4 A ncient Classics for English Readers EDITED BY THE REV. W. LUCAS COLLINS, M.A. HERODOTUS 9 <>9 7 CONTENTS OF THE SERIES. HOMER : THE ILIAD, HOMER: THE ODYSSEY, HERODOTUS, C^SAR, , VIRGIL, HORACE, /ESCHYLUS, By XENOPHON, CICERO, SOPHOCLES, PLINY. By A. EURIPIDES. JUVENAL, . ARISTOPHANES, . . . By the Editor. . . By the Same. . . By George C. S wayne, M.A. ... By Anthony Trollope. .By the Editor. , , . . By Theodore Martin, the Right Rev. thb Bishop of Colombo. . By Sir Alex. Grant, Bart., LKD. .By the Editor. . . By Clifton W. Collins, M.A. Church, M.A., and W. J. Brodribb, M.A. By William Bodham Donne. By Edward Walford, M.A, . . . By the Editor. HESIOD AND THEOGNIS, By the Rev. James Davies, M.A. PLAUTUS AND TERENCE, ... By the Editor. TACITUS, .... By William Bodham Donne. LUCIAN,.By the Editor. PLATO.By Clifton W. Collins. THE GREEK ANTHOLOGY, ... By Lord Neaves. LIVY,.By the Editor. OVID,.By the Rev. A. Church, M.A. CATULLUS, TIBULLUS, & PROPERTIUS, ByJ. Davies, M.A. DEMOSTHENES, . . By the Rev. W. J. Brodribb, M.A. ARISTOTLE,... By Sir Alex. Grant, Bart., LL.D. THUCYDIDES,.By the Editor. LUCRETIUS, . . . . By W. H. Mallock, M.A. PINDAR, ... By the Rev. F. D. Morice, M.A HEKODOTUS c nr GEORGE C. SWAYNEj M.A. UTI FELLOW OF CORPUS CHRISTI COLLEGE, OX 1 PHILADELPHIA: J. B. LIPPINCOTT COMPANY. BOSTON COLLEGE LIBRARY TA .S°iA? | ^0 126080 CONTENTS. PAGE INTRODUCTION, . • • • • • 1 CHAP. I. CRIESUS, . • . • • • • 11 it II. CYRUS, . . 25 it III. EGYPT, .... • * • • 40 it IT. CAMBYSES, . . • • • • 65 it Y. DARIUS, • • • • 75 n VI. SCYTHIA, # • » • 86 n VII. THE TYRANTS OF GREECE, • • • • 100 ii VIII. IONIA, . w . t . g >••'* . -i .* • V • • • 114 it IX. MARATHON, . . " . V U r - ■ V - • t . 131 n X. THERMOPYLAE, • V* • • 142 It XI. SALAMIS, • • • • 156 <• XII. PLATJSA AND MYCALE, . • • • • 166 II XIII. CONCLUDING REMARKS,' • • • • 178 INTBODUCTION. So little is known for certain regarding the life of Herodotus, “ the father of history,” that it may well be a subject of congratulation that he has not shared the fate of Homer, the father of poetry, in having doubt thrown on his individual existence. He appears to have been born about the year 484 before Christ, between the two great Persian invasions of Greece, at Halicarnassus, a colony of Dorian Greeks on the coast of Asia Minor. His family was one of some distinction. From his writings alone we should know that he received a liberal education, and became familiarly acquainted with the current literature of his day; and the epic form of his great prose work, besides numberless expressions and allusions, bears witness to the fact that the Homeric poems were his constant study and model. His early manhood v 7 as spent in extensive travels, in which he accumulated the miscellaneous materials of his narrative. He visited, in the course of them, a great part of the then known world; from Babylon and Susa in the east, to the coast of Italy in the a. c. vol.' iii. £• 2 UERODOTUS. west; and from the mouths of the Dnieper and the Danube in the north, to the cataracts of Upper Egypt southwards. Thus his travels covered a distance of thirty-one degrees of longitude from east to west, and twenty-four of latitude from north to south—an area ol something like 1700 miles square. It was an immense range in days when there were few facilities for locomo¬ tion, and when e^ery country was supposed to be at wai with its neighbours, unless bound by express treaties of peace and alliance. He travelled, too, it must be remembered, in an age when robbers by land and sea were members of a recognised profession,—very lucra tive and not entirely disreputable : when (as we shall see hereafter) disappointed political or military adven¬ turers took to piracy as a last resort, without any sort of compunction. “ Pray, friends, are you pirates,—or what 1 ” is the question which old Nestor puts to his visitors, in the ‘ Odyssey,’ without the least intention either of jesting or of giving offence. A voyage itself was such a perilous matter, that a Greek seaman never, if he could help it, lost sight of land in the daytime, or remained on board his ship during the night; and at a later date the philosopher Aristotle distinctly admits that even his ideal “brave” man may, without prejudice t: his character, fear the being drowned at sea. The range of our author’s travels is, however, less wonderful than their busy minuteness. He is traveller, archaeo¬ logist, natural philosopher, and historian combined in one. He appears scarcely ever to have concluded his visit to a country without exhausting every available source of information. Personal inquiry alone seems to have satisfied him, wherever it could be made ; though consulted carefully all written materials within his INTRODUCTION. 3 reach, records public and private, sacred and secular. He rightly calls his work a “ History,” for the Greek word “ history ” means really “ investigation,” though it has passed into a different use with us. In Egypt alone he seems to have spent many years, visiting and exploring its most remarkable cities—Memphis, Ilieropolis, and the “ hundred - gated ” Thebes. In Greece proper, as well as its colonies on the Asiatic seaboard and in South Italy, and in all the islands of the Archipelago, he is everywhere at home, as well as in the remoter regions of Asia Minor. Such details of his life as have come down to us rest on somewhat doubtful authority. It is said that he was driven from Halicarnassus to Samos by the tyranny of Lygdamis, grandson of that Queen Artemisia whose conduct he nevertheless, with some generosity, immortalises in his account of the battle of Salamis; that in Samos he learned the Ionic dialect in which his history is written; that in time he returned to head a successful insurrection against Lygdamis, but then, finding himself unpopular, joined in the Athenian colonisation of Thurium, in Italy, where he died and was buried, and where his tomb in the market-place was long shown. His residence at Samos may have been a fiction invented to explain the dialect in which he wrote, which was more pro bably that consecrated by usage to historical composi¬ tion. At one time he appears to have removed to Athens, where he received great honours, partly in the substantial shape of ten talents (more than £2400), after a public recitation of his history. According to one story, he was commissioned to read it before the Assembly of all the Greek States on the occasion of 4 HERODOTUS. the great national games held every fourtli year at Olympia in Elis. Amongst the audience on some such occasion, most, probably at Athens, a young Athenian, Thucydides, is said to have been present; and the introduction which then took place may have given the first stimulus to the future historian of the Peloponnesian war, who, despairing of surpassing his predecessor as a charming story-teller, boldly struck out for himself a new path, as the founder of the critical method. It seems also that at Athens Herodotus enjoyed the friend¬ ship of the great tragic poet Sophocles. Plutarch has preserved the opening words of a poem in which the tragedian compliments the historian, after he had quit¬ ted Athens for Thurium. In two of the tragedies of Sophocles, the ‘ (Ed ip us at Colonos’ and the ‘Antigone,’ are passages plainly adapted from this history. The society of Athens under Pericles, comprising all that was most select and brilliant in art and intellect, must have had great attractions for Herodotus; and it im¬ plies some self-denial on his part to have torn him¬ self away from it. Probably he longed to exercise, as most Greeks did, full political rights, which, as an alien, he could not enjoy at Athens, though he was evidently an enthusiastic admirer of her institutions. After his emigration to Thurium, he seems to have devoted his life to the elaboration and amplification of his great work. Several passages in his history prove that he was, at all events, acquainted with the earlier events of the great Peloponnesian war. The balance of evidence seems to point to his death having occurred when he was about sixty. If so, he at least escaped witnessing, as the result of that war, the hill of his INTRODUCTION. 5 beloved Athens from her well-won supremacy over Greece. The history of Herodotus is a great prose epic, sug¬ gested doubtless to the author in early life by the fame of those events which were still fresh in the minds of all men—the repulse of the Persian invasion, and the liberation of Greece. The Greeks had thrown off col¬ onies, from time to time, into the islands of the Levant and the west coast of Asia.* These Asiatic Greeks had actually been enslaved by Persia; and European Greece, though free from the first, could only wake to the full consciousness of that freedom when the overshadowing dread of the monster Asiatic power had been dissipated. Independence could be but a name for either Athenian or Spartan, so long as the very sight of the Persian dress (as Herodotus tells us) inspired terror. Until Miltiades won Marathon, by a rush as apparently desperate as our Balaklava charge, the Persians had been reputed invincible. Their second expedition against Greece was intended to repair the damaged prestige of Persian valour, by setting in mo¬ tion overwhelming numbers. It seemed as if the dead weight alone of Asiatic fleets and armies must carry all before it. It did indeed carry Athens, but not the Athen¬ ians. The sea-fight of Salamis was won by citizens who had lost their city. The two great victories which fol¬ lowed within a year—Platsea and Mycale, gained on the same day—indicated for ever the superiority of Europeans over Asiatics. The latter was fought out * Of these colonies, some were Ionian, some Dorian, and some fl£olian, having been originally founded by each of these old Greek races. But Herodotus usually speaks of them all as r< lonians,” as these took the most active share in the war. 6 HERODOTUS. on Asiatic ground—the beginning of the great retribu¬ tion which has continued even to the present time, represented by uncertain tides of Western conquest gradually gaining ground on the East. Never before or since has an author employed him¬ self with grander subject-matter than Herodotus. The victories of Freedom in all ages, more than any other conquests, have stirred the human heart to its depths. It is the cause that alone humanises war, and makes it other than brutal butchery. Many such victories there have been in the course of time, but all of local and limited importance in comparison. And, indeed, per¬ haps Marathon made Morgarteri possible. By Salamis and Plataea the world may have escaped being oriental¬ ised for ever, and bound in the immobility of China. These battles, by saving freedom and securing progress, anticipated the overthrow of the Saracens before Tours, and of the Turks before Vienna. Herodotus, indeed, could not see all this, when the plan of his great his¬ tory dawned on his mind, but the salvation of his be¬ loved Greece was to him a sufficient inspiration. We find the same unity of design in the history of Herodotus as in Homer’s great epic. As in the ‘Iliad,’ not the siege of Troy but the wrath of Achilles is the continual burden, so, in our author’s work, not the his¬ tory of Greece but the destruction of the great Persian armada is its one great subject. All the other local histories, though introduced with much fulness of detail, are subordinate to this consummation. They How to it like the tributaries of a river, whose might and grandeur make men love to explore its sources. I lo gives us in succession the early history of Lydia, of Babylon, and of Assyria, in order to trace the rise INTRODUCTION. ? and fall of those several Asiatic powers which merged at last in the great empire of the Modes and Persians, who are the actors in his true drama, to which these preliminary histories are a discursive prologue. His work is not a romance founded on fact, like Xeno¬ phon’s ‘ Education of Cyrus,’ or Shakspeare’s his¬ torical plays, or Scott’s ‘ Quentin Dunvard.’ It is serious history, as history was understood in his time. But the historian’s appetite was omnivorous in the collection of materials, and robustly digested fable and fact alike. His mind was like that of Froissart and Philip de Comines, who lived in another age, when miracles were thought matters of course. Yet in He¬ rodotus we perceive the dawning of that criticism which finds its full expression in Thucydides, who was in mind a modern historian, though less fastidious as to the evidence of facts than a man of our century would be. The incredulity of Herodotus, when it shows itself, seems rather evoked by the suspected veracity of his informant, or some contradiction in phenomena, than by the incredible nature of the facts themselves. He has been nu'ist found fault with for ascribing effects to inadequate causes ; but we ought rather to feel grateful to him, considering the mould in which the mind of his time was cast, for endeavouring to trace the connection between cause and effect at all. In Homer the gods arc always in requisition, and always at hand to manage matters, even in minutest details. That Herodotus had a religious mind there can be no doubt, for he speaks even of foreign and barbaric rites and beliefs with intense respect. And the great Liberation War of Greece was, in its circumstances, cal¬ culated to illustrate one great pervading principle of his 8 HERODOTUS. religion—tliat heaven will not allow an excess of mortal prosperity. The rock which overhung the hay of Salamis, whence Xerxes looked down on his host, might well bear the statue of Nemesis. Nemesis, in the religious system of the ancient Greeks, is the great divine stewardess, who assigns to man his quota of good or of evil. If man takes to himself more good than his share, she adjusts the balance by giving him evil; for the gods are jealous of those Avho try to vie with them. Did not Apollo flay Marsyas for daring to contend with him on the lyre 1 Did not Minerva change Arachne into a spider for boasting to be a better spinster than herself 1 So the Sovereign of the gods cannot endure the luxury and pride of the earthly despot. It becomes the business of Nemesis to com¬ pass his destruction. She invokes against him Atk, or Infatuation. At6 blindfolds his mind, and forces him to enter of his own will on the path whose end is destruction. To ward off this, men resort to sacrifice; but any sacrifice short of what is most precious is use¬ less. Polycrates, the despot of Samos, almost insults the gods in supposing that throwing a jewel into the sea w T ill atone for the crime of prosperous sovereignty ; the ring comes back to him in a fish brought to hi3 table. Was not Agamemnon compelled to sacrifice his daughter, the pride of his house, before he could obtain a fair wind to sail to Troy ? It seems to have been an article of the Athenians’ creed, which Herod¬ otus shared, that there was a sort of wickedness in one free man attempting to rise above the level of his fellow-citizens; and perhaps they thought that then honourable punishment of ostracism was devised as TXT I, Ob CCTIOX. 5 rhuch for a groat man’s good as for theirs.* Tt was a kind of inverted doctrine of the divine right of kings, traces of which we find throughout the Attic literature. Had Herodotus lived in our day, we may imagine that his attention would have been powerfully arrested by the fate of Napoleon the First, or the Czar Nicholas of Russia, as illustrating this sentiment. Frequent references will he found in these pages to Mr Rawlinsoji’s ‘ History of Herodotusbut it is desired here to acknowledge more distinctly the use which has been made of his exhaustive volumes. • The History of Herodotus was divided by iho an¬ cients into nine books, each bearing the name of one of the Muses. His own order of narration is very dis¬ cursive, for he digresses into local history and anecdote continually. In these pages a rearrangement into chapters will perhaps be more welcome to the general reader. * Ostracism was so called from the oyster-shells on which Athenian citizens wrote their names in voting. Any man of more than average greatness or goodness was liable to incur this left-handed compliment, Avliich consisted in his being re¬ quested to go abroad for a term of years, in case a sufficient number of votes was given. It was instituted as a security to democracy, and as preventive of coups d'etat. It was dis¬ credited at last by its application to the case of a vulgar dema¬ gogue. The Syracusans had a similar institution called “ Petal* ism,” from the leaves of olive on which the names were written. THE HISTORY OF HERODOTUS. CHAPTER L CROESUS. tf And ever, against eating cares, Lap me. in soft Lydian airs.” —Milton, “ L’Allegro.” Tn the great quarrel between Europe and Asia, which is the end and scope of our author’s work, it is of the utmost consequence to the satisfaction of his religious principles that the balance of blame should incline to the side of the true offenders. According to the show¬ ing of the Persians themselves, who had their story¬ tellers, if not historians, the Asiatics were the first of¬ fenders. A Phoenician skipper went to Argos, and carried off Io, the king’s daughter, to Egypt, whither he was bound. By way of reprisals, the Greeks then carried off two women for one— r Europa from Tyre, and Medea from Colchis. This may have partly excused Alex¬ ander or Paris, son of Priam king of Troy, for carry¬ ing off Helen, the wife of Menelaus, from Sparta, in the second generation afterwards. But then, said the Persians, the Greeks put themselves clearly in the wrong 12 THE HISTORY OF HERODOTUS. —for instead of carrying off another lady, they made the abduction of Helen a case of war. “ To carry off women was manifestly the deed of unjust men, but to make so serious matter of their abduction was the part of simpletons, since they hardly could have been car¬ ried off without their own consent.” Indeed, accord¬ ing to one account, Io at least eloped of her own free will. But in fact, our historian thinks, from the time of the Trojan war the Asiatics looked upon the Greeks as their natural enemies. Without discussing too curiously all these tales, Herodotus has no doubt in his own mind that the blame ought to lie with the Asiatics, since Croesus, king of Lydia, was the first historical aggressor._ Be¬ fore his time all the Greeks were free, and he was the first Asiatic potentate Avho, by fair means or foul, reduced Grecian states to various kinds of dependency. The towns on the coast he subdued by force, easily enough. He had proposed to try the same means with the islanders of the Archipelago, when he was dis¬ suaded from his purpose by a shrewd jest. Among other travellers who visited his court was one of the Seven Wise Men of Greece—Bias of Priene. The king asked him, as he did all His visitors, what was the last news? “The islanders,” said Bias, “are busy raising a force of cavalry with which they mean to invade Lydia.” Croesus declared it was the very thing he could wish,—but he hardly believed they could be so utterly foolish. Bias ventured to think that the Greek islanders would be equally amused to hear that the Lydians intended to attack them on their own element. The king took the hint: and it is the earliest specimen we have of the wisdom which after- CROSS US. 13 wards so often clothed itself in the language of the “ Court Fool.” The Lydians appear to have been a people, like the Egyptians, of nearly immemorial civilisation, and, like the Asiatic tribes who fought for the Trojans, to have had a common origin with the Greeks themselves, and to have differed little from them in manner's and cus¬ toms. There is manifest truth in the tradition which connected them with the Etruscans and the Pelasgians; and their three dynasties, of the second of which Her¬ cules was said to be the founder, may have represented three cognate races of conquerors, like the Saxons, Danes, and Hormans with us. They appear to have been at first a warlike people, but to have been ener¬ vated by conquest, and then, like the descendants of the ancient Italians, to have become chiefly famous as artists; especially as musicians. This Croesus, the son of Alyattes, in time extended his empire over most of the countries westward of the river Halys. He was, in some sort, the Solomon of his age; fabulously rich, magnificent in his expenditure, and of unbounded hospitality; so that great men came to visit him from all parts, and to gaze on the splendours of his court. Amongst them was Solon the Athenian. Solon had remodelled the laws of Athens, with the concurrence of the Athenian people , but, knowing the fickleness of his countrymen, had gone into voluntary exile for ten years, having bound them by oath that they would make no change in their institutions in his absence. Croesus, in the course of his conversations with Solon, wished to extract from him the confession that he considered him the happiest of mankind. Solon refused to account any man happy till death had t4 THE HISTORY OF HERODOTUS. set its seal on his felicity, and took occasion to warn Croesus of the instability of all human affairs, dilat¬ ing especially on the jealous nature of the gods. The king could not brook the plain-speaking of his guest, and dismissed him in disfavour. He was soon to prove the truth of his warning: the terrible Nemesis, says our author, was awakened—probably, he thinks, by this very boast of thinking himself the happiest of mortals. Then he goes on to tell, in his own delightful fashion— The Story of Adrastus. Croesus had two sons—the one grievously afflicted, for he was deaf and dumb, but the other by far the first of the youths of his age, by name Atys. Now Croesus dreamed that he should lose this Atys by the stroke of an iron weapon. Through fear of this dream, he took him no longer with him to the wars, but sought out for him a wife who might keep him at home. Nay, he even had all the weapons that hung in the men’s rooms stacked away in the inner chambers, lest any of them might fall on him by accident. While the mar¬ riage was preparing, there came to seek refuge at Sardis a Phrygian of royal birth who had committed homi¬ cide. Croesus purified him with the due rites, and then inquired his name. He said, “ I am Adrastus, son of Gordias; I slew my brother by misadventure, and my father has turned me out of doors, and I have lost all.” And Croesus answered, “ Thou art the son of a friend, and art come to friends; with me thou shalt lack nothing. Thou wilt do best to bear thv mishap as lightly as thou mayest.” About this time it came to pass that a huge wild boar came out of CIKES US. 15 Mount Olympus in Mysia and laid waste the fields ; and the people came to Croesus and besought him to send to them his son to help them with the hunting- train. And Croesus, mindful of the dream, refused to send his son, but promised to send the train and picked sportsmen of the Lydians. But his son Atys coming in, was much vexed, and said, “ Thou bringest me to shame, my father, in the eyes of the citizens and of my bride, in that thou dost forbid me to go to the wars and the chase, as though I were a coward.” But Croesus said, “ I hold thee no coward, yet I do wisely, for I was warned by a dream that an iron weapon should slay thee; therefore did I give thee a wife to keep thee at home. For thou art in truth my only son, for the other I count as though he were not, being deat and dumb.” Then answered the son, “It is natural, my father, to take good heed on my behalf, after such a dream. But what iron weapon hath a boar, or what hands to hurl it 1 If indeed thou hadst dreamed that I should die by a tusk, thou wouldst be wise in doing what thou doest, but not now, for this war is not with men.” Croesus confessed him self persuaded by these words, and allowed his son to join the chase ; but he begged Adrastus to go with him and guard him, lest any evil should happen by the way; and Adrastus, though heavy of heart, deemed that he could deny Croesus nothing in return for his kindness, and went accordingly. So the hunters made a great hunt, and having brought the boar to bay, stood round and threw javelins at him. And it came to pass that Adrastus threw his javelin, and missed the boar, and killed the son of Croesus. So the dream was ful¬ filled. Now Croesus, when he heard the news, was 1G THE HISTORY OF HERODOTUS. sorely troubled, and in his anguish called on Jupiter as lord of purification, as lefrd of the hearth, as lord of companionship, to witness what he suffered at the hands of his suppliant, his guest, and the man whom he had sent to guard his son. And now came the Lydians hearing the corpse, and behind them followed the slayer, Adrastus. And he, standing before the bier and stretching forth his hands, besought Croesus to take his life, as he was no longer worthy to live. Then Croesus, though in great grief, pitied him and said, “ Thou hast made full atonement, in that thou hast judged thyself worthy of death. Thou art not to blame, hut as a tool in the hands of some god, who long since did signify to me what should come to pass.” So Croesus buried his son, and spared Adrastus. But when he was departed, Adrastus, as thinking him¬ self of all men the most wretched, slew himself upon the tomb. And Croesus mourned for his son for the space of two years. But at the end of that time he was fain to bestir himself, for there came to him a rumour that Cyrus the Persian had conquered the Medes, and was exalting himself above all the kings of the earth ; and he hasted, if it were possible, to crush the Persian power before it became too strong. Croesus, in Herodotus’ story, appears in close rela¬ tions with the god Apollo. The world-famous shrine of this god was at Delphi on Mount Parnassus, currently believed to be the exact centre of the earth—the earth itself being looked upon as a round disc. In the temple there, the site of which was supposed to be the spot where the serpent Python was slain by the arrows of the Sun-god, there was an oracle, the most renowned C1MESUS. 17 in tlie world. Its answers, in spite of tlieir ambiguity, guided the public and private affairs of the Greeks to an extent which appears to us now almost ludicrous. Though generally vague and perplexing, yet they were often so much to the point, that some of the old Fathers of the Church attributed them to Satanic influence, as they doubtless would table-turning and spirit-rapping, if they lived now. It was also believed that their efficacy ceased exactly with the coming of our Lord, by which time, at all events, faith in them had worn out. Milton alludes to this tradition in his “ Hymn on the Nativity — “ The oracles are dumb ; No voice or hideous hum Runs through the arched roof in words deceiving. Apollo from his shrine Can no more divine, With hollow shriek the steep of Delphos leaving. No nightly trance, or brea^.Ad spell, Inspires the pale-eyed priest from the prophetic cell.” Before he determined on his expedition against Cyrus, Croesus sent to test the most famous oracles in Greece and that of Jupiter Ammon in Libya, in order that he might know which was most to be trusted. And he made the trial thus : he told his messengers to ask each oracle, on the hundredth day after their departure, what Croesus was doing at that particular hour. The other answers are unrecorded, but the answer of the priestess of Apollo at Delphi ran thus:— “ Truly the tale of the sand I know, and the measures of ocean— Deftly the dumb I read, I list to the voice of the silent. A. c. vol. iii. B THE HISTORY OF HERODOTIS. 1 8 Savour lias reached my sense from afar of a strong¬ skinned tortoise Simmering, mixed together with flesh of lamb, in a caldron ; Brazen the bed is beneath, and brazen the coverlet over.” Croesus, when he received this answer, judged the god of Delphi to be the wisest, since he alone could tell exactly what he was doing—for he had been cooking the flesh of a tortoise, mixed with lamb’s flesh, in a brass caldron with a brass lid. Accordingly lie sent rich presents to the shrine of Apollo, and ordered all his sub¬ jects to pay him especial honours. Thus having satis¬ fied himself that this oracle at least /vas true, he next sent to inquire if he should go to war with the Per¬ sians. The answer was, that if he did so “he would ruin a great empireat which answer Croesus rejoiced greatly, for he expected to destroy the empire of the Persians. He sent a third time and inquired of the oracle if his reign would be longl And the oracle answered :—- “ When it shall come to pass that the Medes have a mule for monarch, * Lydian, tender of foot, then along by the pebbles ot Ilermus Flee, and delay not then, nor shame thee to quail as a coward.” Croesus rejoiced still more when he heard this, for he thought that, as a mule could never reign over men, the rule of himself and his descendants would never come to an end. / His next step, still under the advice of the oracle, was to make friends of the most powerful Greek states. At this point Herodotus, having wound his readers up to the expectation of a catastrophe, like some C IKE SITS. 10 modern novelists, diverges into one of his favourite episodes, and takes advantage of the fact that Crcesus found the leading Greek states to he the Lacedemon¬ ians and Athenians, to relate a part of tlieir history. At Athens, Pisistratus, the son of Hippocrates, had now raised himself to absolute power. Athens being di¬ vided between the parties of the Plain and the Coast, he had headed the third, called the party of the Mountain, and by pretending that his enemies had wounded him, managed to be allowed a body-guard, and then seized on the citadel. He had some vicissitudes of fortune before he was firm in the saddle, and on one occasion returned to Athens in a chariot accompanied by a woman of great beauty and stature, who personated the goddess Atlienk (Minerva).* The success of the imposition is possible, if we remember that the early Greeks be¬ lieved that the gods sometimes came down visibly among mortals. By whatever devices, however, he gained or secured the sovereignty, he appears to have ruled well and righteouslv, and to have done much, for the civilisation and glory of Athens. The Spartans or Lacedaemonians were now beginning to assert the leadership which they afterwards ob¬ tained in the Peloponnese, as a consequence of those laws of Lycurgus, whose sole end and object was to make Sparta a model barrack for a state of soldiers. With the Spartans Croesus had no difficulty in con eluding an alliance, as the path of friendship had * If he liad also been accompanied by the owl of that goddess, the case would have been very like one which occurred in the remembrance of this generation, when a fugitive prince landed in France with a tame eagle on his shoulder 20 THE HISTORY OF HERODOTUS. "been paved by a previous interchange of gifts and civilities; they had also heard of the Delphic pro¬ phecies. He immediately proceeded to commence a campaign against the Persians by marching into Cap¬ padocia. A sensible Lydian made one last effort to dissuade him. “ 0 king,” said he, “ thou art about to march against men who have trousers of leather, and all the rest of their dress of leather, and they feed not on what they would like but on what they have ; for their land is rough. Hay more, they are unacquainted with wine, being water-drinkers, and they have no figs to eat, nor anything else that is good. If thou conquerest them, thou canst get nothing from them, for they have nothing to lose ; if thou dost not, thou wilt lose all thine own good things. There will he no thrusting them hack when once they have had a taste of what we enjoy; nay, I thank the gods that they do not put it into the mind of the Persians to march against the Lydians.” In undertaking this war, Croesus was prompted partly by ambition, partly by his desire to punish Cyrus for dethroning Astyages, the king of Media, who was his brother-in-law. Crossing the river Halys,* the northern boundary, he advanced to the country near Sinope, on the Black Sea—in modern times notorious as the scene of the destruction of the Turkish fleet by the Kussians. Here Cyrus marched out to meet him. A battle took place in which both sides claimed the victory. Croesus, however, thinking his numbers too small for ultimate success, determined to fall back on Sardis, and begin the war again after the winter with larger forces. He sent round to his allies to tell them to join him in four * Now the Kizil Irinak. CIKES US. 'Al montlis’ time. But liis long course of prosperity was drawing to its close. Cyrus had not been so crippled by the battle but that he could march straight to Sar¬ dis and so “bring the news of his own arrival.” Croe¬ sus, though surprised, led out the Lydians to meet him. They were at this time as good men of war as any in Asia. They fought, like the knights of chivalry, on . horseback, with long lances ; and the plain before Sar¬ dis was the bettle-field of their predilection. But Cyrus invented a device to paralyse this cavalry. Taking advantage of a horse’s natural fear of camels, he or¬ ganised a camel brigade and placed it in his front, with infantry behind it, and his own cavalry in the rear. Though the Lydian knights, like the Austrians at Sem- pacli, dismounted and fought on foot, the battle went against them, and Croesus soon found himself besieged in his capital. Then he sent messengers to his allies urging them to help him with all speed. The Spartans, even had they been able to reach Sardis in time, could not set out at once, as they hap¬ pened just then to have their hands full. They were fighting with the men of Argos about a tract of borderland called Thyrea. Argos had been in the old Homeric times the head of the Peloponnesus, and was always very jealous of Spartan supremacy. The plausible plan had been adopted of fighting out this particular quarrel by three hundred chosen men on each side; though three on each side, as in the affair of the Horatii and Curiatii between Pome and Alba, might have answered the purpose quite as well. The combat proved as deadly as that between the rival Highland clans recorded by Scott in his ‘ Fair Maid of Perth.’ Two only of the Argives were left, 09 — U THE HISTORY OF HERODOTUS. who ran home with the news of the victory; while a single Spartan, raising himself up from amongst a heap of dead, remained in possession of the field and set up a trophy. So the result was considered indeci¬ sive, and the main armies fell to fighting, and the Spartans conquered. Then the Argives shore their hair, which they formerlv wore long, and bound them¬ selves under a curse noc to let it grow again till they had recovered Thvrea, and forbade their women to wear gold ornaments—a prohibition probably more difficult to enforce. The Spartans, in retaliation, made a contrary vow, to let their hair grow, having worn it cropped before. The survivor of their three hundred was said to have slain himself for shame. In the mean time Croesus was a lost man. The citadel of Sardis had been scaled by the Persians at a point where a king of old had omitted to carry round a lion, which was to operate as a charm to prevent its being taken. It has been mentioned that Croesus had a son w r ho was deaf and dumb. His father had tried in vain all means to cure him of his affliction, and given up the attempt- in despair. But now, wfflen Sardis was taken, a soldier approached Croesus, not knowing w r ho he was* to slay him; and Croesus, in his deep grief, did not care to hinder him, which he might have done by giving his name, since Cyrus had issued express orders to his army that the king of Lydia w r as to be taken alive. Then suddenly the tongue of the youth was loosed, and when he saw the Persian approaching, he cried out—“ Fellow, do not kill Croesus!” and having made this beginning, he continued able to speak for the rest of his life. Thus Croesus w r as taken prisoner, after a reign of fourteen years, and Cyrus, in the cruel spirit ol uit at. i us. _ j the age, placed him on a pile of wood, with the inten¬ tion of burning him alive. Then Croesus bethought him of the w T ise words of Solon, how r.o man should be accounted happy until the end, and in his anguish called aloud thrice upon Solon’s name. Cyrus asked the meaning of the cry, and when he heard the story, was so touched that he ordered the pile, which was already lighted, to be put out. But this could not be done by all their exertions until Croesus prayed to Apollo for aid, when suddenly a great storm of rain came on and extinguished the fire. Cyrus treated his royal prisoner with all honour. When the Persian soldiers began to plunder Sardis, Croesus inquired of his conqueror what they were doing. “ Spoiling thy goods, 0 Croesus.” “ Kay, not mine,” replied the fallen monarch, “ but thine, 0 Cyrus.” Then Cyrus stopped the sack of the city, and in grati¬ tude for the suggestion of Croesus, begged him to name any favour he could do him. “ My lord,” said he, “ suffer me to send these chains to the god at Delphi, and to ask if this is how lie requites his benefactors, and whether ingratitude is an attribute of Greek gods in general 1 ” For Croesus had loaded the shrine of Apollo with costly presents. The message was sent, and the priestess of the oracle made this reply : “ Croesus atones for his forefather Gyges, who slew Candaules his mas¬ ter. Apollo desired that the judgment should fall on the son of Croesus and not on himself, but the gods themselves cannot avert fate. The god did what he could, for he deferred the fall of Sardis three years beyond the destined time : secondly, he put out the fire, and prevented Croesus being burnt alive : thirdly, he did not give a lying oracle, for he only said that 24 THE HISTORY OF HERODOTUS . Croesus should destroy a great empire, without saying what empire it should he. Croesus had no right to interpret his words according to his own wish. As to the oracle about the mule, he might have known that Cyrus was a Persian by his father’s side and a Mede by his mother’s, and so a hybrid king.” Croesus was obliged to acquiesce in the explanation, and to take his fate patiently. His ruin was, indeed, no common bankruptcy. “ As rich as Croesus ” soon grew into a vernacular proverb. Yet he was by no means a bad specimen of the millionaire. His gentleness and good¬ nature were as proverbial as his wealth, and Pindar, the Theban poet, testifies to this point—doubtless for substantial reasons of his own — “ Of kindly Croesus and his worth The name doth never fade.” The strange vicissitudes of his life became a fertile subject for Greek romancers and moralists. His riches seem to have been derived partly from the grains of gold brought down in the sand of the river Pactolus, which made Asia Minor the California of antiquity. This was doubtless the origin of the fable of the Phrygian king Midas turning all that he touched to gold. It seems that Sardis in early times was an important place of trade, as Herodotus says that the Lydians were the first coiners of money and the first storekeepers, so far as was known. It was at the same time notorious as the great slave-market of the world CHAPTER It CYRUS. i “ Not vainly did the early Persian make n is altar the high places, and the peak Of earth-o’ergazing mountains, and thus take A fit and unwalled temple, there to seek The Spirit, in whose honour shrines are weak Upreared of human hands.” —Byron, “Childe Harold. * Before the Medes or Persians made their appearance in history, the Assyrians, according to Herodotus, had ruled over upper Asia for five hundred and twenty years. Asshur appears in Scripture * as a son of Shem, who went out from the land of Sliinar and founded Nineveh. Herodotus is supposed to have written a sepa¬ rate nistory of Assyria, which has been lost; hut Layard and others have deciphered for us a new history from the monuments of that wonderful empire. The bearded kings and warriors, with their wars and lion-liunts graven on sandstone slabs, which are to be seen in the British Museum and in the Louvre in Paris, look as fresh as if they had been sculptured yesterday instead of nearly three thousand years ago. The Assyrians were of the Semitic race, of the same family as the * Gen. x. 11, 22. 20 THE HISTORY OF HERODOTUS. Jews and Arabs; while the Medes and Persians were, in Scriptural phrase, of the sons of Japheth—that is, they belonged to the same Aryan, Iranian, or Indo* Germanic family as the Greeks and Romans, and our¬ selves. The home of the Assyrians and their cognate Babylonians was in the great plain of Mesopotamia, while the Medes lived in the mountains to the east, and the Persians to the south-east. The Median high¬ landers, being of more hardy habits, first conquered the Assyrian lowlanders, and then, descending to their softer country and habits, were conquered in their turn by the hardier Persians. The decline of Assyria was consummated by the fall of Nineveh, which was taken, about b.c. 625, by Cyaxares, third king of the Medes, in conjunction with the Babylonians. The first king of the Medes is said to have been Deioces, who built the wonderful city called by Herodotus Agbatana,* and less correctly by later writers Ecbatana, with its seven circular walls, one within the other, with the palace and treasuries in the centre. The first wall had white battlements, the second black, the third scarlet, the fourth blue, the fifth orange. The last two walls had their battlements silvered and gilt. They rose one above another on a conical hill, and were sup¬ posed to have had a symbolic meaning, as referring to the sun, moon, and five planets, or the deities pre¬ siding over the days of the week. The last king of the Medes was Astyages, the son of Cyaxares. He had given his daughter Mandane in marriage to Cam- 1 >yses, who was, according to our author’s account, a poor Persian gentleman, but according to later autho ritics, a descendant of the first Persian king Achae * In tlie Behistuu inscription it is Hagmatana. CYRUS. 27 menes. Astyages dreamed that lie saw a vine spring from the body of his daughter Mandane, which over¬ shadowed the whole of Asia. We know from Scrip¬ ture how much stress the Chaldeans and the Medes laid on dreams. Fearing that an offspring of Mandane would deprive him of his sovereignty, Astyages or¬ dered the son that was horn of her to be destroyed. The courtier Harpagus, who was commissioned to do this, passed on the child to one of the royal herds¬ men, that he might expose it to die upon the moun¬ tains. But the herdsman’s wife, when she saw that it was “ a proper child,” and plainly of noble birth, adorned for death with gorgeous apparel, took pity on the infant, and as she had just lost one of her own, persuaded her husband to expose the dead child, and save the living one, that she might nurse it. So the future Cyrus lived, while the herds¬ man’s child received a royal funeral. When the boy was ten years old he was playing one day with the children of his village. The game was King and Courtiers. Cyrus was chosen king, and assumed the dignity as if he had been born to it, appointing officers, architects, guards, couriers, and an official called the King’s Eye,* (possibly the head of the detective police). * This officer is introduced in Aristophanes’ comedy of ‘ The Acharnians. ’ He appears in a mask (as in a modern burlesque) with a single huge eye in the centre. He is brought to Athens bv some envoys who have been at the court of Persia. Dicmo- polis (an honest farmer who is present at the reception) is in¬ dignant at their waste of time and the public money. “Envoy. —We’ve brought you here a nobleman—Sham-artabas By name, by rank and office the King’s Eye. Dicceop .—God send a crow to peck it out, say I ! And yours th’ ambassadors’ into the bargain.” —Fkerf’s TraneL 28 THE HISTORY OF HERODOTUS . In carrying out his character, Cyrus ordered one ol the children, the son of a Median of high rank, to l> flogged for disobedience. The angry child went t< the city and complained to his father, who in tun complained to the real king. Astyages ordered th( despotic urchin to be brought into his presence. Tin abashed, however, the boy justified himself; and this circumstance, together with a strong family resem¬ blance, led to his recognition by the grandfather, who came at the truth by examining the herdsman andHarpa- gus. He now dissembled his wrath, pretended that he was glad the child had been saved, and invited Harpagus to send his son to be the companion of the young prince, and to come himself to dinner. After Harpagus had well feasted, Astyages asked him how he liked his entertainment; he said it was excellent. Upon this, a basket was shown to him containing the head, hands, and feet of his own son, on whose flesh he had been feasting. The father, with the dissimulation natural to the subjects of an Oriental despotism, observed that whatsoever the king did was right in his eyes. It is the very answer which the son of Ethelwold is said by William of Malmesbury to have made when King Edgar showed him his father’s corpse, slain by him in the royal forest; the English chronicler having evidently borrowed from Herodotus. Astyages now consulted the Magi (a caste of priests of whom we shall hear more hereafter) as to what was to be done. They said that they considered that Cyrus had ceased to be dangerous, since he had been king already in the children’s play. So Astyages sent him away into Persia, to his real parents. Meanwhile cm us. 29 Harpagus r arsed his revenge, till Cyrus was grown to man’s estate, and then he felt his time was come. He sent a letter to the noble youth sewn up in the belly of a hare, bidding him put himself at once at the head of the Persians, and revolt from Astyages. This king —surely under some infatuation from heaven, says the historian—forgetting the deadly wrong which he had done Harpagus, sent him to suppress the revolt. He deserted to Cyrus, and the Medes were easily defeated. Thus Cyrus destroyed the great Median empire, and substituted that of the Persians—becoming, after the downfall of Croesus, master of all Asia. He treated his grandfather Astyages with all honour to the day of his death. There was a religious as well as a political dis- sidence between the two nations. They both wor¬ shipped the elements and “all the host of heaven,” and planetary deities; but the Persian national creed recognised both a good and an evil principle in nature,, constantly at war, whom they called Ormuzd and Aliri- man. The Persians, according to Herodotus, eschewed images, temples, and altars, and sacrificed to the ele¬ mental deity on the tops of mountains. But lie has evidently confused the Median worship with theirs. Their habits much resembled those of the old Ger- mans, as described by Tacitus. They were originally a simple people, and compulsory education with them was limited to teaching their sons “ to ride, to draw the bow, and speak the truth.” Hext after lying, they counted running in debt most disgraceful, since “ he who is in debt must needs lie.” Lepers were banished from society, as they were supposed to • have sinned against the sun; even white pigeons being put under 30 THE HISTORY OF HERODOTUS . taboo ” for a similar reason.* They were very much given to wine ;t and discussed every subject of import¬ ance twice—first when they were drunk, and again when they were sober. As water was a sacred ele¬ ment, none might defile a river—a sanitary regula¬ tion in which we moderns would do well to follow them. The bodies of the dead presented a difficulty. They might not be buried, for the earth was sacred; or thrown into rivers, for water was sacred ; or burnt, for fire was sacred. They were therefore exposed to be torn by birds and beasts — a fate of which the Greeks had the greatest horror. The Parsees of India, ami the native Australians, dispose of their dead in much the same way. As a compromise, adopted from the Magi, a body might be buried when covered with wax to prevent its contact with the earth. The Persians, when they had conquered the Medes, soon degenerated from their earlier simplicity, which is celebrated by Xenophon in his romance of the ‘ Education of Cyrus.’ When Cyrus, by the defeat of Croesus, had made himself master of Lydia, the Greek colonists on the Asiatic seaboard sent to him in alarm, and begged to be allowed to be his vassals on the same terms as they had been to Croesus. He answered them by a scornful parable : “ There was a certain piper who piped on the * So to this day, in India, all white animals are looked upon much in the wav in which we ourselves regard albinoes—a kind of unhealthy lusus naturae. + Their successors retain the taste. “ It is quite appalling,” says Sir H. Rawlinson, “ to see the quantity of liquor which some of these topers habitually consume, and they usually pre¬ fer spirits to wine.” CYRUS. 31 sea-shore for the fish to come out, hut they came not. Then he took a net and hauled out a great draught of them. The fish, in their agonies, began to caper. But he said, ‘ Cease to dance now, since ye would not dance when I piped to you.’ ”* This answer drove the Ionian Greeks to fortify their towns and send ambas¬ sadors to Sparta for assistance. Their envoy, however, disgusted the Spartans by wearing a purple robe and making a long speech—two things which they de¬ tested ; and they voted not to send the succours, but despatched a fifty-oared ship to watch the proceedings of Cyrus. When this vessel reached the port of Phoctea, a herald was sent on to Sardis to warn Cyrus from the Spartans not to hurt any Greek city on pain of their dis¬ pleasure. This caused Cyrus to inquire who these Spar¬ tans were, and how many in numbers, that they dared to send him such a message. When he was informed he said, “ I am not afraid of people who have a place in their city where they meet to cheat each other and forswear themselves ” (meaning the agora or market-place); “ and if I live, the Spartans shall have troubles enough of their own, without troubling themselves about the Ionians.” Cyrus had other business on his hands at present than to punish the Greeks; he therefore went back to Ecbatana, leaving a strong garrison in Sardis. But while he was on his way he heard that one Pactyas had induced the Sardians to revolt, and was besieging the garrison in the citadel. Troops were sent to put down the revolt; Pactyas, however, did not v r ait for tlieii arrival, but fled to Cyme, on which the Persian general demanded his extradition. The m( n of Cyme sent to * This Eastern apologue may serve as an illustration of the parable in Matt. xi. 16. 32 THE HISTORY OF HERODOTUS. ask advice at a neighbouring oracle of Apollo, and the answer came that Pactyas was to be given up. Some of the citizens, not satisfied with this answer, thought the envoys must have made a mistake, and sent again to remonstrate with the god, but the answer was repeated ; whereupon Aristodicus, the principal envoy, went round the temple and cleared away all the nests of sparrows and other birds that he found there. While he was thus engaged, a voice came from the sanctuary,—“ Unholy man, darest thou to tear my sup¬ pliants from my temple ? ” on which Aristodicus, by no means abashed, replied,—“ 0 king, thou canst protect thine own suppliants, and yet thou orderest the Cym- seans to surrender theirs.” “ I do,” answered the god, “ that you may the sooner perish; for it was in the naughtiness of your hearts that you came to consult me on such a matter.” * Eventually they sent Pactyas to Chios for safety ; but the Chians gave him up to the Persians, even tearing him from the temple of Minerva ; and Atarneus, a district opposite Lesbos, was paid them as the price of blood. Put there was a curse on the produce of Atarneus for ever. The Persians now proceeded to punish the revolted Lydians and Ionians, and Harpagus, the king-maker, who had deposed Astyages, forthwith beleaguered Phocsea. The inhabitants of this city, however, pre¬ ferred exile to slavery; taking an oath never to * The remarkable answer attributed here to the oracle may Berve to illustrate the permission given to Balaam to go with the messengers of Balak. Even to the heathen mind, there were questions of conscience so clear, that to consult heaven specially in the mattei was a mockery [See the almost parallel case of Glaucus, ch. viii ] C\ 7? PS. 3o return until a bar of iron, which they sank in the sea, should rise and float, they set sail, and, after a multi¬ tude of adventures, found a resting-place on the coast of Italy. Most of the other towns on the coast were subdued after a gallant resistance, and the islanders gave them¬ selves up. Then Harpagus turned inland against the Carians and Lycians. The Carians deserve notice as the reputed inventors of crests to helmets, and of heraldic devices. The Lycians were early advocates of the rights of women; naming men not after their fathers, as was usual, but after their mothers. The Lycians of Xanthus * made a desperate resistance. Finding they could not beat the Persians in the field, they made a great pile on which they burnt their wives and chil¬ dren, and all their valuables, and then sallied out and perished in battle to a man. Their example was imi¬ tated by Saguntum in Spain in the second Punic war. While Harpagus was thus subduing the coast, Cyrus was pursuing his conquests in Upper Asia. . He turned his arms against Labynetus, king of Babylon. This renowned city, says our historian, formed a vast square fifty-five miles in circuit. Its double walls were 340 feet high (nearly as high as St Vincent’s rock at Bristol) and 85 feet thick. The measurements seem enor¬ mous, yet the great wall of China shows such works to be possible, when absolute power commands un¬ limited labour. The city itself was cut in two by the river Euphrates, the quays being fenced by walls with * About thirty years ago the British Museum was enriched by some beautiful marbles brought from Xanthus by an expe¬ dition which explored Lycia under the conduct of Sir Charles Fellowes. a. c. vol. iiu o 34 THE HISTORY OF HERODOTUS water-gates for communication. One half contained the king’s palace, the other the great sacred tower ol Belus (Bel or Baal) ivith its external winding ascent. Babylon was in fact a fortified province rather than a city ; it resembled Jeddo in Japan, in being a collec¬ tion of country houses with small farms and gardens attached. It seems to have been the ideal of what a great city ought to be, especially in days of internal railroads. London, containing its millions, with its thin houses laterally squeezed together, or Paris, with its horizontal piles of flats, and no corresponding spaces, would have excited the horror of the an¬ cients, who in some respects were more civilised than ourselves. Herodotus attributes the great engineering works about Babylon, to prevent the Euphrates from overflowing the country, chiefly to two queens, Semira- mis* and Hitocris, between whom he places an interval of five generations. Of this latter he relates a striking anecdote. ■ “ She built for herself a tomb above the most fre¬ quented gateway of the city, exactly over the gates, and engraved on it the following inscription : ‘ If any of the kings of Babylon who come after me shall be in need of money, let him open my tomb and take there¬ from as much as he will; but unless he is in need, let him not open it, else will it be worse for him.’ How this tomb remained undisturbed until the kingdom fell to Darius. But he thought it absurd that this gateway should be made no use of—for it was not used, because one would have had to pass under the dead body as one * This queen appears to have really reigned in conjunction with her husband. She is probably not the great queen known by the same name. c me, s. 35 went out—and that when money was lying there idle, and calling out for some one to take it, he should not lay his hand on it. So he opened the tomb and found no money at all, but only the dead body, and these words written—‘ If thou wert not the greediest of men, and shameless -in thy greed, thou wouldst not have disturbed the resting-place of the dead.’ ” Although the author notices most of the wonders of Babylon, he makes no mention of the hanging-gardens, which excited the astonishment of later writers. Nebu¬ chadnezzar is said to have constructed them out of affec¬ tion for a Median wife, that she might not be afflicted with a Swiss longing for her native mountain scenery.'