Tee EE = ee SS SSS = a Ee SS : = ee SSS a = =rsSs SSS ee ss a Sees = Ss = =F 2S === SS = ee a eS = a Sree ee iemiaconaeene ee eee CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY ENGINEERING LiBRARY Cc QE 1 v4 Tia 0 REPORT GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF OHIO. ZOOLOGY AND BOTANY, PART I. ZOOLOGY. Fart T. never faublished i OFFICERS OF THE SURVEY. J.S. NEWBERRY, CH1EF GEOLOGIST. EDWARD ORTON, “ ‘i a 2 “ . - s ASSISTANT GEOLOGIST. E. B. ANDREWS, 3 ‘ . * ‘ : 3 . ASSISTANT GiOLOGIST. T. G. WORMLEY, 3 i ‘ 7 ‘ . ‘ ‘ . CHEMIST. F. B. MEEK, i : 3 ‘ 5 . 5 ‘ ‘ ‘ PALEONTOLOGIST. SPECIAL ASSISTANTS IN ZOOLOGY AND BOTANY. J. M. WHEATON, A. W. BRAYTON, H. C. BEARDSLEE, D. 8. JORDAN, W. H. SMITH, R, M. BYRNES. PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY OF THE LEGISLATURE OF OHIO. COLUMBUS: | NEVINS & MYERS, STATE PRINTERS. 1882. GAL + TABLE OF CONTENTS. PART I.—ZOOLOGY. PAGE. Prerace. By J. 5S. NEWBERRY... . 1.2... eee eee v SECTION I. REPORT ON THE MAMMALIA OF OHIO. By A. W. Brayton. . . . 1-185 SECTION II. REPORT ON THE BirpDs oF OnIO. By J. M. Wheaton, M.D... . 187-628 SECTION III. REPORT ON THE REPTILES AND AMPHIBIANS OF OnIO. By W. H. Smith; M:Di, Pae-Dosose we we we 629-734 SECTION Iv. REPORT ON THE FISHES OF OHIO. By David L. Jordan, M.D. . . 735-1002 PREF ACH. The plan for the publication of the reports of the Geological Survey, sub- mitted to and adopted by the Geological Board, contemplated the publication of two volumes on Geology, two on Paleontology, one on Zoology and Botany, one on Economic Geology, and a Geological Map of the State. The Geological Corps were required by the organic law of the Survey to investigate the general geological structure of the State; to collect, study, and describe the fossils contained in the rocks, and to make surveys and reports upon the Geology and resources of each one of its eighty-eight counties. As the material was gathered in obedience to these instructions, it was soon found that the report would exceed in dimensions the estimate made for it. The preparation of a third volume on Geology, and a third on Paleontology was, therefore, authorized by the Geological Board. Of the series of publications enumerated above, two volumes on Geology and two on Paleontology only had been finished when the appropriations for the continuance of the work of the Geological Corps were suspended by the Legislature. Since that date Vol. III, Part I, Geology, and the Geological Map of the State have been finished by the gratuitous labor of the Corps, and with an expenditure of several hundred dollars from the private resources of the Chief Geologist. They also have been published by the authority of the Legislature. The volume on Zoology and Botany was also prepared, and its publication was authorized in 1878. The reports written for this volume were as follows: On Mammals, by Prof. A. W. Brayton; on Fishes, by Dr. D. S. Jordan; on Birds, by Dr. J. M. Wheaton; on Mollusks, by Dr. R. M. Byrnes; on Rep- tiles and Amphibians, by Dr. W. H. Smith; and a catalogue of the plants of the State was compiled by Dr. H. C. Beardslee. The manuscripts of some of these reports, recalled by their authors for changes or additions, were retained by them so long that the publication of the volume has been much delayed. They also have been expanded to such a degree that it has been found impos- sible to include them all in one cover. In the hope of doing this, however, the volume was enlarged to somewhat undesirable dimensions. Of the manu- scripts prepared, those on the Plants of the State by Dr. Béardslee, and on the vi PREFACE. Mollusca by Dr. Byrnes, have not been included, but are left to form, with such additions as may be made to the Zoological and Botanical material, a second part of this volume, of which it is to be hoped the preparation and publication will be accomplished at an early date. In order to make the review of the Botany and Zoology of the State com- plete, Part II of the volume should contain, in addition to those already written on Botany and Conchology, a report on the lower forms of plant life, especially the Fungi, and others on the Articulates—Crustacea, Insects, etc.— including descriptions of all those which ‘are injurious or beneficial to man. These, if properly prepared, will have much scientific value, and especially those on Economic Botany and on Economic Entomology, will be of great and immediate practical value. Some impatience has been expressed at the slow progress of the preparation of the volume on Zoology and Botany, and the late appearance of the part now issued. But it should be remembered that all time and thought which have been expended upon these thorough and voluminous reports, destined to be so creditable and useful to the State, have been gratuitously bestowed. Not a dollar has been paid to the authors for the years they have spent in this work, and justice as well as courtesy demands that the invaluable gifts now made to the people of Ohio by the eminent naturalists who have prepared these reports, should be gratefully acknowledged. Probably no where in the history of scien- tific publication can be found more honorable examples of the gratuitous con- secration of time and learning by men of science to the higher interests of the public. R It is possible also that there are some who will fail to appreciate the value of these detailed reports on the Natural History of the State; but with the excep- tion of some scattered newspaper or magazine articles, nothing has been published in regard to the Zoology of Ohio since the catalogue prepared by Dr. Kirtland was issued in 1838, and in that interval there has been felt a constant want in every town, village, hamlet, and farmhouse of a better knowl- edge of the surrounding objects of nature. In every district school questions are constantly arising, inspired by the natural curiosity of the child, which the teacher has not been able to answer, from the want of means of information in regard to the animals and plants of the State, An interest in nature is almost universal, and its development wholesome and happifying. Hence, the distri- bution of documents that will enable every one to learn the character and history of the objects that surround him, will prove not only a gratification but a benefit to a great multitude. All this for the educational influence of such reports. Their bearing upon the practical life of our people is not less real, since a knowledge of the habits of the animals that contribute to the support of man, the birds of the air, the beasts of the field, the fishes of the waters, PREFACE. vii will be of great service as a guide in all efforts to increase the productiveness of these sources of aliment. So a knowledge of the plants that serve for beauty or use will make a man a better farmer, a happier and more useful citizen. These considerations are so obvious that no labored argument should be neces- sary to demonstrate the utility of volumes like this now presented to the public, and the economy of the expenditure of the small sum which it has cost. The avidity with which it will be sought by thousands of our citizens will soon attest their high estimate of its value. For the care and accuracy with which the volume has been edited, credit is to be given to Dr. J. M. Wheaton, who, in addition to the preparation of the most voluminous report contained in it, assumed the onerous position of editor, has read all the proof, and has decided all the difficult questions of typography. For the mechanical execution of the book we are indebted to the courtesy and cooperation of the Supervisor of Public Printing, Col. J. K. Brown, and to the technical skill of the Public Printers, Messrs. Nevins & Myers. Of the other volumes contemplated in the original plan of publication of the results of the Geological Survey, only the Second Part of Vol. III, on Paleontology, and Vol. V, on Economic Geology, yet remain unpublished ; but the work has progressed slowly, since it has been done without aid from the State. It would before this have been presented to the Legislature for publi- cation, bnt the opinion has been expressed by the friends of the Geological Survey that it was not at present wise to request appropriations for a volume regarded by some as ornamental rather than useful, and that it should wait the completion of the volume long half done, on Economic Geology. The delay in the pubiication of this latter volume has been dependent upon a failure to make the appropriation of the small sum necessary to finish the field work and the maps that should accompany it. For this money was absolutely necessary, and the sum of $5,000 was asked some years ago. During the last session the Legislature appropriated the desired sum, placed the work in charge of Prof. Orton, and it is in a fair way tobe completed. When that volume shall have been issued it is to be hoped that measures will be taken to secure the publica- tion of the two half volumes, one on Botany, etc.; the other on Paleontology, which will render the series symmetrical and complete. Enough has been said in regard to the Botanical and Entomological reports to show their utility and the importance of having them published and distrib- uted. ‘This is not the place to advocate the completion of the reports on the Paleontology of the State; but it is permissible to say that the prejudice that opposes the publication of figures and descriptions of the fossils contained in our rocks is a narrow and unwise one. Aside from the wide-spread interest felt in these extinct forms of animal and plant life, their practical value is un- deniable and great. Every geologist knows that fossils constitute his most Vill PREFACE. reliable guides. They are the criteria by which he judges of the ages and relative positions of the rocks containing them, and thus are labels written upon these rocks, which to one who has learned the language are easily read, and are infallible. All over the world governments, societies, and individuals are spending large sums of money for the diffusion of just such knowledge as is contained in our paleontological reports, and there is little doubt that sooner or later the extremely interesting material which has been gathered for the third volume on Paleontology will be asked for and given to the public by the authorities of the State. J. S.N. PHOTION 1, REPORT ON THE MAMMALIA OF OHIO. BY A. W. BRAYTON. To Pror. J. 8S. NEWBERRY, Chief Geologist: Dear Sir: The account of the Mammals of Ohio herewith submitted is mainly com- piled from the standard authorities on North American Mammals. The descriptions of the Rodents is largely drawn from the ‘Monograph of North American Rodentia,” by Coues and Allen; of the Mustelidz, from the ‘‘Fur-bearing Animals of North America, by Dr. Coues. The works of Prof. Baird, Dr. Gil], Audubon and Bachman, and Robert Kennicott have been freely used, and such extracts made from them as seemed jadicious and neces- sary. I am also indebted to Mr. Frank W. Langdon, of Madisonville, Hamilton county, Ohio, for valuable lists, field-notes, and other information, drawn chiefly from early histories of Ohio; to Mr. E. W, Nelson, U.S. A., of Chicago, for notes on distribution; to Dr. D. 8. Jordan, whose Manual of Vertebrates has been followed in the serial arrangement of the species, for use of books and specimens, and for the revision of proof-sheets, and for other favors. Itis deemed best to include, in this Monograph, not only the wild animals still living in the State, but also those exterminated within the period of settlement. Very respectfully, A. W. BRAYTON. Irvington, Ind , Oct. 3, 1878. REPORT ON THE MAMMALS OF OHIO. BY A. M. BRAYTON. é The Mammals are air-breathing, warm-blooded vertebrates, having the skin more or less covered with hair; respiration never by branchiz, but after birth by lungs; heart and lungs in the thorax, separated from the abdominal viscera by a muscular diaphragm; the blood with red non- nucleated blood-corpuscles; blood undergoing a complete circulation, being received and transmitted by the right half of the quadrilocular heart to the lungs for aeration, and afterward returned by its other half through the system; aorta single and reflected over the left bronchus. The cerebral hemispheres are connected by an anterior commissure, and a transverse superior commissure, the corpus callosum, the latter more or less roofing in the lateral ventricles; skull with two occipital con- dyles, one each side of the foramen magnum; lower jaw composed of a pair of simple rami, and articulated directly by convex condyles with the squamosal bones. Viviparous; foetus developed from a minute egg, and provided with an amnion and allantois; young nourished for a time after birth by milk secreted in the mammary glands of the‘mother. ORDERS OF MAMMALIA. * Young‘not born until of considerable size, and nearly perfect development, deriving its nourishment before birth from the blood of the mother through the intervention of aplacenta; vagina a single tube, sometimes with a partial septum ; cerebral hemi- spheres connected by a well-developed corpus callosum and a reduced anterior com- missure. (Sub-class Monodelphia.) t Brain with a relatively large cerebrum, behind overlapping much or all of the cere- bellum, and in front much or allof theolfactory lobes ; corpus callosum continued horizontally backwards to or beyond the vertical of the hippocampal sulcus, develop- ing in front a well defined recurved rostrum. (Super-order Educabilia.) Anterior and posterior limbs and pelvis well developed; legs with the proximal joints (humerus and femur) not exserted beyond the common integument of the body. a. Digits with corneous appendages developed as claws; teeth of three kinds; canines specialized and robust; molars, one or more in each jaw, sectorial, adapted for cutting; incisors ¢ ; scaphoid and lunar bones consolidated, placenta deciduate and zonary. . P A ‘ : CaRNIVORA. aa. Digits with corneous appendages developed as hoofs; teeth of three kinds; incisors various, often reduced or wholly suppressed, especially in upper jaw; no developed tusks; scaphoid and lunar bones separate; placenta non-deciduate (diffuse or cotyledonary.) . ‘i . . UNGuLaTa. tt Brain with a relatively small cerebrum, leaving behind much of the cercbellum ex- posed, and in front much of the olfactory lobes; corpus callosum extending more or less obliquely upwards, terminating before the vertical of the hippocampal sulcus; no well defined rostrum in front. (Super-order Ineducabilia.) b. Incisors (very variable in number without persistent pulps) never $or4 >; canines present; molars with sharp and pointed tusks; lower jaw with condyles transverse, received into special glenoid sockets. c. Anterior limbs adapted for flight; ulna and radius; united’; bones of hand and finger much elongated, supporting a thin, leathery skin extending along sides of body to the posterior limbs; mammz pectoral. CHEIROPTERA. ce, Anterior and posterior limbs adapted for walking or grasping; ulna and ra- dius entirely or partially separated; bones of hand and fingers normally developed; mammez abdominal. : : . ‘ INSECTIVORA. bb. Incisors 5 Tarely 4 ; continually produced from persistent pulps, and growing in a circular direotion; canines none; molars with ridged surfaces; lower jaw with condyles longitudinal, not in glenoid cavities, but gliding freely backwards and forwards in longitudinal furrows. . . RoprEntia, “* Young born of very small size, and imperfectly developed, never connected by a placenta to the mother; when born, attached by her to the nipple, from which the milk is forced by the mother into the mouth of the young; cerebral hemispheres chiefly connected by a well-developed anterior commissure, the corpus callosum being rudimentary; vagina more or less completely dividing mto two separate passages. (Sub-class Didelphia.) s 7 5 e 7 ‘i MaR3UPIALIA. 5 SUB-CLASS MONODELPHIA. SUPER-ORDER EDUCABILIA. ORDER CARNIVORA. FAMILIES OF CARNIVORA. * Intestinal canal provided with a cecum; feet digitigrade ; toes 5-4. t Teeth, 28 to 30; dentition, M m.+ pm. 3,c. +, i. 3X 2; head broad; snout short, decurved ; claws sharp, compressed, retractile. . 7 7 . Feri. tt Teeth, typically 42; varying ees 38 and 46 ne ia spel being the varying element.) Dental formula, m.3 ($-3), pm.7,¢c.},1.3%2. . . . Cana. * Intestinal canal without a cxcum; feet usually plantigrade, if not, toes 5~5. t Teeth less than 40; body rather slender; feet often more or less perfectly digitigrade ; toes 5-5. « ‘ y “ a ‘ . ‘ ‘ ‘ c . MUSTELIDZ, tt Teeth 40 or 42; body stout; feet completely plantigrade. a, Tail rudimentary teeth 42; lower jaw with three true molars; body very large and heavy. . : 7 . . : ‘i URSIDE. aa. Tail well developed; teeth 40; hea jaw Sientce: with two true molars; body moderately stout. . . i . ‘ ‘ . PROCYONIDA,. FAMILY FELIDA. The Cats are digitigrade carnivora, with the toes 5-4. They are read- ily known from allied families by the retractile and very sharp, com- pressed claws. The palms and soles are densely hairy, with naked pads under each toe and the ball of the foot. The dentition is reduced to its simplest elements among all ee ee Seilas= incisors, canines, and molars. Formula, i. 3-2; ¢. 4; pm. 3:3, or 2:2; m. 4430 or 28. The canines are long, sharp, more or less curved, usually slightly compressed, and in existing cats possess two longitudinal furrows on the outer side. The posterior molar of the upper jaw, the only permanent one, is very small, and its crown transverse; in front of this is a large sectorial pre- molar, with a smaller tricuspid one in front of it. The first premolar is very small—absent in Lynx. In the lower jaw the posterior molar is sectorial, with two smaller compressed premolars anterior to it. The second upper and first and second lower premolars are trilobed, the cen- tral lobe highest, and the lateral sometimes with accessory notches or lobes. KEY TO THE GENERA OF FELIDZA, * Four molars above on each side (pm. 33 tail at least half the length of trunk; fur compact and glossy; shoulders high; ears not tufted at tips. . . . FELIs. **Three molars above on each side (pm. 33) ; short truncated tail; ears triangular, tufted. : . . . . < ri : . . . * . Lynx, 6 Genus Fenris. Linneus. ¢ Etymology—Latin, Felis, a cat. 1785. Felis, Linneeus, Sytema Nature, I. The Cats are readily known from the Lynxes by the generic marks given above. They are marked externally by the long tapering (some- times tufted) tail, always as Jong as half the body, exclusive of head and neck. The fur is compact, close and glossy, often with symmetrical pat- terns of coloration. The ears have no pencil of hairs at the tip. The general aspect is cat-like. Besides F. concolor, the Panther, the type of the American species, four representat*ves of this well known genus are found in the United States: £. onca (Linneeus), the Jaguar, or American Tiger, from the Red River of Louisiana south to Patagonia, the largest of the American cats; F. pardalis (Linneus), the Ocelot, or Tiger Cat, from the Red River throughout the lower country of Texas; F. eyra (Desm.) the Tiger Cat, a uniform brownish-red cat of the size of the house cat, from the Rio Grande of Texas through Mexico and Central America to Guiana; FF. yaguarundi (Desm.), a grizzled, brownish-gray cat, larger and more elongate than the common cat. It ravages from the Rio Grande to Par- aguay. Friis concotor. (Linneus). PANTHER; CoUGAR; Rocky Mountain Lion; PAINTER; Puma; Black Puma. 1771. Felis concolor, Linn., Mantissa, 1771, 552.—Erxl., Syst. Reg. Anim., 1777, 511, sp. 17.—Bodd., El. Anim., 1784, 90.—Gmel., Syst. Nat., 1788, vol. i, pt. i, 79, sp. 9—Schreb , Siugth., 1778, th. iii, 394, tab. civ.—F. Cuv., Hist. Nat. Mamm., 1829, vol. ii, pl. 143.—Cuv., Ossem. Foss., 1825, vol. iv., 40.—Temm., Mon. Mammif,, 1827, 184.—Wils., Illust. Zodl., 1881, pl. i—Maxilian, Beitr Naturg. Brasil., 1826, band ii, 358. Reug., Zoél. Journ., 1835, vol. v., 476.—Fuller, P. Z. 8., 1836, 62.—Azara, Nat. Hist. Quad. Parag., 1838, 207.—Swains., Anim. Menag., 106.—Rich., Zool. Beechey’s Voy., Mam., 1839, 6.—Griff, Anim. King. 1827, 436.—Burm., Weber. Thier. Bras., 1854, 88.—Murr., Geog. Distr. Anim., 1866, 100.—Gerv., Nat. Hist. Mam., 1855, 89.—Blainv., Osteog., 1839-64, vol. ii., atl. vi, pls. xi, xiv.—Fisch., Zoogu., 1814, 223, sp. 6.—Id., Syn., 1829, 197.—Jard., Nat. Libr., vol. xvi, 124, pls. iv, #— Desi, Mammal., 1820, 218, No. 336, sl: 94, fig. 102.—D’Orbig., Voy. Aree Merid., 1847, 21, Mamm. —Barth., P. Z. S., 1861, 141.—Cunningh., P. Z. S. 1868, 185.—Sclat., P. A S., 1868, 62 —Temm., Mon. Mamm., 1827, vol. i, 134, et App 1777. 1788. 1827. 1830. 1867. 1869. 1869. 1874. 7 256.—Less., Man. Mamm., 1827, 190, sp. 507.—Ccop. & Suck., Nat. Hist. Wash. Terr., 1859, 74, 108.—Baird, U.S. & Mex. B. Sur., 1859, 5.—De Kay, Nat. Hist. N. Y., 1842, 47.—Baird, U. S. P. R. R. Expl. Ex., 1857, vol. viii, 83—Harl., Faun. Amer., 1825, 94.—Wagn., Suppl. Schreb., 1841, 461—Aud. & Bach., Quad. N. Am., vol. ii, 1851, 305, pls. xevi, xevii, (8vo. ed.)— Less., Nouy. Tab. Regn. Anim., 1842, 56, sp. 512.—Newb., P.R. R. Rep., vi, 1857, 36.—Marcy, Rep. Expl. Red River, 1852, 200,— Woodh., Sitgr. Rep. Zufii & Colorado, 1854, 47.—Coues, Am. Nat., i, 1867, 286.—Id., Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila., 1867, 183.—AlL, Bull. Essex Inst., vi, 1862, 53, 58.—Id., Bull. M. C. Z., ii, 1871, 168.—Jordan, Manual of the Vertebrates, 1878, 16, 2nd ed. Felis nigra, Griff., Syn., sp. 444 (?).—Erxl., Syst. Reg. Anim., 1777, 512, sp. 8. Felis discolor, Gmel., Syst. Nat., 1788, vol. i, pt. i, 79, sp. 12.— Schreb., Saugth., 1778.—Fisch., Zcogu., 1814, 223, sp. 6.—Less., Man. Mamm., 1827, 190, sp. 509. Felis wnicolor, Less., Man. Mamm., 1827, p. 190, sp. 508. Felis puma, Shaw, Gen. Zodl., 1830, vol. i, 358, pl. exxxix.— Molina, Saggio Stor. Nat. Chilo, 1810, 245, sp. 8. Leopardus concolor, J. E. Gray, P. Z. &., 1867, 265.—Id., Cat. Carn. Mamm., 1869, 12.—Id., Cat. Mamm. Brit. Mus., 1842, 41. Panthera concolor, Fitzin., Ditzg. Akad, Wiss. Wein., 1869, lix, 629. Panthera concolor niger, Fitzin., Ditzg. Akad. Wiss. Wein., 1869, lix, 634. Puma concolor, J. E. Gray, Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist., 1874, p. —. The panther is the second in size of the North American cats. It is larger than the common sheep or largest dog, weighing sometimes one hundred and fifty pounds. A full sized female, as recorded by Dr. Coues, weighed, without the viscera, eighty pounds; gross weight, estimated, one hundred pounds. The measurements of the same specimen, taken in the flesh, indicate a fair average : INCHES, From nose to end of tail... 22. 22. eens ences seen cane tenn ce cecees caenne 82.00 Head over frontal CUurve...- 2. 2-2 e cece ee cn cee cence een a cece cae 9.50 Head and body to root of tail..-22.-.- 22. cece e cece e eee ee enw eee ceenee 50.00 Pail eeseeaicee sates iasasecnanene soon ase Gen waeea letters eons 32.00 Stature at shoulders... ..2. 2.220. cee ene cece ee cece e cae n ee ce tewees senane 29.00 Fore leg and foot, from elbow...-.. 2.22. -0-0-+ ceeses ceccee enenes onnes 15.50 Sole: of hind: f00b}. cicisiccistcteinis sisitiss Sect ieicie seis tien Sc'eieeieiaie'c Winsstete ade eee 11.00 8 The panther, though smaller than the jaguar, F. onca, stands higher, owing to the greater relative length of its legs. . In color the panther is not unlike’ the Virginia deer. The back and sides are of a tawny brownish color, darker on the dorsal line, the under parts dirty white. The only dark markings are a black patch on the upper lip, and on the convexity of the ears; the tip of tailisdusky. The body of the kittens is densely spotted, as usual in this family, and the tail is ringed. The hair is short, compact, close pressed to skin. The head is small, the ears large, and rounded above; the whiskers are in four horizontal series. This species is common in Colorado, New Mexico, and Arizona, and ranges from fifty to sixty degrees north latitude to the south extreme of the American continent. In certain localities of New Mexico and Arizona it wages a terrible warfare upon wild turkeys, destroying hundreds of them, and depopulat- ing their former breeding ‘places to such an extent that in a few years the race will have become almost extinct in this region if measures are not taken to prevent the wholesale slaughter.—[Coues and Yarrow. ] In Dr. Kirtland’s list of mammals (Ohio Geological Survey for 1838) is the following : “Felis Concolor” and ‘Felis Montana,” Mountain Tiger and Mountain Cat, both known to hunters under the name of ‘Catamount.’ They both formerly inhabited the State, but have now disappeared. Mr. Dorfeuille has in his museum at Cincinnati well prepared specimens of both species that were taken in Ohio.”—[Italics mine. Dorfeuille and his museum are not in existence now, and have not been for years.—LANGDON. ] Mr. Frank W. Langdon, of Madisonville, Hamilton county, Ohio, has given me a series of notes on the mammals of Ohio, chiefly selected from the early histories of the State. From them I select the following: “The first board of county commissioners offered a bounty of three dollars for wolf and panther scalps under six months old, and four dollars on those over six months old. This bounty was discontinued in 1818.” [History of Athens county, Ohio, page 130.—C. M. Walker, 1869.] The following panther anecdote is taken from the Centennial History of Licking county, Ohio, published at Newark, Ohio, by Isaac Smucker: “In the autumn of 1805 Jacob Wilson, living within a mile of Newark, was suddenly called to the door of his cabin by the commotion among his swine and pigs. A huge panther had just seized s pig, and when in the act of making off with it was pursued and treed by the dogs not far from the cabin. The pioneer at once seized his trusty rifle and brought it to bear upon the ferocious beast, which at the first fire fell at the root of the tree among the dogs.” 9 Genus Lynx. Raf. Lynz, Rafinesque, Amer. Month. Mag., I, Oct., 1817, 487.—Ib., IJ, 1817, 46.—Aud. & Bach., N. A. Quad., I, 1849, I. Lynceus, “Gray,” DeKay, New York Zool., I, 1842, 50. Generie Marks —Molars 3-3 (the small anterior premolar of Felis absent.) Tail considerably less than half the body, exclusive of head and neck, generally not much longer than head, abruptly truncate at tip. There are four species of Lynx in the United States: the Canada Lynx, Lynx canadensis, largest of the genus, ranging north, the pads of the feet overgrown with hair so as to be concealed in winter; the other three, L. fasciatus, the Red Cat, L. rufus, the American Wild Cat, and DL. maculatua, the Texan Wild Cat, are smaller, have more naked soles, and are more southern in their distribution. Lynx CANADENSIS, (Desm.) Raf. CanabDa Lynx. 1798. Lynx, Penn., Hist. Quad., 1793, 301, sp. 203. 1816. Felis canadensis, Desm., Nouv. Dict. d’Hist. Nat., 1816, 108.—Id., Mam., 1820, 224, No. 346.—Gapper, Zodl. Journ., 1835, vol. v. 203.—Swains. & Rich., Faun. Bor. Am., vol. i, 1829, 101.—Murr., Geog. Distr. Mam., 1866, 101.—Jard., Nat. Libr., vol. xvi, 259, pl. xxxiii—Less, Man. Mam., 1827, 191, sp. 513.—Harln., Faun. Am., 1825, 98 —Griff., Anim. King., 1827, vol. v, 174.— Fisch., Syn. Mam., 1829, 213, sp. 31.—Less., Nouv. Tab. Regn. Anim., 1842, 57, sp. 548.—Gerv., Hist. Nat. Mam., 1855, 92. 1842. Lyncus borealis, De Kay, Nat. Hist. N. York, 1842, 50, pl. x, fig 2. 1842. Lyncus canadensis, Gray, Cat. Mam. Brit. Mus., 1842, 46—Id., P. Z. S., 1867, 276.—Id., Cat. Carn. Mam., 1869, 37, sp. 3. 1847. Felis borealis, Temm., Mon. Mam., 1847, vol. 1, 109, App., 251.— Less., Man. Mam., 1827, 184, sp. 490.—Id., Comp. Buff, 1839, vol. i, 411—Waen., Supp. Schreb., 1841, vol. ii, 519.—Blyth, J. A. 8. B , 1842, vol. xi, pt. ii, p. — 1857. Lynx canadensis, Baird, U. 8. P. R. R. Expl. Exp., 1857, vol. viii, 99.—Raf., Am. Month. Mag., 1817, vol. ii, 46—Aud. & Bach., Quad. N. Am., 1849, vol. i, 136, pl. xvii—Jordan, Manual of the Vertebrates, 1878, 16, 2nd ed.—Le Lynx du Canada, Cuv., Ossem. Foss., 1825, vol. iv, 443.—Buff,, Suppl., vol. iii, pl. xliv.— Le Lynx de Mississippi, Buff, Supp., vol., vii, pl. liii. Specific Marks—This lynx is the size of a setter dog. The tail is as short or shorter than the head, its last fifth black above, and extreme end 10 black all round. The feet are large, densely furred in winter so as to con- ceal the pads. Hind feet about nine incheslong. General color grayish hoary with concealed pale rufous, and waved with black, especially on the back; obsolete dark markings on the head; ears with narrow black margin on the convexity, and black pencil of hairs; whiskers chiefly white. This species may be known from the others by its larger size, and relatively longer hair and feet, independent of color marks. It is nearer L. rufus than other American lynxes, but may be at once known by its larger size, fuller fur, larger. and densely furred feet concealing the soles. Its relationship to certain European species, Felis lynz and Felis borealis, is by no means clear. In the summer pelage the fur is much shorter and less dense; the colors are much the same, with, however, more rufous and less gray. The pads on the feet are distinctly visible in summer, not being over- grown as in winter specimens. The following measurements were taken from a specimen in the flesh. INCHES. SE clinics beeper co eke ak Sad wo DOL BAA WEE aK REE GA RR 64 Head and “body sas. esas ccd eecsnigacers aoe anus eeskeeesisceedesae eee sees BAF Tail, vertebrae USP ce et een 4h Mail Wate sce tars vicis clone: wake ecemdae edicts ces ene tccieeeddedage wc Seems DE IM GsTO Ob ae saat sea Sse: ad crs Shae alansemesd Gee wiswivieniad oeiee eecuelecnveaae eae 9 Lynx rurus, (Gm.) Raf. Bay Lynx; WILD CaT; MOUNTAIN CaT; TIGER Cat. 1776. Felis ruffa, Guldenstidt, Nov. Comm. Petrop., xx, 1776, 499. 1788. Felis ruffa, Gmel., Syst. Nat., 1788, vol. i, pt. i,.82, sp. 19.—Schreb., Siugth., 1788, th. iii, 412, tab. cix. B—Desm., Nouv. Dict. d Hist. Nat., 1816, 107.—F. Cuv., Hist. Nat. Mamm., 1828, vol. ii. pl. 141.—Blain., Osteog., 1839, 64, vol. ii, pl. xii—Desm., Mamm., 1820, 225, No. 347.—Guldenst., Voy. de la Venus, t. 9, fig. 2-4 (skull) —Temm., Mon. Mamm., 1827, vol. i. 141.—Less., Man. Mamm., 1827, 192, sp. 514.—Id., Compl. Buff., 1839, vol. i, 411.— Geoff. St. Hil., Voy. Venus, Zodl, 1855, 150, pl. ix —Fisch., Syn. Mamm., 1829, 212, sp. 32.—Less., Nouv. Tab. Régn. Anim., 1842, 57, sp. 549.—Gerv., Hist. Nat. Mamm., 1855, 91—Blyth, Journ. Asiat. Soc. Beng., 1842, vol. xi, pt. ii, 752.. 1829. Felis maculata, Vig. & Horsf., Zool. Journ., 1829, vol. iv, 880.— Less., Comp. Buff., 1839, vol. i, 411.—Id., Nouv. Tab, Régn. Anim., 1842, 58, sp. 553. , 1817. 1817. 1859. 1817. 1867. 1817. 1817. 1820, 1820. 1825. 1827. 1827. 1827. 1859. 11 Lynx rufus, Raf., Am. Month. Mag., 1817, vol. ii, 46—Aud. & Bach., Quad. N. Am., 1849, vol. i, 2, pl. i—Marcy, Expl. Red River, 1852, 200.—Newb., P. R. R. Rep., vi, 1857, 36.—Bd., Mam. N. A., 1857, 90.—Coues, Am. Nat., i, 1867, 287.—All., Bull. M. C. Z., ii, 1871, 168.—Jordan, Manual of the Vertebrates, 1878, 16, 2d ed. , . Lynx floridana, Raf., Amer. Month. Mag., 1817, vol. ii, 46. Lynx rufus var. maculatus, Baird, U. 8. and Mex. B. Sur., 1859, 13.—Id., U. §. P. R. R. Expl. Exp., 1857, vol. viii, 93.—Aud. & Bach., Quad. N. Am., 1851, vol. ii, 293, pl. xlii. Lynx montanus, Raf., Am. Month. Mag., 1817, vol. ii, 46. Lyncus maculatus, Gray, P. Z. S., 1867, 297.—Id., Cat. Carn. Mam., 1869, 38, sp. 8. Lynx awreur, Raf., Am. Month. Mag., 1817, 46, sp. 6—Less., Comp. Buff, 1839, vol. i, 412. Lynx fasciatus, Raf., Am. Month. Mag., 1817, vol. ii, 46.—Baird, U.S. P. R. R. Expl. Exp., 1857, vol. viii, 96.—Suckl., U. 8. P. R. R. Expl. Exp., 1860, vol. xii, 109—Desm., Mamm, 1820, vol. i, 225. Felis montana, Desm., Mam., 1820, 225, No. 349, pl. 98, fig. 2.—Less., Man. Mam., 1827, 194, sp. 522—Id., Compl. Buff., 1889, vol. i, 411.—Harl., Faun. Amer., 1825, 101.—LeConte., P. A. N. 8. Philada., 1854, 9.—Gerv., Hist. Nat. Mamm., 1855, 92. Felis floridana, Desm., Mam., 1820, 225, 350.—Less., Man. Mam., 1827, 194, sp. 528.—Id., Comp. Buff, 1839, vol. i. 412. Felis fasciata, Harl., Fn. Am., 1825, 100.—Swains. & Rich., Faun. Bor. Am., 1829, Mamm., 104.—Murr., Geog. Distr. Mam., 1866, 101.—Cuv., Ossem. Foss., vol. iv. 441.—Buff., Suppl., vol. iii, pl. 44.—Less., Man. Mam., 1827, 193, sp., 520.—Coop. & Suck., Nat. Mist. Wash. Ter., 1859, 109.—Less., Comp. Buff., 1839, vol. i, 411.—Fisch., Syn. Mam., 1829, 212.—Less., Nouv. Tab. Régne Anim., 1842, 57, sp. 550. Felis mexicana, Desm., Mam., 225, sp. 351.—Less., Man. Mam., 1827, 194, sp. 524.—Id., Nouv. Tab. Régn. Anim., 1842, 57, sp. 357. Felis mexicana, Desm., Mam., 325, sp. 359.—Less., Man. Mam., 1827, 194, sp. 525.—Id., Comp. Buff., 1839, vol. i, 411. Felix carolinensis, Desm., Mam., 231.—Less., Man. Mam., 1827, 195, sp. 527.—Id., Comp. Buff, 1839, vol. i, 415. Lynx rufus var. maculatus, Baird, U. S. and Mex. B. Sur., 1859, 13.— Id., U. S. Pacific R. R. Expl. Ex., 1857, vol. viii, 93.—Aud. & Bach., Quad. N. Am., 1851, vol. ii, 293, pl. xcii. 12 1867. Lyncus fasciatus, Gray, P. Z. S., 1867, 276.—Id., Cat. Carn. Mam., 1869, 38, sp. 6. 1869. Panthera concolor maculata, Fitz., Ditzg. Akad. Wiss. Wein, 1869, lix, 636. Specific Characters—Fur moderately full and soft. Above and on sides pale rufous overlaid with grayish, the latter color most prevalent in winter. A few obsolete dark spots on the sides, and indistinct longitu- dinal lines along the middle of the back. Color on the throat like the sides, but paler. Beneath, white spotted. Inside of fore and hind legs banded. Tail with a small black patch at the end, with indistinct sub- terminal half rings. Inner surface of ears black, with a white patch. This species has a very wide range, and varies much both with place and season. Those from different localities vary much at the same time. The synonomy of Lynx rufus covers the three sub-species into which Dr. Coues thinks this species is separable—Lynz rufus, var. rufus, the common bay lynx, which reaches from the Atlantie to the Pacific coast | throughout nearly the whole breadth of the United States; Lynx rufus, var. fasciatus, of the moist north-west coast of Oregon and Washington Territory, is a heavily colored red form; lastly, var. maculatus, the pro- fusely banded and spotted form from Florida, described by Prof. Baird. In one specimen the length of head and body was 28? inches, tail 7 inches. Another, 27 inches in length, was 154 inches high at the shoul- der, and 64 inches from heel to end of hind foot. With reference to the variation of L. rufus in size and color, Prof. Baird states that in many of our animals of wide distribution there appear to be, as in this case, sev- eral races as far as color and dimensions are concerned, in particular species; skulls of the same sex and relative age being different in size. This is particularly true with the cats, deer, bears, and raccoons, and as a general rule the farther south we go the smaller the species. Northern skins of wild cats have the hair longer and softer through the year than southern, while, as in the deer, the hair will have a reddish or bay tinge, replaced by grayish in the winter. Judge Burgoyne informs Mr. Langdon that wild-cats were occasionally taken in the vicinity of Cincinnati as late ag 1814. It is scarcely likely that any remain to the present time, although they are often found-in Eastern Kentucky and Tennessee. FAMILY CANIDA. The Dogs are digitigrade Carnivora, with blunt, non-retractile claws. The feet are, apparently, all four-toed, but the foremost ones have a rudi- mentary thumb higher up, to which a claw is attached (sometimes want- ing). The dentition is typically i. $3; cb; pm. 39; m. 3.342. 13 This family is connected to the cats by the hyenas, of which no species occur in North America. Indigenous species of dogs occur in all habita- ble regions, and the domestic dog thrives wherever man has a foothold. The dogs are separated from the cats externally by the long, sharp muzzle, small eyes, long hair, bushy tail, contracted belly, and pointed, erect ears; they are related to-the hyenas by the blunt, non-retractile claws, by their digitigrade feet, and general appearance. The Canidx vary much in size from the largest wolves to the California | coast fox, scarcely larger than the domestic cat. There are two groups or sub-families of North American Canidz, the wolves, including the domestic dog, and the foxes. These groups are related by the South American foxes—a fox-like wolf directly interme- diate between the fox and wolf forms of Europe and North America. In the wolves the tail is short, the pupil circular, and the median upper incisors very distinctly lobed on each side; the post-orbital process of the frontal bone is triangular, convex on its upper surface, with its point below the plane of the inter-orbital space. Sub-family Lupine. In the foxes the tail is bushy, the pupil elliptical, and the whole form more slender; the upper incisors are scarcely lobed, and the post-orbital process of the frontal bone bent but little downward, the anterior edge turned up; a longitudinal shallow pit or indentation at its base. Sub- family Vulpine. — The South American fox-like forms (Lycalopex and Pseudalopex of Bur- meister) have the circular pupils and wolf-like character of the post- orbital process, but their tails are even larger than those of the true foxes, reaching to the ground. Prof. Baird, therefore, includes them in the sub-family Lupine. KEY TO THE GENERA OF CANIDZ. * Post-orbital process of the frontal bone very convex and curving downwards, with little or no depression or indentation in its upper surface; pupil circular ; tail com- paratively short; upper incisors distinctly lobed on each side. . . . Canis. ** Post-orbital process bent but little dowuwards, the anterior edge turned up; a longi- tudinal shallow pit or indentation at its base; tail long and bushy: pupil ellipti- cal; body more slender; upper incisors scarcely lobed. , + Tail with soft far and long hair uniformly mixed; muzzle long; temporal crests com- ing nearly in contact. 7 A i a f . VULPES, tt Tail with a concealed mane of stiff apis) witliont soft fur intermixed ; muzzle shorter; temporal crests always widely separated. - 7 eo HG Uxnocyron. 14 Genus Canis (Lin.) Canis, Lin., Systema Nature, I, 1735. The generic characters of Canis are included in the description already given. To separate Canis from the South American fox-like wolves, Lycalopex and Pseudalopex, of Burmeister, we have the completely cir- cular pupil, large size, and short tail, as opposed to the smaller size, longer tail, slender muzzle, and pupil varying from round to elliptical of the South American genera. CANIS LUPUS OCCIDENTALIS. (——.) ——. AMERICAN WOLF; TIMBER OR BurraLto WoLF; LOBO OF THE MEXICANS; WHITE, GRIZZLED, GRAY AND BRINDLED, RED, Dusky, AND BLACK WOLVES OF AUTHORS. a. White Wolves. 1829. Canis lupus albus, Sabine, Journ., 652 —Rich., F.B. A., i, 1829, 68.— A. & B,, ii, 156, pl. 72. White, pure or washed with yellowish, with or without black-tipped tail. Among the largest of the species. Northerly and alpine. b. Grizzled Wolves. 1857. (C. occidentalis, var. griseo-albus, Newb., P. R. R. Rep., vi, 1857, 37; Coues, Am. Nat., 1867, 288.—C. variabilis, Maxim.—C. griseo-albus, Baird, 104. White, more or less grizzled with gray; large, and rather northerly. An intermediate link between a and c. Gray and Brindled Wolves. C. lupus, of authors.— Lupus occidentalis, Peale, U. 8. Expl. Ex., 1848, 26.—Marcy, Expl. Red Riv., 1852, 200.—Lupus gigas, Townsend, Proc. Phila. Acad. Nat. Sci., 1850, 11,75. Gray, of variable shade and pattern, generally brindled; darker along the dorsal aspect, paler or white below; little or no rufous; medium size, most general distribution. d. Red Wolves. C. lupus, var. rufus, A. & B., ii, 240, pl. 20.—C. occidentalis var. rufus, Bd., 118. Mixed reddish and black, paler below. Small, south- erly, especially Texas. e. Dusky Wolves. C. nobilis, Say., Long’s Ex., 1823, i, 168.