ALBERT R. MANN LIBRARY NEw York STATE COLLEGES OF AGRICULTURE AND HoME ECONOMICS AT CORNELL UNIVERSITY Cornell Un iversit Library SD 144.N7V59 Some silvi Cultural effects of cutting on AOAUNTMTTA 3 1924 002 931 784 mann SOME SILVICULTURAL EFFECTS OF CUTTING ON THE OVAL WOOD DISH TRACT NEAR MOUNT MORRIS, FRANKLIN COUNTY,N.Y.* by a Henry Vettel 1921 * Report on work done in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Forestry. Cor 7 sD N17 VSF 3272823 TABLE OF CONTENTS, Description and Histery of the Tract - --«---- - Forest Description for Area Studied- - ---=«- - Principal Silvicultural Characteristies of Beech Yellow Birch and Hard Maple ------+--+---- Growth Following Clearcutting - - -------- Composition of Stand------------ Stocking -----+-+-++%+4+%+-+-+4-+-+-+-+-- Height Growth --------+-+-+-+--+--+e- Diameter Growth . Se eerie ee Volume Growth - Boia ou ihe. Sax Tenet eae a ee Young Growth in Small Openings Following Softwood Logging on the Hardwood Type ----------- Reproduction Survey of Land Cleared of Merchant~ able Timber -------2f-7e7 7 2777 -°- - Accelerated Growth of Spruce Following Logging- - ll 15 15 17 83 26 33 38 (1) LOCATION OF THE TRACT, The portion of the Oval Wood Dish Company's lands, on which the following study was made,is situated on the northwest slope of Mount Morris, about three and a half miles from the town of Tupper Lake and about three-quarters of a mile from the state road,on the Mount Morris trail;in Township 25,Franklin County,New York. HISTORY OF THE TRACT. The tract has been logged over by a series of three cuttings. The first cut was made in 1892 for softwood lumber by the A.Sherman Lumber Company. The same operator again cut for hemlock and pulp- wood in 1905. The tract has recently become the property of the Oval Wood Dish Company,who in 19380 logged the area for pulpwood and hardwoods. (2) FOREST DESCRIPTION ( Hardwood Slope Type) The soil is generally a sandy loam,fresh and varying from shallow to deep. The area is fairly well drained throughout. The slope is moderate and generally of northerly exposure. The litter is characteristic of hardwood grewth and varies from two inches to about a foot in depth. The humus is in a good state of decomposition and is an inch to a foot in depth. The ground cover is moderate, consisting largely of herbaceous weeds (wood gorrel, Solomon's seal, bear berry, violets,etc)with some ferns and moss. The underbrush is moderate and made up of atriped maple and witch hobble. The reproduction,in the main, consists of the seedlings and sprouts of beech, yellow birch and hard maple,with a emall amount of spruce scattered over the type. (Note: Miscellaneous species are not taken account of in this description.) The trees found are beech, yellow birch, hard maple and a small amount of epruce. The stand is of fairly good form and quality. Some of the peech and yellow birch are defective due to fungous attack. (3) THE PRINCIPAL SILVICULTURAL CHARACTERISTICSOF BEECH, YELLOW BIRCH AND HARD MAPLE. The principal silvicultural characteristics of beech, yellow birch and hard maple may best be grasped from the following table of comparisons.* Species Seed Production Seedling Growth Periodicity] Amount] Dispersal Rate. Beech Not Annual | Rather} Restricted Slow. Small. Yellow Annual Large Wide Moderate. Birch Hard Annual Large | Moderate Slow Maple Species| Tolerance According Aggressiveness in Reprod to Rank. 1 - Most. Uction, According to Rank. Tolerant. 