* Having defeated the Babylonians in battle, Cyrus drove them inside their huge walls. There they laughed at his efforts, having good store of provisions for many years. But their enemy proved himself as good an engineer as any of their queens, historical or fabulous. Taking advantage of reservoirs previously existing, he turned off by a canal the waters of the Euphrates, and the Persians walked into the city dry- shod by the bed of the river, even the water-gates having been left open by incomprehensible careless¬ ness. Those who were in the centre of the city, say° Herodotus, were still feasting, dancing, and revelling, after the Persians had entered. It is the night de¬ scribed in the Book of Daniel, when the terrible “handwriting” was seen upon the wall.t The Babylonians were a luxurious people. Their * So a great fox-hunter, who could not find it in his heart to leave England, is said to have turned his conservatory into a little Italy for his delicate wife. + The names of the Eastern kings are so variously given. 36 THE HISTORY OF HERODOTUS. full dress was a long linen tunic, with, a woollen robe over it, and a short white cloak or cape over the shoulder. Though they wore their hair long, they swathed their heads in turbans, and perfumed them¬ selves all over. Each citizen carried his walking- staff, carved at the top with the likeness of some natural object—such as an apple, a rose, a lily, or an eagle—and had also his private signet. Of these seals (which are hollow cylinders) great numbers have been found during the late explorations, and brought to Europe.* Herodotus records one of their customs, which, whe¬ ther in jest or earnest, he declares to he the wisest he ever heard of. This was their wife-auction, by which they managed to find husbands for all tlieir young women. The greatest beauty was put up first, and knocked down to the highest bidder; then the next in the order of comeliness—and so on to the damsel who was equidistant between beauty and plainness, who was given away gratis. Then the least plain was put up, and knocked down to the gallant who would marry her for the smallest consideration,—and so on till even the plain¬ est was got rid of to some cynical worthy who decidedly that it is almost impossible to identify them either in sacred or profane history. The Labynetus of Herodotus is Nabonidus, or Nabonadius, in other writers. The “Belshazzar” whom Daniel calls “king” was probably his son, associated with him in the government. His name appears in inscriptions as Bilshar-uzur. We know from other authorities that Labynetus himself was not in the city at its capture.—See Rawlinson’s Herodotus, i. 524, &c. * They are commonly of some composition, but occasionally have been found in amethyst, cornelian, agate, &c.—Bayard’s Nineveh and Babylon, 602, &c. CYRUS. 37 preferred lucre to looks. By transferring to the scale of the ill-favoured the prices paid for the fair, beauty was made to endow ugliness, and the rich man’s taste was the poor man’s gain. The Babylonian marriage-market might perhaps be advantageously adopted in some mo¬ dern countries where marriage is still made a commercial matter. It at least possesses the merit of honesty and openness, and tends to a fair distribution of the gifts of fortune. Another Babylonian custom, of which Herodotus strongly approves, was that of employing no profes¬ sional physicians, but placing the sick in the gate of the city, that they might get advice respecting the treatment of their diseases from every passer-by, and thus profit by the experience of those who had been afflicted in the same way as themselves. Whatever may be thought of the absence of regular practitioners, the alternative would certainly seem one of the excep¬ tional cases where wisdom is not found in a multitude of counsellors. Having annexed this great and rich province to his dominions, Cyrus seems to have been intoxicated with success, or, in our author’s view, to have filled up the measure of his prosperity, which now began to run over in insolent self-confidence. He made an expedition against the Massagetse or Greater Goths, who lived in the steppes near the Caspian Sea, and were ruled by an Amazonian widow named Tomyris. While en¬ camping against her, Cyrus dreamed that Darius, the son of Hystaspes, a young noble of the royal house of Persia, appeared to him with wings on his shoulders (like some of the Assyrian gods whose figures l*e must have seen), with one of which he overshadowed 58 THE HISTORY OF HERODOTUS. Asia and the other Europe. This portended liis fall, and the ultimate accession of Darius. At first he gained a partial advantage by the stratagem of leaving a camp stored with wine to he plundered by the water - drinking Massagetae, and then returning and massacring them in their sleep. This was the shrewd advice of Croesus the Lydian, whom Cyrus had taken with him on the expedition. Among the prisoners taken was the son of the Massagetan queen. Cyrus released him from his bonds at his own request; but the youth, unable to bear his disgrace, only took advan¬ tage of his liberty to kill himself. At length the invaders were forced to a general action—the fiercest, says Herodotus, ever fought between barbarian armies. The Persians were completely defeated, and Cyrus himself was slain, after a reign of twenty-nine years. Queen Tomyris, exasperated by the treacherous slaughter of her army and the death of her son, had threatened to give the bloodthirsty invader his fill of blood ; she kept her word by filling a skin with it, and plunging into it his severed head. Such is the account which Herodotus gives of the death of the great Eastern conqueror, so famous both in sacred and profane history. He confesses that he has only chosen one legend out of many. There is little doubt, however, that he died in battle. But the Persian poets assigned a very different fate to their national hero, Kai Khusru, as his name stands in their language. They will not allow that he died at all. When he grew old, they say, he one day took leave of his attendants on the banks of a pleasant stream, and was seen no more. But, as in the case of Arthur and Barbarossa, and all the great favourites of a nation, Cl ItU3. 39 they looked forward to liis coming again, more power¬ ful and glorious than ever. These Massagetae, says our author, resembled the Scythians, but could fight on foot as well as on horseback, their favourite weapon being, as with the Anglo-Saxons, a battle-axe or bill. They had the peculiar custom of sacrificing their old people, and then feasting on them, and natural death was con¬ sidered a misfortune. This curious people, whose descendants may be now in northern or western Eu¬ rope, knew nothing of tillage, and lived on flesh, fish, and milk. Their only deity, known to Herodotus, was the Sun. To him they sacrificed the horse, with the notion that it was right to bestow the swiftest of creatures on the swiftest of gods. The Persians also attached a certain sanctity to some breeds of horses, and the Teutonic conquerors of Britain bore a horse as their cognisance. Some say that Hengist and Horsa were not names of men, but only represented a people using this national symbol. This rude heraldry of our northern ancestors—or conquerors—may still be traced in the “White Horse ” cut out on the chalk- hills in more than one place on our Berkshire and Wiltshire downs. CHAPTER III EGYPT. u In the afternoon they came unto a land In which it seemed always afternoon.” —Tennyson, “ Lotos-Eaters.” Op all the nine boohs of Herodotus, the second, which hears the name of the Muse “ Euterpe,” is incomparably the one of deepest interest to the modern reader, as giving glimpses, such as are found nowhere else but in Scripture, of the infancy of the human race, and as propounding important scientific problems, which can, if ever, only find their solution in remote futurity. It is, moreover, the portion of his work which is most strongly stamped with the characteristics of the author’s personality. It must ever be borne in mind that Herod¬ otus is not a historian in the modern sense of the term. He is the representative writer of a class who stand mid¬ way between poetical annalists like Homer and critical historians like Thucydides. They wrote their Iliads in prose, making no sharp distinction between truth and fiction. They did not yet look upon the verifica¬ tion of their facts as a duty, but jotted down all that they heard and saw, an instinctive love of truth alone suggesting occasional scepticism as to very extraordinary EGYPT. 41 marvels, so that the modern reader may just observe the dawning of the critical spirit. Predominantly in his Egypt, Herodotus appears as the traveller and archaeologist; nor is he fairly afloat on the current of history until he launches himself into the narrative of the Persian invasions of Greece, of the circumstances of which he had more immediate knowledge—if not as an eyewitness, yet from those who had themselves been eyewitnesses. Egypt has been in all ages the land of wonders, from the time when its “magicians” found their en¬ chantments fail before the mightier Power which Avas with Moses, to that when Napoleon told his soldiers that from the top of the Pyramids four thousand years looked down on their struggle Avith the Mame¬ lukes,—and to our OAvn day, Avhen a French engineer repeats the feat of the old native kings and the Greek Ptolemies, in marrying by a canal the Eed Sea to the Mediterranean; an achievement Avhich Avill make the name of Lesseps immortal, if the canal can only be kept clear of sand. The civilisation of Egypt is older than time—or at least, than its records. Her kings Avere counted Avholesale—not by individuals, but by dynasties, of which there Avere said to have been thirty-one, exclusive of gods and heroes. She was the mother of the arts to Greece, as Greece has been to us. Her monuments are nearly as vast and as seemingly indestructible as the everlasting hills them¬ selves, and the study of her mere remnants seems to present a field as inexhaustible as that of nature. No Avonder that Herodotus Avillingly lingered in this in¬ teresting country. He Avas no holiday traveller, but one all ears and eyes, not likely to let any fact or 42 THE HISTORY OF HERODOTUS. object escape liim through carelessness or want of curiosity. The Egyptians were wont to boast that they were the oldest people in the world; but our author says that their king Psammetichus once put this to the proof, and decided against them. Two infants were kept carefully apart from human society, their attend¬ ants being forbidden to utter a word before them. Under these circumstances women as nurses were out of the question, and they were suckled by goats. [There was indeed a Greek version of the legend, Avliich said that the children were nursed by women— with their tongues cut out.] One day, when about two years old, they came to their keeper, stretching out their hands, and calling “Bekkos! bekkos!” This being Phrygian for “ bread,” the palm of antiquity was adjudged to the Phrygians. The test was scarcely trustworthy, for probably enough the cry was only an imitation of the bleat of the-goats. It has indeed been claimed by etymologists as the Sanscrit root “ pac” whence our word “ cook ” is said to be derived. The Germans, again, recognise in it their own “ bakken ” = bake.* According to the priests, who were Herodotus’s chief informants, the whole country except the district of Thebes, seven days’ sail up the Nile from the sea, was originally a swamp. To the truth of this our author was ready to testify, as the whole Delta (called so from the shape of the Greek letter A, our D) appeared to him to be “ the gift of the river.” This formation certainly required time, but he considered that the N ile was so * Englishmen have suggested that it may have been a feeble attempt to call for “breakfast." r EGYPT. 43 energetic, that in ten thousand years (which is, after all, a very moderate geological period) it might even deposit alluvial soil enough to fill up the Arabian gulf 9f the Ked Sea. The priests appear to have given nim very good data for supplementing his own obser¬ vations on the physical phenomena of the country; and in these details he evinces a patient investigation of facts which would do credit to any age, however scientific. He only becomes fanciful when he begins to speculate on the unknown. With respect to the causes of the annual inundations of the Nile, he could, naturally enough, get no trustworthy information. It struck him as particularly strange that the Nile, unlike other l ivers, should begin to rise with the summer solstice, and be in a state of flood for a hundred days afterwards. Certain Greeks who affected a reputation for science endeavoured to account for the phenomenon in three ways. The third, which appeared to Herodotus the least plausible explanation, was, that the Nile was swollen by melting snows, though it flows through the torrid land of the Ethiopians into Egypt—which seemed to him a contradiction. Yet this theory was so near the actual truth, that the inundations are caused by the summer rains in the highlands of Abyssinia and on the equa¬ torial table-land of Africa. That Herodotus had seen an inundation of the river is tolerably certain, from his description of the appearance of the country at such times. He speaks of the towns and villages standing out of the water “ like the islands in the AEgean Sea a graphic picture, of which modern travellers have recognised the truth. Adopting neither of the theories which had been advanced, Herodotus modestly pro¬ pounds one of his own, which is curious, but of no u THE HISTORY OF HERODOTUS. scientific value, as resting on false cosmographical data. As to the sources of the Nile, he says that he never met with but one person who professed to know anything about them. This was the registrar of the treasury of Minerva at Sa'is; but when he began to talk about two conical hills—“called Krophi and Mophi ”—between Syene and Elephantine (below the cataracts), Herodotus thought he could hardly bo quite serious. Between those hills, said his in¬ formant, lay the fountains of the Nile, of unfathom¬ able depth. Half the water ran to Egypt, the other half to Ethiopia. Psammetichus had tried to sound them with a rope many thousand fathoms in length, but there were such strong eddies in the water that the bottom of the spring could never be reached. Herodotus himself went up the Nile as far as Ele¬ phantine—that is, did not get beyond the first cata¬ ract ; and though he learnt much by inquiry as to the country generally, he could throw no additional light on the great question. But a story reached him originally derived from certain Nasamonians—a people inhabiting the edge of the desert—that once on a time certain “wild young men,” sons of their chiefs, took it into their heads to draw lots which of them should go and explore the desert of Libya, and try to get farther than any one had gone before. Eive of their number set out, well supplied with food and water, and passed first through the inhabited region, then through a country tenanted only by wild beasts, and then entered the desert, taking a direction from east to west. After proceeding for many days ovei a sandy waste, they came at last to a plain where EGYPT. 45 they found fruit-trees, and began to pluck the fruit. While they were doing so, certain very small men came upon them and took them prisoners. The Nas- amonians could not understand them, nor make themselves understood. They were led by them across vast marshes, and at last came to a town where all the inhabitants were black dwarfs like their cap- tors. A great river flowed by the town from west to east, abounding in crocodiles. And all the people in the town were wizards. It was added that the ex¬ plorers returned in safety from their perilous journey. If the Bushmen now surviving at the Cape, and formerly more extensively spread over Africa, were a black race, which they are not, we might suppose them to be the descendants of the little men spoken of by Herodotus. Their colour may, however, have been modified by the temperate climate of South Africa in the course of long ages. The tribe of Dokos, in the south-west of Abyssinia, are dwarfish, and answer very nearly to Herodotus’s description. Herodotus was inclined to identify the Nile with the river flowing by the mysterious city.* It is strange that the oldest geographical problem in the world should be a problem still, though now prob¬ ably in the course of solution. The nearest approach to the truth appears to have been made by the Alex¬ andrian geographer, Ptolemy, who had heard of cer¬ tain lakes as the sources of the Nile, and placed them some ten degrees south of the equator. The question elumbered through the middle ages, and one affluent after another was looked upon as the true Nile, till * It was more probably, as Mr Rawlinson and Mr Blakesley both think, the Niger, and the city may have been Timbuctoo. 40 THE HISTORY OF HERODOTUS. Bruce was for some time supposed to have set the question at rest in the eighteenth century, by the discovery of the source of the Blue River. Quite of late years it was agreed again that the White River was the main branch; and in 1857 Captain Speke, setting out from Zanzibar, discovered the Victoria Lake, whicli is now the farthest authenticated source in an easterly direction, while Sir Samuel Baker’s Albert Lake is the farthest authenticated source in a westerly. Up to this time Speke and his companion Major Grant are the only men who have actually crossed Africa from south-east to north, and as yet the honours of discovery must be supposed to rest with them. In treating of the wonders of Egypt, Herodotus certainly exaggerates on some points from love of paradox, as when he says that as the Uile differs from all other rivers in its nature, so the Egyptians differ from all other men in their habits, the men doing what is usually considered as women’s work, and the women men’s work; for in this he is refuted by the Egyptian paintings, which represent each sex as usually engaged in its proper occupation. But a Greek must have been much struck with the comparative freedom of the Egyptian women, so unlike the life of the Hellenic “ lady’s bower,” or the Asiatic harem. Sophocles, in his 1 CEdipus at Colonus,’ has made a beautiful application of this recorded contrast to the helpful piety of the daughters and the selfish luxury of the sons of the blind hero, which would seem to show that he wrote the play fresh from the perusal of his friend’s Egypt. Our author makes the observation that the Egyptians were the first nation who, holding the soul to be immor EGYP T. 47 tal, asserted its migration after deatli through the whole round of created beings, till it lived again in another man, which occupied a cycle of three thousand years. This doctrine of a “ circle of necessity ” was held alike by Buddhists, Druids, and—if Josephus may be trusted —by the sect of the Pharisees among the Jews. But this Egyptian doctrine, which is profusely illustrated on the tombs, suffered the wicked only to descend into animals, while the good passed at once into a state of hap¬ piness. A striking custom which Herodotus describes would seem to show that to them, as to the Greeks, the future existence was not a cheering prospect. “ In the social banquets of the rich, as soon as the feast is ended, a man carries round a wooden figure of a corpse in its coffin, graven and painted so as to re¬ semble the reality as nearly as possible, from one to two cubits long. And as he shows it to each of the guests, he says, “ Look on this, and drink, and be merry; for when thou art dead, such shalt thou be.” The “ skeleton at the banquet ” has pointed many a moral for ancient and modern writers. St Paul may have had it in mind when he quoted as the motto of the Sadducee, “Let us eat and drink, for to-morrow we die,” as well as Shakespeare, when he makes his Hamlet moralise over Yorick’s skull—“Now get you to my lady’s chamber, and tell her, let her paint an inch thick, to this favour she must come.” Herodotus considers that the names of the gods came to Greece from Egypt, with the exception of Poseidon (Neptune), Castor and Pollux, Here (Juno), Hestia, Themis, the Graces and the Nereids. All these the Greeks were said to have inherited from the Pelasgians, with the exception of the sea-god Post i 48 THE HISTORY OF HERODOTUS. cion, with whom they became acquainted through the Libyans. The Egyptians, unlike the Greeks, paid no honour to heroes or demigods; for their god Osiris (who corresponded to Bacchus) appeared on earth only as a manifestation or Avatar of Deity. Amongst the mythological marvels of the Egyptians, Herodotus relates that they accounted cows as sacred to Isis, the moon-goddess, represented with horns, and objected to kill them as food—a practice which finds its parallel in India at the present day. The sacredness of animals generally, in Egypt, struck our traveller forcibly. Eor each species there were certain appointed guardians, who tended and fed them, and the office was heredi¬ tary. To kill one of these sacred animals was a capital offence, unless done accidentally, in which case a fine was inflicted; but to kill an ibis or a hawk was death without reprieve. Cats were so much respected that, in case of a fire occurring, the Egyptians would let the house be burnt before their eyes, all their attention being given to saving the cats ; which, however, they usually found Impossible, as the animals (no doubt in terror at the well-meant efforts.of their friends) had a trick of jumping into the flames. If they died, never¬ theless, it was thought to be a terrible misfortune. When a cat died a natural death, all the inmates of a house went into mourning by shaving their eyebrows, and they shaved their heads and their whole bodies when a dog died. The dead cats were embalmed, and theii mummies stored in the sacred city of Bubastis; but the dogs were buried in their own cities, as were also the ichneumons. The hawks and shrew-mice were conveyed to Buto, and the ibises to Hermopolis. It would seem by this that the animals about whose EGYPT : 49 funerals so mucli trouble was taken were more sacred than the rest.* The crocodile, of which Herodotus gives a description, perhaps as fairly accurate as could he expected from an ordinary observer, was accounted sacred by some of the Egyptians ; for instance, by the people about Thebes, and those about Lake Mceris. I n each of these places a tame crocodile was kept, who v> ore ear-rings (or rather rings in the corresponding holes) of glass or gold, and bracelets on his fore-paws. Every day he had his ration of bread and meat, and when lie died he was buried in a consecrated vault. But the people of Elephantine, so far from canonising these animals, thought them tolerable eating. Herodotus gives a native receipt for catching croco¬ diles. Bait a hook with a chine of pork, and let it float to about the middle of the stream. Let a confed¬ erate hold a living pig on the bank, and belabour him lustily. The crocodile hears the pig squeak, and, mak¬ ing for him, encounters the pork, which he swallows. When the men on shore have drawn him to land, plug his eyes with mud; after that, it is very easy to kill him. This latter item of the receipt has a strong affinity to an old precept about “ putting salt on a bird’s tail.” A very similar mode of capture (with this exception) is practised by the natives now. The name “ crocodilos,” as the author observes, is Ionic Greek for “ lizardthe Egyptians themselves calling the animal “ champsa.” t He is somewhat mistaken in his * Lane says that the modern Egyptians are remarkably kind to animals. On one occasion a lady buried a favourite dog with all the honours due to a good Mussulman, and houseless cats are fed at the expense of the Cadi of the district. 1' Apparently an attempt to write the name msah, still to be A. c. voh iii. I> 50 THE HISTORY OF HERODOTUS. account of the hippopotamus, no specimen of which he appears to have seen. He gives it the hoof of an ox, and the mane and neigh of a horse. The sacred bird called the phoenix Herodotus confesses he never saw except in pictures. Indeed it was rare in Egypt, for it came hut once in five hundred years, when the old phoenix died. According to the pictures, it was like an eagle, with plumage partly red and partly golden. The bird was said to come from Arabia, bringing the body of his father enclosed in a ball of myrrh, that he might bury it in the temple of the Suu. Our author did not seem to be acquainted with that other version of the phoenix fable, according to which it returned from the east after a stated period to burn itself in frankincense, and was again resuscitated. The phoenix was an emblem of the soul and its sup¬ posed migrations, and its journey to the east typified the constant aspiration of the soul towards the sun. Its period of migration referred to a solar cycle in the Egyptian calendar. Pliny says that the name was derived from a species of palm in Lower Egypt, which dies down to the root and then is renovated. Ovid makes the bird build its nest on a palm. In hieroglyphic language the palm-bough is the sign of the year. Amongst other wonders, our author had heard of winged serpents, which flew across from Arabia, and w T as induced to undertake a journey to the country whence they came, where he says he saw some of their bones. The ibises were said to destroy them as they flew, w r hich caused this bird to be held in great honour by the Egyptians. We are now in possession of the traced in the Arabic temsah .—See Sir G. Wilkinson’s note, Rawlinson, ii. 110. EGYPT. probable key to tbis enigmatical story, which illustrates both the simple faith and painstaking of our author, and also the manner in which myths grow out of the use of words. When scorpions or snakes appear in large numbers in the houses in Upper Egypt, they are supposed to be brought by the wind, and to all such objects an Arabic word is applied which signifies to fly. Herodotus doubtless saw pictures of a winged ser¬ pent attacked by the ibis, but this bird typified the god Osiris in the white robes of his purity, and the winged serpent probably the Evil principle. The ibis, however, is said to destroy snakes. His mention of the harmless horned snakes at Thebes, which were considered sacred, and buried in the temple, may suggest the prolific subject of primeval serpent-worship. The description which Herodotus gives of the man¬ ners and customs of the Egyptians stamps them as a highly civilised people. In the reverence paid by young men to their elders, he considered that they set a good example to the Greeks. In the medical profession they recognised a minute division of labour, some being oculists, others dentists, and so forth.* Those who embalmed the dead (the “ physicians u of the book of Genesis) formed a profession of them¬ selves. He describes at length three methods of em¬ balming (they had really many more), which were adopted in order to suit the means of their customers, as modern undertakers provide for funerals at different tariffs. Amongst other local peculiarities, Herodotus notices the lotus-eaters of the marsh-lands, who re¬ mind us of those described by Homer in the voyage of * “0 virgin, daughter of Egypt, in vain shalt thou use mcuiy medicines.” —Jer. xlvi. fl. THE HISTORY OF HERODOTUS. Ulysses. But these latter—if tliey are to be identified at all—are to be recognised rather in the lotus-eating tribe whom our author mentions in a subsequent -book as existing on the coast of Africa. Their lotus was pro¬ bably a kind of jujube (Zlzt/pJius napeca). The Egyp¬ tian lotus was a kind of water-lily, the centre of whose blossom was dried, crushed, and eaten, as also its round root. The seeds of another water-lily, whose blossoms were like a rose, were also eaten, as well as the lower stems of the byblus or papyrus, whose leaves were used for paper and other purposes. The mosquitoes were as great a nuisance in Egypt formerly as now. Herodotus says that some of the natives, to avoid them, slept on towers exposed to the wind ; but in the marslijBS each man had a net, which served the double purpose of catching fish by day and acting as a mos¬ quito-curtain at night. For the early history of the country Herodotus had to depend upon his informants, who were usually the priests, especially those of Heliopolis — the Greek name by which he knew the oldest capital of Egypt, Ei-h-re, the On or Aon of the Hebrew Scriptures—the “City of the Sun.”* The college of priests there was in fact the university of Egypt; and whatever faith we may place in their historical records, their proficiency in mathematics and astronomy was very considerable indeed. They asserted that the first * The “ Aven ” of Ezek. xxx. 17; translated into the Hebrew B?th-shemesh—“ House of the Sun”—Jer. xliii. 13. The silt of the Nile has now covered most of its monuments and build ings, but its massive walls may still be traced, and a solitary granite obelisk, said to be near 4000 years old, marks what was the entrance to the temple of the Suu. EGYPT. 53 kings of Egypt were gods, “ who dwelt upon earth with men.” The last of this divine dynasty was Homs, son of Osiris—whom the Greeks identified with Apollo. The sufferings and death of Osiris were the great mystery of the Egyptian creed. Herodotus had seen his burial-place at Sais, and knew the mysterious rites with which, under cover of night, these sufferings were commemorated. But he “will by no means speak of them,” or even mention the god by name. Either the priests had enjoined secrecy upon him as the price of their information; or perhaps, being himself initiated in the Greek Mysteries, he had a scrupulous reverence for those of Egypt. Osiris was the great principle of Good, who slew his bro¬ ther Typhon, the representative of Evil; and is pic¬ tured in the hieroglyphic paintings as the great judge of the dead. The first king of human race was Men, or Menes, the founder of Memphis, who began a line of three hundred and thirty monarchs (including one queen), whose names were read off to Herodotus from a roll of papyrus. Eighteen were said to be Ethiopians. Of most of these kings the priests professed to know little more than the names; but Moeris, the last of them, left his name to a large artificial lake, or reser¬ voir, near the “ City of Crocodiles,” from which water was conveyed to all parts of the neighbourhood. His successor, Sesostris, is said to have conquered all Asia, and even to have subdued Scythia and Thrace, in Europe, marking the limits of his conquests by pillars —two of which, in Palestine, Herodotus declares that he himself saw.* Sesostris, after his return from his * There is little doubt that these are the tablets still to ba seen near Beyrout. THE HISTORY OF HERODOTUS. 5t conquests, n;et with somewhat too warm a welcome from his brother, whom lie had left viceroy of Egypt, lie invited the hero and his family to a banquet, heaped wood all round the building, and set fire to it. Sesostris only escaped by sacrificing (by the mother’s advice) two of his six sons, whose bodies he used to bridge the circle of flame. Having inflicted condign punishment on his brother, he then proceeded to utilise the vast multitudes of captives whom he had brought with him. By the employment of this forced labour he changed the face of Egypt, completely intersecting it with canals, and filling it with public buildings of un¬ paralleled magnificence. The second king after Sesos¬ tris bore a Greek name, but must be regarded as a very apocryphal personage—Proteus, who was said to have entertained at his court no less famous a visitor than Helen, the heroine of the Trojan war. For the Egyptian priests had their version, too, of that wondrous Tale. According to them, the Spartan princess was driven by stress of weather do Egypt on her forced elopement with Paris, while Troy was besieged by the Greeks, in the belief that she was there. King Proteus, when lie heard the story, gave Helen refuge, but dismissed Paris at once with disgrace. Herodotus accuses Homer of knowing this legend, which was a more probable version of the story than his own, and suppressing it for poetical purposes, since he speaks of the long wan¬ derings of Helen, and of Menelaus’s visit to Egypt. The priests told him that their predecessors had the story from Menelaus himself, who went to Egypt to fetch Helen, when he found, after the capture of Troy, that she was not there. Herodotus himself saw in the sacred precincts at Men phis a temple to “ Venus the EGYPT. 55 Foreigner,” whom his Greek patriotism at once iden¬ tified with Helen. A story told at considerable length by Herodotus of the next king, Rhampsinitus, is highly characteristic, showing that sympathy of the Greek mind for clever rascality which recalls Homer’s manifest enjoyment of the wily tricks of Ulysses in the ‘ Odyssey.’ The story of “The Treasury of Rhampsinitus,” which has been borrowed also by the Italian novelists, reads as if it were taken from the ‘ Arabian Nights.’ King Rhampsinitus, having vast treasure of silver, built for its safe keeping a chamber of hewn stone, one of whose walls formed also the outer wall of his palace. His architect, however, having designs on the treasure, built a stone into the wall, which even one man who knew the secret could easily displace. He did not live long enough to carry out his views, but on his deathbed explained the contrivance to his two sons, for whose sake, he said, he had devised it, that they might live as rich men, since the secret would make them virtual chancellors of the royal exchequer through their lives. After his death, the sons profited by his instruc¬ tions to remove a considerable sum. The king, when next he came to visit the room, missed his money, finding it standing at a lower level in the vessels. This hap¬ pened again and again, though the seals and fastenings of the room were as secure as ever. At last he set a man-trap inside. When the thieves next made their usual visit, one of them found himself suddenly caught. Seeing no hope of escape, he called to his brother to come and cut off his head, to prevent his being recognised. The brother obeyed ; and, after replacing the stone, made his way home with the head. When the king 56 THE HISTORY OF HERODOTUS. entered at day-break, lie greatly marvelled to see a head¬ less trunk in the gin, while the building seemed still to be fast closed all round. To find out to whom the body belonged, he ordered it to be hung outside the palace-wall, and set a guard to watch, and bring before him any persons they might observe lamenting over it The mother of the dead man, hearing of this desecra¬ tion of a corpse that should have been a mummy, told her surviving son that -unless he contrived to rescue it, she would go and tell the king that he was the robber. Wearied with her continual reproaches, at last the brother filled some skins with wine, loaded them on asses, and drove them by tho place where the guards were watching the dead body Then he slily untied the necks of some of the skins. The wine of course began to run out, upon which he fed to wailing and beating his head, as if distracted, and not knowing to which donkey he should run first to stanch the wine. This highly amused the guards, who ran eagerly to catch the wine in all the vessels they could lay hands on. Then the driver pretended to get into a passion, and abused them, upon which they did their best to quiet him. At last, appearing to be put in good-humour again by their raillery, he gave them one of the skins to drink. They invited him to help them with the drinking, as they had helped him in putting the skins in order. As the wine went round, all got more and more friendly, till they broached another skin, and at last the guards all got so drunk that they went to sleep on the spot. In the dead of the night the thief took down the body of his brother, laid it upon the asses, and made off, having first remained long enough to shave off the right whiskers of each of the men*- EGYPT. 57 which was considered a deadly insult. When the king heard of this, he was more vexed than ever, and determined to find out the thief at any cost. He hade his daughter keep open house for all comers, and pro¬ mise to marry the man who would tell her most tc her satisfaction the cleverest and wickedest thing he had ever done. If any one told her the story of the robbery, she was to lay hold of him. But the thiei was not to be thus outwitted.. He procured a dead man’s arm, put it under his dress, and went to call on the princess. When she put the question, he answered at once that the wickedest thing he had ever done was cutting off his brother’s head in the king’s treasury, and the cleverest was making the guards drunk, and carrying off’ his body. The princess made a grasp at him, but in the darkness he left the arm of the corpse in her hand and fled. But now the king was over¬ whelmed with astonishment and admiration for the man’s cleverness, and made a proclamation of free pardon and a rich reward, if the thief would declare himself. He boldly came forward, and Bhampsinitus gave him his daughter in marriage. “ The Egyptians,” he said, “ are the wisest of men, and thou art the wisest of the Egyptians.” Till the death of Bhampsinitus, Egypt enjoyed pro¬ sperity. Cheops, who succeeded him, and who built the Great Pyramid, is said to have shut up all the tem¬ ples, that his people might do nothing but work for him; and he kept a hundred thousand labouring at a time, who were relieved every three months. It took ten years to make the causeway (of which traces still remain) for the conveyance of stones, and another twenty to build the Pyramid itself. The next kings, 5S THE HISTORY OF HERODOTUS. Chephren and Mycerinus (Mencheres), likewise built j)yramids, but on a smaller scale. The memory of Cheops and Chephren, in consequence of their oppres¬ sions, became so odious to the Egyptians, that they would not even mention their names; but upon My¬ cerinus, though he was just and merciful, there fell the punishment due for their sins. First he lost his only daughter, and then an oracle told him that he had but six years to live. He expostulated with the oracle, saying it was hard that he who was a good and righteous king should die early, while his father and uncle, who were so impious, lived long. The oracle answered—“ For that verv reason thou must die, for Egypt was destined to suffer ill for one hundred and fifty years, and thou hinderest the doom from being fulfilled.” On this Mycerinus, finding it useless to be virtuous, determined to outwit the gods; so he lighted lamps at nightfall, and turned all the nights into days, and enjoyed them, as well as the days, in feasting in all pleasant places. Thus he lived twelve years in the space of six, making his six years one long day of continuous revel. The story of Mycerinus has been very happily treated in one of Matthew Arnold’s earliest poems.* “ I will unfold my sentence and my crime ; My crime, that rapt in reverential awe, I sate obedient, in the fiery prime Of youth, self-governed, at the feet of Law, Ennobling this dull pomp, the life of kings, With contemplation of diviner things. * Its moral—if it has any—may be found in Moore’s song, “ And the best of all ways To lengthen our days, Is to steal a few hours from the night, my dear.” EGYPT. 59 ut when he saw one of his former boon companions, an old man now reduced to beggary, asking alms from the soldiers, then his grief broke forth in tears, and he beat himself on the head. Cambyses was amazed that he should weep at the fate of his friend, and not at that of his daughter or son, and sent to ask him the reason of his strange conduct. Psammenitus answered, “ 0 son of Cyrus, mine own misfortunes were too great for tears.” Cambyses was sufficiently touched to order the life of the young prince to be spared, but the reprieve came too late. But from that time Psammenitus was treated better, and might, as Herodotus thinks, had he shown more tact, have been appointed governor of Egypt, since it was the Persian custom thus to honour fallen princes, even giving the kingdoms of rebel vassals to their sons.* But he was unwise enough to plot rebel- * "We have notable instances of this habit in Eastern mon- archs recorded in Scripture. Jehoiakim is made king instead of his brother Jehoahaz, by Pharaoh-Nechoh (2 Kings xxiii. 34) ; Mattaniah instead of his nephew Jehoiachin, by Nebuchadnezzar (2 Kings xxiv. 17). 68 THE HISTORY OF HERODOTUS. lion, and Cambyses, discovering this, put him to death. And now the son of Cyrus entered on that career of impiety which was certain to have an evil end. He had the body of his enemy Amasis, who had escaped his vengeance while living, torn from its tomb, scourged, and committed to the flames — an act horrible to the Persians, who worshipped fire; horrible to the Egyptians, who looked upon that element as a devour¬ ing monster to whom it was impious to give their dead. Then, according to Greek poetical justice, he was seized by infatuation. He planned wild expeditions ■—one against “ the Long-lived ” Ethiopians, who dwelt far away to the south, and who might perhaps be iden¬ tified with the modern Abyssinians (Heeren thinks, with the Somalis) by certain characteristics,- such as tall stature, regular though black features, and a great love of animal food. Whoever they were, they are the subject of one of our author’s most characteristic narra¬ tives. Cambyses sent envoys to them—men of the tribe of “ Eish - eaters,” who knew their language — with presents for their king; a purple robe, a collar and armlets of gold, and a cask of palm-wine, tokens of his goodwill, as “the things in which he himself most delighted.” The Ethiopian king—who was elected for his stature and beauty — made answer almost in the words of Joseph to his brethren : “ Surely to search out the land are ye come hither.” He asked how the purple robe was made; and when they explained the mystery of the dye, he said that the Persians’ garments, like themselves, were deceitful. When told the purpose of the golden collar and armlets, he chose to consider them as fetters, and remarked that Cu.m BYSES. 60 “ tlie Ethiopians made them stronger.” In fact, as Herodotus declares, the envoys saw men afterwards in prison actually wearing fetters of a metal which was there so plentiful. Only the wine he highly approved of, and asked what the king of Persia ate, and how long men lived in that country. When he heard that com was the staple food, and that it grew out of the earth, and that eighty years was considered a long life, he replied that he did not wonder at the king’s dying so young if he “ate dirt,” and that nothing, he was persuaded, could keep him alive even so long, except that excellent liquor. He sent hack in return an unstrung bow, with advice that, when the Persians could find a man to bend it, they should then think of attacking the “Long-livers.” Against this distant tribe, however, the Persian king set out with a vast army, without bestowing a thought on his commissariat. Before he had accomplished a fifth of the distance the provisions failed, but he still pushed on. The army fed on the sumpter-beasts till they were exhausted ; then on herbs and grass, till they came to the sandy desert, where vegetation ended. At last, when he heard of cannibalism in the ranks, Cambvses thought it was time to return : but he succeeded in bringing back only a small remnant of his host. Another expedition, sent against the temple of Ammon, in the great Oasis, fared even worse, for no news came of it more. It perished, our author thinks, in a sandstorm—more probably from want of water. But Cambyses’ heart was hardened. When he returned from his ill-starred march, he found the Egyptians holding high festival. This greatly incensed him, for he thought they were rejoicing at 70 THE HISTORY OF HERODOTUS. his defeat. But they were innocently celebrating the incarnation of their national god Apis or Epaphus, who was said to appear from time to time in the simili¬ tude “of a calf that eateth hay/’ and whose “avatar” in that form was denoted by certain sacred marks known to his priests. Cambyses was still more angry when he heard the real cause of this national jubilee : he had the priests scourged all round, forbade the people to rejoice on pain of death, and, to crown all, fell on the sacred beast and wounded him with his dagger, so that he pined away and died. From this precise date, as the Egyptians averred, the madness of Cambyses took a more decided char¬ acter. But his acts, however unaccountable to a Greek mind, seem to have been little more than those of an Eastern despot of fierce passions and naturally cruel disposition. First he had his brother Smerdis put to death, and then he killed his sister because she mourned for Smerdis. He had sent this brother back to Persia because he excited his jealousy by being the only Persian who could just move the Ethiopian’s bow; and then, having dreamed that he saw Smerdis sitting on his throne and touching heaven with his head, he sent a nobleman named Prexaspes to Susa, who slew him according to his instructions. The story of the murder of the sister was differently told by the Persians and Egyptians. The former said that Cambyses, in the presence of his sister, had set a puppy to fight a lion-cub. The dog was getting the worst of it, when another of the same litter broke the cord that tied him, and came “to help his brother,” and both of them together mastered the young lion. Cambyses was amused, but his sister wept, ami said that she could not but think of Smerdis, who had no brother CA MB YSES. 71 to help him. For this speech he killed her. The Egyp¬ tians said that the pair were seated at table, when the sister took a lettuce, and, stripping its leaves off, asked Camhyses whether it looked better with its leaves off or on 1 He answered, “ With its leaves on.” “ Then why,” said she, “ didst thou strip of its leaves the stem of Cyrus ? ” A furious lack which followed this remark was the cause of her death. In fact, Camhyses had now become dangerous to all about him. Croesus, whom he had brought with him to Egypt, had more than one narrow escape. On one occasion officers were sent to put him to death, but they, knowing their master’s moods, only pretended to have done it, and produced Croesus alive as soon as Camhyses was heard to regret the order. He was well pleased that his friend had not been killed, but the disobedience cost the guards their lives. Another time he shot the son of Prexaspes through the heart to prove the steadiness of his hand, merely because the father had told him, in answer to a •question, that the Persians said he was rather too fond of wine. Probably for some similar offensive remark he buried up to their necks twelve of his nobles—a cruel process still practised in the East under the name of “ tree-planting.” * And he grew more and more profane. He opened tombs and unrolled mummies like a modern * “ Feti- Ali-Shah once sent for Astra-chan, one of liis cour¬ tiers, and with an appearance of great friendship took him round his garden, showing him all its beauties. When he had finished the circuit, he appealed to Astra-chan to know ‘ what his garden still lacked?’ ‘Nothing,’ said the courtier; ‘it is quite perfect.’ ‘I think differently,’ replied the king; ‘I must decidedly plant a tree in it.’ Astra-chan, who knew the king’s meaniug only top well, fell at his feet and begged his life, which he obtained only at the price of surrendering to the king the lady to whom lie was betrothed.”—Rawlinson, ii. 361, note. 72 THE HISTORY OF HERODOTUS. virtuoso. He made sport of the pigmy images of Pthah, or Vulcan, whose ludicrous ugliness must have presented the grim humorist with an irresistible temptation,* and other sacred idols he burnt. Herodotus expresses him¬ self much shocked at all this; but he might have known that the Persians were in general iconoclasts. It is possible that Cambyses was inspired with the same destructive zeal which induced the more modern Puritans to clear away the saints from the niches of our cathedrals. But as a Greek, our author would sympathise with the Egyptians. It is hard for us to judge how far some of the cruelties reported of Cam¬ byses may have been the invention of the outraged priests. He has recorded, in another part of his work, an anecdote which illustrates at once the character of Cambyses and the general incorruptibility of the royal judges of Persia. One of these, named Sisamnes, was found to have accepted bribes. Cambyses, with the facetious cruelty so common to tyrants of his type, had him flayed, and his skin stretched over the seat' which he had occupied while administering the law. He then appointed his son to the vacant post, charging him at the same time never to forget “ on what kind of cushion he was sitting/’ The modern reader will agree with Herodotus that it is at least right to treat with delicacy the peculiai usages of others. Aristotle quotes one of his anecdotes to illustrate the opinion of those who held that, all right and wrong were conventional. King Darius Hystaspes called certain Greeks into his presence, and asked them what they would take to eat their dead fathers'? They said that they would do it foi * See the woodcuts and note, Rawlinson, ii. 434- CA MBYSES. 73 no consideration whatever. Then he ashed a certain tribe of Indians what they would take not to eat the bodies of their fathers, but to burn them like the Greeks'? They cried aloud, and begged him not to blaspheme. So Sir John Lubbock, in his £ Prehistoric Times/ relates that the Tahitians think it indecent to dine in company; and that as soon as a child is born he is accounted the head of his family, and takes precedence of his father. And the tyranny of public opinion in matters indifferent, of which we complain so often, finds its strongest exemplification among the semi-brutal savages of Australia. The death of Smerdis had come to the knowledge of but few persons in Persia, and while Cambyses was absent in Egypt, tbe priest-caste of the Magi made a bold attempt at a revolution. It is probable that under Cyrus and Cambyses this caste, with their peculiar tenets, had been discouraged. A certain Magian, who was a kind of groom of the palace, had a brother who resembled greatly the dead Smer¬ dis, and who (according to Herodotus) bore the same name.* Patizethes seated this brother on the throne, and sent out a proclamation that henceforth all men were to do homage to Smerdis the son of Cyrus, and no longer to Cambyses. When Cambyses heard of this, he thought that Prexaspes had not done his errand, and that it was really his brother Smerdis who had revolted against him; but Prexaspes satisfied him that his orders had been duly executed, and that this * The Beliistun inscription gives the name as Gomates, and does not speak of two brothers. Mr Rawlinson seems to prove dearly that the revolution was a religious one, though nothing to that effect appears in Herodotus.—See his Essay, iii. 548. 74 THE HISTORY OF HERODOTUS. was a usurper personating the dead prince. He was at once struck by remorse, seeing that his fratricide had been useless, for his dream was so far fulfilled that a man called Smerdis sat on his throne; and he prepared to march at once in person to Susa to quell the rebellion. As he was mounting his horse, the knob of his sword sheath fell off, and the bare point of the weapon pierced his thigh, exactly as he had pierced with his dagger the god Apis. His wound brought him to his senses, and he solemnly conjured the Persian nobles to prevent the empire from pass¬ ing to the Medes, confessing that he had killed his brother Smerdis, and that therefore the present occu¬ pant of the throne must be an impostor. The wound¬ ed limb soon mortified, and Cambyses died in Egypt, leaving no issue. Before his death, lie asked the name of the village where he lav. He was answered that it was called “ Ecbatana.” Then he knew that he should die; for an oracle had long ago predicted that he should die at Ecbatana,—which he naturally took to be his own town in Media. The coincidence with the death of our own Henry IY. in the “Jerusalem chamber” is very curious. “ It hath been prophesied to me many years I should not die but in Jerusalem, Which vainly I supposed the Holy Land ;— But bear me to that chamber ; there I’ll lie,— In that Jerusalem shall Harry die.”* * ‘ Henry IV.,’ Part 2, Act iv. sc. 4 . CHAPTER V DARIUS. “ In tlie theatre of the World The people are actors all. One doth the sovereign monarch play ; And him the rest obey.”—C alderon. The jealous hatred which Cambyses bore to his brother Smerdis was so well known, that the Persians did not believe his dying declaration that the person who had seized his throne was an impostor. They accepted him as the true Smerdis, son of Cyrus. Such impostures are possible enough in a credulous age. A false Demetrius plays an important part in the history of Russia. There were many who disbelieved the fact jf the two English princes having been smothered in the Tower; and many more, at quite a recent date, have believed that Louis XVII. escaped his jailers, and grew up to manhood. The secluded life of an Eastern monarch would give such an imposture addi¬ tional chances of success. The Magian usurper reigned for eight months under the name of Smerdis, giving great satisfaction to most of his subjects, for under him “ the empire was peace.” He remitted the heaviest taxes, and enforced no raili- 76 THE HISTORY OF HERODOTUS. tary conscription. At last his imposture came to light. Otanes, a Persian nobleman, whose daughter was one of his wives, was informed by her that her husband had no ears. Now the Magian was known to have lost, his for some offence in the time of Cyrus.* The result of this revelation was, that Otanes headed the famous conspiracy of the seven nobles, of whom Darius, the son of Hystaspes, sprung from a collateral branch of the royal family, and probably the next legal heir, was one. While they were concocting their plan of attack, a tragical event happened which made immediate action necessary. The Magians, knowing how cruelly Prex- aspes had been treated by Cambyses,+ thought it their interest to conciliate him, and prevailed upon him to mount on a tower of the palace-wall, and make a speech to the people below, who had grown suspicious, to the effect that their present king was the true Smer- dis, the son of Cyrus. But in this they made as fatal a mistake as Shakespeare’s Brutus and Cassius did when they allowed Mark Antony to speak at Caesar’s funeral. Prexaspes, instead of lying to please the Magians, pro¬ claimed aloud the real state of the case, and then threw himself from the tower, and was killed on the spot. * This is the mildest form of mutilation, as the feature seems more ornamental than useful, except to those savage tribes in whom the muscle that moves the ear is developed. It was prac¬ tised in England as late as the seventeenth century, for such offences as Nonconformity, Petty Treason, Libel, and the like. Prynne is a well-known instance. It is common now in Africa, and is said to give the head the look of a barber’s block, but to be attended with no great inconvenience. The False Smerdis, as has been said, never went abroad, and probably wore his turban low on his head. *t* See p. 71. DARIUS. 77 The seven conspirators gained the presence of the false king and his brother with no great difficulty, but within they met with such resistance that two were badly wounded before they succeeded in despatching them. The others cut off the Magians’ heads, carried them forth, and showed them to the populace. A gen¬ eral massacre of the Magian caste followed, which lasted till the night. Few of them survived this St Bartho¬ lomew of Susa. During the annual festival held hence¬ forth under the name of Magophonia, which we might call the “ Median Vespers,” none of the hated class dared be seen abroad, though tolerated at other times. The seven noblemen, according to Herodotus, now resolved themselves into a debating societv, for the purpose of discussing different forms of government. That is to say, he here avails himself of an author’s favourite licence to propound theories of his own. His sympathies are plainly with democracy, but his¬ torical exigencies obliged him to admit that mon¬ archy was adopted. They agreed that one of the seven should be king, and the rest his peers, having free access to the royal presence on all but certain stated occasions. It was then arranged that all should ride their horses to an open place at sunrise, and choose as king the man whose horse was the first to neigh. This was really an appeal to the Sun, to whom the horse was sacred. The omen fell to Darius, by the cunning management of his equerry, and he was at once hailed as king. When he was established in tin* kingdom, he is said to have set up the figure of a man on horseback, with a commemorative inscription. The story may have been invented subsequently, to account for this work of art, as often happens. 