costs shall be paid by the prosecutor or the defendant, or jointly
between them, or the county, as the court may direct.? the
69. In all cases where two or more persons have committed an indictable offence, the
names of all concerned (if a prosecution shall be commenced) shall be contained in one
bill of indictment, for which no more costs shall be allowed than if the name of one
person only was contained therein.® : E
70. The costs of prosecution accruing in every case of misdemeanor in any of the courts
of quarter sessions of the peace of this commonwealth shall, on the termination of the
prosecution by the bill of indictment being ignored by the grand jury, or by a verdict of
a traverse jury and sentence of the court, thereon be immediately chargeable to and paid
by the proper county: Provided, That the county shall be liable only for the costs of such
witnesses, as the district attorney shall certify were subpoenaed by his order and were in
attendance and necessary to the trial of the case. : AF,
71. When the record in any criminal case shall have been removed by writ of certiorari
or otherwise to the supreme court for review and shall have been therein disposed of, the
necessary expenses of the district attorney in connection therewith, including a reasonable
compensation for his services to be fixed by the court in addition to the regular fee now
allowed him by law for trying the case in the lower court, shall be paid by the proper
county.
72. The costs of the officers, including the costs of the justice of the peace and con-
stable, and [in] all cases of wife desertion and surety of the peace, shall be chargeable to
and paid by the proper county as soon as the case is disposed of by the order of the
charging a party with
court. ‘
73. It shall be the duty of the district attorney and the county commissioners to use all
due diligence to collect the costs, in every case mentioned in this act, from the party made
liable therefor by the sentence or order of the court, and: to pay the same into the county
treasury.‘
wv. Carr, Q.S., Phila., 23 October 1847. MS. The
act does not apply to persons concerned in prose-
cutions in their official capacity, 2 Gr. 66; and
hence, in a prosecution for keeping a disorderly
house, the jury cannot impose the costs on the con-
stable who made the return. Commonwealth v. Barr,
Q.8., Lancaster, January 1843. MS, 13 L. Bar 59.
1 Act 31 March 1860 3 63. Purd. 564. Seo 2 P.
& W.240. 138. & R. 303. 9 Phila. 623. A ver-
dict of “ not guilty, and county pay costs,” is not
a finality ; there must bea judgment on the verdict,
to render the county liable. 3 Brewst.532. Where
the petit jury acquit the defendant, and apportion
the costs between him and the prosecutor, the de-
fendant’s costs are to be taxed. Act 9 April 1873.
Purd. 490.
2 Act 31 March 1860 3 64. Purd. 564. If the
jury acquit the defendant, and direct the costs of
prosecution to be paid by the county, the latter is
not liable for the attendance of the defendant’s
witnesses, 36 Penn. St. 317, See 34 Ibid. 440.
7 Luz. L. Reg. 191. The county is not liable for
the defendants costs, on an acquittal of a chargo of
felony. 72 Penn. St. 80. The act includes con-
victions for drunkenness and vagrancy, 28 Penn.
St. 173, 29 Ibid. 38, provided the defendants be
sentenced to hard labor, and the commitments fol-
low the sentences as recorded. 36 Penn. St. 349.
45 Ibid. 372. The cise of a prosecutor on a bill re-
turned tgnoramus, is not within the act; nor that
of a defendant acquitted, but ordered to pay the
costs by the petit jury; nor where the prosecutor
is ordered to pay costs on an acquittal. 45. & R.
541. Nor where the case is determined by nolle
prosequi. 128. & R. 94, 18 Penn. St. 493. Or the
indictment is quashed. 3 R. 487. But it extends
to cases where the party may be discharged under
the insolvent laws; or where judgment has been
arrested or reversed on error. 128. & R.95. Or
where the defendant has been pardoned, after con-
viction. 48. & R, 449. 1 Wood. 440. The act
does not include costs of an attachment against a
witness for contempt. 258. & R. 292. Unless the
discharge be a legal one, the county is not liable,
4 Clark 15. See 4 Leg. Gaz. 212.
5 Act 31 March 1860 365. Purd. 565. The act
11 May 1874 (Purd. 564), provides, that the costs
of prosecution accruing on all bills of indictments
charging aparty with felony, ignored by the grand
jury, shall be paid by thecounty; and in all cases
of conviction of any felony, all costs shall be paid
forthwith by the county, unless the party convicted
shall pay the same; and in all cases in which the
county pays the costs, it shall have power to levy
and collect the same from the party convicted, as
costs in similar cases are now collectible, The act
10 April. 1873, Pamph. 640, makes a similar provi-
sion for York county, but including also cases of
surety of the peace; but this does not render the
county liable for costs, in cases of surety of the
ae unless so ordered by the court. 100 Penn,
t.619. Where prosecutor or defendant is ordered
to pay the costs, a jury fee of four dollars is to be
taxed. Purd. 565, But no costs are to be charged
in the dischargo of a prisoner from an unfounded
accusation. Ibid,
4 Act 19 May 1887. Purd. 564,
CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. 919
VII. GENERAL PROVISIONS.
74. In every case in which it shall be given in evidence upon the trial of any person
charged heed crime or misdemeanor, that such person 78 insane at the (a of the
commission of such offence, and he shall be acquitted, the jury shall be required to find
specially whether such person was insane at the time of the commission of such offence,
and to declare whether he was acquitted by them on the ground of such insanity; and if
they shall so find and declare, the court before whom the trial is had shall have power to
order him to be kept in strict custody, in such place and in such manner as to the said
court shall seem fit, at the expense of the county in which the trial is had, so long as
such person shall continue to be of unsound mind.
75. The same proceedings may be had, if any person indicted for an offence shall, upon
arraignment, be found to bea lunatic, by a jury lawfully impannelled for the purpose; or
if, upon the trial of any person so indicted, such person shall appear to the jury, charged
with such indictment, to be a lunatic, the court shall direct such finding to be recorded,
and may proceed as aforesaid.”
76. In every case in which any person charged with any offence shall be brought before
the court to be discharged for want of prosecution, and shall, by the oath or affirmation
of one or more credible persons, appear to be insane, the court shall order the district
attorney to send before the grand jury a written allegation of such insanity, in the nature
of a bill of indictment; and thereupon the said grand jury shall make inquiry into the case,
as in cases of crimes, and make presentment of their finding to said court thereon; and
thereupon the court shall order a jury to be impannelled to try the insanity of such person ;
but before a trial thereof be ordered, the court shall direct notice thereof to be given to the
next of kin of such person, by publication or otherwise, as the case requires; and if the
jury shall find such person to be insane, the like proceedings may be had as aforesaid.®
77. If the kindred or friends of any person who may have been acquitted as aforesaid
on the ground of insanity, or in the default of such, the guardians, overseers or supervisors
of any county, township or place, shall give security in such amount as shall be satisfac-
tory to the court, with condition that such lunatic shall be restrained from the commission
of any offence by seclusion or otherwise, it shall be lawful for the court to make an order
for the enlargement of such lunatic, and his delivery to his kindred or friends, or as the
case may be, to such guardians, overseers or supervisors.*
78. The estate and effects of every such Junatic shall, in all cases, be liable to the county
for the reimbursement of all costs and expenses paid by such county in pursuance of such
order; but if any person acquitted on the grounds of insanity, shall have no estate or effects,
the county, township or place to which such lunatic may be chargeable under the laws of
this commonwealth relating to the support and employment of the poor, shall, after notice
of his detention aforesaid, be liable for all costs and expenses as aforesaid, in like manner
- if he uae become a charge upon any township not liable for his support under the laws
oresaid.