1 -Most Aggressive. Beech 1 : 3 Yellow 3 2 Birch Hard 3 1 Maple Species Requirements for Rapid Growth. Beech Warmth,humus and shade. Yellow . Cool,moist air and soil,side shade. Birch Hard Moist (well drained)soil and air. Maple The restricted dispersal of beech seed may in part be accounted for by the fact that a large portion of its seed crop is lost through destruction by fungi and animals,and aleo to the fact that its seed , Prothinghan, composition, ment of Agriculture Bul. yy i side --@ The Northern Hardwood ¥orest: growth and management. Bab, 1915. Its United States Depart- (4) is not wind disseminated whereas birch and maple are both distibuted by the wind. Frothingham,1915,states that: “Sugar maple is the most generally aggressive reproducer throughout the beech-birch-maple type. This is un - doubtedly due to the combined tolerance and seeding qualities. Beech,which is probably more tolerant, does not bear large seed crops annually and much of the seed produced is destroyed by animals. Yellow birch,which does bear seed each year,is less tolerant. Its light winged seed are so widely dispersed, however, that many fall where the crown shade is light enough to permit the development of the seedlings. These are adaptable to a great variety of seedbed conditions. Yellow birch thus accomplishes through its reproductive aggressiveness often more than beech can accomplish through ite extreme shade endurance." 45) GROWTH FOLLOWING CLEARCUTTING, The object of this portion of the study was to determine the composition and growth as to height, diameter and volume of the stand of hardwoods formed after clearcutting. A portion of the lower slopes of the hardwood slope type was found which had been cut clear of all trees about 25 years ago. The purpose of the clearcutting was to supply fuel wood to a nearby hauling camp. A series of six one-tenth acre sample plots were laid out on those portions of the area which originally had been densely or fairly densely stock- ed. All trees,both dead and ivinecwere calipered . by inches and tenths, beginning at one inch D.B.H. After all the trees had been tallied, the mean sample tree was determined by means of basal area. (Total basal area divided by the number of trees.) This mean sample tree was found in the stand and cut at the root collar,and measurements taken for the use of pressler's and Schiffel's formulae. Pressler*s Formula. V-LB* HAa Schiffel's Formula. V-(L4Bt+Gb4)*H \6) Where B base at the root collar. bs base at half the total height. W total height. Htd height at which the diameter is half thatat the root collar. The volumes were then applied to the plots. (Volume of mean sample tree X the number of trees) The result was the total volume per plot. ae GROWTH FOLLOWING CLEARCUTTING, The results following clearcutting are as follows: COMPOSITION OF SECOND GROWTH, From Table and Diagram it is found that of the three hardwood species, the larger portion, 40.0%,of the stand is made up of hard maple,with yellow birch, 37.8%, second and beech, 15.8%, last. It has been found that beech, birch and maple seeds, all germinate well on exposed mineral soil mixed with humus. Their best development is attained on well drained,fairly deep loamy soils,but of these three species, birch requires the largest amount of moisture in the superficial layers of the soil. The soil on this area was found to be a well drained moderately deep,sandy loam. At the time of cutting the seedbed