78 THE HISTORY OF HERODOTUS. Most valuable light lias been thrown on the history of Darius by the discovery of the great Behistun in* scription. On the western frontier of the ancient Media there is a precipitous rock 1700 feet high, which forms a portion of the Zagros chain, separ¬ ating the table-land of Iran from the valley of the Tigris and Euphrates. The inscription can oidy bo reached with difficultv, as it is 300 feet from the base of the rock. It is in three languages, — old Persian, Babylonian, and Scythian,—executed, accord¬ ing to Sir H. Bawlinson, in the fifth year of Darius, B.c. 516. The wedge-shaped letters of the Persian copy were deciphered with infinite pains by this great archaeologist. Darius mentions in it, under the name of Gaumata, a Magian who personated Bardes * (as lie- calls him), the son of Cyrus, and says that he slew him by the help of Ormuzd, the Good Spirit, and thus recovered an empire that belonged to his own family, restoring to the Persians the religion which they had lost by the Magian intrusion. He also records that after this he was engaged in quelling a general revolt of the provinces. The main facts accord with those of Herodotus, though there is some difference in the no¬ menclature. The end of the inscription invokes a curse on any one who might injure it, and this has probably tended to preserve it; just as the curse on Shakespeare’s monument, at Stratford-on-Avon, may have conduced * The s, whether at the beginning or end of Persian names, is commonly only a Greek addition. So Bardy(a)—the vowel being pronounced though not written—is &merdis, Gaumat(a) becomes Gomates, Vashtasp(a) Hystaspes, Sec .—See Bawlinson, I. 27-29, note. DARIUS. 79 to prevent officious veneration from “ moving his bones.” Darius was the first monarch of Persia who regulated the revenues, and assigned the sum that each satrapy- ought to pay to the. royal treasury. This caused the haughty Persian aristocracy to say of him, in their con¬ tempt for red tape, that Cyrus had been a father to the state, Cambyses a master, but Darius was “ a huckster, who would make a gain of everything.” There can be no question that Herodotus had access, either personally or through friends, to the royal records of Persia, or copies of them. He gives a com¬ plete list of the various satrapies into which the empire was divided, of the several subject nations which it comprised, and the form and amount of their tribute. The Persians themselves, it must be remarked, like the Magyar grandees in Hungary formerly, were exempt from taxation, and only bound to military ser¬ vice. He says that the Indians, the most numerous race of all, paid into the royal treasury three hundred and sixty talents in gold dust, and that the whole an¬ nual revenue was computed at fourteen thousand five hundred and sixty talents, besides a fraction—more than three millions and a half of our money. Put it must be considered that this corresponds to the modern Civil List, serving only to defray the expenses of the Court. These Indians must not be supposed to be those of the Peninsula, but rather those, of Scinde and the Punjab. The gold which they brought into the royal treasury was said to come from a great desert to the eastward. In this desert there were ants—“ bigger than foxes ”—and in their hills the gold was found. To procure it the gold-hunters took camels, chiefly 80 THE HISTORY OF HERODOTUS . females with young ones, with which they proceeded to the 'place at the hottest time of day, when the ants were in their holes, filled their bags with the aurif¬ erous sand, and then hurried back to escape the pur¬ suit of the ants; the female camels leading the way, as anxious to get back to their young ones. The exist ence of these gigantic ants has been asserted by com¬ paratively modern travellers, but it seems probable that they must have been really ant-eaters, which burrowed in the hills, and which some informants of Herodotus may have seen. Amongst the barbarian tribes in dependence on Per¬ sia, he mentions one called the Padaeans, who, like the Massagetae before mentioned, allowed none of their sick to die a natural death. The horrible story is quaintly told. “ If a man is taken ill, the men put him to death to prevent his flesh being spoiled by his malady. He protests loudly that he never felt better in his life ; but they kill and eat him notwithstanding. So, if a woman is ill, the women who are her friends do to her in like manner. (The decent division of the sexes is worth re¬ marking.) If any one reaches old age—a very uncom¬ mon occurrence, for he can only do so on condition of never having been ill—they sacrifice him to the gods, and afterwards eat him.” Marco Polo, the Venetian traveller, writing about 1500, found the practice existing in Sumatra, where the relations as¬ sembled in the sick man’s house, suffocated him, and then ate him, as he describes it, “ in a convivial manner.” Among other wonders he mentions Arabian sheep (the forefathers, no doubt, of our “ Cape ” breed) which had tails three cubits long, for which the shep¬ herds made little trucks to keep them off’ the ground DARIUS. 81 — M eacli sheep having a truck of his own.” The mention of remarkable countries and productions leads Herodotus to observe that, while the Greeks have the finest climate, as inhabiting the middle of the earth, yet the farthest inhabited regions have the finest productions — tin, amber, and gold coming, for instance, from the ends of the earth; but in respect of horses he gives the palm to the Nissean breed of Media. Palgrave, in his Travels in Arabia, speaks of the horses of Nedjid as the “cream of the cream” of equine aristocracy. Soon after the accession of Darius, one of his seven fellow-conspirators, Intaphernes, got into trouble. lie insisted on seeing the king during his hours of privacy, and being denied, cut off the noses and ears of two of the palace officials, and hung them round their necks. This displeased the king so much that he condemned Intaphernes and all the males of his family to death. Hut Darius was touched with pity by the lamentations of the wife of Intaphernes, and allowed her to choose which of her family she would save. She chose her brother — explaining, when the king showed some astonishment at her selection, that such a loss could not possibly be replaced, her father and mother being dead. Pleased with her wit, Darius gave her the life of her eldest son into the bargain. Sophocles adopts the same curious sentiment in his tragedy of Antigone. The general justice of Darius would lead to the suspi¬ cion that the crime of Intaphernes was of the nature of high treason, otherwise his family would hardly have been involved in his punishment. The story of Democedes, a famous surgeon of Cro- tona, who was brought to Persia as a slave, is intro- a. c. vol. iii. v , 82 THE HISTORY OF HERODOTUS. duced by Herodotus to find a motive for the attention of the king being called to Greece. He had abundant reasons besides, as the history shows ; hut our author will not desert the theory of his choice, that Woman is the mainspring in all human affairs. Democedes had got into favour at court by successful treatment first of Darius himself, then of Atossa the favourite sultana. Dor this latter service he obtained leave to name his own reward,—it was, to be allowed to visit his home ; and, as Darius wished also to conquer Greece, in order that Atossa’s desire of having some of “ those Lacedaemonian handmaidens of whom she had heard so much ” might he gratified, Democedes was sent to make the tour of Greece and its colonies on the Italian coast with a party of spies. When he reached his native Crotona, he chose to remain there, and was assisted by his fellow-townsmen against the Persians who tried to take him hack with them. He hade the latter tell Darius that he was about to he married to the daughter of Milo the wrestler; wishing the king to know that he was a man of some mark in his own country, where—as in some cases amongst us moderns—athletics ranked even higher than science. These spies were said to have been the first Persians who visited Greece. But Darius had no time to think of Greece just then, as his hands were full with a revolt in Baby¬ lonia and other provinces, which appears to have assumed larger proportions than those known to Herodotus. Samos was the first state which was un¬ fortunate enough to draw upon itself the might of the Persian arms. The cause of this war was a cloak. When Cambyses was in Egypt with his army, one DARIUS. 83 Syloson, brother of Polycrates of Samos, was also there in exile. He appeared one day at Memphis in a scarlet cloak, to which Darius, who was then a plain officer of the royal guards, took a fancy, and asked the wearer to name his price. Syloson, in a fit of gene¬ rosity, begged him to accept it as a present; and it had no sooner been accepted than he repented of his good-nature. As matters turned out, the cloak of Syloson became as famous as that of Sir Walter Raleigh. Raleigh “ spoilt a cloak and made a for¬ tune,” by spreading out his for Queen Elizabeth to walk on; Syloson, by giving his away, led the way to the ruin of his country. Eor when Darius came to the throne, Syloson introduced himself at court as the hero of the cloak, and Darius asked him what he could do for him in return. He requested to be put in possession of his late brother’s dominion in Samos. Moeandrius, the secretary of Polycrates, who was at present in possession, was a man who had had great¬ ness thrust upon him. When Polycrates was murdered, the secretary found himself in possession of Samos; and wishing to be “ the justest of men,” set up an altar to the god of Freedom, stipulating only that he should be appointed its high priest as a condition of his establish¬ ing democracy. Finding, however, that the “ Irre- concilables ” of the period intended to prosecute him for embezzlement, he had repented of his republican generosity, and made himself master of the citadel and city. Darius now sent out an expedition which put his friend Syloson in possession of the island, but not without an insurrection,' which led to a terrible mas¬ sacre of the people. Babylon, according to the Beliistun inscription, ro 84 THE HISTORY OF HERODOTUS. volted from Darius twice—once in the first and again in the fourth year of his reign. It is difficult to iden¬ tify with either of these occasions the revolt now «/ mentioned by Herodotus. According to his account, —which in this instance must be regarded rather as romance than history—so determined was the attempt, t hat the Babylonians strangled most of their women, in order to reduce their population, in preparation for the expected siege. Darius soon sat down before the city, but the walls defied his utmost power; and the besieged began to jeer the Persians, telling them that “ they would never take the city until mules foaled.” However, in the twentieth month of the siege, a mule belonging to Zopyrus, a Persian of rank, did foal—an event perhaps not physically impossible; md Zopyrus thought that there must have been something providential in the taunt of the Baby¬ lonians, and that now the city might be taken. The sequel, whether true or not in an historical sense, is singularly illustrative of the chivalrous self-devotion of the Persian nobility in the interests of their mon¬ arch. Zopyrus proceeded to cut off his own nose and ears, dipt his hair close, got himself scourged, and in that state presented himself to Darius, and laid his plan before him.* Darius was greatly shocked at his retainer’s maltreatment of himself, but as it was too late to mend the matter, made the proposed arrange¬ ment. Zopyrus was to pretend to desert to the Baby¬ lonians, telling them that Darius had so ill-used him because he had advised him to raise the siege. The Babylonians would probably believe him, and intrust * The town of Gabii, according to Livy, was taken by the Romans by a very similar stratagem. DA RIUS. 85 liim with the command of a division. Darius must then he willing to sacrifice a few thousands of his worst soldiers to give the Babylonians confidence in Zopyrus, who, when he had the game safe in his hands, would open the gates to the Persian army. All turned out according to the programme. Zopyrus admitted the Persians, who took the city. Darius did his best to destroy the formidable walls, and had three thou¬ sand of the leading rebels impaled ; but not wish¬ ing to depopulate the city, procured from the neigh¬ bouring nations fifty thousand women to make up for those whom the Babylonians had sacrificed. As for Zopyrus, the king loaded him with honours and made him governor of Babylon; but he was wont to say,— more scrupulous than Henry IY. of France, who changed his religion to procure the surrender of the capital, thinking Paris “ well worth a mass,”—that he would rather have Zopyrus mmmtilated than be master of twenty Baby Ions. CHAPTER VL ■' • SCYTHIA. “ They dwell Tn wattled slieds on rolling cars alo Accoutred with far-striking archer} — ^Eschylus, “ Prometheus,” Haying disposed of Babylon, Darius next bethought himself of the Scythians. He had an old national grudge against this restless race, for having overrun Asia in the days of Cyaxares the Mede. The Behistun inscription only mentions the quelling of a revolt of the Sacse, or Scythian subjects of Persia; but Hero¬ dotus speaks of an expedition on a vast scale against the independent nation. The Scythians were, according to Herodotus, a people whose seat was in the steppes of northern Russia, more widely spread than the present Cossacks of the Don, but without any definite boundaries, sometimes encroaching on their neighbours and sometimes en¬ croached upon by them, like the Tartar hordes at this day. Their name has been supposed by some to be a synonym for “ archers.” Their habits were very like those of the terrible Huns and Magyars who overran part of Europe in the last agonies of SCYTHIA. Home and afterwards ; but the difficulty of identify¬ ing a modern and civilised race with an ancient and barbarous one, is shown by the dissimilarity of the handsome and chivalrous Hungarians with their hid¬ eous and unkempt progenitors. They seem to have inherited from them little besides their love of horse¬ flesh—in the civilised sense. That the Scythians disappeared from history, when history itself was at its lowest ebb, is no proof that they exist nowhere now. Their language, specimens of which are given by Herodotus, undoubtedly be¬ longs to that of the Indo-Germanic family. Their connection with the Sacm is established. Some con¬ nect the Sacae with the Saxons, others also with the Sikhs of northern India. It would indeed be strange if it were discovered from critical philology and ar¬ chaeology that the English were pitted against their cousins at Sobraon, Chilian wall ah, and Gujerat, and recovered India through their aid afterwards ; and that some of our Saxon ancestors were those who fought best on the losing side at Marathon and Platoea. Cer¬ tain it is that nearly all the now dominant races of mankind seem to have swarmed, at longer or shorter intervals, from some mysterious hive about or beyond the Caucasus. History records some of the waves of their western or eastern progress. Before the Scythi¬ ans came a swarm of Cimmerians, sweeping over Asia Minor in the time of the predecessors of Croesus. Their name is still retained in the Crimea and Krim Tartarv. They reappear as Cimbri in the latter days of the li<>- man republic, to which they were very near giving the finishing stroke. Then they are heard of in Schleswick and Jutland, and in Wales it is just possible that at 88 T1IE IUSTORY OF HEROD OTUS. the present day they call themselves Cymry. Before their coming a horde of Celts or Gauls had fallen on Rome, and another invaded Greece later on, leaving permanent settlements in Lombardy and Asia Minor. In earlier history these tidal waves of population came at long intervals, so that the damage they did was reparable, and the silt they left behind them only strengthened the ground ; but in the latter days of the Roman Caesars, they succeeded one another so quickly that the Empire was swamped, and when the disturb¬ ance had subsided, the earth wore a face that was strange and new. The repentant sons of those savage children of the night, calling themselves English, French, Germans, and so forth, are now endeavouring to atone for their fathers’ delinquencies by painfully diving after the relics of lost civilisations, and preserv ing whatever they can find with religious veneration for the use and delight of ages to come. By degrees we are opening up Greece, Italy, Assyria, Persia, India, Egypt, and discovering to our dismay that much of our boasted civilisation is but a parody on what prevailed centuries or millenniums ago; and that, with all our culture, we have still much barbarism to unlearn. The Scythians described by Herodotus, like the Parthians who defeated the Roman legions, are a race of archers on horseback. From them the Greeks may have derived their fables of the Centaurs. As a pas¬ toral people, they were generally averse to the tillage of land, and moved about with their herds from one Peding-ground to another, carrying their skin-covered huts on carts. That the Sarmatians were allied with them appears from the fable which traces their descent to the union of Scythians with Amazons, those wonder «/ / SCYTIIIA. 89 ful viragos whose manlike habits are still kept up by tbe women of some Tartar tribes. To account for the origin of the Scythians, Herodo¬ tus gives two fables. According to one, a certain Targitaus, a son of Jupiter, and grandson by his mother’s side of the river Borysthenes or Dnieper, was the first man in Scythia, He had three sons. At first they were all equal, when there fell from heaven four implements of gold—a plough, a yoke, a battle-axe, and a goblet. The eldest approached to take them, when they broke out iiko flames, and he durst not touch them. The second was rejected in like manner. The youngest fared better : he was able to handle the gold and to carry it off. This was a sign that he should be the king.* From the three * A somewhat similar story was told to Speke by Rumanika, king of Karagufe. “ Before their old father Dagara died, he had unwittingly said to the mother of Rogero, although he was the youngest born, ‘ what a fine king he would make ; ’ and tire mother in consequence tutored him to expect to succeed, although primo¬ geniture is the law’ of the land, subject to the proviso, which was also the rule with the ancient Persians, that the heir must have been born after his father’s accession, which condition was here fulfilled in the case of all three brothers. . . . Rumanika maintained that Rogero was entirely in the w’rong, not only be¬ cause the law 7 was against him, but the judgment of heaven also. On the death of the father, the three sons, who only could pretend to the crowm, had a small mystic drum placed before them by the officers of state. It was only feather-weight in leality, but being loaded with charms, became too heavy foi those not entitled to the crown to move. Neither of the other brothers could move it an inch, while Rumanika easily lifted b with his little finger. ... He (Rumanika) moreover said that a new* test had been invented in his case besides the ordeal of lifting the drum. The supposed rightful heir had to plant 90 TUE III STORY OF HERODOTUS. brothers sprang the three Scythian tribes—the “ Koyal” Scythians from the youngest. According to the other legend, which emanated from a Greek source, Hercules, when he was carrying off the cattle of Geryon (who lived on an island near Cadiz in Spain), came to Scythia, and being overcome by frost and fatigue, wrapt himself in his lion’s skin, and fell asleep. When he awoke his team of mares had disappeared. He wandered in quest of them till he came to a country called the Bush. Here he found in a cave a strange being, half woman, half serpent, who detained him with her by holding out hopes of his recovering his mares, which she had caught and hidden.* Three sons were the himself on a certain spot, when the land on which he stood would rise up like a telescope drawn out till it reached the skies. If he was entitled to the throne, it would then let him down again without harm ; but if otherwise, collapse and dash him to pieces. Of course as he survived the trial, it was successful. On another occasion a piece of iron was found in the ground, about the shape and size of a carrot. This iron could not be extracted by any one but Kumanika himself, who pulled it up with the greatest ease.”—‘Lake Victoria;’ a compilation from the Memoirs ol Captains Speke and Grant. * These legends of serpent-women are not uncommon in German mythology. The following adventure is related by the brothers Grimm ; “One Leonhard, who was a stammerer, but a good fellow, and of irreproachable morals, lost his way one day as he was visiting some underground vaults of the nature of catacombs. All at once he found himself in a deli¬ cious meadow, in the midst of which was playing a young girl, half concealed by the herbage. She invited him to come and rest by her side. Leonhard, out of pure politeness, obeyed her eagerly, and then became aware of a fact which the long grass had at first prevented his observing,—that the damsel, the upper part of whose body was white and beautiful, terminated below in a scaly and serpent-like tail. He wished to fly, but his legs SCYTHIA. 91 result of this strange intimacy—one called Agathyrsus, the other Gelonus, the other Scythes. Hercules, on his departure, left with the mother a how, and a belt with a goblet attached to it. The son who could bend the bow was to inherit the land, the others to emigrate. Scythesj the youngest, bent the bow, and remained to be the father of the kings of Scythia, which accounted for the Scythian custom of wearing a goblet attached to the girdle. In describing the geography of Scythia, of which were immediately caught and embraced by her tail. Thus forced to listen, he now heard the poor creature’s history. She was born a princess, and was enjoying court society, when a malicious enchanter charmed her into her present state, from which she could only be released on one condition, and that was, that she could prevail on some fair young man, who must be perfectly innocent, to give her three kisses. The youth must not be older than twenty-two. There was time for Leonhard to have fulfilled the conditions, for he would be twenty-three on that very day—in two hours more. But, unfortunately, he stammered, and the two hours were almost gone before lie had made the necessar}” preliminary statement as to his birth. Then he gave her the first kiss. Upon that she was seized with violent convulsions, and rolled so wildly on the grass that he fled in alarm. He was, however, recalled by her supplications and promises, and gave her the second kiss. The effect of this was still more electric than that of the first. Her eyes burned like fire, she sprang up, her face glowed and her cheeks seemed bursting; she whirled about like a demoniac, and hissed, shrieked, and yelled like a very Melusina. Frightened out of his wits, the youth rushed away through the meadow and catacombs till the liideous object was out of sight; but after a time, reflecting that he might have made his fortune and married a princess, he turned to go back once more. It was too late; for, to his un¬ speakable chagrin, he just then heard a village clock strike twelve, which made him twenty-three years of age.—X. 1L Saintine, ‘ La Mythologie du Rliin ’ (free translation). 92 THE HISTORY OF HERODOTUS. Herodotus probably knew no more than be may have heard at the Greek factory at Olbia (near the site of the modern Kinburn), he is carried away by the interest of his subject, and launches out into a geo¬ graphical digression, chiefly entertaining as a record of ancient notions, and as showing how facts be¬ come altered in passing from mouth to mouth. The “Scythia” of Herodotus seems to embrace “the basins of the Don, Dnieper, Dniester, and Boug, and the northern half of that of the Lower Danube”*— Le ., a great portion of Russia, Bessarabia, 'YVallachia, and Moldavia. He tells strange stories of the tribes who dwelt around Scythia, as far as the uttermost parts of Europe. The Issedonians and the Andropliagi were given to cannibalism ; the former, like the Callatian Indians, feasting on their fathers, and keeping their skulls set in gold as heirlooms. This custom was, however, balanced with another, which would place them, as some might think now, in the van of progress •—they gave women equal rights with men. The Heuri were said to change into wolves periodically; a tradition which still survives in the “ wehr-wolf ” of the Germans, and the “ loup-garou ” of the French. Liv ingstone relates that there were men in the country above the Zambesi who were supposed to become lions for a term, and that the souls of great captains were thought to pass into the king of beasts. But perhaps the story rose out of the fact that the FTeuri wore wolf- skins in winter. There were people in the extreme north who slept six months in the year (Herodotus’s informant may have said that there was night for six months), and who had goat’s feet—that is, they may * Heeren. SCYTHIA. 93 have worn moccasins. These may have suggested the Satyrs of the Greeks. A common superstition aloo placed a wonderfully good and happy people behind the region of the north wind, called Hyperboreans. So the “ blameless ” Ethiopians were supposed to inhabit the extreme South. The Greeks believed in goodness when a very long way from home. Our author mentions slightly, and with some dis¬ dain, the legend (known also to other writers) of one of these Hyperboreans, Abaris, who was said to have been even a greater traveller than himself-—who “ walked round the world with an arrow, without once eating.” But whatever may be thought of the latter part of the story, it seems highly probable that in Abaris’s “ arrow ” we have a dim tradition of the magnetic needle. Its properties were certainly known to the Chinese long before Herodotus’s date, and some rumour of the marvel might have reached Europe. The story tempts Herodotus into speculative cosmo¬ graphy. He is dissatisfied with the map of Hecatceus, who divided the habitable world into two equal por¬ tions, Europe and Asia, making it like a medal, with the great river of Ocean for a rim; not that he himself at all suspected the world of being a sphere, like some of the later ancients, but that he thought the distribu¬ tion of the continents manifestly unsound. If Herodotus had been in the habit of rejecting every tale that he did not believe, like some later writers, we should have lost the valuable passage which seems to prove that Africa was circumnavigated twenty-one centuries before the time of Diaz and Yasco de Gama. Pharaoh Necho, after giving up the Suez canal as hopeless, sent a fleet of Phoenician ships down 94 THE HISTORY OF HERODOTUS. the Red Sea, ordering them to return to Egypt by the pillars of Hercules—that is, by the Strait of Gibraltar. As these were their orders, it is to be presumed that the route was already known. They spent three years in accomplishing their task, as they had to sow graip on the way, and wait for the harvest. Herodotus pro¬ nounces their voyage apocryphal, because they reported they had the sunrise on their right hand as they sailed round Libya, but which proves indeed that they had doubled the Cape of Good Hope. Sataspes, a Persian, tried to sail round Africa in the other direction, but- failed. He had got beyond Cape Soloeis (Spartel) to a country inhabited by a dwarfish people, who dressed in palm-leaves; and there, as he declared, the ship stopped, and would go no further. He had evidently fallen in with the southerly trade-wind, and was not aware that, in order to proceed, he ought to have pushed across towards the South American continent. He met with a fate worse even than that of some later discoverers : he was not only disbelieved, but put to death on his return. Darius appears to have taken a great interest in such discoveries, and it was he who sent Scylax the Carian down the Indus to explore the Indian Ocean .* Amongst the strange customs which Herodotus re¬ cords of the Scythians was their manner of keeping the anniversary of the burial of then* kings. They slew fifty young men and fifty choice horses, stuffed * This Scylax, or more probably a later writer who traded on his name, brought home some remarkable travellers’ stories. He described an Indian tribe whose feet were so large that they used them as parasols, and another whose ears were so capacious that they slept in them.—See Rawlinson, l. p. 50, note. SC V TUT A. 9b the "bodies of both, and set them up round the tomb in a circle, the men mounted on the horses, a ghastly body-guard for the royal ghost. Their great deity was the god of war, whom they worshipped under the shape of a scimitar The Russian or Turkish vapour-bath would appear to have been another of their institu¬ tions ; but Herodotus seems to confuse it with the process of intoxication by hemp - seed, which was known in early times. They were also distinguished by drunkenness and dislike of foreigners, like some of their supposed descendants, who are not yet cured of these weaknesses. Against this nation Darius is said by Herodotus to have moved a vast army, bridging over the Thracian Bosphorus and the Danube with boats, and taking with him the Ionian tieet, to the custody of whose com¬ manders he committed the bridge over the river, while he passed on into the northern wildernesses. The Scvthians retreated before him towards the Tanais or V Don. Then they led him such a long chase that at last his patience was worn out, and he sent to their king to demand that, as a man of honour, he should either stand and fight, or deliver earth and water in token of submission. The Scythian replied that ho would soon send him some presents more to the purpose. These arrived in due course of time—a bird, a mouse, a frog, and five arrows. Darius at first thought that this signified a tender of homage, but Gobryas, one of the Seven, who had an older head, read the hieroglyphic letter as follows : “ Un¬ less you can fly like a bird, or burrow like a mouse, or swim like a frog, you will not escape the Scyth¬ ian arrows.” Darius took the hint and retreated. 9G THE HISTORY OF HERODOTUS. But Scythian horsemen had reached his bridge before him, and tried to prevail on the Ionians to destroy it. Miltiades the Athenian, now tyrant of the Chersonese (of whom we shall hear again), called upon his fellow- Greeks to strike, once for all, a blow for freedom ; to cut the bridge, and leave their Persian masters to perish. But he was overruled in the interest of Darius by Ilistiseus of Miletus, and the Persian army returned without irretrievable loss from its military promenade in pursuit of the impalpable Scythians. Megabazus remained behind to reduce the Thracian tribes in the neighbourhood of the Hellespont. This leads our author to discuss the ethnology of Thrace. It appeared to him that if its numerous tribes had been only united, they would have been a match for any existing nation. His Thrace must nearly have comprehended the present limits of Eoumelia, Bul¬ garia, Servia, Moldavia, and Wallachia. The Getae or Goths, who were subdued by Darius on his way to Scythia, believed that when they died they went to a good spirit named Zalmoxis, to whom they sent-a mes¬ senger every five years ; that is, they sacrificed a man by tossing him in the air and catching him on points of lances. Another tribe, when a child was born, sat round him, bewailing the miseries he would have to undergo; while in a case of death they made a jubilee of the funeral, believing the departed to have attained everlasting happiness. The same belief was connected with a custom in another tribe corresponding to the “Suttee” of the Hindoos. When a man died there was a sharp contention amongst his widows which was the worthiest to be slain over his grave, and the sur¬ viving wives considered themselves as in disgrace, SCYTUIA. 97 They marked high birth by tattooing, like the South Sea Islanders; and thought idleness, war, and plunder honourable, but agriculture meau. The nation in gen¬ eral worshipped only the gods of battle, of wine, and of the chase. But the kings paid especial honour to a god corresponding to Hermes or Mercury, or the German 'Woden. Less was known of the tribes north of the Danube. The Sigynnse wore a dress like that of the Medes, and possessed a breed of active, hardy, shaggy ponies, the description of which answers to those of the Shetland Islands. Or possibly some vague rumour of the harnessed dogs of Kamskatka may have reached the ears of our author. He does not think that the Thracians could have been correct in saying that a tract of country beyond the Danube was so infested with bees as to be uninhabitable, as bees cannot bear much cold. They may have meant mosquitoes. Megabazus was now commissioned to transport bodily to Persia the whole tribe of the Paeonians, who lived to the north of Macedonia, of whose industry Darius had conceived an exaggerated notion, by seeing one of their women at Sardis bearing a pitcher on her head, leading a horse, and spinning flax all at the same time. He effected this task with no great difficulty; but other tribes resisted his arms with success, and espe¬ cially those who inhabited the Lake Prasias. These must have been a relic of the most ancient population of Europe. Their habits were precisely the same as those of the singular people whose whole manner of life has been brought to light by the discovery of ancient piles in the lakes of Zurich in Switzerland, and who appear to have inhabited nearly all the comparatively shallow lakes that have hitherto been a. o. vol. iii. a 98 THE HISTORY OF HERODOTUS. examined. This pile - city of Prasias is thus do* scribed:— “ Platforms supported on tall piles were fixed in the midst of the lake, approached from the land by a single narrow bridge. Originally all the citizens in com¬ mon drove the piles for the platform, but afterwards every man drove three piles for every wife he married, and they had each several wives. Each man had his own hut on the platform, and his trap-door opening through the scaffolding on the lake below. They tied the little children by the leg to prevent their rolling into the water.” (The proportionate number of chil¬ dren’s bones found in the Swiss lakes would argue that this custom was but negligently observed in those regions.) “ They fed their horses and other cattle upon fish, of which there was such an abundance that they had only to let down a basket through the trap¬ door into the water, and draw it up full.” What was the ultimate fate of this amphibious colony we do not learn; but very many of the cor¬ responding settlements in central Europe bear traces of having been destroyed by fire. For the present these lake-people were impregnable, and Megabazus turned his attention to Macedonia, sending first to the court of King Amyntas an embassy of seven noble Persians to demand earth and water. Amyntas enter¬ tained them at a feast; but when their attentions to the ladies of the court began to be offensive, his son Alex¬ ander, indignant at the insult, dressed up some Mace¬ donian youths to personate the ladies, whom he had managed to withdraw under promise of their return, and assassinated the Persian envoys when heavy with wine. An expedition was afterwards sent to inquire SCYTHIA. 99 after tlieir fate, but Alexander conciliated the com¬ mander with hush-money and the hand of his sistei in marriage. The royal family of Macedonia were ot Argive origin, according to Herodotus ; otherwise, he says, they would not have been allowed to contend at the Olympic games. This Greek descent was used subsequently by Philip of Maced on as a plea for his intervention in the affairs of Greece. A casual notice of the founding of Cyrene leads Herodotus into Libya, whither we have no space to follow him. He touches on the known North African tribes, and glances at the unknown, relating many marvellous stories; in fact, his love for anthropology and geography makes him seize any excuse for im¬ parting information. He wellnigh exhausts the world as known to the ancients, and might have wept, as Alexander did that he had no more worlds to con¬ quer, that he had no more to describe. Of one remote and apocryphal region he confesses he knew nothing. He was not sure that the islands called the Cassiter- ides (“Tin-Islands”) had any real existence; but he had been told that tin came “from the ends of the earth.” Such is the sole notice which the great tra¬ veller has left of us or our ancestors; for it is probable that the Oassiterides were the coast of Cornwall. CHAPTER VII. THE TYRANTS OF GREECE. jB u If gods will not misfortune send. List to tlie counsel of a friend : 7 Call on thyself calamity ; And that, from all thy treasures bright. In which thy heai-t takes most delight, Commit forthwith to deepest sea.” —Schiller, “ Ring of Polycrates.” • • The original constitution of most of the Greek States was a limited monarchy, though the king was emphati¬ cally “ hedged by divinity,” since the founder of his family was generally supposed to be a god. In time, as the royal prestige wore out, this constitution was generally superseded by an oligarchy, which lasted until some ambitious individual, by courting the un¬ privileged classes, managed to raise himself to the supremacy. In the fifth century before Christ there were so many of these usurpers at the same time in Greece, that it has been called the Age of Tyrants. Mr Grote j)refers to call them “despots but the name matters little if no sinister meaning is necessarily attached to ' the word Tyrant. Their number at one time was a fact in support of those who believe in social and THE TYRANTS OF GREECE. 101 political epidemics. One of the most famous of them was Polycrates of Samos. He was great in arms and arts, and the poet Anacreon was the companion of his revels, just as Goethe enjoyed his Rhenish with Charles Augustus, the jolly Grand-Duke of Weimar. His pros¬ perity was so perfect, that his friend King Amasis of Egypt, as a prudent man, thought it his duty to give him a solemn warning, and advised him to avert the anger of the gods by sacrificing some object which he held very precious. Polycrates chose out of his abundant treasures a favourite emerald ring, which he at once threw into the sea. Eive or six days after¬ wards, a poor fisherman caught so magnificent a fish that it struck him that it was only fit to set before a king. To Polycrates, therefore, he presented it, with many compliments. The tyrant, with his usual geni¬ ality, made it a condition that the fisherman would come and help him to eat it. He bashfully accepted the honour. When the fish was served, behold ! the emerald ring was there in its inside. The servants were exceedingly glad that the king’s lost ring was found—possibly they had been charging each other with stealing it; but Polycrates looked serious, for he felt that the gods had rejected his offering. He thought it right to inform his friend Amasis of the result. Amasis, with less generosity than foresight, at once sent a herald to Samos to renounce the alli¬ ance of Polycrates, as he felt sure that the gods had decreed his ruin, and did not wish to be himself involved in it. The tale of the fisherman and the ring has been transferred to Arabian fable. Fortune still continued to smile on Polycrates, and he overcame all his enemies by force or fraud. Some 102 THE HISTORY OF HERODOTUS. Samians, whom he had driven out, managed to set on foot against him an expedition from Lacedaemon. The visit of these people to Sparta is characteristically told. They made a long speech there in the assembly, which they would have hardly done if they had known the Spartan temper better. The authorities made re¬ ply that they had forgotten the first half of their dis¬ course, and could not understand the second. The Samians then held up an empty bag, merely remark¬ ing, “The bag wants flour.” The Spartans said that the word “ bag ” was quite unnecessary—the gesture was enough. However, they sent a force to Samos to support the exiles; and Poly crates is said to have bribed them to return with leaden money gilt over. The existence of the story is singularly illustrative of the avarice as well as the gullibility of this people. But the doom of Poly crates could only be deferred. Towards the end of the reign of Cambyses, he was un¬ fortunate enough to excite the cupidity of Oroetes, the Persian satrap of Sardis, who proceeded to set a trap for him. Oroetes said that he feared the covetousness of Cambyses, and offered to deposit all his treasure with Polycrates. The latter sent his secretary to inspect it, who was shown some large chests full of stones, just covered with gold. Satisfied with this report, in spite of all the warnings of his daughter, Polycrates staited for the court of Oroetes to fetch the treasure. The satrap at once arrested him, put him to a cruel death, and then impaled his dead body. But the murderer after¬ wards came to a violent end himself in the reign of Darius. Another specimen of a tyrant, and this, too, in our common acceptation of the word, was Periander of T1IE TYRANTS OF GREECE. 103 Corinth, the son of Cypselus. By his origin he was partly patrician and partly plebeian. At one time the government of Corinth was in the hands of a single family called the Bacchiadse, who only intermarried with one another. But one of them happened to have a daughter called, from her lameness, Labda (from the Greek letter A (L), which originally had one leg shorter than the other), whom her parents were, on this account, obliged to marry out of the family to one Aetion, a man of the people. In consequence of oracles which boded ill to Corinth from a son of Aetion, the rulers sent ten of their number to despatch the in¬ fant as soon as he was born. When they came and asked to see the child, Labda showed it them, thinking their visit was only complimentary. They had agreed that whoever took the child first in his arms should dash it on the ground. Providentially, however, the babe smiled in the man’s face who had taken him, so that he had no heart to kill it, but passed it on to his neighbour, and he to another, and so it went through all the ten. When the mother had carried the child indoors again, she overheard the party outside loudly reproaching one another with their faint-heartedness in not making away with it. Fearing from this that they would return, she hid the child away in a chest or corn-bin, so that when they re-entered they could not find him. From this escape be was called Cyp¬ selus or ‘ Bin.’ When he grew up he made himself despot of Corinth, and ruled harshly, visiting the citizens with confiscations, banishment, and death. He reigned thirt y years, and then his son Periander succeeded him, who, at first, was a mild ruler, until he sent to Thrasj btilus, despot of Miletus, to ask him 104 T1IE HISTORY OF HERODOTUS. the "best way of governing his people. Thrasybulus took the Corinthian herald forth into the fields, and as he passed through the corn, still questioning him about Corinthian affairs, he snapped off and threw away all the ears that overtopped the rest. He walked through the whole field doing this, till the damage was considerable. After this he dismissed his visitor without a word of advice. When the messenger returned to Periander, he said that he had been sent on a fool’s errand to a madman, who gave him no answer, but only walked through a field spoiling his wheat by plucking off all the longest ears.* Periander said nothing ; but he understood the meaning of Thra¬ sybulus, which was, that he was to govern by cutting off all the foremost citizens. After this he became a much worse tyrant than his father, and finished the work which he had begun. On one occasion he stripped all the women of Corinth of their clothes. Having sent to consult an oracle of the deadf about some lost property, the shade of his wife Melissa (whom he had put to death) appeared to him, and said that she was cold, and had literally nothing to put on ; for the robes buried with her were of no use, since they had nol been burnt. So he made proclama¬ tion that all the matrons should go to the temple of Juno in full dresS, and there having surrounded them * The English reader will remember the words of the gardener in Shakespeare :— “ Go thou, and like an executioner, Cut off the heads of too fast-growing sprays, That look too lofty in our comm on wealth." — ‘Richard II.,’ Act. iii. sc. 4. t Hence the word “necromancy.” The parallel of Saul, the witch of Endor, and the ghost of Samuel, is at once suggested. THE TYRANTS OF GREECE. 105 with his guards, took all their clothes from them, and burnt them as an offering to his dead queen. The relations of Periander with his younger son Lycophron form one of the most touching episodes in 1 lerodotus. The lad had learnt the fact of his mother’s murder, and from that time would neither speak to his father nor answer him. The father at last banished him from his house. He even sent warning to the friends with whom his son took refuge, that all who harboured him did so at their peril—nay, that any who even spoke to him should pay a fine to Apollo. The lad Avandered miserably from one to the other, and at last Avas found lying in the public porticoes. Then Periander himself Avent to him, and upbraided him Avith his folly in de¬ priving himself by his obstinacy of a princely home. Lycophron only ansAvered by reminding his father that he had iioav himself incurred the forfeit to the god. Per¬ iander saw that the case Avas hopeless, and sent him to Corcyra for safe keeping. But Avhen he found himself growing old, and unequal to the cares of government, and saAV that his elder son Avas quite incompetent, he sent to offer to resign in Lycophron’s favour. Ho reply came. Then the father sent his favourite sister to treat with him, and try to soften his heart. Lyco¬ phron’s ansAver Avas that he Avould never set foot again in Samos Avhile his father lived. Periander humbled himself so far as to offer to retire himself to Corcyra, and allow the son to take his place. To this Lycophron agreed ; on hearing Avhich the people of Corcyra mur¬ dered him, in dread of receiving as their master the I errible Periander. A pleasanter story in connection Avith him will bo best told, as nearly as may be, in the old historian’s the history of iifrodotus. H>G own words, with a little retrenchment of his dif¬ fuseness. Arion and the Dolphin. In Periander’s days there lived a minstrel of Lesbos, Arion by name, who was second to none as a player on the lute. This Arion, who spent most of his time with Periander, sailed to Italy and Sicily, and having earned by his minstrelsy great store of treasure, hired a Corin¬ thian ship to go back to Corinth—for whom should he trust rather than the Corinthians, whom he knew so well. When the crew were out at sea, they took counsel together to throw Arion overboard, and keep his treas¬ ure. But he divined their intent, and besought them to take his money, but spare his life. But the ship- men refused, and bade him either straightway kill him¬ self on board, so that he might be buried on shore, or leap into the sea of his own freewill. Then Arion, being in a sore strait, begged, since it must be so, that he might don his vestments, and sing one strain stand¬ ing on the quarterdeck ; and when he had ended his song he promised to despatch himself. [He asked to put on his sacred garb, knowing that thereby he should gain the protection of Apollo.] The seamen consented, as well pleased once more to hear the master of all singers, and made space to hear him, withdrawing into the midship; and he chanted a lively air, and then plunged overboard, all as he was. So they sailed away to Corinth, and thought no more of Arion. But, lo ! a dolphin took the minstrel up on his back, and landed him safely at the promontory of Tsenarus in Laconia, whence he made his way to Corinth, all in his sacred robes, and told there all that had befallen him. But TTIE TYRANTS OF GREECE. 107 Periander did not believe him, and kept him under guard. At last the shipmen came, and when Periander asked them what had become of Arion, they said they had left him safe and sound at Tarentum, in Italy. Then Periander produced Arion in his vestments, just as he was when he leapt overboard, and they were struck dumb, and could deny their guilt no more. And Arion set up, as a thank-offering to the god, an effigy of a man riding on a dolphin. Such is the legend given by Herodotus. Another version makes Apollo appear to Arion in a dream, assuring him of succour before he leapt overboard, and adds that, after landing, the bard neglected to put back again into the sea his preserver, who con¬ sequently perished, and was buried by the king of the country. When the sailors came, they were made to swear to the truth of their story on the dolphin’s tomb, where Arion had been previously hid. When he sud¬ denly appeared, they confessed their guilt, and were punished by crucifixion, for the double crime of rob¬ bery with intent to murder, and perjury. Arion and his bearer afterwards became a constellation, by the will of Apollo, according to a later addition to the legend. It is not impossible that the legend of Arion grew out of the group of the man on the dolphin, which may have been set up to commemorate the expedition which sailed from Laconia to found Tarentum, comprised of Dorian and Achaean Greeks; the dolphin, sacred to Neptune, symbolising the Achaean element, and the minstrel, loved of Apollo, the Dorian. The legend of f -olston, the munificent Bristol merchant, whose anniver- 103 THE HISTORY OF HERODOTUS. sary is still celebrated at Bristol, is well known in the west of England. A ship in which he sailed was said to have sprung a leak, which was miraculously plugged by a self-sacrificing dolphin, and so the ship came home safe. Some rationalists have volunteered the prosaic explanation that Colston was saved and brought home in another vessel called the Dolphin. One of the charitable societies formed in his honour bears the name of the “ Dolphin.” The sacred character of this fish (or rather "cetacean) is doubtless of remote anti¬ quity. He is tlie subject of a little poem (exquisite in the original) by Philip of Thessalonica. The Dolphin and the Nightingale. “ Blaming Boreas, o’er the sea I was flying slowly, For the wind of Thrace to me is a thing unholy, When his back a dolphin showed, bending with devotion, And the child of aether rode on the child of ocean. I am that sweet-chanting bird whom the night doth smile at ; And like one that kept his word proved my dolphin pilo/ - As he glided onward still with his oarless rowing, With the lute within my bill I did cheer his going. Dolphins never ply for hire, but for love and glory, When the sons of song require ; trust Arion’s story.” There is also a beautiful version of the legend by the Boman poet Ovid. Cleisthenes of Sicyon was another eminent tyrant, and a magnificent man in every way. lie had ono beautiful daughter named Agariste, through* whom des¬ potism was fated to receive its death-blow in Athens. Like the Orsinis and Col on n as of medieval Rome, THE TYRANTS OF GREECE. 109 whose feuds gave Eienzi his opportunity to establish democracy, the patrician families of the Isagorids and Alcmoeonids strove for supremacy at Athens, and their strife gave birth to freedom. Herodotus gives a quaint account of the foundation of the great wealth of the latter family. Alcmaeon, the son of Megacles, had assisted Croesus in his negotiations with the Delphic oracle, and was invited in consequence to the court of Sardis. When he had arrived, Croesus gave him leave to go into the treasury and take as much gold as he could carry away on his person at one time. So he put on the largest tunic he could find, so as to make a capacious fold, and the roomiest buskins. First he stowed his boots with gold dust, then he packed his clothes with it, then he powdered his hair with it, and lastly he took a mouth¬ ful of it, and so came out of the treasury “ dragging his legs with difficulty, and looking like anything rather than a human being, as his mouth was choked up, and everything about him wms in a plethoric state.” When Croesus saw him he was highly amused, and gave him what he had taken and as much again. When Alcmaeon came home to Athens he found him¬ self rich enough to enter as a competitor at the great Olympic games, and win the blue ribbon of that national festival—the four-horse chariot-race, which made the winner a hero in the eyes of his countrymen for ever. Two generations afterwards this family made a splen¬ did marriage. Cleisthenes of Sicyon had added this to his renown, that he too had been a victor at Olympia. Under these circumstances he was not inclined to throw away a beauty and heiress like his 110 THE HISTORY OF HERODOTUS. daughter Agariste on the first comer, hut, like the father in Goldoni’s “ Matrimonio per concorsohe pro¬ claimed that she should he wooed and won hy public competition. He invited all the most eligible youths in Greece to come and spend a year at his court, pro¬ mising to give his decision when it had elapsed; and lie prepared an arena expressly for the purpose of test¬ ing their athletic proficiency. Among the suitors was the exquisite Smyndyrides of Syharis, the most luxu¬ rious man of the most luxurious Hellenic city. It was he who was said to have complained of the crumpled rose-leaf on his couch, and to have fainted when he once saw a man hard at work in the fields. He would certainly have broken down in the athletic ordeal, hsot so Males, the hi other of Titormus, a kind of hu¬ man gorilla of enormous strength who lived in the wilds of Hitolia; but he would scarcely have been polished enough as a son-indaw for Cleisthenes. And the father might be loath to intrust his daughter to the son of Pheidon, the despot of Argos, a man notorious for rapacity and violence. The two Athenian candi¬ dates, Megacles son of Alcmseon,* and Hippocleides, a member of the great rival family, were probably the favourites from the first; for it is hard to imagine that there was no betting on an occasion so tempting to the sporting characters of antiquity. Cleisthenes having first ascertained that his guests could give satisfactory references, made proof of their manhood, their tempers, their accomplishments, and their tastes,—sometimes bringing them altogether, sometimes holding private * The son in this family took the grandfather’s name : Mle¬ gacies, Alcmreon, Megacles, Alcnueon, and so on. This whs A lcmieon II. THE TYRANTS OF GREECE. Ill conversations with each. Although gymnastics were very important, he seemed to have laid most stress on their qualities as diners-out. The man who at the end of the year seemed, in the opinion of all, to have the best chance, was Hippocleides, who indeed was connected with the royal Cypselids of Corinth, as well as an Athenian of the highest fashion. When the great day arrived for the suitors to know their fate, Cleisthenes sacrificed a hundred oxen, and gave a pub¬ lic feast, to which he invited not only the foreign suitors, but all his own people. After the feast there was one more trial in music and in rhetoric,—probably to see how the suitors could carry their wine. As the cup went round, Hippocleides, abashing the rest of the party by his assurance, called to the flute-player to strike up a dance. Then he danced, in a manner which gave perfect satisfaction to himself, though Cleisthenes began to look grave. Next he ordered a table to be brought in, mounted on it, and rehearsed certain Laco¬ nian and Attic figures. To crown all, he stood on his head and kicked his legs in the air. This last per¬ formance, which Hippocleides might perhaps have learnt in his youth from the street-boys of the Piraeus, was too much for Cleisthenes, who had long contained himself with difficulty. u Son of Tisander, thou hast danced away thy marriage,” he exclaimed, in fierce disgust. The other quietly answered, “Hippocleides does not care ! ” from which “ Hippocleides don’t care ” became a proverbial expression. Then, as Herodotus tells us, Cleisthenes rose and spoke to this effect:— “ Gentlemen, suitors of my daughter,—I am well pleased with you all—so well pleased that, if it were pos¬ sible, I would make you all my sons-in-law. But as 1 112 THE HISTORY OF HERODOTUS. have hut one daughter, that is unfortunately impossible. You have all done me much honour in desiring the alliance of my house. In consideration of this, and of the inconvenience to which you have been put in wasting your valuable time at my court, I beg to present you with a talent of silver each. But to Megacles, the son of Alcmreon, I betroth my daughter Agariste tc be his wife according to the usage of Athens.” The issue of this marriage was Cleisthenes, the great Athenian reformer, who was named after his maternal grandfather. Pisistratus, the despot of Athens, has been already mentioned as contemporary with Croesus. He Avon immortality by digesting the poems of Homer into a consecutive whole,—settling, as it were, the canon of the Greek Scriptures. His rule Avas just and mild, until his enemies forced greater seA r erity upon him in his latter days. He Avas succeeded by his son Hippias. An abor¬ tive attempt to assassinate this prince Avas made by two men bound together by the tie of romantic friendship peculiar to the Greeks, Harmodius and Aristogeiton. This pair have always been celebrated as model patriots by the admirers of tyrannicide; but they bungled in their business by slaying the Avrong brother, Hipparchus instead of Hippias, and only provoked Hippias to ster¬ ner measures of repression. At last the Alcnneonids, groAving weary of exile, made such strong interest Avith the god of Delphi that his oracle continually urged the Spartans to expel the Pisistratids. The clan, after a long struggle, Avere compelled to quit Athens, and re¬ tired to Sigeium, on the Hellespont, having selected this asylum as most convenient for intriguing with the Court of Persia for their restoration. They had ruled in THE TYRANTS OF GREECE. 