-—C. occidentalis, vars. nobilis and meatcanus, Bd., 111,113. Dusky or plumbeous brown, with or without darker muzzle band and leg stripe. Small, chiefly southerly. & f. Black Wolves. C. lupus ater, Rich., F. B, A., 1829, i, 70.—A. & B., ii, 126, pl. 67.— C. occidentalis, var. ater, Bd., 113. Black or nearly so. Small, chiefly southerly, especially Florida. 15 ff Specific Characters—This wolf is the largest of the genus, from 38 to 5 feet long, average about 4; tail 12 to 18 inches; skull 8 to 11 inches, usually 9 to 10; width of skull 4% to 53, generally about 54 inches. Color indeterminate, varying from pure white to grizzled gray and brindled wolves, through mixed reddish and black forms to dusky or plumbeous brown, and even black. The coiors are indicated in the accompanying synonymy by Dr. Coues, who has made six groups of the American wolf, based on the color. The distribution is given in the synonymy. The more usual color, it will be noticed, is the gray, a form of medium size and most general distribu- tion. Should a stray wolf still remain in the hills of Southern Ohio, or occasionally stray over from the mountainous regions of Kentucky, this would be the probable form. The gray wolf is found all over North America to the arctic regions, the others are more local in their range. A pure white is found in the Upper Missouri and in alpine regions, a dusky, blackish, plumbeous wolf in the Lower Missouri region, an entirely red or rufous in Texas, and an entirely black wolf in Florida and the Southern States; these varying conditions of albinism and melanism, from arctic to southern regions, and the diminution in size toward equatorial latitudes, are well marked in this species. The study of the synonymy is instructive, show- ing that a species cannot be properly named and defined until collections have been made from all parts of its range, and careful comparisons made between apparently distinct species. Since the above was written I have the following notes from Mr. Langdon: In a ‘“‘ History of Seneca County, Ohio,” by C. W. Butterfield, published at Sandusky in 1848, I find the following remarks on wolves: ‘Wolf Creek, another tributary of the Sandusky, rises in the south-west part of the county (etc. * * * *), This stream, running through a level country, is somewhat sluggish. It received its name from the circumstance of a great number of wolves for- merly inhabiting the swamps near its source, and the thickets around the wet prairie a little west of its mouth.” The following extract is taken from the ‘Pioneer History of the Ohio Valley,” Hildreth ; 1848, Cincinnati: ‘“‘The wolf for thirty years was a great hindrance to the raising of sheep, and for a long period the State paid a bounty for their scalps. Neighboring farmers often associ- ated and paid an additional bounty of ten or fifteen dollars, so as to make it an object of profit for certain old hunters to employ their whole time and skill in entrapping them. At this period (1848) the race is nearly extinct in the Ohio Company’s lands.” Dr. Kirtland speaks of the wolf as “becoming very rare”—Ohio Geol, Survey, 1838. List of mammals of Ohio. 16 GENus VuLpes. Brisson. To the Sub-family characters already indicated may be added: tail with soft fur and long hair, uniformly mixed; muzzle long; temporal crests coming nearly in contact. These, with the “dissimilarity in color, and a difference in build, easier to remark upon comparison then to express in words, readily distinguish the red fox in any of its pelages from the gray fox.” (Urocyon virginianus.) The American foxes included in this genus are the Arctic Fox (J. la- gopus, Rich); the Swift Fox (V. velox, Aud. and Bach.) of the plains west of Missouri to Oregon; the Large Prairie Fox (V. macrurus, Baird) of the Upper Missouri to plains of Oregon, and the American Red Fox (V. vul- garis pennsylvanicus, (Bodd.,) Coues), which in three well marked color varieties is distributed from the Atlantic to the Pacific. VULPES VULGARIS PENNSYLVANICUS. (Bodd.) Coues. AMERICAN Rep Fox. 1784. Canis vulpes, var. pennsylvanicus, Bodd., Elenchus Anim., 1784, 96 (from Pennant.) 1820. Canis fulvis, Desm., Mamm., i., 1820, 203 (from Pal. de Beauv.). Fr. Cuv., Diet. Sci. 1829. Vulpes fulvus, Rich., Fn. Bor. Am., i., 1829, 91.—Fischer, Syn., 1829, 191._De Kay, N. Y. Fn. i. 1842, 44, pl. 7, f. 1—Aud. & Bach., Quad. N. A,, ii. 1851, 2638, .pl. 87.—Baird, Mamm. N. A., 1867, 123. 1841. Canis (Vulpes) vulgaris, var. fuluus, Wagn., Suppl. Schreber, ii. 1841, 4138. 1875. Vulpes vulgaris pennsylvanicus, Coues, Geolog. and Geog. Surveys West One Hundredth Meridian, Chap. IL, Vol. V. 1875, 52.— Jordan Manual Vertebrates, 1878, 17. The ordinary variety of the Red Fox (V. pennsylvanicus) may be known from its melanotic forms, the Cross Fox (V. deeussatus) and Black or Silver Gray Fox (V. argentatus) by its prevailing color: a bright, clear, yellowish rufous, darker on the shoulders and flanks. The pelage of the Red Fox is long, fine and lustrous. The hair is much silkier and softer than in the Red Fox of Europe (V. vulgaris). The convexity of the ears and out- side of the legs below are of a glossy black; space around the black snout, edges of upper jaw, chin, throat, breast, and narrow belly-line more or ess purely white, as is usually the tip of the tail. The feet are so clothed with long, soft hair that the claws and balls are nearly hidden. The 17 brush is large and full, the distance between the ends of the outstretched hairs 6 to 7 inches. In Northern Ohio, according to Prof. Baird, a variety of the Red Fox is not uncommon in which the long hairs of the body and tail are entirely wanting, leaving the soft, silken fur freely exposed. The colors do not vary from the common variety, except that the red is lighter; there is no black on the tail, or grizzling on the hinder back. Prof. Baird states that this condition of the hair has been observed by him in skins of Canis griseus, from Chili, as well as in many other species. Regarding this peculiar condition of the pelage, Mr. Allen is of the opinion that it is the result of a disease which produces a crisp, woolly condition of the fur much as though it had been singed; hence the common name of “Sampson” or ‘* Samson” foxes. The same author states that in Van Buren and Allegan counties, Michigan, about one-third of all the foxes: taken are of this varicty, and that their skins bring much less in market than those of the common Red Fox; the animal, moreover, is represented as less cunning, and more easily trapped, and has slightly different hab- its from the normal variety. The specimen observed by Prof. Baird was sent him by Dr. Ackley. Whether this variety is still found in the State is not known to the present writer, Dr. Coues regard; the Cross Fox as a “special state of semi-melanigsm” of the coinmmon fox. This variety, common in northern New York, and sometimes as far southward as Pennsylvania and Ohio, receives its name from the presence of a biack cross forwed by a black band along the back crossed by anotheron the shoulder. It shades by varying and almost in- sensible degrees in‘o the Black or Silver-Gray Fox. Complete, or nearly complete, melanism distinguishes the Black or - Silver-Gray Fox, (Canis or Vulpes argentatus, or fulvus var. argentatus of anthors.) The color is auniform, lustrous black, with conspicuously white- tipped tail; more or less of the long hairs of the back and flanks, top and sides of head grayish, silvery at the end, giving a silvered appear- ance to the pelage. The perfectly black pelts are found, chiefly, iu high latitudes. Such pelts are extremely rare, and command a high price in the market; indeed the varying colors determine the value of the pelt, and so are of great commercial importance; they have, however, no classifi- catory significance. ‘While the Cross and Black or Silver Foxes are usually considered as different ‘ varie- ties,’ they are not such, in the classificatory sense of that term, any more than are the red, black, or white wolves, the black marmots, squirrels, etc. The proof of this is in the fact that one or both of the ‘varieties’ occur in the same litter-of whelps from nor- 2 18 mally colored parents. They have no special geographical distribution, although, on the whole, both kinds are rather northerly than otherwise, the Silver Foxes especially so. It does not appear to be ascertained exactly how far the styles of pelage tend to perpetuate themselves; that is to say, in what proportion of cases a cross will produce a cross litter, or a black a black litter; but the inter-breeding of the several varieties, and their purely accidental origin, from parents of the normal coloration are incontest- ible.”—[Coues and Yarrow, Zoél. Ep]., W. 100 Merid., V. 1875, 53.] The same authorities state there is no reasonable question of the specific identity of the American and European Red Fox. The same color variations occur in both. Prof. Baird (Mam. N. A., 1857, p. 180) surmises, from the absence of any fossil remains of the Red Fox in the Carlisle (Penn.) and other bone caves, in which the Gray Fox is abund- antly represented, that there is basis for the somewhat prevalent belief that the Red Fox of Eastern America is the descendant of the European Fox imported and run wild many years ago, as did the horses imported and set at liberty by the Spaniards. This might account for its abundance in settled districts, but scarcely allows time for its universal distribution over acontinent. Coues and Yarrow (Zodl. Expl., W. 100 Merid., V. 1875, 54) think it a more reasonable hypothesis that, with many other Ameri- can mammals, it had an original circumpolar distribution in warmer times, and has spread southward in both hemispheres, developing geo- graphical distinctions of race, but not distinct species. The differences, as observed by Audubon, are all comparative, and not positive. With ample opportunity for comparison, he says the American Red Fox ‘‘is a little the largest; its lega are less robust; its nose shorter and more pointed ; the eyes nearer together ; its feet and toes more thickly clothed with fur; its ears shorter; it has a finer and larger brush; and its fur is much softer, finer, and of a brighter color.” = DIMENSIONS OF ANY OF THE AMERICAN VARIETIES. NOSe!tO;TO0G- OF tail coun. cccicdiewccweuccdusauisenon ee wane beas ce 2-24 feet. Tail to end Of DONGS soc. cana vsmices cecses ca cites secwee os tmcc sees 12-16 inches. Pail tO enol, Nass ccceudecweae sions vawciec cemsiadexiesica eae dere 15-19“ Height Of Gabsace soesen seresiteceedncedes sebesekesekteecuasee ce 2-22 = Height at shoulders ......-22. -200 --- eee cee cee ee een e eee eee 12-13 Skull, in length and width....-.----...---2. 2-2-2 2-20. see eee- 54x3 st Regarding the occurrence of the Red Fox in Ohio, and its taking the place of the Gray Fox, Dr. Kirtland writes as follows: C. (Vulpes) fulvus—‘ The Red Fox was unknown in this region of conntry until the introduction of the white population, and is supposed by many not to have been originally a native of America. It has now become a common and troublesome inhabitant.” 19 U. virginianus.—“ The Gray Fox was formerly very abundant, but it rapidly disap- peared before the advancement of cultivation, and its place is now generally filled by a more cunning and sagacious successor, the Red Fox.”—[Ohio Geol. Surv., 1838.] Of this beautiful animal, Thoreau says: “ His pace is a sort of leopard canter, as if he were in nowise impeded by the snew, but were husbanding his strength all the while; when the ground is uneven the conrse is a series of graceful curves, conforming to the shape of the surface. He runs as though there were not a bone iu his back, occasionally dropping his muzzle to the ground for a rod or two, and then tossing his head aloft when satisfied of his course. When he comes to a declivity he will put his fore feet together and slide swiftly down it, shovjng the snow before him. He travels so softly that you would hardly hear it from any distance. ‘Sometimes you will see the trail (in the snow) of many together, and where they have gambolled and gone through a hundred evolutions, whieh testify to a singular listless- ness in nature.”—[Thoreau’s Excursions—Natural History of Massachusetts. ] Genus Urocyon. Baird. Urocyon, Baird. Mamm.N. A., 1857.— Vulpes, Brisson. Etymology, Greek, oura—tail, and kuon—dog. Type, Urocyon cinereo-argentatus, (Schreb.) Coues. Generic Characters.—Tail with a concealed mane of stiff hairs without any soft fur intermixed; rhuzzle short; temporal crests always widely separated. A supplementary tubercle on the lower sectorial tooth ; under . jaw with an angular emargination below. “Mane-tailed foxes.” Two species; the type and U. litoralis (Baird) of the island of San Miguel, Cal- ifornia. UrocyoN CINEREO-ARGENTATUS. (Schreb.) Coues. Gray Fox. 1778. Canis cinereo-argentatus, Schreber, Siug., ili, 1778, 360, pl. 92 (has actual priority over Erxlebin.)—Erxl., Syst. An., 1777, 576.— Gm., Syst. Nat., i, 1788, 74.—Shaw, Gen. Zodl., i, 1800, 324.—Desm., Mamm., i, 1820, 204 (partim).—Harlan, Fn. Amer., 1825, 90.— Griff, An. Kingd., v, 1827, 148—Godman, Am. Nat. Hist., i, 1831, 280.—Fr. Cuv., Suppl. Buffon, i, 1831—Doughty’s Cab. Nat. Hist., ii, 1832, 145, pl. 14.—Wagn., Suppl. Schreb., ii, 1841, 436 (partly).—Woodh., Sitgreave’s Report Expl. Zuni and Col- orado, 1854, 46. 1778. Canis virgintanus, Schreb., Siug., iii, 1778, 361, pl. 92.—Erxl., Syst. An., 1777, 567.—Gm., Syst. Nat., i, 1778, 74.—Shaw, Gen. Zool., i, 1800, 325.—Harlan, Fn. Amer., 1825, 89.—Griff., An. King., v, 1827, 150.—Rich., F. Bor. Amer., 1829, 96 ( Vulpes.) 1784. Canis griseus, Bodd., Elench. Anim., i, 1784, 97 (Ex Penn.) 1857. Vulpes (Urocyon) virginianus, Baird, Mamm. N. A., 1857, 188. t 20 1875. Uvrocyon cinereo-argentatus, (Schreb.) Coues. Report Geolog. and Geogr. Expl. and Surveys West 100dth Meridian, 1575,56. Jor- dan, Man. Vert., 1878, 17, 2d edition. Specific Characters—Head and body a little over two feet in length : tail rather more than half as long; stiff, with a concealed mane of bristly hairs. Prevailing color mixed hoary and black; convexity and base of ears, side of neck and edges of belly, and more or less of the outer sur- faces of the limbs, rich fulvous or cinamon brown; muzzle banded with black, extending on the chin; lower half of head, tip of chin, and sides of muzzle at end white; tail hoary on the siles, a stripe above, and the tip black; rusty below. The Gray Fox is about as large as the Red Fox. The length is about twenty-eight inches; tail, to end of vertebra, thirteen to sixteea inches, to end of hairs, fourteen to eighteen inches; ears two and a half inches high ; hind foot five inches; skull four and a half to four and two-thirds by two and a third to two and two-thirds inches. This fox is not subject to the remarkable variations of color’already observed in the Red Fox. Different specimens vary in the shade of the grizzled grayish back, exact color-pattera of the black and white on the head, extent and intensity of the fulvous cn the neck, flank and limbs; it is always distinzuisaable by its colors, however, aside from the differ- ences in build, cranium end general appearance. The Gray Fox occurs in Oregon, Texas, and Californias, and with the Red extends from the Atlantic to the Pacific. It is not common in New England, and only accidental in Maice and Canada. It is more southern than the Red Fox, being the prevailing species from Virginia southward. Taking naturally to the woodlands, and shunning the plains, there are, of course, extensive areas on its ordinary parallels where it mav never be met, although prevalent on either side of such treeless regions. Coues and Yarrow (Zoél. Expl. W. 100dth Meridian), from whom the subsequent note on the comparative habits of the Gray and Red is quoted, consider the present species the characteristic fox of Arizona, being much more abundant than the Red. “Sharing vulpine traits with its kind, the Gray Fox has, nevertheless, its peculiarities. It is not a burrowing animal, at least to any great ex- tent; and when it digs, the burrow is simple, with a single entrance. It lies concealed in rank herbage, beneath or inside fallen logs, under par- tially excavated stumps, and similar retreats. This habit is in evident correlation with its woodland range, for, having no such protection as the Red Fox, which takes to the earth any where, it is forced to abide where there are the natural means of concealment just mentioned. This 21 same habit, moreover, causes a certain modification of the animal’s range with the settling of a country; in clearing off forests the Gray Fox is forced to seek elsewhere; although in effect the circumstances that cause removal of one species are precisely those that invite the other, the Red Fox being able to exist in settled regions where the other could find no suitable resorts. It is this that makes the Red a greater nuisance to the farmer: it sticks close to the farm-yard, being forced, in a measure, to thus supply itself, owing simply to its being in more cultivated districts. The Gray Fox subsists more extensively upon the wild game of his habi- tat. Another distinctive feature is the climbing powers of the Gray Fox, much greater than would be expected from an animal with non-retractile claws, and no great ‘‘ hugging” powers. When bard pressed the Gray Fox is treed as regularly as the Red is earthed. The climbing seems to be simply an agile leaping along an inclined trunk, or from bough to bough, though it has been noted that the animal can climb a small trunk ‘by clasping, or even with its claws like a cat or raccoon.” FAMILY MUSTELIDE. The Mustelide are a strictly defined family of carnivorous mammals, of which the Weasels and Martens are the typical representatives. It includes, also, the Skunks, Badgers, and Otters. Species of the family are found in all parts of the earth, excepting the Australian region. The genera’and species are most abundant and differentiated in the Northern Hemisphere (Arctogea), where the group attains its most per- fect development. The most generally distributed and inclusive genus in both hemispheres, is Putorius, the tiue Weasels, although some twenty genera are recognized altogether. The eommereial importance of the family is indicated by the high price set on the pelt of the Otter, Sable, Ermine, and others. In 1868. the Hudson’s Bay Company sold over 100,000 Sables, 73,000 Mink, 14,000 Otters, 6,000 Skunks, 1,100 Wolverines, 1,500 Badgers, 123 Sea Otters. Beside these, many were handled by other companies. They possess other relations to man worthy of observation. Mink and Weasels are destructive to poultry. The foetid liquid secreted by the anal glands of most Mustelinew, is the means of offense and defense in the Skunks, ranking them among the most disgusting and offensive of animals; and they may, moreover, by their bite, occasion one of the most horrible diseases (Rabies mephitica) to which the race is liable. The Wolverine is the worst enemy of the fur hunter, destroying his traps and game. The cruel method of hunting the Badger has added a verb to the language; indeed, if may be said there is scarcely a family of un- 22 domesticated animals of more importance, or whose habits have been more carefully observed. ; The closest affinities of the Weasels are with the Bears, next with the Cats. They stand in the carnivorous series between the Canide and the Urside. In size they are medium or small, ranging from the Wolverine, weighing thirty to forty pounds, to the least Weasel, but six or seven inehes long, and weighing three or four ounces. The feet may be either plantigrade or digitigrade, and, in the Otters, with the toes palmate, adapted forswimming. The feet may be naked or hairy, with or without naked pads; but this does not indicate whether the animal is digitigrade or plantigrade. (Wagner.) Some are strictly carnivorous; the Otters are piscivorous, while others are omnivorous. The anal glands, with which most species are supplied, secrete a feetid liquid, which reaches the maximum of offensiveness in the American Skunks. The diagnostic characters of the family are taken mainly from the molar teeth, and are as follows: Family Characters.—Carnivora, with a single tubercular molar tooth only, on either side of each jaw; the sectorial pre-molar of typical shape (rarely, in Enhydring, with blunt tubercles). Molars 3:3 (in Old World genus Mellivora ++). Feet five-toed plantigrade or digitigrade. Caecum wanting, as in Urside. Sub-families and Distribution —The Mustelide include, according to Dr. Gill, eight sub-families, three of which, namely, Mellivorine, Zorilline, and Helictidinz, are confined tothe Old World. The remaining five sub-families Musteline— Wolverines, Martens, and true Weasels; Mephittnee— the Skunks; Meline—the Badgers; Lutrine—the Otters ; Enhydrineg—the Sea Otter, are neither of them peculiar to North America. Musteline and Lu- tring are of general distribution in both hemispheres; the lone repre- sentative of Enhydrine, the Sea Otter, is found on both coasts of the North Pacific. The Badgers do not occur in South America, but are com- mon in the Old World. The three genera of Skunks found in North and South America are absent from the Old World, but are replaced by the Afri- can Zorilline. Four of the sub-families are represented in Ohio— Musteline, by the Martens and Weasels; Mephiting, by the Skunks; Meline, by the Badgers ; and Lutrine, by the Otters. Of the seven genera and twenty- three species recognized by Professor Baird (Mam. N. A., 1857), Dr. Coues (Mon. N. A. Mus.) admits sixteen species distributed in eight genera. Six species of this family, representing five genera—the Fisher, Mustela pennanti ; the Common Weasel, Putorius erminea ; the Common Mink, Pu- 23 torius vison ; the Badger, Taxidea americana ; the Common Skunk, Mephitis mephitica ; and the Otter, Lutra canadensis—may properly be considered as belonging to the mammalian fauna of Ohio. It is quite possible the Little Striped Skunk, Mephitis putorius, of the southern and south-western States, should be added to this list of Ohio Mustelide. The same may be said of the least Weasel, P. vulgaris, of the northern United States, and North, although the lack of citations from the middle States is nega- tive evidence of the distribution at present accepted. SUB-FAMILIES AND GENERA OF OHIO MUSTELIDA. .* Skull with the cerebral portion comparatively compressed backwards; and with the rostral portion comparatively produced, attenuated, and transversely convex above; anteorbital foramen small and opening forwards; feet with little or no inter- digital membrane (and the species, with few exceptions, not aquatic). + Auditory bulla much inflated, undivided, bulging, and convex forwards; periotic re- gion extending little outwards or backwards; palate moderately emarginated. ¢ Last molar of the upper jaw (m. 1) short, small, transverse (with the inner edge in- flated at its inner angle); sectorial teeth with a single inner cusp; m. 4; first true molar (seotorial) of upper jaw, followed by a second (tubercular) one; toes short, regularly arched, with last phalanges bent up, withdrawing the claws into sheaths. (Sub-family Musteling.) a. Teeth 38; pm. #5 body slender; feet and progression digitigrade; sole densely furry with naked pads; lower first molar with an internal tubercle; pelage long eee soft. . , ‘ . MUSTELA. aa, Teeth 34; pm. 3- 3 ; body slender ; feet digitigrdite; sectorial tooth without ‘borial tubercle; pelage close and short. . ‘ . . Purorius. tt Last molar of upper jaw (m. 1) enlarged and more or less extended longitudinally ; m. 4; toes straight with the last phalanges and claws extended ; claws non-retractile (Sub-family Meling). Body short and stout; tail very short; teeth 32. TaxipEa. + Auditory bulla little inflated, transversely constricted behind the meatus auditorius externus, and thence inwards; in front flattened forwards; periotic region expanded outwards and backwards; palate deeply emarginated (Sub-family Mephitine). Snout pointed ; nostrils lateral; tail long and bushy; fetid perineal glands highly developed ; colors black and white, massed in large areas; teeth 32; pm. $3 MEPHITIS. ** Skull with the cerebral portion swollen outwards and backwards; and with the ros- tral portion abbreviated, high and truncated forwards, and widened and depressed above ; anteorbital foramen enlarged and produced downwards and backwards ; feet with well developed interdigital membrane, and adapted for swimming. (The spe- cies highly aquatic, one—the Sea Otter—marine. ) Teeth, normal, 36 (m. 4; pm. 5 c. % i, $X2) 5 sectorial tooth (pm. ‘) normal, ef- ficient, with an expanded inner ledge ; the other molars sub-musteline ; posterior feet with normally long digits. (Sub-family Lutrine.) True molars large, quadrate ; body stout, elongate, cylindrical; feet full-webbed; muzzle obtuse ; ears small. Lurra, 24 Gexus Mustera. Linn. Etymology—Latin, Mustela, a Weasel. Type, Afustela martes, Linn. < Afusteie, Linn., Syst. Nat., i, 10th ed., 1758. < Vwerrs, Shaw., Gen. Zool., 1,°1800; not of authors. < Galo, H. Smith (fide Gray); not of Storr. = AMoartes, authors after Ray. > Pekania, J. E. Gray, Proc. Zodl. Soc. Lond., 1865. 107. (Type, M. pennant.) > Foina, J. E. Gray, Proc. Zodl. Soc. Lond., 1865, 107. (Type, MM. martes fugorum.) > Charronia, J. E Gray, Proc. Zodl. Soc. Lond., 1865, 108. (Type, JL flavigula. Bodd.) Generic Characters—Dentition: i. $2; ¢ EL; pm. Hi; m. H5—F5— 38. (Same as Gulo; one more pre-molar, above and below on each side than in Putorius.) Sectorial tooth of lower jaw usually with an internal cusp; form moderately stout; claws strong, curved, acute; tail lonzer than head, bushy, cylindrical, or tapering; soles deasely furry, with naked pads ; pelave long nd soft, but not shaggy; whoele-colored, never whiten- ing in winter; progression digitigrade; habits highly arboreal as weil as terrestrial ; not aquatic. The Martens form the connecting link between the Wolverines and Weasels, in the sub-family Mustelina. Two species are confined to North America—the Fisher (Jf pennant?) and the American Sable or Marten (M. americana) ; three species belong to the Old World. All yield furs of great value, and slizht shades of color, having no classificutory value, are recognized by the furriers as distinct species, and the pelts sold at high prices, the most fashionable shade, of course, commanding the highest price. The Martens are agile and graceful in their movements, spend much of their time iu trees ; they are strictly predacious, destroying many small mammals and birds, and even porcupines and raccoons; but are not so ferocious and bloodthirsty as the Weasels, which seem to destroy life without apparent object. MustELA PENNANTI. Erxl. PEKAN; PENNANT’S MARTEN; FISHER; BLAcK Cart. 1777. Mustela pennanti, Erxl., Syst. An., 1777, 470, No. 10 (based on the Fisher of Pennant; for discussion of name, in question of priority over canadensis, Schreber, cf. Bd. op. infra. cit. p. 151)—Zimm., 1777. 25 Geogr. Gesch., ii, 1780, 310, No. 208.—J. Sab., Frank. Journ., 1828, 651.—Griff,Cuv. R. A., v, 1827, 125, No. 354.—Less., Man., 1827, 150, No. 405.—Fisch., Syn. Mam., 1829, 217.—Godm., Am. N. H.,i, 131, 203.—Bd., M. N. A., 1857, 149, pl. 36, f. 1 —Newb., P. R. R. Rap, vi, 1861, 24 —Gilpin, Tr. Nov. Scot. Inst., ii, 1870, 959.— All., Bull. Mion. Acad. Nat. Sci., 1874, 69.—Jordan, Manual of Vertebrates, 1878, 18. Mustela canadensis, var. alba, Rich., op. cit., 54 (“ White Pekan” ; albinism.). 1778. Mustela canadensis, Schreb., Siiug., iii, 1778, 492, pl. 134 (based on 1784. 1800. 1800. 1806. 1827. on the Pekan of Buffon; not M. canadensis of Erxl., which is Putorius vison).—Zimm., Georg. Gesch., ii, 1870, 809, No. 207.— Bodd , Elench. An., i, 1874, 86—Gm., S. N., i, 1778, 95.—Turt., S. N., i, 1806, 59 (nut same name as on p. 57, which is the Ameri- can Oster).—Kuhl, Beitr., 1820, 74.—Desm., i, 1820, 183, No. 284; Ency. Méth., pl. 80,f. 4; Nouv. Dict., xix, 379.—Harl., Fn. Amer., 1825, 65.—Less., Mam., 1827, 149.—Griff., Cuv. R. A., v, 1827, 124, _ No. 353.— Fisch , Syn., 1829, 216.—Rich., F. B A., i, 1829, 52, No. 18.—Rich., Zo6!. Voy. Blossom, 1839, 10*.—Fr. Cuv., Dict. Sci. Nat., xix, 256,—Martin,, P.Z.S , 1833,97 (anat.).—Emmons, Rep. Quad. Mass., 1840, 38.—Wagn., Suppl. Schreb., ii, 1841, 223.—De Kay, N. Y. Zool., i, 1842, 31, pl. 13, f. (skull).—Aud. & Bach., Q. N. A., i, 1849, 307, pl. 41—De Kay, Fifth Ann. Rep. Reg. Univ. N. Y., 1852, 383 pl. (orig. fig.) —Thomps., N. H. Vermont, 1858, 32.—Kenn., Trans. Ill. State Agric. Soc., vi, 1853-4, 578 (1l1.).— Kneel., Proc., Bost. Soc., vi. 1858, 418.—Giebel, Odontog., 36, pl. 12, f. 1; Sdug., 1855, 773.—Maxim., Arch. Naturg., 1861, 229.—Bill- ings, Canad. Geol. and Nat., ii, 1857, 116.—Kneel., Proc. Bost. Soc , vi, 1859, 418 (skeleton).—Hall, Canad. Nat., vi, 1861, 296.— Muxim., Verz. N. A. Siiug., 1862, 43. Mustela melanorhyncha, Bodd., Elench. An., 1784, 88, No. 13 (based on Fisher of Pennant).—Zimm., in Penn., Arkt. Zodl., 1187, 88. Viverra caadensis, Shaw, Gen. Zoél., i, 1800, 429. ’ Viverra piscator, Shaw, Gen. Zoél., i, 1800, 414 (based on Fisher of Pennant). Mustela nigra, Turt., ed. L. S. N., 1, 1806, 60 (Fisher Weasel of Pen- nant.) Mustela piscatoria, Less., Man., 1827, 150, No. 403 (quotes Pennantt, Erxl. with query). : 26 Distribution.—The habitat of the Pekan is approximately between 35° and 65° in wooded districts throughout the greater part of North America. East of the Mississippi it does not occur throughout its prescribed range. As the country has been cleared it has been forced to the distant torests, and is now almost unknown in the Middle States. It was abundant and troublesome in New York as late as 1840, but is now restrictea to the mountains of the State, and to the thinly settled portions. Its remains are found abundantly in the bone caves of Pennsylvania (Baird), and the animal still exists in the mountains of Perry county, north of Carlisle—(Coues). It is rare in Canada, and but two hundred are taken yearly in Nova Scotia. It probably occurs in the Hoosac Moun- tains (Allen), and, according to Dr. Emmons, was found near Stamford, Vermont, as late as 1840. Description.—In its long head, bushy tail and large size the Pekan is more fox-like than musteline in general appearance. It ranges in weight from eight and a half to eighteen pounds, and is often as large as a fox two-thirds grown. The males are larger than the females. When full grown they measure thirty inches from nose to root of tail. Many are but twenty-four inches long, and others are even a third longer. The tail-vertebre are fourteen inches (12 to 16); nose to eye two inches; nose to occiput over curve of head, sixteen and a half inches; distance between tips of ears, seven inches; hind foot, four and a half inches; fore leg, from elbow, six or seven inches; hind leg, from hip, nearly twelve inches. Specimens vary in color with age and season. The belly, legs, and tail are black or blackish brown; the hinder part of the body above is much the same. On the rest of the upper parts there is a mixture, first of of brownish, then of yellowish gray, conspicuous on the shoulders and nape, growing still lighter on the top and sides of the head. These vari- ations are due, mainly, to the long, coarse hairs, which are lustrous black on the tail, except a reddish-gray tinge at the base. This shade extends further along the hair, becoming purer and lighter on the middle back, until, on the shoulders, the hairs have smoky-brown bases and blackish tips, which are overpowered by the intervening brownish-white. The soft under fur is brownish-plumbeous, lighter at the base. Irregular white blotches, even in the darkest specimens, are found on the chest, arm-pits, and between the thighs; the throat may show a few white hairs. The animal is darker below than above; an exception to the usual coloration in this group.. 27 The eyes are large for the genus; the ears are low, but very wide; the muzzle large. The tail is but little shorter than the trunk, bushy at base, tapering rapidly and evenly to an acute tip. The feet are short and stout, armed with sharp claws. There is a naked ball under the end of each of the five digits, and a V-shaped cal- losity on eaeh palm and sole. A tenth pad is found near the outer bor- der of the wrist, far back from the others. This pad is wanting on the hind feet. History and Habits —The name Fisher, applied to this species, as sug- gested by DeKay, may have been given from its propensity to steal the fish used by trappers for bait, or frozen fish laid up for food. It is an appellation of uncertain origin, inapplicable, as the species is not aquatic, and does not fish or eat fish habitually, therefore, Dr. Coues thinks Pekan a better common name, as it does not mislead or perpetu- ate the existing confusion, The Pekan is carnivorous and predacious; prefers meat to fish. If its natural food fails, it takes to a vegetarian diet, feeding freely on beech- nuts. Richardson was informed that “its favorite food was the Canada Porcupine, which it kills by biting on the belly;” also, that it preys much upon Frogs in the summer time. The smaller quadrupeds—Mice, Moles, as well as the Hare, Rabbit, and Grouse—fall a prey to the Fisher; and the closely allied Pine Marten does not always escape. It successfully assaults the Raccoon, so that in some localities the abundance of Raccoons would seem to be dependent on the scarcity of the Pekan. They are nocturnal in their habits, but not so much so as the Foxes. They are very strong for their size; they tear down the wooden traps of the hunter, visiting them regularly, as do the Wolverines, to get the bait. : Unlike the Wolverine, they do not drag off and bury the sticks of the trap, nor are they as cunning, being readily taken in steel traps. When taken young, it is easily domesticated, grows fat, and is as playful asa kitten. The Pekan is stated to breed but once a year, producing two to four young ata litter. It selects for its breeding place the hollow of a tree, having its entrance some thirty or forty feet from the ground. It defends its young savagely. 28 GENUs Putorius. Cuvier. Ety mology—Latin, putor, a stench. < Mustela, or Martes, of some authors. = Putorius, Cuvier, Regne Anim., i, 1817, and authors. = Fetorius, Keys & Blas., Wirbelth. Hur., 1840. > Gymnopus, Gray, Cat. Mamm. Br. Mus., 1842. > Lutreola, “ Wagner,” Gray, P. Z.S., 1865, 117. Type Mustela lutreola, Linn.) > Gale, “ Wagner,” Gray, P. Z. S., 1865, 118. > Neogale, Gray, P. Z.8., 1865, 114. (Type P. brasilienszs.) > Vison, Gray, P. Z.§., 1865, 115. (Type P. vison.) Generic Characters—Dentition: teeth 34; i. 23; ¢. E}; pm. $$; m. 44> sectorial tooth of lower jaw without an internal cusp; size moderate (in it are the smaller musteline species); body slender, cylindrical ; legs short; tail long, terete; ears long, orbicular; pelage usually close and short; usually white in winter in northern species. This genus contains the true Weasels or Stoats (sub-genus Gale), the Ferrets or Polecats of the Old World (sub-genus Putorius proper), the American Ferret (subgenus Cynomyonaz), and the Minks (sub-genus Lu- treola). The most notable difference between this genus and Mustela, is in the dentition, Putortus having one less molar on each side above and below. The size is usually not as great, and the body typically slenderer. PUTORIUS (SUB-GENUS, GALE) ERMINEA. A. & B. SrToaT OR ERMINE; COMMON WEASEL. Etymology of specific name—“ This is alittle beast, lesse than aSquirrell, that hath his being in the woods of the land of Armenia, whereof hee taketh his name.”—Gwillim, ‘ Display of Heraldrie.” Synonymy—General References. 1748. Mustela candida, s. ermineum, Linn., Syst. Nat., eds. 6th and 7th. 1751. Mustela armellina, Klein., Quadrupeds, 63. 1754. Mustela erminea, Linn., Syst. Nat., 12th ed., i, 1766, 68, No. 10.— Erxl., Syst. An., 1777, 474, No. 13.—Schreb., Siiug., iii, 1778, 496, pl. 137.—Fr. Cuvier, Dict. Sci. Nat., xxix, 1823, 250.—Fisch., Syn., 1829, 222.—Bell, Br. Quad., 1837, 148.—Gray, List. Mamm. Br. Mus., 1848, 65. 1788. Mustela erminea, a. xstiva, b. hyberna, Gm., 8. N., i, 1788, 98, Nos. 10 a., 10 b. 1800. Viverra erminea, Shaw, Gen. Zodl., i, 1800, 426, pl. 99. 1827. Putorius erminea, Griff, An. King., v. 1827, 122, No. 345. 49 American References: 1772. Mustela erminea, Forst., Phil. Trans., lxii, 1772, 373.—Harlan, Fn. Amer., 1825, 62.—-Godman, Am. Nat. Hist., i, 1831, 193.—Hall, Canad Nat, and Geo’, vi, 1861, 295. 1851. Austela erminea, var. americana, Gray, P. Z. §., 1865, 111. 1851. Putorius erminea, A. & B., Quad. N. A., ii, 1851, 56, pl. 55.—-Alien, Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., xiii, 1869, 183 —Jordan, Man. Vert., 1878, 18, 2d ed. 1840. Putorius noveboracensis, DeKay, \. Y. Zodl., ii, 1842, 36, pl. 12, f. 2 (winter), and pl. 14, f. 2 (summer).— Emmons, Rep. Quad. Mass., 1840, 45.—Baird, M.N.A., 1857, 166, pl. 36, f.3,<¢kull —Kennicott, Tr. Fil. Stats Agr. Soe., 1853-4, 578—Sam., Ann. Rep. Mass. Agr., for 1861, 1862, 156, pl. 1, f. t. Distrihution—The Ermine inhabits Europe, Asia, and America, ex- tending north to the limit of existence of terrestrial mammals. It ex- tenda south to very nearly the southern border of the United States; no specimens, however, are recorded from the Gulf States, or from New Mexico, Arizona, or Southern California. The range south meets that of P. brasiliensis, which conducts the genus into South America. Specific Character.—The Ermine is about tea inches (8-11) to root of tail; the tail vertebra, two to five, averaging three and a half to four inches. Tail at all seasons bushy, conspicuously black tipped for about two-fifths, generally, of its length. Outstretched hind feet do not quite reach to the middle of the vertebree. In summer, dull mahog»ny or chest- nut brown alone; fall, sulphury-yellow or whitish beneath; edges of upper lip white; in winter, pure white all over,except tinges of sulphur- yellow, patticularly on the belly and hind quarters, and end of tail black. Weight of male, five to eight ounces ; of the female, scarcely four. Relationship.