DUBLIN. AN HISTORICAL SKETCH IRELAND'S METROPOLIS. EDITED BY THOMAS 0. SUMMERS, D.D, NasljbilLe, fRtnn. : SOUTHERN METHODIST PUBLISHING HOUSE. 1860. STEREOTYPED AND PRINTED BY A. A. STITT, SOUTHBEK METHODIST PUBLISHING HOUSB, NASHVILLE, TENN. xtixtt* It is proposed to give in this small volume, some account of a city which rules and graces one of the finest bays of the ocean — the me- tropolis of a country fraught with industrial resources beyond what most others possess, and peopled by a race proverbial for intelli- gence and hospitality, and certainly not in- ferior to their neighbors in many qualities necessary to form a prosperous and influen- tial community. 2959 ; 3ST0N COLLEGE LIBRARY HESTNUT HILL, MA, 02167 s/ C n t * tt i s Page PREFACE V SECTION I. DUBLIN PREVIOUS TO THE ELEVENTH CENTURY 7 SECTION IL DUBLIN SUBJECT TO THE ENGLISH PAPAL RULE.... 29 SECTION IIL " DUBLIN DURING THE BRITISH REFORMATION 60 SECTION IV. DUBLIN UNDER JAMES I. AND CHARLES 1 89 SECTION V. DUBLIN AT THE COMMONWEALTH, THE RESTORA- TION, AND THE REVOLUTION Ill SECTION VI. DUBLIN IN THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY 135 SECTION VII. DUBLIN SINCE THE UNION WITH GREAT BRITAIN TO THE YEAR EIGHTEEN HUNDRED AND FIFTY 168 DUBLIN. SECTION I. DUBLIN PREVIOUS TO THE ELEVENTH CENTURY. The earliest authentic notice of Dublin occurs in the geography of Ptolemy, who flourished in the second century of our era. His description of the world as then known begins with Hibernia, an honor which the country received from him because of its being the most western in Europe. His map of Ireland is much more correct in its outline than the one he has furnished of Great Britain : in the latter, the portion now called Scotland is made to bend off eastward, nearly at a right angle from the southern portion. He marks "Eblana" just where Dublin at present stands, and he describes it as " ttoXic" a city. The people inhabiting the range northward as far as the river Boyne, including part of Meath, he calls "Eblani," probably as belonging or subject to "Eblana," though some conjecture that the place took its name from the people, not the people theirs from the place. That the words "Dublin" and "Eblana" were (7) 8 DUBLIN PREVIOUS TO at first one, is obvious. Indeed, it has been more than supposed that a letter has been lost from the original, and that Ptolemy wrote "Z>eblana." "Dublin" is composed of .two Irish words, — "Dubh," black, and "Linn," -water — the river which here empties itself into the sea being of a dark color, from its fit wing over a bog. The city was otherwise called " Ath-Cliath," the "Hurdle-Ford," and " Bally Ath-Cliath," the "Town of the Hurdle-Ford." Both names in- dicate that a passage was here made or marked by "hurdles" across the stream. Tradition re- ports that it was constructed for more safely con- veying sheep from one side to the other; but whether it had at all the form of a " suspension- bridge" the account does not explain. A fourth name given to the city in olden time, was " Drooni-Choll-Coil," the " Brow of a Hazel- Wood," from its occupying the upper front of a rise of ground, other parts of which were covered with a wood of the kind mentioned. Dublin must have been in Ptolemy's day, by report at least, a place of some size and import- ance, or he would not have styled it a "city." We should, however, greatly mistake if we con- ceived it to have been then an aggregation of houses, streets, and public buildings, such as the word suggests to us now. " The ancient Irish were at no trouble in providing for themselves habitations of solid and lasting materials. Their houses were built of twigs and hurdles, and covered with sedge or straw." Buildings of stone and mortar are believed to have been un- THE ELEVENTH CENTURY. 9 known in Ireland before the sixth century. For the introduction of what we call "architecture," the country is indebted to Christianity. The population of "Eblana" were unacquainted with our often costly and trouble-causing superfluities of boarded floors, glazed windows, paved ways, gas-lights, scavengering, sewerage, and police — ■ matters which we moderns are apt to reckon among the necessaries of life. Let the reader, for a moment, in his conception sweep away the present " Dublin ;" then group, without much re- gard to order, a few hundred " cabins," some of them larger than the rest, along the upper part of the range fronting the Liifey, from Cork Hill to Bridge street ; next, clothe the top and south- ern descent of the ridge with a hazel-wood, which he may also carry round the eastern and western sides of the "city," and along between it and the river; finally, let him place a " hurdle-ford" where Whitworth Bridge now stands ; and he will perhaps have as correct an idea of Ptolemy's " Eblana" as a model by Brunetti could supply. Three orders of royalty then existed in Ireland. The country had its unity, its divisions, and its subdivisions of sovereignty. It was parcelled out under a large number of toparchs, or petty chiefs, each of whom bore the title of {' king," as was the case in the early times of Palestine and its neigh- bor lands. Above these were five provincial monarchs, "kings" of a higher grade. One of the five reigned over all, as "king of Ireland:" his palace was on the hill of Tarah, in Meath, where he triennially convened the states of his 10 DUBLIN PREVIOUS TO realm, for enacting laws and other national busi- ness, and where he entertained his dignitaries with hospitality and magnificence worthy of his supremacy. "Eblana" had its "king," one of the lowest order of royal personages. The food of the common people of ancient Ire- land is said to have been "very mean and slen- der — namely, milk, butter, and herbs: from whence," writes Ware, "the Epitome of Strabo calls the Irish herb-eaters." The gentry and nobility lived in higher style. Had we entered a banqueting-hall of the Eblani on a great festi- val day, we might have found the company re- clining on couches of grass or rushes, round a table furnished with griddle-baked bread, milk- meats, and varieties of fish and flesh, both boiled and roast. The cup, too, made of wood, or horn, or brass, filled with beer or mead — "whisky" was then unknown — was passed joyfully from guest to guest, while the metal-strung harp, obe- dient to the touch of skill and taste, sent forth stirring sounds, with which oft mingled those of the martial drum, accompanying the bard's recital of warm affection, of illustrious ancestry, and of heroic deeds. Of trade and commerce Eblana had not much to boast: none of its people ranked as "merchant princes." Its Liffey was not crowded with ship- ping which brought in the produce of other lands, or bore away the growth and manufacture of its own. The risk incurred in crossing the bar from the sea, except at certain times of the tide, to- gether with the scanty demands for articles of THE ELEVENTH CENTURY. 11 which there was not a home supply, made the arrival of a foreign vessel an " event" as great as was the visit of a European or American ship at Hawaii or Tahiti fifty years ago. The Eblani had pasturage for cattle and sheep. They were also engaged in agriculture, though of a some- what humble order — the"~Irish plough being, cen- turies later, a small wooden instrument tied to the tail of an ox or a "hobby." Fishing was common. Their boats were of tw6 kinds : one, a canoe formed out of the trunk of a tree, and called a " Cotti," of which a specimen is to be seen in the Royal Dublin Society's Museum. The other, called a " Corragh," consisted of a frame of wicker-work covered with hides, larger, longer, and otherwise more adapted for sea-work, but in materials and structure like the "corracles" still used on rivers in Wales and adjoining parts. It was in a " corragh" that Columba with his twelve companions went from Ireland to Iona, in the sixth century. Learning and refinement among the Eblani can be judged of only from what is known of the Irish in general of those times, and even that informa- tion is scanty and precarious. The Ogham in- scriptions are of a very high antiquity. We are told of schools at Tarah, where youths were trained for sacred and civic duties. The Irish warriors were " sworn to be the protectors of the fair, and avengers of their wrongs; and to be polite in word and address to their greatest enemies." " A character without guile or deceit was esteemed the highest that could be given among the ancient 12 DUBLIN PREVIOUS TG Irish, and the favorite panegyric of a bard to his hero would be that he had a heart incapable of guile. " The Irish were early acquainted with the game of chess. Their harp and song, too, have attained a world-wide fame. The former is be- lieved to have been kept " sacredly unaltered" from the ages we are speaking of down to com- paratively modern date, when Drayton wrote : — " The Irish I admire, And still cleare to that lyre As our muse's mother, And think, till I expire, Apollo's such another." Bacon pronounced, "No harp hath the sound so melting and prolonged as the Irish harp ;" and Evelyn wrote : " Such music before or since did I never hear — that instrument being neglected for its extraordinary difficulty; but in my judg- ment being far superior to the lute itself, or what- ever speaks with strings/' Ancient Erin was the home of poetic genius. Feargus, called " Fion- bell, or the Sweet-voiced," was one of its most distinguished bards. An ode of his composition, delivered extempore, is said to have succeeded in blending in peace and friendship two chiefs, "Gaul the Son of Morni," and "Finn of the flowing locks," who, with their respective follow- ers, had met on a field of strife to contend for spoils they had jointly won from a common foe. The following lines, from a translation of his "War Ode" to Osgar, the son of Ossian, at the battle of Graura, when leading on his troops against Cairbre, the monardh. of Ireland, towards the close THE ELEVENTH CENTURY. 13 of the third century, present a thought truly sublime : — " Thine be the battle, thine the sway ! On, on to Cairbre hew thy conquering way, And let thy deathful arm dash safety from his side ! As the proud wave, on whose broad back The storm its burden heaves, Drives on the scattered wreck Its ruin leaves ; So let thy sweeping progress roll, Fierce, resistless, rapid, strong — - Pour, like the billow of the flood, o'erwhelming might along." The Cromlechs in the neighborhood of Dublin — one near the Hill of Howth, another on the south of Killiney Hill, and another at Cabin- teely, about a mile westward — show that Druidism was the religion of the Eblani, as it was of other parts of the country. In due form and solemnity their priests ministered at the altar within the circle of stones, presenting, on behalf of the con- gregation outside the sacred enclosure, sacrifices and other homages to their Baalim, the sun, the moon, and the host of heaven. Holocausts of human beings were among the rites prescribed by that superstition. Fire was an object of wor- ship, perhaps by tradition from the Shechina-h. Mountains and trees, also, are said to have had divine honors paid to them. Groves of the oak were not wanting to aid devotion, and afford growth to the mistletoe. Then, as now, the faith of the people hung pieces of cloth on branches near a " holy well/' to imbibe- from the presence 14 DUBLIN PREVIOUS TO there a virtue which might be carried away and applied for the removal of disease, or /or some other useful purpose. Moreover, the invisible, but, when angered, desolating Wind, was held in awe and propitiated, lest, neglected, it should break forth in fury and spread havoc around. It was a prevailing opinion that the Round Towers, of which there is one at Clondalkin, about three miles west of Dublin, and another at Swords, six miles north of the city, were Fire-temples. But Dr. Petrie seems to have exhausted the argument, upon the subject, and concludes that they are buildings connected with Christianity. It is certain that the gospel had found its way into Ireland previously to the fifth century, in the early part of which, as Prosper' s Chronicle re- cords, Palladius was sent by Celestine, bishop of Rome, "to the Scots believing in Christ/' Ire- land being then called ." Scotia," and its inha- bitants " Scoti," or Scots. How, when, or by whom the Christian faith first came into the country, we know not, but the honor of converting the Irish nation is commonly ascribed to St. Patrick, who came to evangelize them, shortly after the mission and death of Palladius. Sir William Betham, however, than whom few anti- quaries have given more attention to the question, thinks that the true Patrick, whose labors so emi- nently contributed to Christianize the people, lived and* did his work long before Palladius ex- isted. Without entering upon that inquiry, we may notice the account which a tradition gives of the gospel being brought to Dublin. It is, that THE ELEVENTH CENTURY. 15 Patrick, having preached with great success in Ulster and Con naught, came into Meath and Leinster, and took Dublin on his way southward : that having crossed the Finglass river to the rising ground within a mile of the city, perhaps near the site of Phibbsborough, he pronounced upon it a prophetic benediction, affirming that the city "should increase in riches and dignities, until at length it should be lifted up unto the throne of the kingdom :" that when he reached Dublin he preached to the king, Alphin Mac Eochaid, and his subjects, who received the divine message, and were baptized at a well, south of the city; and that the saint founded a church near this well, where now stands St. Patrick's cathedral. This is said to have oc- curred in the year -148. The detail is not vouched for by high authority, but it is the only one that tradition has preserved. We have good evidence that the religion taught by Patrick, properly so called, was not that decreed by the Council of Trent, professed in the creed of Pope Pius IV., and disseminated by the propagandas of Rome and Lyons. In other words, it much more resembled New Tes- tament Christianity than modern Homanism. Patrick found a number of churches and bishops in Ireland. He himself formed three hundred and sixty-five churches, and ordained over them an equal number of bishops, and three thousand presbyters ; but he subjected none of them to the Roman see. The worship of the Virgin, transubstantiation, the adoration of images, re- 16 DUBLIN PREVIOUS TO stricting the reading of the Sacred Scriptures, and many other things now insisted upon as parts of the gospel, were not then recognized even "by the Church at Rome. In the transactions of the Royal Irish Academy is published a translation, by Dr. Petrie, of a hymn composed by St. Patrick when he was about to visit Temur, or Tarah, and preach the gospel to Leogaire, the monarch of all Ireland. The visit was critical to Patrick himself, and to the cause he was embarked in. The adherents of the old paganism were prepared to withstand, as best they could, the assault he was about to make upon it in its highest places. Though it be not connected with Dublin in par- ticular, yet, as throwing light on the doctrine which Patrick taught there, this " Hymn" will be interesting to the reader, and he shall have the translation of it before him entire : "At Temur/' [that is, Tarah, the court of the king,] " to-day I invoke the mighty power of the Trinity. I believe in the Trinity under the God of the elements. "At Temur to-day (I place) the virtue of the birth of Christ with his baptism, the virtue of his crucifixion with his burial, the virtue, of his resurrection with his ascension, the virtue of his coming to the eternal judgment. "At Temur to-day (I place) the virtue of the love of Seraphim, (the virtue which exists) in the obedience of angels, in the hope of the resur- rection to eternal reward, in the prayers of the noble fathers, in the predictions of the prophets, in the preaching of the apostles, in the faith of THE ELEVENTH CENTURY. 17 the confession, in the purity of the holy virgins, in the deeds of just men. "At Temur to-day (I place) the strength of heaven, the light of the sun, the rapidity of lightning, the swiftness of the wind, the depth of the sea, the stability of the earth, the hardness of rocks (between me and the powers of paganism and demons.) "At Temur to-day may the strength of God pilot me, may the power of God preserve me, may the wisdom of God instruct me, may the eye of God view me, may the ear of God hear me, may the word of God render me eloquent, may the hand of God protect me, may the .mercy of God direct me, may the shield of God defend me, may the host of God guard me, against the snares" of demons, the temptations of vices, the inclina- tions of the mind, against every man who medi- tates evil to me, far or near, alone or in company. "I place all these powers between me and every evil unmerciful power directed against my body, (as a protection) against the incantations of false prophets ; against the black laws of gentil- ism ; against the false laws of heresy; against the treachery of idolatry ; against the spells of women, snaiths, and Druids; against every know- ledge which binds the soul of man. May Christ to-day protect me against poison, against burn- ing, against drowning, against wounding, until I deserve much reward. " Christ be with me, Christ before me, Christ after me, Christ in me, Christ under me, Christ over me, Christ at my right, Christ at my left, 18 DUBLIN PREVIOUS TO Christ at this side, Christ at that side ; Christ at raj back. " Christ be in the heart of each person whom I speak to j Christ in the mouth of each person who speaks to me ; Christ in each eye that sees me ', Christ in each ear which hears me. "At Temur to-day I invoke the almighty power of the Trinity. I believe in the Trinity under the unity of the Grod of the elements. " Salvation is the Lord's, salvation is the Lord's, salvation is Christ's. May thy salvation, Lord, be always with me." The above document, of the genuineness of which no^ doubt appears to exist, may not pre- sent the trust of Christian piety in the clear and strong light of New Testament instruction. It corresponds rather with the mysticism which had begun to creep over the Church about the time of Jerome. But it shows ji heart that looked for help to Christ alone as God our Saviour. It gives no token of the " ever Blessed and Immaculate Virgin," the "never-failing Star of Hope," the " Help of Christians," the " Most Holy Mother," being " constantly and fervently invoked," " as the general patroness of all Ireland," as the synod at Thurles, in the year 1850, prescribed she should be ; although, if at any time that zealous and devout man, St. Patrick, had judged it right and useful to seek her aid, he surely would have implored it under the circumstances which led him to compose the "Hymn" given above. The notices which we have of Dublin previous THE ELEVENTH CENTURY. 19 to the arrival of the Danes, an event which is believed to have occurred towards the close of the fifth century, are extremely meagre and un- certain. Almost the only item of information beyond what has been stated, is that about the beginning of the third century a division was made of the country into two portions, by a line running direct across it from Dublin on the east coast to G-alway on the west. The northern por- tion or kingdom was called Leath Quinn, or the Half of Quinn or Conn, and the southern was called Leath Mogha, or the Half of Eoghan, or Mogha, king of Munster. The termination of the separation line eastward is said to have been where High street now stands. The Danes were usually called " Ostmen," or men from the east, in Ireland, as in England and France they were called " Northmen," or Nor- mans, men from the north — the name being given in each case according to the relative position of the country whence they came. It is not unlikely that their first landing at Dublin was for trade rather than for war or plunder. The place of their settlement was styled " Ostmantown," now changed into " Oxmantown," a district on the north side of the Liffey, at present partly occu- pied by the Royal Barracks, and perhaps nearly answering to Arran Quay "Ward in the municipal divisions of the city. Some respectable authori- ties maintain that the Danes were unknown in Ireland till near the middle of the ninth century. Dr. Lanigan, in his Ecclesiastical History of Ireland, not only rejects the story of the inhabit- 20 DUBLIN PREVIOUS TO ants of Dublin and their king having been con- verted by the preaching of St. Patrick, but states that the city had no bishop till the eleventh cen- tury. In the latter particular he is in error, un- less by a " bishop" he intends a prelate of the Romish Church. The name of seven persons who were bishops of Dublin during the seventh and eighth centuries are given by Ware. There were also monastic establishments formed at Kilmain- ham, Clonclalkin, Tallaght, and a few other places in the vicinity. In those times, Ireland was eminent for her schools of learning, and for the piety and zeal of her monks. About the year 564, St. Columba and twelve companions left the country and settled in Iona.* Other monks from Ireland located themselves and labored with much zeal in the north of England. Many others, again, passed over to the continent, and devoted them- selves to Christianize and civilize its then barbar- ous population, until the power of Rome's bishop obliged them to conform or flee. What propor- tion, or whether any, of these earnest men went from Dublin or its neighborhood is unknown. The venerable Bede records that, in the seventh century, numbers of the nobility and others of England went over to Ireland, on ac- count of the advantages it afforded above their own country for education and religious improve- ment. Among the persons of high rank who thus made it a temporary residence, was Alfrid, a * For information on this point, the reader is referred to Dr. Alexander's volume on Iona, in our catalogue. THE ELEVENTH CENTURY. 