conditions fot the three species had been rendered good because at the hauling camp,which had peen situated there,work animals had been allowed to run loosed over the cutover area nearby. This resulted in a well worked seedbed in which the soil and humus were well mixed. Since the soil requires ment for the species was amply met on the area, the varying percentages of species found are influenced by the following reasons. The dominance of maple is probably due to ite natural aggressiveness in (8) seeding of cutover areas. The large percentage of yellow birch is most likely dependent on the moisture content of the soil. The area bordered the upper limits of the spruce flat type,where the amount of moisture was quite large,one of the requirements for the best development of yellow birch. In the case of beech,its restricted seeding,its non-aggressiveness in reseeding cutover areas and the need for shade for best development,accounts for the small percentage of the stand it occupies. 1° (9) Table 1. Plot No. | Beech | Fel. Birch Hd.Maple iweel. ee 8.6 Ot od. 58.6 Je 3 16.9 42.9 40.08 0,0 3 38.8 356.6 ool 8.5 “ Lose Shed 4.6 Lead. 5 5.0 28.9 Dy « & Ged 6 18.2 re ed 25. Ga? AVERAGE 15.8 ote 40.0 6.4 PERCENTAGA COMPOSITION OF S#COND GROWTE GARDWOCDS AFT#AR CLAARCUTTING, (10) 0b ds Tee F BA aTden’ PH VOLTA’ TOA yoood *TTSOS TH aTdenq DpH TOITA’ TOA. yooed “TT908 TH eTden* py WOITA* TOA yooog *TTS08 TH oTden* pH UIT * TOA yooed “TTOOS TH eo Tdew ‘oH YOITA* TOA yo oeg “TTE08 TH aTden pn YOITA * Tak qoe og *“TTS08 TH eTdew* PH YOITE TOA qooog AVERAGE Plot 6 Plot 5 Plot 4 Plot 3 Plot 6 Plot 1 ,us01eg a ate alie Siae W aa e ae RS Bele aT Ns wea alee tates! nae! Maio (11) STOCKING, Tables and Diagrams show the total number of dead and living trees per acre; the average of the six one-tenth acre plots taken was 1115 living trees per acre. This indicates the density of stocking was the result of clearcutting. This dense stocking is one of the necessities of a good second growth stand since it furnishes the individual competition, which tends to give better form and quality to the trees. Diagram shows that since the establishment of the stand, 36.29% of the total number of trees have died, but their competition undoubtedly had a beneficial effect on the rest of the stand. Those trees which were fell- ed and examined showed that during the last few years the growth was beginning to slow down. This was probably because the density of stocking,after the stand reached and age of 25 years,was too great to insure the best growth. (13) Table 3. Plot \o.[Nunber of Trees Per Acre Percentage Living Dead Living Dead d L166 1350 46.2 52.8 a 1420 950 2.8 “uel ° 1310 480 73.% po.8 4 1060 440 C57 S548 5 1140 $70 Tes o+.5 6 OU 50 75.6 ROS AVERAG&# | 1115 635 Oss TL 36.20 COMPARISON OF NUMBER AND P&RCki GAGE OF DEAD AND LIVING Th##5 PER ACRE, "89074 DeSP MOUS 1UFTOM IUSTT JO BSauTT*s9eT} BUTATT mous SouTT AACOH » WLOL | | | | | | | : 9002 00093 O00S OO0F 0008 0002 OO0T Heol, JOo°on °9 40Td °S 49Td °“% 4OTd (13) *¢ Old °*2 3OTd °T 4°0Td | ] | | ] : oorT 009 OOF 002 dsoory FO°ON “eqyoTd oe dues uo Deseg ) : NI SPYFVHL DNIAIT Due aVad JO NOS TUVdNOD sa a ae ee es te (14) ‘g9924 peep MOUS IUSTOM YUFTT Jo eouty'soery BuTATT mous SsuTT AACOH x YOVETAV O24 O9 OS OF O¢ 0g OT 0 ,UsoIId °9 4OTd *S 3°Td °*> 2°ld "€ 4OTd °*g 40Td “T 4°Td Oz 09 os OF de 0g OT 0 4yueoim8g (787,070 oTdues 9 uo posed ) ; : ‘SaNVLS GOOMGUVE HLsoso GNOOFS NI SF7¥YL ONIAIT GNV AV@d