—Dr. Coues, in the “North American Mustelide,” ad- mits six species of Putorius ; P. vulgaris, Least Weasel; P. longicauda, Long- tailed Weasel; P. brasiliensis frenatus, Bridled Weasel; P. nigripes; Black- footed Weasel; P. vison, Common Mink; and the present species, P. erminea. Extralimital species are P. factidus, the well-known “ Fitch ” of commerce, or “ Polecat” (Polish Cat?) of Europe; P. fatidus var. furo, the well-known Hunting Ferret. only recognized in a state of domes- tication ; P. fartidus var. eversmanni, the Asiatic Polecat, possibly the same as P. fetidus. The Ermines of Europe, Asia and America are specifically identical. The author above cited, after a careful review of the three currently 30 recognized species of American Ermines, P. noveboracensis, De Kay, P. richardsoni, Bonaparte (=agilis Aud. & Bach.), and P. cicognant of Bona- parte (= fuscus A. & B.), concludes that the American Ermines are of two forms in size alone, and these grade insensibly into each other; also, that no question of coloration, stoutness of body, shape of ear, furriness of feet, character of pelage, can be considered with reference to specific va- riation, these details depending on fortuitous circumstances of sex, age, season and locality, as merely normal individual variability ; moreover that within certain defined limits neither the length of the animal, of the tail absolutely or relatively to the body, nor length of the black por- tion absolutely or relatively to length of tail, have any value in specific diagnosis. Description of External Characters—The extreme length, cylindrical body, shortness of the limbs, exceptionally long neck, suggests a group of carnivores, fitly called ‘“ vermiform”; these features, taken with the low forehead, flat, triangular head, bent forward upon the uplifted and outstretched neck, and small, penetrating eyes full of cunning, suggests the serpent almost as fully as they do the quadruped. The greatest circumference of the body is little more than half its length; the head is shorter than the neck, bulged at the sides by the masses of temporal and masseteric muscles ; the head, across the ears, is two-thirds its length; the small eyes, glittering with changing hues, are midway of the nose and ear; the nostrils are small and circular ; the gape of the thin-lipped mouth extends to below the eyes; the earg are high above the fur, rounded, furred inside and out; the whiskers are few, the longest exceeding the head; a few siender bristles grow over the eye and on the cheek. The limbs are stout, tapering to the wrist and ankle; the digits are all clawed, the claws sharp, slightly curved, and modérately stout, adapted for climbing, but not effective in the chase; the feet are densely furred or not, according to the season and latitude; the foot is so densely hairy, in boreal specimens, that, as in the Hare, or Ptarmigan, the palmar tubercles are invisible; the pads are ten on each foot, under each toe are (5), four palmar (9), and one at the wrist (10); these may be readily seen in summer or southern specimens. The extremely variable tail ig furred throughout, and has a terminal pencil of black hairs. As to its fur, like that of its group, it increases in softness, fineness, and density toward the north, and in winter in all latitudes. In the summer, and southward, it is thinner, stiffer, and harsh from admixture of long, bristly hairs. In its summer dress, the Ermine illustrates the “bicolor” pattern, the upper parts ranging from a uniform dull yellow- 31 ish-brown to a rich mahogany brown, or mink color. Below, the animal is white, tinged with sulphury-yellow, the chin, throat, and insides of the legs excepted; these being white; the lineof separation between the upper and lower colors is strict, and the shades nearly uniform. Skins taken in spring and autumn show every possible step of the transition, from the perfect winter to the summer pelage, and vice versa. In the winter the animal becomes (with the exceptions already men- tioned) so pure a white as to be-emblematic. Professor Baird, in his description of an arctic form of this group, says, “as an ermine, the em- blem of spotless purity and integrity, I propose to call it (i. e., P. kaneii, Baird) after Dr. Kane.” Much has been written as to the mode of the change from one pelage to the other, both in the Ermine, Arctic Fox, Northern Hare, Hudson’s Bay Lemming, and other animals, some contending that it is by the ac- tual change of color of the existing fur, and that this transition from the summer to the winter color is the result of actual change of temperature, and not merely by the advance of the season. Audubon and Bachman observed a captured specimen, from March 6th to 28th, which, in this period, nearly completed the change from white to summer colors. They report: ‘“ We have arrived at the conclusion that the animal sheds its coat twice a year; i.e, at the period when these semi-annual changes take place.” Dr. Coues concludes that the change is not altogether co- incident witb, nor independent of, the change of coat, but occurs in both ways, temperature being the immediate controlling agent in the trans- formation. Northern animals invariably change color semi-annually ; southern species do not change at all; in intermediate regions the change is partial. Autumnal skins, having the hair white at base and brown at tip, demonstrate the change in existing hairs. “We may safely conclude that if the requisite temperature be expe- rienced at the periods of renewal of the coat, the new hairs will come out of the opposite color; if not, they will appear of the same color, and afterward change.” (Coues.) The changes in color screen the Ermine from enemies, and from its prey also, by assimilation of its appearance with the surroundings; moreover, the animal heat from within is more completely retained by a white than by a dark covering, although not so much warmth is received during direct exposure to the sun’s influence. Winter specimens are white, as a rule, in the northern line of States, and northward. From the southern States no white specimens are quoted. In the inter-region, some may change and others not; and the 32 varying character of successive winters in temperate regions may deter- mine the degree of variance. The generic name of the Ermine (from juteo, to stink) is very appro- priate. Under the influence of fear, anger, or of sexual passion, either sex may emit at pleasure an odor only excelled in extent and penetra- tion by the skunk itself. Special glands; as in mogt of the family, on either side of the anus, just within the verge of the opening, secrete and emit a fluid which, when the anus is slightly everted and the pa- pill in which the ducts of the glands terminate erected, may be spirted several inches in a fine spray. The savages will not eat the flesh, so thoroughly impregnated is it with the foetor. The female is smaller than the male. She brings forth her young, four or five as an average number, from March to June, according to the cli- mate, but ordinarily in April or May. The breeding places are under logs, in piles of rocks, tree stumps, or hollows. A nest described by Pal- las, was in the hollow of a tree. It was very foul. In one compart- ment was a heap of fresh mice and shrews; in a second, a quantity of rejected skins, feet, and tails of these animals. The mother fought courageously for her two iittle ones, followed the captor, and could scarcely be repelled. ; The pelt was formerly one of the exports of Canada. It is in but lit- tle demand at present, not repaying the Hudson’s Bay Company the expense of collecting them. Those taken in Siberia have been chiefly sent to China, Turkey, and elsewhere for vestments, the tat/s being re- served by law as the exclusive perquisite of royalty. Some Indian tribes on the Missouri decorate the regalia of ceremony with the tails, in imi- tation of royal fashion. A vivid idea of the character and habits of the Ermine may be found in the following from Audubon: “Graceful in form, rapid in his movements, and of untiring industry, he is withal a brave and fearless. little fellow. Conscious of security within the windings of his retreat among the logs or heaps of stones, he - permits us to approach him within a few feet, and then suddenly with- draws bis head; we remain still for a moment, and he once more returns to the post of his observations, watching curiously our every motion, seeming willing to claim association as long as we abstain from becoming his persecutor. “Yet, with all these external attractions, this little Weasel is fierce and bloodthirsty, possessing an intuitive propensity to destroy every an- imal and bird within its reach, some of which, such as the American 33 Rabbit, the Ruffed Grouse, and domestic fowl, are ten times its own size. It is a notorious and hated depredator of the poultry-house, and we have known forty full grown fowls to have been killed in one night by a single Ermine. Satiated with the blood of probably a single fowl, the rest, like the flock slaughtered by the wolf in the sheepfold, were destroyed in obedience to a law of nature—an instinctive propensity to kill. We have traced the footsteps of this blood-sucking little animal on. the snow, pursuing the trail of the American Rabbit, and although it could not overtake its prey by superior specd, yet the timid Hare soon took refuge in the hollow of a tree, or in a hole dug by the Marmot or Skunk. Thither it was pursued by the Ermine and destroyed, the skin and other remains at the mouth of the burrow bearing evidence of the fact. We observed an Ermine, after having captured a Hare of ‘the above species, first behead it and then drag the body some twenty yards over the fresh fallen snow, beneath which it was concealed, and the snow lightly pressed down over it, the little prowler displaying thereby a habit of which we became aware for the first time on that occasion. To avoid a dog that was in close pursuit, it mounted a tree and laid itself flat on a limb about twenty feet from the ground, from which it was finally shot. We have ascertained, by successful experiments repeated more than a hundred times, that the Ermine can be employed, in the manner of the Ferret of Europe, in driving the American Rabbit from the burrow into which it has retreated. In one instance, the Ermine employed had been captured only a few days before, and its canine teeth were filed in order to prevent its destroying the Rabbit; a cord was placed around its neck to secure its return. It pursued the Hare through all its windings in its burrow, and forced it to the mouth, where it could be taken in a net or by the hand. In winter, after a snow storm, the Ruffed Grouse has a habit of plunging ato the loose snow, where it remains at times one or two days. In this passive state the Ermine sometimes detects and de- stroys it. “ Notwithstanding all these mischievous and destructive habits, it is doubtful whether the Ermine is not rather a benefactor than an enemy to the farmer, ridding his granaries and fields of many depredators on the product of his labor, that would devour ten times the value of the poultry and eggs which, at long and uncertain intervals, it occasionally destroys. A mission seems to have been assigned it by Providence to “lessen the rapidly multiplying number of mice of various species, and other small rodents. “The White-footed Mouse is destructive to the grains in the wheat- fields and in the stacks, as well as the nurseries of fruit-trees. Le Conte’s 3 34 Pine Mouse is injurious to the Irish and Sweet potato crops, causing more to rot by nibbling holes in them than it consumes, and Wilson’s Meadow- mouse lessens our annual product of hay by feeding on the grasses, and by its long, tortuous galleries among their roots. “Wherever an Ermine has taken up its residence, the mice in its vicinity for half a mile around have been found rapidly to diminish in number. Their active enemy is able to force its thin, uniform body into burrows; it follows them to the end of their galleries, and destroys whole families We have, on s:veral occasions, after a light snow, followed the trail of this weasel through fields and meadows, and witnessed the im- mense destruction which it occasioned in a single night. It enters every hole under stumps, logs, stone-heaps and fences, and evidences of its bloody deeds are seen in the mutilated remains of the mice scattered on the snow. The little Chipping or Ground Squirrel, Tamias lysteri (sc. striatus) takes up its residence in the vicinity of the grain-fields, and is known to carry off in its cheek-pouches vast quantities of wheat and buckwheat to serve as winter stores. The Ermine instinctively discovers these snug retreats, and, in the space of a few minutes, destroys a whole family of these beautiful little Tamix; without ever resting awhile until it has consumed its now abundant food, its appetite craving for more blood, as if impelled by an irresistable destiny, it proceeds in search of other objects on which it may glut its insatiable, vampire-like thirst. The Norway rat and the common house mouse take possession of our barns, wheat-stacks and granaries, and destroy vast quantities of grain. In some instances the farmer is reluctantly compelled to pay even more than a tithe in contributions towards the support of these pests. Let, however, an Ermine find its way into these barns and granaries, and there take up its winter residence, and the havoc which is made among the rats and mice will soon be observable. The Ermine pursues them to their farthest retreats, and.in a few weeks the premises are entirely free from their depredations. We once placed a half domesticated Ermine in an out-house, infested with rats, shutting up the holes on the outside to prevent their escape. The little animal soon commenced its work of destruction. The squeaking of the rats was heard throughout the day. In the evening it came out licking its mouth, and seemed like a hound after a long chase, much fatigued. A board of the floor was raised to enable us to ascertain the result of our experiment, and an immense number of rats were observed, which, although they had been killed in different parts of the building, had been dragged together, forming a compact heap. “The Ermine is, then, of immense benefit to the farmer. We are of 35 the opinion that it has been overhated, and too indiscriminately perse- cuted. If detected in the poultry-house there is some excuse for destroy- ing it, as, like the dog which has once been found in the sheep-fold, it may return to commit farther depredations; but when it has taken up its residence under stone-heaps and fences in his fields or barns, the farmer would consult his interest by suffering it to remain, as by thus inviting it to a home, it will probably destroy more formidable enemies, relieve him from many petty annoyances, and save him many a bushel of grain.” Pororius (LUTREOLA) vison. (Brisson), Gapp. AMERICAN MINK. Etymology: specific name from Weasel through veso. (Von Martens). 1756. Mustela vison, Briss., Quad., 1756, 246, No. 6 (from Canadian speci- mens, same as described by Buffon and Pennant).—Schreb., Siug., iii, 1778, 463, pl. 1276.—Gm., S. N., i, 1788, 94.—Turt., S. N., i, 1806, 58.—Cuv., R. A., i, 1817, 150 —Harl., Fn. Amer., 1825, 63.— Less., Man., 1827, 148.—Maxim., Reise, i, 1839, 213.—Blainv., Ostéogr., Mustela, pl. 13 (teeth).—Thomps., N. H. Verm., 1853, 31. 1772. Mustela lustreola, Forst., Phil. Trans., lxii, 1772, 8371.—Sab., Frank. Journ., 1823, 652.—Fisch., Syn., 1829, 221 (partly).—Godm., Am. Nat. Hist., i, 1831, 206.—Hall, Canad. Nat. and Geol., vi, 1861, 295. 1777. Mustela canadensis, Erxl., Syst. An., i, 1777, 455 (mixed with syn- onymy of another species, but clearly referable here from the description, which can only apply to the mink. See Bd, M.N. A., text on p. 151.) 1784. Mustela canadensis var. vison, Bodd., Elench. An., i, 1784, 86 (after Buffon.) 1809. Mustela winingus, Barton, Am. Phil. Tr., vi, 1809, 70 (no deser.; St. Louis, Mo.). 1830. Putorius vison, Gapp., Zodl. Jour., v, 1830, 202.—Emmons, Rep. Quad. Mass., 1840, 48.—De K., N. Y. Z., i, 1842, 37, pl. 11, f. 1. (animal), pl. 8, f. 38, A. B. (skull).—Aud. & Bach. Q. N. A, i, 1849, 250, pl. 33.—Kenn., Tr. Ill. State Agric. Soc., 1853-4-5, 578.—Beasley, Geol. Cape May, 1857, 137.—Baird, M. N. A,, 1857, 177, pl. 37, f. 2, 3 (skulls).—Newb., P R. R. Rep., vi, 1857, 42.—Coop. and Suckl, N. H. W. T., 1860, 93, 115.—Billings, Canad. Nat. and Geol., ii, 1857, 448.—Ross, op. cit.. vi, 1861, 29.— Maxim., Verz. Am. Saug., 1862, 62.—Sam., Am. Rep. Masse. Agric. for 1861-2, 157, pl. 1, f. 8.—Gilpin, Tr. N. Scotia Inst., ii, 1870, 36 12, 59.— Ames, Bull. Minn. Acad. Nat Sci., 1874, 69.—Coues and Yarrow, Zodl. Expl. W. 100 Merid., v. 1875, 60.—Allen, Bull. U. 8. Geol. Sur., vol. ii, No. 4, 1876, 326 (skull.)—Jordan, Man. Vert., 2d. ed, 1878, 18. 1806. Mustela minz, Turt., 8. N., i, 1806, 58—Ord, Guthr. Geog., 2d Am. ed, ii, 1815, 291, 298. 1825. Mustela lutreocephala, Harl., Fn. Amer., 1825, 63. 1843. Vison lutreola, Gray, List Mamm. Br. Mus., 1843, 64 (partly).—Gerr., Cat. Bones Br. Mus., 1862, 92 (partly.) 1844. Mustela (Lutreola) lutreola var. americana, Schinz, Syn. Mamm., i, 1844, 347. 1869. Putorius intreolus [Cuv.], Allen, Bull. M. C. Z., i, 1869, 175 (critical) ; ii, 1870, 169 (Florida).—Allen, Pr. Bost. Soc. N. H. » ili, 169, 183.—Jordan, Man. Vert., 1876. 1874. Putorius lustreolus var. vison, Allen, Bull. Ess. Inst., vi, 1874, 54, 59, 62. 1877. Putorius (Lutreola) vison, Coues, Mon. N. A. Mus., 1877, 160. Habitat —North America at large. North to the Arctic coast, but not abundant north of Fort Resolution. Specific Characters.—Larger and stouter than the Stoats; ears shorter ; tail uniformly bushy, nearly as in Mustela; feet semipalmate; color dark chestnut-brown ; tail, and usually a dorsal area, blackish; chin white; the edges of the upper lip rarely also white; the throat, breast, and belly often with irregular white patches; length fifteen to eighteen inches ; tail-vertebre six to eight inches. External Appearance—The Mink differs from the Stoats and true Wea- sels in its larger size, stouter form, and lower ears. It is adapted to its eminently aquatic life, and, indeed, related to the Otters by its close-set and felted under-fur, which readily resists the water, by its half-webbed toes, short ears, and bristly, glossy pelage. Indeed, the specific name Lutreola, or “ Little Otter,” given to the European species by Linneus, is especially appropriate. The dentition is essentially that ot the genus Putorivs. It shares with the Martens the uniformly enlarged, bushy, and somewhat tapering tail, in place of the slender terete tail, with enlarged, bushy tip of the Stoats. It is a true Weasel, however, with thirty-four teeth—not a Marten, which has thirty-eight. The pelage consists of a dense, soft, matted under-fur, intermingled with long, rigid, shining hairs. The gloss is greatest above; on the tail the pristly hairs are in excess. The whiskers are in four or five series, the longest reaching op- posite the occiput. Bristles grow also on the middle of the chin, on the cheeks, over and behind the eyes, and usually on the wrists and ankles. 37 The extremity of the snout is naked and protuberent. The feet are broad, the pads, as in all of the genus, ten on each front, and nine on each hind foot (five isolated pads, one at the end of each digit, five palmar and four plantar). These may or may not be covered with hair, according to season and latitude; ordinarily they are naked. The digits are webbed at base for some distance, particularly the mid- dle ones. The third and fourth fingers are nearly equal, and are the longest ; the second and fifth not so equal, and much shorter ; the first is quite short. The toes of the hind feet have about the same relative pro- portions. ‘ The color runs from a light, dull, yellowish brown to a rich, blackish, chocolate brown. The ordinary color is a rich, dark brown, scarcely or not paler helow than above. The tail is quite blackish ; the white chin is rarely absent. Not positive in extent, but usually present, are the white patches of the under parts, particularly on the chest between the fore legs, and on the belly between the hind legs. The tail is rarely tip- ped with white. Variations in “xternal Appearance.—T wo species of the Mink have been recognized in North America—P. vison, Gapp., and P. nigrescens, Aud. & Bach.: the “ Brown Mink,” and “ Little Black” or “ Mountain Mink,” of hunters and trappers. Audubon and Bachman based nigrescens on the smaller size and darker colors, less deeply palmated feet,'and softer and glossier pelage. This is the variety that furnishes the most valuable pelts, formerly often yield- ing to the hunter from three to, five dollars. There is probably no fur which so nearly approaches the famous Sable of Russia, as the northern Black Mink. As with most furs, the caprice of fashion determines the value, the price of this skin increasing tenfold in a decade. Professor Baird admitted the Little Black Mink as a distinct species “with great hesitation,” not being able “to make such examinations and comparisons as satisfy me of the difference.” Professor Coues concludes, from results of the examination of numer- ous specimens in the Smithsonian Institution, from all parts of North America, that the Black Mink does not require formal recognition, being simply one stage of individual variation, shading by insensible degrees into the ordinary form, so that it is impossible to set any line of demar- cation between “ P. nigrescens” and the Common Mink. That the small blackish varieties are found breeding, has no weight in specific diagnosis, as they grow in stature some time after being sex- ually mature. Under three years old, the fur, in season, is very hand- some, often almost a pure black, with a thin and pliable skin of almost 38 papery texture. With age the skin thickens and toughens, and the _ pelage grows rusty. The “Little Black Mink,” moreover, is not characteristic of any cir- cumscribed faunal area. With reference to the specific difference between P. lutreola, of the Oid World, and P. vison, Dr. Coues has given the following comparative diag- nosis : P. lutreola—Back upper molar small, quadrate, transverse, the inner moiety scarcely longer than the outer (fide Gray); averaging smaller; upper Jip normally white. P. vison.—Back upper molar large, with great constriction across the middle, making an hour-glass shape, the inner moiety of which is nearly twice as large as the outer [forty specimens seen]; averaging larger; upper lip normally dark. Mr. Allen (Bull. Mus. Comp. Zodl., i, 1869, pp. 175-177) asserted, re- garding the sub-genus Lutreola, that “we have again but one circumpolar and widely dispersed species, with possibly two continental or geograph- ical races.” Examination of the molar teeth and skull afterward satisfied him that, while externally the form cannot be specifically dif- ferentiated, they are in fact distinct species. The Siberian Mink, P. sibericus, is the remaining Old World species. History and Haits.—The history of the Mink begins prior to the bien- nialnomenclure. It is noticed, in Smith’s Virginia, 1624, as the “ Mink”; as the “Minx” (Lawson, Carol, 1709); as the “Otay” (Sagard-Théodat, Hist. Canad , 1636); asthe Foutereaux (La Hontan, 1708, and of the French Canadians). The term vison, generally used since Buffon as its specific title, was applied by him in 1765 toa Canadian specimen in M. Aubry’s museum, probably the same on which Brisson and Pennant based their descrip- tions. Dr. Coues ingeniously suggests that the identity in form of Mink and Minz, may be more than fortuitous; Minz, formerly the name of a female puppy, subsequently signified a pert, wanton girl, the forward, prying, and spiteful nature of the animal in question gives a color to the relationship of the terms. Since the early authors mentioned, the Mink has appeared in the writings of systematic authors, and has furnished material for several nom- inal species (see synonymy), which have occasioned but little confusion so definite are the zodlogical characters of the animal. Authors, mistak- in; the number of its teeth (34) have placed it in Mustela, teeth 38. Its peculiarly aquatic nature leads it to seek well watered regions; hence in the dry interior regions they are collected in a few places instead of being uniformly dispersed, so, where found, their numbers are exaggerated. Richardson found the Mink on the Mackenzie at 66°, and Audubon states that he has seen it “in every State in the Union.” 39 Its prime character, as compared with its congeners, is its amphibious mode of life. It is as absolutely aquatic in its nature as the Otter, Beaver or Muskrat. It is perfectly at home in the water, which it frequents as much as the land, imitating so perfectly the motion of the Otter as to suggest a small specimen of that species. The body is submerged, the end of the nose appearing at times. It remains long under water, seek- ing its favorite food, frogs, molluscs, crawfish, fish and reptiles. It has not the insatiable propensity to destroy life so characteristic of the Er- mine, not killing, as a rule, more than it eats. Unlike the Ermine, the Mink is not a good climber, and most birds are safe from its attacks. It is detested by the farmer because of its frequent visits to the poultry- yard in search of eggs and chickens. It visits the same yard repeatedly, killing one or two fowls, and sometimes making off with an entire brood of young chickens; it is not given, however, to the wholesale slaughter- ing common with the Ermine. It destroys the Rabbit, and not unlikely the Muskrat; it is the enemy of our native rats and mice, the Arvicolz, Hesperomys, Sigmodon and Neotoma, and when tamed the Mink is an ex- cellent ratter, rapidly exterminating these troublesome pests; rats will not fight them, but flee at their scent, and if caught yield at once to the Mink, which severs the vessels of the throat so quickly and perfectly as to be scarcely observable. The Mink is easily taken, in either steel-traps or dead-falls; it is very tenacious of life, living many hours under the pressure of a log which presses its body nearly flat. Caught by the leg, it makes no intelligent effort to free itself, but in its senseless fury bites and lacerates the part beyond the grip of the trap. It champs the iron in its rage until its teeth are broken. “The countenance of the Mink, with its short ears, small eyes, piggish snout and formidable teeth, is always expressive of the lower and more brutal passions, all of which are intensified at such times.” The Mink is frequently tamed, and becomes ordinarily gentle and tractable, but is given to outbursts of anger; at such times it is no re- specter of persons, but bites miscellaneously. Accounts of their quasi- domestication may be found in “Forest and Stream,” (October 22, 1874, and July 2, 1874.) Mr. Resseque, of Verona, Oneida county, N. Y., ae a wild, female Mink in 1867, which proved so prolific that his stock has, on some occa- sions, amounted to ninety individuals, besides many sold from time to time for “ratters.” He finds a ready market for them at $30 per pair. Messrs Phillips and Woodcock, of Cancadea, N. Y., breed the Mink for its fur. The expense of feeding is but nominal, and the profits are con 40 sidered lucrative; one Mink, with her increase, is regarded by these parties as equal to the avails of a cow. These ‘‘ Minkeries” are interesting to the Zodlogist, aside from their novelty, as from them is gained some positive information regarding the reproduction of the species. In the minkery the sexes are kept separate, except in March, the rutting season in a state of nature. The females all come in heat within ten days, and continue about four. The females reproduce when one year old. The gestation scarcely varies twelve hours from six weeks, and occurs but once each year. The litters run from three to ten; the young are blind for the first five weeks. They are light colored, hairless, and about the size and shape of a little finger. One or the other sex predominates in number in each litter. The females attain their growth in ten months; the males require a year and a half. Taken when the eyes are open, kept from the mother and their mates, they are easily tamed; they are mischievious, finding food by their sharp scent not intended for them ; they are inordinately fond of bathing, entering any open vessel about the house, and drying themselves by rolling in the nearest fabric at hand. Minks do not burrow, but avail themselves of the holes of the Musk- rat and other animals. In the ‘‘Minkery” the nest of the female was formed of grass, leaves or straw, with a lining of her own fur firmly com- pacted. The opening just admits the dam, and is provided with a de- fiected curtain which covers the entrance. They do not climb a smooth surface but ascend where it is rough enough for a nail-hold. The effluvium of the scent-bags is not baneful enough to rout a deter- mined enemy, 48 in the case of the skunk; it belongs to the class of the musky odors not disagreeable in small quantities to most people. Its service is, evidently, to attract the sexes; both sexes possess the secreting glands. Jike the castoreum of the trappers, it is used to in- crease the efficacy of their bait. Its full strength is tested in taking the Mink from the trap; at such times the degree of fetor is only surpassed by that of the skunk. Genus TaxipEa. Waterhouse. >< Ursus, pt., of Schreber. <. Meles taxus, of authors referring to Am. Badger. = Tasxidea, Waterh., Proc. Zool. Soc. London, vi, 1838, 154; Transac- tions Zodl. Soc. Lond , ii, pt. v, 1841, $43.—Baird, Mamm. N. A , 1857, 200; and of late authors generally. Generic Characters.—Dental formula: i. $3; ¢. +}; pm.23; m. :i—1é— 41 34; body extremely stout, squat, and clumsy, owing to great depression ; tail short, broad, and flattened ; pelage loose ; coloration diffuse ; fore claws extremely large, highly adapted for digging; habits thoroughly terres- trial and fossorial; back upper molar a right angle triangle, with hypo- thenuse postero-external ; back upper pre-molar similar in siza and shape, but the hypothenuse postero-internal; back under pre-molar with two tubercles ; anterior under molar comparatively small, not dilated behind, mostly opposing the back upper pre molar (instead of the upper molar as in Meles); cerebral portion of skull depressed, cuneiform, very wide across the flaring occipital crest; the inter-mastoid diameter nearly equalling the inter-zygomatic; sides of the brain case straightened and strongly convergent anteriorly; bony palate, reaching half-way to ends of pterygoids; bulle auditoria at a maximum of inflation, impinging behind upon paroccipitals; condyles of jaw often locked in the glenoid; coronoid of jaw erect, pointed, its posterior edge angulated by the meet- ing of two straightish lines. : This genus is confined to North and Middle America. There are three other well marked genera in the sub-family Meline : the European Meles, the Asiatic Mydaus, and Arctonyx. In all the genera the perineal glands are moderately developed, and there is a peculiar sub-caudal pouch. TAXIDEA AMERICANA. Baird. AMERICAN BADGER. 1778. Ursus taxus, Schreb., “Siug.; iii, 1778, 530, f. 142, B. (After Buffon).” 1784. Meles taxus var. americanus, Bodd., Elench. Anim., i, 1784, 136. 1787. Meles americanus, Zimm., Penn. Artische Zcél., i, 1787, 74. (Quotes Boddaert.) 1788. Ursus labradorius, Gm., 8. N., i, 1788, 102, n. 7—Kerr., 8. N., i, 1792, 187.—Shaw, G. Z., i, 1800, 469, pl. 106.—Turt., S. N., i, 1806, 63. 1796. Meles labradoria, Meyet, “ Zoél. Arch., ii, 1796, 45.”—J. Sab., App. Franklin’s Journ., 1823, 649 (compared with European).—Harl.,, Fn. Amer., 1825, 57.—Griff., An. Kingd., v, 1827, 116 (“ labra- dorica”’).—Less., Man., i, 1827, 141, No. 372 (“ labradorica”).— Hisch., Syn., 1829, 151.—Rich., F. B. A., i, 1829, 37, No. 12, pl. 2. —Godm., Am. Nat. Hist., i, 1831, 179.—Rich., Zodl. Beechey’s Voy., 1889, 4—Wagn., Suppl. Schreb., ii, 1841, 182 —DeKay, N. Y. Zoél., i, 1842, 27.—Schinz, Syn., i, 1844, 815 (“labradorus”). —Aud. & Bach., Q. N. A, i, 1849, 360, pl. 47.—Bd., Stansbury’s Rep., 1852, 311—Kenn., Tr. Illinois Agric. Soc. for 1853-4-5, 578.—Giebel, Saug., 1855, 761 (‘‘labradorius”).—Hall, Canad. Nat. and Geol., vi, 1861, 294 (“labradoricus’’).—Maxim., Arch. Naturg., 1861, —; Verz. Siiug., 1862, 33. 42 1823. Taxus labradoricus, Say, Long’s Exp., i, 1823, 261, 369. 1838. Tasidea labradoria, (?) Waterh., P. Z. 8., vi, 1838, 154; T. Z..8., ii, 1841, 343, pl. 59 (may be the other sub-species). 1842. Tasidea labradoria, H. Smith, Nat. Lib., xiii, 1842, 310.—Gray, List. Mamm. Br. Mus., 1848, 70.—Baird, M. N. A., 1857, 745 (Expl. of pls.).—Gerr., Cat. Bones Br. Mus., 1862, 99. 1857. Tasxidea americana, Baird, M. N. A., 1857, 202, pl. 36, f. 2—Newb., P. R. R. Rep., vi., 1857, 45 (habits).—Coop , N. H. W. T., 1860, 77.— Suckley and Gibbs, ibid., 117—Hayd., Trans. Am. Philos. Soc., xii, 1862, 184 (upper Missouri country).—Gray, P. Z. 8., 1865, 141; Cat. Carn. Br. Mus., 1869, —.—Coop., Am. Nat., ii, 1868, 529 (Montana).—Stev., U. S. Geol. Surv. Terr. for 1870, 1871, 461.—Allen, Pr. Bost. Soc. N. H., xiii, 1869 (published February, 1870), 183 (Iowa, still numerous) ; Bull. Ess. Inst., vi, 1874, 46 (Kansas), 54 (Colorado), 59 (Wyoming), 63 (Utah); Pr. Bost. Soc., xvii, 1874, 38—Ames, Bull. Minn. Acad. Nat. Sci., 1874, 69 (Minnesota).—Coues and Yarrow, Zvdl. Expl. W. 100 Merid., v, 1875, 63.— Allen, Bull. U. S. Geol. and Geogr. Surv. Terr., vol. ii, No. 4, 1875, 330 (skull).—Jordan, Manual of the Vertebrates, 1878, 19.—Coues, Mon. N. A. Mus., 1877, 263. Distribution.—In 1858, Professor Baird gave the habitat of the Badger as Iowa and Wisconsin to the Pacific coast, and from Arkansas to 49° North latitude. There is now no doubt that the animal formerly ex- tended eastward to Ohio. Says Dr. Coues (North American Mustelide) : “A letter addressed by Mr. Edward Orton, not long since, informs me of its occurrence near Toledo, in that State, about twenty years previously, and of its extinction there.” The fact of the former occurrence of the Badger and the present occur- rence of the Gray Gopher (Spermophilus franklint), is of no little interest, as it extends the distribution of these strictly prairie mammals to the forest regions of the eastward. The writer recalls the capture of a Badger, in 1857, in Kankakee county, Illinois. Mr. Kennicott has the species among the Mammals of Illinois, in 1853-54; and Mr. Allen, writing in 1866, says this species is probably nearly as numerous as for- merly.” The prairie-like character of Northern Indiana is continued into Ohio, and should be favorable to the existence ot the Badger and Spermophiles ; and while these animals are eminently characteristic spe- eies of the central, treeless regions of the United States, where they attain their greatest abundance, there is no apparent necessity for doubt- ing the former occurrence of the Badger and present habitat of the Gray Gopher in Northern Ohio. It is scarcely likely that the Gopher was ac- 43 cidentally introduced about Middletown, Ohio, as it has been in New Jersey; or that the Badgers reported to Dr. Coues by Mr. Orton, were escaped members of some traveling menagerie, as in the case of the Texas Civet Cat, Bassaris astuta, recently reported from a locality in Ohio, On the contrary, the eastward range in the United States, to Michigan, Illinois, Indiana, and Ohio, of such prairie species, may naturally be accounted for by the general similarity of soil, altitude, and flora of the various regions considered. Specific Markings.—The badger is about two feet to root of tail, which is six inches; the head is about five and a half, and the longest fore-claw one and a half inches. The body-coloration above is a grizzle of blackish, with white, gray, or tawny, or all of these; below, uniform whitish, shaded, or not, with gray or tawny. Top of head darker than other upper parts, with a me- dian white stripe; sides of head below the eyes, and its under surface white, with a dark patch below the ear; limbs blackish. This animal is at once recognized by its stout, thick-set form, flattened, conoidal head, short limbs and tail, broad, flat feet, and enormous fore- claws. The head has short, close, coarse hair, except the black nasal pad. The ears are low, rounded and broad. The eye is small, and high up; it is a little back of the angle of the mouth. The digits are short, and apparently consolidated above, but showing five closely, appressed oval pads below; they are shorter than the claws they bear. The second and fourth are sub-equal, and longer than the first and fifth, which are mere claw-bearing balls. The back of the hand is hairy to the claws. There is a single large, irregular palmar pad, separated by a deep furrow from the closely apposed digital naked bulbs. The claws are compressed, arched, with rounded ridge and short edge underneath, blunted with use. The three middle ones are about equal in length, longer and stouter than the lateral ones; these last are sub-equal, and reach about half-way to the ends of the middle claws; they are more compressed and weaker; the inner is quite short, thin, and falcate. Their strong-clawed fore-feet adapt them to their eminently fossorial habits. Tbe hind-feet are much like the front, but are. decidedly smaller, par- ticularly the claws. The foot is about four times as long as broad, hairy above and below more than half-way from the heel to the ends of toes. The claws are less compressed than in front, and are not, like the fore- claws, sharp edged along the median line, but are deeply excavated be- neath, sometimes so much as to be simply a thin shell of horn, the edges of which unite only at the base of the claw. The short, broad tail meets the tapering body much as in the Porcupine, not being sharply 44 separated at its base from the body; the long, coarse hair of the body covers it thickly; the end is obtusely rounded. The colors vary greatly .With age, season or condition of pelage, from the pattern already given ; this variation is mostly in the relative amounts of the whitish and grayish shades which produce the grizzle. The color-markings of the head are quite uniform; the top is dark-brown, or blackish, decreasing ‘in intensity and purity from the snout to the nape, where it blends with the grayish from behind. This dark top area is split by a sharp white or whitish median stripe from snout to nape; this stripe is constant, though varying in length and width. The extreme muzzle is dark on the sides; the white of the chin and throat extends up opposite the canines to the white ears, only interrupted by a dusky patch anterior te the ear. The feet are dark brown or blackish, the claws, especially the front, light colored. The body-colors vary under climatic influences from the whitish or dirty, yellow-tinged specimens from the dry, inte- rior region, to the fulvous or tawny-tinged specimens, mixed with much nearly pure black, from the well watered regions of the Pacific slope and . eastern border of the great central plateau; these two forms grade in- sensibly intv each other. None of the specimens here described have the median white stripe continued back of the nape, as in the Mexican badger (T. americana, var. berlandieri, Gray), which has the white dorsal stripe extending, tuough sometimes interrupted, from the nose to the tail. History —The early history of the Badger is involved with the Euro- pean species, Meles taxus, and with the Woodchuck, Arctomys monaz, by Kalm, and with an Albino Raccoon, the Meles alba of Brisson. Buffon doubted if the Badger inhabited America. Boddaert, in 1784, designated it as Meles taxus, var. americana. Zimmerman adopted the name M. ameri- canus, which bas priority, although not generally used until formally adopted by Prof. Baird, in 1857. The Badger was described by Say, in 1823, as Taxus labradoricus. Sabine called attention to the difference be- tween the European and American species the same year, although the establishment of the American genus, Taxidea, was lett to Waterhouse, in 1838. Perinzal Glands —The peculiar organs of the perineum and sub- caudal region have not been specially studied in the American Badger, but have been in the European species; it is not likely there is any essential difference in these features between the two. I give here the results of M Chatin’s investigations, as compiled by Dr. Coues: “The anal glands are of the normal, musteline type, secreting a viscid, and extremely fetid liquid, of a rosy-yellow color. The secretory portion 45 is as in allied species, the center having a large reservoir lined with a brownish membrane, as in other carnivores. “The Sub-caudal Glands and Pouch.