21 son of Oswin, the king of Northumberland. Os- win, urged by the agents of Rome to recognize her rule, held an assembly for discussing in his presence the difference pf opinion between them and the Irish monks — who till then had minister- ed to his people — respecting the observance of Easter. The design of the conference was to supply argument which would enable the king to form a sound judgment for his own guidance. In the end, Oswin, to make himself sure of the favor of Peter, who was represented as holding the keys of heaven, gave his verdict in favor of the Roman clergy, and the Irish monks were obliged forth- with to leave Northumbria and return to their native land. On the death of Oswin, his son Egfrid succeeded him in the throne, and Alfrid, his other son, withdre% to Ireland, dreading his brother's jealousy. In June, 684, Egfrid sent an expedition, under a commander named Beret, against the district caljed Bergia, lying between Dublin and Drogheda. The marauders spared neither laity nor clergy, things sacred nor things secular, and bore away with them " many cap- tives and much booty." It is possible that the favorable treatment given to Alfrid may have provoked this outrage. Alfrid is said to have become, while in Ireland, " a man most learned in the Scriptures/' and " highly qualified for be- ing placed at the head of a state/' which position he acquired when his brother died. A~ poem, composed by Alfrid, is yet extant in the Irish language, describing, in a lively strain, what he had observed in travelling through various parts 22 DUBLIN PREVIOUS TO of the country. It is too long to be inserted en- tire, but three stanzas may be transcribed as given in a translation : "I found the good lay monks and brothers Ever beseeching help for others, And, in their keeping, the holy word Pure as it came from Jesus the Lord. " I found in Leinster the smooth and sjeek, From Dublin to Slewniargy's peak, Flourishing pastures, valor, health, Long-living worthies, commerce, wealth. "I found in Meath's fair principality, Virtue, vigor, and hospitality, Candor, joyfulness, bravery, purity — Ireland's bulwark and security." With regard to what is* said of the Irish monks " ever beseeching help for others/' the reader will observe that it was for others, not for them- selves, that they sought assistance ; and it ought to be borne in mind that the Irish monks had it as a law that they were not to live upon alms, but were to support themselves by their own in- dustry. The mention of " commerce" in Lein- ster naturally refers to Dublin, that city being, it is presumed, the principal, if not then the only seaport in the province. Slewmargy is a moun- tain in the Queen's County. In the third of the above stanzas, there are allusions to Tarah, where the monarch of all Ireland held his court. Supposing the Danes to have settled in or near Dublin, as before noticed, towards the close of the fifth century, they must have lived on good , THE ELEVENTH CENTURY. 23 terms with its native inhabitants, for we have no accounts of disagreements between the two parties till about the year 838. By that time, however, they appear to have become masters of the place, and their power had so'increased that it aroused the fears of the local Irish chiefs around. In 851, the kings of Leinster and Meath made war upon them, expelled them from the city, and gave it up to pillage by a rude soldiery. But, in the year following, the Danes returned in great power, regained the place, fortified it with a wall and towers, and crowned their leader, Amlaffe, " king" of Dublin. He built himself a royal re- sidence at Clondalkin. Hostilities frequently occurred between him and the neighboring princes; On one occasion they attacked Clondalkin, burned his palace there, and slew a hundred of his servants. He retaliated, by surprising a body of their followers, two thousand in number, all of whom he either killed or made prisoners. He made excursions into the country, and, among other successful enterprises, he plundered and burned Armagh. In 870, he and his son Yvar crossed the channel with an army to assist their brethren, the Danes, against the Saxons in Eng- land. The Ulster Annals relate their return thus : "Amlaffe and Yvar came to Ath-Cliath, out of Albany, with two hundred ships, and brought with them a great prey of English, Bri- tons, and Picts." In 872, Ostin Mac Amlaffe, king of Dublin, invaded the Picts of North Britain with success, but was afterwards slain by his own people. On the other hand, in 890, 24 DUBLIN PREVIOUS TO Dublin was taken by Gregory, king of Scotland. Two years afterwards, a great fleet of Danes ar- rived in the Liffey, to assist tbeir countrymen, but on disembarking they were routed near the city with great slaughter. In 916, the Danes sustained the greatest defeat they ever had ex- perienced in the country ; yet, strange to record, in that same year they ravaged the island of An- glesea; and in three years more they vanquished and slew Neill IV., king of Ireland, in a battle near their city. The long recital of constantly occurring fights, maraudings, and bloodshed, at which the preced- ing paragraph merely affords a glance, is inter- rupted by a statement that, about the year 948, the Danes of Dublin renounced heathenism and embraced Christianity. As will appear in our next section, it was Christianity as then Roman- ized, not Christianity as it existed among the native Irish, that they received. This circum- stance will account for the outrages the Danes of Dublin continued to practice on their Irish neigh- bors, so strongly complained of by Dr. Lanigan, the ecclesiastical historian of Ireland : " These new converts/' he writes, " did not imbibe the meekness prescribed by the gospel ; for in 950," only two years after their conversion, " the Danes of Dublin plundered and burned Slane ; so that many persons assembled in the belfry perished in the flames." About the time they became nomi- nally Christians, they founded the Abbey of St. Mary, near Ostmantown, their own settlement. As the best sites were chosen for such establish- THE ELEVENTH CENTURY. 25 ments, we may presume that the portion of the city now traversed by Capel street, and its branches right and left, was then a spot the most eligible, for its rich soil, lovely position, and other conveniences, that the Danes had at their com- mand in the neighborhood of Dublin. Rapin informs us that Edgar, surnamed the Peaceable, king of England, kept a fleet of four thousand vessels, by which he not only protected his own dominions, but " obliged the kings of Wales, Ireland, and the Isle of Man, to swear allegiance to him, and acknowledge him for sove- reign." This account of the extent of Edgar's rule corresponds with statements in a charter granted by him at Gloucester, 964. In that document he claims to have subdued under his power, " by the propitious grace of God," " to- gether with the empire of the English, all the •kingdoms of the islands of the ocean, with their fierce kings, as far as Norway, and the greatest part of Ireland, with its most noble city, Dublin." It is probable that the " king of Ireland," men- tioned in Raping is the Danish king of Dublin, who was also sovereign of all the Danes in other parts of the country, including Limerick and Waterford. How long the king of Dublin re- mained subject to the king of England is not reported j but coins exist, which were struck at "Dyfelin," or Dublin, bearing the name of Ethel- red, who was next but one in succession to Edgar on the English throne. Consequently there was a "mint" in the city, in the latter half of the tenth century. 26 DUBLIN PREVIOUS TO The year 980 saw the Danes of Dublin routed by Malachi, king of Ireland, in an engagement at Tarah; and nine years afterwards, the same Malachi assailed them in their own quarters in Dublin, slew great numbers of them, remained there three-score nights, and pressed them so close in their camp on the shore outside the city, that they had no drink but the salt water. At length they submitted, and agreed to pay an ounce of gold out of every messuage and garden in Dublin, to him and his successors, yearly at Christmas. While these matters were transpiring, another person was rising in power, who made his name one of the most famed in ancient Irish history. This was Brien Boroomh, king of Munster, who ere long became king of the whole country. In the year 999, the Dublin Danes ravaged a great part of Leinster, and brought back, among other prisoners, the king of the province, who was one of Brien' s liegeman. Brien, on hearing this, marched with a select body of troops to Dublin, delivered the king of Leinster, banished the Dan- ish king Sitricus beyond the seas, burned a great part of the city, and brought away a considerable quantity of gold and silver, with manufactured goods and other valuable effects. The citizens gave hostages, and were allowed to repair their works. Brien continued to pursue his conquests and depredations in other parts of Ireland. In 1013, however, the king of Leinster and the Danes of Dublin joined in a league against him. He laid the province waste to the very walls of THE ELEVENTH CENTURY. 27 the city, and, early in the following year, engaged many of the Irish princes to unite with him in a grand effort either to destroy the Danes, or com- pel them to quit the country altogether. Their monarch, Sitricus, with the Leinster king, were not slow in -snaking preparations to defeat him. Aids came from the Isle of Man and the Hebrides. On Good Friday, April 23d, 1014, the hostile armies met'on the plains of Clontarf, each resolved on victory or death. The place has thence been called the Marathon of Ireland. Both armies were in three divisions. The Danes had a thou- sand men in complete armor, and nine thousand Leinster troops, with their auxiliaries. A portion of Brien's followers were absent. The king of Meath, with a thousand soldiers, came obedient to Brien's call j but had a private understanding with the king of Leinster, that he and his troops would desert Brien in the hour of battle. The conflict was tremendous — the carnage fearful. It began at sunrise, and till four in the afternoon the issue remained doubtful. The Irish battle- axe, wielded with one hand, cleft in twain the armed Dane at a single stroke ; but prodigies of valor were performed by all the combatants, and on both sides the victors of one moment fell vic- tims the next. According to some accounts > Brien's forces gained the day : according to others, the Danes at first gave way, but rallied, and at last prevailed. Brien, it is said, when he had harangued his forces in the early morning, and the signal for battle was given, was not allowed by his followers to head them in the strife, on 28 DUBLIN PREVIOUS TO ELEVENTH CENTURY. account of his great age, (eighty-three years,) but retired to his tent, where he was attacked, at the close of the engagement, by a party of Danes, and slain. On his side fell, also, his son, a long cata- logue of princely and noble leaders, together with from seven to eleven thousand men. On the other side fell the king of Leinster, almost all his princes and chiefs, and three thousand men : while the Danes lost their principal officers and fourteen thousand men, including the thousand in coats of mail, who, it is said, were all cut to pieces. After the battle, Sitricus, with the Irish Danes, returned to Dublin, and those from for- eign parts went on board their vessels, and set sail homewards. Some report that Brien's body and his son's were interred at Kilmainham, " a village about a mile from Dublin, near an old stone cross f but it is believed by others that his corpse was conveyed to Swords, and then removed, pursuant to his own directions, and buried in Armagh. Brien Boroomh is renowned for his superiority in statesmanship and in -music, equally as in war. What is said to have been his harp is preserved in the museum of the Dublin University; but its identity is apocryphal, and were it proved that the instrument was Brien' s, a cjeep sigh would escape one on looking at the relic, that, unlike the harp of the son of Jesse, it was seldom or never tuned to allay an evil spirit, or to celebrate the glorious grace of the Messiah's reign. DUBLIN SUBJECT TO ENGLISH PAPAL RULE. 29 SECTION II. DUBLIN SUBJECT TO THE ENGLISH PAPAL RULE. . We have mentioned that the Danes of Dublin exchanged heathenism for Christianity, in its Roman form, about the year 948. The Black Book of Christ Church has the fol- lowing account of the origin of that edifice : — " Sitricus, king of Dublin, son of Ableb, earl of Dublin, gave to the Blessed Trinity, and to Donate, first bishop of Dublin, a place on which to build a church of the Blessed Trinity, where the arches or vaults were founded, with the fol- lowing lands, viz. : Beal-duleck, [now Baldoyle,] llechen, Portrahern, with their villeins, cows, and corn : he also contributed gold and silver enough wherewith to build the church and the whole court thereof/' The "arches or vaults" are thought to have been places which had been used for storing merchandise, though others conjecture that they were rather cells for devotion. Donate became bishop of Dublin in 1038, and died in 1074. The Church of the Holy Trinity, erected by him as above, afterwards became Christ Church Cathedral. He also built the Chapel of St. Michael, which, in course of time, was changed into a parish-church. 30 DUBLIN SUBJECT TO It is probable that the Danes of Dublin received their Christianity from England, by communica- tion with ecclesiastics in that country. Indications of connection with Rome, through Canterbury, are not wanting in the casa of Bishop Donate ; but that connection becomes apparent in the case of Donate' s successor, Patrick. Sir James Ware, in his " Bishops of Ireland/' gives the letter which the king of Dublin sent with Patrick to Lanfranc, the English primate, requesting his consecration, as having been chosen by the clergy and citizens to be their bishop. Ware gives also the formal vow of canonical obedience which Patrick made to Lanfranc and his successors. Ware furnishes likewise two letters which Patrick brought back with him from Lanfranc — one to Godfrid, king of Dublin, and the other to Tirdelvac, king of Ireland : both of them written in that compli- mentary, patronizing, admonitoiy, and hortatory strain, which dignified ecclesiastics of those days, as of our own, well knew how to employ for their purposes, in addressing secular lords. This Tir- delvac is the same king to whom, as Lanigan mentions, Pope Gregory VII., Hildebrand, sent a letter, " much in the style of several others which he wrote to several kings, princes, etc., for the purpose of claiming not only a spiritual, but likewise a temporal and political superiority over all the kingdoms and principalities of Europe. Having insinuated his claim over Ireland, he con- cludes with giving directions to Tirdelvac, etc., to refer to him whatever affairs the settling of which may require his assistance." Thus did the THE ENGLISH PAPAL RULE. 31 pope's temporal power over nations and -their rulers come in, as it were by stealth, behind his spiritual power. And as it was in the days of Hildebrand, so it is in those of Pio Nono. Usher, in his "Religion of the Ancient Irish," gives the following letter from Henry I. of Eng- land to his primate, ordering the consecration of a Dublin bishop, in 1121: " Henry, king of England, to Ralph, archbishop of Canterbury, greeting. The king of Ireland hath intimated unto me by his writ, and the burgesses of Dublin, that they have chosen this Gregory for their bishop, and send him unto you to be consecrated. Wherefore, I wish you, that satisfying their requests, you perform his consecration without delay. Witness — Ranulph, our chancellor at Windsor." Usher writes that "all the burgesses of Dublin, likewise, and the whole assembly of the clergy, directed their joint letters to the archbishop of Canterbury at the same time : wherein, among other things, they write thus : 1 Know you for verity that the bishops of Ireland have great indignation towards us, and that bishop most of all that dwelleth at Armagh, because we will not obey their ordination, but will always be under your government/ " Hence it appears what an opposition existed between the Irish and Romanist ecclesiastics of the country. The ex- pression used by the Dublin burgesses and clergy is even stronger than Usher has rendered it : "maximum zelum ercja nos"-*- il the greatest indignation towards us." The "indignation" was not less in the Romanists against the Irish. 32 DUBLIN SUBJECT TO There were essential ecclesiastical differences be- tween the two. The Irish churches were self- governed — owning no subjection to the pope. They freely, followed each its own mode of wor- ship : none of them used the Roman. Each church had its bishop : so much so that Roman divines censured Ireland for its "paganism" in having as many bishops as churches. The Irish clergy were not bound to celibacy; for among rules given for their style of dress, one is that their wives should have their heads veiled when they walk abroad. The Irish churches were charged by Romanists with not observing due order in ordaining bishops : in England, indeed, and on the Continent, the ministry of Irish- ordained clergy was often disallowed. The Roman laws with regard to matrimony, the use of chrism in baptism, and the observance of Easter, were not recognized by the Irish Christians. These differences gave rise to strong contentions when the parties came in contact elsewhere; and no doubt the bishops of Ireland looked upon the bishop of Dublin placing himself in the position of a suffragan to Canterbury, instead of being in fellowship with themselves, as the inhabitants of a besieged city would on a person who sought to open its gates to the foe. The jurisdiction of the Dublin bishop did not extend beyond the city. Limerick and Water- ford were each of them a bishop's see; and being, like Dublin, Danish settlements, their prelates were of the Roman order, and suffragans of Can- terbury. Gregory, whose application for conse- THE ENGLISH TAPAL RULE. 83 cration wo have mentioned, lived to see the long-cherished wishes of the pope and his English primate consummated, in all the Irish churches being placed as one under the sway of Rome. Early in the twelfth century, one Gillebert, who, as Lanigan thinks, had been ordained among the Irish, was invited by the people of Limerick to become their bishop. This changed his eccle- siastical relation, and he became intimate with Anselm, the archbishop of Canterbury. He took a journey to the continent, and was enamored with the Roman worship, as there celebrated. It occurred to him how much more orderly and respectable the Irish clergy and ritual would be, were they brought into conformity with Rome. The pope eventually made him his legate for Ire- land, and he wrote more than one treatise in furtherance of his favorite purpose. " It is prob- able," writes Lanigan, "that Gillebert was encour- aged in his proceedings by Anselm, although it can scarcely be supposed that Anselm supplied him with his bad arguments. " The same author adds, "Gillebert did not succeed, at least to any considerable degree, in setting aside the Irish offices." But the leaven spread. Malachi, bishop of Armagh, successor to the one alluded to in the Dublin letter which we have quoted above from Usher, entered into Gillebert' s views, and went to Rome to solicit two "palls" — one for Armagh, and the other for Cashel — making them archbishoprics. The pope received him graciously, appointed him legate for Ireland in- stead of Gillebert, who had become infirm through 2 34 DUBLIN SUBJECT TO age, and promised that the palls should be granted on their being applied for in due form, by dele- gates from a council of the clergy and chief men of the country. A council was held on Malachi's return, and ultimately Pope Eugenius sent Cardi- nal Paparo to Ireland, who conferred four palls : namely, one each upon Armagh, Dublin, Cashel, and Tuain. Thus all Ireland was brought into direct fellowship with the pope, and vowed alle- giance to him as her head. Dublin also ceased to be ecclesiastically subject to Canterbury, and became itself an archiepiscopal see. Then, or in a few years afterwards, several bishoprics in the neighborhood of the city, as Clondalkin, Tallaght, Taney, etc., were merged in the see of Dublin. The movement commenced by Gillebert had other than spiritual results. Within four years after Ireland received the palls, Henry II., king of England, obtained from Pope Adrian IV., as absolute sovereign of Ireland in his capacity of vicar of Christ, a bull, formally assigning over the country to Henry and his successors on the throne of England as its lords. The grant* was made by the pope to the king "for extending the borders of the Church, restraining the progress of vice, for the correction of manners, the plant- ing of virtue, and the increase of religion." It empowered Henry to "enter Ireland, and execute therein whatever shall pertain to the honor of God and the welfare of the land." It enjoined the people to "receive him honorably, and rever- ence him as their lord : the rights of their churches still remaining inviolate." It bound Henry and THE ENGLISH PAPAL RULE. 35 Lis successors to pay to the pope one penny annu- ally for each house in the country. It concluded by exhorting Henry to fulfil his mission for the good of Ireland, that he "might be entitled to the fullness of eternal reward from God, and obtain a glorious crown on earth throughout all ages." This bull from Adrian was variously con- firmed by his successors on the papal throne. Henry was too much occupied otherwise to act upon this bull at once. In the mean time, pre- parations were being made for his success, and no doubt the connection which had existed