113 Athens from b.c. 560 to b.c. 510, which was about the date of the expulsion of the kings from Rome. They traced their origir to Codrus and Melantlius, semi- mythical kings of Attica, and remotely to the Homeric Nestor of Pylos, after whose son Pisistratus the great ruler of Athens was named. A festival song in honour of the famous tyrannicides was long the “ Marseillaise ” of republican Athens :— The Sword and the Myrtle. I’ll wreath with myrtle-bough my sword, Like those who struck down Athens’ lord, Our laws engrafting equal right on— Harmodius and Aristogeiton. Harmodius dear, thou art not dead, But in the happy isles, they say, Where fleet Achilles lives for aye, And good Tydeides Diomed. I’ll wreath my sword with myrtle-bough. Like those who laid Hipparchus low, When on Athene’s holiday The tyrant wight they dared to slay. Because they slew him, and because They gave to Athens equal laivs, Eternal fame shall shed a light on Harmodius and Aristogeiton. k. c. vol. iii. H 1 CHAPTER Virt IONIa. u 0 for a tongue to curse the slave, Whose treason, like a deadly blight. Comes o’er the counsels of the brave. And blasts them in their hour of might! ’’ —Moore, “ Fire-Worshippers.” Darius had not forgotten the good service done him by Histiseus of Miletus, in preserving the Danube bridge for him on his hurried retreat from the Scythian expe¬ dition. He had given him a grant of land in Thrace, in a most desirable position for a new settlement. But he was afterwards persuaded that he had done wrong. A shrewd Greek would be tempted to form there the nucleus of an independent power. He there¬ fore sent for Histiseus, and detained him in an honour able captivity in his own court at Susa. And this detention led to the great Persian war. There was a revolution in the little island of Naxos. “ The men of substance,” as they were literally called, were expelled, and came to Miletus begging Arista g- oras, now deputy - governor in the absence of his father-in-law Histiseus, to restore them. Thinking to get Naxos for himself, Aristagoras procured the aid of IONIA. 115 a Persian flotilla. On the way, a quarrel arose about a Greek captain whom Megabates, the Persian admiral, had punished, because he found no watch set on board his ship. The punishment consisted in binding him down so that his head protruded from one of the ports or rowlocks, and Aristagoras had taken upon himself to release him. Megabates, in dudgeon, sent to warn the Naxians, who were to have been surprised, and the expedition failed. Then Aristagoras, finding himself unable to pay the expenses of the armament, as had been stipulated, thought of securing his position by the desperate expedient of stirring up a revolt at Miletus against Persia. He was confirmed in this resolution by the arrival of a singular courier from. Histiaeus, who was determined at any cost to escape from the forced hospitalities of Susa. Histiaeus had taken a slave, shaved his head, punctured certain letters on the bare crown, then kept him till the hair was grown, and sent him to Aristagoras with merely the verbal message that he was to shave his head. When Aristagoras had played the barber, he found that the living despatch bore the word “ revolt.” His first step was to proclaim democracy throughout the Greek confederacy. The different despots were given up to their fellow-citizens, to be dealt with ac¬ cording to their deserts. It speaks strongly in favour of the character of their “tyranny,” that nearly all were dismissed uninjured. One only—Coes of Mytilene — was stoned to death. Aristagoras then set sail for Sparta to seek for aid. That state at this time en¬ joyed the singular constitution of a double monarchy. This may have bad some mythological connection with the legend of the twin sons of Leda, Castor and 110 THE HISTORY OF HERODOTUS. Pollux, who became sea-gods, from whom the con¬ stellation of the Gemini was named; but Herodot J »s assigns to it a different origin. His tradition is that when the sons of Hercules reconquered their heritage of the Peloponnese, one of their three chiefs, Aristodemus, had the kingdom of Sparta for his share. His wife gave birth to twins just before his death. The boys were much alike; and the mother, hoping that they might both be kings, protested that she did not know them apart. The Spartans were puzzled; and the Delphic oracle gave an answer which hardly mended the matter, except so far that it satisfied the mother. “ Let both be kings, but let the elder have more honour.” But which was the elder 1 that was the question. At last it was suggested that a watch should be set to see which the mother washed and fe^. first. If she acted on system, the case was clear. The espionage suc¬ ceeded ; the elder was discovered, and named Eurys- thenes, and the other Procles. The two brothers, when they grew up, were said to have been always at vari¬ ance, and their separate lines continued so ever after. The two kings had peculiar duties, rights, and privi¬ leges, but lived in the same plain way as other citizens. When Aristagoras arrived at Sparta, he was admit¬ ted to an audience with the senior king, Cleomenes. He showed him a bronze tablet engraved with a chart—tho earliest known map of the world—pointed out where all the different nations lay, and conjured him to assist his kinsmen the Tomans ; observing, that it was foolish IONIA. 117 for the Spartans to fritter away their force in local feuds, when they might he lords of Asia. As for the Persians, they were an easy prey—men who actually “ went into battle with trousers on.” Cleomenes pro¬ mised to give him an answer in three days. At the second interview he asked “ how far it was to Susa 1 ?” Aristagoras was unguarded enough to say, “ a three months’ journey on which Cleomenes ordered him to quit Sparta before sunset. Then he returned and sat before the king in the sacred guise of a suppliant, with an olive-bough in his hand. A little daughter of Cleomenes, named Gorgo, aged eight or nine, was standing at her father’s side. The Milesian wished her to be sent away, but Cleomenes told him to say on, and not to heed the child. Then Aristagoras be¬ gan by offering ten talents, and as the king shook his head, increased them by degrees to fifty. When this sum was mentioned, the child cried out, “ Go away, father, or the strange man will be sure to bribe thee.’’ * The “conscience of the king” was moved. He with¬ drew to escape the temptation, and the mission of Aristagoras failed at Sparta. At Athens he had better chances of success. Athens was in the heyday of her first freedom. She had rid herself of her Tyrants, the Pisistratids, who were at * Gorgo was well worthy to become, as she afterwards did, the wife of Leonidas. An incident in her married life, subse¬ quently related by Herodotus, seems to militate against the dictum of Aristotle that the Spartan women were inferior to the men. All the authorities of Sparta were puzzled by the arrival of a waxen tablet (the usual form of a despatch) with nothing written on it. When Gorgo heard of it, she at once suggeoted that the wax should be scraped off, and the despatch was found engraven on the wood. 118 THE HISTORY OF HERODOTUS. this moment intriguing with Persia, not without sue* cess, for their restoration. The feelings of the citizens towards these powerful absentees and their Asiatic friends were much the same as those of the French of 1792 towards the Emigration and its abettors. The two great ruling families were now the rival houses of Alcmseon and Isagoras. Clcistlienes the Alcmseonid, grandson of the tyrant of Sicyon, might not have thought it worth his while to court the people, had he not been cleterriiined to put down the rival faction which was led by Isagoras, brother of his father’s rival Hippocleides, of dancing notoriety. As it was, he brought about a complete democratic revolution. He broke up the four old tribes, which were bound by family ties and sacied rites, and made ten new geo¬ graphical divisions. This was as radical a change as the substitution of departments for provinces in France; and the introduction of the decimal system, in nearly every department of state at Athens, anticipated by more than two thousand years the work of the French Revolution. The Isagorids for a time turned the tables on the Alcmseonids, by calling in the assistance of the Spartans, and Cleisthenes had only just defeated a dangerous confederacy against Athens. The Spartans had invaded Attica from Megara, when the Boeotians and Chalcidians broke in upon their northern frontier. But the usual jealousy between the two Spartan kings, and the defection of their Corinthian allies, dissolved the Spartan army, and left the Athenians at leisure to deal with their other enemies. They defeated the Boeotians with great slaughter, taking seven hun¬ dred prisoners ; and crossing on the same day to Euboea, there obtained a second victory over the Chalcidians, in 10X1 A. K9 whose lands they afterwards planted a military colony. The prisoners were ransomed, hut their chains still hung in the citadel of Athens in the time of Herod¬ otus on the walls blackened with Persian fire, and a handsome bronze quadriga stood by the gateway, which had been offered to Minerva from the tithe of the ransom. Its inscription was to this effect:— “ Armies of nations twain, Boeotia banded with Chalcis, Sons of Athenian sires quelled in the labour of war, Slaking their ardent pride in a dismal fetter of iron— Then to the Maid for tithe gave we the chariot-and- four.” The energy of Athens at this time struck Herodotus forcibly. It was like that of the French Jacobins when they had enemies on every frontier, and the Vendee and the Federals of the South on their hands besides. Great political changes give a nation a present sense of life and happiness, which is too often ultimately wrecked by selfishness, but which seems for a time to inspire superhuman strength. The worsted Thebans stirred up the little island of FEgina, which was always a thorn in the side of Athens till she had become mistress of the sea. There was a very old-standing feud about some sacred images or fetishes of olive-wood, representing the goddess Ceres and her daughter Persephone. Ho doubt thdr holiness was enhanced by their age and ugliness. Artistic beauty seems to have little to do with the sacred ness of images, and in modern times in Italy an old black Madonna has been an object of pecu¬ liar veneration. The Zeus of Phidias and the Aphro¬ dite of Praxiteles were not moulded by the hands of Faith. The Athenians had just refused a demand of the 120 THE HISTORY OF HERODOTUS. Persian satrap of Sardis for the restoration of their tyrant Hippias, when Aristagoras arrived. They received him with open arms, not only on account of this, but also because Miletus was their own colony ; and de¬ spatched twenty ships—probably all they could spare from the ZEginetan war—to aid the Milesians in their struggle against the yoke of Persia. These were joined by live galleys from Eretria in Euboea, that city being under an obligation to the Milesians. The crews left their ships on the shore near Ephesus, and inarched on and surprised Sardis, shutting up the Persians in the cita¬ del. But Sardis proved to them a miniature Moscow'. The town, mainly built of v 7 ood and reeds, caught fire, and the buccaneers thought it best to retreat as soon as a sack became out of the question. But the Persian forces caught them up near Ephesus, and inflicted severe punishment before they could reach their ships. The Ionian Greeks were now left to themselves by the Athenians, but the insurrection assumed large propor¬ tions, involving the whole Greek seaboard of Asia, many inland tribes, and lastly spreading to the island of Cyprus. When Darius heard of the great revolt, and espe¬ cially cf the burning of Sardis, his wrath was greatly kindled against the Athenians. He took a bow and shot towards heaven, saying, “ 0 Zeus ! grant that I may be avenged on the Athenians!” He also appointed a slave tc say to him thrice every day during dinner, “ O king ! remember the Athenians.” * Then he sent * There is a parallel symbolism in the case of Elisha and Joash (2 Kings xiii. 17): “Then Elisha said, Shoot; and he shot. And he said, The arrow of the Lord's deliverance, and the arrow of deliverance from Syria. ” 10X1 A. 121 for Histiaeus, telling him that lie suspected he knew something about the business. But the Greek’s innocent look and plausible words deceived the king, who was induced to send him to the coast—the very thing lie had desired—to help to quell the insurrection. At Sardis Histiaeus found an astuter head to deal with. The satrap there was Artaphernes the king’s brother. He said, “I see how it is, Histiaeus—thou hast stitched the shoe, and Aristagoras has put it on.” But the adroit Ionian managed for the time to escape out ot all his difficulties. He even outwitted Artaphernes so far, that, as Mr Grote supposes, he got him to executo a number of innocent Persians at Sardis, by opening a treasonable correspondence with them. The Milesians, however, would not receive him back as governor : he therefore persuaded the Lesbians to give him eight triremes, with which he took to piracy on his own ac¬ count in the parts about the Hellespont. While ma¬ rauding on the coast near Lesbos, he was defeated by a Persian force which happened to be there, and his captors, fearing lest the good-natured Darius might par¬ don him, put him to death at Sardis. Their fears were well founded; for when they sent his head to the king, Darius expressed much regret, and ordered it to be buried with all honour. This is quite consistent with the character of the Persian king as drawn by the prophet Daniel. It seems as if no one who had once done him a service could ever afterwards forfeit his good graces. After reducing Cyprus, the Persians fell with their combined force on the Ionians and their allies. A vic¬ tory won by the Greek fleet over the Phoenician sailors of Darius had no result of importance. The Carians \ 'll THE HISTORY OF HERODOTUS. fought most valiantly, and cut off a whole Persian division by an ambuscade. Though they lost in one battle ten thousand men, yet their spirit was unbroken. Miletus, too, still held out gallantly. If any man un¬ der these circumstances ought to have shown an ex¬ ample of self-devotion, that man was Aristagoras. But nerve is inconsistent with levity of character. It often happens that the coward runs into the jaws of his fate, and so it happened to him. He abandoned the Toman cause, and with some of his partisans sailed away for his father-in-law’s new settlement in Thrace, where he was killed while besieging some petty town. He had been just in time to make his fruitless escape, for the Persians now proceeded to invest Miletus by land and sea. The allied Greeks decided on leaving it to defend itself by land, and concentrating their fleet at a small island off the coast. The allies counted in all three hundred and fifty triremes, which were confronted by six hundred in the service of Persia. The Persian com¬ manders first tried to dissolve the hostile confedera¬ tion by sending the deposed despots each to their own countrymen with promises of pa. don on submission, and threats of extermination in case of prolonged resistance. The plan so far failed that it did not supersede the ne¬ cessity of an action, for each separate state imagined it¬ self the only one to which overtures were made. The Ionian captains, in their council of war, now agreed to put themselves all under the command of Dionysius of Phocaea. He set to work to put the ships in con stunt training, especially practising a manoeuvre some¬ thing like that of Nelson, — attacking the enemy s line in columns, and cutting through it. The inven¬ tion of steam-rams seems likelv to make the sea-fights IONIA. 123 of the future more like those of the remote past than ever. The incidents of the Merrimac’s battle and of Lissa recall the collisions of ancient navies, only that the oars of the galleys are superseded by steam-engines. Their sails were not used in action, as they would have only embarrassed the rowers. To sweep away a whole broadside of oars by cleverly shaving the enemy, and then turn sharply and ram him home on the quarter, was doubtless a favourite evolution of the best sailors. Dionysius was too much of a martinet for the self-in¬ dulgent Ionians. He kept them at sea all night—an unheard-of innovation—and at drill all day, and the days were terribly hot. They had not bargained for this when they chose him admiral. They began to murmur. “What god have we offended that we should be thus victimised ? What fools we were to give our¬ selves up body and soul to this Pliocsean bully, who commands but three ships of his own ! We shall fall sick with the work and heat. The Persians can but make us slaves, and no da very can well be worse than this. Let us mutiny.” So they landed and encamped on the island, lolled in the shade all day, and refused to go on board any more. Then the Persian poison began to work. ./Laces, the son of Syloson, lately tyrant of Samos, succeeded in persuading his country¬ men to promise to desert, and they alone had sixty ships. Little could be hoped now from a general battle, but the battle took place. The Samians went off, all but eleven ships, whose stanch captains, like Nelson at Copenhagen with his blind eye to the tele¬ scope, would not see the signal of retreat. Most of the other allied squadrons, when they saw what the Samians were doing, imitated their bad example. The Chian 124 . THE HISTORY OF HERODOTUS. contingent, with the Samian eleven and a few others, maintained a desperate struggle. The hundred Chian ships, each with forty picked marines on board, charged repeatedly through the enemy’s line. When they had taken many of his galleys, and lost half their own, such as were able made their way to their own island. Their damaged ships made for Mycale, where the crews ran them ashore and marched to Ephesus. But ill fortune followed them. It was night, and the Ephesians were celebrating a feast, whose chief ceremony was a torch¬ light procession of women. Thinking them a party of freebooters come to carry off their wives and daughters, the citizens sallied out and cut them all to pieces. Dionysius the Phocsean had taken three ships, thus exactly doubling his own number. When he saw that the fight was lost, he made straight for the coast of Phoenicia, left undefended by the absence of their war-galleys, sank a number of merchantmen in the harbours, and gained by this booty the means of set¬ ting up handsomely as a corsair in Sicily, where ho plundered Carthaginians and Tyrrhenians, but—with “ a refinement of delicacy very unusual,” as Mr Raw- linson observes—let all Greek vessels go free. The fall of Miletus soon followed the sea-fight. Most of the men were killed, and the women and children enslaved. The Athenians were deeply affected by the news, and when their poet Phrynichus brought on the stage his tragedy of the “ Capture of Miletus,” the audience burst into tears, and he was fined a thousand drachmas (francs), and forbidden ever to exhibit it again. The revolt, which had now been desperately maintained for six years, was terribly expiated. The towns on the coast were as far as possible depopulated 10 XI A. 125 (the people being sent to tlie interior); and the islands were traversed by lines of soldiers, who “ netted ” the inhabitants from one side to the other. Cities and temples were burnt to the ground. The Chians had been warned of coming evil by terrible portents. Of a hundred youths sent to Delphi, all but two had died of a pestilence ; and just before the great sea-fight off Miletus, the roof of a public school had fallen on the heads of the children of the principal citizens, and only one had escaped out of a hundred and twenty. In 1821 Europe was roused to sympathy for Greece by the horrors which this very island (Scio) suffered from the troops of the Capudan Pasha. After a time the policy of the Persians changed to¬ wards Ionia, probably because Darius disapproved of the excessive severity which had been exercised ; and Mar- donius, his son-in-law, a young noble of great promise, was sent to depose once more the “ tyrants,” and estab¬ lish democracies. These rulers had proved that they were not to be trusted. Having settled this business to the king’s satisfaction, he was appointed to the command of a fleet and army whose destination was Athens and Eretria—for Darius had never forgotten their offence in the burning of Sardis. But the ulterior object of the expedition was the subjugation of all Greece. As the Persian fleet was doubling Mount Athos, a north wind sprang up which terribly shattered it. Little short of three hundred wrecks and twenty thousand corpses were cast away on the rocky pro¬ montory. Many fell victims, says Herodotus, to sea- monsters—one of the additional perils of the deep in the imagination of ancient mariners; those who could 12G THE HISTORY OF HERODOTUS. not swim wore drowned—and those who could, died of cold. Mardonius himself received a wound in an action on the mainland of Thrace, and the expedition returned home with its commander in¬ valided. Darius immediately made fresh prepara¬ tions, and sent heralds to all the Greek states to de¬ mand earth and water, in order that lie might know what support to expect. It is to he hoped that the Athenians and Spartans did not disgrace them¬ selves by throwing one of the heralds into a well and the other into a pit, and telling them to fetch earth and water thence; but such is the story. Darius himself would under no provocation have so forgotten his knighthood. Some years afterwards, the Spartans were said to have sent two of their citizens, who voluntarily offered themselves, to Susa, as an atone¬ ment for this outrage, for which they believed that the wrath of the hero Talthybius, the patron of heralds, lay heavy on them; but Xerxes, who was then king, would not accept the sacrifice, and dismissed them unhurt. The ^Eginetans gave the earth and water to Darius, probably to spite the Athenians, who at once denounced them to the Spartans (who were as yet considered the leaders of Greece) as traitors to the national cause. The Spartan king Cleomenes went to iEgina to arrest the most guilty parties; but his mission there was foiled b}” his brother-king Demaratus, who was accusing him at home. In retaliation, Cleomenes attempted to prove that Demaratus was illegitimate. His mother was the loveliest woman in Sparta. She had been ugly in her childhood, but was changed into a beauty by her nurse taking her daily to the temple of Helen. TO XT A. 127 There a mysterious lady—“tall as the gods, and most divinely fair”—one day laid her hand on the child, whose looks from that time forth began to amend. In due time she had been married to a noble Spartan ; but Ariston the king fell in love with her, and got her from her husband, who was his greatest friend, by a ruse. Tie proposed to exchange their most precious posses¬ sions, and they ratified the compact by an oath. Ariston straightway demanded his friend’s wife. Thus taken off his guard, and bound by his oath, the hus¬ band unwillingly resigned her. But from circumstances connected with the birth of the child Demaratus, he was supposed by some to be not the son of Ariston, but of her former husband. Cleomenes found a powerful ally in Leotychides, the next heir, who was a deadly enemy of Demaratus, and the suit was carried on in his name. The inevitable oracle of Delphi was the last court of appeal; and the priestess, being bribed by Cleomenes, pronounced against Demaratus, who was then deposed, and ultimately driven from Sparta by the taunts of Leotychides. He made his way to that paradise of refugees, the hospitable court of Darius, who gave him lands and cities. He had stood very high in the estimation of his countrymen, as having been the only Spartan who had won the four-horse chariot-race at Olympia. When Cleomenes had thus worked his will on Dem¬ aratus, he took Leotychides, his new associate on the throne, with him to Angina, where he arrested two of the principal citizens, as guilty of treason against the liberty of Greece, and deposited them as hostages with their bitter enemies the Athenians. But bis own end was near. Humour accused him of underhand practices 128 THE HISTORY OF HERODOTUS. against Demaratus, and lie fled into Arcadia, where he "began to hatch a conspiracy against Sparta. The Spar¬ tans in alarm called him home to his former honours. He had always been eccentric; lie now became a maniac. He would dash his staff in the face of every citizen he met. At last his friends put him in the stocks—a wholesome instrument of restraint, as common there as in our own country within the last century. Find¬ ing himself alone one day with his keeper, he asked for a knife. The Helot did not dare to refuse the king, though a prisoner. Then he committed suicide in a manner which, though effected more clumsily, resembled the “Happy Despatch” of the Japanese. The madness of Cleoinenes, like that of Cambyses, was generally supposed to have been a judgment on his impiety. Herodotus thought his treatment of Demaratus enough to account for it; but other charges equally grave were brought against him. He had bribed the Pythian priestess. He had roasted alive some fifty Argives who had taken refuge in a sacred grove, during his invasion of Argolis, by burning the grove itself. He had scourged Argive priests for not allowing him, a foreigner, to sacrifice in the temple of .7 uno. He had been in the habit of entering forbidden temples, and generally of making a parade of reckless irreligion. dhe Spartans themselves, however, gave a more naturalistic account of the cause of his madness. Certain Scythian ambassadors, who were staying at Sparta to negotiate a league against Darius, had in¬ duced the king to adopt the habit of taking his wine without water like themselves. “ To drink like a Scythian” was a proverb. The case of Cambyses, as we have seen, admitted of the like explanation. 10 XI A. 129 When Cleomenes was dead, the AEginetans sent to Sparta to complain of Leotychides about their hostages, who were still in custody with the Athenians. Leo¬ tychides, who was not popular, narrowly escaped being given up as a hostage in their stead; but, in the end, he was duly sent to Athens to demand their release. The Athenians refused to give them up, saying that as two kings had placed them there, they could not give them up to one. They certainly would have had the English law of trusteeship on tlieir side. Leo¬ tychides, however, read them a striking lesson on the sacredness of trusts. He told them how one Glaucus, a Spartan, had once consulted the oracle at Delphi as to restoring a deposit of money to its rightful owner. He had the audacity to ask whether he might venture to purge himself by an oath, according to the Greek law, and so keep the money. The Pythoness gave answer in these warning words :— “ 0 Glaucus, gold is good to win, And a false oath is easy sin ; Swear—an thou wilt: death follows both The righteous and unrighteous oath : But Perjury breeds an awful Birth, That hath no name in heaven or earth ; Strong without hands, swift without feet, It tracks the pathway of deceit— Sweeps its whole household from the land; Only the just man’s house shall stand.” When Glaucus heard these words, he at once restored the money, and sent to beg of the god that the thought $f his heart might be forgiven him. The oracle re¬ plied that to tempt heaven with such a question was as bad as to commit the sin. “ And now/’ said the a. c. vol. iii. l 130 THE HISTORY OF HERODOTUS . Spartan king, “ mark my words, men of Athens; at this day there is none of Glaucus’ race left in Sparta * they have perished, root and branch.” The Athenians, however, turned a deaf ear to the solemn monition. In return for their stubbornness, the iEginetans laid wait for and captured the Sacred Galley which carried the Athenian embassy to Delos periodically, and threw the envoys (men of the high¬ est rank) into prison. A fierce war of reprisals was entered upon, of which perhaps the most remarkable characteristic is the poverty of the Athenians of the period in ships. They were obliged to beg twenty galleys of their friends the Corinthians, who, as it was against the law to give them, generously sold the whole for a hundred drachmae—about five francs apiece. Leotychides might have served to point the moral of his own remarkable anecdote. He reaped little happiness from the successful plot by which he had supplanted Demaratus. After seeing his only son die before him, he ended his own days in exile, having been banished from Sparta for the disgraceful crime of taking bribes from the enemy during a war with the Thessa¬ lians. The evident satisfaction with which Herodotus, here as elsewhere, traces the course of retributive jus¬ tice, is highly characteristic of the historian. CHAPTER IX. MARATHON. “ The flying Mede, his shaftless broken bow! The fiery Greek, his red pursuing spear ! Mountains above. Earth’s, Ocean’s plain below ! Such was the scene.” —Byron, “Childe Harold.” As the first expedition against Greece under Mardonius had ended in disaster, Darius thought it best to let the young commander gain experience before he was in¬ trusted with the conduct of another ; possibly, also, his wound was long in healing. The second armada was put under the command of Datis, a Mede of mature years, and Artaphemes, nephew of the king. They had express orders to bring the Athenians and Eretrians into the royal presence in chains. The whole flotilla -six hundred war-ships, besides transports—struck straight across sea, through the Archipelago, not caring again to tempt the dangers of Athos. After sack¬ ing Naxos, they came to the sacred island of Delos, the birthplace of the twin deities Apollo and Diana. Fortunately for the inhabitants, the senior commander was a Median ritualist, not an iconoclast like Cam- byses, and the sacred island was more than spared. 132 THE HISTORY OF HERODOTUS. Herodotus mentions an earthquake as occurring soon after this visit, and Thucydides another ; and the story of the island having once floated about at large, before it became fixed, is doubtless connected 'with its volcanic origin. The Persian armament swept like a blight through the other islands, and soon appeared off the coast of Euboea. Meeting with no resistance on landing, they disembarked their cavalry, and laid siege to Eretria, which was betrayed to them after six days of severe fighting. The town was burnt and sacked, and the inhabitants carried away captive. They expected from the threats of Darius the worst of fates; but when they reached Susa, that forgiving monarch settled them peaceably at a place called Ardericca, where there was a famous well which produced salt, bitumen, and petroleum. Herodotus saw them there, and mentions particularly that they had not forgotten their Greek. The Athenians, after the fall of Eretria, must have- felt much as the Jews did when Sennacherib appeared before their walls, and Pabshakeh boasted that all the kings and gods on his march had fallen before him. But when they heard that the Persians had actually disembarked at Marathon, they must have felt as England would have felt had the news come that Buonaparte had landed in Pevensey Bay, close to the ominous field of Hastings. For Marathon had not as yet become a synonym for Victory; on the contrary, Pisistratus had beaten the Athenian commons on that plain, and his son Hippias was now with the Persian host in a temper which, they might be sure, nad not improved with old age, exile, and disappoint¬ ment. MA RA THON. 133 It was Hippias who, from old association, and thinking the plain well suited for cavalry manoeuvres, had guided the Persians to the strand of Marathon (now Vrana). The plain itself is shaped somewhat like a thin crescent, the sea washing its concavity, and mountains rising behind its convex rim, which opens out at the back into two valleys. Between both a spur runs out, commanding the two gaps. The slope of this spur was the key of the Athenian position. The extent of level ground is about six miles long, as mea¬ sured by the curve of the bay, and about a mile and a half broad. But although along the whole of the six miles there is a fine sandy beach for landing, behind it, a considerable part—more than a third—of the crescent- plain is occupied by two swamps, one of which is of considerable extent. Here the Persian army awaited the mustering of the Athenians. Why they did not push on at once into the country is a mystery. It so chanced that, just before the Persians came, a heaven-sent commander dropped, as it were, from the clouds into the fortunate city of Athens. Tho spirits of men rose when it was rumoured that Mil- tiades, the son of Cimon, had come home. Herod¬ otus gives us his family history, which was curious enough. The Chersonese is a tongue of land jutting into the sea from the Thracian mainland. Its people being annoyed by the incursions of some savages to the north, as the Britons were by the Piets and Scots, sent a deputation to the oracle at Delphi to ask for advice. The god told them to choose as king the first man who should welcome them to his house. For some time they traversed almost hopelessly various parts 134 THE HISTORY OF HERODOTUS. of Gieeoe; but Greek respectability was not likely to invite into its sanctuary a party of strangers “dressed in outlandish garments, and carrying long spears in their hands.” At last in Attica they passed by the countryhouse of one Miltiades, son of Cypselus (a de¬ scendant of the hero of the “ meal-bin ”) A The demo¬ cratic Tyranny had deprived him of occupation, for he was a nobleman of the old school, who came of “ a four-horse family,” says our historian—had won, indeed, tiie great Olympic race himself—who traced his pedi¬ gree back to Ajax, and was connected with the proud Isagorids. So he sat idle in his porch, heartily sick of Pisistratus and democratic respectability. Seeing the •foreign wayfarers pass, out of mere curiosity, as it would seem, he invited them into his house and entertained them. The interview was satisfactory ; Miltiades con¬ sented to take out a few colonists with them to their wilds, and be their king. The first thing he did was to build them a kind of Hadrian’s wall to keep back their Piets and Scots. His nephew, Stesagoras, the son of Cimon, succeeded him, and was succeeded, on his violent death, by his brother, this second Miltiades, who came out from Athens, and made himself by a coup d'etat despot of the whole Chersonese—a great sin in the eyes of his democratic countrymen, who brought him to trial for it when he came to Athens, but con¬ doned it on account of his services to the state. When the Persians, in their march of vengeance after the Ionian revolt, came to the Hellespont, he ran the gaunt¬ let of their fleet successfully with five galleys; but lie left in their hands one ship, on board of which was his son As Miltia les had advised the king’s bridge * See p. 103. M A RA Til OX. 135 over the Danube to be destroyed, his captors thought, when they sent the youth to Darius, that he would punish the father in his person; but, with his usual magnanimity, the king gave him a house and estate, and a Persian wife, by whom he became the founder of a Persian family. Miltiades, immediately on his return to Athens, was impeached by his democratic enemies for “ tyranny ” in his colony; but, having cleared his character, he was at once appointed one of the ten Athenian generals, of whom Callimachus, the polemarch, or minister of war, was another. They could not have been much more than colonels, except on the days when they held the command in rotation; an arrangement which, to our English notions, would be fatal to the success of any great enterprise. The Athenians were as fond of deci¬ mals as the Persians of the number seven. A tradi¬ tional 10,000 Athenians were engaged on the Greek side at Marathon. But the Greeks were apt to under¬ estimate their own numbers and exaggerate those of the enemy. Supposing the Persian force to amount in all to 200,000 men, making deductions for the guard of the ships and the absent cavalry, they probably brought not many more than 110,000 into the field, of whom 30,000 were heavy armed. The Athenian light armed must also be reckoned, and if their whole force is put at 18,000, with 2000 Plataeans, the odds still leave abundant room for Hellenic self-glorification. Before the Athenians left their city, they had sent to Sparta for succour. Their courier is said to have reached Sparta on foot—a distance of 140 English miles—on the second day. But the Spartans had an inveterate superstition against marching until the 13G THE HISTORY OF HERODOTUS. moon was full. They were possibly in no great hurry to help Athens, as, when they did come, it was too late, and only with two thousand men. The Athen¬ ians had already drawn up their line of battle in the sacred close cf Hercules, at Marathon, when they were joined by the Platseans. The Plataeans had suffered much in time past from their neighbours the Thebans, and in return for substantial protection had bound themselves to Athens; in fact the little state became a satellite of the greater. The Greek forces seem to have occupied the space between Mount Kotroni and Argaliki, resting their wings against the heights, which prevented their being outflanked. There was hesitation as to beginning the attack. On the one hand, the Athenians rested on their own supplies, and could take their time 5 and the Spartan contingent, though tardy, might be expected to march in six days, when the moon would be at the full. On the other hand, treachery was feared from the party of Hippias in Athens, if there was any delay. The generals were equally divided, but Miltiades was for immediate action, and persuaded Callimachus to give his casting-vote with him. By what arrangement it happened is not clear, but it is certain that when, the day for action came, the command was in the hands of Miltiades. Why the attack was made on the particular day it is difficult to determine. Some suppose that Miltiades, with an inspiration like that of Wellington at Sala¬ manca, saw his advantage in a temporary absence of the Persian cavalry. Certain it is that no cavalry are heard of in the action, which seems singular, as Hippias is said to have chosen the spot for their bene* MARA TIIOX. 137 fit.* The armies stood fronting each other. Callima¬ chus was on the right wing, and the Platseans on the left. The right was always the post of honour and of danger, because the last man had his side unprotected by a shield. When the Greek line was formed, it appeared too short as compared with that of the Persians ; so Miltiades, no doubt with some misgivings, drew troops from his centre and massed them on the wings, in order that they might deploy when they cam-ed|^o^th^feMerL There was nearly a mile of ground to l?e, cleared pentre arriving at the enemy’s line; ai^k'it was advisable to lose as few men as possible from arrows before coming to the thrust of spears. Miltiades therefore gave the signal to charge at quick step, which was increased to a run when within ravage. The Persians, on their side, prepared to give them a warm recep¬ tion, though they thought the Gre^r^iac ing so wildly, unsupported by archers they had scarcely time for admiration of their enemies before they were in upon them. The two armies wrestled long and desperately before advantage de¬ clared itself for either. At last the swaying line of combat parted into three fragments, which moved in different directions. In the centre, where the Persians and Sacae were posted, the Athenians were rolled back, probably no farther than the slope of Kotroni, where they could stand at bay, though Herodotus says they were pursued up the valley. On the wings they were * Mr Blakesley thinks that they had not yet been disem¬ barked, but were still at Eretria ; and perhaps it was for this reason that the Persians kept their position close to the shore for so long a time, and did not attempt to outflank by the hills an enemy numerically so inferior. 138 THE HISTORY OF HERODOTUS. victorious; and the allies of the Persians who were there, retiring creditably enough, with their faces to the enemy, did not see the marshes behind them, but floun¬ dered into them backwards.. There was struggling to regain a footing, and general confusion, of which the Greeks took advantage, and pressed them harder till they were hopelessly broken and discomfited. But the victorious wings now perceived that their own centre was dislocated from them, and had lost ground before the elite of the Persian army; they therefore faced about and fell on their flanks. The Persian centre, now engaged on three sides, at last gave way likewise, and fell back in the direction of their galleys. Covered probably by the archers from the decks, most of the troops got safe on board. Then the Greeks raised a yell of disappointment, called for fire to burn the ships, and many rushed into the water to try to board them. One of the foremost of these was Cynegeirus, brother to the poet iEschylus; but as he grasped the stern-ornament of a trireme, he dropt back with both his hands chopped off. Some say that he main¬ tained his hold until he lost first one hand, then the other, and lastly his head, as he caught the gunwale with his teeth. So ended the immortal battle of Marathon, which stands almost alone by the side of Morgarten among the miracles achieved by the inspiration of Freedom. The Persians were sufficiently beaten, but their rout could hardly have been so complete as Herodotus de¬ scribes, since they had not far to run. They lost six thousand four hundred men, mostly in the swamps, and seven galleys, held back by main force or carried by boarding. It was in the fight at the ships that, besides MARA THON. 139 Cynegeirus, many Athenians of note fell, amongst them two of the generals, one of whom was Callimachus. The Athenians lost one hundred and ninety-two men in the action. As the greater number are said to have fallen in the attack on the ships, either those who gave way before the Persians anti Sacse were few, or they only suffered a partial repulse. Greek armies, from their formation in compact phalanx, seldom lost many men until they were broken, when their long spears and heavy armament rendered them more defenceless than lighter troops. Marathon afterwards became a household word at Athens, as Waterloo with us. A “ man who had fought at Marathon ” had a patent of popular nobility. Athenian orators made it a favourite commonplace; and Athenian satirists found it an in¬ exhaustible fund of jest upon the national vanity. W on- derful stories were related in connection with the battle. On the return of Pheidippides the courier from Sparta, he said that as he was crossing a mountain in Arcadia he was accosted by the wood-god Pan, who called to him by name, and complained of his worship being neglected by the Athenians, while he was always well disposed towards them. In consequence, a temple was dedicated to Pan under the Acropolis, and he was honoured with annual sacrifices and a torch-race. National heroes were supposed to have been present, and to have assisted in the fight; and one Athenian was suddenly struck blind in the thick of the fray by (as he declared) the passing before his eyes of a super¬ natural giant, who slew the man at his side. When the Persians had re - embarked, their fleet doubled Cape Sunium, and made a demonstration in the direction of the harbour of Athens, with the hope HO THE HISTORY OF HERODOTUS. of surprising the city; "but the Athenians returned in time to cover it. There was an ugly rumour, which Herodotus entirely disbelieves, that a shield was hoisted on the walls as a telegraphic signal by the Alcmaeonids. This, doubtless, emanated from the opposite faction; for the Isagorids and Alcmaeonids of Athens hated each other as cordially, and slandered each other as unscrupulously, as the English Tories and Whigs of the time of Queen Anne. The tale of the subsequent fate of Miltiades is one of the most painful passages in history. In the first flush of his popularity, he asked the Athenians to give him seventy ships fully equipped, only deigning to tell them that he would get them gold in abundance. They asked no questions, but gave him the fleet. He had a private grudge against the people of Paros, and he now sailed to the island of marble, and laid siege to its town. His patience began to be at an end, when a certain priestess offered to forward his views. In leaping the wall of the sacred precincts after an inter¬ view with her, he dislocated his thigh. He then returned to Athens disabled, and as soon as he arrived was put upon his trial on the capital charge of having deceived the state, his accuser being Xanthippus, father of the great Pericles. The crippled hero lay on a couch in court while his friends defended him. They could not say a word in extenuation of the Parian escapade, but rested his defence on the fact that he had saved Athens at Marathon, and regained Lemnos. But, unfortunately for Miltiades, this was not the first time that he had had to appear on a charge of like nature. It seemed as if he wished to make himself despot of Paros — perhaps even despot of MARA THON’. 141 Athens—as he had made himself despot of the Cher¬ sonese. It was not for this that they had got rid of Hippias. If he commanded well at Marathon, so did the other generals, two of them now no more; nay, every man who fought in those ranks seemed as good a hero as he, for Marathon, like Inkermann, was a “ sol¬ dier’s battle.” If he took Lemnos, he had missed taking Paros, and wasted the public money at a time when the treasury was low. They had not the heart to condemn him to death, for as he lay before them be seemed to bear death’s mark already—and, indeed, it must have appeared to them as impossible as for the king of Italy to punish Garibaldi for treason after his wound at Aspromonte; but they condemned him in the expenses of the abortive expedition, amounting to fifty talents (above .£12,000). As his son Cimon was able to pay these heavy damages, his judges seem to have had no intention of absolutely ruining him. Soon afterwards, physical mortification in the injured limb, assisted no doubt by mental, put an untimely end to the days of the Man of Marathon. CHAPTER X, THERMOPYLAE. ct Singing of men that in battle array, Ready in heart and ready in hand, March with banner, and bugle, and fife. To the death, for their native land.” —Tennyson, “ Ma id.” After the terrible defeat of his best generals at Mara¬ thon, Darius thought the Athenians worth his personal attention. That battle took place in the autumn ol B.c. 490 \ and the king occupied the next three years in preparations for a new expedition, which he in¬ tended to lead in person. But a revolt in Egypt divided his attention; and he was considering in which direc¬ tion he was most wanted, when he was summoned from the scene by a mightier monarch than himself, after a reign of six-and-thirty years. His fourth son, Xerxes, succeeded him—not his first-born, Artabazanes; because Xerxes had been born in the purple, and of a daughter of Cyrus; whereas the elder sons had been b(trn when Darius was a subject, and of the daughter of a subject. Xerxes soon disposed of the Egyptian revolt, and left his brother Achaemenes satrap of the country. Then he took up the great quarrel bequeathed TRERMOPYL M. 143 him by his father, hut after many hesitations and vacillations, signified in the narrative of Herodotus by dreams and their interpretations, and opposite opinions said to have been given by Artabanus, who dissuaded, and Mardonius, who was in favour of an invasion. The young king was evidently afraid of compromising his newly - inherited pros¬ perity. He was of a luxurious character, not crav¬ ing, like Darius, for barren honour; and if he left the Greeks alone, it would be a long time before they found their w'ay to Susa. When the bolder counsels at last prevailed, he resolved to make matters as safe as possible. Grecian liberty was not to be stabbed, but stifled, to death. He would pour out all Asia upon it. So he took four good years in preparation, gather¬ ing a host of armed, half-armed, and almost unarmed men, such as has hardly been seen before or since. The soldiers, with the exception of the select few, carried the rudest national weapons—bows and arrows, pole¬ axes, “ morning-stars,” even staves and lassoes. Some rate the host as high as five millions; others give less than half that number. The men were measured, like dry goods—not counted; that is, a pen was made which could hold ten thousand, through which the whole army passed in successive batches. It is time, perhaps, that a common error should be exploded, into which, however, it would be impossible for any atten¬ tive reader of Herodotus to fall. No schoolboy be lieves now, as elderly men did when they were boys, that the French are a nation of cowards. But it is possible for careless readers of Greek history tc believe that the Persians were cowards; else, they might say, how should they have been beaten by 144 THE HISTORY OF HERODOTUS . so small a number of Greeks? And were they not obliged to flog their soldiers into action? Perhaps this was only a Greek version of the fact that corporal punishment was an institution in their army. Amongst the Greeks it was confined to slaves. The lash has not prevented Russians and Austrians—not to mention others—from fighting well. Perhaps the native Per¬ sians, especially those of noble birth, were personally braver than the Greeks. But the Greeks had the im¬ mense advantage of discipline. In a disciplined army every man has the eyes of his comrades on him, and if fear is felt, it cannot act for very shame, and because it is counteracted by mechanical obedience. Aristotle assigns a special kind of courage to national militias, which all Greek armies were, which he calls the political courage, springing from the feeling of what is due from the individual to the community. This may not be cour¬ age of the most romantic kind, but it appears to answer its end perfectly; and Nelson thought it good enough to appeal to in his famous watchword, still written round the wheel of our war-ships—“ England expects every man to do his duty.” This kind of courage culminated in Leonidas. The Persian officers were even desperately brave, and always led the charges in person, which accounts for their great relative loss in battles. The Greek officers took their chance with the rest, being indistinguishable from the privates in the phalanx. Again, the numbers of their armies were a positive dis¬ advantage to the Persians; for most of their auxiliary troops, when brought into contact with real soldiers, were as sheep brought to the shambles. The Greeks were also more efficiently armed. The Persian infantry were archers, carrying also pikes and daggers, who (like THERMOPYLAE. 14b tlie English crossbow-man with his pavoise-hearer in the fifteenth century) made a bulwark of their great oblong wicker shields, as may be seen now in the Nim- rud sculptures, and shot from behind them. But when this bulwark was once forced, the Persians had no pro¬ tection but their light armour against the strong pikes of the Greeks. Our archers turned the scale of battle against superior forces at Cressy and Poitiers, because they were the only body which had at all the character cf regular troops. The Persian officers had in some respects become luxurious and effeminate even in the time of Darius, riding in palanquins, keeping sumpter-camels, and so forth ; but they do not appear to have been worse than our Anglo-Indians, who have never been reckoned defi¬ cient in valour. The French mousquetaires , who fought under Marshal Saxe, were as celebrated for their foppery as their gallantry in the field. “ Hold hard—the dandies are coming !” was the word passed from one British soldier to another, when their laced coats and three- cornered hats came in sight. There is no need to follow in detail all the pomp and circumstance of the slow march of Xerxes into Greece. The vast army crossed from Abydos to Sestos by a double pontoon bridge; and Xerxes, like the spoiled child of the harem, is said to have ordered the Hellespont to be scourged, and chains to be thrown into it, and branding-irons to be plunged into the hissing water, because a storm had destroyed the work when first attempted. He is also said to have cut in halves the eldest son of a wealthy Lydian, who had made him an offer of all his property, but requested that one of his sons might be left behind; making his troops defil« a. c. vol. iii. k MG THE HISTORY OF HERODOTUS. between the severed portions, by way of raising theii enthusiasm. A similar story is told of Darius, which appears, in his case, incredible. The great interest of the expedition begins when it arrived where resistance might be expected from the Greeks. The land-force which marched round the coast was accompanied by more than twelve hundred war-galleys, besides a multi¬ tude of other craft. The navy passed through a new- made ship-canal, by which the voyage round the for¬ midable headland of Athos was avoided. Our author says the work was done in mere bravado, since the skips might have been drawn across the narrow neck of land with less labour and cost. It is remarkable, in the cutting of this canal (a work of three years, the traces of which are still distinctly visible), that all the other nations were senseless enough to make its sides perpendicular, which, from the continual landslips, gave them double trouble ; while the Phoenicians alone proved themslves as good “navvies” as navigators, by making their cutting twice as broad at top as at bottom. The news of the approach of this overwhelming host struck the Greeks with consternation, and all the northern tribes, including the Thebans, submitted to the invader. The Athenians were alarmed by dark oracles pointing apparently to their extermination, but con¬ taining one saving clause, that they might find safety in their “ wooden walls.” They wisely interpreted this to mean their ships. Their troublesome war with the AEginetans proved now an advantage, as it had forced them to make'large additions to their navy, the former poverty of which has been mentioned. Envoys were sent for aid to Argos, Sicily, Coreyra, and Crete. The Argives might be well excused for declining, as Cleo THERMOPYLAE. 