—In front of the insertion of the muscular band, which attaches the rectum to the sacro-cocygeal bones, is a deeply bilobate mass, really a single gland, having but one recepta- cle for the follicular secretion. This large, central pouch is abundantly provided throughout its surface with short, stiff, brownish hairs. This sac is distended with a yellowish, fetid substance, mixed with numerous hairs, like the viverreum of the Civet; this pouch is continuous, with the pocket-opening under the tail, being, indeed, part of one and the same cavity. In the possession of the central cavity clothed with hairs, and the bilobation of the gland, the sub-caudal glands are analogous to the scent-bags of the Civet; but in the Badgers the gland is always between the tail and the anus, and not between the genitalia and the anus, as in the Viverra. They differ, moreover, in the nature of the secretion, and, to a certain extent, in histological structure.” Habits—The Badger lives altogether in burrows in the ground. The continued excavation of the earth by these animals, in search of food, and in forming its burrows, undermines and honeycombs the ground so completely, in many regions, as to form the chief obstacle to progression by wagons or on horseback. Its. whole structure adapts it to a subterranean life, which it follows so closely and secretively that many points in its economy are not yet _ fully known; others are inferred rather than proved. One may travel for weeks in the Badger country and rarely see one, or at the best catch a glance as they scramble into the nearest hole. The Badger has few enemies, and, as a consequence, is very abundant. They are stout enough to ward off Wolves and Foxes. No indiginous animal is known to prey habitually upon them. Their immunity from danger, dependent on their physical prowess, impregnable nature of their retreats, and abundance of their food insures the perpetuation of the species in all unsettled portions of their range. They prey upon small quadrupeds for their staple diet; the nimble Rodents are driven to their retreats, which the Badger quickly enlarges and enters, following their unfortunate tenants to the deepest recesses. They also eat insects, snails, and the eggs of the numerous small birds which nest upon the ground in prairie regions. It may, like the European Badger, prey upon the :inres of the wild bees, eating honey, wax and grubs; this habit, however, of our Badgers needs confirmation. With regard to its character and disposition, I transcribe the follow- ing from Dr. Coues: “The Badger has been called a ‘timid’ animal. 46 So it is, in the sense that it avoids, rather than confronts, impending danger; but this is simply the instinctive prudence and discretion of a creature which prefers the absolute immunity of its subterranean resorts to the chances of unequal combat in which it is at disadvantage. Cer- tainly no lack of courage, determination, and physical endurance is seen when the creature, captured or cut off from its retreat, is brought to bay. Its pluck then is as conspicuous as its really formidable strength. The cruel sport of ‘Badger baiting ” is sometimes indulged in the West; and if the animal be given a barrel or similar retreat, in which it is secure from attack in the rear, it may prove more than a match for a strong dog. Indeed, the fighting qualities of the Badger, and stubborn resist- ance it offers at whatever unfair odds, have supplied our language with a verb of peculiar significance: ‘to badger” is to beset on all sides, and harrass and worry. The stout, thick-set and depressed shape of the ani- mal is greatly in its favor, combining, with its long, loose hair, to pre- vent a dog from reaching vulnerable parts, and to embarrass it in at- tempting to take hold; the snap oi the jaws inflicts a serious wound; and finally the tenacity of life is at a high rate.” The Badger is not readily trapped; he will sometimes turn a trap over and spring it from the under side before attempting to remove the bait. With an earth-covered trap, dead fall or garrote, he may be taken; in early spring, while the ground is still hard, they may be easily captured by flooding their retreats. The habits of the animal in confinement have been carefully studied by Audubon and Bachman. They observed that in running, the fore- feet cross each other, and the body nearly touches the ground; the heel does not press the ground as in the bear, but is slightly elevated above it. In digging, the fore-feet are used for excavating, and the hind- feet, like paddles, to expel the earth from the hole; the animal buries itself in the ground in a minute, and very soon advances to the end of a ten-foot chain, then returns and excavates a fresh gallery, and so amuses itself until dragged away by main force. Their specimen was active and playful at night, but was dull through the day, lying rolled up like a ball with its head under the body for hours at a time. The animal did not refuse bread, but preferred meat, eating a half pound each day. The animal did not seem at all sluggish or inclined to hibernate, even when the weather was so cold as to freeze, continually, the water given him to drink. The reproduction of the species is not fully known. Dr. Coues hag seen a still ungrown specimen in Colorado during the latter part of August. The periods of gestation and lactation are probably unknown. 47 Mr. Gibson, author of the “Complete American Trapper,” states that the nest is in the burrow, and the young are three or four in number. Richardson, in speaking of its hibernation from November to April, in British America, states that, like bears, the animals do not lose flesh during the winter, but come out fat in the spring; he adds that, as they - pair at once, they soon become lean. The Badger yields a valuable, and at times, a fashionable fur; it is used for robes, muffs, tippets and trimmings. The London gales of Badger skins in 1873 were 2,700, bringing from one to seven shillings, averaging 1s. 6d. In 1875, they sold in this country for from $1 for best, to fifty cents for “seconds” and ten cents for “ thirds.” Thousands of shaving brushes are made from the long hairs; they are also used for artist’s brushes; one is known as the “ Badger blender.” “ The fur,” says Audubon, speaking of his tamed specimen, “had become, by the month of February, the most effectual protection against the cold that can well be imagined. The coloration is not striking, but the intimate blending of gray, tawny, black and white is pleasing. The general tone, however, isa grizzled gray, from which arises the common expression, “as gray as a badger.” The flesh is eatable; so is that of the skunk, but neither are inviting, scarcely palatable. Genus Mepaitis. (Cuvier.) Etymology: Lat. Mephitis, a foul or noxious exhalation. « Viverra 8)., of early authors. < Mephitis, Cuvier, ‘“Lecons d’ Anat., i, 1800” (coextensive with the sub- family), and of authors generally.—Baird, M. N. A., 1857, 191. < Chincha, Less., Nouv. Tab. R. An., 1842. > Spilogale, Gray, Proc. Zodl. Soc., 1865, 150. Type, S. interrupta=M. putorius. > Mephitis, Gill, Arrang. Fam. Mamm., 1872, 66. Generic Characters—Teeth 34; pm. 33; end of muzzle truncate verti- cally ; palate ending about opposite last molar; coronoid process of jaw conical, erect, its fore and hind borders converging to a vertical apex, in advance of condyle; angle of mandible not exflected; nostrils lat- eral; tail very long and bushy; soles comparatively narrow, hairy, at least in part; body elongated; snout prominent, not depressed. The Skunks are terrestrial animals, closely related to the Badgers in external conformation; the walk is plantigrade; the habits more or less fossorial; the fore-claws are large, straight, and well fitted for digging. The Skunks neither climb nor swim; they are slow and lumbering ; 48 their homes are burrows in the ground or dens in rocks and logs; the form is stout,.the legs short, and the body low; the tail is bushy, and the Qelage loose; the produced and enlarged snout gives them a somewhat hog-like physiognomy. They agree with the Badgers, and are unlike other Mustelidz in having a complete, bony septum separating the poste- rior nares. ; Phe leading feature, however, of the Skunks is the anal glands, com- mon to the Mu telide, but in this group reaching the maximum of development, and secreting a fluid which is the most penetrating, diffusible and intolerable of animal effluvia, affording to these otherwise inoffensive, and almost defenseless creatures a means of self-preservation as unique as it is effectuai, habitual reliance upon which modify the physiogomy of the entire genus, and impresses its whole nature. MEPHITIS MEPHITICA. Baird. ComMMoN SKONK. 1792, Viverra mephitica, Shaw, Mus. Lever., 1792, 178, No. 4, pl. 6; Gen. Zoél., i, 1800, 390, pl. 94, middle fig. 1808. Mephitis chinga, Tied., Zodl., i, 1808, 362 (partly).—Licht., Darstell. Saug., 1827-34, pl. 45, f.1; Abh. Akad. Wis. Berl. for 1836, 1838, 280.—Maxim., Reise N. A., i, 1839, 250; Arch. f. Naturg., 1861,—; Verz. N. A. Siug., 1862, 42.—Wagn., Suppl. Schreb., ii, 1841, 198.—Schinz, Syn., i, 1844, 328, No. 18.—Aud. & Bach., Q. N. A., i, 1849, 317, pl. 42.—Giebel, Siug., 1855, 766.—Fitzinger, Naturg. Saug., i, 1861, 315, f. 63. 1820. Mephitis americana, var. K, Desm., Mamm., i, 1820, 186. (“ Mustella”, lapsu. Includes all the American Skunks, vars. A—R); Nouv. Dict., xxi, 515 (var.7).—J. Sab., App. Frankl. Journ., 1823, 653.— Harl., Fn. Am., 1825, 70.—Griff., An. Kingd., v, 1827, 127, No. 358 (partly).—Less., Man., 1827, 151, No. 406.—Godm., Am Nat. Hist., i, 1831, 218, pl.—, f. 1—Doughty’s Cab. N. H., ii, 1832, 198, pl. 17.—Rich., Zod]. Beechey’s Voy., 1839, 4—Emmons, Rep. Quad. Mass., 1840, 49.—De Kay, N. Y. Zoél., i, 1842, 29, pl. 12, f. 1— Wyman, Pr. Bost. Soc., 1844, 110 (anat.).—Warren, Pr. Bost. Soc., iii, 1849, 175 (anat.).—Thomps., N. H. Vermont, 1853, 33.—Woodh., Sitgr. Rep., 1853, 44.—Kenn., Tr. Illinois Agric. Soc. for 1853-4, 1855, 578.—Beesley, Geol. Cape May, 1857, 137.— Billings, Canad. Nat. and Geol., i, 1857, 360.—Hall, Canad. Nat. and Geol., vi, 1861, 296. 1829. Mephitis americana var. hudsonica, Rich., F. B. A., i, 1829, 55, No. 19. vy 49 1829. Mephitis chinche, Fisch., Syn., 1829, 160 (includes other species; quotes Tiedemann primarily.) 1842. Chincha americana, Less., Nouv. Tabl. R. A., 1842, 67. 1857. Mephitis mephitica, Bd., M. N. A., 1857, 195.—Coop. and Suckl., N H. W. T., 1860, 94.—Hayd., Trans. Am. Philos. Soc., xii, 1862, 143.—Samuels, Ninth Ann- Rep. Mass. Agric. for 1861, 1862, 161.—Gerr., Cat. Bones Br. Mus., 1862, 97.—Allen, Bull. M. C. Z., i, 1869, 178; ii, 1871, 169 (critical).—Allen, Pr. Bost. Soc., xiii, 1869, 188.—Gilpin, Proc. and Tr. N. Scotia Inst., ii, 1870, 60.— Stev., U.S. Geol. Surv. Terr. for 1870, 1871, 461.—Parker, Am. Nat., v, 1871, 246 (anat. of anal glands, etc.)—Alen, Bull. Ess. Inst., vi, 1874, 46, 54, 59, 63.—Allen, Proc. Bost. Soc., xvii, 1874, p. 38.— Ames, Bull. Minn. Acad. Nat. Sci., 1874, 69.—Coues, Bull. U. §. Geol. and Geogr. Surv. Terr., 2d ser., No. 1, 1875, 8 (skull and teeth).—Coues and Yarrow, Zoél. Expl. W. 100dth Merid., v, 1875, 62—Allen, Bull. U. 8. Geol. Surv., vol. ii, No. 4, 1876, 822 (skull).—Coues, Mon. of Mus., 1877, 195. 1744. Enfan du Diable, Charlev., N. France, v, 1744, 196. 1772. Skunk, Forst., Phil. Trans.,lxii, 1772, 374.—Penn., Arct. Zodl., i, 1784, 85, No. 33.—Hearne, Journ., —, 377. Stinkthier, German. Béte puante, French. Description of External Featwres.—The Common Skunk is a heavily-built animal, with short limbs, low ears, small head, and long and bushy tail. The thick-set trunk is large behind, and the broad back naturally curved. The head is conoidal; the eye small and nearer the nose than the ear; the naked nasal-pad is large and protuberant; the nostrils are lateral. The bushy tail has no fine under fur; the long, coarse, almost tow-like hairs, when extended sideways, make the width of tail, in some speci- mens, greater than the length. The feet expose large plantar and pal- mar surfaces, usually naked, except that the soles are generally hairy about a third of the way from the heel. The claws of the hind-feet are stout and obtuse; they are covered with hairs; the middle three are about equal in length; the fifth is shorter, and the first does not reach the base of second. The plantar-pads are imperfectly separated into three,.to which the terminal toe-balls at once ata the toes are very short, and extensively united. The toes of the front feet are quite different, The third and fourth are sub-equal and longest; the second a little shorter; the fifth reaches scarcely half-way to the fourth, and the first not quite to the base of the second. The three middle claws are even longer than the digits that 4 50 bear them; they are acute and adapted to digging, strong, compressed, and little curved.; the palmar ‘padded area is indifferently separated into three'or four smaller pads. The white marking exists in almost endless diversity of extent and detail ; the most constant pattern is a sharp, narrow frontal stripe, and a broad nuchal area, from which diverge obliquely a pair of stripes toward or to the tail. The hairs of the tail are usually.all white at the base ; there is a white tuft at ‘the base of coarser and looser hairs than the gen- eral cover of the tail. The same coarse white hairs are disposed in irreg- ‘ular bundles in various places along the tail, exceeding the softer dark hairs in length; they are sometimes seven or eight inches in length. Dr. Coues is of the opinion that there is a tendency to increase of white according, in a measure, to specifi d geographical areas. In the south Atlantic and Gulf States, the white is at.a minimum, the stripes almost wanting, frontal stripe a mere trace, and the nuchal spot reduced ‘or broken. Throughout the west, and in British America, prolongation of the stripes to the tail, or even to its end, is the rule, the stripes grad- ually separating from a vertebral stripe into which the nuchal stripe is prolonged. -Accompanying this color of the western forms, is a bushier - tail, its width equal -to or greater than its length. Various cases of this kind have been recognized as species under the specific titles mesomelas, varians, macroura, etc. A decrease of size with latitude is-observable. Florida specimens, full grown, are notably smaller than New England Skunks, some not exceed- ing thirteen or fourteen inches. Distribution:—The Skunk is found in entire temperate North America, north to Hudson’s Bay and ‘Great-Slave Lake, scuth into Mexico, where its range overlaps that of the White Backed Skunk, ‘Conepatus mapurito. It is usually common, and in some districts abundant. From the nature of the animal, they are obviously less affected by the settlement of the country than their inherently wary and secretive carnivorous allies, which are often nearly exterminated as civilization advances. The Skunk, however, is often more abundant in frontier regions than in the unsettled parts of a country. Throughout British America, New Eng- land, the middle States, and come of the southern States, M. mephitica is the only species of the sub-family Mephitine known to occur. In most of the west and part of the south, it ranges with Syilogale putorius. The extreme south-west may possess the three’species found iu the United States. History.—Under the name of “ Polecat,” “Chinga,” “Skunk,” ‘“ Weasel ” (Pennant), and even “ Enfan du diable” (Charlevoix), the Skunk ap- 51 peared in zodlogical literature over one hundred years before the Lin- naean system. Gabriel Sagard-Théodat quaintly describes it in his his- tory of Canada, 1636, as follows: “Les enfans du diable, que les Hurons appellent Scangaresse, & le commun des Mon- tagnais Babougi Manitou, ou Ouinesque, est un beste fort puante, de la grandeur dan chat on d’un ieune renard, mais elle a Ja teste un peu moins aigué, & la peau couuerte d’un gros poil rude & enfumé, et sa grosse queue retroussée de mesnie, elle se cache en Hyuer sous la neige, & ne sort point qu’au commencement de la Lunedu mois de Mars, laquelle les Montagnais nomment Ouiniscon pismi, qui signifie la Lune de la Ouinesque. Cet animal, outre qu’il est de fort mauuaise odeur, est tres-malicieux & d’un laid regard, ils iettent aussi (& ce qu’on dit) parmy Jeurs excremens de petits serpens, longs & deliez, les quels ne viuent neant moins gueres long temps. Ven pensois apporter une peau passée, mais un Francois passager me i’ayant demandée ie la Juy donnay.” This passage contains the earliest account of the Skunk known to Richardson or Dr. Coues. The present species was not clearly indicated by Linnaeus and his early supporters. The Viverra putorius L. was based on Kalm’s “ Fiskatta,” no doubt the present animal, but the primary reference is to Catesby’s Polecat, and the description rather suits the Spilogale. Later (1736), Linnaeus rested his species on Catesby and Kalm (as in 1758), and involved the history by citing Hernandez, Ray, Seba, and Brisson, thus including animals generically as well as specifically distinct. Not until 1792 was the species described with sufficient perti- nence and exclusiveness (Viverra mephitica, Shaw) to warrant a tenable specific name. On account of its literal resemblance to the genus Mephitis (Cuvier), the specific title mephitica was suppressed until revived by Baird, in 1857, in accordance with the law of priority. M. chinga (Tiedemann, 1808), is undoubtedly the same as the present species, and was adopted by Tiedemann, Audubon and Bachman, and others, until 1857. Since this date the alliterative name, Mephitis me- phitica has become current. Habits.—The disposition, habits, and possibly the structure (as far as this may be conditional on its mode of life) of the Skunk, are modified so completely, as compared with other Mustelidx, by its unique and effi- cient mode of defense and offense, continual reliance upon which has changed its entire economy, that no correct outline can be portrayed, unless the nature and use of its peculiar armament are understood. “ The physiological réle of this special secretion is obvious. Its relation to the perpetuation of the species, though overshadowed by its exageration into a powerfully effective means of preservation of the invidual, is evidently the same as in other species of Mustelidx, each one of which has its own emanation to bring the sexes together, not only by amply indicating their whereabouts, but by serving as a positive attraction. In the case 52 of the Skunk, it would seem that the strong scent has actually tended to result in a more gregarious mode of life than is usual in this family of mammals; and it is certain, at any rate, that the occupancy by one ani- mal of a permanent winter abode, serves to attract others to the same retreat. Burrows are sometimes found to contain as many as a dozen in- dividuals, not members of one family, but various adult animals drawn together. One other effect of the possession of such unique powers is seen not so much in mode of life as in the actual disposition of the crea- tures. Its heedless familiarity, its temerity in pushing into places which other animals instinctively avoid as dangerous, and its indisposition to seek safety by hasty retreat, are evident results of its confidence in the extraordinary means of defense with which it is provided. In specula- ting upon the development of this anal armature to a degree which ren- ders it subservient to purposes for which the glands of other Musteline, though of similar character, are manifestly inadequate, it may not be amiss to recall how defenceless the Skunk would otherwise be in com- parison with its allies. A tardy terrestrial animal, of no great strength or spirit, lacking the sagacity and prowess of the Wolverine, the scanso- vial ability of the Martens, the agility, size, and prowess of the Ot- ters, and even much of the eminent fossorial capacity of its nearest relations, the Badgers—lacking all these qualities, which in their several exhibitions conduce to the safety of the respective species, it is evident that additional means of self-protection were required; while the abun- dance of the animal in most parts of the country, and its audacity in the face of danger, show that its confidence in the singular means of defense it possesses is not misplaced.” As long as the Skunk has been known, it is but a few years since the anatomy of its peculiar defensive organs has been known. The first re- liable retord is that of Dr. Jeffries Wyman, in 1844, which are here sranscribed: “The anal pouches are two glandular sacs of an oval shape, about three-quarters of an inch in diameter, covered with a muscular envelope, and opening into the rectum quite near to the anus by two papille. These last, when not protruded, are surrounded by a fold of mucous membrane, and very nearly concealed by it. The fluid is ejected by the contractions of the muscular covering. A small band passes from each sac to the ischinm, which rotates these bodies on themselves, and serves to bring their orifices to the anus. The fluid is a peculiar secre- tion like that of the civet, and not the urine, as is commonly supposed. The common opinion, that the animal scatters it with its tail, is erro- neous. The fluid is imited in quantity, and having been discharged, the animal is harmless until the sacs are again filled by gradual secre- 53 tion.” The discharge is not visible, ordinarily, in the daytime; several competent observers state that it has a phosphorescent glow at night. When the animal is pursued, it leisurely arrests its course, raises the hinder parts, lifts the tail, the nipple-like eminence of the glands appears through the anus, the constrictor muscles of the glands are contracted, and the golden acrid fluid is suddenly ejected several feet upward and backward in two streams. The scent is almost indestructible. Audubon mentions it as being tolerably strong at a place where a Skunk had been killed in autumn, even after the snow had disappeared the following spring. The acrid discharge often renders dogs permanently blind; there are authentic cases in which men have lost their eyesight in consequence of the severe inflammation induced by the fluid. It is also extremely nauseating, often producing sickness of the stomach and violent vomiting. Like most foul odors, it is decomposed by chloride of lime. Burying affected clothing in the earth removes the odor. That the pelt may be absolutely purified of the scent, is shown by furriers disinfecting them by the same processes used for the skins of Wolves, Foxes, and other Mustelidz. Like most carnivorous animals, the Skunk is somewhat nocturnal, though often out in the daytime. In northern latitudes it hibernates imperfectly, arousing itself occasionally, perhaps for the evacuation of its anal pouches. In the south it ranges freely at all seasons. It some- times takes up its winter dwelling oddly enough under barns or tene- ments, and the cessation of its torpidity during mild periods of weather, is very evident. Unlike other wary members of its family, it has no fear of man’s abode. It sometimes robs poultry, eggs, and milk, committing its depredations in the most awkwardly open manner, scarcely attempting escape when discovered, as though it relied upon the impenetrable atmosphere with which it surrounds itself; hence it often falls a victim to its own cupid- ity. Away from settlements, it makes its nest in decayed logs and stumps, fence rows, crevices in rocks, or in fact any natural shelter it can secure. Sometimes it excavates burrows near the surface, six or eight feet long, ending in a chamber lined with leaves, where as many as fifteen are found packed together. They are more gregarious than others of the family. Those in a burrow are not necessarily of the same family. They are extremely productive, bringing forth, in May, eight or ten young. The time of gestation is probably not known. Were they not so stupidly reliant upon their defensive armor, and so offensive, they might become too abundant; as it is, their natural means of preservation prevent their undue increase. Dogs and Wolves destro 54 and eat them in spite of their odor, as do also some of the preying birds. Insects, birds’ eggs, and young, small mice, and frogs are their ordinary food ; occasionally they secure a rabbit in his burrow. Uses —The Skunk yields a handsome fur, which is put on the market under the name of “ Alaska Sable.” The Hudson’s Bay Company handle a thousand or more yearly. The pelt 'is one of the staples of American furriers, thousands being yearly exported to Europe. The black furs are the most valuable, often selling for a dollar each. No special skill is required for their capture; they are easier trapped than disposed of. They are taken readily in fox-traps carelessly set. It is customary to clear them off the range before attempting to take the Fox. The Fox is fond of the Skunk’s flesh, and it is often used to bait the fox-traps. The Skunk, once trapped, is easily choked by a running wire noose attached to a long pole in the hands of the trapper, who thus escapes defilement. Mr. Maynard states that, in Florida, the Little Striped Skunk is do- raesticated and used as Cats, the scent-glands being removed at an early age. Dr. J. W. Warren has put the Common Skunk under the influence of an anesthetic, and severed the ducts of the anal glands by cutting down on the outside of the intestine, suffering the glands to remain in their normal position. The adhesive infammation resulting deprives the animal effectually of its meens of annoyance. Regarding the domestication of the Skunk, Dr. Coues discourses, face- tiously, as follows: “The different species of Skunks, in fact, seem to be susceptible of ready semi-domestication, in which state they are, like the Fitch or Ferret, useful in destroying vermin, if they do not also make agreeable pets. Writers speak of the removal of the anal glands in early life, to the better adaptation of the animal to human society, and such would appear to be an eminently judicious procedure. For, though Skunks may habitually spare their favors when accustomed to the pres- ence of man, yet I should think that their companionship would give rise to a certain sense of insecurity, unfavorable to peace of mind. To depend upon the good will of so irritable and so formidable a beast, whose temper may be ruffled in a moment, is hazardous—like the enjoyment of a cigar in a powder magazine.” Hydrophobia from Skunk-bite—It has long been known that a disease like hydrophobia often results from the bite of the Skunk. This subject has been investigated and presented by the Rev. Horace C. Hovey, in the American Journal of Science and Art, for May, 1874, and by John G. Janeway, M_D., Assistant Surgeon U.S. A., in the New York Medical Jour- nal, for March 18, 1875. 55 Mr. Hovey contends that hydrophobia from Skunk bite is different from Rabies canina, and proposes for it the term Rabies mephitica. He suggests there may be a causative connection between inactivity of the anal glands and the generation of a special hydrophobic virus generated in the glands of the mouth. He also thinks that the mephitic secretion may be the natural antidote to the salivary virus. Mr. Hovey collected the particulars of forty one cases of Rabies mephitica, all of which proved fatalexceptone. He also proposes the theory that hydrophobia originates with the allied genera of Mephitis, Putorius and Mustela, and it is trans- ferred from them to the Felide and Canidz, and other families. The ac- tual importance of the subject, and the novelty of the views entertained, attracted considerable attention. Dr. Janeway replied in an elaborate article, detailing cases, and coming to the conclusion that ‘ Rabies mephitica” is essentially hydrophobia; that the rabid wounds of the Skunk are fatal in so great a majority of cases, because the animal seizes unprotected parts, usually the face or hand, where there is no clothing to wipe off the virulent moisture of the teeth. Besides the present species, it is possible that the Little Striped Skunk, M. ‘puorius, may occur in Ohio. It is a southern and western species, abundant in Iowa, and possibly occurring in central New York, although the evidence is very unsatisfactory. “Dr. 8. J. Parker, of Ithica, New York, has twice seen, by the road-side in that region, a small many- striped Skunk, very different from the common one.” The Long-tailed Skunk, of Mexico. M. macrura; the White-backed Skunk, Conepatus ma- purito, of the south-western border of the United States into South America, are the remaining species recognized by Dr. Coues, inhabiting North America. Genus Lutra.. Linn. Generic Characters.—The genus Lutra includes musteline animals having a stout but cylindrical and lengthened body; obtuse muzzle; small ears ; short, broad feet, with the digits full-webbed; feet naked or partly hairy on the palms and soles; claws small but well formed; tail without special lateral dilatation, long, tapering, nearly cylindrical; pelage without striking color contrasts. Dental formula: i. 23; ¢ £4; pm. $$; mE} =}%—36. The upper pre-molar has a large internal shelf, making the contour of the whole crown triangular; skull depressed and flattened on top, the dorsal outline more or less nearly straight and horizontal; ros- trum extremely short, bringing the fore ends of the nasals opposite the anterior root of the zygoma, the sides of the rostrum erect, the top flat ; cerebral portion of the skull swollen backward, with strongly convex lateral outline ; anteorbital foramen very large, bounded above by a slen- 56 der bridge of bone; posterior nares thrown into one conduit; palate extending far back of molars; pterygoids strongly hamulate. Many of the above expressions are applicable to sub-family Lutrine as a whole. Particular points of Lutra proper, are the presence of perfect claws, as opposed to their rudimentary condition in some of the Old World Otters (or even wanting, as in Leptonyz and Aonyzx), and in the lack of special dilatation of the tail, as in the South American Pterwra or Pteronura. The Lutrine, as designated, formerly included the Sea Otter, Enhydris lutris, which has the general aspect and cranial features of the ordinary Otter. Its hind limbs, however, are flipper-like organs, not very unlike those of some Seals; the teeth are pebble-like, moreover, instead of sharp and angular, as in ordinary carnivores; indeed, the whole dentition is adapted to a piscivorous diet. While the Sea Otter has, like the Common Otter, the same number of teeth above and below, it lacks one pair of incisors below, and one pair of pre-molars above, reducing the dentition to thirty-two. These differences are the basis of the sub-family Enhy- drinz, with the Sea Otter as its only representative. : Besides Lutra canadensis, there is a Mexican species, Lutra californica, Gray, which Dr. Coues thinks distinct from L. brasiliensis. These, with Lutra vulgaris, are the distinct, or probably distinct, species with which, as will be seen by the synonymy, the widely distributed Lutra canadensis has been confounded. LUTRA CANADENSIS. Sabine. CoMMON OTTER; LAND OTTER; AMERICAN OTTER. 1806. Mustela canadensis, Turton, 8. N., i, 1806, 57 (not Mustela canadensis, _id., ibid., 59, which is M. pennant:, the Pekan; not of Schreber, nor of Erxleben, nor of authors). 1816. Lutra gracilis, Oken, Lehrb. Naturg. Th., iii, Abth., ii, 1816, 986 -(“Staatenland, Insel. an Amerika, bei New York”’’). 1823, Lutra canadensis, “ F. Cuvier, Dict. Sc. Nat., xxvii, 1823, 242.—Is. Geoff., Dict. Class., ix, 520.”—J. Sabine, App. Frankl. Jour., 1828, 653.—Less., Man., 1827, 154, No. 414.—Griff, An. King., v, 1827, 180, No, 362.—Fisch., Syn., 1829, 225.—Rich., F. B. A., i, 1829, 57, No. 20.—Emmons, “Rep. Quad. Mass., 1838, 25 ;” Rep. Quad. Mass., 1840, 46.—Rich., Zodl. Beechey’s Voy., 1839, 4—~Maxim., Reise N. Am., i, 1889, 211; Arch. Naturg., 1861, 236; Verz. N. A. Saug., 1862, 60, pl. 8, 6 (08 penis).—DeKay, N. Y. Zodl.,, i, 1842, 39, pl. 3, f. 1, pl. 83, £. 1, 2, 38 (skull).—Linsley, Am. Jour. Sei., xliii, 1842—Schinz, Syn., i, 1844, 349, No. 5—Aud. & 1820. 1828. 1881. 1837. 1841. 1843. 1847. 1853. 1857. 1863. 1865. 57 Bach., Q. N. A., ii, 1851-2, pl. 51—Woodh., Sitgreaves’s Rep., 1853, 44.—Kenn., Tr. Illinois Agric. Soc. for 1853-4-5, 578.—Gie- bel, Siug., 1855, 789.—Beesley, Geol. Cape May, 1857, 187.—Bad., M. N. A., 1857, 184, pl. 38, f. a, b, ¢, d, e-—Billings, Canad. Nat. and Geol., i, 1857, 228.—Samuels, Ninth Amer. Rep. Mass. Agric. for 1861, 1862, 60:—Hayd., Tr. Amer. Phil. Soc., xii, 1862, 143.— Hall, Canad. Nat. and Geol., vi, 1861, 297.—Ross, Canad. Nat. and Geol., vi, 1861, 35.—Barnston, Canad. Nat. and Geol., vill, 1863.—Gerr., Cat. Bones Br. Mus., 1862, 101.—Alen, Pr. Bost. Soc., xiii, 1865, 183; Bull. M. C. Z., i, 1869, 178; ii, 1871, 169 (Florida).—Gilpin, Proc. and Tr. N. Scotia Inst., ii, 1870, 60.— All., Bull. Ess. Inst., vi, 1874, 46, 63 (Kansas and Utah).—Ames, Bull. Minn. Acad. Nat. Sci., 1874, 69.—Coues and Yarrow, Zodl. Expl. W. 100 Merid., v, 1875, 63.—Jordan, Man. Vert., 1878, 19, 2d ed.—Allen, Bull. U. S. Geol. and Geog. Surv. Terr., vol. ii, No. 4, 1876, 331 (skull).—Coues, Mon. of N. A. Mus., 1877, 295. Lutra brasiliensis, Desm., Mamm., i, 1820, 188 (in part).—Harl., Fn. Amer., 1825, 71 (in part).—Godm., Am. N. H., i, 1831, 222, pl. —, f. 2 Gin part).—Thomps., N. H. Vermont, 1853, 33. Lutra lataxina, F. Cuv., “ Dict. Sc. Nat., xxvi, 1823, 242;” Suppl. Buffon, i, 1831, 203.—‘‘Is. Geoff, Dict. Class., ix, 520.”—Griff, An. Kingd., v, 1827, 131, No. 364.—Less., Man., 1827, 154, No. 416.—Fisch., Syn., 1829, 226, No. 4.—DeKay, N. Y. Zodl., i, 1842- 4.—Schinz, Syn., i, 1844, 350. Lutra hudsonica, (?) F. Cuv., Suppl. Buffon, i, 1831, 194. Latax lataxina, Gray, Ann. & Mag. N. H., i, 1837, 119. Lnutra vulgaris var. canadensis, Wagn., Suppl. Schreber, ii, 1841, 256. Lataxina mollis, Gray, List. Mamm. B. Mus., 1843, 70 (type fig. by Aud. & Bach., 1. c.). Lutra americana, Wyman, Pr. Bost. Soc., ii, 1847, 249 (on articula- tion of mandible). Mustela hudsonica, “ Lacepéde.” Lutra canadensis var., Aud. & Bach., Q. N. A., ili, 1858, 97, pl. 122 (fig. by Gray, type of Lataxina mollis). Lutra californica, Bd., M. N. A., 1857, 187.—Newb., P. R. R. Rep., vi, 1857, 42.—Coop. & Suck., N. H. W. T., 1860, 115. (Probably not of Gray.) Lutra destructor, Barnst., Canad. Nat. and Geol., viii, 1853, 147, f. — (Lake Superior). Latax canadensis, Gray, P. Z. 8., 1865, 123; Cat. Carn. Br. Mus., 1869. 58 Habitat.—North America at large, being somewhat sparingly distribu- ted over most of the waters of the continent; said to occur in Central America. The Otter appears to be nowhere in great abundance, nor yet wanting in few if any localities adapted to its habits. Its wildness, wariness, and sagacity, and the nature of its haunts, all conduce to its existence even in well settled districts. Mr. Allen speaks of it as not rare in Massachu- setts in 1869. One was brought to the Smithsonian Institution in 1874, taken from the Potomac near Washington City. It is still abundant in Florida, where the natural thinness of its fur tends to its preservation. The “ Eastern Shore” of Maryland seems to have always been a favorite resort of the Otter. It is abundant northward, 11,000 skins being set down for 1873, in the Hudson’s Bay Company’s London quotations. The southern limits of distribution are not settled; no unquestionable evi- dence is at hand of its occurrence in Mexico. Specific Characters—Orbits well defined by prominent conical post- orbital processes, the distance between the tips of which is one-half or more of the intermastoid width of the skull; inner depressed moiety of posterior upper premolar as large and nearly as long as the main outer moiety; general dentition strong; naked nasal pad (an inch long or broad in full-grown individuals) extending back above the nostrils in a \/-shaped outline, reaching below the nostrils with a straight transverse border, which sorhetimes sends a slight spur part way down the median line of the lip; palms hairy between the digits isolating the individual bald digital bulbs, and having an isolated patch or carpal peninsula of hair posteriorly ; soles hairy between the digits, isolating the individual digital bulbs, much encroached upon by hair from behind, and having _ three or four peculiar, small, circular, elevated callosities arranged around the posterior border of the main bald plantar surface ; (form, stature, and coloration not diagnostic ;) finally attaining a length of four feet or more; liver-brown, with purplish gloss, paler on the under surface of the head, throat, and breast. External Characters—The massive columnar body without constricted neck ; small, round head; small eyes and ears; long, taper tail; short, stout limbs; broad webbed feet; close-set, glossy hair, and abundant wooly under-fur, common to the genus, are shared by the Otter. The nasal pad is well developed, bald, in general shape an equilateral penta- gon; the whiskers are short, stout, stiff bristles, in several series; the eyes are small, nearer the muzzle than the ear; the ears are small, with a thin, pointed conch, about as long as the adjacent fur; the entrance is covered with fur ; the short, front limb has a stout wrist, and broad, flat 59 —s hand, bearing the toes which, distended, form nearly a semi-circle about the palm; the toes are webbed to about the middle of the conspicuous digital bulbs ; the hand is hairy above; the digital bulbs are bald below, but the webbing is more or less completely hairy, isolating the naked bulbs from each other, and from the palmar surface; the main palmar pad is naked, except a posterior scanty patch of hair, which may, by an isthmus, connect with the fur on the wrist ; the soles resemble the palms in the webbing—the shape is different; the fourth digit is much elongat :d, the third shorter, second and first rapidly graduated, and the fifth intermediate between the third and second; all the bald partso the palm and sole are tesselated with minute papille; on the back margin of the naked portion of the plantar pad, are three or four small, definite, elevated circular papille, peculiar to this species as far as known, and which Dr. Coues suggests may be the excretory pores of a glandular organ beneath the skin; the claws, back and front, are short, stout, arched, compressed, tapering to an acute point from a thick base; the front claws are larger, sharper, and more arched than the hind ones. The variations in stature are extraordinary; some are twice as large and heavy as others apparently as mature—sexually so, at least. An average length is four to four and one-half feet ; nose to root of tail, three feet; nose to eye, one and three-quarters to two inches ; nose to ear, three and one-half to four inches; ear less than an inch high, and about as broad; fore foot, three and one-half inches; hind foot four inches ; girth of body about one and one-half feet; stature a foot or less; weight twenty to twenty-five pounds. The general color is a highly lustrous, rich, dark liver-brown, but little lighter on the belly. The longer hairs are stiff, and glistening when viewed with the lay of the hairs; this it is that gives the fur its beautiful lustre. The under-fur is a yellowish white at the base, and light liver-brown at the tip; the former color is in excess on the back, the latter on the sides and belly ; the transition is imperceptible. There are no special markings anywhere ; the darkest part of the pelage is the top of the tail; the soles, palms, and nasal pad are dark. History of the Species—Systematic authors of the last century either confounded the present species with the European L. vulgaris, or with South American species Until quite recently this species has been con- founded with the Brazilian Otter, by some French and even American authors. The specific characters already given are drawn by Dr. Coues, with special reference to antithesis with L. vulgaris. Mustela canadensis, of Turton (Systema Nature, 1806, p. 57, English version), has priority over Lutra canadensis, of Sabine (1823), usually quoted as authority for 60 this species. Turton oddly enough allowed the same name, Mustela cana- densis, for the Pekan or Fisher, M. pennanti (Systema Nature, p. 59). Professor Wyman, in 1847, named our species Lutra americana. Lutra californica, Baird, and Lutra destructor, Barnst., are undoubted L. canadensis. The first has the palms and soles less hairy than is usual in L. canadensis, and was reluctantly admitted by Professor Baird, he erroneously sup- posing it to be the true L. californica, of Gray. The second is smaller than the average, but as L. canadensis grows for several years after sexual maturity, Mr. Barnston’s specimens may not be full grown. Neither of these species depart, however, from the normal variations of L. canadensis. Habits—The general structure of the American and European Otters is so nearly identical, their movement and general attitudes can- not be very different. Speaking of the European species, Bell has remarked that evidently every facility consistent with the preservation of its structural relations with the rest of the group, is given to the Otter for the pursuit and cap- ture of its proper food. “It swims and dives with great readiness, and with peculiar ease and elegance of movement; and although its action on land is far from being awkward and difficult, yet it is certainly in the water that the beautiful adaptation of its structure to its habits is most strikingly exhibited. It swims in nearly a horizontal position, and dives instantaneously after the fish that may glide beneath it, or pursues it under water, changing its course as the fish darts in various directions to escape from it. When the prey is secured, the Otter brings it on shore to its retreat to feed.” The Otter is intelligent and docile, easily domes- ticated, coming like the dog when whistled for. Several, which Audu- bon took when quite young, became gentle as puppies, romping with their master about his study. These ate milk and boiled corn meal, re- fusing fish or meat until several months old. They may be taught to catch fish from the streams for the table. There is no record of the American Otter serving as a purveyor, but instances have been narrated of the fishing habits of the domesticated Old World species, from the time of Albertus Magnus to the late Bishop Heber. This prelate relates that on the banks of the Malta Colly he saw ten large and beautiful Ot- ters (probably the Asiatic species, Lutra nair, Fr. Cuvier) tethered to bamboo stakes by the river, some playing in the water, others rolling in the sand. He was told that the fishermen kept one or more Otters to aid in fishing, the. Otters sometimes driving the shoals into the net and‘ bringing out large fish with their teeth. The good bishop was so much pleased as to conclude that “the simple Hindoo shows here a better taste and judgment than half the Otter-hunting and Badger-baiting gentry of England.” 