between Dublin and Canterbury favored his interests among the Danes in the former city. In 1162, Dermod, king of Leinster, brought these Danes and their king under his own power. Five years afterwards, O'Connor, king of Ireland, made war on Dermod and the Danes. Dermod, reduced to extremity, applied to the king of England for aid to regain his territories. Henry issued warrants to his subjects, commanding them to furnish Dermod with supplies. The principal person who espoused his cause was the Earl of Pembroke, surnamed a Strongbow," from his power in archery. To engage this lord in his interest, the king of Leinster promised him his daughter in marriage, and his crown in reversion. Strongbow came accordingly, and Dermod recovered his lost pos- sessions, made himself master of Dublin, and appointed Miles de Cogan, an English adventurer, commander of the place. Dermod died in 1171, and Strongbow became king of Leinster, includ- ing its metropolis, Dublin. Henry, hearing of 36 DUBLIN SUBJECT TO his success, became jealous; but tin earl visited England, and appeased Henry's wrath by con- senting to surrender Dublin to him, and to hold the province under him as liege-lord. In October, 1172, Henry himself crossed the channel from Milford to Waterford, with a fleet of two hundred and "forty vessels, bringing with him many of his court and nobility, four hundred knights or men-at-arms, and four thousand sol- diers. On landing, he received the submission of the English settlers : Strongbow did homage to him for the crown of Leinster ; and, in his progress towards Dublin, many of the Irish princes offered him their allegiance. At Dublin, Strong- bow formally ceded the city to him, and he ap- pointed Hugh de Lacy its governor, who bore the titles of bailiif, seneschal, and guardian or custos : under the Danes, its chief magistrate had been called " 3Ior Maer," Great Steward. Henry then went southward, and attended an ecclesias- tical council at Cashel, wherein all matters affect- ing the Irish churches were arranged according to the will of the Roman pontiff. On returning to the metropolis, he gave the laws of England to his Irish subjects, held a parliament, and estab- lished courts of Chancery, King's Bench, Com- mon Pleas, and Exchequer, on the model of those in London. Henry spent his Christmas in Dublin, with truly royal feasting and splendor. There being no place in the city large enough for his use, he " caused to be erected a royal palace, framed artificially of wattles, according to the custom of the country," on a spot outside the THE ENGLISH PAPAL RULE. 37 walls, where Dame lane enters George's street. This palace " was a long pavilion, like a cabin, which, being well-furnished with plate, household stuff, and good cheer, made a better appearance than ever had been before seen in Ireland. Many of the Irish princes nocked thither to pay their duty to the king, not without admiration and ap- plause of his magnificence/' His object herein was to establish his power in the country by at- taching the chiefs and people to himself, giving proofs of his good will towards them in order to secure theirs in return. Before his departure, at Easter, he granted the city of Dublin to the peo- ple of Bristol : " Wherefore," says the charter, " I will and firmly command that they do inhabit it, and hold it of me and of my heirs, well and in peace, freely and quietly, fully, and amply, and honorably, with all liberties and free customs which the men of Bristol have at Bristol, and through my whole land." Earl Strongbow died in 1177, and was buried with great solemnity in Christ Church cathedral, where a monument was placed to his memory, which still exists, though much injured and defaced. The record of his death states that he was interred "in sight of the cross." Happy had it been if all who undertook the cure of souls, in those and other times, had been as con- cerned that men should know the doctrine of the cross for their salvation while living, as the eccle- siastics who arranged the obsequies of Strongbow were to lay his corpse within view of the crucifix, which the spirit of Antichrist has substituted as 38 DUBLIN SUBJECT TO a refuge for the soul in the place of a living faith in Christ ! During the time that the English power was being established in Ireland, the archbishopric of Dublin was held by the celebrated Lawrence O'Toble. At first he opposed Henry's projects, but afterwards acquiesced in them. We read of him, that although he studiously avoided all popu- lar applause, yet his charity to the poor, and hospitality to the rich, could not be concealed. He caused every day, sometimes sixty, sometimes forty, and at least thirty poor men to be fed in his presence, besides many whom he otherwise relieved. He entertained the rich splendidly and elegantly, with variety of dishes, and several sorts of wines, yet never tasted of the repast himself, contented with coarser fare. In 1179, he attend- ed the second general council of the Lateran, and while there obtained a bull from the Pope Alex- ander, confirming the dioceses of Grlendalough, Kildare, Ferns, Leighlin, and Ossory, to his me- tropolitan see. When Cardinal Paparo gave palls to Armagh and Dublin, he did not sufficiently appoint in what relation the two sees should stand to each other. To Comyn, who followed 0' Toole in that of Dublin, Pope Honorius III. granted that he should be primate in his archdiocese, and that no prelate should have jurisdiction over him therein, save the pope or his legates. A controversy of some centuries' duration arose between Dublin and Armagh on this subject. The sign of pri lnatial rank and prerogative consisted in the cross THE ENGLISH PAPAL RULE. 39 of the prelate being carried upright before him. Popes, councils, parliaments, were variously ap- pealed to, and gave judgment variously. On one occasion, the archbishop of Armagh appeared at Howth with his cross erect, which some belong- ing to fhe Dublin party observing, they beat it down and drove him out of Leinster. At another time the archbishop of Armagh came to a parlia- ment in Dublin, under the king's warrant that he should have no molestation ; but the archbishop of Dublin would not allow him to appear, because he insisted on having his cross carried upright. In 1345, Fitz-Ralph, of Armagh, procured from King Edward III. authority to bear his cross erect in any part of Ireland. Accordingly he came to Dublin, and remained in the city three days, ex- hibiting the symbol of preeminence, asserting his claim, publicly reading the bulls of popes in support of it, and denouncing excommunication against any who should oppose it. Hewson, the lord justice, the prior of Kilmainham, and other high officials, interfered, (being induced to do so, it is said, by a bribe from the archbishop of Dub- lin,) and put a stop to those proceedings. Fitz- Ralph left the city in great anger. On reaching Drogheda he pronounced the curse of the Church on the parties who had dared to impugn his dignity. This alarmed and humbled them. The Kilmainham prior himself, seized with dan- gerous illness, sent deputies to confess his sin, and implore absolution. He died before their return, and his remains were refused Christian burial; but the grace desired being at length 40 DUBLIN SUBJECT TO vouchsafed, they were then allowed a resting- place in consecrated ground. The next archhishop of Dublin received letters from Edward, revoking those given to Fitz-Ralph, on the ground that the latter had been obtained through misrepresenta- tion. Finally, Pope Innocent VI.' brought the dispute to a close, by ordaining that Armagh should be primate of all Ireland, and Dublin primate of Ireland, answering to the difference, ecclesiasti- caily, between Canterbury and York in England. We must now retrace our steps, and notice matters which, in order to avoid breaking the thread of our narrative, we refrained from allud- ing to before. The establishment of the abbey of St. Mary, on the north side of the Liffey, and the building of the church of the Holy Trinity, or Christ Church, and that of St. Michael, in the heart of the city, have been mentioned. In 1095, the church of St. Michan was founded between Ost- mantown and Mary's Abbey, by a Dane of that name; and about a century later, archbishop Comyn demolished the old parochial church of St. Patrick, and»erected and endowed a cathedral in its place. In 1146, the nunnery of St. Mary de Hoggins was built not far from the eastern gate of the city, which thence took the name of Dame's Gate, and the memorial of the nunnery is still preserved in the names Dame street and Dame lane. Twenty years later, the great mon- astery of All-Hallows was erected where Trinity College now stands ; and in the same year was also founded the priory of All-Hallows, at Hog- THE ENGLISH PAPAL RULE. 41 gin's-green, now called Stephen's-green : both the monastery and the priory sprang from the zeal of Dermod, king of Leinster. About the same time, St. Andrew's church was built where the Cattle Market is at present. The abbey of St. Thomas was erected by Fitz-Audelin, butler to Henry II., and its situation is yet known as Thomas court, and Thomas street : it was, how- ever, then " near" Dublin. Earl Strongbow erected the priory of Knights' Templars at Kil- mainham, where now stands the Royal Hospital : their grounds extended across the river, including a portion of the Phoenix Park. In 1188, the priory of St. John the Baptist was built by Alured de Palmer, on what is, in our day, the north side of Thomas street. And, in 1202, William Mar- shall, earl of Pembroke, established the priory of St. Saviour, on the site of the present Four Courts. In 1235, the abbey of St. Francis was erected, and from it afterwards was taken the name of Francis street. In 1259, the monastery of the Holy Trinity was founded by Earl Talbot, where Crow street theatre stood in modern time. The abbey of Witeschan, for Friars Penitent, was founded near the Coombe in 1268 ; and ten years later the monastery of Carmelites, or White Friars, was founded by Sir Robert Bagot, near the pre- sent Whitefriars street. The churches of St. Nicholas Within, St. Werburgh's, St. Owen's, (now Audoen's,) and St. Catharine's, are believed to have existed at that period. So that the Dub- lin of the thirteenth century must have been well supplied with ecclesiastical buildings. Some of 42 DUBLIN SUBJECT TO these establishments had immense property, and their heads were lords of parliament, who had great influence in political affairs. The " wall and tower" with which the Danes encompassed Dublin for its defence when they first became masters of it, were, of course, built of masonry, probably, however, of a somewhat rude and frail kind, a step or two in advance upon the "forts" which universal tradition as- cribes to them, and which are so frequently met with in the country. In the year 1000, they re- paired and added to the fortifications, which then became of considerable strength. The city wall went, it is believed, from Cork Hill on the east down to within' some distance of the river, then along, or rather above, the present Cook street, running up the hill through Owen's or Audoen's Arch, and afterwards, a few yards below the top of the rise on the south side, took its course east- ward till it reached Cork Hill. There were seve- ral gates : one on the east, called Dame's Gate ; another towards the west, called Owen's Gate; a third on the north, or north-west, near the present Winetavern street, leading to the river; and a fourth on the south side. Early in the thirteenth century, it was judged that the city required greater security ; and on a representation made to that effect by Meyler Fitz-Henry, the lord justice, or, as the English would say, the lord lieu- tenant, king John granted him a commission to " erect a castle there, in such competent place as he should judge most expedient, as well to curb the city as to defend it, if occasion should so re- THE ENGLISH PAPAL RULE. 43 quire, and to make it as strong as he could with good and durable walls.' ' It was, if so much could be accomplished, to be a " palace" as well as a " castle." To aid the work, John assigned to Fitz-Henry a debt of three hundred marks (£200) due to the king by one Jeffrey Fitz-Robert. He also ordered the inhabitants to improve the city defences, to defray the cost of which he appointed them an annual fair to be held for eight days, be- ginning on the festival of the " Invention of the Holy Cross/' It is thought that the " castle" was finished by the archbishop Henry Loundres, in 1220. It was built on the site occupied by its present successor. The entrance to it was on its north side, from what is called, in consequence, " Castle street," and was secured by two towers, a portcullis, and a drawbridge. What now forms the Lower Castle Yard and parts adjoining, were then called "Sheep's Land," (whence Ship street,) and a lodgment of water there was called the " City Ditch." In 1215, the citizens obtained a royal license to build a bridge over the Liffey where they pleased. The site chosen was probably where we have conjectured the old Ford to have been ; and from this bridge the street leading to it from the city naturally came to be called "Bridge street." "High street," named from its position, was burned down in 1285, and the year following the greater part of the city was con- sumed. It is recorded to the honor of the in- habitants, that they first made a collection to repair the damage done to Christ Church, " before they thought of reedifying their own houses." 44 DUBLIN SUBJECT TO The reader has been informed that Henry II. gave special encouragement to his loving subjects of Bristol to settle in Dublin. A gloomy event followed in connection with their having taken advantage of his permission. Easter Monday, ordinarily accounted bright, acquired the name of " Black Monday." * l The occasion of Black Monday," writes Ware in his "Antiquities," anno 1209, "and the original remembrance thereof, arose in Dublin. The city of Dublin, by" reason of some great mortality, being waste and desolate, the inhabitants of Bristol nocked thither to dwell, who, after their country manner upon holy-days, some for love of the fresh air, some to avoid idle- ness, some other for pastime, pleasure, and gaming sake, nocked out of the town towards Cullen's Wood upon Monday in Easter-week. The Beirnes and Tooles, (the mountain enemies,) like wolves, lay in ambush for them, and upon finding them unarmed, fell upon them, and slew three hundred men, besides women and children which they led in their hands. Although, shortly after, the town was upon the report thereof soon peopled again by Bristolians, yet that dismal day is yearly re- membered, and solemnly observed by the mayor, sheriffs, and citizens, with feast and banquet, and pitching of tents in that place, in most brave sort, daring the enemy upon his peril not to be so hardy as ever to approach near their feasting camp." This custom was continued for some centuries. At last, on Easter Monday, in 1578, "the wind and rain were so violent that neither bowmen nor shot could go abroad;" and brave THE ENGLISH PAPAL RULE. 45 as the then chief magistrate and his compeers might be to face the human " mountain enemies," they shrank from encountering the terrible war of elements. Nor did their valorous successors in following years, except on one occasion, ever feel called upon to resume this old champion-like celebration of " Black Monday." In the latter half of the thirteenth century, warm contests arose between the spiritual and the civic rulers of the city. So excessive were the " dues" exacted by the clergy for church services and purposes, that it was resolved to limit their power and reduce their demands. This incensed the archbishop Fulk de Sandford. He excom- municated the mayor and other secular officials, placed the city under an interdict, and had the inhabitants denounced by the pope's legate then in London. In 1268, Sir Robert de Ufford, the lord justice, brought about an adjustment. Among the terms agreed upon were the follow- ing : — If a citizen were guilty of a public sin, he might commute its punishment for a sum of money : if he persisted in it, and it were great and public, he was to be cudgelled (fustigetui-) about the church : on that proving insufficient to reform him, he was to be cudgelled, before the processions made to the cathedrals ; and in case he was still impenitent, he was to be expelled the city or cudgelled through it. The modern use of the horsewhip in Ireland, for administering Rom- anist pastoral discipline, might refer to the above agreement as its precedent. Honorable mention is made of John le Dacer, 46 DUBLIN SUBJECT TO the first "provost" of Dublin, as having been a great public benefactor. Besides building two chapels and granting other liberalities to the Church, he provided a marble cistern for the city conduit, such as had never been seen before : he also erected a new bridge over the Liffey, and in a time of scarcity sent out three ships and brought over a supply of corn, bestowing one cargo on the lord justice and the militia, and a second on the Dominican and Augustin friars, reserving the third for the exercise of his own hospitality and bounty. The last-named generosity probably oc- curred in 1310, for we are told that in that year the bakers of Dublin were drawn on hurdles at the tails of horses, through the streets, for using false weights and for other malpractices, during a famine when a " crannoch" of wheat (four Win- chester bushels) sold for twenty shillings, the price in England a few years before (1288) hav- ing been only fourpence per bushel. Another famine occurred in 1331, when the distress of the citizens was singularly " relieved by a pro- digious shoal of fish, called ' turleyhides/ being cast on shore at the mouth of the Dodder. They were from thirty to forty feet long, and so thick that men standing on each side one of them could not see those on the other. Upwards of two hun- dred of them were killed by the people/' Besides famine, pestilence frequently made havoc in the cfty. One that occurred in 1348 carried off " vast numbers" — a writer of the time says, " fourteen thousand ! " A second came in 1361 ; a third, yet more destructive, in 1370 ; THE ENGLISH PAPAL RULE. 47 and a fourth in 1383, which "destroyed abun- dance of people/ 7 Of one in 1439, "three thou- sand" persons died; of another in 1447, "vast multitudes died." What was the state of medical practice in Dublin during the times we are speak- ing of cannot be satisfactorily ascertained ; but a statement in Messrs. Warburton, Whitelaw, and "Walsh's History, may suggest to us that the heal- in cr art was studied anions the Irish and in Dub- lin at even an earlier period. "In passing," say the authors, " through Mitre alley, an obscure part of the old city, near St. ^Patrick's Cathedral, the eye is attracted by an angular sign-board pro- jecting from the wall, on which is the following inscription, ' Domestic medicine prescribed from Irish manuscripts,' and a couplet of Irish poetry, which is literally, ' Christ, the sick relieve : to their aid I Thee implore/ Attracted by this no- tice, we visited the doctor, in the hope of meet- ing those Irish manuscripts from which he derived his prescriptions. Nor were we disappointed. We found an old man of a genuine Milesian as- pect, possessed of seventy-three very old and valuable volumes of vellum, bound in modern covers. They contained several thousand recipes in Latin and Irish, written in a very beautiful but very old Irish character. The title-pages were wanting, but they were supposed to be a collection of native and other recipes made in the thirteenth century, and from that period traditionally de- scending from family to family." Dublin had no school of learning after she be- came Roman, previous to the fourteenth century. 