FO FOVANZOMYd FO NOK TeVdWoo ¢ wersetq (15) GROWTH OF STAND - - HEIGHT, From Table the height growth of the hardwocds will be found to be on the average 45.6 feet or by taking growth per species per year,based on the mean sample tree:=- Beech = - - - 1.8 ft.per year. Birch - - - - 1.7 ft,per year. Maple - -- - 1.9 ft.per year. or an average height growth of almost two feet per year. This excellent growth is due to site and the density of stocking. GROWTH OF STAND - — DIAMETER, Table shows the average diameter of the stand at 25 to 30 years to be 3.8" or by species, (mean sample tree) at 25 yearsi- Beech - - — 3.94 inches Birch = - = 3.68 inches Maple - - — 3.56 inches (16) Table 3. M&AN CAMPLE Tad MAASUREVANTS, Plot| Species |Age |D.B.H | Height | Volume Mean Sample Tree( CuFt) No. M.S. 7. Yrs |Incn Feet. Schifrel's | Pressler's Formula Form) 1 Yel.Bircen|35 4.1 | 47.0 ed eo 3 Hd.Maple |o5 5.0 44.6 Lat bo? 3 Yel. Biren | ZY ad 41.6 6.0 Beta te 4 Hd.wazle [36 Og f 7.1 ee) Bio 5 Yel. Biren | 35 3.6 42.8 2.0 isd. 6 |Beech 36 4.1/| 46.3 2.5 2.5/7 6 Yel... Bi reh | 30 4.15 | 48.6 Dad 3.3 Table 4 fOLUMs OF S#COND GROWTH HARDWOODS. Plot Wo. Volume per Acre.(Cords) Schirtfel Pressler Average i 32.70 66.64 Bo eet 3 83.40 1g .50 61.45 3 23.55 26.78 62.06 & 2D.UU 65.00 35.00 5 oe ae 23.30 om. 78 6 14.73 Ley Fe 14.76 6 18.26 19.43 18.85 AVERAGE 35.80 26.20 Be. In converting cubic feet to cords the factor of 90 cubic feet to a cord was used. (17) GROWTH OF STAND = - VOLUME, Tables and Diagrams give the results found for the volume of the stand. The average volume per acre is shown to be 22.5 cords or an average mean annual increment ,in Tables and Diagram ,of .91 cords or 3.86% This gives the excellent yield of almost a cord per acre per year for second growth hardwoods,at 25 to 30 years. From a comparison of Diagrams and the general statement may be formulated, that the volume of a stand is in direct proportion to the basal area, which is indicative of density of stocking. 18) , ¥ FOV UZAY 9 40Td GS 3°Td % 40Td g 49Td & 4°Td T }0Td | \ | oose Q00¢e OOoST lodt QO 3e9e7 OTAQNO “WUOV UFd ( 3eee OTAND pue Spsop JSEYNNTOA JO NOS TYVdNOO % werse td (19) Get a) ZOVUZAV 9 4°Td GS 3°Td ¥ 3°9Td g 401d & 40Td COT T 40Td \ \ | G2 OS Se 0 498g ezenbs *“SLOId JO VZV IVSVd TWL0L FO NOY IYVdNOO G wersetq (20) Table 5 MEAN ANNUAL INCREMENT OF SECOND GROWTH HARDWOODS. Plot No. M.A.1.( Cords) 1 L.18 2 86 3 93 4 .96 5 91 6 60 AVER AGE 91 (31) “ENZNZUONT IVANNY NAVIN FO NOSIUVaNOO 9 weIzvetq ZOVUGAV "9 49Td “Ss 2 OTe ‘} 101d "€ 40Td *S 30Td °T 4°Td epr09 (32) YOUNG GROWTH IN AMALL OPENINGS FOLLOWING SOFTWOOD LOGGING ON THE HARDWOOD TYPE, On another portion of the hardwood slope type,33 sample plots varying from one-twentieth to one-tenth acre in are were laid out in such places,where at the time of the ocuttingd in 1896 and 1905, s0ftwoods were taken out singly or in groups. On these areas all trees were calipered and tallied by one inch D.B.4H, classes. Stand tables were prepared from which figuree on the percentage of composition could be based. Trees up to a D.B.H. cf six inches were used in making these tables,since the number of trees dropped off rapidly beyond that diameter. Those above six inches D.B.4. were assumed not to have composed part of the young advance growth or the seedlings that started after the loggings. Tables and Diagrams show beech to form 60.74% of the stand,with hard maple at 8.05%, birch 7.06% and spruce 8.13% An