61 The fossorial ability of the Otter is not of a high order. Its wnder- ground retreats are not as ingeniously constructed as those of the Musk- rat. It avails itself of any convenient excavation, as the hollows under the overhanging roots of trees. Audubon found three Otters on a bed composed of the inner bark of trees and soft water grasses. This nest was in a hollow tree, with the entrance under water. The Otters were captured in the morning, by cutting a hole into the tree above the nest. and securing the neck of each animal between the halves of a split sap- pling. They generally keep near their fishing haunts, but may be driven by a scarcity of fish to resort far inland to the farming lands, at- tacking lambs, sucking pigs, and poultry; at least this is the habit of the British species. Richardson speaks of the Canada Otter frequenting rapids and falls in the winter season, to be sure of open water, often traveling long dis- tances in search of unfrozen rapids. Pursued by the hunter on these journeys, it runs so rapidly that a swift runner on snow-shoes can ecarcely overtake it. It runs swiftly, and throws itself forward on its belly, sliding several yards through the snow, leaving a deep furrow be- hindit. This movement is rapidly repeated; it doubles on its track, and dives under the snow to evade its pursuers; if closely pressed, it turns and defends itself with great pertinacity. The same author states that in the spring of 1826, at Great Bear Lake, the Otters often robbed the nets set under ice, taking off the heads of the fish and leaving the bodies in the net. The period of gestation of our species is undetermined. The European species, according to Bell, carries her young nine weeks, bringing forth three to five in March or April. The American Otter, according to Rich- ardson, has one litter annually, about the middle of April, of from one to three young. Audubon observes that in the middle and southern States they are about one month earlier. Uses.—During the century, 1769-1868, the Hudson’s Bay Company sold in London 674,027 Otter skins; the Canadian Company sold, from 1763 to 1839 inclusive, 895,832 pelts. The first mentioned company sold 14,966 skins during 1868; the same autumn other companies disposed of 22,000 skins. These figures will give some idea of the commercial rela- tions of this species. The skin is removed by a cross slit down the hind legs, and withdrawn entire. It is stretched with the hair inside, the tail only being slit on the under side and spread out flat. The pelt is of such beauty and value, on account of its rich, warm color and exquisite soft- ness, as well as its large size, that the animal is systematically followed by the professional trapper. Heavy double-spring steel traps are em- 62 ployed, baited on the pan with fish, or hidden in the snow path, or at the top of the slide; the trap is scented with various animal odors, and eare is taken not to handle the trap with bare hands. The sight and smell of the Otter are so acute, and his wariness and sagacity of so high an order, that the utmost caution is required to insure his capture. Audubon’s observation of the “sliding” of the Otter is as follows: “The Otters ascend the bank at a place suitable for their diversion, and sometimes where it is very steep, so that they are obliged to make quite an effort to gain the top. They slide down in rapid succession where there are many at a sliding place. On ene occasion we were resting ourself on the bank of Canoe Creek, a small stream near Henderson, which empties into the Ohio, when a pair of Otters made their appear- ance, and, not observing our proximity, began to enjoy their sliding pastime. They glided down the soap-like, muddy slope of the slide with the rapidity of an arrow from a bow, [ft] and we counted each one making twenty-two slides before we disturbed their sportive occupation. “This habit of the Otter of sliding down from elevated places to the borders of streams, is not confined to cold countries, or to slides on ice or snow, but is pursued in the southern States, where the earth is seldom covered with snow, or the waters frozen over. Along the reserve-dams of the rice field: of Carolina and Georgia, these slides are very common. From the fact that this occurs in mest cases during winter, about the period of the rutting season, we are inclined to believe that this propen- sity may be traced to these instincts which lead the sexes to their peri- odical associations. : “The Otter is a very expert swimmer, and can overtake almost any fish ; and as it is a voracious animal, it doubtless destroys a great number of fresh water fishes annually. We are not aware of its having a prefer- ence for any particular species, although it is highly probable that it has. About twenty-five years ago, we went early one autumnal morning to study the habits of the Otter at Gordon and Spring’s Ferry, on the Cooper River, six miles above Charleston (S. C.], where they were rep- resented as being quite abundant. They came down with the receding tide in groups of families of five or six together. In the space of two hours we counted forty-six. They soon separated, ascending the differ- ent creeks in the salt marshes, and engaged in capturing mullets [Mugél], In most cases they came to the bank with the fish in their mouths, dispatching it in a minute, and then hastened back again after more prey. They returned up the river to their more secure retreat with the rising tide. In the small lakes and ponds of the interior of Carolina, t “A statement certainly too figurative for literal acceptation.” (Coues.) 63 there is found a favorite fish with the Otter, called the fresh-water trout (Grystes salmoides). “ Although the food of the Otter in general is fish, yet when hard pressed by hunger it will not reject animal food of any kind. Those we had in confinement, when no fish could be procured, were fed on beef, which they always preferred boiled. During the last winter we ascer- tained that the skeleten and feathers of a wild duck were taken from an Otter’s nest on the banks of a rice field reserve-dam. It was conjec- tured that the duck had either been killed or wounded by the hunters, and was in this state seized by the Otter.” FAMILY URSIDA. The family Ursidx formerly included the Raccoons, to which they are allied by the tuberculate premolars, plantigrade walk, and stout body; the group is now restricted to the Bears proper, of large size, clumsy form, and very short tail. The cutting and compressed crowns of the sectorial teeth characteristic of the Cats and Dogs, are here replaced by broad teeth, with the crowns studded with tubercles, adapting the Bears to the more varied nature of their food. The species are not numerous, and, with the exception of one species, Ursus ernatus, which occurs in the South American Andes, are only found in the northern hemisphere. Genus Ursus. Jinneeus. Generic Characters.—Body thick, clumsy, and large ; feet entirely planti- grade; soles naked ; wee ace tail very short; head very broad. Denti- tion: i. $230 Ey; pm. Hp; m. $3 —35-—42. The skull of the Bears is larger, and the muzzle longer and broader than in th.: Dogs and Cats; the lower jaw is massive and high ; the bony palate extends behind the molar teeth. In the bears the molar teeth (seven) attain the maximum found in placental mammalia; some of the premolars are very small, and early deciduous, particularly the second and third. The first three premolars above and below are small; they have a single fang, and at their crowns are occupied by a single compressed tubercle. The fourth upper premolar represents the sectorial tooth of the carnivora; its shape is triangular with the base posterior instead of anterior, asin Dogs. The first true molar has an oblong crown, with four principal cusps. There are in the United States two perfectly distinct species; the Black Bear, Ursus americunus, and the ‘Grizzly, Ursus arctos horribilis, the “ Cinnamon Bear” of mountaineers (not the Cinnamon Bear of authors, which is U. americanus var. cinnamoneus). The Grizzly is probably not specifically different from U. arctos of Europe. The two occur under al- most every variation of color, but retain their specific characters through- 64 out. The Barren Ground Bear, Ursus arctos, Richardson (Fauna Boreali- Americani), may require to be added to those cited. The Black Bear must have been early driven from the woods of Ohio. It still inhabits the mountain regions of Tennessee and Kentucky. Ursus AMERICANUS. Pallas. Buiack BEAR. Var. americanus. 1780. Ursus americanus, Pallas, Spic. Zodl., xiv, 1780, 6.-—Bodd., Elench. Anim., i, 1784, 79.—Gmel., Syst. Nat., i, 1788, 101—Desm., Mamm., i, 1820, 165.—Harlan, Fn. Amer., 1825, 51.—Rich., F. B. A., i, 1829, 14—Fisch., Syn., 1829, 143.—Godm., Am. Nat. Hist., i, 1831, 114.—DeKay, N. Y. Zodl., i, 1842, 24—Aud. & Bach., Q. N. A., iii, 1853, 187, pl. 141.—Bd., M. N. A., 1857, 225. ~ —Jordan, Manual of the Vertebrates, 1878, 20.—Coues and Yar- row, Geolog. and Geog. Exp. and Surv. West 100 Merid., 1875, vol. v, 69. 1827. Ursus niger americanus, Griff, An. Kingd., v, 1827, No. 318. Var. cinnamonieus. 1858. Ursus americanus var. cinnamemum, Aud. & Bach., Q. N. A., ili, 1853, 125, pl. 127. 1857. Ursus americanus var. cinnamomeus, Bd., M. N. A., 1857, 228. Distribution.—The Black Bear is widely distributed throughout North America. The var. Cinramomeus occurs in the Rocky Mountain region, and in Oregon. Specific Characters—The size is small; feet moderate; fore claws not twice as long as the hind claws; color entirely uniform throughout, either black or brownish; hairs darkest towards the tips. The above characters serve to separate the Black Bear from the Grizzly, which is very large; feet large, with the fore claws twice as long as the back claws. The dark dorsal and lateral flank stripes of the Grizzly are opposed to the uniform coloration of the Black, as are the brownish, yellow, or hoary tips of the hairs in the former to the black tips of the latter. The hair of the Black is much softer than that of the Grizzly, and has not the wiry wool at the base of the long hair as in the Grizzly. The Bear continued in considerable abundance in parts of Ohio—in Athens county, according to local history (E. Cutler, authority quoted, in history of Athens county, 1869). Taylor, in ‘ History of Ohio, 1854,” quotes from the journal of Major John Rogers, January, 1761: “We traveled eleven miles and encamped, having killed in our march, this day, three Bears and two Elks.” (Voyage along coast of Lake Erie.) From the “ Pioneer History of the Ohio Valley (Hildreth, 1848, I quote 65 the following anecdote, as it shows the prevalence of Bears as late as 1805: “One day during the same year (1805), two of the children of John Spencer were playing in the yard of the cabin at the ‘Big Spring,’ when a huge Bear came along, and seized a pig near them and made off with it. Had Bruin selected the youngest of those children, instead of the pig, the career of the late Colonel William Spencer would have been cut short.” FAMILY PROCYONIDA. The characters of this family, as distinguished from the Bears, are sufficiently indicated under the genus Procyon. There is one upper true molar less on each side than in Ursidz. The last premolar of upper jaw and first molar of lower jaw are tubercular. The tail is moderately long, and the muzzle pointed. Aelurus, F. Cuvier, and Cercoleptes, Illiger, are the typical genera of the closely allied families formerly included with the Raccoons, in Ursidx, but now separated, with the family names Aelur- idx and Cercoleptide (Arctoidea procyoniformia, Gill). Genus Procyon Storr. Generic Characters:—The Raccoons have the body stout; tail well devel- oped (as opposed to Ursidx); muzzle somewhat pointed. Dentition: i233; ¢ E>; pm. EP; m. $3—40. The smaller size, longer tail, more pointed muzzle, less number of teeth readily separate the Raccoons from the Bears, to which they are allied’ by the tubercular teeth, plantigrade walk,.and naked soles. The gen:>ral shape is not unlike that of the badger; it is higher on the legs. The head is broad and depressed, the muzzle pointed to the truncate end. The whiskers are in four principal series, of five or six in each; there is a tuft ever the eye, one at the angle of the jaw, and one under the mid- dle of the chin. The ears are rather large; rounded above. They are covered with hair, except about the meatus. The tail is covered with hair and marked with alternate rings of black and whitish ; the verte- bre of the tail are about half the length of the head and body. The toes are without webbing, and are cleft nearly to the bases of the hand and foot. The five-toed feet have naked soles from the wrist and heel; the skin of the sole is highly papillose, and doubtless highly tactile. There are no raised pads; narrow, deep furrows, however, cross the under surface, as in the cats and weasels. The claws are curved, non-retractile, moderately sharp; they are nearly equal in all the feet. In our species, the third and fourth toes are sub-equal, and longest 5) 66 in the fore foot; the claw of the second reaches to end of third; the thumb is shortest. On the hind-foot, the first toe is much shortest ; third and fourth, sub-equal and longest; the second and fifth are about equal, their claws reaching to the bases of the claws of third and fourth. Two North American species are recognized, ours, and Procyon hernan- dezit of Texas, and west to the Pacific. Procyon Lotor (Linn.) Storr. Raccoon; *‘ Coon.” 1758. Ursus lotor, Linn., Syst. Nat ; i, 1758, 48; 1766, 70.—Schreb., Saug., iii, 1778, 521—Erxl., Syst. Nat., 1777, 165—Gm., Syst. Nat., i, 1778, 103.—Harlan, Fn. Amer., 1825, 53. 1780. Procyon lotor, Storr, Prod. Meth. Anim., 1780.—Desm., Mamm., i, 1820, 168.—Griff., An. Kined., v, 1827, 114.—Fischer., Syn , 1829, 147.—Rich., Fn. Bor. Amer., i, 1829, 86.—Doughty’s Cab. N. H., li, 1832, 78, pl. 7—De Kay, N. Y. Zodl., i, 1842, 26—Aud. & Bach., Q. N. A., ii, 1851, 74, pl. 61—Baird, Mam. N. A., 1857, 209.—Allen, Bull. M.C. Z., i, 1869, 181; ii, 1871, 170—Coues and Yarrow, Expl. and Surv. West 100th Merid., vol. v, 64, 1875. 1784. Meles lotor, Bodd., Elenchus Animal., 1784, 80. Specific Characters General color grayish-white; the tips of the long hairs are black, and impart this color to the back; under fur dark- brown. A large, oblique, black patch on the cheek, continuous with a paler one beneath the jaw; another behind the ear. End of muzzle, ex- ‘cept the upper line, together with the posterior border of the cheek- patch whitish. Tailslightly tapering; tip and five rings black; these rings as broad as the rusty-white interspaces. Hind feet not exceeding four inches; above, dirty-whitish. Fore feet not exceeding above 2? inches. Varies in being nearly black, with the markings obscured; sometimes more or less yellowish or white, with obsolete markings or none. A de- cided tendency to albinism. Measurements.—A specimen in the flesh had the following dimensions in inches: Nose, to root of tail, 22} inches; nose to end of outstretched legs, 234 inches; nose to eye, 2+; to ear, 4+. Tail, from root to end of vertebrae, 104; to end of hairs, 124 inches. Ears, height in front, 2}; height behind, 24; width, 17. Arms, between claws, across shoulder, 27; length of fore-arm, 4%; longest claw, 4 inch. Leg, from knee-joint to end of claw, 82; hind foot, from heel to end of claws, 4 inches. The colors of the exterior are due to the long, stiff hairs interspersed among the basal hair. Along the back these hairs are black at the end, and usually elsewhere. Sub-terminally the hairs are broadly whitish; then follows a ring of light-brownish, and the base is whitish. The ha‘r 67 in the annuli of toe tail is nearly corn-colored throughout. The under- fur is of a light, sooty tinge, growing much darker on the hind legs. The eats are grayish-white. The result of the sub-terminal whitish annulation of the hairs is a light gray, which is the prevailing color. The under parts are a similar gray, without the tips; here, as in the rest of the body, the dull-brown under-fur shows through. The intervals between the black rings of the tail are grayish-white; they are usually a trifle wider than the black rings. The tail is uniform (about 23 to 3 inches); the end rounded. Distribution and Habits—This well known animal is abundant in the eastern United States, and has been observed in Colorado. It is common in Ohio, usually found in the vicinity of water. It is said to be an expert at catching crayfish and minnows. It is very destructive to green corn, especially the sweet varieties. When once “treed,” they are readily taken—if in holes, by a wire hook driven into a long pole and thrust down to the bottom of the nest. In their blind rage they seize the hook and are easily drawn out, thrown to the ground, and dispatched. The animal is often domesticated; but they make rather savage and treacherous pets, stealing chickens that venture near their chain. A western form takes its place on the Pacific coast, P. hernandezii, Wag- ler, the California or Black-footed Raccoon. ORDER UNGULATA. SUB-ORDER ARTIODACTYLA. Toes paired; the third and fourth sub-equal and exserted; fifth and second about equal in size and position, and developed or atrophied in nearly equal degree ; dorso-lumbar vertebree usually nineteen ; intermax- illaries flattened toward the symphysis ; incisors, when present, diverging toward their roots; stomach more or less subdivided or complex; cecum comparatively small and simple. , FAMILIES OF ARTIODACTYLA. Molars with two doubie crescentiform folds, with the convex surfaces internal; canines resembling and parallel with incisors (different in Camelide); digestive system adapted for rumination; stomach quadripartite; axis with odontoid process like a spout or hollow half-cylinder, and with a sharp, prominent semi-circular rim. (Flower.) (Pecora; or Ruminantia.) Hind limbs with femur inclosed within the integument; incisors deciduous from upper jaw, persistent in lower; cervical vertebra normal (not elongated as in Gtraffide); hinder limbs longer than fore limbs. a. Horns persistent (common to both sexes), and developed as sheaths of true ‘‘horn” on osseous cores originating from the frontal bones. BovipZ. aa. Horns solid, deciduous, peculiar to the rutting season, not encased in horn, more or less branched ; usually wanting in females. . . CERVID&. 68 FAMILY BOVIDA. The characters of the family are sufficiently indicated in the above Key. Genus Brson Smith. Form wassive ; head declined ; neck short ; legs stout ; molars compara- tively broad, without supplemental lobes; end of muzzle very broad, naked ; nostrils widely separated ; hoofs broad; ears large ; tail long. Bison AMERICANUS (Gmelin.) Smith. AMERICAN BISON, OR BUFFALO. 1788. Bos americanus, Gmelin, Syst. Nat., i, 204, 1788.—Desmarest, Nouv. Dict. Hist. Nat., iii, 531, 1816; Mammalogie, 496, pl. xliv, 1820. —Harlan, Fauna Amer., 268, 1825.—Godman, Amer. Nat. Hist., iii, 4, 1826.—Desmoulin, Dict. Class. Hist. Nat., ii, 865, 1822.— Richardson, Fauna Bor. Amer., i, 279, 1829.—Fischer, Synop. Mam., 495, 653, 1829.—Cooper, Month. Amer. Journ. Geol. and Nat. Hist., 1831, 44, 174, 207 (remains at Big Bone Lick, Ky.) ; Amer. Journ. Sci., xx, 371, 1831; Edinb. New Phil. Journ., xi, 358, 1831.—Doughty, Cab. Nat. Hist., ii, 169, pl. xiv, 1832.— Sabine, Franklin’s Journey, 668, 1833.—Wagher, Schreber’s Saug., v, 472, 1855.—Giebel, Saiug., 271, 1855.—Baird, Mam. N. Amer., 682, 1857; U. S. and Mex. Bound. Survey, pt. ii, 52, 1859. Newberry, Pacif. R. R. Expl. and Surveys, VI, iv, 72, 1857.— Suckley and Gibbs, ibid., XII, ii, 138, 1866.—Xantus, Zodl. Gar- ten, i, 109.—Allen, Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., xiii, 186, 1869; xvii, 39, 1874.—Coues and Yarrow, Expl. and Surv. West 100th Merid., vol. v, 67, 1876. 1748. Bison americanus, Catesby, Nat. Hist. Carolina, ii, App., 20, xxviii, 1743.—Brisson, Reg. Anim., Quad., 1756.—Smith, Griffith’s Cuv., v, 374, 1827.—DeKay, Nat. Hist. New York, Zodl., pt. i, 110, 1842.—Sundevall, Kong. Sv. Vet. Akad. Handl. for 1844, 208, 1846.—Gray, Knowsley’s Menag., 49, 1850; Cat. Mam. Brit. Mus., iii, 39, 1852; Hand-List of Edentate, Thick-skinned, and Ruminant Mam., 85, 1873 —Girard, Cat Bones of Mam. Brit. Mus., 230, 1862.—Turner, Proc. Zod]. Soc. London, xviii, 177, 1850.—Aud. & Bach., Quad. N. Amer., ii, 32, pls. lvi, lvii, 1851. Baird, Rep. U. 8. Pat. Off, Agricult., 1851, 124 (plate), 1852.— Leidy, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila., 1854, 200, 210; Extinct Mam. Faun. N. Amer., 571, 1869.—Allen, Bull. Essex Institute, VI, iii, 1865; Versuch einer natiir lichen Geschichte des Rinder, ii, 58. 69 1766. Bos bison var. b., Linn., Syst. Nat., i, 99, 1766—Kalm, Travels in N. Amer. (Forster’s Trans.), i, 297. 1784. “ Bos wrus var., Bodd., Elen. Anim., 1784.” 1845. Bos bison, Schintz, Synop. Mam., 482, 1845 (in part only). 1867. Bos binasus, Brandt, Zodgeographische und Paleontologische Bei- trage, 105, 1867 (in part only).—Lilljeborg, Fauna 6fers sveriges och Norges Ryggrad., i, 877, 1874 (in part only). Taurus mexicanus, Hernandez, Mexico, 598. Taurus quivirensis, Nieremb., Hist. Nat., 181, 182. 1819. Le bison [d’Ameriqué], Buffon, Hist. Nat., xi, 284, Suppl, iii, p]. v.— F. Cuvier & Geoffroy, Hist. Nat. des Mam., I, livr. xii, 1819; II, livr. xxvii; III, livr. xliv.—G. Cuvier, Reg. Anim., i, 170, 1817 ; Oss. Foss., 8d ed., iv, 117, 1825. 1867. American bison, Agassiz, Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., xi, 316, 1867. Buffalo, Cooper, Month. Amer. Journ. Geol., 1831, 174, 207 (remains at Big Bone Lick).—Knight, Amer. Journ. Sci., xxvii, 166, 1835 (remains at Big Bone Lick).—Lyell, Proc. Geol. Soc. London, iv, 36, 1843 (remains at Big Bone Lick). Description.— An adult measures about nine feet (two and three-fourths metres) from the muzzle to the insertion of the tail, and thirteen and one-half feet (about four and one-sixth metres) to the end of the tail, in- cluding the hairs, which extend about fifteen inches beyond the vertebra. The female measures about six and one-half feet (about two metres) from the muzzle to the insertion of the tail, and about seven feet (two and one- sixth metres) to the end of the tail, including the hairs, which extend about ten inches beyond the vertebre. The height of the male at the highest part of the hump, is about five and one-half to six feet (about two metres); of the female at the same point, about five feet (one and one-half metres). The height of the male at the hips, is about four and two-thirds feet (nearly one and one-half metres); of the female at the same point, about four and one-half feet (about one and one-third metres). Audubon states the weight of old males to be nearly two thousand pounds, that of full-grown fat females to be about twelve hundred pounds. The horms of the males are short, very thick at the base, and rapidly taper to a sharp point, which, in old individuals, becomes worn off on the lower side, and the end is often shortened by the same process, and.occa- sionally much splintered. Their direction is outward and upward, finally curving inward. The horns of the females are much smaller at the base, but nearly as long as in the males; but they taper very gradually, and are, hence, much slenderer, and are rather more incurved at the tips, where they are rarely abraded as in the males. The hoofs are short and broad, 70 those of the fore feet abruptly rounded at the end; those of the hind feet are much narrower and more pointed. The muffle is broad and naked, having much the same form as in the domestic ox. The short tail has the long hairs restricted to a tuft at the end. In winter the head, neck, legs, tail, and whole under parts are blackish brown; the upper surface of the body lighter. The color above becomes gradually lighter towards spring; the new, short hair in autumn is soft dark-umber, or liver-brown. In very old individuals, the long, woolly hair over the shoulders bleaches to a light yellowish-brown. Young animals are generally wholly dark-brown, darkest about the head, on the lower surface of the body, and on the limbs. The young calf is at first nearly uniform light chestnut-brown, or yellowish-brown, with scattered darker hairs on the belly, where are also occasionally small patches of white. Toward autumn the light yellowish color is replaced by a darker brown that characterizes the older animals. After the first few months the younger animals are darker than they are later in life; at middle age the coat, especially over the shoulders, becomes lighter, and pre- sents a bleached or faded appearance, which increases with age. The horns, hoofs, and muffle are black, the hoofs being sometimes edged or striped with whitish. The woolly hair over the shoulders is much longer, and more shaggy than elsewhere on the body; it increases in length on the neck above, gradually losing its woolly character, and between the horns attains a length of ten to fourteen inches, nearly concealing the ears and the bases of the horns, and often partially covers the ears. The long hair advances also on the face, where it decreases in length and becomes more woolly again, extending far forward in a pointed area nearly to the nose. The chin and throat are also covered with long hair, which under the chin forms an immense beard eight or ten inches to a foot or more in length. Thick masses of long hair also arise from the inner and posterior surfaces of the upper part of the fore legs, where the hair often attains a length of six or eight inches. A strip of long hair also extends along the crest of the back nearly to the tail. The tail is cov- ered with only short, soft hair till near the tip, from which arises a tuft of coarse, long hair, twelve to eighteen inches in length. The hinder and lower portions of the body and legs are covered with a short, soft, woolly hair. This is moulted early in spring, aftér which, for a few weeks, the hinder portions of the body are quite or nearly naked. The shoulders retain permanently the long, shaggy covering, which, with the long hair of the neck and head, gives them (especially during the moult- ing season) a singularly formidable aspect. The female, as already stated, is much smaller than the male, with a 71 less elevated hump; much smaller, slenderer, and more curved horns; less heavily developed beard; less shaggy head, etc.; but presents no essential difference in color. Albinism and Melanism.—Pied individuals are occasionally met with, but they are of rare occurrence. I have seen but a single specimen, the head of which, finely mounted, is now in the Museum of Comparative Zodlogy. I obtained it from Fort Hayes, Kansas, near which place it was taken in 1870, where it was regarded as a great curiosity. In this specimen (a female), the whole face, from between the horns to the muzzle, is pure white, but in other respects does not differ from ordinary examples. White individuals are still more rare, but are not unknown. A former agent of the American Fur Company, who had unusually favorable oppoitunities of judging, informed me that they probably occur in the proportion of not more than one in millions, he having seen but five in twenty years, although he had met with hundreds of pied ones. Black ones are rather more frequent, but can only be regarded as rare. The fur of these is usually much finer and softer than that of ordinary indi- viduals; and black robes, from this fact and their. great rarity, bring a very large price. They seem to be more frequent at the northward than elsewhere. Varieties. —There are two commonly recognized varieties of the buffalo, known respectively as the Wood Buffalo and the Mountain Buffalo. The Wood Buffalo is described by Hind as larger than the Common Bison of the plains, with very short, soft pelage, and soft, short, uncurled mane, resembling, in these points, the Lithuanian Bison, or Auroch. It is said to be very scarce, and to be found only north of the Saskatch- ewan, and along the flanks of the Rocky Mountains, and to never ven- ture into the plains. A supposed variety of Bison, referred to by some of the northern voyagers as occurring north of Great Slave Lake, and known only from vague rumors current among the natives, is, in all probability, the Musk Ox (Ovibos moschatus). (J. A. Allen.) Synonomy and Nomenclature—The American Bison has been known by the specitic name americanus, adopted from Catesby in 1748, coupled with the generic name of either Bos or Bis. It thus forms almost the only example among North American Mammals of a species that never had a prominent synonym. In the United States this species is usually called the Buffalo, and this term will doubtless never be supplanted. Its correct English name is doubtless American Bison, the name Buffalo being strictly applicable only to the genus Bubalus of Africa and India. The English colonists, 72 however, following after Lawson and Catesby, adopted the term Buffalo, which is now its accepted common name, and no more a misnomer than is ““Rabbit” for the American Hare, or “Robin” as applied to Turdus migra- torus. Distribution The range of the Bison formerly extended from Great Slave Lake, latitude 62°, to the north-eastern provinces of Maine, and as far south at latitude 25°. In British North America the range extended from the Rocky Moun- tains to a line running south-eastward from Great Slave Lake to the Lake of the Woods. In the United States it extended west of the Rocky Mountains, even to the Sierra Nevada ranges. Within fifty years it occupied the country about the headwaters of the Green and Grand Rivers. East of the Rocky Mountains its range extended southward far beyond the Rio Grande, and eastward throughout the region drained by the Ohio River and its tributaries. Its north :rn limit east of the Mississippi was the Great Lakes, along which it extended east ward to near the eastern end of Lake Erie. It is known to have occurred south of the Tennes- see and east of tbe Alleghanies, chiefly in the upper districts of North and South Carolina. The present range of the Bison is in two distinct and comparatively small areas—the northern, from the sources of the principal southern tributaries of the Yellowstone, northward into the British possessions, embracing an area not much greater than the present territory of Mon- tana; the southern district is chiefly limited to Western Kansas, a part of the Indian Territory, and North-western Texas—a region about equal to the present State of Texas. The Bison in Ohio.—Mr. J. A. Allen has in his memoir a very detailed account of the distribution of the Buffalo and the history of its extermi- nation in the region of the Mississippi, drawn from the early histories and explorations. Vaudreuil, writing about 1720, in his “Memoirs of the Indians between Lake Erie and the Mississippi,” speaks of the abundance of Buffalo on the Sandusky and Onio Rivers. La Hanton, in his description of Lake Erie, about 1687, says : “‘T can not express what quantities of deer and turkeys are to Le fuund in these woods and in the vast woods that lie upon the south side of the lake. At the bottom of the lake we find beeves upon the banks of two pleasant rivers that disembouge into it with- out cataracts or rapid currents.” Vaudreuil, in 1718, says of Lake Erie: ‘There is no need of fasting on either side of this lake, deer are to be found there in such abundance. Buffaloes are found on the south, but not on the north shore.” 73 And again: ‘Thirty leagues up the river (Maumee) is a place called La Glaise (now Defiance, Ohio), where buffaloes are always to be found; they eat the clay and wallow in it.” The eastern limit along the Lakes was probably in Western New York, in the locality of Buffalo Creek, which empties into Lake Erie. There are, however, doubtful allusions in earlier writings of its occurrence along the southern shore of Lake Ontario. There is ample evidence of the former existence and abundance of the Buffalo in Northern Ohio; it occurred in other parts of the State. Colonel John May met with it on the Muskingum in 1788, and Atwater says “we had once the bison and the elk in vast numbers all over Ohio.” Hutchins says that in the natural meadows, or savannahs, “from twenty to fifty miles in circuit,” from the mouth of the Kanawha far down the Ohio the herds of Buffalo and Deer were innumerable, as also in the region drained by the Scioto. Mr. George Grabam, writing Mr. Allen, under date of “Cincinnati, April 11, 1876,” states : “That the last reliable killing of buffalo is taken from the Lacross manuscripts, and partly from tradition from the lips of the children and grandchildren of those who were present. Of the French who settled at Gallipolis, Ohio, in 1790, but one person ever killed a buffalo. This man’s name was Duteil. He was out hunting in the summer of 1795, about two miles west from Gallipolis, and saw a herd of buffalo. He fired with- out aiming at any particular one, and luckily killed a large one. He was so elated with this feat that, without stopping to examine the animal, he ran as fast as he could to the town, and, having announced his luck, came back followed by the entire body of colon- ists, men, women, and children. They quickly formed a procession, with musicians playing violins, flutes, and haut-boys in front of the fortunate hunter, proudly marching with his gun on his shoulder, and the animal swinging from poles thrust through between his tied feet, followed by the crowd, singing and rejoicing at the prospect of good and hearty fare. ‘The animal was quickly skinned and dressed on its arrival at the town, and for sev- eral days there was feasting, as the first and last buffalo of Gallipolis was served up in such a variety of ways and means as none but the French could devise; Charles Francis Duteil remaining until his death the renowned marksman who killed the first and last buffalo, of ali the emigrants from France, who settled the town of Gallipolis.” In a later communication to Mr. Allen, Mr. Graham adds: ‘From all that I know of the early settlement and history of the West, I am under the impression that the buffalo disappeared from Ohio, Illinois, Indiana, and Kentucky about the year 1800.” Hatirpation of the Bison.—The Buffalo was not driven to the westward by the encroachments of settlements; a few herds may have migrated, but it is more probable it was exterminated, rather than driven from the central States. 