79. In all cases of felony heretofore committed, or which may hereafter be committed,
it shall and may be lawful for any person injured or aggrieved by such felony, to have and
maintain his action against the person or persons guilty of such felony, in like manner as
if the offence committed had not been feloniously done ; and in no case whatever, shall
the action of the party injured, be deemed, taken or adjudged to be merged in the felony,
or in any manner affected thereby.® ;
80. The imprisonment awarded as part of the punishment of any offender, shall not
stop or avoid the awarding or taking out of execution to levy such respective sums re-
covered against them, as such offenders refuse or neglect to pay, when such writs are taken
out, which executions shall be directed to the sheriff or coroner of the proper county, re-
quiring him to levy the sums due upon such recoveries as aforesaid, of the lands and
tenements, goods and chattels of such offenders, returnable to the next term or session of
the court where such conviction was had, which shall be executed accordingly; and the
lands, goods and chattels thereby seized shall be sold and conveyed by the said officers ;
and such sales shall be as available and effectual in Jaw as any other sales of land taken
and sold for the payment of debts, by virtue of writs of execution awarded out of the
courts of common pleas in the respective counties” =
81. Whenever any person shall be sentenced to imprisonment at labor by separate
or solitary confinement, for any period not less than one year, the imprisonment and
Jabor shall be had and performed in the state penitentiary for the proper district:
Provided, That nothing in this section contained shall prevent such person from
1 1 March 1860 3 66. Purd. 1278. In- 2 Act 31 March 1860 3 67, Purd. 1278.
a a dies, sans be affirmatively estab- Poets oe 1860 368. Purd. 1278.
i ; ble doubt as to the prisoner's i | is
patlly Wout arenas, 72 Penn. St. 4i4.> 78 Ibid. ®Ibid. ¢70. See act 14 May 1874. Purd. 1278.
122, 88 Ibid. 291. The presumption of sanity can 6 Ibid. ¢ 71. Purd. 563. :
only be overcome by fairly preponderating evi- TIbid. ¢ 72. Purd. 563. A conveyance made
Dane 100 Penn. St. 573. 83 Ibid. 131. 86 toelude the provisions of this section, would be
Tbid. 260. See 32 Am. L. Reg. 771. fraudulent and void at common law. 5 Binn, 114,
920 CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE.
being senten-ed to imprisonment and labor, by separate or solitary confinement, in
the county prisons now or hereafter authorized by law to receive convicts of a like
description : And provided also, That no convict shall be sentenced by any court of
this commonwealth, to either of the penitentiaries thereof, for any term which shall
expire between the fifteenth of November and the fifteenth of February of any
ear.’
: 82. No person shall be sentenced to imprisonment at labor, by separate or solitary
confinement, for a period of time less than one year, except in the counties where,
in the opinion of the court pronouncing the sentence, suitable prisons have been
erected for such confinement and labor; and all persons sentenced to simple imprison-
ment for any period of time, shall be confined in the county jail where the convic-
tion shall take place: Provied, That in the counties where suitable prisons for
separate or solitary confinement at labor do not exist, and the sentence shall be for less
than one year, simple imprisonment shall be substituted in all cases for the separate
and solitary confinement at labor required by the ‘act to consolidate, revise and
amend the penal laws of this commonwealth.’”?
83. Whenever, hereafter, any person shall be condemned to suffer death by hang-
ing, for any crime of which he shall have been convicted, the said punishment shall
be inflicted upon him within the walls or yard of the jail of the county in which he
shall have been convicted; and it shall be the duty of the sheriff or coroner of
the said county to attend and be present at such execution, to which he shall
invite the presence of: a physician, the district-attorney of the county, and twelve
reputable citizens, who shall be selected by the sheriff; and the said sheriff shall,
at the request of the criminal, permit such ministers of the gospel, not exceeding
two, as he may name, and any of his immediate relatives, to attend and be present
at such execution, together with such officers of the prison, and such of the sheriff’s
deputies as the said sheriff or coroner, in his discretion, may think it expedient to
have present ; and it shall be only permitted to the persons above designated to wit-
ness the said execution: Provided, That no person under age shall be permitted, on
any account, to witness the same. And after the execution, the said sheriff or cor-
mer shall make oath or affirmation, in writing, that he proceeded to execute the
‘aid criminal, within the walls or yard aforesaid, at the time designated by the death
warrant of the governor; and the same shall be filed in the office of the clerk of the
court of oyer and terminer of the aforesaid county, and a copy thereof published in
two or more newspapers, one at least of’ which shall be printed in the county where
the execution took place.®
84. All indictments which shall hereafter be brought or exhibited for any crime
or misdemeanor, murder and voluntary manslaughter excepted, shall be brought or
exhibited within the time and limitation hereafter expressed, and not after; that
is to say, all indictments and prosecutions for treason, arson, sodomy, buggery,
robbery, burglary, perjury, counterfeiting, forgery, uttering or publishing any bank
note, check or draft, knowing the same to be counterfeited or forged, shall be
brought or exhibited within five years next after the offence shall have been com-
mitted ; and all indictments and prosecutions for other felonies not named or excepted
heretofore in this section, and for all misdemeanors, perjury excepted, shall be brought
or exhibited within two years next after such felony or misdemeanor shall have been
committed: Provided, however, That if the person against whom such indictment
shall be brought or exhibited, shall not have been an inhabitant of this state, or
usual resident therein, during the said respective terms for which he shall be subject
and liable to prosecution as aforesaid, then such indictment shall or may be brought
or exhibited against such person at any period within a similar space of time during
which he shall be an inhabitant of, or usually resident within this state: And ipro-
vided also, That indictments for misdemeanors committed by any officer of a bank,
or other corporation, may be commenced and prosecuted at any time within six
years from the time the alleged offence shall have been committed.*
1Act 31 Maroh 1860 3 74, Purd. 561. In persons convicted to county work-houses, may
New York, a law similar to that contained in the fix the terms of such sentence. Purd. 562.
last proviso, was held to be merely directory. 5 Act 31 March 1860 2 76. Purd. 561.
1 Park. Cr, 0. 374, ‘Ibid. 377. Purd. 1218, The limitation is to be
7 Act 31 March 1860 375, Purd. 562. The computed from the time of finding a true bill, not
act 12 June 1878 provides, that the several courts fromthe making of the complaint, 57 Penn.St.443.
of quarter sessions, authorized by law to sentence
CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. 921
a a se any lee eu court of criminal jurisdiction, shall
received, for the i of the ohn ean ae Lee
i , s he respective counties in which such fines shall have been
imposed as aforesaid, as is now directed by law.!