147 menes had just massacred six thousand out of their not probably more than ten thousand citizens. Gelon, the king of Syracuse, would have assisted, had not Sicily been just then invaded by a miscellaneous army of threo hundred thousand men under the command of the Car¬ thaginian Hamilcar, possibly induced, through the Phoe¬ nicians, to make this diversion in favour of Xerxes. Gelon had the good fortune to destroy this host in the decisive battle of Himera, on the same day as the Greek victory at Salamis. The Corcyraeans temporised, with their historical selfishness ; the Cretans excused them¬ selves on the faith of an oracle ; so the Greeks proper were left to face their terrible enemy alone, and even among them there were many craven spirits who took the side of the Persian. Thessaly, through which the course of the invaders lay, is a basin of mountains, like Bohemia, cracked by the gorge of the Peneus, as Bohemia is by that of the Elbe. This basin was doubtless, as Herodo¬ tus says, once a lake, until it was tapped by some convulsion of nature. Xerxes thought flooding the country quite feasible, by damming up the outlet of the river: no such measure, however, was necessary. At first the Greeks had intended to make their stand there, in the Yale of Tempe, celebrated for its beauty. Over¬ hung by plane-woods, the high elilfs are festooned with creepers, and diversified with underwood, approach¬ ing here and there so closely as to leave barely room for the road and river. But they gave up this position when they found that Thessaly could easily be entered by another road over the mountains. They drew back towards the isthmus: and Thessaly at once made terms with the Persian king. THE HISTORY OF HERODOTUS. 1 4:3 It was now decided to make the first stand at the narrow pass of Thermopylae (Hotwells-Gate), tlie key of Greece itself. The river Spercheius has since established a tract of alluvial deposit between the mountain and the sea, but the hot springs are still there, in pools of clear water, and the other features of the scene remain much as they were in the time of Herodotus. The pass leads along the shore from Thessaly to Locris. The Grecian fleet were to support the army in the narrow strait by Artemisium, on the head of Euboea (Xegropont). As the Persian host rolled on, it had increased like a snowball, imbib¬ ing the contingents of all the districts that sub¬ mitted. But the elements were still against the invaders. A storm arose when their fleet was off Mag¬ nesia, attributed by the Athenians to the intervention of Boreas (the 1STorth Wind), who had married a daugh¬ ter of their mythical king Ereclitlieus. At least four hundred galleys perished, and so much wealth was cast ashore that the wreckers on the coast became rich men ; and the Persians soon after lost fifteen ships more, which mistook the enemy’s fleet for their own. Xerxes was himself with the land-force, which had now oc¬ cupied the territory of Trachis, north of the pass of Thermopylae. The little Greek army had posted itself behind an ancient wall, which barred the pass, and which they had repaired, at a spot where there was only room for a single chariot-road. The nucleus of the force (in all under 8000 of all arms) was three hundred tliorough-hred Spartans, each attended by his seven Helots. They were all fathers of families, who had left sons at Lome to succeed them. At their head was Leonidas, now senior king of Sparta. This THERMOPYLAE. 149 small force was expected to "be able to hold the pass until the rest were disengaged ; for the Spartans were keeping a local feast, and the other Greeks were en¬ gaged at the great Olympian festival. Perhaps the very extremity of the danger made the Greeks put their re¬ ligious duties in the foreground; and, indeed, Leonidas and his men went out as to an expected sacrifice. A Persian scout reported to Xerxes that he found the Spartans busy dressing their hair. In surprise the king appealed for explanation to his refugee guest Demaratus, the banished king of Sparta, whom he had brought to Greece in his train. The Spartan warned him that it betokened, on the part of his countrymen, a resistance to the death. Usually care¬ less of their dress, there was one occasion when they polished their arms, combed their long hair and wreathed it with flowers, and put on scarlet vests; it was when they expected a battle which they might not survive. Xerxes waited four days to see if they would retire, and then ordered his Medes and Cissians to bring them to him in chains. For a whole day these made repeated attacks, and were as often re¬ pulsed with heavy loss. The Persian “ Immortals ” were then launched at them, and fared no better. These troops were so called because they were always kept up to the exact number of ten thousand,* and re¬ presented the Imperial Guard. Often pretending flight, so as to draw them on in loose pursuit, the Greeks turned on their enemies and butchered them. Oi.e would have thought that this affair in the front would have made little impression on that dense host; but * The forty members of the French Academy are so nick' named for the same reason. 150 THE HISTORY OF HERODOTUS. Xerxes is said to have leapt thrice from his throne as the wave of disturbance reached him, fearing for his whole army. On the third day a native guide came and t>ld the king of a pass over the mountains, by. which the Greeks might be taken in rear, and he selected Hydarnes, the commander of the Immortals, for this important service. The crest of this pass (the existence of which, the Greeks had learned too late) was watched on their behalf by a thousand Phocians, who w r ere warned by hearing the rustling of the dry leaves of the oak-wood, but thinking an attack on their own post was intended, retired to a more defens¬ ible position, and let Hydarnes pass on. The way in which the little band of heroes received the announce¬ ment that their position had been turned should be told in Herodotus's own words :— “ First, the soothsayer Megistias, as he inspected the sacrifices, warned them of the death which awaited them with the morrow’s dawn. Then came some deserters, who told them of the march of the Persians round the hill. All this was while it w T as still night. Then, when the day had broken, their scouts came running down from the heights with the same news. Thereupon the Greeks took counsel, and their opinions were divided : for some would not hear of quitting their post, while others advised to do so. Then they parted asunder, and some went off and dispersed each to their own cities, and some prepared to remain there with Leonidas. It is even said that Leonidas himself sent them away, anxious that they should not be slain : but for himself and the Spartans who were there, it ■was not seemly, he said, for them to leave a post which they had once undertaken to keep.” THERMOPYLAE. 151 Those who chose the nobler alternative, besides the Spartans and their Laconian subjects and Helot slaves, who could not help themselves, were seven hundred Thespians and four hundred Thebans—the latter, our author says, detained as hostages, but probably proscribed at home for refusing to submit, like the rest, to Xerxes. The struggle now could have but one issue. Xerxes ordered a general attack at daybreak, and Leonidas, in order to sell the lives of his men as dearly as possible, ordered them to advance from the defile itself, and attack in the open. The Persians perished in crowds—some driven into the sea, some trampled to death by their comrades, others urged forward by stripes only to fall on the deadly lances of the Greeks. Dead weight, however, began to tell against the latter, when they had broken their spears in bar¬ barian bodies, and had used .tlieir swords till they were weary. At last Leonidas fell, and over his body the struggle was renewed more furiously than ever. “ The dead around him on that day In a semicircle lay.” In that swathe of corpses were found two brothers of Xerxes. Four times the Greeks repulsed the enemy, and at last bore off the body of their king. They had but short breathing-space. Their hour was come, when the fatal troops of Hydarncs came covui the hills in their rear. The survivors drew back into the nar¬ rowest part of the pass, within the wall, and posted themselves on a hillock, where a stone lion afterwards marked the resting-place of Leonidas. So did the sur 152 THE HISTORY OF HERODOTUS vivors of the Khyber Pass massacre in 1841 draw together for a last stand on the hillock at Gundamuck, whence a single officer escaped to Peshawur to tell that the British army was exterminated. The four hundred Thebans saved themselves by a timely surrender; the remaining four thousand Greeks were buried in a hail-shower of missiles. Herodotus awards the palm of valour to a Spartan wit, who, when lie was told that the Persian arrows would darken the air, said, “ Then we shall have but a shadow-fight ” (or sliam-fight). Such a man would have appreciated the ghastly witticisms of the guillotine in the French Revolution. Xerxes, with an indecency towards the dead quite opposed to all Persian usage, had the head of Leonidas cut off, and fixed upon a pole. The Greek combined fleet was commanded by the Spartan Eurybiades. ‘ The Spartans would only co¬ operate on condition that the command should be theirs, though they only furnished ten ships, while the Athen¬ ians mustered one hundred and twenty-seven. Spar¬ tan provincialism forms a strong contrast to the national patriotism of the little state of Plataea, which threw itself heart and soul into the cause of Greek inde¬ pendence. Though landsmen, the Platseans helped to man the Athenian fleet. They were afterwards re¬ warded by vile ingratitude from Sparta, and lukewarm friendship from Athens. The whole naval strength counted two hundred and seventy-one three-banked galleys. The Persian dis¬ aster in Hie storm had now been balanced by a Greek disaster in the field ; and the barometer of Hel¬ lenic confidence fell again. There was even talk of THERMOPYLAE. 153 Leaving Euboea to its fate, ancl retreating southwards. Themistocles, the Athenian commander, was a man who had raised himself to a foremost position from small beginnings, which may account for his under¬ standing so w T ell the use and power of money. If Mammon was one of his gods, he could make him his servant for good as well as for evil. The Euboeans, alarmed for their families and goods, besought the Spartan admiral not to desert them; and finding him impracticable, applied to Themistocles—this time backing their prayers with a present of thirty talents. Themistocles knew Eurybiades better than they, and gave him five talents out of the thirty, as if they had come from himself, or from the treasury of the Athen¬ ians, and three more to Adeimantus the Corinthian, whose valour, among all the national commanders, seemed most strongly tempered with discretion. The rest of this secret-service money he kept for himself. The Persians, in great fear lest the Greek fleet should escape them under cover of night, detached two hun¬ dred ships, with orders to sail round outside Euboea, and back up the strait between the island and the mainland, and so block in the enemy. The battle—or rather battles, for there were three —of Artemisium began by desultory and provocative attacks on the part of the Greeks, Avho, when they had brought the whole Persian fleet upon them, rolled theirs up like a hedgehog or porcupine, with the spines outside. They drew their sterns all together, and formed a circle with their sharp beaks turned every way. In the first melee thirty ships were taken from the Persians. The battle lasted through the mid¬ summer evening, and then each fleet withdrew to its 154 THE HISTORY OF HERODOTUS. mooring. The sea was like oil, and that ominous calm udgneo. from which better sailors than the Greeks would have foretold storm. At midnight it thundered and lightened on Mount Pelion, the wind rose, and the wrecks and bodies were drifted to tire station of the Persian fleet, and struck the crews with dismay. But it fared worse with their detached division, which was utterly destroyed on the rocks on the outer coast of Bubcea. Thus did the good wind Boreas still seem to help his friends. A reinforcement of fifty-three fresh Athenian galleys came up at daybreak, having escaped the storm inside the island. The ancient wa' • ships, even the great “ five-bankers ” of the Romans ar i Carthaginians, could stand no more weather than a river - steam er ; while their great rounded Dutch-built merchant-ships would ride out a moderate gale fairly. On the afternoon of the second day the Greeks attacked again, and sank some Cilician vessels. On the third day about noon the Persians began the attack, while the Greeks kept their station at Artemisinin. There was much fouling among the Persians from their closelv- packed vessels, but they fought well, and neither side could claim much advantage. The Athenians gained most distinction among the allies ; and of the Athenians Cleinias, son of Alcibiades, and father of him of that name who afterwards was the representative Athenian of the new school. He had manned and equipped his trireme at his own expense. The Greeks remained masters of the field—that is, of the scene of action, with the bodies and wrecks; but as half the Athenian fleet had been more or less damaged, they decided on withdrawing southward, especially as they now heard of the loss of Thermopylae. Before he went, Tbemistocles THERMOPYLAE. 155 bad inscriptions graven on the rocks by all the water- ing-places, exhorting the Ionian Greeks now in the service of Persia to desert. If this had no effect on those to whom they were addressed, it would at any rate make them objects of suspicion to the Persians. Then the Greeks sailed away—the Corinthians first, the Athenians, as became them, last. While the Persian sailors and marines were wasting the north of Euboea, a herald came from Xerxes order¬ ing a day’s leave ashore to be given, that the crews might view the field of Thermopylae. On the Greek side were four thousand bodies in a heap, which the king pretended were all Spartans or Thespians; on his side lay about a thousand, scattered all over the field. The rest of the Persians had been carefully buried beforehand ; but the trick deceived nobody. The Persian army now advanced and ravaged Phocis, and on the farther frontier parted into two divisions, the larger entering the friendly territory of Bceotia, and making for Athens—the smaller proceeding to¬ wards Delphi. Xerxes was well instructed as to the wealth of Apollo’s temple, and must have known by heart all the costly offerings that Croesus had made. The Delphians in dismay consulted their oracle : the god replied that “he could protect his own.” Just when the enemy reached the ascent to the temple, a thunderstorm burst forth, and great rocks came rolling down the steep of Parnassus. The Persians fled, and the Delphians, assisted apparently by two supernatural warriors, emerged from their hiding-places and slew the hindermost. The priests of Apollo were doubtless adepts in the machinery of the stage. CHAPTER XL SALAMIS. *• The man of firm and righteous will. No rabble, clamorous for the wrong. No tyrant’s brow, whose frown may kill. Can shake the strength that makes him strong: Not winds, that chafe the sea they sway. Nor Jove’s right hand, with lightning red: Should Nature’s pillared frame give way. That wreck would strike one fearless head.” —Conington’s ‘ Horace.’ \ Such is tlie portrait of Themistocles, as drawn by Kaul- bach of Munich, in his great cartoon of the battle of Salamis. He stands at ease on the deck of his galley, sacrificing to the gods while the battle is ending. We feel that he would be as composed and dignified, only somewhat sadder, if the ruin were coming on him instead of on the enemy. The very self-seeking of this remarkable man in the midst of the most excit¬ ing circumstances bears testimony to the admirable balance of his nature. He somewhat resembles Marl¬ borough, of whom, for all his romantic courage, Macaulay too severely says, that in his youth he loved lucre more than wine or women, and in his middle age he loved lucre more than power or glory. But it SALA MIS. 157 must be remembered that Themistocles was a Greek, and the versatile Ulysses is the very type of a Greek hero. It was not in the Greek character to vie with Darius in his right royal disdain of petty advantage and private revenge. The Greeks would have made far better “ hucksters ” than that king, who Avas so called by his nobles because he was a good financier. And Themistocles w^as a first-rate example of the middle- class burgher, as “the curled Alcibiacles” was of the “ gilded youth ” of a cultivated Greek republic. He was Presence-of-mind incarnate. But he was honest withal—with the honesty of a good Jew with whom one might safely deposit millions, but who would not fail to make every shilling breed. And he was a patriot — one who would die for his country at any moment, but was far too sensible to believe in her or to trust her. The sequel of his life showed that he was right. Themistocles, though not the highest type of man, is perhaps the most perfect specimen of the Greek on record. The Athenians had hoped that the combined Greek forces would make a stand in Boeotia, but in this they were disappointed. The primary object of the Spartans was to take care of themselves; their secondary object to save Greece, that they might rule it. They wished the Athenians out of their way, but they felt that if the fire spread to them, it would be coming somewhat close to their 'own home. Could they not sacrilice Athens, and save the Athenians, who would then be their obedient servants'? So they withdrew their land-forces behind the Isthmus of Corinth, which they proceeded to fortify; while the combined fleet was in- 153 THE HISTORY OF HERODOTUS. duced, by the entreaties of the Athenians, to anchor cff the island of Salamis, to which most of the latter pro¬ ceeded to transfer for safety their families and goods. The Greeks had received reinforcements which made their fleet larger now than when it had fought at Artemisium. The Athenians now furnished one hundred and eighty of the three hundred and seventy- eight galleys. The I ersian army entered Athens only to find an empty city—none had remained in it but some of the very poorest, or a few obstinate heads who saw in the palisade of the citadel the “ wooden walls” of the oracle, and strengthened it with planks accordingly. The Persians encamped on the Areopagus (the Mars’ Kill of St Paul), and shot lighted arrows at the barri¬ cade, which was soon in flames. Put their storming- parties were foiled by a gallant defence, until a few soldiers scaled a place where no watch was kept, and were followed by others, who put the weak garrison to the sword. The temple of the goddess was plundered and burnt, and Xerxes sent a messenger home to Susa to announce that his vengeance was complete. The sacrifice of Athens was unavoidable, yet it greatly affected the. allies, who thought of withdrawing their fleet to the isthmus. But the Athenians felt that this step would almost certainly lead to its break¬ ing up. There was a long war of words between Themistocles, Eurvbiades, and Adeimantus. This last was insolent to the Athenian. “ You have no country now,” said he, and therefore no vote.” The¬ mistocles replied, that with two hundred well-manned ships the Athenians would find a country wherever they chose to land. At last the threat that the Athenians would all emigrate to Italy, and give up LA MIS. 159 the war, prevailed. And preparations were made foi battle. Tlie time was naturally one which abounded with portents and prodigies, which were generally inter¬ preted to the disadvantage of the enemy. It was the time of the year of the great procession in honour of Ceres and Bacchus from Eleusis to Athens. It could not be held how, in the presence of the enemy, but a chant was heard in the air, as from no mortal choir, and a column of dust was seen to rise, and spread into a heavy cloud which overshadowed the Persian armament. Some enthusiasts averred that they saw the heroes Ajax, Teucer, and Achilles, battling for their homesteads in Salamis and AEgina. Their images, at all events, were brought out to battle, for good-luck. The Spanish Carlists, when they appointed the image of Nostra Senorade los Dolores generalissimo of theirforces, went a step further; and this was in our remembrance. The Persian fleet had already lost six hundred and fifty ships, but Herodotus says that it had been rein¬ forced to the original number by the contingents from the islands and some maritime states—an assertion which seems hardly probable. At Phalerum, the har¬ bour of Athens, a council of war was held. The best head in the fleet of Xerxes was a woman’s—Artemisia, queen of Halicarnassus. This Amazon of the sea seemed almost a match for that goddess of War and Wisdom whom the Athenians worshipped. She al¬ ways appears a special favourite with her townsman Herodotus, who nevertheless is said to have found the tyranny of her family unendurable. She advised Xerxes to bide his time, and let the Greek confederacy fall to pieces from internal dissensions. But the 160 THE HISTORY OF HERODOTUS. party of action prevailed ; the land-forces marched on the isthmus, where Cleombrotus, brother of Leonidas, now commanded, and the fleet weighed anchor. The Sparfans and other Greeks within the Peninsula had meanwhile been working night and day, throw¬ ing up a wall of defence across the isthmus. Their panic communicated itself to the fleet, so that Themis- tocles was obliged at last to resort to a desperate strata¬ gem. He sent to the Persian commanders secretly, to tell them that he was a well-wisher of the king’s, and that the Greeks meditated flight. The Persians believed it, and made such arrangements of their forces, under cover of the night, as would effectually prevent the escape of their enemies. The Greek council of captains was still in fierce debate when the Athenian Aristides arrived from iEgina, where he was undergoing ostracism (he was said to have been banished because the people were tired of hearing him called “ the Just ”), and said that he had just succeeded in getting through the enemy, who had completely surrounded the Greeks. All now made up their minds for the inevitable fight, and the commanders addressed the crews—Tliemistocles, with the most powerful eloquence. But the enemy attacked so fiercely that the Greeks hacked water, til 1 Ameinias the Athenian, whose blood was hotter than that of the rest, darted forward and engaged an enemy’s ship The two became entangled, and others coming ip to their aid, the conflict became general. The Pei - dans themselves fought better than at Artemisinin, although they became involved in the same inextri¬ cable confusion, while the Greeks never allowed their line to be broken. The very circumstance that tho Persians were under the eye of their king, who over SAL AM IS. 1G1 looked the battle from a neighbouring promontory, told in one respect against them, since it caused those in the rear to press to the front, and thus get involved with their own retreating ships; so that a tangled ball of hulls, oars, and rigging, was formed, which the freely-moving Greeks could strike at and tear to pieces at their leisure. The vanquished showed in some instances great gal¬ lantry. The liege lady of Herodotus, Queen Artemisia, distinguished herself as much in the fight as in the council, but in a way of questionable morality. Being hard pressed by an Athenian galley, she turned on one belonging to her own allies, and sank it. The Athenian thought he must have made a mistake, and sheered off, while the unsuspecting Xerxes admired the good service his fair ally seemed to be doing. “ My men,” said he, “fight like women, and my women like men.” Such cool effrontery would have been unintelligible to a Persian. There was a petty king on board the galley which she had sunk; but drowned men tell no tales. A brother of the king, Ariabignes, the admiral, perished, and a vast number of noble Persians. The Greeks whose ships were sunk mostly saved themselves by swimming, while the Persians lost more drowned than killed in action. The fugitives tried to reach Phalerum, but there were iEginetans outside, who swooped on them like falcons. The stage-coward of the battles of Artemisium and Salanris is the unfortunate Adeimantus, who is accused of attempted flight. Why was Herodotus, usually so impartial, so spiteful against him and the Corinthians? He may have relied on Athenian information, or perhaps some general im¬ pression of Greek half-hearted ness must have come from Iialicarnassian or Ionian sources. H£schylus, a. c. voL iii. L 162 THE HISTORY OF HERODOTUS. in his magnificent tragedy of “ The Persians,” beside which the prose of Herodotus is tame, speaks of nothing but patriotic zeal, singing of paeans, and joyous alacrity. The hero of Waterloo is said to have modestly observed to some ladies who compli¬ mented him on a description of the battle, “ I ought to know all about it, for I was there myself.” So HCsohylus ought to be our best authority for the battle of Salamis, as he was present himself, probably in the ship of his brother Ameinias. According to him, it was the Persians who were caught in a trap by Themis- tocles : thinking the Greeks were in retreat, they had made their arrangements for chase and not for action, which rendered their discomfiture more easy; since not only did those who came up break their fighting order, but, as at Artemisium, they had detached a con¬ siderable squadron to block the entrance to the strait. The poet describes the chase as lasting till midnight, in the open sea, the Greeks destroying the helpless enemy “like fishermen harpooning in a shoal of tunny-fish.” All the shore of Attica was strewn with wrecks. “ Slow sinks, more lovely ere his race be run, Behind Morea’s hills the setting sun ; Not as in northern climes, obscurely bright, But one unclouded blaze of living light! O’er the hushed deep the yellow beam he throws, Gilds the green wave, that trembles as it glows. On old Angina’s rock, and Hydra’s isle, The god of gladness sheds his parting smile ; O’er his own regions lingering, loves to shine, Though there his altars are no more divine. Descending fast, the mountain-shadows kiss Thy glorious gulf, unconquered Salamis !”* * Byron—“ The Corsair.” SAL A MIS. 163 But never did the sun of Greece set on a scene su memorable, and so beautiful in one sense, in the midst of its terror, as on that autumn evening in the year 480 b.c. There was yet more to be done, but Greece and civilisation were safe. The destruction of the grand fleet necessitated the retreat of the heterogeneous multitude which called itself the grand army, for it depended on the fleet for most of its supplies. But it was hoped that a picked force might still succeed, and Xerxes left behind 300,000 troops under the command of Mardonius, who went into winter quarters in Thessaly, when he started homewards with all possible speed. This flight may have had State reasons for it, like that of Xapoleon from Russia, for the outlying provinces were always ready for insurrection; but, considering his character, the simple interpretation of his conduct appears the most probable, that he was thoroughly cowed. Themistocles wished to follow up the victory by hunting the fugitives from island to island, and then destroying the bridge of boats over the Helle¬ spont. When he was overruled by Eurybiades, he gave out that he had changed his mind, and sent a faithful slave to find Xerxes, and tell him that, out of personal goodwill to his majesty, Themistocles had prevented the Greeks from destroying the bridge. An unusually early winter, as in the Russian cam¬ paign of 1812, added to the sufferings of the retreat. According to the tragedian iEschylus, great numbers perished in attempting to cross the frozen Strymon, thus forestalling the Beresina disaster. The Helle¬ spont bridge had been broken up, not by the Greeks but by a storm; but there was no difficulty in 164 THE HISTORY OF HERODOTUS. ferrying across the miserable remnant in boats. At Abydos they came on supplies, and many who had survived starvation on grass and tree-bark died of sur¬ feit. One version of the account makes Xerxes leave his army on the Strymon, and take ship himself for Asia. A storm coming on, the ship was in such danger that the pilot declared that there was no chance of safety unless some of those on board would sacrifice themselves to lighten it, and appealed to the loyalty of the Persians, who accordingly leapt over¬ board. It is added that, on coming safely to land, the king presented the pilot with a golden crown for saving his own life, and then had him beheaded for caus¬ ing the death of so many of his gallant servants. The latter part looks like the repetition of an anecdote of Cambyses ; and indeed Herodotus scarcely believes the story, as he observes that the Persians might hav8 been sent below, and the Phoenician crew sacrificed. It did not seem to strike him that sailors are of more use in a storm than the best soldiers, and the self¬ devoting loyalty of the Persians to their monarch’s person is well known. The Greeks passed an anxious winter, for Mardonius remained in Thessaly, making his preparations for action in the spring. Their allied fleet, a hundred and ten strong, was persuaded to come as far as Delos by an embassy from Asia (one of whom was an Herodotus, possibly a relative of our author), who re¬ presented that the Greek colonies there were ripe for revolt. They were, however, deterred for the present from proceeding farther; possibly because a Lacedae¬ monian, naturally a landsman, was first in command. Mardonius in the mean time spent the winter in con- SA LAM IS. 165 suiting oracles, tlie answers of wliieli do not seem to have been particularly encouraging, as he afterwards resorted to the more statesmanlike measure of endeav¬ ouring to detach the Athenians from the Greek alli¬ ance. For this mission he selected Alexander, the son of Amyntas, prince of Macedon. The Spartans, hear¬ ing of it, sent ambassadors on their part to beseech them not to desert the cause of Greece. The Athe¬ nians, with something of a lofty contempt, bade them have no fear, and told Alexander that they would carry on the war with the destroyers of their city and temples “ so long as the sun held its course in heaven” —and warned him, as he valued his safety, never again to bring them a like proposal. They were terribly in earnest;. for when one Lycidas, a fellow-townsman, counselled submission on another occasion, they stoned him to death. CHAPTER XII. PLATiEA AND MYCALE. u A day of onsets of despair ! Dashed on every rocky square, Their surging charges foamed themselves away. Last the Prussian trumpet blew; Through the long-tormented air Heaven flashed a sudden jubilant ray, And down we swept, and charged, and overthrew.” —Tennyson : “ Ode on the Death of the Duke of Wellington.” TrtE concluding act of the great historical drama opens with the spring of b.c. 479. Mardonius has come south from Thessaly, and is gleaning in Athens what¬ ever the spoiler, Xerxes, had left. The Athenians are again in their island-asylum of Salamis. The Spartans are marching on the Isthmus of Corinth, under the command of Pausanias, who had succeeded his father Cleombrotus in the regency and the guardiansnip of the young son of Leonidas, who did not live to reign. After a demonstration towards Megara, where he hoped to cut off the advanced - guard of the allies, Mardonius proceeded into the Theban territory, where he constructed a vast fortified camp on the bank of the river Asopus. A general ad- PLAT.EA AND MYCALE. 1G7 vance was now made by the Peloponnesians from the isthmus to Eleusis, where they were joined by the Athenian contingent from Salamis. When they had ascertained where the Persians were, they set them¬ selves in array along the highlands of Cithaeron. As they seemed indisposed to come down into the plain, Mardonius sent his cavalry to feel their position, under the command of Masistius. This Murat of the Persian army was a hand¬ some giant, who rode a white Msasan charger, whose accoutrements, as well as those of his rider, glit¬ tered with gold. So rode Charles of Burgundy at Granson or at Morat. In the present day such cos¬ tume is scarcely to be seen further west than India, and some tall Rajah, full dressed for the Governor- General’s durbar, would give a good idea of liow Ma¬ sistius looked at the head of his cuirassiers. These galloped up to the Greek infantry in troops, hurling their javelins, and calling them “ women ” because they did not come on. The Megarians were in the most exposed place. Being hard pressed, they sent to Pausanias for succour. When he called for volunteers, the Athenians promptly offered, and three hundred picked men, supported by archers, moved up. The charges continued without cessation, Masistius leading with the utmost gallantry, and presenting a conspicu¬ ous mark to the bowmen. At last an arrow pierced the side of his charger. He reared back from the agony of the wound, and threw his rider, who now lay at the mercy of his enemies, stunned by his fall, and, like the knights of the middle ages, help¬ less from the weight of his panoply. His vest of Tyrian crimson was pierced with spear-points, but 168 THE HISTORY OF HERODOTUS. still he lived, for under it he wore a shirt of golden mail. At last a hand more dexterous than the rest pierced his brain through one of the eye-holes of his visor, for he was too proud to ask for quarter. Amongst his own followers, as they charged and wheeled about, no one knew that he was dead, and they might even have ridden over the body of their unconscious com¬ mander, as the Prussian cavalry did over Blucher when he lay under his dead horse at Ligny. But when they retired lie was immediately missed, for there was no one to give the word of command. All that they could now do for him was to recover his body, and with this object the squadrons united and made a combined onset. To meet this, the Athenians called up other Greek troops to their assistance. While they were coming, a fierce struggle took place for the body, which the Athenians were obliged to leave till their reinforcements joined them. But as it could not be easily removed by cavalry, it ultimately remained in possession of the Greeks. Many Persian knights shared the fate of their commander, so that the rest of the troopers were obliged to ride back to Mardonius with the news of their misfortune. The death of Masistius was con¬ sidered such a blow that it was bewailed by the whole army, corps after corps taking up the dole of theii Adonis, till it resounded through all Boeotia, and horses and men were ordered to be shorn and shaven as a sign of public mourning; for Masistius, next to Mardo¬ nius, was considered the greatest man in the army. Tc the Greeks his fall was a matter of equal rejoicing, and the handsome corpse was carried along the lines to raise the spirits of the soldiers. Their fear of cavalry was now wearing off, and a general forward movement PLATjEA and MYCALE. 1G9* was made towards the plain of Plataea, where water was more abundant. They took up a new posi¬ tion near the Gargaphian Fountain (the modern Yer* gantiani). Here a hot debate arose between the Tegeans and Athenians, each demanding the honour of occupying the left wing (the Spartans always claimed the right), which was decided, chiefly on mythological grounds, in favour of the Athenians. The army was thus marshalled : on the right were five thousand heavy-armed Spartans, with thirty-five thousand light- armed Helots, and of other Laconians five thousand ; then the Tegeans, then the other Greek contingents, till on the extreme left six hundred Plataeans stood by the side of eight thousand Athenians under Aristides. The decision of Greek battles mainly rested on the heavy¬ armed infantry. Each man of these was generally at¬ tended by his military servant, and looked upon himself as an officer and a gentleman. The Athenian contin¬ gent probably represented all who were not engaged on board the fleet. The remnant of the Thespians—whose city as well as Plataea had been sacked—eighteen hun¬ dred in number, were also there, but now too much impoverished to serve as heavy-armed. The sum total of the army was one hundred and ten thousand men, being less than one to three to the army of the king. Mardonius honoured the Spartans by confronting them Avith his best troops, the Persians ; he posted his Medes, Bactrians, Indians, and Sacae opposite the other Greeks, and threatened the Athenians with liis Greek and Macedonian allies. Besides his three hun¬ dred thousand, he had a number of small contingents, such as marines from the fleet, and perhaps fifty thou¬ sand Greek auxiliaries. It was not the custom for 170 THE HISTORY OF HERODOTUS. any army to engage until tlie omens liad been pro¬ nounced favourable ; and the soothsayers on both sides constantly reported that they were favourable for de¬ fence, but not for attack. After the two armies had thus watched each other for eight days, Mardonius was advised to occupy the passes of Cithaeron, as the Greeks were constantly being reinforced from that quarter, and accordingly despatched cavalry to a pass leading to Plataea, called “Three Heads” by the Boeotians, and “Oakheads” by the Athenians (the Greek words sounding much the same). This foray resulted in destroying a military train of five hundred sumpter animals, which was making its way to the Greek army. The two next days were passed in demonstrations of cavalry up to the Asopus, which ran between the armies, the Theban horse showing great alacrity in annoying their Hellenic brethren, but leaving the serious fighting to the Persians. On the eleventh day Mar¬ donius, tired of inaction, held a council of war, the result of which was that he ordered an attack on the next day, in spite of the still unfavourable auspices. In the dead of night, as the armies lay in position, the Athenian sentries were accosted by a solitary horse¬ man who asked to speak to their commanders. When they came to the front, he told them that the omens had till now restrained Mardonius, but that yesterday he had “bid the omens farewell,” and intended to fight on the morrow. He added, that he hoped that his present service would not be forgotten ; he was of Greek origin, and a secret friend of the Greeks: his name was Alexander, the son of Amvntas of Macedonia. As soon as the message had been reported to Pausanias, he, with a scarcely Spartan spirit, PL A TJEA AND M YCALE 171 wished the Athenians to change places with him, as, from their experience at Marathon, they knew the Persian manner of lighting "better. And this man¬ oeuvre, dangerous as it was to attempt in the face of the enemy, would have "been executed, had not Mar- donius discovered it, and made a corresponding dispo¬ sition of his own army. He then sent a herald to reproach the Spartans, and challenge them to light man for man, with or without the rest of the combatants, as they pleased. As no answer was given, his cavalry were launched en masse against the Greek army. The mounted archers caused them great annoyance, and de¬ stroyed the Gargaphian well, from which their water supply was drawn. The supplies from the rear having "been cut off, the Greeks determined on a westward movement towards the city of Platsea, where they would be within reach of water. Half the army were to carry out this movement in the night, while the other half were to fall back on Cithaeron, to protect their line of communication with their base behind the isthmus. The first division had suffered so much dur¬ ing the day, that in their joy at the respite they retired too far, and never halted till they reached the pre¬ cincts of a temple of Juno, close to Plataea itself. Pausanias himself was following, but he was kept back by the insubordination of a sturdy colonel named Amompharetus, who objected to any strategic movements which looked like running away. At length he was' left to follow or not, as he pleased, while the rest of the Spartans defiled along the safe and hilly ground, the Athenians striking across the exposed plain. Mardonius had now some reason to despise his enemy, and he ordered all his cavalry to 172 THE HISTORY OF HERObOTUS. charge, and the infantry to advance at quick march, crossing the Asopus. The Athenians were hidden from him by a series of knolls, but he pressed hard on the steps of the Lacedaemonians and Tegeans. Fortune sometimes favours the timid as well as the brave. Seeing Mardonius apparently pursuing the enemy, the rest of his army at once broke their ranks and followed in disorder, each man eager to be in at the death of the quarry which his commander was hunting down. Pausanias had already sent a mounted orderly to the Athenians to beg that they would come to his assistance, or at least send their archers, as he was sorely vexed by the cavalry. They could not comply, as they wanted all their strength to repulse a general attack which was just then being made on them by the king’s Greeks. Pausanias halted his line; but still the sacrifices were unpropitious. From behind the Persian breastwork of shields came a rain of arrows, and the breastwork itself seemed impreg¬ nable. The Lacedaemonians and Tegeans were falling fast. At last Pausanias espied at no great distance the temple of Juno, and offered up a prayer to the god¬ dess. The omens at once changed, as by magic. The Tegeans dashed at the enemy’s fence of shields. The Spartans followed, and the battle was won. The Per¬ sians fought like bull-dogs, singly or in knots, though their long dress, says the chronicler, was terribly in the way. They wrenched away or snapt asunder the long Greek lances, and made play with their hangers. Mardonius, conspicuous on a white horse, like Ney at "Waterloo, was the “ bravest of the brave.” But at last a cry rose that Mardonius was down, and at that cry the Persians wavered, and fled in wild PLAICE A AND MY VALE. 173 disorder to the great stockade which had been built to protect their camp. But Artabazus, who had now come up, had kept his forty thousand men in hand when he saw the scramble of the attack; and when he saw the repulse, he made no attempt to save the day, but faced about and at once began an orderly retreat on the Hellespont. Some of the Greeks who had joined the Persian king fought desperately in their miserable cause. Three hundred noble Thebans are said to have fallen in the front of the battle. This may have been the “ Sacred Band ” which fought under Epaminondas in later history, and which con¬ sisted of friends sworn to live and die together. These Thebans fought indeed “with halters round their necks : ” for after the victory, Pausanias insisted on the surrender of the chiefs of the late movement, and executed them all. When the Greeks who had made the mistake of retreating too far turned back in disorder to get their share of the glory, poetical justice overtook them in the shape of a charge of the Persian and Theban cavalry, which stung them with the energy of a doomed swarm of wasps. They lost six hundred men, and were scattered to the heights of Citliaeron. All w r as not yet over. A new battle began at the Persian camp, which vigorously repelled the onslaughts of the Spartans and their allies. It was not till the Athenians came up (who understood “ wall-fighting,” says Herodotus) that the day could be 6poken of as finally decided. They managed to break or upset the “ abattis,” and the Tegeans again led the forlorn hope through it or over it. Then began the slaughter. Only three thousand were left alive of the whole Persian army. This seems incredible, 174 THE HISTORY OF HERODOTUS. especially in connection with the small number of tho allies who fell in the action, as given by Herodotus. But the vanquished were possibly impounded in their fortified camp, like the wretched Mamelukes whom Mehemet Ali destroyed in the court of a fortress. The plunder was immense. The tent of Mardonius, with all the royal plate which the king had left him. his manger of bronze, gold and silver in all shapes, splendidly inlaid arms, vestments, horses, camels, beau¬ tiful women, became the dangerous prize of the needy Peloponnesians, who, to avert Nemesis, offered a tithe- of all to the gods. Pausanias buried with due hon¬ ours the body of the brave Mardonius, though he was strongly urged by an iEginetan of high rank to remem¬ ber how that of Leonidas had been treated by Xerxes. “ Would you have me humble my country in the dust, now that I have just raised her 1” was the Spartan’s answer. And he bid the proposer be thankful that he answered hiir only in words. It seems to have been the invidious custom in all Greek battles to assign to one or two men the prize of valour, and our author always gives their names. The bravest of all was adjudged to be the Spartan Aristodemus, sole survivor of the glorious three hundred of Thermopylae. He could not bear his life, and now lost it purposely ; therefore he was refused the usual honours. Sophanes was proclaimed the bravest of the Athenians : he was in fact so brave that (perhaps adopting an idea from his expe¬ rience afloat) he wore an anchor and chain, by which he moored himself to his post in action.* It is * So the wounded at the battle of Clontarf, in Ireland, said to have got themselves tied to stakes. PLATTE A AND MYCALE. l75 a pity to lose our faith in so quaint an expedient; but there was another version of the story, says our honest chronicler, that he bore an anchor as the device on his shield. The prudent Artabazus reached Byzan¬ tium safely, though he was roughly handled on the road by the Thracians and Macedonians, the latter of whom had been from the first favourable to the Greeks. This “crowning mercy” of Plataea, as Cromwell would have called it, was supplemented by a brilliant action which took place on the same day at Mycale, on the coast of Ionia. When the season for navigation had come, the Greek fleet under Leotychides, which had remained at Delos, pushed across to Samos, but the prey they had ex¬ pected to find there had flown. The Persian fleet had placed itself under the protection of a land force of sixty thousand men under Tigranes, appointed by Xerxes governor of Ionia, and was drawn up on shore at Mycalk, protected by a rampart and palisade. The Greeks came provided with gangway boards, and all other appliances for naval action. But the Persians were morally sea-sick, therefore Leotychides disem¬ barked. his troops at his leisure. A mysterious rumour of a great victory in Boeotia, ascribed to some divine messenger, but possibly brought as a telegram by tire- signals, put the Greeks in heart. Tt was afternoon, and the field of Plataea had been fought in the morning. The Athenians were already engaged, when the Lacedae¬ monians came up, having to make a circuit by a rugged way intersected with ravines. As at Plataea, the Per¬ sians fought well as long as their rampart of bucklers stood upright: even when it gave way, they broke up into clusters, which fought like wild boars at bay. 176 THE HISTORY OF HERODOTUS. The onset of the Athenians was the more furious that they feared to have their laurels snatched from them by their friends. They drove the Persians into their camp, and, more fortunate than their brethren at Plata3a, entered it pell - mell with the flying enemy. The barbarian auxiliaries fled where they could, but the Persians themselves still held out desperately, until the Lacedaemonians came up and completed the defeat. Tigranes and Mardontes died as became Per¬ sian officers, fighting gallantly to the last. The Mile¬ sians in the Persian service, who had been posted to guard the passes of the mountain, turned on the fugitives and cut them up; for revolt became general among the Ionian Greeks as soon as the battle was over, and Samos, Chios, Lesbos, and other islands, joined the confederacy for reprisals against Persia. The Greek fleet now sailed to the Hellespont, where they found the bridge of boats destroyed. Then Leotychides went home with his Spartans, but the Athenians stayed and besieged Sestos, which held out till the autumn, when it was taken by famine. There had been a serious debate whether it would not be better to remove the Ionian colonists altogether, and settle them in Greece, than leave them to the future tender mercies of Persia. Put the cpiestion was settled by the Athenians taking their Asiatic colonies into dose league and alliance. In those two memorable years, which end the narrative of Herodotus, Europe had established its preponderance over Asia for ever. The last tableau of his great epic drama is almost lost in its blaze of glory, and it is time that the curtain should fall. It is true that Herodotus hardly recoguises PLATJEA AND MYCALE. 177 tliis, and tries to amuse his readers for some time longer with the not very edifying court-scandal of Susa. Xerxes had infinite trouble with the ladies of his court. The fierce and jealous sultana Ames- tris, who treated her rival with such fiendish cruelty, may he the Vashti of the Book of Esther, as Alias- uerus is supposed to be the Scriptural form of hei husband’s name. Nemesis was fully satisfied when Xerxes himself fell a victim to a palace intrigue ; hut this is not mentioned by Herodotus, nor that a statue of that dread Power was placed on the spot where he had been a spectator of the destruction of his fleet. a. c. vol. iii. CHAPTER Xin. CONCLUDING REMARKS. It lias thus been attempted to give, in a succinct form, the general drift and character of the great work of Herodotus. In the original, his liquid and pellucid Ionian dialect constitutes one of the greatest charms of his style. In simple perspicuity he forms a remarkable contrast to the terse and gnarled Thucyd¬ ides, who propounds so many puzzles to the classical scholar. But no ancient author is so profitable to read in a good translation. A good translation is like a good photograph, giving distinctive traits, and light and shade, hut no life or colour. Our attempt is a coloured sketch on a small scale, and not a photo¬ graph, of a great book. Herodotus may be considered, according to the stan¬ dard of his time, as a decidedly veracious historian. And his veracity is of the kind that wears well. It is impossible to refuse to credit him with general impar¬ tiality; and if he erred at all, the modern reader will readily pardon his excessive sympathy with the Athe¬ nians. Yet he does full justice to the gallantry, gener¬ osity, and other high qualities of the Persians. Ho was born, we must remember, a Persian subject,—for Halica^iaasus did not recover its independence until COXCLUDING REMARKS. 17b he had grown np to manhood—and he could speak from experience of the masters of Ionia, that their rule was, on the whole, just and equal. His own town, indeed, had met with exceptional kindness from her liege lords. Hence he has none of the usual Greek •contempt of and antipathy to “barbarians,” or peo¬ ple speaking an unknown tongue, which is a primd facie reason for dislike with the vulgar of all nations. His great merit is that of Homer and Shakespeare, a broad catholicity of sentiment in observing and esti¬ mating character. He has the strongest sympathy with heroism whenever displayed, an exquisite feeling for humorous situations, and, as naturally connected with humour, intense pathos when the subject admits of it. He has the head of a sage, the heart of a mother, and the simple apprehension of a child. And if his style is redundant with a sort of Biblical reiteration, it is always clear and luminous. There can never be any mistake about his meaning, as long as no corruption has crept into his text, which, when it happens, is the fault of his transcribers, and not his own. His ethical portraits are above all invaluable, and, however fabulous the cir¬ cumstances with which they are connected, must have been true to the life, from their evidently undesigned consistency. The benignant and vain Croesus, the am¬ bitious Cyrus, the truculent Cambyses, the chivalrous yet calculating Darius, the wild Cleomenes, the wise and wary Themistocles, the frantic Xerxes—the very type of the infatuation by which the divine vengeance wrought—these, and a host of other portraits of living men, can only be compared in their verisimilitude with the immortal creations of Shakespeare. Hot a few pleasant anecdotes—mythical, ethical, ISO TUB HISTORY OF HERODOTUS. social, and historical—as well as nearly all the minor * affluents of the .main stream of narrative, have been passed over or barely glanced at, for want of spaca Some indelicacies have been softened in stories too good to omit, but this process leaves their spirit un¬ changed. For our author is always antique and always natural. When he errs against refinement, it is in a sort of infantine naughtiness — not with the perverse intention of a modern writer. Indeed, his high moral principle cannot fail to strike even a careless reader. His blood plainly boils at in¬ justice or cruelty; and whatever superstition he may have inherited with his religious creed, he has an in¬ tense faith in an overruling Providence, which, spite of some anomalies which puzzle him, as they have done the wisest in all ages, does on the whole ordain that “ the righteous shall be recompensed in the earth- much more the wicked and the sinner.” END OF HERO DOT mi A ncient Classics for English Readers EDITED BY THE REV. W. LUCAS COLLINS. M.A. C M S A B 1 CONTENTS OF THE SERIES, HOMER : THE ILIAD.By the Editor. HOMER: THE ODYSSEY, . . By the Same. ' HERODOTUS, ... By George C. Swayne, M.A. C/ESAR,.By Anthony Trollope. VIRGIL,.By the Editor. HORACE,.By Theodore Martin. ALSCHYLUS, By the Right Rev. the Bishop of Colombo. XENOPHON, . . By Sir Alex. Grant, Bart., LL.D. CICERO,.By the Editor. SOPHOCLES, ... By Clifton W. Collins, M.A. PLINY, By A. Church. M.A., and W. J. Brodribb, M.A. EURIPIDES, ... By William Bodham Donne. JUVENAL, .... By Edward Walford, M.A. ARISTOPHANES,.By the Editor. HESIOD AND THEOGNIS, By the Rev. James Davies, M.aT PLAUTUS AND TERENCE, ... By the Editor. TACITUS, .... By William Bodham Donne. LUCIAN,.By the Editor. PLATO,.By Clifton W. Collins. THE GREEK ANTHOLOGY, ... By Lord Neaves. LIVY,.By the Editor. OVID,.By the Rev. A. Church, M.A. CATULLUS, TIBULLUS, & PROPERTIUS, ByJ. Davies, M.A. DEMOSTHENES, . . By the Rev. W. J. Brodribb, M.A. ARISTOTLE, . . .By Sir Alex. Grant, Bart., LL.D. THUCYDIDES.By the Editor. LUCRETIUS.By W. H. Mallock, M.A. PINDAR, ... By the Rev. F. D. Morice, M.A, THE COMMENTARIES OF C M S A R BY ■w ANTHONY TROLLOPE PHILADELPHIA: J. B. LIPPINCOTT COMPANY ..I • I I CONTENTS CRAP. PAGB I. INTRODUCTION, ..1 II. FIRST BOOK OF THE WAR IN GAUL.—CjESAR DRIVES FIRST THE SWISS AND THEN THE GERMANS OUT OF GAUL. —B.C. 58,.28 III. SECOND BOOK OF THE WAR IN GAUL. — CiESAR SUB¬ DUES THE BELGIAN TRIBES.—B. C. 57, . . 45 IV. THIRD BOOK OF THE WAR IN GAUL. —CAESAR SUB¬ DUES THE WESTERN TRIBES OF GAUL.—B. C. 56, 54 V. FOURTH BOOK OF THE WAR IN GAUL. — CESAR CROSSES THE RHINE, SLAUGHTERS THE GER¬ MANS, AND GOES INTO BRITAIN.—B.C. 55, . 63 VI. FIFTH BOOK OF THE WAR IN GAUL. — CiESAR*S SECOND INVASION OF BRITAIN. — THE GAULS RISE AGAINST HIM.—B.C. 54, . . . .74 VII. SIXTH BOOK OF THE WAR IN GAUL.—CiESAR PUR¬ SUES AMBIORIX.—THE MANNERS OF THE GAULS AND OF THE GERMANS ARE CONTRASTED.— CONTENTS. vf VIII. SEVENTH BOOK OF THE WAR IN GAUL.—THE REVOLT OF VERCINGETORIX.—B.C. 52, . . . . 100 IX. FIRST BOOK OF THE CIVIL WAR. — C.ESAR CROSSES THE RUBICON.