74 It existed in West Virginia and eastern Kentucky as late, or even later, than on the prairies adjoining the Mississippi. The animal sur- vived at most points only a few years after the first permanent settle- ments were made. Its history east of the Mississippi is not different from its history in the two small areas to which it is now confined—“a shameful record of wasteful and wanton destruction of life, like that which ever marks the contact of man with the larger mammals.” Mr. Thomas Ashe, in his “Travels in America,” performed in 1806, speaks of the great abundance and wanton destruction of Buffalo in the vicinity of Oil Creek and Clarion Creek, Pennsylvania. An old man informed My. Ashe that he and his companion killed several hundred near a salt spring for the sake of their skins, worth but two shillings each. The stench was so great they were compelled to leave the place until the carcasses were devoured or abandoned by wild beasts and birds. “The simple history of this spring,” says Mr. Ashe, “is that of every other in the settled parts of this Western World; the carnage of beasts was eyerywhere the same. I met with a man who had killed two thous- and Buffaloes with his own hand, and others, no doubt, have done the same. In consequence of such proceedings not one Buffalo is at this time (in 1806) to be found east of the Mississippi, except a few domesti- cated by the curious, or carried through the country as a public show.” This last statement refers, doubtless, to the Mississippi below latitude 40° ; the Buffalo did not retire to the northward of the Illinois River, according to Breckenridge, until in 1814, and Sibley states, in School- craft’s Indians, that two individuals were killed in 1832 by the Sioux Indians on the Trempeleau River, in Upper Wisconsin, and adds: “They are believed to be the last specimens of the noble Bison which trod, or will ever again tread, the soil of the region lying east of the Mississippi River.” Inasmuch as all the larger species of mammalia are everywhere disap- pearing as civilization progresses, and as large areas are brought under cultivation the faunal and floral character of a country are essentially modified, it seems essential to preserve in the State reports and archives as full and accurate reports as can be obtained of the earlier conditions and distribution of animal life in each great faunal area, so that com- parisons with present conditions and limitations may be instituted, and the history of the successive changes noted. With this object in view, I have quoted freely from Mr. J. A. Allen’s history of the American Bison, and shall introduce here Prof. N. 8. Shaler’s observations on the age of the Bison im the Ohio Valley, which constitute Appendix ITI. of Mr. Allen’s history: 75 “The springs at Big Bone Lick, as at all other licks of Kentucky, are sources of saline waters derived from the older Palwozoic rocks. The saline materials, as has been sug- gested by Dr. Sterry Hunt, have their origin in the imprisoned waters of the ancient seas, cr in the salts derived therefrom, which have been locked in the depths of the strata below the reach of the leaching action of the surface water. Whenever the rocks lie above the line of drainage, these salts have been leached away. As we go below the surface they increase in quantity until we reach the level, where these waters remain saturated with the materials which existed in the old sea waters. The displace- ment of these old imprisoned waters is brought about by the sinking down of water on the highlands through the vertical interstices of the soil and rock and the consequent tendency of the water below the surface to restore the hydrostatic balance. This action is particulazly likely to occur when the rocks above the drainage are limestones or shales; while a bed of rock at some distance below the drainage is of sandstone, and permeable to water. “This is the case at Big Bone Lick, where, at about two hundred feet below the sur- face, we have the calciferous sandstone, with a structure open enough to admit the free passage of water in a horizontal direction. That some such process is at work, is shown by the fact that the water will rise ten feet or more above the surface of the soil if en- closed in a pipe. The fact that the reservoir of these waters is below the general sur- face, causes them to appear in the bottom of the valleys, and the considerable abstrac- tion of matter from the underlying beds probably amounts to some hundred cubie feet per annum in the case of Big Bone Lick, causes a depression at the point of escape, and brings about pretty generally the formation of a swamp in a depressed and constantly lowering basin, through which the spring water seeps away, and where a large part of it is usually evaporated. This swamp forms a natural trap for all the higher mammalia init. When excavations are made near the existing outlets of the springs, we find the remains of large mammals brought by man, the horse, cow, pig, and sheep. “In the frequent change of outlet of these springs, it comes to pass that at many points near the surface of the thirty or forty acres that lie in the little basin where Big Bone Lick is found, there are old spring vents, about which bones are found, that no longer give forth saline waters. It is a fact bearing on the history of the Buffalo, that their remains about Big Bone Lick are, when found, away from the purest springs, and never at any depth beneath the surface. In the recent springs they are very abundant, but not much more ancient in their appearance than the domesticated animals. The evidence obtained at this point leads to the conclusion that the first appearance of this species into the country was singularly recent, and also shows that their coming was like an irruption in its suddenness. These Buffalo bones are wonderfully abundant in some of the shallow swampy places of this neighborhood. I have seen them massed to the depth of two feet or more, as close as the stones of a pavement, and so beaten down by the succeeding herds as to make it difficult to lift them from their bed. ‘ As will be seen from the accompanying diagram, there seems to have been some de- gradation of the surface of this swamp after the deposition of many of the Mastodon remains, and before the coming of the Buffalo. / “This lowering of level was apparently consequent on the down-cutting of the bed of the small creek that drains the valley. The old elevated beds had probably washed @ good deat when the Buffalo came, but it was principally by its wallowing and stamp- ing that the bones of the Mastodon, Elephant, etc., were exposed to the air. At no point in this old ground did I find a trace of the Buffalo, though in some of it the bones identified by Mr. Allen as belonging to Ovibos were found. There, too, were found the 76 bones of the Moose and Caribou. I am inclined to believe, from these investigations, that the Bison americanus did not appear at Big Bone Lick, until a very recent time. “All the observations made by the Kentucky Survey, in the caverns of the State and the neighboring district of Tennessee, have led to the discovery of no Bison remains in these subterranean receptacles, where the bones of the Beaver, Deer, Wolf, Bear, and many other mammals have been discovered. The observations of the officers of the survey to be published hereafter, will show that our caves have been used as the homes of the living and the receptacles of the dead, by more than one of the earlier tribes of this region, bat they seem never to have brought the bones of this animal to the caves. “Some years ago, I ventured to call attention to the general absence of the remains of this animal in all the mounds of the historic races, and to the fact that on their pipes and pottery, though they figure every other indigenous mammal and some of the birds of this region, seeking their models even in the Manitee of Florica, I have never been able to find any trace of Buffalo bones in any of the mounds which so often contain bones of other animals, nor have I been able to ascertain that they have ever been found in such places. At an ancient camping-ground on the Ohio River, about twelve miles above Cincinnati, where the remains are covered by alluvial soil of apparently some antiquity, and where the pottery (hereafter to be figured in the memoirs of the survey) is rather more ancient in character than that made by our modern Indians, I found bones of Deer, Elk, Bear, Fox, etc., but none of Buffalo. At a number of other old camps on the Ohio River, there is the same conspicuous absence of the remains of this animal. These evidences, negative and incomplete as they are, make it at least probable that the Buffalo was unknown to the people who built the mounds and pre- ceded the tribes which were found here by the whites in the seventeenth century. The same argument warrants us in supposing that the Bison latifrons, with its contempora- ries, the Musk Ox, the Elephant, and the Mastodon, had vanished before the advent of this race, or at least before the time of which we have evidence in the fossils already found. “T have long been of the opinion, without claiming originality therein, that the tribes which built the mounds, and shapely, measured forts of this region, were driven to the southward, by an invasion of other tribes coming from the northward and north- westward. «Tn the memoirs now in preparation concerning the ancient peoples of this region, it will be claimed, on what seems to My Lucian Carr, Ethnologist of the Survey, and to myself, sufficient evidence that these mound-building people were essentially related to the Natchez group of Indians, and were driven southward by the ruder tribes of the somewhat related tribes which occupied the northern part of the Mississippi Valley when we first knew it. All this seems to me to have a possible significance in the problem of the coming of the Buffalo. When we remember that the Indians north of the Ohio were much in the habit of burning the forests, and so making open plains or prairies, and that, as Mr. Allen has well pointed out, the Buffalo cannot penetrate far into the denser forests, it may be that it was this destruction of forests that laid the way open to their entrance. The so-called barrens of Kentucky—the southward extension of the Wabash prairies—give us evidence on this point. As soon as the Indians were driven away, these Kentucky prairies sprang up in timber, and are now densely wooded. The same is in part true of other prairies of the Ohio Valley. I am inclined to think that the forcing back of the timber line from the Mississippi, is principally due to the burn- ing of the forests by the aborigines in their eastward working, aided by the continual a decrease of the rain-fall, which I believe to be a concomitant of the disappearance of the glacial period. “The question of the origin of the Buffalo, and its relation to the earliest tribes of people in this district, is made still more complicated by the fact that there is no doubt that there was an earlier and closely related species of Buffalo in this district, probably coeval with the Mammoth and Mastodon, and probably with the Caribou and Elk, which had doubtless disappeared before the coming of any race of men that has as yet been identified in this country. “(The succession of events in this region, as far as the species of Bison are concerned, seems to have been somewhat as follows, viz. ‘1, The existence of the Bieon latifrons with the Mammoth and its contemporaries, the Mastodon, Musk Ox (Boolherium cavifrons, Leidy), etc: This species, like its con+ temporaries, by its size gave evidence of the even climate and abundant vegetation of the time just following, and probably in part during the glacial period. “2. The disappearance of this fauna, followed by the coming of a race (mound builders) that retained no distinct traditions, and have left no art records of the presence of any of the large animals of the preceding time. ‘3, The disappearance of this race from the region north of the Tennessee, proba- bly leaving representatives in the Natchez group of Indians, followed by the occupation of the country by a race that greatly extended the limits of the treeless plains to the eastward, and so permitted the coming of the modern Bison into this region. “T have long been disposed to look upon the succeeding glacial periods as the most effective causes of the changes that led to the determination of new specific characters among animals; and I am strongly disposed to think that in the Bison americanus we have the descendant of the Bison latifrone, modified by existence in the new conditions of soil and climate to which it was driven by the great changes closing the last ice age. ‘When the exploration of Big Bone Lick is completed, it will doubtless show that there was an interval of some thousands of years between these two species.” FAMILY CERVIDA. These are herbivorous animals, having the stomach in four compart- ments, of the ordinary ruminant pattern. Dentition: i. $3; c¢. $$; pm. 3-3; m. 3-3. Horns deciduous, solid, more or less branched, developed from the frontal bone, covered, at first, by a soft, hairy integument (velvet). When the horns attain their full size (which they do in a very short time), there arises at the base of each a ring of tubercles known as the “burr”; this compresses, and finally obliterates the blood-vessels supply- ing the integument, which dries up and is stripped off, leaving the boné hard and insensible; the horns are sexual characters, wanting in the female, excepting in the Reindeer (and very rarely in the Common Deer, C. virgintanus); they are usually present in the male; they are shed an- nually, the separation of the beam from the pedicel taking place just below the burr. The Cervide are a widely distributed family, few regions being without one or more peculiar species; a notable proportion are found in the New 78 World. Eight or nine species are found in North America alone. There are three sub-families recognized, the Cervinz,with canines small or none including tise Moose, Reindeer, and Common Deer, and constituting the greater partof the family; the Cervaling, with the canine tooth of the male enlarged and tusk-like, and the Moschinz, or Musk Deer, of the Old World, without horns. The two species, here treated cf, fall in the first ot these three sub-families. KEY TO GENERA OF CERVIDS. * Horns, in males only, large, curving backward, with the snags ali directed forward, one of them immediately abeve the burr; tail very short; hoofs broad and rounded : size very large; muffle very high, and not separated from the lip by a hairy band ; a tuft of hair on outside of hind leg above middle of metatarsus. . . CERVUS. “* Horns in males—rarely found in females; muzzle broadly naked. Horns rather small, curving forward; first snag short, some distance above the base, and like the others curving upward. Tailrather long; hoofs rather elongate. Fur shorter and fulv- ous in summer, longer and grayish in winter. A narrow, short, naked, glandular space on the outer side of the metatarsus. . z ‘ . ‘ ~ CARIACUS. Genus Cariacus Gray. This Genus includes the Mule Deer, or Black-tailed Deer, C. macrotis (Gray), of the Rocky Mountain region, C. virginianus macrurus (Raf.) Coues, the White-tailed Deer, of general distribution in the West, associ- ated in most of its ranges with the Black-tailed Deer, the Dwarf Deer of Arizona, C. virginianus, var. cowest Rothrock, MSS., and the true C virgintanus, east of the Missouri, and north to Maine. CaARIACUS VIRGINIANUS (Bodd.) Gray. Virginia DEER; Rep DEER. 1784. Cervus virginianus, Beddaert, Elench. -An., i, 1784, 186.—Zimm., Penn. Arkt. Zodl., 1787, 31.—Gmelin, Syst. Nat., i, 1788, 179.— Kerr’s Linn., 1792, 299.—Schreb., Sdugt., v, 1836.—Shaw, Gen. Zool., ii, 1801, 284.—Desmarest, Mamm., ii, 1822, 442.—Harlan, F, Am., 1825, 238.—Godman, Am. N. H., ii, 306.—Doughty’s Cab. N. H., i, 1830, 8; pl. i, male, female, young.—De Kay, N. Y. Zodl., i, 1842, 113; pl. xxviii, f. i—Wagner, Suppl. Schreb., iy, 1844, 373.—Aud. & Bach., N. Am. Quad., ii, 1851, 220; pl. lxxxi,cxxxvi—Pucheron, Mon. Du Cerf., Arch. du Mus., vi, 1852, 305. Distribution.—This is the best known and most abundant of the Ameri- can Deer. According te Audubon and Bachman, it is not found north of Maine, from which limit it extends over the whole United States east of the Missouri river. Ti ig sti! Sund in+he mocntains of New York, Pennsylvania, Mary- 4 79 land, Virginia, Tennessee, and Kentucky, and even further south. On the Upper Missouri, and west, the Virginia Deer is replaced by an allied race, the White-tailed Deer, Cariacus virgintanus macrurus (Raf.) Coues. More northern specimens of the Virginia Deer are larger than those further south ; the Deer of the southern seacoast and its islands are smaller than those of the uplands and mountains of the same latitude. The Virginia Deer is rarely met with in Ohio at present, except as domesticated in parks. Description of this well-known animal seems unnecessary here, especi- ally since the publication of Judge Caton’s treatise on the Antelope and Deer of America. Genus Cervus Linneus. Generic characters as given in the Key to Genera. CERVUS CANADENSIS Erxleben. WaPITI; OR AMERICAN ELK. 1756. Cervus canadensis, Briss., Quad., 1756, 88. 1777. Cervus elaphus, var. canadensis, Erxl.,Syst.,1777,305.—Bedd., Elench. Anim., 1784, 135. 1809. Cervus wapiti, Barton, Am. Philos. Trans., vi, 1809, 70. 1815. Cervus major, Ord, Guthrie’s Geog., 2d Am. ed., 1815. 1827. Cervus (Elaphus) canadensis, Griff, An. King., v. 1827, 308. 1835. Cervus canadensis, Schreb., Siugt., v, 1835, 990, pl. 246, A.—Desmar., Mamm., ii, 182, 483.—Harlan, Fn. Amer.. 1825, 2836—Godman, Aw. Nat. Hist., ii, 1831, 294.—Maxim.. Reise, ii, 1839, 24, 84.— Gray, P. Z. S, 1850, 226.—Giebel., Sadugt., 1855, 348. -—Baird, Mamm., N. A., 1857, 338, f. 9 and 10. 1836. Cervus strongyloceras, Schreb., Siug., v, 1886, pl. 247, F, G.—Rich., Fn. Bor. Am., i, 1829, 251. 1842. Elaphus canadensis, De Kay, N. Y. Zoél., i, 1842, 118, pl. 18, f. 2— Aud. & Bach., Q. N. A., ii, 1851, 84, pl. 62—Baird, Agric. Rep. U.S. Pat. Office, 1851-2, 116. Specific Characters.—Hoofs short, broad and rounded. Tail short and depressed. Larmiers nearly as long as eye; naked portion of the muz- zle inferiorly only half as wide as the septum of the nostrils. No naked glandular space on the outer edge of the hind-legs, but a short, whitish patch of hairs near the upper part of the metatarsus. In summer, ground color light chesnut-red, darkest on the neck and legs; throat and median ventral line dusky, almost black. Chin dusky, with a narrow patch of light-yellowish on either side; a broad, median, 80 yellowish patch under the head. Rump yellowish+«white, bordered by a dusky band, which extends down the posterior face of the hind-legs; winter colors more gray. The Elk ranges in northern latitudes from the Atlantic to the Pacific. Northward, it extends, according to Richardson, as far as the 57th par- allel. Baird remarks (1657) that the only well-ascertained eastern locali- ties are the Allegheny regions of Pennsylvania and Virginia; the fact of its occurrence in New York being very uncertain. It is still found in the vicinity of Green Bay, Wisconsin (B. H. Van Vleck), in Minnesota, the Yellowstone region, and west. ‘Their occurrence in Ohio, and also their comparative abundance, is attested by their remainsand by authentic parties. From “History of Ohio,” by C. Atwater, 1888, I quote: “ When Circleville was first settled the carcasses, or rather skeletons, of fifty in- dividuals of the family of Elk lay scattered about on the surface.” Also, by same author: “We had an abundance of Deer, and they are common yet in the newer parts of the State. They are the common Red Deer.” The prevalence uf Elk is noticed in 1760, in what is now Clark county. “Historical Collections of Ohio,” by Henry Howe, Cin., 1848,” Also, in the History of State of Ohio, Taylor, 1854, Journal of Maj. John Rogers, Jan./ 1761, is found: “Killed in our march this day three hears and two elk.” (Voyage along Coast of Lake Erie.) As to their extermination the following is taken: “A History of Athens County, Ohio—Walker, 1869,” page 112: ‘The buffalo and elk were not exterminated until about the year 1800.” Hildreth states that ‘the Indians had not quite exterminated the buffalo and the elk,” (1797.) And from Dr. Kirtland’s Report on Mammals, in Geol. Survey of Ohio, 1838: “The Elk was frequently to be met with in Ashtabula county until within the last six years. I learn from Col. Harper, of that county, that one was killed there as recently as October of the present season.” SUPER-ORDER INEDUCABILIA. ORDER CHIROPTERA. The Bats have the anterior members adapted for flight ; the humerus is long and slender, the ulna rudimentary, attached to the curved radius, which constitutes the bulk of the forearm; the carpus is composed of six bones ; the metacarpal bones, five in number, are much elongated, as are the phalanges, which are two to five in number—usually two. The bones of the arm and hand support a thin, leathery skin, arising from the sides of the body and extending backwards on the hind members down to their tarsi, and including the tail. Tail usually of nine joints; the interfemoral membrane may or may not include the tip of the tail. The nervous system is highly developed, especially the special senses of hearing and touch. The ears, externally and internally, are highly per- fected. The auricles of the insectivorous Bats are frequently much larger than the head, and of great variety of shapes, their variations in form being of great importance in classification. The nose is, in many Bats, the seat of extensive dermal growths, composed of reduplications of the skin, which probably act conjointly with the wing-membranes to aug- ment the sense of touch. The skeleton is noted for its lightness and tenuity, the bones of the Little Brown Bat weighing but eleven grains. The teeth vary from thirty to thirty eight, which, combined with the marked differences in their contour, furnish important characters in classification. The sternum is of great strength and excessive develop- ment, the immense power employed in their active flight necessitating the presence of strong osseous points for the attachment of muscles. The whole structure is adapted to the habits of the animal. The great devel- opment of the ribs, sternum, and scapula, for the attachment of muscles of flight; tne length and strength of the clavicle, and the long bones of the anterior extremity fulfill an obvious purpose. The digestive appa- ratus is simple, corresponding to their animal regimen. Some foreign species are strictly frugivorous; our species subsist on insects, mainly the crepuscular and nocturnal kinds, as Gnats, Moths, Mosquitoes, and even the heavily mailed Coleoptera. “The disappearance of the birds of day,” says Dr. Allen, “is a signal for the advent of the dusky host, which, as it were, temporarily relieve from duty their more brilliant rivals in guarding the interests of Na- ture.” 6 82 The relations of this order.of mammals to superstition, while no legit- imate part of the present history, is very interesting, and is here tran- scribed from the facile pen of Dr. H. Allen: ‘‘Attendant as they are upon the quiet hours of twilight, when the thickening gloom is conducive to the development of superstitious feeling, Bats have always been associ- ated with ideas of the horrible and the unknown. In olden times, when the imagina- tion of the people exceeded the accuracy of their observations, it was one of the numerous monsters inhabiting their caverns and forests. It has done service in many a legend; its bite was fatal; it was the emblem of haunted houses; its wings bore up the dragon slain by St. George; its image is-rudely carved upon the tombs of the ancient Egyptians; the Greeks consecrated it to Proserpine; it is part of the infernal potion of the witches of Macbeth, while Ariel employs it in his erratic flights. In art, its wings ‘have entered largely into the creation of those composite horrors—evil spirits ; nor have modern artists escaped the absurdity of encumbering the Satan of Holy Writ with like appendages. Bat of this association with the monstrous, the intelligent observer ceases to take note, when the finer beauties of structure develop themselves under his gaze. Upon acquaintance, he learns that in anatomical and physiological peculiarities, and zoblogical position, the Bat is a subject for study worthy the attention of the most con- ‘emplative.” FAMILIES OF CHIROPTERA. * Bats without upright appendage on the nose. (Gymnorhina.) t Nostrils sub-elliptical; wing-membranes ample ; tail completely enclosed in the in- terfemoral membrane, or the final joint only in some instances exserted. VESPERTILIONIDE. FAMILY VESPERTILIONIDA. The above characters separate our largest family of North American Bats from the free-tailed Noctilionide, which have the nostrils circular, the alar membrane narrow, and the tail either much longer or shorter than the interfemoral membrane; also, from the single North American species of the Leaf-nosed Bats, Phyllostomatidx, which are readily recognized by the upright appendage surmounting the rostrum. The latter family is represented by the Leaf-nosed Bat, Macrotus waterhousii, Gray, of the West Indies, Mexico, and the southern border of the United States. GENERA OF VESPERTILIONIDA. * Cheess without excrescences; ears moderate. 2 ° 2 + Incisors =. . 7 ‘ ‘ ‘ 3 Fi ‘ ‘ . VESPERTILIO. -3 . 1-1 tt Incisors 3-3 - ¥ i ‘ 4 ¥ ‘ 4 ‘ 4 ‘ ATALAPHA. Genus VesPERTILIO (Linn.) Auct. Vespertilio, Linn., of authors. Scotophilus, Leach, Trans. Linn. Soc., xiii, 1822, 71.—Allen, Monog., 27. Vesperus, Keys. and Blas., Wirb. Eur., 1840, 49. Vesperides, Coues, antea. 83 Generic Characters. —Dentition: i. $2; ¢ tb; m. £4, or 3:8, or 2:3, or 8:8 teeth in all, 32, 34,36,or38. Known from all othersof the family by the four, instead of two, upper incisors. Four sub-genera are based on the vary- ing molar dentition. Our species fall in the sub-genus Vesperus (m. 2-8), VESPERTILIO SUBULATUS Say. LitTLE BROWN Bat. 1828. Vispertilio subulatus, Say, Longs Expl R. Mts., 1823, 65.—Harlan, Fn. Am., 1825, 22.—Rich., F. B. A., i, 1829, 3.—Godman, Am. Nat. Hist., i, 1831, 71—Cooper, Ann. Lyc. N. Y., 1837, iv,61.—De Kay, Nat. Hist., N. Y., 1842, 8—LeConte, Proc. Phila. Acad., 1855, 436.—H. Allen, Monog., 51.—J. A. Allen, Bull. Mus. Com. Zo6]., i, 210.—Id., Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., xvii, June, 1874.— Jordan, Man. Vert., 1878, 22—Coues and Yarrow, Geog. and Geolog. Exp]. and Surv. West 100th Merid., v, 1875, 96. 1885. Vespertilio cavoli, Ten m., Monog., ii, 1835, 236. —. Veszertilio demesticus, Greene, Cab. Nat. Hist., ii, 290. Specific Characters.—Length 3 inches, often less; expanse of wings, 8 to 9; tail about 1.50; fore-arm equal tail; longest linger 2 to 2.56; ear usu- ally .40, but from .30 to .75. Molars $$; teeth 38 in all; upper incisors paired off close to canines, a median space intervening; middle pair markedly bifid, the lateral ones obscurely or not so; lower canines with small basal cusp posteriorly; first two upper premolars small, last one arger, compressed, and bicuspid, the large outer cusp longer than any point of the true molars; lower premolars small, especially the two front ones. Skull thin and papery, crestless, with inflated cranial, and prolonged rostral part, giving a small face, high forehead, pointed muzzle, and foxy or terrier-like physiognomy. Face moderately whiskered. Ears rather large, oval in general contour. Tragus about half as high as auricle; upright, or nearly so; lanceolate. Extreme tip of tail more or iess obvi- ously exserted. Interfemoral membrane naked on dorsal surface, except a triangular patch of fur at its base, continuous with the covering of the back. Wing-membranes naked, very delicate, thin, almost diaphanous ; usually rather brown than blackish. Fur dark plumbeous at base; at tip varying from quite dark to yellowish-brown, usually palest on the belly. The Little Brown Bat is one of the two most abundant North Amer- ican Bats. Dr. Coues states that as many as ten thousand, by actual count, have been destroyed in one building. The same author in- cludes in this species several forms described either by Dr. Allen, Le- Conte, or others, as distinct species. Two varieties of ordinary subulatus, however, are recognizable: one, evotis, slender, with large ears and pointed snout ; the other, lucifugus, stout, with smaller ears and blunted snout. 84 VESPERTILIO NocTIVAGANS. LeConte. SILVER Biack Bar. 1831. Vespertilio noctivagans, LeConte, McMurtrie’s Cuv., i, 1831, 33.— Cooper, Ann. Lyc. N. Y., iv, 1887, 59.—De Kay, Nat. Hist. N. Y., 1842, 9, pl. i, f. i—Wagner, Suppl. Schreb., v, 1855, 754.—Jor- dan, Man. Vert., 1878, 22. 1831. Scotophilus auduboni, Harlan, Month. Am. Jour., i, 1831, 220, pl. 2.— Med. and Phys. Res., 1835, 30, pl. 4. 18385. Vespertilio pulverulentus, Temm., Monog. Mamm., ii, 1835, 235.— LeConte, Proc. Phila. Acad., 1855, 435.—Maxim., Arch. Naturg., 1861, 192 ——. Scotophilus noctivagans, H. Allen, Monog., 39.—J. A. Allen, Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., xvii, 1874. 1857. Vespertilio (Vesperides) noctivagans, Coues and Yarrow, Geog. and Geolog. Expl. and Surv. West 100th Merid., v, 1875, 95. Specific Characters—_Length 3; extent 12; tail 1.25 to 1.50; shin 50; arm 1.50; longest finger 2.75; ear .50; tragus about .16. Molars 2% (only species with 36 as the total number); central upper incisors bicuspid. ‘Skull flat; not crested; two shallow depressions anteriorly. Base of foot without the rounded lateral swelling of Vesperus. Tragus short, broad, and blunt; hardly or not one-half as high as auricle. Ear irregularly oval, inner border running upward and inward to level of head, then upward and outward, ending obtusely ; outer border below folded irregu- larly, bending inward so as to touch the tragus. Snout naked; nostrils wide apart; opening sub-laterally; space between emarginate. Fem- oral membrane entirely, though scantily, furred on dorsal surface, with numerous minute tufts arranged linearly on central surface. Thumb small, slightly furry. Fur long and silky; black, or nearly so; the ends of the hairs usually white or whitish, giving a peculiar powdery aspect; sometimes entirely black. This species inhabits North America at large. It is said to be related to V. discolor, of Europe. Its dentition and peculiar coloration charac- terize it distinctly. Mr. J. A. Allen gives it as common in Massachu- setts; Dr. Allen limits it to the middle regions of North America. Like most of the family, however, it is doubtless of general and extensive ‘distribution. VESPERTILIO (VESPERUS) FUSCUS Beauvois. CaROLINA BROWN Bat. 1796. Vespertilzo fuscus, Palisot de Beauvois, Cat. Peale’s Mus., 1796, 14.— LeConte, Proc. Phil. Acad., 1855, 484.—Jordan, Man. Vert., 1878, 23. 85 1806. Vespertilio carolinensis, Geoffroy St. Hilaire, Ann. du Mus., 1806, viii, 198, pl. xlvii, f. 7—Harl., Fn. Am., 1825, 9—Godman, Am. Nat. Hist., i, 1831, 67.—LeConte, McMurt. Cuv., i, 1831, 431.— Cooper, Aun. Lyc. N. Y., iv, 1837, 60.—DeKay,N. Y. Fn., i, 1842, pl. 2, f. 1.—Desm., Mam., i, 1820, 186.—Temm., Man., ii, 1835, 237.—LeConte, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila., 1855, 434.—Wag- ner, Suppl. Schreber, v, 1855, 753.—Woodhouse, Sitgr. Rep. Zufii and Col. Rivers, 1854, p. 43. 1818. Vespertilio phaiops, Rafinesque, Am. Month. Mag., 1818, 445.—Le: Conte, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila., 1855, 484—Wagner, Suppl. Schreber, 1855, 756. 1823. Vespertilio arcuatus, Say, Long’s Exped , 1823, 167. 1835. Vespertilio ursinus, Temm.. Mon. Mamm., ii, 1835, 235.—LeConte, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila., 1855, 434. 1875. Vespertilio (Vesperus) fuscus, Coues and Yarrow, Geog. and Geolog. Expl. and Surv. West 100th Merid., v, 1875, 92. Scotophilus carolinensis, Allen, Monog., 28. Specific Characters—Length 38 to 4; tail 1.83 to 1.50; extent 10 to 12; longest finger 2.66 to 3; arm 1.50 to 2; ear about .50 in height; molars +3—Tront upper one narrowest, the front lower ones smaller than the other three ; incisors $3—lateral upper pair smaller than central pair; base of foot with a rounded swelling; tip of tail exserted; wing-mem- brane reaching base of toes; no extension of fur on the wing membrane; leg membrane furred at basal fifth on upper side, elsewhere more or less perfectly naked ; ears moderate, furred one-half to one-third up the back, turned more or less outward, with convex inner and straight or slightly emarginated outer border, and well developed basal lobe; tragus nearly half as high as auricle, its tip never pointed, outer border notched near the base; nostrils emarginate; head flat; hairs dark-plumbeous, or dark- cinereous on the basal part, a variable shade of brown at the ends, and usually lighter on the under surface of the body than on the upper. Distribution —Reported from widely separated localities in the United States; from Cincinnati by Mr. F. W. Langdon. - Genus ATALAPHA Rafinesque. , Atalapha, Nycticejus, Lasiurus, Rafinesque. Nycticejus et Lasiurus, Allen, Monog., 11.14. Generic Characters —Adult dentition: 1. 3:3; ¢ 7; m. $3 (subg. Nycti- cejus), or $% (subg. Lasiwrus)=30 or 32 teeth. The variable tooth is the anterior premolar, absent in Nycticejus, present in Lasiurus, but minute and liable to be overlooked, as it is hidden by the approximation of the next premolar to the canine. € 86 The above characterization, by Dr. Coues, includesja group of bats agreeing in the absence, when alult, of median upper incisors, and so differing from the species of Vespertilio. Regarding the name Afalapha, the same author says: “Among Rafinesque’s names we adopt Atalapha, which he says contains ‘bats without fore teeth” (i. e., lacking the mid- dle upper incisors)—an expression, it is true, not accurate, but still in- telligible; and, in the case of this writer’s work, we have generally to choose between inaccuracy and unintelligibility, excepting when what he says is both erroneous and enigmatical.” ATALAPHA (LASIURUS) NOVEBORACENSIS (Erxl.) Coues. Rep Bat; New Yori Bat. 1777. Vespertilio noveboracensis, Erxleben, Syst. Anim., 1777, 184.—Har- lan, Fn. Amer., 1825, 20.—Godman, Am. Nat. Hist., i, 1831, 68. —Cooper, Ann. Lyc. N. Y., 1837, 57.—D2Kay, Nat. Hist. N. Y.. 1842, 6, pl. ii—LeConte, Proc. Phila, Acad., 1855, 432. 1788. Vespertilio lasturus, Gmelin, S. N., 1788, 50. 1796. Vespertilio rubellus, Beauvois, Cat. Peale’s Mus., 1796. 1806. Vespertilio villossistmus, Geoffroy, Ann. Mus., viii, 1806, 478. 1817. Vespertilio monachus and. tesselatus, Raf., Am. Month. Mag., iv, 18L7, 445, 1825. Taphyzous rufus, Harlan, Fo. Am., 1825, 23. 1829. Vespertilio blossevillit, Less. et Garn., Bull. Sc. Nat., viii, 95. 1831. Nycticejus noveboracensis, LeConte, McMurtrie’s Cuv., 1831, 432. 1835. Nycticejus varius, Poeppig, Reise Chili, i, 1835, 451. 1842. Lasiurus rufus, Gray, List. Mamm. Br. Mus., 1848, 32. 1855. Nycticejus lasiurus, Wagner, Suppl. Schreb., v, 1855, 772. 1857. Lasiurus noveboracensis, Tomes, Proc. Zodl. Soc., 1857, 34—Allen, Monog., 16. 1875. Atalapha (Lasiurus) noveboracensis, Coues and Yarrow, Geog. and Geolog Expl. and Surv. West 100th Merid., v, 1875, 87. - Red Bat, Wilson; New York Bat, Pennant. Description.—Length about 3.75 inches; tail 1.75 to 2.00; extent of wings 1050 to 12.90; shin .75; arm 1.66; longest finger 3.88 ; ear .33 to .50 high. Teeth 32; molars $; front upper premolars hidden by being wedged between the next and the canine ; upper incisors small, strongly convergent ; lower ones crowded ; lower canines pointing backward. Tail entirely included in femoral membrane ; head and face hairy ; nose blunt, rounded, with semi-lateral nostrils. Ears nearly circular ; tragus half as high as auricle, straight on inner border, the end obtuse and abruptly tuaned. Wings furry in patches; body fur extending to base of third 87 finger ; a conspicuous white tuft at the shoulder, and another at the base of the thumb. Femoral membrane above densely furry, like the back ; under surface one-half furred. Fur long and silky; each hair plumbeous at base, then yellowish-brown, passing to reddish or chocolate, and usually white at the tip. Males bright yellowish-red; females have the light red replaced by dark russet, with the whitish tips longer than in the males. . Regarding the abundance, movements, and general appearance of the Bats in general, and particularly of our two most abundant species, I transcribe the following, evidently from the pen of Dr. Coues, in Chapter II, Volume V, of the Explorations and Surveys West of the One Hun- dreth Meridian: “Tn most portions of the United States the Red Bat is one of the most abundant, characteristic, and familiar species, being rivaled in these respects by the Little Brown Bat alone. It would be safe to say that in any given instance of a Bat entering our rooms in the evening, the chances are a hundred to one of its being either one or the other of these two species. The perfect noiselessness and swiftness of its flight, the ex- traordinary agility with which it evades obstacles, and the unwonted shape, associated in popular superstition with the demons of the shades, conspire to revulsive feelings that need little fancy to render weird and uncanny. But the Bat is no ghost; on the contrary, a substantial, compact little creature of flesh and blood, much like a Mouse with wings, completely animal to the tips of its ears and tail; an erratic, yet busy little hunter for insects out on the fly after bugs attracted to our apartments, not by the light as some suppose, but simply in pursuit of its prey, which is attracted by the light. When captured, which may not be until far on in a breathless attack with brooms, tongs, and hats, during which the farniture is upset and the lamp, perhaps, put out, the little animal will be found a reddish, furry, flat creature, with membranes of exquisite deli- cacy, folded on each side like half of a tiny umbrella, of which the tremendous long fingersare the stick ; humpy about the shoulders, sloping down to a furry expanse be- hind, with a piggish little head, twisting all ways at once, on a stumpy neck; mouse- like ears, standing straight up; funny, little, snapping, black specks of eyes; and an open countenance indeed—for the mouth is deep, bristliag with fine, needle-like teeth, while from the throat comes a sharp, squeaky barking of anger, and perhaps defiance, if we can suppose such a pigmy to have so great a soul. Such is the simple creature that excites emotioual persons to fancies not wholly lacking an element of terror; and the utmost damage it could do the clumsy giants, its captors, would be a prick from its tiny teeth—pretty sure to be given to an incautious finger tip. “An anecdote, illustrating a tender trait of this animal, has been related by Mr. Titian Peale. A person had caught and taken home a young Red Bat. ‘Three hours after- ward, in the evening, as he was conveying it to the museum, in his hand, while passing near the place where it was caught, the mother made her appearance and followed the boy for two squares, flying around him, and finally alighted on his breast, such was her anxiety to save her offspring. This faithful creature lived two days in the museum, and then died of injuries received from her captor. The young one, being but half grown, was still too young to take care of itself, and died shortly after’ ” 88 ATALAPHA (LASIURUS) CINEREVS (Beauv.) Coues. Hoary Bat. 1796. Vespertilio cinereus, Palisot de Beauvois, Cat. Peale’s Phila. Mus., 1796, 14.—LeConte, Proc. Phila. Acad., 1855, 483. 1823. Vespertilio pruinosus, Say, Long’s Expl. R. Mts., 1823, 67—Harlan, Fn. Am., 1825, 21; Med. and Phys. Res., 1831, 28.—Godman, Am. Nat. Hist., i, 1831, 68, pl. 2, f. 3—Rich., F. B. A., i, 1829, 1. —Coop., Ann. Lyc. N. Y., iv, 1837, 54—DeKay, N. Y. Fn., i, 1842, 7, pl. 2, f. 2. 1835. Nycticejus pruinosus, Temm., Mon. Mamm., 1835, 154.—Wagn., Suppl. Schreb., i, 1840, 544; v, 1855, 70. 1838. Scotophilus pruinosus, Gray., Mag. Zool. Bot., ii, 1828, 498. 1857. Lasiurus pruinosus, Tomes, P. Z. 8., 1857, 37. Lasiurus cinereus, H. Allen, Monog., 21; J. A. Allen, Bull. Mus Comp. Zodl., ii, 208. 1875. Atalapha (Lasiurus) cinereus, Coues, Report upon Geog. and Geolog. Expl. and Surveys West of 100th Merid., chap. ii, vol. v. 1875, 90.—Jordan, Man. Vert., 1878. Dentition as in A. noveboracensis. Size larger; length 4 to 5.50; tail 2 2.83 ; extent 10 to 15 inches, averaging 12 to 14; ear .33 to.50. Lips and ears marked with black ; body colors rich chocolate-brown, or smoky-fawn color, overlaid with white, giving a brilliant, hoary appearance. This is the only Bat known to inhabit the northern regions, as ob- served hy Kennicott. It is distributed over North America at large, but is most abundant in elevated regions and northern latitudes. Since 1823, it has generally been known by Say’s name, V. pruinosus. Major LeConte showed it to be identical with V. cinereus, Beauvois, and restored the prior name. Mr. F. W. Langdon informed me that a specimen of this Bat, in the collection of the Cincinnati Society of Natural History, was captured at Coal Springs, Kentucky, three or four miles from Cincinnati. Atalapha (Nycticejus) crepuscularis, (LeConte) Coues, may occur in southern Ohio, as it is reported from Pennsylvania to Missouri, and south-west. ORDER INSECTIVORA. Key TO FAMILIES OF INSECTIVORA. * Molar teeth multicuspid, with the cusps connected by deep re-entering ridges, which describe two elongated triangles, and with at least one extensive antero-internal ledge. Skuli with the calvarium wide; broadest about the periotic region, with the foramen magnum sub-circular or oblong; the occipital condyles variously di- vergent, with the par-occipital processes obsolete or wanting. Pelage very soft. (Soricoidea as opposed to Erinaceoidea.) 89 + Skull with the posterior ridges obsolete ; foramen magnum oblong, and inclined far forwards below; with no distinct post-glenoid process; with the tympanic element forming a bulla; intraorbital canal an extensive transverse aperture, arched over by a very narrow, osseous bar; zygomatic arch aslender rod; lower jaw with the ascending rami erect, and without cavities at the bottoms of the coronoid processes. molar teeth with the postero-internal ledge obsolete or wanting. Cervical vertebrae with no hypapophyses; dorsal and lumbar with no hyperapophyses. Sternum with manubrium broad and keeled. Anterior members developed more than the poste- rior; with carpus more or less enlarged, and at least with an os intermedium. Scapula long and narrow. . : . : . : : . . TALPIDA. tt Skull with the posterior ridges well developed; the foramen magnum sub-circu- lar, and inclined little forwards below; with a well developed post-glenoid process ; with the tympanic element ainular, not forming a bulla; infraorbital canal a rather long sub cylindrical tunnel, covered by a very broad, osseous wall; zygomatic arch not developed. Lower jaw with the ascending rami deflected outwards, and each with a cavity at the bottom of the coronoid process. Molar teeth with a postero- internal ledge armed with a cusp at its antero-internal angle. Vertebr charac- teristic ; cervical with weli developed hypapophyses; dorsal and lumbar with dis- tinct hyperapophyses. Sternum with the manubrium broad but ecarinate. Ante- rior members more slender than the posterior; with carpus normal, having no sickle- shaped bone or os intermedium; scapula short and broad. . F SoRICIDZE. FAMILY TALPID. In addition to the dental and skeletal characters already given in the Key to the Families of Insectivora the following external characters are added: Body stout, thick, and clumsy, without visible neck ; limbs very short; the anterior much broader and larger than the posterior ; provided with strong claws, adapted for digging. Scapula as long as the humerus and radius together. Eyes small; sometimes concealed by the integu- ment. No external ears; the meatus sometimes minute, and sometimes of ordinary size. Nostrils at end of snout, lateral or superior. Tail usually short; sometimes as long as the body. Fur usually soft, com- pact and velvety. A family of general distribution, except in tropical regions and in South America. Each region has its characteristic genera. Talpa is found in Europe and Asia; Scalops, Scapanus, Condylura, and Urotrichus, in America; the last named genus occurs, also, in Japan, and is the only insectiverous genus known to be common to both hemispheres. Talpa is not found in America, although Scapanus brewert has been mistaken for Talpa europea. Genus ScaLops Cuvier. Etymology: Skalops, mole, from Skallo, to dig. Scalops, Cuv., “Legons d’ Anat. Comp. i, 1800. This genus, as characterized by Cuvier, included Moles, with the nose 90 elongated, and not fringed; the nostrils superior or lateral; eyes hidden; tail short ; teeth 36 or 34; the two anterior upper on3s unusually large, and somewhat like those of a rodent. Pomel, in 1848, separated a genus, Scapanus, the claims of which to generic rank are now fully conceded, for the group with 44 teeth, retain- ing the name Scalops for the species with 36 teeth. In Scalops the two lateral incisors on each side above are small, thread-like, and often de- ciduous; in Scapanus all the teeth in both jaws in front of the last pre- molar, except the broad anterior upper incisors, are of nearly equal size, conical, the upper with the points rounded off, the lower more compressed and with the points more acute. In Scalops the tail is nearly naked; in Scapanus the tail is densely hairy. Prof. Baird, in 1857, admitted three species of Scalops; S. argentatus, Ohio, and west; S. aquaticus, the weli-known species of the eastern United States, and S. latimanus of Mexico. The latter is shown by H. Peters as equivalent to S. aquaticus, or to the western form, S. aquaticus, var.