48 DUBLIN SUBJECT TO In 1313, Archbishop Leek obtained from Pope Clement V. a bull for founding "the university of scholars at Dublin," and in seven years more his successor, Bieknor, procured another bull from Pope John XXII. , renewing and confirming the former. Bieknor applied himself with much spirit to perfect the design. The rules of this college are given by Ware. It had power to con- fer degrees, and at its opening several persons received that of doctor in divinity, and Bodiart, dean of St. Patrick's, was made doctor in canon law and chancellor of the university. It was held in St. Patrick's Cathedral. King Edward III. appointed for the university a professor of di- vinity, enlarged the original endownent, and by special writ granted his protection and safe con- duct to the students while going and returning. It had, however, only a feeble and hardly- sustained existence. A vigorous attempt was made to revive it in 1496, when Archbishop Fitz-Simons, at a council held in Christ Church, " assigned certain stipends to the lecturers in the university at Dublin, payable yearly by himself and his suffragans." But we hear nothing of it afterwards. In Bicknor's day, indolence and mendicancy seem to have been rampant in Dublin, and he laudably sought to promote industry as well as learning among the people. There was formerly " extant in the registry of St. Mary's Abbey an account of a remarkable sermon preached by him in Christ Church, .against sloth and idleness; wherein he bitterly complained of the mischiefs THE ENGLISH PAPAL RULE. 49 arising from the strangers and beggars who infest- ed the city and suburbs of Dublin; and so warm was he in his discourse, that he cursed every one that would not exercise some trade or calling every day, more or less. His sermon had such an influence that the then mayor of Dublin ex- ercised his authority on the occasion, and would not suffer any person within his liberties but such as spun or knitted as they walked the streets. Even the begging friars were not excused." The evils thus rebuked and corrected came to the metropolis from the provinces, where we have reason to believe they prevailed a century and a half later. King Henry VII. inquired of Fitz- Simon, archbishop of Dublin, when the latter waited on him at court, why his Irish subjects so often rebelled and made no improvement under the English rule, notwithstanding the advantages which the country afforded. Fitz-Simon referred the king to an explanation he had sent to his majesty in a letter some time before, ascrib- ing the poverty and discontent of the Irish to their " idleness." Let us rejoice that, what- ever may have been the facts of the case then, a disposition towards industry and self-reliance is now growing up rapidly among the people, and that they are, in all parts of the country, coming to regard it as a maxim of common sense and an element of social prosperity, not less than an ordinance of God's word and a principle of his providence, that " If any will not work, neither shall he eat." Edward Bruce, brother to the celebrated Ro- 50 DUBLIN SUBJECT TO bert, king of Scotland, invaded the north of Ire- land about the year 1815, marched thence towards Dublin, and, encamping at Castleknock, placed the city in imminent danger. The citizens, to protect themselves, burned some of the suburbs on the west, and, besides other additions to their defences, they built a new wall on the north side of the town, along what is now Merchant's Quay, about four hundred feet nearer the river than the old line. Bruce burned St. Mary's Abbey and plundered St. Patrick's Cathedral, but observing that the city was well prepared to stand a siege, he withdrew towards Naas. Less than a century afterwards, the citizens returned the visit of the Scots ; for, in June, 1405, they fitted out a fleet and " invaded Scotland at St. Ninian's," where their forces " behaved themselves valiantly and did much mischief." They subsequently sailed down the channel and committed some de- predations on the coast of Wales, bringing back with them the shrine of St. Cubie, which trophy they deposited among the relics in Christ Church. For the great services thus rendered by the citi- zens in creating division among his enemies the Scots and Welsh, King Henry IV. granted that the mayor of Dublin should thenceforth have a gilt sword borne before him, for the honor of the king and his heirs, as was customary with the mayor of London. Feuds and disaffections prevailing in Ireland, to the weakening, if not peril, of the English power there, King Richard II. had funds for visit- ing that country placed at his disposal by his THE ENGLISH PAPAL RULE. 51 clergy and parliament. At Michaelmas, 1894, he landed at Waterford with four thousand men- at-arms and thirty thousand archers, the duke of Gloucester, ^he earls of Nottingham and Rutland, and other of his nobility, accompanying him. To give gorgeousness to his state, he brought with him his crown jewels. Not fewer than seventy- five Irish chiefs, each bearing the title of " king," waited upon him in Dublin and humbly tendered their submissions. They were perfectly charmed with his royal pomp and hospitality, and perhaps were yet more pleasurably excited by the con- descending notices to which so great a potentate admitted them, for Richard and his courtiers con- versed with them, through Castile, one of his at- tendants, and the Earl of Ormond, both of whom understood the Irish language. The four prin- cipal princes were treated with marked favor above the rest. They were informed that his majesty was disposed to confer upon them the order of knighthood. But, in their simplicity, they did not at first understand the value of this grace, and they expressed some surprise that knighthood should be considered any addition to the rank they already held. " Every Irish king," they said, " makes his son a i knight' at seven years old, or, in case of his death, the next kins- man. We assemble/' they continued, " in a plain : the candidates run with slender lances against a shield fastened on a stake : he who breaks the greatest number is distinguished by particular honors attached to his new dignity." Richard and his great men acknowledged such 52 DUBLIN SUBJECT TO . proofs of early prowess to be highly praiseworthy ; but it was explained that all the states of Europe adopted a more solemn form in bestowing knightly honor. The ceremonial was described in detail, and the four Irish princes, being now able to ap- preciate the boon, accepted it with due thanks at Richard's hand, in Christ Church Cathedral, March 25th, 1395, after which these royal personages, thus exalted above their former selves, appeared in robes of state, and were seated at the king's table. Richard having spent nine months in Ireland, was hurried home by information from the archbishop of York and the bishop of London, that in England religion and the Church were in much danger through the spread of Lollard- ism. The prelates told him that the reformers had gone so far as to make appeals to the parliament, and that that body had received them with a degree of attention that greatly alarmed the clergy, so that the king's own piety and authority alone could save the faith from utter ruin. Notwithstanding the great spread of Wycliffe's doctrines in England, few traces exist of their having found their way into Dublin, which is the more remarkable from the constant communica- tion which was kept up between that country and the Irish metropolis. But there is evidence that about the time of Wycliffe's birth (1324) opin- ions the reverse of what were deemed orthodox existed in the city. In the year 1327, "Adam Duffe 0' Toole was convicted of blasphemy in Dublin, namely, for denying the incarnation of THE ENGLISH PAPAL RULE. 5o Christ, the Trinity in unity; for affirming that the blessed Virgin was an harlot j that there was no resurrection ; that the Scriptures were a mere fable, and that the apostolical see was an impos- ture and usurpation ; and the next year, pursuant to his sentence, was burned on Hoggin Green, near Dublin." It is not unlikely that this man held Waldensian principles ) if so, persons ac- quainted with the representations made of those tenets by Romanist writers, well know what weight is to be attached to the charge of denying the In- carnation, the Trinity, and the inspiration of the Scriptures. Shortly before this trial and execution of O'Toole, namely, in 1324, Lady Alice Kettle, William Outlaw, her son, and two other persons, are said to have been charged with " witchcraft and enchantments," in the spiritual court of Os- sory; but another authority, judged by Ware to be more trustworthy, records that her ladyship suffered death for heresy, and that she was the first that was ever known to suffer for that crime in Ireland. The chief magistrate of Kilkenny favored the delinquents. His bishop, Ledred, ac- cused him of heresy, excommunicated him, and had him committed to the castle in Dublin. The prior of Kilmainham, however, then lord justice, treated him kindly. The bishop, enraged, went to Dublin, and there charged " heresy" upon the lord justice. A parliament was summoned, who appointed a committee of inquiry. " They examined the wit- nesses apart, and every one of them made oath that the justice was orthodox, a zealous champion 54 DUBLIN SUBJECT TO of the faith, and ready to defend it with his life. Upon this report of the committee he was solemnly acquitted, and prepared a sumptuous banquet for all his defenders." A year or two subsequently, Ledred was himself accused of heresy by his metropolitan, Bicknor, and appealed to the judg- ment of the pope, who exempted him from Bick- nor' s jurisdiction. We have no means of knowing certainly what the " heresy" was which parties thus charged upon each other. It may have in- volved no very serious departure from the faith received and enforced by the Boorish Church; but, on the other hand, it may have been a near approach to evangelical truth. At all events, after Bicknor's death, Pope Clement VI. sent a commission to the new archbishop " to make in- quisition against all such heretics as had fled from the prosecution of Bichard Ledred, bishop of Ossory, into the diocese of Dublin, and had been protected by Alexander Bicknor, and to bring them to due punishment according to the canons." Bale, to whom we shall refer hereafter, in his book entitled " The Great Process against Lord Cobham," having noticed the act of the English parliament, which declared Lollardism to be both treason and heresy, and ordained that a convicted Lollard should be first hung in chains for his treason and then burned for his heresy, says that " many were taken in divers quarters and suffered most cruel deaths. And many fled out of the land into Germany, Bohemia, France, Spain, Por- tugal, and into the Weld [ Wold, open country] of Scotland, Wales, and Ireland, working there THE ENGLISH PAPAL RULE. 55 many marvels against their false kingdom too long to write. " Hence it appears that some Lollards came to Ireland ; but had they been in consider- able numbers, or made much stir in favor of their principles, more information would have been pre- served respecting them than has been handed down to our time. In the year 1489, " niusquets" were brought to Dublin from Germany, and six of them, as a great rarity, were presented to Gerald, Earl of Kildare, then lord deputy, which he put into the hands of his guards, as they stood sentinels before his house in Thomas court. They are sup- posed to have been the firs£ firearms even seen in Ireland. The impostor Simnel, who had been trained by an Oxford priest to personate the deceased Earl of Warwick, and claimed to be the rightful heir to the English throne, came to Dublin in 1486, and was received by the Earl of Kildare, then lord justice, and other chief officials, with all respect and submission, they being warm partisans of the house of York. He was crowned in Christ Church, under the style of Edward VI. The crown used on the occasion was taken from the image of the Virgin in the nunnery of St. Mary, already mentioned, between the city gate and Hoggin's green, afterwards "College" green. But the year following, the cause of Simnel having become desperate, the ma} T or, Jenicho Marks, humbly besought mercy for himself and the citi- zens from King Henry VII., pleading in apology for their misdeeds the example that had been set 56 DUBLIN SUBJECT TO tliem by the king's representative, the Archbishop of Dublin, and most of the clergy in the country except the Primate of Armagh. In June, 1488, Sir Richard Edgecumbe came with a royal com- mission to receive new oaths of fidelity from the lord deputy, with the nobility, clergy, and people who had been engaged in the revolt, and to grant them a full pardon. It may be observed, as indi- cating the state of education in the city at this period, that several of the parties who subscribed the application to the king for forgiveness, did so by affixing their mark to it, being unable to write. Dublin, under Roman ecclesiastical rule, had its pageant performances on sacred days. The reader will form an idea of these exhibitions by the following outline of the provision for one in the procession on Corpus Christi festival : the account will also show the existence and names of the several city guilds. The glovers were to represent Adam and Eve, with an angel bearing a sword before them. The curriers, Cain and Abel, with an altar and their offering. The ma- riners and vintners, Noah and the persons in his ark, apparelled in the habit of carpenters and salmon-takers. The weavers personated Abraham and Isaac, with their offering and altar. The smiths, Pharaoh and his host. The skinners, the camel, with the children of Israel. The gold- smiths were to find the King of Cullen — (who was he ?) The hoopers, or coopers, were to find the shepherds, with an angel singing Gloria in excehis Deo. Corpus Christi guild was to find Christ in his passion, with the Maries and angels. THE ENGLISH PAPAL RULE. 57 The tailors were to find Pilate with his fellowship, and his wife clothed accordingly. The barbers, Annas and Caiaphas. The fishers, the apostles. The merchants, the prophets. And the butchers, the tormentors. The reader may comment on the list as he will. Doubtless each corporation felt a gratification in doing its part well, though the degree of complacency must have varied ac- cording to the honor and excellency of what it had to personify. What was reckoned an act of gross sacrilege was perpetrated in Dublin, early in the reign of Henry VIII. The partisans of the lord deputy Kildare, and those of the Earl of Orniond, met in St. Patrick's cathedral professedly for an ami- cable conference with a view to adjust differences which had led to much asperity between them. It was a stratagem, however, on the part of Or- niond and his people to get Kildare and his fol- lowers into their power. Words soon gave place to blows. Some of the arrows of Kildare' s men stuck in the images of the sacred edifice. The daring profanation was reported to the pope, who in his clemency absolved the citizens, but, "in detestation of the deed, and to keep up the me- mory of it for ever," ordained that " the mayor of Dublin should walk barefoot through the city in open procession before the sacrament on Corpus Christi day yearly" — a penance duly submitted to till the Reformation, and the performance of which must have given much interest to the fes- tival. The year 1535 saw Dublin in one of the great- £>8 ' DUBLIN SUBJECT TO est of its many perils. Fitzgerald, son of the lord deputy, was left in charge of it while his father went to England. A rumor was spread that the latter had been seized and beheaded in London. The son, on the 11th of June, came with a party of a hundred and forty horse, and made a formal and entire resignation of his authority to the chancellor, and then forthwith raised the standard of rebellion. He demanded liberty to pass through the city in order to besiege the castle, giving the magistrates some time to consider their reply. In this interval, a large supply of provisions and means of defence were conveyed into the castle. Alderman John Fitz-Shnons, on his own account, furnished its commander with twenty-two tuns of wine, twenty-four of beer, two hundred dried ling, sixteen hogsheads of powdered beef, twenty cham- bers for mines, and an iron chain for the draw- bridge, forged in his own house to avoid suspicion. The citizens then, with the commander's con- currence, agreed to Fitzgerald's demand, on the condition that no injury should be done to them- selves. They had at first sent a messenger to the king for help, and he brought an encouraging answer. The rebels killed Archbishop Allen when he attempted to escape ; and they broke faith with the citizens, by threatening to place some of the children of the latter on their works, to deter the garrison in the castle from firing upon the be- siegers. The citizens at last closed their gates, imprisoning the soldiers who were within the walls, and cutting them off from their comrades outside. Fitzgerald was absent from his camp. THE ENGLISH PAPAL RULE. 59 On hearing of what had occurred, he hastened back, attempted to take the city, but was repulsed and obliged to retire. The fidelity of the citizens was not unrewarded. The king, Henry VIII., by letters patent, dated February 4, 1538, after reciting the " siege, famine, miseries, wounds, and loss of blood, " they had suffered, granted them "all the building and estates belonging to the dissolved monastery of All-hallows, near Dublin, lying in the counties of Dublin, Meath, Louth, Kildare, Tipperary, Kilkenuy, and elsewhere in Ireland, at the rent of four pounds, four shillings, and three farthings/ 7 And, further, to repair the weakened and ruined great forts and towers of the city and its walls, he confirmed to them, for ever, a formal grant of nearly forty pounds a year, with an annual gift of twenty pounds from him- self. The hill on which Dublin stood was not yet entirely cleared of the " hazel-wood' ' which at first gave it the name of "Ath-Cliath," for the annals record that during the quarrels between the two factions of Orniond and Kildare, the former "came down with a great host of Irish- men, and encamped in Thomas Court Wood/' What is now Dame street was then an " avenue" leading from the city gate to Hogges, or Hoggin' s, Green. 60 DUBLIN DURING SECTION III. DUBLIN DURING THE BRITISH REFORMATION. The city had been for five hundred years under the spiritual yoke of Romanism, and, during nearly four centuries out of the five, the secular power of England had, for upholding its own in- terests, been joined with that spiritual dominion in both countries. In profound yet contented servitude to the pope, Ireland remained till Henry VIII. had numbered more than thirty years on the English throne. Continental Europe had been convulsed throughout : the monk of Wit- temberg had made the Vatican quake to its foun- dations : Great Britain was in the midst of the tumult attending a revolution in her faith ; but Ireland slumbered on, as if drugged to stolidity or death under the pontiff's sway. Having little intercourse with other nations, she was so engross- ed with the local interests and strifes of her peo- ple, that she neither cared for nor knew much of what was passing elsewhere. Many of the Irish clergy, same even of prelatic rank, were ignorant, indoJent, and immoral ; and occasionally their ex- actions were painfully oppressive. But the clergy were considered the almoners of grace, and the lords of conscience, and it was believed that in IIIE BRITISH REFORMATION. 61 proportion to the amount of "carnal tilings " de- manded by the Church, and to the cheerfulness with which those demands were acquiesced in, would be the degree of heavenly benediction vouchsafed from the " holy mother" to her much- loved and much-loving children. Priest-ridden as the latter were, the want of self-respect and self-reliance, the want of manly independent thought and action, the habit of hanging upon others and succumbing to them, which Popery generates, tended to keep the population at ease and even satisfied beneath, the sacerdotal yoke. Clerical influence then, as now, beguiled Irish patriotism to believe that English rule was the in- cubus to be got rid of in order to uplift the people, and that the papal supremacy must be clung to as the only protecting and sustaining agency that could deliver from what was denounced as a usurped and crushing tyranny. Little did its vic- tims think that the papal supremacy was itself the chief tyranny. When, therefore, Ireland first heard of the "Re- formation/' the intelligence stirred no kindling sympathy in her heart. Previous movements had more or less prepared other countries to welcome it. England had had its Wycliffe: Bohemia, its Husa and Jerome : Switzerland had its Zuingle : Ger- many, its Luther : France, its Calvin : Scotland, its Knox. But in Ireland no herald had come to prepare the way of the Lord : no native champion had arisen there to assert His claims upon her homage : no Irishman ventured to raise a banner for his brethren to rally round and escape from 62 DUBLIN DURING their Babylonian thrall : no Irishman lifted his voice to warn his brethren of the " mystery of iniquity" that bewitched them, and to proclaim to them the "mystery of godliness" which brings freedom and health, and life for evermore. What was at first, and for not a short time afterwards, done to make Ireland Protestant,, was for the most part effected by the English government obliging the clergy and laity to adopt the English ritual, as an obedience due to the king's will, and to be enforced by the king's authority. The project was dealt with as .a matter of state-regimen more than of conscience towards God. The aim was rather to secure conformity of " bodily ex- ercise" with outward regulations, than to renew the spirit to the faith of Christ ; and this conform- ity was sought by the application of pains and penalties, more than by the intelligent and kind persuasions of Christianity. Happily, there has been since learned " a more excellent way." When Henry received the crown, he was a zealous Romanist. Some dozen years after- wards came forth his book on the Seven Sacra- ments, written against Luther, and which obtained for him and his successors, from the pope, the title of " Defender of the Faith." In course of time, he found it convenient to repudiate the pa- pacy of Rome, and appropriate its prerogatives to himself over his own realm. But Romanism was still to be the religion of his country; the prin- cipal change being that he who was its sovereign was to be its pope also. Cardinal Wolsey, when legate, had seized forty monasteries, and applied THE BRITISH REFORMATION. 