examination of table shows beech to dominate in every D.B.H. class, with maple second and birch a close third. This tend to show that the cutting of the softwoods and thereby the breaking up of the crown canopy,admitted a relatively small amount of direct sunlight to the ground. Those hardwoods which dominated in the stand had a natural tendency to close the crown openings rapidly by (23) increased growth of their crowns. The above conditions gave rise to a situation which only the beech could properly meet through its tolerance. 234) Table 6 SOUPOSETION OF YOUNG GROWTH FOLLOWING SELECTION WWe. Trees Pon Pape Cteg = &, species Lae ¢ D.B.H.} Beéch| Yelicw | dra | Scruced] Hiscel.| Total inches Birch Maple I oo4 a5 58 3 56 347 2S oe. 12 o 3 46 160 3 41 8 4 3 26 84 4 17 2 3 2 B 38 5 g 2 3 2 5 al 6 8 o5 | 8 3 2 14.5 roraL | 400 | 46.5 | »s 14 145 658.5 Table 7 PERCFNTAGs OF TR#azS BY SPECI2£S IN # ACh DIANA TAR CLASS. B.B.8.| Beton Yeliow Hard Sp ruce Miscel. Birch | Maple. i 67.44 6.34 ©.32 .86 16.14 3 56.88 7.50 5.63 1.35 28.75 3 48.81 S.52 4.76 3.87 33.34 4 53.18 6.25 ¢.38 6.35 B5.0u 5 42.86 5.53 14.27 § .53 23.81 6 55.18 3.45 10.79 13.79 13.78 (25) OV of 02 OT Q "HLMOUS ONNOA JO NOILISOds100 WOVANTOUEd 2 wersetd *TTSsoe TH sonidg eTdeW PIeA YOItTG MOTTSA qoesd quooled (a6) REPRODUCTION SURVEY OF LAND CLEARED OF MERCHANTABLE TIMBER, All data for this phase of the work were taken on a portion of the hardwood slope type similar to the other area except that this part of the type was better drained. The area was cut over for softwood lumber 39 veer ago, then again 15 years ago for hemlock and pulpwoods and for all merchantable pulp- wood and hardwoods in 1920. These cuttings gave a . final condition very similar to clearcutting. Survey strips were run through the type. All trees were calipered by inch classes beginning at one inch D.B.H. At every two chains sample plots one rod square were laid off and a count made of all young growth below .6 inches D.B.H. The data presented are based on the measurements of 25 sample plots,each one square rod in area. Table and Diagram show hard maple to make up the larger portion, 74.02%,of the stand, beech next, 20.61%, and yellow birch last,3.58% Tables and show the original composition of the stand and the remnant left after cutting. These data show that in the original stand maple dominated,with beech next and birch last. In the remnant left after cutting, only a few good yellow brich seed trees were found, which probably were not enough to properly reseed the 327) area. Another point to be considered is that the seedbed conditions were rather unfavorable for birch since the area was well drained and liable to drying out due to the opening up of the stand and since the cover of hardwood litter did not allow the seeds to get to the mineral soil where they might germinate. The third point to be brought out if the fact that the time which has elapsed since the last cutting has not been long enough to enable the seeding of these openings with birch. It will be seen from Table and Diagram that spruce constitutes a very small portion of the young growth,in percentage only .03% or six seedlings of saplings per acre. The reasons that spruce will not reseed the area are;unfavorable seedbed and insufficient moisture. The fairly large amount of hardwood litter makes a poor seedbed. The seedg may germinate on the leaves but their roots are unable to get through to the mineral soil, because of