-argen- tatus (Aud. and Bach.), so Scalops stands represented by one species and a geographical race. In the genus Scapanus, Pomel, are two well-defined species; S. townsendt the Oregon Mole, and S. breweri, the Hairy-tailed Mole of Connecticut and New York to Cleveland, Ohio. Condylura cris- tata (L), the Star-Nosed Mole, and Urotrichus gibbst of-the Western Coast, complete the series of American Talpidx. ScaLops Aquaticvus Fischer. ComMMON EASTERN MOLE. 1758. Sorex aquaticus, Lin., Syst. Nat., 10th Ed., i, 1758, 53—Erxleben, Syst. Reg. Anim., 1771, 123—Schreber, Siiugt, iii, 566, table 108.—Boddaert, Elenchus Anim., 1784, 124—Gmelin, Syst. Nat., i, 1788, 112. 1771. Brown Mole, Penn., Syn. Quad., 1771, 314. 1777. Talpa flavescens, Erxleben, Syst. Reg. Anim., 1777, 118. (From Pennant.) 1800. Talpa purpurascens, Shaw, Gen. Zodl. Mamm., i, 1800, 521. 1820. Scalops canadensis, Desmarest, Mam., i, 1820, 155.—Harlan, Fauna Am., 1825, 32.—Woodruff, Am. Journal Sc., xxviii, 1835, 168. (Habits.) 1829. Scalops aquaticus, Fischer, Syn., 1829, 249,—Bachman, Bost. Jour. Nat. Hist., iv, 1843, 28 —Wagner, Suppl. Schreb., ii, 1841, 103.— Aud. and Bach., Quad. N. A., i, 1849, 81, pl. 31.—Jordan, Man. Vert., 2d Ed., 1878, 25. 91 1842. Scalops argentatus, var. argentatus, Aud. and Bach., Journal Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila., viii, 1842, 292; N. A. Quad., iii, 1653, 252, pl. el., f. 4—Waener, Suppl. Schreb., v, 1855, 573.—Kennicott, Pat. Of. Rep. Agric.. 1857, 97. (Description and habits.) Specific Characters Average length from nose to root of tail 44 inches; of tail to end of vertebra .95 inch; hand .85 inch; foot .75 inch; width of palm exceeds its length, and varies from .60 to .90 inch as the extremes. Eyes and ears excessively minute; the eyes not covered with integu- ment, a minute orbital opening being apparent. Muzzle long and de- pressed; snout truncate at an angle of about 45°; on this surface are the antero-superior nostrils; the flexible snout extends nearly three-eighths of an inch beyond the upper jaw. The tail is nearly naked. Color dark plumbeous, with occasionally a brownish tinge; feet, tail, nails, and snout are of a light flesh-color. The hind feet are rather slender and weak, but this is made up by the great size of the spade-like hands, nearly an inch in breadth, attached by short, strong arms to robust shoulders. Feet not under the body, but standing out at the sides edge- wise with the palm. In short, the whole form—the set of the limbs, great phoulders, short arms, broad hands and fossorial claws, united with the extraordinary muscular strength of the animal—adapt it to its method of ploughing through the soil, where it seems to travel as easily ason the surface. The earth seems scarcely less dense when one of these animated little ditchers is seen gliding along, not over, but literally through, the meadows, leaving his well-arched viaduct behind him, than does the water in the adjacent streams before the thrust of some sharp- nosed and large-finned darter or sun-fish. Variety argentatus.—T his form was established by Audubon and Bachman, “after some hesitation and doubt” (Quad. N. A., iii, p. 253), and admitted by Baird, who, however, questions “whether the two can, with entire pro- priety, be separated.” Dr. Coues, as already stated, regards it as no more than a geographical race of 8. aquaticus, and states that “none of the ascribed characters are diagnostic.” Among the assigned characters of this form are the greater size, slenderer head, more elevated nostrils, eyes entirely covered by the integument, proportionally larger ears, and especially the soft, dense, and glossy silvery grey fur, which reflects, in different lights, ‘tints of silver, purple, and bronze.”—Kennicott. Both forms are to be found in Ohio, as J am informed by Mr. Langdon. Prof. Baird gives the habital of argzntatus as from Detroit west. History and Habits —The most noticeable feature of this animal is its fore feet, short legs, and robust shoulders, adapting it to plough through the soil. 92 “In motion the fore feet are thrust forward at the sides, with the edges answering to the thumb of a man’s hand, placed downward, and the nails taking hold in the earth; the body is drawn along with ease and rapidity, as a row-boat is propelled by oars, the hind legs carry- ing the posterior parts. Those I have observed burrowing through un- broken soil appeared to loosen the earth in front with the long snout, and then to thrust it aside with the fore feet by the same movement which carried the body forward, the ground being raised above by the upward pressure of its powerful head and shoulders. The snout was kept in constant motion, undoubtedly as much in search of food as to loosen the particles of earth for the passage of the body.”—Kennicott. The mole constantly furrows the ground in search of insects which it usually finds within two or three inches of the surface. It rarely goes deeper, unless in winter or very dry weather, when the insects are deeper. It is not known that this mole departs from its insectivorous habits Kennicott observed that specimens kept in confinement ate sparingly of potatoes and lettuce, but died in three days, while others, kept in barrels of earth in which both vegetables and softened and dry corn were abund- ant, died- without eating them. It is not probable that this species does any injury to vegetation ; they rather protect it by destroying noxious insects, and much of the mis- chief attributed to them is done by the various Arvicole and Spermophiles. On certain English farms the Mole (Talpa europea) is regarded as a ben- efit, especially to grass lands and pastures. Our species is usually noc- turnal, sometimes found moving on cloudy days, and very early or very late on pleasant days. The nest is of soft grass or leaves, usually under a log or stump, nearly a foot, or even more, below the surface. From five to nine young have been observed; the gravid female has been observed in February ; young have been observed the last of May, and also in July. It is active in winter, and if the above statements are exact, there are probably two litters produced annually. Genus Scapanus’ Pomel. Scalops, Cuvier, Lecons d’ Anat. Comp., i, 1800. Scapanus, Pomel,* Archives Sc. Phys, et Nat., ix, 247, 1848.—Gill, Synop. Insect. Mamm.—Bull, U. 8. Geol. Surv., 2d Ser., No. 2, pp. 91- 120.—-Jordan, Manual Vertebrates, 1876, 25, First Edition. *Nora.—Ce troisiéme genre diftére des scalops par la position laterale et non supérieure de Vouverture des narines, et par la formule dentaire comprenant une intermédiaire supérieure et trois inferieures de plus. Les especes sont: Scapanus Townsendii et Bre- wert (Seal. Townsendit et Breweri, Bachm.)” Archives sc. Phys. et Nat., ix, 247, 1848, §3 Generic Characters.—Dental formula: i.32; 0. 4:5; pm. 44; m. $3 —24=— 44, Teeth of both jaws, anterior to last premolar (excepting the broad anterior upper incisors), are of nearly equal size, conical, the upper ones with the points rounded off; the lower more compressed, and with the points more acute. The premolars increase in diameter from first to third, though of equal length; the fourth is much large?, and triangular in section. Externally, there is a small acute lobe on the anterior edge of each premolar, and on all the molars close to the base of the crown; a similar lobe on the inner edge of the cortesponding tecth of lower jaw. The molars are in close contact ; the teeth of upper jaw anterior to molars are separated by diastemata. Lower incisors nearly equal; second not larger than the first. The nostrils are near the end of the muzzle, either lateral or superior. The tail is more or less hairy. ScaPANUS BREWERI (Bach.) Jordan. Hatry¥-TAILED MOLE. 1843. Scalops breweri, Bachman, Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., i, 1841, 41.— Tb., Bost. Journal Nat. Hist., iv., 1843, 32.—Wagner, Weigman’s Archiv., 1843, ii, 31.—Ib., Suppl. Schreb., v, 1855, 573.— Aud. & Bach., N. A. Quad., ii, 1851, 173, pl. i, xxiv. 1857. Scalops (Scapanus) breweri, Baird, Mamm., N. A., 1857, 68. 1876. Scapanus breweri, Jordan, Manual Vertebrates, 1876, 25; 2d Ed., 1878, 25. Specific Markings——A specimen in alcohol measured 1,65 inches from tip of nose to occiput, 4 inches t& root of tail; tail 1.05 inches; tail to end of hairs 1.25 inches; length of hand .72 inch; of foot .75; breadth of palm .55 inch. The body is rather more slender than Scalops aquaticus. The head ig rather pointed and elongated, owing to the great develop- ment of the muzzle, which projects about one-third of an inch beyond the incisors. The muzzle is depressed, tapering to a rounded truncate tip. There is a broad groove on the under side from the incisors to the bulb of the nose, which is terminal and smooth. The remainder of the muzzle is wrinkled and corrugated. Nostrils open on the sides of the terminal bulb; they are slightly visible from above, but not from be- neath. The eye is minute and covered with skin; it is a little back of the angle of the mouth, and midway between the tip of the snout and the occiput. There is no external ear; the auditory opening is an oval cavity about one-twelfth of an inch in diameter, situated just above the insertion of the arm. The tail is thick and blunt at the end, entirely and densely covered with rigid hairs about one-sixth of an inch long. The third finger is longest; the second about the same size, but not as 94 ‘ long; the fourth smaller and shorter; the first is larger than the fifth. The palms are about as broad as long, exclusive of the claws; these are long and fossorial, and much larger than those of the hind feet. The hind feet are narrower and weaker than the fore, although about the same length. The under surfaces of all the feet are perfectly smooth, the upper with scanty hairs; there is a ciliated border of short hairs about the posterior and lateral margin of the palm. The fur is long and full, the longest hairs on the back measuring .35 inch. Above the fur is a dark ashy, plumbeous from the roots, glossed with ashy brown; this ashy brown tinge is more decided beneath, and extends more towards the roots; towards the chin there is a slight tinge of reddish brown. The hairs on the sides and extremity of the tail are tipped with silvery. Prof. Baird mentions a specimen from Cleveland, presented by Prof. Kirtland, which had the tail almost entirely white, and the fur with whitish patches distributed irregularly over the body. Prof. Baird gives the distribution of this species as from Connecticut and New York to Cleveland, Ohio. Mr. F. W. Langdon has a specimen in his collection, taken by J. W. Shorten, at Rome, Adams county, Ohio, in May, 1877. FAMILY SORICIDA. In addition to the characters already given, based principally on the teeth and skeleton, the following more appreciable external characters are selected: The Shrews are Mouse-like Insectivora, distinguished by an elongated and pointed muzzle, extending some distance beyond the incisor teeth, and ending in a naked cartilaginous muffle, with the nostrils pierced in the sides. The eyes are minute, and usually hidden in the fur, but are apparent on close examination. External ears are developed, with two inner lobes protecting the meatus; one lobe is formed from the antit- ragus, the other by the helix. ‘The feet are five-toed, each toe with a distinct claw;.the fore feet are little, if at all, broader than the hind feet ; feet nearly plantigrade, and naked beneath. The external cars and smaller anterior feet readily separate the Shrews from the Moles. Besides the above, the stomach is simple; the cecum wanting; liver five-lobed, with a gall-bladder ; the right lung four, and the left one-lobed. There is a peculiar glandular organ near the fore legs, on each side, wanting or small in the female or young, and much developed in the male during the breeding season. “The peculiar odor, more or less musky, of Soricidz, is due to the secretion of these glands, and makes the Shrew-Mouse unacceptable as food to the cat that may have killed it.” (Owen.) The teeth vary from 28 to 32; there are two large incisor teeth in each 95 jaw, directed nearly horizontally forward; the upper much curved, and forming a hook; the lower straighter, and with the cutting edges lobed. They are an abundant and widely distributed family, remarkably vora- cious, feeding on worms, insects, and mollusks, sometimes destroying small vertebrates and readily devouring each other. They are chiefly nocturnal; some species of Neosorex are aquatic. The young, at birth, are naked and blind. None hibernate, but all are about in the coldest weather. The Shrews are represented in America by three genera; Sorex (L ), the most generalized type, also occurring in the Old World; Neosorex (Bd.) includes the Water Shrews, and is peculiar to North America, where it replaces Crossopus, of the Old World; Blarina, the most charac- teristic American genus, bas no exact Old World analogue. All are small and difficult to study. Measurements of such small ani- mals are often fallacious. Color variation , due to age, sex, season, or geographical distribution, have furnished data for worthless species; moreover, the tail and lips, and possibly the feet, undergo extraordinary changes at the rutting season, so that such terms as “ pachyurus,” “ longi- rostris,” ‘ platyrhynus,” are of doubtful implication. Perhaps no family of North American mammals, of equal abundance, is so little known. Their nocturnal and subterranean life, combined with a shy and wary disposition and diminutive size, often baffles the attempt of the natural- ist to study.their habits, or even to secure specimens of the known species. Contributions to our knowledge of American insectivora, since Profes- sor Baird’s treatise in 1857, are mainly due to Dr. Gill—Synopsis of Insectivorous Mammals,” < Bull. U.8. Geol. and Geog. Surv., 2d ser., No. 2, pp. 91-120, May 14, 1875; to Mr. J. A. Allen—* Catalogue of the Mammals of Massachusetts, with a Critical Review of the Species,” Bull. Mus. Comp. Zoél., Cambridge, i, No. 8, pp. 148~252, 1863; to Dr. Elliot Coues—“ Precursory Notes on American Insectivorous Mammals, with Descriptions of New Species,” in which several new sub-genera and species derived from Professor Baird’s MSS., written in 1861, are brought out, and other species described by Dr. Coues, based on material not at that time available. Genus Barina Gray. 1851. Blarina, Gray, Proc. Zoél. Soc. Lond., 1851. (Type Sorex talpoides, Gapper.) Generic Characters.—Teeth 82 or 80 (73 sub-genus Blarina, Gray, emend. ; 18 sub-genus Soriciscus, Coues). Ears small, the parts directed forward so 96 as to show no opening or appearance of a concavity of auricle. Tail short; scarcely or not as long as the head; haired, with a small terminal pencil. Fore feet broad, palms naked, claws enlarged. Body stout; the species ranging from the largest to the smallest of American Shrews. In the sub-genus Soriciscus occur most of the species, and among them the smallest Shrews in America. Sorex parva, Say, the type species, and Blarina exilipes, Baird, extend north to the Ohio, and possibly may occur in Ohio. BiaRins (BLARINA) BREVIcAUDA Baird. SHORT-TAILED SHREW: 1823. Sorex brevicauda, Say, Long’s Expd., i, 1823, 164.—Harlan, Faun. Amer., 1825, 29.—Bachman, J. A. N. Se. Ph., vii, 1837, 381._— Aud. & Bach., Quad. N. A., iii, 1854, 335. 1836. Sorex talpoides, Gapper, Zool. Jour., v, June, 1830, 208. 1837. Sorex dekayi, Bach., J. A. N. Sc. Ph,, viii, 1837, 377.—Aud. & Bach., Q.N. A., iii, 1853, 246 (original description). 1857. Blarina talpoides, Baird, Mam. N, A., 1857, 37. 1857. Blarina brevicauda, Baird, Mam. N, A., 1857, 42. 1877. Blarina (subg. Blarina) brevicauda, Coues, Precursory Notes on American Insectivorous Mammals.—Jordan, Manual of Vertes brates, 1876, p. 26, 2d ed., 1878, 352 (addenda). Description of Species.—Size large; 34 to 4 inches from nose to root of tail; tail 1 inch; tail to end of hair 14 inches; hind foot ~,; extent of snout beyond teeth 7. Form compact, with the head broad and massive. Tail short, about as long as the head, cylindrical, slightly depressed, naked at root, flesh-colored, thinly clothed with short, brownish-drab hairs, ter- minated by a pencil. Fur dense and soft, plumbeous at the base, tipped with glossy leaden-brown on the back, and lighter on the belly. Teeth tipped with brown, becoming glossy dark-brown at the points uf the in- cisors. The snout is flesh-color, the lobes brown. The minute black eye is visible in life, the opening through the skin being the size of a small pin-hole. The auricle is directed entirely forward, and fits exactly against the opening of the ear; on lifting it the other parts are seen well devel- oped. The hands are as wide or wider than the feet; palms and soles naked and sextuberculate. Geographical Distribution.—Range great—from eastern Nova Scotia to Lake Superior, and west to Nebraska; southward, through Pennsylvania, to Columbus, Georgia. South of Pennsylvania it is replaced by the smaller B. carolinensis, if, indeed, the two species are not identical, in which case its southern range is extended from South Carolina to Missouri. 97 Specimens 817-8 in the Smithsonian Institution were collected by Dr. Kirtland, at Cleveland, Ohio, and 2,140-3 by E. Newton, at Salem, Ohio. (Blarina talpoides, Baird, Mamm. N. A., 1857, 42.) History and Habits.—This is the largest, or one of the largest American Shrews; it is active and strong; the snout and head are powerful, and apparently much used in burrowing. It does not burrow under the ground continuously, as does the Mole, but passes along under the grass or leaves, seeking its food, occasionally inclining downwards under the soil, for a foot or more, and then coming to the surface. It does not dig out the earth, but presses it aside, descending beneath obstructions that come in its way, rather than going around them. This is the most abundant of our Shrews, abounding both in woods, meadows, and prairies. In some large areas it is impossible to find a foot-square not crossed by the net-work of well beaten, leaf-covered galleries made by this Shrew in its search for slugs, earth-worms, and the like. They are difficult to get, escapiag quickly when once unearthed. They are found at any season lying dead on the earth, left uneaten by birds or carnivorous beasts on account of the disagreeable odor emitted from the body glands. Its traces are not found in swamps or sloughs; it prefers high ground, and is in no sense aquatic. It it active in the coldest weather in winter, like others of the family in the north. From Mr. Kennicott’s interest- ing notes on the habits of this species in confinement, I quote the fol- lowing: “While alive, the minute black eye is distinctly seen, and always open; but, though the sense of sight may be possessed in the dark, it certainly is not used in the full light. Upon waving different objects before one, or thrusting my finger or a stick close to its face, no notice was taken of it whatever; but if I made any noise near by, it always started. If the floor were struck, or even the air disturbed, it would start back from that direction. I observed no indication that an acute sense of smell enabled it to recognize objects at any considerable distance, but its hearing was remarkable. An ex- ceedingly delicate sense of touch was exhibited by the whiskers, and if, after irritating a Shrew, I placed a stick against it in even the most gentle manner, the animal would instantly spring at it. I could see that in running along the floor it stopped the moment its whiskers touched anything; and, often when at full speed, it would turn aside just before reaching an object against which it seemed about to strike, and which it certainly had not seen. Unless enraged by being teased, it endeavored to smell every new object with which its whiskers came in contact, turning its long flexible snout with great fa- cility for this purpose. My caged specimens, both male and female, exhibited great pugnacity. When I touched, one several times with a stick, it would become much en- raged, snapping and crying out angrily. When attacked by a Meadow Mouse confined in a cage with it, one fought fiercely; and though it did not pursue its adversary when the latter moved off, neither did it ever retreat; but the instant the Mouse came close, it sprang at him, apparently not guided in the least by sight. It kept its nose and whiskers constantly moving from side to side, and often sprang forward with an angry ory, when the mouse was not near, as if deceived in thinking - had heard or felt a 98 movement in that direction. In fighting, it did not spring up high, nor attempt to leap upon its adversary, as the Mouse, but jerked itself along, stepping firmly, with the fore feet well forward and the head high. On coming in contact with the Mouse, it snapped at him, and, though it sometimes rose on its hind feet in the struggle, I did not observe that it used its fore feet as weapons of offense, like Arvicola. Its posture, when on guard, was always with the feet spread and firmly braced, and the head held with the snout pointing upward and the mouth and chin pointing forward, in which position its eyes would have been of no use could it have seen. The motions of the animal, when angry, are characterized by a peculiar firmness; the muscles appear to be held very rigid, while the movements are made by quick, energetic jerks. Short springs, either backward, forward, or sideways, appear to be made with equal readiness.” None of the specimens kept captive lived more than a day or two, al- though well cared for. They would not leave the sides of the wall or cage and cross the middle, but run around the sides; unless sharply chased, they would not jump over an ear of corn in the way, but ran around it. When hurt, this Shrew utters a short, tremulous note ; when much enraged, this note becomes longer, harsher, and twittering, like that of some sparrows. Occasionally, a short, clear cry is uttered, softer and lower, but not unlike that of the Common Mink. BiaRIna (Soriciscus) PARVA Say. Least SHREW. 1823. Sorex parvus, Say, Long’s Expedition, i, 1823, 164.—Harlan, Fauna Am., 1824, 29.—Bachman, J. A. N. Sc. Ph., vii, 1837, 394. 1887. Sorex cinerea, Bachman, J. A. N. Sc Ph, vii, 1837, 878; pl. xxiii, f. 3. 1878. Blarina (Soriciscus) parva, (Say) Jordan, Manual of the Vertebrates, 2d ed., 1878 (addenda, page 353). Specific Characters—Body rather stout; feet small; head two-thirds the length of the foot; foot little more than half the length of skull; tail thin, shorter than the head. Head and body about two and one-half inches long ; tail .75 inch; hind foot about .42. Color above, iron-gray, glossed with dark olive-brown ; beneath, light-ash, or brownish-gray ; tail bicolor, in harmony with the bodyareas. Dentition: 47}; pm. 3:3; m. $3—}$—80, Distribution.—Southern States; north to Pennsylvania; also, at Irving- ton, Indiana (Dr. D. 8. Jordan). Occurring at Carlisle, Pennsylvania, and in central Indiana, this species most probably is found in southern, or even central Ohio. I give it not as a known resident of Ohio, but as a species without reasonable doubt occurring there. The specimen in Dr. D. 8. Jordan’s collection, taken at Irving ton, Marion county, Indiana, is somewhat flattened by pressure, and has the back part of the skull crushed. The body is rather slender, 99 the muzzle elongated, the snout distinctly bilobed, and the nostrils lateral; the openings are nearly circular, and not visible from above. The whiskers are white; the longest are half an inch; there are about thirty on each side. The muzzle and chin are nowhere naked, but are covered with whitish, rather rigid hairs, less than one-sixteenth of an inch long. The ears are short, and concealed in the fur. The auricl3 covers the opening; on lifting it the edges of the antitragus and anti- helix are seen to be ciliated at the edges with appressed, white, short hairs; anterior face of ear naked, posterior covered with fur. The body- fur is rather loose and short; on the back the longest hairs measure a little more than two and one-half lines. The tail is one-half inch to end of hairs ; about five lines to end of vertebre; it is slender, nearly terete, well clothed with hairs, has no distinct pencil. ‘The tail is darker above than below; on the anterior side the hairs are granular from an ap- parently white substance resembling dried gum arabic, which is attached to the ends of many of the hairs; this is evidently an abnormal condi- tion of the specimen. The feet are rather broad and full; the hinder are once and a half the length of the front. The feet and hands are well covered above with white, shining, appressed hairs; both are naked be- low; all the toes and fingers have well developed claws, at the bases of which are red spots, formed, evidently, by the accumulation of blood af- ter death. The three middle fingers are longest, and nearly equal; the same is true of the toes. The first finger is larger than the very small thumb; the end of its claw extends to penultimate joint of second finger. The feet have six tubercles; on the hands I can discern but five. The fur is lead color at base, then light iron-gray, and tipped with olive- brown; the under parts are of a lighter tint of brownish-gray or light-ash ; the feet and hands are white, and the tail indistinctly bicolor. Length of head and body 2} inches, hind feet .40 inch, tail a little less than 4 inch. The teeth have black tips; the upper anterior incisor is hooked ; it has a second hook on the cutting edge, a little in front of the base, its point even with the succeeding teeth. The large upper and long front in- cisors approach each other at an angle to near the tips, but do not touch; they have no internal lobe. The first and second premolars are about equal; the third is about half the length and size of the two anterior. There is a slight diastema between the third lateral tooth and the first molar. The last molar is scarcely visible from the outside. The lower anterior incisors have each two slight crenulations; they are stout, curved for the anterior third; the front two-fifths are jet-black, and are united to the ivory-white posterior portion by a reddish-brown band; their bases extend back under the bases of the first two lateral teeth. 100 The small reddish-black tipped cusp, plainly seen on the inside of each molar, is very small on the first three lateral teeth. As the specimen becomes thoroughly dry, the line of demarcation between the lower and upper fur of the animal is plainly visible. ORDER RODENTIA. Incisors 3; (exceptionally 3, there being two supplemental posterior teeth); teeth encased in enamel, and continually reproduced from per- sistent pulps, and growing in a circular direction ; canines none; molars attypically with ridged surfaces. Lower jaw with condyles in longitu- dinal furrows. Members and feet adapted for walking. Placenta dis- coidal deciduate. Kry To FaMIties OF RODENTIA. * Incisors 3; tail well developed. t Hair forming a fur without spines. a. Tail broad, fiat and scaly; feet webbed; molars #4; body stout and heavy. ‘ 5 a : ij . 3 : : CasTORIDA. aa. Tail and hind legs excessively elongated; the latter adapted for leap- ing; molars $24. be Re Re HE, EE) By Gh ZAaPODIDE, aaa. Tail usually long and hairy; molars 23, or 474. F ScIURIDZ. + Fur with stiff spine-like bristles; toes with long curved claws. SPALACOPODIDZ. * * Incisors 3 ; the middle upper incisors large, grooved, the outer ones small; teeth 28; tail very short; ears long. ; . é “ ‘ 3 ‘ zi LEPORIDZ. FAMILY SCIURIDA. Family Characters —Dental formula: i. }-}; pm. 32 or Ek}; m. 338 = or }%. Upper front premolar often deciduous; the last four grinding teeth of nearly equal size. Post-orbital process well developed, either short, pointed, and triangular, or long, slender, and much decurved. Palate broad and flat, extending back of last molar. Feet scansorial or fossorial, body generally elongate, tail always well haired. The variations in color, size, and general form, are very great, and the number of well-defined species is very much less than was once supposed. Species of the family are found in all continental lands except Aus- tralia; they are most numerous in the Northern Hemisphere. Of the eight genera admitted by Mr. J. A. Allen, Sciurus is nearly cos- mopolitan, Cynomys is restricted to the parks and plains of the Rocky Mountain plateau, Pteromys to the tropical portions of Asia, and Xerus to Africa. Arctomys, Tamias, Spermephilus and Sciuropterus are found through- out the temperate and cold-temperate regions of the Northern Hemis- phere. Representatives of five genera are found in Ohio, as is shown in the accompanying key. 101 The Squirrels as a group are arboreal; they nest in trees, eat the fruits and buds of trees, and rarely go to the ground except for food. They have a light and graceful but muscular form; their nails are strong and sharp; they climb and leap with the greatest ease, aided by their large and bushy tails, which support and steer them while in the air. The fore feet are prehensile, the Squirrel seizing and holding its food with its hands, standing on the hind feet while eating. Except the Flying Squirrels, they are diurnal, keeping in the trees at night, and usually for a few hours in the middle of the day. The fur is nearly valueless; the flesh properly cooked is excellent food. As a group they are timid, readily domesticated, active in confinement, becoming agreeable and in- telligent pets. Their main food is nuts, although they take insects at times, and are often so fond of the cereal grains as to be a nuisance to farmers. Indeed in 1749 Pennsylvania paid $40,000 from the public treasury in premiums for the destruction of Squirrels. From the nature of their retreats, and natural activity, they evade the attacks of rapacious animals. Preying birds, reptiles, Wild Cats, and Martens at times cap- ture the young, ana rarely the old. Man is their worst enemy, although some species are most abundant in the nioneer settlements. Key TO THE GENT A OF SCLURIDA. * A densely furred membrane along tr« sides between anterior and posterior limbs; tail depressed, flattened, densely ‘urred; perman@nt molars 5-5 above. : SCIUROPTERU » * Sides without membrane specially modified. + No cheek pouches; tail bushy, at least as long as body; ears long; no black stripes along the back.. . J a - ‘* ‘ ‘ . Scrurvs. + t Cheek peuches present. t Back with three to five distinct black stripes; tail shorter than body, not bushy ; cheek pouches well developed. P : . . Tamias, +t Not as above; body rather slender, squirrel like; cheek pouches well de- veloped; claw of thumb rudimentary or wanting. SPERMOPHILUS, t t t Body large, thick-set, depressed ; cheek pouches shallow; thumb rudimen- tary, armed with a small flat nail, not a claw; soles naked. : ARCTOMYS. Genus ScruRoPreRvs. F. Cuvier. Etymology: Greek, Skiouros, a Squirrel; Pteron, a wing. Sciurus, Linn., (in part) and of early authors generally. Pteromys, G. Cuvier (in part), and most recent authors. Sciuropterus, F. Cuvier, Ann. du Mus., x, 1825, 126, pl. x. (Type, Sci- urus volans, Linn.) Generic Characters—Skull short, broad, highly arched, in general form, a miniature of Sciurus hudsonius, but the supra-orbital notch deeper, 102 and inter-orbital region more constricted, the orbital fosse, auditory bulle, and ears longer. Premolars, two; the first minute. Limbs united by a furred membrane, which is an expansion of the skin of the sides of the body, supported in front by a slender bone articulating with the carpus, and directed backwards. Tail two thirds as long as head and body, broad and flat, longer hairs directed laterally, thus serving as a rudder in their flight-like leaps, and with the special membrane support- ing the body in air in their short flights from tre to tree. Sciuropterus may be regarded as a modified form of Sciurus, possessing rudimentary powers of flight, through the support of the parachute-like expansion of the skin of the sides of the body and the broad, flat tail. Pelage dense, soft, and furry; ears large, in conformity with their nocturnal habits. Colors, some soft, dull shade of brown above, and whitish beneath. Animals of small size, and crepuscular or nocturnal habits. This genus is represented in North America by asingle species of wide distribution; Sciwropterus volans takes its place in Europe ; several species occur in Asia. ScIUROPTERUS VOLUCELLA (Pall.) Geoff. Var. volucella Allen. SOUTHERN FLYING SQUIRREL. 1743. Sciurus volans, Catesby, Carolina, ii, 1748, 76, 77, pl. lxxvi, lxxvii.— ‘Brisson, Quad., 157.—Linn., Syst. Nat., i, 1766, 88 (in part). 1788. Scvwrus volucella, Pallas, Nov. Spec. Glires, 1788, 351, 353.—Gmelin, Syst. Nat., i, 1788, 153;—Schreber, Siugt., iv, 1792, 808, pl. ccxxii.—Shaw, Gen. Zodl., ii, 1801, 155, pl. civ. 1818. Pteromys volucellu, Desm., Nouv. Dict. Hist. Nat., xxvii, 1818, 406; Mamm,., ii, 1822, 343.--Harlan, Faun. Amer., 1825, 187.—Griff, Cuv., v, 1827, 259.—Fischer, Syn. Mamm., 1829, 365.—Godman, Amer. Nat. Hist., ii, 146—Yarrell, Proc. Zoél. Soc. Lond., 1830-1, 38 (anatomy).—“D. W. C.,” Loud. Mag. Nat. Hist., ix, 1836, 569 (habits)—Emmons, Quad. Mass., 1840, 69.—Thomp., Hist. Vermont, 1842, 47.—DeKay, Zodl. N. York, i, 1842, 65, pl. xvi, fig. 2—Wagner, Suppl. Schreb., iii, 1848, 231—Schinz, Syn. Mamm., ii, 1845, 54.—Aud. & Bach., Quad. N. A., i, 1849, 216, 69, pl. xxviii—Kenn., Pat. Off Report Agric., 1856-57, 69, pl. viii—Baird, Mamm. N. A, 1857, 286—Thomas, Trans. IIL. Agric. Soc., iv, 1860, 657.—Hall, Canadian Nat. and Geol., 1861, 292 —Cooper, Proc. Cal. Acad., ii, 1861.—Tomes, Proc. Zodl. Soc. Lond., 1861, 281 (Guatemala).—Maximilian, Wieg. Arch. f. Na- turgesch., 1861, 77.—- Allen, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zodl., i, 1869, 224.— Gilpin, Proc. and Trans. Nova Scotia Inst. Nat. Sci., ii, pl. ii , 103 1870, 12.—Adams, Field and Forest Rambles, 1873, 99, 296 (New Brunswick).—Perkins, Amer. Nat., vii, 1874, 182 (habits in con- finement). 1828. Sciurvpterus volucella, Geoffroy, Dict. Class. Hist. Nat., xiv, 1828, 132.—Jordon, Man. Vert., 1878. 1874. Sciwropterus volucella, var. volucella, Allen, Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist , ‘xvi, 1874, 189; Bull. Essex Inst., vi, 1874, 66; Mon. N. A. Ro- dentia, 1877, 655. Specific Characters.—Size varying with locality; head and body ranging in adults from 7.50 to 4.75 inches; tail vertebre from 5.00 to 3.50; tail, with hairs, from 6.50 to 4.25, and even less. Yellowish-brown to pale reddish-brown above, white to creamy white below, with sometimes pale rufous; tail above usually darker than back— decidedly blackish in some northern forms. History and Varieties of Species—The Flying Squirrels were separated from ordinary Squirrels in 1800, by G. Cuvier, under the generic name Pieromys. In 1825, F. Cuvier separated the small Flying Squirrels of Europe and North America from the others, under the name Sciuropterus, calling attention to the cranial and dental differences, as well as to the evident difference in size and shape of tail. The wide geographical variation in size has led to the recognition of several species in North America. Prof. Baird, in 1858, with few speci- mens at hand, hesitatingly admitted four species—volucella, hudsonius, alpinus, and oregonensis. Mr. J. A. Allen, in Monographs of North American Rodentia, recog- nizes one species with two varieties. The synonymy of var. volucella is given above. Sciuropterus volucella, var. hudsonius, Allen, Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., xvi, 1874, 289, is the northern form known as Sciurus hudsonius, Gmelin, 1788; Pteromys hudsonius, Fischer, 1825; Sccurus sabrinus, Shaw, 1801; Pteromys sabrinus, Rich., 1828; Pteromys alpinus, Wagner, 1843; Greater Flying Squirrel of Forster, 1772, etc. The northern form is large, with the tail dusky to dark, and the gen- eral color of the body above less yellowish ; it grades insensibly into the Southern Flying Squirrel. “There is,” says Mr. Allen, ‘no break in the sequence from north southward, either in size, color, or other characters, by which the group can be subdivided either specifically or varietally.” The recognition of a northern and southern sub-species is almost entirely arbitrary. The alteration in average size with the latitude already referred to in the case of the Virginia Deer, nearly all species of extensive north 104 and south range becoming smaller to the southward, prevails decidedly in the Sciuride, and the Flying Squirrel is no exception. Description and Habits.