—FOLLOWS POMPEY TO BRUNDU- SIUM.—AND CONQUERS AFRANIUS IN SPAIN.— B.C. 49,.116 X. SECOND BOOK OF THE CIVIL WAR.—THE TAKING OF MARSEILLES.—VARRO IN THE SOUTH OF SPAIN. —THE FATE OF CURIO BEFORE UTICA.—B.C. 49, 131 XI. THIRD BOOK OF THE CIVIL WAR.—CiESAR FOLLOWS POMPEY INTO ILLYRIA.—THE LINES OF PETRA AND THE BATTLE OF PIIARSALIA.—B.C. 48, . 146 XII. CONCLUSION, • .. 174 CMS A R. CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION. It may perhaps be fairly said that the Commentaries of Caesar are the beginning of modern history. He wrote, indeed, nearly two thousand years ago; but he wrote, not of times then long past, but of things which were done under his own eyes, and of his own deeds. And he wrote of countries with which we are familiar, —of our Britain, for instance, which he twice invaded, of peoples not so far remote but that we can identify them with our neighbours and ourselves; and he so wrote as to make us feel that we are reading actual history, and not romance. The simplicity of the nar¬ ratives which he has left is their chief characteristic, if not their greatest charm. We feel sure that the cir¬ cumstances which he tells us did occur, and that they occurred very nearly as he tells them. He deals with those great movements in Europe from which have a. c. vol. iv. A 2 C JUS AIL sprung, and to which we can trace, the present politi¬ cal condition of the nations. Interested as the scholar, or the reader of general literature, may he in the great deeds of the heroes of Greece, and in the burning words of Greek orators, it is almost impossible for him to connect by any intimate and thoroughly-trusted link the fortunes of Athens, or Sparta, or Macedonia, with our own times and our own position. It is almost equally difficult to do so in regard to the events of Pome and the Poman power before the time of Caesar. We cannot realise and bring home to ourselves the Punic Wars or the Social War, the Scipios and the Gracchi, or even the contest for power between Marius and Sulla, as we do the Gallic Wars and the invasion of Britain, by which the civilisation of Pome was first carried westwards, or the great civil wars,—the “ Bei- lum Civile,”—by which was commenced a line of em¬ perors continued almost down to our own days, and to which in some degree may be traced the origin and formation of almost every existing European nation. It is no doubt true that if we did but know the facts correctly, we could refer back every political and social condition of the present day to the remotest period of man’s existence; but the interest fails us when the facts become doubtful, and when the mind begins to fear that history is mixed with romance. Herodotus is so mythic that what delight we have in his writings conies in a very slight degree from any desire on our part to form a continuous chain from the days of which he wrote down to our own. Between the marvels of He¬ rodotus and the facts of Caesar there is a great interval, INTRODUCTION. 3 from which have come down to us the works of various noble historians; hut with Caesar it seems that that certainty commences which we would wish to regard as the distinguishing characteristic of modem history. It must he remembered from the beginning that Caesar wrote only of what he did or of what he caused to he done himself. At least he only so wrote in the two works of his which remain to us. We are told that he produced much besides his Commentaries,— among other works, a poem,—but the two Commen¬ taries are all of his that we have. The former, in seven books, relates the facts of his seven first campaigns in Gaul for seven consecutive years ; those campaigns in which he reduced the nations living between the Rhine, the Rhone, the Mediterranean, the Pyrenees, and the sea which we now call the British Channel.* The latter Commentary relates the circumstances of the civil war in which he contended for power against Poni- pey, his former colleague, with Crassus, in the first triumvirate, and established that empire to which Augustus succeeded after a second short-lived trium¬ virate between himself and Lepidus and Antony. It is the object of this little volume to describe Caesar’s Commentaries for the aid of those who do not read Latin, and not to write Roman history' but it may be well to say something, in a few intro¬ ductory lines, of the life and character of our author. We are all more or less familiar with the name of Julius Caesar. In our early days we learned that he * There is an eighth hook, referring to an eighth and ninth campaign, hut it is not the work of Caesar. 4 CjESA r. was the first of those twelve Roman emperors with whose names it was thought right to burden oul young memories; and we were taught to understand that when he began to reign there ceased to exist that form of republican government in which two consuls elected annually did in truth preside over the fortunes of the empire. There had first been seven kings,— whose names have also been made familiar to us,—then the consuls, and after them the twelve Caesars, of whom the great Julius was the first. So much we all know of him ; and we know, too, that he was killed in the Capitol by conspirators just as he was going to become emperor, although this latter scrap of know¬ ledge seems to be paradoxically at variance with the former. In addition to this we know that he was a great commander and conqueror and writer, who did things and wrote of them in the “ veni, vidi, vici ” style — saying of himself, “I came, I saw, I con¬ quered.” We know that a great Roman army was intrusted to him, and that he used this army for the purpose of establishing his own power in Rome by taking a portion of it over the Rubicon, which little river separated the province which he had been ap¬ pointed to govern from the actual Roman territory within which, as a military servant of the magistrates of the republic, he had no business to appear as a genera] 1 the head of his army. So much we know; and in the following very short memoir of the great commander and historian, no effort shall be made,—as has been so frequently and so painfully done for us in late years,—to upset the teachings of our youth, and to INTRODUCTION. 5 prove that the old lessons were wrong. They were all fairly accurate, and shall now only be supplemented by a few further circumstances which were doubtless once learned by all school-boys and school-girls, but which some may perhaps have forgotten since those happy days. Dean Merivale, in one of the early chapters of his admirable history of the Ilomans under the Empire, declares that Caius Julius Caesar is the greatest name in history. He makes the claim without reserve, and attaches to it no restriction, or suggestion that such is simply his own opinion. Claims of this nature, made by writers on behalf of their pet-heroes, we are, all of us, generally inclined to dispute; but this claim, great as it is, can hardly be disputed. Dr Merivale does not say that Caesar was the greatest man that ever lived. In measuring such supremacy, men take for themselves various standards. To satisfy the judgment of one, it is necessary that a poet should be selected; for another, a teacher of religion; for a third, some intellectual hero who has assisted in discovering the secrets of nature by the operations of his own brain; for a fourth, a ruler,—and so on. But the names of some of these cannot be said to be great in history. Homer, Luther, Galileo, and Charles V., are great names,—as are also Shakespeare, Knox, Queen Elizabeth, and Newton. Among these, the two rulers would probably be the least in general admiration. But no one can assert that the names of the poets, divines, and philosophers, are greater than theirs in history. The Dean means that of all men who have lived, and whose deeds are known 6 CAESAR. to us, Julius Caesar did most to move the world; and we think that the Dean is right. Those whom we might, perhaps, compare with Caesar, are Alexander, Charlemagne, Cromwell, Napoleon, and Washington. In regard to the first two, we feel, when claims are made for them, that they are grounded on the perform* ance of deeds only partially known to us. In the days of Alexander, history was still dark,—and it had be¬ come dark again in those of Charlemagne. What Crom¬ well did was confined to our OAvn islands, and, though he was great for us, he does not loom as large before the eyes of mankind in general as does one who moved all Europe, present and future. If there be any fair antagonist to Caesar in this claim, it is Napoleon. As a soldier he was equally great, and the area of his operations was as extended. But there is an old say¬ ing which tells us that no one can be sure of his fortune till the end shall have come; and Caesar’s death on the steps of the Capitol was more in accord¬ ance with our ideas of greatness than that of Napo¬ leon at St Helena. We cannot, moreover, but feel that there were fewer drawbacks from greatness in the personal demeanour of the Roman “ Imperator ” and Dictator than in that of the French Emperor. For Julius Caesar was never really emperor, in that sense in which we use the word, and in accordance with which his successor Augustus really became an emperor. As to Washington, we may perhaps allow that in moral attributes he was the greatest of all. To aid his country he dared all,—even a rebel’s disgraceful death, had he not succeeded where success was most improba INTRODUCTION. 7 ble; and in all that he attempted he succeeded. His is the name that culminates among those of the men who made the United States a nation, and does so by the eager consent of all its people. And his work came altogether from patriotism,—with no alloy of personal ambition. But it cannot be said that the things he did were great as those which were done by Caesar, or that he himself was as potent in the doing of them. He ventured everything with as grand a purpose as ever warmed the heart of man, and he was successful; but the things which he did were in themselves small in comparison 'with those effected by his less noble rival for fame. Mommsen, the German historian, describes Caesar as a man too great for the scope of his intelligence and power of delineation. “ The historian,” he says, speaking of Caesar, “ when once in a thousand years he encounters the perfect, can only be silent regarding it.” Napoleon also, in his life of Caesar, paints his hero as perfect; but Napoleon w T hen doing so is, in fact, claiming godlike perfection for that second Caesar, his uncle. And the perfection which he claims is not that of which Mommsen speaks. The German intends to convey to us his conviction that Caesar was perfect in human capacity and intelligence. Napoleon claims for him moral per¬ fection. “ We may be convinced,” says the Emperor, “ by the above facts, that during his first consulate, one only motive animated Caesar,—namely, the public interest.” We cannot, however, quite take the facts as the Emperor of the French gives them to us, nor can we sha^e his conviction; but the common consent 8 C2ESA R. of reading men will probably acknowledge that there is in history no name so great as that of Julius Caesar,— of whose written works some account is intended to be given in the following chapters. He was born just one hundred years before Christ, and came of an old noble Roman family, of which Ju¬ lius and not Caesar was the distinctive name. Whence came the name of Caesar has been a matter of doubt and of legend. Some say that it arose from the thick hair of one of the Julian tribe; others that a certain scion of the family, like Macduff, “ was from his mo¬ ther’s womb untimely ripped,” for which derivations Latin words are found to be opportune. Again we are told that one of the family once kept an elephant,—and we are referred to some eastern language in which the word for elephant has a sound like Caesar. Another legend also rose from Caesar’s name, which, in the Gal¬ lic language of those days,—very luckily for Caesar,— sounded as though one should say, “ Send him back.” Caesar’s horse once ran away with him, and carried him over to the enemy. An insolent Gaul, who knew him, called out, “ Caesar, Caesar! ” and so the other Gauls, obeying the order supposed to be given, allowed the illustrious one to escape. It must be acknowledged, however, that the learned German who tells us this storj 7 expresses a contemptuous conviction that it can¬ not be true. Whatever may have produced the word, its significance, derived from the doings and writings of Caius Julius, has been very great. It has come to mean in various languages the holder of despotic power; and though it is said that, as a fact, the Russian title INTRODUCTION. 9 Czar has no connection with the Roman word, so great is the prestige of the name, that in the minds of men the popular appellation of the Russian Emperor will always he connected with that of the line of the Roman Emperor. Caesar was the nephew by marriage of that Marias who, with alternations of bloody successes and seem¬ ingly irreparable ruin, had carried on a contest with Sulla for supreme power in the republic. Sulla in these struggles had represented the aristocrats and pat¬ ricians,—what we perhaps may call the Conservative interest; while Marius, whose origin was low, who had been a common soldier, and, rising from the ranks, had become the darling of the army and of the people, may perhaps be regarded as one who would have called him¬ self a Liberal, had any such term been known in those days. His liberality,—as has been the case with other political leaders since his time,—led him to personal power. He was seven times Consul, having secured his seventh election by atrocious barbarities and butcher- ings of his enemies in the city; and during this last con¬ sulship he died. The young Caesar, though a patrician by birth, succeeded his uncle in the popular party, and seems from a very early age,—from his very boyhood,— to have looked forward to the power which he might win by playing his cards with discretion. And very discreet he was,—self-confident to a won¬ derful degree, and patient also. It is to be presumed that most of our readers know how the Roman Repub¬ lic fell, and the Roman Empire became established as the result of the civil wars which began with Marius 10 CAES A R. and ended with that “ young Octavius” whom we better recognise as Augustus Csesar. Julius Caesar was the nephew by marriage of Marius, and Augustus was the great-nephew and heir of Julius. By means of con- sciiptions and murders, worse in their nature, though less probably in number, than those which disgraced the French Revolution, the power which Marius achieved almost without foresight, for which the great Caesar strove from his youth upwards with constant foresight, was confirmed in.the hands of Augustus, and bequeathed by him to the emperors. In looking back at the annals of the world, we shall generally find that despotic power has first grown out of popular move¬ ment against authority. It was so with our own Cromwell, has twice been so in the history of modern France, and certainly was so in the formation of the Roman Empire. In the great work of establishing that empire, it was the mind and hand and courage of Csesar that brought about the result, whether it was for good or evil. And in looking at the lives of the three men—Marius, Caesar, and Augustus, who followed each other, and all worked to the same end, the destruction of that oligarchy which was called a Republic in Rome— we find that the one was a man, while the others were beasts of prey. The cruelties of Marius as an old man, and of Augustus as a young one, were so astounding as, even at this distance, to horrify the reader, though he remembers that Christianity had not yet softened men’s hearts. Marius, the old man, almost swam in the blood of his enemies, as also did his rival Sulla; but the young Octavius, he whom the gods favoured so 7iV TRO DUCT ION. 11 long as the almost divine* Augustus, cemented his throne with the blood of his friends. To complete the satisfaction of Lepidus and Antony, his comrades in the second triumvirate, he did not scruple to add to the list of those who were to die, the names of the nearest and dearest to him. Between these monsters of cruelty—between Marius and Sulla, who went before him, and Octavius and Antony who followed him— Caesar has become famous for clemency. And yet the hair of the reader almost stands on end with horror as Caesar recounts in page after page the stories of cities burned to the ground, and whole communities slaugh¬ tered in cold blood. Of the destruction of the women and children of an entire tribe, Caesar w r ill leave the unimpassioned record in one line. But this at least may be said of Caesar, that he took no delight in slaughter. When it became in his sight expedient'that a people should suffer, so that others might learn to yield and to obey, he could give the order apparently without an effort. And w r e hear of no regrets, or of any remorse which followed the execution of it. But blood¬ shed in itself was not sweet to him. He was a discreet, far-seeing man, and could do without a scruple what dis¬ cretion and caution demanded of him. And it may be said of Caesar that he was in some sort guided in bis life by sense of duty and love ol country; as it may also be said of his great contem¬ poraries, Pompey and Cicero. With those who went * Coelo tonantem credidimus Jovem Regnare ; preesens Divus liabebitur Augustus. 12 CuESAR. before him, Marius and Sulla, as also with those who followed him, Antony and Augustus, it does not seem that any such motives actuated them. Love of power and greed, hatred of their enemies and personal ambi¬ tion, a feeling that they were urged on by their fates to seek for high place, and a resolve that it was better to kill than be killed, impelled them to their courses. These feelings were strong, too, with Caesar, as they are strong to this day with statesmen and with generals; but mingled with them in Caesar’s breast there was a noble idea, that he would be true to the greatness of Rome, and that he would grasp at power in order that the Roman Empire might be well governed. Augustus, doubtless, ruled well; and to Julius Caesar very little scope for ruling was allowed after his battling was done; but to Augustus no higher praise can be assigned than that he had the intelligence to see that the temporary wellbeing of the citizens of Rome was the best guarantee for his own security. Early in life Caesar lifted himself to high position, though be did so in the midst of dangers. It was the wonder of those around him that Sulla did not mur¬ der him when he was young,—crush him while he was yet, as it were, in his shell; but Sulla spared him, and he rose apace. We are told that he became priest of Jupiter at seventeen, and he was then already a married man. He early trained himself as a public orator, and amidst every danger espoused the popular cause in Rome. Ho served his country in the East,—in Bithynia, probably,—escaping, by doing so, the perils of a residence in the city. He became Quaestor and then INTRODUCTION. 13 /Edile, assisted by all the Marian party, as that party would assist the rising man whom they regarded as their future leader. He attacked and was attacked, and was “ indefatigable in harassing the aristo¬ cracy,” * who strove, but strove in vain, to crush him. Though young, and addicted to all the pleasures of youth,—a trifler, as Sulla once called him,— he omitted to learn nothing that was neces¬ sary for him to know as a chief of a great party and a leader of great armies. When he was thirty- seven he was made Pontifex Maximus, the official chief of the priesthood of Pome, the office greatest in honour of any in the city, although opposed by the whole weight of the aristocracy, and although Catulus was a candidate, who, of all that party, was the highest not only in renown but in virtue. He became Praetor the next year, though again he was opposed by all the influence of those who feared him. And, after his twelve months of office, he assumed the government of Spain,—the province allotted to him as Propraetor, in accordance with the usage of the Pepublic,—in the teeth of a decree of the Senate order¬ ing him to remain in Pome. Here he gained his first great military success, first made himself known to his soldiery, and came back to Pome entitled to the honour of a triumph. But there was still another step on the ladder of the State before he could assume the position which no doubt he already saw before him. He must be Consul before he could be the master of many legions, and in * The words are taken from Dean Merivale’s history. u CAESAR. order that he might sue in proper form for the consul* ship, it was necessary that he should abandon his Triumph. He could only triumph as holding the office of General of the Republic’s forces, and as General or Imperator he could not enter the city. He abandoned the Triumph, sued for his office in the common fashion, and enabled the citizens to say that he preferred their service to his personal honours. At the age of forty-one he became Consul. It was during the struggle for the consulship that the triumvirate was formed, of which subsequent ages have heard so much, and of which Romans at the time heard probably so little. Pompey, who had been the political child of Sulla, and had been the hope of the patricians to whom he belonged, had returned to Rome after various victories which he had achieved as Proconsul in the East, had triumphed, —and had ventured to recline on his honours, dis¬ banding his army and taking to himself the credit of subsiding into privacy. The times were too rough for such honest duty, and Pompey found himself for a while slighted by his party. Though he had thought himself able to abandon power, he could not bear the loss of it. It may be that he had conceived himself able to rule the city by his influence without the aid of his legions. Caesar tempted him, and they two with Crassus, who was wanted for his wealth, formed the first triumvirate. By such pact among themselves they were to rule all Rome and all Rome’s provinces; but doubtless, by resolves within himself of which no one knew, Caesar intended even then to grasp the do¬ minion of the whole in his own hands. During the INTRODUCTION. 15 years that followed,—the years in which Caesar was em • gaged in his Gallic wars,—Pompey remained at Pome, not indeed as Caesar’s friend—for that hollow friend¬ ship was brought to an end by the death of Julia, Caesar’s daughter, whom Pompey, though five years Caesar’s elder, had married—but in undecided rivalship to the active man who in foreign wars was preparing legions by which to win the Empire. Afterwards, when Caesar, as we shall hear, had crossed the Pubicon, their enmity was declared. It was natural that they should be enemies. In middle life, Pompey, as we have seen, had married Caesar’s daughter, and Caesar’s second wife had been a Pompeia.* But Avlien they were young, and each was anxious to attach himself to the politics of his own party, Pompey had married the daughter-in-law of Sulla, and Caesar had married the daughter of Cinna, who had almost been joined with * She was that wife who was false with Clodius, and whom Caesar divorced, declaring that Caesar’s wife must not even he suspected. He would not keep the false wife; neither would he at that moment take part in the accusation against Clodius, who was of his party, and against whom such accusation hacked by Caesar would have been fatal. The intrusion of the dema¬ gogue into Caesar’s house in the pursuit of Caesar’s wife dur¬ ing the mysteries of the Bona Dea became the subject of a trial in Home. The offence was terrible and was notorious. Clodius, who was hated and feared by the patricians, was a favourite with the popular party. The offender was at last brought to trial, and was acquitted by venal judges. A word spoken by the injured husband would have insured his condemnation, but that word Caesar would not speak. His wife he could divorce, but he would not jeopardise his power with his own party by demanding the punishment of him who had debauched her. 16 C jESA R. Marius in leading the popular party. Such having been the connection they had made in their early lives, it was natural that Pompey and Csesar should be enemies, and that the union of those two with any other third in a triumvirate should be but a hollow compromise, planned and carried out only that time might be gained. Caesar was now Consul, and from his consular chair laughed to scorn the Senate and the aristocratic col¬ league with whom he was joined,—Bibulus, of whom Ave shall again hear in the Commentary on the civil war. During his year of office lie seems to have ruled almost supreme and almost alone. The Senate was forced to do his bidding, and Pompey, at any rate for this year, was his ally. We already know that to praetors and to consuls, after their year of office in the city, were confided the government of the great pro¬ vinces of the Republic, and that these officers while so governing were called propraetors and proconsuls. After his praetorship Caesar had gone for a year to southern Spain, the province which had been assigned to him, whence he came back triumphant,—but not to enjoy his Triumph. At the expiration of his consul¬ ship the joint provinces of Cisalpine Gaul and Illy- ricum were assigned to him, not for one year, but for five years; and to these Avas added Transalpine Gaul, by which grant dominion Avas given to him over all that country which Ave now know as Northern Italy, OA^er Illyria to the east, and to the west across the Alps, over the Roman province already established in the south of France. This province, bounded on the north by Lake Leman and the SAviss mountains, ran INTRODUCTION. 17 couth to the Mediterranean, and to the west half across the great neck of land which joins Spain to the continent of Europe. This province of Trans¬ alpine Gaul was already Roman, and to Caesar was intrusted the task of defending this, and of defending Rome itself, from the terrible valour of the Gauls. That he might do this it was necessary that he should collect his legions in that other Gaul which we now know as the north of Italy. It does not seem that there was any preconceived idea that Caesar should reduce all Gallia beneath the Roman yoke. Hitherto Rome had feared the Gauls, and had been subject to their inroads. The Gauls in former years had even made their way as invaders into the very city, and had been bought out with a ransom. They had spread themselves over Northern Italy, and hence, when Northern Italy was conquered by Roman arms, it became a province under the name of Cisalpine Gaul. Then, during the hundred years which preceded Caesar’s wars, a province was gradually founded and extended in the south of France, of which Marseilles was the kernel. Massilia had been a colony of Greek merchants, and was supported by the alliance of Rome. Whither such alliance leads is known to all readers of history. The Greek colony became a Roman town, and the Roman province stretched itself around the town. It was Caesar’s duty, as governor of Transalpine Gaul, to see that the poor province was not hurt by those ravaging Gauls. How he performed that duty he tells us in his first Commentary. During the fourth year of his office, while Pompoy a. c. vol. iv. B 18 CAESAR. and Crassus, liis colleagues in tlie then existing trium¬ virate, were consuls, his term of dominion over the three provinces was prolonged by the addition of five other years. But he did not see the end of the ten years in that scene of action. Julia, his daughter, had died, and his great rival was estranged from him. The Senate had clamoured for his recall, and Pompey, with doubtful words, had assented. A portion of his army was demanded from him, was sent by him into Italy in obedience to the Senate, and shortly afterwards was placed under the command of Pompey. Then Caesar found that the Italian side of the Alps was the more convenient for his purposes, that the Hither or Cis¬ alpine Gaul demanded his services, and that it would he well for him to he near the Bubicon. The second Commentary, in three hooks, ‘ De Bello Civili,’ giving us his record of the civil war, tells us of his deeds and fortunes for the next two years,—the years b.c. 49 and 48. The continuation of his career as a general is related in three other Commentaries, not hy his own hand, to which, as being beyond the scope of this volume, only short allusion will be made. Then camo one year of power, full of glory, and, upon the whole, well used; and after that there came the end, of which the tale has been so often told, when he fell, stabbed by friend and foe, at the foot of Pompey’s pillar in the Capitol, It is only further necessary that a few words should be added as to the character of Caesar’s "writings,—for it is of his writings rather than of his career that it is intended here to give some idea to those who have not INTRODUCTION. 19 an opportunity of reading them. Caesar’s story can hardly be told in this little volume, for it is the his¬ tory of the world as the world then was. The word which our author has chosen as a name for his work,— and which now has become so well known as connected with Caesar, that he who uses it seems to speak of Caesar, —means, in Caesar’s sense, a Memoir. Were it not for Caesar, a “ Commentary ” would be taken to signify that which the critic had added, rather than the work which the author had first produced. Caesar’s ‘‘ Commentaries ” are memoirs written by himself, descriptive of his differ¬ ent campaigns, in which he treats of himself in the third person, and tells his story as it might have been told by some accompanying scribe or secretary. This being so, we are of course driven to inquire whether some accompanying scribe or secretary may not in truth have done the work. And there is doubtless one great argu¬ ment which must be powerful with us all towards the adoption of such a surmise. The amount of work which Cassar had on hand, not only in regard to his campaigns, but in the conduct of his political career, was so great as to have overtasked any brain without the addition of literary labour. Surely no man was ever so worked; for the doctrine of the division of labour did not pre¬ vail then in great affairs as it does now. Ccesar was not only a general; he was also an engineer, an astrono¬ mer, an orator,, a poet, a high priest—to whom, as such, though himself, as we are told, a disbeliever in the gods of Olympus, the intricate and complicated system of JEioman worship was a necessary knowledge. And he was a politician, of whom it may be said that, though 20 CuESA R. he was intimately acquainted with the ferocity of op* position, he knew nothing of its comparative leisure. We have had busy statesmen writing books, two prime ministers translating Homer, another writing novels, a fourth known as a historian, a dramatist, and a bio¬ grapher. But they did not lead armies as well as the Houses of Parliament, and they were occasionally blessed by the opportunities of comparative political retirement which opposition affords. Prom the beginning of the Gallic war, Caesar was fighting in person every year but one till he died. It was only by personal fighting that he could obtain success. The reader of the following pages will find that, with the solitary exception of the siege of Marseilles, nothing great was done for him in his absence. And he had to make his army as well as to lead it. Legion by legion, he had to collect it as he needed it, and to collect it by the force of his own char¬ acter and of his own name. The abnormal plunder with which it was necessary that his soldiers should be allured to abnormal valour and toil had to be given as though from his own hand. For every detail of the sol¬ diers’ work he was responsible ; and at the same time it was incumbent on him so to manipulate his Tioman enemies at Pome,—and, harder still than that, his Bo- man friends,—that confusion and destruction should not fall upon him as a politician. Thus weighted, could he write his own Commentaries ? There is reason to believe that there was collected by him, no doubt with the aid of his secretaries, a large body of notes which were known as the Ephemerides of Caesar,—jottings down, as we may say, taken from day to day. Were INTRODUCTION. 21 not the Commentaries which hear Caesar’s name com¬ posed from these notes by some learned and cunning secretary ? These notes have been the cause of much scholastic wrath to some of the editors and critics. One learned German, hotly arguing that Caesar wrote no Ephem- erides, does allow that somebody must have written down the measurements of the journeys, of the moun¬ tains, and of the rivers, the numbers also of the cap¬ tives and of the slaves.* “ Not even I,” says he,— “ not even do I believe that Caesar was able to keep all these things simply in his memory.” Then he goes on to assert that to the keeping of such notes any scribe was equal; and that it was improbable that Caesar could have found time for the keeping of notes when absolutely in his tent. The indignation and enthusiasm are comic, but the reasoning seems to be good. The notes were probably collected under Caesar’s immediate eyes by his secretaries; but there is ample evidence that the Commentaries themselves are Caesar’s own work. They seem to have become known at once to the learned Romans of the day; and Cicero, who was probably the most learned, and cer¬ tainly the best critic of the time, speaks of them with¬ out any doubt as to their authorship. It was at once known that the first seven hooks of the Gallic War were written by Caesar, and that the eighth was not. This seems to be conclusive. But in addition to this, there is internal evidence. Caesar writes in the third person, and is very careful to maintain that mode of * Nipperdeius. 22 CJES A R. expression. But he is not so careful but that on three or four occasions lie forgets himself, and speaks in the first person, Ho other writer, writing for Caesar, would have done so. And there are certain trifles in the mode of telling the story, which must have been per¬ sonal to the man. He writes of “ young” Crassus, and young” Brutus, as no scribe would have written; and he shows, first his own pride in obtaining a legion from Pompey’s friendship, and then his unmeasured disgust when the Senate demand and obtain from him that legion and another one, and when Pompey uses them against himself, in a fashion which would go far to prove the authenticity of each Commentary, were any proof needed. But the assent of Caesar’s contem¬ poraries suffices for this without other evidence. And it seems that they were written as the Avars were carried on, and that each was published at once. Had it not been so, we could not understand that Caesar should have begun the second Commentary before he had finished the first. Tt seems that he was hindered by the urgency of the Civil War from writing what with him would have been the two last books of the Gallic War, and therefore put the completion of that work into the hands of his friend Hirtius, who wrote the memoir of the two years in one book. And Caesar’s mode of speaking of men who were at one time his friends and then his enemies, shows that his first Commentary was completed and out of hand before the other was written. Labienus, who in the Gallic War was Caesar’s most trusted lieu¬ tenant, went over to the other side and served under Pompey in the Civil War. He could not have failed INTRODUCTION . 23 to allude in some way to tlie desertion of Labienus, in the first Commentary, had Labienus left him and joined Pompey while the first Commentary was still in his hands. His style was at once recognised by the great literary critic of the day as being excellent for its intended purpose. Caesar is manifestly not ambitious of liter¬ ary distinction, but is very anxious to convey to his readers a narrative of his own doings, which shall be graphic, succinct, intelligible, and sufficiently well ex¬ pressed to insure the attention of readers. Cicero, the great critic, thus speaks of the Commentaries ; “ Yalde quidam, inquam, probandos; nudi enim sunt, recti, et venusti, omni ornatu orationis, tanquam veste, de- tracto.” The passage is easily understood, but not perhaps very easily translated into English. “ I pro¬ nounce them, indeed, to be very commendable, for they are simple, straightforward, agreeable, with all rhetorical ornament stripped from them, as a garment is stripped.” This was written by Cicero while Caesar was yet living, as the context shows. And Cicero does not mean to imply that Caesar’s writings are bald or uncouth: the word “venusti” is evidence of this. And again, speaking of Caesar’s language, Cicero says that Caesar spoke with more finished choice of words than almost any other orator of the day. And if he so spoke, he certainly so wrote, for the great speeches of the Homans were all written compositions. Montaigne says of Caesar : “ I read this author with somewhat more reverence and respect than is usually allowed to human writings, one while con* sidering him in his person, by his actions and miracu* 24 CJZSAlt. lous greatness, and another in the purity and inimitable polish of his language and style, wherein he not only excels all other historians, as Cicero confesses, but per- adventure even Cicero himself.” Cicero, however, • confesses nothing of the kind, and Montaigne is so far wrong. Caesar was a great favourite with Montaigne, who always speaks of his hero with glowing enthu¬ siasm. To us who love to make our language clear by the number of words used, and who in writing rarely give ourselves time for condensation, the closely-packed style of Caesar is at first somewhat difficult of compre¬ hension. It cannot be read otherwise than slowly till the reader’s mind is trained by practice to Caesarean expressions, and then not with rapidity. Three or four adjectives, or more probably participles, joined to substantives in a sentence, are continually intended to convey an amount of information for which, with us, three or four other distinct sentences would be used. It is almost impossible to give the meaning of Caesar in English without using thrice as many words as he uses. The same may be said of many Latin writers,—perhaps of all; so great was the Roman tendency to condensation, and so great is ours to dilution. But with Caesar, though every word means much, there are often many words in the same sen¬ tence, and the reader is soon compelled to acknowledge that skipping is out of the question, and that quick reading is undesirable. That which will most strike the ordinary English . reader in the narrative of Caesar is the cruelty of the Homans,—cruelty of which Caesar himself is guilty to INTRODUCTION. 25 a frightful extent, and of which he never expresses horror. And yet among his contemporaries lie achieved a character for clemency which he has retained to the present day. In describing the character of Caesar, without reference to that of his contemporaries, it is impossible not to declare him to have been terribly cruel. From bloodthirstiness he slaughtered none; but neither from tenderness did he spare any. All was done from policy; and when policy seemed to him to demand blood, he could, without a scruple,—as far as we can judge, without a pang,—order the destruction of human beings, having no regard to number, sex, age, innocence, or helplessness. Our only excuse for him is that he was a Roman, and that Romans were indif¬ ferent to blood. Suicide was with them the common mode of avoiding otherwise inevitable misfortune, and it was natural that men who made light of their own lives should also make light of the lives of others. Of all those with whose names the reader will become acquainted in the folloAving pages, hardly one or two died in their beds. Caesar and Pompey, the two great ones, were murdered. Dumnorix, the iEduan, was killed by Caesar’s orders. Yercingetorix, the gal- lantest of the Gauls, was kept alive for years that his death might grace Caesar’s Triumph. Ariovistus, the German, escaped from Caesar, but we hear soon after of his death, and that the Germans resented it. He doubtless was killed by a Roman weapon. What became of the hunted Ambiorix we do not know, but his brother king Cativolcus poisoned himself with the juice of yew-tree. Crassus, the partner of Caesar and Pompey in the first triumvirate, was killed by 26 CMS A R. the Parthians. Young Crassus, the son, Caesar’s officer in Gaul, had himself killed by his own men that he mi "lit not fall into the hands of the Par- O tliians, and his head was cut off and sent to his father. Labienus fell at Munda, in the last civil war in Spain. Quintus Cicero, Caesar’s lieuten¬ ant, and his greater brother, the orator, and his son, perished in the proscriptions of the second trium¬ virate. Titurius and Cotta were slaughtered with all their army by Ambiorix. Afranius was killed by Caesar’s soldiers after the last battle in Africa. Petreiua was hacked to pieces in amicable contest by King Juba. Varro indeed lived to be an old man, and to write many books. Domitius, who defended Mar¬ seilles for Pompey, was killed in the flight after Pliar- salia. Trebonius, who attacked Marseilles by land, was killed by a son-in-law of Cicero at Smyrna. Of Decimus Brutus, who attacked Marseilles by sea, one Camillus cut off the head and sent it as a present to Antony. Curio, who attempted to master the pro¬ vince of Africa on behalf of Caesar, rushed amidst his enemy’s swords and was slaughtered. King Juba, who conquered him, failing to kill himself, had him¬ self killed by a slave. Attius Yarns, who had held the province for Pompey, fell afterwards at Munda. Marc Antony, Caesar’s great lieutenant in the Pharsa- lian wars, stabbed himself. Cassius Longinus, another lieutenant under Caesar, was drowned. Scipio, Pom- pey’s partner in greatness at Pharsalia, destroyed him¬ self in Africa. Bibulus, his chief admiral, pined to death. Young Ptolemy, to whom Pompey fled, was drowned in the Nile. The fate of his sister Cleopatra INTRODUCTION. 27 is known to all the world. Pharnaces, Caesar’s enemy in Asia, fell in battle. Cato destroyed himself at Utica. «/ Pompey’s eldest son, Cnseus, was caught wounded in Spain and slaughtered. Sextus the younger was killed some years afterwards by one of Antony’s sol¬ diers. Brutus and Cassius, the two great conspirators, both committed suicide. But of these two we hear little or nothing in the Commentaries; nor of Augustus Caesar, who did contrive to live in spite of all the bloodshed through which he had waded to the throne. Among the whole number there are not above three, if so many, who died fairly fighting in battle. The above is a list of the names of men of mark,— of warriors chiefly, of men who, with their eyes open, knowing what was before them, went out to encounter danger for certain purposes. The bloody catalogue is so complete, so nearly comprises all whose names are mentioned, that it strikes the reader with almost a comic horror. But when we come to the slaughter of whole towns, the devastation of country effected pur¬ posely that men and women might starve, to the abandonment of the old, the young, and the tender, that they might perish on the hillsides, to the mutila¬ tion of crowds of men, to the burning of cities told us in a passing word, to the drowning of many thousands, -—mentioned as we should mention the destruction of a brood of rats,—the comedy is all over, and the heart becomes sick. Then it is that we remember that the coming of Christ has changed all things, and that men now,—though terrible things have been done sinco Christ came to us,—are not as men were in the days of Caesar. I CHAPTER H. FIRST BOOK OF THE WAR IN GAUL.—CLESAR DRIVES FIRST THIS SWISS AND THEN THE GERMANS OUT OF GAUL.—B.O. 58 . It has been remarked in the preceding chapter that Ccesar does not appear to have received any commission for the subjugation of Gaul when he took military charge of his three provinces. The Gauls were still feared in Rome, and it was his duty to see that they did not make their way over the Alps into the Roman territory. It was also his duty to protect from invasion, and also from rebellion, that portion of Gaul which had already been constituted a Roman province, but in which the sympathies of the people were still rather with their old brethren than with their new masters. The experience, however, which we have of great and encroaching empires tells us how probable it is that the protection of that which the strong already holds should lead to the grasping of more, till at last all has been grasped. It is thus that our own empire in India has grown. It was thus that, the Spanish empire grew in America. It is thus that the empire of the United States is now growing. It was thus that Prussia, driven, as we all remember, by CAESARS PROBABLE INTENTIONS. 29 the necessity of self-preservation, took Nassau the other dav, and Hanover and Holstein and Hesse. It was thus that the wolf claimed all the river, not being able to endure the encroaching lamb. The humane reader of history execrates, as he reads, the cruel, all-absorb¬ ing, ravenous wolf. But the philosophical reader per¬ ceives that in this way, and in no other, is civilisation carried into distant lands. The wolf, though he be a ravenous wolf, brings with him energy and know¬ ledge. What may have been Caesar’s own aspirations in regard to Gaul, when the government of the provinces was confided to him, we have no means of knowing. We may surmise,—indeed we feel that we know,—that he had a project in hand much greater to him, in his view of its result, than could be the adding of any new province to the Republic, let the territory added be as wide as all Gaul. He had seen enough ol Roman politics to know that real power in Rome coulc only belong to a master of legions. Both Marius anc 1 Sulla had prevailed in the city by means of the armies which they had levied as the trusted generals of the Republic. Pompey had had his army trained to conquest in the East, and it had been expected that he also would use it to the same end. He had been magnanimous, or half-hearted, or imprudent, as critics of liis conduct might choose to judge him then and may choose to judge him now, and on reaching Italy from the East had disbanded his legions. As a con¬ sequence, he was at that moment, when Caesar was looking out into the future and preparing his own 30 TI1E WAR IN OAUL.—FIRST BOOK. career, fain to seek some influence in the city by join¬ ing himself in a secret compact with Caesar, his natural enemy, and with Crassus. Caesar, seeing all this, knowing how Marius and Sulla had succeeded and had failed, seeing what had come of the magnanimity of Pompey—resolved no doubt that, whatever might he the wars in which they should he trained, he would have trained legions at his command. When, there¬ fore, he first found a cause for war, he was ready for war. He had not been long proconsul before there came a wicked lamb and drank at his stream. In describing to us the way in which he conquered lamb after lamb throughout the whole country which he calls Gallia, he tells us almost nothing of himself. Of his own political ideas, of his own ambition, even of his doings in Italy through those winter months which he generally passed on the Roman side of the Alps, having left his army in winter quarters under his lieutenants, he says but a very few words. His record is simply the record of the campaigns; and although he now and then speaks of the dignity of the Republic, he hardly ever so far digresses from the narrative as to give to the reader any idea of the motives by which he is actuated. Once in these seven memoirs of seven years’ battling in Gaul, and once only, does he refer to a motive absolutely personal to himself. When he succeeded in slaughtering a fourth of the emigrating Swiss, which was his first military success in Gaul, he tells us that he had then revenged an injury to himself as well as an injury to the Re¬ public, because the grandfather of his father-in-law THE MANNER OF CAESAR’S NARRATIVE. 31 had in former wars been killed by the very tribe which he had just destroyed ! It is to be observed, also, that he does not intention¬ ally speak in the first person, and that when he does so it is in some passage of no moment, in which the person¬ ality is accidental and altogether trivial. He does not speak of “ I ” and “ me,” but of Caesar, at though he, Caesar, who wrote the Commentary, Avert, not the Caesar of whom he is writing. Hot unfrequently ho speaks strongly in praise of himself; but as there is no humility in his tone, so also is there no pride, even when he praises himself. He never seems to boast, though he tells us of his own exploits as he does of those of his generals and centurions. Without any diffi¬ dence he informs us now and again how, at the end of this or that campaign, a “ supplication,” or public festival and thanksgiving for his victories, was decreed in Home, on the hearing of the news,—to last for fifteen or twenty days, as the case might be. Of his difficulties at home,—the political difficulties with which he had to contend,—he says never a Avord. And yet at times they must have been A r ery harassing. We hear from other sources that during these Avars in Gaul his conduct Avas Auolently reprobated in Home, in that he had, with the utmost cruelty, attacked and crushed states supposed to be in amity with Rome, and that it Avas once even proposed to give him up to the enemy as a punishment for grievous treachery to the enemy. Had it been so resolved by the Roman Senate, —had such a laAV been enacted,—the poAver to carry out the laAV would have been wanted. It Avas easier 32 THE WAR IN GAUL.—xTlRST BOOa. to grant a “ supplication” for twenty days than to stop his career after his legions had come to know him. Nor is there very much said by Caesar of his strategic difficulties; though now and then, especially when his ships are being knocked about on the British coast, and again when the iron of his heel has so bruised the Gauls that they all turn against him in one body under Vereingetorix, the reader is allowed to see that he is pressed hard enough. But it is his rule to tell the thing he means to do, the way he does it, and the completeness of the result, in the fewest pos¬ sible words. If any student of the literature of battles would read first Caesar’s seven books of the Gallic War, and then Mr ICinglake’s first four volumes of the ‘ Invasion of the Crimea,’ he would be able to com¬ pare two most wonderful examples of the dexterous use of words, in the former of which the narrative is told with the utmost possible brevity, and in the latter with almost the utmost possible prolixity. And yet each narrative is equally clear, and each equally dis¬ tinguished by so excellent &n arrangement of words, that the reader is forced to acknowledge that the story is told to him by a great master. In praising others,—his lieutenants, his soldiers, and occasionally his enemies,—Caesar is often enthusiastic, though the praise is conferred by a word or two,—is given, perhaps, simply in an epithet added on for that purpose to a sentence planned with a wholly different purpose. Of blame he is very sparing; so much so, that it almost seems that he looked upon certain imperfections, in regard even to faith as well as valour THE MANNER OF CjESAR'S NARRATIVE. 33 or prudence, as necessary to humanity, and pardonable because of their necessity. He can tell of the absolute destruction of a legion through the folly and perhaps cowardice of one of his lieutenants, without heaping a word of reproach on the name of the unfortunate. He can relate how a much-favoured tribe fell off from their faith again and again without expressing anger at their faithlessness, and can explain how they were,—hardly forgiven, but received again as friends,—because it suited him so to treat them. But again he can tell us, without apparently a quiver of the pen, how he could devote to destruction a city with all its women and all its children, so that other cities might know what would come to them if they did not yield and obey, and become vassals to the godlike hero in whose hands Providence had placed their lives and their possessions. It appears that Caesar never failed to believe in himself. He is far too simple in his language, and too conscious of his own personal dignity, to assert that he has never been worsted. But his very simplicity seems to convey the assurance that such cannot ulti¬ mately be the result of any campaign in which he is engaged. He seems to imply that victory attends him so certainly that it would be futile in any case to dis¬ cuss its probability. He feared no one, and was there¬ fore the cause of awe to others. He could face his own legions when they would not obey his call to arms, and reduce them to obedience by a word. Lucan, understanding his character well, says of him that “ he deserved to be feared, for he feared nothing a. o. vol. iv ° 34 THE WAR IN GA UL.—FIRST BOOK. “ meruitque timeri Nil metuens.” He writes of liimself as we might imagine some god would write who knew that his divine purpose must of course prevail, and who would therefore never he in the way of entertain¬ ing a doubt. With Caesar there is always this godlike simplicity, which makes his “Veni, vidi, vici,” the natural expression of his mind as to his own mode of action. The same thing is felt in the very numerous but very brief records of the punishments which he in¬ flicted. Cities are left desolate, as it were with a wave of his hand, but he hardly deigns to say that his own hand has even been waved. He tells us of one Acco who had opposed him, that, “Graviore sententia pro- nunciata,”—as though there had been some jury to pronounce this severe sentence, which was in fact pro¬ nounced only by himself, Caesar,—he inflicted punish¬ ment on him “more majorum.” We learn from other sources that this punishment consisted in being strip¬ ped naked, confined by the neck in a cleft stick, and then being flogged to death. In the next words, hav¬ ing told us in half a sentence that he had made the country too hot to hold the fugitive accomplices of the tortured chief, he passes on into Italy with the majes¬ tic step of one much too great to dwell long on these small but disagreeable details. And we feel that he is too great. It has been already said that the great proconsular wolf was not long in hearing that a lamb had come down to drink of his stream. The Helvetii, or Swiss, as we call them,—those tribes which lived on the Lake Leman, and among the hills and valleys to the north THE EMIGRATION OF THE HELVE TIL 35 of the lake,—had made up their minds that they were inhabiting hut a poor sort of country, and that they might considerably better themselves by leaving their mountains and going out into some part of Gaul, in which they might find themselves stronger than the existing tribes, and might take possession of the fat of the land. In doing so, their easiest way out of their own country would lie by the Rhone, where it now runs through Geneva into France. But in taking this route the Swiss would be obliged to pass over a corner of the Roman province. Here was a case of the lamb troubling the waters with a vengeance. When this was told to Caesar,—that these Swiss intended, “ facere iter per Provinciam nostram ”—“ to do their travelling through our Province,”—he hurried over the Alps into Gaul, and came to Geneva as fast as he could travel. He begins his first book by a geographical definition of Gaul, which no doubt was hardly accurate, but which gives us a singularly clear idea of that which Caesar desired to convey. In speaking of Gallia he intends to signify the whole country from the outflow of the Rhine into the ocean down to the Pyrenees, and then eastward to the Rhone, to the Swiss moun¬ tains, and the borders of the Roman Province. This fie divides into three parts, telling us that the Belgians inhabited the part north of the Seine and Marne, the people of Aquitania the part south of the Garonne, and the Gauls or Celts, the intermediate territory. Having so far described the scene of his action, he rushes off at once to the dreadful sin of the Swiss emigrants in desiring to pass through “ our Province.” 36 THE WAR IN GAUL.