86. All prisoners who have been or shall hereafter be convicted of any offence
against the laws of the state of Pennsylvania, and confined in any state prison or
penitentiary in execution of the judgment or sentence upon such conviction, who
so conduct themselves that no charge for misconduct shall be sustained against
them, shall, if the governor shall so direct, have a deduction of one month on each of
the first two years, of two months on each succeeding year to the fifth year, and
of three months on each following year to the tenth year, and of four months on
each remaining year of the term of their sentence, and shall be entitled to their dis-
charge so much the sooner, upon the certificate of the warden or principal keeper of
such prison or penitentiary, with the approval of the board of inspectors of the same.
87. It shall be the duty of the wardens or keepers of the state penitentiaries of
_this commonwealth, to receive into the prisons under their charge, on the order or
warrant of the governor, any person convicted of any crime punishable with death
whose sentence shall have been commuted by the governor, on condition of being
confined for life, or for a term of years, in one of the state penitentiaries, and to
keep and confine such person safely, as is by law provided for the keeping and con-
finement of convicts sentenced to imprisonment in the penitentiaries of this com-
monwealth, and subject to the laws and regulations providing therefor ; and it shall
be the duty of the sheriff of the county in which such person was condemned, on
the receipt of such order or warrant of the governor, to immediately convey such
person to the state penitentiary, at the cost of such county, and deliver said order
or warrant to the warden or keeper of said penitentiary : Provided, That the persons
convicted in any of the counties composing the Eastern district, and whose sen-
tences may be commuted, shall be confined in the state penitentiary of said district,
and those convicted in any of the counties composing the Western district, and
whose sentences may be commuted, shall be confined in the state penitentiary of
said district.*
The commissioners to revise the penal code say, in their report :—It will be
perceived that in prescribing the punishment of the various crimes, the maximum
amount to be inflicted has only been defined ; the principle found in some codes,
that upon conviction, a certain minimum amount of punishment shall, under any
state of circumstances, be imposed on the culprit, being entirely excluded ; a broad
discretion being thus given to the courts, in order that the extent of punishment
imposed should, in every case, bear a due relation to the relative enormity of the
offence. It is this enlightened and humane principle which distinguishes modern
criminal jurisprudence from the system of blind and indiscriminate severity which
it has happily superseded ; a system which seemed to regard a criminal as a noxious
excrescence on society, to be ruthlessly extirpated, rather than as a diseased mem-
ber, to be rendered, if possible, whole: In all modern penal legislation, the truth
of this principle has been admitted, but in its mode of application there has been
the United States, does not stop the running
of the statute; it is enough, that the offender’s
customary residence was in the state during the
two years. The proviso was meant for persons
escaping and absenting themselves to avoid pun-
ishment, until lapse of time might enable them
tOreturn with impunity. 51 Penn. St. 255. The
The finding of an informal presentment is not
sufficient to take the case out of the statute. 1
Cr. C. C. 485. Nor will a former indictment, on
which a nolle prosequi was entered. 3 McLean
469. Under this section, it is not necessary that
the case be prosecuted to final judgment within
the two years; it is enough, that the indictment
be found, and brought to the notice of the defend-
ant. 1 Brewst. 329. The statute runs against
an indictment for bigamy, from the time of the
second marriage. 81 Penn. St. 428. 10 Phila.
206. Against a prosecution for fornication and
bastardy, from the time the child was begotten,
not from its birth. 28 Pena. St. 259. And see
85 Ibid. 482. 97 Ibid. 397. 1 Chest. Co. R. 102.
The limitation need not - aoe Pe it
ken advantage of on the general issue.
Bt oa BE 259. See 3 Cr. C. C. 442. 5 Ibid.
38, 60, 368. 1 Brewst. 329. The fact that the
defendant has entered into the military service of
exception of cases of perjury, includes subornation.
2 Chest. Co. R. 499. The act 23 March 1877,
Purd. 1219, fixes the limitation in cases of
forgery, whether a misdemeanor or a felony, at
five years. And the act 12 June 1878, Purd.
1218, provides that the limitation of indictments
for misdemeanors by corporation officers shall be
four years.
1 Act 31 March 1860 3 79. Purd. 561.
2 Act 21 May 1869. Purd. 562, The act 12
February 1870 extends this provision to prisoners
in county jails. Pamph. 32.
3 Act 29 April 1874. Purd. 561.
922 CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE.
much variance; in some, a maximum extent of punishment has been prescribed by
the lawgiver, leaving its modification to the intelligent and experienced discretion
of the criminal tribunals; in others, a maximum and minimum extent of punishment
have been provided, greater or less than which, the tribunals are forbidden to inflict
under any possible state of circumstances; in some, the extent of punishment,
within certain prescribed limits, is referred to the discretion of the jury by whose
verdict the criminal has been convicted ; in others, crimes have been divided into
degrees, more or less minute, to which graduated punishments have been assigned,
and the jury trying the offender have been required, in the event of his conviction,
to determine the degree of his guilt. In effect, the two last systems are the same,
as the power to determine the degree of punishment as affixed by law, gives sub-
stantially the power to impose the punishment to be inflicted for the crime.
Neither of these systems has been absolutely adopted in Pennsylvania; a mean
between the first two has been taken; in minor crimes, maximum punishments only
have been prescribed; the minimum principle being introduced in reference to
those of a graver nature. In all these systems, the leading object of the lawgivers
has been to produce an harmonious relation between the real magnitude of the crime
and the severity of its punishment; the difference between them being only as to
the most effective means of accomplishing an object equally desired by all.
Amongst them, the commissioners give the decided preference to that which
simply determines the maximum punishment to be inflicted on the crime, leaving
all intermediate degrees of punishment to be determined by the criminal tribunals,
according to the greater or less atrocity of the circumstances attending the commis-
sion of the crime. That such an important discretionary authority would be more
steadily, uniformly and consistently exercised, by an upright, learned, responsible
and experienced tribunal, than by a jury, is a proposition not likely to be disputed
by any one familiar with judicial proceedings. ;
The sole apparent advantage to be derived from requiring, by law, that a party
convicted of a crime shall receive a given amount of punishment, whatever may be
its intrinsic character, and under whatever circumstances of extenuation it may
been committed, is to prevent parties convicted of crimes of heinous character from
obtaining immunity through the weakness or dishonesty of judges. The instances
of the former are rare in this commonwealth; of the latter, none is believed by us
ever to have existed ; the purity of our judiciary is one of the things which calumny
has, as yet, left untouched. To guard against a theoretical and problematical evil,
it does not seem wise or expedient to introduce a positive and actual one; whoever
has been long and extensively engaged in the practical administration of criminal
justice, under the maximum and minimum systems of punishments, has found
occasions in which the statutory minimum punishment has greatly exceeded that
which ought to have been inflicted on the offender under the special circumstances
of the case.
The experienced criminal magistrate knows that the same nominal crimes present
almost infinite shades of atrocity ; whilst in some, no extenuating circumstance
softens the malignity of the offence, or challenges mercy for the offender, in others,
the established facts are barely sufficient to constitute the technical crime charged,
and the attendant circumstances, such as to appeal strongly to the best regulated
sympathies. In such cases, it not unfrequently happens that the jury, knowing the
extent of the punishment which must follow a conviction, and regarding it as greater
than the intrinsic turpitude of the offence calls for, acquit a culprit, whom, under
a different system of punishment, they would have convicted. Even when juries,
reasoning on sounder principles, convict such an offender, and the court has imposed
the lowest statutory punishment they are authorized to inflict, the executive is
invoked to correct, by his pardon, the excessive severity of such punishment, and
yields to the solicitation, not because he does not believe a crime has been com-
mitted, requiring, for the sake of public example, that some punishment should
have been inflicted upon the offender, but because, from the inflexibility of the law,
the punishment has been disproportioned to the offence.