—The following description and measurements are from Robert Kennicott’s Report on the Quadrupeds of Illinois, in the Report of the Commissioner of Patents, 1856: ‘Length of old male in March, from nose to root of tail, 44 inches; vertebre of tail, 3 inches; tail to end of hair, 374 inches; breadth of tail in natural position, 14 inches ; width across back, including fur and flying membrane, 4 inches; length of supplemental bone supporting membrane, ~ inch, “This is certainly the most beautiful of our roients In the specimen before me, the long and exquisitely soft fur is slate colored, tipped with creamy-yellowish drab on the back ; the top of the tail brownish drab; on the under surface milk-white, tipped with cream color at the outer edges of the membrane and toward the tail, the under surface of which is very light brownish-yellow, tinged with cream. ‘The large, prominent eyes are black and lustrous; the whiskers long, and the nearly naked ears rather large. ‘The tail is densely clothed with soft hairs, and smoothly flat- tened; the feet are slender, with small, arched nails. The skin on the side is extended outward to form a membrane, which is attached to the legs, and to a supplemental slen- der curved bone, articulating with the joint of the foot. When this membrane is stretched, the animal is enabled to sail throngh the air to some distance by the force gained in descending from any elevated position, being aided in this by the flattened tail, which also serves as arudder. It is not to be supposed, however, that the flying squirrel can propel itself through the air like a bird or bat. The tail and membranes only form a sort of parachute to buoy it up, while the force gained by the descent, and by the spring made, carry itforward. When it is about to light it sails upward by using the tail and hinder parts as a rudder, the momentum acquired being sufficient to raise it for some height at a considerable curve.” The habitat of the Flying Squirrel ts strictly among the trees; it does not move about by day, except in cloudy weather. I have seen them in the late evening sailing from the top of one tree trunk to the base of another, but never on the ground. It is gregarious, assembling in hol- low trees, from which as many as a dozen will dart when the sides of their retreat is thoroughly thumped. Its food is similar to that of other squirrels. A pair, kept in confinement under the observation of the author, made their nest in a crayon-box placed over a bay window. In the evening they would come to the floor and take up any kind of nuts, ends of ears of pop-corn, and similar food, which was packed away in the box in excess of their daily meals. Their favorite amusement was to jump from the highest point of the transoms directly toward occupants of the sitting room, suddenly veering to the right or left when almost in one’s face, and alighting on the floor or furniture at the opposite side of the room. The female joined with the male in these amusements until in April when, heavy with young, she became sluggish. The young, four in number, were brought forth in the drawer of the library table, at 105 which some of the family sat every evening. The mother was very much annoyed, and even alarmed when the drawer was closed during her temporary absence. The male was not admitted to the drawer, but kept to the box. Finally, the whole family escaped from an open window and took to the woods, or fell a prey to their natural enemies; although Kennicott relates that the species has been known to take up its resi- dence, voluntarily, in and about human dwellings. Be that as it may, we never saw our gentle and beautiful pets again. Genus Scrurvus Linnzus. Etymology: Skiouros, a squirrel (Ski—shade ; owra—tail.) Sciurus, Linnzeus, Syst. Nat., 10th ed., 1758, and authors. Macroxus, F. Cuvier, Dict. Sci. Nat., x, 1818. Rhinoscivurus, Gray, Cat. Mamm. Brit. Mus., 1848, 195. Rheithrosciurus, Gray, Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist., 3d ser., xx, 1867, 272. Maercaus, Gray, Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist., 3d ser. xx, 1867, 275. (Not Macroxus, F. Cuvier.) Generic Characters—Skul short, very broad between the orbits; cranial portion greatly expanded; post-orbital processes long, slender, decurved ; malar-bone slender; ante-orbital foramen a narrow, vertical slit, opening far in advnce of first pre-molar; upper grinding teeth four or five; first pre-molar, when two are present, very small; muzzle short; ears well developed, well clothed, sometimes tufted; tail generally as long or longer than the body, broad, with the long hairs drooping laterally ; nail of pol- lex rudimeutary; pelage full and soft, but sometimes more or less rigid; coloration variable, but never with well-defined stripes on the dorsum ; size generally large; no cheek pouches or lateral membrane. The group above characterized are so homogeneous as not to be readily separated. Some thirty or more nominal species are described, which Mr. Allen re- duces to one-third that number. The genus reaches its fullest develop- ment in Southern Mexico and Central America, the metropolis of the group, where several species occur. The most obviously variable charac- ter is the tail, which varies greatly in length, fullness, and breadth. Scrurus HuDsonius Pallas. Var. hudsonius Allen, EasSTERN RED SQUIRREL; PINE SQUIRREL; CHICKAREE. 1772. Sciwrus vulgaris, Forster, Phil. Trans., lxii, 1772, 378. 1777. Sciurus vulgaris, e, hudsonicus, Erxleben, Syst. Anim., 1777, 416. 1778. Sciurus hudsonius, Pallas, Nov. Spec. Glir., 1778, 376.—Gmelin, Syst. Nat. i, 1788, 147.—Schreb., Saéugt., iv, 1792, 777, pl. cexiv.— 1815. 1822. 1827. 1843. 1874. 106 Shaw, Gen. Zoél., ii, 1801, 140.—Kuhl, Beitrage zur Zodl., 1820, 66.—Desm., Mamm., ii, 1822, 340.—Sabine, Franklin’s Narr., 1823, 663.—Harlan, Faun. Amer., 1825, 185.—Godman, Am. Nat. Hist., ii, 1826, 188.—Rich., Fauna Boreali-Amer., i, 1829, 187, pl. xvii.—Fischer, Synop. Mam., 1829, 349.—Gapper, Zool. Jour., v, 1830, 205.—‘‘ F, Cuvier, Suppl. Buff. Hist. Nat., i, Mam., 18381, 303.”—Bachman, Proc. Zodl. Soc. Lond., vi, 1838, 100; Charles- worth’s Mag. N. H., iii, 1839, 383.—Thompson, Nat. Hist. Ver- mont, 1842, 46; App., 1853, 14 (albino)—DeKay, New York Zool., i, 1842, 61, pl. xvii, fig. 2—Wagn., Suppl. Schreber’s Sdugt., iii, 1848, 178 —Schinz, Synop. Mam., ii, 1845, 12.—Aud. & Bach., Quad. N. Am., i, 1849, 125, pl. xiv— Woodhouse, Sit- greave’s Expl. Colorado and Zufii Rivers, 1853, 53 (Indian Ter- ritory).—Kennicott, Pat. Off Rep., Agr., 1856 (1857), 67, pl. vii. —Bd., Mam. N. Am., 1857, 260, pl. xlvi, fig. 1—Thomas, Trans. Tll. State Agric. Soc., iv, 1860, 656.—Hall, Canad. Nat. and Geol., 1861, 290.—Maximilian, Wiegm. Arch. f. Naturg., 1861, 73.— Ross, New Edinb. Phil. Journ., xiii, 1861, 162; Nat. Hist. Rev., 1862, 274 (to Arctic Circle).—Gray, Ann. and Mag. Nat. Hist., 3d ser., xx, 1867, 418.—Allen, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zodl., i, 1869, 223; Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., 3d ser., xx, 1867, 418.—Allen, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zoél., i, 1859, 223; Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., xiii, 1870, 188; ib., xvii, 1874, 48; Bull. Essex Inst., vi, 1874, 57.—Gilpin, Proc. and Trans. Nov. Scot. Inst. Nat. Sci., pt. iii, 1870, 12.—Stevenson, Hayden’s Rep. U.S. Geol. Surv. Wyom., 1871, 461.—Adams, Field and Forest Rambles, 1878, 78, 295.— Merriam, U. 8. Geolog. Surv. Terr., 6th Ann. Rep., 1872, 663.— Grinnell, Ludlow’s Black Hills of Dakota, 1874, 81.—Jordan, Man. Vert., 1878, 28. Sciurus carolinus, Ord, “Guthrie’s Geog.” (2d. Am. ed.), ii, 1815, 292. Sciurus rubrolineatus, Desmarest, Mam., ii, 1822, 333. Tamia hudsonia, Lesson, Man. Mamm., 1827, 231. Tamias rubrolineatus, Schinz, Syn. Mam., ii, 1843, 48. Sciurus hudsonius var. hudsonius, Allen, Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., xvi, 1874, 288; Mon. N. A. Rodentia, 1877, 672. Varieties and Distribution—Of the present species, four geographical varieties are recognized, namely: hudsonius, richardson, douglassi, and fremontt. These are sufficiently distinct in their extreme phases, but are very much blended wherever their respective habitats weet; the sub- species are readily separated by their coloration, especially the tail markings. 107 8. hudsonius, including its varieties, is found over most of North Amer- ica, extending north to the limit of forest vegetation, and south over the northern two-thirds of the United States. Our variety has a more extensive range than all the others; its habitat embraces nearly all of North America north of about latitude 34° east of. the Rocky Mountains, and extending northward over most of Alaska. Its southern limit in the States is irregular, terminating on the Atlantic coast near Delaware Buy, but occupying the highlands of the interior as far southward as northern Georgia and Alabama, and even Monticello, Mississippi. It is not common south of central Illinois and northern Missouri, although Woodhouse notes its occurrence in the Indian Ter- ritory. Description of var. hudsonius.— Average length, from nose to base of tail, six and three-fourths inches; tail to end of vertebre, four and one-half inches, to end of hairs six inches. Above, pale, grayish, fulvous, each hair once or twice ringed with black; below, pure white, or white with faint annulations of black; generally a rather broad dorsal stripe of yel- lowish red ; in many specimens, a short, conspicuous black lateral line. Ears blackish toward and at the end, with, in winter, a short, bushy pencil or tuft. Middle of tail dorsally of the same color as the middle of the back ; the central reddish portion bounded with black, the latter be- ing fringed with pale yellow. Upper surface of feet more or less tawny, often bright golden. The soles of the feet are naked in summer; in win- ter thickly furred, except the tubercles at base of toes. Winter speci- mens are, as a rule, redder than summer ones, with the genéral pelage much fuller, longer, and softer than in summer. Northern specimens are generally longer than southern ones, as usual in species with wide latitude. The brightest or reddest specimens, with whitest under parts, are from New York, Pennsylvania, and Ohio. Habitat and Habits—The natural home of -this beautiful and active little Squirrel is in heavy timber, on dry, elevated land. It is also very abundant in northern Ohio and Indiana; it may occur sparingly in the southern parts of these States. Mr. Langdon states that it is common at St. Mary’s, but is not identified in the vicinity of Cincinnati. It is often found among evergreens, particularly the black spruce, the cones of which form its favorite food. | Mr. Kennicott gives, in Patent Office Report for 1866, interesting notes on its habits, from which the following is abridged: ‘Unlike most Squirrels, this species sometimes, but not often, lives in holes in the ground. Unlike others, too, it collects into its hole, in autumn, ample provision of the good things of squirrel life, wherewith to console and sustain itself in the uncomfortable 108 season of frost and snow. It makes large hoards of nuts, acorns, and seeds; and, in consequence of this good cheer, this Squirrel is seen actively scampering about in cold weather, when his hungry cousins cannot pluck up courage to leave their warm abodes even in search of food. This Squirrel runs with great swiftness, and, though it cannot leap as far as the migratory species, it darts along the trunk of a tree much more rap- idly. Its note is a merry, shrill chir-r-r-r-r, very unlike the migratory and Fox Squirrels. Like the Red Fox and some other animals, the Chickaree appears in some instances to follow the settlements of the white man. Dr. Kirtland speaks of its having made its appearance, about the beginning of the present century, on the Western Reserve, where it is now, 1856, exceedingly abundant. It may be that this appearance of the Red Squirre] is the result of the destruction of certain enemies.” It is stated, in the Geological Survey of Ohio for 1888, that this species “destroys the Black and Gray species, and also the young of birds. I have myself seen it committing its depredations on a brood of young Robins.” ScIURUS CAROLINENSIS Gmelin. Var. leucotis Allen. NORTHERN GRAY SQUIRREL. 1792. Sciurus cinereus, Schreber, Siiugt., iv, 1792, 766, pl. ccxii (nec S. cinereus, Linn., 1758).—Harlan, Faun. Amer., 1825, 173.—H. Smith, Griffith’s Cuvier, v, 1827, 254—Fischer, Synop. Mam., 1829, 852.—Thompson, Hist. Vermont, 1842, 45.—Maximilian, Weigm. Arch. f. Naturg., 1861, 66. 1815. Sctwrus pennsylvanicus, Ord, “ Guthrie’s Geog. (2d Am. ed.) ii, 1815, 292” (dusky phase). 1826. Sciwrus niger, Godman, Amer. Nat. Hist., ii, 1826, 183 (melanistic phage) (nec S. niger, Linn., 1858).—Richardson, Faun. Bor. Amer., i, 1829, 191.—Gapper, Zodl. Journ., v, 18380, 206.— Bach., Prec. Zodl. Soc. Lond., 1838, 96; Charlesworth’s Mag Nat. Hist., ili, 1839, 83835; Amer. Journ. Sci. and Arts., xxxvii, 1839, 307.—Emmons, Quad. Mass., 1840, 67—DKay, N.Y. Zodl., i, 1842, 60, pl. xvii, fig. 1—Thompson, Hist. Vermont, 1842, 45.—Wagner, Suppl. Schreber’s Siugt., iii, 1848, 172.—Schinz, Synop. Mam., ii, 1845, 9.— Aud. & Bach., Quad. N. A., i, 1849, 261, pl. xxxiv.—Maximilian, Weigm. Arch. f. Naturgesch, 1861, 76.—Hall, Canad. Nat. and Geol., 1861, 301. 1826. Sciurus carolinensis, Godman, Amer. Nat. Hist., ii, 1826, 1381.— Doughty’s Cab. Nat. Hist., ii, 1832, 240, pl. xxi—Baird, Mam. N. Amer., 1857, 256, pl. xlv, fig. 2 (skull) (in part; “larger northern, and black and dusky” varieties only).—Thomas, Tr. Ill. Agr. Soc., iv, 1860, 656.—Hall, Canad. Nat. and Geol., 1861, 301.—Hayden, Trans. Am. Phil. Soc., Phila., xii, 1863, 144— Allen, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zodl., i, 1869, 222 (Massachusetts); Proc. 109 Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., xiii, 1870, 188 (lowa).—Gray, Ann. and Mag. Nat. Hist., 3d ser., xx, 1867, 426 (vars. “major” et “niger”). 1830. Sciurus leucotis, Gapper, Zodl. Journ., v, 1830, 206, pl. xi (based on Canada specimens).—Bachman, Proc. Zoél. Soc. Lond., 1838, 96; Charlesworth’s Mag. Nat. Hist., iii, 1839, 385; Amer. Journ. Sci. and Arts, xxxvii, 1839, 298.—Emmons, Quad. Mass., 1840, 66.—DeKay, New York Zodl., i, 1842, 57, pl. xviii, fig. 1— ’ Wagner, Suppl. Schreber’s Saugt., iii, 1848, 160—Schinz, Synop. Mam., ii, 1845, 8. 1842. Sciurus vulpinus, DeKay, N. Y. Zodl., 1842, 59 (winter pelage). 1849. Sciurus migratorius, Aud. & Bach., Quad. N. Amer., i, 1849, 265, pl. xxxv.—Kennicott, U.S. Patent Office Rep., Agr., for 1856-57, 62, pl. vi—Adams, Field and Forest Rambles, 1873, 296 (west- ern and south-western parts of New Brunswick). 1874. Sciwrus carolinensis var. leucotis, Allen, Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., xvii, 1874, 287; Mon. N. A. Rodentia, 1877, 700. Description.—The Northern Gray Squirrel, varies in length of body, from nine to eleven and one-half inches, average length ten and one-half inches; tail vertebre, eight inches, varying from seven to nine; tail to end of hairs: eleven and one-half, varying from ten to twelve and one-half inches. It is whitish-gray above, with a dorsal area and lateral line brownish-yellow, with a more or less fulvous suffusion beneath the sur- face of the pelage, which shows somewhat through the surface tints; beneath, white. Varies through dusky and annulated phases to intense glossy-black. Tail with the hairs yellowish-brown basally, with narrow, black annulations, and a broad, conspicuous sub-terminal black bar, the hairs all broadly tipped with white, giving a white surface tint, through which the colors above mentioned may be seen. Hars not tufted, with or without a conspicuous woolly tuft of white at the base posteriorly. The above characters separate var. leucotis from carolinensis, the Southern Gray Squirrel, which is smaller and has the general color of dorsal sur- face yellowish-brown, instead of whitish-gray. The general colors above, give, in var. leucotis, a whitish-gray tint, especially marked northward and in winter specimens; while the general color above, of var. carolinensis, is mixed yellowish-brown and black. Tue dusky phases of carolinensis are local in their occurrence, often wholly unknown over wide areas; they occur more frequently near the Great Lakes than further southward. Where the pure black phase oc- curs, usually every intermediate stage may be found, from the ordinary type to the glossy-black. 110 Distribution —The present species ranges eastward along the Atlantic coast to New Brunswick, thence westward over the southern half ot Maine, most of the St. Lawrence Valley, southern portions of Canada, Michigan, Wisconsin, Iowa, and up the Missouri at least to the mouth of the Platte, and south to the Gulf. It ranges west to the eastern border of the plains, from Nebraska to Texas, and apparently far into Mexico. Its northern limit coincides nearly with that of the Alleghanian fauna, that is to the isotherm of 44° F. Var. leucotis ranges southward over both the Alleghanian and Carolinian fauna, or about to the isotherm of 56° F., where the two sub-species blend, carolinensis extending the range of the species southward to the Gulf coast, into Mexico, and perhaps even to Guatemala. Besides the above, Mr. Allen recognizes a third variety, which may prove a distinct species. Var. yucatanensis is founded on four specimens from Merida, Yucatan; more specimens are requisite to fix its relations to the series. Habits—This is the most abundant of American squirrels; it has a wide range, is extremely prolific, and in certain localities exists in almost incredible abundance. Dr. Hoy, of Racine, Wisconsin, relates that he has known a hunter in northern Ohio to kill 160 ina day. The species apparently increases in numbers in certain districts after their settlement. Kennicott speaks of the prevalent report that persons have been compelled to watch the fields during their migrations, probably, to prevent destruction of the crops. Dr. 8. P. Hildreth, in the “Pioneer His- tory of the Ohio Valley,” 1848, quotes from manuscript of Col. James Barker, of the gray squirrel ‘‘coming in millions from the north to the south, destroying whole fields of corn in a few days.” Mr. Frank W. Langdon, Madisonville, Ohio, to whom the writer is principally indebted for notes on Ohio mammals, drawn from the early history of the Ohio country, writes that the gray squirrel is common a hundred miles north of Cincinnati, but is rather vaguely reported in that locality. The remarkable migrations performed at times by this species consti- tute a most interesting feature in their history. They congregate in the autumn in immense numbers, and move off in the same general direc- tion, not turning aside for the largest streams, though usually averse to water. Dr. John A. Kennicott relates that during one of these migra- tions innumerable squirrels swam across the Niagara near Buftalo, New York, landing so exhausted as to be easily taken by hand or knocked down with sticks. Mr. Kennicott has the following notes in regard to these migrations : lil “The reason for these migrations is not satisfactorily explained. That they are caused by want of food is hardly probable, as the squirrels are found to be fat at the time, and as often leave localities abounding with food as otherwise, After one of these grand migrations, very few of the species are found in the localities from which they have moved, and these, as if alarfned at the unusual solitude, are silent andshy. They rapidly increase in numbers, however, and in a few years are as abun- dant as before. I am not aware that they ever migrate except when exceedingly abundant. Of these immense hordes but few probably sur- vive. Nosudden increase in their numbers was heard of in southern Wisconsin after the several migrations from northern Illinois. Many are drowned in attempting to cross streams; not a few are destroyed by man; some die from utter exhaustion, and when forced to travel in an unnatural manner, upon the ground, they fall an easy prey to rapacious birds and mammals, all of which feast when the squirrels migrate.” I learn from Dr. Hoy that one of tnese migrations is said to have taken place in 1842; he witnessed another in 1847, and a third in 1852. From these facts, and from observations made in Ohio and elsewhere, he is of the opinion that the migrations, in most cases at least, occur at intervals of five years; and if he be right, the squirrels, which are now exceedingly abundant again in southern Wisconsin, may be expected to migrate in the autumn of 1857.* He further says that the migrations observed by him in southern Wisconsin occurred when the mast was excecdingly abundant and the squirrels in good condition. Near Racine they were observed passing southward in very large numbers for about two weeks, at the end of September and the beginning of October, and it was a month before all had passed. They moved along rather leis- urely, stopping to feed in the fields, and upon the abundant nuts and acorns of the forests. So far had they departed from their accustomed habits that they were seen on the prairie, four er five miles from any timber; but even there, as usual, they disliked to travel on the ground, and ran along the fences wherever it was possible. * Since writing the above I have received the following letter from Dr. Hoy: Racine, April 2, 1878, DEAR Str: Black and gray squirrels did migrate in 1857, as predicted. Whether there is a precise interval between their migrations I will not pretend to state, yet they did migrate in this section in 1847, 1852, and 1857, since whieh they have become so scarce that I could not determine whether there was an attempt to migrate or not, as they are nearly exterminated now in this vicinity. In 1857 I knew one negro who stood by a tree, in an open space on the line of a fence, and shot over twenty in one after- noon. In other years one might stand at the same place six months and not see one individual. Yours, P. R. Hoy. 112 The food of the gray squirrel is like that of most of the family. They are very fond of blackhaw berries and mulberries. Four to six young are brought forth at a birth; two and three litters are produced annu- ally, the first usually in March. They are somewhat social, several sometimes feed together, and many will take up with the same tree » in winter. Various species of Squirrels are infested with the larval forms of a species of wstrus. These grubs are found growing in the skin, in the ab- cesses formed by the irritation of the growing grub. They are most fre- quent about the shoulders and buttocks, where the Squirrel cannot destroy them with its teeth. The writer has observed them in the buttocks of about eve-y fifth Ground Squirrel, collected in the vicinity of Menomonee, Wisconsin. “That a fly really emasculates the Striped Squirrel (Tamias striatus), seems certain from Dr. Fitch’s observations. The Doctor reared the fly from the grubs found in the testes, which were completely eaten out.” Professor A. R. Grote, on Squirrels and Emasculation, in ‘“ Forest and Stream, March 21, 1878, says: “There is a belief prevalent among hunters that the Red Squirrel habitually castrates the Black and Gray, also, that the old Gray Squirrel emasculates the young of the same spe- cies. This popular but fallacious opinion, is based, doubtless, in part, on errors in examination of supposably emasculated individuals, mainly in overlooking the testicles, which are small, except in the breeding season, as well as destroyed by the undoubted work of the larve of estrus, and accidental castration in the combats of pugnacious individuals.” Scrurus NIGER Linn. Var. ludovicianus Allen. WESTERN Fox SQUIRREL. 1806. Sciurus ludovicianus, Custis, Barton’s Med. and Phys. Journ., ii, 1806, 43.—Harlan, Fn. Am., 1825, 186.—H. Smith, Griff. Cuv. An. King., v, 1827, 254.—Lesson, Man., 1827, 284—Fischer, Syn. Mam., 1829, 351—Baird, Mam. N. Am., 1857, 251.—Hayden, Trans. Am. Phil. Soc. Phila., xii, 1863, 144—Allen, Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., xiii, 1869, 188. 1822. Sciwrus rufiventer, “Geoffroy, Mus. Par.;” Nouv. Dict. d’Hist. Nat., x, 103.—Desmarest, Mam., ii, 1822, 332 —Harlan, Faun. Amer., 1825, 176 (New Orleans).—Lesson, Man. Mam., 1827, 233.— Fischer, Synop. Mam., 1829, 3851.—Schinz, Syn. Mam., ii, 1845, 6 (specimen. from Missouri).—Maximilian, Weigm. Arch. f. Naturg., 1861, 70. 1823. Sciurus macroura, Say, Long’s Exped. R. Mts., i, 1823, 115 (Kansas). 113” 1825. Sciwrus magnicaudatus, Harlan, Faun. Amer., 1825, 178.—H. Smith, Griffith’s Cuvier’s An. King., 1827, 225.—Lesson, Man. de Mam., 1827, 235.—Fischer, Synop. Mam., 1829, 351.—Bachman, Proc. Zoél. Soc. Lond., 1838, 88; Charlesworth’s Mag. Nat. Hist., iii, 1839, 156; Silliman’s Amer. Jour. Sci. and Arts, xxxvii, 1839, 296.—Wagner, Suppl. Schreber's Siiug., iii, 1848, 166.—Schinz, Syn. Mam., ii, 1845, 11.—Kennicott, U. S: Pat. Off Rep. Agr., 1856 (1857), 56, pl. vi. 1826. Sciurus macrowreus, Godman, Amer. Nat. Hist., ii, 1826, 134.— Woodhouse, Sitgreaves’s Col. and Zufii Rivers, 1853, 53. 1838. Sciwrus subauratus, Bachman, Proc. Zodl. Soc. Lond., 1838, 87; Charlesworth’s Mag. Nat. Hist., iii, 1839, 155; Silliman’s Amer. Jour. Sci. and Arts, xxxvii, 1839, 295—Wagner, Suppl. Schre- ‘ ber’s Séug., iii, 1843, 164— Aud. & Bach., Quad. N. Am., ii, 1851, 67, lviii. 1838. Sturus auduboni, Bachman, Proc. Zoél. Soc. Lond., vi, 1838, 97 (Louisiana; dusky variety); Charlesworth’s Mag. Nat. Hist., iii, 1839, 378.—Wagner, Suppl. Schreb. Siug., iii, 1843, 182.— Schinz, Syn. Mam., ii, 1845, 12.—Aud. & Bach., Quad. N. Am., iii, 1854, 260, pl. elii, fig. 2. 1842. Sciurus occidentalis, Aud. & Bach., Jour. Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila., viii, 1842, 317. 1851. Sciurus rubicaudatus, Aud. & Bach., Quad. N. Am., ii, 1851, 30, pl. lv. 1851. Sciurus sayi, Aud. & Bach., Quad. N. Am., ii, 1851, 274, pl. lxxxix. 1855. Sciwrus limitis, Baird, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila., vii, 1855, 331; Mam. N. Am., 1857, 256 (Texas; immature). 1867. Macroxus ludovicianus, Gray, Ann. and Mag. Nat. Hist., 3d series, xx, 1867, 426. 1874. Sciurus cinereus, var. ludovicianus, Allen, Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., xvi, 1874, 287.—Jordan, Manual Vertebrates, 1878, 28, 2d ed. 1877. Sciurus niger, var. ludovicianus, All.,.U. 8. Geolog. Surv. Terr., vol. xi, p. 718. Varietal Characters—Length of body 12 to 13 inches, ranging from 11 to 14; tail vertebrae 92, ranging from 84 to 104; tail to end of hairs 124, from 11 to 18}. Above dusky-gray, with a strong rufous suffusivn ; ears, feet, and ventral surface fulvous, varying to bright ferruginous. The whole under parts are occasionally black, or mixed black and rufous— never apparently wholly black, or with the under surface pure white. Known from var. niger by its smaller size; besides, niger is gray above and whitish beneath, and occurs only from Maryland to Louisiana. 8 114 Known from var. cinereus by its coloration; the nose and ears in cinereus are usually concolor with dorsal surface; the ears are short, scarcely longer than the fur. Var. cinereus is found from Virginia northward to southern New York and New England, and possibly may lap over into eastern Ohio. Geographical Distribution and Variation—The Western Fox Squirrel occupies the whole region drained by the Mississippi and its tributaries and the Missouri River north to southern Dakota, extending westward along the wooded streams to the plains. The geographical varia- tions attending its wide range of climatic conditions consist in color of an increasing pallor northward and toward the dryer portions of the plains, and in the country adjacent to the Mississippi River is observed a strongly marked increase in color southward. The diminution in size from the north southward is not marked in this variety. The color variations of this form have led te eight or ten different specific names; the animal was first described, however, by Custis, in 1806, under the name ludovicianus. The Fox Squirrel takes more naturally to groves of oak trees or edges of timber belts than to-deep woods; in these places he has ready access to corn fields, which they often rob from the time of roasting-ears until the corn is harvested. e Besides the nuts of trees and seeds of plants, it eats the buds of the basswood, elm, and maple. In autumn they eat the fruit of the thorn- apple. They have been seen to gnaw the bark from dead trees to pro- cure beetles and their larve, and, like other Squirrels, to girdle trees in spring to taste the flowing sap. Unlike the Red Squirrel, the Fox and Gray Squirrels do not store up hoards of nuts for winter use in hollow trees, but bury them singly under the leaves in autumn. Dr. Hoy is of the opinion that they are guided to these solitary caches by the sense of smell, unless the snow is very deep. They do not fail, but scratch away the leaves and snow from the right place and retire to a log or low tree to eat the morsel found. When the snow is deep they feed on buds and such nuts and berries as are left on the trees. Unlike the Gray Squirrel, this species is not gregarious; more than two adults are rarely found together. Usually this species is not polyga- mous; it is less prolific than the migratory species, bringing forth - usually three young at a birth, and probably producing two litters each season. Like those of most animals in this order, the young are misshapen, unsymmetrical little creatures, with large heads and closed eyes. They are brought forth in a hole, the nests of twigs and leaves, of which this 115 species build so many in the forks of trees, being used only as tem- porary summer-houses. This Squirrel is not known to migrate in com- panies; they sometimes cross open country, like other Squirrels, in search of food. It is the shyest of our species; if chased it does not stop on branches or take to the nearest tree, but runs at once to its hole. They are ex- tremely active, rarely lying lazily sunning themselves, as does the Gray Squirrel. Their long bushy tails are in constant motion, as they spring from limb to limb apparently for mere sport. Genus Tamias Iiger. Sciurus, in part, of most early authors. Tamias, Illiger, Syst. Mamm. et Avium, 1811, 83 (type Sciurus striatus, Linneus). Tenotis, Rafinesque, Amer. Month. Mag., i, 1817, 362. Generic Characters—Skull narrowed anteriorly; postorbital processes long, very slender, directed downward and backward; plane of malar bone more oblique, and zygomatic process of maxillary more expanded and depressed than in Scéurus, but rather less so than in Spermophilus ; anteorbital foramen oval, situated in the base of the zygomatic process of the maxillary; upper premolars two or one—when two, the first usually minute; ears of medium size or small, well clothed, but never tufted; cheek pouches large ; pollex with a well developed nail ; tail shorter than the body, flattened and rather broad, shorter and much narrower than in Sciurus; pelage generally full and soft; dorsal surface with two (usually four) longitudinal whitish stripes bordered on each side with a stripe of black, and with, except in one species, a central dorsal stripe of black, known from the smaller species of Spermophilus by the absence or rudimentary character of first upper premolar; weaker and relatively smaller dentition; more delicate and papery skull and more flattened tail; known from Sciwrus by the more slender lower jaw, capacious cheek pouches, and shorter and narrower tail. As above defined, Zaméias includes four species, T. striatus, T. asiaticus, with several localized sub-species, 7. harrisit, and T. lateralis. All are confined to North America except asiaticus, which ranges also over a large part of northern Asia and eastern Europe. Tamias stRiaTus (Linn.) Baird. STRIPED GROUND SQUIRREL; CHIPPING SQUIRREL; CHIPMUNK; also CuIPMOCK. 1731. Sciurus striatus, Catesby, Carol., ii, 1731, 75, pl. lxxv.—Linneus, Syst. Nat., 1758, 64.—Schreb., Siug., iv, 1791, 791—Erxleben, a 116 Syst. Reg. Anim., 1777, 426—Desm., Mam., 1822, 339 (in part).—Harlan, Faun. Amer., 1825, 183 (in part).—Godman, ii, 1826, 142.—Emmons, Quad. Mass., 1840, 68.—Thompson, Hist. Vermont, 1842, 46—DeKay, New York Zodl., i, 1842, 62, pl. xvi, fig. 2. 1756. Sciurus carolinensis, Brisson, Quad., 1756, 185. 1784. Myoxus striatus, Boddert, Elenchus Animal., i, 1784, 122. 1788. Sciurus striatus americanus, Gmelin, Syst. Nat., i, 1788, 150—Fischer, Synop. Mam., 1829, 348. 1820. Taméas americana, Kuhl, Beitrag zur Zodlogie, 1820, 69.—Gray, Ann. and Mag. Nat. Hist., 8d series, xx, 1867, 436 (—T. striatus, Baird). 1829. Sciurus americanus, Fischer, Synop., 1829, 349 (=T. americana, Kuhl). 1829. Sciwrus (Tamias) lysteri, Richardson, Faun. Bor.—Amer., i, 1829, 181, pl. xv.—Doughty’s Cab. Nat. Hist., i, 1830, 169, pl. xv. 1843. Tamas lysteri, Wagner, Suppl. Schreber’s Siug., iii, 1848, 232, pls. cexiv, ccxix.—Schinz, Synop. Mam, ii, 1845, 47—Aud. & Bach., Quad. N. Amer., i, 1849, 65, pl. viiii—Giebel, Siug., 1855, 639.— Maximilian, Archiv. f. Naturgesch., 1861, 79. 1857. Tamias striatus, Baird, 11th Ann. Rep. Smiths. Inst., 1857, 55, foot note; Mam. N. Am., 1857, 292, pl. xlvi, fig 2—Kennicott, Rep. U.S. Pat. Off. Agric. for 1856 (1857), 70, pl. vilii—Thomas, Trans. Ill. State Agr. Soc., iv, 1860, 657.—Gilpin, Trans. Nova Scotia Inst. Nat. Sci., ii, pt. 3, 1870, 15 (Nova Scotia).—Allen, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zoél., i, 1869, 225; Proc..Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., xvi, 1874, 189; Mon. N. A Rodentia, 1877, 782.—Jordan, Man. Vert., 1878. 1861. Sctwrus (Tamias) striatus, Hall, Canad. Nat. and Geol., 1861, 290.— Adams, Field and Forest Rambles, 1873, 100 (New Brunswick). Specific Characters—Length of head and body, 5.75; tail to end of ver- tebree, 3.65, to end of hairs, 4.25; middle of dorsal region gray, passing into rufous posteriorly, with five longitudinal stripes of black, the two outer on either side separated by a line of white; sides washed with yellowish; head above, brownish; whole lower surface of body white; tail blackish above, edged with white, centrally below yellowish-rufous, bordered with black and edged with white; a light superciliary line from nose nearly to ear, which above the eye is nearly pure white; a less distinct light line below the eye, which is nearly white on the lower eyelid; below this a faint stripe of reddish-brown, and another somewhat darker behind the eye; nose whitish; feet like the sides of the body. Unlike most squirrels, the present species preserves great constancy 117 of coloration ; the stripes vary somewhat in width and purity of color. Southern specimens are a little smaller and somewhat brighter colored . melanistic examples are rare in this species. Distribution —This squirrel is found from Pembina, Minn., east to the Atlantic coast and south to Georgia and western Missouri. It is not found on the lowlands of the Gulf coast or southern seaboard. Habits and Habitat —This common and beautiful little squirrel lives in burrows in the earth, usually under stumps, logs, or about fences, in cul- tivated land; it does not habitually climb trees, nor does it leave the woods. Like other ground squirrels this species has capacious cheek-pouches ; they are by habit nut eaters, although they take readily to corn, even at times following the rows of corn like crows, blackbirds, and gophers, and dig out the planted grains, carrying them off to their burrows. have counted as high as sixty grains of dry corn in the cheek-pouches of asingle specimen. A half bushel of hickory nuts and acorns, stored in single burrow, was found in November by Mr. Kennicott. The call isa short, deep ‘‘ clock,” constantly repeated ; sometimes a shrill chip-chip is uttered, whence the common name “Chipping” Squirrel. When frightened he utters a low chatter. This animal can not be regarded as an enemy to the farmer; it is not suspicious, is readily shot or trapped, and driven off by cats and terrier dogs. It increases in numbers as its native forests are cleared for culti- vation, as it is then protected from its natural enemies, the Weasels, preying birds, and even the Mink and Fox. The Chipmunk, wherever it abounds, attracts attention by its beauty, industry, and cheerful activity, and J can not do better than to tran- scribe here from Mr. Kennicott’s article in the Agricultural Report for 1856, a pleasant paragraph descriptive of their habits: “In spring and summer chipmunks make love, rear their young, chase each other over stumps and logs in play, and enjoy themselves in various other ways; and with autumn and its harvest time comes their season of hard work. Weare not to suppose, however, that this work is at all disagreeable to them as a man’s duties are to him, when he will not cheerfully obey the laws of creation. They may now be seen hasten- ing to and from their holes, their cheek-pouches distended with nuts, acorns, and seeds, or with grain stolen from the neighboring fields. These they continue to collect until cold weather has set in, when they retire to their burrows, where, with well-filled lard- ers, they pass the winter comfortably, regardless of the cold winds which rage about them. ‘This species closes the entrance to lts burrows late in autumn, and appears to pass the winter in a state of semi-hibernation ; for, though taking nourishment and not tor- pid, it never comes out, except very rarely in long-continued mild weather.” 118 Genus SPERMOPHILUS. F. Cuvier. Etymology: Sperma—seed ; Philos—lover. Spermophilus, F. Cuvier, Mém. du Mus., ix, 1822, 293; Dents des Mamm., 1825, 161, 255, pl. iv (Type “ Mus cititlus, Linn.).” Spermophila, Richardson, Parry’s Second Voyage, App., 1825, 313 (= Spermophilus, F. Cuvier.) Spermatophilus, Wagler, Syst. Avium, 1830, 22. Citillus, Lichtenstein, Darst. never oder wenig bekannt., Sduget., 1827-34, pl. xxxi, fig. 2. Colobotis, Brandt, Bull. Classe Physico-math. de l’Acad. Imp. des Sci. de St. Petersb., ii, 1844, 36 Otocolobus, Brandt, 1844 (—Colobotis). Olospermophilus, Brandt, 1844. Generic Characters—Skull very variable in form; postorbital pro- cesses generally triangular, strong, and directed downwards; plane of malar turned outward; position of ante-orbital foramen more forward than in Tamas ; upper premolars always two, the first variable in size, generally much larger than in Seiurus or Tamias; grinding-teeth vari- able in strength and size; cheek-pouches well developed; body slender or thick set; tail long, moderate, or short, cylindrical or flattened; ears large, medium, or rudimentary, never tufted; nail of pollex generally undeveloped; pelage and color patterns variable. The above diagnosis includes three sections, in their extreme phases as wide asunder as are most allied modern genera, but well connected through various intermediate specific forms. One of these sections pro- visionally recognized by Mr. Allen as sub-genus Otospermophilus Brandt (emend.), including S. grammurus and 8. annulatus ?-of Colorado and Mexico, tends strongly toward Sciurus. Sub-genus Colobotis, same author, includes S. richardsont, S. empetra, S. mollis, S. spilosoma, and S. obsoletus, with their several varieties, all northern and north-western forms; this group deviates in the direction of Cynomys. The third sub-genus Ictidomys, as characterized by Mr. Allen, inclines toward Tamias; having the ears small, sometimes rudimentary, tail vari- able, skull long and narrow, first upper premolar usually small, and the dentition not heavy; it includes S. tereticaudus of southern California, S. mexicanus from Texas into Mexico, S. tridecemlineatus of the prairie region __ north to the Saskatchewan, and lastly S. franklinz, whose habitat has heretofore been given from northern Illinois and Missouri northward to latitude 64°; this animal is certainly found, however, in the prairie region of northern Indiana, and the following note from Mr. Langdon 119 settles undoubtedly the fact of its occurrence in Ohio: “Dr. R. M. Byrnes informs me that he captured a specimen of this species near Middletown. Ohio; others were seen at the same time. The prairie-like character of that portion of the State ought to be favorable to their existence. It is also reported to occur at Mt. Vernon, Ohio, Dr. Byrnes says, on good au- thority.” From Atwater’s History of Ohio, 1838, we have the following note: ‘We have the Gopher, which lives in our wet barrens.” SPERMOPHILUS FRANKLINI (Sabine) Lesson. Gray PRAIRIE SQUIRREL; GRAY GoPHER; GRAY-HHEADED SPERMOPHILE; FRANKLIN’S SPERMOPHILE. 1822. Arctomys franklini, Sabine, Trans. Linn. Soc., xiii, 1822, 587, pl. xxXvli; ibid, Narr. Franklin’s Journ., 1822, 662.—Harlan, Faun. Am., 1825, 167.—Godman, Am. Nat. Hist., ii, 1826, 109.—Fischer, Syn. Mam., 1829, 343. 1827. Spermophilus franklini, Lesson, Man. Mam., 1827, 244—F. Cuvier, Suppl. Buffon, i, 1831, Mamm., 328.—Wagner, Suppl. Schreb., iii, 1843, 244, pl. cex (“Arctomys franklini, Sabine,” on plate).— Brandt, Bull. Physico-math., Classe Acad. St. Petersh., ii, 1844, 379.—Aud. & Bach., Quad. N. Am., ii, 1851, 248, pl. lxxxiv. Schinz, Syn. Mam., ii, 1845, 67.—Kennicott, Pat. Of. Rep., 1856, Agric. (1857), 79, pl. ix.—Baird, Mam. N. Am., 1857, 314, pl. xlvi, fig. 4 (skull).—Thomas, Trans. Ill. State Agr. Soc., iv, 1861, 657.—Hayden, Trans. Am. Phil. Soc., Phila., xii, 1863, 145. —Allen, Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., xiii, 1870, 189 (Iowa), xvi, 1874, 291; Mon. N. A. Rodentia, 1877, 881——Bishop, Forest and Stream, vii, 1877, 342 (its introduction into New Jersey). 1829.