63 their properties to found a new college at Oxford. Henry judged that he could now do at his plea- sure what AYolsey had done ; and he disposed of the religious houses and estates in his kingdom accordiug to his royal will and pleasure. That he still designed no change of creed, except in the matter of supremacy, is evident from the act passed by his parliament, and called the " Bloody Bill," which, by its first provision, consigned any party who denied the " real presence" to death by burning, and allowed no mitigation of the sen- tence even if the heresy were solemnly abjured. After Henry's marriage with Catherine Parr, in 1543, he became less hostile to the reformers. But it was not till the accession of his son, Ed- ward VI., that the royalty of England became truly engaged for Protestantism. Next arose Mary, and, with her, Romanism returned to the high place from which it had been expelled. She was followed by Elizabeth, when a " uniformity" which excluded Romanism and often tried to an- nihilate English Puritanism, was affirmed, and was continued under her successor, James I. It may be thought that the contents of the foregoing paragraphs are foreign to our subject — that they concern England, Ireland, and the Reformation, rather than Dublin. ■ But the well- informed reader is aware how much proceedings about religion bore on the affairs of the city, and how closely the history of Ireland's metropolis is interwoven with that of Ireland itself, and of England alsto. Greorge Brown, provincial of the Augustinians Gl DUBLIN DURING in England, was consecrated archbishop of Dub- lin, in March, 1535, in the place of Allen, whose murder has been already noticed. He was ap- pointed a commissioner for abolishing the pope's supremacy, and establishing that of the king in Ireland. The task, however, proved greater than he was equal to, in consequence of the devoted- ness of the Irish clergy to the Roman pontiff. He advised the lord Cromwell that a parliament should be convened to carry the measure, which was done in the year following, when Brown pro- posed the act for establishing the king's suprem- acy, " in a short speech," setting forth that kings were head over all in their dominions, that even Christ paid tribute to Ciesar, and that kings and emperors, in the early ages of the Church, gov- erned bishops and even popes themselves. Lord Brabazon seconded Brown's proposal, and it was adopted. The pope was quickly apprised of this, and sent over a bull of excommunication against all who should acknowledge Henry's claim, and great numbers of the clergy and laity, English as well as Irish, set themselves against it. However, through many difficulties, Henry's government kept its stand in Dublin and in the country. On the loth of June, 1541, another parliament met in Dublin, and ordained that henceforth Ire- land should be made a " kingdom" instead of a "lordship," as hitherto, and that the king of England should be also "king" of Ireland. The contents of this statute were announced the next Sunday in St. Patrick's Cathedral, in presence of the lord deputy and many peers in their robes THE BRITISH KEFORMATION. 65 of state, with other principal persons ecclesiasti- cal and secular. On that occasion, royal grace was exercised in pardoning and liberating prison- ers. There were also great feastings, tourna- ments, and running at the ring on horseback, with grand civic processions in which the mayor bore the mace before the lord deputy; and the comedy of the " Nine Worthies" was acted for the entertainment of the citizens. The same par- liament which gave to Henry the style and title of " king of Ireland/' also confirmed to him the full and free disposal of all its abbeys and other religious houses, a power which he had already exercised upon some of those in and near Dublin. It is said that Brown, before he left England to be made archbishop of Dublin, " advised the people to make their applications to Christ alone, for which doctrine he was much taken notice of." Probably his bias against the Roman opinions of mediation, inclined him to favor the king's" su- premacy. After coming to Ireland, he became yet more favorable to the reformed views. In 1538, he obtained a warrant for removing images and relics from his cathedrals, a measure which greatly provoked the Romanist party. But, though sincere, Brown had not the bold, God- trusting zeal, required in a reformer. He was fettered and enfeebled by his belief in the king's supremacy over the creed and the Church, and could not make any movement in favor of religion without sanction from the court. Not until the fifth year of Edward VI. were decided steps taken towards introducing the re- 66 DUBLIN DURING formed faith into Ireland. Under date of Feb- ruary 6, 1551, a royal order came to the lord deputy that the Church Liturgy, as it had been translated into English, should be used in the Irish churches. The order was laid before an as- sembly of the prelates and other leading clergy, called together in Dublin. Some of them were exasperated at the king's interference in Church affairs. Dowdal, the Armagh primate, threatened the deputy with the clergy's curse; and after warm contention, he and many others withdrew. Brown gave, as his reason for accepting the order, the duty of obeying his king. A proclamation was issued enjoining the use of the new liturgy, but it intimated no change in this prayer-book of King Edward from the old mass-book, except the circumstance of its being a translation into Eng- lish. Public worship was first celebrated accord- ing to the new rubric, on Easter Sunday, in Christ Church Cathedral, before the lord deputy and other authorities. Few churches in the coun- try adopted it. A new lord deputy endeavored to conciliate Dowdal, but in vain : so the primacy was withdrawn from Armagh and transferred to Dublin. Brown became primate of all Ireland \ and Dowdal left the country, but did not formally vacate his archbishopric. King Edward's prayer-book is believed to have been the first instance of printing in Ireland. Its title ran — ■" The Boke of common prayer and administracion of Sacramentes and other Rites and Ceremonies of the Churche after the use of the Churche of England. Dubliniae, in ofiicina THE BRITISH REFORMATION. 67 Humfredi Poweli, cum privilegio ad imprinien- duui solum. Anno Domini M.D.LI." The government found it almost impossible to supply ecclesiastical vacancies with men of Pro- testant convictions. Two divines, however, came to Dublin in 1552, namely, Hugh G-oodacre, ap- pointed to Armagh, which Dowdal had abandoned though not resigned, and John Bale, appointed to Ossory. They were consecrated by Brown and other prelates, in Christ Church Cathedral, on the 2d of February. Brown and his assistants in the ceremony were for using the old Roman form on the occasion, lest, by adopting the English one, they should offend prejudice and create disturb- ance. Goodacre was willing to meet their wishes, but Bale, who was made of sterner stuff, would not consent. The point was yielded to him. He also required that the " altar" should be covered with a cloth as a "table," and that " nonprinted" bread, not the " wafer," should be had for the communion ; and to his wishes in this respect Brown and his co-prelates had to give way. To their great surprise, no tumult ensued. Grood- acre died in Dublin about three months after- wards : his death was ascribed to poison. Bale went to his charge, and of his ministry wrote : — ■ " My first proceedings were these : I earnestly exhorted the people to repentance for sin, and required them to give credit to the gospel of sal- vation j to acknowledge and believe that there was but one God, and him alone, without any other, sincerely to worship ; to confess one Christ G8 DUBLIN DURING for an only Saviour and Bedeemer, and to trust in none other man's prayers, merits, nor yet de- servings, but in his alone for salvation. I treated at large both of the heavenly and the political state of the Christian Church; and helpers I found none among my prebendaries and clergy, but ad- versaries a great number. I preached the gospel of the knowledge and right invocation of God. But when I once sought to destroy the idolatries and dissolve the hypocrites' yokes, then followed angers, slanders, and in the end slaughters of men," His labors in Ireland were of short dura- tion, for on the death of Edward and accession of Mary he had to leave the kingdom ; but he came back to England in Elizabeth's reign and joined the Puritans. Bale had studied at Cam- bridge, was a man of great learning, and the author of numerous works on theology and other subjects. He has been censured for his vekeni- ence ; and, in straightforward earnestness of purpose and endeavor, his habits presented a wide contrast to those of Brown ; but he was not, as his censurers would have us to believe, more violent than Luther, Knox, and other leaders in the assault on Bomanism in the sixteenth century. We may safely assume that the relative position of Popery and evangelism in Ireland would be far different from what it is, if, instead of indulg- ing in lukewarmness, time-serving, and self-seek- ing, the parties professing the gospel had always cherished self-sacrificing earnestness like that of Bale, without his faults — faults probably more THE BRITISH REFORMATION. 69 characteristic of the age than of the man. Law- rence Huinfryd, dean of Winchester in 1550, no mean authority in the case, wrote of him : — " Plurima Lutherus patefccit ; Platina multa : Quredani Vergerius ; cuncta Baloeus habet ;" which Harris translates, with more of rhyme than elegance, yet not without some spirit : — " Platina hath much unveiled ; but Luther more ; Vergerius many things ; but Bale hath tore Away the mask that pope and Popery wore." The reader, it is hoped, requires no apology for this notice of such a man, though he was con- nected with Dublin only by two circumstances — his consecration there, as before stated, and his escape in a sailor's dress, on board a vessel there, when he fled from Kilkenny to the continent in peril of his life, in consequence of Popery again coming into power. We have spoken of Archbishop Brown with somewhat reserved approval. We think it would have been better for himself, for the truth, for Dublin, and for Ireland, if he had possessed more moral courage ; but we have intimated no doubt of his honest dissent from Rome. Ware tran- scribes a sermon which he, Brown, preached in Christ Church, perhaps on the day when the Eng- lish liturgy was first used. Part of it has been thought somewhat prophetic of the course of the Jesuits, then just coming on the stage of Europe. His text was Psalm cxix. 18, " Open thou mine eyes, that I may behold wondrous things out of thy law." After applauding the translation of 70 DUBLIN DURING the Scriptures into the vulgar tongue, eulogizing the government, and exposing the folly and sin of worshipping and trusting images, he proceeds : 11 But there are a new fraternity of late sprung up, who call themselves Jesuits, which will de- ceive many, who are much after the Scribes' and Pharisees' manner amongst the Jews. They shall strive to abolish the truth, and shall come very near to do it ; for these sorts will turn themselves into several forms : with the Heathen, an Hea- thenist ; with Atheists, an Atheist ; with the Jews, a Jew; and with the Reformers, a Re- formade : purposely to know your intentions, your minds, your hearts, your inclinations, and thereby bring you at last to be like 'the fool that said in his heart there was no God. These shall spread over the whole world, shall be admitted to the councils of princes, and they never the wiser ; charming of them, yea, making your princes re- veal their hearts and the secrets therein unto them, and yet they not perceive it, which will happen from falling from the law of Grod, by neg- lect of fulfilling of the law of Grod, and by wink- ing at their sins ; yet, in the end, Grod, to justify his law, shall suddenly cut off this society, even by the hands of those who have most succored them and made use of them, so that at the end they shall become odious to all nations : they shall be worse than Jews, having no resting-place upon the earth, and then shall a Jew have more favor than a Jesuit/' Brown could hardly have described the history of the Jesuits, during the latter half of the eighteenth century, more cor- THE BRITISH REFORMATION. W rectly, had lie foreseen what then occurred in their expulsion from every Roman Catholic coun- try in Europe, and the suppression of the order by a bull from Pope G-anganelli in 1773. But Brown's vision of the future seems not to have embraced the subsequent revival and reestablish- nient of the brotherhood within the last fifty years, and the ascendency it is now seeking to acquire over the affairs of these countries, of Europe at. large, and of America. ^ Mary, on coming to the throne in 1553, gave no token of resorting to those measure for exter- minating Protestantism which not long afterwards struck terror into England's heart. The lords justices and privy council, in Dublin, issued a proclamation, making it lawful to attend the mass, but leaving all persons free to act as they chose in the matter. Afterwards, the Roman Catholic religion and the pope's supremacy were again es- tablished. Dowdal was recalled to Armagh and reinvested with the primacy. Brown of Dublin and four other prelates were removed from their sees, because they were married men. Bale, of Ossory, as before named, had to flee for his life. All the other bishops, however, were continued in their sees. Indeed, the whole affair passed off most quietly, so little hold had Protestant princi- ples taken of the population. Persecution was scarcely heard of in Ireland, because there was little to persecute. This induced many of the English Protestants to cross over and reside where they would be free from the deadly violence to which they were exposed in their own land. 7*2 DUBLIN DURING "Among others, John Hervey, Abel Ellis, John Edmonds, and Henry Hough, all Christian men, transported their effects to Dublin, and became citizens thereof; one Thomas Jones, a Welsh- man, and a Protestant priest, privately officiating among thein." This was in 1554. But in a year or two the queen's government began to cast their eye upon the refugees, and an act " for re- viving three [English] statutes, made for the punishment of heresies/' was passed in a Dublin parliament. Perhaps it was deemed enough for the present to have these statutes held up in ter- rorem, for nothing appears to have been done towards putting them in force. However, it would have been anomalous if Protestants had continued to enjoy life and liberty where popery was in strength. Within two months of the queen's death, namely, in October, 1558, the storm which had broken with desolat- ing fury upon all that was dear to truth and god- liness in England, began to move westward, and threatened to make havoc of the same in Ireland. Barely has the historian had to record a more singular deliverance than in the case now referred to. It is; perhaps, generally known, but must not be omitted here. The reader shall have the account as given by Sir James Ware's son : " Queen Mary, towards the end of her reign, this year granted a commission for to call the Protestants in question here in Ireland, as well as they had done in England; and to execute the same with greater force, she nominated Dr. Cole, sometime dean of St. Paul's in London, one of THE BRITISH REFORMATION. 73 the commissioners ; and so sent the commission by this said doctor. And in his journey coming to Chester, the mayor of that city, hearing that her majesty was sending commissioners into Ire- land, and he being a churchman, waited on the doc- tor, who in his discourse with the mayor took out of his cloak-bag a leather box, and said unto him, 1 Here is a commission that shall lash the heretics of Ireland,' calling the Protestants by that title. The good woman of the house being well affected to the Protestants and to that religion, and also having a brother, named John Edmonds, a Pro- testant and a citizen in Dublin, was much trou- bled at the Doctor's words. But she, waiting her convenient time, whilst the mayor took his leave of the doctor, and the doctor was complimenting him clown the stairs, opened the box and took the commission out, and placed in lieu thereof a pack of cards, with the knave of clubs faced upper- most, and wrapt them up. The doctor coming up to his chamber, suspecting nothing of what had been done, put up his box as formerly. The next day, going to the water-side, wind and wea- ther serving him, he sailed towards Ireland, and landed on the 17th of October, 1558, at Dublin. Then coming to the castle, the Lord Fitz- Walter being at this time lord deputy, sent for the doc- tor to come before him and the privy council, who coming in, after he had made a speech relating upon what account he came on, presented the box to the lord deputy, who causing it to be opened that the secretary might read the commission, there appeared nothing save a pack of cards, with 74 DUBLIN DURING the knave of clubs uppermost; which not only startled the lord deputy and the council, but the doctor, who assured them he had a commission, but knew not how it was gone. Then the lord deputy made answer, * Let us have another com- mission, and we will shuffle the cards in the mean- while/ The doctor, being troubled in his mind, went away, and returned into England, and com- ing to the court obtained another commission : but staying' for a wind at the water-side, news came to him that the queen was dead. Thus," adds Ware, " G-od preserved the Protestants in Ireland from the persecution intended." As authorities for this extraordinary narrative, the writer of it mentions the Earl of Cork's " Me- morials," Sir James Ware, and the two Primates Usher. He adds, that when Lord Fitz-Walter went to England after Elizabeth's accession, the deputy related the circumstances to her majesty, which so delighted the queen that she " sent for the good woman named Elizabeth Edmonds, by her husband Mattershed, and gave her a pension of forty pounds per annum durante vita, for sav- ing her Protestant subjects of Ireland." The new queen, Elizabeth, was proclaimed in Christ Church, Dublin, before the end of Novem- ber, with the usual ceremonies. On the 27th of August following, Thomas, Earl of Sussex, landed at Dalkey, which seems to have been then a port of more importance than at present. He lay that night at Sir John Travers's house at Monktown. On the morrow, being Sunday, he came to Dub- lin, and was met by the mayor and aldermen on THE BRITISH REFORMATION. 75 Stephen's green, when he, the lord deputy, took the mayor by the hand, asked the aldermen how they did, and said, " You be all happy, my mas- ters, in a gracious queen. " That night he lay at one Mr. Peter Forth' s house, because the house at Kilmainham, the usual residence of the de- puty, once belongiDg to the Knights Templars, had been damaged by a great tempest the year before, and was not yet repaired. The next morning he rode to St. Patrick's, and then to St. Sepulchre's, where he kept his court. On the 30th he attended worship in Christ Church, where Sir Nicholas Darly sang the litany in Eng- lish, after which the lord deputy took his oath of office. These ceremonies being ended, his lord- ship rode back to St. Sepulchre's, inviting the mayor and aldermen to dine with him. Soon after, the use of the mass-service was forbidden by proclamation. Orders came to the dean of Christ Church to remove from the cathedral all popish relics and images, and to paint and whiten it anew, putting sentences of Scripture upon the walls instead of pictures. This work was begun May 23d, 1559. In the same year the Arch- bishop of York sent over two large Bibles in Eng- lish, one for each of the cathedrals, Christ Church and St. Patrick's. They were put up in the choir, and crowds of people nocked to see and read for themselves the sacred Scriptures of truth. So great was the demand thus created for Bibles, that John Dale, a Dublin bookseller, imported and sold for the London publishers not fewer 76 DUBLIN DURING than seven thousand copies in the two years end- ing- with 1566. The lord deputy haying visited England to consult the court how he should manage re- specting the affairs of the Church, returned in 1560,. with instructions to call an assembly of the clergy, and to proceed with the establishment of the Protestant religion in Ireland. The convocation met. Some of the ecclesiastics were much anger- ed, and one of them, William Walsh, bishop of Meath, having preached against the prayer-book, was, by the queen's commands, deposed and put in prison. By an act of parliament, the eccle- siastical jurisdiction was restored to the crown, and a new oath of supremacy appointed : the use of the common prayer was enforced, and all sub- jects were obliged to attend the service of the Church. English not being then the spoken lan- guage of the country, except in Dublin and a few other principal towns, it was ordered that where the people did not understand English, the ser- vice should be performed in Latin I The reason of this arrangement is not explained : possibly it may have been from a wish to meet the prejudices of Romanists, or from a fear of countenancing the Irish language, of which the English author- ities seem generally to have had an instinctive dread. Long before Elizabeth's time, great improve- ments had taken place in the house-building and general plan of Dublin. The structures of wattles plastered with clay had generally given THE BRITISH REFORMATION. ^77 place to those of " cage-work " — a framework of timber having the compartments filled up with brick or with wattles plastered, such as are yet to be seen in Chester and some other old English towns. Shingles, tiles, and slates, were taking the place of sedge and straw for roofing j although there were some thatched roofs in the city in the time of Charles I. One of the " cage" houses remained in Cooke street till about the middle of the last century : it was taken down on the 27th of July, 1745. "On an oak beam," says White- law, " carried over the door the whole length of the said house, was the following inscription cut in large capitals and a fair Roman character, no- thing damaged by time in the space of one hun- dred and sixty-five years, except in one part where an upright piece of timber, being morticed into it, had received the drip, and was somewhat rotted : — qui fecisti coelum et terram bene- DIC DOMUM ISTAM, QUAM JOHANNES LUTREL ET JOHANA NEI CONSTRUI FECERTJNT, A. D. 1580, ET ANNO REGNI REGINiE ELIZABETHS 22. ' TllOU who madest the heavens and the earth bless this house, which John Lutrel and Joan — caused to be built in the year of our Lord 1580, and in the twenty-second year of the reign of Queen Eliza- beth/ " Many other houses of the same sort were to be seen in the city and suburbs when this author wrote, namely, in 1766; but the one he considered to be the oldest and most remarkable was in Skinner's row, near the Tholsel : it had been called " the Cairbre," and was described as 78 DUBLIN DURING having been the residence of the lord-deputy Kildare, in 1532. The " Tholsel," from toll-stall, or place where tolls were paid, above named as existing in 1766, was the successor of a previous one in Eliza- beth's time, which also stood where now Nicholas street joins Christ Church Place, lately Skinner How : it occupied the angle formed by the junction of the two, having its front towards the cathedral. "Newgate," the common jail, was a building of a square form, having a tower at each corner : it was one of the city gates, and stood in what was then called Newgate street, now Corn market, between New Row and High street. The Dublin "Bridewell" of Elizabeth's day was about half- way on the road from the city to where the col- lege was built. The "Hospital" was on the river-side, near where Fleet street now is. The " Inns" of that time were followed in their site first by an " Infirmary," and then by the present " Four Courts." The " Castle" was to have been built as a " palace" in addition to a fortress, but means had ' not been forthcoming for the purpose, and the representatives of the sovereign held their court at Thomas Court, or at St. Sepulchre's, the re- sidence of the archbishop, or in the house of the Knights Templars at Kilmainham. Elizabeth, in the third year of her reign, 1560, commanded the lord lieutenant and council " to repair and enlarge the castle of Dublin, for the reception of the chief governors." The particulars of what was THE BRITISH REFORMATION. 