The duty of a criminal judge is not simply to punish an offender within the
limits prescribed by law, but it is equally his duty to graduate the punishment
according to the criminal capacity, general intelligence, past conduct and character
NATURALIZATION OF ALIENS, 923
of the culprit, and the aggravating or extenuating circumstances of each particular
case. All positive and arbitrary minimum punishments, necessarily interfere with
the free and full exercise of this judicial duty, and should find no place in a truly
philosophical code of crimes and punishments; besides, minimum punishments do
but restrain judicial mercy, whilst within the maximum limit fixed by law, judicial
severity is left without control. All the members of this commission have been
more or less, extensively engaged in the administration of criminal justice ; the
principle advocated is not, therefore, with them an abstract and untried theory. but
the conviction of long experience and observation in actual criminal administration.
———<—
ACTS OF CONGRESS FOR THE NATURALIZATION OF ALIENS.
Unirep States REVISED STATUTES.
Sxcr. 2165. An alien may be admitted to become a citizen of the United States
in the following manner, and not otherwise :!
I. He shall declare on oath before a circuit or district court of the United
States, or a district or supreme court of the territories, or a court of record of any
of the states having common-law jurisdiction, and a seal and clerk,? two years, at
least, prior to his admission, that it is bond fide his intention to become a citizen of
the United States, and to renounce for ever all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign
prince, potentate, state or sovereignty, and particularly, by name,® to the prince,
hilinti state or sovereignty of which the alien may be at the time a citizen or
subject.
II. He shall, at the time of his application® to be admitted, declare, on oath, before
some one of the courts above specified, that he will support the constitution of the
United States, and that he absolutely and entirely renounces and abjures all
allegiance and fidelity to every foreign prince, potentate, state or sovereignty, and
particularly, by name, to the prince, potentate, state or sovereignty of which he was
before a citizen or subject ; which proceedings shall be recorded by the clerk of the
court.®
TII. It shall be made to appear to the satisfaction of the court admitting such
alien, that he has resided within the United States five years at least,’ and within
the state or territory where such court is at the time held, one year at least ;* and
that, during that time, he has behaved as a man of a good moral character, attached
to the principles of the constitution of the United States, and well disposed to the
1 See 34 Am. L. Reg.1. The naturalization laws
do not exclude females from the right of citizen-
ship. 9 Md. 74. A married woman may be
naturalized. 1 Cr. C. C. 372. And that, without
the concurrence of her husband. 16 Wend. 617.
But an infant alien cannot be naturalized, on his
own petition. 2 Mass. 419. The statutes of
naturalization do not apply to Indians. 7 Opin.
746. See 2 Curt. C. C. 98, and 32173.
2 The process of naturalization is a judicial act,
which congress cannot authoritatively confer on a
state court; but it may be exercised by the state
courts, if not prohibited by the exclusive jurisdic-
tion of the courts of the United States. They
derive no new judicial power from the acts of
congress, but only exercise a power already inher-
ent in them as courts having common-law juris-
diction. 18 B. Mon. 603. 13 How. Pr. 429. 30
Penn. St. 475. In entertaining this jurisdiction,
however, they act exclusively under the laws of
the United States, and should be deemed, gquoad
hoe, courts of the United States. 3 Park. Cr. C.
358. 11 J. & Sp. 523. A state law restricting
its courts and their clerks from entertaining this
jurisdiction, is not unconstitutional. 4 Gray 559.
By the amendment of 1876 (19 Stat. 2), the decla-
ration may be made before the clerk of any of the
courts named.
8 An omission of the name of the sovereign,
will not invalidate the declaration. 8 Blackf. 395.
4 An alien enemy cannot be admitted to make
the preparatory declaration: 32171. 2 GaJl. 11.
See 5 Binn. 371. 2 Bro. 218.
5 It is not sufficient, that he took the oaths at
the time of making his declaration. 2 N. & McC.
351.
6 It is not necessary the record of naturalization
should show that all the legal prerequisites were
complied with, the judgment being conclusive
of such compliance. 7 Cr. 420. 4 Pet. 406. 13
Wend. 524. 5 N. Y. 263, 278. 6 Cr. 176. But
see 18 Ga. 239. A certificate of naturalization
irregularly obtained may be set aside. 2N.&
McC. 351. Naturalization cannot be proved by
parol. 2 Or. 0. 0.139. 13 Leg. Int. 140.
7 The five years residence must be continuous,
9 2170. And it must bea territorial one. +N
Y. Leg. Obs. 98. 1 Cr. 0. C. 243, 18 Ga. 239.
8 It need not be the year next preceding his
application. 41 N. H. 270.
924 NATURALIZATION OF ALIENS.
good order and happiness of the same ;' but the oath of the applicant shall in no case
be allowed to prove his residence.? ; .
IV. In case the alien applying to be admitted to citizenship has borne any
hereditary title, or been of any of the orders of nobility in the kingdom or state
from which he came, he shall, in addition to the above requisites, make an express
renunciation of his title or order of nobility, in the court to which his application
is made, and his renunciation shall be recorded in the court. ;
Sect. 2172. The children of persons who have been duly naturalized® under any
law of the United States, or who, previous to the passing of any law on that subject
by the government of the United States, may have become citizens of any one of
the said states, under the laws thereof, being under the age of twenty-one years,
at the time of the naturalization of their parents, shall, if dwelling in the United
States, be considered as citizens of the United States ;° and the children of persons
who are now or have been citizens of the United States, be considered as citizens
thereof; and the children of persons who now are or have been citizens of the United
States, shall, though born out of the limits and jurisdiction of the United States,
be considered as citizens thereof; but no person heretofore proscribed by any state,
or who has been legally convicted of having joined the army of Great Britain during
the revolutionary war, shall be admitted to become a citizen, without the conseut
of the legislature of the state in which such person was proscribed.
Srcr. 2168. When any alien who shall have complied with the first condition
specified in section 2165, dies before he is actually naturalized, the widow and the
children of such alien shall be considered as citizens of the United States, and shall
be entitled to all rights and privileges as such, upon taking the oaths prescribed by
law.®
Sxct. 2167. Any alien, being under the age of twenty-one years, who shall have
resided in the United States three years, next preceding his arriving at that age,’
and who shall have continued to reside therein to the time he may make application
to be admitted a citizen thereof, may, after he arrives at the age of twenty-one
years, and after he has resided five years within the United States, including the
three years of his minority, be admitted a citizen of the United States, without
having made the declaration required in the first condition of section 2165, but
such alien shall make the declaration required therein, at the time of his admission,®
and shall further declare on oath, and prove to the satisfaction of the court,® that
for two years next preceding, it has been his bond fide intention to become a citizen
of the United States; and he shall, in all other respects, comply with the laws in
regard to naturalization.