—FIRST BOOR. He has but one legion in Further Gaul,—that is, in the Roman province on the further side of tho Alps from Rome ; and therefore, when ambassadors come to him from the Swiss, asking permission to go through the corner of land, and promising that they will do no harm in their passage, he tem¬ porises with them. He can’t give them an answer just then, but must think of it. They must come back to him by a certain day,—when he will have more soldiers ready. Of course he refuses. The Swiss make some slight attempt, but soon give that matter up in despair. There is another way by which they can get out of their mountains,—through the territory of a people called Sequani; and for doing this they obtain leave. But Caesar knows how injurious the Swiss lambs will be to him and his wolves, should they succeed in getting round to the back of his Pro¬ vince,—that Roman Province which left the name of Provence in modern France till France refused to be divided any longer into provinces. And he is, more¬ over, invited by certain friends of the Roman Republic, called the iEdui, to come and stop these rough Swiss travellers. He is always willing to help the iEdui, although these AEdui are a fickle, inconstant people,— and he is, above all things, willing to get to war. So he comes upon the rear of the Swiss when three portions of the people have passed the river Arar (Saone), and one portion is still behind. This hinder- most tribe,—for the wretches were all of one tribe or mountain canton,—he sets upon and utterly destroys; and on this occasion congratulates himself on having THE EMIGRATION OF THE HELVETII. 37 avenged liimself upon the slayers of the grandfather of his father-in-law. There can he nothing more remarkable in history than this story of the attempted emigration of the Helvetii, which Caesar tells us without the expression of any wonder. The whole people made up their minds that, as their borders were narrow, their num¬ bers increasing, and their courage good, they would go forth,—men, women, and children,—and seek other homes. We read constantly of the emigrations of people,—of the Northmen from the north covering the southern plains, of Danes and Jutes entering Britain, of men from Scandinavia coming down across the Rhine, and the like. We know that after this fashion the world has become peopled. But we picture to ourselves generally a concourse of warriors going forth and leaving behind them homes and friends, to whom they may or may not return. With these Swiss wanderers there was to be no return. All that they could not take with them they destroyed, burning their houses, and burning even their corn, so that there should be no means of turning their steps back¬ ward. They do make considerable progress, getting as far into France as Autun,—three-fourths of them at least getting so far; but near this they are brought to an engagement by Caesar, who outgenerals them on a hill. The prestige of the Romans had not as yet established itself in these parts, and the Swiss nearly have the best of it. Caesar owns, as he does not own again above once or twice, that the battle between them was very long, and for long very doubtful. But 38 TIIE WAR IN GAUL.—FIRST BOOK. at last the poor Helvetii are driven in slaughter. Caesar, however, is not content that they should simply fly. He forces them back upon their old territory,—upon their burnt houses and devastated fields,—lest certain Germans should come and live there, and make themselves disagreeable. And they go back;—so many, at least, go back as are not slain in the adventure. With great attempt at accuracy, Caesar tells us that 368,000 human beings went out on the expedition, and that 110,000, or less than a third, found their way back. Of those that perished, many hecatombs had been offered up to the shade of his father-in-law’s grandfath er. Hereupon the Gauls begin to see how great a man is Caesar. He tells us that no sooner was that war with the Swiss finished than nearly all the tribes of Gallia send to congratulate him. And one special tribe, those iEdui,—of whom we hear a great deal, and whom we never like because they are thoroughly anti-Gallican in all their doings till they think that Caesar is really in trouble, and then they turn upon him,—have to beg of him a great favour. Two tribes, —the iEdui, whose name seems to have left no trace in France, and the Arverni, whom we still know in Auvergne,—have been long contending for the upper hand; whereupon the Arverni and their friends the Sequani have called in the assistance of certain Ger¬ mans from across the Rhine. It went badly then with the iEdui. And now one of their kings, named Hivitiacus, implores the help of Caesar. Would Caesar be kind enough to expel these horrid Germans, and A RIO VIST US AND HIS GERMANS. 39 get back the hostages, and free them from a burden¬ some dominion, and put things a little to rights 1 And, indeed, not only were the iEdui suffering from these Germans, and their king, Ariovistus; it is going still worse with the Sequani, who had called them in. In fact, Ariovistus was an intolerable nuisance to that eastern portion of Gaul. Would Caesar be kind enough to drive him out 1 Caesar consents, and then we are made to think of another little fable,—of the prayer which the horse made to the man for assistance in his contest with the stag, and of the manner in which the man got upon the horse, and never got down again. Caesar was not slow to mount, and when once in the saddle, certainly did not mean to leave it. Caesar tells us his reasons for undertaking this com¬ mission. The A£dui had often been called “ brothers ” and “ cousins ” by the Roman Senate; and it was not fitting that men who had been so honoured should be domineered over by Germans. And then, unless these marauding Germans could be stopped, they would fall into the habit of coming across the Rhine, and at last might get into the Province, and by that route into Italy itself. And Ariovistus himself was per¬ sonally so arrogant a man that the thing must be made to cease. So Csesar sends ambassadors to Ariovistus, and invites the barbarian to a meeting. The barbarian will not come to the meeting. If he wanted to see the Roman, he would go to the Roman : if the Roman wants to see him, the Roman may come to him. Such is the reply of Ariovistus. Ambassadors pass between them, and there is a good deal of argument, in which 40 THE WAR IN OA UL.—FIRST BOOK. the barbarian has the best of it. Caesar, with his god¬ like simplicity, scorns not to give the barbarian the benefit of his logic. Ariovistus reminds Caesar that the Romans have been in the habit of governing the tribes conquered by them after their fashion, without interference from him, Ariovistus; and that the Ger¬ mans claim and mean to exercise the same right. He goes on to say that he is willing enough to live in amity with the Romans; but will Caesar be kind enough to remember that the Germans are a people unconquered in war, trained to the use of arms, and how hardy he might judge when he was told that for fourteen years they had not slept under a roof 1 In the mean time other Gauls w r ere complaining, and begging for assistance. The Treviri, people of the country where Treves now stands, are being harassed by the terrible yellow-haired Suevi, who at this time seem to have possessed nearly the whole of Prussia as it now exists on the further side of the Rhine, and who had the same desire to come westward that the Prussians have evinced since. And a people called the Harudes, from the Danube, are also harassing the poor iEdui. Caesar, looking at these things, sees that unless he is quick, the northern and southern Germans may join their forces. He gets together his commissariat, and flies at Ariovistus very quickly. Throughout all his campaigns, Caesar, as did Hapo- leon afterwards, effected everything by celerity. He preaches to us no sermon on the subject, favours us with no disquisition as to the value of despatch in war, but constantly tells us that he moved all his army ARIOVISTUS AND HIS GERMANS. 41 “inagnis itineribus”—by very rapid marches; that he went on with his work night and day, and took pre¬ cautions “magno opere,”—with much labour and all his care,—to be beforehand with the enemy. In this instance Ariovistus tries to reach a certain town of the poor Sequani, then called Vesontio, now known to us as Besantjon,—the same name, but very much altered. It consisted of a hill, or natural fortress, almost sur¬ rounded by a river, or natural fosse. There is nothing, says Caesar, so useful in a war as the possession of a place thus naturally strong. Therefore he hurries on and gets before Ariovistus, and occupies the town. The reader already begins to feel that Caesar is des¬ tined to divine success. The reader indeed knows that beforehand, and expects nothing worse for Caesar than hairbreadth escapes. But the Romans them selves had not as yet the same confidence in him. Tidings are brought to him at Vesontio that his men are terribly afraid of the Germans. And so, no doubt, they were. These Romans, though by the art of war they had been made fine soldiers,—though they had been trained in the Eastern conquests and the Punic wars, and invasions of all nations around them,—w r ere nevertheless, up to this day, greatly afraid even of the Gauls. The coming of the Gauls into Italy had been a source of terror to them ever since the days of Brennus. And the Germans were worse than the Gauls. The boast made by Ariovistus that his men never slept beneath a roof was not vain or useless. They were a horrid, hirsute, yellow-haired people, the flashing aspect of whose eyes could hardly be endured 42 THE WAR IN GAUL.—FIRST BOOK. by an Italian. The fear is so great that the soldiers “sometimes could not refrain even from tears;”— “ neque interdum laerimas tenere poterant.” When we remember what these men became after they had been a while with Caesar, their blubbering awe of the Germans strikes us as almost comic. And we are re¬ minded that the Italians of those days were, as they are now, more prone to show the outward signs of emotion than is thought to be decorous with men in more northern climes. We can hardly realise the idea of soldiers cry ing from fear. Caesar is told by his centurions that so great is this feeling, that the men will probably refuse to take up their arms when called upon to go out and fight; whereupon he makes a speech to all his cap¬ tains and lieutenants, full of boasting, full of scorn, full, no doubt, of falsehood, but using a bit of truth when¬ ever the truth could aid him. We know that among other great gifts Caesar had the gift of persuasion. From his tongue, also, as from Hestor’s, could flow “ words sweeter than honey,”—or sharper than steel. At any rate, if others will not follow him, his tenth legion, he knows, will be true to him. He will go forth with that one legion,—if necessary, with that legion of true soldiers, and with no others. Though he had been at his work but a short time, he already had his picked men, his guards, his favourite regiments, his tenth legion ; and he knew well how to use their superiority and valour for the creation of those virtues in others. Then Ariovistus sends ambassadors, and declares that he now is willing to meet Caesar. Let them meet on a certain plain, each bringing only his cavalry A RIO VIST US AND HIS GERMANS. 43 guard. Ariovistus suggests tliat foot-soldiers might he dangerous, knowing that Caesar’s foot-soldiers would bo Romans, and that his cavalry are Gauls. Caesar agrees, but takes men out of his own tenth legion, mounted on the horses of the less-trusted allies. The accounts of these meetings, and the arguments which we are told are used on this and that side, are very interesting. We are bound to remember that Caesar is telling the story for both sides, but we feel that he tries to tell it fairly. Ariovistus had very little to say to Caesar’s demands, but a great deal to say about his own exploits. The meeting, however, was broken up by an attack made by the Germans on Caesar’s mounted guard, and Caesar retires,—not, however, before he has explained to Ariovistus his grand idea of the pro¬ tection due by Rome to her allies. Then Ariovistus proposes another meeting, which Caesar declines to attend, sending, however, certain ambassadors. Ario¬ vistus at once throws the ambassadors into chains, and then there is nothing for it but a fight. The details of all these battles cannot be given within our short limits, and there is nothing special in this battle to tempt us to dwell upon it. Caesar describes to us the way in which the German cavalry and infantry fought together, the footmen advancing from amidst the horsemen, and then returning for protection. His own men fight well, and the Ger mans, in spite of their flashing eyes, are driven head long in a rout back to the Rhine. Ariovistus succeeds in getting over the river and saving himself, but he has to leave his two daughters behind, and his two u THE WAR IN GAUL.—FIRST BOOK . wives. The two wives and one of the daughters are killed; the other daughter is taken prisoner. Caesar had sent as one of his ambassadors to the German a certain dear friend of his, who, as we heard before, was, with his comrade, at once subjected to chains. In the flight this ambassador is recovered. “ Which thing, indeed, gave Caesar not less satisfaction than the victory itself, —in that he saw one of the honestest men of the Pro¬ vince of Gaul, his own familiar friend and guest, rescued from the hands of his enemies and restored to him. Nor. did Fortune diminish this gratification *>y any calamity inflicted on the man. Thrice, as he him¬ self told the tale, had it been decided by lot in his own presence whether he should then be burned alive or reserved for another time.” So Caesar tells the story, and we like him for his enthusiasm, and are glad to hear that the comrade ambassador also is brought back. The yellow-haired Suevi, when they hear of all this, desist from their invasion on the lower Phine, and hurry back into their own country, not without misfortunes on the road. So great already is Caesar’s name, that tribes, acting as it were on his side, dare to attack even the Suevi. Then, in his “Veni, vidi, vici” style, he tells us that, having in one summei finished off two wars, he is able to put his army into Winter quarters even before the necessary time, so that he himself may go into his other Gaul across the Alps, —“ ad conventus agendos,”— to hold some kind of session or assizes for the government of his province, and especially to collect more soldiers. CHAPTER III. SECOND BOOK OF THE WAR IN GAUL.—CJESAE SUBDUES THE BELGIAN TRIBES.—B.C. 57 . The man liad got on tlie horse’s hack, hut the horse had various disagreeable enemies in attacking whom the man might he very useful, and the horse was therefore not as yet anxious to unseat his rider. Would Cresar he so good as to go and conquer the P>elgian tribes 1 Caesar is not slow in finding reasons for so doing. The Belgians are conspiring together against him. They think that as all Gaul has been reduced,—or “pacified,” as Caesar calls it,—the Roman conqueror will certainly bring his valour to hear upon them, and that they had better be ready. Caesar suggests that it would no doubt be felt by them as a great grievance that a Roman army should remain all the winter so near to them. In this way, and governed by these considerations, the Belgian lambs disturb the stream very sadly, and the wolf has to look to it. He collects two more legions, and, as soon as the earth brings forth the food necessary for his increased number of men and horses, he hurries off against these Belgian tribes of Northern Gallia. Of these, one tribe, the 46 TIIE WAR IN GAUL.--SECOND BOOK. Remi, immediately send word to him that they are not wicked lambs like the others; they have not touched the waters. All the other Belgians, say the Remi, and with them a parcel of Germans, are in a con- sp .racy together. Even their very next-door neighbours, their brothers and cousins, the Suessiones, are wicked; but they, the Remi, have steadily refused even to sniff at the stream, which they acknowledge to be the exclusive property of the good wolf. Would the wolf be kind enough to come and take possession of them and all their belongings, and allow them to be the humblest of his friends 1 We come to hate these Remi, as we do the AEdui; but they are wise in their genera¬ tion, and escape much of the starvation and massa¬ cring and utter ruin to which the other tribes are sub¬ jected. Among almost all these so-called Belgian tribes we find the modern names which are familiar to us. Rheims is in the old country of the Remi, Soissons in that of the Suessiones. Beauvais represents the Bel¬ lo vaci, Amiens the Ambiani, Arras the Atrebates, Treves the Treviri,—as has been pointed out before. Silva Arduenna is, of course, the Forest of Ardennes. The campaign is commenced by an attack made by the other Belgians on those unnatural Remi who have gone over to the Romans. There is a town of theirs, Bibrax, now known, or rather not known, ns Bievre, and here the Remi are besieged by their brethren. When Bibrax is on the point of falling,—and we can imagine what would then have been the condition of the towns¬ men,—they send to Caesar, who is only eight miles distant. Unless Caesar will help, they cannot endure CAESAR REDUCES THE BELGIAN TRIBES. 47 any longer such onslaught as is made on them. Caesar, having hided his time, of course sends help, and the poor besieging Belgians fall into inextricable confusion. They agree to go home, each to his own country, and from thence to proceed to the defence of any tribe which Caesar might attack. “ So,” says Caesar, as he ends the story of this little affair, “ without any danger on our part, our men killed as great a number of theirs as the space of the day would admit.” When the sun set, and not till then, came an end to the killing,— such having been the order of Caesar. That these Belgians had really formed any intention of attacking the Roman province, or even any Roman ally, there is no other proof than that Caesar tells us that they had all conspired. But whatever might be their sin, or what the lack of sin on their part, he is determined to go on with the war till he has subju¬ gated them altogether. On the very next day he attacks the Suessiones, and gets as far as bToviodunum, —Royons. The people there, when they see how ter¬ rible are his engines of war, give up all idea of defend¬ ing themselves, and ask for terms. The Bellovaci do the same. At the instigation of his friends the Remi, he spares the one city, and, to please the iEdui, the other. But he takes away all their .arms, and exacts hostages. From the Bellovaci, because they have a name as a powerful people, he takes 600 hostages. Throughout all these wars it becomes a matter of wonder to us what Csesar did with all these hostages, and how he maintained them. It was, however, no doubt clearly understood that they would be killed if 48 THE WAR IN GAUL.—SECOND BOOK. the town, or state, or tribe by which they were given should misbehave, or in any way thwart the great conqueror. The Amhiani come next, and the ancestors of our intimate friends at Amiens soon give themselves up. The next to them are the Hervii, a people far away to the north, where Lille now is and a considerable por¬ tion of Flanders. Of these Caesar had heard wonder¬ ful travellers’ tales. They were a people who admitted no dealers among them, being in this respect very un¬ like their descendants, the Belgians of to-day; they drank no wine, and indulged in no luxuries, lest their martial valour should be diminished. They send no ambassadors to Caesar, and resolve to hold their own if they can. They trust solely to infantry in battle, and know nothing of horses. Against the cavalry of other nations, however, they are wont to protect them¬ selves by artificial hedges, which they make almost as strong as walls. Caesar in attacking the Nervii had eight legions, and he tells us how he advanced against them “consuetu- dine sua,”—after his usual fashion. For some false in¬ formation had been given to the Kervii on this subject, which brought them into considerable trouble. He sent on first his .cavalry, then six legions, the legions consisting solely of foot-soldiers; after these all the baggage, commissariat, and burden of the army, com¬ prising the materials necessary for sieges; and lastly, the two other legions, which had been latest enrolled. It may be as well to explain here that the legion in the time of Caesar consisted m paper of six thousand heavy- CAESAR REDUCES THE BELGIAN TRIBES. 49 armed foot-soldiers. There were ten cohorts in a legion, and six centuries, or six hundred men, in each cohort. It may possibly be that, as with our regiments, the numbers were frequently not full. Eight full legions would thus have formed an army consisting of 48,000 infantry. The exact number of men under his orders Caesar does not mention here or elsewhere. According to his own showing, Caesar is hurried into a battle before he knows where he is. Caesar, he says, had everything to do himself, all at the same time,— to unfurl the standard of battle, to give the signal with the trumpet, to get back the soldiers from their work, to call back some who had gone to a distance for stuff to make a rampart, to draw up the army, to address the men, and then to give the word. In that matter of oratory, he only tells them to remember their old valour. The enemy was so close upon them, and so ready for fighting, that they could scarcely put on their helmets and take their shields out of their cases. So great was the confusion that the soldiers could not get to their own ranks, but had to fight as they stood,- under any flag that was nearest to them. There were so many things against them, and especially those thick artificial hedges, which prevented them even from see¬ ing, that it was impossible for them, to fight according to any method, and in consequence there were vicissi¬ tudes of fortune. One is driven to feel that on this occasion Caesar was caught napping. The JSTervii did at times and places seem to be getting the best of it. The ninth and tenth legions pursue one tribe into a river, and then they have to fight them again, and drive them A. c. vol. iv. D 50 THE WAR IN GA UL.—SECOND BOOK. out of the river. The eleventh and eighth, having put to flight another tribe, are attacked on the very river-banks. The twelfth and the seventh have their hands equally full, when Boduognatus, the Servian chief, makes his way into the very middle of the Boman camp. So great is the confusion that the Treviri, who had joined Caesar on this occasion as allies, although reputed the bravest of the cavalry of Gaul, run away home, and declare that the Bomans are conquered. Caesar, how¬ ever, comes to the rescue, and saves his army on this occasion by personal prowess. When he saw how it was going,—“rem esse in angusto,”—how the thing had got itself into the very narrowest neck of a diffi¬ culty, he seizes a sliield from a common soldier,—having come there himself with no shield,—and rushes into the fight. When the soldiers saw him, and saw, too, that what they did was done in his sight, they fought anew, and the onslaught of the enemy was checked. Perhaps readers will wish that they could know how much of all this is exactly true. It reads as though it were true. We cannot in these days understand how one brave man at such a moment should be so much more effective than another, how he should be known personally to the soldiers of an army so large, how Caesar should have known the names of the centurions,—for he tells us that he addresses them by name;—and yet it reads like truth ; and the reader feels that as Caesar would hardly condescend to boast, so neither would he be constrained by any modern feeling of humility from telling any truth of himself. It is as though Minerva were to tell us of some descent which she mad* CjESAR REDUCES THE BELGIAN TRIBES. 51 among the Trojans. The Nervii fight on, "but of course they are driven in flight. The nation is all but de¬ stroyed, so that the very name can but hardly remain ; —so at least we are told here, though we h?ar of them again as a tribe by no means destroyed or powerless. When out of six hundred senators there are but three senators left, when from sixty thousand fighting men the army has been reduced to scarcely five hundred, Caesar throws the mantle of his mercy over the sur¬ vivors. He allows them even to go and live in their own homes, and forbids their neighbours to harass them. There can be no doubt that Caesar nearly got the worst of it in this struggle, and we may surmise that he learned a lesson which was of service to him in subsequent campaigns. But there are still certain Aduatici to be disposed of before the summer is over,—people who had helped the Nervii,—who have a city of their own, and who live somewhere in the present Namur district.* At first they fight a little round the walls of their town; but when they see what terrible instruments Caesar * These people were the descendants of those Cimbri who, half a century before, had caused such woe to Rome ! The Cimbri, we are told, had gone forth from their lands, and had been six times victorious over Roman armies, taking possession of “our Pro¬ vince,” and threatening Italy and Rome. The whole empire of the Republic had been in danger, but was at last saved by the courage, skill, and rapidity of Marius. In going forth from their country they had left a remnant behind with such of their possessions as they could not carry with them ; and these Aduatici were the children and grandchildren of that remnant. Ciesar doubtless remembered it all. 52 THE WAR IH OAUL.—SECOKD BOOK. has, by means of which to get at them over their very walls,—how he can build up a great turret at a distance, which, at that distance, is ludicrous to them, but which he brings near to them, so that it overhangs them, from which to harass them with arrows and stones, and against which, so high is it, they have no defence— then they send out and beg for mercy. Surely, they say, Caesar and the Romans must have more than human power. They will give up everything, if only Caesar out of his mercy will leave to them their arms. They are always at war with all their neighbours; and where would they be without arms 1 Caesar replies. Merits of their own they have none. How could a tribe have merits against which Caesar was at war 1 Nevertheless, such being his custom, he will admit them to some terms of grace if they sur¬ render before his battering - ram has touched their walls. But as for their arms, surely they must be joking with him. Of course their arms must be sur¬ rendered. What he had done for the Nervii he would do for them. He would tell their neighbours not to hurt them. They agree, and throw their arms into the outside ditch of the town, but not quite all their arms. A part,—a third,—are cunningly kept back ; and when Caesar enters the town, they who have kept their arms, and others unarmed, try to escape from the town. They fight, and some thousands are slain. Others are driven back, and these are sold for slaves. Who, we wonder, could have been the purchasers, and at what price on that day was a man to be bought in the city of the Aduatici? CJ2SAR REDUCES THE BELGIAN TRIBES. 53 Then Csesar learns through his lieutenant, young Crassus, the son of his colleague in the triumvirate, that all the Belgian states, from the Scheldt to the Bay of Biscay, have been reduced beneath the yoke of the Homan people. The Germans, too, send ambassadors to him, so convinced are they that to fight against him is of no avail,—so wonderful an idea of this last war has pervaded all the tribes of barbarians. But Caesar is in a hurry, and can hear no ambassadors now. He wants to get into Italy, and they must come again to him next summer. Bor all which glorious doings a public thanksgiving of fifteen days is decreed, as soon as the news is heard in Rome. CHAPTER IV. THIRD BOOK OF THE WAR IN GAUL.—C2ESAR SUBDUES THE WESTERN TRIBES OF GAUL.— B.C. 56 . In tlie first few lines of the third book we learn that Caesar had an eye not only for conquest, hut for the advantages of conquest also. When he went into Italy at the end of the last campaign, he sent one Galba, whose descendant became emperor after Hero, with the twelfth legion, to take up his winter quarters in the upper valley of the Rhone, in order that an easier traffic might be opened to traders passing over the Alps in and out of Northern Italy. It seems that the passage used was that of the Great St Bernard, and Galba placed himself with his legion at that junction of the valley which we all know so well as Martigny. Here, however, he was attacked furiously in his camp by the inhabitants of the valley, who probably objected to being dictated to as to the amount of toll to be charged upon the travelling traders, and was very nearly destroyed. The Romans, however, at last, when they had neither weapons nor food left for maintaining their camp, resolved to cut their way through their enemies. Tliis they did so effectually that they slaughtered more CJSSAR MAKES LITTLE OF DIFFICULTIES. 55 than ten thousand men, and the other twenty thou¬ sand of Swiss warriors all took to flight ! Nevertheless Galba thought it as well to leave that inhospitable region, in which it was almost impossible to find food for the winter, and took himself down the valley and along the lake to the Roman Province. He made his winter-quarters among the Allobroges, who belonged to the Province,—a people living just south of the present Lyons. How the Allobroges liked it we are not told, but we know that they were then very faithful, al¬ though in former days they had given great trouble. Their position made faith to Rome almost a necessity. Whether, in such a position, Caesar’s lieutenants paid their way, and bought their corn at market price, we do not know. It was Caesar’s rule, no doubt, to make the country on which his army stood support his army. When the number of men whom Caesar took with liim into countries hitherto unknown to him or his army is considered, and the apparently reckless au- • dacity with which he did so, it must be acknowledged that he himself says very little about his difficulties. He must constantly have had armies for which to provide twice as large as our Crimean army,—probably as large as the united force of the English and French in the Crimea; and he certainly could not bring with him what he wanted in ships. The road from Bala¬ clava up to the heights over Sebastopol, we know, was very bad ; but it was short. The road from the foot of the Alps in the Roman province to the countries with which we were dealing in the last chapter could not, we should say, have been very good two thousand 56 THE WAR IN GAUL.—THIRD BOOK. years ago, and it certainly was very long;—nearly a hundred miles for Caesar to every single one of those that were so terrible to us in the Crimea. Caesar, however, carried but little with him beyond his arms and implements of war, and of those the heaviest lie no doubt made as he went. The men had an allow¬ ance of corn per da} 7 , besides so much pay. We are told that the pay before Caesar’s time was 100 asses a-month for the legionaries,—the as being less than a penny,—and that this was doubled by Caesar. We can conceive that the money troubled him compara¬ tively slightly, but that the finding of the daily corn and forage for so large a host of men and horses must have been very difficult. He speaks of the difficulty often, but never with that despair which was felt as to the roasting of our coffee in the Crimea. We hear of his waiting till forage should have grown, and sometimes there are necessary considerations “ de re frumentaria,” —-about that great general question of provisions ; but of crushing difficulties very little is said, and of bad roads not a word. One great advantage Caesar certainly had over Lord Raglan;—he was his own special cor* respondent. Coffee his men certainly did not get; but if their corn were not properly roasted for them, and if, as would be natural, the men grumbled, he had with him no licensed collector of grumbles to make public the sufferings of his men. And now, when this affair of Galba’s had been finished,—when Caesar, as he tells us, really did think that all Gaul was “ pacatam,” tranquillised, or at least subdued,—the Belgians conquered, the Germans driven CAESAR SUBDUES TUE WESTERN TRIBES. 57 off, those Swiss fellows cut to pieces in the valley of the Rhone; when he thought that he might make a short visit into that other province of his, Illyricum, so that he might see what that was like,—he is told that another war has sprung up in Gaul! Young Crassus, with that necessity which of course was on him of providing winter food for the seventh legion which he had been ordered to take into Aquitania, has been obliged to send out for corn into the neighbouring countries. Of course a well-instructed young general, such as was Crassus, had taken hostages before he sent his men out among strange and wild barbarians. Rut in spite of that, the Yeneti, a maritime people of an¬ cient Brittany, just in that country of the Morbihan whither we now go to visit the works of the Druids at Carnac and Locmariaker, absolutely detained his two ambassadors —so called afterwards, though in his first mention of them Caesar names them as praefects and tribunes of the soldiers. Yannes, the capital of the department of the Morbihan, gives us a trace of the name of this tribe. The Yeneti, who were powerful in ships, did not see why they should give their corn to Crassus. Caesar, when he hears that ambassadors, — sacred ambassadors, — have been stopped, is filled with shame and indignation, and hurries off himself to look after the affair, having, as we may imagine, been able to see very little of Illyricum. This horror of Caesar in regard to his ambassadors,— in speaking of which he alludes to what the Gauls themselves felt when they came to understand what a thing they had done in making ambassadors prisoners. 58 THE WAR IN GAUL.—THIRD BOOR . —“ legatos,”—a name that has always been held sacred and inviolate among all nations,—is very great, and makes him feel that he must really he in earnest. We are reminded of the injunctions, printed in Spanish, which the Spaniards distributed among the Indians of the continent, in the countries now called Venezuela and Hew Granada, explaining to the people, who knew nothing of Spanish or of printing, how they were hound to obey the orders of a distant king, who had the authority of a more distant Pope, who again,—so they claimed,—was delegated by a more distant God. The pain of history consists in the injustice of the wolf towards the lamb, joined to the conviction that thus, and no otherwise, could the lamb be brought to better than a sheepish mode of existence ! But Csesar was in earnest.* The following is a translation of the tenth section of this book; “There were these diffi¬ culties in carrying on the war which we have above shown.”—He alludes to the maritime capacities of the people whom he desires to conquer.—“ Many things, nevertheless, urged Caesar on to this war;—the wrongs of those Boman knights who had been detained, rebel¬ lion set on foot after an agreed surrender,”—that any * And Cresar was no doubt indignant as well as earnest, though, perhaps, irrational in his indignation. We know how sacred was held to be the person of the Roman citizen, and remember Cicero’s patriotic declaration, “ Facinus est vinciri civem Romanum,—scelus verberari; ” and again, the words which Horace puts into the mouth of Regulus when he asserts that the Roman soldier must be lost for ever in his shame, and useless, “Qui lora restiictis lacertis Sensit iners timuitque mortem.” CAESAR SUBDUES THE WESTERN TRIBES. 59 such, surrender had been made we do not hear, though we do hear, incidentally, that Crassus had taken hos¬ tages ;—“ a falling off from alliance after hostages had been given; conspiracy among so many tribes; and then this first consideration, that if this side of the country were disregarded, the other tribes might learn to think that they might take the same liberty. Then, when he bethought himself that, as the Gauls were prone to rebellion, and were quickly and easily excited to war, and that all men, moreover, are fond of liberty and hate a condition of subjection, he resolved that it would be well, rather than that other states should conspire,”—and to avoid the outbreak on behalf of free¬ dom which might thus probably be made,—“ that his army should be divided, and scattered about more widely.” Treating all Gaul as a chess-board, he sends round to provide that the Treviri should be kept quiet. Readers will remember how far Treves is distant from the extremities of Brittany. The Belgians are to be looked to, lest they should rise and come and help. The Germans are to be prevented from crossing the Rhine. Labienus, who, during the Gallic wars, w r as Caesar’s general highest in trust, is to see to all this. Crassus is to go back into Aquitania and keep the south quiet. Titurius Sabinus, destined afterwards to a sad end, is sent with three legions,—eighteen thousand men, —among the neighbouring tribes of Northern Brittany and Normandy. “Young” Decimus Brutus,—Caesar speaks of him with that kind affection which the epithet conveys, and we remember, as we read, that this Brutus appears afterwards in history as one of Caesar’s slayers, 6C THE WAR IN GAUL.—THIRD BOOR . in conjunction with his greater namesake,—young De* cimus Brutus, the future conspirator in Rome, has con¬ fided to him the fleet which is to destroy these much less guilty distant conspirators, and Caesar himself takes the command of his own legions on the spot. All this is told in fewer words than are here used in describing the telling, and the reader feels that he has to do with a mighty man, whose eyes are everywhere, and of whom an ordinary enemy would certainly say, Surely this is no man, but a god. He tells us how great was the effect of his own presence on the shore, though the battle was carried on under young Brutus at sea. “ What remained of the conflict,” he says, after describing their manoeuvres, “ depended on valour, in which our men were far away the superior; and this was more especially true be¬ cause the affair was carried on so plainly in the sight of Caesar and the whole army that no brave deed could pass unobserved. For all the hills and upper lands, from whence the view down upon the sea was close, were covered by the army.” Of course he conquers the Yeneti and other sea-going tribes, even on their own element. Whereupon they give themselves and all their belongings up to Caesar. Caesar, desirous that the rights of ambassadors shall hereafter be better respected among barbarians, deter¬ mines that he must use a little severity. “Gravius vindicandum statuit; ”—“ he resolved that the offence should be expiated with more than ordinary punish¬ ment.” Consequently, he kills all the senate, and sells all the other men as slaves ! The pithy brevity, the CJESAR SUBDUES THE WESTERN TRIBES. G1 unapologetic dignity of the sentence, as he pronounced it and tells it to us, is heartrending, hut, at this dis¬ tance of time, delightful also. “ Itaque, omni senatu necato, reliquos sub corona vendidit; ”—“ therefore, all the senate having been slaughtered, he sold the other citizens with chaplets on their heads ; ”—it being the Roman custom so to mark captives in war intended for sale. We can see him as he waves his hand and passes on. Surely he must be a god ! His generals in this campaign are equally successful. One Yiridovix, a Gaul up in the Normandy country,— somewhere about Avranches or St Lo, we may imagine, — is entrapped into a fight, and destroyed with his army. Aquitania surrenders herself to Crassus, after much fighting, and gives up her arms. Then Caesar reflects that the Morin i and the Menapii had as yet never bowed their heads to him. Boulogne and Calais stand in the now well-known territory of the Morini, but the Menapii lie a long way off, up among the mouths of the Scheldt and the Rhine,—the Low Countries of modern history,—an uncomfortable people then, who would rush into their woods and marshes after a spell of fighting, and who seemed to have no particular homes or cities that could be at¬ tacked or destroyed. It was nearly the end of summer just now, and the distance between, let us say, Yannes in Brittany, and Breda, or even Antwerp, seems to us tc be considerable, when we remember the condition of the country, and the size of Caesar’s army. But he had a few weeks to fill up, and then he might feel that all Gaul had been “ pacified.” At present there was this 62 THE WAR IN GAUL.—THIRD BOOR. haughty little northern corner. “ Omni Gallia pacata, Morini Menapiique supererant; ”■—“ all Gaul having been pacified, the Morini and Menapii remained.” He was, moreover, no doubt beginning to reflect that from the Morini could be made the shortest journey into that wild Ultima Thule of an island in which lived the Britanni. Caesar takes advantage of the few weeks, and attacks these uncomfortable people. When they retreat into the woods, he cuts the woods down. He does cut down an immense quantity of wood, but the enemy only recede into thicker and bigger woods. Bad weather comes on, and the soldiers can no longer endure life in their skin tents. Let us fancy these Italians encounter¬ ing winter in undrained Blunders, with no walls or roofs to protect them, and ordered to cut down interminable woods! Had a ‘Times’ been then written and filed, in¬ stead of a “Commentary” from the hands of the General- in-chief, we should probably have heard of a good deal of suffering. As it is, we are only told that Csesar had. to give up his enterprise for that year. He therefore burned all their villages, laid waste all their fields, and then took his army down into a more comfortable re¬ gion south of the Seine, and there put them into winter quarters,—net much to the comfort of the people there residing. CHAPTER V. FOURTH BOOK OF THE WAR IN GAUL.—CiESAR CROSSES THB RHINE, SLAUGHTERS THE GERMANS, AND GOES INTO BRITAIN.—B.C. 55 . In the next year certain Germans, TJsipetes and others, crossed the Rhine into Ganl, not far from the sea, as Caesar tells us. He tells us again, that when he drove the Germans hack over the river, it was near the confluence of the Meuse and the Rhine. When we remember how difficult it was for Caesar to obtain information, we must acknowledge that his geography as to the passage of the Rhine out to the sea, and of the junction of the Rhine and the Meuse by the Waal, is wonderfully correct. The spot indicated as that at which the Germans were driven into the river would seem to be near Bommel in Holland, where the Waal and the Meuse join their waters, at the head of the island* of Bommel, where Fort St Andrt$ stands, or stood.* * Caesar speaks of the confluence of the Rhine and the “Mosa” as the spot at which he drove the Germans into the river,—and in various passages, speaking of the Mosa, clearly means the Meuse. It appears, however, to be the opinion of English scholars who have studied the topography of Caesar’s 64 THE WAR IN GAUL.-FOURTH BOOK. Those wonderful Suevi, among whom the men alternately fight and plough, year and year about, caring more, however, for cattle than they do for corn, who are socialists in regard to land, having no private property in their fields,—who, all of therm from their youth upwards, do just what they please,—large, bony men, who wear, even in these cold regions, each simply some scanty morsel of skin covering,—who bathe in rivers all the year through, who deal with traders only to sell the spoils of war, who care but little for their horses, and ride, when they do ride, without saddles,—think¬ ing nothing of men to whom such delicate appendages are necessary,—who drink no wine, and will have no neighbours near them,—these ferocious Suevi have driven other German tribes over the Rhine into Gaul. Caesar, hearing this, is filled with apprehension. He knows the weakness of his poor friends the Gauls,— how prone they are to gossiping, of what a restless tem¬ per. It is in the country of the Menapii, the tribe with which he did not quite finish his little affair in the last chapter, that these Germans are settling; and there is no knowing what trouble the intruders may give him if he allows them to make themselves at home on that campaigns with much labour, that the confluence of the Moselle and Rhine, from which Coblentz derives its name, is the spot intended. Napoleon, who has hardly made himself an autho¬ rity on the affairs of Caesar generally, hut who is thought to be an authority in regard to topography, holds to the opinion that the site in Holland is intended to be described. Readers who are anxious on the subject can ehoose between the two ; but readers who are not anxious will probably he more numer¬ ous. CjESAR DRIVES THE GERMANS OUT OF GAUL. 65 side of the river. So he hurries off to give help to the poor Menapii. Of course there is a sending of ambassadors. The Germans acknowledge that they have been turned out of their own lands by their brethren, the Suevi, who are better men than they are. But they profess that, in fighting, the Suevi, and the Suevi only, are their masters. Not even the immortal gods can stand against the Suevi. But they also are Germans, and are not at all afraid of the Romans. But in the pro¬ position which they make they show some little awe. Will Caesar allow them to remain where they are, or allot to them some other region on that side of the Rhine 1 Caesar tells them that they may go and live, if they please, with the Ubii,—another tribe of Germans who occupy the Rhine country, probably where Cologne now stands, or perhaps a little north of it, and who seem already to have been forced over the Rhine,—they, or some of them,—and to have made good their footing somewhere in the region in which Charlemagne built his church, now called Aix-la-Chapelle. There they are, Germans still, and probably are so because these Ubii made good their footing. The Ubii also are in trouble with the Suevi; and if these intruders will go and join the Ubii, Caesar will make it all straight for them. The intruders hesitate, but do not go, and at last attack Caesar’s cavalry, not without some success. During this fight there is double treachery,—first on the part of the Germans, and then on Caesar’s part,—which is chiefly memorable for the attack made on Caesar in Rome. It was in consequence of the deceit here a. c. voh iv. K 66 the WAR IN GAUL.—FOURTH BOOK. practised that it was proposed "by his enemies in the city that he should he given up by the Republic to the foe. Had any such decree been passed, it would not have been easy to give up Caesar. The Germans are, of course, beaten, and they are driven into the river on those low and then undrained regions in which the Rhine and the Meuse and the Waal confuse themselves and confuse travellers;— either here, or much higher up the river at Coblentz, hut the reader will already have settled that question for himself at the beginning of the chapter. Ca3sar speaks of these Germans as though they were all drowned, — men, women, and children. They had brought their entire families with them, and, when the lighting went against them, with their entire families they fled into the river. Caesar was pursuing them after the battle, and they precipitated themselves over the banks. There, overcome by fear, fatigue, and the waters, they perished. There was computed to be a hundred and eighty thousand of them who were destroyed ; but the Roman army was safe to a man.* Then Caesar made up his mind to cross the river. It seems that he had no intention of extending the empire of the Republic into what he called Germany, but that he thought it necessary to frighten the Ger¬ mans. The cavalry of those intruding Usipetes had, luckily for them, been absent, foraging over the river ; and he now sent to the Sigambri, among whom they * “ Hostium numerus capitum CDXXX millium fuisset,” from which words we are led to suppose that there were 180,000 fighting men, besides the women and children. CJSSAR DRIVES THE GERMANS OUT OF GAUL. G7 had taken refuge, desiring that these horsemen should be given up to him. But the Sigambri will not obey. The Germans seem to have understood that Caesar had Gaul in his hands, to do as he liked with it; but they grudged his interference beyond the Rhine. Caesar, however, always managed to have a set of friends among his enemies, to help him in adjusting his enmities. We have heard of the iEdui in central Gaul, and of the Remi in the north. The Ubii were his German friends, who were probably at this time occupying both banks of the river; and the Ubii ask him just to come over and frighten their neighbours. Caesar resolves upon gratifying them. And as it is not consistent either with his safety or with his dignity to cross the river in boats, he determines to build a bridge. Is there a schoolboy in England, or one who has been a schoolboy, at any Caesar-reading school, who does not remember those memorable words, “ Tigna bina sesquipedalia,” with which Caesar begins his graphic account of the building of the bridge ] When the breadth of the river is considered, its rapidity, and the difficulty which there must have been in finding tools and materials for such a construction, in a country so wild and so remote from Roman civilisation, the creation of this bridge fills us with admiration for Caesar’s spirit and capacity. He drove down piles into the bed of the river, two and two, prone against the stream. We could do that now, though hardly as quickly as Caesar did it; but we should want coffer-dams and steam-pumps, patent rammers, and a clerk of the works. He explains to us that he so built the foun- GS THE WAR IN GAUL.—FOURTH BOOK. dations that the very strength of the stream added to their strength and consistency. In ten days the whole thing was done, and the army carried over. Caesar does not tell us at what suffering, or with the loss of how many men. It is the simplicity of everything which is so wonderful in these Commentaries. We have read of works constructed by modern armies, and of works which modern armies could not construct. We remember the road up from Balaclava, and the railway which was sent out from England. We know, too, what are the aids and appliances with which science has furnished us. But yet in no modern warfare do the difficulties seem to have been so light, so little worthy of mention, as they were to Caesar. He made his bridge and took over his army, cavalry and all, in ten days. There must have been difficulty and hard¬ ship, and the drowning, we should fear, of many men; but Caesar says nothing of all this. Ambassadors immediately are sent. Erom the mo¬ ment in which the bridge was begun, the Sigambri ran away and hid themselves in the woods. Caesar burns all their villages, cuts down all their corn, and travels down into the country of the Ubii. He comforts them ; and tidings of his approach then reach those terrible Suevi. They make ready for war on a grand scale; but Caesar, reflecting that he had not brought his army over the river for the sake of fighting the Suevi, and telling us that he had already done enough for honour and for the good of the cause, took his army back after eighteen days spent in the journey, and destroyed his bridge. CJ5SAR INVADES BRITAIN. 69 Then comes a passage which makes a Briton vacil¬ late between shame at bis own ancient insignificance, and anger at Caesar’s misapprehension of his ancient character. There were left of the fighting season after Caesar came hack across the Rhine just a few weeks; and what can he do better with them than go over and conquer Britannia? This first record of an invasion upon us comes in at the fag-end of a chapter, and the invasion was made simply to fill up the summer ! No¬ body, Caesar tells us, seemed to know anything about the island; and yet it was the fact that in all his wars with the Gauls, the Gauls were helped by men out of Britain. Before he will face the danger with his army he sends over a trusty messenger, to look about and find out something as to the coasts and harbours. The trusty messenger does not dare to disembark, but comes back and tells Caesar what he has seen from his ship. Caesar, in the mean time, has got together a great fleet somewhere in the Boulogne and Calais country; and, —so he says,—messengers have come to him from Britain, whither rumours of his purpose have already flown, saying that they will submit themselves to the Roman Republic. We may believe just as much of that as we please. But he clearly thinks less of the Boulogne and Calais people than he does even of the Britons, which is a comfort to us. When these peo¬ ple,—then called Morini,—came to him, asking pardon for having dared to oppose him once before, and offer¬ ing any number of hostages, and saying that they had been led on by bad advice, Caesar admitted them into some degree of grace; not wishing, as he tells us, to be 70 THE WAR IN GAUL.—FOURTH ROOK. kept rat of Britain by the consideration of such very small affairs. “Nequehas tantularum rerum occupa- tiones sibi Britannise anteponendas judicabat.” We hope that the Boulogne and Calais people understand and appreciate the phrase. Having taken plenty of hostages, he determines to trust the Boulogne and Calais people, and prepares his ships for passing the Channel. He starts nearly at the third watch,—about midnight, we may presume. A portion of his army,— the cavalry,—encounter some little delay, such as has often occurred on the same spot since, even to travel¬ lers without horses. He himself got over to the British coast at about the fourth hour. This, at mid¬ summer, would have been about a quarter past eight. As it was now late in the summer, it may have been nine o’clock in the morning when Csesar found him¬ self under the cliffs of Kent, and saw our armed ances¬ tors standing along all the hills ready to meet him. He stayed at anchor, waiting for his ships, till about two p.m. His cavalry did not get across till four days afterwards. Having given his orders, and found a fitting moment and a fitting spot, Csesar runs his ships up upon the beach. Csesar confesses to a good deal of difficulty in getting ashore. When we know how very hard it is to ac¬ complish the same feat, on the same coast, in these days, with all the appliances of modern science to aid us, and, as we must presume, with no real intention on the part of the Cantii, or men of Kent, to oppose our landing, we can quite sympathise with Csesar. The ships were so big that they could not be brought CMS A R INVADES BRITAIN. 71 into very shallow water. The Roman soldiers were compelled to jump into the sea, heavily armed, and there to fight with the waves and with the enemy. But the Britons, having the use of all their limbs, knowing the ground, standing either on the shore or just running into the shallows, made the landing un¬ easy enough. “hTostri,”—our men,—says Caesar, with all these things against them, were not all of them so alert at fighting as was usual with them on dry ground; —at which no one can he surprised. Caesar had two kinds of ships — “naves longae,” long ships for carrying soldiers; and “ naves oner- arise,” ships for carrying burdens. The long ships do not seem to have been such ships of war as the Romans generally used in their sea-fights, hut were handier, and more easily worked, than the trans¬ ports. These he laid broadside to the shore, and harassed the poor natives with stones and arrows. Then the eagle-hearer of the tenth legion jumped into the sea, proclaiming that he, at any rate, would do his dut}’’. Unless they wished to see their eagle fall into the hands of the enemy, they must follow him. “ Jump down, he said, my fellow-sol¬ diers, unless you wish to betray your eagle to the enemy. I at least will do my duty to the Republic and to our General. When he had said this with a loud voice, he threw himself out of the ship and advanced the eagle against the enemy.” Seeing and hearing this, the men leaped forth freely, from that ship and from others. As usual, there was some sharp fighting. Pugnatum est ab utrisque acriter.” It is 72 THE WAR IN GAUL.