79 done in obedience to this order are not given us, but we are told that in 1567 the lord-deputy, Sir Heury Sidney, " repaired and beautified' ' it. Whatever the improvements were, they seem to have been neither adequate nor very durable, for within some seventy years afterwards it was in a ruinous condition, and Archbishop Laud wrote to the lord-deputy Wentworth to " vindicate to God's service" St. Andrew's church, which had been used by his lordship as a stable. The " walls" of the city, in Elizabeth's reign, were in extent nearly as described in our last section, excepting that they now enclosed the space which then lay between them and the river. The' principal streets within them were Castle street, Skinner How, High street, Newgate street, St. Nicholas street, St. Werburgh's street, Back lane, Cooke street, Bridge street, Winetavern street, and Fish-shamble street. Merchant's Quay was the place where vessels landed their cargoes, and mer- chants carried on their business in imports and ex- ports. Wood Quay, also, then existed. Between these two quays, at the foot of Winetavern street, stood the Custom House, called the " Crane." Be- yond the walls on the south of the Liffey, were St. Andrew's, St. Michael-le-Pole's, St. Peter's, St. Stephen's, St. Bride's, and St. Catharine's churches, and St. Patrick's Cathedral ; with Tho- mas street, New Row, Francis street, Patrick street, Bride street, and Sheep street, more or less built, while indistinct rudiments showed themselves of the Coombe, New street, Kevin street, George's lane, and Dame street. A lodgment of water, 80 DUBLIN DURING called the City Ditch, ran from what is now Ex- change court, to the foot of Nicholas street, having a bridge over it at Pole's gate, at the foot of "Werburgh's street. The other gates were St. Nicholas's at the foot of St. Nicholas street, New- gate, Orinond gate, whence we now have '•'Worm- wood" gate at the foot of New Row, Bridge gate opening from Bridge street to the Bridge, and Dame's gate leading into Dame street. The last was the principal entrance to the city, and was " armed" with a portcullis. As part of the city wall at the river end of Fish-shamble street, stood Finn's or rather Fynn's Castle, also called Proute- fort's, a place of some strength, thought to have been built about the middle of the sixteenth cen- tury, and to have been named from its owner. Parliament street and Essex street did not exist in Elizabeth's time : they, with Essex gate, were formed about 1672, when the Earl of Essex was lord lieutenant. Their place was, at the period we are describing, occupied by a creek, or small harbor for boats, which ran up from the river to near the head of Dame street. Here Archbishop Allen embarked when he fled from Fitzgerald in 1535, but, being driven on shore at Clontarf, he was discovered and put to death by the rebels. Along where we have Sycamore alley, Temple bar, Fleet street, and Poolbeg street, was covered with water at every rise of the tide. A village, called " Hoggins," occupied part of the space between George's lane and what is now Dawson street, probably about our Grafton street, and the village u Green" extended to the river : the name THE BRITISH REFORMATION. 81 is thought to have come from the mnmciy which stood there, " Ogh," in Irish signifying a " vir- gin." " Stephen's green" then existed, so called from the church of St. Stephen, which stood near it, but there was no road from it to Hoggin's green except through George's lane. Almost all the range beyond New Row, Thomas street, Francis street, Patrick's street, Sheep street, and Dame street, was considered " the country." One bridge crossed the Liffey, namely, at the foot of Bridge street. There was also the " Ford" of St. Mary's Abbey, perhaps where Essex bridge has been since built. On the north side of the river were the Abbey and its lands, St. Michan's church, the Inns, and Ostmantown ; with Church- street, Mary's lane, and Pill lane. The Liffey, more or. less, flowed over what is Ormoncl Quay, Upper and Lower, and the adjoining parts. " Grood Queen Bess" made herself highly popu- lar with the Dublin people, by the grant of three public clocks, which were put up, one at the Castle, a second at the Tholsel, and the other at St. Patrick's Cathedral. She also raised the value of the coin, so that the Dublin " shilling" passed for " nine-pence" in England. A writer of this period tells us that " the hos- pitalitie of the maior and sherriffes for the year being is so large and bountifull, that surelie very few such officers under the crowne of England keep so great a port, none I am sure greater. The maior, over the number of officers that take their dailie repast at his table, keepeth for his yeare in a manner open house. And, albeit, in terme time $2 DUBLIN DURING Lis house is frequented as well of the nobilitie as of other potentates of great calling ; yet his ordi- narie is so good, that a verie few set feasts are provided for them. They that spend least in their inaioraltie, (as those of credit, yea, and such as hare the office have informed me,) make an ordi- nate account of five hundred pounds for their viand and diet that year : which is no small summe to be bestowed in housekeeping, namelie where vittels are so good cheape, and the presents of friends diverse and sundrie." It will, however, be seen that by the end of the queen's reign "vit- tels" had ceased to be " so good cheape," and that the chief magistrate's hospitalities must have de- clined, or that his expenditure thereon must have greatly increased. We have now to record the establishment of the Dublin University, Elizabeth's great boon to Ireland. It has been noticed that an institution of the kind was commenced, and existed for some time languishingly, at an earlier period, but at length died away. In 1568, a Dublin parliament pro- jected another, to be supported by voluntary con- tributions j and the lord deputy, with other wealthy persons, promised liberal assistance. Representa- tions were forwarded to London in order to obtain the sanction of the crown. Many delays and difficulties occurred to prevent this design from being carried into effect as quickly as it deserved. In 1590, it was renewed with greater vigor. St. Patrick's Cathedral had been occupied for the former university, and it was proposed to appro- THE BRITISH REFORMATION. 83 priate that edifice for the one now contemplated, but the archbishop, Loftus, would not give his •consent, though zealous for the undertaking. However, accompanied by the lord chancellor and clergy, he met the mayor, aldermen, and commons, at the Tholsel, and after setting forth the advan- tages of having a seat of learning in the city, intimated that her majesty would be highly pleased if they would give the decayed monastery of All-Hallows, which Henry VIII., her father, had made over to the city, as a site for the erection. The mayor and corporation at once acquiesced. Applications for aid were made to the country, and from Cork, G-alway, and other places, about £2000, equal to £14;000 now, was received to- wards the expenses of building, etc. The foun- dation-stone was laid by the mayor, on the loth of March, 1591. The queen's charter of incor- poration bears date March the 30th, 1592 ; and in January, 1593, the college was opened. It was based on liberal principles, much more so than is Oxford or even Cambridge, all Protestants, Conformists, or others, being eligible for its pro- vostship and fellowships, as well as admissible to its advantages for education; but, in less than half a century from its beginning, Archbishop Laud greatly modified its constitution. Arch- bishop Loftus was the first provost, and the first three fellows were William Daniel and two Pres- byterians from Scotland, who had been sent over by James VI. to watch his interests, and employed themselves as schoolmasters in the city. The first scholars, or students, were Abel Walsh, James 84 DUBLIN DURING Usher, and James Lee. To some of the parties connected with the university iu its earliest days, we must devote a few sentences. The name best known among them is that of James Usher — a name that reflects honor upon his country and his age. He was born in Dublin on January the 8th, 1580 : his father was one of the six clerks in chancery; his uncle, Henry Usher, was Archbishop of Armagh. The child Jauies learned to read from two aunts who had been blind from their birth, but taught him the Bible from their recollection of it on its being read to them : he ever called it the " best of books." He was placed, for acquiring the elements of learning, under the care of Fullarton and Hamilton, the two Scottish schoolmasters, above referred to as made fellows of the college. James Usher entered college when only thirteen years old : Hamilton was his tutor there. In his nineteenth year, while yet a student, he accepted a challenge thrown out by Fitz-Symoncls, a Jesuit, to a public disputation on the Protestant faith. The Jesuit reckoned on an easy triumph, but the stripling vanquished the giant. After a second conference, the latter de- clined a third. On this Usher wrote to him : the Jesuit sent no reply. He afterwards said of the discussion, " There came to me once a youth of about eighteen years of age, of a ripe wit, when scarce, as you would think, gone through his course of philosophy, or got out of his childhood, yet ready to dispute on the most abstruse points of divinity." The same Jesuit called Usher u Acatholicorum doctissimas ,> — the " most learned THE BRITISH REFORMATION. " 85 of the not-Catholics." In 1601, he was ordained by his uncle, the primate, and preached a series of controversial sermons in Christ Church with great success. What he afterwards became is known to the world. William Daniel, one of the first fellows of the university, was the first or second who took there the degree of doctor in divinity. He was conse- crated Archbishop of Tuani in 1609. He was an eminent scholar, and translated the New Tes- tament out of Greek into the Irish language; which work was printed in quarto, and dedicated to King James I. It was reprinted in 1681, at the expense of the Honorable Robert Boyle. Daniel also translated the English Common Prayer into Irish. This was printed in 1608, and dedicated to the lord deputy, Sir Arthur Chichester. Archbishop Loftus took the honorary title of "provost" to the college at its opening, in order to countenance the undertaking, but shortly re- signed the oifice, and arranged that Walter Tra- vers, $ Puritan, who had been joint-fellow with himself in Trinity College, Cambridge, should succeed him. Travers was afternoon preacher at the Temple church, London, where Hooker, author of the Ecclesiastical Polity, preached in the morn- ing. The two ministers were strongly at variance on doctrinal and ecclesiastical matters : the same pulpit, in one part of the day, was antagonist to itself in the other. Hooker took deep umbrage, and failing to carry the mind of the congregation with him, appealed to a higher authority, Whit- 86 DUBLIN DURING gift, the Archbishop of Canterbury, who, says Thomas Fuller in his Church History, a silenced Travers from preaching in the Temple or any- where else. It was laid to his charge : — 1. That he was no lawful ordained minister of the Church of England. 2. That he preached here without license. 3. That he had broken the order made in the seventh year of her majesty's reign, that erroneous doctrine, if it came to be publicly taught, should not be publicly refuted, but that notice thereof should be given to the ordinary, to hear and determine such causes, to prevent public disturbance." Hearing of what had thus occurred in London, Loftus wrote to Travers, inviting him to the provostship of the Dublin college. Travers acceded, and remained in that office till ill-health obliged him to resign in 1601, when he returned to England. Fuller gives him the highest cha- racter. " Sometimes," he writes, " he did preach; rather when he dared than when he would : de- barred from all cure of souls for his nonconform- ity." Usher, who had studied under him, held him in high veneration, and, when Travers .was in poverty for conscience' sake, offered him money; but Travers " returned a thankful refusal thereof." He "bequeathed all his books of oriental lan- guages, (wherein he was exquisite,) and plate worth fifty pounds, to Sion College in London. ! if this good man had had a hand to his head, or rather a purse to his hand, what charita- ble works would he have left behind him ! But," continues Fuller, in concluding a pretty full ac- count of him, "in pursuance of his memory, I THE BRITISH REFORMATION. 87 have entrenched too much on the modern times. Only this I will add, perchance the reader will be angry with me for saying thus much ; and I am almost angry with myself for saying no more of so worthy a divine." The University, in its charter of incorporation, was styled Collegium Sanctce et Individual Trini- tatis Juxta Dublin a Sercnissimd Regind Eliza- betkd Fandatum. The " Juxta" is inappropriate to describe its position now, its situation being in one of the greatest thoroughfares of the city. Its first buildings formed a square, the principal of them being on the north side. Within a few years of its commencement, its revenues failed in consequence of a rebellion in the country, and applications had to be made to the government for funds to prevent its being finally closed. The necessary aid was granted, and this university is at present second to neither Oxford nor Cam- bridge in the ability and zeal of its professors, its general regulations, or the conduct of the resident students. But " Trinity/' in its beginning, had a very humble form compared with the noble establishment of our own day, including its hand- some frontage, its magnificent library and its chaj)el, its examination-hall, its dining-hall, its printing-office, its squares, its spacious park for recreation, its botanic garden on the east, and its observatory on the west of the metropolis it adorns. The rebellion which imperilled the infant col- lege was only one of a succession which kept the country in ferment to nearly the close of Eliza- 88 DUBLIN DURING BRITISH REFORMATION. belli' s reign, when the English power came to be generally acknowledged. Of the distress occa- sioned by these wars, some opinion may be formed by the following account of the prices at which provisions were sold in Dublin in the year 1602, signed by John Tirrel, the mayor. Wheat had risen from 36s. the quarter to 180s.; barley-malt from 10s. the barrel to 43s. ; oatmeal from 5s. the barrel to 22s. ; peas from 5s.' the peck to 40s. ) oats from 3s. 4cZ. the barrel to 20s. ; beef from 26s. 8cZ. the carcase to £8 ; mutton from 3s. the carcase to 26s. ) veal from 10s. the carcase to 29s. ; a lamb from Is. to 6s. ; a pork from 8s. to 30s. If we multiply these prices by seven, to give their equivalents in our own money, the sums almost exceed belief, and show that if money were not in proportion much more plenti- ful than it is with us, the cost of what are con- sidered necessaries must at that period have been, with most persons, tantamount to a prohi- bition of them. DUBLIN UNDER JAMES I. AND CHARLES I. 89 SECTION IV. DUBLIN UNDER JAMES I. AND CHARLES I. Allusion has already been made to the fre- quent occurrence of pestilence in Dublin. In the year 1575, a plague broke out on the 7th of June, and continued till the 17th of October, carrying off at least three thousand persons. The city is described as having been then so depopu- lated, by deaths or desertions, that grass grew in the streets and about the ohurch-cloors. The niaj'or and sheriffs held their court at Glasman- ogue, and the lord deputy resided at Drogheda. In 1604, the same calamity began in October and continued till September, 1605. It broke out again the next year, and continued till the year following. Yet the annals record that in the year 1610 the inhabitants of the city and suburbs amounted to twenty thousand. The density with which the people were crowded together, the want of sewerage, and, equally, of cleanliness and ventilation, with the malaria from the swamps bordering on the river and elsewhere near the city, must have almost compelled disease in some of its worst forms to hold the place as its den and throne. Notwithstanding all that Elizabeth's govern- 90 DUBLIN UNDER JAMES I. ment had clone to make Ireland Protestant, little, yery little, had been effected. The poet Spenser gives an appalling account of what he had ob- served to be the state of both clergy and laity in the country, and he places in humiliating contrast the earnestness of the Roman priesthood and the supineness and selfishness of what he calls " the ministers of the gospel." Lord Bacon thought much for Ireland, and in 1601 wrote to Cecil, secretary of state, urging " some course of advancing religion indeed, where the people is capable thereof; as the sending over some good preachers, especially of that sort which are vehement and zealous preachers, and not scholastic, to be resident in principal towns, en- dowing them with some stipend out of her ma- jesty's revenues, as her majesty hath most religiously and graciously done in Lancashire; and the re-continuing and replenishing the college begun in Dublin, the placing of good men to be bishops in the sees there, and the taking care of the versions of Bibles, and catechisms, and other books of instruction in the Irish language ; and the like religious courses, both for the honor of God, and for the avoiding of scandal and unsatis- faction here, by the show of toleration in religion in some parts there." Little or no notice appears to have been taken of Bacon's advice. It may be hoped that Dublin itself was not so destitute of faithful Christian ministrations in the beginning of the seventeenth century as Spenser's statements show too many portions of the island to have been. Travers, who remained provost of AND CHARLES I. 91 the college till 1601, must have had some influ- ence for the truth of the gospel in the city. Usher, also, had been catechist-reader in the col- lege, and, about 1602, was appointed afternoon preacher in Christ Church, where the court at- tended. Having mentioned Usher's connection with the college, we may add that the English army, when they had defeated the Spaniards and disaffected Irish in the south of the country, raised among themselves the sum of £1800 to furnish a library for the Dublin University, and placed it in the hands of " Dr. Challoner and Mr. James Usher/' to be expended in the purchase of books for the purpose. The military have seldom perhaps been thus forward in such good works ; but, as we shall see, this was not the last instance of the college library deriving aid from the bountiful- ness of the English soldiery. Under the date of 1605, Whitelaw's " History of Dublin" records, " The Jesuits and seminary priests busied themselves greatly in dissuading the people from resorting to Divine service ac- cording to the Act of Uniformity, and the king's proclamation thereon grounded. The lord deputy (Chichester) and council convened before them the aldermen and some of the principal citizens, and endeavored by persuasions and lenity to draw them to their duty. They also exemplified under the great seal, and published the Statute of Uni- formity of the 2d of Elizabeth, in regard there was found to be some material difference between the original record and the printed copies, that 92 DUBLIN UNDER JAMES I. none might pretend ignorance of the original record, and added thereto .the king's injunction for the observance of the said statute. But these gentle methods failing to have any effect, sixteen of the most eminent men of the city were con- vened into the court of the " Castle Chamber" — answering to the " Star Chamber" in England — " of whom nine of the chief were censured, and six of the aldermen fined each £100, and the other three £50 a-piece ; and they were all com- mitted prisoners to the Castle during the pleasure of the court ; and it was ordered that none of the citizens should bear office till they conformed. The week following, the rest were censured in the same manner, except alderman Archer, who conformed. Their fines were allotted to the re- pairs of such churches as had been damaged by an accidental blowing up of gunpowder in 1596, to the relieving poor scholars in the college, and other charitable uses. This proceeding brought many