Szor. 1993. All children heretofore born or hereafter born out of the limits and
jurisdiction of the United States, whose fathers were, or may be, at the time of
their birth, citizens thereof,’ are declared to be citizens of the United States; but
the rights of citizenship shall not descend to children whose fathers never resided
in the United States.
1 The residence and good moral character of
the applicant cannot be established by affidavits ;
but must be proved in court by the testimony
of witnesses. 7 Hill 137. The powers conferred
upon the courts to naturalize aliens are judicial,
and not ministerial, and require an examination
into each case, sufficient to satisfy the court. 18
se 444, 3 Park. Cr. C. 358. See 1 Brewst.
2 See 1 Brewst. 263.
3 This applies to the children of a widow who
has been naturalized. 9 Md. 74.
4 This act is prospective in its operation, and
applies to subsequent as well as present natural-
izations. 8 Paige Ch. 433: contra, 9 Md. 74.
5 The naturalization of the father, ipso facto,
makes his son, then residing in the United States,
acitizen 10 Ark. 621.
6 They cannot be admitted to take the oaths,
if their native sovereign is then at war with the
United States. 5 Binn, 371.
7 This only applies to those who were minors
at the time of their arrival in tho United States.
9 Ark. 191.
8 See9 W.N. C. 159. 24 Minn. 48. 7 Daly
22,
§ See 41 N. H. 270.
10 This applies to children born abroad, not
only of citizens by birth, but also of naturalized
citizens. 10 Rich, Eq. 38.
11 See an able article on the subject, from the
pen of Mr. Horace Binney, in 2 Am. L. Reg. 193.
The offspring of a citizen, born subsequently
to the 14 April 1802, in a foreign government, to
which their father had removed, animo manendt,
and who returned with their father, after they
became of age, were held to be aliens, in 30 Vt.
718. But where a citizen went to Peru, at the age
of 18 years, with the intention of indefinite con-
tinuance there, for the purpose of trading, but
took no steps to be naturalized in Reru, or other-
wise to indicate an intention of a permanent
change of domicil, his child, born to him in Peru,
of a wife, the native of that country, was held to
ee citizen of the United States. 26 N. Y.
AUTHENTICATION OF RECORDS, 925
Secr. 1994. Any woman who is now, or ma i iti
of the United Staten, and who might herself be Detlie See
a citizen.’ ; ae
Srcr. 2166. Any alien of the age of twenty-one years and upward, who has
enlisted, or may enlist, in the armies of the United States, either the regular or
volunteer forces, and has been or may be hereafter honorably discharged, shall be
admitted to become a citizen of the United States, upon his petition without any
previous declaration of his intention to become such ; and he shall not be required
to prove more than one year’s residence within the United States previous to his
application to become such citizen; and the courts admitting such alien shall, in
addition to such proof of residence and good moral character as is now provided
by law, be satisfied, by competent proof, of such person having been honorably dis.
charged from the service of the United States as aforesaid.
Szor, 2169. The provisions of this title shall apply to aliens being free white
persons, and to aliens of African nativity, and to persons of African descent.2
Secor. 2174. Every seaman, being a foreigner, who declares his intention of
becoming a citizen of the United States, in any competent court, and shall have
served three years on board of a merchant vessel of the United States,? subsequent
to the date of such declaration, may, on his application to any competent court, and
the production of his certificate of discharge, and good conduct during that time,
together with the certificate of his declaration to become a citizen, be admitted a
citizen of the United States. And every seaman, being a foreigner, shall, after
his declaration of intention to become a citizen of the United States, and after he
shall have served such three years, be deemed a citizen of the United States, for
the purpose of manning and serving on board any merchant ship of the United
States, anything to the contrary in any previous act of congress notwithstanding ;
but such seaman shall, for all purposes of protection as an American citizen,
be deemed such, after the filing of his declaration of intention to become such
citizen.
ACTS OF CONGRESS FOR THE AUTHENTICATION OF RECORDS.
Unitep States REVISED STATUTES.
Sect. 905. The acts of the legislatures of any state or territory, or of any country
subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, shall be authenticated by having
the seal of such state, territory or country affixed thereto. The records and judicial
1 Under this clause, a woman who, under prior
laws, might be naturalized, becomes tpso facto, by
marriage with a citizen, a naturalized citizen of
the United States. 7 Wall. 496. 80N. Y. 171.
And this, although she resided in a foreign
country at the time of her marriage, and has con-
tinued her actual residence there ever since. 63
N.C. 299. So, an alien woman married to an
alien in a foreign country, and continuing to
reside there until her husband’s death, becomes a
citizen, by the naturalization of her husband,
subsequently to their marriage, and is entitled to
dower in his real estate. 1 Keyes 359.
2 The act 6 May 1882, 2 14, provides that no
state court or court of the United States, shall ad-
mit Chinese to citizenship. 22 Stat. 61. 5 Sawyer
155. But a person born in the United States, of
Chinese parents, residing therein, and not en-
gaged in any diplomatic or official capacity under
the Chinese government, isa citizen of the United
States. 21 Fed. Rep. 905. 3 :
3 This does not extend to service in the United
States navy. 9 W.N. C. 96. :
4 No other authentication of an act of the legis-
lature is required, except the annexation of the
seal of the state; it is presumed, that the person
who affixed the seal had competent authority to
doa. 11 Wheat. 392. 4 Dall. 416. 1 W.C.C.
363. A printed pamphlet containing the laws of
another state is not admissible in evidence. Pet.
C.C. 352. In the courts of the District of Colum-
bia, however, the statute-book of one of the states,
purporting to be published by authority of its
legislature, and deposited in the department of
state, under the act of congress requiring the
secretary of state to obtain copies of the laws of
the several states, is admissible evidence of the
Jaws of such state. 2 Cr. C. C. 346. See 6 Pet.
317, And in the state courts, a printed copy of
an act of assembly, printed under the authority
of the legislature of another state, may be read
in evidence. 12 S.& R.203. 1 Dall. 463, 467.
6 Binn. 327. Andsee4 Dall. 415. 4Cr. 388. 16
Pet. 56. In the federal courts, the states of the
confederacy are not regarded as foreign states,
whose laws and usages must be proved, but as
domestic institutions, whose laws are to be noticed,
without pleading or proof. 9 Pet. 607, 625. 16
How. 65. 5 Phila. 512. And the state courts, in
determining questions subject to be reviewed
in the supreme court of the United States adopt
the same rule, and will take notice of the local
laws of a sister state, in the same manner that the
supreme court would do on a writ of error to their
judgment, 16 Penn. St. 243, 250. 27 Ibid. 479.
Thid. 526. A printed copy of the Irish statutes,
926
AUTHENTICATION OF RECORDS.
proceedings! of the courts of any state or territory, or of any such country? shall be
proved or admitted in any other court within the United States,> by the attestation
of the clerk,‘ and the seal of the court annexed, if there be a seal,® together with
a certificate of the judge, chief justice or presiding magistrate,® that the said
attestation is in due form.” And the said records and judicial proceedings, authen-
ticated, shall have such faith and credit given to them in every court® within the
United States, as they have by law or usage in the courts of the state from whence
the said records are taken.?