the impenetrable texture of the hardwood leaves. The litter also sheds water easily and dries out, leaving the seedlingd without the required amount of moisture. Another disadvantage lies in the fact that apruce seed is often dispersed before the hardwood leaves fall. This tend to cover the seed to such a depth that a fairly large proportion of the seedlings are killed,by lack of light, too much heat,and too humid (28) growing conditions,since the seedlings are not able to push through the covering of litter. A plentiful supply of moisture is essential at the time of germination and nthroughout the period of establishment. The area on which the data were taken was found to be well drained and did not have a plentiful supply of moisture. The amount of moisture in the soil was made legs,to some extent, by the drying out of the soil due to exposure through cutting. (39) Table 8 COMPARTSOwW OF THE NUMR&R OF SfZDLINGS AND PARCENTA GA COMPOSITION OF Tin REPRODUCTION. Species No.Of Seedlings | Percent cf Total Beech 4155 @0.61 Yoel. Biren 719 3.58 Hd.Marle 14859 74,08 Sieruce 6 03 “iscel. $53 is 76 TOTAL 200738 100.00 (30) | ab002 COT WL0u "TTSOS TN eonadgs eTdew prey YoItg MOTTOR qoeed | I | | t | OO00ST O000T 000g 0 ‘ar08 red ‘on I | | | | 08 09 OF 02g 0 quooileg “NOILONdoudz4 TAL JO NOILISOdNOO FOVANTOUTd PUB FUOV UFd SONTIWAGIS JO axGWNNN JO NOSIUVdHOO Q wersetq (31) Table 9 SRIGINA), STAND bAroRA OUTTiaG.* D.P.u|Beech | Birch | Maple | 8.ruce | Misceil. 4 Le Ce 6.31 8.42 5.68 65.42 5 6.84 5.79 7.90 5.79 1.56 6 wie oe Ll 5.26 6.84 25S 7 1 38 sod 6b 4.241 ido 8 4.736 Do e.61 6.64 9 1.58 2.61 2.10 a6 16 4.72 3.61 oog li 2.10 63 LG g 6.10 o.08 DS 13 1.58 7.38 14 1. Do «od Silo «DO LS wo 5908 is 20 2:10 wae 17 1.05 aid 15 25S 1s DO “oS 20 dine i208 21 soo 1:05 28 2.10 28 dD B4 1.08 BOD 1.58 =6 soe a7 1.05 3% oe TOTAL |@owle | 26.32 | 70.57 67.04 Loos * Number of trees per acre. (32) Table 10 EPph ANT Le P? APTFR CUTTING.* DB. . | Beech | Pimon | Megie Spruce | Mige@el 2. 4 4.07 oO Lis BS 5 Ba Bo 85 LOO .00 6 2.00 ~33 1.33 7 1.&? wis “OF 1 x tthe 5 «SF 108 sot lado 67 o Lsvw 1.38 Ls do 10 coe -67 Led G7 GF li 1s87 ote eo ~ 5d lo 67 14 250 iS 10d 16 Le 18 233 Le 20 el awe ate TOTAL LS. 1.68 | 5.do ¢ .88 1.00 Peroeent of Original : Stand Doel | 10. | TF. 7s 56.14 lias * Number of trees per acre. (33) ACCERLERATED GROWTH OF SPRUCE FOLLOWING LOGGING, The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of cutting on growth in volume of spruce, released from suppression. The trees from which the data were gathered were situated on the lower slopes of the hardwood type,adjoining the upper limits of the spruce flat type. This are had twice been cut over for softwoods, thereby releasing the trees. These cuttings gave the remaining stand almost full light. The remaining softwoods were cut in 1920 and these trees,which had not yet been removed in logging,offered the material from which the required data were gathered. Tables and Diagrams show the remarkable growth in volume due to the releasing of the spruce from suppression. A comparison of average diameters at the stump,at the time of release (25 years ago) and the stump diaméters at the present time,showe the following results. Average diameter 25 years ago---=- 5.5" Average diameter at present- - ~ - ee Percent increase in diamter---- 123.64% The increase in volume due to relesse in trees, which at the age of cutting averaged 127 years equalled = (34) 83.35% of the total