—FOURTH BOOK. nearly always the same thing. Csesar throws away none of his glory by underrating his enemy. But at length the Britons fly. “ This thing only was wanting to Caesar’s usual good fortune,”—that he was deficient in cavalry wherewith to ride on in pursuit, and “ take the island ! ” Considering how very short a time he remains in the island, we feel that his com¬ plaint against fortune is hardly well founded. But there is a general surrender, and a claiming of hos¬ tages, and after a few days a sparkle of new hope in the breasts of the Britons. A storm arises, and Caesar’s ships are so knocked about that he does not know how he will get back to Gaul. He is troubled by a very high tide, not understanding the nature of these tides. As he had only intended this for a little tentative trip,—a mere taste of a future war with Britain,—he had brought no large supply of corn with him. He must get back, by hook or by crook. The Britons, seeing how it is with him, think that they can destroy him, and make an attempt to do so. The seventh legion is in great peril, having been sent out to find corn, but is rescued. Certain of his ships,—those which had been most grievously handled by the storm,—he breaks up, in order that he mav mend the others with their mate- rials. When we think how long it takes us to mend ships, having dockyards, and patent slips, and all things ready, this is most marvellous to us. But he does mend his ships,' and while so doing he has a second fight with the Britons, and again repulses them. There is a burning and destroying of everything far and wide, a gathering of ambassadors to Csesar asking CAESAR INVADES BRITAIN. 73 for terms, a demand for hostages,—a double number of hostages now,—whom Caesar desired to have sent over to him to Gaul, because at this time of the year be did not choose to trust them to ships that were unsea¬ worthy; and he himself, with all his army, gets hack into the Boulogne and Calais country. Two trans¬ ports only are missing, which are carried somewhat lower down the coast. There are hut three hundred men in these transports, and these the Morini of those parts threaten to kill unless they will give up their arms. But Caesar sends help, and even these three hundred are saved from disgrace. There is, of course, more burning of houses and laying waste of fields be¬ cause of this little attempt, and then Caesar puts his army into winter quarters. What would have been the difference to the world if the Britons, as they surely might have done, had destroyed Caesar and every Roman, and not left even a ship to get back to Gaul 1 In lieu of this Caesar could send news to Rome of these various victories, and have a public thanksgiving decreed,—on this occasion for twenty days. CHAPTER YT. FIFTH BOOK OF 7 HE WAR IN GAUL.—CESAR’S SECOND INVASION OF BRITAIN.—THE GAULS RISE AGAINST HIM.—B.C. 54 . On his return out of Britain, Caesar, as usual, went over the Alps to look after his other provinces, and to attend to his business in Italy; hut he was determined to make another raid upon the island. He could not yet assume that he had “ taken it,” and therefore he left minute instructions with his generals as to the building of more ships, and the repair of those which had been so nearly destroyed. He sends to Spain, he tells us, for the things necessary to equip his ships. We never hear of any difficulty about money. We know that he did obtain large grants from Rome for the support of his legions; but no scruple was made in making war maintain war, as far as such mainten¬ ance could be obtained. Caesar personally was in an extremity of debt when he commenced his campaigns. He had borrowed an enormous sum, eight hundred and thirty talents, or something over £200,000, from Crassus,—who was specially the rich Roman of those days,—before he could take charge of his Spanish pro¬ vince. When his wars were over, he returned to Rome CuESAR'S SECOND INVASION OF BRITAIN. 75 ■with a great treasure; and indeed during these wars in Gaul he expended large sums in bribing Romans. We may suppose that he found hoards among the barbarians, as Lord Clive did in the East Indies. Clive contented himself with taking some: Caesar probably took all. Having given the order about his ships, he settled a little matter in Illyricum, taking care to raise some tribute there also. He allows but a dozen lines for recording this winter work, and then tells us that he hurried back to his army and his ships. His command had been so well obeyed in regard to vessels, that he finds ready, of that special sort which he had ordered with one bank of oars only on each side, as many as six hundred, and twenty-eight of the larger sort. He gives his soldiers very great credit for their exertions, and sends his fleet to the Portus Itius. The exact spot which Caesar called by this name the geographers have not identified, but it is supposed to be between Boulogne and Calais. It may probably have been at Wissant. Having seen that things were thus ready for a second trip into Britain, he turns round and hurries off with four legions and eight hundred cavalry,—an army of 25,000 men,—into the Treves country. There is a quarrel going on there be¬ tween two chieftains which it is well that he should settle,—somewhat as the monkey settled the contest about the oyster. This, however, is a mere nothing of an affair, and he is back again among his ships at the Portus Itius in a page and a half. He resolves upon taking five legions of his own 76 THE WAR IN GAEL.—FIFTH BOOR. soldiers into Britain, and two thousand mounted Gauls. He had brought together four thousand of these horse¬ men, collected from all Gaul, their chiefs and nobles, not only as fighting allies, but as hostages that the tribes should not rise in rebellion while his back was turned. These he divides, taking half with him, and leaving half with three legions of his own men, under Labienus, in the Boulogne country, as a base to his army, to look after the provisions, and to see that he be not harassed on his return. There is a little affair, however, with one of the Gaulish chieftains, Dumnorix the Hkluan, who ought to have been his fastest friend. Dumnorix runs away with all the iEduan horsemen. Caesar, however, sends after him and has him killed, and then all things are ready. He starts with altogether more than 800 ships at sun¬ set, and comes over with a gentle south-west wind. He arrives off the coast of Britain at about noon, but can see none of the inhabitants on the cliff. He imagines that they have all fled, frightened by the number of his ships. Caesar establishes his camp, and proceeds that same night about twelve miles into the country, —eleven miles, we may say, as our mile is longer than the Roman,—and there he finds the Britons. There is some fighting, after which Caesar returns and fortifies his camp. Then there comes a storm and knocks his ships about terribly,—although he had found, as he thought, a nice soft place for them. But the tempest is very violent, and they are torn away from their anchors, and thrust upon the shore, and dashed against each other till there is infinite trouble. He is obliged CAESAR'S SECOND INVASION OF BRITAIN. 77 to send over to Labienus, telling him to build more ships; and those which are left he drags up over the shore to his camp, in spite of the enormous labour re¬ quired in doing it. He is ten days at this work, night and day, and we may imagine that his soldiers had not an easy time of it. When this has been done, he advances again into the country after the enemy, and finds that Cassivellaunus is in command of the united forces of the different tribes. Cassivellaunus comes from the other side of the. Thames, over in Middlesex or Hertfordshire. The Britons had not hitherto lived very peaceably together, but now they agree that against the Romans they will act in union under Cassivellaunus. Caesar’s description of the island is very interesting. The interior is inhabited by natives, — or rather by “ aborigines.” Caesar states this at least as the tra¬ dition of the country. But the maritime parts are held by Belgian immigrants, who, for the most part, have brought with them from the Continent the names of their tribes. The population is great, and the houses, built very like the houses in Gaul, are numerous and very thick together. The Britons have a great deal of cattle. They use money, having either copper coin or iron rings of a great weight. Tin is found in the middle of the island, and, about the coast, iron. But the quantity of iron found is small. Brass they import. They have the same timber as in Gaul,—only they have neither beech nor fir. Hares and chickens and geese they think it wrong to eat; but they keep these animals as pets. The climate, on the whole, is milder than in Gaul. The island is triangular. One 78 THE WAR IN GAUL.—FIFTH BOOK. corner, that of Kent, has an eastern and a southern aspect. This southern side of the island he makes 500 miles, exceeding the truth by about 150 miles. Then Coesar becomes a little hazy in his geography,— telling us that the other side, meaning the western line of the triangle, where Ireland lies, verges towards Spain. Ireland, he says, is half the size of Britain, and about the same distance from it that Britain is from Gaul. In the middle of the channel dividing Ireland from Britain there is an island called Mona,—the Isle of Man. There are also some other islands which at midwinter have thirty continuous days of night. Here Caesar becomes not only hazy but mythic. But he explains that he has seen nothing of this himself, although he has ascertained, by scientific measurement, that the nights in Britain are shorter than on the Con¬ tinent. Of course the nights are shorter with us in summer than they are in Italy, and longer in winter. The western coast he makes out to be 700 miles long; in saying which he is nearly 100 miles over the mark. The third side he describes as looking towards the north. He means the eastern coast. This he calls 800 miles long, and exaggerates our territories by more than 200 miles. The marvel, however, is that he should be so near the truth. The men of Kent are the most civilised: indeed they are almost as good as Gauls in this respect! What changes does not time make in the comparative merits of countries ! The men in the interior live on flesh and milk, and do not care for corn. They wear skin clothing. They make themselves hor¬ rible with woad, and go about with rery long hair. CjESAR'S SECOND INVASION OF BRITAIN . 79 They shave close, except the head and upper lip. Then comes the worst liahit of all;—ten or a dozen men have their wives in common between them. We have a very vivid and by no means unflattering account of the singular agility of our ancestors in their mode of fighting from their chariots. “ This,” says Caesar, “ is the nature of their chariot-fighting. They first drive rapidly about the battle-field,—“per omnes partes,”—and throw their darts, and frequently dis¬ order the ranks by the very terror occasioned by the horses and by the noise of the wheels ; and when they have made their way through the bodies of the cavalry, they jump down and fight on foot. Then the charioteers go a little out of the battle, and so place their chariots that they may have a ready mode of returning should their friends be pressed by the number of their enemies. Thus they unite the rapidity of cavalry and the stabil¬ ity of infantry; and so effective do they become by daily use and practice, that they are accustomed to keep their horses, excited as they are, on their legs on steep and precipitous ground, and to manage and turn them very quickly, and to run along the pole and stand upon the yoke,”—by which the horses were held together at the collars,—“ and again with the greatest rapidity to re¬ turn to the chariot.” * All which is very wonderful. Of course there is a great deal of fighting, and the * All well-instructed modern Britons have learned from the old authorities that the Briton war-chariots were furnished with scythes attached to the axles,—from Pomponius Mela, the Roman geographer, and from Mrs Markham, among others. And Eugene Sue, in his novel translated into English under the name of the 1 Rival Races,’ explains how the Bretons on the other side of 80 THE WAR IN GAUL.—FIFTH BOOK. Britons soon learn by experience to avoid general engagements and maintain guerilla actions. Ccesar by degrees makes his way to the Thames, and with great difficulty gets his army over it. He can only do this at one place, and that badly. The site of this ford he does not describe to us. It is supposed to have been near the place which we now know as Sunbury. He does tell us that his men were so deep in the water that their heads only were above the stream. But even thus they were so impetuous in their onslaught, that the Britons would not wait for them on the opposite bank, but ran away. Soon there come unconditional surrender, and hostages, and promises of tribute. Cassivellaunus, who is himself but a usurper, and therefore has many enemies at home, endeavours to make himself secure in a strong place or town, which is supposed to have been on or near the site of our St Albans. Caesar, however, explains that the poor Britons give the name of a town,—“ oppidum,” —to a spot in which they have merely surrounded some thick woods with a ditch and rampart. Caesar, of course, drives them out of their woodland fortress, and then there quickly follows another surrender, more hostages, and the demand for tribute. Caesar leaves his orders behind him, as though to speak were to be obeyed. One Mandubratius, and not Cassivellaunus, the water, in the Morbihan, used these scythes ; and how, before a battle with Caesar's legions, the wives of the warriors arranged the straps so that the scythes might be worked from the chariot like oars from a boat. But Caesar says nothing of such scythes, and surely he would have done so had he seen them. The readej must choose between Caesar’s silence and the authority of Pom- ponius Mela, Mrs Markham, and Eugene Sue. CAESAR'S SECOND INVASION OF BRITAIN. 81 is to be tlie future king in Middlesex and Hertford¬ shire,—that is, over the Trinobantes who live there. He fixes tlie amount of tribute to be sent annually by the Britons to Rome; and he especially leaves orders that Cassivellaunus shall do no mischief to the young Mandubratius. Then he crosses back into Gaul at two trips,—his ships taking half the army first and coming back for the other half; and he piously observes that though he had lost many ships when they were com¬ paratively empty, hardly one had been destroyed while his soldiers were in them. So was ended Caesar’s second and last invasion of Britain. That he had reduced Britain as he had re¬ duced Gaul he certainly could not boast;—though Quintus Cicero had written to his brother to say that Britannia was, — “ confecta,”—finished. Though he had twice landed his army under the white cliffs, and twice taken it away with comparative security, he had on both occasions been made to feel how terribly strong an ally to the Britons was that channel which divided them from the Continent. The reader is made to feel that on both occasions the existence of his army and of himself is in the greatest peril. Caesar’s idea in attack¬ ing Britain was probably rather that of making the Gauls believe that his power could reach even beyond them,—could extend itself all round them, even into distant islands,— than of absolutely establishing the Roman dominion beyond that distant sea. The Bri¬ tons had helped the Gauls in their wars with him, and it was necessary that he should punish any who pre¬ sumed to give such help. Whether the orders which a. c. vol. iv. F 82 THE WAR IN GAUL.—FIFTH BOOK. he left behind him were obeyed we do not know; blit we may imagine that the tribute exacted was not sent to home with great punctuality. In fact, Caesar invaded the island twice, but did not reduce it. On his return to Gaul, nearly at the close of the summer, he found himself obliged to distribute his army about the country because of a great scarcity of provisions. There had been a drought, and the crops had failed. Hitherto he had kept his army together during the winter; now he was obliged to divide his legions, placing one with one tribe, and another with another. A legion and a half he stations under two of his generals, L. Titurius Sabinus, and L. Aurunculeius Cotta, among the Eburones, who live on the banks of the Mouse in the Liege and Namur country,—a very stout people, who are still much averse to the dominion of Rome. In this way he thought he might best get over that difficulty as to the scarcity of provisions ; but yet he so well understood the danger of separating his army, that he is careful to tell us that, with the excep¬ tion of one legion which he had stationed in a very quiet country,—among the Essui, where Alengon now stands,—they were all within a hundred miles of each other. Nevertheless, in spite of this precaution, there now fell upon Caesar the greatest calamity which he had ever yet suffered in war. During all these campaigns, the desire of the Gauls to free themselves from the power and the tyranny of Rome never ceased; nor did their intention to do so ever fade away. Caesar must have been to them as a venomous blight, or some evil divinity sent to afflict them for causes which they could not understand. HATRED OF THE GAULS TOWARDS CJ2SAR. 83 There were tribes who truckled to him, hut he had no real friends among them. If any Gauls could have loved him, the AEdui should have done so ; hut that Dumnorix, the iEduan, who ran away with the horse¬ men of his trihe when he was wanted to help in the invasion of Britain, had, before he was killed, tried to defend himself, asserting vociferously that he was a free man and belonging to a free state. He had failed to understand that, in being admitted to the alliance of Caesar, he was bound to obey Caesar. Caesar speaks of it all with his godlike simplicity, as though he saw nothing ungodlike in the work he was doing. There was no touch of remorse in him, as he ordered men to. be slaughtered and villages to be burned. He was able to iook at those things as trifles,—as parts of a great whole. He felt no more than does the gentleman who sends the sheep out of his park to be slaughtered at the appointed time. When he seems to be most cruel, it is for the sake of example,— that some politic result may follow,—that Gauls may know, and Italians know also, that they must bow the knee to Caesar. But the heart of the reader is made to bleed as he sees the unavailing struggles of the tribes. One does not spe¬ cially love the AEdui; but Dumnorix protesting that he will not return, that he is a free man, of a free atate, and then being killed, is a man to be loved. Among the Carnutes, where Chartres now stands, Caesar has set up a pet king, one Tasgetius; but when Ca3sar is away in Britain, the Carnutes kill Tasgetius. They will have no pet of Caesar’s. And now the stout Eburones, who have two kings of their cwn over them, Ambiorix andCativolcus, understanding that Caesar’s d if- 84 THE WAR IN GAUL.—FIFTH BOOK. ficultyis tlieir opportunity,attack the Roman camp,with its legion and a half of men under Titurius and Cotta. Ambiorix, the chieftain, is very crafty. He persuades the Roman generals to send ambassadors to him, and to these he tells his story. He himself, Ambiorix, loves Caesar beyond all things. Has not Caesar done him great kindnesses? He would not willingly lift a hand against Caesar, but he cannot control his state. The facts, however, are thus; an enormous body of Ger¬ mans has crossed the Rhine, and is hurrying on to destroy that Roman camp; and it certainly will be de¬ stroyed, so great is the number of the Germans. Thus says Ambiorix; and then suggests whether it would not be well that Titurius and Cotta with their nine or ten thousand men,—a mere handful of men against all these Germans who are already over the Rhine;—would it not be well that the Romans should go and join some of their brethren, either the legion that is among the Hervii to the east, under Quintus Cicero, the brother of the great orator—or that other legion which Labienus has, a little to the south, on the borders of the Remi and Treviri ? And in regard to a good turn on his own part, so great is the love and veneration which he, Ambiorix, feels for Caesar, that he is quite ready to see the Romans safe through the territories of the Eburones. He begs Titurius and Cotta to think of this, and to allow him to aid them in their escape while escape is possible. The two Roman generals do think of it. Titurius thinks that it will be well to take the advice of Ambiorix. Cotta, and with him many of the tribunes and centurions of the soldiers, think that they should not stir without Caesar’s orders;— THE SUCCESS OF AMBIORIX. 85 think also that there is nothing baser or more foolish in warfare than to act on advice given by an enemy. Titurius, however, is clear for going, and Cotta, aftei much argument and some invective, gives way. Early or the next morning they all leave their camp, taking with them their baggage, and marching forth as though through a friendly country,—apparently with belief in the proffered friendship of Ambiorix. The Eburones had of course prepared an ambush, and the Roman army is attacked both behind and before, and is thrown into utter confusion. The legion, or legion and a half, with its two com¬ manders, is altogether destroyed. Titurius goes out from his ranks to meet Ambiorix, and pray for peace. He is told to throw away his arms, and submitting to the disgrace, casts them down. Then, while Ambiorix is making a long speech, the Roman general is sur¬ rounded and slaughtered. Cotta is killed fighting; as also are more than half the soldiers. The rest get back into the camp at night, and then, despairing of any safety, overwhelmed with disgrace, conscious that there is no place for hope, they destroy themselves. Only a few have escaped during the fighting to tell the tale in the camp of Labienus. As a rule the reader’s sympathies are with the Gauls ; but we cannot help feeling a certain regret that a Roman legion should have thus been wiled on to de¬ struction through the weakness of its general. It Titurius could have been made to suffer alone we should bear it better. When we are told how the gallant eagle-bearer, Petrosidius, throws his eagle into the ram¬ part, and then dies fighting before the camp, we wish 80 THE WAR IN OA UL.--F1FTH BOOK. that Amhiorix had been less successful. Of this, how¬ ever, we feel quite certain, that there will come a day, and that soon, in which Caesar will exact punishment. Having done so much, Amhiorix and the Eburones do not desist. How, if ever, after so great a disgrace, and with legions still scattered, may Caesar he worsted. Q. Cicero is with his legion among the Uervii, and thither Amhiorix goes. The Hervii are quite ready, and Cicero is attacked in his camp. And here, too, for a long while it goes very badly with the Romans ;— so badly that Cicero is hardly able to hold his ramparts against the attacks made upon them by the barbarians. Red-hot balls of clay and hot arrows are thrown into the camp, and there is a fire. The messengers sent to Caesar for help are slain on the road, and the Romans begin to think that there is hardly a chance for them of escape. Unless Caesar be with them they are not safe. All their power, their prestige, their certainty of con¬ quest, lies in Caesar. Cicero behaves like a prudent and a valiant man ; but unless he had at last succeeded in getting a Gaulish slave to take a letter concealed in a dart to Caesar, the enemy would have destroyed him. There is a little episode of two Roman centurions, Pulfius and Varenus, who were always quarrelling as to which, was the better man of the two. Pulfius with much bravado rushes out among the enemy, and Varenus follows him. Pulfius gets into trouble, and Varenus rescues him. Then Varenus is in a difficulty, and Pulfius comes to his assistance. According to all chances of war, both should have been killed ; but both get back safe into the camp ;—and nobody knows from that day to this which was the better man. THE DANGER OF QUINTUS CICERO. 87 Caesar, of course, hastens to the assistance of his lieu¬ tenant, having sent word of his coming by a letter fastened to another dart, which, however, hardly reaches Cicero in time to comfort him before he sees the fires by which the coming legions wasted the country along their line of march. Then there is more fighting. Caesar conquers, and Q. Cicero is rescued from his very disagreeable position. Labienus has also been in difficulty, stationed, as we remember, on the borders of the Treviri. The Treviri were quite as eager to attack him as the Eburones and E T ervii to destroy the legions left in their territories. But before the attack is made, the news of Caesar’s victory, travel¬ ling with wonderful speed, is heard of in those parts, and the Treviri think it best to leave Labienus alone. But Caesar has perceived that, although lie has so often boasted that all Gaul was at last at peace, all Gaul is prepared to carry on the war against him. It is during this winter that he seems to realize a conviction that his presence in the country is not popular with the Gauls in general, and that he lias still much to do before he can make them understand that they are not free men, belonging to free states. The opposition to him has become so general that he himself determines to remain in Gaul all the winter; and even after tell¬ ing us of the destruction of Indutioniarus, the chief of the Treviri,by Labienus, he can only boast that—“Caesar had, after that was done, Gaul a little quieter,”—a little more like a subject country bound hand and toot, —than it was before. During this year Caesar’s pro¬ consular power over his provinces was extended for a second period of five years. CHAPTER YII. SIXTH BOOK OF THE WAR IN GAUL.—CAESAR PURSUES AMBIORIX. —THE MANNERS OF THE GAULS AND OF THE GERMANS ARE CONTRASTED.—B. C. 53 . CiESAR begins tne next campaign before the winter is over, having, as we have seen, been forced to con¬ tinue the last long after the winter had commenced. The Gauls were learning to unite themselves, and things were becoming very serious with him. One Roman army, with probably ten thousand men, had been absolutely destroyed, with its generals Titurius Sabinus and Aurunculeius Cotta. Another under Quintus Cicero would have suffered the same Tate, but for Caesar’s happy intervention. A third under Labienus had been attached. All Gaul had been under arms, or thinking of arms, in the autumn; and though Caesar had been able to report at the end of the campaign that Gaul,—his Gaul, as he intended that it should be,—was a little quieter, nevertheless he under¬ stood well that he still had his work to do before he could enter upon possession. He had already been the master of eight legions in Gaul, containing 48,000 foot- soldiers, levied on the Italian side of the Alps. He CAESAR RECRUITS I1IS ARMY. 89 had added to this a large body of Gaulish cavalry and light infantry, over and above his eight legions. He had now lost an entire legion and a half, besides the gaps which must have been made in Britain, and by the loss of those who had fallen when attacked under Cicero by the Hervii. But he would show the Gauls that when so treated he could begin again, not only with renewed but with increased force. He would astound them by his display of Roman power, “ think¬ ing that, for the future, it would greatly affect the opin¬ ion of Gaul that the power of Italy should be seen to be so great that, if any reverse in war were suffered, not only could the injury be cured in a short time, but that the loss . could be repaired even by increased forces.” He not only levies fresh troops, but borrows a legion which Pompey commands outside the walls of Rome. He tells us that Pompey yields his legion to the “Republic and to Friendship.” The Triumvi¬ rate was still existing, and Ctesar’s great colleague probably felt that he had no alternative. In this way Caesar not only re-established the legion which had been annihilated, but completes the others, and takes the field with two new legions added to his army. He probably now had as many as eighty thousand men under his command. He first makes a raid against our old Iriends the FTervii, who had nearly conquered Cicero before Christmas, and who were already conspiring again with certain German and neighbouring Belgian tribes. The reader will perhaps remember that in the second book this tribe was said to have been so utterly de- 90 THE WAR IN GA UL.—SIXTH BOOK. etroyed that hardly their name remained. That, no doubt, was Csesar’s belief after the great slaughter. There had been, however, enough of them left nearly to destroy Q. Cicero and his legion. Then Caesar goes to Paris,—Lutetia Parisiorum, of which we now hear for the first time,—and, with the help of his friends the HMui and the Pemi, makes a peace with the centre tribes of Gaul, the Senones and Carnutes. Then he resolves upon attacking Ambiorix with all his heart and soul. Ambiorix had destroyed his legion and killed his two generals, and against Ambiorix he must put forth all his force. It is said that when Caesar first heard of that misfortune he swore that he would not cut his hair or shave himself till he was avenged. Put he feels that he must first dispose of those who would naturally be the allies of this much-to-be-persecuted enemy. The Menapii, with whom we may remember that he had never quite settled matters in his former war, and who live on the southern banks of the Meuse not far from the sea, have not even yet sent to him messen¬ gers to ask for peace. He burns their villages, takes their cattle, makes slaves of the men, and then binds them by hostages to have no friendship with Am¬ biorix. In the mean time Labienus utterly defeats the great north-eastern tribe, the Treviri, whom he cun¬ ningly allures into fighting just before they are joined by certain Germans who are coming to aid them. “ Quern Deus vult perdere prius dementat.” These unfortunate Gauls and Germans fall into every trap that is laid for them. The speech which Ca?sar quotes CAESAR BUILDS A SECOND BRIDGE. 91 as having been made by Labienus to his troops on this occasion is memorable. “Now,” says Labienus, “ you have your opportunity. You have got your enemy thoroughly at advantage. That valour which you have so often displayed before the 1 Imperator/ CaBsar, display now under my command. Think that Caesar is present, and that he beholds you.” To have written thus of himself Caesar must have thought of himself as of a god. He tells the story as though it were quite natural that Labienus and the soldiers should so regard him. After this battle, in which the Treviri are of course slaughtered, Caesar makes a second bridge over the Rhine, somewhat above the spot at which he had crossed before. He does this, he says, for two reasons, —first, because the Germans had sent assistance to the Hervii; and secondly, lest his gieat enemy Am- biorix should find shelter among the Suevi. Then he suggests that the opportunity is a good one for saying something to his readers of the different manners of Gaul and of Germany. Among the Gauls, in their tribes, their villages, and even in their families, there are ever two factions, so that one should always balance the other, and neither become superior. Caesar so tells us at this particular point of his narrative, because he is anxious to go back and explain how it was that he had taken the part of the iEdui, and hg.d first come into conflict with the Germans, driving Ariovistus back across the Rhine for their sake. In eastern Gaul two tribes had long balanced each other, nach, of course, striving for mastery,—the iEdui and 92 TEE WAR IN GAUL.—S1XTU BOOK. the Sequani. The Sequani had called in the aid of the Germans, and the iEdui had been very hardly treated. In their sufferings they had appealed to Rome, having had former relations of close amity with the Republic. Divitiacus, their chief magistrate,—the brother of Dumnorix who was afterwards killed by Caesar’s order for running away with the ASduan cavalry before the second invasion of Britain,—had lived for a while in Rome, and had enjoyed Roman friendships, that of Cicero among others. There was a good deal of doubt in Rome as to what should be done with these Afdui; but at last, as we know, Caesar decided on taking their part; and we know also how he drove Ariovistus back into Germany, with the loss of his wives and daughters. Thus it came to pass, Caesar tells us, that the AEdui were accounted first of all the Gauls in regard to friendship with Rome; while the Remi, who came to his assistance so readily when the Belgians were in arms against him, were allowed the second place. Among the Gauls there are, he says, two classes of men held in honour,—the Druids and the knights ; by which we understand that two professions or modes of life, and two only, were open to the nobility,—the priest¬ hood and the army. All the' common people, Csesar says, are serfs, or little better. They do not hesitate, when oppressed by debt or taxation, or the fear of some powerful enemy, to give themselves into slavery, loving the protection so obtained. The Druids have the chief political authority, and can maintain it by the dreadful power of excommunication. The cxcom- MANNERS OF THE GAULS. 93 municated wretch is an outlaw, beyond the pale of civil rights. Over the Druids is one great Druid, at whose death the place is filled by election among all the Druids, unless there be one so conspicuously first that no ceremony of election is needed. Their most sacred spot for worship is among the Carnutes, in the middle of the country. Their discipline and mys¬ teries came to them from Britain, and when any very knotty point arises they go to Britain to make inquiry. The Druids don’t fight, and pay no taxes. The ambi¬ tion to be a Druid is very great; but then so is the difficulty. Twenty years of tuition is not uncommonly needed ; for everything has to be learned by heart. Of their religious secrets nothing may be written. Their great doctrine is the transmigration of souls ; so that men should believe that the soul never dies, and that death, therefore, or that partial death which we see, need not be feared. They are great also in astronomy, geography, natural history,—and general theology, of course. The knights, or nobles, have no resource but to fight. Caesar suggests that before the blessing of his advent they were driven to the disagreeable necessity of fighting yearly with each other. Of all people the Gauls, he says, are the most given to superstition; in so much so, that in all dangers and difficulties they have recourse'to human sacrifices, in which the Druids are their ministers. They burn their victims to appease their deities, and, by preference, will bum thieves and murderers, — the gods loving best such polluted victims,—but, in default of such, will have 94 THE WAR IN GAUL.—SIXTH BOOK. recourse to an immolation of innocents. Then Csesar tells us that among the gods they chiefly worship Mercury, whom they seem to have regarded as the cleverest of the gods; hut they also worship Apollo, Mars, Jove, and Minerva, ascribing to them the attri¬ butes which are allowed them by other nations. How the worship of the Greek and Eoman gods became mingled with the religion of the Druids we are not told, nor does Caesar express surprise that it should have been so. Caesar gives the Eoman names of these gods, but he does not intend us to understand that they were so called by the Gauls, who had their own names for their deities. The trophies of war they devote to Mars, and in many states keep large stores of such consecrated spoils. It is not often that a Gaul will commit the sacrilege of appropri¬ ating to his own use anything thus made sacred; but the punishment of such offence, when it is com¬ mitted, is death by torture. There is the greatest veneration from sons to their fathers. Until the son can bear arms he does not approach his father, or even stand in public in his presence. The hus¬ band’s fortune is made to equal the wife’s dowry, and then the property is common between them. This seems well enough, and the law would suit the views of British wives of the present day. But the next Gaulish custom is not so well worthy of example. Husbands have the power of life and death over their wives and children ; and when any man of mark dies, if there be cause for suspicion, his wives are examined under torture, and if any evil practice be confessed, they MANNERS OF THE GERMANS. 95 are then tortured to death. We learn from this passage that polygamy was allowed among the Gauls. The Gauls have grand funerals. Things which have been dear to the departed are burned at these ceremonies. Animals were thus burned in Ciesar’s time, but in former days slaves also, and dependants who had been specially loved. The best-governed states are very particular in not allowing rumours as to state affairs to be made matter of public discussion. Anything heard is to be told to the magistrate; but there is to be no discussion on public affairs except in the public coum cil. So much we hear of the customs of the Gauls. The Germans differ from the Gauls in many things. They know nothing of Druids, nor do they care for sacrifices. They worship only what they see and enjoy,—the sun, and fire, and the moon. They spend their time in hunting and war, and care little for agriculture. They live on milk, cheese, and flesh. They are communists as to the soil, and stay no longer than a year on the same land. These customs they follow lest they should learn to prefer agriculture to war; lest they should grow fond of broad posses¬ sions, so that the rich should oppress the poor; lest they should by too much comfort become afraid of cold and heat; lest the love of money should grow among them, and one man should seek to be higher than another.' From all which it seems that the Germans were not without advanced ideas in political economy. It is a great point witn tne Germans to have no near neighbours. For the sake of safety and inde- 96 THE WAR IN GAUL.—SIXTH BOOK. pendence, each tribe loves to have a wide margin. In war the chieftains have power of life and death. In time of peace there are no appointed magistrates, but the chiefs in the cantons declare justice and quell litigation as well as they can. Thieving in a neigh¬ bouring state,—not in his own,—is honourable to a Gc-rman. Expeditions for thieving are formed, which men may join or not as they please ; but woe betide him who, having promised, fails. They are good to travelling strangers. There was a time when the Gauls were better men than the Germans, and could come into Germany and take German land. Even now. says Ctesar, there are Gaulish tribes living in Germany after German fashion. But the nearness of the Province to Gaul has taught the Gauls luxury, and so it has come to pass that the Gauls are not as good in battle as they used to be. It is interesting to gather from all these notices the progress of civilisa¬ tion through the peoples of Europe, and some hint as to what has been thought to be good and bad for humanity by various races before the time of Christ. Cmsar then tells us of a great Hercynian forest, beginning from the north of Switzerland and stretch¬ ing away to the Danube. A man in nine days would traverse its breadth; but even in sixty days a man could not get to the end of it lengthwise. "We may presume that the Black Forest was a portion of it. It contains many singular beasts,—bisons with one horn; elks, which are like great stags, but which have no joints in their legs, and cannot lie down,— nor, if CAESAR PURSUES AMBIORIX. 97 knocked down, can they get up,—which sleep leaning against trees; hut the trees sometimes break, and then the elk falls and has a bad time of it. Then there is the urus, almost as big as an elephant, which spares neither man nor beast. It is a great thing to kill a urus, but no one can tame them, even when young. The Germans are fond of mounting the horns of this animal with silver, and using them for drinking- cups. Caesar does very little over among the Germans. He comes back, partly destroys his bridge, and starts again in search of Ambiorix. His lieutenant Basilus nearly takes the poor hunted chieftain, but Ambiorix escapes, and Caesar moralises about fortune. Ambi- orix, the reader will remember, was joint-king over the Eburones with one Cativolcus. Cativolcus, who is old, finding how his people are harassed, curses his brother king who has brought these sorrows on the nation, and poisons himself with the juice of yew- tree. All the tribes in the Belgic country, Gauls as well as Germans, were now very much harassed. They all had helped, or might have helped, or, if left to them¬ selves, might at some future time give help to Ambi¬ orix and the Eburones. Caesar divides his army, but still goes himself in quest of his victim into the damp, uncomfortable countries near the mouths of the Scheldt and Meuse. Here he is much distracted between his burning desire to extirpate that race of wicked men over whom Ambiorix had been king, and his anxiety lest he should lose more of his own men in the work a. o. vol. iv. G 98 TIIE WAR IN GAUL.—SIXTH BOOK. than the wicked race is worth. He invites the neigh¬ bouring Gauls to help him in the work, so that Gauls should perish in those inhospitable regions rather than his own legionaries. This, however, is fixed in his mind, that a tribe which has been guilty of so terrible an offence,—which has destroyed in war an army of his, just as he would have delighted to destroy a Gaulish army,—must be extirpated, so that its very name may cease to exist! “ Pro tali facinore, stirps ac nomen civitatis tollatur.” Caesar, in dividing his army, had stationed Q. Cicero with one legion and the heavy baggage and spoils of the army, in a fortress exactly at that spot from which Titurius Sabinus had been lured by the craft of Ambiorix. Certain Germans, the Sigambri, having learned that all the property of the Eburones had been given up by Caesar as a prey to any who would take it, had crossed the Rhine that they might thus fill their hands. But.it is suggested to them that they may fill their hands much fuller by attack¬ ing Q. Cicero in his camp; and they do attack him, when the best part of his army is away looking for provisions. That special spot in the territory of the Eburones is again nearly fatal to a Roman legion. But the Germans, not knowing how to press the advantage they gain, return with their spoil across the Rhine, and Caesar again comes up like a god. But he has not as yet destroyed Ambiorix,—who indeed is not taken at last,—and expresses his great disgust and amazement that the coming of these Germans, which was planned with the view of injuring Ambiorix, AMBIORIX ESCAPES. 90 should have done instead so great a service to that monstrously wicked chieftain. He does his very best to catch Ambiorix in person, offering great rewards and inducing his men to undergo all manner of hardships in the pursuit. Ambiorix, however, with three or four chosen followers, escapes him. But Csesar is not without revenge. He burns all the villages of the Eburones, and all their houses. He so lays waste the country that even when his army is gone not a soul should be able to live there. After that he probably allowed himself to be shaved. Am¬ biorix is seen here and is seen there, but with hair¬ breadth chances eludes his pursuer. Csesar, having thus failed, returns south, as winter approaches, to Rheims,—Durocortorum; and just telling us in four words how he had one Acco tortured to death because Acco had headed a conspiracy in the middle of Gaul among the Carnutes and Sen ones, and how he out¬ lawed and banished others whom he could not catch, he puts his legions into winter quarters, and again goes back to Italy to hold assizes and look after Ids interests amid the great affairs of the Republic. CHAPTER VIII. 8EVENTH BOOK OF THE WAR IN GAUL. —THE REVOLT OF VERCINGETORIX.—B.C. 52 . In opening his account of his seventh campaign Caesar makes almost the only reference to the affairs of Rome which we find in these memoirs. Clodius has been murdered. We know, too, that Crassus had been killed at the head of his army in the east, and that, at the death of Clodius, Pompey had been created Dictator in the city with the name of sole Consul. Caesar, however, only mentions the murder of Clodius, and then goes on to say that the Gauls, knowing how important to him must he the affairs of Rome at this moment, think that he cannot now attend to them, and that, in his absence, they may shake off the Roman yoke. The affairs of Rome must indeed have been important to Caesar, if, as no doubt is true, he had already before liis eyes a settled course of action by which to make himself su¬ preme in the Republic. Clodius, the demagogue, was dead, whom he never could have loved, but whom it had not suited him to treat as an enemy. Crassus, too, was dead, whom, on account of his wealth, Caesar had admitted as a colleague. Pompey, the third triumvir, THE REVOLT OF VERCINGETORIX. 101 remained at Rome, and was now sole Consul; Pom. pey who, only twelve months since, had so fondly given up his legion for the sake of the Republic,—and for friendship. Caesar, no doubt, foresaw by this time that the struggle must be at last between himself and Pompey. The very forms of the old republican rule were being turned adrift, and Caesar must have known, as Pompey also knew, and Clodius had known, and even Crassus, that a new power would become para¬ mount in the city. But the hands to wrest such power must be very strong. And the day had not yet quite come. Having spent six summers in subduing Gaul, Caesar would not lose the prestige, the power, the sup- port, which such a territory, really subdued, would give him. Things, doubtless, were important at Rome, but it was still his most politic course to return over the Alps and complete his work. Before the winter was over he heard that the tribes were conspiring, because it was thought that at such an emergency Caesar could not leave Italy. This last book of the Commentary, as written by Caesar, tells the story of the gallant Vercingetorix, one of the Arverni,—the modern Auvergne,—whose father, Celtillus, is said to have sought the chieftainship of all Gaul, and to have been killed on that account by his own state. Vercingetorix is certainly the hero of these wars on the Gaulish side, though we hear nothing of him till this seventh campaign. The conspiracy against Rome is afloat, the Carnutes. whose chief town is Gena- bum,—Orleans,—having commenced it. Vercingetorix excites his own countrymen to join, but is expelled from 102 THE WAR IN GAUL.—SEVENTH BOOK. their town, Gergovia, for the attempt. The Arverni, oi at least their chief men, fear to oppose the Romans; hut Vercingetorix obtains a crowd of followers out in the country, and perseveres. Men of other tribes come to him, from as far north as Paris, and west from the Ocean. He assumes supreme power, and enacts and carries out most severe laws for his guidance during the war. Por any greater offence he burns the offender alive and subjects him to all kinds of torments. Por any small fault he cuts off a man’s ears, pokes out one of his eyes, and sends him home, that he may be an example visible to all men. By threats of such pun¬ ishment to those who do not join him, and by inflict¬ ing such on those who do and are then untrue to him or lukewarm, he gets together a great army. Caesar, who is still in Italy, hears of all this, and having made things comfortable with Pompey, hurries into the pro¬ vince. He tells us of his great difficulty in joining his arm}' - ,—of the necessity which is incumbent on him of securing even the Roman Province from invasion, and of the manner in which he breaks through snow- clad mountains, the Cevennes, at a time of the year in which such mountains were supposed to be impassable. He is forced into fighting before the winter is over, be¬ cause, unless he does so, the few friends he has in Gaul, —the iEdui, for instance,—will have been gained over by the enemy. This made it very difficult, Caesar tells us, for him to know what to do; but he decides that he must begin his campaign, though it be winter still. Caesar, moving his army about with wonderful quick¬ ness, takes three towns in the centre of Gaul, of which THE FATE OF AVARICUM. 103 Genabum, Orleans, is tlie first, and thus provides him¬ self with food. Vercingetorix, when he hears of these losses, greatly troubled in his mind that Caesar should thus be enabled to exist on the provisions gathered by the Gauls, determines to burn all the Gaulish towns in those parts. He tells his people that there is nothing else for them in their present emergency, and that they must remember when they see their hearths smoking and their property destroyed, that it would be, or ought to be, much more grievous for them to know that their wives and children would become slaves, as undoubt¬ edly would be their fate, if Caesar were allowed to pre¬ vail. The order is given. Twenty cities belonging to one tribe are burned to the ground. The same thing is done in other states. But there is one very beauti¬ ful city, the glory of the country round, which can, they say, b6 so easily defended that it will be a comfort rather than a peril to them. Avaricum, the present Bourges,—must that also be burned ? May not Ava¬ ricum be spared? Vercingetorix is all for burning Avaricum as he has burned the others ; but he allows himself to be persuaded, and the city is spared—for the time. Caesar, of course, determines to case Avaricum ; but he encounters great difficulties. The cattle have been driven away. There is no corn. Those wretched /Edui do almost nothing for him; and the Boii, who are their neighbours, and who, at the best, are but a poor scanty people, are equally unserviceable. Some days his army is absolutely without food; but yet no word of complaint is heard “ unworthy of the majesty 104 THE WAR IN GAUL.—SEVENTH BOOR. and former victories of tlie Boman people.” The sol¬ diers even beg him to continue the siege when he offers to raise it because of the hardships they are enduring. Let them endure anything, they say, but failure! “ Moreover Caesar, when he would accost his legions one by one at their work, and would tell them that he would raise the siege if they could but ill bear their privations, was implored by all of them not to do that. They said that for many years under his command they had so well done their duty that they had undergone no disgrace, had never quitted their ground leaving aught unfinished,”—except the subjugation of Britain they might perhaps have said,—“ that they would be now disgraced if they should raise a siege which had been commenced; that they would rather bear all hardships than not avenge the Boman citizens who had perished at Genabum by the perfidy of the Gauls.” Caesar puts these words into the mouths of his legionaries, and as we read them we believe that such was the existing spirit of the men. Caesar’s soldiers now had learned better than to cry because they were afraid of their enemies. Then we hear that Vercingetorix is in trouble with the Gauls. The Gauls, when they see the Bomans so near them, think that they are to be betrayed into Caesar’s hands, and they accuse their .leader. But Vercingetorix makes them a speech, and brings up cer* tain Boman prisoners to give evidence as to the evil condition of the Boman army. Vercingetorix swears that these prisoners are soldiers from the Boman legions, and so settles that little trouble; but Caesar. THE FATE OF AVARICUM. 105 defending liis legionaries, asserts that the merf so used were simply slaves. Vercingetorix is in his camp at some little distance from Avarieum, while Caesar is determined to take the city. We have the description of the siege, concise, graphic, and clear. We are told of the nature of the walls; how the Gauls were good at mining and countermining; how they Hung hot pitch and boiling grease on the invaders ; how this was kept up, one Gaul after another stepping on to the body of his dying comrade; how at last they resolved to quit the town and make their way by night to the camp of Vercingetorix, but were stopped by the prayers of their own women, who feared Caesar’s mercies ;—and how at last the city was taken. We cannot but execrate Caesar when he tells us coolly of the result. They were all killed. The old, the women, and the chil¬ dren, perished altogether, slaughtered by the Bomans. Out of forty thousand inhabitants, Caesar says that about eight hundred got safely to Vercingetorix. Of course we doubt the accuracy of Caesar’s figures when he tells us of the numbers of the Gauls ; but we do not doubt that but a few escaped, and that all but a few were slaughtered. When, during the last campaign, the Gauls at Genabum (Orleans) had determined on revolt against Caesar, certain Boman traders—usurers for the most part, who had there established them¬ selves—were killed. Caesar gives this as the cause, and sufficient cause, for the wholesale slaughter of women and children ! One reflects that not otherwise, per- haps, could he have conquered Gaul, and that Gaul 10G THE WAR IN GAEL.—SEVENTH BOOK. had to be conquered; but we cannot for tbe moment but abhor the man capable of such work. Yercinget- orix bears his loss bravely. He reminds the Gauls that had they taken his advice the city would have been destroyed by themselves and not defended ; ho tells them that all the states of Gaul are now ready to join him; and he prepares to fortify a camp after the Roman fashion. Hitherto the Gauls have fought either from behind the walls of towns, or out in the open country without other protection than that of the woods and hills. Then there is another episode with those unsatisfac¬ tory iEdui. There is a quarrel among them who shall be their chief magistrate,—a certain old man or a cer¬ tain young man,—and they send to Caesar to settle the question. Caesar’s hands are very full; but, as he explains, it is essential to him that his allies shall be kept in due subordinate order. He therefore absolutely goes in person to one of their cities, and decides that the young man shall be the chief magistrate. But, as he seldom does anything for nothing, he begs that ten thousand HMuan infantry and all the iEduan cav¬ alry may be sent to help him against Yercingetorix. The Hklui have no alternative but to comply. Their compliance, however, is not altogether of a friendly nature. The old man who has been put out of the magistracy gets hold of the iEduan general of the forces ; and the Hkluan army takes the field,—to help, not Caesar, but Yercingetorix ! There is a large amount of . lying and treachery among the H£dui, and of course tidings of what is going on are carried to Caesar. Over THE SIEGE OF GERGOVIA. 107 and over again these people deceive him, betray him, and endeavour to injure his cause; hut he always for¬ gives them, or pretends to forgive them. It is his policy to show to the Gauls how great can he the friendship and clemency of Ctesar. If he would have burned the ^dui and spared Bourges we should have liked him better; but then, had he done so, he would not have been Cassar. While Caesar is thus troubled with his allies, he has trouble enough also with his enemies. Yercingetorix, with his followers, after that terrible reverse at Avari- cum,—Bourges,—goes into his own country which we know as Auvergne, and there encamps his army on a high hill with a flat top, called Gergovia. All of us who have visited Clermont have probably seen the hill. Yercingetorix makes three camps for his army on the hill, and the Arverni have a town there. The Gaul has so placed himself that there shall be a river not capable of being forded between himself and Caesar. But the Homan general makes a bridge and sets him¬ self down with his legions before Gergovia. The limits of this little work do not admit of any detailed descrip¬ tion of Caesar’s battles ; but perhaps there is none more interesting than this siege. The three Gaidish camps are taken. The women of Gergovia, thinking that their town is taken also, leaning over the walls, implore mercy from the Homans, and beg that they may not be treated as have the women of Avaricum. Certain leading Homan soldiers absolutely climb up into the town. The reader also thinks that Caesar is to prevail,