to an outward conformity." The " blowing up of the gunpowder" mentioned, was an ex- plosion of 144 barrels which had been landed at Wood Quay, and stored in Winetavern street for the use of the Castle. Nearly fifty houses were burned, and about four hundred lives lost by this~~ accident. The measures adopted to enforce Protestantism, provoked resistance to the government on the part of the Romanists. In 1607, a conspiracy was formed between the Earls of Tyrone and Tyrconnel, with other leading persons, to seize the castle, cut off the lord deputy and the coun- AND CnARLES I. 93 cil, dissolve the state, and set up a new authority. A Roman Catholic who had been invited to join, but who shrank from the design, dropped a letter in the Council Chamber, addressed to Sir William Usher, clerk of the council, giving the particulars of the plan as they had been made known to him. The conspirators were apprised that they had been betrayed, and fled before they could be ap- prehended ; but their estates were confiscated. After an interval of twenty-seven years, a par- liament was once more called in 1613. The two parties disagreed on the choice of a speaker, and the Romanists withdrew. Another met the year after ; and a convocation of the clergy was held which adopted a code of " articles" as the Con- fession of the Irish Church. This formulary of faith was prepared by Usher : it was essentially Puritanic, being rigidly Calvinistic in doctrine, and liberal in matters ritual and eccesiastical. It declared the pope to be the Man of Sin • taught that Lent is of merely political, not religious ob- ligation ; and affirmed that the Lord's-day is to be wholly devoted to the service of God. It set forth that the catholic or invisible Church in- cludes all the faithful on earth and in heaven ; but that " particular and visible Churches (con- sisting of those who make profession of the faith of Christ, and live under the outward means of salvation) be many in number ; wherein the more or less sincerely according to Christ's institution, the word of God is taught, the sacraments are duly administered, and the authority of the keys is used-, the more or less pure are such churches 94 DUBLIN UNDER JAMES I. to be accounted." It makes no reference to the consecration of prelates, as if, in Colly er's judg- ment, done on purpose to avoid the distinction between the episcopal order and that of presby- ters; and Neal thinks it was u contrived to com- promise the difference between the Church and the Puritans :" which effect, he says, it had till 1634, wheD, by the influence of Archbishop Laud and the Earl of Strafford, these articles were set aside, and others received in their stead. It was feared that Usher would incur the king's dis- pleasure by the tenor of these articles, and at- tempts were not wanting to prejudice James against him for the leading part he took in the adoption of a confession by the Irish Church, which included much that was contrary to the king's principles. " But Usher," writes Leland, " had the address to guard against the insinua- tions of his enemies; and James was so just to his piety and erudition, that he soon after pro- moted him to the see of Meath." A notice of the neighborhood of Dublin about this period occurs incidentally in an account of the state of Ulster, given when James was par- celling out six counties of it which were at his disposal in consequence of confiscations. " Sir Toby Caufield's people are driven every night to lay up all his cattle, as it were in ward ; and do he and his what they can, the woolfe and the wood-kernac" — a marauder living in the wood — "within culiver shot of his fort, have oftentimes a share." " Even in the English pale," he adds, " Sir John King and Sir Henry Harrington, AND CHARLES I. 95 within half a mile of Dublin, do the like, for these forenained enemies do every night survey the 'fields to the very walls of Dublin." A proclamation for banishing the Roman Ca- tholic regular clergy was issued in October, 1617. But, in five years afterwards, that party opened a university in Back Lane, for the education of persons of their own persuasion : Whitelaw, in- deed, dates this establishment later. When Lord Falkland came over as lord deputy, Usher preached before him in Christ Church, and the Roinan Catholics took umbrage at the sermon as intended to encourage persecution against them : to satisfy them, he delivered an explanatory discourse, which, however, it is likely did not give them the satisfaction desired. In November following, " several popish magistrates, who had refused the oath of supremacy, contrary to the statute of 2 Eliz. cap. 1, were censured in the Star Chamber, when Bishop Usher made a speech about the law- fulness of the oath/'" And, in two months more, there was " issued a proclamation requiring the popish clergy, regular and secular, to depart the kingdom within forty days, and forbidding all in- tercourse with them after that time/' Notwithstanding all that could be done to sup- press them, the lord deputy found himself unable to keep the disaffected in check. They were aware that the revenue of the country fell seriously short of the expenditure, and that the authorities had not power at command to control them. The troubled state of England on Charles's accession and assumption of arbitrary power, gave yet more 96 DUBLIN UNDER JAMES I. confidence to the Romanist hierarchy and laity. They judged it a favorable juncture for obtaining a toleration for their religion; and it was not for Charles, in his circumstances, to slight the appli- cations of a party so important. Its leaders were admitted to a conference on the subject with the authorities in Dublin. They intimated that for a partial toleration they would give a voluntary contribution for supporting the army. "A grand meeting of the principal nobility and gentry, in which the popish party was by far the more numerous*, assembled in the Castle of Dublin : they offered large contributions to purchase se- curity to their lands and a suspension of the penal statutes. Lord Falkland, far from discouraging their overtures, advised them to send agents to England, to make a tender of their dutiful ser- vices to the king, and to submit the grievances and inconveniences to which they were exposed, to his gracious consideration/* These movements alarmed the Protestants. Usher and eleven other prelates met in Dublin, and entered a strong pro- test against the measure. This protest was read from the Dublin pulpits, and Usher was requested to explain the grounds of it in a speech before the council for the conviction of the parties it concerned; and his address, though it failed of its purpose, was considered worthy of being sent over to the king, who highly approved of it. The Irish agents, however, were successful at the English court. It was greatly in their favor that money and strength were at the time of greater value to Charles, if they were not always AND CHARLES I. 97 nearer to his heart, than Protestant orthodoxy. They offered his majesty a hundred and twenty thousand pounds, payable in quarterly instal- ments, on condition of receiving in return certain royal "graces," which were to be affirmed by par- liament. Several of these " graces," it is to be observed, affected the property and trade of the country, and were by all parties reckoned just and beneficial. Respecting ecclesiastical matters, it was agreed that bishops and patentees of dis- solvecTnionasteries should be equally subject to the state burdens with other persons ; and, " as the popish recusants had clamored against the severe demands of the established clergy, it was provided that all unlawful exactions taken by the clergy be reformed and regulated j and the rigor," writes Leland, " with which their (the clergy's) demands had been enforced, may be gathered from the injunction annexed : ' That no extra- ordinary warrants of assistance, touching clandes- tine marriages, christenings, or burials, or any contumacies pretended against ecclesiastical juris- diction, are to be issued or executed by any chief governor; nor are the clergy to be permitted to keep any private prisons of their own for these causes, but delinquents in that kind are hence- forth to be committed to the king's public jails and by the king's officers.' " The success of the Irish deputies with Charles well nigh intoxicated the " recusants," as the Roman Catholics were now called. Their worship was openly celebrated in due form and with great pomp. Parochial churches were seized for their 4 98 DUBLIN UNDER JAMES I. service. Their ecclesiastical jurisdiction was strictly administered. JSew friaries and nun- neries were erected. Priests from foreign semi- naries swarmed into the country and its metro- polis, sworn to hatred against England and to allegiance to the pope, under the direction of the Propaganda Fide, then lately established. These swellings of Romanism stirred the fears and the zeal of Protestants. Accustomed to look to the government as their stay, instead of being them- selves valiant for the truth in the use of truth's own weapons, and relying upon God whose the truth and its triumphs are, they obtained a pro- clamation from the government, forbidding the exercise of the Roman Catholic worship. The Roman Catholics despised the proclamation, and became yet more bold, conscious of their superi- ority in the kind of strength on which Protestant- ism was then made to rest as its safeguard. They complained that their agents in England had ex- ceeded their powers in engaging so large a con- tribution to the king, and that the country was not able to bear the impost. Falkland was re- called, and Viscount Ely, the lord chancellor, and the Earl of Cork, lord high treasurer, were sworn lords justices. . They proceeded forthwith to exe- cute the laws against " recusants/' and to compel attendance on the established worship. But in- timation came that such measures were not pleas- ing to the king. The Romanists were in conse- quence cheered on. A fraternity of Carmelites red in public, wearing the habit of their order, and celebrated their worship in one of the AND CIIAIILES I. 99 most frequented parts of the city. This was not to be endured. The archbishop and the mayor led a body of troops to their chapel, to disperse the congregation. The congregation, headed by the priests, repelled the assailants : the arch- bishop, the mayor, and the military, had to save themselves by flight. An order now came from London for the seizure of sixteen religious houses for the king's use, and for the transfer of the Eoman Catholic College to the Dublin University. Affairs were in this position when Wentworth, afterwards Earl of Strafford, arrived as lord de- puty in July, 1633. He came, resolved to break d ordered by the Irish house of commons, that 'the proposition made against the excessive wearing of bone lace, and of gold and silver lace, should be referred to the consideration of the committee of grievances, to consider what persons and degrees are fifr to use the same, and how, for to report their opinion thereon to the house/ '■' Not fewer than fifty peers attended the par- liament called by Wentworth, and they, with the members of the lower house, must have added much to the trade and splendor of the city. Some families of distinction had mansions worthy of their rank. Among them was the Earl of Cork's, at the Dame's gate, near the castle, from AND CHARLES I. 105 which the ascent there acquired the name of "Cork Hill." This building was afterwards taken on lease by the government of Charles I., and it was occupied for public purposes early under the common wealth, though by that time it had fallen much into decay. Little, it is to be feared, can be said favorable to the state of Christian piety in Dublin at this period. Dr. Joshua Hoyle occupied the pulpit of St. Werburgh's, where he is said to have preached at ten in the morning and at three in the afternoon. He is described as " the friend of Usher, and the tutor and chamber-fellow of Sir James Ware," " a most zealous preacher and general scholar in all manner of learning." He was a fellow and professor of divinity in the uni- versity. He appeared as one of the witnesses against Laud on his trial, and afterwards was a constantly-attending member of the Westminster Assembly of Divines. Wood, in the "Athense Oxonienses," gives him a high character. He- had studied at Oxford, and died master of Uni- versity College there in 1654. Notwithstanding all the gayety and appearance of prosperity in the metropolis, the elements of strife already adverted to were generating fearful convulsions in the country. Rome, by its bulls, its nuncio, its emissaries, conspired with Charles's self-seeking tyranny and duplicity, to sever it from England and Protestantism together; but the details of organizations and movements direct- ed to this end belong to the history of Ireland rather than of Dublin. The lord deputy's rule 106 DUBLIN UNDER JAMES I. here was of the same tenor with that of his mas- ter : it aggravated discontent in the honest and well-disposed, while it cheered on the revolted. Wentworth returned to England, where he was created Earl of Strafford. He was impeached, attainted, and executed. Sir Christopher Wands- ford was appointed lord deputy, but died sud- denly. Sir William Parsons and Sir John Borlase were sworn lords justices in February, 1641. The insurgents had their schemes laid widely, but with so much secrecy that the authorities were totally unaware of their intentions. They had prepared to possess themselves of Dublin, with its castle, and on the 22nd of October they re- solved to effect their purpose on the evening of the next day. Providentially for the city, its inhabitants, and the government, one Mac Mahon, a leader among the rebels, had disclosed their projects to a man named Owen 0' Connolly, servant to a Protestant gentleman in the north, hoping to engage him with them. This man came up to Dublin in quest of a friend on the 22d, when he met Mac Mahon, and while they were drinking together, the latter divulged to him the plan for the fol- lowing day. Half-intoxicated as he was, 0' Con- nolly stole away and gave information to Sir William Parsons. The man's appearance made Sir William for the moment pay little regard to his statements. He was told to go and obtain further information. But Tub was hardly dismissed when it struck Sir William that what the man had said was more important than it at first seemed AND CHARLES I. 107 to be. He ordered the castle and city to be guarded, and went to his fellow lord justice, Sir John Borlase. The privy council were summoned. 3Iessengers were sent to discover and bring O'Counolly again. He was found with the po- lice, who had taken him in charge for not being able to give an account of himself. By his dis- closures, Mac Mahon, Lord Maguire, and some more, were arrested j but other leaders, hearing of the discovery, saved themselves by instant flight. Most opportunely, Sir Francis Willough- by, governor of Gralway Castle, a privy-councillor and an able soldier, reached Dublin at this critical moment. He found the gates closed and the suburbs in much confusion. Hearing that the lords justices and the privy council were in de- liberation at Sir John Borlase's, on the green leading to the college, he went thither. He told them that in the country through which he passed he observed no signs of disturbance, but that an unusual number of strange horsemen had all night been pouring into the suburbs. He recommend- ed an adjournment to the castle for greater secu- rity. The lords justices and council acted on his suggestions, assigned to him the general defence of the place, and issued a proclamation informing the public of the plot discovered, and exhorting to loyalty and courage in self-defence. The force at the command of the government did not exceed three thousand men, and these were scattered in garrisons and detachments through the country. In Dublin castle were " one thousand five hundred barrels of powder, 108 DUBLIN UNDER JAMES I. . with proportionate match and bullet, arras f5r ten thousand men, and thirty-five pieces of artillery with all their equipage/' For its security were "eight infirm wardens and forty halberdiers/' being the parade guard of the chief magistrate on state occasions. Willoughby was prompt and energetic. " The council table was his only couch. He could not venture to lay down his drawbridge without the attendance of his whole insignificant guard, until the arrival of a part of his disbanded regiment from Carlisle enabled him to arm two hundred men for the defence of the castle; a body soon reinforced by those who fled for shelter to the capital, and by some detachments of the army recalled from their quarters by the lords justices." Nothing could exceed the consternation of the citizens. Rumors the most appalling flew like lightning. Many of the English went on board vessels in the river to return to their native country, and, though wind-bound, preferred remaining on the water to venturing on land again. A fleet of Scotch fishermen offered five hundred of their men for the service of the state, but just as the offer was accepted, they set sail under a false alarm. Four hundred soldiers, em- barked for the service of Spain, and detained by order of the English parliament, were not per- mitted to leave the ships till they were nearly perishing from hunger, and eventually they dis- persed to join the rebel cause. However, under the advice of Sir John Temple, Master of the Rolls, the principal Protestant merchants of the AND CHARLES I. 100 city deposited their goods and valuables in the castle, under a guarantee of payment for what- ever should be applied to the public service. Thus provisions were obtained when the treasury was exhausted, and when the magistrates of the city could not or would not advance money to the government. Dublin was saved and became tranquil. Not so the country. In the course of the ensuing winter, horrors were perpetrated the accounts of which make the blood- run cold as we read them in our own day. " Forty thousand persons, and by some computations/' writes Godwin, "five times that number, are said to have perished in this undistinguishing massacre." Charles, unable to adjust matters with the Parliament, appealed to arms in support of his prerogative. In August, 1642, he unfurled his standard at Nottingham. " A high wind beat down the flag, an evil omen, as it was deemed by some who saw it, and a symbol as it proved of the result of that unnatural conflict. " At length, Ireland became the dernier resort of the royal cause. Ormond was made lord deputy and com- mander of the army. He soon found himself in a position of difficulty between two antagonists — the friends of Protestantism, and the Roman Catholic confederates — neither of whom now cared much for his sovereign, but against both of whom, though hostile the one to the other, he felt it impossible to maintain his ground. The month of February, 1617, found him yet in Dub- lin, but under the necessity of deciding to which 110 DUBLIN UNDER JAMES I. AND CHARLES I. party he would yield. His choice was in favor of the English parliament. In April, several of their regiments arrived, and in June came their commissioners with more troops. To these Or- mond formally surrendered Dublin, Drogheda, then called Tredagh, and other garrisons j and in July he delivered up into their hands the insig- nia of his authority, and went to England. One of the three persons given by Ormond as host- ages for this capitulation, was the eminent Sir James Ward, " the Camden of Ireland." Thus ended the reign of Charles over Dublin. The city was in a most wretched and dilapidated state. By returns dated August, 1644, its in- habitants numbered — Protestants, 2,565 men, and 2,986 women j Roman Catholics, 1^202 men, and 1,406 women; total, 8,159. But perhaps this census embraced only adults ; or, which is more probable, it did not include the suburbs; other- wise the population had decreased three-fifths during the preceding thirty-four years — a dimi- nution incredible, even with every allowance for havoc made by war, pestilence, and famine. DUBLIN AT THE COMMONWEALTH, ETC. Ill SECTION V. DUBLIN AT THE COMMONWEALTH, THE RESTORA- TION, AND THE REVOLUTION. On the surrender of Dublin to the parliament- ary commissioners, they appointed colonel Michael Jones to be its governor with the command of the troops. His first care was to repair the walls and otherwise to prepare the city for defence against the army of the confederates which threatened it. Within a fortnight after Ormond had left, Jones marched forth and attacked them at Duggan's Hill, gaining a complete victory. They are said to have had between five and six thousand slain in the engagement ; fifteen of their field-officers, and eighty-four other commissioned oificers were among the prisoners ', while Jones lost only twenty men. Besides artillery and other spoil, sixty-four " fair oxen" fell into his hands, and proved a most seasonable supply. A person giving an account of the battle, wrote, "All their colors we have, which Colonel Jones would not be persuaded to have brought into Dublin with triumph, as savoring (said he) of os- tentation, and attributing to man the glory of this great work due to the Lord alone. ;; By Novem- 112 DUBLIN AT THE COMMONWEALTH, ber, however, the rebel leader, Owen Roe O'Neil, was committing such devastations in the neigh- borhood of Dublin, that not fewer than two hun- dred fires were visible at the same time from one of the church steeples. Ormond, still attached to Charles, and think- ing it possible even yet to retrieve his royal mas- ter's affairs, returned to Jreland. In January, 1648-9, he concluded a peace with the confeder- ates, in the king's name and behalf. Charlgs, or Glamorgan, whom he accredited for the pur- pose, had often negotiated and made peace with them before, and as often had the terms agreed on been disallowed or broken through. Lord Inchiquin also now made common cause with the Irish : the Scots of Ulster, too, ranged them- selves against the parliament and the " sectaries. " Early in 1649, Oliver Cromwell was appointed by the parliament their lord-lieutenant for Ire- land. He invited the eminent Dr. John Owen, whose " Exposition of the Hebrews" and other works, are yet well known and valued, to accom- pany him as chaplain, and to regulate the affairs of Trinity College. To this, after much difficulty, Owen acceded. The army for Ireland, under Cromwell's command, assembled at Milford Haven in August, and the day before embarking was spent by them in fasting and prayer. About this juncture, Dublin was in deep dis- tress. Jones, its governor, was closely pressed by Ormond and the confederates, who had en- camped at Finglass, but on July the 25th had removed to llathmines, on the opposite side of THE RESTORATION AND REVOLUTION. 