Sect. 906. All records and exemplifications of any books, which are or may be
kept in any public office of any state or territory, or in any such country, not
with the oath of a barrister in Ireland, that he had
received them from the King’s printer in Ireland,
and that they are good evidence there, are evi-
dence to show the law of Ireland. 5S. & R. 523.
1 The judicial proceedings here referred to, are
generally understood to be the proceedings of
courts of general jurisdiction, and not those
which are merely of municipal authority. 1
Greenl. Ey. 3 505. And accordingly, it has been
held, that the judgments of justices of the peace
were not within the meaning of these constitu-
tional and statutory provisions. 10 Penn. St.
157. 2 Pick. 448. 4 N. H. 450. 6 Ibid. 567. 5
Ohio 545. 3 Wend. 267. 2 Ill. 558. 1 Green
(Iowa) 78. In Connecticut and Vermont, how-
ever, it is held, that if the jusiice is bound by law
to keep a record of his proceedings, they are
within the meaning of the act of congress. 5 Day
363, 2 Vt. 573. 6 Ibid. 580. And see 3 T. B.
Mon. 62, 44 Ill. 82. 9 Ind. 212. 23 Vt. 435.
1 Cheves 7. And the proceedings of courts of
chancery, and of probate, as well as of the courts
of common law, may be thus proved. 8 Mart.
(N. 8.) 303. 5 Ibid. 517. 6 Ibid. 621. 1 R. 381,
Pet. C. C. 352. 8 Yerg. 142. 2 A. K. Marsh.
290, 298. This clause is not restricted to the case
of judgments. 1 Phila. 272.
2 This does not apply to the records of the
courts of the United States. 1 Cr. C. C. 190.
But though, in terms, it applics only to the state
courts, the rule is equally applicable to those of
the United States. 3 McLean 94. And a judg-
ment of a court of the United States is admissible,
when authenticated in the manner provided in
this act. Hemp. 233.
3 It seems to be generally agreed, that this
method of authentication is not exclusive of any
other which the states may think proper to adopt.
128. & R. 203, 208. 1 D. Chip. 303. 3 Pick.
293. 6 Binn. 321. 3 Leigh 814. 2 Johns. Cas. 119.
1 Hayw. 359. 2 ¥.532. 27 Penn. St. 485. 7 W. 315.
10 Penn. St. 160.
4 The clerk who certifies the record, must be
the clerk of the same court, or of its successor ;
the certificate of his under-clerk, in his absence,
or of the clerk of any other tribunal, office or body,
being held incompetent for this purpose. 4 Bibb
409. 3 Penn. St. 495. 1 Overt. 328. 3 H. &
McH. 502. 24 N.Y. 394. A surrogate acts asa
clerk in certifying his proceedings, and as he also
acts in the capacity of judge, he must certify as
to the authentication. 4 McLean 199. 27 Penn. St.
485. As to the form of attestation, see 7 Cr. 408.
135. & R.135. Ibid. 335,
5 Whenever the court whose record is certified
has no seal, this fact should appear, either in the
certificate of the clork, or in that of the judge. Pet,
C. C. 353. Tho seal of the court must be annexed
to the record itself; it is not enough, that it is an-
nexed to the judge’s certificate. 3 W. C. 0. 126.
6 The certificate must be given by the judge, if
there be but one; or if there be more than one,
then by the chief justice, or presiding judge or
magistrate of the court from whence the record
comes; and he must possess that character at the
time he gives the certificate. A certificate that
he is the judge that presided at the time of trial,
or that he is the senior judge of the courts of law
in the state, is deemed insufficient. 3 Penn. St.
495. 3 Bibb 369. 2 Mart. (N.S.) 497. And so
is the certificate of a judge styling himself
“one of the judges” of the court. Hemp. 94. See
4 McLean 199, 14 Penn. St. 22. 34 Ibid. 74. 71
Ind. 240.
7 A record of another state is not admissible, if
the certificate of the presiding magistrate omit ta
state that the attestation of the clerk is in due
form. Hemp. 538. 1 Brewst. 328. The phrase
“due form” means the form of attestation used in
the state from whence the record comes. Pet. C.
C. 354. And the certificate of the presiding judge
being the evidence prescribed by law, that this
form has been observed, is at once indispensabla
and conclusive. 7 Cr. 408. 4 McLean93. 2 W.
& M.4. No proof of the judge’s signature is
required; nor is any evidence of his official char-
acter. 18 N. Y. 94. A certificate that the person
whose name is signed to the attestation is clerk
of the court, and that the signature is his own
handwriting, is not in conformity with the pro-
visions of the act. Pet. 0. C. 352. And see 76
N. Y. 103. Where, however, the record of a judg-
ment of a state court is offered ip evidence, in
the circuit court, sitting within the same state, the
certificate of the clerk and seal of the court is a
sufficient authentication. 6 McLean 24.
5 See 18 B. Mon. 199.
% A judgment of a state court has the same
credit, validity and effect, in every other conrt
within the United States, which it had in the
state where it was rendered; and whatever pleas
would be good in a suit thereon, in such state,
and none others, can be pleaded in any other
court within the United States. 3 Wheat. 234,
7 Cr. 481. 2 McLean 511. 2W. & M.4. 2
Paine 502. Ibid. 209, Pet. C. C. 74; s.0. 3 W.
C. CG. 17. Ibid. 48. Pet. C. C. 157. 2 Dall.
302. 2 Mich. 165. 9S. & R. 260. 10 Ibid. 240.
2 Am. Lead. Cas. 774. But although this act
makes a judgment regularly recovered in another
state, and duly authenticated, conclusive evidence
of an established demand, as of the date of such
judgment, it does not prevent the several states
from enacting statutes of limitation, barring
actions on such judgments in their courts. 9
How. 522. 13 Pet. 312. 20 How. 23. Nor
does it apply to a judgment recovered against
® non-resident joint-debtor, without notice to
him; such a judgment is not entitled to any
faith or credit out of the state in which it
was rendered. 11 How. 165. 27 Penn. St. 520.
1 Dall, 261, 1 Pen. 400. 4 Bradf. 174. So, an
action of debt will not lie against an adminis-
trator in one state, on a judgment recovered
against a different administrator of the same
intestate, appointed under the authority of an-
other state. 6 How. 44. But such judgment is
prima facie valid, and will stop the running of the
statute of limitations against the original cause of
action. 13 How. 458. Ibid. 469. See 24 How. 195,
FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCES. 927
appertaining to a court,! shall be proved or admitted in any other court or office, in
any other state or territory, or any country subject to the jurisdiction of the United
States, by the attestation of the keeper of the said records or books, and the seal
of his office annexed, if there be a seal, together with a certificate of the presiding
justice of the court of the county, parish or district in which such office is or may
be kept, or of the governor, or secretary of state, the chancellor or the keeper of the
great seal of the state or territory, or country, that the said attestation is in due
form,’ and by the proper officer.’ If the said certificate is given by the presiding
justice of a court, it shall be further authenticated by the clerk or prothonotary of
the said court, who shall certify, under his hand and the seal of his office, that the
said presiding justice is duly commissioned and qualified; or if given by such
governor, the secretary, chancellor or keeper of the great seal, it shall be under the
great seal of the state, territory or country in which it is made. And the said
records and exemplifications, so authenticated, shall have such faith and credit given
to them in every court and office within the United States, as they have by law or
usage in the courts or offices of the states from whence the same are taken.