volume. This result must not be taken as the criterion for what spruce will do after release from suppression,since the site was a very favorable one for this species. The area was immediatly adjacent to the spruce flat type. The sOilwas of good quality with sufficient moisture for good spruce growth. A fairly large amount of hardwood litter which had ample opportunity to decay when the stand was opened would also tend to increase growth. An interesting feature of the accelerated growth is that not only the younger trees but also the older ones responéed equally well to release from suppression. In fact the oldest tree,168 yre old,made an increases growth equal to 87.4% of the total volume,while the youngest tree,84years old,made and increase growth of 86.8% of the total. The data are however quite meagre and so it cannot definitely be said that all ages of trees respong equally well to release from suppression. \35) Table 11 Tree Age Volumes(CuFt){ Percent No. |Total/At Time Of] Yrs of Accel Total Acceler.| Accel.Grwti Accelerat, Growth Growto | is of Total dL 183 158 24 8.75 C55 (a0 3S 170 145 65 29.38 23.0% 78.4 3 117 Sl 26 6.80 5.05 %1<0 4 110 84 26 16.45 114.38 86.8 5 193 166 : 26 29.40 Oe 87.4 6 150 120 30 8.98 7.91 88.1 e 174 1428 32 44.90 40.05 89.2 8 145 it3S 33 54.30 23.68 53.3 COMPARISON OF TOTAL VOLUM2 AND VOLUME DUE TO ACCALHRATAD GROWTH OF SPRUC# R&aLEASED FROM SUPPRESSION. “UYMOIS PoYeIaTadOe 01 ONN oMNTOA BMOTS SUTT VUSTOM TEIUSTI swnNToA Te104 SMOUS SUTT AAPOH » 8°ON Sot (36) SE 2°ON @dTy SO°ON aor G°ON Sedy Z°ON aor) C°ON DdL] S°ON eazy i T “On Self I | | | | | oF G2 0g ST OT S 0 Rooq otang "ONILLNO AG NOISSTHddNS WOT AESVFTFN Fonuds JO HLMOUS AFLVUFTZOOV OL ZN FANTOA CUS FANIOA WLOL JO NOSINVdNOO 6 werZetq S°ON SOL] L°ON Ser O°ON 9erL G°ON Secs PON SOIL C°ON Sery S°ON 9OaL (37) T°ON S024 ! | | OOT 0 qusoieg “HIMONS IVLOL FO SI ALMOND GFLVURTZOOV HOTHM weSVINZOURd ONIMORS LEVHO OT wersetq (38) SUMMARY Growth Following Clearcutting. (1) On site adapted to the growth of beech, birch and maple,but hwere there is a fairly abundant supply of moisturein the surface and subsurface layers,maple and birch will make up the large portion of the stand in almost equal percentages,with beech forming the lesser portion. (3) Clearcutting results in a very densely stocked stand in which the mortality is high in early life. (3) Height growth amounted to about two feet per year. (4) Diameter growth was about four inches in 25 years. (5) The stands showed an average volume growth of -91 cords per year or an M.A.I. of 3.86%. Young Growth in Small Openings Following Softwood Logging. (1) In small openings beech made up the larger portion of the standdue to its extreme tolerance. (3) Spruce is almost wholly crowded put a&fter selection cutting,in percentage of the total stand it occupies only 2.13%. Reproduction Survey of Land Cleared of Mechantable Timber. (1) On typical hardwood land,heavily cut and having only a small amount of moisture in the surface layers, maple made up about 75% of the etand, beech 20% and yellow birch about 4%. (35) (3) Spruce is almost absent in the reproduction on typical hardwood land heavily cut,in percentage only .036. Accerlerated Growth of Spruce Following Logging. (1) Spruce released from suppression about 25 years ago,made in that time an increased growth of 126.64% or the accelerated growth equalled 83.35% of the total volume. he & ~ = ‘ / i 5 2 _? * 2 ‘ * » 4 . 3 4 J , ¢ 4 : ain 8 &