113 the city. There Jones attacked them with suc- cess. The parliament ordered his dispatch to be printed for the information of the English public. Some extracts from this small old pamphlet may iuterest the reader. The battle is sometimes mentioned as fought at " Bagotrath," a place be- tween Donnybrook and Beggar's Bush, now occu- pied by Upper Bagot street, taking its name from a "rath" or fort there, which, in the thirteenth century, came into the possession of the " Bagot" family. The conflict probably waxed strongest over the lands extending from that place to Rath- mines. Rathniines was then "compassed by a wall about sixteen feet high, and inclosing ten acres of ground." The pamphlet has for its title — " Lieutenant- General Jones's Letter to the Council of State, of a Great Victory which it had pleased God to give the forces, in the City of Dublin, under his com- mand on the Second of this instant August, against the Earl of Ormond's and the Lord Inchi- quin's forces before the City." Jones's letter begins : " Right Honorable : the Lord hath bless- ed this your army with good success against Ormond and his, for which God's most holy name be glorified." After giving the particulars of the engagement, he proceeds : " The whole work is the Lord's doing, and it is marvellous in our eyes; by whose especial providence it was that we should thus engage, we ourselves at first not so far intend- ing it; neither did the enemy expect our doing so ; nor would they have willingly engaged with us ; if it might have been by them avoided, they 114 DUBLIN AT THE COMMONWEALTH, reserving themselves for the coming up of Clan- ricard with his Connanght forces, about three thousand, and the Lord of Ard's with his seven thousand Scots, all ready for marching; Lnchiquin also being looked for, who had the week before gone towards Munster, with two regimeuts of horse, for appeasing some stirrings there by Owen Eoe, raised in his absence. Never was any day in Ireland like this, to the confusion of the Irish, and to the raising up the spirits of the poor Eng- lish, and to the restoring of the English interest, which, from their first footing in Ireland, was never in so low a condition as at that very in- stant, there not being one considerable landing- place left you but this alone, and this also (without this the Lord's most gracious goodness and providence to us) almost gone," etc. " Your honor's most faithful servant, Mic. Jones. Dated Dublin, Aug. 6, 1619." In addition to the numbers slain, Jones took prisoners seven- teen field officers, and more than 150 other com- missioned officers. Of the troops taken, 1,500 joined the parliamentary service. "A list of artillery taken .from the Irish at Ramines, the 2d of August, 1619. One brass cannon, weigh- ing 7,321 pounds, her length 10 feet, her bullet weighing 44 pounds. One brass demi-cannon eldest, weighing 5,428 pounds, her length 11 J feet, her bullet weighing 32 pounds. Two brass demi-cannon of one mould, each weighing 4,400 pounds, their length 9 J feet, their bullet weigh- ing 26 pounds. One square brass demi-culverin weighing 2,800 pounds, her length 11 feet 4 inches, THE RESTORATION AND REVOLUTION. 115 her bullet weighing 12 pounds. One small brass Baker-drake, weighing 600 pounds, her length 4? feet, her bullet weighing 6 pounds. One brass mortar-piece weighing 927 pounds, her shell weighing 100 pounds." " Captain Otway, the messenger that brought this dispatch," says the pamphlet, " who was an actor in that service, re- lates that the enemy marched away with such haste that they left their whole camp, which was very well furnished of all provisions of victual, store of wine, silks and velvet, scarlet and other cloth, both woollen and linen, and some money, all the cattle left in the quarters of Dublin as they found them there. Wednesday, the 8th, was appointed to be a day of thanksgiving in Dublin for this great victory." Besides the cas- tles of Rathmines and Rathgar, Naas, Maynooth, and various other places, surrendered to Jones at that time. The Earl of Fingall and a brother of Ormond were among the prisoners, and it is said that Ormond himself narrowly escaped. The news of this " great victory" reached Cromwell at Milford, and is noticed by him in letters written on ship-board when about to sail. About the middle of August, he "landed at Ringsend with 8,000 foot, 4,000 horse, a for- midable train of artillery, and all other neces- saries of war." In Dublin, he " was received with all possible demonstrations of joy ) the great guns echoing forth their welcome, and the acclamations of the citizens resounding in every street. The Lord Lieutenant being come into the city — where the concourse of the citizens was very great, they 116 DUBLIN AT THE COMMONWEALTH, all flocking to see him of whom they had heard so much — at a convenient place he made a stand, and with his hat in his hand, made a speech to them/' This speech was entertained with great applause by the people, who all cried out, " "W« will live and die with you !" Cromwell had nothing to detain him in Dublin, beyond making arrangements for governing the city, and for prosecuting the campaign on which he was about to enter : the rout of Ormond by Jones had cleared the way for him in the neigh borhood of the metropolis. In a few days, he with his army marched towards Drogheda, where he promptly gave unmistakable and terrific proof of the course he had resolved to pursue. Carlyle describes it truly : " Oliver descended on Ireland like the hammer of Thor — smote it, as at one fell stroke, into dust and ruin, never to reunite against him more." "To him," Merle d'Aubigne says, " the most energetic way appeared the most hu- mane." Even Sir Jonas Barrington writes of him, " Never was any rebel so triumphant as he was in Ireland ; yet it is impossible to deny, that perhaps a less decisive or less cruel general than that splendid usurper, might by lenity have in- creased the misery in prolonging the warfare, and have lengthened out the sanguinary scenes of an unavailing resistance." Owen did not accompany Cromwell to the coun • try. He remained preaching in Dublin till, in a few months, through abundant labors in that and other ways, his health declined, and he returned to his pastorate at Coggeshall in Essex. In a THE RESTORATION AND REVOLUTION. 117 sermon on " The Steadfastness of the Promises and the Sinfulness of Staggering/' preached be- fore the parliament, February 28th, 1649, he lays open the case of Ireland, and pleads in its behalf in a style worthy of himself. "How is it," he asks, " that Jesus Christ is in Ireland only as a lion staining all his garments with the blood of his enemies ; and none to hold him out as a Lamb sprinkled with his own blood to his friends ? Is- it the sovereignty and interest of England that is alone to be there transacted ? For my part, I see no further into the mystery of these things, but that I could heartily rejoice that, innocent blood being expiated, the Irish might enjoy Ire- land so long as the moon endureth, so that Jesus Christ might possess the Irish." In urging his auditors to "do their utmost for the preaching of the gospel in Ireland," he pleads in this strain : "They want it. No want like theirs who want the gospel. I would there were for the present one gospel preacher for every walled town in the English possession in Ireland. The land mourn- eth, and the people perish for lack of knowledge : many run to and fro, but it is upon other designs : knowledge is not increased. They are sensible of their wants, and cry out for a supply. The tears and cries of the inhabitants of Dublin, after the manifestation of Christ, are ever in my view. If they were in the dark, and loved to have it so, it might something close a door upon the bowels of our compassion j but they cry out of their dark- ness, and are ready to follow every one whosoever to have a candle. If their being gospelless move 118 DUBLIN AT THE COMMONWEALTH, not our hearts, it is hoped their importunate cries will disquiet our rest, and wrest help as a beggar doth amis," etc. These appeals from Owen to the parliament told better for Ireland than did Lord Bacon's advice to Queen Elizabeth's secretary, half a cen- tury before. In the month after they were uttered, a bill was passed for vesting certain estates in the •hands of trustees for the better support of Trinity College, the erection of a second college, the sup- port of professors in the university, and the main- tenance of a free-school; and on the same day the House resolved to " send over forthwith six able ministers to dispense the gospel in the city of Dublin." Perhaps it is to the college and free-school whose erection was provided for by the above bill, or to that college and the one previously existing in Back lane, which had been taken from the Roman Catholics and connected with the univer- sity, that Fuller refers when he writes, "The whole species of the university of Dublin was for many years preserved in the individuum of this one college [Trinity]. But, since, this instrument hath made better music, when what was but a monochord before hath got two other smaller strings unto it — the addition of New College and Kildare Hall." Among the ministers sent over pursuant to the parliament's resolve was John Rogers, a man of much learning, exuberant fancy, and ardent piety, all apparent in his singular quarto entitled "A Tabernacle for the Sun." Commissioners came from the parliament to THE RESTORATION AND REVOLUTION. 119 administer the affairs of Ireland, in 1651, and resided in Cork House. They were accompanied by the Reverend Samuel Winter, previously mi- nister of Cottingham, in Yorkshire, whom they made provost of the College, which office he held till the Restoration. Calamy states that Winter relinquished a living of £400 a year in England, for a salary of £100, that he might promote the gospel in Ireland j also that Trinity College, which he found almost desolate, became under his care a valuable seminary of piety and learning. He was most indefatigable : besides presiding over the college, he was pastor of a church in the city, afternoon preacher at Christ Church, the principal service, had a sermon every Sunday morning in St. Nicholas's at seven o'clock, and preached oc- sionally at Maynooth. Many other ministers settled in Dublin during the Commonwealth, of whom the best known are Dr. Harrison, Stephen Charnock, author of the treatise on the "Divine Attributes," Samuel Mather, to whom we are indebted for a work on the " Types," being a collection of discourses de- livered in Dublin after the Restoration, and John Murcot, a young man of great promise, and whose ministry seems to have been attended with signal power for usefulness in the city and other parts. From Murcot* s Life, called "Moses in the Mount/'" in a posthumous volume of his works, we learn that people of the highest rank, as well as the public generally, flocked to hear him, and that both in the pulpit and in private he proved him- self to be most earnest for the honor of God and 120 DUBLIN AT THE COMMONWEALTH, the good of souls. Dr. Winter, with, whom he was colleague in the ministry, in an Epistle De- dicatory to the Lord Deputy Fleetwood and the Lord Henry Cromwell, prefixed to the above volume, says of him, " his praise is in the gospel throughout all the churches : I have seldom known of his years a head better hearted, or a heart better headed; the enlargement of whose heart was the enlargement of his abilities." He died in December, 1654, not having completed his thirtieth year, and was buried in St. Mary's chapel, Christ Church : his funeral was attended by the lord deputy, his commissioners, the mayor, aldermen, and great numbers of the citizens, Most persons are aware how nobly Oliver Crom- well espoused the cause of the persecuted Pro- testants in Piedmont. In July, 1655, a collection towards their relief was begun in Dublin, and in January the sum of £1,097 Qs. od. was remitted for the purpose by parties belonging to Dr. Win- ter's church. About the time we are now speaking of, asso- ciations by mutual agreement for common purposes were being formed in several parts of England, among the ministers of different denominations. The celebrated Richard Baxter was zealous in promoting them. Archbishop Usher approved of them. In their meetings one of the ministers presided as "moderator." Baxter, in his Life, writes that "the Independent churches also in Ireland, led on by Dr. Winter, pastor of their church in Dublin, associated with the moderate Presbyterians there, upon these provocations, THE RESTORATION AND REVOLUTION. 121 and the persuasions of Colonel John Bridges." He gives a letter signed by Winter and other ministers, " In the name of the associated churches of Christ in Ireland. These for the Reverend Mr. Richard Baxter, pastor of the church of Christ in Kidderminster, to be by him communi- cated to the several churches of that association." The letter is dated July 5th, 1655, and breathes genuine Christian catholicity : " The present con- dition of God's people in foreign parts, as among us," say the writers, " calls aloud for a more cor- dial union and communion among all such who desire to fear His name. It is therefore our hearts' desire, not to be wanting in our faith and prayers, resolves and endeavors, to the fulfilling of those exceeding great and precious truths which do eminently centre in these latter days, that Christ's friends may receive one mind and heart, to serve him with one lip and shoulder. We are thereby much encouraged to request your Christian assist- ance and brotherly correspondency, that we may all be the better able, in our several stations and relations, to promote more vigorously the interest of Christ and his people. After the sad shakings of this land, and his many turnings of things up- side down, the Lord is pleased to promise us a little reviving, and to open a door of hope, even in the valley of Achor. Your favorable help is therefore earnestly craved, that Ireland may once more partake of the glad tidings of heaven, and the wants of many thousand starving souls may be seasonably supplied with the bread of life." To the letter from which these sentences are 122 DUBLIN AT THE COMMONWEALTH, taken, Baxter and four other ministers sent a long and cordial response, " In the name of the Asso- ciated Ministers meeting at Kidderminster, August 12th, 1655/^ inscribed, "to the Reverend our much-honored Brother Dr. "Winter, Pastor of the Church of Dublin, to be communicated by him to the associated churches in Ireland : These." Under date of "Dublin, January 16th, 1655-6," a letter was sent to Baxter and his brethren, signed by Dr. Winter and five " Elders of the Church of Christ in Dublin, whereof Dr. Samuel Winter is Pastor," "In the name and by the ap- pointment of the rest of the associated churches in Ireland." Henry Cromwell was lord deputy at the time this correspondence was going on. He was a truly Christian man, and did much to promote the gospel in the country, and union between the followers of his and their Lord. At his invita- tion, a meeting of the principal ministers of differ- ent denominations, and from the several provinces of the country, was held in Dublin prevent the celebration Of their worship. What- ever was done in administering its ritual, had to be performed privately and by stealth. No chapels were permitted, and the priest moved his altar, books, and every thing necessary for the celebration of his religious rites, from house to house, among su>ch of his flock as were enabled in this way to support an itinerant domestic chap- lain ; while for the poorer some wash-house or stable, in a remote and retired situation, was se- lected, and here the service was silently and secretly performed, unobserved by the public eye." In consequence, however, of serious accidents fre- quently occurring to parties -thus crowded toge- ther, combined with a disposition to less severity on the part of the government, the Lord Lieu- tenant, Lord Chesterfield, in 1745, permitted the 154 DUBLIN IN congregations to assemble in more safe and pub- lic places. Chapels which had been long closed were reopened, and several new ones were sub- sequently built. But Ireland has given many proofs that neither the persecution, ■ nor the toleration, of a false religion by the civil authorities, insures the pre- dominance of tine piety in the community. Among the Protestant denominations, established or otherwise, in Dublin and in the country, at the period we write of, formalism was the order of the day. Early in the century, when Emlyn, co-pastor with Boyse in Wood street, avowed his disbelief in the deity of Christ, Boyse and the other Dissenting ministers, Presbyterian and In- dependent, proved their firm and zealous faith in that great truth. Afterwards John Leland, who had been ordained co-pastor with Nathaniel Weld, in the New Bow congregation, since removed to Eustace street, was honorably distinguishing himself by his various writings in defence of Christianity against the determined assaults made upon it by the leading skejDtics of the age. But by the middle of the century, when Leland was thus earnestly caring for the outworks of the gos- pel, complete listlessness towards the doctrines which are its life and strength and glory as a re- velation of salvation by grace through faith to depraved and guilty and perishing men, was set- tling like- a death-chill upon the dissenters of the metropolis, and upon the generality of their bre- thren elsewhere. And from the account given by the editor of the Life and Times of the Countess TIIE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY. 155 -of Huntingdon, of the parochial or conforming clergy of that period, it appears that vital godli- ness was well-nigh quite extinct. Such was the deplorable state of things affect- ing the highest and everlasting state of its in- habitants, when it pleased God, who commanded the light to shine out of darkness, to bring among them some of his servants bearing the light of the knowledge of his glory in the face of Jesus Christ. The first of these faithful men- was George Whitefield. His sphere of ministry embraced the countries speaking the English language on both sides of the Atlantic. With an eloquence which now flashed and rolled like the elements in a thunder-storm, and then tenderly beamed forth like the sun-ray on the flowers whose head the storm had drenched and made to droop, did he enforce on the people the truths which, under the guidance of the Messrs. Wesley, he had gathered out of God's precious word. The holiness of God as a Being of purer eyes than to behold ini- quity : the perfect excellence of the divine law ; its demand of entire obedience ; its adaptation, if observed, to promote the happiness of man; its spi- rituality, reaching to the most secret thoughts and affections of the heart : the corruption of human nature : the alienation of man from God, and his moral inability to keep the divine law : the sen- tence of everlasting condemnation, which, as the awful but righteous consequence, falls upon our race : the marvellous kindness of God in so com- mending his love to us, " that while we were yet 156 DUBLIN IN sinners Christ died for us :' ; the perfect satisfac- tion for sin rendered by his atoning sacrifice : the unutterable condescension and infinite love with which he receiveth sinners : the grace of the Holy Spirit : the necessity of an entire regenera- tion of the soul by his divine agency : forgive- ness through the blood of Christ offered to all who believe : the universal obligation of repent- ance : the requirement of holiness of heart and life, as the evidence of love to Christ, and the in- dwelling of the Spirit, as the author of holiness : such were the grand truths which were proclaimed by the TVesleys, Whitefield, and their coadjutors — derisively called Methodists — and which, in- numerous instances, fell with startling power on ears unaccustomed to evangelical statements and appeals. Whitefield's first visit to Ireland was what would be called accidental. On his return from Ame- rica in 1738, the vessel put into the Shannon in distress. He went to Limerick, introduced him- self as a clergyman, and preached in the cathe- dral. Thence he came to Dublin, where his name and fame had preceded him, and he was most kindly received by some leading dignitaries of the Church. He preached in St. Werburgh's and St. Andrew's, to large congregations, with an effect unknown in the city before. This visit was followed by others. When in Dublin in 1757, he preached in the open air on Oxman- town Green, and was in imminent danger through the violence of the mob, who stoned and other- wise illtreated him. On this he remarked, that THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY. 157 " when "he first came to Dublin the people re- ceived him as a gentleman, but at his last ap- pearance among them they treated him as a bound in one volume, pp. 514. Price 60 ctg. BOSTON COLLEGE 3 9031 01031529 9