OOS
STATUTE OF FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCES.
Strat. 13 Eniz. cap. 5. Ros. Dia. 295.
Srcr. 1. For the avoiding and abolishing of feigned, convinous, and fraudulent
feoffments, gifts, grants, alienations, conveyances,* bonds,> suits, judgments, and
executions,® as well of lands and tenements, as of goods and chattels,’ more com-
monly practised in these days than hath been seen or heard of heretofore ; which
feoffments, gifts, grants, alienations, conveyances, bonds, suits, judgments and
executions, have been, and are, devised and contrived of malice, fraud, covin,
collusion or guile, to the end, purpose and intent, to delay, hinder or defraud
ereditors® and others, of their just and lawful actions, suits, debts, accounts,
1 These are obviously among the public writings
recognised by the common law as invested with
an official character, and therefore susceptible of
proof by secondary means, but which are not
of the nature of judicial records or judgments. Of
this kind are acts and orders of the executive
of the state; the acts of the legislative bodies;
the journals of either branch of the legislature ;
registers kept in public offices ; books which con-
tain the official proceedings of corporations, if the
public at large are concerned with them; parish
registers, and the like. 10 Penn. St. 158.
2 See 9 Cr. 122.
8 See 1 Burr’s Trial 98.
4 Anassignment containing a clause restraining
the assignees from selling real estate for a period
of three years, is void as to creditors. 1 R. 171.
5 Penn. St. 480. If, however, a creditor accept a
dividend under it, he will be estopped. 1 R. 163.
See 9 Penn. St. 207.
5 If a bond be taken for more than the real
debt, with intent to defraud creditors, the whole
bond is void as respects creditors. 118. & R. 328.
8 Penn. St. 52. In such case, the court will set
aside a judgment and execution, and direct an
issue to try the validity of the bond, and the
quantum of the debt. 1 Y.552. See 3 Penn. St.
81.
6 The statute avoids all executions issued or
kept on foot with intent to delay, hinder and de-
fraud creditors; and, therefore, if one execution-
creditor, by management or arrangement, hinder
the sale of personal property levied on, and upon
which other executions are also levied, he thereby
postpones his right to the proceeds of sale, and
the subsequent execution-creditors, thus delayed,
will be preferred. 3 .P. & W. 487. 3 R. 341, 4
Tbid, 380. 5 Whart. 150. An execution put into
the hands of the sheriff, and levied upon personal
property, with any other than a bond fide inten-
tion of selling the property and making the money,
is fraudulent as to the subsequent execution-cred-
itors. 3 W. & 8. 285. 7 Ibid. 67. 2 Penn. St.
331. 9 Ibid. 349. 10 Ibid. 395. 13 Ibid. 409.
40 Ibid. 244, 41 Ibid. 277. 5 R. 286. See 4
Penn. St. 153. 18 Ibid. 510. 20 Ibid. 46. 25
Ibid. 145. 2 Phila. 310. 37 Leg. Int. 38.
7 To render an assignment of personal chattels
valid, possession must accompany and follow it.
1 Binn. 521. 4 Ibid. 258. 4 85. & R. 123. 5
Ibid. 278. 10 Ibid. 201. Ibid. 419. 2 Whart, 302.
6 Ibid. 53. 6 W. & 8. 94. 3 Penn. St. 328. Ibid.
442. 5 Ibid. 326. 11 Ibid. 264. 14 Ibid. 265.
40 Ibid. 352. 43 Ibid. 418. 1 Pears. 248. 2
Ibid, 232. A concurrent possession in the vendor
apd vendee is not enough. 43 Penn. St. 104. 44
Ibid. 407. 69 Ibid. 134. But this rule does not
extend to a judicial sale, 2 P. & W.481. 10 W.
44, 5W.&S.309. 88 Penn. St.496. 93 Ibid. 79.
94 Ibid. 405. The retention of the pcesession
avoids the contract only as to creditors and
purchasers. 5 W.& 8, 149. 7 Ibid. 373. The
question of change of possession is for the
jury. 30 Penn. St. 539. 68 Ibid. 308. 89 Ibid.
136. 91 Ibid. 428. 96 Ibid. 31. 98 Ibid. 285. It
must be clearly established by direct evidence.
5 Phila. 135. Where the transfer of possession
corresponds with the sale, the nature of the pro-
perty, and the relation of the parties, the sale will
be valid, unless fraudulent in fact. 26 Penn. St
72. 64 Ibid. 352. And see 94 Ibid. 156. Ibid.
46.
8 The statute does not render void a convey-
ance, simply because the grantor is indebted;
there must be a debt bearing some proportion to
to the property retained, which may render its
928 FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCES.
damages, penalties, forfeitures, heriots, mortuaries and reliefs, not only to the let
or hindrance of the due course and execution of law and justice, but also to the
overthrow of all true and plain dealing, bargaining and chevisance between man
and man, without the which no commonwealth or civil society can be maintained
or continued : . :
Seor. 2. Be it, therefore, declared, ordained and enacted by the authority of this
present parliament, that all and every feoffment, gift, grant, alienation, bargain and
conveyance of lands, tenements, hereditaments, goods and chattels, or of any of
them, or of any lease, rent, common or other profit or charge out of the same lands,
tenements, hereditaments, goods and chattels, or any of them, by writing or other-
wise ; and all and every bond, suit, judgment and execution, at any time had or
made, sithence the beginning of the Queen’s majesty’s reign, that now is, or at any
time hereafter to be had or made, to or for any intent or purpose before declared
and expressed,! shall be from henceforth deemed and taken (only as against that
person or persons, his, or their heirs, successors, executirs, administrators and
assigns, and every of them, whose actions, suits, debts, accounts, damages, penalties,
forfeitures, heriots, mortuaries and reliefs, by such guileful, covinous or fraudulent
devices and practices, as is aforesaid, are, shall or might be, in any ways, disturbed,
hindered, delayed or defrauded)? to be clearly and utterly void, frustrate, and of
none effect ;° any pretence, color, feigned consideration, expressing of use, or any
other matter or thing to the contrary notwithstanding.*
Sxot. 6. This act, or anything therein contained, shall not extend to any estate
or interest in lands, tenements, hereditaments, leases, rents, commons, goods or
chattels, had, made, conveyed or assured, or hereafter to be had, made, conveyed
or assured, which estate or interest is, or shall be, upon good consideration,® and
3 P. & W-. 164, 166. 5 W.
404. 4 Whart.27. 6 W.&S. 97,101. 12 Penn.
St. 109. 25 Ibid. 509. 1 Wall. Jr. C. C. 107.
1 To bring a case within the statute, the con-
veyance must be voluntary; it must be made by
the owner of the land, he being at the time
indebted; and the conveyance must. be made with
intent to delay, hinder and defraud creditors or
others of their just and lawful actions, &c.; and
in general the intent will be presumed from the
circumstances of the party conveying being
indebted. Where these circumstances occur, the
conveyance is void, as well in respect to subse-
quent as to prior creditors. Pet. 0. C. 460, 464.
12S. & R. 448. A voluntary deed is not void as
to subsequent creditors, unless there be other cir-
cumstances, besides the want of consideration,
from which fraud can be legally inferred: as, if
the grantor incur debts immediately, or so soon
afterwards as to warrant a presumption that it
was made in contemplation of such future indebt-
edness, so, if he were indebted, at the time, to the
extent of insolvency, or, it seems, of great embar-
rassment; unless the presumption of fraud be
repelled, by proving that the’ prior debts were
secured by mortgage, or by a provision in the deed
itself. 4 W. C. C. 129. And see 39 Penn. St. 499.
44 Thid. 413. 50 Ibid. 54. 90 [bhid. 293. The proof
of prior indebtedness rests upon the party attempt-
ing to avoid a deed, on the ground of subsequent
indebtedness, and the court will not presume it.
4 . C. C. 129. See 4 Penn. St. 178. 14 Ibid.
489.
2 A voluntary conveyance, though void against
creditors, is good against the grantor, and all
claiming under him. 1 Y¥. 291. 4 Ibid. 95. Ibid.
280. 5 Binn. 109. 138. & R. 224. 16 Ibid. 211.
payment doubtful.
5 W. 378. Ibid. 456. 6 Ibid. 429. Ibid.453. 3
W. & S. 255. 16 Penn, St. 57. 29 Ibid, 219. 51
Ibid. 373. 103 Ibid. 7. Hithor party may uso it
against the other. 3 W.& §. 255. And neither
party can set up the fraud against the other. 13
5. & R. 224, 7 W. 14. 8 Penn. St. 495. 16 [bid.
50. Tho administrator of a fraudulent grantor,
though himself a creditor, cannot impeach the
conveyance. 2 W. 226. But if the estate be
insolvent, he may do so, as a trustee for the cred-
itors. Ibid. 6 W.453. Whether a party who
seeks to set aside a conveyance, under this statute,
be a purchaser for a valuable consideration, is
a question of fact for the jury. 3 W.151. 87
Penn. St. 40.
3 Such deed is absolutely void, and vests no
interest whatever, either legal or equitable, in the
grantee. 3 W. 230. 33 Penn. St. 232. It is to be
considered as if no conveyance had been made,
as against the interest intended to be defrauded.
2P.& W. 82. But if it inure not only to the
benefit of the fraudulent grantee, but also of bond
Jide creditors of the grantor, though void as to
the grantee, it is good as to such creditors. 1 Ash.
212. Such conveyance changes the title; and
after-acquired judgments against the grantor are
not liens against the same title as prior ones;
such prior liens are not, therefore, affected by a
sale under subsequent judgments. 31 Penn. St.
241, 33 Ibid. 294. 44 Ibid. 95. 67 Ibid. 434.
* An assignment by a debtor to o particular
creditor, is void, if there be a private agreement
for the benefit of the grantor, and the transaction
taken altogether has a direct tendency to protect
the property from other creditors, although the
amount of the property assigned be not equal to
the debt due to the assignee. 128. & R.198. A
conveyance in trust to sell, by one indebted,
reserving a power of appointing the procceds, is
void, and is not rendered valid by a subsequent
appointment of the proceeds for the benefit of
creditors. 13 Penn. St. 306.
5 An agreement to pay incumbrances is a suffi-
cient consideration, even as against creditors. 6
W.&5S.72. 2 Penn. St. 397, 21 Ibid. 495. See
2W.406. 41 Penn. St. 234. But where one claims
to hold as a purchaser, for a valuable considera-
tion, as against the creditors of the grantor, he
must prove the payment of the purchase-money
by other evidence than the receipt at the foot of
of the deed. 4 W. 359. 16 Penn. St. 488. 25
Ibid. 509. See 18 Ibid. 109. A precedent debt
is a sufficient consideration, if equal in value to the
RIGHTS AND DUTIES OF JURYMEN. 929
bond, fide’ lawfully conveyed or assured to any person or persons, or bodies politic
or corporate, not having, at the time of such conveyance or assurance to them made
any manner of notice or knowledge of such covin, fraud or collusion, as is aforesaid :
anything before mentioned to the contrary hereof notwithstanding. :
————
THE RIGHTS AND DUTIES OF JURYMEN.
Tuere have been heavy and general complaints of the want of a proper publicati
expounding the rights and duties of jurymen. On their intelligence on pleiene
we mainly depend for the security of our lives and properties; our liberties and reputa-
tion. If they are ignorant or venal, where shall we look for protection from the profligate
and the powerful? “Sir John Hawkes, knight, solicitor-general to the late King
William,”’ published a treatise on this subject, in the year 1680, in the form of a dialogue
between a barrister at law and a juryman. '
This pamphlet has not been superseded nor set aside by any publication which has
appeared since that time, more than two centuries ago. ‘This is no mean evidence
of the intrinsic value of the book. It is to this day frequently published and freely
circulated throughout the British islands, unaccompanied by any modern note or com-
ment. Societies for the diffusion of useful knowledge distribute, annually, in England,
many thousand copies. The orthography and punctuation have been modernized, but
the sense has in no wise been affected.
The origiual publication of this dialogue having been in the days of William Penn, it
may be regarded as being as much addressed to Americans as to Englishmen, and as
truly the law in Pennsylvania asin England. These facts and considerations induce a
belief that the re-publication of this exposition of the rights and duties of jurymen cannot
fail of diffusing much useful information.
Barrister. My old client! a good morning to you: whither so fast? you seem
intent upon some important affair.
Juryman. Worthy sir! I am glad to see you thus opportunely, there being scarce
any person that I could at this time rather have wished to meet with.
Barr. I shall esteem myself happy, if in anything I can serve you. The business,
I pray ?
Jurym. I am summoned to appear upon a jury, and was just going to try if I
could get off. Now I doubt not but you can put me into the best way to obtain
that favor.
Barr. It is probable I could: but first let me know the reasons why you desire
to decline that service.
Jurym. You know, sir, there is something of trouble and loss of time in it:—
and men’s lives, liberties and estates (which depend upon a jury’s guilty, or not
guilty, for the plaintiff, or for the defendant) are weighty things. I would not
wrong my conscience for a world, nor be accessory to any man’s ruin. There are
others better skilled in such matters. I have ever so loved peace, that I have
forborne going to law (as you well know) many times, though it hath been much to
my loss.
Barr. T commend your tenderness and modesty; yet must tell you, these are but
general and weak excuses. ms
As for your time and trouble, it is not much ; and however, can it be better spent
than in doing justice and serving your country? To withdraw yourself in such
price stipulated, and that be the fair value of Great inadequacy of price is evidence of fraud.
the land. 3 Penn. St. 242. See 2Ibid. 331. 8 4 Penn St. 178, And see 7 W. 305. 21 Penn. St.
Tbid. 213. 21 Ibid. 327. Ibid. 495. 27 Ibid. 495. 24 Ibid. 347.
144. 38 Ibid. 446. 1 A boné fide purchaser of a chattel from a
A conveyance from & father to his sons, who fraudulent grantee, is protected by this section.
were to pay nothing but the interest of the pur- 1 Ash. 129.